Santa Monica City Council
September 24, 2024

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 19 be secured generally as follows:

1. Type and Cost of Participation. A developer seeking to satisfy the child care requirements of this Chapter through participation in the construction or establishment of new child care facilities shall submit documentation acceptable to the Director of Planning and Community Development to support the request for participation in lieu of fees. The documentation shall establish that the type and cost of participation including, but not limited to, construction, rehabilitation of existing structures conforming to license and zoning requirements, or land or premises dedication, bears a reasonable relationship to the fee otherwise required in subsection (A). Construction Cost Indexes, prevailing wage rates, and the best available index of costs of equipment and supplies shall be utilized to determine the level of participation relative to the required fee. In the case of land or premises dedication, the market value of land or premises dedicated shall be reasonably related to the fee otherwise required in subsection (A). If the actual construction cost or market value is greater than the required relevant fees, the City shall have no obligation to pay the excess amount.

2. Approval of Participation. The Director of Planning and Community Development, after consultation with the Director of the Community and Cultural Services Department, shall determine and approve the type and cost of participation in the construction or establishment of facilities.

3. Verification of Participation. The Director of Planning and Community Development shall require that the developer submit a written verification of participation in meeting these requirements. Said verification shall consist of documentation sufficient to enable the Director to readily determine compliance with the provisions of this Chapter.

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 20 Upon receipt of documentation sufficient to demonstrate compliance, the Director shall issue a notice that the developer has complied with the requirements of this Chapter.

4. The Director’s determination of the type and cost of participation in the construction or establishment of child care facilities pursuant to this Section may be appealed to the City Council if such appeal is filed within fourteen consecutive calendar days from the date that the decision is made in the manner provided in Section 9.37.130.

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 21 CHAPTER 9.66 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM
Section 9.66.040 Transportation Mitigation Requirement
Except as provided in Section 9.66.050, the developer of a project shall pay a transportation impact fee in accordance with the following:

A. Transportation Impact Fee. Fees shall be computed as follows:

1. For single-unit-family residential development projects that result in the addition of a dwelling unit:
a. Seven thousand six hundred dollars per multi-unit-family dwelling unit in Area 1.
b. Seven thousand eight hundred dollars per multi-unit-family dwelling unit in Area 2.

2. For multi-unit-family residential development projects that result in the addition of a dwelling unit:
a. Two thousand six hundred dollars per multi-unit-family dwelling unit in Area

1. b. Three thousand three hundred dollars per multi-unit-family dwelling unit in Area 2.
c. Two thousand six hundred dollars per multi-unit-family dwelling unit in Area 3 overlay for housing development projects that satisfy the requirements of subsection (A)(6)(a), (b), and (c) of this Section.

3. All nonresidential projects shall pay the following based on the square footage of the proposed project:

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 22 a. Retail.
i. Twenty-one dollars per square foot in Area 1.
ii. Thirty dollars and ten cents per square foot in Area 2. b. Office.
i. Nine dollars and seventy cents per square foot in Area 1. ii. Ten dollars and eighty cents per square foot in Area 2. c. Medical Office.
i. Twenty-eight dollars and ten cents per square foot in Area 1. ii. Twenty-nine dollars and eighty cents per square foot in Area

2. d. Hospital.
i. Not applicable.
ii. Fourteen dollars and seventy cents per square foot in Area 2. e. Lodging.
i. Three dollars and sixty cents per square foot in Area 1. ii. Three dollars and sixty cents per square foot in Area 2. f. Industrial.
i. One dollar and twenty cents per square foot in Area 1. ii. One dollar and thirty cents per square foot in Area 2. g. Auto Sales and Display Areas.
i. One dollar and twenty cents per square foot in Area 1. ii. One dollar and thirty cents per square foot in Area 2.

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 23 4. The land use categories identified in subsections (3)(a) through (g) shall have the following meanings:
a. Single-unit-family residential shall include single-unit-family dwelling. b. Multi-unit-family residential shall include congregate care— nonsenior, congregate care—seniors, and multiple-unit dwelling multi-family. c. Retail shall include: animal kennels and veterinary hospitals, auto repair, car wash, community meeting facilities, community centers and nonresidential adult care facilities, retail and wholesale construction- related materials, nurseries and garden centers, entertainment and recreational facilities, gas station, library, museums, aquariums and art galleries, nightclubs and bars, personal services, post-secondary educational facility, pre-school/child day care, private studio, restaurants—fast food and cafés, restaurants—sit down, retail durable goods, retail food and markets, retail mixed, and retail nonfood. d. Office shall include: creative office, financial institutions and office, and general office.
e. Medical office shall include: medical office, including medical clinics, and offices for medical professionals.
f. Hospital shall include: full service hospitals.
g. Lodging shall include: hotels, motels and other overnight accommodations.
h. Industrial shall include: surface or structured auto inventory storage, City maintenance facilities and bus yards, heavy industrial and manufacturing, light industrial, utilities, warehouse and self-storage, and wholesale distribution and

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 24 shipping.

5. For mixed residential/nonresidential development, the sum of the fee required for each component as set forth in subsections (A)(2) and (A)(3) of this Section.

6. Housing development projects within the Area 3 overlay that meet the following characteristics shall pay a transportation impact fee of two thousand six hundred dollars per multi-unit-family dwelling unit:
a. The housing development is located within one-half mile of a transit station and there is direct access between the housing development and the transit station along a barrier-free walkable pathway not exceeding one-half mile in length; and
b. Convenience retail uses, including a store that sells food, are located within one-half mile of the housing development; and
c. The housing development provides either the minimum number of parking spaces required by the municipal code, or no more than one on- site parking space for zero- to two-bedroom units, and two on-site parking spaces for three or more bedroom units, whichever is less.

7. The amount of legally permitted square footage to be demolished in an existing building or structure, or to be removed from an outdoor area used as part of a service station or for auto dealer sales, display and inventory storage, as a part of a project shall be a credit in the calculation of the transportation impact fee. Outdoor area used as part of a gas station shall not include setbacks, landscaping, parking and other paved areas used solely for access and circulation.

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 25 B. Timing of Fee Payment.

1. The project applicant shall pay fees according to the schedule of fees in place on the date the fees are paid, except that the project applicant for a project that has vested rights under State or local law shall pay the applicable fees in accordance with those vested rights. except that the applicant for a vesting tentative map for a development project shall pay the fees in effect on the date the application for the vesting tentative map is deemed complete, as automatically adjusted.

2. The Transportation Impact Fee shall be paid in full upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs last. No building permit for any project shall be issued unless the fees have been paid or, if state law requires the City to accept later fee payment, a contract to pay the fees has been executed with the City, in which case no final inspection shall be approved until the fees have been paid. If a residential development project contains more than one dwelling unit and is approved for development in phases, the developer shall pay the fees in installments based on the phasing of the residential development project. Each fee installment shall be paid at the time when the first dwelling unit within each phase of development has received its final inspection.

3. For all projects subject to this Chapter, the City may require the payment of fees at an earlier time if the fees will be collected for public improvements or facilities for which an account has been established and funds appropriated and for which the City has a proposed construction schedule or plan prior to final inspection, or the fees are to reimburse the City for expenditures previously made.

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 26 CHAPTER 9.67 PARKS AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE

PROGRAM

9.67.040. Parks and Recreation Mitigation Requirement.

Except as provided in Section 9.67.050, the developer of a Project shall pay a Parks and Recreation Development Impact Fee in accordance with the following:

A. Parks and Recreation Development Impact Fee. Fees shall be computed as follows:

1. For Single-Unit Family residential development projects that result in the addition of a dwelling unit:
a. $7,636 per single-unit family dwelling unit.

2. For Multi-Unit-Family residential development projects that result in the addition of a dwelling unit:
a. $4,138 per studio/one-bedroom multi-unit-family dwelling unit. b. $6,665 per multi-unit-family dwelling unit with two or more bedrooms.

3. All nonresidential projects shall pay the following based on the gross square footage of the proposed project:
a. Office: $2.31 per square foot.
b. Medical Office: $1.27 per square foot.
c. Retail: $1.49 per square foot.
d. Lodging: $3.11 per square foot.
e. Industrial: $1.30 per square foot.

4. The land use categories identified in paragraphs (1)—(3), above, shall have the following meanings:

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 27 a. Single-Unit Family Residential shall include Single-Unit Dwelling Family.
b. Multi-Unit-Family Residential shall include: congregate care—non senior, congregate care—seniors, and multiple-unit dwelling multi-family. c. Office shall include: creative office, financial institutions and office, and general office.
d. Medical office shall include: full service hospitals and medical offices, including medical clinics, and offices for medical professionals. e. Retail shall include: animal kennels and veterinary hospitals, auto repair, car wash, nonresidential adult care facilities, retail and wholesale construction-related materials, nurseries and garden centers, entertainment and recreational facilities, gas stations, and art galleries, nightclubs and bars, Personal services, Post-secondary educational facility, private studio, restaurants—fast food and cafes, restaurants—sit down, retail durable goods, retail food and markets, retail mixed, and retail nonfood.
f. Lodging shall include: hotels, motels and other overnight accommodations.
g. Industrial shall include: surface or structured auto inventory storage, heavy industrial and manufacturing, light industrial, utilities, warehouse and selfstorage, and wholesale distribution and shipping.

5. For mixed residential/nonresidential development, the sum of the fee required for each component as set forth above in paragraphs (A)(2) and (A)(3) of this subsection.

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 28 6. The amount of legally permitted square footage to be demolished in an existing building or structure as a part of a Project shall be a credit in the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Development Impact Fee.

B. Timing of Fee Payment.

1. The project Project applicant shall pay fees according to the schedule of fees in place on the date the fees are paid, except that the project applicant for a project that has vested rights under State or local law shall pay the applicable fees in accordance with those vested rights, except that the applicant for a vesting tentative map for a development project shall pay the fees in effect on the date the application for the vesting tentative map is deemed complete, as automatically adjusted.

2. The Parks and Recreation Development Impact Fee shall be paid in full upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs last. No building permit for any Project shall be issued unless the fees have been paid, except for residential uses where state law requires payment before final inspection or the issuance of certificate of occupancy, whichever comes first. If state law applies, a contract to pay the fees shall be executed with the City, in which case, no final inspection shall be approved until the fees have been paid. If a residential development project contains more than one dwelling unit and is approved for development in phases, the developer shall pay the fees in installments based on the phasing of the residential development project.

Each fee installment shall be paid at the time when the first dwelling unit within each phase of development has received its final inspection.

3. For all Projects subject to this Chapter, the City may require the payment of fees at an earlier time if the fees will be collected for public improvements or facilities for

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 29 which an account has been established and funds appropriated and for which the City has a proposed construction schedule or plan prior to final inspection, or the fees are to reimburse the City for expenditures previously made.

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 30 CHAPTER 9.68 AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMERCIAL LINKAGE FEE

PROGRAM

9.68.040. Affordable Housing Mitigation Requirement.

Except as provided in Section 9.68.050, the developer of a Project shall pay an affordable housing commercial linkage fee in accordance with the following:

A. Affordable Housing Commercial Linkage Fee. Fees shall be computed as follows:

1. All nonresidential portions of a Project shall pay the following based on the gross square footage of each use included in the proposed Project:
a. Retail: $9.75 square foot.
b. Office: $11.21 per square foot.
c. Hotel/Lodging: $3.07 per square foot.
d. Hospital: $6.15 per square foot.
e. Industrial: $7.53 per square foot.
f. Institutional: $10.23 per square foot.
g. Creative Office: $9.59 per square foot.
h. Medical Office: $6.89 per square foot.

2. The land use categories identified in paragraphs (a)—(h) above shall have the following meanings:
a. Retail shall include: animal kennels and veterinary hospitals, auto repair, car wash, retail and wholesale construction-related materials, nurseries and garden centers, entertainment and recreational facilities, gas stations, art galleries, nightclubs and bars, Personal services, Post-secondary educational facility,

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 31 private studio, restaurants—fast food and cafes, restaurants—sit down, retail durable goods, retail food and markets, retail mixed, and retail nonfood. b. Office shall include: financial institutions and office, and general office.
c. Hotel/Lodging shall include: hotels, motels and other overnight accommodations.
d. Hospital shall include: full service hospitals.
e. Industrial shall include: surface or structured auto inventory storage, City maintenance facilities and bus yards, heavy industrial and manufacturing, light industrial, utilities, warehouse and self-storage, and wholesale distribution and shipping.
f. Institutional shall include: educational and cultural facilities. g. Creative Office shall include: offices, production spaces and work spaces of establishments that are in the business of the development of creative property, including but not limited to, advertising, architectural services, broadcasting, communications, computer software design, entertainment, engineering, graphic design, interior design, internet content, landscape design, and similar uses.
h. Medical Office shall include: Medical office, including medical clinics, and offices for medical professionals.

3. The amount of legally permitted nonresidential square footage to be demolished in an existing building or structure, or to be removed from an outdoor area used as part of a service station or for auto dealer sales, display and inventory storage,

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 32 as a part of a Project shall be a credit in the calculation of the Affordable Housing Commercial Linkage Fee. Outdoor area used as part of a gas station shall not include setbacks, landscaping, parking and other paved areas used solely for access and circulation. Credit shall be applied on a per square foot basis according to per square foot fee assigned to the type of commercial use that existed on the site prior to the new Project application submittal.

B. Timing of Fee Payment.

1. The project Project applicant shall pay fees according to the schedule of fees in place on the date the fees are paid except that the project applicant for a project that has vested rights under State or local law shall pay the applicable fees in accordance with those vested rights, except that the applicant for a vesting tentative map for a development project shall pay the fees in effect on the date the application for the vesting tentative map is deemed complete, as automatically adjusted.

