Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Santa Monica City Council
June 28, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
June 28, 2022
Body
Santa Monica City Council
Original file
56.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santamonicacityca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

Garden plots are permitted to Santa Monica residents only in accordance with conditions set forth in the Community Gardens Permit Agreement.

Office of Sustainability and the Environment L-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit M - Department of Transportation: Taxis
Service FY 2022-23
Annual base franchise fee per taxicab company - set by ordinance $ 5,000.00 Annual franchise fee per vehicle in taxicab fleet - set by ordinance $ 452.00 New vehicle permit fee $ 135.78
Transfer vehicle permit fee $ 135.78
Renewal vehicle permit fee $ 81.47
Replacement vehicle permit fee $ 43.45
Vehicle re-inspection fee $ 54.31
New and renewal taxicab driver’s permit application fee $ 54.31 Taxicab driver’s permit re-examination fee $ 74.92
Taxicab driver’s permit transfer fee $ 74.92
Taxicab driver’s permit replacement fee $ 54.31
Mileage Rates-flag drop, first 1/9th mile $ 3.50
Mileage Rates - each additional 1/9th mile1
$ 0.40
Mileage Rates - each 37 seconds waiting/delay2
$ 0.40
Airport Flat Rates - North of I-10 to Los Angeles International Airport $ 45.00 Airport Flat Rates - South of I-10 to Los Angeles International Airport $ 40.00 Santa Monica to Bob Hope Airport $ 95.00
Fees are not subject to the City's annual Administration revision and increase.

NOTES:

1. Franchisee and Vehicle Franchise fees are due on January 1st of each year.

2. Vehicle permit renewal fees are due on or before December 31st of each year.

6. Senior Citizens (persons age 65 and older) and persons with disabilities (including persons with a Los Angeles County Transit Operators Association Metro Disabled Identity Card) shall be given a ten percent (10%) taxicab fare discount. The discount shall apply to all destinations and trips.
1 The fee for FY 2022-23 is shown in the amount that is charged to the customer - 1/9th of a mile.
2 The fee for FY 2022-23 is shown in the amount that is charged to the customer - each 37 seconds of delay.

3. Driver permit renewal fees are due between November 1st and December 31st of each year.

4.New taxicab driver permit fees shall be prorated monthly based on the number of calendar months remaining until the permit expires in accordance with Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 6.49.050(d).

5. If a due date falls on a weekend day or holiday, the due date is the next City of Santa Monica business day following the due date.

Taxicabs M - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit N - Department of Transportation: Pedicabs
Service Fee as of 7/1/22
New & Renewal Operators Permit Fee1 $253.14
Pedicab Vehicle Decal Permit Fee:

New pedicab vehicle permit fee $145.39
Transfer pedicab vehicle permit fee $145.39
Renewal pedicab vehicle permit fee $66.19
Replacement pedicab vehicle permit fee $46.72
Pedicab vehicle re-inspection fee $36.34
1 Fee is suspended until further notice.

Pedicabs N-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 1
A. Community Aquatics:
(1) Recreational and Fitness Swim
Youth1 Adult2 Senior/Student3 Family4
Daily Use
- Residents $2.00 $4.50 $2.25
- Non-Residents $4.00 $9.00 $4.50
Family Use (per day)
- Residents n/a n/a $10.25
- Non-Residents n/a n/a $20.50
Swim Pass (20 swims per pass)
- Residents $25.00 $68.25 $37.50
- Non-Residents $50.00 $137.00 $75.00
1Youth (17 years and under)
2Adults (18 years – 59 years) 3Others: Seniors (60 years and over); Students (18 years or older attending high school, college or trade school full-time with I.D.) 4Family (up to 2 adults and 2 children, additional children admitted at swim center rate) Available Friday night, Saturday and Sunday
(2) Adult and Youth Group Swim Lessons:
a) Residents $53.00 per session
b) Non-residents $105.00 per session
(3) Youth Semi-Private Swim Lessons:
a) Residents $91.00 per session
b) Non-residents $183.00 per session
(4) Specialty Classes: Resident Non-Resident
a) Junior Lifeguard Program $132.00 $166.00
b) Lifeguard Training $221.00 $259.00
c) Water Safety Instructor $275.00 $313.00
d) Diving & Water Polo $ 106.00 $210.00
(5) Aquatics Supplies Fees: Fees will be assessed to cover the actual cost of the items and a portion of administrative expenses.
(6) Shark Youth Swim Team:
a) Residents $144 per session
b) Non-residents $202 per session
*$5.00 Material Fee for Sharks
(7) Fitness Classes: Fees for Shallow or Deep Water Wet Workout/Aqua Aerobics and Fitness Classes
Resident Non-Resident
a) Adult $ 6.00 $12.00
b) Adult Fitness Class Pass* $53.00 $105.00
c) Senior/Student $ 3.00 $ 6.00

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 2
d) Senior/Student Fitness Pass* $27.00 $53.00
*Passes are good for 10 classes, and are non-refundable, non-transferable and non-interchangeable. (8) Aquatics Staffing Fee:

Aquatic Staffing fees shall be billed to the applicant in 30-minute increments for each staff on duty for the duration of the reservation. Fees for staff services are charged to the organization(s) utilizing aquatics facilities outside normal operating hours. Staffing fees are billed in additional to lane rental fees.

Staffing Fee
Hourly
Rate
Swim Instructor/Lifeguard $19.40
Chief Pool Lifeguard $25.23
Guest Services Assistant $23.08
Aquatics Program Coordinator $31.56
* The number of City Aquatic Staff required for an activity or event shall be based on the City’s Aquatics Supervision Standards and may require additional program, facility, or maintenance personnel due to the size or nature of the event. Lifeguard services are defined as on-deck supervision of water activities by City lifeguards. This will be determined at the time of application approval. **This fee may be divided if there are two or more permittees utilizing the facility at one time. ***Permits outside of regular operating hours must be a minimum of 2 hours, with the exception of those permits that are in conjunction with/adjacent to current operating hours.

B. Community Activities:

Gym User Fee: The fees charged for gym use shall help offset the cost of staffing, lights, maintenance and equipment, and shall be as follows:
1Adults (18-49 years old) 2Seniors (50 and older)
Youth Adult1 Seniors2
Daily Use Pass
- Resident $1.50 $3.00 $1.50
- Non Resident $1.50 $4.50 $3.00
Quarterly Passes
- Resident $15.00 $33.00 $16.00
- Non Resident $20.00 $40.00 $20.00

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 3
C. Tennis Court Reservation Rate: City park and Santa Monica High School Courts when used by the City pursuant to agreements with the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District are reserved. (1) Resident Hourly rates (payable in advance) $4.00 per hour, per person, per court Non-resident Hourly rates $5.00 per hour, per person, per court (2) Resident Quarterly passes are valid for 91 days from the date of purchase:
a) Youth (17 years and under) $22.00
b) Adults (18 years – 59 years) $65.00
c) Seniors (60 years and over) $22.00
(3) Resident Tennis Reservation Cards $14.00
(4) No Show Fee $4.00 per hour
No Show Fee (instructors) $8.00 per hour
(no shows or cancellation less than 24 hours in advance of scheduled time) (5) Independent Instructor court fee:

Number of students: 1-3 $17.00 per hour
$ 8.75 per ½ hour
Number of students: 4-7 $25.00 per hour
$12.50 per ½ hour
Group lessons of more than 4 are only allowed through the City’s Community Programs Division.
(6) Santa Monica – based Private Schools $11.00 per hour per court (7) Santa Monica –based Non-Profit Organizations $11.00 per hour per court waived for youth organizations
(8) Ball Machine Fee $14.00 per hour
D. *CREST Out of School Time programs: The CREST program is a joint program between the City and the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District. The following fees represent the fees for the City portion of the program.

Service Hours of Service Days of Service Fee
CREST Club School dismissal until
6:00 p.m.

School year only - no
breaks $375/
month
Single Full Day
Care
8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Pupil Free Day and Single
Day Camp
$82/day
E. *CREST Enrichment – A registration fee will be assessed to cover contractor payment. Participants shall pay for activity materials, if applicable.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 4
Registration Fee $143 - $237 per child per class
F. Camp Programs:

Day/Sports Camps
- Resident Full Day $450
- Resident Half day $280
- Non Resident Full day $500
- Non Resident Half day $310
- Extended Care $70
G. SM Adaptive Recreation and Sports Social Programs: A fee will be assessed to cover the direct cost of the activity.

H. Adult Sports Leagues: A fee will be assessed to cover costs for supplies and a portion of administrative expenses. Officiating fees are additional and paid directly to officials.

Team Fee per Season Residents
Residents / SM
Workers
NonResidents
Basketball $354 $401 $441
Volleyball $268 $307 $334
Softball – Men’s $500 $579 $648
Softball – Women’s $420 $483 $546
Softball – Co-ed $477 $548 $617
Softball – Tournament $241 $272 $305
Registration Priority and Definitions
1) Resident Teams – At least 60% of players must live in Santa Monica 2) Residents/SM Workers – At least 60% of players must live or work in Santa Monica. 3) Non-Resident Teams – Less than 60% of players live or work in Santa Monica I. Drop-in Soccer Program: The fees charged for field use shall help offset the cost of staffing, lights, maintenance and equipment, and shall be as follows:

Youth Adult1 Seniors2
Daily Use Pass
- Resident $1.00 $3.00 $1.00
- Non Resident $1.00 $5.00 $2.00
1Adults (18-49 years old) 2Seniors (50 and older)

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 5
J. Skate Park Fees: A fee will be assessed to cover supplies and a portion of administrative expenses. 1 Valid 91 days from date of purchase
K. Memorial Park Fitness Room Fees
(1) $ 4.00 per entry residents
(2) $ 6.00 per entry non-residents
(3) $26.00 4 week pass – resident
(4) $35.00 4 week pass – non-resident
(5) $ 2.00 Seniors - per entry residents
(6) $ 3.00 Seniors - per entry non-residents
(7) $13.00 Seniors - 4 week pass – resident
(8) $17.00 Seniors - 4 week pass – non-resident
(9) $11.00 per hour personal training permit (1-2 clients) (10) $ 5.00 per ½ hour personal training permit (1-2 clients) L. Activity Passport Replacement Card
(1) $ 1.00 Residents
(2) $ 2.00 Non-Residents
(3) $ 1.00 Employee Fitness Pass
M. Pickleball
(1) $3.00 Residents
(2) $5.00 Non-Residents
N. Community Classes Administration Fee
$5.50 per class registration
NOTES:

Administrative, registration, and materials fees may be assessed for all social service, recreation and community programs, classes One-Time Registration Youth Adult
- Resident $10.00 $15.00
- Non Resident $10.00 $16.50
Daily Pass
- Resident Skate Park & BMX $3.00 $5.00
- Non-Resident Skate Park & BMX $5.00 $5.50
Quarterly Pass1
- Resident Skate Park $20.00 $35.00
- Non-Resident Skate Park $20.00 $38.50
- Resident BMX $10.00 $20.00
- Non-Resident BMX $10.00 $25.00
Annual Pass
- Resident Skate Park $80.00 $140.00
- Non Resident Skate Park $80.00 $154.00
- Resident BMX $35.00 $75.00
- Non-Resident BMX $35.00 $95.00

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 6
and services that are listed.

Fees to be charged for social service, recreation and community programs which are not listed shall be determined by the Community and Cultural Services Director and shall be based upon the costs incurred in providing the program.

Fee reductions, waiver, or reasonable and customary payment plans may be approved administratively to promote community access to special events and other social and recreational programming.

Beach parking fees will be waived:

A. For registered participants of City classes occurring at the beach and Ocean View Tennis Courts for the duration of the class.

B. To allow time for drop-off and pick-up of registered participants of City youth camps occurring at the beach.

C. For City-authorized contractors and their employees while conducting City activities at the beach and Ocean View Tennis Courts.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit P1: Community Services

COMMUNITY MEETING ROOMS
Maximum Capacity Hourly Rate
Effective 7-1-22
18-60 $33.00
90-130 $67.00
18-60 $47.00
90-130 $95.50
18-60 $16.50
90-130 $33.00
Must have at least 50% Santa Monica residents.

Large rooms available at:

Joslyn Park
Marine Park
Reed Park
Virginia Avenue Park
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

Reed Park: 1150 Lincoln Blvd.

Memorial Park: 1401 Olympic
Euclid Park: 1525 Euclid Street
Insurances as determined by the City's Risk Manager may be required.

Park building rooms are not available for commercial ventures.

Douglas Park: 2439 Wilshire Blvd.

Joslyn Park: 633 Kensington
Marine Park: 1406 Marine Street
Virginia Avenue Park: 2200 Virginia Avenue
Euclid Park
Joslyn Park
Memorial Park
Reed Park
Virginia Avenue Park
Large
Large
Park Building Rental Charges
Room Size
Residents :

Small
Rental Fees as of 7-1-22. Fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increaseunless otherwise noted.

Small rooms available at:

Douglas Park
Non-Residents:

Small
Large
Santa Monica based non-profit organizations:

Small
Normal room rental hours of operation are 8:00 a.m. - 11:00 p.m. daily, excluding City Holidays.

Virginia Avenue Park room rental hours of operation are: Saturday & Sunday from 8am - 10pm.

A rental charge of $2.69/hr up to 20 hr/week will be assessed to the Santa Monica Lawn Bowling Club for use of the Douglas Park Clubhouse. Hours above 20 hours per week will be charged the Douglas Park Clubhouse facilities rental rate.

Based on availability, a staffing fee of $20.69 (FY 2022-23 rate) per hour will be assessed for usage outside of operating hours.

Capacities vary by facility depending upon square footage, placing of exits, amount of furniture and equipment in the room. Listed capacities are an approximation.

Rates for filming in park buildings are listed in a separate list.

Facility permits are issued according to the facility permitting guidelines. User categories are defined in exhibit P8 of this resolution.

Rental rate waivers may be available for collaborative programs with the City, City sponsored programs, and SM based non-profit youth groups.

Non-SM rates for Reed Park are the same as SM rates due to Proposition A funding requirements.

Staffing fees shall be subject to the annual administrative increase set forth in this Resolution.

Park Building Rentals P1-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit P5: Community Services

1. Non-Profit Youth Aquatics Program
Short Course
FY2022-23
Long Course
FY2022-23
Santa Monica Based $ 6.00 $ 12.00 per lane per hour
Non-Santa Monica Based $ 12.00 $ 24.00 per lane per hour

2. Non-Profit Adult Aquatics Program and Private Schools Santa Monica Based $ 11.00 $ 22.00 per lane per hour
Non-Santa Monica Based $ 22.00 $ 44.00 per lane per hour

3. Other Organizations and Businesses
Santa Monica Based $ 23.00 $ 46.00 per lane per hour
Non-Santa Monica Based $ 46.00 $ 92.00 per lane per hour

4. Tournaments - Fitness Pool Only
Santa Monica Based Non-profit Youth Aquatics Group $ 225.00 per hour Santa Monica Based Non-profit Adult Aquatics Group $ 375.00 per hour

5. Room Rental (2 hour minimum)
April - October
Santa Monica-based Non-profit Groups & Community Groups $ 90.00 per hour Non-Santa Monica-based Non-profit and Community Groups $ 114.00 per hour November - March
Santa Monica-based Non-profit Groups & Community Groups $ 50.00 per hour Non-Santa Monica-based Non-profit and Community Groups $ 75.00 per hour

6. Filming Fees
Motion Still
Splash or Fitness Pool $ 500.00 $ 300.00
Per Lane Rate $ 64.00 $ 32.00
Deck Only Rate $ 300.00 $ 150.00

1. 2.

3. 4. These fees are in addition to any permits or licenses required for conducting filming in the City of Santa Monica. Per lane usage is permitted only if lanes are rented when the facility is already in use. Additional compensation may be required for filming in the event a scheduled activity or permit is displaced. Additional fees may be assessed for damage to the facility interior or exterior. Pool rental fees are based on the usage of the pool requested and the Sun Deck with Meeting Room if available. Per lane rental and deck only rentals do not include use of the Meeting Room. Room rental fees apply.

Santa Monica Aquatics Facility - Rental Charges
Rental Fees as of 7/1/22; Fees is this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Category
FY2022-23
FY2022-23
Hourly rates FY2022-23
FEE CATEGORY NOTES:

Aquatics groups (teams and clubs) only; must have 50% residency participation to be Santa Monica based.

Aquatics groups (teams and clubs) only; must have 50% residency participation to be Santa Monica based. Includes Santa Monicabased primary and secondary private schools.

Includes room rental, staff facility supervision and recreational swim for up to 20 youth for parties. The City will not provide catering, decorations or direct staff involvement in leading activities.

Swim Center Rentals P5-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-1

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

FACILITY USER CATEGORIES
PARK BUILDING USER CATEGORIES (see Exhibit P1)
Permits for Park Building Meeting Rooms shall be granted according to the user categories listed below in priority order:

City Programs, Events and Meetings
The City of Santa Monica conducts meetings and offers a range of programs and events for youth, adults and persons with disabilities. These programs and events are offered by the Community Services Department which has first priority use of the Park Building Meeting Rooms. Rental fees are not applicable.

Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Groups/Organizations
Santa Monica has a wide network of non-profit organizations with 501(c)3, 501(c)4 or 501 (c) 6 non-profit status. These groups provide a range of human services, education and recreational programs and events to Santa Monica residents. They may serve the general public or special user groups such as seniors, youth, or persons with disabilities. These programs may be free, or attendees may pay a fee for service, a membership fee or a voluntary donation. At least 50% of the organization’s members must be Santa Monica residents. To be in this user category, the organization must be in good standing with the State of California, verified annually. Self-help groups are exempt from the State verification and at least 50% of meeting attendees must be Santa Monica residents. This category also includes governmental agencies. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Santa Monica Residents
Informal community groups or individuals that do not have tax-exempt non-profit status and are not a business entity but provide community services or citizen participation opportunities to Santa Monica residents are in this category. These events may be meetings, social events or educational or recreation activities. Events and meetings are

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-2
either offered free or an unspecified voluntary donation may be requested to cover the costs of the event or meeting. The permit applicant must be a Santa Monica resident.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Non-Santa Monica-based Community Groups and Individuals These users are non-profit organizations without 50% or more attendees being Santa Monica residents or meet the definition of the Santa Monica Residents category however the permit applicant is not a Santa Monica resident.

KEN EDWARDS CENTER (KEC) USER CATEGORIES (see Exhibit P2) Permits for Ken Edwards Center shall be granted according to the Ken Edwards Center Permitting Guidelines. User categories are defined below.

Non-Profit Organizations
501(c)3 or 501(c)4 non-profit community-based organizations, that are funded through the Human Services Grants Program, Cultural Arts Organizational Support Grant Program, or CO-Arts Grant Program of the City of Santa Monica; plus approved Santa Monica neighborhood groups are allowed use of the KEC at no charge for 300 meeting hours each fiscal year. Agencies using more than 300 hours during any fiscal year will be charged the non-profit/community rental fee for those hours over 300. Other 501(c)3 or 501(c)4 non-profit human services organizations meeting the human services needs of Santa Monica residents but not funded directly by the City are charged the nonprofit/community rate. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Non-Profit Senior Service Organizations
Non-profit organizations with 501(c)3 or 501(c)4 status, not funded by the City of Santa Monica, that provide senior programming consistent with the City’s Housing and Human Services Division and meet the needs of Santa Monica’s senior citizens are in this category. To encourage a full range of senior services, these organizations shall be

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-3
charged the non-profit Senior Services rate. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Community Groups
Those organizations without 501(c)3 or 501(c)4 status convening meetings with a focus on human service issues that will benefit low and moderate-income Santa Monica residents are included in this category. These meetings are free of charge and open to the public. An unspecified voluntary donation may be collected to cover the costs of having the meeting. Such groups are charged the non-profit/community group rental fee.

Non-profit organizations conducting fund raising events are also in this category.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Filming (See Exhibit P4)
Companies or individuals desiring to take still or motion pictures in Ken Edwards Center are in this category. A film permit must be obtained from the City of Santa Monica in addition to a Ken Edwards Center rental permit. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

SPORTS FACILITIES USER CATEGORIES (see Exhibit P3a)
Permits for fields will be issued in accordance with the Field Permitting Guidelines.

Youth Sports Groups
Community–based athletic non-profit organizations or sports groups with multiple teams and an established program that provides a continuum of opportunities to ensure diversity of users or the full range of skill levels are in this category. Groups must demonstrate that 60% of their participants live in Santa Monica to receive the resident rate. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required. To be in this user category, verification of good standing with the State of California is required annually.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-4
Primary and Secondary Private Schools
Primary and secondary private schools offering sports programs are in this category.

These schools must be based in Santa Monica to receive the resident rate.

Non-Profit Organizations
Organizations with 501(c)3 or 501(c)4 non-profit status offering sports programs and events to Santa Monica residents are in this category. They may serve the general public or special user groups such as seniors, youth, or persons with disabilities. These programs may be free, or attendees may pay a fee for service, a membership fee or a voluntary donation. To be in this user category, verification of good standing with the State of California is required annually. These organizations must have membership of at least 60% residents to qualify for the resident rate. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Community Groups and Individuals
Sports groups/teams who do not qualify as a Youth Sports Group and individuals desiring use of a sports facility are in this category. Programs are either offered free or an unspecified voluntary donation may be requested to cover costs. Groups/teams requesting seasonal permits must demonstrate that 60% of their participants live in Santa Monica to qualify for the Santa Monica resident rate. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Camps
Organizations conducting youth or adult sports camps are in this category. A voluntary donation or fee for service may be requested to cover costs. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required. Camps must be based in Santa Monica to receive the resident rate.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-5
FILMING USER CATEGORIES (see Exhibit P4)
Filming
Companies or individuals desiring to take still or motion pictures in City facilities are in this category. A filming permit must be obtained from the City of Santa Monica in addition to a facility rental permit. Insurances as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

SANTA MONICA AQUATICS FACILITIES (see Exhibit P5)
Permits for the Santa Monica run aquatics facilities shall be granted according to the priority usage categories listed below. There are two lists, the first will be used when permitting the Santa Monica Swim Center, the second outlines the priority groups for Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District facilities when operated by the city. In the event that there are competing demands within a user priority, staff will use additional factors as indicated in the Pool Allocation Guidelines to allocate pool space to ensure a balance of programming is available to residents.

Santa Monica Swim Center Priority Usage Categories:

1. City Programs
The City of Santa Monica offers a range of sports programs for youth, adults and persons with disabilities. These programs are offered by the Community Services Department which has first priority use of the City of Santa Monica run aquatic facilities. Rental fees are not applicable.

2. Santa Monica College (SMC)
SMC offers a range of sports programs for students that may utilize the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities. Schedule, fees and fee waivers shall be based on a separate facility agreement between the City and SMC.

3. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD)

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-6
The SMMUSD offers a range of sport programs for students that may utilize City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities.

4. Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations – Youth Aquatics/Sports Programs A community-based athletic non-profit organization or aquatics group whose youth program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is 50% or more Santa Monica residents. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

5. Non-Santa Monica-based Non-profit Organizations Permitting the Swim Center 2,000 hours or more annually – Youth Aquatics/Sports Programs A community-based athletic non-profit organization or aquatics group whose youth program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is less than 50% Santa Monica residents however use of the aquatics facilities is at least 2,000 hours annually. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

6. Santa Monica-based Primary and Secondary Private Schools Santa Monica-based primary and secondary private schools offering aquatics programs are in this category. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required

7. Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations - Adult Aquatics/Sports Programs Santa Monica-based aquatics group whose adult program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is 50% or more Santa Monica residents are in this category. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

8. Non-Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations permitting the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities 2,000 hours or more annually – Adult Aquatics/Sports Programs

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-7
A community-based aquatics group whose adult program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is less than 50% Santa Monica residents however use of the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is at least 2,000 hours annually. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

9. Other Santa Monica-based Organizations and Businesses Santa Monica residents, Santa Monica-based organizations (not meeting the criteria of higher user categories), Santa Monica-based private businesses and commercial camp organizers and Santa Monica-based special event promoters are in this category.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

10. Other Non-Santa Monica-based Organizations and Businesses Non-Santa Monica residents, youth or adult aquatics groups (not meeting the criteria of higher user categories), non-Santa Monica-based private businesses, commercial camp organizations, and non-Santa Monica-based special event promoters are in this category.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

11. Filming
Companies or individuals desiring to take still or motion pictures using aquatics facilities are in this category. A film permit must be obtained from the City of Santa Monica in addition to a facility rental permit. Insurances as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

SMMUSD Aquatic Facilities Priority Usage Categories:

1. City Programs
The City of Santa Monica offers a range of sports programs for youth, adults and persons with disabilities. These programs are offered by the Community Services Department which has first priority use of the City of Santa Monica run aquatic facilities. Rental fees are not applicable.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-8

2. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD) The SMMUSD offers a range of sport programs for students that may utilize City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities.

3. Santa Monica College (SMC)
SMC offers a range of sports programs for students that may utilize the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities. Schedule, fees and fee waivers shall be based on a separate facility agreement between the City and SMC.

4. Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations – Youth Aquatics/Sports Programs A community-based athletic non-profit organization or aquatics group whose youth program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is 50% or more Santa Monica residents. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

5. Non-Santa Monica-based Non-profit Organizations Permitting the Swim Center 2,000 hours or more annually – Youth Aquatics/Sports Programs A community-based athletic non-profit organization or aquatics group whose youth program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is less than 50% Santa Monica residents however use of the aquatics facilities is at least 2,000 hours annually. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

6. Santa Monica-based Primary and Secondary Private Schools Santa Monica-based primary and secondary private schools offering aquatics programs are in this category. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required

7. Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations - Adult Aquatics/Sports Programs Santa Monica-based aquatics group whose adult program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is 50% or more Santa Monica residents are in this category. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-9

8. Non-Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations permitting the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities 2,000 hours or more annually – Adult Aquatics/Sports Programs
A community-based aquatics group whose adult program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is less than 50% Santa Monica residents however use of the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is at least 2,000 hours annually. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

9. Other Santa Monica-based Organizations and Businesses Santa Monica residents, Santa Monica-based organizations (not meeting the criteria of higher user categories), Santa Monica-based private businesses and commercial camp organizers and Santa Monica-based special event promoters are in this category.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

10. Other Non-Santa Monica-based Organizations and Businesses Non-Santa Monica residents, youth or adult aquatics groups (not meeting the criteria of higher user categories), non-Santa Monica-based private businesses, commercial camp organizations, and non-Santa Monica-based special event promoters are in this category.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

11. Filming
Companies or individuals desiring to take still or motion pictures using aquatics facilities are in this category. A film permit must be obtained from the City of Santa Monica in addition to a facility rental permit. Insurances as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit Q: Community Services - Beach House
FY 2022-23
$12.00 per day
$3.00 per hour

ACTIVITIES
Pool Passes - Summer & Pop-Up Pool Days
Adult $10.00 per day
Senior (60+) $5.00 per day
Youth (1-17) $4.00 per day
Children Under 12 Months Free per day
Pool Passes - Sunset Swim
Adult $10.00 per day
Senior (60+) $5.00 per day
Event Fee $20.00
Series
Single Class/
Drop-in Rate
Semi-Private Swim Lessons $110.00 (2-wk session) N/A
Aqua Aerobics $11.00
Paddleboard Lessons $45.00
Floating Fitness $20.00

RENTALS
ACBH Court Reservations - Volleyball/Tennis/Soccer (Year-Round) Community Groups/Individuals $15.00 per hour
Non-Profit Organizations/Schools $15.00 per hour
Commercial - Occasional Use $33.00 per hour
Commercial - Seasonal Use $16.00 per hour
Camp $35.00 per hour
Tournament $26.00 per day
Walk-up: First Come, First Served Free
ACBH Canopy Reservations (Summer) $60.00 4 hours
Paddleboard Rentals (Year-Round) $45.00 2 hours
$65.00 4 hours
Beach House Facility Rental and Use Charges

4. The Beach House parking lots are hereby excluded from Resolution Number ____________establishing parking rates for beach parking lots in Santa Monica.

BEACH HOUSE
Rental Fees as of 7-1-22. F ees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

1. The rates to be charged for parking at the Beach House shall be fixed by the City Manager from time to time, but in no event shall exceed twelve dollars ($12.00) per day or three dollars ($3.00) per hour.

2. Use of residential parking permits is prohibited.

3. Disabled Placards and Senior Beach Parking passes will be accepted for day use parking at the Beach House.

Beach House Parking
Beach House Parking
Beach House Community Use Fees
The following fees are established for recreational facilities, services, programs, and classes. These fees may be updated periodically to reflect changes in the cost of living as measured by the growth of total city compensation.

CLASSES
N/A
N/A
To maximize the public access and enjoyment of the pool or other amenities, the Director may authorize from time to time temporarily or seasonally discounted fees. Such discounts may be made available to the public without preference or bias to any user group.
(1) When instruction and other services are provided by a contract instructor, the fees charged for recreation and community programs at the Beach House shall be based on the cost of the contract plus administration and shall be no more than is reasonably necessary to cover the cost of the goods and services provided, plus administration.

N/A
Beach House Q-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit Q: Community Services - Beach House

BEACH HOUSE
Beach House Facility Rental and Use Charges
(2)  To maximize facility use by the public and revenue return to the City, the Director may fix any given rental rate at his or her discretion provided that such rate is commensurate with market rate for such rentals. (2)  When provided by the City, fees charged for recreation and community programs shall be determined by the Director of Community Services (“Director”) and shall be based on the costs incurred in providing the program, plus administration. (3)  A registration and/or materials fee may be assessed for programs, classes and services offered at the Beach House. (1)  The Director shall establish and update from time to time Facility Rental and Use Charges for private events or commercial filming that are commensurate with current market rates for comparable venues.

NOTES:

Fees and charges imposed for the use of Beach House facilities and services but not listed in this resolution shall be determined by the Director. Fees shall be based on the costs incurred in providing the facility or service, and charges shall be based on market conditions.

Beach House fee reductions or waivers may be approved administratively to promote community access to special events and other social and recreational programming.
(3)  Charges for up to 25% of certain classes of private rentals may be reduced by up to 50% for non-profit 501(c)3 organizations.

The Director shall establish and update from time to time the eligibility standards for this discount. The standards shall ensure that such discount opportunities are allocated fairly and without bias, shall specify the type of uses permitted, and shall list the facilities available.
(4)  Charges for certain private rentals may be reduced by up to 50% for governmental agencies. The Director shall establish and update from time to time the standards for this discount. The standards shall ensure that such discount opportunities are allocated fairly and without bias, shall specify the type of uses permitted, and shall list the facilities available. (5)  The Director may establish additional charges for goods and services associated with facility rentals at market rates, including but not limited to:
a. Security staffing and services
b. Parking attendant and services
c. Cleaning and trash removal services
d. Event production and management services
e. Furniture or equipment rentals
(6)  In accordance with industry standard practice, the Director may charge to the renter a percentage of gross receipts for all outside vendor contracts for services provided on-site during the facility rental. (7)  The Director may require a deposit or other security prior to issuance of a Facility Rental Agreement or Commercial Filming Permit. The policy regarding the amount of deposit and deposit return shall be established by the Director and revised from time to time in accordance with standard industry practices.
(8)  With Council approval, the City Manager may prepare a contract for facility rental management services in accordance with all applicable City, state, and federal laws. Any such contract shall be let. Such Contractor shall adhere to the fees and charges established in this Resolution. Additional fees or charges to cover the cost of services provided by the Contractor may be assessed upon written authorization by the City Manager.

Beach House Q-2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit T - Library
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit
Interlibrary Loan Request (plus Lending Library Charges, if any) $ 5.00 Replacement of Lost Adult Library Card
$ 2.00
Replacement of Lost Children's Library Card
$ 1.00
Black & White Copy or Print $ 0.15
Color Copy or Print $ 0.50
11 x 17 Copy or Print $ 0.30
Internet session for extra time or those without Library cards $ 2.00 Image Archives High Resolution Electronic Files & Reprints $ 20.00

MEETING ROOM RESERVATION RATES
Room Rental Cancellation Fee
$ 25.00
Technology Package Fee $ 38.00
Deposit for MLK, Jr Auditorium $ 250.00
Deposit for all other meeting rooms $ 100.00
Main Library, 601 Santa Monica Blvd
Martin Luther King, Jr. Auditorium & Reception Room Use Martin Luther King, (MLK) Jr. Auditorium Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 240.00
Each Additional Hour $ 80.00
Piano Use $ 100.00
Security Staffing Fee Per Hour or Portion Thereof for use of Martin Luther King, Jr. Auditorium outside operating hours $ 70.00
Kitchen Use Per Hour or Portion Thereof $ 50.00
Multipurpose Room
Multipurpose Room Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 180.00
Each Additional Hour $ 60.00
Kitchen Use Per Hour or Portion Thereof $ 50.00
Community Meeting Room
Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 90.00
Each Additional Hour $ 30.00
Kitchen Use Per Hour or Portion Thereof $ 50.00
Fairview Branch Community Room, 2101 Ocean Park Blvd.

Fairview Branch Comm Room Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 90.00 Each Additional Hour $ 30.00
Security Staffing Fee Per Hour or Portion Thereof for use of branch meeting room outside operating hours $ 35.00
Montana Avenue Branch Community Room, 1704 Montana Avenue Montana Ave Branch Comm Room Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 90.00 Each Additional Hour $ 30.00
Security Staffing Fee Per Hour or Portion Thereof for use of branch meeting room outside operating hours $ 35.00
Ocean Park Branch Community Room, 2601 Main Street
Ocean Park Branch Comm Room Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 90.00 Each Additional Hour $ 30.00
Security Staffing Fee Per Hour or Portion Thereof for use of branch meeting room outside operating hours $ 35.00
Pico Branch Annex, 2201 Pico Blvd.

Pico Branch Annex Rental (2 Hour Minimum) $ 60.00
Each Additional Hour $ 30.00
Security Staffing Fee Per Hour or Portion Thereof for use of branch meeting room outside operating hours $ 35.00
Kitchen Use Per Hour or Portion Thereof $ 25.00
*These fees are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.* Library T-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery*
Service Effective
7-1-22
Ground Burial
Adult Grave (Single-Interment) $ 12,165.80
Adult Grave (Double Interment) $ 19,382.80
Adult Grave (Double-Interment Privilege) $ 12,165.80
Adult Green Burial Grave (Single-Interment) $ 14,019.64 Place Ashes in Existing Green Burial Plot $ 1,216.58
Infant Grave $ 633.41
Cremation Grave (Single) $ 5,979.80
Cremation Grave (Double) $ 10,103.80
Cremation Grave (Multiple Interment Privilege) $ 5,979.80 Cremation Green Burial Grave $ 11,234.80
Place Ashes in Existing Full Size Grave (Multiple Interment Privilege) $ 1,216.58 Crypt Spaces
Crypt (Single) Row 1 $ 18,003.04
Crypt (Single) Row 2 $ 20,003.37
Crypt (Single) Row 3 $ 20,003.37
Crypt (Single) Row 4 $ 18,003.04
Crypt (Single) Row 5 $ 11,335.23
Crypt (Single) Row 6 $ 10,001.67
Crypt (Single) Row 7 $ 10,001.67
Crypt (Double) Row 1 $ 25,604.32
Crypt (Double) Row 2 $ 32,272.12
Crypt (Double) Row 3 $ 32,272.12
Crypt (Double) Row 4 $ 25,604.32
Crypt (Double) Row 5 $ 18,936.53
Crypt (Double) Row 6 $ 17,602.97
Crypt (Double) Row 7 $ 17,602.97
Couch Crypt Row 1 $ 25,604.32
Couch Crypt Row 2 $ 32,272.12
Couch Crypt Row 3 $ 32,272.12
Couch Crypt Row 4 $ 25,604.32
Couch Crypt Row 5 $ 18,936.53
Couch Crypt Row 6 $ 17,602.97
Couch Crypt Row 7 $ 17,602.97
Place Ashes in Existing Crypt Interment Privilege $ 1,216.58 Niches
(Arbor View - Outdoor Niches)
Row 1 $ 3,467.24
Row 2 $ 5,067.50
Row 3 $ 5,334.22
Row 4 $ 5,334.22
(Faith)
Marble $ 1,608.04
V - 1
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
Small Glass - 11.5" L x 11" W x 6.5" H $ 3,015.05
Medium Glass - 11.5" L x 11" W x 14" H $ 5,829.13
Large Glass - 23.5" L x 11" W x 14" H $ 7,973.18
(Hope)
Marble $ 1,608.04
Small Glass - 11.5" L x 11" W x 6.5" H $ 3,015.05
Medium Glass - 11.5" L x 11" W x 14" H $ 5,829.13
Large Glass - 23.5" L x 11" W x 14" H $ 7,973.18
(Sanctuary of Devotion)
Large 26 inch (Outside View) Rows 3-5 $ 16,318.11
Large 26 inch (Outside View) Rows 6-8 $ 14,128.53
Large 23 inch $ 8,522.96
Large 20 inch (Outside View) $ 10,822.94
Corner $ 7,594.97
Medium Rows 1-6 $ 5,411.46
Medium Rows 7-8 $ 4,895.90
(Library of Living Memories)
Rows 1-8 $ 2,133.67
Row 9 $ 1,800.29
(Heavenly Gate)
Marble $ 2,144.04
Top Row $ 3,015.05
Medium Glass $ 5,829.13
Large Glass $ 7,973.18
Niches (Precious/Cherish)
Glass $ 2,133.67
Marble $ 1,800.29
Bayview (Newly developed cremation niche spaces 2011)
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Single (A,B,C,D,E,O)
Row 7 $ 3,333.88
Row 6 $ 5,334.22
Row 5 $ 5,600.92
Row 4 $ 5,867.64
Row 3 $ 5,867.64
Row 2 $ 5,600.92
Row 1 $ 4,000.66
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Wide Single (H,S,U)
Row 6 $ 8,001.34
Row 3 $ 8,801.47
Row 2 $ 8,401.41
Row 1 $ 6,001.00
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Double (L)
Row 6 $ 10,668.46
V - 2
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
Row 5 $ 11,201.87
Row 4 $ 11,735.30
Row 3 $ 11,735.30
Row 2 $ 11,201.87
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Double (M, Outside Glass
Row 6 $ 12,002.02
Row 5 $ 12,535.44
Row 4 $ 13,068.86
Row 3 $ 13,068.86
Row 2 $ 12,535.44
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Feature (R)
Row 4 $ 30,138.42
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Single (T) Outside Glass
Row 6 $ 6,001.00
Row 5 $ 6,267.70
Row 4 $ 6,534.42
Row 3 $ 6,534.42
Row 2 $ 6,267.70
Niches (Bay View Columbarium Entry) Feature (P)
Row 4 $ 22,937.21
Row 3 $ 22,937.21
Row 2 $ 22,937.21
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Feature (K)
Row 3 $ 41,873.75
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Wide Single Angle Corner (G,H) Row 7 $ 5,267.53
Row 6 $ 8,268.06
Row 5 $ 8,668.12
Row 4 $ 9,068.19
Row 3 $ 9,068.19
Row 2 $ 8,668.12
Row 1 $ 6,267.70
(Bay View Columbarium Vault) (Elevations 4,9)
Row 7 $ 3,067.17
Row 6 $ 5,067.50
Row 5 $ 5,334.22
Row 4 $ 5,600.92
Row 3 $ 5,600.92
Row 2 $ 5,334.22
Row 1 $ 3,733.94
(Bay View Columbarium Vault) Wide Single (H)
Row 6 $ 7,734.62
V - 3
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
(Bay View Columbarium Vault) Double (L)
Row 6 $ 10,401.73
Row 2 $ 10,935.17
(Bay View Columbarium Vault) Feature (N)
Row 3 $ 41,607.04
(Bay View Columbarium Alcove) (Elevations 6,7,8) Single (B,D) Row 7 $ 2,800.46
Row 6 $ 4,800.78
Row 5 $ 5,067.50
Row 4 $ 5,334.22
Row 3 $ 5,334.22
Row 2 $ 5,067.50
Row 1 $ 3,467.24
(Bay View Columbarium Alcove) Wide Single (H)
Row 6 $ 7,467.91
Row 3 $ 8,268.06
Row 2 $ 7,867.98
(Bay View Columbarium Alcove) Double (L)
Row 5 $ 10,668.46
Row 4 $ 11,201.87
Row 3 $ 11,201.87
(Bay View Columbarium Alcove) Feature (R)
Row 4 $ 29,338.30
(Bay View Columbarium Alcove) Wide Single Inside Corner (G, Row 7 $ 4,734.12
Row 6 $ 7,734.62
Row 5 $ 8,134.70
Row 4 $ 8,534.76
Row 3 $ 8,534.76
Row 2 $ 8,134.70
(Bay View Columbarium Family Alcove) Single (F)
Row 5 $ 3,867.30
Row 1 $ 3,867.30
(Bay View Columbarium Family Alcove) Feature (Q)
Row 4 $ 24,137.41
Row 3 $ 24,137.41
Row 2 $ 24,137.41

ENDOWMENT CARE
V - 4
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
Endowment Care (All interment spaces, except green burial graves) 25% of the cost of the interment
space.

Endowment Care (Green burial graves) 35% of the cost of the interment
space.

CEMETERY MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES
Opening and Closing (Adult Grave) per casket $ 1,213.51 Opening and Closing (Crypt) per casket or urn $ 913.47
Opening and Closing (Niche) per urn $ 126.66
Opening and Closing (Cremation Grave) per urn $ 382.24
Opening and Closing (Infant Grave) per casket $ 382.24
Administrative $ 140.00
Witnessed Lowering $ 460.05
Graveside Set-up/Equip. $ 418.49
Cryptside Set-up/Equip. $ 357.82
Nicheside Set-Up/Equip. $ 303.24
Disinterment (Adult Grave) $ 1,666.93
Disinterment (Cremation Grave) $ 749.45
Disinterment (Infant Grave) $ 749.45
Disinterment (Crypt) $ 819.75
Disinterment (Niche) $ 66.66
Marker Installation (Adult Grave) $ 566.74
Marker Installation (Crypt) $ 186.68
Marker Installation (Niche) $ 126.66
Upright Monument Installation $ 1,133.50
Memorial Tablet Installation $ 2,267.03
Single Sandblasting for Crypt Front $ 466.73
Double Sandblasting for Crypt Front $ 600.09

MORTUARY CHARGES
Basic Services of Funeral Director and Staff $ 1,726.93 Embalming $ 676.03
Special Care of autopsied remains $ 250.01
Harvest repair $ 408.27
Pacemaker removal $ 66.66
Other preparation of the remains $ 324.03
Identification/viewing of un-embalmed remains (30-minutes) $ 231.97 Dressing and casketing of unembalmed remains $ 262.90
Refrigeration of remains $ 676.03
V - 5
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
Transfer of remains to funeral home (Residence removal or second attendant, add $95.00) (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile) $ 793.45
Funeral Coach (Hearse) 4 hours (Each additional hour charged at $150 per hour) (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile) $ 822.73
8 Pass Limo - 4 hours (Each additional hour charged at $150 per hour) (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile)
$ 912.43
10 Pass Limo - 4 hours (Each additional hour charged at $150 per hour) (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile)
$ 952.64
Flower Van - 4 hours (Each additional hour charged at $150 per hour) (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile)
$ 519.62
Additional livery charges to Riverside National Cemetery $ 200.01 Foreign Consulate office visit $ 400.05
Transfer of remains to place of autopsy and return to funeral home (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile)
$ 303.24
Delivery of casketed remains to residence for viewing (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile)
$ 400.05
Use of staff for viewing $ 631.85
Use of staff for funeral ceremony $ 756.31
Use of staff for memorial service (no casket present) $ 677.02 Additional evening service $ 916.60
Use of equipment and Staff for graveside ceremony $ 521.51 Charge for any ceremony held on weekend $ 1,455.65
Re-filing of permit or affidavit preparation $ 200.01
Use of Audio Visual Equipment $ 545.86
Scattering at sea (unwitnessed) $ 197.02
Direct Cremation
This charge is for the cremation process wherein no services, ceremonies, or viewings will be held for the decedent. Also included is a minimum cremation container that meets crematory requirements. This charge does not include scattering at sea or other disposition of the cremated remains.
$ 1,600.25
Immediate Burial
This charge is for the immediate burial at the Woodlawn Cemetery or other cemetery within 30 miles of Woodlawn Cemetery wherein no services, ceremonies, or viewings will be held for the decedent. This charge does not include the price of a casket.
$ 3,042.18
V - 6
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
Forwarding Remains to another funeral home.

This charge includes basic services of funeral director and staff, a proportionate share of overhead costs, transfer of remains to Woodlawn, securing and filing necessary certificates and permits, embalming or other preparation of remains, and delivery to Los Angeles International Airport (The permit, combo shipping unit or air
tray, additional services and casket are not included). $ 2,900.05
Receiving remains from another funeral home.

This charge includes basic services of funeral director and staff, a proportionate share of overhead costs, transfer of remains to Woodlawn, securing and filing necessary certificates and permits. (Additional services, casket, and other merchandise not included). $ 2,313.12
Infant Burial - Includes Non-Viewing Graveside Ceremony, basic services of funeral director and staff, transfer of remains to mortuary, embalming or refrigeration, dressing, cosmetics, and casketing, use of staff and/or equipment for graveside ceremony
(on-site).
$ 1,521.09

CEMETERY MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES
Temporary Marker Placement $ 91.10
Oversized marker/Upright Monument Removal Fee $ 278.04
Witness Marker Installation $ 139.02
Chapel Fee $ 620.57

MORTUARY CHARGES
Refrigeration of remains (beyond 21 days, charged an additional $22.54 per day)
$ 22.54
V - 7
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Appendix
1- Revised Fire Department Fees

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Fire Department User Fee Study
In FY 2020-21, the City conducted a comprehensive citywide fees study that was presented to Council at the May 25, 2021 Budget Study Session. That study excluded the Fire Department fees because of pending staff changes. Staff was to complete the Fire Department study during fiscal year 2021-22 and return to Council with the proposed fee changes as part of the FY 2022-23 Proposed Budget.

The Fire Department fee study proposes to increase 25 fees, decrease 76 fees, and create 14 new fees, to set the fees at the appropriate cost recovery level (in most cases 100% of the costs to provide the service). The fee adjustments are a result of more efficient processes and changing workflows resulting from department restructuring, legislative requirements, and more accurate calculations of the full costs to provide services. The proposed new fees are primarily for services the City has provided without recovering costs, as well as fees to meet legal requirements. Additionally, two fees for services no longer provided or redundant with other fees are proposed for deletion.

The following table lists the proposed new fees. Further detail on all other fee changes is included in the User Fee Study Summary sheet. The fee changes will be included in the City’s master fee resolution, which will be presented to Council for approval at the time of budget adoption.

Fire Department Proposed New Fees
Ord
(used to identify
the fee in the
summary sheet
Service Name Fee
Description
Recommended
Amount
Primary
Impact
Purpose for Fee
19 Fire Sprinkler
monitoring alarm
system
New flat fee $443.87 Developers and
Businesses
This new fee is for the code
compliance review of fire
sprinkler monitoring alarm
systems.
28 AST
Install: generator
belly tank
New flat fee $315.04 Businesses This new fee is for
inspection of aboveground
installation of a generator
belly tank.
37 Emergency
responder radio
system
New flat fee $2,502.02 Developers and
Businesses
This new fee is for review of
new construction permits
for emergency responder
radio systems.
38 Emergency
responder radio
rental
New - rental $100.00 Developers and
Businesses
This new fee is for rental of
Fire Department equipment
to test a building's
emergency response radio
system.
39 Battery systems New flat fee $1,103.29 Developers and Businesses
This new fee is for the
inspection of battery
systems in new and existing
construction.
40 Gas detection
system
New flat fee $1,041.30 Developers and
Businesses
This new fee is for the
inspection of gas detection
systems in new
construction.

Appendix 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Fire Department Proposed New Fees
Ord
(used to identify
the fee in the
summary sheet
Service Name Fee
Description
Recommended
Amount
Primary
Impact
Purpose for Fee
84 Mixed use -
Business &
Mercantile
New flat fee $206.64 Businesses and
Residents
This new fee provides a
more detailed explanation
of services for a newer type
of mixed-use building. The
current fee is blended
under another fee's generic
line item.
85 Mixed use -
Residential
New flat fee $206.64 Businesses and
Residents
This new fee provides a
more detailed explanation
of services for a newer type
of mixed-use building. The
current fee is blended
under another fee's generic
line item.
97 Large Special Event
Review requiring
setup prior to day
of event (5 hour
minimum)
New - 5 Hour
minimum,
hourly
afterwards
$1,861.15 Developers and
Businesses
This new fee will allow an
hourly charge for any
additional time spent on a
large special event.
130 Final building
Inspection: R-3
New flat fee $194.64 Developers and
Businesses
This new fee is for R-3
building inspections, which
is not captured in the
current fee schedule.
146 Administrative
Costs: CUPA
Administrator
(each hour or
fraction)
New - Actual
Cost
Actual Cost Developers and
Businesses
This new fee will allow an
hourly charge for any
additional time spent on a
fee generating activity.
151 Outdoor Dining
Inspection Fee
New flat fee $186.49 Businesses This new fee is for outdoor dining inspections, which is
not captured in the current
fee schedule.
152 Special Event
Planning Fee (each
hour or fraction)
New - Hourly $367.76 Businesses This new fee is for planning services provided for special
events, which is not
captured in the current fee
schedule.
153 Presubmittal
Meetings with
Building & Safety
New - Hourly $183.88 Developers and
Businesses
This new fee is for plan
check pre-submittal
meetings with developers
and businesses, which is not
captured in the current fee
schedule.

