Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) — Santa Monica City Council, September 30, 2025 (part 2 of 3)

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Margaret Meadows
Project Manager
Thomas Reese
Senior Project Coordinator
Matt Evans
Senior Project Coordinator
Sohrab Mikanik
Tech Lead
Kyle Santiago
Creative Lead
Issac Chavez
Project Coordinator TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 160.81 $ 106.38 $ 98.96 $ 173.18 $ 136.07 $ 59.38 124.91% 10.00%

ARELLANO ASSOCIATES (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
295 315 374 2 132 394 1,512 64,536.00 $ $ 2,962.64 $ 84,312.55 $ 15,181.12 $ 28,950.00 $ 195,942.31 85 85 44 2 2 24 242 11,766.00 $ 540.14 $ 15,371.60 $ 2,767.77 $ 10,000.00 $ 40,445.51 $ 5 10 30 45 1,475.00 $ 67.71 $ 1,927.00 $ 346.97 $ 3,816.69 $ 30 25 25 50 25 155 7,375.00 $ 338.56 $ 9,635.01 $ 1,734.86 $ 8,000.00 $ 27,083.43 $ 25 25 25 25 10 110 5,315.00 $ 243.99 $ 6,943.74 $ 1,250.27 $ 5,000.00 $ 18,753.01 $ 25 45 45 25 45 185 7,815.00 $ 358.76 $ 10,209.85 $ 1,838.36 $ 300.00 $ 20,521.97 $ 25 25 100 150 300 10,300.00 $ 472.84 $ 13,456.35 $ 2,422.92 $ 3,000.00 $ 29,652.11 $ 25 25 45 60 155 5,940.00 $ 272.69 $ 7,760.27 $ 1,397.30 $ 650.00 $ 16,020.25 $ 25 25 40 40 130 5,260.00 $ 241.47 $ 6,871.89 $ 1,237.34 $ 13,610.69 $ 50 50 50 30 10 190 9,290.00 $ 426.47 $ 12,136.85 $ 2,185.33 $ 2,000.00 $ 26,038.65 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
325 345 424 2 152 444 1,692
$ 36,701.93 52,263.48 $ 41,959.21 $ 346.36 $ 20,682.73 $ 26,363.03 $ 72,076.00 $ 3,308.77 $ 94,163.12 $ 16,954.79 $ 28,950.00 $ $ 215,452.69

1.26% 0.88% 1.01% 0.01% 0.50% 0.63%

Page 9 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Lori Burne
QA/QC Manager
Molly Iley
SR Bridge Engineer
Staff EngineerI
Michael Capili
Staff Engineer II
Assistant Engineer
Sr CADD Technician
Drafting Technician II
Admin/Clerical TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 226.48 $ 210.97 $ 124.10 $ 108.59 $ 77.56 $ 217.17 $ 96.95 $ 77.56 182.04% 10.00% 20 50 8 50 40 168 9,730.00 $ $ 132.23 $ 17,953.20 $ ‐ 2,781.54 $ $ 30,596.98 $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
20 50 8 50 40 168 9,730.00 $ 132.23 $ 17,953.20 $ 2,781.54 $ 30,596.98 $ 200 459 64 526 145 280 214 18 1906 97,144.50 $ $ 1,320.19 $ 179,245.13 $ 27,770.98 $ 2,000.00 $ 307,480.80 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 48 451 234 145 280 12 1170 65,887.00 $ 895.40 $ 121,570.69 $ 18,835.31 $ 500.00 $ 207,688.40 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
32 320 146 100 200 6 804 45,856.00 $ 623.18 $ 84,610.70 $ 13,108.99 $ 144,198.88 $ 16 131 88 45 80 6 366 20,031.00 $ 272.22 $ 36,959.98 $ 5,726.32 $ 500.00 $ 63,489.53 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

BURNE ENGINEERING (DBE)

Page 10 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

BURNE ENGINEERING (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 152 8 64 292 214 6 736 31,257.50 $ 424.79 $ 57,674.44 $ 8,935.67 $ 1,500.00 $ 99,792.40 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
152 8 64 292 214 6 736 31,257.50 $ 424.79 $ 57,674.44 $ 8,935.67 $ 1,500.00 $ 99,792.40 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

Page 11 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Lori Burne
QA/QC Manager
Molly Iley
SR Bridge Engineer
Staff EngineerI
Michael Capili
Staff Engineer II
Assistant Engineer
Sr CADD Technician
Drafting Technician II
Admin/Clerical TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 226.48 $ 210.97 $ 124.10 $ 108.59 $ 77.56 $ 217.17 $ 96.95 $ 77.56 182.04% 10.00%

BURNE ENGINEERING (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 220 509 72 576 145 320 214 18 2,074
$ 107,381.64 49,825.18 $ 8,935.03 $ 62,545.19 $ 11,246.35 $ 69,494.66 $ 20,747.58 $ 1,396.10 $ 106,874.50 $ 1,452.42 $ 197,198.33 $ 30,552.53 $ 2,000.00 $ $ 338,077.78

1.20% 2.58% 0.21% 1.50% 0.27% 1.67% 0.50% 0.03%

Page 12 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Jason Reynolds, Director
Sarah Richmond, Spec.V
Carolyn Groves, Spec. II
GIS Analyst III, TBD
Technical Editor II, TBD
Pubs Spec. II, TBD TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 277.99 $ 158.27 $ 121.12 $ 122.30 $ 107.91 $ 95.68 161.61% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
DUDEK

Page 13 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Jason Reynolds, Director
Sarah Richmond, Spec.V
Carolyn Groves, Spec. II
GIS Analyst III, TBD
Technical Editor II, TBD
Pubs Spec. II, TBD TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 277.99 $ 158.27 $ 121.12 $ 122.30 $ 107.91 $ 95.68 161.61% 10.00% DUDEK
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $

Page 14 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Jason Reynolds, Director
Sarah Richmond, Spec.V
Carolyn Groves, Spec. II
GIS Analyst III, TBD
Technical Editor II, TBD
Pubs Spec. II, TBD TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 277.99 $ 158.27 $ 121.12 $ 122.30 $ 107.91 $ 95.68 161.61% 10.00% DUDEK
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
54 85 280 36 30 23 508 25,096.35 $ $ 644.47 $ 41,599.75 $ 6,734.06 $ 140.63 $ 74,215.25 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
54 85 280 36 30 23 508 25,096.35 $ 644.47 $ 41,599.75 $ 6,734.06 $ 140.63 $ 74,215.25 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
54 85 280 36 30 23 508
$ 13,453.30 15,011.29 $ 33,914.38 $ 4,402.90 $ 3,237.42 $ 2,200.73 $ 25,096.35 $ 644.47 $ 41,599.75 $ 6,734.06 $ 140.63 $ $ 74,215.25

0.36% 0.32% 0.82% 0.11% 0.08% 0.05%

Page 15 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Eric Brown
Project Manager
Hubert Law
Principal Engineer
Pat Wilson
Senior Engineer
Michael Hoshiyama
Senior Project Geologist
Dane Nicklaus
Project Engineer
Bernardo Ambriz
Senior Staff Engineer
Doug Brown
Staff Engineer
Kiat Kaekul
Senior Technician
Edson Amaro
Technician TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 299.80 $ 299.80 $ 212.65 $ 185.95 $ 156.80 $ 144.22 $ 103.10 $ 154.66 $ 79.78 178.96% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
91 14 28 96 96 372 393 121 105 1316 62,439.30 $ $1,512.68 114,448.46 $ $ 17,840.04 $ 118,750.00 $ 314,990.48 $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
EARTH MECHANICS, INC. (DBE)

Page 16 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Eric Brown
Project Manager
Hubert Law
Principal Engineer
Pat Wilson
Senior Engineer
Michael Hoshiyama
Senior Project Geologist
Dane Nicklaus
Project Engineer
Bernardo Ambriz
Senior Staff Engineer
Doug Brown
Staff Engineer
Kiat Kaekul
Senior Technician
Edson Amaro
Technician TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 299.80 $ 299.80 $ 212.65 $ 185.95 $ 156.80 $ 144.22 $ 103.10 $ 154.66 $ 79.78 178.96% 10.00% EARTH MECHANICS, INC. (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
91 14 28 96 96 372 393 121 105 1,316 62,439.30 $ $1,512.68 114,448.46 $ 17,840.04 $ $118,750.00 314,990.48 $ 91 14 28 96 96 372 393 121 105 1,316 62,439.30 $ $1,512.68 114,448.46 $ 17,840.04 $ $118,750.00 314,990.48 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $

Page 17 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Eric Brown
Project Manager
Hubert Law
Principal Engineer
Pat Wilson
Senior Engineer
Michael Hoshiyama
Senior Project Geologist
Dane Nicklaus
Project Engineer
Bernardo Ambriz
Senior Staff Engineer
Doug Brown
Staff Engineer
Kiat Kaekul
Senior Technician
Edson Amaro
Technician TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 299.80 $ 299.80 $ 212.65 $ 185.95 $ 156.80 $ 144.22 $ 103.10 $ 154.66 $ 79.78 178.96% 10.00% EARTH MECHANICS, INC. (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
91 14 28 96 96 372 393 121 105 1,316
$ 4,197.18 27,281.65 $ 5,954.23 $ 17,851.65 $ 15,053.13 $ 53,650.70 $ 40,519.71 $ 18,713.30 $ 8,377.17 $ 62,439.30 $ $1,512.68 114,448.46 $ 17,840.04 $ 118,750.00 $ $ 314,990.48

0.66% 0.10% 0.14% 0.43% 0.36% 1.29% 0.97% 0.45% 0.20%

Page 18 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Associate
Senior Engineer/Geologist
Asbestos Consultant
Staff Engineer/Geologist
Staff (PW)
Technical Typist/Drafting
Industrial Hygienist TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 258.32 $ 215.35 $ 152.14 $ 97.07 $ 183.02 $ 80.73 $ 193.74 185.00% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 3 17 48 28 24 14 2 136 6,496.54 $ $ 12,018.60 $ 1,851.51 $ 10,205.00 $ 30,571.66 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
GEOCON WEST, INC.

Page 19 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Associate
Senior Engineer/Geologist
Asbestos Consultant
Staff Engineer/Geologist
Staff (PW)
Technical Typist/Drafting
Industrial Hygienist TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 258.32 $ 215.35 $ 152.14 $ 97.07 $ 183.02 $ 80.73 $ 193.74 185.00% 10.00% GEOCON WEST, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

Page 20 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Associate
Senior Engineer/Geologist
Asbestos Consultant
Staff Engineer/Geologist
Staff (PW)
Technical Typist/Drafting
Industrial Hygienist TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 258.32 $ 215.35 $ 152.14 $ 97.07 $ 183.02 $ 80.73 $ 193.74 185.00% 10.00% GEOCON WEST, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 3 17 48 28 24 14 2 136 6,496.54 $ 12,018.60 $ 1,851.51 $ 10,205.00 $ 30,571.66 $ 3 17 48 28 24 14 2 136 6,496.54 $ 12,018.60 $ 1,851.51 $ 10,205.00 $ 30,571.66 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
3 17 48 28 24 14 2 136
$ 3,660.87 774.97 $ 7,302.80 $ 2,717.83 $ 4,392.54 $ 1,130.17 $ 387.49 $ 6,496.54 $ 12,018.60 $ 1,851.51 $ 10,205.00 $ $ 30,571.66

0.02% 0.09% 0.18% 0.07% 0.11% 0.03% 0.01%

Page 21 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Lisa Spivak, PLS
Survey Manager
Justin Height, PLS
Sr. Project Surveyor
Project Surveyor
Sr. Survey Analyst
Survey Analyst
Survey Technician
PLS Party Chief**
Certified Party Chief**
Chainman**
Apprentice(Avg)** TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 324.21 $ 243.96 $ 224.70 $ 176.55 $ 160.50 $ 128.40 $ 219.12 $ 204.03 $ 174.24 $ 121.98 191.82% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
24 20 16 40 76 40 48 90 114 24 492 28,760.80 $ $ 55,168.97 $ 8,392.98 $ 6,156.25 $ 98,478.99 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
14 20 72 80 56 24 266 15,570.48 $ 29,867.29 $ 4,543.78 $ 6,156.25 $ 56,137.80 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $

GUIDA SURVEYING

Page 22 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

GUIDA SURVEYING
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
10 16 40 4 40 48 10 58 226 13,190.32 $ 25,301.67 $ 3,849.20 $ - $ 42,341.19 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
10 16 40 4 40 48 10 58 226 13,190.32 $ 25,301.67 $ 3,849.20 $ 42,341.19 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $

Page 23 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Lisa Spivak, PLS
Survey Manager
Justin Height, PLS
Sr. Project Surveyor
Project Surveyor
Sr. Survey Analyst
Survey Analyst
Survey Technician
PLS Party Chief**
Certified Party Chief**
Chainman**
Apprentice(Avg)** TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 324.21 $ 243.96 $ 224.70 $ 176.55 $ 160.50 $ 128.40 $ 219.12 $ 204.03 $ 174.24 $ 121.98 191.82% 10.00%

GUIDA SURVEYING
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
24 20 16 40 76 40 48 90 114 24 492
$ 4,879.23 7,781.09 $ 3,595.22 $ 7,062.04 $ 12,198.08 $ 5,136.03 $ 10,517.57 $ 18,362.60 $ 19,863.35 $ 2,927.54 $ 28,760.80 $ 55,168.97 $ 8,392.98 $ 6,156.25 $ $ 98,478.99

0.19% 0.12% 0.09% 0.17% 0.29% 0.12% 0.25% 0.44% 0.48% 0.07%

Page 24 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Jessica Feldman
Senior Consultant III
John Heller
Project Director
Molly Iker‐Johnson
Associate Consultant II
Milagros Mujica
Associate Consultant II
Brittany Buscombe
Senior Consultant II
Elizabeth Irvin
Senior Consultant III
Jenelle Mountain‐Castro
Associate Consultant II TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 159.94 $ 216.06 $ 110.80 $ 103.88 $ 141.50 $ 155.82 $ 130.53 161.89% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 32 158 200 66 14 32 14 516 26,751.50 $ $ 977.57 $ 44,890.59 $ 7,261.97 $ 290.00 $ 80,171.63 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 12 40 60 20 4 4 2 142 7,198.50 $ 263.05 $ 12,079.51 $ 1,954.11 $ - $ 21,495.17 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
12 40 60 20 4 4 2 142 7,198.50 $ 263.05 $ 12,079.51 $ 1,954.11 $ 21,495.17 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ ICF JONES & STOKES, INC.

Page 25 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Jessica Feldman
Senior Consultant III
John Heller
Project Director
Molly Iker‐Johnson
Associate Consultant II
Milagros Mujica
Associate Consultant II
Brittany Buscombe
Senior Consultant II
Elizabeth Irvin
Senior Consultant III
Jenelle Mountain‐Castro
Associate Consultant II TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 159.94 $ 216.06 $ 110.80 $ 103.88 $ 141.50 $ 155.82 $ 130.53 161.89% 10.00% ICF JONES & STOKES, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $

Page 26 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Jessica Feldman
Senior Consultant III
John Heller
Project Director
Molly Iker‐Johnson
Associate Consultant II
Milagros Mujica
Associate Consultant II
Brittany Buscombe
Senior Consultant II
Elizabeth Irvin
Senior Consultant III
Jenelle Mountain‐Castro
Associate Consultant II TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 159.94 $ 216.06 $ 110.80 $ 103.88 $ 141.50 $ 155.82 $ 130.53 161.89% 10.00% ICF JONES & STOKES, INC.
20 118 140 46 10 28 12 374 19,553.00 $ 714.52 $ 32,811.09 $ 5,307.86 $ 290.00 $ 58,676.47 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
24 30 54 2,953.80 $ 107.94 $ 4,956.65 $ 801.84 $ 290.00 $ 9,110.23 $ 20 94 110 46 10 28 12 320 16,599.20 $ 606.58 $ 27,854.44 $ 4,506.02 $ 49,566.24 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 32 158 200 66 14 32 14 516
$ 34,137.37 5,118.13 $ 22,159.04 $ 6,856.17 $ 1,981.06 $ 4,986.30 $ 1,827.40 $ 26,751.50 $ 977.57 $ 44,890.59 $ 7,261.97 $ 290.00 $ $ 80,171.63

0.12% 0.82% 0.53% 0.16% 0.05% 0.12% 0.04%

Page 27 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Principal Landscape Arch
Senior Landscape Architect
Irrigation Specialist
Senior Landscape Designer
Landscape Designer
Project Accountant TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 244.65 $ 165.50 $ 143.92 $ 126.47 $ 86.81 $ 115.13 164.20% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
36 55 93 272 198 41 695 30,143.50 $ $ 409.65 $ 50,168.27 $ 8,072.14 $ 88,793.55 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC.

Page 28 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Principal Landscape Arch
Senior Landscape Architect
Irrigation Specialist
Senior Landscape Designer
Landscape Designer
Project Accountant TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 244.65 $ 165.50 $ 143.92 $ 126.47 $ 86.81 $ 115.13 164.20% 10.00% MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
36 55 93 272 198 41 695 30,143.50 $ 409.65 $ 50,168.27 $ 8,072.14 $ 88,793.55 $ 36 55 93 272 198 41 695 30,143.50 $ 409.65 $ 50,168.27 $ 8,072.14 $ 88,793.55 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $

Page 29 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Principal Landscape Arch
Senior Landscape Architect
Irrigation Specialist
Senior Landscape Designer
Landscape Designer
Project Accountant TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 244.65 $ 165.50 $ 143.92 $ 126.47 $ 86.81 $ 115.13 164.20% 10.00% MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
36 55 93 272 198 41 695
$ 9,102.74 8,807.38 $ 13,384.75 $ 34,400.00 $ 17,188.02 $ 4,720.15 $ 30,143.50 $ 409.65 $ 50,168.27 $ 8,072.14 $ $ 88,793.55

0.21% 0.22% 0.32% 0.83% 0.41% 0.11%

Page 30 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION

PEN (ELEC)
EN5 (ELEC)
DE5 (ELEC)
EN3 (PLUMB)
D3 (PLUMB)
DE5 (FP)
DE3 (FP)
EN5 (MECH)
DE3 (MECH)
CAD/BIM4 TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 496.92 $ 288.39 $ 235.08 $ 251.30 $ 161.80 $ 212.16 $ 149.32 $ 286.57 $ 161.80 $ 127.27 194.77% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
5 111 252 16 103 13 41 19 39 70 669 44,399.75 $ $ 603.39 $ 87,654.74 $ 13,265.79 $ 145,923.67 $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
8 41 7 56 3,958.77 $ 53.80 $ 7,815.47 $ 1,182.80 $ 13,010.84 $ 22 4 322.88 $ 4.39 $ 637.44 $ 96.47 $ 1,061.17 $ 11 2 161.44 $ 2.19 $ 318.72 $ 48.24 $ 530.59 $ 2 16 4 22 1,494.88 $ 20.32 $ 2,951.22 $ 446.64 $ 4,913.05 $ 1 12 2 15 1,037.44 $ 14.10 $ 2,048.13 $ 309.97 $ 3,409.64 $ 18 1 10 708.19 $ 9.62 $ 1,398.12 $ 211.59 $ 2,327.53 $
12 3 233.94 $ 3.18 $ 461.85 $ 69.90 $ 768.86 $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
1 12 7 7 27 2,002.78 $ 27.22 $ 3,953.92 $ 598.39 $ 6,582.31 $ 11 2 161.44 $ 2.19 $ 318.72 $ 48.24 $ 530.59 $
16 2 4 13 988.89 $ 13.44 $ 1,952.28 $ 295.46 $ 3,250.07 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
22 2 6 401.38 $ 5.45 $ 792.41 $ 119.92 $ 1,319.17 $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
21 1 4 289.63 $ 3.94 $ 571.79 $ 86.54 $ 951.89 $ 11 2 161.44 $ 2.19 $ 318.72 $ 48.24 $ 530.59 $ 1 6 29 12 48 3,260.39 $ 44.31 $ 6,436.72 $ 974.14 $ 10,715.56 $ 12 3 233.94 $ 3.18 $ 461.85 $ 69.90 $ 768.86 $
11 2 161.44 $ 2.19 $ 318.72 $ 48.24 $ 530.59 $
1 3 24 12 40 2,631.07 $ 35.76 $ 5,194.30 $ 786.11 $ 8,647.24 $ 1 1 10 6 18 1,202.69 $ 16.34 $ 2,374.37 $ 359.34 $ 3,952.75 $ 18 4 13 825.94 $ 11.22 $ 1,630.58 $ 246.77 $ 2,714.52 $ 16 2 9 602.44 $ 8.19 $ 1,189.35 $ 180.00 $ 1,979.97 $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
12 3 233.94 $ 3.18 $ 461.85 $ 69.90 $ 768.86 $
P2S, INC.

Page 31 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

PEN (ELEC)
EN5 (ELEC)
DE5 (ELEC)
EN3 (PLUMB)
D3 (PLUMB)
DE5 (FP)
DE3 (FP)
EN5 (MECH)
DE3 (MECH)
CAD/BIM4 TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 496.92 $ 288.39 $ 235.08 $ 251.30 $ 161.80 $ 212.16 $ 149.32 $ 286.57 $ 161.80 $ 127.27 194.77% 10.00% P2S, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
1 29 34 6 28 10 108 7,452.21 $ 101.28 $ 14,712.28 $ 2,226.58 $ 24,492.34 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
1 212 6 411.24 $ 5.59 $ 811.88 $ 122.87 $ 1,351.58 $
1 12 12 1 16 4 46 3,123.43 $ 42.45 $ 6,166.33 $ 933.22 $ 10,265.43 $ 8 10 1 2 4 25 1,770.82 $ 24.07 $ 3,495.98 $ 529.09 $ 5,819.96 $ 6 6 1 2 2 17 1,224.44 $ 16.64 $ 2,417.31 $ 365.84 $ 4,024.23 $ 1 214 8 511.04 $ 6.95 $ 1,008.90 $ 152.69 $ 1,679.58 $
1 212 6 411.24 $ 5.59 $ 811.88 $ 122.87 $ 1,351.58 $
1 37 64 7 65 13 41 16 29 20 293 18,254.85 $ 248.08 $ 36,039.03 $ 5,454.20 $ 59,996.16 $ 1 8 18 1 24 2 10 4 8 8 84 5,102.95 $ 69.35 $ 10,074.33 $ 1,524.66 $ 16,771.29 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
2 2 1 3 2 8 4 4 26 $ 21.78 1,602.46 $ 3,163.60 $ 478.78 $ 5,266.63 $ 16 32 2 20 4 12 4 12 8 110 6,976.68 $ 94.81 $ 13,773.48 $ 2,084.50 $ 22,929.47 $ 8 8 1 10 2 4 2 2 4 41 $ 35.56 2,616.64 $ 5,165.81 $ 781.80 $ 8,599.82 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
1 2 1 4 2 6 1 2 19 $ 15.04 1,106.38 $ 2,184.23 $ 330.56 $ 3,636.21 $ 2 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 13 $ 11.55 849.74 $ 1,677.57 $ 253.89 $ 2,792.74 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $

Page 32 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK

PEN (ELEC)
EN5 (ELEC)
DE5 (ELEC)
EN3 (PLUMB)
D3 (PLUMB)
DE5 (FP)
DE3 (FP)
EN5 (MECH)
DE3 (MECH)
CAD/BIM4 TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 496.92 $ 288.39 $ 235.08 $ 251.30 $ 161.80 $ 212.16 $ 149.32 $ 286.57 $ 161.80 $ 127.27 194.77% 10.00% P2S, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
9 34 3 10 3 10 7 76 5,035.85 $ 68.44 $ 9,941.86 $ 1,504.61 $ 16,550.76 $ 3 6 2 2 13 901.42 $ 12.25 $ 1,779.60 $ 269.33 $ 2,962.60 $ 2 12 1 4 1 4 4 28 1,769.96 $ 24.05 $ 3,494.28 $ 528.83 $ 5,817.13 $ 2 10 1 2 1 2 2 20 1,346.86 $ 18.30 $ 2,658.99 $ 402.42 $ 4,426.57 $ 2 6 1 2 1 2 1 15 1,017.61 $ 13.83 $ 2,008.98 $ 304.04 $ 3,344.46 $ 1 10 43 7 61 4,434.90 $ 60.27 $ 8,755.45 $ 1,325.06 $ 14,575.69 $ 22 4 322.88 $ 4.39 $ 637.44 $ 96.47 $ 1,061.17 $
1 2 18 4 25 1,793.13 $ 24.37 $ 3,540.03 $ 535.75 $ 5,893.28 $ 2 12 2 16 1,126.38 $ 15.31 $ 2,223.72 $ 336.54 $ 3,701.95 $ 28 1 11 797.13 $ 10.83 $ 1,573.71 $ 238.17 $ 2,619.84 $ 11 2 161.44 $ 2.19 $ 318.72 $ 48.24 $ 530.59 $ 12 3 233.94 $ 3.18 $ 461.85 $ 69.90 $ 768.86 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
4 4 2 4 8 4 4 30 2,034.32 $ $ 27.65 $ 4,016.19 $ 607.82 $ 6,685.97 $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
4 4 2 4 8 4 4 30 2,034.32 $ 27.65 $ 4,016.19 $ 607.82 $ 6,685.97 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
1 8 8 6 6 2 2 2 35 2,595.29 $ $ 35.27 $ 5,123.67 $ 775.42 $ 8,529.65 $ - - $ - $ - $
1 8 8 6 6 2 2 2 35 2,595.29 $ 35.27 $ 5,123.67 $ 775.42 $ 8,529.65 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
40 30 8 36 8 10 4 8 2 146 9,964.16 $ $ 135.41 $ 19,671.41 $ 2,977.10 $ 32,748.08 $ - - $ - $ - $
40 30 8 36 8 10 4 8 2 146 9,964.16 $ 135.41 $ 19,671.41 $ 2,977.10 $ 32,748.08 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
6 163 294 32 149 31 51 29 47 78 880
$ 47,007.55 2,981.50 $ 69,114.34 $ 8,041.45 $ 24,108.47 $ 6,576.90 $ 7,615.22 $ 8,310.65 $ 7,604.68 $ 9,926.98 $ 58,993.52 $ 801.72 $ 116,466.00 $ 17,626.12 $ $ 193,887.37

