APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 1
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Public Landscape
Relocation Process
www.smgov.net/pldrelocation
contact: [email protected]
COMMUNITY WORKSHOP
February 19, 2020
Site Alternatives
Analysis
April 2020
2 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
BACKGROUND
The Public Landscape Division (PLD) occupies a portion of a large industrial parcel adjacent to Memorial Park, which has been its headquarters since 2005. In 2017, the City Council approved to develop a masterplan to renovate Memorial Park. The masterplan included expanding the park into the parcel currently occupied by PLD and anticipated that PLD would be relocated off site. The Public Works Department (PW) with Architecture Services Division (ASD) has looked at several alternative sites throughout the City (private, institutional and City Owned) including numerous sites at the Airport. PW staff developed a public outreach process to identify and assess which site/s would be the best suited for the temporary home for PLD. Assessment criteria included; functionality for PLD operations, neighborhood impacts, development cost and timeline, among others.
Community Workshop and Engagement
At a February 19th, 2020 Community Workshop, staff provided information related to PLD’s operational activities, as well as the scale of their workforce and required vehicles and equipment. Over 50 community members were invited to ask questions of staff, and to address a large format map of the city that identified parcels of significant size adequate to contain the division. That exercise resulted in the identification of 42 individual sites for further analysis.
Initial Analysis and Formation of Resident Relocation Committee Staff analyzed the 42 identified sites for potential feasibility. The sites were organized into broad ownership categories (privately-owned, institution/utility-owned, and City-owned) for the purpose of better understanding the methodology for acquiring or leasing the land.
This analysis included descriptions of the site characteristics, available infrastructure, real estate availability, impact evaluation, and congruency with operational criteria. HACK THE MOVE!!
Site #
Owner
Site Characteristics Real Estate Evaluation
Impact Evaluation
Operational Criteria
Biggest Opportunities
Biggest Challenges
Lot Area Available 12/20?
Construction
Required?
Electricity Noise
Equipment
Storage
Building Onsite
Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3
SF
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ex. OK Poor
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Description
Description
Notes Sewer Light/Air
Facility for Staff
Dimesions x
Gas Air Quality
Bulk Storage
Water Traffic
Adjacent to Residential?
Potential Impacts
Vehicle Parking
Consolidated Split
Sale
Value ($)
Lease
Infrastructure
Map View Street View
ADA
Earthwork
Required?
Access to Parks
and Urban Forest
Notes
Address APN #
Created by Made by Made
from the Noun Project Created by Made by Made
from the Noun Project
Created by Justin Blake 120,000+ sq. ft. from the Noun Project 37 City of Santa Monica
Airport North East None.
Would require full build out.
Complicated by Measure LC. Very costly to
build out this area. Staff is exploring.
Adjacent to LA residences. Good access to Ocean
Park Blvd.
Two development sites, each approximately 60,000 SF. Large site could facilitate all of the PLD operations.
Connection to all utilities will be difficult, particularly connections in Los Angeles. Earthwork would be required for easternmost portion. Measure LC does not allow for development of
permanent uses. Adjacent to LA residences.
42 inidividual sites were identified as potential alternatives at a February 19th Community Workshop that drew over 50 particpants.
The 42 sites were further analyzed for feasibility and operational effectiveness. Also included in the early analysis was a consideration of potential community impacts.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 3
On March 9, 2020, the PLD Relocation project team met with the four members of the public review “Relocation Committee” that volunteered to help assess the selected sites and provide guidance from a resident viewpoint. During this meeting, the team presented findings from the analysis of the 42 sites and discussed the inhernt tradeoffs associated with the selection of private, institutional or City-owned sites. From the initial list of 42 identified sites, only 9 sites were agreed to be potentially available and feasible. These include:
• 3402 Ocean Park Boulevard - Santa Monica Business Park • 1757 Stanford Avenue - Private Warehouse Facility
• 3402 Pico Boulevard - Creative Office Building
• 1734 Colorado Avenue - METRO Owned Lot
• 402 Colorado Avenue - City Owned lot at EXPO Station
• 1636 5th Street - City Owned office building and small parking lot • Airport Northeast Corner (undeveloped raw land)
• 2800 Airport Avenue - City Owned land leased to SMC
• 3011 Airport Avenue - City Owned hangard
Analysis of 9 Shortlist Sites – Further Refinement
Staff further assessed these nine potentially viable sites. Staff investigated in depth the ownership and lease scenarios, operation functionality, and estimated costs of improvements. From this effort, five of the nine shortlisted sites were eliminated as follows:
• 3402 Ocean Park Bouelvard - Lease would be $55,000 per month ($660,000/ year), the area offered for lease was a vacant restaurant that would require $1M in renovation costs. Space was adequate for office work, but did not provide space for bulk storage, parking, or equipment repair. • 1757 Stanford- Lease would be $98,067/month (1,176,810/year), the area offered for lease was only for warehouse space leaving office, locker shower, toilet, or repair shop spaces to go somewhere else. Vertical/vehicle requirements for bulk storage and delivery is not possible. • 3402 Pico- lease would be $33,770/ month ($405,240/year) and only provided for office space and a small modicum of personal vehicle parking. All other requirements would have to be provided elsewhere.
