Agenda packet, regular meeting — Santa Paula City Council, October 15, 2025

City of Santa Paula
City Council
MAYOR PEDRO A. CHAVEZ

VICE MAYOR CARLOS JUAREZ

COUNCILMEMBER JENNY CROSSWHITE

COUNCILMEMBER LESLIE CORNEJO

COUNCILMEMBER GABRIELA ORNELAS

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE

SANTA PAULA CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2025
6:30 PM - City Council Regular Meeting

SANTA PAULA CITY HALL
970 VENTURA STREET
SANTA PAULA, CA 93060

JULIE LATSHAW, CITY CLERK

DAN SINGER, CITY MANAGER

MONICA CASTILLO, CITY ATTORNEY
City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 1

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
You are invited to participate in all Regular City Council meetings. Agendas are posted in the front of Santa Paula City Hall, 970 Ventura Street, Santa Paula, 72 hours in advance of the scheduled meetings. The City Council's regular meetings start at 6:30 p.m. the first and third Wednesday of each month in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 970 Ventura Street in Santa Paula. Special and Closed Sessions vary by date and time.

HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN PERSON DURING THE MEETING: If you wish to speak at a City Council meeting, please fill out a Public Comment Form noting your name and address and submit the form to the City Clerk. Include the Agenda item number, when appropriate. Public comments are limited to 3 minutes.

1. Items Not on the Agenda: If you wish to discuss an item which is not scheduled on the Agenda, you may address the City Council during Public Comment. Please realize that due to the limitations placed on the City Council by provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council ordinarily cannot take action on any item that is not on the agenda. Because of these restrictions, expect that matters that you identify during public comment may be referred to staff or considered on a future agenda.

2. Agenda Items: Items being considered by the City Council may appear on the Consent Calendar, as an Action Item, or as a Public Hearing. Public comments on each type of item are handled differently, as explained below:
a. For items appearing on the Consent Calendar, please submit a Public Comment Form before the Council takes action on the Consent Calendar. Items that receive a Public Comment Form may be pulled from the Consent Calendar by the Mayor and discussed separately by the City Council.
b. For items appearing as an Action Item, the Mayor will announce the Agenda item and request the staff report, the staff member responsible will give a brief summary of the report; the City Council will have an opportunity to ask questions of staff; members of the public will be given an opportunity to comment on the item and ask additional questions (all members of the public should speak directly into the microphone at the speaker’s platform); and the City Council will discuss the item and then take appropriate action.
c. For items on which a Public Hearing is scheduled, the Mayor will open the public hearing and receive the staff report; members of the public will be given an opportunity to comment on the item and ask additional questions (all members of the public should speak directly into the microphone at the speaker’s platform); the City Council will discuss the item; and the Mayor will close the public hearing after City Council action.

HOW TO PARTICIPATE BEFORE THE MEETING: Members of the public are encouraged to submit email correspondence on any agenda item by sending an email to [email protected]. All public correspondence received by 3:00 p.m. (PT) on the meeting date will be provided to the legislative body before the meeting. Public Comments received after 3:00 p.m. will be provided to the legislative body the next day.

Your Participation in this meeting is in the public domain; meetings are cablecast; minutes of this meeting will reflect your participation in this meeting and are posted on the city’s website.

PLEASE NOTE: Be advised that if you bring a legal challenge to an action, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the meeting described in this Agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or before the meeting.

Any action is subject to the ninety-day time period set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.6.

City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 2

1. CALL TO ORDER
REMINDER: in order to minimize distractions during public meetings, all personal communication devices should be turned off or put in a non-audible mode.

2. INVOCATION

3. FLAG SALUTE

4. ROLL CALL

5. CLOSED SESSION REPORT

6. PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of the public may comment on any item not appearing on the agenda that is within the subject-matter jurisdiction of the City Council. A Public Comment Form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the beginning of the Public Comment period in order to be recognized to speak. Individuals submitting Public Comment Forms after the beginning of the Public Comment period will not be allowed to speak at this time, but may be recognized to speak by the Mayor at the conclusion of the meeting. Individual Councilmembers may briefly respond to Public Comments or ask questions for clarification. The City Council may direct the City Manager to report to the City Council on the item at a later meeting. For items appearing on the Agenda, the public will be invited to make comments at the time the item comes up for City Council consideration. If a member of the public wishes to address a Consent Calendar item, please submit a Public Comment Form for that item. It may then be discussed separately by the Council, and the public will be invited to make comments at that time. At all times, please use the microphone and write your name and address on the Public Comment Form provided.

7. PRESENTATIONS

7.A MAYOR'S RECOGNITION AWARDS - FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA

FAIR WINNERS

7.B SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN OUTREACH
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (805) 933-4208. Notification 48 hours before the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 35, 102-35.104 ADA Title II). Written materials distributed to the City Council within 72 hours of the City Council meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk’s office.

HOW TO VIEW ON YOUR TELEVISION, COMPUTER, OR MOBILE DEVICE: Watch from home live on the local Channel 10, or view the live feed on the city website at the following link: https://www.spcity.org/523/Public-Meeting-Agendas NOTE: Special and Closed Sessions are not recorded and not available on Channel 10 or live feed on the city website.

REGULAR MATTERS - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 3

7.C COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

QUARTERLY REPORT
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive and file the report.

8. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS

9. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
Background information has been provided to the City Council on all matters listed under the Consent Calendar and these items are considered to be routine by the City Council and are normally approved by one motion. If discussion is requested by a Councilmember on any item, or a member of the public wishes to comment on an item, that item may be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.

10.A SEPTEMBER 2025 WARRANTS AND CERTIFICATIONS
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Review and accept the "Certification of Accounts Payable" for the accounts payable payment cycles for September 2025, starting check number 341872 and ending check number 342104.

2. Review and accept the "Certification of Salaries" for the pay period ending dates September 5th, 2025, through September 19th, 2025.

10.B APPROVAL OF MINUTES
City Council Special Meeting July 2, 2025
City Council Regular Meeting July 2, 2025
City Council Special Meeting July 9, 2025
City Council Special Meeting August 6, 2025
City Council Regular Meeting August 6, 2025
City Council Special Meeting August 19, 2025
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Council approve minutes.

10.C MEASURE T BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR FALL 2025 PAVING PROJECT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize a budget allocation in the amount of $1,098,683 to GL 104-5- 9359-660 to fund the Fall 2025 Paving Project.

10.D RETROACTIVE COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR ENGINE REPLACEMENT OF CHEVROLET COLORADO PICKUP (UNIT 283)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 4 Retroactively waive bidding requirements for and ratify the $ 9,991.83 expenditure for the engine replacement and A/C repairs of Unit 283, a 2019 Chevrolet Colorado pickup, operated by the Public Works Department.

11. PUBLIC HEARING
Verification of posting notice by City Clerk
Declaration of conflicts (if any)
Declaration of ex parte contacts (if any)
Open public hearing
Staff presentation
Public comments
Close public hearing
Discussion and action

11.A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO

APPROVE THE FULL COST ANALYSIS OF USER FEES PREPARED BY

WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES AND AMEND AND AUGMENT THE CITY

OF SANTA PAULA FEE SCHEDULE
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 7595 approving the full cost analysis of user fees prepared by Willdan Financial Services and amend and augment the City of Santa Paula Fee Schedule, effective January 1, 2026.

Presented By: Christy Ramirez, Finance Director

11.B
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1350 AMENDING CHAPTERS

16.200 (ADMINISTRATION – GENERAL PROVISIONS), 16.202
(APPLICATIONS, PROCESSING, FILING AND FEES), 16.204 (PUBLIC HEARINGS), 16.206 (APPEALS AND REVOCATIONS), 16.208
(DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS), 16.210 (ZONE CHANGE), 16.212 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS), 16.214 (AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE AND LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACTS), 16.216 (SPECIFIC PLANS),

16.218 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS), 16.220 (VARIANCES), 16.222 (MINOR MODIFICATIONS), 16.224 (ZONING CLEARANCE), 16.227 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS), 16.228 (TEMPORARY USE PERMIT),

16.230 (HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT), 16.234 (DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENTS), 16.236 (ANNEXATIONS), 16.237 (81 ACRE INITIATIVE IMPLEMENTATION), AND 16.238 (SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT) OF TITLE XVI: DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL

CODE IN ORDER TO CORRECT INCONSISTENCIES, OUTDATED

LANGUAGE AND FORMATTING AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE
STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF

THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
RECOMMENDATION:

City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 5 Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing; and

16.204 (Public Hearings), 16.206 (Appeals and Revocations), 16.208 (Development Code Amendments), 16.210 (Zone Change), 16.212 (General Plan Amendments), 16.214 (Agricultural Preserve and Land Conservation Contracts), 16.216 (Specific Plans), 16.218 (Conditional Use Permits), 16.220 (Variances), 16.222 (Minor Modifications), 16.224 (Zoning Clearance), 16.227 (Accessory Dwelling Units), 16.228 (Temporary Use Permit), 16.230 (Home Occupation Permit), 16.234 (Development Agreements), 16.236 (Annexations), 16.237 (81 Acre Initiative Implementation), and 16.238 (Site Development Permit) of Title XVI Development Code of the Santa Paula Municipal Code in order to correct inconsistencies, outdated language and formatting and finding the Action to be Statutorily Exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(B) (3) of the Public Resources Code”
Presented by: Monica Castillo, City Attorney

12. ACTION ITEMS

12.A APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Recommends that the City Council:

Appoint applicants to various Commissions and Committees.

Presented by: Julie Latshaw, City Clerk

12.B INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1349 ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, 2025 EDITION
(CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24), THE 2024
INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, AND THE 2024

INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING POOL AND SPA CODE
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Introduce and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 1349, entitled:

MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA
BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, 2025 EDITION, (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24) INCLUDING THE 2025 CALIFORNIA
City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 6 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; VOLUMES 1 AND 2 OF THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE

INCLUDING APPENDICIES AH PATIO COVERS, AJ EXISTING
STRUCTURES, AND AX SWIMMING POOL SAFETY ACT; THE 2025
CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE INCLUDING APPENDIX M PEAK WATER DEMAND CALCULATOR; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA
ENERGY CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; THE CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; THE 2024 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY
MAINTENANCE CODE; AND THE 2024 INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING

POOL AND SPA CODE

2. Schedule a public hearing to consider adopting the proposed Ordinance at the City Council’s regular meeting of November 5, 2025.

3. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed Ordinance and provide notice of the public hearing twice at least 14 days before the public hearing at which the proposed Ordinance is to be considered for adoption;

4. Take such additional, related action as may be desired.

Presented by: Dan Schultz

12.C CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION

FOR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MOBILE HOME

RENT COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 7591 and Resolution No. 7594 approving the compensation structure for the Mobile Home Rent Review Commission and the Planning Commission.

Presented by: James Mason, Community & Economic Development Director

13. ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS

13.A FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council review future agenda items.

14. ADJOURNMENT
State of California )-
City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 7 County of Ventura )- ss
City of Santa Paula )-
I declare under penalty of perjury that I posted this City Council Agenda on the bulletin board near the front door of City Hall, 970 Ventura Street, Santa Paula, California.

On_________________ at______________Signed:_________________________ Julie Latshaw
City Clerk
City of Santa Paula - City Council - City Council Regular Meeting 8 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: James Mason, Community & Economic Development Director Subject: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

QUARTERLY REPORT
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 7.C

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive and file the report.

BACKGROUND:

PLANNING DIVISION
Planning Commission
Tuesday, Jun 24, 2025
Public Hearing: The planning commission approved Resolution NO. 3871. Recommending that the city council adopt Resolution No. 3871 documenting conformance of the 2025-2027 Capital Improvement Program with the City of Santa Paula General Plan.

Public Hearing: The planning commission approved Resolution No. 3870. Recommending that city council adopt Resolution No. 3870, entitled “A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Paula recommending the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Chapters 16.42 Performance Standards, and 16.44 Fences, Walls, and Hedges, of the Santa Paula Municipal Code in order to correct inconsistencies, outdated language and formatting and finding the action to be statutorily exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b) (3) of the Public Resources Code.”
Tuesday, July 22, 2025 - Cancelled
Tuesday, August 26, 2025
Public Hearing: The planning commission approved Resolution NO. 3872 recommending to the City Council approval of a Resolution formally adopting the City’s Federal Emergency Management Agency-approved Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, as part of the Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, and amending the Hazard and Public Safety Element (‘Safety Element’) of the City of Santa Paula 2040 General Plan to reflect this adoption and required language.
9 Public Hearing: The planning commission approved Resolution No. 3874, recommending that the City Council approve Project No. 2025-CDP-01, recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the development of 213 attached condominiums, Design Review, and approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6114, for 895 Faulkner Road, subject to the conditions of approval.

Public Hearing: The planning commission approved Resolution No. 3873, recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Chapters 16.52 Swimming Pools, 16.56 Amusement Arcades, 16.58 Alcoholic Beverage Sales, 16.60 Child Day Care Facilities, 16.62 Assembly Halls, 16.64 Community Care Facilities, 16.66 Drive-Through Facilities, 16.68 Newsracks, 16.70 Recycling Facilities, 16.72 Service Stations, 16.74 Vending Machines,

16.75 Prohibition on Industrial Hemp Cultivation, 16.76 Yard and Garage Sales, 16.77 Electric Vehicle Charging Systems; Streamlined Permitting, 16.78 Emergency Shelters, 16.79 Regulation of Cannabis Activities, 16.80 Subdivision Regulations, 16.85 Condominiums and Conversions, 16.96 Grading Permits, 16.97 Grading Regulation, 16.98 Hillside Grading Practices, 16.99 Drainage, Erosion, and Dust Control, 16.100 General Provisions, 16.102 Permit and Reclamation Plan, 16.104 Regulations for Operation of Surface Mine, 16.106 Growth Management, 16.108 Transportation Demand Management, and 16.110 Nonconformities of the Santa Paula Municipal Code in order to correct inconsistencies, outdated language and formatting and finding the Action to be Statutorily Exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(B)(3) of the Public Resources Code.

Tuesday, September 23, 2025
Public Hearing: The Planning Commission approved the Resolution No. 3875, entitled “A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Paula recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Chapters 16.200 (Administration – General Provisions), 16.202 (Applications, Processing, Filing and Fees), 16.204 (Public Hearings),

16.206 (Appeals and Revocations), 16.208 (Development Code Amendments), 16.210 (Zone Change), 16.212 (General Plan Amendments), 16.214 (Agricultural Preserve and Land Conservation Contracts), 16.216 (Specific Plans), 16.218 (Conditional Use Permits), 16.220 (Variances), 16.222 (Minor Modifications), 16.224 (Zoning Clearance), 16.227 (Accessory Dwelling Units), 16.228 (Temporary Use Permit), 16.230 (Home Occupation Permit), 16.234 (Development Agreements), 16.236 (Annexations), 16.237 (81 Acre Initiative Implementation), and 16.238 (Site Development Permit) of Title XVI Development Code of the Santa Paula Municipal Code in order to correct inconsistencies, outdated language and formatting and finding the Action to be Statutorily Exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(B)(3) of the Public Resources Code”
Business Licenses
Nine Commercial business licenses and nine Home Business Occupations were issued between November 2024 and January 2025.

Planning Applications
Thirty new planning applications were received between June 2025 and September 2025.

SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
Santa Paula West Business Park Specific Plan (SP-6)
10 Staff is actively working with commercial broker representing the properties to actively market the site for industrial-employment development.

East Area 2 Specific Plan (SP-4)
Staff has been in discussions with Limoneira, Parkstone, Ventura County Health Care agency and Ventura County Fire Department to identify circulation and public safety improvements that add to viability of project development for medical, retail and mixed use.

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT UPDATES
Good Orchard Event Center and Café (133 Mill Street)
The initial project (Wesley Hall repurpose/renovation) which includes a catering and event center, café and alcohol license has completed plan review and renovation of the spaces are underway.

East Area Gateway (Hallock/126/Telegraph)
Plans are under development for a 113,000 square foot commercial center which will include grocery, in-line retail and multiple restaurant pads. Project design review is currently underway and the applicant plans to submit plans for review in the mid-2025.

East Area Triangle Property

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Santa Maria Industrial Park (324 W. Santa Maria Street): Industrial Park Project approved by Planning Commission in 2012. City staff continuing to coordinate with applicants to complete the project since all entitlements and approvals were completed in March.

Santa Paula Self Storage Too (324 E Santa Maria St): Self Storage Facility Proposal for a 5-building, 262-unit self -storage facility. The project is currently under development and completion is expected 4th quarter 2025.

Bender Property (Todd Rd and SR 126)
The developer, Bender Farms, is currently building an additional 76,000 square foot industrial shell building. Plan review has been completed and the site civil engineering and the building pad have been completed. Vertical development is currently underway.

RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Former Kmart (859 Faulkner Rd.)
Harridge Development Group, LLC., the owner and developer has completed Design review and site demolition is currently being coordinated along with community outreach. . The project proposal includes 181 market-rate, for sale, town homes with 31 affordable for sale 2,3 and 4 bedroom units.
12th Street and Harvard apartments
11 16 affordable apartments at Harvard Boulevard and 11th Street. Design review has been completed and the project plan revisions are under review.

Citrus Flats - Red Tail Apartments (18004 East Telegraph Rd) 298-unit apartment complex at East Telegraph Rd. and Whipple Rd. - 162 affordable units (40 Very-Low and 122 Low) along with 136 market-rate units Vertical development is underway with completion of the first phase projected for next summer..

Mixed-Use/Senior Living (603 East Main Street)
Mixed use senior living and commercial project composed of 6,800 square feet of commercial and 27 senior apartments. The developer is working with the Housing Authority on connecting potential tenants through their section-eight waiting list. Project plans are under review.

Harvest at Limoneira-Lewis (East Area 1)
All lots for Phase I of the project have been sold to home builders and 617 homes are occupied. Of the 121 units available in Phase 1b, all units have been sold to Lennar and Richmond American. Lennar has also purchased the entirety of the 545 units which comprise Phase 2 of the development (Foothill neighborhood) which site grading and infrastructure are well underway. Plans for the first Phase of Foothill have been submitted for design review. In addition, Lewis has submitted preliminary plans for the development of a project along Santa Paula Street (directly south of the Sports Park) that will include rental duplex units, live work units and retail units directly south of the Sports Park.

Topa Vista Views Apartments
Homes to Hope, Cabrillo Economic Development and the Santa Paula Housing Authority are collaborating on an affordable housing development consisting of an 112-unit apartment complex on three vacant parcels adjacent to Teague Park. Preliminary financing has been secured and the developer has submitted concept plans. The developer has also conducted community outreach and hosted their first community open house meetings on September 30.

BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION

PERMIT & FEE ACTIVITY
JUNE 2025 - AUGUST 2025
2024 NUMBER OF PERMITS
TOTAL VALUATION:
$18,545,819.23
12 Building Permits 72 $52,308.74
Plumbing Permits 18 $1,296.00
Electrical Permits 91 $8,102.00
Mechanical Permits 13 $1,828.0
Total 194 $63,534.74
2025 NUMBER OF PERMITS TOTAL VALUATION:
$36,680,965.98
Building Permits 66 $17,537.82
Plumbing Permits 32 $2,840.00
Electrical Permits 89 $8,249.00
Mechanical Permits 13 $2,040.00
Total 242 $30,666.82

CODE COMPLIANCE DIVISION
There were 29 code cases opened from June 2025 to August 2025 compliance and 12 cases were closed.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Staff continues to regularly dialogue with commercial and industrial real estate brokers and land owners to look for opportunities to connect businesses with available properties and expand options for employment growth.

In addition, the department participates in business round-table meetings, PBID coordination and face-to-face meetings with businesses.

Marketing
Staff is working on strategies to use the approved marketing budget allocation for community promotion in digital, poster and print media - including placement in Ventura, Ojai, Santa Clarita, Santa Barbara Airport and Burbank Airport. In October the department website will begin promoting commercial and industrial properties available for sale or lease. In coming weeks staff will be collaborating with the Economic Development Collaborative and the County Economic Vitality Department on opportunities to connect with unmanned aircraft business opportunities.

Business Attraction
Staff is currently working with brokers and business owners on several new employment generating industrial business prospects.

Economic Development Standing Committee
The Committee has had two meetings in the last three months. The group discussed the implementation of a business outreach program, strategies for addressing vacancies in downtown retail spaces and soliciting businesses at the business round-table event for input on vision and goals that can improve the business environment.

OTHER ACTIVITIES
Housing and the Unhoused
13 The Committee has recommended funding assistance for the Housing Trust Fund Ventura County and the city council committed funding of: $200,000 over two years toward HTFVC’s Revolving Loan Fund for affordable housing development assistance.

Santa Paula, Fillmore and Ventura County have cooperatively developed a inter-jurisdictional MOU to provide funding assistance for the Spirit of Santa Paula Harvard Shelter. The first payment to Spirit for the first quarter of the 2025-2026 fiscal year will be provided this month.

Downtown Improvements
Staff has begun outreach to facade applicants and is working to assist applicants in completing applications. Once contractors have been finalized and scope of work for each project has been defined, improvements will commence. Staff from multiple city departments are coordinating with the Chamber and the PBID on downtown enhancements including parking, lighting and signage.

Mobile Home Rent Review
The ownership of 400 mobile estates submitted a second application for a rent adjustment and the request went to a public hearing of the rent Review Commission. After testimony and deliberation, the commission voted to deny the application and request for rent increase.

Plan Check Software Implementation
Planning and Building staff are meeting weekly on the implementation of permitting, plan check and project management software. Plans are to be fully function Q1 2026.

Project Isabella
Staff continues to serve on the board and on the task force to strategize and implement early childhood development programs in Santa Paula
Housing Opportunities Made Easier - 2025 Conference
The Connecting Communities - Housing Conference will be held on Thursday October 16 from 8:00 -to 2:30 PM at the Serra Center 5205 Upland Road, Camarillo, CA 93012. The event will host 300 attendees and will focus on innovative housing solutions, collaboration, and policy advancements.

ANALYSIS:

STRATEGIC PLAN:

FISCAL IMPACTS:

OPTIONS:

ATTACHMENTS:
14 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Beatriz Jimenez, Assistant Finance Director
Subject: SEPTEMBER 2025 WARRANTS AND CERTIFICATIONS
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 10.A

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Review and accept the "Certification of Accounts Payable" for the accounts payable payment cycles for September 2025, starting check number 341872 and ending check number 342104.

2. Review and accept the "Certification of Salaries" for the pay period ending dates September 5th, 2025, through September 19th, 2025.

BACKGROUND:

This staff report certifies the separation of duties between the Preparer (Accounting and Payroll Specialist) and the Reviewer (Finance Director and Assistant Finance Director).

Presented in the attached documents:
a) CERTIFICATION OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS by check number range and dates.

It also discloses any voided checks.
b) EXPENSE REPORTS showing the amount and funds accounts payable came from.

The "Check Report" depicts the following columns:
c) AP-ACCOUNTS PAYABLE for the vendors (non-City staff) by the vendor number, vendor name, payment date, payment amount and check number (entitled 'number'). d) PY-PAYROLL for benefit payments, insurance, retirement, etc. Benefits payable on behalf of City staff.
e) Bank Code Summary by payment type.
f) Fund Summary by fund the accounts payables utilized. 15 CERTIFICATION OF SALARIES
This is the certification (separation of duties between "preparer" and the "reviewer") of salaries and benefits (payroll checks) by fund. It lists salary (payroll) issued checks by beginning and ending check number, payroll ending dates September 5th, 2025, through September 19th, 2025.

ANALYSIS:

See the attachment to this staff report for expense breakdown by respective fund.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

None.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

None.

OPTIONS:

As an alternative to staff's recommendation, the City Council may:

1. Decline to receive and file September 2025 Certifications of Accounts Payable Checks and Certifications of Salaries.

ATTACHMENTS:

September 2025 Payroll and AP Certifications.pdf
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
Subject: APPROVAL OF MINUTES
City Council Special Meeting July 2, 2025
City Council Regular Meeting July 2, 2025
City Council Special Meeting July 9, 2025
City Council Special Meeting August 6, 2025
City Council Regular Meeting August 6, 2025
City Council Special Meeting August 19, 2025
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 10.B

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Council approve minutes.

BACKGROUND:

An account of all proceedings of the Legislative Body in open meetings shall be kept by the Clerk/Secretary. The Clerk/Secretary shall prepare an abbreviated record of the meeting proceedings for approval by the Legislative Body which when adopted by the Legislative Body shall be the official Minutes of the meeting. Amendment of the minutes may be made only as to factual accuracy and not as to a change of intent. The Minutes of the meeting need not be verbatim. Only the best and most complete available recording of the meeting shall constitute the official record of the Legislative Body, but the Minutes shall constitute the official record of the Legislative Body meeting where a verbatim record of the meeting is not available. Unless requested by a majority of the quorum, the minutes may be approved without reading.

ANALYSIS:

None.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is not a goal or objective in the City Council's two-year Strategic Plan, however, the Minutes shall constitute the official record of the Legislative Body.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

There are no fiscal impacts for this item.
31 OPTIONS:

None.

ATTACHMENTS:
2025.07.02 City Council Special Minutes.pdf
2025.07.02 City Council Regular Minutes.pdf
2025.07.09 City Council Special Minutes.pdf
2025.08.06 City Council Special Minutes.pdf
2025.08.06 City Council Regular Minutes.pdf
2025.08.19 City Council Special Minutes.pdf
32 CITY OF SANTA PAULA
City Council Special Meeting
July 2, 2025, 4:00 PM

MINUTES
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chavez called the meeting to order at 4:02pm.
2) ROLL CALL
Members Present: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Gabriela Ornelas, and Leslie Cornejo
Councilmember Ornelas arrived at 4:04pm.
3) PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
4) CONSENT CALENDAR

4.A) FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE THREE-YEAR ON-CALL

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PHOENIX CIVIL
ENGINEERING, INC.

Motion: Approve Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Second Amendment to the Three-Year On-Call Professional Services Agreement with Phoenix Civil Engineering, Inc. to increase the not-toexceed compensation to $270,000 for FY 24/25, and $400,000 for FY 25/26 and FY 26/27.

Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Leslie Cornejo
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Gabriela Ornelas, Leslie Cornejo
5) ORDER OF BUSINESS

5.A) STUDY SESSION ON USER AND COST ALLOCATION FEES
Council provided staff with feedback.
33 6) CLOSED SESSION

6.A) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54957.6 - City Representatives: Chief Labor Negotiator Irma Rodriguez Moisa, City Manager Dan Singer, Finance Director Christy Ramirez, and Human Resources Administrator Lorena Alvarez; Employee Organizations: Community Services Officer Association; Mid-Management Association; Professional & Supervisory Association; Service Employee International Union, Local 721 (SEIU); Santa Paula Police Officers Association (SPPOA); and Unrepresented Employees: Executive Management; Confidential employees; Part-time employees.

6.B) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to Government Code § 54957(b)(1), Title: City Manager
Council recessed to closed session.
7) CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Monica Castillo reported there was no reportable action taken. 8) ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Chavez adjourned the meeting at 5:00 pm.

Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
ATTEST:
34 CITY OF SANTA PAULA
City Council Regular Meeting
July 2, 2025, 6:30 PM

MINUTES
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chavez called the meeting to order at 6:30pm.
2) INVOCATION
Deacon Al Guilin provided the Invocation.
3) FLAG SALUTE
Councilmember Cornejo led the flag salute.
4) ROLL CALL
Members Present: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, and Gabriela Ornelas
5) CLOSED SESSION REPORT FROM SPECIAL MEETING 6/30/2025 AND SPECIAL MEETING 7/2/2025
City Attorney Monica Castillo announced no reportable action was taken on the following:

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE 54957.6 - City Representatives: Chief Labor Negotiator Irma Rodriguez Moisa, City Manager Dan Singer, Finance Director Christy Ramirez, and Human Resources Administrator Lorena Alvarez; Employee Organizations: Community Services Officer Association; Mid-Management Association; Professional & Supervisory Association; Service Employee International Union; Local 721 (SEIU); Santa Paula Police Officers Association (SPPOA); and Unrepresented Employees: Executive Management; Confidential employees; Part-time employees.

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to Government Coode 54957(b)(1), Title: City Manager.
6) PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
35 7) PRESENTATIONS

7.A) REY FRUTOS PROCLAMATION
Mayor Chavez alongside Council presented Rey Frutos with a proclamation for positive impact in the community.

7.B) VENTURA COUNTY FAIR POSTER PRESENTATION
Members of the Ventura County Junior Fair Board presented this year's Ventura County Fair poster.

7.C) FARM BUREAU OF VENTURA COUNTY PRESENTATION
Maurine from the Ventura County Farm Bureau gave a presentation on the overview and profile of the agriculture in Ventura County.

7.D) PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH PROCLAMATION
Mayor Chavez alongside Council presented the Parks and Recreation Commission Chair Vanessa Olmos and the Parks and Recreation department staff with a proclamation for Parks and Recreation month.

7.E) POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT
Chief Don Aguilar presented his Police Department report. 8) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Vice Mayor Juarez:

Attended the Senior Advisory Committee meeting; State of the City Event; Rose Garden dedication for Gary Nasal; the Centennial Time Capsulez; the Birthday and Anniversary Celebration for City Staff; the Santa Paula Pride event; and the Annual Santa Paula Historical Society.

Councilmember Crosswhite:

Announced the Ventura County Transportation Commission should be reaching out for the city to schedule a presentation on the short-range transit plan this summer; and that the SESPE Railroad bridge should be finalized. Attended the California Association of Local Governments meetings and retreat; the Santa Paula Beautiful event; and the ribbon cutting ceremony for Santa Paula Cellars.

Councilmember Ornelas:

Attended similar events to Vice Mayor Juarez.

Councilmember Cornejo:

Attended the Ventura Regional Sanitation District meeting. 9) CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Singer:

Reported: Closed on 4th of July, no council meetings until August 6th, attended similar events as Juarez, Ornelas and Cornejo.
36 10) CONSENT CALENDAR

10.A) CANYON BOOSTER PUMP UPGRADE PROJECT

10.B) CITY SUBLEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE SANTA PAULA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AT 866 E. MAIN STREET
Motion: Approve the sublease agreement with the Santa Paula Chamber of Commerce for 209 square feet of office space at 866 East Main Street for customer service and general office use; and Authorize the City Manager to execute the sublease agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Gabriela Ornelas Vote: Motion carried 4-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas
Vice Mayor Juarez recused from this item.

10.C) AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT A LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION

FUND GRANT APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF PARKS AND RECREATION OFFICE OF GRANTS AND LOCAL

SERVICES

10.D) ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1346 AMENDING CHAPTERS

16.13, 16.15, 16.23, 16.25, 16.29, 16.31, 16.33, 16.34, 16.35 AND

16.40 OF THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE IN ORDER TO

CORRECT INCONSISTENCIES, OUTDATED LANGUAGE AND

FORMATTING AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY
EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(b)(3) AND 15168(c) (2) OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE.

Motion: Approve CONSENT CALENDAR items 10 A, 10 C and 10 D.

Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Carlos Juarez
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas
Mayor Pedro A Chavez Pulled Item 10B for seperate discussion and vote 11) ACTION ITEMS

11.A) SANTA PAULA MASTER PLAN FOR AGING
Motion: Approve Resolution No. 7576 Santa Paula Master Plan for Aging.

Moved by Leslie Cornejo, seconded by Carlos Juarez
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
37 Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

11.B) RESOLUTION NO. 7572 OF THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA

AUTHORIZING A LOAN FROM THE CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING
TRUST FUND TO PEOPLE’S SELF HELP HOUSING
Motion: Approve Resolution No. 7572 authorizing a City Affordable Housing Fund loan to People Self Help Housing (PSSH) ("Nonprofit Organization") for the People's Place project at 714–716 West Harvard Boulevard in the amount of $600,000 in the form of a loan at 4% interest for a 30-year term, contingent upon the following:

County amends its documents to reflect changes in Residual Receipts.

HCD includes the City Loan in the list of approved loan in the documents it has drafted.

The Investor prepares an amendment to the Partnership Agreement to reflect the additional funding source
Chase Bank prepares a Subordination Agreement with the City The City prepares a Promissory Note, Deed of Trust, and Regulatory Agreement

2. Adopt a budget allocation of $600,000 in GL account 219-5-9093-502.

Staff will do year end entries to book as Loans Payable.

Moved by Carlos Juarez, seconded by Jenny Crosswhite
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

11.C) RESOLUTION NO. 7573 AUTHORIZING CONDITIONAL,

SEQUENTIAL ACCEPTANCE OF EAST AREA ONE THREE-MILLION

GALLON TANK IMPROVEMENTS (HARVEST AT LIMONEIRA)
Motion: Approve Resolution No. 7573 Authorizing Conditional Sequential Acceptance of East Area One Three-Million Gallon Tank Improvements.

Authorize the City Manager to enter into a license agreement with LLCB and Lennar to access the tank site after it is owned by the City, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Authorize the City Manager to sign and record storm drain easements on the tank site to the City from Lennar and LLCB after the site is owned by the City, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Leslie Cornejo
Vote: Motion carried 4-0
Yes: Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

11.D) CITY OF SANTA PAULA 2025-2027 POLICY & LEGISLATIVE AGENDA Motion: Approve Resolution No. 7575, approving the 2025–2027 Policy & Legislative Agenda and updating the 2023 Legislative Platform. 38 Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Pedro A Chavez Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

11.E) APPROVAL OF THE SANTA PAULA CITY COUNCIL 2-YEAR
STRATEGIC PLAN FOR 2025-2027
Motion: Approve Resolution No. 7571, establishing the City of Santa Paula Council 2-Year Strategic Plan for 2025-2027.

Moved by Carlos Juarez, seconded by Jenny Crosswhite
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

11.F) CONSIDERATION OF A TENDER OFFER OF LIMCO STOCK
Council provide staff with direction on the offer. No action was taken. 12) ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS

12.A) FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
13) ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Chavez adjourned the meeting at 9:50 p.m.

Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
ATTEST:
39 CITY OF SANTA PAULA
City Council Special Meeting
July 9, 2025, 4:30 PM

MINUTES
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chavez called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m.
2) ROLL CALL
Members Present: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Gabriela Ornelas, and Leslie Cornejo
3) PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
4) CONSENT CALENDAR

4.A) HILLSBOROUGH OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT

4.B) SANTA PAULA GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 ANNUAL BUDGET AND ASSESSMENT LEVY
Motion: Approve CONSENT CALENDAR
Moved by Pedro A Chavez
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Gabriela Ornelas, Leslie Cornejo
5) CLOSED SESSION

5.A) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to Government Code § 54957(b)(1), Title: City Manager
Council recessed to closed session.
6) CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Monica Castillo reported there was no reportable action taken. 40 7) ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Chavez adjourned the meeting.

Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
ATTEST:
41 CITY OF SANTA PAULA
City Council Special Meeting
August 6, 2025, 4:30 PM

MINUTES

SPECIAL MEETING - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chavez called the meeting to order at 4:36 p.m.
2) FLAG SALUTE
Mayor Chavez led the flag salute.
3) ROLL CALL
Members Present: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Gabriela Ornelas, and Leslie Cornejo
4) PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
5) ORDER OF BUSINESS

5.A) STUDY SESSION: HARVEST COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) TERM SHEET
City Attorney Monica Castillo explained Mayor Chavez is not required to recuse himself from this item.

Presentations were provided on Harvest Community Facilities District (CFD) Term Sheet.
6) CLOSED SESSION

6.A) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54957.6 - City Representatives: City Manager Dan Singer, Finance Director Christy Ramirez, and Human Resources Administrator Lorena Alvarez; Employee Organizations:

Community Services Officer Association and Unrepresented Employees:

Executive Management
42 6.B) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to Government Code § 54957(b)(1), Title: City Manager

6.C) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(d)(2) and (e)(1): 1 potential case
Council recessed to closed session.
7) CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Monica Castillo reported there was no reportable action taken. 8) ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Chavez adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m.

Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
ATTEST:
43 CITY OF SANTA PAULA
City Council Regular Meeting
August 6, 2025, 6:30 PM

MINUTES

REGULAR MATTERS - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chavez called the meeting to order at 6:41 P.M.
2) INVOCATION
Chaplain Kay Wilson Bolton provided the invocation
3) FLAG SALUTE
Vice Mayor Juarez led the flag salute
4) ROLL CALL
Members Present: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, and Gabriela Ornelas
5) CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Monica Casstillo reported : The City Council recessed into closed session to discuss items 6A through 6C on the special meeting agenda. These included: (A) Conference with Labor Negotiators (Gov. Code §54957.6) City Representatives: City Manager Dan Singer, Finance Director Christie Ramirez, and Human Resources Administrator Lorena Alvarez, Labor groups discussed:

Community Services Officer Association and unrepresented executive management employees, (B) Public Employee Evaluation (Gov. Code §54957(b)(1)) Position: City Manager, (C) Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Gov. Code §54956.9(d)(2)) One potential case The Council did not complete discussions on all items. They proceeded with the anticipated litigation item, and that discussion will continue later this evening.

No reportable action taken
44 6) PUBLIC COMMENT
James Lantiegne was called to speak on 2nd annual film festival.

Fabiola Gomez was called to speak on the raids happening by ICE.

Audrey Vincent was called to speak in support of our field workers.

Trina Nagala was called to speak on the raids happening by ICE.

Gabino Aguirre read by Constance on the raids happening by ICE.

Joy Cummings was called to speak place something to protect from ICE.

Mary Ann Krause was called to speak on the raids happening by ICE.

Sharon Kufeld was called to speakon the raids happening by ICE.

Gabe Teran was called to speak on the raids happening by ICE. Also share nitrous oxide for airsoft, long term effects for recreational purposes. Oxnard banded the sale of these nitrous oxide canisters and would like the City of Santa Paula to do the same.

Ginger Gherardi was called to speak on the Ag Museum and disagrees with any closing of hours.

John Procter was called to speak on the raids happening by ICE.

Zuleth Lucao was called to speak on the raids happening by ICE.

Constance Leshisn was called to speak on the raids happening by ICE. 7) PRESENTATIONS

7.A) MAYOR’S RECOGNITION AWARDS
Mayor provided recognition awards to flight 126 and their staff.

Recognition to Brittany Najera for Mothers against Drunk Driving.

Recognition to Deacon Al Guilin for outstanding contributions within the Latino business community
Recognition Sandra Montoya for deep appreciation of unwavering dedication, compassion, and 14 years of service as a Promotora de Salud. and to Maria Hernandez for deep appreciation of unwavering dedication, compassion, and 3 years of service as a Promotora de Salud.

7.B) 805 DOCUFUND PRESENTATION
This item was pulled.

7.C) 2025 LABOR DAY PARADE POSTER
45 Chris Ines presented the 2025 Labor Day Parade Poster

7.D) SENIOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE ANNUAL PRESENTATION
Ray Wellman presented a Presentation on the Senior Advisory Committee.

7.E) SANTA PAULA ARTE & CULTURA COLLECTIVE PRESENTATION Jennifer Carrillo provided a presentation on the Santa Paula Arte & Cultura Collective.
8) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
This item was skipped.
9) CITY MANAGER REPORTS
This item was skipped.
10) CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion: Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.A, 10.C, 10.D, 10.E, 10.F, 10.G,

10.H, 10.I, 10.J, 10.M, 10.N, 10.O, 10.P, 10.Q with Vice Mayor Juarez recusing on Item 10.H; and approve as amended: Item 10.B redline version of Resolution 7569 changing title of Chief Technology Officer, Item 10.K adding additional language under staff recommendations to authorize funding for year 1 ($40,000) and Year 2 ($20,000) - funded through the approved two-year budget for Fiscal Years 2025-2026 and 2026-2027, under General Ledger No. 800-5-3001-207 (Professional/Contract Services - Computer/Software) and the remaining $20,000 in year 2 will be funded through an additional budget appropriation from General Ledger No. 800-5-3001-215 (General Plan Maintenance Fund), and Item 10.L adding addition language under staff recommendations to add approve budget transfer from ARPA funds (General Ledger No. 412-5-3002-209) to ARPA Software (General Ledger No. 412-5- 3002-207) in the amount of $25,830 for the two-year contract Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Leslie Cornejo
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

10.A) APPROVAL OF EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS FOR UNREPRESENTED:

CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 7570 FOR THE TERM OF JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2027

10.B) APPROVAL OF EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS FOR UNREPRESENTED:

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO.7569 FOR THE TERM OF JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2027

10.C) 2025-2027 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU), LOCAL 721
46 10.D) 2025-2027 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE SANTA

PAULA POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATON

10.E) 2025-2027 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE MID

MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION

10.F) AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SOLID WASTE SOLUTIONS, INC.

10.G) PURCHASE OF FORD F150 LIGHTNING EV TO COMPLY WITH CARB

ADVANCED CLEAN FLEETS REGULATIONS

10.H) LICENSE AGREEMENTS WITH POTENTIAL UNION OIL BUILDING USERS Vice Mayor Juarez recused himself from this item.

Brian Schumacher was called to speak supporting the License Agreements.