Appendix 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP User Fee Study Summary Sheet
City of Santa Monica
Fire Department (190)
FY 2021/2022
Ord Service Name Fee Description Annual
Volume Current Fee Full Cost Full Cost with 3.1% COLA
Current
Recovery % Annual Cost Annual Revenue Annual Subsidy Recovery Level Fee @ Policy Level Fee with 3.1%
COLA
Annual
Revenue2
Increased
Revenue
Recommended
Subsidy
1 Standard/complex plan check-new building: 1st 2,500 sf Flat fee 15 $ 710.22 $ 673.33 $ 694.20 105% $ 10,413 $ 10,653 $ (240) 100% $ 673.33 $ 694.20 $ 10,413 $ (240) $ - 2 Standard/complex plan check-new building: >2,500 sf (per sf) Per sq ft (plus base
fee) 26 $ 0.07 $ 0.07 $ 0.07 105% $ 2 $ 2 $ (0) 100% $ 0.07 $ 0.07 $ 2 $ (0) $ - 3 Commercial Tenant Improvement: 1st 2,500 sf Flat fee 71 $ 355.11 $ 336.66 $ 347.10 105% $ 24,644 $ 25,213 $ (569) 100% $ 336.66 $ 347.10 $ 24,644 $ (569) $ - 4 Commercial Tenant Improvement: > 2,500 sf (per sf)
Per sq ft (plus base
fee) 90 $ 0.04 $ 0.03 $ 0.03 105% $ 3 $ 3 $ (0) 100% $ 0.03 $ 0.03 $ 3 $ (0) $ - 5 Miscellaneous plan review Hourly 150 $ 532.67 $ 336.66 $ 347.10 158% $ 52,065 $ 79,901 $ (27,835) 100% $ 336.66 $ 347.10 $ 52,065 $ (27,835) $ - 6 Solar panel plan review Flat fee 148 $ 277.25 $ 336.66 $ 347.10 82% $ 51,371 $ 41,033 $ 10,338 100% $ 336.66 $ 347.10 $ 51,371 $ 10,338 $ - 7 Fire Sprinkler - NFPA 13/13R Sys: 1-10 Heads Flat fee 56 $ 611.60 $ 430.53 $ 443.87 142% $ 24,857 $ 34,250 $ (9,393) 100% $ 430.53 $ 443.87 $ 24,857 $ (9,393) $ - 8 Fire Sprinkler - NFPA 13/13R Sys: 10+ Heads
Per sprinkler head
(plus base fee) 122 $ 5.60 $ 4.42 $ 4.56 127% $ 556 $ 683 $ (127) 100% $ 4.42 $ 4.56 $ 556 $ (127) $ - 9 Fire Sprinkler - NFPA 13D Sys: up to 10,000 sq ft Flat fee 90 $ 695.85 $ 430.53 $ 443.87 162% $ 39,949 $ 62,627 $ (22,678) 100% $ 430.53 $ 443.87 $ 39,949 $ (22,678) $ - 10 Fire Sprinkler - NFPA 13D Sys: >10,000 sq ft Flat fee 3 $ 864.37 $ 563.20 $ 580.66 153% $ 1,742 $ 2,593 $ (851) 100% $ 563.20 $ 580.66 $ 1,742 $ (851) $ - 11 Fire Sprinkler- NFPA 13D: TI Flat fee 3 $ 358.85 $ 297.85 $ 307.09 120% $ 921 $ 1,077 $ (155) 100% $ 297.85 $ 307.09 $ 921 $ (155) $ - 12 Fire Sprinklers: special high pile and sprinkler system combined Deposit/Actual Cost - $ 1,000.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 13 Private hydrant systems Actual Cost - $ 611.60 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 14 Fire pump installation Flat fee 4 $ 2,128.13 $ 1,690.93 $ 1,743.35 126% $ 6,973 $ 8,513 $ (1,539) 100% $ 1,690.93 $ 1,743.35 $ 6,973 $ (1,539) $ - 15 Fire Alarms, new system, 1st 24 Devices Flat fee 12 $ 1,348.02 $ 961.22 $ 991.02 140% $ 11,892 $ 16,176 $ (4,284) 100% $ 961.22 $ 991.02 $ 11,892 $ (4,284) $ - 16 Fire Alarms, new system, each additional device over 24 devices per device (plus
base fee) 17 $ 11.23 $ 13.27 $ 13.68 85% $ 233 $ 191 $ 42 100% $ 13.27 $ 13.68 $ 233 $ 42 $ - 17 Fire alarms, TI's, 1st 24 devices Flat fee 92 $ 780.11 $ 629.54 $ 649.05 124% $ 59,713 $ 71,770 $ (12,057) 100% $ 629.54 $ 649.05 $ 59,713 $ (12,057) $ - 18 Fire alarms, TI's, each additional device over 24 devices per device (plus
base fee) 33 $ 11.23 $ 13.27 $ 13.68 85% $ 451 $ 371 $ 81 100% $ 13.27 $ 13.68 $ 451 $ 81 $ - 19 Fire Sprinkler monitoring alarm system New flat fee 35 $ - $ 430.53 $ 443.87 0% $ 15,536 $ - $ 15,536 100% $ 430.53 $ 443.87 $ 15,536 $ 15,536 $ - 20 Fire Alarms, fire panel replacement Flat fee 7 $ 190.34 $ 297.85 $ 307.09 64% $ 2,150 $ 1,332 $ 817 100% $ 297.85 $ 307.09 $ 2,150 $ 817 $ - 21 Special fire extinguisher systems - clean agent Flat fee 7 $ 1,117.11 $ 894.89 $ 922.63 125% $ 6,458 $ 7,820 $ (1,361) 100% $ 894.89 $ 922.63 $ 6,458 $ (1,361) $ - 22 Special fire extinguisher systems - (eg kitchen hoods) Flat fee 24 $ 780.11 $ 629.54 $ 649.05 124% $ 15,577 $ 18,723 $ (3,145) 100% $ 629.54 $ 649.05 $ 15,577 $ (3,145) $ - 23 Medical lab: gas systems (type 1) Flat fee 1 $ 1,175.98 $ 705.83 $ 727.71 167% $ 728 $ 1,176 $ (448) 100% $ 705.83 $ 727.71 $ 728 $ (448) $ - 24 Medical lab: gas systems (type 2 & 3) Flat fee 1 $ 1,886.21 $ 1,715.83 $ 1,769.02 110% $ 1,769 $ 1,886 $ (117) 100% $ 1,715.83 $ 1,769.02 $ 1,769 $ (117) $ - 25 Storage tank above ground - install Flat fee 1 $ 1,264.75 $ 817.55 $ 842.89 155% $ 843 $ 1,265 $ (422) 100% $ 817.55 $ 842.89 $ 843 $ (422) $ - 26 Storage tank above ground - removal Flat fee 1 $ 998.42 $ 341.32 $ 351.90 293% $ 352 $ 998 $ (647) 100% $ 341.32 $ 351.90 $ 352 $ (647) $ - 27 Storage tank above ground - modify Flat fee 1 $ 732.08 $ 204.79 $ 211.14 357% $ 211 $ 732 $ (521) 100% $ 204.79 $ 211.14 $ 211 $ (521) $ - 28 AST Install: generator belly tank New flat fee 5 $ - $ 305.56 $ 315.04 0% $ 1,575 $ - $ 1,575 100% $ 305.56 $ 315.04 $ 1,575 $ 1,575 $ - 29 Storage tank underground install - base fee Flat fee 1 $ 2,966.90 $ 1,806.43 $ 1,862.43 164% $ 1,862 $ 2,967 $ (1,104) 100% $ 1,806.43 $ 1,862.43 $ 1,862 $ (1,104) $ - 30 Storage tank underground install - each additional tank per tank (plus base
fee) 1 $ 647.47 $ 412.54 $ 425.33 157% $ 425 $ 647 $ (222) 100% $ 412.54 $ 425.33 $ 425 $ (222) $ - 31 Storage tank underground install - each additional plan check or inspection
per pln chk or insp
(plus base fee) 1 $ 323.73 $ 165.02 $ 170.13 196% $ 170 $ 324 $ (154) 100% $ 165.02 $ 170.13 $ 170 $ (154) $ - 32 Storage tank underground removal - base fee Flat fee 2 $ 2,481.29 $ 1,600.16 $ 1,649.76 155% $ 3,300 $ 4,963 $ (1,663) 100% $ 1,600.16 $ 1,649.76 $ 3,300 $ (1,663) $ - 33 Storage tank underground removal - each additional tank per tank (plus base
fee) 1 $ 485.61 $ 330.03 $ 340.26 147% $ 340 $ 486 $ (145) 100% $ 330.03 $ 340.26 $ 340 $ (145) $ - 34 Storage tank underground removal - each additional plan check or inspection
per pln chk or insp
(plus base fee) 1 $ 323.73 $ 165.02 $ 170.13 196% $ 170 $ 324 $ (154) 100% $ 165.02 $ 170.13 $ 170 $ (154) $ - 35 Storage tank underground modify - simple Per tank - $ 507.45 $ 247.52 $ 255.20 205% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 247.52 $ 255.20 $ - $ - $ - 36 Storage tank underground modify - complex Per tank 2 $ 1,964.29 $ 907.59 $ 935.72 216% $ 1,871 $ 3,929 $ (2,057) 100% $ 907.59 $ 935.72 $ 1,871 $ (2,057) $ - 37 Emergency responder radio system New flat fee 9 $ - $ 2,426.79 $ 2,502.02 0% $ 22,518 $ - $ 22,518 100% $ 2,426.79 $ 2,502.02 $ 22,518 $ 22,518 $ - 38 Emergency responder radio rental New - rental - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ - $ - $ - 39 Battery systems New flat fee 2 $ - $ 1,070.11 $ 1,103.29 0% $ 2,207 $ - $ 2,207 100% $ 1,070.11 $ 1,103.29 $ 2,207 $ 2,207 $ - 40 Gas detection system New flat fee 1 $ - $ 1,009.99 $ 1,041.30 0% $ 1,041 $ - $ 1,041 100% $ 1,009.99 $ 1,041.30 $ 1,041 $ 1,041 $ - 41 Annual Permit - aircraft refueling facility Flat fee 2 $ 358.85 $ 330.03 $ 340.26 109% $ 681 $ 718 $ (37) 100% $ 330.03 $ 340.26 $ 681 $ (37) $ - Annual
Current Recommendations
Per Unit Annual Per Unit
Appendix 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP User Fee Study Summary Sheet
City of Santa Monica
Fire Department (190)
FY 2021/2022
Ord Service Name Fee Description Annual
Volume Current Fee Full Cost Full Cost with 3.1% COLA
Current
Recovery % Annual Cost Annual Revenue Annual Subsidy Recovery Level Fee @ Policy Level Fee with 3.1%
COLA
Annual
Revenue2
Increased
Revenue
Recommended
Subsidy
Annual
Current Recommendations
Per Unit Annual Per Unit
42 Annual Permit - aircraft repair hangar Flat fee - $ 358.85 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 43 Annual Permit - approved production facilities Flat fee 4 $ 358.85 $ 315.86 $ 325.65 114% $ 1,303 $ 1,435 $ (133) 100% $ 315.86 $ 325.65 $ 1,303 $ (133) $ - 44 Annual Permit - candles open flame annual Flat fee 50 $ 218.43 $ 37.32 $ 38.47 585% $ 1,924 $ 10,922 $ (8,998) 100% $ 37.32 $ 38.47 $ 1,924 $ (8,998) $ - 45 Seasonal Permit - carnivals or fairs Flat fee 12 $ 358.85 $ 140.57 $ 144.93 255% $ 1,739 $ 4,306 $ (2,567) 100% $ 140.57 $ 144.93 $ 1,739 $ (2,567) $ - 46 Seasonal Permit - Christmas tree lots Flat fee 2 $ 358.85 $ 300.03 $ 309.33 120% $ 619 $ 718 $ (99) 100% $ 300.03 $ 309.33 $ 619 $ (99) $ - 47 Annual Permit - combustible dust products Flat fee 1 $ 358.85 $ 171.40 $ 176.71 209% $ 177 $ 359 $ (182) 100% $ 171.40 $ 176.71 $ 177 $ (182) $ - 48 Annual Permit - combustible fibers Flat fee 1 $ 358.85 $ 171.40 $ 176.71 209% $ 177 $ 359 $ (182) 100% $ 171.40 $ 176.71 $ 177 $ (182) $ - 49 Annual Permit - combustible materials Flat fee 1 $ 358.85 $ 171.40 $ 176.71 209% $ 177 $ 359 $ (182) 100% $ 171.40 $ 176.71 $ 177 $ (182) $ - 50 Annual Permit - explosives Flat fee - $ 358.85 $ 270.31 $ 278.69 133% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 270.31 $ 278.69 $ - $ - $ - 51 Annual Permit - high piled combustible storage Flat fee - $ 358.85 $ 203.91 $ 210.23 176% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 203.91 $ 210.23 $ - $ - $ - 52 Annual Permit - hot work open flame Flat fee 9 $ 358.85 $ 171.40 $ 176.71 209% $ 1,590 $ 3,230 $ (1,639) 100% $ 171.40 $ 176.71 $ 1,590 $ (1,639) $ - 53 Annual Permit - industrial ovens Flat fee 3 $ 358.85 $ 171.40 $ 176.71 209% $ 530 $ 1,077 $ (546) 100% $ 171.40 $ 176.71 $ 530 $ (546) $ - 54 Annual Permit - laboratory Flat fee - $ 358.85 $ 171.40 $ 176.71 209% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 171.40 $ 176.71 $ - $ - $ - 55 Annual Permit - LPG - annual Flat fee 60 $ 358.85 $ 171.40 $ 176.71 209% $ 10,603 $ 21,531 $ (10,928) 100% $ 171.40 $ 176.71 $ 10,603 $ (10,928) $ - 56 Annual Permit - public assembly, < 300 occupants Flat fee 185 $ 484.22 $ 345.71 $ 356.43 140% $ 65,939 $ 89,581 $ (23,642) 100% $ 345.71 $ 356.43 $ 65,939 $ (23,642) $ - 57 Annual Permit - public assembly, 300+ occupants Flat fee 50 $ 638.35 $ 483.78 $ 498.78 132% $ 24,939 $ 31,918 $ (6,979) 100% $ 483.78 $ 498.78 $ 24,939 $ (6,979) $ - 58 Annual Permit - repair garage Flat fee 3 $ 376.96 $ 174.46 $ 179.87 216% $ 540 $ 1,131 $ (591) 100% $ 174.46 $ 179.87 $ 540 $ (591) $ - 59 Annual Permit - spraying/dipping Flat fee 8 $ 358.85 $ 203.91 $ 210.23 176% $ 1,682 $ 2,871 $ (1,189) 100% $ 203.91 $ 210.23 $ 1,682 $ (1,189) $ - 60 Ambulatory surgical center: I-2.1 Flat fee 4 $ 638.35 $ 539.75 $ 556.49 118% $ 2,226 $ 2,553 $ (327) 100% $ 539.75 $ 556.49 $ 2,226 $ (327) $ - 61 Convalescent Hospital, Assistive Living and Social Rehab Flat fee 14 $ 946.61 $ 595.73 $ 614.20 159% $ 8,599 $ 13,253 $ (4,654) 100% $ 595.73 $ 614.20 $ 8,599 $ (4,654) $ - 62 Adult & Child Daycare under 50 occupants Flat fee 11 $ 253.03 $ 315.86 $ 325.65 80% $ 3,582 $ 2,783 $ 799 100% $ 315.86 $ 325.65 $ 3,582 $ 799 $ - 63 Adult & Child Daycare 50 or more occupants Flat fee 6 $ 484.22 $ 427.80 $ 441.07 113% $ 2,646 $ 2,905 $ (259) 100% $ 427.80 $ 441.07 $ 2,646 $ (259) $ - 64 Hospital: I-2 Flat fee 24 $ 1,254.87 $ 1,067.11 $ 1,100.19 118% $ 26,405 $ 30,117 $ (3,712) 100% $ 1,067.11 $ 1,100.19 $ 26,405 $ (3,712) $ - 65 Large Family Day Care Flat fee 13 $ 330.10 $ 259.88 $ 267.94 127% $ 3,483 $ 4,291 $ (808) 100% $ 259.88 $ 267.94 $ 3,483 $ (808) $ - 66 Public/private school Group E less than 10,000 sq. ft. Flat fee 30 $ 946.61 $ 427.80 $ 441.07 221% $ 13,232 $ 28,398 $ (15,166) 100% $ 427.80 $ 441.07 $ 13,232 $ (15,166) $ - 67 Public/private school Group E 10,000 sq. ft or more Flat fee 15 $ 946.61 $ 763.65 $ 787.33 124% $ 11,810 $ 14,199 $ (2,389) 100% $ 763.65 $ 787.33 $ 11,810 $ (2,389) $ - 68 Assisted Living and Social Rehab: R-4 Flat fee 35 $ 638.35 $ 427.80 $ 441.07 149% $ 15,437 $ 22,342 $ (6,905) 100% $ 427.80 $ 441.07 $ 15,437 $ (6,905) $ - 69 Other inspections - annual not otherwise listed Actual Cost - $ 358.85 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 70 Annual commercial inspections: individual suite or unit, 0-500 sf Flat fee 371 $ 25.93 $ 103.58 $ 106.79 25% $ 39,618 $ 9,620 $ 29,998 100% $ 103.58 $ 106.79 $ 39,618 $ 29,998 $ - 71 Annual commercial inspections: individual suite or unit, 501-2,000 sf Flat fee 1,174 $ 121.53 $ 157.56 $ 162.44 77% $ 190,708 $ 142,676 $ 48,032 100% $ 157.56 $ 162.44 $ 190,708 $ 48,032 $ - 72 Annual commercial inspections: individual suite or unit, 2,001-5,000 sf Flat fee 429 $ 160.45 $ 214.25 $ 220.90 75% $ 94,764 $ 68,833 $ 25,931 100% $ 214.25 $ 220.90 $ 94,764 $ 25,931 $ - 73 Annual commercial inspections: individual suite or unit, 5,001- 10,000 sf Flat fee 167 $ 199.37 $ 271.07 $ 279.47 74% $ 46,671 $ 33,295 $ 13,377 100% $ 271.07 $ 279.47 $ 46,671 $ 13,377 $ - 74 Annual commercial inspections: individual suite or unit, >10,000 sf Flat fee 215 $ 277.22 $ 398.69 $ 411.05 70% $ 88,376 $ 59,602 $ 28,774 100% $ 398.69 $ 411.05 $ 88,376 $ 28,774 $ - 75 Annual commercial inspections - common area: base 1st story (includes single story buildings) Flat fee 8 $ 82.62 $ 69.40 $ 71.55 119% $ 572 $ 661 $ (89) 100% $ 69.40 $ 71.55 $ 572 $ (89) $ - 76 Annual commercial inspections - common area: 0-2,000 sf per floor Flat fee 6 $ 82.62 $ 92.53 $ 95.40 89% $ 572 $ 496 $ 77 100% $ 92.53 $ 95.40 $ 572 $ 77 $ - 77 Annual commercial inspections - common area: 2,001-5,000 sf per floor Flat fee 2 $ 95.58 $ 127.23 $ 131.17 75% $ 262 $ 191 $ 71 100% $ 127.23 $ 131.17 $ 262 $ 71 $ - 78 floor Flat fee 1 $ 108.56 $ 231.33 $ 238.50 47% $ 238 $ 109 $ 130 100% $ 231.33 $ 238.50 $ 238 $ 130 $ - 79 Annual commercial inspections - common area: >10,001 sq ft Flat fee 3 $ 121.53 $ 300.73 $ 310.05 40% $ 930 $ 365 $ 566 100% $ 300.73 $ 310.05 $ 930 $ 566 $ - 80 Annual multi-family residential inspections: 3-15 units Flat fee 3,379 $ 141.35 $ 160.02 $ 164.98 88% $ 557,474 $ 477,622 $ 79,852 100% $ 160.02 $ 164.98 $ 557,474 $ 79,852 $ - 81 Annual multi-family residential inspections: 16-49 units Flat fee 405 $ 190.20 $ 228.60 $ 235.68 83% $ 95,451 $ 77,031 $ 18,420 100% $ 228.60 $ 235.68 $ 95,451 $ 18,420 $ - 82 Annual multi-family residential inspections: 50-99 units Flat fee 31 $ 239.03 $ 338.04 $ 348.52 71% $ 10,804 $ 7,410 $ 3,394 100% $ 338.04 $ 348.52 $ 10,804 $ 3,394 $ - Appendix 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP User Fee Study Summary Sheet
City of Santa Monica
Fire Department (190)
FY 2021/2022
Ord Service Name Fee Description Annual
Volume Current Fee Full Cost Full Cost with 3.1% COLA
Current
Recovery % Annual Cost Annual Revenue Annual Subsidy Recovery Level Fee @ Policy Level Fee with 3.1%
COLA
Annual
Revenue2
Increased
Revenue
Recommended
Subsidy
Annual
Current Recommendations
Per Unit Annual Per Unit
83 Annual multi-family residential inspections: 100 units and over Flat fee 11 $ 336.71 $ 459.82 $ 474.07 73% $ 5,215 $ 3,704 $ 1,511 100% $ 459.82 $ 474.07 $ 5,215 $ 1,511 $ - 84 Mixed use - Business & Mercantile New flat fee 90 $ - $ 200.43 $ 206.64 0% $ 18,598 $ - $ 18,598 100% $ 200.43 $ 206.64 $ 18,598 $ 18,598 $ - 85 Mixed use - Residential New flat fee 90 $ - $ 200.43 $ 206.64 0% $ 18,598 $ - $ 18,598 100% $ 200.43 $ 206.64 $ 18,598 $ 18,598 $ - 86 High rise fire inspections - Commercial, R-1, R-2, 55-75 ft Flat fee 41 $ 2,065.74 $ 1,515.21 $ 1,562.18 136% $ 64,049 $ 84,695 $ (20,646) 100% $ 1,515.21 $ 1,562.18 $ 64,049 $ (20,646) $ - 87 High rise fire inspections - Commercial, R-1, R-2, > 75 ft Flat fee 39 $ 2,739.75 $ 2,013.06 $ 2,075.46 136% $ 80,943 $ 106,850 $ (25,907) 100% $ 2,013.06 $ 2,075.46 $ 80,943 $ (25,907) $ - 88 Tents & Canopies 401-2000 sq ft Flat fee 47 $ 228.98 $ 210.86 $ 217.39 109% $ 10,218 $ 10,762 $ (545) 100% $ 210.86 $ 217.39 $ 10,218 $ (545) $ - 89 Tents & Canopies 2,001-5,000 sq ft Flat fee 35 $ 332.55 $ 300.03 $ 309.33 111% $ 10,827 $ 11,639 $ (813) 100% $ 300.03 $ 309.33 $ 10,827 $ (813) $ - 90 Tents & Canopies > 5,000 sq ft Per sq ft 28 $ 0.09 $ 0.06 $ 0.06 151% $ 2 $ 2 $ (1) 100% $ 0.06 $ 0.06 $ 2 $ (1) $ - 91 Candles open flame - special event Flat fee 45 $ 65.54 $ 151.41 $ 156.10 43% $ 7,025 $ 2,949 $ 4,075 100% $ 151.41 $ 156.10 $ 7,025 $ 4,075 $ - 92 LPG special event Flat fee 67 $ 228.98 $ 110.85 $ 114.28 207% $ 7,657 $ 15,342 $ (7,685) 100% $ 110.85 $ 114.28 $ 7,657 $ (7,685) $ - 93 Vehicle in building - special event Flat fee 3 $ 228.98 $ 121.68 $ 125.45 188% $ 376 $ 687 $ (311) 100% $ 121.68 $ 125.45 $ 376 $ (311) $ - 94 Studio & theater occupancies - pyrotechnic SFX app sound stage Flat fee 12 $ 1,264.75 $ 745.91 $ 769.04 170% $ 9,228 $ 15,177 $ (5,949) 100% $ 745.91 $ 769.04 $ 9,228 $ (5,949) $ - 95 Studio & theater pyrotechnic SFX - location filming Flat fee 12 $ 376.96 $ 389.21 $ 401.28 97% $ 4,815 $ 4,524 $ 292 100% $ 389.21 $ 401.28 $ 4,815 $ 292 $ - 96 Special event review Hourly 180 $ 243.09 $ 378.37 $ 390.10 64% $ 70,219 $ 14,585 $ 55,633 100% $ 378.37 $ 390.10 $ 70,219 $ 55,633 $ - 97 Large Special Event Review requiring setup prior to day of event (5 hour minimum)
New - 5 Hour
minimum, hourly
afterwards - $ - $ 1,805.19 $ 1,861.15 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 1,805.19 $ 1,861.15 $ - $ - $ - 98 Commercial umbrella permit Flat fee - $ 65.54 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 99 Other inspections - special events Flat fee 12 $ 358.85 $ 378.37 $ 390.10 95% $ 4,681 $ 4,306 $ 375 100% $ 378.37 $ 390.10 $ 4,681 $ 375 $ - 100 CUPA - city administrative fee - per CUPA Facility Flat fee 400 $ 663.17 $ 648.60 $ 668.71 102% $ 267,483 $ 265,268 $ 2,215 100% $ 648.60 $ 668.71 $ 267,483 $ 2,215 $ - 101 CRTK hazardous materials inspection - category 1A Flat fee 125 $ 177.55 $ 206.27 $ 212.66 86% $ 26,583 $ 22,194 $ 4,389 100% $ 206.27 $ 212.66 $ 26,583 $ 4,389 $ - 102 CRTK hazardous materials inspection - category 1B Flat fee 115 $ 355.11 $ 527.70 $ 544.06 67% $ 62,567 $ 40,838 $ 21,730 100% $ 527.70 $ 544.06 $ 62,567 $ 21,730 $ - 103 CRTK hazardous materials inspection - category 2 Flat fee 82 $ 710.22 $ 474.20 $ 488.90 150% $ 40,090 $ 58,238 $ (18,148) 100% $ 474.20 $ 488.90 $ 40,090 $ (18,148) $ - 104 CRTK hazardous materials inspection - category 3 Flat fee 18 $ 1,242.90 $ 596.76 $ 615.26 208% $ 11,075 $ 22,372 $ (11,298) 100% $ 596.76 $ 615.26 $ 11,075 $ (11,298) $ - 105 CRTK hazardous materials inspection - category 4 Flat fee 6 $ 1,775.58 $ 955.70 $ 985.33 186% $ 5,912 $ 10,653 $ (4,741) 100% $ 955.70 $ 985.33 $ 5,912 $ (4,741) $ - 106 CUPA - annual CalARP Review: level 1 - per facility Actual Cost - $ 974.59 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 107 CUPA - annual CalARP Review: level 2 - per facility Actual Cost - $ 1,624.32 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 108 CUPA - annual CalARP Review: level 3 - per facility Actual Cost - $ 3,248.66 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 109 CUPA - per facility, CalARP Review - add'l rev &insp Actual Cost - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 110
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County):
hazardous waste generation-silver waste only Pass through - $ 295.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Pass through to County -- 111
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County):
hazardous waste generation, 1-5 Employees Pass through - $ 590.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Pass through to County -- 112
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County):
hazardous waste generation, 6-19 Employees Pass through - $ 828.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Pass through to County -- 113
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County):
hazardous waste generation, 20-100 Employees Pass through - $ 1,131.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Pass through to County -- 114
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County):
hazardous waste generation, 101-500 Employees Pass through - $ 1,644.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Pass through to County -- 115
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County):
hazardous waste generation, 501 Employees and over Pass through - $ 2,815.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Pass through to County -- 116
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County):
hazardous waste generation/tiered permit-conditionally exempt Pass through - $ 139.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Pass through to County --
117
CUPA - county charges (passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation/tiered permit-conditionally authorized Pass through - $ 916.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Pass through to County --
118
CUPA - county charges (passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation/tiered permit-permit by rule Pass through - $ 1,308.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Pass through to County -- Appendix 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP User Fee Study Summary Sheet
City of Santa Monica
Fire Department (190)
FY 2021/2022
Ord Service Name Fee Description Annual
Volume Current Fee Full Cost Full Cost with 3.1% COLA
Current
Recovery % Annual Cost Annual Revenue Annual Subsidy Recovery Level Fee @ Policy Level Fee with 3.1%
COLA
Annual
Revenue2
Increased
Revenue
Recommended
Subsidy
Annual
Current Recommendations
Per Unit Annual Per Unit
119
CUPA - state underground storage tank administrative charges (passed by State): underground storage tank oversight State set charge - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Fee set by State -- 120
CUPA - State Administrative Surcharge (passed by State): all CUPA facilities State set charge - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Fee set by State -- 121
CUPA - state underground storage tank administrative charges (set by and passed through to LA County): CalARP, per facility State set charge - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Fee set by State -- 122
CUPA - state underground storage tank administrative charges (set by and passed through to LA County): Electronic Surcharge, per facility Pass through - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ -
-- Pass through to County --
123
CUPA - state aboveground tank administrative surcharge (passed through CA) State set charge - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Fee set by State -- 124 Aboveground Tank (AST < 10K gallon) Flat fee 30 $ 710.22 $ 330.03 $ 340.26 215% $ 10,208 $ 21,307 $ (11,099) 100% $ 330.03 $ 340.26 $ 10,208 $ (11,099) $ - 125 Aboveground Tank (AST > 10K gallon) Flat fee 1 $ 1,420.47 $ 618.81 $ 637.99 230% $ 638 $ 1,420 $ (782) 100% $ 618.81 $ 637.99 $ 638 $ (782) $ - 126 Underground Tank Permit (Base & 1st Tank) Flat fee 34 $ 2,428.05 $ 1,113.86 $ 1,148.39 218% $ 39,045 $ 82,554 $ (43,508) 100% $ 1,113.86 $ 1,148.39 $ 39,045 $ (43,508) $ - 127 Underground Tank Permit (ea add'l Tank)
per tank (plus base
fee) 43 $ 485.61 $ 247.52 $ 255.20 196% $ 10,973 $ 20,881 $ (9,908) 100% $ 247.52 $ 255.20 $ 10,973 $ (9,908) $ - 128 Underground Tank Permit (TIUGA) Flat fee 25 $ 485.61 $ 45.51 $ 46.92 1067% $ 1,173 $ 12,140 $ (10,967) 100% $ 45.51 $ 46.92 $ 1,173 $ (10,967) $ - 129 Final building inspection Flat fee 300 $ 611.60 $ 454.13 $ 468.21 135% $ 140,463 $ 183,480 $ (43,017) 100% $ 454.13 $ 468.21 $ 140,463 $ (43,017) $ - 130 Final building Inspection: R-3 New flat fee - $ - $ 188.78 $ 194.64 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 188.78 $ 194.64 $ - $ - $ - 131 Miscellaneous - alternate materials, design and methods Flat fee 5 $ 1,442.31 $ 1,735.52 $ 1,789.32 83% $ 8,947 $ 7,212 $ 1,735 100% $ 1,735.52 $ 1,789.32 $ 8,947 $ 1,735 $ - 132 Miscellaneous - compliance reinspections, resubmittals or retesting Flat fee 2 $ 358.85 $ 259.10 $ 267.13 138% $ 534 $ 718 $ (183) 100% $ 259.10 $ 267.13 $ 534 $ (183) $ - 133 Miscellaneous - inspection services Delete - $ 358.85 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Remove from fee schedule; duplicate of Fee #137 -- 134 Miscellaneous - special event inspection or special event review Flat fee 1 $ 358.85 $ 389.21 $ 401.28 92% $ 401 $ 359 $ 42 100% $ 389.21 $ 401.28 $ 401 $ 42 $ - 135
Miscellaneous - additional site inspection per additional floor, suite or area Flat fee 25 $ 358.85 $ 297.85 $ 307.09 120% $ 7,677 $ 8,971 $ (1,294) 100% $ 297.85 $ 307.09 $ 7,677 $ (1,294) $ - 136 Miscellaneous - off-hour inspection /expedited plan review 4-hour minimum,
hourly at OT rate
afterwards 172 $ 883.16 $ 551.63 $ 568.73 160% $ 97,821 $ 151,904 $ (54,083) 100% $ 551.63 $ 568.73 $ 94,880 $ (57,024) $ 2,941 137 Miscellaneous - uniform fire code permits, others Actual Cost 1 $ 323.60 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ 324 $ (324) 100% $ - $ - $ - $ (324) $ - 138 Reinspection Fee Actual Cost - $ 337.00 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 139 Reinspection, Environ & Safety Inspection Specialist Delete - $ 176.28 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 140
Advanced Life Support Assessment Fee (The difference between the Los Angeles County approved Advanced Life Support rate and the Los Angeles County Basic Life Support rate.) County Set Charge - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Fee set by County --
141 Code-3 Response Fee-Lights and Siren (The fee is set by LA County) County Set Charge - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Fee set by County -- 142 Administrative Costs: Fire Marshal (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 143 Administrative Costs: Assistant Fire Marshal (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 144 Administrative Costs: Senior Fire Inspector (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 145 Administrative Costs: Fire Inspector (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 146 Administrative Costs: CUPA Administrator (each hour or fraction) New - Actual Cost - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 147
Administrative Costs: Environmental & Safety Inspection Specialist (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 148
Administrative Costs: Fire Code Enforcemt Officer I/II (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 149
Fire Safety Officer Assignment, 4 hour minimum (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 150 Fire Safety Officer assignment vehicle fee Hourly - $ 66.40 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - -- Fee set by MOU; not analyzed -- Appendix 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP User Fee Study Summary Sheet
City of Santa Monica
Fire Department (190)
FY 2021/2022
Ord Service Name Fee Description Annual
Volume Current Fee Full Cost Full Cost with 3.1% COLA
Current
Recovery % Annual Cost Annual Revenue Annual Subsidy Recovery Level Fee @ Policy Level Fee with 3.1%
COLA
Annual
Revenue2
Increased
Revenue
Recommended
Subsidy
Annual
Current Recommendations
Per Unit Annual Per Unit
151 Outdoor Dining Inspection Fee New flat fee - $ - $ 180.89 $ 186.49 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 180.89 $ 186.49 $ - $ - $ - 152 Special Event Planning Fee (each hour or fraction) New - Hourly - $ - $ 356.70 $ 367.76 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 356.70 $ 367.76 $ - $ - $ - 153 Presubmittal Meetings with Building & Safety New - Hourly - $ - $ 178.35 $ 183.88 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 178.35 $ 183.88 $ - $ - $ - Total User Fees $2,637,590 $2,606,041 $31,549 $2,637,590 $31,549 $0 % of Full Cost 99% 1% 100% 1% 0%
Footnotes
Fee #97 - Adding fee for large special event reviews requiring setup prior to event Fees #84 and #85 - Adding new fees for mixed-use occupancy types Fee #86 and #87 - Changed fee description to clarify that all occupancy types are included.

Fee #130 - This fee is for the final fire inspection of single family residential construction projects (R-3). This separates out single family homes (R-3) as the field inspection and office time is less than a commercial project captured under Final Building Inspection.

Fee #137 - Changing this from a flat fee to actual cost.

Fee #153 - Adding an hourly fee for presubmittal meetings in coordination with Building and Safety staff and their customers.

Fee #138 - Change from two Reinspection fees for specific positions to one generic Reinspection Fee at actual cost.

Fee #146 - Adding an hourly fee for CUPA Administrator so all Fire Prevention positions are listed and can be charged if needed.

Fee #150 - Fire Safety Officer is voluntary and not assigned to any specific position. Fee to be calculated at fully burdened hourly rate of employee assigned.

Fee #151 - Adding a fee for inspection of outdoor dining areas or establishments.

Fee #152 - Adding an hourly fee for planning of special events.

Fee #40 - This fee is for a new fire code construction permit type for the installation of a gas detection system inside buildings when required by the fire department.

Fee #42 - This fee has had no activity in recent years. Recommend keeping fee set at current amount.

Fee #44 - Inspections of candles and open flames are done concurrently with other inspections.

Fee #69 - Changing from a flat fee to actual cost.

Fee #13 - Changing from a flat fee to actual cost.

Fee #19 - This fee is for a fire sprinkler monitoring fire alarm system that is less complex than a general fire alarm system Fee #28 - This fee adds another category for aboveground tanks.

Fees #37 and #38 - These fees are for a new fire code construction permit type for the installation of an emergency responder radio system in new buildings when required by the fire department, plus a fee for the rental of the radio if needed.

Fee #39 - This fee is for a new fire code construction permit type for the installation of battery backup systems inside for commercial buildings.

Appendix 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Appendix 2
- Revised Cemetery Fees

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Description (Fee
Name), Exhibit Title
or Notation
Current Fee
FY 2021-22
Proposed
Fee
FY 2022-23 Justification
New Fees
Chapel Fee 620.57 This fee used to be on the Comprehensive Price List in the past. If an outside firm wants to use the chapel for a
service, they will be charged for the use of the facility and equipment (podiums, microphones, AV, etc.).

Oversized Marker/
Upright Monument
Removal Fee
278.04 There is additional labor for second interments in locations where an upright or oversized marker is in place. Typically graves have a standard marker, but with the increase of upright and oversized markers staff determined the need to charge for this service.

Refrigeration of
Remains (Beyond
30 days, charged an
additional $21.86 per
day)

22.54 There has been an increase in storage of remains beyond 30 days. Disposition is normally completed within two
weeks. The extra time in the cooler takes up space,
requires the cooler to run, and in the event staff is busy it could result in contracting out for storage.

Temporary Marker
Placement

91.10 Markers are normally installed after the protective border has been fabricated. Families have been requesting to
temporarily place markers for special remembrances or
memorials. Due to the increase in requests, staff
determined the need to charge for this service.

Witness Marker
Installation
139.02 Markers are placed on graves in between staff's regular service schedule/workload. Witnessing the marker setting would mean the staff would need to pause their regular
work load and perform the installation at the required
time.

Adjustments (Increases)
Adult Grave (Double
Interment Privilege)
8,824.40 12,165.80 This item was overlooked in the FY 21-22 when the fees for single interment and double interment full-sized graves and cremation graves were adjusted. This fee is for
creating an additional grave in a gravesite, allowing for a second casketed interment. Proposed pricing is based on pricing structure of the fiscal years prior to FY 21-22 where the newly created second grave is equal in value to the cost of an adult grave single interment minus the
endowment care.

Cremation Grave
(Multiple Interment
Privilege)
3,880.37 5,979.80 This item was overlooked in the FY 21-22 when the fees for single interment and double interment full-sized graves and cremation graves were adjusted. This fee is for
creating the second additional grave in a cremation grave, allowing for the interment of a second set of cremated
remains. Proposed pricing is based on the pricing
structure of the fiscal years prior to FY 21-22 where this newly created second cremation grave is equal in value to the cost of a single cremation grave minus the
endowment care.

Appendix 2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Description (Fee
Name), Exhibit Title
or Notation
Current Fee
FY 2021-22
Proposed
Fee
FY 2022-23 Justification
Place Ashes in
Existing Crypt
Interment Privilege
882.43 1,216.58 This item was overlooked in the FY 21-22 when the fees for single interment and double interment full-sized graves and cremation graves were adjusted. This fee is for
adding a set of cremated remains to a previously
purchased crypt for one casketed interment. Proposed
pricing is based on the pricing structure of the fiscal years prior to FY 21-22 where the fee to add cremated remains to a crypt was one tenth of the cost of the adult grave double interment privilege. Fee is based on 1/10 of the single plot price.

Place Ashes in
Existing Full Size
Grave (Multiple
Interment Privilege)
882.43 1,216.58 This item was overlooked in the FY 21-22 when the fees for single interment and double interment full-sized graves and cremation graves were adjusted. This fee is for
adding a set of cremated remains to a previously
purchased adult grave single or double interment.

Proposed pricing is based on the pricing structure of the fiscal years prior to FY 21-22 where the fee to add
cremated remains to an adult grave for a casketed
interment was one tenth of the cost of the adult grave
double interment privilege. Fee is based on 1/10 of the single plot price.

Place Ashes in
Existing Green
Burial Plot
882.43 1,216.58 This item was overlooked in the FY 21-22 when the fees for single interment and double interment full-sized graves and cremation graves were adjusted. This fee is for
adding a set of cremated remains to a previously
purchased single green burial plot. Proposed pricing is based on the pricing structure of the fiscal years prior to FY 21-22 where the fee to add cremated remains to a single green burial plot for one casketed interment was one
tenth of the cost of the adult grave double interment
privilege. Fee is based on 1/10 of the single plot price.

Deletion
Adult Grave (Single
Interment) Financial
Hardship
1,552.14 Staff proposes removing this item from the
Comprehensive Price List. There is no longer inventory of these plots. There is dwindling inventory of cemetery plots in general. Also, staff has no way of determining if all financial records have been provided by clients claiming hardship. Loopholes exist where wealthy families can
claim someone as a hardship case because, for example,
the one person selected by the family as a client is not working, despite the wealth of the family. The City's
Finance Department has not provided guidelines for
determining which financial records should be obtained
from clients claiming hardship and for determining if all financial records have been provided by clients.
*A cemetery grave in designated cemetery blocks that
are intended for families facing financial hardships*
Appendix 2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Description (Fee
Name), Exhibit Title
or Notation
Current Fee
FY 2021-22
Proposed
Fee
FY 2022-23 Justification
Description Revision
Delivery of casketed
remains to
residence for
viewing (Beyond 30
miles, charged at
$3.00 per mile)
388.03 400.05 The Cemetery has proposed an increase in mileage to cover the vendor’s increased fees. Due to the increase in fuel costs, the vendor raised their prices on mileage above 30 miles.

Transfer of remains
to funeral home
(Residence removal
or second
attendant, add
$95.00) (Beyond 30
miles, charged at
$3.00 per mile)
769.60 793.45 The Cemetery has proposed an increase in mileage to cover the vendor’s increased fees. Due to the increase in fuel costs, the vendor raised their prices on mileage above 30 miles.

Funeral Coach
(Hearse) 4 hours
(Each additional
hour charged at
$150 per hour)
(Beyond 30 miles,
charged at $3.00
per mile)
$798.00 $822.7 The Cemetery has proposed an increase in mileage to cover the vendor’s increased fees. Due to the increase in fuel costs, the vendor raised their prices on mileage above 30 miles.
8 Pass Limo - 4
hours (Each
additional hour
charged at $150 per
hour) (Beyond 30
miles, charged at
$3.00 per mile)
$885.00 $912.43 The Cemetery has proposed an increase in mileage to cover the vendor’s increased fees. Due to the increase in fuel costs, the vendor raised their prices on mileage above 30 miles.
10 Pass Limo - 4
hours (Each
additional hour
charged at $150 per
hour) (Beyond 30
miles, charged at
$3.00 per mile)
$924.00 $952.64 The Cemetery has proposed an increase in mileage to cover the vendor’s increased fees. Due to the increase in fuel costs, the vendor raised their prices on mileage above 30 miles.

Flower Van - 4 hours
(Each additional
hour charged at
$150 per hour)
(Beyond 30 miles,
charged at $3.00
per mile)
$504.00 $519.62 The Cemetery has proposed an increase in mileage to cover the vendor’s increased fees. Due to the increase in fuel costs, the vendor raised their prices on mileage above 30 miles.

Appendix 2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Description (Fee
Name), Exhibit Title
or Notation
Current Fee
FY 2021-22
Proposed
Fee
FY 2022-23 Justification
Transfer of remains
to place of autopsy
and return to
funeral home
(Beyond 30 miles,
charged at $3.00
per mile)
$294.13 $303.24 The Cemetery has proposed an increase in mileage to cover the vendor’s increased fees. Due to the increase in fuel costs, the vendor raised their prices on mileage above 30 miles.

Delivery of casketed
remains to
residence for
viewing (Beyond 30
miles, charged at
$3.00 per mile)
$388.03 $400.05 The Cemetery has proposed an increase in mileage to cover the vendor’s increased fees. Due to the increase in fuel costs, the vendor raised their prices on mileage above 30 miles.

Appendix 2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Appendix 3
Master User Fee Schedule
FY 2022-23

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit A: Community Development - City Planning Division Service FY 2022-23
Fee Comments
Administrative Approval: Non-Downtown $5,023.58
Administrative Approval: Non-Downtown Housing Project $9,939.64 Downtown Administrative Approval: Non-residential Projects up to 10,000 sf $5,023.58 Downtown Administrative Approval: Housing Project up to 75,000 sf $9,939.64 Alcohol Exemption $828.89
Appeal - Planning Permit and Noise Variance $612.37
Architectural Review Board - Building Color/Materials: New Construction $10,721.82 Architectural Review Board - Bldg. Color/Materials: Alt/Mod's and SUD on Sloped Parcel $5,041.44 Architectural Review Board - Signs/Landscaping $2,658.12 Architectural Review Board - Sign Adjustment $2,257.93
Architectural Review Board Staff Approval - All Others $967.68 Architectural Review Board (Staff approval - Single Trade excluding signs & windows) Waived Certificate of Appropriateness - Staff Approval Waived
Certificate of Appropriateness - Landmarks Commission Waived Certificate of Administrative Approval Waived
Certificate of Compliance $2,674.07
Certificate of Economic Hardship $12,065.55
Coastal Zone Approval In Concept $161.28
Conditional Use Permit - All Others $16,026.40
Conditional Use Permit - Alcohol $8,052.02
Deed Restriction $1,781.25
Demolition Permits11 $1,385.79 plus actual historic consultant costs if application for designation as a
Landmark or Structure of Merit is filed
Development Agreement (per hour-charged against an initial deposit of $50,000) $254.48 Development Review $27,395.18
Fence, Wall Hedge Height mod. (Discretionary) $2,789.52 Fence, Wall, Hedge Height mod. (Administrative) $971.45 Final Map $1,221.54
General Plan Amendment $31,963.41
Historic District Designation11 $2,130.67 plus actual historic consultant costs Landmark Designation11 $1,126.80 plus actual historic consultant costs Planning Lot Line Adjustment $2,674.07
Major Modification $6,457.92
Minor Modification $1,690.44
Minor Use Permit $4,933.92
Multiple Applications 100% Initial, 50%
thereafter
Occupancy Permit $1,796.57
Permit Extension - Administrative $322.56
Presubmittals $1,720.32
SB330 Preliminary Application $317.60
Shared Parking Permit $2,472.97
Structure of Merit11 $1,062.41 plus actual historic consultant costs Temporary Use Permit - All Others $1,022.01
Temporary Use Permit - Sales $438.22
Temporary Use Permit - Repeat Event $438.22
Tentative Map $5,238.62
Text Amendment Zone Change $31,963.41
Variance Application (including noise) $18,325.90
Waiver of Parcel Map $3,019.50
Waiver - Zoning Ordinance $6,331.69
Zoning Conf Review: Alcohol Determination $503.25
Outdoor Dining - With no Barriers $430.08
Outdoor Dining - With Barriers $430.08
Zoning Conf Review: Zoning Compliance Letter $1,290.24
6409 Review - Telecom $1,096.56
General Plan Surcharge 7.3% of Permit
Business License Planning Review $97.29
Business License Planning Review: Home Occupation $48.64 Environmental Exemptions - Class 32 $18,524.64
Environmental Exemptions - TPP/Class 31 $4,116.58
Mitigated Negative Declaration - Negative Declaration $69,729.71 Environmental Noticing $3,516.95
Environmental Impact Report Review (per hour, deposit of 37% of consultant contract) $356.92 Traffic Study - Without Model Run $35,539.43
Traffic Study - With Model Run $71,078.86
Mailing Label $153.61
Planning Plan Check, per plan (3 reviews) $1,056.42
City Planning Division A - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit A: Community Development - City Planning Division Service FY 2022-23
Fee Comments
Planning Plan Check, per hour (after three reviews) $215.04 Planning Plan Check, per hour - plan revisions, restamping plans, and permit renewals $215.04 Planning Plan Check, per hour, plan checks not otherwise classified $215.04 Planning Plan Check, over the counter $107.52
Travel Demand Forecasting Model (TDFM) 2.5% of Permit
Local Coastal Program Surcharge 0.65% of Permit in
the Coastal Zone
Mills Act Contract Waived
NOTES

1. Planning fees are waived for Large Family Daycare and Child Care Center.

2. Affordable Housing Projects as defined by Zoning Ordinances are exempt.

10. Permit fees related to Downtown Santa Monica, Inc's (DTSM) delivery of contracted services are waived per Council approval dated July 12, 2016.

11. If an application to designate a property, that is 40 years of age or older, as a Landmark or Structure of Merit is filed, while a demolition permit application is pending, the applicant for the Demolition Permit shall bear the actual costs of any historic consultant and the applicable Landmark Designation or Structure of Merit processing fee.

3. In the case of projects requiring multiple permit applications that may be approved by the same entity, the fee for the highest permit shall be charged, plus a multiple permit application for any additional concurrently processed applications. If multiple permits are required which cannot be approved by the same entity, or if an environmental review is required, the full fee for such applications shall be charged.

4. Non-administrative permit extensions shall be charged 50% of the full application fee for the permit to be extended.

5. Applications for ARB review of buildings, which include proposed signage and/or landscaping, shall be charged for the building review fee only. Should a sign adjustment be required, a multiple application fee shall be charged in addition to the building review fee; separate applications for signage and/or landscaping shall be charged the sign/landscaping review fee.

6. A re-submittal for ARB approval of a design change shall be processed with no fee charged unless a building permit has been issued for the project, in which case the standard fee amounts shall be charged. A re-submittal, which includes signage changes that would trigger a requirement for a sign adjustment, shall be charged the sign adjustment fee.

7. Application fee refunds for withdrawn projects shall be processed as follows:
application not yet deemed complete - 90% refund
application deemed complete -75% refund
determination or Planning Commission or other board report drafted - 50% refund; determination issued, ZA hearing conducted, Planning Commission or other board report issued - 25% refund.

8. All planning fees for Administrative Approval applications shall be waived for designated landmark structures and structures identified as contributing to designated historic districts until and unless revised by subsequent ordinance of the City Council.

9. All Certificate of Appropriateness fees for any alteration, restoration, or construction, in whole or in part, to a designated landmark or to structures identified as contributing to a designated historic district shall be waived.

City Planning Division A - 2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit B - Community Development - Building and Safety Service FY 2022-23
Base Fee
FY 2022-23
Unit
FY 2022-23
Additional Fee

ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Presubmittal Review
First Two Hours $ 650.89
Over The Counter / Same-Day Review PC
Standard-up to two reviews $ 626.78
Formal Plan Review: New Buildings and Accessory Structures One and Two Family Dwellings - main & accessory buildings $ 670.15 $ 1.4889 Apartments, Condominiums and Hotels (and attached parking) $ 768.09 $ 1.4657 Commercial/Industrial- complete building (and attached parking) 1st 10,000 square feet $ 760.87 $ 1.9136
Additional 10,000 square feet $ 0.5331
Commercial/Industrial- shell only (including freestanding garage structures) 1st 10,000 square feet $ 666.02 $ 1.0749
Additional 10,000 square feet $ 0.4845
Any projects of 4 stories or more additional 5%
Formal Plan Review: Additions and Alterations
Residential Remodel and Additions- main & accessory bldgs $ 730.97 $ 1.9612 Commercial Tenant Improvements
0 - 10,000 square feet $ 661.90 $ 0.7119
Additional 10,000 square feet $ 0.6299
Interior Demolition
0 - 10,000 square feet $ 470.13 $ 0.0842
Additional 10,000 square feet $ 695.68 $ 0.0669

MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW
Presubmittal Review $ 337.65
Over The Counter / Same-Day Review PC
Standard-up to two reviews $ 337.65
Formal Plan Review
Standard-up to three reviews $ 873.31

ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
Presubmittal Review $ 463.79
Over The Counter / Same-Day Review PC
Standard-up to two reviews $ 463.79
Formal Plan Review
Standard-up to three reviews $ 1,125.59

PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
Presubmittal Review $ 337.65
Over The Counter / Same-Day Review PC
Standard-up to two reviews $ 337.65
Formal Plan Review
Standard-up to three reviews $ 873.31

MISCELLANEOUS PLAN REVIEW FEES
Deferred Submittals $ 1,219.20
Demolition $ 249.47
Means and Methods Plan formal review $ 505.93
Construction Management Plan review $ 1,728.00
Planning Application Review - with or without Presubmittal Review $ 316.21 Minimum Plan Review fee $ 1,281.57
Plan Review Not Otherwise Classified
General hourly rate and excessive plan reviews (more than 2 OTC or 3 formal) $ 282.20

COMBINATION BUILDING PERMITS
One and Two Family Dwellings $ 141.24 $ 1.4477
Apartments, Condominiums and Hotels (and attached parking) $ 140.21 $ 1.1762 Commercial/Industrial - complete building (and attached parking) 1st 10,000 square feet $ 134.03 $ 1.3670
Additional 10,000 square feet $ 96.91 $ 0.6218
Commercial/Industrial- shell only (including freestanding garage structures) 1st 10,000 square feet $ 142.27 $ 0.9106
Additional 10,000 square feet $ 0.6044
Residential Remodel and Additions- main & accessory bldgs $ 201.04 $ 1.9859 Commercial Tenant Improvements
0 - 10,000 square feet $ 172.32 $ 0.5003
Additional 10,000 square feet $ 0.3579
Interior Demolition
0 - 10,000 square feet $ 252.59 $ 0.1270
Additional 10,000 square feet $ 0.0506
Any project of 4 stories or more additional 5%

SINGLE TRADE PERMITS
Residential - 3 inspections max $ 383.42
Additional Inspections- each $ 126.61
All others (Commercial, Demolition, etc)- 3 inspections max $ 383.42 Additional Inspections- each $ 126.61

AFTER HOURS PERMITS
Review of Application $ 462.34
Inspections- per hour (2 hour minimum) $ 281.40
Building and Safety B - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit B - Community Development - Building and Safety Service FY 2022-23
Base Fee
FY 2022-23
Unit
FY 2022-23
Additional Fee

MISCELLANEOUS INSPECTIONS
Inspections Not Otherwise Classified - each hour or fraction thereof $ 281.40 Reinspection Fee:

Combination Building Permit $ 256.30
Single Trade Permit- Residential $ 157.80
Single Trade Permit- All Others $ 157.80
Minimum Inspection Fee - all permits except Single Trade $ 453.25

MISCELLANEOUS FEES
Address Assignment Fee $ 419.81
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy $ 465.59
Change of Record on a Permit:

Single Trade Permit (Residential only) $ 62.36
All Other Permit Types $ 62.36
Engineering Report Review
Seismic Retrofit Report Review $ 394.84
plus $276.27 per
hour
Seismic Retrofit Plan Review $ 394.84
plus $233.45 per
hour
Seismic Retrofit Plan Review - Consultant** Actual Cost Actual Costs/ Per
Hour
Seismic Retrofit Permit $ 35.37
plus $233.30 per
hour
Seismic Retrofit Peer Review $ 242.43 per hour
Seismic Retrofit Peer Review - Consultant** Actual Cost Actual Costs/ Per
Hour
Alternate Methods of Construction:

Premanufactured Products $ 1,178.07
Field Constructed $ 2,350.73
Geotechnical Reports:

Addendum to Original Soils Report $ 1,137.08
As Built Compaction Reports $ 1,703.79
Fault Trench $ 4,974.12
Building/Shoring Plan Review $ 1,267.55
Commercial/Mixed Use/ Apts (4 stories or more including subterranean garage) $ 3,143.52 Standard Reviews and All Others not listed above $ 2,426.76 Sound Attenuation $ 645.39
Energy Compliance- Title 24, Part 6 C.E.C. $ 640.29
Green Building Code Compliance - Title 24, Part 11 10% of plan check Extension Fees
To Start Construction $ 471.62
To Resume or Complete Construction $ 527.91
To Start Construction- Single Trade Residential $ 251.50 To Resume or Complete Construction- Single Trade Residential $ 251.50 License Fees
Special Inspector License - Qualification Review $ 468.51 Fabricator License - Qualification Review $ 468.51
Miscellaneous Reviews
Building and Safety Appeal $ 2,747.52
Accessibility Hardship Exemption $ 886.03
Review and Approval of Testing Lab $ 1,033.17
Modification of Technical Code:

No Administrative hearing- Staff Approval- each main code issue $ 1,267.17 Administrative hearing- Building Officer- project basis $ 2,261.43 Record Fees
Residential Building Record $ 311.84
Approved Plans and Permits (Bonded Copies) actual cost
Application Processing $ 166.82
Maintenance of Permit and Plan Documents (Tech. Enhancement Fee) 13% of permit Renewal Fees
Expired Plan Review - Formal
Plan Check Extension and Renewal Application Processing Only $ 459.10 Any Others $ 459.10
Permit Renewals
No Inspection 100% of permit
Rough Inspection 50% of pmt
Final Inspection 20% of permit
Replacement Card
Replacement I Single Trade $ 62.36
Replacement I All Others $ 62.36
Mobile Home Parks $ 260.37
Investigation Fee For Work Without a Permit Actual Cost

REFUNDS
Issuance Fees no refunds
Building and Safety B - 2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit B - Community Development - Building and Safety Service FY 2022-23
Base Fee
FY 2022-23
Unit
FY 2022-23
Additional Fee
Plan Review
Presubmittal Review no refunds
OTC / Same-Day Review no refunds
Formal Plan Review
First review not started 80% of fees
First review started and up to completion of first round of review 50% of fees Second review started and up to completion of second round of review no refunds Engineering Reports
First review not started 80% of fees
First review started and up to completion of first round of review 50% of fees Second review started and up to completion of second round of review no refunds Inspection Fees
Construction work not yet started 80% of fees
Construction work started - Based on percentage of incomplete construction % of fees Solar Energy System Review Fees
Residential
Photovoltaic (solar energy system) 15kW or less* $ 450.00 Photovoltaic (solar energy system) more than 15kW (plus $15 per kw above 15kW)* $ 450.00 Solar Thermal 10kW or less* $ 450.00
Solar Thermal more than 10kW (plus $15 per kw above 10kW)* $ 450.00 Commercial
Photovoltaic (solar energy system) 50kW or less* $ 1,000.00 Photovoltaic (solar energy system) more than 50kW and up to 250kW (plus $7 per kw above 50kW)* $ 1,000.00 Photovoltaic (solar energy system) more than 250kW (plus $5 per kw above 250kW)* $ 2,400.00 Solar Thermal 30kW or less* $ 1,000.00
Solar Thermal more than 30kW and up to 260kW (plus $7 per kw above 30kW)* $ 1,000.00 Solar Thermal more than 260kW (plus $5 per kw above 260kW)* $ 2,610.00 Subsidies
Single Trade Permits - Residential Only
Total fees shall be reduced 50% to encourage citizens to obtain permits for simple work that benefits from safety inspections 50% of fees

WAIVERS
A. Inspection of Small or Large Family Day Care for State Social Services Licenses.