• 1734 Colorado- Owned by METRO. Actual lot size (12,000 sq ft) can only accommodate Bulk Storage requirements.
• 402 Colorado- METRO Terminus parking lot- Actual usable space (28,000) cannot accommodate all equipment, bulk storage, and repair areas. Vehicle access to/from site would be problematic.
• 1635 5th Street- Provides required office space, but does not provide parking for staff and does not have space for equipment, bulk storage, and repair areas.
9 alternative sites were identified through the research and refinement process. 40 35
42 34
17 18
19 27
12 39
25 21
30 32
24 9
4 3
26 13
20 2
11 5
23 28
1 14
16 22
31 3
33 15
6 29
7 10
8 36
37 37
38 41
43 Privately-Owned Sites
ligible Sites as of 3.17.20
All Ineligible Sites
neligible Sites as of 3.17.20
Institutional/Utility/Other
City-Owned Sites
Airport Sites (City)
25 30
32 24
4 3
26 2
5 23
28 14
22 31
3 15
29 8
Privately-Owned Sites
Eligible Sites as of 3.17.20
All Ineligible Sites
Ineligible Sites as of 3.17.20
Institutional/Utility/Other
City-Owned Sites
Airport Sites (City)
4 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
Final Four Scenarios
The removal of these five shortlist sites left only three other viable site alternatives to the 2950 25th Street property. Staff was able to establish four potential scenarios from these three sites, which were all center in and around the Airport facility, specifically:
• Existing Option: 2950 25th Street Hangar with surrounding parking areas for maintenance equipment and staff and Clover Park CCS/PLD trailer for supervisor staff.
• Scenario 1: Airport NE Corner (Car Dealership Storage area at S. Centinela Ave and Bundy Ave).
• Scenario 2: 3011 Airport Ave Hangar, office and tie down space. • Scenario 3: 2800 Airport Ave Santa Monica College office building. • Scenario 4: 2800 Airport Ave SMC modular trailer building.
The four scenarios are described in detail on the following pages. This content includes information about proposed layouts, construction budget, and lease assumptions (Airport land must be leased at a fair market value. The City’s General Fund would be responsible for paying rent to the Airport Fund, per Federal statutes).
Impact of COVID-19 on PLD Relocation Process
City staff finalized their assessment and started preparing to present the remaining four sites to the public review committee. Due to the Covid-19 global pandemic the Memorial Park Expansion project has been put on hold thus eliminating the urgency to finalize this Alternative Location Assessment process. This summary report has been written to act as the starting point when this project is started again in the future.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 5
HACK THE MOVE!!
Site #
Owner
Site Characteristics Real Estate Evaluation
Impact Evaluation
Operational Criteria
Biggest Opportunities
Biggest Challenges
Lot Area Available 12/20?
Construction
Required?
Electricity Noise
Equipment
Storage
Building Onsite
Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3
SF
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ex. OK Poor
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Description
Description
Notes Sewer Light/Air
Facility for Staff
Dimesions x
Gas Air Quality
Bulk Storage
Water Traffic
Adjacent to Residential?
Potential Impacts
Vehicle Parking
Consolidated Split
Sale
Value ($)
Lease
Infrastructure
Map View Street View
ADA
Earthwork
Required?
Access to Parks
and Urban Forest
Notes
Address APN #
Created by Made by Made
from the Noun Project Created by Made by Made
from the Noun Project
Created by Justin Blake 120,000+ sq. ft. from the Noun Project 37 City of Santa Monica
Airport North East None.
Would require full build out.
Complicated by Measure LC. Very costly to
build out this area. Staff is exploring.
Adjacent to LA residences. Good access to Ocean
Park Blvd.
Two development sites, each approximately 60,000 SF. Large site could facilitate all of the PLD operations.
Connection to all utilities will be difficult, particularly connections in Los Angeles. Earthwork would be required for easternmost portion. Measure LC does not allow for development of
permanent uses. Adjacent to LA residences.
HACK THE MOVE!!
Site #
Owner
Site Characteristics Real Estate Evaluation
Impact Evaluation
Operational Criteria
Biggest Opportunities
Biggest Challenges
Lot Area Available 12/20?
Construction
Required?
Electricity Noise
Equipment
Storage
Building Onsite
Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3
SF
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ex. OK Poor
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Description
Description
Notes Sewer Light/Air
Facility for Staff
Dimesions x
Gas Air Quality
Bulk Storage
Water Traffic
Adjacent to Residential?
Potential Impacts
Vehicle Parking
Consolidated Split
Sale
Value ($)
Lease
Infrastructure
Map View Street View
ADA
Earthwork
Required?
Access to Parks
and Urban Forest
Notes
Address APN #
Created by Made by Made
from the Noun Project Created by Made by Made
from the Noun Project
Created by Justin Blake 90,000 sq. ft. from the Noun Project 41 City of Santa Monica
2800 Airport Avenue
Staff is exploring potential to break lease, or
lease portion of site in combination with
other sites.
Large site could facilitate all of the PLD operation needs.
Existing buildings could be ready for move-in.
Currently in a 5 year lease with SMC. Very expensive leashold (approx $500K per year to airport fund).
