Agenda Item #16.2
For Council Meeting of: September 24, 2024
CITY OF SANTA ROSA
CITY COUNCIL
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DONTE WATSON, DIRECTOR, RECREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: ROSELAND CREEK COMMUNITY PARK – CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT; APPROVE THE ROSELAND CREEK COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN; AND ADOPT THE CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AGENDA ACTION: PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Recreation and Parks Department that the Council, by resolution: 1) certify the Final Environmental Impact Report; 2) approve the Roseland Creek Community Park Master Plan; and 3) adopt the related CEQA Findings of Fact and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed Roseland Creek Community Park Master Plan (Master Plan) provides a comprehensive Master Plan that includes myriad park amenities reflective of the community’s collective input. The Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) was prepared in accordance with CEQA to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with adoption of the Roseland Creek Community Park Master Plan and identifies mitigation measures that when implemented will reduce all potential impacts to less than significant levels.
BACKGROUND
Roseland Creek Community Park (Park) is identified as an approximately 19.50-acre community park site in the Santa Rosa 2035 General Plan and the Recreation and Parks Business and Strategic Action Plan. Roseland Creek Community Park is located in the southwest quadrant of the city of Santa Rosa and is bisected by Roseland Creek towards the southern portion of the park. The park site is across Burbank Avenue from Roseland Creek Elementary School and is otherwise surrounded by residential subdivisions, one rural residential lot, and planned multi-family housing.
Roseland Creek Community Park consists of four land parcels with the following addresses and Assessor’s Parcel numbers (APN) listed from the northern parcel to the southern parcel:
1027 McMinn Avenue, APN # 125-252-004
1060 Burbank Avenue, APN # 125-252-002
1370 Burbank Avenue, APN # 125-252-003
1400 Burbank Avenue, APN # 125-331-001
The land for Roseland Creek Community Park was acquired from individual landowners with funding from the Southwest Area Park Development Impact fees and from the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District’s (District) Matching Grant Program. As part of the Matching Grant Program, the District has imposed conditions on the park land that generally limit active park amenities and non-permeable surfaces. See Attachment 1 for descriptions of District conditions.
The 1370 Burbank Avenue was the last acquisition and was complete in 2018. After acquisition was complete, the District and the City mutually agreed that it would be best to have one easement and one recreation covenant over the entire Park site, rather than three separate conservation easements, because the City now owns all the Park parcels. Thus, the District and the City are in the process of combining the conservation easements and recreation covenant into a single easement agreement. The current Master Plan as shown in Exhibit C meets the requirements of the three conservation easements and recreation covenant.
The Master Plan is a guide for the type and placement of assets on the site as funding becomes available, and aides the City in applying for grants to improve the site. In order to comply with the requirements set forth in the District Conservation Easement, including limits on permeable surfaces and compliance with all state and local codes and regulations, all proposed parking areas and walkways would be constructed with permeable pavement, except for areas where extra support is needed for ADA compliance.
On February 28, 2017, Council approved an Agreement Number F001375 with David J Powers & Associates (DJP), Inc, San Jose, CA to provide environmental analysis for the proposed Roseland Creek Community Park Master Plan.
On February 28, 2017, Council approved Agreement Number F001374 with Design Workshop Landscape Architects, Inc., of Tahoe, NV to provide a Master Plan and 30% design and engineering plans for Roseland Creek Community Park. Design services included assisting the City with preparation of the Master Plan and neighborhood meetings, and workshops as needed.
Roseland Creek Community Park requires a community developed and Council approved Master Plan to construct the Park with amenities as desired by the community. The Master Plan, in turn, requires environmental analysis to determine any environmental impacts and identify mitigation required for future Park development.
If Council certifies the Final EIR and approves the Master Plan, and as funding becomes available, the City will move forward with development of the Park as approved in the Master Plan, District conservation easements and recreation covenant.
PRIOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
On January 14, 2020, as part of a public hearing, Council received a staff presentation recommending adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration in compliance with CEQA and a Master Plan for Roseland Creek Community Park. As part of the public comment period, a community member submitted a separate Park plan option for Council. Council requested staff utilize the plan prepared by the community member to solicit further feedback from stakeholders regarding the future Master Plan amenities. Staff conducted a public meeting where the community member’s plan was presented on March 4, 2020, and further met with stakeholders through a series of listening sessions held by Council Member Alvarez (Council District 1).
On September 28, 2021, as part of a public hearing, Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved a Master Plan for Roseland Creek Community Park. The Master Plan was updated for clarity based on additional community feedback.
On January 25, 2022, Council received a staff presentation recommending rescission of the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved Master Plan for Roseland Creek Community Park so staff could instead pursue a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Roseland Creek Community Park Master Plan. At the conclusion of that meeting the Council voted to rescind its prior adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of the Master Plan so that an EIR could be prepared.
ANALYSIS
The process for development of a Master Plan began with the community in 2009 with five (5) community workshops which produced a conceptual park plan. The conceptual plan was provided to the Board of Community Services for feedback and then utilized as part of an application to the District for matching grant funds to purchase the Roseland Creek Community Park land. The summaries from those meetings indicates that the desires of the community were quite varied, with some members wanting very little to no development and others that wanted more intensive park amenities and activities.
Between 2010 and 2014 no work or outreach was performed for the Master Plan due to lack of park planning staff. In 2015 community meetings began again for the Master Plan to check in with the community to determine whether there was still interest in the 2010 plan or whether there was any interest in updating the 2010 Plan. Meetings in 2015 included providing information to the community about existing and planned nearby parks and amenities and a summary of all comments and actions taken in 2009 and 2010.
The following public meetings, including meetings by the Board of Community Services (BOCS), were held to solicit feedback from the community regarding their desired Park amenities as follows:
• 2009 – 2010: 5 Community Workshops
• February 10, 2010: BOCS
• 2015: 4 Community Workshops
• July 22, 2015: BOCS
• August 26, 2015: BOCS
• September 16, 2017: Community Workshop
• October 7, 2017: Roseland Binational Health Fair
• December 2, 2017: Community Workshop
• February 28, 2018: BOCS
• March 28, 2018: BOCS (received recommendation for Council approval) • March 22, 2019: Sheppard Elementary
• April 17, 2019: Roseland Prep High School
• May 5, 2019: Roseland Cinco de Mayo
• June 6, 2019: Chelsea Gardens Senior Community
• July 10, 2019: SW Santa Rosa Health Action meeting
• August 8, 2019: Land Paths Garden celebration
In addition to the above meetings, all Roseland Annexation and Santa Rosa/Sebastopol Road Specific Plan meetings were attended by City Park staff to solicit additional feedback from community members and provide an opportunity for sharing information. The Master Plan was also presented at various Community Advisory Board (CAB) annual open house meetings to solicit feedback regarding the planned amenities. Feedback received during these events was incorporated into the Master Plan.
The community was also provided with basic information regarding potential site opportunities and constraints. Early versions of the Master Plan included amenities such as walking trails that looped through the park and along the creek, pedestrian and bicycle trail, playground and picnicking areas with a restroom building nearby, nature center with restrooms and parking, a Pomo interpretive village, outdoor classroom, two pedestrian bridges, and interpretive signage. The first Master Plan version also included items such as constructed wetlands/vernal pools and overlooks into Roseland Creek.
The Master Plan was modified eight more times through community and stakeholder feedback, site investigations, and environmental review. For example, the Citywide Creek Master Plan (CCMP) already has a plan for restoration of Roseland Creek, thus the creek area was removed from the Master Plan and a reference to the CCMP was added to eliminate duplication. Additionally, the City’s consulting biologist determined that efforts to construct new wetlands on the park site in areas proposed by community members would likely be unsuccessful in establishing wetland characteristics due to insufficient runoff in normal and above average rainfall years. Therefore, reference to creating vernal pools was removed from the Master Plan.
