Attachment 10 - DRB Resolution No. 18-984 — Santa Rosa City Council, June 3, 2025

RESOLUTION NUMBER 18- 984

RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA

ADOPTING A MHIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE DDTTON AVENUE

RESNENCES PROTECT, ALSO KNOWN AS THE VIBE APARTMENTS, LOCATED AT 3150 DUTTON AVENUE APN: 0434334113; FB. E NUMBER DRI] - 074 WfINRFAS, the EnvimmnenW Coordinator has conducted an bifial study w the possible environmental impaar of Me proposed Dutton Avenue Ru ideoces project, heated at 3150 DentonAvenue, tumbling of 101 -unit mulfi- family, residential development on a 5.95- ansiteraluiriogBeam Review, ( Pjeer), which study was mmpind September 21, 2018; and
WHEREAS, the noted Maly, in its fiml form, did not identify any mguficam effects an Me wv" vonment which would result from the proposed Pmja- t provided certain Mitigation snare thereto identified and listed Were adopted and implemented as part of Me approved Fnrja ad
WHEREAS, theEnvirmmienalCourdmator, baud on theinitial Study, debnninedthat any potential envhmunmal effects of Me prMoselProject w be mifigned by the identified mitigation memme to the point where no significant ® viro®® taI eRttts would ocav and Me Environmental Coordmmm, based upon this delamination, prepared an Initial StudyWfilmal Negative Decimation ( MD) for Me proposed Pmj¢ a; and
WHEREAS, a ounce of Me MND was thereaRa duty posted on September 28, 2018, through October 18, 2018, and an oppoMnmity for comments from the public was provided; and WHEREAS, the DCsiga Review Board of the City of Same Rosa has reviewed and considered Me eovimnmental lady, Me findings ad detambation of Me Environmental Coordinator, Me Initial Study, the proposed hTitigated Negative Declaration dated September 27, 2018, attached hereto and ivmryomtd herein as Exhibit A, the MIT regime, oml and Written. and Me comments, stmanenls, and other evidencepresentedby A permincluding members of Mepublic, whoappearedad addressedMeDesignReviewRota atMepublichearingheld on October 18, 2018, and all comments and materials submitted prim Manor; and WHEREAS, MeDeign ReviewBoardhasbe( it all of thenecessary, environmental info ation requiredby MeCaliforniaEnvirominal Quality Act( CEQA) to properlyamlyee and CValuate eny and all of Me pomMal MVIMMMW impacts of Me pmpnud PmjecL NOW, THEREFORE, BE R RESOLVEDthattheO ign ReviewBomdof MeCity of Sana Rosa, basil upon the findings and the record and files herein, mal the findings above made, hereby determiner that Me proposed Dutton Avenue Residences will not have a significmt effect upon Me enviro® ent provided Me mitigation Mumirus listed and identified in Me MND areimpl® entadM part of Me appmvd Projan, and hereby, approvesmadadopts MeMitigated Negative Declaration for Me Duran Avenue Residences project.

The Design Review Board father finds that Me MND, including Me Ittihad Study, re0ects the OBien Review Board' s vWepeod¢ntjudgmmtad analyas. Tire Design RCVI¢W Attachment 10
Bond stow thatWeDiregor OfPlaning andEconomicDevelopmwtis thecustodianofrewrds of the fi c lugs upon which We Design Review Board' s decisin adopting the MND is basil and Wee these materiels m located in the Depvwwt ofPlaming and Economic DevelopmnvL Room3, SarnaRosaCity HaR, loo SantaRosaAvwua Swm Rosa, Califamia.

BE Tf FURTHER RESOLVED, Win We Design Review Board approves and adopts the mitigation measures ser forth in We NhUgatiw Monitoring and Reporting Program dind Oeoba XX, 2018, atmchdhereto and inwrpomtd hewn as Exhibit B, and dlmts staff, as theau idwfifie, in impl® wt and complete the progrm as pen of We approvd Projx REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED by We Design Review Bond of the Ctity of SestaRosaon this le dayofOcmber, 2018, by Wefollowing vote:

AYES: ( 6) Cbmw Michael Bach; Vice Chair Wares Hdgpetl; Board Members Sabra Brise, Eric Goldschlag Swtt Kincaid, Drew W691
NOES: ( 0)
ABSENT: ( 0)
ABSTAIN: ( 1) Boad Member Kevin Zucca
Ap vd:

B Cheri(
F Int A— Darton Avwue Residwces htifiel Study/ Mifigind Negative Declamfion EAulnt B— Du00n Awxim Residence MiUphon Monitusing ald Reporting Program Resolution No. 18- 984

Page 2 ends

Cityof
SantaRosa

OEVELOP EN

DUTTON AVENUE RESIDENCES
3150 Dona Ave
Assamr s Panel No.: 043- 133413
Lmtml S[ a0yM UIIate Negative D¢ lantioa
1 Agm y:

C4ofSmte Rosa
Plm g mmic Derelo tDepa. mmt
100 Smta Rosa Ave., Rm 3
Smte Rosa, CA 95400
Co . Pamck Sneein, SmPlm
Date: September 27, 2018
0rtyntaof
Rosaa
DATE: SrytembQ 27, 2018
TO: Public Agencies, Oigamimtions and lute ed Patties
FROM: Fa Strsts, Senior Pimmc
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PUBLIC REVD: W AND DI' I' P.N'I' TO A " AM GATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DV NAVENUE RF Mm CES - 3150

DUTTON AVENUE, SANTAROSA, CA
Pussuamto die Sure ofCaliGmia Pubo and Me" Guideliaam forhWbmeou0un of the Califomu Envimmramul Quality Ada 1970" as mrvaded m date, this is to advise you dudthe Depntmmt of Community Develapmmtoftlse City ofSmu Rosahasryryared anIntel Studyon the following pmjct
Project Name:

Dunn Avenue Residences
Lo® Bon:

The sire band on do conside ofDunon Avenue, appmxirmtely CCOft souW of dm, intmssti0n of Be0evue Avenue and Duvm Avenue. The site address u 31M Moon Avenue, Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, C tbmia
APN: W3- 133- 013
PropeM Do p0m:

Thesubjec[ property t5 95 amenw size, am, udevelopd land wiW miwmal on-sirevegeteM1on. No impmvmaents have been node m the site. The sire is surrounded by st m mil, and developd pmp es.

Laud use and Zoning:

ThepJct siteis dsigmtd asMdiaamDensityResid®tiel 8- 18rmiiml muvde dmSameRosa Genets Plan 2035, ad zoned R - 3- I8.

ProjectD npOon- General:

The proposed 3150 Duron Avenue development is a multi -f ly r® deoual community consisting of IM apemnmtuwts. The alurmrents will inclde 33 one-bdroom b4twubedroom ad 10 Wrs- bedroom metswihm fivebuadivga. Ancillaryon- site usesforthe benefit of toanb lifestyleconsett of a leasing otfiW int cafe, clubhouse, cummmiryItimben, wine momge, fimen center, outdoor recreeuooareamcludm8a swimmmgpool, BBQa fireplace, andbocceball crewanda canuumry garden- 237 spacesparting spaceswill beprovided, 101of which are mveral spaces, and 102 bicycle Sromge spaces.

Enti0ement Applications from the IdfY M Snnh Roe:

APplicaAom necessary for the processing of the Duma Avenue Developmat Milect in the R-} 18 dismet with the city of Sem Rosa are:

Design Review
EnHroamemal Ines
The pmpo pmJct would not sesuh in potentially sgwficaet impazb that commit be miugmed to Ievel Of
iumcnificmce.

ThelvimSatl30ftiC NpauveDeclmatio
QditenOiCEQtcowappr
paredin; meIn
alwish
SauonIx! N
umve
Califomiano11mnenWQualityAG (CEQA). Powhetmme,theIvivalgwneloleredNegativeDslaetimwillernessthernya respmal
AMINcYrcedocumentrequiredurtdaCEQAfmmypamirettappmvahrequestbyaresponsibleagency.

A 20d y( Mmty- y) public review period shall commerce oo Senbmba 28. 2018. Wmten comments must be sat to We Ciry of SantaRosa, Commvuty Development DePewment, Planning Division, 100SameRosaAvenue, Room3, SantaRoseCA 95402by October18. 2018 TheCiry of SantaRosaDesigpReviewBandwi11holdpublicbearingson theItti4a1Smdy/MiugatuiNegative Declareuoo and project maitsm October 18 .2018 mora8a4: 30p. m. mmeCiry Cououl Chambers, City Hall, IW Santa Rosa Avenue, Sama Rose. Correspondence and commeab can be delivered to Patrick Siremer, Semar Planner, phone:() On S 1323, emad: PBlreetena. srcib'. ora RNVDtONMRaff LCHECKLIST

1. Project Title: 3150Dunon Avenue Residrnces

2. Lad Agency Name & Address: City of SantaRasa Planning& E mic R iopmew Department
10o Santa Rosa Ave. ( P.O Bax 16] 8)
Sana Rosa, CA 95W2- 1618

3. Contact Person & Phone Number: Patrick Stseemq Senior Planner Phone Number: ( 101) 5434323
Email: PStreeleyaorcityom

4. Project Lmamm: The site is lorstd in the City " F Rom, Sonoma County, Cahli mia at 3150 Wtton
Avenue, Sena Rase, Calimmut
APN: 0434334113

5. Project Sponsor' s Name & Mmk M. Gamy, Prnw as
Address: Paladin Funding Inc.
430 Ridge Road
Tbuma CA 94920

6. Projwr Lend Use Consultant: lean Kzpol[ hok
J. Kapolchok& Associates
843 Second Street
Sana Ross, CA 95W4

1. General Plan: Medium Desony RaWatial: 8- 18umuAacre

8. Zoning: R3- 18

9. Description of Project
The pmposed 3150 Dunon Avenue development is a multi- fumily residamal community consisuo80[ IM eparbvwtatria. TheaPerm.enawi8 include33aoo-bedmom64two-bNmoni aN 10thrw- bMmomunitswithinfiveb
in8s.

Aoe,
clonsiteusesfo
Web
UWtofbe
swearslifestyleconsistofarrecretionsons clubhouse, Pont,mmuWtyeen, fi wire storage, limasamrer,outdooratygarea237dgaaarkiRgpUD mea,fimplace, whichaballwunaedaaml102iicycle M231
spacer Pinking specawi0 be pmvidal, 101 of
which are wverd spaces, and 102 bicycle smmge spazes.

Appheaman oecasmy fm pmcasing of the 3150 Dunes Avenue Raidauzs in the R- 3-18, Medium Density District are:

Dai Review: Medium Denary MWa- Family Revdentisl Apmmwa ere epemtined use w the R- 3- 1 % woivg distiicc

10. Sonoauding Land and Land uses:

The site, located on the msside of Mason Avenue, appmximmely 440 R south of the intemecti su of BellevueAvenue and Lotion Avenue, is sitmoodin a mixcl- useareaconsistingof fight industrial and multi- family residmtial uses. Industrial wamhouse usesare to W mnM and sou0t of the subject pmPeny: Dutton Avenue and vaemnl M dnms Density Residcmial dmignmM and zntel land is m the west', Smoma Matin Area Rail Transit ( SMART) not nasi" and single- story, attached, low to medium density tcsidmtisl areto the eau Il. Owes public Agendes Whose Approsal is RegairN:

City ofSmW Rosa Building Depmmtm
CityofS Rosa Eo® ue gDevdWmmt Division
Cityof Santa Rom Fin: Defermam

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Project Dexrlption

2. Environmental Factors PolenfiaRv Affeoletl
J. Evaluating of Emiroumemal Impacts
L Aerflefics
H. Agricultural and Forested Resources
M. Air Quafin
N. Rialogiral Resources
V. Cultural Resource
W. Geology and sous
VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Vm. Havrds and Hazardous Materials
M Hydrolo®' and Water Qualty
X. Land Du Planning
M. Mineral Resources
XH Noise
XHL Population and Housing
W. Pubfic Sersicea
W. Recreation
WE Tramportafionrfralfic
XVH. Editors and Service Svstems
win. Mandatory Findings of Significance
d. Source Davments

5. Applimot' s Signature and Determination
5 L PROTECT DESCRIPITON
W91
Thesubjectpropertyis15.95acresin sizeandidentifiedasAssessofsParcelnumber0l3-1334)13.

Prior to mneaatim to the city of Santa Ross, the site was created by a ruiner suhdivisim ( Parcel Map # 6353, September1980). Thesiteis looted unUtesouthwestquadrantofthe City OfSaw Rosa, m the east side of Damn Avenue, approximatelyq & mudo of the interseotim ofBeUcv Ave eaod Avmue. Thewmisacc offofU oAvrnue. TheaMtecsis3150 Conon Avenue, Santa Rosa
Topography and Nataeal Feature:

The subjectproperty is Fla, undevelopedland with mxurnal m- w vegemwa No impmvemmts have been made to We site. The site is by slRCl tail, and developd properties. surrounding Land and Land Uses:

The site is located on the cast side of Dutton Avenue appmearomely 400 R somh of the intersectiw of Bellevue A%enue and DormerAvenue_ The panel is amwrdN by mu ofivdusurial and residential land uses. Buttress Pack development ensu maniaand souda ofths site; Dutton Avenue arrestsieapmvemwts and vacant milium density residential land and Storage Mauer self storage is to the ween SMART mJ packs and single- story attached mWti- firmly residential developments are to flue mat
Existing Physical Conditions:

Existing Uses
The site is undeveloped.

