Vision Zero
City Council Meeting
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Direction requested
from City Council
02 Provide feedback on the
neighborhood- support
framework for
Neighborhood Traffic
Calming.
Provide feedback on the
approval process for
traffic-diversion
treatments, including the
Michigan Avenue
Neighborhood
Greenway.
The objective of today’s presentation is to seek City Council direction on the following staff recommendations:
Adopt a modified Safe
System Approach.
Provide feedback on
administrative
implementation
approaches for Personal
Delivery Devices and
Residential Preferential
Parking.
Take the necessary
actions to establish an
Automated Traffic
Enforcement System
Program.
Provide feedback on
including a High-Risk
Network in the Local
Roadway Safety Plan.
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
03 04 05
01 02
06 Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
03 Santa Monica adopted Vision Zero in 2016 with the
goal of eliminating fatal and severe traffic injuries
by 2026.
The goal has not been achieved and Council has
directed staff to prioritize safety in transportation
planning and advance implementable safety
improvements more quickly.
Tonight’s study session is about the framework for
the next phase: safe systems, proactive risk
identification, faster delivery tools, and clearer
implementation authority.
Why are we here
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
04 The City has invested in complete streets,
intersection and signal improvements, speed
management, pedestrian and bicycle
facilities, Safe Routes to School, education
and enforcement.
This work has changed the transportation
network and established many of the tools
that the next phase will build on.
The proposed Safe Systems approach is an
evolution of that work, not a rejection of it.
Ten years of
Vision Zero Work
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
05 Over the past five years, from 2021 -
2025, our community experienced 214
fatal or severe-injury crashes including
21 fatalities.
20 of the 21 fatal crashes involved a
person walking or biking.
Serious crashes are dispersed across
the network rather than concentrated at
a small number of locations.
What the data
tells us
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Santa Monica
is changing its
approach to
roadway
safety
06 Santa Monica’s Vision Zero work
has traditionally been organized
around five areas known as the
“E’s.” The proposed Safe System
Approach builds on that work while
placing greater responsibility on
the design and operation of the
transportation system.
FRAMEWORK
FRAMEWORK
RECOMMENDED
PREVIOUS
EDUCATION
EVALUATION
ENGINEERING
ENFORCEMENT
ENCOURAGEMENT
A Safe System Approach recognizes that people will make mistakes. Streets, speeds, vehicles, and transportation policies should work together so those mistakes are less likely to result in death or serious injury.
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
A modified
Safe System
Approach for
Santa Monica
07 The Safe System Approach
starts with the premise that fatal
and severe traffic injuries are
unacceptable.
People make mistakes.
People are physically vulnerable.
Responsibility for safety is shared.
Safety risks should be addressed
proactively.
Multiple layers of protection are
necessary.
Santa Monica would apply these
principles across Safe Road Users, Safe
Vehicles, Safe Speeds, Safe Roads,
Post-Crash Care, Safe Land Use, and
Safe and Viable Transit.
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
p
ro
a
c tive
De a th a nd se rious injurie s
Re dunda ncy
is sha re d
Hum
a
n
s
Sa
fe ty is
a re una c c e pta b le
is
c ruc ia l
Re sp o nsib ility
m a ke
m ista
ke
s
Hum a ns a re
vulne ra b le
Safe
Road Use rs
Safe
Vehicles
Safe & Viable
Transit
Safe
Speeds
Safe
Land Use
Safe
Roads
Post-C rash
Care
All eleme nts a re
inte rde p ende nt
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Source: The Hidden Danger of Big Pickup Trucks - Consumer Reports Safe Road Users and Safe Vehicles
SAFE ROAD USERS SAFE VEHICLES
Everyone who uses the transportation system
has a role in roadway safety, including people
walking, bicycling, driving, using transit, and using
other forms of mobility.
Vehicle design and safety
features can help prevent
crashes and reduce the severity
of injuries when crashes occur.
Together, these elements support safer decisions while recognizing that individual mistakes will still happen.
08 Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
p
ro
a
c tive
De a th a nd se rious injurie s
Re dunda ncy
is sha re d
Hum
a
n
s
Sa
fe ty is
a re una c c e pta b le
is
c ruc ia l
Re sp o nsib ility
m a ke
m ista
ke
s
Hum a ns a re
vulne ra b le
Safe
Road Use rs
Safe
Vehicles
Safe & Viable
Transit
Safe
Speeds
Safe
Land Use
Safe
Roads
Post-C rash
Care
All eleme nts a re
inte rde p ende nt
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Source: Adapted from San Fransisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) As vehicle speeds increase, the likelihood of a person surviving a crash drops sharply.
