Cities Index.
Agenda packet, regular meeting

Santa Paula City Council
January 18, 2023

Document
Agenda packet, regular meeting
Meeting
January 18, 2023
Body
Santa Paula City Council
Original file
49.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net. That file is the official record.

City of Santa Paula
City Council

MAYOR ANDY SOBEL

VICE MAYOR LESLIE CORNEJO

COUNCILMEMBER JENNY CROSSWHITE

COUNCILMEMBER CARLOS JUAREZ
COUNCILMEMBER PEDRO A. CHAVEZ

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE

SANTA PAULA CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18, 2023
6:30 PM - City Council Regular Meeting

SANTA PAULA CITY HALL
970 VENTURA STREET
SANTA PAULA, CA 93060

JULIE LATSHAW, CITY CLERK

DAN SINGER, CITY MANAGER

MONICA CASTILLO, INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY
City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 1

BRINGING ITEMS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
You are invited to participate in all Regular City Council meetings. Agendas are posted in the front of Santa Paula City Hall, 970 Ventura Street, Santa Paula, 72 hours in advance of the scheduled meetings. The City Council's regular meetings start at 6:30 p.m. the first and third Wednesday of each month in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 970 Ventura Street in Santa Paula.

HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN PERSON DURING THE MEETING: If you wish to speak at a City Council meeting, please fill out a Public Comment Form noting your name and address and submit the form to the City Clerk. Include the Agenda item number, when appropriate. Public comments are limited to 3 minutes.

1. Items Not on the Agenda: If you wish to discuss an item which is not scheduled on the Agenda, you may address the City Council during Public Comment. Please realize that due to the limitations placed on the City Council by provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council ordinarily cannot take action on any item that is not on the agenda. Because of these restrictions, expect that matters that you identify during public comment will be referred to staff or considered on a future agenda.

2. Agenda Items: Items being considered by the City Council may appear on the Consent Calendar, as an Action Item, or as a Public Hearing. Public comments on each type of item are handled differently, as explained below:
a. For items appearing on the Consent Calendar, please submit a Public Comment Form before the Council takes action on the Consent Calendar. Items that receive a Public Comment Form may be pulled from the Consent Calendar by the Mayor and discussed separately by the City Council.
b. For items appearing as an Action Item, the Mayor will announce the Agenda item and request the staff report, the staff member responsible will give a brief summary of the report; the City Council will have an opportunity to ask questions of staff; members of the public will be given an opportunity to comment on the item and ask additional questions (all members of the public should speak directly into the microphone at the speaker’s platform); and the City Council will discuss the item and then take appropriate action.
c. For items on which a Public Hearing is scheduled, the Mayor will open the public hearing and receive the staff report; members of the public will be given an opportunity to comment on the item and ask additional questions (all members of the public should speak directly into the microphone at the speaker’s platform); the City Council will discuss the item; and the Mayor will close the public hearing after City Council action.

HOW TO PARTICIPATE BEFORE THE MEETING: Members of the public are encouraged to submit email correspondence on any agenda item by sending an email to [email protected]. All public correspondence received by 3:00 p.m. (PT) on the meeting date will be provided to the legislative body before the meeting. Public Comments received after 3:00 p.m. will be provided to the legislative body the next day.

Your Participation in this meeting is in the public domain; meetings are cablecast; minutes of this meeting will reflect your participation in this meeting and are posted on the city’s website.

PLEASE NOTE: Be advised that if you bring a legal challenge to an action, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the meeting described in this Agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or before the meeting.

Any action is subject to the ninety-day time period set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.6.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 2

1. CALL TO ORDER
REMINDER: in order to minimize distractions during public meetings, all personal communication devices should be turned off or put in a non-audible mode.

2. INVOCATION

3. FLAG SALUTE

4. ROLL CALL

5. CLOSED SESSION REPORT

6. PRESENTATIONS

6.A ALL CHILDREN THRIVE (ACT) PRESENTATION

6.B NATIONAL MENTORING MONTH PROCLAMATION

7. PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of the public may comment on any item not appearing on the agenda that is within the subject-matter jurisdiction of the City Council. A Public Comment Form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the beginning of the Public Comment period in order to be recognized to speak. Individuals submitting Public Comment Forms after the beginning of the Public Comment period will not be allowed to speak at this time, but may be recognized to speak by the Mayor at the conclusion of the meeting. Individual Councilmembers may briefly respond to Public Comments or ask questions for clarification. The City Council may direct staff to report to the City Council on the item at a later meeting. For items appearing on the Agenda, the public will be invited to make comments at the time the item comes up for City Council consideration. If a member of the public wishes to address a Consent Calendar item, please submit a Public Comment Form for that item. It may then be discussed separately by the Council, and the public will be invited to make comments at that time. At all times, please use the microphone and write your name and address on the Public Comment Form provided.

8. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS

9. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
Background information has been provided to the City Council on all matters listed under the Consent Calendar and these items are considered to be routine by the City Council and are normally approved by one motion. If discussion is requested by a participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (805) 933-4208. Notification 48 hours before the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 35, 102-35.104 ADA Title II). Written materials distributed to the City Council within 72 hours of the City Council meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk’s office.

REGULAR MATTERS - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 3 Councilmember on any item, or a member of the public wishes to comment on an item, that item may be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.

10.A EXTEND APPROVAL TO HOLD VIRTUAL CITY COUNCIL, COMMISSION,

COMMITTEE, BOARD AND OTHER CITY BODIES, MEETINGS
PURSUANT TO AB 361
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Extend Approval to hold Virtual City Council, Commission, Board, and other City Bodies Meetings Pursuant to AB 361.

10.B Approval of Minutes
City Council Closed Session Minutes for December 21, 2022 City Council Regular Minutes for December 21, 2022

10.C DECEMBER 2022 WARRANTS AND CERTIFICATIONS
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Review and accept the "Certification of Accounts Payable" for the accounts payable payment cycles for December 2022, starting check number 332765 and ending check number 333099.

2. Review and accept the "Certification of Salaries" for the pay period ending date December 2nd, 2022, through December 16th, 2022.

10.D APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH NATURAL GREEN LANDSCAPE, INC. FOR

CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Recommends City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to a Maintenance Services Agreement with Natural Green Landscape, Inc. for citywide landscaping services, changing the scope of services, extending the term to June 30, 2026, and increasing the not-to-exceed amount from $48,000 to $108,000 annually.

10.E SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO.1320 AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 16.58.010 REGARDING REGULATION OF BUSINESS

SIGNAGE FOR ESTABLISHMENTS OFFERING THE SALE OF ALCOHOL RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO.1320 AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION 16.58.010 REGARDING REGULATION OF BUSINESS

SIGNAGE FOR ESTABLISHMENTS OFFERING THE SALE OF

ALCOHOL
Presented by: James Mason, Economic and Community Development City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 4 Director

10.F SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1321 RELATING TO AN

EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC

VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No.1321 relating to an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations.

10.G APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MIKE ARANDA FOR POLICE

DEPARTMENT PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
(1) Approve the First Amended and Restated Professional Services Agreement with Mike Aranda for Police Department Project Management Services
Presented by: Interim Police Chief Don Aguilar

11. PUBLIC HEARING
Verification of posting notice by City Clerk
Declaration of conflicts (if any)
Declaration of ex parte contacts (if any)
Open public hearing
Staff presentation
Discussion and action
Close public hearing

11.A PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1326 ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING
STANDARDS CODE AND THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE CODE
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
(1) Open the public hearing to receive testimonial and documentary evidence; (2) Close the public hearing;
(3) Adopt Ordinance No. 1326 adopting by reference the 2022 California Building Standards Code and the 2021 International Property Maintenance Code;
(4) Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the adopted ordinance within fifteen days following adoption;
(5) Take such additional related action that may be desirable.

Presented by: James Mason, Community Development Director City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 5

11.B DISTRICTING – THIRD PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE INPUT AND

TESTIMONY REGARDING PROPOSED DRAFT DISTRICT MAPS

SUBMITTED, COMPOSITION OF COUNCIL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, AND

COMMUNITIES OF INTEREST
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Receive an updated presentation from staff, Dr. Justin Levitt of National Demographic Corporation (NDC), and Sydni Overly of Tripepi Smith regarding the process for developing options for City Council voting districts, to be implemented in November, 2024;

2. Consider, discuss, and provide direction or revisions to draft Council District Maps submitted;

3. Conduct a public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and

4. Receive and file public input on composition of Council District boundaries, communities of interest, and draft maps.

Presented by: Jonathan Royas, Management Analyst
Dr. Justin Levitt, NDC
Sydni Overly, Tripepi Smith

12. ACTION ITEMS

12.A CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 7437 IN SUPPORT OF A

COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION CENTER IN SANTA PAULA
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 7437 in support of the Ventura County Community College District acquisition of property to construct a Community College Education Center in Santa Paula.

Presented by: Jonathan Royas

13. ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS

13.A FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council Review Future Agenda Items.

Presented by: Dan Singer, City Manager

14. CLOSED SESSION

15. ADJOURNMENT
City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 6 State of California )-
County of Ventura )- ss
City of Santa Paula )-
I declare under penalty of perjury that I posted this City Council Agenda on the bulletin board near the front door of City Hall, 970 Ventura Street, Santa Paula, California.

On_________________ at______________Signed:_________________________ Julie Latshaw
City Clerk
City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 7 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
Subject: EXTEND APPROVAL TO HOLD VIRTUAL CITY COUNCIL,

COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, BOARD AND OTHER CITY BODIES,
MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361
Date: January 18, 2023
Agenda Item: 10.A

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Extend Approval to hold Virtual City Council, Commission, Board, and other City Bodies Meetings Pursuant to AB 361.

BACKGROUND:

With the expiration of the Governor's Executive Order, the Governor signed into law Assembly Bill 361. Effective October 1, 2021, AB 361 allows local governments to continue to conduct remote virtual meetings so long as there is a state-proclaimed state of emergency and the legislative body makes mandatory findings.

On October 6, 2021, the Council unanimously voted to continue virtual City Council meetings under AB 361 by adopting Resolution No. 7369. In November, however, the Council returned to in-person meetings and allowed Resolution No. 7369 to lapse.

On January 19, 2022, the Council again unanimously voted to continue virtual City Council, Commission, Board, and other City Bodies meeting under AB 361 by adopting Resolution No. 7384.

In order to extend the ability to hold virtual City Council, Commission, Board, and other City Bodies Meetings pursuant to AB 361, the City Council must make the findings and determinations under AB 361 to again allow the Council to meet virtually.

ANALYSIS:

In order to continue to qualify for AB 361's waiver of Brown Act teleconference meeting requirements, the City Council must, within thirty (30) days of its first meeting under AB 361, and every thirty (30) days thereafter, make findings that (a) state or local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing, or that (b) an in-person meeting would constitute an imminent risk to the safety of attendees. 8 The above conditions continue to exist at this time, and staff recommends the City Council by motion reconfirm the findings and determinations made in Resolution No. 7384 so that the City Council may continue to meet virtually under AB 361.

Lastly, it is important to note that AB 361 is optional. If the City Council wishes, it may meet in person.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

None.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

OPTIONS:

1. Approve staff recommendations; or

2. Without a majority vote of the City Council every 30 days adopting the mandatory findings under AB 361, Resolution No. 7384 approving virtual meetings pursuant to AB 361 would lapse, requiring Council to hold in-person meetings until extended by a majority vote.

ATTACHMENTS:
9 CITY OF SANTA PAULA
City Council Closed Session Meeting
December 21, 2022, 6:00 PM

MINUTES

CLOSED SESSION - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Sobel called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm
2) ROLL CALL
Members Present: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, and Pedro A Chavez
Members Absent: Carlos Juarez
Councilmember Juarez absent during roll call, though plans to be present by zoom during item 4.A in closed session.
3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
4) CLOSED SESSION

4.A) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - Pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(d)(1) - Schladetzky v. City of Santa Paula, et al., Ventura County Superior Court Case No. 56-2022- 00563854-CU-OE-VTA
Interim City Attorney Monica Castillo announced council will recess to Closed Session.
5) CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Interim City Attorney Monica Castillo reported Councilmember Juarez was present through zoom during closed session and announced there was no reportable action.
6) ADJOURNMENT
10 Mayor Sobel adjourned the meeting to the Regular City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m.

Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
ATTEST:
11 CITY OF SANTA PAULA
City Council Regular Meeting
December 21, 2022, 6:30 PM

MINUTES

REGULAR MATTERS - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Sobel called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
2) INVOCATION
Julie Tumamait-Stenslie, Chumash Elder, provided the Invocation. 3) FLAG SALUTE
Councilmember Crosswhite led the flag salute.
4) ROLL CALL
Councilmember Juarez was present through zoom.

Members Present: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Carlos Juarez, and Pedro A Chavez
5) CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Interim City Attorney Monica Castillo reported Councilmember Juarez was present through zoom during the closed session item:

4.A CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGAITON - Pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(d)(1) - Schladetzky v. City of Santa Paula, et al., Ventura County Superior Court Case No, 56-2022-00563854-CUOE-VTA.

There was no reportable action taken.
6) PRESENTATIONS

6.A) PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
Parks & Recreation Director Greg Barnes provided the Parks & Recreation Department Activity Report.
12 6.B) FINANCE DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY REPORT
Finance Director Christy Ramirez presented the Finance Department Quarterly Report.
7) PUBLIC COMMENT
Caitlin Brooks with Ventura County Transportation Commission provided an update on their future draft plans and announced the youth ride free program, providing flyers for the public.
8) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Crosswhite:

Attended Social Justice Ad Hoc; Ventura Regional Sanitation District; League Lab Speaker Series with the California Oil Museum Foundation; Coffee with a Cop event at Starbucks; and employee luncheon.

Councilmember Juarez:

Attended Retirement for Sheriff Bill Ayub; participated in Rotary collecting food and toys for the annual Christmas baskets; Santa Tours; Holiday Street Fair; and Hospice Light up Life.

Councilmember Chavez:

No reports at this time.

Vice Mayor Cornejo:

Attended the live play at the Theater Center; Harding Park Commission; League Lab at Oil Museum, employee luncheon; Property Business Improvement District; Senior Lunch at the Senior Center; and followed the Santa Tour.

Mayor Sobel:

Attended Ventura County Transportation Commission Heritage Valley meeting; Cycle Cal Coast virtual meeting; De Colores; and Santa Tour. 9) CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Dan Singer:

Participated in Santa Tour; reported city has started negotiations on the Oil Museum building, city is recipient of $1,500,000 for expansion of bike trail, recipient of almost $200,000 to better map out broadband and internet access needs, and this week we will see when the Federal budget is signed, that the city will be the recipient of $2,000,000 to go toward the Harvard underground utility project.
10) CONSENT CALENDAR

10.A) EXTEND APPROVAL TO HOLD VIRTUAL CITY COUNCIL,

COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, BOARD AND OTHER CITY BODIES,
MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361

10.B) Approval of Minutes
City Council Closed Session Minutes for December 7, 2022 13 City Council Regular Minutes for December 7, 2022

10.C) NOVEMBER 2022 WARRANTS AND CERTIFICATIONS

10.D) REQUEST AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PERSONNEL TO ATTEND THE 2023 CHANDLER, ARIZONA LAW ENFORCEMENT EXPLORER

TACTICAL COMPETITION
This item was pulled for discussion and vote separately. Police Chief Aguilar answered questions for Council.

Motion: Approve Authorizing Santa Paula Police Department personnel, acting as chaperones to ten Explorers, to travel to and attend the 2023 Law Enforcement Explorer Tactical Competition in Chandler, Arizona.

Moved by Pedro A Chavez, seconded by Carlos Juarez
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Carlos Juarez, Pedro A Chavez

10.E) SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH JHD PLANNING, LLC FOR SERVICES RELATED
TO THE CITY’S 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT

10.F) SKID STEER EQUIPMENT PURCHASE OF A NOT-TO-EXCEED
AMOUNT OF $100,000

10.G) NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WATER RECYCLING FACILITY

ANOXIC AND AEROBIC TANKS REHABILITATION PROJECT (CIP
NO. 9341)
Councilmember Juarez requested item 10D be pulled for discussion and separate vote.

Motion: Approve Consent Calendar items 10A, 10C, 10E, 10F, and approve as amended items 10B with typographical correction to minutes and 10G with correction to correct signer name on the Notice of Completion.

Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Leslie Cornejo
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Carlos Juarez, Pedro A Chavez
11) PUBLIC HEARING

11.A) AMENDMENT TO HARVEST CFD NO. 1 SPECIAL TAX AND BONDED

INDEBTEDNESS LIMIT AND DECLARATION OF THE RESULTS OF

ELECTION TO CERTIFY AMENDMENT
Councilmember Chavez recused himself from this item.

Finance Director Christy Ramirez presented this item
Mayor Sobel opened the public hearing. With no public comment, Mayor Sobel closed the public hearing.
14 City Clerk Julie Latshaw announced all of the owners of the subject property have voted "yes".

Motion: Approve Resolution No. 7435 authorizing amendment of the levy of a special tax and bonded indebtedness limit for Improvement Areas B & C of Harvest Community Facilities District No. 1, and Resolution No. 7436 Declaring Results of an Election for Amendment of Special Tax and Bond Authorization, Determining Validity of Prior Proceedings and Directing Recording of Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien.

Moved by Carlos Juarez, seconded by Leslie Cornejo
Vote: Motion carried 4-0
Yes: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Carlos Juarez

11.B) RESOLUTION NO. 7431 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PROJECT 22-TM-01, VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6074
Councilmember Chavez recused himself from this item.

Community & Economic Development Director James Mason presented this item.

Mayor Sobel opened the public hearing. David Lauletta answered questions for Council. With no other comments, Mayor Sobel closed the public hearing.

Motion: Approve Resolution No. 7431 approving amendments to the Conditions of Approval for Project 22-TM-01, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6074.

Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Leslie Cornejo
Vote: Motion carried 4-0
Yes: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Carlos Juarez

11.C) ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER

16.227 OF THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNITS
Mayor Sobel opened the public hearing.

Community & Economic Development Director, James Mason and Assistant Planner, Anna Arroyo presented this item.

With no public comments, Mayor Sobel closed the public hearing.

Motion: Approve Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Paula, California Amending Chapter 16.227 of the City of Santa Paula Municipal Code Relating to Accessory Dwelling Units and Determining the Ordinance to be Exempt from CEQA.

Moved by Carlos Juarez, seconded by Pedro A Chavez
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Carlos Juarez, Pedro A Chavez
15 11.D) INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO.1320 AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 16.58.010 REGARDING REGULATION OF

BUSINESS SIGNAGE FOR ESTABLISHMENTS OFFERING THE

SALE OF ALCOHOL
Mayor Sobel opened the public hearing. With no public comments, Mayor Sobel closed the public hearing.

Community & Economic Development Director James Mason presented this item.

Motion: Approve introduction and waive the first reading of Ordinance No. 1320, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA PAULA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION

16.58.010 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND USE CONDITIONS)
OF CHAPTER 16.58 (ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES) OF THE

SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO RESTRICTIONS ON
BUSINESS SIGNS ADVERTISING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES.

Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Pedro A Chavez
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Carlos Juarez, Pedro A Chavez

11.E) INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1321 RELATING TO AN

EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR

ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS
Mayor Sobel opened the public hearing. With no public comments, Mayor Sobel closed the public hearing.

Community & Economic Development Director James Mason presented this item.

Motion: Approve as amended introduction and waive first reading of Ordinance No.1321, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
PAULA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 16.77 TO TITLE XVI OF

THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO AN

EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR
ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS, amending to strike under Section 1.C the words "environmentally damaging".

Moved by Pedro A Chavez, seconded by Carlos Juarez
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Carlos Juarez, Pedro A Chavez
12) ACTION ITEMS

12.A) INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1326 ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND THE
2021 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
16 Community & Economic Development Director James Mason presented this item.

Motion: Approve 1. Introduce and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 1326, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
PAULA AMENDING SECTIONS 150.001, 150.015, 150.025, 150.045, 150.055, 150.075, 150.085, 150.150, 150.160, 150.170, 150.180, AND 150.190 OF CHAPTER 150 OF THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITION OF THE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATIONS, TITLE 24), INCLUDING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; VOLUMES 1 AND 2 OF THE 2022
CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA
RESIDENTIAL CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE;
THE 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 2022
CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY
CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; THE 2022
CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; THE 2022
CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; AND THE 2021
INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE;

2. Schedule a public hearing to consider adopting the proposed Ordinance at the City Council’s regular meeting of January 18, 2023; and

3. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed Ordinance and provide notice of the public hearing twice at least 14 days before the public hearing at which the proposed Ordinance is to be considered for adoption.

Moved by Leslie Cornejo, seconded by Carlos Juarez
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Carlos Juarez, Pedro A Chavez

12.B) BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR PROPERTY ASSESMENT AND DUE

DILLIGENCE PROCESS
Councilmember Juarez recused himself from this item.

Parks and Recreation Director Greg Barnes presented this item.

Councilmember Crosswhite proposed using the name "Union Oil Building Use Committee", of which the member chosen to the ad-hoc committee will be chosen under item 12D.

Motion: Approve budget appropriation not to exceed the amount of $30,000 for both revenues and expenses to perform due diligence on the acquisition of property as noted in the fiscal impact section of this report, and appoint one or two members of the Council to serve on an ad-hoc basis to assist in evaluation of the property transition and use of the facility. Motion to include calling the ad-hoc "Union Oil Building Use Committee".

Moved by Pedro A Chavez, seconded by Jenny Crosswhite
17 Vote: Motion carried 4-0
Yes: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Pedro A Chavez

12.C) ADOPTION OF 2023 COUNCIL MEETING CALENDAR
Motion: Approve City Council Meeting calendar for 2023, cancelling July 5, July 19, September 20, December 20 and January 3, 2024, along with closing City Hall between Christmas and New Years.

Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Leslie Cornejo
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Andy Sobel, Leslie Cornejo, Jenny Crosswhite, Carlos Juarez, Pedro A Chavez

12.D) APPOINTMENTS TO THE MAYOR’S STANDING AND AD HOC

COMMITTEES
Council approved moving item 12.D before 12.C.

Council reviewed and made appointments to the Mayor's Standing and Ad Hoc Committees.
13) ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS

13.A) FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Chavez explained that at the last Council meeting, Community College Education Center was added for a future agenda item. Councilmember Chavez provided an update on that item, anouncing he met with the City Manager who is working with staff based on a draft put together for the resolution for the January 18, 2023 Council meeting.

Councilmember Chavez also requested a future agenda item for rent stabilization measures on tenant protections and landlord responsibilities. He would like to have a study group working with staff.

Council discussed this could be part of the Housing and Homeless Committee.

Councilmember Crosswhite would like staff to come back with a discussion and analysis about the potential recording Planning Commission meetings. Council was in agreement.

City Manager Dan Singer announced there will be several special meetings related to the strategic planning process, coming up February through April.
14) ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Sobel adjourned the meeting at 10:04 p.m.

ATTEST:
18 Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
19 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Christy Ramirez, Finance Director
Subject: DECEMBER 2022 WARRANTS AND CERTIFICATIONS
Date: January 18, 2023
Agenda Item: 10.C

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Review and accept the "Certification of Accounts Payable" for the accounts payable payment cycles for December 2022, starting check number 332765 and ending check number 333099.

2. Review and accept the "Certification of Salaries" for the pay period ending date December 2nd, 2022, through December 16th, 2022.

BACKGROUND:

This is the certification (separation of duties between the "preparer from the reviewer") Presented in the attached documents:
a) CERTIFICATION OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS by check number range and dates. It also discloses any voided checks.
b) EXPENSE REPORTS showing the amounts and funds accounts payable came from The "Check Report" depicts the following columns:
c) AP-ACCOUNTS PAYABLE for vendors (non-City staff) by the vendor number, vendor name, payment date, payment amount and check number (entitled 'number') d) PY-PAYROLL for benefit payments, insurance, retirement, etc. Benefits payable on behalf of City staff.
e) Bank Code Summary by payment type
f) Fund Summary by fund the accounts payables utilized

CERTIFICATION OF SALARIES
20 This is the certification (separation of duties between "preparer" and the "reviewer") of salaries and benefits (payroll checks) by fund. It lists salary (payroll) issued checks by beginning and ending check number, payroll ending dates December 2nd, 2022, through December 16th, 2022.

ANALYSIS:

See the attachments for expense breakdown by respective fund.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

FISCAL IMPACTS:

OPTIONS:

Receive and file December 2022 Certifications of Accounts Payable Checks and Certification of Salaries.

ATTACHMENTS:

December 2022 Warrants and Certifications.pdf
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Greg Barnes, Parks and Recreation Director
Subject: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH NATURAL GREEN LANDSCAPE, INC. FOR

CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING SERVICES
Date: January 18, 2023
Agenda Item: 10.D

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Recommends City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to a Maintenance Services Agreement with Natural Green Landscape, Inc. for citywide landscaping services, changing the scope of services, extending the term to June 30, 2026, and increasing the not-to-exceed amount from $48,000 to $108,000 annually.

BACKGROUND:

In July of 2021, the Parks & Recreation Department assumed responsibility for all tree and landscape maintenance citywide. Over the past 12 months or so, staff has been assessing various areas of the City that require contracted landscape services.

During the month of August 2022, staff solicited bids for citywide landscape services. As a result, the City received two responses. Those bid responses are attached as Exhibit B to this staff report. The bid results were as follows:

Venco Western, Inc. - $144,324.00
Natural Green Landscape - $56,400
The bids included all areas of the city with the exception of the new Harvest Development.

As part of the Development Agreement between the City and the Harvest project developer, the City is required to take over landscaped areas within the Harvest Development once the developer has met their responsibility for these areas and the City is satisfied with their current condition.

As a result of the bids received, the City entered into an agreement with Natural Green Landscape, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $48,000 annually with an expiration date of June 61 30, 2023.