10.I) NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE POLICE STATION REMODEL PHASE I

10.J) CITY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE INDEPENDENT ORDER OF ODD FELLOWS AT 866 E. MAIN STREET FOR CITY OFFICES AND SUBLEASE

TO ATHENS SERVICES

10.K) SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR PERMIT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
Council approved with additional wording to staff recommendations: adding additional language under staff recommendations to authorize funding for year 1 ($40,000) and Year 2 ($20,000) - funded through the approved two-year budget for Fiscal Years 2025-2026 and 2026-2027, under General Ledger No. 800-5-3001-207 (Professional/Contract Services - Computer/Software) and the remaining $20,000 in year 2 will be funded through an additional budget appropriation from General Ledger No. 800-5-3001-215 (General Plan Maintenance Fund)

10.L) PLACER AI DATA ANALYTICS SOFTWARE ORDER FORM AMENDMENT 2025 - 2027
Council approved with additional wording to staff recommendations: Also approve a budget transfer from ARPA funds (General Ledger No. 412-5-3002- 209) to ARPA Software (Genral Ledger No. 412-5-3002-207) in the amount of $25,830 for the two-year contract.

10.M) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
City Council Special Meeting May 7, 2025
City Council Regular Meeting May 7, 2025
City Council Special Meeting May 14, 2025
City Council Special Meeting May 21, 2025
City Council Regular Meeting May 21, 2025
City Council Special Meeting June 4, 2025
City Council Regular Meeting June 4, 2025
City Council Special Meeting June 9, 2025
City Council Special Meeting June 12, 2025
47 10.N) JUNE 2025 WARRANTS AND CERTIFICATIONS

10.O) ACCEPTANCE OF GATE DETECTOR MAINTENANCE EASEMENT FROM

LENNAR - HARVEST AT LIMONEIRA

10.P) INVESTMENT POLICY UPDATE

10.Q) DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY DISSOLUTION AND RELEASE OF FUNDS
11) ACTION ITEMS

11.A) SANTA PAULA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT JOINT USE

AGREEMENT
Motion: Approve as amended 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Joint Use Agreement with the Santa Paula Unified School District.

Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Carlos Juarez
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

11.B) CONSIDERATION OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT

AGREEMENT FOR OPERATIONAL FUNDING OF THE SPIRIT OF

SANTA PAULA HARVARD SHELTER
Motion: Approve the First Amendment to the Joint Agreement between the County of Ventura, the City of Santa Paula, and the City of Fillmore for operational funding of the Spirit of Santa Paula Harvard Shelter.

Approve a budget allocation of $30,000.08 from an anticipated positive General Fund balance from fiscal year 2024/2025 (General Ledger No. 800-2284).

Moved by Carlos Juarez, seconded by Leslie Cornejo
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

11.C) FALL PAVEMENT PROGRAM
Motion: Approve Authorizing the City Manager to issue a work order for J & H Engineering, to provide street maintenance services in accordance with the three-year street maintenance agreement.

Moved by Carlos Juarez, seconded by Jenny Crosswhite
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

11.D) ATHENS SERVICES REQUEST FOR EXTRAORDINARY

ADJUSTMENT TO MAXIMUM SERVICE RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL

AND COMMERCIAL WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES
48 This item was presented by Bruce Belluschi, Management Analyst Public Works.

Rondi Guthrie with Athens provided a presentation on Athens request for rate review.

Council discussed creating an Ad Hoc Committee, who then could research options.

Motion: Approve Ad Hoc Committee with Mayor Chavez and
Councilmember Crosswhite.

Moved by Leslie Cornejo, seconded by Carlos Juarez
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

11.E) RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY REPORT ENTITLED PRIORITIZING

BEST PRACTICE STREET MAINTENANCE
Motion: Approve the form response letter to the Ventura County Grand Jury and authorize the Mayor to sign the letter.

Moved by Jenny Crosswhite, seconded by Leslie Cornejo
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas

11.F) FOURTH AMENDMENT TO CITY MANAGEMENT EMPLOYMENT

AGREEMENT
Motion: Approve The Fourth Amendment to the City Manager Employment Agreement.

Moved by Carlos Juarez, seconded by Jenny Crosswhite
Vote: Motion carried 5-0
Yes: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Leslie Cornejo, Gabriela Ornelas
12) ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS

12.A) FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
13) ADJOURNMENT
Council recessed back to closed session. Mayor Chavez adjourned the meeting at 12:30 a.m.

ATTEST:
49 Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
50 CITY OF SANTA PAULA
City Council Special Meeting
August 19, 2025, 5:00 PM

MINUTES

SPECIAL MEETING - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chavez called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
2) ROLL CALL
Members Present: Pedro A Chavez, Carlos Juarez, Jenny Crosswhite, Gabriela Ornelas, and Leslie Cornejo
3) PUBLIC COMMENT
4) CLOSED SESSION

4.A) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54957.6 - City Representatives: City Manager Dan Singer, Finance Director Christy Ramirez, and Human Resources Administrator Lorena Alvarez; Employee Organizations:

Community Services Officer Association; Professional & Supervisory Association; and Unrepresented Employees: Executive Management

4.B) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to Government Code § 54957(b)(1), Title: City Manager

4.C) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(d)(2) and (e)(1): 1 potential case
Council recessed to closed session.
5) CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Monica Castillo reported there was no reportable action taken. 6) ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Chavez adjourned the meeting at 6:50 p.m.
51 Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
ATTEST:
52 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Dale Goodman, Public Works Director
Subject: MEASURE T BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR FALL 2025 PAVING

PROJECT
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 10.C

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize a budget allocation in the amount of $1,098,683 to GL 104-5-9359-660 to fund the Fall 2025 Paving Project.

BACKGROUND:

On August 6, 2025, staff presented to the City Council the Fall 2025 paving program for approval, and addressed the status of road pavement conditions throughout the City. The Street Maintenance Program proposes the completion of street paving for those portions of Terracina, Loma Vista, La Vuelta and Mill Street not paved due to conflicts with the Mill Street Water Main Replacement Project, as well as those portions of McKevett Heights and Teague Drive previously programmed. Additionally programmed is paving for portions of Main Street, which has experienced accelerated pavement deterioration due to the detouring of traffic from Harvard Boulevard during the extensive period of utility construction and street improvements associated with the project. Additionally, the section of Main Street between 7th and Peck was partially paved, together with sections of paving associated with the crosswalk improvements at Lucada, Cameron, Dean and 4th Street, and the current program plans to complete the continuity of paving for consistency and safety.

ANALYSIS:

On August 6, 2025, staff requested a budget transfer from Fund 104-9386 to Fund 104-9359 in the amount of $1,098,683 to support the Fall 2025 Paving Program. However, it has since been identified that the requested budget in Fund 104-9386 no longer exists.

This issue stems from a prior budget adjustment approved by City Council on February 5, 2025, for the Notice of Completion of the Harvard Project. At that time, the budget in Fund 104-9386 was reduced to zero with the understanding that ARPA Fund 412-9386 would be used to cover the associated project costs. As a result, no available budget remains in Fund 104-9386, meaning the August 6 budget allocation request is not possible—despite approval. 53 While sufficient funding is available, a new budget allocation must now be established in Fund 104-9359 in the amount of $1,098,683 to proceed with the project. This amount has already been reviewed and approved by the Measure T Committee. This adjustment is necessary due to the February action that effectively zeroed out the source fund.

Given the current fund balances and prior Council action, a formal budget allocation is required at this time.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

The Project supports the currently adopted Strategic Plan in achieving the following goals:

Infrastructure, Transportation & Mobility
Goal: Maintain and develop the City’s infrastructure to be safe, sustainable, innovative and cost-efficient.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

The budget allocation requested will be funded from available Fund Balance in Measure T, which was made available as noted in the analysis section above.

Fund Source Budget Requested
104 - General Fund-Measure T -
Fund Balance
$1,098,683
OPTIONS:

The Council has the following available alternative options to Staff’s recommendations:

1. Do not authorize the recommended Measure T budget allocation to fund the Fall 2025 Paving Project, and delay critical street maintenance work that is essential for Citywide street maintenance.

ATTACHMENTS:
54 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Dale Goodman, Public Works Director
Subject: RETROACTIVE COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR ENGINE REPLACEMENT OF CHEVROLET COLORADO PICKUP (UNIT 283)
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 10.D

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

Retroactively waive bidding requirements for and ratify the $ 9,991.83 expenditure for the engine replacement and A/C repairs of Unit 283, a 2019 Chevrolet Colorado pickup, operated by the Public Works Department.

BACKGROUND:

Unit 283, a 2017 Chevrolet Colorado, is owned and operated by the SP Water Division. It was brought into Fleet Services when the driver noticed a loud noise coming from the engine while it was running. At the time, two of the division's 3 personnel were out with health issues, and the division supervisor was trying to manage the work of servicing the entire city fleet by himself.

To keep up with vehicle maintenance and repairs, he utilized external service providers, approved by the city —D&S Autoworks, Raul’s Smog Shop, and Bunnin Chevrolet.

On July 11th, the truck was sent to D&S Autoworks for a safety inspection and to diagnose the engine noise (see attached invoices). D&S Autoworks informed the Maintenance Supervisor, by phone, that the engine had seized and likely required replacement. When asked for a quote to perform the repair, D&S declined, stating that the work was too extensive for their facility. No written refusal was provided.

After contacting Raul’s Smog Shop, explaining the situation, and asking if they were available to diagnose and potentially replace the engine, they too declined, stating that they were too busy to take on such a large job. Again, no written refusal was provided.

Finally, staff reached out to Bunnin Chevrolet, who agreed to evaluate the engine. They arranged for the vehicle to be towed to their dealership and stated that disassembly would be necessary to properly diagnose the issue. They were authorized to proceed. Their service writer later informed staff that the engine was beyond repair and needed replacement. He provided an estimate of $15,906.64. Fortunately, through a customer loyalty program, General Motors covered approximately 60% of the cost, reducing the City's cost to an estimated $6,872.84.

The Water Superintendent was contacted to discuss the repair. He confirmed that he wanted 55 to proceed. During the engine repair, Bunnin Chevrolet technicians discovered additional issues with the A/C compressor and related components. The cost to repair the A/C system was $2,873.55, as was authorized as well.

Although three estimates were sought, only one service provider was willing to do the work and provided an estimate.

ANALYSIS:

At this time, the work is complete. The truck is back in service. However, because the City didn't follow protocols spelled out in the City's Purchasing Ordinance, staff is retroactively asking Council to authorize the purchase of the parts and the repairs to the vehicle. The Fleet Manager has been coached on the importance of following protocol. In his defense, he was working extensive hours, and was simply trying hard to balance his workload while meeting the needs of the various city departments.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

HEALTHY, CONNECTED & THRIVING COMMUNITY
This piece of equipment is integral to the effective operations of the Water Enterprise, which is tasked with providing safe, abundant, life-sustaining culinary water to all of the citizens of Santa Paula.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

Description GL Account Amount
283 - Engine Replacement 620-5-5072-307 $6,872.84
283 - A/C Repairs 620-5-5072-307 $2,873.55
283 - Towing 620-5-5072-307 $ 80.00
283 - Taxes 620-5-5072-307 $ 165.44
total $9,991.83
OPTIONS:

As an option, Council could refuse to authorize payment of the invoice.

ATTACHMENTS:

Bunnin Invoice for unit 283 073125.pdf
CITY OF SP Unit 283 Quote 082125.pdf
D&S Autoworks Diagnosis Invoice 071125.pdf
56 57
58 59
60 61
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Christy Ramirez, Finance Director
Subject: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO

APPROVE THE FULL COST ANALYSIS OF USER FEES PREPARED BY

WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES AND AMEND AND AUGMENT THE

CITY OF SANTA PAULA FEE SCHEDULE
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 11.A

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Presented By: Christy Ramirez, Finance Director
BACKGROUND:

On August 29th, 2022, the City Council authorized staff to contract with Willdan Financial Services (“WFS”) for the purpose of examining and updating the City’s existing user fee schedule. The intent of the exercise was to determine the full cost of providing certain municipal services and has resulted in the creation of an updated Comprehensive Fee Schedule, which include, but is not limited to Administration, Parks and Recreation, Community Economic Development, Public Works, Police, and other fees.

Willdan Financial Services has completed a User Fee Study (“Study”) and an updated comprehensive fee schedule for City Council consideration. The new fee schedule was created only after determining the fully burdened cost for city personnel involved in providing certain services. By taking the fully burdened salary and benefit costs for employees in each department and then determining the amount of time it typically takes to provide certain service, WFS was able to determine the appropriate cost for certain user services.

ANALYSIS:

Fees in California are required to conform to the statutory requirements of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, and the California Code of Regulations (“Code”). The Code requires that the City Council adopt fees by either Ordinance or Resolution.

The last time the City performed a user fee study was nearly 10 years ago. Since that time, the City had not conducted a user fee study to determine if the current fee structure was in 62 alignment with the full cost of providing such services. In order to determine the full cost of providing various city services and determine the appropriate fee level and recovery rates, WFS was awarded a contract. The study was a coordinated effort between City departments.

Throughout the process, several meetings were held between Willdan, City staff, and City management to review status updates and provide direction. In addition, a user fee study workshop was held with City staff and the City Council, during a special meeting on July 2, 2025 to discuss the recommended fee changes.

At the user fee study workshop, items that were discussed included, but were not limited to, the following:

Administration
An increase to 4 fees
3 fees would decrease
6 new document/printing/copying fees will be added
4 fees would remain as currently set
Finance
An increase to 6 fees
7 fees would remain as currently set
Public Works
An increase to 10 fees
1 fee would decrease
32 new fees would be added
7 fees would change to deposit based or current market price from a flat fee 47 fees would remain as currently set
Planning
An increase to 55 fees
7 fees would decrease
2 new fees would be added
19 fees would remain as currently set
Building And Safety
An increase to 205 fees and the Building Permit fees
10 fees would decrease
Technology fee will change to a percentage based from a per building valuation fee 9 fees would remain as currently set
Police
An increase to 12 fees
2 fees would decrease
16 fees would remain as currently set
Parks & Recreation
An increase to 27 fees
3 fees would decrease
32 new fees will be added
9 fees would remain as currently set
63 During the study session Council requested staff provided clarification on the following items:

Provide information on when a home occupation permit requires an inspection.

Response: If the business type has potential for traffic, noise, environmental or parking impacts. As most home businesses are office/service based, they rarely require an inspection.

Include language regarding reserve officer costs in fee schedule.

Response: As Reserve Officers are not full time employees, they do not have a fully burdened cost. However, a footnote has been included in the fee schedule to reflect their availability for services.

Quantify the value of Category 2 user subsidies and costs to the City.

Response: Parks & Recreation staff will return to Council to provide further analysis of Category 2 user subsidy impacts.

Compare fees to other cities.

Response: Staff will have comparisons of other municipalities fees to share at the October 15th meeting, should Council be interested.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

1. Approval of this item moves the City closer to completing City Council’s two-year Strategic Plan, Section Economic Development, Objective #B1, Revenue Opportunities, by properly reflecting and recouping the cost of City services.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

Willdan provided a revenue analysis in the report that was intended to provide additional context as a projection of what the fee changes will mean in revenues, assuming no participation changes in service requests. The projections are based on the average fee change for each department and evaluates the projected revenue change resulting from suggested fees. The chart below does not include the revenue effect of new (additional) fees:

Department/Fund FY 24/25 User Fee Revenue Projected Revenue Change 100: COMM & ECON DEV 1,150,245 $171,211
100: FINANCE 9 ,362 $1,474
100: PARKS & RECREATION 53,037 $10,721
100: POLICE 56,320 $26,037
620: WATER 30,361 -$3,101
OPTIONS:

ATTACHMENTS:

Reso_7595 - Fee Study Analysis.docx
City of Santa Paula UF Report 10.9.25.pdf
64 RESOLUTION NO. 7595

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA

TO APPROVE THE FULL COST ANALYSIS OF USER FEES PREPARED BY

WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES AND AMEND AND AUGMENT THE CITY

OF SANTA PAULA FEE SCHEDULE
The City Council for the City of Santa Paula does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. The Government Code of the State of California establishes procedures and criteria for the imposition of fees by local agencies.

B. The City of Santa Paula provides a variety of services to the General Public and Other Governmental Agencies.

C. The City desires to recover direct and indirect management support costs associated with the costs of providing services.

D. The City completed a comprehensive independent Cost Recovery Study (“Study”) dated October 9, 2025.

E. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

SECTION 2: A noticed public hearing has been conducted in accordance with California law prior to adoption of this Resolution which amends fees for various services as detailed in Exhibit A of this Resolution.

SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Santa Paula has resolved that the fees as shown in Exhibit A, are hereby adopted and will become effective as of January 1, 2026; and that beginning July 1, 2026 and on the first day of each July thereafter, the fees shall be increased by the prior calendar year’s Annual Average Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles Region so long as the adjustment does not exceed the cost for providing the services and is approved by the City Council.
.

SECTION 4: Certain types of applications, as noted in Exhibit A, will be processed via the City’s deposit system. Further, in special circumstances, the Department Head of the applicable Department may exercise the right to use the deposit system in lieu of standard service fees at their sole discretion.

SECTION 5: City Council finds and determines that the fees for services and the billing and overhead rates established by this Resolution do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of services and otherwise comply with the provisions of California law.

This finding is based on all oral and written evidence prepared by and presented to the City, including but not limited to, the Study prepared for the City with input from all affected departments.

SECTION 6: CEQA. The City Council hereby finds that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the adoption of this 65 Resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 7: The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City, and make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the record of proceedings of the City Council in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.

PASSED, AND ADOPTED, this 15th day of October, 2025.
_____________________
Pedro Chavez, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
_______________________________
Monica Castillo, City Attorney
Approved as to content:
_______________________________
Dan Singer, City Manager
66 EXHIBIT A
67 City of Santa Paula
User Fee Study
October 9, 2025
68 i Comprehensive User Fee Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. i Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 1 User Fee Background ............................................................................................... 2 Background .................................................................................................................................................. 2 California User Fee History .......................................................................................................................... 2 Additional Policy Considerations ................................................................................................................. 3 Study Objective ....................................................................................................... 4 Scope of the Study ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Aim of the Report......................................................................................................................................... 5 Project Approach and Methodology ........................................................................... 6 Conceptual Approach................................................................................................................................... 6 Fully Burdened Hourly Rates........................................................................................................................ 6 Summary Steps of the Study ........................................................................................................................ 7 Allowable Costs ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Quality Control/Quality Assurance .............................................................................................................. 8 Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees............................................................................. 8 City Staff Contributions ................................................................................................................................ 9 Santa Paula User Fees ............................................................................................ 10 Cost Recovery............................................................................................................................................. 10 Subsidization .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Revenue Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Impact on Demand (Elasticity) ................................................................................................................... 11 Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 11 Administrative Services .......................................................................................... 13 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 Finance ................................................................................................................ 14 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 Public Works ......................................................................................................... 15 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 69 ii Comprehensive User Fee Study
Planning ............................................................................................................... 16 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 Building and Safety ................................................................................................ 17 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 Police .................................................................................................................. 19 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 Parks And Recreation ............................................................................................. 20 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered .................................................. 21 Appendix B –Fully Burdened Hourly Rates ................................................................ 22 Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis ....................................................................... 26 70 1 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Executive Summary
The City of Santa Paula engaged Willdan Financial Services (Willdan) to determine the full costs incurred by the City to support the various activities for which the City charges user fees. Due to the complexity and the breadth of performing a comprehensive review of fees, Willdan employed a variety of fee methodologies to identify the full costs of individual fee and program activities. This report and the appendices herein identify 100% full cost recovery for City services. Appendix C details the full cost and suggested fees as determined through discussion with departmental staff. The recommended fees identified herein are either at or less than full cost recovery.

71 2 Comprehensive User Fee Study
User Fee Background
Background
As part of a general cost recovery strategy, local governments adopt user fees to fund programs and services that provide limited or no direct benefit to the community as a whole (“User Fees”). As cities struggle to maintain levels of service and variability of demand, they have become increasingly aware of subsidies provided by the General Fund and have implemented cost-recovery targets. To the extent that governments use general tax monies to provide individuals with private benefits, and not require them to pay the full cost of the service (and, therefore, receive a subsidy), the government is limiting funds that may be available to provide other community-wide benefits. In effect, the government is using community funds to pay for private benefits. Unlike most revenue sources, cities have more control over the level of user fees they charge to recover costs, or the subsidies they can institute.

Fees in California are required to conform to the statutory requirements of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, Proposition 26, and the California Code of Regulations. The Code also requires that the City Council adopt fees by either ordinance or resolution, and that any fees in excess of the estimated total cost of rendering the related services must be approved by a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting because the charge would be considered a tax and not a fee. There are no fees suggested to be set above the cost of service and as such a public vote is not required.

California User Fee History
Before Proposition 13, in times of fiscal shortages, California cities were able to raise property taxes, which funded everything from police and recreation to development-related services. However, this situation changed with the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978.

Proposition 13 established the era of revenue limitation in California local government. In subsequent years, the state saw a series of additional limitations to local government revenues. Proposition 4 (1979) defined the difference between a tax and a fee: a fee can be no greater than the cost of providing the service; and Proposition 218 (1996) further limited the imposition of taxes for certain classes of fees. As a result, cities were required to secure a supermajority vote in order to enact or increase taxes. Due to the thresholds needed to increase local taxes, cities have less control and very few successful options for new revenues.

The State of California took a series of actions in the 1990’s and 2000’s to improve the State’s fiscal situation, at the expense of local governments. In 2004-05, the Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (“ERAF”) take-away of property taxes and the reduction of Vehicle License Fees further reduced local tax revenues.

In addition, on November 2, 2010, California voters approved Proposition 26, the “Stop Hidden Taxes Initiative”, which is aimed at defining “regulatory fees” as a special tax rather than a fee, thus requiring approval by two-thirds vote of local voters. These regulatory fees are typically intended to mitigate the societal and environmental impacts of a business or person’s activities. Proposition 26 contains seven categories of exceptions. The fees analyzed as part of a User Fee study typically fall under categories one through five consisting of charges for specific benefits, government service, regulatory need, for use of government property, or a fine/penalty.
72 3 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Additional Policy Considerations
State regulations require that municipalities update their fee schedules to reflect the actual costs of certain public services primarily benefiting users. User Fees recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby typically reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes.

In addition to collecting the direct cost of labor and materials associated with processing and administering user services, it is common for local governments to recover reasonable support costs. Support costs are those costs relating to a local government’s central service departments that are allocable to the local government’s operating departments. Central services support cost allocations were incorporated using the resulting indirect overhead percentages determined through the Cost Allocation Plan. This plan was developed prior to the User Fee study to determine the burden placed upon central services by the operating departments in order to allocate a proportionate share of central service cost.

As labor effort and costs associated with the provision of services fluctuate over time, a significant element in the development of any fee schedule is that it has the flexibility to remain current. Therefore, it is recommended that the City include an inflationary factor in the resolution adopting the fee schedule to allow the City to annually increase or decrease the fees by changes in a pre-approved inflationary index, as described below. However, such inflationary increases shall not exceed the reasonable estimated cost of providing the services each year.

The City may employ many different inflationary factors. The most commonly used inflator is some form of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as it is widely well known and accepted. A similar inflator is the implicit price deflator for GDP, which is much like the CPI except that while the CPI is based on the same “basket” of goods and services every year, the price deflators’ “basket” can change year to year. Since the primary factor for the cost of a City’s services is usually the costs of the personnel involved, tying an inflationary factor that connects more directly to the personnel costs can also be suitable if there is a clear method, or current practice of obtaining said factor.

Each City should use an inflator that they believe works the best for their specific situation and needs but cannot rely solely on the CPI increase as it is incumbent upon each agency to ensure the amount of the fees charged does not exceeds the reasonable estimated costs of providing the services. It is also recommended that the City perform this internal review annually with a comprehensive review of services and fees performed every five years, which would include adding, amending, or removing fees for programs/services.
73 4 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Study Objective
As the City of Santa Paula seeks to efficiently manage limited resources and adequately respond to increased service demands, it needs a variety of tools. A User Fee Study provides assurance that the City has the best information and the best resources available to make sound decisions, fairly and legitimately set fees, maintain compliance with state law and local policies, and meet the needs of the City administration and its constituency. Given the limitations on raising revenue in local government, the City recognizes that a User Fee Study is a very cost-effective way to understand the total cost of services and identify potential fee deficiencies. Essentially, a User Fee is a payment for a requested service provided by a local government that primarily benefits an individual or group.

The total cost of each service included in this analysis is based on the full cost of providing City services, including direct salaries and benefits of City staff, direct departmental costs, and indirect costs from central service support. This study determines the full cost recovery fee for the City to provide each service; however, each fee is set at the City’s discretion, up to 100% of the total cost, as specified in this report.

The principal goal of the study was to help the City determine the full cost of the services that the City provides. In addition, Willdan established a series of additional objectives including:
 Developing a rational basis for setting fees
 Identifying subsidy amount, if applicable, of each fee in the model  Ensuring compliance with State law
 Developing an updatable and comprehensive list of fees  Maintaining accordance with City policies and goals
The study results will help the City better understand its true costs of providing services and may serve as a basis for making informed policy decisions regarding the most appropriate fees, if any, to collect from individuals and organizations that require individualized services from the City.

Scope of the Study
The scope of this study encompasses a review and calculation of the user fees charged by the following Santa Paula departments and fee groups:
 Administrative Services
 Finance
 Public Works
 Planning
 Building and Safety
 Police
 Parks and Recreation
74 5 Comprehensive User Fee Study
The study involved the identification of existing and potential new fees, fee schedule restructuring, data collection and analysis, orientation and consultation, quality control, communication and presentations, and calculation of individual service costs (fees) or program cost recovery levels.

Aim of the Report
The User Fee Study focused on the cost of City services, as City staff currently provide them at existing, known, or reasonably anticipated service and staff level needs. This report provides a summary of the study results, and a general description of the approach and methods Willdan and City staff used to determine the recommended fee schedule. The report is not intended to document all of the numerous discussions throughout the process, nor is it intended to provide an influential dissertation on the qualities of the utilized tools, techniques, or alternative approaches.

75 6 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Project Approach and Methodology
Conceptual Approach
The basic concept of a User Fee Study is to determine the “reasonable cost” of each service provided by the City for which it charges a user fee. The full cost of providing a service may not necessarily become the City’s fee, but it serves as the objective basis as to the maximum amount that may be collected.

The standard fee limitation established in California law for such fees is the “estimated, reasonable cost” principle. In order to maintain compliance with the letter and spirit of this standard, every component of the fee study process included a related review. The use of budget figures, time estimates, and improvement valuation clearly indicates reliance upon estimates for some data.

Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is primarily based on the Fully Burdened Hourly Rates (FBHRs) that were determined for City personnel directly involved in providing services. The FBHRs include not only personnel salary and benefits (see Appendix B), but also any costs that are reasonably ascribable to personnel. The cost elements that are included in the calculation of fully burdened rates are:
 Salaries & benefits of personnel involved
 Operating costs applicable to fee operations
 Departmental support, supervision, and administration overhead  Indirect City-wide overhead costs
An important factor in determining the fully burdened rate is in the calculation of productive hours for personnel. This calculation takes the available workable hours in a year of 2,080 and adjusts this figure to 1,650 productive or billable hours to account for calculated or anticipated hours’ employees are involved in non-billable activities such as paid vacation, sick leave, holidays, and other considerations as necessary.

Dividing the full cost, including overhead, of a position by the number of productive hours provides the FBHR.

The FBHRs are then used in conjunction with time estimates, when appropriate for how a service is provided, to calculate a fee’s cost based on the personnel and the amount of their time that is involved in providing each service.
76 7 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Summary Steps of the Study
The process of the study is straightforward and simple in concept. The following list provides a summary of the study process steps:

Allowable Costs
This report identifies three types of costs that, when combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a service (Appendix A). Costs are defined as
direct labor, including salary and benefits,
departmental overhead costs, and the City’s
central services overhead, where
departmental and central service overhead
costs constitute support costs. These cost
types are defined as follows:
 Direct Labor (Personnel Costs): The
costs related to staff salaries for
time spent directly on fee-related
services.
 Departmental Overhead: A
proportional allocation of
departmental overhead costs,
including operation costs such as
supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function.  Central Services Overhead: These costs represent services provided by those Central Services Departments whose primary function is to support other City departments.

Data Analysis
Department Interviews
Time Estimates
Labor Costs
Indirect Support
Building Cost Layers
Direct Services
Indirect Services
Department Overhead
City-Wide Overhead
Set Fees
Define the Full Cost of
Services
Set Cost Recovery Policy
77 8 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Methodology
The three methods of analysis for calculating fees used in this report are the:

Case Study Method (Standard Unit Cost Build-Up Approach): This approach estimates the actual labor and material costs associated with providing a unit of service to a single user. This analysis is suitable when City staff time requirements do not vary dramatically for a service, or for special projects where the time and cost requirements are easy to identify at the project’s outset. Further, the method is effective in instances when a staff member from one department assists on an application, service or permit for another department on an as-needed basis. Costs are estimated based upon interviews with City staff regarding the time typically spent on tasks, a review of available records, and a time and materials analysis.

Program Cost Approach: In some instances, the underlying data is not available or varies widely, leaving a standard unit cost build-up approach impractical. In addition, market factors and policy concerns (as opposed to actual costs) tend to influence rental based fee levels more than other types of services. Willdan employed a different methodology where appropriate to fit a programs’ needs and goals. Typical programmatic approach cases are valuation-based fees, Recreation programs, and instances where a program cost is divided over the user base to obtain a per applicant cost for shared cost services.

Valuation Based Fees: This manner of collection is used when the valuation of the improvement can be used as a proxy for the amount of effort it would take for City staff to complete the service provided. More specifically, this approach is commonly used for certain User Fees in the Building Division. It is generally accepted that as a project’s size scales up, the cost of the project increases, and the amount of effort needed to review and inspect also increases. Using a valuation-based fees provides for a system that can adjust as project sizes scale. Land is not included in the valuation.

Quality Control/Quality Assurance
All study components are interrelated, thus flawed data at any step in the process will cause the ultimate results to be inconsistent and unsound. The elements of our Quality Control process for User Fee calculations include:
 Involvement of knowledgeable City staff
 Clear instructions and guidance to City staff
 Reasonableness tests and validation
 Internal and external reviews
 Cross-checking
Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees
Within the fee tables in Appendix C, the differences are identified between the full costs calculated through the study and the fee levels currently in effect. The reasons for differences between the two can arise from a number of possible factors including:
78 9 Comprehensive User Fee Study
 Previous fee levels may have been set at levels less than full cost intentionally, based on policy decisions
 Position staffing levels, seniority, and the positions that complete fee and service activity may vary from when the previous costs were calculated
 Personnel and materials costs could have increased at levels that differed from any inflationary factors used to increase fees since the last study
 Changes in processes and procedures within a department, or the City as a whole  Changes in the demand for services in a City may have also changed the staffing or cost structure of departments over time
City Staff Contributions
As part of the study process, Willdan received tremendous support and cooperation from City staff, which contributed and reviewed a variety of components to the study, including:
 Budget and other cost data
 Staffing structures
 Fee and service structures, organization, and descriptions  Direct work hours (billable/non-billable)
 Time estimates to complete work tasks
 Review of draft results and other documentation
A User Fee Study requires significant involvement of the managers and line staff from the departments on top of their existing workloads and competing priorities. The contributions from City staff were critical to this study. We would like to express our appreciation to the City and its staff for their assistance, professionalism, positive attitudes, helpful suggestions, responsiveness, and overall cooperation. 79 10 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Santa Paula User Fees
Cost Recovery
The cost recovery models, by department/division fee type, are presented in detail in Appendix C. Full cost recovery is determined by summing the estimated amount of time each position (in increments of minutes or hours) spends to render a service. Time estimates for each service rendered were obtained through interviews conducted with City staff for each department/division fee included in the study. The resulting cost recovery amount represents the total cost of providing each service. The City’s current fee being charged for each service, if applicable, is provided in this section, as well, for reference.

It is important to note that the time data used to determine the amount of time each employee spends assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essential in identifying the total cost of providing each service and will differ from City to City depending on staffing, positions involved, experience of staff, the use of consultants, and the policies and procedures in place for each City.

Specifically, in providing services, a number of employees are often involved in various aspects of the process, spending anywhere from a few minutes to several hours on the service.

The primary goal of this study was to identify the cost of City services, to provide information to help the City make informed decisions regarding the actual fee levels and charges. The responsibility of determining the final fee levels is a complicated task. City staff must consider many issues in formulating recommendations, and the City Council must consider those same issues and more in making the final decisions.

City staff assumes the responsibility to develop specific fee level recommendations to present to the City Council. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules to guide the City, since many of the considerations are based on the unique characteristics of the City of Santa Paula, and administrative and political discretion. However, in setting the level of full cost recovery for each fee, one should consider whether the service solely benefits one end user or the general community.

Subsidization
Recalling the definition of a user fee helps guide decisions regarding subsidization. The general standard is that individuals (or groups) who receive a wholly private benefit should pay 100% of the full cost of the services. In contrast, services that are simply public benefit should be funded entirely by the general fund’s tax dollars. Unfortunately, for the decision makers, some services fall into the range between these two extremes.

Further complicating the decision, opponents of fees often assert that the activities subject to the fees provide economic, cultural, “quality of life,” or other community benefits that exceed the costs to the City, but it is important to distinguish the difference between any purported possible benefits that may be conveyed through the result of activities of the service receiver and the direct benefit being conveyed through the City providing the service to the requestor.

It is recommended the City consider such factors during its deliberations regarding appropriate fee levels. 80 11 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Of course, subsidization can be an effective public policy tool since it can be used to reduce fees to encourage certain activities (such as to ensure public safety) or allow some people to be able to afford to receive services they otherwise could not at the full cost. In addition, subsidies can be an appropriate and justifiable action, such as to allow citizens to rightfully access services, without overburdensome costs.

Despite the intent, it is important for the City and public to understand that subsidies must be covered by another revenue source, typically the General Fund’s other unrestricted funds.

Revenue Analysis
The revenue analysis of this User Fee Study Report is intended to provide additional context as a projection of what the fee changes will have in revenue, assuming no participation changes in service requests. The projections are based on the average fee change for each department and evaluates the projected revenue change resulting from suggested fees.

Impact on Demand (Elasticity)
Economic principles of elasticity suggest that increased costs for services (higher fees) will eventually curtail the demand for the services; whereas lower fees may spark an incentive to utilize the services and encourage certain actions. Either of these conditions may be a desirable effect to the City. However, the level of the fees that would cause demand changes is largely unknown. The cost of service study did not attempt to evaluate the economic or behavioral impacts of higher or lower fees; nevertheless, the City should consider the potential impacts of these issues when deciding on fee levels.

Summary
City staff is recommending setting user fees at suggested fee amounts as detailed in Appendix C. City and departmental goals, City Council priorities, policy initiatives, past performance, implementation issues, and other internal and external factors should influence staff recommendations and City Council decisions. In this case, the proper identification of additional services (new or existing services) and the update to a consistent and comprehensive fee schedule were the primary objectives of this study. City staff has reviewed the full costs and identified the recommended fee levels for consideration by City Council.

Estimated Revenue Change
Department/Fund
FY 24/25
User Fee
Revenue
Projected
Revenue
Change
100: COMM & ECON DEV 1,150,245 $171,211
100: FINANCE 9,362 $1,474
100: PARKS & RECREATION 53,037 $10,721
100: POLICE 56,320 $26,037
620: WATER 30,361 -$3,101
*Does not include revenue effect of new fees
81 12 Comprehensive User Fee Study
The following sections provide background for each department, division, and fee group and the results of this study’s analysis of their fees. For the full list of each fee’s analysis, refer to Appendix C of this report. 82 13 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Administrative Services
Administrative Services fees include services provided by the City Manager Department and its subsequent offices such as the City Attorney and City Clerk. Responsibilities of the Department include:

Personnel/Employee Relations, Risk Management, Information Technology Systems, public information and outreach, policy development and legislative advocacy, grant management, and retention of all city records and Municipal Elections.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Administrative Services Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of the Administrative services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach for fees, excluding fees set by the State, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved with providing the service to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that current fees are not in line with the full cost of providing services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 4 fees;
 3 fees would decrease;
 6 new document printing/copying fees will be added;
 4 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be a decrease of 11% for current fees. 83 14 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Finance
The Finance Department is responsible for establishing and maintaining an effective financial accounting system that accurately reflects the City’s financial operations and provides a framework for financial planning and analysis.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Finance Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The services listed under Finance services consist of a few flat cost-based fees, City Animal Regulating fees set by County of Ventura, and others set by the State. The analysis of the cost-based services relied upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that current fees are below the full cost of providing service. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 5 fees;
 9 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 10% for current fees. 84 15 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Public Works
The Public Works Department is a highly trained, dedicated, and responsive service-oriented organization.

It consists of the following service divisions: Administration and Engineering, Fleet, Streets, Water, Wastewater (contract), and Solid Waste (contract).

The Public Works Department is responsible for the City’s street system, including roads, parking lots, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, traffic control devices, streetlights, storm drains, flood control facilities, and bridges; Hillsborough Open Space District; Geological Hazard Abatement District; potable water system; wastewater collection system and associated treatment works (Water Recycling Facility); and fleet maintenance. The Department also administers the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), including the Pavement Management Plan (PMP) and water and sewer repair and replacement programs. Public Works provides support services to the Community and Economic Development Department, which reviews private land development projects on behalf of Public Works for grading, drainage, water, sewer, and street improvements.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Public Works Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of the Public Works services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach for fees, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved with providing the service to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that current fees are currently below the full cost of providing services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 an increase to 10 fees;
 1 fee would decrease;
 47 fees would remain as currently set;
 7 fees would change to deposit based or current market price from a flat fee;  32 new fees will be added, and;
 the average estimated fee increase would be around 49% for current fees. 85 16 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Planning
The Planning Division establishes and implements current and future land use policies and regulations for Santa Paula through land use regulation activities. This authority is derived from the City’s power to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community.

The Planning Division consists of four staff members, with day-to-day management overseen by the Planning & Economic Development Manager. This manager handles departmental functions, maintains planning files, assigns staff projects, and ensures compliance with state, regional, and local mandated planning programs and regulations. The division is supported by an Associate Planner, an Assistant Planner, and a Community Development Technician
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Planning Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Planning services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most of the current fees are underfunding the cost of most of the services.

Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 55 fees;
 7 fees would decrease;
 2 new fees will be added;
 19 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 8% for current fees. 86 17 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Building and Safety
The Building and Safety Division oversees the planning, construction, maintenance, and alterations of all structures and buildings on private property to ensure the safety and well-being of citizens and visitors while increasing property values in the City. Responsibilities include reviewing plans for compliance with national, state, and local codes; issuing building, plumbing, electrical, and mechanical permits; conducting inspections during construction; performing emergency inspections; maintaining building records and plans; and administering general building and construction information.

The Code Compliance team, operating within the Building & Safety Division, maintains and improves the quality of Santa Paula’s neighborhoods by ensuring public compliance with the City’s Municipal Code. The team responds to complaints regarding potential violations of Municipal, Building, Zoning, and Health and Safety Codes, initiating fair and unbiased enforcement actions to correct violations and educating property owners to maintain code compliance
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Building and Safety Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Building and Safety services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff and pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services.

Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that services are currently set below the full cost of providing them. It is recommended that the City increase cost recovery at or near 100% for Building and Safety services as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 205 fees, including Building Permit fees;  10 fees would decrease;
 Technology fee will change to a percentage based from a per building valuation fee;  9 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 18% for current fees.

In addition to the above referenced fees listed under Building, the Building Permit fees are also provided by this division. For the Building Permit fees, valuation is used as a proxy for measuring the effort needed to provide services on a case-by-case basis. This method is an industry standard widely used by other jurisdictions to evaluate the cost of providing service. It is generally understood that the larger and more complex a project is, the more time and effort that is required to provide the service. Project valuation also follows that trend. By using a combination of either project valuation or historical revenue figures along with a multiplier or cost recovery analysis for historical and anticipated future trends, current cost recovery along with variability in charges due to project type and scale is determined. The result of the cost analysis completed for the Building Permit program found that the program is currently operating at 84% cost 87 18 Comprehensive User Fee Study
recovery based on past activity levels. Staff is recommending that the fees be increased to 100% cost recovery.
88 19 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Police
The Police Department is responsible for ensuring public safety and protecting life and property in the City of Santa Paula. It provides a comprehensive range of law enforcement services within the city’s jurisdiction.

Led by Interim Chief of Police Don Aguilar and his executive staff, the department consists of 31 sworn officers, 1 reserve police officer, 7 professional supporting staff, 3 part-time supporting staff, and several volunteers. The department is actively recruiting additional full-time police officers, dispatchers, and community service officers.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Police Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Police services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most of the current fees are underfunding the cost of providing most services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 12 fees;
 2 fees would decrease;
 16 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 46%.

