To: Mayor
and Santa Rosa City Council Members,
From: James L Duncan
Re: Closed Session Item 3.3, Santa Rosa City Council Meeting, March 26, 2024, California Public Utilities Commission Proceeding A.15-05-014, extension of the approval of the Jennings Avenue pedestrian and bicycle crossing of the SMART tracks.
Date: March 25, 2024
I hope the
following will assist the Council in extending the CPUC Jennings Crossing approval so as to build and reopen the crossing:
• The at-grade rail crossing at Jennings Avenue is not a new crossing – it was first approved by the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors 119 years ago in 19041. See attachments, pp. 2, 3, 4. • The Jennings Crossing was CPUC crossing #5-55.0 for the first 57 years. In 1961 Sonoma County agreed to the Southern Pacific Railroad Co.’s demand that the Jennings Crossing be closed when the then new Guerneville Road rail crossing was opened. See attachment p. 5. • Although the Jennings Crossing was closed to
motor vehicle traffic it remained open to
pedestrian and bicycle traffic for the next 54 years. See attachments pp. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. • While Santa Rosa’s CPUC Application, A.15-05-014, for approval of the Jennings Crossing was still pending in 2015 the CPUC ordered the crossing closed with a fence as a temporary safety measure u
ntil the Application was decided. See attachments pp. 11, 12, 13. • The upcoming development of the
large vacant property located at Lance Drive and
Guerneville Road with a possible 800 units will
increase the traffic at the Guerneville Road rail
crossing. See attachment
s pp. 13-26.
• The Federal Railroad Administration’s Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Accident Prediction System ranks the Guerneville Road rail crossing as one of SMART’s crossings most likely to be the site of future accidents. S
ee attachment p. 30 of pp. 27-32.
The Jenni
ngs Crossing has been in public use for 111 years of the last 119 years. If SMART had honored its commitment that its contractors would build the CPUC approved Jennings Crossing improvements with Santa Rosa paying the costs the crossing would have been reopened in 2017.
But SMART has not acted honorably and the crossing remains closed to this day.
The Jenni
ngs Crossing of the SMART tracks is the vital connection between the east and west sides of the Jennings Avenue neighborhood. With the upcoming development of the large property at Lance Drive and Guerneville Road, the Jennings Crossing will also provide an essential additional transportation route which will moderate the increased traffic at the Guerneville Road crossing, already known as one of the more hazardous crossings on the SMART rail line.
Previous
City Councils resolved that a way should be found to build and reopen the CPUC approved Jennings Crossing - with or without SMART. This City Council is urged to continue in that resolve.
James L. Du
ncan
[email protected]
1 Jennings Avenue was not annexed into the City of Santa Rosa until a later date. 1 � .. \ ,:;. "/" \ ,z,1
(.
\ · 7 t.ti•
\ \ s.A1fi• \ ,!J. -\
�
\5 /1· i
\
-.\
IJJ.A- \
\ \
6 \
1 \\
j.O
�\.
i9
\ �o
5. /3 JI.
�
�
4-. i6JI-Oj.
�
fJ.OJfl•
�
In IA'e Room$ r.r"Me Board or8t1pern60r.s 2 ss
t1f 0/J/IIJl;IA CQVNTY, 17TATE <7/ CA�/,«:17,iW/A)
••
7171� 16 -fiJee,lffy tliat Ille LhAJFo cJT
�V,PE,f'�.SQ,1"$ o/ $e CQt1H7Rt?f�HQma,, ObTe ur
Cal1f1Jr11ia, clta' on /ff/$ htrday of' Oc.fo&��
l.5IOI/.) .by re.,o/4,llan l'�c.1/ar/y 17as.stUI' qna/ enten-c/ ;,, 'I/Je m1nut'e� or6cr/d' ihA,rLJ., .acce,e:it-JENN/N66Al'eM as c1�finc1Tet:/ v�on �1; Af,f� 7t:lroncl. on Jello//-o� lit, Jltl.h1c..) qnt:/ c/edta:tle �e Some fQ pulkc v.se.