2. The Affordable Housing Commercial Linkage Fee shall be paid in full upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs last. No building permit for any Project shall be issued unless the fees have been paid.

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: CDD-Ord-6th Cycle HE Phase 2 092424 [Revision 2] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 08.07.241

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 08.07.24 CASE STUDY: RESIDENTIAL ZONE
2030 MONTANA AVE
2 EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN
2030 MONTANA AVE
PARCEL SIZE: 8,747 SF
EXISTING USE: MARKET
EXISTING BUILDING: 4,000 SF
ZONING: R2
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 4 UNITS
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 2
STORIES, 30 FT
PARCEL COVERAGE: 50%

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 2030 MONTANA AVE

ADAPTIVE REUSE

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
2030 MONTANA AVE
3 12.A.e
Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 2030 MONTANA AVE

ADAPTIVE REUSE

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
2030 MONTANA AVE
4 12.A.e
Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 2030 MONTANA AVE
PARCEL SIZE: 8,747 SF
EXISTING USE: MARKET
EXISTING BUILDING: 4,000 SF
ZONING: R2
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 4 UNITS
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 30 FT
PARCEL COVERAGE: 50%
ADAPTIVE REUSE OF SITE TO BE:

RETAIL/OFFICE: 2,646 SF
RESIDENTIAL: 11,779 SF / 13 UNITS
NEW TOTAL: 14,759 SF
NEW TOTAL HEIGHT: 39 FT
NEW PARCEL COVERAGE: 84%

ADAPTIVE REUSE OF SITE
2030 MONTANA AVE
5 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
15 FT
12 FT
12 FT

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 08.07.24 CASE STUDY: NC ZONE
1730 OCEAN PARK BLVD
6 EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN
1730 OCEAN PARK BLVD
PARCEL SIZE: 7,200SF
EXISTING USE: OFFICE/RETAIL
EXISTING BUILDING: 3,988 SF
ZONING: NC
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 2.5
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 50 FT

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 1730 OCEAN PARK BLVD

ADAPTIVE REUSE
7 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
1730 OCEAN PARK BLVD

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 8 FT
1730 OCEAN PARK BLVD
PARCEL SIZE: 7,200SF
EXISTING USE: OFFICE/RETAIL
EXISTING BUILDING: 3,988 SF
ZONING: NC
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 2.5
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 50 FT
ADAPTIVE REUSE OF SITE TO BE:

RETAIL/OFFICE: 2,166 SF
RESIDENTIAL: 8,564 SF / 14 UNITS
NEW TOTAL: 10,346 SF
NEW TOTAL HEIGHT: 42 FT
FAR: 10,346 SF / 7,200 SF = 1.4
1730 OCEAN PARK BLVD
8 ADAPTIVE REUSE OF SITE

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
12 FT
12 FT
11 FT
11 FT
12 FT

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 08.07.24 CASE STUDY: MUB ZONE
1661 LINCOLN BLVD
9 EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN
1661 LINCOLN BLVD
PARCEL SIZE: 35,000SF
EXISTING USE: OFFICE W/ PARKING
EXISTING BUILDING: 58,031 SF + 5,692 SF
OFFICE
ZONING: MUB
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 3.25
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 70 FT

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 10 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
1661 LINCOLN BLVD
1661 LINCOLN BLVD

ADAPTIVE REUSE

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE #

SECOND FLOOR PLAN (THIRD & SIXTH FLOOR SIM)
2ND FLOOR (3RD & 6TH FLOOR SIM)
12,507 SF RESIDENTIAL
15 UNITS
834 SF AVERAGE UNITS SIZE

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 12 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN (FIFTH FLOOR SIM)
1661 LINCOLN BLVD
1661 LINCOLN BLVD

ADAPTIVE REUSE
4TH FLOOR (5TH FLOOR SIM)
24,642 SF RESIDENTIAL
30 UNITS
821 SF AVERAGE UNITS SIZE

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 1661 LINCOLN BLVD
PARCEL SIZE: 35,000SF
EXISTING USE: OFFICE W/ PARKING
EXISTING BUILDING: 58,031 SF + 5,692 SF OFFICE
ZONING: MUB
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 3.25
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 70 FT
ADAPTIVE REUSE OF SITE TO BE:

RETAIL/OFFICE: 19,823 SF
RESIDENTIAL: 86,805 SF / 105 UNITS
NEW TOTAL: 125,407 SF
NEW TOTAL HEIGHT: 72 FT
FAR: 125,407 SF / 35,000 SF = 3.6

ADAPTIVE REUSE OF SITE
13 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN (FIFTH FLOOR SIM)
12 FT
12 FT
12 FT
12 FT
12 FT
12 FT

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 08.07.24 CASE STUDY: GC ZONE
1020 PICO BLVD 14

EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN
1020 PICO BLVD
PARCEL SIZE: 6,000 SF
EXISTING USE: OFFICE
EXISTING BUILDING: 6,317 SF
ZONING: GC
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 2.0
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 45 FT

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 15 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
1020 PICO BLVD
1020 PICO BLVD

ADAPTIVE REUSE
7 UNITS

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 16 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
1020 PICO BLVD
1020 PICO BLVD

ADAPTIVE REUSE
2 UNITS

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 1020 PICO BLVD 17
1020 PICO BLVD
PARCEL SIZE: 6,000 SF
EXISTING USE: OFFICE
EXISTING BUILDING: 6,317 SF
ZONING: GC
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 2.0
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 45 FT
ADAPTIVE REUSE OF SITE TO BE:

RETAIL/OFFICE: 0 SF
RESIDENTIAL: 5,483 SF / 9 UNITS
NEW TOTAL: 6,317 SF
NEW TOTAL HEIGHT: (E) HEIGHT
FAR: 6,317 SF / 6,000 SF = 1.0

ADAPTIVE REUSE OF SITE

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 08.07.24 CASE STUDY: LT ZONE
720 WILSHIRE BLVD 18

EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN
720 WILSHIRE BLVD
PARCEL SIZE: 22,492 SF
EXISTING USE: OFFICE
EXISTING BUILDING: 25,789 SF
ZONING: LT
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 3.0
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 65 FT

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 19 EXISTING FIRST FLOOR
720 WILSHIRE BLVD PLAN
720 WILSHIRE BLVD

EXISTING
EXISTING USE: OFFICE
EXISTING BUILDING: 25,789 SF
ZONING: LT
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 3.0
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 65 FT

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 20 EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN
720 WILSHIRE BLVD
EXISTING USE: OFFICE
EXISTING BUILDING: 25,789 SF
ZONING: LT
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 3.0
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 65 FT
720 WILSHIRE BLVD

EXISTING

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 21 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
720 WILSHIRE BLVD
720 WILSHIRE BLVD

ADAPTIVE REUSE
1ST FLOOR
13,099 SF RESIDENTIAL
15 UNITS
873 SF AVERAGE UNITS SIZE

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 22 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
720 WILSHIRE BLVD
720 WILSHIRE BLVD

ADAPTIVE REUSE
2ND FLOOR (3RD-4TH FLOOR SIM)
15,665 SF RESIDENTIAL
19 UNITS
825 SF AVERAGE UNITS SIZE

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation)

08.07.24 CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 720 WILSHIRE BLVD 23

ADAPTIVE REUSE OF SITE
720 WILSHIRE BLVD
PARCEL SIZE: 22,492 SF
EXISTING USE: OFFICE
EXISTING BUILDING: 25,789 SF
ZONING: LT
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX FAR: 3.0
CURRENT ALLOWANCE MAX HEIGHT: 65 FT
ADAPTIVE REUSE OF SITE TO BE:

RETAIL/OFFICE: 0 SF
RESIDENTIAL: 61,991 SF / 73 UNITS
NEW TOTAL: 69,373 SF
NEW TOTAL HEIGHT: 66 FT
FAR: 69,373 SF / 22,492 SF = 3.1

OPEN AIR STAIR
15 FT
15 FT
12 FT
12 FT
12 FT

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) CITY OF SANTA MONICA: ADAPTIVE REUSE ORDINANCE 08.07.24 [email protected]
24 12.A.e
Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Attachment E - Omgivning Adaptive Reuse Physical Feasibility Testing (1) (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Attachment G
Informational Memo for Housing Element Program 2.B, Explore the Opportunity for a Right of First Offer Ordinance.

Program 2.B directs the City to consider the opportunity for a right of first offer ordinance, which would allow non-profit affordable housing providers the first offer to purchase properties, granting them an advantage over market rate developers. This program was derived from State Bill 1079, which created a new sale process for foreclosed properties of 2 to 4 units. The bill, effective January 1, 2021, requires foreclosed homes to be sold individually to single buyers, rather than by private corporations in bulk. Once an initial bid is made, the foreclosed property must then be offered to tenants, local governments, and affordable housing developers to expand home ownership.

The City has the opportunity to build off of this law to provide non-profit housing providers the right of first offer on all properties, including those outside of foreclosure, granting them a competitive edge in the land-buying market. This informational memo provides an overview of cities that have adopted variations of right of first offer ordinances including San Francisco, San Diego, and Berkeley.

Right of first offer provides the City an opportunity to preserve the existing housing stock and can be tailored to prioritize the preservation of certain types of units, like San Diego’s proposed ordinance that applies to properties with at-risk deed restricted units set to expire.

Typically, as seen in ordinances proposed by cities like Berkeley or San Diego, right of first offer ordinances require residential landlords to notify a list of predetermined purchasers of the sale before putting a property on the market. In San Diego the list is composed of pre-qualified affordable housing providers. In addition to affordable housing providers, the City of Berkeley also offers existing tenants the right of first refusal.

While these programs may be effective in preserving existing, at-risk affordable housing stock, there is a cost associated with the development and maintenance of such a program. Based on a review of cities that have implemented a right of first offer program, it appears that for an ordinance to be truly effective, the right of first offer must be paired together with significant financial assistance in order to allow affordable housing providers to successfully compete against market rate providers in the landbuying market. Several full-time staff would also be needed to administer the program, which would include tracking for-sale properties and ensuring property sales are being noticed in compliance with the program. A long standing program in Washington, D.C. has shown success with a tenant opportunity to purchase act (TOPA), with one case study pointing to the retention of 140 units within an existing low-income development.

Although this case study maintained the affordability of 140 units and renovated an aging building from ongoing maintenance issues, the investment was significant totaling

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Attachment F - Right of First Offer Info Memo (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 2 $1.4M for acquisition and an additional $16.1M for the phase 1 of rehabilitation, excluding any additional costs for staff hours.

Berkeley Case Study
The City of Berkeley is developing an ordinance, the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act (TOPA), which empowers existing tenants to purchase any multi-unit rental property of more than four units that is listed for sale. The TOPA program proposes three protections: 1) right of first offer to purchase for existing tenants, 2) right of first refusal to match any market-rate bids, and 3) right for tenants to assign rights to a qualified affordable housing organization.

When a property owner decides to sell a multi-unit property, they are required to notify existing tenants and also the City-developed list of qualified non-profit developers.

Under TOPA, there is a window of time to submit a Statement of Interest to purchase the property. During this time the property owner is prohibited from listing the property for sale on the market. The program requires tenants to form a tenant organization to make the bid, or to formally transfer their rights to a qualified nonprofit to make the bid.

Once these options are exhausted, the seller may list the property on the market. Any offer received on the open market must be disclosed to the list of qualified purchasers, who then have the opportunity to match that bid and become the purchaser of the property. The property owner is incentivized to sell to existing tenants through a 50% transfer tax refund.

The estimated costs associated with this program come mostly from two categories:
staffing and pre-development/project management funds. Berkeley initially proposed 6 full-time employees to manage the program, a cost of approximately $750,000 per year for staff hours alone. Berkely has since reduced the staffing down to one full time employee (FTE) for on-going staffing and management of the program, totaling approximately $220,000 annually. Additionally, Berkeley supports qualified organizations (non-profit housing providers) with $25,000 per project, covering the outof-pocket costs of the project. These costs are expected to be drawn from developer fees. The City also loses 50% of the base transfer tax per property that participates in the program. Berkely also expects a need for initial funds to support ongoing outreach and education on the new program. The updated total expected costs for the program is approximately $373,000 annually.

San Diego Case Study
San Diego has taken a different approach to their right of first offer ordinance. The Affordable Housing Preservation Ordinance requires owners of deed-restricted affordable housing projects who wish to sell their property to provide a notice of intent to sell to the City of San Diego, the San Diego Housing Commission, and a predetermined list of affordable housing developers.

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Attachment F - Right of First Offer Info Memo (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 3 The City of San Diego has tailored their ordinance to target at-risk deed restricted affordable units that are set to expire by 2040. San Diego has approximately 13,450 of these units that are slated for expiration in the next twenty years. In an effort to preserve existing affordable housing, the City has created a preservation action plan that includes this right of first refusal ordinance along with the re-direction of the Residual Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) towards affordable housing preservation.

The ordinance proposed by the City of San Diego differs from the requirements of SB 1079 in that the right of first refusal is expanded to include deed restricted properties with 5 units or more. The City has similar noticing requirements to Berkeley’s proposed program, requiring property owners to file a Notice of Intent to Sell to the existing tenants, the local government, and list of qualified developers. The property owner has the option to accept or reject the first offer, at which point they then can put the property on the open market. Any offer received on the market can be counteroffered by the existing tenants, local government, or qualified entities.

Monitoring and enforcement of the program is currently proposed through the court system, where qualified entities may take action against property owners that do not follow the required procedures for noticing. Concerns were raised about the lack of enforcement and the City is continuing to explore alternative means for enforcement.

San Diego staff states that the program has no fiscal impact.