Physical Imnmvemmu
The she m excepting a cycloWcyclwe with wood slats fence around the notice perimeter of the property.

Land Use and Zoning:

The project is designated as Medium Dmsiry Residential under We General Plaq and zoned R- 3-

18. Housing densities wohna are Helium Density land Use mu gory range fiom 8.0- 18.0 drips per gross sere. The land use designation and zoning district pearmita range ofhcatong ty including single family attached and multifamily developments, and is imerded for specific areas whine higher density is appropriate_
Project Objectives:

It is rheobjectiveof the3L50 G n Avenw developmentproject to provide the following:

A well-designed1134.154sf mediumdensityresidentialvbrantfdesrylewwnurdry for residents.

A welldesigneA lifestyle community, centered around an active gaWeno¢ area witha swi® mg pool outdoor gathering awl BBQ arms, home ball covet eM open Been space fmrmidanps toenjoy.

A welldesigoed space. which promotes suaataivaleiliryand feather reinforce the senseof community by including common work and leisure spaces such se; health center, intemet cat, communal computer wade spaces, corfereoce name, community lotchen, and a corarrounity garden along the wstem border of proe ,
Awelldesigmed medium density residential development whose residence will become users of public transportation, especially SMART mrd We bicycic/ pedestrian path along toe SMART pain rail mmdor.

Project Description
The pmposd 3150 Damm Avenue development proposes a gatdresideoml commwiry of lo] almmwts. The pamnwu will include 33 one bedroom, b4 two- bdmom, and 10tluee4sdmom will within 5 buildings. The building complex consists of I two- story, 3 three-story, anal 1 meed threead four -tory buih0rrg Ameattesincludea lensingo1fiW intemmraf5 clubhouse, community latcher, wine storage, and fimew; comm as well aspublic pthmvg stances, which incldea swimming pool, BBQ arms, fireplace, modbocce ball arm The mttaoce c the property is offDumn Avenue. Raidwb will mer dm* sots dgmes. There will be votical van pottetiw through elevator anme four- story strucme ami a series of bridges comectiug the buildings to pramote occupancy, by We move down gweratiw of baby boomva.

The project proposes 237 parking spacesw. ate, consisting of 130uocoverd aM 107covered paces Thepmposd 237parking spacesexceedtheCity' s requirementsby 8 spcea In addition. 102 bicycle storage lockers will be provived.

The bAclicep mecomcmpomryin daiga Smog color comost iseaseda provideinterestand ctienlajam Bailding heightsrmW fiom 22& for thetwmsmry building: 32 B. for thetutee -sorry, aod42& forthefour- starypmtimofWe%- smryb drag. Building rnarnials are gamed cmant plasm, HaNie- Bo ml sid'iM metal Manama and standing seam metal mofs. AB mise attenuation nuammoswvendd m the acoustical analysis preparal fur the eject by Illingworth & Rollout will heincopomtd in thetajact designandu madea parthemo of thisproject descriptiao.All puking lot areas will he landscaped according to the city' s Design Guidelines, the mein entry -way will he veolind, ornamental landscaping will be ucd throughout the rcrotiovlpubtic pthmng massata a seriesof communitygardeaplots ate pmvidd alongtheentireamountbouday often l m maty. Sweettreesasroluird by thecity'sRecreationandParksDepartmentwill alsobe pmvidea The Iuniscape plan will comply with the city' s Water Efficient Landscape Oedineoce WELD) tequimmwts. As part of this project dumiptioq the small, iwlatd wadand that countsm the rw pmtim of the property will be completely avoided.

The Pmjm will inmpomte Low Impact D Icgommt( Lm) measures ascaul for in the City of Santa Row' s Standard Urban Stam Water Management Plan ( SUSMP). The City' s SUSMP raryim the intlusim of Lm features to capture ata infiltrate small scam event vulmva on- site.

TheProject's PreliminaryStormWaterManaganm Plm will incopotav LID mwswesintothe Pmjxt design including dmentim and wfdttauw through whmte capture milia miatme under the dminege swalM bra-retwtiom, min gardens, measiled storm water ideas and mmceptor bees Thee femmesaredescnbalmavail in PreliminarySamarWaterMitigatim Planprepaaeaby Adobe & Aawciates
Green Tecbn000ss
Erogy andwaterefficientlerip measureswill beincopowhd thmnglwntthePmjat including the installation of several electric charging stations in the pm6ing area and water efficient asndsepingconsistingof droughttolmnt plantspcies separstdins hydro -zonesfm majatim reds_ Planting plats will wR Portam trm and shrubs to compliment thecommudtygathering ascotandvain entry -way. A commudty gardenareais alsopmvidmL The Projectwill include high efficiencytighm8, andlow -FlowplumbingfaucetsandfixturesTia applicantwill atmutilizea cameanuctionwaste rerycmg pmgtum during rnustrucuommminim ? waste to the extent prscucable.

The 3150 flumu Avenue Project inwrPordes the applicable policy m® sums contained in the Sana Roo Climate Action Plan. These include the following:

Porgy: Comply with CALGrem Tier 1Sundatds: TheProject isdesignedto, comply with State Energy requirements for Title 24, City of SamarRoss' s CALGreen requirements and CALGteen Tic 1 Sbndands in effect at time ofpeotit Such suadmds have ban ivmtpomtedwedsitedevelopmentbuildingdesignandIaMscaping.

Polk 1.1.3: Afia 2020. allnew dexlopmrns witozezuo era elattiary: ThePmjatubeivg incarnated priorm Thzgzo. erefam Itis polity acesoesnot apply.

Policy Real time Elegy Manners: The Project will include energy monitors to walk: energy Use
Polis 1.4.2: Comply with the City' s Trre Preservation Ordinance ( SmmRosaCodeSection lJ-

24. 020: No tree will be rmoved.
theLandscape
Plan,
die
pricaM
privateplanningofancewiothpublouianCadre) shownonthelandscapePlan,theprojectincludestheplantingodoSa,mginoitexttress)andprivateeste). The Landscape design le ci mmpRaaewbh the San. Rosa Zoning Cade, SemaRasa Design Guidelines. and Water Efficient Leodsaepe Continence.

Polis I. S: Iruvll cew sidewalks std paa o8 with hiyp solar re0xtivitY materials: till pmposd new sidewalkq dnvmays modportion auras will be paved with materials that cotmin either color errorbs ennancemenu ro pto. ide eNunced reFlaniry.

Po 13: Pre-wiremd mplumb for sulmgamel mPV systems: This iscurreodYbeing wvesugated and cannot be communed to.

Policy Supports implementation afsuuon plans and terra or plans: The Project is not within a Station Area Plan or wigim a Corridor P1am The Project docs support altemegre modes of warrant by providing 102 bicycle lockers and several elxuiod- vehicle charging stations. It is hoped that addiuooal bus service will be per, ded to this area of the city.

Pow: Provide vo- vu service sucM1as ATMs ordrycleanittg to site users: ThePJxris residential project tool dors not supply such uses. theprovisionofsuchusemaye conflict with the zanwg dis rict
Po: Lnpmve mo- veticWaratwoh eprotwm walking. biking: Thee Jabs deigned to promote walking and biking through the provision of bicycle lrckers, sidewalks and bicycle leads as requited along Duren Avenin. It is a project objective for flearesidrnu in utilize area biry is and pedestrian paths, which mcludcs pedesviambicycle pathway along the SMART comfdor.

Pa: Suppottmia ivae gp dmsiydevelupmwttwar ices: ThePJectiso medhnndensiryresidentialprojectransistrntwi[ Mite CityofSmu RosaGrneml P1mn theR- 3- I8 among district.

Pow: Provideaffordablehousingnnruansit. Theprojectisa mediumdensityresidential rental proJaL The FMM will be repomible for the payment of any required a(IRAsble Iwusing inspect f
Pow: Unbundleparking bom proPedyants' This rneesueis relatedIn alladable housing Pjmv and is therefore not apPlicabbeto the Project
Polis 3A 1: banal calming future mimprovepadesuian/ bke experience: Thee Jmt will be responbleforimprovensmts along its Umoo Avenue 6miege.

Pow: ImPlemanttheBicycle avd PNmtrim MesterPhm: Any regidrM ® provements along Onston Avenue will be dine in axmrdmce with city standards.

Poliev4_11 thrall bicycle parting cunsisent with regdadmc IW bicycle lockerswill be provided. Bicycle parking shall be provided per the city' s Zoning code.

Poy: Provide bicycle safety training m residents andemployees: Polity sommd.

Py: Provide safe spacesto mostfor bus arrival: There is a bus stop withiv o.5 miles of the projeR with sidewalks fm the waiting Patrms-
Polis 432: Work with large employersmporide Meshare programs: TheproJetisamalium dendry iden4al ml. Thupolicy is nalapplicable. However,asareadentialcommunirycar- shadogopportunities may preetthemselvm.

Pow: considerexpardingemployeeprogramspromotingtransituse: Sin cansnsentabove.

Poy: Provide awards for employes baaof alternative cornute options: See comment above.

Poliev 43_5: Hoonmage new employers of 5(l+ provide subsidizxd pansit passe: Sm comment above.

Pow: Pmvrde apacefor addhionalpark andride las: Ttispolicyisnotapplicable.

Pow: Imluden:. tie for employee [hetpromotereleco® utivg: lbis poUcYisrot applicable.

Plis5.12: butallbeprovidedicbn®ngWuiPmeoeSeveraldctriWvehiclescharging atatiam wiu be proviaea m the parking CPKO: Pmvrde alve furls a new
rarea
maemproject. Thfoc, thispolicydnmrotapply. ngstaeovs: ThinPmjmtisrotamfireling Pow: lverease thvmdon ofmnsuuctionwrene: ThecordmMr wiB divertmmumtion waste to the extent commercially practicable andprepre a Comtmeuon Waste Mamgemeat Plan for recycling analdisposal Ofmnsuuction Wane.

Polies ) I- I: Rduu potable order for outdoor land pion the Project landscaping will redone lowwateruseplains Isodscapeariplam will cordondripsystemsusingasnort controller. The Project will be compliant with the City of Sana Rose' s Water Efficient laudxape Ordinaroe WELD).

Puy: UsewmermmerswMehtra- timewateruse. Such miters will be used.

Pam: Meet ov-site metersepatatian reqwrerarnsin ItMrdimvswith cutrmtor fume recycle wear cpabilitin: Thispolirywill be adhered m.

Polw 8. 1. 3: Esablishco= mVgafdemmdabmfarms: Commuwtygatdrnshavehxv incorporwedowntheProjectsdesign, subjectto theapprovalof theSommeCountyWater Agenry.

Pow: Provide outdmr mons for charging lawn equipment: Policy acted- Policy
ctM
Pow: Wsa11 low water use hmdsrepn: Law water use landscapes will be used The Pmjnt will be compliant with the City of Sana Rosa "s Water Efficient Ladscape ONiruxc.

Policv 9.2.1: Mhdmize constructions equipment idling time in 5 window or less: 'The devcloperYmvsructivv mavaner will Medition conractora® Crrtrna to limit com nactim equipment idling fitnc to 5 minutes or less consistent with the City s Standard Measures for AG Quality.

Pow: Maintain concoction equipment per manufacvuersspecifications: The develope seacusnuction mmager will translation contractor egreem® ts in require that Al equipment usedat the site he maintained in accordance with the aanufzcturer' s instructions Poy: Limit GramHouseGasIGHG)mvmmtim equipmmthyusingelaaified aquipmmt or alternate fuel: The developer will include provisions in contractor intactness encouraging the use ofeleconfid equipment or equipment ming altemmive fi Js.

Cimdetion Improvement
As part ofthe Pje the project applicant offits to install all -way atop consols res4ipe the sauthbomd Smvdish Avenue aerials on include a Icy - tum lane and resripe the wntbmmd Tadd Road afiprmch to include a right twit lane n Todd Road/Standish AvenucGLilotti Avenue. An mechmrnt permit will be It d with the County of Sommer for the above described hnpmvemens_ Evdemeofanappmvdencroachmentpetmitw016csubmntr win Cityof Sana Rosa Economic Developmentand Planning Deparmenandthe Building Divi nlri m building permit issuance. The need for said impowement shall he negated if the intersection has beensignalizedor if sipyalbstionisimmdistely 6th coming Construction Schedule
Consrumion world take approximately 18 maths. Contraction is anticipated m begin in the Spring of 2018 and be coraplcld asFall of 2019. External construction woh would be limited to the hours of M AM m 2:00 PM, Mondsy- Fnday, ad 8A0 AM a 6:00 PM on Satudays or as allowed by the City' s Municipal Cede Section I2- 16 030.

Cin of Santa Rosa Enfitlement Appfimdons:

Ikv® iew: MWti-family. d®d pmj= Nl pemdttNosesmdie R-3-I8zo gdis m lL jctwJlrey CEQAmiewmWO pReview. oWy.