0.07% 1.13% 1.66% 0.19% 0.58% 0.16% 0.18% 0.20% 0.18% 0.24%

Page 33 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Andrew Fiscus, PE
Resident Engineer/Structures
Representative
Construction Engineer
Construction Inspector TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 205.70 $ 129.66 $ 168.56 135.75% 10.00%
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 180 80 80 340 23,477.60 $ $ 352.16 $ 32,348.90 $ 5,617.87 $ 61,796.54 180 80 80 340 23,477.60 $ 352.16 $ 32,348.90 $ 5,617.87 $ 61,796.54 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
180 80 80 340 23,477.60 $ 352.16 $ 32,348.90 $ 5,617.87 $ 61,796.54 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

UNICO ENGINEERING (DBE)

Page 34 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

UNICO ENGINEERING (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

Page 35 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Andrew Fiscus, PE
Resident Engineer/Structures
Representative
Construction Engineer
Construction Inspector TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 205.70 $ 129.66 $ 168.56 135.75% 10.00%

UNICO ENGINEERING (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 180 80 80 340
$ 10,373.00 37,025.39 $ 13,484.90 $ 23,477.60 $ 352.16 $ 32,348.90 $ 5,617.87 $ $ 61,796.54

0.89% 0.25% 0.32%

Page 36 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Principal/ QA Review
Project Manager
Coastal Scientist
Project Engineer

CADD/GIS
AdminTOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 310.18 $ 245.14 $ 123.74 $ 141.46 $ 104.62 $ 126.22 182.63% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ GHD

Page 37 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

CADD/GIS
AdminTOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 310.18 $ 245.14 $ 123.74 $ 141.46 $ 104.62 $ 126.22 182.63% 10.00% GHD
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

Page 38 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Principal/ QA Review
Project Manager
Coastal Scientist
Project Engineer

CADD/GIS
AdminTOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 310.18 $ 245.14 $ 123.74 $ 141.46 $ 104.62 $ 126.22 182.63% 10.00% GHD
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
20 64 140 60 40 20 344 17,501.80 $ $ 131.26 $ 32,203.26 $ 4,983.63 $ 54,819.96 $ - - $ - $ - $
20 64 140 60 40 20 344 17,501.80 $ 131.26 $ 32,203.26 $ 4,983.63 $ 54,819.96 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 20 64 140 60 40 20 344
$ 15,688.90 6,203.56 $ 17,322.96 $ 8,487.38 $ 4,184.62 $ 2,524.45 $ 17,501.80 $ 131.26 $ 32,203.26 $ 4,983.63 $ $ 54,819.96

0.15% 0.38% 0.42% 0.20% 0.10% 0.06%

Page 39 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Mark Ramsey
Chris Hicks
Nan Hua
Sam Lo Grasso
Aliz Horvath TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 429.59 $ 270.36 $ 143.58 $ 322.36 $ 135.19 176.31% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 8 60 200 32 160 460 26,426.44 $ $ 46,592.46 $ 7,301.89 $ 80,320.79 $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 8 60 200 32 160 460 26,426.44 $ 46,592.46 $ 7,301.89 $ 80,320.79 $ 8 60 200 32 160 460 26,426.44 $ 46,592.46 $ 7,301.89 $ 80,320.79 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

MOTT MACDONALD

Page 40 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

MOTT MACDONALD
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

Page 41 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Mark Ramsey
Chris Hicks
Nan Hua
Sam Lo Grasso
Aliz Horvath TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 429.59 $ 270.36 $ 143.58 $ 322.36 $ 135.19 176.31% 10.00%

MOTT MACDONALD
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 8 60 200 32 160 460
$ 16,221.33 3,436.72 $ 28,716.34 $ 10,315.51 $ 21,630.88 $ 26,426.44 $ 46,592.46 $ 7,301.89 $ $ 80,320.79

0.08% 0.39% 0.69% 0.25% 0.52%

Page 42 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Steffen Turoff
Principal in Charge
Daniel Garcia
Walker Project Manager
Tania Schleck
TDM
Ellen Schwartz
Parking Planner
Kevin Waters
Parking Design
Efrain Gonzalez
Senior Technician
Jeff Weckstein
Traffic and Parking
Chrissy Nichols
Director Multi‐Modal
TOTAL

HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 167.48 $ 111.65 $ 111.65 $ 89.32 $ 129.51 $ 84.85 $ 133.98 $ 156.31 103.00% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 2,386 31,458.07 $ $ 522,929.65 $ - - $ - $ - $ 76 21,031.94 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 34 8,803.37 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 488 110,928.45 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 316 71,797.02 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 140 47,171.63 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 1,332 $31,458.07 263,197.24 $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 15,743 137,901.25 $ $ 2,754,049.25 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 684 129,047.66 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 74 12,495.98 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 138 25,779.15 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 60 10,768.35 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 412 80,004.18 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 208 46,534.66 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 30 6,519.90 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 84 19,926.26 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 266 $6,156.25 56,137.80 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,050 $500.00 754,576.77 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 1,462 269,593.76 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 596 109,361.85 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 32 7,551.06 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 49 9,881.46 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 490 93,846.50 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 195 41,534.77 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 844 154,967.23 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 382 $500.00 67,840.13 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 8 2,283.47 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 4 1,141.73 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 4 1,141.73 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 489 $500.00 94,419.46 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 22 $500.00 5,861.92 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 217 38,157.61 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 160 30,105.72 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 8 1,682.55 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 16 3,278.15 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 42 10,521.98 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 14 2,910.87 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 10 1,900.67 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,168 306,070.06 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 268 45,984.52 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 349 47,687.19 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 556 78,827.81 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 190 27,346.27 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 185 26,108.05 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 181 25,373.50 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 415 54,728.11 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 357 47,607.29 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 223 31,235.13 $

WALKER CONSULTANTS
GRAND
TOTAL
HOURS

GRAND TOTAL

OTHER DIRECT
COSTS

GRAND TOTAL
COST

Page 43 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 167.48 $ 111.65 $ 111.65 $ 89.32 $ 129.51 $ 84.85 $ 133.98 $ 156.31 103.00% 10.00%

WALKER CONSULTANTS
GRAND
TOTAL
HOURS

GRAND TOTAL

OTHER DIRECT
COSTS

GRAND TOTAL
COST
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,074 149,801.48 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 104 15,022.81 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 104 15,022.81 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 96 13,340.26 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 94 12,973.70 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 166 22,017.43 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 92 12,402.83 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 92 12,402.83 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 96 13,244.11 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 92 12,402.83 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 20 4,092.21 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 118 16,879.63 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 609 84,812.79 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 214 29,006.05 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 86 12,294.67 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 73 10,002.19 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 103 14,103.42 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 51 7,316.11 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 32 4,969.55 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 50 7,120.81 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,320 $118,750.00 316,132.21 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 1,320 $118,750.00 316,132.21 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 785 101,442.76 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 705 90,746.52 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 80 10,696.24 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 918 155,083.54 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 180 28,513.30 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 46 6,885.98 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 272 52,606.62 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 192 27,167.37 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 45 9,612.72 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 60 11,985.23 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 123 18,312.33 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 351 71,954.32 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 88 17,612.57 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 2 420.64 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 30 6,107.90 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 142 29,419.32 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 45 9,441.09 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 4 841.28 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 23 4,477.49 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 17 3,634.02 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,416 $1,500.00 236,499.99 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 12 2,920.43 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 480 96,266.18 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 816 $1,500.00 115,896.86 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 40 8,532.96 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 68 12,883.56 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $

Page 44 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Steffen Turoff
Principal in Charge
Daniel Garcia
Walker Project Manager
Tania Schleck
TDM
Ellen Schwartz
Parking Planner
Kevin Waters
Parking Design
Efrain Gonzalez
Senior Technician
Jeff Weckstein
Traffic and Parking
Chrissy Nichols
Director Multi‐Modal
TOTAL

HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 167.48 $ 111.65 $ 111.65 $ 89.32 $ 129.51 $ 84.85 $ 133.98 $ 156.31 103.00% 10.00%

WALKER CONSULTANTS
GRAND
TOTAL
HOURS

GRAND TOTAL

OTHER DIRECT
COSTS

GRAND TOTAL
COST
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 456 $290.00 76,890.12 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 56 $290.00 9,681.10 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 324 50,599.81 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 76 16,609.22 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 200 36,140.51 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 17 3,803.87 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 28 5,817.13 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 20 4,426.57 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 135 22,092.93 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 409 68,153.05 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 124 18,607.82 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 145 23,439.92 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 48 9,278.41 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 31 6,057.06 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 26 5,193.67 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 35 5,576.16 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 218 $10,205.00 41,622.44 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 146 $10,205.00 32,103.99 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 72 9,518.45 $ 93 180 130 157 36 43 33 37 709 37,047.00 $ $ 38,158.41 $ 7,520.54 $ 9,613.02 $ 92,338.97 1,088 9,753.65 $ $ 268,456.50 $ - - $ - $ - $ 48 9,704.74 $
93 180 130 157 36 43 33 37 709 37,047.00 $ 38,158.41 $ 7,520.54 $ 9,613.02 $ 92,338.97 $ 914 $9,753.65 233,046.91 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 36 7,180.90 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 36 7,180.90 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 54 11,343.04 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 88 $ ‐ $ 19,733.97 $ - - $ - $ - $ 88 19,733.97 $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 1,644 28,950.00 $ $ 222,202.18 $ - - $ - $ - $ 274 $10,000.00 49,579.38 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 45 3,816.69 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 235 $8,000.00 38,861.32 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 110 $5,000.00 18,753.01 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 185 $300.00 20,521.97 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 300 $3,000.00 29,652.11 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 155 $650.00 16,020.25 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 130 13,610.69 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 210 $2,000.00 31,386.77 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 187 $ ‐ $ 39,049.99 $ - - $ - $ - $ 30 6,279.54 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 101 21,437.25 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 46 8,863.46 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 10 2,469.75 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 1,762 $ ‐ $ 331,978.47 $ - - $ - $ - $ 476 80,426.13 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 1,134 224,162.75 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 100 15,551.62 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 52 11,837.98 $ 93 180 130 157 36 43 33 37 709 22,898
$ 20,097.00 15,575.18 $ 14,514.50 $ 14,023.24 $ 4,662.50 $ 3,648.72 $ 4,421.34 $ 5,783.47 $ 37,047.00 $ 38,158.41 $ 7,520.54 $ 9,613.02 $ $ 92,338.97 $ 208,062.97 $ 4,158,400.00

0.37% 0.48% 0.35% 0.34% 0.11% 0.09% 0.11% 0.14%

Page 45 of 45 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Project No. BHLO-5107(033) Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate* Total
Principal in Charge STAFF 6 130.00 $ 780.00 $
QA/QC Manager STAFF 120 115.00 $ 13,800.00 $
Project Manager Tim Osterkamp, PE* 820 95.00 $ 77,900.00 $ Bridge Project Engineer Rob Burns, SE* 594 86.00 $ 51,084.00 $ Roadway Project Engineer Eric Espinoza, PE* 858 65.00 $ 55,770.00 $ Electrical Project Engineer Joe Ostdiek, PE, TE* 672 70.00 $ 47,040.00 $ Environmental Lead Amy Bakker 213 51.00 $ 10,863.00 $
Senior Bridge Engineer 2 STAFF 376 82.00 $ 30,832.00 $
Senior Roadway Engineer 2 STAFF 194 80.00 $ 15,520.00 $ Senior Bridge Engineer 1 STAFF 552 74.00 $ 40,848.00 $
Senior Roadway Engineer 1 STAFF 522 67.00 $ 34,974.00 $ Associate Bridge Engineer 2 STAFF 724 60.00 $ 43,440.00 $ Associate Roadway Engineer 2 STAFF 340 60.00 $ 20,400.00 $ Associate Bridge Engineer 1 STAFF 780 55.00 $ 42,900.00 $ Associate Roadway Engineer 1 STAFF 1,182 52.00 $ 61,464.00 $ Assistant Bridge Engineer 2 STAFF 500 47.00 $ 23,500.00 $ Assistant Roadway Engineer 2 STAFF 275 47.00 $ 12,925.00 $ Assistant Bridge Engineer 1 STAFF 44 38.00 $ 1,672.00 $ Assistant Roadway Engineer 1 STAFF 2899 38.00 $ 110,162.00 $ Senior CAD STAFF 756 71.00 $ 53,676.00 $
CAD/Detailer STAFF 372 49.00 $ 18,228.00 $
Engineering Technician STAFF 0 34.00 $ - $
Environmental Manager STAFF 55 80.00 $ 4,400.00 $
Senior Environmental Planner STAFF 234 57.00 $ 13,338.00 $ Associate Environmental Planner STAFF 158 49.00 $ 7,742.00 $ Environmental Planner STAFF 199 32.00 $ 6,368.00 $
Right of Way Manager STAFF 0 69.00 $ - $
Senior Right of Way Agent STAFF 0 56.00 $ - $
Right of Way Agent STAFF 0 34.00 $ - $
Funding Assistance STAFF 0 100.00 $ - $
13,445

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 799,626.00
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $15,737.72
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 815,363.72

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 95.41% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 777,938.52 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 0.00% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] - $
h) General and Administrative (Rate: 72.46% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] 590,812.55 $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 1,368,751.08 FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 218,411.48 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Field Visit 1 LS 500.00 $ 500.00 $
Design Coordination 1 LS 31,458.07 $ 31,458.07 $
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 31,958.07
$35.00 - $55.00
$35.00 - $55.00
$60.00 - $90.00
$60.00 - $90.00
$46.00 - $66.00
$48.00 - $68.00
$48.00 - $68.00
Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
$40.00 - $65.00
$29.00 - $49.00
$50.00 - $70.00
$32.00 - $52.00
Range
$100.00 - $150.00
$100.00 - $150.00
$85.00 - $115.00
$50.00 - $80.00
$60.00 - $90.00
$32.00 - $52.00
$50.00 - $80.00
$30.00 - $60.00
$70.00 - $100.00
$70.00 - $100.00
$60.00 - $90.00
$50.00 - $70.00
$18.00 - $38.00
$70.00 - $100.00
$46.00 - $66.00
$34.00 - $54.00
$30.00 - $50.00
$70.00 - $100.00
$85.00 - $115.00
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 4 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) • ARELLANO ASSOCIATES (DBE) $ 215,452.69
• BURNE ENGINEERING (DBE) $ 338,077.78
• DUDEK $ 74,215.25
• EARTH MECHANICS, INC. (DBE) $ 314,990.48
• GEOCON WEST, INC. $ 30,571.66
• GUIDA SURVEYING $ 98,478.99
• ICF JONES & STOKES, INC. $ 80,171.63
• MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC. $ 88,793.55
• P2S, INC. $ 193,887.37
• UNICO ENGINEERING (DBE) $ 61,796.54
• GHD $ 54,819.96
• MOTT MACDONALD $ 80,320.79
• WALKER CONSULTANTS $ 92,338.97
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ 1,723,915.66
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 1,755,873.73 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 4,158,400.00
*Employees will be billed at their actual pay rates within the ranges specified above. When actual rates change, employees will be billed at their updated rate.

NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

Page 2 of 4 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $59.47 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $61.26 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $63.10 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $64.99 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $66.94 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 13,445 = 6723 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 13,445 = 5378 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 13,445 = 672 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 13,445 = 672 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 13,445 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 13,445
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 6723 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 5378 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 672 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 672 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $799,626.00 13,445

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $59.47
$61.26
$63.10
$64.99

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

50.0%

40.0%

5.0%

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year
$799,626.00
$15,737.72

1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
$64.99 $43,688.65
$66.94 $0.00
$815,363.72
$59.47 $399,813.00
$61.26 $329,445.91
$63.10 $42,416.16

Page 3 of 4 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: ARELLANO ASSOCIATES
Project No. BHLO-5107(033) Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Project Manager Margaret Meadows 325 65.00 $ 21,125.00 $ Senior Project Coordinator Thomas Reese 345 43.00 $ 14,835.00 $ Senior Project Coordinator Matt Evans 424 40.00 $ 16,960.00 $ Tech Lead Sohrab Mikanik 2 70.00 $ 140.00 $
Creative Lead Kyle Santiago 152 55.00 $ 8,360.00 $
Project Coordinator Issac Chavez 444 24.00 $ 10,656.00 $ 1,692

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 72,076.00
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $3,308.77
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 75,384.77

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 0.00% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] - $ f) Overhead (Rate: 124.91% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 94,163.12 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 94,163.12
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 16,954.79 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Printed Materials 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
Postage/Mailings 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
Parcel Data 1 LS $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00
Translation/Interpretation-Spanish 1 LS $ 500.00 $ 500.00 Helpline 1 LS $ 150.00 $ 150.00
Web services/assets 1 LS $ 300.00 $ 300.00
Photo/Video Outside Services 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Pop-up event rentals/misc. 12 EACH $ 250.00 $ 3,000.00
Transportation/Parking 50 EACH $ 10.00 $ 500.00
Mileage 2400 MILES 0.625 $ 1,500.00 $
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 28,950.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 28,950.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 215,452.69
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
Range
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $42.60 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $43.88 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $45.19 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $46.55 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $47.94 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 1,692 = 423 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 1,692 = 423 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 1,692 = 423 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 1,692 = 423 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 1,692 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 1,692
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 423 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 423 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 423 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 423 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $72,076.00 1,692

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $42.60
$43.88
$45.19
$46.55

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

25.0%

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year
$72,076.00
$3,308.77

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
$46.55 $19,689.85
$47.94 $0.00
$75,384.77
$42.60 $18,019.00
$43.88 $18,559.57
$45.19 $19,116.36

Page 2 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 5851 Pine Avenue, Suite A, Chino Hills, CA 91709 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Public outreach, communications, stakeholder engagement I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).

Genoveva L. Arellano Principal
[email protected] 909.627.2974
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
Certification of Direct Costs:

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3

Page 3 of 3 ends

January 2020
June 19, 2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: BURNE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.

Project No. BHLO-5107(033) Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
QA/QC Manager Lori Burne 220 73.00 $ 16,060.00 $
Sr Bridge Engineer Molly Iley 509 68.00 $ 34,612.00 $
Staff Engineer I STAFF 72 40.00 $ 2,880.00 $
Staff Engineer II Michael Capili 576 35.00 $ 20,160.00 $ Assisstant Engineer STAFF 145 25.00 $ 3,625.00 $
Sr CADD Technician STAFF 320 70.00 $ 22,400.00 $
Drafting Technician II STAFF 214 31.25 $ 6,687.50 $
Drafting Technician I STAFF 0 25.00 $ - $
Admin/Clerical STAFF 18 25.00 $ 450.00 $
2,074

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 106,874.50
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $1,452.42
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 108,326.92

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 34.65% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 37,535.28 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 147.39% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 159,663.05 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 197,198.33
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 30,552.53 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Travel - Site Visit 4 Flight 200.00 $ 800.00 $
Travel - Site Visit 4 Hotel 200.00 $ 800.00 $
Travel - Site Visit 10 Meals 40.00 $ 400.00 $
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 2,000.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 2,000.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 338,077.78
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
Range
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $51.53 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $53.08 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $54.67 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $56.31 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $58.00 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 2,074 = 1348 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 2,074 = 519 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 2,074 = 207 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 2,074 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 2,074 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 2,074
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 1348 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 519 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 207 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. $51.53 $69,468.43
$53.08 $27,520.18
$54.67 $11,338.32
$56.31 $0.00
$58.00 $0.00
$108,326.92
$106,874.50
$1,452.42

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

65.0%

25.0%

10.0%

0.0%

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $51.53
$53.08
$54.67
$56.31
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $106,874.50 2,074

Page 2 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**:

Signature:

Email**:

Address:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Certification of Direct Costs:

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

Lori Burne
[email protected]
Title**: President
Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Phone Number: 530.672.1600
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

Page 3 of 3 ends

January 2020
5137 Golden Foothill Pkwy, Ste 100, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 06/20/2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: DUDEK
Project No. BHLO-5107(033) Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Jason Reynolds, Director STAFF 54 $ 96.60 $ 5,216.40
Sarah Richmond, Spec. V STAFF 85 $ 55.00 $ 4,675.00
Carolyn Groves, Spec. II STAFF 280 $ 42.09 $ 11,785.20
GIS Analyst III, TBD STAFF 36 $ 42.50 $ 1,530.00
Technical Editor II, TBD STAFF 30 $ 37.50 $ 1,125.00
Pubs Spec. II, TBD STAFF 23 $ 33.25 $ 764.75
508

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 25,096.35
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $644.47
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 25,740.82

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 56.24% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 14,476.64 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 105.37% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 27,123.11 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 41,599.75
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 6,734.06 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Mileage 225 miles 0.625 $ $ 140.63
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 140.63
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 140.63 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 74,215.25
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
December 29, 2022

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
Range
$29.76 - $33.53
$36.33 - $43.56
$21.00 - $40.87
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $49.40 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $50.88 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $52.41 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $53.98 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $55.60 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 508 = 178 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 508 = 229 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 508 = 102 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 508 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 508 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 508
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 178 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 229 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 102 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $25,096.35 508

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $49.40
$50.88
$52.41
$53.98

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

35.0%

45.0%

20.0%

0.0%

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year
$25,096.35
$644.47

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
$53.98 $0.00
$55.60 $0.00
$25,740.82
$49.40 $8,783.72
$50.88 $11,632.16
$52.41 $5,324.94

Page 2 of 3 ends

Project No. BHLO-5107(033) Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Project Manager Eric Brown 91 97.70 $ 8,890.70 $
Principal Engineer Hubert Law 14 97.70 $ 1,367.80 $
Senior Engineer Pat Wilson 28 69.30 $ 1,940.40 $
Senior Project Geologist Michael Hoshiyama 96 60.60 $ 5,817.60 $ Project Engineer Dane Nicklaus 96 51.10 $ 4,905.60 $
Senior Staff Engineer Bernardo Ambriz 372 47.00 $ 17,484.00 $ Staff Engineer Doug Brown 393 33.60 $ 13,204.80 $
Senior Technican Kiat Kaekul 121 50.40 $ 6,098.40 $
Technican Edson Amaro 105 26.00 $ 2,730.00 $
Admin Veronica Cheang 0 24.90 $ - $
1,316

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 62,439.30
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $1,512.68
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 63,951.98

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 88.05% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 56,309.72 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 90.91% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 58,138.74 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 114,448.46
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 17,840.04 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Utility Location 16 HOUR 250.00 $ 4,000.00 $
Drill Rig Rental 13 DAY 4,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $
Traffic Control 12 DAY 2,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $
Drum Testing and Disposal 30 DRUM 375.00 $ 11,250.00 $
Lab Testing 1 LS 13,500.00 $ 13,500.00 $
Permit Fees 1 LS 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $
Misc Drilling Expenses 1 LS 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 118,750.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 118,750.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 314,990.48
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
Range
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $47.45 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $48.87 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $50.34 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $51.85 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $53.40 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 1,316 = 526 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 1,316 = 592 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 1,316 = 132 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 1,316 = 66 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 1,316 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 1,316
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 526 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 592 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 132 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 66 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $62,439.30 1,316

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $47.45
$48.87
$50.34
$51.85

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

40.0%

45.0%

10.0%

5.0%

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year
$62,439.30
$1,512.68

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
$51.85 $3,411.46
$53.40 $0.00
$63,951.98
$47.45 $24,975.72
$48.87 $28,940.62
$50.34 $6,624.19

Page 2 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 17800 Newhope Street, Suite B, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Geotechnical
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

Eric Brown Principal
[email protected] 714.751.3826
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
Certification of Direct Costs:

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3

Page 3 of 3 ends

January 2020
6/20/23
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: GEOCON WEST, INC.

