Santa Monica City Council
July 14, 2026

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
2174 4267026007 8,131 0.19 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R2 291 8,131 5 80 15 2.5 20,328 36%
2175 4267026008 8,133 0.19 1/2 mile0
0 10N Residential R2 291 8,133 5 80 15 2.5 20,331 36%
2176 4267026013 8,137 0.19 1/2 mile0
01 0
N Residential R2 291 8,137 5 80 15 2.5 20,342 36%
2177 4267026015 8,123 0.19 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 8,123
5 80 15 2.5 20,306 36%
2178 4267026017 8,137 0.19 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 8,137
5 80 15 2.5 20,343 36%
2179 4267026018 8,129 0.19 1/2 mile
0100N Residential R2 29
1 8,129
5 80 15 2.5 20,322 36%
2180 4267026019 7,100 0.16 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 7,100 5 80 13 2.5 17,751 36%
2181 4267026020 7,102 0.16 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 7,102 5 80 13 2.5 17,756 36%
2182 4267026021 6,975 0.16 1/2 mile
001
0N Residential R2 291 6,975 5 80 13 2.5 17,438 36%
2183 4267026022 6,948 0.16 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 6,948
5 80 13 2.5 17,370 36%
2184 4267026023 3,482 0.08 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 3,482 2 806 2.5 8,706 36%
2185 4267026024 3,484 0.08 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 3,484 2 806 2.5 8,710 36% 2186 4267026025 10,592 0.24 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 10,592 7 80 19 2.5 26,480 36%
2187 4267026026 3,613 0.08 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 3,613
2 807 2.5 9,032 36%
2188 4267026036 14,626 0.34 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 29
1 14,626 10 80 27 2.5 36,565 36%
2189 4267026048 8,121 0.19 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 8,121 5 80 15 2.5 20,303 36% 2190 4267026055 8,106 0.19 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 8,106 5 80 15 2.5 20,265 36%
2191 4267026061 8,117 0.19 1/2 mile
000
0N Residential R2 29
1 8,117 5 80 15 2.5 20,292 36%
2192 4267026068 8,131 0.19 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 8,131 5 80 15 2.5 20,329 36%
2193 4267026075 8,119 0.19 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 8,119 5 80 15 2.5 20,297 36% 2194 4267026082 8,117 0.19 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 8,117 5 80 15 2.5 20,291 36%
2198 4267027010 8,136 0.19 1/2 mile
001
0N Residential R2 29
1 8,136 5 80 15 2.5 20,341 36%
2200 4267027014 8,107 0.19 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R2 29
1 8,107 5 80 15 2.5 20,268 36%
2202 4267027016 8,134 0.19 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 8,134 5 80 15 2.5 20,336 36%
2203 4267027018 8,118 0.19 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 8,118 5 80 15 2.5 20,294 36%
2204 4267027020 14,202 0.33 1/2 mile
0010
N Residential R2 291 14,202 9 80 26 2.5 35,505 36%
2205 4267027021 6,975 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 6,975 5 80 13 2.5 17,438 36%
2206 4267027022 6,976 0.16 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 6,976 5 80 13 2.5 17,439 36%
2207 4267027026 16,227 0.37 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 16,227 11 80 30 2.5 40,567 36% 2208 4267027029 21,153 0.49 1/2 mile
0000
N Residential R2 291 21,153 14 80 39 2.5 52,882 36%
2209 4267027048 8,137 0.19 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 8,137 5 80 15 2.5 20,341 36%
2213 4267027076 16,001 0.37 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 16,001 11 80 29 2.5 40,003 36%
2236 4268001021 196,022 4.50 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial BTV4 784,090 1,120 100 4503 588,067 249% 2237 4268001025 44,367 1.02 1/4 mile
0000
N Commercial BTV4 177,468 254 100 1023 133,101 249%
2238 4268001026 47,449 1.09 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial BTV
4 189,796 271 100 1093 142,347 249%
2239 4268001032 87,068 2.00 1/4 mile0000N Commercial BTV 4 348,271 498 100 2003 261,203 249%
2240 4268001033 37,528 0.86 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial BTV4 150,112 214 100 863 112,584 249%
2241 4268001034 46,748 1.07 1/4 mile
0000
N Commercial BTV4 186,992 267 100 1073 140,244 249%
2242 4268001038 38,548 0.88 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial BTV
4 154,194 220 100 883 115,645 249%
2243 4268001039 112,166 2.57 1/4 mile0000N Commercial BTV 4 448,664 641 100 2573 336,498 249%
2244 4268001049 2,542 0.06 1/4 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 8,263 12 10063 7,627 202% 2245 4268001050 139,050 3.19 1/4 mile0000
N Commercial BTV
4 556,202 795 100 319
3 417,151 249%
2246 4268001053 304,534 6.99 200'
0000N Commercial BTV4 1,218,136 1,740 140 9794 1,218,136 178% 2247 4268001904 106,798 2.45 1/4 mile0000N Commercial BTV4 427,192 610 100 2453 320,394 249% 2248 4268001905 40,038 0.92 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial BTV4 160,150 229 100 923 120,113 249%
2249 4268002001 76,708 1.76 1/4 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 249,300 356 100 176 3 230,124 202%
2250 4268002003 9,656 0.22 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 31,383 45 80 18 2.5 24,141 253% 2251 4268002005 19,974 0.46 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 64,916 93 80 37 2.5 49,935 253% 2252 4268002007 9,562 0.22 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 31,078 44 80 18 2.5 23,906 253% 2253 4268002010 22,499 0.52 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 73,123 104 80 41 2.5 56,248 253% 2254 4268002011 18,012 0.41 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUC 3.25 58,539 84 80 33 2.5 45,030 253% 2255 4268002012 11,928 0.27 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 38,767 55 80 22 2.5 29,821 253% 2256 4268002013 82,625 1.90 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 268,530 384 80 152 2.5 206,561 253% 2257 4268002015 121,265 2.78 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 394,112 563 80 223 2.5 303,163 253% 2258 4268002016 41,848 0.96 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUC 3.25 136,007 194 80 77 2.5 104,621 253% 2259 4268002018 14,413 0.33 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 46,842 67 80 26 2.5 36,032 253% 2260 4268003002 29,308 0.67 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 95,252 136 80 54 2.5 73,271 253% 2261 4268003003 31,503 0.72 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 102,386 146 80 58 2.5 78,758 253% 2262 4268003006 12,224 0.28 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUC 3.25 39,729 57 80 22 2.5 30,561 253% 2263 4268003007 12,810 0.29 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 41,633 59 80 24 2.5 32,026 253% 2264 4268003008 35,263 0.81 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 114,604 164 80 65 2.5 88,157 253% 2265 4268003009 107,169 2.46 1/4 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 348,299 498 100 2463 321,506 202% 2266 4268003800 80,691 1.85 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 262,245 375 80 148 2.5 201,727 253% 2267 4268003805 84,562 1.94 1/4 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 274,826 393 100 1943 253,685 202% 2268 4268004003 4,809 0.11 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 4,809 3 809 2.5 12,023 36% 2269 4268004004 4,810 0.11 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 4,810 3 809 2.5 12,024 36% 2270 4268004005 4,798 0.11 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 4,798 3 809 2.5 11,996 36% 2271 4268004006 4,796 0.11 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 4,796 3 809 2.5 11,991 36% 2272 4268004007 5,970 0.14 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 5,970 4 80 11 2.5 14,925 36%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
2273 4268004008 5,861 0.13 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R2 291 5,861 4 80 11 2.5 14,651 36%
2274 4268004009 5,514 0.13 1/2 mile0
0 00N Residential R2 291 5,514 4 80 10 2.5 13,786 36%
2275 4268004010 5,505 0.13 1/2 mile0
00 0
N Residential R2 291 5,505 4 80 10 2.5 13,763 36%
2276 4268004012 6,883 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 6,883
5 80 13 2.5 17,207 36%
2277 4268004013 5,788 0.13 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 5,788
4 80 11 2.5 14,469 36%
2278 4268004014 5,788 0.13 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 5,788
4 80 11 2.5 14,470 36%
2279 4268004015 5,788 0.13 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 5,788 4 80 11 2.5 14,469 36%
2280 4268004016 5,800 0.13 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 5,800 4 80 11 2.5 14,500 36%
2281 4268004017 5,788 0.13 1/2 mile
000
0N Residential R2 291 5,788 4 80 11 2.5 14,469 36%
2282 4268004018 6,839 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 6,839
5 80 13 2.5 17,098 36%
2283 4268004019 6,824 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 17,060 24 80 13 2.5 17,060 194% 2284 4268004020 5,778 0.13 1/2 mile0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 14,445 21 80 11 2.5 14,445 194% 2285 4268004021 5,780 0.13 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 14,450 21 80 11 2.5 14,450 194% 2286 4268004022 5,793 0.13 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 14,482 21 80 11 2.5 14,482 194% 2287 4268004023 5,768 0.13 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial CCS 2.5 14,421 21 80 11 2.5 14,421 194% 2288 4268004024 5,793 0.13 1/2 mile0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 14,483 21 80 11 2.5 14,483 194% 2289 4268004030 9,563 0.22 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 9,563 6 80 18 2.5 23,906 36%
2290 4268004038 5,682 0.13 1/2 mile
000
0N Residential R2 29
1 5,682 4 80 10 2.5 14,205 36%
2291 4268004042 17,622 0.40 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 44,056 63 80 32 2.5 44,056 194% 2292 4268004043 11,917 0.27 1/2 mile0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 29,793 43 80 22 2.5 29,793 194% 2293 4268005004 4,925 0.11 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 4,925 3 809 2.5 12,313 36%
2294 4268005005 4,917 0.11 1/2 mile
001
0N Residential R2 29
1 4,917 3 809 2.5 12,292 36%
2295 4268005006 6,014 0.14 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R2 29
1 6,014 4 80 11 2.5 15,034 36%
2296 4268005007 5,594 0.13 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 5,594 4 80 10 2.5 13,984 36%
2297 4268005008 5,363 0.12 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 5,363 4 80 10 2.5 13,406 36%
2298 4268005009 5,389 0.12 1/2 mile
0000
N Residential R2 291 5,389
4 80 10 2.5 13,472 36%
2299 4268005010 5,233 0.12 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 5,233 3 80 10 2.5 13,083 36%
2300 4268005011 5,256 0.12 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 5,256 4 80 10 2.5 13,140 36%
2301 4268005012 5,235 0.12 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 5,235 3 80 10 2.5 13,087 36%
2302 4268005013 5,279 0.12 1/2 mile
0000
N Residential R2 291 5,279 4 80 10 2.5 13,198 36%
2303 4268005014 5,236 0.12 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 5,236 3 80 10 2.5 13,090 36%
2304 4268005015 5,251 0.12 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 5,251 4 80 10 2.5 13,127 36%
2305 4268005016 5,252 0.12 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 5,252 4 80 10 2.5 13,129 36%
2306 4268005018 6,281 0.14 1/2 mile
0010
N Residential R2 291 6,281 4 80 12 2.5 15,702 36%
2307 4268005019 5,272 0.12 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 5,272 4 80 10 2.5 13,181 36%
2308 4268005020 5,272 0.12 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 5,272 4 80 10 2.5 13,180 36%
2309 4268005021 5,273 0.12 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 5,273 4 80 10 2.5 13,183 36% 2310 4268005022 5,279 0.12 1/2 mile
0000
N Residential R2 291 5,279 4 80 10 2.5 13,198 36%
2311 4268005023 5,266 0.12 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 5,266 4 80 10 2.5 13,166 36%
2312 4268005024 5,265 0.12 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 5,265 4 80 10 2.5 13,163 36%
2313 4268005025 5,265 0.12 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 5,265 4 80 10 2.5 13,162 36% 2314 4268005026 5,395 0.12 1/2 mile0000
N Residential R2 29
1 5,395 4 80 10 2.5 13,487 36%
2315 4268005027 5,407 0.12 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 5,407 4 80 10 2.5 13,518 36%
2316 4268005028 5,599 0.13 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 5,599 4 80 10 2.5 13,998 36%
2317 4268005029 15,983 0.37 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 15,983 11 80 29 2.5 39,956 36% 2318 4268005031 6,232 0.14 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 6,232 4 80 11 2.5 15,580 36%
2331 4268006020 6,321 0.15 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 6,321 4 80 12 2.5 15,801 36%
2332 4268006021 6,306 0.14 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 6,306 4 80 12 2.5 15,764 36%
2333 4268006022 6,317 0.15 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 6,317 4 80 12 2.5 15,792 36%
2334 4268006023 6,289 0.14 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 6,289 4 80 12 2.5 15,722 36%
2335 4268006024 6,303 0.14 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 291 6,303 4 80 12 2.5 15,757 36%
2336 4268006025 6,316 0.14 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 6,316 4 80 12 2.5 15,790 36%
2337 4268006027 6,462 0.15 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 6,462 4 80 12 2.5 16,156 36%
2339 4268006033 6,303 0.14 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 6,303 4 80 12 2.5 15,757 36%
2342 4268006051 7,485 0.17 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 291 7,485 5 80 14 2.5 18,712 36%
2357 4268007016 5,983 0.14 1/2 mile0100N Residential R2 29 1 5,983 4 80 11 2.5 14,959 36%
2358 4268007019 5,996 0.14 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 5,996 4 80 11 2.5 14,990 36%
2359 4268007020 6,010 0.14 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 6,010
4 80 11 2.5 15,026 36%
2360 4268007021 6,023 0.14 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R2 291 6,023 4 80 11 2.5 15,058 36%
2361 4268007022 5,969 0.14 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 5,969 4 80 11 2.5 14,923 36% 2362 4268007023 6,021 0.14 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 6,021 4 80 11 2.5 15,052 36% 2363 4268007024 6,008 0.14 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 6,008 4 80 11 2.5 15,021 36% 2364 4268007025 5,994 0.14 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 5,994 4 80 11 2.5 14,986 36% 2365 4268007026 5,994 0.14 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 5,994 4 80 11 2.5 14,984 36% 2366 4268007027 6,007 0.14 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 6,007 4 80 11 2.5 15,018 36% 2367 4268007028 6,007 0.14 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 6,007 4 80 11 2.5 15,018 36% 2368 4268007029 5,979 0.14 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 5,979 4 80 11 2.5 14,947 36% 2369 4268007030 7,514 0.17 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 7,514 5 80 14 2.5 18,785 36% 2371 4268007034 12,048 0.28 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 12,048 8 80 22 2.5 30,121 36%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
2374 4268008001 5,654 0.13 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 291 5,654 4 80 10 2.5 14,134 36%
2375 4268008002 4,535 0.10 1/2 mile0
0 00N Residential R2 291 4,535 3 80
8 2.5 11,338 36%
2376 4268008003 4,528 0.10 1/2 mile0
01 0
N Residential R2 291 4,528 3 80
8 2.5 11,319 36%
2377 4268008004 4,519 0.10 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 4,519
3 808 2.5 11,297 36%
2378 4268008005 4,531 0.10 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 4,531
3 808 2.5 11,328 36%
2379 4268008006 4,530 0.10 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 4,530
3 808 2.5 11,326 36%
2380 4268008007 4,531 0.10 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 4,531 3 808 2.5 11,327 36%
2381 4268008008 4,510 0.10 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 4,510 3 808 2.5 11,276 36%
2382 4268008009 4,543 0.10 1/2 mile
000
0N Residential R2 291 4,543 3 808 2.5 11,356 36%
2383 4268008010 4,524 0.10 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 4,524
3 808 2.5 11,309 36%
2384 4268008011 4,543 0.10 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 4,543 3 808 2.5 11,357 36%
2385 4268008012 4,526 0.10 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 4,526 3 808 2.5 11,314 36% 2386 4268008013 4,538 0.10 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 4,538 3 808 2.5 11,345 36%
2387 4268008014 4,527 0.10 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 4,527
3 808 2.5 11,317 36%
2388 4268008015 4,533 0.10 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 29
1 4,533 3 808 2.5 11,333 36%
2389 4268008019 11,702 0.27 1/2 mile0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 29,255 42 80 21 2.5 29,255 194% 2390 4268008020 11,699 0.27 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 29,247 42 80 21 2.5 29,247 194% 2391 4268008021 11,697 0.27 1/2 mile
000
0N Commercial CCS 2.5 29,242 42 80 21 2.5 29,242 194%
2392 4268008022 8,615 0.20 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 21,538 31 80 16 2.5 21,538 194% 2393 4268008023 13,759 0.32 1/2 mile0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 34,399 49 80 25 2.5 34,399 194% 2394 4268008024 6,885 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 17,213 25 80 13 2.5 17,213 194% 2395 4268008025 2,988 0.07 1/2 mile
000
0N Commercial CCS 2.5 7,470 11 80
5 2.5 7,470 194%
2396 4268008026 3,871 0.09 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial CCS 2.5 9,678 14 80
7 2.5 9,678 194%
2397 4268008027 12,794 0.29 1/2 mile0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 31,985 46 80 23 2.5 31,985 194% 2398 4268009001 6,843 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 17,108 24 80 13 2.5 17,108 194% 2399 4268009008 6,840 0.16 1/2 mile
0000
N Commercial CCS 2.5 17,101 24 80 13 2.5 17,101 194%
2400 4268009009 5,851 0.13 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 14,627 21 80 11 2.5 14,627 194% 2401 4268009010 5,852 0.13 1/2 mile0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 14,630 21 80 11 2.5 14,630 194% 2402 4268009015 30,243 0.69 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 75,608 108 80 56 2.5 75,608 194% 2403 4268009016 53,642 1.23 1/2 mile
0000
N Commercial CCS 2.5 134,104 192 80 99 2.5 134,104 194% 2404 4268009017 23,398 0.54 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 58,495 84 80 43 2.5 58,495 194% 2405 4268009019 11,703 0.27 1/2 mile0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 29,259 42 80 21 2.5 29,259 194% 2406 4268009902 23,431 0.54 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial CCS 2.5 58,577 84 80 43 2.5 58,577 194% 2407 4268010003 12,055 0.28 1/2 mile
0000
N Commercial MUC 3.25 39,179 56 80 22 2.5 30,137 253%
2408 4268010004 14,885 0.34 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 48,377 69 80 27 2.5 37,213 253% 2409 4268010006 15,355 0.35 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 49,904 71 80 28 2.5 38,388 253% 2410 4268010012 10,348 0.24 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 33,631 48 80 19 2.5 25,870 253% 2411 4268010013 9,536 0.22 1/4 mile
0000
N Commercial MUC 3.25 30,991 44 100 223 28,607 202%
2412 4268010015 22,021 0.51 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 71,568 102 80 40 2.5 55,052 253% 2413 4268010017 64,297 1.48 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 208,965 299 80 118 2.5 160,742 253% 2414 4268010018 54,556 1.25 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 177,308 253 80 100 2.5 136,391 253% 2415 4268010019 9,890 0.23 1/2 mile0000
N Commercial MUC 3.25 32,143 46 80 18 2.5 24,725 253%
2416 4268010020 13,885 0.32 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 45,125 64 80 25 2.5 34,711 253% 2417 4268011004 20,010 0.46 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 65,033 93 80 37 2.5 50,025 253% 2418 4268011005 6,325 0.15 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 20,556 29 80 12 2.5 15,812 253% 2419 4268011006 17,921 0.41 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 58,242 83 80 33 2.5 44,802 253% 2420 4268011007 15,595 0.36 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 50,685 72 80 29 2.5 38,988 253% 2421 4268011010 10,286 0.24 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 33,431 48 80 19 2.5 25,716 253% 2423 4268011014 217,690 5.00 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 707,493 1,011 80 400 2.5 544,225 253% 2424 4268011018 38,503 0.88 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 125,135 179 80 71 2.5 96,258 253% 2425 4268011019 42,024 0.96 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUC 3.25 136,578 195 80 77 2.5 105,060 253% 2426 4268011020 36,270 0.83 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 117,878 168 80 67 2.5 90,675 253% 2432 4268013018 18,080 0.42 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial BTV4 72,320 103 100 423 54,240 249%
2433 4268013020 17,104 0.39 1/4 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 55,589 79 100 393 51,313 202% 2434 4268013021 127,848 2.93 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUC 3.25 415,506 594 80 235 2.5 319,620 253% 2435 4268013024 126,746 2.91 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 411,924 588 80 233 2.5 316,865 253% 2436 4268013025 48,296 1.11 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 156,960 224 80 89 2.5 120,739 253% 2438 4268013028 21,787 0.50 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 70,809 101 80 40 2.5 54,469 253% 2439 4268013029 150,362 3.45 1/4 mile0
000N Commercial MUC 3.25 488,675 698 100 3453 451,085 202% 2440 4268013809 68,848 1.58 200'0000N Commercial BTV4 275,393 393 140 2214 275,393 178% 2441 4268013903 135,440 3.11 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 440,181 629 80 249 2.5 338,601 253% 2443 4268013905 417 0.01 200'0000N Commercial BTV4 1,667 2 14014 1,667 178% 2444 4268013906 100,424 2.31 1/4 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 326,377 466 100 2313 301,271 202% 2445 4268013908 65,431 1.50 1/4 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 212,651 304 100 1503 196,293 202% 2446 4268013909 36,672 0.84 1/4 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 119,183 170 100 843 110,015 202% 2447 4268013910 19,392 0.45 200'0000N Commercial CAC 2.5 48,479 69 140 624 77,567 111% 2448 4268013914 27,670 0.64 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 89,926 128 80 51 2.5 69,174 253% 2449 4268013915 120,165 2.76 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 390,537 558 80 221 2.5 300,413 253% 2450 4268013916 38,311 0.88 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3.25 124,510 178 80 70 2.5 95,777 253%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
2451 4268013917 111,126 2.55 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUC 3.25 361,159 516 80 204 2.5 277,815 253% 2452 4268013918 173 0.00 200'0
0 00N Commercial CAC 2.5 432 1 140
14 692 111%
2453 4268013919 409,714 9.41 200'0
00 0
N Commercial CAC 2.5 1,024,284 1,463 140 1317
4 1,638,855 111%
2454 4268014012 539 0.01 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial CAC 2.5 1,347
2 10013 1,616 156%
2455 4268014013 76,561 1.76 200'
0000N Commercial BTV4 306,246 437 140 246
4 306,246 178%
2456 4268014014 50,135 1.15 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial BTV4 200,539 286 100 115
3 150,404 249%
2457 4268014015 63,612 1.46 200'0000N Commercial CAC 2.5 159,031 227 140 204 4 254,449 111%
2458 4268014019 17,564 0.40 1/4 mile0000N Commercial BTV 4 70,254 100 100 40
3 52,691 249%
2459 4268014021 29,066 0.67 1/4 mile
000
0N Commercial CAC 2.5 72,665 104 100 67
3 87,198 156%
2460 4268014025 7,718 0.18 200'
00 00N Commercial BTV4 30,872 44 140 25
4 30,872 178%
2461 4268014030 55,296 1.27 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial CAC 2.5 138,239 197 100 127
3 165,887 156%
2462 4268014900 540 0.01 1/4 mile0000N Commercial CAC 2.5 1,349 2 10013 1,619 156% 2463 4268014901 40,515 0.93 200'
0000N Commercial BTV4 162,061 232 140 130
4 162,061 178%
2464 4268014902 34,865 0.80 1/4 mile
0100N Commercial BTV4 139,461 199 100 80
3 104,595 249%
2465 4268015003 5,060 0.12 1/4 mile0
000N Industrial IC3 15,180 22 100 12
3 15,180 187%
2466 4268015004 5,008 0.11 1/4 mile0000N Industrial IC3 15,025 21 100 113 15,025 187% 2467 4268015013 7,994 0.18 1/4 mile
0000N Industrial IC3 23,982 34 100 18
3 23,982 187%
2468 4268015016 12,215 0.28 1/4 mile
000
0N Industrial IC3 36,645 52 100 28
3 36,645 187%
2469 4268015017 38,264 0.88 1/4 mile
0000N Industrial IC
3 114,791 164 100 883 114,791 187%
2470 4268015018 4,957 0.11 1/4 mile0000N Industrial IC3 14,870 21 100 113 14,870 187% 2471 4268015019 1,081 0.02 1/4 mile
0000N Industrial IC3 3,242 5 1002
3 3,242 187%
2472 4268015020 10,669 0.24 1/4 mile
000
0N Industrial IC3 32,006 46 100 24
3 32,006 187%
2473 4268015901 26,466 0.61 1/4 mile0
000N Industrial IC3 79,397 113 100 61
3 79,397 187%
2474 4268016004 7,497 0.17 1/4 mile0000N Industrial IC3 22,490 32 100 173 22,490 187% 2475 4268016007 7,018 0.16 1/4 mile
0000N Industrial IC3 21,054 30 100 16
3 21,054 187%
2476 4268016009 203,064 4.66 1/4 mile
0110
N Industrial IC3 609,191 870 100 4663 609,191 187%
2477 4268016902 813,596 18.68 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial CAC 2.5 2,033,989 2,906 100 1868
3 2,440,787 156%
2478 4268017011 2,752 0.06 1/4 mile0000N Industrial IC
3 8,256 12 10063 8,256 187%
2479 4268017020 8,758 0.20 1/4 mile
0000N Industrial IC3 26,273 38 100 203 26,273 187%
2480 4268017021 6,233 0.14 1/4 mile
0000
N Industrial IC3 18,699 27 100 143 18,699 187%
2481 4268017022 28,242 0.65 1/4 mile
0000N Industrial IC
3 84,726 121 100 653 84,726 187%
2482 4268018046 200,683 4.61 1/4 mile0000N Commercial OC 2.75 551,878 788 100 461 3 602,049 171%
2483 4268018047 195,603 4.49 200'
0000N Commercial OC 2.75 537,908 768 140 6294 782,411 122% 2485 4268018049 145,768 3.35 1/4 mile
0000
N Commercial OC 2.75 400,861 573 100 3353 437,303 171%
2486 4268019019 4,931 0.11 1/4 mile
0011N Residential R2 29
1 4,931 3 100 11
3 14,792 29%
2487 4268019020 5,010 0.12 1/4 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 5,010 3 100 123 15,031 29%
2488 4268019021 4,996 0.11 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 4,996 3 809 2.5 12,491 36% 2489 4268019022 4,995 0.11 1/2 mile
0011
N Residential R2 291 4,995 3 809 2.5 12,489 36%
2490 4268019023 5,010 0.12 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 5,010 3 80
9 2.5 12,525 36%
2491 4268019024 4,995 0.11 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 4,995 3 809 2.5 12,488 36%
2492 4268019025 5,011 0.12 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 5,011 3 809 2.5 12,527 36% 2493 4268019026 4,995 0.11 1/2 mile0001
N Residential R2 29
1 4,995 3 80
9 2.5 12,487 36%
2494 4268019027 5,010 0.12 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 5,010 3 809 2.5 12,524 36%
2495 4268019028 4,995 0.11 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 4,995 3 809 2.5 12,487 36%
2496 4268019029 5,003 0.11 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 5,003 3 809 2.5 12,509 36%
2497 4268019030 4,990 0.11 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 4,990 3 809 2.5 12,475 36%
2498 4268019031 6,495 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,572 6,495 80 12 2.5 16,238 54450% 2499 4268019032 6,489 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,569 6,489 80 12 2.5 16,222 54450%
2500 4268019033 6,498 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,574 6,498 80 12 2.5 16,246 54450% 2501 4268019034 6,529 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,591 6,529 80 12 2.5 16,322 54450% 2502 4268019035 6,493 0.15 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,571 6,493 80 12 2.5 16,233 54450% 2503 4268019036 6,493 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,571 6,493 80 12 2.5 16,232 54450%
2504 4268019037 6,495 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,572 6,495 80 12 2.5 16,238 54450% 2505 4268019038 6,510 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,580 6,510 80 12 2.5 16,274 54450%
2506 4268019039 6,235 0.14 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,429 6,235 80 11 2.5 15,587 54450% 2507 4268019040 5,860 0.13 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,223 5,860 80 11 2.5 14,649 54450%
2508 4268019041 7,046 0.16 1/4 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,875 7,046 100 163 21,137 43560% 2509 4268019900 3,526 0.08 1/4 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 3,526
2 10083 10,577 29%
2510 4268020021 5,223 0.12 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R1 1 0.55 2,873 5,223 80 10 2.5 13,058 54450% 2511 4268020022 6,524 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,588 6,524 80 12 2.5 16,310 54450% 2512 4268020023 6,494 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,572 6,494 80 12 2.5 16,236 54450% 2513 4268020024 6,488 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,568 6,488 80 12 2.5 16,219 54450% 2514 4268020025 6,494 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,572 6,494 80 12 2.5 16,235 54450% 2515 4268020026 6,497 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,573 6,497 80 12 2.5 16,243 54450% 2516 4268020027 6,519 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,585 6,519 80 12 2.5 16,298 54450% 2517 4268020028 6,494 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,572 6,494 80 12 2.5 16,236 54450% 2518 4268020029 6,496 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,573 6,496 80 12 2.5 16,239 54450% 2519 4268020030 6,496 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,573 6,496 80 12 2.5 16,241 54450% 2520 4268020031 6,491 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,570 6,491 80 12 2.5 16,228 54450%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
2521 4268020032 6,501 0.15 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,576 6,501 80 12 2.5 16,253 54450% 2522 4268020033 6,533 0.15 1/2 mile0
0 01N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,593 6,533 80 12 2.5 16,333 54450% 2523 4268020034 6,557 0.15 1/2 mile0
00 1
N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,606 6,557 80 12 2.5 16,392 54450% 2524 4268020035 7,625 0.18 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1
1 0.55 4,193 7,625 80 14 2.5 19,061 54450%
2525 4268020036 6,750 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,713 6,750 80 12 2.5 16,876 54450% 2526 4268021015 6,498 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,574 6,498 80 12 2.5 16,244 54450% 2527 4268021016 6,530 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,592 6,530 80 12 2.5 16,326 54450%
2528 4268021017 6,491 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,570 6,491 80 12 2.5 16,226 54450%
2529 4268021018 6,498 0.15 1/2 mile
000
1N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,574 6,498 80 12 2.5 16,245 54450% 2530 4268021019 6,500 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,575 6,500 80 12 2.5 16,249 54450% 2531 4268021020 6,508 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,579 6,508 80 12 2.5 16,269 54450% 2532 4268021021 6,515 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,583 6,515 80 12 2.5 16,286 54450% 2533 4268021022 6,498 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,574 6,498 80 12 2.5 16,246 54450% 2534 4268021023 6,501 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,575 6,501 80 12 2.5 16,252 54450% 2535 4268021024 6,492 0.15 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,571 6,492 80 12 2.5 16,230 54450% 2536 4268021025 6,528 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,590 6,528 80 12 2.5 16,320 54450% 2537 4268021026 6,497 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,573 6,497 80 12 2.5 16,243 54450% 2538 4268021027 6,693 0.15 1/2 mile
000
1N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,681 6,693 80 12 2.5 16,734 54450% 2539 4268021028 6,694 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1
1 0.55 3,682 6,694 80 12 2.5 16,735 54450%
2540 4268021029 6,497 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,573 6,497 80 12 2.5 16,241 54450% 2541 4268021030 6,492 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,571 6,492 80 12 2.5 16,230 54450% 2542 4268021031 6,533 0.15 1/2 mile
000
1N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,593 6,533 80 12 2.5 16,333 54450% 2543 4268021032 6,501 0.15 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,575 6,501 80 12 2.5 16,252 54450% 2544 4268021033 6,496 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,573 6,496 80 12 2.5 16,239 54450% 2545 4268021034 6,496 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,573 6,496 80 12 2.5 16,240 54450% 2546 4268021035 6,532 0.15 1/2 mile
0001
N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,593 6,532 80 12 2.5 16,331 54450% 2547 4268021036 6,500 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1
1 0.55 3,575 6,500 80 12 2.5 16,250 54450%
2548 4268021037 6,494 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,572 6,494 80 12 2.5 16,234 54450%
2549 4268021038 6,503 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,576 6,503 80 12 2.5 16,257 54450% 2550 4268021039 6,501 0.15 1/2 mile
0001
N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,575 6,501 80 12 2.5 16,251 54450% 2551 4268021040 6,529 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1
1 0.55 3,591 6,529 80 12 2.5 16,321 54450%
2552 4268022001 4,992 0.11 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 4,992 3 809 2.5 12,479 36%
2553 4268022002 5,005 0.11 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 5,005 3 809 2.5 12,513 36%
2554 4268022003 5,010 0.12 1/2 mile
0001
N Residential R2 291 5,010 3 809 2.5 12,524 36%
2555 4268022004 4,994 0.11 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 4,994 3 80
9 2.5 12,484 36%
2556 4268022005 4,996 0.11 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 4,996 3 809 2.5 12,490 36%
2557 4268022006 5,006 0.11 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 5,006 3 809 2.5 12,516 36% 2558 4268022007 4,995 0.11 1/2 mile
0011
N Residential R2 291 4,995 3 809 2.5 12,487 36%
2559 4268022008 5,008 0.11 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 29
1 5,008 3 80
9 2.5 12,521 36%
2560 4268022009 4,994 0.11 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 4,994 3 809 2.5 12,485 36%
2561 4268022010 5,011 0.12 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 5,011 3 809 2.5 12,527 36% 2562 4268022011 4,992 0.11 1/2 mile0011
N Residential R2 29
1 4,992 3 80
9 2.5 12,480 36%
2563 4268022012 5,004 0.11 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 5,004 3 809 2.5 12,510 36%
2564 4268022013 5,141 0.12 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 5,141 3 809 2.5 12,854 36%
2565 4268022014 6,693 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,681 6,693 80 12 2.5 16,733 54450% 2566 4268022015 6,497 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,573 6,497 80 12 2.5 16,243 54450% 2567 4268022016 6,491 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,570 6,491 80 12 2.5 16,228 54450% 2568 4268022017 6,532 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,593 6,532 80 12 2.5 16,330 54450%
2569 4268022018 6,501 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,576 6,501 80 12 2.5 16,253 54450% 2570 4268022019 6,500 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,575 6,500 80 12 2.5 16,249 54450% 2571 4268022020 6,493 0.15 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,571 6,493 80 12 2.5 16,232 54450% 2572 4268022021 6,517 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,584 6,517 80 12 2.5 16,292 54450%
2573 4268022022 6,516 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,584 6,516 80 12 2.5 16,290 54450% 2574 4268022023 6,495 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,572 6,495 80 12 2.5 16,237 54450%
2575 4268022024 6,495 0.15 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,572 6,495 80 12 2.5 16,238 54450% 2576 4268022025 6,499 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,575 6,499 80 12 2.5 16,248 54450%
2577 4268022026 6,528 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,590 6,528 80 12 2.5 16,319 54450% 2578 4268023001 5,011 0.12 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 5,011
3 809 2.5 12,527 36%
2579 4268023002 5,001 0.11 1/2 mile0
011N Residential R2 291 5,001 3 809 2.5 12,503 36%
2599 4268023022 6,529 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,591 6,529 80 12 2.5 16,323 54450% 2600 4268024001 6,497 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,573 6,497 80 12 2.5 16,243 54450% 2704 4270001023 18,171 0.42 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 2.25 40,886 58 80 33 2.5 45,428 175% 2705 4270001024 7,793 0.18 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 2.25 17,534 25 80 14 2.5 19,483 175% 2706 4270001025 5,453 0.13 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 2.25 12,268 18 80 10 2.5 13,632 175% 4139 4273006002 8,983 0.21 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 2.25 20,212 29 80 16 2.5 22,458 175% 4140 4273006003 4,493 0.10 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 2.25 10,109 14 808 2.5 11,232 175% 4141 4273006004 9,945 0.23 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 2.25 22,376 32 80 18 2.5 24,862 175% 4181 4273007001 15,721 0.36 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 2.25 35,372 51 80 29 2.5 39,302 175% 4220 4273007042 13,493 0.31 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 2.25 30,360 43 80 25 2.5 33,733 175%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
4243 4273008023 31,466 0.72 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 102,263 146 80 58 2.5 78,664 253% 4655 4274001036 6,959 0.16 1/2 mile0
0 11N Residential R2 291 6,959 5 80 13 2.5 17,398 36%
4656 4274001038 7,980 0.18 1/2 mile0
00 1
N Residential R2 291 7,980 5 80 15 2.5 19,950 36%
4657 4274001043 80,166 1.84 1/2 mile
0111N Residential R2 29
1 80,166 53 80 147 2.5 200,415 36%
4658 4274001045 38,950 0.89 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 29
1 38,950 26 80 72 2.5 97,375 36%
4660 4274002037 43,393 1.00 1/2 mile
0101N Residential R2 29
1 43,393 29 80 80 2.5 108,482 36%
4661 4274002038 44,328 1.02 1/2 mile0101N Residential R2 29 1 44,328 30 80 81 2.5 110,819 36%
4662 4274003025 7,734 0.18 1/2 mile0101N Residential R2 29 1 7,734 5 80 14 2.5 19,334 36%
4663 4274003026 11,636 0.27 1/2 mile
010
1N Residential R2 291 11,636 8 80 21 2.5 29,090 36%
4664 4274003032 20,800 0.48 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 20,800 14 80 38 2.5 52,000 36% 4665 4274003036 6,800 0.16 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 6,800 5 80 12 2.5 17,000 36%
4666 4274004028 12,386 0.28 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 12,386 8 80 23 2.5 30,966 36% 4667 4274004043 20,493 0.47 1/2 mile
0111N Residential R2 29
1 20,493 14 80 38 2.5 51,233 36%
4668 4274004044 14,073 0.32 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 14,073
9 80 26 2.5 35,183 36%
4669 4274004045 14,834 0.34 1/2 mile0
011N Residential R2 29
1 14,834 10 80 27 2.5 37,085 36%
4670 4274004054 15,438 0.35 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 15,438 10 80 28 2.5 38,595 36% 4671 4274004056 32,412 0.74 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 32,412 22 80 60 2.5 81,030 36%
4672 4274004057 39,992 0.92 1/2 mile
001
1N Residential R2 29
1 39,992 27 80 73 2.5 99,980 36%
4673 4274004058 27,371 0.63 1/2 mile
0111N Residential R2 29
1 27,371 18 80 50 2.5 68,427 36%
4674 4274004059 28,632 0.66 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 28,632 19 80 53 2.5 71,580 36% 4675 4274004061 12,596 0.29 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 12,596 8 80 23 2.5 31,491 36%
4676 4274004072 15,197 0.35 1/2 mile
000
1N Residential R2 29
1 15,197 10 80 28 2.5 37,994 36%
4677 4274005013 7,748 0.18 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R2 29
1 7,748 5 80 14 2.5 19,371 36%
4678 4274005014 15,464 0.36 1/2 mile0111N Residential R2 29 1 15,464 10 80 28 2.5 38,661 36%
4679 4274005015 11,170 0.26 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 11,170 7 80 21 2.5 27,926 36%
4680 4274005016 7,765 0.18 1/2 mile
0011
N Residential R2 291 7,765
5 80 14 2.5 19,412 36%
4681 4274005017 25,120 0.58 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 25,120 17 80 46 2.5 62,801 36%
4682 4274005018 5,651 0.13 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 5,651 4 80 10 2.5 14,127 36%
4683 4274005019 5,029 0.12 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 5,029 3 809 2.5 12,572 36%
4684 4274005022 8,171 0.19 1/2 mile
0011
N Residential R2 291 8,171 5 80 15 2.5 20,428 36%
4685 4274005023 6,720 0.15 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 29
1 6,720 4 80 12 2.5 16,801 36%
4686 4274005026 11,236 0.26 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 11,236 7 80 21 2.5 28,090 36%
4687 4274005027 6,275 0.14 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 6,275 4 80 12 2.5 15,689 36%
4688 4274005028 7,524 0.17 1/2 mile
0011
N Residential R2 291 7,524 5 80 14 2.5 18,811 36%
4689 4274005029 14,923 0.34 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 14,923 10 80 27 2.5 37,307 36%
4690 4274005030 27,676 0.64 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 27,676 18 80 51 2.5 69,191 36%
4691 4274005031 12,238 0.28 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 12,238 8 80 22 2.5 30,594 36%
4692 4274005035 22,345 0.51 1/2 mile
0001
N Residential R2 291 22,345 15 80 41 2.5 55,863 36%
4693 4274005058 39,939 0.92 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 39,939 27 80 73 2.5 99,849 36%
4694 4274005901 12,627 0.29 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 12,627 8 80 23 2.5 31,569 36%
4695 4274005902 13,287 0.31 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 13,287 9 80 24 2.5 33,217 36% 4696 4274005903 211,504 4.86 1/2 mile0001
N Residential R2 29
1 211,504 141 80 388 2.5 528,759 36%
4697 4274006023 17,664 0.41 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial MUBL 3.25 57,409 82 80 32 2.5 44,161 253% 4698 4274006024 17,663 0.41 1/2 mile0111N Commercial MUBL 3.25 57,404 82 80 32 2.5 44,157 253% 4699 4274006025 85,435 1.96 1/2 mile
0011N Commercial MUBL 3.25 277,664 397 80 157 2.5 213,588 253% 4700 4274006026 91,741 2.11 1/2 mile0001N Commercial MUBL 3.25 298,158 426 80 168 2.5 229,352 253% 4701 4274007009 37,071 0.85 1/2 mile
0101N Residential R2 291 37,071 25 80 68 2.5 92,678 36% 4702 4274007010 11,800 0.27 1/2 mile0011N Commercial MUBL 3.25 38,348 55 80 22 2.5 29,499 253% 4703 4274007011 11,778 0.27 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 11,778 8 80 22 2.5 29,445 36%
4704 4274007013 9,455 0.22 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 9,455 6 80 17 2.5 23,638 36%
4705 4274007014 12,379 0.28 1/2 mile0
011N Residential R2 291 12,379 8 80 23 2.5 30,948 36%
4706 4274007015 11,562 0.27 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 11,562 8 80 21 2.5 28,905 36%
4707 4274007016 11,075 0.25 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 11,075 7 80 20 2.5 27,687 36%
4708 4274007017 16,496 0.38 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 16,496 11 80 30 2.5 41,240 36%
4709 4274007018 16,535 0.38 1/2 mile0
011N Residential R2 291 16,535 11 80 30 2.5 41,338 36%
4710 4274007019 11,038 0.25 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 11,038 7 80 20 2.5 27,594 36%
4711 4274007020 11,584 0.27 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 11,584 8 80 21 2.5 28,959 36%
4712 4274007021 24,722 0.57 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 24,722 16 80 45 2.5 61,805 36%
4713 4274007022 13,805 0.32 1/2 mile0
001N Commercial MUBL 3.25 44,866 64 80 25 2.5 34,512 253% 4714 4274007023 8,281 0.19 1/2 mile0001N Commercial MUBL 3.25 26,913 38 80 15 2.5 20,703 253% 4715 4274007024 47,167 1.08 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 47,167 31 80 87 2.5 117,916 36% 4716 4274007901 63,959 1.47 1/2 mile0001N Commercial MUBL 3.25 207,866 297 80 117 2.5 159,897 253% 4717 4274008026 5,785 0.13 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 5,785 4 80 11 2.5 14,462 36% 4718 4274008028 5,791 0.13 1/2 mile0101N Residential R2 291 5,791 4 80 11 2.5 14,478 36% 4719 4274008029 5,770 0.13 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 5,770 4 80 11 2.5 14,426 36% 4720 4274008030 5,774 0.13 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 5,774 4 80 11 2.5 14,435 36% 4721 4274008032 17,179 0.39 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 17,179 11 80 32 2.5 42,946 36% 4722 4274008033 14,417 0.33 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 14,417 10 80 26 2.5 36,043 36% 4723 4274008035 8,361 0.19 1/2 mile0001N Commercial MUBL 3.25 27,174 39 80 15 2.5 20,903 253%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
4724 4274008036 8,885 0.20 1/2 mile0
001N Commercial MUBL 3.25 28,875 41 80 16 2.5 22,212 253% 4725 4274008037 9,375 0.22 1/2 mile0
0 01N Residential R2 291 9,375 6 80 17 2.5 23,439 36%
4726 4274008038 20,897 0.48 1/2 mile0
01 1
N Residential R2 291 20,897 14 80 38 2.5 52,242 36%
4727 4274008039 5,528 0.13 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial MUBL 3.25 17,964 26 80 10 2.5 13,819 253% 4728 4274008040 8,121 0.19 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial MUBL 3.25 26,394 38 80 15 2.5 20,303 253% 4729 4274008041 6,795 0.16 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,082 32 80 12 2.5 16,986 253% 4730 4274008042 5,718 0.13 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 5,718 4 80 11 2.5 14,295 36%
4731 4274008043 5,775 0.13 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 5,775 4 80 11 2.5 14,438 36%
4732 4274008044 5,770 0.13 1/2 mile
000
1N Residential R2 291 5,770 4 80 11 2.5 14,426 36%
4733 4274008046 38,811 0.89 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 38,811 26 80 71 2.5 97,027 36% 4734 4274008078 5,673 0.13 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 5,673 4 80 10 2.5 14,182 36%
4738 4274009017 7,494 0.17 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 7,494 5 80 14 2.5 18,735 36% 4740 4274009019 6,037 0.14 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 6,037 4 80 11 2.5 15,093 36%
4895 4274019001 7,609 0.17 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 7,609
5 80 14 2.5 19,022 36%
4897 4274019003 7,596 0.17 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R2 29
1 7,596 5 80 14 2.5 18,989 36%
4899 4274019005 7,595 0.17 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 7,595 5 80 14 2.5 18,987 36% 4925 4274019042 11,383 0.26 1/2 mile
0111N Residential R2 29
1 11,383 8 80 21 2.5 28,457 36%
4927 4274019044 7,608 0.17 1/2 mile
010
1N Residential R2 29
1 7,608 5 80 14 2.5 19,020 36%
4928 4274019045 7,994 0.18 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 29
1 7,994 5 80 15 2.5 19,985 36%
4929 4274019046 7,597 0.17 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 7,597 5 80 14 2.5 18,993 36% 4935 4274020001 9,231 0.21 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 9,231 6 80 17 2.5 23,077 36%
4936 4274020002 7,098 0.16 1/2 mile
001
1N Residential R2 29
1 7,098 5 80 13 2.5 17,746 36%
4937 4274020003 14,240 0.33 1/2 mile0
011N Residential R2 29
1 14,240 9 80 26 2.5 35,600 36%
4938 4274020004 11,864 0.27 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 11,864 8 80 22 2.5 29,660 36%
4939 4274020005 10,765 0.25 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 10,765 7 80 20 2.5 26,914 36%
4940 4274020006 10,758 0.25 1/2 mile
0011
N Residential R2 291 10,758 7 80 20 2.5 26,895 36%
4941 4274020007 6,723 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 6,723 4 80 12 2.5 16,807 36%
4942 4274020008 6,343 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 6,343 4 80 12 2.5 15,857 36%
4947 4274020020 40,516 0.93 1/2 mile
0111N Residential R2 291 40,516 27 80 74 2.5 101,291 36% 4951 4274021001 7,538 0.17 1/2 mile
0011
N Residential R2 291 7,538 5 80 14 2.5 18,846 36%
4952 4274021002 5,991 0.14 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 5,991 4 80 11 2.5 14,976 36%
4953 4274021003 5,402 0.12 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 5,402 4 80 10 2.5 13,504 36%
4954 4274021004 4,518 0.10 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 4,518 3 808 2.5 11,294 36%
4955 4274021005 4,492 0.10 1/2 mile
0001
N Residential R2 291 4,492 3 808 2.5 11,230 36%
4956 4274021006 4,516 0.10 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 4,516 3 80
8 2.5 11,289 36%
4957 4274021007 4,492 0.10 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 4,492 3 808 2.5 11,231 36%
4958 4274021008 5,863 0.13 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 5,863 4 80 11 2.5 14,657 36% 4959 4274021009 4,522 0.10 1/2 mile
0001
N Residential R2 291 4,522 3 808 2.5 11,306 36%
4960 4274021010 4,492 0.10 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 4,492 3 80
8 2.5 11,231 36%
4961 4274021011 4,509 0.10 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 4,509 3 808 2.5 11,272 36%
4962 4274021013 19,067 0.44 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 19,067 13 80 35 2.5 47,669 36% 4963 4274021014 28,593 0.66 1/2 mile0011
N Residential R2 29
1 28,593 19 80 53 2.5 71,483 36%
4964 4274021015 28,585 0.66 1/2 mile
0111N Residential R2 291 28,585 19 80 52 2.5 71,462 36% 4966 4274021017 47,749 1.10 1/2 mile0111N Residential R2 29 1 47,749 32 80 88 2.5 119,372 36%
4967 4274021019 19,134 0.44 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 19,134 13 80 35 2.5 47,835 36% 4968 4274022001 4,193 0.10 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 4,193 3 808 2.5 10,482 36%
4969 4274022002 4,500 0.10 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 4,500 3 808 2.5 11,251 36%
4970 4274022003 5,261 0.12 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 5,261 4 80 10 2.5 13,152 36%
4971 4274022004 7,776 0.18 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 7,776 5 80 14 2.5 19,441 36%
4972 4274022005 7,750 0.18 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 7,750 5 80 14 2.5 19,374 36%
4973 4274022006 7,760 0.18 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R2 291 7,760 5 80 14 2.5 19,401 36%
4974 4274022008 6,967 0.16 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 6,967 5 80 13 2.5 17,419 36%
4975 4274022009 7,761 0.18 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 7,761 5 80 14 2.5 19,404 36%
4976 4274022010 7,747 0.18 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 7,747 5 80 14 2.5 19,367 36%
4977 4274022011 7,787 0.18 1/2 mile0
011N Residential R2 291 7,787 5 80 14 2.5 19,467 36%
4978 4274022012 7,732 0.18 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 29 1 7,732 5 80 14 2.5 19,330 36%
4979 4274022013 4,588 0.11 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 4,588 3 808 2.5 11,469 36%
4980 4274022014 4,497 0.10 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 4,497
3 808 2.5 11,242 36%
4981 4274022015 4,906 0.11 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R2 291 4,906 3 809 2.5 12,264 36%
4982 4274022021 9,768 0.22 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 9,768 7 80 18 2.5 24,420 36% 4983 4274022023 7,775 0.18 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 7,775 5 80 14 2.5 19,438 36% 4985 4274023003 5,269 0.12 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 5,269 4 80 10 2.5 13,172 36% 4986 4274023004 5,252 0.12 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 5,252 4 80 10 2.5 13,130 36% 4987 4274023005 5,264 0.12 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 5,264 4 80 10 2.5 13,160 36% 4988 4274023006 5,259 0.12 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 5,259 4 80 10 2.5 13,148 36% 4989 4274023010 1,936 0.04 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 1,936 1 804 2.5 4,841 36% 4990 4274023014 6,899 0.16 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 6,899 5 80 13 2.5 17,248 36% 4991 4274023016 5,247 0.12 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 5,247 3 80 10 2.5 13,118 36% 4992 4274023018 38,291 0.88 1/2 mile0011N Residential R2 291 38,291 26 80 70 2.5 95,728 36%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
4993 4274023020 38,926 0.89 1/2 mile0
011N Residential R2 291 38,926 26 80 71 2.5 97,315 36%
4995 4274023024 19,857 0.46 1/2 mile0
0 11N Residential R2 291 19,857 13 80 36 2.5 49,642 36% 4996 4274023041 14,688 0.34 1/2 mile0
01 1
N Residential R2 291 14,688 10 80 27 2.5 36,721 36%
