City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: March 25, 2025
Agenda Item: 7.A
1 of 22
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rick Valte, Public Works Director, Public Works, Water Resources Subject: Five-Year Water and Wastewater Rate Study Session Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15273 of the CEQA Guidelines for the five-year water and wastewater rate study session; and
2. Provide direction and recommendations to staff regarding potential rate adjustments and rate structures for the ongoing five-year water and wastewater rate study.
Summary
The City of Santa Monica continues to be a recognized leader in the world for its innovative water infrastructure projects and environmental policies aimed to provide a resilient, reliable and sustainable water supply. The City’s Public Works Department – Water Resources Division provides drinking water, wastewater collection, and recycled water services to residents, commercial, and institutional customers throughout the City.
These services are funded through self-sustaining Water and Wastewater Enterprise Funds that are separate from the City’s General Fund. The Water and Wastewater Enterprise Funds are evaluated every five years to ensure that sufficient funding is available to: 1) supply high-quality drinking water for potable use, 2) maintain routine operation and maintenance of the water distribution and wastewater collection infrastructure, 3) implement capital improvement program (CIP) projects for system resiliency and reliability, 4) advance sustainable water management efforts (e.g., water conservation and sustainable groundwater management) and 5) comply with Proposition 218 requirements to ensure cost of services are properly allocated amongst 2 of 22
user classifications and rate tiers. The City Council has consistently taken a strategic approach to setting future water and wastewater rates that balance a concern for keeping costs affordable to the community while adequately investing in long-term water quality, reliability, resiliency, and sustainability.
Staff in the Water Resources Division have retained a rate study consultant, NBS, to conduct the rate studies and recommend rate adjustments (Attachment C). Rate adjustments are needed to invest in system reliability and resiliency as well as keeping pace with escalating costs in serving over 93,000 residents and 2,700 businesses and institutions that make up the City’s 18,000+ accounts for water and wastewater services.
Staff are seeking City Council input and direction on the two rate options presented below. Based on comments received from City Council and outreach efforts with the community, staff will present the final water and wastewater rate study for City Council adoption in June 2025.
Background
The Water and Wastewater Rate Study will establish the basis to set the water and wastewater rates for fiscal years (FY) 2025-26 through 2029-30 in compliance with Proposition 218 requirements. Proposition 218 stipulates, among other things, that charges for water and wastewater services must not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to each parcel or customer. Staff are currently working with the consultant, NBS, to establish the cost of service that is in compliance with Prop 218 requirements. The rate study will include a review of the following to set the water and wastewater rate structure:
• Operating and capital revenue requirements for the City’s Water and Wastewater enterprise funds over a five-year period, FY 2025-26 through 2029-30; • Fund reserves, maintain AAA bond rating/capacity, and cover current and future debt obligations;
3 of 22
• Water and sewer rates / structure – adjusting the fixed-service charge component, tiered rates, number of tiers, usage allocations by tier, and customer class designations (e.g., residential, commercial);
• Affordability of rates including low-income discounts / rates for purposes of determining the level of subsidy from non-rate payer funds (e.g., City’s general fund);
• Cost of service for each rate/fee/charge by customer class, meter size and tier; • Impact of proposed changes versus existing rates;
• Funding for capital improvement program projects (e.g., system resiliency projects including rehabilitating the City’s four potable water storage reservoirs); and
• Other related factors as identified by the public, City Council, advisory groups and staff as part of the rate study outreach process.
The consultant’s financial analysis has considered the cost of service to operate the system, produce and distribute high-quality drinking water, replace and upgrade existing facilities, implement routine capital improvement projects, and fund one-time CIP projects that will maintain infrastructure reliability and resiliency. The financial analysis for the water and wastewater enterprise funds are broken down into three key components:
1. Expenditures, broken down into three categories:
a. Operating & Maintenance (O&M) - Salaries and benefits of Water Resources staff (current and future to support expanded operations from water self-sufficiency projects added during the 2020-2024 rate study) as well as all the supplies, contracted services, and water sustainability programs to produce local water and maintain a reliable and resilient water supply for customers. The O&M expenditure also includes debt service (e.g., $78 million water revenue bond in the water fund and $55 million State Revolving Fund loan in the wastewater fund). O&M expenditures typically account for approximately 70-75% of the total water fund expenditures.