W!lhe� mr /,and anr,,t; 5�al ()j-�P/� ,8gg,rp(
Aire.if JZN, v:10/. I It t
c-f-�� / /. .· C/1,l/lfM�N. Q..,,-_._ /7'7 , -X . / �L.,. •' 0-... •• , ....... _ "7 /> �. c.,,,/�rn . i6 1&
�1
f.o�fl- (().
s. 1;0.II- '
.J,S6 J-96
I
2 Loading CityCache map data...
1942 2018
1942 0 200 400ft
Tools
County
Search...City of Santa Rosa
Aerial Viewer
JENNINGS AVENUE RAIL CROSSING - 1942
https://maps.srcity.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?
viewer=AerialViewer&Center=6375999,1920000
3 Figure /g36-1
\\ghdnet\ghd\US\Santa Rosa\Projects\11837 - Santa Cruz Sanitation District\11837-8410848 Davenport Recycled Water Study\08-GIS\Maps\Figures\Feasibility Study\Regional Map PD v2.mxd Job Number
Revision
8410868
A
Date 2/g19/g3/g45/g68/g81/g3201/g24
o
City of Santa Rosa
Jennings Avenue /g51/g72/g71/g72/g86/g87/g85/g76/g68/g81/g3/g68/g81/g71/g3/g37/g76/g70/g92/g70/g79/g72/g3 /g53/g68/g76/g79/g3Crossing EIR /g36/g72/g85/g76/g68/g79/g3/g51/g75/g82/g87/g82/g74/g85/g68/g83/g75/g3/g16/g3/g20/g28/g24/g25 2235 Mercury Way, Santa Rosa, CA T 707-523-1010 F 707-527-8679 W www.ghd.com /g36/g72/g85/g76/g68/g79/g3/g83/g75/g82/g87/g82/g74/g85/g68/g83/g75/g3/g82/g73/g3/g45/g72/g81/g81/g76/g81/g74/g86/g3/g36/g89/g72/g81/g88/g72/g3/g85/g68/g76/g79/g3/g70/g85/g82/g86/g86/g76/g81/g74/g3/g73/g85/g82/g80/g3/g38/g76/g87/g92/g3/g68/g85/g70/g75/g76/g89/g72/g86/g3/g87/g68/g78/g72/g81/g3/g76/g81/g3/g20/g28/g24/g25/g17/g3/g55/g82/g3/g87/g75/g72/g3/g86/g82/g88/g87/g75/g3/g82/g73/g3/g45/g72/g81/g81/g76/g81/g74/g86/g3/g36/g89/g72/g81/g88/g72/g3/g76/g86/g3 /g68/g81/g3/g82/g79/g71/g3/g85/g68/g76/g79/g3/g92/g68/g85/g71/g3/g11/g87/g85/g76/g68/g81/g74/g88/g79/g68/g85/g3/g86/g72/g70/g87/g76/g82/g81/g12/g17 4 5
3/23/2019 Aerial Viewer - City of Santa Rosa
https://maps.srcity.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?viewer=AerialViewer&Center=6375999,1920000 1/1 Executing identify operation.
1942 2018
1963 0 500 1000ft
Tools
City Aeri…
I want to...
Search...City of Santa Rosa
Aerial Viewer
https://maps.srcity.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?
viewer=AerialViewer&Center=6375999,1920000
6 4/14/2019
0.01Miles0
600Scale 1:
JENNINGS AVENUE RAIL CROSSING - 1977
https://maps.srcity.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?
viewer=AerialViewer&Center=6375999,1920000
7 4/14/2019
0.01Miles0
600Scale 1:
JENNINGS AVENUE RAIL CROSSING - 1987
https://maps.srcity.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?
viewer=AerialViewer&Center=6375999,1920000
8 4/14/2019
0.02Miles0
1,200Scale 1:
JENNINGS AVENUE RAIL CROSSING - 2007
https://maps.srcity.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?
viewer=AerialViewer&Center=6375999,1920000
9 4/14/2019
0.01Miles0
600Scale 1:
JENNINGS AVENUE RAIL CROSSING - 2013
https://maps.srcity.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?
viewer=AerialViewer&Center=6375999,1920000
10 11
12 4/14/2019
0.01Miles0
600Scale 1:
JENNINGS AVENUE RAIL CROSSING - 2018
https://maps.srcity.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?
viewer=AerialViewer&Center=6375999,1920000
13 First look at housing plan
Northwest Santa Rosa » Proposal for huge project
that would add nearly 800 homes to be unveiled
before Design Review Board, public today
Nearly 800 new homes are planned on a former dairy farm in northwest Santa Rosa, representing one of the largest residential developments citywide in decades. Looking northeast, the Lance Drive apartment project site sits along Guerneville Road and Lance Drive in northwest Santa Rosa, Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024. (Chad Surmick / The Press Democrat)
14 BY PAULINA PINEDA THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
One of Santa Rosa’s largest housing projects in
decades would add nearly 800 homes on 35
acres in the city’s northwest corner, where a
developer has proposed a mix of market-rate
and affordable apartments and for-sale single-
family homes plus a nearly 5,000-square-foot
retail center.
