Cities Index.
Agenda packet, first session

Santa Monica City Council
May 12, 2026

Document
Agenda packet, first session
Meeting
May 12, 2026
Body
Santa Monica City Council
Pages
3
Original file
150.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santamonicacityca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

City of Santa Monica
City Council Meeting
AGENDA

CAROLINE TOROSIS
MAYOR

ELLIS RASKIN JESSE ZWICK

COUNCILMEMBER MAYOR PRO TEM

DAN HALL BARRY SNELL

COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER

LANA NEGRETE NATALYA ZERNITSKAYA

COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER
OLIVER C. CHI

CITY MANAGER

HEIDI VON TONGELN

CITY ATTORNEY

DENISE ANDERSON-WARREN

INTERIM CITY CLERK

STANDARDS OF BEHAVIOR THAT PROMOTE CIVILITY AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS:
• Treat everyone courteously; • Embrace respectful disagreement and dissent as democratic rights, inherent components of an inclusive
public process, and tools for forging sound decisions
• Hate has no place in Santa Monica. The City opposes
abusive or threatening hate speech, intolerance, or
dehumanization, and supports basic civil respect and
human decency.
• Listen to others respectfully;
• Exercise self-control;
• Give open-minded consideration
to all viewpoints;
• Focus on the issues and avoid
personalizing debate;
Regular meetings are broadcast live on CityTV cable channel 16 and on the internet at santamonica.gov. Cable television re-broadcasts air on Thursday and Saturday at 11:30 AM. The agenda will air on CityTV on Saturday and Sunday at 11:00 AM and 6:00 PM, and on Monday and Tuesday at 12:30 PM and 6:00 PM.

City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 2

RULES OF ORDER FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS (Resolution No.11663(CCS))

WAYS TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT
If you are interested in providing public comment at a City Council meeting, there are several ways to participate:
(1) Written public comment. In lieu of oral public comment, the public is strongly encouraged to submit written public comment on agenda items via email to [email protected]. For written public comment submitted by 12:00 pm on the day of the meeting, best efforts shall be made to have them available online for viewing. Please note the agenda item number in the subject line of your written comments.
(2) Oral public comment.
- In-person: Persons wishing to address the City Council regarding items on the agenda must be present and submit their name and address (optional) to the City Clerk before the public comment section is opened for that item or before the public hearing is opened where one is required by law. Register to speak at the Speaker Kiosk prior to the meeting. - Telephone: Persons wishing to address the Council by telephone must register at santamonica.gov/public-comment no later than 5:00 p.m. the day before a meeting. Showing electronic presentation materials are not permitted when commenting by telephone.

Oral public comment from any one individual is limited to a total of 6 minutes per City Council meeting, with a maximum of 2 minutes per agenda item if speaking on multiple items. A member of the public may allocate time between items in one-minute increments up to 2 minutes and those requesting to speak on only one agendized item for the meeting may speak for up to 4 minutes on that one item. Except for noticed public hearings or quasi-judicial items, if more than 25 speakers are registered to speak during a public input section, the amount of time shall be reduced to 1 minute per speaker during that section.

Except for the author of the request, public comment on 15-items are limited to 1 minute.

Levine Act Disclosure. Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt Code Section 84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $500 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made. Information regarding the Levine Act can be found here or you can contact the FPPC.

ORDER OF BUSINESS (may not be changed except by majority vote of the City Council.)

1. General Public Input
(Members of the public may address the City Council
only on items not on the agenda, but within the
subject matter jurisdiction of the City and on Special
Agenda Items.)

2. Special Agenda Items (Commendations and
Proclamations presented).

3. Public Comment for Consent Calendar and Closed
Sessions Only.

4. Consent Calendar (All items considered in one
motion unless removed by a City Councilmember for
discussion. No public comment is permitted on
second readings.)

5. Closed Sessions.

6. Public Comment on remaining Agenda Items

7. Study Session.

8. Continued Items.

9. Administrative Proceedings.

10. Ordinances:
• 1
st Reading
• 2
nd Reading (No public comment is
permitted on second readings.)

11. Staff Administrative Item.

12. Public Hearings.

13. Reports of Boards and Commissions.

14. Resolutions.

15. Written Communications (Other than
Reports of Commission and Officers.)

16. Councilmember Discussion Items.

Agendas and reports are accessible on the City's webpage at smgov.net/council/agendas. They are also available at the City Clerk's Office and in alternate formats upon request. For a free email subscription to the City Council Agendas, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (310) 458-8211 or [email protected].

Si desea comunicarse con alguien en español, llame a nuestra oficina al (310) 458-8211 y pida hablar con Esterlina Lugo.

City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 3

AGENDAS

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

REGULAR MEETING

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1685 MAIN STREET, ROOM 250,
TUESDAY, MAY 12, 2026
MEETING BEGINS AT 5:30 PM

HOW TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT BY TELEPHONE
Persons wishing to address the City Council by telephone must register at santamonica.gov/public-comment no later than 5:00 p.m. the day before a meeting.

Donation of time and showing electronic presentation materials are not permitted when commenting by telephone.

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE / LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

ROLL CALL
City of Santa Monica Statement of Accountability (Land Acknowledgement) The City of Santa Monica is located on the land of Tovangaar. With great respect, the City acknowledges the Gabrieleño/Tongva as the First People of this ancestral and unceded territory of Kuruvungna, a village that we know as Santa Monica. We honor their elders, past and present, and the Gabrieleño descendants who are part of the Gabrieleño /Tongva tribes.

We recognize that these peoples are still here, and as settlers and kuyam (guests), we recognize our responsibility and obligation to care for their land in partnership with them.

The City of Santa Monica commits to work in partnership with the Gabrieleño/Tongva people to uplift their voices and visibility on their ancestral land.

LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS / PROCEDURAL

MOTIONS

1. GENERAL PUBLIC INPUT AND COMMENT ON SPECIAL AGENDA ITEMS (For regular meetings, public comment is permitted on Special Agenda Items and items not on the agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. State law prohibits the City Council from taking any action on items not listed on the agenda, including issues City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 4 raised under this agenda item. For special meetings, public input is limited to scheduled Special Agenda Items only.)

1.A. Written Comments

2. SPECIAL AGENDA ITEMS

2.A. Proclamation: Mental Health Awareness Month

2.B. Proclamation: Public Work's Week/Bike Month

3. PUBLIC INPUT (ITEMS UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR AND CLOSED SESSION ONLY)

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items will be considered and approved in one motion unless removed by a Councilmember for discussion. In accordance with Charter section 615, the adoption of all ordinances and resolutions shall be by reading of title only unless a Councilmember present dissents. No public discussion is permitted on ordinances for second reading and adoption.)

4.A. Award Bid #4507 to Clean Energy Corporation for Renewable Liquid Natural Gas Fuel for the Department of Transportation
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and a finding of no possibility of significant effects pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Award Bid #4507 to Clean Energy Corporation to provide renewable liquid natural gas for the Department of Transportation; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Clean Energy Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $7,279,967, including a 10% contingency, for a five-year period, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

4.B. Approval of the First Modification to Agreement # 11757 with RAMCO Corporation for As-Needed General Contractor Services
City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 5 Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a first modification to Agreement #11757 (CCS) in the amount of $200,000 with RAMCO Corporation for asneeded general contractor services for the Public Works Department. This will result in a new total amount not to exceed $550,000, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

4.C. Approval of Third Modification of Agreement #10757 with Waysine, LLC for Parts and Continued Cellular Service for Existing Real-Time Signs at Big Blue Bus Stops and Shelters for the Department of Transportation Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction) and a finding of no possibility of significant effects pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a third modification to agreement #10757 (CCS) in the amount of $74,600 with WaySine, LLC, for parts and continued cellular service for existing real-time signs at Big Blue Bus stops and shelters for the Department of Transportation. This will result in a nineyear amended agreement (10 years if the option is exercised) with a new total amount not to exceed $1,052,325 (including the option year), with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

4.D. Authorization to Apply Previously Approved Consumer Price Index (CPI) Increase for Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District Recommended Action
Staff recommends that City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

2. Confirm and authorize the application of the previously approved Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment to the Main Street Area Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District resulting in a 3.2 percent adjustment based on the Los Angeles–Long Beach–Anaheim CPI for the 12-month period ending June 2025.

4.E. Award Bid #SP2687 to National Pools, Inc. for Construction Services for Phase 2 of the Annenberg Community Beach House Pool Tile Replacement Project for the Public Works Department
City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 6 Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Award Bid #SP2687 to National Pools, Inc. to provide construction services for Phase 2 of the Annenberg Community Beach House Pool Tile Replacement Project for the Public Works Department; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with National Pools Inc. in an amount not to exceed $369,000 (including a 10% contingency).

4.F. Award Bid #SP2764 to PALP, Inc. dba Excel Paving Company, RAMCO General Engineering Contractor, Inc., Sully Miller Contracting Company, and Paveco Construction, Inc. for On Call General Contractor Services for Public Works Maintenance and Repair Projects
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Award Bid #SP2764 to PALP, Inc. dba Excel Paving Company, RAMCO General Engineering Contractor, Inc., Sully Miller Contracting Company and Paveco Construction, Inc. for On-Call General Contractor Maintenance and Repair Services for the Public Works Department; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute five-year agreements with the following four contractors: PALP, Inc. dba Excel Paving Company, RAMCO General Engineering Contractor, Inc., Sully Miller Contracting Company, and Paveco Construction, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 for each agreement, over a five-year term, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

4.G. Approve Agreement with Fire Apparatus Solutions for Fire Department Apparatus Original Equipment Manufacturer Parts and Service Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and a finding of no possibility of significant effects pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Fire Apparatus Solutions (FAS) to provide Original Equipment Manufacturer parts and services for medium and heavy-duty Kovatch Mobile Equipment fire apparatus for the Fire Department. This recommended award is made as an exception to the competitive bidding process pursuant to Section 2.24.250 (b) and is for a total amount not to exceed $650,000 over a five-year period with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

4.H. Approval of Second Modification to Agreement # 11035 With Vital Medical Services, LLC, to Provide In-House Medical Services to Arrestees City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 7 Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a second modification to agreement #11035 in the amount of $900,000 with Vital Medical Services, LLC, to provide in-house medical services to arrestees for the Police Department.