ENYfROtbiTAL FAE ORS MUI, ITW. LY AFFECTED
TheenvimmnentalbattleschakecibelowwouldbepotentiallyaRetd bythA pmjwL involving at ton oneintranthatisa "PotentinllySiypifirentImpact" asindicated! bythechecklistonthefollowing page.

Aechedr AgricWoue Ranoutca An Qualiry
Biological Roomca cuburnit Gwlogy lsoJs
Greerarmare Gaa Emisioa HamNs& H mdous Hydrology/waterQuality Materials
Laud Uec/ Plaouing MineralR mcg Nesix
Papulation/ Hoosiug Publics Co Recreation
Tru yottation/ TrePic
SnitNuam/ssace Manilivityulcc
DETERMINATION:

On We to i5 oYWh bipal 5ryay c,ah im:

I fW am WePrrgvat proper COND NOT Us, n sptifionl effort eo in: mvimwxm ai NEenrnvE DEeuanTllxl.; u tr prep: ra.
1Rin OW alFcuathWeproa 1poimwla halenpiirunr Mmmur envirmmmLrMewill mfire,transportanmrMAAinDWIiGsAmeDha
AmisiwDEialM1e
MPmTlmONmivtbepre
ale
byaap¢ Emby
I fiM µyarepropoui prom MAY lane aLgnifiaN effm anthe nwimmL anean E ONIkN MPACT REFORT is rtquimi
I findthattheproposedislandMA Y halea'pNmisallysiyefiont imgxY or' parnriellysipifiemr rias miiped' iarri , Ween5vomnmLint atIesslonechar 1) hasbi ssequaayanelymlin an mlb awvarnl Puroanl to Writ ieable lepl 9aMadaL am ]) hai tress tlAemt hersnarration manoeu Nemliasashon Wehd. ehetti M ENVIXONA@IIAL
IWARMMRT is required lbwAmmwiearly the eRecuroom ranaio in he WWmasi.

I End areathroughdheinstalled Paper laid hart n sigreui eRM an UsemeirnmrnL [ seasonat Onter Ykiss! [ eR GI MIC Mn Mannino tlequadelY in an F 115LELt u NEGAI DEM UM Perot m" ii asic legal somaea, acd th) hale ones awiMl a mitigated Pumum W sort eadia M anNEGAT EDECW DON. incmamg rtrisinns an miliplim mmwte AY art impmN UPonWeP^ 4 ea polm. noNwg finlMumrywi Siguemre
9-a7 aa1tr
Dane

PATRICK STREETER SENIOR PLANNER
14 15
Aauasmenl of Visual Change
Thedegreeof visualchangeasa resultofthe Pjest wasassessdLasedourapplioble city policies; auk de application of visual assessmentmeWndobte, to lizd by the City of Spain Rosa m previous nmegml acsatimeot docummm. Thu assessment is used m assist m We detnuuoation of proposal aesWnk itrpam In addition, an Academic Analysis based m the CBQA Chmklpa Prepared by Boulder Associates, Architects was used to same; potential aesd nic impacts. ( Spume IJ) Applicable Gmaal Plan Policies
The General Plan policies related m visual quality me fomd m the Urban Design and Ttaosporratim elements ofde General Plan. The gspticable policies are:

U0. A: PreserveandenhanceSantaRosa's sceniccharacter, including its naturalwaterways, hillsides, and distinctive districts.

UD - A - I: Whomin view mrtidms in, ramal ridgelutes and landmark: such as Trylm Mounting and Bataan Mmmeiu
1 A-2: Somtglhea soft emphasize community focal points. visual ladmarka aM fmNrts for conlribum Wthe identity ofSmm Ross using design concepts and standards implemented through the Laung Code, Design Guidelines, Preservation Dishier Plans. Some Road policies, the Dowgmwa Statim Ara Specific Plan, and the Citywide Creek Mater Plan. 16 PoleniallN LcvsThan- Leu- Thao- No
Significant Significant Significant IMPael
Impact xith Impact
ifigafionIncorporated
I. A nS TICS
Would theproject
a Have a substantial adverse efiat on a
scent vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic rewmtq
including, but not limited to, man, sock
oummppings, sod Impose buildings
within a statescmic highway^
c. SuhsmtiallY de@ade We exiting vimal
character or quality of the s¢ ad its
surroundings'
d. Create anew source oflight
or glare which would adversely affect
day or nighttime views in the area?
Aauasmenlof Visual Change
The degreeof visual changeasa resultoftheP jest was assessdLasedour applioblecity policies; auk de applicationof visual assessment meWndobte, to lizd by the City of Spain Rosam previous nmegml acsatimeot docummm. Thu assessmentis usedm assistm We detnuuoationof proposal aesWnk itrpamIn addition, an AcademicAnalysisbasedm the CBQA Chmklpa Preparedby Boulder Associates, Architectswas used to same; potential aesd nic impacts. ( SpumeIJ) Applicable Gmaal Plan Policies
The GeneralPlan policies relatedm visual qualityme fomdm the Urban Designand Ttaosporratim elements ofde General Plan. The gspticable policies are:

U0.A: Preserveand enhanceSantaRosa's scenic character, includingits natural waterways, hillsides, and distinctive districts.

L A- g. MamnivhJlsidwmWecityuascenic backdropaurban dmelopmmt.

T-Q: Identify, prererve, andenhanrescenicmadsthmughot SantaRosam hoh mnl anddeveloped T- G5: Retainexistingv andvegemuonalong scenicroads, asposaW Enhanceroadway appearance through land aping, scans mauve Plant mmmial.

T- G- h: Provide large setbacks fiom scenic roads, as possLle, to avoid enmoachment of buildings on the view of the madway.

T- Q-2: Providebikewaysalong scmic roads, whererightrof- way existsm whereits acquisium monran jmpadize roadway charmer.

T-0 Disallow on- egeet parkng along scenic mads.

Vi A. avaammt MCMdolo¢ v: In order to assessvisual change, Gctws or` categofia" and ways by which to omwre change within Woe sdected mtagorim were cslodd herL The catmonaesu to assets visual change:

L Vi Con= tb = nexistingcondiuonsaodpost- pmjmt

2. Se viewob wn.

3. Degadviotr of@e user' quatiryofWe veer
a. An innuselolight and glare Wertwows rovlt inesafety Mmndm nuisancemswumding lend naw
The avers ofempluyd to determine impact:

1. Viu Con Swog VisualCmn twoWdes ifW Mjecl tali
Lineof Jmridgelineisaltere " a tmosislmwi smroun i gridgelinm.

MinorMgnmlorweaarfeedInconsistent oflarwiW
omaurecmaapechv
ser.

Ealeadnexalandsmperextmelyhoabyaxpoorithiswremovdofvegmtion. Smle and massofprojmtis gmslY ivmmPauble wiW Wesuuoutrdivg mvimrmenL

2. S^...:^ Vkm Obstruction:
slogxcticnofferockdamiddlegroundviewsofscerdcesizamissuchassregtslopes,distinctiveronces. ps, ptummwenidgelivqmaturestandsofwtive,heritagemvavml ® Dues ofem.

3. Degadaionofvisual Qua4ry-
Severe altentlonar duplacementafscmic view- shams.
q. LiyJumd Glare:

Ctemioviewswmumeofsuhstmtial lightorglere, adversely aRctingdayw dghWroenews oftlm area
Disetrrmm.

1. (a) No Impact: The project site is zood Mulfi- Family Residential; I8- uWWacre ( R-} 18) and designated! Medium Density Residential in WeCity' s General Plan.

The project is sitnatd in a mud Ind use mea of establish hhdustriabbustteta park development, establishes] single -spry attachd multi - family residential ad 315.61 undevelopM acres platmd 6r milium densityresidentialanda small mail commercialarea The subjectproperty ad Surrounding area areecseodnRy Rat. The Poir t site is not locatd within a designated scenic condor or scertic visa area ad would therefore nm visually conflict with any major or minor ridgelme: obstruct a f r egmundor ent ground view of any designmd scenicresoumGw, deeg.adeor displaceascenic view shed The Project will have no subsmtial adverse effect on a scenicvisna Rcommeodd Mitigation Measurer: No mitigation rtquited.

L ( b) No Impact The subject property is without vegetation, accepting oamilly, occurring emud gooses -There are no neighboring swoic resources annealing tock oweropping or historic buildings.

The Project is not locmd along a scenic highway The Project will have oo substmnd adverse effect Reeommmdd Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required.

1.(q Les than Significant Impact: Che Project is sieved between the 13.95 -acre Oak Mmmr Industrial Pah mod a similar wecl similarly developed wdustr d pmi--. acmt lad and Stange Maser Self Storage is across Dupont Avenue to the west; the SMART rail tracks seal single -story, attachd multi -family exinmthe eatt Thepmjatsiaiswith tvegmationoWmthannaemellyoccumng amudgrasses_ The Projectwillit meabuildingformadheightstlutaredistinctlydifferentthen the esising, built ensvirmi However, bard on existing Comenl Plan and main& the Prjeer is the Rrstofseverd melimv density residential projects plamd for the area In older at achieve densities requbd by theGeneralPlan andzoning district oo hiple sorrybuilding will be mluhd. Giventhe fisting context and pmjectd usesfor the area, the fact that meProject is Subject to Design Review Boal review and most therefore demonstrate superior design, the Project will have a less them Significant impact on We existing visual character and quality of the site ad its sunouodings.

Recommended Mtigation Measures: No mitigation requhed
Standard Conditions of Approval:

The site shill be developd consistent with the active of the City of Sana Rosa Design Review mart

1.( d.) Less dun Sigdficanp Exterior lighting andl he accomplished tuough a combination of buildingmound soffit ad waittights, illuminmd bollards, ad pole -mountedfutures. Parkinglot lighting rill be illumlmtd to phmide a fest- cradle lesl b moon o.5 and 10 All fixtures shell be a cutoff -type to the men the mluirements ofCalGtren building standards code. Each tight fivnoe shill bedirctd downwardandawayWin adjawn propertiessuchthatnoon -ate light fixnuedirectly 10 ilbmmates an area off -sive. The photometric analysis( Source 6) shows mm too tight spillover at the goperty edges Given the absence of light intrusion, the pmjw, sI tial to create a new source of whstm Tallight m glare, adversely aRecting day or nightnme views ofthe area would be less than significant
Racommmded Mitigation Measures: Noce required
Sources: 1, 2, 3, 6, 5. 6, 7, 11 .

Comment The Project has the potential to imput the existing watal character of the sunoanWog properties and add a new source ofUgW and glare. However, whomuniformly applied development policies an, nandmds set (oath in the Geral Plan and the City of Santa Rosa Design Guidelines are applied to the Pmjm% the potential ivWact is less than significant The Santa Rase General Plan 2035 EM deerminel Wat the implementation of the SantaRosa Gcmaa Plan 2035( of wbicb the Project is mnsistmtwith) alongwith potentialdevelopmentin thesimmmdingregionwouldnotbeexpectelm reauftin curatfirtwe impact to visual remmcec Per Table 2- 1Sammary oflmpecta and Mitigation Measures for Pmpoaed SeamRoea Geral Plan 2035 (GP Elft Table 2- 1) Kd, the impact was found to be Less than Sigrificant The Project has been farad W have m Aesthetic impects IW
FatentiallY LessThan- Ln Than- % o
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact wiN Import
MitigaYonIncorporated
it. AGRICIILTUREANDFORESTRESOIIRCES
Would the pjme
a. Comer Pnme Famdavd, Uwque
Farmland. or Farmland of Smtewide
hnprrmnce ( Famdand), as shown on We
maps prepared pursuant to the Famdand
Mapping and Noniroring Program of
the Califomia ResourcesAgency, an
mom agricuihwal use?
It. Conflict with existing zoning fw
aculmmse l u, or a Williamson Act
El 11contract.

C. CooRict with existing zoning for, w
munt ordng of forem land ( as
defined in Fuhlic Resources Code
section 12220(8)). wattedand( as
defend by Public Resources Code EI
secuoo 4526), or motherland mind
Timberland Producli m fas defend by
Government Code section 51104(g)) 9
d Reodt in the loss of lorrat laM or
uuconversionofforrslandmvon -forestLI 1-1 El
n Involve udrer changes in the existing
nvment whkh due to groin location
or muni could result in colmpsion of
Farmland to ram- agricWmral use?
Discutdon:

D. utode
SImpact
Nit farmland ddenttutd `
dime'.'
OfMappingapinImportancetoing
Prograuexist
withintheSamsrcescitylimitsieidwdfidlorheFarmlandMappingnAtcontract, PmgmmofCalifornia Re=vurces AgeocY. The project sim u not uodwa Williamson Act contract, nor would the pojecternmidmdfymy
Ag
ultumll sincevw
cityrwmea
ThwSRosa20idanymlPlmricesnmidrndfyanysindiclmmllandwisisthecoylimitswtheUrbanGmwdlBoundaryGGBI. re. pjectixwithindoCitylimits, asisthesurroundingUdx. Theewillbenoimpacttoagriculture.

Recommendd Midgafion Measurer: No mitigation required
20 S res: I, Z, 1&
Comment The Yrgecthas been frondm havem direct, idi or comwative impact m Agricw 21 Discussion
The Project is located m the San fraaiun Bay Area Air Basin Ambient ab quality smzm for this area have been established at both dm State and fdetal level. The Bay Area mats all ambient aur quality smodsedswith the erceptim oftommal- level ozone, rapimble laniculare caner ( PMID) ami fine Inarticulate matter( PM2. 5).

