Written Comments — Santa Monica City Council, December 17, 2024

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
1 David Yakobson
From: Dima <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 1:09 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; Attorney Mailbox; councilmtgitems Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 11A for City Council Meeting today 12/17/2024

EXTERNAL
Dear members of the City Council and City Attorney,
Given tonight’s DDA discussion and decision regarding the proposed affordable housing development on Euclid Street and 14th Street, the neighborhood would like to formally share our key requests to be addressed with the developer and City staff.:

1. Parking & Euclid Court alley access
o Public Parking Requirement: The original RFP explicitly intended to maintain public parking. The complete removal of public parking threatens the viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses and residents. As you know, this has been the most prominent concern expressed during all community meetings, and unfortunately, we have not yet received a clear answer from the staff.
o New parking restrictions are needed to protect R4 zones from overflow. o There is a critical need to address traffic flow through Euclid Court alley, where additional ingress and egress points through the parking lot will be removed.

2. Community and Neighborhood Safety
o A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" between the Developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and residents of the neighboring community is needed.
o On-site property management during business hours with 24/7 emergency contact availability is necessary.
o 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term requirement) o Additional street lighting on 1100 & 1200 Euclid Street & 14th Street.

There are no light standards mid-block, making the street dark and unsafe.
o Daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas. o 24-hour response for:
 Graffiti removal
 Encampment issues
 Safety concerns
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
2 o Clear protocols for neighbors to report any issues and an escalation protocol to be established.
o A zero-tolerance policy for illicit drug use, loitering, and trespassing with clear enforcement procedures.
o Annual community meetings with the neighbors are essential for the wellbeing of all residents. o Quarterly property inspection with reports to the City.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Best regards,
Dima Volovik on behalf of Mid-Wilshire Neighbors.

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
3 David Yakobson
From: nancy hall <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 1:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Santa Monica Neighbors
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 11 A - December 17, 2024 meeting

EXTERNAL
December 17, 2024
RE: Agenda Item 11 A
Dear City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development:

Architectural Approval:

The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board Parking & Access:
o The original RFP explicitly required maintaining public parking. Why was this requirement abandoned? o This project threatens the viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses and causes overflow into R4 zones.

New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. o Traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to prevent further congestion.

Safety Requirements:
o 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term). o Additional street lighting on 1100 & 1200 Euclid St. and 14th St. o Install security cameras at all entrances/exits with 30-day retention. o Daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas. o Mandatory 24-hour response for graffiti removal, encampment issues, trash, and safety concerns.

Community Protection:
o A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and the community.
o Zero tolerance for illicit activities, with transparent reporting and enforcement procedures. ◦ Annual community meetings and quarterly property inspections submitted to the city.

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
4 These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood.

Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely
Nancy Hall

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
1 David Yakobson
From: Deborah Maddis <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 11:55 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: VOTE YES - ITEM 11A – Development Authorization for housing on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire

EXTERNAL
Subject: ITEM 11A – Development Authorization for Housing on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire Dear Santa Monica City Council,
As a 40 year resident of Santa Monica, I strongly urge your vote for the housing development proposed by Hollywood Community Housing Corporation on three Santa Monica sites at 1217 Euclid Street, 1211-1217 Fourteenth Street, and 1402 Wilshire. The need for affordable housing has never been greater since the passage of Costa-Hawkins.

These model housing projects are designed to promote the health and well-being of residents and community while contributing to the economic growth and beautification of Santa Monica. The selected housing developer and services team, Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and The People Concern are highly qualified to create and sustain innovative permanent supportive housing for the most needy residents of our community.

Your support is much appreciated!
Thank you,
Debby
Deborah Maddis, MPH
Consultant
Integrating Healthcare and Housing
(310) 968-9903
[email protected]
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
2 David Yakobson
From: Hajar Muqtasid St. Claire <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 11:53 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Lana Negrete Subject: Item 11A

EXTERNAL
Development Authorization for housing on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire Dear Santa Monica City Council:

I write to strongly endorse authorizing the affordable housing development by Hollywood Community Housing Corporation on three Santa Monica sites at 1217 Euclid Street, 1211-1217 Fourteenth Street, and 1402 Wilshire Boulevard.

As long as the provider of these housing projects can support unhoused residents of Santa Monica as a priority, I fully support this endorsement. Equity, equality and supporting historically left out populations should also be a priority when awarding these contracts.

The developer team adjusted the sites and site plans in significant ways to respond to multiple suggestions raised in community meetings that I attended. I believe the resulting proposals repreexactly good basis for what we should strive for as a city that upholds its commitment to providing more equitable and compassionate housing alternatives. Please vote to support this project.

Respectfully,
Hajar Muqtasid St. Claire
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
3 David Yakobson
From: Debra Shepherd <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 10:29 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 11A

EXTERNAL
Good evening council members,
I would like to support the housing development at Euclid and 14th and Wilshire Boulevard. I have participated in the zoom meetings conducted by the Hollywood Community Housing Corporation. I believe that this organization has thoughtfully considered the project and carefully considered the input provided by the community members that have participated in the process. As a housing voucher holder and resident advisory board member, I find that the project meets the needs of the population that it has been designed to accommodate. I’m very happy with the design of the buildings and I find that they fit in well within the existing neighborhood.

However, I am very disappointed with the way that some of the neighbors have comported themselves. Their behavior has been horrendous. They have even suggested that they should get to pick the tenants for the building.

That’s ridiculous. This is not a practice that happens in any jurisdiction, nor should it. I believe that some type of privacy element should be included on the first level to allow the residents to have comfort from overly zealous neighbors who believe that they have a right to have the residents under scrutiny and surveillance.

I have experience with hostile neighbors as a voucher holder. One of them used to call the police on my family, in an effort to get us evicted. I’m still here, and she’s not. I don’t want to see other people go through the hostility and discrimination that my family and I experienced.

Regards,
Debra Shepherd
Ocean Park resident
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
4 David Yakobson
From: Lopez, Marlene Nancy <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 10:29 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item Number 11A (Development authorization on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire)

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
I write to strongly endorse authorizing the affordable housing development by Hollywood Community Housing Corporation on three Santa Monica sites at 1217 Euclid Street, 1211-1217 Fourteenth Street, and 1402 Wilshire Boulevard. This would be going in the right direction towards affordable housing that dignify residents. Please vote to support this project.