ANALYSIS:

Staff has spent the last few months evaluating Natural Green Landscape in regard to their quality of work and responsiveness. As a result of that evaluation staff is recommending that the length of the agreement be extended and that the not-to-exceed amount be increased.

The increased compensation amount will allow staff to continue to accept new landscaped areas of the Harvest Development as they are turned over to the City. If the not-to-exceed amount of $108,000 needs to be increased, staff will return to City Council with that request.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is not a goal or objective in City Council’s two-year Strategic Plan; however, it is vital in order for us to provide well-maintained and safe landscaped areas throughout the city.

We accomplish this by providing services both through agreements with qualified contractors and by the efforts of dedicated City staff.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

The costs for the current agreement were approved as part of the City Council FY 22-23 budget. $56,400 of the agreement is located in the following line items:
280-5-5022-202 - $37,200
500-5-5028-202 - $4,800
610-5-5063-209 - $7,200
620-5-5072-202 - $7,200
The remaining $51,600 will be funded through the Harvest Development Community Facilities District (CFD). The CFD administrators will request budget estimates for future fiscal years and incorporate those costs into the assessment fees. Currently the fund has available monies to cover this budget year's expense.
504-5-6002-202 - $51,600
OPTIONS:

As an alternative to Staff's recommendation, the City Council has the following options:

1. Decline to approve the Amendment. If Council chooses not to authorize the Amendment, staff will need to solicit bids for all landscaping services for the Harvest Development as a separate project. This will delay the City's current obligation to provide landscape maintenance services to current parkways and medians as they are accepted by and turned over to the city.

2. Provide alternate direction to staff, such as reducing the up to contract amount and term length.

ATTACHMENTS:
62 EXHIBIT A - Natural Green Landscape Inc Amendment No. 1.pdf EXHIBIT B - Landscape RFB Results.pdf
63 EXHIBIT A
Natural Green Landscape, Inc.

Amendment No. 1
64 65
66 67
Natural Green Landscape, Inc.  P. (805) 824-0564  F. (805) 804-3924  WWW.NTLGREEN.COM 1 Natural Green Landscape
5661 Perkins Road Natural Green Landscape Oxnard, CA 93033 Landscape & Construction
City of Santa Paula Public Works January 10, 2023
866 E Main St. Estimate: SP008
Santa Paula, CA 93060
ATTN: Gregory Barnes

Project: 2023 Landscape Maintenance
Located at: City of Santa Paula
The following is a price breakdown per area for the 2022 landscape maintenance for the City of Santa Paula as follows:

Site No. Location Monthly
Total per
Site
Monthly
Visit

1. Santa Paula St. & Cameron
St.
$100.00 Bi-Weekly

2. Cherry Hill to SP Limits $100.00 Bi-Weekly

3. Ojai Rd. & Amber Ln (WS
Planter)
$250.00 Bi-Weekly

4. Peck Rd. & Telegraph NW
Corner Planter
$150.00 Bi-Weekly

5. Peck Rd. at Harvard Blvd.
(SE Planter)
$400.00 Bi-Weekly

6. Peck Rd. Parkways/Santa
Paula St. to Foothill Rd. (East
side Planter)
$150.00 Monthly

7. Peck Rd. East side of Harvard
to Faulkner Rd. (Planter Area)
$100.00 Monthly

8. Saticoy St. at Ojai Rd.
(Planter)
$100.00 Bi-Weekly

9. Parkway planters at Telegraph
& Country View Court
$200.00 Monthly

10. Downtown Main St. (7th St.

East to 8th St. East to 12th St.
$500.00 Weekly
68 2
Natural Green Landscape
Landscape & Construction
Natural Green Landscape
5661 Perkins Road
Oxnard, CA 93033

11. Hillsborough Manor Ridge
Hillside, East end of Loma
Vista-Manor Ridge Hillside
$400.00 Bi-Weekly

12. Well No. 12 at Lemonwood
Dr.
$150.00 Bi-Weekly

13. Well No. 13 at Cemetery Rd. $150.00 Bi-Weekly

14. City Reservoir at 10th St. $100.00 Weekly

15. Peck Rd. Ditch $200.00 Monthly

16. Park St. Easement Mill Park
and Park St.
$100.00 Monthly

17. Santa Clara and 12th St. South $100.00 Monthly

18. Main St. at Harvard Blvd.

West/East side of Bridge
$100.00 Bi-Weekly

19. 10th St. Ventura St. to Main
St. (East Side Parkway)
$100.00 Weekly

20. Santa Ana & Palm Ave.

Southwest Planter along Palm
Ave.
$100.00 Bi-Weekly

21. West side of Palm Ave, From
Ventura St. to Main St.
$100.00 Bi-Weekly

22. Green St. Alley and Parking
Lot
$250.00 Bi-Weekly

23. Santa Paula Water Recycling
Facility 920 Cal Pipe Rd.
$600.00 Bi-Weekly

24. Forest Drive Planter $200.00 Bi-Weekly

25. East Area 1 – Corner of
Hallock & Telegraph up to
Limonera Rd
$750.00 Weekly

26. Monthly Grand Total $5,450.00
69 Natural Green Landscape, Inc.  P. (805) 824-0564  F. (805) 804-3924  WWW.NTLGREEN.COM 3 Natural Green Landscape
5661 Perkins Road Natural Green Landscape Oxnard, CA 93033 Landscape & Construction
Sincerely,
Anthony Zaragoza
Natural Green Landscape Inc,
License # 1027584
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are herby accepted.

ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
_________________________________________________________________________ Print Name and Title of Authorized Representative
______________________________________________ ____________________ Authorized signature Date
70 EXHIBIT B
City-Wide Landscape
RFB Results
71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 96
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: James Mason, Community & Economic Development Director Subject: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO.1320 AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 16.58.010 REGARDING REGULATION OF BUSINESS

SIGNAGE FOR ESTABLISHMENTS OFFERING THE SALE OF

ALCOHOL
Date: January 18, 2023
Agenda Item: 10.E

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO.1320 AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 16.58.010

REGARDING REGULATION OF BUSINESS SIGNAGE FOR ESTABLISHMENTS

OFFERING THE SALE OF ALCOHOL
Presented by: James Mason, Economic and Community Development Director BACKGROUND:

At the December 21, 2022 regular meeting, the City Council introduced and waived the first reading of Ordinance No. 1320 Amending Municipal Code Section 16.58.010 Regarding Regulation of Business Signage for Establishments Offering the Sale of Alcohol. The Ordinance is now presented to the City Council for adoption.

ANALYSIS:

If adopted by the City Council, this Ordinance would amend the municipal code to allow signage representing a business name to include reference to alcohol but maintain restrictions on signs advertising alcoholic products by name.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

The proposed ordinance supports the Operational Excellence strategic plan goal by reviewing and updating the development code to reduce or eliminate irrelevant information while providing updates.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

The amendment to the ordinance could improve business attraction and as a result increase 97 revenues from project applications and new business sales tax.

OPTIONS:

As an alternative to Staff's recommendation, the City Council may:

1. Decline to approve Staff's recommendation. However, this may result in discouraging alcohol-selling businesses from coming to the City if they cannot reference an alcoholic beverage in their business name signage.

ATTACHMENTS:

ATTACHMENT A - Ordinance No. 1320
EXHIBIT A AMENDED SSPMC Chapter16.58.010 Alcohol Sign Restrictions-c1.docx 98 ATTACHMENT A

CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 1320 & EXHIBIT A:

DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
99 ORDINANCE NO. 1320

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 16.58.010 (DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS AND USE CONDITIONS) OF CHAPTER 16.58 (ALCOHOLIC

BEVERAGE SALES) OF THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING

TO RESTRICTIONS ON BUSINESS SIGNS ADVERTISING ALCOHOLIC

BEVERAGES
The City Council of the City of Santa Paula does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

A. Santa Paula Municipal Code (“SPMC”) § 16.58.010 (G), prohibits signs advertising any kind of alcoholic beverage, including beer, which will be easily visible from the exterior of the business. The proposed Development Code (“Code”) amendment would allow signage representing a business name to include references to alcohol but maintain restrictions on the advertisement of specific alcoholic beverages by name.

B. The proposed amendment was reviewed by the City’s Planning Division for, in part, consistency with the General Plan and conformity with the Santa Paula Municipal Code.

C. The City Planning Division reviewed the proposed amendments’ environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”), the regulations promulgated there under (14 Cal.

Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”), and the City’s Environmental Guidelines (“Santa Paula Guidelines”; CEQA, CEQA Guidelines and Santa Paula Guidelines collectively referred to as “CEQA Regulations”); D. On December 6, 2022, the Planning Commission opened a public hearing to receive and consider public testimony and other evidence regarding the proposed amendment and whether to approve Resolution No. 3844 to recommend the proposed amendment to the City Council for adoption by ordinance.

E. The Commission approved Resolution No. 3844, and its findings, based upon the evidence presented to the Commission at its December 6, 2022 hearing including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by the Planning Division.

F. A public hearing for City Council consideration of the proposed amendment was set for December 21, 2022, notice of which was given pursuant to SPMC §

16.208.040(A).
100
G. On December 21, 2022, the City Council opened a public hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the proposed amendment.

H. The City council considered the information provided by City staff and public testimony. This Ordinance, and its findings, are made based upon such evidence presented to the City Council at its December 21, 2022 hearing including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by the Planning Division.

SECTION 2: Factual Findings and Conclusions. Pursuant to SPMC Title 16, Development Code, the City Council finds that:

A. Amending SPMC § 16.58 to allow signs representing a business name to include reference to alcohol but maintain restrictions on the advertisement of alcoholic beverages by name is consistent with the character and intent of uses within the City.

B. The proposed amendment to the Code is not expected to have a negative impact on existing businesses nor the surrounding properties. All permanent signs require approval and permits from the City.

C. The proposed amendment to the Code is desirable to encourage services and facilities which will contribute to the general convenience or welfare of the community because allowing signage representing a business name to include reference to alcohol but maintain restrictions on advertisement for specific alcoholic products by name may enhance services that are sought and enjoyed by a large segment of the community. The proposed amendment is also compatible with the existing, surrounding and planned land uses within the City.

D. The characteristics of the proposed amendment are not unreasonable or incompatible with the types of signs permitted within the City. All permanent signs will continue to require approval and permits from the City.

SECTION 3: General Plan and Development Objectives. Pursuant to SPMC §

16.208.030(C), the City Council has reviewed the Planning Commission’s recommendation, and finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of Title 16 of the SPMC, the General Plan, and development policies of the City as follows:

A. The Santa Paula General Plan (2040) land use designation of the area impacted by the proposed amendment include all zones where the sale of alcoholic beverages is permitted.

B. The purpose of Chapter 16.208, Development Code Amendments, is to allow for amendment to the Code in recognition of the fact that physical, economic, and other conditions in the city may change over time. Currently, Section (G) of SPMC §

16.58.010, Development Standards and Use Conditions, prohibits signs advertising any kind of alcoholic beverage, including beer, which will be easily visible from the 101
exterior of the business. The proposed amendment would allow signage representing a business name to include reference to alcohol but maintain restrictions on advertisement for specific alcoholic beverages by name. The proposed amendment is consistent with Title 16 of the SPMC because it accommodates the changing economic conditions of the City.

C. The proposed code amendment is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs of the Santa Paula General Plan (2040), as further described below in Section 4, particularly the following:
 Land Use Element, Community Character and Urban Form: LU1  Land Use Element, Balanced Land Use & Economic Opportunity: LU3  Economic Development and Downtown, Support Existing Businesses: EDD1.1 SECTION 4: Development Code Amendments. Pursuant to SPMC §16.208.050, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for consideration by the City Council:

A. The proposed code amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. Consistent with Land Use Policy LU 1 (Community Character and Urban Form), the proposed amendment will enhance the smalltown character of the City by allowing signage representing a business name to include reference to alcohol but maintaining restrictions on advertisement for specific alcoholic beverages by name. The proposed amendment is also consistent with Land Use Policy LU 3 (Balanced Land Use & Economic Opportunity), as it will allow for flexibility in business names and remove disincentives for new businesses that wish to erect signs with their registered business names despite containing references to alcohol. In addition, the amendment is consistent with Economic Development and Downtown Policy EDD

1.1 (Support Existing Businesses) because allowing flexibility in business names associated with the sale of alcohol may attract patrons to surrounding businesses.

Nothing in the proposed amendment would create an inconsistency with the goals, policies and objectives of the 2040 General Plan.

B. The proposed code amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties.

The proposed amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties because the proposed amendment is allowing a business name sign to include reference to alcohol but maintain restrictions on advertisement for specific alcoholic products by name. All businesses selling alcoholic beverages must still obtain a Conditional Use Permit as required by the Code to avoid adverse effects on nearby properties.

C. The proposed code amendment promote public health, safety, and general welfare and serves the goals and purposes of Title 16. The public health, safety, and general welfare will be promoted by allowing greater flexibility for business names who would like to include reference to alcohol. In addition, the amendment is 102
intended to manage the increasing interest from existing and prospective businesses to include reference to alcohol in their business name. For the reasons described in paragraphs B. and C. of Section 3, the proposed amendment will serve the goals and purposes of Title 16 of the SPMC.

SECTION 5: Environmental Assessment. State CEQA Guidelines sections 15378(b)(2) and 15378(b)(5) provide that ongoing administrative activities and organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a “project” as defined by the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.). And even if the proposed text amendment was a “project” it is exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines section 15601(b)(3)’s “common sense” rule that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Here, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment to allow signage representing a business name to include reference to alcohol but maintain restrictions on advertisement for specific alcoholic beverages by name will have a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 6: Subsection (G) of Section 16.58.010, Development Standards and Use Conditions, of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (underlined text denotes additional text; stricken text denotes deletions):
(G) No signs advertising any kind of alcoholic beverage product, including beer, which will be easily visible from the exterior of the business will be permitted. This prohibition does not apply to business signage representing a registered company name.

SECTION 7. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, the provisions hereof shall supersede any inconsistent or conflicting provisions of the Santa Paula Municipal Code.

SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify as to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published within fifteen (15) days of the adoption and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.

SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE
103
104
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of January 2023.
________________________________
Andy Sobel, Mayor
ATTEST:

Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Monica Castillo, Interim City Attorney
105

EXHIBIT A

SANTA PAULA MUNICPAL CODE AMENDED

REFERENCES TO SIGNAGE AND ALCOHOL ADVERTISEMENT
106
CHAPTER 16.58: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES
§ 16.58.010 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND USE CONDITIONS.

Any use providing alcohol beverage sales for either on-site or off-site consumption is subject to the following standards and conditions on use:
(A) All new sales of alcohol, with the exception of temporary sales as specified in § 16.58.030 of this chapter, must obtain a Conditional Use Permit. (B) A new alcohol sales use may only be established in a location such that the proposed use will not contribute to undue concentration of such uses in an area where additional such uses would be undesirable, with consideration to be given to the area's function and character, problems of crime and loitering, traffic problems and capacity. (C) Except for temporary sales of alcohol citywide and except for alcohol sales for on-site consumption within the Central Business District, sale of alcoholic beverages within 300 feet of a public or private school is prohibited on weekdays between the hours or 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
(D) The proposed use must not adversely affect adjacent or nearby properties. (E) Adequate litter receptacles must be provided.
(F) Where the proposed use is near residential uses, it must be limited in hours of operation, or designed and operated, so as to avoid disruption of residents' sleep between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
(G) No signs advertising any kind of alcoholic product, which will be easily visible from the exterior of the business will be permitted. This prohibition does not apply to business signage representing a registered company name. (H) Windows must be kept free of signs and other obstructions to allow visual inspection from the outside.
(I) The property owner/operator/applicant and the city must enter into an enforcement agreement to facilitate the control of the sale of alcohol, inclusive of spirits, distilled liquor, beer and wine at this site before selling alcohol on the subject property.

This agreement will be subject to review and approval of the City Council. The agreement must also obligate any heirs, assigns, and other future owners/operators of the establishment, or must be replaced by a new similar agreement. (J) No provision in this section is intended to conflict with the authority of the State of California Bureau of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) to issue alcohol sales licenses.

Before commencing the proposed use, applicants seeking a Conditional Use Permit for new alcohol sales are required to obtain the appropriate license from ABC in accordance with state law.
(Ord. 1100,
107
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: James Mason, Community & Economic Development Director Subject: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1321 RELATING TO AN

EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC

VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS
Date: January 18, 2023
Agenda Item: 10.F

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No.1321 relating to an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations.

BACKGROUND:

At the City Council regular meeting of December 21, 2022, the City Council introduced and waived the first reading of Ordinance No.1321, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 16.77 TO

TITLE XVI OF THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO AN EXPEDITED,

STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS.

The Ordinance is now presented to the City Council for adoption.

ANALYSIS:

If adopted by the City Council, this Ordinance would streamline and expedite current departmental procedures by enacting the State's clear approval deadlines and requiring the creation and use of an approval checklist for electric vehicle charging station applications.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Facilitating growth of electric vehicle charging stations directly aligns with Objective No. 5 of Section C: Infrastructure, Transportation & Mobility in the adopted 2021-2023 City of Santa Paula Strategic Plan.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

The codification of the state's requirements into our code will have no fiscal impact as it is staff's existing process.
108
OPTIONS:

As an alternative to Staff's recommendation, the City Council may:

1. Decline to approve Staff's recommendation and direct staff to make further edits to the proposed Ordinance. Doing so, however, will delay compliance with state mandates.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment_A_-_Draft_Ordinance_No._1321__BBK_Revisions-c1_tt_FINAL_ (1)revisedc1.docx ATTACHMENT B, 2023 EVCS Charging Checklist.pdf
109

ATTACHMENT A
ORDINANCE NO. 1321
AMENDING SPMC CHAPTER 16.77
110
ORDINANCE NO. 1321

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA PAULA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 16.77 TO TITLE

XVI OF THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO AN

EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC

VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS
The City Council of the City of Santa Paula does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds and declares
A. The State of California has adopted Assembly Bill 1236 (Chapter 598, Statutes of 2015), which requires every city with a population of less than 200,000 residents to adopt an ordinance that creates an expedited and streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations on or before September 30, 2017.

B. AB 970 (Chapter 710, Statutes of 2021), requires, beginning January 1, 2023, such permitting applications, to be deemed complete, and subsequently deemed approved, at a certain point after submission if the City of Santa Paula (“City’) has not taken certain specified actions with respect to the applications.

C. Creation of an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations would facilitate convenient charging of electric vehicles and help reduce the City’s reliance on fossil fuels.

D. On December 6, 2022, the City of Santa Paula Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3841 recommending the City Council consider amending Chapter

16.77 as described herein.

E. The City wishes to amend the Santa Paula Municipal Code to meet these State law requirements and to facilitate convenient charging of electric vehicles.

SECTION 2. Chapter 16.77 of Title XVI of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (where underlined text indicates additions):
“Chapter 16.77 ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SYSTEMS; STREAMLINED

PERMITTING
Section

16.77.010 Purpose

16.77.020 Definitions

16.77.030 Electrical Vehicle Charging Station Requirements

16.77.040 Expedited Permitting Process

16.77.050 Permit Application Process

16.77.060 Permit Review; Timing
111

16.77.010 Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to create an expedited and streamlined electric vehicle charging station permitting process that complies with Government Code sections 65850.7 and 65850.71 to achieve the timely and cost-effective installation of electric vehicle charging stations. Pursuant to Government Code section 65850.7 and notwithstanding any other provision of this code pertaining to conditional or accessory uses, only an electrical permit shall be required for an electric vehicle charging station.

16.77.020 Definitions
Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following definitions govern the construction and phrases used in this chapter.

A FEASIBLE METHOD TO SATISFACTORILY MITIGATE OR AVOID THE SPECIFIC, ADVERSE IMPACT includes, but is not limited to, any cost-effective method, condition, or mitigation imposed by the City on another similarly situated application in a prior successful application for a permit.

BUILDING OFFICIAL means the chief building official of the City or his or her designee.

ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION or CHARGING STATION means any level of electric vehicle supply equipment station that is designed and built in compliance with Article 625 of the California Electrical Code, and any subsequent amendments thereto, and delivers electricity from a source outside an electric vehicle into a plug-in electric vehicle.

ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL means the utilization of one or more of the following:
(1) Email
(2) The Internet; or
(3) Facsimile
SPECIFIC ADVERSE IMPACT means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, and written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.

16.77.030 Electrical Vehicle Charging Station Requirements (A) The electric vehicle charging station shall meet the applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Society of Automotive Engineers, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories, and rules of the Public Utilities Commission and the local electric utility company regarding safety and reliability. 112
(B) Installation of electric vehicle charging stations and associated wiring, bonding, disconnecting means and overcurrent protective devices shall meet the requirements of Article 625 and all applicable provisions of the California Electrical Code. (C) Installation of electric vehicle charging stations shall be incorporated into the load calculations of all new or existing electrical services and shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code. Electric vehicle charging equipment shall be considered a continuous load.
(D) Anchorage of either floor-mounted or wall-mounted electric vehicle charging stations shall meet the requirements of the California Building or Residential Code as applicable per occupancy, and the provisions of the manufacturer’s installation instructions. Mounting of charging stations shall not adversely affect building elements.

16.77.040 Expedited Permitting Process
Consistent with Government Code section 65850.7, the Building Official shall implement an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations and adopt a checklist of all requirements with which electric vehicle charging stations shall comply with in order to be eligible for expedited review. The expedited, streamlined permitting process and checklist may refer to the recommendations contained in the most current version of the “Plug-In Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Permitting Checklist” of the “Zero-Emission Vehicles in California: Community Readiness Guidebook” as published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. The City’s adopted checklist shall be published on the City’s website.

16.77.050 Permit Application Process
(A) Prior to submitting an application for processing, the applicant shall verify that the installation of an electric vehicle charging station will not have specific, adverse impact to public health and safety and building occupants. Verification by the applicant includes but is not limited to: electrical system capacity and loads; electrical system wiring, bonding and overcurrent protection; building infrastructure affected by charging station equipment and associated conduits; and areas of charging station equipment and vehicle parking.
(B) A permit application that satisfies the information requirements in the City’s adopted checklist shall be deemed complete and be promptly processed. A completed application does not authorize an applicant to energize or utilize the electric vehicle charging station until approval and all necessary permits are granted by the City. (C) If the Building Official determines that the permit application is incomplete, he or she shall issue a written correction notice to the applicant, detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance.
113
(D) The Building Official shall allow for electronic submittal of permit applications covered by this chapter and associated supporting documentations. In accepting such permit applications, the Building Official shall also accept electronic signatures on all forms, applications, and other documentation in lieu of a wet signature by any applicant.

16.77.060 Permit Review
(A) The Building Official shall review all electric vehicle charging station applications. Notwithstanding the expedited permit processing set forth in this chapter, the Building Official retains authority at all times to identify and address higher priority lifesafety situations. (B) If the Building Official makes a finding based on substantial evidence that the electric vehicle charging station could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety, the City may require the applicant to apply for a conditional use permit.

The Building Official’s decision may be appealed by the applicant to the Planning Commission.
(C) An application for a conditional use permit to install an electric vehicle charging station shall not be denied unless the Planning Commission makes written findings based upon substantial evidence in the record that the proposed installation would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. The findings shall include the basis for the rejection of potential feasible alternatives. If denied, the Planning Commission’s decision may be appealed by the applicant to the City Council pursuant to Chapter 16.110.210.
(D) In the technical review of a charging station application, the Building Official shall not condition the approval of any electric vehicle charging station permit on the approval of such a system by an association, as that term is defined by Civil Code Section 4080.
(E) Upon confirmation by the Building Official that the permit application and supporting documents meet the requirements of the City adopted checklist, and is consistent with all applicable laws and health and safety standards, the Building Official shall, consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, as may be amended, approve the application and issue all necessary permits.
(F) An application to install an electric vehicle charging station submitted to the building official of the City shall be deemed complete if, after the applicable time period has elapsed, both of the following are true:
(1) The Building Official has not deemed the application complete, consistent with the checklist created by the City pursuant to Government Code section 65850.7(g).
114
(2) The Building Official has not issued a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and identifying any additional information explicitly necessary for the Building Official to complete a review limited to whether the electric vehicle charging station meets all health and safety requirements of local, state, and federal law, consistent with subdivisions (b) and (g) of Government Code section 65850.7.
(G) For purposes of paragraph (F), “applicable time period” means either of the following:
(1) Five business days after submission of the application to the City if the application is for at least 1, but not more than 25 electric vehicle charging stations at a single site.
(2) Ten business days after submission of the application to the City if the application is for more than 25 electric vehicle charging stations at a single site. (H) An application to install an electric vehicle charging station shall be deemed approved if the applicable time period described in paragraph (G) has elapsed and all of the following are true:
(1) The Building Official has not administratively approved the application pursuant to Government Code section 65850.7(b). (2) The Building Official has not made a finding, based on substantial evidence, that the electric vehicle charging station could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety or required the applicant to apply for a use permit pursuant to Government Code section 65850.7(b).
(3) The building official of the City has not denied the use permit pursuant to Government Code section 65850.7(c).
(4) An appeal has not been made to the Planning Commission pursuant to Government Code section 65850.7(d).
(I) For purposes of paragraph (H), “applicable time period means” either of the following:
(1) Twenty business days after the application was deemed complete, if the application is for at least 1, but not more than 25 electric vehicle charging stations at a single site.
(2) Forty business days after the application was deemed complete, if the application is for more than 25 electric vehicle charging stations at a single site. (J) If an electric vehicle charging station and any associated equipment interfere with, reduce, eliminate, or in any way impact the required parking spaces for existing uses, the City shall reduce the number of required parking spaces for existing 115
uses by the amount necessary to accommodate the electric vehicle charging station and any associated equipment.”
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

SECTION 4. California Environmental Quality Act. This Ordinance was assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines (Guidelines), and the environmental regulations of the City. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance is not subject to CEQA because the adoption of this ordinance is not a "project" pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Specifically, this Ordinance only establishes a streamlined process for electric vehicle charging station permits and merely authorizes administrative activities which will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Moreover, under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that the provisions contained herein would not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. Certification and Publication. The City Clerk of the City of Santa Paula shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause of publication to occur in a newspaper of general circulation and published and circulated in the City in a manner permitted under California Government Code Section 36933.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Paula, California on the ___ day of ________________, 2023.