HACK THE MOVE!!
Site #
Owner
Site Characteristics Real Estate Evaluation
Impact Evaluation
Operational Criteria
Biggest Opportunities
Biggest Challenges
Lot Area Available 12/20?
Construction
Required?
Electricity Noise
Equipment
Storage
Building Onsite
Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3
SF
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ex. OK Poor
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Description
Description
Notes Sewer Light/Air
Facility for Staff
Dimesions x
Gas Air Quality
Bulk Storage
Water Traffic
Adjacent to Residential?
Potential Impacts
Vehicle Parking
Consolidated Split
Sale
Value ($)
Lease
Infrastructure
Map View Street View
ADA
Earthwork
Required?
Access to Parks
and Urban Forest
Notes
Address APN #
Created by Made by Made
from the Noun Project Created by Made by Made
from the Noun Project
Created by Justin Blake 35,800 sq. ft. from the Noun Project 8,800
42 City of Santa Monica
3011 Airport Ave 4272-026-902- Part of 3223
Staff is exploring this site in combination
with others.
This site facilitates a portion of PLD requirements.
This site requires areas that are currently used by aircraft (tie downs). In order to use this site, these ties downs need to be relocated, which is challenging.
Three Viable Sites for Study and Exploration
Analysis resulted in the identification of only three remaining alternative sites to the 2950 25th Street property. All of the sites are located at the Airport campus, and include a range of constraints that needed further study. These sites include:
• Airport Northeast Corner
• 3011 Airport Avenue
• 2800 Airport Avenue (SMC)
These three viable sites form the basis of the four scenarios that are presented in this report in the following pages. 6 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
Scenario 1
(Airport NE Corner- car dealer storage)
This scenario proposes a consolidated operation on the area currently occupied by “car dealer’s storage.” The area would accommodate PLD supervisors, muster area, gender neutral locker/shower/toilet/changing rooms in a new 36x60 Modular Trailer at this site; PLD Vehicles and three conex boxes to be stored in the parking lot open to the sky; small equipment, hand tools, equipment repair and bulk materials would be stored in a tent structure; and staff personal vehicles would be parked on the parking lot open to the sky (45 spaces).
The ROM cost is $2,924,348 for construction and $250,600 lease per year. The timeline for this project would be 34-38 months from the actual start of the project.
Pros-
• Good access to/from the site from City streets- Centinela Ave • Consolidated Operation
Cons-
• Must access into secure gated area (airfield)- adds to time to get in/out of the airfield.
• SCE upgrade for EV charging stations required
The “Northeast Corner” of the Airport is largely undeveloped. This particular area is currently improved with a 80,000 square foot surface parking lot.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 7
43,613 sf
PERSONAL
VEHICLES
OFFICE
TRAILER
26'-0"
291'-10 1/2"
CONEX BOX
CONEX BOX
CONEX BOX
181'-7 1/2"
EV CHARGING
65,255.6 sf
25'-1"
ADA
1 5
10 15
20 PICK UP TRUCKS
25'-1"
S
1 5
10 11
19 20
27 28
35 42
45 43
40 SCENARIO 1
273'-8"
BULK STORAGE
EQPT STORAGE
28'-4"
ABEL
Site layout of Scenario 1 at the Northeast Corner. This exercise helps determine the capacity of the site to accommodate the operational requirements for the Public Landscape Yards. 8 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
8'-5 1/16"
4"
6"
1-1/4"
8"
1-1/4" EQ EQ
10-1/2"
14'-0"
8'-1 11/16"
6"
EQ EQ
10-1/2" 8"
1-1/4"
1-1/4"
1'-9"
10"
6-1/16"
8-1/2"
6-1/16"
10"
1'-2"
2-3/4"
2-3/4"
8-1/2"
1-1/2" 7"
4" 4" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 168'-0" OUT TO OUT OF STEEL
9 Rigid Frames @ 21'-0" oc, Typical
BASE PLATE SCHEDULE
° C = PL3/4 x 10 x 1'-9"
° B = PL3/4 x 5 x 1'-2"
° PL3 A = 8 x 6 x 0' 10-1/2", 50 ksi
C
B
B B B B B B
B ALL OTHERS FRAMES - SIMILAR
SHOWN
TYPICAL FOUNDATION LAYOUT for "HELICAL" PILE SUPPORT
4"
A
A
1 A
A
O.H. 1
9 4"
OUT-TO-OUT 32'-0"
9'-0" 14'-0" 9'-0"
B
C
A
D
168'-0" CENTER-TO-CENTER
21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 9
NOTE: All Base Plates @ 100'-0" (U.N.)
ANCHOR BOLT PLAN
B
C C C C C C C
X-Bracing
do do
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
ROOF FRAMING PLAN
do
do
do
do
do
do do do
do do do do do
do do
do do do do do
do (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE A
D
1 2 345 6 7 8
9 A DIVISION OF
ENGINEERING SERVICES & PRODUCTS CO.