4997 4274023055 25,339 0.58 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 29
1 25,339 17 80 47 2.5 63,348 36%
4998 4274023057 5,224 0.12 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 5,224
3 80 10 2.5 13,059 36%
4999 4274024013 13,359 0.31 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 29
1 13,359
9 80 25 2.5 33,396 36%
5000 4274024014 4,754 0.11 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 4,754 3 809 2.5 11,886 36%
5001 4274024015 5,697 0.13 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 5,697 4 80 10 2.5 14,243 36%
5002 4274024017 5,510 0.13 1/2 mile
000
1N Residential R2 291 5,510 4 80 10 2.5 13,776 36%
5003 4274024021 6,617 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 6,617
4 80 12 2.5 16,541 36%
5004 4274024025 52,998 1.22 1/2 mile
0101N Residential R2 29
1 52,998 35 80 97 2.5 132,496 36%
5005 4274024900 214,943 4.93 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 214,943 143 80 395 2.5 537,358 36% 5006 4274024901 9,498 0.22 1/2 mile
0001Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 17 2.5 23,744 0%
5007 4274024902 9,788 0.22 1/2 mile
0001Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 18 2.5 24,469 0%
5008 4274024903 18,708 0.43 1/2 mile0
001Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 34 2.5 46,770 0%
5009 4274024904 30,628 0.70 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 30,628 20 80 56 2.5 76,571 36% 5010 4274024905 7,519 0.17 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 7,519 5 80 14 2.5 18,797 36%
5011 4274024906 77,820 1.79 1/2 mile
000
1Y Open Space OS0 -
- 80 143 2.5 194,549 0%
5012 4274024907 17,002 0.39 1/2 mile
0001Y Open Space OS
0 - - 80 31 2.5 42,506 0%
5013 4274025001 7,251 0.17 1/2 mile0001Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 13 2.5 18,128 0% 5014 4274025002 7,253 0.17 1/2 mile
0001Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 13 2.5 18,133 0%
5015 4274025004 7,516 0.17 1/2 mile
001
1Y Open Space OS0 -
- 80 14 2.5 18,789 0%
5016 4274025005 7,541 0.17 1/2 mile0
001Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 14 2.5 18,853 0%
5017 4274025006 7,486 0.17 1/2 mile0011Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 14 2.5 18,715 0% 5018 4274025007 5,129 0.12 1/2 mile
0001Y Open Space OS0 - - 809 2.5 12,823 0%
5019 4274025014 7,491 0.17 1/2 mile
0001
Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 14 2.5 18,728 0%
5020 4274025900 5,130 0.12 1/2 mile
0001Y Open Space OS
0 - - 809 2.5 12,824 0%
5021 4274025901 16,004 0.37 1/2 mile0001Y Open Space OS 0 - - 80 29 2.5 40,009 0%
5022 4274026006 6,746 0.15 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 291 6,746 4 80 12 2.5 16,865 36%
5023 4274026009 7,108 0.16 1/2 mile
0011
N Residential R2 291 7,108 5 80 13 2.5 17,769 36%
5024 4274026011 7,132 0.16 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 7,132 5 80 13 2.5 17,829 36%
5025 4274026013 7,145 0.16 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 7,145 5 80 13 2.5 17,862 36%
5026 4274026015 7,112 0.16 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 7,112 5 80 13 2.5 17,779 36%
5033 4274026023 7,110 0.16 1/2 mile
0011
N Residential R2 291 7,110 5 80 13 2.5 17,776 36%
5034 4274026024 6,724 0.15 1/2 mile
0011N Residential R2 29
1 6,724 4 80 12 2.5 16,810 36%
5035 4274026025 13,443 0.31 1/2 mile0111N Residential R2 29 1 13,443 9 80 25 2.5 33,608 36%
5036 4274026026 28,928 0.66 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 28,928 19 80 53 2.5 72,320 36% 5050 4274028010 6,096 0.14 1/2 mile
0001
N Residential R2 291 6,096 4 80 11 2.5 15,239 36%
5051 4274028011 7,194 0.17 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 29
1 7,194 5 80 13 2.5 17,986 36%
5052 4274028012 6,134 0.14 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,374 6,134 80 11 2.5 15,335 54450%
5053 4274028020 6,656 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,661 6,656 80 12 2.5 16,640 54450% 5054 4274028021 5,082 0.12 1/2 mile0001
N Residential R2 29
1 5,082 3 80
9 2.5 12,705 36%
5055 4274028022 6,871 0.16 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,779 6,871 80 13 2.5 17,177 54450% 5056 4274030001 6,081 0.14 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,345 6,081 80 11 2.5 15,203 54450%
5057 4274030002 6,505 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,577 6,505 80 12 2.5 16,261 54450% 5058 4274030003 6,503 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,577 6,503 80 12 2.5 16,258 54450% 5059 4274030004 6,499 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,575 6,499 80 12 2.5 16,248 54450% 5060 4274030005 6,182 0.14 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,400 6,182 80 11 2.5 15,455 54450%
5068 4274030018 6,507 0.15 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,579 6,507 80 12 2.5 16,268 54450% 5069 4274030019 7,917 0.18 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 4,355 7,917 80 15 2.5 19,794 54450% 5073 4274031001 5,826 0.13 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,205 5,826 80 11 2.5 14,566 54450% 5074 4274031002 5,861 0.13 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,223 5,861 80 11 2.5 14,652 54450%
5075 4274031003 5,838 0.13 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,211 5,838 80 11 2.5 14,595 54450% 5076 4274031004 5,862 0.13 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,224 5,862 80 11 2.5 14,655 54450%
5083 4274031011 5,542 0.13 1/2 mile0
001N Residential R2 291 5,542 4 80 10 2.5 13,854 36%
5084 4274031012 11,101 0.25 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 11,101 7 80 20 2.5 27,752 36%
5085 4274031013 5,558 0.13 1/2 mile
0001N Residential R2 291 5,558 4 80 10 2.5 13,896 36%
5086 4274031014 5,589 0.13 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 29 1 5,589
4 80 10 2.5 13,973 36%
5087 4274031016 6,858 0.16 1/2 mile0
011N Residential R2 291 6,858 5 80 13 2.5 17,145 36%
5088 4274031017 6,841 0.16 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 6,841 5 80 13 2.5 17,103 36% 5089 4274031018 6,870 0.16 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 3,778 6,870 80 13 2.5 17,175 54450% 5090 4274031019 8,805 0.20 1/2 mile0001N Residential R1 1 0.55 4,843 8,805 80 16 2.5 22,012 54450% 5091 4274031020 6,393 0.15 1/2 mile0001N Residential R2 291 6,393 4 80 12 2.5 15,982 36% 5171 4275001005 7,003 0.16 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,003 5 80 13 2.5 17,508 36% 5172 4275001006 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 7,000 5 80 13 2.5 17,500 36% 5173 4275001007 8,400 0.19 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 8,400 6 80 15 2.5 21,000 36% 5174 4275001008 5,600 0.13 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 5,600 4 80 10 2.5 14,000 36% 5175 4275001009 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 7,000 5 80 13 2.5 17,500 36% 5176 4275001010 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 7,000 5 80 13 2.5 17,500 36%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
5177 4275001011 6,988 0.16 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,711 32 80 13 2.5 17,470 253% 5178 4275001012 7,002 0.16 1/2 mile0
0 00N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,755 33 80 13 2.5 17,504 253% 5179 4275001013 7,002 0.16 1/2 mile0
00 0
N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,755 33 80 13 2.5 17,504 253%
5180 4275001014 7,001 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,755 33 80 13 2.5 17,504 253% 5181 4275001018 6,994 0.16 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 6,994
5 80 13 2.5 17,485 36%
5182 4275001020 6,999 0.16 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 6,999
5 80 13 2.5 17,498 36%
5183 4275001021 6,999 0.16 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 6,999 5 80 13 2.5 17,499 36%
5184 4275001022 13,999 0.32 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 13,999 9 80 26 2.5 34,998 36%
5185 4275001023 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile
000
0N Residential R2 291 7,000 5 80 13 2.5 17,499 36%
5186 4275001024 20,962 0.48 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 68,126 97 80 38 2.5 52,405 253% 5187 4275001025 6,994 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 6,994 5 80 13 2.5 17,486 36%
5188 4275001027 7,004 0.16 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 7,004 5 80 13 2.5 17,511 36% 5189 4275001033 7,004 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,763 33 80 13 2.5 17,510 253% 5190 4275001039 6,887 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 6,887
5 80 13 2.5 17,218 36%
5191 4275001045 7,004 0.16 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 29
1 7,004 5 80 13 2.5 17,510 36%
5192 4275002001 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,751 33 80 13 2.5 17,501 253% 5193 4275002002 6,999 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,746 32 80 13 2.5 17,497 253% 5194 4275002003 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile
000
0N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,751 33 80 13 2.5 17,501 253% 5195 4275002004 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,750 32 80 13 2.5 17,500 253% 5196 4275002005 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,000 5 80 13 2.5 17,500 36% 5197 4275002006 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,000 5 80 13 2.5 17,501 36%
5198 4275002007 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile
001
0N Residential R2 29
1 7,000 5 80 13 2.5 17,500 36%
5199 4275002010 7,000 0.16 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R2 29
1 7,000 5 80 13 2.5 17,500 36%
5200 4275002011 7,001 0.16 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 7,001 5 80 13 2.5 17,502 36%
5201 4275002012 6,999 0.16 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,746 32 80 13 2.5 17,497 253% 5202 4275002019 82,427 1.89 1/2 mile
0000
N Commercial MUBL 3.25 267,889 383 80 151 2.5 206,068 253% 5203 4275002020 14,000 0.32 1/2 mile
0110N Residential R2 29
1 14,000 9 80 26 2.5 34,999 36%
5204 4275003005 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36%
5205 4275003006 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36%
5206 4275003007 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile
0000
N Residential R2 291 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36%
5207 4275003008 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36%
5208 4275003009 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36%
5209 4275003013 11,069 0.25 1/2 mile
0010N Commercial MUBL 3.25 35,973 51 80 20 2.5 27,672 253% 5210 4275003016 44,387 1.02 1/2 mile
0000
N Residential R2 291 44,387 30 80 82 2.5 110,967 36%
5211 4275003017 5,536 0.13 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 5,536 4 80 10 2.5 13,839 36%
5212 4275003900 15,000 0.34 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 15,000 10 80 28 2.5 37,500 36%
5213 4275004004 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36% 5214 4275004005 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile
0010
N Residential R2 291 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36%
5215 4275004006 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36%
5216 4275004007 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36%
5217 4275004008 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36% 5218 4275004009 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile0000
N Residential R2 29
1 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36%
5219 4275004010 5,534 0.13 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 5,534 4 80 10 2.5 13,836 36%
5220 4275004015 2,000 0.05 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 2,000 1 804 2.5 5,000 36%
5221 4275004016 1,700 0.04 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 1,700 1 803 2.5 4,250 36%
5222 4275004017 2,400 0.06 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 2,400 2 804 2.5 6,000 36%
5223 4275004018 2,900 0.07 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 2,900 2 805 2.5 7,250 36%
5224 4275004029 18,930 0.43 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 18,930 13 80 35 2.5 47,325 36%
5225 4275004030 22,539 0.52 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 22,539 15 80 41 2.5 56,347 36% 5226 4275004901 8,065 0.19 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 8,065 5 80 15 2.5 20,161 36%
5228 4275005002 7,002 0.16 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 22,756 33 80 13 2.5 17,505 253% 5235 4275005020 5,553 0.13 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 18,046 26 80 10 2.5 13,882 253% 5507 4275032005 16,036 0.37 1/4 mile
0000N Industrial IC3 48,107 69 100 373 48,107 187%
5514 4275033031 16,032 0.37 1/4 mile0000N Industrial IC 3 48,097 69 100 37
3 48,097 187%
5515 4275033032 33,645 0.77 1/4 mile0
000N Industrial IC3 100,934 144 100 773 100,934 187%
5518 4275033035 2,238 0.05 1/4 mile0000N Industrial IC
3 6,713 10 10053 6,713 187%
5519 4275033036 6,171 0.14 1/4 mile
0000N Industrial IC3 18,514 26 100 143 18,514 187%
5916 4276021003 4,954 0.11 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 4,954
3 809 2.5 12,384 36%
5917 4276021004 4,954 0.11 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 291 4,954 3 809 2.5 12,384 36%
5925 4276021013 90,978 2.09 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 90,978 61 80 167 2.5 227,446 36% 5927 4276022001 5,229 0.12 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 16,994 24 80 10 2.5 13,072 253% 5928 4276022002 5,195 0.12 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 16,882 24 80 10 2.5 12,986 253% 5929 4276022003 5,207 0.12 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 16,922 24 80 10 2.5 13,017 253% 5930 4276022004 5,196 0.12 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 16,886 24 80 10 2.5 12,989 253% 5931 4276022011 5,210 0.12 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 5,210 3 80 10 2.5 13,024 36% 5932 4276022012 5,192 0.12 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 5,192 3 80 10 2.5 12,981 36% 5933 4276022013 2,933 0.07 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 2,933 2 805 2.5 7,333 36% 5950 4276022036 10,415 0.24 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 33,849 48 80 19 2.5 26,038 253% 5951 4276022038 15,427 0.35 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUBL 3.25 50,137 72 80 28 2.5 38,567 253%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
5954 4276022058 5,094 0.12 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 291 5,094 3 80
9 2.5 12,736 36%
5955 4276023900 282,585 6.49 1/2 mile0
0 00Y Institutional PL0 - - 80 519 2.5 706,463 0%
5965 4276024031 4,689 0.11 1/2 mile0
00 0
N Commercial MUBL 3.25 15,240 22 80
9 2.5 11,723 253%
5967 4276024035 14,825 0.34 1/2 mile
0100N Commercial MUBL 3.25 48,180 69 80 27 2.5 37,062 253% 2428 4268013006 58071.23653 1.333132152 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 1.5 87,107 270 80 107 2.5 145,178 253% 2437 4268013026 42785.53493 0.982220729 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 1.5 64,178 199 80 79 2.5 106,964 253% 2427 4268013003 81696.37589 1.875490723 1/4 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3 245,089 379 100 1883 245,089 202%
2429 4268013007 105204.4347 2.415161494 1/4 mile0000N Commercial MUC 3 315,613 488 100 242
3 315,613 202%
2422 4268011013 33029.74723 0.75825866 1/2 mile
000
0N Commercial MUC 1.5 49,545 153 80 61 2.5 82,574 253%
2430 4268013008 23303.60909 0.534977252 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 1.5 34,955 108 80 43 2.5 58,259 253% 2973 4270008001 18876.71339 0.433349711 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUBL 1.5 28,315 88 80 35 2.5 47,192 253% 2431 4268013009 18688.53354 0.429029696 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUC 1.5 28,033 87 80 34 2.5 46,721 253% 2442 4268013904 8373.634434 0.192232195 1/4 mile
0000N Commercial MUC 1.5 12,560 39 100 193 25,121 202%
3012 4270008041 16990.70705 0.390052963 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUBL 1.5 25,486 79 80 31 2.5 42,477 253% 3014 4270009001 14425.71502 0.331168848 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUBL3 43,277 67 80 26 2.5 36,064 253%
3052 4270009042 12537.91314 0.28783088 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUBL3 37,614 58 80 23 2.5 31,345 253% 2928 4270006042 5774.683466 0.132568491 1/2 mile001
0N Commercial NC 1.5 8,662 19 80 11 2.5 14,437 175%
2929 4270006043 5578.751442 0.128070511 1/2 mile
000
0N Commercial NC2 11,158 18 80 10 2.5 13,947 175%
2972 4270007047 41739.61017 0.9582096 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial MUBL
2 83,479 194 80 77 2.5 104,349 253%
2887 4270006001 9896.485374 0.227192043 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC2 19,793 32 80 18 2.5 24,741 175% 5151 4274034031 7502.079578 0.172224049 1/2 mile000
1N Commercial NC3 22,506 24 80 14 2.5 18,755 175%
5169 4274036027 6776.722944 0.155572152 1/2 mile
000
1N Commercial NC1 6,777 22 80 12 2.5 16,942 175%
2888 4270006002 6749.939641 0.154957292 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial NC3 20,250 22 80 12 2.5 16,875 175%
3069 4270010089 79341.79873 1.821437069 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUBL1 79,342 368 80 146 2.5 198,354 253% 3070 4270010090 14754.13793 0.338708401 1/2 mile000
0N Commercial MUBL 3.25 47,951 69 80 27 2.5 36,885 253% 5164 4274036001 6191.756019 0.142143159 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial NC1 6,192 20 80 11 2.5 15,479 175%
2927 4270006041 5957.667704 0.136769231 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial NC
1 5,958 19 80 11 2.5 14,894 175%
5168 4274036026 5330.651515 0.12237492 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 1 5,331 17 80 10 2.5 13,327 175%
5165 4274036002 5015.226488 0.115133758 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 5,015 16 809 2.5 12,538 175% 5118 4274033015 5007.452417 0.11495529 1/2 mile
0011N Commercial NC1 5,007 16 80
9 2.5 12,519 175%
5147 4274034023 5004.830901 0.114895108 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial NC
1 5,005 16 809 2.5 12,512 175%
5126 4274033024 5000.68219 0.114799867 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 1 5,001 16 809 2.5 12,502 175%
5149 4274034028 5000.62877 0.11479864 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 5,001 16 809 2.5 12,502 175% 5119 4274033016 4998.657258 0.114753381 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial NC1 4,999 16 80
9 2.5 12,497 175%
5125 4274033023 4998.49351 0.114749621 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial NC
1 4,998 16 809 2.5 12,496 175%
5123 4274033020 4995.573174 0.11468258 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 1 4,996 16 809 2.5 12,489 175%
5167 4274036007 4338.20361 0.099591451 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 4,338 14 808 2.5 10,846 175% 5136 4274034010 3840.884579 0.088174577 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial NC1 3,841 12 807 2.5 9,602 175%
5138 4274034012 2508.307711 0.057582822 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial NC
1 2,508 8 805 2.5 6,271 175%
5139 4274034013 2508.083383 0.057577672 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 1 2,508 8 805 2.5 6,270 175%
5166 4274036003 2502.011906 0.05743829 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 2,502 8 805 2.5 6,255 175% 5146 4274034022 2501.611676 0.057429102 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 2,502 8 805 2.5 6,254 175%
5137 4274034011 2501.457424 0.057425561 1/2 mile0001
N Commercial NC1 2,501 8 805 2.5 6,254 175%
5141 4274034015 2501.41412 0.057424567 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 2,501 8 805 2.5 6,254 175% 5117 4274033012 2501.327109 0.057422569 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial NC1 2,501 8 805 2.5 6,253 175%
5144 4274034020 2500.941359 0.057413713 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 2,501 8 80 5 2.5 6,252 175%
5145 4274034021 2500.890972 0.057412557 1/2 mile0
001N Commercial NC 1.5 3,751 8 805 2.5 6,252 175%
5143 4274034019 2500.728486 0.057408827 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC 1.5 3,751 8 80 5 2.5 6,252 175%
5142 4274034016 2500.72035 0.05740864 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial NC 1.5 3,751 8 805 2.5 6,252 175%
5140 4274034014 2500.546347 0.057404645 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 2,501 8 80 5 2.5 6,251 175%
5116 4274033009 2500.203817 0.057396782 1/2 mile0
001N Commercial NC 1.5 3,750 8 805 2.5 6,251 175%
5148 4274034027 2499.836672 0.057388353 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 2,500 8 80 5 2.5 6,250 175%
5124 4274033021 2498.844364 0.057365573 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial NC1 2,499 8 805 2.5 6,247 175%
5120 4274033017 2498.496467 0.057357586 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 2,498 8 805 2.5 6,246 175% 5121 4274033018 2497.946689 0.057344965 1/2 mile0
001N Commercial NC1 2,498 8 805 2.5 6,245 175%
5122 4274033019 2496.744047 0.057317356 1/2 mile0011N Commercial NC1 2,497 8 80 5 2.5 6,242 175%
5127 4274033025 2490.260903 0.057168524 1/2 mile
0001N Commercial NC1 2,490 8 805 2.5 6,226 175%
5170 4274036028 1985.147038 0.045572705 1/2 mile0001N Commercial NC1 1,985 6 804 2.5 4,963 175% 9548 4281028010 7482.464045 0.171773738 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 291 7,482 5 80 14 2.5 18,706 36%
9550 4281028012 4998.291454 0.114744983 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 4,998 3 809 2.5 12,496 36% 9554 4281028026 4994.900704 0.114667142 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 4,995 3 809 2.5 12,487 36% 9556 4281028028 4994.414446 0.114655979 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUB 3.25 16,232 23 809 2.5 12,486 253% 9558 4281028034 7507.904157 0.172357763 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 7,508 5 80 14 2.5 18,770 36% 9560 4281028060 10009.7882 0.229793118 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUB 3.25 32,532 46 80 18 2.5 25,024 253% 9561 4281028063 30008.42714 0.688898695 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUB 3.25 97,527 139 80 55 2.5 75,021 253% 9697 4281035002 4995.240421 0.114674941 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 4,995 3 809 2.5 12,488 36% 9698 4281035003 7494.485666 0.172049717 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,494 5 80 14 2.5 18,736 36% 9699 4281035004 7518.164747 0.172593314 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,518 5 80 14 2.5 18,795 36% 9700 4281035005 7477.550361 0.171660936 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,478 5 80 14 2.5 18,694 36%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
9701 4281035007 14997.52021 0.344295689 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R2 291 14,998 10 80 28 2.5 37,494 36%
9702 4281035010 7502.21065 0.172227058 1/2 mile0
0 00N Commercial MUB 3.25 24,382 35 80 14 2.5 18,756 253% 9703 4281035013 7517.851435 0.172586121 1/2 mile0
01 0
N Residential R2 291 7,518 5 80 14 2.5 18,795 36%
9704 4281035014 7477.287603 0.171654904 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 7,477
5 80 14 2.5 18,693 36%
9705 4281035015 7519.328382 0.172620027 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,519
5 80 14 2.5 18,798 36%
9706 4281035016 7492.072985 0.171994329 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,492
5 80 14 2.5 18,730 36%
9707 4281035017 7506.630737 0.172328529 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 7,507 5 80 14 2.5 18,767 36%
9708 4281035019 7516.782171 0.172561574 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 7,517 5 80 14 2.5 18,792 36%
9709 4281035024 7479.333738 0.171701876 1/2 mile
000
0N Commercial MUB 3.25 24,308 35 80 14 2.5 18,698 253%
9710 4281035025 15002.91678 0.344419577 1/2 mile
0100N Commercial MUB 3.25 48,759 70 80 28 2.5 37,507 253% 9711 4281035026 7476.720385 0.171641882 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,477 5 80 14 2.5 18,692 36%
9712 4281035030 7498.785609 0.17214843 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 7,499 5 80 14 2.5 18,747 36% 9713 4281035036 14987.6507 0.344069116 1/2 mile
0100N Residential R2 29
1 14,988 10 80 28 2.5 37,469 36%
9714 4281035040 5003.241984 0.114858631 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 5,003
3 809 2.5 12,508 36%
9715 4281035045 7517.89298 0.172587075 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 29
1 7,518 5 80 14 2.5 18,795 36%
9716 4281035055 7493.949069 0.172037398 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 7,494 5 80 14 2.5 18,735 36% 9717 4281035067 7492.285937 0.171999218 1/2 mile000
0N Residential R2 291 7,492 5 80 14 2.5 18,731 36%
9817 4282007015 7517.164959 0.172570362 1/2 mile
001
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,276
6 80 14 2.5 18,793 44%
9818 4282007016 7489.265675 0.171929882 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,234
6 80 14 2.5 18,723 44%
9819 4282007017 7489.80985 0.171942375 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,235 6 80 14 2.5 18,725 44% 9820 4282007018 7490.842997 0.171966093 1/2 mile001
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,236 6 80 14 2.5 18,727 44%
9821 4282007019 7501.600723 0.172213056 1/2 mile
001
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,252
6 80 14 2.5 18,754 44%
9822 4282007020 7498.866458 0.172150286 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,248
6 80 14 2.5 18,747 44%
9827 4282007032 7477.259909 0.171654268 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,216 6 80 14 2.5 18,693 44%
9828 4282007038 14993.85908 0.344211641 1/2 mile000
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,491 12 80 28 2.5 37,485 44% 9832 4282008002 15001.98456 0.344398176 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,503 12 80 28 2.5 37,505 44% 9833 4282008003 7527.128134 0.172799085 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,291
6 80 14 2.5 18,818 44%
9834 4282008004 7499.471573 0.172164178 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,249 6 80 14 2.5 18,749 44%
9835 4282008005 7516.619929 0.17255785 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,275 6 80 14 2.5 18,792 44% 9836 4282008009 7498.693182 0.172146308 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,248
6 80 14 2.5 18,747 44%
9837 4282008010 4995.440622 0.114679537 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 7,493
4 80
9 2.5 12,489 44%
9838 4282008012 5002.210605 0.114834954 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 7,503 4 809 2.5 12,506 44%
9839 4282008013 7507.210928 0.172341849 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,261 6 80 14 2.5 18,768 44% 9840 4282008014 7496.350151 0.17209252 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,245
6 80 14 2.5 18,741 44%
9841 4282008017 7366.079149 0.169101909 1/2 mile
0110N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,049
6 80 14 2.5 18,415 44%
9842 4282008018 7656.85888 0.175777293 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,485 6 80 14 2.5 19,142 44%
9843 4282008019 7514.417842 0.172507297 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,272 6 80 14 2.5 18,786 44% 9844 4282008023 15013.41848 0.344660663 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,520 12 80 28 2.5 37,534 44% 9845 4282008024 15025.18954 0.344930889 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,538 12 80 28 2.5 37,563 44% 9846 4282008026 4989.363636 0.114540028 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 7,484 4 809 2.5 12,473 44%
9847 4282008031 7511.291733 0.172435531 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,267 6 80 14 2.5 18,778 44% 9848 4282008039 7484.997985 0.17183191 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,227 6 80 14 2.5 18,712 44%
9849 4282008049 14999.05134 0.344330839 1/2 mile0010
N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,499 12 80 28 2.5 37,498 44%
9850 4282008071 15025.83306 0.344945663 1/2 mile0100N Commercial MUB 3.25 48,834 70 80 28 2.5 37,565 253% 9851 4282008072 7486.478235 0.171865892 1/2 mile
0100N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,230 6 80 14 2.5 18,716 44% 9852 4282009005 7492.923076 0.172013845 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,239 6 80 14 2.5 18,732 44% 9853 4282009006 7491.390402 0.171978659 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,237 6 80 14 2.5 18,728 44% 9854 4282009007 15002.18464 0.344402769 1/2 mile0110N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,503 12 80 28 2.5 37,505 44% 9858 4282009017 7500.022825 0.172176833 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial LT3 22,500 32 80 14 2.5 18,750 233%
9859 4282009018 7510.226537 0.172411078 1/2 mile0000N Commercial LT3 22,531 32 80 14 2.5 18,776 233% 9860 4282009024 5000.977764 0.114806652 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial MUB 3.25 16,253 23 809 2.5 12,502 253%
9865 4282009030 9993.620424 0.229421956 1/2 mile0000N Commercial MUB 3.25 32,479 46 80 18 2.5 24,984 253% 9866 4282009032 14994.35718 0.344223076 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,492 12 80 28 2.5 37,486 44% 9867 4282009045 7523.58796 0.172717814 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,285 6 80 14 2.5 18,809 44%
9868 4282009053 37472.69989 0.860254818 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial LT3 112,418 161 80 69 2.5 93,682 233%
9889 4282011003 7510.063861 0.172407343 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,265 6 80 14 2.5 18,775 44%
9902 4282011029 7498.730995 0.172147176 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,248 6 80 14 2.5 18,747 44% 14470 4291001035 24553.31198 0.563666483 1/2 mile0000N Commercial OT3 73,660 105 80 45 2.5 61,383 233% 14471 4291001036 20500.31044 0.47062237 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial BC3 61,501 88 80 38 2.5 51,251 233%
14484 4291002021 4999.818169 0.114780031 1/2 mile0000N Commercial BC3 14,999 21 809 2.5 12,500 233% 14538 4291006001 15000.01458 0.344352952 1/2 mile0000N Commercial NV4 60,000 86 80 28 2.5 37,500 311% 14549 4291007003 7520.288747 0.172642074 1/2 mile0000N Commercial LT3 22,561 32 80 14 2.5 18,801 233% 14550 4291007004 7480.738186 0.171734118 1/2 mile0010N Commercial LT3 22,442 32 80 14 2.5 18,702 233% 14558 4291007025 22492.98164 0.516367806 1/2 mile0000N Commercial LT3 67,479 96 80 41 2.5 56,232 233% 14895 4291032904 2530.030441 0.058081507 1/2 mile0000Y Open Space OS0 - - 805 2.5 6,325 0% 14898 4291032907 125286.8639 2.876190631 1/2 mile0000Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 230 2.5 313,217 0% 14939 4292003027 165227.066 3.793091506 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 247,841 132 80 303 2.5 413,068 44% 14940 4292003028 26743.78097 0.613952731 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 40,116 21 80 49 2.5 66,859 44% 14941 4292004900 191937.9919 4.406289988 1/2 mile1000Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 353 2.5 479,845 0%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
14942 4292005004 7511.076972 0.172430601 1/2 mile1
000N Residential R2 291 7,511 5 80 14 2.5 18,778 36%
14943 4292005005 7496.633221 0.172099018 1/2 mile0
0 10N Residential R2 291 7,497 5 80 14 2.5 18,742 36%
14944 4292005006 7510.146656 0.172409244 1/2 mile0
10 0
N Residential R2 291 7,510 5 80 14 2.5 18,775 36%
14945 4292005007 7496.992555 0.172107267 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 7,497
5 80 14 2.5 18,742 36%
14946 4292005013 7504.586504 0.1722816 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,505
5 80 14 2.5 18,761 36%
14947 4292005015 7524.290864 0.17273395 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,524
5 80 14 2.5 18,811 36%
14948 4292005016 7484.659167 0.171824131 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 7,485 5 80 14 2.5 18,712 36%
14949 4292005018 7484.882019 0.171829247 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 7,485 5 80 14 2.5 18,712 36%
14950 4292005021 5019.439954 0.115230486 1/2 mile
000
0N Residential R2 291 5,019 3 809 2.5 12,549 36%
14951 4292005022 5002.437075 0.114840153 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 5,002
3 809 2.5 12,506 36%
14952 4292005024 5010.304648 0.115020768 1/2 mile00
00N Residential R2 291 5,010 3 80
9 2.5 12,526 36%
14953 4292005027 30027.63039 0.689339541 1/2 mile0100N Residential R2 291 30,028 20 80 55 2.5 75,069 36% 14954 4292005028 15015.00653 0.34469712 1/2 mile001
0N Residential R2 291 15,015 10 80 28 2.5 37,538 36%
14955 4292005030 7497.901435 0.172128132 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 7,498
5 80 14 2.5 18,745 36%
14956 4292005043 7523.930333 0.172725673 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 29
1 7,524 5 80 14 2.5 18,810 36%
14957 4292005047 30026.79172 0.689320287 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 30,027 20 80 55 2.5 75,067 36% 14958 4292005048 15007.04303 0.344514303 1/2 mile010
0N Residential R2 291 15,007 10 80 28 2.5 37,518 36%
14961 4292006005 7489.615912 0.171937923 1/2 mile
001
0N Residential R2 29
1 7,490 5 80 14 2.5 18,724 36%
14962 4292006008 7507.683403 0.172352695 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,508 5 80 14 2.5 18,769 36%
14963 4292006009 7507.201493 0.172341632 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,507 5 80 14 2.5 18,768 36% 14964 4292006010 7503.40334 0.172254438 1/2 mile001
0N Residential R2 291 7,503 5 80 14 2.5 18,759 36%
14965 4292006012 4988.768537 0.114526367 1/2 mile
000
0N Residential R2 29
1 4,989 3 809 2.5 12,472 36%
14966 4292006013 13496.30232 0.309832468 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R2 29
1 13,496 9 80 25 2.5 33,741 36%
14967 4292006017 7508.799439 0.172378316 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 7,509 5 80 14 2.5 18,772 36%
14972 4292006024 16510.25516 0.379023305 1/2 mile001
0N Residential R2 291 16,510 11 80 30 2.5 41,276 36%
14973 4292006025 7513.650076 0.172489671 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,514
5 80 14 2.5 18,784 36%
14974 4292006026 22515.34143 0.516881116 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 22,515 15 80 41 2.5 56,288 36%
14976 4292006050 5006.453741 0.114932363 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 5,006 3 809 2.5 12,516 36%
14977 4292006054 4992.313327 0.114607744 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 4,992 3 809 2.5 12,481 36% 15070 4292011005 7520.376497 0.172644089 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,520 5 80 14 2.5 18,801 36%
15071 4292011006 7480.660108 0.171732326 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,481 5 80 14 2.5 18,702 36%
15072 4292011008 7479.062914 0.171695659 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 7,479 5 80 14 2.5 18,698 36%
15073 4292011012 7483.892742 0.171806537 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,484 5 80 14 2.5 18,710 36% 15074 4292011013 7491.079774 0.171971528 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,491 5 80 14 2.5 18,728 36%
15075 4292011014 7503.889886 0.172265608 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 7,504 5 80 14 2.5 18,760 36%
15076 4292011015 7491.67414 0.171985173 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 7,492 5 80 14 2.5 18,729 36%
15077 4292011018 7493.682095 0.172031269 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,494 5 80 14 2.5 18,734 36% 15080 4292011023 6992.889232 0.160534647 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 6,993 5 80 13 2.5 17,482 36%
15081 4292011026 11269.41782 0.258710235 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 11,269 8 80 21 2.5 28,174 36%
15082 4292011029 14000.06705 0.321397315 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 14,000 9 80 26 2.5 35,000 36%
15083 4292011031 7493.461425 0.172026204 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 7,493 5 80 14 2.5 18,734 36% 15084 4292011036 7505.491555 0.172302377 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 7,505 5 80 14 2.5 18,764 36%
15085 4292011043 7517.573351 0.172579737 1/2 mile0000
N Residential R2 291 7,518 5 80 14 2.5 18,794 36%
15086 4292011049 15018.42884 0.344775685 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 15,018 10 80 28 2.5 37,546 36%
15087 4292011066 11225.30792 0.257697611 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 11,225 7 80 21 2.5 28,063 36%
15088 4292011081 15010.38605 0.344591048 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 15,010 10 80 28 2.5 37,526 36% 15089 4292012001 2506.835652 0.057549028 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R2 291 2,507 2 805 2.5 6,267 36%
15090 4292012002 2507.475865 0.057563725 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 2,507 2 805 2.5 6,269 36%
15091 4292012004 7514.609805 0.172511704 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 7,515 5 80 14 2.5 18,787 36%
15092 4292012005 7482.849036 0.171782577 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,483 5 80 14 2.5 18,707 36% 15093 4292012008 7519.983017 0.172635055 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R2 291 7,520 5 80 14 2.5 18,800 36%
15094 4292012009 7490.517185 0.171958613 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 29 1 7,491 5 80 14 2.5 18,726 36%
15095 4292012010 7500.660616 0.172191474 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 291 7,501 5 80 14 2.5 18,752 36%
15096 4292012011 7495.691956 0.172077409 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 24,361 35 80 14 2.5 18,739 253% 15097 4292012015 7498.955958 0.172152341 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial WT 3.25 24,372 35 80 14 2.5 18,747 253% 15098 4292012018 7491.7367 0.171986609 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 29 1 7,492 5 80 14 2.5 18,729 36%
15099 4292012022 4997.474689 0.114726233 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 4,997 3 809 2.5 12,494 36%
15100 4292012023 15007.1718 0.344517259 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 15,007 10 80 28 2.5 37,518 36% 15101 4292012025 15009.39037 0.34456819 1/2 mile1
000N Commercial WT 3.25 48,781 70 80 28 2.5 37,523 253% 15102 4292012026 14983.1289 0.34396531 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 48,695 70 80 28 2.5 37,458 253% 15103 4292012027 7494.372836 0.172047127 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 24,357 35 80 14 2.5 18,736 253% 15104 4292012028 15002.13295 0.344401583 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 15,002 10 80 28 2.5 37,505 36% 15105 4292012029 22503.31005 0.516604914 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 22,503 15 80 41 2.5 56,258 36% 15106 4292012031 14995.94853 0.344259608 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 48,737 70 80 28 2.5 37,490 253% 15107 4292012048 5001.766705 0.114824764 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 5,002 3 809 2.5 12,504 36% 15108 4292013002 13491.91738 0.309731804 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 13,492 9 80 25 2.5 33,730 36% 15109 4292013004 7490.091513 0.171948841 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,490 5 80 14 2.5 18,725 36% 15110 4292013009 7501.758546 0.172216679 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 24,381 35 80 14 2.5 18,754 253% 15111 4292013010 5002.515801 0.114841961 1/2 mile1000N Commercial WT 3.25 16,258 23 809 2.5 12,506 253%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
15112 4292013011 4997.640153 0.114730031 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial WT 3.25 16,242 23 80
9 2.5 12,494 253%
15113 4292013015 7494.901442 0.172059262 1/2 mile0
0 10N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,242 6 80 14 2.5 18,737 44% 15114 4292013017 5015.301281 0.115135475 1/2 mile0
01 0
N Residential R3 35 1.5 7,523 4 80
9 2.5 12,538 44%
15115 4292013019 4996.490064 0.114703629 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 7,495
4 809 2.5 12,491 44%
15116 4292013020 5013.06684 0.115084179 1/2 mile
0000N Commercial WT 3.25 16,292 23 80
9 2.5 12,533 253%
15117 4292013022 8994.567277 0.206486852 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 29
1 8,995
6 80 17 2.5 22,486 36%
15118 4292013025 5001.37508 0.114815773 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 7,502 4 809 2.5 12,503 44%
15119 4292013029 67482.4491 1.549183864 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 101,224 54 80 124 2.5 168,706 44% 15120 4292013030 7501.270434 0.172205474 1/2 mile
011
0N Residential R2 291 7,501 5 80 14 2.5 18,753 36%
15121 4292013031 29994.32424 0.688574937 1/2 mile
0100N Residential R2 291 29,994 20 80 55 2.5 74,986 36% 15123 4292014002 7495.614042 0.172075621 1/2 mile00
10N Residential R2 291 7,496 5 80 14 2.5 18,739 36%
15124 4292014003 7508.666342 0.17237526 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,509 5 80 14 2.5 18,772 36% 15125 4292014004 7494.513207 0.172050349 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 7,495 5 80 14 2.5 18,736 36%
15126 4292014006 7496.005276 0.172084602 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R2 291 7,496
5 80 14 2.5 18,740 36%
15127 4292014007 7520.022142 0.172635954 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R2 29
1 7,520 5 80 14 2.5 18,800 36%
15128 4292014008 7482.893003 0.171783586 1/2 mile0010N Residential R2 291 7,483 5 80 14 2.5 18,707 36% 15129 4292014010 7493.512131 0.172027368 1/2 mile000
0N Residential R2 291 7,494 5 80 14 2.5 18,734 36%
15130 4292014011 5008.608171 0.114981822 1/2 mile
000
0N Residential R2 29
1 5,009 3 809 2.5 12,522 36%
15131 4292014013 7514.874387 0.172517777 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,272
6 80 14 2.5 18,787 44%
15132 4292014014 7516.625793 0.172557984 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,275 6 80 14 2.5 18,792 44% 15133 4292014015 7500.772496 0.172194043 1/2 mile001
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,251 6 80 14 2.5 18,752 44%
15134 4292014016 7525.361935 0.172758538 1/2 mile
001
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,288
6 80 14 2.5 18,813 44%
15135 4292014017 7485.037819 0.171832824 1/2 mile0
100N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,228
6 80 14 2.5 18,713 44%
15136 4292014018 7523.923194 0.17272551 1/2 mile0110N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,286 6 80 14 2.5 18,810 44%
15137 4292014027 22507.78194 0.516707574 1/2 mile001
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 33,762 18 80 41 2.5 56,269 44% 15138 4292014029 7510.925254 0.172427118 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 7,511
5 80 14 2.5 18,777 36%
15139 4292014044 7522.949188 0.172703149 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 7,523 5 80 14 2.5 18,807 36%
15140 4292014051 9899.488514 0.227260985 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 14,849 8 80 18 2.5 24,749 44%
15141 4292014060 4748.479992 0.109010101 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 4,748 3 809 2.5 11,871 36% 15142 4292014063 5237.849231 0.120244473 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 5,238 3 80 10 2.5 13,095 36%
15143 4292014066 12609.78544 0.289480841 1/2 mile
0110N Residential R3 35 1.5 18,915 10 80 23 2.5 31,524 44% 15221 4292019006 7494.388385 0.172047484 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,242 6 80 14 2.5 18,736 44%
15222 4292019012 7495.548586 0.172074118 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,243 6 80 14 2.5 18,739 44% 15223 4292019013 15002.2543 0.344404369 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,503 12 80 28 2.5 37,506 44% 15224 4292019014 18766.12088 0.430810856 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 28,149 15 80 34 2.5 46,915 44% 15225 4292019015 18747.58823 0.430385405 1/2 mile1000N Residential R3 35 1.5 28,121 15 80 34 2.5 46,869 44% 15226 4292019016 15015.83466 0.344716131 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,524 12 80 28 2.5 37,540 44% 15227 4292019017 15007.17377 0.344517304 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,511 12 80 28 2.5 37,518 44% 15228 4292019018 15007.24271 0.344518887 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,511 12 80 28 2.5 37,518 44% 15230 4292019030 7491.930091 0.171991049 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,238 6 80 14 2.5 18,730 44%
15231 4292019036 30024.89001 0.68927663 1/2 mile0100N Residential R3 35 1.5 45,037 24 80 55 2.5 75,062 44% 15232 4292019079 7505.626641 0.172305478 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,258 6 80 14 2.5 18,764 44%
15233 4292019091 14999.2439 0.344335259 1/2 mile0100
N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,499 12 80 28 2.5 37,498 44%
15234 4292020001 9994.086579 0.229432658 1/2 mile1010N Residential R3 35 1.5 14,991 8 80 18 2.5 24,985 44%
15235 4292020002 7493.874081 0.172035677 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,241 6 80 14 2.5 18,735 44% 15236 4292020003 7502.853588 0.172241818 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 24,384 35 80 14 2.5 18,757 253% 15237 4292020004 4986.62016 0.114477047 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial WT 3.25 16,207 23 809 2.5 12,467 253%
15238 4292020005 7477.063196 0.171649752 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 24,300 35 80 14 2.5 18,693 253% 15239 4292020006 7517.168019 0.172570432 1/2 mile
0010N Commercial WT 3.25 24,431 35 80 14 2.5 18,793 253% 15240 4292020007 7491.719195 0.171986207 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,238 6 80 14 2.5 18,729 44% 15241 4292020008 7493.378757 0.172024306 1/2 mile0
100N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,240 6 80 14 2.5 18,733 44% 15242 4292020009 5008.07981 0.114969693 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 7,512 4 809 2.5 12,520 44%
15243 4292020010 22510.58202 0.516771855 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 33,766 18 80 41 2.5 56,276 44% 15244 4292020011 15017.41081 0.344752314 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 48,807 70 80 28 2.5 37,544 253% 15245 4292020012 10017.58887 0.229972196 1/2 mile1
000N Commercial WT 3.25 32,557 47 80 18 2.5 25,044 253% 15246 4292020013 22503.468 0.51660854 1/2 mile0100N Residential R3 35 1.5 33,755 18 80 41 2.5 56,259 44% 15247 4292020014 31304.94691 0.718662693 1/2 mile
0100N Residential R3 35 1.5 46,957 25 80 57 2.5 78,262 44% 15248 4292020902 45040.6868 1.033991892 1/2 mile0100N Residential R3 35 1.5 67,561 36 80 83 2.5 112,602 44% 15249 4292021008 29986.0509 0.688385007 1/2 mile0
000N Commercial WT 3.25 97,455 139 80 55 2.5 74,965 253% 15250 4292021009 7489.945191 0.171945482 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 24,342 35 80 14 2.5 18,725 253% 15251 4292021010 7517.148976 0.172569995 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 24,431 35 80 14 2.5 18,793 253% 15252 4292021014 7494.93763 0.172060093 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,242 6 80 14 2.5 18,737 44% 15253 4292021015 22496.91347 0.516458069 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 33,745 18 80 41 2.5 56,242 44% 15254 4292021019 15003.09544 0.344423679 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 48,760 70 80 28 2.5 37,508 253% 15255 4292021020 7497.812874 0.172126099 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,247 6 80 14 2.5 18,745 44% 15256 4292021021 14994.63645 0.344229487 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 48,733 70 80 28 2.5 37,487 253% 15257 4292021022 37542.35067 0.86185378 1/2 mile0000N Commercial WT 3.25 122,013 174 80 69 2.5 93,856 253% 15258 4292021024 30006.88165 0.688863215 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 45,010 24 80 55 2.5 75,017 44% 15260 4292022004 7488.421118 0.171910494 1/2 mile0100N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,233 6 80 14 2.5 18,721 44%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Parcel ID APN Parcel Size
(SF)
Parcel Size
(Acre)
TOD
Distance
Landmark
(1,0)
Affordable
Housing (1,0)
SB 79 Rent
Control (3+)
(1,0)
Pico (1,0) SB 79 Exempt Parcel Type Zoning Local Density (du/acre)
Local FAR Local Floor
Area (SF)
Local Max
Units
SB 79
Density
(du/acre)
SB 79 Max
Units
SB 79 FAR SB 79 Floor
Area (SF)
Site Capacity
(% of SB 79)
15261 4292022005 7526.014419 0.172773517 1/2 mile0
010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,289 6 80 14 2.5 18,815 44% 15262 4292022007 15025.45265 0.344936929 1/2 mile0
0 10N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,538 12 80 28 2.5 37,564 44% 15263 4292022009 5016.02759 0.115152149 1/2 mile0
00 0
N Residential R3 35 1.5 7,524 4 80
9 2.5 12,540 44%
15264 4292022010 4993.14872 0.114626922 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 7,490
4 809 2.5 12,483 44%
15265 4292022013 7484.721557 0.171825564 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,227
6 80 14 2.5 18,712 44%
15266 4292022015 7497.345533 0.17211537 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,246
6 80 14 2.5 18,743 44%
15267 4292022016 11241.25641 0.258063738 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 16,862 9 80 21 2.5 28,103 44%
15268 4292022017 11282.91524 0.259020093 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 16,924 9 80 21 2.5 28,207 44%
15271 4292022024 7498.742634 0.172147443 1/2 mile
000
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,248 6 80 14 2.5 18,747 44%
15272 4292022041 15014.24021 0.344679527 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,521 12 80 28 2.5 37,536 44% 15273 4292022044 7523.880618 0.172724532 1/2 mile00
00N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,286 6 80 14 2.5 18,810 44% 15274 4292022050 15020.67493 0.344827248 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,531 12 80 28 2.5 37,552 44% 15275 4292022071 7505.594258 0.172304735 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,258
6 80 14 2.5 18,764 44%
15276 4292022078 7486.815178 0.171873627 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,230
6 80 14 2.5 18,717 44%
15277 4292022082 5022.733905 0.115306104 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R3 35 1.5 7,534
4 809 2.5 12,557 44%
15342 4292027006 7493.503913 0.172027179 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,240 6 80 14 2.5 18,734 44% 15343 4292027007 7508.64093 0.172374677 1/2 mile001
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,263 6 80 14 2.5 18,772 44%
15344 4292027008 7509.171616 0.17238686 1/2 mile
001
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,264
6 80 14 2.5 18,773 44%
15345 4292027009 7494.901289 0.172059258 1/2 mile
0110N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,242
6 80 14 2.5 18,737 44%
15346 4292027010 7493.487869 0.172026811 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,240 6 80 14 2.5 18,734 44% 15347 4292027011 11260.53365 0.258506282 1/2 mile001
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 16,891 9 80 21 2.5 28,151 44%
15349 4292027019 22500.90781 0.516549766 1/2 mile
001
0N Residential R3 35 1.5 33,751 18 80 41 2.5 56,252 44% 15351 4292027023 18745.4677 0.430336724 1/2 mile0
000N Residential R3 35 1.5 28,118 15 80 34 2.5 46,864 44% 15353 4292027134 14985.5484 0.344020854 1/2 mile0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,478 12 80 28 2.5 37,464 44% 15356 4292028001 190963.0344 4.383908043 1/2 mile100
0N Commercial OT3 572,889 818 80 351 2.5 477,408 233%
15357 4292029901 238687.6932 5.479515454 1/2 mile
0000Y Open Space OS0
- - 80 438 2.5 596,719 0%
15358 4292029902 106009.3492 2.433639788 1/2 mile
0000Y Open Space OS
0 - - 80 195 2.5 265,023 0%
15386 4292032900 176416.2179 4.04995909 1/2 mile0000Y Open Space OS 0 - - 80 324 2.5 441,041 0%
15387 4292032901 13189.18796 0.302782093 1/2 mile0000Y Open Space OS0 - - 80 24 2.5 32,973 0% 15259 4292022001 15024.00371 0.344903666 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,536 12 80 28 2.5 37,560 44% 15269 4292022019 11254.10316 0.258358658 1/2 mile
0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 16,881
9 80 21 2.5 28,135 44%
15348 4292027016 7486.052707 0.171856123 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,229 6 80 14 2.5 18,715 44%
15350 4292027021 15006.14696 0.344493732 1/2 mile0010N Residential R3 35 1.5 22,509 12 80 28 2.5 37,515 44% 15352 4292027116 22475.02405 0.515955557 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 33,713 18 80 41 2.5 56,188 44% 15354 4292027151 7507.364697 0.172345379 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,261
6 80 14 2.5 18,768 44%
15355 4292027158 7509.790703 0.172401072 1/2 mile1000N Residential R3 35 1.5 11,265 6 80 14 2.5 18,774 44%
15367 4292031001 5647.866237 0.129657168 1/2 mile0000N Residential R2 291 5,648 4 80 10 2.5 14,120 36% 15381 4292031900 20034.14651 0.459920719 1/2 mile
0000N Residential R2 29
1 20,034 13 80 37 2.5 50,085 36%
15385 4292032001 11503.17338 0.264076524 1/2 mile
0000Y Open Space OS
0 - - 80 21 2.5 28,758 0%