4 of 22
b. Routine Capital Projects - Replace aging water mains on a 100-year cycle, upgrade software infrastructure and facilities to function efficiently, reliably, and meet industry standards. Routine capital projects typically account for approximately 20-25% of the total water fund expenditures. c. One-time Capital Projects - Non-routine capital improvement projects to replace or maintain aging assets, including rehabilitating the City’s four potable water storage reservoirs that total 40 million gallons in storage, replacing aging operation facilities (e.g., water quality laboratory) and redrilling and refurbishing aging groundwater production wells.
2. Revenues - the primary source of revenue generated by the established water and wastewater rates.
3. Reserves - to ensure continuity of water and wastewater service due to unforeseen events. The water and wastewater enterprise fund’s current reserve policy include:
a. Capital Rehabilitation and Replacement Reserve = 3% of capital assets. b. Operating Reserve = maintain minimum of 60 days of operating budget and target a 90-day operating reserve.
c. Rate Stabilization Reserve = intended for unexpected decrease in revenues or increase in expenditures (e.g., higher than forecasted increase for charges from regional wastewater collection/treatment provider). A rate stabilization reserve of $1 million has been set by City Council previously.
Discussion
Water Enterprise Fund
The City’s Water Fund supports production, treatment, and distribution of high-quality drinking water to meet the City’s water demands. Over the past five years since the last five-year water rates were adopted in January 2020, revenues have been lower than originally projected in each year as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic (e.g., decline in water use in commercial and multi-family residential customers) and climate change impacts on water usage (severe drought conditions followed by extreme wet winter periods). Between Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-20 and FY 2023-24, the Water Fund had 5 of 22
experienced a total revenue shortfall of approximately $18.5 million as indicated in Figure 1 below. In addition, revenues for FY 2024-25 are forecasted to have a shortfall of nearly $5 million and will need to dip into the Water Fund reserves to mitigate the shortfall. Expenditures for both operation and construction during and post pandemic have also exceeded original projections due to higher than anticipated market inflation rates (e.g., 3-4% prior to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and 4-9% general inflation after; ~4% in the water sector prior to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and 6-16% after) caused by supply chain shortages and increases in material costs.
Figure 1: Summary of Water Fund Revenue Forecast versus Actuals from FY 2019-20 through FY 2023-24
Despite the revenue shortfalls and high market escalation rates experienced over the past five years, the Water Resources Division was still able to successfully deliver the local water supply and water efficiency projects outlined in the 2018 Sustainable Water Master Plan (Attachment D). These projects included the Olympic Well Field 6 of 22
Restoration, Arcadia Water Treatment Plant Production Efficiency Enhancement and Expansion Project, Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project, and Groundwater Resiliency Projects (two new groundwater production wells and two new groundwater recharge wells). Staff was able to bridge the funding gap for these water self-sufficiency projects by securing a $10 million grant from the California Department of Water Resources and a $78 million water revenue bond as well as deferring selected routine CIP projects (e.g., annual water main replacement).
For the current five-year rate cycle (2025-30), expenditures (O&M, routine capital, and one-time capital projects) are forecasted to outpace revenues by nearly $6-7 million in FY 2025-26 alone and the gap will continue to grow without a rate adjustment to replenish reserves and keep pace with market escalation rates. In addition, several critical projects are planned for this five-year rate cycle to address resiliency and aging infrastructure, including:
• Rehabilitation of the City’s four potable water storage reservoirs (total capacity of 40 million gallons or roughly 4 days of the City’s total water supply) that range from 60 to over 100 years old. These four storage reservoirs are critical in providing water to meet peak daily/seasonal and emergency fire demands. • Replacing the City’s drinking water operations center and water quality laboratory that are both over 60 years old. The two aging facilities are the brain of the City’s water system which monitor and control the entire drinking water treatment and distribution network throughout the City.
• Capital projects to further enhance water supply resiliency and emergency response.