Yours truly,
Marlené Nancy Lopez
Associate Director of Communications and Operations, cityLAB Department of Architecture & Urban Design
University of California, Los Angeles
[email protected] | (310) 936-5905
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
5 David Yakobson
From: Lynn Naliboff <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 10:23 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item Number 11A (Development authorization on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire)

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members ~
I strongly support the proposed affordable housing development by Hollywood Community Housing Corporation on three Santa Monica sites at 1217 Euclid Street, 1211-1217 Fourteenth Street, and 1402 Wilshire Boulevard.

There is a desperate need for well-designed, all-affordable housing projects and these are model projects.

Please vote to support this project.

Sincerely,
Lynn Naliboff
1340 Pacific St.

Santa Monica
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
6 David Yakobson
From: Yang, Yang <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 9:42 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: ITEM 11A – Development Authorization for housing on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the affordable housing development proposed by Hollywood Community Housing Corporation on the three sites located at 1217 Euclid Street, 1211-1217 Fourteenth Street, and 1402 Wilshire Boulevard. These are exemplary projects of thoughtful, communityfocused housing designed to integrate into the surrounding area and align with the values of inclusivity and compassion that our city strives for. Please support this much-needed affordable housing project.

Sincerely,
Yang
--
Yang Yang, PhD
Associate Director of Research, cityLAB
Department of Architecture & Urban Design
University of California, Los Angeles
[email protected] | (310) 531-3169
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
7 David Yakobson
From: barrie lev y <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 9:33 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item Number 11A (Development authorization on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire)

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council:

I am writing to urge you to authorize the Hollywood Community Housing Corporation's affordable housing development on three Santa Monica sites at 1217 Euclid Street, 1211-1217 Fourteenth Street, and 1402 Wilshire Boulevard. They are one of our region’s premier non-profit developers.

The plans for these projects are wonderful, models that will fit in with the neighborhood. Support for residents will be provided by excellent service providers. The projects will offer desperately needed supportive affordable housing in apartments that dignify the residents who will live there, and which situated so that they contribute positively to the community.

The developer team adjusted the sites and site plans in significant ways to respond to multiple suggestions raised in community meetings. I believe the resulting proposals represent exactly what we should strive for as a city that upholds its commitment to providing more equitable and compassionate housing alternatives.

Please vote to support this project.

Sincerely,
Barrie Levy

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
1 David Yakobson
From: Norman Zada <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 5:49 PM
To: councilmtgitems; [email protected]
Cc: Savannah Ryan; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: 11A
A Proposal to Replace 1217 Euclid and Similar In-City Housing With Much Less Expensive and More Rewarding Construction
A $5,000/unit Proposal to End Homelessness
By Dr. Norman Zadeh
As explained below, instead of trying to construct 130 units here and there in-city ala 1217 Euclid, with the resulting parking and crime issues, the state can solve the entire homeless problem, remove all the tents from the streets, save California taxpayers billions of dollars, and make the homeless population and local merchants and residents happier than they have ever been. The solution is to build multiple ultra-low-cost centers with in-house dining and medical services on inexpensive land just outside populated areas and then fully care for each resident. The centers should provide their residents with a variety of learning options and activities – online and in-house classrooms, pools, tennis courts, game rooms, art and music studios, carpentry shops, etc. to create an environment so wonderful that residents never want to go back to the streets. As explained at lotfi-zadeh.com, by utilizing inexpensive land and low cost prefabricated construction, the cost of each housing unit would be approximately $5,000, and the annual cost of caring for each resident would be approximately $10,000.

Cost Comparison for California
California spent $24 billion over 5 years, or approximately $5 billion/year, on its homeless programs.i[1] During that period, homelessness increased by more than 20%. Had California built ultra-low-cost housing for all its homeless in 2018 and fully cared for them as we propose, assuming an average homeless population of 170,000, it would have cost California taxpayers $850 million to build housing for all 170,000 of California’s homelessii[2], and $1.7 billion a year for their care. California taxpayers would have saved more than $14 billion and completely ended homelessness five years ago.

Answers to likely concerns
Are the homes temporary or permanent? The homes are permanent. They are not tents. The structures are state of the art, weigh 150 pounds but are sturdy, cost $1,500 each, and have an estimated life of 30 years.iii[3] What about drug addicts and violent offenders? Residents will be screened for violent behavior and drug addiction. Those exhibiting violent tendencies will not be allowed at the centers. There will be separate facilities for drug addicts.

Will people want to go? It’s a choice between being hungry, cold, and sleeping on the street with no hope, vs. being fed, warm, and sleeping in your own room with multiple ways to grow and improve. Not a hard choice.

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
2 Residents can leave whenever they want so there is no downside to checking out a facility. Once the first center is built and receives rave reviews, everyone will want to live in one.

Aren’t you giving some people a free ride? Any person who leaves their low-cost unit and moves to a center will free up that unit for someone else. In other words, such “free loading” will not change the number of available low-cost units. The bottom line is that 170,000 new housing units will be built very inexpensively, all the tents will be gone from the streets, and California taxpayers will save billions of dollars.

Where might the centers be built and what would be the impact on nearby communities? The centers will be at least five to ten miles from populated areas, possibly Merced or Lancaster in California or Scio in New York State. Nearby communities are likely to benefit, as the centers will purchase much of their food and supplies from local farmers and merchants.

How long would the construction take? Once a state gets behind the program to cut through red tape, construction should take at most six months.

Would residents have an opportunity to rejoin society? Residents will be offered online classes as well as in-house classes in carpentry, auto repair, sewing, art, musical composition, cooking, etc. Residents can leave whenever they want and rejoin society with their new skills.

What would it cost to end homelessness in the United States? With an estimated 650,000 homeless nationwide, it would cost approximately $3.25 billion to build 650,000 units and around $6.5 billion a year to fully care for all the residents. That is about 1/10 of 1% of federal spending, which in 2023 was $6.2 trillion.

Below is a site plan for a 1,000-unit trial facility. Its capacity can be increased by adding blocks of units around the sides.