Santa Monica Context
Santa Monica could benefit from a right of first offer program that expands beyond the requirements of SB1079, although such a program would require additional staff and substantial funds to effectively preserve affordable housing for existing tenants. Data from the Housing Element also highlighted that housing costs and by extension, land costs in Santa Monica are among the highest in the nation. This would suggest that the City would need to make a substantial investment into a right of first offer program in order to increase the opportunity for success. Given limited financial resources, the City has instead chosen to commit public land to support the production of affordable housing (in accordance with Housing Element Program 2.E) and continues to support a variety of programs that preserve existing housing. Further, the housing unit replacement requirements of the Housing Crisis Act (SB 330) have appeared to be effective as a housing preservation measure.

Although the staff report on San Diego’s program states that there will be no fiscal impact from this program, research done for the Berkeley TOPA ordinance shows that substantial investment is needed to effectively prevent displacement of existing tenants.

The TOPA program in Washington, D.C., one of the oldest TOPA programs that started in 1980, sets aside a minimum of $10 million from their Housing Production Trust Fund annually, although reports show even more money spent on these programs. In FY

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Attachment F - Right of First Offer Info Memo (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 4 2018, the TOPA program was allocated $22.5 million to acquire and rehabilitate about 449 units in 9 projects.

SB1079 currently provides protection for existing tenants in foreclosed multi-unit projects of up to 4 units. Santa Monica may choose to explore an expansion of this program to prevent displacement and protect existing tenants, although significant investments would be needed to effectively ensure the protection of at-risk affordable units.

Sources

1. Legislative Information, Senate Bill Number 1079, 2020.

2. Mayor Jesse Arreguin (Berkeley), Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act Staff Report, 2022.

3. Mayor Jesse Arreguin (Berkeley), Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act Staff Report, 2023.

4. Molly Chase, Staff Report to the Land Use and Housing Committee (San Diego), 2023.

5. Steve Glaude, The Role of the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act (TOPA) in Washington, DC, 2023.

12.A.f
Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Attachment F - Right of First Offer Info Memo (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 1 David Yakobson
From: Noma Boardmember <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 12:52 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oscar de la Torre; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Phil Brock; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Gleam Davis; David White; Douglas Sloan Cc: Nancy Coleman; Bruce Leddy
Subject: Oppose Item 12A - 9-24-24

EXTERNAL
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

To: City Council
Re: Agenda Item 12A, City Council meeting of Sept. 24, 2024 From Bruce Leddy, Chair of NOMA
Re: OPPOSE Council action on “minor revision” to SB9, Request that it be REMOVED for full discussion and public comment
Dear City Council,
In the opinion of NOMA's Board, the revisions considered in this evening's Agenda Item 12A are far from "minor" revisions. They will extend the provisions of SB9 beyond the state's intention, allowing corporations rather than individual owners to take advantage of SB9 multi-unit development.

We ask that this item be pulled from consideration until such time as the Council and public can fully consider the implications.

Thank you,
Bruce Leddy
NOMA'S Next Meeting: SPECIAL DAY, THUR. OCTOBER 10TH
at 7PM on ZOOM
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 2 https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81526517066
smnoma.org
[email protected]
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 1 David Yakobson
From: Greg Orshansky <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 5:18 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: "City Council 9/24/24 agenda item #12A - Stanford neighbors lawsuit"

EXTERNAL
Hello, I have lived in Santa Monica since 1998, went to Santa Monica high school and my children have all gone through the public schools at Santa Monica (currently).

I strongly oppose corporations or out of state LLC from getting SB9 lot splits on empty lots - not legal by the way the statute was written and certainly not the intent. I support the lawsuit by the Stanford neighbor’s and currently live on Stanford Street.

Greg Orshansky
310-357-7753
Sent from my iPhone
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 1 David Yakobson
From: Tricia Crane <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 11:27 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oscar de la Torre; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Phil Brock; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Gleam Davis; David White; Douglas Sloan Subject: Agenda Item 12.A - OPPOSE Council any action on “minor revision” to SB9

EXTERNAL
To: City Council
Re: Agenda Item 12A, City Council meeting of Sept. 24, 2024 From Tricia Crane, Chair of Northeast Neighbors
Re: OPPOSE Council action on “minor revision” to SB9, Request that it be REMOVED for full discussion and public comment
Dear City Council,
On behalf of the residents of all R1 neighborhoods and in the interest of an honest and fair implementation of SB9, this Council must direct staff to remove the proposed “minor revision” (see that language embedded below) from Agenda Item 12A.

There is nothing “minor” about this proposed “cleanup” given that residents are challenging the legality of the proposed SB9 project on Lipton and Stanford.

We ask that this be pulled out for full discussion and not be included as an acceptable “clarification” until the impact and implications are fully explained and discussed.

Thank you
Tricia Crane
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) 2 Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024

12.A.g
Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) City Council
Housing Element Phase 2 Adoption Hearing
September 24, 2024

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Background & Purpose
Background
• Housing Element Phase 1 Implementation completed in 2023 • Deadline to implement Phase 2 by October 15, 2024
Tonight’s Hearing
• Overview of Mandatory Implementation of Phase 2 Housing Element programs & consistency with State law
• Key Policy Questions
• SB684
• Adaptive Reuse Ordinance
• Bergamot Standards

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Schedule for Phase 2 Implementation
Date (2024) Zoning Topics
January 17 • Planning Commission introduction to Housing Element Phase 2 implementation January - March • Stakeholder outreach (development community, affordable housing providers, etc.) April 10 • Building & Fire Life Safety Commission (Adaptive Reuse Ordinance) May 2 • Adaptive Reuse Technical Working Group #1
May 8 • Planning Commission study session
June 5 • Adaptive Reuse Technical Working Group #2
June 11 • City Council study session for policy direction August 7 • Planning Commission recommendation
September 24 • City Council adoption

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Out of Compliance - Consequences
Implementation of Phase 2 Housing Element program is mandatory Immediate short-term consequences
• Re-open potential for filing of "builder's remedy" projects • Loss of funding for affordable housing
• Potential for 3rd party (private) litigation
Long-term consequences
• SB423 (formerly SB35) determination based on building permits issued relative to prorated RHNA • If Above Moderate RHNA not met – streamlined process for projects with at 10% affordability • If Lower Income RHNA not met – streamlined process for projects with at least 50% affordability • Requires ministerial approval process for housing projects that include these affordability levels State can also seek judicial relief and impose penalties and fines

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Summary of Changes for Mandatory
Phase 2 Housing Element Programs

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Program 1.B
Summary of Changes
• Amend Section 9.31.915 to indicate that qualifying SB 35 (now SB 423) projects must comply with adopted
objective design standards
• Amend Chapter 9.55 Architectural Review
establishing:
• ARB cannot reduce density or have the effect of
denying a housing project
• ARB hearing limit - 3 noticed public hearings subject to State law (SB 330)
Streamline The Architectural Review Process and Ensure Design Review Objectivity For Housing Projects

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Program 1.I
Summary of Changes
• Reduced Plan check fees for Factory Built (FBH)
already in effect June 2024 – factory constructed
version of residential building, unit, room, or building components
• Delete Section 9.31.180, Manufactured Housing, of the Zoning Ordinance due to outdated provisions
Ensure That Local Regulations Support Innovations In Construction Technology To The Extent Technically Feasible

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Program 2.B
Informational Memo
• SB 1079 created new sale process for foreclosed
properties of 2 to 4 units
• Housing Element obligates City to explore options
for right of first offer ordinance
• Case Study Highlights (Berkeley, San Diego)
• Tool for preserving at-risk units with expiring deed
restrictions
• Expands homeownership opportunities
• Relies on partnerships with non-profits
• Requires significant annual funding: Full-time staff, financial assistance for downpayments
Right Of First Offer Ordinance For Nonprofit Affordable Housing Providers

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Program 2.C (part 2)
Summary of Changes
• State Density Bonus Law provides strong incentive for on-site affordable units
• Unnecessary to expand alternatives for off-site option, fee option, or mixed compliance option
• Cleanups to Chapter 9.64, AHPP
• Clarify that 5-unit projects can also provide on-site affordable units to qualify for State Density Bonus
• Clarify that replacement unit requirements of State law override the AHPP
• Align dispersal requirements of affordable units to the Health and Safety Code
• Clarify timing for payment of in-lieu affordable housing fees for vested projects
Update The City’s Affordable Housing Production Program

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Program 2.I & Program 5.B
Summary of Changes • Revisions to residential land use classifications for compliance with State law
• Reorganization of land use classifications and land use tables to differentiate between Residential Dwelling Types and Housing Types for Specific Needs
• Revisions to definitions of “household” and “disability”, and Reasonable Accommodation ordinance to remove
barriers to fair housing
• As required by AB 101, establishment of a new Low Barrier Navigation Center land use classification (already a
permitted use) • Permitted by
-right in mixed-use and nonresidential zones that
permit multiple-unit dwellings
Updating Residential Land Use Classifications and
Removing Barriers to Fair Housing

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Program 3.A
Summary of Changes
• Add new Chapter 9.34, Residential Unit Replacement
Requirements to Zoning Ordinance
• All projects must comply with all applicable residential unit replacement requirements
• Exemption – Projects that do not result in new construction and would not involve the reduction of protected units as defined by State law • June 11, 2024 Council direction
• Replacement units in certain situations shall be rent controlled instead of deed-restricted for lower income households
• Clarify that in event of conflict between AHPP and State law, replacement unit requirements of State law will control Restrict The Removal Of Existing Rental Units For Site Redevelopment And Require That Protected Units Are Replaced

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Consistency with State Law
Summary Changes + Policy Questions

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Revisions for Clean –Ups & Clarity
• Applicability reference for Administrative
Approval
• SB 9 implementation (declarative of existing
State law and City practice)
• Removed nonobjective language from
mezzanine definition
• Applicability of aggregate setbacks in the R1
• Connect between private and common
open space total amount
• Setback exemption MUDs build on
surface parking lots
Subsequent to adoption of Phase 1 Housing Element implementation, minor revisions necessary to Zoning Ordinance, DCP, and LUCE for cleanup and clarification purposes.

See table in staff report for more detail
• Active use applicability on “defined” Commercial
Blvds
• Removal of full bathroom limitation in accessory
structures
• Incorporate fortune telling & tattoo parlors uses
• Vesting of Development Impact Fees
(declarative of existing State law)
• DCP entitlement and tier system
• LUCE policy consistency with changes to
development standards

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Revisions for Consistency with State Law
AB 1033 –ADU Ownership
Background
• Effective January 1, 2024
• October 24, 2023 Council Direction
• Support AB 1033 and draft a local ordinance to allow the separate sale or conveyance of primary dwelling units and ADUs as condominiums
Implementation
• Create new Section 9.31.026, Accessory Dwelling Unit Condominiums, to incorporate provisions for ADU ownership pursuant to AB 1033
 Authorize separate sale or conveyance of ADUs through creation of condominiums  Establish modified process (no public hearing) for projects that result in four or fewer airspace parcels
• Does not authorize the establishment of more ADUs than are otherwise permitted under the Zoning Ordinance

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Revisions for Consistency with State Law
AB 602 –Development Impact Fee Payment Timing
Background
• Effective January 1, 2022
• Requires jurisdiction to collect applicable fees for a project upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs last • Some impact fees (e.g. TIF, parks & recreation fee) currently require payment prior to issuance of building permit
Implementation
• Change timing for payment of development impact fees to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs last

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Revisions for Consistency with State Law
Government Code Section 65583.2 –Ministerial Approval for Lower Income Shortfall Sites Background
• "Lower Income Shortfall" - difference between the lower income units that could be achieved through existing Zoning and the RHNA (i.e. 1,884 units) • Criteria for sites identified to address lower income shortfall must require:
• At least 50% residential use
• 20% affordability requirement
• Approved through ministerial process (no public hearing) • Housing Element Program 1.K - City-owned Sites identified for lower-income shortfall Implementation
• Revise Section 9.39.020 of the ZO to allow for Administrative Approval  Housing projects on City-owned site identified in the 6th Cycle Housing Element, where at least 20% affordable to lower-income households
 Any project with at least 50% residential proposed on City-owned sites, where 20% are affordable to lower-income households that are sold or leased and used to satisfy the City’s shortfall of lower income units as identified in the 6th Cycle Housing Element

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Revisions for Consistency with State Law
SB 684 –Ministerial streamlining for ownership housing of 10 units or less Background
• Effective July 1, 2024
• Affords ownership housing projects of 10 units or less the following • Process subdivision maps ministerially (no public hearing) within 60 days • Reduce minimum side and rear setbacks to 4 feet OR retain existing setbacks if reconstructed within same footprint
• Side and rear setbacks in multiple-unit zones are generally 8 feet and 15 feet,respectively • Allows a jurisdiction to prohibit ADUs/JADUs and SB9 urban lot splits • No Council direction has been received regarding expanding these provisions - proposed changes prohibit ADUs/JADUs and SB9 urban lot splits when a project utilizes SB 684

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) SB 684 Policy Question
Planning Commission Recommendation
• For consistency in implementation, allow ownership and rental projects to have the same side and rear setbacks (4 feet)
Policy Question #1:

Should rental housing projects in the multiple unit districts have the same minimum setbacks as ownership housing projects?
Yes means… No means…
• Ownership and rental projects
will have the same 4-foot side
and rear setbacks
• Ownership projects will have 4-
foot side and rear setbacks
• Rental projects will have side and
rear setbacks of generally 8 feet
and 15 feet
PC Recommendation

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Adaptive Reuse Ordinance

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Program 1.H
Three Guiding Principles

1. Establish incentives for conversion of existing commercial space to residential use as an alternative to new construction

2. Provide a feasible alternative for smaller scale housing projects in context with existing land uses as a counterbalance to larger density bonus projects

3. As a new program, commit to revisions to the ARO if standards are not incentivizing adaptive reuse projects
Adaptive Reuse Of Existing Buildings For Permanent Residential Use

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Typical Characteristics Suitable for AR
Building Size
• Study for San Francisco found that best candidates
for adaptive re-use were high rise buildings with floor plates between 12,000 – 20,000 SF • Typically residential buildings are at least 60 feet
deep
Vacancy
• Buildings must be vacant in order to be converted to
residential. Buildings more than 50% vacancy more
likely to be adaptively reused
Building Age
• Older buildings are more likely to be converted
because their prior uses may now be obsolete.