A list of planned CIP projects and projects pending outside funding/financing is provided in Attachment E. The CIP projects pending outside funding/financing are large capital projects that are outside of typical replacement and upgrade frequencies where funding it solely through water rate revenues would place an extensive burden on the rate payers and require a significant increase in revenues to support it. Outside funding and financing typically require a local funding match and are provided through a 7 of 22
reimbursement model. A portion of the total program cost is included in the planned CIP Project budget for use as either matching funds and/or to maintain cash flow for reimbursement of funds from outside funding agencies. The rate consultant has developed two rate options to fund the capital projects necessary to maintain reliability, resiliency, and emergency preparedness of the City’s water system. A brief summary of the two rate options is provided in Table 1 and briefly discussed below. The two rate options will be presented to City Council during the Study Session.
Table 1: Summary of Water Rate Options
Water Rate
Option
Fund
Routine
Operations
Capacity
Fee %
Rehabilitate
Reservoirs
and Replace
Water Ops
Center
Capital Improvement
Program
All CIP
Projects
Funded
With
Efficiencies
(75%
Funded)
1 ✓ 20% ✓ ✓
2 ✓ 15% ✓
Water Rate Option 1, recommended by the consultant, aims to balance rate adjustments with outside funding/financing support to minimize financial impacts on the rate payers. Under this option, staff will work on securing grants and low interest loans to pay for at least 49% of the total program that includes rehabilitating the City’s four potable water storage reservoirs and replace the water operations center and water quality laboratory. The recommended rate adjustment for this option is 20% (year 1), 16% (year 2), 9% (year 3), 9% (year 4), and 6% (year 5). • The higher % rate adjustment in year 1 and 2 is partially due to replenishing the water fund reserves from the revenue shortfall of nearly $5 million expected for FY 2024-25.
• This option would rehabilitate all four potable water storage reservoirs over an 8- 10 year period as only one reservoir can be taken offline at once for rehabilitation and repairs. The estimated capital cost to rehabilitate the four reservoirs is approximately $80 million in 2025 dollars.
• Staff has already begun discussing and identifying financial assistance opportunities with state and federal agencies (e.g., Hazard Mitigation Grant 8 of 22
Program, low interest loans from the Environmental Protection Agency’s Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act, and United States Bureau of Reclamation’s WaterSMART or Reclamation Grants).
• Should staff be unsuccessful in securing outside financing, there would still be sufficient funding to rehabilitate one out of the four potable water reservoirs and replace the aging water operations center and water quality laboratory during this rate study cycle. The three other potable water storage reservoirs would be replaced during each of the subsequent five-year rate cycles and all four would be rehabilitated within the next 20 years. Delaying replacement of the reservoirs increases the risk of failure, reduces water supply resiliency to respond to emergency events, and may interrupt water deliveries to the community. • Staff would also consider increasing the fixed charge (e.g., capacity fee) component from 15% to 20% of the revenue requirements in an effort to improve cost recovery of the fixed operating cost that accounts for over 70% of the total water fund expenditures.
The projected water fund forecast and reserves for the recommended Water Rate Option 1 is summarized in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. As noted in Figure 2 by the black line, without a rate adjustment, the water fund could only fund less than 50% of the routine capital projects to maintain system reliability in FY 2025-26 and would be unable to fund any capital projects after FY 2027-28. With the recommended rate adjustments under Water Rate Option 1, sufficient revenue is forecasted to maintain water system reliability and enhance resiliency by rehabilitating and replacing aging infrastructure. The expenditure forecast in Figure 2 also includes additional debt service that will be taken on by the water fund starting in FY 2028-29 as staff seeks to secure outside financing to support key reliability and resiliency projects for the City’s water infrastructure. The recommended Water Rate Option 1 also maintains minimum reserve levels through the five-year rate study period, first by replenishing the reserves to meet the minimum reserve target by the end of FY 2025-26 and achieve the recommended reserve target by the end of the rate study period in FY 2029-30. 9 of 22
Figure 2: Summary of Revenue and Expenditures Forecast for the Recommended Water Rate Option 1
10 of 22
Figure 3: Summary of Water Fund Reserve Balance for the Recommended Water Rate Option 1
Water Rate Option 2 aims to minimize rate adjustments by deferring the reservoir rehabilitation, new water operations center, and new water quality laboratory to future rate study cycles (e.g., FY 2030-31 through FY 2034-35). In addition, only 75% of the routine CIP projects listed in Attachment E would be funded. Under Water Rate Option 2, the following capital projects from Attachment E would be placed on hold or deferred to a future five-year rate study cycle:
• Defer CIP Project: Reservoir Improvements – Riviera ($8.6 million) • Defer CIP Project Arcadia WTP Operations Center and Water Quality Lab Replacement ($18.8 million)
• Defer all Water fund CIP Projects Pending Outside Funding/Financing ($96.6 million)
11 of 22
• Reduce CIP Project funding by 25%, approximately $5 to $5.5 million each fiscal year, through deferring annual water main replacement and/or groundwater production well replacement.