The project off Guerneville Road and Lance
Drive envisions nearly as many units as
proposed at the former county hospital
complex across Highway 101. It is planned on
one of the last remaining vacant parcels of size in the city’s northwest.
The proposal is by Alameda-based Pacific Development, the company behind several large apartment projects in the Bay Area and redevelopment efforts at the Alameda marina.
The project will get its first public look before the Design Review Board at a special meeting 4:30 p.m. Thursday at Santa Rosa City Hall, 100 Santa Rosa Ave.
Residents can provide comments on the proposal in person, but no comments will be taken online.
The meeting will provide the board an opportunity to ask questions and provide feedback on the overall concept, layout and design but no formal action will be taken. The project will be reviewed by city staff and is eligible for a streamlined approval process outlined in city development code once the developer submits a formal planning application.
Backers say the project will add needed housing in the city’s northwest, touting the site’s proximity to the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit line, retail and dining at Coddington Shopping Center, and government and medical services. “We are excited to finally be developing this vacant property, which is within walking distance to the (Santa Rosa) North Station and adjacent to Hilliard Comstock Middle School,” said Sean Murphy, partner at Pacific Development. “This project will include family-focused market-rate and affordable apartments and for-sale homes, which are needed in Santa Rosa.”
Santa Rosa has about 70,000 existing homes, including apartments, granny units and mobile homes, and long-term plans call for adding as many as 24,000 new 15 homes by 2050.
A previous version of the plan, which was proposed by a different developer and presented to residents during a 2022 neighborhood meeting, was largely opposed by neighbors who are again raising questions about the scope of the development and its impact on traffic, public safety, water resources and noise.
Councilmember Chris Rogers, who represents the area in District 5, acknowledged residents’ concerns and said the city must meet future growth with continued investments in roads and other infrastructure to serve residents.
Still, he said there is great pressure on officials to prioritize housing development.
The city was experiencing a housing shortage before the 2017 Tubbs Fire destroyed thousands of homes — 5% of the city’s housing stock at the time — and the state has placed greater emphasis on housing construction in recent years, strengthening laws that penalize cities for not planning for sufficient housing to meet future needs.
“We need to continue to advance these projects, and that doesn’t mean we ignore the impacts on the community. We have to be thoughtful about our approach,” he said.
Murphy said the team has listened to residents’ feedback and incorporated it into the new plans.
The team anticipates starting construction in early 2025, and the project will be built in three phases.
The property remains unincorporated county land and is not within city limits, but developers plan to pursue annexation as the project goes through the development process, he said.
What’s planned
The property, once home to a dairy farm, is nestled between Northwest Community Park, Hilliard Comstock Middle School and neighborhoods dotted with single-family homes and condominiums.
The project calls for 672 one- to three-bedroom apartments spread across 25, three-story buildings that are connected by pedestrian walkways and green space.
One-hundred single-family homes in the center of the property would be built for sale, ranging in size from 1,600 square feet to 2,000 square feet. 16 A clubhouse with a fitness center, pool and outdoor seating is planned on the southeast portion of the property. Other amenities include a small co-working space, community kitchen, bike storage and pet washing station.
A second clubhouse with a fitness center and pool would be located in the northwest area of the property and playgrounds and grill areas are envisioned around the property. Residents will be able to access Comstock Middle School and the park through a new pedestrian crossing.
A 4,800-square-foot commercial building is planned on the eastern corner of the property at Guerneville Road and Lance Drive.
Neighbors fret project will a ect quality of life
In its updated 20-year general plan, the city has sought to prioritize infill development around neighborhood shopping centers, along key corridors and near transit.
The project first came to residents’ attention a few years ago.
The proposal, then being developed by Wood Partners, called for 792 units, 20 fewer units than under the current plan. Wood Partners is no longer involved in the project.
Residents, in letters sent to city planners ahead of the virtual August 2022 meeting and in comments made following the presentation, said the project would harm their quality of life.
Several residents said too many new apartments already were going up in the area and overcrowding would worsen existing traffic woes along Guerneville Road, a busy thoroughfare, and some of the surrounding arterial streets.
They worried the project would snarl traffic on Lance Drive, a narrow neighborhood road and one of the only streets connecting residents in the existing homes and apartments to Guerneville Road and further exacerbate congestion during peak hours.
That could be particularly dangerous during an emergency evacuation such as during the Tubbs Fire, residents said.
Others raised issues with the number of parking spaces being provided and said parking would spill out onto surrounding residential streets or parking lots without sufficient on-site parking. More than 1,500 parking spaces are planned, according to project plans.
17 The Westberry Condominium Owners’ Association, in a July 2022 letter sent to city planners, raised issues with the proposed density and layout of the project, likening it to a military base or public housing project that would be a blight on the neighborhood.