NOTES

1. Total fees for each separate payment transaction may be rounded to the nearest full dollar. *Fees are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase; the amounts are established by state law.

2. Permit fees related to Downtown Santa Monica, Inc's (DTSM) delivery of contracted services are waived per Council approval dated July 12, 2016. **Seismic Retrofit Plan Check and Seismic Retrofit Peer Review Fees for consulting services will apply for non-soft story projects and or other projects based upon objective criteria on file with the Building and Safety Division.

No fees are charged for Building and Safety services on the following uses except for plan reviews exceeding three rounds of review, reinspections, extensions, and renewals.

B. Voluntary installation (i.e. not required by code) of electric vehicle charging equipment, solar photovoltaic systems, solar thermal heating systems, solar pool heating equipment, grey water systems, and any associated electrical service or panel upgrades dedicated to only serve the qualifying equipment.

Building and Safety B - 3

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit C: Department of Transportation - Mobility
Service FY 2022-23
Fee
Unit
Traffic Studies-each hour or fraction
Traffic/Parking Hourly Rate $ 241.12 per hour
Traffic Study Review-Non CEQA $ 264.14 per hour
Traffic Control Plan Review- Base Fee
First two reviews, per page $ 330.03
Third and subsequent reviews, per page $ 349.12
Over the Counter Plan Check:

Standard (2 reviews maximum) $ 369.43
Each additional review (after 2) $ 235.82
Standard Plan Check - Parking/Loading and Access:
0-2 Parking Spaces: < 7,500 sq ft $ 593.67
0-2 Parking Spaces: ≥ 7,500 sq ft $ 1,658.36
3-20 Parking Spaces $ 1,350.38
21-40 Parking Spaces $ 1,641.89
41-100 Parking Spaces $ 1,986.10
Each additional 100 Parking Spaces $ 1,333.95
Miscellaneous-each hour/fraction thereof:

Plan Checks - Not Otherwise Classified $ 247.02 per hour Plan Revisions $ 240.43 per hour
Permit Renewals $ 247.02 per hour
Excess Plan Checks - 3rd+ resubmittal $ 247.02 per hour Employee Annual Transportation Fee:

Employers with 10-49 employees filing a Workplace Transportation Plan1 $ 19.41 per employee Employers with 50+ employees filing either an Employee Trip Reduction Plan or Mobile Source Emissions Reduction Credit Plan $ 17.90 per employee Administrative Costs-each hour/fraction thereof:

Senior Transportation Planner $ 279.96 per hour
Transportation Planning Associate $ 236.57 per hour
Transportation Planning Assistant $ 214.08 per hour
Transportation Management Coordinator $ 257.55 per hour Transportation Engineer $ 297.76 per hour
Site Inspections - verify existing conditions - each $ 240.43 per hour Pre-Submittal Review $ 601.07
Temporary No Parking Sign Issuance $ 77.07 Per Issuance Temporary No Parking (each parking sign) $ 1.76 per sign House Moving $ 2,236.15
Oversized Load - One Way* $ 16.00
Oversized Load - Two Way* $ 32.00
Valet Permit - Annual $ 2,631.79
Valet Permit - Renewal $ 1,450.34
Valet Permit - One Day $ 792.10
Bike Racks $ 353.66
Block Parties $ 67.68
Permit - Auto Park $ 298.30
Sign Removal $ 214.39 per sign
Event Permit: Traffic Engineer $ 353.47 per hour
Mobility C - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit C: Department of Transportation - Mobility
Service FY 2022-23
Fee
Unit
Developer Initial TDM Fee - Simple $ 488.85
Developer Initial TDM Fee - Complex $ 2,349.23
Developer Annual TDM Fee - Simple $ 353.82
Developer Annual TDM Fee - Complex $ 868.92
Roadway Closure Permit $ 319.58
Temporary Traffic Control Permit - Urgency Action (TTCP-UA)2 $ 431.76 Shared Mobility Device Public Right of Way Use Fee (per device) $ 0.20 per trip Shared Mobility Device Pilot Program - Operator Fee $ 21,486.04 annually Shared Mobility Device Pilot Program - Per Device Fee $ 108.25 annually License Agreements, Covenants, Deed restrictions $ 839.90 Notes
* Fees not subject to the City's annual administrative revision and increase.

1. The fee descriptions for the Employee Annual Transportation Fees have been updated to reflect Section

9.53.050 of the Municipal Code (added per Ordinance No. 2486 (CCS) adopted June 23, 2015). Reductions may be applicable pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code sections 9.53.050(A)(5) & (6).

2. Available only when necessary to accomplish goals concerning the urgent fulfillment of health and safety concerns within the public right-of-way. Applicability determined based on objective criteria on file with the City’s Civil Engineering Division.

Mobility C - 2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit D: Community Development - Code Enforcement
Service FY 2022-23
Fees
Noise Ordinance- After Hours Permit $ 1,052.97
Residential Bldg Rept - Code Compl Review $ 320.75
Nonautomotive Impound Fee (per item) $ 102.05
Home-Sharing Permit - Initial fee $ 298.28
Home-Sharing Permit - Annual renewal fee $ 156.62
Medicinal Cannabis Light Manufacturer* $ 122.44
Medicinal Cannabis Retailer- New: July - September (4 inspections)* $ 1,845.12 Medicinal Cannabis Retailer- New: October - December (3 inspections)* $ 1,410.90 Medicinal Cannabis Retailer- New: January - March (2 inspections)* $ 976.67 Medicinal Cannabis Retailer- New: April - June (1 inspection)* $ 542.45 Medicinal Cannabis Retailer - Renewal* $ 1,845.12
Sidewalk Vendor Permit $ 72.68
Vehicle Vendor Permit $ 72.68
NOTES
*Fees not subject to the City's annual administrative revision and increase.

Permit fees related to Downtown Santa Monica, Inc's (DTSM) delivery of contracted services are waived per Council approval dated July 12, 2016.

Code Enforcement D - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit E1 -Public Works: Civil Engineering
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit
Newsrack Permit: Annual Renewal $ 137.50 per unit
Newsrack Permit: New Install $ 323.06 per unit
Newsrack Permit: Impound Fee $ 520.45
Use of Public Property: New Permit with
Transportation Review
$ 365.33
Use of Public Property: New Permit without
Transportation Review
$ 221.38
Use of Public Property: Permit Renewal without
Transportation Review
$ 167.09
Use of Public Property: Permit for Moving Pods $ 161.97 Crane Permit $ 323.06 per day
Use of Public Property Commercial $ 2.62 per day, per 100 sq ft Use of Public Property Residential $ 1.61 per day, per 100 sq ft Street Improvement Inspections: SFR Apron,
Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, or Alley
$ 628.10
Street Improvement Inspections: non-SFR
Apron, Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, or Alley
$ 831.46
Outdoor Dining Inspection $ 252.66
Utility Excavation Permit: up to 100 feet $ 1,313.81
Utility Excavation Permit: 100 feet & over $ 241.58 per hour Permit Renewal $ 167.09
Wireless Telecommunications Construction
Permit: No excavation or up to 100 Feet
$ 1,265.81 per location
Wireless Telecommunications Construction
Permit: Over 100 feet of excavation
$ 221.38 per hour, per location
Wireless Facility Permit/6409(a) Permit
Application
$ 1,342.87 per location
Blanket Utility Permit: Public Property Use up to
320 sq ft
$ 275.74
Blanket Utility Permit: Minor Excavation up to 100
linear ft
$ 275.74
Certificate of Compliance $ 2,122.17
Tentative Map $ 985.10
Final Map $ 2,782.86
Lot Line Adjustment $ 1,478.65
Final Map Revision $ 1,070.84
Tentative Map Revision $ 383.74
Industrial Waste Discharge $ 707.12
Site Drainage - Changing Existing Pattern $ 489.94
Civil Engineering E1 - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit E1 -Public Works: Civil Engineering
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit
Urban Runoff Mitigation Plan $ 707.12
Tiebacks $ 1,351.20
Miscellaneous Reviews: Flood Hazard Letter $ 234.62
Plan Check Review Fee - Building Permits
(rounded to the nearest 1/2 hour increment)
$ 253.64 per hour
Review of Legal Easements/License
Agreements
$ 1,640.34
Right of Way Research / Inquiries - each hour $ 216.95 per hour Wireless Related Permits - Outside Consultants Actual Cost Development Agreement Feasibility and
Concept Review Fee
$ 377.80 per hour
(rounded to the
nearest 1/2 hour
increment)
Underground Utility Waiver Application and
Letter of Determination
$ 297.48
Annual Lease Fee – Small Wireless Facility $ 842.16
Plan Check Review Fee - Including Flood Plan
Review ,Off-Site Permit and Vacation of Public
Right-of-Way
$ 309.40 per hour
Civil Engineering E1 - 2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit E2 - Public Works: Street Services
Service FY 2022-23
Fee
Unit
Sidewalk Removal, Hauling, Replacement (up to 4"
thick) $ 100.24
per sf
Driveway Removal, Hauling, Replacement (depth to
6") $ 120.48
per sf
Removal, Hauling, Replacement: Curb Only
$ 612.20 per lf
Removal, Hauling, Replacement: Curb & Gutter $ 829.11 per lf Removal, Hauling, Replacement: Gutter Only $ 587.96 per lf Removal, Hauling, Replacement: Concrete Alleys (up
to 6") $ 53.58
per sf
Asphalt Removal, Hauling, Replacement (up to 4")
$ 36.48
per sf
Asphalt Removal, Hauling, Replacement (over 4")
$ 37.26
per sf
Parkway Removal & Hauling: per square foot $ 38.71 per sf Removal & Hauling of Abandoned Driveway $ 70.75 per sf
Asphalt Cement Overlay (1/2" to 1-1/2" thick) $ 16.02 per sf Asphalt Cement Overlay (1-1/2" - 4" thick) $ 16.46 per sf Miscellaneous Saw Cuts: per linear foot $ 12.72 per lf
Tie-Ins Into Existing Asphalt or Concrete: per linear
foot $ 106.62 per lf
Conduit Only Repair OR Relocation: per linear foot
$ 9.68 per lf
Pull Box & Conduit Relocation: per linear foot $ 16.74 per lf Street Services E2-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit E3 - Public Works: Resource Recovery and Recycling Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit
Additional Pick-Up Service: Bin $ 91.36
Additional Pick-Up Service: Cart $ 66.51
Container Rental (Rent-A-Bin per each four week period. Includes Bin Rental, Delivery, and One Pick-Up & Disposal)
$ 309.67
Curby Rental per hour (2 hour minimum/4 hour maximum) $ 213.51 per hour Event Rental / Party Truck per hour (Hourly, 2 hour minimum/4 hour maximum)
$ 174.43 per hour
Kitchen Food Scrap Pail Sales $ 6.70 plus pail
Pressure Washing Services (per Hour) (Minimum of 1 hour) $ 193.34 Private Refuse Hauler Permit $ 543.24
Sale of Composting Bins (Santa Monica Residents Only) (50% Subsidy, Limit Two per Household)
$ 38.47 plus bin
Solid Waste Encl Plan Check: Complex (Major) $ 627.27
Solid Waste Encl Plan Check: Simple (SFR) $ 78.78
Solid Waste Encl Plan Check: Medium $ 525.27
Solid Waste Handling Fee (per ton) $ 22.42
Street Sweeping Services $ 262.29
Cart Rollout Services $ 20.44
Bin Washing Services $ 64.02
Extra Refuse Bag Sales (cost of bags not included) $ 26.82 Plus pack of 5 bags
Bulky Item Collection (Hourly, one-hour minimum) $ 225.68 per hour Event Coordination Fee (Bins or Carts) $ 284.41
Constr & Demo Waste Management Plan Review: Complex $ 817.38 Constr & Demo Waste Management Plan Review: Medium $ 625.47 Constr & Demo Waste Management Plan Review: Simple (SFR) $ 527.70 Truck Ad Space Rental (per panel, per side, per month) $ 252.70 Roll out Services - Crew Pullout $ 124.27
Roll out Services - Bin Truck Pullout $ 143.46
Event Cart Rental (Refuse, Food Waste, or Recycling - Per Cart) $ 150.87 per cart Event Bin Rental (Refuse, Food Waste, or Recycling - Per Bin) $ 290.28 per bin Construction & Demo Project Waste Management Plan Review: Demo Only
$ 625.47
Resource Recovery and Recycling E3-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit E4 - Public Works: Water Resources
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit
Water Service Install: 3/4" to 1" Partial Upgrade $ 843.84 plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Water Service Install: 3/4" Meter $ 6,946.57 plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Water Service Install: 1" Meter $ 7,033.64 plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Water Service Install: 1-1/2" Meter $ 7,816.14 plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Water Service Install: 2" Meter $ 8,048.12 plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Water Service Install: 3" Meter $ 16,348.28 plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Water Service Install: 4" Meter $ 17,270.00 plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Water Service Install: 6" Meter $ 18,089.64 plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Water Service Install: 8" Meter $ 27,196.92 plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Water Service Install: 10"+ Meter Actual plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Fire Svc Install: 2" $ 7,578.50 plus Water Capital
Facility Fee1
Fire Svc Install: 3" $ 12,269.67 plus Water Capital
Facility Fee1
Fire Svc Install: 4" - 10" $ 18,760.89 plus Water Capital Facility Fee1
Damaged Water Meter Repair Actual Cost
Water Meter Downsize Actual Cost
Water Resources E4-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit E4 - Public Works: Water Resources
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit
Water Inspection Not Identified Elsewhere $ 270.20
Temp Water Service $ 273.20
Moved Meter $ 169.98
Water Meter Test: 3/4" - 2" Meter $ 326.87
Water Meter Test: 3" and Over $ 980.63
Delinquent Water Bills Tags $ 68.80
Storm Drain Connect of Existing Box $ 501.62
Storm Drain Pipe Installation/Connection $ 501.62 per install Storm Drain Saddle Installation $ 1,055.76
Storm Dye Test $ 255.70
Emergency Sewage Spill Response Actual Cost
Sewer Reinspection $ 277.64
Same Day Emergency Turn-Off (regular hours) $ 159.87
Same Day Emer Turn-Off (after hours, holidays) $ 297.49 Industr Waste Discharge Variance Request $ 108.70
Industr WW Permit: Class 1 $ 288.65
Industr WW Permit: Class 2 $ 955.70
Industr WW Permit: Class 3 $ 1,463.45
Industr WW Permit: Class 4 $ 1,989.25
Industr WW Permit: Class 5 $ 2,750.27
Industr WW Permit: Class 6 $ 5,209.65
Industr WW Permit: Class 99 $ 154.17
Industr WW Permit: New Application Fee $ 111.78
Fire Hydrant Relocation - new tap & killout $ 16,289.14 Fire Hydrant Installation $ 17,869.46
Fire Hydrant Flow Test $ 959.15
Reestablish Delinquent Account $ 68.80
Sewer Saddle Connection $ 1,055.76
Sewer Cap: At Time of Saddle Install $ 549.67 plus materials Sewer Cap: After Saddle Install $ 677.52 plus materials Sewer Lateral Inspection $ 586.75
Manifold Service (3 or more, 3/4" to 1" install) $ 5,074.19 Sewer Study Review $ 4,581.16
Water Study Review $ 3,435.87
1 The Water Capital Facility fee is an existing system capacity fee as authorized by Municipal Code Section 7.12.090.

Water Resources E4-2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit F - Public Works: Public Landscape
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit Deposit
Park Maintenance Service $ 117.16 per hour
Park Asset Damage Actual Cost
Park Event Clean Up Deposit (150-500 people) $ 500.00
Park Event Clean Up Deposit (501-1000 people) $ 1,000.00 Park Event Clean Up Deposit (1000+ people) $ 1,500.00
Beach Maintenance Service $ 129.82 per hour
Beach Asset Damage Actual Cost
Beach Event Clean Up Deposit (150-500 people) $ 500.00
Beach Event Clean Up Deposit (501-1000 people) $ 1,000.00 Beach Event Clean Up Deposit (1000+ people) $ 1,500.00
Tree Planting 24" Box $ 299.81
Tree Planting 36" Box $ 817.73
Tree Planting 48" Box $ 2,071.53
Tree & Stump Removal 0-24 DSH Per Inch $ 32.68
Tree & Stump Removal >24 DSH Per Inch $ 43.61
Full Prune 7-12 DSH $ 163.51
Full Prune 13-18 DSH $ 245.27
Full Prune 19-24 DSH $ 299.81
Full Prune 25-30 DSH $ 408.79
Full Prune 31-36 DSH $ 490.60
Full Prune >36 DSH $ 545.14
Tree Restitution - Cost Per Required Replacement 24" Box Tree $ 726.19

PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION FEES
Presubmittal Review $ 231.78
Standard Plan Review $ 463.57
Permit Revisions $ 115.89
Permit Renewals $ 115.89
More Than Three Plan Reviews $ 154.52 per hour
Construction Inspection $0 - $300k $ 231.78
Construction Inspection $300k - $1M $ 463.57
Construction Inspection $1M - $20M $ 1,390.72
Construction Inspection $20M - up $ 1,854.29
Public Landscape F - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit G - Public Works: Film Permits
Service FY 2022-23
Application Fee
FY 2022-23
Location Fee
Security
Depost
Film Permit: Airport – public airside/landside still
photography, 1-20 cast/crew
$ 737.78 $ 129.81
Film Permit: Airport – leasehold property, still
photography/motion
$ 737.78
Film Permit: Airport - complex/large productions, 21+
cast/crew
$ 763.08 $ 1,994.03
Beaches - Film/Video $ 529.77 $ 1,363.92
Beaches - Still Photography $ 407.21 $ 136.38
City Hall - Film/Video $ 404.92 $ 1,994.03
City Hall - Still Photography $ 309.68 $ 1,329.36
Downtown Santa Monica - Still photography $ 322.52 $ 332.33 Downtown Santa Monica - Film/video interior, man on
street/walk and talk
$ 460.40
Downtown Santa Monica - Film/video, half day shoot
including interior/exterior
$ 460.40 $ 1,329.36
Downtown Santa Monica - Film/video, all day, multiple
locations
$ 485.70 $ 3,323.39
Parks - Film/Video $ 502.94 $ 1,329.36
Parks - Still Photography $ 406.89
Pier/Carousel - Film/video/street interview $ 304.74 $ 3,323.39 $ 5,000.00 Pier/Carousel - Film/video, half day (6 hrs.) $ 279.44 $ 1,329.36 $ 2,000.00 Pier/Carousel - Street interviews $ 254.13 $ 1,063.47 $ 500.00 Pier/Carousel - Equipment only $ - $ 1,329.36 $ 500.00
Pier/Carousel - Still photography, low impact, interior only
$ 201.47 $ 664.67 $ 100.00
Pier/Carousel - Still photography, exterior $ 201.47 $ 1,994.03 $ 500.00 Student/Non-Profit - Film/Video $ 184.64
Student/Non-Profit - Still Photography $ 184.64
All Other Locations - Film/Video $ 337.62 $ 681.95
All Other Locations - Still Photography $ 184.64 $ 272.77 Rider Fee-Addition, change or deletion to the permit $ 156.70 $ 132.92 Film Permits G-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit H1 - Police
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit
Permit-Entertainment in Bar, Nightclub,
Restaurant $ 50.70
Permit-Fire Arm Sales $ 50.70
Permit-Tow Truck Operator $ 50.70
Permit - all others required by code not listed $ 50.70 Local Records Check $ 27.36
Firearms Storage and Release $ 46.03
Massage Technician Permit - New $ 117.65
Massage Technician Permit - Renewal $ 78.57
Massage Establishment Permit $ 290.09
Second Hand Dealer Permit - New $ 409.20
Second Hand Dealer Permit- Renewal $ 386.79
Pawnbroker Permit- New $ 409.20
Pawnbroker Permit - Renewal $ 274.76
Alarm Registration Fee $ 12.46
Police Report - Correct DR#, electronic copy No fee if correct DR number is provided.

Data Compilation Fee for Police Reports
(unknown DR#) and other SMPD records -
electronic copy Actual Cost
Police Report - hard copy1 $ 0.20 per page
Digital Image Extraction or Compilation Actual Cost
Audio Extraction or Compilation Actual Cost
Video Extraction or Compilation Actual Cost
Data Compilation (per hour) $ 124.98
Vehicle impound & release $ 159.90
30 day vehicle impound $ 1,128.99
Police Billable Services (per hour) Actual Cost
Equipment fees for special events and film permitspolice horse $ 32.44 per day Equipment fees for special events and film permitsPD Vehicle $ 97.35 per day Equipment fees for special events and film permitsmotor $ 64.90 per day Equipment fees for special events and film permitscommand post $ 97.35 per day Equipment fees for special events and film permitsrescue boat (4 hour minimum charge) $ 259.63
$32.42 for each
additional hour
Parking Citation Dismissal - Disabled Placard1 $ 25.00
Parking Citation Dismissal - Preferential R Permit2
$ 36.80
Notes
1 Fee not subject to the City's annual administrative revision and increase. 2 Unless Vehicle Code section 40226 applies.

Fees are per occurrence unless otherwise noted.

Police H1-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit H2 - Police (Animal Control)
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit
Adoptions - basic fee, dog/puppy/cat/kitten $ 70.50
Adoptions - vaccine $ 31.70
Adoptions - spay/neuter surgery $ 109.93
Adoptions - basic fee, rabbit $ 31.23
Adoptions - basic fee, small animal $ 31.23 per hour
Adoptions - basic fee, large animal $ 70.52
Adoptions - home again microchip $ 30.71
Adoptions - rabies vaccinations $ 21.27
Annual dog license - spayed/neutered1 $ 26.77
Annual dog license - unspayed/unneutered2 $ 53.54
Annual dog license - duplicate (replacement) $ 53.54
Non resident permit tag - airport park $ 28.82
Conditional Animal Permit $ 139.88
Beehive Permit $ 139.88
Impound - dog $ 75.73
Impound - cat $ 29.12
Dead Animal Pickup $ 123.36
Dead Animal Disposal $ 37.81
Owner surrender - dog licensed $ 70.52
Owner surrender - dog unlicensed/altered $ 90.38
Owner surrender - dog unlicensed/unaltered $ 139.98
Owner surrender - cat $ 70.52
Boarding - dog, cat, other $ 24.67
Trap rental - 10 days $ 27.77
Plus $50.00
deposit
Notes
1 Late Charge of $5.00 will be applied per SMMC 4.04.170. 2 Late charge of $10.00 will be applied per SMMC 4.04.170 Fees are per occurrence unless otherwise noted.

Police H2-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit I - Fire*
Service FY 2022-23
Fee
FY 2022-23
Additional Fee Unit
Standard/Complex Plan Check-new building: 1st 2,500 sf $ 694.20 Standard/Complex Plan Check new building: >2,500 sf (per sf) $ 694.20 $ 0.0694 per sq ft Commercial Tenant Improvement: 1st 2,500 sf $ 347.10
Commercial Tenant Improvement: > 2,500 sf (per sf) $ 347.10 $ 0.0347 per sq ft Miscellaneous plan review $ 347.10
Solar panel plan review $ 347.10
Fire Sprinkler - NFPA 13/13R Sys: 1-10 Heads $ 443.87
Fire Sprinkler - NFPA 13/13R Sys: 10+ Heads $ 443.87 $ 4.56 cost per head Fire Sprinkler - NFPA 13D Sys: up to 10k sq ft $ 443.87 Fire Sprinkler - NFPA 13D Sys: >10k sq ft $ 580.66
Fire Sprinkler- NFPA 13D:TI $ 307.09
Fire Sprinklers: special high pile and sprinkler system combined Actual Cost $ 1,000 deposit required Private hydrant systems Actual Cost
Fire pump installation $ 1,743.35
Fire Alarms, new system, 1st 24 Devices $ 991.02
Fire Alarms, new system, each additional device over 24 devices $ 13.68 Fire alarms, TI's, 1st 24 devices $ 649.05
Fire alarms, TI's, each additional device over 24 devices $ 13.68 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Alarm System $ 443.87
Fire Alarms, Fire Panel Replacement $ 307.09
Special Fire Extinguisher Systems - clean agent $ 922.63 Special Fire Extinguisher Systems - (eg kitchen hoods) $ 649.05 Medical Lab: Gas systems (type 1) $ 727.71
Medical Lab: Gas systems (type 2 & 3) $ 1,769.02
Storage tank above ground - install $ 842.89
Storage tank above ground - removal $ 351.90
Storage tank above ground - modify $ 211.14
AST Install: generator belly tank $ 315.04
Storage tank underground install - base fee $ 1,862.43
Storage tank underground install-each additional tank $ 425.33 Storage tank underground install - each additional plan check or inspection $ 170.13
Storage tank underground removal - base fee $ 1,649.76
Storage tank underground removal - each additional tank $ 340.26 Storage tank underground removal - each additional plan check or inspection $ 170.13
Storage tank underground modify - simple $ 255.20
Storage tank underground modify - complex $ 935.72
Emergency responder radio system $ 2,502.02
Emergency responder radio rental $ 100.00
Battery systems $ 1,103.29
Gas detection system $ 1,041.30
Annual Permit - aircraft refueling facility $ 340.26
Annual Permit - aircraft repair hangar $ 369.97
Annual Permit - ambulatory surgical center I-2.1
$ 556.49
Annual Permit - approved production facilities $ 325.65 Annual Permit - candles open flame annual $ 38.47
Annual Permit - carnivals or fairs $ 144.93
Annual Permit - Christmas tree lots $ 309.33
Annual Permit - combustible dust products $ 176.71
Annual Permit - combustible fibers $ 176.71
Annual Permit - combustible materials $ 176.71
Convalescent hospital, assistive living and social rehabilitation $ 614.20
Adult & Child Daycare under 50 occupants
$ 325.65
Adult & Child Daycare 50 or more occupants
$ 441.07
Annual Permit - explosives $ 278.69
Annual Permit - high piled combustible storage $ 210.23 Fire I -1
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 1.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit I - Fire
Service FY 2022-23
Fee
FY 2022-23
Additional Fee Unit
Annual Permit - hospital I-2 $ 1,100.19
Annual Permit - hot work open flame $ 176.71
Annual Permit - industrial ovens $ 176.71
Annual Permit - laboratory $ 176.71
Annual Permit - LPG-annual $ 176.71
Annual Permit: Large Family Day Care $ 267.94
Public/private school Group E less than 10,000 sq. ft.
$ 441.07 sq. ft
Public/private school Group E 10,000 sq. ft or more $ 787.33 sq. ft Annual Permit - public assembly, <300 occupants $ 356.43 Annual Permit - public assembly, 300+ occupants $ 498.78 Annual Permit - repair garage $ 179.87
Assisted Living and Social Rehabilitation: R-4 $ 441.07 Annual Permit - spraying/dipping $ 210.23
Other inspections - annual not otherwise listed Actual Cost Annual commercial inspections: individual suite or unit, 0-500 sf $ 106.79 Annual commercial inspections: individual suite or unit, 501-2,000 sf $ 162.44 Annual commercial inspections: individual suite or unit, 2,001-5,000 sf $ 220.90 Annual commercial inspections: individual suite or unit, 5,001-10,000 sf $ 279.47 Annual commercial inspections: individual suite or unit, >10,000 sf $ 411.05 Annual commercial inspections - common area: base 1st story (includes single story buildings) $ 71.55
Annual commercial inspections - common area: 0-2,000 sf per floor $ 95.40 Annual commercial inspections - common area: 2,001-5,000 sf per floor $ 131.17
Annual commercial inspections - common area: 5,001-10,000 s.f per floor $ 238.50
Annual commercial inspections - common area: >10,001 sq ft $ 310.05 Annual multi-family residential inspections: 3-15 units $ 164.98 Annual multi-family residential inspections: 16-49 units $ 235.68 Annual multi-family residential inspections: 50-99 units $ 348.52 Annual multi-family residential inspections: 100 units and over $ 474.07 Mixed use - Business & Mercantile $ 206.64
Mixed use - Residential $ 206.64
High rise fire inspections, Commerical, R-1, R-2, R55-75 ft $ 1,562.18
High rise fire inspections,Commerical, R-1, R-2, >75 ft $ 2,075.46 Tents & Canopies 401-2000 sq ft $ 217.39
Tents & Canopies 2,001-5,000 sq ft $ 309.33
Tents & Canopies over 5,000 sq ft $ 0.0596 per sq ft
Candles open flame - special event $ 156.10
LPG special event $ 114.28
Vehicle in building - special event $ 125.45
Studio & theater occupancies - pyrotechnic SFX app sound stage $ 769.04 Studio & theater pyrotechnic SFX - location filming $ 401.28 Special Event Review $ 390.10
Large Special Event Review requiring setup prior to day of event (5 hour minimum) $ 1,861.15
Commercial Umbrella Permit $ 67.57
Other inspections - special events $ 390.10
CUPA - city administrative fee - per CUPA Facility $ 668.71 CRTK hazardous materials inspection - category 1A $ 212.66 CRTK hazardous materials inspection - category 1B
$ 544.06
CRTK hazardous materials inspection - category 2 $ 488.90 CRTK hazardous materials inspection - category 3 $ 615.26 CRTK hazardous materials inspection - category 4 $ 985.33 CUPA - annual CalARP Review: level 1 - per facility $ 1,004.80 CUPA - annual CalARP Review: level 2 - per facility $ 1,674.67 CUPA - annual CalARP Review: level 3 - per facility $ 3,349.37 CUPA - per facility, CalARP Review - add'l rev &insp Actual Cost Fire I -2 *Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 1.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit I - Fire
Service FY 2022-23
Fee
FY 2022-23
Additional Fee Unit
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation-silver waste only 1 $ 295.00
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation, 1-5 Employees 1 $ 590.00
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation, 6-19 Employees 1 $ 828.00
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation, 20-100 Employees 1 $ 1,131.00
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation, 101-500 Employees 1 $ 1,644.00
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation, 501 Employees and over 1 $ 2,815.00
CUPA - county charges (set by and passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation/tiered permit-conditionally exempt 1 $ 139.00 CUPA - county charges (passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation/tiered permit-conditionally authorized 1 $ 916.00 CUPA - county charges (passed through to LA County): hazardous waste generation/tiered permit-permit by rule 1 $ 1,308.00
CUPA - state underground storage tank administrative charges (passed by State): underground storage tank oversight1
State set
charge
CUPA - State Administrative Surcharge (passed by State): all CUPA facilities1 State set charge
CUPA - state underground storage tank administrative charges (set by and passed through to LA County): CalARP, per facility1
State set
charge
CUPA - state underground storage tank administrative charges (set by and passed through to LA County): Electronic Surcharge, per facility1 State set charge
CUPA - state aboveground tank administrative surcharge (passed through CA)1
State set
charge
Aboveground Tank (AST < 10K gallon) $ 340.26
Aboveground Tank (AST > 10K gallon) $ 637.99
Underground Tank Permit (Base & 1st Tank) $ 1,148.39
Underground Tank Permit (ea add'l Tank) $ 255.20
Tank Permit (TIUGA)
$ 46.92
Final building inspection $ 468.21
Final building inspection: R-3 $ 194.64
Miscellaneous - alternate materials, design and methods $ 1,789.32
Miscellaneous - compliance reinspections, resubmittals or retesting $ 267.13 Miscellaneous - special event inspection or special event review $ 401.28 Miscellaneous - additional site inspection per additional floor, suite or area $ 307.09
Miscellaneous - off-hour inspection /expedited plan review, 4 hour minimum (each hour or fraction) $ 568.73
Miscellaneous - uniform fire code permits, others Actual Cost Reinspection Fee $ 347.45
Advanced Life Support Assessment Fee (The difference between the Los Angeles County approved Advanced Life Support rate and the Los Angeles County Basic Life Support rate.)
County Set
Charge
Paramedic ALS Assessment Fee for BLS Transports $ 659.84 Disposable Medical Supplies Fee (The fee is set by LA County) County Set Charge
Code-3 Response Fee-Lights and Siren (The fee is set by LA County) County Set Charge
Administrative Costs: Assistant Fire Marshal (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost per hour Administrative Costs: Senior Fire Inspector (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost per hour Administrative Costs: Senior Fire Inspector-Hazmat (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost per hour
Fire I -3 *Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 1.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit I - Fire
Service FY 2022-23
Fee
FY 2022-23
Additional Fee Unit
Administrative Costs: Fire Inspector (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost per hour Administrative Costs: CUPA Administrator (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost Administrative Costs: Environmental Compliance Specialist (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost per hour
Administrative Costs: Fire Safety Officer Assignment, 4 hour minimum (each hour or fraction) Actual Cost per hour
Fire Safety Officer Assignment vehicle fee $ 68.46
Outdoor Dining Inspection Fee $ 186.49
Special Event Planning Fee (each hour or fraction) $ 367.76 Presubmittal Meetings with Building & Safety $ 183.88
Fire I -4

Notes
1 Fees are not subject to the City's established annual administrative revision and increase. *Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 1.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit J - Records and Election Services
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit
Domestic Partner Filing $ 23.41
Domestic Partner Notice of Revocation $ 13.75
Domestic Partner Amendment $ 13.75
Document Certification $ 21.80
Flash Drive Copy (For PRA) $ 5.15
Passport Execution Fee (plus Federal application fees)1 $ 35.00 Passports Photos1 $ 14.50
Public Records Act Copies1 $ 0.20 per page
Lobbyist Registration1 $ 95.00
Lobbyist Renewal/Amendment/Addendum1 $ 54.00
Election Filing Fee1 $ 25.00
Campaign Disclosure Statements (per page)1 $ 0.10 per page Passport Overnight Delivery Fee Actual Cost
(passthrough
overnight
delivery fee)
Nomination Petitions - Every Additional Set (after the first two sets)1 $ 2.00 Nomination Packet for Non-Candidates or Candidates (after the first set)1 $ 45.00 Notes
1 Fees not subject to the City's annual administrative revision and increase.

Records and Election Services J-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit K: Miscellaneous
Service FY 2022-23
Fee
Returned Check Processing Fee (First NSF)1 $ 25.00
Returned Check Processing Fee (Subsequent NSF)1 $ 35.00 Returned Check Processing Fee (License Fees)1 $ 10.00
Tobacco Retailer License2
Moving Bus Stop $ 710.64
Duplicate Licenses1 $ 10.00
Performance Permit1 $ 37.00
Replacement of a Performance Permit1 $ 37.00
Pkg Citation Payment Plan - Enrollment Fee (Indigent)1 $ 5.00 Pkg Citation Payment Plan - Late Fee (Indigent)1 $ 5.00 Pkg Citation Payment Plan – Enrollment Fee (General Public)1 $ 25.00 Event Permit - Parking Manager $ 589.18
Event Permit - Parking Operations Specialist $ 298.44
Event Permit - Customer Service Supervisor $ 283.84
Hourly Rate: Parking Manager $ 589.18
Hourly Rate: Principal Administrative Analyst $ 421.74
Hourly Rate: Parking Operations Specialist $ 298.44
Hourly Rate: Customer Service Supervisor $ 283.84
Hourly Rate: Parking Permits Assistant $ 212.11
Notes
1 Fees not subject to the City's annual administrative revision and increase. 2 The Tobacco Retailer License fee has been suspended untill June 30, 2023 to lessen the burden on retailers during the pandemic and to review the ongoing costs of the program in light of existing and future grants. The fee will be in force automatically on July 1, 2023.

Miscellaneous K-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit L - Public Works: Office of Sustainability and the Environment Service FY 2022-23
Fee
Urban Run-Off Mitigation Onsite Inspection
- per property, includes 2 inspections
$ 176.27
Urban Run-Off Mitigation Onsite Inspection
- per additional inspection
$ 57.79
Landscape & Irrigation Onsite Inspection (SF/MF) $ 271.62 Landscape & Irrigation Onsite Inspection (Comm/MU/Inst) $ 384.32 Landscape & Irrigation Plan Check (SF/MF) $ 346.76
Landscape & Irrigation Plan Check (Comm/MU/Inst) $ 433.45 EV User Fee $ 0.30
Water Neutrality - performance based direct offset of add'l water - plan check
$ 433.45
Water Neutrality - performance based direct offset of add'l water - inspection
$ 173.38
Water Neutrality - administrative fee - SF/MFU 1-101 $ 1,231.00 Water Neutrality - administrative fee - MFU 11-501 $ 1,756.29 Water Neutrality - administrative fee - Comm/MFU 51+ units1 $ 2,642.40 Water Neutrality - in-lieu offset fee $ 0.19
Community Gardens - Annual Permit (Renewal) - Small(less than 150 Sq. Ft)1 $ 100.00 Community Gardens - Annual Permit (Renewal) - Medium(150-249 Sq. Ft.)1 $ 132.00 Community Gardens - Annual Permit (Renewal) - Large 250 Sq Ft. and Larger1 $ 164.00 NOTES
1 Fees are not subject to the City's established annual administrative revision and increase. Fees for the Community Garden - Annual Permits are prorated from a flat fee based on the month the permit is initially issued as follows:
a. First Quater: July - September: The amount noted on the fee schedule shall apply. b. Second Quarter: October - December: 75% of the amount noted on the fee schedule shall apply. c. Third Quarter: January - March: 50% of the amount noted on the fee schedule shall apply. d. 4th Quarter: April - June: 25 % of the amount noted on the fee schedule shall apply.

Garden plots are permitted to Santa Monica residents only in accordance with conditions set forth in the Community Gardens Permit Agreement.

Office of Sustainability and the Environment L-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit M - Department of Transportation: Taxis
Service FY 2022-23
Annual base franchise fee per taxicab company - set by ordinance $ 5,000.00 Annual franchise fee per vehicle in taxicab fleet - set by ordinance $ 452.00 New vehicle permit fee $ 135.78
Transfer vehicle permit fee $ 135.78
Renewal vehicle permit fee $ 81.47
Replacement vehicle permit fee $ 43.45
Vehicle re-inspection fee $ 54.31
New and renewal taxicab driver’s permit application fee $ 54.31 Taxicab driver’s permit re-examination fee $ 74.92
Taxicab driver’s permit transfer fee $ 74.92
Taxicab driver’s permit replacement fee $ 54.31
Mileage Rates-flag drop, first 1/9th mile $ 3.50
Mileage Rates - each additional 1/9th mile1
$ 0.40
Mileage Rates - each 37 seconds waiting/delay2
$ 0.40
Airport Flat Rates - North of I-10 to Los Angeles International Airport $ 45.00 Airport Flat Rates - South of I-10 to Los Angeles International Airport $ 40.00 Santa Monica to Bob Hope Airport $ 95.00
Fees are not subject to the City's annual Administration revision and increase.

NOTES:

1. Franchisee and Vehicle Franchise fees are due on January 1st of each year.

2. Vehicle permit renewal fees are due on or before December 31st of each year.

6. Senior Citizens (persons age 65 and older) and persons with disabilities (including persons with a Los Angeles County Transit Operators Association Metro Disabled Identity Card) shall be given a ten percent (10%) taxicab fare discount. The discount shall apply to all destinations and trips.
1 The fee for FY 2022-23 is shown in the amount that is charged to the customer - 1/9th of a mile.
2 The fee for FY 2022-23 is shown in the amount that is charged to the customer - each 37 seconds of delay.

3. Driver permit renewal fees are due between November 1st and December 31st of each year.

4.New taxicab driver permit fees shall be prorated monthly based on the number of calendar months remaining until the permit expires in accordance with Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 6.49.050(d).

5. If a due date falls on a weekend day or holiday, the due date is the next City of Santa Monica business day following the due date.

Taxicabs M - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit N - Department of Transportation: Pedicabs
Service Fee as of 7/1/22
New & Renewal Operators Permit Fee1 $253.14
Pedicab Vehicle Decal Permit Fee:

New pedicab vehicle permit fee $145.39
Transfer pedicab vehicle permit fee $145.39
Renewal pedicab vehicle permit fee $66.19
Replacement pedicab vehicle permit fee $46.72
Pedicab vehicle re-inspection fee $36.34
1 Fee is suspended until further notice.

Pedicabs N-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 1
A. Community Aquatics:
(1) Recreational and Fitness Swim
Youth1 Adult2 Senior/Student3 Family4
Daily Use
- Residents $2.00 $4.50 $2.25
- Non-Residents $4.00 $9.00 $4.50
Family Use (per day)
- Residents n/a n/a $10.25
- Non-Residents n/a n/a $20.50
Swim Pass (20 swims per pass)
- Residents $25.00 $68.25 $37.50
- Non-Residents $50.00 $137.00 $75.00
1Youth (17 years and under)
2Adults (18 years – 59 years) 3Others: Seniors (60 years and over); Students (18 years or older attending high school, college or trade school full-time with I.D.) 4Family (up to 2 adults and 2 children, additional children admitted at swim center rate) Available Friday night, Saturday and Sunday
(2) Adult and Youth Group Swim Lessons:
a) Residents $53.00 per session
b) Non-residents $105.00 per session
(3) Youth Semi-Private Swim Lessons:
a) Residents $91.00 per session
b) Non-residents $183.00 per session
(4) Specialty Classes: Resident Non-Resident
a) Junior Lifeguard Program $132.00 $166.00
b) Lifeguard Training $221.00 $259.00
c) Water Safety Instructor $275.00 $313.00
d) Diving & Water Polo $ 106.00 $210.00
(5) Aquatics Supplies Fees: Fees will be assessed to cover the actual cost of the items and a portion of administrative expenses.
(6) Shark Youth Swim Team:
a) Residents $144 per session
b) Non-residents $202 per session
*$5.00 Material Fee for Sharks
(7) Fitness Classes: Fees for Shallow or Deep Water Wet Workout/Aqua Aerobics and Fitness Classes
Resident Non-Resident
a) Adult $ 6.00 $12.00
b) Adult Fitness Class Pass* $53.00 $105.00
c) Senior/Student $ 3.00 $ 6.00

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 2
d) Senior/Student Fitness Pass* $27.00 $53.00
*Passes are good for 10 classes, and are non-refundable, non-transferable and non-interchangeable. (8) Aquatics Staffing Fee:

Aquatic Staffing fees shall be billed to the applicant in 30-minute increments for each staff on duty for the duration of the reservation. Fees for staff services are charged to the organization(s) utilizing aquatics facilities outside normal operating hours. Staffing fees are billed in additional to lane rental fees.

Staffing Fee
Hourly
Rate
Swim Instructor/Lifeguard $19.40
Chief Pool Lifeguard $25.23
Guest Services Assistant $23.08
Aquatics Program Coordinator $31.56
* The number of City Aquatic Staff required for an activity or event shall be based on the City’s Aquatics Supervision Standards and may require additional program, facility, or maintenance personnel due to the size or nature of the event. Lifeguard services are defined as on-deck supervision of water activities by City lifeguards. This will be determined at the time of application approval. **This fee may be divided if there are two or more permittees utilizing the facility at one time. ***Permits outside of regular operating hours must be a minimum of 2 hours, with the exception of those permits that are in conjunction with/adjacent to current operating hours.

B. Community Activities:

Gym User Fee: The fees charged for gym use shall help offset the cost of staffing, lights, maintenance and equipment, and shall be as follows:
1Adults (18-49 years old) 2Seniors (50 and older)
Youth Adult1 Seniors2
Daily Use Pass
- Resident $1.50 $3.00 $1.50
- Non Resident $1.50 $4.50 $3.00
Quarterly Passes
- Resident $15.00 $33.00 $16.00
- Non Resident $20.00 $40.00 $20.00

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 3
C. Tennis Court Reservation Rate: City park and Santa Monica High School Courts when used by the City pursuant to agreements with the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District are reserved. (1) Resident Hourly rates (payable in advance) $4.00 per hour, per person, per court Non-resident Hourly rates $5.00 per hour, per person, per court (2) Resident Quarterly passes are valid for 91 days from the date of purchase:
a) Youth (17 years and under) $22.00
b) Adults (18 years – 59 years) $65.00
c) Seniors (60 years and over) $22.00
(3) Resident Tennis Reservation Cards $14.00
(4) No Show Fee $4.00 per hour
No Show Fee (instructors) $8.00 per hour
(no shows or cancellation less than 24 hours in advance of scheduled time) (5) Independent Instructor court fee:

Number of students: 1-3 $17.00 per hour
$ 8.75 per ½ hour
Number of students: 4-7 $25.00 per hour
$12.50 per ½ hour
Group lessons of more than 4 are only allowed through the City’s Community Programs Division.
(6) Santa Monica – based Private Schools $11.00 per hour per court (7) Santa Monica –based Non-Profit Organizations $11.00 per hour per court waived for youth organizations
(8) Ball Machine Fee $14.00 per hour
D. *CREST Out of School Time programs: The CREST program is a joint program between the City and the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District. The following fees represent the fees for the City portion of the program.

Service Hours of Service Days of Service Fee
CREST Club School dismissal until
6:00 p.m.

School year only - no
breaks $375/
month
Single Full Day
Care
8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Pupil Free Day and Single
Day Camp
$82/day
E. *CREST Enrichment – A registration fee will be assessed to cover contractor payment. Participants shall pay for activity materials, if applicable.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 4
Registration Fee $143 - $237 per child per class
F. Camp Programs:

Day/Sports Camps
- Resident Full Day $450
- Resident Half day $280
- Non Resident Full day $500
- Non Resident Half day $310
- Extended Care $70
G. SM Adaptive Recreation and Sports Social Programs: A fee will be assessed to cover the direct cost of the activity.

H. Adult Sports Leagues: A fee will be assessed to cover costs for supplies and a portion of administrative expenses. Officiating fees are additional and paid directly to officials.

Team Fee per Season Residents
Residents / SM
Workers
NonResidents
Basketball $354 $401 $441
Volleyball $268 $307 $334
Softball – Men’s $500 $579 $648
Softball – Women’s $420 $483 $546
Softball – Co-ed $477 $548 $617
Softball – Tournament $241 $272 $305
Registration Priority and Definitions
1) Resident Teams – At least 60% of players must live in Santa Monica 2) Residents/SM Workers – At least 60% of players must live or work in Santa Monica. 3) Non-Resident Teams – Less than 60% of players live or work in Santa Monica I. Drop-in Soccer Program: The fees charged for field use shall help offset the cost of staffing, lights, maintenance and equipment, and shall be as follows:

Youth Adult1 Seniors2
Daily Use Pass
- Resident $1.00 $3.00 $1.00
- Non Resident $1.00 $5.00 $2.00
1Adults (18-49 years old) 2Seniors (50 and older)

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 5
J. Skate Park Fees: A fee will be assessed to cover supplies and a portion of administrative expenses. 1 Valid 91 days from date of purchase
K. Memorial Park Fitness Room Fees
(1) $ 4.00 per entry residents
(2) $ 6.00 per entry non-residents
(3) $26.00 4 week pass – resident
(4) $35.00 4 week pass – non-resident
(5) $ 2.00 Seniors - per entry residents
(6) $ 3.00 Seniors - per entry non-residents
(7) $13.00 Seniors - 4 week pass – resident
(8) $17.00 Seniors - 4 week pass – non-resident
(9) $11.00 per hour personal training permit (1-2 clients) (10) $ 5.00 per ½ hour personal training permit (1-2 clients) L. Activity Passport Replacement Card
(1) $ 1.00 Residents
(2) $ 2.00 Non-Residents
(3) $ 1.00 Employee Fitness Pass
M. Pickleball
(1) $3.00 Residents
(2) $5.00 Non-Residents
N. Community Classes Administration Fee
$5.50 per class registration
NOTES:

Administrative, registration, and materials fees may be assessed for all social service, recreation and community programs, classes One-Time Registration Youth Adult
- Resident $10.00 $15.00
- Non Resident $10.00 $16.50
Daily Pass
- Resident Skate Park & BMX $3.00 $5.00
- Non-Resident Skate Park & BMX $5.00 $5.50
Quarterly Pass1
- Resident Skate Park $20.00 $35.00
- Non-Resident Skate Park $20.00 $38.50
- Resident BMX $10.00 $20.00
- Non-Resident BMX $10.00 $25.00
Annual Pass
- Resident Skate Park $80.00 $140.00
- Non Resident Skate Park $80.00 $154.00
- Resident BMX $35.00 $75.00
- Non-Resident BMX $35.00 $95.00

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit O - Community Services Program Fees
Fees as of 7/1/22 – Per Resolution No. _____ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Programs O - 6
and services that are listed.

Fees to be charged for social service, recreation and community programs which are not listed shall be determined by the Community and Cultural Services Director and shall be based upon the costs incurred in providing the program.

Fee reductions, waiver, or reasonable and customary payment plans may be approved administratively to promote community access to special events and other social and recreational programming.

Beach parking fees will be waived:

A. For registered participants of City classes occurring at the beach and Ocean View Tennis Courts for the duration of the class.

B. To allow time for drop-off and pick-up of registered participants of City youth camps occurring at the beach.

C. For City-authorized contractors and their employees while conducting City activities at the beach and Ocean View Tennis Courts.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit P1: Community Services

COMMUNITY MEETING ROOMS
Maximum Capacity Hourly Rate
Effective 7-1-22
18-60 $33.00
90-130 $67.00
18-60 $47.00
90-130 $95.50
18-60 $16.50
90-130 $33.00
Must have at least 50% Santa Monica residents.

Large rooms available at:

Joslyn Park
Marine Park
Reed Park
Virginia Avenue Park
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

Reed Park: 1150 Lincoln Blvd.

Memorial Park: 1401 Olympic
Euclid Park: 1525 Euclid Street
Insurances as determined by the City's Risk Manager may be required.

Park building rooms are not available for commercial ventures.

Douglas Park: 2439 Wilshire Blvd.

Joslyn Park: 633 Kensington
Marine Park: 1406 Marine Street
Virginia Avenue Park: 2200 Virginia Avenue
Euclid Park
Joslyn Park
Memorial Park
Reed Park
Virginia Avenue Park
Large
Large
Park Building Rental Charges
Room Size
Residents :

Small
Rental Fees as of 7-1-22. Fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increaseunless otherwise noted.

Small rooms available at:

Douglas Park
Non-Residents:

Small
Large
Santa Monica based non-profit organizations:

Small
Normal room rental hours of operation are 8:00 a.m. - 11:00 p.m. daily, excluding City Holidays.

Virginia Avenue Park room rental hours of operation are: Saturday & Sunday from 8am - 10pm.

A rental charge of $2.69/hr up to 20 hr/week will be assessed to the Santa Monica Lawn Bowling Club for use of the Douglas Park Clubhouse. Hours above 20 hours per week will be charged the Douglas Park Clubhouse facilities rental rate.

Based on availability, a staffing fee of $20.69 (FY 2022-23 rate) per hour will be assessed for usage outside of operating hours.

Capacities vary by facility depending upon square footage, placing of exits, amount of furniture and equipment in the room. Listed capacities are an approximation.

Rates for filming in park buildings are listed in a separate list.

Facility permits are issued according to the facility permitting guidelines. User categories are defined in exhibit P8 of this resolution.

Rental rate waivers may be available for collaborative programs with the City, City sponsored programs, and SM based non-profit youth groups.

Non-SM rates for Reed Park are the same as SM rates due to Proposition A funding requirements.

Staffing fees shall be subject to the annual administrative increase set forth in this Resolution.

Park Building Rentals P1-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit P2: Community Services
Chairs only Chairs/Tables
18' x 26' 40 24/4 - 30/5 $ 28.00 $ 21.00
20' x 30' 50 24/4 - 30/5 $ 28.00 $ 21.00
$ 57.00 $ 42.00
NOTES

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

Filming rates are listed in a separate list.

Staffing fees shall be subject to the annual administrative increase set forth in this resolution.

Insurances as determined by the City's Risk Manager may be required.

Rental Fees as of 7-1-22. Fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase-unless otherwise noted.

The rental rates indicated above are per hour of use.

Permits requested on City holidays will be granted dependent upon staffing availability. A staffing fee will be assessed in addition to the rental fee. City holidays are: New Year's Eve, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving & day after, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.

Capacity varies depending upon square footage, placing of exits, amount of furniture and equipment in the room. Listed capacities are an approximation.

Definitions for user groups are stated in Exhibit P8 of this resolution.

Rental rate waivers may be available for City funded non-profit organizations and SM neighborhood groups.

The Ken Edwards Center is not available for commercial ventures.

Hourly Rate
7-1-22
Non-profit
Sr Services 7-1-22
Ken Edwards Center hours are Mon - Thur. 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m., Fri. & Sat. 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Uses outside of these times will require a staffing fee of $20.69 (FY 2022-23 rate) per hour, based on availability.