GrourW- level6 ne: FBghoa le ce = ca bythecmoulativeemissionsoft fiveorgaoic Sales ( ROG) and wtm8m oxides (n' fh), Tlxse precursor pollutantsreact under cermw meteorological wMitionsto form high ozone levels. Controllingthe common; or these precursor pollutantsis the focusof rhe Bar Area's attemptsto reduceozone levels. The highestozone levelsin the Bay Area is mtheeesemandsoothemi levelsaggraryto aredowvars[ ofaupoBunotsources. SmutRosarentor, ata
chisarea. High ozonelevelsag® avam resphmnryand cardiovauulmdiseares, redactlong function, aM' vmrmse coughinganal chat discomfort
22 Particulate Manes Particulate matte is asmher problematic ah pollurarn of the Bay Ams. Particulate matter is assessed and mossured in trtms of respirable particulate matter or particles that have a riamdw of 10 micmmeers or less ( PMIO) and fine pertculne owner where particles have a diameter of2. 5 micaometers or less (PM2. 5). Elmted wscefitrtion ofPMIO and PW1 5 are the rmult of both region - wide ( or cumulative) miations and bcdiud emieao n. Mgb particulate matter levek aggravatemipiratory andwcfiaa talardismiss, malucelung fimctioa iammse mortality (e.9, lung cauccr), andresult w reduced lung function growth in childtm Toxic abcostamioaots ( TAC) are a broad class of compounds known to cause mabidiry mmorufiry usuallybcausedwycausecancer) andinclude, bararecanBmitedto, theairpo0marnslis[d above. TACs arefound in ambient an, espedaRY in aslant areas, and are caused by industry, egimdtme, fowl wmbustioq andcommereial operations (e.g., dry clwfiers). TACs are typically food m low concwuadons, evennearthesource (e.g., dieselpmVculawmanorweara freeway). Because choaic exposure ran result in adverse h ffi eRmta, TAC are regulaml at the negionA state, and Federal level. Diesel eaduust,d bed asdiesel pmocWme nuoser or DPM, is the pnedomimat TAC in tram ab aed is mtimatad to fquesent aboutthtw- quanws ofdw c® cm risk Boar TACs( baaM an the BayAtesavenge). AccordingtotheCaifowia Air gesoncesBond (CARB), dieselcAtmslis a complspminoreofgasavaporsasciBoepanicles. Thisof eutymakesWeaulcxhfiofhwlaswawa , andfitinsela] n ya
complspenproveissue. SomeofwTACsbytlmdieselandamsuchasbenasmeandnterunhyde, statesPrpreviouslyidentifiedasTACsbytheCARB, anderefis[dasceogram; eiWdunderthestaralProposition amansrofder
eFederalHuardooAiraPollutants;
program; CAREhuadoptedcodimplwnentfaowberlatory
rioas
forsfecmuryaodmnhcatsaucesseftruc"emissionofDPM. SeveralofM emnegdamryprogramsafiedmediumafidhwry- dmydieselucluciWatrepresentthbalktiortemission )ruCdifomiahighwnds.iLeuregulationincludethesolidwsnewBstaun vehicle ( S CARole,
is- use publicand utility Bees, asci
thehwvY-0urydieselnockandbarrecdctoryIn200g,CARBapprovedanewregdarionmreduceeoisaonofDPMandvvelanudesBoarspecifican-foredohavytydispelfueledv2014a.The regulationnluirw ffiessl
w1racsm
spedspecifice2010ancereearwagmberweerndentand2023, withal) rmsandieselvehiclesrequiredplhave
2o10ooddeperseogises or equivalent by
82023.

ThaerrydremannsarephaisdinoverthetrompkmcepmntanddependonthemodelyearofWevehicle. A similarpmgram applies m wnsfiucrion quipmmt Bmtt The Bat, Atm Air Quality Management District ( BAAQMD) is the agency nuked wtiWmanagwg air quality in the region. At WeStonelevel, the Caldomia Ab Rmurces Board (CARE) ( apartofthe Ca .forma Evvimomwtal Paaacoon Agency) oversew regimW addiaorwt aztivitim and regulates an quality & the StareImk In lane 2010, BAAQMD adoptedthresholdsofsignificarne to waist in We rn ofpmjwb under CEQA- Theo thresholds were desigsal In mtabBsh t keel at which BAAQMD believed aurpoUttfiart emissions armywase significant wvimms® taI impacu coder Ore Califomu Envimmtental Quality Act ( CEQA) ard were posted on BAAQMD' s webshe and included in the Air Districts updated CEQA Guidelines. The significance tlualmlds idmdfiel by BAAQMD represonacunsevativeeppmazhend are useduaguidelioe mthis analysm. The BAAQMD thresholdof sigwfiwMe is 2,000averagedaily trips. As deermined by thetraffic analysispreparedfor tin Projectby W -Trans, wnsalangtrufficarguments, tbepmjwtedaveragedailytripsis 712nips This fiumber is far below We Wteshold established by de BAAQMD.

ImpactsBlAI.QWasSigdlimstImpact. TheBayAraAuQrdeMei"aofDistrict(BisuamyCEQA Ab Qulity Guidelines ( Guidelirws) set faM criteru for detumining a Rojen' s cofiastduy wOh the BayAm 2010 Cimv Ak Plan (BAAQMD 2011). Per the Guidelintes, the BAAQMD M
considers the Project consisted with the Clean Ar Plan if it I) can be ouclWN that aProject suppntm dueprimary goals of the Plan (by showing that the Project would not result in significant and unavoidable au quality folders); 2) adudes applicable control mesavres from the Plat. and, l) does trotdisrupt or hula implernemtion of my Plancoeval mensure. Theprimary goalsofd e2010 Clean Air Plan arena potet sit quality. public holth, and the climate. The Plan includes 55 ` control as five categories: swioery and wrensource; mobile spume; transportation mmol; bed use and local impact; and, rangy add climate. Thee commitit measures are amended] to:

Redone euwvora arMdmesse ambiart wdcedvatiovs of hmmfid ponuovb; withaemphasisphasiconprowlingexpdsmeto
mosthlnams
rhe pox dwgoadestheaands
withangnoonp (GHG)thecom
topesmostecitatly
unpmtedbyairpollution; espy
Reduce greenhdux gaz( GHG) miadma to protect the climem. ( Sec Sctiov Vn.) The Bay Area is considered a moo-aatainmmt ownsfor ground -level cone and fee particulate maner( PM2. 5) miter both the federal Clem Air Act and the Celifomia Clean Ar Act. The was is considered ramatimmu et her respirable particulates or particulate mann with a diamma of less than 10 micrometers ( PMI O) order the California Clan Au AM but nm the federel wt. The redhasavaicedboth Sameandfalasl ambler au quality standardsfor carbonmonoxide As pan of an effort In amain andmaintain ambient an quality standards for ozone and PMI O, the BAAQMD hasestablishedthresholdsof significance for aupollmor malongwith screening Crumia Thew thresholds and soeening criteria apply for dome precursor polhitm ( RQG and NOx), PMIO and PM2. 5 and apply to both construction period and operational period impacts.

In their 2010 update to the CEQA Air Quality Guidelu ec BAAQh4D identified duesizes of various land use for which emissions would be below the BAAQMD significance thodsholds for both construction related exhaust and operation emissions. In Section 3: Screewng Criteria; Table 3- I, the operational criteria pollutant screening sire for apartment 11mvrise is 451 Ac The proposed 107want development is wen below this threshold.

The Project would ret result in a significant and unavoidable av quality impact; would rot expose the community to answer healthmiss sterotng hoe exposure anan ponutmts; aal. would assist m reducingGHG envisions throughits inclusion of greenbunking designmodesmoandthe incorporation of all applicable Santa Rosa Cllmeo Action Plan Policies.

Recommended Mitigation Measures: Now defame.

III ( d) Less than Significant Impact: The Project would pot excd commuction related impacts bead on the significancetablesestablishedby the HAAQMD. Thedosshold establishedfor low -rix apartmentlanduta is451oris Therefrom. sensitiverecegorsincludingemployeesin theneighboring business parks and residences to the eat would armbe exposed to mins mind Pullman comrntmtlods.

Reemmentletl Mifigedod M1leasures: Nom rtgrtiraL
Standard Conditions of Approszl ( COA)
Although theProject isbelow thesignificance thresholdsestablishedby theBAAQMD, the following Standard Conditions of Approval shun be added to the Project cons itioosm aware comphawc with Best Management practices.
24 Consistent wiWthe Bas Mawgemeot P fiti the followings aria shall be incosPoreted into moslmctiw comsxa and spmifiwaons Lm Wegojmc
AB exposed surfima( e.g_, parting arem singing mons, mil piles, graded arms, and unpaved aams roads) shall be waved two fi a per day aod/a toxic soil slabaiaas shall be applied.

ABhandsome" unsporting and, MA orotherloosematerialoff-siteshallbecovered.

All visible mad or din uncked ben onto adjacent Public road shall be swept daily.

AR roadways, driveways, and sidewalks m be Paved shall be m Ieted as soon as possble lMkivg padsshallbehadassoonaspossibleaftergradinguoless; selling or soilbunionsam usedIdlingdmcashallbemmimiudmiabyshumngequgmmtoffwhmmtmoorreducing da maximum idling tim
25minutes(
asraCWebytheCalifomiaaRI)o
Citoxics
shmeawue Title 13, Smtim 2485 ofCalifwtda Code ofAegulatioos [ CCR]). Clwrsigoage shelf bepmvidedfwcxluicernwohesatalfacupoints. nanismr'ssp
iipm
ocm. llllequipmentsandpropeckedbylymeccoNmmewiWmanufacturer' s spaifiwtiora. All equipment shall be checked by a cenified mmhmic and detmninN ro be mooing iv Pmptt caMitim poor to opandw.

Apubticly visible signshall bepmtMwiththe telephonen mberaod mnam ivfo me0w for the d® gmtM on- site mmvucnon mamga avaJeble ro razive ardre ond to dust complaints.

Phispm'onshallrepentallmmpkdotsbtheCtityofSanaRasaandtakeimmNimeTheactionssoonrineambersnotminethenblhoursaftertheianl mureceivedltmBAAQMD' s phone number shall also be visible to ensure campliantt wrth applicable reguhdiosa.

0.( el less Wan Sigoifinot lmPaa. TMP jst would Bmaare lowlizede®. ssuosoCdidel and nonhxaeexhamtu= tocobyadjvequipmmtopafovwcvndtmckculdbelThesernocafindgnsmrybemeoftleBomtimreotaelaoawmreceptors.Bowever,iheewouldbeluncodrusedthe woofthe.
ne mintlikelytoadverselyamypeopleoff-sirebynnomriginmnould coder
mmplaiuts.Thepmjmtuinthkefynincludemysewouldbeoiftcmtodorsthenwouldwasemmplaintsfieguladomdiogacs¢AuyPmnuafue° wauduits. uvedtocompfYwithallriry. sateand FNeml rgWaeon as part ofsravdetd pemumog pmeMurrs.

Recommended Mlfigatien Mmum: None reluited.

Soarces: 1, 2, 5, 8, 9.

Comment: The Projmt has been found to be well below the Bay Area Air Quality Management Disbies air cloddyimpactthresholdandlas ineogo all maodatoryGHGMeasuresfoundis the City of8aaa RosaClimateActionPlan- Thcpotentialrens qua4ryimpactsdosingmmoucumm adequately addressed through the appRmti000fSmoderd CoiMitiom ofAppmvaL Said Standand cooditiomof Approvalimplementa qualityaudclimmechangepolicimfomafinGmeml Plan2035.

UponcertificationofNe General Plan2035EIA, the CityCm dadaptedasatemmtofovemding wmideation as regard cumulative ahquafiry impacts Given the cowsimcY ofthe Project with the General Plm m funher miti%auoo meaane is tapr'ud. 11a PmJmt has been fomM m love m Am Quality irrroacts.
25 Potential Leo- Than- LassThaa- No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact win Impact
NutigatiInrarpontei
W. BIOLOGICALBESOURCBS
Would the project:
a Have a substantial adverse effect. either
direNyorthroughhabitat
modifications, on any species identified
as a candidem sensitive, or special
setas species onlocal or regional plans
policies, or regulations, or by the
ofFishmal
Wildlife or US. Fish and Wddlife
Wildomia
US.

Service?
b. Have a submntial adverse effect m my
riparim babitat orother seosi ive uamml
community idenfified in local or
regional Plans, palicim rcgWatimv or
by We Catili mia Depvmn¢ offish
and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
C. Have a mbsmotial adverse effect on
federally Pmremed wedavds as defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
6N ng but not limited to, marsh,
mal pool, misml, etc.) through direct
mova. filling, bydrolopcal
nmmmnion, Or other mwm7
J, laterf subsrmaly wiw the
insevemeaw of my neve resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or
win established native resident or
migratory wildlife condors or impede
de use of were wddlife nursery siusl
e. Copilict with any local policies or
ordinances pmtectim biologid
restannu , such as a tree Preservation
policy or ordinance?
f Cori with We provisions Of an
adoptd fight Conservation Plan
Namal Commmdty Conservation Plan,
26 Polent" y I. eu- Thno- I Than- No
Siwfluant SigniGnnl Signif nl IMMC(
Impart with Impact
Mitigationaropnnmd
ortehuaptaved!cormloml,regional, an? sate habitat commatim pled? Biological baseline summaries ad impact evaluauom were prepared for the Prolct site by Charles A.