12.B.c
Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Inventory of Sites Eligible for Temp Exclusion (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance 1 City Council Meeting: July 14, 2026 Santa Monica, California ORDINANCE NUMBER _______ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY COUNCIL TO AMEND THE

TEXT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN SITES FROM SENATE BILL (SB) 79 IMPLEMENTATION UNTIL ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF THE 7TH CYCLE (2029-2037) HOUSING ELEMENT AND TO INCREASE

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PARCELS ZONED MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL

THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE-HALF MILE OF THE METRO E EXPO/BUNDY

STATION
WHEREAS, California faces a housing shortage both acute and chronic, particularly in areas with access to robust public transit infrastructure; and WHEREAS, building more homes near transit access reduces housing and transportation costs for California families, and promotes environmental sustainability, economic growth, and reduced traffic congestion; and
WHEREAS, public transit systems require sustainable funding to provide reliable service, especially in areas experiencing increased density and ridership; and WHEREAS, the state does not invest in public transit service to the same degree as it does in roads, and the state funds a smaller proportion of the state’s major transit agencies’ operations costs than other states with comparable systems; and WHEREAS, transit systems in other countries derive significant revenue from transit-oriented development at and near their stations; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2025, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill 79 (“SB 79”), the Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act, which became effective on July 1, 2026; and

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 2 WHEREAS, in adopting SB 79, the Legislature made findings and declarations, including that the State faces a housing crisis of availability and affordability, in large part due to a severe shortage of housing, and solving the housing crisis therefore requires a multifaceted, statewide approach, including, but not limited to, encouraging an increase in the overall supply of housing, encouraging the development of housing that is affordable to households at all income levels, removing barriers to housing production, expanding homeownership opportunities, and expanding the availability of rental housing; and
WHEREAS, SB 79 requires cities to permit, as an allowable use, housing development projects that meet applicable standards and are located within a half mile distance of a major transit stop, as defined, on any site zoned for residential, mixed use, or commercial development; and
WHEREAS, SB 79 further provides guaranteed height, density, and FAR standards for eligible housing projects near Transit-Oriented Development (“TOD”) stops and additional concessions beyond State Density Bonus Law; and WHEREAS, although SB 79 has certain mandated requirements, it provides flexibility and a measure of local control to jurisdictions with respect to its implementation; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a study session wherein staff presented an overview of SB 79 including its impact on Santa Monica and three implementation options permitted under SB 79: 1) implementation of SB 79 on July 1, 2026; 2) a temporary exclusion of certain sites in transit-oriented zones,

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 3 as defined, until 2030, one year after adoption of the City’s 7th Cycle (2029-2037) Housing Element; and 3) adoption of a TOD Alternative Plan; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the study session, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend that City Council direct staff to pursue adoption of an ordinance to temporarily exclude sites to allow time to adopt a TOD Alternative Plan; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 2026, the City Council conducted a study session to review the same implementation options for SB 79, including the Planning Commission’s April 15, 2026 recommendations to the Council, and directed staff to proceed with adopting a temporary exclusion ordinance until such time a TOD Alternative plan could be implemented; and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2026, in accordance with Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.46.030(A), the City Council further adopted a Resolution of Intention, Resolution Number 11755 (CCS), declaring its intention to direct the Planning Commission to initiate the process of amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance to effectuate the requirements of Senate Bill 79; and
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing, and after considering all oral and written testimony, adopted Resolution Number 26-008 (PCS), recommending to the City Council that the City Council amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance to exclude certain sites from Senate Bill (SB) 79 implementation until 2030, one year following the adoption of the 7th Cycle Housing Element, and to increase development standards for targeted parcels in the multi-unit residential zoning districts within one-half mile of the Metro E Expo/Bundy station, based on the findings set forth therein; and

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 4 WHEREAS, adoption of an ordinance that temporarily excludes certain sites from SB 79 implementation will, among other things, ensure that the City’s local implementation of SB 79 does not conflict with local land use initiatives and environmental concerns; and
WHEREAS, until such an ordinance is adopted, the City is prohibited from imposing certain height, density, and floor area ratio limits for eligible housing projects located within a half mile of a TOD stop; and
WHEREAS, implementing temporary exclusions to delay implementation of increased development standards mandated by SB 79 to one year after adoption of the 7th Cycle Housing Element will protect the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2026, as required by SB 79, the Southern California Association of Governments (“SCAG”), as the region’s metropolitan planning organization, published a draft map of designated TOD stops and zones on-line for initial public review; and
WHEREAS, on July 2, 2026, the Regional Council of Governments adopted SCAG’s proposed map, with revisions; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted modeling analyses based on SCAG map to evaluate sites within the City that are eligible for temporary exclusion pursuant to the criteria in Government Code Section 65912.161(b)(1); and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to temporarily exclude sites: (1) that permit density and residential floor area ratios at no less than 50 percent of SB 79’s minimum standards; (2) with designated historic resources; and (3) located in a transit-oriented development zone in which at least 33 percent of sites have permitted density and

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 5 residential floor area ratio no less than 50 percent of the standards specified in SB 79 and which includes sites with densities that cumulatively allow for at least 75 percent of the aggregate density for the transit-oriented development zone, as specified; and WHEREAS, the City has and will continue to comply with SB 79’s purpose and intent, including, without limitation, building more homes near transit access, promoting environmental sustainability, economic growth, reducing traffic congestion, and Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing; and
WHEREAS, the additional time provided with adoption of the exclusion ordinance, will allow the City to make more informed, long-term land use decisions pending completion of a TOD Alternative Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance to exclude sites from SB 79 implementation until one year following the adoption of the 7th Cycle Housing Element and to increase development standards for targeted parcels in the Multi-Unit Residential zoning districts within one-half mile of the Metro E Expo/Bundy station.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. City Council hereby amends the text of the Zoning Ordinance related to projects meeting the temporary exclusionary requirements pursuant to SB 79. In amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council hereby finds and declares that, for the reasons articulated above, and in the staff report dated July 14, 2026:

1. The amendments to the text of the Zoning Ordinance are consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan in that the

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 6 amendments are required to implement an Exclusion Ordinance pursuant to SB 79 and are otherwise consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan by helping to meet local housing goals and to facilitate more diverse housing choices in the City’s highest opportunity areas.

2. The amendments are consistent with the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance to promote the growth of the City in an orderly manner and to promote and protect the public health, safety, and general welfare in that the amendments are necessary to implement State law pertaining to SB 79 on qualifying parcels in order to help meet local housing goals and to facilitate more diverse housing choices in the City’s highest opportunity areas.

SECTION 2. Chapter 9.06, Transit-Oriented Development Zones, is hereby added to Division 2, Article 9 Planning and Zoning of the Santa Monica Municipal Code and shall read as follows:

Chapter 9.06 Transit-Oriented Development Zones

9.06.010 Purpose
This Chapter, in accordance with Government Code Section 65912.160(e), exempts certain qualifying sites from the provisions of Senate Bill 79, the “Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act” (codified in California Government Code Sections 65912.155 through 65912.162), until one year following the adoption of the 7th Cycle (2029-2037) Housing Element of the City’s General Plan.

9.06.020 Exclusion of Eligible Sites from Increased Development Standards

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 7 In accordance with Government Code Section 65912.161(b)(1), a parcel meeting any one of the following criteria shall be excluded from the provisions of Government Code Section 65912.157 until one year following the adoption of the 7th Cycle (2029-2037) Housing Element:
(A) A parcel, as identified on the City’s Official Zoning Districting map, that permits density and residential floor area ratio at no less than 50 percent of the standards specified under subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 65912.157. (B) A parcel in a transit-oriented development zone, as defined by Government Code Section 65912.156(m), in which:
(1) At least 33 percent of sites in the relevant transit-oriented development zone have permitted density and residential floor area ratio no less than 50 percent of the standards specified under subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 65912.157; and (2) Includes sites with densities that cumulatively allow for at least 75 percent of the aggregate density for the transit-oriented development zone specified under subdivision (a) of Section 65912.157.
(C) A parcel with a Landmark, as defined by Section 9.56.030(j), designated as of January 1, 2025.

9.06.030 Development Standards for Multi-Unit Residentially Zoned Parcels within One-Half Mile of the Expo/Bundy Metro E Station
Table 9.06.030 prescribes the maximum density and maximum floor area ratios for housing projects located on parcels zoned Multi-Unit Residential and located within onehalf mile of the Expo/Bundy Metro E Station. Standards set forth in Table 9.06.030 shall remain in effect until adoption of a Transit Oriented Development Alternative Plan,

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 8 meeting the requirements of Government Code Section 65912.158. Standards set forth in Table 9.06.030 shall remain in effect until adoption of a Transit Oriented Development Alternative Plan, meeting the requirements of Government Code Section 65912.158.

Standards set forth in Section 9.08.030 that do not conflict with the provisions of this Table

9.06.030 shall apply.

TABLE 9.06.030: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
FOR HOUSING PROJECTS—MULTI-UNIT

RESIDENTIAL PARCELS WITHIN ONE-HALF

MILE OF EXPO/BUNDY METRO E STATION
Parcel and Density Standards
R2 R3
Maximum Allowable
Density
Housing Projects 1 unit per
1,080 sq. ft.
of parcel
area
1 unit per
1,080 sq. ft.
of parcel
area
Building Form and Location
Maximum FAR
Housing Projects 1.25 1.5

9.06.040 Director Authority
The Director, or designee, may issue and update maps identifying eligible sites meeting the criteria for temporary exclusion as set forth in Section 9.06.020 and Government Code Section 65912.161(b)(1), to ensure consistency with the transit-oriented development stops and zones map published by the Southern California Association of Governments pursuant to Government Code Section 65912.160(f).

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 9 SECTION 3. Table 9.080.030 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

TABLE 9.08.030: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS—MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL

DISTRICTS
Standard
*For development standards
within specified areas, see
Section 9.08.030(A)
R2* R3* R4 Additional
Regulations
Housing Projects 1 unit per
1,500 sq.
ft. of
parcel
area
1 unit per
1,250 sq.
ft. of parcel
area
1 unit per
900 sq. ft.
of parcel
area
For parcels
consolidated to
provide courtyards, the
maximum allowable
number of units shall
be based on the total
maximum number of
units allowed on each
of the parcels prior to
consolidation.

For projects eligible for
density bonus, see
Section 9.22.050(C),
Calculating Base
Density.

For parcels located
within one-half mile of
the Expo/Bundy Metro
E Station, see Table

9.06.030, in Chapter

9.06, Transit-Oriented
Development Zones.

Building Form and Location
Maximum Number of Stories
Housing Projects N/A N/A N/A
Tier 1 Non-Housing
Projects—Base Standard
2 2 3
Tier 2 Non-Housing
Projects—With Provision of
Community Benefits
NA 3 4 Chapter 9.23,
Community Benefits
Maximum Building Height
(ft.)
Section 9.04.050,
Measuring Height
Housing Projects 30.

See(B)

40. See(B)

45. See(B)
Tier 1 Non-Housing
Projects—Base Standard

30. See(B)

30. See
(B)

30. See(B)

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 10 Tier 2 Non-Housing
Projects—With Provision of
Community Benefits
NA 40.

See(B)

45. See(B)
Chapter 9.23,
Community Benefits
Maximum FAR Section 9.04.100,
Determining Floor
Area Ratio in
Residential Zoning
Districts
Housing Projects 1.0 1.5 2.0 For projects with a base
density consisting of 8
to 10 units, an increase
in floor area shall be
permitted as necessary
to ensure an FAR of

1.25. For parcels located
within one-half mile of
the Expo/Bundy Metro
E Station, see Table

9.06.030 in Chapter

9.06, Transit Oriented
Development Zones.

Tier 1 Non-Housing
Projects—Base Standard

1.0 1.0 1.5
Tier 2 Non-Housing
Projects—With Provision of
Community Benefits
NA 1.5 2.0 Chapter 9.23,
Community Benefits
Minimum Setbacks
Front (ft.) 20
See(C)(E)
20 See(C)(E)
20 See(C)(E)
Interior Side (ft.)—Parcels
50 feet or more in width
8 See(E) 8 See(E) 8 See(E) • Setbacks shall be 4
feet for ownership
projects that: (1) were
deemed complete on or
after July 1, 2024; (2)
contain 10 or fewer
units; and (3) meet the
requirements of
Government Code
Section 66499.41.
• Setbacks shall be 4
feet for rental
projects that: (1) were
deemed complete on
or after July 1, 2024;
(2) contain 10 or
fewer units; and (3)
result in at least one

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 11 new dwelling unit
(excluding ADUs).

SECTION 4. Any provision of the Santa Monica Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. //
//
//
//
//

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 12 SECTION 6. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper within 15 days after its adoption. This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days from its adoption.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________

HEIDI VON TONGELN

CITY ATTORNEY

12.B.d
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: CDD-ORD-SB 79 Deferral 07.14.2026 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) Community Development Department
City Planning Division
1685 Main Street – Mail Stop 28
Santa Monica, CA 90401
June 10, 2026
Southern California Association of Governments
900 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Sent via email: [email protected]
RE: SCAG SB 79 Transit-Oriented Development Stops, Zones, and Tiers Draft Map Dear SCAG Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments regarding SCAG’s Senate Bill (SB) 79 draft map published on June 1, 2026. After review of the draft map, the City requests corrections to the map based on the City’s understanding of SB 79, local data related to transit and bus operations, and ongoing discussions with SCAG Staff.