Ken Edwards Center Rental Charges
103 or 104 or 105
100 A
100 A & B
Room
Capacity
Approximate
Dimensions
Ken Edwards Center P2-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit P3a: Community Services
Low
Intensity *
High
Intensity ** Lights Half Full
$ 2.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 52.00 $ 94.00 $ 13.00
$ 16.00 $ 24.00 $ 16.00 $ 52.00 $ 94.00 $ 13.00
$ 33.00 $ 40.00 $ 33.00 n/a n/a $ 36.00
$ 4.00 $ 8.00 $ 7.00 $ 76.00 $ 134.00 $ 16.00
$ 24.00 $ 33.00 $ 24.00 $ 76.00 $ 134.00 $ 16.00
$ 40.00 $ 49.00 $ 39.00 n/a n/a $ 73.00
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Per Court
$ 11.00 $ 11.00 $ 11.00 per hour
$ 16.00 $ 16.00 $ 16.00 per hour
$ 33.00 $ 33.00 $ 33.00 per hour
$ 26.00 $ 26.00 $ 26.00 per day

1. 2.

The above field rental fees are in effect for the following field locations during the hours indicated:

Clover Park 8:00am - 10:00pm Marine Park 8:00am - 10:00pm 2600 Ocean Park Blvd. daily 1406 Marine Street daily
Memorial Park 8:00am - 10:00pm Gandara Park  (no lights) 8:00am - dusk 1401 Olympic Blvd. daily 1819 Stewart Street daily
Los Amigos (no lights) 3:00pm - dusk John Adams Middle School 5:00pm - 10:00pm 500 Holister Avenue school yr, weekdays 16th and Ocean Park Blvd. school yr, weekdays 8:00am - 10:00pm 8:00am - 10:00pm
weekends & Summer weekends & school breaks
Airport Park 8:00am - 10.30pm Franklin Elementary 9:00am - dusk 3201 Airport Park Drive daily 2400 Montana Avenue Saturdays Grant Elementary 9:00am - dusk Roosevelt Elementary 9:00am - dusk 2368 Pearl Street Saturdays 801 Montana Avenue Saturdays McKinley Elementary 9:00am - dusk Rogers Elementary 9:00am - dusk 2401 Santa Monica Blvd. Saturdays 2401 14th Street Saturdays Lincoln Middle School; 5pm-10pm school yr, weekdays Civic Field *official name TBD8:00am - 10:30pm 1501 California Ave. 8am-10pm weekends & school breaks 1840 4th Street daily Edison Elementary 9:00am - dusk
2402 Virginia Ave. Saturdays
Beach Volleyball Court Locations
Ocean View North: 2400 Barnard Way adjacent to Parking Lot 4 1640 Appian Way: adjacent to Parking Lot 1
810 PCH (Sorrento): adjacent to Parking Lot 8
445 PCH: adjacent to Parking Lot 10
** High Intensity sports include soccer, football, rugby, field hockey, lacrosse, frisbee Ocean View South: 2600 Barnard Way adjacent to 1150 PCH: adjacent to Parking Lot 3 * Low Intensity sports include baseball, softball, kick-ball Categories
Commercial -Seasonal Use
Commercial - Occasional Use
Tournament Rate
Non-Profit Organizations, Private Schools, and
Community Groups/Individuals
Camps
Beach Volleyball & Soccer Courts
Non-Residents
Memorial Gym Effective
7/1/22
All permittees; no show or cancellation within 3 days
(72 hours) prior to their permitted time or do not
show up for their permitted time.

Non-Profit Organizations, Private Schools, NonResidents Public Schools and Community Groups/Individuals
Field Rentals Effective 7/1/22
$25 per hour penalty fee for permitted
time
Field Rental Late Cancellation or No Show Penalty
Outdoor Basketball
Court Effective 7/1/22
Sports Facilities Rental Charges
Fields, Gymnasium, Basketball and Beach Soccer & Volleyball Courts, Concession Stands and Storage The Artificial Turf Staffing Fee at Airport Park will continue to be waived for SM Public Schools (K - 12). For all other groups, an hourly staffing fee of $32.32 (FY 2022-23 rate) will be assessed for usage of all artificial turf and natural grass fields (FSAC groups only, depending on seasonal demand).

Staffing fees shall be subject to the annual administrative increase set forth in this resolution.

Rental Fees as of 7-1-22.  Fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase-unless otherwise noted.

Camps
Residents:

Youth Groups
Youth Groups
Schools/Non-Profits/Community
Fees per Hour
Sports Facilities Rentals P3a-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit P3b: Community Services
FY 2022-23 Rental Rate: $453.64 per month
Parks School sites
Los Amigos Franklin Elementary
Memorial Grant Elementary
Clover Roosevelt Elementary
Gandara John Muir Elementary
Marine Rogers Elementary
Airport
FY 2022-23 Rental Rate: $1.20 per square foot per month

1. 2.

3. Sports Facilities Rental Charges - Field Concession Stands /Storage Storage Facilities
Storage Facilities can be found at the following parks and school sites:

Concession Stands
Memorial Park and Los Amigos Park
Youth Sports Groups holding seasonal permits.

Rental Rate not applicable for City programs.

Rental Fees as of 7-1-22
NOTES:

Youth Sports Groups and Private Schools holding seasonal permits Rental Rate not applicable for City programs.

Storage areas and square footage are stated on the Field Storage sheet.

Concession and storage charges shall be subject to the annual administrative increase set forth in this resolution.

Groups may be permitted use of storage facilities and concession stands only during seasonal permit time for the permitted sport. User may be required to share with other organizations and not have exclusive use.

Sports Facilities Rentals P3b-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit P4: Community Services
NP /Student /
Educational
Effective 7/1/22
Motion Still Motion/Still
Daily Daily Daily
Club House $ 453.22 $ 258.62 $ 64.90
Craft Room $ 453.22 $ 258.62 $ 64.90
CAB 1/3 $ 453.22 $ 258.62 $ 64.90
Craft Room $ 453.22 $ 258.62 $ 64.90
Aud. East or Aud. West $ 453.22 $ 258.62 $ 64.90
Card Room $ 453.22 $ 258.62 $ 64.90
Patio $ 453.22 $ 258.62 $ 64.90
Meeting Rm $ 453.22 $ 258.62 $ 64.90
Auditorium $ 649.09 $ 389.20 $ 97.35
Auditorium $ 649.09 $ 389.20 $ 97.35
CAB 2/3 $ 649.09 $ 389.20 $ 97.35
CAB Full $ 649.09 $ 389.20 $ 97.35
Auditorium Full $ 649.09 $ 389.20 $ 97.35
Addition $ 649.09 $ 389.20 $ 97.35
Auditorium $ 649.09 $ 389.20 $ 97.35
Auditorium $ 649.09 $ 389.20 $ 97.35
Small Meeting Room $ 453.22 $ 258.62 $ 64.90
100A & 100B $ 649.09 $ 389.20 $ 97.35
103 - 105 $ 649.09
Euclid Park, East or West Room $ 453.22
NP / Student /
Educational
Motion Still Motion/Still
Daily Daily Daily
Full Gymnasium $ 2,076.61 $ 973.02 $ 649.09
1/2 Gymnasium $ 1,038.30 $ 485.87 $ 324.53
The Cove, SM Skatepark $ 2,076.61 $ 973.02 $ 649.09
Ballfield No lights $ 453.22 $ 323.91 $ 129.81
Ballfield With Lights $ 453.22 $ 323.91 $ 129.81
Basketball Court $ 453.22 $ 323.91 $ 129.81
Tennis Court $ 453.22 $ 323.91 $ 129.81
Beach Volleyball Courts $ 453.22 $ 323.91 $ 129.81

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

Douglas Park
Joslyn Park
Memorial Park
Facility Filming Rental Charges
Rental Fees as of 7-1-22
Building Room
Senior Rec. Cntr
Memorial Park
Reed Park
Reed Park
Senior Rec. Cntr
Virg Ave. Park
Joslyn Park
Marine Park
Memorial Park
Memorial Park
Reed Park
Senior Rec. Cntr
Various Parks
Various Parks
SM State Beach
NOTES:

These charges are in addition to any permits or licenses required for conducting business or filming in the City of Santa Monica.

Filming Effective
7/1/22
Filming
Memorial Park
Memorial Park
Memorial Park
Various Parks
Virg Ave. Park
Ken Edwards
Euclid Park
Location Sports Facilities
Various Parks
Daily rate constitutes an eight (8) hour day depending upon availbility by location.

Facility Filming Rental Charges shall be subject to the annual administrative increase set forth in this resolution.

Additional compensation may be required for filming in the event a scheduled activity or permit is displaced.

Rates for Sports Facilities vary depending upon use of lights, necessary staffing, City sponsorship, type of use.

Insurances as determined by the City's Risk Manager may be required.

A staffing fee of $20.69 (FY 2022-23 rate) hour will be assessed for facility usage outside of normal operating hours and shall be subject to the annual administrative increase set forth in this resolution.

Additional charges may be assessed for damage to the facility interior, exterior or its furnishings.

Facility Filming Rentals P4-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit P5: Community Services

1. Non-Profit Youth Aquatics Program
Short Course
FY2022-23
Long Course
FY2022-23
Santa Monica Based $ 6.00 $ 12.00 per lane per hour
Non-Santa Monica Based $ 12.00 $ 24.00 per lane per hour

2. Non-Profit Adult Aquatics Program and Private Schools Santa Monica Based $ 11.00 $ 22.00 per lane per hour
Non-Santa Monica Based $ 22.00 $ 44.00 per lane per hour

3. Other Organizations and Businesses
Santa Monica Based $ 23.00 $ 46.00 per lane per hour
Non-Santa Monica Based $ 46.00 $ 92.00 per lane per hour

4. Tournaments - Fitness Pool Only
Santa Monica Based Non-profit Youth Aquatics Group $ 225.00 per hour Santa Monica Based Non-profit Adult Aquatics Group $ 375.00 per hour

5. Room Rental (2 hour minimum)
April - October
Santa Monica-based Non-profit Groups & Community Groups $ 90.00 per hour Non-Santa Monica-based Non-profit and Community Groups $ 114.00 per hour November - March
Santa Monica-based Non-profit Groups & Community Groups $ 50.00 per hour Non-Santa Monica-based Non-profit and Community Groups $ 75.00 per hour

6. Filming Fees
Motion Still
Splash or Fitness Pool $ 500.00 $ 300.00
Per Lane Rate $ 64.00 $ 32.00
Deck Only Rate $ 300.00 $ 150.00

1. 2.

3. 4. These fees are in addition to any permits or licenses required for conducting filming in the City of Santa Monica. Per lane usage is permitted only if lanes are rented when the facility is already in use. Additional compensation may be required for filming in the event a scheduled activity or permit is displaced. Additional fees may be assessed for damage to the facility interior or exterior. Pool rental fees are based on the usage of the pool requested and the Sun Deck with Meeting Room if available. Per lane rental and deck only rentals do not include use of the Meeting Room. Room rental fees apply.

Santa Monica Aquatics Facility - Rental Charges
Rental Fees as of 7/1/22; Fees is this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Category
FY2022-23
FY2022-23
Hourly rates FY2022-23
FEE CATEGORY NOTES:

Aquatics groups (teams and clubs) only; must have 50% residency participation to be Santa Monica based.

Aquatics groups (teams and clubs) only; must have 50% residency participation to be Santa Monica based. Includes Santa Monicabased primary and secondary private schools.

Includes room rental, staff facility supervision and recreational swim for up to 20 youth for parties. The City will not provide catering, decorations or direct staff involvement in leading activities.

Swim Center Rentals P5-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit P6-Community Services
Rental Fees as of 7-1-22.  Fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase-unless otherwise noted.

Douglas Park Lawn Bowling Green1
Annual Maintenance Charge FY2022-23
$ 2,266.13
FY2022-23
Residents (up to 150 people) $ 77.00 per 4-hour block
each additional hour $ 18.00 per hour
Non-Residents (up to 150 people) $ 116.00 per 4-hour block each additional hour $ 27.00 per hour
$ 6,508.69

1. Fee subject to the City's annual administrative revision and increase.

NOTES:

Group BBQ/Picnic areas
Groups over 150 people must apply for a Community Events Permits.

Use of the Douglas Park Lawn Bowling Green is currently permitted to the Santa Monica Lawn Bowling Miscellaneous Facilities and Fees
Cultural Arts Development Requirement Application Processing Fee1 Miscellaneous Facilities Rentals P6-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-1

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

FACILITY USER CATEGORIES
PARK BUILDING USER CATEGORIES (see Exhibit P1)
Permits for Park Building Meeting Rooms shall be granted according to the user categories listed below in priority order:

City Programs, Events and Meetings
The City of Santa Monica conducts meetings and offers a range of programs and events for youth, adults and persons with disabilities. These programs and events are offered by the Community Services Department which has first priority use of the Park Building Meeting Rooms. Rental fees are not applicable.

Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Groups/Organizations
Santa Monica has a wide network of non-profit organizations with 501(c)3, 501(c)4 or 501 (c) 6 non-profit status. These groups provide a range of human services, education and recreational programs and events to Santa Monica residents. They may serve the general public or special user groups such as seniors, youth, or persons with disabilities. These programs may be free, or attendees may pay a fee for service, a membership fee or a voluntary donation. At least 50% of the organization’s members must be Santa Monica residents. To be in this user category, the organization must be in good standing with the State of California, verified annually. Self-help groups are exempt from the State verification and at least 50% of meeting attendees must be Santa Monica residents. This category also includes governmental agencies. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Santa Monica Residents
Informal community groups or individuals that do not have tax-exempt non-profit status and are not a business entity but provide community services or citizen participation opportunities to Santa Monica residents are in this category. These events may be meetings, social events or educational or recreation activities. Events and meetings are

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-2
either offered free or an unspecified voluntary donation may be requested to cover the costs of the event or meeting. The permit applicant must be a Santa Monica resident.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Non-Santa Monica-based Community Groups and Individuals These users are non-profit organizations without 50% or more attendees being Santa Monica residents or meet the definition of the Santa Monica Residents category however the permit applicant is not a Santa Monica resident.

KEN EDWARDS CENTER (KEC) USER CATEGORIES (see Exhibit P2) Permits for Ken Edwards Center shall be granted according to the Ken Edwards Center Permitting Guidelines. User categories are defined below.

Non-Profit Organizations
501(c)3 or 501(c)4 non-profit community-based organizations, that are funded through the Human Services Grants Program, Cultural Arts Organizational Support Grant Program, or CO-Arts Grant Program of the City of Santa Monica; plus approved Santa Monica neighborhood groups are allowed use of the KEC at no charge for 300 meeting hours each fiscal year. Agencies using more than 300 hours during any fiscal year will be charged the non-profit/community rental fee for those hours over 300. Other 501(c)3 or 501(c)4 non-profit human services organizations meeting the human services needs of Santa Monica residents but not funded directly by the City are charged the nonprofit/community rate. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Non-Profit Senior Service Organizations
Non-profit organizations with 501(c)3 or 501(c)4 status, not funded by the City of Santa Monica, that provide senior programming consistent with the City’s Housing and Human Services Division and meet the needs of Santa Monica’s senior citizens are in this category. To encourage a full range of senior services, these organizations shall be

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-3
charged the non-profit Senior Services rate. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Community Groups
Those organizations without 501(c)3 or 501(c)4 status convening meetings with a focus on human service issues that will benefit low and moderate-income Santa Monica residents are included in this category. These meetings are free of charge and open to the public. An unspecified voluntary donation may be collected to cover the costs of having the meeting. Such groups are charged the non-profit/community group rental fee.

Non-profit organizations conducting fund raising events are also in this category.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Filming (See Exhibit P4)
Companies or individuals desiring to take still or motion pictures in Ken Edwards Center are in this category. A film permit must be obtained from the City of Santa Monica in addition to a Ken Edwards Center rental permit. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

SPORTS FACILITIES USER CATEGORIES (see Exhibit P3a)
Permits for fields will be issued in accordance with the Field Permitting Guidelines.

Youth Sports Groups
Community–based athletic non-profit organizations or sports groups with multiple teams and an established program that provides a continuum of opportunities to ensure diversity of users or the full range of skill levels are in this category. Groups must demonstrate that 60% of their participants live in Santa Monica to receive the resident rate. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required. To be in this user category, verification of good standing with the State of California is required annually.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-4
Primary and Secondary Private Schools
Primary and secondary private schools offering sports programs are in this category.

These schools must be based in Santa Monica to receive the resident rate.

Non-Profit Organizations
Organizations with 501(c)3 or 501(c)4 non-profit status offering sports programs and events to Santa Monica residents are in this category. They may serve the general public or special user groups such as seniors, youth, or persons with disabilities. These programs may be free, or attendees may pay a fee for service, a membership fee or a voluntary donation. To be in this user category, verification of good standing with the State of California is required annually. These organizations must have membership of at least 60% residents to qualify for the resident rate. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Community Groups and Individuals
Sports groups/teams who do not qualify as a Youth Sports Group and individuals desiring use of a sports facility are in this category. Programs are either offered free or an unspecified voluntary donation may be requested to cover costs. Groups/teams requesting seasonal permits must demonstrate that 60% of their participants live in Santa Monica to qualify for the Santa Monica resident rate. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

Camps
Organizations conducting youth or adult sports camps are in this category. A voluntary donation or fee for service may be requested to cover costs. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required. Camps must be based in Santa Monica to receive the resident rate.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-5
FILMING USER CATEGORIES (see Exhibit P4)
Filming
Companies or individuals desiring to take still or motion pictures in City facilities are in this category. A filming permit must be obtained from the City of Santa Monica in addition to a facility rental permit. Insurances as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

SANTA MONICA AQUATICS FACILITIES (see Exhibit P5)
Permits for the Santa Monica run aquatics facilities shall be granted according to the priority usage categories listed below. There are two lists, the first will be used when permitting the Santa Monica Swim Center, the second outlines the priority groups for Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District facilities when operated by the city. In the event that there are competing demands within a user priority, staff will use additional factors as indicated in the Pool Allocation Guidelines to allocate pool space to ensure a balance of programming is available to residents.

Santa Monica Swim Center Priority Usage Categories:

1. City Programs
The City of Santa Monica offers a range of sports programs for youth, adults and persons with disabilities. These programs are offered by the Community Services Department which has first priority use of the City of Santa Monica run aquatic facilities. Rental fees are not applicable.

2. Santa Monica College (SMC)
SMC offers a range of sports programs for students that may utilize the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities. Schedule, fees and fee waivers shall be based on a separate facility agreement between the City and SMC.

3. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD)

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-6
The SMMUSD offers a range of sport programs for students that may utilize City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities.

4. Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations – Youth Aquatics/Sports Programs A community-based athletic non-profit organization or aquatics group whose youth program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is 50% or more Santa Monica residents. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

5. Non-Santa Monica-based Non-profit Organizations Permitting the Swim Center 2,000 hours or more annually – Youth Aquatics/Sports Programs A community-based athletic non-profit organization or aquatics group whose youth program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is less than 50% Santa Monica residents however use of the aquatics facilities is at least 2,000 hours annually. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

6. Santa Monica-based Primary and Secondary Private Schools Santa Monica-based primary and secondary private schools offering aquatics programs are in this category. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required

7. Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations - Adult Aquatics/Sports Programs Santa Monica-based aquatics group whose adult program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is 50% or more Santa Monica residents are in this category. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

8. Non-Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations permitting the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities 2,000 hours or more annually – Adult Aquatics/Sports Programs

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-7
A community-based aquatics group whose adult program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is less than 50% Santa Monica residents however use of the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is at least 2,000 hours annually. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

9. Other Santa Monica-based Organizations and Businesses Santa Monica residents, Santa Monica-based organizations (not meeting the criteria of higher user categories), Santa Monica-based private businesses and commercial camp organizers and Santa Monica-based special event promoters are in this category.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

10. Other Non-Santa Monica-based Organizations and Businesses Non-Santa Monica residents, youth or adult aquatics groups (not meeting the criteria of higher user categories), non-Santa Monica-based private businesses, commercial camp organizations, and non-Santa Monica-based special event promoters are in this category.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

11. Filming
Companies or individuals desiring to take still or motion pictures using aquatics facilities are in this category. A film permit must be obtained from the City of Santa Monica in addition to a facility rental permit. Insurances as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

SMMUSD Aquatic Facilities Priority Usage Categories:

1. City Programs
The City of Santa Monica offers a range of sports programs for youth, adults and persons with disabilities. These programs are offered by the Community Services Department which has first priority use of the City of Santa Monica run aquatic facilities. Rental fees are not applicable.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-8

2. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD) The SMMUSD offers a range of sport programs for students that may utilize City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities.

3. Santa Monica College (SMC)
SMC offers a range of sports programs for students that may utilize the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities. Schedule, fees and fee waivers shall be based on a separate facility agreement between the City and SMC.

4. Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations – Youth Aquatics/Sports Programs A community-based athletic non-profit organization or aquatics group whose youth program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is 50% or more Santa Monica residents. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

5. Non-Santa Monica-based Non-profit Organizations Permitting the Swim Center 2,000 hours or more annually – Youth Aquatics/Sports Programs A community-based athletic non-profit organization or aquatics group whose youth program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is less than 50% Santa Monica residents however use of the aquatics facilities is at least 2,000 hours annually. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

6. Santa Monica-based Primary and Secondary Private Schools Santa Monica-based primary and secondary private schools offering aquatics programs are in this category. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required

7. Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations - Adult Aquatics/Sports Programs Santa Monica-based aquatics group whose adult program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is 50% or more Santa Monica residents are in this category. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT P7: Community Services – Facility User Categories P7-9

8. Non-Santa Monica-based Non-Profit Organizations permitting the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities 2,000 hours or more annually – Adult Aquatics/Sports Programs
A community-based aquatics group whose adult program participation at the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is less than 50% Santa Monica residents however use of the City of Santa Monica run aquatics facilities is at least 2,000 hours annually. Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

9. Other Santa Monica-based Organizations and Businesses Santa Monica residents, Santa Monica-based organizations (not meeting the criteria of higher user categories), Santa Monica-based private businesses and commercial camp organizers and Santa Monica-based special event promoters are in this category.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

10. Other Non-Santa Monica-based Organizations and Businesses Non-Santa Monica residents, youth or adult aquatics groups (not meeting the criteria of higher user categories), non-Santa Monica-based private businesses, commercial camp organizations, and non-Santa Monica-based special event promoters are in this category.

Insurance as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

11. Filming
Companies or individuals desiring to take still or motion pictures using aquatics facilities are in this category. A film permit must be obtained from the City of Santa Monica in addition to a facility rental permit. Insurances as determined by the City’s Risk Manager may be required.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit Q: Community Services - Beach House
FY 2022-23
$12.00 per day
$3.00 per hour

ACTIVITIES
Pool Passes - Summer & Pop-Up Pool Days
Adult $10.00 per day
Senior (60+) $5.00 per day
Youth (1-17) $4.00 per day
Children Under 12 Months Free per day
Pool Passes - Sunset Swim
Adult $10.00 per day
Senior (60+) $5.00 per day
Event Fee $20.00
Series
Single Class/
Drop-in Rate
Semi-Private Swim Lessons $110.00 (2-wk session) N/A
Aqua Aerobics $11.00
Paddleboard Lessons $45.00
Floating Fitness $20.00

RENTALS
ACBH Court Reservations - Volleyball/Tennis/Soccer (Year-Round) Community Groups/Individuals $15.00 per hour
Non-Profit Organizations/Schools $15.00 per hour
Commercial - Occasional Use $33.00 per hour
Commercial - Seasonal Use $16.00 per hour
Camp $35.00 per hour
Tournament $26.00 per day
Walk-up: First Come, First Served Free
ACBH Canopy Reservations (Summer) $60.00 4 hours
Paddleboard Rentals (Year-Round) $45.00 2 hours
$65.00 4 hours
Beach House Facility Rental and Use Charges

4. The Beach House parking lots are hereby excluded from Resolution Number ____________establishing parking rates for beach parking lots in Santa Monica.

BEACH HOUSE
Rental Fees as of 7-1-22. F ees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

1. The rates to be charged for parking at the Beach House shall be fixed by the City Manager from time to time, but in no event shall exceed twelve dollars ($12.00) per day or three dollars ($3.00) per hour.

2. Use of residential parking permits is prohibited.

3. Disabled Placards and Senior Beach Parking passes will be accepted for day use parking at the Beach House.

Beach House Parking
Beach House Parking
Beach House Community Use Fees
The following fees are established for recreational facilities, services, programs, and classes. These fees may be updated periodically to reflect changes in the cost of living as measured by the growth of total city compensation.

CLASSES
N/A
N/A
To maximize the public access and enjoyment of the pool or other amenities, the Director may authorize from time to time temporarily or seasonally discounted fees. Such discounts may be made available to the public without preference or bias to any user group.
(1)  When instruction and other services are provided by a contract instructor, the fees charged for recreation and community programs at the Beach House shall be based on the cost of the contract plus administration and shall be no more than is reasonably necessary to cover the cost of the goods and services provided, plus administration.

N/A
Beach House Q-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit Q: Community Services - Beach House

BEACH HOUSE
Beach House Facility Rental and Use Charges
(2)  To maximize facility use by the public and revenue return to the City, the Director may fix any given rental rate at his or her discretion provided that such rate is commensurate with market rate for such rentals. (2)  When provided by the City, fees charged for recreation and community programs shall be determined by the Director of Community Services (“Director”) and shall be based on the costs incurred in providing the program, plus administration. (3)  A registration and/or materials fee may be assessed for programs, classes and services offered at the Beach House. (1)  The Director shall establish and update from time to time Facility Rental and Use Charges for private events or commercial filming that are commensurate with current market rates for comparable venues.

NOTES:

Fees and charges imposed for the use of Beach House facilities and services but not listed in this resolution shall be determined by the Director. Fees shall be based on the costs incurred in providing the facility or service, and charges shall be based on market conditions.

Beach House fee reductions or waivers may be approved administratively to promote community access to special events and other social and recreational programming.
(3)  Charges for up to 25% of certain classes of private rentals may be reduced by up to 50% for non-profit 501(c)3 organizations.

The Director shall establish and update from time to time the eligibility standards for this discount. The standards shall ensure that such discount opportunities are allocated fairly and without bias, shall specify the type of uses permitted, and shall list the facilities available.
(4)  Charges for certain private rentals may be reduced by up to 50% for governmental agencies. The Director shall establish and update from time to time the standards for this discount. The standards shall ensure that such discount opportunities are allocated fairly and without bias, shall specify the type of uses permitted, and shall list the facilities available. (5)  The Director may establish additional charges for goods and services associated with facility rentals at market rates, including but not limited to:
a. Security staffing and services
b. Parking attendant and services
c. Cleaning and trash removal services
d. Event production and management services
e. Furniture or equipment rentals
(6)  In accordance with industry standard practice, the Director may charge to the renter a percentage of gross receipts for all outside vendor contracts for services provided on-site during the facility rental. (7)  The Director may require a deposit or other security prior to issuance of a Facility Rental Agreement or Commercial Filming Permit. The policy regarding the amount of deposit and deposit return shall be established by the Director and revised from time to time in accordance with standard industry practices.
(8)  With Council approval, the City Manager may prepare a contract for facility rental management services in accordance with all applicable City, state, and federal laws. Any such contract shall be let. Such Contractor shall adhere to the fees and charges established in this Resolution. Additional fees or charges to cover the cost of services provided by the Contractor may be assessed upon written authorization by the City Manager.

Beach House Q-2

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit R: Community Event Fees
Rental Fees as of 7-1-22
Category of Event
Application Fee
FY2022-23 Unit
(A) Category 1 Events
16+ weeks in advance $ 89.12
12-15 weeks in advance $ 169.48
8-11 weeks in advance $ 338.98
(B) Category 2 Events1 $ 50.00
(C) Category 3 Events1
$ 50.00
(D) SMMUSD Events1 $ 50.00
(E) Pier Restoration Corporation and Bayside District Corporation produced events exempt Category of Event Administrative Fee
(A) Category 1 Events Only
Simple Events $ 107.96
Intermediate Events $ 463.27
Complex Events $ 789.71
(B) Pier Restoration Corporation and Bayside District Corporation produced events exempt Category of Event
Neighborhood
Notification Fee
(A) Category 1 Events
Fixed Venue Site $ 204.64
Extended Notification (for events extending beyond a fixed venue site) $ 0.70 per piece 2030 Ocean Avenue lot:

Small: $ 5,192.82 per day
Large: $ 10,385.65 per day
2600 Barnard Way lot:

Small: $ 2,596.40 per day
Large: $ 5,192.82 per day
1550 PCH lot:

Small: $ 2,596.40 per day
Medium: $ 5,192.82 per day
Large: $ 10,385.65 per day
Notes:
1 Fees are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Beach parking lots may be rented for community events as follows:

Community Event Fees
Community Events R-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit S: Community Services
Permit FY 2022-23
Fee
196.92
NOTES:

1. 2
3 Accredited educational institutions providing surf instructions are exempt from the permit fee and use charge.

Surf Instruction and Youth Group Beach/Water Activity Fees and Charges Surfing instruction or Youth Group Beach/Water Activity on Santa Monica State Beach Fees as of 7-1-22. Fees in this exhibit are subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

An additional charge consisting of a percentage of gross receipts shall be charged for authorization to provide surfing instruction and youth group beach/water activity on Santa Monica State Beach. The exact percentage of gross receipts to be paid shall be proposed by applicants and shall be a criterion used in the awards of permits.

Preference shall be granted to proposals with higher percentages. The minimum percentage shall be ten percent of gross receipts.

Youth Group Beach/Water Activity permittees that use the beach no more than twice a week are exempt from the permit fee and use charge.

Surf Instruction S-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit T - Library
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Unit
Interlibrary Loan Request (plus Lending Library Charges, if any) $ 5.00 Replacement of Lost Adult Library Card
$ 2.00
Replacement of Lost Children's Library Card
$ 1.00
Black & White Copy or Print $ 0.15
Color Copy or Print $ 0.50
11 x 17 Copy or Print $ 0.30
Internet session for extra time or those without Library cards $ 2.00 Image Archives High Resolution Electronic Files & Reprints $ 20.00

MEETING ROOM RESERVATION RATES
Room Rental Cancellation Fee
$ 25.00
Technology Package Fee $ 38.00
Deposit for MLK, Jr Auditorium $ 250.00
Deposit for all other meeting rooms $ 100.00
Main Library, 601 Santa Monica Blvd
Martin Luther King, Jr. Auditorium & Reception Room Use Martin Luther King, (MLK) Jr. Auditorium Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 240.00
Each Additional Hour $ 80.00
Piano Use $ 100.00
Security Staffing Fee Per Hour or Portion Thereof for use of Martin Luther King, Jr. Auditorium outside operating hours $ 70.00
Kitchen Use Per Hour or Portion Thereof $ 50.00
Multipurpose Room
Multipurpose Room Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 180.00
Each Additional Hour $ 60.00
Kitchen Use Per Hour or Portion Thereof $ 50.00
Community Meeting Room
Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 90.00
Each Additional Hour $ 30.00
Kitchen Use Per Hour or Portion Thereof $ 50.00
Fairview Branch Community Room, 2101 Ocean Park Blvd.

Fairview Branch Comm Room Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 90.00 Each Additional Hour $ 30.00
Security Staffing Fee Per Hour or Portion Thereof for use of branch meeting room outside operating hours $ 35.00
Montana Avenue Branch Community Room, 1704 Montana Avenue Montana Ave Branch Comm Room Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 90.00 Each Additional Hour $ 30.00
Security Staffing Fee Per Hour or Portion Thereof for use of branch meeting room outside operating hours $ 35.00
Ocean Park Branch Community Room, 2601 Main Street
Ocean Park Branch Comm Room Rental (3 Hour Minimum) $ 90.00 Each Additional Hour $ 30.00
Security Staffing Fee Per Hour or Portion Thereof for use of branch meeting room outside operating hours $ 35.00
Pico Branch Annex, 2201 Pico Blvd.

Pico Branch Annex Rental (2 Hour Minimum) $ 60.00
Each Additional Hour $ 30.00
Security Staffing Fee Per Hour or Portion Thereof for use of branch meeting room outside operating hours $ 35.00
Kitchen Use Per Hour or Portion Thereof $ 25.00
*These fees are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.* Library T-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit U: Community Services
Authorized By Resolution No. ______ (CCS)
Permit Fee
Fee
FY2022-23
Commercial Fitness or Athletic Instruction, Classes or Camps Permit $ 125.54 Permit fee if a Request for Proposal process, lottery or other allocation process is required. $ 188.32
Notes:

1. All permits expire December 31st of each year, regardless of date issued.

Use Charge
General Permit
Small group size (not more than 2) $ 450.00
Medium group size (not more than 10) $ 900.00
Large group size (more than 10) $ 1,350.00
$ -
Palisades Park Permit $ -
Small group size (not more than 2) $ 675.00
Medium group size (not more than 10) $ 1,350.00
Large group size (more than 10) $ 2,025.00
Note:

The annual use charge for permittees committing to use Reed Park exclusively for their training Commercial Fitness or Athletic Instruction, Classes or Camps at City Parks and at the Santa Monica Beach

2. Permit fees shall be subject to the City’s annual administrative revision and increase set forth in this resolution.

3. No more than 15 small and 15 medium or large permits may be issued for Palisades Park. A Request for Proposal process, lottery or other allocation process will be used to issue permits if applications received during the priority registration period exceed availability.

In addition to a Permit Fee, Permittee shall pay a quarterly flat rate use charge as indicated below. Charges are determined by the number of participants in the group and vary depending upon the park and/or beach location. The following charges are based on a calendar year quarter and are not pro-rated or refundable:

4. These permit fees do not apply to surf instruction for compensation and commercial. groups requiring a Youth Group Beach/Water Activity Permit.

Commercial Fitness/Athletic Instruction U-1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery*
Service Effective
7-1-22
Ground Burial
Adult Grave (Single-Interment) $ 12,165.80
Adult Grave (Double Interment) $ 19,382.80
Adult Grave (Double-Interment Privilege) $ 12,165.80
Adult Green Burial Grave (Single-Interment) $ 14,019.64 Place Ashes in Existing Green Burial Plot $ 1,216.58
Infant Grave $ 633.41
Cremation Grave (Single) $ 5,979.80
Cremation Grave (Double) $ 10,103.80
Cremation Grave (Multiple Interment Privilege) $ 5,979.80 Cremation Green Burial Grave $ 11,234.80
Place Ashes in Existing Full Size Grave (Multiple Interment Privilege) $ 1,216.58 Crypt Spaces
Crypt (Single) Row 1 $ 18,003.04
Crypt (Single) Row 2 $ 20,003.37
Crypt (Single) Row 3 $ 20,003.37
Crypt (Single) Row 4 $ 18,003.04
Crypt (Single) Row 5 $ 11,335.23
Crypt (Single) Row 6 $ 10,001.67
Crypt (Single) Row 7 $ 10,001.67
Crypt (Double) Row 1 $ 25,604.32
Crypt (Double) Row 2 $ 32,272.12
Crypt (Double) Row 3 $ 32,272.12
Crypt (Double) Row 4 $ 25,604.32
Crypt (Double) Row 5 $ 18,936.53
Crypt (Double) Row 6 $ 17,602.97
Crypt (Double) Row 7 $ 17,602.97
Couch Crypt Row 1 $ 25,604.32
Couch Crypt Row 2 $ 32,272.12
Couch Crypt Row 3 $ 32,272.12
Couch Crypt Row 4 $ 25,604.32
Couch Crypt Row 5 $ 18,936.53
Couch Crypt Row 6 $ 17,602.97
Couch Crypt Row 7 $ 17,602.97
Place Ashes in Existing Crypt Interment Privilege $ 1,216.58 Niches
(Arbor View - Outdoor Niches)
Row 1 $ 3,467.24
Row 2 $ 5,067.50
Row 3 $ 5,334.22
Row 4 $ 5,334.22
(Faith)
Marble $ 1,608.04
V - 1
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
Small Glass - 11.5" L x 11" W x 6.5" H $ 3,015.05
Medium Glass - 11.5" L x 11" W x 14" H $ 5,829.13
Large Glass - 23.5" L x 11" W x 14" H $ 7,973.18
(Hope)
Marble $ 1,608.04
Small Glass - 11.5" L x 11" W x 6.5" H $ 3,015.05
Medium Glass - 11.5" L x 11" W x 14" H $ 5,829.13
Large Glass - 23.5" L x 11" W x 14" H $ 7,973.18
(Sanctuary of Devotion)
Large 26 inch (Outside View) Rows 3-5 $ 16,318.11
Large 26 inch (Outside View) Rows 6-8 $ 14,128.53
Large 23 inch $ 8,522.96
Large 20 inch (Outside View) $ 10,822.94
Corner $ 7,594.97
Medium Rows 1-6 $ 5,411.46
Medium Rows 7-8 $ 4,895.90
(Library of Living Memories)
Rows 1-8 $ 2,133.67
Row 9 $ 1,800.29
(Heavenly Gate)
Marble $ 2,144.04
Top Row $ 3,015.05
Medium Glass $ 5,829.13
Large Glass $ 7,973.18
Niches (Precious/Cherish)
Glass $ 2,133.67
Marble $ 1,800.29
Bayview (Newly developed cremation niche spaces 2011)
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Single (A,B,C,D,E,O)
Row 7 $ 3,333.88
Row 6 $ 5,334.22
Row 5 $ 5,600.92
Row 4 $ 5,867.64
Row 3 $ 5,867.64
Row 2 $ 5,600.92
Row 1 $ 4,000.66
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Wide Single (H,S,U)
Row 6 $ 8,001.34
Row 3 $ 8,801.47
Row 2 $ 8,401.41
Row 1 $ 6,001.00
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Double (L)
Row 6 $ 10,668.46
V - 2
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
Row 5 $ 11,201.87
Row 4 $ 11,735.30
Row 3 $ 11,735.30
Row 2 $ 11,201.87
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Double (M, Outside Glass
Row 6 $ 12,002.02
Row 5 $ 12,535.44
Row 4 $ 13,068.86
Row 3 $ 13,068.86
Row 2 $ 12,535.44
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Feature (R)
Row 4 $ 30,138.42
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Single (T) Outside Glass
Row 6 $ 6,001.00
Row 5 $ 6,267.70
Row 4 $ 6,534.42
Row 3 $ 6,534.42
Row 2 $ 6,267.70
Niches (Bay View Columbarium Entry) Feature (P)
Row 4 $ 22,937.21
Row 3 $ 22,937.21
Row 2 $ 22,937.21
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Feature (K)
Row 3 $ 41,873.75
(Bay View Columbarium Entry) Wide Single Angle Corner (G,H) Row 7 $ 5,267.53
Row 6 $ 8,268.06
Row 5 $ 8,668.12
Row 4 $ 9,068.19
Row 3 $ 9,068.19
Row 2 $ 8,668.12
Row 1 $ 6,267.70
(Bay View Columbarium Vault) (Elevations 4,9)
Row 7 $ 3,067.17
Row 6 $ 5,067.50
Row 5 $ 5,334.22
Row 4 $ 5,600.92
Row 3 $ 5,600.92
Row 2 $ 5,334.22
Row 1 $ 3,733.94
(Bay View Columbarium Vault) Wide Single (H)
Row 6 $ 7,734.62
V - 3
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
(Bay View Columbarium Vault) Double (L)
Row 6 $ 10,401.73
Row 2 $ 10,935.17
(Bay View Columbarium Vault) Feature (N)
Row 3 $ 41,607.04
(Bay View Columbarium Alcove) (Elevations 6,7,8) Single (B,D) Row 7 $ 2,800.46
Row 6 $ 4,800.78
Row 5 $ 5,067.50
Row 4 $ 5,334.22
Row 3 $ 5,334.22
Row 2 $ 5,067.50
Row 1 $ 3,467.24
(Bay View Columbarium Alcove) Wide Single (H)
Row 6 $ 7,467.91
Row 3 $ 8,268.06
Row 2 $ 7,867.98
(Bay View Columbarium Alcove) Double (L)
Row 5 $ 10,668.46
Row 4 $ 11,201.87
Row 3 $ 11,201.87
(Bay View Columbarium Alcove) Feature (R)
Row 4 $ 29,338.30
(Bay View Columbarium Alcove) Wide Single Inside Corner (G, Row 7 $ 4,734.12
Row 6 $ 7,734.62
Row 5 $ 8,134.70
Row 4 $ 8,534.76
Row 3 $ 8,534.76
Row 2 $ 8,134.70
(Bay View Columbarium Family Alcove) Single (F)
Row 5 $ 3,867.30
Row 1 $ 3,867.30
(Bay View Columbarium Family Alcove) Feature (Q)
Row 4 $ 24,137.41
Row 3 $ 24,137.41
Row 2 $ 24,137.41

ENDOWMENT CARE
V - 4
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
Endowment Care (All interment spaces, except green burial graves) 25% of the cost of the interment
space.

Endowment Care (Green burial graves) 35% of the cost of the interment
space.

CEMETERY MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES
Opening and Closing (Adult Grave) per casket $ 1,213.51 Opening and Closing (Crypt) per casket or urn $ 913.47
Opening and Closing (Niche) per urn $ 126.66
Opening and Closing (Cremation Grave) per urn $ 382.24
Opening and Closing (Infant Grave) per casket $ 382.24
Administrative $ 140.00
Witnessed Lowering $ 460.05
Graveside Set-up/Equip. $ 418.49
Cryptside Set-up/Equip. $ 357.82
Nicheside Set-Up/Equip. $ 303.24
Disinterment (Adult Grave) $ 1,666.93
Disinterment (Cremation Grave) $ 749.45
Disinterment (Infant Grave) $ 749.45
Disinterment (Crypt) $ 819.75
Disinterment (Niche) $ 66.66
Marker Installation (Adult Grave) $ 566.74
Marker Installation (Crypt) $ 186.68
Marker Installation (Niche) $ 126.66
Upright Monument Installation $ 1,133.50
Memorial Tablet Installation $ 2,267.03
Single Sandblasting for Crypt Front $ 466.73
Double Sandblasting for Crypt Front $ 600.09

MORTUARY CHARGES
Basic Services of Funeral Director and Staff $ 1,726.93 Embalming $ 676.03
Special Care of autopsied remains $ 250.01
Harvest repair $ 408.27
Pacemaker removal $ 66.66
Other preparation of the remains $ 324.03
Identification/viewing of un-embalmed remains (30-minutes) $ 231.97 Dressing and casketing of unembalmed remains $ 262.90
Refrigeration of remains $ 676.03
V - 5
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
Transfer of remains to funeral home (Residence removal or second attendant, add $95.00) (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile) $ 793.45
Funeral Coach (Hearse) 4 hours (Each additional hour charged at $150 per hour) (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile) $ 822.73
8 Pass Limo - 4 hours (Each additional hour charged at $150 per hour) (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile)
$ 912.43
10 Pass Limo - 4 hours (Each additional hour charged at $150 per hour) (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile)
$ 952.64
Flower Van - 4 hours (Each additional hour charged at $150 per hour) (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile)
$ 519.62
Additional livery charges to Riverside National Cemetery $ 200.01 Foreign Consulate office visit $ 400.05
Transfer of remains to place of autopsy and return to funeral home (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile)
$ 303.24
Delivery of casketed remains to residence for viewing (Beyond 30 miles, charged at $3.00 per mile)
$ 400.05
Use of staff for viewing $ 631.85
Use of staff for funeral ceremony $ 756.31
Use of staff for memorial service (no casket present) $ 677.02 Additional evening service $ 916.60
Use of equipment and Staff for graveside ceremony $ 521.51 Charge for any ceremony held on weekend $ 1,455.65
Re-filing of permit or affidavit preparation $ 200.01
Use of Audio Visual Equipment $ 545.86
Scattering at sea (unwitnessed) $ 197.02
Direct Cremation
This charge is for the cremation process wherein no services, ceremonies, or viewings will be held for the decedent. Also included is a minimum cremation container that meets crematory requirements. This charge does not include scattering at sea or other disposition of the cremated remains.
$ 1,600.25
Immediate Burial
This charge is for the immediate burial at the Woodlawn Cemetery or other cemetery within 30 miles of Woodlawn Cemetery wherein no services, ceremonies, or viewings will be held for the decedent. This charge does not include the price of a casket.
$ 3,042.18
V - 6
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit V - Public Works: Cemetery
Service Effective
7-1-22
Forwarding Remains to another funeral home.

This charge includes basic services of funeral director and staff, a proportionate share of overhead costs, transfer of remains to Woodlawn, securing and filing necessary certificates and permits, embalming or other preparation of remains, and delivery to Los Angeles International Airport (The permit, combo shipping unit or air
tray, additional services and casket are not included). $ 2,900.05
Receiving remains from another funeral home.

This charge includes basic services of funeral director and staff, a proportionate share of overhead costs, transfer of remains to Woodlawn, securing and filing necessary certificates and permits. (Additional services, casket, and other merchandise not included). $ 2,313.12
Infant Burial - Includes Non-Viewing Graveside Ceremony, basic services of funeral director and staff, transfer of remains to mortuary, embalming or refrigeration, dressing, cosmetics, and casketing, use of staff and/or equipment for graveside ceremony
(on-site).
$ 1,521.09

CEMETERY MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES
Temporary Marker Placement $ 91.10
Oversized marker/Upright Monument Removal Fee $ 278.04
Witness Marker Installation $ 139.02
Chapel Fee $ 620.57

MORTUARY CHARGES
Refrigeration of remains (beyond 21 days, charged an additional $22.54 per day)
$ 22.54
V - 7
*Please note that the changes for this exhibit are noted in Appendix 2.

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Exhibit W - Public Works: Airport
Service FY 2022-23
Fee Comments
Tie-Downs
Single-engine Space1 $123.67 Monthly
Multi-engine Space below 12,500 lbs.1 $185.52 Monthly
Transient Tie-Downs
Single-engine Space below 12,500 lbs. $19.35 Nightly
Multi-engine Space below 12,500 lbs. $38.71 Nightly
Multi-engine Space: Aircraft over 12,500 lbs.
$38.71
Plus $1.00 per one thousand
pounds over $12,500
Overnight Vehicular Parking (nightly) $12.89 Nightly
Overnight Vehicular Parking (monthly) $129.07 Monthly
Hangars (Land Value)
Light Aircraft Covers and 22T Hangar1 $3.63 Annually-per square foot Various Fees
Fuel Flowage Fee-Jet A Fuel (dispensed at SM Airport)2
$0.11 Gallon
Fuel Flowage Fee-AVGas Fuel (dispensed at SM
Airport)2 $0.11 Gallon
Airport Event Permit $614.54
Airport Billable Services Actual Cost Hourly
1 Charges are not subject to annual cost of living adjustment but may increase annually subject to lease agreements and/or periodic appraisals.
2 Fees are not subject to annual administrative revisions and increases, adjusted periodically based on appraisals.

W - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT X: Community Development - Office of Pier Management Number of Guests **35% Discount
1-99 $163
100-199 $228
200-299 $260
300-350 $293
East Deck – Half $42
East Deck – Full $65
Number of Guests
Up to 30
Up to 60
Up to 90 (expand area)
Additional half-hour
Rental per
Hour
$400
$300
Fee
$3
NOTES:
****Discount given to nonprofit and student groups. Only nonprofit groups with documented tax-exempt status shall be eligible for discount.
$100 $80
$1,000
Number of Guests Rental per Hour
1-99 $600
Semi-Private Event
Number of Guests Rental per Hour ***25% Discount
1-99 $75 $56
In addition to facility rental fee, a film permit is required. Carousel Operators must be hired at additional charge.

Santa Monica Pier Carousel Rental Rate Schedule FY2022-23 Private Events Held After Regular Operating Hours
Rental per Hour *20% Discount
$250 $200
$350 $280
$550
$25
Private Events Held During Regular Operating Hours
$400 $320
$450 $360
$65 $52
200-299 $900
300-350
100-199 $800
Pier Carousel
* Discount given to midweek and off-season parties.
** Discount given to midweek alcohol-free parties hosted by nonprofit groups. Only nonprofit groups with documented tax-exempt status shall be eligible for discount.

Description
Santa Monica Pier Carousel - Public Ride Fee (children 3 years of age and younger ride free with ticketed adult)
$250
$350
100-199 $100 $75
200-299 $125 $94
Rental Fees as of 7-1-22 - Per Resolution No. _____________ (CCS), fees in this exhibit are not subject to the annual administrative revision and increase.

Children's Party Specials (Semi-Private)
Flat Rate (three hours)
$5 per additional person
$5 per additional person
****35% Discount
$260
$195
Type
Commercial Film
Commercial Stills
Filming
*** Discount given to nonprofit groups and to mid-week parties. Only nonprofit groups with documented tax-exempt status shall be eligible for discount.

Carousel X - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP EXHIBIT Y - City Manager's Office: City TV
Rental/Equipment Use Hourly Rate
07/01/22 Area of Expertise Fee Effective
07/01/22
Permanent Staff
Truck Rental* $ 100.00 Producer $ 174.52
Studio Rental (inc. lighting)* $ 80.00 Production Engineer $ 174.52 Graphics* $ 50.00 Director $ 174.52
Green Screen* $ 50.00
Teleprompter* $ 50.00
Camera* $ 40.00 Field Producer $ 63.17
Jib* $ 30.00 Lighting Technician $ 48.10
Audio Mixer* $ 25.00 Production Technician $ 34.47
Video Switcher* $ 20.00 Audio Operator $ 29.22
City Staffing Varies1 Video Editor $ 29.22
Stage Manager $ 29.22
OTHER: Technical Director $ 29.22

1. Master DVD* $ 34.08 Camera Operator $ 29.22

2. Up to 9 additional DVD copies* $ 1.50 Graphics Operator $ 29.22
Administration Fee $ 161.52 Teleprompter Operator $ 29.22 Production Assistant $ 29.22
Video Intern $ 23.74
*Fees are not subject to the City's established annual administrative revision and increase.

NOTES:

CITY OF SANTA MONICA - CITYTV PRODUCTION SERVICES
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE, FY 2022-23

1. Staffing costs vary based on position and number of staff assigned. The staff assigned is dependent upon the type of services provided, type of equipment used, and staff availability. Only City staff may use City equipment.

2. A $166.53 flat rate Administration Fee will be charged for administrative services associated with each production, to be raised by the annual administrative increase.

3. Hourly rates for as-needed positions include benefits. Hourly rates for permanent positions are base salary only and do not include benefits, but are to be increased by COLA each July 1st.

9. Services provided by contractors will be charged based on the contracted rate, i.e.: Script Writer, Make-Up Artist, Advanced Motion Graphics Designer, Advanced Video Editing, On-Air Talent, Production Companies.

10. Charges for use of City TV services, equipment or facilities not listed shall be determined by the City Manager. Rates shall be based on the costs incurred in providing the services and facility or equipment costs shall be based on market conditions.

11. All non-City productions handled by CityTV must coincide with the mission of the Office of Communications, support the City's goals and objectives, and fit within the Division's workplan and budget.

As-Needed Staff*

4. The following costs will be waived, but tracked for reporting purposes for City Divisions, government entities, SMMUSD, SMC, and Santa Monica based non-profit organizations: City Equipment and Studio Costs, Administrative Fee, Producer Time.

5. Staffing costs will be waived for general fund City Department productions. Staffing costs for SMMUSD School Board meetings and Santa Monica based non-profit youth organizations with be discounted by 25%. Listed staffing costs apply to other non-City organizations and City enterprise funds. Overtime is charged at time and one half.

6. Studio Rental includes lighting, use of green room, and use of two small parking spaces.

7. Costs for DVDs will be waived for City Departments, but tracked for reporting purposes.

8. Direct costs for rental and delivery of non-City equipment, if any, will be charged, i.e. scaffolding.

Y - 1

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Master Fees Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT F
1 City Council Meeting: June 28, 2022 Santa Monica, California RESOLUTION NUMBER ____ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA

SETTING FORTH THE ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION SCHEDULE OF FINES FOR

CERTAIN VIOLATIONS OF THE SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE, SETTING

CIVIL PENALTIES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS AND FOR THE LATE PAYMENT OF

PENALTIES, SETTING FINES FOR POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSES

TO EXCESSIVE FALSE ALARMS, AND SETTING FINES FOR THE

SANTA MONICA PUBLIC LIBRARY

WHEREAS, Chapter 1.09 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code authorizes the imposition of fines for certain code violations through the issuance of administrative citations; and
WHEREAS, Section 1.09.040 states that the amount of fines for code violations imposed pursuant to Chapter 1.09 shall be set forth in a schedule of fines established by resolution of the City Council and that the fine schedule shall specify any increased fines for repeat violations of the same code provision by the same person within thirty-six (36) months from the date of an administrative citation and specify the amount of any late payment charges imposed for the payment of a fine after thirty (30) days from the date of issuance of the administrative citation; and
WHEREAS, effective code enforcement is vital to effectuating the City’s commitment to protecting its residents’, businesses’ and visitors’ health, safety, welfare, and quality of life; and

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT F
2 WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code and Chapter 3.02 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code authorize the City to establish by resolution a schedule of parking penalties for parking violations and for the late payment of such penalties; and WHEREAS, California law provides that such parking penalties are civil in nature and subject to administrative enforcement; and
WHEREAS, false alarms endanger public safety by diverting precious police resources and hampering response efforts to actual emergencies; and WHEREAS, Chapter 3.56 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code authorizes the imposition of a police false alarm response fine established by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, responses to false fire alarms negatively impact the overall safety of the community by diverting Fire Department resources from actual emergencies; and WHEREAS, Section 8.44.150 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code authorizes the imposition of a false fire alarm response fine to recover the Fire Department’s costs in responding to repetitive false alarms and provides that such fine shall be set by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, library fines ensure that library materials and equipment are returned so that libraries can serve their primary purpose; and
WHEREAS, the Santa Monica Pier (“Pier”) is a wooden structure with limited entrances and exits; and
WHEREAS, the use of combustible fuels of any type on or near the Pier poses a risk to public safety; and
WHEREAS, to protect the health and safety of the public on the Pier, Santa

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT F
3 Monica Municipal Code section 3.36.290 prohibits the use and possession of combustible fuels on or near the Pier without a permit; and WHEREAS, Chapter 6.40 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code establishes an Outdoor Pilot Program that authorizes outdoor dining and other business activities in designated outdoor areas; and
WHEREAS, on July 29, 2021, the City established administrative regulations relating to the Outdoor Pilot Program pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code section

6.40.040; and
WHEREAS, Santa Monica Municipal Code section 6.40.080 authorizes fines up to $250 for violating the Outdoor Pilot Program administrative regulations; and WHEREAS, increasing the fines for violating the Outdoor Pilot Program administrative regulations will deter noncompliance; and WHEREAS, most recently, on February 8, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 11401 (CCS) (“Resolution 11401”), which updated the consolidated master fine schedule to eliminate certain overdue fines for adult cardholders and to establish new non-standard fines for violations of the Second Shared Mobility Pilot Program Administrative Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the City now desires to amend and restate its consolidated master fine schedule to establish a new non-standard fine for violating the combustible fuel prohibitions in Santa Monica Municipal Code section 3.36.290, to establish a new nonstandard fine for violating the Outdoor Pilot Program administrative regulations issued pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code section 6.40.040; and to reflect changes in the California Fire Code.

