Santa Monica City Council
September 9, 2025

Introduction
The history of cannabis prohibition in California—and across the United States—extends beyond the past; it continues to shape the economic, social, and legal realities of many communities today. For decades, communities of color, particularly Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), have faced the harshest consequences of cannabis enforcement, experiencing not only legal penalties but also long-term economic and social repercussions. These include barriers to employment, education, financial stability, and overall community well-being. The disproportionate impact of cannabis-related arrests and convictions, coupled with systemic inequalities such as generational poverty and education gaps, has created formidable barriers to economic participation, particularly within the regulated cannabis industry.

Recognizing these ongoing inequities, California enacted the California Cannabis Equity Act1 in 2018 as a legislative initiative to mitigate the lasting harm caused by cannabis prohibition. The Act aims to promote equitable ownership and employment opportunities within the cannabis industry by establishing a state-supported program to assist local jurisdictions in developing and implementing cannabis equity programs. Through this initiative, the state provides loans, grants, and technical assistance to support entrepreneurs from disproportionately impacted communities in entering and sustaining businesses in the regulated market.

To effectively administer the Cannabis Equity Grants Program, the Department of Cannabis Control (DCC)—formerly the Bureau of Cannabis Control—entered into an interagency agreement with the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz). This collaborative effort is designed to support local jurisdictions in their efforts to provide financial and technical assistance to equity applicants and licensees, ensuring that those most affected by prohibition have access to meaningful opportunities in the legal cannabis industry.

While the legalization of cannabis in California represented a critical step toward addressing historical injustices, the experience of affected communities has demonstrated that legalization alone is insufficient. Cannabis equity programs are a necessary response to these systemic challenges, aiming to achieve three primary objectives:
 Economic Justice – Providing financial resources, technical support, and business development assistance to individuals from disproportionately impacted communities to enable them to enter and thrive in the legal cannabis industry.  Barrier Reduction – Addressing systemic challenges such as limited access to capital, complex regulatory requirements, and the social stigma associated with past cannabisrelated convictions to create a more inclusive and accessible industry. 1 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB1294

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1200 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

 Community Reinvestment – Ensuring that economic benefits flow back into the communities that were most affected by cannabis criminalization, fostering long-term recovery, economic empowerment, and social equity.

Purpose of Cannabis Equity Assessment
The Cannabis Equity Assessment (“Equity Assessment”) serves as a comprehensive analysis of the impact of cannabis criminalization in Santa Monica (“City”) and the systemic barriers that have prevented affected communities and individuals from accessing opportunities within the legal cannabis industry. This assessment employs a data-driven approach to identify communities disproportionately impacted by past cannabis enforcement, examining key indicators such as arrest records, poverty rates, educational attainment, and other socioeconomic factors that reflect the long-term consequences of prohibition policies. Additionally, the assessment evaluates the structure of the existing cannabis industry to identify the specific obstacles that hinder equitable participation within the City.

The primary objective of this Equity Assessment is to provide a foundation for the development and implementation of a cannabis equity program in Santa Monica. Such a program would establish targeted policies, initiatives, and support mechanisms to assist historically impacted communities in entering and succeeding in the legal cannabis market. To be effective, the City's cannabis equity program must be transparent, accessible, and equitable, addressing the unique challenges and needs faced by affected individuals. By leveraging this assessment, the City can create a cannabis equity framework that fosters economic inclusion, social justice, and long-term community reinvestment.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1201 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

1. Cannabis Equity Analysis
Methodology
This Equity Assessment examines historical cannabis-related arrest data in the City to evaluate the disproportionate impact of cannabis enforcement and the War on Drugs in communities within Santa Monica. The analysis utilizes cannabis-related arrest statistics provided by the Santa Monica Police Department (SMPD) and overlays this data with census tract information to identify spatial and demographic disparities. By mapping arrest “hot spots” within the City, this study seeks to determine whether a correlation exists between high-arrest areas and concentrations of demographic factors, thereby identifying communities disproportionately affected by cannabis criminalization.

The cannabis-related arrest data, covering the period from 1993 to 2023, was obtained directly from the SMPD. To contextualize this information, demographic data was sourced from the 2018– 2022 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. The selection of this dataset ensures alignment with demographic indicators from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool, which also relies on the ACS 2018–2022 5- Year Summary.

Cannabis Enforcement History
Prior to the 1900’s, cannabis was cultivated throughout the United States primarily for its industrial use (as “hemp” for use in a variety of commercial items including paper, rope, textiles, etc.) and its medicinal uses with very little targeted government regulation. Cannabis use for its psychoactive effects began to increase during the 1900’s. Simultaneously, a widespread national “anti-intoxicant” sentiment that resulted in prohibition of alcohol was also emerging.

As a result, beginning in the early 1900s, most States began placing restrictions on the cultivation and sale of cannabis. The first national regulation of cannabis was created by the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 (as marijuana was spelled at the time), which placed a tax on the sale of cannabis and allowed for law enforcement to make arrests for non-payment of the tax. The Narcotic Control Act of 1961 and the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 officially made the manufacture, importation, possession, use, and distribution of cannabis illegal throughout the United States.

The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) was created in 1973 and began increasing its enforcement activities, while recreational cannabis use was also increasing – first as popularized by the counter-culture revolution of the time and then as it moved into the more mainstream population. The term “War on Drugs” emerged following several press conferences held by thenPresident Richard Nixon during the Summer of 1971.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1202 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

The Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 increased federal penalties for cultivation, possession, or transfer of marijuana; and the 1990 Crime Control Act provided funding for local law enforcement agencies to seize private property associated with unlawful drug activities, including cannabis cultivation or distribution.

Illegal cannabis use was increasing, and so was the response from law enforcement. In their 2012 definitive analysis on the subject, researchers Holly Nguyen and Peter Reuter point out that:
“There has been a dramatic rise in the number of arrests for simple possession since 1991.

In 2008, about 800,000 individuals were arrested for possession of small amounts of marijuana (typically less than an ounce). That figure was more than three times the number in 1991.”2
Most importantly, Nguyen and Reuter showed that although the cannabis use rate was about the same for White and Black Americans, rates of arrest are about three times higher for Black Americans:
“Although Whites and Blacks show an overall increase in arrest rates since 1991, the rates for the two races are markedly different. In 1991, Blacks were arrested twice as often as Whites. In 2008, Blacks were more than three times likely to be arrested as Whites. This starkly contrasts with their almost identical rates of use.” Meanwhile, although the War on Drugs continued to rage and affect Black/African American, LatinX, and indigenous communities disproportionately, attitudes of Californians began to change significantly in the early 1990s. The medicinal value of cannabis to HIV patients for appetite stimulation and pain management was well supported by Californians who began a 20-year acceptance of medicinal, and ultimately recreational, cannabis along with the associated decriminalization.

In 1996, Californians passed Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act, which allowed for the use of medicinal cannabis. In 2011, there were notable changes in California law, and some misdemeanor marijuana statutes were re-classified as infractions, leading to a significant decline in misdemeanor marijuana arrests. The Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act was adopted by the California Legislature in 2015, and in November 2016, California voters passed Proposition 64, which legalized the possession and use of marijuana for individuals 21 years of age and older and reduced the offense degree for a number of marijuana-related offenses. Proposition 64 essentially ended cannabis prohibition in California. For example, in 2014, there were 13,300 felony arrests for cannabis in California, where that number had dropped to 1,181 by 2019. 2 Nguyen, H., & Reuter, P. (2012). How Risky Is Marijuana Possession? Considering the Role of Age, Race, and Gender. Crime & Delinquency, 58(6), 879-910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712461122

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1203 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

However, much of the damage from disproportionate enforcement of cannabis-related laws had already been done, and the long-term effects of the War on Drugs, have persisted and are well documented. For example, in their 2017 research for the Cato Institute (“Four Decades and Counting: The Continued Failure of the War on Drugs”) Christopher J. Coyne and Abigail R. Hall point out that:
“A felony drug charge can also cause an individual to lose eligibility to work for the federal government; enlist in the U.S. Armed Forces; obtain an import, customs, or other license; or obtain a passport. Many private-sector job applications require criminal background checks and the disclosure of felony convictions, preventing individuals convicted of drug offenses from obtaining gainful employment. Given the rate at which minorities are arrested for crime, this has immense implications for the long-term prosperity of both individuals and broader communities.”3
Further, in its 2020 “Crime in California” report, the California Department of Justice indicated that although the overall number of arrests for cannabis related activities is trending downward since legalization, arrests are still disproportionately high for non-white citizens – Hispanic citizens accounted for nearly 42% of those arrests, followed by Black citizens, at 22%, with White citizens at 21%.

City of Santa Monica Demographics
Figure 1 below presents the 2018–2022 5-Year demographic estimates for Santa Monica. Among residents who reported a single racial identity, the largest demographic group is White (69.0%), followed by Hispanic or Latino (17.2%), Asian (8.8%), Black or African American (5.3%), American Indian and Alaska Native (0.7%), and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (0.1%).

Figure 1 – Distribution of Race/Ethnicity, City of Santa Monica (2022) 3 Coyne, Christopher J. and Hall, Abigail R, Four Decades and Counting: The Continued Failure of the War on Drugs (April 12, 2017). Cato Institute Policy Analysis No. 811, Available at SSRN:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2979445
Race/Ethnicity Population Percent
White alone 63,638 69.0%
Hispanic or Latino 15,831 17.2%
Asian alone 8,156 8.8%
Black or African American alone 4,854 5.3%
American Indian and Alaska Native alone 608 0.7%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone 79 0.1% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1204 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Cannabis-Related Arrests
As part of this analysis, historical cannabis-related arrest data in the City was examined for the period spanning 1993 to 2023. Over this 30-year period, a total of 2,229 cannabis-related arrests were recorded citywide, as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2 – Cannabis-Related Arrests by Year, City of Santa Monica (1993-2023) Source: Santa Monica Police Department
Over the past three decades, cannabis-related arrests in the City have followed a dynamic trajectory, reflecting shifts in policy, enforcement priorities, and societal attitudes toward cannabis use. In the early 1990s, arrests were relatively low but began to rise steadily, culminating in a noticeable peak in 1997 with 103 recorded arrests.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1205 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

The late 1990s and early 2000s saw fluctuating arrest numbers, but a large increase occurred in 2004, reaching 157 arrests. In 2007, arrests spiked again to their highest recorded level of 173.

However, this peak appears to be an anomaly in what soon became a downward trend following a significant policy shift in November 2006. That year, the City passed an ordinance establishing Chapter 3.724 in the City Municipal Code, which deprioritized law enforcement actions related to marijuana offenses involving personal adult use. This ordinance made investigations, citations, arrests, property seizures, and prosecutions for such offenses the lowest law enforcement priority in the City.

The timing of this legislation suggests a crucial turning point. While arrests spiked briefly in 2007, the overall trend after 2006 was a steady decline. By 2012, cannabis-related arrests had fallen to

87. This decline continued through the 2010s, with arrests decreasing to 64 by 2018. A key factor that further accelerated the reduction in arrests was the passage of Proposition 64 in 2016, which legalized and decriminalized recreational cannabis use across California. With the legalization of adult-use cannabis, enforcement actions related to personal possession and use were drastically reduced, contributing to an even steeper decline in cannabis-related arrests in Santa Monica and throughout the state.

Cannabis-Related Arrest Types
Figures 3 and 4 provide a historical overview of the types of cannabis-related offenses. The data on cannabis-related arrests in the City from 1993 to 2023 reveals significant shifts in enforcement patterns, particularly in response to legislative changes toward cannabis use. The most frequently cited offense over this period was possession of less than 28.5 grams of cannabis (11357(B) HS), accounting for 1,145 total arrests, followed by possession for sale (11359 HS) with 513 arrests, and transport, import, sale, or gift of cannabis (11360 HS) with 247 arrests. Notably, the number of arrests for possession of small amounts of cannabis peaked in the early 2000s, with 123 arrests recorded in both 2007 and 2008, before declining significantly in the years following the passage of Santa Monica’s Chapter 3.72 ordinance in 2006 and Proposition 64 in 2016. 4 https://ecode360.com/42726729

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1206 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Similarly, possession of concentrated cannabis (11357(A) HS) and possession greater than 28.5 grams (11357(C) HS) show a downward trend, particularly after 2016, reflecting the reduced enforcement of possession-related offenses following legalization. On the other hand, possession for sale (11359 HS) and transport, import, sale, or gift of cannabis (11360 HS) continued to be enforced, although at lower rates after legalization, indicating that law enforcement efforts may have shifted toward regulating illegal sales rather than personal possession. Meanwhile, offenses related to driving under the influence of cannabis (23152(F) VC) remained consistent, with notable spikes in 2016 (46 arrests) and 2017 (38 arrests). This suggests that while cannabis possession laws have relaxed, enforcement related to impaired driving increased in priority.

Offenses involving minors (11357(D), 11357(E), 11357(a) HS) remained relatively low in comparison to adult-related offenses but saw intermittent enforcement, particularly in recent years. This suggests that while adult use has been largely decriminalized, underage possession and involvement in cannabis-related activities remain areas of concern.

The data highlights the significant impact and legal consequences of possession arrests for small amounts of cannabis (11357(B) HS), which accounted for 1,145 total arrests. Prior to major policy reforms, individuals in possession of less than 28.5 grams of cannabis faced criminal penalties, fines, and potential long-term legal repercussions for a product that is now legal.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1207 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Figure 3 – Cannabis-Related Arrest Types (1993-2024)
Figure 4 – Cannabis-Related Arrest Types by Year
Statute 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total 11357(A) HS - - - 3 2 1 2 4 1 5 1 1 7 4 7 10 8 13 8 11 11 11 5 3 - - - - - - - 118 11357(B) HS - - - 45 69 57 48 37 12 18 50 109 40 4 123 123 110 90 60 50 34 23 19 24 - - - - - - - 1,145 11357(C) HS - - - 1 3 - 1 - - 1 - - - - 3 2 3 4 2 1 7 1 4 2 - - - - - - - 35 11357(D) HS - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - 5 11357(E) HS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 4 11357(a) HS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 - - 2 1 6 11357(b) HS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 1 - - - 1 6 11357(c) HS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 - 1 2 2 8 11357(d) HS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 11357.5(A)HS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - 1 11358 HS 4 4 2 3 6 2 - - 7 1 - 3 1 2 2 6 3 2 1 - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - 51 11359 HS 14 21 12 19 13 11 17 16 23 17 33 26 47 26 42 32 17 16 12 22 7 11 8 12 6 5 8 2 4 11 3 513 11360 HS 18 6 4 8 13 8 11 7 14 14 18 24 12 10 9 11 10 9 3 7 1 5 - 4 - 3 8 - 3 3 4 247 11361 HS 1 - 4 4 - - - 1 - - - - 1 - 1 - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 11362.3(A) HS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 1 - - 1 5 23152(F) VC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 10 18 32 46 38 35 22 14 23 250 23222(B) VC 4 3 2 6 2 4 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1208 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Cannabis-Related Arrests by Race/Ethnicity
Figure 5 below illustrates the distribution of cannabis-related arrests by race/ethnicity in the City from 1993 to 2023. Over this period, White individuals accounted for the largest share of arrests (43.7%), followed by Black (26.3%), Hispanic/Latino (24.8%), and Asian (0.4%) populations.

Figure 5 – Cannabis-Related Arrests by Race/Ethnicity, City of Santa Monica (1993- 2023)
To evaluate the disparities in cannabis-related arrests across different demographic groups in the City, arrest rates were analyzed relative to each group's total population share. The findings reveal significant racial and ethnic disparities in enforcement, particularly affecting Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino communities.
 Black/African American individuals faced the highest disproportionate arrest rate.

Despite representing only 5.3% of the City’s population, they accounted for 26.3% of cannabis-related arrests, a rate nearly 5 times higher than their population proportion.  Hispanic/Latino individuals were also disproportionately affected, with arrest rates nearly 1.5 times as high as their population representation.  In contrast, other demographic groups were arrested at rates well below their respective population percentages.

These local disparities mirror national patterns; for example, Black individuals across the U.S. are nearly four times more likely than white individuals to be arrested for cannabis-related offenses, despite similar usage rates5
.
5 American Civil Liberties Union, A Tale of Two Countries: Racially Targeted Arrests in the Era of Marijuana Reform (April 2020). ACLU Policy Report, Available at: https://www.aclu.org/report/tale-two-countriesracially-targeted-arrests-era-marijuana-reform Race/ Ethnicity
Total Percent Total Percent
White 975 43.7% 63,638 69.0%
Black or African American 587 26.3% 4,854 5.3%
Hispanic or Latino 552 24.8% 15,831 17.2%
Asian 8 0.4% 8,156 8.8%
2 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2018-2022 ACS 5-Year Estimates Arrests Population
(1993-2023)1 (2022)2
1 Source: Santa Monica Police Department

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1209 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Figure 6 – Population Percentage vs. Arrest Percentage, City of Santa Monica (1993- 2023)
Source: Santa Monica Police Department
Source: Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Identification of Disproportionately Affected Communities The objective of this Equity Assessment is to identify disproportionately affected communities in the City that have been historically impacted by cannabis criminalization. As demonstrated in the analysis in the previous section, Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino populations have historically been subject to a disproportionate rate of cannabis-related arrests in the City.

Research indicates that such arrests have long-term consequences, limiting opportunities for employment, education, and housing, which, in turn, hinder economic mobility. These systemic barriers combined with the high financial costs of entering the regulated cannabis industry create significant challenges for affected individuals seeking to participate in the legal market.

To determine the communities most impacted, three key indicators were analyzed at the census tract level:
 Race and Ethnicity: Communities of color have historically faced higher cannabis-related arrest rates.
 Income Level: Individuals with lower financial resources encounter greater obstacles in accessing capital and business opportunities within the regulated cannabis industry.  Educational Attainment: Those with lower levels of education often lack access to resources, training, and networks necessary for successful industry entry.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1210 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

By evaluating these indicators alongside the geographic distribution of cannabis-related arrests, this assessment provides a comprehensive understanding of the communities disproportionately affected by cannabis prohibition and enforcement.

Data and Methodology
To identify impacted communities, demographic data was sourced from the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) EJSCREEN tool, which compiles nationwide demographic and environmental data. EJSCREEN’s data, derived from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-year Summary, was used to map and analyze:
 Communities of color (percentage of non-Hispanic white alone vs. all other racial/ethnic groups).
 Low-income households (household incomes at or below twice the federal poverty level).
 Educational attainment (percentage of individuals aged 25 or older without a high school diploma).

People of Color Populations
Figure 7 provides a visual representation of the percentage of individuals within a census tract who list their racial status as a race other than White alone and/or list their ethnicity as Hispanic or Latino; in other words, individuals who do not identify as non-Hispanic white alone. The term "alone" here signifies that the individual identifies with a single racial category, rather than being multiracial.

A clear spatial pattern emerges, showing that arrests are heavily concentrated in the eastern and central parts of the City—particularly in census tracts shaded in red and orange, which represent areas where people of color make up 34% to 67% of the population. In contrast, the western and northern tracts, which have lower percentages of people of color (shaded in green and yellow), show significantly fewer arrests. This visual correlation reinforces the conclusion that communities with larger populations of color have experienced a disproportionate burden of cannabis-related policing. The clustering of arrests in demographically diverse neighborhoods suggests that cannabis enforcement has not been evenly distributed across the city but rather has disproportionately impacted communities of color.

Figure 7 – People of Color as a Percentage of Population

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1211 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Low-Income Populations
Figure 8 displays cannabis-related arrests across the City of Santa Monica overlaid with census tracts color-coded by the percentage of low-income households. Low-income households are defined as those with household incomes at or below twice the federal poverty level.