Lower
speeds
save
lives.
Safe Speeds and Safe Roads
90% survive
10% fatality risk
60% survive
40% fatality risk
20% survive
80% fatality risk
SAFE SPEEDS SAFE ROADS
The risk of death or serious injury rises sharply as
vehicle speeds increase. Higher speeds create much
greater crash energy, making crashes more severe and
reducing the chance of survival.
*A crash at 40 mph involves about 4 dimes the kinetic energy of a crash at 20 mph.
Streets can be designed and
operated to reduce conflicts,
separate users where
appropriate, and encourage
safer travel speeds and
behavior.
Together, safe speeds and safer street design reduce both the likelihood and consequences of a crash.
20 MPH
30 MPH
40 MPH
09 Speed Matters
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
p
ro
a
c tive
De a th a nd se rious injurie s
Re dunda ncy
is sha re d
Hum
a
n
s
Sa
fe ty is
a re una c c e pta b le
is
c ruc ia l
Re sp o nsib ility
m a ke
m ista
ke
s
Hum a ns a re
vulne ra b le
Safe
Road Use rs
Safe
Vehicles
Safe & Viable
Transit
Safe
Speeds
Safe
Land Use
Safe
Roads
Post-C rash
Care
All eleme nts a re
inte rde p ende nt
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Post-Crash Care & Learning
TheSafe System Approach
extends beyond preventing
crashes.
Post-crash care includes the response
following a collision and the use of crash
information to improve future roadwaysafety decisions.
This ensures that the City continues
learning from serious collisions and
incorporates those lessons into future
planning and improvements.
10 Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Fehr & Peers
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Safe Land Use and Safe and Viable Transit
SAFE LAND USE SAFE AND VIABLE TRANSIT
Land-use patterns influence where and how
people travel. Transportation and
land-use decisions should work together to
identify risks and support safer travel.
Including land use and transit reflects Santa Monica’s broader, locally adapted application of the Safe System Approach.
Safe, viable transit is part of a transportation
system that provides people with practical ways
to travel throughout the community.
EXPOSURE SEVERITY LIKELIHOOD
Separated uses and cul-de-sacs
make every trip long and with a caronly option for most trips, and seas of parking to accomodate it.
Wide, high volume collectors and
arterials carry high speeds right
past homes and schools,
increasingly in larger and heavier
vehicles.
Multilane, far-spaced intersctions
sized for peak hour congestion,
bus pullouts, and strip mall/gas
station driveways multiply conflict
points for all users.
11 p
ro
a
c tive
De a th a nd se rious injurie s
Re dunda ncy
is sha re d
Hum
a
n
s
Sa
fe ty is
a re una c c e pta b le
is
c ruc ia l
Re sp o nsib ility
m a ke
m ista
ke
s
Hum a ns a re
vulne ra b le
Safe
Road Use rs
Safe
Vehicles
Safe & Viable
Transit
Safe
Speeds
Safe
Land Use
Safe
Roads
Post-C rash
Care
All eleme nts a re
inte rde p ende nt
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
12 Traditional collision analysis focuses primarily on locations where crashes have already happened. A Safe System Approach also examines the street characteristics and conditions associated with severe crashes so the City can identify and address risks before another serious collision occurs.
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
From a High Injury
Network to proactive risk
identification
COUNCIL DIRECTION
Prioritize limited funding and staff resources
Identify locations for proactive safety improvements
Coordinate projects and funding
Should a High-Risk Network inform future roadway-safety planning and investment? Track whether investments are addressing the greatest risks Inform the Local Roadway Safety Plan
A High-Risk Network could help Santa Monica:
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
13 Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
What has changed
since February
Near-term work including Chelsea/Santa Monica
Boulevard turn changes, Berkeley speed humps,
Neilson speed tables, Yale and Marine speed-feedback
signs, and approximately 30 stop-sign evaluations.
Staff has advanced no-right-turn-on-red restrictions in downtown, leading pedestrian interval expansion, red
light camera program development, smart curb
management work, and advancement of the
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Toolkit.
On-call design and construction capacity has been
added to shorten the path from identified concern to
field development.
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
14 The Neighborhood Traffic Calming Toolkit will establish a consistent intake, analysis, engagement, design, approval, implementation, and monitoring process for quick-build
neighborhood safety treatments. Community members would identify the transportation problem or concern and staff would validate the concern according to speed data, crash and risk information, vulnerable users, travel volumes, network effects, equity, emergency access, and
implementation feasibility.