1440 18TH AVENUE SW
DYERSVILLE, IA 52040
P: 563.875.6113
F: 563.875.2317
WWW.ESAPCO.COM
DEVELOPED BY
CUSTOMER INFORMATION:CITY OF SUFFOLK, VA442 W. WASHINGTON STREETSUFFOLK, VIRGINIA 23434CUSTOMER CONTACT:ANTONIO JORDON STRUCTURE SIZE:32'-0" X 168'-0"
CONTACT PHONE:757-541-7624
STRUCTURE SKU #:116100STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION:CUSTOM I-BEAM MONOSLOPE ORDER #:
7410555
CUSTOMER #:
8748676
DRAWING DETAILS
NOT TO SCALE SHEET SIZE: 11X17
JJM
4 CREATION DATE:
3/29/2018 DRAWN BY:CCC
4/19/2018
3 2
1 NO. BY: REVISION DATE:
REVISIONS:
E1
SHEET:
SHEET TITLE:FRAMING PLAN
8'-5 1/16"
4"
6"
1-1/4"
8"
1-1/4" EQ EQ
10-1/2"
14'-0"
8'-1 11/16"
6"
EQ EQ
10-1/2" 8"
1-1/4"
1-1/4"
1'-9"
10"
6-1/16"
8-1/2"
6-1/16"
10"
1'-2"
2-3/4"
2-3/4"
8-1/2"
1-1/2" 7"
4" 4" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 168'-0" OUT TO OUT OF STEEL
9 Rigid Frames @ 21'-0" oc, Typical
BASE PLATE SCHEDULE
° C = PL3/4 x 10 x 1'-9"
° B = PL3/4 x 5 x 1'-2"
° PL3 A = 8 x 6 x 0' 10-1/2", 50 ksi
C
B
B B B B B B
B ALL OTHERS FRAMES - SIMILAR
SHOWN
TYPICAL FOUNDATION LAYOUT for "HELICAL" PILE SUPPORT
4"
A
A
1 A
A
O.H. 1
9 4"
OUT-TO-OUT 32'-0"
9'-0" 14'-0" 9'-0"
B
C
A
D
168'-0" CENTER-TO-CENTER
21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 9
NOTE: All Base Plates @ 100'-0" (U.N.)
ANCHOR BOLT PLAN
B
C C C C C C C
X-Bracing
do do
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
ROOF FRAMING PLAN
do
do
do
do
do
do do do
do do do do do
do do
do do do do do
do (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE A
D
1 2 345 6 7 8
9 A DIVISION OF
ENGINEERING SERVICES &
1440 18TH AVENU
DYERSVILLE, IA
P: 563.875.61
F: 563.875.23
WWW.ESAPCO.
DEVELOPED
CUSTOMER INFORMATION:CITY OF SUFFOLK, VA442 W. WASHINGTON STREETSUFFOLK, VIRGINIA 23434CUSTOMER CONTACT:ANTONIO JORDON STRUCTURE SIZE:32'-0" X 168'-0"
CONTACT PHONE:757-541-7624
STRUCTURE SKU #:116100
ORDER #:
741055
CUSTOMER #:
874867
DRAWING DE
NOT TO SCALE SHE
JJM
4 CRE
3/29
DRAWN BY:
CCC
4/19
3 2
1 NO. BY: REV
REVISION
E1
SHEET:
24"x24" CONCRETE PUSH BLOCKSMOVABLE.
A
A
B B B B B B B
30"x30" CONCRETE PUSH BLOCKSMOVABLE.
439.4 sf
18'-4 1/2"
19'-10 1/2"
8'-5 1/16"
4"
6"
1-1/4"
8"
1-1/4" EQ EQ
10-1/2"
14'-0"
8'-1 11/16"
6"
EQ EQ
10-1/2" 8"
1-1/4"
1-1/4"
1'-9"
10"
6-1/16"
8-1/2"
6-1/16"
10"
1'-2"
2-3/4"
2-3/4"
8-1/2"
1-1/2" 7"
4" 4" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 168'-0" OUT TO OUT OF STEEL
9 Rigid Frames @ 21'-0" oc, Typical
BASE PLATE SCHEDULE
° C = PL3/4 x 10 x 1'-9"
° B = PL3/4 x 5 x 1'-2"
° PL3 A = 8 x 6 x 0' 10-1/2", 50 ksi
C
B
B B B B B B
B ALL OTHERS FRAMES - SIMILAR
SHOWN
TYPICAL FOUNDATION LAYOUT for "HELICAL" PILE SUPPORT
4"
A
A
1 A
A
O.H. 1
9 4"
OUT-TO-OUT 32'-0"
9'-0" 14'-0" 9'-0"
B
C
A
D
168'-0" CENTER-TO-CENTER
21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 9
NOTE: All Base Plates @ 100'-0" (U.N.)
ANCHOR BOLT PLAN
B
C C C C C C C
X-Bracing
do do
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
ROOF FRAMING PLAN
do
do
do
do
do
do do do
do do do do do
do do
do do do do do
do (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE A
D
1 2 345 6 7 8
9 A DIVISION OF
ENGINEERING SERVICES & PRODUCTS CO.