In asking community members about the intentions regarding early concepts that show a Pomo interpretive village, community input suggested the village should instead be picnic areas with a Pomo tribal theme. Tribes that have registered with the City to be notified for any and all developments are the Federated Indians of the Graton Rancheria (FIGR) and the Lytton Rancheria of California (LRC). The FIGR had interest in meeting to discuss the Master Plan. Upon meeting, FIGR expressed no interest in having a “Pomo village” and suggested no references to “Pomo village” be included in the Park. Further, the FIGR expressed concern that the City would lead such an effort without their expressed interest. When asked what amenities the FIGR would like to see at the Park, the request was for fire (barbeques), water (outdoor sink), picnicking, parking with access for elders and proximity to restrooms, and identification of all native tree species along the southern side of Roseland Creek for collecting acorns. The LRC reviewed the Master Plan and had no comments.
Although Dry Creek Pomo Rancheria (DCPR) is not registered with the City to be notified of development, interest from a resident who claimed to be connected to this tribe requested the “Pomo village” concept remain in the Master Plan. Thus, the DCPR was contacted by City staff and no reply was received.
The Master Plan continued to develop, and in meeting with the City Traffic Engineering team it was requested that the crosswalk to Roseland Creek Elementary school shift south so that students crossing Burbank Avenue would only have to cross vehicles one time entering the school grounds. Adjusting the crosswalk will provide a safer route to school for students. Also, as part of the Roseland Area/ Sebastopol Road Specific Plan the community desired a rural aesthetic which eliminated the requirement for traditional sidewalks along Burbank Avenue. Therefore, the path of travel for pedestrians utilizing the eastern side of Burbank Avenue is redirected through the Park. Although traditional curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required along the portion of the Park adjacent to McMinn Avenue.
Throughout the entire Park master planning process, the pedestrian and bicycle trails, nature center, and parking were consistently the most agreed upon amenities within the community. There are community members that would like the Park to be mostly undeveloped and open space or preserved. There are also community members that would prefer a large sports field or an arena for soccer, baseball and softball, pump track, bicycle racing, a dog park, and similar more intensive uses.
The Park land does not contain enough open space to accommodate large sport fields such as soccer and baseball fields, or bicycle racing area.
The Master Plan as presented in Exhibit C provides a plan that includes the most common community desires for the Roseland Creek Community Park land.
Each community meeting involved the following outreach strategies or combinations thereof:
Direct mail postcard to residents (8447) and property owners (3254) in the southwest quadrant of Santa Rosa Email-blast to residents who attended 2015 Roseland planning meetings and opted to subscribe to Roseland notifications Email-blast to Santa Rosa residents who subscribe to Recreation & Parks e-Newsletter Email-blast to Neighborhood Services contact list
Notification/advisory to local media contacts
Facebook Event Page on Santa Rosa Recreation & Parks and Community Engagement Facebook page Featured in Rec & Parks e-Newsletter
News Flash on santarosarec.com and srcity.org
Social media posts, including NextDoor and Facebook
Flyer distribution at Roseland Community Center
Onsite postings at future Park property
Upon direction received from Council at the January 14, 2020, meeting, staff conducted another meeting with the community on March 4, 2020, at Cook Middle school. At the direction of Council, a citizen’s plan was provided to the community in addition to the master plan developed by the city through community outreach. The community meeting agenda was developed by the City’s Marketing and Outreach staff and Community Engagement staff who brought in Qi Consulting to assist with hosting and connecting attendees. The meeting included presentations consisting of information from Planning and Economic Development, Transit, Water, Bicycle and Pedestrian staff, and Parks staff regarding the future of Roseland.
The feedback from the March 4, 2020, meeting was similar to all previous feedback received where some citizens, especially those that live closer to the Park, were interested in very little development, with the exception that they desired a Nature Center with a restroom, undeveloped trails and a parking lot. Other citizens in Roseland were interested in additional amenities including picnic tables, playgrounds, a restroom near the playground, sports court, lawn, community garden, and trails.