Andy Sobel, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Julie Latshaw, City Clerk Monica Castillo, Interim City Attorney 116
State of California )
County of Ventura ) s.s.

City of Santa Paula )
I, Julie Latshaw, City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 1321, introduced at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of December 2022, and duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Paula, California at a regular meeting thereof held the ___day of ______________, 2023.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City this __ day of _________, 2023.
______________________________

JULIE LATSHAW, CITY CLERK
117
City of Santa Paula
200 South Tenth St
Santa Paula, CA 93060
(805) 933-4218
Electric Vehicle Charging
Station Checklist
Residential and Non-residential Permitting Checklist for Electric Vehicles and Electric Vehicle Service Equipment
Please complete the following information related to permitting and installation of Electric Vehicle Service Equipment (EVSE) as a supplement to the application for a building permit. This checklist contains the technical aspects of EVSE installations and is intended to help expedite permitting and use for electric vehicle charging.

Upon this checklist being deemed complete, a permit shall be issued to the applicant. However, if it is determined that the installation might have a specific adverse impact on public health or safety, additional verification will be required before a permit can be issued.

This checklist substantially follows the “Plug-In Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Permitting Checklist” contained in the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research “Zero Emission Vehicles in California: Community Readiness Guidebook” and is purposed to augment the guidebook’s checklist.

Project Address: Permit No.:

Applicant Name: Applicant Phone Number?
Applicant email:

Contractor Name: Contractor Phone Number?
Applicant email:

Owner Name: Owner Phone Number?
Owner email:

Single Family Residential Multi-family Residential (Apt) Multi-family Residential (Condominium) Non-Residential (Single Business) Non-Residential (Multi-Business) Mixed-Use Public Right-of-Way
Location and Number of EVSE to be installed.

SFD Garage Parking Structure Parking lot Street Curb
Scope of work?
118
EVSE Charging Level:

Level 1 (120v) Level 2 (240v) Level 3 (480v)
Manufacturer of EVSE:

Mounting: Wall Mount Pole/pedestal Other:

Maximum Rating (Nameplate) of EV Service Equipment: kW Voltage: V System Voltage: 240/120v, Single Ph. 3-wire 208Y/120v, 3 ph., 4wire 480Y/277v EVSE Circuit Rating: Amp/ Poles
EVSE Circuit Breaker AIC Rating (if not single family, 400A = A.I.C. or Verify with Inspector Existing Service Panel:

Specify either connected, calculated or documented demand load of existing panel:

Connected load of existing panel supplying EVSE = Amps
Calculated load of existing panel supplying EVSE = Amps Demand load of existing panel or service supplying EVSE = Amps (Provide demand load reading from utility)
Total Load (Existing plus EVSE Load) = Amps
For single family dwellings, if the existing load is not known by any of the above methods, then the calculated loads may be estimated using the “Single Family Residential Permitting Application Example” in the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research “Zero Emission Vehicles in California: Community Readiness Guidebook” EVSE Rating: Amps x 1.25 = Amps/kcmil. Minimum EVSE conductor ampacity? = AWG/kcmil For single family: Existing service conductors: AWG/kcmil or feeders AWG/kcmil Feeder circuit supplying EVSE Panel: AWG/kcmil.

I hereby acknowledge that the information presented is a true and correct representation of existing conditions at the job site and that any causes for concern as to life-safety verifications may require further substantiation of information.

Signature of Permit Applicant: Date:
119
EXISTING 200A

MAIN SERVICE
PANEL

PROPOSED

EVSE/NEMA PLUG

PROPOSED EVSE

CONDUCTOR AND
¾” EMT CONDUIT
EXISTING 2 CAR GARAGE

SAMPLE RESIDENTIAL GARAGE PLAN
120
Non-Residential EVSE Charging Stations
NO

PARKING
EV

CHARGING
ONLY
EV

CHARGING
ONLY

ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
30” X 48 CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE

EV CHARGER
20’-0”
SPMC 16.46.100 Table 46-2
12’-0” MIN 60” MIN 9’-0” MIN

VAN ACCESSIBLE
EVCS

1. Where 4 or fewer total EVCS are provided, identification with an international symbol of accessibility and signs identifying van accessible spaces shall not be required. CBC 11B-812.8.1

2. Where 5 to 25 EVCS spaces are provided, one van accessible EVCS shall be identified with an international symbol of accessibility. The required standard EVCS shall not be required to be identified with an international symbol of accessibility. CBC 11B-812.8.2

3. Where 26 or more EVCS spaces are provided, all required van accessible and all required standard accessible EVCS shall be identified with an international symbol of accessibility. CBC 11B-812.8.3

4. Access aisles and diagonal hatching shall be a maximum of 36 inches on center. The blue color required for identification of access aisles shall not be used. CBC 11B-812.7.1 to 11B-812.7.3

5. The words “NO PARKING” and “EV CHARGING ONLY” shall be 12 inch high letters minimum. CBC 11B812.7.3 and 11B-812.9 121
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Donald Aguilar, Interim Police Chief
Subject: APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MIKE ARANDA FOR POLICE

DEPARTMENT PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Date: January 18, 2023
Agenda Item: 10.G

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
(1) Approve the First Amended and Restated Professional Services Agreement with Mike Aranda for Police Department Project Management Services Presented by: Interim Police Chief Don Aguilar
BACKGROUND:

On November 10,2022, Mr. Mike Aranda entered into a 60-day Professional Services Agreement ("PSA") as an independent contractor to perform project management functions for the Santa Paula Police Department (the "Department"). The PSA provided for compensation not to exceed $15,000 and expired on January 13, 2023. During the 60-day period, Mr.

Aranda began oversight on several projects and multiple audits including the following:

1. Security fencing enclosing the police/city hall parking lot. Construction of fencing around the police station/city hall parking lot is currently moving forward with contractors.

2. Records Management System (RMS) / Mark43 Computer Assisted Dispatch (CAD) Merger Project. Consultant has begun to oversee the upgrading of existing CAD capabilities to include a robust RMS component to provide real-time information and support officer safety. The new RMS/CAD system will begin roll-out this month.

3. California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Mandated Training Compliance Audit. Consultant has completed this audit and submitted recommendations for a training management software for purchase to close gaps for any officers or dispatchers who were out of mandated compliance. The software has been purchased and ensures an ongoing assessment and milestone timeline to complete training throughout this year and future years to come. 122

4. Personnel Training. Consultant has used his subject matter expertise to train sworn and civilian staff in areas of the daily functioning of the Police Department including Fleet Services, Professional Standards, Facility Maintenance, Property Room accountability, Animal Control enforcement, Public Records Act, employee timesheet reporting, and department cell phone use.

The Department presently lacks the capacity to complete much-needed work. It is staff's opinion that it would be most cost-effective for Mr. Aranda to complete projects he has started and that further training would benefit Department personnel. Therefore, staff is requesting that the City Council approve the proposed First Amended and Restated PSA (Attachment A) to continue using Mr. Aranda's services.

ANALYSIS:

The First Amended and Restated PSA before you this evening extends the PSA's 60-day term for an additional 10 months (resulting in a new term end date of November 10, 2023), increases the maximum compensation to $69,600, clarifies various provisions, and expands the scope of services.

The scope of services has been expanded by adding projects or extending the time to complete existing ones as follows:

1. Department Facilities Improvement Projects (in progress). Consultant will oversee the limited demolition of existing walls, re-build of partition walls, revised main entrance of public lobby, reconfiguration of patrol briefing room, property room, detective office, interview rooms, and records bureau. These facility improvements are scheduled to be completed no later than November 10, 2023.

2. Records Management System (RMS) / Mark43 Computer Assisted Dispatch (CAD) Merger Project (in progress). As noted above, this project will begin roll-out this month and is scheduled to be completed no later than November 10, 2023.

3. 2023 Annual Police Department Audits. Consultant will conduct the annual audits of Department policies and processes. The audits will be done of the following areas, policies, and standards:

Property Room
Detective Caseload
Customer Service/Citizen Complaint
Timesheet/Overtime Variance Reporting
California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Mandated Training Compliance, including an action plan to obtain compliance before the next mandated audit in July 2023
Racial Identity Profile Act (RIPA) Reporting
123

4. Lexipol Policy Customization. Consultant will review and update all Lexipol policies for specific application to the Department. All recommended revisions to standard Lexipol policies shall be completed no later than November 10, 2023, or as may be required to comply with any new applicable legislation.

5. Personnel Training. Consultant shall provide training to sworn and non-sworn employees in areas in which deficiencies or noncompliance have been identified, including any existing practices that should be modified to comply with new laws. Areas in which employees will receive training are the City’s work cell phone use policy, Public Records Act knowledge, internal affairs investigations, fleet services ordering, and other areas for improvement identified in Consultant’s audits. Training and related work product is scheduled to be completed no later than November 10, 2023, or by any earlier applicable state-mandated deadline.

6. Police Department Centennial Wall/Display. Consultant shall manage the design and dedication of a wall in the main hallway of the Police Department to commemorate the Department’s 100-year history. This project is scheduled to be completed by the anniversary date of April 22, 2023.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Approval of this item moves the City closer to completing City Council's two-year Strategic Plan, Section E (Public Safety), Objective #6 because the Consultant's services will help to implement a phased plan for Police Department Facility Upgrades.

It also furthers Section E (Public Safety), Objective # 7, because the Consultant is overseeing the upgrading and implementation of a new CAD System.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

The contract increase from $15,000 to $69,600 will be funded from salary savings stemming from the vacant Commander position. Staff will process a budget adjustment at the City Manager approval level moving $54,600 from 100-5-4501-001 ($15,834) and 104-5-4501-001 ($38,766) to 100-5-4501-209 and 104-5-4501-209 respectively.

OPTIONS:

As an alternative to Staff's recommendation, the City Council may:

1. Decline to approve the First Amended and Restated PSA. Doing so, however, will halt for the foreseeable future critical Department projects already in progress.

2. Provide additional direction to staff.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A - First Amended and Restated PSA - M. Aranda 124
65283.00006\40933183.4
-1- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This First Amended and Restated Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 18th day of January, 2023, by and between the City of Santa Paula, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 970 Ventura Street, Santa Paula, CA 93060, County of Ventura, State of California ("City") and Mike Aranda, an individual ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."

2. RECITALS.

2.1 The Parties entered into that certain Professional Services Agreement (“Original Agreement”) with a term start date of November 10, 2022 and end date of January 13, 2023.

2.2 The Original Agreement requires the Consultant to manage a number of projects for the Santa Paula Police Department as stated therein in exchange for compensation not to exceed $15,000 at a rate of $60 per hour.

2.3 The Santa Paula Police Department lacks personnel needed to manage the projects.

2.4 As of December 31, 2022, City has paid Consultant $7,200 out of the $15,000 compensation cap.

2.5 The Parties now mutually desire to amend the Original Agreement by extending the 60-day term for an additional 10 months (resulting in a new term end date of November 10, 2023), increasing the maximum compensation to $69,600, revising the Scope of Services, and clarifying other terms.

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City the services that are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Services” or “Scope of Services”). All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence November 10, 2022 and end November 10, 2023 (“Term”), unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the Term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the Term of this Agreement if necessary to complete the Services. 125
65283.00006\40933183.4
-2- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

3.2 Compensation.

3.2.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed Sixty-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($69,600) without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable.

3.2.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly invoice which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The invoice shall describe the amount of Services provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the invoice.

City shall, within 30 days of receiving such invoice, review the invoice and pay all non-disputed and approved charges. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, the City shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth therein. Payment shall not constitute acceptance of any Services completed by Consultant. The making of final payment shall not constitute a waiver of any claims by the City for any reason whatsoever.

3.2.3 Expenses. Consultant shall be responsible for all expenses incurred while performing services under this Agreement. This includes automobile, truck, and other travel expenses; vehicle maintenance and repair costs; vehicle and other license fees and permits; insurance premiums; road, fuel, and other taxes; fines; radio, pager, or cell phone expenses; meals; and all salary, expenses, and other compensation paid to employees or contract personnel the Contractor hires to complete the work under this Agreement.

3.2.4 Fringe Benefits. Consultant understands that neither Consultant nor Consultant’s employees or contract personnel are eligible to participate in any employee retirement, health, vacation pay, sick pay, or other fringe benefit plan of City.

3.3 State and Federal Taxes.

3.3.1 Withholdings. City will not (a) withhold FICA (Social Security and Medicare taxes) from Consultant’s payments or make FICA payments on Consultant’s behalf; (b) make state or federal unemployment compensation contributions on Consultant’s behalf; or (c) withhold state or federal income taxes from Consultant’s payments.

3.3.2 Consultant Taxes. Consultant shall pay all taxes and, if Consultant is not a corporation, self-employment (Social Security) taxes. Upon City’s request, Consultant shall provide City with proof that such payments have been made.

3.4 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.4.1 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Neither City, or any of its officials, officers, directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and 126
65283.00006\40933183.4
-3- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. To the extent applicable, Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance and commercial general liability insurance for the entire term of this Agreement.

3.4.2 Mutual Representations and Agreements.

3.4.2.1 Consultant has the right to perform services for others during the term of this Agreement.

3.4.2.2 Consultant has the sole right to control and direct the means, manner, and method by which the Services required by this Agreement will be performed.

Provided Services are timely completed as set forth in Section 3.4.9 (Period of Performance), Consultant may select his starting and quitting times, days of work, and the order in which the Services are to be performed. Consultant has selected the days of work set forth in Exhibit “B” (Schedule of Services) attached to this Agreement.

3.4.2.3 Consultant shall not be required to wear any uniform provided by City, nor shall Consultant represent himself as an employee of the City.

3.4.2.4 Neither Consultant nor his employees shall receive training from the City in the professional skills necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement.

3.4.3 Vehicles and Equipment. Consultant shall furnish all vehicles, equipment, tools, and materials used to provide the Services required by this Agreement. City will not require Contractor to rent or purchase any equipment, product, or service as a condition of entering into this Agreement.

3.4.4 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services in a prompt and timely manner. Consultant represents that he has the skills required to perform the Services expeditiously.

3.4.5 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All final work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.4.6 City's Representative. The City hereby designates Donald Aguilar, or his designee, to act as its representative in all matters pertaining to the administration and performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for review and final approval of all products submitted by Consultant but not the authority to enlarge the Scope of Services or change the total compensation due to Consultant under this Agreement. The City Manager shall be authorized to act on City's behalf and to execute all necessary documents which enlarge the Scope of Services or change the Consultant's total compensation subject to the provisions contained in this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City Manager, City's Representative or his/her designee.

3.4.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.
127
65283.00006\40933183.4
-4- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

3.4.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that he is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services.

3.4.9 Period of Performance.

3.4.9.1 Consultant shall perform and complete all Services under this Agreement within the term set forth in Section 3.1.2 above (“Performance Time”). Consultant shall also perform the Services in strict accordance with any completion schedule, including that which may be separately agreed upon in writing by the City and Consultant (“Performance Milestones”).

Consultant agrees that if the Services are not completed within the aforementioned Performance Time and/or pursuant to any such Performance Milestones developed pursuant to provisions of this Agreement, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that the City will suffer damage.

3.4.10 Laws and Regulations; Background Check

3.4.10.1 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall keep himself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with the Services and this Agreement. All violations of such laws and regulations shall be grounds for the City to terminate the Agreement for cause.

3.4.10.2 Background Screening. Consultant agrees to submit to an inhouse background check and live scan fingerprinting.

3.4.10.3 Safety. Consultant shall perform the Services so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out the Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed.

3.5 Termination of Agreement.

3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those Services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause and by giving the City at least seven (7) days’ written notice. The rights and remedies of the City provided in this section shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law, equity or under this Agreement. “Cause” for the purposes of this section includes, without limitation, (i) a material violation of this Agreement, or (ii) any act exposing the other party to liability to others for personal injury or property damage.
128
65283.00006\40933183.4
-5- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within five (5) days of the request.

3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. An example of terminating this Agreement “in part” is an instance where the City gives Consultant seven (7) day’s written notice pursuant to this Section 3.5 that Consultant’s is not to perform a specific audit set forth in Exhibit “A”.

3.6 Indemnification.

3.6.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s Services or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses except such loss or damage caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

3.6.2 If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

3.7 General Provisions.

3.7.1 Independent Contractors and Subcontracting.

3.7.1.1 Use of Consultants. Consultant is aware of statutory and case law regarding classification of workers as independent contractors, including California Labor Code Section 2750.3 and Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018). To ensure that Consultant is in compliance with the California Labor Code, Consultant shall only utilize its employees, if any, to provide the Services. Consultant may not provide the services through any independent contractor, subcontractor or subconsultant (“Subcontractor(s)”) unless approved by the City as set forth in Section 2.6.1.2 below. Consultant represents and warrants that all personnel who perform the Services on Consultant’s behalf are Consultant’s employees, and that Consultant complies with all applicable laws, rules and regulations governing 129
65283.00006\40933183.4
-6- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
its employees, including, but not limited to, the California Labor Code, Unemployment Insurance Code and all applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders.

3.7.1.2 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not use any Subcontractor to provide the Services, or any portion of the work required by this Agreement, without prior written approval of City. In the event that City authorizes Consultant to use a Subcontractor, Consultant shall enter into a written agreement with the Subcontractor, which must include all provisions of the Agreement, including a restriction on the Subcontractor’s use of further independent contractors, subcontractors or subconsultants without the City’s prior written consent.

3.7.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Consultant: Mike Aranda
2511 Ruby Dr.

Oxnard, CA 93030
City: City of Santa Paula
970 Ventura Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
ATTN: City Manager
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.7.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

3.7.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). All Documents & Data shall be and remain the property of City, and shall not be used in whole or in substantial part by Consultant on other projects without the City’s express written permission. Within thirty (30) days following the completion, suspension, abandonment or termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City reproducible copies of all Documents & Data, in a form and amount required by City. City reserves the right to select the method of document reproduction and to establish where the reproduction will be accomplished. The reproduction expense shall be borne by City at the actual cost of duplication. In the event of a dispute regarding the amount of compensation to which the Consultant is entitled under the termination provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide all Documents & Data to City upon payment of the undisputed amount. Consultant shall have no right to retain or fail to provide to City any such documents pending resolution of the dispute.
130
65283.00006\40933183.4
-7- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

3.7.3.2 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by City of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted.

3.7.3.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs, or any publicity pertaining to the Services in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

3.7.3.4 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing Consultant’s proprietary information ("Proprietary Information") unless the City's legal counsel determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information.

Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the release notice to give City written notice of Consultant's objection to the City's release of Proprietary Information. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of an objection notice unless either: (1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City's choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and non-appealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.

3.7.4 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.7.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements.

3.7.6 Attorneys’ Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorneys’ fees and all costs of such action.

3.7.7 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Ventura County. In addition to any and all contract requirements 131
65283.00006\40933183.4
-8- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
pertaining to notices of and requests for compensation or payment for extra work, disputed work, claims and/or changed conditions, Consultant must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code sections 900 et seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the City. Such Government Code claims and any subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters that remain unresolved after all procedures pertaining to extra work, disputed work, claims, and/or changed conditions have been followed by Consultant. If no such Government Code claim is submitted, or if any prerequisite contractual requirements are not otherwise satisfied as specified herein, Consultant shall be barred from bringing and maintaining a valid lawsuit against the City.

3.7.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.7.9 City's Right to Employ Other Persons. City reserves right to employ other persons in connection with the Services.

3.7.10 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement.

3.7.11 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

3.7.12 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.7.13 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

3.7.14 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.7.15 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.7.16 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration 132
65283.00006\40933183.4
-9- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. To the extent applicable, Consultant further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subconsultants to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City’s Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.7.17 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. Each Party further warrants it was given the opportunity to have legal counsel review this Agreement before signing.

3.7.18 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.7.19 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the indemnification obligations, shall survive any such expiration or termination. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
133
65283.00006\40933183.4
-10- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

SIGNATURE PAGE TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA AND

MIKE ARANDA
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has caused this Contract to be executed on the day and year first above written.

CITY OF SANTA PAULA MIKE ARANDA, an individual
Approved By:

Dan Singer
City Manager
Approved as to Form:
_____________________________________
Monica Castillo
Interim City Attorney
Attested By:

Julie Latshaw
City Clerk
134
65283.00006\40933183.4
Exhibit “A”-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall be responsible for the following projects:
 Facilities Improvement Project. Consultant shall manage and oversee the following police department facility improvements: Limited demolition of existing walls, re-build of partition walls, revised main entrance of public lobby, reconfiguration of patrol briefing room, property room, detective office, interview rooms, and records bureau. These facility improvements shall be completed no later than November 10, 2023.  Records Management System (RMS) / Mark43 Computer Assisted Dispatch (CAD) Merger Project. Consultant shall manage and oversee the upgrade of existing CAD capabilities to include an RMS component to provide real-time information and support officer safety. Upgraded CAD software will be licensed from Mark43, Inc. The project shall be completed no later than November 10, 2023.
 2023 Annual Police Department Audits. Consultant shall conduct the annual audits of police department policies and processes. Audits will be done of the following areas, policies, and standards:
o Property Room
o Detective Caseload
o Customer Service/Citizen Complaint
o Timesheet/Overtime Variance Reporting
o California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Mandated Training Compliance, including an action plan to obtain compliance before the next mandated audit in July 2023
o Racial Identity Profile Act (RIPA) Reporting
All audits shall be completed no later than November 10, 2023, or by any earlier applicable state-mandated deadline.
 Lexipol Policy Customization. Consultant shall review and update all Lexipol policies for specific application to the police department. All recommended revisions to standard Lexipol policies shall be completed no later than November 10, or as may be required to comply with any new applicable legislation.
 Personnel Training. Consultant shall provide training to sworn and non-sworn employees in areas in which deficiencies or noncompliance have been identified, including any existing practices that should be modified to comply with new laws.

Consultant may determine the medium of training, including without limitation, verbal briefing, memorandum, and/or training bulletins. Areas in which employees will receive training are the City’s work cell phone use policy, Public Records Act knowledge, internal affairs investigations, fleet services ordering, and other areas for improvement identified in Consultant’s audits. Training and related work product shall be completed no later than November 10, 2023, or by any earlier applicable state-mandated deadline.  Police Department Centennial Wall. Consultant shall manage the design and dedication of a wall in the main hallway of the police department to commemorate the police 135
65283.00006\40933183.4
Exhibit “A”-2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
department’s 100-year history. This project shall be completed no later than April 22, 2023.
136
65283.00006\40933183.4
Exhibit “B”-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT "B"

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
Consultant has elected and agrees to perform the Services for a minimum of 8 hours and a maximum of 24 hours each week, but no more than an average of 20 hours per week for the Term of this Agreement. The parties will develop a method to ensure that Consultant does not work more than 20 hours per week on average over the term of this Agreement. Consultant has elected to work on the following days:

Monday, Tuesday, and Thursday.
137
65283.00006\40933183.4
Exhibit “C”-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT “C”

COMPENSATION
City shall compensate Consultant at a rate of $ 60.00 per hour. 138
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: James Mason, Community & Economic Development Director Subject: PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1326 ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING
STANDARDS CODE AND THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE CODE
Date: January 18, 2023
Agenda Item: 11.A

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
(1) Open the public hearing to receive testimonial and documentary evidence; (2) Close the public hearing;
(3) Adopt Ordinance No. 1326 adopting by reference the 2022 California Building Standards Code and the 2021 International Property
Maintenance Code;
(4) Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the adopted ordinance within fifteen days following adoption;
(5) Take such additional related action that may be desirable.

Presented by: James Mason, Community Development Director BACKGROUND:

At its December 21, 2022 regular meeting, the City Council introduced and waived first reading of Ordinance No. 1326 to adopt by reference the 2022 California Building Standards Code and the 2021 International Property Maintenance Code. Council thereafter scheduled this evening's public hearing on the proposed Ordinance, notice of which has been given according to law. After considering public testimony and closing the public hearing, Council may adopt the proposed Ordinance.

New editions of the California Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24) are published every three years in a triennial cycle with supplemental information published during other years. Publication of triennial editions of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) began in 1989. The most recent version of the code last adopted by the City was the 2019 edition published January 1, 2020. The California Health and Safety Code requires local governments to adopt the most current editions of the model codes related to construction. The new 2022 California Building Standards Code became effective January 1, 139
2022 and represents the minimum legal standards adopted by the State of California for construction. All jurisdictions are required to adopt the updated codes in order to maintain local consistency with state requirements. As a part of the code updates and revisions the City is also required to adopt the 2021 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC). The IPMC is a model code that regulates the minimum maintenance requirements for existing buildings.

It is a document intended to establish minimum maintenance standards for basic equipment, light, ventilation, heating, sanitation and fire safety.

