1 David Yakobson
From: Noma Boardmember <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 12:52 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oscar de la Torre; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Phil Brock; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Gleam Davis; David White; Douglas Sloan Cc: Nancy Coleman; Bruce Leddy
Subject: Oppose Item 12A - 9-24-24
EXTERNAL
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
To: City Council
Re: Agenda Item 12A, City Council meeting of Sept. 24, 2024 From Bruce Leddy, Chair of NOMA
Re: OPPOSE Council action on “minor revision” to SB9, Request that it be REMOVED for full discussion and public comment
Dear City Council,
In the opinion of NOMA's Board, the revisions considered in this evening's Agenda Item 12A are far from "minor" revisions. They will extend the provisions of SB9 beyond the state's intention, allowing corporations rather than individual owners to take advantage of SB9 multi-unit development.
We ask that this item be pulled from consideration until such time as the Council and public can fully consider the implications.
Thank you,
Bruce Leddy
NOMA'S Next Meeting: SPECIAL DAY, THUR. OCTOBER 10TH
at 7PM on ZOOM
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
2 https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81526517066
smnoma.org
[email protected]
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
1 David Yakobson
From: Greg Orshansky <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 5:18 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: "City Council 9/24/24 agenda item #12A - Stanford neighbors lawsuit"
EXTERNAL
Hello, I have lived in Santa Monica since 1998, went to Santa Monica high school and my children have all gone through the public schools at Santa Monica (currently).
I strongly oppose corporations or out of state LLC from getting SB9 lot splits on empty lots - not legal by the way the statute was written and certainly not the intent. I support the lawsuit by the Stanford neighbor’s and currently live on Stanford Street.
Greg Orshansky
310-357-7753
Sent from my iPhone
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
1 David Yakobson
From: Tricia Crane <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 11:27 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oscar de la Torre; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Phil Brock; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Gleam Davis; David White; Douglas Sloan Subject: Agenda Item 12.A - OPPOSE Council any action on “minor revision” to SB9
EXTERNAL
To: City Council
Re: Agenda Item 12A, City Council meeting of Sept. 24, 2024 From Tricia Crane, Chair of Northeast Neighbors
Re: OPPOSE Council action on “minor revision” to SB9, Request that it be REMOVED for full discussion and public comment
Dear City Council,
On behalf of the residents of all R1 neighborhoods and in the interest of an honest and fair implementation of SB9, this Council must direct staff to remove the proposed “minor revision” (see that language embedded below) from Agenda Item 12A.
There is nothing “minor” about this proposed “cleanup” given that residents are challenging the legality of the proposed SB9 project on Lipton and Stanford.
We ask that this be pulled out for full discussion and not be included as an acceptable “clarification” until the impact and implications are fully explained and discussed.
Thank you
Tricia Crane
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
2 Item 12-A
September 24, 2024
Item 12-A
September 24, 2024