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT F
4 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. STANDARD FINE: Except as otherwise specifically set forth below in Section 4, the administrative citation fine amount imposed pursuant to Chapter 1.09 to the Municipal Code (“administrative citation fine amount”), for a first violation of the Santa Monica Municipal Code by a person shall be Seventy-Five Dollars ($75.00).

SECTION 2. REPEAT VIOLATIONS: The administrative citation fine amount for a second violation of the same Municipal Code provision by the same responsible party within thirty-six (36) months from the date of an administrative citation shall equal one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the fine amount listed in this Resolution for a first violation of that Municipal Code section at the time of the second violation. The administrative citation fine amount for a third and any subsequent violation of the same Municipal Code provision by the same responsible party within thirty-six (36) months from the date of an administrative citation shall equal one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the fine amount listed in this Resolution for a first violation of that Municipal Code section at the time of the third, or as applicable, subsequent violation.

SECTION 3. LATE PAYMENT CHARGES: Payment of the administrative citation fine amount after thirty (30) days from the date of the administrative citation shall be subject to an additional late payment charge. The late payment charge shall equal ten percent (10%) of the administrative citation fine amount due to the City, or ten percent (10%) of the amount remaining unpaid to the City if a portion of the fine amount was timely paid. Late payment charges shall be in addition to the amount of the administrative

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT F
5 citation fine amount. In addition, interest shall accrue on all unpaid monies due, exclusive of late payment charges, at the rate of one half of one percent per month of the total amount due from the date the administrative citation fine amount becomes delinquent until the date that all delinquent amounts are paid to the City.

SECTION 4. NON-STANDARD FINES: The specific administrative citation fine amounts applicable to first violations of each associated Santa Monica Municipal Code section or its successor legislation, or rule or regulation, are hereby established as set forth in the attached Exhibits 1 and 2 for any first violation.

SECTION 5. The Schedule of Civil Penalties for Parking Violations and for Late Payments are hereby established as set forth in the attached Exhibit 3.

SECTION 6. The penalties listed in Exhibit 3 for a Santa Monica Municipal Code or California Vehicle Code section shall apply to all unlisted subsections, prohibiting the same violations.

SECTION 7. The fines for the second, third and fourth Police Department responses to a false alarm within the same fiscal year are hereby established as set forth in the attached Exhibit 4.

SECTION 8. A false fire alarm response fine for the third and subsequent response by the Fire Department to a false alarm at the same location during a fiscal year for purposes of recovering costs associated with resources and services provided by the Santa Monica Fire Department in connection with responses to excessive false fire alarms is hereby established as set forth in the attached Exhibit 4.

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT F
6 SECTION 9. Library fines are hereby established as set forth in the attached Exhibit 5.

SECTION 10. All fines established by this Resolution shall become effective July 1, 2022.

SECTION 11. Resolution 11401 is hereby repealed in its entirety.

SECTION 12. If there are any conflicts between the fines adopted in this Resolution and the fines adopted in any prior Resolution or schedule, the fines adopted pursuant to this Resolution shall control.

SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and the same shall be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
DOUGLAS T. SLOAN
City Attorney
Exhibit 1: Administrative Citation Fine Schedule
Exhibit 2: Administrative Citation Schedule of Fines for Violations of Taxicab Rules and Regulations
Exhibit 3: Schedule of Civil Penalties for Parking Violations and for Late Payments Exhibit 4: False Alarm Fine Schedule
Exhibit 5: Library Fine Schedule

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Code Section Violation Description(s) Fine
SMMC 3.21.040 (a) Dockless mobility prohibited activities - Operate, install, or make available for rent unauthorized dockless mobility devices without Shared Mobility Device Operator Permit $500 SMMC 3.21.040(b) Dockless mobility prohibited activities - Operate, install, or make available for rent unauthorized dockless mobility devices in excess of Shared Mobility Device Operator Permit $500 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class A - One time default fine no escalation $75 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class B - One time no escalation $100 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class C - Repeat violation escalation - 1st Violation $100 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class C - Repeat violation escalation - 2nd Violation $250 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class C - Repeat violation escalation - 3rd Violation $500 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class D - One time no escalation $250 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class E - One time no escalation $500 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class F - Repeat violation escalation - 1st Violation $500 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class F - Repeat violation escalation - 2nd Violation $750 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class F - Repeat violation escalation - 3rd Violation $1,000 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class G - Repeat violation escalation - 1st Violation $0 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class G - Repeat violation escalation - 2nd Violation $0 SMMC 3.22.025, 3.22.110 Shared Mobility Class G - Repeat violation escalation - 3rd Violation $500 SMMC 3.36.290 Prohibition on use or possession of combustible fuels in and around pier $500 SMMC 4.04.070 Permit required to keep certain animals $500 SMMC 4.04.080 Restrictions on keeping horses, mules, burros, or jacks $100 SMMC 4.04.090 Fowls, maximum number permitted $100
SMMC 4.04.100 Permit required to keep hogs, bulls, or billy goats $100 SMMC 4.04.110 Restrictions on keeping cow or goats $100 SMMC 4.04.120 Staking certain unfenced animals prohibited $100 SMMC 4.04.130 Keeping bees prohibited $100
SMMC 4.04.140 Conditional permit requirements for certain animals $100 SMMC 4.04.150 Animals at-large $100
SMMC 4.04.160 Dogs prohibited on schools, beaches and parks $100 SMMC 4.04.170 Licensing of dogs required $100
SMMC 4.04.200 Dog kennels, business license required $500 SMMC 4.04.210 Non-residents, dog license requirements $100 SMMC 4.04.230 Found animals, duty to surrender $100
SMMC 4.04.270 Sufficient sustenance and shelter required $150 SMMC 4.04.290 Quarantined animal, containment required $1,000 SMMC 4.04.300 Dogs, rabies vaccine required $250
SMMC 4.04.330 Veterinarians, duties of persons vaccinating dogs $250 SMMC 4.04.340 Dogs, rabies tag required $100
SMMC 4.04.350 Imported dogs, regulations $100
F&AG 30503 Impounded dogs, unspayed/unneutered (pass through to State) $40 SMMC 4.04.360 Impounded dogs, proof of rabies required $100 SMMC 4.04.370 Dogs, public nuisance/fecal matter $100
SMMC 4.04.385 Dogs in public, duty of person to possess clean-up materials $100 SMMC 4.04.410 Vicious dogs, restrictions $1,000
SMMC 4.08.270 Restrictions on leaf blower operation $500 SMMC 4.12.060 Exterior Noise Standards $500
SMMC 4.12.070 Excessive Vibration $500
SMMC 4.12.090 Noisy Animals $250
SMMC 4.12.100 Public parks, beaches or recreational facilities restrictions $250 SMMC 4.12.110 Demolition, excavation, grading, spray painting, construction, maintenance or repair of building activity-hours & noise limits $500
SMMC 4.12.120 Failure to Post Construction Hours Sign $250 SMMC 4.12.150 Business Support Operations $250
SMMC 4.12.160 Interference with Enforcement $500
SMMC 4.12.180 Gardening/Landscaping Activities-Hours of Operation $250 SMMC 4.27.010 Disruption of housing services $500
SMMC 4.27.030 Tenant Evictions for Owner Occupancy $1,000 SMMC 4.27.040 Occupancy Permits $1,000
SMMC 4.36.100 Temporary Relocation Assistance $250
SMMC 4.44.010 Smoking in Elevator or Public Restroom $500 SMMC 4.44.020 Smoking in public places, work places, and restaurants $500 SMMC 4.44.030 Sale of tobacco by vending machine or out of package $750 SMMC 4.56.020 Prohibition - Tenant Harassment $1,000
SMMC 4.56.050 Buyout Offers and Agreements - Tenant Harassment $1,000 SMMC 4.62.015 (a-e) Minimum Wage Payment $500
SMMC 4.62.015 (f) Minimum Wage Bulletin $100
SMMC 4.62.015 (g) Minimum Wage Record Keeping $500
SMMC 4.62.025 Paid Sick Leave $500
Exhibit 1 - Administrative Citation Fine Schedule
Administrative Citation Fines F1 - 1

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Code Section Violation Description(s) Fine
SMMC 4.62.040 Service Charges $500
SMMC 4.62.060 Unlawful Practices $500
SMMC 4.62.070 Retaliation $1,000
SMMC 4.62.100 Compliance with Enforcement $1,000
SMMC 4.63.015 Hotel Worker Minimum Wage Payment $500
SMMC 4.63.025 Paid Sick Leave $500
SMMC 4.63.040 Service Charges $500
SMMC 4.63.060 Unlawful Practices $500
SMMC 4.63.070 Retaliation $1,000
SMMC 4.63.100 Compliance with Enforcement $1,000
SMMC 4.68.040 Failure to Obtain Community Events Permit $250 SMMC 5.04.240 Dogs, Cats or Animals in Eating Places $100 SMMC 5.08.060 Unapproved Use of Privy (Port-a-potty) $100 SMMC 5.08.070 Failure to Clean Adjacent Sidewalk $250
SMMC 5.08.080 Failure to Maintain Clean Premises $500
SMMC 5.08.090 Failure to Properly Store Fertilizer $100 SMMC 5.08.100 Excessive manure/fertilizer as defined Near Residential $250 SMMC 5.08.110 Offensive Substance on Public Property $500 SMMC 5.08.140 Removal/Destruction of Building Officer's Posted Notice $500 SMMC 5.08.170 Unauthorized Refuse Containers in the Public Way $250 SMMC 5.08.330 Obstruction of Water Meter/Gate Valves $250 SMMC 5.08.340 Unauthorized Private Dumping Ground $500
SMMC 5.08.370 Failure to Comply with County Health Department Standards $500 SMMC 5.08.380 Refuse Collection During Prohibited Hours $250 SMMC 5.20.040 Prohibited Discharge Standards $1,000
SMMC 5.20.050 Specific Pollutant Limitations $1,000
SMMC 5.20.070 Pretreatment Facilities $1,000
SMMC 5.20.080 Additional Pretreatment Measures $1,000
SMMC 5.20.090 Spill Prevention Plans $1,000
SMMC 5.20.100 Good Housekeeping Provision $1,000
SMMC 5.20.110 Requirements for Restaurants and other Commercial Cooking $1,000 SMMC 5.20.310 Periodic Compliance Reports $1,000
SMMC 5.20.320 Report of Changed Conditions $1,000
SMMC 5.20.330 Reports of Potential Problems/Slug control Plans $1,000 SMMC 5.20.370 Monitoring and Sampling Pre-notification $1,000 SMMC 5.20.390 Sample Collection $1,000
SMMC 5.20.400 Analytical Requirements $1,000
SMMC 5.20.420 Falsifying Information $1,000
SMMC 5.20.430 Inspection and Sampling $1,000
SMMC 5.20.440 Monitoring Facilities $1,000
SMMC 6.04.020 Operating Business without Proper City License $500 SMMC 6.04.270 Failure to Post Business License $250
SMMC 6.14.060 Service Business Activities Requiring Police Permits $500 SMMC 6.28.030 Newsrack-Operating and Maintenance Requirements $250 SMMC 6.28.030 Newsrack Without Permit $500
SMMC 6.28.040 Newsrack-Maintenance and Installation Standards $250 SMMC 6.28.050 Newsrack-Standards for Materials Sold $500 SMMC 6.32.070 Soliciting Trade on Sidewalk $500
SMMC 6.46.020 Failure to Obtain Permit for Liquidation Sale $500 SMMC 6.46.100 Liquidation Sale-Failure to Post Permit $250 SMMC 6.48.030 Vehicle for Hire-Business license required $500 SMMC 6.48.040 Vehicle for Hire–Compulsory Insurance Coverage $1,000 SMMC 6.48.050 Vehicle for Hire–Driving of Vehicles $250 SMMC 6.48.060 Vehicle for Hire-Direct Route $500
SMMC 6.48.065 Vehicle for Hire - Compensation for Access to Passengers $500 SMMC 6.49.040 Taxicab Franchise - Suspension or Revocation $1,000 SMMC 6.49.060(a) Taxicab Franchise Fees - Annual Franchise Fee $1,000 SMMC 6.49.060(b) Taxicab Franchise Fees - Annual Taxicab Vehicle Permit Fee $1,000 SMMC 6.49.060(c) Taxicab Franchise Fees - Annual Taxicab Driver's Permit Fee $1,000 SMMC 6.49.070 Taxicab Franchise - Signage $500
SMMC 6.49.080 Taxicabs -Taxicabs Identification Decal Required $5,000 SMMC 6.49.090 Taximeters and Rates $250
SMMC 6.49.100 Parking of Vehicles - Stands $250
SMMC 6.49.110 Taxicab Identification and Vehicle Operating Requirements $500 SMMC 6.49.120 Taxicabs-Full Use of Taxicab $500
SMMC 6.49.130 Access to passengers on business establishment premises; exclusive arrangements limited $500 SMMC 6.49.140(a) Unauthorized taxicab services prohibited; exception $5,000 SMMC 6.49.140(c)-(e) Unauthorized taxicab services prohibited; exception $1,000 SMMC 6.49.150 Rules and regulations $1,000
SMMC 6.116.040 Unauthorized Display on Municipal Pier $250 Administrative Citation Fines F1 - 2

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Code Section Violation Description(s) Fine
SMMC 6.120.030 Valet Parking without Permit $500
SMMC 6.120.060 Valet Parking-Operating Requirements $250 SMMC 6.120.070 Valet Parking- Penalties $250
SMMC 6.120.090 Valet Parking: Insurance Requirements $250 SMMC 6.120.110 Valet Parking-Regulations $250
SMMC 6.120.120 Authorized Valet Parking Zones $250
SMMC 6.120.130 Valet Parking: Conformance with Applicable Laws $250 SMMC 6.120.140 Valet Parking-Conditions Imposed on Permit $250 SMMC 6.120.150 Valet Parking-Requirements for Downtown Valets $250 SMMC 6.20.030 Advertising, Facilitating, or Operating a Vacation Rental $1,000 SMMC 6.200.030 Failure to comply with commercial cannabis administrative regulations $1,000 SMMC 6.200.040 Failure to comply with commercial cannabis permit conditions $1,000 SMMC 6.200.060 Insurance requirements $1,000
SMMC 6.200.070 Conformance with applicable laws $1,000
SMMC 6.201.010 Permit Required (Retail) $1,000
SMMC 6.202.010 Permit Required (Light Manufacturing) $1,000 SMMC 6.203.010 Nonmedicinal Cannabis Uses Prohibited $1,000 SMMC 6.22.040 Failure to Comply with Residential Leasing Requirements $1,000 SMMC 6.22.050 Failure to Comply with Residential Leasing Requirements $1,000 SMMC 6.22.060 Failure to Comply with Residential Leasing Requirements $1,000 SMMC 6.22.070 Failure to Comply with Residential Leasing Requirements $1,000 SMMC 6.22.080 Failure to Comply with Residential Leasing Requirements $1,000 SMMC 6.22.090 Failure to Comply with Residential Leasing Requirements $1,000 SMMC 6.36.030 Vendor Permit Required: First Violation $250 SMMC 6.36.030 Vendor Permit Required: Second Violation within one year of the first violation. $500 SMMC 6.36.030 Vendor Permit Required: Each additional violation within one year of the first violation. $1,000 SMMC 6.36.040 Restricted Vending Time and Locations - First Violation $100 SMMC 6.36.040 Restricted Vending Time and Locations - Second Violation $200 SMMC 6.36.040 Restricted Vending Time and Locations - Each Additional Violation (after first and second violations) $500
SMMC 6.36.050 Vending Requirements and Prohibitions - First Violation $100 SMMC 6.36.050 Vending Requirements and Prohibitions - Second Violation $200 SMMC 6.36.050 Vending Requirements and Prohibitions - Each Additional Violation (after first and second violations) $500
SMMC 6.36.110 Failure to comply with sidewalk vending regulations - First Violation $100 SMMC 6.36.110 Failure to comply with sidewalk vending regulations - Second Violation $200 SMMC 6.36.110 Failure to comply with sidewalk vending regulations - Third Violation $500 SMMC 6.36.110 Failure to comply with vehicle vending regulations - First Violation $250 SMMC 6.40.040 Failure to Comply with Outdoor Pilot Program Administrative Regulations $250 SMMC 7.04.210 Regulations for Resurfacing Work in Public Way $250 SMMC 7.04.230 Excavation in Public Way-Vehicle Crossing $250 SMMC 7.04.240 Excavation in the Public Way-Per Plat/Application $250 SMMC 7.04.240 Excavation in the Public Way-Due Diligence $500 SMMC 7.04.490 Connection of Sewer Without Permit $500
SMMC 7.04.650 Sewage from Vehicle into Sewer System Without Permit $500 SMMC 7.04.670 Materials/Equipment in Public Way Without Permit $500 SMMC 7.04.700 Revocation of Permits-Work to Cease $1,000 SMMC 7.04.710 Failure to Remove Materials/Equipment in Public Way $500 SMMC 7.04.720 Illumination of Building Materials Stored in Public Way $250 SMMC 7.04.730 Regulations for Building Material Deposits and Cranes $250 SMMC 7.04.740 Mixing/Storing Cementitious Materials On/Near Street $250 SMMC 7.04.750 Failure to Post Street Use Permit $250
SMMC 7.04.760 Construction Debris in Public Way $500
SMMC 7.06.050 Permit Required - Work in the Public Right-of Way $500 SMMC 7.06.330 Excavation Requirements $500
SMMC 7.06.340 Construction Requirements $250
SMMC 7.10.080 Urban Runoff Pollution Control Practices-All Properties $500 SMMC 7.10.090 Urban Runoff Reduction Requirements $500
SMMC 7.10.100 Urban Runoff Requirements for Construction Sites $500 SMMC 7.12.060 Temporary Water Service Without Permit. $500 SMMC 7.12.090 Additional Best Management Practices $500 SMMC 7.12.350 Unauthorized Use of City Water $500
SMMC 7.16.020 Excessive Water Use $250
SMMC 7.18.090 Violation of Plumbing Code Standards $500 SMMC 7.36.020 Moving Building/Structure on City Street Without Permit $500 SMMC 7.40.110 Planting of Tree in Parkway Without Permit $300 SMMC 7.40.110 Trim or Prune City Tree without Permit $500 SMMC 7.40.110 Injure/Interfere With City Tree-No Replacement Required $500 SMMC 7.40.110 Removal of City Tree without Permit $1,000 SMMC 7.40.110 Injure/Interfere With City Tree-Replacement Required $1,000 SMMC 7.40.130 Interference with City Tree Administration $500 Administrative Citation Fines F1 - 3

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Code Section Violation Description(s) Fine
SMMC 7.40.140 Intentional Damage to City Tree $1,000
SMMC 7.40.150 Unauthorized Attachment to City Tree $100 SMMC 7.40.160 Protection of Trees During Construction/Demolition $500 SMMC 7.44.020 Maintain Premises Free of Weeds $250
SMMC 7.48.020 Litter in Public Places $250
SMMC 7.48.040 Sweeping litter into gutters $250
SMMC 7.48.050 Property Owner to Keep Adjacent Public Way Free of Litter $250 SMMC 7.48.060 Litter on Private Property $250
SMMC 7.48.070 Owner to Maintain Premises Free of Litter $250 SMMC 8.04.010 Failure to Maintain-Technical Codes $500
SMMC 8.08.030 Continuing Use after Order to Discontinue Use $1,000 SMMC 8.08.050 Construction Work Without Permit $500
SMMC 8.08.070 Construction Work with Expired Permit $500 SMMC 8.08.110 Installation of Work from Unapproved Fabricator $500 SMMC 8.08.130 Occupancy Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy/ Final Inspection Approval $500 SMMC 8.08.160 Connection to Utilities Without Approval $500 SMMC 8.08.160 Reconnecting Utilities after Order to Disconnect $1,000 SMMC 8.08.170 Sandblasting Regulations-General $500
SMMC 8.08.170 Sandblasting-Failure to Give Three (3) Day Notice $750 SMMC 8.08.190 Violation of Temporary Trailer Regulations $500 SMMC 8.12.090 Failure to Provide Special Inspection as Required $1,000 SMMC 8.12.090 Failure to Provide Structural Observation as Required $1,000 SMMC 8.12.150 Maintaining Pool/Spa/Fountain Water Clarity $250 SMMC 8.40.020 Fireworks Prohibited $1,000
SMMC 8.44.050 Automatic Fire Sprinklers Required $500
SMMC 8.08.200 Failure to Brace Water Heater $500
SMMC 8.96.030 Responsibility for Maintenance-Public Nuisances $1,000 SMMC 8.100.010 Construction Means and Methods Plan Required $500 SMMC 8.100.060 Compliance with Means and Methods Plan $500 SMMC 8.100.040 Failure to Provide Construction Notice to Residential Tenant $500 SMMC 8.108.100 Landscape and Irrigation Requirements $250 SMMC 9.21.050 Over Height Hedge wall or fence, Encroaching hedges $250 SMMC 9.21.180 Hazardous Visual Obstructions $500
SMMC 9.21.130 Refuse and Recycling Storage Areas $250
SMMC 9.21.080 Outdoor Commercial Lighting Standards $250 SMMC 9.21.080 Glare Beyond Property $250
SMMC 9.21.100 Storage in Required Front/Side Yard or Vacant Lot $500 SMMC 9.27.080 Illegal Nonconforming Occupancy/Use $1,000 SMMC 9.28.030 Maintain Use of Required Off-street Parking Space $250 SMMC 9.28.080 Maintain Existing Loading Space $250
SMMC 9.28.120 Storage in Parking Space $250
SMMC 9.28.120 Marking of Parking Spaces $250
SMMC 9.28.120 Wheel Stops $250
SMMC 9.28.140 Number of Bicycle Spaces Required $250
SMMC 9.28.150 Number of Vanpool, Carpool Spaces Required $250 SMMC 9.29.040 Residential Building Record-Failure to Deliver to Buyer $500 SMMC 9.31.060 Auto Repair-Open Door for Noise/Body& Fender $500 SMMC 9.31.060 Auto Repair-Outdoor Repair Work $1,000
SMMC 9.31.060 Auto Repair-Operating Hours $1,000
SMMC 9.31.060 Auto Repair- Litter $500
SMMC 9.31.060 Auto Repair-Sound $250
SMMC 9.31.060 Auto Repair-Onsite Storage of Vehicles Awaiting Repair $500 SMMC 9.31.060 Auto Repair-Test Driving on Unapproved Streets $500 SMMC 9.31.060 Auto Repair-Vehicles Awaiting Repair $500 SMMC 9.31.060 Auto Dealership-Vehicles Awaiting Repair in Street/Alley $500 SMMC 9.31.070 Auto Dealership-Parking and Vehicle Storage $250 SMMC 9.31.070 Auto Dealership-Failure to Control Noise $250 SMMC 9.31.070 Auto Dealership-Test Driving on Unapproved Streets $500 SMMC 9.31.070 Auto Dealership-Loading And Unloading of Vehicles $1,000 SMMC 9.31.070 Auto Dealership-Hours of Operation Near Residential District $1,000 SMMC 9.31.070 Auto Rental- Parking and Vehicle Storage $250 SMMC 9.31.070 Auto Rental-Failure to Control Noise $250 SMMC 9.31.070 Auto Rental-Loading and Unloading Vehicles $1,000 SMMC 9.31.070 Auto Dealership-Vehicles Awaiting Repair $500 SMMC 9.31.070 Automobile Rental-Failure to Control Noise $250 SMMC 9.31.070 Automobile Rental-Loading and Unloading Vehicles $1,000 SMMC 9.31.080 Auto Wash-Vehicles in Public Way $500
SMMC 9.31.080 Auto Wash-Hours of Operation Near Residential $1,000 SMMC 9.31.150 Neighborhood Grocery Store-Delivery Hours $1,000 SMMC 9.31.185 Failure to comply with medical cannabis zoning regulations $1,000 SMMC 9.31.200 Unapproved sidewalk café in RVC district $500 Administrative Citation Fines F1 - 4

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Code Section Violation Description(s) Fine
SMMC 9.31.200 Unapproved sidewalk café in BCD district $500 SMMC 9.31.200 Unapproved sidewalk café in BSC, BSC3, BSC4 district $500 SMMC 9.31.200 Unapproved sidewalk café in C2 district $500 SMMC 9.31.200 Unapproved sidewalk café in C3 district $500 SMMC 9.31.200 Unapproved sidewalk café in C3C district $500 SMMC 9.31.200 Unapproved sidewalk café in C4 district $500 SMMC 9.31.200 Unapproved sidewalk café in C6 district $500 SMMC 9.31.200 Unapproved sidewalk café in CM district $500 SMMC 9.31.200 Unapproved sidewalk cafe in CP district $500 SMMC 9.31.220 Unpermitted Outdoor Uses $500
SMMC 9.31.210 Outdoor Newsstands-Zoning Regulations $250 SMMC 9.31.250 Private Tennis Courts-Lighting $250
SMMC 9.31.280 Restaurant-Hours of Operation Near Residential $1,000 SMMC 9.31.310 Senior Group Housing-Lighting $250
SMMC 9.31.320 Service Station-Vehicle for Repair in Street/Alley $500 SMMC 9.31.340 Game Arcades Bicycle Racks $250
SMMC 9.31.360 Outdoor Antique Markets $250
SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the R-1 District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the R2R District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the R-2 District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the R-3 District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the R-4 District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the R-MH District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the OP-1 District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the OP-Duplex District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the OP-2 District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the OP-3 District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the OP-4 District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the R2B District $100 SMMC 9.31.370 Excessive Yard Sales in the R3R District $100 SMMC 9.48.010 Conditions of Approval for Permits/Approvals for Land Use $500 SMMC 9.53.070 Contents of Worksite Transportation Plans $5/employee/day SMMC 9.53.080 Submission of Emission Reduction Plans and Worksite Transportation Plans $5/employee/day SMMC 9.53.090 Employer Monitoring and Enforcement $5/employee/day SMMC 9.53.140 Developer Monitoring and Remedies for Violation $5/residential unit/day
and $5/employee
in the project/day
SMMC 9.61.180 Prohibited Signs $250
SMMC 9.61.230 Sign On Street, Alley or Public Place $250 SMMC 9.61.240 Failure to Remove Prohibited Nonconforming Sign $1,000 CFC 104.11.2 Obstructing Fire Department Operations $1,000 CFC 105.1.1 Permits(s) Required $250
CFC 105.3.3 Occupancy prohibited before approval $1,000 CFC 105.3.5 Posting Permit $125
CFC 105.4.6 One set of approved plans kept on the site of the building or work during which the work authorized is in progress. $125
CFC 105.6.16(5) Permit (remove fuel by means other than dispensing) $250 CFC 105.6.16(7) Permit (place temporarily out of service) $250 CFC 105.6.16(8) Permit (change contents of tank) $250
CFC 105.6.37 Permit Required to Operate a Place of Public Assembly $500 CFC 105.7.13 Hazardous materials construction permit $500 CFC 106.3 Work commencing before permit issuance $1,000 CFC 107.2.2 Work shall not be done beyond the point indicated without approval $500 CFC 108.1 Maintenance of safeguards $125
CFC 108.2 Testing and operation of equipment $125
CFC 108.3 Availability of test and inspection records to Fire Dept. $125 CFC 108.6 Overcrowding-Exceed Maximum Occupant Load $1,000 CFC 110.1 Unlawful Acts $500
CFC 110.3.2 Compliance with Orders and Notices $500
CFC 110.3.4 Removal/Destruction of Sign/Tag $250
CFC 111.1 Unsafe Building $500
CFC 111.1.1 Unsafe Conditions $500
CFC 111.2 Stopping Use, Evacuation $500
CFC 112.1 Stop Order $250
CFC 112.1 Stop Order-Failure to Comply $1,000
CFC 112.4 Continue to work after Stop Work Order $1,000 CFC 301.1 Clothes Dryer Free of Lint $250
CFC 303.2 Fire Protection for Asphalt Kettles $250
CFC 304.1 Combustible Waste Material Accumulation Creating a Fire Hazard $125 CFC 304.1.2 Combustible Vegetation $125
The following code sections are from the California Fire Code (CFC), Title 19 of the California Code of Regulation (T19) and the California Building Administrative Citation Fines F1 - 5

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Code Section Violation Description(s) Fine
CFC 304.3 Location of Rubbish Dumpsters $125
CFC 305.1 Clearance from Ignition Sources $125
CFC 305.2 Hot Ashes and Spontaneous Ignition Sources $500 CFC 305.4 Deliberate or Negligent Burning $500
CFC 307.1 Prohibited Open Burning $500
CFC 308.1 Open/Illegal Burning $500
CFC 308.1.4 Charcoal burners and other open flame cooking devices shall not be operated on combustible balconies or within 10' of combustible storage $250
CFC 308.1.6.3 Sky Lanterns $500
CFC 308.1.8 Improper Use of Flaming Food/Beverage $250
CFC 308.2 Candles/Open flame Prohibited without permit $250 CFC 308.3.1 Improper Use of Candle/Open Flame $250
CFC 310.3 No Smoking Signs Posted and Enforced $75
CFC 311.1 Maintain Vacant Building/Property $1,000
CFC 311.2 Safeguarding Vacant Premises $500
CFC 311.3 Combustible/Hazardous Material in Vacant Building $1,000 CFC 315.3 Store Combustible Storage in Orderly Manner $125 CFC 315.3 Provide Clearance Of Heat Producing Appliances and Combustible Materials (keep area lint free) $125
CFC 315.3.1 Required Ceiling Clearance $125
CFC 315.3.2 Combustibles Stored in Exit $250
CFC 315.3.3 Combustible Material in Elec/Mech/Boiler Room $125 CFC 315.3.4 Storage Combustible Materials in Attic or Under floor $125 CFC 315.4 Storage Combustible Materials Outside of Building $125 CFC 401.3 Failure to Report Emergency $500
CFC 401.5 Report False Alarm $500
CFC 404.6 Egress Plan Posted $75
CFC 405.1 Emergency Plans/Fire Drills $125
CFC 405.2 Fire Drills Required $125
CFC 503.4 Obstruct Fire Access Road/Lane $125
CFC 504.1 Maintain Required Access to Building $250
CFC 504.2 Maintain Exterior Doors/Openings $250
CFC 505.1 Premises Identification Required $75
CFC 506.1 Provide Knox Box $75
CFC 506.2 Key Box Maintenance / Key Inventory $75
CFC 507.5.4 Obstruction of Hydrant/Fire Protection Equipment $250 CFC 509.1 Provide Identification Sign On Room/Door $125 CFC 509.1 Fire protection equipment shall be identified in an approved manner $125 CFC 509.2 Approved access shall be provided and maintained for all fire protection equipment $125 CFC 510.6 Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System Maintenance $500 CFC 603.4.2 Portable outdoor gas fire heating appliances $250 CFC 603.5.2 Maintain Heating Equipment/Appliance $125
CFC 603.8.2 Spark Arrestor Required $250
CFC 603.9 Protect Gas Meters/Piping $250
CFC 604.1 Abate Electrical Hazard $125
CFC 604.3 Provide working space and clearance in front of electrical service equipment $125 CFC 604.3.1 Label Electrical Room/Switchboard/Panel $75 CFC 604.4 Provide Listed Power Tap With Over-current Protection $75 CFC 604.4.3 Improper Use/Power Taps $75
CFC 604.5 Extension Cords Prohibited $125
CFC 604.5 Improper Use of Extension Cords $75
CFC 604.10.2 Portable, electric space heaters shall be plugged directly into an approved receptacle $125 CFC 604.10.4 Portable, electric space heaters shall not be operated within 3 feet of any combustible materials. $125
CFC 605.5 Access to Refrigeration Systems $125
CFC 605.8 Failure to have refrigerant detector $500
CFC 607.2 Commercial Kitchen Exhaust Hood Required $500 CFC 607.3.3 Hoods, Grease-Removal Devices, Fans, Ducts, Etc. shall be Cleaned at Req'd Intervals $250 CFC 703.1 Maintain Fire Resistive Construction $250
CFC 705.2 Maintain Fire Assemblies/Doors $500
CFC 705.2 Obstruction of Fire Assembly/Door $500
CFC 705.2.6 Test Fire Doors $125
CFC 704.2 Protection of Floor Openings $250
CFC 806.1.1 Natural cut trees shall be restricted in specific occupancies. $125 CFC 807.1 Maintain Flame Resistant Treatment $250
CFC 901.6 Maintain Fire Protection System/Appliance $1,000 CFC 901.7 Fire Watch Required-Problematic Systems $500
CFC 901.8 Tamper with Fire Department Equipment $1,000
CFC 901.8 Tamper with Fire Hydrant/Appliance $1,000
CFC 901.8.1 Tamper with Barriers/Locks/Signs/Seals $1,000 CFC 903.2 Fire Sprinkler System Required $1,000
Administrative Citation Fines F1 - 6

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Code Section Violation Description(s) Fine
CFC 903.2.11.6 Additional Fire Suppression System Required $1,000 CFC 904.12 Hood Fire Extinguishing System Required to Protect all Areas $1,000 777 906.4 Provide a Type K Fire Extinguisher $75
CFC 904.12.5 Kitchen Hood Extinguishing System Service $250 CFC 906.1 Provide Fire Extinguisher Based on Use/Hazard/Occupancy $75 CFC 906.2 Maintenance and Required Service Intervals for Fire Extinguishers $75 CFC 906.3 Fire Extinguisher Size and Distribution $75
CFC 906.6 Post Signs Indicating Location of Fire Extinguisher $75 CFC 907.2 Fire Alarm System Required to be Installed and Maintained $1,000 CFC 907.2.8 Install and Maintain Smoke Detectors (Existing R-1) $250 CFC 907.8.5 Building owners shall be responsible to maintain the fire and life safety systems in an operable condition at all times. $1,000
CFC 912.4 Maintain Access To and Operation of Standpipes, FDC and Sprinkler control valves $250 CFC 1004.9 Post Occupant Load $125
CFC 1006.3.3 Single Exits $250
CFC 1010.1 Failure to Maintain Exit Doors $1,000
CFC 1010.1.4.4 Locks in Educational Occupancies $500
CFC 1010.1.9.4 Signage-Doors Unlocked During Business Hours $125 CFC 1010.1.9.5 Exit Door Locked/Secured with Non-approved Lock $500 CFC 1010.1.10 Panic Hardware Required $250
CFC 1010.2 Locks on Exit Gates $1,000
CFC 1011.1 Maintain Stairways $250
CFC 1011.7.4 Storage Under Stairways $500
CFC 1013.1 Exit Signs Required $250
CFC 1013.6.3 Failure to Provide Exit Signs with Emergency Power $250 CFC 1014.1 Maintain Handrails $250
CFC 1018.1 Aisles Required $250
CFC 1018.1 Obstruct Aisle or Exitway $500
CFC 1020.3 Maintain Corridor $250
CFC 1023.9 Stairway Identification $125
CFC 1025.1 Luminous Egress Pathway Markings in Highrise $125 CFC 1029.15 Bonding of Chairs Required $125
CFC 1030.5 Equip Bars/Grates On Sleeping Room With Approved Interior Release Devices $500 CFC 1031.1 Maintain Means of Egress $500
CFC 1031.2 Exit Reliability $1,000
CFC 1031.3 Obstructions in the Means of Egress $500
CFC 1031.4 Exit Sign illumination Required $250
CFC 1031.6 Finishes, Furnishings and Decorations $250
CFC 1031.7 Obstruct/Maintain Emergency Escapes $1,000
CFC 1031.1 Maintain Egress Lighting $250
CFC 1103.1 Construction Requirements in Existing Buildings $250 CFC 1104.1 Means of Egress for Existing Buildings $250
CFC 1104.16.7 Obstruct/Maintain Fire Escape $1,000
CFC 1113.1 Existing R-1 and R-2 Occupancy Requirements $250 CFC 1114.1 Existing Highrise Requirements $250
CFC 1115 Existing Group-I Requirements $250
CFC 1203.1 Maintain Emergency Power Equipment $500
CFC 1206.2 Stationary Storage Battery Systems $500
CFC 2101.1 Dry Cleaner Requirements $250
CFC 2203.4 Dust Collection Required $250
CFC 2303.2 Provide an approved emergency disconnect switch to stop transfer of fuel in event of emergency $500
CFC 2306.7.4 Failure to maintain an approved automatic emergency shutoff valve $500 CFC 2305.6 Warning signs shall be conspicuously posted within sight of each dispenser in the fuel dispensing area. $125
CFC 2404.2 Spray-Finish Operations Prohibited $1,000
CFC 2404.4 Fire Protection System Required for Spray Booths/Rooms $1,000 CFC 3103.2 Approval required to erect , operate or maintain a tent in excess of 400 sq ft $500 CFC 3103.5 Tents shall not be erected for a period of more than 180 days $500 CFC 3103.8 Location of Tents $250
CFC 3103.9 Tent Anchoring $250
CFC 3201.1 High Pile Storage Requirements $500
CFC 3313.1 Standpipe System Required During Construction $1,000 CFC 3504.1.1 Hot Work-Clearance to Combustibles $250
CFC 3504.1.7 Hot Work-Non Approved Location $250
CFC 3504.2.6 Fire Protection Equipment for Hot Work $250 CFC 3505.2 Storage of Welding Equipment $250
CFC 5001.3.3 Performance requirements of equipment/documentation $250 CFC 5001.3.3.8 Detection of gas or vapor release. $500
Administrative Citation Fines F1 - 7

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Code Section Violation Description(s) Fine
CFC 5001.5.1 Hazardous Material Management Plan $1,000
CFC 5001.5.2 Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement $1,000 CFC 5001.6.1 Permit/Monitoring requirements for out-of-service facilities $250 CFC 5003.1 General/Hazardous Materials $500
CFC 5003.1.1 Maximum Allowed Quantity Per Control Area $500 CFC 5003.2 Design/maintenance of equipment for hazardous materials $250 CFC 5003.2.2.1 Provide Emergency Shut-off Valves and Signs $250 CFC 5003.2.9.2 Testing frequency $125
CFC 5003.2.5 Empty Containers and Tanks $125
CFC 5003.2.6 Maintenance of Equipment, Machinery, and Req'd Detection and Alarm $500 CFC 5003.2.6.2 Defective Cylinders, Containers and Tanks Shall Be Removed from Service $250 CFC 5003.2.9 Required Testing of Equipment, Devices and Systems per 5003.2.9.1 $500 CFC 5003.3.1 Release of Hazardous Materials $1,000
CFC 5003.3.1.2 Provide Approved Method to Control Unauthorized Spills $250 CFC 5003.4 SDS Forms Readily Available $125
CFC 5003.5 Provide Hazardous Identification Signs $125
CFC 5003.5.1 Provide Markings or Labels on Containers or Packages $125 CFC 5003.9.1 Training of Personnel/Written Procedures $500 CFC 5003.9.3 Provide Guard Posts to Protect Storage Area or Tanks $250 CFC 5003.9.5 Provide Approved Means to Prevent Static Electricity Charge $250 CFC 5003.9.8 Separate Containers of Incompatible Materials $500 CFC 5003.9.9 Provide Shelves with Lip or Guard $125
CFC 5004.1 General Storage of Hazardous Materials $500
CFC 5004.2.2 Provide Secondary Containment for Hazardous Materials $250 CFC 5004.2.2.5 Approved monitoring method $250
CFC 5004.11 Keep Storage Area or Tanks Clear of Combustible Material $250 CFC 5005.2.1.4 Secondary Containment for Liquid Used in Open Systems Inside a Building $250 CFC 5005.3.5 Secondary Containment for Liquid Used in Open Systems Outside a Building $250 CFC 5303.4.3 Provide Labels on Gas Piping $125
CFC 5303.5.3 Secure Compressed Gas Cylinders $125
CFC 5307.3.1 Failure to provide mechanical ventilation or emergency alarm system where CO2 can collect $500
CFC 5307.3.2 Failure to provide gas detection system with CO2 systems $500 CFC 5601.1.3 Possession of Illegal Fireworks $1,000
CFC 5703.3 Site Assessment $500
CFC 5704.2.7.10 Leak Reporting $1,000
CFC 5704.2.11.3 Overfill prevention system $125
CFC 5704.2.11.4.2 Approved method of leak detection $500 CFC 5704.2.13.1.2 Conditions for tanks out of service for 90 days $500 CFC 5704.2.13.1.3 Conditions for tanks out of service for 1 year $1,000 CFC 5704.3.1.1 Store Flammable/Combustible Liquids in Approved Container $250 CFC 5704.3.2 Store Flammable/Combustible Liquid in Approved Cabinet(s) $250 CFC 5704.3.3.3 Remove Flammable Liquids Near Exits $500 CFC 5705.2.4 Discontinue Gravity Dispensing $250
CFC 5705.3.6 Discontinue Cleaning Inside Building with Flammable Liquids $500 CFC 5705.3.7.5.3 Provide Secondary Containment—Flammable and Combustible Liquids $250 CFC 5707.1.1 Approval/Permit Required for Mobile Fueling $250 CFC 6109.4
LP-gas containers stored near exit access doors, exits, stairways and/or areas used as means of egress $500
CFC 6109.13
LP-gas containers shall be stored within a suitable enclosure or otherwise protected against tampering $500
Except as otherwise specifically set forth , the administrative citation fine amount imposed pursuant to Chapter 1.09 to the Municipal Code Repeat Violations:

The administrative citation fine amount for a second violation of the same Code provision by the same responsible party within thirty-six (36) months Late Payment Charges:

Payment of the administrative citation fine amount after thirty (30) days from the date of the administrative citation shall be subject to an additional late Standard Fine:

Administrative Citation Fines F1 - 8

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP S
R
IOS
Driver or
Vehicle
Permittee
Franchisee
Driver or
Vehicle
Permittee
Franchisee
Driver or
Vehicle
Permittee
Franchisee
Driver or
Vehicle
Permittee
Franchisee
Driver or
Vehicle
Permittee
Franchisee
Schedule A $50 $50 $100 $100 $150 $150
$250
or Suspension
IOS
$500
$500
or
Suspension
IOS
$300
Schedule B N/A $100 N/A $200 N/A $300 N/A $500 N/A
$500
IOS
Schedule C
$250
or
Suspension
IOS
$500
$500
or
Suspension
IOS
$2,500 N/A N/A
$1,000
or
Revocation
IOS
$2,500
Schedule D N/A
$1,000
IOS
N/A
$5,000
or
Suspension
IOS

N/A N/A N/A
$5,000
or Suspension
IOS
See
Penalties
Conduct / Public Safety
Violation
See
Penalties
Conduct / Public Safety
Violation
= Revocation
= Immediate Out of Service (Driver and/or Vehicle) at the Full Discretion of the Police Penalty Schedules:

The following progressive penalties shall be applied when the same driver, vehicle permittee, or franchisee is guilty of a second or subsequent violation of the same rule or any combination of the rules listed for the same Progressive Penalty Schedule within any 24-month period. When IOS appears in a penalty, a driver or vehicle may be placed in an Immediate Out of Service status at the absolute discretion of the Police Officer.

Penalty
Schedules
Penalties
First Violation
Penalties
Second Violation
Penalties
Third Violation
Penalties
Fourth or More Violation
Penalties
Conduct / Public Safety
Violation
Exhibit 2 - Administrative Citation Schedule of Fines for Violations of Taxicab Rules and Regulations

SCHEDULE I

SCHEDULE OF FINES FOR VIOLATION OF TAXICAB RULES AND REGULATIONS Every franchisee, vehicle permittee and driver who does not comply fully with any one or more of the Department’s rules and regulations, with the terms and conditions of a taxicab franchise or the Santa Monica Municipal Code shall be guilty of a violation and subject to the penalty schedule as shown in the brackets at the end of each rule. Each day that a violation continues shall constitute a separate and distinct violation.

If a penalty due date falls on a weekend or holiday, penalties are due the next City business day.

Any suspension of a permit shall be recorded on the driver’s Permit Suspension Record and will be considered when applying Taxicab Rule 306f.

A permittee must serve a suspension during a period of time in which the Taxicab Driver’s Permit has been physically turned in to the City.

Monetary Penalty Increments:

Penalties shall accumulate without limit.

Suspension of Franchisee’s Franchise:

Whenever the cumulative amount of the monetary penalty assessed against any franchisee for any calendar quarter period exceeds $10,000, the franchisee’s franchise is subject to immediate suspension.

LEGEND:
= Suspension
Taxicab Fines F2 - 1

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP 415. Schedule A-Conduct
416. Schedule C
417. Schedule C
410. Schedule A
411. Schedule A-Conduct for 1st Violation, Schedule C-Conduct for 2nd Violation 412. Schedule C–Conduct
413. Schedule C–Conduct
414. Schedule A-Conduct for 1st Violation, Schedule C– Conduct for 2nd Violation 405. Schedule A-Public Safety
406. Schedule A-Conduct
407. Schedule C–Public Safety
408. Schedule C-Public Safety
409. Schedule C-Conduct
401. Schedule A–Conduct
402. Schedule C–Public Safety
403a. Schedule C – Public Safety
403b. Schedule C-Public Safety
404. Schedule C–Public Safety
303. none
304. none
305. none
306. none
307. none
242. Schedule B
243. Schedule B
244. Schedule C-Conduct or Schedule D-Conduct
301. none
302. none
237 Schedule B-Conduct
238 Schedule B-Conduct
239 Schedule B-Conduct
240 Schedule A-Conduct
241. Schedule B
232 Schedule B– Public Safety
233 Schedule B
234 Schedule B-Public Safety
235 Schedule B
236 Schedule B
227 Schedule B
228 Schedule B
229 Schedule B
230 Schedule A or Schedule B
231 Schedule B
222 Schedule B
223 Schedule B
224 Schedule D
225 Schedule B-Public Safety
226 Schedule B
217 Schedule D
218 Schedule B
219 Schedule B
220 Schedule B
221 Schedule B
212 Schedule B
213 Schedule B–Public Safety
214 Schedule A-Conduct or B-Conduct
215 Schedule B–Public Safety
216 Schedule D
207 Schedule D-conduct
208 Schedule B–Conduct
209 Schedule A-Conduct or B-Conduct
210 Schedule A-Conduct or Schedule B-Conduct
211 Schedule B
202 Schedule D
203 Schedule D
204 Schedule D-Conduct
205 Schedule B-Conduct
206 Schedule B – Conduct

ASSIGNED PENALTY SCHEDULE
Taxicab Rule Penalty Schedule
201a. Schedule D
201b. Schedule C
Taxicab Fines
F2 - 2

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Taxicab Rule Penalty Schedule
456b. Schedule A
456c. Schedule A
456d. Schedule C
457. Schedule A
458. Schedule A
452. Schedule A
453. Schedule A
454. Schedule A
455. Schedule A
456a. Schedule A
447. Schedule A–Public Safety
448. Schedule A
449. Schedule A
450. Schedule A
451. Schedule A
442. Schedule A
443. Schedule A
444. Schedule A
445. Schedule A
446. Schedule A
439a. Schedule C
439b. Schedule C-Conduct
439c. Schedule C
440. Schedule A-Conduct
441. Schedule C–Conduct
434b. Schedule A
435. Schedule C
436. Schedule A
437. Schedule A
438. Schedule A
430o. Schedule A
431. Schedule A
432. Schedule A-Conduct or Schedule C–Conduct at the Discretion of the City 433. Schedule A
434a. Schedule A–Conduct
430j. Schedule A-Conduct
430k. Schedule A-Conduct
430l. Schedule A-Conduct
430m. Schedule A-Conduct
430n. Schedule A
430e. Schedule A
430f. Schedule A-Conduct
430g. Schedule A-Conduct
430h. Schedule A
430i. Schedule A-Conduct
429. Schedule A
430a. Schedule A
430b. Schedule A
430c. Schedule A
430d. Schedule A
424. Schedule C
425. Schedule A-Public Safety
426. Schedule A-Public Safety
427. Schedule A
428. Schedule A-Conduct
422c. Schedule C
422d. Schedule A–Public Safety
423a. Schedule A-Public Safety
423b. Schedule A-Public Safety
423c. Schedule A-Public Safety
420b. Schedule C
420c. Schedule A
421. Schedule A-Public Safety
422a. Schedule A
422b. Schedule C
419b Schedule A
419c Schedule A-Conduct
419d Schedule C-Conduct
419e Schedule A
420a. Schedule C–Public Safety
418. Schedule C
419a Schedule A-Public Safety
Taxicab Fines
F2 - 3

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Taxicab Rule Penalty Schedule
702. none
703. none
631. Schedule A–Public Safety or Schedule B-Public Safety 632. Schedule B – Public Safety
701. none
626. Schedule B
627. Schedule B
628. Schedule B
629. Schedule A-Public Safety or Schedule B–Public Safety 630. Schedule C or Schedule D
621. Schedule B
622. Schedule B
623. Schedule A or Schedule B
624. Schedule A–Conduct or Schedule B-Conduct
625. Schedule A–Conduct or Schedule B-Conduct
616. Schedule B
617. Schedule B
618. Schedule B
619. Schedule B
620. Schedule B
611. Schedule A or Schedule B
612. Schedule A–Public Safety or Schedule B-Public Safety 613. Schedule A–Conduct
614. Schedule A or Schedule B
615. Schedule B
607f. Schedule A–Conduct or Schedule B-Conduct
607g. Schedule A or Schedule B
608. Schedule A-Public Safety or Schedule B – Public Safety 609. Schedule A-Public Safety or Schedule B–Public Safety 610. Schedule A or Schedule B
607a. Schedule A or Schedule B
607b. Schedule A or Schedule B
607c. Schedule A or Schedule B
607d. Schedule A–Conduct or Schedule B-Conduct
607e. Schedule A–Conduct or Schedule B-Conduct
602. Schedule B-Public Safety
603. Schedule A-Public Safety or B-Public Safety
604. Schedule A or Schedule B
605. Schedule A-Conduct or Schedule B-Conduct
606. Schedule A-Public Safety or Schedule B – Public Safety 511. none
512. none
513. none
514. none
601. Schedule A or Schedule B
506. Schedule B
507. Schedule B
508. Schedule B-Conduct
509. none
510. none
501. Schedule D
502. Schedule B
503. Schedule A-Conduct or Schedule B-Conduct
504. Schedule B-Conduct
505. Schedule B-Conduct
Taxicab FinesF2 - 4

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Code
Section Description City Penalty
Amount
Current
State Fees
Total
Penalty
Late Payment
Penalty Amount

3.04.030(a) Beach Parking Lot Permits (Sunset to Sunrise) $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.04.050(a) Payment of Posted Fee Required-Attendant $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.04.050(b) Payment of Posted Fee Required-Pay Machine $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.04.100 Parking Spaces $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00

3.06.040 Car Share Permit Required $150.50 $12.50 $163.00 $163.00

3.08.110 Preferential Parking $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00

3.12.270 Disobey Posted Signs $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00

3.12.380 Parking on Drive Apron/Parkway/Sidewalk $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $53.00

3.12.730 Green Zone - 15 Minutes $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00

3.12.740 Yellow Load Zone 7am - 6pm Mon-Sat $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00

3.12.760 White Zone - Max of 3 Minutes $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00

3.12.775a Disabled Placard - Use of Lost, Stolen, Revoked or $350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00

3.12.775b Disabled Placard - Not Used For Transport of Person $350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00

3.12.775c Disabled Placard - Use of Counterfeit, Forged, Altered

$350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00

3.12.790(b) Head in Parking $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.12.820 Block Passage of Vehicle In Alley $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00

3.12.830 Parking Prohibited in Specified Places $60.50 $12.50 $73.00 $73.00

3.12.840 Overtime Parking $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00

3.12.845 Street Sweeping $60.50 $12.50 $73.00 $73.00

3.12.850 30 Minute Parking Between 3-5 am $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.12.860 Oversize Vehicles - 9pm - 6am $60.50 $12.50 $73.00 $73.00

3.12.870 Oversize Commercial Vehicle in Residential Area $65.50 $12.50 $78.00 $78.00

3.12.880 Parking of Trailers $65.50 $12.50 $78.00 $78.00

3.12.890 Vehicle Parked for Advertising $92.50 $12.50 $105.00 $105.00

3.12.910 Wash Car - Street Alley $40.50 $12.50 $53.00 $53.00

3.12.920 Storing/Servicing/Rebuilding - Public Way $80.50 $12.50 $93.00 $93.00

3.12.930 Parking on Private Property w/o Permission $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00

3.12.950 Parking on Private Unpaved Lot $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00

3.12.1000 Vehicle Parked on Street for Sale $92.50 $12.50 $105.00 $105.00

3.12.1010 Unattended Vehicle-Keys in Ignition $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.12.1050 Parked on Front Lawn $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00

3.16.120 Operating a Parking Meter $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.16.240 O/T Meter Parking - Past Time Limits $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.16.241 O/T Lot Parking - Past Time Limit $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.16.242 Parking without charging at public electric vehicle charging station
$50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.16.250 Expired Meter $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

3.16.260 Parking Beyond Meter Space $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00 Code
Section Description Penalty
Amount
Current
State Fees
Total
Penalty
Late Payment
Penalty Amount
5200 Failure to Display Both Plates1 $25.00 See footnote #1 $25.00 $25.00 Exhibit 3 - Schedule of Civil Penalties for Parking
Violations and for Late Payments

SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS

CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS
Parking Fines F3 - 1

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Code
Section Description City Penalty
Amount
Current
State Fees
Total
Penalty
Late Payment
Penalty Amount
5201 Positioning of Plates1 $25.00 See footnote #1 $25.00 $25.00 5204 No Current License Plate Tab1 $25.00 See footnote #1 $25.00 $25.00 21113A Illegally Parked on State Property $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 21211B Parked in Bike Lane $80.50 $12.50 $93.00 $93.00
22500a Parked in Any Intersection $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 22500b Parked in Any Crosswalk $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 22500c Parked in Any Safety Zone $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 22500d Parked Within 15 feet of Fire Station $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 22500e Parked in Front of Private/Public Driveway $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 22500f Parked on Sidewalk (except electric carts) $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 22500g Parked near Excavation Causing Hazard $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 22500h Double Parking $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00
22500i Parked in Bus Zone $280.50 $12.50 $293.00 $29.00 22500k Parked on Any Bridge $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 22500I Stopping/Blocking Disabled Access Ramp $350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00 22500M Bus Lane $280.50 $12.50 $293.00 $29.00
22500.1 Parked in Fire Lane $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 22502 Curb Parking $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00
22502a Parked Within 18" of Curb $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 22507.8a Parked in Handicapped Space w/o ID $350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00 22507.8b Blocking Disabled parking $350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00 22507.8c Parked on/in Handicapped Access Area $350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00 22509 Parked on Hill w/o Securing Vehicle $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 22514 Parked within 15 Feet of Fire Hydrant $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 22515a Vehicle w.o Driver, Engine Running $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 22515b Setting Brake/Lock Wheels on Highway $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 22516 Vehicle Locked w/o Means to Escape $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 22520 Parked on Freeway - Non-Emergency $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 22520.5a Vending on or Near Freeways $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 22521 Parked Less than 7.5 Feet from RR Track $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 22522 Parked Less than 3 Feet from Sidewalk Ramp $350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00 22523a,b Abandon Vehicle on Highway $130.50 $12.50 $143.00 $143.00 22526a Gridlock - In Intersection $80.50 $12.50 $93.00 $93.00 22526b Gridlock - During Turn $80.50 $12.50 $93.00 $93.00 Code
Section Description Penalty Amount
Current
State Fees
Total
Penalty
Late Payment
Penalty Amount
Violation of Any Other Law Regulating the Parking or
Standing of Vehicles
$50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00

UNLISTED PROVISIONS OF THE LAW
1 The $25.00 penalty fee amount includes the $12.50 State Fee. If the violations are corrected within the period of time provided by the California Vehicle Code, the civil penalty shall be reduced to $10.00, and the State fee assessed shall be $5.00.