89 20 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Parks And Recreation
The Parks and Recreation Department oversees the administration of the Santa Paula Community Center, Recreation & Community Services, Senior Services, Santa Paula Train Depot, Union Oil Building, Boys & Girls Club Building, Park Maintenance, Buildings and Grounds Maintenance, and the Graffiti Abatement Program.

The Parks and Recreation Department manages the maintenance of all City parks, the bike trail, and city buildings. It also oversees the scheduling and usage of 10 city athletic fields and two shared athletic fields, five of which are lighted.

The Parks & Recreation Department oversees recreation and community services programs, activities, and special events for all residents. The department provides centralized information and support for facility rentals, sports field reservations, jolly jump permits, class and activity registration, senior programs and referrals, department-sponsored special events, youth and adult sports leagues, preschool programs, the Santa Paula Proud volunteer program, and citywide special event and filming permits.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Parks and Recreation Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of most Parks and Recreation programs encompassed facility rentals and other recreation services. The fee for use for government owned facilities and property can be set discretionally by the City, typically based on past usage characteristics, policy goals, and surrounding jurisdiction comparison. The cost of capital acquisition, maintenance, repair, and upgrade to the City and subsequently the public is offset through rental or use fees. As such these fees should be set using the knowledge of activity use for the facilities, policy desires of the City, and market factors when desirable. It is generally accepted that some Parks and Recreation programs provide a measure of public benefit to the residents and City as a whole, and as such is it common for services to bear significant subsidies. In addition, cities generally want to ensure that their programs and services remain affordable to the community at large, and that the programs remain competitive with surrounding jurisdictions. For a few of the fees in Community Services a standard cost of service approach was used, but some of the additional cost considerations above were not included as this is primarily an operational cost analysis study that does not include considerations for capital. The analysis found that the current fees for facility use and services are below the cost of providing them. The analysis also included a cost recovery analysis for Communtiy Servies as a whole and it was determined to be operating at around 2% cost recovery. The suggested fees detailed in Appendix C. would result in:
 An increase for 27 fees;
 3 fees would decrease;
 32 new fees will be added, and;
 9 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 20%.
90 21 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered
Below are the total allowable costs that may be recovered through User Fees; however, only a portion of the total allowable cost is recovered as staff not only works on services related to User Fees, but also works on an array of other City functions during the operational hours of the City. The amounts listed below will not reconcile to City budgets as costs that should not be included in overhead for personnel in the application of determining fully burdened hourly rates were excluded. Examples of these costs are capital, debt, monetary transfers, contract costs, and any other costs that are charged directly to the service requestor.

City of Santa Paula- User Fee
Overhead Rate Calculations
Department
Total
Personnel
Services
Department
Operations &
Administration
Direct
Overhead
%
Indirect
Allocation
%
100: C.S.-BUILDING MAINT 340,503 132,341 39% 0%
100: CITY CLERK 102,924 52,965 51% 0%
100: CITY MANAGER 497,041 92,336 19% 0%
100: COMM & ECON DEV 1,326,911 71,653 5% 38%
100: FINANCE 580,355 133,500 23% 0%
100: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 308,178 156,300 51% 0%
100: PARKS & RECREATION 1,629,799 443,244 27% 35%
100: POLICE 8,078,085 1,022,864 13% 32%
206: STORMWATER PROGRAM 88,846 4,328 5% 25%
610: SEWER 405,866 204,883 50% 9%
620: WATER 2,631,377 1,328,567 50% 15%
702: EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 329,331 59,930 18% 0%
91 22 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix B –Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
Below are fully burdened hourly rates of staff positions that provide for the services detailed in Appendix C. The FBHRs were used to determine the full cost of each service. They include the salary and benefit costs for each position as well as all applicable overhead amounts for each position. When a central service department position works on a fee or project in the purview of an operating department, the overhead rates of the operating department (shown in Appendix A) will be applied to that central service positions’ salary and benefit rate for full cost recovery since indirect overhead cost only applies to non-central service functions of the City. For any user fee service request that is outside the scope of the fees detailed in Appendix C, or for services for which there is no fee currently set, the City can charge up to the full cost of the FBHR for personnel involved.
92 23 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Santa Paula- User Fee
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
100: CITY CLERK Clerk - CITY CLERK $129.02
100: CITY MANAGER CM - CITY MANAGER $280.20
100: CITY MANAGER CM - DCM $187.03
100: CITY MANAGER CM - EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT $73.07
100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I $95.85 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $80.76 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - BUILDING INSPECTOR I $100.79 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL $172.99 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTOR $110.67 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICIAN $96.52 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - MANAGEMENT ANALYST $148.76 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - PERMIT TECHNICIAN $112.38 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - PLANNER, ASSISTANT/GIS ANALYST $126.00 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - PLANNER, ASSOCIATE $141.58 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - PLANNING DIRECTOR $255.85 100: COMM & ECON DEV Com/Econ Dev - PLANNING MANAGER $193.13 702: EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE Equip Maint - FLEET SUPERVISOR $100.66 702: EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE Equip Maint - MECHANIC II $86.64 100: FINANCE Finance - ACCOUNTANT $111.78
100: FINANCE Finance - ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST $73.89
100: FINANCE Finance - ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR $159.13 100: FINANCE Finance - CUST SERVICES REP $68.03
100: FINANCE Finance - FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY TREASURER $215.70 100: FINANCE Finance - PAYROLL SPECIALIST $82.18
100: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IT - IT MANAGER $248.68
100: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IT - IT SUPPORT ANALYST $140.83 100: C.S.-BUILDING MAINT Maint - ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I $89.79 100: C.S.-BUILDING MAINT Maint - CUSTODIAN $75.77
100: C.S.-BUILDING MAINT Maint - FAC MAINT WRK I $75.77 100: C.S.-BUILDING MAINT Maint - FAC MAINT WRK II $77.16 100: C.S.-BUILDING MAINT Maint - PARKS & FACILITIES SUPERVISOR $119.97 100: PARKS & RECREATION Parks - ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I $111.12 100: PARKS & RECREATION Parks - ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $93.26 100: PARKS & RECREATION Parks - FAC MAINT WRK I $94.13
100: PARKS & RECREATION Parks - FAC MAINT WRK II $91.97 100: PARKS & RECREATION Parks - LEAD PARK AND ABATEMENT SPECIALIST $95.67 100: PARKS & RECREATION Parks - PARKS & FACILITIES SUPERVISOR $148.46 100: PARKS & RECREATION Parks - PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR $293.24 100: PARKS & RECREATION Parks - RECREATION LEADER I / CITY CORP TRAINEE $148.69 100: PARKS & RECREATION Parks - RECREATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR $71.32 100: PARKS & RECREATION Parks - RECREATION SUPERVISOR $147.44 93 24 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Santa Paula- User Fee
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
100: PERS & EMPL REL Pers - HUMAN RESOURCE TECHNICIAN $76.80 100: PERS & EMPL REL Pers - HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST $108.41 100: PERS & EMPL REL Pers - HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $188.14 100: POLICE Police - ANIMAL SERVICES COORDINAT $85.64
100: POLICE Police - COMM SERVICE OFFICER $37.68
100: POLICE Police - COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICE $89.30
100: POLICE Police - EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR $135.42 100: POLICE Police - EVIDENCE & PROPERTY TECHNICIAN $98.82 100: POLICE Police - EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT $74.91
100: POLICE Police - POLICE CADET $29.66
100: POLICE Police - POLICE CHIEF $324.41
100: POLICE Police - POLICE COMMANDER $253.21
100: POLICE Police - POLICE OFFICER $157.15
100: POLICE Police - POLICE SENIOR $178.31
100: POLICE Police - POLICE SERGEANT $205.90
100: POLICE Police - PUB SAFETY DISPATCH SUPER $133.66
100: POLICE Police - PUBLIC SAFETY DISP CLERK $103.62
100: POLICE Police - RECORDS TECHNICIAN $85.95
100: POLICE Police - SR. RECORDS SUPERVISOR $127.58
100: RISK MANAGEMENT Risk - HUMAN RESOURCE TECHNICIAN $69.22 100: RISK MANAGEMENT Risk - HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST $97.72 100: RISK MANAGEMENT Risk - HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $169.58 610: SEWER Sewer - ACCOUNTANT $149.00
610: SEWER Sewer - ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I $106.49
610: SEWER Sewer - ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST II $135.14
610: SEWER Sewer - ASSISTANT PUB WORKS DIRECTOR $256.21 610: SEWER Sewer - ASSOCIATE ENGINEER $191.45
610: SEWER Sewer - MAINTANENCE WRK II $100.96
610: SEWER Sewer - MAINTENANCE WRK I $92.06
610: SEWER Sewer - MANAGEMENT ANALYST $169.69
610: SEWER Sewer - PERMIT TECHNICIAN $124.52
610: SEWER Sewer - PUB WORKS DIR/CITY ENGINE $316.60
610: SEWER Sewer - STREET MAINT LEADWORKER $106.20
206: STORMWATER PROGRAM Storm - ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I $84.85 206: STORMWATER PROGRAM Storm - ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST II $107.69 206: STORMWATER PROGRAM Storm - MANAGEMENT ANALYST $135.22 206: STORMWATER PROGRAM Storm - PUB WORKS DIR/CITY ENGINE $252.28 620: WATER Water - ACCOUNTANT $156.97
620: WATER Water - ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST $115.17
620: WATER Water - ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I $112.18
620: WATER Water - ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST II $142.37
94 25 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Santa Paula- User Fee
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
620: WATER Water - ASSISTANT PUB WORKS DIRECTOR $269.91 620: WATER Water - ASSOCIATE ENGINEER $201.68
620: WATER Water - CUST SERVICES REP $95.95
620: WATER Water - DUAL OPERATOR II $138.94
620: WATER Water - DUAL OPERATOR III $145.50
620: WATER Water - DUAL OPERATOR IV $153.28
620: WATER Water - FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY TREASURER $304.24 620: WATER Water - MAINTANENCE WRK II $106.35
620: WATER Water - MAINTENANCE WRK I $96.98
620: WATER Water - MANAGEMENT ANALYST $178.77
620: WATER Water - PERMIT TECHNICIAN $131.18
620: WATER Water - PUB WORKS DIR/CITY ENGINE $333.53
620: WATER Water - STREET MAINT LEADWORKER $111.87
620: WATER Water - WATER OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT $250.97 95 26 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis
The following tables provide the results of the analysis, resulting full cost recovery amount, and recommended fees. For fees, services, and penalties in which the full cost, existing fee, and suggested fee is listed as “NA”, the amount or percentage was not calculable. This is most common when either the current or the suggested fee includes a variable component that is not comparable on a one-to-one basis, a full cost was not calculated (for penalties, fines, market-based fees, or items not included in the study), or when there is not a current fee amount to compare against. 96 Administrative Services Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Mobile Home Review Services2 Annual Registration Fee $2.00 $890.58 99% $10.00 $83 New Resident Processing Fee $31.25 $37.19 6% $35.00 $44 Application to Increase Rent - City Processing Fee $8,048.00 $8,836.00 0% $8,836.00 $7885 Application to Increase Rent - City Attorney and/or Contract Services Provider Review Actual Cost. $45,000 Initial Deposit NA NA Actual Cost. $0 6 Appeal Fee $5,000.00 deposit $3,022.68 1% $3,000.00 -$2,0007 Document Certification $13.39 $64.51 1% $64.00 $518 Available On-Line: Copies of audio tapes, agendas and minutes for City Council and Planning Commission, Municipal Code Updates Available on- line NA NA Available on- line $0 9 Document Printing/Copying - postage if mailed Postage rate NA NA Postage rate $010 Document Printing/Copying - GIS 2' x 3' $21.42 NA NA $21.42 $011 Document Printing/Copying - 8 1/2 x11 (one sided black ink) New $0.15 0% $0.15 NA12 Document Printing/Copying - 8 1/2 x11 (two sided black ink) New $0.20 0% $0.20 NA13 Document Printing/Copying - 8 1/2 x11 (one sided color ink) New $0.50 0% $0.50 NA14 Document Printing/Copying - 8 1/2 x11 (two sided colorink) New $0.75 0% $0.75 NA15 Document Printing/Copying - up to 2' x 3' New $5.20 0% $5.20 NA16 Document Printing/Copying - greater than 2' x 3' New $6.40 0% $6.40 NA17 Main Street Banner - Up to 5 pairs on street lights $612.22 $203.33 0% $203.00 -$40918 Main Street Banner - Additional pair for street lights $244.89 $203.33 0% $203.00 -$4219 For services requested of City staff which have no fee listed in this fee schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the established hourly rates for this department/division. Additionally, the City will pass-through to the applicant any discrete costs incurred from the use of external service providers if required to process the specific application. 27 97
Finance Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 City Animal Regulation (fees as set by County of Ventura)2 Altered dog license fee County of Ventura NA NA County of Ventura $0 3 Un-altered dog license fee County of Ventura NA NA County of Ventura $0 4 Vendor Permit $21.73 NA NA $21.73 $05 Utility Account Set-up $30.65 $35.48 0% $35.48 $56 Water Disconnect Fee $40.00 Processing from Public Works apply. Regulated by SB998 $201.73 80% $40.00 $07 Water Reconnect Fee $40.00 Processing from Public Works apply. Regulated by SB998 $201.73 80% $40.00 $08 Lien Administrative Service (Per Parcel- placed with lien) $46.86 $55.42 0% $55.42 $99 Lien Administrative Service (Per Parcel-Early Release Requested) $20.86 $36.94 0% $36.94 $1610 Returned Check Processing Fees set by California Civil Code Ch. 522 Sec. 1719. Additional charges may apply if not paid within 30 days of the receipt of the letter. See CA Civil Code Ch. 552 Sec. 1719 11 First item $25.00 NA NA $25.00 $012 Each additional item $35.00 NA NA $35.00 $013 Business License $250.00 per day NA NA $250.00 $014 Business License - Duplicate for Lost License $6.25 $17.74 0% $17.74 $1115 Business License - Transfer of License $6.25 For changes in the name of the business or address changes within City limits the Planning Department may require an additional Inspection fee. $18.47 0% $18.47 $1216 Vendor Permit $22.00 NA NA $22.00 $017 For services requested of City staff which have no fee listed in this fee schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the established hourly rates for this department/division. Additionally, the City will pass-through to the applicant any discrete costs incurred from the use of external service providers if required to process the specific application. 28 98
Public Works Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ1 Development Review Fees2 Planning Application Review 3 Plan & Map Check Initial Submittal for Concept Review 4 Single Dwelling Unit $214.28
Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $7,500.00 Deposit NA
5 Commercial (per unit) $734.66
Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $7,500.00 Deposit NA
6 Multi-Family / Multi-Use $1,163.21
Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $10,000.00 Deposit NA
7 Tentative Map and Plan Checks
County does technical review and City administers the process 8 Engineering Construction Plan Check - Single Dwelling Unit (1-4 parcels) COA'S - 8 - R-2/C-3 R-1/B-3 $1,469.32 Deposit NA NA $1,469.32 Deposit $0 9 Engineering Construction Plan Check - Commercial (per unit) (1-4 parcels) COA'S - 8 - R-2/C- 3 R-1/B-3 $1,469.32 Deposit NA NA $1,469.32 Deposit $0 10 Engineering Construction Plan Check - Multi-Family/Multi-Use COA's 10 $2,448.87 Deposit NA NA $2,448.87 Deposit $011 Engineering Construction Plan Check - Subdivision (5-50 Lots) 12 50 Parcels or less (Per Lot) $15,000.00 Deposit NA NA $15,000.00 Deposit $013 Greater than 50 Parcels (Per Lot) $20,000.00 Deposit NA NA $20,000.00 Deposit $014 EIR Review15 Initial Study $3,673.31 Deposit NA NA $3,673.31 Deposit $016 EIR $9,550.60 Deposit NA NA $9,550.60 Deposit $017 Engineering Submittal Review Fees18 Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Merger19 City Administrative Processing Fee $1,101.99 Deposit NA NA $1,101.99 Deposit $020 County Review Fee Per County Fee Structure Fees apply per county fee structure NA NA Per County Fee Structure $0 21 Parcel Map22 City Administrative Processing Fee $1,591.77 Deposit NA NA $1,591.77 Deposit $023 County Review Fee Per County Fee Structure Fees apply per county fee structure NA NA Per County Fee Structure $0 24 Tract Map25 City Administrative Processing Fee $3,061.09 Deposit NA NA $3,061.09 Deposit $026 County Review Fee Per County Fee Structure Fees apply per county fee structure NA NA Per County Fee Structure $0 27 Subdivision Map Revision28 City Administrative Processing Fee $1,591.77 Deposit NA NA $1,591.77 Deposit $029 County Review Fee Per County Fee Structure Fees apply per county fee structure NA NA Per County Fee Structure $0 30 Subdivision Construction Time Extension $306.11 NA NA $306.11 $031 SWPCP Fee % based on Engineer Cost Estimate
$464.04 NA
$400.00* (Base Fee) Actual Cost is a % based on Engineer Cost Estimate $0
29 99
Public Works Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ32 SWPP Fee % based on Engineer Cost Estimate
$534.54 NA
$400.00* (Base Fee) Actual Cost is a % based on Engineer Cost Estimate $0
33 Soils & Geology Fee New Deposit Consultant Review NA NA $500.00 Deposit NA34 City Administrative Processing Fee $673.44 NA NA $673.44 $035 Improvements Plan Check Fee New Deposit NA NA Engineer Cost Estimate Deposit NA36 Grading Plan Check Fee % based on Engineer Cost Estimate
Deposit NA NA % based on Engineer Cost Estimate Deposit $0 37 General Plan Fee New Deposit NA NA % based on Engineer Cost Estimate Deposit NA38 Grading Permit Issuance Fee New NA NA % based on Engineer Cost Estimate Deposit NA39 Inspection Fees Engineer Cost Estimate Deposit NA NA Engineer Cost Estimate Deposit $0 40 Building Plan Review Fee 41 SFR Addition/Remodel [Within Flood Zone] New Deposit Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $1,500.00 Deposit NA
42 ADU Garage Conversion [Within Flood Zone] New Deposit Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $2,000.00 Deposit NA
43 New Detached ADU [Within Flood Zone] New Deposit
Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $2,000.00 Deposit NA
44 New Attached ADU [Within Flood Zone] New Deposit
Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $3,000.00 Deposit NA
45 New SFR [Within Flood Zone] New Deposit
Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $7,500.00 Deposit NA
46 Commerical Tentant Improvement [Within Flood Zone] New Deposit Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $7,500.00 Deposit NA
47 New Commercial Project [Within Flood Zone] New Deposit Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $15,000.00 Deposit NA
48 SFR Addition/Remodel [Not in Flood Zone] New Deposit Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $600.00 Deposit NA
49 ADU Garage Conversion [Not in Flood Zone] New Deposit Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $600.00 Deposit NA
50 New Detached ADU [Not in Flood Zone] New Deposit
Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $1,000.00 Deposit NA
30 100
Public Works Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ51 New Attached ADU [Not in Flood Zone] New Deposit Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $1,000.00 Deposit NA
52 New SFR [Not in Flood Zone] New Deposit
Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $5,400.00 Deposit NA
53 Commerical Tentant Improvement [Not in Flood Zone] New Deposit Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $4,000.00 Deposit NA
54 New Commercial Project [Not in Flood Zone] New Deposit Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $5,000.00 Deposit NA
55 Subdivisions & large projects FAHR Consultant Review NA NA FAHR $056 Design Plan Review Fee 57 Single Dwelling Unit New Deposit Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $7,500.00 Deposit NA
58 Commercial (per unit) New Deposit
Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $5,000.00 Deposit NA
59 Multi-Family / Multi-Use New Deposit
Base Deposit is shown. Applicant is responsible for actual cost of consultant review NA NA $15,000.00 Deposit NA
60 Encroachment Permits / Miscellaneous Permits61 Public Works Encroachment Permit Issuance $244.89 $262.35 0% $262.00 $1762 Additional Construction Observation Fee $61.22 NA NA $61.22 $063 Public Works Annual Blanket Encroachment Permit Issuance $734.66 $867.40 0% $867.00 $13264 Site Specific Encroachment (Non Annual/Blanket Permit Activity) New Deposit NA NA $1,202.50 Deposit NA65 Per subsequent Permit - Within the Limits of City Excavation Limit $122.44 $262.35 30% $183.00 $6166 Per subsequent Permit - Exceeding Limits of City Excavation Limit $81.63 per 50 l.f.

Code limits excavations to 16 feet in length, or 32 square feet. Any excavation which exceeds the prescribed limits, or street closures, construction projects, or any appurtenant work performed by contractors employed by Southern California Edison shall require a separate standard Encroachment Permit issued by the Santa Paula Public Works Department NA NA $81.63 per 50 l.f. $0
67 Oversize/Overweight Vehicle Permit (Annual) $90.00 NA NA $90.00 $068 Oversize/Overweight Vehicle Permit (Daily) $16.00 NA NA $16.00 $069 Annual Discharge Permit/Monitoring-Significant Ind. Discharger +(Consultant Deposit $2K) $306.11 $2,739.70 83% $459.00 $153 70 Annual Discharge Permit/Monitoring-Other Waste Discharger+(Consultant Deposit $2K) $306.11 $2,739.70 83% $459.00 $15371 Extraterritorial Agreement Application and Processing fee $244.89 Consultant Review NA NA $10,000.00 Deposit $9,75572 Work without a Penalty New NA NA 2 x Permit Cost NA73 Other Engineering/General Field/Admin Services74 Deferred Improvement Agreement Actual Cost NA NA Actual Cost $075 Dedication, Abandonment, and Improvement Agreement Release Actual Cost NA NA Actual Cost $076 Special Traffic/Curb Marking $244.89 $305.00 0% $304.00 $59 Fee is set by the State of California Department of Transportation. The fee is 31 101
Public Works Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ77 Copies of Printed Material78 Postage (less than 2' x 3')79 Postage (greater than 2' x 3')80 2' x 3' Map of streets, street names, city limits, and parcels81 Damage to City Property Actual Cost NA NA Actual Cost $082 Flood Hazard Zone Determination $78.36 $201.68 42% $117.00 $3983 Sale of Plans & Spec Actual Cost NA NA Actual Cost $084 Construction and Demolition Permit $0.00 $464.04 100% $0.00 $085 Work without a Penalty New NA NA 2 x Permit Cost NA86 Public Works: Maintenance Worker $130.00 NA NA $130.00 $087 Water 88 Water Meter Cost (Radio-read meter) - 3/4" $234.00 NA NA Current Market Price NA89 Water Meter Cost (Radio-read meter) - 1" $275.00 NA NA Current Market Price NA90 Water Meter Cost (Radio-read meter) - 1 1/2" $549.00 NA NA Current Market Price NA91 Water Meter Cost (Radio-read meter) - 2" $693.00 NA NA Current Market Price NA92 Water Meter Cost (AMI Smart Meter) - 3" New NA NA Current Market Price NA93 Water Meter Cost (AMI Smart Meter) - 4" New NA NA Current Market Price NA94 Water Meter Cost (AMI Smart Meter) - 6" New NA NA Current Market Price NA95 Water Meter Cost (AMI Smart Meter) - 8" New NA NA Current Market Price NA96 Water Meter Installation Cost - 3/4" to 1" $257.75 Plus Material Costs $270.12 0% $270.00 $1297 Water Meter Installation Cost - 1.5" to 2" $257.75 Plus Material Costs $270.12 0% $270.00 $1298 Water Meter Installation Cost - 3" to 4" $687.35 Plus Material Costs $540.23 0% $540.00 -$14799 Water Meter Installation Cost - 6" to 8" New Plus Material Costs $675.29 0% $675.00 NA100 Water Meter Box Clean Up New It is the responsibility of the customer to have a clean and accessible meter box. We can leave a notice to clean that will trigger a clean up from the water crew if not cleaned within specified time. $540.23 0% $540.00 NA
101 Customer Side Leak New
30 day grace period from day of notice to repair, then daily charge at approximately 1/30th of monthly meter service charge for the respective sized meter with a 30 day penalty limit.

NA NA
$2/day for 3/4" meter. $3/day for 1" meter, $6/day for 1.5" meter, $9/day for 2" meter, $18/day for 3" Meters, $28/day for 4" meter NA
102 Water Service Installation - any size Actual Cost NA NA Actual Cost $0103 Hydrant Installation Actual Cost NA NA Actual Cost $0104 Meter/Hydrant Relocation Actual Cost NA NA Actual Cost $0105 Water Meter Test $85.92 Performed by a third party NA NA Actual Cost $0106 General Service Calls. (turn on/off, checking meter/leak) New $69.47 1% $69.00 NA107 Temporary Water Service - Installation/Removal $128.88 NA NA Actual Cost $0108 Temporary Water Service - Water Usage Deposit $1,071.00 NA NA Actual Cost $0109 Temporary Water Service - Water Usage Charge $38.00 NA NA Actual Cost $0110 Temporary Water Service - Unauthorized Relocation $107.00 NA NA Actual Cost $0111 Temporary Water Service - Water Use $107.00 NA NA Actual Cost $0112 Emergency Call-out Service Actual Cost minimum 2 hour charge NA NA Actual Cost $0 Reference
Administrative
Services Fee
Schedule
32 102
Public Works Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ113 Water Connection Fee - Detached Dwelling Unit114 Water Connection Fee - Attached Dwelling Unit115 Water Connection Fee - Mobile Home Unit116 Water Connection Fee - Commercial Lodging Unit117 Water Connection Fee - Commercial/Office Leases118 Water Connection Fee - Industrial, etc. 119 Water In-Lieu Fee - Single Family Residence - < 1 Acre $4,278.00 NA NA $4,278.00 $0120 Water In-Lieu Fee - Single/Multi Family Residence - >= 1 Acre $5,355.00 NA NA $5,355.00 $0121 Water In-Lieu Fee - Commercial/Industrial $.31 sq.ft. of lot NA NA $.31 sq.ft. of lot $0122 Water In-Lieu Fee - Parkland/Landscape $11,781.00 NA NA $11,781.00 $0123 Water Discontinuance Processing Fee-Delinquency $0.00 Processing fee from Finance applies. Ref Finance Department fee schedule NA NA $0.00 $0 124 Sewer 125 Residential Sewer Connection Fee126 Multifamily/Commercial Connection Fee127 For services requested of City staff which have no fee listed in this fee schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the established hourly rates for this department/division. Additionally, the City will passthrough to the applicant any discrete costs incurred from the use of external service providers if required to process the specific application.