Project No. BHLO-5107(033) Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Associate STAFF 3 82.40 $ 247.20 $
Senior Engineer/Geologist STAFF 17 68.69 $ 1,167.74 $
Asbestos Consultant STAFF 48 48.53 $ 2,329.44 $
Staff Engineer/Geologist STAFF 28 30.96 $ 866.93 $
Staff (PW) STAFF 24 58.38 $ 1,401.13 $
Technical Typist/Drafting STAFF 14 25.75 $ 360.50 $
Industrial Hygienist STAFF 2 61.80 $ 123.60 $
136

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 6,496.54
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $0.00
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 6,496.54

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 59.79% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 3,884.28 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 61.30% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 3,982.38 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 63.91% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] 4,151.94 $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 12,018.60
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 1,851.51 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Lab - ACM PLM 88 Each 25.00 $ 2,200.00 $
Lab - ACM Point Count 10 Each 55.00 $ 550.00 $
Lab - Paint Total Lead 12 Each 30.00 $ 360.00 $
Lab - Paint WET or TCLP 12 Each 85.00 $ 1,020.00 $
Lab - Soil Total Lead 40 Each 30.00 $ 1,200.00 $
Lab - Soil WET or TCLP 50 Each 85.00 $ 4,250.00 $
Travel Expense 2 Day 150.00 $ 300.00 $
PPE/Equipment 1 Day 25.00 $ 25.00 $
GPS Unit 1 Day 150.00 $ 150.00 $
Work Truck 1 Day 150.00 $ 150.00 $
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 10,205.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 10,205.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 30,571.66
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
Range
$82.40 - $82.40
$56.00 - $75.00
$43.25 - $51.75
$25.75 - $25.75
$26.00 - $34.00
$58.38 - $58.38
$61.80 - $61.80
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $47.77 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $49.20 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $50.68 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $52.20 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $53.76 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 136 = 136 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 136 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 136 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 136 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 136 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 136
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 136 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $6,496.54 136

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $47.77
$49.20
$50.68
$52.20

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) 100.0%

0.0%

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year
$6,496.54
$0.00

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
$52.20 $0.00
$53.76 $0.00
$6,496.54
$47.77 $6,496.54
$49.20 $0.00
$50.68 $0.00

Page 2 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 3303 N. San Fernando Blvd, Suite 100, Burbank, CA 91504 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

William Lydon CFO
[email protected] 858.558.6900
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
Certification of Direct Costs:

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3

Page 3 of 3 ends

January 2020
06/23/2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: GUIDA SURVEYING, INC.

Project No. BHLO-5107(033) Contract No. Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Survey Manager Lisa Spivak, PLS 24 $ 101.00 $ 2,424.00
Sr. Project Surveyor Justin Height, PLS 20 $ 76.00 $ 1,520.00 Project Surveyor Project Surveyor 16 $ 70.00 $ 1,120.00 Sr. Survey Analyst Sr. Survey Analyst 40 $ 55.00 $ 2,200.00 Survey Analyst Survey Analyst 76 $ 50.00 $ 3,800.00
Survey Technician Survey Technician 40 $ 40.00 $ 1,600.00 Project Coordinator Project Coordinator 0 $ 36.00 $ -
PLS Party Chief** PLS Party Chief** 48 $ 68.26 $ 3,276.48 Certified Party Chief** Certified Party Chief** 90 $ 63.56 $ 5,720.40 Party Chief** Party Chief** 0 $ 59.51 $ -
Instrumentman** Instrumentman** 0 $ 54.86 $ -
Chainman** Chainman** 114 $ 54.28 $ 6,187.92
Apprentice(Avg)** Apprentice(Avg)** 24 $ 38.00 $ 912.00 492

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 28,760.80
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $0.00
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 28,760.80

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 88.07% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 25,329.64 f) Overhead (Rate: 103.75% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 29,839.33 h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 55,168.97
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 8,392.98 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Preliminary Title Reports 4 EA 1,500.00$ $ 6,000.00
Mileage 250 Mile 0.625$ $ 156.25
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 6,156.25
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 6,156.25 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 98,478.99
NOTES:
$55-$85
$25-$45
PW Rate
PW Rate
PW Rate
$45-$65
$40-$60
$30-$50
PW Rate

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
September 7, 2022

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - FINAL DESIGN
PW Rate
PW Rate
Range
$105-$125
$85-$95
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 4 ends

January 2020
TBD
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $58.46 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $60.21 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $62.02 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $63.88 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $65.79 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 492 = 492 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 492 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 492 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 492 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 492 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 492
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 492 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. $63.88 $0.00
$65.79 $0.00
$28,760.80
$58.46 $28,760.80
$60.21 $0.00
$62.02 $0.00
$28,760.80
$0.00

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) 100.0%

0.0%

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $58.46
$60.21
$62.02
$63.88
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $28,760.80 492

Page 2 of 4 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
12/28/2022
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3
Certification of Direct Costs:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Survey and Mapping Services
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

Bernie McInally, PLS Executive Vice President
[email protected] 949-777-2041
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
220 Commerce, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92602

Page 3 of 4 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc.

Project No. Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Senior Consultant III Jessica Feldman 32 $ 55.52 $ 1,776.64 Project Director John Heller 158 $ 75.00 $ 11,850.00
Associate Consultant II Molly Iker-Johnson 200 $ 38.46 $ 7,692.00 Associate Consultant II Milagros Mujica 66 $ 36.06 $ 2,379.96 Senior Consultant II Brittany Buscombe 14 $ 49.12 $ 687.68 Senior Consultant III Elizabeth Irvin 32 $ 54.09 $ 1,730.88 Associate Consultant II Jenelle Mountain-Castro 14 $ 45.31 $ 634.34 516

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 26,751.50
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $977.57
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 27,729.07

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 40.17% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 11,138.77 f) Overhead (Rate: 121.72% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 33,751.83 h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 44,890.59
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 7,261.97 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Mileage 464 mile $ 0.625 $ 290.00
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 290.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 290.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 80,171.63
NOTES:
$34.00 - $40.94
$50.80 - $58.04
$34.00 - $40.94
$47.80 - $50.70
$34.00 - $40.94

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
Range
$50.80 - $58.04
$70.02 - $101.67
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 4 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $51.84 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $53.40 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $55.00 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $56.65 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $58.35 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 516 = 155 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 516 = 155 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 516 = 155 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 516 = 52 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 516 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 516
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 155 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 155 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 155 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 52 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. $56.65 $2,923.21
$58.35 $0.00
$27,729.07
$51.84 $8,025.45
$53.40 $8,266.21
$55.00 $8,514.20
$26,751.50
$977.57

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

30.0%

10.0%

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $51.84
$53.40
$55.00
$56.65
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $26,751.50 516

Page 2 of 4 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
6/21/2023
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3
Certification of Direct Costs:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Provision of support to ensure that project design adheres to architectural history requirements set forth in the project's Environmental Commitments Record.

Katharine Muller Sr. Vice President
[email protected] 703.539.1750
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

Page 3 of 4 ends

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Principal Landscape Arch STAFF 36 84.18 $ 3,030.55 $
Senior Landscape Architect STAFF 55 56.95 $ 3,132.18 $
Irrigation Specialist STAFF 93 49.52 $ 4,605.58 $
Senior Landscape Designer STAFF 272 43.52 $ 11,836.76 $ Landscape Designer STAFF 198 29.87 $ 5,914.26 $
Project Accountant STAFF 41 39.61 $ 1,624.17 $
695

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 30,143.50
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $409.65
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 30,553.15

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 48.93% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 14,949.65 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 115.27% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 35,218.61 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 50,168.27
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 8,072.14 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ -
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ - TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 88,793.55
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
Range
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $43.37 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $44.67 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $46.01 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $47.39 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $48.82 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 695 = 452 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 695 = 174 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 695 = 70 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 695 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 695 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 695
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 452 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 174 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 70 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. $47.39 $0.00
$48.82 $0.00
$30,553.15
$43.37 $19,593.27
$44.67 $7,761.95
$46.01 $3,197.92
$30,143.50
$409.65

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

65.0%

25.0%

10.0%

0.0%

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $43.37
$44.67
$46.01
$47.39
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $30,143.50 695

Page 2 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 617 West Seventh Street, Suite 304, Los Angeles, CA 90017 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3
Certification of Direct Costs:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Evan Mather, FASLA, PLA, SITES AP Principal, Director of Landscape Architecture [email protected] 213.694.3800
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

Page 3 of 3 ends

January 2020

6.21.2023
___________________________ ____________________________ Christopher J. Beynon Vice President, Chief Development Officer ________________ ______________ 510.812.0172 [email protected] DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: P2S Inc.

Project No. BHLO-5107(033) Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
PEN (ELEC) Aravind Batra* 6 153.25 $ 919.50 $
EN5 (ELEC) Marco Cabibbo 163 88.94 $ 14,497.22 $
DE5 (ELEC) Gary Jewell* 294 72.50 $ 21,315.00 $
EN3 (PLUMB) Rolando Domingo* 32 77.50 $ 2,480.00 $
D3 (PLUMB) Chad Peterson 149 49.90 $ 7,435.10 $
DE5 (FP) Quang Nguyen 31 65.43 $ 2,028.33 $
DE3 (FP) Hector Ramirez 51 46.05 $ 2,348.55 $
EN5 (MECH) Mike Shen 29 88.38 $ 2,563.02 $
DE3 (MECH) Zach Kell 47 49.90 $ 2,345.30 $
CAD/BIM4 John Voso 78 39.25 $ 3,061.50 $
880

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 58,993.52
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $801.72
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 59,795.24

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 62.26% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 37,229.77 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 132.51% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 79,236.23 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 116,466.00
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 17,626.12 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ -
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ - TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 193,887.37
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
$46.00 - $55.00
$33.00 - $40.00
Range
$90.00 - $160.00
$75.00 - $90.00
$60.00 - $72.00
$60.00 - $72.00
$60.00 - $68.00
$38.00 - $43.00
$46.00 - $55.00
$75.00 - $90.00
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $67.04 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $69.05 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $71.12 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $73.25 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $75.45 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 880 = 572 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 880 = 220 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 880 = 88 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 880 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 880 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 880
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 572 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 220 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 88 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $58,993.52 880

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $67.04
$69.05
$71.12
$73.25

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

65.0%

25.0%

10.0%

0.0%

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year
$58,993.52
$801.72

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
$73.25 $0.00
$75.45 $0.00
$59,795.24
$67.04 $38,345.79
$69.05 $15,190.83
$71.12 $6,258.62

Page 2 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 5000 E Spring St, Suite 800, Long Beach, CA 90815 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Kevin Peterson President
[email protected] 562.254.5131
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
Certification of Direct Costs:

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3

Page 3 of 3 ends

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Resident Engineer/Structures Representative Andrew Fiscus, PE 180 79.32 $ 14,277.60 $ Construction Engineer STAFF 80 50.00 $ 4,000.00 $
Construction Inspector STAFF 80 65.00 $ 5,200.00 $
340

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 23,477.60
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $352.16
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 23,829.76

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 0.00% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] - $ f) Overhead (Rate: 135.75% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 32,348.90 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 32,348.90
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 5,617.87 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ -
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ - TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 61,796.54
NOTES:

Range
$75.00 - $85.00
$45.00 - $55.00
$65.00 - $70.00

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $69.05 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $71.12 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $73.26 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $75.45 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $77.72 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 340 = 170 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 340 = 170 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 340 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 340 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 340 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 340
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 170 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 170 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. $69.05 $11,738.80
$71.12 $12,090.96
$73.26 $0.00
$75.45 $0.00
$77.72 $0.00
$23,829.76
$23,477.60
$352.16

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

50.0%

0.0%

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $69.05
$71.12
$73.26
$75.45

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $23,477.60 340
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

Page 2 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Certification of Direct Costs:

Constructability Review
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

Cesar Montes de Oca, PE President
[email protected] 916.900.6623
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
9275 Sky Park Court, Suite 160, San Diego, CA 92123

Page 3 of 3 ends

January 2020

06.19.2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: GHD
Project No. BHLO-5107(033) Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Principal / QA Review Craig Lewis 20 99.77 $ 1,995.40 $ Project Manager Aaron Holloway 64 78.85 $ 5,046.40 $
Coastal Scientist Braden Froble 140 39.80 $ 5,572.00 $
Project Engineer Una Savic 60 45.50 $ 2,730.00 $
CADD/GIS Ashlan Finn 40 33.65 $ 1,346.00 $
Admin Nicole Garza 20 40.60 $ 812.00 $
344

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 17,501.80
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $131.26
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 17,633.06

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 28.91% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 5,097.72 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 153.72% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 27,105.55 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 32,203.26
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 4,983.63 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ -
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ - TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 54,819.96
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
Range
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $50.88 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $52.40 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $53.98 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $55.60 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $57.26 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 344 = 258 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 344 = 86 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 344 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 344 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 344 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 344
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 258 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 86 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $17,501.80 344

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $50.88
$52.40
$53.98
$55.60

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

75.0%

25.0%

0.0%

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year
$17,501.80
$131.26

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
$55.60 $0.00
$57.26 $0.00
$17,633.06
$50.88 $13,126.35
$52.40 $4,506.71
$53.98 $0.00

Page 2 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 655 Montgomery Street, #1010, San Francisco, CA 94111 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Coastal science & engineering in support of the CCC permit process I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

Craig Lewis Principal / Vice President
[email protected] 415.350.8337
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
Certification of Direct Costs:

EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3

Page 3 of 3 ends

January 2020
06/23/2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Project Principal
Senior Engineer
Project Engineer
Principal Project Manager
Project Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: WALKER CONSULTANTS
Project No. BHLO-5107(033) Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Principal in Charge Steffen Turoff 93 75.00 $ 6,975.00 $ Walker Project Manager Daniel Garcia 180 50.00 $ 9,000.00 $ TDM Tania Schleck 130 50.00 $ 6,500.00 $
Parking Planner Ellen Schwartz 157 40.00 $ 6,280.00 $
Parking Design Kevin Waters 36 58.00 $ 2,088.00 $
Senior Technician Efrain Gonzalez 43 38.00 $ 1,634.00 $ Traffic and Parking Jeff Weckstein 33 60.00 $ 1,980.00 $ Director Multi-Modal Chrissy Nichols 37 70.00 $ 2,590.00 $ 709

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 37,047.00
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $0.00
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 37,047.00

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 0.00% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] - $ f) Overhead (Rate: 103.00% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 38,158.41 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 38,158.41
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 7,520.54 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Estimated Expenses 1 LS 9,613.02 $ 9,613.02 $
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 9,613.02
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 9,613.02 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 92,338.97
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
Range
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
June 19, 2023

PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $52.25 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 3.0% = $53.82 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 3.0% = $55.43 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 3.0% = $57.10 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 3.0% = $58.81 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 709 = 709 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 709 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 709 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 709 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 709 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 709
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 709 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. $52.25 $37,047.00
$53.82 $0.00
$55.43 $0.00
$57.10 $0.00
$58.81 $0.00
$37,047.00
$37,047.00
$0.00

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)

0.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) 100.0%

0.0%

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $52.25
$53.82
$55.43
$57.10
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $37,047.00 709

Page 2 of 3 ends

January 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Certification of Direct Costs:

Page 3 of 3 ends

January 2020
707 Wilshire Blvd Suite 3650 Los Angeles, CA 90017 [email protected] 213 488-4911June 20, 2023 Principal Steffen Turoff DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Exhibit “C”
Project Schedule
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Project Schedule
Task Description Due Date
1 Notice to Proceed (anticipated) 7/10/23
2 35% Plan Submittal 10/6/23
3 65% PS&E Submittal 8/2/24
4 95% PS&E Submittal 11/8/24
5 Final PS&E Submittal 3/24/25
6 Obtain Coastal Commission Permit 2/24/25*
7 Begin Project Bidding 7/16/25*
8 Begin Construction 11/10/25*
9 Complete Construction 8/27/27*
*Dates for Tasks 6-9 are tentative and subject to change based on time required by the City, outside agencies, and the construction contractor.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Exhibit “D”
Key Personnel
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Key Personnel
Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
Pier Bridge Replacement Project
DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

RFP FOR A CALTRANS FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECT
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 11

KEY PERSONNEL
Dokken has developed a highly qualified full-service team to deliver all tasks necessary to see the Pier Bridge Replacement Project constructed a year prior to the 2028 Olympics. Each team member is available, committed, and excited to see this project through to construction. The qualifications of our teaming partners and key individuals are presented in this section.

Specialty Subconsultants
Dokken has partnered with the following subconsultants to provide the City a comprehensive team, capable of delivering every scope of work item under this contract. Each subconsultant was selected based on their experience and reputation providing excellent service to the City and similar agencies.

Burne Engineering Services, Inc.

Established in 2007, Burne Engineering Services,
Inc. (Burne Engineering) is a structural engineering
firm, specializing in the design of bridges and
buildings. The firm has provided structural design
for many hundreds of commercial and residential
building structures as well as Design Quality
Assurance Management for more than $100M in
state and federally funded transportation projects.

Burne Engineering also specializes in Quality
Assurance (QA) and Source Inspection Quality
Management Plans (SIQMPs) on large-scale projects
including the development of SIQMPs for Caltrans.

As a small, family-owned company, Burne
Engineering’s licensed engineers have been
designing bridges in reinforced and prestressed
concrete, timber, and steel for more than twenty
years. Delivered by a lean staff of 15 dedicated
employees, the firm’s project experience includes
design and construction support for all type of
transportation structures, pedestrian bridges, and
incidental structures. Burne Engineering’s relevant
project experience includes providing:
• Structural Engineer for building modifications for
Fixins Soul Food Restaurant, Sacramento, CA.
• Structural Engineer for new 4-story hotel,
Mackinaw Hotel, Placerville, CA.
• Structural Engineer, Placerville Old City Hall
Rehabilitation Study, Placerville, CA.
• Independent Bridge Design Check, Smith River
Bridge Detour, SR 101, Del Norte County,
Caltrans D59.

MIG, Inc.

MIG is recognized as leaders in delivering landscape
architectural design solutions that are artful, driven
by a compelling narrative, responsive to the site’s
natural and historic context, fiscally and
environmentally sustainable, community-driven,
and constructable.

Connection is what will drive the design for this
project – connecting and aligning with the values of
the community; connecting to the natural processes
of the larger ecosystem; and strong landscape
connections to emphasize the links between the
pier and the surrounding beachfront amenities.

MIG sees the Pier Bridge Replacement project as an
opportunity to create a new vibrant public open
space underneath the proposed structure. This new
space could incorporate new decorative hardscape,
vertical landscaping on the bridge columns, ample
lighting for safety and security, seating areas,
performance spaces, and public art. Additionally,
MIG will restore all existing landscape areas
impacted by construction, including at adjacent
Palisades Park.

MIG is has experience working with the City of
Santa Monica, including on the following projects:
• Santa Monica Airport Park
• Santa Monica Memorial Park
• Santa Monica City Services Building
• North Beach Park
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 12
Arellano Associates
Established in 1994, Arellano Associates (AA) is a
consulting firm specializing in communications and
public outreach, community and government
relations, and strategic planning and marketing
programs. AA has been working for more than two
decades to deliver marketing and community
outreach programs for some of Southern
California’s most important transportation, public
safety, sustainability, planning, and infrastructure
improvement projects. Their vision is to positively
impact communities through honest and
creative engagement using innovative
communication tools and techniques. AA’s
professionals provide comprehensive
communications and planning services for the full
spectrum of public projects from planning to
construction or implementation. AA also offers
specialized professional services geared toward
Latino and Spanish-speaking communities. AA is a
Limited Liability Corporation and is woman and
minority owned. AA is a certified Small Businessowned (SBE) and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE). AA operates out of a single office
in the City of Chino Hills and is comprised of a team
of 65 staff members.

Arellano Associates has performed outreach on the
following projects of similar size, scope, and/or
location as the Pier Bridge Replacement:
• City of Beverly Hills, North Portal Wilshire/Rodeo
Purple Line Extension
• City of Glendale, Riverwalk Bridge
• City of Los Angeles Westside Mobility Study
• City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles River Bike Path
• City of Santa Monica, Big Blue Bus
• LABOE 6th Street Viaduct Bridge
• Metro, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Project
• OCTA, OC Streetcar- Eat, Shop, Play Program
Earth Mechanics, Inc
Founded as a California Corporation in 1989, Earth
Mechanics, Inc. (EMI) is a geotechnical and
earthquake engineering consulting firm specializing
in major geotechnical site investigations and testing,
seismic hazard and earthquake retrofit evaluations,
and foundation design for projects related to
transportation infrastructure. With a staff of 36, EMI
has offices located throughout California. The
headquarters is in Fountain Valley, California in
Orange County. Other offices are in San Marcos,
Hayward, San Pedro, and San Bernardino.

In the City of Santa Monica, EMI provided
geotechnical services for all three phases of the
Beach Improvement Group (B.I.G.) project which
included the replacement of the California Incline
Viaduct, evaluation of the feasibility of
widening/retrofitting the Pier Bridge, and
replacement of the Idaho Avenue Pedestrian
Overcrossing the California Incline.

Other notable bridge projects in Los Angeles County
include the Sixth Street Viaduct Replacement,
the Riverside Drive Bridge, and the Schuyler
Heim Bridge. EMI’s pedestrian/bicycle bridge
projects in Southern California include the El Portal
Pedestrian Undercrossing, the Las Flores Creek
Pedestrian Bridge, and the Kelvin Avenue
Pedestrian Bridge. EMI has provided geotechnical
services for over 50 HBP bridges including the El
Camino Real Bridge Replacement and the Buckman
Springs Widening/Replacement.

EMI’s services included review of available
geotechnical and seismic data, field exploration and
soil laboratory testing, seismic evaluation
(liquefaction, seismic settlements, slope
deformation, axial and lateral pile evaluations),
foundation design, report preparation, and
construction support.

Geocon Consultants, Inc. (Geocon) is a California
Corporation established in 1971 as a professional
engineering consulting firm providing comprehensive
geotechnical engineering, environmental consulting,
materials testing, and special inspection services for
over 51 years. We employ over 300 technically strong
and highly motivated engineers, geologists,
environmental scientists, and technicians.

State-of-the-art geotechnical and materials testing
laboratories, extensive inventories of field equipment
and instrumentation, comprehensive technical
libraries, and advanced data-management systems,
support each office. Geocon operates California
offices in Sacramento (Rancho Cordova), Fairfield,
Livermore, Los Angeles (Burbank), Murrieta,
Redlands, La Quinta, Irvine, and San Diego.

Geocon provides the following services to clients
throughout the state:
 Geotechnical Engineering
 Engineering Geology
 Environmental Consulting
 Hazardous Materials Site Investigations,
Remediation, Structure Surveys
 Environmental Contracting
 Construction Materials Testing
(Field and Laboratory)
 Special Inspection (DSA, ACI, CWI, ICC, PTI)
Dokken and Geocon have delivered over 140
projects together in the past 15 years, including
but not limited to:
• 5th Street over Feather River HBP Bridge
Replacement in Yuba City, CA
• SR-132 West Freeway/Expressway in Modesto, CA
• Indian Canyon Road Widening and Bridge
Replacement in Palm Springs, CA
• SR-111/66th Avenue New Grade Separation over
UPRR in Riverside County
• 9 HBP Bridge Replacements in Nevada County
• Marsh Street HBP Bridge Replacement in
San Luis Obispo, CA
• I-10/605 Interchange Design Build in
Baldwin Park, CA
Guida Surveying, Inc.

Guida Surveying, Inc. (Guida) is an SBE-certified,
multi-disciplined land surveying firm that has
provided project-based and on-call geomatics
services throughout California since 1995. Guida
has a long history of providing skilled surveyors,
field crews, and office personnel who have
significantly contributed to this region’s
infrastructure growth. The firm offers a depth of
staffing resources which can provide flexibility to
accommodate working off hours, variable days, and
locations, if needed.

Guida has provided land surveying and mapping
services on a variety of design and construction
bridge and roadway projects throughout Southern
California within the last 5 years including, but not
limited to:
• Pier Bridge Replacement TSR, Santa Monica, CA
• Camino Cielo Bridge Replacement, Phase 2 Final
Design, Castro Valley, CA
• I-215/McCall Road Interchange, Menifee, CA
• Port of Los Angeles, SR-47/Vincent Thomas
Bridge and Front Street/Harbor Boulevard
Interchange Reconfiguration, Los Angeles, CA
• Shoemaker Bridge Replacement, Long Beach, CA
• Jeffrey Open Space Trail/I-5 Bicycle and
Pedestrian Bridge Project, Irvine, CA
Guida’s team has expansive experience providing a
full suite of land surveying and mapping services,
delivering quality and innovative products on time
and within budget. The firm utilizes a unique blend
of traditional methodologies with new and
innovative technologies for the creation and
delivery of highly accurate work products. These
tools are utilized to increase effectiveness of field
data collection, enhance safety for field crews and
the community, and ensure final deliverables meet
a high standard of quality control. Guida is proud to
invest in the latest technology for the assessment of
critical infrastructure including roadways/highways,
structures, utilities, and environmental
surroundings.