I. Revise GTFS Pedestrian Access Points
Per SCAG’s Mapping and Approach and Methodology published in May 2026, SB 79 requires that the distance of a transit-oriented housing development project from a TOD stop be measured from the nearest edge of the parcel containing the proposed project to a pedestrian access point for the TOD stop and that MPOs may rely on the General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) data to map pedestrian access points. Furthermore, a pedestrian access point is the primary location where pedestrians enter a transit station or boarding platform.

The current draft map uses the correct GTFS data locations for pedestrian access points for the four Metro stations with SB 79 qualifying TOD stop boundaries within the City of Santa Monica; however, the draft map also includes among these points the center of platform GTFS data point, which is not a pedestrian access point as defined by SCAG and therefore should be excluded.

The example above shows the 17th Street / SMC Station center of platform GTFS data point (highlighted in the middle) currently included on SCAG’s SB79 draft map.

12.B.e
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: Attachment B - SM_SCAG_Letter_6.11.26 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79)

II. Add TOD Bus Stops: 1) Santa Monica Blvd & 3rd St and 2) Santa Monica Blvd & 4th St and 3) Broadway & Ocean Ave
Per SCAG’s Mapping and Approach and Methodology, qualifying TOD bus stops must meet several criteria. The first requirement of a qualifying stop is that it meet the definition of a major transit stop, which as defined by Public Resources Code 21065.43, is “a site containing any of the following:
a) An existing rail or bus rapid transit station.
b) A ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service. c) The intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

Next, a bus stop must be adjacent to a full-time dedicated bus lane. In Santa Monica, full-time dedicated bus transit lanes are codified in Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 3.12.675(a) and include:

1. Santa Monica Boulevard between Ocean Avenue and 5th Street has a full-time dedicated bus lane on the south side only (eastbound).

2. Broadway between Ocean Avenue and 5th Street has a full-time dedicated bus lane on the north side only (westbound).

The last requirement for a qualifying stop, as indicated in SCAG’s SB 79 Methodology documentation, is that the bus stop has service frequencies of 15 minutes or less during the combined morning and afternoon peak commute periods. In Santa Monica, the bus routes that operate with service intervals of 15 minutes or less include:
• Big Blue Bus 1;
• Big Blue Bus 3;
• Big Blue Bus 7;
• Metro 4;
• Metro 33;and
• Metro 720.

There are three bus stops in Santa Monica that meet all three requirements described above. These include 1) Santa Monica Boulevard and 3rd Street, 2) Santa Monica Boulevard and 4th Street, and 3) Broadway and Ocean Avenue as demonstrated below:

1. Santa Monica Boulevard and 3rd Street
a. At the intersection of two or more major bus routes (Metro Line 4 and Metro Line 33) with a frequency of service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.
b. Adjacent to the full-time dedicated bus lane on Santa Monica Boulevard between Ocean Avenue and 5th Street.
c. Serviced by bus routes with operating intervals of 15 minutes or less, including Metro Line 4.

12.B.e
Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Attachment B - SM_SCAG_Letter_6.11.26 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79)

2. Santa Monica Boulevard and 4th Street
a. At the intersection of two or more major bus routes (Big Blue Bus Routes 2 & 3, Big Blue Bus Routes 1 & 7, and Metro Line 4) with a frequency of service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. b. Adjacent to the full-time dedicated bus lane on Santa Monica Boulevard between Ocean Avenue and 5th Street.
c. Serviced by bus routes with operating intervals of 15 minutes or less, including Big Blue Bus Routes 1 and 7, and Metro Line 4.

3. Broadway and Ocean Avenue
a. At the intersection of two or more major bus routes (Metro Line 4 and Metro Line 33) with a frequency of service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.
b. Adjacent to the full-time dedicated bus lane on Broadway between Ocean Avenue and 5th Street.
c. Serviced by Metro Line 4 bus route with operating intervals of 15 minutes or less.

TOD bus stops to be added: 1) Santa Monica Blvd and 3rd St, 2) Santa Monica Blvd and 4th St, and 3) Broadway and Ocean Ave III. Remove TOD Bus Stop at Pico Blvd & Lincoln Blvd
The current draft map includes a bus stop located near the intersection of Pico Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard; however, this stop does not meet all the criteria of a qualifying bus service TOD stop as described above.

The bus stop at Pico Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard is adjacent to a bus lane located along Lincoln Boulevard, but the bus lane is not a full-time dedicated lane and is only operational during peak Santa Monica Blvd
& 4th St TOD Stop
Santa Monica Blvd
& 3rd St TOD Stop
Broadway and
Ocean Ave

12.B.e
Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: Attachment B - SM_SCAG_Letter_6.11.26 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79)

afternoon commute hours. For this reason, the City requests that the currently mapped TOD bus stop at Pico Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard be removed from the map.

Bus stop at Pico Blvd & Lincoln Blvd to be removed from SCAG’s SB79 draft map We appreciate SCAG’s efforts to produce a final SB 79 map and welcome any opportunities to connect and discuss. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Rachel Kwok
Environmental Planner

12.B.e
Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: Attachment B - SM_SCAG_Letter_6.11.26 (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 1 David Yakobson
From: Kevin McKeown <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 9:53 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Oliver Chi; Jing Yeo
Subject: Item 12-B — Follow-up

EXTERNAL
Feedback from a Councilmember convinces me my original letter, below, was insufficiently clear about the immediacy of my concern. I apologize.

I urge you to make sure vulnerable renters are protected not only under the eventual local TOD plan, but RIGHT NOW when you introduce limited up-zoning for our section of the Expo/Bundy station catchment, so that the eastern Pico neighborhood qualifies for a thoughtful future local TOD plan without endangering renters.

The staff recommendation would have you up-zone R-2 and R-3 parcels, but what might that mean for properties where the upzoning itself induces building owners to demolish and replace with a denser, more profitable building? That involuntary dislocation of renters due to the immediate upzoning, not due to the eventual local TOD plan, is what concerns me right now. I hope to convince you to share my concern.

Apparently staff has done enough surveying of the affected Pico multi-family properties to predict that only two parcels will fail to be exempt under SB79/our local TOD. The renters who live on those parcels need our immediate attention, support, and protection.

Not identified so far is the number of parcels, some of which may have enough rental/low income units for SB79 exemption, which will be tipped over into demolition/redevelopment profitability by the immediate upzoning alone.

Our neighbor renters on those parcels could find themselves on the sidewalk long before we craft our local TOD plan. Oops.

Still, you need to up-zone enough parcels to make up for the City of L.A.’s failure to zone appropriately in their other 75% of the area around the Expo/Bundy station. To make up for whatever number of R-2 and R-3 parcels must be removed from the upzoning to protect renters from displacement, I’m suggesting a hybrid solution.

If you need five more parcels to meet the statutory threshold, there are five R-1 parcels along Centinela Avenue, already a traffic thoroughfare rather than a quiet residential street.

If you need fifteen more parcels, there are fifteen R-1 parcels that lie entirely within the quarter-mile radius of the Expo/Bundy station. Certainly those properties, within easy walking distance of light rail, make greater sense for upzoning in the intended spirit of SB79 than more distant multi-family parcels where existing renters, our neighbors, might be evicted.

Upzoning a few R-1 parcels avoids involuntary displacement. The home-owners of those properties get to make a choice about their own future. Renters on multi-family parcels do not enjoy that choice.

Our community, again and again, has made difficult decisions to ensure our neighbors don’t get forced out of their homes and out of their community. I ask that you again take extraordinary measures to protect vulnerable renters from involuntary dislocation.

Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 2 Thanks,
Kevin
> On Jul 12, 2026, at 10:53 AM, Kevin McKeown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Kevin McKeown <[email protected]>
> Subject: Item 12-B — Protect Pico renters!
> Date: July 12, 2026 at 10:48:07 AM PDT
> To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]> >
> I implore you to keep in mind one overriding imperative as you re-zone part of the Pico neighborhood to give SB79 relief near L.A.’s Expo/Bundy light rail station:
>
> Under no circumstances should any existing Santa Monica residents be forced out of their homes! >
> Please analyze carefully which multi-family parcels might be subject to immediate development pressure if you up-zone them. That development, for a renter household, is likely to mean displacement and an inability to remain part of our Santa Monica community.
>
> While up-zoning R-1 lots may raise concerns about “neighborhood character,” a single-family homeowner remains in control of their own property and does not face involuntary displacement. >
> Are there more nuanced options than re-zoning R-1 vs. re-zoning R-2 and R-3? You may not have to settle for an either/or in accommodating L.A.’s failure to zone appropriately around mass transit, as Santa Monica has done. >
> You could up-zone only those multi-family parcels where the economics are such that no renters will be displaced, and up-zone enough R-1s (with no displacement) to meet the statutory thresholds to defer more drastic impacts on the Pico neighborhood.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin McKeown
> retired former Mayor
————————————
K e v i n M c K e o w n
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mckeown.net__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!oeScWf2pPbBW48KOvHh3PNyI4waMr7XEP1Bq5m9JPIkIbtjmz8iO0rgyxZL2aqFANrrN-sWhQWlgnx4lLFxnSO-Ezs$ Choose to be conscious
————————————
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 1 David Yakobson
From: Colin Warn <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2026 8:40 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Do Not Delay SB79 Implementation (Staff Report 7706)

EXTERNAL
Hello Santa Monica Council,
In a county with an affordability crisis, we should be doing everything we can to upzone near transit as fast as possible.

I’m extremely disappointed to see the current proposal is to delay full SB79 implementation. The reason people like Trump got elected is in no small part because of an affordability crisis, of which housing affordability is the largest factor (which is a function of how many housing units are available, dictated in no small part by zoning laws).

Please do not continue to perpetuate a system that continues to make places like Santa Monica unaffordable, giving people more reasons for people to vote for candidates like Trump.

Regards,
Colin Warn
90292
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 2 David Yakobson
From: Ann Maggio <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2026 11:09 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Public hearing item 12B - provide visual for inventory of sites eligible for temporary exclusion

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council and city Manager,
Where are the visuals of the inventory list? A large number of the population understand visuals but staff has failed to provide these.

Public Hearings require staff to be as transparent as possible. Please demand that this item include clearly marked visual(s) of each and every site on the attached inventory list that is eligible for temporary exclusion. A listing of the inventory without a visual disadvantages the vast majority of the citizenry.

The public can only comment on what is able to comprehend from the documents provided by city staff. A listing without visuals lacks transparency. Fix this now so you are as transparent as possible.

Thank you.

Ann Thanawalla
Sent from my iPhone
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 3 David Yakobson
From: Kevin McKeown <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2026 10:48 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Oliver Chi; Jing Yeo
Subject: Item 12-B — Protect Pico renters!

EXTERNAL
I implore you to keep in mind one overriding imperative as you re-zone part of the Pico neighborhood to give SB79 relief near L.A.’s Expo/Bundy light rail station:

Under no circumstances should any existing Santa Monica residents be forced out of their homes! Please analyze carefully which multi-family parcels might be subject to immediate development pressure if you up-zone them. That development, for a renter household, is likely to mean displacement and an inability to remain part of our Santa Monica community.

While up-zoning R-1 lots may raise concerns about “neighborhood character,” a single-family homeowner remains in control of their own property and does not face involuntary displacement.

Are there more nuanced options than re-zoning R-1 vs. re-zoning R-2 and R-3? You may not have to settle for an either/or in accommodating L.A.’s failure to zone appropriately around mass transit, as Santa Monica has done.

You could up-zone only those multi-family parcels where the economics are such that no renters will be displaced, and up-zone enough R-1s (with no displacement) to meet the statutory thresholds to defer more drastic impacts on the Pico neighborhood.

Thanks,
Kevin McKeown
retired former Mayor
————————————
K e v i n M c K e o w n
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mckeown.net__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!o0N5H2kgKRh3OEDWtMBVZRo Gm8NQI39mYp9P5TORwbljE793S1BWLuk5GZFMl65CdY81GTp8wkjc8j7kxlf2u0d3kyg$ Choose to be conscious
————————————
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 1 David Yakobson
From: Mathew Millen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 2:10 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: 7/14 item 12B/ SB79

EXTERNAL
Listing property by assessor parcel number is a total obfuscation and lack of transparency. please continue this item or before the meeting LIST THE STREET ADDRESS ACCOCIATED WITH EACH PARCEL.

Thanks for your consideration
Mathew Millen Pico Neighborhood resident
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 2 David Yakobson
From: Miles Freeman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 4:17 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 12B

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing as a long-time renter who lives in Santa Monica and opposes the newly proposed ordinance regarding SB79. The proposed ordinance seeks to, in effect, largely delay implementation with SB79 until 2030.

Respectfully, your constituents cannot wait another 4 years to even begin to see more affordable housing come to one portion of Santa Monica. California is in the midst of a housing crisis. The average LA area home costs over $1 million. The average age for first-time homebuyers in California is somewhere in the late 30s to early 40s. Santa Monicans need more affordable housing now, not sometime in the 2030s. And transit-oriented development is particularly needed given how congested LA's streets and highways are already.

I am asking that you please move more quickly to implement SB79 and respectfully request that you do not adopt the proposed ordinance set forth in Agenda Item 12B. Thank you.

Best,
Miles Freeman
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 3 David Yakobson
From: Santa Monica Forward <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 5:13 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Barry Snell; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Council Mailbox Cc: Bradley Ewing; Sam Shapiro-Kline
Subject: Oppose Item 12.B, SB79 Delay

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
Santa Monica Forward opposes delaying the implementation of SB79 in Santa Monica, which would eliminate a key lever in addressing our housing crisis.

Santa Monica has blocked new housing for decades, dating to a policy shift in the 1970s. The consequences of this approach are painfully obvious: living in Santa Monica is deeply unaffordable, if not outright unattainable for many. The people who make our city function cannot afford to live in it. The homes the city has blocked over the years could have housed the teachers who make our school district exceptional, the bus drivers who keep our city running on time, and the new families that keep our city vibrant and alive. S.B. 79 is a chance to finally change course.

Proponents of delaying the implementation of SB79 may claim that this is necessary to prevent displacement or gentrification. However this would be a continuation of the same policy which has resulted in displacement and gentrification across Santa Monica and the entire state.

On May 13, 2025, this same Council voted six to one to endorse a letter to the state senate in support of SB 79. At the time, Council fully recognized how important it was to build more housing in Santa Monica. That letter read “we are in a statewide housing crisis that demands bold, systems-level responses.” The situation hasn’t changed, but Council now seems ready to delay those same essential responses. By moving to delay S.B. 79, Council would make it clear that while it supports housing in theory, it does not support it in practice. SB79 was designed to place housing exactly where it should be - near-transit, in high resource areas.

Best,
Sam Shapiro-Kline & Brad Ewing
Co-Chairs, Santa Monica Forward
--
We are working for a diverse, progressive, sustainable and equitable Santa Monica.

SantaMonicaForward.org
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 1 David Yakobson
From: Will Finch <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 11:39 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Ellis Raskin; Lana Negrete; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Dan Hall
Subject: 12B: Please don’t delay implementation of SB 79!

EXTERNAL
Public comment for council meeting today.

SB 79 is one of the most important pieces of legislation in California. We should not be delaying its effects. Santa Monica needs transit oriented housing as much as the rest of the state, and it is urgent. This is good for the environment and for improving affordable housing options.

If the delay is absolutely unavoidable, then please quickly expedite our alternative TOD plan (alternative 2 under SB 79) rather than waiting years for the full implementation while we continue to fall behind on necessary housing.

Will Finch, 90405
Sent from my iPhone
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 2 David Yakobson
From: Ann Maggio <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 11:46 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: 12B - SCAG says dedicated Bus lanes are for speed and reliability- a 5 blocks qualifies bus lane is NOT THAT

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
The staff report for item 12B uses the following criteria to upZone Wilmont. “ Santa Monica Boulevard and 4th Street

1. At the intersection of two or more major bus routes (Big Blue Bus Routes 2 & 3, Big Blue Bus Routes 1 & 7, and Metro Line 4) with a frequency of service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

2. Adjacent to the full-time dedicated bus lane on Santa Monica Boulevard between Ocean Avenue and 5th Street.

3. Serviced by bus routes with operating intervals of 15 minutes or less, including Big Blue Bus Routes 1 and 7, and Metro Line

4. Please ask staff how a dedicated bus lane for five blocks qualifies to meet the criteria set by SCAG.

On page 79 of SCAG’s Regional Dedicated Transit Lanes Study it says dedicated bus lanes are used for SPEED and Reliability.
“ THE CASE FOR IMPROVING REGIONAL

TRANSIT TRAVEL
The SCAG region has ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in transportation, the number one cause of climate change, in part, by reducing single-occupancy vehicle trips and increasing transit mode share. A key step toward meeting these goals, as well as local and county goals for mobility and equity, can come from improving the speed and reliability of transit services throughout the region.

This Regional Dedicated Transit Lanes Study explores the opportunities, needs, challenges, and best practices for developing a regional network of dedicated bus lanes and other transit priority treatments. This regional transit priority network is intended to enable enhanced transit services, improved mobility, accessibility and sustainability, and advance implementation of Connect SoCal.

The study’s objectives were to identify:
•
The key benefits of dedicated bus lanes and the primary factors for successful implementation.
•
Provide a preliminary assessment on where dedicated bus lanes might be most feasible and beneficial in the SCAG region.
•
Provide recommendations and guidance for local
jurisdictions that are seeking to pilot or implement
dedicated bus lanes.”
Does a transit bus moving 5 blocks through downtown Santa Monica where there is a long stop light at every intersection have speed?
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 3 David Yakobson
From: Ann Maggio <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 11:59 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Re: 12B - SCAG says dedicated Bus lanes are for speed and reliability- a 5 blocks qualifies bus lane is NOT THAT

EXTERNAL
Addendum- staff is saying Wilmont upZoning should be included in the 1/2 mile be cause 4 BLOCKS (ocean Ave to 5th street)qualifies as a DEDICATED BUS Lane to meet SCAG criteria.

As previously cited, SCAG says dedicated bus lanes must provide SPEED and RELIABILITY.

How does a 4 blocks qualifies long dedicated bus line traveling through a delayed stop light and each intersection and traveling through the pedestrian Third Street Promenade meet the speed and reliability criteria?
It’s a joke. There’s no merit to it. It’s being used to gift developers to pressure Rent Controlled housing in Wilmont!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 14, 2026, at 11:46 AM, Ann Maggio <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear City Council,
The staff report for item 12B uses the following criteria to upZone Wilmont. “ Santa Monica Boulevard and 4th Street

1. At the intersection of two or more major bus routes (Big Blue Bus Routes 2 & 3, Big Blue Bus Routes 1 & 7, and Metro Line 4) with a frequency of service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

2. Adjacent to the full-time dedicated bus lane on Santa Monica Boulevard between Ocean Avenue and 5th Street.

3. Serviced by bus routes with operating intervals of 15 minutes or less, including Big Blue Bus Routes 1 and 7, and Metro Line 4.

Please ask staff how a dedicated bus lane for five blocks qualifies to meet the criteria set by SCAG.

On page 79 of SCAG’s Regional Dedicated Transit Lanes Study it says dedicated bus lanes are used for SPEED and Reliability.

Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 4 “ THE CASE FOR IMPROVING REGIONAL

TRANSIT TRAVEL
The SCAG region has ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in transportation, the number one cause of climate change, in part, by reducing single-occupancy vehicle trips and increasing transit mode share. A key step toward meeting these goals, as well as local and county goals for mobility and equity, can come from improving the speed and reliability of transit services throughout the region.

This Regional Dedicated Transit Lanes Study explores the opportunities, needs, challenges, and best practices for developing a regional network of dedicated bus lanes and other transit priority treatments. This regional transit priority network is intended to enable enhanced transit services, improved mobility, accessibility and sustainability, and advance implementation of Connect SoCal.

The study’s objectives were to identify:
•
The key benefits of dedicated bus lanes and the primary factors for successful implementation.
•
Provide a preliminary assessment on where dedicated bus lanes might be most feasible and beneficial in the SCAG region.
•
Provide recommendations and guidance for local
jurisdictions that are seeking to pilot or implement
dedicated bus lanes.”
Does a transit bus moving 5 blocks through downtown Santa Monica where there is a long stop light at every intersection have speed?
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 5 David Yakobson
From: Nikki Kolhoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 12:00 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: City Council July 14, 2026 - Item 12B SB79 Bus Stops - OPPOSE

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council –
I urge you to oppose the addition of any bus stops in the SB79 plan in Item 12B.

You have been out of step with this community on SB79 from its inception. You endorsed it out of the gate – well before it was in final form – and were one of only two cities in the whole state to do so. Most other cities, including the city of Los Angeles are opposing SB79 and trying to push back on implementing it because they recognize the harm it causes to existing communities by incentivizing demolition and displacement.

First, we already have a compliant Housing Element and shouldn’t have to do more. Second, we already meet the targets of SB79 in volume and should not be forced to allow even more height and density.

Furthermore, adding bus lines subject to SB79 in Santa Monica makes a mockery of any legitimate planning process. The map was supposed to be fixed at passage, yet we see three new bus stops, effectively upzoning Wilmont to Washington and 10th. This is crazy and unjustified because bus stops are NOT indicative of “high quality transit” and they are easily manipulated by unaccountable decisionmakers to gift entitlement windfalls to investors overnight.

A few questions must be answered.

1. How many blocks must a dedicated bus line be? How does a dedicated lane of several blocks equate to high quality transit when the entire line impacts speed?

2. Who controls which blocks become dedicated and where is the environmental study regarding the impact of doing so on zoning?

3. Why are 15-minute peak intervals sufficient to justify massive upzoning? That is not good service by the standards of any city with functioning public transit.

4. Who controls the intervals and where is the environmental study regarding the impact of doing so on zoning?

5. How long does the line have to be in place with dedicated lanes and intervals to earn the upzoning?

6. What happens if the dedicated lane is removed? Does the owner have to tear the building down?

7. What happens if the intervals are increased? Does the owner have to tear the building down? Proximity to transit should not be a single metric that can fundamentally alter our communities without regard to any other real impacts on people currently living here. But more importantly, including bus lines in this plan creates massive opportunities for abuse and manipulation, the negative effects of which will be impossible to undo.

Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) 6 We are entitled to thoughtful planning that takes into account the community that lives here. SB79 is not that.

Regards,
Nikki Kolhoff
Santa Monica Resident
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.h
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Implementing SB79) Zoning Amendments to
Implement SB 79
City Council
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment SB 79 Overview and Updates
• Went into effect July 1, 2026
• Upzones housing development projects within ½ mile of a TOD stop if the project complies with certain requirements. • Provides guaranteed height, density and FAR standards for eligible housing projects near a TOD stop and additional concessions beyond State Density Bonus Law
• Provides opportunity for local control through alternative implementation options
• SCAG adopted official map identifying TOD stops on July 2, 2026
• TOD stops are divided into Tier 1 or Tier 2, depending on transit type and volume. Santa Monica only has Tier 2 TOD stops:
• All 3 Expo Light Rail stations in Santa Monica
• Bundy/Expo station in Los Angeles
• 3 Downtown Bus stops adjacent to full time transit lanes and 15 min or less service intervals in combined AM and PM Peak hours are Tier 2 TOD Stops
SB79
Info Page
https://www.santamonica.gov/
sb79-transit-oriented-development
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Consistent with SCAG
adoption of final map
on July 2
Downtown
17th St/SMC
Bergamot
Expo/Bundy All properties
within ½ mile of
the TOD stop:

Adjacent to TOD
stop (200 ft)
¼ mile
½ mile
SB 79 TOD Zones
The distance is measured in a
straight line from the nearest
edge of the parcel to a
pedestrian access point for
the TOD stop. Gov. Code, §
65912.157, subd. (b)
Santa
Monica/3rd
Santa Monica/4th
Ocean/Broadway
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment SB 79 Project Eligibility Criteria
 Location: within ½ mile of a TOD stop.
 Housing Project: Doesn’t include any portion designated for hotel, motel, or transient lodging.  Number of Units: At least 5 dwelling units.
 Minimum Density: The greater of either of 30 units per acre or minimum density allowed under local zoning.
 Average Unit Size: Maximum average total floor area 1,750 net square feet.  Anti-Displacement: Not located on a site with more than 2 units where project would require demolition of rent controlled or affordable units occupied by tenants within the last 7 years or have had more than 2 rent controlled or affordable units demolished within 7 years of application.  Affordability: If 10 units or more, complies with affordability requirements specified in SB 79 (7% ELI, or 10% VLI, or 13% lower income ) or local inclusionary requirements (AHPP) if it mandates higher percentage or deeper affordability. Rental units must be deed restricted for 55 years and ownership units must be deed restricted for 45 years.
 Labor Standards: Complies with labor standards if over 85 feet in height.

Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment SB 79 Guaranteed Standards
Location Minimum Permitted
Development
Minimum Density to Qualify for
Additional Concessions
Additional Concessions
Beyond SDBL
Tier 2 Stop
Adjacent
• Height: 85 ft
• Density: 140 du/ac
• FAR: 4.0
75 units/acre
• 3 for projects
providing housing
for extremely lowincome households
• 2 for projects
providing housing
for very lowincome households
• 1 for projects
providing housing
for low-income
households
Within ¼ mile
• Height: 65 ft
• Density: 100 du/ac
• FAR: 3.0
Within ½ mile
• Height: 55 ft
• Density: 80 du/ac
• FAR: 2.5
60 units/acre
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Planning Commission and Council
 April 15, 2026 - Planning Commission SB79 study session • Recommended two-track approach to implement a Temporary Exclusion of Sites Until 2030 (Approach 2) and return at a later date with a TOD Alternative Plan (Approach 3)  April 28, 2026 - City Council SB79 study session
• Direction to proceed with PC recommendation on temporary exclusion ordinance and as part of future TOD alternative plan:
• Investigate right-to-return policies
• Explore inter-parcel transfer of density within TOD Zones • Prioritize the Expo/Bundy TOD Zone in a TOD Alternative Plan  June 17, 2026 - Planning Commission public hearing
• Recommended adoption of zoning amendments that would:
• Temporarily exclude qualified sites from SB 79 until one year following the adoption of the 7th Cycle Housing Element
• Upzone R2/R3 parcels within ½ mile of the Expo/Bundy Station in order exclude all parcels within the Expo/Bundy TOD zone
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Council-Directed SB 79 Alternative Options
• Enact ordinance temporarily excluding TOD Zones from SB79 in order to allow comprehensive planning to occur with forthcoming LUCE update and 7th Cycle Housing Element update

1. Implementation with Excluded
Sites Until 2030 (1 year after 7th
Cycle HE adoption)
Adopt an ordinance to temporarily exclude sites from SB 79 until 2030 per the criteria in SB 79:
• Site is located in a TOD Zone that has 33% of sites offering 50% of SB 79’s density and permitted FAR and 75% overall TOD Density
• Already allow at least 50% of SB 79’s densities and FAR (SM commercial zone parcels)
• Sites with locally designated historic resources before January 1, 2025 *Note that other kinds of sites (e.g. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, vulnerable to 1 ft of sea level rise) are not shown as they are not located in Santa Monica

2. Prepare TOD Alternative Plan
as part of forthcoming
comprehensive planning (General
Plan Update, 7thCycle Housing
Element)
• TOD alternative plan allows cities to adopt their own SB 79 plan and reallocate housing capacities across TOD Zones or TOD sites, subject to certain rules • Must be adopted by Ordinance, and reviewed by HCD (can also be included in 7th Cycle Housing Element)
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Exclusion Ordinance Methodology
To determine which sites are eligible for exclusion, staff applied the following steps to the modeling:

Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment TOD Zone Exclusion Results
• All TOD Zones in Santa Monica meet criteria to
be excluded from SB79
except for Expo/Bundy
• City’s local upzoning
from 6th Cycle Housing
Element implementation
already exceeds SB79
density
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment SB79 Potential Displacement Impact Expo/Bundy
 381 parcels total in TOD Zone
• 89 parcels that are not eligible to use SB79
• 49 parcels located also in Bergamot TOD Zone (already qualifies for exclusion) • 36 Parcels that have 3 or more units and at least 1 rent-controlled unit – project-level exclusion
• 4 parcels with deed-restricted affordable units – project-level exclusion • 54 commercially zoned parcels - already have local standards that are equal or more than SB79 standards
• 233 Residentially-zoned parcels that likely do not have involuntary displacement risk • 212 R1 parcels - ownership units
• 5 parcels with no existing units
• 16 multi-unit zoned – ownership units (e.g. single-unit dwelling, TORCA) • 5 parcels with potential involuntary displacement impact • 2 parcels with 2 or fewer units
• 3 parcels with 3 or more units and no rent-controlled units Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Expo/Bundy TOD Zone
• Expo/Bundy TOD Zone presents
unique circumstances
• Majority of the zone (approximately
75%) lies in the City of Los Angeles
• Commercially zoned parcels in Santa
Monica portion of TOD Zone are
significantly larger than the rest of the
city meaning there are fewer total
sites to qualify the TOD zone for
exclusion
• Need at least 33% of sites to be zoned
for at least 50% of SB79 standards to
qualify for TOD zone exclusion
• 74 commercially-zoned parcels
already meet or exceed SB79
standards
• Need 52 additional parcels
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Expo/Bundy Targeted Upzoning
R2 Parcels
R3 Parcels
• 66 multi-unit zoned parcels located
within ½ mile of Expo/Bundy Station
are proposed to be upzoned in
order to qualify the Expo/Bundy
TOD Zone for temporary exclusion
from SB79 • 60 R2-zoned parcels would be
upzoned from 1.0 FAR and 29 du/ac
to 1.25 FAR and 40 du/ac
• 6 R3-zoned parcels (which already
has FAR of 1.5) would be upzoned
only in terms of density from 35
du/ac to 40 du/ac
R2 parcels overlap
with Bergamot TOD
Zone
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment R2 Parcels – Comparison with Existing Standards
Hypothetical Site Characteristics
• R2 Zone
• Typical Parcel Size: 6,500 sf
• Vacant/No Affordable or Rent Controlled Units
• Located within ½ mile of Expo/Bundy Station
• Exclude ADUs and State Density Bonus
FAR Height Density Max Units
Existing 1.0 30 ft 1 du/1,500 sf (~29 du/ac) 4 du
SB 684 (Small Lot
Subdivisions)
• 1.0 (3-7 du)
• 1.25 (8-10 du)
Same as
underlying*
Min. 600 SF per Resulting
Parcel or 30 du/ac
(10 du max)
10 du
SB 79 2.5 55 ft 80 du/ac 12 du
Targeted Upzoning 1.25 30 ft 40 du/ac 6 du
*application of standard cannot physically preclude the construction of 2 units at least 800 sf on each parcel Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment R3 Parcels - Comparison with Existing Standards
Hypothetical Site Characteristics
• R3 Zone
• Typical Parcel Size: 6,500 sf
• Vacant/No Affordable or Rent Controlled Units
• Located within ½ mile of Expo/Bundy Station
• Exclude ADUs and State Density Bonus
FAR Height Density Max Units
Existing Santa Monica
Zoning

1.5 40 ft 1 du/1,250 sf (~35 du/ac) 5 du
Existing State Law:

SB 684 (Small Lot
Subdivisions)
• 1.0 (3-7 du)
• 1.25 (8-10 du)
Same as
underlying*
Min. 600 SF per Resulting
Parcel or 30 du/ac
(10 du max)
10 du
SB 79 2.5 55 ft 80 du/ac 12 du
Proposed Upzoning 1.25 30 ft 40 du/ac 6 du
*application of standard cannot physically preclude the construction of 2 units at least 800 sf on each parcel Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Targeted Upzoning – Assessment of Displacement Risk
• Considered likelihood of turnover based
on the following:
• Existing Use
• Comparison of existing units to potential
upzoned density
• Comparison of upzoning to existing State
law
• Combination of State and local
requirements
R2 Parcels
R3 Parcels
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Targeted Upzoning – Assessment of Displacement Risk
Analysis concluded there would be No or Low Displacement Risk for all 66 parcels proposed for upzoning
• No Displacement Risk – 30 parcels:
• No existing units (e.g. surface parking lot)
• Ownership housing (e.g. single-unit dwelling, condos) • More existing units than potential upzoned density
• Existing affordable deed-restricted units
• Low Displacement Risk – 36 parcels unlikely to redevelop:
• More than 50% of total potential upzoned density would be replacement units • Potential upzoned density is substantially the same as what is allowed under existing State housing laws
• Replacement unit requirements under State law + City’s inclusionary housing requirements (AHPP) + Rent Control provisions make redevelopment unlikely Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Expo/Bundy TOD Zone Exclusion Option
If targeted upzoning of 66
multifamily zoned parcels occurs: If NO upzoning occurs:

Exclusion Criteria Expo/Bundy TOD Zone will meet the
33% criteria for temporary exclusion
from SB 79.

Expo/Bundy TOD Zone will NOT meet
the 33% criteria for temporary
exclusion from SB 79.

Displacement Risk Minimized Substantially increased especially for rent-controlled parcels with 2 or fewer
units
Effect All parcels in the Expo/Bundy TOD
zone, including 212 R1 zoned parcels,
can be temporarily excluded from SB
79 standards until 2030.

All parcels located in the Expo/Bundy
TOD zone, including 212 R1 zoned
parcels, would be subject to SB 79
standards (which guarantees densities
of 80 du/ac or 100 du/ac, depending on
distance to station).

Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Summary of Potential Options for Expo/Bundy
• Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance
to exclude Expo/Bundy TOD Zone
• Direction to upzone 66 R2 & R3
zoned-parcels
• Alternative: Upzone 212 R1 parcels
• Would qualify TOD Zone for
exclusion
• Alternative: Take No Action
• Allows SB79 to take effect
• Involuntary displacement risk to 5
parcels
• Only upzoning parcels in ¼ mile
radius would not upzone sufficient
number of parcels to meet criteria
R1 Parcels
R2 Parcels
R3 Parcels
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Next Steps for SB 79
• June 30 - Staff submitted draft SB 79 Exclusion Ordinance to HCD • If adopted by Council:
• Within 60 days of adoption, Staff will submit SB 79 Exclusion Ordinance to HCD for review period (up to 120 days)
• Ordinance becomes effective 30 days after Second Reading (even if HCD review is not completed), anticipated end of August
• SB 79 is already in effect as of July 1 and will continue until the effective date of SB 79 Exclusion Ordinance
• City staff to continue work on TOD Alternative Plan
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Recommended Actions
Staff Recommends that City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of statutory exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Government Code Section 65912.160(c); and

2. Introduce for First Reading an Ordinance to Amend the Text of the Zoning Ordinance to Exclude Certain Sites from Senate Bill (SB) 79 Implementation Until One Year Following the Adoption of the 7th Cycle (2029-2037) Housing Element and to Increase Development Standards for Parcels Zoned Multi-Unit Residential That Are Located Within One-Half Mile of the Metro E Expo/Bundy Station
Minor Correction to Table 9.06.030 title to read: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR HOUSING PROJECTS—

MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL PARCELS EXCLUSIVELY WITHIN ONE-HALF MILE OF EXPO/BUNDY METRO E STATION Additional Direction:
• Direct City Manager to proactively engage with parcels at risk of involuntary displacement not covered by SB79’s displacement protections
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Questions?
Questions?
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026
Item 12-B
July 14, 2026

12.B.i
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7706 : Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 12.C
1 of 9
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jing Yeo, Director, Administration
Subject: Introduction and Adoption of Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance Establishing Standards and Procedures for Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Introduce and Adopt an Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Monica to Establish Standards and Procedures of Approval for Light Fleet-Based Service For Autonomous Vehicles and Creation of a Use Classification for Light-Fleet Based Service For Autonomous Vehicles.

Summary
Recent development proposals have introduced fleet maintenance operations for autonomous vehicles. Based on the City’s experience with existing facilities, it has become clear that uses introduce land use impacts not fully addressed by existing regulations.

This report presents a regulatory framework, to be adopted by an Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance (EIZO) to address the growing light fleet-based services (e.g., delivery, ride-hailing) for autonomous vehicle fleets within the City. Emerging operational patterns—particularly autonomous vehicle fleet staging, maintenance, and dispatch—have raised concerns. Key concerns identified include:
• Queuing and staging in the public right-of-way

12.C
Packet Pg. 759
2 of 9
• Obstruction of emergency access routes
• Noise and lighting impacts on nearby residential areas • Lack of operational accountability for fleet dispatch systems The proposed framework introduces a new use classification for autonomous light fleetbased services and objective operational standards to mitigate impacts from fleet operations.

On May 26, 2026, GoBiz, which is the State agency that provides guidance to local jurisdictions regarding EV charging, raised concerns about a previously-proposed EIZO designed to regulate light fleet-based services co-located with EV charging infrastructure. Staff has completed consultation with GoBiz, including the correspondence included as Attachment B to this report, and made adjustments to the regulatory framework consistent with that consultation. The attached EIZO reflects those adjustments by maintaining sufficient separation between the State’s regulatory framework for permitting EV charging stations and light-fleet based operations for autonomous vehicles that may, or may not, use EV charging infrastructure as part of those operations.

The proposed EIZO establishes a limited discretionary review process through a Minor Use Permit, retained for proposed operations that cannot meet the enumerated objective operational conditions. This framework reflects several policy priorities:
• Mobility Innovation: Establishes objective standards for fleet operations for autonomous vehicles, including maintenance
• Neighborhood Protection: Establishes enforceable safeguards for adjacent residential areas
• Operational Accountability: Places responsibility on operators to actively manage impacts
At least one application for a light fleet-based service for autonomous vehicles located in close proximity to residential neighborhoods is pending. Based on documented operational patterns at comparable facilities that have demonstrated recurring traffic obstructions, queuing spillback into public rights-of-way, and emergency access

12.C
Packet Pg. 760
3 of 9
blockages that the proposed facility, without operating conditions, the proposed autonomous fleet-based services pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare. These impacts arise from concentrated arrival surges, limited driveway capacity, and how long autonomous vehicles spend time on a site that present foreseeable risks. Continuous 24-hour operations further exacerbate these risks by introducing nighttime queuing, noise, and light intrusion during sensitive hours, as evidenced by over 140 complaints associated with similar facilities. Additional inquiries for similar facilities have been received.