The two plans, while graphically different, share many similarities and it was understood from the March 4th meeting that re-engaging with the community members to evaluate the similarities would be fruitful to clarify the Master Plan. Around this same time Council Member Alvarez was elected to represent Council District 1, which includes the area where the Roseland Creek Community Park is located. Council Member Alvarez conducted six listening sessions with the last listening session bringing together the various community members with divergent ideas about what the Park should entail in an effort to discuss those differences and hopefully reach consensus.
The following list summarizes the listening sessions held by Council Member Alvarez to collect input about Roseland and what amenities the community members desire in the Park and for that information to be shared with staff to refine the Master Plan:
February 11, 2021: Cook Middle School
February 24, 2021: Roseland Creek Elementary Parent Group March 1, 2021: Roseland Community Builders Initiative
March 17, 2021: Boys and Girls Club, Juvenile Hall boys group March 17, 2021: Boys and Girls Club, Juvenile Hall girls group March 22, 2021: Neighbor-wood group
April 9, 2021: Listening Session working group
The information collected from the Listening Sessions helped clarify the Master Plan and importantly it also allowed for community members to discuss with each other their desires for the Park. Community members were engaged with each other to listen to all their desires. The Master Plan was updated to provide additional clarity.
The revisions to the Master Plan reflect clarifications made to the Master Plan and interests to keep most of the Park in its natural state while allowing for some traditional amenities. The Master Plan provides for more than 80% of the Park site to be left in its natural state or be restored to a more native area by special interest groups. Most of the more traditional parts of the Park that include single use picnic tables, playground, sport court area, lawn, and community garden/outdoor classroom and nature center are in the southern portions of the Park. A multipurpose trail is part of the Master Plan that allows bicycles and pedestrians to share the trail and there is a pathway that loops the entire park with interpretive signage in at least three languages.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this action does not have a fiscal impact on the General Fund. Funding for environmental analysis of the Master Plan as shown in Exhibit C was already allocated in previous fiscal years from park development impact (PDI) fees collected in Zone 2 (Southwest Quadrant).
Additionally, funding from PDI fees is available to complete the future construction documents and permits necessary to construct the trail from McMinn Avenue to Burbank Avenue and add the crosswalk as required by District Agreement upon certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and approval of the Master Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
An environmental analysis of the proposed Master Plan’s potential impacts was prepared by City staff together with assistance from the City’s consultant David J Powers & Associates (DJP). DJP started the studies necessary for the original Initial Study in 2017 with the start of a full and final draft environmental analysis based on BOCS recommended approval of the draft Master Plan on March 28, 2018. The analysis resulted in a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Roseland Creek Community Park Master Plan, which was adopted by the City Council on September 28, 2021, and later rescinded by City Council on January 25, 2022, based on a desire to pursue a full Environmental Impact Report for the same Master Plan.
Subsequently, DJP began the process of preparing an Environmental Impact Report based on the Master Plan previously adopted by the City Council. An Environmental Impact Report is a more expanded review than the Mitigated Negative Declaration process regarding potential environmental impacts which may result from the implementation of a project.
A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and includes the following sections for evaluation: Aesthetics, Agricultural and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal and Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire. Additionally, the EIR reviews Growth-Inducing Impacts, Significant and Irreversible Environmental Changes, Significant and Unavoidable Impacts and Alternatives.
The DEIR identified the following potentially significant environmental impacts that could result from implementation of the Master Plan: impacts to special-status bat species from building demolition; impacts to Northwestern Pond Turtles from construction activities; impacts to California tiger salamander upland dispersal habitat from construction activities; impacts to nesting birds from construction and tree removal; impacts to archaeological resources during construction; impacts from hazardous materials during building demolition and soil disturbance; and construction noise impacts. As explained and demonstrated in the EIR, all of the Master Plan project’s potentially significant impacts will be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through implementation of recommended mitigation measures or through compliance with existing Municipal Code requirements and/or City standards.