LOTFI ZADEH FOUNDATION
Preliminary Site Plan for 1000+ Units
840’ x 760’ – 14.65 ACRES
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
3 About the Author: Dr. Norman Zadeh (aka Zada) taught Operations Research in a visiting capacity at Stanford, UCLA, UC Irvine, and Columbia Universities between 1975 and 1983. He managed hedge funds from 1991 to 2012. His father, Lotfi Zadeh, is a computer scientist known for creating fuzzy logic and fuzzy sets.

For more information, contact Dr. Norman Zadeh at [email protected] or call 310-409-7193.

i[1] https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/california-homelessness-spending-audit-24b-five-years-didntconsistently-track-outcomes/ ii[2] Less than 170,000 units would be needed because some homeless individuals have families and each unit is large enough to hold a man and his wife, or an adult with children. iii[3] https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Hot-sale-3-in-1- portable_1600424730861.html?spm=a2700.pccps_detail.0.0.186713a0O6kuwF.

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
4 David Yakobson
From: wendie olshan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 9:23 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 11A - 12/17/2024

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development:

1. Architectural Approval: The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board.

2. Parking & Access:
◦ The original RFP explicitly required maintaining public parking. Why was this requirement abandoned? ◦ This project threatens the viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses and causes overflow into R4 zones.

New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. ◦ Traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to prevent further congestion.

3. Safety Requirements:
◦ 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term). ◦ Additional street lighting on 1100 & 1200 Euclid St. and 14th St. ◦ Install security cameras at all entrances/exits with 30-day retention. ◦ Daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas. ◦ Mandatory 24-hour response for graffiti removal, encampment issues, trash, and safety concerns.

4. Community Protection:
◦ A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and the community.
◦ Zero tolerance for illicit activities, with transparent reporting and enforcement procedures. ◦ Annual community meetings and quarterly property inspections submitted to the city.

These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your
attention.

Sincerely,
W. Olshan
50 yr. + resident of Santa Monica
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
1 David Yakobson
From: Sharon Angela <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 8:22 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: stop

EXTERNAL

PLEASE STOP THIS CONSTRUCTION FROM DESTROYING MY NEIGHBORHOOD

I BEG YOU TO DO SOMETHING AGAINST THIS
Thank you
Sharon Currytto
resident of 14th street
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
1 David Yakobson
From: Joan Ling <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 8:09 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Dana Cuff
Subject: Item Number 11A (Development authorization on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
I am the former executive director of Community Corporation of Santa Monica (1991-2011) and have repeatedly seen the affordable housing project approval process played out over and over again in the city. People don't like change, they are afraid of a possible diminution of their quality of life, etc. But, all the projects we have built under my watch have been a net asset to the neighborhoods - great design, attentive property management, responsive to neighbors' concerns. The concerned neighbors changed their minds once the housing was built and occupied.

The affordable housing development by Hollywood Community Housing Corporation on three Santa Monica sites at 1217 Euclid Street, 1211-1217 Fourteenth Street, and 1402 Wilshire Boulevard is no different. These are model housing projects, designed to fit in with the neighborhood, with resident support provided by excellent service providers, by one of our region’s premier non-profit developers. The projects will offer much needed supportive affordable housing in apartments that dignify the residents who will live there, and which are sited so that they contribute positively to the community. The developer team adjusted the sites and site plans in significant ways to respond to multiple suggestions raised in community meetings.

These locations are in the site inventory submitted by the city to the state as a part of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) compliance. If not these, where?
Enough is enough. Approve them already. They represent the city's commitment to provide more equitable and compassionate housing alternatives.

Sincerely,
Joan Ling
--
Joan Ling
[email protected]
310-397-8835
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
2 David Yakobson
From: John Given <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 8:07 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 11A Housing on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire

EXTERNAL
When the City declared the subject properties surplus in 2022 and issued the RFP in 2023, the City Council made the correct decision: the parking lots can be developed with affordable housing and replacement public parking. The proposal by Hollywood Community Housing Corporation (HCHC), is responsive to that decision and the criteria set forth in the RFP. The City Council should affirm the good work completed to date by selecting HCHC as the developer and authorizing the necessary actions to expedite financing and construction of this project.

I urge your timely approval so the hard work of financing and developing the housing can begin.

JOHN GIVEN
[email protected]
310-430-1018
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
3 David Yakobson
From: AndaMiller <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 8:00 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 11A

EXTERNAL
Agenda Item: 11A
Dear City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed developments at 1217 Euclid street & 1211-1217 14th Street. The DDA should not be signed until these issues are resolved and written into the contract, failing to do so erodes public trust.

Architectural Approval: *The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board.

Parking & Access:
 The original RFP explicitly required maintaining public parking. Why was this requirement abandoned?
 This project threatens the viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses and causes overflow into R4 zones.
 New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. No new parking permits for the new residence as they have their own parking.

Safety Requirements: 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term).  Additional street lighting on 1100 & 1200 Euclid St. and 14th St.  Install security cameras at all entrances/exits with 30-day retention.  Daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas.  Mandatory 24-hour response for graffiti removal, encampment issues, trash, and safety concerns.

Community Protection:
 A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and the community.
 Zero tolerance for illicit activities, with transparent reporting and enforcement procedures.  Annual community meetings and quarterly property inspections submitted to the city.

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
4  Prioritize community welfare over expedient development These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,
Anda Miller
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
5 David Yakobson
From: Frances Anderton <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 1:26 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for housing development by Hollywood Community Housing Corporation

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council-members:

I am writing to express my support for the affordable housing development by Hollywood Community Housing Corporation on three sites at 1217 Euclid Street, 1211-1217 Fourteenth Street, and 1402 Wilshire Boulevard.

The projects will offer much needed supportive affordable housing in apartments beautifully designed by the architect Kevin Daly.

Not only will they be configured and managed to meet the security concerns of nearby residents, but the designs set a very high standard in terms of livability, emphasizing natural light, ventilation, and open gathering spaces for the tenants that will hopefully be highly beneficial.

Both Daly and HCHC have sterling track records in the design and development of affordable housing. So too does the City of Santa Monica, so I hope you will support this project that embodies the city’s values of equity, compassion and high-quality architecture and urban design.