Parking Fines F3 - 2

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Fine Description
Police
Second and Third responses within the same fiscal year $164.86 each Fourth and subsequent responses within the same fiscal year $247.28 each Fire
False Alarm Response: Third and subsequent responses at the same location within the same calendar year.
323.52 each
Exhibit 4 - False Alarm Fine Schedule
Fines
False Alarm Fines F4 - 1

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Fine Description Fines
Fines to be assessed per item, per day.

Overdue Interlibrary Loan Material $1.00
Overdue Technology Device, In-House (maximum $5.00) 1.00 (per hour) Overdue Technology Device, Off-Site Loan (maximum $50.00) $5.00 (per day) Processing for Lost or Damaged Items $10.00
(per item plus cost
of item)
Collection Agency Referral $10.00
Exhibit 5 - Library Fine Schedule
Library Fines F5 - 1

ATTACHMENT F

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Master Fines Resolution [Revision 2] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
1 City Council Meeting: June 28, 2022 Santa Monica, California RESOLUTION NO. ________ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA ESTABLISHING

PARKING RATES AND PERMIT FEES FOR ALL CITY

PARKING FACILITIES AND RESOURCES
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Monica (the “City”) operates parking facilities in the Downtown area, including Parking Structures 1 through 10, the Ken Edwards Center parking structure, the Main Library parking structure and surface lot, the Civic Center Parking Structure and the Civic Auditorium parking lot; parking lots in the Main Street area; parking lots in the Downtown area, parking lots in the Mid-City area along the Wilshire Boulevard corridor; parking lot at the Santa Monica Pier; and parking lots at the beaches; and
WHEREAS, City-operated parking facilities serve visitors to areas throughout the City, including those who are working, doing business, and attending community events; and
WHEREAS, the City has designated preferential parking zones throughout the City with parking restrictions for each zone in order to manage parking availability for residents within each zone; and

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
2 WHEREAS, the City has designated on-street parking spaces with parking meters in order to regulate and manage traffic circulation and parking availability; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Monica (the “City Council”) is authorized to set parking rates and permit fees, by resolution, for the City’s parking facilities, preferential parking zones, and on-street parking meters and pay machines; and WHEREAS, the location of and rates for parking directly impact traffic and parking circulation patterns, traffic congestion and other traffic hazards, and parking availability; and
WHEREAS, adjusting the parking rates and permit fees as a means of regulating the use of all City parking facilities and resources distributes the parking load more evenly between residents and visitors, and maximizes the utility and use of all City parking facilities and resources, thereby making parking easier, reducing traffic hazards and congestion, and promoting the public convenience, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, on July 10, 2012, the City Council endorsed parking rate and permit fee changes recommended in the Walker Parking Study and further adopted Resolution Number 10694 (CCS) (“Resolution No. 10694”) establishing parking rates and permit fees for all City parking facilities and resources; and
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 10732 (CCS) (“Resolution No. 10732”), adjusting certain rates for the Main Library parking structure; and

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
3 WHEREAS, on or about April 9, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 10743 (CCS) (“Resolution No. 10743”), establishing new parking rates in Downtown parking structures at the lowest price generally available to Downtown residents for those who are disabled and living in multi-family buildings with one-hundred percent (100%) affordable housing units when no onsite parking is available; and WHEREAS, on June 25, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 10755 (CCS) (“Resolution No. 10755”), revising the City’s preferential parking permit rates; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 10860 (CCS) (“Resolution No. 10860”), revising the parking rates and permit fees for City parking facilities and resources as set forth in Resolution No. 10755 in order to: establish fees for one-day visitor permits and visitor permits that are valid for six months or less in preferential parking zones; include exemptions from and reductions to rates for vehicles with disabled placards that were previously established but inadvertently omitted from Resolution No. 10755; authorize the waiver of parking fees for City meetings and cosponsored events, and events at Santa Monica High School, to allow for a more streamlined approval process and increase efficiency in the overall administration of the City’s parking resources; and include rates for certain City parking facilities that were inadvertently omitted from Resolution No. 10755; and
WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 10889 (CCS) (“Resolution No. 10889”), to make administrative changes, include exemptions from permit rates for residents in the Beach Zone with disabled placards, and eliminate free parking for vehicles in the Southern Beach Zone after 4:00 p.m. in the winter; and

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
4 WHEREAS, on May 10, 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 10957 (CCS) (“Resolution No. 10957”), to increase rates at the Civic Center Parking Structure and Civic Auditorium parking lot; limit eligibility for monthly permits at Downtown Parking Structures 1 through 9, the Ken Edwards Center, the Main Library, the Civic Center Parking Structure, and the Civic Auditorium parking lot, and to make minor changes to address operational needs; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2016, staff requested, and received, City Council concurrence on a proposed administrative increase to certain parking rates for parking facilities located in the City’s Downtown as a means of discouraging daily Expo Light Rail (“E-Line”) park and ride activity and to further the parking goals set forth in the City’s Land Use and Circulation Element (“LUCE”); and
WHEREAS, the City Manager, in accordance with authority granted by the City Council, administratively increased rates for parking structures in the City’s Downtown; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2017, Council adopted Resolution Number 11053 (CCS) (“Resolution No. 11053”) to: reflect the administrative increase implemented on May 17, 2016; increase certain parking rates at the Beach parking lots to better maximize use of all Beach parking supply, including South Beach lots, Central Beach lots, and North Beach lots; provide for a pilot discount validation program for employees of commercial establishments located in the City’s Downtown; and provide for payment by the Judicial Council of California and Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for permits

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
5 and validations assigned to the Civic Center Parking Structure and Civic Auditorium parking lot; and
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 11110 (CCS) (“Resolution No. 11110”), to: revise transient rates and permit fees at Parking Structure 1 through 10, Ken Edwards Center, and Main Library parking structure; make changes to the incremental weekday and weekend transient parking rates at the Civic Center Parking Structure and Civic Auditorium parking lot while maintaining the current daily maximum rates; extend the pilot Downtown employee discount validation program for through June 30, 2019; eliminate free disabled placard parking in the Main Library parking structure and Parking Structure 10 to ensure parking availability and discourage long-term storage parking in these facilities; increase the fee for an annual Senior Beach parking permit to align with Los Angeles County Beaches and Harbor parking permit rates; and provide minor adjustments to address operational needs; and WHEREAS, on May 8, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 11112 (CCS) (“Resolution No. 11112”), to include an extension of the bulk parking fee for the California Judicial Council through June 30, 2019 that was inadvertently omitted from Resolution No. 11110; and
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 11122 (“Resolution No. 11122”) to include an increase to preferential parking permit fees based on a cost of services fee study; and
WHEREAS, on April 30, 2019, the City Manager, in accordance with authority granted by the City Council, administratively increased rates for on-street parking meters,

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
6 Main Street parking lots, Central Beach Zone parking lots, and Pier Deck parking lot rates to further the parking goals set forth in the City’s Land Use and Circulation Element (“LUCE”); and
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 11184 to extend the pilot Downtown employee discount validation program for two additional years through June 30, 2021, include an extension of the bulk parking fee for the California Judicial Council through June 30, 2020, and provide for minor adjustments to address operational needs, and
WHEREAS, on January 14, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 11222 to adopt an administrative charge for overstaying at public electric vehicle charging stations beyond the maximum time to encourage turnover at parking spaces designated for public use; and
WHEREAS, on June 23, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 11265 to extend the bulk parking fee agreement for the State of California Judicial Council through June 30, 2021, eliminate free overnight parking in the Main Street surface parking lots, and provide for minor adjustments to address operational needs, and WHEREAS, on June 22, 2021, Council adopted Resolution Number 11345 to revise the preferential parking permit fees based on a cost of services fee study, extend the pilot Downtown employee discount validation program for two additional years through June 30, 2023 to support the City’s business and economic recovery efforts, and provide for minor administrative adjustments to address operational needs, and

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
7 WHEREAS, on February 22, 2022, Council adopted Resolution Number 11402 to authorize the City Manager or designee to establish hours operation for the Santa Monica Pier Deck Parking Lot, and
WHEREAS, the City now desires to revise and increase the preferential parking permit fees by 3.1%, which reflects the Citywide salaries and benefits total compensation factor increase for FY 2022-23, and provide for minor administrative adjustments to address operational needs, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to restate all fees and rates set by Resolution Number 11402 as well as incorporate changes made by this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The parking rates established in this Resolution are effective upon the adoption of this Resolution, and at such time as signs notifying the public of the provisions herein have been posted by the City, unless otherwise noted. Parking rates that require approval from the California Coastal Commission are effective upon approval by that body.

SECTION 2. As used in this Resolution, the term “daily” means a period commencing upon the time of entry of a vehicle into a parking facility between 12:00 a.m. to midnight.

SECTION 3. The off-street parking rates listed in this Resolution apply to vehicles entering the specified off-street parking facility for the specified times, unless a special

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
8 event is scheduled that is anticipated to increase traffic and parking demands. If a special event is scheduled, the daily maximum may be increased up to $30.00 on weekdays (Monday through Friday) and $35.00 on weekends (Saturday and Sunday), with approval of the City Manager or the Director of the Department of Transportation, which approval may be granted based on the City’s best interests. The daily maximum may be set as either a flat rate per entry or an increased incremental rate based upon time of entry and duration of parking.

SECTION 4. The following weekday (Monday through Friday) and weekend (Saturday and Sunday) transient parking rates are established for Downtown Parking Structures 1 through 8 and Ken Edwards Center parking structure:

1. Weekday parking rates shall be as follows:
a. First ninety minutes shall be free;
b. Next thirty minutes shall be $2.00;
c. Next one hour shall be $1.50 each 30 minutes;
d. Next one hour shall be $2.00 each 30 minutes;
e. Next one hour shall be $2.50 each 30 minutes;
f. Next one hour shall be $3.00 each 30 minutes;
g. Daily maximum shall be $20.00 per entry;
h. Lost tickets shall be charged $20.00 per ticket.

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
9 2. Weekend parking rates shall be as follows:
a. First ninety minutes shall be free;
b. Next ninety minutes shall be $2.00 each 30 minutes;
c. Next one hour shall be $2.50 each 30 minutes;
d. Next one hour shall be $3.00 each 30 minutes;
e. Next one hour shall be $4.00 each 30 minutes;
f. Daily maximum shall be $25.00 per entry;
g. Lost tickets shall be charged $25.00 per ticket.

3. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

4. Parking on Sundays is free from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Vehicles entering these parking structures before 6:00 a.m. and leaving between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. shall be subject to payment of all rates due from entry to 6:00 a.m.

Vehicles entering these parking structures after 6:00 a.m. and remaining in the structure after 11:00 a.m. shall be subject to payment of all rates due from 11:00 a.m. to exit. Vehicles parked in these structures before 6:00 a.m. and remaining after 11:00 a.m. shall be subject to payment of all rates due before and after the free period.

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
10 SECTION 5. The following weekday (Monday through Friday) and weekend (Saturday and Sunday) transient parking rates are established for Parking Structure 9:

1. Weekday parking rates shall be as follows:
a. First ninety minutes shall be free;
b. Next thirty minutes shall be $2.00;
c. Next one hour shall be $1.00 each 30 minutes;
d. Next one hour shall be $1.50 each 30 minutes;
e. Next one hour shall be $2.00 each 30 minutes;
f. Next one hour shall be $3.00 each 30 minutes;
g. Daily maximum shall be $17.00 per entry;
h. Lost tickets shall be charged $17.00 per ticket.

2. Weekend parking rates shall be as follows:
a. First ninety minutes shall be free;
b. Next thirty minutes shall be $2.00;
c. Next one hour shall be $1.50 each 30 minutes;
d. Next one hour shall be $2.00 each 30 minutes;
e. Next one hour shall be $2.50 each 30 minutes;

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
11 f. Next one hour shall be $3.00 each 30 minutes;
g. Daily maximum shall be $20.00 per entry;
h. Lost tickets shall be charged $20.00 per ticket.

3. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

4. Parking on Sundays is free from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Vehicles entering this parking structure before 6:00 a.m. and leaving between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. shall be subject to payment of all rates due from entry to 6:00 a.m.

Vehicles entering this parking structure after 6:00 a.m. and remaining in the structure after 11:00 a.m. shall be subject to payment of all rates due from 11:00 a.m. to exit. Vehicles parked in this structure before 6:00 a.m. and remaining after 11:00 a.m. shall be subject to payment of all rates due before and after the free period.

SECTION 6. The following weekday (Monday through Friday) and weekend (Saturday and Sunday) transient parking rates are established for Parking Structure 10:

1. Weekday parking rates shall be as follows:
a. First two hours shall be $0.50 each 30 minutes;
b. Next one hour shall be $1.00 each 30 minutes;
c. Next one hour shall be $1.50 each 30 minutes;

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
12 d. Next one hour shall be $2.00 each 30 minutes;
e. Next one hour shall be $3.00 each 30 minutes;
f. Daily maximum shall be $17.00 per entry.

2. Weekend parking rates shall be as follows:
a. First two hours shall be $0.50 each 30 minutes;
b. Next one hour shall be $1.50 each 30 minutes;
c. Next one hour shall be $2.00 each 30 minutes;
d. Next one hour shall be $2.50 each 30 minutes;
e. Next one hour shall be $3.00 each 30 minutes;
f. Daily maximum shall be $20.00 per entry.

3. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

SECTION 7. The following weekday (Monday through Friday) and weekend (Saturday and Sunday) transient parking rates are established for the Main Library Parking Structure:

1. Weekday parking rates for the subterranean structure shall be as follows:
a. First thirty minutes shall be free;

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
13 b. Next one hour shall be $0.50 each 30 minutes;
c. Next ninety minutes shall be $1.00 each 30 minutes;
d. Next two hours shall be $1.50 each 30 minutes;
e. Next one hour shall be $2.00 each 30 minutes;
f. Daily maximum shall be $14.00 per entry;
g. Lost tickets shall be charged $14.00 per ticket.

2. Weekend parking rates shall be as follows:
a. First thirty minutes shall be free;
b. Next two and a half hours shall be $1.00 each 30 minutes; c. Daily maximum shall be $5.00 per entry;
d. Lost tickets shall be charged $5.00 per ticket.

3. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

SECTION 8. The following transient parking rates are established for the Main Library surface parking lot:

1. Parking rates for the surface parking lot shall be $1.00 per hour.

2. Parking for vehicles displaying current and valid disabled placards shall be

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
14 free.

3. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

SECTION 9. The following weekday (Monday through Friday) and weekend (Saturday and Sunday) transient parking rates are established for the Civic Center Parking Structure and Civic Auditorium parking lot:

1. Weekday parking rates shall be as follows:
a. First thirty minutes shall be free;
b. Next one hour shall be $0.50 each 30 minutes;
c. Next ninety minutes shall be $1.00 each 30 minutes;
d. Next two hours shall be $1.50 each 30 minutes;
e. Next one hour shall be $2.00 each 30 minutes;
f. Daily maximums shall be $14.00 per entry;
g. Lost tickets shall be charged $14.00 per ticket.

2. Weekend parking rates shall be as follows:
a. First thirty minutes shall be free;
b. Next two and a half hours shall be $1.00 each 30 minutes;

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
15 c. Daily maximums shall be $5.00 per entry;
d. Lost tickets shall be charged $5.00 per ticket.

3. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

4. Parking for vehicles displaying current and valid disabled placards shall be free, except during events where a capacity crowd is anticipated. For purposes of this subsection 4, “capacity crowd” means an event that is anticipated to sell out. During capacity crowd events, vehicles displaying disabled placards shall be subject to payment of the applicable event rate.

5. The City Manager, the Director of the Department of Transportation, or the Parking Manager, is hereby authorized to waive parking fees at the Civic Center Parking Structure and Civic Auditorium parking lot for up to twenty-five events at Santa Monica High School per school year (July 1 to June 30). Such waivers may be denied if there is a conflict with pre-existing activity, such as another event occurring at the Civic Center concurrent to the time of the Santa Monica High School event.

SECTION 10. The total number of monthly parking permits and validations to be sold shall be determined by the City’s Parking Manager, or the Director of the Department of Transportation, and distributed by location with the goal of ensuring that the utilization of parking facilities is distributed so as to maximize existing inventory based on occupancy. Monthly parking permit fees for (i) employees working in a commercial

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
16 establishment located within the area bounded by California Avenue, Lincoln Boulevard, Pico Boulevard, and Ocean Avenue, including businesses located on both the east and west sides of Lincoln Boulevard and north and south sides of Pico Boulevard; or (ii) residents living in buildings with no on-site parking within the area bounded by California Avenue, Lincoln Boulevard, Pico Boulevard, and Ocean Avenue, including buildings located on both the east and west sides of Lincoln Boulevard and north and south sides of California Avenue and Pico Boulevard; shall be:

1. Downtown Parking Structures 1 through 8 and Ken Edwards Center – $220 per month for permits valid at all times.

2. Downtown Parking Structure 9 – $187 per month for permits valid at all times.

3. Downtown Parking Structure 10 – $187 per month for permits valid at all times.

4. Civic Center Parking Structure and Civic Center Parking Lot – $160 per month for permits valid at all times.

5. Main Library Parking Structure – $154.00 per month for permits valid at all times.

6. The City may offer up to a twenty-percent monthly volume discount for accounts with fifty or more permits as of May 10, 2016, to facilitate the distribution of parkers to facilities that are underutilized.

7. Monthly parking fees shall be $65.00 per month for vehicles with disabled placards owned and operated by residents of a multi-family building if:

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
17 a. The building is located within the area bounded by Second Street, Wilshire Boulevard, Fourth Street, and Colorado Avenue; and
b. One hundred percent of the building’s units are affordable housing; and c. No onsite parking exists for the building.

8. Commencing on June 27, 2017 and continuing through June 30, 2023, discounted parking validations shall be made available for employees working in commercial establishments located within the area bounded by California Avenue, Lincoln Boulevard, Pico Boulevard, and Ocean Avenue, including businesses located on both the east and west sides of Lincoln Boulevard and north and south sides of Pico Boulevard.
a. Validation for up to six hours of parking – $6.00
b. Validation for up to twelve hours of parking – $9.00

9. Free parking validations for parking sessions up to three hours (inclusive of any grace period) shall be made available to all current Santa Monica College Emeritus program students.

10. Free parking validations shall be made available to all Ken Edwards Center Senior program users.

11. Free parking validations for parking sessions up to ninety minutes shall be made available to all Main Library Public Services and Youth Program users.

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
18 SECTION 11. The following rates are established for the Santa Monica Pier Deck parking lot:

1. Summer (April 1 through October 31):
a. Weekday parking rates shall be $3.75 per hour; $18.00 daily maximum. b. Weekend parking rates shall be $3.75 per hour; $18.00 daily maximum.

2. Winter (November 1 through March 31):
a. Weekday parking rates shall be $2.50 per hour; $12.00 daily maximum. b. Weekend parking rates shall be $3.50 per hour; $15.00 daily maximum.

3. Parking for vehicles displaying valid and current disabled placards shall be free.

4. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

5. The City Manager or designee shall establish hours of operation for the Santa Monica Pier Deck Parking Lot.

6. No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle in the Santa Monica Pier Deck Parking Lot during times when it is prohibited pursuant to subsection (5) or without a valid parking permit.

SECTION 12. The following rates are established for the Northern Beach Zone, lots 9N through 4N:

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
19 1. Summer (April 1 through October 31) parking rates shall be $10.00 per entry on weekdays and $12.00 per entry on weekends.

2. Winter (November 1 through March 31) parking rates shall be $7.00 per entry on weekdays and $10.00 per entry on weekends.

3. Parking for vehicles displaying current and valid disabled placards shall be free.

4. Bus parking shall be six times the daily rate.

5. Recreational vehicle parking shall be four times the daily rate.

6. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

SECTION 13. The following rates are established for the parking lot at the Annenberg Community Beach House at Santa Monica State Beach:

1. Summer (April 1 through October 31) parking rates shall be $3.00 per hour; $12.00 daily maximum.

2. Winter (November 1 through March 31) parking rates shall be $3.00 per hour; $8.00 daily maximum.

3. Parking for vehicles displaying current and valid disabled placards shall be free.

4. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
20 parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

SECTION 14. The following rates are established for the Central Beach Zone, lots 3N, 1N, 1S, 2S, and 3S:

1. Summer (April 1 through October 31) parking rates shall be $15.00 per entry.

2. Winter (November 1 through March 31) parking rates shall be $7.00 per entry on weekdays and $10.00 per entry on weekends.

3. Lots or spaces designated for short-term parking shall be $1.00 per hour.

4. Parking for vehicles displaying current and valid disabled placards shall be free.

5. Bus parking shall be six times the daily rate.

6. Recreational vehicle parking shall be four times the daily rate.

7. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

SECTION 15. The following fees are established for the Southern Beach Zone, lots 4S and 5S:

1. Summer (April 1 through October 31) parking rates shall be $10.00 per entry on weekdays and $12.00 per entry on weekends.

2. Winter (November 1 through March 31) parking rates shall be $7.00 per entry on weekdays and $10.00 per entry on weekends.

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
21 3. Lots or spaces designated for short term parking shall be $1.00 per hour.

4. Parking for vehicles displaying current and valid disabled placards shall be free.

5. Patrons of the Sunday morning Main Street Farmers Market shall be eligible to receive a refund of parking fees with proof of a purchase from the market.

No more than one refund shall be issued per person per day.

6. Vendors, staff, and performers of the Main Street Farmers Market shall be eligible for refunds or validations of parking fees.

7. Bus parking shall be three times the daily rate.

8. Recreational vehicle parking shall be four times the daily rate.

9. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

SECTION 16. The following permit rates are established for all beach zones:

1. Permits are available for employees working in a commercial establishment located along the beach or at the Santa Monica Pier at the following rates:
a. Annual $155 per year
b. Semi-Annual $105 per six months
c. Monthly $27 per month

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
22 2. Permits are available for employees working in a commercial establishment located along Main Street south of Pico Boulevard, including businesses on cross streets up to Neilson Way to the west of Main Street and up to Third Street to the east of Main Street, at the following rates:
a. Annual $155 per year
b. Semi-Annual $105 per six months
c. Monthly $20 per month

3. Permits are available for California residents at the following rates:
a. Annual $155 per year
b. Semi-Annual $105 per six months
c. Monthly $27 per month
d. Senior Beach $25 per year

4. Permits are available for residents living within the Beach Zone, at the following rates:
a. Annual Overnight Resident Permit $150 per year
b. Annual Overnight Resident’s Guest Permit $150 per year c. Semi-Annual Overnight Resident Permit $75 per six months d. Semi-Annual Overnight Resident’s Guest Permit $75 per six months

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
23 e. Monthly Overnight Resident Permit $15 per month
f. Monthly Overnight Resident’s Guest Permit $15 per month g. A resident living within the Beach Zone may obtain one free annual resident permit with his or her current and valid disabled placard.

SECTION 17. The following rates are established for Downtown lots 27, 29, and 30:

1. Each thirty minutes shall be $1.25; $17.50 daily maximum.

2. The monthly parking rates shall be:
a. $132.00 per month for permits valid on weekdays only, from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Any vehicle parking outside of the valid times shall be subject to payment of the applicable parking rates listed in subsection 1 of this Section 17.
b. $82.50 per month for permits valid on weeknights and weekends only, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., Monday through Thursday, and from 4:00 p.m.

Friday to 6:00 a.m. Monday. Any vehicle parking outside of the valid times shall be subject to payment of the applicable parking rates listed in subsection 1 of this Section 17.

3. Parking for vehicles displaying current and valid disabled placards shall be free.

4. Lots or spaces designated for short-term parking shall be $2.00 per hour.

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
24 5. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

SECTION 18. The following rates are established for Mid-City lots 7, 8, and 12:

1. Each hour shall be $1.00; $14.00 daily maximum.

2. $55.00 per month for permits valid at all times.

3. Parking for vehicles displaying current and valid disabled placards shall be free.

4. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

SECTION 19. The following rates are established for Main Street area lots 9, 10, 11, and 26:

1. Each hour shall be $1.25.

2. The monthly parking permit rate shall be $80.00.

3. Parking for vehicles displaying current and valid disabled placards shall be free.

4. For parking spaces reserved for construction or other exclusive use, the parking rate shall be three times the daily maximum.

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
25 SECTION 20. The applicable parking rates for any parking facility not specified in this Resolution shall be equal to the parking rates for the closest adjacent on-street parking meters.

SECTION 21. In no case may parking rates for any off-street parking facility, including parking structures and parking lots, be increased or decreased more than 50% from the rates established herein. At any time, off-street monthly parking rates may not be increased or decreased more than ten percent with less than 30 days’ notice by posting in the affected facility. In no case shall monthly parking rates be increased or decreased more than 25% at any one time.

SECTION 22. Per the Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 3.16.170, the City Manager or designee is authorized to make on-street parking meter rate changes up to 25% not more than twice per year based on the City’s planning and transportation policies including the Land Use and Circulation Element (“LUCE”). Therefore, the following fees shall be established for all on-street parking meters and pay machines:

1. July 2012 to June 2019:
a. Downtown Meter Zone - $2.00 per hour
b. Beach Meter Zone - $2.00 per hour
c. Citywide (“All Other”) Meter Zone - $1.00 per hour

2. Effective July 1, 2019:
a. Downtown Meter Zone - $2.50 per hour

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
26 b. Beach Meter Zone - $2.50 per hour
c. Citywide (“All Other”) Meter Zone - $1.25 per hour
SECTION 23. The following fees shall be established for all preferential parking zones:

1. Annual permits shall be as follows:
a. Resident permits
i. First permit shall be $21.65;
ii. Second permit shall be $26.81;
iii. Third permit shall be $43.30;
iv. Fourth permit, and any additional permits, shall be $67.02 each. b. Visitor permits shall be $32.99 each.
c. A second permit, and any additional permits, for Zone P (Barnard Way) shall be $103.10.

2. Permits valid for six months or less shall be as follows:
a. Resident permits
i. First permit shall be $12.37;
ii. Second permit shall be $17.53;

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
27 iii. Third permit shall be $27.84;
iv. Fourth permit, and any additional permits, shall be $38.15 each. b. Visitor permits shall be $16.50 each.
c. A second permit, and any additional permits, for Zone P (Barnard Way) shall be $51.55.
d. A thirty-day temporary new resident permit shall be free. e. A one-day visitor permit picked up from the City Parking Office shall be $2.00.
f. A one-day visitor permit self-printed by the resident shall be free.

SECTION 24. The City reserves the right to round the parking fees down to the nearest whole dollar.

SECTION 25. Preferential parking permits for employees of businesses and commercial property owners, as set forth in Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 3.10, are available for $32.99 per three months.

SECTION 26. In accordance with SMMC 3.12.830 (b), Driveway parking permits are available to an owner or occupant of a single-unit commercial property for on-street parking in front of the driveway of that commercial property for $30.93 per year.

SECTION 27. Parking permits for overnight parking in residential areas for oversized vehicles may be issued by the City upon application of any person and are

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
28 subject to the provisions in SMMC 3.12.900. Parking permits for overnight parking in residential areas for oversized vehicles shall be free.

SECTION 28. Short-term reserved parking may be purchased, if available, in any parking lot or parking structure for events, including, but not limited to, filming, construction or local events, at three times the maximum parking rate.

SECTION 29. In addition to the rates set forth above, for all parking spaces designated for use of public electric vehicle charging stations, whether off-street or onstreet, there shall be an additional overstay charge of $1.00 per minute for any vehicle that remains parked in the space beyond the maximum posted time allowed for charging in that space. The overstay charge shall be imposed beginning five minutes after the expiration of the maximum posted time allowed for charging in the space. The maximum overstay charge shall be $53.00. The overstay charge may be automatically charged to the account being used by a vehicle to charge at a smart public electric vehicle charging station.

SECTION 30. All parking rates and permit fees shall be per vehicle for the specified period and non-refundable once issued.

SECTION 31. All permits shall incur replacement fees as follows:

1. First replacement for a stolen permit shall be free only with a copy of a police report.

2. Second replacement for a stolen permit shall be 50% of the original permit rate only with a copy of a police report.

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
29 3. Third replacement for a stolen permit, any replacement for a lost permit, or replacement of a stolen permit without a copy of a police report shall be replaced upon payment of the full rate.

SECTION 32. Parking passes or permits that are issued via access cards shall require payment of an initial non-refundable fee of $10.00.

SECTION 33. All off-street parking rates set forth in this Resolution include parking facility tax in accordance with SMMC 6.70.020.

SECTION 34. The City Manager, or the Director of the Department of Transportation, is hereby authorized to waive parking fees, other than the overstay charge for parking spaces designated for use of public electric vehicle charging stations, for those attending City meetings and City-sponsored events that are free and open to the public, if the City Manager, or the Director of the Department of Transportation, determines that such waiver is in the City’s best interest, which may include, but not be limited to:
facilitating participation in the City’s public meetings, furthering Council policies, and encouraging participation in the City-sponsored events.

SECTION 35. The City Manager, or the Director of the Department of Transportation, is hereby authorized to issue parking permits to other governmental agencies to use in the course of business at no charge, if determined that such waiver is in the City’s best interest.

SECTION 36. Resolution No. 11402 (CCS), adopted by the City Council on February 22, 2022, is repealed in its entirety as of the effective date of the parking rates

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT G
30 set forth in this Resolution, with the exception that to the extent any parking rates in this Resolution are determined to require Coastal Commission approval, those parking rates as previously set forth in Resolution No. 11402 (CCS) shall remain in effect until Coastal Commission approval of those parking rates is obtained.

SECTION 37. If there are any conflicts between the parking rates adopted in this Resolution and any parking rates adopted by prior resolution, the rates adopted in this Resolution shall take precedence.

SECTION 38. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
DOUGLAS T. SLOAN
City Attorney

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Parking Rates Resolution [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT H
City Council Meeting: June 28, 2022 Santa Monica, California RESOLUTION NUMBER ________(CCS)
(City Council Series)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA

ESTABLISHING NEW CLASSIFICATIONS AND ADOPTING SALARY RATES FOR THE FOLLOWING NEW OR EXISTING CLASSIFICATIONS: ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE,

ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN II, ASSISTANT CITY

ATTORNEY, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER, COMMUNITY & CULTURAL

SERVICES ASSISTANT, BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTOR, COMMUNITY

PARTNERSHIPS MANAGER, CROSSING GUARD, EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR

TO THE CITY MANAGER, FACILITIES ATTENDANT, LABORER TRAINEE, LIBRARY

ASSISTANT I, LIBRARY PAGE, MOTOR COACH OPERATOR TRAINEE, PIER AND

BEACH ADMINISTRATOR, POLICE CADET, PRODUCTION ASSISTANT, PUBLIC

SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR, PUBLIC INFORMATION MANAGER, TRAFFIC

ENGINEER, URBAN FOREST COORDINATOR, VIDEO INTERN, VIDEO

TECHNICIAN I, VIDEO TECHNICIAN II, AND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The following salary levels are hereby established, effective July 3, 2022, for the indicated permanent classifications:

Assistant City Attorney $286,320/annual, Step 5
Assistant to the City Manager $164,544/annual, Step 5
Business License Inspector $82,236/annual, Step 5
Community Partnerships Manager $153,336/annual, Step 5
Executive Administrator to the City Manager $122,724/annual, Step 5 Library Assistant I $58,800/annual, Step 5
Pier and Beach Administrator $137,616/annual, Step 5
Public Services Administrator $134,868/annual, Step 5
Public Information Manager $162,504/annual, Step 5
Traffic Engineer $140,736/annual, Step 5
Urban Forest Coordinator $72,840/annual, Step 5
Youth and Family Services Program Administrator $117,396/annual, Step 5 In addition, classifications listed in Section 1 also will receive any City Council approved salary increases that become effective on July 3, 2022, provided the classifications are in bargaining units that are receiving an increase.

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Salary Resolution (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget)

ATTACHMENT H
SECTION 2. The following salary levels are hereby established, effective July 3, 2022, for the indicated as-needed classifications:

Administrative Aide $18.17/hour, Step 1
Administrative Intern $18.17/hour, Step 1
Administrative Intern II $19.53/hour, Step 1
Community & Cultural Services Assistant $18.17/hour, Step 1 Crossing Guard $18.17/hour, Step 1
Facilities Attendant $18.17/hour, Step 1
Laborer Trainee $18.17/hour, Step 1
Library Page $18.17/hour, Step 1
Motor Coach Operator Trainee $18.17/hour, Step 1
Police Cadet $18.17/hour, Step 1
Production Assistant $18.17/hour, Step 1
Video Intern $18.17/hour, Step 1
Video Technician I $18.17/hour, Step 1
Video Technician II $19.53/hour, Step 1

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Douglas T. Sloan
City Attorney

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Salary Resolution (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget)

POSITION AND CLASSIFICATION CHANGES

ATTACHMENT I

FUND DEPT FTE POSITION TITLE FUND DEPT FTE POSITION TITLE 01 City
Council 1.0 Staff Assistant III 01 City Council 1.0 Administrative Staff Assistant 1 Add/Delete - 53 CDD 1.0 Pier Administrator 53 CDD 1.0 Pier and Beach Administrator 1 Reclassification - 01 DOT 1.0 Transportation Engineer 01 DOT 1.0 Traffic Engineer 2 Title change - 01 Police 1.0 Youth and Family Services Support
Coordinator 01 Police 1.0 Youth and Family Services Program Administrator 1 Reclassification -
01 Police 1.0 Crime Prevention Coordinator 01 Police 1.0 Public Information Coordinator Reclassification - 01 PW 2.0 Urban Forest Supervisor 01 PW 2.0 Urban Forest Coordinator 1 Reclassification - 01 PW 0.5 Public Works Inspector 3 Add 0.5
PERMANENT EMPLOYEES TOTAL 0.5 FTE

DELETE ADD

REASON NET FTE
CHANGE
1 Cost of the position/position change will be offset by savings and/or the reallocation of budgeted funds within department budgets, resulting in a net zero impact to the budget. 2 Position change has no net impact to the budget.
3 Cost of the position will be offset by additional revenues .

June 28, 2022

12.A.i
Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Position and Classification Changes (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP

ATTACHMENT J
1 City Council Meeting: June 28, 2022 Santa Monica, California

RESOLUTION NO. ____ (CCS)
(CITY COUNCIL SERIES)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA

ESTABLISHING THE GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Government Code section 7910 and Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, the City Council of the City of Santa Monica (the “City Council”) is required to establish its appropriations limit by resolution; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code sections 7901 and 7910, the final calculation of the appropriations limit has been determined, and the adjustment factors on which the calculation is based are a 7.55% change in the State of California per capita personal income and a -0.71% change in population growth for the County of Los Angeles; and
WHEREAS, documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit has been available to the public for at least fifteen (15) days prior to adoption as required by Government Code section 7910.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

12.A.j
Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Gann Appropriations Limit Resolution (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT J
2 SECTION 1. For purposes of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, the City of Santa Monica appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 shall be $2,708,057,642 calculated as follows:

FY 2021-22 Gann Limit a $2,535,966,926
Factors
State Per Capita Personal Income Change b 1.07550
County Population Change c 0.99290 =
Total adjustment factor (b*c) X 1.06786
FY 2022-23 Gann Limit $2,708,057,642
a
As adopted by City Council on June 22, 2021 (Resolution No. 11347 CCS) b,c Per State Department of Finance – May 2022
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
DOUGLAS T. SLOAN
City Attorney

12.A.j
Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Gann Appropriations Limit Resolution (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT K
1 City Council Meeting: June 28, 2022 Santa Monica, California RESOLUTION NUMBER _________ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA ADOPTING PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022- 23 FUNDED BY
SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and

12.A.k
Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: SB1 Road Repair and Accountability Act Resolution FY 2022-23 (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and

ATTACHMENT K
2 WHEREAS, the City will receive an estimated Two Million One Hundred and Nineteen Thousand One Hundred and Seventy-Four Dollars ($2,119,174) in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2022-23 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, in Fiscal Year 2022-23 the City is receiving SB 1 funding that will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City has undergone a public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the City’s priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate two (2) streets/roads throughout the City this year; and
WHEREAS, the 2018 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in a “good” condition and this revenue will help maintain the overall quality of the City’s road system; and

12.A.k
Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: SB1 Road Repair and Accountability Act Resolution FY 2022-23 (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and

ATTACHMENT K
3 WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in the City’s local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The following list of newly proposed projects will be funded in-part or solely with Fiscal Year 2022-23 and prior Fiscal Year(s) unprogrammed Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Revenue: $2,119,174
Project Name/Location: Annual Paving and Sidewalk Repair Program - Project is located along Wilshire Boulevard and Ocean
Avenue in the Ocean Park and Wilshire-Montana
neighborhoods.

Project Description: The Annual Paving and Sidewalk Repair Program upgrades and repairs streets, curbs, gutters, curb ramps, bus pads, and other related surface features in the public right of way. The neighborhoods identified are subject to change based on City priorities and ongoing needs assessment.

Estimated Useful Life: 27 years
Estimated Project Schedule: Start: October 2022
End: October 2023

12.A.k
Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: SB1 Road Repair and Accountability Act Resolution FY 2022-23 (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and

ATTACHMENT K
4 SECTION 3. The Annual Paving and Sidewalk Repair Project budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23 is amended as follows:

Appropriate Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funding to C2604600.689610.99005.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
DOUGLAS T. SLOAN
City Attorney

12.A.k
Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: SB1 Road Repair and Accountability Act Resolution FY 2022-23 (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Contract No. 10684

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Professional Services Agreement ("Agreement"), entered into as of __,__-""'·-'=-----L�, 20_L1,. ("Execution Date"), by and between the City of Santa Monica ("City") and West Coast Care Foundation, Inc. ("Consultant"), is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS:

A. The City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of the City.

B. The Consultant is qualified to do business, and is doing business, in the State of California. The Consultant represents it has the background, knowledge, experience and expertise necessary to provide the services set forth in this Agreement.

C. The City and the Consultant now desire to enter into an agreement for the consultant to provide professional services to the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows:

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Term. This Agreement begins on the Execution Date and terminates on June 30, 2019, unless sooner terminated in accordance with Section 14.

1.1 Option to Extend. The City, in its sole and complete discretion, shall have the option to renew the agreement for up to (3) additional (1) year periods ("Extension Term"). The City may exercise its option by letter to the Contractor fron, its City Manager, and the exercise of the option shall automatically extend the term of this Agreement up through the extension period.

2. Compensation. The City will compensate the Consultant for the Services performed in an amount not to exceed $250,000, for the term of this agreement as set forth in Exhibit B, Budget. The total compensation for the term of this agreement and any Extension Term shall not exceed $1,000,000 as set forth in Exhibit B, Budget.

3. Consultant Services. The Consultant will perform all of the services ("Services") described in Exhibit A, Scope of Services. The Consultant will complete the Services in accordance with Exhibit B, Budget.

4. City Services. The City agrees to:

4.1 Make available to the Consultant any currently existing documents, data or information required for the performance of the Services.

4.2 Designate a representative authorized to act on behalf of City. - 1 -
August 2017

ATTACHMENT O
O-1

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24

4.3 Promptly examine and render findings on all documents submitted for staff review by the Consultant.

5. Compensation. The City will compensate the Consultant for the Services performed in an amount not to exceed $250,000, as set forth in Exhibit B.

6. Invoices. The Consultant will invoice the City for the Services in accordance with Exhibit B and the City will pay any undisputed amount within 30 days of receipt.

7. Notices. All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement, must be in writing and will be deemed served when delivered personally, by email, or on the third business day after deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, addressed as follows:
7 .1 All notices, demands, requests or approvals to the City:

Police Department
City of Santa Monica
333 Olympic Drive
Santa Monica, California 90401
Attention: Neela Patel, Senior Administrative Analyst, Police Re: Contract No. 10684
with a copy to:

Santa Monica City Attorney's Office
1685 Main Street, Third Floor
Santa Monica, California 90401
Attention: City Attorney
Re: Contract No. 10684
7 .2 All notices, demands, requests or approvals to the Consultant:

West Coast Care Foundation, Inc.
8218 Belford Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Attention: Lenore Hooks
Re: Contract No. 10684

8. Independent Parties. Both parties to this Agreement will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, or joint venturers of one another.

Neither the City nor its officers or employees will have any control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's agents, employees, or subconsultants, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement.

9. Integrated Contract. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties. Any preliminary negotiations and agreements of any kind or nature are merged into this Agreement. No oral - 2 -
August 2017

ATTACHMENT O
O-2

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 agreement or implied covenant may be held to vary the provisions of this Agreement.

This Agreement may be modified only by written agreement signed by City and the Consultant, and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

10. Insurance. Prior to commencing work, the Consultant must procure, maintain and pay for insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services by the Consultant or the Consultant's agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants for the duration of this Agreement. The Consultant must obtain insurance that, at a minimum, meets the requirements for insurance set forth in Exhibit C, Insurance Requirements and Verifications.

11. Defense and Indemnification.

11. 1 Indemnification. As to the Consultant's Services produced under this Agreement, the Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, boards and commissions, and employees (collectively, "City") from and against any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or costs, including but not limited to attorney's fees, or payments for injury to any person or property (collectively, "Losses") caused or claimed to be caused by the acts, errors and/ or omissions of the Consultant, or the Consult�nt's employees, agents, officers, and subconsultants. The Consultant's responsibilities under this Section 10.1 include liability arising from, connected with, caused by, or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the City, which may be in combination with the acts or omissions of the Consultant, its employees, agents or officers, or subconsultants; provided, however, that the Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless shall not include any Losses arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Notwithstanding the Consultant's obligation to defend City hereunder, City has the right to conduct its own defense and seek reimbursement for reasonable costs of defense from the Consultant, if City chooses to do so.

11.2 Enforcement Costs. The Consultant agrees to pay any and all costs the City incurs enforcing the indemnity, defense and hold harmless provisions set forth in Section 10. L

12. Prohibition Against Transfers.

12.1 The Consultant may not assign, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement or any interest therein directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so without the City's consent will be null and void, and any assignee, hypothecatee or transferee acquires no right or interest by reason of such attem.pted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
- 3 -
August 2017

ATTACHMENT O
O-3

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24

12.2 The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Consultant or of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member of the Consultant, if a partnership or joint venture or syndicate exists, which results in changing the control of the Consultant, will be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means 50% or more of the voting power of the corporation.

13. Permits and Licenses. The Consultant, at its sole expense, must obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all required business and professional permits, licenses and certificates.

14. Waiver. A waiver of any breach of this Agreement may not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement.

15. Default and Termination.

15.1 If the Consultant fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement, and if the default is not cured within a period of five days after the City's written notice of default specifying the nature of the default, City may immediately terminate this Agreement by written notice to the Consultant.

15.2 The City has the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement by giving ten days' written notice to the Consultant. Upon termination of this Agreement, City will pay the Consultant any compensation earned and unpaid up to the effective date of termination.

16. Compliance with Law. The Consultant must comply with all laws of the State of California and the United States, and all ordinances, rules, and regulations enacted or issued by City.

17. Discrimination. The Consultant may not discriminate in the provision of services hereunder because of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, sexual orientation, marital status, AIDS or disability.

18. Nuisance. The Consultant may not maintain, commit, or permit the maintenance or commission of any nuisance in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.

19. Records.

19.l The Consultant must maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by the City for any services provided where compensation is on the basis of hourly rates, subconsultant costs, or other direct costs. The Consultant must keep the records, together with supporting documents, separate from other documents and records and maintain them for a period of three years after receipt of final payment.
-4-
August 2017

ATTACHMENT O
O-4

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24

19.2 The Consultant must maintain records in s_ufficient detail to permit an evaluation of the Services and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Consultant must clearly identify all records and make them readily accessible to the City. At the City's request, the Consultant must provide records in an electronic format and, if necessary, access to any proprietary software to view such electronic records.

19.3 The Consultant must allow the City to have free access to the Consultant's books and records and to inspect all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. The City has the right to examine or audit the Consultant's records, and the Consultant agrees to cooperate with any examination or audit of its records. If a City audit discloses an error of 5% or more in information reported by the Consultant, the Consultant agrees to pay the cost of the City's audit computed on the basis of four times the direct payroll of the audit staff completing the audit and audit report.

20. Work Product; Reports.

20.1 Any work product prepared or caused to be prepared by the Consultant or any subconsultant for this Agreement will be the exclusive property of City. No work product given to or prepared by the Consultant or any subconsultant pursuant to this Agreement may be made available to any individual or organization by the Consultant without prior written approval by City.

20.2 At the City's request, the Consultant must furnish reports concerning the status of the Services.

21. Standard of Care. The Consultant agrees to provide all Services, including services performed by any subconsultant, in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the Consultant's profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions.

22. Subconsultants.

22.1 If the Consultant proposes to have any subconsultant perform any part of the Services, the Consultant must submit a request for approval in writing, describing the scope of work to be subcontracted, the name of the proposed subconsultant, and the total price or hourly rates used in preparing an estimated cost for the subconsultant's services. The City, in its sole discretion, may grant or deny the request.

22.2 The Consultant will be responsible for the quality of any subconsultant' s work.

Every subcontract or agreement of any kind entered into between the Consultant and any subconsultant (or between any subconsultant and others) must contain the following provision:

This agreement is consistent with all terms and conditions of the Agreement No. 10684 (CCS) entered into between the City of Santa Monica and the Consultant on -----
- 5 -
August 2017

ATTACHMENT O
O-5

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24

23. Governing Law. The laws of the State of California, without regard to any choice of law provisions, will govern this Agreement.

24. Venue and Jurisdiction. The City and the Consultant agree that the Services will take place in Los Angeles County. Any litigation arising out of this Agreement may only be brought in either the United States District Court, Central District of California, or the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, West District, as appropriate. The parties agree that venue exists in either court, and each party expressly waives any right to transfer to another venue. The parties further agree that either court will have personal jurisdiction over the parties to this Agreement.

25. Survival of Provisions and Obligations. Any provision of this Agreement, which by its nature nmst be exercised after termination of this Agreement, will survive termination and remain effective for a reasonable time. Any obligation that accrued prior to termination of this Agreement will survive terrn.ination of this Agreement.

26. Exhibits. The following exhibits are incorporated by reference into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.

Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Scope of Services
Budget
Insurance Requirements
In witness whereof, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

ATTEST:
df1iui Ji()dtuJAn-U�

DENISE ANDERSON-WARREN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

LANE DILG
City Attorney
-6-

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
West Coast Care Foundation, Inc.

By: -------,,- ---:;;.-1"'""- ---:-----:a.------;------- Name: --,L"""'-""'C.�=-c.--=--=_:_=----�----
Title: -----"'=--===�.«....<::=-----'-"''-1.p,,.:>._<.,"'-'-'= August 2017

ATTACHMENT O
O-6

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Exhibit A
Scope of Services
Performance Requirements - Consultant's Services
Consultant shall dedicate a minimum of three (3) employees to the Joint Homeless Outreach Service Provider Program to provide all of the following services ("Services") on a daily basis:

Perform daily outreach and intervention services to homeless persons within a geographic service area that will be determined by the Santa Monica Police Department's Homeless Liaison Program ("HLP") Team upon the basis of police calls for service, and/or service needs as demonstrated by the Homeless Services Registry, or other service-related data.

Provide up to seven-day-per-week availability during a wide range of variable hours for special operations according to the needs of the program, the geographic area to be served, and the working hours of the HLP Team (which vary according to team objectives). Generally, services will be provided during weekdays and may include early morning hours or late night hours.

Provide availability via telephone to the Santa Monica Police Department, other interrelated social service providers, and clients around the clock while assisting the HLP T earn with its mission.

Provide accessibility via email.

Go out each day in a systematic pattern within an established service area to contact homeless persons who are living on the streets of Santa Monica, and provide face-to-face intervention/ outreach efforts on the street where homeless persons are found.

Provide the constant care, incentive, and information necessary to encourage individuals to change behavior contributing to their homelessness.

Provide recent arrivals with information they need to provide alternatives to taking up residency on the streets of Santa Monica, such as referrals to service providers in areas such persons have left from or wish to return to.

Provide/ coordinate transportation to reunite qualified subjects with family members via the "Project Homecoming" program, or other relocation resources provided by the City or other social service providers.

Provide transportation to court (for subjects who do not qualify for Project Homecoming because of outstanding warrants) and stand by in court to advocate for resolutions that will allow subjects to be returned to family members.

Provide referrals to local service providers and ensure follow up. As needed, provide transportation of subjects to various area care providers and interact with care provider to

ATTACHMENT O
O-7

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 ensure that the referral will adequately address eachsubject'sneeds or circumstances.

Provide notification to the Santa Monica Police Department regarding potential criminal activity encountered during outreach efforts in order to allow the HLP Team to promptly formulate a proper law enforcement response.

Attend community and business meetings with HLP team members to provide a social service perspective on situations.

Client Record Maintenance
Consultant shall comply with the following client record maintenance requirements:

Provide case management and follow-up services for program clients. This includes but is not limited to Santa Monica City Attorney emails and telephone calls, conversations and meetings with hospital staff, follow-up with psychiatric services, interacting with Santa Monica Human Services personnel regarding exchange of ideas and information, and follow-up with other social service providers.

Through program resources administered by the Santa Monica Police Department, procure and distribute homelessness resources (temporary housing vouchers, homeless service provider information, Project Homecoming information, etc.) to homeless population as necessary.

Accept referrals from the HLP Team that are received via the HLP team non-emergency community help line and offer assistance to Santa Monica residents and businesses that are having homelessness-related problems.

Provide monthly and quarterly activity reports including results of monthly census, log of daily activities, number of daily contacts, number of persons relocated, outcomes of post-relocation follow- up, hours worked by service provider employees, and other additional information as determined by the program administrator.

Provide detailed, monthly billing for services, including a specific breakdown of salary and benefit costs for employees and managers, line-item detail of non-salary supplies and expenses, and overhead costs for maintaining communications, transportation, insurance, and facilities.

ATTACHMENT O
O-8

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 ExhibitB
Budget
The Consultant shall provide a minimum of two employees dedicated to the Joint Homeless Outreach Service Provider Program to provide services on a daily basis. The Consultant shall submit monthly invoices and supporting documentation with details of all Services provided and overhead costs incurred for City review and approval.