The analysis reveals a strong spatial correlation between areas of economic disadvantage and the concentration of arrests. Census tracts shaded in red—representing the highest percentages of low-income households (29% to 38%)—show a dense clustering of cannabis arrests, particularly in the central and southern parts of the City. Conversely, tracts in the northern and western areas, shaded green to indicate lower levels of poverty (5% to 14%), exhibit far fewer arrests. This pattern indicates that cannabis enforcement has disproportionately affected lower-income neighborhoods, suggesting that residents in these communities have borne the brunt of criminalization.

Figure 8 – Low-Income Households as a Percentage of Population

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1212 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Educational Attainment
Figure 9 presents cannabis-related arrests in the City overlaid with census tracts shaded by the percentage of residents over age 25 who have not completed high school. Census tracts with the greatest concentration of those who have not completed high school (shown in red and orange) have the highest density of cannabis arrests. These areas, located primarily in the eastern and central parts of the city, stand in sharp contrast to the western and northern tracts shaded in green, where educational attainment is higher (0% to 2% without a diploma), and arrest rates are notably lower. The spatial overlap between educational disadvantage and enforcement activity suggests that residents with fewer educational opportunities have been more heavily targeted by cannabis policing.

Figure 9 – Educational Attainment

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1213 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1214 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Disproportionately Affected Communities Analysis
To identify socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, data was analyzed and ranked using a colorcoded system to categorize census tracts based on their impact level:

Figure 10 presents the spatial relationship between cannabis-related arrests and socioeconomic indicators. A comparative analysis of arrest data and demographic indicators indicates a strong connection between disadvantaged census tracts and the concentration of cannabis-related arrests. Many of the census tracts with the highest arrest numbers also feature a large percentage of residents who are people of color, have lower income levels, and possess lower educational attainment.

Figure 10 – Cannabis Arrests and Socioeconomic Disadvantage by Census Tract Green Minimal Impact
Yellow Low Impact
Orange Moderate Impact
Red High Impact
Census Tract Number of
Arrests
Percent of
Arrests
% People of
Color % Low Income % Not Completed High School
06037701902 854 42.3% 32% 38% 4%
06037702002 202 10.0% 39% 31% 4%
06037701802 196 9.7% 61% 33% 13%
06037702102 129 6.4% 27% 22% 1%
06037701801 100 5.0% 67% 36% 12%
06037701402 97 4.8% 38% 22% 5%
06037702201 79 3.9% 45% 24% 9%
06037701702 63 3.1% 39% 37% 6%
06037701502 54 2.7% 38% 10% 8%
06037702300 53 2.6% 38% 23% 7%
06037701501 35 1.7% 33% 18% 4%
06037702202 28 1.4% 27% 13% 3%
06037701304 27 1.3% 27% 11% 4%
06037701602 26 1.3% 50% 28% 8%
06037701701 25 1.2% 43% 30% 4%
06037701302 22 1.1% 23% 15% 4%
06037701601 13 0.6% 28% 14% 1%
06037701201 10 0.5% 28% 11% 1%
06037701202 7 0.3% 18% 11% 1%

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1215 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Findings
An analysis of cannabis-related arrest data by census tract, alongside key demographic indicators, reveals a strong relationship between enforcement patterns and socio-economic disadvantage.

Arrests are heavily concentrated in a small number of geographic areas, with one census tract (06037701902) alone accounting for over 42% of total arrests. Together, the top four census tracts (06037701902, 06037702002, 06037701802, and 06037702102) represent nearly 70% of all cannabis-related arrests in the City, as illustrated in Figure 11 below. It should be noted that the three western census tracts highlighted in red are the City’s downtown area and beach front that connects to Vencie Beach in the City of Los Angeles. These areas of the City attract tourists, increasing the daytime population.

Figure 11 – Census Tracts with Highest Concentration of Cannabis Arrests

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1216 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

When cross-referenced with demographic characteristics—specifically, the percentage of people of color, percentage of low-income households, and percentage of individuals without a high school diploma—several high-arrest areas also show clear signs of socio-economic disadvantage.

For example, census tracts 06037701802 and 06037701801—encompassing the Pico neighborhood—have some of the highest arrest rates in the area and rank among the most demographically disadvantaged. Over 60% of residents identify as people of color, more than onethird of households are low-income, and a significant portion of the population—well into the double digits—has not completed high school.

Figure 12 – Disadvantaged Census Tracts
By contrast, census tracts with low arrest rates generally reflect lower proportions of people of color, lower poverty rates, and higher levels of educational attainment. Tracts such as 06037701202, 06037701201, and 06037701601, which account for less than 1% of arrests each, consistently rank low across all disadvantage indicators.

Figure 13 – Least Impacted Census Tracts

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1217 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

While there are a few exceptions—such as tract 06037702102, which has a relatively high number of arrests but does not display high levels of disadvantage, the overall trend is consistent:
communities with the highest levels of arrest activity also tend to face the greatest structural barriers.

Conclusions Regarding Disproportionately Affected Communities The data clearly demonstrates that cannabis criminalization has disproportionately impacted specific communities within the City—particularly those characterized by higher concentrations of people of color, lower income levels, and lower educational attainment. Findings from earlier research further contextualize the demographic patterns observed in the arrest data. From 1993 to 2023, cannabis-related arrests in the City disproportionately affected Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino individuals.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1218 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

The findings support the conclusion that historically cannabis prohibition has not been enforced uniformly across the City but has instead been found to burden areas that show clear signs of socioeconomic disadvantage, particularly the census tracts the encompass the Pico neighborhood.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1219 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

2. Overview of Cannabis-Related Businesses and Activities Legislative History of Cannabis in Santa Monica
The regulation of cannabis in the City has evolved significantly over the years, shaped by both local policy decisions and broader state-level reforms. The City’s approach has largely been cautious and highly regulated, with initial policies focused exclusively on medicinal cannabis while prohibiting adult-use (recreational) commercial cannabis activities.

Early Regulations and Medicinal Cannabis (2015–2017)
Santa Monica first established regulations for medical marijuana (medicinal cannabis) in June 2015 as part of a comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update (Article 9 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code). This ordinance allowed for up to two medicinal cannabis retailers within the City, subject to a rigorous regulatory permit and selection process. However, all other cannabisrelated activities—including adult-use sales, cultivation, manufacturing, and distribution— remained prohibited.

The City also imposed strict zoning restrictions on where these medicinal cannabis retailers could operate. They were permitted only within limited sections of Wilshire Boulevard and Santa Monica Boulevard, specifically in Mixed-Use Boulevard Low (MUBL), Mixed-Use Boulevard (MUB), or General Commercial (GC) zones, and required approval through a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). These restrictions reflected Santa Monica’s deliberate and incremental approach to cannabis regulation, prioritizing controlled access to medicinal cannabis while limiting broader industry growth.

Prohibition of Adult-Use Cannabis and Expanded Medicinal Regulations (2017) Following the passage of Proposition 64 in 2016, which legalized adult-use (recreational) cannabis in California, local jurisdictions were given the authority to regulate or prohibit commercial cannabis activities within their borders. On March 7, 2017, the Santa Monica City Council formally directed staff to prohibit adult-use commercial cannabis activities.

At the same time, the City sought to refine and expand its regulations for medicinal cannabis to align with evolving state laws. The Council directed staff to:
 Develop a regulatory permit and selection process for medicinal cannabis retailers.  Amend the Santa Monica Municipal Code to address state law changes.  Explore options for allowing limited, non-volatile medicinal cannabis manufacturing.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1220 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

On October 24, 2017, the City Council adopted an Interim Zoning Ordinance (IZO) which formally established general regulations for commercial cannabis activities, including the following:
 A regulatory permit process for medicinal cannabis retailers and non-volatile manufacturing.
 Prohibition of all adult-use commercial cannabis activities, including retail sales, cultivation, testing, distribution, and manufacturing.
 Conformance with state law changes regarding medicinal cannabis regulation.

The IZO was a temporary measure intended to provide structure and oversight for medicinal cannabis businesses. After an extensive selection process, Santa Monica approved two medicinal cannabis retailers.

Current Status Cannabis Activity in Santa Monica
In July 2022 the City Council placed Measure HMP on the ballot. This measure proposed a tax structure for cannabis businesses, signaling the City’s recognition of the economic potential of the cannabis industry. When put to a vote in November 2022, residents demonstrated strong support, approving the measure by a decisive 66% to 34% margin.

Building on this momentum, the City Council held study sessions in June 2023 and April 2024 to explore the future of adult-use cannabis in Santa Monica. During these sessions, the Council made several key policy determinations. The Council directed staff to expand cannabis business opportunities beyond medicinal use, allowing for all types of adult-use cannabis businesses, not just retail dispensaries.

Two specific directives from this session are particularly relevant to ongoing equity efforts:

1. Allow Existing Medicinal Cannabis Retailers to Sell Adult-Use Cannabis – This directive provides a pathway for the City’s permitted medicinal dispensaries to transition into the broader adult-use market, ensuring continuity and expansion of legal access.

2. Develop a Social Equity Program – Recognizing the disproportionate impact of past cannabis enforcement on marginalized communities, the Council directed staff to conduct a cannabis equity assessment and to design a cannabis equity program. This initiative aims to provide opportunities and support for individuals and communities most affected by historical cannabis-related policing, aligning Santa Monica’s cannabis policy with broader social justice goals.

In November 2023, the Council passed an Interim Zoning Ordinance allowing the City's two medicinal cannabis retailers to begin adult-use sales, providing an initial pathway for expansion.

This ordinance was further extended in December 2023, demonstrating the City’s commitment to transitioning toward a regulated adult-use market.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1221 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

The ongoing development of adult-use cannabis regulations and social equity initiatives will be crucial in addressing past harms, expanding economic opportunities, and ensuring a more inclusive and just cannabis industry in Santa Monica.

Taxation
On November 8, 2022, Santa Monica voters approved Measure HMP implementing a Cannabis Business Tax for the City. The measure imposed a gross receipts tax capped at 10% on all cannabis businesses. The current tax rates are as follows:
 3% of gross receipts for non-medicinal cannabis retailers  2% of gross receipts for medicinal cannabis retailers  1% of gross receipts for other licensed cannabis businesses

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1222 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

3. Barriers to Entry
Understanding the barriers to entry into the cannabis industry for populations and communities who have been disproportionately or negatively impacted by cannabis enforcement is an important factor when developing and implementing an equity program. The success of a local equity program is dependent on the program’s ability to reduce and eliminate these barriers. This section examines the prominent barriers to entry, which can be summarized into the following categories: Financial, Technical, and Criminal.
 Financial barriers: These barriers can include the high costs of starting and operating a cannabis business, such as licensing fees, insurance, and other expenses. Affected communities may have difficulty accessing capital or may lack the financial resources to cover these costs.
 Technical barriers: These barriers can include a lack of knowledge about the cannabis industry and the regulatory environment, as well as a lack of access to resources and support to help aspiring cannabis entrepreneurs succeed.  Criminal barriers: These barriers can include the collateral consequences of cannabisrelated arrests and convictions, such as barriers to employment, education, and housings. These consequences can make it difficult for affected individuals to enter the legal cannabis industry.

Addressing these barriers is crucial to promoting fairness and equity in the cannabis industry and helping affected communities succeed as entrepreneurs. Cannabis equity programs can provide financial assistance, business development resources, and technical assistance to help individuals and communities overcome these barriers and enter the legal cannabis industry. It is important for these programs to be designed and implemented in a way that addresses the specific needs and challenges faced by affected communities.

Financial Barriers
When starting any business, financial barriers are among of the most common obstacles entrepreneurs face due to the high costs of local and State licensing fees and the tax burdens, especially in the regulated cannabis industry. Financial barriers present an even bigger challenge for economically disadvantaged individuals who have been disproportionately impacted by cannabis enforcement.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1223 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Access to capital or financing – start-up and operational Starting and operating a cannabis business often requires significant amounts of capital including funds for licenses, equipment, product, and other expenses. For individuals or businesses who do not have access to capital, it can be difficult to enter the industry or succeed as entrepreneurs.

Many individuals and businesses, particularly communities that have been disproportionately impacted, seeking to enter the cannabis industry may have limited access to credit, which can make it difficult to secure the financing needed to start and operate a business. This may be due to a lack of credit history, collateral, or other factors.

Furthermore, existing federal banking regulations prevent most financial institutions from lending to cannabis businesses. Hence, cannabis businesses must rely on access to capital from personal wealth, friends and family, and investors for start-up costs. The impeded access to banking services also negatively affects the ability for cannabis businesses to run as efficiently. This barrier is more pronounced for disproportionately affected communities who may not have access to private funding.

Access to real estate
Access to real estate can be a significant barrier to entry for individuals and businesses seeking to enter the cannabis industry, particularly for those who do not have the financial resources to purchase or lease property. This barrier may be due to a variety of factors, including:
 High cost of real estate: The cost of real estate in many areas, particularly in urban areas, can be high, making it difficult for individuals or businesses with limited financial resources to afford the necessary space for a cannabis business.  Limited availability of real estate: In some areas, the availability of real estate that is suitable for a cannabis business may be limited, which can make it difficult for businesses to find the space they need.
 Zoning restrictions: Many localities have zoning laws that regulate the types of businesses that can operate in specific areas, and cannabis businesses may be restricted to certain areas or may be prohibited entirely. This can make it difficult for businesses to find suitable locations.
 Discrimination: Some landlords and property owners may be unwilling to rent or sell property to cannabis businesses due to negative attitudes towards the industry or concerns about legal risks. This can create barriers for businesses seeking to enter the cannabis industry.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1224 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

By addressing these barriers and others, equity programs can help to promote fairness and equity in the cannabis industry and support the success of affected communities as entrepreneurs. This may include providing financial assistance to help with the cost of real estate, working to reduce zoning restrictions, or addressing discrimination in the real estate market.

Licensing and regulatory fees
In addition to traditional business start-up (e.g., real estate, inventory, equipment, staffing, marketing, etc.) and operational costs, regulated cannabis businesses typically have a higher financial burden from state and local municipalities’ licensing and regulatory fees. Licensing fees can be a significant barrier to entry for individuals and businesses seeking to enter the cannabis industry, particularly for those who do not have the financial resources to cover these fees.

Licensing fees may be required at various stages of the cannabis business process, including:
 Application fees: Many jurisdictions require applicants to pay a fee when they apply for a cannabis business license. These fees vary widely depending on the jurisdiction and the type of license being sought.
 Annual renewal fees: In many jurisdictions, cannabis business licenses must be renewed annually, and a fee may be required to do so. These fees can be a burden for businesses with limited financial resources.
 Compliance fees: In addition to licensing fees, some jurisdictions may also require cannabis businesses to pay fees to cover the cost of compliance activities, such as inspections and audits.

By addressing these barriers and others, equity programs can help to promote fairness and equity in the cannabis industry and support the success of affected communities as entrepreneurs. This may include providing financial assistance to help cover licensing fees and other costs or working to reduce or eliminate these fees for certain groups or individuals.

Technical Barriers
Technical barriers can refer to a range of challenges and obstacles that can prevent individuals or businesses from participating in the cannabis industry, even if they are otherwise qualified and capable. Barriers can include the following.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1225 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Business Ownership
The cannabis industry is highly specialized and requires significant industry knowledge and access to a network of regulated vendors. Additionally, traditional business experience is needed such as business plans, payroll taxes, inventory management, etc. Lastly, the cannabis business marketplace has historically been secretive and underground resulting in information and experience flowing slowly to new interested parties. Again, these barriers are more pronounced for disproportionately affected communities.

Legal and Regulatory
The cannabis industry is heavily regulated at the state and local level, and navigating these regulations can be complex and burdensome, particularly for those who are new to the industry.

This can include requirements related to licensing, zoning, and other areas of compliance. Some aspects of the cannabis industry, such as cultivation and manufacturing, require specialized knowledge and expertise. For individuals or businesses who do not have this expertise, it can be difficult to enter the industry or succeed as entrepreneurs.

Awareness
Awareness of the significant business opportunities within the legal and regulated cannabis marketplace continues to be a significant barrier. Moreover, equity-based programs intended to support disproportionately affected communities’ access into the legal cannabis industry have also struggled to be well-known within these communities. Additional outreach is needed in impacted communities to better daylight opportunities through the equity program.

Distrust of Government
Distrust in government can be a significant barrier to the success of cannabis equity programs, as it can discourage affected communities from participating in the programs or engaging with government agencies and officials. This distrust may be based on a range of factors, including historical and ongoing injustices, such as racial profiling and discrimination, and a lack of transparency and accountability on the part of government.

To address this barrier, it is important for cannabis equity programs to be designed and implemented in a way that is transparent, accessible, and fair, and that considers the specific needs and challenges faced by affected communities. This may include:

1. Involving affected communities in the design and implementation of the program.

Engaging with affected communities and seeking their input and feedback on the equity program can help to build trust and ensure that the program is responsive to their needs and concerns.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1226 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

2. Being transparent about the program's goals, objectives, and funding sources. Providing clear and transparent information about the program's goals, objectives, and funding sources can help to build trust and accountability.

3. Establishing clear and fair eligibility requirements: Establishing clear and fair eligibility requirements for the equity program can help to build trust and ensure that the program is accessible and fair to all affected communities.

4. Providing ongoing support and assistance. Providing ongoing support and assistance to affected communities as they participate in the equity program can help to build trust and ensure that the program is successful in promoting fairness and equity.

By addressing issues of distrust and building trust with affected communities, cannabis equity programs can be more effective in promoting fairness and equity in the cannabis industry.

Criminal Barriers
Criminal records (often exposed through background checks) significantly impede an individual’s ability to succeed in this industry, both as an owner and/or an employee. Former felons are often discriminated against by employers and in many cases earn a lower wage, get recommended for jobs less often, and tend to associate with individuals that also have fewer opportunities. In addition, a past criminal history can present significant challenges for cannabis operators such as accessing financing, loans, or even signing a lease.

These barriers can include the collateral consequences of cannabis-related arrests and convictions, such as barriers to employment, education, and housing. These consequences can make it difficult for affected individuals to enter the legal cannabis industry.

A criminal history, particularly a history of cannabis-related arrests and convictions, can have a significant impact on an individual's ability to enter the legal cannabis industry. This is because many states have laws that disqualify individuals with certain criminal convictions from obtaining licenses to operate cannabis businesses or from working in the cannabis industry.

In some cases, these laws may be based on a blanket ban on individuals with any criminal convictions, regardless of the nature or severity of the offense. In other cases, the laws may only disqualify individuals with certain types of convictions, such as convictions for violent crimes or drug offenses.

The impact of these laws can be especially significant for communities that have been disproportionately affected by cannabis criminalization, as they may have higher rates of arrests and convictions, even for low-level offenses. This can make it difficult for these communities to enter the legal cannabis industry, even if they are otherwise qualified and capable of operating successful businesses.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1227 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

4. Community Outreach and Feedback
In addition to the analysis conducted in Section 1 above, outreach and education are an essential component of this Equity Assessment as they help to ensure widespread dissemination and comprehension of the assessment’s findings by the communities that the study is intended to benefit. The Equity Assessment incorporated data collected through stakeholder interviews, community workshops, surveys, and community-led discussions, which helped provide public input to guide the City with the development of its equity program.

Online Survey
In October of 2024, an online survey was conducted to ensure broad community engagement.