Sincerely,
Frances Anderton
(Santa Monica resident)
Email: francesanderton.com
Mobile: 310-429-8158
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
6 David Yakobson
From: Tatiana <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 1:45 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 11A

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to share key issues and concerns related to the 14th Street project, as these directly impact our community.

Over the years, the residents and business owners in our neighborhood have made significant investments to improve and enhance the quality of life on this block. From beautification efforts to fostering a safe and vibrant environment, we have worked tirelessly to create a community we are proud of. As such, we believe the City Council not only has the ability but also the moral obligation to join us in these efforts rather than undermining them.

1. Parking & Access
• Public Parking Requirement: The original RFP was intended to maintain public parking. Why was this commitment abandoned?
• Direct Business Impact:The lack of sufficient parking threatens the viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses.
• Neighborhood Overflow:New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect R4 zones from overflow.
• Traffic Flow Concerns: It is critical to address traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys to prevent congestion and ensure safety.

2. Safety Requirements
• 24/7 Security: A mandatory 3-year term for 24/7 security guards at the 14th Street project is essential to ensure safety.
• Improved Lighting:Additional street lighting is needed on 1100 & 1200 Euclid Street and 14th Street to deter criminal activity.
• Security Cameras: Cameras must monitor all entrances and exits, with a minimum 30-day retention policy.
• Daily Maintenance:Regular sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas, is necessary to maintain a safe environment.
• 24-Hour Response Protocols: Immediate response is required for the following:

1. Graffiti removal

2. Encampment issues

3. Trash problems

4. Safety concerns
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
7 3. Maintenance Standards
(Please refer to the previously provided recommendations for this section.)

4. Community Protection
• “Good Neighbor Agreement”: A binding agreement between the Developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and neighboring residents is essential.
• Zero Tolerance Policy: Strict enforcement of a zero-tolerance policy for illicit activities, with transparent reporting and actionable procedures for residents. • Community Engagement: Annual community meetings to foster collaboration and accountability.
• Quarterly Inspections: Property inspection reports should be submitted quarterly to the city to ensure compliance with maintenance and safety standards.

We respectfully urge the Council to recognize and honor the work our community has already done to improve this block. This project must be implemented thoughtfully and responsibly to protect the safety, quality of life, and business vitality of our neighborhood.

Thank you for your attention to these critical matters.

Sincerely,
Tatiana Khmilinina
1325 Arizona Ave #202
Santa Monica CA 90404
310-800-8222
Thanks,
Tatiana
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
8 David Yakobson
From: Tatiana <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 1:45 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Yasha
Subject: Agenda Item 11A

1. Graffiti removal

2. Encampment issues

3. Trash problems
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
9 4. Safety concerns

3. Maintenance Standards
(Please refer to the previously provided recommendations for this section.)

Thank you for your attention to these critical matters.

Sincerely,
Tatiana Khmilinina
1325 Arizona Ave #202
Santa Monica CA 90404
310-800-8222
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
10 David Yakobson
From: MarieHernandez <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 9:01 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda: 11a - Euclid Street & 14th Street Housing Projects

EXTERNAL
Re: 11a
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
My name is Marie, and I’m a neighbor who cares deeply about our community. I am writing to share my concerns regarding the Euclid Street & 14th Street Housing Projects.

I am a proponent of affordable housing but, you can't just destroy people while putting it in. Everyone should benefit, so I don't understand why the city is doing it this way and treating us like we don't care. 99% of my neighbors care about affordable housing, most of us are living paycheck to paycheck. But you are going to make it even harder for us to get to work, find parking when we come home at night after a long day.

I'm also an independent business owner. I know how hard it is to get by as a small owner. I am sad and alarmed by the potential economic disruption that the 14th Street Housing Project is going to create by removing the parking. The 14th Street Parking Lot is packed every day. Most of the people who use it are going to the hospital, doctors offices and can't afford the crazy $20.00 parking rates in the doctors offices. There are tons of people who park there who are visiting their kids who are sick in the hospital. Did you know that hospital has a children's wing in it? I met a mom who has been visiting her daughter who has cancer and parks in that 14th Street lot for the past year. Parents park there because it's affordable. I don't know why the plans for parking in this building went away. As a business owner I feel for all of the businesses on Wilshire. I know the ladies in the 2 salons on Wilshire and they are worried about their clients not wanting to come there any more and losing their jobs. You can't force people to take public transportation when its not safe or not convenient. Or you are old and have a technical barrier to using the apps. My mom can't figure out how to use the apps.

I'm also worried about my safety and the safety of the senior citizens you are putting on 14th Street. It does not make sense to put regular senior citizens next to people with severe substance abuse problems and health problems. My neighbor told me that you do not have to be sober to liver there. So you are going to have drug addicts, 1 block away from a school and in a neighborhood with tons of little kids and babies. All of this lacks common sense.

These are my major concerns:
 The project threatens business viability by removing all of the parking  The Walker Parking study says that the 14th street parking lot 12 is at 108% usage, which will further strain our already congested area
 No clear plan exists to support local business accessibility Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
11 I Recommended these actions: Don't approve the DDA until these things have been done.

1. Conduct a comprehensive economic impact assessment

2. Spend the money on putting parking in both buildings to accommodate the businesse and neighbors

3. Create a "Good Neighbor Agreement" that protects the residents and kids

4. 24/7 security at the PSH housing

5. Tenants who get into the buildings have gone through treatment and are sober

6. Real accredited mental health professionals on staff 24/7

7. Architectural Plans for 14th Street need to be submitted and approved by the neighbors and ARB before you sign anything

8. Have a zero tolerance policy for drug use

9. Make sure there is an agreement to not have needles or glass pipes given out at these buildings. This is a family centric neighborhood.

Making this work requires responsible, thoughtful, collaborative planning.

Thank you for taking our community’s concerns seriously.

Sincerely,
Marie Hernandez
Mid Wilshire Neighbor
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
12 David Yakobson
From: Daphne Dennis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 8:34 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 11A Housing on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire

EXTERNAL
Councilmembers,
Congratulations to the continuing and newly elected Council members.

I urge you to support the affordable housing projects on your agenda designed for sites on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire Blvd. These projects have been reviewed by the community, made changes responsive to that review, and will provide much-needed affordable housing with supportive social services.