Ministerial review, without specific operating conditions attached, does not provide sufficient ability to regulate autonomous fleet dispatch practices or impose enforceable operational controls necessary to prevent these impacts. As a result, given the pending applications and inquiries for these uses, there is an urgent need to establish objective operational standards through the proposed Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance. The emergency interim ordinance would become effective immediately upon adoption and remain in effect for 60 days (September 12, 2026) unless extended pursuant to SMMC Section 9.46.090(C).

Background
Potential Impacts from Light Fleet-Based Vehicle Services for Autonomous Vehicles
Light fleet-based vehicle service operations for autonomous vehicles are a distinct land use separate from other light fleet-based uses due to their centralized operational characteristics. Fleet operations for autonomous vehicles involve higher traffic volumes due to coordinated vehicle returns, continuous nighttime activity, simultaneous charging demand, extended dwell times, and the requirement for on-site staff to maintain and monitor the vehicles, making the facility function more like an industrial worksite. These operational characteristics can create concentrated queuing conditions that exceed available on-site storage capacity and affect adjacent public rights-of-way. The City’s experience with fleet operations for autonomous vehicles indicate that operational impacts are associated with the fleet-based nature of the use itself, particularly where there are autonomous vehicles.

12.C
Packet Pg. 761
4 of 9
Queuing and Right-of-Way Obstruction
Existing autonomous fleet operations in the city have shown recurring vehicle queues extending into adjacent alleys and circulation areas. Observed conditions included:
• Queuing within alleys
• Vehicles pausing within travel lanes
• Reduced circulation capacity
• Manual intervention by on-site personnel, and
• Interference with access and circulation
Queue lengths at existing facilities have been observed to reach approximately 15 vehicles. Applying conservative vehicle storage assumptions, a queue of this size would occupy approximately 330 to 375 feet. If not managed appropriately, vehicle queuing could potentially obstruct the public right-of-way and depending on site specific conditions, could interfere with:
• Turning movements
• Sight distance
• Transit operations
• Access to adjacent driveways
• Curbside parking
• Traffic signal operations and
• Vehicle merging activity near intersections
This potential spillover into the public right-of-way could obstruct adjacent streets and alleys. In the case of autonomous vehicles, this may result in longer obstruction duration due to delays in manual intervention to reposition vehicles during congestion events. This extended obstruction could potentially interfere with:
• Emergency vehicle access
• Fire apparatus maneuverability
• Refuse collection, and
• Service vehicle circulation

12.C
Packet Pg. 762
5 of 9
Noise & Light Impacts From Continuous 24-hour Operation Existing autonomous fleet operations facilities operate continuously on a 24-hour basis and have resulted in noise and light impacts, particularly during sensitive overnight periods adjacent to residentially-zoned properties.

Discussion
Based on the City’s observations of existing facilities, the potential impacts from light fleet-based vehicles services for autonomous vehicles include a potential public right-ofway obstruction due to a higher-volume traffic environment and light and noise impacts due to continuous operational intensity adjacent to residential neighborhoods particularly during overnight hours. These potential impacts warrant creating a framework to establish objective standards that would clarify locational restrictions for light fleet-based vehicle services for autonomous vehicles and create enforceable operational conditions to mitigate the potential impacts of future uses on adjacent residential neighborhoods.

1. New Use Classification
The proposed interim ordinance includes a new use classification called “Light FleetBased Service for Autonomous Vehicles”. The classification applies to autonomous passenger transportation services, delivery services, medical transport services, autonomous vehicle fleets, and similar operations involving fleets of three or more vehicles under 10,000 pounds. The proposed use classification distinguishes fleet operations for autonomous vehicles from other light fleet-based services and traditional EV charging-only facilities due to the unique characteristics of fleet operations for autonomous vehicles.

The proposed EIZO establishes new objective operational standards for light fleetbased vehicle services for autonomous vehicles within the General Commercial (GC), Industrial Conservation (IC), and Transit Adjacent (TA) zoning districts. For facilities within 100 feet of residentially-zoned property, the proposed interim ordinance establishes additional noise and light restrictions related to:

12.C
Packet Pg. 763
6 of 9
• Noise mitigation
• Overnight operational restrictions
• Sound walls
• Lighting orientation and shielding and
• Headlight and glare controls.

The proposed ordinance also prohibits more than one fleet-based services for autonomous vehicles per block.

2. Permitting Framework
Qualifying projects would generally be processed ministerially through permit review and compliance based on objective conditions. However, the ordinance retains a Minor Use Permit process if the Director determines the proposed project cannot meet the specifically enumerated operational conditions.

The purpose of the MUP is to hold a public hearing to gather information that would inform the development of site-specific operational conditions. This structure allows for targeted oversight for situations where the potential for site-specific adverse health and safety impacts may occur.

3. Objective Operational Standards
The ordinance establishes objective operational standards designed to mitigate impacts associated with autonomous fleet operations, including:

A. Dispatch Coordination
• Required Parking and Loading Operations Plan
• Real-time management of vehicle arrivals and site capacity • Integration of dispatch systems with on-site conditions B. Prohibition on Off-Site Queuing
• No staging or idling in public streets or alleys
• All queuing must occur on-site
• If vehicles are enroute to the site and they must delay or circulate, such circulation shall not occur within one-half mile of the site.

12.C
Packet Pg. 764
7 of 9
C. Limits on total vehicles based on on-site capacity
• The number vehicles on site cannot exceed the number of available parking spaces
D. Minimum Emergency Access Clearances
• Maintain a mandatory 11-foot emergency access on streets and alleys E. On-Site Staffing
• Minimum of two trained personnel at all times
• Active monitoring of site operations and surrounding right-of-way • Authority to regulate or suspend dispatch activity
F. Monitoring and Compliance
• Ongoing City oversight
• Mandatory coordination meetings and updated plans as needed • Required operational adjustments if impacts occur
G. Additional Requirements
• Site liaison contact with requirement that operator respond to complaints in a timely manner
• Targeted zoning exemptions recognizing the unique nature of light fleet-based vehicle service associated with EV charging
For sites within 100 feet of residentially-zoned property, the following additional noise and light restrictions would apply:

A. Noise Controls
• Compliance with City noise standards
• Restrictions on noise levels for overnight operations (11 PM – 6 AM) • Sound wall and site design requirements where applicable B. Lighting Controls
• Shielded lighting to prevent glare
• Illumination limited to minimum safety requirements
• Restrictions on overnight lighting levels (11pm – 6am) Environmental Review

12.C
Packet Pg. 765
8 of 9
The proposed EIZO is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Sections 15308 and Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Section 15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment) exempts "actions taken by regulatory agencies as authorized by state law or local ordinance to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment”. The proposed EIZO establishes a new land use classification and objective operational standards for light fleet-based services associated with autonomous vehicles. The ordinance is intended to protect the public and surrounding environment by establishing enforceable operational requirements that address potential operational impacts, including vehicle queuing, circulation, emergency access, lighting, noise, and staffing, particularly in locations adjacent to residential neighborhoods. The ordinance also establishes monitoring, compliance, and enforcement provisions designed to ensure continued protection of the public right-ofway and surrounding land uses. Because the ordinance imposes regulatory requirements intended to reduce potential environmental impacts, it is exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15308.

The proposed EIZO is also exempt under Section 15061(b)(3), which state that CEQA does not apply “where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” The proposed EIZO would create new objective, operational standards for autonomous light-fleet based services that are designed to reduce impacts of such facilities and does not approve any specific project, authorize construction, or permit any alteration of the environment for such services. Since the ordinance itself establishes operational restrictions intended to minimize potential impacts and does not directly result in a physical change to the environment, it can be seen with certainty that adoption of the EIZO will not have a significant effect on the environment.

Accordingly, the proposed EIZO is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15308 and 15061(b)(3).

12.C
Packet Pg. 766
9 of 9
Financial Impacts
There is no immediate financial impact or budget action necessary as a result of the recommended action. Staff will return to Council if specific budget actions are required in the future.

Prepared By: Jing Yeo, Director
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV B. RE_ GO-Biz Concerns Re_ Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item 12.A.

C. Written Comments (May 26, 2026)
D. Written Comments
E. ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION
F. ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION
G. PowerPoint Presentation

12.C
Packet Pg. 767
1 City Council Meeting: July 14, 2026 Santa Monica, California ORDINANCE NUMBER _____ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

AN EMERGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MONICA TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES OF

APPROVAL FOR LIGHT FLEET-BASED SERVICE FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES

AND CREATE A USE CLASSIFICATION FOR LIGHT FLEET-BASED SERVICE FOR

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES
WHEREAS, recent development proposals have introduced high volume fleet maintenance operations for autonomous vehicles; and
WHEREAS, these uses introduce land use impacts not fully addressed by existing regulations; and
WHEREAS, documented key concerns include, but are not limited to: (1) Queuing and staging in the public right-of-way; (2) Obstruction of emergency access routes; (3) Noise and lighting impacts on nearby residential areas; and (4) Lack of operational accountability for fleet dispatch systems; and
WHEREAS, based on prior documented occurrences, additional impacts may arise due to concentrated arrival surges, limited driveway capacity, and the duration autonomous vehicles remain on-site; and
WHEREAS, continuous 24-hour operations further exacerbate these concerns by introducing nighttime queuing, noise, and light intrusion during sensitive hours, as evidenced by over 140 complaints associated with certain existing facilities used for fleet management; and
WHEREAS, this emergency ordinance provides a framework that introduces a new use classification for fleet-based services for autonomous vehicles, and objective

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV 2 operational standards to mitigate impacts from this emerging land use, and a process for review and approval of such uses; and
WHEREAS, the emergency ordinance provides a limited discretionary review process for projects that cannot comply with the enumerated operational standards; and WHEREAS, this emergency ordinance is consistent with the City’s local authority to address land use and public safety impacts involving autonomous vehicle fleet operations; and
WHEREAS, several applications for high-intensity fleet maintenance operations for autonomous vehicles have necessitated the immediate need for the City to address these land use impacts; and
WHEREAS, adoption of this Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance is necessary to preserve public peace, health, safety and welfare as it will allow the City to address land use impacts and public safety associated with fleet maintenance operations for autonomous vehicles.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.31.165, Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles, is hereby added and shall read as follows:

9.31.165 Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles A. Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this Section is to set forth specific standards for Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles, as defined by Section

9.51.020(D)(6.5), in order to mitigate impacts to public right-of-way, impacts on adjacent

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV 3 residentially zoned property, and documented adverse impacts upon public health or safety.

B. Location. Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles shall be permitted in the General Commercial (GC), Industrial Conservation (IC), and Transit Adjacent (TA) Zoning Districts, subject to ministerial approval or a Minor Use Permit as set forth in subsection (C), below.

C. Procedure.

1. Minor Use Permit Required. A Minor Use Permit shall be required in accordance with Chapter 9.41, unless the proposed use has received a Light-Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles Zoning Conformance Permit and complies with the operational conditions set forth in Section D. A Minor Use Permit application shall be submitted to the City in compliance with Chapter 9.41, except that the Minor Use Permit shall be reviewed based only on the following findings:
a. The proposed use is conditionally allowed within the applicable Zoning District.
b. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
c. The proposed use will not detrimentally affect nearby neighborhoods, considering the distance of the proposed use to residentially-zoned parcels and other existing light fleet-based services for autonomous vehicles.

2. Ministerial Approval. Applications for Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles Zoning Conformance Permits meeting the requirements of Section D shall be reviewed and approved administratively in accordance with Section 9.37.160.

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV 4 D. Light Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles Zoning Conformance Permit. Applicants for Light Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles shall be eligible for a Light Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicle Zoning Conformance Permit if such permit is approved in writing by the Director and the applicant agrees in writing to comply with all of the following criteria and operational conditions:

1. Dispatch Coordination Plan
a. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a Parking and Loading Operations Plan with a fleet dispatch coordination component that indicates when dispatching and vehicle arrivals will be slowed, held, or suspended for review and approval by the Mobility Division. The plan shall demonstrate how vehicle arrivals will be managed to prevent queuing in the public right-of-way. b. The plan shall coordinate dispatch timing with internal site circulation and shall include, at a minimum, procedures for managing arrival rates, monitoring site occupancy in real time, and preventing vehicle staging when the facility is at capacity.
c. Operation of the facility shall be conducted in accordance with the approved plan.

2. Prohibition on Off-site Queuing and Emergency Vehicle Access Clearance a. Queuing.
i. Fleet vehicles shall not queue, stage, or idle in the public rightof-way, including adjacent alleys, or nearby residential streets. ii. All queuing must be accommodated within the site. Vehicles shall circulate off-site if the facility is at capacity.

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV 5 iii. If vehicles already en route to the site must delay or circulate in order to comply with the approved arrival-rate and occupancy management strategy, such circulation shall not occur within a half mile of the site.
b. Adjacent alleys.
i. Adjacent alleys shall not be used for routine vehicle staging or queuing and may only function as an emergency overflow relief (“safety valve”) to preserve required clearance and prevent obstruction of highervolume streets. ii. Any temporary use of the alley for this purpose shall maintain the required 11-foot clear path at all times and shall be actively managed by on-site personnel.

3. Minimum Clearance.
a. At all times, a minimum 11-foot clear width shall be maintained in all alleys and access ways consistent with all applicable provisions of the Santa Monica Municipal Code and fire access standards.
b. Vehicles shall not stage, queue, or idle in a manner that obstructs emergency vehicles or essential services on any adjacent public right-of-way.

4. Emergency Operations. Operations shall be conducted such that emergency access is continuously maintained without reliance on ad hoc vehicle repositioning or delayed manual intervention.

5. Limit to total vehicles served. The total number of vehicles on-site shall not exceed the number of available parking spaces on-site.

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV 6 6. Minimum On-Site Staffing.
a. A minimum of two (2) trained on-site personnel shall be present during all hours of operation to actively manage vehicle circulation, coordinate fleet dispatch, prevent queuing in the public right-of-way, and ensure that required emergency access is maintained at all times. At least one staff member shall be assigned to monitor the site entrance and adjacent public right-of-way. b. On-site personnel shall be responsible for real-time coordination with the fleet operator or dispatch system to regulate vehicle arrivals so that vehicles are dispatched to the site only when sufficient on-site capacity is available.

Personnel shall monitor site occupancy, control arrival flow, direct vehicles to available spaces, and reposition vehicles as necessary to prevent obstruction of travel lanes, alleys, or emergency access routes.
c. Dispatching to the site shall be actively managed. It may be delayed, staggered, or suspended by the operator or on-site personnel as necessary to prevent queuing or circulation conflicts, or resolve queuing or circulation conflicts within five minutes.
d. At least one staff member shall be on-site during all hours of operation who is authorized and able to coordinate the removal, repositioning, remote movement, towing, or other clearance of any vehicle malfunction or other operational condition that blocks the public right-of-way or impedes on-site vehicle circulation. Site operations shall be actively monitored to identify such obstructions in real time, and clearance measures shall be initiated immediately and completed

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV 7 as soon as practicable, and in no event later than five minutes after the obstruction occurs, without the need for City notification or a complaint.

7. Operational Monitoring and Reporting Requirements.
a. The operator shall cooperate with ongoing City monitoring of site operations.
b. If the City determines that operations are not in compliance with the standards in this ordinance, including but not limited to, queuing, right-of-way obstruction, emergency access interference, or other public health and safety impacts, the operator shall participate in coordination meetings with the City and upon request, submit updated operational plans to mitigate impacts. Such updated plans may include required modifications to operations, including adjustments to staffing, dispatch coordination, or circulation management. Operator shall promptly implement operational modifications to the satisfaction of the City.

8. Site Liaison Contact Required.
a. Applicant shall designate a neighborhood liaison who is responsible for addressing neighbor and transportation-related concerns and complaints. b. If the operator receives any complaints about noise, light, glare, or traffic impacts, all reasonable efforts shall be taken to address and remediate the concerns in a timely manner.

9. Distance Requirement. No more than one Light Fleet-Based Services for Autonomous Vehicles use shall be permitted per block.

10. Special Standards for Sites within 100 feet of residentially zoned property.

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV 8 a. Noise Control Measures. The following noise control measures shall apply to light-fleet based services as a land use when associated with autonomous vehicles and located within 100 feet of a residentially-zoned property at the time the application is determined to be complete.
i. Operations shall comply with all applicable City noise regulations, including SMMC Chapter 4.12 (Noise), and shall be conducted in a manner that minimizes noise impacts on surrounding properties. ii. Operators shall install a sound wall of at least 8 feet high on the perimeter property lines and in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.21.180.
iii. The circulation of the site shall be designed to reduce the need to backup vehicles.
iv. Overnight Noise Restrictions. Between the hours of 11 p.m. and 6 a.m.:
(A) On parcels located within 100 feet of a residentiallyzoned property at the time the application for the operation is determined complete, no light fleet-based service operations for autonomous vehicles, as defined in Section 9.51.030(D)(6.5), shall be conducted.
(B) No noise shall be generated that is plainly audible from an adjacent residential property line or from a distance of 100 feet from the source of the noise, whichever is closer. For purposes of this section, “plainly audible” shall mean the sound in question can

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV 9 be easily detected, without undue effort, by an enforcement officer of normal unaided hearing. Words, phrases, or specific noise signatures need not be discernible or identifiable. When music is involved, the detection of rhythmic bass tones shall be sufficient to be considered plainly audible sound. Plainly audible does not implicate issues of subjective "loudness" – the plainly audible standard simply determines whether any noise can be heard regardless of the perceived "loudness." Plainly audible observation alone is sufficient to support and prove a noise disturbance. b. Lighting and Headlight Control
i. In accordance with Section 9.21.080, any on-site lighting shall be shielded in order to prevent light and glare impacts on nearby properties and uses.
ii. On-site lighting shall be oriented in a manner that faces away from all nearby residential uses.
iii. Between 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., site lighting shall not exceed the standards set forth in Section 9.21.080(F).

E. Enforcement. If it is determined that the Light Fleet-Based Vehicle Service for Autonomous Vehicles has violated the use standards in this section, or any MUP issued in accordance with this Section, the City may pursue all available remedies including, but not limited to, those under Section 9.48.

SECTION 2. Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.51.030(D)(6.5), Light FleetBased Service for Autonomous Vehicles, is hereby added and shall read as follows:

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV 10 9.51.030(D)(6.5) Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles. Passenger transportation services, local delivery services, medical transport, and other businesses that rely on fleets of 3 or more autonomous vehicles, as defined by Vehicle Code Section 38750, with rated capacities less than 10,000 lbs. This classification includes the following activities for autonomous vehicles, including, but not limited to, parking, dispatching, storage, fueling, cleaning, software servicing, vehicle maintenance and servicing, and offices for taxicab and limousine operations, ambulance services, nonemergency medical transport, local messenger and document delivery services, home cleaning services, and similar businesses. This classification does not include towing operations (see Automobile/Vehicle Sales and Service, Towing and Impound), or taxi or delivery services with 2 or fewer fleet vehicles on site (see Business Services). This classification also does not include electric vehicle charging-only facilities. Facilities with electric vehicle charging are not exempt from this classification solely because electric vehicle charging occurs on site.

SECTION 3. Any provision of the Santa Monica Municipal Code or any appendix thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV 11 declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. This Ordinance is declared to be an emergency measure necessary for preserving the public peace, health, safety or welfare, adopted pursuant to the provisions of Section 615 of the Santa Monica City Charter. As set forth in the findings above and in the July 14, 2026, staff report, this Ordinance is necessary for preserving the public peace, health, safety, and welfare. As an emergency measure, this Ordinance will be effective immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 6. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper within 15 days after its adoption. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be of no further force or effect as of September 12, 2026, unless it is otherwise extended pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.46.090(C).

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________

HEIDI VON TONGELN
City Attorney

12.C.a
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: CDD-ORD Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Services for AV [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV From: Hannah Goldsmith
To: Jing Yeo; Heidi von Tongeln; Michelle M. Hugard
Cc: Gia Vacin; Heather Hickerson; Jessie Denver; Elsa Alves; Van Nguyen Subject: RE: GO-Biz Concerns Re: Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item 12.A.

Date: Friday, June 12, 2026 12:08:17 PM
Attachments: image001.png

EXTERNAL
Dear Director Yeo, City Attorney von Tongeln, and members of the City Attorney’s Office and Community Development Department,
On behalf of GO-Biz, I’m following up to clarify and restate our remarks from our recent call regarding the City of Santa Monica’s processing of any pending ZEV charging infrastructure permit applications, as well as any new applications submitted while the City considers adoption of an AV-fleet-related ordinance.

Please note that any ZEV charging infrastructure permit applications submitted must still be processed in accordance with the requirements and timelines set forth in Government Code sections 65850.7 and 65850.71. These statutes remain fully applicable regardless of any parallel ordinance work underway at the City.

As you know, the appropriate mechanism for evaluating a proposed EV charging infrastructure project—and whether to apply any associated use conditions—is through the health and safety review process we’ve discussed. Under Government Code section 65850.7, applications to install EV charging infrastructure must be administratively approved through a nondiscretionary building permit, and the City’s review is limited to determining whether the proposed installation complies with objective health and safety standards under local, state, and federal law. A use permit or project conditions may be required upon a written, evidence-based finding of a specific, adverse impact on public health or safety, and any conditions imposed must represent the lowest cost mitigation necessary to address that impact.

Please feel free to reach out if it would be helpful to discuss any of this further. We very much appreciate your continued partnership.

Sincerely,
Hannah
Hannah Goldsmith (she/her)
Assistant Deputy Director, Legal Affairs
office: (916) 447-7942
1325 J Street, Suite 1800 | Sacramento, CA 95814

12.C.b
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: RE_ GO-Biz Concerns Re_ Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item 12.A. (7745 : Emergency IZO for Follow: LinkedIn | YouTube
From: Hannah Goldsmith
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2026 3:30 PM
To: 'Jing Yeo' <[email protected]>; Heidi von Tongeln <[email protected]>; Michelle M. Hugard <[email protected]> Cc: Gia Vacin <[email protected]>; Heather Hickerson <[email protected]>; Jessie Denver <[email protected]>; Elsa Alves-Wright <[email protected]>; Van Nguyen <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: GO-Biz Concerns Re: Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item

12.A.

Dear Director Yeo, City Attorney von Tongeln, and members of the City Attorney’s Office and Community Development Department,
Thank you again for speaking with us on June 4th about the draft emergency interim zoning ordinance, and for the thoughtful work your team is doing to address the community’s concerns regarding autonomous vehicle (AV) fleet operations in Santa Monica. (Please feel free to forward this email to the folks on the call I missed/that were not on the initial meeting invitation.) After reviewing the draft in detail, we wanted to provide more focused feedback and a suggested path forward. We initially indicated that we’d put together a red-line for your consideration. Given the number of interrelated changes needed to align the draft ordinance with Government Code section 65850.7 and the Attorney General’s legal alert, we determined a GO-Biz red-line is not the most workable approach. We believe it will be more helpful to clarify the core state-law principles that need to be preserved, and outline a path that still enables you to meet your land use and public health and safety objectives.

Additionally, we plan to circle back with conditioned permit examples, as requested, very soon.

1. Regulate the intended use separately from the EV charging permit From a state law perspective, the changes we’re recommending (in item 4) are intended to ensure compliance with the state’s electric vehicle (EV) charging streamlining laws.

EV charging infrastructure must be processed and approved ministerially, with review limited to objective health and safety standards, consistent with Gov. Code § 65850.7. As included in the Attorney General’s legal alert, Gov. Code §§ 65850.7 and 65850.71 prohibit jurisdictions from preemptively limiting EV charging stations to certain zones and these laws apply to all EV charging

12.C.b
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: RE_ GO-Biz Concerns Re_ Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item 12.A. (7745 : Emergency IZO for installations, regardless of whether the infrastructure is used for personal, public, or fleet use. (OAG2025-01, pages 4-5.) We believe it would be more consistent with Gov. Code § 65850.7 to regulate large light-duty fleet operations—or regulate light-duty AV fleet operations, if more appropriate in this case—wholly separately, such as through a fleet operation permit, not through the EV charging infrastructure permit.

2. The fleet definition should be narrowed to the actual target: high-intensity AV fleet depots As drafted, the “Light Fleet-Based Service with Electric Vehicle Charging” definition is much broader than the type of land use Santa Monica appears to be targeting. From the use standards in the ordinance, it seems clear that the City’s primary concern is high-intensity, likely AV, fleet operations.

However, the current definition includes “businesses that rely on fleets of 3 or more vehicles with rated capacities less than 10,000 lbs.” This threshold and phrasing will capture low-intensity, conventional businesses that do not necessarily require the same use standards for on-site staffing, queuing, dispatch, noise and light control, or other permit conditions included in the ordinance.

We recommend narrowing the definition, so it targets the intended use case (or cases), which appears to be—based upon many provisions of the current draft ordinance—high-intensity AV fleet operations.

3. Examples of fleets that will be unintentionally captured Because of the breadth of the current definition, we believe the ordinance will unintentionally apply to a number of uses where the proposed conditions are not appropriate or proportional. For example, it will apply to businesses such as commercial cleaning or janitorial services, local courier services, catering, construction, and landscaping businesses with three or more vehicles. And, it will seemingly apply to small home-services businesses (like pest control, pool maintenance, plumbing, HVAC repair, landscaping, etc.) that keep several light-duty vehicles on site but do not generate the kind of arrival surges or continuous operations that are the target of the ordinance.

The state would like to see these kinds of businesses electrify their fleets, even if they are small, and state regulations may be moving toward requirements in this regard (e.g., the California Air Resources Board is considering capturing private fleet vehicles, that are contracted by public entities for services, in its Advanced Clean Fleets regulation).

For these types of uses, requirements such as continuous onsite staffing, detailed dispatch coordination plans, and monitoring/reporting are unlikely to be justified by actual impacts, or aligned with state law if preemptively tied to the EV charging infrastructure permit approval (e.g., Gov. Code, § 65850.7, subd. (d) requires that any “conditions imposed on an application to install an [EV] charging station shall be designed to mitigate the specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety at the lowest cost possible”).

12.C.b
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: RE_ GO-Biz Concerns Re_ Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item 12.A. (7745 : Emergency IZO for

4. Recommended path: separate the high-intensity AV fleet permit and add an EV checklist question
To reconcile these concerns and still give you the tools you need, we recommend the following structure:

In Santa Monica’s EV charging station checklist, add one mandatory question to determine whether a proposed project will include AV fleet operations.

For example, something like “Will this site include autonomous vehicle fleet operations (e.g., dispatch, staging, storage, or maintenance of multiple autonomous vehicles)?” This would allow staff to identify when a project includes AV fleet use that may trigger a separate review/permit.

Create or use a separate fleet operations (or similar) permit for high-intensity AV fleet operation. Apply your desired use standards, as appropriate, through that permit, not through the EV charging infrastructure permit. With this, however, we recommend revising the fleet definition to focus on high-intensity AV fleet depots, as previously mentioned, rather than the three-vehicle general fleet threshold.

5. Concern about jurisdictional replication risk and degradation of AB 1236 / AB 970 As discussed on our June 4th call, and mentioned above regarding proposed statewide regulations, we are also looking at the potential for replication of this ordinance in other cities and counties. If this draft ordinance is adopted and used as a model by other jurisdictions, there is a real risk that EV charging approvals will increasingly be tied to broad, operationally-focused conditions. If that occurs, the intent of AB 1236 and AB 970 (Gov. Code, §§ 65850.7 and 65850.71)—to ensure local governments streamline, expedite, and avoid imposing unreasonable barriers on the installation of EV charging infrastructure so that California can meet its zero‑emission vehicle, air quality, climate, and economic development goals—will be eroded.

Our concern is not with your desire to manage high-intensity AV fleet operations; that is a legitimate local land use objective. The concern is that, if EV charging infrastructure permits become the vehicle for regulating those operations, other jurisdictions may follow suit and, in aggregate and via a patchwork, undermine the streamlining purpose of these California laws.

In conclusion, we believe the approach we recommended in this email is consistent with the requirements of Gov. Code § 65850.7 and the Attorney General’s legal alert, preserves the integrity of the state’s streamlining laws, and allows Santa Monica to address the real impacts you are seeing on the ground from high-intensity AV operations.

We would be happy to review a revised draft definition or a separate AV fleet operations ordinance if that would be helpful, and otherwise continue to coordinate with you. Thank you again for your leadership on EV infrastructure and for engaging so thoughtfully on these issues.

12.C.b
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: RE_ GO-Biz Concerns Re_ Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item 12.A. (7745 : Emergency IZO for Sincerely,
Hannah
Hannah Goldsmith (she/her)
Assistant Deputy Director, Legal Affairs
office: (916) 447-7942
1325 J Street, Suite 1800 | Sacramento, CA 95814
Follow: LinkedIn | YouTube
-----Original Appointment-----
From: Jing Yeo <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 1:07 PM
To: Jing Yeo; Hannah Goldsmith; Gia Vacin; Jessie Denver; Van Nguyen; Heather Hickerson; Heidi von Tongeln; Michelle M. Hugard
Subject: GO-Biz Concerns Re: Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item 12.A.

When: Thursday, June 4, 2026 11:00 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

Where: Microsoft Teams Meeting
________________________________________________________________________________ Microsoft Teams meeting
Join: https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/298088649380271? p=uqcSaMGddl7W62ihPJ
Meeting ID: 298 088 649 380 271
Passcode: dq7wh7Ss
Need help? | System reference
Dial in by phone
+1 310-883-7522,,119652129# United States, Santa Monica Find a local number
Phone conference ID: 119 652 129#

12.C.b
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: RE_ GO-Biz Concerns Re_ Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item 12.A. (7745 : Emergency IZO for For organizers: Meeting options | Reset dial-in PIN
________________________________________________________________________________

12.C.b
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: RE_ GO-Biz Concerns Re_ Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item 12.A. (7745 : Emergency IZO for 1 David Yakobson
From: Chris Harding <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 11:05 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; Jing Yeo; Heidi von Tongeln; Denise Anderson-Warren; Mark Harding; Tom Larmore; Casparian, Thomas; Terry O'Day
Subject: Proposed Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance Establishing Standards and Procedures for Electric Vehicle Charging of Fleet Vehicles
Attachments: CC 2026-05-26.pdf; Legal Alert.pdf

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers:

Please see the attached letter on Agenda Item 12.A on tonight’s City Council Agenda.

Sincerely,
Chris Harding
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Christopher M. Harding | Attorney at Law
1250 6th Street, Suite 200
Santa Monica, CA 90401
May 26, 2026

VIA EMAIL
Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street, Room 209
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected]
Re: Proposed Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance Establishing Standards and Procedures for Electric Vehicle Charging of Fleet Vehicles Hearing Date: May 26, 2026
Agenda Item No. 12.A
Dear Councilmembers:

This letter is submitted on behalf of SMF Property Holdings, LLC (“SMF”), owner of the two properties with EV charging facilities at 1222 and 1310 Broadway, Santa Monica. These two facilities are leased by SMF to Voltera Power and operated by Waymo. They were constructed pursuant to building permits issued by the City in 2023 approving EV charging for fleet vehicles on a 24/7 basis, with certain ancillary services specified on the City-approved plans. SMF is informed that Voltera spent in excess of $10 million constructing these facilities in reliance on their City-issued building permits. They have been operated by Waymo continuously since late 2024/early 2025.

This letter addresses the proposed Interim Zoning Ordinance (“IZO”). As this letter explains:
 The proposed IZO lacks clear use definitions distinguishing between two use categories: (1) Light Fleet-Based Service With Electric Vehicle Charging (“Fleet Service”) and (2) electric vehicle charging only (“EV charging”).  In defining the meaning of EV charging (as opposed to Fleet Service), the City must follow State EV Charging Law (Government Code Section 65850.7) and incorporate its protections including for the EV charging of fleet vehicles and activities integral to such charging.

Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 2  The proposed IZO lacks an applicability provision clarifying that it does not apply retroactively to established uses such as the EV charging use at SMF properties.

Such a provision should be added before the proposed IZO is adopted.  The Staff Report accompanying the proposed IZO overstates the City’s discretion to regulate the use of EV charging, which is strictly limited by State EV Charging Law.

THE PROPOSED IZO LACKS CLEAR DEFINITIONS OF TWO USE CATEGORIES:

FLEET SERVICE AND EV CHARGING
The proposed IZO’s definition of its new use category -- Light Fleet-Based Charging Service With Electric Vehicle Charging expressly excludes “electric vehicle charging only facilities.” (Section 2) (These two use categories are hereinafter referred to as “Fleet Service” and “EV charging”.) SMF’s problem with this key piece of the proposed IZO is two-fold:
 The proposed IZO lacks a definition of what constitutes EV charging.  The definition of Fleet Service is unclear. This definition references EV charging and then strings together a list of “in conjunction” activities preceded by the phrase “including but limited to ….” The definition does not indicate if any one of these activities is enough to push the use from EV charging to Fleet Service or whether more than one such activity necessary. Moreover, at least some of the listed activities are integral to EV charging (and other uses): “fueling” (EV charging is, itself, about fueling vehicles), “storage” (virtually all uses have some storage), and “cleaning” (which is ancillary to EV charging and virtually all other uses).

Given the law’s very different treatment of these two use categories, the proposed IZO needs clear definitions that distinguish between them. In this regard, State EV Charging Law must be considered because it places strict limits on the City’s ability to regulate EV charging.

And, as discussed below, this includes EV charging for fleet vehicles.

STATE EV CHARGING LAW GOVERNS HOW THE CITY DEFINES

EV CHARGING IN ITS PROPOSED IZO
In considering the proposed IZO and the distinction between the two use categories at issue (Fleet Service and EV charging), City Councilmembers should familiarize yourselves with State EV Charging Law and the restrictions it places on municipal regulation of EV charging facilities and uses including by charter cities like Santa Monica.

The State of California has in place strong legal protections for EV charging facilities and uses. State EV Charging Law, codified in Government Code Section 65850.7, contains findings underscoring the importance of EV charging in California and limiting the authority of municipalities to regulate it. These findings are codified in Section 65850.7(a):

Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 3 (a) “The implementation of consistent statewide standards to achieve the timely and cost-effective installation of electric vehicle charging stations … is not a municipal affair, as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution, but is instead a matter of statewide concern. Therefore, this section applies to all cities, including charter cities.” (Subsection (1))
(b) “It is the intent of the Legislature that local agencies not adopt ordinances that create unreasonable barriers to the installation of zero-emission vehicle infrastructure ….” (Subsection (2))
(c) “It is the policy of the state to promote and encourage the use of electric vehicle charging stations … and to limit obstacles to their use.” (Subsection (3)) (d) “It is the intention of the Legislature that local agencies comply not only with the language of this section, but also the legislative intent to encourage the installation of electric vehicle charging stations … so long as the action does not supersede the building official’s authority to identify and address higher priority life-safety situations.” (Subsection (4)) The California Attorney General has provided cities with guidance concerning State EV Charging Law. In a Legal Alert dated March 18, 2025 (copy attached), the Attorney General explained that State EV Charging Law does not allow cities to deny or condition approvals of EV charging stations based on a property’s zoning district: “Specifically, localities may not limit EV charging stations to commercial areas or refuse to site EV charging stations in residential zones or in locations where EV charging stations are not an allowed site use under local law.” (AG Alert, p. 4.)
The Attorney General has addressed State EV Charging Law’s treatment of EV charging for fleet vehicles. According to the Attorney General, State EV Charging Law protects EV charging for all types of vehicles including autonomous fleet vehicles. The State EV Charging Law does not distinguish between “whether the EV charging stations are for personal, public or fleet use ….” (AG Alert at p. 5.)
The AG Alert also makes it clear that when it refers to “EV charging stations,” it includes fleet operations and related uses that are “integral” to the operation of the EV charging facility. (AG Alert, p. 5) Thus, any municipal regulation addressing EV charging (including the proposed IZO) must protect EV charging and related improvements and services that are integral to EV charging including EV charging for fleet vehicles.

Finally, State EV Charging Law establishes the procedures for municipal regulation of EV charging. State law mandates a ministerial approval process for EV charging, providing:
(a) “A city, county, or city and county shall administratively approve an application to install electric vehicle charging stations through the issuance of a building permit or similar nondiscretionary permit.” (Subsection (b)1)
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 4 (b) “A city, county, or city and county may not deny an application for a use permit to install an electric vehicle charging station … unless it makes written findings based upon substantial evidence in the record that the proposed installation would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. The findings shall include the basis for the rejection of potential feasible alternatives of preventing the adverse impact.” (Subsection (c)) In other words, State EV Charging Law allows cities to require a Use Permit to impose conditions of approval if the EV charging facility could have a specific adverse impact upon the public health and safety. Moreover, State EV Charging Law requires that any such conditions of approval only if a proposed EV charging facility “shall be designed to mitigate the specific, adverse impact on the public health or safety at the lowest cost possible.” Section 65850.7(e).

State EV Charging Law does not contemplate a generic imposition of performance standards on all EV charging facilities for fleet vehicles regardless of the particular impacts on public health and safety.

THE PROPOSED IZO SHOULD BE AMENDED TO STATE THAT IT DOES NOT APPLY TO EXISTING EV CHARGING FACILITIES INCLUDING THOSE LOCATED ON SMF’S PROPERTIES The proposed IZO lacks an applicability provision, which is a key weakness in its drafting that should be corrected.

SMF submits that the proposed IZO cannot lawfully be applied to the EV charging facilities at its 1222 and 1310 Broadway properties for two reasons:

1. Because the City previously issued building permits specifically authorizing the construction and use of EV charging at these two properties for fleet vehicles on a 24/7 basis, and SMF/Voltera/Waymo have collectively invested millions of dollars in reliance on these permits, SMF, Voltera and Waymo have a fundamental vested right to operate these facilities for fleet vehicles, 24/7, notwithstanding the proposed IZO. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v.

South Coast Regional Com. 17Cal.3d 785, 791 (1976).

2. State EV Charging Law establishes the sole procedure for the City to impose project conditions on EV charging facilities. This procedure is the Use Permit procedure established in Government Code Section 65850.7. In approving the SMF facilities, the City chose not to impose project conditions. State EV Charging Law precludes the City from imposing such conditions now, via the proposed IZO.

In this regard, the building permits for SMF’s properties approved EV charging use based upon State EV Charging Law, not the City’s Zoning Ordinance. State EV Charging Law has not changed -- it continues to make EV charging (including for fleet vehicles) a permitted use in all zoning districts including in the MUBL district in Santa Monica. Thus, the proposed IZO modifying the City’s Zoning Ordinance does not affect the legal status of EV charging at SMF’s properties: it is a permitted use under State EV Charging Law.

Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 5 Moreover, in approving building permits for EV charging at SMF’s properties, the scope of the City’s approval included approval of ancillary activities that are integral to the EV charging use. (See AG Alert at p. 5) Specifically, the City-approved plans state:
“It is envisioned that this will be a 24-hour charging facility.” “These two lots are ‘spoke’ locations which means they will be used purely for EV charging. During charging there will likely be some on the spot cleaning or light maintenance of vehicle consumables (e.g., windshield wiper replacement, cleaning fluid top-off) in support of turning them around quickly, much like a traditional gasoline service station.”
“There will be around the clock security in place to protect the investment.”
Accordingly, SMF requests the City Council to, at a minimum, add an applicability provision to the proposed IZO clarifying that existing EV charging facilities constructed in accordance with permits issued pursuant to State EV Charging Law are excluded from the IZO.

THE STAFF REPORT MISREPRESENTS STATE EV CHARGING LAW AS PROTECTING THE

CONSTRUCTION OF EV FACILITIES ONLY AND NOT THEIR USE AFTER CONSTRUCTION The Staff Report, at page 4, misrepresents State EV Charging Law as protecting the construction of EV facilities and not their use after construction. The Staff Report states:
“While AB 1236 and AB970 streamline permitting for EV charging equipment itself, the law does not eliminate a city’s authority to regulate land uses and operational characteristics that are distinct from the charging equipment itself including vehicle storage, fleet operations, maintenance activities, circulation, noise, lighting, or other compatibility considerations.”
This statement is contradicted by the express purpose of State EV Charging Law, which encompasses both the construction of EV charging facilities and their use after construction.

Government Code Section 65850.7(A)(3) states: “It is the policy of the state to promote and encourage the use of electric vehicle charging stations … and to limit obstacles to their use.” (Subsection (3))
Thus, an essential legal premise of the proposed IZO -- broad municipal discretion over the use of EV charging facilities unaffected by State law -- is clearly in error. Municipal discretion over the use of EV charging facilities is, in fact, restricted by State EV Charging Law to imposing conditions of approval specifically tied to a project’s public health and safety impacts.

And such conditions must address public health or safety at the lowest cost possible.

Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 6 CONCLUSION
Based upon the foregoing, SMF requests that the City Council continue this proposed ordinance for further review and revision to address the concerns identified in this letter.

Above all, the City Council should ensure that municipal regulation affecting EV charging is aligned with State EV Charging Law and the important public policies it serves. And the proposed ordinance should expressly exclude existing EV charging uses such as those in place at SMF’s properties.

Sincerely,
Christopher M. Harding
Enclosure
cc: Oliver Chi
Jing Yeo
Heidi von Tongeln
City Clerk ([email protected])
Mark Harding
Thomas Larmore
Thomas Casparian
Voltera
Waymo
Terry O’Day
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 2 David Yakobson
From: Kenneth Kutcher <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 11:57 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: Oliver Chi; Jing Yeo; Heidi von Tongeln; Denise Anderson-Warren Subject: Agenda Item 12-A (light fleet-based EV charging stations/proposed IZO) Attachments: CC 2026.05.26.pdf; GO-Biz 2023.03.23.pdf

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
The attached letter is submitted on behalf of Voltera Power regarding Agenda Item 12-A.

Thank you.

Ken
Kenneth L. Kutcher | Attorney at Law
1250 Sixth Street, Suite 200 | Santa Monica, CA 90401
O: (310) 451-3669 | [email protected]
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) (310) 451-3669
May 26, 2026

VIA E-MAIL
Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street, Room 102
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Re: Item 12-A (light fleet-based EV charging stations/proposed IZO) Our Client: Voltera Power, LLC
Our File No.22705.001
Dear Councilmembers:

This letter is submitted on behalf of Voltera Power, LLC (“Voltera”). Voltera leases property at 1222 Broadway and 1310 Broadway (“Broadway Properties”).

Voltera has a long-term lease for the Broadway Properties. Pursuant to Building Permit Nos. 23BLD-1749 & 1750, at a cost in excess of $10 million, Voltera installed 14 dualport electric vehicle (“EV”) charging stations on each of the Broadway Properties.

Following Voltera’s completion of this installation, Certificates of Occupancy were issued by the City of Santa Monica for both of the Broadway Properties on December 31, 2024. Voltera has a customer that operates the EV charging stations for the customer’s fleet of commercial passenger vehicles, providing ride-hail services in Santa Monica.

We have read the draft emergency interim zoning ordinance (“IZO”) proposing to (1) create a new use classification for light-fleet based EV charging and (2) adopt new standards and procedures for approval of light-fleet based EV charging facilities.

As noted below, we have concerns with the Draft IZO that the City Council should address.

SECTION 9.31.165 REGARDING APPLICABILITY

SHOULD BE REVISED TO CLEARLY EXEMPT

EXISTING EV CHARGING FACILITIES
Voltera hereby requests that the IZO’s Draft Section 9.31.165(A), addressing “purpose and applicability,” be revised to add standard language making it clear that the IZO’s new light fleet-based EV charging regulations do not apply to previously approved and constructed development such as the Broadway Properties. This is a standard [email protected]
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Santa Monica City Council
May 26, 2026

exemption that is commonly adopted when changes are made to the Zoning Ordinance.

For example, see Zoning Ordinance Section 9.01.040(D)(1), which reads as follows:
§ 9.01.040 Applicability.
* * *
D. Effect on Previously Approved Projects and Projects
in Progress. The following projects shall have a vested right to proceed without complying with this Zoning
Ordinance:

1. Previously Approved Development. The erection,
construction, enlargement, demolition, moving,
conversion of, and excavation and grading for any
building or structure for which a valid permit or building permit was issued prior to the effective date of this
Zoning Ordinance and which does not subsequently
expire.

Here, as to the Broadway Properties, not only were valid building permits issued for the installation of the EV charging stations, but also the site improvements and installations were actually completed and certificates of occupancy have been issued. In addition, business licenses have been issued (and subsequently renewed as well) for the light fleet-based EV charging occurring on these sites.1 The installation and operation of those two particular EV charging stations on the Broadway Properties predate the IZO. Accordingly, the IZO should make clear that the Broadway Properties are exempt from the IZO and its attempt to regulate future light fleet-based EV charging stations.

Per the Staff Report, the IZO appears to targeted to apply to pending and future applications, not existing facilities already permitted and constructed:
1 The Zoning Review Form for Business License # 250172 for the 1310 Broadway site states in the “comments” section of the “official use only” portion:
“Electric vehicle recharging facility is a ministerially permitted use per Assembly Bill 970 and as agreed upon by Planning Staff and City Attorney’s office.” Similarly, the Zoning Review Form for Business License # 250243 for the 1222 Broadway site states in the “comments” section of the “official use only” portion: “Use is permitted by-right per State law.”
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Santa Monica City Council
May 26, 2026

“At least one application for a light fleet-based service with electrical charging located in close proximity to residential neighborhoods is pending. Staff has determined that without operating conditions this facility will result in specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety.”
(Staff Report, p. 2.)

THE IZO IS AN ATTEMPTED END-RUN ON STATE LAW THAT

PREEMPTS LOCAL ZONING AS TO EV CHARGING,

INCLUDING FOR FLEET VEHICLES
As to local zoning, Assembly Bills 1236 and 970 expressly preempt local zoning regulations as to EV charging stations, including in charter cities such as Santa Monica.

In this regard, Government Code Section 65850.7(a)2 states:

The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1) The implementation of consistent statewide standards to achieve the timely and cost-effective installation of electric vehicle charging stations and hydrogen-fueling stations is not a municipal affair, as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution, but is instead a matter of statewide concern. Therefore, this section applies to all cities, including charter cities.
(2) It is the intent of the Legislature that local agencies not adopt ordinances that create unreasonable barriers to the installation of zero-emission vehicle infrastructure and not unreasonably restrict the ability of . . . business concerns to install electric vehicle charging and hydrogen-fueling stations. (3) It is the policy of the state to promote and encourage the use of electric vehicle charging stations and hydrogen-fueling stations and to limit obstacles to their use.
(4) It is the intent of the Legislature that local agencies comply not only with the language of this section, but also the legislative intent to encourage the installation of electric vehicle charging stations and hydrogen-fueling stations by removing obstacles to, and minimizing costs of, permitting for charging and 2 See also Cal. Atty Gen. Legal Alert No. OAG 2025-01 as to Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permit Streamlining Requirements (Mar. 18, 2025) p. 2 (“These state laws thus apply to all local governments, including charter cities, and preempt local laws and ordinances that conflict with them.”).

Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Santa Monica City Council
May 26, 2026

hydrogen-fueling stations so long as the action does not supersede the building official’s authority to identify and address higher priority life-safety situations.
(Emphasis added.)
Among other things, the Draft IZO purports to attempt to limit the zoning districts where “light fleet-based service with electric vehicle charging” may occur. (See Draft IZO, Section 9.31.165(B).3) However, per the California Attorney General:
“[Government Code] Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71 apply
to EV charging station permit applications even if local zoning laws do not specifically list—or even if they expressly prohibit—EV charging stations as an allowed site use.” (Cal.

Atty Gen. Legal Alert No. AG 2025-01, supra at p. 4
(emphasis added).)
Moreover, the Attorney General has made it clear: “Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71 do not permit localities to condition approval based on the type of proposed EV charging stations installation.” (Id. at p. 5 (emphasis added).) Indeed, the Attorney General has identified “significant and common compliance issues” occurring in certain localities, including:
“Applying local zoning regulations to EV charging station permit application review even though local zoning
regulations are preempted under the charging streamlining laws.” (Id. at p. 2.)
When I was representing EdgeConneX in the permitting process for the Broadway Properties, City Planning Staff took the position that the proposed use of these properties was a Light Fleet-Based Service (see Zoning Ordinance § 9.51.030(D)(6)) and was therefore prohibited in the Mixed-Use Boulevard Low (“MUBL”) Zoning District on Broadway. We disagreed and convinced the City Manager and Planning Director otherwise. Once AB 1236 and 970 took effect in cities of less than 200,000 population, we asserted the right to streamlined processing of these 3 Draft Section 9.31.165(B) reads: “Light Fleet-Based Service with Electric Vehicle Charging shall [only] be permitted in the General Commercial (GC), Industrial Conservation (IC), and Transit Adjacent (TA) Zoning Districts.” By contrast, a hydrogen fueling station can generally be limited to properties zoned for industrial or commercial development. (See Gov’t Code § 65850.7(b)(2)(A).)
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Santa Monica City Council
May 26, 2026

applications. The City resisted. I then wrote to the California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (“GO-Biz”). A copy of my letter is enclosed. GOBiz agreed that the then-proposed use falls within the protections of AB 1236 and 970.4 It was only after GO-Biz discussed this with City Staff that the City agreed it would process the streamlined applications for these two private fleet EV charging stations on the Broadway Properties regardless of their MUBL zoning.

In summary, the City has no right under State law to prohibit fleet-based EV charging in any zoning district whatsoever. Accordingly, the purported zoning district limitations of IZO Section 9.31.165(B) for fleet EV charging locations must be eliminated to comply with State law.

It should also be noted that per State law:
“Any conditions imposed on an application to install an electric vehicle charging station or hydrogen-fueling station shall be designed to mitigate the specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety at the lowest cost possible.” (Gov’t Code § 65950.7(e) (emphasis added); see also subd. (i)(1) requiring such conditions to be “cost-effective methods.”)

CONCLUSION
Voltera urges the City Council to direct City Staff to revise the IZO to make it clear that the proposed new regulations do not apply to previously approved and constructed sites that are currently under operation such as the Broadway Properties. 4 As the Attorney General confirms: “The charging streamlining laws do not distinguish between installation types—they apply to all [emphasis in original] charging station installations, regardless of whether the EV charging stations are an accessory, incidental, or primary use of a site; whether the EV charging stations are for personal, public, or fleet use; or whether the EV charging stations are for light-, medium-, or heavy-duty vehicles.” (Atty Gen. Legal Alert OAG 2025-01, supra at p. 15 (underlined emphasis added).)
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Santa Monica City Council
May 26, 2026

Voltera hereby reserves all rights to challenge the IZO to the extent that it exceeds Santa Monica’s authority to regulate the installation and operation of EV charging stations in violation of State law governing such uses.

Very truly yours,
Kenneth L. Kutcher
KLK:sna
Enclosure
cc: Oliver Chi (w/ encl.)
Jing Yeo (w/ encl.)
Heidi von Tongeln (w/ encl.)
Heather Hickerson (w/ encl.)
Hannah Goldsmith (w/ encl.)
Sloane Perras (w/ encl.)
Thomas Ashley (w/ encl.)
F:\WPDATA\22705\001 (1222, 1310 Broadway)\Cor\CC 2026.05.26.docx Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities)

(310) 451-3669
March 23, 2023

VIA E-MAIL
Heather Hickerson, Lead Advisor
Hannah Goldsmith, Counsel, Legal Affairs
Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) 1325 J Street, Suite 1800
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: 1222 and 1310 Broadway, Santa Monica
Our File No. 22705.001
Dear Mses. Hickerson and Goldsmith:

I am writing with respect to two proposed EV charging sites in Santa Monica.

I believe the City of Santa Monica may already be in contact with your office about these same sites, but Santa Monica has not responded to my inquiry about whom specifically they are speaking with. So, having read through your Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permitting Guidebook (2d ed.), I am reaching out to both of you.

My client is Voltera, an EV infrastructure provider. https://www.volterapower.com/ They have executed long-term leases for two existing paved surface parking lots at 1222 Broadway and 1310 Broadway in Santa Monica. Broadway is a commercial street, and the two properties are a few blocks outside of Downtown Santa Monica. The properties were in auto dealership auto storage use for decades and are zoned for commercial uses (including Alternative Fuels and Charging Facility by conditional use permit) or mixed-use. Both sites became available after expiration of an auto dealer lease of the properties for auto inventory storage.

Because both sites are already paved surface car dealership parking lots, they require very little change to convert to vehicle charging usage. Fourteen dual-port DC fast chargers will be installed throughout each of the two paved sites. These two new EV charging facilities will be used to serve private passenger-sized zero-emission fleet vehicles—up to 28 ZEVs on each site at any one time.

These ZEV service vehicles will be great for the environment and great for the patrons served. The sites will be used purely for EV charging and on-the-spot cleaning or quick light maintenance of vehicle consumables (e.g., windshield wiper placement, cleaning fluid top-off, etc.) in support of turning the passenger vehicles around quickly to [email protected]
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Heather Hickerson
Hannah Goldsmith
March 23, 2023

get them back on the road for hail-ride services. Any necessary storage or repairs of the zero-emission fleet vehicles will occur elsewhere at a centralized depot, not on these lots. In sum, these sites will be converted to EV charging stations and no more.

As a result, we believe the installation of the 14 charging stations on both lots clearly qualify for the ministerial approvals and streamlined processing established by AB 1236 and AB 970. We are not aware of any conceivable health or safety concerns that would be triggered by these EV charger uses.

Consistent with the State’s Guidebook, I have reached out to Santa Monica Planning Staff and have been in presubmittal discussions with City Planning, City Attorney and City Sustainability staff members to discuss how these applications will be processed by the City of Santa Monica. It is disappointing that, at least thus far, Santa Monica has been unwilling to commit to ministerially process these EV charger applications.

I would welcome the opportunity to hear your thoughts and input on any assistance you might provide in this regard to me, my client or the City of Santa Monica.

As further background I am enclosing preliminary site plans for the two sites.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Very truly yours,
Kenneth L. Kutcher
KLK:sna
Enclosures
cc: Voltera team
F:\WPDATA\22705\001 (1222, 1310 Broadway)\Cor\Hickerson, Goldsmith 2023.03.23.docx Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 1 David Yakobson
From: Hannah Goldsmith <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 5:02 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Attorney Mailbox; Clerk Mailbox; Clerk Mailbox; Gia Vacin; Jessie Denver; Jing Yeo; Heidi von Tongeln; Van Nguyen
Subject: GO-Biz Concerns Re: Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item

12.A.

Importance: High

EXTERNAL
Good afternoon,
The California Governor’s OƯice of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) just became aware of item

12.A. on tonight’s City of Santa Monica, City Council meeting agenda regarding “Introduction and Adoption of Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance Establishing Standards and Procedures for Light Fleet-Based Service with Electric Vehicle Charging.”
GO-Biz has serious concerns about this proposal moving forward, particularly regarding inconsistencies with Government Code sections 65850.7 and 65850.71, and unintended consequences for other electric vehicle charging use cases. We also have concerns with the lack of transparency of this proposal moving forward, and the amount of notice provided to the public, as this agenda item was noticed only 4 business days prior to the City Council meeting.

We would very much appreciate this item being held for vote until after we’ve had a chance to discuss with you.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Hannah
Hannah Goldsmith (she/her)
Assistant Deputy Director, Legal Affairs
office: (916) 447-7942
1325 J Street, Suite 1800 | Sacramento, CA 95814
Follow: LinkedIn | YouTube
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026
Item 12-A
May 26, 2026

12.C.c
Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Written Comments (May 26, 2026) (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 1 David Yakobson
From: Chris Harding <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 2:05 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; Jing Yeo; Heidi von Tongeln; Denise Anderson-Warren; Mark Harding; Tom Larmore; Terry O'Day
Subject: Agenda Item No. 12.C (July 14, 2026) Proposed Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance Addressing EV Charging for Autonomous Fleet Vehicles
Attachments: CC 2026-07-13.pdf; 2026.06.17 LA Times - Forced by courts, Hungtington Beach passes its overdue housing element plan.pdf; Expert Report of Terry O'Day December 2025.pdf; AG Legal Alert.pdf

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers:

Please see the attached letter on Agenda Item 12.C on tomorrow night’s City Council Agenda.

The attached letter focuses on legal issues and explains why SMF believes the proposed Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance (“EIZO”) violates State EV Charging Law. I suggest you pay particular attention to the Conclusion, which states:
“The proposed EIZO appears designed to severely restrict if not ban EV charging for autonomous fleet vehicles in Santa Monica. In addition to the serious legal problems this would create for the City, the City Council should ask if this is sound as a matter of public policy. This is a serious issue that needs thoughtful review, data, and public input (including from businesses that provide EV rideshare services and their customers), not a hysterical overreaction grounded in fear. “Autonomous rideshare services such as Waymo are essential components of a smart, green transportation strategy. Santa Monica residents and those who work and visit here have come to rely upon Waymo in particular for many of their trips.

The City Council should be looking to welcome and accommodate such rideshare services and the EV charging they require.
“As a progressive city, Santa Monica should reject the proposed EIZO as a regressive measure that impedes EV rideshare services grounded in fear and misinformation. Having adopted (mostly) a smart-growth, environmentally-sound approach to housing, the City should take a similar approach when it comes to EV rideshare fleet vehicles.”
Sincerely,
Chris Harding
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Christopher M. Harding | Attorney at Law
1250 6th Street, Suite 200
Santa Monica, CA 90401
July 13, 2026

VIA EMAIL
Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street, Room 209
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected]
Re: Proposed Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance Addressing EV Charging for Autonomous Fleet Vehicles
Hearing Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item No. 12.C
Dear Councilmembers:

This letter is submitted on behalf of SMF Property Holdings, LLC (“SMF”), owner of the two properties with EV charging facilities at 1222 and 1310 Broadway, Santa Monica. These two facilities are leased by SMF to Voltera Power and operated by Waymo. They were constructed pursuant to building permits issued by the City in 2023 approving EV charging for autonomous fleet vehicles on a 24/7 basis, with certain ancillary services specified on the City-approved plans. SMF is informed that Voltera spent in excess of $10 million constructing these facilities in reliance on their City-issued building permits. These facilities have been operated by Waymo continuously since early 2025.

The proposed Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance (“EIZO”) asks the City Council to embrace a new role as the Huntington Beach of EV charging for autonomous fleet vehicles. (See attached Huntington Beach article.) The propose EIZO, if adopted, would place the City in conflict with State EV Charging Law (Government Code Section 65850.7(a)) and the California Attorney General’s Legal Alert dated March 18, 2025 placing cities on notice as to State EV Charging Law’s restrictions on municipal regulation of EV charging. If the City Council adopts the proposed EIZO as submitted, you will be inviting litigation and risking substantial financial exposure at a time when the City is struggling to recover financially.

Notably absent from the EIZO is a recital acknowledging the enormous environmental benefits of electricity-powered autonomous fleet vehicles, as well as regulatory provisions that facilitate and encourage the charging of such vehicles. To the contrary, the EIZO is clearly designed to impede EV charging for autonomous fleet vehicles.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Santa Monica City Council
July 13, 2026

The proposed EIZO is a revised version of an IZO calendared for City Council consideration on May 26th. The prior IZO was pulled from your May 26th agenda in response to communications from the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (“GOBiz”). The Staff Report indicates the revised EIZO addresses GO-Biz’s objections. SMF disagrees.

As explained below, the EIZO contains the same legal flaws as the prior proposed IZO.1

STATE EV CHARGING LAW
Our prior (May 26th) letter explained State EV Charging Law and its restrictions on municipal regulation of EV charging. The new Staff Report essentially ignores these restrictions, treating them as irrelevant to the newly-defined zoning/land use category: “Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles” (which appears to include all EV charging of autonomous fleet vehicles regardless of the actual activities occurring on-site).

But these State law restrictions on municipal regulation are pivotal here, and they preempt the proposed EIZO insofar as it attempts to evade State law’s protections for EV charging of autonomous fleet vehicles.

In particular:
 Cities May Not Restrict the Location of EV Charging. As the Attorney General explained: “Specifically, localities may not limit EV charging stations to commercial areas or refuse to site EV charging stations in residential zones or in locations where EV charging stations are not an allowed site use under local law.” (AG Alert at p.4)  Cities May Not Discriminate Against Autonomous Fleet Vehicles. According to the Attorney General, State EV Charging Law protects EV charging for all types of vehicles including autonomous fleet vehicles. The State EV Charging Law does not distinguish between “whether the EV charging stations are for personal, public or fleet use ….” (AG Alert at p.5)  Cities Must Allow EV Charging Facilities and Services Integral to EV Charging. The AG Alert also makes it clear that when it refers to “EV charging stations,” it includes related improvements and services that are “integral” to the operations of the EV charging facility. (AG Alert at p. 5) Thus, any municipal regulation addressing EV charging (including the proposed EIZO) must protect EV charging and related improvements and services that are integral to EV charging including EV charging for autonomous fleet vehicles. 1 The Staff Report fails to indicate that GO-Biz has had an opportunity to review the EIZO and provide comments.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Santa Monica City Council
July 13, 2026

THE PROPOSED EIZO VIOLATES STATE EV CHARGING LAW
The proposed EIZO conflicts with State EV charging law in at least two respects: (1) it seeks to define away State law’s protections for fleet vehicle EV charging by purporting to reclassify such charging as “Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles” regardless of whether more than EV charging is involved; and (2) it seeks to impose both geographic and operational standards on EV charging for autonomous fleet vehicles that are incompatible with State law.

A. The Proposed EIZO’s Definition of “Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles” Violates State EV Charging Law.

The proposed EIZO attempts to evade State law’s protections for fleet vehicle EV charging through definitional “sleight-of-hand.” It does so by creating a new use category (“Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles”), defines it capaciously to be virtually allinclusive, and then treats this new use category as unprotected by State EV Charging Law.

This new use category includes any of the following activities associated with fleet vehicles: “parking, dispatching, storage, fueling, cleaning, software servicing, vehicles maintenance and servicing ….” This list is preceded by the phrase, “including but not limited to ….” Notably, the definition does not indicate whether one or more of these activities is necessary to constitute this new use.

This definition expressly excludes EV charging only. However, the EIZO’s recitals assume that EV charging for autonomous fleet vehicles cannot constitute EV charging only. Thus, EV charging for such fleet vehicles can never be exempt from the EIZO’s requirements.

This core feature of the EIZO cannot be reconciled with State EV Charging Law, which as the Attorney General has recognized protects EV charging for fleet vehicles and activities integral to EV charging. The City cannot define away these State law protections in its Zoning Ordinance.

To address this legal deficiency in the EIZO, and bring it into compliance with State EV Charging Law (as explained by the Attorney General), the EIZO should be amended to include the following definition of “EV charging only”: “EV charging only includes EV charging and any services and facilities integral to EV charging. EV charging only includes such charging for all types of vehicles including autonomous fleet vehicles.” Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Santa Monica City Council
July 13, 2026

B. The Proposed EIZO Includes Geographic and Other Restrictions that Violate State EV Charging Law.

The proposed EIZO seeks to impose onerous (arguably prohibitive) geographic and other restrictions on EV charging for autonomous fleet vehicles that are incompatible with State EV Charging Law.

In particular, the proposed EIZO would limit EV charging of autonomous fleet vehicles to a small portion of the City only: the Industrial Conservation (“IC”), General Commercial (“GC”), and Transit Adjacent (“TA”) districts. These geographic restrictions violate EV Charging Law’s protections for EV charging in all zoning districts. (AG Alert at p. 4) In addition to the geographic restrictions, the EIZO includes a series of operational standards untethered to the limits imposed by State EV Charging Law. Under State EV Charging Law, such limits must be tied to specific adverse public health or safety (not welfare) impacts and constitute the least costly alternative. (Government Code Section 65850.7(a)(i)(1))2 The EIZO makes no attempt to meet this State law requirement, apparently based upon its fictional premise that EV charging of autonomous fleet vehicles is not protected by State EV Charging Law.

SMF is particularly concerned with the EIZO insofar as it looks to restrict nighttime hours of operation. EV charging expert (and former Councilmember) Terry O’Day prepared a report last December (copy attached) indicating that nighttime charging is essential to EV charging’s viability.3
THE PROPOSED EIZO CANNOT BE APPLIED TO SMF’S PROPERTIES The proposed EIZO and Staff Report ignore SMF’s prior (May 26th) request for a clear “non-retroactive” applicability provision confirming that the IZO does not apply to the existing EV charging facilities at 1222 and 1310 Broadway. Thus, SMF renews our request for such a provision.

As we explained before, the proposed EIZO cannot lawfully be applied to the EV charging facilities at SMF’s properties for two reasons:
2 Government Code Section 65850.7(i)(5) defines “specific adverse impact” as a significant, quantifiable, direct and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified and written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.
3 This letter does not address these operational standards in depth because they apply to new permit applications, not existing uses like the EV charging at SMF’s properties.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Santa Monica City Council
July 13, 2026

1. Because the City previously issued building permits specifically authorizing the construction and use of EV charging (and related services) at these two properties for fleet vehicles on a 24/7 basis, and SMF/Voltera/Waymo have collectively invested millions of dollars in reliance on these permits, SMF, Voltera and Waymo have a fundamental vested right to operate these facilities for autonomous fleet vehicles, 24/7, notwithstanding the proposed EIZO. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional Com. 17 Cal.3d 785, 791 (1976).

2. State EV Charging Law establishes the sole procedure for the City to impose project conditions on EV charging facilities. This procedure is the Use Permit procedure established in Government Code Section 65850.7. In approving the SMF facilities, the City chose not to impose project conditions. State EV Charging Law precludes the City from imposing such conditions now, via the proposed EIZO.4
In this regard, the building permits for SMF’s properties approved EV charging use based upon State EV Charging Law, not the City’s Zoning Ordinance. State EV Charging Law has not changed -- it continues to make EV charging (including for autonomous fleet vehicles) a permitted use in all zoning districts including in the MUBL district where SMF’s properties are located. Thus, the proposed EIZO modifying the City’s Zoning Ordinance does not negate the legal status of EV charging at SMF’s properties: it is a permitted use under State EV Charging Law.5

CONCLUSION
The proposed EIZO appears designed to severely restrict if not ban EV charging for autonomous fleet vehicles in Santa Monica. In addition to the serious legal problems this would create for the City, the City Council should ask if this is sound as a matter of public policy. This is a serious issue that needs thoughtful review, data, and public input (including from businesses that provide EV rideshare services and their customers), not a hysterical overreaction grounded in fear.

Autonomous rideshare services such as Waymo are essential components of a smart, green transportation strategy. Santa Monica residents and those who work and visit here have come to rely upon Waymo in particular for many of their trips. The City Council should be 4 State EV Charging Law specifically limits conditions based on the standards, policies or conditions “as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.” (Government Code Section 65850.7(i)(5)) For SMF’s properties, the applications were deemed complete about 3 years ago, thus precluding application of the EIZO standards to SMF’s properties. 5 It would violate State EV Charging Law for the City to treat the existing EV charging use at 1222 and 1310 Broadway as a nonconforming use rather than a permitted use subject to the Zoning Ordinance’s restrictions on nonconforming uses because EV charging at these sites was approved pursuant to State EV Charging Law (not the Zoning Ordinance).

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Santa Monica City Council
July 13, 2026

looking to welcome and accommodate such rideshare services and the EV charging they require.

As a progressive city, Santa Monica should reject the proposed EIZO as a regressive measure that impedes EV rideshare services grounded in fear and misinformation. Having adopted (mostly) a smart-growth, environmentally-sound approach to housing, the City should take a similar approach when it comes to EV rideshare fleet vehicles.

Sincerely,
Christopher M. Harding
Enclosures
cc: Oliver Chi
Jing Yeo
Heidi von Tongeln
City Clerk ([email protected])
Mark Harding
Thomas Larmore
Voltera
Waymo
Terry O’Day
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities)













 

 





!
"#$%&
'$(
(

!
)#$!
%$
!*

$
+%,
%,
*%-##

"$%& ($
'$(
(-%,
,
!
(!- %,
!
,!##

$%
$% .
/-%$%&!%
01(
!$1$#
*!,
! 2

(!- $%&
#+%
-2,
!%
3- ,

%$&(.
4567589:;66<8=;>? @ABCDE;FG;CAHBIJ:;KHLIMLNIAL;ODPCQ;RPJJDJ;MIJ;ASDBEHD;QAHJMLN;DTDUDLI;RTPL;V;WAJ;>LNDTDJ;XMUDJ QIRJ<55YYYZTPIMUDJZCAU5JACPT5EPMTGVRMTAI5LDYJ5JIABG58[89V[9V645\ABCDEVFGVCAHBIJVQHLIMLNIALVFDPCQVRPJJDJVMIJVASDBEHDVQAHJMLNVDTDUDLIVRTPL 659 Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities)







 


 

 




 







!





 

"
#
!$







 


%
" 


&



 '(




)









*




* (

+ 
,%
- 
'%


.

.
/*

$ 0







1








.






















.*


 


2
) +


 






$

34
456
 





 (

+ 
,%









73



78 2




 






74





$




 







  




% "

( 






 


9


1
!1  : 


 



+


 


 ;3<7
777





;7
777


=

 








  =





 
 


>?@A?BCDE@@FBGEHI JKLMNOEPQEMKRLSTDEURVSWVXSKVEYNZM[E\ZTTNTEWSTEK]NLORNE[KRTWVXEN^N_NVSE\^ZVE`EaKTEHVXN^NTEbW_NT [S\TF??cccd^ZSW_NTdMK_?TKMZ^?OZW^Q`\W^KS?VNcT?TSKLQ?BeBC`eC`@>?fKLMNO`PQ`MKRLST`[RVSWVXSKV`PNZM[`\ZTTNT`WST`K]NLORN`[KRTWVX`N^N_NVS`\^ZV B?C Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities)























  






 









  
 


 

 


 




 


 




 


 




 





 









!

 





  








 










 

 " 




  

 




 

 


#$%&$'()*%%+',*-. /01234*56*207189)*:7;8<;=80;*>3?2@*A?9939*<89*0B31473*@079<;=*3C3D3;8*AC?;*E*F09*-;=3C39*G<D39 @8A9+$$HHHIC?8<D39I20D$902?C$4?<C6EA<C08$;3H9$98016$'J'(EJ(E%#$K01234E56E207189E@7;8<;=80;E53?2@EA?9939E<89E0B31473E@079<;=E3C3D3;8EAC?; &$( Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities)











 




 












 



!
"






# 



 




$% 

#&'



 









(


  
  





'




$ )


*

 
+
,)-.


#
 
$/

  
 





0


 






1  




 

% 











)
 2

     
 3



 




,)-.+



4567589:;66<8=;>? @ABCDE;FG;CAHBIJ:;KHLIMLNIAL;ODPCQ;RPJJDJ;MIJ;ASDBEHD;QAHJMLN;DTDUDLI;RTPL;V;WAJ;>LNDTDJ;XMUDJ QIRJ<55YYYZTPIMUDJZCAU5JACPT5EPMTGVRMTAI5LDYJ5JIABG58[89V[9V645\ABCDEVFGVCAHBIJVQHLIMLNIALVFDPCQVRPJJDJVMIJVASDBEHDVQAHJMLNVDTDUDLIVRTPL =59 Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities)


 




 
 



  

 

 




 













  
 




  
 



!"
  


 




#



 

 
 

$%








 
 




! &  



'(











 




 

! )*









 


 

'



 +

 
!),





!-


  
 
  !+ (




 .#







/



!




 





' 

 
 

 
  








 
 
 


   
 ! 


*



 

 

  
  



 



 
  


     
 


 0
 ! )*  $



$ 
  


 









 

  



 
 
+*

!)* 





 


 
 








 



!+ 1223456327468439:3;<7:=63>9?:4@3A<9B3;<7:=63>9?:4@C D7443EF7G9 HIJKILMNOJJPLQORS TUVWXYOZ[OWU\V]^NO_\`]a`b]U`OcXdWeOfd^^X^Oa]^OUgXVY\XOeU\^a`bOXhXiX`]Ofhd`OjOkU^OR`bXhX^OlaiX^ e]f^PIImmmnhd]aiX^nWUiI^UWdhIYdah[jfahU]I`Xm^I^]UV[ILoLMjoMjJHIpUVWXYjZ[jWU\V]^je\`]a`b]U`jZXdWejfd^^X^ja]^jUgXVY\XjeU\^a`bjXhXiX`]jfhd` qIM Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities)








































 !
"


#$


$$%
!


&''(




"










$
 )*+,*-./0++1-2034 56789:0;<086=7>?/0@=A>BAC>6A0D9E8F0GE??9?0B>?06H97:=90F6=?BAC09I9J9A>0GIEA0K0L6?03AC9I9?0MBJ9? F>G?1**NNNOIE>BJ9?O86J*?68EI*:EBI<KGBI6>*A9N?*?>67<*-P-.KP.K+)*Q6789:K;<K86=7>?KF=A>BAC>6AK;9E8FKGE??9?KB>?K6H97:=9KF6=?BACK9I9J9A>KGIEA .*.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) EXPERT REPORT OF TERRY O’DAY
Mayor Pro Tempore 2012-2014 and 2018-2020.

Councilmember December 2009 to December 2020
Planning Commission Chair 2008-2009
Planning Commissioner 2003-2009
Founder of 5 EV charging companies since 1996
Neighborhood resident since 1998
Regarding the EV Charging Facilities
Serving Waymo at 1222 & 1310 Broadway
(Broadway & Euclid), Santa Monica, CA
Submitted to the City of Santa Monica
for City Council’s consideration of facility operations December 8, 2025
Prepared at the request of the landowner, SMF Property Holdings Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 2 I. Executive Summary
This expert report provides independent planning and EV infrastructure analysis to inform City Council deliberations on the operation of the Waymo fleet-charging facilities at 1222 and 1310 Broadway and its impacts on neighbors. It recommends continued nighttime charging (24/7 operations) with mitigations designed to meaningfully reduce noise, light, and circulation impacts on neighbors while maintaining lawful, permitted use consistent with City policy and State law.

Neighbors adjacent to the Broadway sites have reported sleep disruption from beeping and humming, intrusive light from vehicles and equipment, and queuing within the alley that can feel unpredictable and stressful late at night. These experiences deserve prompt, durable remedies.

The recommendations below focus on physical buffers, quiet-hours practices, lighting controls, and street access improvements that address the disturbancesresidents report (sound, light, and circulation at sensitive hours). In addition to finding that there are neighboring residents who have concerns that merit action, the report finds that economic impacts on the charging and vehicle operators from a proposed shutdown overnight are overly-broad and carry significant harms that are avoidable in a balanced resolution.

Mitigated 24/7 operations make sense and balance the interests effectively. The City’s Land Use & Circulation Element (LUCE) and Electric Vehicle Action Plan (EVAP) emphasize integrated land use and transportation, emission reductions, and expanded EV charging infrastructure to decarbonize trips that still require vehicles while safeguarding neighborhood quality of life.

Permits issued in October 2023 contemplate 24/7 operations, and California’s Gov. Code § 65850.7 requires administrative approval of EV charging unless there is a “finding, based on substantial evidence, that the electric vehicle charging station . . . could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety.” Continuing overnight charging with voluntary adoption of specific site-level mitigation measures that are agreed upon by all of the stakeholders advances City policy and reduces neighborhood impacts—especially the Euclid ingress/egress curb cut and noise/light screening.

Despite the difficult position the city faces, having already authorized 24/7 operation and being prohibited by state law in modifying, a balanced solution appears within reach because the operators have made proposals to the city that achieve a great deal of what is needed. In fact, some operational modifications have already been made and the stakeholders have indicated in recent correspondence now before the Council that they are willing to make additional operational modifications.

Recommendation to City Council
Direct City staff to negotiate and enter into a durable agreement with the operators that recognizes the operators’ legal rights to operate on a 24/7 basis, but mandates implementation of the operational changes and completion of the physical improvements offered in the November 26, 2025 letter from the operators with the modifications recommended herein.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 3 Recommended Site Modifications and Operational Controls • Continue in-place operational quiet-hours controls
o Ensure no vacuuming or use of power tools 11 pm–6 am; o Maintain reduced reverse-alert tones now provided voluntarily by Waymo; • Implement additional operational quiet-hours controls o Minimize parked-vehicle light cycling of headlights and blinking hazard lights; o Remove or disable lighting effects from charging stations that are not operationally required
• Implement additional physical screening and light control o Install opaque fencing wraps on the property borders at the southern property borders, and if insufficient,
o Install mature, dense and tall vegetation at the southern property borders and alleys, and if insufficient,
o Dim or shield ambient lighting spillover onto adjacent lots, and if insufficient, o Install additional awnings/canopies and/or masonry walls with absorptive liners at residential interfaces of sufficient height to screen the immediately adjacent multifamily housing across the alleys (subject to utility easements and other legal restrictions).
• Implement circulation changes
o Remove the one-way orientation of 12th Court during nighttime hours to allow vehicles to enter the lot from Boadway and avoid driving the length of 12th Court at night.
o Investigate and if feasible establish a Euclid Street ingress/egress for the western lot, which is authorized under SMMC § 9.28.120(B)(3)(c). ▪ Note: this will take time to implement; Council should direct staff to swiftly complete the steps (design review, permits, and Public Works coordination) necessary to expedite this improvement.
o Euclid Street ingress/egress may help the eastern lot also but is a lower priority than the western lot due to the immediate impacts to the west. • Facilitate communication
o Adopt a procedure such that if a specific, adverse impact is identified in the future, how the parties will work together to address it
These actions directly target the sources of disturbance that neighbors have described, reduce Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 4 late-night impacts, and keep charging available in a manner consistent with the City’s EVAP and LUCE frameworks. They achieve a balance of interests that permit the station owners to operate under an economically viable set of conditions. They require capital investment on behalf of the operators in exchange for continuing to enjoy the economic benefits of ongoing operations that the city has already granted, in compliance with state law.