The survey, available in both English and Spanish, was promoted across various channels to encourage participation from residents throughout the City. The survey gathered insights from 170 respondents, highlighting public opinions, concerns, and recommendations regarding cannabis business and equity programs in the City. The complete findings of the survey are detailed in Appendix A and B of this report. The bullets below summarize key takeaways from the survey6
:
 Support for Cannabis Equity Program
o 54% of respondents support the creation of a Cannabis Equity Program in Santa Monica.
o 46% of respondents do not support such a program.
 Demographics of Respondents
o 88% of respondents live in Santa Monica.
o 39% of respondents work in the city.
 Impacts of Cannabis Criminalization
o 20% of respondents reported knowing someone convicted of a cannabisrelated crime, indicating potential concerns about the impact of past criminalization.
 Interest & Involvement in Cannabis
o 40% of respondents identified as recreational consumers. 6 Note: Percentages may exceed 100% because respondents were allowed to select more than one option for certain questions.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1228 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

o 33% of respondents identified as interested parties.
o 47% of respondents were impacted by past cannabis criminalization. o 5% of respondents are current cannabis business owners.  Preferred Types of Cannabis Businesses
o 62% of respondents want retail storefronts.
o 54% of respondents want retail delivery services.
o 52% of respondents want consumption lounges.
o 48% of respondents want special events allowing cannabis use.  Barriers to Cannabis Business Ownership
o 50% of respondents identified the local permitting process as a major barrier.
o 43% of respondents identified high fees as a major barrier. o 40% of respondents identified state licensing and application process as a major barrier.
o 38% of respondents identified access to capital as a major barrier.  Barriers to Entering the Cannabis Workforce
o 50% of respondents identified the lack of awareness of job opportunities as a barrier.
o 26% of respondents identified low pay for entry-level jobs as a barrier. o 11% of respondents identified the limited opportunities to break into the industry as a barrier.
o 14% of respondents identified criminal background checks as a barrier.  Recommended Strategies for Cannabis Equity
o 38% of respondents selected improved access to capital (e.g. grants and funding for equity applicants).
o 29% of respondents selected reduced licensing fees and fee waivers for qualifying individuals).
o 29% of respondents selected mentorship programs (e.g. business guidance for aspiring entrepreneurs).
o 18% of respondents selected workforce development programs (e.g. job training and education).
 Eligibility Criteria for Equity Applicant
o 36% of respondents prioritized income level.
o 32% of respondents prioritized area of residence.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1229 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

o 12% of respondents prioritized prior cannabis-related arrest record. o 7% of respondents prioritized residency duration in Santa Monica.

Community Workshops
To better understand the perspective of the community in regard to developing a local cannabis equity program, the City and SCI Consulting Group hosted two community workshops. These workshops are detailed below:
 Community Workshop #1 (November 13th, 2024, from 6:00-8:00pm at the Ken Edwards Center)
 Community Workshop #2 (February 27th, 2025, from 6:00-8:00pm at the Pico Branch Library)
The primary purpose of these workshops was twofold: (1) to disseminate crucial information about the City's forthcoming Cannabis Equity Assessment and (2) to actively seek public input and gather valuable perspectives on the community's needs, opportunities, and obstacles that may shape the development of the City’s future Cannabis Equity Program. The meeting aimed to foster an inclusive environment where attendees could receive comprehensive details regarding the proposed Cannabis Equity Program. It served as a platform for the City and SCI Consulting Group to share insights, guidelines, and objectives related to the program. Participants had the opportunity to gain an in-depth understanding of the City's vision, goals, and strategies for promoting social equity in the cannabis industry.

Moreover, the workshops strived to encourage active engagement from the community by providing space for public comments and suggestions. Attendees were invited to share their thoughts, perspectives, and recommendations on ways the City could implement a Cannabis Equity Program. This feedback was deemed vital to ensure that the program aligned with the needs and aspirations of the community it intended to serve. Recordings of both workshops along with the presentation were uploaded to the City’s equity webpage for public access. 7 Stakeholder Interviews
Key stakeholders in the City were engaged through one-on-one interviews, serving as an additional method for collecting essential data. Two rounds of stakeholder meetings occurred between December 2024 through February 2025. In total, nine interviews were conducted, involving stakeholders from diverse sectors:
7 https://www.santamonica.gov/cannabis-social-equity

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1230 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

 Cannabis business owners
 Community members impacted by the War on Drugs
 Prospective equity applicants
 Interested parties
Community-Led Discussions (Micro-grant)
Lastly, the City offered $500 micro-grants to support community members in hosting small, community-led events focused on cannabis social equity. The grants were intended to make these gatherings more inclusive and accessible by covering costs such as food, childcare, language interpretation, note-taking services, or other accommodations that help create welcoming spaces where all voices can be heard. Given the nature of the subject matter, it was important to provide an opportunity to hear from the community without government involvement. A total of seven grants were awarded, resulting in seven distinct community-led discussions that engaged 101 participants in total.

Summary of Feedback and Common Themes
The feedback provided from the outreach efforts underscores the multifaceted nature of challenges facing equity applicants in the cannabis industry. The participants highlighted several critical issues facing equity applicants in the cannabis sector, emphasizing the need for an inclusive and effective equity program tailored to local needs. Key themes included the significant financial, regulatory, and societal barriers that inhibit the entry and success of equity applicants in the industry.

Historical Harms and Ongoing Stigma
Many participants shared personal or second-hand experiences with the negative impacts of cannabis criminalization, which included accounts of arrests, incarceration, and long-term consequences stemming from cannabis-related offenses. These experiences often altered the trajectory of individuals’ lives, resulting in the loss of educational opportunities, employment barriers, and mental health trauma. The Pico neighborhood was repeatedly identified as a focal point of over-policing and community-level harm, with some stakeholders likening the experience to “living in fear.” Even post-legalization, stigma persists, particularly affecting communities of color and immigrant residents. Several individuals noted being judged or discriminated against for their cannabis use—especially for medicinal purposes—and called for greater public education to reduce stigma and increase awareness of the health benefits of cannabis.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1231 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Barriers to Entry
Barriers to entering the legal cannabis industry were a major concern across all participants.

Financial obstacles were the most commonly cited challenge, including the cost of applying for a license, navigating regulatory requirements, and obtaining start-up capital. Challenges include difficulties in securing funding, navigating complex financial processes, and the lack of traditional banking services due to federal restrictions. High reliance on non-traditional financing methods, such as predatory lending or personal savings, poses a significant risk for long-term sustainability.

Many participants also pointed to the lack of accessible and culturally competent guidance on how to engage with the legal cannabis market. For individuals with past convictions, the licensing process felt especially exclusionary, often disqualifying those whom equity programs are intended to support.

Systemic Failures of Existing Equity Programs
There was strong skepticism about the effectiveness of existing cannabis equity programs across California. Participants expressed frustration with the lack of follow-through, insufficient community reinvestment, and the persistence of stigma even after legalization. Several participants shared negative experiences with equity programs in other California jurisdictions, citing broken promises, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and inequitable outcomes. Concerns were raised that Santa Monica might lack the capacity, staffing, or commitment to run a truly inclusive program. One participant said they were “fearful of trying to apply again” after repeated failure and disappointment.

Predatory Practices
Participants voiced strong concerns about the risk of predatory behavior targeting equity applicants. Many warned that without safeguards, individuals eligible for equity benefits could be exploited by more experienced or well-funded partners who offer financial backing or management support in exchange for majority control or ownership. These arrangements—often structured to appear compliant—can leave equity licensees as figureheads with little real power or profit. Stakeholders cited similar patterns in other cities, where equity programs were manipulated through “rent-a-person” models that undermined the spirit of equity and led to extractive partnerships. Participants stressed the need for strong oversight, clear ownership guidelines, and legal support to protect equity applicants from entering exploitative agreements out of desperation or lack of experience.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1232 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Concerns Regarding Program Expansion and Licensing
Participants expressed significant concerns about Santa Monica expanding its adult-use cannabis program with unlimited licensing. Many feared that opening the market too broadly would lead to oversaturation, making it difficult for equity applicants and small businesses to compete against large, well-funded operators. There was a strong sentiment that unlimited licensing could dilute the purpose of the equity program, especially if equity applicants are not given early and prioritized access to the market. Participants urged the City to avoid repeating the mistakes of other jurisdictions, where equity efforts were undermined by lack of regulation and corporate dominance. Many recommended a phased approach, starting with a limited number of licenses reserved for equity applicants, to ensure meaningful inclusion and long-term success.

Concerns About Real Estate and Zoning
Participantsidentified real estate and zoning as major barriers to cannabis equity in Santa Monica.

High commercial rents, limited available properties, and landlord resistance make it extremely difficult for equity applicants to secure compliant locations. Several participants emphasized that Santa Monica’s limited commercial space, paired with high real estate costs, creates a nearimpossible landscape for small or equity-owned cannabis businesses. Participants also raised concerns that restrictive zoning could push cannabis businesses into high-cost or less accessible areas, further disadvantaging small and equity-owned operators.

Desire for Education, Transparency, and Inclusion
Participants requested ongoing community engagement, transparency in program development, and regular updates on progress. There was a call for better public education around cannabis laws, social equity goals, and safe consumption. Additionally, several discussions highlighted the importance of creating inclusive public spaces, such as consumption lounges, and ensuring the broader community feels informed and involved.

Suggested Recommendations and Equity-Focused Solutions:

Despite these challenges, participants offered clear and constructive recommendations for how Santa Monica could build an impactful and credible equity program. These included investing in outreach and education campaigns focused on cannabis licensing, record expungement, and financial empowerment. There was strong interest in support services such as business training, legal assistance, and access to capital through grants or low-interest loans. Reinvestment of cannabis tax revenue back into impacted communities—especially the Pico neighborhood—was viewed as essential.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1233 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Lastly, participants emphasized the importance of designing a program that centers the voices and leadership of individuals directly harmed by cannabis prohibition, ensuring that equity licensees are not just tokenized but empowered with real ownership and decision-making authority.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1234 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

5. Best Practices
The following section reviews equity programs in several California jurisdictions including the cities of Oakland, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Long Beach, and Sacramento. This review provides a comparative analysis of various equity programs at a glance to establish best practices for Santa Monica to utilize. Each of these assessments highlight eligibility requirements for the equity program, available financial assistance for program participants, advantages related to licensing and permitting for participants, and other program benefits provided to equity applicants.

City of Oakland (2017)
Eligibility Criteria
To qualify for the local equity program, a local equity applicant must:
 Be a resident of Oakland;
 Have an annual income at or less than 80% of Oakland’s Average Medium Income (AMI) adjusted for household size; and
 Either: (i) Has lived in any combination of Oakland police beats 2X, 2Y, 6X, 7X, 19X, 21X, 21Y, 23X, 26Y, 27X, 27Y, 29X, 30X, 30Y, 31Y, 32X, 33X, 34X, 5X, 8X and 35X for at least ten of the last twenty years or (ii) Was arrested after November 5, 1996 and convicted of a cannabis crime committed in Oakland.

Financial Assistance
Loan Program:

The Equity Loan Program provides Interest-free loans to eligible cannabis equity applicants. This program is funded through their cannabis tax revenue and loan repayments are used to support forthcoming loans for equity applicants. Loan disbursements are structured into several tiers, each designed to support applicants in building and maintaining viable businesses. It is important to note that in September 2020, the loan term was extended from four to six years, allowing for more flexibility. As of June 2022, the loan tier amounts were established as follows:
 Tier 1 - Establish the Business: $5,000
 Tier 2 - Become Compliant: $10,000
 Tier 3 - Open the Business: $15,000
 Tier 4 - Start Operations: $25,000
 Tier 5 - Grow the Business: $60,000

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1235 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

 Tier 6 - Expand Business: $35,000
Grant Program:

The City of Oakland's Cannabis Equity Grant Program utilizes funding from the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development ("Go-Biz") to offer grants to entrepreneurs participating in Oakland's cannabis equity program. The grants are distributed in tiers, strategically structured to assist Equity Applicants in building sustainable and thriving businesses. If an Equity Applicant successfully fulfills the requirements of all five grant tiers, they become eligible to receive a maximum grant amount of $150,000 as outlined below:
 Tier 1 - Establish the Business: $5,000
 Tier 2 - Become Compliant: $10,000
 Tier 3 - Open the Business: $15,000
 Tier 4 - Start Operations: $25,000
 Tier 5 - Grow the Business: $60,000
 Tier 6 - Expand Business: $35,000
Workforce Development Grant:

The City’s Workforce Development Grant Program provides up to $50,000 for each equity applicant that recruits, trains, and retains a qualified and diverse workforce. This program is funded through a $1,000,000 grant received from Go-Biz. As of January 8, 2021, all funds available have been allocated to applicants for the Workforce Development Grant Program.

Licensing and Permitting
 Fee waivers and exemptions.
 Equity and general cannabis permits are issued on a 1:1 ratio.

Additional Program Services
 Technical assistance and training
 Pro bono legal services
 Cannabis Incubator Program
 Shared use manufacturing facilities
 Purchasing property grants
Staffing
The City of Oakland’s Cannabis Equity Program is administered by the Economic & Workforce Development Department. The City has also established the Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC), which is a citizen-led advisory body that provides recommendations to the City Council on cannabis licensure, taxation, and regulatory policies.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1236 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

City of San Francisco (2017)
Eligibility Criteria
To qualify as an Equity Applicant, you must:
 Apply as a person, not a company.
 Be one of the following:
o The business owner.
o Own at least 40% of the business and be the CEO.
o Own at least 51% of the business.
o A board member of a non-profit cannabis business where most of the board also qualify as Equity Applicants.
o An individual with a membership interest in a cannabis business formed as a cooperative.
 Meet at least three of the following six equity conditions:
o Have a household income below 80% of the average median income (AMI) in San Francisco for 2018.
o Have been arrested for or convicted of the sale, possession, use, manufacture, or cultivation of cannabis (including as a juvenile) from 1971 to 2016.
o Have a parent, sibling or child who was arrested for or convicted of the sale, possession, use, manufacture, or cultivation of cannabis (including as a juvenile) from 1971 to 2016.
o Lost housing in San Francisco after 1995 through eviction, foreclosure, or subsidy cancellation.
o Attended school in the San Francisco Unified School District for a total of 5 years from 1971 to 2016.
o Have lived in San Francisco census tracts for a total of 5 years from 1971 to 2016 where at least 17% of the households had incomes at or below the federal poverty level.

Financial Assistance
Grant Program:

San Francisco’s “Step by Step” grant program provides grants to eligible equity cannabis businesses for start-up and ongoing costs. Equity businesses can obtain grants for up to $55,000- $75,000. Grant funds may be used for the following eligible expenses:
 Rent  Regulatory compliance

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1237 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

 Legal assistance
 Application and regulatory fees
 Testing of cannabis
 Furniture
 Fixtures and equipment
 Capital improvements
 Banking and escrow fees
 Accounting services
 Packaging and materials
 Marketing and advertising
 Tax liability of the cannabis business
Licensing and Permitting
 Fee waivers and exemptions.
 Priority processing of applications.

Additional Program Services
 Technical assistance and training
o Professional development
o Security consulting
o Permitting and grants services
 Pro bono legal services
Staffing
The City of San Francisco’s cannabis program is overseen by the Office of Cannabis, a dedicated agency for cannabis regulation, which was established in 2017 and ensures compliance with local and state laws and promotes public health, safety, and social equity.

City of Sacramento (2018)
Eligibility Criteria
 Classification 1: Lives or have lived in a low-income household in Sacramento AND: (a) Have been arrested in Sacramento for cannabis–related crime between 1980-2011 or (b) An immediate family member who meets the description above.  Classification 2: Lived in a low-income household in the following zip codes for five consecutive years between 1980 and 2011: 95811, 95815, 95817, 95820, 95823, 95824, 95826, 95828, 95818, 95838 and 95832.
 Classification 3: Businesses with no less than 51% ownership by Classifications 1 and 2 individuals.
 Classification 4: CORE Program Incubator
 Classification 5: Cannabis Social Enterprise with no less than 51% ownership by Classifications 1 and 2 individuals.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1238 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Financial Assistance
Loan Program:

The CORE Capital Loan Program is a 6-year, zero-interest loan program offered to cannabis equity businesses, funded by grants from Go-Biz. Repayments from loans are reinvested into the program to provide ongoing loan opportunities for CORE participants. The maximum initial loan amount for first-time applicants is $50,000, provided they have a signed business lease for a location or own a premise. A verified CORE individual has the option to apply for $50,000 for each leased or owned location. Loan applicants can request Follow-on Loans in $50,000 increments.

Grant Program:

The CORE Grant Program is a noncompetitive, tiered grant process where the amount allocated to each tier is determined by the number of qualified applicants. Grant awards range from a minimum of $10,000 to a maximum amount determined by the total number of valid applications received during the application period. The program is funded through grant funds received by Go-Biz.

Qualifying Categories/Tiers:
 Business with no Business Operating Permit (Tiers 1-4) o Tier 1 - Applied for CUP
o Tier 2 - Has CUP (approved or existing – must be consistent with the use for proposed cannabis business)
o Tier 3 - Building Permits Issued
o Tier 4 - Certificate of Occupancy Issued
o Tier 4 B - Permitted shared-user that has Business Operating Permit of a permitted shared-use manufacturing facility that has both Business Operating Permit and Certificate of Occupancy
 Business with Business Operating Permit (Tier 5)
o Tier 5 - Business Operating Permit Issued
o Tier 5 B - Permitted shared-user that has Business Operating Permit of a permitted shared-use manufacturing facility that has both Business Operating Permit and Certificate of Occupancy
Licensing and Permitting
 Fee waivers and exemptions.
 Priority processing of applications.
 Exclusive access to any future storefront dispensary permits.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1239 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Additional Program Services
 Technical assistance and training
 Cannabis Incubator Program
Staffing
The City of Sacramento has a dedicated Office of Cannabis Management (OCM), which operates under the City Manager’s Office. This office oversees the regulation, permitting, and policy development for cannabis businesses within the city.

City of Los Angeles (2017)
Eligibility Criteria
To be verified as a Social Equity Individual Applicant, an applicant must satisfy two of the three following criteria:
 Cannabis arrest or conviction in California for any crime relating to the sale, possession, use, manufacture, or cultivation of cannabis that occurred prior to November 8, 2016.  10 years of cumulative residency in a Disproportionately Impacted Area as defined by police reporting districts.
 Qualify as Low Income in the 2020 or 2021 calendar year.

Financial Assistance
Grant Program:

The Social Equity Entrepreneur Development Rental Assistance Grant Program (SEED Rental Grant Program), funded by Go-Biz, offers grants to equity applicants who have active cannabis applications and have secured leases or binding Letters of Intent. Retail equity applicants can receive $50,000 in grant funds distributed over three disbursements. Non-retail equity applicants may receive a single disbursement of $10,000 in grant funds.

Licensing and Permitting
 Fee waivers and exemptions.
 Priority processing of applications.
 Retail permit lottery.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1240 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Additional Program Services
 Business, licensing, compliance, and technical assistance  Pro-bono and low-bono legal services program
Staffing
The City of Los Angeles has a dedicated Department of Cannabis Regulation (DCR), which oversees the City's commercial cannabis industry. Established following the legalization of adult-use cannabis in California, the DCR is responsible for regulating cannabis businesses, ensuring compliance with local and state laws, and promoting equitable participation in the industry.