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) SM Opportunities Adaptive Reuse
High office vacancy rate (20%)
Untapped opportunities for small scale AR projects

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) AR
– Conversion Only

1. Allow for Conversion (partial or full)

2. Addition of units/floor area within building not
counted towards density or height

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Incentivizing AR – Bonus Floor Area
2 story addition
Top Addition:

Additional 2 stories above existing building
Allow AR projects to include bonus floor additions that are “appropriate to scale”.

Bonus floor area would be entitled to same incentives as existing building.

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Incentivizing AR – Bonus Floor Area
Rear/Side Addition for Residential and NC Zones
New
addition (1
story above
existing)
Small lot incentive – additional floor area needed to
promote adaptive reuse of smaller parcels that are
15,000 SF or less

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Incentivizing AR – Bonus Floor Area
Rear/Side Addition for All Other Zones
New addition (1
story above
existing and 100%
floor area)
Limitation applies to ensure spirit of AR and
that new construction is not out of
scale/context with the existing building

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Incentivizing AR – Bonus Floor Area
Enclosures of Covered Outdoor Walkways
and Similar Spaces
Allow projects to convert inactive and
underutilized covered outdoor spaces
near existing street frontages to
residential use.

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Commercial Use in
Residential Zone
Parcel Size: 8,747 sf
Building Size: 4,000 sf
AR Modeling
Physical feasibility modeling to understand allowable scale of new addition and whether guiding principles are being achieved
• Small lots (Residential and NC)
• Typical commercial lots
• Full conversion without addition
Small Lot in NC Zone
Parcel Size: 7,200 sf
Building Size: 3,988 sf
2030 Montana
1730 Ocean Park

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) AR Modeling – 2030 Montana Ave

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) AR Modeling – 1730 Ocean Park Blvd

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) MUB Zone
Parcel Size: 35,000 sf
Building Size: 63,600 sf
AR Modeling
• Typical commercial lots
• Full conversion without addition
LT Zone
Parcel Size: 22,492 sf
Building Size: 25,789 sf
GC Zone Small Lot
Parcel Size: 6,000 sf
Building Size: 6,317 sf
1601 Lincoln
720 Wilshire 1020 Pico

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) AR Modeling
– 1661 Lincoln Blvd

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) AR Modeling
– 720 Wilshire Blvd

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) AR Modeling
– 1020 Pico Blvd
Second Floor
First Floor

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Findings
– AR Scenario Modeling
• Feasibility of top additions depend on building type
and construction
• Where there is space, side/rear additions increase
feasibility but ideally might need to be detached
• In NC where active groundfloor commercial is
required, flexibility needed for new units in new
construction
• Retaining parking has design implications • Limiting the bonus area in side/rear to 100% of existing floor area is insufficient for small parcels and small buildings

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) AR Eligibility
• Applicability – Must occur within existing building envelope and not result in demolition
• Bonus Floor Area with incentives permitted, up to ARO limits • AR Project Types – Must be housing development project resulting in minimum 2 units
 Nonresidential to Residential (except for hotel/motel)  Nonresidential to Live/Work in Nonresidential Districts  Any Building (not previously used for multi dwelling) to Multiple Dwelling Units  Any existing floor area to 100% affordable housing or Extremely Affordable Adaptive Reuse Project

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Adaptive Reuse Ordinance
Procedures for AR Projects
Processed as Administrative Approvals
Waiver of impact fees, except for Parks and Recreation fee Exempt from Chapter 9.64, AHPP
Based on City of Los Angeles’ AR feasibility study, research in other cities with AROs, and discussions with adaptive reuse experts from the Technical Working Group, the inclusionary requirements of the AHPP would render adaptive reuse projects financially infeasible.

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Adaptive Reuse Ordinance • Incentives –Waiver from development standards Residential Districts Non-Residential Districts
• Density Limits • Floor Area Ratios (where applicable) • Stories and Building Height • Parcel Coverage • Setbacks • Stepbacks • Transitional Requirements Adjacent to R1 District
• Open Space & Landscaping • Unit Mix • Bicycle Parking • Vehicle Parking • Floor Area Ratios • Building Height • Setback • Stepbacks • Daylight Plane • Open Space & Landscaping. • Unit Mix • Bicycle Parking • Vehicle Parking

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Adaptive Reuse Policy Question
• Currently, a new housing project is required to maintain or replace at least 50% of the existing parking serving an existing Policy Question #2:

Should adaptive reuse projects consisting of partial conversion be required to retain existing parking for the land use to remain?
Yes means… No means…
• Maintain or replace at least 50%
of existing parking
• No existing parking will be
retained
PC Recommendation

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Bergamot Area

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Program 1.E
Summary of Changes
• Repeal Chapter 5 of BAP and integrate into Zoning Ordinance • Use Classifications
• Development Standards
Establish New Chapter 9.12 Bergamot Districts- Development Standards • Updated Land Use Table
• Updated Standards including standards previously endorsed by Council in 2023
• Housing FAR/Height remains unchanged per Phase I implementation • New Standards • Open Space
• Taller Buildings
• New Process Incentive: Special Project Standards for Housing Projects on Large Sites
Revise The Bergamot Area Plan (BAP)To Support Housing Production

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Updated Land Use Table & BAP ODS Standards
• Updated Land Use Table
• Updates & Aligns Land Uses established in 2015 Zoning Ordinance Update • Inconsistencies eliminated
• Simplifies certain land use review consistent with recent Economic Recovery efforts • Clerical fixes
• Updated Standards
• Build-to Line
• Ground floor active use and pedestrian-oriented design • Modulation and Stepback Standards (street, side, daylight plane, roofline) • Ground Level Pathways (initial concepts)

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Council Direction on Bergamot Standards
• Taller Building Standards
• Maximum Podium Height & Footprint
• Maximum Tower Footprint
• Minimum Tower Spacing
• Open Space
• Maximize open space particularly on ground floor

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Proposed Taller Building Standards
• Minimum Height at which Taller Building
Standards Apply: 90 feet
• Max. Tower Footprint: 12,000 sf • Max. Podium Height : 35 feet • Max. Podium Footprint: 35,000 sf • Min. Tower Spacing: 80 feet • Min. Offset Tower Spacing: 40 feet (when diagonally opposite)

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Tower Spacing
Considerations • Intention to allow for light/air
between buildings
• Several cities have tower
spacing standards – 80 feet is
common requirement

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Bergamot Existing Conditions
• Unusually large
block and parcel
sizes compared to
rest of city
• Limited services • Impacts walkability

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Bergamot Open Space
- Vision
• Vision for walkable neighborhood
with social gathering spaces in key
areas connected by pathways
• BAP vision was intended to be
implemented through Development
Agreements
• How do we achieve the vision
without Development Agreements?

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Bergamot Open Space
- Implementation
Open Space Achieved In Two Ways • Standard Open Space Requirements • Focus on maximizing open space • Piggyback on utilizing service roads/access already required for a project as open space
• Special Process Incentive Program • New process incentive program (no public hearing) for housing projects on large sites over 1
acre and less than 3 acres
• Must provide certain project commitments that
support BAP vision for Open Space and
Connections

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Bergamot Open Space
- Strategy
• 3 Key Components of Standard Open Space
Requirements • Open Space based on • Number of units/residents (project size) • Parcel size (for ground floor open space) • On-Site Open Space for project occupants (e.g. balconies, decks)
• Ground Floor Open Space available to the
public on larger parcels: • Ground Floor requirement increases with parcel size
• Minimum dimension for ground floor
open space

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Achieving BAP Open Space Vision:

Residential & Community Open Space
Standard Requirements
• Ground floor open space
available to everyone
• Require ground floor
pathway to support on-site
circulation & encourage
connections through
adjacent properties, where
feasible
• Incentivize open space to
be located next to public
streets

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Creating Walkable Neighborhoods
Walkability Achieved by Enlarging and Activating
Pedestrian Space • Open Space Near the Sidewalk • Additional space between curb & building for pedestrians & activity.
• Additional space can be used for landscaping,
outdoor dining, etc.
• Active Ground Floor Use & Design • Enhance the pedestrian experience at the sidewalk • Ensure opportunities for ground floor commercial uses that are neighborhood serving.

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Creating Walkable Neighborhoods
Building Setback from Street • Based on Downtown requirement • Ensures adequate spacing between buildings & street, results in improved sidewalk
accessibility
• Targeted Area for Activation: • Nebraska Between Stewart & Berkeley
• Pennsylvania Between 26th& Stewart
• Varies in depth based on existing sidewalk
conditions & future expected development • 20’ • 15’ • 10’ • Setback Measured from Curb to Building

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Pathway Examples

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Special AA Process Incentive for Housing Projects on Large Sites For Council Consideration:

For Sites Greater than 1 Acre
• Voluntary project commitments that support BAP vision for open space & connections may request
Administrative Approval (no public hearing)

1. Unit Mix to Require Family-Size Units
 Max 15% Studio Units
 Min 15% 2 Bed Units
 Min 10% 3 Bed Units

2. More Ground Floor Open Space
 Adjacent to public street
 Dedicated for public use

3. Implement BAP Vision
 Ground Level Pedestrian Pathway OR New Street dedicated for public use per BAP Figure 7.01
Adopted BAP
Street Network

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Planning Commission Recommendation
• Presented to Commission
• Fence around private
outdoor living area may not
exceed 5’ and must be 50%
transparent over 42”
• Consistent with DCP
requirements
• PC Recommendation
• Fence around private
outdoor living area may not
exceed 4.5’
• No transparency
requirement
Fences Around Private Outdoor Living Area Adjacent to a Street

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Planning Commission Recommendation
• Presented to Commission
• Minimum: 1 acre
• Maximum: 3 acres
• PC Recommendation
• Minimum: 1 acre
• Maximum: no limit
• If cap is considered, should be
no less than 4 acres
Special AA Process Incentive for Housing Projects on Large Sites – Parcel Size Eligibility

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Planning Commission Recommendation
• Presented to Commission
• 14% of parcel area
• Intent: Supported by modelling
conducted by AECOM
• PC Recommendation
• 1 acre – 2.25 acres: 12% of parcel
area
• > 2.25 acres: 14% of parcel area
• Intent: Ensure sites between 1-2.25
acres are incentivized to
participate in the incentive
program and not unduly impacted
by higher ground-level open space
requirement
Special AA Process Incentive for Housing Projects on Large Sites – Ground Level Open Space Requirement

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Planning Commission Recommendation
• Presented to Commission
• 20% of ground level open space
can be covered by enclosed
building
• Intent: Ensure that vast majority
of ground level open space is
open to the sky
• PC Recommendation
• 25% of ground level open space
can be covered by enclosed
building as long as there is
minimum 20 feet height
clearance for open space
• Intent: Incentivize greater height
clearance for open space
underneath enclosed buildings
Special AA Process Incentive for Housing Projects on Large Sites – Percent Building Cover of Ground Level Open Space

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) BAP Special Process Incentive Policy Questions
Policy Question #3:

If Council is interested in the proposed special incentive program for housing projects on sites over 1 acre in the Bergamot area, should there be a cap on parcel size to qualify for this voluntary special process incentive program? Yes means… No means…
Parcels greater than 1 acre and no more
than 4 acres are eligible to use voluntary
special process
Parcels greater than 1 acre are eligible to
use voluntary special process (no cap on
parcel size)
PC Recommendation PC Recommendation

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) BAP Special Process Incentive Policy Questions
Policy Question #4:

Should there be other project commitments to be considered in this voluntary special process incentive program?
• Voluntary incentive program provides flexibility in creating requirements but balance with having program that will be used • Consider relationship to achieving Bergamot Area Plan vision

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) Recommendation

1. Adopt a finding that the proposed amendments to the LUCE, BAP, DCP, and Zoning Ordinance were analyzed as part of the 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element EIR and Addendum, and no further review pursuant to CEQA is required

2. Adopt Resolution Amending the Text of the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan

3. Adopt Resolution Amending the Text of the Bergamot Area Plan

4. Adopt Resolution Amending the Text of the Downtown Community Plan

5. Introduce for First Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Amending the Text of the Zoning Ordinance

12.A.h
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6371 : Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 24, 2024
Agenda Item: 16.A
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Request by Councilmember Oscar de la Torre that the City Council endorse Measure A on the November 2024 ballot. Measure A is a countywide measure to repeal and replace the Measure H ¼ cent sales tax that expires in 2027, replacing it with a ½ cent sales tax, which is expected to raise approximately $1,076,076,359.00 annually until voters decide to end it, with new audits and oversight. The funds from Measure A will require accountability and results, create affordable housing, support home ownership, provide rental assistance, increase mental health and addiction treatment, reduce and prevent homelessness and provide services for children, families, veterans, domestic violence survivors, seniors, and disabled people experiencing homelessness.