This will result in a 7-year amended agreement with a new total amount not to exceed $3,813,000 with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

4.I. Approval of Revisions to the Santa Monica Boulevard Safety Study and Adoption of the Plan
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of categorical exemptions pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) and Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Approve revisions to the Santa Monica Boulevard Safety Study and adopt the plan; and

3. Direct staff to proceed with the phased implementation of the Safety Study recommendations.

4.J. Award RFB #4511 to AAA Oil Inc., dba California Fuels and Lubricants, for Purchase and Delivery of Renewable Diesel Fuel for the Public Works and Fire Departments - New Item Received 5/8/2026
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Award Bid #4511 to AAA Oil, Inc. dba California Fuels and Lubricants for the purchase and delivery of diesel fuel for the Public Works and Fire Departments; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with AAA Oil, Inc. dba California Fuels and Lubricants for a total amount not to exceed $2,797,154 over a five-year period, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

4.K. Adoption of Resolution Ratifying Homelessness Emergency Proclamation - New Item Received 5/8/2026
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Adopt the proposed resolution ratifying the 2025 Proclamation of the City City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 8 Council of the City of Santa Monica Declaring a Local Emergency on Homelessness.

4.L. Adoption of Local Roadway Safety Plan - New Item Received 5/8/2026 Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect and a finding of categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15262 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Adopt the attached 2022 Local Roadway Safety Plan.

5. CLOSED SESSIONS

5.A. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1):
- New Item Received 5/8/2026
John U.N.B. Doe, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 23STCV12746; John Doe 1, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 23STCV15009; Hector Orozco v. John Doe: Does 1-2; LASC # 23SMCV03120; John JPC Doe v. Doe City, et al.; LASC # 23STCV22020; John AD Doe, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 23STCV26548; John CW Doe, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 23STCV29623; John Doe (A.G.) v.

Santa Monica Police Activities League, et al; LASC # 23SMCV06066; John GA DOE, et al. v.

City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV06484; John U.L.W. Doe, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV06768; Joseph Garcia v. Santa Monica Police Activities League, et al.; LASC # 24SMCV01368; John Doe 15, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV07647; John Doe 18, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV0239; John RR Doe, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV09398; John Doe 33, et al. v.

City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV15580; John Doe 48 v. City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV15420; John Doe 49 v. City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV19296; John DD Doe v. City, et al.; LASC # 24SMCV04421; Jane EB Doe, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV24146; John Doe (V.D.) v. Santa Monica Police Activities League, et al.; LASC # 24SMCV05049; John Doe (D.F.) v. Santa Monica Police Activities League, et al.; LASC # 24SMCV05050; John Doe (D.G.) v. Santa Monica Police Activities League, et al.; LASC # 24SMCV05051; Jane Doe 13, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV27233; John AM Doe, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV28433; John Doe v. City, et al.; LASC # 24SMCV05527; John Doe 53 v. City, et al.; LASC # 24STCV31763; John Doe (Y.M.) v. Santa Monica Police Activities League, et al.; LASC # 24SMCV06355; Jane Doe 16, et al. v. a Public Entity, et al.; LASC # 25STCV02235; John Doe 62, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 25STCV04414; John Doe 23 v. City, et al.; LASC # 25STCV05850; John Doe (E.B.) v. Santa Monica Police Activities League, et al.; LASC # 25STCV06354; Jane PB Doe, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 25STCV06880; John Doe 67 v. City, et al.; LASC # 25STCV10142; John Doe 68 v.

City, et al.; LASC # 25STCV12089; John Doe 69, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 25STCV14031; John OR Doe, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 25STCV16251; John RD Doe, et al. v. City, et al.; LASC # 25STCV24158 - New Item Received. 5/8/2026

5.B. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1):

City v. ICSOP, et al.; OCSC # 30-2022-01261243 - New Item Received 5/8/2026 City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 9

5.C. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1):

City of Santa Monica, et al. v. Waymo LLC et al., LASC # 25SMCV06581 - New Item Received 5/8/2026

5.D. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1):

Santa Monica EV Holdings, LLC et al. v. City, LASC # 25SMCV06681 - New Item Received 5/8/2026

5.E. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1):

Waymo LLC v. City, LASC # 25SMCV06541 - New Item Received 5/8/2026

5.F. Conference with legal counsel - significant exposure to litigation - Government Code § 54956.9(d)(2) – 1 case (1213 Pine Street) - New Item Received 5/8/2026

5.G. Conference with real estate negotiator – Gov. Code § 54956.8: properties: 200 Santa Monica Pier, Santa Monica, CA; City of Santa Monica; City negotiator:

Oliver Chi, City Manager; parties to negotiate with: Fever Lab, Inc.; under negotiation: price and terms of payment for license - New Item Received 5/8/2026

5.H. Conference with real estate negotiator – Gov. Code § 54956.8: property: 200 Santa Monica Pier, Santa Monica, CA, Beach Parking Lot 1 North, Sandbox North (approximately 15,000 square feet of sand area north of the Beach Bike Path/Lot 1 North to Lifeguard Tower 14 and bordered by the beach bike on the east to the Pacific Ocean on the west); City of Santa Monica; City negotiator:

Oliver Chi, City Manager; parties to negotiate with: LA Kings (Outdoor Game); under negotiation: price and terms of payment for license - New Item Received 5/8/2026

CITY MANAGER REPORT

TRAVEL ANNOUNCEMENT AND MAYOR'S HIGHLIGHT

6. PUBLIC INPUT ON REMAINING AGENDA ITEMS
. Public Input for 12-Items will be heard at the time when the Public Hearing is called.

7. STUDY SESSION
No items

8. CONTINUED ITEMS
No items

9. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 10 No items

10. ORDINANCES
(Public comment is permitted on ordinances for introduction and first reading. No public discussion is permitted on ordinances for second reading and adoption. In accordance with Charter section 615, the adoption of all ordinances and resolutions shall be by reading of title only unless a Councilmember present dissents.)
No items

11. STAFF ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS

11.A. Adoption of a Resolution Amending the Policies for Boards and Commissions and Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance amending and establishing various Boards and Commissions Resulting from the 2025 Comprehensive Review and Establishment of a Restorative Justice Commission - New Item Received 5/8/2026
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Introduce for first reading the attached ordinance to: amend sections regarding the Public Safety Reform Oversight Commission, Arts Commission, Disabilities Commission, and Human Services Commission to establish a new Housing and Human Services Commission; add new sections converting the Urban Forest Task Force into a Commission and establish a new Restorative Justice Commission;

2. Adopt the attached resolution amending various sections on the Policies for City Boards, Commissions, Committees, Task Forces, and Regional Advisory Boards, and repealing Resolution No. 11510 (CCS);

3. Review and provide direction on information requested at the January 13, 2026 Council meeting, and an alternative option for the Disabilities Commission; and

4. Adopt a finding that the recommended actions herein do not constitute a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

12. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items

13. REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
No items

14. RESOLUTIONS
No items

15. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OTHER THAN REPORTS OF COMMISSION AND

OFFICERS
City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 11 No items

16. COUNCILMEMBER DISCUSSION ITEMS

16.A. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Measure GS Resident Oversight Committee for a term ending on June 30, 2029 - New Item Received 5/8/2026

16.B. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Housing Authority Board for a term ending on June 30, 2026. (Continued from 03/24/2026) - New Item Received 5/8/2026

16.C. Request of Councilmember Hall that Council approve use of up to $5,000 of discretionary funds to support the Santa Monica Public Library’s LEGO Club programming - New Item Received 5/8/2026

16.D. Request of Councilmembers Hall, Snell, and Mayor Torosis that Council approve use of up to $10,000 of Council discretionary funds, on a 1:1 matching basis, to support Santa Monica High School’s Legado Latino and Black Student Union in offsetting expenses incurred for graduation activities for participating students - New Item Received 5/8/2026

ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and reports are accessible on the City's webpage at www.smgov.net/council/agendas. They are also available at the City Clerk's Office and in alternate formats upon request. For a free email subscription to the City Council Agendas, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (310) 458-8211 or [email protected].

Members of the public unable to attend a meeting but wishing to comment on an item(s) listed on the agenda may submit written comments prior to the meeting by meeting by mailing them to: City Clerk, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401 or to [email protected]. Written comments received from the public by 12 PM on the day of the City Council meeting will be distributed to the City Council prior to the meeting and posted online. Members of the public who submit written public comment on an agenda item may be subject to the Levine Act which requires disclosure of campaign contributions of more than $500 to an officer of the City within the preceding 12 months.

City Hall and the Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations to either attend or provide public testimony at a Council meeting (i.e. sign language interpreting, access to an amplified sound system, remote option, etc.), please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (310) 458-8211 or TDD: (310) 917- 6626 or via email at [email protected] at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Best efforts shall be made to accommodate requests received after the 72-hour deadline. In the case of special meetings, requests should be submitted as early as possible, but no later than noon the day of the special Council meeting.

Si desea comunicarse con alguien en español, llame a nuestra oficina al (310) 458-8211 y pida hablar con Esterlina Lugo.

City of Santa Monica Generated: 5/12/2026 12:39 PM Page 12 Santa Monica Blue Bus Lines #1, #2, #3, #5, #9 and the EXPO Line serve City Hall.

Parking is available on Main Street, on Olympic Drive, and in the Civic Center Parking Structure (validation free).

City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: May 12, 2026
Agenda Item: 1.A
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, Interim City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Written Comments
Prepared By: Mitchell Kois, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Written Comments

1.A
Packet Pg. 13
1 David Yakobson
From: Alex Calderon <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 8:05 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Alex Calderon
Brea
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 2 David Yakobson
From: noam drazinfamily.com <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 10:24 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Noam Drazin
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 3 David Yakobson
From: Jason Laird <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 10:25 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jason Laird
211 Paseo De Granada, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 4 David Yakobson
From: Scotty Weber <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 10:27 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a local resident who lives near the airport and is employed by one of the flight schools On site. I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life (and livelihood) is directly shaped by the airport, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses right outside our doors. Why are the businesses located at the airport? Any less important than those
elsewhere? A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, while pushing out revenue generating businesses for our economy.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

Furthermore, the introduction of JSX airline service has been revolutionary. Every flight I have m flown on JSX out of Santa Monica has been full, and it has become my go to for much of my travel, saving me time, headache, and challenge of going to LAX. JSX has provided convenient travel options for the city and its residents while generating revenue.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 5 Scotty Weber
Mar Vista
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 6 David Yakobson
From: Bradley Larson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 10:32 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Bradley Larson
North hollywood
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 7 David Yakobson
From: Jillian Brunon <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 10:44 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jillian Clayton
Del Rey (Santa Monica born and raised)