Recommended mitigation measures are summarized in the Final EIR (FEIR), and attached to this Staff Report, specifically Exhibit B of the Resolution with detailed mitigation measures described in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP). The FEIR has been prepared in consultation with local, state and trustee agencies, in accordance with Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and will serve as the environmental compliance document required under CEQA for the planned improvements and for permits/approvals required by a responsible agency.
In conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the FEIR provides objective information regarding the environmental consequences of the proposed project. The FEIR also examines mitigation measures and explores a reasonable range of alternatives to the project intended to reduce or eliminate significant environmental impacts. The FEIR includes a discussion that identifies alternatives to the project Master Plan as proposed in Exhibit C of the Resolution. The Alternatives discussed include; No Project Alternative
No Project - Existing General Plan Development Alternative Active Use Master Plan Alternative
Artificial Turf Field Alternative
Neighborwood Master Plan Alternative
2010 Concept Plan Alternative
The review of alternatives shows that none of the project alternatives meet the objectives of the project as well as the proposed Master Plan does without partially increasing impacts. Additionally, alternatives that would reduce some less than significant impacts of the project would not fully meet the project objectives and would also reduce the variety of park amenities provided on the site.
The Project Objectives outlined in the FEIR include the following:
Core Project Objectives
• Increase park acreage in the southwest area of the City to meet General Plan standards of 3.5 acres of City parks per 1,000 residents, and • Provide a publicly accessible Community Park in the Roseland area to serve residents generally within a one-mile radius with equal opportunities for passive and active recreation, and
• Develop park uses consistent with conservation easements held for the property by the District, and
• Provide amenities for the site consistent with input provided by tribal nations registered with the City of Santa Rosa such as providing drinking fountains, restrooms, group picnic areas, barbecues, parking near play equipment and picnic areas, parking for elders, interpretation of tree species, and • Provide non-permeable bicycle and pedestrian public access across and throughout the site for community members of all abilities, including ADA- compliant features to provide equal access for all, and • Provide large industry standard and natural youth play equipment with areas for children ages 2-5 and 5-12, and
• Provide for emergency vehicle access to all areas of the park to ensure public safety.
Full Project Objectives
• Provide spaces for picnic events, site specific unique features, natural areas, community gardens and a recreational facility for community use, and • Provide fitness equipment and sport court areas for promoting a healthy lifestyle, and
• Provide one large, irrigated lawn area or artificial turf to allow for casual picnicking, casual ball and frisbee type play, yoga, casual children's activities and similar recreation on a stable lawn or artificial turf surface, and • Provide active uses such as community garden and outdoor classroom gathering area, and
• Provide a park that minimizes the number of trees that need to be removed to improve the park site and provide recreation, and
• Provide interpretive and educational signs throughout the park in at least three different languages, and
• Provide fencing that will function as a natural barrier between vehicles and pedestrians traveling adjacent to Burbank Avenue and to help guide students to the future street crossing.
The proposed Master Plan shown in Exhibit C meets all the project objectives.
In accordance with Section 15082 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Santa Rosa prepared a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for this EIR. The NOP was circulated to local, state, and federal agencies on August 8, 2022. The standard 30-day comment period concluded on September 9, 2022. The NOP provided a general description of the proposed project and identified possible environmental impacts that could result from implementation of the project. The City of Santa Rosa also held a public scoping meeting on August 17, 2022, to discuss the project and solicit public input as to the scope and contents of this EIR. The meeting was held virtually.