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Neighborhood Traffic
Calming
COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED CONCERN POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS
Speeding
Cut through traffic
Poor visibility
Crash potential Traffic diverters
Chicanes
Curb extensions
Speed-management treatments
Other quick-build improvements
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
15 Santa Monica’s long-term greenway network
includes routes identified in the Bicycle Action Plan,
including Michigan Avenue, Washington Avenue,
Ashland Avenue, and 24th Street.
Neighborhood greenways are low-stress bike routes
geared towards riders of all ages and skill levels.
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Neighborhood
Greenways
POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS TARGET GREENWAY VEHICLE VOLUMES & SPEEDS Traffic diverters
Chicanes
Curb extensions
Speed-management treatments
Signage
Intersection treatments to assist
with crossing major streets
NACTO/AASHTO Target
Maximum Speed 20 mph
NACTO/AASHTO Target
Maximum 2,000 ADT
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
16 Neighborhood traffic calming uses physical street
improvements to address speeding, cut-through
traffic, and other neighborhood safety concerns. The
proposed Traffic Calming Toolkit establishes a
consistent process for evaluating requests and
moving appropriate projects forward.
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
A clearer process for
neighborhood traffic
calming
1 Request received and location eligibility confirmed
2 Data reviewed and issue identified
3 Potential improvement and outreach approach identified 4 Project scoped, prioritized, and scheduled
5 Quick-build treatment installed and evaluated
6 Results monitored and reported
• Quick Build
• Evaluation
• Full Build
• Prioritization
• Scheduling
• Submission
• Location Eligibility • Data Screening
• Annual VZ Report
• Levels of improvements
• Outreach
The toolkit would also create standard treatment plans and public information sheets that could be used across neighborhood greenways.
Project Intake
4 Project Scoping
and Budgeting
5 Implementation
1 2
Issue
Identification
3 Improvement
Identification
6 Monitoring and
Reporting
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
17 Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Traffic calming and traffic diversion
are not the same
TRAFFIC CALMING
Primarily changes how people travel on
the street.
Examples: speed humps, cushions, curb extensions, chicanes.
TRAFFIC DIVERSION
Changes where people travel across
the surrounding street network.
Examples: full diverters, partial diverters, turn restrictions. *Because diversion redistributes trips, it requires network-level evaluation with administrative approval.
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
18 Peer example: Somerville, Massachusetts
evaluated traffic redistribution and nearby
intersection operations before
implementing the recent street diversion.
The review also considered emergency and
sanitation access, transit operations,
turning movements, alternate access,
parking/loading, and community input.
Administrative approval can still include
technical review.
What diversion evaluation looks like
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Source: The Elm-Beacon Connector | SomerVoice
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
19 Traffic diversion changes how vehicles
travel through a street or intersection. It
can be used to reduce through-traffic
while maintaining neighborhood access.
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Traffic diversion
would be a new
toolkit option
Half-closure Median diverter
Traffic-diversion treatments would be considered through the City’s project-review, outreach, installation, and evaluation process.
POTENTIAL TREATMENTS
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
20 Because traffic diversion can change how people travel through a neighborhood, staff is seeking Council direction on the level of community support that should be required.
For traffic-diversion treatments, staff proposes a neighborhood petition demonstrating:
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Proposed Santa Monica
Diversion pathway
support in R-1 areas support in areas other than R-1
The petition would be considered alongside location eligibility, data screening, project scoping, outreach, implementation, and evaluation. Locations not already identified in Council-adopted plans, such as the Bicycle Action Plan, would also require Council approval.
What level of neighborhood support
should be required?
What approval process should apply to
traffic-diversion treatments?
How should the framework apply to the
Michigan Avenue Neighborhood
Greenway?
COUNCIL DIRECTION
51% 25%
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
21 Curb space is a limited public resource that must serve residents, businesses, deliveries, transit, accessibility, passenger pickup, micromobility, and public space.
A data-driven approach could help the City:
Staff will return to City Council with a recommendation for a smart curb-management contract award.
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
The curb is part of the
safety system
Understand how curb space is being used
Reduce double parking and curb conflicts
Support businesses and deliveries
Improve transit reliability
Protect pedestrians, bicyclists, and ADA access
Adapt curb uses as demand changes
Potential tools include a digital curb inventory, utilization data, enhanced enforcement, and an initial pilot area with
opportunities for expansion.