Thank you for your careful consideration of these much-needed additions to the City’s housing options for vulnerable community members.

Regards, Daphne Dennis
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
13 David Yakobson
From: JenniferSmith <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 7:47 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: 11A / 1217 EUCLID STREET / 14TH STREET PROJECT

EXTERNAL
RE:11A
Dear City Council,
I’m Jen, and I’ve lived on the 1300 block of 14th Street for decades now. This is a tight-knit community, and many of us are concerned about the future of our neighborhood and city.

As a parent living near the proposed 14th Street Housing Project, I am deeply concerned about the potential risks to our community's safety and well-being.

This project is overwhelmingly stressful to myself and my neighbors. We are worried about our kids well being, safety and mental health. It is not healthy for children to be exposed on a daily basis to individuals high on drugs. The senior affordable housing is a perfect fit for the neighborhood and the kids, but I am worried about the PSH housing that does to require any drug testing at all. Is it fair to place vulnerable seniors next to seniors who have a substance abuse problem? I learned that The People Concern gives out needles and glass pipes in their buildings. I don't think distributing these in a neighborhood with tons of kids and vulnerable seniors is safe or responsible.

The current development plan raises huge red flags:
 The parking study by Walker Consultants reveals that the 14th Street Parking Lot is already at 108% capacity
 Additional housing without adequate parking will devastate local businesses and residential parking
 Proximity to Lincoln Middle School demands stringent safety protocols.  The proposed plans lack comprehensive safety measures:
 There have been no archtitechtural plans submitted for the 14th Street project
o No provisions for 24/7 security
o Insufficient street lighting
o No clear strategy for managing potential substance-related issues Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
14 I urge you please, to delay the DDA:

1. A comprehensive safety review is completed

2. Require a detailed parking mitigation plan

3. Implement strict tenant screening processes

4. Until plans for the 14th Street project have been seen and approved by the neighbors

5. Work with SMPD to have more patrols in this neighborhood Our children's safety and our neighborhood's integrity are at stake.

Sincerely,
Jen Smith
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
15 David Yakobson
From: Dana Cuff <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 7:39 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 11A: Housing Dvlpmt on Euclid, 14th, and Wilshire

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council:

I write to strongly endorse authorizing the aƯordable housing development by Hollywood Community Housing Corporation on three Santa Monica sites at 1217 Euclid Street, 1211-1217 Fourteenth Street, and 1402 Wilshire Boulevard. These are model housing projects, designed to fit in with the neighborhood, with resident support provided by excellent service providers, by one of our regions premier non-profit developers. The projects will oƯer much needed supportive aƯordable housing in apartments that dignify the residents who will live there, and which are sited so that they contribute positively to the community. The developer team adjusted the sites and site plans in significant ways to respond to multiple suggestions raised in community meetings that I attended. I believe the resulting proposals represent exactly what we should strive for as a city that upholds its commitment to providing more equitable and compassionate housing alternatives. Please vote to support this project.

Sincerely,
Dana CuƯ
……………………………………………………………….

Dr. Dana Cuff
Director, cityLAB – UCLA
Professor, Architecture and Urban Design
Core Faculty, Urban Humanities Initiative
Rm B215-Perloff Hall UCLA
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1467
310-794-6125 office
310-804-0045 cell
……………………………………………………………………………..

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
16 David Yakobson
From: DanielCollins <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 7:14 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 11A

EXTERNAL
Re: Agenda Item 11A - (1217 Euclid Housing Project) and the (1211-1217 14th Street Housing Project)
Development Disposition Agreement (DDA)
Dear City Council,
My name is Daniel. I am writing to express serious concerns about the proposed Development Disposition Agreement (DDA) for the Euclid Street and 14th Street Housing Projects, which represents a significant financial risk to Santa Monica taxpayers. I've been going through the documents provided and noticed there seems to be quite a few documents missing from a project of this size and scope in a residential neighborhood.

Financial Concerns:

The proposed agreement contains several critical financial irregularities:

1. Misallocation of Funds
 A $13.5 million miscalculation by the developer HCHC has been identified in the DDA
The city proposes a $13,500,000 million dollar loan that includes a $6,000,000 loan to HCHC for acquiring 1402 Wilshire Boulevard property, The Unleashed building. This effectively means taxpayer dollars are being used to purchase the Unleashed building and gift it to the developer HCHC? The budget is from 2020 and have not taken into account inflation. This budget is therefore inaccurate. What are the real numbers for this project?

2. Governance and Transparency Failures
 14th Street architectural plans are not provided in any documentation  Current Budget provided is inaccurate from 2020 proposal  Current budget does not line out community feedback for 24/7 security  Addressing the future risk and shortfalls of money from the Federal government for section 8 vouchers.
 The City of Santa Monica is subsiding all 40 vouchers for the PSH housing. If the money dries up who is paying?
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
17 The proposed DDA fails to meet fundamental standards of fiscal responsibility and ethical governance:
- Violation of Original Request for Proposal (RFP) Guidelines * The original RFP prioritizing parking and resident needs in its guidelines * HCHC's selected proposal disregards all of these critical requirements * Potential violations of the Oaks and Levine Act require thorough investigation - Lack of Accountability
* No robust accountability mechanisms are in place
* Potential violation of public funds
* Circumvention of standard procurement processes
Recommendations:

As elected officials and fiscal stewards, I urge the City Council to:

1. Immediately halt the current DDA

2. Conduct a comprehensive review and audit

3. Implement stringent accountability measures

4. Protect Santa Monica taxpayers from undue financial risk and burden.

This is more than a routine project review. It is a critical test of your commitment to ethical governance, financial transparency, and responsible public resource management. Your duty is not to rubber-stamp a flawed proposal, but to critically examine its implications for our community and future of Santa Monica.