The proposed rate adjustment for Option 2 is 11% (year 1), 9% (year 2), 7% (year 3), 6% (year 4), and 6% (year 5). The projected water fund forecast and reserves for the recommended Water Rate Option 1 is summarized in Figure 4 and Figure 5. Water Rate Option 2 is not recommended by staff as the City’s potable water reservoirs, water operations center, and water quality laboratory are all over 60-70 years old. Further delay of rehabilitation and/or replacement of these critical infrastructure that serve the entire community may result in insufficient water supplies to respond to regional emergencies (e.g., wildfires), interrupt delivery of potable water to customers for extended periods (e.g., months to a year) until repairs could be made, necessitate the purchase of more costly imported water, prevent the City from meeting max day water demands and peak summer water demands, and risk non-compliance with regulatory requirements.
12 of 22
Figure 4: Summary of Revenue and Expenditures Forecast for the Water Rate Option 2 13 of 22
Figure 5: Summary of Water Fund Reserve Balance for the Water Rate Option 2 Low Income Provision
The current and proposed rate structure includes a low-income provision where the first tier water rate for qualified single-family, low-income customers is discounted. Under a tiered water rate system, each tier is allocated a certain total volume of water at a set rate for the tier and increases when usage exceeds the tier allocation (e.g. exceeds first tier) and moves to the next tier (second tier). Tiered water rates reward customers who use water efficiently and discourage water waste. On February 24, 2015, Council approved a discount rate of $1 per hundred cubic feet (HCF) for the first tier when it switched to a 100% volumetric-based rate structure.
For single-family, low-income customers, the maximum bimonthly discount through the low-income provision is currently around $14. Second, third, and fourth tier rates are not 14 of 22
discounted since these apply to more discretionary uses of water and are meant to discourage water waste. Low-income customers qualify for the water discount by providing evidence of enrollment in the low-income program offered by Southern 21 of 36 California Edison or the Southern California Gas Company.
Cost of service requirements under Proposition 218 require that the discount provided to qualified low-income customers be covered by the City’s General Fund to prevent it from being subsidized by other ratepayers. The average annual General Fund transfer to the Water Fund is currently around $115,000, which benefits approximately 360+ customer accounts. Staff recommends funding low-income customers at the same levels. Pending Council’s feedback on rate structure alternatives, staff and the consultant would recommend maintaining the low-income subsidy structure but adjusting it to be in line with the rate structure ultimately selected.
Wastewater Enterprise Fund
The City provides wastewater service through operation and maintenance of an extensive wastewater collection system as well as advanced treated recycled water through the Sustainable Water Infrastructure Project (SWIP). The City is one of 28 agencies that contracts with the City of Los Angeles for wastewater treatment services provided at the City of Los Angeles’ Hyperion Treatment plant. Under the terms of the agreement with the City of Los Angeles, the City pays a proportionate share of the operations and maintenance expenses as well as capital charges for the Hyperion treatment and collection system. Payment to the City of Los Angeles for treatment typically accounts for 30% to 50% of the Wastewater Fund’s annual budget. Similar to the Water Enterprise Fund, the Wastewater Enterprise Fund also experienced a total revenue shortfall of approximately $12 million as indicated in Figure 6. Revenue targets were met in FY 2022-23 due to the $4 million in principal forgiveness from the low interest State Revolving Fund loan provided by the State of California to finance the construction cost for SWIP. In addition, revenues for FY 2024-25 are forecasted to have a shortfall of nearly $3.4 million. Expenditures for both operation and construction during and post pandemic have also exceeded original projections due to higher than 15 of 22
anticipated market inflation rates caused by supply chain shortages and increases in raw material costs.