In accordance with Section 15087 of CEQA Guidelines, the City of Santa Rosa prepared a Notice of Availability (NOA) of the Draft EIR. The NOA provided public notice regarding the Draft EIR (DEIR) availability for public review and comments. The 45-day public comment period began on April 25, 2024, and was extended to 53 days and concluded on June 17, 2024. The NOA and the DEIR were made available in the following ways:
Full printed hard copies of the DEIR were made available at the City’s Recreation & Parks Department at the Finley Community Center front desk and Parks Planning office The DEIR was posted to the City’s Recreation and Parks Department’s project web site Email notification of the NOA to all stakeholders who previously requested to be notified upon availability of the DEIR, Written and emailed notification of the NOA to Lytton and Graton tribal nations Postcards noting the availability of the DEIR mailed to all previous commenters who provided an address and to well over 2000 residents surrounding the park site Notification of the availability of the DEIR on KSRO radio station Posting regarding the availability of the DEIR in the Press Democrat newspaper The DEIR together with a Notice of Completion was circulated and submitted to the State on April 25, 2024, and is available on the State’s Clearinghouse as SCH # 2022080148. The State Clearinghouse web site can be reached using the following link: https://opr.ca.gov/sch/ or by phone at 916-445-0613.
The city prepared written responses to all comments on the DEIR received by the City and included those responses to comments in the Final EIR which is comprised of the Draft EIR, the Response to Comments document and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
If the project is approved by Council, then a Notice of Determination (NOD) will be filed and posted with both the County Clerk’s office and with the State Clearinghouse, which will be available for public inspection and posted within 24 hours of receipt.
Approval of the Roseland Creek Master Plan as shown in Exhibit C is recommended to meet the project objectives and through an adaptive process is based on all community comments received from 2009 through 2021... The FEIR identified a number of potentially significant effects that can all be reduced to levels of insignificance by adopting mitigation as presented in Exhibit A, CEQA Findings of Fact and to ensure compliance with the mitigation, a Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program is developed as shown in Exhibit B.
BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
On February 10, 2010, the Board of Community Services (BOCS) received an update regarding the master planning process from city staff. The BOCS received public comments, discussed the draft Master Plan process, and provided recommendations to city staff.
On July 22, 2015, the BOCS received a further update regarding the master planning process from city staff. The BOCS received public comments, discussed the draft Master Plan process thus far and provided additional recommendations to city staff regarding minor updates to the plan.
On August 26, 2015, the BOCS received yet another update regarding the master planning process from city staff including updates requested by the BOCS at the July 22, 2015, meeting. The BOCS received public comments, discussed the draft Master Plan process, and provided additional recommendations to city staff regarding the plan and process.
On February 28, 2018, the BOCS received another update regarding the master planning process after Design Workshop began assisting city staff with the Master Plan. The BOCS received public comments, discussed the draft Master Plan process, and provided more recommendations to city staff regarding the plan.
At the March 28, 2018, BOCS meeting, city staff presented a very detailed and thorough review of all collected data, summaries of community meetings and outreach and every update to the draft Master Plan. The BOCS received public comments, discussed the draft Master Plan, and voted unanimously in favor of the proposed park Master Plan and recommends Council approval of the same.
At the July 21, 2021, Special BOCS meeting, city staff presented a very detailed and thorough review of all collected data, summaries of community meetings and outreach and every update to the draft Master Plan. All information from the Listening Sessions conducted by Council Member Alvarez were provided to the BOCS for their review as well. The BOCS received public comments, discussed the draft Master Plan, and voted unanimously in favor of the proposed park Master Plan and recommends Council approval of the same.
NOTIFICATION
The proposed Master Plan was noticed for a Public Hearing. Notification was provided by posting a sign on site, publishing notice in a newspaper of general circulation, the Press Democrat, on September 13, 2024, and posted at City Hall, Finley Community Center and on the Recreation and Parks website.
ATTACHMENTS
Project Website Link: https://www.srcity.org/3663/Roseland-Creek-Community-Park (Links to all project documents including the Final EIR and Master Plan for Roseland Creek Community Park) Attachment 1 - Description of Conditions for Use and Development Attachment 2 - Responses to Comments from the DEIR (Response to Comments document that is part of the Final EIR) Attachment 3 - Correspondence
Resolution
Exhibit A – CEQA Findings of Fact
Exhibit B – Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP) Exhibit C – Roseland Creek Community Park Master Plan Map
PRESENTER
Jen Santos, Deputy Director of Recreation & Parks
ROSELAND CREEK COMMUNITY PARK FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PARK MASTER PLAN PAGE 3 OF 3