The Consultant shall be compensated for approved services and overhead costs in an amount not to exceed $250,000 per year for the term of the agreement. Estimated monthly cost is $20,833 as follows: Salary and benefits costs for an outreach coordinator, an administrator, an outreach staff person and a joint outreach assistant - $19,500; overhead to include communications equipment, vehicle and transportation costs, insurance, accounting fees, outreach supplies, such as food gift cards, bus tokens, water and granola bars, and facilities management - $1,333.

Any additional term of this agreement will be based on the same budgeted amounts.

The total compensation for the term of this agreement and any Extenstion Term shall not exceed One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00).

ATTACHMENT O
O-9

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Exhibit C
Insurance Requirements and Verifications
Professional Services Agreement Insurance Requirements
No Professional Liability Insurance Required
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.

Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering COL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal and advertising injury, with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (Insurance Services Office Form CG 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and Code 9 (non-owned), with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits and Employers' Liability Insurance with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease (see footnote #l).

If the Consultant maintains broader coverage or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Santa Monica req11ires and shall be entitled to any broader coverage and higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Santa Monica.

Other Insurance Provisions

1. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
a. Additional Insured Status: The City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the COL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in

ATTACHMENT O
O-10

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 connection with such work or operations. COL coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance (at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CG 20 10 11 85, or if not available, through the addition of a combination of (1) CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38 and (2) CG 20 37).
b. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this Agreement, the Consultant's insurance shall be primary coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Offices Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. c. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required herein shall state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after notice has been given to the City of Santa Monica.
d. Waiver of Subrogation: Consultant hereby grants to the City of Santa Monica a waiver of any right of subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City of Santa Monica by virtue of payment of any loss. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Santa Monica has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Santa Monica. The City of Santa Monica may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide satisfactory proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City of Santa Monica.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in California with a current AM. Best rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Santa Monica.

Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City of Santa Monica with original certificates and amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage provided by this clause). All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Santa Monica before work commences. However, failure to obtain required documents

ATTACHMENT O
O-11

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them.

The City of Santa Monica reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including the endorsements required herein, at any time.

Failure to Maintain Insurance Coverage
If Consultant, for any reason, fails to maintain insurance coverage which is required pursuant to this Agreement, the same shall be deemed a material breach of contract. The City of Santa Monica, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from the Consultant resulting from said breach.

Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein. All exceptions must be approved in writing by the Risk Manager.

Footnotes
# 1: Workers' Compensation insurance coverage is not required if the Consultant does not have employees. The Consultant must, however, execute the City's Workers' Compensation Coverage Exemption Declaration Form.

ATTACHMENT O
O-12

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 FIRST MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT NO. 10684 (CCS)
This First Modification of Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) (“First Modification”), entered into as of _________________(“Execution Date”), by and between the City of Santa Monica (“City”), a municipal corporation, and West Coast Care Foundation, Inc (“Consultant”) is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS
A. On or about June 24, 2018, the City and Consultant entered into Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) for homeless outreach services (“Original Agreement”).

B. The City and Consultant now desire to modify the Original Agreement to extend the initial term of the Agreement and to adjust accordingly the compensation paid to the Consultant.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Now, therefore, the undersigned parties do hereby mutually agree to modify the Original Agreement as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Original Agreement entitled “Term” is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
“Term. This Agreement begins on the Execution Date and terminates on June 30, 2021, unless sooner terminated in accordance with Section 14.

1.1 Option to Extend. The City, in its sole discretion, shall have the option to renew the Agreement for one (1) additional one-year period (“Extension Term”). The City may exercise this option by sending written notice to Consultant, after which the term of this Agreement shall be automatically extended through the Extension Term.”

2. Section 4 of the Original Agreement entitled “Compensation” is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

Compensation. The City will compensate the Consultant for the Services performed in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for the term of this Agreement and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B-1, Budget. The total compensation for the term of this Agreement and any Extension Term shall not exceed $1,000,000 as set forth in Exhibit B-1.

3. Exhibit B to the Original Agreement shall be replaced and superseded with Exhibit B-1, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A567D687-AB48-4307-8272-69BAB9CE53AC 6/25/2020

ATTACHMENT O
O-13

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24

4. Except as expressly modified by this First Modification, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Modification as of the date and year first written above.

ATTEST:
______________________________

DENISE ANDERSON-WARREN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________

LANE DILG
City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
a municipal corporation
By: ______________________________

RICK COLE
City Manager
ABC Corporation
#VENDOR
By: _______________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: A567D687-AB48-4307-8272-69BAB9CE53AC 6/24/2020
George S. Cardona
Interim City Attorney
6/24/2020
RH
West Coast Care
Ron Hooks
City Attorney
Lane Dilg
6/25/2020 6/25/2020
City Clerk
Denise Anderson-Warren

ATTACHMENT O
O-14

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Exhibit A
Scope of Services
Performance Requirements - Consultant's Services
Consultant shall dedicate a minimum of three (3) employees to the Joint Homeless Outreach Service Provider Program to provide all of the following services ("Services") on a daily basis:

Perform daily outreach and intervention services to homeless persons within a geographic service area that will be determined by the Santa Monica Police Department's Homeless Liaison Program (“HLP”) Team upon the basis of police calls for service, and/or service needs as demonstrated by the Homeless Services Registry, or other service-related data.

Provide up to seven-day-per-week availability during a wide range of variable hours for special operations according to the needs of the program, the geographic area to be served, and the working hours of the HLP Team (which vary according to team objectives). Generally, services will be provided during weekdays and may include early morning hours or late night hours.

Provide availability via telephone to the Santa Monica Police Department, other interrelated social service providers, and clients around the clock while assisting the HLP Team with its mission.

Provide accessibility via email.

Go out each dayin a systematic pattern within an established service area to contact homeless persons who are living on the streets of Santa Monica, and provide face-to-face intervention/outreach efforts on the streetwhere homeless persons are found.

Provide the constant care, incentive, and information necessary to encourage individuals to change behavior contributing to their homelessness.

Provide recent arrivals with information they need to provide alternatives to taking up residency on the streets of Santa Monica, such as referrals to service providers in areas such persons have left from or wish to return to.

Provide/coordinate transportation to reunite qualified subjects with family members via the "Project Homecoming" program, or other relocation resources provided by the City or other social service providers.

Provide transportation to court (for subjects who do not qualify for Project Homecoming because of outstanding warrants) and stand by in court to advocate for resolutions that will allow subjects to be returned to family members.

Provide referrals to localservice providers and ensure follow up. Asneeded, provide transportation of subjects to various area care providers and interact with care provider to ensure that the referral will adequately address eachsubject's needs orcircumstances.

Provide notification to the Santa Monica Police Department regarding potential criminal DocuSign Envelope ID: A567D687-AB48-4307-8272-69BAB9CE53AC

ATTACHMENT O
O-15

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 activity encountered during outreach efforts in order to allow the HLP Team to promptly formulate a proper law enforcement response.

Attend community and business meetings with HLP team members to provide a social service perspective on situations.

Client Record Maintenance
Consultant shall comply with the following client record maintenance requirements:

Provide case management and follow-up services for program clients. This includes but is not limited to Santa Monica City Attorney emails and telephone calls, conversations and meetings with hospital staff, follow-up with psychiatric services, interacting with Santa Monica Human Services personnel regarding exchange of ideas and information, and follow-up with other social service providers.

Through program resources administered by the Santa Monica Police Department, procure and distribute homelessness resources (temporary housing vouchers, homeless service provider information, Project Homecoming information, etc.) to homeless population as necessary.

Accept referrals from the HLP Team that are received via the HLP team non-emergency community help line and offer assistance to Santa Monica residents and businesses that are having homelessness-related problems.

Provide monthly and quarterly activity reports including results of monthly census, log of daily activities, number of daily contacts, number of persons relocated, outcomes of post-relocation follow- up, hours worked by service provider employees, and other additional information as determined by the program administrator.

Provide detailed, monthly billing for services, including a specific breakdown of salary and benefit costs for employees and managers, line-item detail of non-salary supplies and expenses, and overhead costs for maintaining communications, transportation, insurance, and facilities.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A567D687-AB48-4307-8272-69BAB9CE53AC

ATTACHMENT O
O-16

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Exhibit B-1
Budget
The Consultant shall provide a minimum of two employees dedicated to the Joint Homeless Outreach Service Provider Program to perform the Services on a daily basis.

Consultant shall submit monthly invoices and supporting documentation with details of all Services provided and overhead costs incurred to the City for its review and approval.

The Consultant shall be compensated for all services and overhead costs approved by the City in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for each year of the Agreement Term.

The monthly overhead costs for Consultant are estimated to be $12,500 and includes the salary and benefits costs for an outreach coordinator, an administrator, an outreach staff person, and a joint outreach assistant.

Any Extension Term of this Agreement shall be based on the same budgeted amounts.

The total amount of compensation paid to Consultant for the Term of this Agreement and for any Extension Term shall not exceed $1,000,000.00.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A567D687-AB48-4307-8272-69BAB9CE53AC

ATTACHMENT O
O-17

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 FIRST MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT NO. 10684 (CCS)
This First Modification of Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) (“First Modification”), entered into as of _________________(“Execution Date”), by and between the City of Santa Monica (“City”), a municipal corporation, and West Coast Care Foundation, Inc (“Consultant”) is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS
A. On or about June 24, 2018, the City and Consultant entered into Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) for homeless outreach services (“Original Agreement”).

B. The City and Consultant now desire to modify the Original Agreement to extend the initial term of the Agreement and to adjust accordingly the compensation paid to the Consultant.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Now, therefore, the undersigned parties do hereby mutually agree to modify the Original Agreement as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Original Agreement entitled “Term” is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
“Term. This Agreement begins on the Execution Date and terminates on June 30, 2021, unless sooner terminated in accordance with Section 14.

1.1 Option to Extend. The City, in its sole discretion, shall have the option to renew the Agreement for one (1) additional one-year period (“Extension Term”). The City may exercise this option by sending written notice to Consultant, after which the term of this Agreement shall be automatically extended through the Extension Term.”

2. Section 4 of the Original Agreement entitled “Compensation” is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

Compensation. The City will compensate the Consultant for the Services performed in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for the term of this Agreement and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B-1, Budget. The total compensation for the term of this Agreement and any Extension Term shall not exceed $1,000,000 as set forth in Exhibit B-1.

3. Exhibit B to the Original Agreement shall be replaced and superseded with Exhibit B-1, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A567D687-AB48-4307-8272-69BAB9CE53AC 6/25/2020

ATTACHMENT O
O-18

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24

4. Except as expressly modified by this First Modification, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Modification as of the date and year first written above.

ATTEST:
______________________________

DENISE ANDERSON-WARREN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________

LANE DILG
City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
a municipal corporation
By: ______________________________

RICK COLE
City Manager
ABC Corporation
#VENDOR
By: _______________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: A567D687-AB48-4307-8272-69BAB9CE53AC 6/24/2020
George S. Cardona
Interim City Attorney
6/24/2020
RH
West Coast Care
Ron Hooks
City Attorney
Lane Dilg
6/25/2020 6/25/2020
City Clerk
Denise Anderson-Warren

ATTACHMENT O
O-19

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Exhibit A
Scope of Services
Performance Requirements - Consultant's Services
Consultant shall dedicate a minimum of three (3) employees to the Joint Homeless Outreach Service Provider Program to provide all of the following services ("Services") on a daily basis:

Perform daily outreach and intervention services to homeless persons within a geographic service area that will be determined by the Santa Monica Police Department's Homeless Liaison Program (“HLP”) Team upon the basis of police calls for service, and/or service needs as demonstrated by the Homeless Services Registry, or other service-related data.

Provide up to seven-day-per-week availability during a wide range of variable hours for special operations according to the needs of the program, the geographic area to be served, and the working hours of the HLP Team (which vary according to team objectives). Generally, services will be provided during weekdays and may include early morning hours or late night hours.

Provide availability via telephone to the Santa Monica Police Department, other interrelated social service providers, and clients around the clock while assisting the HLP Team with its mission.

Provide accessibility via email.

Go out each dayin a systematic pattern within an established service area to contact homeless persons who are living on the streets of Santa Monica, and provide face-to-face intervention/outreach efforts on the streetwhere homeless persons are found.

Provide the constant care, incentive, and information necessary to encourage individuals to change behavior contributing to their homelessness.

Provide recent arrivals with information they need to provide alternatives to taking up residency on the streets of Santa Monica, such as referrals to service providers in areas such persons have left from or wish to return to.

Provide/coordinate transportation to reunite qualified subjects with family members via the "Project Homecoming" program, or other relocation resources provided by the City or other social service providers.

Provide transportation to court (for subjects who do not qualify for Project Homecoming because of outstanding warrants) and stand by in court to advocate for resolutions that will allow subjects to be returned to family members.

Provide referrals to localservice providers and ensure follow up. Asneeded, provide transportation of subjects to various area care providers and interact with care provider to ensure that the referral will adequately address eachsubject's needs orcircumstances.

Provide notification to the Santa Monica Police Department regarding potential criminal DocuSign Envelope ID: A567D687-AB48-4307-8272-69BAB9CE53AC

ATTACHMENT O
O-20

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 activity encountered during outreach efforts in order to allow the HLP Team to promptly formulate a proper law enforcement response.

Attend community and business meetings with HLP team members to provide a social service perspective on situations.

Client Record Maintenance
Consultant shall comply with the following client record maintenance requirements:

Provide case management and follow-up services for program clients. This includes but is not limited to Santa Monica City Attorney emails and telephone calls, conversations and meetings with hospital staff, follow-up with psychiatric services, interacting with Santa Monica Human Services personnel regarding exchange of ideas and information, and follow-up with other social service providers.

Through program resources administered by the Santa Monica Police Department, procure and distribute homelessness resources (temporary housing vouchers, homeless service provider information, Project Homecoming information, etc.) to homeless population as necessary.

Accept referrals from the HLP Team that are received via the HLP team non-emergency community help line and offer assistance to Santa Monica residents and businesses that are having homelessness-related problems.

Provide monthly and quarterly activity reports including results of monthly census, log of daily activities, number of daily contacts, number of persons relocated, outcomes of post-relocation follow- up, hours worked by service provider employees, and other additional information as determined by the program administrator.

Provide detailed, monthly billing for services, including a specific breakdown of salary and benefit costs for employees and managers, line-item detail of non-salary supplies and expenses, and overhead costs for maintaining communications, transportation, insurance, and facilities.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A567D687-AB48-4307-8272-69BAB9CE53AC

ATTACHMENT O
O-21

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Exhibit B-1
Budget
The Consultant shall provide a minimum of two employees dedicated to the Joint Homeless Outreach Service Provider Program to perform the Services on a daily basis.

Consultant shall submit monthly invoices and supporting documentation with details of all Services provided and overhead costs incurred to the City for its review and approval.

The Consultant shall be compensated for all services and overhead costs approved by the City in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for each year of the Agreement Term.

The monthly overhead costs for Consultant are estimated to be $12,500 and includes the salary and benefits costs for an outreach coordinator, an administrator, an outreach staff person, and a joint outreach assistant.

Any Extension Term of this Agreement shall be based on the same budgeted amounts.

The total amount of compensation paid to Consultant for the Term of this Agreement and for any Extension Term shall not exceed $1,000,000.00.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A567D687-AB48-4307-8272-69BAB9CE53AC

ATTACHMENT O
O-22

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 SECOND MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT NO. 10684 (CCS)
This Second Modification of Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) (“Second Modification”), entered into as of _________________(“Execution Date”), by and between the City of Santa Monica (“City”), a municipal corporation, and West Coast Care Foundation, Inc. (“Consultant”), is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS
A. On or about June 24, 2018, the City and Consultant entered into Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) for homeless outreach services (“Original Agreement”).

B. On or about June 25, 2020, the City and Consultant entered into a First Modification of Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) (“First Modification”) which extended the initial term, modified the City’s option to extend the Original Agreement, and adjusted the compensation paid to Consultant. The Original Agreement and First Modification may be referred to collectively herein as “the Agreement.”
C. The City and Consultant now desire to modify the Agreement further to adjust the current fiscal year’s compensation paid to the Consultant and to amend the scope of services provided to the City.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Now, therefore, the undersigned parties do hereby mutually agree to modify the Original Agreement as follows:

1. Section 2 of the Agreement entitled “Compensation”, as modified by the First Modification, is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

Compensation. The City shall compensate Consultant for the Services performed and provided to City in an amount not to exceed $200,000 during the term of this Agreement and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B-2, Budget. The total compensation paid to Consultant for all services performed and provided to City under this Agreement and any subsequent modification thereto shall not exceed $1,000,000.

2. Section 3 of the Original Agreement entitled “Consultant Services” is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

Consultant Services. The Consultant shall perform and provide to City all of the services described in Exhibit A-2, Scope of Services (hereinafter “Services”). The DocuSign Envelope ID: 2637039D-6D56-4229-AC20-BF44D1BD6CD3 2/19/2021

ATTACHMENT O
O-23

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Consultant shall perform and provide the Services to City in accordance with Exhibit B-2, Budget.

3. Exhibit A-1 of the Agreement, as modified by the First Modification, and Exhibit B of the Agreement are hereby replaced and superseded by Exhibit A-2 and Exhibit B-2, respectively. Exhibits A2 and B-2 are attached to this Second Modification and are incorporated into the Original Agreement.

4. Except as expressly modified by this Second Modification, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2637039D-6D56-4229-AC20-BF44D1BD6CD3

ATTACHMENT O
O-24

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Modification as of the date and year first written above.

ATTEST:
______________________________

DENISE ANDERSON-WARREN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________

LANE DILG
City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
a municipal corporation
By: ______________________________

RICK COLE
City Manager
ABC Corporation
#VENDOR
By: _______________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2637039D-6D56-4229-AC20-BF44D1BD6CD3 George Cardona
Interim City Attorney
2/16/2021
RH
West Coast Care
2/17/2021
Ron Hooks
Interim City Manager
Lane Dilg
2/19/2021 2/22/2021
City Clerk
Denise Anderson-Warren

ATTACHMENT O
O-25

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Exhibit A-2
Scope of Services
A. One member of the Consultant team will be available via telephone from 0500 to 2000 each day of the year.

B. Consultant to provide direct homeless outreach services in the field for a total of 25 hours per week or a total of 1,300 hours per year.

C. Consultant to provide daily homeless outreach services within the geographic service area of the City of Santa Monica beach and Pier.

D. Consultant to provide outreach services Monday – Friday at 1100 am at the Blue Gazebo on the Santa Monica Pier.

E. Consultant to develop action plans for at least 250 homeless people per year.

F. Consultant to provide case management and follow-up services for 250 program clients per year. This includes, but is not limited to, Santa Monica City Attorney emails and telephone calls, conversations and meetings with hospital staff, follow-up with psychiatric services, interacting with Santa Monica Human Services personnel regarding exchange of ideas and information, and follow-up with other social service providers.

G. Consultant to provide monthly activity reports including results of monthly census, log of daily activities or hours worked, number of daily contacts, number of persons temporarily/transitionally sheltered and number permanently housed, number of family reunifications, hours worked by service provider employees, and other additional information as determined by the program administrator.

H. Consultant to provide detailed, monthly invoices for services provided, including a specific breakdown of salary and benefit costs for all staff, line-item detail of non-salary supplies and expenses, and overhead costs for maintaining communications, transportation, insurance, and facilities.

I. Consultant to provide homeless engagement training to SMFD personnel at least once a year.

The training shall be provided for each of the three shifts spread over three days and two different timeslots to accommodate all shifts and 40-hour personnel.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2637039D-6D56-4229-AC20-BF44D1BD6CD3

ATTACHMENT O
O-26

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Exhibit B-2
Budget
The Consultant shall be compensated for services provided in Exhibit A-2 in an amount not to exceed $150,000 per year for the term of the agreement. Estimated monthly cost is $12,500 and covers salary and benefits, operating costs, overhead to include communications equipment, vehicle and transportation costs, insurance, accounting fees, outreach supplies, such as food gift cards, bus tokens, water and granola bars, and facilities management.

Effective February 1, 2021 the Consultant shall be compensated an additional $50,000 in one-time CARES and Economic Recovery funding for staffing costs associated with services provided in Exhibit A-2 for a total amount not to exceed $200,000 for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 term of the agreement.

Any Extension Term of this Agreement shall be based on the original budgeted amount of $150,000, unless otherwise authorized by City Council. The total amount of compensation paid to Consultant for the Term of this Agreement and for any Extension Term shall not exceed $1,000,000.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2637039D-6D56-4229-AC20-BF44D1BD6CD3

ATTACHMENT O
O-27

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 THIRD MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT NO. 10684 (CCS)
This Third Modification of Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) (“Third Modification”), entered into as of (“Execution Date”), by and between the City of Santa Monica (“City”), a municipal corporation, and West Coast Care Foundation, Inc. (“Consultant”), is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS
A. On or about June 24, 2018, the City and Consultant entered into Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) for homeless outreach services (“Original Agreement”).

B. On or about June 25, 2020, the City and Consultant entered into a First Modification of Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) (“First Modification”) which extended the initial term, modified the City’s option to extend the Original Agreement, and adjusted the compensation paid to Consultant. The Original Agreement and First Modification may be referred to collectively herein as “the Agreement.”
C. On or about February 19, 2021, the City and Consultant entered into a Second Modification of Agreement Number 10684 (CCS) (“Second Modification”) which adjusted the Consultant’s scope of work and compensation paid to Consultant. The Original Agreement, First Modification, and Second Modification may be referred to collectively herein as “the Agreement.” D. The City and Consultant now desire to modify the Agreement further to adjust the current fiscal year’s compensation paid to the Consultant and to amend the scope of services provided to the City.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Now, therefore, the undersigned parties do hereby mutually agree to modify the Original Agreement as follows:

1. Section 2 of the Agreement entitled “Compensation”, as modified by the Second Modification, is hereby deleted, and replaced with the following:

Compensation. The City shall compensate Consultant for the Services performed and provided to City in an amount not to exceed $210,000 during the term of this Agreement and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B-3, Budget. The total compensation paid to Consultant for all services performed and provided to City under this Agreement and any subsequent modification thereto shall not exceed $1,000,000.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 99A027EE-6F63-46AD-BD75-E0E77D5BD931 8/18/2021

ATTACHMENT O
O-28

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24

2. Section 3 of the Original Agreement entitled “Consultant Services” is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

Consultant Services. The Consultant shall perform and provide to City all of the services described in Exhibit A-3, Scope of Services (hereinafter “Services”). The Consultant shall perform and provide the Services to City in accordance with Exhibit B-3, Budget.

3. Exhibit A-1 of the Agreement, as modified by the First Modification, and Exhibit B of the Agreement are superseded by Exhibit A-2 and Exhibit B-2, respectively. Exhibit A-2 and Exhibit B-2 of the Agreement, as modified by the Second Modification, are hereby replaced, and superseded by Exhibit A-3 and Exhibit B-3, respectively. Exhibit A-3 and Exhibit B-3 are attached to this Third Modification and are incorporated into the Original Agreement.

4. Except as expressly modified by this Third Modification, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Modification as of the date and year first written above.

ATTEST:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
a municipal corporation
By:

West Coast Care Foundation
By:

Ron Hooks
DocuSign Envelope ID: 99A027EE-6F63-46AD-BD75-E0E77D5BD931 Interim City Attorney
George S. Cardona
West Coast Care
RH
8/18/2021
John Jalili
Interim City Manager City Clerk
Denise Anderson-Warren

ATTACHMENT O
O-29

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Exhibit A-3
Scope of Services
A. One member of the Consultant team will be available via telephone from 0500 to 2000 each day of the year.

B. Consultant to provide direct homeless outreach services in the field for a total of 25 hours per week or a total of 1,300 hours per year.

C. Consultant to provide daily homeless outreach services within the geographic service area of the City of Santa Monica beach and Pier.

D. Consultant to provide outreach services Monday – Friday at 1100 am at the Blue Gazebo on the Santa Monica Pier.

E. Consultant to develop action plans for at least 250 homeless people per year.

F. Consultant to provide case management and follow-up services for 250 program clients per year. This includes but is not limited to Santa Monica City Attorney emails and telephone calls, conversations and meetings with hospital staff, follow-up with psychiatric services, interacting with Santa Monica Human Services personnel regarding exchange of ideas and information, and follow-up with other social service providers.

G. Consultant to provide monthly activity reports including results of monthly census, log of daily activities or hours worked, number of daily contacts, number of persons temporarily/transitionally sheltered, and number permanently housed, number of family reunifications, hours worked by service provider employees, and other additional information as determined by the program administrator.

H. Consultant to provide detailed, monthly invoices for services provided, including a specific breakdown of salary and benefit costs for all staff, line-item detail of non-salary supplies and expenses, and overhead costs for maintaining communications, transportation, insurance, and facilities.

I. Consultant to provide homeless engagement training to SMFD personnel at least once a year. The training shall be provided for each of the three shifts spread over three days and two different timeslots to accommodate all shifts and 40-hour personnel.

J. Consultant shall work collaboratively with the SMFD’s newly deployed Community Response Unit (CRU) to address homelessness.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 99A027EE-6F63-46AD-BD75-E0E77D5BD931

ATTACHMENT O
O-30

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 Exhibit B-3
Budget
The Consultant shall be compensated for services provided in Exhibit A-3 in an amount not to exceed $150,000 per year for the term of the agreement. Estimated monthly cost is $12,500 and covers salary and benefits, operating costs, overhead to include communications equipment, vehicle and transportation costs, insurance, accounting fees, facilities management, and outreach supplies, such as food gift cards, bus tokens, water, and granola bars.

Effective July 1, 2021 the Consultant shall be compensated an additional $60,000 in onetime City Council authorized funding for staffing costs associated with services provided in Exhibit A-3 for a total amount not to exceed $210,000 for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 term of the agreement.

The total amount of compensation paid to Consultant for the Term of this Agreement shall not exceed $1,000,000.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 99A027EE-6F63-46AD-BD75-E0E77D5BD931

ATTACHMENT O
O-31

12.A.o
Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: West Coast Care Agreement and Modifications (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24

ATTACHMENT P
FY 2021-22 FY 2020-21 FY 2019-20 FY 2018-19
Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation
Typical Annual Allocations
4th of July Parade - Ocean Park Association & City expenses 1 $ 15,000 $ - $ 8,000 $ 7,139 Beautify Earth - - - 20,000
Business Improvement Districts 29,000 29,000 24,000 24,000 Grades for Green - - 30,000 30,000
Santa Monica Arts Parents Association - SAMOHI Orchestra - - 20,000 40,000 Santa Monica Science Magnet - - - 17,000
Scholarship - David B. Finkel Social Justice Scholarship - - 7,500 7,500 Westside Ballet of Santa Monica - - - 15,000
$ 44,000 $ 29,000 $ 89,500 $ 160,639
One-Time Allocations
Black Agenda 25,000 - - -
Brunson Terrace Small Business Marketplace - 25,000 - - Census Outreach - - 25,000 -
Church in Ocean Park for Trans Equity Scholarships - 9,000 - - COAST Event - - - 75,000
DanceEssence - - 3,000 -
Early Childhood Education 20,000 - - -
Election Fees - - 40,000 -
Family Services of Santa Monica 10,000 - - -
Government Alliance on Race and Equity - - 5,000 -
Irish Arts Center - - 10,000 -
LAFLA - Domestic Violence Clinic 10,000 - - -
Latino Cultural Events - 10,000 - -
League of Cities Real Training 12,000 - - -
Meals on Wheels - - 10,000 -
Neighborhood Organizations - 20,000 - -
PAL - Rick Crocker 5K Walk Run Challenge event expenses - 5,000 - - Pico Youth and Family Center Car Show 2
10,000 - - -
Pier Palisades Safety Signage - 10,000 -
Reed Park Ambassador Program - - 150,000 -
Rental Assistance 3
- - 21,535 -
St. Joseph Center YRT & SM Retention 20,000 - - -
Salvation Army - - - 20,000
Santa Monica Chamber Ensemble - - 6,000 -
Santa Monica High School Grad Nite - 10,000 - 1,500
Santa Monica Music Educational Foundation - Mariachi Program - - 19,065 22,000 Santa Monica Pier Lessees' Association Feasibility Study - - - 27,000 Santa Monica Pony League - - 22,000 -
Santa Monica Sister City Foundation - Youth Travel to Sister Cities - - - 25,000 Santa Monica State of the City - - 10,000 -
Santa Monica Symphony Association - - - 15,000
Shopping Cart Tree at Edgemar Center - 5,000 - -
SOULstice Festival - - 17,000 17,000
Streets to Shelter - - - 1,000
Council Discretionary Funds *
June 28, 2022 P-1

12.A.p
Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Council Discretionary Funds [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT P
FY 2021-22 FY 2020-21 FY 2019-20 FY 2018-19
Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation
One-Time Allocations (cont'd)
Tenant Assistance Mailings - 25,000 - -
Virginia Avenue Park Food Pantry 20,000 - - -
Wellbeing Summit - - - 100,000
West Coast Care 10,000 20,000 - -
Westside Coalition for Martin Luther King Jr. Celebration - 9,000 - - Westside Foodbank - - 10,000 -
Wise and Healthy Aging 20,000 - - -
TOTAL ALLOCATIONS $ 192,000 $ 186,000 $ 416,565 $ 464,139 FY 2021-22 Undesignated Council Discretionary Funds $ 67,959 FY 2022-23 Council Discretionary Fund Budget 122,696
Council Discretionary Funds Available $ 190,655
1 FY 2021-22 allocation approved May 24, 2022, Item 13A. Prior year allocations based on actual costs. 2 Reflects a $5,000 allocation approved on August 24, 2021 for the Fall 2021 car show and a $5,000 allocation approved on April 26, 2022 for the Fall 2022 car show. 3 Originally programmed in FY 2017-18 for DACA support. Unspent balance reprogrammed to rental assistance programs in FY 2019-20. * Allocations are reflected in the year first designated and typically spent in that year.

June 28, 2022 P-2

12.A.p
Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Council Discretionary Funds [Revision 1] (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP

ATTACHMENT Q

TAXI RATES
City Council establishes the maximum rates that local taxicab franchisees can charge their customers per SMMC 6.49. Local taxicab rates have remained unchanged since 2011, while the consumer price index has increased by 31 percent. The sole taxi franchisee currently in operation in Santa Monica has requested that rates be increased to maintain their economic viability. Staff is proposing the following increases to the existing rates:
 Base (or “Flag Drop”) fee increased from $2.85 to $3.50  Each 1/9th of a mile fee increased from $0.30 to $0.40  Each 37 seconds of waiting time fee increased from $0.30 to $0.40  Flat rate to LAX
o From North of I-10 increased from $35 to $45
o From South of I-10 increased from $30 to $40
 Flat rate to Hollywood Burbank Airport (formerly Bob Hope Airport) increased from $75 to $95 The following table compares existing and proposed local rates to peer cities. The City of Los Angeles recently implemented an emergency interim increase of 10% to their taxicab rates while working to establish higher new rates.

Year
Established
Base Fee
(Flag Drop)
Each Additional
Mile1
Waiting Time Per
Hour 2
LAX Flat Rate BUR Flat Rate

Santa Monica
(Existing) 2011 $2.85 $2.70 $29.19 North of I-10: $35 South of I-10: $30 $75

Santa Monica
(Proposed) 2022 $3.50 $3.60 $38.92 North of I-10: $45 South of I-10: $40 $95

Los Angeles
(Prior to
Emergency
Increase of
10%)
2011 $2.85 $2.70 $29.19 N/A N/A

Los Angeles
(After
Emergency
Increase of
10%)
2022 $3.10 $2.97 $32.10 N/A N/A

Long Beach ? $2.85 $2.70 $29.19 $60 $105

Beverly Hills 2007 $2.45 $2.45 $26.52 $38 N/A

San Diego 2015 $3.10 $3.30 $27.00 N/A N/A

Seattle ? $2.50 $2.70 $30.00 N/A N/A

Notes:

1 Santa Monica, Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Seattle charge at a rate of 1/9 of a mile. Beverly Hills charges at a rate of 1/7 of a mile.
2 Santa Monica, Los Angeles, and Long Beach charge rate per each 37 seconds. Beverly Hills charges per each 47.5 seconds. Seattle charges per each 36 seconds.

12.A.q
Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Taxi Rates (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 7:14 PM
To: Jason Kligier <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Taxi Fares

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Member,
My name is Sandy Clair and I’ve been a taxi driver for Taxi Taxi in Santa Monica since May 2009. I’m writing to you to ask you to approve the rate increase for taxis on June 28th. In 2011 the cost of a taxi from Santa Monica to Beverly Hills without traffic was approximately $29 on a metered run. The rate is still $29 in 2022 for the same ride. Can you imagine what it's like now to be a taxi driver with gas almost $7 a gallon and all the inflation all these years with no increase in rates whatsoever? Rent, food, clothing and anything you can think of cost more except a taxi ride.

Can you imagine how difficult it is in 2022 for a taxi driver to survive? The increase that we are asking for really doesn’t do justice to the increases we should have had all along but will be helpful. I’m asking you to approve the suggested increase immediately.

Gas was $2.20 a gallon when I started this job 13 years ago and is now almost $7 a gallon but the taxi fares have not increased for the drivers.

The owners cannot attract new drivers because they know they will not be able to earn a living.

Ubers and Lyfts are increasingly becoming more expensive and more unreliable as I’m sure you know.

Please make this change so residences and guests of Santa Monica will still have taxis as a viable option.

Thank you for your time
Respectfully,
Sandy Clair
Taxi Taxi

ATTACHMENT R

12.A.r
Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Public Comment (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) 2021-2022

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Julie Rusk, chair
John Maceri, past chair
Karen Gunn, vice chair
Jody Priselac, vice chair
Natalya Zernitskaya, secretary
Perry Roshan-Zamir, treasurer

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Gary Avrech
Sheila Banani
Tara Baraukas
Claudia Bautista-Nichols
Lindsay Call
Stephanie Cohen
Timothy Conley
Donna Gentry
Ana Maria Jara
Shawn Landres
Ashley London
Janet Gollery McKeithen
Thomas McLaughlin
Jessy Morales
Tara Pomposini
Cynthia Rose
Laura Rosenbaum
Eric Shafer
Cecilia Tovar
Nat Trives
Angel Villaseñor
Michele Wittig
Leila Youssefi
Donald Zelaya

EMERITUS BOARD MEMBERS
Debra Farmer
Misti Kerns
The Human Relations Council of Santa Monica Bay Area is a non-profit organization that promotes a culture of fair treatment, inclusion and equal access to opportunities.

P.O. Box 1307 • Santa Monica, CA 90406 -1307
:hrcsantamonica.org :humanrelationscouncilsantamonicabay June 8, 2022
Re: June 28, 2022 Council Adoption of FY 2022/23 City of Santa Monica Budget Dear Mayor, City Council and City Staff:

The Human Relations Council (HRC) of Santa Monica Bay Area is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of fair treatment, inclusion, and equal access to opportunities. As such, we are deeply committed to equitable, sustained, creative and user-friendly community engagement and public participation. • We appreciate the City Council and staff commitment to greater access for public participation in Council and Board/Commission meetings through your support for “hybrid” meetings and provision of language access services.

This includes call-in and virtual options for public comment and readily available translation and interpretation services, particularly in Spanish and Amharic. We strongly believe that enabling greater public access in these ways is one required step to further the City’s goals of becoming a more equitable and inclusive community.
• We further encourage the City Council to provide the resources needed to support the City staff-created Equity Action Plan designed to ensure increased awareness, action and improved equity outcomes across all City departments.

In summary, we eagerly anticipate implementation progress across all departments on the City’s Equity Action Plan. Genuine and sustained progress on this Plan along with support for those who may not be able to attend in-person meetings and those who may need language support are foundational for a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive Santa Monica for all. When you adopt the FY 2022/23 City budget and department priorities, please adequately fund and restate your priority for this necessary and essential work.

Thank you for your service to the people who live, work and visit Santa Monica.

On Behalf of HRC Board With Kind Regards,
Julie Rusk

ATTACHMENT R

12.A.r
Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Public Comment (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Barbara Jacobson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:01 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Resident Comment for PPL

EXTERNAL
To Santa Monica City Council:

I am a Santa Monica resident and strong advocate of paid parental leave for City Staff and happy to see it on the agenda for June 28, 2022's Council Meeting. However, I want to add that I think there should be more paid leave for people who are physically giving birth to children.

With the six to eight week recovery times associated with Caesarian section births, recovery from body healing, and bonding time for birthing parent and child, I advocate that the fully paid parental leave for birthing parents be expanded from six weeks to 12.

The financial costs associated with birthing parents are high and it is important that the City of Santa Monica continue to be innovative and progressive for working parents in this time of political upheaval.

Thank you for your consideration.

Barbara Jacobson
—
Barbara Jacobson
Linkedin I Twitter
857-919-5695
Item 12.A
06/28/22
1 of 9 Item 12.A
06/28/22

12.A.s
Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Written Comments (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Sandra Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 9:18 PM
To: Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Gleam Davis; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra
Cc: councilmtgitems; sandra smith
Subject: Item 12.A. - Adoption of Year 2 of the FY 2021-23 Biennial Budget, Adoption of the Year 1 and Approval of the Year 2 of the FY 2022-24 Biennial Capital Improvement Program Budget - Santa Monica Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
My letter to the City Council on May 24, regarding the impacts and implications of Projects C0828 and C0468, has remained unanswered. Are we in a dictatorship? An approval of these projects in the upcoming year’s budget, would be setting in motion the closure of the airport without any public debate.

As I previously noted, this absolute lack of transparency is totally unacceptable. A decision with historical restructuring ramifications, impacts all the residents of the city for many years, if not forever. The Council’s respect for the city’s residents in this matter can only be described as non-existent and willfully short sighted.

I again, respectfully and formally, request that Projects C0828 and C0468 be deleted from budget approval.

No actions or contemplation of alternate uses of the airport property should be conducted without an honest and robust discussion with all residents.

A blundering government is a gross violation of public trust.

Ms. Sandy Smith
Santa Monica
Begin forwarded message:

From: Sandra Smith <[email protected]>
Subject: Study Session Item 4.B. Financial Status Update, Attachment B, the Proposed FY 2022-24 Biennial CIP Budget - Santa Monica Airport
Date: May 24, 2022 at 11:22:36 AM PDT
Item 12.A
06/28/22
2 of 9 Item 12.A
06/28/22

12.A.s
Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Written Comments (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) 2 To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], SANDRA SMITH <[email protected]>, sandra smith <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Dear Council Members,
In anticipation of your Study Session Item 4.B. Financial Status Update, Attachment B, the Proposed FY 2022-24 Biennial CIP Budget, I (we) desire clarification regarding the following projects:
 Project C0828 ‐ Airport Conversion Planning ($4,350,000 from FY23 to FY26)  Project C0468 ‐ Airport Reconfiguration ($525,000 from FY23 to FY27) By proposing these significant capital projects at a time when the city is highly cash constrained that are specifically justified as requiring community input and involvement, the projects indicate that (1) the decision to close the airport has been made and (2) the airport will be developed and will not be the open space that was contemplated as the main selling point in passing Measure LC. Needless to say that such city-changing development runs completely counter to ALL voter and resident interests. And, if the airport is to be closed, then why spend any money out of the airport fund? Why would Project C0468 even be contemplated? These funds would represent stranded assets and a complete waste of resources which is unacceptable in this environment. They would best be kept in the airport fund and relinquished to the city once the airport fund is closed when the airport is closed. None of this makes any sense.

That approval for the expenditure of these funds is being requested without informing the voters of what major city-defining decisions that have apparently already been taken, then it’s clear that there is no mandate from the voters to approve, let alone spend, these monies. But more importantly, as the decision to close and develop the airport appears to have been taken without informing the public, who has an absolute right to know. And when is the council thinking of informing the voters of the massive infrastructure, traffic, and potential subsidy costs inherent in such a decision and how such costs are going to be funded?
Let there be no mistake, the apparent decision to close the airport will have been made behind closed doors, and with an outcome that NONE of the voters want. One need only look at the Gelson’s project to understand where the voters stand on development. By not informing the voters of this development decision, the Council is acting not better than the developers who told the residents that since they comply with state law, none of the input matters. That is the experience residents get when dealing with unresponsive interests focused on their own well-being. This kind of treatment is NOT what the voters expect from their elected representatives.

Gelsons’s was only 4.4 acres. When faced with a choice of over 200 acres of similar development at the airport, the voters must have the right to debate and decide on what happens, including leaving the aviation use as is. The voters must have the option to preserve the existing irreplaceable low density land use that provides the critical quality of life throughout Sunset Park as well as prevents the city incurring massive spending liabilities that will burden all the city’s residents for decades to come. The residents just told the Council that they are in no mood for more direct taxes since they clearly rebuffed (by close to 60%!) the notion of a direct parcel tax to fund the libraries. This would generate direct costs and quality of life degradation that are orders of magnitude beyond anything the residents have seen. Frankly, it is why the voters thought they were approving LC – to avoid this exact scenario!
Item 12.A
06/28/22
3 of 9 Item 12.A
06/28/22

12.A.s
Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Written Comments (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) 3 And, if the argument is to be made that a decision has not been taken to development the airport, then why is staff proposing to spend $4.35 million (or more) of very scarce General Fund money on C0828 with the justification that “With local control of the airport set to arrive in 2029, it is imperative that a planning and community outreach process begin as soon as possible.” Just as a reminder to the Council, under Measure LC, the City Council can approve the following uses of the Airport land without voter input:
 Development of parks
 Public open spaces
 Public recreational facilities
 Maintenance and replacement of existing cultural, arts and education uses Clearly, none of this is happening. This is a denial of the residents’ right to be appropriately represented and informed. We would not have expected such a unscrupulous developer-type move from the staff and Council.

This capital budget item should be denied until the decisions that have been reached are presented to the community for proper consideration.

For over thirty years, Santa Monica City has wasted millions on futile legal actions and dead end projects involving the airport. I want to know what decisions have been made and what scenarios are being modeled in the original budget item.

Sincerely, Sandra (by the Beach) Smith
Item 12.A
06/28/22
4 of 9 Item 12.A
06/28/22

12.A.s
Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Written Comments (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) June 27, 2022
Santa Monica City Council
City Hall
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Re: Recommendations to City Council on Human Services Grants Program Budget, RFP, and Funding Human Service Delivery in Santa Monica
Dear Mayor Himmelrich and Council Members:

As members of the City of Santa Monica’s Social Services Commission (SSC), we have spent many months (and some of us, many years) hearing from our community’s most vulnerable citizens about the struggles in their daily lives. We are proud to live in Santa Monica, and we take our responsibilities as Commissioners seriously. We share the concerns of those in our community who rely upon the City’s services, and we hope you are listening to us now.

Annual funding for the city’s Human Services Grant Program’s - $8 million per year – is included in the City’s proposed 2022-2023 Budget. For much of the current year, the Housing and Human Services Division (HHSD) has been developing a new Request for Proposals (RFP) for the provision of local human services, and our Commission has served as a mechanism for city staff to receive community input regarding its design. We have made comments about the RFP that have been addressed, but what concerns us most is that the $8 million in total funds to be distributed each year for the next 3 years remains unchanged from what it has been since 2014. We ask that the City Council reconsider this amount, given not just inflation but also the growing demand for critical City services. An annual increase of 20% is reasonable – and essential – to address our community’s increased challenges in homelessness, behavioral health, and overall social service needs.

While we understand the budgetary constraints the City Council faces, we want to emphasize that the existing City revenues are not the only source of funds. For the past several years, we have urged the City Council to look at its other points of leverage to add to social service funding – including requesting social service benefits be included in development agreements that the city negotiates with real estate, hotel, health care, and tech companies that wish to operate here. In thinking through the options for channeling development dollars into social services, we recommend the city establish a “Human Services Fund” that developers would contribute to, as appropriate, as a condition for developing property within the city’s geographical boundaries, which could serve to augment existing dollars available for social services.

In addition, we are aware that several new proposals will be put before voters in November aimed to generate revenues for certain housing and human services, and regardless of which one(s) get approved, we also see the new funds that will be generated by these measures as new sources of funding for this “Human Services Fund.”
We want to make clear that it is equally important to our Commission that the funds that the City has allocated each year to Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District remain intact. Those funds are Item 12.A
06/28/22
5 of 9 Item 12.A
06/28/22

12.A.s
Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Written Comments (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) essential to continue to reach the children in our city’s school system, which provides a range of essential social service supports to our community’s students and their families.

We applaud the Council for its focus on addressing the considerable needs for those experiencing behavioral health problems and homelessness, two issues that our Commission has highlighted as impacting too many of our citizens. Creating new capacity to address the gaps in behavioral health services is essential, and we are pleased that the City has been negotiating to develop a separate behavioral health funding initiative to address these needs.

After 40 years, our commission is sunsetting at the end of this month, and we take pride in the work that has been done, particularly during COVID these past two years, when we did not miss holding a single meeting. At this critical juncture in the lives of our most needy citizens, we urge you to consider our two primary recommendations: 1) creating a human services fund funded by new sources of revenue as described above; and 2) augmenting by 20% the $8 million in funds available to address the City’s HSD services, which include: basic services for those experiencing homelessness; adults and children struggling with behavioral health problems (mental health and/or substance abuse); early childhood education programs; and services to support senior citizens.

Again, thank you for your commitment to support those children and families in our community who need it most.

Sincerely,
City of Santa Monica Social Services Commission
Winnie Wechsler, Chair
Brian Stedge-Stroud, Vice-Chair
Kay Ambriz
Cindy Akins
Tamara Kagel
Marie Manvel
Bill Parent
Ellen Sloan
Item 12.A
06/28/22
6 of 9 Item 12.A
06/28/22

12.A.s
Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Written Comments (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Sandra Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 11:59 AM
To: Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Gleam Davis; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Re: Item 12.A. - Adoption of Year 2 of the FY 2021-23 Biennial Budget, Adoption of the Year 1 and Approval of the Year 2 of the FY 2022-24 Biennial Capital Improvement Program Budget - Santa Monica Airport

EXTERNAL
On Jun 27, 2022, at 9:17 PM, Sandra Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Santa Monica City Council,
My letter to the City Council on May 24, regarding the impacts and implications of Projects C0828 and C0468, has remained unanswered. Are we in a dictatorship?
An approval of these projects in the upcoming year’s budget, would be setting in motion the closure of the airport without any public debate.

As I previously noted, this absolute lack of transparency is totally unacceptable. A decision with historical restructuring ramifications, impacts all the residents of the city for many years, if not forever. The Council’s respect for the city’s residents in this matter can only be described as non-existent and willfully short sighted.

I again, respectfully and formally, request that Projects C0828 and C0468 be deleted from budget approval.

No actions or contemplation of alternate uses of the airport property should be conducted without an honest and robust discussion with all residents.

A blundering government is a gross violation of public trust.

Ms. Sandy Smith
Santa Monica
Item 12.A
06/28/22
7 of 9 Item 12.A
06/28/22

12.A.s
Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Written Comments (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) 2 Begin forwarded message:

From: Sandra Smith <[email protected]>
Subject: Study Session Item 4.B. Financial Status Update, Attachment B, the Proposed FY 2022-24 Biennial CIP Budget - Santa Monica Airport
Date: May 24, 2022 at 11:22:36 AM PDT
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], SANDRA SMITH <[email protected]>, sandra smith <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Dear Council Members,
In anticipation of your Study Session Item 4.B. Financial Status Update, Attachment B, the Proposed FY 2022-24 Biennial CIP Budget, I (we) desire clarification regarding the following projects:
 Project C0828 ‐ Airport Conversion Planning ($4,350,000 from FY23 to FY26)  Project C0468 ‐ Airport Reconfiguration ($525,000 from FY23 to FY27) By proposing these significant capital projects at a time when the city is highly cash constrained that are specifically justified as requiring community input and involvement, the projects indicate that (1) the decision to close the airport has been made and (2) the airport will be developed and will not be the open space that was contemplated as the main selling point in passing Measure LC. Needless to say that such city-changing development runs completely counter to ALL voter and resident interests. And, if the airport is to be closed, then why spend any money out of the airport fund? Why would Project C0468 even be contemplated? These funds would represent stranded assets and a complete waste of resources which is unacceptable in this environment. They would best be kept in the airport fund and relinquished to the city once the airport fund is closed when the airport is closed. None of this makes any sense.

That approval for the expenditure of these funds is being requested without informing the voters of what major city-defining decisions that have apparently already been taken, then it’s clear that there is no mandate from the voters to approve, let alone spend, these monies. But more importantly, as the decision to close and develop the airport appears to have been taken without informing the public, who has an absolute right to know. And when is the council thinking of informing the voters of the massive infrastructure, traffic, and potential subsidy costs inherent in such a decision and how such costs are going to be funded?
Let there be no mistake, the apparent decision to close the airport will have been made behind closed doors, and with an outcome that NONE of the voters want. One need only look at the Gelson’s project to understand where the voters stand on development. By not informing the voters of this development decision, the Council is acting not better than the developers who told the residents that since they comply with state law, none of the input matters. That is the experience residents get when dealing with unresponsive interests focused on their own well-being. This kind of treatment is NOT what the voters expect from their elected representatives.

Item 12.A
06/28/22
8 of 9 Item 12.A
06/28/22

12.A.s
Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Written Comments (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) 3 Gelsons’s was only 4.4 acres. When faced with a choice of over 200 acres of similar development at the airport, the voters must have the right to debate and decide on what happens, including leaving the aviation use as is. The voters must have the option to preserve the existing irreplaceable low density land use that provides the critical quality of life throughout Sunset Park as well as prevents the city incurring massive spending liabilities that will burden all the city’s residents for decades to come. The residents just told the Council that they are in no mood for more direct taxes since they clearly rebuffed (by close to 60%!) the notion of a direct parcel tax to fund the libraries. This would generate direct costs and quality of life degradation that are orders of magnitude beyond anything the residents have seen. Frankly, it is why the voters thought they were approving LC – to avoid this exact scenario!
And, if the argument is to be made that a decision has not been taken to development the airport, then why is staff proposing to spend $4.35 million (or more) of very scarce General Fund money on C0828 with the justification that “With local control of the airport set to arrive in 2029, it is imperative that a planning and community outreach process begin as soon as possible.”
Just as a reminder to the Council, under Measure LC, the City Council can approve the following uses of the Airport land without voter input:
 Development of parks
 Public open spaces
 Public recreational facilities
 Maintenance and replacement of existing cultural, arts and education uses Clearly, none of this is happening. This is a denial of the residents’ right to be appropriately represented and informed. We would not have expected such a unscrupulous developer-type move from the staff and Council.

This capital budget item should be denied until the decisions that have been reached are presented to the community for proper consideration.

For over thirty years, Santa Monica City has wasted millions on futile legal actions and dead end projects involving the airport. I want to know what decisions have been made and what scenarios are being modeled in the original budget item.

Sincerely, Sandra (by the Beach) Smith
Item 12.A
06/28/22
9 of 9 Item 12.A
06/28/22

12.A.s
Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Written Comments (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget and Approval of 2023-24 CIP Budget) City Council – June 28, 2022
FY 2022-23 Budget Adoption

12.A.t
Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP The Biennial Budget
Operating Budget
• FY 2021-23 Biennial
• Adopting Year 2 FY22-
23 2
Capital Budget
• FY 2022-24 Biennial
• Adopting Year 1 FY22-23
• Approving Year 2 FY23-
24 12.A.t
Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget Overview
• Balanced Budget
• Measured expansion
• Focused on community priorities and enabling
in-person services
3 12.A.t
Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Highlights of Restored City Services
4 Support services as they reopened
• In-person services at Main Library and branches, Permitting, Youth and Recreation programs, Beach House
Safe & Clean
• Personal protective equipment (PPE), Health restriction compliance, Trash collection, Downtown safety deployment, Pier Vending Task Force
Homelessness and prevention
• Therapeutic van and Community Response Unit, Multi-disciplinary street teams, Tenant counseling, Homeless services delivery audit
Economic Recovery
• Outdoor dining, Rent abatement, Stipends and emergency assistance, Event grants, Trades Intern Program, Literacy and youth programming at libraries
Furthering progress based on values
• Racial equity, language justice, affordable housing, 311

12.A.t
Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP • Directed Action Response Team (previously Pier Vending Task Force) • Volunteer Coordinator
• Customer Service (311)
• Partnerships
• Permitting and Park Planning
• Business License outreach and compliance
• Multi-modal Mobility Network
• Facility Maintenance
• Aquatics
• Public Safety Officer Program
• Fire Inspections
General Fund Enhanced Services in May Proposed Budget

12.A.t
Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget Overview – FY 2022-23 Proposed Budget
6 Citywide Expenditures - $665.3 million*
• Total FTEs:
• 1,945.5 Permanent
• 79.8 As-needed
General Fund - $394.0 million
• Total FTEs:
• 1,217.8 Permanent
• 68.3 As-needed
Final Changes
• +$533,00 in Operating Expenses
o $464,000 to General Fund
o $69,000 to Misc. Grants Fund
• + 0.5 FTE Permanent Position
*Citywide expenditures are net of reimbursements and transfers between funds $88.4
$13.8
$576.8
$380.2
$665.3
$394.0
$-
$100.0
$200.0
$300.0
$400.0
$500.0
$600.0
$700.0
Citywide* General Fund
Operating
Capital
(in millions)

12.A.t
Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Council Input – Final Changes to Proposed Budget
The Final Changes are responsive to the community needs identified in the Budget Study Session:
• Restoration of Sports Fields (one-time)
• Remove fencing at Clover Park's main field in spring 2023 • Restore Memorial Park's main field, Clover Park's extension field, and Los Amigos Park's field
• Youth Programming (one-time)
• Supervised Afterschool Playtime at all seven elementary schools • Economic Recovery
• New Parklets Program
• Add 0.5 FTE Public Works Inspector supported by new revenues 7 12.A.t
Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Other Items
Master Fee, Fine, Parking
Rate Resolutions
Resolutions to Accept/Use
State and Federal Funds
West Coast Care Contract
Extension
8 Paid Parental Leave
• 6 weeks at 100% salary
• Within 12 months following
birth, adoption, placement of a
child
• Effective July 1, 2022
• 12 months with City to be
eligible

12.A.t
Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Budget Timeline
• Budget Study Session (May 2022)
• Budget Adoption (June 2022)
• Year-End Budget Review (October 2022)
• Midyear Budget Review and Forecast (February 2023)
• Biennial Budget Study Session(s) (May 2023)
• Biennial Budget Adoption (June 2023)
9 12.A.t
Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP Recommended Actions
Adopt Resolutions:
• Adopt the FY 2022-23 Operating Budget, adopt the first year and approve the second year of the FY 2022-24 Biennial Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget
• Revisions to the master fee schedule and master fine schedule • Establish parking rates and permit fees for all City parking facilities • Establish new or revise existing classifications and salary rates • Establish Gann appropriations limit
• Incorporate a project funded by SB 1: The Road Repair & Accountability Act Approve:
• Position and classification changes
• New Paid Parental Leave policy
Accept:
• Federal Continuum of Care Program renewal grant funds • US Department of Justice (DOJ) grant awards
Authorize:
• Contract modifications with West Coast Care Foundation • Execution of documents to accept two grant awards from US Department of Justice • Execution of MOU with Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District to provide supervised afterschool playtime Council Discretionary Funds:
• Direction on any discretionary fund allocations 10

12.A.t
Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4755 : Adoption of FY2022-23 Operating and CIP City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: June 28, 2022
Agenda Item: 16.A
1 of 2
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Annual Appointments to the following Boards and Commissions:

Board/Commission No. of
Seats
Term
End Date
Special Requirements
Airport Commission 1 6/30/2026
Architectural Review Board 2 6/30/2026 At least one shall be a professional licensed architect.