City of Long Beach (2018)
Eligibility Criteria
An Equity Applicant must satisfy the following criteria:
 Be a natural person; and
 In the last year, have had an annual family income at or below 80% of the Los AngelesLong Beach-Glendale (LA County) Area Median Income (AMI), and a net worth below $250,000; and
 Have lived in a Long Beach census tract for a minimum of five (5) years, either consecutively or in total, where at least 51% of current residents have a household income at or below 80% of the Los Angeles Area Median Income; and  Was either: (1) during the period of 1971-2016, arrested for, convicted of, or adjudged to be a ward of the juvenile court for any crime under the laws of California or any other jurisdiction relating to the sale, possession, use, manufacture, or cultivation of cannabis; or (2) during the period of 1971-2016, has a parent, sibling, or child who was arrested for, convicted of, or adjudged to be a ward of the juvenile court for any crime under the laws of California or any other jurisdiction relating to the sale, possession, use, manufacture, or cultivation of cannabis.

Financial Assistance
Grant Program:

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1241 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

The Cannabis Equity Direct Grants Program, funded by GO Biz, offers grants to local cannabis equity entrepreneurs. Grants are distributed at four key stages of the business license process, aiding Equity Applicants in establishing sustainable cannabis businesses. The grant amount varies depending on the type of cannabis business and the size of the facility if an Equity Applicant fulfills all milestones' requirements.

Grant Milestones:
 Milestone #1: Securing Your Business Location
 Milestone #2: Drawing Up Plans
 Milestone #3: Starting Construction
 Milestone #4: Opening Your Business
Licensing and Permitting
 Fee waivers and exemptions.
 Priority processing of applications.
 Application workshops.
 Exclusive access to any future storefront dispensary permits.

Additional Program Services
 Technical assistance and training.
 Community Reinvestment Program.
o Adult-use cannabis businesses must submit plans outlining their strategies for supporting and reinvesting in communities that have been most affected by the War on Drugs.
 Cannabis Equity Employment Program.
o Adult-use cannabis businesses must have equity employees working for at least 40% of the total annual work hours at the establishment.

Staffing
The City of Long Beach has a dedicated Office of Cannabis Oversight (OCO), which operates under the City Manager’s Office. Established following the passage of Measure MM in 2016 and the Adult-Use Cannabis Ordinance in 2018, the OCO is responsible for regulating and overseeing all commercial cannabis activities within the city.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1242 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

6. Findings
Each of the following findings are rooted in best practices from peer cities, data analysis, and community outreach and feedback. They present key takeaways to help formulate the recommendations in the following chapter for a successful equity program.

1. Unrestricted Permitting and Licensing May Have Consequences Lessons from other jurisdictions underscore the risks associated with rapid or unstructured cannabis market expansion. While unrestricted adult-use licensing can stimulate economic growth and broaden participation, it often results in market oversaturation, dominance by large corporations, and the displacement of small, community-rooted operators. These dynamics are particularly harmful to equity applicants, who frequently lack the financial resources, infrastructure, and political influence to compete. Without intentional policy design and protective measures, there is a high risk that equity licensees will be pushed out of the marketplace, undermining the program’s goals.

2. Program Eligibility Criteria Should Prioritize Those Most Harmed by Cannabis Enforcement
An effective equity program must prioritize those most impacted by historical cannabis criminalization. This includes individuals with past cannabis-related arrests or convictions, lowincome residents, and those living in communities disproportionately targeted by enforcement.

To ensure that opportunities reach those for whom the program is intended, Santa Monica should adopt clear, inclusive, and data-driven eligibility criteria. Considerations include:
 Documented cannabis arrest or conviction (self or immediate family).  Household income below 80% of Area Median Income (AMI).  Residency in a disproportionately impacted area or in the City.  Ownership and control of the applying business.
 Tiered eligibility to support varying levels of need.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1243 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

3. Application and Permitting Processes Present Barriers to Entry Complex and costly application processes can exclude otherwise eligible equity applicants. High permit fees, extensive documentation requirements, and lengthy timelines often favor wellcapitalized applicants. Streamlining and simplifying these processes, while maintaining accountability and integrity, will help reduce barriers and foster meaningful participation from equity entrepreneurs.

4. Systemic Barriers Limit Access to the Regulated Marketplace Even when eligibility criteria are met, equity applicants face persistent structural challenges, including lack of start-up capital, limited access to legal and technical assistance, and the lingering consequences of a criminal record. These barriers must be actively addressed through wraparound services, financial assistance, and targeted interventions that level the playing field.

5. Equity Applicants are Vulnerable to Exploitative Partnerships Many equity applicants enter the market with limited business experience and few financial resources, making them susceptible to exploitative arrangements. Stakeholders cited ongoing concerns with “rent-a-owner” schemes, where equity licensees are used to meet program requirements but hold no real control or long-term stake in the business. These practices dilute the intent of equity programs and can result in legal and reputational harm. Strong safeguards and vetting procedures are needed to ensure ownership is authentic, meaningful, and beneficial to the equity applicant.

6. Stakeholder Engagement and Education are Crucial to Program Success Broad-based outreach and public education are essential for fostering participation and reducing stigma associated with cannabis and the cannabis industry. Many residents, particularly in historically over-policed communities, may distrust government processes or be unaware of available opportunities. Others may still view cannabis through a criminal lens. Proactive communication strategies, especially those that engage trusted messengers, can build trust, encourage participation, and foster a more inclusive local cannabis economy.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1244 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

7. Past Convictions Have Long-Term Consequences
Despite statewide reforms, many individuals continue to experience the collateral consequences of cannabis-related convictions, including barriers to employment, housing, and financial aid.

While AB 1793 (Bonta, 2018) mandated automatic record sealing for eligible convictions, implementation gaps remain. The City should explore ways to partner with legal aid providers, the District Attorney’s Office, and community groups to ensure that individuals are aware of and can access expungement services.

8. Lack of Workforce Development Limits Equitable Participation Many disproportionately impacted individuals lack access to industry-specific training programs that could prepare them for success in the legal cannabis market. This shortage of educational and workforce development opportunities limits their ability to secure living-wage jobs or pursue entrepreneurial pathways. Expanding access to vocational training, mentorship, and apprenticeship programs is key to building a sustainable equity-centered cannabis workforce.

9. Sustainable Program Funding Is Critical to Success and Long-Term Effectiveness of the Program
Long-term success of the Cannabis Equity Program depends on sustained investment. Cities across California have struggled to operate equity programs due to inconsistent funding and inadequate staffing. Without sufficient resources, support services such as technical assistance, outreach, legal aid, and financial assistance cannot be delivered at the scale needed. The City should explore diverse funding streams including cannabis tax revenues, state grants, and philanthropic partnerships, to ensure the program’s viability.

10.Community Reinvestment is Key to Providing Communitywide Equity Program Benefits
Cannabis legalization presents a unique opportunity to reinvest in communities harmed by prohibition. By dedicating a portion of cannabis-related revenues to community-driven initiatives ( e.g. youth programming, job training, and reentry services) the City can begin to repair the harms of past enforcement while fostering economic resilience. Reinvestment strategies should be guided by input from impacted communities and aligned with broader equity goals.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1245 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

11.Ongoing Data Collection and Program Evaluation Are Essential to Program Success
Effective implementation requires robust data collection and evaluation. Monitoring key performance indicators (e.g. licensing outcomes, ownership patterns, employment statistics, and service utilization) will help the City track progress, identify gaps, and make informed adjustments. Transparency and accountability are essential to maintaining community trust and ensuring that the program evolves to meet changing needs.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1246 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

7. Potential Equity Program Elements
The following potential equity program elements provide a full menu of possibilities for Santa Monica’s equity program. The elements are grouped by themes to address the challenges and opportunities identified in this Equity Assessment. These program elements are designed to promote equitable access, protect equity participants, and build a sustainable and communitycentered cannabis program in Santa Monica.

Licensing Structure and Market Access
To prevent market conditions that undermine the goals of the equity program, the City could adopt a phased and controlled licensing approach that ensures equity applicants are given early, meaningful, and prioritized access to the regulated market.

Limit on Licenses with Equity Set-Asides
 Establish zoning parameters that naturally limit the number of retail licenses to prevent oversaturation.
 Reserve a specific number of retail licenses exclusively for equity applicants during the early phases of licensing and maintain priority access in future licensing phases.

Phased Market Entry
 Implement a staggered rollout of licenses, granting equity applicants a head start (e.g., 12–24 months) before opening the process to general applicants.  Use the early phase to provide technical assistance, funding, and permitting support to equity businesses to help them establish and stabilize.

Ongoing Market Impact Monitoring
 Create a system for monitoring market conditions, including equity applicant participation, market saturation levels, and business viability to inform future licensing decisions and program policies as needed.

Application and Permitting Process
To reduce bureaucratic and financial hurdles, the City should design a simplified, supportive permitting system for equity applicants:

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1247 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Streamlined Licensing Process
 Offer priority processing and expedited review for equity applicants with a dedicated staff member or cannabis department.
 Waive or defer application and license fees for qualified equity applicants.

Provisional Approval
 Allow provisional approval of licenses before securing a business location to help equity applicants attract investors and secure financing.
 Provide a time-limited window for provisional permit holders to finalize site selection and obtain full approval.

Workshops or Guidance
 Host permitting and compliance workshops to help applicants navigate the permitting process confidently and efficiently.

Equity Program Support Services
The City could implement comprehensive support services to remove entry barriers and promote equity applicant success. These services should address financial, administrative, business, and legal challenges through direct assistance and strategic partnerships.

Financial
 Cover training and certification fees to help applicants meet industry requirements.  Establish a loan or grant program to assist with start-up capital and ongoing business expenses.

Administrative
 Offer cannabis regulatory compliance training to ensure businesses meet local and state requirements.
 Establish pro bono legal assistance programs for business structuring, contracts, and compliance.

Business
 Creation of training curriculum or partnership with local academic institutions or businesses.
 General business development training.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1248 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

 Cannabis-specific business development training.
 Cannabis employment training.
 Apprenticeship/mentorship programs.

Legal
 Provide resources for expungement services to assist those with past cannabis convictions to get their records.
 Collaborate with legal aid organizations for workshops and case assistance.

Preventing Predatory Practices
Equity applicants are vulnerable to exploitative partnerships. The City could adopt safeguards to protect their ownership, autonomy, and financial interests:

Ownership Transparency
 Require disclosure of ownership and profit-sharing agreements during licensing.

Contract Review & Legal Support
 Implement a formal review process for equity ownership and investor contracts.  Provide standard templates for operating agreements and investment deals, including:
o Minimum ownership thresholds.
o Decision-making power.
o Buyout rights and succession.
o Management restrictions.
o Profit sharing.

Investor Vetting
 Develop a list or platform for pre-vetted, equity-aligned investors and partners.

Outreach and Education
The City should consider developing and implementing a comprehensive outreach and education strategy focused on raising awareness, restoring trust, and reducing stigma. Strategies to achieve these goals include:

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1249 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Community Outreach and Education
 Host public meetings, workshops, and listening sessions to provide information about the cannabis equity program and address community concerns.  Engage directly with impacted communities through local events, neighborhood organizations, and town halls.
 Develop culturally competent educational materials tailored to different communities, including multilingual resources.
 Utilize various media outlets to address misconceptions about cannabis businesses and expand outreach efforts to communicate the objectives of the equity program.

Partnerships and Collaborations
 Work with community-based organizations, advocacy groups, and business networks to enhance outreach efforts and build trust.
 Partner with legal aid groups, workforce development programs, and small business support organizations to provide direct services to equity applicants.  Involve trusted community leaders and influencers in outreach efforts to improve credibility and engagement.
 Connect individuals with expungement services at the District Attorney’s and Public Defender’s offices.

Social Media and Digital Outreach
 Provide real-time updates and program information on the cannabis website and social media channels.
 Create educational videos, infographics, and testimonials from equity applicants to highlight success stories and promote participation.
 Use targeted digital advertising to reach impacted communities and spread awareness of available resources.

Workforce Development and Employment Inclusion
To create long-term economic mobility for impacted individuals, the City could support job readiness and hiring pipelines within the cannabis industry:

Equitable Hiring
 Require licensed cannabis businesses to hire a designated percentage of employees from equity-eligible populations to promote economic inclusion.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1250 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

 Offer tax reductions, fee waivers, or other financial incentives to cannabis businesses that meet or exceed equity hiring benchmarks (i.e. 25% to 50% of workforce).

Creation of a Cannabis Training Program
 Develop a city-supported training initiative focused on cannabis cultivation, retail management, compliance, distribution, and manufacturing.

Partnerships to Leverage Available Resources
 Collaborate with colleges, workforce development organizations, and industry leaders to provide specialized entrepreneurship and job training programs.  Integrate business development training to help equity applicants navigate licensing, financial management, and operations.
 Connect equity applicants with statewide and national cannabis workforce training programs to maximize available resources and opportunities.

Community Reinvestment
The reinvestment of cannabis tax revenues back into the most affected neighborhoods could help address the impacts of cannabis criminalization for whole communities:

Targeted Investments
 Fund education, job training, legal aid, and housing support in impacted areas.  Provide resources for reentry programs and public health services.

Equity-Focused Business Ecosystem
 Support collaboration between cannabis equity applicants and ancillary businesses (e.g., construction, marketing, security, technology) that meet equity eligibility criteria, ensuring reinvestment stays within impacted communities.  Require or incentivize cannabis retail businesses to sell cannabis products from licensed cannabis equity businesses.
 Establish a Cannabis Equity Business Directory to connect equity cannabis operators with local, minority-owned ancillary service providers.

Sustainable Community Reinvestment through Cannabis Tax Revenue:
 Dedicate a percentage of local cannabis tax revenue specifically for community reinvestment in disproportionately impacted areas.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1251 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

 Establish a Community Reinvestment Fund to finance long-term social equity initiatives and economic empowerment programs.

Equity Program Funding Strategy
To ensure consistent and ongoing funding for the Cannabis Equity Program, the City could pursue a multi-source funding strategy that combines state grants, local tax revenue, and alternative funding streams.

Leverage State Grant Opportunities
 Continue applying for funding through the GO-Biz Cannabis Equity Grants Program for Local Jurisdictions, which offers up to $3,000,000 in Type 2 grants for program administration and equity applicant support.
 Ensure compliance with grant requirements, including the 1:1 matching funds contribution for awards exceeding $500,000 and restrictions on administrative and technical assistance allocations.
 Explore other state and federal grant opportunities that support economic development and social equity initiatives.

Establish a Dedicated Cannabis Tax Fund
 Allocate a portion of local cannabis tax revenue to sustain the equity program, reducing reliance on external grants.
 Structure tax allocations to cover equity applicant grants, fee waivers, workforce development programs, and technical assistance.

Explore Alternative Funding Sources
 Partner with private investors, social impact funds, and philanthropic organizations to create a community reinvestment fund that supports equity businesses.  Explore public-private partnerships to fund technical assistance, job training, and business development programs.

Ongoing Evaluation and Transparency
Consider active monitoring and data collection of the equity program to gain insights into its performance, identify areas that may need improvement or adjustment, and make informed decisions to enhance the program's overall effectiveness. Continue to monitor and update the equity program:

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1252 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

 Monitor and share progress of the Equity Program;
 Monitor and share trends in the emerging legal cannabis industry;  Identify areas for course correction and/or unexpected consequences; and  Demonstrate an ongoing commitment to data-informed decision-making and strategic planning.

The following data metrics can be incorporated into the application, permitting, and permit renewal process:
 Types of drug-related offenses
 Demographic information
 Income status
 Race
 Ethnicity
 Gender
 Sexual identity
 Residency status
Ownership structure
 Workforce characteristics:
o Total number of employees
o Number of local employees
o Total number of equity employees
o Employment Status
 Equity program-specific data:
o Number of equity applicants to apply
o Number and types of services provided to equity applicants o Number of equity program applicants to receive licenses o Amount of grant funding provided to equity applicants

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1253 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

8. Recommendations for Santa Monica’s Equity Program
City Council has expressed interest in implementing a focused and equitable program that balances access, oversight, and community benefit. These Santa Monica-specific recommendations respond directly to the City’s scale, market conditions, and resources while aligning with the broader goals of social equity, community reinvestment, and local economic inclusion. The goal is to create a lean, high-impact equity program that delivers meaningful benefits to those disproportionately affected by cannabis enforcement while remaining practical and sustainable.

As a relatively small city of only 8.5 square miles, Santa Monica faces different constraints and opportunities than larger cities like Los Angeles, Oakland, or Long Beach. While many cannabis equity policy frameworks draw from statewide best practices and lessons from other jurisdictions, it may be necessary for Santa Monica to implement a more tailored approach to cannabis equity.

Equity Program Eligibility Criteria
It is recommended that the City adopt clear eligibility standards based on cannabis-related conviction history, low-income status, and Santa Monica residency (current or former), as these qualifiers aim to address those who have been historically shown to be the most impacted as described earlier in the report.

Recommendation: Conviction History
Prioritize individuals who have been arrested or convicted for cannabis-related offenses.  Minimum eligibility should include individuals with a past cannabis-related arrest or conviction.

Options to expand eligibility:
 Expand eligibility beyond Santa Monica to include arrests or convictions anywhere within California to reflect the broad impact of criminalization.  Include immediate family members (parents, siblings, children, or spouses) of individuals with cannabis-related arrests or convictions, recognizing the intergenerational consequences of cannabis enforcement.

Rationale:

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1254 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Research confirms that Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino communities have been disproportionately criminalized. Restricting eligibility to Santa Monica arrests would exclude many individuals who were impacted but later moved due to displacement, gentrification, or economic hardship. Including family members helps the program reach those indirectly affected.

Recommendation: Low-Income Status
Require applicants to meet a clearly defined low-income threshold to ensure resources benefit those most in need.
 Set eligibility at or below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI).

Rationale:

Establishing clear financial criteria prevents the program from being exploited by individuals who do not face significant economic barriers. A well-defined low-income threshold ensures resources are allocated to those who need them most. A threshold of 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) is a standard used by other cannabis equity programs across the state.

Recommendation: Residency Consideration
Ensure the program benefits both current and former Santa Monica residents who have been impacted by cannabis enforcement and the War on Drugs.
 Residency requirements should consider both current and former Santa Monica residents who lived in disproportionately affected areas.  Residency should be measured cumulatively rather than consecutive years, to avoid penalizing those displaced due to gentrification or economic instability.  Possible residency thresholds:
o Minimum of five years – cumulative or consecutive (Long Beach Model) o Five consecutive years (Sacramento Model)
o Cumulative of ten years (Oakland Model)
 Options to expand eligibility:
o Expand eligibility to those who currently or previously attended school in Santa Monica.
o Expand eligibility to those who currently or previously owned a business in Santa Monica.

Rationale:

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1255 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Prioritizing applicants who have lived in the most impacted neighborhoods (Figure 12 ‘Disadvantaged Census Tracts’) may increase the program’s effectiveness. A lack of this requirement may not ensure people of color and/or less than a high school education are benefitting from the program.

Recommendation: Ownership Consideration
Implement an equity ownership percentage threshold that balances protecting equity applicants while maintaining investment flexibility.
 Recommend requiring an equity ownership range between 40% to51%, with the equity applicant always maintaining majority share ownership which allows flexibility while ensuring equity applicants maintain decision-making power.  Option to expand support services:
o Programs to help equity applicants navigate ownership agreements and avoid predatory partnerships.

Rationale:

Setting ownership at 40% to51% ensures equity applicants benefit from the program while allowing flexibility in investment structures. Many California equity programs require at least 51% equity ownership to ensure that social equity partnerships retain control over their businesses and are not exploited by outside investors. However, requiring a strict 51% threshold may also discourage or limit opportunity for outside investors who provide essential funding. Legal assistance will protect applicants from predatory investors seeking to take advantage of the program.

Core Program Elements and Services
These are the minimum essential program elements and services the City should implement immediately. They focus on lowering barriers to entry for equity applicants while keeping having a streamlined and efficient administrative process.