For 31 years, P2S Inc. has brought innovative and
sustainable engineering solutions to clients
throughout the west coast. From mechanical,
electrical, plumbing and lighting design, to
commissioning and construction management
services, P2S takes a holistic, performance-based
approach to every single project they undertake.

That means they don’t just find a solution that
works, they find a solution that works for each
individual client.

P2S offers mechanical, electrical, plumbing, lighting,
and telecommunications system design services.

What’s more, their diverse team has worked with
almost every kind of municipal structure, including
bridges, parks, pools, civic centers, theaters, fire
stations and more. The P2S experts are ready to
support the City’s development goals.

The P2S team is skilled in complying with regulatory
requirements, careful planning and following
specifications. They’ve provided engineering
services as well as interior and exterior lighting
designs and controls for restrooms, parking lots,
streets, walkways, and other high-use spaces. Their
municipal designs make effective use of project
footprints and satisfy the needs of the cities they
work with. Relevant experience of P2S includes:
• Electrical design for the Oceanfront Walk
pedestrian path and bike trail in Santa Monica,
CA
• Lighting & Utility Design for the UC San Diego
New Gillman Bridge over I-5 in La Jolla, CA
• MEPT design for the new 2-story Mt. San
Antonio College Bookstore and Pedestrian
Bridge in Walnut, CA
ICF, Inc.

Founded in 1969, ICF is a leading multidisciplinary
land use, transportation, environmental, and
cultural resources services firm providing
comprehensive environmental planning services to
public and private clients throughout the western
United States. ICF specializes in the analysis of
environmental issues, regulatory compliance, and
the preparation of planning documents prescribed
by federal, state, and local regulations, including
NEPA, CEQA, and Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). ICF has extensive
experience performing design review on a wide
variety of projects, including evaluation for
compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s
Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties
(SOIS) and implementing mitigation plans.

ICF’s Southern California team has decades of
experience in historic preservation and wellestablished working relationships with regulatory agencies throughout the region. Their staff includes
architectural historians, archaeologists, historic
architects, historians, and historic preservation
specialists, all of whom meet or exceed the
Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification
Standards in their respective fields. ICF has a
successful track record of completing projects on
time, demonstrated by their history of providing
consistent quality service to their many on-call and
repeat clients. ICF’s relevant project experience
includes:
• Manchester Jr. Arts Center/Vision Theatre | Los
Angeles Bureau of Engineering, Los Angeles, CA
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development NHPA Section 106 Review | City of
Los Angeles Housing Department, Los Angeles,
CA
• Bateson Building | Department of General
Services, Real Estate Division, Sacramento, CA
• Transit Shed at Berths 180-181 and Storage
Shed at Berth 155A | Port of Los Angeles, Los
Angeles Harbor Department, Los Angeles, CA
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 15
Dudek
Dudek is a California-based environmental and
engineering consulting firm with offices nationwide
staffed by more than 700 environmental
practitioners, planners, scientists, civil engineers,
contractors, and technical experts. With analyses
based on science and ethics, Dudek offers solutions
that encompass the project lifecycle and anticipate
future needs. Their professionals find practical,
cost-effective approaches to help project owners
achieve their project-specific and overall goals.

Dudek is a recognized expert in coastal planning
and development permitting strategy. As an
integrated member of the Dokken team, Dudek will
leverage their work on high-profile public and
private projects in California’s coastal zone. In
support of this project Dudek will take maximum
advantage of their established leadership role in
coastal environmental planning, applying their
expertise in processing Coastal Development
Permits (CDP) across multiple project types,
including Public Work Plans and Local Coastal
Program (LCP) amendments, along with local
agency piers and marine safety center projects. The
City of Santa Monica will benefit from Dudek’s
experienced professionals facilitating project
planning, navigating resource agency approvals,
completing environmental documentation,
conducting public outreach, and representing
projects at local and state hearings. Dudek’s
relevant project experience includes:
• Oceanside Pier View Way - Pier
Replacement/Retrofit Project CDP
• Encinitas Moonlight Beach Marine Safety Center
CDP
• I-5 North Coast Corridor Public Work Plan /
Transportation and Resource Enhancement
Program
• San Mateo County Harbor District Master Plan
Development
• Dana Point Harbor Hotels SLR Planning
• Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority One
Water One Watershed Plan Update 2018
UNICO Engineering, Inc.

Established in 2013, UNICO Engineering (UNICO) is a
certified DBE firm that is fully committed to
providing high quality construction management,
engineering, and land surveying services to public
and private clients. UNICO serves clients throughout
California with a current staff of over 80 from their
corporate office located in Folsom, with branch
offices in Oakland and San Diego. UNICO offers:
• Construction Management
• Bridge, Roadway, Electrical, Facilities, Water and
Sewer Inspection
• Value Engineering
• Office Engineering and Labor Compliance
• Construction Staking and Verification
• Drone Surveying
UNICO’s Resident Engineers and Structures
Representatives are graduates of the Caltrans
Resident Engineer Academy and have worked on
the replacement, rehabilitation, and retrofit of
signature structures throughout California. UNICO’s
structures expertise includes:
• Falsework Submittal Review
• Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossings
• Cast-in-Place, Post-Tensioned Box Girder Bridges
• Pre-Cast, Pre-Stressed Girder Bridges
• Soil Nail and Retaining Walls
• Bridge Foundation Construction
• Structural Steel Retrofit
• Source Inspection
• Bridge Demolition
• Caltrans and FHWA Coordination
UNICO and Dokken have delivered over 80 projects
together since UNICO’S inception. The firm’s
relevant Constructability Review experience includes:
• Sports Park Drive Pedestrian Overcrossing,
Woodland, CA
• Lime Creek Rd Bridge Replacement, Calaveras County
• Del Rio Trail, Sacramento, CA
• Kammerer Road Reconstruction, Elk Grove, CA
• 9362 Studio Court Remodel Ph 2 Tenant
Improvements & Police Department Campus
Improvements | Elk Grove, CA
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 16
Project Team Organization
Dokken has assembled a highly qualified team to
provide the needed services requested by the
City for the Pier Bridge Replacement Project.

Our Project Manager, Tim Osterkamp, PE, will be
supported by a staff that has worked together on
many similar projects. Tim has managed Dokken
services on many bridge projects throughout the
Southern California region such as East Garden
Grove-Wintersburg Channel Bridges and
Silverado Creek Bridge Replacement in Orange
County.

Tim has led the team completing the Type
Selection Report for the City’s Pier Bridge
Replacement project and will bring the same
level of responsiveness and quality into final
design of this project.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 17
Staffing Plan
The following table summarizes our key personnel’s availability for the duration of the contract in addition to their relevant project experience and areas of expertise. This table is followed by our approach to adequately staffing this project and resumes for our key personnel assigned to this contract.

NAME, PROJECT ROLE,

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE, AND COMPANY

AREAS OF EXPERTISE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

ANNUAL AVAILABILITY
2022-2023
Tim Osterkamp, PE
Project Manager
35 years of experience (10 w/ Dokken)
• Project Management & Subconsultant Management
• Cost Control & Schedule Management
• Agency & Stakeholder Coordination
• Complex Bridge Design
• Pier Bridge Replacement Type Selection Report | Santa Monica, CA | Project Manager • Pezzi Road HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | San Joaquin County | Project Manager • Silverado Canyon Road and Modjeska Canyon Road HBP Bridge Replacement Projects | Orange County | Project Manager • Camino Cielo Bridge Replacement and Ecosystem Rehabilitation at Matilija Dam | Ventura County | Project Manager 55%
John Klemunes, PE
Principal-in-Charge & Funding Assistance
32 years of experience (12 w/ Dokken)
• Grant Applications
• Agency & Stakeholder Coordination
• Contract Compliance
• QA/QC
• Pier Bridge Replacement Type Selection Report | Santa Monica, CA | Principal-in-Charge • 2016-2017 Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (28 Bridges) | Carlsbad, CA | Principal-in-Charge • Mast Park Improvements PA&ED and PS&E | Santee, CA | Principal-in-Charge • Superior Avenue Pedestrian Overcrossing and Parking Lot PS&E | Newport Beach, CA | Project Manager 35%
Rob Burns, PE, SE
Bridge Project Engineer
14 years of experience (13 w/ Dokken)
• Structures Design (Bridges and Retaining Walls)
• Project Management & Subconsultant Management
• Field Assessment of Existing Structural Conditions
• Seismic Analysis
• La Loma Road HBP Bridge Reconstruction PA&ED and PS&E | Pasadena, CA | Project Engineer • Carlsbad Boulevard Beach Access Repairs | Carlsbad, CA | Project Manager • Holly Street Bridge Seismic Retrofit PA&ED and PS&E | Pasadena, CA | Project Manager • Santa Fe Avenue HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | Stanislaus County | Bridge Project Engineer 50%
Marty Maechler, PE
Senior Bridge Design Engineer
38 years of experience (27 w/ Dokken)
• Structural Analysis & Design
• Caltrans Standards
• Foundation Design
• Project Delivery
• I-10/605 Interchange Design Build | Baldwin Park, CA | Structures Design Manager • SR-132 West Freeway-Expressway, Phase I PA&ED and PS&E | Modesto, CA | Structures Project Engineer • Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | Yuba City, CA | Senior Design Engineer • Green Tree Road Extension over BNSF PA&ED and PS&E | Victorville, CA | Lead Structures Design Engineer 50%
Fortunato Enriquez, PE
Senior Bridge Design Engineer
10 years of experience (All w/ Dokken)
• Field Assessment of Existing Structural Conditions
• Structural Analysis & Design
• Specifications
• Cost Estimating
• Pier Bridge Replacement Type Selection Report | Santa Monica, CA | Project Engineer • Silverado Canyon and Modjeska Canyon HBP Bridge Replacements PA&ED | Orange County | Project Engineer • 30 SB-1 Bridge Maintenance Projects | Orange County | Project Engineer • La Loma Road HBP Bridge Reconstruction PA&ED and PS&E | Pasadena, CA | Design Engineer 55%
Amir Momeni, PhD, PE, SE
Senior Bridge Design Engineer
10 years of experience (1 w/ Dokken)
• Transportation Structures Research & Analysis
• Bridge Design
• Timber Design
• Retaining Structures Design
• Vista Canyon Bridge over the Santa Clara River PS&E | Santa Clarita, CA | Senior Bridge Engineer • District 59 Caltrans On-Call Design Support Services | Northern California | Task Order Manager • Storm Damage Repair On-Call | Santa Cruz County | Lead Design Engineer • I-5 West End Viaduct, Caltrans District 3 On-Call Contract | Sacramento, CA | Assistant Project Manager 40%
Gabriela Morales, PE
Associate Bridge Design Engineer
6 years of experience (All w/ Dokken)
• Bridge Design
• Quantity Calculations
• Retaining Structures Design
• Caltrans Standards
• Pier Bridge Replacement Type Selection Report | Santa Monica, CA | Structures Design Engineer • SR-01 over Jack Peters Creek Bridge Widening TSR and PS&E | Mendocino County | Structures Design Engineer • Soda Springs Road HBP Bridge Replacement | Nevada County | Structures Design Engineer • Eastside at Olney Creek HBP Bridge Replacements | Redding, CA | Structures Design Engineer 65%
Eric Espinoza, PE
Roadway Project Engineer
10 years of experience (All w/ Dokken)
• Roadway Geometrics & Design
• Bridge Deck Drainage Design
• Utility Relocation Coordination & Design
• Project Management & Subconsultant Management
• Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | Yuba City, CA | Roadway PE & Utilities • SR-132 West Freeway-Expressway, Phase I PA&ED and PS&E | Modesto, CA | Design Engineer & Utility Engineer • 9 HBP Bridge Replacements PA&ED and PS&E | Nevada County | Roadway Design Engineer • Bear Valley Road over Mojave River HBP Bridge Widening | Apple Valley, CA | Roadway PE & Utility Coordination 50%
Matt Atkinson, PE, QSD/P
Senior Roadway Design Engineer
12 years of experience (9 w/ Dokken)
• Roadway Geometrics & Design
• Water Quality & Drainage Design
• Traffic Handing & Stage Construction
• Construction Support
• Pier Bridge Replacement Type Selection Report | Santa Monica, CA | Lead Roadway Engineer • Santa Fe Avenue HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | Stanislaus County | Roadway Project Engineer • Rock Springs Road over Mojave River HBP Bridge Replacement PS&E | San Bernardino County | Roadway Project Engineer • Bear Valley Rd. over Mojave River HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | Apple Valley, CA | Roadway Project Engineer 50%
Darwin Cruz, PE
Senior Roadway & Parking Lot Design Engineer
15 years of experience (All w/ Dokken)
• Roadway Geometrics & Design
• Parking Lot Design
• Utility Relocation Coordination & Design
• Traffic Handing & Stage Construction
• Preliminary Engineering for UC San Diego Gliderport Parking Lot Design | San Diego, CA | Project Engineer • Superior Avenue Pedestrian Overcrossing and Parking Lot PS&E | Newport Beach, CA | Senior Design Engineer • I-805/E. Palomar Street Transit Station, Park & Ride, and Direct Access Ramp | Chula Vista, CA | Project Engineer • Miramar Street & Athena Circle Improvements at UC San Diego | San Diego, CA | Project Engineer 55%
Amanda Konieczka, PE
Senior Roadway Design Engineer
11 years of experience (10 w/ Dokken)
• Roadway Geometrics & Design
• HBP Requirements
• Caltrans Coordination & Local Assistance Documents
• Cost Estimating
• Pier Bridge Replacement Type Selection Report | Santa Monica, CA | Utility/Roadway Engineer • SR-132 West Freeway-Expressway, Phase I PA&ED and PS&E | Modesto, CA | Project Engineer • 9 HBP Bridge Replacements PA&ED and PS&E | Nevada County | Roadway Project Engineer • Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | Yuba City, CA | Roadway & Drainage Engineer 60%
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 18

NAME, PROJECT ROLE,

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE, AND COMPANY

AREAS OF EXPERTISE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

ANNUAL AVAILABILITY
2022-2023
Richard Sanders, PE
Associate Roadway Design Engineer
8 years of experience (6 w/ Dokken)
• Roadway Geometrics & Design
• Cost Estimating
• Computer-aided Drafting & Design
• 3D Modeling
• Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | Yuba City, CA | Associate Engineer • SR-132 West Freeway-Expressway, Phase I PA&ED and PS&E | Modesto, CA | Associate Engineer • 9 HBP Bridge Replacements PA&ED and PS&E | Nevada County | Associate Design Engineer • Pezzi Road HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | San Joaquin County | Associate Design Engineer 65%
Tony Powers, PE
Senior ADA/Pedestrian/Bicycle Design Engineer
38 years of experience (13 w/ Dokken)
• ADA/Pedestrian/Bicycle-friendly Design
• ADA & Accessibility Compliance and Coordination
• Bridge Design
• Public & Community Outreach
• Ojai Valley Trail Bridge over San Antonio Creek PS&E | Ventura County | Project Manager • Safe Routes to Transit for Bicyclists Study for SACOG | Sacramento, CA | Senior Engineer • Bike Safety Improvement Recommendations, Folsom South Canal Bike Path | Rancho Cordova, CA | Senior Engineer • Del Rio Trail PA&ED and PS&E | Sacramento, CA | Senior Structures / Bikeway Engineer 45%
Rosa Griggs, PE
Lead Specifications Writer
20 years of experience (19 w/ Dokken)
• Specifications Writing
• QA/QC
• Complex Bridge Design
• HBP Requirements
• Pier Bridge Replacement Type Selection Report | Santa Monica, CA | QA/QC Manager • 9 HBP Bridge Replacements | Nevada County | Project Engineer & Specifications Writer • Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | Yuba City, CA | Specifications Writer • Rainbow Bridge HBP Rehabilitation PS&E | Folsom, CA | Specifications Writer 35%
Ashley Orsaba-Finders, PE, QSD/P
Drainage & Stormwater Design Lead
15 years of experience (5 w/ Dokken)
• Drainage Design
• Water Quality & BMPs
• MS4 Compliance
• Hydraulics & Hydrology
• Rock Springs Road over Mojave River HBP Bridge Replacement PS&E | San Bernardino County | Drainage Lead • Bear Valley Road over Mojave River HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | Apple Valley, CA | Drainage Lead • East Palm Canyon Drive Bridge Widening PA&ED and PS&E | Palm Springs, CA | Drainage Lead • Avenue 66 New Grade Separation over UPRR & SR-111 PA&ED and PS&E | Mecca, CA | Drainage Lead 50%
Jena Addenbrooke, PE
Utility Coordination & Design Lead
14 years of experience (All w/ Dokken)
• Utility Coordination & Design
• Utility Conflict Identification & Mapping
• FHWA Regulations & Requirements
• Roadway Design
• SR-11/Otay Mesa East Port of Entry, Phase I PS&E | San Diego, CA | Associate Engineer/Utility Coordinator • Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Dry Utilities Relocation | San Diego, CA | Associate Engineer/Utility Coordinator • I-805/E. Palomar Street Transit Station, Park & Ride, and Direct Access Ramp | Chula Vista, CA | Asst. Engineer/Utility Coord. • SR-76 Widening PS&E | Bonsall, CA | Assistant Engineer/Utility Coordinator 55%
Joe Ostdiek, PE, TE
Electrical/Lighting Design Lead, MEP & FP Oversight,
ADA/Pedestrian Bicycle Design
23 years of experience (20 w/ Dokken)
• Electrical Systems Analysis & Design
• Lighting Analysis and Design
• ADA & Accessibility Compliance and Coordination
• Utility Relocation Coordination & Design
• Project Management & Subconsultant Management
• Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | Yuba City, CA | Traffic Manager & Lighting Design • Golden Valley Road Bridge PSR & PS&E | Santa Clarita, CA | Signal & Lighting Design Engineer • McBean Parkway HBP Bridge Widening PS&E | Santa Clarita, CA | Signal & Lighting Design Engineer • Bear Valley Road Overhead at BNSF Railroad PA&ED and PS&E | Victorville, CA | Signal & Lighting Design Engineer • Green Tree Road Extension over BNSF PA&ED and PS&E | Victorville, CA | Signal & Lighting Design Engineer 45%
Amy Bakker
Environmental Lead
10 years of experience (7 w/ Dokken)
• Environmental Project & Subconsultant Management
• Agency Coordination
• Mitigation Planning & Implementation
• Environmental Documentation & Permitting
• Mojave Riverwalk Trail Environmental Permitting | Victorville, CA | Senior Environmental Planner • Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation PA&ED and PS&E | Palm Springs, CA | Environmental Planner & Lead Monitor • Temescal Canyon Road Realignment Environmental Clearance | Riverside County | Lead Environmental Planner • Avenue 66 New Grade Separation over UPRR & SR-111 PA&ED and PS&E | Mecca, CA | Environmental Planner 55%
Dave Clerici, PE
Constructability Review
49 years of experience (4 w/ Dokken)
• Constructability Review
• Construction Phasing
• Alternative Project Delivery
• QA/QC
• SR-132 West Freeway-Expressway, Phase I PA&ED and PS&E | Modesto, CA | Constructability Reviewer • I-10/605 Interchange Design Build | Baldwin Park, CA | Deputy Project Manager • Sexton Road HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | San Joaquin County | Constructability Reviewer • 9 HBP Bridge Replacements PA&ED and PS&E | Nevada County | Constructability Reviewer 25%
Lori Burne, PE, SE
Senior Structural Engineer
25 years of experience (15 w/ Burne Engineering)
• Structural Design, Rehabilitation, and Retrofit
• Construction of Buildings & Bridges
• Structural Analysis
• Structural Inspection
• Fixins Soul Food Restaurant – timber addition to masonry building for new restaurant | Sacramento, CA | Structural Engineer • Mackinaw Hotel – structural analysis, design, and details for new 4-story hotel | Placerville, CA | Structural Engineer • Taylor Lynn Apartments - structural analysis, design, and details for new 2-story, 22-unit apartment complex | Cloverdale, CA | Structural Engineer
25%
Molly Iley, PE
Principal/Senior Structural Engineer
24 years of experience (10 w/ Burne Engineering)
• Structural Design, Rehabilitation, and Retrofit
• Structural Analysis
• Caltrans Bridge Design Standards
• Constructability Review
• Smith River Bridge – Detour, PM 36, SR 101 PS&E | Del Norte County | Senior Bridge Engineer • Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Chanticleer Avenue Bike/Ped Overcrossing PS&E | Santa Cruz County | Independent Checker
• SR-01/Manchester Creek Pedestrian Bridge | Mendocino County | Senior Bridge Engineer 35%
Margaret Meadows
Public Outreach Lead
12 years of experience (3 w/ Arellano Associates)
• Public Outreach for Transportation Projects
• Community Relations
• Content Creation & Social Media Management
• Event Management
• Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Crenshaw/LAX Transit Project | Los Angeles, CA | Public Outreach Lead
• Metro, Purple Line Section 3 Project – Tunnels | Los Angeles, CA | Public Outreach Lead • Metro, Sepulveda Transit Corridor Feasibility Study | Los Angeles County | Public Outreach Lead 20%
Thomas Reese
Senior Public Outreach Project Coordinator
8 years of experience (4 w/ Arellano Associates)
• Strategic Communication & Message Development
• Project Organization
• Collateral Material Development
• Graphic Illustration Design
• Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Purple Line Extension Section 3 – Tunnels | Los Angeles, CA | Senior Project Coordinator
• SBCTA I-10 Corridor Express Lanes Design Build | San Bernardino, CA | Senior Project Coordinator • Caltrans I-10 Design Build Rehabilitation Project | Coachella Valley, CA | Senior Project Coordinator 35%
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 19

NAME, PROJECT ROLE,

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE, AND COMPANY

AREAS OF EXPERTISE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

ANNUAL AVAILABILITY
2022-2023
Jason Reynolds
Coastal Commission Permit Lead
29 years of experience (3 w/ Dudek)
• Coastal Commission Permit Requirements
• Coastal Development Permitting
• Environmental Clearance
• Environmental Impact Analysis
• Concrete Pier Replacement | Oceanside, CA | Environmental Contract Manager • Master Plan Update, San Mateo County Harbor District | San Mateo County | Environmental Contract Manager • Coastal Hazards Response Plan, San Simeon Community Services District | San Luis Obispo | Environmental Contract Manager • Dana Point Harbor Hotels Sea Level Rise Planning | Dana Point, CA | Environmental Contract Manager 35%
Eric Brown, PE, GE
Geotechnical Lead
29 years of experience (26 w/ EMI)
• Geotechnical Investigation, Design, and Analysis
• Foundation, Geotechnical Design & Materials Reports
• Caltrans Protocols for Encroachment Permits
• Constructability Review
• Pier Bridge Replacement Type Selection Report | Santa Monica, CA | Geotechnical Lead • California Incline Replacement | Santa Monica, CA | Senior Geotechnical Engineer • Sixth Street Viaduct Replacement | Los Angeles, CA | Senior Geotechnical Engineer • El Portal Pedestrian/Bicycle Underpass | Encinitas, CA | Geotechnical Project Manager 40%
Lisa Spivak, PLS
Survey Manager
34 years of experience (5 w/ Guida)
• Land Surveying
• Boundary Mapping
• Topographic Design Surveys
• LiDAR Surveys
• Pier Bridge Replacement Type Selection Report | Santa Monica, CA | Survey Manager • Camino Cielo Bridge Replacement, Phase 2 PS&E | Castro Valley, CA | Survey Manager • I-215/McCall Boulevard Interchange PA&ED and PS&E | Menifee, CA | Survey Manager • SR-47/Vincent Thomas Bridge & Front Street/Harbor Blvd Interchange Reconfiguration | Port of Los Angeles | Survey Manager 25%
Jessica Feldman
Senior Architectural Historian
26 years of experience (17 w/ ICF)
• Historic Preservation
• Architectural History
• Preservation Planning
• Historic Property Survey Reporting
• Pier Bridge Replacement Project | Santa Monica, CA | Architectural Historian/Subject Matter Expert • Mojave River Bridge Project | Barstow, CA | Architectural Historian/Subject Matter Expert • Mount Vernon Avenue Bridge Replacement Project | Architectural Historian • Historic Bridge Replacement & Rehabilitation Program – Caltrans District 7 | Los Angeles, CA | Architectural Historian 55%
Evan Mather, FASLA, PLA, SITES AP
Principal Landscape Architect
29 years of experience (19 w/ MIG)
• Landscape architecture design for parks,
streetscapes, schools, and housing
• Sustainable Landscape Architecture Design
• Burbank Water & Power EcoCampus | Burbank, CA | Principal Landscape Architect • Oxnard Campus Park | Oxnard, CA | Principal Landscape Architect • Willowbrook Streetscape and Bikeway Improvements | Los Angeles, CA | Principal Landscape Architect 10%
Aravind Batra, PE, LC, LEED AP BD+C
Senior Electrical Engineer
30 years of experience (27 w/ P2S)
• Electrical design for renovation & new buildings
• Electrical design for transportation projects
• Independent & peer review of electrical plans
• UC San Diego Gilman Bridge Electrical Design | La Jolla, CA | Senior Electrical Engineer • Mt San Antonio College Bookstore and Pedestrian Bridge Electrical Design | Walnut, CA | Senior Electrical Engineer • Cier of Hermosa Beach Pier Plaza Lighting Design | Hermosa Beach, CA | Senior Electrical Engineer 35%
Rolando Domingo, PE, CPD, LEED AP
Senior Plumbing Engineer
29 years of experience (18 w/ P2S)
• Design, specifications, and construction support for
plumbing & fire protection systems
• MEP&FP design coordination w/ client & project team
• Van Nuys Administration Center Upgrades | Van Nuys, CA | Senior Plumbing Engineer • Long Beach Arena Water Calculation | Long Beach, CA | Senior Plumbing Engineer • Metropolitan Water District Maintenance Building Design & Construction Support | La Verne, CA | Senior Plumbing Engineer 40%
Andrew Fiscus, PE
Constructability Review
15 years of experience (1 w/ UNICO)
• Construction of transportation structures
• Constructability review of new, temporary, and
rehabilitated structures
• SR-11/Siempre Viva Road Overcrossing, Caltrans District 11 | San Diego, CA | Falsework Design Engineer • SR-905-Otay Mesa Port of Entry, Caltrans District 11 | San Diego, Ca | Falsework Design Engineer • Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project | San Deigo, CA | Falsework Design Engineer 35%
Staffing Approach
Dokken currently has over 135 employees of which we have assigned 31 to this contract. Considering availability, this equates to approximately 30,000 available Dokken FTE hours assigned to the City. In addition, we have 11 specialty subconsultants on the team adding 33+ professionals available to this project. As demonstrated by our past performance with public agency projects, Dokken has the depth of staff to meet the City’s desired schedule and available budget. We have reviewed our current and anticipated workload for our proposed staff and attest they are available through the duration of this contract.

