CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
UPDATE
City Council Meeting
December 10, 2024
Dan Hennessey, Director
Transportation and Public Works
1 COUNCIL FEEDBACK
2 Total N.
Rogers Okrepkie C.
Rogers Fleming Stapp Alvarez Metric
6 X X X X X XDeliverability
4 X X X XSafety
4 X X X XClimate
3 X X XEquity
2 X XMaintenance
Burden Easing
2 X XConnect w/
Council Goals
2 X XWalkability/
Bikeability
2 X XKeeping Past
Promises
2 X XResiliency
1 XChildren-Focused
TOTAL NEED
3 Allocated this Year Total Need Project Types
$0 $137,000,000 New Roadways
$165,000 $487,000,000 Roadway Widening
$650,000 $15,000,000 New Traffic Signals/Upgrades
$0 $6,000,000 Roundabouts
$250,000 $35,000,000 Transportation Safety
$1,200,000** $120,000,000 City Facilities
$0 $30,000,000 Transit
$1,842,586 $174,000,000 Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements $4,107,586 (0.41%) $1,004,000,000 Totals
$260,000,000 + on-going maintenance
RECENT SPENDING
4 Total FY24-25 FY23-24 FY22-23 FY21-22 FY20-21 Spending Category $2,882,602 $420,000 $410,602 $580,000 $1,047,000 $425,000 TPW Operations $3,053,096 $550,000 $1,350,000 $889,000 $169,096 $95,000 Stormwater $34,609,844 $11,342,899 $10,763,422 $2,392,000 $3,112,000 $6,999,523 Pavement Maintenance
$600,000 $250,000 $100,000 - $250,000 -Bridges
$2,240,000 $330,000 $625,000 $425,000 $250,000 $610,000 Safety Projects $2,426,462 $290,000 $1,181,000 $285,301 $490,161 $180,000 Sidewalks/Curb Ramps $3,006,000 $1,501,000 $1,004,000 $76,000 $25,000 $400,000 Intersection Improvements
$1,994,586 $977,586 $790,000 $100,000 $127,000 -Bike Facilities -- - - - -Transit Upgrades
$4,800,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 -ADA Improvements $250,000 - - - $250,000 -Facilities
$8,330,067 $1,568,799 $2,275,765 $2,380,251 $2,105,252 -Contingency $44,188,646 $365,000 $6,135,344 $14,509,166 $10,161,801 $13,017,335 Past Promises $108,381,303 $18,795,284 $25,835,133 $22,836,718 $19,187,310 $21,726,858 Total
PAST PROMISES
5 • FY20-21 to FY24-25
• Hearn / US-101 Interchange
• $12.2M
• US-101 Bicycle/Pedestrian Overcrossing
• $14.4M
• Fulton Road Widening
• $17.1M
• 40.4% of total TPW CIP budget
RE-ORGANIZATION
6 % Change FY25-26 to FY29-30 FY20-21 to FY24-25 Spending Category -13% $2,500,000 $2,882,602 TPW Operations
+15% $3,500,000 $3,053,096 Stormwater
+59% $55,000,000 $34,609,844 Pavement Maintenance
+67% $1,000,000 $600,000 Bridges
+257% $8,000,000 $2,240,000 Safety Projects
+24% $3,000,000 $2,426,462 Sidewalks/Curb Ramps
+66% $5,000,000 $3,006,000 Intersection Improvements
+151% $5,000,000 $1,994,586 Bike Facilities
- $1,000,000 -Transit Upgrades
+25% $6,000,000 $4,800,000 ADA Improvements
- - $250,000 Facilities
- - $8,330,067 Contingency
-77% $10,000,000 $44,188,646 Past Promises
$100,000,000 $108,381,303 Total
PROJECTS TO FINISH
7 • US-101 Bicycle/Pedestrian Overcrossing
• $2.0M
• Coffey Park/Fountaingrove
• $2.0M
• Calistoga Road
• $1.5M
• Stony Point LID
• $1.5M
• Stony Point Corridor Safety Enhancements
• $3.0M
EQUALITY VS. EQUITY
8 % Change FY25-26 to FY29-30 FY20-21 to FY24-25 Spending Category -13% $2,500,000 $2,882,602 TPW Operations
+15% $3,500,000 $3,053,096 Stormwater
+59% $55,000,000 $34,609,844 Pavement Maintenance
+67% $1,000,000 $600,000 Bridges
+257% $8,000,000 $2,240,000 Safety Projects
+24% $3,000,000 $2,426,462 Sidewalks/Curb Ramps
+66% $5,000,000 $3,006,000 Intersection Improvements
+151% $5,000,000 $1,994,586 Bike Facilities
- $1,000,000 -Transit Upgrades
+25% $6,000,000 $4,800,000 ADA Improvements
- - $250,000 Facilities
- - $8,330,067 Contingency
-77% $10,000,000 $44,188,646 Past Promises
$100,000,000 $108,381,303 Total
POTENTIAL PAVING
9 Downtown
Year 3 Oakmont
Year 1
Bennett Valley
Year 1/4
Rincon Valley
Year 2
Roseland
Years 2/4
Southwest
Year 4
District 7
Year 5
District 7
Year 5
District 4
Year 5
ACCOUNTABILITY
10 • Maintenance mentality
• Discourages overcommitment
• Requires organizational rigor
• Proposed reporting:
• Written report to City Manager quarterly
• Creation of Mobility and Infrastructure
Subcommittee – Quarterly meetings
SPENDING PLAN
11 • Money spent as needed
• Fewer projects go through detailed design
• Fewer projects delayed
• Build bench of on-call contractors to support
smaller projects
• Much more flexibility
• Much faster delivery
• Better planning for funding design, then
construction in subsequent years
REQUESTED FEEDBACK
12 • Spending allocations based on anticipated
budgets
• Programmatic view vs. annual view
• Accountability proposal