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 8 David Yakobson
From: Amir Blachman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 10:58 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Amir Blachman
Sherman Oaks and Playa Vista
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 9 David Yakobson
From: Tyler DeOms <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 11:11 PM
To: Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Natalya Zernitskaya; Oliver Chi; Peter James; Susan Cline; [email protected]; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Tyler DeOms
Montana Ave
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 10 David Yakobson
From: Jamie Marie Davis <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 11:11 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jamie Marie Davis
Wilshire-Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 11 David Yakobson
From: Tedd R. <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 11:16 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Theodor Rossi
Sunset park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 12 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 12:03 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Zoltan
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 13 David Yakobson
From: Christian Boettcher <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 12:49 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

I did most of my pilot training at SMO in the 90s and flew many medical evacuation flights and medical transport flights out of the airport. SMO served and serves a crucial role to keep aviation going and educate the next generation of aviators.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Christian Boettcher
Mar Vista
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 14 David Yakobson
From: (null) (null) <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 1:02 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Ralph Strahm
Sent from my iPad
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 15 David Yakobson
From: Kevin Meyers <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 5:54 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Kevin Meyers
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 16 David Yakobson
From: David G. <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 6:15 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Council member,
I am a volunteer at the Santa Monica Museum of Flying and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

I feel an operational airport preserves culture of the historic area, and is an asset for the city.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
David Giammarco
Sawtelle
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 17 David Yakobson
From: bill marley <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 6:22 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Bill Marley
Mid City
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 18 David Yakobson
From: DAVID STILLER <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 6:29 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Stiller David
Best wishes ,
Dave Stiller
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 19 David Yakobson
From: Ehab Hanna <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 8:28 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Ehab Hanna
Get Outlook for iOS
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 20 David Yakobson
From: Joyce Urode <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 8:33 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Joyce Urode
santa monica
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 21 David Yakobson
From: OPP-Info <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 8:54 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Kevin Scannell
Ocean Park
[email protected]
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 22 David Yakobson
From: Justin Rosin <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 9:10 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: Santa Monica Airport - Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I hope this email finds you well! I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

Santa Monica was a vital ad-hoc airport during the LA wildfires in January 2025. It is a haven for budding pilots and respectable community members. In fact, during COVID and the double Hollywood strikes, many creatives who lost work turned to Santa Monica Airport to support themselves. It breathed new life into the entertainment industry (amongst many others). Think about how much better our world would be if every industry modeled itself off of the remarkable standards of the aviation industry? This airport is the beating heart of SoCal and it has helped connect us to the world. I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to the residents and do not close the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Justin Rosin
San Fernando Valley
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 23 Justin Rosin | Composer
(m) 908.456.1756
[email protected]
www.justinrosin.com
Los Angeles | New York
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 24 David Yakobson
From: Douglas Glover <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 9:17 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Doug Glover
Playa vista
Douglas Glover
Cinematographer
310-429-4174
douglasglover.com
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 25 David Yakobson
From: Californiaceo25 <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 9:19 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
17 years ago when my amazing daughter was about three years old, I started taking her to SMO. We would sit out by the tarmac for hours and listen to the control tower overhead welcoming in the pilots and their flights and directing them to their runway and wishing the pilots taking off, a safe flight.

We did this consistently for years… And when Megan was about five years old, she asked me to write “an airplane book”. I wrote a children’s book called 10 amazing airplanes… A countdown book… And we continued our visits sometimes having her equally amazing younger brother Morgan join us.

I would take the kids to the museum of flying… And of course, Clover Park, which has always been terrific.

I’ve seen the additions of the dog park… Barker hanger and all of the amazing events that are held there and certainly bringing in as does SMO, excellent revenue for the city which helps our residents and the local and surrounding communities as well.

Megan is now an honor student at Santa Monica College, where I also attended and eventually taught psychology.

And Megan has 20 hours in towards obtaining her pilots license! I am well aware as someone who has lived in and around Santa Monica for decades… Even now just a block and a half from SMO… That there are countless numbers of families and individuals who have such a wonderful stories to tell about Santa Monica airport.

I strongly feel with its rich history that it should actually be declared some type of historical entity or property so that it cannot be destroyed or closed.

There is plenty of Parkland around… Housing does not need to be built on every square inch of available land… Which would bring the city some revenue granted… But truly just make landlords more wealthy… It is not the addition to the city that it’s cracked up to be.

There is a vocal minority that has always wanted to close SMO… Their perspective remains one that is very close minded. And in this case, it is not a question of keeping SMO open meaning then there will be no space, etc. etc. because the park space already exists Councilmember.

Traffic is already a nightmare in and out of Santa Monica, including Ocean Park Boulevard and certainly Bundy/Centinella and Walgrove… Adding additional traffic is not only environmentally harmful… But disrespectful of and harmful to on many levels… Local residents as well as folks driving in and out of the area. More pollution… More cars… More traffic…
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 26 I am well aware that I am just one of countless numbers of people who have such history with SMO… They have brought and continue to bring their own children there… You see the wonder in their eyes and the joy and happiness in their faces as they point and look at the planes that are coming in or revving up and moving out.

This is not a place to destroy.

This is not a place to chop up into pieces to please this part of the crowd and that part of the crowd when you end up displeasing all parts of the crowd.

The numbers don’t lie. The revenue. The huge majority of locals who want Santa Monica airport kept open.

Yours is to respond with a guiding eye and a wise hand to the majority. This is clear: preserve Santa Monica airport.

Sincerely,
Steve Gincig
Ocean Park
310-400-2056
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 27 David Yakobson
From: Rashely R <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 9:22 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Rashele Rodriguez
Best,
Rashele Rodriguez
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 28 David Yakobson
From: Liza Lerche Jensen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 9:32 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Liza Lerche Jensen
Volunteer and supporter of Angel Flight West, Santa Monica Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 29 Free Flights for Those in Need
angelflightwest.org
90049
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 30 David Yakobson
From: Garey Wittich <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 9:46 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Garey Wittich
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 31 David Yakobson
From: Katie Jorgenson <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 9:51 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing as a aviation student at Santa Monica Airport. I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries.

During the urban fires last year it was an invaluable resource for firefighting helicopters. Sadly it seems this is something we will need more of in the future.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Right now the only thing keeping LAX flight paths away from Santa Monica is the Santa Monica Airport and the use as general aviation. Ironically if it closes this will probably lead to a lot more noise for residents. In addition most of the businesses would likely move to Van Nuys airport - an already heavy traffic airport in close proximity to the Burbank Airport. (And according to the NTSB the likely source of a mid air collision due to the volume of flights between the two). It would also mean a loss of funds going into Santa Monica and around nearby local businesses.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 32 Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Katie Jorgenson
West Hollywood / student at KSMO
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 33 David Yakobson
From: Mark Holtzman <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 10:35 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Mark Holtzman
President
West Coast Aerial Photography, Inc.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 34 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Howell <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 10:52 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Mar Vista resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Nancy Howell
Mar Vista South of airport
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 35 David Yakobson
From: Alex Johnson <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 10:59 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing urging you to reconsider the decision to close the airport at the May 12 meeting.

I write as a resident with no personal economic interest in the airport, or any park. There are three reasons to keep the airport open.

1. The airport supports businesses, and a climate of business more generally. Santa Monica has a fiscal emergency and it needs to attract business. Closing a center of business first makes no financial sense, but it also sends a message of business unfriendliness — the opposite of what we should be doing. I recognize there is noise, but I live in view of the beach and regularly hear police and coastguard helicopters: it goes with the location, and one of the things about Santa Monica that makes it special is that it is a city, and not merely a commuter town.

2. The city is already very well provided for in terms of parks and recreation spaces: Palisades Park, the beach, and even for residents living near the airport, Clover Park and of course Airport Park. But, there is also Reed Park, and most notoriously, Tongva Park. The latter is all-but abandoned by residents, used almost exclusively by the homeless. Councilmembers will be aware the water features have been turned off. In short, the city has many parks, but it also has some notable failures. In this time of budgetary pressure, it makes no sense to commit to more spending, when the track record of managing the facilities we do have for the benefit of residents is as patchy as it is.

3. I have touched on the fiscal situation already, but this project is not fully-funded, will be very expensive, and the city’s ability to attract private investment to fund such a project in partnership is not well-illustrated by the vacancy rate on the Promenade. But it is also a one-way street: once closed, we cannot reopen the airport. We risk losing a jobs-creating source of business, and finding ourselves left with a patch of blighted land that cannot be used for its original purpose, with no funds to be found to transform it.

Councilmember, everyone likes the idea of more parks, like they like the idea of a free all-you-can-eat buffet. I too am in favor of having cakes, and eating them. That does not mean this plan is sensible. It isn’t: it is economic vandalism to a real asset we have, in favor of more of a thing we already have in abundance, unfortunately not all well-maintained for residents, and uncertainty as to who will pay for it.

I urge you not to let the existence of a plan substitute for evaluating whether it's a good one: it simply isn’t.

Let’s keep the airport open: vote for jobs, and fiscal prudence, not a park that looks lovely in renderings but which the city can neither afford to build, nor maintain
Yours sincerely,
Alex Johnson
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 36 301 Ocean Ave Apt 202
Santa Monica CA 90402-1583
+1-917-244-4667
[email protected]
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 37 David Yakobson
From: Jared Wiener <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 11:44 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jared Wiener
Wilmont
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 38 David Yakobson
From: william price <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 11:56 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open. The city does not have the money to tear down the existing facilities, nor does it have the money to build a large park,, nor does it have money to maintain such a park. Also the city already has a water shortage. The park would require patrols day and night to keep out neighboring gangs. It is a source of income now, but would be a financial drain if built The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
William Price
Ocean park
Sent from my iPad
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 39 David Yakobson
From: Cameron McVicker <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 12:19 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Cameron
Sunset park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 40 David Yakobson
From: Linda Bozung <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 12:28 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Linda Bozung
Ocean Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 41 David Yakobson
From: Janis Leishman <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 12:58 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected]; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit. This will increase traffic, pollution and congestion in an already heavily trafficked area and will attract more homeless. The Santa Monica Airport has been here for decades-what will happen in an emergency? I would limit the hours and jets (which they have already implemented) even though the airport has been here before all the residents. They bought homes near the airport and should have done their due diligence before buying. Why does the airport have to close because the residents made the wrong choice for them? Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Janis Leishman
Santa Monica
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 42 Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 43 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 1:20 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits. My main concern is the fiscal impact on the city.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the city at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit. I wonder how many people that live here came in part because the airport is here.

I hope the city will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Sincerely,
Arnold David Sobol
Wilmont
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 44 David Yakobson
From: Rockstar rover <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 2:25 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Paul Davis
Pilot at Whiteman Airport
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 45 David Yakobson
From: ALISA BUNTING <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 2:54 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport -- KEEP IT OPEN!