Controlled Market Entry
 Implement a phased licensing timeline that provides equity applicants with early access (e.g., 12–24 months) to establish themselves before general licenses are issued.  Implementation Consideration:
 A phased licensing approach will have an impact on the timeline to get the first round of businesses permitted and is dependent on the length of time established for early access. Additionally, as permits will be limited based on zoning constraints, early access for equity applicants may encourage predatory partnerships.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1256 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Financial
 Offer application and permit fee waivers or deferrals for qualified equity applicants.  Implementation Consideration:
 Offering application and/or permit fee waivers has financial implications that could result in loss of revenue to the City.

Application and Licensing
 Provide equity applicants with expedited application processing and review.  Host one or two workshops, either led by the City or a partner organization, to walk applicants through requirements, process, and timelines.  Allow provisional approval of licenses before securing a business location to help equity applicants attract investors and secure financing, with a time-limited window to finalize site selection and obtain full approval.
 Access to a digital resource hub with templates, checklists, and FAQs.  Require disclosure of ownership and profit-sharing agreements during licensing.

Administrative, Legal, and Technical Assistance
 Connect equity applicants with existing business development and cannabis industry resources.
 Refer equity applicants to pre-vetted legal aid groups and small business assistance providers, and workforce development organizations to administer direct services to equity applicants.
 Collaborate with the County District Attorney’s Office and Public Defender for expungement workshops.

Outreach and Program Information
 Continue to update and utilize the City’s cannabis equity webpage on the City’s website to provide clear program information online in multiple languages.  Targeted outreach to historically impacted communities using digital platforms, flyers, and community-based partnerships.

Employment and Product Inclusion
 Require licensed cannabis businesses to hire a designated percentage of employees from equity-eligible populations to promote economic inclusion.  Offer incentives to cannabis businesses that meet or exceed equity hiring benchmarks (i.e. 25% to 50% workforce).

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1257 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

 Require or incentivize cannabis retail businesses to sell cannabis products from licensed cannabis equity businesses.

Program Monitoring and Evaluation
 Conduct annual program evaluations that monitor and share progress of the Equity Program.
 Monitor emerging legal cannabis industry trends and course correct as needed.  Monitor customer satisfaction and emerging needs with the equity program through surveys.

Community Reinvestment
 Dedicate a percentage of local cannabis tax revenue specifically for community reinvestment in disproportionally impacted areas.
 Establish a Community Reinvestment Fund to finance long-term social equity initiatives and economic empowerment programs.
 Explore other state and federal grant opportunities that support economic development and social equity initiatives.

Expanded Services with State Grant Funding
Subject the availability of State funding, if the City receives Type 2 funding from the California Cannabis Equity Grants Program for Local Jurisdictions administered by GO-Biz, the City could significantly expand its equity program beyond baseline services above. Under current grant program guidelines, the City may apply for up to $500,000 in grant funds without providing a local one-to-one funding match.

Up to 10% of the grant may be used for city administrative costs and an additional 10% may be allocated to consultant services, such as providing technical assistance or grant support. The remaining 80% must be distributed directly to equity applicants in the form of grants or other eligible direct financial assistance. The following are potential program enhancements that may be feasible with this funding.

Direct Financial Assistance
 Start-up Grants or Fee Waivers: Provide micro-grants ($5,000–$25,000 range) to equity applicants to cover local or state licensing fees, professional services, or first-year operating expenses.
 Lease Assistance or Rent Subsidies: Offer limited-term subsidies to help equity applicants secure compliant locations in Santa Monica.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1258 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Expanded Legal and Technical Support
 One-on-One Professional Services Vouchers: Offer subsidized access to vetted legal, financial, and technical consultants (e.g., for corporate formation, tax planning, or security planning).
 Compliance Readiness Checks: Fund pre-inspection walkthroughs to help applicants meet local code and Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) requirements before final inspections.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1259 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Appendix A: Cannabis Equity Assessment Survey (English)

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1260 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1261 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1262 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1263 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1264 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1265 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1266 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1267 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1268 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1269 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1270 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1271 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1272 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1273 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1274 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1275 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1276 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1277 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1278 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1279 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1280 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1281 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1282 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1283 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1284 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

Appendix B: Cannabis Equity Assessment Survey (Spanish)

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1285 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1286 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1287 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1288 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1289 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1290 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1291 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1292 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1293 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1294 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1295 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1296 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1297 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1298 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1299 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Assessment
July 2025

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1300 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance)

EXHIBIT B

CANNABIS EQUITY PROGRAM MANUAL

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1301 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Program September 2025
DRAFT Cannabis Equity Program
Table of Contents

1. Program Purpose

2. Definitions

3. Program Eligibility

4. Program Benefits and Services

5. Program Administration, Monitoring and Evaluation

1. Program Purpose
The Cannabis Equity Program (“Program”) seeks to reduce the barriers of entry and participation for individuals that have been negatively impacted by the disproportionate enforcement of cannabis related crimes by providing them access into the legal cannabis industry. The Program aims to recognize and address the ongoing negative social impact associated with the disproportionate enforcement of cannabis policies on Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) and low-income communities in the City. Long-term impacts from the criminalization of cannabis include social stigma of criminal conviction and incarceration, family and community disintegration, permanent loss of property, disqualification from employment opportunities, reduced earnings potential, exclusion from public benefits, and inability to vote in public elections.

As a relatively small city of only 8.5 square miles, Santa Monica faces different constraints and opportunities than larger cities like Los Angeles, Oakland, or Long Beach. While many cannabis equity policy frameworks draw from statewide best practices and lessons from other jurisdictions, it was appropriate for Santa Monica to implement a more tailored approach to cannabis equity.

At the direction of City Council, this Program implements a focused and equitable program that balances access, oversight, and community benefit. The program elements respond directly to the City’s scale, market conditions, and resources while aligning with the broader goals of social equity, community reinvestment, and local economic inclusion. The overarching goal is to create a lean, high-impact equity program that delivers meaningful benefits to those disproportionately affected by cannabis enforcement while remaining practical and sustainable.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1302 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) 2 City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Program September 2025

2. Definitions
Except for as provided herein, for purposes of the Program, the words and phrases defined in Chapter 6.200 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code shall have the same meaning herein.

Further, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section:
a) “Applicant” means an individual or business who makes a formal application to be admitted in the Program.
b) "Business" means a firm, organization, association, partnership, business trust, corporation, company, or like entity.
c) "Cannabis Equity Program" or ''the Program" means the City of Santa Monica Cannabis Equity Program.
d) "Program participant" or "participant" means an individual or a business that has been accepted into the Program.
e) "Immediate family member" means an individual who had a parent, legal guardian, child, spouse, or dependent, or was a dependent of an individual who was arrested for, convicted of, or adjudged to be a ward of the juvenile court for any non-violent crime under the laws of California or any jurisdiction relating to the sale, possession, use, cultivation, manufacture, or transport of cannabis. f) "Individual" means a person.
g) "Low-income individual" means an individual who currently (at the time of licensing) lives in a household with a household income that is at or below 80 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI) for the county of residence, as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development or its successor agency, and net worth below $250,000.

3. Program Eligibility for Equity Applicants
The City’s eligibility standards are based on cannabis-related conviction history, low-income status, and Santa Monica residency (current or former), as these qualifiers aim to address those who have been historically shown to be the most impacted as described in Santa Monica’s Cannabis Equity Assessment (July 2025).
a. Conviction History. Prioritize individuals who have been or have immediate family members who have been arrested or convicted for cannabis-related offenses:
 Individuals with a past cannabis-related arrest or conviction in compliance with Article 6 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1303 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) 3 City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Program September 2025
 Immediate family members (as defined herein) of individuals with cannabisrelated arrests or convictions, recognizing the intergenerational consequences of cannabis enforcement.

Rationale:

The Equity Assessment data from 1993-2023 confirms that Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino communities have been disproportionately criminalized.

Restricting eligibility to Santa Monica arrests would exclude many individuals who were impacted but later moved due to displacement, gentrification, or economic hardship. Including immediate family members helps the program reach those indirectly affected.
b. Low-Income Status. Require applicants to meet a clearly defined low-income threshold to ensure resources benefit those most in need.
 Set eligibility at or below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI).

Rationale:

Establishing clear financial criteria prevents the program from being exploited by individuals who do not face significant economic barriers. A well-defined low-income threshold ensuresresources are allocated to those who need themmost. A threshold of 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) is a standard used by other cannabis equity programs across the state.
c. Community Ties. Ensure the program benefits both current and former Santa Monica residents, students, and business owners who have been impacted by cannabis enforcement and the War on Drugs.
 Cumulative of three non-overlapping years in any of the following:
o Those who currently or previously resided in Santa Monica; or o Those who currently or previously attended school in Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District; or
o Those who currently or previously owned a business in Santa Monica.

Rationale:

Prioritizing applicants who have lived in the most impacted neighborhoods (Figure 12 ‘Disadvantaged Census Tracts’) may limit the program’s effectiveness and reach.

Requirements should consider both current and former Santa Monica residents who lived in disproportionately affected areas and should be measured cumulatively rather than consecutively to avoid penalizing those displaced due to gentrification or

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1304 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) 4 City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Program September 2025
economic instability. Focusing on individuals who attended K-12 schools in Santa Monica is more likely to reflect longer-term residency and stronger community connections. By contrast, Santa Monica College students often represent a more transient population, many of whom reside in other cities during or after their enrollment, which may not align as closely with the program’s intent of addressing local impacts.
d. Ownership. Require equity ownership majority that balances protecting equity applicants while maintaining investment flexibility.
 Require an equity ownership to have majority share which allows flexibility while ensuring equity applicants maintain decision-making power.

Rationale:

Setting a majority ownership requirement ensures equity applicants benefit from the program while allowing flexibility in investment structures. Many California equity programs require at least 51% equity ownership to ensure that social equity partnerships retain control over their businesses and are not exploited by outside investors. However, requiring a strict 51% threshold may also discourage or limit opportunity for outside investors who provide essential funding. Legal assistance will protect applicants from predatory investors seeking to take advantage of the program.

The equity applicant will need to sign documentation attesting that they meet the above equity program eligibility criteria.

4. Program Benefits and Services
A Program participant shall be entitled to receive the following benefits and services:
a. Core Program Elements and Services. These are the minimum essential program elements and services the City should implement immediately. They focus on lowering barriers to entry for equity applicants while having a streamlined and efficient administrative process.
• Financial:
o Application and permit fee waivers or deferrals for qualified equity applicants.
• Application and Licensing:
o Provide equity applicants with expedited application processing and review.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1305 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) 5 City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Program September 2025
o Exemption from minimum distance requirement from other cannabis uses and limits to number of cannabis uses per block.
o Allow provisional approval of licenses before securing a business location to help equity applicants attract investors and secure financing, with a time-limited window to finalize site selection and obtain full approval. o Require disclosure of ownership and profit-sharing agreements during licensing to ensure equity applicants are protected.
• Administrative, Legal, and Technical Assistance:
o Connect equity applicants with existing business development and cannabis industry resources.
o Refer equity applicants to pre-vetted legal aid groups and small business assistance providers, and workforce development organizations to administer direct services to equity applicants.
o Collaborate with the County District Attorney’s Office and Public Defender for expungement workshops.
• Outreach and Program Information:
o Continue to update and utilize the City’s cannabis equity webpage on the City’s website to provide clear program information online in multiple languages.
o Work with City’s DEI Office to market the Equity Program. o Targeted outreach to historically impacted communities using digital platforms, flyers, and community-based partnerships.
b. Expanded Program Services with State Grant Funding. Subject to the availability of State funding, if the City receives Type 2 funding from the California Cannabis Equity Grants Program for Local Jurisdictions administered by GO-Biz, the City could significantly expand its equity program beyond baseline services above. Under current grant program guidelines, which are subject to change,theCitymay apply for up to $500,000 in grantfunds without providing a local one-to-one funding match.

Up to 10% of the grant may be used for city administrative costs and an additional 10% may be allocated to consultant services, such as providing technical assistance or grant support. The remaining 80% must be distributed directly to equity applicants in the form of grants or other eligible direct financial assistance. The following are potential program enhancements that may be feasible with this funding.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1306 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) 6 City of Santa Monica
Cannabis Equity Program September 2025
• Direct Financial Assistance:
o Start-up Grants or Fee Waivers: Provide micro-grants ($5,000–$25,000 range) to equity applicants to cover local or state licensing fees, professional services, or first-year operating expenses.
o Lease Assistance or Rent Subsidies: Offer limited-term subsidies to help equity applicants secure compliant locations in Santa Monica. • Expanded Legal and Technical Support:
o One-on-One Professional Services Vouchers: Offer subsidized access to vetted legal, financial, and technical consultants (e.g., for corporate formation, tax planning, or security planning).
o Compliance Readiness Checks: Fund pre-inspection
walkthroughs to help applicants meet local code and
Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) requirements before final inspections.

5. Program Administration, Monitoring and Evaluation
The Program will be executed administratively in compliance with the administrative guidelines in Article 6 of the municipal code.

The City will evaluate, monitor and share progress of the Program, including number of participants and participant success, measured by the number of participants either ready to obtain or that have obtained a cannabis business operating permit. The City may expand the eligibility and benefits of the program. The evaluation of the Program should include any ongoing barriers to entry and participation, evaluations of the Equity Study, and recommended solutions as needed to advance equity.

12.A.c
Packet Pg. 1307 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Equity Assessment and Program (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) 1 City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025 Santa Monica, California RESOLUTION NUMBER _________ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA ESTABLISHING A NON-CITY-BASED CANNABIS

DELIVERY PERMIT FEE AND RENAMING CERTAIN MEDICINAL CANNABIS

RETAILER FEES AS CANNABIS RETAILER PERMIT FEES
WHEREAS, the City Council may establish fees to recover the costs for providing City services, including reviewing applications and issuing permits; and WHEREAS, the City currently charges several Medicinal Cannabis Retailer fees as part of the application process, which includes conducting certain inspections; and WHEREAS, the City intends to perform the same inspections as part of the application process for commercial cannabis businesses; and WHEREAS, the City desires to rename the Medicinal Cannabis Retailer fees to be the Cannabis Retailer Permit Fee; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 6.200 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code requires commercial cannabis businesses that deliver cannabis and cannabis products to customers in the City of Santa Monica (“City”) to obtain, among other things, a Santa Monica business license and a Non-City-Based Cannabis Delivery Permit; and WHEREAS, reviewing applications for Non-City-Based Cannabis Delivery Permits involves, among other things, City staff time to: review insurance information, verify retail cannabis and other licenses from the State, verify retail cannabis licenses from the local jurisdiction of the cannabis delivery businesses that are not located in the City, and review other required documentation; and

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 1308 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Retailer Permit Fees (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) 2 WHEREAS, the City’s general cost recovery policy is to charge for the full cost of providing services to the public; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that cost of processing Non-City-Based Cannabis Delivery Permits is $65.74; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the proposed Non-City-Based Cannabis Delivery Permit fee does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service and is consistent with the City’s full cost recovery policy.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The following Medicinal Cannabis Retailer fees are being renamed:

Description Fee
Medicinal Cannabis Retailer- New: July-September (4 inspections) $1,991.84 Medicinal Cannabis Retailer- New: October- December (3 inspections) $1,523.09 Medicinal Cannabis Retailer- New: January-March (2 inspections) $1,054.33 Medicinal Cannabis Retailer- New: April-June (1 Inspection) $585.58 Medicinal Cannabis Retailer- Renewal $1,991.84
The renamed fees are shown below:

Description Fee
Cannabis Retailer Permit- New: July-September (4 inspections) $1,991.84 Cannabis Retailer Permit- New: October- December (3 inspections) $1,523.09 Cannabis Retailer Permit- New: January-March (2 inspections) $1,054.33 Cannabis Retailer Permit- New: April-June (1 Inspection) $585.58 Cannabis Retailer Permit- Renewal $1,991.84
SECTION 2.The City Council establishes a Non-City-Based Cannabis Delivery Permit fee of $65.74.

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 1309 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Retailer Permit Fees (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) 3 SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Heidi von Tongeln
Interim City Attorney

12.A.d
Packet Pg. 1310 Attachment: Resolution - Cannabis Retailer Permit Fees (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Adult-Use Cannabis
City Council
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1311 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Purpose
Create new Adult-Use Cannabis program
• Allows cannabis retailers in non-residential zones with some locational restrictions
Incorporate social equity component
• Review of cannabis equity assessment
• Core social equity program augmented with potential options for future consideration
• Cannabis retailer employing best practices hiring from equity eligible operations
• Cannabis retailers carrying products from equity applicants • Reinvestment into entrepreneurship programs
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1312 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Previous Council Direction
• Permit legal adult-use cannabis uses of all types in all nonresidential zones with locational buffers • 600’ from sensitive uses (schools, daycare facilities, youth centers) • 300’ between other cannabis uses
• No more than one cannabis use per block
• Pursue a standard equity program that would prioritize individuals who qualify for the equity program and not
require additional staffing
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1313 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Cannabis Background
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1314 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Background
• 2015 - Council authorized 2 medicinal cannabis retailers • 2017 – SMMC Article 6 commercial cannabis regulations and definitions adopted
• 2021/2022 – Conditional Use Permits approved for 2 medicinal retailers
• 2022 (November) – Measure HMP approved by voters
establishing cannabis tax
• 2023
• June - City Council Study Session on allowing adult-use cannabis • November - IZO permitting medicinal retailers to sell adult-use cannabis
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1315 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Background
• 2024
• January - Award of $40,000 State grant for equity assessment • April - City Council Study Session on equity and locational requirements
• September – Planning Commission Study Session on equity and locational requirements
• 2025
• March – Award of $35,000 State grant for development of cannabis equity program
• June – Planning Commission recommendation of Zoning Ordinance amendments
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1316 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Adult-Use Cannabis as a Permitted Land Use
Licensed Commercial Cannabis Retailers in the Santa Monica Area (2025) Two medicinal cannabis
retailers permitted to sell
adult-use cannabis
products:
• 925 Wilshire Blvd
(Local)
• 1418 Wilshire Blvd
(Harvest)
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1317 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Proposed
Text Amendments
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1318 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments
• Delete Medicinal Cannabis Section (SMMC 9.31.185)
• Add new Cannabis Retailers Section (SMMC 9.31.095) • Locational requirements: • 600’ from sensitive uses • 300’ between cannabis uses • No more than one cannabis business per block • Allow cannabis retail in all non-residential zoning districts • Downtown Districts • Mixed-Use and Commercial Districts • Bergamot Districts • Employment Districts • Oceanfront District • Add as an Active Use [SMMC 9.11.030(A)(1)]
• Amend land use classification for Cannabis Retailer [SMMC 9.51.030(B)] Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1319 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments
Potential issues with locational requirements: • 300’ between cannabis uses • No more than one cannabis business per block • Creates uncertainty for cannabis retailer applicants and staff • Opens City to litigation risks
• Potentially delays implementation of cannabis program Policy Question:

In order to simplify the cannabis permit process, should the 300’ buffer requirement between cannabis uses and maximum of one cannabis use per block be removed?
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1320 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Planning Commission Recommendation
• June 4, 2025 – Planning Commission adopted Resolution recommending Council adopt Ordinance amending Article 9 to authorize cannabis retailers
• Suggested a broader equity program and elements that
would benefit non-cannabis-related local businesses
• Equity program should not result in processes and
barriers that delay commencement of cannabis program
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1321 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Revise SMMC Chapter 6.200
• Application and permit process
• Addition of Cannabis Delivery Permit
• Restrictions on transfers, changes, or alterations
• Annual renewal and compliance
• City oversight and enforcement
• Indemnification agreement
Delete SMMC Chapters 6.201-6.203
Proposed Article 6 Text Amendments
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1322 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Retailer
Permitting
Process w/
Buffer Req.

Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1323 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Retailer
Permitting
Process w/out
Buffer Req.

Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1324 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Cannabis Permit Fees
• Cannabis Retailer Permit: $1,991.84
• Plus: Cannabis tax, State fee, Business license review, and processing fees
• Maintains current retailer permit fee to allow more informed assessment of time and costs required
• Non-City-Based Cannabis Delivery Retailer Permit: $65.74 • Plus: Cannabis tax, State fee, Business license processing fee Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1325 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Cannabis Social Equity
Assessment and
Program
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1326 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) What is Cannabis Social Equity?
• Recognize the long-term and
disproportionate impacts of the
criminalization of cannabis upon
minority communities
• Promote equitable ownership and
employment opportunities in the
cannabis industry
• Decrease disparities and improve
outcome among identified groups
that have been most affected by
the war on drugs
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1327 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Development of Cannabis Equity Program
Analyzed
Quantitative
and
Qualitative
Data to
Determine
Most
Impacted
Groups
Equity
Assessment
Informs
Eligibility
Criteria and
Program
Components
Assessment
Findings
Adopt and
Implement
the Equity
Program
Equity
Program
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1328 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Equity Assessment Analysis
Qualitative Data:

Community outreach and stakeholder interview to understand community- and personallevel impacts of cannabis criminalization, including: • Two (2) Community Workshops • Online Survey with 170 Responses • Nine (9) Community Stakeholder One-on-One Interviews • Seven (7) Community-Led Discussions through Micro-Grant Program Quantitative Data:

Analysis of cannabis-related conviction and arrest data from 1993-2023 in conjunction with census tract demographic data to identify most impacted communities based on cannabis criminalization.

Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1329 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Equity Assessment Findings

1. Unrestricted Permitting and Licensing May Have Consequences

2. Program Eligibility Criteria Should Prioritize Those Most Harmed by Cannabis Enforcement

3. Application and Permitting Processes Present Barriers to Entry

4. Systemic Barriers Limit Access to the Regulated Marketplace

5. Equity Applicants are Vulnerable to Exploitative Partnerships

6. Stakeholder Engagement and Education are Crucial to Program Success

7. Past Convictions Have Long-Term Consequences

8. Lack of Workforce Development Limits Equitable Participation

9. Sustainable Program Funding is Critical to Success and Long-Term Effectiveness of the Program

10. Community Reinvestment is Key to Providing Communitywide Equity Program Benefits

11. Ongoing Data Collection and Program Evaluation are Essential to Program Success Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1330 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Proposed Cannabis Equity Program
Eligibility Criteria:
• Conviction History • Individuals who have been or have immediate family members who have been arrested or convicted for a cannabis-related offenses
• Low-Income Status • At or below 80% of Area Median Income (AMI) • Residency Consideration • Applicants should be current or previous residents, students, or business owners in Santa Monica, for at least three years, cumulatively
• Ownership Consideration • Requires ownership majority which allows flexibility while ensuring equity applicants maintain decision-making power
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1331 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Proposed Cannabis Equity Program
Core Program Elements and Services: • Financial • Application and permit fee waivers or deferrals • Application and Licensing • Expedited application processing and review • Exemption from minimum distance requirement from other cannabis uses and limits to number of cannabis uses per block • Provisional approval of licenses before securing business location, with time-limited window to finalize site selection and obtain full approval • Disclosure of ownership and profit-sharing agreements during license review • Administrative, Legal, and Technical Assistance • Connect with existing business development and cannabis industry resources • Refer to groups and assistance providers to administer direct services • Collaborate with the County DA’s Office and Public Defender for expungement workshops • Outreach and Program Information • Continue to update and utilize City’s cannabis equity webpage • Targeted outreach to historically impacted communities Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1332 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Expanded Equity Program Services
Expanded Program Services with Potential State Grant Funding:
• Direct Financial Assistance • Start-up grants or fee waivers ($5,000-$25,000) to equity applicants to cover licensing fees, professional services, or first-year operating expenses • Lease assistance or rent subsidies for a limited-term to help equity applicants secure compliant locations
• Expanded Legal and Technical Support • One-on-one professional services vouchers to subsidize access to vetted legal, financial, and technical consultants • Funding for compliance readiness checks pre-inspection walkthroughs to help applicants meet local and state requirements before final inspections Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1333 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Other Ways to Support Equity
Promoting Equity Across All Cannabis Businesses:
• Employment and Product Inclusion • Encourage cannabis businesses to employ best practices in hiring equity-eligible populations (conviction history, low-income status, community ties to eligibility criteria) to promote economic inclusion • Offer incentives to cannabis businesses that meet or exceed equity hiring benchmarks • Encourage cannabis retail businesses to sell cannabis products from licensed cannabis equity businesses
• Community Reinvestment (subject to future Council budget decisions) • Dedicate a percentage of local cannabis tax revenue specially for community reinvestment in disproportionally impacted areas • Establish a Community Reinvestment Fund to finance long-term social equity initiatives and economic empowerment programs • Explore other state and federal grant opportunities that support economic development and social equity initiatives
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1334 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Recommendation
• Adopt an Ordinance amending SMMC Article 6
• Adopt an Ordinance amending SMMC Article 9
(with possible removal of buffer between and per block requirement) • Authorize the City Manager to execute documents accepting the cannabis equity assessment
• Adopt a Resolution establishing a cannabis equity program • Adopt a Resolution establishing Cannabis Retailer Permit fees and Non-City-Based Cannabis Delivery Permit Fee
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1335 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Recommendation
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1336 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) Eligible Parcels
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025
Item 12-A
September 9, 2025

12.A.e
Packet Pg. 1337 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (6802 : Adult Use Cannabis Ordinance) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.A
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Appointment to three unscheduled vacancies for terms ending on June 30, 2026, and three unscheduled vacancies for terms ending on June 30, 2028 on the Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. Board
Prepared By: Esterlina Lugo, Deputy City Clerk
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Applicant List
B. Written Comments

16.A
Packet Pg. 1338
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Downtown Santa Monica, Inc.

Name Application Date
Badawy, Adam 07/25/2025
Besser, Sean 07/16/2025
Bloom, Richard 07/23/2025
Brown, Alexander 07/30/2025
Davis, Gleam O. 02/03/2025
Gielicz, Albin^ 07/30/2025
Gregory, Jonathan 07/24/2025
Jarow, Jeff 02/26/2025
Kruger, Judy 08/07/2025
Patterson, Hodge IV 07/27/2025
Polachek, Elaine M.^ 07/18/2025
Sullivan, Thomas 08/09/2025
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 12
^ Is a registered lobbyist

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 1339 Attachment: Applicant List [Revision 3] (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Laura Strazzo <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 1:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 16-A - 9/9/25 City Council Meeting Attachments: 2025.09.09 Ltr to City Council Re Agenda Item 16-A.pdf Importance: High

EXTERNAL
Hello,
Please see the attached public comment for tonight’s Santa Monica City Council meeting concerning Agenda Item 16-A.

Thank you,
Laura Strazzo
Partner
Patterson & O’Neill, PC
Office: (415) 907-9110
Direct: (415) 907-7723
Fax: (415) 907-7704
235 Montgomery Street, Ste 950
San Francisco, CA 94104
[email protected]
www.pattersononeill.com
This email may contain privileged or confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the original sender and delete all copies. Nothing in this email or any attachments should be regarded as tax advice unless expressly stated.

Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1340 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) PATTERSON & O’NEILL, PC
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 950
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 907-9110
Facsimile: (415) 907-7704
www.pattersononeill.com
September 9, 2025

VIA EMAIL
Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street,
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Email: [email protected]
Re: Agenda Item 16-A
Appointments to DTSM
Dear Mayor Negrete and Council Members,
Our office represents Jon Farzam and Leo Pustilnikov who were improperly removed, along with four other Council-appointed Directors, from the Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. (“DTSM”) in July. As you are aware, we have filed suit challenging the Santa Monica City Council’s removal of our clients. A copy of the lawsuit is enclosed. The City and City Council’s actions raise significant concerns, which we expect will be further uncovered through this litigation.

Please also be advised that if you move forward with appointing new Directors, any actions taken by them may be later invalidated by the court. Therefore, the most prudent course would be to reverse the Council’s decision to remove our clients and the other Board Directors, allow them to continue to serve out the remainder of their terms, and to proceed with any further removals in compliance with the DTSM’s bylaws. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
PATTERSON & O’NEILL, PC
Laura Strazzo, Esq.

Encls.
- Pustilnikov, et al. v. City of Santa Monica, et al. (258STCP03460) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1341 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Assigned for all purposes to: Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Judicial Officer: Curtis Kin 25STCP03460 Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1342 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1343 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1344 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1345 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1346 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1347 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1348 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1349 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1350 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1351 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
11 VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
PATTERSON & O'NEILL, PC 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 950 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104

VERIFICATION
I, Leonid Pustilnikov, declare as follows:

1. I am an individual and a resident of the State of California. I am a petitioner in this action. I am authorized to verify this VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF;
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF on behalf of myself.

2. I have read the foregoing VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF;
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF and know its contents. The matters stated in the VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF are true of my own knowledge from having reviewed the relevant records related to this VE IFIED PETITION.

I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on September 4, 2025. _______________________ Leonid Pustilnikov Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1352 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
12 VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
PATTERSON & O'NEILL, PC 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 950 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104

VERIFICATION
I, Jon Farzam, declare as follows:

3. I am an individual and a resident of the State of California. I am a petitioner in this action. I am authorized to verify this VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF;
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF on behalf of myself.

4. I have read the foregoing VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF;
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF and know its contents. The matters stated in the VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF are true of my own knowledge from having reviewed the relevant records related to this VE IFIED PETITION.

I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on September 4, 2025. _______________________ Jon Farzam Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1353 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
13 VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
PATTERSON & O'NEILL, PC 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 950 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104

EXHIBIT A
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1354 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1355 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1356 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1357 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1358 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1359 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1360 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1361 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1362 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1363 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1364 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1365 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1366 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
14 VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
PATTERSON & O'NEILL, PC 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 950 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104

EXHIBIT B
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1367 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Memo
To: Oliver Chi, City Manager
From: Barry Snell, City Councilmember
Cc: Caroline Torosis, Mayor Pro Tem
Dan Hall, City Councilmember
Date: July 25, 2025
Re: Governance Reforms and Emergency Appointments to the Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. (DTSM) Board of Directors
In coordination with Mayor Pro Tem Torosis and Councilmember Hall, we request that the full City Council consider taking immediate action to reform the governance of DTSM by approving the following actions:

1. Removing all six of the current City Council-appointed members to the DTSM Board of

2. Declaring that emergency circumstances exist under which the City Council may appoint acting board members, consistent with DTSM bylaws and State law, while also initiating the formal recruitment process to identify six permanent City Council appointments to the DTSM board.

3. Modifying current City Council practices, including a waiver of ranked-choice voting and Resolution No. 11510 procedures, to allow for the immediate appointment of six interim DTSM board members.

4. Directing that the City Clerk publish a notice of the board vacancies for DTSM and return to As we all know, DTSM plays a pivotal role in shaping the vitality, safety, and economic success of downtown Santa Monica. Unfortunately, members of the public and this City Council have he lack of transparency and accountability as it relates to the policy direction being provided by current Board of Directors.

Given the recent announcement of the resignation of current CEO Andrew Thomas, we believe that the governance issues that currently exist at DTSM can no longer be ignored. Accordingly, we are requesting that the City Council support our request to remove all six of the current City Council appointed board members to the DTSM Board
currently exists an emergency circumstance which requires the City Council to expedite the appointment process for six new board members to DTSM.

By taking these actions now, prior to the selection of a new CEO, the City Council can ensure that DTSM is better positioned to serve the public interest, respond to evolving downtown challenges, aligned City partner moving forward.

Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1368 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
15 VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
PATTERSON & O'NEILL, PC 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 950 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104

EXHIBIT C
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1369 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) DOWNTOWN SANTA MONICA, INC.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS EMERGENCY MEETING
Tuesday, July 29, 2025
4:00 PM
DTSM, Inc. Office
1351 Third Street Promenade, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90401
(Please note that agenda items may be reordered during the meeting at the discretion of the body.)

1. Call toOrder/Roll Call

2. AgendaItems - Allitems mayresultin Board Action
A. Board determination that an emergency exists pursuant to Gov. Code § 54956.5(a)(2), warranting the emergency meeting.

B.
governance and operations.

C. Consideration and vote on an amendment to Article 3, Section 4(c) of the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws.

3. Adjournment
DOWNTOWN SANTA MONICA, INC. OFFICES ARE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE.

Oral public comment from any one individual is limited to 6 minutes per meeting, with a maximum of 2 minutes per agenda item; under some circumstances, the board may change the maximum to 1 minute per agenda item.

Upon request, the agenda is available in alternative formats by calling DTSM, Inc. offices.

If you require any special disability accommodations, please contact the DTSM offices at least three days before the scheduled meeting. This agenda is subject to change up to 72 hours before a regular meeting and 24 hours before a special meeting. Please check the agenda before the meeting for changes. 1351 Third Street Promenade, Suite 201, Santa Monica, CA I 310.393.8355 I [email protected] Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1370 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
16 VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
PATTERSON & O'NEILL, PC 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 950 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104

EXHIBIT D
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1371 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) 6950514-v1
Alternate Form of Bylaw Amendment
Article 3, Section 4(a) of the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
(c) The Board may declare vacant the office of a Director who has been declared of unsound mind by a final order of court, or convicted of a felony, or found by a final order or judgment of any court to have breached any duty arising under Article 3 of the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law or who has failed to attend two (2) meetings out of any six (6) consecutive, regular meetings of the Board. A Director selected by the City Council and as determined by the vote of five (5)
(i) gross misconduct or willful malfeasance in the
or loyalty to the Corporation; (iii) a final conviction of a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude; (iv) repeated failure to attend Board meetings without good cause; or (v) any act or or that exposes the Corporation to substantial legal Any Director who the Council seeks to remove for cause shall be given notice from the City Council of the circumstances constituting cause and given 30 days to cure as well as the opportunity to address the City Council regarding the allegations of cause in a public hearing during this 30 days period.

A removed Director's successor may be elected immediately.

Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1372 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
17 VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION, OR OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
PATTERSON & O'NEILL, PC 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 950 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104

EXHIBIT E
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1373 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) City of Santa Monica
City Council Meeting
AGENDA

LANA NEGRETE
MAYOR

ELLIS RASKIN CAROLINE TOROSIS

COUNCILMEMBER MAYOR PRO TEM

DAN HALL BARRY SNELL

COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER

JESSE ZWICK NATALYA ZERNITSKAYA

COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER
OLIVER C. CHI

CITY MANAGER

DOUGLAS SLOAN

CITY ATTORNEY
NIKIMA S. NEWSOME

CITY CLERK

STANDARDS OF BEHAVIOR THAT PROMOTE CIVILITY AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS:

Treat everyone courteously; Embrace respectful disagreement and dissent as democratic rights, inherent components of an inclusive
public process, and tools for forging sound decisions
Hate has no place in Santa Monica. The City opposes
abusive or threatening hate speech, intolerance, or
dehumanization, and supports basic civil respect and
human decency.

Listen to others respectfully;
Exercise self-control;
Give open-minded consideration
to all viewpoints;
Focus on the issues and avoid
personalizing debate;
Regular meetings are broadcast live on CityTV cable channel 16 and on the internet at santamonica.gov. Cable television re-broadcasts air on Thursday and Saturday at 11:30 AM. The agenda will air on CityTV on Saturday and Sunday at 11:00 AM and 6:00 PM, and on Monday and Tuesday at 12:30 PM and 6:00 PM.

Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1374 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) City of Santa Monica Generated: 7/28/2025 5:13 PM Page 2

RULES OF ORDER FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS (Resolution No.11663(CCS))

WAYS TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT
If you are interested in providing public comment at a City Council meeting, there are several ways to participate:
(1) Written public comment. In lieu of oral public comment, the public is strongly encouraged to submit written public comment on agenda items via email to [email protected]. For written public comment submitted by 12:00 pm on the day of the meeting, best efforts shall be made to have them available online for viewing. Please note the agenda item number in the subject line of your written comments.
(2) Oral public comment.
- In-person: Persons wishing to address the City Council regarding items on the agenda must be present and submit their name and address (optional) to the City Clerk before the public comment section is opened for that item or before the public hearing is opened where one is required by law. Register to speak at the Speaker Kiosk prior to the meeting. - Telephone: Persons wishing to address the Council by telephone must register at santamonica.gov/public-comment no later than 5:00 p.m. the day before a meeting. Showing electronic presentation materials are not permitted when commenting by telephone.

Oral public comment from any one individual is limited to a total of 6 minutes per City Council meeting, with a maximum of 2 minutes per agenda item if speaking on multiple items. A member of the public may allocate time between items in one-minute increments up to 2 minutes and those requesting to speak on only one agendized item for the meeting may speak for up to 4 minutes on that one item. Except for noticed public hearings or quasi-judicial items, if more than 25 speakers are registered to speak during a public input section, the amount of time shall be reduced to 1 minute per speaker during that section.

Except for the author of the request, public comment on 15-items are limited to 1 minute.

Levine Act Disclosure. Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt Code Section 84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $500 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made. Information regarding the Levine Act can be found here or you can contact the FPPC. ORDER OF BUSINESS (may not be changed except by majority vote of the City Council.)

1. General Public Input
(Members of the public may address the City Council
only on items not on the agenda, but within the
subject matter jurisdiction of the City and on Special
Agenda Items.)

2. Special Agenda Items (Commendations and
Proclamations presented).

3. Public Comment for Consent Calendar and Closed
Sessions Only.

4. Consent Calendar (All items considered in one
motion unless removed by a City Councilmember for
discussion. No public comment is permitted on
second readings.)

5. Closed Sessions.

6. Public Comment on remaining Agenda Items

7. Study Session.

8. Continued Items.

9. Administrative Proceedings.

10. Ordinances:
1st Reading
2nd Reading (No public comment is
permitted on second readings.)

11. Staff Administrative Item.

12. Public Hearings.

13. Reports of Boards and Commissions.

14. Resolutions.

15. Written Communications (Other than
Reports of Commission and Officers.)

16. Councilmember Discussion Items.

Agendas and reports are accessible on the City's webpage at smgov.net/council/agendas. They are also available at the City Clerk's Office and in alternate formats upon request. For a free email subscription to -8211 or
[email protected]. Si desea comunicarse con alguien en español, llame a nuestra oficina al (310) 458-8211 y pida hablar con Esterlina Lugo.

Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1375 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) City of Santa Monica Generated: 7/28/2025 5:13 PM Page 3

AGENDAS

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

SPECIAL MEETING

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1685 MAIN STREET, ROOM 250,
TUESDAY, JULY 29, 2025
MEETING BEGINS AT 5:35 PM

HOW TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT BY TELEPHONE
Persons wishing to address the City Council by telephone must register at santamonica.gov/public-comment no later than 5:00 p.m. the day before a meeting.

Donation of time and showing electronic presentation materials are not permitted when commenting by telephone.

PUBLIC COMMENT BY PHONE IS SUSPENDED FOR THIS SPECIAL MEETING

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

ROLL CALL
(This is a special City Council meeting. Public comment is restricted to only items listed on the agenda.)
City of Santa Monica Statement of Accountability (Land Acknowledgement) The City of Santa Monica is located on the land of Tovangaar. With great respect, the City acknowledges the Gabrieleño/Tongva as the First People of this ancestral and unceded territory of Kuruvungna, a village that we know as Santa Monica. We honor their elders, past and present, and the Gabrieleño descendants who are part of the Gabrieleño /Tongva tribes.