1440 18TH AVENUE SW
DYERSVILLE, IA 52040 P: 563.875.6113
F: 563.875.2317
WWW.ESAPCO.COM
DEVELOPED BY
CUSTOMER INFORMATION:CITY OF SUFFOLK, VA442 W. WASHINGTON STREETSUFFOLK, VIRGINIA 23434CUSTOMER CONTACT:ANTONIO JORDON STRUCTURE SIZE:32'-0" X 168'-0"
CONTACT PHONE:757-541-7624
STRUCTURE SKU #:116100STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION:CUSTOM I-BEAM MONOSLOPE ORDER #:
7410555
CUSTOMER #:
8748676
DRAWING DETAILS
NOT TO SCALE SHEET SIZE: 11X17
JJM
4 CREATION DATE:
3/29/2018 DRAWN BY:CCC
4/19/2018
3 2
1 NO. BY: REVISION DATE:
REVISIONS:
E1
SHEET:
SHEET TITLE:FRAMING PLAN
24"x24" CONCRETE PUSH BLOCKSMOVABLE.
ABEL'S SHOP
1,037.4 sf
PUSH BLOCK CALCULATIONS: 30"x30"x5'.
L (back wall)= 7 x 21'= 145'/ 5' (block length)= 29 blocks L (8 Dividers)= 8 x 20'= 160'/ 5'= 32 blocks
Total length= 305'
5' long blocks= 61 per lift7'6" tall walls = three lifts… 3x61=183 blocks required.
$100/block= $18,300.
SWEEPER
7x12
8'-5 1/16"
4"
6"
1-1/4"
8"
1-1/4" EQ EQ
10-1/
14'-0"
8'-1 11/16"
6"
EQ EQ
10-1/2
8"
1-1/4"
1-1/4"
10 6-1
8-1
6-1
10"
8-1/
1-1/2" 7"
4" 4" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 168'-0" OUT TO OUT OF STEEL
9 Rigid Frames @ 21'-0" oc, Typical
BASE PLATE SCHEDULE
° C = PL3/4 x 10 x 1'-9"
° B = PL3/4 x 5 x 1'-2"
° PL3 A = 8 x 6 x 0' 10-1/2", 50 ksi
C
B
B B B B B B
B ALL OTHERS
SHOWN
TYPICAL FOUNDATION LAYOUT for "HELICAL" PILE SUPPORT
4"
A
A
1 A
A
O.H. 1
9 4"
OUT-TO-OUT 32'-0"
9'-0" 14'-0" 9'-0"
B
C
A
D
168'-0" CENTER-TO-CENTER
21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 9
NOTE: All Base Plates @ 100'-0" (U.N.)
ANCHOR BOLT PLAN
B
C C C C C C C
X-Bracing
do do
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
ROOF FRAMING PLAN
do
do
do
do
do
do do do
do do do do do
do do
do do do do do
do (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE A
D
1 2 345 6 7 8
9 24"x24" CONCRETE PUSH BLOCKSMOVABLE.
SWEEPER
7x12
SWEEPER
7x12
8'-5 1/16"
4"
6"
1-1/4"
8"
1-1/4" EQ EQ
10-1/2"
14'-0"
8'-1 11/16"
6"
EQ EQ
10-1/2" 8"
1-1/4"
1-1/4"
1'-9"
10"
6-1/16"
8-1/2"
6-1/16"
10"
1'-2"
2-3/4"
2-3/4"
8-1/2"
1-1/2" 7"
4" 4" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 168'-0" OUT TO OUT OF STEEL
9 Rigid Frames @ 21'-0" oc, Typical
BASE PLATE SCHEDULE
° C = PL3/4 x 10 x 1'-9"
° B = PL3/4 x 5 x 1'-2"
° PL3 A = 8 x 6 x 0' 10-1/2", 50 ksi
C
B
B B B B B B
B ALL OTHERS FRAMES - SIMILAR
SHOWN
TYPICAL FOUNDATION LAYOUT for "HELICAL" PILE SUPPORT
4"
A
A
1 A
A
O.H. 1
9 4"
OUT-TO-OUT 32'-0"
9'-0" 14'-0" 9'-0"
B
C
A
D
168'-0" CENTER-TO-CENTER
21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 9
NOTE: All Base Plates @ 100'-0" (U.N.)
ANCHOR BOLT PLAN
B
C C C C C C C
X-Bracing
do do
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
ROOF FRAMING PLAN
do
do
do
do
do
do do do
do do do do do
do do
do do do do do
do (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE A
D
1 2 345 6 7 8
9 24"x24" CONCRETE PUSH BLOCKSMOVABLE.
SWEEPER
7x12
TOOL STORAGE
CAGE
7.5x21
8'-5 1/16"
6"
1-1/4"
8"
1-1/4" EQ
14'-0"
8'-1 11/16"
6"
EQ
8"
1-1/4"
1-1/4"
10"
1-1/2"
4" 4" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 168'-0" OUT TO OUT OF STEEL
9 Rigid Frames @ 21'-0" oc, Typical
BASE PLATE SCHEDULE
° C = PL3/4 x 10 x 1'-9"
° B = PL3/4 x 5 x 1'-2"
° PL3 A = 8 x 6 x 0' 10-1/2", 50 ksi
C
B
B B B B B B
B
TYPICAL FOUNDATION LAYOUT for "HELICAL" PILE SUPP
4"
A
A
1 A
A
O.H.