Regards,
Daniel
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
1 David Yakobson
From: Galanty 2024 account <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 1:44 PM
To: councilmtgitems; [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 6
Attachments: Santa Monica.pdf

EXTERNAL
[email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 6
Dear City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development:

Architectural Approval
The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board Parking & Access
 Reinstate the original RFP requirement for maintaining public parking  Address the threat to Wilshire Blvd businesses and potential overflow into R4 zones  Implement new parking restrictions to protect neighborhoods  Resolve traffic flow issues through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys Safety Requirements
 Provide 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term)  Install additional street lighting on 1100 & 1200 Euclid St. and 14th St.  Install security cameras at all entrances/exits with 30-day retention  Implement daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas  Mandate 24-hour response for graffiti removal, encampment issues, trash, and safety concerns Community Protection
 Develop a comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" between the developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and the community
 Enforce zero tolerance for illicit activities, with transparent reporting and enforcement procedures  Conduct annual community meetings and quarterly property inspections submitted to the city Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
2 These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your attention to these matters.

Sincerely,

Mark Galanty
1640 5th St. Suite 202
Santa Monica, CA. 90401

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Email: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 6
Dear City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development:

Architectural Approval
The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board Parking & Access
• Reinstate the original RFP requirement for maintaining public parking • Address the threat to Wilshire Blvd businesses and potential overflow into R4 zones • Implement new parking restrictions to protect neighborhoods • Resolve traffic flow issues through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys Safety Requirements
• Provide 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term) • Install additional street lighting on 1100 & 1200 Euclid St. and 14th St. • Install security cameras at all entrances/exits with 30-day retention • Implement daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas • Mandate 24-hour response for graffiti removal, encampment issues, trash, and safety concerns Community Protection
• Develop a comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" between the developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and the community
• Enforce zero tolerance for illicit activities, with transparent reporting and enforcement procedures • Conduct annual community meetings and quarterly property inspections submitted to the city These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your attention to these matters.

Sincerely, Mark Galanty
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
1 David Yakobson
From: Heidi Wulkow <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 11:35 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 11A

EXTERNAL
I’m a 24.5 year resident of Santa Monica and love living here. I do support affordable housing when it’s been done in concert with the community and takes into account the needs of all. Many of the proposed actions actually take away from residents, and seem to be missing some basic logic in terms of how plans would affect the entire community. I want to see our city retain its charm and uniqueness, and hoping we can do that without damaging what’s already here.

In addition to the points below, I would like to call out that there are some very old and beautiful trees that are at risk with these projects. Please consider that in the overall planning.

Regarding Agenda item 11A, I would like to make the following points:

1. Parking & Access
o Public Parking Requirement: The original RFP was explicitly intended to maintain public parking. Why was it abandoned?
o Direct Impact: Threatens viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses o Need new parking restrictions to protect R4 zones from overflow o The critical need to address traffic flow through Euclid Court & 14th Court alleys

2. Safety Requirements
o 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term requirement) o Additional street lighting needed on:1100 & 1200 Euclid Street & 14th Street o Security cameras monitoring all entrances/exits with 30-day retention o Daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas
o Mandatory 24-hour response for:
i. Graffiti removal
ii. Encampment issues
iii. Trash problems
iv. Safety concerns

3. Maintenance Standards

4. Community Protection
o A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the Developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and residents of the neighboring community. o Zero tolerance policy for illicit activities
o Transparent reporting and enforcement procedures for the community to use o Annual community meetings
o Quarterly property inspection reports to the city
Regards,
Heidi Wulkow
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
2 [email protected]
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
3 David Yakobson
From: Kazia Schulhof <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 11:30 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 11A

EXTERNAL
I am very concerned about the direct impact this building project will have on the residents in this neighborhood. The parking situation here is already overwhelmed and we need in fact more parking not less. The congestion this residence will cause will already overwhelm the neighborhood.

I am also deeply concerned about security walking near these facilities. Again, we already need security and protection from the current street conditions. Many of us no longer walk alone even in the early evening. Additionally, we need help with the trash, encampment issues and filth that is on this street. This building project is only going to increase the issues we experience already.

With the city building these complexes it should come with responsibility. The responsibility to provide the surrounding residents with safety, security, and clean living environment with prompt and meaningful response to any issues that should arise from the new housing. Our points are these:

Parking & Access
 Public Parking Requirement: The original RFP was explicitly intended to maintain public parking. Why was it abandoned?
 Direct Impact: Threatens viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses  Need new parking restrictions to protect R4 zones from overflow  The critical need to address traffic flow through Euclid Court & 14th Court alleys 2

1. Graffiti removal

2. Encampment issues

3. Trash problems

4. Safety concerns

3. Maintenance Standards (Section remains the same)

4.Community Protection
 A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the Developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and residents of the neighboring community.  Zero tolerance policy for illicit activities. Transparent reporting and enforcement procedures for the community to use
 Annual community meetings
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
4  Quarterly property inspection reports to the city
Sincerely,
Kezia Schulhof
1251 14th St. #202
Santa Monica, CA 90404
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
5 David Yakobson
From: George Guttman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 11:19 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 11A

EXTERNAL
We need parking.
1) Where will handicap or elderly people park and also at a reasonable cost. 2) Do not issue any parking permits on any of these developments. 3) Very concerned about safety. We are going in the wrong direction.

1.Parking & Access
 Public Parking Requirement: The original RFP was explicitly intended to maintain public parking. Why was it abandoned?
 Direct Impact: Threatens viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses  Need new parking restrictions to protect R4 zones from overflow  The critical need to address traffic flow through Euclid Court & 14th Court alleys 2

2. Safety Requirements
o 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term requirement)
o Additional street lighting needed on:1100 & 1200 Euclid Street & 14th Street
o Security cameras monitoring all entrances/exits with 30-day retention o Daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas
o Mandatory 24-hour response for:

1. Graffiti removal

2. Encampment issues

3. Trash problems

4. Safety concerns

3. Maintenance Standards (Section remains the same)

George Guttman
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
6 Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
7 David Yakobson
From: Carly Ann <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 10:30 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Addressing Key Concerns for the Proposed 14th Street Housing Project

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development to ensure it benefits our community without compromising safety, accessibility, or neighborhood integrity:

1. Architectural Review
The Development and Disposition Agreement (DDA) should not be signed until:
 Neighbors have reviewed the architectural plans.
 The Architectural Review Board has given its approval.