Short-term parking
Commercial deliveries
TNC, AV passenger pick-up/drop-off
Transit stops
Bike parking and micromobility
EV charging
ADA access
Freight and tour buses vehicles
Pedestrian, activations, and public space
NEXT STEP
One Curb with many competing needs
🚗
📦
🚕
🚌
🚲
⚡
♿
🚚
🌴
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
22 Residential Preferential Parking limits parking on designated streets to vehicles with residential permits during certain times.
Under the current framework, many changes must return to City Council. Staff is seeking direction on an approach that would preserve Council’s policy role while allowing qualifying changes to be implemented administratively.
Modernizing
Residential
Preferential Parking
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
POTENTIAL APPROACH COUNCIL DIRECTION
Council establishes eligible areas, standard restrictions, and program requirements.
Council pre-authorizes implementation within the established framework.
Staff establishes or modifies qualifying zones administratively.
Staff may adjust restrictions in response to parking demand, commercial needs, and safety or mobility projects.
Proposals outside the Council-approved framework continue to require Council consideration.
How much flexibility should staff have?
What parameters should guide staff
decisions?
When could spaces be made available
for public or commercial uses?
Which changes should continue to
require Council approval?
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
23 Personal Delivery Devices are small devices
used to deliver food and other goods through the
public right-of-way.
Santa Monica’s current framework restricts autonomous and semi-autonomous operation. Administrative regulations allow Level 3 automation but prohibit Level 4 and higher, requiring direct human piloting.
POLICY AREAS FOR CONSIDERATION
Modernizing the
Personal Delivery
Device framework
Permitted levels of autonomy Fleet caps
Staff is seeking direction on how the program should respond to evolving technology and potential new market entrants.
Program fees Advertising Data-sharing requirements
Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
24 Policy area Current framework
City rules restrict autonomous and semi-autonomous
operation.
Potential direction
Amend the Municipal Code and administrative regulations to establish permitted levels of automation.
Current rules and potential changes
Fleet size
Autonomy
Advertising
Data sharing
Program fees
What levels of automation
should be permitted?
No specific operator, device, or public-right-of-way
usage fees.
On-device advertising is heavily restricted.
No specific per-operator or total fleet caps.
Operators provide operating data requested by the City.
What fleet caps, fees, advertising
rules, and reporting requirements
are appropriate?
What safeguards are needed to
protect sidewalk access and the
public right-of-way?
Establish fees to offset administration and enforcement costs.
Consider revised advertising rules or revenue-sharing
requirements.
Strengthen reporting, including information about
sidewalk conditions and obstructions.
Establish fleet caps to prevent clutter and overcrowding.
COUNCIL
DIRECTION
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
25 Improve
compliance with
traffic signals
Reduce
An Automated Traffic Enforcement System uses
cameras and related technology to identify vehicles
that enter an intersection after a traffic signal has
turned red.
Under California’s Safer Streets Act, the proposed system would support a future Santa Monica red-light camera program.
Protect
pedestrians, bicyclists,
and drivers
The system captures vehicle
and license-plate information,
not the driver’s face.
unsafe driving
Violations are civil infractions
reviewed outside the Police
Department.
City staff reviews potential
violations before citations
are issued.
predictable and broadly
applied enforcement
Tonight’s action would authorize
the City to establish the program.
It would not select a vendor or
approve final camera locations.
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Establishing an
Automated Traffic
Enforcement System
The program Provide
is intended to:
PROGRAM SAFEGUARDS
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
26 Establishing an Automated Traffic Enforcement System requires several separate decisions and implementation steps. The proposed enabling ordinance is the first step; site selection, contracting, implementation, and enforcement would follow through a separate process.
01 02 03
Establishing the program is the first step
ENABLING
ORDINANCE
Authorizes the City to
use an Automated
Traffic Enforcement
System to identify
traffic-signal
violations.
POTENTIAL SITE-SELECTION CRITERIA
Pattern of red-light violations; demonstrated crash risk; engineering suitability; City jurisdiction and operational control; presence of vulnerable roadway users; community feedback; and structural risk factors such as traffic speeds and volumes.
SITE EVALUATION
AND CONTRACTING
Conduct objective safety analysis
Identify two recommended
intersections
Execute a limited-duration
vendor contract
Establish a dedicated
fund for citation revenue
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
04 Infrastructure installed
60-day warning period
Program revenue is used for safer
streets and traffic-calming
measures
IMPLEMENTATION
AND ENFORCEMENT
IMPACT REPORT
& OUTREACH
Public Hearing approving
Impact Report
Vendor and City Staff
complete outreach with
local stakeholders
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
27 Establish the policy framework
and provide direction on
implementation approaches.