Prepared By: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Measure A
B. 16 Item - Measure A - Text
C. Written Comments
D. Written Comments

16.A
Packet Pg. 751
Affordable Housing, Homelessness
Solutions & Prevention Now
A L.A. County Citizens’ Initiative
proposed by the
Our Future L.A. County Coalition
1 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for Ballot Measure Proponents
These 5 leaders formally filed the measure as ballot measure proponents:
● Elise Buik
○ President & CEO, United Way of Greater L.A.
● Edgar Campos
○ Executive Director, T.R.U.S.T. South LA
● Andrew Kerr
○ Chief Financial Officer, Crew Inc.
● Veronica Lewis
○ Executive Director, HOPICS
● Miguel Santana
○ President & CEO, California Community Foundation
2 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for Despite Heroic Work, Homelessness Keeps Climbing
● 30,000+ people are currently
receiving services funded by the
existing countywide tax for
homeelessness & 100,000+ people
have ended their homelessness
over the last 5 years
● The average rent is $2,349 for a
two bedroom apartment in L.A.

County, which requires a wage of
$45 an hour to afford
● Only 1 in 4 people who are eligible
for federal rental subsidies can use
them
● We do not have a dedicated
countywide revenue stream for
affordable housing production &
preservation or technical
assistance to small cities to update
their land use/housing policies
3 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for Housing Production in L.A. County is at an All-Time Low ● Less housing is being built
now than at any point in the
last 80 years
● Cities are being asked to do a
lot- without adequate
resources to support
● And we’re losing the
affordable housing we havebetween 2009 and 2019 we
lost nearly 200,000 units
that rent for less than $1k a
month in the L.A. Metro Area
4 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for We won’t make progress ending homelessness unless we do a better job of preventing it in the first place
● We’ve never had a
coordinated, well resourced
countywide strategy to
produce more affordable
housing, protect the affordable
housing we have, and support
renters at risk of homelessness
● Until Now! LACAHSA exists
for this purpose.
5 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for A Bold, New
Approach
The purpose of this citizens initiative is to
use goals-based accountability to fund
L.A. County’s comprehensive
homelessness response system as well
as invest in new strategies to address
street encampments, prevent
homelessness and create affordable
housing.

This measure would terminate and
replace the existing ¼ cent sales tax
that currently funds the homelessness
response system and expires in 2027 with
a ½ cent countywide sales tax.
6 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for Core Citizens Initiative Ballot
Measure Components
Outcome Goals
Focus the measure’s intent
and impact.

Accountability, Governance and
Oversight
A new approach to accountability & oversight
Local Solutions Fund, Technical
Assistance & Innovation Fund
Shared responsibility, experimentation
and implementation support for cities
Revenue Source
Replace existing ¼ cent sales
tax with ½ cent sales tax
Revenue Allocation & Accountability
A flexible allocation plan with
clear guardrails
01 02
05 03
04 7

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for 8 OUTCOME GOALS- Accountability in Action

1. Increase the number of people moving from encampments into permanent housing in order to reduce unsheltered homelessness.

2. Reduce the number of people with a mental illness and/or substance use disorder who are experiencing homelessness.

3. Increase the number of people permanently leaving homelessness.

4. Reduce the number of people falling into homelessness.

5. Increase the number of affordable housing units in L.A. County.

The goals shall be determined by the Executive Committee informed by the L.A. County Leadership Table and relevant Agencies/Departments, no later than April 1, 2025.

Each goal will have specific metrics as well as short, medium, and long term time bound deadlines, at minimum 5 and 10 years.

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for Accountability,
Governance and
Oversight
Mirroring and connecting to the ongoing
implementation of L.A. County’s Blue Ribbon
Commission on Homelessness.
● Needs Assessment +
Regional Plan
● Real Time Evaluation &
Accountability
● Transparency &
Communication
9 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for 10 A Balanced Approach
Core Programs:
● Homeless Services: 50%
● Flexible: Services or Housing- 10%
○ Local Solutions Fund
○ Innovation Fund
● Housing Production: 24%
● Homelessness Prevention, Renter Supports: 11%
● Accountability, Data, Evaluation- 1.25%
*LACAHSA’s allocation can never be reduced below 33% of total funds, and services funding may be shifted to LACAHSA in future years as the landscape changes- this will support the bonding capacity of the agency.

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for Revenue Allocation- Assumes $1.25B
Allocation Amount (*rounding) % Share of Total Revenue 02 Core Homeless Services (Substance Use Treatment, Mental Health Services, Outreach, Emergency Shelter, Supportive Housing Services, Short Term Rental Assistance) ( 86.6% of services allocation) $612,000,000 Local Housing & Services Solutions Fund for Cities (15% of services allocation) $110,000,000 Innovation Fund (3.3% of services allocation) $12,000,000 Services & Emergency Housing (County & Cities) Subtotal $735,000,000 60% L.A County Development Authority Housing Production Fund $36,000,000 3% Accountability, Data & Evaluation Fund $15,000,000 1.25% LACAHSA - Production, Preservation & Affordable Ownership (minimum 40%) (assumes 61.5%) $262,000,000 LACAHSA- Renter Supports & Homelessness Prevention (minimum 30%) (assumes 30%) $131,000,000 LACAHSA- Flexible (any eligible agency use (minimum 15%) (assumes 100% allocation to Production) LACAHSA- Cities Technical Assistance (minimum 5%) $21,000,000 LACAHSA Admin & Operations (maximum 10%; assumes 5%) $21,000,000 LACAHSA (County & Cities) Subtotal $438,000,000 35.75%
11 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for Key Facts & Outputs
Affordable Housing &
Homelessness Prevention:
● $3 Billion+ for Affordable Housing
Production & Preservation over the
next 10 years
○ Triple the current local funding
investment
● $1 Bilion+ for homelessness
prevention & at-risk renter
supports
○ Current Measure H investment in
prevention is $20M in current budget-
$200M over 10 years
Homeless Services System
● Ensures 30,000+ people continue
to receive housing and services
(possible 25% in homelessness) :
● 22,000 people in supportive
housing continue to receive
services
● 8,700 emergency/interim
housing beds continue
operating
12 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for 13 Allocation Analysis- Cities
Cities- 36% of total annual revenue raised is earmarked for cities directly ($444M out of $1.25B)
● $110M in guaranteed annual services funding through Local Solutions Fund ○ 15% of services category
○ 4X the current Measure H Local Solutions Fund ($25M in FY23-24 budget) ● $312M in guaranteed annual housing production / renter supports funding ○ 5 largest cities can self administer, others through COGs ○ 70% of production & preservation categories allocated to cities/unincorporated/COGs by Low Income RHNA goal
○ 70% of renter protections & supports categories allocated to cities/unincorporated/COGs by per capita low income renter
● $21M in guaranteed annual LACAHSA funding for cities under 50k ○ Technical assistance for program design, policy creation, land use updates

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for Funding AdjustmentsAccountability & Innovation
● If Outcome Goals are not achieved, that County and LACAHSA shall each move at least 2.5% of funding from existing programs to different programs that have demonstrated higher effectiveness. ● Funding to LACDA shall be contingent upon LACDA continuing to receive $100M in annual funding from the County annual budget.
● Any reduction in this annual appropriation results in a dollar for dollar reduction in the 3% allocation, with those funds instead going to LACAHSA
14 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for Revenue Source
½ Cent Sales Tax, replacing
existing ¼ cent increment
● A net increase of ¼ cent for most cities
in L.A. County
○ 5 cities are currently not paying
Measure H would increase by ½ cent
■ Compton, Lynwood, Pico
Rivera, Santa Monica, South
Gate
● Sales Tax does not apply to:
○ Rent
○ Groceries
○ Medicine
○ Gas
○ Items purchased with EBT
15 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for Next Steps
● The Measure was filed on
Monday, November 6
● 400,000 submittable
signatures are required to
achieve 260,000 valid
signatures
● Signature collection began in
early December and will take
approx. 5 months
16 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for THANK YOU!
17 16.A.a
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Measure A (6655 : Support Measure A for






   


  







!"
#$%

&"
#'
("
)"#)*"
#' ("
&#+
,
#'
*#-

."*"- /)#-
.

$

-
& #
-

%
+-"

0 #
1"
%/
- "$"%
1,
("
&
*'#$

%")
$ /"

#'

0 %
'""

%/
- $
#

%
$")"
*
.
/"
-+$"
(
)$"
/1*"
*23

456763
&2849:;3
84<=6>6?6496?
@4?
A2=364B45
C2D676334633
>=B3B3
D839
E6
D69
AB9C
E27?
46A
@>9B24
92 D2F6
<62<76
G=2D
9C6
39=6693
@4?
B492
C283B45
G@396=H
<=6F649
C2D676334633H
<=2FB?6
D2=6
D649@7
C6@79C
@4?
38E39@4>6
@E836
9=6@9D649H
@4?
B4>=6@36
9C6
@F@B7@EB7B9:
2G
@GG2=?@E76
C283B45I
#4
@4:
5BF64
4B5C9H
JKHKLM
<62<76
B4
*23

456763
&2849:
@=6
C2D67633H
AB9C
@
7@>N
2G
@F@B7@E76
@GG2=?@E76
C283B45
@4?
36=FB>63
98=4B45
9C6
&2849:;3
39=6693
B492
A@B9B45
=22D3
AB9C
42 A@:
289I
C6
>=B3B3
B3
247:

B4>=6@3B45
B4
36F6=B9:H
AB9C
*23

456763
&2849:
38GG6=B45
G=2DO PQ

KK
<6=>649
B4>=6@36
E69A664
RSLT
@4?
RSRL
B4
?6@9C3
2G
<62<76
6U<6=B64>B45
C2D676334633H
AB9C
?=85
2F6=?236
9C6
76@?B45
>@836
2G
?6@9CV PQ WT
<6=>649
2G
<62<76
B4
*23

456763
&2849:

X@B73
38GG6=B45
G=2D
D649@7
B774633H
@4?
RJ
<6=>649
2G
B4D@963
E6B45
C2D67633V PQ #F6=

KKSHSSS
=6496=
C2836C27?3
<@:B45
D2=6
9C@4
KSY
2G
9C6B=
B4>2D6
B4
=649V
*23B45

RSSHSSS
84B93
9C@9
=6496?
G2=
7633
9C@4
ZLHSSS
<6=
D249C
G=2D
9C6
=649@7
D@=N69
2F6=
@
?6>@?6V
@4? PQ JK
<6=>649
2G
9C6
84C2836?
<2<87@9B24
7BFB45
649B=67:
843C6796=6?
2=
B4
96493H
$!3H
>@=3H
64>@D<D6493H
2=
29C6=
D@N63CBG9
3C6796=3
24 9C6
&2849:;3
39=6693H
3B?6A@7N3H
<@=N3H
E6@>C63H
@4?
B4
29C6=
<8E7B>
3<@>63I
[B9C289
E27?
46A
@>9B24H
C2D676334633
AB77
>249B486
92 3N:=2>N69
@>=233
*23

456763
&2849:I \]
^_`a
_b
c\]
bb_de`fa]
_ghij^
_k]a]hhj]hh
_agci_jh
`je
d]l]jci_j
_m
d`jh`nci_jh
`je
h]
`o
deij`jn]
ih
c_
hi^jibin`jcap
d]egn]
`je
qd]l]jc
\_k]a]hhj]hh
ij
_h
j^]a]h
_gjcp
E:O
PQ -B54BGB>@497:

B4>=6@3B45
@4?
@>>676=@9B45
9C6
@F@B7@EB7B9:
2G
@GG2=?@E76
C283B45V -B54BGB>@497:

B4>=6@3B45
9C6
@F@B7@EB7B9:
2G
BDD6?B@96
C283B45
@4?
B496=BD
C283B45
2<9B243V -B54BGB>@497:

B4>=6@3B45
D649@7
C6@79C
9=6@9D649
G2=
<62<76
6U<6=B64>B45
C2D676334633V -B54BGB>@497:

B4>=6@3B45
38E39@4>6
@E836
9=6@9D649
G2=
<62<76
6U<6=B64>B45
C2D676334633V
??=633B45
7@=56
3>@76
@4?
B4?BFB?8@7
64>@D<D6493H
<62<76
7BFB45
B4
$!3
@4?
@892D2EB763H
2=
29C6=AB36
7BFB45
B4
<8E7B>
3<@>63
E:
>=6@9B45
>2446>9B243
92 C283B45V
PQ )=636=FB45
>8==6497:
@GG2=?@E76
C283B45V

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

 















 

 



 

 
  


















 






































   


















  


 



















  







 





!

" #
$$


 %









  








 











!

"   %




&

' 

! 































(




)














 
 


 

 (




 






 








*

+,-.-/0.-1





" 


!





2 !3%"
%
4 &56
7&8'%89
!""5&83!:% %3; 6"3%58
<* 3%3 
!&3=5%3;*
3

5









!

=


=
6




8

3


&
3)
5
*
3
" 


!


 




>" ?

>'
 
 *?
3

5














 



 




" 



 
@





3)

"


AB$C*D<

"


"




%%


<<*
8 





5




 

(









E 

F


 






*
6"3%58
B* G!6&
=
! *
!
(





3)

"


AB$C*D<





HIHJI
H





AK<


6   

BDBKI
G
=






L*AK



!