II. Author Credentials and Relevant Experience
I served on the City of Santa Monica Planning Commission beginning in 2003 and was elected Chair in 2008, serving through August 2009 during the community's multi-year effort to produce the City's Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE), adopted in 2010 and in effect today. I subsequently served on the Santa Monica City Council from December 2009 to December 2020, including terms as Mayor Pro Tempore in 2012-2014 and 2018-2020.

Professionally, I am Founder and Chief Operating Officer of lnCharge Energy, a fleet-focused EV charging provider that develops, builds, and operates charging solutions nationwide. I was on the founding team of EVgo, the nation's largest public DC fast-charging network, and I began my career in 1996 as an analyst at Edison EV working with early EV charging operations. I also cofounded Move LA; our coalition-building contributed to the success of Measure R, a breakthrough regional initiative that united business, labor, environmental, and civic leaders to fund transformative mobility investments. I provided expert advice in development of California’s groundbreaking EV charging streamlining laws (Gov. Code § 65850.7 and AB 970).

I have prepared this report at the request of SMF Property Holdings, the landowner of the subject properties as an expert in urban planning, City of Santa Monica policy, and EV infrastructure design/operations (not electrical engineering), at a customary expert consultant rate. My current company has developed and operated charging sites for Waymo and other autonomous operators (Cruise, Motional, Zoox), and for fleets such as FedEx, General Motors, PepsiCo, municipalities, and public school districts. I have not been compensated by Voltera or Waymo.

Beginning in 1998 until August 2025 I lived in Santa Monica no more than seven blocks from the Broadway lots. Since 2004, that has been at 1753 Euclid Street, just three blocks away. I continue to own that home. This personal residence is across the I-10 freeway from the Broadway lots and is not directly affected by noise and light from the facilities; however, this area is very much part of my neighborhood, and I first moved here in 1998 on 17th Street. My family frequents the adjacent Euclid park, and I have had immediate family members attend the grade school across the street.

III. Purpose and Scope
In this report, I provide professional opinions regarding the design, siting, and operation of the EV charging facilities at 1222 and 1310 Broadway, developed by Voltera for Waymo's Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 5 autonomous vehicle fleet, and the suitability of continued 24/7 operations in accordance with their City-issued permits with targeted mitigations that address neighborhood concerns while maintaining alignment with City policy and State law. I detail my process, findings, and recommendations.

This report incorporates consideration of the materials listed below, as well as my own site visits and knowledge of the neighborhood, in which I have lived since 1998.

IV. Methodology
This report attempts to capture all the publicly available correspondence about site operations at the subject properties as well as governing documents and laws. I have made multiple site visits over the last 18 months1 and have personal knowledge as a neighborhood resident. Where possible, I sought to examine data. I acknowledge, however, that this is a fast-moving public deliberation and at the time I began a complete study, the City had already initiated the threat of litigation. As such, I moved as quickly as possible to provide a comprehensive analysis from my perspective to promote dialogue.

Materials Relied Upon
o City letters (Sept. 9, 2025, Nov. 19, 2025)
o Waymo counsel letter (Nov. 25, 2025) and Joint proposal letter (Nov. 26, 2025) o LUCE (Executive Summary and City statements on LUCE process and intent) o Santa Monica Zoning Code Ch. 9.11 (MUBL purpose) and City planning resources o Gov. Code § 65850.7 and AB 970 streamlining guides/fact sheets o Public reporting on City directives and community concerns (e.g., KTLA, Santa Monica Daily Press)
o Professional experience and site visits as described
o Publicly available correspondence from neighbors to City officials as provided by California Public Records Act requests
1 My site visits included the time during construction and observations were made from the street, park and alleys.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 6 V. Findings and Observations
A. Site Background and Condition
The Broadway properties have been commercial in character, including prior use as inventory parking for an automobile dealership. In this use, the lots have experienced significant daytime operations, including parking with greater density and significantly more vehicles accommodated on the lot at a time. The transition to commercial fleet charging stations resulted in fewer vehicles and fewer staff, but significantly more trips and round-the-clock operation.

In my professional judgment, the stations are well-constructed and generally well-managed.

Compared to fleet charging stations nationwide, these are well lit, clean, operating reliably, and highly utilized. The stations operate particularly near one apartment building to the west, and the western site utilizes the alley to a significant degree.

Lot access is provided for both lots from their respective alleys, despite being bisected by Euclid Street. The eastern alley (Euclid Court) is mostly commercial and includes Euclid Park, a school, a pet hospital, a paint and body shop, other office and automotive uses and four or five apartment buildings. The western alley (12th Court) is mostly residential and includes apartment buildings, some offices and commercial. Nearly all the apartments were built mid-century, and many do not have central air conditioning.
12th Court appears to have the most significant conflicts with neighboring uses. 1208 Broadway and 1507 12th Street are closest to the stations. The proximity of operations to these buildings is uncommon in the charging industry, but not unique, as I address later in this report in comparison with stations in other jurisdictions.

The properties have one owner, SMF Property Holdings. The one developer and charging station operator, Voltera, leases the properties. The vehicle operator, Waymo is the customer of Voltera. Southern California Edison provides electric service.

B. Economic Model
The economic model for these stations relies on high utilization (also referred to as throughput).

Capital investment in the property is well above $10 million and includes site development, paving, boundary fences, landscaping, lighting, canopies, electrical infrastructure, and charging equipment. Operating costs include utilities, software, maintenance, staffing, and rent. All improvements were made after the City issued permits for the 24/7 operation of these facilities.

The vehicle operator (Waymo) is the customer of the developer and operator of the charging stations, Voltera. Voltera pays a leasing fee to SMF Property Holdings, the landowner.2 The facility operating expenses are mostly fixed. In addition to capital recovery, the fixed 2 In full transparency, I do not have access to any proprietary information about the economic relationship between the parties of Waymo, Voltera and SMF Property Holdings. My comments are limited to my understanding of industry practices and conventions, having personally developed and operated over 10,000 charging sites of various types in North America since 1996. Financial data provided are estimates based on my professional experience.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 7 expenses include staffing, maintenance, rent, software, and utility demand charges. The variable cost of electricity is not as significant as most people would believe. This is due to commercial utility tariff structures. Essentially, there are two components to a commercial electric bill. The first is the variable rate; it is the amount of “fuel” that is consumed. It is measured as volume as kilowatt hours (kWh) and can be understood as how much power (kW) is delivered over how long a period (hours). If this were your water faucet, imagine kWh as how much water flowed through your faucet to fill the bucket, and it is the result of how long you left the faucet running. The second is a peak power charge, or demand charge. This fee comprises most of a typical highpower charging station’s electricity bill and is set by the maximum energy drawn by the facility during any 15-minute interval in a month. In the water faucet metaphor, this is based on how big your faucet is and if you ever turned it all the way open. One peak energy event will set the monthly demand charge in some jurisdictions for the entire year. Station owners go to great lengths to limit these charges. For intermittent charging, like a public charging station, this cost is typically the primary operating expense, sometimes higher than capital recovery.

Due to the fixed cost structure of a charging station, high utilization is needed to maximize capital efficiency of the site.

Essentially, it amortizes this expense across more charging events.

Unlike in your home, a commercial charging station without subsidies would typically cost more than fueling your gasolinepowered vehicle. To be competitive with gasoline, the name of the game is utilization.

Autonomous vehicle fleets optimize the fixed capital and operating expenses of charging stations by achieving utilization rates that are not attainable through typical vehicle operation. In many cases, including the Broadway properties, utilization of the charging stations well exceeds 90% of all available hours. In other words, during a 24-hour period vehicles will be plugged into a charger and actively drawing electricity for more than 22 hours. With as many as 20 vehicles charging per day, one can imagine this provides for very brief transitions between charge events.

Such high-demand sites enable electric vehicles to compete with fossil fuel vehicles on cost, which is critical to achieving the policy goals of deploying electric vehicles and reducing emissions of localized pollutants and global-warming pollution. Station operators are betting on a future with more vehicles in operation, higher utilization, and economic viability. Waymo, as a start-up operator deploying groundbreaking new technology, is working to achieve sustainable uniteconomics of its operations to demonstrate the ability to scale its model globally, displacing both private vehicle ownership and gasoline. The subject sites are a key component of its early deployment and the success of EVs in autonomous vehicle fleets. It is important to note that autonomous vehicle technology is not inherently electric. Fleet operators can easily choose gasoline fueling, obviating many of the important potential benefits of this technology. In fact, the first Waymo vehicles were gasoline-powered and were operated for years during the research and development phase of the company.

In my estimation, fixed operating costs for the facility – rent, capital recovery, maintenance, and demand charges comprise more than 90% of the total operating expenses.

The cost structure of
high-power charging
stations is typically >90%
fixed costs.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 8 C. Impact of the City’s Demand to Eliminate Nighttime Operations Given this context, it is easy to understand the source of concern for the vehicle and charging operators. Closing EV charging operations from 11:00 pm to 6:00 am as proposed by the City reduces total operating time by roughly 30%. This creates serious adverse economic and environmental effects. In simple terms, that is 30% less revenue to cover those fixed expenses.

That almost certainly makes the stations unviable.

For two reasons, the operators only have limited control over market prices that they charge for their services. First, gasoline is a viable substitute for electric fuel. As described, nonresidential EV charging is only marginally competitive with gasoline fueling on price. Second, rideshare markets are now mature, with Uber and Lyft dominating pricing. Waymo cannot exceed prices for these substitutes.

Turning this station’s economics upside down has effects that would negatively impact the global deployment of EVs in autonomous fleets. Waymo is the far-and-away leader in the category, and it is still in an early proof-of-deployment period. Upending the unit economics and ability to scale with EVs disrupts the long-term potential of the technology.

Without a doubt, all parties involved have significant interest in getting the local operations right in Santa Monica. The lessons provided on these sites are valuable – including operating economics, siting and design, permitting, and importantly how to operate successfully in communities, especially when adjacent to residences. Success must include contributing positively to neighborhood wellbeing and vitality if the technology is going to scale. As I will examine in later sections, the City also has a strong stated policy interest in the success of these operations.

D. Comparison With Other Fueling Sites
Not far from the Broadway stations, Tesla and Electrify America operate public charging stations of a similar scale. Indeed, mid-city is the home to many of Santa Monica’s charging stations.

These sites provide an especially important service for local renters, who find their residential charging options limited.

The Tesla public charging site at 14th and Santa Monica Boulevard is two blocks away, covers two lots, like the Broadway stations, bisected by an alley, with 64 charging stations. It has little-to-no vegetation onsite but incorporates many other elements visible at the Broadway stations, such as ambient lighting and large solar canopies. The site operates unattended 24/7 drawing public users and is equally proximate to multifamily residences.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 9 The Electrify America public charging site at 18th and Santa Monica Blvd. is six blocks from the Broadway sites, with 20 charging stations. It has more vegetation than Tesla’s station, but significantly less than the Broadway sites. Each of the chargers has nighttime lighting in neon green that is used for marketing purposes and is far brighter than the Broadway chargers.

Significant ambient lighting at nighttime
The 20-station
Electrify America.
public charging
station six black
away is brightly lit
at night, including
branded lights on
each charger.

Multifamily on the northside
of Tesla lot with solar
canopies and 64 stations
Multifamily - northside
of Electrify America lot
The 64-station Tesla
public charging site two
blocks away at 14th and
Santa Monica Blvd. is
equally proximate to
multifamily housing and
operates 24/7 with
minimal controversy.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 10 In today’s market, these public charging stations are far more common. EVgo operates multiple similar sites in Santa Monica, clustered downtown, and Tesla has one other large site in the Pico Neighborhood. Public stations have similar lighting impacts, similar egress/ingress volume, but different impacts associated with noise. By offering public access, public sites contend with driver behavior that can range from smoking to loud talking or fighting, loud music, trash accumulation, and vehicle abandonment. They are typically unattended so can also produce impacts associated with vagrancy and property crime. Still, these sites are far less active overnight because most drivers are at home asleep.

FINDING: Although the Broadway sites have significantly greater nighttime activity, the presence of staff and absence of public access on these sites offers the City and the Broadway operators an advantage in controlling the local impacts that have earned the Council’s attention. There are many available mitigations that would not be possible on public sites with a different operating model and economic use case.

E. Policy Alignment
Santa Monica Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE)
Although electric vehicles are encouraged in the
LUCE, they were not widely available at the time
the LUCE was developed. Charging operations
were in their infancy and vehicle adoption was
limited to private use, mostly in single family
homes. California policies to promote EVs date
back to 1991, however, and the LUCE was drafted
with full awareness and alignment with those
policies, which anticipated that most on-road
vehicles would be electrified by the present time.
“Encourage the use of alternative fuel
vehicles, including electric vehicles, by
providing infrastructure such as charging
stations in public and private parking
facilities.”
(Santa Monica LUCE, adopted July 6, 2010,
Policy: Sustainable Transportation)
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 11 The potential benefits and harms of autonomous vehicles, on the other hand, could not be fully considered in the LUCE, since at the time the technology existed only in the imaginations of engineers and a few of their laboratories. Nevertheless, the potential benefits of autonomous vehicles for the LUCE policy goals are staggering. For starters, autonomous vehicles are massively safer than human-driven vehicles. As articulated by Mark R. Rosekind, Ph.D., former NHTSA Administrator; former NTSB Member, “We have also recently determined through our research that in 94 percent of cases, the critical element in the chain of events before a crash is the human driver. Technology offers a huge potential in mitigating this statistic.”3 Secondly, commercial autonomous vehicle fleets have the potential to reduce overall land consumption from vehicles, ceding land back to human uses. This occurs because vehicles utilize less road space through efficient road behavior, and the potential reduction in personal vehicle ownership reduces the demand for parking. This produces enormous dividends in the long run as it frees up land for human uses. In the LUCE itself, one finds many references to carsharing, which is most nearly analogous to the modern shared mobility services exhibited by Waymo, but combined with the benefits of electrification.

None of these benefits, however, undermine the very real, localized impacts of a commercial fleet operation located next to residential properties. Many Santa Monica residences are adjacent to commercial body shops, parking lots for school buses or trucks, and other similar uses. Those impacts must be properly mitigated and considered. Noise, lights, ingress/egress, safe passage, odors, and more are common impacts of commercial vehicle operations.

Both lots are in the MUBL (Mixed-Use Boulevard - Low) zone, which seeks to transform autooriented corridors into highly walkable, mixed-use areas and establishes buffers and transition standards to protect adjacent neighborhoods. In the MUBL, the City has clearly identified conflicts in residential and commercial adjacency and sought to contain and mitigate those conflicts. In the Broadway lots, this would include appropriate noise/light screening and minimized vehicle-pedestrian conflicts via adequate street access. The MUBL exists explicitly in recognition of the conflict between commercial and residential uses and applies strategies to reduce the conflicts over time with zoning, site, and infrastructure improvements.

FINDING: The stations’ use is consistent with LUCE's integrated land use and transportation strategy to reduce congestion and emissions and promote sustainable mobility. The LUCE and MUBL were explicitly developed to protect neighborhoods and promote successful transitions from commercial to residential uses.

EV Action Plan
The EV Action Plan (EVAP) was adopted by the City Council November 14, 2017 after a full year of community meetings and outreach including deliberation by at least three formal bodies – the Task Force on the Environment, Planning Commission, City Council – and a public comment 3 Keynote remarks covered by Fleet Management Weekly,
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2018/05/predictions-for-self-driving-cars-in-harvard-discussion/ See also New York Times Opinion piece dated December 2, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/02/opinion/self-driving-cars.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 12 period. It calls for modernizing/expanding EV infrastructure, adding smart charging, managing turnover, and leveraging fees and incentives like the Low Carbon Fuel Standard to sustain operations. It targets ~300 smart chargers by 2020 and ~1,000 by 2025.

FINDING: EV charging at Broadway contributes to EVAP goals and the City’s GHG-reduction goals.

Legal Framework (Permitting & Streamlining)
California's EV charging streamlining laws (Gov.

Code§ 65850.7) require administrative approval and
limit local authority to health and safety review,
taking away concerns over aesthetics, design,
neighborhood fit, or other considerations typically
within the City’s authority. They articulate a
statewide policy to promote and encourage EV
charging stations while limiting obstacles to their
installation. Denial or conditioning only can occur for health/safety reasons and requires written findings
supported by substantial evidence of a specific,
adverse health or safety impact that cannot be
feasibly mitigated. AB 970 (2021) adds binding
timelines (5-10 business days for application
completeness; 20-40 business days for approval)
with deemed approvals if no action is taken, which
is -applicable to charter cities like the City.

I contributed as an expert to the Legislature during the deliberations on these bills, as they were adopted, and as the agencies communicated and implemented them. At that time, charging infrastructure had fallen far behind vehicle adoption and was the primary limiting factor in broader adoption and achievement of California’s goals. For context, California has strict and high-profile regulations on the auto industry requiring EV sales. Automakers were challenging those regulations by pointing to the lack of progress installing charging infrastructure as both out of their hands and more in the direct control of the State. The legislature acted decisively to address this gap and quell the challenge to its authority. The permit streamlining laws are designed to prevent local governments from slowing down or blocking EV infrastructure, supporting California’s climate and transportation goals.

Imposing conditions beyond targeted health and safety requirements (after written findings supported by substantial evidence) is not allowed under state law. A sweeping prohibition of operations like the nighttime closure certainly would not appear to be a targeted health and safety condition in my opinion, particularly since it renders a station nonviable. Given that the City already provided the operators a 24/7 permit and is now attempting to impose such sweeping conditions is truly a mountain further to climb. “It is the intent of the Legislature to
achieve the timely and cost-effective
installation of electric vehicle charging
stations by removing obstacles to their
installation and use.”
“Streamlining local permitting and
inspection processes for electric vehicle
charging stations will facilitate the
deployment of this critical infrastructure
and support California’s goals for
greenhouse gas reduction and zeroemission vehicle adoption.” (California Assembly Bill 1236, Section 1)
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 13 FINDING: The City has very limited authority to impose conditions, hold hearings or otherwise impede development or operation of the subject stations. Doing so can expose the City to costly litigation and risk further restrictions in authority.

F. Documented Concerns of Neighbors
Complaints
I reviewed the correspondence provided to City officials from neighbors, which were obtained via a California Public Records Act request to ensure a comprehensive consideration of all viewpoints. The correspondence spans at least 7–8 months, with some references to issues beginning in January 2025.

I have summarized the concerns represented in the correspondence without rendering any opinions, attempting to validate whether the complaints are supported by facts to avoid misrepresenting residents’ actual statements. They are listed in order of frequency (i.e., the most frequent complaint is listed first, etc.).

1. Noise Pollution
• Reverse beeping from vehicles, especially at night (midnight–4am). • Continuous engine sounds from dozens of parked, running electric cars (unlike typical EV charging lots where cars are off).
• Cleaning/maintenance noise (including self-cleaning “tsk-tsk” and “whoosh” sounds, and vacuuming).
• Loud conversations, yelling, music from lot attendants and security, especially overnight.
• Noise complaints are ongoing; residents dispute City’s claim that complaints have subsided.

2. Light Pollution
• Headlights and hazard lights left on for parked/charging vehicles (“worse than the Vegas Strip”).
• Bright lights shining into homes, requiring blackout boards in windows. • No effective mitigation despite repeated requests.

3. Traffic, Circulation, and Alley Blockage
• Gridlock in the alley: Waymo vehicles queuing, beeping, and unable to navigate, causing congestion and frustration.
• Increased traffic volume: Vehicles now drive the entire block, enter from Colorado, and create “waves” of cars every 15 seconds.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 14 • Unsafe driving: Vehicles drive close to pedestrians and dogs at uncomfortable speeds.
• Airport runway-like behavior: Vehicles loop around the block, leave and return, increasing synthetic traffic.
• Parking on neighboring streets: Waymo vehicles idle for 20+ minutes waiting for rides, displacing resident parking.

4. Zoning and Land Use Violations
• Alleged illegal operation: Neighbors argue the lots are being used as a “Light Fleet taxicab depot,” not just for EV charging, which is not permitted in the MUBL zone. • Misrepresentation on permits: Applications described as “private fleet charging” but used for dispatch and storage.
• No active business licenses: Residents claim Waymo/Voltera lack proper permits for current operations.

5. Lack of Effective Enforcement
• Unclear or delayed enforcement: Residents express frustration with the City’s lack of clear, timely action.
• Burden on residents: Neighbors feel they are being drafted to monitor and report violations, with little follow-up from City agencies.
• Disengaged officers: Reports of officers refusing to cite violations, citing lack of interest or not wanting to spend time in depositions.

6. Quality of Life Impacts
• Sleep disruption: Noise and light prevent residents from sleeping. • Loss of enjoyment of homes and neighborhood: Residents feel they can’t enjoy their block, homes, or safety.
• Escalating tension: Neighbors are coming out to yell at cars and lot workers; frustration is high.

7. Privacy Concerns
• Waymo cameras: Residents report that vehicle cameras are left on, recording through windows and into homes 24/7.
• Requests for camera shielding have not been addressed.

8. City Process and Communication
• Lack of transparency: Residents feel the City has not been clear about the approval process or enforcement steps.
• Perceived favoritism: Some believe the City is prioritizing its relationship with Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 15 Waymo over resident concerns.
• Desire for engagement: Residents want to be included in drafting letters and compliance requests.

According to the City Attorney in their November 19 letter, “Since the beginning of this year, the City has received over 40 complaints about the Broadway Lots just to the 3-1-1 system, from at least 15 separate individuals, with more than half received since August 2025.” Some number of these complaints do not address operations at Broadway, rather they refer to Waymo operation in other parts of the city or unrelated to the charging activities at Broadway, leaving a few dozen that are specific to the Broadway lots from a handful of individuals with direct impacts that they have enumerated in detail.

The tone of these neighbor communications has
escalated from urgent to an emotionally heightened
state that reflects months of accumulated frustration
of the parties—neighbors, the City and Waymo—in
reaching a workable resolution. Residents describe the
situation in existential terms as “ruining lives” and
“destroying our community,” with their emails
evolving from detailed, organized correspondence
with itemized lists, timelines, and purported legal
citations into increasingly emotional demands that
reflect unrealistic expectations about reversing the
permitted development or halting all operations.

The activated neighbors’ sentiments are
understandable and valid. Unfortunately, the
responses have become divorced from what is legally
or practically achievable, with residents expressing
deep distrust and skepticism about the City’s willingness or ability to enforce regulations and rejecting partial fixes as insufficient. The correspondence is at times openly angry or sarcastic, with pointed remarks directed at both Waymo and the City, such as “All the best to everyone except for Waymo,” revealing a belief that the charging facilities can somehow be eliminated or fundamentally altered. Though some residents occasionally express a collaborative spirit and willingness to work with City officials, this is heavily tempered by clear exasperation at what they perceive as lack of meaningful progress, creating a situation where emotions are overriding the potential for practical resolution.

The situation has reached a critical inflection point, evidenced by neighbors moving beyond traditional advocacy to confrontational tactics that demonstrate the escalating nature of the dispute. In addition to direct correspondence with the City, neighbors have taken to news and social media and engaged in misconduct by physically blocking vehicles from entering the lots— actions that represent a fundamental breakdown in the dispute resolution process. I personally observed residents blocking Waymo vehicles on November 26th after 11pm. A widely circulated video of a separate incident captures a line of Waymo vehicles stuck in the alley due to residents “I would say that we need to
emphasize, at some point, that the
lights are a continual adverse effect on
us and that the noise continues. ... We
thought that ‘immediately’ meant that
if they did not comply with the
‘requests’ after receipt of the letter,
that the city would step in, but that
hasn’t happened nor have they
changed any of their behaviors in the
lot that I have observed.”
(Neighbor feedback, 9/12/25)
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 16 blocking access to the lot. These confrontational tactics, while reflecting the depth of neighbor frustration, also demonstrate how the prolonged period of inaction and unsuccessful resolution attempts by the parties has created an unsustainable crisis where neighbor expectations have become disconnected from the legal and operational realities.

FINDING: Neighbors organized and communicated a consistent list of disruptions to the City.

They are frustrated that they do not have more authority or input in the permitting and approval process and lack an understanding of how the state law modified what they see as the “normal” or “ordinary” process of city planning approvals.

G. Operational Responses to Date
Waymo and Voltera have already taken action to implement operational changes to respond to neighbor concerns. Waymo’s recent correspondence documents the steps already taken to address many impacts, including:
• Sound/Light measures: growing vegetation (incl. bamboo) as sound/light filters; turning off unnecessary lights when parked; situating cars away from Broadway pending vehicle feature updates; and willingness to install more substantial, tall and dense landscaping, awnings, and fencing/masonry.
• Quiet-hours: ceased vacuuming 9 pm–7 am since March 2025; daytime low-decibel vacuums; defer maintenance at night where practicable.
• Vehicle tones: in coordination with NHTSA, reverse-alert frequency reduced by >90%. • Circulation: one-way alley flow with >90% of vehicles spending <30 seconds; queue limits; non-intersecting gate paths; defleeting (5+ vehicles/hour) during congested periods; increased staff presence; ingresses <30s up from 87% to 94%, >60s down by 4%. • No storage/disptach: no long-term parking, servicing, or dispatch on site; vehicles arrive to charge and depart when complete; logs available on request.

These measures appear effective. Per the September 9 letter from City Planning Department (Jing Yao), “The City has received noise complaints in the past and we appreciate the cooperation we received from Waymo in addressing those complaints. In the last few weeks, it appears that complaints from residents regarding noise have subsided.” FINDING: The adjustments by the operators resolved the most serious concerns levied by the residents related to noise, and reduced the issues related to circulation and light.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 17 Communication and Perception
Unfortunately, not much can be done to address past communication failures. Trust has been eroded and can only be rebuilt with time and determination. As indicated below, to the best of its ability, the City followed state law and interpreted the law to mean that there would be no public hearing in advance of permitting.

Neighbors, having felt unheard, increased their volume. In a video shot in early November and widely distributed, a long line of more than ten Waymo vehicles idle in the alley awaiting entry to the western lot. In my site visits, I observed Waymo vehicle in the alley, street, intersections and around the block. I never directly observed anything like what occurred on this video. I did, however, observe activist residents blocking access for vehicles to the western lot. This produces a back-up of vehicles in the alley, and I believe that is how the video was created. It has been very effective in attracting attention to the cause, but like the summer video of a Waymo vehicle on the Penmar golf course in Venice,
4 the video is misleading. One cannot rely on the video for policymaking as it does not depict a daily or even regular happening and likely is a staged promotional event by the residents.

FINDING: Poor communications have eroded trust among the neighbors, operators and City officials and led to extreme actions and threats. Continuing dialogue and adding visible improvements will be needed to repair trust.

H. Traffic & Circulation (Euclid Ingress/Egress)
Reliance on alley access alone, while consistent with City policy, intensifies congestion at sensitive hours. It forces traffic (and its noise and lights) directly against the adjacent multifamily residences, and moreover, it exposes dozens of additional residences along the length of the block.

FINDING: Reliance on alley access alone for these sites is a significant flaw.
4 The Waymo vehicle crossing the fairway at Penmar Golf Course in summer 2025 was captioned with “Waymo goes wild,” and similar concepts. The truth, however, was that Waymo held a private event at Penmar and legally and intentionally drove a vehicle across the course as part of the event’s planned festivities.

Encoding only alley-access into
the design of the Broadway lots
is the original sin from which all
other perceived impacts flow.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 18 VI. Independent Assessment and Opinion
The City’s proposed response to neighbor concerns is to demand cessation of operations between 11 pm and 6 am. This approach will not be successful in achieving the goals of the City, the State, or the neighbors for various reasons.
o It does not conform with state law or longstanding City policy. o It does not address light impacts and only partially addresses noise impacts. o It does not address daytime circulation.
o It causes the charging stations to be economically unviable. o It will be immediately challenged by the operators, delaying any resolution for years. o It is likely to be overturned by a court of law.
o It does not restore trust among the parties.

The City, however, with the operators and neighbors now have a moment and space for a durable compromise. Solving this conflict is a learning opportunity for the City and the emerging autonomous vehicle industry for how to operate effectively in an established community and increase well-being, which is each party’s stated objective. Here is how it can be achieved… Recommendation to City Council
Direct City staff to negotiate and enter into durable agreements with the operators that recognize the operators’ legal rights to operate on a 24/7 basis, but mandates implementation of the operational changes and completion of the physical improvements offered in the November 26, 2025 letter from the operators with the modifications recommended herein. • Continue in-place operational quiet-hours controls
o Ensure no vacuuming or use of power tools 11 pm–6 am; o Maintain reduced reverse-alert tones now provided voluntarily by Waymo; • Implement additional operational quiet-hours controls o Minimize parked-vehicle light cycling of headlights and blinking hazard lights; o Remove or disable lighting effects from charging stations that are not operationally required
• Implement additional physical screening and light control o Install opaque fencing wraps on the property borders at the southern property borders, and if insufficient,
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 19 o Install mature, dense and tall vegetation at the southern property borders and alleys, and if insufficient,
o Dim or shield ambient lighting spillover onto adjacent lots, and if insufficient, o Install additional awnings/canopies and/or masonry walls with absorptive liners at residential interfaces of sufficient height to screen the immediately adjacent multifamily housing across the alleys (subject to utility easements and other legal restrictions).
• Implement circulation changes
o Remove the one-way orientation of 12th Court during nighttime hours to allow vehicles to enter the lot from Boadway and avoid driving the length of 12th Court at night.
o Investigate and if feasible establish a Euclid Street ingress/egress for the western lot, which is authorized under SMMC § 9.28.120(B)(3)(c). ▪ Note: this will take time to implement; Council should direct staff to swiftly complete the steps (design review, permits, and Public Works coordination) necessary to expedite this improvement.
o Euclid Street ingress/egress may help the eastern lot also, but is a lower priority than the western lot due to the immediate impacts to the west. • Facilitate communication
o Adopt a procedure such that if a specific, adverse impact is identified in the future, how the parties will work together to address it
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 20 VII.Conclusion
Neighbors who are both residential and commercial deserve peaceful enjoyment of their homes and offices and a neighborhood free from avoidable disruption; operators deserve lawful use of permitted facilities consistent with City permitting and State law. Purpose-built mitigationsrather than categorical shutdowns-best achieve this balance and align with LUCE/MUBL and EVAP policies to protect neighborhoods while supporting sustainable mobility.

It is my professional judgment that continuing 24/7 operations at 1222 and 1310 Broadway is consistent with City policy (LUCE), zoning (MUBL), goals (EVAP), State permit streamlining laws, and permits already issued by the City. To address neighbor concerns, the physical and operational mitigations described herein should be implemented and maintained as soon as feasible. These conditions buffer neighboring residences, reorient site lighting, reduce vehiclegenerated noise, and shift circulation from the alleys to primary streets in nighttime, when congestion on the roads is lower – achieving a workable balance between neighborhood quality of life and the lawful use of these properties for modern EV charging.

Further, it is my professional judgment that closing these sites from 11:00 pm to 6:00 am would have significant adverse economic effects on the operators, likely rendering Waymo’s use economically infeasible, while not mitigating the credible neighbor concerns about circulation, noise and lighting.

Despite the City having limited options due to state law, gains have already been made in reducing noise and light and improving circulation. Those gains along with the proposed additional mitigations offered by the operators and recommended in this report will provide the necessary improvements for a long and healthy operation of these facilities consistent with the prevailing uses in the neighborhood.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 1 David Yakobson
From: Council Mailbox
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 9:14 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce's Letter for Proposed EIZO for AV/EV Fleet Charging
Attachments: EIZO City Council Meeting LOO.pdf
From: Alex Brown <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 8:44 AM
To: Caroline Torosis <[email protected]>; Jesse Zwick <[email protected]>; Dan Hall <[email protected]>; Lana Negrete <[email protected]>; Ellis Raskin <[email protected]>; Barry Snell <[email protected]>; Natalya Zernitskaya <[email protected]>; Council Mailbox <[email protected]> Cc: Clerk Mailbox <[email protected]>; Oliver Chi <[email protected]>; Genevieve Morrill <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce's Letter for Proposed EIZO for AV/EV Fleet Charging

EXTERNAL
Dear City Councilmembers,
Please see attached for the Chamber of Commerce's letter of opposition regarding item 12.C on July 14th City Council Agenda.

Alex Brown
Director of Government Affairs & Director of Rebuild
Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce
(c): 510-402-9767
From: Alex Brown
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2026 11:59 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Genevieve Morrill <[email protected]>
Subject: Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce's Letter for Proposed EIZO for AV/EV Fleet Charging

Dear City Councilmembers,
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 2 Please see attached for the Chamber of Commerce's letter regarding the proposed EIZO for AV and EV fleet charging.

Respectfully,
Alex Brown
Director of Government Affairs & Director of Rebuild
Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce
(c): 510-402-9767
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities)

July 13, 2026
Mayor Caroline Torosis and Members of the Santa Monica City Council City of Santa Monica
1685 Main St. Room 250
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Re: Strong Opposition to Item 12.C — Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance Establishing Standards and Procedures for Light FleetBased Service for Autonomous Vehicles (Council Meeting of July 14, 2026)
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers:

On behalf of the Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce and its members, we write in strong opposition to Item 12.C on Tuesday's agenda and ask the Council to shelve it rather than adopt it. We are requesting a genuine conversation with the City, the Chamber, and the businesses this ordinance will directly affect before a decision is made regarding any ordinances or rezoning.

First, this EIZO is bad for business.

The EIZO was drafted with no advance stakeholder process and no consultation with the businesses it will directly affect. This ordinance risks deterring exactly the kind of new mobility investment and technology jobs Santa Monica says it wants to attract, in a city that positions itself as pro-business.

With the amount of investment already put into these expensive, technologically advanced charging stations this type of abrupt shift in regulation will scare future investors and entrepreneurs into thinking Santa Monica’s regulatory environment is unpredictable.

Second, this ordinance works against the environmentally conscious reputation the City of Santa Monica has built.

The EIZO’s overnight noise, lighting, and staffing restrictions effectively, and presumably purposefully, push AV fleet charging out of the overnight hours and into the day.

Overnight is when grid demand is lowest, renewable and off-peak power is most available, and charging is cheapest and cleanest. Forcing that load into daytime peak hours increases strain on the grid, raises the carbon intensity of the electricity used, and works directly against the City's own climate goals. An ordinance that makes clean-vehicle charging harder to do at the best possible time is not an environmental win, whatever its stated intent.

The Council should ask, before voting, whether this decision and outcome are consistent with Santa Monica’s climate action commitments.

Finally, we also do not accept, and do not believe the Council should concede, that this EIZO complies with State law. This may leave the City open to litigation.

As one attorney advising affected businesses noted after this week's Government Affairs Committee discussion, renaming the target from Board Executives
Chair
Paula Larmore
Harding, Larmore,
Kutcher & Kozal LLP
Past Chair
Charlie LopezQuintana
ETC Hotels
Incoming Chair
Addie VanGessel
Tavern on Main
Vice-Chair
Dustin Peterson
Fairmont Miramar
Hotel & Bungalows
Vice-Chair
Jeremy Rawitch
RAND
Vice-Chair
Vee Gomez
Beach Yoga SoCal
Vice-Chair
Melissa Cohen
Boston Properties
Vice-Chair
Elias Garcia
Kaiser Permanente
Directors
Eddie Guerboian
Jeweler
Neil Carrey Attorney
Directors
Elnie Vannatim
Cedars Sinai
Gina Gribow
EKA Public Affairs
Lilit Avagyan
US Bank
Ben Marcus
UP Partners
Michael Altchule
UCLA Health
Shari Davis
Santa Monica
College
Wesly Hernandez
SNAP Inc.

Berta Negari
XYZ Rent
Garrett Childers
SM Fire 1109
Doreen Lahav
Prism Places
Kara Block
DHF Architects
Carlos Madrid

SMPD POA
Jared Amerson
Providence Saint
John’s
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) “EV” to “AV” fleet operations does not change the fact that these are electric vehicle charging operations protected from local micromanagement under Government Code sections 65850.7 and 65850.71. There is no indication the revised EIZO is legally compliant.

We recognize the City has legitimate concerns about queuing and emergency access, but an emergency ordinance adopted overnight is the wrong tool. We respectfully urge the Council to:

1. Table Item 12.C rather than adopt it as an emergency ordinance;

2. Direct staff to convene a working session with the Chamber and affected businesses before any ordinance is redrafted.

Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to being part of the conversation.

Respectfully,
Genevieve Morrill
Interim CEO
Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 1 David Yakobson
From: Mary Ann Vorasky <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 2:46 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Fw: Support for proposed ordinance concerning Waymo operations

EXTERNAL
Please include the message below as written public comment for City Council Agenda Item 12.C. I originally submitted it to Santa Monica 311 at 10:09 a.m. today. Thank you.~Mary Ann Vorasky "That childlike innocence within you is God." - Amma
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Mary Ann Vorasky <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 at 10:09:46 AM PDT
Subject: Support for proposed ordinance concerning Waymo operations Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I live in Santa Monica near 11th Street, between Olympic Boulevard and Pico Boulevard, and I am writing in support of the proposed ordinance concerning Waymo’s operations.

I have become increasingly concerned by the number of Waymo vehicles circulating through my neighborhood while I am walking. Although I do not live close enough to hear the charging-lot noise, I understand why nearby residents feel overwhelmed. Even several blocks away, the steady stream of Waymo vehicles has made my neighborhood feel overrun by an ever-circling fleet.