These codes to be updated are as follows:

Part 1 Administration Code
Part 2 Volumes 1 and 2 Building Code
Part 3 Electrical Code
Part 4 Mechanical Code
Part 5 Plumbing Code
Part 6 Energy Code
Part 8 Historical Code
Part 9 Fire Code
Part 10 Existing Building Code
Part 11 Green Building Standards Code
Part 12 Referenced Standards Code
The 2021 International Property Maintenance Code
ANALYSIS:

The regulations in the 2022 California Building Standards Code are the standards for new construction and the 2021 International Property Maintenance Code are standards for code compliance applicable to existing buildings. Known as the Building Standards Codes, these codes are adopted by the State from the 2022 International Code Council’s model codes and they went into affect January 1, 2023. Adoption of the California Building Standards Codes is designed to provide consistency in the application and enforcement of building and housing standards. In order to adopt the latest California Building Standards Codes, the City must follow the procedure set forth in Section 50022.3 of the Government Code. After introduction of the Ordinance, a public hearing must be scheduled by the City Council. Notice of the public hearing must be published twice in a local newspaper at least 14 days before the public hearing. The Ordinance may then be adopted at the conclusion of the public hearing.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is not a goal or objective in the City Council's two-year Strategic Plan, however, it will enhance the public welfare because it will ensure buildings in Santa Paula are constructed and maintained according to minimum safety standards.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

There are no fiscal impacts.

OPTIONS:

As an alternative to Staff's recommendation, the City Council may:

Reject Staff’s recommendation. Doing so, however, would result in the city code being out of alignment with the 2022 California Code of Regulations Title 24 and the 2021 International Property Maintenance Code for the City of Santa Paula Building and Safety Division. This 140
would result in non-compliance with current building code development, health and safety standards set by state law.

ATTACHMENTS:

A_-
_ORDINANCE_NO_1326__2022_ADOPTION_OF_CALIFORNIA_CODE_OF_REGULATIONS_TITLE_24 c2-c1.docx
141

ATTACHMENT A
ORDINANCE NO. 1326 ADOPTING BY REFERENCE
THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
(CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24)
AND THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE CODE
142
ORDINANCE NO 1326

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA AMENDING SECTIONS 150.001, 150.015, 150.025, 150.045, 150.055, 150.075, 150.085, 150.150, 150.160, 150.170, 150.180, AND 150.190 OF CHAPTER 150 OF THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022

EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24), INCLUDING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; VOLUMES 1 AND 2 OF THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; THE 2022 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; AND THE 2021

INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
The City Council of the City of Santa Paula ordains as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

A. California Government Code Section 50022.1 et seq. authorizes the City of Santa Paula (“City”) to adopt by reference the California Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including certain uniform codes including the 2022 California Administrative Code, the 2022 California Building Code, the 2022 California Residential Code, the 2022 California Electrical Code, the 2022 California Mechanical Code, the 2022 California Plumbing Code, the 2022 California Energy Code, 2022 California Historical Building Code, the 2022 California Existing Building Code, the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code, and the 2022 California Referenced Standards Code, as well as the 2021 International Property Maintenance Code.

B. The City Council previously adopted the 2019 Edition of the California Building Standards Code as adopted by the State of California Building Standards Commission in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

C. The City now desires to adopt the provisions of the 2022 California Building Standards Code.

D. The City Council previously adopted the 2018 Edition of the International Property Maintenance Code as published by the International Code Council.

E. The City now desires to adopt the provisions of the 2021 International Property Maintenance Code.
143
F. The City held a public hearing on January 18th, 2023, at which time all interested persons had the opportunity to appear and be heard on the matter of adopting the California Building Standards Code as amended herein.

G. The City published notice of the aforementioned public hearing pursuant to California Government Code section 6066.

H. Any and all other legal prerequisites relating to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

SECTION 2: Section 150.001 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.001 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 1 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Administrative Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference."
SECTION 3: Section 150.015 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.015 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 2 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Building Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.” SECTION 4: Section 150.025 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.025 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 5 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Plumbing Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.” SECTION 5: Section 150.045 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.045 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. 144
Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 3 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Electrical Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.” SECTION 6: Section 150.055 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.055 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 4 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Mechanical Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.” SECTION 7: Section 150.075 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.075 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 2.5 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Residential Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.” SECTION 8: Section 150.085 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.085 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 11 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.”
SECTION 9: Section 150.150 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.150 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., that certain code known as the International Property Maintenance Code, 2021 Edition, published by the International Code Council, is hereby adopted by reference.” 145
SECTION 10: Section 150.160 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.160 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Energy Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.” SECTION 11: Section 150.170 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.170 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 12 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Referenced Standards Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.”
SECTION 12: Section 150.180 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.180 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 10 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Existing Building Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.”
SECTION 13: Section 150.190 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“§ 150.190 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 8 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 California Historical Building Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.”
SECTION 14: All references to the Administrative, Building, Residential, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Energy, Historical Building, Existing Building, Green Building 146
Standards, and Referenced Standards Codes, as well as the International Property Maintenance Code, and/or the Santa Paula Code by that name in the Santa Paula Municipal Code, any City forms, City documents, or City regulations shall be construed to refer to the Codes adopted herein and as amended hereinafter.

SECTION 15: One (1) complete copy of each of these Santa Paula Codes, including all of the codes adopted by reference, shall be maintained in the office of the Building Official and available for public review.

SECTION 16: In the event there are conflicts between the provisions of these codes and other codes or provisions adopted by the City, the most restrictive provision shall apply.

SECTION 17: Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances. All former ordinances or parts conflicting or inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance or of the codes are hereby repealed.

SECTION 18: Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase added by this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

SECTION 19: Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published at least five (5) days prior to the meeting at which the proposed ordinance is to be adopted and shall post a certified copy of the proposed ordinance in the office of the City Clerk, and with fifteen (15) days of its adoption, shall cause a summary of it to be published, including the vote for and against the same, and shall post a certified copy of the adopted ordinance in the office of the City Clerk, in accordance with California Government Code Section 36933.

SECTION 20: Effective Date. This ordinance and the rules, regulations, provisions, requirements, orders and matters established and adopted hereby shall take effect and be in full force and effect on February 17, 2023, which is to be no less than thirty (30) days from and after the date of its final passage and adoption.

SECTION 21: CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not a project within the meaning of Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment.

The terms of the building standards adopted herein are dictated by the California 147
Buildings Standards Code. The City Council further finds that the changes made to the Codes are enacted to mitigate the threats posed to public peace, health, and safety from earthquakes, high winds, and fire. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that adoption of this Ordinance will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Staff is directed to file a notice of exemption within five (5) days of the adoption of this Ordinance.

PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of January, 2023. _________________________
Andy Sobel, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
_________________________
Monica Castillo, Interim City Attorney
_________________________
Dan Singer, City Manager
148
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Jonathan Royas, Management Analyst
Subject: DISTRICTING – THIRD PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE INPUT AND

TESTIMONY REGARDING PROPOSED DRAFT DISTRICT MAPS

SUBMITTED, COMPOSITION OF COUNCIL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES,

AND COMMUNITIES OF INTEREST
Date: January 18, 2023
Agenda Item: 11.B

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Receive an updated presentation from staff, Dr. Justin Levitt of National Demographic Corporation (NDC), and Sydni Overly of Tripepi Smith regarding the process for developing options for City Council voting districts, to be implemented in November, 2024;

2. Consider, discuss, and provide direction or revisions to draft Council District Maps submitted;

3. Conduct a public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and

4. Receive and file public input on composition of Council District boundaries, communities of interest, and draft maps.

Presented by: Jonathan Royas, Management Analyst
Dr. Justin Levitt, NDC
Sydni Overly, Tripepi Smith
BACKGROUND:

On February 22, 2022, the City received a letter from attorney Jason Dominguez on behalf of "a large segment of the population and on behalf of Laura Espinosa" demanding an end to the at-large Council election system.

In response to that letter, on April 6, 2022, the City Council discussed its options and unanimously adopted Resolution No. 7393, indicating its intent to change the election system from at-large to by-district elections. Given the litigation risk and associated financial impact on the City, the City Council asked to enter into a settlement agreement with Mr. Dominguez and directed staff to move the districting process forward. The criteria to comply with all legal 149
requirements to establish council district boundaries is spelled out in California law and in the Council's adopted Resolution No. 7393. No settlement agreement could be reached with Mr.

Dominguez.

On May 4, 2022, Council provided staff direction to work with the City's existing public relations firm and to utilize our contract with BB&K law firm to select a qualified demographer.

Through that process, National Demographics Corporation (NDC), was selected.

As required by Elections Code Section 10010, the City will hold at least two (2) public hearings and a community workshop prior to the release of draft maps of Council election districts, followed by a community workshop and two additional Council hearings to solicit public input regarding the content of the draft maps and the proposed sequence of elections. Then an additional public hearing will be held prior to the approval of an ordinance that provides for district elections, approves the Council-selected map, and sets forth the steps to implement district elections.

On August 3, 2022, Council held its first public hearing whereby Dr. Daniel Phillips, from NDC, shared with Council and the public a presentation on the districting process to solicit input on the neighborhoods and communities of interest in the City.

On August 17, 2022, Council held its second public hearing whereby Council received an updated presentation from staff and NDC regarding the process for developing options for City Council voting districts; provided staff and NDC direction regarding any optional criteria Council wanted to consider in the development of voting district options; and conducted a public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries.

In addition, the City hosted three community workshops to educate and engage the community on the districting process and demonstrate how to use the map drawing tools provided by the consultant team. Below are the details of the three workshops.

September 14, 2022 @ 6:00PM (See Exhibit B for attendee brainstorm results) Santa Paula Cultural Arts Building @ The Santa Paula Community Center 530 W Main Street, Santa Paula, CA 93060
October 6, 2022 @ 6:00PM
Recorded Virtual Community Workshop via Zoom is available at www.drawsantapaula.org December 1, 2022 @ 6:00PM (See Exhibit B for attendee brainstorm results) Church of Guadalupe
427 N Oak Street, Santa Paula, CA 93060
The item before Council this evening is the third of four public hearings required by the FAIR MAPS Act.

ANALYSIS:

In accordance with the FAIR MAPS Act, the City Council has held two initial public hearings to inform the public about the districting process and to hear from the community on what factors should be taken into consideration when creating City Council district boundaries. This third public hearing is the first hearing to review and discuss draft maps of proposed districts that 150
have been submitted by members of the community. The fourth public hearing is scheduled for the City Council’s regular meeting of February 15, 2023, at which time the City Council is expected to identify and introduce an ordinance to adopt its preferred map.

Community Outreach
The City and consultant team of NDC and Tripepi Smith kicked off the districting process the week of June 3, 2022 with the website www.drawsantapaula.org going live and outreach coordination initiated. Additionally, the email [email protected] was also set up to begin receiving communications from the public in one central location. As a result, the City leveraged a full array of outreach platforms to connect with the public as discussed more fully in Exhibit A, District Formation Process Outreach Summary Report.

To date, the City has reached the community through the following:

Email and/or phone contact with nearly 120 community leaders, organizations, residents and media contacts to proactively outreach to key stakeholders with districting related information.

Rollout of the districting website, DrawSantaPaula.org, where extensive resources are available for the public to learn about the districting process, access all meeting materials and meeting information, draw maps based upon their understanding of communities of interest and submit them for consideration by City Council.

Distributed an online neighborhood survey to develop a list of neighborhoods and “communities of interest" – DrawSantaPaula.org/Neighborhood-Survey 30 social media posts in English and Spanish published across Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Nextdoor from July 1, 2022 – January 17, 2023.

Five flyers in English and Spanish to promote upcoming community meetings.

Four press releases in English and Spanish distributed to the City’s media contacts.

Four Channel 10 advertisements to promote upcoming community meetings.

Four community meetings to discuss the districting process and gather public input on neighborhoods and "communities of interest."
Publication of a mapping tool in English and Spanish in the Santa Paula Times to solicit draft maps.

Following the January 18, 2023 hearing, the City plans to conduct the following outreach activities:

Email outreach to nearly 120 community leaders, organizations, residents and media contacts to proactively outreach to key stakeholders with districting related information. 10-12 social media posts in English and Spanish published across Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Nextdoor from January 18, 2023 through March/April 2023.

An additional flyer in English and Spanish to promote final districting meetings.

An additional press release in English and Spanish distributed to the City’s media contacts.

An additional Channel 10 advertisement to promote final districting meetings.

An additional community meeting to gather public input on submitted maps.

It is important to note that all materials, social media posts, community workshops, and activities related to the districting process were conducted in both English and Spanish to maximize our public engagement.
151
Districting Rules and Goals
The community was encouraged to submit proposed maps for the January 18, 2023 public hearing for Council’s initial consideration and discussion, which included maps and feedback on "communities of interest." A "community of interest" is a neighborhood or group that would benefit from being in the same district because of shared interests, views, or characteristics.

Possible community features include, but are not limited to:

School attendance areas;
Natural dividing lines such as major roads, waterways, train tracks, hills, or highways; Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks;
Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/election concerns; and Shared demographic characteristics, such as:

Similar levels of income, education, or linguistic insolation; Languages spoken at home; and
Single-family and multi-family housing unit areas.

Additionally, the City must ensure compliance with the following state and federally-mandated criteria:

Federal
Each district shall contain a nearly equal population.

Each district shall be drawn in a manner that complies with the Federal Voting Rights Act.

Each district shall not be drawn with race as the predominant factor in violation of the principles established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), and its progeny.

State
Each district shall be contiguous.

Each district should avoid dividing neighborhoods and communities of interest.

Each district should be bordered by easily identifiable boundaries such as major roads or rivers. Each district should be compact.

Districts shall not be drawn to favor or disfavor a political party.

It should also be noted, in addition to the legal criteria, City Council may choose to adopt optional criteria to be used in the development of the districts. Optional criteria varies by community--some direct that specific criteria be used in addition to the legal criteria, while others use only the legal criteria. Examples of provided optional criteria that have been used in other communities are as follows:

The boundaries of the districts may consider avoiding pairing two or more incumbents in a single district, insofar as this does not conflict with the constitution and laws of the State of California and the United States.

To maintain a longer-term population balance, districts known to be areas of higher thanaverage population growth following districting may be under-populated within the population deviation amounts allowed by law.

The boundaries of the districts may comply with such other factors which become known 152
during the districting process and are formally adopted by the City Council.

Draft Revised City Council District Maps
The City and the consultant team accepted draft maps from the public for this third Public Hearing up until January 6, 2023 (see Exhibit C). Prior to the January 6, 2023 deadline, a total of ten (10) draft maps were submitted by the public. After careful review and analysis by NDC, eight (8) of the submitted draft maps meet the requirements of the Voter Rights Act as described above, and two (2) of the submitted draft maps do not meet the requirements of the Voter Rights Act. One (1) map was not population-balanced (Map 103) and one (1) is a singledistrict map (Map 110). Additionally, fifteen (15) uncompleted maps, provided in Exhibit A, were submitted recommending no districting at all and were in favor of “one” district or at-large elections.

The city’s demographer, Dr. Justin Levitt, also prepared four (4) draft City Council district boundary maps (Maps 111, 112, 113, and 114) based on the legal criteria outlined in past meetings, including consideration of communities of interest as provided by the community at the Community Workshops held in September, October, and December. The draft maps are intended for discussion purposes only; the demographer is not recommending approval of any proposed map. Dr. Levitt reviewed each map and prepared a demographic summary for each public submittal. Each of the proposed maps were posted on the City’s Districting webpage for public access and review (www.drawsantapaula.org).

Staff and the demographer are requesting that the City Council hold a public hearing, take testimony from the public and provide input on the draft maps submitted through January 6, 2023. Please note the City will continue to receive draft maps from the public until the final deadline of February 1. 2023, and will have posted all draft maps to the website at www.drawsantapaula.org by February 8, 2023, with the final set of draft maps to be reviewed and the anticipation of a map selected at the February 15, 2023, fourth Public Hearing.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is not a goal or objective within City Council's two-year Strategic Plan.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

The City is spending approximately $100,000 on the two consulting firms assisting the City with this highly specialized districting process. On May 4, 2022, Council set aside $50,000 for anticipated expenses. Staff will be coming to Council with a mid-year budget adjustment request for an additional $50,000 to complete the districting process.

OPTIONS:

ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit A - District Formation Process Outreach Summary Report Exhibit B - Community Workshops.pdf
Exhibit C - Draft Maps.pdf
153

EXHIBIT A -
District Formation
Process Outreach
Summary Report
154
District Formation Process
Outreach Summary Report
January 12, 2023
155
2 Introduction 3
Background on Santa Paula’s Districting Process 3
Building an Outreach Team 3
Spanning Channels of Outreach 4
Direct Call and Email Outreach 5
Contact List 5
Email Copies 6
Districting Website 7
Collateral Materials 8
Social Media Advertisement (English and Spanish) 8
Flyers (English and Spanish) 10
Press Releases (English and Spanish) 11
Channel 4 Advertisements (English and Spanish) 12
Community Meetings 13
Public Input Received on Communities of Interest 13
September 14, 2022 Community Meeting – Santa Paula Cultural Arts Building 13 Written Public Comments Submitted 14
156
3 Introduction
The City of Santa Paula has launched an aggressive outreach effort to reach the Santa Paula community to engage and educate the public about the district formation process. This outreach summary report is intended to provide a high-level overview of the outreach philosophy, process and results to date.

Background on Santa Paula’s Districting Process
On February 22, 2022, the City received a letter challenging the City’s current election system and asserting that the City’s at-large election system violates the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA).

The City of Santa Paula is not unique in this situation. Agencies throughout the State have received similar demand letters prompting a shift from at-large to district-based elections. While it is unclear if the City’s current system runs afoul of existing law, the cost of litigation to defend the at-large system, coupled with the track record of other public agencies that have fought similar challenges, poses a significant financial and legal risk to the City. In light of the letter and to protect the City from financial and legal risks, Santa Paula has taken steps to consider transitioning its election process to district-based elections.

Building an Outreach Team
The City of Santa Paula built a team of professionals to effectively execute the community outreach component of the project. This team includes City of Santa Paula staff, Tripepi Smith and National Demographics Corporation (NDC). These parties have been meeting jointly on regular calls to discuss the project and coordinate efforts. The integration of the demographer (NDC) into the outreach plan was designed to ensure that communications properly contributed to the broader goals of public information and drawing maps. This team approach has helped to eliminate silos of knowledge in this critical project.

Tripepi Smith was engaged as an outreach expert on the districting process. The firm has a long history of collaboration with NDC and has worked with other cities to assist with their migration to district elections.

These outreach efforts were ably assisted by the City of Santa Paula’s communication team. 157
4 Spanning Channels of Outreach
The City of Santa Paula leveraged a full array of outreach platforms to connect with the public.

To date, the City has reached the community through the following:
● Email and/or phone contact with nearly 120 community leaders, organizations, residents and media contacts to proactively outreach to key stakeholders with districting related information.
● Rollout of the districting website, DrawSantaPaula.org, where extensive resources are available for the public to learn about the districting process, access all meeting materials and meeting information, draw maps based upon their understanding of communities of interest and submit them for consideration by City Council. ● Distributed an online neighborhood survey to develop a list of neighborhoods and “communities of interest" – DrawSantaPaula.org/Neighborhood-Survey ● 30 social media posts in English and Spanish published across Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Nextdoor from July 1, 2022 – January 17, 2023. ● Five flyers in English and Spanish to promote upcoming community meetings. ● Four press releases in English and Spanish distributed to the City’s media contacts. ● Four Channel 10 advertisements to promote upcoming community meetings. ● Four community meetings to discuss the districting process and gather public input on neighborhoods and communities of interest.

Following the January 18, 2023 hearing, the City plans to conduct the following:
● Email outreach to nearly 120 community leaders, organizations, residents and media contacts to proactively outreach to key stakeholders with districting related information. ● 10-12 social media posts in English and Spanish published across Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Nextdoor from January 18, 2023 through March/April 2023. ● An additional flyer in English and Spanish to promote final districting meetings. ● An additional press release in English and Spanish distributed to the City’s media contacts.
● An additional Channel 10 advertisement to promote final districting meetings. ● An additional community meeting to gather public input on submitted maps. 158
5 Direct Call and Email Outreach
The City of Santa Paula districting outreach team called and emailed nearly 120 community leaders, organizations, residents and media contacts to promote the city’s districting process and encourage community involvement. The full contact list is outlined below.

Contact List
• 21 organizations
o Boys & Girls Club of Santa Clara Valley
o Proyecto Esperanza / Our Lady of Guadalupe Church
o Santa Paula Chamber of Commerce
o Poder Popular (LUCHA)
o All Children Thrive
o Santa Paula Social Services Coalition (Represents over 20+ local nonprofits) o Santa Paula Latino Town Hall
o Blanchard Community Library
o Santa Clara Valley Hospice
o Spirit of Santa Paula
o Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy (CAUSE) o Santa Paula Family Resource Center
o Santa Paula Times
o Santa Paula Police Officers Association
o Santa Paula Society of the Arts
o Santa Paula Basin Pumpers Association
o Universalist Unitarian Church of Santa Paula
o Aglow International
o Santa Paula Art Museum
o Aviation Museum of Santa Paula
o Calvary Chapel Santa Paula
• 84 residents
• 14 media contacts
159
6 Email Copies
Five emails were sent to the email list laid out above promoting community each public meeting.

Below are three examples of emails that were sent out:

First Districting Public Hearing – Sent August 2, 2022
Second Districting Public Hearing – Sent August 16, 2022 September Community Workshop – Sent September 13, 2022
160
7 Districting Website
In the past six months (July 1, 2022 – December 31, 2022), there have been 1,318 sessions on the City’s districting website. A session is the period of time a user is actively engaged with the website. The website’s sessions in the past six months came from 829 users who viewed 2,231 pages.

Image Description: City of Santa Paula districting website home page.

From July 1, 2022 – December 31, 2022, the most popular page on the City’s website was the homepage with 571 views. The Schedule page is the next most popular page with 428 views.

Image Description: Top pages on the City’s districting website from July 1, 2022 – December 31, 2022. 161
8 Collateral Materials
Social Media Advertisement (English and Spanish)
From July 1, 2022 – January 17, 2023, the City of Santa Paula scheduled 30 different posts across Instagram, Twitter, Facebook and Nextdoor. Each social media post included a descriptive English caption with the Spanish translation underneath.

Social media content included:
• Information about the districting process and how to get involved • Information on the City’s various mapping tools
• Announcements and reminders about community meetings and important deadlines • Community meeting recaps
• A link to the City’s districting website
162
9 163
10 Flyers (English and Spanish)
A total of five English and Spanish flyers were distributed via social media and email. Below are two examples of flyers sent out:
164
11 Press Releases (English and Spanish)
A total of four English and Spanish press releases were distributed to Santa Paula media. Below are two examples:
165
12 Channel 4 Advertisements (English and Spanish)
A total of four English and Spanish flyers were streamed on Santa Paula’s Channel 4. Below is one example:
166
13 Community Meetings
The City of Santa Paula held three community meetings to engage the public and seek input on communities of interest.

September 14, 2022 – Santa Paula Cultural Arts Building October 6, 2022 – Virtual, Zoom Webinar
December 1, 2022 – Church of Guadalupe
To ensure most residents had the opportunity to participate, the City scheduled one virtual meeting and two in-person meetings at different locations in the City. National Demographics Corporation was present at each meeting to educate residents on the districting process and answer questions. Tripepi Smith facilitated the first two workshops and encouraged residents to engage in dialogue related to neighborhoods and communities of interest.

The City plans to hold an additional community meeting on January 21, 2023 to receive input on from the community on submitted maps.

Public Input Received on Communities of Interest
September 14, 2022 Community Meeting – Santa Paula Cultural Arts Building ● Retired and older group, West of Santa Paula (Foothill and Peck) ● Churches
● Mainstreet
● Library
● La Cabaña Restaurant
● Oaks near the hospital
● McKevett Elementary School
● Renters
● Downtown
● One district to represent renters
● Farm Workers
● Harvard, Santa Barbara
● Santa Maria St., 12th Street
● Commercial area – Hallock Dr.
● Condo dense area – Santa Paula St. to the freeway West of Palm ● Richmond Rd. to Santa Paula St. to the freeway (East of Ojai) ● Hillsborough Estates to Santa Paula St.
● Eastern Boundary: Ojai Road
● Western Boundary: Steckel
● Steckel West to the end of the City limit (Beckwith to include mobile homes) ● Hillsborough Estates & Oaks
● Harvest
● Bedford going South to the freeway
● Eastern boundary: Grant Ln.
● Western boundary: Ojai Rd.
167
1/1

Map
2 messages
Rey Frutos Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:17 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
I am TOTALLY opposed to what Mrs. Laura Espinoza wants.

Rey Frutos
2 attachments
VFW053 sp districting map.jpg
2192K
Concerns on re-districting SP.doc
104K
Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:28 PM
To: Rey Frutos
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Thank you for your submission.
[Quoted text hidden]
Written Public Comments Submitted
168

R E Y F R U T O S
S a n t a P a u l a, CA 93060
Concerns regarding the Districting of SP for voting:
**I attended the workshop on December 1st at Our Lady of Guadalupe Church hoping to get a clearer answer to re-districting and to my surprise, I felt that the workshop turned into a GRIPE session. Street maintenance, air conditioning, housing, parks, just to name a few, had NOTHING TO DO with redistricting. One of my biggest concerns was how many voters are in the 6,150 persons per district? All that was said was that every person had to be accounted for. I need to know how many Residents, Voting Citizens, Illegal persons. soon to become Voters (age 17)? Nobody seems to know. I addressed my other concerns in the following:
*First, I am in total agreement of Ms Gherardi’s letter to the SP Times Editor dated October 28th she too is a past Council member as well as Laura Espinoza, the author of the letter to the City of SP *Santa Paula is NOT large enough to have district voting. We are approximately 8 plus square miles in size with approximately 30,000 in population, number of voting citizens, I don’t know. What I do know is that Santa Paula does not have 30,000 voting citizens. *The loss of 4 votes really makes me angry especially when I know this is spearheaded by a Latino Organization. Let me set this straight, our forefathers were interested in that everyone eligible to vote had that opportunity to do so, which is our democratic way of governing. There might be rules set by the State but in our case, COMMON SENSE should be the rule due to our city size. If there are five persons that will govern a city, I should HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR FIVE not just one. *I hate to say this but as a home town grown Latino, let me put the shoe on the other foot; I don’t believe that Mrs. Espinoza would appreciate an Anglo Organization forcing her to lose her voting rights. Somehow I really feel like I’ve seen things like this in the past. Some groups want their finger in every part of the governing system. Just saying, as there are many out there that can also see the writing on the wall as I do. Why would anyone in their right mind want to divide a city the size of Santa Paula? San Francisco, San Jose, Los Angeles, San Diego, maybe, as they’re BIG SPREAD OUT CITIES but NOT SANTA PAULA.
*Why are we trying so hard to make Santa Paula five (5) communities within one (1) city/town? 169
170
12/19/22, 8:50 AM Tripepi Smith & Associates Mail - City of Santa Paula Re-districting Formation 1/1

City of Santa Paula Re-districting Formation
1 message
Jerry Olivas Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 2:12 PM
To: [email protected]
City of Santa Paula Re-districting formation process:

I wish to submit this email , attached letter and my One (1) District Map to the City of Santa Paula Re-districting formation process to which I am complete in disagreement with the concept of going to Five (5) Districts.