Figure 6: Summary of Wastewater Fund Revenue Forecast versus Actuals from FY 2019-20 through FY 2023-24
Similar to the water fund, the Water Resources Division was still able to deliver on local water supply projects despite the revenue shortfalls and high market escalation rates experienced over the past five years. In particular, the wastewater fund, with support from the City’s stormwater fund, was able to deliver the award winning SWIP that captures stormwater, urban runoff, and municipal wastewater to produce purified water for non-potable (e.g., irrigation) and potable reuse (groundwater recharge). Staff was able to bridge the funding gap by securing a $8.77 million grant from the State Water Resources Control Board Proposition 1 Stormwater grant, $7.5 million grant from the Los Angeles County Measure W Safe Clean Water Program, and a $55 million low 16 of 22
interest loan from the State Water Resources Control Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund.
For the current five-year rate cycle (FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30), the recommended rate adjustment for the wastewater fund is fairly straight forward in comparison to the water fund. The recommended rate adjustment for the wastewater fund aims to keep pace with market escalation rates over the five-year period at 7%, 7%, 7%, 6%, and 6%. The wastewater fund is not expected to fund any major one-time capital projects during the current rate study period and will fund primarily routine capital projects to maintain existing wastewater infrastructure. There are two one-time projects that are listed under the wastewater fund, Moss Avenue Pump Station Improvements and Santa Monica Uran Runoff Recycling Facility (SMURRF) Upgrades but are reimbursed by the City of Los Angeles. The Moss Avenue Pump Station Improvements is a part of City of Los Angeles’ Amalgamated System for wastewater collection and cost associated with the project is 100% reimbursed by the City of Los Angeles.
Upgrades at the SMURRF is a 50/50 cost share with the City of Los Angeles as the facility reduces pollution from dry weather urban runoff from the watershed and in the ocean. A list of planned CIP projects for the wastewater fund is provided in Attachment E.
The projected wastewater fund forecast and reserves for the recommended wastewater rate adjustment are summarized in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively. The wastewater fund has a healthy starting fund balance for the FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30 rate study as a result of deferring annual wastewater main replacement programs to help mitigate against declining revenues. The reserves will be used instead of cash during FY 2026-27, FY 2027-28, and FY 2028-29 to fund routine capital projects as indicated in Figure 7 below where a green bar is not present for the three fiscal years. Over the five-year period, the wastewater fund reserves will be drawn down until it reaches the target reserve levels at the end of the rate study period as indicated in Figure 8. 17 of 22
Figure 7: Summary of Wastewater Fund Revenue and Expenditures Forecast for the Recommended Rate Adjustment
18 of 22
Figure 8: Summary of Wastewater Fund Reserve Balance for the Recommended Rate Adjustment
Low Income Provision
The current and proposed rate structure includes a low-income provision where the wastewater rate for qualified single-family, low-income customers is discounted. On February 24, 2015, Council approved a discount rate of $1 per hundred cubic feet (HCF) for the first wastewater tier. Low-income customers qualify for the water discount by providing evidence of enrollment in the low-income program offered by Southern California Edison or the Southern California Gas Company.
Cost of service requirements under Proposition 218 require that the discount provided to qualified low-income customers be covered by the City’s General Fund in order to avoid it being subsidized by other ratepayers. The average annual General Fund 19 of 22
transfer to the Wastewater Fund has historically been around $40,000 per year, which benefits approximately 360+ customer accounts. Staff recommends funding low-income customers at the same levels. Pending Council’s feedback on rate structure alternatives, staff and the consultant would recommend maintaining the low-income subsidy structure but adjusting it to be in line with the rate structure ultimately selected.
Recycled Water and Drought Rate
Staff recommends maintaining the same drought rate structure framework as adopted in the 2020-2024 Five Year Water Rate Study. The drought rate structure would only be implemented and take effect as directed by City Council when water conservation is mandated in the region or across the state. The level of conservation mandated (e.g., 10% or 20% mandated reduction in water use) would determine the adjusted tiered water commodity rate structure.
At the time this staff report was prepared, the recycled water rates were still under development. However, staff will present information to Council as part of the study session for this staff report.