Paneroac Plant Ecologist on AprR 27, 201) and February 26, 2018. The Apsil27, 2017 assmment inclWm dic reedierof five site surveys coMucml in 2W5, 2012, 2013, 2014, aid 2015. The February 26, 20181rner repos[ WomficaRy adolmewasithe wetland A Biological Resource was also
ppared by TedWinfield, FhD. m August14, 201'/. hese MalSsmcodwnadusirn; u wi asthe biological assessmentf0urd is the Negative Ecdareum pfepar i for the Gwwal Plan Mw. drn® t and Rezoning, winchwasadoptedby theCityCruncdm Mach 13, 21106, form0e bansfor thissection.

Biological resources include Common Plant and Minn', socim, aud special - latus Plants Md Minnab m designai by OmU. S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) amdde Cali Rome Deparommt of Fish Md Wddlife ( CDFW) Biological resources also include warm of me United States, asregulated by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACOE), Nodo Coast Regional Water Quatiry Control Road NCRWQCB), Md the CDF W.

Plant Crnnnnqual and Natural Babhcb
According to the Pattersonreport vegaatiw tbmuglwut the SanIs notion mohwiw Yamoral rPIMd weds and grasses. The doarimnt spcim include ( coronary acoiing to Meda & Rck. 1968) mascrds ( Brassica), chickary ICichonlM), thistles (Cinimo, Smnchus SilydM, Caduus), wAd radish RaohMus) several small nomadve Sorbsand Image species (Vicia, Gerarumq McWanva, Mdicago, Erosional, and rxrnx+mesmanducedgrasses(Avena t om a mWtillorvc, Bromum [21 PbaUns a9aatica BONeum [ 21 Valois, Tediathervm, Cyndon, Feshma aruudinacm). There are an trees onsite, roarMy other significant woodyvegectiom there area few scatteredcoyotebrush (Bacchans) shrubs.

Themil u regionallyNpicalindigenous; ( Wright) clayloam, witha darkmatrix, butlargelydevoidof redoxor moWing, Md with historicaladditionsofvanous fiRnnamrisls (rocks, WiLgravel) in Plain.

SodacrossvimaBYtheMme Sitehasbeensignificandyshared (graded, disked, dim ccl, M have wry/aRpre-exudag moral drairage fatmes or roam.

The Site was surveyed for posible rare plant occurs® erasin 2005 ( Febramy 22, April S), 2012 ( March 23, April 20, Mry 4), 2013 (March27, April 11, May9), 2014 (April 7, Awe25), and2015 (Aped3, 20). Each site visit inwly i walking essondaffy toe enure Sim, rating Plants clmcr d, and camefoRy assonance any low plwea All Planesencountered were identifid, at lean m the level ncessarym determine PotentialMmmovves or mriry.

Norove, endangered, or wherwiwscaitive plantspecieswerefoundontheSimduringMYoften field surveys, nM no arch spsim have been hmurrimlly repos i haveby the Cnlifarom Native PlanaSociety CLAPS) or the CalifOmia Natural Diversity Doc Base (CNDDB). In fact, the Sim u hcav0y domwad by an as;orment ofcoarmon run - native awudi grosses and weeds, with almost an remaining native veggabon.
27 There are m moral babimts or plant commwNes that remain on the Site. The entire Site supports a dense carpet ofnoa- move grasses and wards.

WetlandsTheSitewassurveyedforpoxblewetlandroditiomduringthesamefieldexamimuovscitedabove Bashontheseprovedmadobservation, amapshowing ®Coralssodandwassubmittedtoad substradly, yapprovedbytheArmyCorpsgmchummednoors (theCorps), resultingb0.03"/ acreoma anawwllywet
SwalehabitatwhichtheCopsclaimedo `sulth
ruotW".

Thulathetti ortagmtic
anisdominatedbYcommonmmoregr
ssaesaadw
ds, withmioftharrivevegetation-nectlddlyanasmallanointofcorrosionsemaphoregrossandtoadrush. TherestoftheSiteexhibitoffearingmhydrologisucla,dqWomughveroclandmualoutweMonlysmallaccunacofOeeunghydology. As such, the Site is almost camplerelY Without wctlaod.

According to the February 26, 2018 port, this small wetland feature provides whitest no obtainable wmlad reswuce value andpmvidesm suitable babiut for any regionally known Iissedspecies, Plant or wJdfle.

The February 26, 2018 reportalso assessed the potential impact ofthe development ov thewdavd The mp n ford that the Project m desigud, successfully avoided dm wetland. The repos fimher founddantthereit at noneedfor protectivesetbackSomthewetlandbecause: 1) Thereareholy not weOaM resmace antidotes In pmtect 2) The inmdiawly surrounding grassland (0 to 20 ft fiom 0.032 wetland) w01 capture and filter any S0%doormight enter the area 3) The wd® d does sot rely carares - wide rum6'( warershai). The report concludes the setback shown m the site plan is sufficient and gives the abscense of any sioficant biological resources prevent on site, there is no need for my relaid corruption measures or formal wNaod or semitive species pemtitting.

CmTheProjectSiteisdevgmtdinthePro®rammaticBiologicalOpinion (PBO) as `Mayadverselyaffect planta but would not likely adversely affect CTS
Accordingin @. Td WinfieldBiologid ResoumsAsiessmestthevmre%r kmumCTSbreadingshe is locatednppmxim atelY5,Oo5has noMwot of the PosnerSiteat the Sorhwest CommuCry Park SW). TheotherreportedCfS broodingsitesareeithersouthof ToddRoador westof StonyPoint Road
In an email dated Sepmmber S. 21V4, fiom Viacom Gtiego ( FWS) to W. Mark Gamy ( Project Applicanty FWS concluded than "... this project will not result in' mke of the thmtesed sadanttheyCj=sitelacksotenmadea(Ambystomacalifamiesse)nanaTheemvlgoesontosaythentheprojectsitelacksproemiala courpg
habitatroesadisisolatedSom
Teds
either known
or bm- in6 Potential m support LTS. The camplem cmaJ is append m . Td N' infield' s report in Appendix B.

The Prow site is isolated fiom known CIS breeding site; in the region by the orruestructionof residesuulsubdivisions, bamimf in& cob%andnormdenim_ SunnyPointRoad.whicbisaheatily naveldrandafroreprmeotabarriermmovementby CIS. Inastudyby Helsand Bmhwa ( 2001). cited in Tresham and Cook ( 2008), they estimated dot roads with levels of traffic greater than 12,000 vehiclewlay would Prove to be 100 percent lethal to migrating amphibians Stony Point Road has an average daily traffic volume of 20,454 vehicles/ day.
0 W. ( a) fess Than Signdruat The Site was amveyed for possible rare plait reemrercss in 2005 February22, April S), 2012 (Morc123, April 20, May4), 2013 (Much 27, AntiI 11, May9), 2014 April7, have 25), and 2015 ( Apard3, 20). Fsh site visit involved walking essentially the entire Site, notingplum ab urved, ® dcarefu0y commandingany law plata. All plain encounteredwereidentified, at Imst on, the level ocesay to determine potsbli commomea or rarity.

No mm, eodanged, orotherwiseseosioveplantspeciewerefoundontheSitedining anyof Wefield surveys, not no such spcies have been hismri® Ily, reported here by the California Native Plum Society CLAPS) or the CalBmnia Natural Diversity Dam Base (CNODllk The Projct Site is designated in the PBO as "May adversely affect plana, but would not likely adversely affst C19.' In an e-mail dated September 8, 2004, FWS smludd that `... this project will rut result in " take" of the threatened CaBfomla Tiger Salmrender ( AorWystoma caliifomiense) ( CPS).

Thepojeet sitelackspotentialbroodingbebitataM is isolatedfromareaseitherknownorhaving Potential to support CTS.

Recommended Mitigation Measures: None requires
W. ( b) Lase Wan Slgnadeent fmpa There u an ripvim habitat and there appears ro be an oWa sensitivenaturalcommonlyidermifiedin localortopmastplans, policies, regulationsorby the California Deparoveat offish ued Wildlife an US Fish marl Wildlife Semce. AlOmughthe 11ojst site is located within the fundal range of the Sonoma County California Tiger Salamander, at We time of theGeneralPlanAmendmentandRezoangapplicationforWePmjeetare, saidanAmong prapatym the west ( 310 Bellevue Avmue) We likelihood ofthe preens ofCTS was reviewed The Negative Declaration prepared for the project, which was subsequently adoptedby the City Council maker Remluuon Number 26519 daaticed then basil on We mbaaaed= tura ofthe sunomdings. developmemerr improvements m all four side of the Proem, and the an effect later and email dated September 8, 2004 but the US Department of Fish madWildlife Service a CTS' Yake' is not likely m Recommended Mitigation Measures: None required
W. ( e) Less Wan Significant Imp M The Site was surveyed for possible wedad conditions during Wesame field examinations cited in she April 22, 2017 Panama report. Based on there ammdatd obsevariot, a mapshowingminimalwe0mdswassbmind to andsubsequentlyapprovedbythe Carpo resulting in 0.037 acreof aseusmullywe aconichabitatbeing clamed asjurisdictionar by then Corps. This habitat is not aquatic per seand is dominated by mammon normative grasses andweeds, with minimal arrive vegetation, this being a mall smtuat of common semaphore goats and mad rush.

Psi
the small we0avd area depicsM above will be many awWod by the Ptem the February 26, 2018 report pre td by Charles A. Pattmsun, Flom Ecologist, concludes the setback shown on We sits plan is sufficient and given the abscrose of my stgaducam biological resmnrs present on site, there is m odformymlatd agaponmcasoresmtmmnlwdl orsensiuvesp pnmitong. Hw the hoped is wWxkred Less thm Sigvificsvt.
necommendd Mifiga0m Measure: None required.

W. ( d) Las than Signifi® nt lmpacL As depicted m the aerial photo below, the site and suncunding pmpmics arc without sigaifiraot vegetative cover than would provide a annual babim for native residentormigmmrywildlifes iea Likewise, We site is not walun as esabG w dlifewmdor. 30 l
Fi gure 2 Wetland Ma ( cuapsapprovedplo, min
3150P m Avenue, Santa Rage, cased
NORTH sawcoPnevamed Ma,* C y s
CPatarsmv Masdt 20V Ttbmvs U919} D dr- 01i733eU
Basemap: mmaaey Appmc595x
NoSaoBiolovealBaselineandAssessmmt
the small we0avdarea depicsMabovewill be many awWodby theP tem the February26, 2018 reportpre td by CharlesA. Pattmsun, Flom Ecologist, concludesthe setbackshownon We sits plan is sufficientand giventhe abscroseof my stgaducambiological resmnrs presenton site, thereis m odformymlatd agaponmcasoresmtmmnlwdlorsensiuvesp pnmitong. Hw the hopedis wWxkred Less thm Sigvificsvt.
necommendd Mifiga0m Measure: None required.

W. (d) Las than Signifi®nt lmpacLAs depictedm the aerial photo below, the site and suncunding pmpmics arc without sigaifiraot vegetative cover than would providea annual babim for native residentormigmmrywildlifesiea Likewise, We siteis not walunas esabG w dlifewmdor. 30 Thaemsy beminimumhididatvaluein Weexisting@acusthatpresentlywvurbe sateforgramd- nefivgbird spwia. AlWwgh rot covsidad significant, the application ofe AnMardwoditiov o[ approval ( COA) requiring preymaaauctiov surveys for pmpertie wiW on-site or adjoining nsdvc" tiov will addisessany potential fact ongmund- neliog bitde Development of did site mayenhanceWehebim vilue Wmughtheeddioonofsneetnxs sodan -siteleodueping. Theejxt wvidnal m have a Inas then Sigoifirmt Impvct ov the movmnen[ ofwtive mmi8atory wildlife specie.

Recommended Mifigafian Measures: \ ons required.

Nle - 0 No Impzeb The Projectwill votwdliRwiW any loot poticie moNivaoces lvutwting biological resources, sucM1e a treepresmvauw policy a wdiretce m adoped wvsmauw plena The ady applicablelocal ordinarce is Ne SemaRov' free ONwavce andthereerevo tree oosire Recommended Mifigafion Mesmta: Noxscluiral.

S andard Candifiens of Approval ( COA)
Preconnmctiov surveys will be conducted vo vwre tlm I6 days prim to thestmt ofw shuc4on m wend disaahw% activifie iftbe xtivities awwduriog We eating senmu ( Febreary 1 m Augur[ IS).

Pres svuctionsurveyswJl berrymted n130 -day immals until mvmuctiov hasstarted Activevms 31 will be identified, loafed, and a bill vM protective mantes win be implem® tM Pmnarive consorts will include establishment of clearly delinated ( i. e., Visa -barrier, wangle construction f ing) exclusion zones around each vest safe The active nest sites within exclusion zones will be nnitored on a weekly basis tluoug3mm the nesting seasonin identify any signs ofdixmrbance or nest abandwmnfem. The barriers training exclusion renes x91 remain in place cold the young have left the mostand are fnaging independently or if Poenest is no longer active.