" 
"







F



BD


*
3



G
=#
)
 

D*BJM*

6"3%58
K* '%63%:&3%58
!8'
&6
57 7&8'6*
!* NOPQRSTPPUVSWXOYVXZ[\Z]^P_VPUVS`P`]WSRXOPQ_RQSVPVSWQRPaPbXYbc OS\P`PVVbPVVdRPU_TYbcOS\P`PVVbPVVdZbU\ZeYbcOS_VYbc\SRPZWWSRUZ^`PYbfSVgbcP`PV hS_bX]ijXYVYbXPbUPUXSW_bUQRSaPbZbUYbbSaZXYaPOS\P`PVVbPVVQRPaPbXYSbQRScRZ\VZbU OS_VYbcVS`_XYSbVXOZXZUURPVVXOPRSSXTZ_VPVSWOS\P`PVVbPVVdYbT`_UYbc\PbXZ`OPZ`XOVPRaYTPVk V_^VXZbTP_VPXRPZX\PbXkVXRZXPcYPVXS\ZePOS_VYbc\SRPZWWSRUZ^`PWSRTRYXYTZ`QSQ_`ZXYSbV YbT`_UYbc^_XbSX`Y\YXPUXSaPXPRZbVdVPbYSRVdXRZbVYXYSblZcP]S_XOdWZ\Y`YPVmYXOTOY`URPbdQPSQ`P mYXOUYVZ^Y`YXYPVdQPSQ`PmYXOZbY\Z`TS\QZbYSbVdmS\Pbd\P\^PRVSWfnoNpjgqTS\\_bYXYPVd V_RaYaSRVSWUS\PVXYTaYS`PbTPdSaPRRPQRPVPbXPURZTYZ`cRS_QVdZbUSXOPRVZXRYVeSWOS\P`PVVbPVVk ZbUXSPbV_RPZVYcbYWYTZbXRPU_TXYSbYbYbUYaYU_Z`VZbUWZ\Y`YPV`YaYbcSbXOPVXRPPXVSRYbSXOPR Q_^`YTQ`ZTPVXORS_cOS_XRPZTOdV_QQSRXYaPVPRaYTPVdZbUOS_VYbciNOYVrRUYbZbTPPVXZ^`YVOPV RS^_VXSaPRVYcOXZbUZTTS_bXZ^Y`YX]QRSaYVYSbVdRPs_YRPVT`PZRcSZ`VdZbURPZ``STZXPVW_bUYbcYW cSZ`VZRPbSX\PXi tQPTYWYTZ``]dXOPQRSTPPUVSWXOYVXZ[\Z]^P_VPUXSu

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

  













  





















 








 










 



 




 

 



!


"#


#

 $
%
#


 

&'()*+$
 ,-*./0123

 
 

 




"#


4

#


 

&'5,67,12

8
 



9



 



 

:
;





< 







   


 
:
;








=> ?)*+5@A+,.-*B*A+6@C.(0+,CDE(@FG6@.(F@BB*F+&',CDE(@FG6@.(F@BB*F12+A)HBB+ DEA(FEIC(*+()*+JF@/**DA+@K+()*+(HLM+.*(+@K+6@C.(0+/@A(A+AJ*/EKE*D+E.+ACIJHFH-FHJ)+,>N+@K+()EA+A*/(E@.+ .@(+(@+*L/**D+O>NP+@K+H..CHB+(HL+JF@/**DAM+HA+H.D+Q)*.+B@/HB+=FHDB*0G=CF.A+R.EK@FS+THB*A+H.D+ RA*+?HL*A+HF*+DEA(FEIC(*DM+(@+()*+6@C.(0M+5,67,M+H.D+()*[email protected]+,-*./0+HA+K@BB@QAV  WOP+(@+()*+6@C.(0+K@F+6@SJF*)*.AEX*+U@S*B*AA.*AA+T*FXE/*AM+()*+ 5@/HB+T@BC([email protected]+YC.DM+H.D+U@S*B*AA.*AA+T@BC([email protected]+Z..@XH([email protected]+

,(+B*HA(+[NP+@K+()*+KC.DA+HBB@/H(*D+C.D*F+ACIJHFH-FHJ)+=>[+A)HBB+ I*+CA*D+K@F+()*+5@/HB+T@BC([email protected]+YC.D3 ,(+B*HA(+[>WNP+@K+()*+KC.DA+HBB@/H(*D+C.D*F+ACIJHFH-FHJ)+=>[+A)HBB+ I*+CA*D+K@F+U@S*B*AA.*AA+T@BC([email protected]+Z..@XH([email protected]+  [>\NP+(@+()*+6@C.(0+K@F+,//@C.(HIEBE(0M+7H(HM+H.D+]*A*HF/)3
 ^P+(@+5,67,+K@F+5@/[email protected]+_F@DC/([email protected]+H.D
8 ^N>`NP+(@+()*[email protected]+,-*./0+K@F+,KK@FDHIB*[email protected]+H.D+_F*X*.(E@.> ?)*+=@HFD+@K+TCJ*FXEA@FA+A)HBB+*XHBCH(*+Q)*()*F+E(+EA+HJJF@JFEH(*+(@+HDaCA(+()*+KC.DE.-+ HBB@/H([email protected]+@K+()EA+JHFH-FHJ)+=+QE()+F*AJ*/(+(@+KEA/HB+0*HF+\O^Ob\O^[+H.D+H(+B*HA(+*X*F0+KEX*+0*HFA+ ()*F*HK(*F+(@+F*KB*/(+()*.G*LEA(E.-+.**DA+E.+5@A+,.-*B*A+6@C.(0+K@F+HKK@FDHIB*+)@CAE.-+H.D+ )@S*B*AA.*AA+A*FXE/*A>+,.0+HDaCA(S*.(A+A)HBB+.@(+F*DC/*+()*[email protected]+,-*./0cA+HBB@/H(E@.+C.D*F+ ACIJHFH-FHJ)+=>d+@K+()EA+A*/(E@.+I*B@Q+^^>^^P+J*F/*.(> 6> ?)*+6@C.(0+A)HBB+AJ*.D+KC.DA+HBB@/H(*D+(@+E(+K@F+6@SJF*)*.AEX*+U@S*B*AA.*AA+ T*FXE/*A+(@+JF@XED*+A(H.DHFDEe*D+IHAE/+A*FXE/*A+(@+IFE.-+J*@JB*+E.AED*+H.D+*.ACF*+()H(+J*@JB*+)HX*+ H//*AA+(@+A@/EHB+A*FXE/*AM+S*DE/HB+/HF*+H.D+I*)HXE@FHBfS*.(HB+)*HB()+/HF*M+H.D+@.+)@S*B*AA.*AA+ JF*X*.(E@.+A(FH(*-E*A>+?)*+gL*/C(EX*+6@SSE((**M+QE()+E.JC(+KF@S+()*+5*HD*FA)EJ+?HIB*M+A)HBB+ D*X*B@J+I*A(+JFH/(E/*A+K@F+A(H.DHFDEeH(E@.+@K+/HF*M+E./BCDE.-+IC(+.@(+BESE(*D+(@+/@..*/([email protected]+(@+

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

 











 



 


 












  



 


  










 








  




 






 



  
 






 








 
























 
 






 

  









  





  


 
















 


 

 




!
!






 





" 











#$%&'()(*+,-(.$%(/(++*(++0('-,1(+,*1/23(4256'(*$5/,%,5(35$7 89: ;'(-(*5,*<)$%(/(++*(++7 69:.$%(/(++&'(-(*5,$*&'$<'6%,*1/23,*<425*$5/,%,5(35$+(*,$'+= >6%,/,(+?,5)1),/3'(*=6*3-(5('6*+@ 49:024+,3,A(3)$2+,*<@
19:B6&,3'()$2+,*<@6*3 39:C*5(',%D4',3<()$2+,*<>$'5)$+((E&(',(*1,*<)$%(/(++*(++9 F9: G(*56/)(6/5)7 69:H25&65,(*516'(@
49:;+I1),65',116'(=2'<(*516'(=6*3(%('<(*1I'(+&$*+(@
19:;('%6*(*56*3,*5(',%)$2+,*<6*3+('-,1(+>$'&($&/(?,5) %(*56/,//*(++@6*3 39:B(+,3(*5,6/16'(>61,/,5,(+9
J9: H25&65,(*56*3'(+,3(*5,6/+24+56*1(2+(5'(65%(*5@
9: #6+(%6*6<(%(*56*3$25'(61)+('-,1(+7 69:G(*56/)(6/5)=+24+56*1(2+(=6*31$2*+(/,*<+('-,1(+@
49:K$%(+5,1-,$/(*1(+('-,1(+@ 19:0('-,1(+>$'&('%6*(*5+2&&$'5,-()$2+,*<@ 39:0('-,1(+5$'()$2+(&($&/(,%&615(34I5)(1',%,*6//(<6/+I+5(%@ 6*3 (9:G2/5,3,+1,&/,*6'I5(6%+9
L9: M%&/$I%(*5+('-,1(+7

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)









 


 


 










 














 













 


! "











#


$#



%
&








'







 



 




 
 "(






)





 *




+, -./012345607.89908992:85/0;34<70;=2>05./0?2:890@2935A2470B34<0520:A5A/7C0:234:A970 2;0D2E/=4>/457C084<F2=05./01234560240G/.89;02;0A57034A4:2=H2=85/<08=/87C0;2=0H=2D=8>70:247A75/450 IA5.05./0H3=H27/70/43>/=85/<0A40H8=8D=8H.0102;05.A707/:5A2402=0;2=0H3=H27/70/43>/=85/<0A40 J2E/=4>/45012</07/:5A240KLMNN0OPQROS,C0A4:93<A4D0G35042509A>A5/<0520.2>/9/774/770H=/E/45A24C0 .2>/9/774/7707/=EA:/7C02=08;;2=<8G9/0.237A4D0H=2D=8>7,0 T B34<708992:85/<0;2=05./0?2:890@2935A2470B34<0IA990G/0<A75=AG35/<05205./0 1234560;2=0<A7G3=7/>/450520:A5A/7084<F2=0:234:A9702;0D2E/=4>/4570IA5.A40 5./01234560520G/07H/450H3=7384505205.A70H8=8D=8H.0+, U -./0?2:890@2935A2470B34<07.8990G/0<A75=AG35/<0520:A5A/7C0:234:A9702;0 D2E/=4>/457C084<05205./01234560240G/.89;02;0A57034A4:2=H2=85/<08=/87C0 EA8080;2=>3980G87/<02405./0H2A45VA4V5A>/0:23450=/W3A=/<0G605./0X4A5/<0 @585/70+/H8=5>/4502;0Y237A4D084<0X=G840+/E/92H>/45084<F2=07A>A98=0 >/873=/702;0H/2H9/0/ZH/=A/4:A4D0.2>/9/774/77C08705./0[28=<02;0 @3H/=EA72=70</5/=>A4/70A40:24739585A240IA5.0:A5A/70IA5.A405./0123456, \, -./012345607.89907H/4<0;34<708992:85/<0520A50;2=0Y2>/9/774/770@2935A2470 ]442E85A24702404/I075=85/DA/7084<0</>2475=85A240H=2^/:570</7AD4/<05208:.A/E/05./0D289707585/<0A40 H8=8D=8H.0_02;07/:5A240L02;05.A70`=<A484:/,0-.A70;34<A4D0>860G/037/<0520A4:3G85/084<05/7504/I0 A</870;2=0;353=/C098=D/=V7:89/07H/4<A4D034</=025./=07/:5A24702;05.A70`=<A484:/, B, -./012345607.89907H/4<0;34<708992:85/<0520A50;2=_::23458GA9A56C0+858C084<0 a/7/8=:.0;2=037/70A45/4</<0520H=2>25/08::23458GA9A56C02E/=7AD.5C034AE/=7890<858C084<0235:2>/0 /E89385A24084<0520/ZH84<0:8H8:A560;2=0<8580:299/:5A24084<0=/H2=5A4D0G60B34<A4D0a/:AHA/457C0 :245=8:52=7C084<07/=EA:/0H=2EA</=7,0-./7/0;34<70>860G/037/<0520./9H0;8:A9A585/0A>H9/>/4585A2402;0

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)



    
 
  
 
  
  
 

  


 

 
 
      


! 
  

   

 " #     
    $ 
 
% 


&   


' 
$ ( "

"
) "  
  

    
' "
 #  
  $
   
*++ ,-./,012  '   3
456 )   $

' 
756 
'  

856 )
 
  
 956 #

 


 
 

' 
 
 
 '     
    '
 

' 
 

  
 


:56  
    " &

 % 


;

   "   
' "
 # 
 ' '< 
   =
   ) 
>  
    
 
  
 
  
 ?  #
 ?  
 

(
#   
%  '  

    ' 



 
  ' 



 
@
 

 
     
   $
 % 

 A  

 $B
#   
%  '  
 
  '    
   
 




 


  % CDCEFGDHCIJKLMCNGOGCOHG P
)    
 


  
% 
 '  


  ' 

 

 '  B 
) B  

 

 

 

  $ 

  

 Q ; 
 '   '  
    
  


 !   
  

   "  
   

Q

;RS!(S
!PRQ)TUS)Q VQU! S R) TU

Q

WLXYYKEKCLECXMFKGZKL[EFGO\DOC]G]]GE^CDEFKL]GMEKCL]8XLY_`EFK]aDYKLXLMG FX]^KZG[CXH]b 456 WLMDGX]GEFGL\NcGDC^OGCOHGNCZKL[^DCNGLMXNONGLE]KLEC OGDNXLGLEFC\]KL[ECDGY\MG\L]FGHEGDGYFCNGHG]]LG]]d

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

  











 





















  !










 "










#$
%


& '







(


)







 
 
(









 




 * 

%




+
$

,
- %



.