They questioned whether the existing street infrastructure was capable of handling increased traffic and worried overflow parking for new tenants would impact parking on their property.
One of the association’s board members suggested developers add new access points to the property to limit impact on Lance Drive and other neighborhood streets and make other adjustments to the layout.
Similar concerns were lodged against a 36-unit apartment project planned about a mile away on Steele Lane across from the Charles M. Schulz Museum, which along with the Children’s Museum of Sonoma County and Snoopy’s Home Ice unsuccessfully sought to appeal the project’s approval last August.
Murphy, the developer, said his team has incorporated residents’ feedback into the revised project plans.
Developers plan to add a new entrance to the property off Guerneville Road to help alleviate traffic on Lance Drive.
The project will add needed market-rate and affordable housing and prioritizes housing near the rail line and transit center at Coddingtown Mall, he said.
Rogers noted the project could qualify for significantly reduced parking under state law because it’s within a quarter-mile of major transit service, but the developer has acknowledged that’s unrealistic for a project of its size.
Rogers said concerns about density, congestion, safety and the impact on natural resources are often raised around infill projects, but the city has sought to plan for future growth through its general plan and specific plans.
Some of the projects going up across the city were approved years ago but are just getting off the ground after developers were able to secure financing. Developers may not break ground on some projects in the pipeline or planned for years if they weren’t able to secure financing when interest rates were low.
But the city needs to continue planning for future needs, said Rogers, who encouraged residents to be more involved in the land-use planning process to ensure issues are addressed before a project lands before city boards and commissions.
After Thursday’s Design Review Board meeting, the development team will make any necessary changes to the plan before submitting an application to the city, 18 which will be analyzed by city departments and the county for compliance with various development standards, including state environmental laws, said Santa Rosa Senior Planner Conor McKay.
The project, within the North Santa Rosa Station development area, can be approved through a streamlined process by the city’s zoning administrator, though city code allows the planning chief to require a more thorough review.
Plans for the single-family home lots require a minor conditional use permit and a subdivision map and those entitlements are reviewed by the Planning Commission.
You can reach Staff Writer Paulina Pineda at 707-521-5268 or [email protected]. On X (Twitter) @paulinapineda22. 19 Exterior renderings for Lance Drive apartments project in Santa Rosa. (courtesy LPAS)
20 Exterior renderings for Lance Drive apartments project in Santa Rosa. (courtesy LPAS)
21 Exterior renderings for Lance Drive apartments project in Santa Rosa. (courtesy LPAS)
22 Nearly 800 new homes are planned on a former dairy farm in northwest Santa Rosa, representing one of the largest residential developments citywide in decades. The Lance Drive apartment project site sits along Guerneville Road and Lance Drive, Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024. (Chad Surmick / The Press Democrat) 23 Exterior renderings for Lance Drive apartments project in Santa Rosa. (courtesy LPAS)
24 Exterior renderings for Lance Drive apartments project in Santa Rosa. (courtesy LPAS)
25 Exterior renderings for Lance Drive apartments project in Santa Rosa. (courtesy LPAS)
An overview of the Lance Drive apartments project in Santa Rosa. (courtesy LPAS)
26 Cyclic GXAPS
Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Accident Prediction System
Accident Prediction Report for
Public at-Grade Highway-Rail Crossings
Including:
Disclaimer/Variable Key
Accident Prediction Report
Provided By:
Federal Railroad Administration
Grade Crossing and Trespasser Outreach Division
Data Contained in this Report:
County: SONOMA
Date Prepared: 03/24/2024
27 U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Railroad
Administration
USING DATA PRODUCED BY GXAPS
(Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Accident Prediction System) GXAPS generates reports listing public highway-rail intersections by State, County, City, railroad, or crossing ID ranked by predicted accidents per year. These reports include the current highway grade crossing inventory record and the accidents over the last 5 years. These data are produced using the Federal Railroad Administration's New Accident Prediction and Severity Model (APS), 2020.
GXAPS is a statistical model that provides users an analytical tool that can assist in determining where scarce highway-rail grade crossing resources can best be directed. GXAPS does not rank crossings in terms of most to least dangerous. Use of the GXAPS accident prediction formula in this manner is incorrect and misleading.
GXAPS output enables State and local highway and law enforcement agencies to identify public highway-rail crossing locations which may require additional or specialized attention. It is also a tool which can be used by state highway authorities and railroads to nominate crossings which may require physical safety improvements or enhancements.