We recognize that these peoples are still here, and as settlers and kuyam (guests), we recognize our responsibility and obligation to care for their land in partnership with them.

The City of Santa Monica commits to work in partnership with the Gabrieleño/Tongva people to uplift their voices and visibility on their ancestral land.

LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS / PROCEDURAL

MOTIONS
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1376 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) City of Santa Monica Generated: 7/28/2025 5:13 PM Page 4

1. GENERAL PUBLIC INPUT AND COMMENT ON SPECIAL AGENDA ITEMS (For regular meetings, public comment is permitted on Special Agenda Items and items not on the agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. State law prohibits the City Council from taking any action on items not listed on the agenda, including issues raised under this agenda item. For special meetings, public input is limited to scheduled Special Agenda Items only.)
. Public input under this item will not be heard at this meeting. This is a special meeting and public input is limited to agenda items only.

2. SPECIAL AGENDA ITEMS
No items

3. PUBLIC INPUT (ITEMS UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR AND CLOSED SESSION ONLY)

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items will be considered and approved in one motion unless removed by a Councilmember for discussion. In accordance with Charter section 615, the adoption of all ordinances and resolutions shall be by reading of title only unless a Councilmember present dissents. No public discussion is permitted on ordinances for second reading and adoption.)
No items

5. CLOSED SESSIONS
No items

CITY MANAGER

TRAVEL ANNOUNCEMENT AND MAYOR'S HIGHLIGHT

6. PUBLIC INPUT ON REMAINING AGENDA ITEMS
. Public Comment by Phone is Suspended for this Special Meeting

7. STUDY SESSION
No items

8. CONTINUED ITEMS
No items

9. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1377 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) City of Santa Monica Generated: 7/28/2025 5:13 PM Page 5 No items

10. ORDINANCES
(Public comment is permitted on ordinances for introduction and first reading. No public discussion is permitted on ordinances for second reading and adoption. In accordance with Charter section 615, the adoption of all ordinances and resolutions shall be by reading of title only unless a Councilmember present dissents.)
No items

11. STAFF ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
No items

12. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items

13. REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
No items

14. RESOLUTIONS
No items

15. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
No items

16. COUNCILMEMBER DISCUSSION ITEMS

16.A. Request by Councilmember Snell, with support from Mayor Pro Tem Torosis and Councilmember Hall, requesting City Council consideration of the following: (1) Remove all six of the current City Council appointed board members to the DTSM Board of Directors; and (2) Make the necessary findings that there currently exists an emergency circumstance which requires the City Council to expedite the appointment process for six new board members to DTSM.

ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and reports are accessible on the City's webpage at www.smgov.net/council/agendas. They are also available at the City Clerk's Office and in alternate formats upon request. For a free email subscription to the City Council Agendas, -8211 or [email protected]. Members of the public unable to attend a meeting but wishing to comment on an item(s) listed on the agenda may submit written comments prior to the meeting by meeting by mailing them to: City Clerk, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401 or to Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1378 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) City of Santa Monica Generated: 7/28/2025 5:13 PM Page 6 [email protected]. Written comments received from the public by 12 PM on the day of the City Council meeting will be distributed to the City Council prior to the meeting and posted online. Members of the public who submit written public comment on an agenda item may be subject to the Levine Act which requires disclosure of campaign contributions of more than $500 to an officer of the City within the preceding 12 months. City Hall and the Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations to either attend or provide public testimony at a Council meeting (i.e. sign language interpreting, access to an amplified sound system, remote option, -8211 or TDD: (310) 917-
6626 or via email at [email protected] at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Best efforts shall be made to accommodate requests received after the 72-hour deadline. In the case of special meetings, requests should be submitted as early as possible, but no later than noon the day of the special Council meeting.

Si desea comunicarse con alguien en español, llame a nuestra oficina al (310) 458-8211 y pida hablar con Esterlina Lugo.

Santa Monica Blue Bus Lines #1, #2, #3, #5, #9 and the EXPO Line serve City Hall.

Parking is available on Main Street, on Olympic Drive, and in the Civic Center Parking Structure (validation free).

Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1379 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: July 29, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.A
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Request by Councilmember Snell, with support from Mayor Pro Tem Torosis and Councilmember Hall, requesting City Council consideration of the following: (1) Remove all six of the current City Council appointed board members to the DTSM Board of Directors; and (2) Make the necessary findings that there currently exists an emergency circumstance which requires the City Council to expedite the appointment process for six new board members to DTSM.

Prepared By: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. DTSM 16 Item

16.A
Packet Pg. 7
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1380 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) Memo
To: Oliver Chi, City Manager
From: Barry Snell, City Councilmember
Cc: Caroline Torosis, Mayor Pro Tem
Dan Hall, City Councilmember
Date: July 25, 2025
Re: Governance Reforms and Emergency Appointments to the Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. (DTSM) Board of Directors
In coordination with Mayor Pro Tem Torosis and Councilmember Hall, we request that the full City Council consider taking immediate action to reform the governance of DTSM by approving the following actions:

1. Removing all six of the current City Council-appointed members to the DTSM Board of

2. Declaring that emergency circumstances exist under which the City Council may appoint acting board members, consistent with DTSM bylaws and State law, while also initiating the formal recruitment process to identify six permanent City Council appointments to the DTSM board.

3. Modifying current City Council practices, including a waiver of ranked-choice voting and Resolution No. 11510 procedures, to allow for the immediate appointment of six interim DTSM board members.

4. Directing that the City Clerk publish a notice of the board vacancies for DTSM and return to As we all know, DTSM plays a pivotal role in shaping the vitality, safety, and economic success of downtown Santa Monica. Unfortunately, members of the public and this City Council have he lack of transparency and accountability as it relates to the policy direction being provided by current Board of Directors.

Given the recent announcement of the resignation of current CEO Andrew Thomas, we believe that the governance issues that currently exist at DTSM can no longer be ignored. Accordingly, we are requesting that the City Council support our request to remove all six of the current City Council appointed board members to the DTSM Board
currently exists an emergency circumstance which requires the City Council to expedite the appointment process for six new board members to DTSM.

By taking these actions now, prior to the selection of a new CEO, the City Council can ensure that DTSM is better positioned to serve the public interest, respond to evolving downtown challenges, aligned City partner moving forward.

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: DTSM 16 Item (7232 : Removal of Council Appointed DTSM Members) Item 16-A
September 9, 2025
Item 16-A
September 9, 2025

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 1381 Attachment: Written Comments (7238 : 16.A. Appointment to 6 scheduled vacancies DTSM (5 Min)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.B
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy for a term ending on June 30, 2026 on the Arts Commission
Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Applicant List
B. Written Comments

16.B
Packet Pg. 1382
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Arts Commission
Name Application Date
Boghosian, Ana 05/31/2025
Carlson, Julius R. 06/20/2025
Carrigan, Bryan 05/09/2025
DiRosa, Joseph 06/20/2025
Kairala, William R. 11/16/2024
Kaplan, David A. 05/23/2025
Lyness, Francine 07/02/2025
Milanovich, Charles J. 08/27/2025
Miller, Phyllis T. 07/28/2025
Sullivan, Thomas 08/09/2025
Vazquez Tompkins, Alyce M. 02/20/2025
Visentini, Tommaso 07/13/2025
Warren, Eric A. 05/23/2025
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 13

16.B.a
Packet Pg. 1383 Attachment: Applicant List (7181 : 16.B. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Arts Commission (5 Min)) 1 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 10:47 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: City Council 9/5 agenda item 16-B: Arts Commission -- Julia Carnahan

EXTERNAL
September 9, 2025
To: Mayor Negrete and City Council members
From: Zina Josephs
RE: Agenda item 16-B -- Arts Commission appointment
I urge the City Council to appoint Julia Carnahan to the Arts Commission.

Julia has served on the Arts Commission's Public Art Subcommittee, so she is familiar with the work of the Commission.

She has also worked with the Getty Museum, the Hammer Museum, the Japanese American Cultural & Community Center, the LA County Museum of Art (LACMA), the Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra, the Museum of Contemporary Art, UCLA World Arts & Culture, Yale University, the Brighton Festival (UK), the Vienna Festival, and the Paris Opera.

Trained as a musician, for the last 20 years she has served on the board of Sounds Like LA, a Santa Monica nonprofit that provides mariachi instruction to students in the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District.

I feel that Julia Carnahan's extensive background and expertise would greatly benefit the Arts Commission.

Thank you for your consideration.

Zina Josephs
(former Arts Commissioner, 1998-2002)
Item 16-B
September 9, 2025
Item 16-B
September 9, 2025

16.B.c
Packet Pg. 1384 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7181 : 16.B. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Arts Commission (5 Min)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Joe Pertel <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 9:21 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16(B) - Arts Commission

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
I am writing in support for the appointment of Julia Carnahan to the Santa Monica Arts Commission.

Julia has served on the Arts Commission’s Public Art Subcommittee for the past two years and sits on the Advisory Board of the Santa Monica Great Park Coalition.

Julia has collaborated with world-renowned artists including Peter Sellars, Esa-Pekka Salonen, Julie Mehretu, Anish Kapoor, Elias Sime, and Vijay Iyer. She was part of the 1990 and 1993 Los Angeles Festival, which grew out of the LA84 Olympic Arts Festival. For over 20 years, she has served on the board of the Los Angeles Poverty Department (LAPD), a Skid Row-based theater collective, and on the board of Sounds Like LA, a Santa Monica nonprofit bringing free world music education to students in SMMUSD and LAUSD. In collaboration w/ Peter Sellars (UCLA Distinguised Professor of the Arts) she also helped launch and lead an important arts-based center in the Department of World Arts &.Cultures at UCLA.

I have known Julia for many years. She's a Sunset Park resident and just a wonderful person.

Regards,
Joe Pertel
Sunset Park
Item 16-B
September 9, 2025
Item 16-B
September 9, 2025

16.B.c
Packet Pg. 1385 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7181 : 16.B. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Arts Commission (5 Min)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Susan Jain
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 10:19 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Council Mailbox; Sofia Klatzker; Jenny Rogers; councilmtgitems Cc: Sofia Klatzker; Jenny Rogers
Subject: re: 16B: Julia Carnahan to fill Opening on the Arts Commission Dear Esteemed Council Members,
As Chairperson of the Santa Monica Arts Commission, I respectfully urge the Council to appoint Julia Carnahan to the open seat on the Arts Commission.

A Sunset Park resident, Julia has served on the Commission’s Public Art Subcommittee for the past two years, where she has consistently elevated our work with her deep cultural insight and unmatched expertise. I have also had the privilege of working alongside her in the international nonprofit arts field for more than three decades, and I can say without hesitation: Julia Carnahan is among the very best.

Trained as a musician, Julia has built an extraordinary career as a producer of arts and cultural programs.

Her projects span leading institutions across Los Angeles and around the globe—including LACMA, UCLA, Getty, MOCA, Cal Performances, the LA Philharmonic, Hammer, AltaSea, JACCC, the Brighton Festival (UK), Yale, the Vienna Festival, and Paris’ L’Opéra—and she has collaborated with such worldclass artists as Peter Sellars, Esa-Pekka Salonen, Julie Mehretu, Anish Kapoor, Hua Wenyi, Elias Sime, and Vijay Iyer.

In Los Angeles, Julia contributed to the landmark 1990 and 1993 Los Angeles Festivals, expanding the legacy of the LA84 Olympic Arts Festival. For the past 20 years, she has served on the boards of the Los Angeles Poverty Department (LAPD), a groundbreaking Skid Row–based theater collective, and Sounds Like LA, a Santa Monica nonprofit that provides world music education to students in SMMUSD and LAUSD. At UCLA, she co-founded and led the Boethius Initiative, a socially engaged arts center housed within the Department of World Arts and Cultures.

In the coming months, three seats will open on the Arts Commission. Julia’s intellect, professional expertise, and unwavering commitment to community and environment make her my top and strongest recommendation. Her appointment would bring invaluable leadership and vision to the Commission at a pivotal moment.

With gratitude,
Susan Jain, PhD
Chairperson,
Santa Monica Arts Commission
Item 16-B
September 9, 2025
Item 16-B
September 9, 2025

16.B.c
Packet Pg. 1386 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7181 : 16.B. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Arts Commission (5 Min)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Sanjeev Jain <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 1:46 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; councilmtgitems Subject: Agenda item 16-B -- Arts Commission appointment

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Esteemed City Council members,
I strongly urge the City Council to appoint Julia Carnahan to the Arts Commission.

Julia has served on the Arts Commission's Public Art Subcommittee, so she is familiar with the work of the Commission.

She has also worked with numerous arts organizations including Getty Museum, the Hammer Museum, the Japanese American Cultural & Community Center, the LA County Museum of Art (LACMA), the Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra, the Museum of Contemporary Art, UCLA World Arts & Culture, Yale University, the Brighton Festival (UK), the Vienna Festival, and the Paris Opera.

Trained as a musician, for the last 20 years she has served on the board of SYMO now known as Sounds Like LA, a Santa Monica nonprofit that provides mariachi instruction to students in the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District.

I feel that Julia Carnahan's extensive background and expertise would greatly benefit the Arts Commission and our community at large.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Sanjeev Jain
23-year Santa Monica resident
Item 16-B
September 9, 2025
Item 16-B
September 9, 2025

16.B.c
Packet Pg. 1387 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7181 : 16.B. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Arts Commission (5 Min)) 1 David Yakobson
From: CS Lim <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 4:01 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; councilmtgitems Subject: Agenda item 16-B – Arts Commission appointment

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and esteemed City Council members,
I write in strong support of the appointment of Julia Carnahan to the Santa Monica Arts Commission. I have collaborated with Julia on presenting film programs in the Los Angeles metropolitan area over a span of 30 years.

This took place while I was Co-Head of Public Programs and Exhibition at the UCLA Film & Television Archive, and in my recent capacity as an independent film curator on projects with the UCLA Boethius Institute and the Getty Research Institute.

Julia will bring creativity, intelligence, and an arts producer’s practical knowledge and experience to the Commission. She has worked with the some of the best-known artists in the US and the world, and will deeply understand what it takes to make culture matter for the Santa Monica community.

It will be a win for Santa Monica to have Julia on the city’s Arts Commission.

Thank you,
Cheng-Sim Lim
Delegate (Asia)
San Sebastian International Film Festival Spain
Item 16-B
September 9, 2025
Item 16-B
September 9, 2025

16.B.c
Packet Pg. 1388 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7181 : 16.B. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Arts Commission (5 Min)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.C
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Appointment to five scheduled vacancies for terms ending on June 30, 2029 on the Measure GS Resident Oversight Committee
Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Applicant List
B. Written Comments

16.C
Packet Pg. 1389
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Measure GS Resident Oversight Committee
Name Application Date
Bertler, Mark J. 06/12/2025
Goltsman, David 03/06/2025
Ramsey, Milan 03/18/2025
Shapiro-Kline, Samuel 07/07/2025
Waterfall, Dave 06/18/2025
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 5

16.C.a
Packet Pg. 1390 Attachment: Applicant List [Revision 1] (7182 : 16.C. Appointments to vacancies on the Measure GS Resident Oversight Commission (5 Min)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Sam Shapiro-Kline <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 9:38 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems; Caroline Torosis
Subject: Appointment to Measure GS Resident Oversight Committee

EXTERNAL
Hello Councilmembers,
Please consider my application for appointment to the Measure GS Resident Oversight Committee.

The city and Measure GS committee need committed residents who can scrutinize our policies and how funds can be spent in a way that maximizes their impact on keeping residents & community members housed. I bring the right combination of expertise in affordable housing finance & development law, creativity and curiosity to find and apply best practices from other jurisdictions, and urgency & bias to action to address our housing crisis.

I previously attended the August Measure GS Committee meeting and was quite shocked to hear that the city's Flexible Financial Assistance program, which was allocated $6M in GS funds, had not launched. I have brought this up with Oliver Chi as well as some of you, and continue to track whether progress has been made. This is the dedication and focus I will bring to the GS Oversight Committee.

Thanks,
Sam Shapiro-Kline
Application text below:

My experience as a housing advocate in Santa Monica and Los Angeles has equipped me with extensive knowledge of planning, zoning, and land use principles directly relevant to the GS oversight committee's work. Currently, I serve as chair of Abundant Housing Los Angeles’s State Policy Committee, where I lead members in analyzing and interpreting housing legislation. This leadership role requires me to identify ways to improve or resolve flaws in proposed bills, drawing on my understanding of housing policy and development processes to anticipate potential implementation issues. This experience has sharpened my ability to evaluate how policies affect real-world housing outcomes - directly applicable to oversight committee deliberations. Though my expertise in zoning, state law, and planning is self-taught rather than professionally acquired, I consider this background an asset. Having developed my knowledge outside traditional professional channels, I can effectively bridge communication gaps between affordable housing professionals and the general public. During my time on the Westside Community Plan Advisory Group, I witnessed firsthand how planning discussions were frequently delayed by the need to explain technical terminology to participants. The committee would benefit from members who can translate complex concepts into accessible language for community members. Through ongoing personal research and monitoring of proposed projects in both Santa Monica and Los Angeles, I've Item 16-C
September 9, 2025
Item 16-C
September 9, 2025

16.C.c
Packet Pg. 1391 Attachment: Written Comments (7182 : 16.C. Appointments to vacancies on the Measure GS Resident Oversight Commission (5 Min)) 2 maintained current knowledge of planning trends and development patterns. This continuous engagement with planning issues ensures I would bring informed perspectives to committee deliberations. I believe my combination of technical knowledge, leadership experience in housing policy, and ability to communicate complex housing finance and development concepts makes me wellqualified to serve on the Measure GS Resident Oversight Committee.

Item 16-C
September 9, 2025
Item 16-C
September 9, 2025

16.C.c
Packet Pg. 1392 Attachment: Written Comments (7182 : 16.C. Appointments to vacancies on the Measure GS Resident Oversight Commission (5 Min)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.D
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy for a term ending on June 30, 2028 on the Disabilities Commission
Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Applicant List

16.D
Packet Pg. 1393
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Disabilities Commission
Name Application Date
Helms, William S. 08/14/2025
Muntaner, Zoë 05/27/2025
Nguyen, Nicole 08/08/2025
Squire, Paul J. 03/10/2025
VerSteeg, Patricia A. 07/29/2025
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 5

16.D.a
Packet Pg. 1394 Attachment: Applicant List [Revision 1] (7270 : 16.D. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Disabilities Commission (5 Min)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.E
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Recommendation to accept Analise Wells's resignation from the Housing Commission and authorize the City Clerk to publish the vacancy Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Resignation Email

16.E
Packet Pg. 1395

16.E.a
Packet Pg. 1396 Attachment: Resignation Email [Revision 2] (7263 : 16.E. Recommendation to accept Analise Wells's resignation (1 Min)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.F
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Recommendation to accept Federico Galavis's resignation from the Arts Commission and authorize the City Clerk to publish the vacancy Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Resignation Email

16.F
Packet Pg. 1397
From: Jade Rodriguez
To: Clerk Mailbox
Cc: Sofia Klatzker; David Yakobson
Subject: Federico Galavis Resignation FW: Resignation :( Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 9:01:32 AM
Attachments: image003.png
Hello,
Below is a resignation email from Federico Galavis for his positions on the Arts Commission and Public Art Committee.

Please let us know if there is anything further you need.