Reference
Development
Impact Mitigation
Fee Update 5/2/16
Reference DIF
update 5/2/16
33 103
Planning Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 1 ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS2 Minor Modification (MM) (includes Time Extensions, may require attorney deposit) - 1st item $3,000.00 Deposit NA NA $3,000.00 Deposit $0 3 each additional item $645.00 $747.98 0% $747.00 $1024 Minor Modification (MM) small project New $1,458.37 0% $1,458.00 NA 5 Airport Land Use Consistency Review $1,500.00 Deposit NA NA $1,600.00 Deposit $1006 Concept Review or Pre-application7 By Staff $2,000.00 Deposit At the discretion of the Planning Director, the fee for Concept Review for large projects with multiple permit requests will be based upon FAHR with a $408 deposit $2,073.93 0% $2,073.00 Deposit $73
8 By Planning Commission $2,000.00 Deposit $2,073.93 0% $2,073.00 Deposit $739 Condo Conversion Review (per unit) $484.00 per Application $604.50 0% $604.00 per Application $120 10 Design Review11 Major: Commercial/Industrial., Multi-Family, $3,000.00 Deposit $3,464.45 0% $3,464.00 Deposit $46412 Minor: SFR brought onto site, Carports, Fences $2,000.00 Deposit NA NA $2,100.00 Deposit $10013 Home Occupation Permit $581.00 per Application Separate Business License and Building and Safety Inspection Fees Apply $205.69 3% $200.00 per Application -$381
14 Landscape Plan Review/Inspection (City processing fee) $1,000.00 Deposit Consultant fees apply separately $1,023.11 2% $1,000.00 Deposit $015 Plan check Review16 Discretionary Approvals-Parcel Map or Tract Maps w/o structures17 Base Fee $1,968.00 per Application $2,046.95 2% $2,000.00 per Application $32 18 Per unit/lot $1,968.00 $2,046.95 2% $2,000.00 $3219 Administrative Approvals greater than 500 sq ft $645.00 $747.98 0% $750.00 $10520 Other changes & new construction less than 500 sq ft $387.00 per Application $400.03 0% $400.00 per Application $13 21 Over the Counter Project Review $129.00 $149.50 0% $149.00 $2022 Additional Fees for 3rd + review $516.00 $640.03 0% $640.00 $12423 Second Unit Permit (Includes Design Review and NLUR) $2,000.00 Deposit NA NA $2,000.00 Deposit $024 Signs25 Sign $500.00 per Sign $261.88 0% $261.00 per Sign -$23926 Master Sign Plan, Amendments to sign plan, monument signs $3,000.00 Deposit NA NA $3,000.00 Deposit $0
27 Temporary Occupancy Permit $806.00 per Application $1,046.97 4% $1,000.00 per Application $194 28 Tree Removal Permit
34 104
Planning Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 29 1-3 trees $581.00 $287.49 0% $287.00 -$29430 each additional tree $645.00 $287.49 0% $287.00 -$35831 Zoning Clearance32 Zoning Clearance $452.00 $574.99 0% $574.00 $12233 Zoning Clearance (new business zoning & parking verification) $323.00 $298.99 0% $298.00 -$25 34 Peddler/Vendor Solicitors Application $774.00 Separate Police and Finance Department Fees may Apply $669.90 0% $669.00 -$105 35 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS36 Annexations $10,000.00 Deposit $12,129.78 0% $12,129.00 Deposit $2,12937 Appeals38 To Planning Commission $4,000.00 Deposit $4,084.35 2% $4,000.00 Deposit $039 To City Council $5,000.00 Deposit $4,084.35 2% $4,000.00 Deposit -$1,00040 Conditional Use Permit (Includes Design Review)41 Major: New Construction, Site Improvements, Sale of Alcohol, Surface Mining $10,000.00 Deposit $11,499.77 0% $11,500.00 Deposit $1,500 42 Minor: Change of Use, Freestanding signs requiring a CUP $4,161.00 Deposit $4,214.76 0% $4,200.00 Deposit $39 43 Density Bonus Review $4,000.00 Deposit $4,214.76 0% $4,200.00 Deposit $20044 Development Agreement $10,000.00 Deposit $12,484.68 0% $12,500.00 Deposit $2,50045 Farm Animal Permit $226.00 $238.38 0% $238.00 $1246 General Plan Amendment $12,000.00 Deposit NA NA $13,500.00 Deposit $1,50047 Growth Management Allocation $1,500.00 Deposit $1,641.75 0% $1,641.00 Deposit $14148 Historic Landmark Certification $1,500.00 Deposit $1,605.88 0% $1,605.00 Deposit $10549 (Certificate of Appropriateness) $1,000.00 Deposit $1,208.45 0% $1,208.00 Deposit $20850 Modification to PD, CUP (MOD) $2,500.00 Deposit $2,645.43 0% $2,645.00 Deposit $14551 Planned Development Permit52 Residential $2,900.00 Deposit NA NA $3,031.00 Deposit $13153 Specific Plan54 Review $15,000.00 Deposit $16,178.67 0% $16,178.00 Deposit $1,17855 Amendment $15,000.00 Deposit $16,178.67 0% $16,178.00 Deposit $1,17856 Temporary Use Permit $800.00 Deposit $873.98 0% $873.00 Deposit $7357 Variance58 Major: Multiple Items. Dev. Stds $6,000.00 Deposit $6,001.89 0% $6,000.00 Deposit $059 Minor: Single Item/Dev. Std. $4,000.00 Deposit $4,599.91 0% $4,599.00 Deposit $59960 Zone Change/ Zoning Text Amendment $8,500.00 Deposit $8,624.83 0% $8,624.00 Deposit $12461 Adult Business62 New/Relocated/Expanded Trans/Suspend/Reinstate $1,500.00 Deposit $1,693.87 0% $1,693.00 Deposit $19363 Annual Renewal of permit $1,000.00 Deposit NA NA $1,150.00 Deposit $15064 New Employee/Annual Renewal Employee $1,000.00 Deposit NA NA $1,150.00 Deposit $15065 Massage Business/Clinics66 Massage Clinic (New / relocated) $1,500.00 Deposit $1,693.87 0% $1,693.00 Deposit $193 35 105
Planning Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 67 Massage Clinic (Renewal) $700.00 Deposit NA NA $815.00 Deposit $11568 Massage Technician Permit (New) $700.00 Deposit NA NA $815.00 Deposit $11569 Massage Technician Permit Renewal $600.00 Deposit NA NA $815.00 Deposit $21570 Outdoor Dining/Café Entertainment (may require Atty dep.) $1,300.00 $1,468.71 0% $1,468.00 $168 71 SUBDIVISION MAP ACT72 Parcel Map $4,500.00 Deposit $5,429.14 0% $5,429.00 Deposit $92973 Tentative or Vesting Tract Map $6,000.00 Deposit $7,919.07 16% $6,639.00 Deposit $63974 Lot Line Adjustment, Reversion to Acreage, Lot Merger, Certificate of Compliance $2,000.00 Deposit $2,103.66 0% $2,103.00 Deposit $103 75 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW76 County of Ventura Filing Fee n/a County establishes fee amount. Passed through to County NA NA n/a $0 77 Categorical Exemption $700.00 Deposit $894.12 0% $894.00 Deposit $19478 Initial Study and Negative Declaration $7,000.00 Deposit Costs of EIR contractor paid separately by applicant. Fee is for City staff review and facilitation $7,009.91 0% $7,000.00 Deposit $0
79 EIR $10,000.00 Deposit $11,224.66 0% $11,224.00 Deposit $1,22480 Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting $2,500.00 Deposit $2,749.47 0% $2,749.00 Deposit $24981 MISCELLANEOUS82 Attorney Fee $1,000.00 Deposit Due to nature of project, Planning Director may require larger deposit. NA NA $1,000.00 Deposit $0 83 Inclusionary Housing Ordinance $800.00 Deposit Due to nature of project, Planning Director may require larger deposit. $1,039.55 0% $1,039.00 Deposit $239 84 Planning Department $129.00 NA NA $129.00 $085 In-Lieu Fee Calculations86 City Architectural Design Review Services per Resolution 6533 $0.00
Resolution 6533 implements City Architectural Review of specific types of projects due to their size and location (see applicable list for projects requiring this review) $0.00 NA $0.00 $0
87 Legal Advertising for Public Hearings $2,000.00 Deposit $2,202.82 0% $2,203.00 Deposit $20388 Legal Advertising Notice for Environmental (ND,MND,EIR) $1,500.00 Deposit $1,564.55 0% $1,564.00 Deposit $64 89 Document Printing/Copying90 Black/white 8 ½ x 11 (10 or less pages)91 Black/white 8 ½ x 11 (additional over 10 pages) Reference
Administrative
Services Fee
Schedule
36 106
Planning Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 92 Black/white 8 ½ X 1493 Black/white 8 ½ x 1794 Maps95 GIS Map 2’x3’96 General Plan Map color 2.5’ x 3’97 General Plan Map color, 11”x 17”98 Zoning Map, color, 11”x 17”99 Documents100 1998 General Plan, bound Available on-line NA NA Available on- line $0 101 1998 General Plan EIR, bound Available on-line NA NA Available on- line $0 102 2012 Housing Element Available on-line NA NA Available on- line $0 103 2004 Development/Zoning Code Available on-line NA NA Available on- line $0 104 Postage-mailing copies Available on-line NA NA Available on- line $0 105 Subscriptions106 Planning Commission Agendas Available on-line NA NA Available on- line $0 107 Planning Commission Minutes Available on-line NA NA Available on- line $0 108 Services provided by department personnel not covered (Per Hour) (2 hour minimum)109 First 2 Hours $258.00 $319.13 0% $319.00 $61110 Each Additional Hour $258.00 $319.13 0% $319.00 $61111 General Plan Maintenance Fee New General Plan, Housing Elelement, Muni -code Update (fee collected by Building & Safety) 6% 1% 6% % of Permit
Fee
NA
112 Site Development Permit New (Ord 1242) $1,200.00 Deposit $1,213.26 0% $1,213.00 Deposit $13113 Construction/Post approval/Phasing (i.e. subdivisions, Spec Plans) $3,000.00 Deposit NA NA $3,000.00 Deposit $0 114 TUP/Stock piling materials $3,200.00 Deposit $3,257.36 0% $3,257.00 Deposit $57115 Legal Advertising for Public hearings (1000 ft radius) $580.00 Deposit $642.65 0% $642.00 Deposit $62116 Mills Act (tax incentives Historic Structures) $2,000.00 Deposit $2,107.38 0% $2,107.00 Deposit $107 Schedule
Reference
Administrative
Services Fee
Schedule
37 107
Planning Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 117
For services requested of City staff which have no fee listed in this fee schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the established hourly rates for this department/division. Additionally, the City will passthrough to the applicant any discrete costs incurred from the use of external service providers if required to process the specific application. 38 108
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 I - Building Permit Fees2 $2,000.00 $461.46 base fee @ $2,000 $550.09 0% $550.00 $893 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $9.44 each add'l $1,000 $11.25 0% $11.25 $24 $25,000.00 $678.61 base fee @ $25,000 $808.95 0% $808.00 $1295 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $30.40 each add'l $1,000 $36.24 0% $36.24 $66 $50,000.00 $1,438.66 base fee @ $50,000 $1,714.98 0% $1,714.00 $2757 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $9.23 each add'l $1,000 $11.00 0% $11.00 $28 $100,000.00 $1,900.11 base fee @ $100,000 $2,265.06 0% $2,265.00 $3659 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $10.86 each add'l $1,000 $12.94 0% $12.94 $210 $500,000.00 $6,243.22 base fee @ $500,000 $7,442.35 0% $7,442.00 $1,19911 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $8.85 each add'l $1,000 $10.55 0% $10.55 $212 $1,000,000.00 $10,667.77 base fee @ $1,000,000 $12,716.70 0% $12,716.00 $2,04813 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $10.67 each add'l $1,000 $12.72 0% $12.72 $214 II - Plan Check Fees15 1 - Plan Review fee for buildings and structures/Licensed16 $2,000.00 $217.16 base fee @ $2,000 $258.86 0% $258.00 $4117 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $8.26 each add'l $1,000 $9.85 0% $9.85 $218 $25,000.00 $407.17 base fee @ $25,000 $485.37 0% $485.00 $7819 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $9.77 each add'l $1,000 $11.65 0% $11.65 $220 $50,000.00 $651.47 base fee @ $50,000 $776.59 0% $776.00 $12521 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $13.03 each add'l $1,000 $15.53 0% $15.53 $322 $100,000.00 $1,302.93 base fee @ $100,000 $1,553.19 0% $1,553.00 $250 39 109
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 23 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $4.07 each add'l $1,000 $4.85 0% $4.85 $124 $500,000.00 $2,931.60 base fee @ $500,000 $3,494.67 0% $3,494.00 $56225 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $2.82 each add'l $1,000 $3.37 0% $3.37 $126 $1,000,000.00 $4,343.11 base fee @ $1,000,000 $5,177.28 0% $5,177.00 $83427 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $4.34 each add'l $1,000 $5.18 0% $5.18 $128 2 - Un-Licensed29 $2,000.00 $461.46 base fee @ $2,000 $550.09 0% $550.00 $8930 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $9.44 each add'l $1,000 $11.25 0% $11.25 $231 $25,000.00 $678.61 base fee @ $25,000 $808.95 0% $808.00 $12932 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $30.40 each add'l $1,000 $36.24 0% $36.24 $633 $50,000.00 $1,438.66 base fee @ $50,000 $1,714.98 0% $1,714.00 $27534 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $9.23 each add'l $1,000 $11.00 0% $11.00 $235 $100,000.00 $1,900.11 base fee @ $100,000 $2,265.06 0% $2,265.00 $36536 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $10.86 each add'l $1,000 $12.94 0% $12.94 $237 $500,000.00 $6,243.22 base fee @ $500,000 $7,442.35 0% $7,442.00 $1,19938 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $8.85 each add'l $1,000 $10.55 0% $10.55 $239 $1,000,000.00 $10,667.77 base fee @ $1,000,000 $12,716.70 0% $12,716.00 $2,04840 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $10.67 each add'l $1,000 $12.72 0% $12.72 $241 Energy Surcharge42 < 10 sq ft $190.01 $340.92 0% $340.00 $15043 10 - 50 sq ft $217.16 $340.92 0% $340.00 $12344 50 sq ft and above $244.30 $340.92 0% $340.00 $9645 Disabled Access Review 46 Plan Check 40 110
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 47 $2,000.00 $76.00 base fee @ $2,000 $90.60 1% $90.00 $1448 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $2.60 each add'l $1,000 $3.10 0% $3.10 $049 $25,000.00 $135.72 base fee @ $25,000 $161.79 0% $161.00 $2550 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $10.86 each add'l $1,000 $12.94 0% $12.94 $251 $50,000.00 $407.17 base fee @ $50,000 $485.37 0% $485.00 $7852 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $5.54 each add'l $1,000 $6.60 0% $6.60 $153 $100,000.00 $684.04 base fee @ $100,000 $815.42 0% $815.00 $13154 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $3.18 each add'l $1,000 $3.79 0% $3.79 $155 $500,000.00 $1,954.40 base fee @ $500,000 $2,329.78 0% $2,329.00 $37556 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $4.56 each add'l $1,000 $5.44 0% $5.44 $157 1000000 $4,234.53 base fee @ $1,000,000 $5,047.85 0% $5,047.00 $81258 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $4.23 each add'l $1,000 $5.05 0% $5.05 $159 Inspection60 $2,000.00 $108.58 base fee @ $2,000 $129.43 0% $129.00 $2061 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $3.54 each add'l $1,000 $4.22 0% $4.22 $162 $25,000.00 $190.01 base fee @ $25,000 $226.51 0% $226.00 $3663 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $11.94 each add'l $1,000 $14.24 0% $14.24 $264 $50,000.00 $488.60 base fee @ $50,000 $582.44 0% $582.00 $9365 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $4.78 each add'l $1,000 $5.69 0% $5.69 $166 $100,000.00 $727.47 base fee @ $100,000 $867.20 0% $867.00 $14067 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $1.44 each add'l $1,000 $1.72 0% $1.72 $0 41 111
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 68 $500,000.00 $1,302.93 base fee @ $500,000 $1,553.19 0% $1,553.00 $25069 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $1.30 each add'l $1,000 $1.55 0% $1.55 $070 $1,000,000.00 $1,954.40 base fee @ $1,000,000 $2,329.78 0% $2,329.00 $37571 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $1.95 each add'l $1,000 $2.33 0% $2.33 $072 High Fire Hazard Area Fee73 Plan Check74 $2,000.00 $54.29 base fee @ $2,000 $64.72 1% $64.00 $1075 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $1.18 each add'l $1,000 $1.41 0% $1.41 $076 $25,000.00 $81.43 base fee @ $25,000 $97.07 0% $97.00 $1677 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $2.17 each add'l $1,000 $2.59 0% $2.59 $078 $50,000.00 $135.72 base fee @ $50,000 $161.79 0% $161.00 $2579 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $1.09 each add'l $1,000 $1.29 0% $1.29 $080 $100,000.00 $190.01 base fee @ $100,000 $226.51 0% $226.00 $3681 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.07 each add'l $1,000 $0.08 0% $0.08 $082 $500,000.00 $217.16 base fee @ $500,000 $258.86 0% $258.00 $4183 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.16 each add'l $1,000 $0.19 0% $0.19 $084 $1,000,000.00 $298.59 base fee @ $1,000,000 $355.94 0% $355.00 $5685 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.30 each add'l $1,000 $0.36 0% $0.36 $086 Inspection87 $2,000.00 $162.87 base fee @ $2,000 $194.15 0% $194.00 $3188 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $3.54 each add'l $1,000 $4.22 0% $4.22 $189 $25,000.00 $244.30 base fee @ $25,000 $291.22 0% $291.00 $47 42 112
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 90 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $9.77 each add'l $1,000 $11.65 0% $11.65 $291 $50,000.00 $488.60 base fee @ $50,000 $582.44 0% $582.00 $9392 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $3.26 each add'l $1,000 $3.88 0% $3.88 $193 $100,000.00 $651.47 base fee @ $100,000 $776.59 0% $776.00 $12594 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.54 each add'l $1,000 $0.65 0% $0.65 $095 $500,000.00 $868.62 base fee @ $500,000 $1,035.46 0% $1,035.00 $16696 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.22 each add'l $1,000 $0.26 0% $0.26 $097 $1,000,000.00 $977.20 base fee @ $1,000,000 $1,164.89 0% $1,164.00 $18798 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.98 each add'l $1,000 $1.16 0% $1.16 $099 MPE Plan Review100 $2,000.00 $81.43 base fee @ $2,000 $97.07 0% $97.00 $16101 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $3.54 each add'l $1,000 $4.22 0% $4.22 $1102 $25,000.00 $162.87 base fee @ $25,000 $194.15 0% $194.00 $31103 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $6.51 each add'l $1,000 $7.77 0% $7.77 $1104 $50,000.00 $325.73 base fee @ $50,000 $388.30 0% $388.00 $62105 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $7.60 each add'l $1,000 $9.06 0% $9.06 $1106 $100,000.00 $705.76 base fee @ $100,000 $841.31 0% $841.00 $135107 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $6.11 each add'l $1,000 $7.28 0% $7.28 $1108 $500,000.00 $3,148.76 base fee @ $500,000 $3,753.53 0% $3,753.00 $604109 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $5.05 each add'l $1,000 $6.02 0% $6.02 $1110 $1,000,000.00 $5,673.19 base fee @ $1,000,000 $6,762.83 0% $6,762.00 $1,089 43 113
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 111 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $5.67 each add'l $1,000 $6.76 0% $6.76 $1112 Additional Plan Review Fee $81.43 $97.07 0% $97.00 $16113 Fast Track Plan Review Fee $217.16 $258.86 0% $258.00 $41114 Mobile home/coach foundation system plan check $434.31 $517.73 0% $517.00 $83115 Use of outside consultants for plan review $108.58 $129.43 0% $129.00 $20116 Green Building For the review of C.C.T. Title 24, Part 11 requirements117 Plan Check118 $2,000.00 $86.86 base fee @ $2,000 $103.55 1% $103.00 $16119 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.94 each add'l $1,000 $1.13 0% $1.13 $0120 $25,000.00 $108.58 base fee @ $25,000 $129.43 0% $129.00 $20121 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.65 each add'l $1,000 $0.78 0% $0.78 $0122 $50,000.00 $124.86 base fee @ $50,000 $148.85 1% $148.00 $23123 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.65 each add'l $1,000 $0.78 0% $0.78 $0124 $100,000.00 $157.44 base fee @ $100,000 $187.68 0% $187.00 $30125 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.37 each add'l $1,000 $0.44 0% $0.44 $0126 $500,000.00 $304.02 base fee @ $500,000 $362.41 0% $362.00 $58127 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.42 each add'l $1,000 $0.50 0% $0.50 $0128 $1,000,000.00 $515.74 base fee @ $1,000,000 $614.80 0% $614.00 $98129 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.52 each add'l $1,000 $0.61 0% $0.61 $0130 Inspection131 $2,000.00 $54.29 base fee @ $2,000 $64.72 1% $64.00 $10132 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $1.18 each add'l $1,000 $1.41 0% $1.41 $0 44 114
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 133 $25,000.00 $81.43 base fee @ $25,000 $97.07 0% $97.00 $16134 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $1.09 each add'l $1,000 $1.29 0% $1.29 $0135 $50,000.00 $108.58 base fee @ $50,000 $129.43 0% $129.00 $20136 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.54 each add'l $1,000 $0.65 0% $0.65 $0137 $100,000.00 $135.72 base fee @ $100,000 $161.79 0% $161.00 $25138 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.68 each add'l $1,000 $0.81 0% $0.81 $0139 $500,000.00 $407.17 base fee @ $500,000 $485.37 0% $485.00 $78140 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.92 each add'l $1,000 $1.10 0% $1.10 $0141 $1,000,000.00 $868.62 base fee @ $1,000,000 $1,035.46 0% $1,035.00 $166142 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.87 each add'l $1,000 $1.04 0% $1.04 $0143 Flood Plain Construction Fee144 Plan Check145 $2,000.00 $48.86 base fee @ $2,000 $58.24 0% $58.00 $9146 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $3.07 each add'l $1,000 $3.66 0% $3.66 $1147 $25,000.00 $119.44 base fee @ $25,000 $142.38 0% $142.00 $23148 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $5.86 each add'l $1,000 $6.99 0% $6.99 $1149 $50,000.00 $266.02 base fee @ $50,000 $317.11 0% $317.00 $51150 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $1.52 each add'l $1,000 $1.81 0% $1.81 $0151 $100,000.00 $342.02 base fee @ $100,000 $407.71 0% $407.00 $65152 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.26 each add'l $1,000 $0.31 0% $0.31 $0153 $500,000.00 $445.17 base fee @ $500,000 $530.67 0% $530.00 $85154 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.48 each add'l $1,000 $0.57 0% $0.57 $0 45 115
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 155 $1,000,000.00 $684.04 base fee @ $1,000,000 $815.42 0% $815.00 $131156 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.68 each add'l $1,000 $0.82 0% $0.82 $0157 Inspection158 $2,000.00 $32.57 base fee @ $2,000 $38.83 2% $38.00 $5159 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $3.30 each add'l $1,000 $3.94 0% $3.94 $1160 $25,000.00 $108.58 base fee @ $25,000 $129.43 0% $129.00 $20161 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $2.17 each add'l $1,000 $2.59 0% $2.59 $0162 $50,000.00 $162.87 base fee @ $50,000 $194.15 0% $194.00 $31163 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $3.26 each add'l $1,000 $3.88 0% $3.88 $1164 $100,000.00 $325.73 base fee @ $100,000 $388.30 0% $388.00 $62165 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.31 each add'l $1,000 $0.37 0% $0.37 $0166 $500,000.00 $450.60 base fee @ $500,000 $537.14 0% $537.00 $86167 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.68 each add'l $1,000 $0.82 0% $0.82 $0168 $1,000,000.00 $792.62 base fee @ $1,000,000 $944.85 0% $944.00 $151169 each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $0.79 each add'l $1,000 $0.94 0% $0.94 $0170 III - Miscellaneous Fees171 Simple Scope Building Permit Items $228.01 $166.86 1% $166.00 -$62172 Re-Roof173 Window Replacement174 "City Standard" Block Walls and Retaining Walls175 Drywall Repair176 Mobile home/coach installation $461.46 $223.05 0% $223.00 -$238177 Mobile home/coach installation on a permanent foundation $1,004.34 $444.39 0% $444.00 -$560 178 Commercial business license, review and inspection $114.01 $223.05 0% $223.00 $109179 Sign inspection (when no permit issued) $81.43 $223.05 0% $223.00 $142180 Inspections outside of normal business hours (per hr.) (minimum charge two hours) $217.16 $333.72 0% $333.00 $116 46 116
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 181 Re-inspection fee (per hr.) $108.58 $110.67 1% $110.00 $1182 Code Compliance Investigation fee for request toinvestigate proposed changes, including changes in use or occupancy prior to submittal of plans 183 up to and including 3,000 sq. ft $434.31 $285.37 0% $285.00 -$149184 for each additional 500 sq. ft. or fraction thereof $32.57 NA NA $32.57 $0185 Demolition or wrecking permit (partial) $32.57 $223.05 0% $223.00 $190186 Demolition or wrecking permit (complete) $81.43 $223.05 0% $223.00 $142187 Fire Damage Inspection Fee $217.16 $223.05 0% $223.00 $6188 Home Occupation permit, review and inspection $86.86 $166.86 1% $166.00 $79189 Address Change (Owner Request) $162.87 $56.19 0% $56.00 -$107190 Relocation Investigation Fee $488.60 $546.89 0% $546.00 $57191 Technology surcharge $11.22 (per 1,000 of building valuation) 7% 0% 7% of Permit Fee NA 192
Where the inspection is conducted outside the City of Santa Paula, additional changes shall be paid for travel at the rate of $0.38 per mile and the inspector's time at the rate of $75.00 per hour during the period the inspector is outside the City of Santa Paula. (Per Mile) $0.00 NA NA $0.00 $0
193 Per hour charge $108.58 $110.67 1% $110.00 $1194 Inspection Fee (Per Hour) $249.73 $211.46 0% $211.00 -$39195 Code Enforcement Processing Fees:196 Whenever any work for which a permit is required bythe technical codes has been commenced without first obtaining said permit (s), or whenever a Code Enforcement Case is started due to a violation of the Santa Paula Municipal Code, a Code Enforcement Processing Fee equal to the permit fee (s) but not less than $200.00 shall be collected. $434.31 $535.30 0% $535.00 $101
197 Plan Filing Fee $27.14 $28.10 0% $28.00 $1198 Application Processing Fee $135.72 $168.57 0% $168.00 $32199 Records Research (1/2 hr. minimum) $54.29 $56.19 0% $56.00 $2200 Temporary or partial certificate inspection request (per hour) $162.87 $392.38 0% $392.00 $229201 Appeals Hearing Request202 Owner occupied single family dwelling $760.04 $804.34 0% $804.00 $44203 All other appeals $1,737.25 $1,818.42 0% $1,818.00 $81204 Release of Non Compliance Notice $542.89 $619.09 0% $619.00 $76205 Other Inspections and Fees206 Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated (per hr.) $54.29 $75.59 1% $75.00 $21207 For use of outside consultants for inspections plus 20% administrative over-site $651.47 NA NA $651.47 $0208 Building & Safety Inspection $109.00 NA NA $109.00 $0209 IV - MPE (Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical) Permits210 MPE Permit issuance211 Issuance of initial/primary permit $92.29 $112.38 0% $112.00 $20 47 117
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 212 For issuing each supplemental permit for which the original permit has not expired, been canceled or finaled $81.43 $112.38 0% $112.00 $31 213 MPE New Construction (placeholder) (tiered by s.f. of project)214 Plumbing (per 1,000 s.f.) $108.58 $112.38 0% $112.00 $3215 Mechanical (per 1,000 s.f.) $108.58 $112.38 0% $112.00 $3216 Electrical (per 1,000 s.f.) $108.58 $112.38 0% $112.00 $3217 MPE - Unit Fee Schedule - Simple218 (up to 3 items from simple schedule) $72.39 $112.38 0% $112.00 $40219 MPE Unit Fee Schedule - Complex Scope Items - Plumbing220 Fixtures and Vents221 Industrial/Commercial waste interceptor (including trap and vent) $65.15 $110.67 1% $110.00 $45222 Industrial waste sample well (each) $65.15 $110.67 1% $110.00 $45223 Rainwater piping system per drain (inside building) $21.72 $110.67 1% $110.00 $88224 Graywater systems Residential $233.44 $110.67 1% $110.00 -$123225 For each cesspool $108.58 $110.67 1% $110.00 $1226 For each private sewage disposal system $271.44 $110.67 1% $110.00 -$161227 For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor,including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps $54.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $56
228 Rainwater systems--per drain (inside building) $16.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $94229 Swimming Pools230 Public pool $380.02 $332.01 0% $332.00 -$48231 Public spa $271.44 $221.34 0% $221.00 -$50232 Private pool $190.01 $221.34 0% $221.00 $31233 Private spa $108.58 $110.67 1% $110.00 $1234 Solar water heating system, including collectors, piping, tank, and valves 235 Domestic (portable) water heating $108.58 $110.67 1% $110.00 $1236 Swimming pool/spa heating $108.58 $110.67 1% $110.00 $1237 Miscellaneous238 For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Plumbing Code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code. $54.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $56 239 Minimum Fee240 When a plumbing permit is not obtained in conjunction with other types of permits, the minimum fee shall be $16.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $94 241 MPE Unit Fee Schedule - Complex Scope Items - Mechanical242 Boilers, Compressors and Absorption Systems243 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including 2 horsepower (10.6 kW), or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h (29.3 kW) $32.57 $110.67 1% $110.00 $77
244
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 3 horsepower (10.6 kW) to and including 15 horsepower (52.7 kW), or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h (29.3 kW) to and including 500,000 Btu/h (146.6 kW) $65.15 $110.67 1% $110.00 $45
48 118
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 245
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower (52.7 kW) to and including 30 horsepower (105.5 kW), or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h (146.6 kW) to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h (293.1 kW) $81.43 $110.67 1% $110.00 $29
246
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower (105.5 kW) to and including 50 horsepower (176 kW), or each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h (293.1 kW) to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h (512.9 kW) $92.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $18
247 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 50 horsepower (176 kW) or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h (512.9 kW) $108.58 $110.67 1% $110.00 $1 248 Air Handlers249 For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute (cfm) (4719 L/s), including ducts attached thereto $32.57 $110.67 1% $110.00 $77 250 For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm (4719 L/s) $32.57 $110.67 1% $110.00 $77251 Incinerators252 For the installation or relocation of each domestic-type incinerator $27.14 $110.67 1% $110.00 $83253 For the installation of each commercial or industrial-type incinerator $27.14 $110.67 1% $110.00 $83254 Miscellaneous255 For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Mechanical Code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in the table $54.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $56 256 Minimum Fee257 When mechanical permits are not obtained in conjunction with other types of permits, the minimum fee shall be $54.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $56 258 MPE Unit Fee Schedule - Complex Scope Items - Electrical259 Carnivals and Circuses260 Each electrically driven ride $54.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $56261 For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attraction or displays having electrical lighting $54.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $56 262 Miscellaneous263 Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors (permit is required but no fee is herein set forth) $54.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $56 264 Generator/Electrical Permit $208.00 NA NA $208.00 $0265 Minimum Fee266 When electrical permits are not obtained in conjunction with other types of permits, the minimum fee shall be $54.29 $110.67 1% $110.00 $56 267 Electrical Service Restoration268 For inspection prior to reactivation of an electrical service $108.58 $110.67 1% $110.00 $1269 V - PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW270 Per application $434.31 $570.74 0% $570.00 $136 49 119
Building and Safety Fees
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 271
For services requested of City staff which have no fee listed in this fee schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the established hourly rates for this department/division. Additionally, the City will passthrough to the applicant any discrete costs incurred from the use of external service providers if required to process the specific application. 272 Permit Fees for PV (Photovoltaic)273 Residential 274 Residential 15kW or less $450.00 NA NA $450.00 $0275 More than 15kW $500.00 plus $15/kW above 15kW NA NA $500.00 $0276 Commercial277 50kW or less $1,000.00 plus $7/kW above 50kW NA NA $1,000.00 $0278 More than 250kW $2,400.00 plus $5/kW above 250kW NA NA $2,400.00 $0 50 120
Police Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 City Animal Nuisance (ie Barking Dog) Complaint $0.00 NA NA $100 for 2nd complaint/response, any other responsed within 30 days doubles amount. $100
2 Abandoned Vehicle Towing - Abatement $62.08 $285.95 46% $154.00 $923 Storage Impound Release $154.00 NA NA $154.00 $04 Annual Alarm Registration Fee $19.17 $37.45 47% $20.00 $15 Police False Alarm Response - 1st & 2nd within 12 months No Charge NA NA No Charge $06 Police False Alarm Response - 3rd Response $93.00 $157.15 12% $139.00 $467 Police False Alarm Response - 4th Response $93.00 $157.15 5% $149.00 $568 Police False Alarm Response - 5th Response $93.00 NA NA $159.00 $669 Police False Alarm Response - All Subsequent Responses $93.00 NA NA $169.00 $7610 DUI Accident/Arrest Response State set limit Penalty per city municipal code 93.35A4 NA NA State set limit $0 11 Nuisance Service Call(Loud Party Response) - 1st response No Charge NA NA $100 for 2nd complaint/response, any other responsed within 30 days doubles amount. $100
12 2nd response Penalty Penalty per city municipal code 93.35A4 NA NA $200.00 $0 13 Reports - up to first 10 pages or less $19.17 $39.29 49% $20.00 $114 Crime Report - additional pages $0.10 page NA NA $0.10 $015 Vehicle for Hire Permit $248.31 NA NA $248.31 $016 Vehicle for Hire License $217.27 NA NA $217.27 $017 Concealed Weapons Permits Set by State Law Service provided by county sheriff's office NA NA Set by State Law $0 18 Clearance Letter $30.00 NA NA $30.00 $019 Fingerprinting $25.00 DOJ fees and FBI fees may apply in addition to the City's fees NA NA $25.00 $0
20 Live Scan $30.00 NA NA $30.00 $021 Card $30.00 NA NA $30.00 $022 Parking Enforcement - Citations Range Fees apply per contractor agreement NA NA Range $0 23 Parking Enforcement - processing fee if citation not paid $13.26 Fees apply per contractor agreement NA NA $50.00 $37 24 Parking Enforcement - citation not paid/notice given to DMV $3.06 Fees apply per contractor agreement NA NA $3.06 $0 51 121
Police Fees
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 25 U-Visa Immigration Form (I-98) $28.76 NA NA $0.00 -$2926 Correctable vehicle code infractions27 3rd party processing fee $12.00 Fees apply per contractor agreement NA NA $12.00 $0 28 City Officer Sign-Off $31.00 NA NA $0.00 -$3129 VIN (Vehicle Identification Number) Verification $19.17 NA NA $20.00 $130 Peddler/Vendor Solicitors Application (support to Planning) $93.12 NA NA $93.12 $031 Police Officer $124.00 $253.21 27% $186.00 $6232 For services requested of City staff which have no fee listed in this fee schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the established hourly rates for this department/division. Additionally, the City will pass-through to the applicant any discrete costs incurred from the use of external service providers if required to process the specific application. 52 122
Parks and Recreation
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 1 Banners2 Banner Teague Park $25.00 week NA NA $35.00 week $103 Main Street Banner $300.00 week NA NA $330.00 week $304 Main Street Banner - Over street $612.22 $406.67 0% $406.00 -$2065 Jolly Jumps6 Jolly Jump Permit $38.00 $46.63 10% $42.00 $47 Jolly Jump Vendor Registration $19.00 $31.09 20% $25.00 $68 Parks9 Hershel Hopkins, Tom Moore, Richard Ruiz, Teague Park, Las Piedras Park, Tony Vasquez, McKevett Park 10 Category 2 User $8.00 hour NA NA $12.00 hour $411 Category 3 User $16.00 hour NA NA $24.00 hour $812 Category 4 User $16.00 hour NA NA $24.00 hour $813 Category 5 User $16.00 hour NA NA $24.00 hour $814 Category 6 User $16.00 hour plus 25% NA NA $24.00 hour $815 Category 7 User $16.00 hour plus 40% NA NA $24.00 hour $816 Batting Cages17 Harding Park Batting Cages New hour 2 hour minimum NA NA $10.00 hour NA18 Basketball Courts: Las Piedras Park, Teague Park & Sports Park 19 Category 2 User New hour NA NA $8.00 hour NA20 Category 3 User New hour NA NA $12.00 hour NA21 Category 4 User New hour NA NA $12.00 hour NA22 Category 5 User New hour NA NA $12.00 hour NA23 Category 6 User New hour plus 25% NA NA $12.00 hour NA24 Category 7 User New hour plus 40% NA NA $16.00 hour NA25 Sports Park Athletic / Soccer Fields & Softball / Baseball Fields 26 Category 2 User New hour NA NA $25.00 hour NA27 Category 3-5 User New hour NA NA $40.00 hour NA28 Category 6 User New hour NA NA $40 plus 25% hour NA29 Category 7 User New hour NA NA $40 plus 40% hour NA30 Sports Field Lights31 Softball/Baseball $8.00 NA NA $17.00 $932 Soccer $13.00 NA NA $17.00 $433 Basketball Courts New hour NA NA $17.00 hour NA34 Amphitheater35 Nonprofit New per hour 2 hour minimum NA NA $35.00 per hour NA36 Regular Rate New per hour 2 hour minimum; Non- resident pay rate +40% NA NA $75.00 per hour NA37 BBQ Areas / Park Rental Space 53 123
Parks and Recreation
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 38 Sports Park BBQ Pavillons New flat rate $200 deposit; Non- resident pay rate +40% NA NA $200.00 flat rate NA39 Recreation Park $70.00 flat rate $200 deposit; Non- resident pay rate +40% NA NA $128.00 flat rate $5840 FACILITY RENTALS41 Community Center Auditorium42 Non Profit New hour 4 hour minimum NA NA $135.00 hour NA43 Regular Rate New hour 4 hour minimum NA NA $235.00 hour NA44 Meeting / Assembly New hour 2 hour minimum NA NA $135.00 hour NA45 Kitchen New flate rate kitchen closes at 9pm NA NA $185.00 flate rate NA46 Setup $180.00 flat rate NA NA $180.00 flat rate $047 Breakdown $180.00 flat rate NA NA $180.00 flat rate $048 Deposit New NA NA $500.00 NA49 Senior Dining Room50 Non Profit $49.00 hr 2 hour minimum NA NA $65.00 hr $1651 Regular $49.00 hr 2 hour minimum NA NA $95.00 hr $4652 Community Center Back Lobby53 Non Profit $132.00 3 hr 2 hour minimum NA NA $65.00 hour -$6754 Regular Rate $175.00 3 hr 2 hour minimum NA NA $95.00 hour -$8055 Cultural Arts Building56 Non Profit $59.00 hr 2 hr minimum NA NA $115.00 hr $5657 Regular $66.00 hr 2 hr minimum NA NA $135.00 hr $6958 Train Depot59 Non Profit $59.00 hour NA NA $75.00 hour $1660 Regular $66.00 hour NA NA $95.00 hour $2961 Council Chambers62 Non Profit New NA NA $125.00 NA63 Regular New NA NA $225.00 NA64 Special Event65 Application Fee Minor Event $130.00 $147.44 2% $145.00 $1566 Application Fee Major Event $346.00 $515.64 27% $375.00 $2967 Encroachment Permit $245.00 NA NA $245.00 $068 Late Application Fee (less than 60-days) $87.00 NA NA $87.00 $069 Late Application Fee (less than 30-days) $217.00 NA NA $217.00 $070 Special Event Liason (Parks & Recreation Staff) New hourly $148.46 0% $148.00 hourly NA71 Filming 72 Nonrefundable Filiming Permit Application Fee $68.00 $1,685.78 82% $300.00 $232 54 124
Parks and Recreation
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 73 For First Day (or fraction thereof) Filming $280.00 NA NA $500.00 $22074 For each additional day (or fraction thereof) of Filming $115.00 NA NA $250.00 $13575 City Parking Lot $500.00 NA NA $550.00 $5076 City Building $500.00 NA NA $750.00 $25077 Film Coordinator New hourly $148.46 0% $148.00 hourly NA78 Staff Costs79 Parks & Recreation Staff $130.00 $148.46 0% $148.00 $1880 Parks & Recreation Part Time Staff $45.00 NA NA $45.00 $081 Other Fees82 Podium New flat rate NA NA $75.00 flat rate NA83 Projector New flat rate NA NA $75.00 flat rate NA84 PA Setup (2 speakers/1 Mic) New flat rate NA NA $150.00 flat rate NA85 Spider Box New per box NA NA $25.00 per box NA86 Use of Electricity (at parks and events) New hour NA NA $13.00 hour NA87 Generator New hour $100 deposit NA NA $45.00 hour NA88 Mobile Lights New hour $300 deposit / plus $300 drop off and pick up fee NA NA $115.00 hour NA89 Field Use Processing Fee (more than 30 days) 20.00 NA NA $20.00 $0.0090 Field Use Processing Fee (less than 30 days) 40.00 NA NA $40.00 $0.0091 Liability Insurance for Rentals & Events $113.00 This rate depends on what the insurance company premiums are; this should be set at City's discretion.

NA NA Actual Cost $0
92 Union Oil Building Courtyard New hour $200 deposit / 4 hour minimum NA NA $100.00 hour NA 55 125
27368 Via Industria, Suite 200
Temecula, California 92590-4856
800.755.6864 | Fax: 888.326.6864
951.587.3500 | Fax: 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
126
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Monica Castillo, City Attorney
Subject:

INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1350 AMENDING CHAPTERS

16.212 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS), 16.214 (AGRICULTURAL
PRESERVE AND LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACTS), 16.216
(SPECIFIC PLANS), 16.218 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS), 16.220 (VARIANCES), 16.222 (MINOR MODIFICATIONS), 16.224 (ZONING CLEARANCE), 16.227 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS), 16.228
(TEMPORARY USE PERMIT), 16.230 (HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT),

16.234 (DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS), 16.236 (ANNEXATIONS),

16.237 (81 ACRE INITIATIVE IMPLEMENTATION), AND 16.238 (SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT) OF TITLE XVI: DEVELOPMENT CODE OF

THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE IN ORDER TO CORRECT

INCONSISTENCIES, OUTDATED LANGUAGE AND FORMATTING AND

FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA
UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 11.B

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing; and

2. Waive the first reading by title only, and introduce Ordinance No. 1350, entitled “An Ordinance amending Chapters 16.200 (Administration – General Provisions), 16.202 (Applications, Processing, Filing and Fees), 16.204 (Public Hearings), 16.206 (Appeals and Revocations), 16.208 (Development Code Amendments), 16.210 (Zone Change),

16.212 (General Plan Amendments), 16.214 (Agricultural Preserve and Land Conservation Contracts), 16.216 (Specific Plans), 16.218 (Conditional Use Permits),

16.220 (Variances), 16.222 (Minor Modifications), 16.224 (Zoning Clearance), 16.227 (Accessory Dwelling Units), 16.228 (Temporary Use Permit), 16.230 (Home Occupation Permit), 16.234 (Development Agreements), 16.236 (Annexations), 16.237 (81 Acre Initiative Implementation), and 16.238 (Site Development Permit) of Title XVI Development Code of the Santa Paula Municipal Code in order to correct 127
inconsistencies, outdated language and formatting and finding the Action to be Statutorily Exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(B)(3) of the Public Resources Code”
Presented by: Monica Castillo, City Attorney
BACKGROUND:

The Municipal Code has not undergone a comprehensive update since November 17, 1997.

Since then, amendments have been adopted as needed to respond to changes in state law, sometimes resulting in internal inconsistencies within the Code and operational challenges.

Recognizing the need for a Code overhaul, one of the objectives City Council placed in the City's 2023-2025 Two-Year Strategic Plan (Goal G, Objective 2) is to review the City's Municipal Code to reduce irrelevant code sections and update the Development Code. This goal was also identified as a mid-level priority (2 out of 1-3) in the Citygate Associates report dated June 19, 2024 recommending that the City review development codes and state laws to update policies and procedures for discretionary planning approvals, licenses and permits.

On May 9, 2024, the City Council and Planning Commission held a joint study session for a presentation on the comprehensive Municipal Code update, where they were asked to select one of three ways to approach the Municipal Code update. Option 3 was selected, directing staff and the City Attorney's office to begin with the Development Code (Title XVI) and simultaneously go through the other titles. Since then, this Council has reviewed and approved several sizable batches of code updates.

On April 2, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1343, amending Chapters 160 (Development Impact Fees), 16.01 (Enactment and Applicability), 16.03 (Administration and Enforcement), and 16.05 (Definitions).

On June 4, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1345, amending Chapters 16.07 (Establishment of Zones), 16.09 (Open Space Zones), 16.11 (Agricultural Zones), 16.21 (Industrial Zones), and 16.27 (Airport Zones).

On July 2, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1346, amending Chapters 16.13 (Residential Zones), 16.15 (Commercial Zones), 16.23 (Institutional Zones), 16.25 (Airport Zones), 16.29 (Railroad Overlay Zone), 16.31 (Planned Development Overlay Zone), 16.33 (Historic Landmark Overlay Zone), 16.34 (Historical Property Agreements), 16.35 (Housing Opportunities Overlay Zone), 16.40 (General Property Development Standards). Excluded from the ordinance were primary dwelling unit standards (Section 16.13.030) and the City's inclusionary housing ordinance (Section 16.13.400 et seq.) for further consideration by the Planning Commission.

On October 1, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1348 amending Chapters 16.52 (Swimming Pools), 16.56 (Amusement Arcades), 16.58 (Alcoholic Beverage Sales), 16.60 (Child Day Care Facilities), 16.62 (Assembly Halls), 16.64 (Community Care Facilities), 16.66 (Drive-Through Facilities), 16.68 (Newsracks), 16.70 (Recycling Facilities), 16.72 (Service Stations), 16.74 (Vending Machines), 16.75 (Prohibition on Industrial Hemp Cultivation), 16.76 (Yard and Garage Sales), 16.77 (Electric Vehicle Charging Systems; Streamlined Permitting), 128

16.78 (Emergency Shelters), 16.79 (Regulation of Cannabis Activities), 16.80 (Subdivision Regulations), 16.85 (Condominiums and Conversions), 16.96 (Grading Permits), 16.97 (Grading Regulation), 16.98 (Hillside Grading Practices), 16.99 (Drainage, Erosion, and Dust Control), 16.100 (General Provisions), 16.102 (Permit and Reclamation Plan), 16.104 (Regulations for Operation of Surface Mine), 16.106 (Growth Management), 16.108 (Transportation Demand Management), and 16.110 (Nonconformities). Amendments included rewording of former Section 16.74.010, renumbered Section 16.36.010, to better describe vending machines that serve customers from a building's exterior (e.g. water stores), and deletion of "Director" from the definitions in former Section 16.80.020, renumbered Section

16.42.020 due its redundancy.

On September 23, 2025, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3875 recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending Chapters 16.200 (Administration – General Provisions), 16.202 (Applications, Processing, Filing and Fees),

16.204 (Public Hearings), 16.206 (Appeals and Revocations), 16.208 (Development Code Amendments), 16.210 (Zone Change), 16.212 (General Plan Amendments), 16.214 (Agricultural Preserve and Land Conservation Contracts), 16.216 (Specific Plans), 16.218 (Conditional Use Permits), 16.220 (Variances), 16.222 (Minor Modifications), 16.224 (Zoning Clearance), 16.227 (Accessory Dwelling Units), 16.228 (Temporary Use Permit), 16.230 (Home Occupation Permit), 16.234 (Development Agreements), 16.236 (Annexations), 16.237 (81 Acre Initiative Implementation), and 16.238 (Site Development Permit) of Title XVI Development Code of the Santa Paula Municipal Code in order to correct inconsistencies, outdated language and formatting and finding the Action to be Statutorily Exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(B)(3) of the Public Resources Code.” This is the ordinance being introduced at tonight's meeting.

ANALYSIS:

Renumbering & References
The revisions to Chapters 16.200 (Administration – General Provisions), 16.202 (Applications, Processing, Filing and Fees), 16.204 (Public Hearings), 16.206 (Appeals and Revocations),

16.208 (Development Code Amendments), 16.210 (Zone Change), 16.212 (General Plan Amendments), 16.214 (Agricultural Preserve and Land Conservation Contracts), 16.216 (Specific Plans), 16.218 (Conditional Use Permits), 16.220 (Variances), 16.222 (Minor Modifications), 16.224 (Zoning Clearance), 16.227 (Accessory Dwelling Units), 16.228 (Temporary Use Permit), 16.230 (Home Occupation Permit), 16.234 (Development Agreements), 16.236 (Annexations), 16.237 (81 Acre Initiative Implementation), and 16.238 (Site Development Permit) are a result of the City-initiated Municipal Code amendment. These Chapters were identified to contain inconsistencies, outdated language and/or formatting errors. The sequencing of the Chapters is being amended for consistency with other changes made earlier. References to "Planning Director" were also replaced with “Community and Economic Development Director” or "Director", which definition includes the current title of Community and Economic Development Director.

Evidence of Noticing
Current Section 16.204.020(C) has been revised so that notice of a public hearing sign must be posted 10 days instead of 11 days before the hearing to align with the City’s other noticing practices, e.g., postcards, newspapers, etc.
129
Time Limit for Implementing Conditional Use Permit
Current Section 16.218.090(B) has been changed from allowing a lapsed Conditional Use Permit to be renewed for a single one-year period to two continuous one-year periods.

Minor Conditional Use Permit
A new section was added to authorize the Director to grant permits for minor changes related to use permits, planned development permits, variances, and similar actions granted by the City Council, the Planning Commission or the Director. When current sections of Chapter

16.218 are renumbered, the new section will be Section 16.63.100.

Minor Modifications
Current Section 16.222.010(B)(1)(b) was amended to clarify permissible minor modifications for automobile parking space configurations (e.g., tandem parking, 3-car garages, etc.).

Section 16.226 (Design Review) was originally included in the notice for this set of code updates, however, staff determined there are significant revisions to this section requiring additional public input. This section will thus be heard a later public meeting.

With the exception of the foregoing proposed amendments, substantive amendments to these chapters recommended by the Planning Commission will return to Council at a future meeting.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Reviewing the City's municipal code for updates and to reduce irrelevancy directly relates to 2025-2027 Strategic Goal F.1 Operational Excellence/Municipal Code.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

There are no direct fiscal impacts from this code update.

OPTIONS:

In addition to the recommended action, the City Council has available to it the following alternative options:

1. Do not introduce proposed Ordinance No. 1350; or

2. Introduce the proposed ordinance with minor modifications; and/or

3. Provide recommendations to the Planning Commission when substantive consideration of the affected Development Code sections is done.

ATTACHMENTS:

A - CC Ordinance No. 1350 - SPMC Batch 7 Updates.docx
SANTA PAULA_MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE - Chapter 16 Text - Dev Code 7 Update 130
1 ORDINANCE NO. 1350

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
PAULA AMENDING CHAPTERS 16.200 ADMINISTRATION – GENERAL PROVISIONS, 16.202 APPLICATIONS, PROCESSING, FILING AND FEES, 16.204 PUBLIC HEARINGS, 16.206 APPEALS AND
REVOCATIONS, 16.208 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS, 16.210 ZONE CHANGE, 16.212 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, 16.214

AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE AND LAND CONSERVATION
CONTRACTS, 16.216 SPECIFIC PLANS, 16.218 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, 16.220 VARIANCES, 16.222 MINOR MODIFICATIONS, 16.224 ZONING CLEARANCE, 16.227 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, 16.228 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT, 16.230 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT,

16.234 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, 16.236 ANNEXATIONS, 16.237 81 ACRE INITIATIVE IMPLEMENTATION, AND 16.238 SITE

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT OF TITLE XVI DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE

SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE IN ORDER TO CORRECT

INCONSISTENCIES, OUTDATED LANGUAGE AND FORMATTING AND

FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA
UNDER SECTION 15061(b)(3) OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
The City Council of the City of Santa Paula does ordain as follows:

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Paula (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Paula wishes to protect and preserve the quality of life throughout the City, through effective land use and planning; and WHEREAS, the City initiated a Municipal Code update in order to bring the entire code up to date, clarify appropriate uses within the City, and align with current State law; and
WHEREAS, in recent years, the California Legislature has approved, and the Governor has signed into law, a number of bills that, among other things, amend various sections of the Government Code to impose new limits on local authority to regulate standards that guide how land can be used and developed within cities; and WHEREAS, Santa Paula Municipal Code (“SPMC”) Chapters 16.200 Administration – General Provisions, 16.202 Applications, Processing, Filing and Fees,

16.204 Public Hearings, 16.206 Appeals and Revocations, 16.208 Development Code Amendments, 16.210 Zone Change, 16.212 General Plan Amendments, 16.214 131
2 Agricultural Preserve and Land Conservation Contracts, 16.216 Specific Plans, 16.218 Conditional Use Permits, 16.220 Variances, 16.222 Minor Modifications, 16.224 Zoning Clearance, 16.227 Accessory Dwelling Units, 16.228 Temporary Use Permit, 16.230 Home Occupation Permit, 16.234 Development Agreements, 16.236 Annexations, 16.237 81 Acre Initiative Implementation, and 16.238 Site Development Permit, were reviewed by staff and identified to contain inconsistencies, outdated language, and/or conflicts with current state law; and
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2025 the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning this proposed Ordinance. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to forward the Ordinance to the City Council with a recommendation in favor of its adoption; and
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2025 the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing to consider the proposed Ordinance, including: (1) the public testimony and agenda reports prepared in connection with the proposed Ordinance, (2) the policy considerations discussed therein, and (3) the consideration and recommendation by the City’s Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

SECTION 1. Incorporation. The recitals above are true and correct and are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

SECTION 2. CEQA. This Ordinance is not a project within the meaning of Section 15378 of the State of California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), because it has no potential of resulting in a physical change in the environment, directly or indirectly. The City Council further finds, under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061(b)(3), that this Ordinance is nonetheless exempt from the requirements of CEQA in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 3: General Plan and Development Objectives. Pursuant to SPMC §

16.208.030(C), the City Council has reviewed the Planning Commission’s recommendation, and finds that the proposed amendments are consistent with the objectives of Title 16 of the SPMC, the General Plan, and development policies of the City as follows:

A. The proposed code amendment is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs of the Santa Paula General Plan (2040), as described in Section 4.A. below.
132
3 B. The purpose of Chapter 16.208 Development Code Amendments is to allow for amendment to the Development Code in recognition of the fact that physical, economic, and other conditions in the City may change over time. The proposed amendments to Chapters 16.200 Administration – General Provisions, 16.202 Applications, Processing, Filing and Fees, 16.204 Public Hearings, 16.206 Appeals and Revocations, 16.208 Development Code Amendments, 16.210 Zone Change, 16.212 General Plan Amendments,

16.214 Agricultural Preserve and Land Conservation Contracts, 16.216 Specific Plans, 16.218 Conditional Use Permits, 16.220 Variances, 16.222 Minor Modifications, 16.224 Zoning Clearance, 16.227 Accessory Dwelling Units, 16.228 Temporary Use Permit, 16.230 Home Occupation Permit, 16.234 Development Agreements, 16.236 Annexations, 16.237 81 Acre Initiative Implementation, and 16.238 Site Development Permit, recognize these changing conditions by removing inconsistencies and outdated terms, updating definitions, and aligning with the adopted General Plan and applicable state law.