The GXAPS accident prediction formula is based upon two independent factors (variables) which includes: (1) basic data about a crossing's physical and operating characteristics, and (2) the last full five years of accident history data available at the crossing. These data are obtained from the FRA's inventory and accident/incident files which are subject to keypunch and submission errors. Although every attempt is made to find and correct errors, there is still a possibility that some errors exist. Erroneous, inaccurate, and non-current data will alter GXAPS accident prediction values. While approximately 100,000 inventory file changes and updates are voluntarily provided annually by States and railroads and processed by FRA into the National Inventory File, data records for specific crossings may not be completely current. Only the intended users (States and railroads) are knowledgeable as to how current the inventory data is for a particular State, railroad, or location.
It is important to understand the type of information produced by GXAPS and the limitations on the application of the output data. GXAPS does not state that specific crossings are the most dangerous. Rather, GXAPS data provides an indication that conditions are such that one crossing may possibly be more hazardous than another based on the specific data that is in the program. It is only one of many tools which can be used to assist individual States, railroads, and local highway authorities in determining where and how to initially focus attention for improving safety at public highway-rail intersections.
GXAPS is designed to nominate crossings for further evaluation based only upon the physical and operating characteristics of specific crossings as voluntarily reported and updated by States and railroads and five years of accident history data. GXAPS is not designed to single out specific crossings without considering the many other factors which may influence accident rates or probabilities. State highway planners may or may not use GXAPS. Some States utilize their own formula or model which may include other geographic and site-specific factors. At best, GXAPS nominates crossings for further on- the- ground review by knowledgeable highway traffic engineers and specialists. The output information is not the end or final product, and the GXAPS data should not be used for non-intended purposes.
It should also be noted that there are certain characteristics or factors which are not, nor can be, included in the GXAPS database. These include sight- distance, highway congestion, bus or hazardous material traffic, local topography, and passenger exposure (train or vehicle), etc. Be aware that GXAPS is only one model and that other accident prediction models which may be used by States may yield different, but just as valid results for ranking crossings for safety improvements.
Finally, it should be noted that this database is not the sole indicator of the condition of a specific public highway-rail intersection. The GXAPS output must be considered as a supplement to the information needed to undertake specific actions aimed at enhancing highway-rail crossing safety at locations across the U.S. The authority and jurisdiction to appropriate resources toward the safety improvement or elimination of specific crossings lies with the individual States.
28 U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Railroad
Administration
VARIABLE KEY
for use with GXAPS Reports
The lists produced are only for public at-grade highway-rail intersections for the entity listed at the top of the page. The parameters shown are those used in the accident prediction calculation.
PRED ACC
RANK:
Crossings are listed in order and ranked with the highest accident prediction value first.
AVG PRED
ACC:
The accident prediction value is the probability that an accident between a train and a highway vehicle will occur at the crossing in a year.
HIST AVG
PRED ACC:
The historical accident prediction value is the probability that an accident between a train and a highway vehicle will occur at the crossing in a year.
GX ID: The unique site specific DOT/AAR Crossing Inventory Number.
RR CODE: The unique alphabetic FRA railroad code for the specific railroad.
CITY, STATE
(COUNTY):
The city, state, and county which the crossing is located.
STREET: The name of the road, street, or highway (if provided) where the crossing is located.
YEARLY
ACCIDENT
COUNT:
The number of accidents reported to FRA in each of the years indicated. Note:
Most recent year is partial year (data is not for the complete calendar year) unless Accidents per Year is 'AS OF DECEMBER 31'.
DATE CHG: The date of the latest change of the warning device category at the crossing which impacts the accident prediction calculation, e.g., a change from crossbucks to flashing lights, or flashing lights to gates.The accident prediction calculation utilizes three different formulas, on each for (1) passive devices, (2) flashing lights only, and (3) flashing lights with gates.When a date is shown, the accident history prior to the indicated year - month is not included in calculating the accident prediction value.
W D: The type of warning device shown on the current Inventory record for the crossing where: FQ = Four Quad Gates; GT = All Other Gates; FL = Flashing lights; HS = Wigwags, Highway Signals, Bells, or Other Activated; SP = Special Protection(e.g., a flagman); SS = Stop Signs; XB = Crossbucks; OS = Other Signs or Signals; NO = No Signs or Signals.
TOT TRN: Total number of trains per day at the crossing.
TOT TRK: Total number of railroad tracks between the warning devices at the crossing.
TTBL SPD: The maximum (allowable) timetable speed for trains through the crossing.
HWY PVD: Is the highway paved on both sides of the crossing? HWY LNS: The number of highway traffic lanes crossing the tracks at the crossing.