Thank you,
Jade
Jade Rodriguez (She/Her)
Staff Assistant III, Cultural Affairs
(310) 458-2220 ext. 5287
santamonica.gov/the-arts
Sign up for the Cultural Affairs monthly eBlast! – click “The Arts and Artist Opportunities” in the link From: Federico Galavis
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2025 6:07 PM
To: Sofia Klatzker <[email protected]>; Naomi Okuyama <[email protected]>; Allison Ostrovsky <[email protected]> Subject: Resignation :(

EXTERNAL
Dear Sofia,
I am writing to formally resign from my position as Arts Commissioner and from the Public Committee, effective 08/18/2025.. This decision was not made lightly, as serving in this role has been a rewarding experience serving along with you all.

16.F.a
Packet Pg. 1398 Attachment: Resignation Email [Revision 1] (7272 : 16.F. Recommendation to accept Federico Galavis's resignation (1 Min)) I remain deeply committed to the mission of expanding the Arts in our beloved city will be contributing my time and skills to do as much as i can.

Please let me know how I can continue to support your initiatives moving forward.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve. I look forward to continuing to collaborate with all of you.

Sincerely,
Galavis
Founder, Museum of Freedom
Commissioner, Santa Monica Arts Commission
Chair, Media Arts Committee

16.F.a
Packet Pg. 1399 Attachment: Resignation Email [Revision 1] (7272 : 16.F. Recommendation to accept Federico Galavis's resignation (1 Min)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.G
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Recommendation to accept Staci Griesbach's resignation from the Arts Commission and authorize the City Clerk to publish the vacancy Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Resignation Email

16.G
Packet Pg. 1400
1 From: Staci Griesbach <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 10:25 PM
To: Sofia Klatzker <[email protected]>
Subject: Arts Commission
Sofia,
Hope this finds you well. It's been such a pleasure to serve on the Arts Commission for the City of Santa Monica over the past two and a half years. I'm grateful that Council approved for my reappointment in June, but at this time, I'm writing to submit my resignation to the Commission. Perhaps, at some point in the future, I will be able to join and serve again.

Please extend my gratitude for this opportunity to the rest of the cultural affairs staff, the City clerks, staff and the Council.

All my best,
~Staci

16.G.a
Packet Pg. 1401 Attachment: Resignation Email (7279 : 16.G. Recommendation to accept Staci Griesbach's resignation (1 Min)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.H
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Request of Councilmembers Zernitskaya, Hall and Mayor Pro Tem Torosis that the City Council consider directing the City Manager to investigate alleged violations of the Santa Monica Municipal Code related to Waymo’s operation at the Lots on Euclid and Broadway and develop a report that includes a of summary complaints, how the City is taking action, and what additional action(s) are under consideration to resolve resident complaints and alleged municipal code violations. A community meeting between impacted residents and other parties as needed to provide the community with updates on how the City is addressing their concerns and a forum to share experiences shall be held within 30 days.

Prepared By: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. 1- Addressing Waymo Situation
B. Written Comments

16.H
Packet Pg. 1402
Memo
To: Oliver Chi, City Manager
From: Natalya Zernitskaya, City Councilmember
Caroline Torosis, Mayor Pro Tem
Dan Hall, City Councilmember
Date: September 2, 2025
Re: A Request that the City Council Consider Directing the City Manager and Staff to Investigate Alleged Violations of the Santa Monica Municipal Code Related to Waymo’s Operation at the Lots on Euclid and Broadway
During the past several months, the City has been provided with numerous resident complaints related to Waymo’s operation on properties located on Euclid and Broadway. Various news media outlets have reported on how Waymo’s operations in Santa Monica are negatively impacting people who live near the Waymo lots, and residents organized to launch a website (https://waymoproblems.org/) documenting their concerns over existing conditions.

Given these factors, we are requesting that the City Council direct the City Manager and staff to investigate the alleged violations of the Santa Monica Municipal Code related to Waymo’s operation at the lots on Euclid and Broadway. As part of this investigation, the assessment by staff should result in the development of a report that includes a summary of resident complaints, how the City is taking action, and what additional action(s) are under consideration to resolve resident complaints and alleged municipal code violations.

Further, we request that the City Council direct the City Manager within 30 days to coordinate a community meeting between impacted residents and the appropriate city staff, along with other parties as needed, to provide the community with updates related to how the City is addressing their concerns, and to provide a forum for impacted residents to share their experiences and receive clarification on specific concerns and additional actions the City will be taking to improve the existing situation.

Please agendize this matter for City Council consideration at our September 9, 2025 meeting.

16.H.a
Packet Pg. 1403 Attachment: 1- Addressing Waymo Situation (7292 : Waymo Investigation) 1 David Yakobson
From: Andrew Hoyer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 10:02 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell
Cc: Amanda Ventura; Alexander Hall
Subject: Sept 9, 2025: Agenda Item 16-H

EXTERNAL
Councilmembers,
I truly appreciate that you plan to direct our new city manager to investigate the situation with Waymo's parking lot on Euclid Avenue. It is obviously causing the nearby residents significant distress. It is especially worrying to hear reports of not being able to get out of one's own driveway due to a vehicle without a driver blocking your way. I would be livid.

Personally, I am quite upset that the use of this lot within SMMCN's boundaries was never mentioned during our March 18th monthly public board meeting. Apparently, they had started using it in January and reached out to us in early March asking if we'd like to be updated on their progress. We gave them a speaker slot and yet, somehow, this lot's use was not mentioned at all in their presentation or I'm sure there would have been several questions. I was under the impression that they were running all of their activities out of their operational center in the industrial area of West LA on Westgate and Mississippi.

The Euclid lot was under construction for quite some time, so somebody somewhere must have known about this planned use. I think everyone in the area would like to know more about how this industrial use was authorized in our residential/commercial district. I believe Broadway was designated to be Mixed-Use Boulevard Low and this site does not quite fit into that model.

I do want to emphasize that I am not concerned about the noises affecting children at Pluralistic School 1. Their programming includes not restricting the volume of their attendees in any way, shape, or form. I spent an entire rainy day on 12th Street observing and listening to the school and its activities. The noise level was incredible. It has actually caused folks to move away from the home where they raised their children. So, I do not want to hear any concerns expressed for how Waymo's actions are affecting them. They view noise as self-expression that should not be repressed.

Thank you again for trying to see if anything can be done about this situation. Waymo needs to make this right for our community.

Andrew Hoyer
SMMCN Board President
There is only one moment in time when it is essential to awaken. That moment is now. - Buddha
Item 16-H
September 9, 2025
Item 16-H
September 9, 2025

16.H.b
Packet Pg. 1404 Attachment: Written Comments (7292 : Waymo Investigation) 2 David Yakobson
From: Ellen Hannan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 10:32 AM
To: Clerk Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Barry Snell; [email protected]; Andrew Hoyer
Subject: Agenda 16H 9/9/2025

EXTERNAL
It is very disturbing to drive in the heavy traffic in Santa Monica. Over the past few weeks I have encountered numerous issues with Waymo cars blocking traffic.

I would be very distressed if I lived near the overnight parking area of Waymo. There have been no issues that I am aware of for the Tesla lot at Santa Monica and 14th St.

Maybe it is because Tesla representatives and City Planning Staff and Mobility Staff met with SM Mid City Neighbors. We made many constructive suggestions regarding the future operations of the site. All of our ideas were incorporated in the plan for the site.

Not that the Tesla owners follow all the rules but at least it appears to work for all of us.

Waymo never mentioned at our meeting with them any plans for an overnight working site in the middle of a residential neighborhood. Auto dealerships have very strict hours.

This work must be considered in a zone plan as automotive repair and servicing.

Ellen Hannan
1218 9th St #6
Santa Monica CA 90401
Item 16-H
September 9, 2025
Item 16-H
September 9, 2025

16.H.b
Packet Pg. 1405 Attachment: Written Comments (7292 : Waymo Investigation) 3 David Yakobson
From: paula achter <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 10:41 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Why Did Birds Stop Singing on 12th court - ITEM 16 H, Council Meeting 9.9.2025

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
~Two months ago, I sent the complaint below to Waymo (& SM City) asking Waymo to reroute their vehicles through the streets and not the alleys. They did for a short while, but soon they returned to going through our alley.

Since then, I've learned that ALL the impacted neighbors prefer Waymo using the street access despite occasional traffic pile ups. Our alley was never designed for this heavy usage. Waymos pass every 20 seconds 24/7.

I've tried brown noise, white noise, noise curtains and many other devices to kill the noise, but if i wake up at night, i can't go back to sleep. As a senior, my health & sanity are greatly affected by the resulting lack of sleep and peace that i have carefully documented.

There is growing organized resentment and a belief that this project is illegal and was fraudulently approved. The City must support its citizens to end our suffering as Waymo will not voluntarily do so. "I live on the 12th court alleyway in Santa Monica where there are two charging stations servicing >54 Waymo cars. They are routing the approach down my alley... instead of using the streets. All night & day there are wining electric cars ripping past my office and bedroom windows.

There are no setbacks in the alley as in the street. This is unfair to turn my residential neighborhood into an industrial hell for your profit.

Please reroute your cars to use the streets instead of the alleys. Your stations are located at the end of the block and this modification is totally doable. Sincerely, Tired & Pissed Off" Sincerely,
Paula
Paula Achter
resident
1534 Euclid St.

Santa Monica, CA 90404
Item 16-H
September 9, 2025
Item 16-H
September 9, 2025

16.H.b
Packet Pg. 1406 Attachment: Written Comments (7292 : Waymo Investigation) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.I
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Request of Mayor Negrete that the City Council direct the City Manager to create a pilot microgrant program to address the habitability of RentControlled/Deed Restricted Units.

Prepared By: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. 2-Microgrants Pilot to Enhance Habitability of Rent Controlled Units B. Written Comments

16.I
Packet Pg. 1407
Memo
To: Oliver Chi, City Manager
From: Lana Negrete, Mayor
Date: September 2, 2025
Re: A Request that the City Council Consider Directing the City Manager to Create a Micro Grant Program to Address Habitability of Rent-Controlled / Deed Restricted Units One of the common concerns that the City hears from those residing in rent-controlled and deed restricted housing units relates to issues of habitability. In an effort to address this particular ongoing issue, I am requesting that the City Council support my motion to direct that staff develop a pilot habitability improvement grant program for owners of rent-controlled / deed restricted units.

Through this program, I would envision that rent-controlled and deed-restricted property owners in Santa Monica would be able to apply for and receive micro grants. Those micro grant funds could then be eligible for use towards addressing and improving rehabilitation, housing quality standards, and the overall habitability of rent-controlled / deed restricted units.

Please place this item on the September 9 agenda for full City Council consideration.

16.I.a
Packet Pg. 1408 Attachment: 2-Microgrants Pilot to Enhance Habitability of Rent Controlled Units (7293 : Microgrant for Rent-Controlled/Deed Restricted Units) 1 David Yakobson
From: Ralph Mechur <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 11:24 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: agenda item 16 I

EXTERNAL
Mayor and Council,
The Mayor's request to create a micro grants program for improvements to rent controlled/deedrestricted units raises several questions.

1. where would the funds come from?

2. who would administer the program and evaluate the requests?

3. who would inspect the work?

4. what metric would be used? would the focus be sustainability? health and safety? There are State and Federal standards for habitability existing.

5. couldn't there be a pot of funds for specific upgrades such as insulation, hvac upgrades, energy usage reductions?

6. would units that have been through vacancy decontrol and are leased at or near market rate be included?

7. would this be for any such unit or for entire buildings or both?

8. If a metric is created to help rank needs would it also apply to all rental buildings/units in Santa Monica and would there be a way to have tenants annually review compliance? Sincerely,
--
Ralph Mechur
Ralph Mechur Architects
2800 Airport Avenue, #1A
Santa Monica, CA 90405
o: 310-398-2940
m: 310-721-1254
Item 16-I
September 9, 2025
Item 16-I
September 9, 2025

16.I.b
Packet Pg. 1409 Attachment: Written Comments (7293 : Microgrant for Rent-Controlled/Deed Restricted Units) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.J
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Request of Mayor Negrete that the City Council direct the City Manager to create an online portal and mapping feature to track the application status and progress of all Development Entities taking advantage of the new Off-Site Affordable Housing Pilot Incentive Program.

Prepared By: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. 3 - Developing a Mapping Tool to ID Offsite Affordable Housing Incentive Program Projects

16.J
Packet Pg. 1410
Memo
To: Oliver Chi, City Manager
From: Lana Negrete, Mayor
Date: September 2, 2025
Re: A Request that the City Council Consider Directing the City Manager to Create an Online Portal and Mapping Feature to Track the Application Status and Progress of all Development Entities Taking Advantage of the New Off-Site Affordable Housing Pilot Incentive Program
At our August 12 council meeting, the City Council adopted an off-site affordable housing pilot incentive program. Through that new program, up to 1,000 units of previously approved housing units can apply to modify their existing affordable housing requirements by either 1) relocating those units to an off-site location; 2) perform substantial rehabilitation of existing units; or 3) pay the City an established in-lieu fee.

Given the way in which this program could expand large-scale construction activity throughout the City, I have an interest in ensuring that the public is kept fully aware of where these projects could advance. In that way, if the incentive program activates additional multi-family development activity, residents will know the location of the pending construction projects.

Accordingly, I would like the City Council to consider my request that the City Manager create an online portal and mapping feature to track the application status and progress of all development entities that have submitted an application utilizing the off-site affordable housing pilot incentive program.

Please place this item on the September 9 agenda for full City Council consideration.

16.J.a
Packet Pg. 1411 Attachment: 3 - Developing a Mapping Tool to ID Offsite Affordable Housing Incentive Program Projects (7294 : Portal and Mapping for City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.K
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Request of Councilmember Raskin that the City Council consider directing the City Manager to discontinue work efforts related to four previously requested Council Direction 16 Items.

Prepared By: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. 4 - Discontinue Work On Four 16 Items

16.K
Packet Pg. 1412
Memo
To: Oliver Chi, City Manager
From: Ellis Raskin, City Councilmember
Date: September 2, 2025
Re: A Request that the City Council Consider Directing the City Manager to Discontinue Work Efforts Related to Five Previously Requested Council Direction 16 Items Since February 2021, the City Council has directed that staff coordinate work efforts as separate Council Direction 16 Items. Of note, 232 of those matters have been completed to date, leaving 34 items pending.

After reviewing the remaining open items with staff, I am requesting that the City Council consider directing that staff discontinue work efforts on the 4 previously requested Council Direction 16 Items listed below.

Item
No. 16 Item Detail Current Status – August 2025
1 Request of Councilmember de la Torre, Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, and Councilmember Parra that in the spirit of acknowledging Nick Gabaldon’s mixed heritage and to build intercultural solidarity, upon completion of Reframe: City Hall Murals, initiate a public art and community engagement Reframe project to commemorate the Historic Bay Street Beach site and its rich history of Black surfers, including Nick Gabaldon. In commemorating Nick Gabaldon, consideration will be given to creating a statue of Nick Gabaldon with his surfboard looking out towards Malibu where he passed while surfing. The process will include engaging an artist to commemorate the Historic Bay Street Beach site’s history and people while creating a powerful acknowledgement of people of color who were pioneers in the sport of surfing.

The artist and
their gallery have
been
unresponsive and
there is no
identified budget
for this project.
2 Request of Mayor Davis and Councilmembers Zwick and Brock that the City Council direct the City Manager and City Attorney to study and draft an ordinance that would guarantee healthcare workers a minimum wage in Santa Monica.

Preempted by
recent changes
to state law
3 Request of Mayor Brock and Vice Mayor Negrete that the City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk develop and return to City Council with recommendations to establish a Youth Commission (or Council) based on best practices. The City currently engages youth at PAL (Youth Leadership Council), Virginia Avenue Park (Teen Leadership Council), and the Library (Teen Leadership Council) and a Youth Commission (or Council) would represent an opportunity to expand opportunities for youth to be involved in city government.

In addition to evaluating a Youth Commission (or Council), the City Manager and City Attorney are also encouraged to explore other opportunities such as evaluating the potential to add dedicated seats for youth on existing boards or commissions.

Formation of a
new Youth
Commission /
Council would be
duplicative of
current youth
bodies.

16.K.a
Packet Pg. 1413 Attachment: 4 - Discontinue Work On Four 16 Items (7295 : Discontinue Work on 16 Items) Memo
4 In response to concerns raised by residents regarding privacy and safety, request by Councilmember Parra and Mayor Brock to direct the City Manager and City Attorney to begin the process of amending the Zoning Ordinance to increase heights in the front yard setback in R2, R3, and R4 zone districts, with particular consideration for the appropriateness of 60 inches in height, with 50% transparency for walls and fences above 42 inches in height within the context of crime prevention principles; address measurements that may include retaining walls; and suspend enforcement and pending applications until the ordinance becomes effective in R2, R3, and R4 for those that would comply with that standard. Given the considerable amount of work that has been performed to date on this issue, the City Attorney and City Manager are being asked to return to City Council with a recommendation in 90 days or as soon as possible thereafter. The City Attorney and City Manager are further directed to immediately initiate community engagement on this matter to be included in the recommendation to City Council.

Priority shift.

Please agendize this matter for City Council consideration at our September 9, 2025 meeting.

16.K.a
Packet Pg. 1414 Attachment: 4 - Discontinue Work On Four 16 Items (7295 : Discontinue Work on 16 Items) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: September 9, 2025
Agenda Item: 16.L
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Request of Councilmember Snell that the City Council consider waving of fees for the GREENwell event organized by Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.

Sigma Lambda Omega Chapter on Sunday, September 21, 2025, that will celebrate their participation in the Coastal Clean Up Day 2025 , by directing the City Manager to waive the City’s portion of fees, including application, administrative, neighborhood notification, container fees, parking, and zero waste plan fees associated with the use of Cresent Bay Park in an amount up to $2,150 in waived fees.

Prepared By: Nikima Newsome, City Clerk
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. 5- GREENwell Fee Waiver

16.L
Packet Pg. 1415
Memo
To: Oliver Chi, City Manager
From: Barry Snell, City Councilmember
Date: September 2, 2025
Re: A Request that the City Council Consider Directing the City Manager to approve waving of fees for the GREENwell event organized by Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority in an amount up to $2,150.

Since 2023, AKA has partnered with the environmental non-profit Heal the Bay of Santa Monica for Coastal Cleanup Day, held on the third Saturday of September. Nearly 20 Alpha Kappa Alpha Southern California chapters, including the Santa Monica chapter, participate in this community service project to help rid the Pacific Ocean, local waterways, and parks of plastic and debris.

GREENwell event at Crescent Park is being organized by Alpha Kappa Alpha (AKA) Sorority, Inc.

Sigma Lambda Omega Chapter on Sunday, September 21, 2025, to celebrate their participation in the Coastal Clean Up Day 2025 event organized by Heal the Bay and sponsored by the City on Saturday, September 20, 2025.

GREENwell - Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated® Sigma Lambda Omega Chapter Below is the breakdown of the fees to be waived for council consideration.

RAD Event Application Fee $ 380.57
Administrative Fee $ 116.43
Neighbor Notification Fee $ 220.70
Subtotal $ 717.70
RRR Trash Container $ 169.38
Recycling Container $ 169.38
Compost Container $ 169.38
Coordination $ 319.31
($500 deposit will be required)
Subtotal $ 827.45
Parking 50 Spaces $ 600.00
Subtotal $ 600.00
Total Fee Waiver Requested $ 2,145.15
Please agendize this matter for City Council consideration at our September 9, 2025 meeting.

16.L.a
Packet Pg. 1416 Attachment: 5- GREENwell Fee Waiver (7296 : Waive Fees for GREENwell Event)