Cities Index.
Presentation

Santa Rosa City Council
December 10, 2024

Document
Presentation
Meeting
December 10, 2024
Body
Santa Rosa City Council
Original file
1.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

MASCOTS
Marin-Sonoma Coordinated
Transit Service Plan
Introduction &
Existing Conditions
December 10, 2024

Agenda
• Introduction
• Key Existing Conditions Findings
• Next Steps
MASCOTS Introduction
3 Why MASCOTS?

1. SMART began service: The operators
in Marin and Sonoma Counties have
not reconsidered the regional service
structure comprehensively since
SMART came into service

2. Travel Patterns have Changed: The
pandemic changed regional travel
demand and service levels/options
to/from San Francisco and East Bay
 It is an opportune moment to conduct a
comprehensive structural analysis of
transit in the Highway 101 corridor.

MASCOTS Purpose and Key Questions
Key Questions to be Addressed:
• What are the regional markets where transit can be successful? • How well is current service meeting those markets?
• How well are equity priority communities served?
• What should future service look like?
• What is the right mix of, and relationship between, regional rail, regional bus, ferry, commuter service, and local service in the Highway 101 corridor? 5 Purpose: Improve service efficiency, effectiveness, and legibility along Highway 101 corridor to better serve existing and future transit customers.

MASCOTS Approach & Outcomes
• Focus on “regional service,” along Hwy 101 corridor
• Will not repeat past work
• Will not engage in local transit planning and integration • Operator-neutral service planning exercise
• Grounded in “new normal” travel behavior and work patterns  Final Report: “Sub-Regional Strategic Operations Plan” that is intended to directly inform future service planning activities at each agency along the Highway 101 corridor
• Operational plan will consider costs, facilities, and funding 6 MASCOTS Process
7 June – August 2024
PHASE 1: Understand Current Conditions
Deliverables: Corridor Findings, Needs, and Opportunities September – December 2024
PHASE 2: Develop Solutions to Address Opportunities
Deliverables: Initial Alternatives, Refined Alternatives December 2024 – February 2025
PHASE 3: Document Impacts of Alternatives
Deliverables: Financial Impacts, Draft and Final Reports Key Existing Conditions Findings
8 Marin and Sonoma County Travel Patterns
• About 2/3 of all trips from Marin and Sonoma
Counties to San Francisco originate in San Rafael or
points further south
• More than ¾ of trips between Sonoma County and
Marin County have origins and destinations within
the SMART travel shed
• About 2/3 of trips from Sonoma and Marin Counties
to San Francisco end at Downtown, Fisherman's
Wharf, and Civic Center areas
Source: Fall 2023 data from Replica
9 SMART Implementation has
Changed Mobility between
Marin and Sonoma Counties
• More people are using transit in the
Highway 101 Corridor since SMART came
into service
• SMART is faster, more reliable, and more
frequent than the paralleling bus service
during core hours of the day
• SMART carries a larger share of the travel
market than paralleling GGT and Sonoma
County Transit service
• E.g. San Rafael to Santa Rosa trips (RT
boardings estimate fall 2024)
• Approx. SMART : 3,600; GGT 101: 680
10 GGT Service Effectiveness Across GG Bridge
• For GGT Routes to SF, 40-60% of ridership is not regional – it is within a single county
• The average GGT 130 and 150 bus is less than 1/3 full crossing GG Bridge • A significant portion of GGT’s ridership derives from something other than its original mission – carrying people to/from San Francisco 11 Percentage of Route Ridership
GGT Routes
101 114 130 132 150 154 172
% SF-SF Ridership 18% 55% 20% 33% 32% 36% 33%
% Marin-Marin Ridership 12% 4% 33% 11% 21% 3% 0%
% Sonoma-Sonoma Ridership 11% 4%
% Intercounty Ridership 59% 41% 47% 57% 47% 61% 63%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Source: Fall 2023 (164 not available); updated 2024 data underway Ferries Carry the Majority of Riders between
Marin County and San Francisco
• Ferries carry ~60% more riders than
regional bus
• Sausalito Ferry: ~900 weekday riders
• Larkspur Ferry: ~2,400 weekday riders
• Tiburon Ferry: ~390 weekday riders
• Total Ferries: ~3,690 weekday riders
• All GGT buses on the GG Bridge carry ~2,300
weekday riders (<2/3 of all ferries)
There are significant differences in fare and
frequency between ferries and buses
depending on where you start from
12 Source: Fall 2023.

Sonoma County & Sonoma
to Marin Key Findings
• SMART, GGT, and Sonoma County Transit routes
duplicate each other in 101 corridor, schedules
are not coordinated, travel times and fares vary
• SMART has replaced GGT Route 101 as
predominant rider choice for intra-Sonoma and
Sonoma-Marin County trips – when it operates
• Local services are not designed to directly
connect to SMART
• Commuter services to San Francisco are
productive, but tweaks could improve
productivity and rider experience
13 Marin County Key Findings
• Highway 101 is overserved, there are too
many all-day bus routes, each of which
carries too few riders, too many options
can create rider confusion.
• Especially between San Rafael - Marin City
• Some schedule coordination is in place,
but resources are still not optimally
deployed to maximize rider benefit
• GGT 101’s ridership between San Rafael
and San Francisco is strong and demand
could support more frequency
• Commute routes and ferries serve peak-
directional demand to SF well
14 Next Steps
15 Evaluation Process
• Develop Service
Proposals
• Evaluate Proposals
• Discuss Proposals
• Refine Proposals
PHASE 1: Understand Current Conditions
September – December 2024
PHASE 2: Develop Solutions to
Address Opportunities
Deliverables: Initial Alternatives,
Refined Alternatives
PHASE 3: Document Impacts of Alternatives
Anticipated MASCOTS Timeline:

Engagement with Boards,
Public on proposals
anticipated in early 2025

← All documents from this meeting