Sources: 1, 2, 6, 1, 10, 11. 12, 13, IJ.

Comments. Expansion of origin land uses wvisioned order the Same Rasa General Plus 2035 would resuivc or alter walafWs, marshes, or vital pants. The EM for the Santa Rosa General Plan 2035 found this potential impact to be Ixcs Wm Significant with dharnce to appliable ('. meal Plan policies. TheProject will implement Grnml Plus policy OSC- D- I which pemtits protection of wetlands though avoidance.
32 PatentiaM L Than- Lear - Than- No
significant Significant significant Impa"
hnPact rRh Impnnt
Mitigationmrorrmra
V. CULTURAL. RESOURCES
Wmldthep jest
Cause a mbstmdal advnse change in
thesigmfic ofabistoriealresoumc ®
asdefroedf § 15064. 5?
b. Cmveawbsimual advwa chnngef
OmsigWfcaviceofmarchamlogical Cl ® smmce pumuavt to § 1506M1.5? c. Oirectlyoridi ydeuoyaunique
eonmlogical tewmce or mm or ®
unique geologic fnhue?
d Uismb cry humanremains, iochWing
t menedonside ofdalicard
ce135,§?0W.
9icR
HealCods ® W1.75, & §
7090,
and Health and
Safety Code §] 0505( b)]
e. WOWdthepject causeasubs', ntiW
a:iMcchangewfe asdefiedofam
IicWtmal
mwodasdefinediW ® Public Resomees Cade ZIO] 4?
A Hiaorical Remarces Sh* by Qng & Associated datM March 6, 2017, designed m satisfy vu ud i¢wmsa ified in CEQA, was prepamd fr We Pmjct sim. l mpon serves as Nc bmis ofthe following soalysis and cmmlusiaos.

Rircunion:

Thee jectsite, I" w in the Cmy of Santa Rosa, is in an am planed fr multi- GmilY tesdenual development The sin is vacaat appm wly 5.95 acres in size, ofmiWmal sfpe and loauA appm uely3 miles southwestofdownfwu Sao', Rus; m shownon theSanmRma, Califontie 7S USGS topographic maps. There are m Emwn unique 9m109ical or palmnmlogic femme on the ProjeR site that woWd fdi® mthe psesmceofcWtmal resources. The Pmje sitewassubjectof aMCWoual Resp mSnWyin Marchof201] andmresourceswereidcntifi Imnaeb:
33 V. ( 4 Is, c, d, e) I Lessthan Signifceat Impact The Origer Report sated that loads within the vicinity of the Potion had been sNdi xt previously ( Bowers2015). Historical resources were identified during the Boom study. However, Oreidentified resourca do act have the potential to extend wen We Pmjecgay. The mnoreportedethoog WcsilawiO aquanefmileofthe steadyarea. The field survey completed for the Project site discovered two isolated a tract, acobair blue plass fragment and a blue Bow version: plate shard The rpon determined toot isolated a ntams do not connote historical resources; Werefore, an bison: resources were found. A reryar for comment was sent o We State of Ca ifmma Native American Homage Commission as well the Fderatd Indians of Groton Rancheria Kashia Baud of Pomo houses of Stewmt Point and We Lydon Rarecheria of Caffsmia No response was received
Recommended Afitimudon Measures. None required
There is a possibility not buried archaeological deposits i dd be present cod accidental dionvery coodmzm. ToaddressapspoteddaiaswetmWepobifryofwcoveuiehumusremainstheapparentillWeeinrelaaddieddnLopmeilityviainChefofShoutedConditionsofApparent will daryately addressthuspossibility Stimulated Candidate; 4Approval ( COA) t UnRarmN Applied Development Policies:

CI l l rchnsimjeal Resources
Ifambewlogical remains are anrovad, work at the place ofdiscovery should IN halted immerhately until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate We rums. Prehistoric archaeological site indicators include: obsidian and cher flakes and chipped stone ovals: northing and mashing implemwts ( e.g., slabs and hand screw ad mortms and pestles); bedrock oummps aM boulders with runner : reps; and IoW ly darkrnd midden soils. Midden soils may contain a combination of any of me previously lined items with the possible addition of hone and shell remain. and fire affected slaves. Historic period site vdiwmrs generally include: fragments of plass, ceramic. and mesalobject; miffed addsplit lumber, andstructureand featureremainssuchasbuilding Commotion and discrete trash depovts ( u&. wefts, Privy Pit, dumps).

CU42 Human Remains
If humanremainsareencountered, aDactivitiesinWeivmudine victory oftlte fid andwith an adequate buffer zone will be haled and, io acwNantt with Caffomis HWW and Safety Cade Section 7050 5, sheCounty Coroner will be notified and permined to assessWeremains. Futon, pursuam to Cdifomis Pubfe Removes Code Section 5097 98( b) remains shill be left in place and fee foto disturbance rmtil a find decision as to the treamueut and disposition has been made. Ifthe County Coroner damnation We remains robe Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall I e contacti within a fwsoreble mundane. Subseque ifly, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identih the - mos likely descendane' The most likely descending shall that make recommedation and engageW consdtnion wttceming the treaMenl of Werani as provided in Public Ramr: es Code 5097. 98.

Sourer: 1, 2, 14.

Comment The Project has We potentiai m imPect arehamloplal and cultural resource. However. when uniformly applied development policies and amudmds seaforth in the General Plan and 34 SpodaldC anion ofAMnoval ere appliedb the Pmjc the pmmtial impact is less Ihm sigWErmt. The Santa RasafienaW P1 2035 EM detamiced that tluough tl u Imeatatwa of We Sante Rosa fmaal Plan 2035 Policia, inn; mIopcal, paleontological and cWturel msomces waWd he futtha pmts T Gema) Mm EIRE fond Omt devcloPmrnt within the cilY of nap Ron consistent with its fmrerel Plm poh malong with potaoial development in the su ooan g goo would m be expo tore t m amndalive impacts to atchaeolopW or adtmd nssou .( GP EM Table 2- 1: J-1 thmupp J<) The potenM1ilimpacts wan found mbeL than Si gezut The Pmjmt has ban fond to have m (. Lloual Raomces impacts_ 36 PotentiNv Less - Than- Las Har- o
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact xidu Impact
Minnesmcurpmvted

VL GEOI YA SOHS
Wouldthepmba' t
a Expose people or macrame to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or dwth involving:
it Ruptum of a latown earthquake
fault a delineatN on the most
recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geolrgia for the are or
ballonofaofakpownfault! Re[ e lament
to avisi
eiiaiaiouofMinesandGwlogy
Spcid Publiwdon 62.
o) Soong seimvic ground shakinG?
al) Seimaic mimed graded failure,
including liquefaction?
rv) hdsHdes?
b. Resalmm columnist mil erosion or the
los oftapsod?
C. Be loaned en a gmlogic rout or wit that
is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result ofdce project deal
purentially result in ov, or off, site
landtide, Intend spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil. as definal
in Table 18- 1-B ofdre Unit
Building Cade ( 1994), creauvg
sul mantial risks to fife or pmpert) n
e. Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of mature maks or
almneuve werewmedispowl systems
IDwhere sewers are not available for the
dopoml ofwartewaNl!
36 Blsmasfon. A Sods Investigation was prepayi for the subject Property by Young Ev® neariog Saaces, Geotechnical Comutants. Said rrymt is chiral Separatists 21, 2001. The soils investigation included field exploration, excavating 4 tact pas, obtaining core ampler and laboratory testing.

Ramomendatioa for sae developmmr m included in the rryuat, b firrintion conawal in this repon aswell in the General Plant2035 ERt and the UC Davis Soils own front the basis of this analysis.

W.( a. 0 Lan Than Significant lmpam Publishel gmlogic maps show an active fawn in the awry of theshe. The nearestbate mnsidaed seismically activeinchule WeBmldsbmg- Rogers Cr¢ k Fault andtheSanAndreasFault Thep jeer siteis located. ppmximamly 2 milec to We nonheastof theUealdadurg-RogersCreekFault and 18miles to Wesouthwestof the SunAvdr® s Fault The site is not within the AlquistMob Special Studies Zone. AS a readt the risk of fault rupture at the site is considered significantly low.

W. ( a u, u44 d) Lm than SgmaOeaat The City of SantaRon is sublect to gwloFwl haards relatedprimarily in seismicev® n ( esnhshat") due bpraems of active bob. Theproject siteis lac WN raw& of We appmximme IimOs of the area subject m moag xismi: Found sharing m depictedinthe Gecem1P1m2035( Figure12- 3). The UCNa ImaachveSoaWebivdiaJathe sou - type m be Wright Loam. The site calibration performed by Young Engineering Services bend the upper soil unit to be weak and Amus study clay which varied in depth between 1 to 1.5 fl These sols m camidaedtu have a low m high expanawpotmtial. The sire is urderbiv by a stiffen nay stiffardy clay, which u consider a Mee a low resmethrmexpmsiov porejil.

ApplicatianofUwform BuildingCode, CorystavdarSsandTitle 2MCalif rwaCodeofltegWmiomin effaai thetimeofabuildingpermitapplicationmweernidimeasuressummedinthepreliminarygeologic investigation toaod
mierreponvity. priormbuJdingpvmrtisuencewilladdressporrnYilimPaeb related to possible seimic activity.

Thefollowing Stallard candotioosoftippmvW shall " plied to WeProjectin thedate of Building permit issuancr.

Standard Coaditiom of Approval:

All structures shall be designed in acemdaoce with California Balding Code( CBC) and my local mnerrdmmb thereto in place m the time of bidding permit submiaal.

All rem® nidation of the preliminary geolopc investigation preparN br theP jut Poor in theissuanceofIndi ivgandgradingpermitsshallbeincmpaatednim theprojectdaiFt.

The Project Civil Ergiveer shall design the site drainage to rolled surface wain btu strain drvo systems and discharge water at appropriate locations. Erosion earned aseaavec during and after con um shall mnf0rm to the most recent version of Erosion and Sedimrnr Cooaol Food Mmml prepared by the North Corot Regional Water Quality Coonol Board N. ( a. pv, h) Lev Hao Sigalftrantlenpact. The pmjea site is level- rind sliding is notpaexat or onticoparodin be m. Likewisn subsnvtiil mol erosbn or loss oftuP soil is sot anticipated. The Pmjecr wdl be subject tu emaov cannot mrasures during aha afercaoso- uction in indicated in the Saarland Conditions ofAppmvil ( COA), cited above
Recommended Alitigation Measures: No mitigation required. urn
VL( e) Nolmpact. Theprojmtwouldcoovectrotheexistingwastewmasy# anandwoWdmtnced septic tarts or an altemame wastewater disposal system
Recammmded Mitigation Measures: No mitigatim nNui at-
Sources: 1. 2. 11. 15. I& M
Cam cut: When unifomdy applied development policies and standards set frdt in dre General Plan and Staodmd Conditions ofAppmval are applied to theP jM the potential impact on Geology, Sols, andSeismicityis les thensignificmLTheGeneralPlanEM foundthazdevelopmentwithin thecity of SemaRosa consistent with its Genual Plan policim along with potential development m the surrounding mgim would not be expected to result Wsignificant impacts or cumulatively significant impar to geologic and seismic hoard ( GP EM Table 2 -1: M - I through M- 3) The potmoal impacts werefnundto be Lessthan Significant- TheProjecthasbeenfouvJ to havean impaar to Geologyand Sols.
potendally L Than- Less - Than- No
Significant Sigoifinor sigmmcant Imps
Impact with Impart et
AfitigadopIncorporated
Vll. GREENtlO11SE (: AS GMISl1UrvJ
World Weprtry«[
a GrnerateGreeorin GasBeninmyeither dimtlY m iedirc0y, Om may haves signi0ravtimpecton the ®
an. emnm® n
It GovBin with my applicable plan, pofrry
m regulation of m agency adopted fm
Ihepmpa ofteducing the emissiom of ®
greaWmsegases?
Discussion
V ba -6). Less Man Sigolncent Impact: Climate change ref as any stgoificmt change in monsoons of chs me, such as average temp osomm, precipitation, or wind patiam over pound of time.