SECTION 4: Development Code Amendment Findings. Pursuant to SPMC §16.208.050, the City Council makes the following required findings of fact:

A. The proposed code amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. The proposed amendment is part of larger effort to update the Santa Paula Municipal Code. The proposed amendment is largely administrative in nature intended to remove inconsistencies, typographical errors, and outdated terms in the Development Code. Nothing in the proposed amendment would create an inconsistency with the goals, policies and objectives of the 2040 General Plan.

B. The proposed code amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties.

The proposed amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties because the amendments are largely administrative in nature intended to logically renumber and remove inconsistencies and outdated terms and cross-references in the Development Code. It does not permit a particular project and does not affect zoning or land uses.

C. The proposed code amendment promote public health, safety, and general welfare and serves the goals and purposes of Title 16. The public health, safety, and general welfare will be promoted by more logical numbering for ease of use and removal of inconsistencies, typographical errors, and outdated terms in the Development Code.

SECTION 5. Code Amendment. Chapters 16.200, 16.202, 16.204, 16.206, 16.208,

16.210, 16.212, 16.214, 16.216, 16.218, 16.220, 16.222, 16.224, 16.227, 16.228, 16.230,

16.234, 16.236, 16.237, and 16.238 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code are hereby amended and restated to read in their entirety as provided in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
133
4 SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days after its adoption.

SECTION 7. Publication. The City Clerk is directed to certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and post or publish this Ordinance as required by law.

SECTION 8. Custodian of Records. The custodian of records for this Ordinance is the City Clerk and the records comprising the administrative record are located at 970 E.

Ventura Street, Santa Paula, California 93060.

SECTION 9. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or applications of the Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof. (Continues on next page)
134
5 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santa Paula, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ____ day of _____________, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF SANTA PAULA:

Pedro A. Chavez, Mayor
ATTEST:

Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
Monica Castillo, City Attorney
135

EXHIBIT A
(follows this page)
136
65283.00109\44191273.1
CHAPTER 16.54: ADMINISTRATION - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section

16.54.010 Purpose and intent

16.54.020 Type of review procedures in effect

16.54.030 Review bodies established

16.54.040 Purpose and responsibilities of the hearing bodies § 16.54.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.

This Chapters 16.54 through 16.72 (Administration of the Development Code) establishes the regulations for the effective and efficient implementation of the Santa Paula Development Code (Title 16 of the Municipal Code). Chapters 16.54 through 16.72 contain the procedures for discretionary review of development applications, criteria for acceptance of applications for discretionary actions, and general standards for processing of applications. The provisions of Chapters 16.54 through 16.72 provide for a system of development review that is open to the public and responsive to the needs of the community. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.54.020 TYPE OF REVIEW PROCEDURES IN EFFECT.

Table 54-1 outlines the types of review procedures in effect in Santa Paula. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.54.030 REVIEW BODIES ESTABLISHED.
(A) The City Council and Planning Commission will serve as hearing bodies in the City of Santa Paula.
(B) The City Council will be established as set forth in Title III, Chapter 30 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code.
(C) The Planning Commission will be established as set forth in Title III, Chapter 32 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
TABLE 5454-1
Hearing Bodies And Responsibilities
Type of Application
Director(a) Planning Commission(b) City
Council
Authority
to Approve
or Deny
Advisory to
Planning
Comm. or
City Council
Authority to
Approve or
Deny (c)
Advisory to
City Council
(c)
Final
Authority
(c)
Agricultural Preserves &
Land Consv. (See Ch.

16.61)
X X
Annexation (See Ch.

16.72) X X X (d)
Conditional Use Permit
(See Ch. 16.63) X X
Design Review (See
Ch. 16.67) X
Deleted: 16.200
Deleted: 16.200
Deleted: 16.200
Deleted: 16.200
Deleted: 16.200
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.200
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.200
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 200-1
Deleted: 200-1
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: 16.226
137
65283.00109\44191273.1
TABLE 5454-1
Hearing Bodies And Responsibilities
Type of Application
Director(a) Planning Commission(b) City
Council
Authority
to Approve
or Deny
Advisory to
Planning
Comm. or
City Council
Authority to
Approve or
Deny (c)
Advisory to
City Council
(c)
Final
Authority
(c)
Development
Agreement (See Ch.

16.71)
X X X
Development Code Text
Amendment (See Ch.

16.58)
X X X
General Plan
Amendment (See Ch.

16.60)
X X X
Home Occupation
Permit (See Ch. 16.70) X
Lot Line Adjustment
(See Ch. 16.80) X
Minor Modification (See
Ch. 16.65) X
Parcel Map (See Ch.

16.80) No dedication of
land Dedication or offer
of dedication of land
X X X
Planned Development
Permit (See Ch. 16.31) X X
Reversion to Acreage
(See Ch. 16.80) X X
Second Unit Permit
(See Ch. 16.68) X
Specific Plan (See Ch.

16.62) X X X
Temporary Use Permit
(See Ch. 16.69) X
Tract Map (See Ch.

16.80) Tentative Map
Final Map
X
X
X X
X
Tree Removal Permit
(See Ch. 16.232) X
Variance (See Ch.

16.64) X X
Zone Change (See Ch.

16.59) X X X
Zoning Clearance (See
Ch. 16.66) X
Notes: (a) All decisions of the Director are appealable to the Planning Commission. (b) All decisions of the Planning Commission are appealable to the City Council.
(c) Public Hearing Required
Deleted: 200-1
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.208
Deleted: 16.212
Deleted: 16.230
Deleted: 16.222
Deleted: 16.227
Deleted: 16.216
Deleted: 16.228
Deleted: 16.220
Deleted: 16.210
Deleted: 16.224
Deleted: Planning
138
65283.00109\44191273.1
(d) Subject to approval by LAFCO
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.54.040 PURPOSE AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE HEARING BODIES. (A) City Council. The City Council will act as the final arbiter to interpret and to ensure enforcement of the provisions of this Title 16, subject to the rules of conduct and responsibilities established by city ordinances. The City Council will be responsible for conducting the public hearings set forth in Table 54-1.
(B) Planning Commission.
(1) The Planning Commission’s responsibilities and duties with respect to the implementation and interpretation of this Title 16 will be as follows:
(a) Those responsibilities and duties described in the state planning, zoning, and development laws contained in Cal. Gov’t Code §65100 et seq. (b) Such duties as may be designated by the City Council. (2) The Planning Commission will be responsible for conducting the public hearings set forth in Table 54-1, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings) of this Title 16. (C) Community and Economic Development Director. The Director will have the authority to approve certain discretionary permits, as set forth in Table 54-1. The Director may designate a city staff member to act on his behalf. Thus, in this Chapter 16.54, the term Community and Economic Development Director will mean the Director or his designee, where such reference is made to a review, discretionary action, or approval.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.55: APPLICATIONS, PROCESSING, FILING, AND FEES Section

16.55.010 Application materials

16.55.020 Requirements for complete application

16.55.030 Application review and processing

16.55.040 Concurrent applications

16.55.050 Environmental review

16.55.060 Fees

16.55.070 Performance security

16.55.080 Application denial - Reapplication

16.55.090 Concurrent expiration of permits
§ 16.55.010 APPLICATION MATERIALS.
(A) Any person or authorized representative desiring a permit or approval required by this Title 16 shall file an application with the Director or the designee. (B) The Director shall prescribe the form in which applications shall be made permits and approvals pursuant to this Title 16. The Director may prepare and provide blank forms for such purpose and may prescribe the type of information to be submitted in the application by the applicant. (C) Information required as part of an application shall, at a minimum, include:

Deleted: 200-1
Deleted: 200-1
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 200-1
Deleted: 16.200
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
139
65283.00109\44191273.1
(1) The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the property owner and applicant;
(2) Proof of ownership;
(3) A letter of authorization from the property owner, if the applicant is other than the owner; and
(4) Address and legal description of the properties involved. (D) An application for a variance, planned development permit, conditional use permit, or design review approval shall be accompanied by a description of the proposed use or project and the information required on the submittal requirements list available in the Planning Department. (E) For applications requiring a public hearing as a scheduled matter, the applicant shall submit a list of all persons or agents owning properties within a 300-foot radius from the exterior boundaries of the subject property, or as required by law. Such list shall be accompanied by copies of all Ventura County Assessor’s maps used in preparing the list, and an affidavit certifying that the list is true and correct and has been obtained from the most recent assessment role of the Ventura County Assessor no longer than 90 days prior to the filing of the application. (F) For applications for projects involving the use of hazardous materials, the handling of solid waste, or alcohol sales and service, the applicant shall submit a list of all persons or agents owning properties within a 1,000-foot radius from the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Such list shall be accompanied by copies of all Ventura County Assessor’s maps used in preparing the list and an affidavit certifying that the list is true and correct and has been obtained from the most recent assessment role of the Ventura County Assessor no longer than 90 days prior to the filing of the application. (G) The Director may waive the filing of one or more of the items listed in subparagraph (D) above or may require other pertinent information to be submitted. (H) The accuracy of all information submitted shall be the responsibility of the applicant. (I) In the event that delays are encountered in the processing of an application, the list of surrounding property owners shall be updated to be no older than 90 days prior to the scheduled hearing date.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.55.020 REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION.

No application shall be processed until it has been deemed complete by the Director or the designee.

No application shall be deemed complete until all required information is provided in the required quantity and format.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.55.030 APPLICATION REVIEW AND PROCESSING.
(A) Within 30 days after receiving an application for a development project, the Director shall determine in writing whether an application is complete. Such a determination shall be transmitted immediately to the applicant at the address indicated on the application form. (B) If an application is determined to be incomplete, the Director shall specify those parts of the application that are incomplete, and shall indicate the manner in which they can be made complete. (C) After the Director has accepted an application as complete, the Director shall not subsequently request of an applicant any new or additional information that was not required as part of the application originally determined to be complete.
(D) The Director may in the course of processing an application, require the applicant to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the information required for the original application.

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
140
65283.00109\44191273.1
(E) Termination of incomplete application. Upon written notification to the applicant, processing of an incomplete application may be terminated if no reasonable effort has been made by the applicant to complete the application for a period of six months from the date of notification of incompleteness. All unused fees shall be refunded to the applicant. An extension to this six-month period may be granted by the Director on written request by the applicant showing good cause. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.55.040 CONCURRENT APPLICATIONS.

Whenever more than one permit or approval is required for a proposed development project or use, all applications shall be filed and processed concurrently. All such related applications shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedures set forth for the application requiring the highest level of review. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.55.050 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.

All applications deemed complete in accordance with Title 16 of this Code and, if applicable, General Plan Sections III(F) or III(G), require environmental review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §15000 et seq.). (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1188, passed 2-19-08) § 16.55.060 FEES.
(A) Each applicant for a land use action authorized by this Title 16 shall pay those fees and costs as established by resolution of the City Council. (B) At any time prior to final action on any application filed pursuant to this Title 16, the applicant, by written request filed with the Planning Department or with the City Council, if action by the Planning Department has been completed thereon, may withdraw the application and terminate further consideration thereof.
(C) Where such written request has been filed and the application withdrawn, the applicant may file a proper claim for refund of any fee paid for the filing of such application. Upon approval of the claim by the Director, the City Council may order the refund of such fee less any costs the Council may determine to have been incurred by the city incidental to action or proposed action on the application. (D) Application for refund of fees shall be made in the manner and on the form prescribed for refund authorized by the California Government Code.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.55.070 PERFORMANCE SECURITY.
(A) Whenever a Variance, Planned Development Permit, or Conditional Use Permit is granted by the Planning Commission or the City Council upon any condition or limitation, or for a limited period of time, the Commission or Council may require the applicant to furnish security in the form of money or a surety bond in an amount fixed by the Commission or Council to ensure compliance with the conditions and limitations, including the limitation of time, upon which the Variance, Planned Development Permit, or Conditional Use Permit is granted.
(B) Every such bond shall be a penalty bond in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney, payable to the City of Santa Paula, and conditioned upon compliance with the conditions and limitations, including the limitation of time, upon which such Variance, Planned Development Permit, or Conditional Use Permit is granted.
(C) Upon the breach of any condition or limitation, including the limitation of time, upon which the Variance, Planned Development Permit, or Conditional Use Permit is granted, the money or the bond Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
141
65283.00109\44191273.1
furnished as security shall be forfeited to the city, and such money or the money collected on any such bond shall be paid into the general fund of the City of Santa Paula. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.55.080 APPLICATION DENIAL - REAPPLICATION.
(A) Whenever an application or portion of an application has been denied or revoked and the denial or revocation becomes final, no new application for the same or similar request may be accepted within one year of the date of the denial, unless the Director finds that the conditions surrounding the application have sufficiently changed to warrant a new application. (B) For the purpose of this section, “changed conditions” shall mean a substantial change in land use on properties in the vicinity, improved infrastructure in the vicinity, altered traffic patterns, or any such similar change resulting in a changed physical environment. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.55.090 CONCURRENT EXPIRATION OF PERMITS.
(A) The grantee of a permit or variance shall be given a time limit as specified in this Title 16 to establish a right to use the permit or variance. Failure to exercise the right within the specified time limit shall render the permit or variance null and void.
(B) Should a property be granted with more than one permit or variance, or combination thereof, failure to exercise the right of any permit or variance within the specified time limit shall cause the concurrent expiration of all permits or variances associated with the property. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.56: PUBLIC HEARINGS
Section

16.56.010 Noticing

16.56.020 Evidence of notice

16.56.030 Failure to send notice

16.56.040 Hearing procedures
§ 16.56.010 NOTICING.
(A) For applications requiring a public hearing before the Planning Commission, such hearings shall be set by the Director. For applications requiring a public hearing before the City Council, such hearings shall be set by the City Clerk.
(B) In all cases, the first hearing shall be held within 60 days of the date on which the application has been deemed as complete, unless a longer time is required to accommodate environmental review under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. (C) Notice of the time and place of public hearings shall be given at least ten calendar days before the public hearing, as provided in this Chapter 16.56. Such notice shall include a general description of the matter to be considered and a general description of the area affected. (1) Notice of any public hearing to consider any proposed amendment to this Title 16 or any general plan amendment shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Santa Paula.
(2) Notice of any public hearing to consider an annexation, Planned Development permit, Variance, Conditional Use Permit, tentative map, specific plan or Development Agreement shall be:

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.204
142
65283.00109\44191273.1
(a) Mailed or delivered to all persons including businesses, corporations, or other public or private entities owning real property within a radius of 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property which is the subject of the proposed land use application as such owners and their addresses are shown on the current assessment roll of the Ventura County Assessor; (b) Published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the city; and
(c) Posted in conspicuous places on the property affected, in accordance with City Council Resolution 3404.
(3) Notice of any public hearing to consider any use involving the use of hazardous materials, the handling of solid waste, or off-site alcohol sales must be:
(a) Mailed or delivered to all persons including businesses, corporations, or other public or private entities owning real property within a radius of 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property which is the subject of the proposed land use application as such owners and their addresses are shown on the current assessment roll of the Ventura County Assessor; (b) Published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the city; and
(c) Posted in conspicuous places on and in the near vicinity of the property affected, in accordance with City Council Resolution 3404. (D) Where application is made for a change of zone, the Director or the Commission shall have the discretion to include in the notice of hearing on such application, notice that the Planning Commission will consider classification of other than that for which application is made. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06) § 16.56.020 EVIDENCE OF NOTICING.

When notice of a hearing is given pursuant to this Chapter 16.56, the following documentation shall be deemed sufficient to serve as proof that such notice was given:
(A) Publication. When notice is given by publication, an affidavit of publication by the newspaper in which the publication was made.
(B) Mailing. When notice is given by mail or other delivery, an affidavit or proof of mailing/delivery must be made, showing, at a minimum, the date or dates of mailing/delivery and the list of persons and groups to which the mailing/delivery was made. Failure to send notice to any property owner whose address is not on the most recent roll of the Ventura County Assessor shall not invalidate any of the proceedings.
(C) Site sign posting. When notice is posted on a property, an affidavit certifying that a notice of public hearing sign was posted on the project site must be completed at least 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing. The affidavit must also include a picture of the sign with each date change. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.56.030 FAILURE TO SEND NOTICE.

Failure to send notice to any property owner whose address is not on the most recent roll of the Ventura County Assessor shall not invalidate any of the proceedings. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.56.040 HEARING PROCEDURES.
(A) Hearing body review.

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 11
143
65283.00109\44191273.1
(1) At the public hearing, the authorized hearing body shall review the application and any pertinent materials submitted with the application, and any report prepared by the Director, the City Engineer, or other city staff based on city staff’s investigation of the application. (2) The hearing body shall cause such investigation of facts on an application set for hearing, including an analysis of precedent cases, to provide all necessary information to assure action on each case consistent with the purpose of this Title 16 and with previous similar applications.

Investigations may be made by members of the City Council, the Planning Commission, or city staff. (B) Right of persons to comment.
(1) During any public hearing, the applicant for the subject application shall have the following rights:
(a) The right to be represented;
(b) The right to provide testimony; and
(c) The right to present evidence.
(2) All other persons shall have the right to comment on any relevant aspect of the application under consideration.
(C) Action of hearing body and continuance of hearings. Following the completion of testimony at a public hearing, action shall be taken to approve, conditionally approve, deny, continue, or take under advisement the subject of the public hearing.

If the action is taken to continue or take the matter under advisement, before adjournment or recess the person presiding at such public hearing shall publicly announce the time and place to which the hearing will be continued. No further notice shall be required. (D) Effect of action. The decision of the hearing body shall be considered final unless a decision is appealed pursuant to Division 1, Chapter 16.57 (Appeals and Revocations) of this Title 16. In all cases, the City Council shall represent the final authority. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.57: APPEALS AND REVOCATIONS
Section
Division 1: Appeals

16.57.010 Jurisdiction and authorization

16.57.020 Time limit for filing an appeal

16.57.030 Stay of proceedings

16.57.040 Form for filing

16.57.050 Processing of appeals

16.57.060 Review by City Council

16.57.070 Findings

16.57.080 Noticing requirements
Division 2: Revocations

16.57.070 Right of revocation

16.57.080 Procedures

16.57.090 Findings
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.206
144
65283.00109\44191273.1
DIVISION 1: APPEALS
§ 16.57.010 JURISDICTION AND AUTHORIZATION.
(A) Appeal ofCommunity and Economic Development Director actions. All actions and decisions of the Director authorized by this Title 16 may be appealed to the Planning Commission. All such appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary. (B) Appeal of City Engineer and Building Official actions. All actions of the City Engineer and Building Official authorized by this Title 16 may be appealed to the Planning Commission. All such appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary. (C) Appeal of Planning Commission actions. All actions and decisions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title 16 may be appealed to the City Council. All such appeals must be filed in writing with the City Clerk.
(D) Persons eligible to file an appeal. Any person may appeal a decision or action of the Community and Economic Development Director, City Engineer, Building Official, or Planning Commission in accordance with the terms of this Division 1 of Chapter 16.57. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1189, passed 3-3-08) § 16.57.020 TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN APPEAL.

All appeals must be filed within 10 calendar days of the date of the rendering of the decision. If the tenth day occurs on a holiday or weekend, the appeal period is extended to the next city workday. No appeal can be accepted after the appeal period expires. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1189, passed 3-3-08) § 16.57.030 STAY OF PROCEEDINGS.

The timely filing of an effective appeal or the timely adoption by the City Council of an order of review stays a decision to which the appeal or order of review relates, pending a review of the matter. (Ord. 1189, passed 3-3-08)
§ 16.57.040 FORM FOR FILING.
(A) All appeals must be submitted in writing on a form to be provided by the city. The appeal must specifically state the grounds for the appeal and specifically state instances in which the reviewing official or body erred in reaching the determination.
(B) An appeal fee must be paid concurrent with filing of the appeal in accordance with the fee schedule established by City Council resolution.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1189, passed 3-3-08) § 16.57.050 PROCESSING OF APPEALS.

Within 14 calendar days upon receipt of an appeal, the Planning Commission Secretary (in the case of an appeal of a Community and Economic Development Director, City Engineer, or Building Official decision) or the City Clerk (in the case of an appeal of a decision by the Planning Commission) must set the matter for public hearing.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1189, passed 3-3-08) § 16.57.060 REVIEW BY CITY COUNCIL.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Division 1, the City Council may, by majority vote of its total membership and at any time before a Planning Commission decision becomes final, issue an order for a de novo review of a Planning Commission decision. Such an order must be entitled an “order of review.” The City Council may, by resolution, adopt policies and procedures for implementing this section.

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: Planning
145
65283.00109\44191273.1
(Ord. 1189, passed 3-3-08)
§ 16.57.070 FINDINGS.

All actions to affirm, reverse, or modify in whole or part any decision of the Community and Economic Development Director, City Engineer, Building Official, or Planning Commission must be made by resolution stating the findings for the affirmation, reversal, or modification. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1189, passed 3-3-08) § 16.57.080 NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of time and place of a public hearing for an appeal must be given pursuant to Chapter 16.56 of this Title 16. (Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06; Am. Ord. 1189, passed 3-3-08) DIVISION 2: REVOCATIONS
§ 16.57.070 RIGHT OF REVOCATION.

Upon determination that there has been a violation of the terms or conditions of any permit or approval granted under this Title 16; or if a determination is made that a permit or approval was obtained by deception or fraud, or represents a public nuisance; or the use subject to the approval no longer exists; or the permit or approval has not been activated in accordance with the terms of this Title 16, the Director shall have the authority to initiate revocation proceedings. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.57.080 PROCEDURES.
(A) The Director shall schedule a hearing before the Planning Commission for the purpose of considering revocation of the permit or approval. In the case where the Planning Commission’s original action consisted of a recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission’s action on the revocation shall also consist of a recommendation to the City Council, and the City Council shall have the authority to revoke the permit or approval.
(B) At least 30 days prior to the revocation hearing, the permittee subject to the revocation hearing shall be given written notice of the city’s intent to conduct the hearing. The notice to the permittee shall be served either in person or by registered mail, return receipt requested. (C) At least ten calendar days prior to the revocation hearing, public notice of the hearing shall be given in the same manner as was required for the original permit or approval. (D) At the hearing, the Director shall present evidence supporting the motion for permit or approval revocation. The owner of the property, use, or business subject to the hearing shall be given the opportunity to present reasons why the permit or approval shall not be revoked. (E) The public shall be given the opportunity for comment. (F) The Planning Commission or City Council shall make a decision regarding the revocation based upon the information presented at the hearing and shall within 20 days of the hearing make findings and report its decision in writing. A copy of the decision shall be mailed via certified mail, or similar method providing proof of delivery, to the party whose permit is being revoked. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.57.090 FINDINGS.

Prior to revoking a permit or an approval adopted under this Development Code, the following findings must be made:
(A) The permit or approval was obtained by deception or fraud; (B) The permit or approval represents a public nuisance; Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
146
65283.00109\44191273.1
(C) The use subject to the approval no longer exists; or (D) The permit or approval has not been activated in accordance with the terms of this Title

16. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.58: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
Section

16.58.010 Purpose and intent

16.58.020 Initiation

16.58.030 Proceedings – Planning Commission

16.58.040 Proceedings – City Council

16.58.050 Findings required
§ 16.58.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.

In recognition of the fact that physical, economic, and other conditions in the city may change over time, provisions are hereby made to allow for amendments to the Development Code text in accord with the procedures outlined in this Chapter 16.58. All such Development Code text amendments shall be adopted in the manner in which other city ordinances are adopted. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.58.020 INITIATION.

Amendments to this Development Code may be initiated by:
(A) An application by an owner or agent of such owner seeking an amendment, supplement to, or change of the regulations prescribed for his property or the reclassification of his property; (B) The application of a person authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain; (C) The Community and Economic Development Director;
(D) The Planning Commission; or
(E) The City Council.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.58.030 PROCEEDINGS - PLANNING COMMISSION.
(A) A public hearing before the Planning Commission shall be noticed and conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings). (B) At the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall review the application and proposal and receive evidence as to how or why the proposed Development Code text amendment is consistent with the objectives of this Title 16, the General Plan, and development policies of the city. (C) The Planning Commission shall act by resolution to recommend to the City Council approval, approval with modifications, or denial of the proposed application. (D) The Commission’s resolution shall include its recommendation and shall be transmitted to the City Clerk for scheduling the matter for consideration by the City Council. (E) A proposed amendment to the Development Code that is not consistent with the General Plan may not be recommended or adopted until the General Plan is amended to eliminate such Deleted: 2
Deleted: 20
Deleted: 2
Deleted: 20
Deleted: 2
Deleted: 20
Deleted: 2
Deleted: 20
Deleted: 2
Deleted: 20
Deleted: 16.208
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.204
147
65283.00109\44191273.1
inconsistency. Such a General Plan amendment and any development proposal relying on the amendment shall be considered concurrently.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.58.040 PROCEEDINGS - CITY COUNCIL.
(A) Upon receipt of a Planning Commission resolution recommending approval or denial of a Development Code text amendment, the City Clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the City Council, notice of which shall be given as prescribed in Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings) of this Title 16. (B) At the hearing, the City Council shall review the Commission’s recommendation and receive evidence as to how or why the proposed Development Code text amendment is consistent with the objectives of this Title 16, the General Plan, and development policies of the city. (C) If the Council proposes any substantial modification to the application not previously considered by the Planning Commission, the Council shall refer the matter back to the Commission for consideration. No public hearing shall be required. Failure of the Commission to act within 40 days of receiving the Council’s request shall provide the Council with authority to act without the Commission’s recommendation.
(D) The Council shall order the amendment of this Title 16 or deny the application or recommendation for the amendment by a majority vote of the City Council. (E) Following the decision of the City Council ordering amendment of this Title or denying the application or recommendation for the amendment, the city shall give notice of said decision in writing to the applicant at the address shown on the application and to the Planning Commission. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.58.050 FINDINGS REQUIRED.

The City Council shall be required to make the following findings of fact before approving a Development Code text amendment:
(A) That the proposed Development Code text amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan; and
(B) That the proposed Development Code text amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties; and
(C) That the proposed Development Code text amendment promotes public health, safety, and general welfare and serves the goals and purposes of this Title 16. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.59: ZONE CHANGE
Section

16.59.010 Purpose and intent

16.59.020 Initiation

16.59.030 Proceedings – Planning Commission

16.59.040 Proceedings – City Council

16.59.050 Findings required
§ 16.59.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.

In recognition of the fact that physical, economic, and other conditions in the city may change over time, provisions are hereby made to allow for amendments to the zoning map in accord with the Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 16.210
Deleted: 16.210
Deleted: 16.210
Deleted: 16.210
Deleted: 16.210
148
65283.00109\44191273.1
procedures outlined in this Chapter 16.59. All such zone changes shall be adopted in the manner in which other city ordinances are adopted.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.59.020 INITIATION.

Amendments to the zoning map may be initiated by:
(A) An application by an owner or agent of such owner seeking an amendment, supplement to, or change of, the regulations prescribed for his property or the reclassification of his property; (B) The application of a person authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain; (C) TheCommunity and Economic Development Director;
(D) The Planning Commission; or
(E) The City Council.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.59.030 PROCEEDINGS - PLANNING COMMISSION.
(A) A public hearing before the Planning Commission shall be noticed and conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings). (B) At the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall review the application and proposal and receive evidence as to how or why the proposed zone change is consistent with the objectives of this Title 16, the General Plan, and development policies of the city. (C) The Planning Commission shall act by resolution to recommend to the City Council approval, approval with modifications, or denial of the proposed application. (D) The Commission’s resolution shall include its recommendation and shall be transmitted to the City Clerk for scheduling the matter for consideration by the City Council. (E) A proposed zone change that is not consistent with the General Plan may not be recommended or adopted until the General Plan is amended to eliminate such inconsistency. Such a General Plan amendment and any development proposal relying on the amendment shall be considered concurrently.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.59.040 PROCEEDINGS - CITY COUNCIL.
(A) Denial of a zone change. Upon receipt of a Planning Commission resolution recommending denial of a zone change, the City Clerk shall place the Commission’s resolution on the City Council agenda as a receive-and-file item. The Commission’s decision shall be considered final and no further action by the Council will be required unless an appeal is filed within ten calendar days of the Commission’s decision in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16.57 (Appeals and Revocations) of this Title 16, or unless the Council chooses to set the matter for hearing. (B) Approval of a zone change.
(1) Upon receipt of a Planning Commission resolution recommending approval of a zone change, the City Clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the City Council, notice of which shall be given as prescribed in Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings) of this Title 16. (2) At the hearing, the City Council shall review the Commission’s recommendation and receive evidence as to how or why the proposed zone change is consistent with the objectives of this Title 16, the General Plan, and development policies of the city. (3) If the Council proposes any substantial modification to the application not previously considered by the Planning Commission, the Council shall refer the matter back to the Deleted: 16.210
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.204
149
65283.00109\44191273.1
Commission for consideration. No public hearing shall be required. Failure of the Commission to act within 40 days of receiving the Council’s request shall provide the Council with authority to act without the Commission’s recommendation.
(4) The Council shall order the zone change to be enacted or deny the application or recommendation for the zone change by a majority vote of the City Council. (5) Following the decision of the City Council ordering enactment of the zone change requested by this application or recommendation by the Planning Commission for denial of the zone change, the city shall give notice of the decision to the applicant in writing at the address shown on the application and to the Planning Commission.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.59.050 FINDINGS REQUIRED.

The City Council shall be required to make the following findings of fact before approving a zone change:
(A) That the proposed zone change is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan; and
(B) That the proposed zone change will not adversely or significantly impact surrounding properties; and
(C) That the proposed zone change promotes public health, safety, and general welfare and serves the goals and purposes of this Title 16.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.60: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
Section

16.60.010 Purpose and intent

16.60.020 Initiation

16.60.030 Proceedings – Planning Commission

16.60.040 Proceedings – City Council

16.60.050 Findings required
§ 16.60.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.

This Chapter 16.60 is established pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code 65358 to allow for amendment from time to time of the city’s General Plan.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.60.020 INITIATION.
(A) Applications to amend the General Plan text or maps may be initiated by any person who is able to demonstrate a legal vested interest in the proposed application. The authorized agent of any person with a legal vested interest may also initiate an application. The Director may request proof of ownership or authorization to apply prior to the acceptance of any application. (B) In the case of a proposed amendment to the General Plan land use policy map, if the property for which the amendment is proposed is in more than one ownership, the majority of owners or their authorized agents shall be required to sign the application. (C) The City Council or the Planning Commission may initiate an application to amend the General Plan.

Deleted: H
Deleted: 16.212
Deleted: 16.212
Deleted: 16.212
Deleted: 16.212
Deleted: 16.212
Deleted: 16.212
Deleted: Planning
150
65283.00109\44191273.1
(D) No more than four General Plan amendments may be initiated in any one calendar year.

Applications by members of the public for such amendments will be considered by the City Council in March, June, September and December of each calendar year. All applications will be processed individually until being forwarded to the City Council. Applications may be combined as necessary to comply with the limited number of times amendments may be considered under state law. The Planning Commission or City Council may initiate an amendment at any time provided the number of amendments to any element of the general plan shall not exceed that allowed by state law. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.60.030 PROCEEDINGS - PLANNING COMMISSION.
(A) A public hearing before the Planning Commission shall be noticed and conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings). (B) At the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall review the application and proposal and receive evidence as to how or why the proposed General Plan amendment is consistent with the objectives of this Title 16, the balance of the General Plan, and development policies of the city. (C) The Planning Commission shall act by resolution to recommend to the City Council approval, approval with modifications, or denial of the proposed application. A majority vote of the entire Planning Commission is required to recommend approval or approval with modifications. (D) The Commission’s resolution shall include its recommendation and shall be transmitted to the City Clerk for scheduling the matter for public hearing before the City Council. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.60.040 PROCEEDINGS - CITY COUNCIL.
(A) Upon receipt of a Planning Commission resolution, the City Clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the City Council as provided for in Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings) of this Title 16. (B) At the hearing, the City Council shall review the Commission’s recommendation and may receive evidence as to how or why the proposed General Plan amendment is consistent with the objectives of this Title 16, the balance of the General Plan, and development policies of the city. (C) The City Council shall act to approve or deny the application. A majority vote of the entire Council is required to amend the General Plan. The Council’s action to amend the General Plan shall be by formal resolution.
(D) If the City Council proposes any substantial modification to the application not previously considered by the Planning Commission, the Council shall refer the matter back to the Commission for consideration. No public hearing shall be required. Failure of the Commission to act within 45 days of receiving the Council’s request shall provide the Council with authority to act without the Commission’s recommendation.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.60.050 FINDINGS REQUIRED.

Before approving, or conditionally approving, a General Plan amendment, the City Council must make the following findings:
(A) That the proposed amendment is in the public interest, and that there will be a community benefit resulting from the amendment;
(B) That the proposed amendment is consistent with the other goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan;
(C) That the proposed amendment does not conflict with provisions of this Code; Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 16.204
151
65283.00109\44191273.1
(D) In the event that the proposed amendment is a change to the land use policy map, that the amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties; and (E) Whether the amendment requires voter approval in accordance with either General Plan Section III(F) (the SOAR Initiative) or General Plan Section III(G) (the 81 Acre Initiative). Amendments requiring voter approval cannot become effective without an affirmative vote from a majority of registered voters at a regular or special election.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1188, passed 2-19-08) CHAPTER 16.61: AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE AND LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACTS Section

16.61.010 Purpose

16.61.020 Definitions

16.61.030 Relationship to other laws

16.61.040 Criteria for establishing, disestablishing or altering agricultural preserves

16.61.050 Land owner proposals to establish, disestablish or alter an agricultural preserve

16.61.060 Notice and hearing requirements

16.61.070 Recording revised agricultural preserve map

16.61.080 Application process and fees - conservation contracts

16.61.090 Report to City Council

16.61.100 Criteria for evaluating land conservation contract applications

16.61.110 Recording of contracts

16.61.120 General

16.61.130 Compatible uses - Agricultural use contracts

16.61.140 Compatible uses - Open space use contracts

16.61.150 Compatible uses - Compatible use determination

16.61.160 General provisions

16.61.170 Notice of nonrenewal

16.61.180 Contract cancellation

16.61.190 Contract compliance monitoring

16.61.200 Contract violations

16.61.210 Judicial relief
§ 16.61.010 PURPOSE.

This chapter is adopted pursuant to the city’s police powers, as set forth in the California Constitution, and in accordance with the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 for the purpose of establishing the procedural and substantive requirements to implement the Act. (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
Deleted: 16.214
152
65283.00109\44191273.1
§ 16.61.020 DEFINITIONS.

Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following definitions will govern the construction of the words and phrases used in this chapter. Words and phrases not defined by this chapter have the meanings stated in the Act.

ACT means the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, also known as the Williamson Act, set forth at Cal. Gov’t Code §51200 et seq.

AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY has the same meaning as Cal. Gov’t Code 51201 (a): any and all plant and animal products produced in California for commercial purposes.

AGRICULTURAL USE has the same meaning as Cal. Gov’t Code 51201(b): the use of the land for the purpose of producing an agricultural commodity for commercial purposes.

COMPATIBLE USE means any use determined by the city to be compatible with the agricultural, recreational, or open-space use of land within the preserve and subject to contract. COMPATIBLE USE includes agricultural use, recreational use or open- space use unless Council finds after notice and hearing that the use is not compatible with the agricultural, recreational or open-space use to which the land is restricted by contract pursuant to this chapter or the Act.

CONTRACTED LAND means real property restricted by a land conservation contract pursuant to the Act and this chapter. INCIDENTAL means related to or supporting the primary agricultural, open space or recreational use of the land.

NONPRIME AGRICULTURAL LAND means any land capable of sustaining a commercial agricultural use that is not prime agricultural land.

OPEN-SPACE USE has the same meaning as Cal. Gov’t Code 51201(o).

PRIME AGRICULTURAL LAND has the same meaning as Cal. Gov’t Code 51201 (c).

RECREATIONAL USE has the same meaning as Cal. Gov’t Code 51201(n). (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.030 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAWS.

If there is any irreconcilable conflict between any provisions of this chapter and any federal or state law, the federal or state law prevails. Any provision of this chapter that is more stringent than federal or state law is intended to supplement, not conflict with, federal or state law and to apply unless a court of law conclusively determines that the provision is preempted. (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.040 CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING, DISESTABLISHING OR ALTERING AGRICULTURAL PRESERVES.

All of the following criteria apply to the establishment, disestablishment or alteration of an agricultural preserve, whether initiated by the city or a land owner:
(A) Each agricultural preserve must contain at least 100 contiguous acres of land unless the City Council finds that a smaller preserve is necessary due to the unique characteristics of the agricultural enterprises in the area and that such preserve is consistent with the city’s general plan and zoning regulations.
(B) The use of any land within an agricultural preserve that is subject to a land conservation contract must be restricted by zoning that is compatible with the agricultural, open space or recreational use. Such zoning restrictions include appropriate minimum parcel sizes consistent with the Act and this chapter.
(C) All agricultural preserves must comply with the city’s general plan and zoning regulations. (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
153
65283.00109\44191273.1
§ 16.61.050 LAND OWNER PROPOSALS TO ESTABLISH, DISESTABLISH OR ALTER AN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE.
(A) A landowner whose property is devoted to agricultural, open space or recreational use, but is not within an established agricultural preserve, may apply to have the property included in a new or existing agricultural preserve. To initiate this process, the land owner must file an application with the City Clerk on a form prepared by the City Manager or designee. (B) A landowner whose property is included in an agricultural preserve and who wishes to have that property excluded from an agricultural preserve may apply to disestablish or alter the boundaries of the agricultural preserve in which the property is located to exclude the property. To initiate this process, the land owner must file an application prepared by the City Manager, or designee, with the City Clerk.
(C) Any application submitted pursuant to this section must be accompanied by a payment of all applicable fees prescribed by City Council resolution. (D) Within 30 days of receiving a complete application, the Director, or designee, will prepare a report for City Council consideration regarding whether the landowner’s proposal meets the Act’s requirements. The City Council will consider the report during a public hearing held in accordance with this chapter.
(E) No application submitted pursuant to this section will be approved by the City Council unless it meets all of the criteria in this chapter and the Act. (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.060 NOTICE AND HEARING REQUIREMENTS.
(A) A noticed public hearing will be held before any final action is taken to establish, disestablish or alter the boundary of any agricultural preserve. (B) Notice of the public hearing to establish or alter an agricultural preserve must be provided as follows:
(1) By publication pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code 6061;
(2) By written, mailed notice at least two weeks before the hearing to the Ventura County Local Agency Formation Commission;
(3) By written, mailed notice at least two weeks before the hearing to any city within one mile of the exterior boundaries of the agricultural preserve proposed to be established, disestablished or altered;
(4) By written, mailed notice to the applicant; and
(5) If land under contract is to be removed from an agricultural preserve or a preserve disestablished that contains land under contract, notice must be given in compliance with Cal.

Gov’t Code 51232.
(Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.070 RECORDING REVISED AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE MAP.

Whenever an agricultural preserve is established, disestablished or altered, the City Clerk will file the adopted resolution and a map showing all of the city agricultural preserves, as revised, with the County Recorder.
(Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
Deleted: Planning
154
65283.00109\44191273.1
§ 16.61.080 APPLICATION PROCESS AND FEES - CONSERVATION CONTRACTS. (A) A land owner whose property is devoted to agricultural, open space or recreational use and is within an agricultural preserve may file an application with the city clerk on a form prepared by the Director, or designee, to restrict the owner’s land by a land conservation contract. An application must be accompanied by all of the following:
(1) All applicable fees as prescribed by City Council resolution; and (2) A land conservation contract in a form prepared by the City Attorney and approved by the City Council for the particular use (agricultural, open space or recreational) with notarized signatures of all land owners.
(B) The city may request additional information from the land owner during the application review process to facilitate a thorough and timely review of the application. (C) Applications to simultaneously rescind a land conservation contract and reenter into a new contract restricting the use of the land pursuant to the Act or any other state law will be considered where authorized by state law.
(Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.090 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL.
(A) Upon receipt of an application for a land conservation contract, the City Clerk will transmit a copy of the completed application to the Director.
(B) The Director, or designee, will prepare a report for City Council consideration regarding whether the land subject to the proposed land conservation contract meets the criteria in the Act and this chapter for such a contract.
(Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.100 CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT APPLICATIONS. (A) No application for a land conservation contract will be approved unless all of the following criteria are met:
(1) Each parcel affected by the proposed contract is at least 10 acres in size in the case of prime agricultural land and 40 acres in size in the case of nonprime agricultural land or land in open space or recreational use;
(2) All parcels affected by the proposed contract are currently being used primarily for agricultural, open space or recreational use; and
(3) There are no other existing or permitted uses or development on the land that would significantly displace or interfere with the agricultural, open space or recreational use of the land. (B) Even if all of the above criteria are met, the City Council may, in its discretion, choose not to approve the application.
(Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.110 RECORDING OF CONTRACTS.

The City Clerk must record any executed land conservation contract with the County Recorder within 20 days after it is fully executed.
(Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
155
65283.00109\44191273.1
§ 16.61.120 GENERAL.