A summary of our staffing plan, including our subconsultants, is as follows:
• Our Project Manager, Tim Osterkamp, PE, and his assigned Project Engineers will be the focal point of contact for Team communications. They will work directly with Tim to coordinate tasks and product development between City staff and the Dokken Team.
• Project meetings, videoconferencing, conference calls, e-mails, and other communication methods will be used to ensure everyone is on the same page. • Tim will ensure communication between all team members is timely and responsive. The assigned key personnel will ensure information is accurate and the City is kept appraised of the project’s progress. • Tim will ensure that project leads and subconsultants are aware of the project’s scope, budget, and schedule prior to beginning each task. • Task-level budgets and durations will be assigned to staff at the beginning of the project assignment. Progress will be monitored by the Project Engineers and verified by Tim. • Fundamental tasks will be assigned to Associate and Assistant Engineers for completion. Experienced Associate / Senior Engineers will provide oversight during task completion and review / approve the product developed.

By accurately understanding this project’s needs and constraints, our hand-picked team will provide the necessary services to develop a feasible and cost-effective design to meet this project’s purpose and need. When the need arises, Dokken’s goal is to turn potentially challenging project constraints into major project successes.

PROJECT MANAGER
Education
1988, MS Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis 1985, BS Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis Licenses/Certifications
1990, California Professional Civil Engineer, #C46783
Experience
35 years (10 w/ Dokken)
Mr. Timothy (Tim) Osterkamp has
35 years of experience in the
preparation of bridge plans,
specifications, and estimates for
transportation design projects. Tim has
served as a Project Manager, Project
Engineer, Senior Designer, Independent Design Checker,
and Specifications Writer, and Cost Estimator on many
successful structural projects.

As Project Manager, Tim will ensure sufficient resources are available to the team to complete all assigned tasks on schedule, within budget, and to City satisfaction. He will be available to meet with and present to City
leadership/stakeholders, assist with funding and obtain project approvals.

Pezzi Rd. Bridge Replacement | San Joaquin County
Project Manager | This $1.8M HBP project will replace
the Pezzi Road Bridge over the Calaveras River in San
Joaquin County. The bridge was constructed in 1926 and
consists of two 9-foot-wide lanes and a clear width of 18 feet. The channel is situated in a wide floodplain with heavily vegetated slopes and a channel bed comprised of silt. The County’s preferred bridge type is an 80-foot-long, two-span, cast-in-place reinforced concrete slab bridge on a new alignment east of the existing bridge. Tim is
responsible for overseeing a multidisciplinary team for preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, final design, and PS&E, as well as utility coordination, public outreach and construction support.

Fifth Street Bridge Replacement over Feather River |
Yuba City & Marysville
Project Engineer | This HBP project improved the
functionally obsolete bridge conditions and traffic
operations of Fifth Street by constructing a new four-lane bridge and reconstructing both approaches. Because the
bridge connects two cities in two separate counties over a large waterway, multi-agency coordination (including
Caltrans, the Central Valley Flood Protection Board, and the Army Corps of Engineers), was a key factor in keeping the project on schedule. Tim was responsible for the
design of the 1868’ long Feather River box-girder bridge and 2nd Street precast concrete wide flange girder bridge.

Silverado Canyon Bridge and Modjeska Canyon
Bridges | Orange County
Project Manager | These HBP projects will replace the
Silverado Bridge and rehabilitate the Modjeska bridge in Orange County. The projects include, stage construction traffic handling, utility coordination, hydraulic analysis, public outreach, NEPA/CEQA documentation, regulatory
permitting, and preparation of construction documents,
as well as bridge and road approach design. The
environmental process is nearing completion, and Type
Selection Reports have been prepared and submitted to
Caltrans with the Type Selection meeting scheduled in
September 2022.

Storm Damage On-Call Engineering Support |
Santa Cruz County
Project Manager | As part of an on-call services
agreement, 26 storm damage sites are being repaired on
various mountain roads. Repair types include tie-back
soldier pile, soil nail, reinforced earth, and rock walls.

Construction is complete at 15 sites with the remaining sites to be completed within a year. Services include site inspection, surveying, geotechnical, PS&E, environmental clearance, right of way engineering, and utility
coordination. Critical issues include coordination to
advance all sites simultaneously and traffic handling
during construction. Project funding includes FEMA and
FHWA. Tim is responsible for client coordination, site
inspections, design oversight, and project delivery.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Mike McGowan Bridge over Barge Canal Env Doc &
PS&E (8-span, CIP post-tensioned concrete slab bridge)
| West Sacramento, CA
• Sharon Avenue Bridge Replacement over ACID
Irrigation Canal Env Doc and PS&E (single span CIP
post-tensioned concrete slab bridge with complex
temporary detour) | Redding, CA
• SB-1 Bridge Maintenance Projects (engineering and
construction support services for over 30 bridge
maintenance projects) | Orange County, CA
• Bear Valley Road Overhead at BNSF Railroad PA&ED
and PS&E (3 span precast concrete voided slab bridge
widening and rehabilitation) | Victorville, CA
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 21
John Klemunes, PE

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE &

FUNDING ASSISTANCE
Education
1995, MS Civil Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park 1990, BS Civil Engineering, Pennsylvania State University Licenses/Certifications
2000, California Professional Civil Engineer, #C60728
Envision Sustainability Professional (ENV SP) Certification #29561 Experience
32 years (12 w/ Dokken)
Mr. John Klemunes is the President of
Dokken and brings over 32 years of
experience on transportation projects
serving as a Project Manager, Principalin-Charge, or QA/QC Engineer. His work experience includes a wide variety of bridge,
highway and roadway projects in all project development phases, from planning to final design.

John is a skilled leader of multidisciplinary teams. He also has extensive Caltrans project experience and a proven
track record in delivering projects for local agencies that involve Caltrans oversight. He fully understands the
Caltrans process and coordinates with each Functional
Unit to receive timely buy-in to ensure the project
remains on schedule.

John’s past experience includes working for FHWA for
more than ten years, where he was responsible for the
review and approval of modified access reports,
environmental documents and project approvals. This
tenure has given him a big picture understanding of the FHWA processes and procedures the local agency
projects must adhere to. He has continued his
relationships with California Division Office staff of FHWA and understands the restructuring and organizational
enhancements within that office.

Prospect Avenue Corridor Enhancement | Santee, CA
Principal-in-Charge | Dokken provided preliminary
engineering and completed the PS&E package for this
$23 million corridor enhancement road widening. The
project relied heavily on right-of-way coordination with property owners, utility companies and the County of San Diego to meet deadlines and secure project funding. A
significant component of the project was the Rule 20B
undergrounding of overhead utilities throughout the
corridor. Dokken also provided construction support for this project which was opened to traffic in 2016. As
Principal-in-Charge, John provided high-level project
oversight and ensured resources were made available to
the project manager to deliver the project on time.

Paseo Santa Fe Streetscape Improvements Phase II
and III | Vista, CA
Project Manager | John was responsible for the PS&E
project design improvements including roundabouts,
utility undergrounding, enhanced landscaping and
hardscaping, pedestrian oriented streetscape furnishings, and water quality design features that qualify this
roadway as a Green Street.

Superior Avenue Overcrossing and Parking Lot |
Newport Beach, CA
Project Manager | Project involved preparation of the
PS&E for a new pedestrian and bicycle bridge and a
parking lot. The parking lot improvements added parking capacity for the adjacent Sunset Ridge Park and
beachgoers. The pedestrian bridge crosses Superior
Avenue providing safe, direct access to the park. In
addition, the project included retaining walls, landscaping, and drainage improvements for stormwater collection
and water quality treatment.

Plaza Boulevard Widening | National City, CA
Principal-in-Charge | John provided project oversight for preparation of the PS&E plans for the $8M widening of

1.1 miles of Plaza Boulevard from a 4 Lane to a 6 Lane
roadway. The project is located in a completely urbanized corridor and includes right of way acquisition, Caltrans coordination, tieback retaining walls, improved drainage facilities, utility coordination and undergrounding, ADA compliance, and matching existing improvements.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• 2016-2017 Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program
(28 bridges) | Carlsbad, CA | Principal-in-Charge
• Miramar Street & Athena Circle Improvements and
Utility Upgrades | San Diego, CA | Principal-in-Charge
• Coastal Rail Trail and Bridge Across Loma Alta Creek
PS&E | Oceanside, CA | Principal-in-Charge
• East Palomar Street Transit Station, Park & Ride and
DAR at I-805 | Chula Vista, CA | Principal-in-Charge
• Mast Park Improvements PA&ED and PS&E |
Santee, CA | Principal-in-Charge
• Via De Cristina Park PS&E | Santee, CA |
Principal-in-Charge
• Three Bridges Improvements PA&ED and PS&E |
Larkspur, CA | Project Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 22
Rob Burns, PE, SE

BRIDGE PROJECT ENGINEER
Education
2016, MBA, California State University, Sacramento
2011, MS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Sacramento
2008, BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Sacramento
Licenses/Certifications
2015, California Structural Engineer, # S6289
2012, California Civil Engineer, #C79091
Experience
14 years (13 w/ Dokken)
Mr. Robert (Rob) Burns is a California
registered structural and civil engineer
with over 14 years of experience in the
design of bridges and other
transportation structures. Rob
specializes in the preparation of PS&E for
bridge, roadway, pedestrian facilities, and trail projects.

He provides advanced planning studies and field
assessments of existing bridges, structural and seismic analysis, and construction support. His knowledge and
experience ranges from the funding/application phase to final design to RFA submittals and project construction.

SR-99 Chico Corridor Bikeway Facility, Ph 5| Chico, CA
Project Manager | The SR-99 Bikeway is a regional facility that mostly parallels the SR-99 corridor from the southern City limits to the northern City limits and is slightly greater than seven miles in length. Phase 5 will close the gap
between the Class I facility constructed in Phase 1 and connect to the new Class I facility to be constructed in Phase 4. The project is on schedule and on budget.

Fifth Street HBP Bridge Replacement over Feather
River | Yuba City & Marysville
Design Engineer | This project included the construction of a new four-lane bridge over the Feather River, a new four-lane bridge over 2nd Street, expansion of Fifth Street to four lanes, and improvements to the Fifth Street and J Street Intersection in Marysville, including a new
eastbound dedicated right turn lane. Rob was responsible for the advance planning studies for the structures,
evaluation of the existing structures, and design check for the 2nd Street overcrossing.

La Loma Road HBP Bridge Reconstruction |
Pasadena, CA
Project Engineer| This project retrofitted the historic reinforced concrete spandrel arch bridge with high
seismicity due to a fault under the bridge. Rob developed a procedure using non-linear modeling techniques to identify a feasible retrofit strategy while preserving the historic architecture of the arches and spandrels and maintaining structural integrity. This HBP project was eligible for the Historic Register and involved significant public outreach with community advocacy groups. Rob was responsible for obtaining approval from the City, the Historic Design
Advisory Group, and Caltrans Local Assistance.

Santa Fe Avenue HBP Bridge Replacement |
Stanislaus County
Project Engineer | Rob was responsible for developing
an Alternative Study Report to justify the replacement of the Santa Fe Avenue Bridge over the Tuolumne River. In
addition to providing the structural calculations to show that a retrofit is required, Rob performed a life-cycle cost analysis that was used to provide the financial
justification for a full replacement. Rob led the bridge design team and delivered the full PS&E package and
submitted the construction RFA to Caltrans.

Yucca Loma Road/Yates Road Widening & Green Tree
Boulevard Extension | San Bernardino County
Structures Design Engineer | This project widened
Yucca Loma Road from two to four lanes, widened Yates
Road from two to four lanes, and will extend Green Tree Boulevard with four thru-lanes, all with the addition of a curb, gutter, sidewalks and paved multi-use trails and the modification of two existing traffic signals. The project included a large river crossing bridge and nearly one mile of soundwalls. Rob provided the structural design and
construction specifications for the masonry block and
transparent panel sound walls.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Carlsbad Boulevard Beach Access Repairs |
Carlsbad, CA | Project Manager
• Ojai Valley Trail Bridge over San Antonio Creek
PS&E | Ventura County | Project Manager
• 5 HBP Bridge Replacements Design Build |
Trinity County | Project Manager
• I-805/Palomar Direct Access Ramp PS&E |
Chula Vista, CA | Structures Project Engineer
• Johnny Cash Pedestrian Overcrossing & MSE Wall
PS&E | Folsom, CA | Project Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 23
Marty Maechler, PE

SENIOR BRIDGE DESIGN ENGINEER
Education
1983, BS Civil Engineering, University of the Pacific
Licenses/Certifications
1987, California Civil Engineer, # C42513
Experience
38 years (27 w/ Dokken)
Mr. Martin (Marty) Maechler has over
38 years of experience in the bridge
engineering field. His experience
includes the preparation of planning
studies, structural designs on new
bridges, light rail aerial structures,
rehabilitation and replacement projects, emergency
repairs, and seismic retrofit projects. He also provides construction support and reviews shop drawings to verify conformity to contract plans and specifications.

Marty has served as Project Engineer, Senior Bridge
Designer, Independent Design Checker or Specifications
Writer on numerous structural projects covering more
than 160 individual bridge structures and is very familiar with Caltrans' standards and current design and detail
practices.

Fifth Street HBP Bridge Replacement over Feather
River | Yuba City, CA
Senior Engineer | Marty was responsible for
independent design check of a bridge replacement over
the Feather River. The structure is a 10-span, 1,868-footlong, 76.5-foot-wide, prestressed concrete box girder bridge founded on large diameter concrete piles. The
HBP funded project replaces the existing 2-lane bridge
with a 4-lane bridge. Design features include aesthetic columns, overhangs and barrier, pedestrian overlooks,
seismic induced soil liquefaction, and regulatory
constraints for work in the river and work on the levees.

Yucca Loma Road Bridge over Mojave River |
San Bernardino County
Senior Engineer | Marty was responsible for
independent design check of a new bridge crossing of the Mojave River. The structure is a 13-span, 1,606-foot-long, 99-foot-wide, prestressed concrete box girder bridge
founded on large diameter concrete piles. Also
developed technical special provisions and provided
construction support for structure construction.

SR-108 / North County Corridor | Stanislaus County
Project Engineer | This project constructs a new 20-mile state route consisting of a 4-6 lane freeway / expressway between SR 219/108 and SR 120. Marty provided the
design for two of the project bridges that carry the new road over the concrete lined Modesto Irrigation District (MID) Main Canal. Marty and the engineering team
provided solutions to utility conflicts by the excellent, established working relationship with the area’s utility representatives.

Caltrans District 59 Structures On-Call (59A1069) |
Northern California
Task Order Manager & Bridge Design Lead | As part of
this on-call contract for Caltrans, Marty provided:

Design check for Panther Creek Bridge, a complex,
custom designed unbraced steel tied arch bridge on SR
101 in Del Norte County. Marty’s work included check of the precast and cast in place concrete elements as well as the steel hangers. Elements included precast and posttensioned tie beam, precast end knuckles, precast end beam and floor beam, and cast in place deck. The
CSiBridge program was utilized to analyze the structural stresses and displacement at each stage of construction and for seismic analysis of the completed structure. A 3D CADD model was developed to identify conflicts within
the heavily reinforced knuckle that included posttensioned tendons. prestress anchorages, anchor bolts, structural steel pins and tie-rods that enter the knuckle from four sides.

Santa Clara River Bridge | Santa Clarita, CA
Senior Engineer | Marty provided the independent
structure design check, prepared specifications and
provided construction support for a new six-span 840'
long by 76' wide bridge spanning the South Fork of the
Santa Clara River, SR-126 and the Los Angeles area
Metrolink railroad in the City of Santa Clarita. The design consisted of a prestressed concrete box girder
superstructure supported by three column bents on
driven pile foundations. Special provisions were
developed to minimize construction impacts within the
river channel.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Rock Springs Road over the Mojave River HBP Bridge
Replacement PA&ED and PS&E | San Bernardino
County | Senior Bridge Engineer
• Bob Jones Bikeway PS&E | San Luis Obispo, CA |
Senior Bridge Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 24
Fortunato Enriquez, PE

SENIOR BRIDGE DESIGN ENGINEER
Education
2012, MS Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis 2011, BS Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico Licenses/Certifications
2015, California Civil Engineer, # C84849
Experience
10 years (All w/ Dokken)
Mr. Fortunato Enriquez is a California
registered Professional Engineer with
10 years of bridge design and HBP
experience. Fortunato specializes in
the preparation of plans, specifications,
and estimates (PS&Es) for bridge projects
for local agencies throughout California. Fortunato
routinely conducts independent reviews for local agencies and developers. He is well versed in standard Caltrans
and AASHTO Bridge Design Details and Specifications and is able to thoroughly vet PS&E packages for
constructability and code compliance.

Silverado Canyon HBP Bridge Replacement |
Silverado, CA
Project Engineer | Dokken is providing engineering and
construction support services for this project which
replaces a 64’ long steel through girder bridge. Fortunato is responsible for the structure design, specifications, and overseeing the estimate.

SB-1 Bridge Maintenance Projects | Orange County
Project Engineer | Dokken is providing engineering and
construction support services for over 25 bridge
maintenance projects throughout Orange County. The
projects range from repairing wingwalls and treating
bridge decks to fire damage repair and patching spalls. The projects are funded through SB-1. Fortunato performed
site visits, developed the project PS&E during the design phase and provided construction support responding to
RFI’s and submittal reviews during construction.

Fifth Street HBP Bridge Replacement over Feather
River | Yuba City, CA
Structures Design Engineer | This project will replace
the 5th Street Bridge over the Feather River and improve approach roadways to the bridge. The 5th Street Bridge is a major arterial connector between the City of Yuba City and the City of Marysville. The project will include the construction of a new four-lane bridge over the Feather River, a new four-lane bridge over 2nd Street, expansion of 5th Street to four lanes, and improvements to the 5th Street and J Street Intersection in Marysville, including a new eastbound dedicated right turn lane. Fortunato
designed the retaining walls on Fifth Street and provided construction support responding to RFIs during the
construction phase of the project.

Redwood Road HBP Bridge Replacement |
Santa Cruz County
Independent Checker | Located on a very narrow singlelane road with very steep terrain in the Santa Cruz mountains with no alternative access, the replacement
structure included a 34’ slab bridge and 60’ side hill
viaduct to avoid construction in the creek. Traffic handling to maintain access at all times necessitated the
construction of a 112’ long soldier pile wall. Community outreach to provide the isolated residents updates and
input and coordination with emergency response
agencies was performed. Fortunato was responsible for
the project plans, specifications, and engineers estimate.

SR-132 West Freeway/Expressway Phase 1| Modesto, CA
Structures Design Engineer | This project constructed
3 miles of new freeway and a new freeway-to-freeway
interchange with SR-99. The project included
maintenance of traffic on SR-99, 4 bridges, 2 massive MSE walls, and CRCP and JPCP pavements for the mainline of
the new freeway and HMA for the local roadways. The
design also included pump stations, stormwater
treatment, heavy ITS componentry, depressed roadway
sections, reconstruction of existing non-standard on- and off-ramps, and utility coordination. Fortunato was
responsible for design of the SR-99/ SR-132 grade
separation, a sound wall, and 3 retaining walls. Fortunato was also responsible for the independent check of
Emerald Road overcrossing. The ribbon cutting for this
critical project was held September 2022.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Parkshore Drive Bridge Emergency Repairs |
Folsom, CA | Bridge Design Engineer
• Kings Creek Bridge Emergency Repairs |
Plumas County | Bridge Design Engineer
• Greenhorn Bridge Emergency Repairs |
Plumas County | Bridge Design Engineer
• Indian Canyon Road Widening and Bridge
Replacement at UPRR | Palm Springs, CA |
Bridge Design Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 25
Amir Momeni, PhD, PE, SE

SENIOR BRIDGE DESIGN ENGINEER
Education
2016, PhD Civil Engineering, Kansas State University
2013, MS Civil Engineering, Kansas State University
2010, BS, Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Licenses/Certifications
2021, CA Professional Structural Engineer, #S7008
2019, CA Professional Civil Engineer, #C91214
2017, FHWA-NHI-130055 Safety Inspection of In-Service Bridges Experience
10 years (1 w/ Dokken)
Mr. Amir Momeni is a licensed
structural engineer with 10 years of
experience in transportation
structures research, bridge design and
project management. He has extensive
knowledge from working on projects from
the pursuit phase to completion. Amir is experienced with infrastructure related projects including bridges, viaducts and earth retaining structures, Amir has performed and
managed structure tasks in PS&E, Design-Build and APS
projects.

I-5 West End Viaduct, Caltrans District 3 On-Call
Contract | Sacramento, CA
Assistant Project Manager | The purpose of the project
is to strengthen the steel girder spans of the I-5 West End Viaduct to meet a full load rating capacity, so that future permit vehicles may utilize this bridge on I-5. In addition, the bridge will be seismically retrofitted for no-collapse condition. This project requires significant coordination among the various disciplines as impact of construction to the environment and I-5 closures needs to be
determined. As Assistant Project Manager, Amir has been involved in all aspects of day-to-day project management including creating fee estimates using Caltrans Work
Breakdown Structure (WBS), monitoring budget and
reviewing invoices, coordination with client and
subconsultants, developing communication plan,
preparing monthly progress reports, tracking submittals, and reviewing risk management plans (RMP). Additionally, Amir developed Life Cycle Cost Analysis for three
proposed alternatives as well as structure cost estimates for all three alternatives.

District 59 Caltrans On-Call Design Support Services |
Northern California
Task Order Manager | As part of on-call design support
services to District 59, Amir led a PS&E emergency
project, design of 2700 feet soldier pile anchor wall in Sonoma County, which required extensive coordination
with geotechnical engineers and district roadway
engineers due to variation in soil type along the wall and multiple drainage systems crossing the wall. Through
close communication with the District, Amir was able to successfully move the design of this major retaining wall structure to completion under tight deadlines.

Storm Damage Repair On-Call | Santa Cruz County
Lead Design Engineer | Amir oversaw the design and
independent check of retaining walls at 12 different sites.

The design services include soil nail walls, soldier pile walls, gabion basket and tie-back wall systems. This work was an emergency project and Amir was able to
successfully coordinate with the County and deliver the PS&E project plans under tight deadlines.