Thank you,
Gerald V. Olivas

Santa Paula, CA
2 attachments
Gerald Olivas Concerns on re-districting SP Map.docx
13K
City of SP 1 District Map GVO.pdf
41K
171
City of Santa Paula
Districting Input
Subject: District Map Proposal
I would like to submit my District Map proposal with this letter stating my complete disagreement with anyone wishing to Re-district the City of Santa Paula map from One (1) District to Five (5).

First, I am in complete agreement with M’s Ginger Gherardi’s Santa Paula Time letter dated October 28, 2022 in which she makes an excellent case for One (1) District.

In speaking with other Santa Paula residents, I would sincerely like to know where the common sense is when you give up the ability to vote for any Santa Paula resident wishing to represent the City and not just a specific district that will be at risk of being manipulated by a vindictive group of self-serving folks.

That was the case not so many years ago and we all fought extremely hard to make voting work for everyone and not just a controlling group of people with their self-interest of dictating who we should vote for.

It really pains me to see that some Americans of Mexican descent are behind this effort. Where is your “one America, one vote” slogan now? How quick some folks forget the pains and suffering of our parents and grandparents. Thank you.

Gerald V. Olivas
Santa Paula, CA
172
173
12/22/22, 8:19 AM Tripepi Smith & Associates Mail - City of Santa Paula Re-districting Formation 1/1

City of Santa Paula Re-districting Formation
Jerry Olivas Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:49 PM
To: [email protected]
I am attaching my City of Santa Paula Map for only One (1) Voting District.

I am 100% NOT In Favor of Five (5) Districts.

Thank you,
Margarete Olivas

Santa Paula, CA
Margarete Olivas One District.pdf
42K
174
175
12/22/22, 8:20 AM Tripepi Smith & Associates Mail - My “one district” map for Santa Paula 1/1

My “one district” map for Santa Paula
2 messages
Richard Rudman Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Sent from my iPhone
IMG_6632.jpg
1023K
Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 8:18 AM
To: Richard Rudman
Cc: [email protected]
Thank you for your submission.

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 8:53 PM Richard Rudman wrote:

Sent from my iPhone
176
177
12/22/22, 12:38 PM Tripepi Smith & Associates Mail - Redistrict 1/2

Redistrict
2 messages
Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:33 AM
To: [email protected]
This is what I want – NO DISTRICTS! Do not bend to a lawsuit by Laura Espinosa, she has done so much damage to our City only for her benefit. Please do not break out city into districts we are too small of a town.

Mary PendletonDeines
70 year resident
Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 12:38 PM
178
12/23/22, 7:53 AM Tripepi Smith & Associates Mail - FW: One District for Santa Paula https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=6bc489bf0b&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1752887943050708172&simpl=msg-f%3A1752959455497529015 1/1

FW: One District for Santa Paula
1 message
Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 3:40 PM

From:

Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 8:43 PM
To: Districting Districting <[email protected]>
Cc: 'Richard Rudman'
Subject: FW: One District for Santa Paula
Below is my map creating one district for Santa Paula. We do not need any more than one. Thank you.

Ginger Gherardi
[cid:F4DABF87-BDB9-45D8-B5F7-FEDE2BA3456B]
“This is an electronic transmission from the City of Santa Paula. This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. The information is intended only for use by the recipient named above. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender and delete the electronic message.”
One District For Santa Paula.jpeg
101K
179
180
1/5/23, 1:32 PM Tripepi Smith & Associates Mail - District voting 1/1

District voting
2 messages
Chris Wilson Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 11:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Hello
I am writing to express my support for NOT CHANGING TO DISTRICT BASED VOTING. As an elected member of the Santa Paula Unified School District I have personally benefited from district based elections which made my last race easy.

I believe the district system limits the number of candidates for office in an unhealthy manner.

Chris Wilson
Trustee, Santa Paula Unified School District

181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191

EXHIBIT B -
Community
Workshops
192
1 Districting Outreach Efforts
 Email and/or phone contact with nearly 120 community leaders, organizations, residents and media
 Rollout of the districting website, DrawSantaPaula.org  Distributed an online Neighborhood Survey to develop a list of neighborhoods and “communities of interest"
 Three community meetings (2 in-person, 1 virtual)
 30 social media posts
 English and Spanish
 Published across Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Nextdoor  July 1, 2022 – January 17, 2023
 Five flyers in English and Spanish to promote upcoming community meetings.
 Four press releases in English and Spanish distributed to the City’s media contacts.
 Four Channel 10 advertisements to promote upcoming community meetings.

January 18, 2023 193
January 18, 2023 2
September 14,
2022
Community
Workshop
194
January 18, 2023 3
December 1,
2022
Community
Workshop
195

EXHIBIT C -

DRAFT MAPS
196
4 3
5 1
2 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Cameron St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
Foothill Rd
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Atmore Dr
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
Montclair Dr
Peck Pl
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
Eliot St
W Santa
W
B
a
arbara St
Mu
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Hardison St
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St Walnut St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 101
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 2 - 2024 or 2026 (Chavez, Cornejo & Sobel)
District 3 - 2026 (Juarez)
District 4 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 5 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
Map layers
Map 101
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 197
Map 101
District 1
Total Pop 6,372
Deviation from ideal 218
% Deviation 3.54%
% Hisp 87.4%
% NH White 10%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 1%
Total 3,066
% Hisp 73%
% NH White 24%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 2%
Total 2,591
% Latino est. 79%
% Spanish-Surnamed 73%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 25%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,957
% Latino est. 76%
% Spanish-Surnamed 70%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 27%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,197
% Latino est. 71%
% Spanish-Surnamed 65%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 32%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,410
age0-19 31%
age20-60 52%
age60plus 18%
immigrants 29%
naturalized 24%
english 28%
spanish 71%
asian-lang 0%
other lang 1%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 32%
hs-grad 46%
bachelor 6%
graduatedegree 3%
Child in Household child-under18 42%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 55%
income 0-25k 17%
income 25-50k 31%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 34%
income 200k-plus 1%
single family 66%
multi-family 34%
rented 49%
owned 51%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,112
-42
-0.68%
62%
34%
1%
1%
3,735
51%
46%
0%
2%
3,981
52%
48%
1%
1%
50%
0%
3,376
51%
46%
1%
1%
51%
0%
2,391
44%
40%
0%
1%
57%
0%
5,699
31%
47%
22%
26%
39%
54%
45%
0%
1%
17%
45%
16%
14%
31%
54%
19%
12%
19%
36%
14%
95%
5%
25%
75%
3 5,905
-249
-4.05%
79%
17%
0%
1%
4,042
73%
23%
0%
2%
3,266
75%
68%
0%
1%
30%
0%
2,624
73%
66%
0%
1%
32%
0%
1,800
69%
63%
0%
0%
36%
0%
5,818
24%
55%
21%
22%
53%
42%
57%
0%
1%
20%
62%
10%
5%
30%
64%
10%
15%
28%
45%
2%
90%
10%
34%
66%
4 5,962
-192
-3.12%
85%
12%
0%
1%
2,521
80%
18%
0%
1%
2,272
76%
70%
1%
1%
27%
0%
1,700
73%
67%
1%
1%
30%
0%
1,106
66%
61%
1%
1%
36%
0%
5,923
42%
47%
11%
29%
26%
36%
64%
0%
0%
29%
58%
6%
2%
53%
59%
27%
27%
20%
25%
0%
57%
43%
67%
33%
5 6,421
267

4.34%
94%
4%
0%
0%
2,660
90%
8%
2%
0%
2,191
90%
84%
0%
1%
9%
2%
1,558
90%
84%
0%
1%
9%
2%
916
87%
83%
0%
1%
10%
2%
6,691
32%
54%
14%
32%
28%
24%
76%
0%
0%
36%
44%
6%
2%
44%
59%
21%
31%
18%
30%
1%
74%
26%
68%
32%
Total
30,772
516

8.38%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/08/2023 17:27 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
198
4 1
3 2
5 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
N
7th
St
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
E
W
liot St
M
a
u
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St Walnut St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 102
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2026 (Juarez)
District 2 - 2024 (vacant)
District 3 - 2024 (Cornejo & Sobel)
District 4 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 5 - 2026 (Chavez)
Map layers
Map 102
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 199
Map 102
District 1
Total Pop 6,229
Deviation from ideal 75
% Deviation 1.22%
% Hisp 80.8%
% NH White 16%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 1%
Total 4,127
% Hisp 76%
% NH White 21%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 1%
Total 3,366
% Latino est. 77%
% Spanish-Surnamed 70%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 28%
% NH Black 0%
Total 2,678
% Latino est. 74%
% Spanish-Surnamed 67%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 31%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,798
% Latino est. 68%
% Spanish-Surnamed 63%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 0%
% NH White est. 36%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,125
age0-19 24%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 45%
english 36%
spanish 62%
asian-lang 1%
other lang 1%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 21%
hs-grad 57%
bachelor 10%
graduatedegree 5%
Child in Household child-under18 33%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 9%
income 25-50k 18%
income 50-75k 26%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 3%
single family 91%
multi-family 9%
rented 33%
owned 67%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,295
141

2.29%
87%
11%
0%
1%
3,172
71%
26%
0%
1%
2,262
77%
70%
1%
1%
28%
0%
1,730
74%
68%
1%
1%
30%
0%
1,172
70%
64%
0%
1%
34%
0%
6,750
35%
51%
14%
26%
27%
34%
66%
0%
1%
29%
52%
7%
3%
48%
55%
20%
31%
15%
33%
1%
59%
41%
57%
43%
3 6,231
77 1.25%
63%
32%
1%
2%
3,847
55%
43%
0%
2%
4,029
54%
50%
1%
1%
48%
0%
3,409
53%
48%
1%
1%
49%
0%
2,534
46%
42%
0%
1%
56%
0%
5,857
30%
48%
22%
25%
42%
51%
48%
0%
1%
18%
47%
15%
13%
31%
55%
18%
11%
22%
38%
12%
94%
6%
24%
76%
4 6,199
45 0.73%
86%
11%
0%
1%
2,328
78%
19%
1%
2%
2,417
78%
71%
1%
1%
25%
1%
1,784
75%
68%
1%
1%
27%
1%
1,048
67%
63%
0%
1%
33%
1%
5,587
38%
49%
14%
35%
21%
31%
68%
0%
0%
34%
53%
4%
2%
43%
59%
26%
26%
23%
25%
1%
60%
40%
68%
32%
5 5,818
-336
-5.46%
92%
6%
0%
0%
2,551
87%
11%
1%
1%
2,227
85%
80%
0%
2%
14%
1%
1,614
85%
79%
0%
1%
15%
1%
858
87%
83%
0%
1%
11%
1%
6,221
33%
52%
15%
30%
31%
28%
71%
0%
0%
34%
45%
7%
2%
46%
59%
20%
31%
16%
31%
1%
78%
22%
63%
37%
Total
30,772
477

7.75%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/08/2023 17:35 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
200
3 5
4 1
2 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
W Santa Barbara St
Bradley
St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
Eliot St
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St Walnut St
Blanchard
Ave
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 103
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 2 - 2026 (Chavez & Juarez)
District 3 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 4 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 5 - 2024 (Cornejo & Sobel)
Not population-balanced
Map layers
Map 103
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 201
Map 103
District 1
Total Pop 10,146
Deviation from ideal 3,992
% Deviation 64.87%
% Hisp 87.3%
% NH White 10%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 1%
Total 5,148
% Hisp 80%
% NH White 17%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 1%
Total 4,107
% Latino est. 81%
% Spanish-Surnamed 74%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 24%
% NH Black 0%
Total 3,099
% Latino est. 80%
% Spanish-Surnamed 73%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 25%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,866
% Latino est. 76%
% Spanish-Surnamed 69%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 29%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 10,212
age0-19 34%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 12%
immigrants 29%
naturalized 30%
english 34%
spanish 66%
asian-lang 0%
other lang 0%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 28%
hs-grad 52%
bachelor 7%
graduatedegree 3%
Child in Household child-under18 43%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 21%
income 25-50k 23%
income 50-75k 19%
income 75-200k 36%
income 200k-plus 1%
single family 61%
multi-family 39%
rented 54%
owned 46%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 4,811
-1,343
-21.82%
80%
17%
0%
1%
3,083
64%
32%
0%
2%
2,466
69%
63%
1%
1%
35%
0%
1,930
65%
59%
1%
1%
38%
0%
1,184
59%
55%
1%
1%
43%
0%
5,149
24%
52%
24%
23%
31%
41%
58%
0%
1%
25%
50%
9%
6%
34%
58%
8%
31%
21%
37%
3%
91%
9%
44%
56%
3 4,744
-1,410
-22.91%
87%
10%
1%
1%
1,772
82%
13%
2%
2%
1,670
78%
72%
1%
1%
21%
2%
1,231
74%
69%
1%
1%
24%
2%
799
69%
65%
0%
1%
27%
2%
4,476
38%
51%
12%
33%
22%
29%
71%
0%
0%
34%
55%
4%
1%
47%
61%
23%
27%
25%
25%
0%
62%
38%
74%
26%
4 5,094
-1,060
-17.22%
69%
27%
0%
1%
3,003
59%
39%
0%
2%
3,090
62%
57%
0%
1%
40%
0%
2,607
61%
56%
0%
1%
42%
0%
1,921
55%
51%
0%
1%
46%
0%
4,851
33%
47%
21%
22%
45%
47%
51%
0%
1%
20%
50%
13%
12%
33%
53%
16%
14%
20%
38%
12%
89%
11%
27%
73%
5 5,977
-177
-2.88%
80%
17%
0%
1%
3,019
73%
26%
0%
0%
2,968
68%
63%
0%
1%
34%
0%
2,348
65%
60%
0%
1%
37%
0%
1,640
57%
53%
0%
1%
45%
0%
5,851
30%
49%
20%
32%
36%
32%
68%
0%
0%
29%
47%
11%
6%
40%
56%
22%
21%
20%
33%
4%
90%
10%
41%
59%
Total
30,772
5,402

87.78%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/08/2023 17:47 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.

Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
202
4 3
1 5
2 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
E
W
liot St
M
a
u
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
Walnut St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2024 (Sobel)
District 2 - 2024 or 2026 (Chavez & Cornejo)
District 3 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 4 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 5 - 2026 (Juarez)
Map layers
Map 104
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area
Map 104
203
Map 104
District 1
Total Pop 6,094
Deviation from ideal -60
% Deviation -0.97%
% Hisp 92.1%
% NH White 6%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 0%
Total 2,690
% Hisp 89%
% NH White 9%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 0%
Total 2,279
% Latino est. 87%
% Spanish-Surnamed 81%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 13%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,643
% Latino est. 86%
% Spanish-Surnamed 80%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 14%
% NH Black 1%
Total 990
% Latino est. 81%
% Spanish-Surnamed 77%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 18%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,590
age0-19 31%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 15%
immigrants 31%
naturalized 30%
english 25%
spanish 74%
asian-lang 0%
other lang 0%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 37%
hs-grad 42%
bachelor 7%
graduatedegree 2%
Child in Household child-under18 44%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 58%
income 0-25k 21%
income 25-50k 31%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 30%
income 200k-plus 1%
single family 79%
multi-family 21%
rented 63%
owned 37%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,074
-80
-1.30%
62%
34%
1%
2%
3,851
52%
45%
0%
2%
4,016
54%
50%
1%
1%
48%
0%
3,443
53%
49%
1%
1%
49%
0%
2,516
48%
44%
0%
1%
54%
0%
5,565
29%
46%
25%
26%
44%
53%
46%
0%
1%
16%
52%
15%
12%
29%
52%
14%
12%
24%
39%
11%
97%
3%
22%
78%
3 6,174
20 0.32%
83%
14%
0%
1%
2,454
74%
23%
0%
2%
2,595
73%
67%
1%
1%
29%
0%
1,984
70%
64%
1%
1%
32%
0%
1,268
64%
59%
1%
1%
37%
0%
5,486
39%
47%
13%
33%
24%
36%
64%
0%
0%
29%
57%
6%
4%
44%
59%
27%
23%
22%
25%
3%
63%
37%
62%
38%
4 6,144
-10
-0.16%
91%
7%
0%
1%
2,901
82%
15%
0%
2%
2,083
86%
79%
1%
1%
18%
0%
1,544
85%
78%
1%
1%
19%
0%
936
81%
74%
0%
1%
24%
0%
6,449
35%
55%
9%
28%
28%
28%
71%
0%
0%
32%
50%
6%
3%
49%
60%
23%
26%
17%
34%
0%
51%
49%
61%
39%
5 6,286
132

2.14%
80%
16%
0%
1%
4,129
71%
26%
0%
2%
3,328
73%
66%
1%
1%
32%
0%
2,601
70%
64%
1%
1%
34%
0%
1,700
64%
59%
1%
0%
39%
0%
6,449
25%
53%
22%
22%
39%
40%
58%
0%
1%
22%
56%
9%
5%
34%
61%
9%
24%
22%
42%
3%
89%
11%
36%
64%
Total
30,772
212

3.44%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/08/2023 18:10 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.

Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
204
4 3
1 5
2 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
E
W
liot St
M
a
u
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
Walnut St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 105
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 2 - 2024 or 2026 (Chavez, Cornejo, & Sobel)
District 3 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 4 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 5 - 2026 (Juarez)
Map layers
Map 105
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 205
Map 105
District 1
Total Pop 6,023
Deviation from ideal -131
% Deviation -2.13%
% Hisp 92.2%
% NH White 5%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 0%
Total 2,668
% Hisp 88%
% NH White 9%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 1%
Total 2,189
% Latino est. 88%
% Spanish-Surnamed 82%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 11%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,577
% Latino est. 88%
% Spanish-Surnamed 81%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 12%
% NH Black 1%
Total 907
% Latino est. 84%
% Spanish-Surnamed 80%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 14%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,543
age0-19 32%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 15%
immigrants 30%
naturalized 30%
english 27%
spanish 73%
asian-lang 0%
other lang 0%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 36%
hs-grad 42%
bachelor 7%
graduatedegree 2%
Child in Household child-under18 45%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 58%
income 0-25k 20%
income 25-50k 32%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 30%
income 200k-plus 1%
single family 79%
multi-family 21%
rented 64%
owned 36%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,145
-9
-0.15%
62%
34%
1%
2%
3,872
53%
45%
0%
2%
4,106
55%
50%
1%
1%
48%
0%
3,509
53%
49%
1%
1%
49%
0%
2,599
48%
44%
0%
1%
54%
0%
5,612
28%
46%
25%
26%
44%
51%
48%
0%
1%
17%
51%
15%
12%
29%
52%
15%
12%
24%
38%
10%
96%
4%
23%
77%
3 6,174
20 0.32%
83%
14%
0%
1%
2,454
74%
23%
0%
2%
2,595
73%
67%
1%
1%
29%
0%
1,984
70%
64%
1%
1%
32%
0%
1,268
64%
59%
1%
1%
37%
0%
5,486
39%
47%
13%
33%
24%
36%
64%
0%
0%
29%
57%
6%
4%
44%
59%
27%
23%
22%
25%
3%
63%
37%
62%
38%
4 6,144
-10
-0.16%
91%
7%
0%
1%
2,901
82%
15%
0%
2%
2,083
86%
79%
1%
1%
18%
0%
1,544
85%
78%
1%
1%
19%
0%
936
81%
74%
0%
1%
24%
0%
6,449
35%
55%
9%
28%
28%
28%
71%
0%
0%
32%
50%
6%
3%
49%
60%
23%
26%
17%
34%
0%
51%
49%
61%
39%
5 6,286
132

2.14%
80%
16%
0%
1%
4,129
71%
26%
0%
2%
3,328
73%
66%
1%
1%
32%
0%
2,601
70%
64%
1%
1%
34%
0%
1,700
64%
59%
1%
0%
39%
0%
6,449
25%
53%
22%
22%
39%
40%
58%
0%
1%
22%
56%
9%
5%
34%
61%
9%
24%
22%
42%
3%
89%
11%
36%
64%
Total
30,772
263

4.27%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/08/2023 18:10 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
206
2 1
4 3
5 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N 14th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
E Harvard Blvd
E Santa Barbara St
Munger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
Telegraph Rd
March St
E
W
liot St akeford Ave
W Santa Paula St
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St Walnut St
Staben
Ct
N
Ojai St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 106
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2026 (Juarez)
District 2 - 2024 (Cornejo & Sobel)
District 3 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 4 - 2024 (vacant)
District 5 - 2026 (Chavez)
Map layers
Map 106
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 207
Map 106
District 1
Total Pop 6,063
Deviation from ideal -91
% Deviation -1.48%
% Hisp 80.9%
% NH White 16%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 1%
Total 4,017
% Hisp 76%
% NH White 21%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 1%
Total 3,273
% Latino est. 77%
% Spanish-Surnamed 70%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 28%
% NH Black 0%
Total 2,600
% Latino est. 74%
% Spanish-Surnamed 67%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 31%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,748
% Latino est. 68%
% Spanish-Surnamed 63%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 0%
% NH White est. 35%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 5,949
age0-19 24%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 24%
naturalized 45%
english 36%
spanish 62%
asian-lang 1%
other lang 1%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 21%
hs-grad 57%
bachelor 10%
graduatedegree 5%
Child in Household child-under18 33%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 62%
income 0-25k 9%
income 25-50k 18%
income 50-75k 26%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 3%
single family 91%
multi-family 9%
rented 33%
owned 67%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,197
43 0.70%
89%
9%
0%
1%
3,083
80%
17%
0%
1%
2,174
83%
76%
1%
1%
21%
0%
1,667
81%
75%
0%
1%
23%
0%
1,133
77%
71%
0%
1%
27%
0%
6,592
35%
55%
10%
26%
30%
30%
69%
0%
1%
30%
51%
7%
4%
49%
59%
22%
24%
17%
35%
1%
55%
45%
57%
43%
3 6,504
350

5.69%
73%
23%
1%
1%
3,114
61%
35%
0%
3%
3,407
61%
56%
1%
1%
41%
0%
2,724
58%
53%
1%
1%
43%
0%
1,797
49%
45%
1%
1%
51%
0%
5,965
39%
46%
15%
27%
31%
47%
52%
0%
1%
23%
53%
10%
9%
41%
58%
24%
19%
19%
29%
10%
76%
24%
48%
52%
4 5,984
-170
-2.76%
81%
16%
0%
1%
2,910
73%
26%
1%
0%
2,857
68%
64%
0%
1%
33%
0%
2,248
66%
61%
0%
1%
36%
0%
1,604
58%
55%
0%
1%
43%
0%
5,870
32%
48%
20%
32%
35%
33%
67%
0%
0%
29%
48%
10%
5%
40%
56%
22%
23%
20%
32%
4%
88%
12%
43%
57%
5 6,024
-130
-2.11%
85%
12%
0%
1%
2,900
67%
30%
1%
2%
2,590
75%
69%
1%
1%
27%
1%
1,976
72%
66%
1%
1%
30%
1%
1,128
68%
64%
1%
1%
32%
1%
6,163
29%
51%
20%
30%
22%
36%
63%
0%
0%
33%
46%
6%
3%
36%
55%
16%
32%
19%
32%
1%
74%
26%
59%
41%
Total
30,772
520

8.45%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/08/2023 23:08 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
208
4 3
1 5
2 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
E
W
liot St
M
a
u
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
Walnut St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 107
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2024 (Sobel)
District 2 - 2024 or 2026 (Chavez & Cornejo)
District 3 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 4 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 5 - 2026 (Juarez)
Map layers
Map 107
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 209
Map 107
District 1
Total Pop 6,094
Deviation from ideal -60
% Deviation -0.97%
% Hisp 92.1%
% NH White 6%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 0%
Total 2,690
% Hisp 89%
% NH White 9%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 0%
Total 2,279
% Latino est. 87%
% Spanish-Surnamed 81%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 13%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,643
% Latino est. 86%
% Spanish-Surnamed 80%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 14%
% NH Black 1%
Total 990
% Latino est. 81%
% Spanish-Surnamed 77%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 18%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,590
age0-19 31%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 15%
immigrants 31%
naturalized 30%
english 25%
spanish 74%
asian-lang 0%
other lang 0%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 37%
hs-grad 42%
bachelor 7%
graduatedegree 2%
Child in Household child-under18 44%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 58%
income 0-25k 21%
income 25-50k 31%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 30%
income 200k-plus 1%
single family 79%
multi-family 21%
rented 63%
owned 37%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,134
-20
-0.32%
62%
33%
1%
2%
3,886
52%
45%
0%
2%
4,052
55%
50%
1%
1%
48%
0%
3,474
53%
49%
1%
1%
49%
0%
2,542
48%
44%
0%
1%
54%
0%
5,611
29%
46%
25%
26%
44%
53%
46%
0%
1%
16%
52%
15%
12%
28%
52%
14%
12%
24%
39%
11%
97%
3%
22%
78%
3 6,174
20 0.32%
83%
14%
0%
1%
2,454
74%
23%
0%
2%
2,595
73%
67%
1%
1%
29%
0%
1,984
70%
64%
1%
1%
32%
0%
1,268
64%
59%
1%
1%
37%
0%
5,486
39%
47%
13%
33%
24%
36%
64%
0%
0%
29%
57%
6%
4%
44%
59%
27%
23%
22%
25%
3%
63%
37%
62%
38%
4 6,144
-10
-0.16%
91%
7%
0%
1%
2,901
82%
15%
0%
2%
2,083
86%
79%
1%
1%
18%
0%
1,544
85%
78%
1%
1%
19%
0%
936
81%
74%
0%
1%
24%
0%
6,449
35%
55%
9%
28%
28%
28%
71%
0%
0%
32%
50%
6%
3%
49%
60%
23%
26%
17%
34%
0%
51%
49%
61%
39%
5 6,226
72 1.17%
80%
16%
0%
1%
4,093
71%
26%
0%
2%
3,292
73%
66%
1%
1%
32%
0%
2,570
70%
64%
1%
1%
34%
0%
1,674
64%
59%
1%
0%
39%
0%
6,403
25%
53%
22%
22%
39%
40%
58%
0%
1%
22%
56%
9%
5%
34%
61%
9%
24%
22%
42%
3%
89%
11%
36%
64%
Total
30,772
132