2. Parking and Traffic Management
The project threatens to exacerbate parking and traffic issues, which require immediate attention:
 Public Parking: Why has the original RFP requirement to maintain public parking been abandoned?
 Business Impact: The loss of parking could harm businesses on Wilshire Boulevard and cause overflow into R4 residential zones. Implementing new parking restrictions is essential to protect our neighborhoods.
 Traffic Flow: Address traffic congestion in Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys to ensure smooth flow and minimize disruptions.

3. Safety and Maintenance Measures
To protect the surrounding community, the following should be mandated:
 Security: 24/7 security guards stationed at the project site for at least three years.  Lighting: Install additional streetlights on the 1100 and 1200 blocks of Euclid Street and 14th Street.
 Cameras: Install security cameras at all entrances and exits, with footage retained for a minimum of 30 days.
 Cleanliness: Daily sidewalk cleaning for the project and surrounding areas.  Rapid Response: A 24-hour maximum response time for addressing graffiti, encampments, trash, and other safety concerns.

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
8 4. Community Protections
The project must prioritize the interests of the surrounding neighborhood:
 Good Neighbor Agreement: A formal agreement between the developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and the community should outline roles and responsibilities.  Zero Tolerance: Establish clear policies and transparent enforcement procedures for addressing illicit activities.
 Ongoing Oversight: Require annual community meetings and quarterly property inspections, with reports submitted to the city.

These measures are critical to preserving the safety, functionality, and well-being of our neighborhood while integrating this development. I urge you to address these concerns thoroughly before proceeding.

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Carly Ann Port
Santa Monica Resident
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
9 David Yakobson
From: Ashley Oelsen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 10:27 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Urgent Concerns Regarding the Proposed Development

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I am writing to urge the council to address several critical issues related to the proposed development before moving forward:

1. Architectural Approval
o The Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project have been reviewed by neighboring residents and approved by the Architectural Review Board.

2. Parking & Access
o The original Request for Proposals (RFP) required the preservation of public parking. Why has this key requirement been abandoned?
o This project jeopardizes the viability of businesses on Wilshire Boulevard and risks creating overflow parking in R4 zones. New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect residential neighborhoods.
o Traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to mitigate additional congestion in these areas.

3. Safety Requirements
o A 24/7 security presence is essential for the 14th Street project for a minimum three-year term.
o Additional street lighting is needed on the 1100 and 1200 blocks of Euclid Street and 14th Street to enhance public safety.
o Security cameras should be installed at all entry and exit points, with a 30-day retention policy for recorded footage.
o Sidewalk cleaning should occur daily, extending to surrounding areas. o A mandatory 24-hour response policy is required for graffiti removal, trash cleanup, encampment issues, and other safety concerns.

4. Community Protection
o A "Good Neighbor Agreement" should be established between the developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and the community, outlining expectations and commitments.
o There must be a zero-tolerance policy for illicit activities, with clear and transparent reporting and enforcement mechanisms.

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
10 o Annual community meetings and quarterly property inspections should be required, with reports submitted to the city for review.

These measures are essential to protect the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood while ensuring that the development aligns with community expectations.

Thank you for your consideration and commitment to these concerns.

Sincerely,
Ashley Oelsen
Santa Monica Resident
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
11 David Yakobson
From: Tera Alene <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 10:43 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 11A

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development:

1. Architectural Approval: The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board.

New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. ◦ Traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to prevent further congestion.

These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best,
Tera Alene
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
12 David Yakobson
From: Ann Maggio <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 10:25 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 11A

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
The community is raising the following issues and making request regarding this project and therefore it behooves you to address each and every one of them during when this item comes before you on Tuesday.

1. Graffiti removal

2. Encampment issues

3. Trash problems

4. Safety concerns

3. Maintenance Standards (Section remains the same)

4.Community Protection
 A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the Developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and residents of the neighboring community.  Zero tolerance policy for illicit activities. Transparent reporting and enforcement procedures for the community to use
 Annual community meetings
 Quarterly property inspection reports to the city
Sincerely,
Ann Maggio Thanawalla
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
13 "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." - Albert Einstein Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
14 David Yakobson
From: Claudine Gachi <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 9:40 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 11 A

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development at that is “extremely ugly” and looks like a prison:
 Architectural Approval: The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board.
 Parking & Access:
o The original RFP explicitly required maintaining public parking. Why was this requirement abandoned?
o This project threatens the viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses and causes overflow into R4 zones. New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. o Traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to prevent further congestion.
 Safety Requirements:
o 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term). o Additional street lighting on 1100 & 1200 Euclid St. and 14th St. o Install security cameras at all entrances/exits with 30-day retention. o Daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas. o Mandatory 24-hour response for graffiti removal, encampment issues, trash, and safety concerns.
 Community Protection:
o A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and the community.
o Zero tolerance for illicit activities, with transparent reporting and enforcement procedures. o Annual community meetings and quarterly property inspections submitted to the city.

These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
15 Claudine Gachi
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
16 David Yakobson
From: Judy Van Selow <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 9:36 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 11 A

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I urge you to address the following criƟcal issues regarding the proposed development at that is “extremely ugly” and looks like a prison:
• Architectural Approval: The DDA should not be signed unƟl the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board. • Parking & Access:
o The original RFP explicitly required maintaining public parking. Why was this requirement abandoned? o This project threatens the viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses and causes overflow into R4 zones. New parking restricƟons are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. o Trafϐic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to prevent further congesƟon. • Safety Requirements:
o 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term). o AddiƟonal street lighƟng on 1100 & 1200 Euclid St. and 14th St. o Install security cameras at all entrances/exits with 30-day retenƟon. o Daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas. o Mandatory 24-hour response for grafϐiƟ removal, encampment issues, trash, and safety concerns. • Community ProtecƟon:
o A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and the community.
o Zero tolerance for illicit acƟviƟes, with transparent reporƟng and enforcement procedures. o Annual community meeƟngs and quarterly property inspecƟons submiƩed to the city.

These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your aƩenƟon.

Sincerely,
Judy Van Selow
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
17 David Yakobson
From: David Jurus <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 6:34 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 11 A

These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your aƩenƟon.