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority US 101
Delacruz Boulevard Intersection | San Jose, CA
Project Engineer | Amir was responsible for the design
of two Pedestrian Undercrossings (PUC) and
superstructure of a 4-span precast prestressed concrete girder overcrossing (OC) as part of this project. One
challenge in design of the overcrossing superstructure
was to keep the structural depth below a certain limit due to the vicinity to San Jose Airport and per the request of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Amir was
responsible for construction support and responding to
RFIs.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Vista Canyon Bridge over the Santa Clara River PS&E
| Santa Clarita, CA | Senior Bridge Engineer
• US-50 Multimodal Improvement and Rehabilitation
Design/Build Project | Sacramento, CA | Structures
Design Lead
• Crabtree Road Bridge Replacement | Stanislaus
County | Senior Bridge Engineer
• I-5 Richards Blvd Interchange Improvements,
Sacramento, CA | Senior Bridge Engineer
• Iron Horse Trail Retaining Wall | Dublin, CA | Senior Bridge Engineer
• BART New Traction Power Facilities West Bay Core
Capacity | Bay Area | Senior Bridge Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 26
Gabriela Morales, PE

ASSOCIATE BRIDGE DESIGN ENGINEER
Education
2021, MS Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis 2017, BS, Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego
Licenses/Certifications
2022, CA Professional Civil Engineer, #C93473
Experience
6 years (All w/ Dokken)
Ms. Gabriela Morales is a California
registered Engineer with 6 years of
experience in designing and analyzing
bridges and other transportationrelated structures. She serves as an associate engineer for Dokken’s bridge and
structure design team. She has designed structures
ranging from multi-span precast and cast in place
bridges, to multi-level anchored soldier pile walls.

Soda Springs Road HBP Bridge Replacement |
Nevada County
Structures Design Engineer | This project replaced the
existing bridge with a single-span, 44-foot-long and 39- foot 8-inch wide, cast-in-place/post-tensioned slab bridge.

Gabriela designed the bridge for the 50-year and 100-year flood events, including the flow from the potential
removal of a dam upstream from the bridge location. The bridge was designed for freeze/thaw due to the bridge
elevation.

SR-01 over Jack Peters Creek Bridge Widening |
Mendocino County
Structures Design Engineer | This project is part of
Dokken’s structures on-call contract in Caltrans District 1.

The proposed bridge will widen the existing three-span
223-foot-long continuous bridge over Jack Peters Creek.

The bridge will feature two 12-foot lanes and a 6-foot
separated pedestrian walkway. Gabriela successfully
wrote the project’s Type Selection Report. The report was approved by Caltrans and Gabriela complted the design
phase of the project. The project is schedule to go to bid in 2023.

Eastside at Olney Creek HBP Bridge Replacement |
Redding, CA
Structures Design Engineer | This project replaced the
existing bridge with a three-span, 86-foot-long and 52-foot wide, cast-in-place/post-tensioned slab bridge. Gabriela was responsible for the design calculations and
development of the plans and cost estimate of this project.

SR-132 West Freeway/Expressway, Ph 1 | Modesto, CA
Structures Design Engineer | This project will construct 3 miles of new freeway and a new freeway to freeway
interchange with SR-99. The project included maintenance of traffic on SR-99, 4 bridges, 2 massive MSE walls, and CRCP and JPCP pavements for the mainline of the new
freeway and HMA for the local roadways. The design also included pump stations, stormwater treatment, heavy ITS componentry, depressed roadway sections, reconstruction of existing non-standard on- and off-ramps, and utility coordination. Gabriela was responsible for the structure design calculations of two cast-in-place post-tensioned box girder bridges on the project.

Santa Monica Pier Bridge Replacement Type Selection
Report | Santa Monica, CA
Assistant Design Engineer | This project aims to obtain Caltrans approval on the Bridge Type Selection Report in order obtain Caltrans NEPA approval and allow the City to adopt the final Environmental Impact Report. Gabriela
was responsible for all preliminary bridge layout and
design and assisted in writing the report. The Bridge Type Selection Meeting with Caltrans took place in September, 2022 and final Caltrans approval is forthcoming.

Capital Southeast Connector: White Rock Road |
El Dorado & Sacramento Counties, CA
Assistant Design Engineer | This project is a gap closure from the completed Sacramento County improvements
on White Rock Road to the White Rock Road
improvements in El Dorado County near Latrobe Road.

Gabriela was responsible for the design of two 3-span RC slab bridges, layout and design of two headwalls for
large-diameter pipe culverts, and the design of two outfall structures. Gabriela is currently responsible for ongoing construction support, including RFI responses and
submittal reviews.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Bear Valley Road over Mojave River HBP Bridge
Widening PA&ED and PS&E | Apple Valley, CA |
Structures Design Engineer
• Sexton Road HBP Bridge Replacement PS&E |
San Joaquin County | Structures Design Engineer
• Sharon Avenue HBP Bridge Replacement |
Redding, CA | Structures Design Engineer
• Retaining Walls Storm Damage Repair On-Call |
El Dorado County | Structures Design Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 27
Eric Espinoza, PE

ROADWAY PROJECT ENGINEER
Education
2012, BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico Licenses/Certifications
2016, CA Professional Civil Engineer, #C85232
Experience
10 years (All w/ Dokken)
Mr. Eric Espinoza is a Project Engineer
with 10 years of experience in civil,
roadway, and trail design as well as
construction inspection and support
for federally funded transportation
projects. Eric retains extensive knowledge
of the Utility Certification process which includes
preparation of documents in accordance with Caltrans’
Right of Way Manual and the LAPM.

Eric is skilled at performing geometric design for
roadways and bridges. Eric’s other specialties include the preparation of contract documents (PS&E), completing
local assistance documentation, assisting in the
environmental process, and assisting in right of way and utility certifications. He leads quality assurance for utility relocations; planning and overseeing the implementation of traffic staging; being an effective liaison between the contractor and Resident Engineer; and managing public
outreach and resident communication.

Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge
Replacement | Yuba City, CA
Project Engineer & Utility Engineer | This project
replaced the functionally obsolete bridge conditions and improved traffic operations of Fifth Street by constructing a new four lane bridge and reconstructing both
approaches, including new on-ramps. Eric provided
direction and support during construction and ensured
utility relocations were completed appropriately. Eric also designed a new interconnection water pipeline through
the new bridge, as well as facilitated the design of
conduits in the bridge for communication lines and
prepared the staging and traffic handling plans for the project. Eric was also responsible for the design of a 200+ stall parking lot. Construction was completed July 2020.

Marsh St. Bridge Replacement | San Luis Obispo, CA
Project Engineer & Utility Coordinator | This project
replaced the existing Marsh Street Bridge structure over San Luis Obispo Creek with a single-span post-tensioned slab bridge. Eric was responsible for the design and
preparation of the PS&E package including utility
coordination with Southern California Gas, AT&T, City Public Works, PG&E, and the staging and traffic handling plans.

Project was completed in December 2020.

Bear Valley Road Bridge over the Mojave River |
Apple Valley, CA
Roadway Project Engineer & Utility Coordination |
This project involves widening the existing 6-lane Bear Valley Road bridge that crosses the Mojave River. Eric is responsible for the roadway design, utility coordination, preparing stage construction, and coordinating with
subconsultants (geotechnical, survey, and potholing). He is also coordinating with Southern California Edison (SCE) for the relocation of 115 KV power lines and
communication lines.

SR-18/Apple Valley Road Intersection Improvements |
Apple Valley, CA
Project Engineer | The final design: reduced excessive
vehicle delays and improved traffic operations; removed the existing off-set between the north and south
approaches to reduce potential conflicts; and improved
the vertical profile through the intersection to improve rideability. Eric was responsible for ensuring Caltrans’ design standards were met and identifying the need,
documenting, and receiving approval of Design Standard
Decision Documents as necessary.

SR-132 West Freeway/Expressway Ph 1 | Modesto, CA
Senior Design Engineer & Utility Engineer | This project is necessary to improve regional and interregional
circulation, relieve traffic congestion along SR-132 and improve operations on one of the most important eastwest routes in the Central Valley. This $92M project will construct a two-lane expressway to reroute SR-132 away
from downtown. Eric led utilities design and coordination.

In addition, he is responsible for waterline and irrigation designs as well as relocation of high-voltage power lines.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Auburn Boulevard Complete Streets Revitalization
Phase 2 | Placer County | Utilities Engineer
• Westwood Neighborhoods Street Improvements
Preliminary Engineering and PS&E | Napa, CA |
Project Manager
• Bob Jones Bikeway PS&E | San Luis Obispo, CA |
Design Engineer
• Amador City Bridge Replacement PS&E | Amador
City, CA | Project Engineer and Construction Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 28
Matt Atkinson, PE, PMP, QSD/P

SENIOR ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
Education
2010, BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Sacramento
Licenses/Certifications
2013, CA Professional Civil Engineer, # C82099
2020, Project Management Professional, #2774911
2021, CA QSD/QSP #27777
Experience
12 years (9 w/ Dokken)
Mr. Matthew (Matt) Atkinson has
over 12 years of experience in
planning, design, and delivery of
transportation projects, including
major corridors, roads, bridges,
pedestrians, transit, interchanges, and
freeway projects. His experience includes the
preparation of Feasibility Studies, Project Reports,
Schematics, Environmental Document coordination, PS&E
bid documents, and construction support. In addition to working for Dokken he gained public experience serving
as a Project Manager for the Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) at the Dallas District
Headquarters in the Advance Project Development,
where he managed large corridor projects through the
PA&ED phase. Matt is familiar with both FHWA and
Caltrans operations and procedures.

Rock Springs Road over Mojave River HBP Bridge
Replacement | San Bernardino County
Project Engineer │ This project replaces the existing low water crossing with a 2-lane bridge to provide year-round access, improve safety and operations in the City of
Hesperia/San Bernardino County. Matt was responsible
for PS&E, as well as the revision of HBP application,
preparation of roadway design geometrics, construction
staging, and utility coordination.

Bear Valley Road over Mojave River HBP Bridge
Rehabilitation & Widening | Apple Valley, CA
Project Engineer │ This project rehabilitated and
widened the existing Mojave River Bridge at Bear Valley Road through the Federal HBP, including wider lanes,
shoulders, and sidewalks. Matt was responsible for the
preliminary engineering, utility coordination, HBP
application and PS&E preparation.

Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation | Palm Springs, CA
Project Engineer │ This project rehabilitated and
widened Bogert Trail Bridge over the Palm Canyon Wash,
to provide full standard traffic lanes and shoulders to match the existing roadway width to the east and west of the bridge. Matt was responsible for roadway geometrics, construction staging and traffic control, utility
coordination, and preparation of PS&E.

Elk Creek Bridge Replacement (Caltrans D1 OnCall/Task Order #16) | Mendocino County Project Engineer | This project provides planning and
design for the replacement of the existing Elk Creek
Bridge in Mendocino County along Hwy 1. Matt led the
design as the Project Engineer to deliver project design updates, Geometric Approval Drawings, right of way
needs, Draft Project Report, Design Standard Decision
Document, and cost estimate. He coordinated with the
various functional units to produce bridge plans,
geotechnical report, environmental studies, traffic
studies, and Environmental Document.

La Loma Rd HBP Bridge Reconstruction | Pasadena, CA
Associate Engineer │ This project involved replacement
of bridge deck; rehabilitation of the arches and spandrel columns; and strengthening the end piers to provide
seismic stability for the La Loma Bridge, widen it to safe and current standards, and provide pedestrian access.

Matt was responsible for drainage design, utility
coordination and preparation of plans and estimate.

McBean Parkway Bridge Widening | Santa Clarita, CA
Associate Engineer │ This project retrofitted and
widened the existing McBean Parkway Bridge from seven
travel lanes to eight travel lanes and closed the gap
between Magic Mountain Parkway and Avenue Scott. The
project constructed a Class I bike trail, and improved
drainage and pedestrian facilities. Matt was responsible for geometrics, drainage design, and PS&E preparation.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Hearst Castle Emergency Roadway Repair PS&E | San
Simeon, CA | Project Engineer
• Holly Street Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Phase II PS&E | Pasadena, CA | Project Engineer
• 10 Bridge Replacements on SR-66 (National Trails
Highway) PA&ED and PS&E | San Bernardino County |
Senior Roadway Design Engineer
• Jonata Road Bridge Rehabilitation PS&E | Santa
Barbara County | Associate Roadway Design Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 29
Darwin Cruz, PE

SENIOR ROADWAY & PARKING LOT

DESIGN ENGINEER
Education
2007, BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Licenses/Certifications
2010, CA Professional Civil Engineer, #C76601
Experience
15 years (All w/ Dokken)
Mr. Darwin Cruz has over 15 years of
experience in engineering design,
permitting, construction support, and
management of transportation and
utility related capital improvement
projects. His breadth of expertise covers the
preparation of project planning reports, preliminary
engineering studies, and PS&E packages for both local
agencies and Caltrans projects. He has been responsible for preparation of contract plans to local and regional standards, developing cost estimates, and support and
coordination for preparation of environmental technical studies and environmental documents. Darwin’s area of
emphasis is in alternatives analysis, roadway/site design, parking lot design, utility relocation and design, stage construction, and development of
Engineer’s Cost Estimates.

I-805/Palm Ave Interchange City of San Diego |
San Diego, CA
Project Engineer/Senior Engineer | Darwin is
responsible for preparation of the PS&E for modifications to improve traffic operations and alleviate future traffic congestion at the I-805/Palm Avenue interchange. The
project includes widening of the Palm Ave roadway and
overcrossing bridge to provide additional storage capacity for dual-left turn lanes at the freeway ramp intersections, widened sidewalks and new Class IV bikeways along Palm
Ave, as well as modifications to the interchange ramps, including a new HOV lane, ramp metering and
intersection traffic signaling. The design also includes pavement rehabilitation and ADA improvements for Palm
Ridge Parking lot as part of mitigation for impacts to the park. Darwin is managing a multi-disciplinary team for
completion of the final design and certification through Caltrans.

East Palomar Street Transit Station, Park & Ride and
DAR at I-805 | Chula Vista, CA
Project Engineer | Darwin was responsible for
development of roadway geometrics, design crosssections, park and ride lot design, grading plans, calculation of earthwork quantities, preparation of slope staking notes, and preparation of construction details for the PS&E contract package. He provided coordination
with SDG&E regarding clearance requirements and
protection measures for construction around existing
230kV overhead electric transmission facilities, and both temporary and permanent relocation of an existing 8” HP gas transmission pipeline. Led coordination with
subconsultants, Caltrans and key project stakeholders
such as the City of Chula Vista, MTS, SANDAG, and the
Otay Water District.

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project | San Diego, CA
Dry Utility Coordinator and Right of Way Engineer |
The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Program improvements
include the $2B 10.9-mile extension of the Trolley Blue Line, double tracking of 4.5-miles of the existing LOSSAN rail corridor, and the new Rose Creek Bikeway connection.

Over $90M of dry utility relocations involving 15 different utility companies were required for the project. Darwin was responsible for coordinating all utility designs with the respective companies, ensuring relocations were
compatible with the combined project improvements,
coordinating traffic control and right-of-way permits for construction of the relocations, preparation, and
monitoring of dry utility relocation schedules, responding to contractor RFI’s, and review/processing of utility
company invoices.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• UC San Diego Miramar and Athena Circle
Improvements | San Diego, CA | Project Engineer
• Preliminary Engineering for UC San Diego Gliderport
Parking Lot Design | San Diego, CA | Project Engineer
• Superior Avenue Pedestrian Overcrossing & Parking
Lot PS&E | Newport Beach, CA | Senior Roadway
Design Engineer
• UC San Diego Revelle Utilities Improvement Project
PS&E | San Diego, CA | Project Engineer
• SR-163/Friars Rd Interchange PS&E | San Diego, CA |
Senior Roadway Design Engineer
• North County Transit District As Needed Civil
Engineering Services Alternatives Analysis & PS&E |
Oceanside & Escondido, CA | Task Order Manager &
Project Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 30
Amanda Konieczka, PE

SENIOR ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
Education
2014, MS Civil Engineering, California State University, Sacramento
2011, BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico Licenses/Certifications
2015, CA Professional Civil Engineer, #C84180
Experience
11 years (10 w/ Dokken)
Ms. Amanda Konieczka has 11 years of
experience in project development and
delivery of transportation projects
throughout California. As a Senior
Engineer, she is responsible for several
aspects of roadway design varying from
project initiation through construction. She has performed roadway engineering tasks including roadway geometric
design, drainage design, traffic control design, quantity calculations, and cost estimating. Her experience also
includes preparation and delivery of planning studies, PS&E packages, utility coordination, grant applications and local assistance documentation. Amanda is very knowledgeable
on both FHWA and Caltrans operations and procedures.

Amanda is well-versed in the requirements of the Highway Bridge Program, and will ensure compliance with AASHTO, Caltrans, and City standards.

Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge
Replacement | Yuba City, CA
Associate Engineer/Drainage Design Engineer │
Dokken worked with the City of Yuba City, the City of
Marysville and counties of Yuba and Sutter to improve
the functionally obsolete Fifth Street bridge conditions and improve traffic operations of Fifth Street by
constructing a new four-lane bridge and reconstructing
both approaches. Amanda was responsible for the
drainage design and many pieces of the roadway design
details; including roadway layouts, barriers, trails,
removal, and accessible ramps to meet ADA. Lastly, she
was responsible for assembling the PS&E package for
each milestone submittal.

SR-132 West Freeway/Expressway Ph 1 | Modesto, CA
Project Engineer | This project is necessary to improve regional and interregional circulation, relieve traffic congestion along SR-132 and improve operations on one
of the most important east-west routes in the Central
Valley. This project will construct a two-lane expressway to reroute SR-132 away from downtown. Amanda was
responsible for the geometric design, identification of right-of-way impacts, and preparation of roadway
improvements plans and estimate.

Nine HBP Bridge Replacements | Nevada County
Roadway Project Engineer | This project replaced 9
bridges within Nevada County. Amanda was responsible
for the roadway design and bridge approaches for the
bridge replacements. She completed the geometric design of the roads using AASHTO guidelines and ensured
minimal right of way acquisition. Amanda provided the
plans, quantity calculations and estimate to reach
completion of the PS&E package. She also completed the
local assistance documentation to secure and procure
funding for the various phases of the projects.
• Garden Bar Road Bridge at Sanford Ranch | The
alignment widened the bridge to the upstream (north)
side, improving the curve radius entering the bridge.
• Garden Bar Road Railcar Bridge | The bridge
replacement alignment constructed the bridge on the
current alignment by relocating traffic to a temporary
creek crossing upstream.

Sexton Road HBP Bridge Replacement |
San Joaquin County
Roadway Project Engineer | This project will replace the existing two-lane Sexton Road Bridge with a new
structure over the SSJID canal. The new bridge will be a single span with a precast prestressed voided slab. The replacement bridge will be longer than the existing
structure to move the abutments onto the canal banks
and allow the new abutments to be constructed behind
the existing abutments. As Roadway Project Engineer,
Amanda is not only responsible for coordinating PS&E,
but also responsible for roadway design and bridge
approaches where access roads are located on all four
corners of the bridge.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Amador City HBP Bridge Replacement PS&E |
Amador City, CA | Assistant Engineer
• Escalon-Bellota Road HBP Bridge Replacement PS&E
| San Joaquin County | Roadway Project Engineer
• Marsh Street HBP Bridge Replacement PS&E | San
Luis Obispo, CA | Associate Rodway Engineer
• Sharon Avenue HBP Bridge Replacement | Redding, CA
| Associate Roadway Engineer
• I-80 Auxiliary Lanes PS&E | Placer County | Roadway
Project Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 31
Richard Sanders, PE

ASSOCIATE ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
Education
2014, BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico Licenses/Certifications
2019, CA Professional Civil Engineer, #C89884
Experience
8 years (6 w/ Dokken)
Mr. Richard Sanders is a California
registered professional engineer with 8
years of experience in civil, roadway,
and trail design. As an Associate
Engineer, he is responsible for several
aspects of roadway design. He has
performed roadway engineering tasks including roadway
geometric design, quantity calculations, plan preparation, exhibit preparation, QA/QC, grading, specifications, and 3D modeling in InRoads, OpenRoads, Civil3D,
Microstation, and AutoTurn.

SR-132 West Freeway/Expressway Ph 1 | Modesto, CA
Associate Design Engineer | Richard assisted with the
preparation of the 35%, 65%, 95%, and 100% PS&E
submittal for the SR-132 Phase 1 project. Richard was
responsible for the 3D modeling, grading design and
calculation of quantities associated with the project. In addition, he assisted with the geometric design using
Caltrans guidelines. This project is necessary to improve regional and interregional circulation, relieve traffic congestion along SR-132 and improve operations on one of the most important east-west routes in the Central Valley.

This project constructed a two-lane expressway to reroute SR-132 away from downtown. The expressway extends
from North Dakota Avenue to SR-99 and Needham Street
along a new alignment, south of Kansas Avenue.

Pezzi Road HBP Bridge Replacement |
San Joaquin County
Associate Design Engineer | This project will replace the structurally deficient Pezzi Road bridge over the Calaveras River with a new 80-foot cast-in-place reinforced concrete slab bridge on a new alignment 250 feet east of the
existing bridge. The new alignment eliminates two 90°
curves in the road and improves safety along the
roadway. Richard is responsible for preparing the PS&E
package for the roadway approaches.

Nevada Street Bridge Replacement | Nevada City, CA
Associate Design Engineer | Richard assisted with the
preparation of the PS&E submittal for the Nevada St.

Bridge Replacement project. Richard was responsible for the 3D modeling, grading design and calculation of
quantities associated with the project. The project
consists of replacing the Nevada Street Bridge as well as the two parking lots effected by the new alignment.

Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge
Replacement | Yuba City, CA
Associate Engineer | Richard assisted with the
preparation of the 100% PS&E submittal for the 5th Street Bridge Replacement. Richard was responsible for the
calculation of quantities and cost estimates associated with the project. Dokken developed an excellent
alignment that balanced engineering, environmental
considerations, flood requirements and cost efficiency to obtain widespread support for the project. The City used federal funding through the HBP and local funding for the preparation of the PSR/PSE. The environmental
documents were signed in October 2014, with final design and right of way commencing in May 2015. The 100%
PS&E submittal was made in May 2017 and the project
completed construction in June 2020. The project was
10% under budget and 10% ahead of schedule
throughout the duration of the project.

I-80 Auxiliary Lanes Final Design | Placer County
Associate Engineer | Richard assisted with the
preparation of the 65%, 95% and 100% PS&E submittal
for the I-80 Aux Lanes project. He was responsible for the 3D modeling, grading design and calculation of quantities associated with the project. In addition, he assisted with the geometric design using Caltrans guidelines. The I-80 Auxiliary Lanes project is part of a comprehensive
transportation improvement plan for the South Placer
regional plan and is critical to “downstream” facilities for southbound traffic on SR-65.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Nicolaus Avenue HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED
and PS&E | Sutter County | Assistant Engineer
• Larkin Road HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and
PS&E | Sutter County | Assistant Engineer
• Nine HBP Bridge Replacements PA&ED and PS&E |
Nevada County | Associate Design Engineer
• Sexton Road HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and PS&E
| San Joaquin County | Assistant Design Engineer
• SR-38/Stanfield Cutoff Roundabout PS&E |
San Bernardino County | Associate Design Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 32
Tony Powers, PE

SENIOR ADA / PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLE

DESIGN ENGINEER
Education
1990, MS Structural Engineering, University of Texas, Austin 1984, BS, Civil Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Indiana Licenses/Certifications
1994, CA Professional Civil Engineer, #C51772
Experience
38 years (13 w/ Dokken)
Mr. Anthony (Tony) Powers is a
California registered professional
engineer with 38 years of experience
in a wide range of projects involving
planning, design, and construction of
highway, railroad and pedestrian bridges
within Caltrans, railroad, and local agency right of way.

Tony is an avid cyclist and specializes in ensuring wellconceived design elements from the trail users’ perspective. He has prepared bicycle and pedestrian
planning studies and master plans. He is a steel bridge specialist and pedestrian facility specialist and an expert on pedestrian and bikeway design criteria and guidance.

Ojai Valley Trail Bridge over San Antonio Creek |
Ventura County
Project Manager │ Preliminary engineering and final
design of a new bridge was provided to replace an
undersized multi-cell box culvert. The new bridge, a 12 foot by 480-foot, 4-span, prefabricated steel bowstring truss structure, is supported on pairs of 3-foot diameter, cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) piles at the abutments, and single, 4-foot diameter CIDH piles at each of the
three piers.

Johnny Cash Bike Trail & Pedestrian Overcrossing |
Folsom, CA
Project Manager │ This project constructed 7,200 linear feet of Class I, multi-use path, the first of two phases connecting the Folsom Historic Truss Bridge to the
Folsom Lake Crossing Trail. Most of the alignment is
within the Folsom Prison property. Key issues for the
project included the incorporation of aesthetic features that met the City’s vision of a Johnny Cash-themed bridge, meeting ADA grade requirements on this hilly alignment
and providing access to the trail across a busy,
uncontrolled arterial. This project required careful
planning of drainage design to avoid right of way and tree impacts, utility coordination, and meeting the safety and security needs of the prison. In addition to his project management duties, Tony was responsible for conceptual
and aesthetic design of the bridge, and
accessibility design.