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport OPEN while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport. KEEP IT OPEN! KEEP IT OPEN! KEEP IT OPEN! KEEP IT OPEN! KEEP IT OPEN! KEEP IT OPEN! KEEP IT OPEN! KEEP IT OPEN! KEEP IT OPEN! Everyone I speak with in my neighborhood regarding the airport — they all want it to remain OPEN! Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Alisa D Bunting
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 46 Alisa Bunting
[email protected]
Cell: 310-569-5499
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 47 David Yakobson
From: Ken Sax <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 3:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Ken Sax
National Blvd & Barrington Blvd
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 48 David Yakobson
From: Shari Phillips <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 4:04 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Shari Phillips
NOMA
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 49 David Yakobson
From: Christina Wioch <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 5:10 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Dan Hall
Subject: Santa Monica Airport

EXTERNAL
I would like to add my support for preserving the Santa Monica Airport. The airport should be grandfathered as a landmark. It was there first, and if residents did not like the idea of living near an airport, why did they buy homes there? I believe it is important for emergency services. I have yet to meet anyone who wants to see it closed down, so there must have been something amiss with the vote. It appears only a minority actually want this.

I also feel that the park that is being planned for that space would turn into a large homeless campground, or worse. I live next to the much smaller Virginia Avenue Park and see the issue every day, I don't believe there could ever be enough policing or supervision to keep this under control. Residents who actually do want the airport gone may want it back when their relatively peaceful neighborhood becomes a noisy, congested magnet for crime.

Thank you for listening to my opinion.

Respectfully,
Christina Wioch
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 50 David Yakobson
From: Paul Valenstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 6:25 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Paul Valenstein
Santa Ana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 51 David Yakobson
From: Francisco J Avila <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 7:43 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Francisco J Avila
(424) 421-4988
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 52 David Yakobson
From: Lauren Wyka <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 7:52 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

I live in Sunset Park and it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on.

A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing extreme budget challenges, and would likely take many, many, many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any of us residents sees a single benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses.

That support is visible in all of us sending letters and attending the meetings. Please listen to the residents.

This is an opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city!
I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents who live and work here, and avoid rushing toward closing the airport to satisfy a few.

Let’s be smart about this and think about the real true benefits the airport offers and will offer in the future to the Santa Monica community, business community, and revenue and as a hub of aviation technology and clean air mobility.

Please listen to the majority of residents.

Sincerely,
Lauren
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 53 David Yakobson
From: Nancy <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 7:55 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Nancy Kearsley
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 54 David Yakobson
From: Judy Sheridan <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 7:55 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Judy sheridan
Sunset park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 55 David Yakobson
From: Deidre Powell <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 7:56 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Deidre Powell Wilson
North of Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 56 David Yakobson
From: Monica M <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 9:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Monica Moore
Sunset park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 57 David Yakobson
From: Michael Landman <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 10:30 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Michael Hankin
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 58 David Yakobson
From: Ian Dutton <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 1:18 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I live near the Santa Monica Airport and strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits. The airport today is a good neighbor and offers opportunity to share its space with compatible community uses.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Ian Dutton
Venice
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 59 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 9:01 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember, I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits. As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit. Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community. I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby. Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport. Thank you for your service to our community. Sincerely, William Bonner 2117 pier ave 31 years and counting
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 60 David Yakobson
From: Sean Phillips <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 9:20 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Sean MacLeod Phillips
North of Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 61 David Yakobson
From: Evan Green <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 10:00 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Evan Green

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 62 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Evan Green | The MBS Group
Executive Vice President
M: 213.400.6060
[email protected]

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 63 David Yakobson
From: Ross W. Prout <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 10:54 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident writing to strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while thoughtfully exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live immediately next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica unique. We should not make an irreversible decision that could negatively impact jobs, local businesses, and city revenues that help fund the services residents rely on every day.

A park-only option would create enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges. It could take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see meaningful public benefits.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support preserving the airport while also creating additional park space and community amenities. That support is becoming increasingly visible.

At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and many residents spoke in favor of a balanced approach that keeps aviation while expanding public access and open space.

Speakers also highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to become a leader in next-generation clean air mobility and aviation innovation. Electric “Uber-style” air transportation is still in its infancy, but it is clearly advancing and will likely become far more common in the years ahead.

Santa Monica Airport is uniquely positioned to serve as a future hub for this emerging technology because the infrastructure already exists, the aircraft are significantly quieter, and Los Angeles is already preparing to showcase advanced air mobility during the 2028 Olympics.

Rather than eliminating this valuable asset, Santa Monica has the opportunity to shape how cleaner and quieter aviation can responsibly coexist with expanded public space and community benefits.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding meaningful public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 64 Sincerely,
Ross W Prout
Wilmont area of Santa monica
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 65 David Yakobson
From: Jose Ramirez <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 12:07 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jose Ramirez
Downtown Los Angeles
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 66 David Yakobson
From: Whitney Gram <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 1:13 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Los Angeles resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

When we first moved to Los Angeles, the Santa Monica quickly became a source of refuge and fun for our whole family. We would come weekly to watch the many airplanes taking off and flying, my son was one at the time and is now six, and he still loves going to the airport with our two year old daughter now. We were crushed when we learned this joyful place, was going to be taken away from the community.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Whitney Gram
Westdale
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 67 David Yakobson
From: zachary chamberlin <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 2:08 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
zach chamberlin
Sunset Park
Sent from my iPhone please excuse any typos. Thanks
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 68 David Yakobson
From: Andrew Williams <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 2:36 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Andrew Williams
Ocean park and 28th
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 69 David Yakobson
From: GRANT GERHART <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 3:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Grant Gerhart
Professional Pilot
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 70 David Yakobson
From: Jacquie Nemor <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 3:59 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a life-long Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. It is ludicrous to have a park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

The City must take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jacquie Nemor
Ocean Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 71 David Yakobson
From: Ryan Haid <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 4:45 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Hi City Council,
I'm writing in support of keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

SMO is historic and decisions about its future have wide-reaching implications. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and it would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit. I think we can all agree we do not want the space to sit empty.

More importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We've all seen the recent poll showing nearly 70% in support of the airport.

However, I recently had the chance to witness this in person, canvassing around Santa Monica for several hours a few weekends ago. I spoke to dozens of residents and was surprised to find the majority of them are in favor of keeping SMO open. In fact, many of them shared fond memories of SMO over the years and agreed that a hybrid approach that keeps our critical aviation infrastructure intact and avoids extended closure/unmanageable cost would be the best approach.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Warm regards,
Ryan Haid
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 72 David Yakobson
From: Norb Taylor <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 6:22 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Norbert Taylor
Sunset Park, 30th Street
Get Outlook for iOS
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 73 David Yakobson
From: hkhavari <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 6:47 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Hoda khavari
North of Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 1 David Yakobson
From: Kat <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 6:38 PM
To: Code Enforcement; councilmtgitems; Attorney Mailbox Subject: URGENT (Follow Up) Extreme Car Shop Noise

EXTERNAL
Hello,
I am writing to formally document a critical failure in the enforcement of local noise ordinances and public health protections. For an extended period, the automotive repair facilities situated within my immediate residential vicinity have operated with a flagrant disregard for both the statutory limitations of their business hours and the physiological wellbeing of the community.

Despite exhaustive attempts to resolve this matter through Code Enforcement and various municipal departments, the situation remains entirely unaddressed.

The nature of this disturbance is twofold:
• Temporal Violations: These establishments frequently operate high-decibel machinery well beyond their scheduled hours and past the legal evening thresholds established by city code. • Acoustic Extremity: Even during permissible hours, the volume of the noise is of such intensity that itis physically painful and constitutes a clear violation of public health standards regarding decibel exposure.

It is a profound disappointment to find that the systems designed to maintain the safety of our neighborhoods appear indifferent to such persistent violations. I am formally requesting a definitive intervention—specifically, a noise level assessment and a rigorous audit of the operating permits for these specific locations.

I trust that this correspondence will be met with the gravity it requires and that I shall receive a detailed response regarding the specific actions your office intends to take.

Respectfully,
Kat Sukel
2501 Pico Blvd
Santa Monica
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 2 David Yakobson
From: Elijah Wells <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 1:17 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: Agenda Item 1 don’t close the airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Elijah Wells
Pacific Palisades
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 1 David Yakobson
From: Robert Jacobson <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 10:39 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 5/12/26 - SMO Represents Critical Infrastructure and Economic Opportunity

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
I'm writing to urge the Council to reconsider the rush toward closing Santa Monica Airport and instead pursue a balanced approach that preserves critical infrastructure while expanding community benefits.

Critical Infrastructure We Just Proved We Need
Last year's wildfires unequivocally demonstrated why SMO matters. A few years ago, the city designated SMO as critical infrastructure in our disaster preparation plan. That designation wasn't ceremonial.

Imagine the next disaster scenario when freeways are blocked and you've eliminated the only functional runway for emergency operations.

The Financial Reality Nobody Wants to Discuss
Using Tongva Park's completion costs as a baseline (adjusted to current dollars), you're looking at roughly $2 billion for the Great Park. That excludes demolition, environmental cleanup, sports facilities, recreation buildings, and every other amenity the community envisions. Realistic all-in cost: $3-6 billion, with millions in annual maintenance thereafter.

Where is this money coming from?
The city faces serious budget challenges. A bond measure is unviable. There are insufficient revenue sources to service the debt, and property owners will reject tax increases. No philanthropist will donate billions for this project. You are setting yourselves up for a massive unfunded liability.

Meanwhile, the airport could operate successfully and even profitably with proper management from aviation, business, and finance professionals who understand the operation.

Unintended Consequences
As SMO traffic decreased, commercial pilots report that LAX-bound aircraft are descending lower into the Santa Monica airspace, directly over homes. In December alone, heavy aircraft approaches were lowered by 5,000 feet. Residents notice the difference, particularly with early morning arrivals from Asia and Australia. Complete airport closure will exacerbate this problem significantly.

The Opportunity You're Missing
You have 190 acres to work with.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 2 For context, the Luxembourg and Tuileries Gardens in Paris total 110 acres combined. The city can absolutely have beautiful park space while maintaining critical infrastructure.

More importantly, you can reimagine SMO as a next-generation community asset:
 Zero-emission electric aviation: Already operating at SMO with zero noise and zero pollution  STEM education and workforce development: Partner with Santa Monica College to train residents for careers in sustainable aviation and advanced air mobility  Innovation hub: Provide space for engineers and entrepreneurs building sustainable transportation technology companies
 Emergency response: Maintaining national security and disaster response capabilities just proved essential
 Park amenities: Integrate recreational space within the site  Jet aircraft noise already decreased 81%. Electric training aircraft operate daily. Affordable electric passenger aircraft are nearing certification. These aren't distant possibilities;they're happening now.