4"
OUT-TO-OUT 32'-0"
9'-0" 14'-0" 9'-0"
B
C
A
D
168'-0" CENTER-TO-CENTER
21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 9
NOTE: All Base Plates @ 100'-0" (U.N.)
ANCHOR BOLT PLAN
B
C C C C C C C
X-Bracing
do do
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{PCB} PEAK COVER BRACE
RIGID FRAME, TYPICAL
{ECB} EAVE COVER BRACE
ROOF FRAMING PLAN
do
do
do
do
do
do do do
do do do do do
do do
do do do do do
do (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE (LB & AB) LATERAL & ANGLE BRACE A
D
1 2 345 6 7 8
9 24"x24" CONCRETE PUSH BLOCKSMOVABLE.
TOOL STORAGE
CAGE
7.5x21
TOOL STORAGE
CAGE
7.5x21
MOWER
10x10
DINGO
4x9
MOWER
10x10
MOWER
10x10
MOWER
10x10
MOWER
10x10
MOWER
10x10
MOWER
10x10
MOWER
10x10
MOWER
10x10
WEED
4x4
TURF
4x4
TURF
4x4
WEED
4x4
146'-8 1/2" 42'-4" 84'-8 1/2"
273'-8"
SCENARIO 1
Diagram illustrating the configuration of temporary strutures that could acommodate bulk and equipment storage and a mechanics shop.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 9
A DIVISION OF
ENGINEERING SERVICES & PRODUCTS CO.
1440 18TH AVENUE SW
DYERSVILLE, IA 52040
P: 563.875.6113
F: 563.875.2317
WWW.ESAPCO.COM
DEVELOPED BY
CUSTOMER INFORMATION:CITY OF SUFFOLK, VA442 W. WASHINGTON STREETSUFFOLK, VIRGINIA 23434CUSTOMER CONTACT:ANTONIO JORDON STRUCTURE SIZE:32'-0" X 168'-0"
CONTACT PHONE:757-541-7624
STRUCTURE SKU #:116100STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION:CUSTOM I-BEAM MONOSLOPE ORDER #:
7410555
CUSTOMER #:
8748676
DRAWING DETAILS
NOT TO SCALE SHEET SIZE: 11X17
JJM
4 CREATION DATE:
3/29/2018 DRAWN BY:CCC
4/
/2018
3 2
1 NO. BY: REVISION DATE:
REVISIONS:
E2
SHEET:
SHEET TITLE:LATERAL BRACING CALL OUTS
END RAFTER: 11592
C18EL/R
MID RAFTER: 11592
C18M
PCB
ECB
END RAFTER: 11592C18EL/R
MID RAFTER: 11592C18M
END RAFTER: 115922C18EL/R
MID RAFTER: 115922C18M
AB2
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
LB
LB
LB
LB
LB
LB
LB
AB
32'-0" OUT TO OUT
TYPICAL RIGID FRAME
21'-9"
18'-9 1/4"
[E2]
LATERAL BRACING CALL-OUT
BRACE SCHEDULE
• LB = LATERAL BRACE (SKU: LB40G10STL248T)
• ECB = EAVE COVER BRACE (SKU: AWT2PBAL25137)
• PCB = PEAK COVER BRACE (SKU: AWT2PBCL25137)
• AB = ANGLED BRACE (SKU: LB23G14SDL01512)
• AB2 = ANGLED BRACE (SKU: LB23G14SDL01913)
SCENARIO 1
Cross-section of a temporary “tent” structure protecting bulk storage and equipmnt from the elements. 10 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
Interior layout of temporary modular structures showing work stations, locker room, muster room, and other features.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 11
SCENARIO 1- AIRPORT NE CORNER
Scope: Convert existing car dealership parking lot to house all PLD activities.
Activity Notes Budget
Design
Consultant $ 190,296
Design Contingency - 15% $ 19,030
Subtotal: $ 209,326
Construction
Contractor $ 1,585,800
Construction Contingency - 10.0% $ 158,580
Utilities $ 450,000
Subtotal: $ 2,194,380
Project Management & Other Direct Costs
Survey $ 7,929
Geotech/Soils Consultant $ 15,858
PM/CM Consultant $ 39,645
Inspection & Labor Compliance $ 31,716
Public Works Staff Labor $ 39,645
Subtotal: $ 134,793
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (FF&E)
ISD Data equipment $ 100,000
Subtotal: $ 100,000
MISC
Relocation Costs $ 20,000
Subtotal: $ 20,000
Total: $ 2,658,499
Project Contingency: $ 265,850
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 2,924,348
Lease Costs per year $ 250,579
12 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
Scenario 2
(3011 Airport Ave Office-Hangar/2800 Airport Ave SMC Offices) This scenario proposes a split operation on the areas currently used by “Cars with Class”, SMO aircraft tie down area, and the SMC office building at 2800 AA. The areas would accommodate; PLD supervisors, muster area, gender neutral locker/shower/toilet/changing rooms in a renovated “Cars with Class” office area; PLD vehicles and three conex boxes to be stored in the parking lot open to the sky; small equipment, hand tools, and equipment repair would be housed in the hangar area; bulk materials to be stored in a tent structure; and staff personal vehicles to be parked across the street on the 2800 SMC office building parking lot (37 spaces).