AADT: The average daily traffic count of highway vehicles at the crossing. 29 U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Railroad
Administration
RANKED PUBLIC HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSINGS
Date generated: 03/24/2024. Source: https://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/gxaps-app/#/ Current Cycle Current Cycle-1 Current Cycle-2 Current Cycle-3 Current Cycle-4 01/01/2023-12/31/2024 01/01/2022-12/31/2023 01/01/2021-12/31/2022 01/01/2020-12/31/2021 01/01/2019-12/31/2020 Yearly Accident Count
PRED
ACC
RANK
AVG
PRED
ACC
GX ID RR
Code
CITY, STATE
(COUNTY)
STREET C C1 C2 C3 C4 DATE
CHG
W
D
TOT
TRN
TOT
TRK
TTBL
SPD
HWY
PVD
HWY
LNS
AADT
1 0.751592 498673P SMRT ROHNERT
PARK, CA
(SONOMA)
GOLF COURSE DR 1 1 0 0 3 GT 34 1 79 Yes 6 23000
2 0.317131 498674W SMRT ROHNERT
PARK, CA
(SONOMA)
ROHNERT PARK EXPY 1 1 0 0 0 GT 10 null 40 Yes 4 27000
3 0.171547 498566A SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
W STEELE LN 0 0 1 0 0 GT 32 1 70 Yes 3 8700
4 0.169148 498569V SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
SAN MIGUEL AV 0 0 0 0 1 GT 32 1 79 Yes 2 4800
5 0.167138 498565T SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
GUERNEVILLE RD 0 0 0 0 1 GT 32 2 40 Yes 4 28000
6 0.158765 498689L SMRT PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
E D ST 0 1 0 0 0 FQ 26 1 25 Yes 3 18700
7 0.157905 498671B SMRT ROHNERT
PARK, CA
(SONOMA)
SCENIC AV 0 0 0 0 1 GT 26 1 79 Yes 2 1500
8 0.035597 498568N SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
PINER RD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 32 1 79 Yes 4 23900
9 0.034124 498663J SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
HEARN AV 0 0 0 0 0 GT 32 1 79 Yes 3 20600
10 0.031285 498682N SMRT PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
N MCDOWELL BL 0 0 0 0 0 GT 26 1 79 Yes 4 19600
11 0.031227 498564L SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
COLLEGE AV 0 0 0 0 0 GT 32 3 60 Yes 4 28600
12 0.030534 498664R SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
BELLEVUE AV 0 0 0 0 0 FQ 32 1 79 Yes 2 8700
13 0.028314 498681G SMRT PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
CORONA RD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 26 1 79 Yes 2 13800
14 0.024653 498662C SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
W BARHAM AV 0 0 0 0 0 GT 32 1 79 Yes 2 4100
15 0.023529 498661V SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
SEBASTOPOL AV 0 0 0 0 0 GT 32 2 60 Yes 2 6600
16 0.019772 498685J SMRT PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
W PAYRAN ST 0 0 0 0 0 GT 26 3 45 Yes 2 9000
17 0.019355 498642R SMRT HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
HEALDSBURG AVE 0 0 0 0 0 02/2022 NO 6 null 25 Yes 4 28079 18 0.019158 498675D SMRT ROHNERT
PARK, CA
(SONOMA)
SOUTHWEST BL 0 0 0 0 0 GT 26 1 45 Yes 4 12900
19 0.017991 498563E SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
W 9TH ST 0 0 0 0 0 FQ 32 4 45 Yes 2 5000
20 0.017364 498687X SMRT PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
LAKEVILLE ST 0 0 0 0 0 GT 26 1 45 Yes 2 5700
21 0.015794 498683V SMRT PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
SOUTHPOINT BL 0 0 0 0 0 06/2020 GT 26 1 79 Yes 2 2500
22 0.015106 498688E SMRT PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
E WASHINGTON ST 0 0 0 0 0 GT 26 1 25 Yes 5 21500
23 0.014983 498659U SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
W 3RD ST 0 0 0 0 0 GT 32 5 25 Yes 4 10100
24 0.014106 498676K SMRT COTATI, CA
(SONOMA)
E COTATI AV 0 0 0 0 0 GT 10 null 40 Yes 4 17200
