MTC, November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 1 Resolution No. _____ page _1__ of _2__
Exhibit A-1
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
1. Agency City of Santa Rosa
2. Primary Contact Torina Wilson
3. Mailing Address 69 Stony Circle, Santa Rosa, CA 95401
4. Email Address [email protected] 5. Phone Number 707-543-3910
6. Secondary Contact (in
the event primary is
not available)
Rob Sprinkle
7. Mailing address (if
different) N/A☐
8. Email Address [email protected] 9. Phone Number 707-543-3817
10. Send allocation
instructions to (if
different from above):
11. Project Title Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon Installations
12. Amount requested $27,341 13. Fiscal Year of
Claim
2024/25
14. Description of Overall Project:
15. Project Scope Proposed for Funding: (Project level environmental, preliminary planning, and ROW
16. P roject Location: First priority location is the intersection of Stony Point Road and Stony Circle. If there are enough leftover funds, the second priority location is W Steele Lane at Apache Street.
Project Relation to Regional Policies (for information only)
17. Is the project in an Equity Priority Community? Y es☒ No☐
18. Is this project in a Priority Development Area or a Transit-Oriented Community? Y es ☐ No☒
19. Project Budget and Schedule
Installation of RRFBs at a maximum of two locations in the City.
Construction
Multiple locations throughout the City of Santa Rosa. Locations include: Stony Point Road at Stony Circle and W Steele Lane at Apache Way
November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 2
Project Eligibility
A. Has the project been reviewed by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee? Yes☒ No☐ If “YES,” identify the date and provide a copy or link to the agenda.
If "NO," provide an explanation).
B. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? Yes☐ No☒ If "NO," provide expected date:__4/9/2024________________
C. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? Yes☒ No☐ (If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page)
D. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria Yes☐ No☐ pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual?
E. 1. Is the project categorically exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CCR Section 15301(c), Yes☒ No☐ Existing Facility?
2. If “NO” above, is the project is exempt from CEQA for another reason? Yes☐ No☐ Cite the basis for the exemption. __________________________ N/A☐ If the project is not exempt, please check “NO,” and provide environmental documentation, as appropriate.
F. Estimated Completion Date of project (month and year): _____10/2025_______
G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has Yes☒ No☐ the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility, please identify below and provide the agreement.
H. Is a Complete Streets Checklist required for this project ? Yes☐ No☒ If the amount requested is over $250,000 or if the total project phase or construction phase is over $250,000, a Complete Streets checklist is likely required. Please attach the Complete Streets checklist or record of review, as applicable. More information and the form may be found here: https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/transportation/complete-streets Project Phase TDA 3 Other Funds Total Cost Estimated Completion (month/year)
Bike/Ped Plan
ENV
PA&ED
PS&E
ROW
CON 27,341
Total Cost 27,341
TDA Article 3 Claim Applications Appendix A Page 1
This project received funding in FY 23/24, specifically to install a minimum of seven RRFBs at the following locations: Dutton Avenue/Funston Drive, Hoen Avenue/Sierra Circle, Summerfield Road/Parktrail Drive, Mendocino Avenue/ Howard Street, North Dutton Avenue/West Eighth Street, Cleveland Avenue/State Farm Drive, & Sebastopol Road/Laurel Grove