The ROM cost is $1,798,012 for construction and $374,600 lease per year. The timeline for this project would be 34-38 months from the actual start of the project.
Pros-
• This scenario is considered split because personal vehicles are across the street, but the PLD functions are consolidated.
• Ample interior storage space for Abel and equipment.
• Ample space for truck and equipment parking.
Cons-
• Difficult access to/from City Streets- 23rd Street/Walgrove Ave. • Minimal space for personal vehicle parking (lot only accommodates 37 vehicles).
• Minimal space for Office, locker and shower, and muster room. • Fire sprinkler water service would need to be established. • SCE upgrade for EV charging stations required The 3011 property is a former home of the Public Landscape Division. Scenario 2 contemplates combining this site with one across the street to consolidate operations.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 13
43,848.2 sf
50'-1"
43,848 sf
9,120.4 sf
6,559 sf
2,560 sf
Inventory of existing surface area square footage, internal hangar space and office. 14 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
This scenario contemplates using the 3011 Airport Avenue site as the base for operations, and leveraging another City-owned property across Airport Avenue as staff parking.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 15
This diagram shows the internal configuration of the space utilizing the program requirements for PLD operations. 16 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
39.9 sf 108.8 sf
8'-3 1/2"10'-8"
5'-9 1/2"
232.8 sf
379.3 sf
7'-1 1/2"
9'-8 1/2"
17'-2 1/2"
12'-4 1/2"
18'-8 1/2"
20'-5"
12'-10 1/2"
24'-1"
10'-4 1/2"
Internal hangar and office space configuration of the 3011 Airport Avenue property.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 17
SCENARIO 2- 3011 AA HANGAR WITH 2800 AA PARKING LOT
Scope: 3100 AA- Tenant Improvement to existing hangar, office space and aircraft tie down area to house all PLD activities. 2800 AA- Parking lot - 37 spaces for staff personal vehicles.
Activity Notes Budget
Design
Consultant $ 107,477
Design Contingency - 15% $ 10,748
Subtotal: $ 118,224
Construction
Contractor $ 895,639
Construction Contingency - 10.0% $ 89,564
Utilities $ 400,000
Subtotal: $ 1,385,203
Project Management & Other Direct Costs
Survey $ 4,478
Geotech/Soils Consultant $ 8,956
PM/CM Consultant $ 22,391
Inspection & Labor Compliance $ 17,913
Public Works Staff Labor $ 22,391
Miscellaneous
Subtotal: $ 76,129
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (FF&E)
ISD Data costs $ 35,000
Telephones, Data, and Security System
Subtotal: $ 35,000
MISC
Relocation Costs $ 20,000
Subtotal: $ 20,000
Total: $ 1,634,557
Project Contingency: $ 163,456
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 1,798,012
Lease Costs per year $ 376,737
18 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
Scenario 3
(2800 Airport Ave SMC office building with adjacent parking lots) This scenario proposes a consolidated operation on the areas currently used by SMC; office building at 2800 AA and adjacent parking lots to the east and west. The areas would accommodate; PLD supervisors, muster area, gender neutral locker/shower/toilet/changing rooms, and hand tool storage in the office building; PLD vehicles and three conex boxes would be stored in the west parking lot open to the sky; small equipment, hand tools, equipment repair would be housed in the office building warehouse; bulk materials to be stored in a tent structure on the west parking lot; and staff personal vehicles to be parked on the 2800 SMC office building east parking lot (37 spaces).
The ROM cost is $1,392,493 for construction and $355,130 lease per year. The timeline for this project would be 34-38 months from the actual start of the project.
Pros-
• Ample room at 2800 AA office building for staff requirements. • Ample room at 2800 AA warehouse for repair and indoor storage requirements.
Cons-
• Difficult access to/from City Streets- 23rd Street/Walgrove Ave. • Minimal space in the PLD vehicle lot- does not accommodate all the equipment. • Minimal space for personal vehicle parking (lot only accommodates 37 vehicles).
• Assumes that SMC will remove the modular trailer.
• SCE upgrade for EV charging stations required
2800 Airport Avenue is a City owned Airport site that is leased by SMC. The College has vacated large portions of the site, making it eligible for potential reoccupation.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 19
In this scenario, PLD would occupy a portion of the existing office building, utilize an existing small 3,974sf warehouse, occupy the modular trailer setup, and make use of the existing surface parking lot.
20 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
Layout of site with potential configuration of offies, storage, employee parking on adjacent lot, and PLD equipment and vehicle parking.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 21
SCENARIO 3- 2800 AA OFFICE BUILDING AND ADJ. PARKING LOTS Scope: 2800 AA: Tenant Improvement in the existing office building and adjacent parking lots to house all PLD activities.