Community Outreach
To support the rate study development, increase community awareness, provide transparent information to the community, and solicit community feedback, Water Resources staff will also be conducting outreach activities aimed to:
• Develop community understanding of the importance of the goals the City is trying to achieve with the rate study (e.g., maintaining high quality service provided to the community and implementing capital improvement projects to achieve water self-sufficiency).
• Provide transparent information about the current state of rates and findings of the rate study.
• Clearly communicate and develop an understanding of the reasonable need to make financial investments focused on maintaining reliability and resiliency. 20 of 22
• Provide all community leaders and stakeholders easy-to-understand information in a variety of platforms and easy access to updated information. • Provide the community with a transparent Proposition 218 process that informs ratepayers about the cost of service for identified operational and capital needs Planned public outreach efforts include attending neighborhood and civic/business group meetings, holding general outreach forums, developing fact sheets, and distributing notifications and soliciting public comments through the Proposition 218 process.
Environmental Review
The City’s water and wastewater rate study is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15273 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates, tolls, fares, and other charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of meeting operating expenses, purchasing for leasing supplies, equipment, or materials, meeting financial reserve needs and requirements, and obtaining funds for capital projects, necessary to maintain service within existing service areas.” The intent of the rate study is to adjust water and wastewater rates to maintain system reliability and resiliency while ensuring the rates are proportional to the cost of service provided to each parcel or customer. Therefore, adjustment of rates is exempt from CEQA.
Next Steps and Schedule
Staff seeks comments from Council regarding rate adjustment scenarios, outside financing strategy, and cost recovery structure alternatives. Following this meeting, staff will work with the rate consultant to complete the rate study and public notifications will be sent out in accordance with Proposition 218 requirements. After the 45-day public notice period, a noticed public hearing will be scheduled in accordance with Proposition 218 for Council to consider the completed rate study and proposed rate structures for 21 of 22
water and wastewater rates in FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30. Staff anticipates the public hearing to be held in June 2025.
Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
January 28, 2020
(Attachment A)
Public Hearing and Adoption a Resolution Establishing
Scheduled Wastewater Service Rate Adjustments
January 28, 2020
(Attachment B)
Public Hearing and Adoption a Resolution Establishing
Scheduled Water Service Rate Adjustments
May 14, 2024
(Attachment C)
Award Professional Services Contract to NBS Government
Finance Group, dba NBS to Analyze the Existing
Water/Wastewater Rate Structure and Establish a New FiveYear Rate Structure for Potable Water, Recycled Water, and Wastewater Commodity Charges; Fire Line Rates; and
Capital Facility Fee for Calendar Years 2025 to 2029
Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
There is no immediate financial impact or budget action necessary as this is a study session for Council to provide input. Staff will return to Council at a later date to seek specific budget actions.
The estimated financial impacts to rate payers for FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30 of the five-year rate study are estimated as a five-year average of potential increases per year. This would mean that the combined bimonthly water and wastewater bills are estimated to increase each year for five years (essentially five times). The estimated range of increase for each major customer class per year for the two water rate options and proposed wastewater rate adjustment is listed below. • Single Family Homes - an estimated $25-37 increase for an average singlefamily home bimonthly bill, or roughly $13-19 per month, each year over five years.
• Multi-Family Units - an estimated $48-80 increase for an average 8-unit multifamily residential building, which represents an approximate monthly increase of $6-10 per unit, each year over five years.
• Commercial - an estimated $99-146 increase for an average commercial building’s bimonthly bill each year over five years.
22 of 22
The higher range of potential impacts to each major customer class reflects Water Rate Option 1 while the lower range reflects Water Rate Option 2. As an example, the difference between the two water rate options for a single-family home is approximately $12 per bi-monthly bill or $6 per month.
Prepared By: Sunny Wang, Water Resources Manager
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. January 28, 2020 Public Hearing & Adoption Wastewater Rates (Web Link) B. January 28, 2020 Public Hearing & Adoption Water Rates (Web Link) C. May 14, 2024 Staff Report (Web Link)
D. 2018 Sustainable Water Master Plan
E. Water and Wastewater Fund Planned CIP List
F. Written Comments
G. PowerPoint Presentation