Update crash analysis, High
Injury Network, Proposed HighRisk Network,Countermeasures and project prioritization
Projects and programs,
Responsibilities, Timelines,
Funding and resource needs,
Performance Measures
What happens next
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Tonight
Local Roadway
Safety Plan
Updated
Vision Zero
Action Plan
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Direction requested
from City Council
28 Provide feedback on the
neighborhood- support
framework for
Neighborhood Traffic
Calming.
Provide feedback on the
approval process for
traffic-diversion
treatments, including the
Michigan Avenue
Neighborhood
Greenway.
Adopt a modified Safe
System Approach.
Provide feedback on
administrative
implementation
approaches for Personal
Delivery Devices and
Residential Preferential
Parking.
Take the necessary
actions to establish an
Automated Traffic
Enforcement System
Program.
Provide feedback on
including a High-Risk
Network in the Local
Roadway Safety Plan.
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
03 04 05
01 02
06 Staff recommends that the City Council:
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
29 Direction requested from City Council
Introduce for first reading an ordinance creating Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 3.12.540 and establishing an Automated Traffic Enforcement System Program to
detect traffic-signal violations.
Direct staff to monitor state legislation related to
automated speed enforcement and evaluate
implementation opportunities if Santa Monica becomes
eligible.
Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant
environmental effect under Section 15061(b)(3), the
common-sense exemption of the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines.
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Thank You!
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
30 Over the past six months, staff has begun applying this more implementation-focused approach through a series of nearterm roadway-safety actions. The projects below represent the first wave of implementation delivered through the quickbuild capacity established under the Realignment.
Project
Chelsea Ave / Santa Monica Blvd left-turn improvement
Description
Quick-build treatment to manage left-turn conflicts and improve pedestrian crossing safety at the intersection.
Status
Deployed
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Berkeley Street speed humps
Neilson Way speed tables
No-right-turn-on-red signage
Pedestrian recall installations
2nd & 4th Street curb transition
Neighborhood diverter pilot program
Speed feedback signs – Yale St & Marine St
Stop-sign evaluations (approx. 30 intersections citywide) Vertical deflection to reduce operating speeds through physical street design.
Vertical deflection sized for a higher-volume roadway context, with monitoring of transit and emergency operations.
Driver feedback signage to reinforce target speeds on residential corridors.
Evaluation of approximately 30 intersections for potential stop-sign installation against adopted criteria to reduce conflict severity.
Turn restrictions at selected intersections to reduce vehicle-pedestrian conflicts during crossing phases.
Signal operations changes so pedestrian phases are served automatically without push-button actuation.
Conversion of existing 15-minute parking spaces to designated loading and passenger drop-off zones as an interim step while Smart Curb Management procurement and enabling authority are completed.
Resident-initiated and program-based diversion treatments under the approval framework described in this report.
In design
Deployed
Under evaluation
Under construction
Framework outlined in this
report
Deployed at various locations
Deployed at various locations
In process of deployment
Recent roadway-safety actions
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
Preliminary
Red Light
Camera
intersection
analysis
31 Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
32 Signal Upgrades
(LPI, APS, and Software Upgrade)
LPI
Signal Software Upgrades
Completed Intersection
Older Version of Maxtime
In Progress Intersection
Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS)
Yes
Planned
Requested
Signal Modifications
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
33 Speed Countermeasures
(Speed Feedback Signs, Speed Humps,
2024 Speed Survey adjustments)
Speed Reduction Improvements
Speed Feedback Signs
Installed
Planned
In Review
Requested
Speed Humps
Installed
Planned
In Review
Requested
Speed Changed in 2024 E&TS
Speed Increase by 5 MPH
Speed Decrease by 5 MPH
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
34 Right of Way Concerns
(AllWay StopControl,CrossTraffic
Does Not Stop, No Right on Red)
Right of Way Concerns
All Way Stops
Installed
Planned
In Review
Requested
No Turn On Red
Completed
Planned
In Review
Requested
Cross Traffic Does Not Stop
Installed
Planned
In Review
Requested
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Residential
Preferential
Parking Map
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
35 Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
2011 Bike
Action Plan 20-
Year Vision
with
Greenways
and locations
identified for
Enhanced
Bicycle Access
Vision Zero Study Session
City Council Meeting
36 Item 11-B
September 8, 2026
Item 11-B
September 8, 2026