What Residents Actually Want
A strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while expanding park space and community benefits. You saw this at the recent Council meeting: 65 letters were submitted, and multiple speakers made the case that we can pursue both open space and aviation. This isn't an either/or proposition.

Measure LC did not mandate converting the airport to a park. It mandated that no development happen without voter approval, with explicit exceptions for park and cultural spaces. The voters took local control of the land. They didn't vote to eliminate critical infrastructure.

My Ask
Take the time to pursue balanced solutions.

Don't rush toward an irreversible decision without fully examining the safety implications, financial viability, and economic opportunities. The community deserves a complete analysis, not just one predetermined option.

Listen to residents who are telling you there's a better path forward.

Thank you for your service to the community.

Sincerely,
Robert Jacobson
To
he
lp
pr
ot
ec
t
Email tracked with Mailsuite · Opt out 05/06/26, 10:33:39 AM To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 1 David Yakobson
From: Faustin Carter <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 9:14 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - I, a Sunset Park resident, care a lot about the future of the airport!

EXTERNAL
Dear Members of the City Council,
I'm a Sunset Park resident living just up 23rd Ave. from the airport, and I'm writing to ask you to keep Santa Monica Airport open in a capacity that allows for continued general aviation use.

The airport is a net positive in my daily life; I choose to live near it! As a private pilot from a family deeply rooted in aviation (my brother is an airline pilot, my father was an A&P mechanic and aerial photographer, and my grandfather flew in WWII) being close to a working general aviation field is a feature of this neighborhood. I grew up in Alaska on a private neighborhood air-field, and since I left AK I've been searching for a home near a general aviation hub and I finally found it here in Sunset Park, where I bought my home a few years ago. I want to invest my time and money into the airport and I want to share this part of my family's history with my own daughter while teaching her to fly in her own backyard. But I can't make that commitment, and neither can other pilots, mechanics, or small aviation businesses, without some assurance that the airport will still be here.

A park-only option sounds good (I love parks!), but also carries enormous costs (both fixed and in perpetuity) at a time when the city is facing serious budget pressure. I expect it would take many years and lots of money before residents like me see any real benefit. Indeed, I already live between two excellent parks (Virginia and Cloverfield) and I'm a stone's throw from many others that I use regularly; I'm not sure one more park is a unique selling point for a city that has such a wonderful park portfolio.

Meanwhile, the jobs, services, local pilot community, and small businesses tied to the airport disappear immediately and irreversibly with the loss of the airport.

Many Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still adding park space and community amenities, and that support is showing up in action. At the most recent Council meeting, I understand many letters were submitted and many people spoke in favor of keeping the airport, with folks pointing out that this isn't an either/or choice. We can have aviation, park space, and local businesses and also position Santa Monica as a hub for the clean-air-electric-aircraft movement already underway (100 octane no-lead av gas is already here!). This will bring innovation and long-term investment to the city in a way a big park cannot.

Please take the time to pursue a balanced solution rather than rushing toward closure. Listen to the residents who actually live next to the airport. Listen to me! Many of us are here because of it, not in spite of it. Please feel free to reply if you'd like any further comment.

As an aside, thank you all for your service to our community. I'd like to say to Dan Hall specifically, while I Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 2 have the opportunity, that I read all of your emails and they are a wonderful and invaluable source of current events and information! Please keep sending them! Sincerely,
Faustin Carter
2261 23rd St. Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 3 David Yakobson
From: Michael Landman <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 9:26 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Michael Hankin
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 4 David Yakobson
From: LESLIE WIZAN <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 12:35 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Leslie Wizan
Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 5 David Yakobson
From: LESLIE WIZAN <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 12:35 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Leslie Wizan
Montana Avenue
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 6 David Yakobson
From: LESLIE WIZAN <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 12:35 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Leslie Wizan
Montana Avenue
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 7 David Yakobson
From: Dave Guerra <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 7:17 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
David A Guerra
Mar Vista
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 1 David Yakobson
From: Leah Joven <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 1:36 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Leah Joven
Pico
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 2 David Yakobson
From: Some Guy Dino <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 1:20 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Dino Dinaso
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 3 David Yakobson
From: Joan Temple <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 1:19 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Joan Temple
los angeles mar vista
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 1 David Yakobson
From: Gloria Garvin <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 2:22 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a long term Santa Monica resident - my family moved into the Ocean Park area in 1903. I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the wonderful city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

My understanding is that strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use.

Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Gloria Garvin
Pico Neighborhood
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 1 David Yakobson
From: gabi ursu <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 3:32 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Ioana Bernacchi
Wilshire
Best wishes,
Ioana Bernacchi
[email protected]
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 2 David Yakobson
From: Judith Beaufait <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 3:21 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

I would add that in an emergency like the 1994 earthquake, our city may need Santa Monica airport for emergency supplies, patient transport etc.

I would also remind the City Council that without Santa Monica Airport's dedicated airspace, much bigger jets from LAX will be free to fly over all of Santa Monica at anytime.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Judith Beaufait
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 1 David Yakobson
From: Peter Keating <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 4:17 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Peter Keating
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 2 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 11:08 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember, I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits. Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit. Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city. I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents. Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport. Thank you for your service to our community. Sincerely, Jack Phillips North of Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 1 Mitchell Kois
From: Tianna Langham <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:08 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Tianna Langham
Ocean Ave and California
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 2 Mitchell Kois
From: Andy Hurwitz <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:07 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Andy Hurwitz
Ocean park
Please note my new email address:
[email protected]
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 3 Mitchell Kois
From: William Ahmanson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:07 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
William Ahmanson
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 4 Mitchell Kois
From: Tim Noonan <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:07 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Timothy Noonan
Palisades Beach Road
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 5 Mitchell Kois
From: Nastaran Khadavi <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Nastaran Khadavi
Nastaran
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 6 Mitchell Kois
From: William Ahmanson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
Aviation is an important part of our local history, and this airfield was there at the start. Closing this resource will erase this era.

The residents who started the efforts to close SaMo airport purchased homes made more affordable by the airport. While closing this airport might have a financial benefit to them, closing will have a negative impact on airport jobs and the middle class who might need the airport for their jobs.

This is a matter of equity.

I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 7 Sincerely,
William Ahmanson
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 8 Mitchell Kois
From: Gosia Probosz <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Gosia Probosz
Long Ɵme SM resident
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 9 Mitchell Kois
From: jennifer Gelb <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits. The airport is an assets . Our exisƟng parks can be repurposed.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Gelb
North of Montana ave
Jennie
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 10 Mitchell Kois
From: Hendifar, Andrew, M.D. <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Andrew Eugene Hendifar
North of montana
Andrew E. Hendifar
IMPORTANT WARNING: This message is intended for the use of the person or enƟty to which it is addressed and may contain informaƟon that is privileged and confidenƟal, the disclosure of which is governed by applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby noƟfied that any disseminaƟon, distribuƟon or copying of this informaƟon is strictly prohibited. Thank you for your cooperaƟon.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 11 Mitchell Kois
From: Mark Richards <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:05 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Mark Richards
Virginia Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 12 Mitchell Kois
From: marina valenzuela <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:04 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Marina Valenzuela
Ashland and 4th st
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 13 Mitchell Kois
From: Reza Mirfendereski <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:04 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Reza Mirfendereski
Sunset park p
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 14 Mitchell Kois
From: W Mendoza <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:04 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
W Mendoza
Wilshire, Montana
Wendy Mendoza
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 15 Mitchell Kois
From: Batsheva Chase <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:03 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Batsheva Chase
Sunset park
Batsheva Chase
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 16 Vice President of Sales Recruiting
Peak Performers Inc.

T
he
lin
ke
d
im
ag
e
ca
nn
ot
T
he
lin
ke
d
im
ag
e
ca
nn
ot
T
he
lin
ke
d
im
ag
e
ca
nn
ot
Email: [email protected]
Company website: ppirecruiting.com
Mobile: 310 971-1160
Finalist season 1 & 2 “Top Recruiter: The Competition”
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 17 Mitchell Kois
From: Chris Reese <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:02 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Chris Reese
Pico
Regards,
Chris Reese
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 18 Mitchell Kois
From: Scott Shelley <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 3:01 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
The Santa Monica Airport should remain open. There are so many reasons to maintain it ranging from the functional to the historic. All of these reasons have been voiced over the years, but to the list I would bring to the Council's attention the potential that removal of the Santa Monica airspace will likely result in more traffic from LAX overflying our community. This has been written about, but a lot of jet fuel is wasted by eastbound flights initially departing west over the ocean so that they may reach a clearance altitude to turn east and continue to their destination. It is the airspace above Santa Monica airport that forces them higher.

Further, the City will sorely regret a decision to close the airport when an emergency occurs. Open space is irreplaceable. Airport open space and the airspace system more so. Whether staging for support equipment, food and supply delivery, or even staging for drone taxi's (Read: the future.) the current area is not duplicatable.

I strongly believe that closing the airport is a short-sighted idea driven by minority interests. As plans for re-purposing the airport site have been revealed , the majority of my neighbors favor keeping the airport open.

Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,l
Scott Shelley
415.531.7627
Ocean Park resident
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 19 Mitchell Kois
From: M G Starr <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:59 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
M Gerhard Starr
Ocean Park since ‘94
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 20 Mitchell Kois
From: Sasa Blackoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:54 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Sasa Blackoff
Ocean park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 21 Mitchell Kois
From: Ted Romano <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:52 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Ted Romano
Sunset Beach
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 22 Mitchell Kois
From: Lania Bettin <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:50 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember, I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits. The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit. Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region. I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities. Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport. Thank you for your service to our community. Sincerely, Lania Bettin Oceanpark Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 23 Mitchell Kois
From: Matthew Kitchen <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:50 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
MaƩhew Kitchen
Santa monica
Thank you
MaƩhew Kitchen.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 24 Mitchell Kois
From: Daniel Warner <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:49 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Daniel Warner
Pico
Cell 3107292111 https://calendly.com/danwarner333/30min Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 25 Mitchell Kois
From: Zachary <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:48 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Zachary Hoevet
Airport Commission Candidate
Sunset Park Resident
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 26 Mitchell Kois
From: Dr. Jeffrey Ptak <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:48 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey Ptak
Jeffrey Ptak DC, DSS, MA, MSS
3122 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 102
Santa Monica, CA 90404
hƩps://urldefense.com/v3/__hƩp://www.ptakfamilychiropracƟc.com__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!vltScGGQBIhai_CyR4fHW o3PTFZUj7qDBchWjtl5NkXwhIryV71h8ITji_pKmtWGVEPYqA3Qj5aFo_5ycQQFzTT7RynQmraai7I$ 310-473-7991
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 27 Mitchell Kois
From: stedjarati <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:41 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

I have 5 aircraŌ and a helicopter. 4 of them are based in Santa Monica and I use them extensively for business and for pleasure. Without such access I will have a significant impairment of my business.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Shane TedjaraƟ
Georgina and Ocean
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 28 Mitchell Kois
From: Meyera Robbins <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:39 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Meyera Robbins
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 29 Mitchell Kois
From: Amani Abou-Zamzam MBA <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:38 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Amani Abou-Zamzam MBA
Northeast
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 30 Mitchell Kois
From: Rhona Wacht <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:35 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Rhona Wacht
north of Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 31 Mitchell Kois
From: Kara Boccella <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:30 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Kara Boccella
Kara Boccella
917-539-2411
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 32 Mitchell Kois
From: Cathy <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:28 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Catherine A Shepard
Sent from Cathy’s iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 33 Mitchell Kois
From: Shelley Fisher <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:28 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Shelvis
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 34 Mitchell Kois
From: Mark Fisher <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:22 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Mark Fisher
Downtown
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 35 Mitchell Kois
From: Derek Loughran <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:21 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

President Eisenhower built regional airports to make sure, that in an emergency, vital supplies could reach small cities like Santa Monica.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Derek Loughran
Ocean Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 36 Mitchell Kois
From: Dolores Grijalva <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:21 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Dolores
Pico
Life is good!
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 37 Mitchell Kois
From: blair tarr <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:16 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Blair Tarr
Ocean Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 38 Mitchell Kois
From: Lauren Birnstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:08 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember, I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits. Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit. Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city. I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents. Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport. Thank you for your service to our community. Sincerely, Lauren Weis North of Wilshire and South of Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 39 Mitchell Kois
From: Thury Byrkett <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:07 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Thury ByrkeƩ
Ocean Park
Sent lovingly from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 40 Mitchell Kois
From: Russel Steingold <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Russel Steingold
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 41 Mitchell Kois
From: Rob Morrison <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Robert Morrison
Ocean Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 42 Mitchell Kois
From: Dita Cole <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:04 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Dita Cole
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 43 Mitchell Kois
From: Sheila Johns <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:03 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

We don’t need anymore parks or apartment complexes! You people have sold us out! I have owned a house here for 30 years and just sickened to what has become of our precious city. Please don not remove the airport we need it and don’t need to waste any mor of our hard earned money!
Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Sheila Johns
Ocean park
Kindest regards,
Sheila Johns
310-365-6744
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 44 Mitchell Kois
From: Elaine Becker <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 2:03 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Elaine Becker
Sunset park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 45 Mitchell Kois
From: Jane Roberts <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:57 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jane Roberts
North of Montana
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 46 Mitchell Kois
From: Joyce Urode <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:57 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Joyce Urode
santa monica
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 47 Mitchell Kois
From: Colette O'Connell <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:55 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Colette OConnell
Wilshire
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 48 Mitchell Kois
From: Diana Duncan <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:50 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Cc: Diana Duncan
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Diana Duncan
Montana
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 49 Mitchell Kois
From: CHRISTOPHER SPEIRS <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:46 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Christopher M. Speirs
Redondo Beach
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 50 Mitchell Kois
From: Lino Rossi <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:45 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Lino Rossi
Sunset Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 51 Mitchell Kois
From: David DeCrane <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:42 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
David DeCrane
SMC area
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 52 Mitchell Kois
From: Darien Morea <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:42 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. !!! Including me!
We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Darien Morea
Ocean Park SE
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 53 Mitchell Kois
From: AJ <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:42 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
AJ Ullman
NW Santa Monica
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 54 Mitchell Kois
From: trish mccall <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:42 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Patricia McCall
Kansas Avenue
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 55 Mitchell Kois
From: Steffan Falesitch <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:40 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Steffan Falesitch
Northeast
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 56 Mitchell Kois
From: Beth Greulich <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:35 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Beth Greulich
NOMA
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 57 Mitchell Kois
From: Margie <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:33 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Margaret Ashkar
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 58 Mitchell Kois
From: Gil Spielberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:30 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Gil Spielberg
Ocean park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 59 Mitchell Kois
From: Nicholas Erasmus <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:29 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Nicholas Erasmus
Ocean Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 60 Mitchell Kois
From: Paul Vitagliano <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:28 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Paul Vitagliano
Wilshire - Montana
Sincerely,
Paul Vitagliano
[email protected]
310 562-5128
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 61 Mitchell Kois
From: Richard <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:26 PM
To: Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: Airport
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
I am 100% behind keeping the airport open and no park.

The city Council has done a horrible job managing funds and an even a worse job with the homeless.

That park would be filled up with homeless alcoholic/drug addicts from around the city while costing us TAXPAYERS millions in upkeep.

You’re not doing a very good job. One good thing you could do is keep the airport open.

The traffic in that area is already a nightmare, and don’t even think about one of your“affordable housing” scams on that property.

Richard Warner
SM beach
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 62 Mitchell Kois
From: Jim Cross <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:22 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
James Cross
Main Street and Marine Street
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 63 Mitchell Kois
From: Kim Boston <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:18 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
David Boston
Sent from my iPad
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 64 Mitchell Kois
From: Mark Varo <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:18 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Mark Varo
NOMA
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 65 Mitchell Kois
From: Norm Billings <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:14 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Norman Billings
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 66 Mitchell Kois
From: Cameka Duncan <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:14 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Cimmi Duncan
Sunset park
Cimmi Duncan
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 67 Beauty Stylist
310-754-9390
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 68 Mitchell Kois
From: Brigette Bonner <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:13 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
BrigeƩe Bonner
Sunset Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 69 Mitchell Kois
From: Jesus <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:11 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jesus Fajardo
632 pico blvd #6
Santa Monica Ca 90405
Jesus Fajardo
(310) 625-2314
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 70 Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 71 Mitchell Kois
From: Jon Winthrop <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:11 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jon R. Winthrop
+1(818) 807-8881
Senior Advisor
Kerlin Capital Group LLC
14th Street, Santa Monica
This is a confidenƟal and privileged communicaƟon. If you have received this communicaƟon in error, please delete this message and any aƩachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 72 Mitchell Kois
From: Jill Whitesides <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:10 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jill Whitesides
11th Street @ Santa Monica Blvd
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 73 Mitchell Kois
From: Janice Knight <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:10 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Janice Knight
Sunset park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 74 Mitchell Kois
From: Jeanine Rachel Ordonez <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:10 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jeanine Rachel Ordonez
Sunset Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 75 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:08 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Salma Damji
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 76 Mitchell Kois
From: Sierra Vidal <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:08 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Sierra Vidal
Collegiate streets
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 77 Mitchell Kois
From: arlena barnes <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:07 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember, I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits. The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries.

We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit. Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region. I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities. Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport. Thank you for your service to our community. Sincerely, Arlena Lee Barnes Colorado Center & Olympic Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 78 Mitchell Kois
From: Mia Maestro <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Mia Maestro
Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 79 Mitchell Kois
From: Sandra Harte <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Sandra Harte
North of Montana
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 80 Mitchell Kois
From: Richard Shore <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:06 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Richard Shore
College streets
Typos courtesy of my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 81 Mitchell Kois
From: Edwin Coronado <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:05 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
- Edwin Coronado
Private Pilot
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 82 Mitchell Kois
From: Pat Wen <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:02 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Pat Wen
Mid City
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 83 Mitchell Kois
From: Katrina Carlson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 1:01 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Katrina Carlson
Montana ave
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 84 Mitchell Kois
From: Aimee Hunter <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:58 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Aimee Hunter
Mid-city
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 85 Mitchell Kois
From: Patricia L Jennings <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:50 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jennings Patricia
Wilshire & 14th
P.L. Jennings, MA, MFT
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 86 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Email is not a protected format for the purpose of confidentiality; therefore, do not send information that is intended to be confidential. This communication and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, constitute an electronic communication within the scope of the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510. This communication may contain non-public, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or have received this communication in error, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply email, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system, including attachments, without reading them or saving them to disk. The unlawful interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly prohibited under 18 USCA 2511 and other applicable laws. Thank you.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 87 Mitchell Kois
From: Bridget Johnson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:48 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Cloverfield has important historic meaning to the City of Santa Monica. General aviation is dying in this country, and this is a huge loss. Although my family moved to Santa Monica in the 1950s, I spent my youth in Globe Arizona where my Dad moved after serving as a medic in WWII. He was the only doctor in the region, and served the Navajo and Apache reservations as well as the local ranchers and miner. He did this as a general aviation pilot so he could get to remote regions using his bush plane. I was able to learn to fly with him.

This instilled in me a life-long love of general aviation, and I have tried to share and instill that in our children and the young people I have met along the way.

Cloverfield is also a relief airport for LAX. If disaster strikes, this will be critical. Until the Palisades Fires, the prospect of disaster happening in our community seemed very remote. Not so now.

If Cloverfield is shut down, the FAA restrictions on building heights in the surrounding area will no longer hold, which can lead to development of high rises and densities that the will be impactful to the residents in the surrounding area.

I believe that real issue for local residents was the use of the airport for small jet traffic as many affluent people grew increasingly wealthy and started using jets to fly in and out of our airport. I agree that is became a nightmare for people living nearby. But with the changes to the runway, that is no longer possible.

I would also like to point out that the real estate values of the homes surrounding the airport has historically been much lower for comparable properties in the City. The folks who live close to and around the airport will experience a windfall in terms of home values if the airport closes. So the motivations of the fierce push to close the airport coming from local residents is not pure.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 88 Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Doug Wheeler
North of Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 89 Mitchell Kois
From: Sydney Bennion <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:45 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits. The airport provides vital services to all of Santa Monica and the surrounding communities.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Sydney Bennion
North of Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 90 Mitchell Kois
From: lee wolfort <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:44 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Ramona Lee wolfort
Montana Ave
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 91 Mitchell Kois
From: Justin Kelch <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:42 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
JusƟn Kelch
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 92 Mitchell Kois
From: Sharon La-von Williams <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:42 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Sharon Williams
Pico-Ocean Front Walk
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 93 Mitchell Kois
From: Annie Azzariti <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:42 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Annie Azzariti
Santa Monica
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 94 Mitchell Kois
From: Janet Hoffman <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:41 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Janet L Hoffman
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 95 Mitchell Kois
From: Björn Karlsson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:41 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Björn Karlsson
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 96 Mitchell Kois
From: Lindsay Kast <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:38 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Lindsay Kast
ManhaƩan Beach
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 97 Mitchell Kois
From: Yafa Dekel <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:37 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Yafa Dekel
North of Wiltshire
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 98 Mitchell Kois
From: Dustin Newman <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:36 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. Furthermore I am concerned about the proliferaƟon of high rise buildings by developers that will ruin the skyline and charm of Santa Monica. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
DusƟn Newman
Santa Monica
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 99 Mitchell Kois
From: Lynne Weiske <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:35 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
lynne weiske
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 100
Mitchell Kois
From: Lauren de la Fuente <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:34 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Council Mailbox; Oliver Chi; Planning Commission Comments; [email protected]; Airport Mailbox
Subject: Protect Santa Monica Airport Land for the Community, Not Developers Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Members of the Santa Monica City Council,
I am writing as a concerned resident to urge the City to protect the future of the Santa Monica Airport land by either preserving it as an airport or transforming it into the Great Park the community was promised. What must not happen is turning this land over to developers for more housing and mixed-use projects.