2.14%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/08/2023 23:12 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
210
4 3
1 5
2 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
N
7th
St
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
E
W
liot St
M
a
u
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 108
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 2 - 2024 or 2026 (Chavez, Cornejo, & Sobel)
District 3 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 4 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 5 - 2026 (Juarez)
Map layers
Map 108
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 211
Map 108
District 1
Total Pop 6,177
Deviation from ideal 23
% Deviation 0.37%
% Hisp 92.4%
% NH White 6%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 0%
Total 2,639
% Hisp 91%
% NH White 7%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 0%
Total 2,264
% Latino est. 87%
% Spanish-Surnamed 81%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 12%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,635
% Latino est. 86%
% Spanish-Surnamed 80%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 14%
% NH Black 1%
Total 979
% Latino est. 81%
% Spanish-Surnamed 78%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 17%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,637
age0-19 33%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 14%
immigrants 30%
naturalized 30%
english 25%
spanish 75%
asian-lang 0%
other lang 0%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 37%
hs-grad 43%
bachelor 7%
graduatedegree 2%
Child in Household child-under18 46%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 59%
income 0-25k 20%
income 25-50k 31%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 30%
income 200k-plus 1%
single family 78%
multi-family 22%
rented 64%
owned 36%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,137
-17
-0.28%
62%
33%
1%
2%
3,717
51%
46%
0%
3%
3,939
52%
48%
1%
1%
50%
0%
3,323
50%
46%
1%
1%
51%
0%
2,380
44%
41%
0%
1%
57%
0%
5,785
31%
47%
22%
26%
39%
54%
45%
0%
1%
17%
45%
16%
14%
31%
53%
17%
12%
20%
37%
14%
95%
5%
25%
75%
3 6,208
54 0.88%
87%
10%
0%
1%
2,291
77%
20%
0%
2%
2,489
80%
73%
1%
1%
23%
1%
1,848
77%
71%
1%
1%
25%
1%
1,098
71%
66%
0%
1%
29%
1%
5,587
40%
47%
13%
35%
21%
30%
70%
0%
0%
34%
54%
4%
2%
45%
58%
29%
27%
21%
23%
0%
54%
46%
68%
32%
4 6,078
-76
-1.23%
88%
10%
0%
1%
3,310
80%
17%
0%
1%
2,208
82%
75%
0%
1%
24%
0%
1,690
79%
73%
0%
1%
25%
0%
1,123
77%
71%
0%
1%
28%
0%
6,319
33%
57%
11%
26%
34%
32%
67%
0%
0%
27%
55%
8%
3%
45%
61%
19%
22%
19%
39%
1%
62%
38%
53%
47%
5 6,172
18 0.29%
79%
17%
0%
1%
4,067
69%
28%
0%
2%
3,401
73%
66%
1%
1%
32%
0%
2,719
70%
63%
1%
1%
35%
0%
1,830
63%
58%
1%
0%
40%
0%
6,213
24%
51%
25%
22%
41%
40%
58%
0%
1%
22%
56%
9%
5%
32%
59%
9%
24%
24%
41%
3%
92%
8%
33%
67%
Total
30,772
130

2.11%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/08/2023 23:22 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.

Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
212
4 3
1 2
5 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
N 10th
St S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
E
W
liot St
M
a
u
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St Walnut St
Staben
Ct
N
Ojai St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 109
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 2 - 2024 (Cornejo & Sobel)
District 3 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 4 - 2024 or 2026 (vacant)
District 5 - 2026 (Chavez & Juarez)
Map layers
Map 109
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 213
Map 109
District 1
Total Pop 6,137
Deviation from ideal -17
% Deviation -0.28%
% Hisp 92.8%
% NH White 5%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 0%
Total 2,640
% Hisp 91%
% NH White 7%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 0%
Total 2,275
% Latino est. 87%
% Spanish-Surnamed 81%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 12%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,640
% Latino est. 87%
% Spanish-Surnamed 81%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 13%
% NH Black 1%
Total 936
% Latino est. 84%
% Spanish-Surnamed 80%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 14%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,598
age0-19 33%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 14%
immigrants 30%
naturalized 30%
english 25%
spanish 75%
asian-lang 0%
other lang 0%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 37%
hs-grad 43%
bachelor 7%
graduatedegree 2%
Child in Household child-under18 46%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 59%
income 0-25k 20%
income 25-50k 31%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 30%
income 200k-plus 2%
single family 78%
multi-family 22%
rented 64%
owned 36%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,097
-57
-0.93%
62%
34%
1%
2%
3,843
53%
45%
0%
2%
4,069
54%
50%
1%
1%
48%
0%
3,485
53%
48%
1%
1%
50%
0%
2,655
47%
43%
0%
1%
55%
0%
5,562
29%
46%
26%
26%
44%
50%
48%
0%
1%
17%
51%
15%
12%
29%
52%
15%
12%
24%
38%
11%
96%
4%
22%
78%
3 6,163
9 0.15%
85%
12%
0%
1%
2,359
76%
21%
0%
2%
2,522
76%
70%
1%
1%
26%
0%
1,898
73%
67%
1%
1%
28%
0%
1,199
66%
62%
1%
1%
33%
0%
5,525
40%
47%
13%
34%
23%
34%
65%
0%
0%
31%
55%
6%
3%
45%
58%
28%
25%
21%
24%
2%
59%
41%
64%
36%
4 6,159
5 0.08%
90%
8%
0%
1%
3,124
81%
16%
0%
1%
2,137
84%
77%
1%
1%
21%
0%
1,588
83%
76%
1%
1%
22%
0%
998
80%
73%
0%
1%
25%
0%
6,503
34%
57%
9%
27%
30%
30%
69%
0%
0%
30%
52%
7%
3%
48%
62%
21%
23%
18%
37%
0%
55%
45%
58%
42%
5 6,216
62 1.01%
79%
17%
0%
1%
4,057
68%
29%
0%
2%
3,298
72%
65%
1%
1%
32%
0%
2,604
69%
63%
1%
1%
35%
0%
1,622
63%
59%
1%
0%
39%
0%
6,353
25%
52%
23%
23%
38%
42%
56%
0%
1%
22%
55%
9%
5%
33%
59%
9%
26%
21%
41%
3%
91%
9%
36%
64%
Total
30,772
119

1.93%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/08/2023 23:41 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
214
1 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Cameron St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
Foothill Rd
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Atmore Dr
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
Montclair Dr
Peck Pl
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
Eliot St
W Santa
W
B
a
arbara St
Mu
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Hardison St
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St Walnut St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 110
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Single District Map
Map layers
Map 110
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 215
Map 110
District
Total Pop 24,472
Deviation from ideal
% Deviation
% Hisp 81.5%
% NH White 16%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 1%
Total 12,118
% Hisp 70%
% NH White 28%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 2%
Total 11,178
% Latino est. 70%
% Spanish-Surnamed 64%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 32%
% NH Black 0%
Total 8,705
% Latino est. 67%
% Spanish-Surnamed 61%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 35%
% NH Black 0%
Total 5,701
% Latino est. 59%
% Spanish-Surnamed 55%
% Asian-Surnamed 0%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 42%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 24,350
age0-19 33%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 17%
immigrants 29%
naturalized 29%
english 36%
spanish 63%
asian-lang 0%
other lang 1%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 29%
hs-grad 49%
bachelor 9%
graduatedegree 6%
Child in Household child-under18 40%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 58%
income 0-25k 20%
income 25-50k 25%
income 50-75k 19%
income 75-200k 32%
income 200k-plus 4%
single family 75%
multi-family 25%
rented 52%
owned 48%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 1 6,300
146

2.37%
83%
14%
0%
1%
3,906
79%
19%
0%
1%
3,123
80%
72%
1%
1%
26%
0%
2,510
78%
71%
1%
1%
27%
0%
1,709
74%
68%
1%
0%
30%
0%
6,190
28%
54%
18%
25%
45%
36%
63%
1%
0%
21%
57%
10%
4%
37%
60%
12%
17%
25%
44%
2%
84%
16%
31%
69%
Total
30,772
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/10/2023 12:29 Page 1 of 2
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
216
01/10/2023 12:29 Page 2 of 2
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
217
3 4
1 2
5 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
E
W
liot St
M
a
u
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St Walnut St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 111
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2026 (Juarez)
District 2 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 3 - 2024 (vacant)
District 4 - 2024 (Cornejo & Sobel)
District 5 - 2026 (Chavez)
Map layers
Plan 111
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 218
Map 111
District 1
Total Pop 6,229
Deviation from ideal 75
% Deviation 1.22%
% Hisp 80.8%
% NH White 16%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 1%
Total 4,127
% Hisp 76%
% NH White 21%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 1%
Total 3,366
% Latino est. 77%
% Spanish-Surnamed 70%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 28%
% NH Black 0%
Total 2,678
% Latino est. 74%
% Spanish-Surnamed 67%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 31%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,798
% Latino est. 68%
% Spanish-Surnamed 63%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 0%
% NH White est. 36%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,125
age0-19 24%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 45%
english 36%
spanish 62%
asian-lang 1%
other lang 1%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 21%
hs-grad 57%
bachelor 10%
graduatedegree 5%
Child in Household child-under18 33%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 9%
income 25-50k 18%
income 50-75k 26%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 3%
single family 91%
multi-family 9%
rented 33%
owned 67%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,184
30 0.49%
73%
23%
1%
1%
3,286
64%
33%
0%
3%
3,155
61%
56%
1%
1%
41%
0%
2,582
59%
54%
1%
1%
43%
0%
1,783
52%
49%
1%
1%
49%
0%
6,103
37%
49%
14%
21%
43%
44%
55%
0%
1%
23%
52%
11%
10%
42%
60%
18%
14%
20%
36%
12%
81%
19%
36%
64%
3 6,012
-142
-2.31%
89%
9%
0%
1%
2,724
79%
18%
0%
2%
2,307
83%
77%
1%
1%
21%
0%
1,704
81%
75%
0%
1%
23%
0%
1,010
75%
69%
0%
1%
29%
0%
6,154
37%
53%
10%
31%
23%
30%
70%
0%
0%
32%
50%
6%
3%
48%
58%
26%
29%
16%
29%
0%
50%
50%
67%
33%
4 5,987
-167
-2.71%
80%
17%
0%
1%
3,021
73%
26%
0%
0%
2,975
68%
63%
0%
1%
34%
0%
2,349
65%
60%
0%
1%
37%
0%
1,641
57%
53%
0%
1%
44%
0%
5,861
30%
49%
20%
32%
36%
32%
68%
0%
0%
29%
47%
11%
6%
40%
56%
22%
21%
20%
33%
4%
90%
10%
42%
58%
5 6,360
206

3.35%
86%
12%
1%
1%
2,867
67%
30%
1%
2%
2,498
74%
68%
1%
1%
27%
1%
1,902
70%
64%
1%
1%
30%
1%
1,178
68%
64%
0%
1%
31%
1%
6,297
31%
50%
19%
32%
21%
39%
61%
0%
0%
31%
48%
6%
2%
37%
54%
18%
33%
19%
29%
1%
71%
29%
63%
37%
Total
30,772
373

6.06%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/10/2023 12:00 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
219
3 4
2 1
5 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
E
W
liot St
M
a
u
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St Walnut St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 112
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2026 (Juarez)
District 2 - 2024 (Sobel)
District 3 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 4 - 2024 (Cornejo)
District 5 - 2026 (Chavez)
Map layers
Plan 112
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 220
Map 112
District 1
Total Pop 6,044
Deviation from ideal -110
% Deviation -1.79%
% Hisp 83.5%
% NH White 14%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 1%
Total 3,547
% Hisp 70%
% NH White 27%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 2%
Total 2,728
% Latino est. 73%
% Spanish-Surnamed 67%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 31%
% NH Black 0%
Total 2,106
% Latino est. 70%
% Spanish-Surnamed 64%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 34%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,365
% Latino est. 62%
% Spanish-Surnamed 57%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 41%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,309
age0-19 27%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 20%
immigrants 24%
naturalized 30%
english 32%
spanish 67%
asian-lang 0%
other lang 1%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 27%
hs-grad 50%
bachelor 8%
graduatedegree 5%
Child in Household child-under18 40%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 58%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 30%
income 50-75k 19%
income 75-200k 36%
income 200k-plus 3%
single family 78%
multi-family 22%
rented 46%
owned 54%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,047
-107
-1.74%
69%
27%
0%
1%
3,461
61%
36%
0%
2%
3,541
61%
56%
0%
1%
41%
0%
2,932
59%
54%
0%
1%
43%
0%
2,100
53%
49%
0%
1%
49%
0%
5,700
33%
47%
20%
22%
47%
47%
52%
0%
1%
19%
55%
12%
11%
35%
57%
15%
13%
23%
38%
12%
91%
9%
29%
71%
3 6,432
278

4.52%
86%
11%
0%
1%
3,556
81%
17%
0%
1%
2,721
81%
73%
1%
1%
25%
0%
2,112
79%
72%
0%
1%
25%
0%
1,416
76%
70%
0%
1%
29%
0%
6,571
34%
54%
12%
27%
36%
38%
61%
0%
0%
25%
58%
8%
3%
45%
62%
20%
19%
20%
40%
1%
67%
33%
48%
52%
4 5,978
-176
-2.86%
81%
16%
0%
1%
2,936
74%
25%
0%
1%
2,918
68%
63%
0%
1%
33%
0%
2,306
65%
61%
0%
1%
37%
0%
1,565
57%
54%
0%
1%
44%
0%
5,868
31%
49%
19%
31%
36%
31%
68%
0%
0%
29%
49%
10%
5%
42%
57%
21%
22%
21%
33%
4%
89%
11%
43%
57%
5 6,271
117

1.90%
88%
9%
1%
1%
2,523
75%
21%
2%
2%
2,393
81%
74%
1%
1%
20%
2%
1,759
77%
71%
1%
1%
22%
2%
964
75%
70%
0%
1%
23%
2%
6,092
34%
51%
14%
36%
19%
33%
67%
0%
0%
36%
43%
6%
2%
37%
57%
24%
31%
20%
26%
0%
60%
40%
74%
26%
Total
30,772
454

7.38%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/10/2023 11:58 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
221
3 4
2 1
5 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
E
W
liot St
M
a
u
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St Walnut St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 113
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2026 (Juarez)
District 2 - 2024 (Cornejo)
District 3 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 4 - 2024 (Sobel)
District 5 - 2026 (Chavez)
Map layers
Plan 113
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 222
Map 113
District 1
Total Pop 6,286
Deviation from ideal 132
% Deviation 2.14%
% Hisp 80.4%
% NH White 16%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 1%
Total 4,129
% Hisp 71%
% NH White 26%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 2%
Total 3,328
% Latino est. 73%
% Spanish-Surnamed 66%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 32%
% NH Black 0%
Total 2,601
% Latino est. 70%
% Spanish-Surnamed 64%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 34%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,700
% Latino est. 64%
% Spanish-Surnamed 59%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 0%
% NH White est. 39%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,449
age0-19 25%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 22%
naturalized 39%
english 40%
spanish 58%
asian-lang 0%
other lang 1%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 22%
hs-grad 56%
bachelor 9%
graduatedegree 5%
Child in Household child-under18 34%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 9%
income 25-50k 24%
income 50-75k 22%
income 75-200k 42%
income 200k-plus 3%
single family 89%
multi-family 11%
rented 36%
owned 64%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,023
-131
-2.13%
62%
34%
1%
2%
3,740
53%
45%
0%
2%
3,962
54%
50%
1%
1%
48%
0%
3,391
53%
49%
1%
1%
49%
0%
2,577
47%
44%
1%
1%
54%
0%
5,503
30%
45%
25%
24%
45%
52%
47%
0%
1%
16%
51%
15%
13%
29%
52%
13%
11%
24%
39%
12%
96%
4%
21%
79%
3 5,891
-263
-4.27%
85%
12%
0%
1%
2,788
78%
19%
0%
2%
2,360
77%
70%
1%
1%
27%
0%
1,808
75%
69%
0%
1%
29%
0%
1,134
69%
64%
0%
1%
34%
0%
5,957
39%
50%
11%
28%
29%
38%
61%
0%
0%
27%
55%
8%
3%
48%
59%
26%
24%
19%
30%
1%
60%
40%
60%
40%
4 6,171
17 0.28%
89%
9%
0%
0%
2,690
86%
12%
1%
1%
2,517
81%
76%
0%
1%
19%
1%
1,845
79%
74%
0%
1%
21%
1%
1,182
73%
69%
0%
1%
26%
1%
6,174
36%
48%
16%
31%
33%
29%
71%
0%
0%
32%
51%
7%
2%
46%
59%
26%
26%
18%
28%
2%
79%
21%
56%
44%
5 6,401
247

4.01%
91%
6%
0%
1%
2,677
79%
17%
1%
2%
2,134
86%
79%
1%
1%
17%
1%
1,570
84%
77%
0%
1%
19%
1%
817
85%
79%
0%
1%
16%
1%
6,456
31%
59%
11%
33%
21%
23%
77%
0%
0%
38%
42%
5%
2%
43%
59%
20%
30%
19%
31%
0%
56%
44%
72%
28%
Total
30,772
510

8.29%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/10/2023 12:01 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.

Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
223
4 3
1 2
5 Santa Paula Cmtry
Harding Park
Charles M Teague Park
Las Piedras Park
Obregon Park
Jones Fld
Mill Park
Ebell Park
Veterans
Memorial Pk
E Santa Maria St
Padre Ln
Santa Paula Fwy
E Telegraph Rd
Lemonwood Dr
Monte Vista Dr
Encino
Pl
Sheppard Rd
View Dr
Acacia Rd
E Main St
Dartmouth Rd
Shell Rd
S Beckwith Rd
Cemetery Rd
Moultrie Pl
Peck Rd
Laurie Ln
Cherry Hill Rd
W Harvard Blvd
Todd Ln
Main St
W
Santa
Cruz
St
Cliff Dr
Terracina Dr
E Santa Clara St
E Virginia Ter
Ridgecrest Dr
S Peck Rd
Warren
Ave
Ernest Dr
Mckevett Rd
5th
St
Center Ln
Salas St
Santa Paula Fwy
Maple St
S
Olive
St
S
4th
St
Fern Oaks Dr
Teague Dr
Birch St
E Santa Paula St
Manzanita Dr
Guiberson St
S 12th
St
N
6th
St
N 14th
St
N
7th
St
N
Oak
St
Grant Line
St
Skyline
Dr
La Vuelta Pl
N
Palm Ave
Hawthorne St
Anacapa Ter
Say Rd
Fremontia St
Calpipe Rd
Bahia
Cir
Forest Dr
M
E Harvard Blvd
unger Dr
W
Main St
Dana Dr
N
Ojai Rd
S
Ojai St
Southwick St
Powerline
Sunset Ln
Plum Way
Woodland Dr
N 12th
St
N
Mill St
Marin Rd
Sycamore
St
N 13th
St
April Ln
S 11th St
N 10th St
S
Oak
St
Dike Rd
Cadway St
N
9th
St
Bradley St
W Santa Barbara St
Montclair Dr
S 8th
St
Cedar St
N
8th
St
S 10th St
S Calavo St
Lucada St
W Santa Paula St
Sheffield St
Telegraph Rd
March St
W
M
a
u
keford Ave
pu Ave
Vernon Pl
Limoneira Ln
Park
St
California St
S
Mill St
Railroad Ave
S Palm Ave
S 5th St
S
7th
St Walnut St
Staben
Ct
E Santa Barbara St
City of Santa Paula
Districting 2023
Map 114
Map Produced by NDC, 1/10/2023
Suggested Sequence:

District 1 - 2026 (Juarez)
District 2 - 2024 (Cornejo & Sobel)
District 3 - 2026 (Crosswhite)
District 4 - 2024 (vacant)
District 5 - 2026 (Chavez)
Map layers
Plan 114
Landmark Area
Pipeline Powerline
Railroad
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER Water Area 224
Map 114
District 1
Total Pop 6,229
Deviation from ideal 75
% Deviation 1.22%
% Hisp 80.8%
% NH White 16%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian-American 1%
Total 4,127
% Hisp 76%
% NH White 21%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 1%
Total 3,366
% Latino est. 77%
% Spanish-Surnamed 70%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 28%
% NH Black 0%
Total 2,678
% Latino est. 74%
% Spanish-Surnamed 67%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 31%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,798
% Latino est. 68%
% Spanish-Surnamed 63%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 0%
% NH White est. 36%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 6,125
age0-19 24%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 45%
english 36%
spanish 62%
asian-lang 1%
other lang 1%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 21%
hs-grad 57%
bachelor 10%
graduatedegree 5%
Child in Household child-under18 33%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 9%
income 25-50k 18%
income 50-75k 26%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 3%
single family 91%
multi-family 9%
rented 33%
owned 67%
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. 2 6,106
-48
-0.78%
63%
33%
1%
1%
3,540
53%
44%
0%
3%
3,849
53%
48%
1%
1%
49%
0%
3,237
51%
47%
1%
1%
51%
0%
2,396
44%
41%
1%
1%
57%
0%
5,744
33%
46%
21%
25%
40%
49%
49%
0%
1%
19%
50%
14%
13%
35%
55%
16%
12%
23%
36%
12%
92%
8%
28%
72%
3 6,093
-61
-0.99%
88%
10%
0%
1%
2,347
79%
18%
2%
2%
2,278
79%
73%
1%
1%
23%
1%
1,680
75%
69%
1%
1%
26%
1%
1,023
68%
64%
0%
1%
31%
1%
5,723
36%
51%
14%
35%
20%
32%
68%
0%
0%
35%
46%
6%
2%
41%
57%
25%
29%
21%
24%
1%
62%
38%
72%
28%
4 6,119
-35
-0.57%
90%
8%
0%
1%
2,923
81%
16%
0%
1%
2,053
85%
78%
1%
1%
20%
0%
1,548
84%
77%
0%
1%
21%
0%
1,011
80%
73%
0%
1%
25%
0%
6,468
36%
56%
9%
28%
28%
28%
72%
0%
1%
32%
50%
7%
3%
51%
60%
24%
26%
16%
34%
0%
50%
50%
61%
39%
5 6,225
71 1.15%
87%
11%
0%
1%
3,087
73%
25%
0%
1%
2,755
78%
72%
0%
1%
23%
0%
2,072
76%
70%
0%
1%
26%
0%
1,182
73%
69%
0%
1%
27%
0%
6,480
31%
48%
21%
29%
33%
36%
64%
0%
0%
30%
50%
8%
3%
40%
55%
19%
31%
15%
32%
2%
86%
14%
48%
52%
Total
30,772
136

2.21%
82%
15%
0%
1%
16,024
72%
25%
0%
2%
14,301
72%
66%
1%
1%
31%
0%
11,215
69%
63%
1%
1%
34%
0%
7,410
63%
58%
0%
1%
39%
0%
30,540
32%
51%
17%
28%
32%
36%
63%
0%
1%
27%
51%
9%
5%
40%
58%
18%
23%
20%
34%
4%
77%
23%
48%
52%
01/10/2023 12:27 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
225
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Jonathan Royas, Management Analyst
Subject: CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 7437 IN SUPPORT OF A

COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION CENTER IN SANTA PAULA
Date: January 18, 2023
Agenda Item: 12.A

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 7437 in support of the Ventura County Community College District acquisition of property to construct a Community College Education Center in Santa Paula.

Presented by: Jonathan Royas
BACKGROUND:

In 2002, the voters of Ventura County passed Measure S. Measure S authorized the Board of Trustees of the Ventura County Community College District (VCCCD) to issue bonds totaling $356.3 million for repairs and construction of facilities on the three community college campuses and a Camarillo property. As noted in attached Exhibit A, VCCCD’s Ventura College Major Initiative Proposal presented on October 20, 20222 to the Ventura County College Academic Senate, “residents of the Santa Clara River Valley (SCRV) were given assurances that the proceeds from the bond would be used to build the “Santa Clara Valley Advanced Technology Education Center including classrooms, computer labs, library, and childcare center.”
In 2003, the VCCCD Board of Trustees approved a motion to submit a preliminary notice of interest to the State to establish a permanent educational center in the City of Santa Paula.

This notice was sent to the State by Chancellor Studt on December 10, 2003. The district then spent a considerable amount of time working with landowners in the area to acquire a land donation for the educational center. However, during this period, construction costs began rapidly increasing. As a result, the approved Measure S funds would not be sufficient to fund the proposed educational center and the many other planned district construction projects. In 2005-2006, a decision was made to prioritize Measure S funds for other projects, which meant that the educational center would not be built.

