Cities Index.
Attachment 3 - Let’s Connect Survey Summary Report

Santa Rosa City Council
July 12, 2022

Document
Attachment 3 - Let’s Connect Survey Summary Report
Meeting
July 12, 2022
Body
Santa Rosa City Council
Original file
1.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Public Safety and Violence
Prevention Funding Survey

SURVEY RESPONSE REPORT
03 June 2021 - 29 June 2022
PROJECT NAME:

Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Measure (Measure O) ATTACHMENT 3

REGISTRATION QUESTIONS
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
1 of
18 Q1

In which decade were you born?
1 (0.7%)
1 (0.7%)
8 (5.4%)
8 (5.4%)
19 (12.8%)
19 (12.8%)
23 (15.5%)
23 (15.5%)
28 (18.9%)
28 (18.9%)
42 (28.4%)
42 (28.4%)
23 (15.5%)
23 (15.5%)
4 (2.7%)
4 (2.7%)
2000 or later 1990-1999 1980-1989 1970-1979 1960-1969 1950-1959 1940-1949 before 1940 Question options
Mandatory Question
(148 response(s))
Question type:

Dropdown Question
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
2 of
18 Q2

What is your gender?
69 (46.6%)
69 (46.6%)
62 (41.9%)
62 (41.9%)
3 (2.0%)
3 (2.0%)
14 (9.5%)
14 (9.5%)
Female Male Another gender identity Prefer not to answer Question options
Mandatory Question
(148 response(s))
Question type:

Dropdown Question
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
3 of
18 Q3

What is your race or ethnicity?
American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish Origin White Another race/ethnicity Prefer not to answer Middle Eastern or North African Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Question options
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
120
5 7
2 5
109
4 23
Mandatory Question
(148 response(s))
Question type:

Checkbox Question
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
4 of
18 Q4

What is your council district?
10 (6.9%)
10 (6.9%)
25 (17.2%)
25 (17.2%)
35 (24.1%)
35 (24.1%)
27 (18.6%)
27 (18.6%)
18 (12.4%)
18 (12.4%)
18 (12.4%)
18 (12.4%)
12 (8.3%)
12 (8.3%)
District 1 - Alvarez District 2 -Sawyer District 3 - MacDonald District 4 - Fleming District 5 - C Rogers District 6 - Schwedhelm District 7 - N Rogers Question options
Optional question
(145 response(s), 3 skipped)
Question type:

Dropdown Question
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
5 of
18 SURVEY QUESTIONS
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
6 of
18 Q1

How would you rate the job that Santa Rosa is doing in providing public safety services (Police and Fire Programs) on a sca...
15 (10.2%)
15 (10.2%)
33 (22.4%)
33 (22.4%)
20 (13.6%)
20 (13.6%)
66 (44.9%)
66 (44.9%)
13 (8.8%)
13 (8.8%)
1 - Poor 2 - Fair 3 - Neither good nor bad 4 - Good 5 - Excellent Question options
Optional question
(147 response(s), 1 skipped)
Question type:

Dropdown Question
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
7 of
18 Q2

How would you rate the need for additional funding for public safety services (Police and Fire Programs) in Santa Rosa on a scale from 1 to 5 (where 1 is no need and 5 is much need)? 27 (18.4%)
27 (18.4%)
6 (4.1%)
6 (4.1%)
38 (25.9%)
38 (25.9%)
40 (27.2%)
40 (27.2%)
36 (24.5%)
36 (24.5%)
1 - No need for additional funding 2 - Little need for additional funding 3 - Unsure, need more information 4 - Need for additional funding 5 - Very much need for additional funding Question options
Optional question
(147 response(s), 1 skipped)
Question type:

Dropdown Question
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
8 of
18 Q3

How would you rate the job that Santa Rosa is doing in providing violence prevention programs on a scale from 1 to 5 (where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent)? 31 (21.5%)
31 (21.5%)
30 (20.8%)
30 (20.8%)
41 (28.5%)
41 (28.5%)
38 (26.4%)
38 (26.4%)
4 (2.8%)
4 (2.8%)
1 - Poor 2 - Fair 3 - Neither good nor bad 4 - Good 5 - Excellent Question options
Optional question
(144 response(s), 4 skipped)
Question type:

Dropdown Question
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
9 of
18 Q4

How would you rate the need for additional funding for violence prevention programs in Santa Rosa on a scale from 1 to 5 (where 1 is no need and 5 is much need)? 28 (19.2%)
28 (19.2%)
10 (6.8%)
10 (6.8%)
39 (26.7%)
39 (26.7%)
35 (24.0%)
35 (24.0%)
34 (23.3%)
34 (23.3%)
1 - No need for additional funding 2 - Little need for additional funding 3 - Unsure, need more information 4 - Need for additional funding 5 - Very much need for additional funding Question options
Optional question
(146 response(s), 2 skipped)
Question type:

Dropdown Question
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
10 of
18 Q5

Please rate the importance of the following public safety priorities:

Low Priority
Medium Priority
High Priority
Question options
25 50
75 100
125
150
175
Reduce the risk of
wildfires by improving
wil...

Maintain fire protection
services and prevent...

Maintain rapid 9-1-1
emergency response
Provide resources for
youth programs and
viol...

Prevent reductions in
the number of on-duty
f...
• Provide mental health
counseling, wrap arou...
118
118
114
87 95
106
27 24
29 40
32 20
2 5
5 21
18 19
Optional question
(148 response(s), 0 skipped)
Question type:

Likert Question
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
11 of
18 Q5

Please rate the importance of the following public safety priorities:

High Priority : 118
Medium Priority : 27
Low Priority : 2
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
120
130
Reduce the risk of wildfires by improving wildfire prevention, preparedness, early fire alert systems, rapid response, and evacuation planning
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
12 of
18 Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey : Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
13 of
18 High Priority : 118
Medium Priority : 24
Low Priority : 5
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
120
130
Maintain fire protection services and prevent the closure of fire stations Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
14 of
18 High Priority : 114
Medium Priority : 29
Low Priority : 5
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
120
Maintain rapid 9-1-1 emergency response
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
15 of
18 High Priority : 87
Medium Priority : 40
Low Priority : 21
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
Provide resources for youth programs and violence prevention efforts along with grants to community-based organizations
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
16 of
18 High Priority : 95
Medium Priority : 32
Low Priority : 18
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
Prevent reductions in the number of on-duty firefighters, paramedics and police officers
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
17 of
18 High Priority : 106
Medium Priority : 20
Low Priority : 19
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
120
• Provide mental health counseling, wrap around services and programs that support at-risk youth and their families
Public Safety and Violence Prevention Funding Survey
: Survey Report for
03 June 2021
to
29 June 2022
Page
18 of
18

← All documents from this meeting