The use and development of all land affected by a land conservation contract must at all times comply with the Act, this chapter, the terms of the land conservation contract, and any other applicable state or local law, regulation or ordinance.
(Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.130 COMPATIBLE USES - AGRICULTURAL USE CONTRACTS. (A) All use or development of any contracted land for agricultural use must comply with the following criteria:
(1) The proposed use or development must be compatible with and not significantly compromise the long-term productive agricultural capability of any contracted land within the agricultural preserve, including the land upon which the use or development is proposed to occur; (2) The proposed use of development will not significantly displace or impair current or reasonably foreseeable agricultural operations on the land upon which the use or development is proposed to occur. A use or development that significantly displaces agricultural operations on the land upon which the use or development is proposed to occur may, in the city’s discretion, be deemed compatible if the uses or development relate directly to the production of commercial agricultural products on that parcel or nearby parcels (e.g., harvesting, processing or shipping of locally produced commercial agricultural products).
(3) The proposed use or development will not substantially interfere with the agricultural use of the land upon which the use or development is proposed to occur; (4) The portion of the parcel to remain in agricultural use must be capable of sustaining a commercially viable agricultural use. For prime agricultural land, at least ten acres must remain devoted to agricultural use. For nonprime agricultural land, at least 40 acres must remain devoted to agricultural use;
(5) The proposed use or development will not hinder or impair agricultural operations in the area by significantly increasing the permanent or temporary human population in the area; (6) The proposed use or development does not constitute a residential subdivision; and
(7) The proposed use or development complies with all other federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances, including the city’s general plan and this code. (B) An agricultural preserve may contain land other than agricultural land, but within two years of the effective date of any contract on land within the preserve, the use of any land within the preserve and not under contract must be restricted by zoning (including minimum parcel sizes that are consistent with the Act) in such a way as not to be incompatible with the agricultural use of the lands limited by contract within the preserve.
(C) All permitted uses set forth in this code for the agricultural zone (A-1) are deemed compatible with agricultural use if all of the criteria in this section are also met. (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.140 COMPATIBLE USES - OPEN SPACE USE CONTRACTS. (A) All use or development of any contracted land for open space use must comply with all of the following criteria:
(1) The proposed use or development must be compatible with and not significantly compromise the agricultural, open space or recreational value of any contracted land within the agricultural preserve, including the land upon which the use or development is proposed to occur; (2) The portion of the parcel to remain in open space must be at least 40 acres; 156
65283.00109\44191273.1
(3) The proposed use or development does not constitute a residential subdivision; (4) The proposed use or development complies with all other federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances, including the city general plan and municipal code. (B) All permitted uses set forth in this code for the open space zone (O) are deemed compatible with open space use if all of the criteria in this section are also met. (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.150 COMPATIBLE USES - COMPATIBLE USE DETERMINATION. (A) Before undertaking any development or use on contracted land that is not the primary use (agricultural or open space) for which the land conservation contract for the property was approved, the land owner must apply for and obtain a compatible use determination. The land owner must file an application with the Director on a form prepared for this purpose, accompanied by a fee in an amount prescribed by resolution of the City Council.
(B) The Director will determine whether the proposed use or development is compatible with the land conservation contract for the property, using the criteria established in Cal. Gov’t Code 51238.1 and any applicable provisions of this code.
(C) The Director’s decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission by any interested person. Any appeal must be filed within 15 days of the decision and must be accompanied by payment of an appeal fee in an amount prescribed by City Council resolution. (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.160 GENERAL PROVISIONS.

A land conservation contract may only be terminated in a manner consistent with state law and this chapter.
(Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.170 NOTICE OF NONRENEWAL.
(A) If either the landowner or the city desires in any year not to renew a land conservation contract, the nonrenewing party must serve written notice of nonrenewal of the contract upon the other party before the annual nonrenewal date of the contract. A notice of nonrenewal served by the land owner must be addressed to the City Clerk and be filed or postmarked at least 90 days before the annual renewal date of the contract, and must be accompanied by a fee in an amount established by City Council resolution. A notice of nonrenewal served by the city will be mailed to the address shown on the latest assessment roll for the property, and must be postmarked at least 60 days before the annual renewal date of the contract.
(B) If no notice of nonrenewal is filed in compliance with these deadlines, the contract will be automatically renewed for another year.
(C) If a notice of nonrenewal is filed after the application deadline, the notice will be deemed to apply to the next annual renewal period.
(D) If a land owner objects to a contract nonrenewal initiated by the city applicable to the owner’s land, the owner may file a written protest with the City Clerk. The City Council may, in its discretion, withdraw the notice of nonrenewal at any time before the contract’s annual renewal date. (E) During November of each calendar year, the City Clerk will provide a report to the City Council identifying all nonrenewal requests received pursuant to this section. (F) The City Clerk will record all notices of nonrenewal with the County Recorder within 20 days after serving or receiving a notice of nonrenewal. (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
157
65283.00109\44191273.1
§ 16.61.180 CONTRACT CANCELLATION.

Any petition to cancel a land conservation contract must be filed with the City Clerk. The petition will be processed in accordance with the Act.
(Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.190 CONTRACT COMPLIANCE MONITORING.

The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to investigate any potential land conservation contract violations. If an investigation concludes that a likely contract violation exists, the City Attorney may prosecute such violations in accordance with Cal. Gov’t Code §15250 or 51251, and this code. (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.200 CONTRACT VIOLATIONS.

Land conservation contract violations include, without limitation, the following:
(A) Construction of a commercial, industrial or residential building that is not allowed by this chapter or the contract;
(B) Construction of a commercial, industrial or residential building that is not related to an agricultural or compatible use where the total area of all of the building or buildings exceeds 2,500 square feet for all property subject to any contract or all contiguous property subject to a contract or contracts owned by the same landowner or landowners.
(Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04)
§ 16.61.210 JUDICIAL RELIEF.
(A) In addition to any other remedies provided by state law or this chapter, if the city determines that a land conservation contract has or is being violated, the City Attorney is authorized to bring an action on the city’s behalf for an appropriate remedy. (B) An owner of contracted land may bring an action to enforce a land conservation contract covering any land within one mile of the owner’s contracted land. (C) Nothing in this chapter is intended to limit a court’s ability to grant any relief or issue any order that it deems appropriate in its discretion, including without limitation specific performance or injunctive or equitable relief. (Ord. 1108, passed 6-21-04) CHAPTER 16.62: SPECIFIC PLANS
Section

16.62.010 Purpose and intent

16.62.020 Initiation

16.62.030 Pre-application conference required

16.62.040 Preparation and content

16.62.050 Proceedings - Planning Commission

16.62.060 Proceedings - City Council

16.62.070 Findings required

16.62.080 Amendments to an approved Specific Plan
Deleted: 16.216
Deleted: 16.216
Deleted: 16.216
Deleted: 16.216
Deleted: 16.216
Deleted: 16.216
Deleted: 16.216
Deleted: 16.216
158
65283.00109\44191273.1
§ 16.62.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.

The city recognizes that certain parcels in Santa Paula may benefit from focused planning efforts whereby infrastructure, land use relationships, land use intensities, and public service needs can be carefully examined and planned in a comprehensive manner. The Specific Plan provides a mechanism to carry out such planning efforts. The purpose of this Chapter 16.62 is to establish uniform procedures and guidelines for Specific Plans prepared pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.62.020 INITIATION.
(A) A Specific Plan application may be initiated by a majority of the property owners in the area of a proposed Specific Plan.
(B) The City Council or Planning Commission may initiate an application for a Specific Plan. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06) § 16.62.030 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REQUIRED.

A pre-application conference with the Director is required prior to the formal submission of a Specific Plan application. The purpose of the meeting is to review with the applicant the city’s requirements for specific plan content, applicable policies, infrastructure needs, and other information as determined by the Director.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.62.040 PREPARATION AND CONTENT.

In addition to a formal application completed pursuant to Chapter 16.55 (Applications, Processing, Filing, and Fees), the applicant shall:
(A) Submit a draft Specific Plan containing text and diagrams that specify the following in detail:
(1) A boundary survey map of the property. A tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the applicant proposes to subdivide the property. (2) Topography of the property and the preliminary proposed finished grade shown at contour intervals of five feet or less.
(3) The gross land area of the proposed development, the present zoning classification of the proposed development, and the zoning classification and land use of the area surrounding the proposed development, including the location of structures and other improvements. (4) A general land use map setting forth the proposed uses of all sections or areas within the subject property and the approximate acreage of each. (5) An accompanying report setting forth the land use regulations that constitute the standards of development designed to govern those sections or areas specified in the Specific Plan.

These standards shall contain definitions and information concerning the requirements for building site coverage, building heights, building setbacks, off-street parking, vehicular access, signing, lighting, storage, screening, landscaping, conservation, utilization of natural resources, and other information which the Director shall require to insure compliance with the purposes of this Development Code. (6) The proposed distribution, location, and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and needed to support the land uses described in the plan.
(B) Include a statement in the Specific Plan indicating that the Plan is either:

Deleted: 16.216
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: Planning
159
65283.00109\44191273.1
(1) Consistent with the Santa Paula General Plan; or
(2) Will be consistent with the Santa Paula General Plan if amended to provide for this particular plan. A statement as to how the proposed zone change and General Plan amendment will further the goals and objectives of the city’s General Plan shall be included. (C) Include any other information as may be required by the Director to permit complete analysis and appraisal of the proposed Specific Plan.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06) § 16.62.050 PROCEEDINGS - PLANNING COMMISSION.
(A) A public hearing before the Planning Commission shall be noticed and conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings). (B) At the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall review the application and proposal and receive evidence as to how or why the proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the objectives of this Title 16, the General Plan, and development policies of the city. (C) The Planning Commission shall act by resolution to recommend to the City Council approval, approval with modifications, or denial of the proposed application. A majority vote of the entire Planning Commission is required to recommend approval or approval with modifications. (D) The Commission’s resolution shall include its recommendation and shall be transmitted to the City Clerk for scheduling the matter for public hearing before the City Council. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06) § 16.62.060 PROCEEDINGS - CITY COUNCIL.
(A) Upon receipt of a Planning Commission resolution, the City Clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the City Council as provided for in Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings) of this Title 16. (B) At the hearing, the City Council shall review the Commission’s recommendation and may receive evidence as to how or why the proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the objectives of this Title 16, the General Plan, and development policies of the city. (C) The City Council shall act to approve or deny the application. A majority vote of the entire Council is required to approve a Specific Plan. The Council’s action to approve a Specific Plan shall be by ordinance.
(D) If the City Council proposes any substantial modification to the application not previously considered by the Planning Commission, the Council shall refer the matter back to the Commission for consideration. No public hearing shall be required. Failure of the Commission to act within 45 days of receiving the Council’s request shall provide the Council with authority to act without the Commission’s recommendation.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06) § 16.62.070 FINDINGS REQUIRED.

Prior to approving a Specific Plan, the City Council shall make the findings:
(A) That the proposed Specific Plan or amendment promotes public health, safety, and general welfare, and serves the goals and purposes of this Title 16; (B) That the proposed Specific Plan or amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan; and
(C) That the proposed Specific Plan or amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06) Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 16.204
160
65283.00109\44191273.1
§ 16.62.080 AMENDMENTS TO AN APPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN.
(A) An approved Specific Plan may be amended in the same manner required for initial applications for a Specific Plan, as set forth in this Chapter 16.62. (B) No application for a Specific Plan amendment will be accepted unless accompanied by a development proposal for all or a portion of the area included within the proposed amendment area. (C) The city may initiate amendments to any portion of a Specific Plan. In the case of such a city- initiated amendment, no associated project is required. (D) The following changes to a Specific Plan shall require a Specific Plan amendment:
(1) Changes to the text or maps other than the addition of information that does not change the effect of any regulation.
(2) Changes in any Specific Plan boundary.
(3) Increase or decrease in the specified density for any area. (4) Changes in standards or regulations, including landscaping and design standards.

Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06) CHAPTER 16.63: CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
Section

16.63.010 Purpose and intent

16.63.020 Initiation

16.63.030 Proceedings

16.63.040 Required Findings

16.63.050 Additional findings for specified uses

16.63.060 Conditions of approval

16.63.070 Conditional Use Permit attached to the property

16.63.080 Suspension and revocation

16.63.090 Time limit for implementing Conditional Use Permit § 16.63.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.
(A) The city recognizes that certain uses, due to the nature of use, intensity, or size, require special review to determine if the use proposed, or the location of that use, is compatible with surrounding uses, or through the imposition of development and use conditions, can be made compatible with surrounding uses. The Conditional Use Permit is provided for this purpose. (B) To ensure consistency with land use regulations and compatibility with surrounding properties, conditional uses require special consideration. The Planning Commission is empowered to grant and deny applications for Conditional Use Permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of such permit.
(C) Applications for Conditional Use Permits may be submitted only for those uses specified as allowable conditional uses in the applicable zone district, unless the Director makes a preliminary finding that the proposed uses are similar to a listed use. A Conditional Use Permit is not a substitute for a zone change or Development Code text amendment.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
Deleted: 16.216
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: Planning
161
65283.00109\44191273.1
§ 16.63.020 INITIATION.
(A) An application for a Conditional Use Permit may be initiated by any person who is able to demonstrate a legal vested interest in the proposed application. The authorized agent of any person with a legal vested interest may also initiate an application. The Director may request proof of ownership or authorization to apply prior to the acceptance of any application. (B) An application shall be filed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.55 (Applications, Processing, Filing, and Fees) of this Title 16.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.63.030 PROCEEDINGS.
(A) Community and Economic Development Director investigation. The Director or the designee shall investigate the application and proposal, and shall prepare a report outlining facts and a recommendation relating to the application. The report shall be provided to the Planning Commission prior to any scheduled public hearing on the application. (B) Planning Commission proceedings.
(1) A public hearing before the Planning Commission shall be noticed and conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings) of this Title 16. (2) At the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall review the application and proposal and receive evidence concerning the proposed use and the proposed conditions under which it would be operated or maintained, particularly with respect to the findings prescribed in 16.63.040 (Required Findings).
(3) The Planning Commission shall act to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application.
(4) The decision of the Planning Commission shall become effective immediately upon its rendering, unless an appeal is filed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.57 (Appeals and Revocations) of this Title 16.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.63.040 REQUIRED FINDINGS.
(A) The Planning Commission may approve and/or modify a Conditional Use Permit in whole or in part, with or without conditions, provided that all of the following findings of fact are made:
(1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary or desirable to provide a service or facility that will contribute to the general convenience or welfare of the neighborhood or the community;
(2) The characteristics of the proposed use are not unreasonably incompatible with the types of use permitted in the surrounding areas;
(3) The proposed use is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs of the Santa Paula General Plan; and
(4) The proposed use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity.
(B) Additional findings shall be made for specific uses as required by Chapters 16.25 through

16.38 (Standards for Specific Land Uses) of this Title 16. (C) In determining the presence of conditions specified in subsection 16.63.040(A) above, the Planning Commission or, on appeal, the City Council, shall consider the following factors:

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 54
Deleted: 76
Deleted: 16.218
162
65283.00109\44191273.1
(1) Possible damage or nuisance from noise, glare, smoke, odor, fumes, dust, or vibration;
(2) Possible hazard to persons or property from explosion, contamination, or fire; and
(3) Possible hazard or inconvenience caused by unusual volume or character of traffic.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.63.050 ADDITIONAL FINDINGS FOR SPECIFIED USES.
(A) This section shall apply only to the uses identified in this section. This section shall not invalidate any Conditional Use Permit for an operating facility, but shall be complied with prior to issuance of a building permit for all projects for which no building permit has been issued upon the effective date of this provision.
(B) In addition to findings required in subsection 16.63.040(A), the Planning Commission shall find that the proposed use does not have a disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effect on minority and low-income populations. Such findings must be made for the following uses:
(1) Solid waste facilities, as defined in Cal. Pub. Res. Code 40194. (2) Auto wrecking or salvage yards.
(3) Yards for the disposal and/or salvage of demolition or construction waste. (4) Recycling facilities.
(5) Incinerators of any type.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.63.060 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
(A) In granting a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission may impose such conditions as it deems necessary to ensure that the public health, safety, and general welfare are protected and that the proposed operation is not a detriment to the community. (B) All conditions shall be binding upon the applicant, heirs, successors, or assignees and shall restrict the construction, location, maintenance, and use of all land within the development. (C) A deed restriction may be recorded with the County Recorder of Ventura County, as approved by the City Attorney, regarding the conditions of this section and other requirements of the Conditional Use Permit.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.63.070 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ATTACHED TO THE PROPERTY.

A Conditional Use Permit that is valid and in effect and granted pursuant to the provisions of this Title 16 shall be valid only on the property for which it was granted and shall continue to be valid upon change of ownership of the property or any lawfully existing building or structure on the property. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.63.080 SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION.

The Director shall have the authority to initiate proceedings to suspend or revoke a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to provisions set forth in Division 2 of Chapter 16.57 (Appeals and Revocations) of this Title 16.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
Deleted: 16.218
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.206
163
65283.00109\44191273.1
§ 16.63.090 TIME LIMIT FOR IMPLEMENTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. (A) The grantee of a Conditional Use Permit shall have one year from the effective date of the permit to establish a right to use the permit; otherwise, the Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void. For the purposes of this section, such a right shall be established if either:
(1) A building permit has been issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the site for which the Conditional Use Permit was approved; or (2) In the event no building permit is required, a certificate of occupancy has been issued for the structure for which the Conditional Use Permit was approved; or (3) In the event no building permit or certificate of occupancy is required, the site for which the Conditional Use Permit was approved is occupied and used for the permitted purpose; or (4) Prior to the date on which the Conditional Use Permit will elapse, the grantee files an application to renew the permit pursuant to subsection (B) below. (B) A Conditional Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for two continuous one-year periods, provided that the application for renewal is filed with the Planning Department prior to the expiration date, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.65 (Minor Modifications) of this Title 16.

Additional renewals shall require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. (C) The Planning Commission may grant or deny an application for renewal of a Conditional Use Permit. As part of its action, the Commission may also modify existing conditions of approval or add new conditions to reflect any change in circumstances related to the Conditional Use Permit and surrounding properties.
(D) If any Conditional Use Permit fails to be actively exercised for a continuous 180-day period, the permit shall lapse and become void.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.63.100 MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.
(A) The Director is authorized to grant permits for minor changes related to use permits, planned development permits, variances, and similar actions granted by the City Council, the Planning Commission or the Director. The basic policies to be followed in granting minor changes shall be as follows:
(1) Meaning or Intent. The meaning or intent of an express condition or the purpose or intent of an action by the decision-making authority shall not be altered. (2) Site or Structural Alterations. Site or structural alterations or additions may be permitted as may be deemed appropriate by the Director as long as no permit conditions or other requirements of this zoning ordinance or applicable actions by the decision-making authority on a project are violated, abridged, waived, or nullified in any meaningful manner. Such alterations may include, but are not limited to, structural additions in square footage, lot coverage or any dimension of a structure. (B) Approval of a director’s permit for a minor change may be granted only if the director determines that:
(1) The proposed minor change does not cause the project to be inconsistent with the findings for approval from the original approval.
(2) The proposed minor change does not make a significant alteration to the project. (3) The proposed project conforms to the general plan, any applicable specific plan or development code, and the purposes and requirements of this zoning ordinance. (4) The basic policies for minor changes described in subsection A of this section are met.

Deleted: a single
Deleted: Planning Department
Deleted: 16.222
164
65283.00109\44191273.1
CHAPTER 16.64: VARIANCES
Section

16.64.010 Purpose and intent

16.64.020 Initiation

16.64.030 Proceedings

16.64.040 Required findings

16.64.050 Variance attached to the property

16.64.060 Revocation

16.64.070 Time limit for implementing variance
§ 16.64.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.
(A) The Variance procedure is provided pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code 65906 to grant relief from Development Code provisions when, because of special circumstances applicable to a property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, the strict application of this Development Code deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zoning classification. In such case, a Variance may be granted to allow the following:
(1) A reduction or variance in setback regulations; parking; and/or loading requirements; front, side, or rear yard regulations; height regulations; or commercial screening wall requirements;
(2) A change in the required location of accessory buildings and uses; (3) A reduction or variation in area regulations including limitations in the area covered by accessory buildings; or
(4) A modification or elimination of the utility service undergrounding requirements. (B) Variances shall not be granted to authorize a use or activity on a property that is not otherwise expressly authorized by the provisions of this Development Code governing that property. A Variance is not a substitute for a zone change, Development Code text amendment, or Conditional Use Permit.
(C) Financial hardship in and of itself does not represent grounds on which to file a Variance application to gain relief from Development Code provisions. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.64.020 INITIATION.
(A) An application for a Variance may be initiated by any person who is able to demonstrate a legal vested interest in the proposed application. The authorized agent of any person with a legal vested interest may also initiate an application. The Director may request proof of ownership or authorization to apply prior to the acceptance of any application. (B) An application shall be filed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.55 (Applications, Processing, Filing, and Fees) of this Title 16.
(C) In addition to the application filing requirements established in Chapter 16.55, the applicant shall file a statement of the precise nature of the Variance requested and the practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship that would result from the strict or literal interpretation of this ordinance, together with any other data pertinent to the application and the making of requisite findings. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
Deleted: 16.220
Deleted: 16.220
Deleted: 16.220
Deleted: 16.220
Deleted: 16.220
Deleted: 16.220
Deleted: 16.220
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: 16.202
165
65283.00109\44191273.1
§ 16.64.030 PROCEEDINGS.
(A) Community and Economic Development Director investigation. The Director shall investigate the application and proposal, including the analysis of precedent cases as appropriate, and shall prepare a report outlining facts and a recommendation relating to the application. The report shall be provided to the Planning Commission prior to any scheduled public hearing on the application. (B) Planning Commission proceedings.
(1) A public hearing before the Planning Commission shall be noticed and conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings) of this Title 16. (2) At the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall review the application and proposal and receive evidence concerning the proposed Variance and the conditions that make compliance with specific provisions of this Development Code difficult. (3) The Planning Commission shall act to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application.
(4) The decision of the Planning Commission shall become effective immediately upon its rendering, unless an appeal is filed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.57 (Appeals and Revocations) of this Title 16.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.64.040 REQUIRED FINDINGS.

In granting a Variance, the Planning Commission must make all of the following findings:
(1) That the strict or literal interpretation and application of this Title 16 would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of this Title 16, or would deprive applicants of privileges granted to others in similar circumstances; and (2) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended development of the property that do not apply generally to other property in the same zone; and
(3) That the granting of such Variance will not constitute the granting of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity classified in the same zone; and
(4) That the granting of such Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare nor injurious to property or improvements in the zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and
(5) That the granting of such Variance will not create any inconsistency with any objective contained in the General Plan.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.64.050 VARIANCE ATTACHED TO THE PROPERTY.

A Variance that is valid and in effect and granted pursuant to the provisions of this Title 16 shall be valid only on the property for which it was granted and only for the improvements for which it is granted and further, shall continue to be valid upon change of ownership of the property or any lawfully existing building or structure on the property.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.64.060 REVOCATION.

The Director shall have the authority to initiate proceedings to suspend or revoke a Variance pursuant to provisions set forth in Division 1, Chapter 16.57 (Appeals and Revocations) of this Title 16.

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.206
166
65283.00109\44191273.1
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.64.070 TIME LIMIT FOR IMPLEMENTING A VARIANCE.
(A) The grantee of a Variance shall have one year from the effective date of the approval to establish a right to use the approval; otherwise, the Variance shall lapse and become void. For the purposes of this section, such a right shall be established if either:
(1) A building permit has been issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the site for which the Variance was approved; or (2) In the event no building permit is required, a certificate of occupancy has been issued for the structure for which the Variance was approved; or (3) In the event no building permit or certificate of occupancy is required, the site for which the Variance was approved is occupied in accordance with the Variance; or (4) Prior to the date on which the Variance will elapse, the grantee files an application to renew the permit pursuant to subsection (B) below. (B) A Variance subject to lapse may be renewed for a single one-year period, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.65 (Minor Modifications) of this Title 16,and provided that the application for renewal is filed with the Planning Department prior to the expiration date. Additional renewals shall require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. (C) The Planning Commission may approve or deny an application for renewal of a Variance.

As part of its action, the Commission may also modify existing conditions of approval or add new conditions to reflect any change in circumstances related to the Variance and surrounding properties. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.65: MINOR MODIFICATIONS
Section

16.65.010 Purpose and intent

16.65.020 Initiation

16.65.030 Proceedings

16.65.040 Findings

16.65.050 Approval attached to the property

16.65.060 Revocation

16.65.070 Time limit for using Minor Modification approval § 16.65.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.
(A) Intent. The Minor Modification procedure is established to grant minor relief from development standards, under limited circumstances, when the granting of such relief will provide for better design and function of the structure, or addition to a structure, proposed. (B) Applicability.
(1) For the purposes of this Chapter 16.65, a Minor Modification application shall be filed whenever any one of the following deviations from the provisions of this Title 16 is proposed to allow:
(a) A modification of distance or area regulations not exceeding:
i. Twenty percent of the required front, side, rear, or courtyard distances or other open space requirements;
Deleted: 16.222
Deleted: 16.222
Deleted: 16.222
Deleted: 16.222
Deleted: 16.222
Deleted: 16.222
Deleted: 16.222
Deleted: 16.222
Deleted: 16.222
167
65283.00109\44191273.1
ii. Twenty percent of the height limitations for antennas; or iii. Ten percent of the lot coverage requirement.
(b) A modification of automobile parking space configurations (e.g. tandem parking, 3-car garages), or requirements whereby a reduction of not more than 10% of the required spaces is proposed.
(c) In compliance with §16.23.040, when it can be demonstrated that the parking demand will be reduced by one or more methods, including, but not limited to carpools/vanpools, varied work shifts, company owned buses, etc., parking may be reduced by not more than 50%. (d) A modification of private usable open space requirements. (e) Additions to structures that are nonconforming as to side yard, rear yard, or lot coverage, provided that the additions meet the requirements of this Title 16. (f) Walls, hedges, or fences to exceed the height limits established in Chapter 16.22 (Fences, Walls, and Hedges) of this Title 16 and to permit them to be located within setback areas where consistent with safety and neighborhood appearance. (g) To allow two continuous one-year extensions of a current permit or variance where the use is not in conflict with the adopted general plan, has not been prohibited by the Planning Commission, and is not of a controversial nature. (2) Modifications in excess of those cited in subparagraph (1) above shall require a Variance pursuant to Chapter 16.64 (Variances) of this Title 16. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06) § 16.65.020 INITIATION.
(A) An application for a Minor Modification may be initiated by any person who is able to demonstrate a legal vested interest in the proposed application. The authorized agent of any person with a legal vested interest may also initiate an application. The Director may request proof of ownership or authorization to apply prior to the acceptance of any application. (B) In addition to the application filing requirements established in Chapter 16.55 (Applications, Processing, Filing, and Fees), the applicant shall file a statement of the precise nature of the Minor Modification requested and reasons for the request. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.65.030 PROCEEDINGS.
(A) Community and Economic Development Director investigation. The Director or his designee shall investigate the application and proposal, including the analysis of precedent cases as appropriate.
(B) Notice of receipt of application and comment period. Upon five days of deeming the application complete pursuant to the provisions of 16.55.030 of this Title 16, the Director shall mail or deliver notice of the application to all persons, including businesses, corporation, or other people or private entities owning real property within a radius of 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property which is the subject of the application. Said notice shall describe the proposed application and invite persons to comment in writing on the application. The notice shall provide for a 10-day comment period, commencing upon the delivery or mailing of said notice. (C) Community and Economic Development Director action. (1) Following the 10-day public comment period, and upon considering all communications received, the Director may:
(a) Render a decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Minor Modification application;
Deleted: ,
Deleted: 46
Deleted: 44
Deleted: a single
Deleted: extension of time not to exceed one year
Deleted: 16.220
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
168
65283.00109\44191273.1
(b) Continue the matter for a specified time to allow for further investigation; or
(c) Decline to make a decision on the basis that the matter requires consideration by the Planning Commission.
(2) The Director shall notify the applicant and appropriate public officials of the decision.
(3) Any applicant, interested person, or public official may appeal any decision of the Director regarding a Minor Modification to the Planning Commission in accord with the procedures set forth in Chapter 16.57 (Appeals and Revocations) of this Title 16. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.65.040 FINDINGS.

A Minor Modification application shall not be granted unless all of the following findings can be made:
(A) Modification is needed to allow property to be used in a more beneficial manner; and (B) Modification would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare or to surrounding property owners or the community; and
(C) The granting of the application is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and would not impair the character of the neighborhood in which it is located. (D) The Minor Modification is consistent with the objectives, goals, and policies of the Santa Paula General Plan and intent of the zoning regulations. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06) § 16.65.050 APPROVAL ATTACHED TO THE PROPERTY.

A Minor Modification that is valid and in effect and granted pursuant to the provisions of this Title 16 shall be valid only on the property for which it was granted and only for the improvements for which it is granted and further, shall continue to be valid upon change of ownership of the property or any lawfully existing building or structure on the property.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.65.060 REVOCATION.

The Director shall have the authority to initiate proceedings to suspend or revoke a Minor Modification pursuant to provisions set forth in Chapter 16.57 (Appeals and Revocations) of this Title 16. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.65.070 TIME LIMIT FOR USING MINOR MODIFICATION APPROVAL. (A) The grantee of a Minor Modification shall have one year from the effective date of the approval to establish a right to use the approval; otherwise, the approval shall lapse and shall become void. For the purposes of this section, such a right shall be established if either:
(1) A building permit has been issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the site for which the Minor Modification was approved; or (2) In the event no building permit is required, a certificate of occupancy has been issued for the structure for which the Minor Modification was approved; or (3) In the event no building permit or occupancy is required, the site for which the Minor Modification was approved is occupied; or
(4) Prior to the date on which the Minor Modification will elapse, the grantee files an application to renew the permit pursuant to subsection (B) below.

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.206
169
65283.00109\44191273.1
(B) A Minor Modification approval subject to lapse may be renewed for a single one-year period, provided that the application for renewal is filed with the Planning Department prior to the expiration date. Minor Modifications granted for time extensions (16.65.010 (B)(1)(f)) shall not be eligible for Minor Modification renewal.
(C) The Director may approve or deny an application for renewal of a Minor Modification. As part of the action, the Director may also modify existing conditions of approval or add new conditions to reflect any change in circumstances related to the Minor Modification and surrounding properties. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.66: ZONING CLEARANCE
Section

16.66.010 Purpose and intent

16.66.020 Applicability

16.66.030 Proceedings

16.66.040 Record of decision
§ 16.66.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.

The Zoning Clearance procedure is established as a mechanism to verify that a proposed land use complies with the use regulations applicable to the zoning district in which the subject property is located. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.66.020 APPLICABILITY.

Prior to the issuance of a business license or a building, grading, or other construction permit for a proposed use for which no discretionary land use permit is required by this Title 16, the applicant must obtain a Zoning Clearance from the Planning Department and any other city department with jurisdiction over the subject use.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.66.030 PROCEEDINGS.
(A) The Director or designee shall determine whether the proposed use complies with the land use regulations of this Title 16. Written findings and recommendations shall be provided to city staff responsible for permit issuance. Where the Director or designee determines that the proposed use fails to comply with the regulations of this Title 16, no permit shall be issued. (B) Other city departments with jurisdiction over the subject use shall review the subject application for compliance with applicable regulations. Written findings and recommendations shall be provided to city staff responsible for permit issuance. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.66.040 RECORD OF DECISION.

Where no other authorization is required, a request for Zoning Clearance shall be filed on the forms provided by the Planning Department.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.67: DESIGN REVIEW
Section
Deleted: 16.222
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.224
Deleted: 16.224
Deleted: 16.224
Deleted: 16.224
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
170
65283.00109\44191273.1

16.67.010 Purpose and intent

16.67.020 Applicability

16.67.030 Design Review Committee

16.67.040 Plans and drawings to be submitted

16.67.050 Proceedings

16.67.060 Effective date of decision

16.67.070 Time limit for implementing design review approval § 16.67.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.

The design review process is established to:
(A) Promote orderly, attractive, and harmonious development throughout Santa Paula; (B) Recognize neighborhood character and environmental limitations in development; (C) Ensure that the design and exterior architectural treatment of proposed structures complement the design or exterior architectural treatment of existing structures in the immediate neighborhood and do not conflict with existing development in any manner that would cause a substantial depreciation of property values in the neighborhood; and (D) Promote the general welfare by preventing establishment of uses or erection of structures having qualities which would not meet the specific intent clauses or performance standards of this Title 16, or which are not properly related to their sites, surroundings, traffic circulation, or environmental setting.
(E) Assure conformance with the provisions of this Title 16 and in particular, for conformance with the design, land use regulations and development standards set forth in Chapters 16.04 through

16.38 and the Design Review Guidelines set forth in City Council Resolution 5298. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1305, passed 10-7-20) § 16.67.020 APPLICABILITY.
(A) The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development requiring a building permit, including:
(1) Any commercial or industrial development.
(2) Multi-family residential projects.
(3) Second units (a.k.a. granny flats)
(4) Single-family homes that are reviewed concurrently with a tentative subdivision map.
(5) Single-family homes including manufactured homes being moved onto an existing lot.
(6) Carports.
(7) Signs, pursuant to Chapter 16.24.
(8) Fences or walls on commercially or industrially zoned property. (9) Development of any structures intended for educational (as allowed by state law), institutional, or similar purposes.
(10) Habitable accessory structures.
(B) Exceptions to the application of this Chapter 16.67 include:

Deleted: 16.226
Deleted: 16.226
Deleted: 16.226
Deleted: 16.226
Deleted: 16.226
Deleted: 16.226
Deleted: 16.226
Deleted: 7
Deleted: 76
Deleted: 48
Deleted: 16.226
171
65283.00109\44191273.1
(1) Single-family homes on existing residentially zoned legal lots. (2) Additions to single-family homes on residentially zoned legal lots. (3) Non-habitable accessory structures other than carports on single-family residential lots.
(4) Interior modifications to a building or structure that do not result in a change to the exterior appearance of the building or structure.
(C) For any development proposal requiring a discretionary permit, design review shall be conducted in conjunction with the discretionary permit application. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1159, passed 6-19-06; Am. Ord. 1172, passed 7-2-07 ; Am. Ord. 1305, passed 10-720)
§ 16.67.030 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE.
(A) A Design Review Committee, comprised of the Director or designee, City Engineer or designee, and representatives from the City Building and Safety, Fire and Police Departments, is hereby established for the purpose of conducting design review. (B) The Design Review Committee shall be responsible for reviewing relevant applications for conformance with the provisions of this Title 16 and in particular, for conformance with the design, land use regulations and development standards set forth in Chapters 16.04 through 16.38 and the Design Review Guidelines set forth in City Council Resolution 5298. (C) In performing design review, the Committee shall be guided by the statement of purpose set forth in 16.67.010 (Purpose and Intent) above. Further, the Committee shall work to bar the unsightly, the inharmonious, the monotonous, and the hazardous to ensure that proposed improvements will not impair the desirability of investment or occupancy nearby. However, originality in site planning, architecture, landscaping, and graphic design shall not be suppressed. (D) Review by the Committee shall include exterior design, materials, textures, colors, means of illumination, landscaping, grading, signs, ingress/egress, parking, and other improvements to ensure that adverse aesthetic and environmental impacts on and surrounding the site are minimized. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1305, passed 10-7-20) § 16.67.040 PLANS AND DRAWINGS TO BE SUBMITTED.

In addition to meeting of the other application requirements of this Development Code, projects subject to design review shall be required to have the following materials submitted to the Planning Department:
(A) A site plan, drawn to scale, showing the proposed location of structures and other improvements, including, where appropriate, driveways, pedestrian walkways, off-street parking areas, landscaped areas, fences, and walls. The site plan shall indicate the locations of off-street parking areas, including entrances and exits, and the direction of traffic flow into and out of off-street parking areas. (B) A landscaped plan, drawn to scale, showing the locations of existing trees proposed to be removed and proposed to be retained on the site; the location and design of landscaped areas and the varieties and sizes of plant materials to be planted therein; and other landscape features, including irrigation system.
(C) Architectural drawings or sketches, drawn to scale, including floor plans in sufficient detail to permit computation of yard requirements and showing all elevations of the proposed structures as they will appear upon completion. All exterior surface materials and colors shall be specified. (D) Accurate scale drawings of all signs indicating sign size, material, color, and illumination, if any.
(E) Grading and drainage plans may be required by the City Engineer.

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 07
Deleted: 76
Deleted: 16.226
172
65283.00109\44191273.1
(F) Such other data required on the Planning Department Instructions for Submitting Applications for the Design Review Committee to ensure that the purposes of this section are satisfied. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04 ; Am. Ord. 1305, passed 10-7-20) § 16.67.050 PROCEEDINGS.
(A) Application completeness. Within 30 days of the date the application is submitted, the Director shall make a determination on application completeness. (B) Twenty-one-day public comment period. Upon determination of application completeness, notice of project proposal is:
(1) Mailed or delivered to all persons including businesses, corporations, or other public or private entities owning real property within a radius of 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property which is the subject of the proposed land use application as such owners and their addresses are shown on the current assessment roll of the Ventura County Assessor; (2) Published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the city; and
(3) Posted in conspicuous places on the property affected, in accordance with City Council Resolution 3404.
(C) Design Review Committee. Within 30 days of application completeness, the Design Review Committee shall act to review public comments, and approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the plans and drawings, or shall request the applicant to make revisions. Failure of the Committee to act within 30 days shall be deemed approval of the application, unless the applicant consents in writing to an extension of time.
(D) Decision. The Director or designee shall render the decision and notify the applicant of the decision in writing.
(E) Appeal period. Within ten calendar days of the date of the rendering of the decision, the decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04; Am. Ord. 1305, passed 10-7-20) § 16.67.060 EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION.

The effective date of the Committee’s decision shall be the date indicated on the city document delivered to the applicant informing the applicant of the Committee’s decision. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04 ; Am. Ord. 1305, passed 10-7-20) § 16.67.070 TIME LIMIT FOR IMPLEMENTING DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL. (A) A Design Review approval shall be implemented within one year from the effective date of the approval to establish a right to use the approval. The approval shall lapse and become void after that one year unless either:
(1) A building permit has been issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the site for which Design Review approval was granted; or (2) Prior to the date on which Design Review approval will lapse, the permittee files a written request to renew the Design Review permit pursuant to subsection (B) below; or (3) Associated Planning permits that have a longer expiration period are obtained at the same time as Design Review approval, in which case the later expiration date shall be observed. (B) A Design Review approval subject to lapse may be renewed for a maximum one-year period, provided that a written request for renewal is filed with the Planning Department prior to the expiration date, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.65 (Minor Modifications).