This decision resulted in both disillusionment and anger in the SCRV community and community frustration reached a boiling point when the City of Santa Paula published Exhibit B, a 2006 report titled, “Broken Promise. The Story of Measure S and the Failure to Construct 226
the New Santa Clara Valley Advanced Technology Education Center.” Between 2006 and the present, VCCCD continued with sustained planning efforts to improve educational access and to identify options to purchase land/real estate in the SCRV. For example, page 60 of the 2009 Ventura College Educational Master Plan states the college will:
“Explore opportunities for acquiring new or additional space for the East Campus to accommodate growing programs and services. Possible sites include:

Space in the planned Limoneira mixed-use development in Santa Paula.

Vacant space adjacent to the existing facilities at Dean Drive (approximately 1,200 square feet).

Two vacant spaces located on Harvard Drive (4,400 square feet and 2,314 square feet respectively).

Smaller-scale “storefront” programs in Fillmore and Piru.

In 2011, the VCCCD opened its current site, the Ventura College East Campus (East Campus), at 957 Faulkner Road in Santa Paula. This site occupies storefront space in a strip mall. It consists of 6 lecture classrooms and 1 recently built science lab (2000 additional sq. feet). The classes range in size from 22 to 47 seats, as well as a small computer lab/library, and very limited student services. The VCCCD currently leases this space for $108,480 per year.

While this site is an improvement over previous SCRV locations, it has a number of shortcomings. Chief among those is the lack of space to offer comprehensive instruction. Until fall 2022, the current space only allowed for lecture-based classes, and did not contain laboratory facilities. A laboratory classroom was recently added to the site, but it can only accommodate 28 students. Furthermore, until recently, the site suffered from very unpredictable internet service. Although VCCCD recently paid for an internet upgrade at the site, it is still not an ideal long-term solution due to the lack of facility capacity.

Additionally, there are other challenges present at the East Campus such as:

The site does not have the space to accommodate a full set of student and academic support services.

There is no dedicated Admissions and Records Office. Rather, a student services assistant is available to assist students with registration.

There is only space for one full-time counselor to be on site from Monday through Thursday.

Financial aid staff are on site twice a month and have to set up in a classroom. This is not ideal, given that students need a private space to discuss confidential issues with financial aid staff.

There is limited tutoring offered in the library/learning resource center.

A basic needs food pantry is also available to students on a very limited basis.

In 2012, an off-campus program review found that students and faculty were displeased with a 227
number of aspects of the site and as a result. Then in 2014, the off-campus program review recommended the creation of an “East Area One Educational Task Force” that was put into place to strategize and develop recommendations for a new campus site that was projected for fall 2018. This site did not materialize for a number of reasons.

In 2017, a VCCCD Facilities Master Plan update noted that VCCCD would engage the business and civic leadership as well as other partners in Santa Paula to develop a costsharing strategy for a new college facility in the Santa Clara River Valley.

In 2019, the Santa Clara Valley Advisory Committee was established. This group includes VCCCD leadership, the City Manager, as well as SCRV community leaders, and routinely convenes 2-3 times a year. The community and educational partners within this group are major proponents of education and the expansion of educational opportunities for their community.

Ventura College East Campus Current Status
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the East Campus offered between 45 and 65 classes a year.

In 2020-21, the pandemic hit the community particularly hard, and East Campus operations were almost completely halted. In 2021-2022, classes have begun to be added back to the schedule, as depicted below.

VC East Campus In-Person Enrollment and Full-Time Enrolled Students (FTES) Academic Year Classes Enrollment FTES
2016-2017 45 1,107 130.7
2017-2018 44 1,172 136.2
2018-2019 55 1,357 152.3
2019-2020 64 1,386 155.4
2020-2021* 2 46 10.4
2021-2022* 30 528 50.4
2022-2023 (projected) 51 1,250 151.7
* East Campus location was shutdown for an extended period due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Due to the nature of the facilities at the site, there is very limited capacity for enrollment growth and the expansion of student support services. The site is an improvement over previous VCCCD locations in the SCRV, but as community leaders have shared with the district numerous times, it cannot function as the true educational center that the community needs and desires. Ventura College has recently entered into a partnership with Ohana Pet Hospital to begin a new Registered Veterinary Technician program that is based at the East Campus.

In addition, the East Campus has done an extensive overhaul to its ESL program to provide more free, NonCredit ESL classes to the SCRV area. Both of these programs are seeing a high level of interest from SCRV residents. However, due to the nature of the current site, the East Campus will not be able to expand to meet the anticipated needs of these programs.

VCCCD Major Initiative Proposal
Early last year, Kim Hoffmans, Ventura Community College President, met with the City Manager's Office to explore land opportunities for an expanded campus in Santa Paula. From those discussion, an introduction was made with Santa Paula-based citrus grower Limoneira, 228
owners of vacant land known as East Area 1. Through their analysis, VCCCD officials have now identified and negotiated a potential land purchase from Limoneira for a satellite campus.

The plan still needs approval from the district board, but college officials and Limoneira executives agree this is the closest in the past 20 years since the passage of Measure S the community has been to finding the SCRV a permanent, full-service college campus to replace the leased storefront that is currently home to Ventura College East Campus.

The property VCCCD is proposing for the satellite campus is just south of Highway 126, at the east end of Santa Paula (Exhibit D). It is across the freeway from the new Harvest at Limoneira housing development, and adjacent to property Limoneira plans to sell to a developer to build a new county hospital to replace the current Santa Paula Hospital.

This Limoneira property is 27 acres and the college district would need 8 to 10 acres for the new satellite campus according to the most recent district report on the plan presented in October 2022 to the Ventura College Academic Senate. During the October meeting the recommendation was for the Ventura County Community College District to set aside $8 million from its reserves to buy the property and up to $20 million in state funding to build the campus. The district’s proposal calls for a multi-story building of up to 110,000 square feet — nearly 10 times the size of the storefront the district now leases in Santa Paula.

If the district were to buy the Limoneira property, it will be at least five years before anything is built, as there is currently a freeze on state funding for new community college construction, and with the state projecting multibillion-dollar deficits in the coming fiscal year, it is unclear when that freeze would be lifted.

Unfortunately, on October 20, 2022, the expansion site proposal failed its first public test, an advisory vote by the Ventura College Academic Senate. The faculty members voted 13-2, with three abstentions, against a motion to support the plan for a new campus. According to minutes from Academic Senate meetings, the faculty members’ concerns included uncertainty about board support, whether there would be enough enrollment to support the campus, and the price of the Limoneira land.

ANALYSIS:

On December 7, 2022, Councilmember Chavez requested Council consider a resolution of support for a Community College Education Center in Santa Paula, seconded by Councilmember Juarez. While the City does not directly have any purview over whether or not VCCCD decides to add an additional campus location in Santa Paula, one of Council’s objectives in the 2021-2023 Strategic Plan, Section F. Community Vitality, Objective #12 is to actively engage with VCCCD to provide and improve educational opportunities for our community while maintaining and growing the programs at the current Ventura College East campus.

The current East Campus offers classes in a few majors, but a full-service satellite campus in Santa Paula would allow many more students in Santa Paula, Fillmore, and the surrounding areas to complete their community college degrees without having to commute to the main Ventura College campus — a major obstacle for students who do not have cars. While an impressive number of Santa Paula students attend the main campus, many do so at considerable personal sacrifice. There is bus service available from Santa Paula with one transfer, but travel time means students from the Valley as a whole are at a distinct 229
disadvantage when compared to other students. To improve access to higher education for SCRV residents, VCCCD has spent decades discussing and evaluating different options. The district has leased space at different locations in Fillmore and Santa Paula since the 1980's, however, these locations have been small, and have not allowed for comprehensive educational programming.

Additionally, the new campus would bring educational opportunities to students in an area that has been historically underserved by the higher education system. Santa Paula’s population is more than 80% Latino and Fillmore’s is more than 70%. Combined, the two cities also have among the lowest median household incomes in Ventura County. As a result, families are less able to be completely self-reliant and must compromise by living in overcrowded housing, going without medical care, and forgoing higher education, among other sacrifices, all of which is affirmed from data from the 2020 Census.

For these reasons, former Mayor Crosswhite sent a letter of support (Exhibit C) on October 18, 2022, ahead of the October 20, 2022 meeting, which was received by Dan Clark, Ventura College Academic Senate President. Unfortunately, as shared earlier in this report, the expansion site proposal failed during an advisory vote by the Ventura College Academic Senate.

Tonight, Council is asked to consider affirming, through Resolution No. 7437, support for the Ventura County Community College District property acquisition and campus expansion efforts and to designate Mayor Sobel or another member of the Council to represent the City's commitment at upcoming VCCCD meetings or hearings.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Approval of this item moves the City closer to completing City Council's two-year Strategic Plan, Section F. Community Vitality, Objective #12: To actively engage with VCCCD to provide and improve educational opportunities for our community while maintaining and growing the programs at the current Ventura College East Campus by supporting the purchase of available land that would allow the building of a new campus.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

At this time, approval of this item has no fiscal impact to the City. However, future City revenues could be impacted in a manner staff has not quantified at this time as the revenue sources for the planned 25 acres of commercial property could change to 17 acres for hospital/school use and 8 acres for retail use which will result in a need to update revenue and sales tax projections.

OPTIONS:

As an alternative to Staff's recommendation, the City Council has the following options:

1. Amend Resolution No. 7437 and/or provide further direction to staff.

2. Do not approve Resolution No. 7437.

ATTACHMENTS:
230
Resolution Number 7437
EXHIBIT A - VCCCD's Major Initiative Proposal .pdf
EXHIBIT B - Broken Promise 2002-2006.pdf
EXHIBIT C - Letter to VCCCD.pdf
EXHIBIT D - Maps.pdf
231
RESOLUTION NO. 7437

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

PAULA IN SUPPORT OF A COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION

CENTER IN SANTA PAULA
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares:

A. The Santa Clara River Valley (SCRV) is a vibrant agricultural region adjacent to the Santa Clara River. It is home to approximately 50,000 residents and includes the communities of Santa Paula, Fillmore, and Piru.

B. The demographics of the SCRV indicate that the area could benefit greatly from increased access to higher education. The vast majority of residents come from historically underserved groups. Further, educational attainment and median household income are both lower in this area than in Ventura County, as a whole.

C. SCRV residents make up a sizeable proportion of the Ventura County Community College District (“District”) student population. In Fall 2021, 1,726 credit students came from the SCRV. Further Santa Paula Union High School and Fillmore Senior High are among the District’s top 20 feeder schools.

D. SCRV residents who wish to improve their lives through higher education have to spend a considerable amount of time driving or taking public transportation to the main District campus, or they have to take classes online.

E. In 2002, voters passed the District $356-million general obligation bond, known as “Measure S”. Residents of the Santa Clara River Valley were given assurances that the proceeds from the bond would be used to build the “Santa Clara Valley Advanced Technology Education Center including classrooms, computer labs, library, and childcare center.” Santa Paula residents voted overwhelmingly in favor of Measure S to build this Community College Education Center. For many in the community, the bond was going to fulfill a long-held dream, yet never materialized.

F. Santa Paula has had a satellite of the main District campus for over 30 years (the “East Campus”), yet during recessions and State budget crises, the East Campus suffered in order to maintain the level of service of the main campus. While an impressive number of Santa Paula students attend the main campus, many do so at a considerable personal sacrifice, including overcrowded housing, going without medical care, and forgoing higher education, among others.

G. The East Campus has a number of shortcomings, chief among them is a lack of space to offer comprehensive instruction and provide adequate support services to students.

H. Former Mayor Crosswhite sent a letter on October 18, 2022, ahead of an October 20, 2022 Ventura College Academic Senate (VCAS) meeting in support of the District acquiring property in Santa Paula to build an additional campus. 232
I. Santa Paula’s Two-Year Strategic Plan, Objective 12 of Goal F (Community Vitality), provides that the City will actively engage with the District to provide and improve education opportunities in our community while maintaining and growing the programs at the current East Campus.

J. This resolution serves to reaffirm the City of Santa Paula’s commitment to improving the lives of its residents and their families by promoting measures that combat poverty and create pathways for economic opportunities for all.

K. Building a Community College Education Center in Santa Paula provides local accessibility and equity for our students in their pursuit of higher education and an improved quality of life.

L. Jobs and building a sustainable economy drive economic development opportunities for working-class people to thrive.

M. Santa Paula and our region’s growth require a forward-thinking approach to job creation by investing in workforce training programs that include a focus on skilled trades and expanding the community college footprint.

N. To build the future economic prosperity of the Santa Clara Valley Region, a long overdue promise of building a Community College Education Center in Santa Paula must become a reality.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Santa Paula, consistent with its letter to the VCAS and with Objective F.12 of the City’s Strategic Plan, once again officially states its support of the Community College Education Center in Santa Paula and urges the District to move forward with the land acquisition required to make this long overdue promise a reality.

SECTION 3. Through advocacy and by working alongside a coalition of community stakeholders, the City Council is committed to promoting the value of higher education and skilled training programs that create jobs of the 21st Century. These efforts will not only meet the needs of our residents but serve as a hub for new emerging industries that are tied to our rich agricultural history and landscape.

SECTION 4. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 18th day of January, 2023. ________________________
Andy Sobel, Mayor
City of Santa Paula, California
233
ATTEST:
_________________
Julie Latshaw
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________
Monica Castillo
Interim City Attorney
234

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss

CITY OF SANTA PAULA )
I, Julie Latshaw, City Clerk of the City of Santa Paula, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 7437 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Paula at a regular meeting thereof held on January __, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City this __ day of January, 2023.
_________________
Julie Latshaw
City Clerk
235

EXHIBIT A -
Ventura County
Community College
District
Major Initiative Proposal
236
VC Major Initiative Proposal 1 Revised 09/23/2022

VENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Property Acquisition in the Santa Clara River Valley
Ventura College Major Initiative Proposal
To Benefit Future Students of the Ventura County Community College District Background:

The Santa Clara River Valley (SCRV) is a vibrant agricultural region adjacent to the Santa Clara River. It is home to approximately 50,000 residents, and includes the communities of Santa Paula, Fillmore, and Piru.

The demographics of the SCRV indicate that the area could benefit greatly from increased access to higher education. The vast majority of residents come from historically underserved groups. Further, educational attainment and median household income are both lower in this area than in Ventura County, as a whole.
237
VC Major Initiative Proposal 2 Revised 09/23/2022
*Source: 2020 U.S. Census
*Source: 2020 U.S. Census – American Community Survey
*Source: 2020 U.S. Census – American Community Survey
SCRV residents make up a sizable proportion of the VCCCD student population. In fall 2021, 1,726 credit students came from the SCRV. Further, Santa Paula Union High School and Fillmore Senior High are among the district’s top 20 feeder schools.

0.9% 0.3%

80.5%

0.3% 1.5%

16.1%

7.7%

1.6%

43.3%

0.2% 3.9%

42.8%
Asian/PI Black Hispanic Native Amer Two or More White
Resident Ethnicity
SCRV
Ventura County

26.4% 25.7%

47.9%

13.9%

20.8%

65.3%
Less than HS graduate HS graduate Attended or graduated college Highest Educational Attainment - Adults 18 and Older
SCRV
Ventura County
$74,211
$59,000 $62,241
$89,295
Fillmore Piru Santa Paula Ventura County
Median Household Income
238
VC Major Initiative Proposal 3 Revised 09/23/2022
Fall 2021 VCCCD Credit Students by
City of Residence
City Students
Oxnard 7,061
Simi Valley 3,392
Ventura 3,333
Camarillo 2,035
Thousand Oaks 1,841
Moorpark 1,186
Santa Paula 1,046
Newbury Park 927
Fillmore 632
Port Hueneme 622
Piru 48
Fall 2021 VCCCD Credit Students by
High School
High School Students
Pacifica High School, Oxnard 1,430
Oxnard High 1,348
Channel Islands High 1,219
Camarillo (Adolfo) High 965
Rio Mesa High 925
Newbury Park High 917
Simi Valley High 892
Hueneme High 870
Buena High 866
Thousand Oaks High 861
Moorpark High School 836
Royal High 815
Ventura High 806
Santa Paula Union High 797
Westlake High 698
Out of country high school 625
Out of state high school 516
Santa Susana HS 500
Fillmore Senior High 497
Agoura High 462
Foothill Tech High School 421
239
VC Major Initiative Proposal 4 Revised 09/23/2022
Fall 2021 Credit Students by City of Residence and College City
Moorpark
College
Oxnard
College
Ventura
College VCCCD*
College of
the Canyons
Fillmore 161 67 452 632 71
Piru 11 6 35 48 37
Santa Paula 123 133 893 1,046 8
Total 295 206 1,380 1,726 116
*Some students took classes at multiple VCCCD colleges. Thus, the sum of the colleges does not add up exactly to the VCCCD total.

College of the Canyons data obtained from COC Fall Student Profile Estimated Number of SCRV High School Graduates who Enrolled at VC within 1 year 2019-2020 Graduating Class 2020-2021 Graduating Class
High School Graduates
Enrolled at VC
within 1 Year % Graduates
Enrolled at VC
within 1 Year %
Santa Paula High School 317 93 29.3% 340 70 20.6%
Fillmore High School 230 66 28.7% 243 69 28.4%
Total 547 159 29.1% 583 139 23.8%
*Graduates = number of total graduates as reported by the CA Dept of Education *Enrolled at VC within 1 year = number of first-time students who indicated that they graduated from an SCRV high school in a given year
*Graduates and enrolled students come from two separate data systems, and thus the percentages should be viewed as estimates, as opposed to exact values.

If SCRV residents want to improve their lives through higher education, they have to spend a considerable amount of time driving or taking public transportation to a VCCCD campus, or they have to take online classes. To improve this community’s access to higher education, the VCCCD has spent decades discussing and evaluating different options. The district has leased space at different locations in Fillmore and Santa Paula since at least 1980. However, these locations have been small, and haven’t allowed for comprehensive educational programming.

In 2002, voters passed the VCCCD’s $356M general obligation bond, known as “Measure S”. Residents of the SCRV were given assurances that the proceeds from the bond would be used to build the “Santa Clara Valley Advanced Technology Education Center including classrooms, computer labs, library, and childcare center.” Santa Paula residents voted overwhelmingly in favor of Measure S. For many in the area, the bond was going to fulfill a long-held dream.

In 2003, the VCCCD Board of Trustees approved a motion to submit a preliminary notice of interest to the state to establish a permanent educational center in the city of Santa Paula. This notice was sent to the state by Chancellor Studt on December 10, 2003. The district then spent a considerable amount of 240
VC Major Initiative Proposal 5 Revised 09/23/2022
time working with landowners in the area to acquire a land donation for the educational center.

However, during this period, construction costs began rapidly increasing. As a result, the approved Measure S funds would not be sufficient to fund the proposed educational center and the many other planned district construction projects. In 2005-2006, a decision was made to prioritize Measure S funds for other projects, which meant that the educational center would not be built.

Not surprisingly, this decision resulted in both disillusionment and anger in the SCRV community. This frustration reached a boiling point when the City of Santa Paula published a 2006 report titled “Broken Promise. The Story of Measure S and the Failure to Construct the New Santa Clara Valley Advanced Technology Education Center.” This report strongly condemned the district, and has had a lasting impact in the area.

Between 2006 and the present, Ventura College continued with sustained planning efforts to improve educational access and to identify options to purchase land/real estate in the SCRV. For example, page 60 of the 2009 Ventura College Educational Master Plan states that the college will:
“Explore opportunities for acquiring new or additional space for the East Campus to accommodate growing programs and services. Possible sites include:
• Space in the planned Limoneira mixed-use development in Santa Paula. • Vacant space adjacent to the existing facilities at Dean Drive (approximately 1,200 square feet).
• Two vacant spaces located on Harvard Drive (4,400 square feet and 2,314 square feet respectively).
• Smaller-scale “storefront” programs in Fillmore and Piru.” In 2011, the district opened its current site, the Ventura College East Campus, at 957 Faulkner Road in Santa Paula. This site occupies storefront space in a strip mall. It consists of 6 lecture classrooms and 1 recently built science lab (2000 additional sq. feet). The classes range in size from 22 to 47 seats, as well as a small computer lab/library, and very limited student services. The district currently leases this space for $108,480 per year.

While this site is an improvement over previous SCRV locations, it has a number of shortcomings. Chief among those is the lack of space to offer comprehensive instruction. Until fall 2022, the current space only allowed for lecture-based classes, and did not contain laboratory facilities. A laboratory classroom was recently added to the site, but it can only accommodate 28 students. Further, until recently, the site suffered from very unpredictable internet service. The VCCCD recently paid for an internet upgrade at the site, but it is still not an ideal long-term solution to the lack of facility capacity.

The site also does not have the space to accommodate a full set of student and academic support services. There is no dedicated Admissions and Records Office. Rather, a student services assistant is available to assist students with registration. There is only space for one full-time counselor to be on site from Monday through Thursday. Financial aid staff are on site twice a month and have to set up in a classroom. This is not ideal, given that students need a private space to discuss confidential issues with financial aid staff. There is limited tutoring offered in the library/learning resource center. A basic needs food pantry is also available to students on a very limited basis. 241
VC Major Initiative Proposal 6 Revised 09/23/2022
Ventura College East Campus Current Location
Ventura College East Campus
242
VC Major Initiative Proposal 7 Revised 09/23/2022
Since moving to the current site, Ventura College has continued exploring additional options. The 2012 off-campus program review included SUO assessment results that found that students and faculty were displeased with a number of aspects of the site. The 2014 off-campus program review described the creation of an “East Area One Educational Task Force” that was put into place to strategize and develop recommendations for a new campus site that was projected for fall 2018. This site did not materialize for a number of reasons.

The 2017 Facilities Master Plan update noted that VC would “engage the business and civic leadership as well as other partners in Santa Paula to develop a cost-sharing strategy for a new college facility in the Santa Clara River Valley.” In 2019, the Santa Clara Valley Advisory Committee was established. This group includes Ventura College leadership, as well as SCRV community leaders. The group meets regularly to discuss and develop plans for improving SCRV access to higher education.

Most recently, the 2022 Facilities Master Plan discussed space needs to increase the East Campus to 500, and 1,000 FTES. It also included campus survey results that noted the need for increased class space and course offerings at the East Campus.

The Ventura College East Campus Advisory Committee routinely convenes 2-3 times a year. The community and educational partners within this group are major proponents of education and the expansion of educational opportunities for their community.

Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the VCCCD offered between 45 and 65 classes a year at this location. In 2020-21, the pandemic hit this community particularly hard, and East Campus operations were almost completely halted. In 2021-2022, classes have begun to be added back to the schedule.

VC East Campus In-Person Enrollment and FTES
Academic Year Classes Enrollment FTES
2016-2017 45 1,107 130.7
2017-2018 44 1,172 136.2
2018-2019 55 1,357 152.3
2019-2020 64 1,386 155.4
2020-2021* 2 46 10.4
2021-2022* 30 528 50.4
2022-2023 (projected) 51 1,250 151.7
* East Campus location was shutdown for an extended period due to Covid Current Limitations to Growth
Due to the nature of the facilities at the site, there is very limited capacity for enrollment growth and the expansion of student support services. The site is an improvement over previous VCCCD locations in the SCRV, but as community leaders have shared with the district numerous times, it cannot function as the true educational center that the community needs and desires. Ventura College has recently 243
VC Major Initiative Proposal 8 Revised 09/23/2022
entered into a partnership with Ohana Pet Hospital to begin a new Registered Veterinary Technician program that is based at the East Campus. In addition, the VC has done an extensive overhaul to its ESL program to provide more free, NonCredit ESL classes to the SCRV area. Both of these programs are seeing a high level of interest from SCRV residents. However, due to the nature of the current site, we will not be able to expand them to their true potential.

Current Situation and Opportunities:

Despite past history, community leaders, civic groups and VCCCD leadership all continue in a shared belief that the dream of an educational center can be – albeit belatedly - realized. As populations and future growth projections in the Fillmore/Santa Paula area indicate, the need for enhanced highereducation services, and partnerships with local school districts, have become increasingly apparent.

As part of the Limoneira Corporation’s Harvest development in east Santa Paula, an approximate 8-10 acre parcel was set aside for educational use. Originally, the Santa Paula Unified School District did not have plans for the property. After completing a strategic plan for the district, they decided to build a new middle school on the site. As such, this is no longer an option for a future VC East Campus location.

With no other obvious option in Santa Paula, the College President met with city managers and the CEO of Limoneira to discuss possibilities. Limoneira does own additional viable land strategically located on the south-east side of Santa Paula near the city of Fillmore. Most of this land is slated for the building of a new hospital, townhome/apartments, and medical offices. However, there is a remaining 20-acre site that Limoneira is interested in selling to the VCCCD for a future educational center. This is the only remaining land for purchase in Santa Paula. Utilities and other infrastructure essentials are already in place at this location. It is not available for sale to the general public, and is being offered to the VCCCD by Limoniera due to mission alignment, and their desire to support higher education in the community.

Location of Proposed Educational Center Site
Ventura
College
VC East
Campus
Proposed
Educational
Center
244
VC Major Initiative Proposal 9 Revised 09/23/2022
Aerial Map of Proposed Educational Center Site
Educational Center Function and Scope:

As noted above, a new comprehensive hospital/medical center has been approved for construction and is expected to be completed near this site sometime within the next decade. This facility could present an excellent opportunity for VCCCD students to leverage their learning in high-need health careers.

Through participatory governance planning, as part of academic senate’s (10+1) and classified senate (9+1), decision related to programs and services to be offered at a new and expanded east campus site will occur. In addition, partnerships with local K-12 school districts for dual enrollment could be greatly expanded, as well as space for career education, early learning and childcare, and four-year baccalaureate degree programs. The location of the land (see aerial map) is also easily accessible to the majority of SCRV residents. It is just off the main freeway in the area (i.e. the 126 freeway), and is located at the east end of Santa Paula (30,335 population) near the city limits of Fillmore (15,610 population).