Oak Parkway Trail Undercrossing | Folsom, CA
Project Manager │ This award-winning project
constructed a grade separated crossing of East Natoma
Street connecting the Oak Parkway Trail with the Johnny Cash Trail. The project included approximately 1,000
linear feet of multi-use path, an undercrossing of East Natoma Street, and the addition of sidewalks along
Natoma Street. In addition to his project management
duties, Tony was responsible for development of the
staging scheme and structural design of the
undercrossing.

Del Rio Trail | Sacramento, CA
Senior Structures/Bikeway Engineer │ This project will
construct 4.5 miles of Class I multi-use path along the former Sacramento Southern Railroad’s Walnut Grove
Branch from south of Meadowview Road/Pocket Road to
north of Sutterville Road, connecting to the Sacramento River Bike Trail at both ends. The multi-use path
preserves the majority of the historic railroad tracks and includes a new bridge over Willow Creek and the addition of a cantilevered path off of the existing Land Park
Underpass, which will carry both the path and an existing excursion train. This project will improve active
transportation access to the South Land Park, Z’Berg Park and Pocket Communities and provide multi-modal
connectivity to adjacent communities throughout the
southern Sacramento area. Tony was responsible for
structures design, ADA compliance and bikeway
conceptual design.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Homewood Trail Bridge PS&E | Homewood, CA |
Senior Bridge Engineer
• River View Development, Bicycle Conformity Analysis
– River West Investments | North Natomas, CA |
Senior Engineer
• Safe Routes to Transit for Bicyclists Study,
Sacramento Area Council of Governments |
Sacramento, CA | Senior Engineer
• Bike Safety Improvement Recommendations along
Folsom South Canal Bike Path | Rancho Cordova, CA
| Senior Engineer
• Bike Safety and ADA Improvements Study (14-miles) |
Rancho Cordova, CA | Senior Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 33
Rosa Griggs, PE

LEAD SPECIFICATIONS WRITER
Education
2001, MS Civil/Structural Engineering, University of California, Davis 1990, BS Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis Licenses/Certifications
1995, CA Professional Civil Engineer, # C54169
Experience
20 years (19 w/ Dokken)
Ms. Rosa Griggs is a California registered
professional engineer with 20 years of
experience designing and checking
bridges and other transportation-related
structures. She serves as a project
manager and engineer and conducts QA/QC
reviews for Dokken’s bridge, structure and roadway
designs. She has an extensive background in design and
specification writing from delivering PS&E on numerous
projects throughout California.

HBP Bridge Replacements | Nevada County
Project Engineer and Specifications Writer | This
project includes four full bridge replacements and one
rehabilitation. Rosa served as Project Engineer and wrote the technical specifications for the following bridges. • Garden Bar Road Bridge at Sanford Ranch |
Project widened and rehabilitated the one-lane, steel
girder bridge over Little Wolf Creek.
• Garden Bar Road Railcar Bridge | Project replaced
the one-lane bridge over the Little Wolf Creek with a
one-lane concrete slab bridge.
• McCourtney Road Bridge | Project replaced the
one-lane railcar bridge over Rock Creek with a posttensioned slab bridge. • Purdon Road Bridge | Project replaced the existing
bridge over Shady Creek with a 2-lane cast-in-place,
post-tensioned voided slab bridge.
• Soda Springs Road Bridge | Project will replace the
existing steel girder bridge with a post-tensioned
cast-in-place slab bridge.

Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge
Replacement | Yuba City, CA
Design Engineer & Specifications Writer | Dokken
worked with City of Yuba City, City of Marysville and
counties of Yuba and Sutter to replace the existing Fifth Street Bridge over the Feather River. The project
improves the functionally obsolete bridge conditions and improves traffic operations of Fifth Street by constructing a new four lane bridge and reconstructing both
approaches. Multi-agency coordination, including
Caltrans, the Central Valley Flood Protection Board and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, was a key factor in
keeping the project on schedule. Rosa designed the
1,868’ bridge over the Feather River. She wrote the
project specifications, which required extensive special provisions due to site and environmental restraints.

Rainbow Bridge HBP Rehabilitation | Folsom, CA
Specifications Writer │ This project rehabilitated the
Rainbow Bridge in the City of Folsom. Spall, cracks, rock pockets, and bridge railing deficiencies were repaired. The bridge deck was treated with a polyester concrete overlay and joint seals installed. The project included in-depth bridge inspection to map deficiencies, environmental
clearance, public outreach, and PS&E development.

Capital SouthEast Connector: White Rock Road |
Sacramento County & El Dorado County
Specifications Writer │ This project is a gap closure from the completed Sacramento County improvements on
White Rock Road to the White Rock Road improvements
in El Dorado County near Latrobe Road. Between Prairie
City Road and Caron Crossing Road, White Rock Road will be reconstructed on a new alignment as a four-lane
expressway with a center earth median and an adjacent
Class I bike/pedestrian trail on the north side of the
alignment. The project is intended to link employment
centers and residential areas in the corridor and
contribute to the remedy for current and future
deficiencies in transportation capacity, safety, and land use compatibility.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• SR-99/Pelandale Avenue Interchange, PS&E |
Modesto, CA | Specifications Writer
• US-101/Los Osos Valley Road Interchange |
San Luis Obispo, CA | Specifications Writer
• 10 HBP Bridge Replacements on SR-66 (National
Trails Highway) PA&ED and PS&E | San Bernardino
County | Project Engineer & Specifications Writer
• Sharon Avenue Bridge Replacement E | Redding, CA
| Project Engineer & Specifications Writer
• City of Los Angeles Seismic Retrofit Program
(10 Bridges) | Los Angeles, CA | Project Engineer
• Redwood Road HBP Bridge Replacement |
Santa Cruz County | Specifications Writer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 34
Ashley Orsaba-Finders, PE,
QSD/P

DRAINAGE & STORMWATER DESIGN LEAD
Education
2012, MBA, Drexel University
2007, BS Civil Engineering, California State University, Sacramento
Licenses/Certifications
2011, California Professional Civil Engineer, #C77894
2011, CA Qualified SWPPP Developer/Practitioner, #21380 LEED AP; Envision SP
California Drinking Water Operator D1
Experience
15 years (5 w/ Dokken)
Ms. Ashley Orsaba-Finders is a Senior
Civil Engineer with 15 years in water
resources engineering, site
development, environmental
engineering, municipal engineering,
planning, GIS analysis, and construction
administration. She is experienced in civil engineer
design, hydraulic modeling, planning, drafting and design of civil engineering projects including drainage, utility design, site design, and pump stations. She also has
extensive experience with modeling and analysis of water and drainage systems using HEC-RAS, CulvertMaster,
StormCAD, CivilStorm, Flow Master, WaterCAD, InfoWater
and other software programs.

Auburn Boulevard Complete Streets Revitalization,
Phase 2 | Citrus Heights, CA
Project Engineer/Lead Drainage Designer | This project
improved Auburn Boulevard in order to upgrade the
corridors image and improve its function as a
transportation facility. Phase I of the project extended from Sylvan Corners to north of the Cripple Creek Bridge. Phase 2 of the project is approximately one mile and begins on the north side of Cripple Creek and ends at Whyte Avenue.

Ashley is responsible for all aspects of the PS&E package, including drainage design and bidding support.

SR-132 West Freeway/Expressway, Ph 1 | Modesto, CA
Drainage Engineer | Ashley was a drainage engineer for
this new freeway in Modesto, CA. Her duties included
leading the drainage design team for this large project including County roads, City roads, and Caltrans facilities.

This project provides connectivity from Hwy 99 in
Modesto west eventually to Interstate 5.

Elk Creek Bridge Replacement (CT 03A2392 TO #16) |
Mendocino County
Task Order Manager and Drainage/Water Quality
Engineer | This project provides planning and design for the replacement of the existing Elk Creek Bridge in
Mendocino County along Highway 1. Ashley leads the
Dokken team as the Task Order Manager to deliver
project design updates, Geometric Approval Drawings,
right of way needs, Draft Project Report, Design Standard Decision Document, and cost estimate. She coordinates
with the various functional units to produce bridge plans, geotechnical report, environmental studies, traffic
studies, and the Environmental Document. She is also the project drainage and water quality engineer.

Avenue 66 Grade Separation over SR-111/UPRR |
Mecca, CA
Drainage Engineer | Ashley was the drainage engineer
for the Avenue 66 Grade Separation over SR-111 and
UPRR project for the County of Riverside and Caltrans.

This effort included compilation of two separate Drainage Reports, one County and one Caltrans, and the design
and analysis of retention basins, detention basins,
ditches, pipelines, inlets, and culverts.

Avenue 66 Water Transmission Main, Phase 1A & 1B |
Riverside County
Drainage Engineer | During construction of the Avenue
66 Grade Separation project, utility relocations performed by IID impacted an existing 12” waterline running along Hammond Road. Ashley assisted with the drainage design
for the relocation plans for approximately 825’ of
waterline, including incorporating the upsizing of the
existing line from 12” to 18”.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Rock Springs Road over Mojave River | PA&ED and
PS&E | San Bernardino County | Sr. Drainage Engineer
• Bear Valley Bridge over the Mojave River | PA&ED
and PS&E | Riverside County | Sr. Drainage Engineer
• East Palm Canyon Drive Bridge Widening | Env Doc
and PS&E | Palm Springs, CA | Sr. Drainage Engineer
• SB-1 Bridge Maintenance On-Call | Orange County |
Senior Drainage Engineer
• SR-38/Stanfield Cutoff Roundabout | Big Bear, CA |
Drainage/Stormwater Compliance Lead
• Orange County On-Call Engineering Services |
Hydraulics/Hydrology & Drainage Designer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 35
Jena Addenbrooke, PE

UTILITY COORDINATION & DESIGN LEAD
Education
2008, BS, Civil Engineering, San Diego State University Licenses/Certifications
2014, CA Professional Civil Engineer, #C82544
Experience
14 years (All w/ Dokken)
Ms. Jena Addenbrooke has 14 years of
roadway design experience,
specializing in the area of utility
coordination. She has extensive
understanding and complies with
FHWA’s regulations and requirements
under Code of the Federal Regulations governing utility relocations to ensure proper and complete utility
clearance prior to Right-of-Way certification. She
communicates clearly and efficiently with utility
companies, municipal utility departments, clients,
Caltrans, and subconsultants to ensure this critical project function is thoroughly and timely addressed.

SR-11/Otay Mesa East Port of Entry Phase 1 |
San Diego, CA
Associate Engineer / Utility Coordinator | The SR-11
Otay Mesa East Port of Entry Phase 1 Project prepares the site for the future port of entry construction. This includes site grading, construction of drainage systems, and utility infrastructure. Jena is assisting with coordination of the SDG&E and Calpine gas main relocations. She is
responsible for preparing and maintaining utility
relocation schedules, reviewing proposed designs and cost estimates, and providing support for applicable right of way and permitting requirements. Jena is also
coordinating service requests for new power, gas,
telephone, and communication services to feed the new
port of entry. She is responsible for coordinating with the various utility representatives in identifying potential service routes and points of connection, preparing, and submitting for service requests, assisting in development of designs, and maintaining new service schedules from
design through construction.

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit | San Diego, CA
Associate Engineer / Utility Coordinator | This project constructed a total of 9 new transit stations, 5 park-andride facilities, 14 new and 2 upgraded traction power substations. The Mid-Coast project required over $80M
in dry utility relocations involving 15 different utility companies, along with new 12kV electrical and telephone services. Construction for this project was completed
November 2021. Jena assisted with coordination of dry
utility relocations for the project. She was responsible for coordinating all utility designs with the respective
companies, ensuring relocations are compatible with the combined project plans, processing traffic control and
right of way permits for the utility owners, developing and maintaining utility relocation schedules, facilitating
coordination meetings with utility companies, and
providing construction support during dry utility
relocations. She also assisted in the development and
coordination of designs for new power and telephone
services to support the new traction power substations, LRT transit stations, LRT signaling equipment, traffic
signals, and irrigation equipment located throughout the project limits. She assisted utility companies with designs and ensuring they were constructible and compatible
with the proposed improvements and existing facilities.

East Palomar Street Transit Station, Park & Ride and
DAR at I-805 | Chula Vista, CA
Assistant Engineer / Utility Coordinator | This project widened the existing Palomar Street bridge overcrossing from a two-lane to four-lane roadway, constructed a new direct access ramp for bus transit & carpools, and
established two new park and ride lots along with a new transit transfer station for the South Bay Bus Rapid
Transit system. Jena assisted in utility coordination during the design phase of the I-805 Palomar DAR project. She
identified potential utility conflicts, prepared pothole plans, monitored potholing activities in the field, and verified utility conflicts for the project. She developed improvement plans for the new 10” recycled water main
in accordance with Otay Water District design standards.

Clearances to overhead SDG&E transmission lines and
underground gas mains were a concern during
construction and design. To protect in place these highrisk facilities, coordination meetings with SDG&E were held to ensure minimum clearances were maintained
during construction and in the final condition. Jena
coordinated with utility companies, construction
managers, and design representatives to ensure conflicts were identified and relocation designs were completed
for Caltrans utility certification.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• SR-76 Widening PS&E | Bonsall, CA | Assistant
Engineer/Utility Coordinator
• SR-78 Eastbound Auxiliary Lanes PS&E | San Marcos,
CA | Utility Engineer/Coordinator
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 36
Joe Ostdiek, PE, TE

ELECTRICAL/LIGHTING DESIGN LEAD,

MEP & FP OVERSIGHT,

ADA / PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLE DESIGN
Education
1999, BS Civil Engineering, San Jose State University
Licenses/Certifications
2003, California Professional Civil Engineer, # C65334
2009, California Professional Traffic Engineer, #TR2508 American Traffic Safety Systems Traffic Control Supervisor (with California Module)
Experience
23 years (20 w/ Dokken)
Mr. Joe Ostdiek is a Senior Signal and
Lighting Design Engineer with 23 years
of experience in the layout, design, and
estimating of modifications to existing
and new traffic signals, street lighting
plans, striping plans, and signing plans. Joe
is familiar with the Caltrans Electrical Systems Design Manual and signing and striping design per the CA
MUTCD. He has completed over 200 electrical, lighting
and traffic signalization projects. As the manager of
Dokken’s Electrical Design Team, Joe leads the traffic
signals and lighting design for all Dokken’s roadway,
interchange, bridge, and trail projects.

Joe , has extensive experience using Lighting Analysts
software AGI-32, and IES Lighting Standards. He has
designed many lighting projects and is familiar with
several lighting manufacturers.

Joe also has extensive knowledge and experience with
ADA rules and regulations, including 2010 ADA, PROWAG
and California Title 24. . He has incorporated bicycle
facilities, including signal, lighting, striping, and signing into many projects and is familiar with Caltrans HDM, CA MUTCD, AASHTO and NACTO standards and guidelines
for bicycle facilities.

Fifth Street over Feather River HBP Bridge
Replacement | Yuba City, CA
Traffic Manager/Lighting and Electrical Designer │
This project dramatically improved the traffic operations of Fifth Street by constructing a new four-lane bridge and reconstructing both approaches. For this project, the City required that traffic be maintained on the existing bridge while the new bridge was constructed. Temporary
facilities for pedestrians were also required. The
weekend closure of Second Street for the erection of
girders was planned with a temporary detour designed
and implemented for traffic management. The
temporary detour worked very effectively to allow safe
installation of the girders. Stage construction also
required the installation of a temporary traffic signal to allow for removal of an existing and construction of a new traffic signal. Construction was completed and the project was opened to the public July 2021. Joe was responsible for signal and lighting design and well as design of the traffic management plan and staged construction.

Amador City Bridge Replacement | Amador City, CA
Street Lighting Design Engineer | Dokken prepared the
PS&E for this project which replaced the existing Main
Street Bridge with a cast-in-place concrete slab bridge, designed to pass 100-year flood events and large enough to place the entire historic City Hall and Fire House on the bridge. The project improved the bridge approach
roadways, including replacing PG&E wood pole mounted
HPS lights with city-owned historic-themed lighting poles and LED fixtures. Joe was responsible for coordination with PG&E for street lighting service point and connection.

Camino Arroyo Bridge, Farrell Avenue Widening, and
Sixth Street Overcrossing | Gilroy, CA
Lighting and Electrical Designer | This project
constructed two structures over the West Branch of
Llagas Creek. The project allows drivers to stay on local roads with a lesser drive time while pulling traffic off US101 and the two interchanges which are already operating at near capacity. The project included
sidewalks, bike and walking paths, and bus stops to
accommodate the multimodal forms of transportation
the residents use, including high percentages of
pedestrians and bicyclists. The first structure is a twospan cast-in-place concrete box-girder bridge over the West Branch of Llagas Creek in Gilroy. This new bridge
carries four lanes of traffic, numerous utilities, bike lanes and sidewalk. The second bridge included modifications
made to the existing Sixth Street Overcrossing over US101 to add a dedicated bicycle bath, separated from vehicular traffic. Joe was responsible for designing the bridge and street lighting. The bridges were lighted with both standard cobra head lighting and decorative lighting.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Golden Valley Road Bridge PS&E | Santa Clarita, CA |
Signal & Lighting Design Engineer
• McBean Parkway Bridge Rehabilitation PS&E | Santa
Clarita, CA | Bridge Lighting Design Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 37
Amy Bakker

ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD
Education
2013, BA, Environmental Science, California State University, Sacramento
Licenses/Certifications
2017, T/E Branchiopod Recovery Permit
Experience
10 years (7 w/ Dokken)
Ms. Amy Bakker, a Senior
Environmental Planner with Dokken, is
responsible for assisting with the
various stages of environmental
compliance including NEPA/CEQA
environmental documents, regulatory
permits, and technical studies. Amy is exceptionally skilled at delivering defensible documents, conducting biological surveys, has strong relationships with the regulatory
agencies, and leads public outreach efforts. She has
experience in assisting with Federal and State of California regulatory permitting and compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Amy is skilled in scoping, inventory, and analysis of environmental and biological resources
that may be impacted by transportation projects. Amy will provide oversight to all environmental sub consultants, including ICF, Dudek, Geocon, and GHD.

Pezzi Road HBP Bridge Replacement | San Joaquin
County
Lead Environmental Planner | This project will replace
the existing two-lane rural road crossing the Calaveras River with a new replacement bridge meeting current
safety and loading standards and realign the roadway
approaches to replace the sharp curves with a new 50-
mph alignment meeting the AASHTO Green Book design
specifications. Amy provided project oversight for all
technical studies required by Caltrans Local Assistance, and preparation of the CEQA initial study with mitigated negative declaration. Construction of the project is
expected to begin in the spring of 2023.

Santa Fe Avenue HBP Bridge Replacement |
Stanislaus County
Environmental Planner | This bridge replacement
project, constructed by Myers, had only a 3-month inwater work window. This project had numerous complicated environmental restrictions due to its seven environmental permits, five listed species, thousands of roosting bats, and a robust population of swallows nesting on the bridge. Amy’s primary responsibilities included
construction monitoring, environmental trainings,
implementing environmental commitments, and
communicating with regulatory agencies, the contractor, and the client regarding the projects process to ensure they remained engaged as an active part of the project
team. Despite the complex environmental nature of the
site, the project team was able to avoid any delays or
change orders related to wildlife species or water quality.

Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation | Palm Springs, CA
Environmental Planner and Environmental Monitor |
This project rehabilitated the existing Bogert Trail Bridge to maintain and upgrade the bridge from a four span Igirder bridge classified as “functionally obsolete”. Amy conducted environmental trainings on potentially
sensitive species, including the Federally Endangered
Casey’s June beetle. In addition, Amy monitored daily
construction, acted as agency liaison, and oversaw
general project management.

Mojave Riverwalk Trail | Victorville, CA
Environmental Planner | This project constructed a multiuse trail along the Mojave River and through Old Town Victorville that connects Victor Valley Transportation Center to Victor Valley College and Mojave Narrows Regional Park.

Amy’s primary responsibilities included project oversight and the preparation of the permits for the project.

Martis Valley Trail | Placer County
Environmental Lead | This project constructed a paved,
multi-use recreational trail connecting the communities of Truckee and Northstar, and ultimately the Lake Tahoe Basin. Amy’s primary role was securing NEPA clearance
through Caltrans Local Assistance and overseeing the
preparation of all required technical studies, as well as acting as agency liaison for Placer County. The project area contained several sensitive Native American sites
resulting in extensive consultation with the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California to mitigate for impacts to
cultural resources. NEPA clearance for the project was
successfully obtained on time and under budget in 2017.

Construction was completed in 2021.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Vinci Avenue Bridge Improvements IS/MND |
Sacramento, CA | Environmental Planner
• Larkin Road Bridge Natural Environment Study
(Minimal Impact) | Sutter County |
Environmental Planner
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 38
Dave Clerici

CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW
Education
1973, BS, University of California, Davis
Experience
49 years (4 w/ Dokken)
Mr. David (Dave) Clerici is a heavy
highway construction project
manager, recently retired from MCM
Construction. Utilizing his extensive
highway, bridge and design-build
experience, Dave supports Dokken on a part-time basis
providing constructability reviews and the “contractors perspective” on unique project challenges. After having developed extensive knowledge of the design-build
process while owner of his own construction company
and during his tenure with MCM, Dave now assist Dokken
with alternative project delivery providing valuable insight during the preparation of construction documents. Most
notably, Dave served as the Deputy Project Manager for
MCM Construction on the wildly successful I 10/605
Design-Build Project for Caltrans District 7.

SR-132 West Freeway/Expressway Ph 1 | Modesto, CA
Constructability Reviewer | This $92M project
constructed 3 miles of new freeway to improve regional
and interregional circulation, relieve traffic congestion along SR-132, and improve operations on one of the most important east-west routes in the Central Valley. The
project included maintenance of traffic on SR-99, 4
bridges, 2 massive MSE walls, CRCP and JPCP pavements
for the mainline of the new freeway and HMA for the local roadways. The design also included a pump station,
stormwater treatment, heavy ITS componentry,
depressed roadway sections, reconstruction of existing
non-standard on- and off-ramps, and utility coordination.

Dave was responsible for evaluating specific aspects of the project for constructability. The project contained a large volume hazardous soil encapsulation making earthflow
critical. Dave evaluated the available clean earthwork
quantities by stage to ensure the project was economically constructible as planned by the designers. Dave also
prepared a detailed working day schedule that offered the bidders adequate time to construct the project, without luxury of allowing too many working days.

I-10/605 Interchange Design Build | Baldwin Park, CA
Deputy Project Manager | This $59 million project
constructed an elevated 3,400’ direct connector from
southbound I-605 to eastbound I-10, replacing the
existing southbound I-605 to eastbound I-10 at-grade
connector. It also constructed the southbound I-605
westbound I-10 connector ramp and Dalewood Street,
directly adjacent to eastbound I-10. The staging and
traffic handling plans accommodated all the existing
traffic lanes with only a few temporary closures. The
project involved extensive coordination for utility
relocations, right of way acquisition, City of Baldwin Park street improvements and an adjacent ongoing contract
for the widening of I-10 through the I-605 interchange.

The design-build team adjusted the construction
sequence so that construction work could begin in the
areas not conflicted with the I-10 project also in
construction. The project included jointed plain concrete pavement for the ramps, MSE retaining walls, ramp
metering, dry and wet utility relocations, sound walls, highway drainage, and landscaping.

Dave played a major role in transforming conditions of
Caltrans’ RFP through alternate designs for city streets and interstate highways into final plans. Unique Bridge design utilized Osterberg Cell for deep CIDH test pile not previously used in Southern California. He was
instrumental in evaluating and resolving construction
schedule issues. Dave drafted, administered, and
constructed multiple owner requests for Contract Change Orders for utility relocation, including 200’ towers to raise LADWP’s main power lines from Hoover Dam to keep the
project on schedule. This project received the Silver
Partnering Award from Caltrans District 7.

ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Green Tree Boulevard Extension over BNSF PA&ED
and PS&E | Victorville, CA | Constructability Reviewer
• Sexton Road HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED and
PS&E | San Joaquin County |
Constructability Reviewer
• Edwards Crossing HBP Bridge Replacement PA&ED
and PS&E | Nevada County |
Constructability Reviewer
• Nine HBP Bridge Replacements PA&ED and PS&E |
Nevada County | Constructability Reviewer
• McHenry Avenue Widening, Phase 2 PA&ED and PS&E
| Modesto, CA | Constructability Reviewer
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 39
Lori Burne, PE, SE

SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
Lori Burne has over 25 years of experience in the structural design, rehabilitation, retrofit, inspection, and construction of buildings and bridges. She is familiar with AASHTO and Caltrans’ current design standards and detailing formats. She has field construction experience in both highway bridges and building structures having provided construction support and inspection services. Building work includes analysis, design, detailing, retrofit, strengthening and condition assessment of timber, CMU, URM, concrete, structural steel, aluminum, and light gage steel framing. Transportation work includes the structural design and independent check of bridge, culvert, and retaining wall structures, seismic analysis, project specifications, condition assessment of existing bridges, construction inspection, advance planning studies, and software development for bridge and culvert structures.