At some point, the City has to acknowledge reality. “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” Santa Monica is already struggling with excessive vacancies in both retail and residential properties. Apartments are sitting empty. Retail storefronts remain vacant across the city. Rents are coming down because supply is already outpacing demand.

And yet, despite these clear warning signs resulting in the need for a Realignment Plan, the City continues to pursue policies that assume more development is the answer rather than fixing what is already broken.

If prior planning efforts had genuinely reflected what the community wanted, there would be no need for a “realignment” program today. Residents have repeatedly voiced concerns about overdevelopment, loss of character, congestion, and the erosion of what once made Santa Monica livable, unique and thriving.

Adding more development on the airport land also does not solve the deeper issues affecting Santa Monica today.

Residents are concerned about public safety, homelessness, quality of life, and the visible decline of once-thriving commercial corridors. More apartments and mixed-use development will not address those concerns. Expanding development without first restoring public trust, safety, and economic vitality risks accelerating the very problems the City is now trying to correct through its Realignment efforts.

The airport land is one of the last major opportunities to create something meaningful and lasting for the people who already live here. A true Great Park would preserve open space, improve quality of life, support families, and serve future generations. Preserving the airport as an airport would also maintain an important civic and transportation asset.

Either option keeps this land in service of the public.

But once housing developers gain control of this land, Santa Monica will effectively be in their hands permanently. There will be no going back. More apartments and commercial projects will not revive the city. They will deepen the very problems residents have been raising for years.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 101
Santa Monica does not need more overdevelopment disguised as revitalization. It needs leadership willing to recognize when a strategy is failing and courageous enough to change course.

Please protect this land for the community, not for developers.

Sincerely,
Lauren de la Fuente
Santa Monica Resident and Voter for More Than 26 Years
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 102
Mitchell Kois
From: Rita Sakamoto <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:33 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
As a dedicated resident of Santa Monica, living in close proximity to our airport, I am writing to passionately advocate for a vision that both preserves the invaluable Santa Monica Airport and simultaneously expands our community's green spaces and public amenities. My daily life is intrinsically linked to this vibrant area, and I firmly believe that we can, and must, achieve a solution that embraces both aviation and park development, rather than forcing an unnecessary choice between them.

The airport is far more than just a landing strip; it is a vital artery for our local economy, sustaining a diverse array of businesses, providing numerous jobs, and offering essential services that benefit our entire neighborhood. The potential closure of this long-standing institution represents an irreversible decision with profound and damaging ramifications for local commerce, individual livelihoods, and the unique character of our community. We simply cannot afford to disregard the significant economic contributions and the ecosystem of activity the airport fosters directly outside our homes.

Furthermore, the proposition of converting the entire site into a park-only development presents a formidable financial burden for Santa Monica. At a time when our city is grappling with considerable budgetary constraints, committing to a project estimated to cost hundreds of millions of dollars, with benefits that would likely be delayed for years if not decades for residents closest to the site, is fiscally irresponsible. There are more prudent and immediate ways to enhance public spaces without incurring such monumental and potentially crippling expenses.

It is imperative to acknowledge the clear voice of the community on this matter. A substantial majority of Santa Monica voters have consistently expressed their desire to retain the airport while concurrently developing additional parkland. This sentiment is not merely anecdotal; it was powerfully demonstrated at the most recent City Council meeting, where dozens of letters and numerous heartfelt testimonies from residents — including many from neighborhoods directly impacted – underscored the feasibility of a balanced approach. These voices unequivocally articulated that Santa Monica does not face an either/or dilemma; a harmonious integration of aviation and recreation is entirely achievable.

Indeed, there exists a compelling path forward that positions Santa Monica at the forefront of the burgeoning clean air mobility revolution. By embracing this innovative future, we can transform the airport into a hub for sustainable aviation technologies, attracting new investment, fostering Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 103
groundbreaking research, and creating high-quality jobs that will benefit generations to come. This approach not only preserves a crucial community asset but also aligns our city with global advancements, promising long-term prosperity and environmental leadership.

I implore the City Council to resist the temptation of a hasty and potentially regrettable decision. Instead, I urge you to dedicate the time and resources necessary to meticulously explore and champion balanced solutions that both safeguard this invaluable community resource and judiciously expand public space and amenities for all residents, particularly those of us who live right here in the vicinity.

Please prioritize listening to the thoughtful input of your constituents and steer clear of any action that would irrevocably close the airport without fully exploring every viable alternative.

Thank you for your dedicated service to our community and for considering this critical perspective.

Sincerely,
Rita Sakamoto
North Westdale 90064
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 104
Mitchell Kois
From: Steffen Kuhlmann <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:30 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Steffen Kuhlmann
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 105
Mitchell Kois
From: ANISSA PADILLA <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:29 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Anissa Padilla
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 106
Mitchell Kois
From: Debra Ack <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:27 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Debra Ack
Wilshire Montana
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 107
Mitchell Kois
From: Susan Hopper <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:26 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Susan Hopper
Hancock Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 108
Mitchell Kois
From: Pete Koch <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:18 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Peter Koch
Downtown
Pete Koch
Actor
NFL Alumnus
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 109
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 110
Mitchell Kois
From: Trace Parker <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:16 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Trace Parker
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 111
Mitchell Kois
From: j. manuel esparza <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:13 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
J Manuel Esparza
Pico
Sent from my iPad
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 112
Mitchell Kois
From: Nichola Dunne <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:11 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
nichola dunne
san vicente
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 113
Mitchell Kois
From: Shari Phillips <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:08 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Also, I understand if you close the SM airport the area around it will be leŌ open for flights out of LAX to fly over causing more noise for our city.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Shari Phillips
Noma
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 114
Mitchell Kois
From: Leslie Kaplan <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:04 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Les Kaplan
Ocean Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 115
Mitchell Kois
From: Ysolda Freedman <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:02 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Ysolda Rodriguez
Sunset Park / right next to Clover park
Ysolda
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 116
Mitchell Kois
From: Dawn Cohen <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 12:01 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Dawn bishop
Wilmont
Regards,
Dawn
Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any errors.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 117
Mitchell Kois
From: Roman, Lynda <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:58 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. We have already lost out big by the decision not to host Olympic events .

A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit. The park effecƟvely eat wouid be beƩer spent increasing security at our pre-exisƟng parks .

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Lynda Duval
Montana
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 118
Mitchell Kois
From: JOHN KOSCIUK <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:55 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Peter James; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
John Kosciuk
Ocean Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 119
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:54 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: dangerous parking
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
I hope this note gets to someone on the council who cares. The Broadway parking situation is dangerous not only to people who park there but cars that go by. Person in the car has to open their door and get out into oncoming cars coming...then they have to get their toddler and stroller out plus a disabled person and their wheelchair out...they have to then get across the unmarked barrier to get them to the safe sidewalk...there is little or no people on bikes there so why is it needed. i saw a women almost get killed while trying to get out of her car when she had to open her door to get out. People in the nearby shops on 4th say they rarely if ever see a bike on that lane. I only hope that this stupid and dangerous plan can be changed or someone will be hurt or killed...who is the person that came up with this idea and who voted for it .I never saw this on the agenda for the public to speak, I could have missed it but the many many people on our Nextdoor did not know about this either. I ask that this whole mess be fixed so that the drivers have safe access out of their cars and onto the sidewalk....Bonnie Burke a resident for over 60 years and now disabled and need to get out of my car. I would ask one of the people on the council to go and try this out for themselves...before something and the city is sued...what a waste of money and now Santa Monica complains about no money...these barrier should also be painted or somehow let people know they are there....if you look you will see that people have gone over these barriers, another lawsuit awaits. Thank you Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 120
Mitchell Kois
From: Levon Babikian <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:54 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Levon Babikian
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 121
Mitchell Kois
From: HOWARD ALPERT <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:51 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Howard J Alpert
Ocean Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 122
Mitchell Kois
From: Deborah Ricketts <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:50 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: The Future of the Airport
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Deborah Ricketts
Northeast Neighbors
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 123
Mitchell Kois
From: Gail Denney <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:50 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
M Gail Denney
Sent from
Gail Denney
Professional Retail Sales Consultant
[email protected]
310 621 7486
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 124
Mitchell Kois
From: Robyn Nissim <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:49 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

We have overbuilt the city, it is beyond crowded, it’s sƟll not affordable, and our biggest issue is that the streets are overtaken with homelessness and peƩy crime from drug users. Parks, library, and public transportaƟon… Yes, even our beauƟful beach is all at risk.

It is not safe here. We do not need you to build anything else. We need you to focus on cleaning up our streets and bringing local businesses back.

The promenade is over 50% empty. Same thing with Park Place mall and Main Street. It’s patheƟc and you should be genuinely ashamed of the state of this once beauƟful and thriving city. It looks like a scene from the walking dead.

Vacated businesses, trash, and homeless drugged out zombies parading through the city. Shame on you.

Santa Monica is not thriving because it’s not safe. It is overcrowded. It has been over developed in all of the wrong sectors and elected officials have completely lost the plot by profiƟng off of the new development builds that genuinely benefit no one.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the flow of traffic, local shops, stores, a public ameniƟes, and businesses including the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 125
Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Stop pushing to over build our city. Leave it alone and focus on making it great by cleaning up the streets, removing the unhoused, taking back public spaces for the actual contribuƟng members of society — and focus on bringing back a thriving economy.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Robyn Nissim
Sunset park
Please excuse typos, this message was sent from my iPhone 깺깻깼깽깾깹깿 Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 126
Mitchell Kois
From: Chezvic <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:48 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Victoria Jensen
Ocean Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 127
Mitchell Kois
From: ghkfan <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:47 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact safety, jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit. Tongva Park fountains sƟll haven’t been repaired…I’m sure due to finances.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport just the saƟsfy greedy developers who want scant affordable housing with more expensive units siƫng empty.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Renee Ainsworth
Ocean Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 128
Mitchell Kois
From: Lisa Beachy <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:40 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Lisa Beachy
Midcity
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 129
Mitchell Kois
From: Flor Santos <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:40 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Flor Salazar
Ocean park and 6
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 130
Mitchell Kois
From: Diana Peters <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:38 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Diana peters
Wilshire
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 131
Mitchell Kois
From: Ron Nuckles <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:32 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I am a pilot and I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities. This airport provides many benefits, economic and otherwise, to the communities it serves and should not be closed.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Ron Nuckles
Cell 951-201-9352
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 132
This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain p roprietary, confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended re cipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email, delete this communication and destroy all copies.

Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 133
Mitchell Kois
From: Kate Flather <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:31 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

I live in Ocean Park directly under the flight path. This has NEVER been an issue.

I took the local CERT training and many of the first responders teaching it talked about what a VITAL RESOURCE THE AIRPORT WOULD BE IN A LARGE SCALE EMERGENCY.

Lastly, unƟl our truly disgraceful local homeless situaƟon has been adequately , and our EXISTING OPEN SPACES e.g.

Tongva Park are actually safe and funcƟonal to the taxpaying public, I don’t think we need more.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Kate Flather
Ocean Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 134
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 135
Mitchell Kois
From: Lorraine Rodriguez <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:31 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Lorraine Rodriguez
Sent from Lorraine's IPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 136
Mitchell Kois
From: Maurice Bueno <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:30 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Mauricio Bueno MD
North of Montana
Mauricio Bueno M.D.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 137
Family Care Specialist Medical Group C.F.O.

Faculty and Inpatient Director
AH White Memorial Medical Center
Family Medicine Residency Program
Clinical Assistant Professor
Keck School of Medicine of USC/Loma Linda School of Medicine [email protected]
W(323)260-5789

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 138
Mitchell Kois
From: Jeff Payne <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:29 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jeff Payne
Jeff Payne
www.elevensound.com
o) 310.526.2911
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 139
c) 310.699.6240
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 140
Mitchell Kois
From: Beau Grabner <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:28 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

The airport is crucial for emergency services as well as seen during the fires last year.

As a father I hope other families will be able to enjoy the unique opportunity of having a park and an airport that kids and adults enjoy. It really is a part of our neighborhood and our lives.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Beau Grabner
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 141
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 142
Mitchell Kois
From: KFark <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:24 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
KrisƟna Farkas
Westchester
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 143
Mitchell Kois
From: Alejandra Santini <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:24 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Alejandra SanƟni
Ocean Park Neighborhood resident
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 144
Mitchell Kois
From: Mina Solomon <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:24 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
mina solomon
Ocean Ave
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 145
Mitchell Kois
From: Francois M Schramek <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:18 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Francois M Schramek
Ocean Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 146
Mitchell Kois
From: John Buckingham <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:18 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
For once you need to exercise some COMMON SENSE.

I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
John Buckingham
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 147
Mitchell Kois
From: michelene Mundo <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:16 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Michelene Mundo
Montaña
Michelene Mundo
Assistant Director
310.924.7740
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 148
The contents of this email message and any aƩachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidenƟal and/or privileged informaƟon and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any aƩachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby noƟfied that any use, disseminaƟon, copying, or storage of this message or its aƩachments is strictly prohibited.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 149
Mitchell Kois
From: Kent Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:13 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
kent
Calif incline
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 150
Mitchell Kois
From: Dion Jackson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:12 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Dion Jackson
North of Montana
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 151
Mitchell Kois
From: Dana T <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:11 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
DANA M Tischler
Wilshire
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 152
Mitchell Kois
From: Murray Kalis <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:10 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Murray Kalis
Ocean Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 153
Mitchell Kois
From: John's Yahoo <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:09 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
john keefer
mid city
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 154
Mitchell Kois
From: Peter Flood <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:07 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Peter Flood
Montana neighborhood
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 155
Mitchell Kois
From: Barbara Feuer <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:07 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Feuer Barbara
North of Wilshire
Sent from my trusty iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 156
Mitchell Kois
From: Stu Smiley <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:07 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Stuart Smiley
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 157
Mitchell Kois
From: Jean Grossman <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:06 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jean Grossman
3 rd and Pico
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 158
Mitchell Kois
From: Robert Katz <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:05 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Robert Katz
Sunset park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 159
Mitchell Kois
From: Andrew Williams <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:04 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the acƟvity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into acƟon. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviaƟon. There is a clear path to do both, while posiƟoning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovaƟon, investment, and long-term benefits to the enƟre community.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Andrew Williams
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 160
Mitchell Kois
From: charlie matthau <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:03 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Chsrles
Sp
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 161
Mitchell Kois
From: Susanne Jacobson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:02 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Susanne Jacobson
Noma
Sent from my mobile device
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 162
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:01 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Robin Zurn
South Beach
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 163
Mitchell Kois
From: GISSELLE <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 11:01 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Gisselle Acosta
South Bay
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 164
Mitchell Kois
From: ROSEMARY GUTHRIE <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:58 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I was a 10-year resident of Santa Monica and am a 30-year resident of Mar Vista, just a couple of blocks south of the airport.

I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,

ROSEMARY GUTHRIE
Mar Vista
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 165
Mitchell Kois
From: Evelyn Schweers <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:50 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident who lives near the airport, and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

As someone whose daily life is directly shaped by the airport and the surrounding area, I value the activity, jobs, and services it brings to our neighborhood. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact the local businesses and livelihoods right outside our doors. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents like me, the ones closest to the site, see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are also seeing that support turn into action. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and several individuals spoke in support of the airport, including residents who emphasized that Santa Monica does not have to choose between park space and aviation. There is a clear path to do both, while positioning the city as a hub for the clean air mobility movement already underway, bringing innovation, investment, and long-term benefits to the entire community.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for those of us who live nearby.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Evelyn Schweers
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 166
Mitchell Kois
From: John Circenis <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 9:07 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
John Robert Circenis
The Northeast Neighborhood AssociaƟon
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 167
Mitchell Kois
From: Robin H. <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:30 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Robin R Herman
Montana Avenue
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 168
Mitchell Kois
From: David Glück <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:28 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
David Gluck
12th & Pico
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 169
Mitchell Kois
From: Gabe <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:21 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implications beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connectivity. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that sentiment translate into action, with 65 letters submitted and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeting. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviation, while also positioning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviation technologies, creating benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue balanced solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

All My Best,
Gabe Breakstone
E-Mail: [email protected]
Cell: (480)737-0875
LinkedIn: Gabriel Breakstone
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 170
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by replying to this email and then delete this message and any attachments from all of your systems that may have received the message. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited, and may be illegal under the laws enforced by the State of Arizona and the federal government of the United States.

Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 171
Mitchell Kois
From: Amy Spiegel <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:19 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

I’ll add that the argument for emergency operaƟons (like happened during the fires) is another reason to keep the airport open.

Sincerely,
Amy Spiegel
Sunset Park
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 172
Mitchell Kois
From: Mara Thompson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:18 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember, I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

We need the airport for emergency services.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on.

A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit. Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city. I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents. Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community. Sincerely, Mara Thompson Ocean Park Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 173
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:18 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
William BurneƩ
Ocean park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 174
Mitchell Kois
From: Barbara Wallace <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:16 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

The Santa Monica Airport is a historic and valuable resource, and decisions about its future have implicaƟons beyond city boundaries. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and regional connecƟvity. A parkonly opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before residents see any benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. We are beginning to see that senƟment translate into acƟon, with 65 leƩers submiƩed and individuals speaking in support at the most recent City Council meeƟng. Those speakers made clear that Santa Monica can pursue both open space and aviaƟon, while also posiƟoning itself as a hub for clean air mobility and emerging aviaƟon technologies, creaƟng benefits that extend across the city and the broader region.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue balanced soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Barbara Wallace
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 175
Mitchell Kois
From: Garrett Pence <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:13 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am writing because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it matters to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only option creates enormous costs for the City at a time when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while still having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeting, 65 letters were submitted and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and continued aviation use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporting innovation that benefits the entire city.

I hope the City will take the time to pursue solutions that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and amenities for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Garrett Pence
Wilmont
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 176
Mitchell Kois
From: MELISSA FEINBERG <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:09 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Holly Silvers
Subject: SM AIPORT CLOSURE
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Good morning,
First I want to say thank you to the city council for all of your help this term.

California has had many challenges in these last few years and I know that it has to be difficult to deal with everything all at once.

Thank you for being willing to represent us thru it all.

I’m wriƟng to let you know that as a resident that lives a stones throw from Clover Park how much I’ve enjoyed the airport for the last 35 + years of my residency here in SM.

Please please please do not close the airport.

It’s iconic.

It generates revenue and we have the best emergency responses right here at our fingerƟps.

A simple transformaƟon would be fine.

Complete closure would be a huge buzzkill.

Thank you in advance for any help that you can offer in regard to this request.

All the best,
Melissa
Sent from my iPhone
Melissa Feinberg

PROPERTY MASTER
[email protected]
(818) 612-1654
Item 1
May 12, 2026
Item 1
May 12, 2026

1.A.a
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7725 : Written Comments) 177
Mitchell Kois
From: Dona Richwine <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 10:09 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Susan Cline; Peter James; [email protected]; Oliver Chi Subject: RE: Agenda Item 1 - Please Listen to Residents on the Future of the Airport Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmember,
I am a Santa Monica resident and I am wriƟng because I strongly support keeping the Santa Monica Airport open while exploring ways to expand park space and community benefits.

Even though I do not live right next to the airport, it maƩers to me as part of what makes Santa Monica the city it is. We do not want an irreversible decision that can impact jobs, businesses, and city revenues that fund the services all of us rely on. A park-only opƟon creates enormous costs for the City at a Ɵme when Santa Monica is already facing serious budget challenges, and would likely take many years and hundreds of millions of dollars before any resident sees a benefit.

Most importantly, a strong majority of Santa Monica voters support keeping the airport while sƟll having park space and businesses. That support is becoming more visible. At the most recent City Council meeƟng, 65 leƩers were submiƩed and residents came forward to speak, reinforcing that many in the community believe we can have both meaningful open space and conƟnued aviaƟon use. Speakers highlighted the opportunity for Santa Monica to serve as a leader in clean air mobility, supporƟng innovaƟon that benefits the enƟre city.

I hope the City will take the Ɵme to pursue soluƟons that preserve this important community resource while adding new public space and ameniƟes for all Santa Monica residents.

Please listen to residents and avoid rushing toward closing the airport.

← All documents from this meeting