Activity Notes Budget
Design
Consultant $ 91,896
Design Contingency - 15% $ 9,190
Subtotal: $ 101,086
Construction
Contractor $ 765,802
Construction Contingency - 10.0% $ 76,580
Utilities $ 185,000
Subtotal: $ 1,027,382
Project Management & Other Direct Costs
Survey $ 3,829
Environmental Consultant $ 10,000
PM/CM Consultant $ 19,145
Public Works Staff Labor $ 19,145
Subtotal: $ 67,435
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (FF&E)
ISD Data costs $ 50,000
Telephones, Data, and Security System
Subtotal: $ 50,000
MISC
Relocation Costs $ 20,000
Subtotal: $ 20,000
Total: $ 1,265,903
Project Contingency: $ 126,590
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 1,392,493
Lease Cost per year $ 355,129
22 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
Scenario 4
(2800 Airport Ave SMC warehouse and modular trailer building with adjacent parking lots)
This scenario proposes a split operation on the areas currently used by SMC; office building warehouse, Modular Classroom Trailer and two parking lot areas. The areas would accommodate; PLD supervisors, muster area, gender neutral locker/shower/toilet/changing rooms, and hand tool storage to be in the renovated trailer office area; PLD Vehicles and three conex boxes to be stored in the west parking lot open to the sky; small equipment, hand tools, equipment repair would be housed in the office building warehouse; bulk materials to be stored in a tent structure on the west parking lot; and staff personal vehicles to be parked on the parking lot in front of the modular trailers (49 spaces).
The ROM cost is $1,770,619 for construction and $370,943 lease per year. The timeline for this project would be 34-38 months from the actual start of the project.
Pros-
• Ample room for personal vehicle parking and staff office needs • Ample room for repair shop and indoor equipment storage.
Cons-
• Difficult access to/from City Streets- 23rd Street/Walgrove Ave. • West parking lot shape could create challenges due to drive aisle width, PLD to investigate.
• Ownership of modular trailer (SMC or City) and how to remove a portion of the trailer to be negotiated and coordinated.
• Parking for SMC ceramics kiln building needs to be relocated/negotiated.
They could share the parking lot in front of the modular trailer. • Fire sprinkler water service would need to be established. • SCE upgrade for EV charging stations required 2800 Airport Avenue is a City owned Airport site that is leased by SMC. The College has vacated large portions of the site, making it eligible for potential reoccupation.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 23
9,451.9 sf
20,052.4 sf
5,883.2 sf
80'-1"
SCENARIO 4
This diagram depicts use of the modular trailer and surface parking lot. 24 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
20,052.4 sf
5,883.2 sf
STAFF PARKING
PL 3
ABEL
9,451.9 sf
225'-1"
50'-11"
RESTROOMS
225'-0"
50'-1/2"
25'-1/2"
OFFICE/
KITCHEN MUSTER LOCKER
SH/T/C
1 21
22 49
10 20
30 40
EQPT
CAGE
STOR
SCENARIO 4
The modular trailer provides more than enough space for PLD, however, it is more space than actually needed, which has cost implications.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 25
79'-11 1/2"
41,907.5 sf
SCENARIO 4
The remaining component of this scenario involves utilizing the triangular parking lot at the southern end of the site. This is generously sized, but its irregular shape creates a challenge for PLD’s larger vehicles.
26 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
Site programming diagram showing the potential location of bulk storage, equipment and vehicle parking, and other storage units.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 27
SCENARIO 4- 2800 AA- SMC TRAILER WITH ADJ. PARKING LOTS Scope: Convert existing car dealership parking lot to house all PLD activities.
Activity Notes Budget
A
Design
Consultant $ 96,096
Design Contingency - 15% $ 9,610
Subtotal: $ 105,706
Construction
Contractor $ 800,800
Construction Contingency - 10.0% $ 80,080
Utilities $ 450,000
Subtotal: $ 1,330,880
Project Management & Other Direct Costs
Survey $ 4,004
Geotech/Soils Consultant $ 8,008
PM/CM Consultant $ 20,020
Inspection & Labor Compliance $ 16,016
Public Works Staff Labor $ 20,020
Miscellaneous
Subtotal: $ 68,068
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (FF&E)
ISD Data costs $ 75,000
Telephones, Data, and Security System
Subtotal: $ 75,000
MISC
Site Assessment
Relocation Costs $ 20,000
Subtotal: $ 20,000
Total: $ 1,599,654
Project Contingency: $ 159,965
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 1,759,619
Lease Cost per year $ 370,943
28 | CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Alternatives Analysis
Existing Option
(2950 25th Street- Airport Maintenance Hangar/ Parking Lot/Clover Park Trailer)
This scenario provides a spit operation in the area formerly occupied by Airport Maintenance and SMPD SWAT and the Clover Park PLD/CCS office modular trailer. The PLD/CCS Modular Trailer would accommodate PLD supervisors. The Airport Maintenance Hangar would accommodate the muster area, gender neutral locker/shower/toilet/changing rooms, hand tool storage, and equipment repair; PLD Vehicles, personal vehicles and three conex boxes to be placed in the parking lot around the Hangar open to the sky.
The actual project cost was $1,236,317 for construction and $406,629 lease per year. The timeline for this project was 12 months and is complete and could be occupied immediately.
2950 25th Street was renovated in 2019 to accommodate the Public Landscape Division.
APRIL 2020
PLD RELOCATION | 29