Sincerely,
David Jurus
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
18 David Yakobson
From: Mary Stewart <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 3:24 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 11A

EXTERNAL
RE: Agenda Item 11 A
Dear City Council,
When your tenant calls you and tells you do you know what is being proposed a block from your building you listen. When that building is also a block from where your sons live you listen. I get calls weekly about people squatting in the carports, bolt cutters that are found under a pile of rags, laundry rooms broken into multiple times, calls to put in cameras, and gates. I currently have as many vacancies as I did during COVID. When asked why they are leaving , "they don't feel safe." I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development. The safety of our residence is at stake. The children who live in the neighborhood going to school each day are not safe.

1. Architectural Approval: The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board.

New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. ◦ Traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to prevent further congestion.

These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood.

Thank you for your time and please take my concerns to heart. I was born and raised in Santa Monica. I want to be proud of my city once again.

Mary Stewart
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
19 David Yakobson
From: Susan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 2:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: 1217 Euclid St 11A

EXTERNAL
I urge the City Council to delay approving the DDA with HCHC to strengthen this project and advance Santa Monica’s affordable housing goals. The $13.5 million funding gap—on top of providing the land as surplus—places a significant strain on the City’s resources. HCHC should work to reduce this burden, as it will be unsustainable to meet the Housing Element goals if each 100% affordable project requires tens of millions in funding gaps.

Additionally, while the RFP called for approaches to replacing public parking, the current proposal does not include a clear plan to address this. Eliminating public parking without viable alternatives could harm businesses and visitors along Wilshire Boulevard. Taking the time to address these financial and community concerns will make the project more sustainable and effective.

Susan
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
20 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 10:24 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 11 A

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
How about doing the right think!
I urge you to address the following criƟcal issues regarding the proposed development:

1. Architectural Approval: The DDA should not be signed unƟl the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board.

New parking restricƟons are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. ◦ Traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to prevent further congesƟon.

3. Safety Requirements:
◦ 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project (3-year term). ◦ AddiƟonal street lighƟng on 1100 & 1200 Euclid St. and 14th St. ◦ Install security cameras at all entrances/exits with 30-day retenƟon. ◦ Daily sidewalk cleaning, including surrounding areas. ◦ Mandatory 24-hour response for graffiƟ removal, encampment issues, trash, and safety concerns.

4. Community ProtecƟon:
◦ A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and the community.
◦ Zero tolerance for illicit acƟviƟes, with transparent reporƟng and enforcement procedures. ◦ Annual community meeƟngs and quarterly property inspecƟons submiƩed to the city.

These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your aƩenƟon.

Sincerely,
Fred Alexander
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
21 David Yakobson
From: Kelli <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 9:50 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 11 A

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development:

1. Architectural Approval: The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board.

New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. ◦ Traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to prevent further congestion.

These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,
Kelli Urode
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
22 David Yakobson
From: Faustino Garza <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 8:40 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Fw: Agenda Item 11 A

EXTERNAL

Santa Monica City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development:

1. Architectural Approval: The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street
Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board.

2. Parking & Access:
◦ The original RFP explicitly required maintaining public parking. Why was this requirement abandoned?
◦ This project threatens the viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses and causes overflow into R4 zones.

New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. ◦ Traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to prevent further congestion.

4. Community Protection:
◦ A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the developer (HCHC), The People
Concern (TPC), and the community.
◦ Zero tolerance for illicit activities, with transparent reporting and enforcement procedures. ◦ Annual community meetings and quarterly property inspections submitted to the city.

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
23 These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood.

Faustino Garza
37-year homeowner and resident
Sunset Park
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
24 David Yakobson
From: Faustino Garza <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2024 8:37 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 11 A

EXTERNAL
Santa Monica City Council,
I urge you to address the following critical issues regarding the proposed development:

1. Architectural Approval: The DDA should not be signed until the architectural plans for the 14th Street
Housing Project are reviewed by neighbors and approved by the Architectural Review Board.

2. Parking & Access:
◦ The original RFP explicitly required maintaining public parking. Why was this requirement abandoned?
◦ This project threatens the viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses and causes overflow into R4 zones.

New parking restrictions are urgently needed to protect our neighborhoods. ◦ Traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys must be addressed to prevent further congestion.

4. Community Protection:
◦ A comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" is needed between the developer (HCHC), The People
Concern (TPC), and the community.
◦ Zero tolerance for illicit activities, with transparent reporting and enforcement procedures. ◦ Annual community meetings and quarterly property inspections submitted to the city.

These steps are vital to ensuring the safety, sustainability, and integrity of our neighborhood.

Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
25 Faustino Garza
37-year homeowner and resident
Sunset Park
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
26 David Yakobson
From: Giacomo Valentini <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2024 4:30 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: City Council Meeting Tuesday, Dec17 - Agenda Item 11A

EXTERNAL
Concerns: Agenda Item 11A
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the upcoming 1217 Euclid Street Housing Project and the 1211-1217 14th Street Housing Project. Despite previous community input, several critical issues remain unresolved.

Firstly, the removal of the public parking requirement from the original RFP threatens the viability of Wilshire Blvd businesses and necessitates new parking restrictions to protect R4 zones from overflow. Additionally, the traffic flow through Euclid Court and 14th Court alleys requires immediate attention.

Secondly, the safety of the project and surrounding areas needs to be ensured through 24/7 security guards for the 14th Street project, additional street lighting, security cameras with 30-day retention, and daily sidewalk cleaning. A mandatory 24-hour response protocol should be in place for graffiti removal, encampment issues, trash problems, and safety concerns.

Thirdly, a comprehensive "Good Neighbor Agreement" between the Developer (HCHC), The People Concern (TPC), and residents is crucial. This agreement should include a zero-tolerance policy for illicit activities with transparent reporting and enforcement procedures, as well as annual community meetings and quarterly property inspection reports to the city.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Giacomo Valentini
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
27 David Yakobson
From: Joyce Urode <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2024 8:12 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: euclid project

EXTERNAL
dear council members! please reconsider this disastrous project! it will destroy our neighborhoods and the businesses on wilshire blvd. where are the business going to have customers park?? there are numerous buildings all over santa monica that are empty so use them for housing! please reconsider this project. you are destroying our neighborhoods! thank u joyce urode Sent from my iPhone Item 11-A
December 17, 2024
Item 11-A
December 17, 2024

Santa Monica City CouncilDecember 17, 2024

Santa Monica City Council
December 17, 2024