 
 



 





 
 
 (
  (
 








 *




/
 /





 
 




 0





1234567892:46;2<=4>2?@=  A

B


( 
 






 








 

 
 

 



$



"


 











 

CD E>46FG49<HIJ46C2::IHH446=>K??64JK?<KH46L52M54==6H23K5@6M2K?=6I86LK5KM5KL>6N62O6 H>I=6=49HI28P63IH>6K864:L>K=I=6286M2K?=6QP6RP6K8@6ST6K8@6H>46;2<=I8M6NM489U6=>K??64JK?<KH46L52M54==6 H23K5@=6H>46M2K?=6I86LK5KM5KL>6N62O6H>I=6=49HI28P63IH>6K864:L>K=I=6286M2K?=6V6K8@6WD6X2H>6H>46 FG49<HIJ46C2::IHH446K8@6H>46;2<=I8M6NM489U6=>2<?@6928=I@456K??654?4JK8H6Y4U6=U=H4:6 L45O25:K8946:4H5I9=654O454894@6I86LK5KM5KL>6X62O6H>I=6=49HI28T654L25H6L<Z?I9?U6K=6H263>4H>456H>2=46 M2K?=6K546Z4I8M6:4HP63>I9>64GI=HI8M6L52M5K:=6K546>IM>?U64OO49HIJ4P6K8@6>236H>2=46M2K?=6:IM>H6Z46 Z4HH456K9>I4J4@T6K8@6@4H45:I846928=4[<4894=6O25682H6:44HI8M6H>46M2K?=D6\26?KH456H>K86NL5I?6QP6R]RWP6 H>46FG49<HIJ46C2::IHH446K8@6;2<=I8M6NM489U6=>K??64K9>6O25:<?KH46ZK=4?I846K8@6HK5M4H6:4H5I9=6 ZK=4@6286I8L<H6K8@65492::48@KHI28=6O52:6H>4614K@45=>IL6EKZ?4T654?4JK8H6C2<8HU6=HKOOT6K8@6 =HKY4>2?@45=P6I89?<@I8M6=45JI946L52JI@45=6928H5K9H4@6H26L52JI@46=45JI94=6?IY46H>2=46H26Z46O<8@4@6ZU6 H>46HKG6I:L2=4@6ZU6H>I=6^5@I8K894PKOO25@KZ?46>2<=I8M6@4J4?2L45=P6K8@6548H456L52H49HI286 25MK8I_KHI28=D6`52M5K:=6O<8@4@6ZU6H>46HKG6I:L2=4@6ZU6H>I=6^5@I8K8946=>2<?@6928H5IZ<H46H26 K9>I4JI8M6H>46M2K?=6=HKH4@6I86LK5KM5KL>6N62O6H>I=6=49HI286ZU6@4:28=H5KHI8M6L52M54==6O52:6H>46 ZK=4?I846:4H5I9=6H23K5@6HK5M4H6:4H5I9=D aD b2564K9>6M2K?6O2563>I9>6H>46HK5M4H6:4H5I96>K=682H6Z4486K9>I4J4@6K=62O6a494:Z456SQP6 R]S]P6H>46FG49<HIJ46C2::IHH446=>K??6:KY465492::48@KHI28=6H26H>46X2K5@62O6c<L45JI=25=6K8@6H>46 ;2<=I8M6NM489U6H2654@I549H6O<8@=6H26256K3KU6O52:6=L49IOI96L52M5K:=D67O6K8U62O6H>46HK5M4H6:4H5I9=6 >KJ4682H6Z4486K9>I4J4@P6H>46FG49<HIJ46C2::IHH446=>K??65492::48@654K??29KHI28=6K:28M6C2<8HU6 L52M5K:=6K8@6K:28M6;2<=I8M6NM489U6L52M5K:=P654=L49HIJ4?UP62O6Z4H34486RDWd6K8@6Wd62O6H>46 H2HK?6K??29KHI286H264K9>62O6H>46C2<8HU6256H>46;2<=I8M6NM489UD6

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

 



 




 











!

"


#




 











$

$

%


 
  
!
$ 
 $

$


&




#




 









"


!




 




$

$

$

"


'


 






$


 #




#


 




!"
!




"



(




 

 

)

"*$













! 



 "

 
"

$
"$









$

$
+%""














 "$


 







 
"


"

!











 
$






 


"









 

 
! 
"

+



 






 
$






 










!"



$

#




 





*'%, -' )%.%'/0 *-1*  
2


1
$



$






"
 
""



$
!  

"

!


 
3 456 '



" 
 2


1
$







$




 $


"
!

7 856 '


 
"
!$
9
 
#
("
 2


1
$

"

!

$


"

 7


:56 '

"







"
$


!




 






  " 

!




2


1
$



(




$


"
$

$
 
#
  





!$





#


"
 

"
!


"



!

$


) '



"
 
""





!$





$



"


 $ 
#


 
 
;



'

 
 
;







!$

$






  

)

"*$











!

$




$



$

 

 


$




"
!


$

#
<







 
,=,%


 
 $


&



 
 
;



#$



"



"



$
 


 
 



.


$'




.








*



 

 !


 '


!



!
 


$



$

 

"

 $










 '
 
 !



#


!


 


!$

"


 $

#


 *

 
   -*
$

='


!








!

(



 

$


"
$

$
 
#
 





!$







#



 "
 

"
!


"



!

$


 * 

 

=" !


!

"





$

 
$

"

">


"
$


"


.* 

2


 # 

 




$




!




 
  !
!
""

 
" 



 

 






> 

.* 

2

%
$



#
    
"

$$
$


! 




!



"



"
$



 ""







 






#





#



"






 "


>




16.A.b
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

 





 

 




 






 
 

 






 






!











  
 "



 
 #




 



$
 


%






 


&
 
' 





&





%



#










&
%


&

#


&


&











(

 
 
(





(



(

%


 
(




%

 



 


)  




&   

 













!





  
 *++






  




 












  
 #




 



 


 

# 


 










  
 


  &



&






,

,


!




 


-



-
 




 











 !

%





 
.
 






&

 






 *++



 "
 


#





 






-



-$/


#


 

 







*0




 





 










 
 



*





  


&

&
%






 ,




-



-/

 




 




 


















 



1

%





 



1

%





&


%
 




 



 




 
&





%



#










&
%


&

#


&
 

&











(

 
 
(





(



(

%


 
(




%

 



 



123)456271)8 3  3
2#

%



%




9










 

#







 

 ,

 

&
 
,



 3







 







 
2#

%





 

 &





 





  

 '
:;< )4463)44=43),)3>?@ABCDE@FBGHIBGBJKBG BGGLBDKMBDLBAENGBJKGHBAN@OLPEGGNMBAENGBGHEIOPNMKIKGA; QFKBJKGHB@FNLDHOPENPEAERKEGAKPGBDBGHKSAKPGBDKMBDLBAENG@AFBAAK@A AFKTBL@BDEIOBTANUEGMK@AIKGA@NGAFKHK@EPKHNLATNIK@;?MBDLBAENG@ IL@ABHHEAENGBDDVEGTDLHKBAFEPHOBPAVKMBDLBANP@KDKTAKHAFPNLJFB PKWLK@AUNPOPNON@BD@;?MBDLBAENG@IL@AEGTDLHKMNETK@XEAFPKDKMBGA DEMKHKSOKPEKGTKY Z;< 3741!724>?@ABCDE@FIKAPET@AFBATNG@EHKPAFKUKB@ECEDEAVNU HBABTNDDKTAENGBGHTNGGKTAANAFKJNBD@NUAFE@[PHEGBGTK;QFK\NLGAV @FNLDHOPNMEHK@LUUETEKGA@ABUUEGJUNPPK@KBPTF]KMBDLBAENG]HBAB IBGBJKIKGA]HBABEGAKJPBAENG]BGHINGEANPEGJNUAFKOPNJPK@@NU KMBDLBAENG@]ANOPNMEHKTKGAPBDERKHOPNJPBINMKP@EJFA;QFK\NLGAVXEDD IB^KOKPUNPIBGTKIKAPET@OLCDETDVBMBEDBCDKY _;< )42!24243=)31\NGHLTABLHEA@UNTL@KHNGAFKPKHLTAENGNU FNIKDK@@GK@@BGHNAFKPJNBD@K@ABCDE@FKHLGHKPAFE@[PHEGBGTKBGH OPK@KGAAFK@KUEGHEGJ@ANAFK?SKTLAEMK\NIIEAAKKBGHANNAFKPFNL@EGJ BGHFNIKDK@@GK@@NMKP@EJFACNHEK@Y

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

 











!"#!$%&'#(#&!)*)+,&(+,)&-(&!"#) ,&*#!).&*/0&1/23/!" 4/'# #)/)&/''&**)+"/)/52 !"#!$%&'#(#&!)*/!").&#,&6/
/)#+! (/,)!&,*)+* ((+,)'++,"#!/)&"*&,6#'&"&
#6&,23(+
#'2(
/!!#!$3).& &6/
/)#+!/$&!"/3/!"/!2!&&"*/**&**0&!)*7+).&&-)&!)4&/*#5
&3 ).&8+ !)21#

,&9 #,& !"#!$%&'#(#&!)*3'+!),/')+,*3/!"*&,6#'& (,+6#"&,*)+,&(+,)&-(&!"#) ,&*/!"+).&,:&20&),#'*#!/ !#4+,0 0/!!&,; <

=


>?@A

B?C
D@D
CAE
A
DBCFGAEAE
B?C
DDHI??
>C
A>@D
C

>JHK
DAE
C>

LAH?>FIA?C MNOPNQRSTQUL
C?AE
LC>CBF?
IV
C>
AF
I?CAHG>@D
CAE
A CID>FE?FCB
C>E?VDFFF
WIFFHFAVFXAE
A@D
CV
HF
W
F AE
B?C
D@D
CAEFFIA?C

FE
B?C
D@D
CFE?D> FA
JDFE
B?C
DB?
DF
C>?JYIAWFA?
>IE?VDFFCFF
C> CI

FAEF@@DH?L
LL?
>
JDE?FCBXGEIEB?
DF
C>?JYIAWF

I?CFFACAGAEAEB?
DFFA
JDFE>C>
FIA?CZ?LAEF 
>C
CIE
[IAW?VVAAFE
DD
I?VVC>XCI?CFDA
A?C GAE
@@
?@

A?CAH
BCIF
C>>@

AVCAFX
C>AE?CAHFE
DD W
D
A
C>
>?@AXGAEFIEIE
CBF
FA>VF
@@
?@

AXVA
IF C?D
A
AE
C
@
D\XONOM
] K?D>AG?@JDIDFACCB
C>D

CCBFFF?CF
IEH

A?
@?
A?C
W
D
JD>
A
?C@
IW>
C>V
BCBE?VDFFCFFF
WI
C>
LL?
>
JDE?FCBC>FCAE?CAH
^ _
`?CB?CBI?VVCAH>I
A?CLL?
AF?CA?@IFCID>CBJAC?A DVA>A?AEC>L?
E?VDFFCFFF
WIF
C>
LL?
>
JDE?FCBC AE?CAH
C>AEB?
DFX?JYIAWF
C>@
?B
FF?LAE
B?C
D@D
C

>JHAEFFIA?C
 EIAaCFb?W
FBEAI?VVAAI

A>JHAEK?FCB
BCIH@
F
CAA? =?W
CVCA?>FIA?CcZd\eFE
DD?W
FAEK?FCB
BCIHbF[@C>A
F?LAE@
?I>F ?LAEA
[V@?F>JHAEF
>C
CIXI?CFFACADHGAEAEK?FCB
BCIHbF
BD
A?CF

d 
f
f?
@
@?FF?LAEF
>C
CIg
 h
II?CA
JDAHX
A
X
C>
F

IEiV
CFAE@
@?FFCV

A>C @

B

@Ef?LFIA?CP
 h
LL?
>
JDK?FCB
C>
WCA?CiV
CFAE@
@?FFCV

A>C @

B

@EK?LFIA?CP
 hEL
[IAWLLI
iV
CFAE?F
CBDF?CAHEL
[IAW LLI
?
AE
>FBC
 h?V@
ECFWK?VDFFCFF

WIFiV
CFAE@
@?FFCV

A>C @

B

@E?LFIA?CP

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)


 











 
 



 






!"  
"#$%$&


 











#



 











#




 





 



'










 
 






#



  


#











(


#















'
#






)
















 

* * 
+




 
#
, 
#
-# 
#

#
 
















 

 )

'


 









 


. ,

'




 


 

 


&
, 

/







 



 






!"  
"#$%$&




  


0
1







 
 


 #

 

#


#


 

#

#












 


#




 





 




' , 
2
 



 


 

  


&
3 

* 




 


 

  -


&
4 0
', 


,



 

5%%675
+/'
''89:'*)+(
)9:/;/+:
/')::-9/< 
/'):" )2+/'=-/) 


-










 > 





!!%








)

#


  






0

/'):7 29+2)/
)








0
#


#




















 


?
 /










   



 


1
#




#








 

>

 +
 @/




6$"A%!

 *




 




#



  



 


 





























#


 





# 0


 

 



0B
 

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

   




 
 


 
 



 




  

  !"
#$ 
!
%


 


 
 !&"" !&
'

 $ 
!  (


)

 * 
 
+


 
 
, )



 





 






 


 





$ 

 
 


 
 





 
 


-

.

/
-
   








 


 

0 



 
 
 

$ 
! 
%


 

1 

 
 


 





 







+






+)
  $



 2

3

  



 


)

 +
4
0 

 





+

  
4


 
)

 





+) 
  $



2

3

  


 
 
   -
-

.




2 

 
 


 
+




 

 +
4









+
4


 





 $ 
!
%


 
4

(



 

 
 



4





4

(

+

5







+,
  





* 

-16*7
'*7%3869-31 


 

4
)
  
  $



2

3

 


 
  



 

 

 


* 
:
 
4  
)


 
  $



2

 3

 
 


 

4 






 



 

 


+

 
)
 

0
 


 
 
-16*7

%37-36*7-3;%312

  



  +






)
 4


+)





 

 
 

 

 
 )
$
 

'"<






)
 




  +






)

  
 
 )



 


 * 

-16*7
!/31*2-3/12





* 
4
 



 






+




 



 +






)

 
 

+)

 


==



  


 
 
)==



  












 

 
) 

4





+,








4





  
 
)


6



 







+


 
-
 





+


4





 

 








+








 
+



 +


+)
   $



2

3

 

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)













!