Climate couple may result from natural processes, analhuman activities that change the composition of patternshaveendalterthesiofaodfeglobalthelaodnavcrosvtcomlesMeproemshereaneorrtbeasassurface. globalon tipevemgeimnmreet ( GHG) reofMeatmospherenmrtheFaM'ssurfeu, amibutedmazcrintheatofGere, whatGas (GHG) camseacensw themmsphere Gremhpuu ga map heat in the atmosphere, which limen hea6 the smfieoftheFarahgomeGHGsvamrmmWlYevdarecmittdtotheactivities, TelhraulpnmumlProcessus while ecuarecrmof
avdrndnedsolelylsenamhumanrborm)ia.Theemissionpf
humanGW(
hthroughhecombustiwoffosalruelsli.e. withfuelsenamoringwanniaMon)mldefine HGothv
humaneoufolloappemsmbeclose (M2), atMwiMCHH), warming. Se (nu)tewdefineGHGtoMrrflhw cafollowing
cubesdioxide(CO2),MellwmSafetyoksovesoxide(82)5hydm0hemostnos. warrantGHGthatandtangf rmfohoneaffimoide (
HmtrnandSafetyCade, sctimby
mutg).)
ltd most
mmw GHG Mat resalesfiom humanaztivnryu whoa dioxide, followed by metham andwonnus oxide
Axdmhly Bill 32 (AB32), theCaliforniaGlobalWormingSolutiomAct of 2006, recognizesthat glahbnappingpthemurceMe
continual
amountsofGHGemissions,- TaketiointheadverseimpactssupplyorwalrtotooincludeMeti Sierra snovpack,
a
rumrypmblms,
ereMwainedispalirymvd supply
o[watertothestatefromtheSienamowpacesariat senlevelsrestatinglathedisplacementofenviron& nt. andalincreaseinMe meidepces,
damage to murine cusysems and We natural
oprobledIn werethesdemesofinfectionsdetentes,ashme,andmnerbmmnbeWW- GHGmissionsIvmdeeto eaver
Weyer2035 (a ABJ2ambushesasuregmlofreduringGuslonlsiommthfatherreductionsMeyensfollowreductionofappmximetely25pa thomforstemssov levels) with fiuWm reductiovs to follow_ 39 On Decants 4, 2001, the Such Rosa City Coined adopted a resolutionm become a mother of Cities for Climate Pielectiw( CCP), aproject ofthe International Council on Loral Environmental htiatives.

OutAugust2, 2005theCity adoptedResiduum26341whichcommitedtheCity ofSawaRosa (Ciry) WseducetheChys municipal (i.e., city 8ovemmmt) goMoux gasemissionsby 20pemembelow 2W lff Js by 2010 and committed to help fambuite the cmmmmdry-wide gomhouse gas rMuction Wild of 25% from 1990 levels by 2015 (City of Santa Rosa 2005), 1nOcmbef 2008, the nine Sonoma Conroy cities and the County with the help of the Climate Protection Campaign ( CPC) imowpoated the grmdmuse gas reduction gmalsinto the Somata County Cmmmmity Climate Action Plan (CAP). b Jure 2012, the City approved the SemaRose Climate Actino Plan ( SRCAP) The SRCAP idcra fics a need to tMuce ® ssiona by a awl of558, 090 tool ( ser25%) below business -as -usual Ievcls Mijected FM 2020 to meet the wadbushed gt« Nwuse gas reduction gods. The SRCAP includes mmeudatiovs for mincing emissions in the building, transportation, agicdmre, forestry, and solid wastesectorsandincludesrecommendationsto reducetheCity'srelianceontheelectricalgridby imphememivgrenewableenergypjots - TheSRCAPm®.urres, policiesandprejMs a wince commmity, wide GHGs are aligned with the gods and pOlims of the Santa Rom General PhanOpen Spice end Conxnatim EI® m
To ensure that new development complies with the City' s GHG reduction progam the SRCAP containsa Mew Oevehapetnt ChoklisC. TheChecklistcontainspoliciesallowingnewdevelopment W incorporate minutes for SRCAP compliance and to redm: e pmeatid GHG mpnch to less than significant level. The Checklist dumas 15mandatory measut¢ If project entities meet one or more the mandatory, mosures, substitution ofaWer measaw devibed in the Cbecktist l permitted The proposeddevelopmentat 3150Dutton Avenuewmrpmates all tnandatorynuasurescontainedrhe SRCAP that are applicable in, residential projects. A mut of 22 measures will he comptial with. These include the fouming:

Policy Comply with CALGron Tier 1 Standards: The Project is d® fired a comply wild State Energy, requirements for Title 24, City of Santa Rosas CALGreen requirements and CALGvem Tin I Standards in effect at time ofpennit submission Such standards have bean ivmrpmnal ion site development, building design and anAsr pang; Poy: Rd time EnergyMowmrs: Thee jeer wfllimlWeemrgy momitorsmuack arewgy Palicy 1.4.2: Comply whit toe City' s Tree Preservation Ordinance ( Smit Rosa Code Section 12-

24. 020 No o-ecs will be rammed
Pow: ProvldeeproCandpriVatethe
of
tr withtheZoningCmde:AsshownonthelandscapePlan. scapeprojectincludes;isinotheantewiofteSa, SawaamZoningC deo)
andomeoeigiaTheLandanddesignisinconnivancewiththeSauteRosaZoningCode. SaintRosaDaigv Guideline and Water ElLcievt LaMxape Ordinance.

Pow: hull new sidewalks sod paving with high solar reflectivity material: All proposed new sidewa driveways and parking ares will be paved with oaunials that commit either color or other enhancements to provide enhanced reflectivity. 0 Pow' Pre -wireamidpmplumbfr mlar thermalorPV sy9rms: lbepmjear maYincludethe ivwllation of mlar phsimvo0aic pmels on the roof of the community building.

Poy: Suppmmiorgrlmeamdon ofslation plays amidwonder plies: The ProjectB not within a Statim Area Plan m within aCrs idor Plan, The Project does suppoe altemevve insidesOfvenat by pmvidiug102bicyclelockersandseveralekswcddvehicle.:bargiogorations.

Py: Lnptovenomvehicularnetworktopromotewalking, billing: TheProjectis designed to pmmomwalkingandbikingWmughthepmvisioaof bicyclelockers, sidewalksaedbicycle lanesasrquired alongDarton Avenue -The project u bondd by theSMARf ail, which wclWn a tricycle pe leshian path along its western edge. It is a project objertive to pmmom use of am bicycle and pedestrian Paths.

Poy: Supponmeeduse, higl»zde Vdevelopmemitnwrsery : TheProjectisa mNiim donsnyrcidential projectconsistentwith theCityof SaamRinaGwval PlanandtheRJ - I8 zaoiag denier.

Po. l: Provide affordable housiv6 vearumdit Thepjariss mdiim dem0y rmidrntial rmmlp je ThePmjm wdl betpmcsiblc for WeWymwt of all requiredalEonablehousing ingwct fees.

Pow: tmmllcalming [nmiveamimpmvePdemiadbikeexpedrncc ThePmjar willhe responsible fer improvements along in Dorton Avenue bondage.

Pow: Idement theBirycleandPedesmmMasterPlan: Anyregainedlmpnovelnenls along Amon Avenuerill be donein mcoNaoce with city savdaNs Pow: InstaObicycleparkingcrmislmrwithreguhtions: 102bicyclelockerswill be provide- Bicycle parking shall beprovidedperthe city' s Z ' vg code.

Pte: W lelanicvehiclechargingequipm ?: Sevemlelsviwlvehiclm chmgivg smtiom will be Provided w f peaking area
Powhicre versionofco s honwastcneconmcmrwivdivenmmv on
wanebrheeamntprx bleandprepareaComhudira Wawe Maregernern Planfmrecycling arddisposal of struction wastes.

PoI'cv T1_l: ReduceWe ble water fm landicapmg: The ProjectImdscal ing will utilize low water umplsgdretnleiiiyOf
Swillosisdrip
sphmsmingsdmcodmBer. TheROl. willbecmnpOm[ with MeCityof SantaRose'sWaterEfficientIaedscapeONmence (WELD).

Pp : Use water orders winch tract real- time weer use. Such meters will be used.

Policv'/ 33: Med oo-sim miler separadov requu® mtswlacauom with cunrentor fumerecycle water capabitiues: lbispolicY wiB be adlnaMb.

Pow: EsmbeshcommurdtySardemandmbarfauns: CommunityBands havebeen imorporeted iib the Pmjecfs design.
41 Policy Provide omdmf oudats for charging lawn equipment: Policy rood.

Policy Insall low water use landicalso; Low water use IaMswpes will be used The Pmjct will be compliant with the: City of Santa Rose' s Water Efficient Ladsnpe Grdbwme.

Polis 9.2.1: Minimize consanction equipment idling time m 5 minutesar less: The developeticooswction mariner will condition contractor agreements to limit cooatmctioo ryuipment idling time to 5 minmesor less, comistent wishtheCity' s SanodaNMeasuresfor Au Quabty.

Policy 9_22: Maintain cmatrmtion equipment per manufacturer' s specifiemions: The developer/ mosauctim mmeger will cootition contractor alpeemwb to re<ryire Mat all equipment used at Me site he m mmemed in aunNance widi the manufacturers instructions.

Pow: Limit Green Hmss Gas( GHG) coasauctionrym" p byusingelclrified equipmentor Mimemfuel: Th developerwill= ludepmv omincntrecmragreemeom encouraging the now of electrified equipment or ryuipment using altavative fuels.

The proposed project is consistent widi the applicable local plana policies and regWatious (sec Sction X. Lad Use, Response b) and would not conflict wiM the provisions of AD 32, the pmvisioos of Me SRCAP, the applicable air quality plan many other State or regional plan. policy or regidwon of an agency adopted for the purpose of rducing gmcohouse gm emissions_ The Pmjct impact m GHG is foul m be less Man significant.

Recommended h1diptioa Measures: No mitigation required.

Sources: 1, 2, 5. 9. 11.

Cornmeal: The Project bas incorporated the mandatory GHG Measures fomd in the City of Sanm Rosa Climate Action Plans, Said meamms are reHcted in the policies of the General Plan Therol , meP jct has been found to have a less than significant impact on GHG emissions. 42 43
Potentially LeisThan- ims TFan- o
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impat xith Impact
MitigationIncorporated
VW. tlAZ4RDSANDDAZARDDUSMATER1Af5
would the prriJect
a Cram a significant b mrd b the public
or rhe wvimomwt through the marine
transport, use, or dispwzl ofhavNous
mntmnels9
b. p a significant hvud In flag Public
or the oa% ovmwt through teesowbly
f ble upsn part accidwt
conditions conniving the relase of
hamrdrius mmenala aro the
rnvno® wIT
C. Emit hamrdaus eaicsioos or handle
heaadrius w xmielY hsamdous
materials, subsancR wwame withw ID
one - quaver mile of an musing in
prriper ed school?
d Be locoed on a site which is included
on a lin Oflsmodons materials siren
compaad pumping In Govmmm® t Code
Section 65962. 5 and, as a result, would
a Crowe a sigwDco tr hemN ro the
public or the wvuocmwt?
e. For aproject criminal within an airport
leadusePlanw, wheresuchaplanbasInnenrifenothewadrtr
uithwtwo
publicprowt useaiaidywon th meralproject result gamfety bamNfolarea? tesidrigwworkingIn
fo
Chepjcrarea?
I. For a project wittin the vicinay of
pivme aitatnwould die pojnt result
una safety hmNfor people reniding or El
Llwohw8inrhePjwtpan?
g. Impeirimplemwuti000forphysiWly
wterfi with an adopted Curage
43 Polemmily Less - Than- LassThao- NO
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact nith Impact
wtigaeonIncorporated
par? ?uuplayorcmngmcyevacuationplea?
h. Exprsepmple or nnM1n25na
significant risk of loss, injury or drath
involving will land fires, including
where wildlmNe are adjacent to
urbawzed areas or where residences are
wterdxdwiW avildlaadt!
Dfi
VID. ( a through f and Id No Impaeh The proposed project avoid be tapered n comply with nelmmt Foe and Budding Codes, which sill rdece the risk ofupsa or release firm the use or transport of hazardous materials According n the State of California EnviroSnr Database ofHarardaus Mineral Clmup Siler, the sim is can w or neer any Fderel or Sate SuperfurW Sites. The proposed use is a multi- fmaily residential use and does not include hazardous materials other than the use or various materials by the residents that arereadily mailable to the consumer for household uses. The partner ad not create a significant risk of upset or exposure bamd to human health and safety.

Theproject wood on both in hazardous missions at Ladle acedy hazardous material, suemensis, orwastewidtin' mile of anexistingorproposedschool. Waterforthesitewill bepmvidd by the City ofSanm Rosa. Accordingly. the PJect is ear anticipated to note a signifimt risk ofupser or h," M in bums, bealW and safety.

Thee Ject sim is located approximately 109 mild from the Charles M. SchWu Sonoma County Airport, and is oumde afthe Airport lend Use Plan Planting area Thee jest site is int within the vniwry of a privmc air mip.

The proposed site is located in an urbanized idustriallresidemiW area. The site is not wand within an urbanmildlandf zoite. Thesite is saved by afrHy developedpublic mdway, sytem.

VM. (g). Iem than SignificantImpact. TheCiry of SantaRosais undertheCountyof Sonoma's jurtsdictionfor theDepartmentof EmergencyServices. TiceDiiision of EmergencyMaoagernenrin the Dep, mtof Eme racy Servicesisdnledageocyforrhe Sonoma Operational/ TheSmnma Operational Aro cousins of nice incorporated cities ( Cloverdale, Come, Healdsburg, Petaluma, Rohcert Park, Sante Rosa Sebastopol, and the Town of Windsor), Sonoma SeamUniversity, the Sonoma County Junior College DistriM and oda special districts within the cotmnrysgmgmptiol bmmdmy Com onat NeprojcctskewoWdrotincerf withanadoptMmageocyrespomeor evazvatim plan. However, there may be brief ad wnrmluent disruptions to rrafl-rc during combination at the vin. Manors will moninr 91 mad disruptions end%ill clear the mrd fun emetgnny, vehicles.