Based on the recently completed VC Facilities Master Plan, 8-10 acres of land (half of the available acres) with a multistory building should be more than sufficient to support the enrollment capacity needs of a center of around 106,842-110,000 GSF.

Funding:

The State of California will provide funding of up to $20M for the construction phase of a Community College Educational Center. However, there are currently two caveats:
245
VC Major Initiative Proposal 10 Revised 09/23/2022

1. Funding is not provided for the purchase of the property to be built upon; requiring the District or College to acquire the land beforehand.

2. There is currently a moratorium on construction funding and on obtaining center status from the State; creating uncertainty as to when this restriction will be lifted.

Fortunately, the VCCCD is in position, based upon its current reserve balance, to satisfy the land purchase component. Although it is important to recognize that reserves – as opposed to a surplus or other windfall source of revenue - are finite resources intended to address economic uncertainties and not intended for recurring costs, the district currently possesses a reserve balance capable of making an investment of this type without significant risk to its solvency. As a result, the reserve balance would be an appropriate source to fund this project without encroachment upon ongoing operational funds or other designated fiscal obligations.

Another option for funding for construction would be to go out for another college bond measure. The last bond was Measure “S” in 2002. All of the colleges could benefit from this action. In order for VCCCD to be successful in voter approval of a bond, it is imperative that we have the support of the Santa Clara River Valley (SCRV). SCRV constituency groups are passionate, engaged, and very vocal about improving access to higher education in their area. Any position from these groups would most likely be a barrier to a successful bond measure vote.

Recommendation:

That the VCCCD set aside the sum of eight-million dollars ($8,000,000) from district reserves to be placed in a separate and dedicated fund for the acquisition of property and associated costs in the Santa Clara River Valley for the purpose of constructing a multi-use Educational Center for the future benefit of the students and communities in this area. The state allocation to the district is increasing in 2022- 2023, and there are additional one-time funds being provided to the district that will assist in replenishing the district reserves. The VCCCD has a history of purchasing land for additional sites (i.e. for Oxnard College, Moorpark College, and the Camarillo airport location).

The district would see a number of benefits from this purchase, including the following:
• Land, especially in Ventura County, is a prudent investment under almost any circumstances. In particular in this case as there is no other land for sale in Santa Paula. • Land dedicated for public education promotes opportunity, progress and the public good. • Prior purchase of land for an Educational Center will allow VCCCD to be well positioned for State provided construction funding when available.
• The property can be utilized for a variety of educational purposes, programs and partnerships. • The purchase of land as a one-time expenditure is an appropriate use of VCCCD reserves. • The reservation of funding for the purchase of an appropriate property will constitute a down payment on a long-anticipated dream for the students and communities of the SCRV. • The revenue from an Educational Center site will benefit the district for decades to come.

In sum, the SCRV is an area that could greatly benefit from expanded access to higher education. It is home to 50,000 people. Over 80% of residents are from underrepresented groups. Less than half of adults over the age of 18 have attended college. The median household income in this region is substantially lower than that of Ventura County, as a whole. In 2002, the VCCCD made a promise to 246
VC Major Initiative Proposal 11 Revised 09/23/2022
SCRV residents and voters that an Educational Center would be built with Measure S funds. This promise was unfulfilled, and has resulted in a decades-long fracture between SCRV residents and the VCCCD. The district and Ventura College has attempted to meet the educational needs of the SCRV at small leased sites, but these sites don’t allow for the growth of new programs or student services. This land purchase is an opportunity to take a meaningful step towards repairing the broken promise. 247

EXHIBIT B -
2006
City of Santa Paula
Report
248

BROKEN PROMISE
The Story of Measure S and the
Failure to Construct the New Santa Clara Valley
Advanced Technology Education Center
(aka Santa Paula Ventura College East Campus Center)
2001-2006
April 2006
249
2 The City of Santa Paula, through two different requests under the California Public Records Act and other public documents it has obtained, has compiled the story of what we think really happened after the Ventura County Community College District (VCCCD) went to the voters of Ventura County and received their support of a $356 million bond “Measure S” in March 2002. Included in the list of projects for the bond was a new “Santa Clara Valley Advanced Technology Education Center.” While no specific dollar amount for this project is listed on the bond initiative, the College District internally budgeted $24.61 million for the project.

Now over four years later, the project has not been constructed and the VCCCD Board of Trustees is considering defunding the project and using the funds for other purposes.

How and why is this happening?
The City and the voters of Ventura County may never really know for sure.

However, based on the documents in this report (which are cited here by their Attachment number), here are our best guesses.

1. Political Will of the District Changed
When Measure S was first discussed, the Board and District staff held up the construction of a new facility in the Santa Clara Valley as a top priority (Attachment 4). After Measure S passed, the District worked diligently to move the project forward (Attachments 10A, 10D, 10E, 13, 13A). However when Ventura College President Larry Calderon left to take a similar job in Florida in early 2004, the interest of the District in the project clearly changed. That position was reinforced when Trustee Bob Gonzales left the Board in late 2004. There is no record of any pro-active actions by the District to move the project forward since 2004. All activity to do so has rested with the City of Santa Paula and the Santa Paula community.

2. No Land/How Much Land Really Needed?
Measure S provided no land for a new facility in the Santa Clara Valley. While Calderon had lined up a potential donor for six acres of land just after Measure S was approved (Attachment 10B), that fell through (Attachment 10C) in late 2002. The District attempted to identify other parcels at a community meeting in April, 2003 (Attachment 10F). The parcels reviewed ranged in size from under an acre to 405 acres. A December, 2002 email from JCM (the District’s project management consultant) to Calderon talked about the various acreages that could be used (Attachment 10). However, the District has never held another meeting in the three years since to look for alternate sites nor is there any information in the record regarding additional work to identify land. The City of Santa Paula started 250
3 negotiating with the Limoneira Company for land for the facility absent any action from the District. The District officially changed its position for needing less than 10 acres to needing 40 acres or more at a November 13, 2004 public meeting in Santa Paula. However the explanation for needing this much acreage is contradicted in the December, 2002 email from JCM (Attachment 10).

3. Vision of the Facility Changed (or Did It?)
The vision and plan for the facility were articulated several times through 2001 as the bond program was developed and then into 2002 and 2003 (Attachments 1, 2, 2A, 4, 5, 10A, 10D. 10E). Shortly after the bond passed, it seems to have become clear to the District that any new facility would need to have “Center” status. The District made the first application for such status in December, 2003 (Attachments 16 and 17). In this application letter, the District expected to submit the next step of the application process a “Letter of Intent” by mid calendar year 2004. That Letter has not yet been submitted. Not much has been discussed about the “vision” of the facility until April, 2006 when the current Ventura College President, Robin Calote, called on the community to work with her on an “educational masterplan” for the new facility (Attachment 39). It is unclear why the vision and masterplans developed between 2001 and 2003 are now insufficient for use.

4. Budget Problems
It became clear in late 2004 (Attachment 22A) that the District would not have enough money to complete all its Measure S projects.

Reasons for this vary and again, the voters of Ventura County may never know all the reasons why. One project that seemed to be in particular difficulty was the construction of a regional fire, sheriff and police education and training academy. (Attachment 21 and 35).

While the record shows this was the first project initiated after the bond passed in October, 2002 (Attachment 9), three and a half years later it is still not complete. Interestingly, Calote’s April email indicates that along with the proposed defunding of the East Campus facility that $8 million would be transferred to public safety training facility. This is troublesome because of the general understanding that funds for projects could not be transferred between Colleges, with the public safety facility being allocated a separate line item in the bond (Attachment 6 and 26). This however became a non-issue in late 2005 when the District’s Bond Counsel opined that it was now acceptable to move funds in this way (Attachment 38) just at the time the District began considering the need to transfer funds. However even with the reprogramming of funds detailed in Attachment 39, there remains $12 million unallocated for Ventura College projects. In Calote’s email there is no explanation why the entire East Campus facility budget is being defunded.
251
4 5. Need 500 FTES to Build Facility
When Measure S was proposed and campaigned for, there was no stipulation of enrollment needs to actually construct the new East Campus facility. The first discussion of needing 500 FTES (or Full Time Equivalent Students) in our review came in a December, 2002 email from JCM to Calderon (Attachment 10). However, JCM talks of exceptions to this 500 FTES rule “if it can be demonstrated that the center is meeting a very special need, that the current facilities are hopelessly inadequate to meet the need, if future growth is clearly in evidence that will bring the center to at least 500 FTES threshold, or if there are economic efficiencies involved such as the donation of a parcel of land or a financial contribution of the district.”

6. So How Many Students Are There?
Attachment 10D indicates Fall 2002 enrollment as 1,385 students or 261 FTES. Attachment 36 has Fall 2005 enrollment as 734 students, with no FTES listed. That is a drop of 651 students or 53% in three years. 52 classes were offered at the center in Fall 2002 and only 33 classes in Fall 2005. Clearly it is difficult to attract students to the center when only about 60% of the classes are offered in 2005 that were offered in 2002.

So as the Ventura County Community College District Board of Trustees considers the issue of defunding the new Santa Clara Valley Advanced Technology Education Center, all that the City of Santa Paula is left with is the record: the discussions leading up to the March, 2002 election and the discussions since.

Attachment 6 is a letter to the voters of Ventura County from former VCCCD Chancellor Philip Westin, written a week after the Measure S election. In part he said: “The Board of Trustees…..are committed to ensuring that the projects listed on the bond are completed expeditiously and frugally. This is not only a requirement of law, it is a moral obligation we take seriously in light of the vote of confidence that you, the voters, have given us.”
This commitment has not been fulfilled. The promises made to the voters of Ventura County and to the voters of Santa Paula pertaining to a new educational facility in the Santa Clara Valley have been broken. The real losers here are the young men and women who if they do not have a robust facility nearby, may not go to college anywhere.

The remainder of this report is a chronology of events and pertinent documents from the development of the bond measure to present.
252
5 A Chronology:

Measure “S” and the Funding/Defunding of the Santa Paula Center 2001
On December 1, 2000 and January 26, 2001, upper level management of the Ventura County Community College District (“VCCCD”) conducted a “Futures Forum”. The intent was to set strategic directions for the district and the campuses, in the possible pursuit of a bond measure. (Attachment 1) On February 22, 2001, Larry Calderon gave a brief update on a possible expansion of the East Campus. (The campus had just been expanded two years before to its currently square footage.) (Attachment 2) From August 22-26, 2001, VCCCD had a professional opinion poll taken to determine the level of support for various proposed projects. (Attachment 2A) The construction of the new East Campus Center got a so-so response; most projects were more clearly viewed either positively or negatively, including the construction of the Conejo Center that had only a 34% positive response. On December 4, 2001, the VCCCD Trustees held a special meeting to place Measure S on the March, 2002 Ventura County ballot. 2002
In early versions of the list of projects, the East Campus had varying dollar amounts associated with it, from $11M to $34M. In Exhibit B to Measure S, only the three campuses and the Countywide Projects for Public Safety Instruction (i.e., the fire and sheriff’s academy), had dollar amounts associated with them. (Attachments 3 & 5) This is further underscored in Bond Update #1, dated January 27, 2002, which features the East Campus center and the Regional Fire, Sheriff and Police Training Center. (Attachment 4). This document also refers to the development of a new Ventura College East Campus Center “The potential for continued growth in this location (Santa Clara Valley) places construction of a new facility at the top of the list for the governing board.” On March 10, 2002, after Measure S passed, then Chancellor Westin sent an open letter to the voters of Ventura County thanking them for their support, and including the following statement: “The Board of Trustees, the faculty, classified staff and managers are committed to ensuring that the projects listed on the bond are completed expeditiously and frugally. This is not only a requirement of law, it is a moral obligation we take seriously in light of the vote of confidence that you, the voters, have given us.” (Attachment 6) At the March 26, 2002 meeting of the VCCCD Board, the Chancellor talked about the duties of the Citizen’s Oversight Committee and distributed the document Technical Information Regarding Measure “S”. (Attachment 7) The members of the Citizen’s Oversight Committee were appointed at the June 24, 2002 VCCCD Board meeting. (Attachment 8) 253
6 The Board Construction Subcommittee (including Trustee Bob Gonzales) met on October 8, 2002, and was told that the interviews for an architectural firm for Fire/Sheriff’s Academy Complex were scheduled for October 16, 2002. (Attachment 9). This is the first project with any record of going to the Construction Subcommittee.

On December 12, 2002, Rod Rose sent an e-mail to Larry (presumably Larry Calderon), detailing the process for establishing the Santa Paula Center as a state-recognized “educational center”. Mr. Rose points out that: “In the past, enrollment projections have been the most important consideration, and that requires a minimum of 500 FTEs in either the Fall term or an annual average, whichever is greater (usually the Fall term). There have, however, been exceptions to this rule in the past if it can be demonstrated that the center is meeting a very special need, that the current facilities are hopelessly inadequate to meet that need, if future growth is clearly in evidence that will bring the center to at least the 500 FTEs threshold, or if there are economic efficiencies involved such as the donation of a parcel of land or a financial contribution by the district.” (Attachment 10)
Also on December 12, 2002, Ventura College President Larry Calderon held a “Ventura East Campus Planning Meeting” (Minutes are Attachment 10A) which outlined the beginning of the specific planning process for the new East Campus.

On December 14, 2002, Calderon sent a letter to Robert L. Hulseman, President of Solo Cup Company questioning why the Company was not moving faster on the donation of land to VCCCD for the new East Campus. These discussions with Solo Cup apparently started in May, 2002 (Attachment 10B). Solo Cup responded to Calderon’s letter on December 19, 2002 indicating that they were no longer interested in working with VCCCD on the donation of property. (Attachment 10C)
2003
On January 24, 2003, Santa Paula City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz has first conversation with then Limoneira President Pierre Tada about interest in developing their land in the City’s East Area One General Plan Expansion Area and including ten acres for the Ventura College East Campus.

On February 19, 2003, a “Project Task Force Meeting – East Campus” was held including senior VCCC officials and representatives of the JCM Group. The minutes of this meeting (Attachment 10D) detail the amount of funding available from the bond ($26,610,000) and a detailed overview of the types of facilities planned for the campus.
254
7 In April, 2003, Ventura College produced an “Educational Master Plan” that clearly articulates the current offerings at the East Campus facility and its future plans (Attachment 10E).

On April 4, 2003, Calderon held an “East Campus Site Acquisition Committee Meeting” in Santa Paula with community leaders to begin identifying new sites for the new East Campus facility (Attachment 10F).

At the June 17, 2003 VCCCD Board meeting, there was mention that Trustees Heitmann and Hernandez had agreed to meet and develop a protocol regarding the establishment of centers. President Hernandez also gave a brief report on his meeting with the Santa Paula City Council ad hoc committee regarding the Santa Paula Center on May 23, 2003. (Attachment 11) At the July 21, 2003 Citizen’s Oversight Committee meeting, the Santa Paula Center is described as an offcampus center that would get operation and maintenance funding from the State.

It is also mentioned that the residents of Santa Paula are very supportive of this center. (Attachment 12)
At the October 15, 2003 VCCCD Board meeting, a contract with STRATUS is approved to provide planning and advisory services for the East Campus Educational Center. (Attachment 13 & 13A) At the October 20, 2003 Citizen’s Oversight Committee meeting, the contract with STRATUS is mention, and Handel Evans explains the requirements to build the stand-alone Santa Paula Center, and states that the approval process will be lengthy, 3 or 4 years at a minimum. (Attachment 14)
At the request of Ventura College President Larry Calderon, Martin Hernandez of Supervisor Kathy Long’s Office and Mary Ann Krause of the Santa Paula City Council attended the November 18, 2003 VCCCD Board meeting to express support for the East Campus Center. (Attachment 15) At the December 9, 2003 VCCCD Board meeting, the Trustees issued a letter to the State to serve as preliminary notice for the establishment of the East Campus Educational Center. (Attachments 16 and 17)
2004
On January 20, 2004, the City of Santa Paula and the Limoneira Company enter into a Letter of Cooperation to move forward with master planning of East Area One with providing property for a new Ventura College East Campus as a priority.

The January 26, 2004 minutes of the Citizen’s Oversight Committee reflect the same information, but indicate that Limoneira has offered a 400-acre site for development and that there are SOAR issues involved. (Attachment 18) 255
8 On May 26, 2004, there was a District Service Center meeting. The minutes include a chart of Ventura College Measure “S” priorities, which lists the East Campus Center as IIA, and list four other projects as candidates for elimination. (Attachment 19) This is the first mention identified of eliminating Measure S projects.

The June 24, 2004 Citizen’s Oversight Committee minutes mention that Mr.

Evans, Mr. Studt and Trustee Heitmann attended a meeting hosted by Limoneira regarding the potential land donation. The minutes state “Limoneira has expressed tremendous support for the Center.” The minutes also indicate the potential for joint use of the center with the City Library and possibly the Santa Paula High School District. (Attachment 20)
On September 19, 2004, an e-mail regarding Oxnard College Measure “S” projects also includes the information that The Fire and Sheriff Academy EIR, Master Plan and Schematic Design documents are underway. (Attachment 21) The September 20, 2004 Citizen’s Oversight Committee meeting minutes indicate that there is strong support for the Santa Paula Center to be located on the Limoneira property. (Attachment 22) The minutes also indicate that art Hernandez has resigned from the Board Construction Subcommittee, and that Trustee Bob Gonzales will replace him for the remainder of the year.

On November 13, 2004, the City and Limoneira hold a community meeting to receive comment from the public on potential uses at East Area One.

Representatives from VCCCD make a presentation at this meeting indicating that VCCC will now need forty acres for the East Campus site in order to move forward with the facility
A November 17, 2004 memo from Meznek to the College Presidents indicates that there has been unprecedented construction cost escalation, and bid alternates may have to be used to keep projects within budget. (Attachment 22A) 2005
The Chancellor’s Cabinet met on February 1, 2005. Regarding the Santa Paula Center…Handel Evans confirms, “From a recruitment and educational point of view, you need this center.” He also says: ”Will have a major issue with City of Santa Paula.” They discuss that if SOAR vote does not pass, they will do other projects. (Attachment 23)
An April 12, 2005 Report to the VCCCD Trustees called for the approval of the Measure “S” Proposed Cluster of Priorities. The report mentions that some projects that could be started with minimal CEQA review were started immediately after the bond was approved. The report also says it includes projects which are under construction or which have received funds at a level 256
9 which to abandon them would be fiscally inappropriate. (Attachment 24) The East Campus and the Fire/Sheriff Academy are still both on this list, though the chart shows that the Academy went into the design phase in August of 2004, and the East Campus design has not yet begun.

At the April 18, 2005 Citizen’s Oversight Committee meeting, Chancellor Meznek reported on attending a meeting with Supt of Schools Chuck Weis and SPUHSD Supt David Gomez regarding the establishment of an educational partnership in Santa Paula. Meznek noted that such a partnership might not be in the best interests of the College District. (Attachment 25)
April 20, 2005 e-mail from Leslie Dickey to Handel Evans outlines the discussion from a heated meeting with the Sheriff’s Department over the construction of the Fire/Sheriff’s Academy, and just what was promised. The Sheriff’s rep indicated a feeling that the project was being intentionally delayed. In addition, Lisa Dickey explained “I said we could not legally transfer any of the other Measure S money to the project even if we wanted to.” (Attachment 26)
On May 10, 2005, The VCCCD Trustees received a report from the Chancellor asking their approval of the Five Year Capital Construction Plan. This report shows the costs for the Fire/Sheriff academy being allocated to the District office ($1,25M), to Oxnard College ($7.642M), and to Ventura College ($15.012M).

This is in sharp contrast to the previous documents that showed the money coming out of a separate countywide funding pot. (Attachment 27) A June 9, 2005 e-mail from Meznek to Trustee Miller provides info to the trustee who will address Latino Town Hall that evening. Meznek says that the SPUHSD Supt is trying to acquire part of the VCCCD allocation from Limoneira for a High School. (Attachment 28)
A June 10, 2005 e-mail from Meznek (?) indicates that Larry Miller spoke at Latino Town Hall, and Miller and staff kept ”us” out of the center of pointed debate. (Attachment 29)
Dr. Gabino Aguirre and Bob Borrego attended the Citizen’s Oversight Committee on July 11, 2005 to urge that the funding for the East Campus Center be protected, and that collaborative partnerships be established with other sectors of education. Mr. Wesner of the Committee asked that the issue of moving bond money from one project to another be placed on the October Oversight Committee agenda. (Attachment 30)
An October 7, 2005 memo from Meznek to the VCCCD Trustees mentions a meeting with W, Bobkiewicz. Also mentions Dr. Gomez inviting VCCCD to meeting with City and High School Trustees. (Attachment 31) 257
10 A transcript of the VCCCD Trustees meeting of October 11, 2005 details statements made by the VCCCD bond counsel that Measure “S” bond proceeds can be moved from one campus to another, or to the public safety project, without violating the bond language. Trustee Huber (who was on the Citizen’s Oversight Committee), states that it would not be in line with keeping the faith of the voters to do so. (Attachment 32)
The Minutes of the October 17, 2005 Citizen’s Oversight Committee meeting indicate that Handel Evans indicated that the Conejo and Santa Paula centers are being reexamined. District is reevaluating its immediate need to identify a site, which would serve a long-term purpose. (Attachment 33) On October 21, 2005, Meznek forwarded a packet of information to the VCCCD Trustees that includes the vote on Measure “S” by community, showing that Santa Paula had the second highest vote in favor of the Measure, after Oxnard.

The information packet also shows that 1300 to 1400+ Santa Paula residents are students in the VCCCD system. (Attachment 34)
On November 2, 2005, the Santa Paula City Council, the Santa Paula Elementary School District Board of Education, the Santa Paula Union High School District Board of Trustees adopted a joint resolution to develop an 80 acre master plan for the “Santa Paula Education and Recreation Campus” to accommodate facilities for the three agencies and VCCCD.

The Ventura County Law Enforcement Coordinating Committee (The Sheriff, the DA and 4 chiefs of police) sent a letter dated November 26, 2005 to the VCCCD Trustees, urging that the Fire/Sheriff Academy be developed as “promised”, or it will put current affiliation agreements in jeopardy. (Attachment 35) The VCCCD Draft Market Assessment and Organizational Performance Review, December 12, 2005 includes a presentation on the Measure “S” bond funds. The Ventura College projects now are shown to include the Fire/Sheriff’s Academy at $10M, and the Santa Clara Center as “Not Scheduled”. (Attachment 36) A December 20, 2005 document, VCCCD Use of Bond Proceeds, shows that only $995 of the $24.6M for the East Campus Center has been expended. (Attachment 37)
2006
On January 16, 2006, Associate Chancellor Susan Johnson received a letter from David Casnocha, Bond Counsel, elaborating on responses he gave to questions at the October 11, 2005 VCCCD Trustees meeting. (Attachment 38) On April 4, 2006, Ventura College President Robin Calote sends an email to “Ventura College Colleagues” indicating that the East Campus project will not be 258
11 funded and sets out a number of initiatives to be undertaken to reach out to students “who do not want to travel to the main campus.” (Attachment 39) On April 10, 2006, the East Campus Facility remains on the Measure S website of VCCCD indicating budget for project is $24.61 million (Attachment 40) 259
12 TABLE OF CONTENTS – ATTACHMENTS
Attachment Page Number
1 14A
2 19
2A 20
3 28
4 50
5 52
6 55
7 56
8 59
9 62
10 65
10A 68
10B 71
10C 75
10D 76
10E 83
10F 89
11 95
12 98
13 102
13A 104
260
13 Attachment Page Number
14 110
15 113
16 116
17 118
18 119
19 123
20 125
21 129
22 132
23 136
24 137
25 147
26 150
27 152
28 158
29 160
30 161
31 164
32 165
33 172
34 175
35 198
36 200
261
14 Attachment Page Number
37 217
38 222
39 224
40 230
262

EXHIBIT C -
City of Santa Paula
Letter of Support
263
264
265

EXHIBIT D -
Maps
266
Aerial Map of Proposed Educational Center Site
Location of Proposed Educational Center Site
Proposed
Educational
Center
VC East
Campus
Ventura
College
267
Santa Paula City Council Tentative Agenda Schedule
Updated 1/12/2023

DEPARTMENT MEETING
DATE Monday, January 23, 2023
January 23, 2023 Special Meeting Committee Interviews 4:00 p.m.

Wednesday, February 1, 2023
CDD February 01, 2023 Community Development Department Report FIRE Ventura County Fire Department Report
HR Social Media Policy – Resolution #7432
PD Annual Cops Grant
PW Peck Road Water Main Repair Construction Contract
PW Energy Efficiency Program Status Report
Admin Rescind Pandemic Declaration of Emergency
PW Plans & Specifications for 8th Street Streetlight Repair Project
PW Asset Management System Implementation Report and
Presentation
Wednesday, February 15, 2023
Admin February 15, 2023 City Manager Department Report
PR Security Fence Contract Award
Admin Police Chief Selection Process
Admin District Based Elections Final Map

STUDY SESSION TOPICS
Admin No Smoking Ordinance
Admin Feb/March Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Workshop Admin Jan/Feb Legislative Platform Update

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Admin SoCal Edison discussion on rates
CDD Jan/Feb Review of City Street Naming Policy
CDD VCTC Update on Railroad
CDD Cultural Arts Update
Finance Travel Policy Update
HR/CM Jan/Feb IT Manager Reclassification
CDD Housing In-lieu Funding Expansion
Admin 211 Presentation
Finance March Mid-Year Budget Report
Finance March Investment Report
PW Main Street Crosswalk Project Plans & Specifications CED Façade Improvement Program
CED Housing In-lieu Funding Expansion
268

← All documents from this meeting