25 0.013139 498670U SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
TODD RD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 10 null 40 Yes 2 13400
26 0.01309 498665X SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
W ROBLES AV 0 0 0 0 0 GT 32 1 79 Yes 2 1000
27 0.01207 498570P SMRT FUL TON, CA
(SONOMA)
FUL TON RD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 8 null 40 Yes 2 16000
28 0.011961 498571W SMRT FUL TON, CA
(SONOMA)
RIVER RD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 8 null 40 Yes 3 15500
29 0.011295 498679F SMRT PENNGROVE,
CA (SONOMA)
MAIN ST PETALUMA
HILL RD
0 0 0 0 0 FQ 10 null 35 Yes 2 10700
30 30 0.010819 498657F SMRT WINDSOR, CA
(SONOMA)
STARR RD 0 0 0 0 0 02/2022 FL 8 null 40 Yes 2 5100
31 0.010793 498658M SMRT WINDSOR, CA
(SONOMA)
WINDSOR RIVER RD
AT WINDSOR RD
0 0 0 0 0 GT 8 null 40 Yes 8 10800
32 0.008491 498574S SMRT WINDSOR, CA
(SONOMA)
SHILOH RD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 8 null 40 Yes 4 10500
33 0.007428 498692U SMRT PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
CAULFIELD LN 0 0 0 0 0 GT 26 2 25 Yes 4 2500
34 0.006722 498678Y SMRT PENNGROVE,
CA (SONOMA)
ADOBE RD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 10 null 35 Yes 2 3900
35 0.006722 498680A SMRT PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
ELY RD N 0 0 0 0 0 GT 10 null 35 Yes 2 3900
36 0.006262 498708N SMRT AMERICAN
CANYON, CA
(SONOMA)
SEARS POINT RD / SR
37 0 0 0 0 0 GT 6 null 25 Yes 3 35600
37 0.005831 498575Y SMRT WINDSOR, CA
(SONOMA)
MITCHELL LN 0 0 0 0 0 GT 8 null 40 Yes 2 2800
38 0.005778 498561R SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
W 7TH ST 0 0 0 0 0 GT 32 5 25 Yes 2 800
39 0.005556 498562X SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
W 8TH ST 0 0 0 0 0 GT 26 2 25 Yes 2 900
40 0.005556 498833B SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
W 6TH ST 0 0 0 0 0 GT 26 3 25 Yes 2 900
41 0.005482 498677S SMRT COTATI, CA
(SONOMA)
E RAILROAD AV 0 0 0 0 0 GT 10 null 40 Yes 2 1400
42 0.00531 498643X SMRT HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
FRONT ST 0 0 0 0 0 GT 10 null 25 Yes 2 5900
43 0.004974 498650H SMRT HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
LIMERICK LN 0 0 0 0 0 GT 10 null 40 Yes 2 1600
44 0.004974 498645L SMRT HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
BAILHACHE AV 0 0 0 0 0 GT 10 null 40 Yes 2 1600
45 0.004712 498638B NWP HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
DRY CREEK RD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 6 null 40 Yes 2 4200
46 0.00459 498639H NWP HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
W GRANT ST 0 0 0 0 0 GT 6 null 40 Yes 2 3830
47 0.004555 498633S NWP HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
LYTTON STATION RD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 6 null 40 Yes 2 6000
48 0.003574 498646T SMRT HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
GRANT AV 0 0 0 0 0 GT 10 null 40 Yes 2 500
49 0.003289 863475A NWP HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
MATHESON ST 0 0 0 0 0 SS 6 null 25 Yes 2 200
50 0.002753 498613F NWP GEYSERVILLE,
CA (SONOMA)
MERRILL ST 0 0 0 0 0 SS 6 null 40 Yes 2 100
51 0.002753 498612Y NWP GEYSERVILLE,
CA (SONOMA)
WOODS LANE 0 0 0 0 0 SS 6 null 40 Yes 1 100
52 0.002579 498640C NWP HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
WEST NORTH ST 0 0 0 0 0 SS 6 null 25 Yes 2 60
53 0.00253 498714S SMRT AMERICAN
CANYON, CA
(SONOMA)
FREMONT DR / SR 121 0 0 0 0 0 GT 4 null 25 Yes 2 15600
54 0.002518 498578U NWP CLOVERDALE,
CA (SONOMA)
MCCRAY RD 0 0 0 0 0 SS 6 null 30 Yes 2 200
55 0.002499 498690F SMRT PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