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.222
173
65283.00109\44191273.1
(C) The Director may approve or deny an application for renewal of a Design Review approval. As part of the action, the Director may also modify existing conditions of approval or add new conditions to reflect any change in circumstances related to the project and surrounding properties. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04 ; Am. Ord. 1305, passed 10-7-20) CHAPTER 16.68: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Section

16.68.010 Accessory dwelling units
§ 16.68.010 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.
(A) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to allow and regulate accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) in compliance with Cal. Gov’t Code §65852.2 and 65852.22.
(B) Effect of conforming. An ADU or JADU that conforms to the standards in this section will not be:
(1) Deemed to be inconsistent with the city’s general plan and zoning designation for the lot on which the ADU or JADU is located.
(2) Deemed to exceed the allowable density for the lot on which the ADU or JADU is located.
(3) Considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth.
(4) Required to correct a nonconforming zoning condition, as defined in subsection (C)(7) below. This does not prevent the city from enforcing compliance with applicable building standards in accordance with Cal. Health and Safety Code 17980.12. (C) Definitions. As used in this section, terms are defined as follows:
(1) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT or ADU means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following:
(a) An efficiency unit, as defined by Cal. Health and Safety Code 17958.1; and
(b) A manufactured home, as defined by Cal. Health and Safety Code 18007.
(2) ACCESSORY STRUCTURE means a structure that is accessory and incidental to a dwelling located on the same lot.
(3) COMPLETE INDEPENDENT LIVING FACILITIES means permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family or multifamily dwelling is or will be situated.
(4) EFFICIENCY KITCHEN means a kitchen that includes all of the following:
(a) A cooking facility with appliances.
(b) A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of a reasonable size in relation to the size of the JADU.
(5) JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT or JADU means a residential unit that satisfies all of the following:

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.227
174
65283.00109\44191273.1
(a) It is no more than 500 square feet in size.
(b) It is contained entirely within an existing or proposed single-family structure. An enclosed use within the residence, such as an attached garage, is considered to be a part of and contained within the single-family structure.
(c) It includes its own separate sanitation facilities or shares sanitation facilities with the existing or proposed single-family structure. (d) If the unit does not include its own separate bathroom, then it contains an interior entrance to the main living area of the existing or proposed single-family structure in addition to an exterior entrance that is separate from the main entrance to the primary dwelling. (e) It includes an efficiency kitchen, as defined in subsection (C)(4) above. (6) LIVING AREA means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit, including basements and attics, but does not include a garage or any accessory structure. (7) NONCONFORMING ZONING CONDITION means a physical improvement on a property that does not conform with current zoning standards. (8) PASSAGEWAY means a pathway that is unobstructed clear to the sky and extends from a street to one entrance of the ADU or JADU. (9) PROPOSED DWELLING means a dwelling that is the subject of a permit application and that meets the requirements for permitting. (10) PUBLIC TRANSIT means a location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public. (11) TANDEM PARKING means that two or more automobiles are parked on a driveway or in any other location on a lot, lined up behind one another. (D) Approvals. The following approvals apply to ADUs and JADUs under this section:
(1) Building permit only. If an ADU or JADU complies with each of the general requirements in subsection (E) below, it is allowed with only a building permit in the following scenarios:
(a) Converted on single-family lot: One ADU as described in this subsection (D)(1)(a) and one JADU on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling on it, where the ADU or JADU:
i. Is either: within the space of a proposed single-family dwelling; within the existing space of an existing single-family dwelling; or (in the case of an ADU only) within the existing space of an accessory structure, plus up to 150 additional square feet if the expansion is limited to accommodating ingress and egress; and
ii. Has exterior access that is independent of that for the singlefamily dwelling; and iii. Has side and rear setbacks sufficient for fire and safety, as dictated by applicable building and fire codes.
iv. The JADU complies with the requirements of Cal. Gov’t Code 65852.22.
(b) Limited detached on single-family lot: One detached, new-construction ADU on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling (in addition to any JADU that might otherwise be established on the lot under subsection (D)(1)(a) above), if the detached ADU satisfies each of the following limitations:
i. The side- and rear-yard setbacks are at least four feet. ii. The total floor area is 800 square feet or smaller. 175
65283.00109\44191273.1
iii. The peak height above grade does not exceed the applicable height limit in subsection (E)(2) below.
(c) Converted on multifamily lot: One or more ADUs within portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures that are not used as livable space, including but not limited to storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each converted ADU complies with state building standards for dwellings. Under this subsection (D)(1)(c), at least one converted ADU is allowed within an existing multifamily dwelling, up to a quantity equal to 25% of the existing multifamily dwelling units.
(d) Limited detached on multifamily lot: No more than two detached ADUs on a lot that has an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling if each detached ADU satisfies both of the following limitations:
i. The side- and rear-yard setbacks are at least four feet. If the existing multifamily dwelling has a rear or side yard setback of less than four feet, the city will not require any modification to the multifamily dwelling as a condition of approving the ADU. ii. The peak height above grade does not exceed the applicable height limit provided in subsection (E)(2) below.
(2) ADU permit.
(a) Except as allowed under subsection (D)(1) above, no ADU may be created without both a building permit and an ADU permit in compliance with the standards set forth in subsections (E) and (F) below.
(b) The city may charge a fee to reimburse it for costs incurred in processing ADU permits, including the costs of adopting or amending the city’s ADU ordinance. The ADU permit processing fee is determined by the Director and approved by the City Council by resolution. (3) Process and timing.
(a) An ADU permit is considered and approved ministerially, without discretionary review or a hearing.
(b) The city must approve or deny an application to create an ADU or JADU within 60 days from the date that the city receives a completed application. If the city has not approved or denied the completed application within 60 days, the application is deemed approved unless either:
i. The applicant requests a delay, in which case the 60-day time period is tolled for the period of the requested delay, or ii. When an application to create an ADU or JADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family or multifamily dwelling on the lot, the city may delay acting on the permit application for the ADU or JADU until the city acts on the permit application to create the new single-family or multifamily dwelling, but the application to create the ADU or JADU will still be considered ministerially without discretionary review or a hearing. (c) If the city denies an application to create an ADU or JADU, the city must provide the applicant with comments that include, among other things, a list of all the defective or deficient items and a description of how the application may be remedied by the applicant. Notice of the denial and corresponding comments must be provided to the applicant within the 60-day time period established by subsection (D)(3)(b) above.
(d) A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU shall be reviewed with the application for the ADU and issued at the same time. (E) General ADU and JADU requirements. The following requirements apply to all ADUs and JADUs that are approved under subsections (D)(1) or (D)(2) above:
(1) Zoning.

Deleted: Planning
176
65283.00109\44191273.1
(a) An ADU or JADU subject only to a building permit under subsection (D)(1) above may be created on a lot in a residential, commercial or mixed-use zone. (b) An ADU or JADU subject to an ADU permit under subsection (D)(2) above may be created on a lot that is zoned to allow single-family dwelling residential use or multifamily dwelling residential use.
(2) Height.
(a) Except as otherwise provided by subsections (E)(2)(b) and (E)(2)(c) below, a detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit may not exceed 16 feet in height. Alternatively, an ADU in compliance with the underlying zone setbacks is permitted to use the underlying zone height regulations. (b) A detached ADU that does not meet the setbacks of the underlying zone may be up to 18 feet in height if it is created on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit that is located within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in 21155 of the Cal. Public Resources Code. The ADU may be up to two additional feet in height (for a maximum of 20 feet) if necessary to accommodate a roof pitch that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. Alternatively, an ADU that meets the requirements of this subsection (E)(2)(b) that complies with the underlying zone setbacks is permitted to use the underlying zone height regulations.
(c) A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed 18 feet in height unless it meets the setback requirements of the underlying zone, except as provided in subsection (E)(2)(b) above. (d) An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling and does not meet the setbacks of the underlying zone may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ADUs subject to this subsection (E)(2)(d) may not exceed two stories. (e) For purposes of this subsection (E)(2), height is measured above existing legal grade to the peak of the structure.
(3) Fire sprinklers.
(a) Fire sprinklers are required in an ADU if sprinklers are required in the primary residence.
(b) The construction of an ADU does not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary
dwelling.
(4) Rental term. No ADU or JADU may be rented for a term that is shorter than 30 days. This prohibition applies regardless of when the ADU or JADU was created. (5) No separate conveyance. An ADU or JADU may be rented, but, except as otherwise provided in Cal. Gov’t Code 65852.26, no ADU or JADU may be sold or otherwise conveyed separately from the lot and the primary dwelling (in the case of a single-family lot) or from the lot and all of the dwellings (in the case of a multifamily lot).
(6) Septic system. If the ADU or JADU will connect to an onsite wastewatertreatment system, the owner must include with the application a percolation test completed within the last five years or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years. (7) Owner occupancy.
(a) As required by state law, all JADUs are subject to an owner-occupancy requirement. A natural person with legal or equitable title to the property must reside on the property, in either the primary dwelling or JADU, as the person’s legal domicile and permanent residence. However, the owner-occupancy requirement in this subsection does not apply if the property is entirely owned by another governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization. 177
65283.00109\44191273.1
(8) Building & safety.
(a) Must comply with building code. Subject to subsection (E)(8)(b) below, all ADUs and JADUs must comply with all local building code requirements. (b) No change of occupancy. Construction of an ADU does not constitute a Group R occupancy change under the local building code, as described in Section 310 of the California Building Code, unless the building official or building and safety officer makes a written finding based on substantial evidence in the record that the construction of the ADU could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. Nothing in this subsection (E)(8)(b) prevents the city from changing the occupancy code of a space that was uninhabitable space or that was only permitted for nonresidential use and was subsequently converted for residential use in accordance with this section. (F) Specific ADU requirements. The following requirements apply only to ADUs that require an ADU permit under subsection (D)(2) above.
(1) Maximum size.
(a) The maximum size of a detached or attached ADU subject to this subsection (F) is 850 square feet for a studio or one-bedroom unit and 1,200 square feet for a unit with two or more bedrooms.
(b) An attached ADU that is created on a lot with an existing primary dwelling is further limited to 50% of the floor area of the existing primary dwelling. (c) Application of other development standards in this subsection (F), such as FAR or lot coverage, might further limit the size of the ADU, but no application of the percent-based size limit in subsection (F)(1)(b) above or of an FAR, front setback, lot coverage limit, or open-space requirement may require the ADU to be less than 800 square feet. (2) Setbacks.
(a) An ADU that is subject to this subsection (F) must conform to a 20- foot front-yard setback, subject to subsection
(F)(1)(c) above.
(b) An ADU that is subject to this subsection (F) must conform to 4-foot sideand rear-yard setbacks. (c) No setback is required for an ADU that is subject to this subsection (F) if the ADU is constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. (3) Lot coverage. No ADU subject to this subsection (F) may cause the total lot coverage of the lot to exceed the underlying zone, subject to subsection (F)(1)(c) above. (4) Minimum open space. No ADU subject to this subsection (F) may cause the total percentage of open space of the lot to fall below the underlying zone, subject to subsection (F)(1)(c) above.
(5) Passageway. No passageway, as defined by subsection (C)(8) above, is required for an ADU.
(6) Parking.
(a) No off-street parking spaces are required for any new or converted ADU. (b) No replacement. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or converted to an ADU, those off-street parking spaces are not required to be replaced.
(7) Architectural requirements.
(a) The materials and colors of the exterior walls, roof, and windows and doors must match the appearance and architectural design of those of the primary dwelling. 178
65283.00109\44191273.1
(b) The roof slope must match that of the dominant roof slope of the primary dwelling. The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by the largest portion of the roof. (c) The exterior lighting must be limited to down-lights or as otherwise required by the building or fire code.
(d) The ADU must have an independent exterior entrance, apart from that of the primary dwelling.
(e) Windows and doors of the ADU may not have a direct line of sight to an adjoining residential property. Fencing, landscaping, or privacy glass may be used to provide screening and prevent a direct line of sight.
(f) All windows and doors in an ADU that are less than 30 feet from a property line that is not a public right-of-way line must either be (for windows) clerestory with the bottom of the glass at least six feet above the finished floor, or (for windows and for doors) utilize frosted or obscure glass.
(8) Landscape requirements. Evergreen landscape screening must be planted and maintained between the ADU and adjacent parcels as follows:
(a) At least one 15-gallon size plant shall be provided for every five linear feet of exterior wall. Alternatively, at least one 24” box size plant shall be provided for every ten linear feet of exterior wall.
(b) Plant specimens must be at least six feet tall when installed. As an alternative, a solid fence of at least six feet in height may be installed. (c) All landscaping must be drought-tolerant.
(9) Historical protections. An ADU that is on or within 600 feet of real property that is listed in the California Register of Historic Resources must be located so as to not be visible from any public right-of-way.
(G) Fees. The following requirements apply to all ADUs that are approved under subsections (D)(1) or (D)(2) above.
(1) Impact fees.
(a) No impact fee is required for an ADU that is less than 750 square feet in size. For purposes of this subsection (G) (1), “impact fee” means a “fee” under the Mitigation Fee Act (Cal. Gov’t Code 66000(b)) and a fee under the Quimby Act (Cal. Gov’t Code 66477). “Impact fee” here does not include any connection fee or capacity charge for water or sewer service. (b) Any impact fee that is required for an ADU that is 750 square feet or larger in size must be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. (e.g., the floor area of the ADU, divided by the floor area of the primary dwelling, times the typical fee amount charged for a new dwelling).
(2) Utility fees.
(a) If an ADU is constructed with a new single-family home, a separate utility connection directly between the ADU and the utility and payment of the normal connection fee and capacity charge for a new dwelling are required.
(b) Except as described in subsection (G)(2)(a), converted ADUs on a single-family lot that are created under subsection (D)(1)(a) above are not required to have a new or separate utility connection directly between the ADU and the utility, nor is a connection fee or capacity charge required.
(c) Except as described in subsection (G)(2)(A), all ADUs that are not covered by subsection (G)(2)(B) require a new, separate utility connection directly between the ADU and the utility.
179
65283.00109\44191273.1
i. The connection is subject to a connection fee or capacity charge that is proportionate to the burden created by the ADU based on either the floor area or the number of drainage-fixture units (DFU) values, as defined by the Uniform Plumbing Code, upon the water or sewer system.
ii. The portion of the fee or charge that is charged by the city may not exceed the reasonable cost of providing this service. (H) Nonconforming Zoning Code conditions, Building Code violations, and unpermitted structures.
(1) Generally. The city will not deny an ADU or JADU application due to a nonconforming zoning condition, building code violation, or unpermitted structure on the lot that does not present a threat to the public health and safety and that is not affected by the construction of the ADU or JADU.
(2) Unpermitted ADUs constructed before 2018.
(a) Permit to legalize. As required by state law, the city may not deny a permit to legalize an existing but unpermitted ADU that was constructed before January 1, 2018, if denial is based on either of the following grounds:
i. The ADU violates applicable building standards, or
ii. The ADU does not comply with the state ADU law (Cal. Gov’t Code 65852.2) or this ADU ordinance.
(b) Exceptions:
i. Notwithstanding subsection (H)(2)(a) above, the city may deny a permit to legalize an existing but unpermitted ADU that was constructed before January 1, 2018, if the city makes a finding that correcting a violation is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or of occupants of the structure.
ii. Subsection (H)(2)(A) above does not apply to a building that is deemed to be substandard in accordance with Cal. Health and Safety Code 17920.3. (I) Nonconforming ADUs and discretionary approval. Any proposed ADU or JADU that does not conform to the objective standards set forth in subsections (A) through (H) of this section may be allowed by the city with a conditional use permit, in accordance with all other applicable provisions of this title.
(Ord. 1323, passed 12-21-22)
CHAPTER 16.69: TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
Section

16.69.010 Purpose and intent

16.69.020 Initiation

16.69.030 Proceedings

16.69.040 Conditions of approval

16.69.050 Bonds may be required

16.69.060 Specific conditions for Specific Uses

16.69.070 Signage for temporary events
§ 16.69.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.

Deleted: 16.228
Deleted: 16.228
Deleted: 16.228
Deleted: 16.228
Deleted: 16.228
Deleted: 16.228
Deleted: 16.228
180
65283.00109\44191273.1
(A) The Temporary Use Permit is established to allow certain uses to operate for limited, defined periods at locations on private property throughout the city, provided the uses are regulated so as to avoid adverse impacts on the neighborhoods in which they occur. (B) Temporary Use Permit applications may only be considered for properties located within zoning districts where such temporary uses are permitted. The land use regulations contained in Chapters 16.04 through 16.16 (Zones, Land Use Regulations, and Development Standards) of this Title 16 indicate where such conditions apply.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.69.020 INITIATION.

An application for a Temporary Use Permit may be initiated by any person who is able to demonstrate a legal vested interest in the proposed application. The authorized agent of any person with a legal vested interest may also initiate an application. The Director may request proof of ownership or authorization to apply prior to the acceptance of any application. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.69.030 PROCEEDINGS.
(A) An application for a Temporary Use Permit shall be submitted no less than 14 days prior to the proposed first day of the event.
(B) Upon acceptance of a Temporary Use Permit application as complete, the Director or the designee shall review the application for conformance with the provisions of this Title 16. No public hearing shall be required, unless determined appropriate by the Director, in accordance with section (D) below. Based on this review, the Director shall act to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application.
(C) Within ten days of receiving a completed application, the Director or designee shall issue a statement of decisions and findings. The statement shall recite, among other things, the facts and reasons for granting or denying the application.
(D) The Director shall have the option to refer the application to the Planning Commission for disposition of the request.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.69.040 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
(A) In granting a Temporary Use Permit, the Director may impose conditions on a use to include, but not be limited to:
(1) Number of days the event can occur;
(2) Hours of operation;
(3) Location or placement of temporary walls or fences; (4) Type, size and number of signs;
(5) Lighting;
(6) Noise, including live entertainment, music or use of amplifying equipment; (7) Traffic circulation, ingress, and egress; or
(8) Other conditions deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare.
(B) Specific uses and activities listed in 16.69.060 below shall be subject to the conditions specified for that use or activity.

Deleted: 07
Deleted: 33
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.228
181
65283.00109\44191273.1
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.69.050 BONDS MAY BE REQUIRED.

Prior to the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit, the city may require a cash bond to be deposited with the city for the purpose of defraying the costs of enforcement and property damage repair or cleanup by the city, in the event the permittee fails to do so. The amount of cash bond shall be established by the Director or Planning Commission in the permit conditions of approval. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.69.060 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES.
(A) General. Each site occupied by a temporary use shall be left free of debris, litter, or any other evidence of the temporary use and shall thereafter be used only in accordance with the requirements of the zone district in which the site is located. (B) Temporary structures and enclosures. Temporary structures and enclosures, including camping tents and framed vehicle covers, are prohibited except as part of a festival, party or event for duration not to exceed ten consecutive days.
(C) Art and craft shows and exhibits. A Temporary Use Permit for outdoor art and craft shows and exhibits, or any similar use is subject to the following condition:
(1) Outdoor art and craft shows and exhibits shall be limited to 15 days of operation or exhibition at any one location within any 90-day period. (2) The applicant shall agree to register the City of Santa Paula as the point-of-sale for every sales transaction at the event, and all sales taxes collected for such sales shall be registered as having been collected in the city.
(3) A written report of all sales proceeds and the taxes collected thereon shall be furnished to the Finance Department within one week after the sales event. (D) Construction office, real estate office or caretaker mobile home. A Temporary Use Permit for a construction office, real estate office, temporary caretaker mobile home, or any similar use is subject to the following condition:
(1) Such office or residence shall only be permitted on the site of an active construction project.
(2) Only one construction office, one real estate office or one temporary caretaker residence shall be permitted on a site.
(3) A building permit is required to install such structures. (4) Such office or residence shall be removed upon issuance of an occupancy permit for the primary permitted use.
(E) Carnivals, circuses, fairs, and similar uses. A Temporary Use Permit for a carnival, circus, fair, or any similar use is subject to the following conditions:
(1) Adequate vehicular and pedestrian access shall be provided. (2) Adequate off-street parking shall be provided.
(3) All noise, dust, and other objectionable elements shall be abated. (4) Animals that cause excessive noise, odor, or disturbing elements shall not be permitted on the premises.
(5) The site shall be cleaned and restored within one week of termination of the use.

Deleted: Planning
182
65283.00109\44191273.1
(6) The applicant shall agree to register the City of Santa Paula as the point-of-sale for every sales transaction at the event, and all sales taxes collected for such sales shall be registered as having been collected in the city.
(7) A written report of all sales proceeds and the taxes collected thereon shall be furnished to the Finance Department within one week after the sales event. (F) Christmas tree, pumpkin, flower and similar seasonal outdoor sales. A Temporary Use Permit for a seasonal outdoor sale is subject to the following conditions:
(1) A temporary seasonal sales facility shall not be open for business more than a total of 40 days during any one calendar year.
(2) A permitted temporary seasonal sales facility shall not engage in the sale of any merchandise not directly associated with the specific holiday for which the sale is being held. (3) After the holiday, the facility shall be removed and the premises cleared of all debris and restored to at least as good a condition as existed prior to the establishment of the facility. (4) A permitted temporary seasonal sales facility shall not be located within the public right of way, within the required handicapped access way, or on required parking for a property. (5) The applicant shall agree to register the City of Santa Paula as the point-of-sale for every sales transaction at the event, and all sales taxes collected for such sales shall be registered as having been collected in the city.
(6) A written report of all sales proceeds and the taxes collected thereon shall be furnished to the Finance Department within one week after the sales event. (7) The Director may impose any other conditions deemed necessary to protect general health, welfare, and peace of the surrounding area. (G) Parking lot and other outdoor sales.
(1) Parking lot and sidewalk sales, not to include automotive sales events as outlined under (H) below, shall be limited to one sale per calendar quarter and not more than four sales events per year are permitted outright on commercially zoned property, subject to the following conditions.
(a) Sponsored by an established, fixed business on the same property. (b) The merchandise is normally sold by the business.
(c) Such events shall be limited to three consecutive days of operation for a regular weekend, or four consecutive days for any weekend that includes a national holiday. (d) A Temporary Use Permit shall be required for more than four such events in a calendar year on a single property.
(2) A Temporary Use Permit for outdoor rummage sales, outdoor auctions and other outdoor sales, not to include parking lot and sidewalk sales as discussed above, is subject to the following conditions:
(a) Sponsored and operated by a local nonprofit organization or a business on the same property.
(b) Such events shall be limited to one sales event every six months. (c) Such events shall be limited to three consecutive days of operation for a regular weekend, or four consecutive days for any weekend that includes a national holiday. (d) The applicant shall agree to register the City of Santa Paula as the pointof-sale for every sales transaction at the event, and all sales taxes collected for such sales shall be registered as having been collected in the city.

Deleted: Planning
183
65283.00109\44191273.1
(e) A written report of all sales proceeds and the taxes collected thereon shall be furnished to the Finance Department within one week after the sales event. (f) The Director may impose any other conditions deemed necessary to protect general health, welfare, and peace of the surrounding area. (H) Automotive sales events. A Temporary Use Permit for an automotive sales event, to include a “tent” event for the sale of automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, trailers, recreational vehicles or boats, is subject to the following conditions:
(1) Automotive sales events shall be permitted only on sites that meet all of the following criteria:
(a) Commercially zoned property; and
(b) Site exceeds one acre in size; and
(c) Site has excess parking spaces available above the number of parking spaces required for the existing uses on the property, in accordance with Chapter 16.46 of this Title 16.

The event shall not be located on any of the required parking spaces for the existing uses on the property, unless such use is not operating at the same time as the event. (2) Automotive sales events shall be limited to no more than ten events in a calendar year on a single property, with a maximum of two such events on a single property within the same 30 day period.
(3) Such events shall be limited to three consecutive days of operation for a regular weekend, or four consecutive days for any weekend that includes a national holiday. (4) A Conditional Use Permit shall be required for more than ten automotive sales events in a calendar year on a single property.
(5) The site layout for the event shall comply with current building and fire codes for the State of California and the City of Santa Paula, and shall be reviewed by the Building & Safety Department and Fire Department accordingly.
(6) The applicant shall agree to register the City of Santa Paula as the point-of-sale for every sales transaction at the event, and all sales taxes collected for such sales shall be registered as having been collected in the city.
(7) A written report of all sales proceeds and the taxes collected thereon shall be furnished to the Finance Department within one week after the sales event. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.69.070 SIGNAGE FOR TEMPORARY EVENTS.
(A) Signage for temporary uses is permitted, provided such signage complies with regulations set forth in Chapter 16.24 (Signs) of this Title 16. (B) All signage for a temporary use shall be removed within two days of the termination of the use. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.70: HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT
Section

16.70.010 Purpose and intent

16.70.020 Initiation

16.70.030 Proceedings

16.70.040 Prohibited home occupations
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 48
Deleted: 16.230
Deleted: 16.230
Deleted: 16.230
Deleted: 16.230
184
65283.00109\44191273.1

16.70.050 Conditions of approval

16.70.060 Home occupation performance standards

16.70.070 Fines and penalties
§ 16.70.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.
(A) The city recognizes that an occupant of a residential property has a limited right to conduct non-obtrusive business from a residence, and that the average neighbor generally will prefer to have that business conducted in such a fashion that neighbors are unaware of its existence. This chapter is established to allow such home occupations to exist, provided the residential character of residential neighborhoods is maintained and further provided safeguards are established to prevent the use of home occupations from transforming the use of a residence into a commercial use or a residential neighborhood into a commercial one.
(B) Home occupations encourage and promote efforts to reduce traffic congestion and the generation of pollutants by allowing and recognizing changing work environments, including telecommuting and work-at-home options. Such businesses are allowed in the city subject to the regulations of this chapter.
(Ord. 1162, passed 6-19-06)
§ 16.70.020 INITIATION.
(A) An application for a home occupation permit may be initiated by any occupant of the residence. For rental property, written authorization for the proposed use must be given by the property owner or the property owner’s representative.
(B) An application must be filed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.55 (Applications, Processing, Filing, and Fees) of this Title 16.
(C) A business license tax must be paid pursuant to Chapter 110 of the Municipal Code. (Ord. 1162, passed 6-19-06)
§ 16.70.030 PROCEEDINGS.
(A) The establishment of a home occupation within any residential dwelling unit will be regulated by a one-time application and fee.
(B) An application for a home occupation permit must be submitted to the Planning Department on forms supplied by the Department. The applicant must provide information required by the application and any additional information requested by the Planning Department to assist in the review of the permit request.
(C) The application must be referred to the Director or appointed designee for review and to determine compliance with the provisions of this chapter. The Director or designee will have the authority to consult with other city departments regarding the proposed application. As part of the application review an inspection by the Building and Safety Department will be conducted. (D) Within ten days of receiving a completed application, the Director will act to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. Any decision of the Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Chapter 16.57 (Appeals and Revocations) of this Title 16. (E) The dwelling in which the home occupation is being conducted shall be open for inspection to city personnel, at reasonable times during normal business hours, for the purpose of inspecting to determine whether or not the conditions of this section are being complied with. (Ord. 1162, passed 6-19-06)
§ 16.70.040 PROHIBITED HOME OCCUPATIONS.

Deleted: 16.230
Deleted: 16.230
Deleted: 16.230
Deleted: 16.202
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.206
185
65283.00109\44191273.1
The following uses, either by operation or nature, are not incidental to or compatible with residential activities and shall not be permitted as home occupations:
(A) Adult businesses including escort services, massage parlors and the making of adult movies.
(B) Animal boarding, breeding or grooming facilities.
(C) Automotive and other vehicle repair (body or mechanical) upholstery, painting or storage. (D) Barber or beauty shop.
(E) Carpentry or cabinet making.
(F) Firearms/weapons dealerships.
(G) Retail sales.
(H) Welding or machine operation.
(I) Any other use, as determined by the Director not to be incidental to or compatible with residential activities.
(Ord. 1162, passed 6-19-06)
§ 16.70.050 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.

The Director or appointed designee will have the authority to impose conditions on a home occupation permit to ensure compliance with the intent of this Title 16, including compliance with the performance standards contained in 16.70.060 below.
(Ord. 1162, passed 6-19-06)
§ 16.70.060 HOME OCCUPATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.
(A) Home occupations are uses that do not interrupt or interfere with the general nature or residential character of the residential neighborhood in which they are located. (B) All permitted home occupations must comply with the following performance standards:
(1) A home occupation business must be clearly incidental to the residential use of the property, and the dwelling unit must be the principal residence of the home occupation business owner.
(2) Home occupations cannot generate pedestrian or vehicular traffic beyond that considered normal within the surrounding residential district. (3) A home occupation must be conducted within a dwelling unit, or within an approved accessory structure. Accessory buildings used for home occupations must comply with the provisions of this Code, cannot contain kitchen facilities, and may only be located within single-family residential zones.
(4) Not more than 25% of the existing square footage of a dwelling unit up to a maximum of 500 square feet may be used for the home occupation business. (5) The operation of a home occupation cannot interfere with the maintenance of any required parking spaces, including spaces required to be provided within a garage. (6) The appearance of the dwelling or accessory structure within which the home occupation is conducted cannot be altered (for example, but without limitation, by using color, materials, construction, lighting, signs, sounds, noises, vibrations, or equipment displays) to make it recognizable as serving a nonresidential use.
(7) The home occupation permit applicant and other persons who use the dwelling as their primary residence may be involved in the home occupation use. All residents involved in the home occupation use must be listed on the application. In addition, one nonresident employee or Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.230
186
65283.00109\44191273.1
independent contractor, whether paid or not for their services, may be involved in the home occupation use on the property provided that there is only one such person on the premises between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Off-street parking must be available on the site for the nonresident employee. Home occupations conducted within an accessory structure on the site are limited to resident employees only.
(8) If the business employs other persons whose work activities are performed off the premises, such individuals are not allowed to gather or congregate on the premises in connection with a home occupation.
(9) The home occupation permit is valid only for the person to whom it is issued and is void when that person moves from the dwelling unit or discontinues or alters the business so that the information provided on the application is no longer valid. Property owner’s are required to sign the home occupation permit application. Home occupation permits must be renewed every five years. (10) A maximum of two home occupation permits may be issued for any residence.

However, the limitations set forth in the performance standards are applied singularly not cumulatively. (11) No direct retail or wholesale sales may be conducted on the premises of any home occupation.
(12) Up to four customers or visitors related to the home occupation are allowed daily, during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., provided that the home occupation does not generate vehicle traffic beyond that considered characteristic of the surrounding residential district. Personal service uses involving the instruction or tutoring of an individual may be allowed subject to approval by the Director, if the use is in keeping with the stated intent of the section and not determined to be potentially detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood. (13) Deliveries or pick-ups made by a courier or delivery service as part of the home occupation are limited to two a day.
(14) Only one vehicle with a capacity not exceeding three-quarter ton may be used directly or indirectly in connection with a home occupation. No commercial vehicles may be used as part of the home occupation. Off-street parking must be provided for any vehicle used in connection with the home occupation.
(15) No signs identifying or advertising the home occupation business may be posted on the property, on other nearby residential properties, or on the public right-of-way. (16) No merchandise or products can be visible from outside the residence or accessory structure.
(17) No newspaper or other advertising is allowed which identifies the address of the residence as a place of business.
(18) Outdoor storage, display of merchandise, products, materials, supplies or operations are prohibited on the premises.
(19) Activities conducted and equipment or material used cannot change the fire safety or occupancy classification of the premises. The use cannot employ the storage of pesticides, explosives, flammable, or hazardous materials, or waste of any kind brought onto the property as part of the occupation.
(20) No use of utilities or community facilities is permitted beyond that normal to the use of the property for residential purposes.
(21) No refuse or trash can be generated in quantities or types not normally associated with residential uses.
(22) No equipment or process can be used that creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors, or electrical interference detectable off the premises. In the case of electrical interference, no equipment or process can be used that creates visual or audible interference upon any radio or television receivers off the premises, or causes fluctuations in line voltage off the premises.

Deleted: Planning
187
65283.00109\44191273.1
(Ord. 1162, passed 6-19-06; Am. Ord. 1192, passed 6-16-08) § 16.70.070 FINES AND PENALTIES.

A permittee who violates any of the performance standards listed in 16.70.050 above or any permit conditions may be subject to fines as established by resolution of the City Council and/or permit revocation pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.57 of this Title 16. (Ord. 1162, passed 6-19-06)
CHAPTER 16.71: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
Section

16.71.010 Purpose and intent

16.71.020 Initiation

16.71.030 Applicability

16.71.040 Contents of Development Agreement

16.71.050 Proceedings - Planning Commission

16.71.060 Proceedings - City Council

16.71.070 Findings and adoption

16.71.080 Recordation

16.71.090 Amendment or cancellation

16.71.100 Periodic review

16.71.110 Separate procedure

16.71.120 Effect of Development Agreement

16.71.130 Construction
§ 16.71.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.
(A) Purpose. The purpose of a Development Agreement is to ensure to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with clearly stated policies, rules and regulations, and subject to specified conditions of approval. Development Agreements also ensure that all conditions of approval, including the construction of off-site improvements made necessary by such land developments, will proceed in an orderly and economical manner to the benefit of the city.
(B) Intent. This Chapter 16.71 is enacted to achieve the maximum utilization of public and private resources in the development process, and ensure, to the extent feasible, that appropriate measures to enhance and protect the environment of the city are reached. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.020 INITIATION.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code 65865, any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property, or any person acting as the authorized agent for such property owner, may apply to the city for a Development Agreement. Applications must be filed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.55 (Applications, Processing, Filing, and Fees) of this Title 16. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.030 APPLICABILITY.

Deleted: 16.230
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.202
188
65283.00109\44191273.1
The City Council finds that it may be in the city’s best interest to enter into a Development Agreement when a project is to:
(A) Be phased over a period of years;
(B) Receive a density bonus;
(C) Consist of 20 residential units or more;
(D) Occupy more than two acres;
(E) Be a project subject to development approval pursuant to this Title 16; (F) Involve the amendment of the General Plan of the city; (G) Involve the formation of any assessment, benefit, maintenance, or special benefit district, or for the installation of required or necessary on-site or off-site improvements or infrastructure; (H) Involve mitigation measures imposed upon a development project as a consequence of the approval of an environmental impact report in which such mitigation measures are a condition as a mechanism for eliminating or reducing environmental impacts; or (I) Proceed upon a determination by the City Council to be in the best interests of the city. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.040 CONTENTS OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
(A) All draft and final Development Agreements must contain the following information:
(1) The duration of the Agreement;
(2) The permitted uses of the property;
(3) The density or intensity of permitted uses;
(4) The maximum height and size of proposed buildings; and (5) Provisions for reservation or dedication of lands for public purposes. (B) The Development Agreement may also contain the following information:
(1) Conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions, provided such conditions, terms, provisions, and requirements do not prevent development of land for the purposes and level of use set forth in the Agreement. (2) Requirements that construction be commenced within a specified time period, and that the project or any phase thereof be completed within a specified time frame. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.050 PROCEEDINGS - PLANNING COMMISSION.
(A) Upon receiving a Development Agreement application, the Director will make a determination as to whether the application is complete. If deemed incomplete, the application will be returned to the applicant for further information. In deemed complete, the Director will review the application and determine the additional requirements necessary to complete the Agreement. (B) The Director will prepare a report outlining facts and recommendations relative to the application. The report will be provided to the Planning Commission prior to any scheduled public hearing on the application.
(C) A public hearing before the Planning Commission will be noticed and conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings).
(D) The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the Development Agreement application.

Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.204
189
65283.00109\44191273.1
(E) As part of its recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission may recommend use of a Development Agreement as a method of implementing or providing standards and criteria for any development approval so long as the development meets the applicability requirements set forth in this Chapter 16.71.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.060 PROCEEDINGS - CITY COUNCIL.
(A) A public hearing before the City Council will be noticed and conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.56 (Public Hearings) of this Title 16. (B) At the hearing, the City Council will consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation together with any additional public testimony, and may approve, disapprove, or modify any recommendation of the Planning Commission. If public testimony is presented on an issue that was not considered by the Planning Commission, the City Council may refer the issue back to the Planning Commission for further hearings and recommendations.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.070 FINDINGS AND ADOPTION.
(A) Findings required. When acting to approve a Development Agreement application, or approve in modified form, the City Council will be required to make the following findings on the Agreement:
(1) The proposed Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and any applicable specific plans; (2) The proposed Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the zone in which the real property is or will be located; (3) The proposed Agreement will promote public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practice;
(4) The proposed Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values; and
(5) The proposed Agreement will promote and encourage the development of the proposed project.
(B) Adoption by ordinance. If the City Council approves the Development Agreement, it will do so by adoption of an ordinance. The city may enter into the Agreement after the ordinance approving the Development Agreement takes effect.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.080 RECORDATION.

Within ten calendar days after the city enters into the Development Agreement, the City Clerk will record the Agreement with the Ventura County Recorder. If the parties to the Agreement or their successors in interest amend or cancel the Agreement as provided in 16.71.090 of this Chapter 16.71, or if the city terminates or modifies the Agreement as provided in 16.71.090 of this Chapter 16.71 for failure of the applicant to comply in good faith with the terms or conditions of the Agreement, the City Clerk will record notice of such action with the County Recorder.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.090 AMENDMENT OR CANCELLATION.
(A) Initiation of amendment or cancellation. Any Development Agreement may be canceled or amended by mutual consent of the parties.

Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.204
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
190
65283.00109\44191273.1
(B) Procedures.
(1) Cancellation or modification by mutual consent. Any proposal to cancel or modify a Development Agreement will be heard and determined in accordance with the procedures specified by this Chapter 16.71 for approval of a Development Agreement. (2) Cancellation by city. If, at any time during the term of a Development Agreement, it is found that the party to the Agreement has not complied with the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement, a public hearing will be held by the City Council at which time the party to the Agreement will be given the opportunity to demonstrate otherwise. The burden of proof will be upon the party to the Agreement to show compliance by substantial evidence. If such compliance is not shown, the City Council may either cancel the Development Agreement, or continue the Agreement on such terms and conditions as it may consider appropriate under the circumstances. (C) Rights of the parties after cancellation or termination. (1) In the event that a Development Agreement is canceled or otherwise terminated, unless otherwise agreed, all rights of the party to the Agreement or successors in interest under the Development Agreement will terminate.
(2) Any and all benefits, including money or land, received by the city will be retained by the city.
(3) Notwithstanding the above provisions, any termination of a Development Agreement will not revoke a valid building permit previously issued by the city for any improvement authorized by the Development Agreement. All such completed or completing uses will, to the extent possible, be deemed nonconforming uses, and will be subject to the nonconforming use provisions of this Title 16.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.100 PERIODIC REVIEW.
(A) Time for and initiation of review. The city will review all Development Agreements once every 12 months after the city enters into such Agreements. (B) Applicant’s submission. Between 45 and 60 days prior to the yearly anniversary of the date a Development Agreement was entered into, the party to the Agreement or successors in interest will submit evidence to the Director of good-faith compliance with the Agreement and will notify the Director in writing that such evidence is being submitted to the city pursuant to the periodic review requirements of this section. Said notification will be accompanied by a processing fee as specified in the city’s fee schedule.
(C) Findings of compliance. If the party to the Agreement or successors in interest has complied with the terms of the Development Agreement, a finding of compliance will be issued, which may be recorded by the Party to the Agreement or successors in interest with the Ventura County Recorder.
(D) Finding of noncompliance. If, on the basis of substantial evidence, it is found that the party to the Agreement or successor in interest has not complied with the terms of the Development Agreement, the party to the Agreement or successor in interest will be notified in writing of the grounds of noncompliance. A reasonable time period will be specified in which the party to the Agreement or successor in interest must comply. If the party to the Agreement or successor in interest does not comply within the time limits prescribed, the Development Agreement will be subject to cancellation pursuant to

16.71.090 of this Chapter 16.71.
(E) Appeal of determination. Upon the payment of the required fee, any interested person may file an appeal of the issuance of a finding of compliance, or notice of noncompliance, to the City Council within ten calendar days after the date of issuance or notice. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.110 SEPARATE PROCEDURE.

Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
191
65283.00109\44191273.1
The Development Agreement process set forth in this Chapter 16.71 will be separate from other land use planning procedures. If so specified in the Development Agreement, it will constitute an approval pursuant to such planning procedures as if separately enacted under city planning ordinances or resolutions.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.120 EFFECT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

When approved, the Development Agreement and any development control maps and all notations, references, and regulations that are a part of the Development Agreement will be part of the Development Agreement ordinance. Development control maps include, but are not limited to, regulations intended to carry out any plan respecting location or type of activities; height, bulk, siding, or design of structures; location or design of open areas; and landscaping and other comparable regulations. (Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
§ 16.71.130 CONSTRUCTION.

This Chapter 16.71 and any subsequent Development Agreement will be read together. With respect to any Development Agreement enacted under this Chapter 16.71, any provision of such a Development Agreement that is in conflict with this Chapter 16.71 will be void. Unless otherwise provided by the Development Agreement, the city’s rules, regulations, and official policies governing permitted uses of land, governing density, and governing design, improvement construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the property subject to a Development Agreement will be those City rules, regulations, and official policies in force at the time of the approval, or modification, of the Development Agreement by the City Council; provided, however, that the party to the Agreement or successor in interest is subject to all increases in city- imposed fees, dedication requirements, and charges with respect to subsequent applications for development and construction within the property subject to a Development Agreement.
(Ord. 1104, passed 7-19-04)
CHAPTER 16.72: ANNEXATIONS
Section

16.72.010 Purpose and intent

16.72.020 Relationship to other laws

16.72.030 Definitions

16.72.040 Initiation

16.72.050 Annexation procedures

16.72.060 Pre-application conference required

16.72.070 Preparation and content

16.72.080 School agreement

16.72.090 Infrastructure improvement description

16.72.100 Planning Commission review and action

16.72.110 City Council review and action

16.72.120 City Council findings required

16.72.130 Proceed to LAFCO
§ 16.72.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.

Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.234
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
Deleted: 16.236
192
65283.00109\44191273.1
This chapter is established in accordance with the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Cal. Gov’t Code §56000 et seq.) to address annexations, reorganizations, consolidations and similar procedures of the city.
(Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.020 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAWS.

Any provision of this chapter that is more stringent than federal or state law is intended to supplement, not conflict with, federal or state law and to apply unless a court of law conclusively determines that the provision is preempted. Nothing in this section precludes the city from establishing the time limits for completion of the annexation proceedings and initiation of project requiring such approvals, provided such time limits are authorized by law. (Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.030 DEFINITIONS.

Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following definitions govern the construction of the words and phrases used in this chapter.

ACT means the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Cal. Gov’t Code §56000 et seq.), and any subsequently adopted amendments or successor statutes. Unless specified otherwise, all citations in this chapter to an unspecified code are to the California Government Code;
CEQA means, collectively, the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§21000, et seq.) the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”), and the city’s Environmental Guidelines;
LAFCO means the Ventura Local Agency Formation Commission.

LCA CONTRACT means a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §51200 et seq.)
CURB BOUNDARY means a City Urban Restriction Boundary established in accordance with the Santa Paula General Plan.
(Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.040 INITIATION.
(A) Annexation applications with the city may be initiated by:
(1) An application by an owner or agent of such owner seeking an annexation of property to the city’s jurisdiction;
(2) The application of a public agency authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain; or
(3) The City Council.
(B) An application must be filed in accordance with this Code. (Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.050 ANNEXATION PROCEDURES.