EDUCATION: Master of Science, Civil Engineering, UC Davis Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, UC Davis
REGISTRATION: CA SE #S6053, CA PE #C58412

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Fixins Soul Food Restaurant, Sacramento, CA
Provided complete structural calculations and plans for a timber addition to an existing masonry building for a new restaurant. The existing two-story building was modified using steel frames and other structural strengthening measures for the new and existing loads on common walls. New steel awnings and a masonry sound wall were included in the project.

Provided construction support including coordination with MEP contractors.

Mackinaw Hotel, Placerville, CA
Provided structural analysis, design, and details for new 4-story hotel including outdoor event center on 4th floor. Framing is timber and structural steel with reinforced concrete retaining walls and a concrete slab foundation. Construction Assistance and Structural Observation to be performed during construction phase.

Taylor Lynn Apartments, Cloverdale, CA
Provided structural analysis, design, and details for a new 2-story, 22-unit apartment complex with timber wall, floor, and roof framing. Site improvements included CMU trash enclosures and reinforced concrete retaining walls. Lower-level garages and cantilevered balconies required extensive detailing to accommodate fire separations.

Papin Commercial Center, Vacaville, CA
Provided structural analysis, design and details for new Extra Mile gas station convenience store, car wash, Retail Building, and foundation for prefab fuel canopy and trash enclosure. Retail building and convenience store are timber framing, carwash and trash enclosure are CMU, and Fuel Canopy is steel with deep foundation.

Fuller Lofts, Sacramento, CA
Provided analysis of existing concrete, masonry, and timber 3-story building for the remodel of the upper-level space to create multi-family apartments over the Fox and Goose restaurant. Provided complete structural calculations, plans, and details. Construction included the addition of an elevator for accessibility, steel awnings, , new wall and floor framing, heavytimber truss modifications, and alterations to facilitate MEP improvements. Construction occurred while the Fox and Goose remained continuously open to customers.

Placerville Old City Hall Rehabilitation Study, Placerville, CA Prepared Feasibility Study to obtain a current construction cost estimate of the work required to bring the existing historic building into compliance with current code requirements. The Study included structural, accessibility, life safety, hazardous materials abatement (e.g., lead paint, asbestos), and MEP for the building shell in preparation for future tenant improvements. Three rehabilitation construction options including cost estimates, were presented to the City.

SENIOR BRIDGE ENGINEER
Ms. Iley, with Burne Engineering for ten years, has well over 20 years of experience in the design, analysis, EQ retrofit, rating, strengthening, and rehabilitation of highway bridges and incidental structures. She also has experience in the design of movable and fixed railway bridges. She has worked as a bridge engineer in the private industry for Greiner, URS, and Willdan Engineering, and for Caltrans as a Structures Representative in Districts 6 & 12. She has performed many maintenance inspections and prepared preventative maintenance reports for bridge structures. Ms. Iley combines an extensive design background and construction experience within Caltrans, which both lend invaluable insight into the process of developing biddable, buildable PS&E packages. Molly’s experience in design, construction and maintenance of bridges gives her the professional expertise to provide owners comprehensive project care, from project management to design, from QA/QC to construction.

Ms. Iley has built knowledge of Caltrans’ current design standards and detailing formats as well as Caltrans’ procedures for local assistance projects via extensive practical hands-on experience. Ms. Iley is responsible for developing the plans, specifications and estimates for bridge structures including retrofit, rehabilitation, and widening of; highway, rail, and pedestrian bridges, and incidental structures including retaining walls, sound walls, box culverts, sign structures, and pumping plants. Ms. Iley has prepared structure Special Provisions, Engineer’s Estimates, Advance Planning Studies, Type Selection Reports, Feasibility Studies, Peer Reviews and constructability reviews. She has worked closely on the PS&E phase of hundreds of bridge structures throughout her professional career. Ms. Iley is well-versed in the funding mechanisms available to local agencies and the appropriate procedures required for each. Through experience, Molly thoroughly understands the entire process from the perspective of the project funding agencies, local agencies, permittees, contractors and engineers.

EDUCATION: B.S. Civil Engineering – 1988, CSU Sacramento LICENSURE: Professional Civil Engineer: California (#C50995), Florida (#60593)

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Smith River Bridge- Detour, PM 36, SR 101 – Del Norte County, CA Molly Iley provided the Independent Check bridge structural analysis of the substructure PS&E of the six-span, 40 ft. wide by 1000-ft. long bridge which is part of the detour for the replacement bridge. The new bridge was designed by the “Complex Design Branch” of Caltrans and is anticipated to be in use for at least three years during construction of the permanent replacement. The substructure supports are two 60”-diameter CIDH shaft columns at the abutments, and four piers. The pier columns have an 8’x8’x8’ capital bearing support at the top. The abutment shafts are designed to support the roadway, 22’ above the original ground, with a soldier pile and beam retaining system. Also included was the check of four soldier pile retaining walls. Software used was LPile, and VBridge. Each support location required analysis of a unique soil profile. The independent design check was performed under a challenging deadline, starting in January and ending in April 2021; completed the first submittal within six weeks.

Chanticleer Avenue Bike/Ped Overcrossing, Santa Cruz County | Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission
Ms. Iley performed the Independent Check of the structure PS&E of the new bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing at Chanticleer Avenue over Route 1 in Santa Cruz County for the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission. The 642’ long by 16’ wide pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing is a cast-in-place reinforced concrete box girder structure that crosses over Route 1. The overcrossing structure is comprised of 7 spans. The abutments are seat-type abutments supported on 24” diameter CIDH piles. The bents are 3’-6” dia. single columns on 5’-6” dia. by 40’ deep CIDH shafts. Seismic conditions required vertical design consideration.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 41
Professional Summary
With over 12 years of public outreach and community relations experience, Margaret Meadows has worked with clients on diverse projects throughout the Southern California region. Margaret serves as the lead of Arellano Associate’s construction division, working alongside agencies, construction management firms, and contractors.

Margaret has expertise in construction and transportation public outreach, project management, marketing and branding, inter-agency and client relations, social media management, event management and content development. She is responsible for the development and implementation of strategic public outreach programs.

Project Experience
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Crenshaw/LAX Transit Project, Los Angeles, CA
The Crenshaw/LAX Transit Project will travel 8.5 miles serving communities in the cities of Los Angeles County, including Inglewood, and El Segundo, and provide riders with significant access and connectivity within the Metro Rail system, municipal bus lines, and other regional transportation services. Margaret serves as the Project Manager, leading and supervising staff that supports the public outreach component of Metro’s construction phase.

Metro, Purple Line Section 3 Project - Tunnels, Los Angeles, CA (May 2021 – Present) The Purple Line Extension is a new rail subway corridor expansion project in Los Angeles County extending the Metro Purple Line from its current terminus at Wilshire/Western station further west into Westwood. This rail extension project is critically important to the expansion of public transportation availability in Los Angeles County and will provide a high-capacity, high-speed, and more dependable travel alternative for commuters. Margaret serves as the Project Manager, leading and supervising staff that supports the public outreach component of Metro’s Design-Build phase.

Metro, Sepulveda Transit Corridor Feasibility Study, Los Angeles County, CA The project was a 20-month feasibility study focused on identifying a program-level strategy to address transportation needs for the Sepulveda Pass. Margaret served as the Senior Project Coordinator for this project and was responsible for compiling all outreach effort results and drafting meeting summary reports for the client. Margaret also coordinated outreach and logistics for the project’s public meetings.

Margaret Meadows
Public Outreach Lead

Education
Bachelor of Science,
Business Administration,
University of Massachusetts,
2009
Years with Arellano Associates
3 Years of Experience
12 Areas of Expertise
• Project Management
• Construction Outreach
• Social Media
Management
• Strategic Planning
• Creative Material
Development
• Marketing
• Campaign Management
• Event Management
• Community Relations
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 42
Professional Summary
Thomas Reese serves as a Senior Project Coordinator and provides strategic public outreach services for a variety of planning, construction, and general transportationrelated projects. His responsibilities include strategic communication and message development, inter-agency relations, marketing, event coordination and implementation, project organization, collateral material development, and graphic illustration design. Thomas is skilled at leading overall project outreach efforts and team members, virtual meeting planning, and broadcasting efforts.

Project Experience
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Purple Line Extension Section 3 – Tunnels, Los Angeles, CA
As one of Metro’s priority construction projects, the Purple Line Extension is a critically important rail project that will provide a high capacity, high-speed and dependable alternative for commuters to travel between downtown Los Angeles and West Los Angeles Thomas is the primary point of contact for developing critical construction impact outreach materials. Additionally, Thomas develops detailed traffic control maps and construction notices that are then distributed directly to residents and local businesses.

San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) I-10 Corridor Express Lanes Design Build, San Bernardino, CA
The I-10 freeway is a critical transportation corridor used by residents, businesses, and visitors. This design-build project provides approximately 10 miles of express lanes along the I-10 in each direction from the Los Angeles County line to the I-15.

Thomas attends meetings for the various disciplines and frequently visits the jobsite to further understand ongoing construction activities. He also meets with construction staff to discuss work schedules, potential public impacts, and traffic control plans for planned closures.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), I-10 Design-Build Rehab Project, Coachella Valley, CA
This project includes pavement rehabilitation and safety improvements to I-10 along thirteen miles of freeway. Thomas has assisted in developing a Public Information Plan. Thomas acts as the primary outreach liaison between the public and the construction management team. He also assists staff in developing website and social media content, graphics, and project collateral materials.

Thomas Reese
Senior Public
Outreach Project
Coordinator
Years with Arellano Associates
4 Years of Experience
8 Areas of Expertise
• Construction Outreach
Specialist
• Construction Liaison
• Survey Engagement
• Collateral
Development
• Data Analysis
• Public Outreach
Engagement
• Task Lead for Online
Engagement
Strategies
• Graphic Design
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 43
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 44
Eric Brown, PE, GE

GEOTECHNICAL LEAD
Registrations California, Geotechnical Engineer, GE 2806, 2007 California, Civil Engineer, PE 60249, 2000
Years of Experience 29 years (26 years with EMI)
Education MS, Civil Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1995 BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1993 Mr. Brown’s experience includes geotechnical investigation, design, and analysis. He has prepared many Foundation, Geotechnical Design and Materials Reports for bridge foundation design, embankment design, roadway pavement sections, culvert corrosion, and standard and special design sound walls and retaining walls. He interacted with Caltrans reviewers and prepared written responses to Caltrans review comments to obtain final approvals of various reports. He is familiar with equipment used in field explorations and Caltrans protocols for encroachment permits and site safety. Mr. Brown was previously employed as a project manager with a drilling contractor giving him an eye for constructability. His project experience includes:

California Incline Replacement, City of Santa Monica, CA. Senior Geotechnical Engineer for the California Incline, which is a combination cut roadway and sidehill viaduct that scales the bluff from PCH to Ocean Avenue just north of the I-10/PCH Intersection. Provided geotechnical services during seismic evaluation, advance planning, and type selection phases of the project. Conducted field explorations, consisting of several borings and performed laboratory soil testing. Prepared a Preliminary Foundation Report (PFR) for the PSR phase. Worked closely with the designer and coordinated with the City of Santa Monica and Caltrans.

Sixth Street Viaduct Replacement Project, Los Angeles, CA. Senior Engineer. The existing Sixth Street Viaduct, constructed in 1932, is a signature bridge for the City of Los Angeles with 45 spans covering a length of over 3,100 feet. The bridge is being replaced primarily due to deteriorating concrete (Alkali Silica Reaction) and seismic vulnerability. Oversaw foundation design and development of design and construction recommendations for the new bridge. Performed a constructability review of structure foundations and prepared foundation construction specifications. Supervised review and preparation of response to contractor submittals, RFI’s and change order requests.

El Portal Pedestrian/Bicycle Underpass, Encinitas, CA. Geotechnical Project Manager/Principal Engineer. The project consists of construction of a pedestrian/bicycle underpass to provide a grade separated crossing for bicycles and pedestrians across the NCTD/LOSSAN railroad tracks. Additional improvements include sidewalks, retaining walls, stormwater control devices, utilities, and landscaping. Managed the field exploration and performed field infiltration testing.

Performed engineering analyses to develop design and construction recommendations and prepared a foundation report.

El Camino Real Bridge Replacement Project, San Diego, CA. Geotechnical Project Manager. The project includes widening part of El Camino Real to four lanes and replacing the existing bridge over the San Dieguito River. Coordinated the geotechnical investigation consisting of multiple borings and CPT soundings including geotechnical borings through the deck of the existing bridge to avoid entering an environmentally sensitive lagoon. Geotechnical deliverables for the project included a Foundation Report submitted and approved by Caltrans due to HBP funding and a Geotechnical Design Report for earthwork, drainage improvements and structural pavement sections.

Buckman Springs Widening/Replacement, San Diego County, CA. Project Manager. Widening/replacement study of the existing 455 ft. long, eight span Buckman Springs Bridge over Cottonwood Creek. Scope of work included conducting geotechnical field investigation and laboratory testing program, evaluating existing structure foundation capacity and stiffness and providing design and construction recommendations for widening and replacement alternatives.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
Total
26 With ICF
17 Jessica is a federally qualified professional (36 CFR 61) in the fields of historic preservation, architectural history, and preservation planning with more than 20 years of professional experience. She has been extensively involved in the management of and participation in cultural resource investigations in compliance with NEPA, National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and other federal, state, and local cultural resource regulations. Jessica is an expert at research and analysis of architectural resources, with a focus on transportation, engineering, and industrial resources. Jessica specializes in the analysis and preservation of historic bridges. Her responsibilities have included directing a survey team for the Caltrans statewide historic bridge inventory update, evaluating the historical significance of bridges and potential project effects on bridges in Santa Monica, Los Angeles, Pasadena, and Redding, California, as well as Portland, Oregon.

EDUCATION
MA, Historic Preservation Planning, City & Regional Planning, Cornell University BA, History (minor in Art History), William Smith College

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
Historic Preservation, Architectural History,
Preservation Planning

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
Professional Memberships: National Trust for Historic Preservation; California Preservation Foundation; Los Angeles Conservancy Professional Development: Section 4(f) Compliance for Historic Properties, National Preservation Institute, 2013; Section 106: A Review for Experienced Practitioners, National Preservation Institute, 2012; Beyond Compliance: Historic Preservation in Transportation Project Development, National Highway Institute, 2008; Preservation of Historic Bridges, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2004; CEQA and Historic Resources, California Preservation Foundation, 2003; Mitigating Environmental Impacts: Law, Policy, and Practice, University of California, Los Angeles, Extension Program, 2001

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Santa Monica Pier Bridge Replacement Project—City of Santa Monica, CA 2014 – Present Architectural Historian/Subject Matter Expert. Jessica identified cultural resources present within the project area, evaluated potential project-related impacts on those resources, and provided mitigation measures. The 1939 Pier Bridge is at the end of its useful life, and the City of Santa Monica proposed to replace it. This complex project requires coordination between local, state, and federal agencies and addressing community concerns, while protecting those historic properties, providing better access for pedestrians and cyclists, and designing a safe and innovative replacement.

Mojave River Bridge Projects—Caltrans District 8 and City of Barstow, San Bernardino County, CA 2018-2019 Architectural Historian/Subject Matter Expert. The City of Barstow, in coordination with Caltrans, proposed replacement the existing bridges over the Mojave River (Bridge No. 54C-0089, constructed 1933) and Mojave River Overflow (Bridge Number 54C0090, constructed 1939) along N. First Avenue in the city of Barstow. Both bridges were previously categorized as ineligible for listing in the NRHP in the Caltrans Historic Bridge Inventory. Jessica conducted additional thematic research in her preparation of a reevaluation of the Mojave River Bridge.

Highland-Redlands Regional Connector (On-Call Environmental Services)—Caltrans District 8, & the cities of Highland and Redlands, CA
2018
Architectural Historian/Subject Matter Expert. The Cities of Highland and Redlands, in cooperation with Caltrans, jointly planned to improve the non-motorized transportation network by constructing regional bikeway and walkway trails. Bicycle and pedestrian improvements would be constructed along 4.7 contiguous miles of streets and easements in the cities of Highland and Redlands.

Jessica was responsible for the identification and evaluation of bridges along the Santa Ana River in the project area.

Mount Vernon Avenue Bridge Replacement Project—Caltrans District 8 & City of San Bernardino, CA 2004-2006 Architectural Historian. Jessica prepared a supplemental Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) and a Finding of Effect (FOE) for the proposed widening and seismic retrofit of the Mount Vernon Avenue Bridge, which was previously found eligible for the NRHP.

She worked closely with the geographic information systems (GIS)/graphics staff at ICF, project engineers, Caltrans District 8, and City employees to prepare an area of potential effect (APE) map that met the satisfaction of those parties. In addition, Jessica researched the demolition of a historic structure within the APE as required by Caltrans for submittal with the revised HPSR and met regularly with bridge engineers and environmental staff from Caltrans District 8 to discuss relevant issues. As this project will cause an adverse effect, Jessica also prepared a Memorandum of Agreement.

Historic Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program— Caltrans District 7 & the City of Los Angeles, CA 2002-2006 Architectural Historian. Jessica worked with engineering design consultants who participated in a Citywide bridge improvement program. The proposed projects included seismic retrofit upgrading, lane widening, and rehabilitation. Federal Highway Administration’s Historic Bridge Repair and Rehabilitation Program’s funded the program, which triggered the need for environmental clearance. As Caltrans District 7 provided oversight, Jessica prepared documentation in accordance with Caltrans requirements, such as HPSRs, Historical Resources Evaluation Reports, and a FOE.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 47
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 48
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 49
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA RFP for a Caltrans Federally Funded Project – Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033) PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060 PAGE 50
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Exhibit “E”
Oaks Initiative
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

CITY OF SANTA MONICA OAKS INITIATIVE DISCLOSURE FORM
In order to facilitate compliance with the requirements of the Oaks Initiative, the City compiles and maintains certain information. That information includes the name of any person or persons who is seeking a “public benefit.” If the “public benefit” is sought by an entity, rather than an individual person, the information includes the name of every person who is: (a) trustee, (b) director, (c) partner, (d) officer, or has (e) more than a ten percent interest in the entity.

Public benefits include:

1. Personal services contracts in excess of $25,000 over any 12-month period;

2. Sale of material, equipment or supplies to the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month period;

3. Purchase, sale or lease of real property to or from the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month period;

4. Non-competitive franchise awards with gross revenue of $50,000 or more in any 12-month period;

5. Land use variance, special use permit, or other exception to an established land use plan, where the decision has a value in excess of $25,000;

6. Tax “abatement, exception, or benefit” of a value in excess of $5,000 in any 12- month period; or

7. Payment of “cash or specie” of a net value to the recipient of $10,000 in any 12- month period.

Name(s) of persons or entities receiving public benefit:

Name(s) of trustees, directors, partners, and officers:

Name(s) of persons with more than a 10% equity, participation, or revenue interest:

Prepared by: Title:

Signature: Date:

Email: Phone:

FOR CITY USE ONLY:

Bid/PO/Contract # Permit #
Dokken Engineering, Inc.

Richard A. Dokken | Owner
Richard T. Liptak | CEO
John A. Klemunes, Jr. | President
Cathy Chan | Vice President & Secretary
Bradley B. Dokken | Vice President & CFO
Matthew N. Griggs | Vice President
Juann Ramos | Vice President
Richard A. Dokken | Owner
John A. Klemunes, Jr., PE President
09/22/2022
[email protected] 916-858-0642
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Exhibit “F”
Living Wage
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

LIVING WAGE ORDINANCE
Certification for Providers of Services to the City of Santa Monica (Fiscal Year 23/24 – July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024)

TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL CONTRACTORS PROVIDING SERVICES TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA IN EXCESS OF $54,200
The City of Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 4.65, Living Wage Ordinance (LWO), establishes a Minimum Wage of $19.73 per hour for certain employees of contractors providing services to the City where services exceed $54,200 or more and requires that contractors also provide the same health care and other benefits to employees’ same sex spouses and domestic partners as are provided to other employees’ spouses.

An employee covered by the LWO is any person who does not actually work as a manager, supervisor, or confidential employee, and who is not required to possess an occupational license.

The Living Wage Ordinance applies the services sought pursuant to this bid and bidders are required to prepare and return the Living Wage Certification Form. If the bidder is selected, the bidder must maintain payroll records that include, at minimum, the full name of each employee providing services under the contract, job classification and rate of pay. Bids that fail to include Certification Forms may be considered nonresponsive and excluded from further consideration.

Please prepare the following certification if you are a contractorengaging ina contract for services with the City of Santa Monica in excess of $54,200.

Your signature on this certification grants the City permission to review any and all payroll books and records and any company documents pertaining to the benefits offered to employees to assure your compliance with the LWO during the term of the contract.

Please direct any questions to:

City of Santa Monica Finance Department
Attention: Living Wage Compliance Section
1685 Main Street, Mail Stop 09
Santa Monica, CA 90401
You can also contact staff regarding living wage ordinance questions by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone 310-458-8281.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Exhibit “G”
Insurance Requirements
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 1 Insurance Requirements
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.

Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal and advertising injury, with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (Insurance Services Office Form CG 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and Code 9 (non-owned), with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits and Employers’ Liability Insurance with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease (see footnote #1).

4. Professional Liability: Insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession with limits of no less than $5,000,000 per occurrence.

If the Consultant maintains broader coverage or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Santa Monica requires and shall be entitled to any broader coverage and higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Santa Monica.

Other Insurance Provisions

1. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
a. Additional Insured Status: The City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 2 connection with such work or operations. CGL coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CG 20 10 11 85, or if not available, through the addition of a combination of (1) CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38 and (2) CG 20 37).
b. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this Agreement, the Consultant’s insurance shall be primary coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Offices Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. c. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required herein shall state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after notice has been given to the City of Santa Monica.
d. Waiver of Subrogation: Consultant hereby grants to the City of Santa Monica a waiver of any right of subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City of Santa Monica by virtue of payment of any loss. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Santa Monica has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Santa Monica. The City of Santa Monica may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide satisfactory proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City of Santa Monica.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in California with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Santa Monica.

Claims Made Policies

1. If the Professional Liability policy provides “claims made” coverage:
a. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of this Agreement or the start of work.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 3 b. The insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 7 years after completion of work.
c. If the policy is cancelled or not renewed, and not replaced with another “claims made” policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the effective Agreement date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of 5 years after completion of work.

Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City of Santa Monica with original certificates and amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage provided by this clause). All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Santa Monica before work commences. However, failure to obtain required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them.

The City of Santa Monica reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including the endorsements required herein, at any time.

Failure to Maintain Insurance Coverage
If Consultant, for any reason, fails to maintain insurance coverage which is required pursuant to this Agreement, the same shall be deemed a material breach of contract. The City of Santa Monica, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from the Consultant resulting from said breach.

Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein. All exceptions must be approved in writing by the Risk Manager.

Footnotes
# 1: Workers’ Compensation insurance coverage is not required if the Consultant does not have employees. The Consultant must, however, execute the City’s Workers’ Compensation Coverage Exemption Declaration Form.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Exhibit “H”
DBE Commitments
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O2
Consultant Contract DBE Commitment
EXHIBIT 10-O2 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT

1. Local Agency: 2. Contract DBE Goal:

3. Project Description:

4. Project Location:

5. Consultant's Name: 6. Prime Certified DBE:  7. Total Contract Award Amount:

8. Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants: 9. Total Number of ALL Subconsultants:

10. Description of Work, Service, or Materials
Supplied

11. DBE
Certification
Number

12. DBE Contact Information

13. DBE
Dollar
Amount
Local Agency to Complete this Section

14. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION
$ 930,317.49 20. Local Agency Contract
Number:

21. Federal-Aid Project Number:

22. Contract Execution
Date:

Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on this form is complete and accurate.

23. Local Agency Representative's Signature 24. Date

25. Local Agency Representative's Name 26. Phone

27. Local Agency Representative's Title

22.37%
IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required.

15. Preparer's Signature 16. Date

17. Preparer's Name 18. Phone

19. Preparer's Title
DISTRIBUTION: 1. Original – Local Agency

2. Copy – Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract execution may result in de-obligation of federal funds on contract.

ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Santa Monica City CouncilSeptember 30, 2025

Santa Monica City Council
September 30, 2025