HOPPER ST 0 0 0 0 0 02/2022 GT 12 null 20 Yes 2 300
56 0.002393 498614M NWP GEYSERVILLE,
CA (SONOMA)
GEYSERVILLEST 128 0 0 0 0 0 GT 6 null 40 Yes 2 1500
57 0.002248 498637U NWP HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
CHIQUTTA RD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 6 null 40 Yes 2 500
58 0.002082 912093R SMRT FUL TON, CA
(SONOMA)
AVIATION BL 0 0 0 0 0 GT 2 null 40 Yes 2 5200
59 0.001977 498591H NWP CLOVERDALE,
CA (SONOMA)
AIRPORT RD. 0 0 0 0 0 XB 6 null 40 Yes 2 50
60 0.001881 751343E SMRT SONOMA, CA
(SONOMA)
SR. ROUTE 12/121 0 0 0 0 0 GT 5 null 20 Yes 2 8000
61 0.001685 863374N NWP PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
WASHINGTON ST 0 0 0 0 0 FL 2 null 10 Yes 4 11400
62 0.001683 498579B NWP CLOVERDALE,
CA (SONOMA)
FIRST ST 0 0 0 0 0 GT 6 null 40 Yes 2 700
63 0.001574 498729G NWP SONOMA, CA
(SONOMA)
MACARTHUR RD 0 0 0 0 0 SS 2 null 15 Yes 2 4000
64 0.001556 498707G SMRT SONOMA, CA
(SONOMA)
TOULAY CREEK ROAD 0 0 0 0 0 HS 6 null 25 Yes 2 200
65 0.001515 498596S NWP ASTI, CA
(SONOMA)
WASHINGTONSCHRD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 6 null 40 Yes 1 300
66 0.001451 498735K NWP SONOMA, CA
(SONOMA)
E. NAPA ST 0 0 0 0 0 SS 2 null 15 Yes 2 3000
67 0.001099 863369S NWP PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
F ST 0 0 0 0 0 SS 2 null 10 Yes 2 500
68 0.001099 863367D NWP PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
FIRST ST 0 0 0 0 0 NO 2 null 10 Yes 2 500
31 69 0.001097 863476G NWP SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
ROBERTS AVE 0 0 0 0 0 SS 2 null 10 Yes 2 700
70 0.001077 751336U SMRT SONOMA, CA
(SONOMA)
SKAGGS ISLAND RD. 0 0 0 0 0 GT 5 null 20 Yes 2 700
71 0.00103 498736S NWP SONOMA, CA
(SONOMA)
7TH ST. EAST 0 0 0 0 0 SS 2 null 15 Yes 2 900
72 0.000959 859203F NWP SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
DUTTON AVE 0 0 0 0 0 GT 2 null 10 Yes 2 12200
73 0.000951 863373G NWP PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
WATER ST 0 0 0 0 0 NO 2 null 10 Yes 2 300
74 0.000951 863372A NWP PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
C ST 0 0 0 0 0 SS 2 null 10 Yes 2 300
75 0.000951 863370L NWP PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
E ST 0 0 0 0 0 SS 2 null 10 Yes 2 300
76 0.000951 863368K NWP PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
G ST 0 0 0 0 0 SS 2 null 10 Yes 2 300
77 0.000951 863366W NWP PETALUMA, CA
(SONOMA)
H ST 0 0 0 0 0 NO 2 null 10 Yes 2 300
78 0.000832 498728A NWP SONOMA, CA
(SONOMA)
DENMARK ST 0 0 0 0 0 XB 2 null 15 Yes 2 300
79 0.000782 498715Y NWP AMERICAN
CANYON, CA
(SONOMA)
8TH ST E 0 0 0 0 0 02/2022 GT 2 null 10 Yes 3 2300
80 0.000648 498730B NWP SONOMA, CA
(SONOMA)
ACCESS RD 0 0 0 0 0 SS 2 null 15 Yes 2 200
81 0.000572 859202Y NWP SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
ROSELAND AV. 0 0 0 0 0 SS 2 null 10 Yes 2 50
82 0.000474 498669A SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
STANDISH AVE. 0 0 0 0 0 XB 2 null 10 Yes 2 100
83 0.000224 498703E SMRT NOVATO, CA
(SONOMA)
BAY TRAIL PED 0 0 0 0 0 03/2022 FL 2 1 25 Yes 0 1
84 0 859165Y SMRT ROHNERT
PARK, CA
(SONOMA)
COPELAND CREEK
PED
0 0 0 0 0 02/2022 FL 0 null 0 Yes 0 1
85 0 498648G SMRT HEALDSBURG,
CA (SONOMA)
GRANT SCHOOL ROAD 0 0 0 0 0 NO 0 null 25 Yes 2 200
86 0 498572D SMRT FUL TON, CA
(SONOMA)
AIRPORT BLVD 0 0 0 0 0 GT 0 2 25 Yes 2 600
87 0 943167R SMRT SANTA ROSA,
CA (SONOMA)
SANTA ROSA
DOWNTOWN STATION
0 0 0 0 0 HS 30 null 30 Yes 0 null
88 0 498704L SMRT BLACK POINT,
CA (SONOMA)
RECLAMATION RD-1 0 0 0 0 0 11/2021 FL 2 1 25 Yes 0 null TTL: 0.02863 2 3 1 0 6
32