Arts Commission 2 6/30/2026 Reside or work in
Santa Monica
Commission on Sustainability,
Environmental Justice and the
Environment
2 6/30/2026
Disabilities Commission 3 6/30/2026
At least two must be selfidentified persons with a
disability.

Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. 3 6/30/2026
Shall be City residents or
persons who are employed,
own property or hold
business licenses in the
City of Santa Monica.

Housing Commission 2 6/30/2026
Landmarks Commission 3 6/30/2026
At least one must be a local
historian and one an
architectural historian.

Personnel Board 1 6/30/2027
Planning Commission 1 6/30/2026
Public Safety Reform and Oversight
Commission 2 6/30/2026
Recreation and Parks Commission 2 6/30/2026

16.A
Packet Pg. 695
2 of 2
Santa Monica Library Board 2 6/30/2026
Santa Monica Travel & Tourism, Inc. 3 6/30/2026
Shall be from Santa Monica's
community and business
leadership.

Prepared By: Esterlina Lugo, Deputy City Clerk
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Annual Applicant Lists_2022
B. ADD-TO: Boards and Commissions Voluntary Self Identification Form C. Written Comments

16.A
Packet Pg. 696
Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Airport Commission
Name Application Date
Margaret Falk 5/25/2022
Eve Lopez 1/23/2022
Marie Manvel 5/19/2022
Diane P. Reynolds 6/06/2022
Kate Scott 5/22/2022
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 5
*Incumbents list in red

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Architectural Review Board
Name Application Date
Kevin Daly 6/21/2022
Patrick Tighe 6/14/2021
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 1
*Incumbents listed in red
*Currently Serving on the Building
and Fire-Life Safety Commission

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Arts Commission
Name Application Date
Kara Fox 7/19/2021
Federico Galavis 2/03/2022
Marie Manvel 5/19/2022
Mary-Elizabeth Michaels 6/20/2022
Bren C. Petrakos 6/21/2022
Jeff Swimmer 5/10/2021
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 5
*Incumbents listed in red

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Board and Commissions Applicants
Commission on Sustainability, Environmental
Justice and the Environment
Name Application Date
Robert J. Lempert 6/19/2022
Erik Neandross 6/10/2022
Alexandra Tower 5/11/2021
Ashley Olsen 11/18/2021
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 4
*Incumbents listed in red

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/08/22 at 10pm
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Disabilities Commission
Name Application Date
Joseph Antognini 3/22/2022
Alexandra Blanc 4/04/2022
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 2
*Identified person with a disability
*Incumbents listed in red

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Board and Commissions Applicants
Downtown Santa Monica, Inc.

Name Application Date
Kim Blide 5/20/2022
Luke M. Cain 5/12/2022
John Given 5/27/2022
Ryan O Hass 12/06/2021
Kurt Isensee 1/03/2022
Marie Manvel 5/19/2022
Juan Matute 6/09/2022
Leonid Pustilnikov 5/10/2022
Kevin Simon 6/20/2022
Lucian Tudor 5/25/2022
Barry Snell 09/01/2020
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 10
*Incumbent listed in red.

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Housing Commission
Name Application Date
Desmond Borresen 11/30/2021
Leonora S. Camner 6/15/2022
Kate Evarts 11/29/2021
Lydia Garcia 11/30/2021
Edmund Ha 11/30/2021
Ryan Hass 12/06/2021
Michael Jolly 12/06/2021
Marie Manvel 5/19/2022
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 8
*Incumbent listed in red.

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Landmarks Commission
Name Application Date
Paddy Calistro McAuley 7/19/2021
Roger Genser 6/21/2022
Marie Manvel 5/19/2022
Dolores Sloan 6/08/2022
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 4
*Incumbents listed in red
*Currently Serving on the Urban
Forest Task Force

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Personnel Board
Name Application Date
Marie Manvel 5/19/2022
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 1
*Incumbents listed in red

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Board and Commissions Applicants
Planning Commission
Name Application Date
Josh D. Hamilton 2/24/2022
Marie Manvel 5/19/2022
Shawn Landres 6/20/2022
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 3
*Incumbents listed in red
*Currently Serving on the Building
Fire-Life Safety Commission and not
a Santa Monica Resident

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Public Safety Reform and Oversight Commission
Name Application Date
Xavier H. Banister 3/07/2022
Jason Feldman 3/15/2021
Albin Gielicz 3/19/2021
Stuart B. Graber 6/05/2022
Lucas Kolding 3/02/2022
Craig R. Miller 6/19/2022
Joseph Palazzolo 5/02/2022
Donald Singer 4/16/2021
Brian Stedge-Stroud 5/21/2022
Craig A. Walter 3/10/2022
Paul Winnemore 3/24/2022 re-applied
Michele Wittig 11/30/2021
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 12
*Meets 18-22 years old requirement.

TOL APPICANTS THAT MEET REQUI4
*Incumbents listed in red
*Currently Serving on Recreation
and Parks Commission
*Meets 18-22 years old requirement.
*Meets 18-22 years old requirement
but not a Santa Monica resident.

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Recreation and Parks Commission
Name Application Date
Sean Besser 6/21/2022
Andrew Gomez 6/08/2022
Steven Johnson 5/28/2021
Mei Lisa D. Thompson 6/20/2022
John Cyrus Smith 6/21/2022
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 5
*Incumbents listed in red

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Santa Monica Library Board
Name Application Date
Daniel Cody 6/14/2022
Nick Flaig 2/3/2022
Ali Garshasbi 2/7/2022
Ralinda Harvey Smith 2/3/2022
Dan Hugh-Jones 10/13/2021
Judith Meister 6/18/2022
Dana Newman 3/18/2022
Deborah Tuckman 1/31/2022
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 8
*Incumbents listed in red

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) Revised 6/24/22 at 7pm
City of Santa Monica
Board and Commissions Applicants
Santa Monica Travel and Tourism, Inc.

Name Application Date
Judi Barker 6/23/2022 LATE APPLICATION
Kara Blades-Snell 3/29/2022
Darlene Evans 5/15/2022
Ryan Hass 5/25/2021
Marie Manvel 5/19/2022
Kara Taub 6/23/2022 LATE APPLICATION
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 6
*Incumbents listed in red

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Annual Applicant Lists_2022 (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) City of Santa Monica Boards and Commissions Voluntary Self Identification Form
 Forms(https://www.office.com/launch/forms?auth=2&from=FormsDomain)  NN 52 Responses
85:38
Average time to complete
Closed
Status

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: ADD-TO: Boards and Commissions Voluntary Self Identification Form (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins))

1. What board or commission do you currently serve on:

2. What is your current position?
Airport Commission1
Architectural Review Board0
Arts Commission2
Audit Subcommittee0
Building and Fire-Life Safety C
…
3 Clean Beaches & Ocean Parcel
…
3 Commission for the Senior Co
…
0 Commission on Sustainability,
…
3 Commission on the Status of
…
0 Disabilities Commission5
Downtown Santa Monica, Inc.2
Housing Commission4
LA County West Vector Contro
…
0 Landmarks Commission3
Metropolitan Water District2
Personnel Board4
Planning Commission3
Public Safety Reform and Over
…
6 Recreation and Parks Commis
…
1 Santa Monica Library Board3
Santa Monica Pier Corp.1
Santa Monica Travel and Touri
…
5 Social Services Commission0
Urban Forest Task Force1
Chair 10
Vice Chair5
Member 36

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: ADD-TO: Boards and Commissions Voluntary Self Identification Form (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins))

3. What is your current gender identity?

4. Are you transgender?

5. What is your sexual orientation?
Male 26
Female 23
Non-binary2
I do not wish to disclose0
Other1
Yes0
No 49
I do not wish to disclose2
Asexual1
Bisexual1
Gay3
Heterosexual or straight  33
Lesbian 2
Pansexual1
Queer1
I do not wish to disclose 9
Other0

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: ADD-TO: Boards and Commissions Voluntary Self Identification Form (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins))

6. Race/Ethnicity: (Please check all the descriptions below corresponding to the ethnic group(s) with which you identify.)

7. Age Group

8. What is your highest level of education?
Hispanic or Latino: A person o… 4
White (Not Hispanic or Latino)… 39
Black or African American (No… 4
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Isla… 0
Asian (Not Hispanic or Latino):… 3
Native American or Alaska Na… 2
I do not wish to disclose 4
18-30 1
31-40 7
41-50 11
51-60 10
61-70 8
71+ 10
I do not wish to disclose 5
High School 0
Trade School 1
Some College 3
College 15
Graduate/Professional Degree 33
Other 0
I do not wish to disclose 0

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: ADD-TO: Boards and Commissions Voluntary Self Identification Form (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins))

9. Employment Status:

10. What is your level of income?
Employed  24
Self-Employed 10
Unemployed1
Stay at home parent/homema
…
0 Student0
Active Military 0
Retired 10
Unable to work/Disabled4
Volunteer0
I do not wish to disclose3
Below $25,0006
$25,001-$50,0001
$50,001-$100,000 10
$100,001-$200,000 14
$200,001-$300,0002
$300,001-$400,0001
$400,001-$500,0001
$500,001+0
I do not wish to disclose 17

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: ADD-TO: Boards and Commissions Voluntary Self Identification Form (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins))

11. What is your marital status?

12. How many children do you have?

13. Primary language(s) spoken at home:

14.Religious Affiliation(s):

Single, never married8
Married or domestic partners
… 31
Widowed1
Divorced 8
Separated 0
I do not wish to disclose4
None 17 1 12
2-4 15
More than 43
I do not wish to disclose4
Latest Responses
"English "
"english"
"English"
50 Responses
Latest Responses
"Christian "
"None"
40 Responses

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: ADD-TO: Boards and Commissions Voluntary Self Identification Form (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins))

15. Would you consider yourself to have a disability?

16. Do you identify as having military or veteran status?

17. Which Santa Monica neighborhood do you reside in? To view a map of the neighborhoods refer to https://csmgisweb.smgov.net/docs/mapcatalog/neighborhoods.pdf.

Yes 9
No 35
I do not wish to disclose 7
Yes 6
No 43
I do not wish to disclose 1
Sunset Park Neighborhood 7
North of Montana Neighborh… 7
Ocean Park Neighborhood 6
Pico Neighborhood 8
Mid City Neighborhood 5
Northeast Neighborhood 2
Wilshire Montana Neighborho… 12
Downtown Area 2
I do not live in Santa Monica 3

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: ADD-TO: Boards and Commissions Voluntary Self Identification Form (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Karen Stern <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 8:40 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: June 28 Agenda Item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear SM City Council Members:

I wholeheartedly endorse Sunset Park resident Diane Reynolds' application to serve as an SMO Airport Commissioner and strongly encourage the Santa Monica City Council to appoint her to a four‐year term.

As a representative of our neighborhood, Diane will hold community interests in mind during the critical next four years at SMO. Diane is dedicated to mitigating SMO health impacts, promoting sustainable current uses such as a planned expansion of Airport Park, and actively supporting the Commission and SM City Council in preparing SMO for a successful return to local control in 2029.

Sincerely,
Karen Stern
________________________________________________________ Item 16.A
06/28/22
1 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: Robb Curtis Brown <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 6:55 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: June 28 Agenda item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
I am writing to resoundingly, wholeheartedly endorse DIANE REYNOLDS for a 4 year appointment to the Airport Commission.  Diane is smart, organized, a great listener and passionate about the future of SMO.  She will be an outstanding commissioner and a huge asset to the Commission moving into this critical period. 100%, without qualification or reservation.

Robert Brown
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16.A
06/28/22
2 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 Vernice Hankins
From: Scotty Weber <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2022 8:57 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; [email protected]; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. -- Jane 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I am writing to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only airport commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds, do not meet the basic needs that the commission currently has ‐‐ which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city's 25 boards and commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Scotty Weber
Assistant Chief Flight Instructor, Santa Monica Flyers (Santa Monica Airport ‐ KSMO) Resident of Santa Monica
Item 16.A
06/28/22
3 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 4 Vernice Hankins
From: Carly Anderson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2022 8:56 PM
To: Christine Parra; Gleam Davis; Kristin McCowan; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock; Sue Himmelrich; councilmtgitems
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Carly Rae Anderson
Item 16.A
06/28/22
4 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 5 Vernice Hankins
From: Tricia Crane <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2022 5:35 PM
To: Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Oscar de la Torre; Gleam Davis; councilmtgitems; David White; Susan Cline; Anuj Gupta Subject: Agenda Item 16.A June 28, 2022 - Support appointment of 3 new Stakeholders to the Board of Downtown Santa Monica, Inc (DTSM)

EXTERNAL
To: Santa Monica City Council
From: The Board of Northeast Neighbors
Re: Support appointment of 3 new Stakeholders to the Board of Downtown Santa Monica, Inc (DTSM) Agenda Item 16.A. 6/28/2022
Dear City Council,
The Board of Northeast Neighbors writes to request that City Council appoint the following three stakeholder applicants onto the Board of Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. (DTSM):
 Leonid (Leo) Pustilnikov – Owner of the AMC on the Promenade  Luke M. Cain – Owner of Britannia Pub on 4th Street
 Lucian Tudor – Owner of the 1212 Restaurant on the Promenade Tuesday’s Council meeting affords the Council with an opportunity to appoint these local members of the downtown business community as needed new leadership to address the ongoing devastation of Downtown and the Third Street Promenade.

Downtown and the Promenade are large revenue-generating opportunities for our city that have been neglected by the current DTSM board. The current DTSM board’s promotion of “Promenade 3.0” revitalization plan has been an utter failure for the Promenade, which has more than 60% vacancies.

Visitors to our City are stunned by the sad state of the Promenade, once a beloved destination for residents and tourists alike.

The City Council should appoint these three highly motivated and invested representatives of the downtown business community to DTSM and allow them to bring back our commercial core. We need new leadership to accomplish the DTSM Mission Statement and goal of “driving awareness to maintain and strengthen the District’s reputation, identity and overall appeal to ensure its continued success.”
Item 16.A
06/28/22
5 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 6 Thank you
Sincerely,
The Board of Northeast Neighbors

Item 16.A
06/28/22
6 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: connie schurr <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 1:05 PM
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a nontechnical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

As a part-time employee of Eco-Aviation, I believe the Airport Commission needs a commissioner that has the best interest of the airport in mind. Eve Lopez is a resident of Sunset Park and a pilot and would be an excellent Airport Commissioner.

Sincerely,
Connie Schurr
PO 2682
Malibu, CA 90265
310 309-0500
Item 16.A
06/28/22
7 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: Mark Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 1:04 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Airport, Drones, Safety and Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
Please appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  She is a long term Sunset Park resident.

She would be the only Airport Commissioner to have first hand technical knowledge of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would be in line with Council values.

The Santa Monica Police department is flying drones over our City with a woman as the safety pilot. This is the future of aviation. (pictures attached)
Currently there is a commercial tenant at the airport operating in a less than prudent manner. The Airport Commission has no idea since they are not pilots and never set a foot on the airport and have no pragmatic interest in aviation safety.

Why is there is not a woman on the airport commission or anyone with current aviation experience? We have white men with zero vision for safety, electric aviation and are spinning a yarn of myths. They waste our City Staffresources with baseless projects that accomplish nothing but waste money.

In 2011, The Airport Commission spent $70,000 with Rand on a consultant
brief  https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/documented_briefings/2012/RAND_DB639.pdf This was a waste of money since the Airport Commission did not like the findings of the brief and lambasted the authors. The Rand report suggested the airport land had multitude of long term values if properly managed
Item 16.A
06/28/22
8 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 We need a balanced Airport Commission to spend money in an ethical manner and have a flow of information that is of value to everyone.

There is zero down side to adding a woman pilot who has current aviation experience to the airport commission. The upside, we would have a safer and quieter airport.

I am a 25 year resident, contractor with the city, tenant of the city and have installed over 300 solar and battery back up systems in Santa Monica. I have over forty years of worldwide aviation experience including military and commercial operations. Please balance this commission. The current Airport Commission is remarkably uninformed and has done nothing to support safety or address noise issues.

Eve Lopez would be an asset to the entire community and provide an insight that would fill the unethical void that now exists.

Sincerely,
Mark Smith
(310) 213 0790
www.solarforward.com
The content of this email and any files attached are confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message, email or files, with any third party, without a written consent of the sender.

If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion.. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding.

Item 16.A
06/28/22
9 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 4 Item 16.A
06/28/22
10 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 5 Item 16.A
06/28/22
11 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 6 Vernice Hankins
From: Dika Chartoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 6:34 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: June 28th Agenda Item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear SM City Council Members:

I wholeheartedly endorse Sunset Park resident Diane Reynolds' application to serve as an SMO Airport Commissioner and strongly encourage the Santa Monica City Council to appoint her to a four‐year term.

As a representative of our neighborhood, Diane will hold community interests in mind during the critical next four years at SMO. Diane is dedicated to mitigating SMO health impacts, promoting sustainable current uses such as a planned expansion of Airport Park, and actively supporting the Commission and SM City Council in preparing SMO for a successful return to local control in 2029.

Sent from my iPhone
Item 16.A
06/28/22
12 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 7 Vernice Hankins
From: Jennifer Polhemus <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 11:51 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Oscar de la Torre; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra
Subject: City Council 6-28 agenda item #16 -- Airport Commission appointment

EXTERNAL
Councilmembers,
I urge you to appoint Santa Monica resident Diane Reynolds, MFT to the Airport Commission.

I have known Diane for almost two decades. She is a smart, responsible, and balanced woman with significant knowledge about airport issues.

We would be fortunate to have her in such a position.

Jennifer Polhemus
40‐year resident & Santa Monica business owner
32nd Street
[email protected]
Item 16.A
06/28/22
13 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 8 Vernice Hankins
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 9:47 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Oscar de la Torre; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: City Council 6-28 agenda item #16 -- Airport Commission appointment

EXTERNAL
************************************************************************** June 26, 2022

To: Mayor Himmelrich and City Council members

From: Zina Josephs

RE: 6/28/22 agenda item #16: Airport Commission appointment

I urge the Council to appoint Diane Reynolds to the Airport Commission.

As resident and community stakeholder in Sunset Park for 25 years, Diane has been an active volunteer. Her two children, Eli and Emily Brown, attended SMMUSD schools, and she volunteered with the school district and with the PTA.

In 2008, she canvassed for the SMMUSD Measure R parcel tax, which combined and replaced the previous Measures Y and S parcel taxes, contained a CPI-U adjustment, and included a senior exemption.

In 2014, Diane was an active volunteer with the successful community effort to pass Measure LC -- “It’s Our Land” -- https://itsourland.org/ -- https://2014.smvote.org/BallotMeasures/ -- Item 16.A
06/28/22
14 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 9 “Shall the City Charter be amended to:
(1) prohibit new development on Airport land, except for parks, public open spaces and public recreational facilities, until the voters approve limits on the uses and development that may occur on the land; and (2) affirm the City Council's authority to manage the Airport and to close all or part of it?”

In 2020, she was invited by Peter James to serve on a working group regarding the relocation of the Public Landscape Maintenance Division.

Diane also organized her local Neighborhood Watch group.

As the child of an Alaskan bush pilot and someone who has lived near Santa Monica Airport for many years, she would follow in the footsteps of Susan Hartley and Dr. Suzanne Paulson -- Sunset Park residents who previously served on the Airport Commission.

As a Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist for 25 years, Diane consults with First5-LA, Connections for Children, and the L.A. County Department of Mental Health.

Her skills in organizing, providing education and training, helping teams navigate complex issues, and welcoming all voices in building the future would be very helpful on the Airport Commission.

She could support the Commission’s efforts to mitigate health impacts from the airport, promote sustainable uses, and prepare for the airport’s closure in 2029.

There are currently two pilots and an attorney on the Commission:

Joe Schmitz -- Retired Air Force Major, aviation safety expert, former university professor, PhD from the USC Annenberg School for Communication
Bruce Malarky -- Instrument-rated commercial pilot, with 25 years of experience as an Army flight instructor, currently employed as an engineer at Boeing

Item 16.A
06/28/22
15 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 10 Geoff Neri – Attorney, former federal appellate law clerk, with substantial trial and appellate litigation experience in both state and federal courts
Diane’s skills would complement theirs.

Again, I urge the Council to appoint Diane Reynolds to the Airport Commission.

Thank you for your consideration.

Zina Josephs
Item 16.A
06/28/22
16 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Jamie Dunham <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 3:17 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: June 28 Agenda Item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear SM City Council Members:

I am wholeheartedly endorsing Sunset Park resident Diane Reynolds' application to serve as an SMO Airport Commissioner and strongly encourage the Santa Monica City Council to appoint her to a four‐year term.

We live on the same street as Diane, who has been an advocate for improving not only our street, but the entire Santa Monica community.

As a representative of our local and extended neighborhoods, Diane will hold community interests in mind during the critical next four years at SMO. Diane is dedicated to mitigating SMO health impacts, promoting sustainable current uses such as a planned expansion of Airport Park, and actively supporting the Commission and SM City Council in preparing SMO for a successful return to local control in 2029.

Thank you,
Jamie Dunham
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Item 16.A
06/28/22
17 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: Danielle Charney <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 2:20 PM
To: Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Oscar de la Torre; Gleam Davis; councilmtgitems; David White
Subject: Subject: Agenda Item 16.A June 28, 2022 - Support appointment of 3 new Stakeholders to the Board of Downtown Santa Monica, Inc (DTSM)

EXTERNAL
I second this letter from Tricia Crane- Something's Gotta Give..

To: Santa Monica City Council
Re: Support appointment of 3 new Stakeholders to the Board of Downtown Santa Monica, Inc (DTSM) Agenda Item 16.A. 6/28/2022
Dear City Council,
The Board of Northeast Neighbors writes to request that City Council appoint the following three stakeholder applicants onto the Board of Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. (DTSM):
 Leonid (Leo) Pustilnikov – Owner of the AMC on the Promenade  Luke M. Cain – Owner of Britannia Pub on 4th Street
 Lucian Tudor – Owner of the 1212 Restaurant on the Promenade Tuesday’s Council meeting affords the Council with an opportunity to appoint these local members of the downtown business community as needed new leadership to address the ongoing devastation of Downtown and the Third Street Promenade.

Downtown and the Promenade are large revenue-generating opportunities for our city that have been neglected by the current DTSM board. The current DTSM board’s promotion of “Promenade 3.0” revitalization plan has been an utter failure for the Promenade, which has more than 60% vacancies.

Visitors to our City are stunned by the sad state of the Promenade, once a beloved destination for residents and tourists alike.

The City Council should appoint these three highly motivated and invested representatives of the downtown business community to DTSM and allow them to bring back our commercial core. We need new leadership to accomplish the DTSM Mission Statement and goal of “driving awareness to maintain and strengthen the District’s reputation, identity and overall appeal to ensure its continued success.”
Thank you
Item 16.A
06/28/22
18 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 Sincerely,
Danielle Charney
Resident of Ocean Park for 40 years
Item 16.A
06/28/22
19 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 4 Vernice Hankins
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 1:52 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Christine Parra; Gleam Davis; Kristin McCowan; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock; Sue Himmelrich
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: City Council 6/28 agenda item 16-A -- Downtown Santa Monica Inc. appointments

EXTERNAL
June 26, 2022

To: Mayor Himmelrich and City Council members

From: Zina Josephs

RE: 6/28 agenda item 16-A: Downtown Santa Monica Inc. appointments I support the following candidates for the DTSM Inc. Board:

1) Luke Cain -- Britannia Pub at 318 Santa Monica Blvd. -- he majored in strategic communications in college -- https://www.britanniapub.com 2) Lucian Tudor -- 1212 Santa Monica restaurant on the Promenade -- https://1212santamonica.com/
3) Leo Pustilnikov -- AMC Santa Monica 7 movie theater at 1310 3rd Street (on the Promenade at Arizona) -- https://www.amctheatres.com/movie-theatres/los-angeles/amcsanta-monica-7 Thank you for your consideration.

Item 16.A
06/28/22
20 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 5 Vernice Hankins
From: Martin L Chenevert <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 1:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: June 28 Agenda Item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear SM City Council Members:

I have been a resident of Ocean Park for 28 years and have long followed the status of the SMO Airport. I have known Sunset Park resident Diane Reynolds for at least 15 years as we both raised musicians in the SMMUSD music program. I wholeheartedly endorse Diane’s application to serve as an SMO Airport Commissioner and strongly encourage the Santa Monica City Council to appoint her to a four‐year term.

As a representative of our neighborhood, Diane will hold community interests in mind during the critical next four years at SMO. Diane is dedicated to mitigating SMO health impacts, promoting sustainable current uses such as a planned expansion of Airport Park, and actively supporting the Commission and SM City Council in preparing SMO for a successful return to local control in 2029.

Martin Chenevert, MD
Item 16.A
06/28/22
21 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 6 Vernice Hankins
From: Asa Greenberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 1:06 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: ICE Natalie Atun
Subject: June 28 Agenda Item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear SM City Council Members:

I wholeheartedly endorse Sunset Park resident Diane Reynolds' application to serve as an SMO Airport Commissioner and strongly encourage the Santa Monica City Council to appoint her to a four‐year term.

As a representative of our neighborhood, Diane will hold community interests in mind during the critical next four years at SMO. Diane is dedicated to mitigating SMO health impacts, promoting sustainable current uses such as a planned expansion of Airport Park, and actively supporting the Commission and SM City Council in preparing SMO for a successful return to local control in 2029.

Sincerely,
Asa and Natalie Greenberg
2315 Pier Ave
Santa Monica CA 90405
_
Asa Greenberg
Argonaut Pictures, LLC
[email protected]
Item 16.A
06/28/22
22 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Cherish Stephens <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2022 9:05 PM
To: Lana Negrete; councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Phil Brock; Kristin McCowan; Gleam Davis; Oscar de la Torre; Christine Parra
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Cherish Stephens
Pilot in Training
Item 16.A
06/28/22
23 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: Jeanne Laurie <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 9:41 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Oscar de la Torre; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra
Subject: City Council 6-28 agenda item #16 -- Airport Commission appointment

EXTERNAL
To: Mayor Himmelrich and City Council members
From: Jeanne Laurie
RE: 6/28/22 agenda item #16: Airport Commission appointment I agree with all the statements made below by Zina Josephs.

I urge the Council to appoint Diane Reynolds to the Airport Commission.

As resident and community stakeholder in Sunset Park for 25 years, Diane has been an active volunteer. Her two children, Eli and Emily Brown, attended SMMUSD schools, and she volunteered with the school district and with the PTA.

In 2008, she canvassed for the SMMUSD Measure R parcel tax, which combined and replaced the previous Measures Y and S parcel taxes, contained a CPI-U adjustment, and included a senior exemption.

In 2014, Diane was an active volunteer with the successful community effort to pass Measure LC -- “It’s Our Land” -- https://itsourland.org/ -- https://2014.smvote.org/BallotMeasures/ -- “Shall the City Charter be amended to:
(1) prohibit new development on Airport land, except for parks, public open spaces and public recreational facilities, until the voters approve limits on the uses and development that may occur on the land; and (2) affirm the City Council's authority to manage the Airport and to close all or part of it?” In 2020, she was invited by Peter James to serve on a working group regarding the relocation of the Public Landscape Maintenance Division.

Diane also organized her local Neighborhood Watch group.

As the child of an Alaskan bush pilot and someone who has lived near Santa Monica Airport for many years, she would follow in the footsteps of Susan Hartley and Dr. Suzanne Paulson -- Sunset Park residents who previously served on the Airport Commission.

Item 16.A
06/28/22
24 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 As a Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist for 25 years, Diane consults with First5-LA, Connections for Children, and the L.A. County Department of Mental Health.

Her skills in organizing, providing education and training, helping teams navigate complex issues, and welcoming all voices in building the future would be very helpful on the Airport Commission.

She could support the Commission’s efforts to mitigate health impacts from the airport, promote sustainable uses, and prepare for the airport’s closure in 2029.

There are currently two pilots and an attorney on the Commission:

Joe Schmitz -- Retired Air Force Major, aviation safety expert, former university professor, PhD from the USC Annenberg School for Communication
Bruce Malarky -- Instrument-rated commercial pilot, with 25 years of experience as an Army flight instructor, currently employed as an engineer at Boeing
Geoff Neri – Attorney, former federal appellate law clerk, with substantial trial and appellate litigation experience in both state and federal courts
Diane’s skills would complement theirs.

Again, I urge the Council to appoint Diane Reynolds to the Airport Commission.

Thank you for your consideration.

Jeanne Laurie
Sunset Park
Fill your life with adventures, not things. Have stories to tell, not stuff to show.

Item 16.A
06/28/22
25 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 4 Vernice Hankins
From: Natalie Atun <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 7:11 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Re: June 28 Agenda Item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear SM City Council Members:

I wholeheartedly endorse Sunset Park resident Diane Reynolds' application to serve as an SMO Airport Commissioner and strongly encourage the Santa Monica City Council to appoint her to a four‐year term.

As a representative of our neighborhood, Diane will hold community interests in mind during the critical next four years at SMO. Diane is dedicated to mitigating SMO health impacts, promoting sustainable current uses such as a planned expansion of Airport Park, and actively supporting the Commission and SM City Council in preparing SMO for a successful return to local control in 2029.

Sincerely,
Natalie Greenberg
2315 Pier Ave
Santa Monica CA 90405
Item 16.A
06/28/22
26 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 5 Vernice Hankins
From: Erika Jancso <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 5:40 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, Ms. Lopez would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. Ms. Lopez would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a nontechnical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Erika Jancso
Resident of Santa Monica
Item 16.A
06/28/22
27 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 6 Vernice Hankins
From: Alan Levenson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 5:16 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: June 28 Agenda Item 16A (Airport Commission)

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
Please appoint Diane Reynolds to the airport commission.

She is very familiar with the airport issues and has lived in Santa Monica many years.

Her family has contributed to the life of the community and the schools.

She is smart and dedicated.

Thank you for your consideration.

Regards,
Alan
Alan Levenson
Item 16.A
06/28/22
28 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 7 Vernice Hankins
From: Kate Scott <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 3:50 PM
To: Christine Parra; Gleam Davis; Kristin McCowan; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock; Sue Himmelrich; councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
On Tuesday, you will be tasked with appointing a new airport commissioner. Currently, there is a lack of diversity on the Commission, in gender, ethnicity, neighborhood. Further, no one has a technical aviation background. We need someone with a clear understanding of the issues concerning the airport. Two candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds, do not meet these basic needs.

It would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Please consider appointing some diversity to the Commission with a woman and someone that has knowledge of aviation operations. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Kate Scott
Santa Monica Resident
‐‐
Kate Scott
KateMScott.com
310.595.0901
Item 16.A
06/28/22
29 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Annie McLaughlin <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2022 8:46 PM
To: Christine Parra; Gleam Davis; Kristin McCowan; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock; Sue Himmelrich; councilmtgitems
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Annie McLaughlin
‐‐
Annie McLaughlin
847-421-0486
Item 16.A
06/28/22
30 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: S V <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 8:27 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: June 28 Agenda Item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear SM City Council Members:

I wholeheartedly endorse Sunset Park resident Diane Reynolds' application to serve as an SMO Airport Commissioner and strongly encourage the Santa Monica City Council to appoint her to a four‐year term.

As a representative of our neighborhood, Diane will hold community interests in mind during the critical next four years at SMO. Diane is dedicated to mitigating SMO health impacts, promoting sustainable current uses such as a planned expansion of Airport Park, and actively supporting the Commission and SM City Council in preparing SMO for a successful return to local control in 2029.

Sharon Cunningham
1627 Hill street
Item 16.A
06/28/22
31 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Michael Winestone <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 9:41 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I am writing to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

In addition, I also feel that not having someone with a technical aviation background may also put the city and its residents in a position of liability if decisions made with respect to airport operations and infrastructure are not made based on experience, knowledge and fact.   Eve's background supports all of this, plus holds legal weight as a licensed attorney in the State of California.

Sincerely,
Michael Winestone
Resident of Santa Monica
[email protected]
Item 16.A
06/28/22
32 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: Toni Scharff <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 9:32 AM
To: Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems
Cc: Eve Lopez
Subject: ~~ Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Date: 6/27/22
To: Santa Monica City Council
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting Dear Santa Monica City Council:

August 28, 2022, will mark the ten-year anniversary since City Council appointed a woman to serve on the airport commission. As the commission that acts “…in an advisory capacity to the City Council in all matters pertaining to the Municipal Airport and to aviation matters generally to the extent that they affect the City,” the commission deals with highly technical issues. Despite this, the composition of the current five-member Airport Commission is not reflective of the many stakeholders involved with the airport’s operation and issues. As such, the Commission in its current incarnation is ill-suited to provide relevant and informed guidance to our elected city decision makers.

The Council is inexplicably relying for advice on a Commission that lacks basic stakeholder representation. There is a complete absence of both aviation technical expertise and diversity in any dimension – racial, gender, or geographic. How is it that not even one woman or FAA licensed pilot and resident who actually uses the airport currently serves on the Commission?
The current composition of the Airport Commission is yet another reminder that our City Council is only capable of talking the talk. It is completely unable to walk the walk.

While “good governance, inclusiveness and best practices” are routinely espoused as core Council principles, the Council has excluded any requirement for the five-member commission to possess aviation knowledge or experience to serve, despite that fact that aviation is a highly regulated and technical area. Instead, Airport Commission Item 16.A
06/28/22
33 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 members are all party-faithfuls, appointed by other party-faithfuls. And, they are all white men.

So, the question is, what is the City Council afraid of? Do they fear having even one commission member who may have differing points of view based on technical expertise? Do they fear having one person that may not have a knee-jerk affinity for closing the airport?
The “anti-airporters,” that continually clamor for the closing of the airport, are a small minority- numbering only a few hundred. Many,if not most, of the “anti-airporters” are concentrated around the airport. But one of the most active lives in Northern California! Motivations vary but do not reflect the broader city resident view.

Could it be that the City Council believes that by maintaining the monopoly of antiairport commissioners, the residents will be kept in the dark about the unique protections offered by the airport? For example, that keeping the airport open is the most assured way to protect against the development that both the area and the city overall is completely unprepared to handle? That by keeping the airport open as an airport, our local resources such as water, schools and police will not overburdened? Or, that keeping the airport open maintains a unique emergency resource that cannot be duplicated? The “anti-airporters” work hard to give the impression that their voices are the voices of the majority. But they are not.

Taken together, the current unrepresentative, and arguably unqualified Commission composition, is a complete disservice to the community, the residents and the to the Council itself.

This situation can be remedied at tomorrow's City Council meeting. City Council will make an appointment to fill one upcoming vacancy on the airport commission, which commission meets 10 times per year.

Several female pilot candidates, among others, have applied for the one open position.

Two other female applicants have applied, one of which has no relevant background or discernable interest whatsoever, and the other who has openly stated her desire to close the airport.That decision is for the Council to make, not a commissioner.

I understand that the incumbent, Chris Waller, will not be seeking re-appointment. His record on the Commission is a case study in why real stakeholders must be prioritized to occupy this important advisory group. Chris has a completely missed a significant number of airport commission meetings and attended parts of others. Moreover, he has a complete absence of any aviation knowledge.

Of the applicants, Eve Lopez, stands out as being the most qualified. Besides being a pilot and the mother of a SAMO High Student, she is also a lawyer, resident of Santa Item 16.A
06/28/22
34 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 4 Monica and a tenant of the Santa Monica airport who actually flies airplanes out of the Santa Monica airport. She is also is a woman of color.

The Council has the chance to do the right thing for itself, the city’s residents, and the other Commission members by selecting Ms. Lopez for this post. The Council can choose to walk the walk, as our mayor like to remind us. Or, the Council can choose to maintain an unrepresentative, non-diverse and technically illiterate Commission that will be unable to faithfully fulfil its mission and responsibility to the Council and the city’s residents
Thank you,
Toni Scharff
Santa Monica Resident

Item 16.A
06/28/22
35 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 5 Vernice Hankins
From: Ari Levine <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 9:26 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Thanks,
Ari Levine
Resident of Santa Monica
Item 16.A
06/28/22
36 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 6 Vernice Hankins
From: Chris Sattlberger <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 9:20 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a nontechnical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Chris Sattlberger
------------------------------------------------------------ Chris Sattlberger Motion & Stills Photography
950 N Kings Rd #221
West Hollywood (Los Angeles)
CA 90069
+1 / 310-694-1752
www.aerialimages.art
alt. email: [email protected]
Member: APA, ASMP, SOC
------------------------------------------------------------ Item 16.A
06/28/22
37 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 7 Item 16.A
06/28/22
38 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 8 Vernice Hankins
From: Nora Feddal <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 9:17 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non-technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Nora Feddal
Item 16.A
06/28/22
39 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 9 Vernice Hankins
From: Sean Wallitsch <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 9:15 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations and safety with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Thank you for time,
Sean Wallitsch
SMO Neighbor
Item 16.A
06/28/22
40 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 10 Vernice Hankins
From: Zach Goldberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 9:12 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Zach Goldberg
Item 16.A
06/28/22
41 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 11 Vernice Hankins
From: Liz DeStaffany <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 9:07 AM
To: liz D
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a nontechnical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Liz DeStaffany
Item 16.A
06/28/22
42 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Vikram Sasi <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 10:27 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Vikram Sasi
Item 16.A
06/28/22
43 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: Patrick Renner <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 10:17 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a nontechnical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Patrick Renner
Resident of Santa Monica
Item 16.A
06/28/22
44 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 Vernice Hankins
From: Lena Ekberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 10:05 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: June 28 agenda item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear SM City Council Members:

I wholeheartedly endorse Sunset Park resident Diane Reynolds' application to serve as an SMO Airport Commissioner and strongly encourage the Santa Monica City Council to appoint her to a four‐year term.

As a representative of our neighborhood, Diane will hold community interests in mind during the critical next four years at SMO. Diane is dedicated to mitigating SMO health impacts, promoting sustainable current uses such as a planned expansion of Airport Park, and actively supporting the Commission and SM City Council in preparing SMO for a successful return to local control in 2029.

My best
Lena ekberg
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16.A
06/28/22
45 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Matt Schultz <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 11:36 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a nontechnical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Matt Schultz
Matt Schultz | CAA
2000 Avenue of the Stars | Los Angeles, CA 90067
424‐288‐2767 | [email protected]
Touring.CAA.com
This e‐mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If the reader of this e‐mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e‐mail is strictly prohibited. CAA is committed to ensuring that clients are free to do their best work Item 16.A
06/28/22
46 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 without experiencing harassment and want to ensure they have the relevant resources they need. Clients can go to https://www.caa.com/legal/sexual‐harassment‐guidelines‐caa‐clients to learn more about their rights, and how to report violations.

In performing services for you, we regularly receive, process and maintain certain personal information about you. For information about how Creative Artists Agency, LLC and its subsidiaries process such personal data, please see our Privacy Notice https://www.caa.com/legal/client‐privacy‐notice.

Item 16.A
06/28/22
47 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 Vernice Hankins
From: Anjanisse Collins <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 11:17 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Item 16.A
06/28/22
48 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 4 Anjanisse Collins
Item 16.A
06/28/22
49 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 5 Vernice Hankins
From: Nick Orenstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 11:11 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. I have read all of the candidate applications and hers is superior in all areas.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Please appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.

Sincerely,
Nick Orenstein
Former resident of Santa Monica
Current pilot user of Santa Monica Airport
Item 16.A
06/28/22
50 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 6 Vernice Hankins
From: Adrian Santos <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 10:30 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a nontechnical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Adrian Santos
Mobile / What’s App: +1 757 462 0872
[email protected]
www.westcoastenergy.net
Item 16.A
06/28/22
51 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Rosalind Read <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 12:19 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a nontechnical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Rosalind Read, Esq.

Item 16.A
06/28/22
52 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: Andrew Linfoot <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 12:16 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Santa Monica Airport Commission

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Andrew Linfoot
Resident of Santa Monica
‐‐
Best,
Andrew Linfoot
LinkedIn | Twitter
Item 16.A
06/28/22
53 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 Vernice Hankins
From: K Fow <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 12:16 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Mary K Fow
Resident & Pilot, Los Angeles County
Item 16.A
06/28/22
54 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Dinirl <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:49 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Keep Santa Monica Airport Open

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non-technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Please keep in mind, that these airports are a very integral part of training Future Commercial Airline Pilots,
as well. We are losing pilots at a huge rate and replacing them a very slow rate, currently causing cancelled
flights and less flights offered overall. How are we going to meet the demand if there aren't airports for training?
Sincerely,
Leslie Dinius
Woman Pilot
Item 16.A
06/28/22
55 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: Fay Nykerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:47 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Santa Monica Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non-technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Fay Nykerk
Item 16.A
06/28/22
56 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 Vernice Hankins
From: Barry Isaacson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:33 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting: EVE LOPEZ

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Barry Isaacson
Item 16.A
06/28/22
57 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 4 Vernice Hankins
From: Matthew Bryan <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:32 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Airport Commission appoontment

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Sincerely,
Matthew Bryan
Item 16.A
06/28/22
58 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 5 Vernice Hankins
From: Joseph Saunders <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:27 PM
To: Christine Parra; Gleam Davis; Kristin McCowan; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock; Sue Himmelrich; councilmtgitems
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non-technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Joseph Saunders
Resident of Santa Monica
Item 16.A
06/28/22
59 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 6 Vernice Hankins
From: Nate <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:10 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Nathan Siahpush
Item 16.A
06/28/22
60 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Estevan Roth <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 2:11 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Airport Commission

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non-technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Estevan Roth
‐‐
Estevan Roth
818.481.7916
Item 16.A
06/28/22
61 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: James Miller <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 2:09 PM
To: James Miller
Subject: Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 SMO City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Council Member,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have the requisite knowledge to properly represent both the citizens of Santa Monica and the users of Santa Monica Airport. She also represents a diverse viewpoint on the issues affecting the airport ,both as a user and member of under-represented classes of people, whose voices are often not heard or ignored.

Her knowledge as a pilot provides the unique perspective of the value of aviation to a community. One that the current Airport Commission does not have. The actions of the past few years have demonstrated that the Airport Commission does not value the airport and has made decisions contrary to the financial well being of the City of Santa Monica. The Removal of jet traffic cost the community several million dollars in revenue.

As a pilot, I used to fly into Santa Monica Airport on a regular basis to use restaurants, buy fuel, attend entertainment events, participate in meetings and visit friends. I no longer do those things because of the policies put in place by the Airport Commission. I now hold meetings, and go to events more convenient for me to drive to outside the Santa Monica Area. The decisions of the Airport Commission have widespread impacts beyond the boundaries of the City of Santa Monica,. Please keep this in mind when you appoint your new Commissioner.

Ms. Lopez will be able to bring ideas on how the airport can continue to service not just Santa Monica, but the entire Southern California area while respecting the needs of the neighbors. Although I do not live in Santa Monica, the Airport is important to me and I hope my voice can be heard and considered.

Given the complete absence of anyone with an aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues and a voice for the users of the airport.

Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She clearly is interested in having a voice in civic activities but would be better suited for a commission which does not need technical knowledge of aviation and how it works.

Diane Reynolds, would be a disservice to the council to appoint since she has a clearly stated agenda to close the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

I strongly support Eve Lopez as the best candidate for the Airport Commission. She will provide balance and sound advice as they move forward into the future. I hope you will join me by appointing her to the Airport Commission.

Sincerely,
James A. Miller
Item 16.A
06/28/22
62 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 Vernice Hankins
From: ber <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 2:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Santa Monica Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non-technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Fred Culbertson, Pilot and patron of SMO
1-818-406-7745 cell
1-818-768-1495 fax
[email protected]
Item 16.A
06/28/22
63 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 4 Vernice Hankins
From: Alan Levine <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 2:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Airport Commission Vacant Seat

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a nontechnical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Alan Levine
Item 16.A
06/28/22
64 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 5 Vernice Hankins
From: Brent Cohen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:58 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: June 28 Agenda Item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council Members:

I wholeheartedly endorse Sunset Park resident Diane Reynolds' application to serve as an SMO Airport Commissioner and strongly encourage the Santa Monica City Council to appoint her to a four‐year term.

As a representative of our neighborhood, Diane will hold community interests in mind during the critical next four years at SMO. Diane is dedicated to mitigating SMO health impacts, promoting sustainable current uses such as a planned expansion of Airport Park, and actively supporting the Commission and SM City Council in preparing SMO for a successful return to local control in 2029.

Thank you for your consideration!
Brent Cohen
2254 Cloverfield Blvd.

Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 16.A
06/28/22
65 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 6 Vernice Hankins
From: Peter DiChellis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:57 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item16A: Housing/DTSM Appointments

EXTERNAL
DTSM Board
Strongly oppose any applicant who shares the dangerous fantasy that DTSM’s current approach to downtown security is effective. (See “Downtown Officials Reject Calls to Replace 'Safety Ambassadors'” below.) https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.surfsantamonica.com/ssm_site/the_lookout/news/News‐2022/June‐ 2022/06_06_2022_Downtown_Officials_Reject_Calls_to_Replace_Safety_Ambassadors.html__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!u XP9mhuLSZwRFf0VWIILaRaBOUoZs20WOfLgvTZhO9gthJZVSfm6TU6MAnNOQNILM6Iid0qeRteZqpYRj0NCT4SJ8sLKVdA$ Housing Commission
Strongly oppose applicant Leonora Camner, a conflicted lobbyist who used her lobbying position to undermine the City’s good‐faith efforts to pursue attainable affordable housing goals. Oppose any applicant affiliated with Camner’s lobbying organization, Abundant Housing, on the same grounds. (See letter‐writing campaign link below.) https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://secure.everyaction.com/oU099dhz1EuCtfl82N9vOw2?contactdata=QUjffakrbTSnB J5hp63HDd5U7M4Dgeh74yCDvgw8VjDbjht4o*2FQ8T*2FQFkqAWVMeLkE9lvPkHuPrwXmNftrLgax6KfluPGYm0S9cfjAFMT SFJGtUSNEd8Zx1v3uU3ow4f&emci=75e5b03f‐0495‐ec11‐a507‐281878b83d8a&emdi=27445164‐0c95‐ec11‐a507‐ 281878b83d8a&ceid=10078191__;JSU!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!uXP9mhuLSZwRFf0VWIILaRaBOUoZs20WOfLgvTZhO9gthJZ VSfm6TU6MAnNOQNILM6Iid0qeRteZqpYRj0NCT4SJkhdpirA$
Peter DiChellis
Unaffiliated moderate
Santa Monica, CA 90403
Item 16.A
06/28/22
66 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 7 Vernice Hankins
From: v a <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oscar de la Torre; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission.  As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport.  She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions.  She would clearly be better suited for a non‐airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non‐technical person who is only focused on closing the airport.  A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Atila Vass
Item 16.A
06/28/22
67 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Ron Berinstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 2:42 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please Appoint Eve Lopez

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Member,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non-technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Ron Berinstein CFII
Veteran Aviation Safety Presenter Los Angeles – Orange County – San Diego Webmaster www.SCAUWG.ORG
Southern California Airspace Users Working Group
Viewed by thousands of visitors monthly
Item 16.A
06/28/22
68 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: Dana Newman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 2:40 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: June 28 Agenda Item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members:

I strongly endorse Sunset Park resident Diane Reynolds' application to serve as an SMO Airport Commissioner and strongly encourage the Santa Monica City Council to appoint her to a four-year term.

As a representative of our neighborhood, Diane will hold community interests in mind during the critical next four years at SMO. Diane is dedicated to mitigating SMO health impacts, promoting sustainable current uses such as a planned expansion of Airport Park, and actively supporting the Commission and SM City Council in preparing SMO for a successful return to local control in 2029.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Dana Newman
1616 Sunset Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90405
‐‐
Item 16.A
06/28/22
69 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 3 Vernice Hankins
From: kim91011 (null) <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 2:20 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Santa Monica Airport Commission

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non-technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Kim Caldwell
Resident of Los Angeles County
Sent from my iPad
Item 16.A
06/28/22
70 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 4 Vernice Hankins
From: Jim Waitkus <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 2:18 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Santa Monica Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a non-technical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Jim Waitkus
Item 16.A
06/28/22
71 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) 5 Vernice Hankins
From: Joshua Mizrahi <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 2:13 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Subject: Regarding Agenda Item Number 16.A.a. – June 28, 2022 City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to encourage the council to appoint Eve Lopez to the Airport Commission. As a pilot and resident, she would be the only Airport Commissioner to have a technical knowledge about issues related to the operation of the airport. She would also be the only woman on the commission and, as a woman of color, would represent a fully inclusive choice in line with Council values.

Given the complete absence of anyone with a technical aviation background, I also wish to note that two other candidates, Marie Manvel and Diane Reynolds do not meet the basic needs that this commission currently has – which is a clear understanding of the issues.

Specifically, Marie Manvel does not meet these criteria and has submitted applications for 11 of the city’s 25 Boards and Commissions. She would clearly be better suited for a non-airport board or commission.

As relates to Diane Reynolds, I believe it would be a disservice to the council to appoint a nontechnical person who is only focused on closing the airport. A person with this bias and lack of any technical understanding of aviation issues could compromise airport operations with decisions and recommendations that may not be in the best interests of the nearby residents and other stakeholders of an operating airport.

Sincerely,
Joshua Mizrahi, Esq.

Item 16.A
06/28/22
72 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) June 26, 2022
To: Mayor Himmelrich and City Council members
From: Board of Directors, Friends of Sunset Park
RE: 6/28 agenda item 16-A: Airport Commission appointment The FOSP Board supports the appointment of Diane Reynolds to the Airport Commission.

Ms. Reynolds is the only candidate who clearly supports airport closure and transition to park space. A choice for her is a choice for the future and a vision of transforming a diamond in the rough to a sparkling jewel.

The other candidates would promote the status quo and work to maintain the airport property as an airport that serves a privileged few instead of park/recreational space for the enjoyment of the many.

In 2014, Ms. Reynolds was an active volunteer with the successful community effort to pass Measure LC -- “It’s Our Land” -- https://itsourland.org/ -- https://2014.smvote.org/BallotMeasures/
“Shall the City Charter be amended to:
(1) prohibit new development on Airport land, except for parks, public open spaces and public recreational facilities, until the voters approve limits on the uses and development that may occur on the land; and
(2) affirm the City Council's authority to manage the Airport and to close all or part of it?”
Measure LC passed with more than 60% of the votes cast, and it defeated an opposing ballot Measure D, even though the community coalition was outspent 10 to 1 by aviation interests who supported Measure D and opposed Measure LC. The voters clearly mandated the desire for park/recreational uses.

Ms. Reynolds, a resident and stakeholder in Sunset Park for 25 years has been active in community service for decades.
• Her two children, Eli and Emma Brown, attended SMMUSD schools, and she volunteered with the school district and with the PTA.
• In 2008, she canvassed for the SMMUSD Measure R parcel tax, which combined and replaced the previous Measures Y and S parcel taxes, contained a CPI-U adjustment, and included a senior exemption.

Item 16.A
06/28/22
73 of 192 Item 16.A
06/28/22

16.A.d
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4929 : Board and Commission Annual Appointments 16.A. (20 mins)) • In 2020, she was invited by Peter James to serve on a working group regarding the relocation of the Public Landscape Maintenance Division. • Organized her local Neighborhood Watch group.
• As a Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist for 25 years, Diane consults with First 5-LA, Connections for Children, and the L.A. County Department of Mental Health.

Even though an aviation background is not Ms. Reynolds’ primary asset, she is the child of an Alaskan bush pilot and someone who has lived near Santa Monica Airport for many years. She would add diversity to the current Airport Commission, following in the footsteps of Lael Rubin and Sunset Park residents Susan Hartley and Dr. Suzanne Paulson, all of whom have served on the Commission.

Sitting Airport Commissioners Joe Schmitz (retired Air Force Major) and Bruce Malarky (an instrument-rated commercial pilot, a 25-year Army flight instructor, and a former Los Alamitos Army Airfield Commander/Airfield Manager) will continue to add their aviation expertise to pertinent topics and agenda items.

← All documents from this meeting