 "#
$


 $
 


%
&
"
'
 '
 

$!
&



'

!
&

(
!
&

!
& 
 "#
$


 $
 

!
 




&
)
*+
&

'

&

 


'

''
'$!
!'(

"
,
$
"

$
-


'

$

"!'
&

'

,
!'(



!



.
%/
0
/1 
0

23


,
 (!!


!
!

 &




 
,

 ( 
&
/

4 &
%( 
5 &

($
!
 
 !#
''
&

 ( 
&
/

6

"
,
 
4))
7 &
%( 
5 &

($
!
 
 !



! !
!

!


&

!

 $"
&$''


& 




*
28 

%/
0

23
 %
22
0



! "

 ( 
&
/

&
%( 
5 &

($
!
 
 !9

3(


&
'& 


!

&!



"
"
#



&

 $

''


$
$!
& 
: ,(#

$
$ 
''
 



!
,9

;< 
, !
=>

$!



&

'
&


  ''#

$#

$
#


 $ 
&


&
'& ?
@;<

$'
&

$
$ 
, $'!
A$
 



B


"

 $




"
#
&&#


'

 &




"

'& 
%

&

!
0
!
 #

& 
"

&$ 
!


!
 

 
&

!

;< 
 
 #
'$!"#

$
 
'

'
!

 
&"


 

$!
&


&
'& #
,

$'
&

$
$ 
, $'!


 9
C;<
/ (!


 
&



,



'#
 "#
$


 $
 
&
"
'
 '
 

,
, $'!
 
,




&



,'
$
'#
 "#
$


 $
 


$
-





$!

 ( 
&
/

&
%( 
5 &

($
!
 
 !#
?
D;<



,



'#
 "#
$


 $
 
&
"
'
 '
 

,
, $'!
 


$
-





$!

!
 ( 
&

 !

E;< 
 
4F)
#
4F)5
6


'

 &7#
4F

#
4F
*#
4F
F#
4FGF

4H5H
&

($
!
 
 !

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

 
























 




!"
#







$

%




$






$
% 

&







$




'
$$









 (
'







)*+%,-




 
%






















.),



/
 0









102345
6178243719/2712
:
&



 




.
7'
(
0

%





:
&
 
;

$3


102345.1<186234#41<0=/234 # 
(



&&



(
( &

$(

(&

$
0



$$$%$
 
$%


$



$>
/

&=

/(= 

 &

$>
&





(
 

(&


&
&

&



(




&?

!" 






$%





& 

%












&

$

0
$ &



$
 ('$



&&








 


$



$
 
%/
%

$




'
&
@!" 



$




 

 



%




%$
'
$
 
$




%

$
'
$$


 




&



-




 


%
'
$





?
A!"B

')


&&
',C 






0
5)
&&
 
 D,
'
 
E0

%


 
& 

5D55
6/0

%
 

&
 '



 

 '
 + )
&&
 
FGD,
E0

$





>
>



$


 

$

C
$%

$$
%
 

%H%






I

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)






















































 














 


!
" #


































$




























 
%


!
& '































































$




















 
%


!
 (











)*+


),+

 













































































 


























 


$



!
-! #



$








$



 
%

















 













.

 #



























$

















$



!
/ %

 












 































$





































































 
0



1

0











!
# 

$









$







2*22


2*22!3



4 




#$
-




0


-
!
" 5



 






 










$




























 
%


!
& 5










$






 
































 










































$



















 
%


!
 (











)*+


),+

 























$






 






















































16.A.b
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

 



 







 







 



















 

 











 

! 





"





 #






# 





 











 

 


! 

 




! 
$



#



 

 




 
 














 


#


#





 







  


% 


 








! 





 
#

 


& '(







! 
)



 


#
#

#

*




+



  
 
,

-







./// 
#!

0
#

 1



,


# 









2-.--
#

 3

4  
,













 !

05







67./ 
#

1



,

8
  





"





 #





 
















#  


 ! 

! (


+



 






  
   

 




 #
 

 
 







#
 

  
3 -9
#!

2
#

:


8 
,


 












#



 








 

#


 
+





 
;,8<=>-7(?>!?>8;(

 

"
 



##





#
 =


3 -
#!

2
#

:


8 
,


 


 
 






 
3 -93 -
#!

2
#

:


8 
 ,



 
3 -93 -
#!

2
#

:


8 
,

 

 



 
#
=









 




  





##





# 



=


;,8<=>-6>@=<><>A,=BB,8<=>C=:D<!!> >
+


 
# 






" 





 





 
 

; 



,
 
 
##


#

; 



,
 


 

+








=


3 -9
#!

2
#

:


8 
 ,


# 

 
# 
"







;,8<=>2/;1:(D<B<8E<#



#
=





 




#





 









#

=




 

#












 





##








 
 

 

##










#

 

F


=


 
 


 





#?

G
;,8<=>2-CC,8<1!(88
=












#

 ! 
 


 

 $

##





16.A.b
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)





 











!

 ""#




$"

"
!


%

&

%
'
"(
"

)*+,-./012*3*45,-./67.4+.48-/*97:,*25;<=;>?@@A7BCB?;B>?D,>E>@FA? +ADB=BG@FA?0HI2J
K@LB@>E<>@B>;@LA<FMBDNO@LF=+L>P@B<=L>QQ?A@NBGA?=FDB<BDRA<P;<PA=B= AR@LBGASNF?BD<>@BQFSF@B=@>NQF=LBDNO7BCB?;B>?D,>E>@FA?+ADB=BG@FA?0T
2
2


'

U
 

V
W
X 

Y
Z[
 
XZ

Z
"

[
%

\
#%#"



%

"
%
'
"(





 ""#]


"


#
%%#
%

"
[
%



^
"
#

"
"
 ""#
"
!
"

 "(
!
"


#

 ""#
$
" #
!$

(
 "#
%






[
%




# %

 ""#
"

'
"(
"
 ]
$
!"
#"(

#



 ""#
$

 



_

Z'` a


[
%




!
("




"
#

"

%

 ""#]
$#

b
%%#
$"
 

"

!#^

c
%
 ""#
%

"
%
'
"(

#
("

]
"
d

!

# 
%
#"e
b"(
"



$
%

""
" 

 ""#f
"
[

$
%#

[
%

\]
%

#
%%#\]

"


#\
"
 e"\
$b
"



""(

#"
%

 ""#

#"(





)*+,-./0I2)5*/9-/gh-4-,:,-./2,LBiACB<?SB?@=PB?DF?iQFSF@>@FA?=FSPA=BDA?@LB +A;?@O>?D@LBjA;=F?i:iB?GONO><@FGQB3---8AR@LB+>QFRA<?F>+A?=@F@;@FA?><BLB<BNO F?G<B>=BDF?>SA;?@==;RRFGFB?@@APB<SF@@LBBEPB?DF@;<BAR@LBP<AGBBD=AR@LB@>EFSPA=BDNO @LF=.<DF?>?GBRA<@LBP;<PA=B==@>@BDLB<BF?2 )*+,-./02-457.k-/g7*+7l-,4*/,:/97*,*/,-./.6j.4*h*))/*)) )*7k-+*:/957*k*/,-./m.7n*7)2 :2 :QQGA?@<>G@=R;?DF?i=AGF>Q=B<CFGB=PA=F@FA?=KF?GQ;DF?iN;@?A@QFSF@BD@A LASBQB==?B===B<CFGB=>?DBCFG@FA?P<BCB?@FA?oA<pB<=KRF?>?GBDNO@LB@>EFSPA=BDNO@LF= .<DF?>?GBS;=@q
2r )B@=;RRFGFB?@P>OSB?@<>@B=@AB?>NQBGA?@<>G@A<=@AP>Oo>iB=>QFi?BD oF@LP;NQFG>?DP<FC>@BS><pB@GA?DF@FA?=s 02r :QQAo>SB?DSB?@=K>=?BBDBDK@AP<ACFDB@L>@F?GB?@FCB=>?Do>iB F?G<B>=B=RA<GA=@ARQFCF?i=FSFQ><@A@LA=BARRB<BD@A+A;?@O=@>RR>?DtA< hA=:?iBQB=jASBQB==)B<CFGB=:;@LA<F@O=@>RR><B>Q=A>C>FQ>NQB@A =B<CFGBP<ACFDB<>?DP<BCB?@FA?oA<pB<=@>RRs 12r :QQAo>??;>Q>Du;=@SB?@=@A<BRQBG@GA=@vARvQFCF?i>Du;=@SB?@=K F?G<B>=B=F?>DSF?F=@<>@FCB>QQAo>?GB=K>?DAPB<>@FA?>QGA=@GL>?iB=

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)



 







 

 












  

 


 







!

 

 



"
#

 



 







$



  











% &'('( ) 






 
$*


 




+



  












 *





 
 








$











$

,
 

 - 




 
 



.


 


 





 
 $

 











) 
 

 

$
 
 



 







 

/

 
, 


$




*



 







$

#
#

 
0 -


 




  

 
 



.


% &'('(1
) 2




)
2,
/




 


$


 




 
 






 
 
















$

 
 






$ 

  



$ 







3456789:;<=58936>?56789:@8>A= B= 7C:DE:CFG:DHCGHC:IJ:CFDE:EGKCDIH:CI:GHKILMNOG:CFG:PGQGRISTGHC:IJ:RIKNR:UIV: ISSIMCLHDCDGE:NHP:KNMGGM:SNCFWNXE:DHCI:CFG:VLDRPDHO:NHP:KIHECMLKCDIH:CMNPGEY:DHKRLPDHO:VLC:HIC: RDTDCGP:CI:NSSMGHCDKGEFDS:NHP:SMGZNSSMGHCDKGEFDS:SMIOMNTE= [= BHX:KIHECMLKCDIH:IM:MGFNVDRDCNCDIH:SMIUGKC:MGKGDQDHO:JLHPDHO:IM:JDHNHKDHO:JMIT: CFDE:8MPDHNHKGY:DHKRLPDHO:VLC:HIC:RDTDCGP:CI:N:SMIUGKC:IJ:JGWGM:CFNH:\]:LHDCEY:EFNRR:KIHECDCLCG:N: SLVRDK:WIM^:JIM:WFDKF:SMGQNDRDHO:WNOGE:EFNRR:VG:SNDP:JIM:SLMSIEGE:IJ:5FNSCGM:_:`KITTGHKDHO:WDCF: EGKCDIH:_a;]b:IJ:cNMC:a:IJ:dDQDEDIH:;:IJ:CFG:eNVIM:5IPG=:
5= B:SMIUGKC:IJ:\]:IM:TIMG:LHDCE:DE:GRDODVRG:CI:MGKGDQG:JLHPDHO:IM:JDHNHKDHO:JMIT:CFDE: 8MPDHNHKG:IHRX:DJ:NRR:KIHECMLKCDIH:NHP:MGFNVDRDCNCDIH:DE:ELVUGKC:CI:CFG:5DCX:IJ:eIE:BHOGRGE: dGSNMCTGHC:IJ:cLVRDK:@IM^E:cMIUGKC:eNVIM:BOMGGTGHC:;];]Z;]f]:DJ:CFG:SMIUGKC:DE:WDCFDH:CFG:5DCX: IJ:eIE:BHOGRGEY:IM:CFG:5ILHCXWDPG:5ITTLHDCX:@IM^JIMKG:BOMGGTGHC:GgGKLCGP:VX:CFG:5FDGJ: 4gGKLCDQG:8JJDKGM:IH:hLHG:aY:;];f:DJ:CFG:SMIUGKC:DE:GREGWFGMGY:IM:NHX:ELKKGEEIM:CI:GDCFGM:NOMGGTGHC=:
d= iIM:SLMSIEGE:IJ:EGKCDIHE:;<:NHP:;j:IJ:CFDE:8MPDHNHKGY:CFG:HLTVGM:IJ:LHDCE:TGNHE: CFG:TNgDTLT:HLTVGM:IJ:LHDCE:NLCFIMDkGP:DH:NH:GHCDCRGTGHC:OMNHCGP:VX:CFG:RNHP:LEG:SGMTDCCDHO: NLCFIMDCX:JIM:N:PGQGRISTGHC:SMIUGKCY:MGONMPRGEE:IJ:WFGCFGM:KIHECMLKCDIH:IM:MGFNVDRDCNCDIH:SMIKGGPE: DH:SFNEGE:IM:SMIUGKC:IWHGMEFDS:DE:PDQDPGP=:

16.A.b
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: 16 Item - Measure A - Text (6655 : Support Measure A for November 2024 Election)

  





 






  !


"#$%&"'"()



)*+


 ,
*
 

-





*)
)





*+



 .

*











 



/*+



 !





) 


  *
0

12
)3

!
 



/*+


4)


/



5
*







   


 

6424
+


 




 


*




 7


!*

"8#'$89:!


 "#(




;













-


<=>?@ABCD>E FC@CGHFH@AI>FF?AAHHFCJDE?@GC@CIA?>@?@C@JI>KEA>LI>FMHAH@A=KE?NO?IA?>@CGC?@NAC@ HFMB>JHEAPCALC?BNA>I>FMBJQ?APAPHBCD>ENAC@OCEONEHRK?EHOK@OHEAP?NSEO?@C@IHT / U4








!




)
*+
 



 
 4
/



5
*

*+

*)




;-

!



 3




!




!



)
APHVHNAHE@WACAHNXHG?>@CBY>K@I?B>L YCEMH@AHEN)
*+4
Z%

















 

-