Annexations, reorganizations, consolidations and similar procedures must be processed in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
(Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.060 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REQUIRED.
193
65283.00109\44191273.1
A pre-application conference with the Director, or designee, is required before the formal submission of an annexation application. During the pre-application conference, the Director, or designee, will review with the applicant the city’s requirements for application content; anticipated plans, reports, and studies required for the annexation application; applicable policies; infrastructure needs; and other information determined by the Director. In addition, the Director will inform the applicant whether a Specific Plan, Development Agreement, or other, similar, discretionary approval is required for a proposed annexation. (Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.070 PREPARATION AND CONTENT.

As part of an annexation application, the applicant must provide the following:
(A) An application for pre-zoning;
(B) If applicable, an application for a zone change;
(C) Proof of ownership, legal description, and proof of consent or dissent to the application of all persons with an ownership interest in the real property proposed for annexation; (D) An identification of LCA contracts; CURB boundary amendments; Sphere of Influence boundary adjustments; or other applicable property restrictions that may be required for annexation; (E) Boundary map, prepared by a civil engineer or licensed surveyor, in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Surveyor’s Office. At a minimum, a boundary map submitted to the city must contain the following information:
(1) A sufficient legal description of the land to define the boundaries of the proposed annexation of land.
(2) The date, north arrow, and scale.
(3) The name and address of the property owner(s), and the civil engineer or licensed surveyor under whose direction the map was prepared, including the registration number of the engineer or surveyor and the names and addresses of all operators of the utility systems of the subdivision.
(4) The existing topography of land proposed to be annexed using contour intervals as follows: One foot when the slope of the ground is less than 5%; two feet when the slope of the ground is between 5% and 10%; five feet when the slope of the ground is between 10% and 25%; and ten feet when the slope of the ground is greater than 25%.
(5) The approximate location and outline to scale of each building or structure on each property proposed for annexation. Each building shown must be identified by street address or other identifying feature, and include a notation on whether each building, structure, fence, wall, or land use will be retained.
(6) The locations of any existing water wells and septic tanks, and descriptions of the proposed source of water supply and the proposed method of sewage disposal. (7) The width, purpose, and approximate location of all easements or rights-of-way, whether public or private, within and adjacent to the annexation. (8) The approximate location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow and the location, width, and direction of flow of each watercourse and existing flood control district channels within one-half mile of the exterior boundaries of the proposed annexation. (9) Through the application review process, the City Engineer or Director may require that additional information be included on the map to provide important or necessary disclosures or other information;
(F) A fiscal impact analysis unless the annexation application is for public facilities, public open space and parkland, and island annexations under five acres; Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
Deleted: Planning
194
65283.00109\44191273.1
(G) Any memorandum of understanding with public school districts (“School Agreement”) affected by the proposed annexation as required by this chapter unless the proposed annexation includes public facilities, public open space and parkland, and island annexations under five acres; (H) Identification of any geologic hazards;
(I) A written commitment to transfer or otherwise dedicate to the city, at an appropriate time following the effective date of the annexation, all water rights associated with the property; (J) If required, a Specific Plan in conformance with this Code; and (K) All applicable LAFCO fees.
(Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.080 SCHOOL AGREEMENT.

Before applying for annexation, an applicant must enter into a School Agreement with each impacted public school district that addresses all issues associated with a proposed project including, without limitation, any capital costs associated with new or expanded school facilities. (Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.090 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION.

The annexation application must include a complete description of the proposed source, distribution, location, extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the annexation and needed to support the land uses. Such information may be provided on a tentative map if a subdivision is proposed.
(Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.100 PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION.
(A) A complete annexation application will be considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing.
(B) By resolution, the Planning Commission may recommend that the City Council approve, approve with modifications, or deny a proposed annexation application. (C) A proposed annexation inconsistent with the General Plan may not be recommended or adopted until the General Plan is amended to eliminate such inconsistency. Such a General Plan amendment and any development proposal relying on the amendment must be considered concurrently with the annexation application.
(Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.110 CITY COUNCIL REVIEW AND ACTION.
(A) After receiving a Planning Commission resolution, the City Clerk will set the matter for a public hearing before the City Council.
(B) Following the public hearing, the City Council will, by resolution, approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed annexation application along with any other discretionary approvals required for a proposed annexation.
(C) If an application is approved, the City Council will direct the City Manager or designee to forward the annexation application to LAFCO for approval. (Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.120 CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS REQUIRED.
195
65283.00109\44191273.1
The City Council must make the following findings before approving an annexation:
(A) That the proposed annexation is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan;
(B) That the proposed annexation will not adversely or significantly impact surrounding properties;
(C) That the proposed annexation promotes public health, safety, or general welfare and serves the goals and purposes of this Code;
(D) That the city has sufficient capacity and ability for providing all city services upon annexation, or within a reasonable time of annexation; and (E) That the proposed annexation will pay for itself and will not bring any fiscal or economic burden onto the city. The City Council may deny annexation applications for projects which fail to demonstrate in the fiscal impact analysis that projected annual total revenues generated by the project will equal or exceed the projected annual aggregate costs for municipal services. (Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
§ 16.72.130 PROCEED TO LAFCO.
(A) Upon City Council approval of the proposed annexation, the City Manager or designee will file a certified copy of the City Council resolution and application for reorganization with LAFCO, in accordance with the provisions of the Act and LAFCO rules. (B) The city will oppose any annexation application filed with LAFCO that did not obtain approval in conformance with this chapter.
(Ord. 1133, passed 4-4-05)
CHAPTER 16.73: 81 ACRE INITIATIVE IMPLEMENTATION
Section

16.73.010 Purpose

16.73.020 Administration of chapter

16.73.030 Definitions

16.73.040 Applicability

16.73.050 Exemptions

16.73.060 Environmental assessment

16.73.070 One vote required

16.73.080 Sunset Clause
§ 16.73.010 PURPOSE.

This chapter implements Section III(G) of the Santa Paula General Plan by establishing specific procedures and parameters needed to approve proposed development projects comprising 81 or more acres in size. The voters of the city adopted Measure L6, the “Citizens Advocating Responsible Expansion Initiative,” on November 7, 2006 which amended the Land Use Element of the General Plan.

This chapter is intended to clarify the law to avoid needless confusion, duplication of effort, and uncertainty for persons seeking city approvals for large development projects and for city officials responsible for enforcing applicable law.
(Ord. 1188, passed 2-19-08)
§ 16.73.020 ADMINISTRATION OF CHAPTER.

Deleted: 16.237
Deleted: 16.237
Deleted: 16.237
Deleted: 16.237
Deleted: 16.237
Deleted: 16.237
Deleted: 16.237
Deleted: 16.237
196
65283.00109\44191273.1
The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to implement this chapter in a manner consistent with the California Constitution and other applicable law including, without limitation, Section III(G) of the Santa Paula General Plan.
(Ord. 1188, passed 2-19-08)
§ 16.73.030 DEFINITIONS.

Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following definitions govern the construction of the words and phrases used in this chapter. Words and phrases not defined by this chapter have the meaning set forth in the Initiative (as defined below) or, if neither set forth in the Initiative or this chapter, other provisions of this Code.
(A) CEQA means the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §21000, et seq.) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §15000, et seq.). (B) CURB means the City Urban Restriction Boundary regulated by Section III(F), and graphically depicted in Figure LU-4a, of the Santa Paula General Plan. (C) DATE OF DETERMINATION means the date upon which an application for development is deemed complete in accordance with this Code.
(D) DENSITY means the one of the following:
(1) For residential development, density is the total number of permanent residential dwelling units per acre of land, exclusive of all existing public streets and rights-of-way. (2) For commercial development, density is the total gross area of all buildings on a lot divided by the lot area (known as floor area ratio) or the total square feet designated by the General Plan or this Code for a particular lot area.
(E) DEVELOPMENT means any activity which requires a discretionary or ministerial permit to construct commercial, industrial, institutional, or residential structures. DEVELOPMENT also includes the term “land use designation” as defined by this chapter. (F) GPA means an amendment to the Santa Paula General Plan. (G) INTENSIFICATION OF USE means a GPA seeking to increase density or land use intensity (or both) that is subject to the Initiative and this chapter. (H) INITIATIVE means Measure L6 as enacted by voters on November 7, 2006, and certified by Resolution No. 6358 on December 4, 2006, as codified by Ordinance No. 1188, adopted on February 19, 2008.
(I) LAND USE DESIGNATION means a designation set forth in the Santa Paula General Plan Land Use Map (Figure LU-5) and defined by Santa Paula General Plan Table LU-7 or such other land use proposed by an application for a GPA and not previously identified in the General Plan. (J) LAND USE INTENSITY means those urbanized land uses identified in General Plan Table LU-7 under the column captioned “Principal Use Development Intensity/Density.” Land use intensity does not include non-urbanized uses such as agricultural, open space, recreational, golf, or mining.
(K) PLANNING AREA means real property located within the city’s jurisdictional boundaries, its approved Sphere of Influence, and such additional areas that are identified by the Santa Paula General Plan and other applicable law.
(L) SOAR means Section III(F) of the Santa Paula General Plan, added by Measure I as enacted by voters on November 7, 2000, and certified by Resolution No. 5407, adopted on December 4, 2000.
(Ord. 1188, passed 2-19-08)
§ 16.73.040 APPLICABILITY.
197
65283.00109\44191273.1
The Initiative and this chapter apply to any application for a development which meets all of the following criteria:
(A) The application seeks an Intensification of Use;
(B) The proposed Intensification of Use would regulate either:
(1) A development entirely located upon real property that constitutes 81 or more contiguous acres; or
(2) A development located on real property which is contiguous to other land for which the City Council previously approved an Intensification of Use within the five calendar years preceding the date of determination when all of the real property regulated by the previously approved and proposed Intensification of Use equals 81 or more contiguous acres; (C) The real property affected by the proposed Intensification of Use is located within the Planning Area;
(D) The 81 or more contiguous acres of real property are found by the City Council, based upon substantial evidence, to be:
(1) Part of, or substantially related to, a development previously approved by the City Council;
(2) Completely owned by the same person or persons; or
(3) Separately owned by persons who are part of a joint venture, or similar cooperative enterprise, who are jointly seeking development approvals for a single or multiple developments.
(Ord. 1188, passed 2-19-08)
§ 16.73.050 EXEMPTIONS.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Initiative and this chapter do not apply to an Intensification of Use required by California law mandates including, without limitation, Government Code 65588, if the Intensification of Use would affect only real property located completely within the city’s jurisdictional boundaries as they exist on the date of determination. (Ord. 1188, passed 2-19-08)
§ 16.73.060 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.

GPAs subject to the Initiative and this chapter require environmental review in accordance with

16.55.050. If required by CEQA, a final environmental impact report must be certified before the City Council can consider placing a GPA on the ballot in accordance with Elections Code 9222. (Ord. 1188, passed 2-19-08)
§ 16.73.070 ONE VOTE REQUIRED.

To reconcile the Initiative with SOAR requirements; to implement both SOAR and the Initiative; and to facilitate voter understanding of ballot measures, the City Council can take the following actions regarding an application for Intensification of Use:
(A) The City Council can deem an application which requires voter approval to both change the CURB and approve an Intensification of Use as a single GPA requiring one ballot measure for voter consideration;
(B) When voters previously approved a CURB change in accordance with SOAR which also included an Intensification of Use in the ballot measure, and an application for development does not propose an additional Intensification of Use, then the City Council can approve a GPA upon its own authority.

Deleted: 16.202
198
65283.00109\44191273.1
(Ord. 1188, passed 2-19-08)
§ 16.73.080 SUNSET CLAUSE.

This chapter is repealed and will become ineffective on December 31, 2025, unless a later adopted initiative measure approved by the voters at the general election before or in November, 2025 deletes or extends the effective date of the Initiative.
(Ord. 1188, passed 2-19-08)
CHAPTER 16.74: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
Section

16.74.01 Purpose

16.74.02 Definitions

16.74.03 Fees

16.74.04 Administration by Director

16.74.05 Initiation

16.74.06 General application requirements

16.74.07 Proceedings

16.74.08 Action by the Director

16.74.09 Findings

16.74.10 Permit appeal and revocation

16.74.11 Compliance with SDP

16.74.12 Timeliness

16.74.13 Action in writing

16.74.14 Final determination
§ 16.74.01 PURPOSE.
(A) The purpose of a SDP is to provide for the administrative review of detailed development plans for a proposed use. Uses that require a SDP are characterized by having a relatively low potential for adverse impacts on the subject site or surrounding community. (B) A SDP is a plan for development and must include the following:
(1) A description of the use(s) and operating characteristics. (2) A plot plan showing the location of all uses.
(3) Supplementary exhibits, as necessary, to show other information which may be required such as building elevations, landscaping, and grading. (4) Conditions of approval.
(Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.02 DEFINITIONS.

Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following definitions will govern the construction of the words and phrases used in this chapter:

DIRECTOR - Means the Community and Economic Development Director Director, or designee.

Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: Planning
199
65283.00109\44191273.1
SDP - Means a site development permit regulated by this chapter. (Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.03 FEES.

Persons applying for a permit under this chapter must pay a permit fee established by City Council resolution.
(Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.04 ADMINISTRATION BY DIRECTOR.

The Director will administer this chapter, including, without limitation, acting on all applications for a permit required by this chapter.
(Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.05 INITIATION.

An application for a SDP may be initiated by any person who is able to demonstrate a legally vested real property interest in the real property affected by a proposed application. The authorized agent of any such person may also initiate an application. The Director may request proof of ownership or authorization to apply before accepting any application. (Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.06 GENERAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS.

Applications for a permit required by this chapter must be filed with the Planning Department; be in a form and contain the information prescribed by the Director; and be accompanied by the permit fee required by this chapter.
(Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.07 PROCEEDINGS.
(A) Unless the Director determinates otherwise, issuing a SDP is an administrative determination by the Director without the need for a public hearing. (B) Upon acceptance of a SDP application as complete, the Director must review the application for conformance with the provisions of this Title 16. Based on this review, the Director must act to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application. (C) Within 30 days of receiving a completed application, the Director must issue a statement of decisions and findings. The statement must recite, among other things, the facts and reasons for granting or denying the application.
(Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.08 ACTION BY THE DIRECTOR.

The Director or, if applicable, the Planning Commission, may take one of the following actions:
(A) Approval. There are no conditions or requirements other than those specified by the application. After the date of final determination, the proposed project may be developed in compliance with the SDP issued by the Director.
(B) Disapproval. When a SDP application is disapproved, an application for the same project on the same property cannot thereafter be accepted for a period of one year from the date of final determination, except that the Director may specify that, if the action is due to details or technical issues, this time limit does not apply. This limitation is not applicable to other discretionary permits.

Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
200
65283.00109\44191273.1
(C) Conditional approval. Any application may be approved subject to conditions the Director deems necessary for compliance with city, state and federal regulations related to the protection of general health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding area. After the date of final determination, the proposed project may be developed in compliance with the SDP issued by the Director along with applicable conditions of approval.
(D) Withdrawal. With the concurrence of or at the request of the applicant, any a permit application may be withdrawn. When an application is withdrawn, such action is effective immediately and is not subject to appeal. Thereafter, such application is null and void and the property must have the same status as if no application had been filed.
(Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.09 FINDINGS.

The Director must make all the following findings to issue a SDP:
(A) CEQA. The SDP complies with the California Environmental Quality Act. (B) General Plan. The proposed use or project conforms with the General Plan. (C) Zoning. The proposed use or project conforms with the zoning regulations in this code. (D) Development standards. The SDP complies with Chapter 16.40 of this code. (Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.10 PERMIT APPEAL AND REVOCATION.

A SDP may be appealed or revoked pursuant to Chapter 16.57 of this code. (Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.11 COMPLIANCE WITH SDP.

Establishment, maintenance and operation of the use or uses proposed by the application must comply with the information and specifications shown on the SDP. (Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.12 TIMELINESS.

If the Director does not take action within one year from the date the application is deemed complete, such application is considered to be approved. However, the applicant may request an extension of time up to 120 days. This time limit period is not applicable with regard to the time in which the Planning Commission or, if applicable, the City Council may act on an appeal. (Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.13 ACTION IN WRITING.

The determination on each application, including any required findings and any other reasons that serve to explain the determination, and all conditions of approval, must be in writing. A copy of the written determination must forwarded to the applicant following the date of final determination and is made available, at cost, to any person desiring a copy of such determination. (Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
§ 16.74.14 FINAL DETERMINATION.

The determination of the Director is effective 15 days after the date the decision is made and after all appeals, if any, are resolved.
(Ord. 1242, passed 5-7-12)
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.206
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
Deleted: 16.238
201
65283.00109\44191273.1
202
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
Subject: APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 12.A

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Recommends that the City Council:

Appoint applicants to various Commissions and Committees.

Presented by: Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
BACKGROUND:

The City Clerk's office published the Vacancy Notices for all open positions on Commissions, Committees and Boards, in the Santa Paula Times and on the City website and social media during the months of August and September.

The City Council held applicant interviews on October 14, 2025 to fill the following:

Parks & Recreation Commission (Youth) to fill one vacancy for a one-year term.

Applicants: Lorena Long and Natalia Mancilla are new applicants. Staff recommends Council consider appointment. If one applicant for Parks & Recreation Commission (Youth) is appointed, the Youth opening will be filled.

Parks & Recreation Commission to fill two vacancies for a three-year term.

Applicants: Valeria Ramirez Casas, Brady Mang and Tessa Lenz are new applicants.

Also, applicant Vanessa Olmos is a returning member. Staff recommends Council consider appointments. If two applicants for Parks & Recreation Commission are appointed, this commission will be filled.

Planning Commission to fill one partial term ending May 2, 2027. Applicants: Timothy Eubanks, Joseph Cervantez, David ross, Christina Ines-Solis Cheryl Monzon, Brittany Martinez and Joseph Parisio are new applicants. Staff recommends Council consider appointment. If one applicant is appointed, this committee will be filled.

Senior Advisory Committee to fill two vacancies for two-year terms. Applicants:

Sylivia Delossantos-Rasey is a new applicant. Also, applicant Veronica Giron-Stone is a returning member. Staff recommends Council consider appointments. If both applicants are appointed, this committee will be filled.

ANALYSIS:
203
At this time the Council may choose to make appointments to fill Commission or Committee vacancies.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is not a goal or objective in City Council's two-year Strategic Plan, however, it supports the Councils vision to provide the residents of Santa Paula with sustainable resources and programs to make this a great place to live and grow.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

There are no associated fiscal impacts from this item.

OPTIONS:

City Council may also decline to appoint one or more applicants and direct staff to publish openings again for additional applicants. Any additional applicants could be interviewed in November/December 2025.

ATTACHMENTS:
204
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: James Mason, Community & Economic Development Director Subject: INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1349 ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, 2025
EDITION (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24), THE 2024 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, AND THE 2024

INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING POOL AND SPA CODE
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 12.B

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Introduce and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 1349, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA AMENDING SECTIONS 150.001, 150.015, 150.025, 150.045, 150.055, 150.075, 150.085, 150.150, 150.160, 150.170, 150.180, 150.190, AND ADDING 150.200 AND 150.210, OF CHAPTER 150 OF THE SANTA PAULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, 2025 EDITION, (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24) INCLUDING THE 2025 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; VOLUMES 1 AND 2 OF THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA

RESIDENTIAL CODE INCLUDING APPENDICIES AH PATIO COVERS, AJ EXISTING STRUCTURES, AND AX SWIMMING POOL SAFETY ACT; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 2025

CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE INCLUDING APPENDIX M PEAK WATER DEMAND CALCULATOR; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; THE CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; THE 2024 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE; AND THE 2024

INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING POOL AND SPA CODE

2. Schedule a public hearing to consider adopting the proposed Ordinance at the City Council’s regular meeting of November 5, 2025.

4. Take such additional, related action as may be desired. 205
Presented by: Dan Schultz
BACKGROUND:

New editions of California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) of the Title 24 California Code of Regulations (CCR), are published every three years in a triennial cycle with supplemental information published during mid-cycle years. Publication of triennial editions of the CCR began in 1989. The most recent version of the code last adopted by the city was the 2022 edition published July 1, 2022.The California Health and Safety Code requires local governments to adopt the most current editions of the model codes related to construction.

The new 2025 California Building Standards Commission’s California Code of Regulations, Title 24 will become effective January 1, 2026 and are the minimum regulated codes adopted by the State of California for construction. All jurisdictions are required to adopt the updated codes in order to maintain local consistency with state requirements.

As a part of the code updates and revisions the city may adopt the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) and the 2024 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (ISPSC).

The IPMC is a model code that regulates the minimum maintenance requirements for existing buildings. It is a document intended to establish minimum maintenance standards for basic equipment, light, ventilation, heating, sanitation and fire safety. The ISPSC is a model code that establishes minimum requirements for the design, construction, alteration, repair and maintenance of swimming pools, spas, hot tubs and aquatic facilities.

These 2022 California codes to be updated and added are as follows:

Part 1 California Administrative Code; Part 2 California Building Code Volumes 1 and 2; Part

2.5 California Residential Code; Part 3 California Electrical Code; Part 4 California Mechanical Code; Part 5 California Plumbing Code; Part 6 California Energy Code; Part 7 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code; Part 8 California Historical Building Code; Part 9 California Fire Code; Part 10 California Existing Building Code; Part 11 California Green Building Standards Code; Part 12 California Referenced Standards Code; The 2024 International Property Maintenance Code; and the 2024 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code.

ANALYSIS:

The 2025 edition of California Building Standards Commission’s (CBSC), California Code of Regulations, Title 24 (CCR) are the standards for construction. These codes are adopted by the State from the 2024 International Code Council’s model codes and will go in to effect January 1, 2026. The 2024 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) are standards for property maintenance code compliance, and the 2024 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (ISPSC) are the standards for the construction and maintenance of pools, spas, hot tubs, and aquatic facilities. The IMPC and the ISPSC have provisions that the California Building Standards Code do not have.

Government Code Section 50022.3 establishes the following procedure for adopting another code by reference, which is different from the City’s usual procedure. At the first meeting, Council is to consider, introduce and waive first reading of the ordinance after holding a public hearing; the public hearing is not noticed. At a second meeting, a noticed public hearing is held to adopt the ordinance. Notice of this public hearing must be published twice in a local newspaper at least 14 days before the public hearing. The City Council may adopt the 206
ordinance at the conclusion of the public hearing. Staff is recommending the public hearing be noticed and set for November 5, 2025
STRATEGIC PLAN:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACTS:

There is no fiscal impact.

OPTIONS:

As an alternative to Staff's recommendation, the City Council may:

Reject Staff’s recommendation. Doing so, however, would result in the city code misaligning with the 2025 edition of California Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24), the 2024 International Property Maintenance Code, and 2024 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code for the City of Santa Paula Building and Safety Division, resulting in non-compliance with current building code development, and health and safety standards set by state law.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A - Building Codes Adoption Ordinance
207
ORDINANCE NO. 1349

EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24) INCLUDING THE 2025 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; VOLUMES 1 AND 2 OF THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL

CODE, INCLUDING APPENDICES AH PATIO COVERS, AJ EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, AX SWIMMING POOL SAFETY ACT; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA
MECHANICAL CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA
REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; THE 2024 INTERNATIONAL
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE; AND THE 2024 INTERNATIONAL

SWIMMING POOL AND SPA CODE
The City Council of the City of Santa Paula ordains as follows:

SECTION 1. RECITALS.

A. California Government Code Sections 50022.1 et seq. authorizes the City of Santa Paula (“City") to adopt by reference the California Building Standards Code, 2025 edition (California Code of Regulations Title 24,), including certain uniform codes including the 2025 California Administrative Code, the 2025 California Building Code, the 2025 California Residential Code, including Appendices AH Patio Covers, AJ Existing Buildings and Structures, AX Swimming Pool Safety Act, the 2025 California Electrical Code, the 2025 California Mechanical Code, the 2025 California Plumbing Code, the 2025 California Energy Code, the 2025 California Wildlife-Urban Interface Code; the 2025 California Historical Building Code, the 2025 California Existing Building Code, the 2025 California Green Building Standards Code, the 2025 California Referenced Standards Code, as well as the 2024 International Property Maintenance Code, and the 2024 International Swimming Pool And Spa Code.

B. The City Council previously adopted the 2022 edition of the California Building Standards Code as adopted by the State of California Building Standards 208
Commission in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

C. The City now desires to adopt the provisions of the 2025 California Building Standards Code.

D. The City Council previously adopted the 2021 edition of the International Property Maintenance Code as published by the International Code Council.

E. The City now desires to adopt the provisions of the 2024 International Property Maintenance Code as published by the International Code Council.

F. The City now desires to adopt the provisions of the 2024 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code as published by the International Code Council.

G. The City held a public hearing on November 5, 2025, at which time all interested persons had the opportunity to appear and be heard on the matter of adopting the California Building Standards Commission, California Code of Regulations as amended herein.

H. The City published notice of the aforementioned public hearing pursuant to California Government Code Section 6066.

I. Any and all other legal prerequisites relating to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred.

SECTION 2: Sections 150.001, 150.015, and 150.025 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows (where stricken text indicates deletions and underlined text indicates additions):
“CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
§ 150.001 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 1 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Administrative Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference. This section will not be applicable to §§ 150.035 and 150.036, Chapter 151, and Chapter 16.106."

CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
§ 150.015 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 2 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Building Code, as published by the CaliforniaBuildingStandards Commission, isherebyadoptedbyreference.

CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
§ 150.025 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. 209
Pursuant to Cal. Gov't Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 5 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Plumbing Code, as published by the CaliforniaBuildingStandards Commission, isherebyadoptedbyreference.” SECTION 3: Sections 150.040, 150.045, 150.055, 150.075, and 150.085 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows (where stricken text indicates deletions and underlined text indicates additions):
“INTERNATIONAL URBAN-WILDLAND INTERFACE CODE
§ 150.040 ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

That certain code known as the International Urban-Wildland Interface Code 2012 Edition is adopted by reference.

CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
§ 150.045 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov't code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 3 of the California Codeof Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Electrical Code, as published by the CaliforniaBuildingStandardsCommission, isherebyadoptedbyreference.

CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
§ 150.055 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 4 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Mechanical Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.

CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE
§ 150.075 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov't Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 2.5 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Residential Code including Appendices AH Patio Covers, AJ Existing Buildings and Structures, and AX Swimming Pool Safety Act, aspublished by the California Building Standards Commission, ishereby adopted by reference. 210
“§ 150.075 California Residential Code Table R301.2 Added & Revised by filling the table values as follows:

TABLE R301.2 CLIMATIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DESIGN CRITERIA
MEAN
ANNUAL
TEMP.

61.8 O
F

16.6 O
C

MANUAL J DESIGN CRITERIA
Heating temperature
difference
36 oF
(2.2
oC)
Cooling temperature
difference
6 oF
(-14.4
oC)
AIR

FREEZING
INDEX
NONE
FLOOD

HAZARDS
May 2025
Outdoor winter design dry- bulb temperature
34 oF
(1.11
oC)
Outdoor Summer design
dry-bulb temperature
1% dry-bulb
≈ 80.6
oF
(27
oC)

ICE BARRIER

UNDERLAY
MENT

REQUIRED
NO

SUBJECT TO DAM

AGE FROM

TERMITE
VERY
HEAVY
Indoor winter design dry-bulb temperature
70 oF
(21.11
oC)
Indoor Summer design dry-bulb temperature
75 oF
(23.9
oC)
FROST
LINE
DEPTH
>12”

WEATHERING

NEGLIGIBLE

SEISMIC
DESIGN CAT.

D2 OR E
Indoor winter
design dry- bulb
temperature
70 oF
(21.11
oC)
Indoor
Summer
design
relative
humidity
50% RH
211

WIND DESIGN

WINDBORNE

DEBRIS ZONE
NO
Coincident
wet bulb
67 oF (19.44
oC)
Indoor
Summer
design
relative
humidity
50% RH

SPECIAL
WIND
REGION
NO
Altitude
correction
factor
+0.08 in
Hg
Daily
Range
Light
variation
16-21 oF
TOPOGR
APHIC

EFFECTS
NO
Elevation
279 ft (85 m)
Latitude
34o 21’12.6” N
SPEED
(MPH)
110

GROUND SNOW
LOAD
ZERO
212

CALIFORNIA GREEN STANDARDS CODE
§ 150.085 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 11 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Green Building Standards Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.”
SECTION 4: Sections 150.150, 150.160, 150.170, 150.180, and 150.190 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows (where stricken text indicates deletions and underlined text indicates additions):

INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
§150.150 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov't Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., that certain code known as the International Property Maintenance Code, 2021 2024 Edition, published by the International Code Council, is hereby adopted by reference.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
§ 150.160 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov't Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Energy Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.

CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE
§ 150.170 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 12 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Referenced Standards Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.

CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE
§ 150.180 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE ADOPTED BY
REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 10 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Existing Building Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.
213

CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE
§ 150.190 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 8 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2022 2025 California Historical Building Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.”
SECTION 5: Sections 150.200 and 150.210 of Chapter 150 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code are hereby added to read as follows:
“CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE-URBAN INTERFACE CODE
§ 150.200 CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., Title 24, Part 7 of the California Code of Regulations, namely the 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, as published by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference.

INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING POOL AND SPA CODE
§ 150.210 INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING POOL AND SPA CODE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

Pursuant to Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., that certain code known as the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, 2024 edition, published by the International Code Council, is hereby adopted by reference.” SECTION 6: All references to the Administrative, Building, Residential, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Energy, Historical Building, Existing Building, Green Building Standards, Wildland-Urban Interface, and Referenced Standards Codes, as well as the International Property Maintenance Code and the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, and/or the Santa Paula Code by that name in the Santa Paula Municipal Code, City forms, City documents, or City regulations shall be construed to refer to the codes adopted herein and as amended hereinafter.

SECTION 7: One(1)complete copyof each oftheseSantaPaula codes,including all of the codes adopted by reference, shallbe maintained in the office of theBuilding Official and available for public review.

SECTION 8: In the event thereare conflicts between theprovisions of these codes and other codes orprovisions adoptedby theCity, themostrestrictive provision shallapply.

SECTION 9: Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances. All prior ordinances or parts conflictingorinconsistentwiththeprovisionsofthisordinancearehereby repealed 214
SECTION 10: Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase added by this ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, orphrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

SECTION 11: Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published at least five (5) days prior to the meetingatwhich theproposed ordinance istobeadopted and shallpost a certified copy of the proposed ordinance in the office of the City Clerk, and with fifteen (15) days of its adoption, shall cause a summary of it to be published, including the vote for and against thesame,andshallpostacertified copyoftheadoptedordinance intheOfficeOf the City Clerk, in accordance with California Government Code Section 36933.

SECTION 12: Effective Date. This ordinance and the rules, regulations, provisions, requirements, orders andmatters established and adopted hereby shall take effect and be in full force and effect on January 1, 2026, which is to be no less than thirty (30) days from and after the date of its final passage and adoption.

SECTION 13: CEQA. The City Council finds that this ordinance is not a project within the meaning of section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines because it has no potential to cause direct or indirect physical changes to the environment. Alternatively, the ordinance is also exempt from California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA guidelines because.it can be seen with certainty that adoption of this ordinance will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The codes adopted herein are dictated by the California Buildings Standards Code and are their adoption by reference is purely administrative. Staff is directed to file a notice of exemption within five (5) days of the adoption of this ordinance.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Paula, California on the 5th day of November, 2025.

Pedro Chavez, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
215
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Monica Castillo, City Attorney
216

CITY OFSANTA PAULA )
COUNTYOFVENTURA ) §

STATEOFCALIFORNIA )
I, Julie Latshaw, City Clerk of the City of Santa Paula, California, do hereby certify thattheforegoingordinance No. 1349 wasintroduced andgivenfirst reading on the 15th day of October 2025 upon the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
and was PASSED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING on the 5 th day of
November 2025 upon the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Julie Latshaw, City Clerk
217
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: James Mason, Community & Economic Development Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION

FOR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MOBILE HOME

RENT COMMISSION
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 12.C

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 7591 and Resolution No. 7594 approving the compensation structure for the Mobile Home Rent Review Commission and the Planning Commission.

Presented by: James Mason, Community & Economic Development Director BACKGROUND:

The City of Santa Paula established the Mobile Home Rent Review Commission (MHRRC) to implement and oversee the City’s Mobile Home Rent Stabilization Ordinance.

The Commission is charged with conducting hearings, reviewing applications for rent adjustments, and making determinations to ensure a fair balance between park owners and residents.

Currently, members of the MHRRC contribute specialized backgrounds and expertise valuable to the complexities of their role on the committee. Their role often requires several hours preparing for and participating in hearings, which can be complex and require careful consideration of legal, financial, and housing issues.

Santa Paula Municipal Code section 152.06(A)(4) states: "Commission members and their alternates shall be compensated for their services in an amount established by resolution of the City Council and may receive reimbursement as provided by the City Council for traveling and other expenses incurred while on official duty."
The City currently provides a $50 stipend to the Planning Commissioners for each meeting, however staff was unable to locate any Resolution establishing a stipend for MHRRC members. It is possible a Resolution was not adopted by the City Council and as such, a compensation amount and structure has not been defined for the Mobile Home Rent Review 218
Commission.

ANALYSIS:

On September 17, 2025, City Staff presented an item to the City Council seeking direction regarding the establishment of compensation for members of the City’s commissions, specifically Planning Commission and the Mobile Home Rent Review Commission. Following discussion, the City Council directed Staff to prepare and return with two separate Resolutions —one pertaining to the Planning Commission and another for the Mobile Home Rent Review Commission. The Council further directed that each Resolution establish a commissioner stipend of up to $100 per meeting.

Accordingly, Staff and the City Attorney' s Office have prepared two resolutions that would compensate commissioners of both bodies $100 per meeting attended. Upon conclusion of discussion, if the Council feels that it is in order to compensate commissioners in the manner previously discussed, it would be appropriate for the Council to adopt the resolutions attached to the Staff Report.

Annual costs for compensation of the Mobile Home Rent Review Commission will be dependent on the number of applications submitted, community demands related to mobile home rent stabilization and changes to state legislation. The Commission has met approximately 8 times since 2015. Given the infrequency of meetings, if approved by City Council, compensation would be most efficient if provided on a per-meeting basis as already provided for Planning Commissioners. As an example, a stipend of $100 per meeting, with three members attending four meetings per year, would have an annual cost of approximately $1200.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

None.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

The estimated annual cost for the Planning Commission will be:
($100 x 5 Commissioners) 10 meetings = $5,000
The estimated annual cost for the Mobile Home Rent Review Commission will be:
($100 x 3 Commissioners) 3 meetings = $900
Funding for the the two year budget will come from salary savings in the Community & Economic Development Department Budget.

Staff will present a budget adjustment, within the City Manager's authority.

OPTIONS:

As an alternative to Staff's recommendation, the CIty Council may:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 7591 and Resolution No. 7594 with amendments to the compensation structure for the Mobile Home Rent Review Commission and the Planning Commission.

2. Do not approve proposed resolutions regarding commissioner compensation and provide staff with direction.
219
ATTACHMENTS:

ATTACHMENT_A.__Resolution_No._7591_MHRRC_Compensation-c1.docx Attachment_B_Resolution_PC_Compensation_2_ (2)-c1.docx
220

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 7591
Mobile Home Rent Review Committee
Compensation
221
RESOLUTION NO. 7591

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA

ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION FOR MEMBERS OF THE MOBILE HOME RENT

REVIEW COMMISSION
The City Council of the City of Santa Paula resolves as follows SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. The City of Santa Paula established a Mobile Home Rent Review Commission (“Commission”) in June 1984 to implement and oversee the City’s Mobile Home Rent Stabilization Ordinance.

B. Commission members bring specialized backgrounds and expertise valuable to the complexities of their roles on the Commission, which often require several hours preparing for and participating in hearings that can be complex and require careful consideration of legal, financial, and housing issues.

C. The City Council desires to recognize this commitment and encourage continued participation by establishing a stipend for Commission members.

D. Santa Paula Municipal Code section 152.06(A)(4) states: "Commission members and their alternates shall be compensated for their services in an amount established by resolution of the City Council and may receive reimbursement as provided by the City Council for traveling and other expenses incurred while on official duty."
E. The City Council finds that establishing a reasonable stipend is in the public interest and consistent with practices in other California jurisdictions.

SECTION 2: Compensation Established. Members of the Mobile Home Rent Review Commission and their alternates shall receive compensation in the amount of one Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each regular or special meeting attended.

SECTION 3: Eligibility. Compensation shall only be provided to duly appointed members in attendance at a meeting. Alternate members shall be compensated only when serving in place of a regular member.

SECTION 4: Expense Reimbursement. Members shall also be entitled to reimbursement of actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties, consistent with City policy.

SECTION 5: Budget Appropriation. The Community Development Department is directed to incorporate this expenditure into its annual operating budget.

SECTION 6: Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
222
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santa Paula this 15th day of October, 2025.
_____________________
Pedro Chavez, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Julie Latshaw, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Monica Castillo, City Attorney
223

ATTACHMENT B
RESOLUTION NO. 7594
Planning Commission
Compensation
224
RESOLUTION NO. 7594

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA

ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION FOR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION
The City Council of the City of Santa Paula resolves as follows SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. The City of Santa Paula established a Planning Commission (“Commission”) that receives applications for discretionary projects, such as Planned Development (PD) permits, Conditional Use Permits (CUP), and variances, and conducts public hearings on land use-related matters.

B. Commission members contribute specialized backgrounds and expertise valuable to the complexities of their roles on the Commission, and their roles often require several hours preparing for and participating in hearings, which can be complex and require careful consideration of legal, financial, and housing issues.

C. The City Council desires to recognize this commitment and encourage continued participation by establishing a stipend for Commission members.

D. The current compensation for the Planning Commission is $50 per meeting.

E. Santa Paula Municipal Code Section 12.02 states: “The City Council may, by resolution, determine whether, and in what amount, compensation will be provided for members of the [commissions] established by this division. Without a City Council resolution establishing compensation, it shall be conclusively presumed that no compensation is to be provided.”
F. The City Council finds that increasing Commission members’ compensation is in the public interest because it incentivizes continued participation from current and future members.

SECTION 2: Compensation Established. Members of the Planning Commission shall receive compensation in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each regular or special meeting attended.

SECTION 4: Expense Reimbursement. Members shall also be entitled to reimbursement of actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties, consistent with City policy.
225
SECTION 5: Budget Appropriation. The Community Development Department is directed to incorporate this expenditure into its annual operating budget.

SECTION 6: Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santa Paula, this 15th day of October, 2025.
_____________________
Pedro Chavez, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Julie Latshaw, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Monica Castillo, City Attorney
226
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Dan Singer, City Manager
Subject: FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Date: October 15, 2025
Agenda Item: 13.A

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council review future agenda items.

BACKGROUND:

The attached Future Agenda Items forecast identifies anticipated agenda items for upcoming Council meetings as well as Study Session topics and long-range discussion items. Placing this forecast on the agenda affords the Council and the public the opportunity to discuss such topics and to make any recommendations. It should be noted this is only a forecast and may change over the course of time or based on feedback by the Mayor and City Manager during review of future agendas.

ANALYSIS:

Should a member of the City Council wish to introduce a future agenda topic, it should be done in compliance with the Council's adopted Manual of Procedural Guidelines, Section 5.1.

Items introduced by a member of the Council during a Council meeting requires a second and should be reserved for time-sensitive matters needing attention within the proceeding 45 day period.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

FISCAL IMPACTS:

OPTIONS:

ATTACHMENTS:

10.15.2025 Future Agenda Items lm.docx
227
Santa Paula City Council Tentative Agenda Schedule
Updated 10/15/25
Activities associated with the Council’s Strategic Plan* Regular Meeting
November 5 - 6:30pm
P&R Holiday Parade Request
PW Plans & Specifications for 8th Street Streetlight Repair Project PW EV Fast Charger Installation & Maintenance Agreement Finance Year End & First Qtr. Financial Report
Finance Measure T Audit
PD Police Department Report
Regular Meeting
November 19 - 6:30pm
Admin City Managers Department Report
Admin Harvest CFD
CDD Spirit MOU
PD COPS Law Enforcement

STUDY SESSION TOPICS
Admin No Smoking Ordinance 3
rd Qtr.

Finance Development Impact Fees (DIF)* 3
rd Qtr.

Admin Municipal Code Update – Joint with Planning Commission* Ongoing CDD Use of Triangle Property on Housing TBD

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
P&R Fireworks Funding Oct/Nov
PW 5-Year Pavement Management Plan – Cycle 2 Nov
CDD Central Business District Live Entertainment Ord 1339 TBD Legal Fire MOU Amendment for Station 26 TBD
CDD Downtown Vacancies Options* TBD
CDD Downtown Parking Inventory and Options* TBD
PW Water & Sewer Rate Study TBD
CDD Animal Shelter Agreement TBD
CDD Athens Rate Adjustment Request TBD
228

Santa Paula City CouncilOctober 15, 2025

Santa Paula City Council
October 15, 2025