Agenda Item #15.2
For Council Meeting of: January 25, 2022
CITY OF SANTA ROSA
CITY COUNCIL
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: SUE GALLAGHER, CITY ATTORNEY
STEPHANIE WILLIAMS, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING – REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS (FAIR MAPS ACT) – SECOND OF FOUR PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ACTION: PUBLIC HEARING
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the City Attorney and City Clerk that the Council hold a public hearing to receive input from the community regarding the composition of voting districts for the district-based election of Council members, in accordance with Elections Code section 21627.1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On December 7, 2021, the Council held the first of four public hearings in the process for the decennial review of City Council Member district boundaries. Cities with district-based elections are required to update (“redistrict”) the district boundaries every ten years, following the receipt of updated population data from each federal decennial census. Santa Rosa is required to redistrict the Council district boundaries prior to the next City Council election in 2022.
The Fair and Inclusive Redistricting for Municipalities and Political Subdivisions (FAIR MAPS) Act requires cities and counties to engage communities in the redistricting process. The process must include at least four public hearings, one of which may be conducted as a community workshop. This will be the second of those four public forums.
BACKGROUND
On October 12, 2021, the Council held a study session at which it reviewed the process and standards for the redistricting of City Council member districts under the California Voting Rights Act and the Fair and Inclusive Redistricting for Municipalities and Political Subdivisions (FAIR MAPS) Act.
Pursuant to Elections Code section 21627.1, of the FAIR MAPS Act, the City Council is required to hold four public hearings in connection with the redistricting of electoral districts for City Council. One of those hearings may be held as a community workshop.
Pursuant to Elections Code section 21627.1, one of the four required public hearings must be held before any map or maps of the boundaries of the updated voting districts are drawn. The Council held this initial public hearing on December 7, 2021. The hearing provided the public an opportunity to provide input regarding preferences and criteria for the composition of the revised districts.
The Council is now holding the second of the four required public hearings. At this second public hearing, initial draft maps will be presented for discussion. The draft maps may be prepared by staff, by the City’s consultants or by members of the public.
An on-line public mapping program has been placed on the City’s website, open and available to all. By using that system or by submitting hard copy maps, any member of the public may propose new or revised Council district boundaries. This second hearing will provide the public an opportunity to begin to react to, and provide input on specific proposed Council boundaries.
PRIOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
October 12, 2021, Council study session to discuss the redistricting process.
December 7, 2021, First Public Hearing to receive community input.
ANALYSIS
This is the second of a series of four public hearings to be held by the City under Elections Code section 21627.1. The purpose of this public hearing is to further inform the public about the redistricting process, to hear from residents on factors they believe should be taken into consideration when creating the updated Council districts, and to hear public response to specific map proposals.
As we head into this second hearing, it is helpful to keep in mind that state and federal law set forth certain standards and criteria for redistricting. These include:
Council districts shall be substantially equal in population.
The redistricting plan must comply with the U.S. and California Constitutions, the Federal Voting Rights Act and state law.
To the extent practicable, districts shall be geographically contiguous.
To the extent practicable, the integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest shall be respected.
District boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents.
To the extent practicable, districts should be drawn to encourage geographical compactness.
District lines must not be drawn for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party.
The community is encouraged to provide input on some or all of these factors, and on any and all proposed maps. With this public hearing, the process of redistricting moves into the mapping stage. .
The next steps include the continued availability of the mapping program on the City’s website, continued public outreach and engagement, and two final public forums, including a Community Workshop in February and a Council hearing at the beginning of March. A full schedule of the redistricting process is set forth in Attachment 1. .
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.
BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Not applicable.
NOTIFICATION
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 - Timeline for Redistricting Process
Attachment 2 – Draft Map A
Attachment 3 – Draft Map A with Existing District Lines Attachment 4 – Draft Map B
Attachment 5 – Draft Map B with Existing District Lines Attachment 6 – Draft Map C
Attachment 7 – Draft Map C with Existing District Lines
CONTACT
Sue Gallagher, City Attorney, 707-543-3040
REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS (FAIR MAPS ACT) PAGE 6 OF 7