I also personally witnessed a Waymo vehicle run a red light at Pico Boulevard and 14th Street.

Because of the way 14th Street jogs over across Pico, the intersection is unusually long. I recognize that one incident does not by itself establish a broader pattern, but it contributed to my concerns about safety and accountability.

I support the city’s efforts to establish clearer local rules and oversight. Waymo appears to have established and expanded these operations without sufficient transparency, community consultation, or regard for the cumulative effects on nearby residents.

I would also encourage the city to study whether a publicly operated fleet of small electric vehicles could complement Big Blue Bus. Waymo reports providing hundreds of thousands of rides per week across all of its service areas, although it does not disclose Santa Monica-specific ridership or revenue. The scale of those operations raises a worthwhile question: could Santa Monica offer a smaller, publicly accountable service whose fares and benefits support local transportation rather than a private corporation?
Thank you for considering the perspective of a concerned resident. I hope the council will adopt meaningful safeguards that prioritize neighborhood quality of life, public safety, transparency, and local accountability.

Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 2 Sincerely,
Mary Ann Vorasky
Santa Monica Resident
"That childlike innocence within you is God." - Amma
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 3 David Yakobson
From: Hannah Goldsmith <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 12:45 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Jing Yeo; Heidi von Tongeln
Cc: Gia Vacin; Heather Hickerson; Jessie Denver; Elsa Alves; Van Nguyen; Michelle M.

Hugard
Subject: GO-Biz Feedback on Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance - City Council Meeting Item

12.C.

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council, Director Yeo, and City Attorney von Tongeln, The Governor’s OƯice of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) has reviewed the revised Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance Establishing Standards and Procedures for Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles (EIZO) (Agenda Item 12.C.) following its public release and appreciates the opportunity to provide additional feedback. Several elements in the updated draft reflect recommendations discussed during our June 4, 2026 meeting and included in our follow-up email on June 6. Primarily, GO-Biz suggested regulating the intended use separately from the electric vehicle charging station permit, among other feedback, as referenced in the City Council Report for the EIZO.

After reviewing the revised EIZO, we would like to provide additional high-level feedback to help ensure continued alignment with California’s electric vehicle (EV) charging station streamlining laws, Government Code sections 65850.7 and 65850.71, while supporting the City’s objectives regarding regulation of autonomous vehicle (AV) fleet operations.

As highlighted previously, EV charging station applications must be processed and approved ministerially, with review limited to objective public health and safety standards, and conditions limited to those that mitigate specific public health or safety impacts at the lowest cost. (Gov. Code, § 65850.7, subds. (b), (c), (e), (i)(5).) Government Code section 65850.71 reinforces this framework by establishing required review and approval timelines. Any conditions tied to an EV charging station permit must be directly related to a specific, adverse impact “based on objective, identified, and written public health or safety standards.” (Gov. Code, § 65850.7, subd. (i)(5).)
In this context, if the City of Santa Monica intends to tie the EIZO’s conditions to a charging station permit for a site serving an AV fleet, the City must ensure the EIZO conditions are objective health and safety standards intended to mitigate specific public health or safety impacts of that particular charging station. In other words, when the permit being sought is for charging infrastructure, but the charging infrastructure is intended to support AV fleet operation, the EIZO may be viewed as the source of objective, health and safety conditions permissible under Government Code section 65850.7 review, provided those conditions are objective and tied to specific, adverse public health or safety impact of the particular project. If the City intends to require a wholly separate permit for AV fleet operations and provide the charging station permit independently of that process (as GO-Biz previously suggested), then the charging station application must be reviewed and permit provided consistent with Government Code section 65850.7. If charging station permits are currently being held, then that would appear to mean that the City is not reviewing such permits in compliance with the requirements of Government Code sections 65850.7 and 65850.71.

With this in mind, particularly if the City intends to tie the EIZO to charging station permit applications, we note that some provisions of the revised EIZO may not meet the objective standard required Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 4 by Government Code section 65850.7 subdivision (i)(5) or be considered appropriate for every project that falls under the EIZO. For example, the overnight noise restriction includes a subjective standard. (See definition of “plainly audible” in subdivision (D)(10)(a)(iv)(B).) Additionally, the full prohibition of overnight services is likely not a condition that meets the standard of being “designed to mitigate the specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety at the lowest cost possible.” (Gov. Code, § 65850.7, subd. (e).) Finally, we recommend removing “fueling” from the definition of “Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles.” As related to charging station applications, fueling—or charging—by itself, cannot be the trigger for regulation like this, since such regulation of charging is preempted by Government Code section 65850.7. (See also, the Attorney General’s Legal Alert, OAG 2025-01.) Thank you for the opportunity to provide this feedback and we welcome any opportunities for further engagement.

Sincerely,
Hannah
Hannah Goldsmith (she/her)
Assistant Deputy Director, Legal Affairs
office: (916) 447-7942
1325 J Street, Suite 1800 | Sacramento, CA 95814
Follow: LinkedIn | YouTube
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.d
Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV charging facilities) 1 City Council Meeting: July 14, 2026 Santa Monica, California ORDINANCE NUMBER _____ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

AN EMERGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MONICA TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES OF

APPROVAL FOR LIGHT FLEET-BASED SERVICE FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES

AND CREATE A USE CLASSIFICATION FOR LIGHT FLEET-BASED SERVICE FOR

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES
WHEREAS, recent development proposals have introduced high volume fleet maintenance operations for autonomous vehicles; and
WHEREAS, these uses introduce land use impacts not fully addressed by existing regulations; and
WHEREAS, documented key concerns include, but are not limited to: (1) Queuing and staging in the public right-of-way; (2) Obstruction of emergency access routes; (3) Noise and lighting impacts on nearby residential areas; and (4) Lack of operational accountability for fleet dispatch systems; and
WHEREAS, based on prior documented occurrences, additional impacts may arise due to concentrated arrival surges, limited driveway capacity, and the duration autonomous vehicles remain on-site; and
WHEREAS, continuous 24-hour operations further exacerbate these concerns by introducing nighttime queuing, noise, and light intrusion during sensitive hours, as evidenced by over 140 complaints associated with certain existing facilities used for fleet management; and
WHEREAS, this emergency ordinance provides a framework that introduces a new use classification for fleet-based services for autonomous vehicles, and objective

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
2 operational standards to mitigate impacts from this emerging land use, and a process for review and approval of such uses; and
WHEREAS, the emergency ordinance provides a limited discretionary review process for projects that cannot comply with the enumerated operational standards; and WHEREAS, this emergency ordinance is consistent with the City’s local authority to address land use and public safety impacts involving autonomous vehicle fleet operations; and
WHEREAS, several applications for high-intensity fleet maintenance operations for autonomous vehicles have necessitated the immediate need for the City to address these land use impacts; and
WHEREAS, adoption of this Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance is necessary to preserve public peace, health, safety and welfare as it will allow the City to address land use impacts and public safety associated with fleet maintenance operations for autonomous vehicles.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.31.165, Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles, is hereby added and shall read as follows:

9.31.165 Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles A. Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this Section is to set forth specific standards for Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles, as defined by Section

9.51.020(D)(6.5), in order to mitigate impacts to public right-of-way, impacts on adjacent

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
3 residentially zoned property, and documented adverse impacts upon public health or safety.

B. Location. Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles shall be permitted in the General Commercial (GC), Industrial Conservation (IC), and Transit Adjacent (TA) Zoning Districts, subject to ministerial approval or a Minor Use Permit as set forth in subsection (C), below.

C. Procedure.

1. Minor Use Permit Required. A Minor Use Permit shall be required in accordance with Chapter 9.41, unless the proposed use has received a Light-Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles Zoning Conformance Permit and complies with the operational conditions set forth in Section D. A Minor Use Permit application shall be submitted to the City in compliance with Chapter 9.41, except that the Minor Use Permit shall be reviewed based only on the following findings:
a. The proposed use is conditionally allowed within the applicable Zoning District.
b. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
c. The proposed use will not detrimentally affect nearby neighborhoods, considering the distance of the proposed use to residentially-zoned parcels and other existing light fleet-based services for autonomous vehicles.

2. Ministerial Approval. Applications for Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles Zoning Conformance Permits meeting the requirements of Section D shall be reviewed and approved administratively in accordance with Section 9.37.160.

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
4 D. Light Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles Zoning Conformance Permit. Applicants for Light Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles shall be eligible for a Light Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicle Zoning Conformance Permit if such permit is approved in writing by the Director and the applicant agrees in writing to comply with all of the following criteria and operational conditions:

1. Dispatch Coordination Plan
a. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a Parking and Loading Operations Plan with a fleet dispatch coordination component that indicates when dispatching and vehicle arrivals will be slowed, held, or suspended for review and approval by the Mobility Division. The plan shall demonstrate how vehicle arrivals will be managed to prevent queuing in the public right-of-way. b. The plan shall coordinate dispatch timing with internal site circulation and shall include, at a minimum, procedures for managing arrival rates, monitoring site occupancy in real time, and preventing vehicle staging when the facility is at capacity.
c. Operation of the facility shall be conducted in accordance with the approved plan.

2. Prohibition on Off-site Queuing and Emergency Vehicle Access Clearance a. Queuing.
i. Fleet vehicles shall not queue, stage, or idle in the public rightof-way, including adjacent alleys, or nearby residential streets. ii. All queuing must be accommodated within the site. Vehicles shall circulate off-site if the facility is at capacity.

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
5 iii. If vehicles already en route to the site must delay or circulate in order to comply with the approved arrival-rate and occupancy management strategy, such circulation shall not occur within a half mile of the site.
b. Adjacent alleys.
i. Adjacent alleys shall not be used for routine vehicle staging or queuing and may only function as an emergency overflow relief (“safety valve”) to preserve required clearance and prevent obstruction of highervolume streets. ii. Any temporary use of the alley for this purpose shall maintain the required 11-foot clear path at all times and shall be actively managed by on-site personnel.

3. Minimum Clearance.
a. At all times, a minimum 11-foot clear width shall be maintained in all alleys and access ways consistent with all applicable provisions of the Santa Monica Municipal Code and fire access standards.
b. Vehicles shall not stage, queue, or idle in a manner that obstructs emergency vehicles or essential services on any adjacent public right-of-way.

4. Emergency Operations. Operations shall be conducted such that emergency access is continuously maintained without reliance on ad hoc vehicle repositioning or delayed manual intervention.

5. Limit to total vehicles served. The total number of vehicles on-site shall not exceed the number of available parking spaces on-site.

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
6 6. Minimum On-Site Staffing.
a. A minimum of two (2) trained on-site personnel shall be present during all hours of operation to actively manage vehicle circulation, coordinate fleet dispatch, prevent queuing in the public right-of-way, and ensure that required emergency access is maintained at all times. At least one staff member shall be assigned to monitor the site entrance and adjacent public right-of-way. b. On-site personnel shall be responsible for real-time coordination with the fleet operator or dispatch system to regulate vehicle arrivals so that vehicles are dispatched to the site only when sufficient on-site capacity is available.

Personnel shall monitor site occupancy, control arrival flow, direct vehicles to available spaces, and reposition vehicles as necessary to prevent obstruction of travel lanes, alleys, or emergency access routes.
c. Dispatching to the site shall be actively managed. It may be delayed, staggered, or suspended by the operator or on-site personnel as necessary to prevent queuing or circulation conflicts, or resolve queuing or circulation conflicts within five minutes.
d. At least one staff member shall be on-site during all hours of operation who is authorized and able to coordinate the removal, repositioning, remote movement, towing, or other clearance of any vehicle malfunction or other operational condition that blocks the public right-of-way or impedes on-site vehicle circulation. Site operations shall be actively monitored to identify such obstructions in real time, and clearance measures shall be initiated immediately and completed

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
7 as soon as practicable, and in no event later than five minutes after the obstruction occurs, without the need for City notification or a complaint.

7. Operational Monitoring and Reporting Requirements.
a. The operator shall cooperate with ongoing City monitoring of site operations.
b. If the City determines that operations are not in compliance with the standards in this ordinance, including but not limited to, queuing, right-of-way obstruction, emergency access interference, or other public health and safety impacts, the operator shall participate in coordination meetings with the City and upon request, submit updated operational plans to mitigate impacts. Such updated plans may include required modifications to operations, including adjustments to staffing, dispatch coordination, or circulation management. Operator shall promptly implement operational modifications to the satisfaction of the City.

8. Site Liaison Contact Required.
a. Applicant shall designate a neighborhood liaison who shall be the primary contact is responsible for addressing neighbor and transportation-related concerns and complaints.
b. If the operator receives any complaints about noise, light, glare, or traffic impacts, all reasonable efforts shall be taken to address and remediate the concerns in a timely manner.

9. Distance Requirement. No more than one Light Fleet-Based Services for Autonomous Vehicles use shall be permitted per block.

10. Special Standards for Sites within 100 feet of residentially zoned property.

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
8 a. Noise Control Measures. The following noise control measures shall apply to light-fleet based services as a land use when associated with autonomous vehicles and located within 100 feet of a residentially-zoned property at the time the application is determined to be complete.
i. Operations shall comply with all applicable City noise regulations, including SMMC Chapter 4.12 (Noise), and shall be conducted in a manner that minimizes noise impacts on surrounding properties. ii. Operators shall install a sound wall of at least 8 feet high on the perimeter property lines and in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.21.180.
iii. The circulation of the site shall be designed to reduce the need to backup vehicles.
iv. Overnight Noise Restrictions. Between the hours of 11 p.m. and 6 a.m.:
(A) On parcels located within 100 feet of a residentiallyzoned property at the time the application for the operation is determined complete, no light fleet-based service operations for autonomous vehicles, as defined in Section 9.51.030(D)(6.5), shall be conducted, except that autonomous vehicles shall be permitted to enter and exit for purposes of vehicle charging only. (B) Operations shall comply with all applicable City noise regulations, including SMMC Chapter 4.12 (Noise), and regulations for overnight business operations, and shall be conducted in a

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
9 manner that minimizes noise impacts on surrounding properties. No noise shall be generated that is plainly audible from an adjacent residential property line or from a distance of 100 feet from the source of the noise, whichever is closer. For purposes of this section, “plainly audible” shall mean the sound in question can be easily detected, without undue effort, by an enforcement officer of normal unaided hearing. Words, phrases, or specific noise signatures need not be discernible or identifiable. When music is involved, the detection of rhythmic bass tones shall be sufficient to be considered plainly audible sound. Plainly audible does not implicate issues of subjective "loudness" – the plainly audible standard simply determines whether any noise can be heard regardless of the perceived "loudness." Plainly audible observation alone is sufficient to support and prove a noise disturbance.
b. Lighting and Headlight Control
i. In accordance with Section 9.21.080, any on-site lighting shall be shielded in order to prevent light and glare impacts on nearby properties and uses.
ii. On-site lighting shall be oriented in a manner that faces away from all nearby residential uses.
iii. Between 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., site lighting shall not exceed the standards set forth in Section 9.21.080(F).

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
10 E. Enforcement. If it is determined that the Light Fleet-Based Vehicle Service for Autonomous Vehicles has violated the use standards in this section, or any MUP issued in accordance with this Section, the City may pursue all available remedies including, but not limited to, those under Section 9.48.

SECTION 2. Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.51.030(D)(6.5), Light FleetBased Service for Autonomous Vehicles, is hereby added and shall read as follows:

9.51.030(D)(6.5) Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles. Passenger transportation services, local delivery services, medical transport, and other businesses that rely on fleets of 3 or more autonomous vehicles, as defined by Vehicle Code Section 38750, with rated capacities less than 10,000 lbs. This classification includes the following activities for autonomous vehicles, including, but not limited to, parking, dispatching, storage, fueling, cleaning, software servicing, vehicle maintenance and servicing, and offices for taxicab and limousine operations, ambulance services, nonemergency medical transport, local messenger and document delivery services, home cleaning services, and similar businesses. This classification does not include towing operations (see Automobile/Vehicle Sales and Service, Towing and Impound), or taxi or delivery services with 2 or fewer fleet vehicles on site (see Business Services). This classification also does not include electric vehicle charging-only facilities. Facilities with electric vehicle charging are not exempt from this classification solely because electric vehicle charging occurs on site.

SECTION 3. Any provision of the Santa Monica Municipal Code or any appendix thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
11 inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. This Ordinance is declared to be an emergency measure necessary for preserving the public peace, health, safety or welfare, adopted pursuant to the provisions of Section 615 of the Santa Monica City Charter. As set forth in the findings above and in the July 14, 2026, staff report, this Ordinance is necessary for preserving the public peace, health, safety, and welfare. As an emergency measure, this Ordinance will be effective immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 6. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper within 15 days after its adoption. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be of no further force or effect as of September 12, 2026, unless it is otherwise extended pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.46.090(C).

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
12 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________

HEIDI VON TONGELN
City Attorney

12.C.e
Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: ADD TO: REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - REDLINE VERSION (7745 :
1 City Council Meeting: July 14, 2026 Santa Monica, California ORDINANCE NUMBER _____ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

AN EMERGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MONICA TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES OF

APPROVAL FOR LIGHT FLEET-BASED SERVICE FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES

AND CREATE A USE CLASSIFICATION FOR LIGHT FLEET-BASED SERVICE FOR

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES
WHEREAS, recent development proposals have introduced high volume fleet maintenance operations for autonomous vehicles; and
WHEREAS, these uses introduce land use impacts not fully addressed by existing regulations; and
WHEREAS, documented key concerns include, but are not limited to: (1) Queuing and staging in the public right-of-way; (2) Obstruction of emergency access routes; (3) Noise and lighting impacts on nearby residential areas; and (4) Lack of operational accountability for fleet dispatch systems; and
WHEREAS, based on prior documented occurrences, additional impacts may arise due to concentrated arrival surges, limited driveway capacity, and the duration autonomous vehicles remain on-site; and
WHEREAS, continuous 24-hour operations further exacerbate these concerns by introducing nighttime queuing, noise, and light intrusion during sensitive hours, as evidenced by over 140 complaints associated with certain existing facilities used for fleet management; and
WHEREAS, this emergency ordinance provides a framework that introduces a new use classification for fleet-based services for autonomous vehicles, and objective

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION 2 operational standards to mitigate impacts from this emerging land use, and a process for review and approval of such uses; and
WHEREAS, the emergency ordinance provides a limited discretionary review process for projects that cannot comply with the enumerated operational standards; and WHEREAS, this emergency ordinance is consistent with the City’s local authority to address land use and public safety impacts involving autonomous vehicle fleet operations; and
WHEREAS, several applications for high-intensity fleet maintenance operations for autonomous vehicles have necessitated the immediate need for the City to address these land use impacts; and
WHEREAS, adoption of this Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance is necessary to preserve public peace, health, safety and welfare as it will allow the City to address land use impacts and public safety associated with fleet maintenance operations for autonomous vehicles.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.31.165, Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles, is hereby added and shall read as follows:

9.31.165 Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles A. Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this Section is to set forth specific standards for Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles, as defined by Section

9.51.020(D)(6.5), in order to mitigate impacts to public right-of-way, impacts on adjacent

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION 3 residentially zoned property, and documented adverse impacts upon public health or safety.

B. Location. Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles shall be permitted in the General Commercial (GC), Industrial Conservation (IC), and Transit Adjacent (TA) Zoning Districts, subject to ministerial approval or a Minor Use Permit as set forth in subsection (C), below.

C. Procedure.

1. Minor Use Permit Required. A Minor Use Permit shall be required in accordance with Chapter 9.41, unless the proposed use has received a Light-Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles Zoning Conformance Permit and complies with the operational conditions set forth in Section D. A Minor Use Permit application shall be submitted to the City in compliance with Chapter 9.41, except that the Minor Use Permit shall be reviewed based only on the following findings:
a. The proposed use is conditionally allowed within the applicable Zoning District.
b. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
c. The proposed use will not detrimentally affect nearby neighborhoods, considering the distance of the proposed use to residentially-zoned parcels and other existing light fleet-based services for autonomous vehicles.

2. Ministerial Approval. Applications for Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles Zoning Conformance Permits meeting the requirements of Section D shall be reviewed and approved administratively in accordance with Section 9.37.160.

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION 4 D. Light Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles Zoning Conformance Permit. Applicants for Light Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles shall be eligible for a Light Fleet Based Service for Autonomous Vehicle Zoning Conformance Permit if such permit is approved in writing by the Director and the applicant agrees in writing to comply with all of the following criteria and operational conditions:

1. Dispatch Coordination Plan
a. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a Parking and Loading Operations Plan with a fleet dispatch coordination component that indicates when dispatching and vehicle arrivals will be slowed, held, or suspended for review and approval by the Mobility Division. The plan shall demonstrate how vehicle arrivals will be managed to prevent queuing in the public right-of-way. b. The plan shall coordinate dispatch timing with internal site circulation and shall include, at a minimum, procedures for managing arrival rates, monitoring site occupancy in real time, and preventing vehicle staging when the facility is at capacity.
c. Operation of the facility shall be conducted in accordance with the approved plan.

2. Prohibition on Off-site Queuing and Emergency Vehicle Access Clearance a. Queuing.
i. Fleet vehicles shall not queue, stage, or idle in the public rightof-way, including adjacent alleys, or nearby residential streets. ii. All queuing must be accommodated within the site. Vehicles shall circulate off-site if the facility is at capacity.

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION 5 iii. If vehicles already en route to the site must delay or circulate in order to comply with the approved arrival-rate and occupancy management strategy, such circulation shall not occur within a half mile of the site.
b. Adjacent alleys.
i. Adjacent alleys shall not be used for routine vehicle staging or queuing and may only function as an emergency overflow relief (“safety valve”) to preserve required clearance and prevent obstruction of highervolume streets. ii. Any temporary use of the alley for this purpose shall maintain the required 11-foot clear path at all times and shall be actively managed by on-site personnel.

3. Minimum Clearance.
a. At all times, a minimum 11-foot clear width shall be maintained in all alleys and access ways consistent with all applicable provisions of the Santa Monica Municipal Code and fire access standards.
b. Vehicles shall not stage, queue, or idle in a manner that obstructs emergency vehicles or essential services on any adjacent public right-of-way.

4. Emergency Operations. Operations shall be conducted such that emergency access is continuously maintained without reliance on ad hoc vehicle repositioning or delayed manual intervention.

5. Limit to total vehicles served. The total number of vehicles on-site shall not exceed the number of available parking spaces on-site.

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION 6 6. Minimum On-Site Staffing.
a. A minimum of two (2) trained on-site personnel shall be present during all hours of operation to actively manage vehicle circulation, coordinate fleet dispatch, prevent queuing in the public right-of-way, and ensure that required emergency access is maintained at all times. At least one staff member shall be assigned to monitor the site entrance and adjacent public right-of-way. b. On-site personnel shall be responsible for real-time coordination with the fleet operator or dispatch system to regulate vehicle arrivals so that vehicles are dispatched to the site only when sufficient on-site capacity is available.

Personnel shall monitor site occupancy, control arrival flow, direct vehicles to available spaces, and reposition vehicles as necessary to prevent obstruction of travel lanes, alleys, or emergency access routes.
c. Dispatching to the site shall be actively managed. It may be delayed, staggered, or suspended by the operator or on-site personnel as necessary to prevent queuing or circulation conflicts, or resolve queuing or circulation conflicts within five minutes.
d. At least one staff member shall be on-site during all hours of operation who is authorized and able to coordinate the removal, repositioning, remote movement, towing, or other clearance of any vehicle malfunction or other operational condition that blocks the public right-of-way or impedes on-site vehicle circulation. Site operations shall be actively monitored to identify such obstructions in real time, and clearance measures shall be initiated immediately and completed

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION 7 as soon as practicable, and in no event later than five minutes after the obstruction occurs, without the need for City notification or a complaint.

7. Operational Monitoring and Reporting Requirements.
a. The operator shall cooperate with ongoing City monitoring of site operations.
b. If the City determines that operations are not in compliance with the standards in this ordinance, including but not limited to, queuing, right-of-way obstruction, emergency access interference, or other public health and safety impacts, the operator shall participate in coordination meetings with the City and upon request, submit updated operational plans to mitigate impacts. Such updated plans may include required modifications to operations, including adjustments to staffing, dispatch coordination, or circulation management. Operator shall promptly implement operational modifications to the satisfaction of the City.

8. Site Liaison Contact Required.
a. Applicant shall designate a neighborhood liaison who shall be the primary contact for neighbor and transportation-related concerns and complaints. b. If the operator receives any complaints about noise, light, glare, or traffic impacts, all reasonable efforts shall be taken to address and remediate the concerns in a timely manner.

9. Distance Requirement. No more than one Light Fleet-Based Services for Autonomous Vehicles use shall be permitted per block.

10. Special Standards for Sites within 100 feet of residentially zoned property.

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION 8 a. Noise Control Measures. The following noise control measures shall apply to light-fleet based services as a land use when associated with autonomous vehicles and located within 100 feet of a residentially-zoned property at the time the application is determined to be complete.
i. Operations shall comply with all applicable City noise regulations, including SMMC Chapter 4.12 (Noise), and shall be conducted in a manner that minimizes noise impacts on surrounding properties. ii. Operators shall install a sound wall of at least 8 feet high on the perimeter property lines and in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.21.180.
iii. The circulation of the site shall be designed to reduce the need to backup vehicles.
iv. Overnight Noise Restrictions. Between the hours of 11 p.m. and 6 a.m.:
(A) On parcels located within 100 feet of a residentiallyzoned property at the time the application for the operation is determined complete, no light fleet-based service operations for autonomous vehicles, as defined in Section 9.51.030(D)(6.5), shall be conducted, except that autonomous vehicles shall be permitted to enter and exit for purposes of vehicle charging only. (B) Operations shall comply with all applicable City noise regulations, including SMMC Chapter 4.12 (Noise), and regulations

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION 9 for overnight business operations, and shall be conducted in a manner that minimizes noise impacts on surrounding properties. b. Lighting and Headlight Control
i. In accordance with Section 9.21.080, any on-site lighting shall be shielded in order to prevent light and glare impacts on nearby properties and uses.
ii. On-site lighting shall be oriented in a manner that faces away from all nearby residential uses.
iii. Between 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., site lighting shall not exceed the standards set forth in Section 9.21.080(F).

E. Enforcement. If it is determined that the Light Fleet-Based Vehicle Service for Autonomous Vehicles has violated the use standards in this section, or any MUP issued in accordance with this Section, the City may pursue all available remedies including, but not limited to, those under Section 9.48.

SECTION 2. Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.51.030(D)(6.5), Light FleetBased Service for Autonomous Vehicles, is hereby added and shall read as follows:

9.51.030(D)(6.5) Light Fleet-Based Service for Autonomous Vehicles. Passenger transportation services, local delivery services, medical transport, and other businesses that rely on fleets of 3 or more autonomous vehicles, as defined by Vehicle Code Section 38750, with rated capacities less than 10,000 lbs. This classification includes the following activities for autonomous vehicles, including, but not limited to, dispatching, storage, fueling, cleaning, software servicing, vehicle maintenance and servicing, and offices for taxicab and limousine operations, ambulance services, nonemergency medical transport,

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION 10 local messenger and document delivery services, home cleaning services, and similar businesses. This classification does not include towing operations (see Automobile/Vehicle Sales and Service, Towing and Impound), or taxi or delivery services with 2 or fewer fleet vehicles on site (see Business Services). This classification also does not include electric vehicle charging-only facilities. Facilities with electric vehicle charging are not exempt from this classification solely because electric vehicle charging occurs on site.

SECTION 3. Any provision of the Santa Monica Municipal Code or any appendix thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. This Ordinance is declared to be an emergency measure necessary for preserving the public peace, health, safety or welfare, adopted pursuant to the provisions of Section 615 of the Santa Monica City Charter. As set forth in the findings above and in the July 14, 2026, staff report, this Ordinance is necessary for preserving

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION 11 the public peace, health, safety, and welfare. As an emergency measure, this Ordinance will be effective immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 6. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper within 15 days after its adoption. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be of no further force or effect as of September 12, 2026, unless it is otherwise extended pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.46.090(C).

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________

HEIDI VON TONGELN
City Attorney

12.C.f
Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: ADD TO_REVISED CDD-ORD-Emergency IZO re Light Fleet-Based Service for AV_07.14.26_Updated - CLEAN COPY VERSION Emergency IZO – Fleet Operations
for Autonomous Vehicles
City Council
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.g
Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV Purpose
• Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance regulating fleet operations for autonomous vehicles
• Create new land use classification
• Standardized Operating Conditions with ministerial process • Public hearing only if standard conditions cannot be met • Augmented operating conditions for sites within 100 feet of residentially zoned property
• Establish enforceable standards balancing innovation, neighborhood protection, and public safety
• DOES NOT regulate electric vehicle charging
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.g
Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV Why Action Is Needed Now
• Autonomous fleet operations create impacts not addressed by current zoning
• Observed issues
• Public right-of-way queuing
• Potential for obstructing emergency access
• Noise/light impacts from maintenance activities near residential neighborhoods
• Pending applications create an immediate need for standards Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.g
Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV Proposed Regulatory Framework
• New use classification for Light Fleet-
Based Service for Autonomous
Vehicles
• Permitted in GC, IC, and TA districts subject to standard conditions • Santa Monica Boulevard “auto row” • Lincoln Boulevard south of I-10 • Olympic Boulevard • Downtown freeway-adjacent • Minor Use Permit required when objective standards cannot be met • Structured similar to Alcohol Exemption/Conditional Use Permit permitting process for alcohol sales
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.g
Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV Proposed Regulatory Framework
• Why are fleet operations for autonomous vehicles different? • Volume of vehicles & Coordinated dispatch with 24/7 operations • Results in concentrated impacts with unique ability to affect public rightof-way in ways that typical fleet operations do not • Maintenance operations that are more similar to industrial worksites • Regulates fleet operations activities that are not integral to EV charging:
• Maintenance
• Cleaning
• Vehicle servicing
• Regulates fleet operations to mitigate impacts to public right-of-way • Does not regulate EV-charging
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.g
Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV Standard Operational Conditions
Focus on mitigating potential impacts to public right-of-way • Dispatch coordination
• Required parking & loading operations plan
• No off-site queuing or staging
• Fleet limited to on-site parking capacity
• 11-foot emergency access maintained
• Minimum two trained staff on-site
• Ongoing monitoring and operator accountability including designating neighborhood liaison
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.g
Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV Standard Conditions for Residential Protections
Focused on mitigating light and noise impacts
• Applicability
• Fleet operations within 100 feet of residential zoning • Noise controls and overnight restrictions on fleet operations (11 PM–6 AM) • No maintenance, cleaning, servicing of vehicles during overnight hours • EV charging-only is allowed during overnight hours per State law • Required compliance with Noise Ordinance
• Shielded lighting and glare controls
• Sound walls/site design where appropriate
• Maximum one autonomous fleet operation per block
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.g
Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV Recommendation
• Adopt CEQA finding of no possibility of significant effect (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)) and §15308
• Introduce and adopt Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance (EIZO) to create a new land use classification and standards for autonomous light fleet-based services
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026
Item 12-C
July 14, 2026

12.C.g
Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (7745 : Emergency IZO for special standards for EV City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.A
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, Interim City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Appointments to seven seats on the new Restorative Justice Commission - Four seats available for terms ending June 30, 2030 and three seats available for terms ending June 30, 2028. The members first appointed shall so classify themselves by lot that the term of three members shall expire in 2028.

Thereafter, these seats would be for 4-year terms
Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Applicant List
B. Written Comments

16.A
Packet Pg. 888
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Restorative Justice Commission
Name Application Date
Cowart, Jaenell 06/17/2026
DeBaca, Gina* 07/07/2026
Frye, Kelli G.* 07/07/2026
Gunn, Karen S. 06/30/2026
Harrington, Schinal J. 07/07/2026
Lindsay, Peta M. 06/24/2026
Scott, Caylee D. 06/23/2026
Wells, Willa F. 07/07/2026
Zepeda, Lainie 06/10/2026
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 9
* Late submittal

16.A.a
Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: Applicant List [Revision 1] (7806 : 16.A. Appointments to seven seats on the Restorative Justice Commission (5 mins.)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Hajar Muqtasid St. Claire <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 11:54 AM
To: councilmtgitems; councilmtgitems; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Lana Negrete; Robbie J5; Janet McKeithen; Joanne Berlin; Joanne Berlin; Angela Scott
Subject: Black Apology Action Steps

EXTERNAL
Please consider the Restorative Justice applicants with more scrutiny. Are they in alignment with the Black Apology given by City Council in November 2022? Please review the following document about tje Black Apology Action Steps.

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Black Apology Action Steps
Thank you,
Hajar Muqtasid St. Claire
Item 16-A
July 14, 2026
Item 16-A
July 14, 2026

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: Written Comments (7806 : 16.A. Appointments to seven seats on the Restorative Justice Commission (5 mins.)) 2 David Yakobson
From: Joanne Berlin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 11:46 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: CRJ input on item 16A

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
Congratulations for your work in establishing a new commission that will be dealing with restorative justice to historically underserved communities of color in Santa Monica. You have heard from the Committee For Racial Justice (CRJ) over the years on many topics and I am pleased to write to you today to share our endorsements of the following persons to serve on this important commission to be named this evening in item 16A on your agenda: Hajar Muqtasid St. Claire, Karen Gunn, Schinal Herrington, Willa Wells, and Alisa Ortiz.

I am writing to you on behalf of the Housing subcommittee of the Committee For Racial Justice. At our recent meeting, we discussed the importance of the new Restorative Justice Commission for Santa Monica and are recommending the five names mentioned above for your consideration.

Thank you for your votes tonight on this landmark commission to address harms done and move us forward in the quest for more equity in Santa Monica.

Joanne Berlin, CRJ Coordinator
Item 16-A
July 14, 2026
Item 16-A
July 14, 2026

16.A.c
Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: Written Comments (7806 : 16.A. Appointments to seven seats on the Restorative Justice Commission (5 mins.)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.B
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, Interim City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Appointments to seven seats on the consolidated Housing & Human Services Commission with three 4-year terms ending on June 30, 2030, three 2-year terms ending on June 30, 2028, and one term ending on June 30, 2027 Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Applicant List
B. Written Comments

16.B
Packet Pg. 892
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Housing & Human Services Commission
Name Application Date
Badawy, Adam 07/01/2026
Cobb, Sara B.^ 07/07/2026
Flanigan, Naomi 07/07/2026
Garcia, Lydia^ 06/11/2026
Hawkins, Patrice* 07/07/2026
Hood, Herschel E.^ 07/06/2026
Kozicki, William 07/02/2026
Morrow, Brett 07/01/2026
Porlas, Dustin J.^ 06/29/2026
Terranova, Michael 07/06/2026
Van Ness, Jon^ 07/06/2026
Wells, Willa F. 07/07/2026
White III, Jack M.^ 06/22/2026
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 13
^
*
Applying to an Affordable Housing program participant seat Late submittal

16.B.a
Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: Applicant List [Revision 2] (7805 : 16.B. Appointments to seven seats on the Housing & Human Services Commission (5 mins.)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Joanne Berlin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 12:03 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: CRJ input on item 16B

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
I am writing to you on behalf of the Housing subcommittee of the Committee For Racial Justice. At our recent meeting, we discussed the candidates for the Housing & Human Services Commission and are recommending two candidates for your consideration. We hope you will vote in item 16B for Brett Morrow and William Kozicki.

Thank you,
Joanne Berlin, CRJ Coordinator
Item 16-B
July 14, 2026
Item 16-B
July 14, 2026

16.B.c
Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: Written Comments (7805 : 16.B. Appointments to seven seats on the Housing & Human Services Commission (5 mins.)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.C
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Oliver Chi, City Manager, City Manager's Office
Subject: Request of Mayor Caroline Torosis that Council approve use of $5,000 of discretionary funds to support the Pico Business Improvement District for its Dia de los Muertos event at Woodlawn Cemetery
Prepared By: Sandra Santiago, Executive Administrator to the City Manager Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Discretionary Funds for Day of the Dead Event
B. 20260714-Council Discretionary Fund Balances

16.C
Packet Pg. 895
Meeting: July 14, 2026
16 ITEM BY MAYOR CAROLINE TOROSIS
Request of Mayor Caroline Torosis that Council approve use of $5,000 of discretionary funds to support the Pico Business Improvement District for its Dia de los Muertos event at Woodlawn Cemetery.

The Pico BID is looking to increase community engagement and plans to host several events for the neighborhood and business community this year, including a new Dia de los Muertos celebration. The event, held in partnership with city-owned Woodlawn Cemetery, is free and open to the public. It will feature family activities, ofrendas and other traditional “Day of the Dead” customs and seeks to pay homage to the community roots and culture of the Pico Neighborhood.

In order to support this new community event, expand cultural programming in the Pico Neighborhood, and help ensure the celebration is accessible to residents at no cost, WE THEREFORE MOVE THAT THE COUNCIL:

1. Allocate $5,000 from Mayor Torosis' share of Council discretionary funds to the Pico Business Improvement District to support costs associated with the Día de los Muertos event at Woodlawn Cemetery.

16.C.a
Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: Discretionary Funds for Day of the Dead Event [Revision 1] (7811 : 16.C. Discretionary Funds for Day of the Dead Event) FY 2026-27 Council Discretionary Funds
Updated: 7/9/2026 Council Discretionary Funds 01100001.532330.Project# FY 2026-27 - New Appropriation and allocations
Entered Into Tyler
Project#
Description Amount Programmed Date Negrete Torosis Hall Raskin Snell Zernitskaya Zwick Unallocated Uncommitted FY 2025-26 funds,rollover to FY 2026-27 13,500.00 88,500.00 $ 13,500.00 $ - $ 18,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 9,500.00 $ 19,000.00 $ - $ FY 2026-27 - New Appropriation* 140,000.00 Budget Adoption FY26-27, 6/23/26 8,330.00 $ 8,330.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 8,330.00 $ 35,010.00 $ Support the Pico Business Improvement District for its Dia de los Muertos event at Woodlawn Cemetery. (5,000.00) Council Meeting, 7/14/26, Item 16A (5,000.00) * Amounts available per Councilmember reflect either 5 or 12 months, depending on the date the Councilmember's term expires.**PENDING COUNCIL APPROVAL $ 223,500.00 Unprogrammed Balance Available $ 16,830.00 21,830.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 29,500.00 $ 27,330.00 $ 35,010.00 $

16.C.b
Packet Pg. 897
Attachment: 20260714-Council Discretionary Fund Balances (7811 : 16.C. Discretionary Funds for Day of