This potential impact can he addressed through the application of Standard Cnditions ofApparvd regudiug Fm.. geocy Response ad Trappe Control
M
Recommended Mitigation Measures: No mitigations saryirodL Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergeomv ResponseRraffic Coastal
TbeapplAsovta
coustandard
uagggmgand1pmceduresmmmimiaehOffiecafetYoosadhefEchavrds. As salnired, msswctiov Oeggivg and sigmge, use of plates, ad older safery meawra shell he mcvee wild Caltrans 200fi Mavual ofUvif TraAc Control Devices- OOmrmeawres amu locludocldc
If temporary lane or strst closures are requited, the applicant slmll coomct emmy® cy response providers ( i.e., hospitals, police, fire, and ambulance) to determine if the sheet impactod are considered primary routs
Where construction lucesimes lace Of sneer closures along® ergrncy response roma, the applicant shallrxo® endand obtain approval ofaltemaw notes ovothermons from the aHectW service providers, m a miriman of me week prior on w Muction- Amoy construction, theapplicant " I notifythenoviceproviderson aweeklybuffsof the timing, locating and duration ofcomvuniov.

The applicant shall maintain pedanim sod veldcular access to public faciliria businem, andresidencesalong thestreetduring catmmunehoursand shall nanim7 the closure of pedestrian am vehicular access m other rima. Peak cotnmum homy are between ] LOAM - 400 AM and 4: W PM- 6: W PM
Sources: 1, 2, 10, 11.

Comment The Project bs the famatial to impact cmmgeoty response times. However, when undarady applieddevelopmentpoliciesand standardssetfodh in theGcumal PlanandStandard Conditions of Approval ere applied m Ito Pjct, Ne potontial impact ISles that sig rdficnnt Therefore, dacejest has been found to have a less thus siolicant impact W emergency response tip.
45 polenriatF Less -Than- Leam-Than- No
signifiont Significant Significant Impact
Impact xith Impact
Mitigationlomromwoul
M. RYOROLO YA WATRRQUA ITV
Wwlddieproject
a. Violate my water quality standards or
wane discharge requir® m¢?
b. Suhstmtially deplete groundwater
supplies or hawfi substernally with
groundwater recharge such War Were
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume
of the localctomdwmer
tabltaa
level(gg_, theproductionareofwouldpre-existingvwoulweltswoulddroptopre-existing alevelemsorwouldsupportalaral for
wlexisting
orplmndowesBrameforwhichfamouspmmi¢ have hem Smvrel)?
C. Subsuvdally alta We erisWrg drainage
padem ofdw site or moo, including
throughWeeran
a
atrwnorriver, inaammiaCramerwWch
mormh
would rend! in su lerosianor
vitei
sgetiovov- or oR- si4°
d
eeaistingding
pabwnaalty
too orpvrtav of We tete oramz, we
Wrooghdm ouraeanonoadccourseease
ere
stream or mwimtiapyinn
armor
WeareoravmmtofsmfmmffgWroamer which would result deeding ov oroR- tem?
e_ Create or contribute mnoffwatr which
would exceed We capacity of existing or
plamel sumunwater drairege systems or
provide subnmrial additional maces of
polluted rrmofl?
f. Otherwise suhatertially degrade water
quality'!
46 Discussion
Water Soon] : To determine the water supply needs for the City of Sam Rma' s future development amUtitiessDepartmentlossWculatMsoonerdemandandwatersupplypermanents. Theepmj%tionsare includedin tireCity s2005UrbanWaterMaapment Plananddo WaterSupplyAssessmentf ted Santa Rosa General Plan 2035. To pest the cornet wormysupply needs, sheCty bas an agreement for watermpp1Ywith theSmmmaCoopy, WaterAgrncytoreceiveW to29,100ave -fed peryourof water. Isaddition, theCityhastwogroadwaterwellsthatcanpmdsceupon2,300acre -fenperyearandthe Cityis sedcaner cardop" or of WeSub-Regioal Sym®, whichPsodacnssYdM waterfor irrigation.

Tomeettedmedsof sheCity'sGeneralPlangmwrhprojections, additionalwatersourcesbeyondwhat sheCity hasconstantlydevelopedcould be nedaL To mrgmenscurrentlydevelopedsupply. theCity will use water conservation, recycled water, additional grondwater ( wells), and possibly additional supplyDomtheSonomaCountyWaterAgency. At paistime, threeis adequatereliablewatersupply duringmosthydrologicconditionsforbothcurrentusersandfissureonusasdicasd by dbeCity's growth remonstrant regulations
The Cityhas hada bog- staMng commismmtto weer conservation, rewdtivg or savingsof over 3,900 ane -left peryeast. n 197677, theCity beganitswaterconservationFrogmanandoverWeyearshas i lemeotedmay iraovativewaterconsavmeriaentiva, suchasWeGoLow Flowprogram replaccl over 47, M high flow pars, showerh® ds and faaent senators wild atm - low Dow vasioos), washing snuchmeredeempsvgmms, landscape unimmut rebae programs, and other modential nand 47 Poterialh LessThan- Lssa Than- No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact pith Impact
Mitigationlumrponred
g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood
111711darea as napped oana fMwal
Food Hazard Boundary or Flood
Inaumoce Rate Map p other DOud
lammed didinwtion tap?
h. Place widen a 1110 -your flood hazard
am procurer winch would impede or
redirect food flows?
s. BaposepenPle smseuveswa
dgoifinvt risk of loss, usury ordnW
involvingmneiang, ivcindngflawing El Elrnultof the fv' hve oralevnor damg
i by seicha tsw® i., or
ousd0owon
Discussion
Water Soon] : To determinethe water supply needsfor the Cityof Sam Rma's future development amUtitiessDepartmentlossWculatMsoonerdemandandwatersupplypermanents. Theepmj%tionsare includedin tire Citys 2005 UrbanWater MaapmentPlananddo WaterSupply Assessmentf ted SantaRosa GeneralPlan 2035. To pest the cornet wormysupply needs, she Cty basan agreementfor watermpp1Ywiththe SmmmaCoopy, Water Agrncyto receiveW to 29,100ave -fed peryourof water. Is addition, theCityhastwo groadwaterwellsthatcanpmdsceupon2,300acre -fenperyearandthe Cityis sed canercardop" or of WeSub- RegioalSym®, which PsodacnssYdMwaterfor irrigation.

Water Efficient Iandocapu ChromosomeadWW by the Cay w October, 2015.

ThePjxt will mmallplumbingfutures earlfittingsthinwill includeotherwaterconservingmcasurea in accordance with CALGreen That 1 requhemeo4 as desenbed m the Rojo Description.

Water Cualin: Stonnwater, or wroffgmmted tinea min, thea is vat abmrbed into the ground accumulatesdebris, ch®icalsandcernpo0useosubsmomcaharmfultowaterquavery. Pollutedlifrmwmer entering creeks is concern because of its threaten public health and thePlant end animal lifethisinhabitwaeebyrioAdditiationinothmnfffiomingto
my increase Bowmaw atst
wolvesthazcausehydmmodifiwfionincreelqcoombutiagmInsofhebimanddraw, darluaticbiological diversity. u. ( wf) lass than Significant lmpacl
a.) 3150 Douro Avenue Development Projoet is within the permit boundary of floeNational Pollutim Discharge Elimination Symem( NPDES) M Storm Water Permit, which regulates discharges into the waecrshedwith the intent orhedomiug storm water pollution analprotecting water quality. Pursuant or the active NPDES permit the City ofSaora Rosa and the Canny of Sonoma have adopted the Steam Water Low Impact Development ( Lm) Technical Design Manual. A Preliminary Storm Water Mitigation Plan ( PS WMP) was developed for 3150 Wtmn Ave The PSWMP is in compliance with We City' s LID Motion 1.Once approved, implementation of the SWMP will assmrecompliance with NPDES regulaticm.

Recommended Mitigation Measures: Nomerequbet
b.) The project will rasemunicipal water fium the Ciry of Sano Rona Chosite wells will not be unin i for water serviceor lavdasping. The City of SantaRosamunicipal water systemis sudhcientto supply watnto the pmjecL Funhrnnor thO htheimplementmionofB tMauagnnem Practice outWed inthepmjmsPSWMP. perfomdomalongthebottomofthemom iopipewrlbeusedmallow for initiation into the native m8
Recommended Mifigatim Measures: None hetuihaL
IX. ( 4 d) lass Than SiVificaat fmpaclL
The Project will alter on-site dh-aiwge by increasing the area of impmdmu surfaces. However, this increasein mnoffwill beoffsetby incorporatingBMP'sdesigmilinaavNancewith theCity of Sarna Rosa east County of Summa Law Impact Development ( LID) Technical Design Manual in achieve volume capture and heaunent rluirnnents which will control and minimize the potential for nasion, silatia4 and flooding
Recommended hfitifpfion Measures: None required.

Smndard Conditions of Approval ( COA)
El
The developer' sengineer shall comply with Wi raryurmmts of the latest edition ofrhe City Smadad Ufl m Siam Wawr Mitigation Plan Guidelines. Final plans shall include a Final Smnm Wan= Mitigation Plan,

STANDARD MEASURES
UevclopYs mgiveer shall comply with all mluu® rots of WeCity Standard Srnm Wmu Mitigation Plan GuideRoes using Low Impact Developmrnt ( LID) Bon Mamgmm Practices AMPS). FivdPlansshalladdressWestormwrterqualityandquaWryalmgwiWamain[mance ag,emmt or mmpamhle documentto assurecmtivums mvntrnaace of thesourcead tieament The Nodh Const Regional Wates Quality Cmnol Bond may approve alternative mitigation, Submitlandsapeadirrigationplansincoot withReWaterE enatLedscape Cntinarce adopmd by the Sams Rosa City Ccuocit Resolution No. 27518, on Novmber 17, RealPlaintidohePlansdwiththeBuildingPermitAllowanceneer. SubmitthefollowingwithT above-mentionedPlans: MaximumAppBdWrt«Allowance (AppadixA)andHYdmvanecable ( Appedia B).

A Final
ooaevdrtdUrban
StromWaterMitigationPlan (RW)isSoPincusinglnwttiacpevelopmmt ( LID) Hest Mmagmmt Practices (BMP) is m be incl W d wiN tM Buihliog Permit applimtioa
Ahmative appmach« b mitigating serer waterimpactsmay be appovd by theNonh Corot Regioml Water Quality Conwl Board
M.( by) NoImpact Thepmjm siteisnotb aedwithina Roodvane (SantaRosaGenerdPlan 2035Figurel2- 0). As auch,[ he Pnapoud PmJm is mtmtiopatd to exposepmplewshuctw« too ofaicmtridhor
los4ijaryorexpmtol Roodmg,includingHoodingssaresdtoforfailureofa levee or dam, oris Wesite exp« td m h impnd by iouodetionby sriche, tsmmd ormudRow.

R« ommmdd Mitigation Measures: No mitigadon required
Sources: 1, 2, 5, 11, I5, o6, 17.

Comment: The Project has We Potrntiel mimpact water quatiry. Howev«, whrn uvifomdy applied developmrn polis« and standards sct forth in theGrnerd Plan; Sdndard Coditioas ofAppmval, and measures foodaWeSUSMPare
EMdmthe
Pryec4the%hffieoil isdonofsignRuTheSmmRosaGerperdPIm3035EAtdmamimdMatimp" lmlrnmtionofaiSemaRosaGenerala2-2035policies, H4i) lgyadwrtmqualityimPec4worldbelessthinvgoifi«m. (GPE1RTable 2- l: H- 1 tlaoupp Hb). 49 eareaeaul Leis-Il baa- Less -Than- No
Significant slpnlfiant Significant Impact
Import with Impact
MitigationIncorporated
X LAND USE AND PI. ANNDVG
Would the prefect:
a Phycuca] a divide en established
community? ®
b. Conflict with any applicable land use
plan. policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdictim over We pjat
imiuWa6, but not limital to the ¢meal
plan. specific plan, l« al coastal ®
program, or zoning insurance) adopmd
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating
an wvnonmatal ¢ Bat?
c CovflictwiW enyapplimble habitat
rvatimplananntmal commuviry ®
conservation plan?
Discussion
TheProjectsitehumbetamticpmed fordevelopmentsinceMsmh 14.2006whentheCity County apPmvN and adopted a Geceml Plan Ameodmor from the General Industry m the Medium Ikosiy Residentiallandusedesigmuouanda RezowngfromtheIG (GeoemlIndustry) to theMulti -Family Residential/I8antaRat2035Generaluim(ResoludonNo. 36519).Tbirm Dewazincludedin
We
currentCityofSantaRosa2035GaealPlancmti6wiw2009asaMdimnDmin haid
nesinshe. ThepreposeralPlainusefortheProjectarewmisrarwiththepolices, objectives, andlmdusesInch¢ amort General PWn The Pmjar proposes a gats residariel community of 107aparmeors. The aparmmrs will include 33 one -bedroom, 64two-bedroom, and10Wrce-bdmora unitswithin 5 buildings. Thebuil&ngcomplex cassette of I iwo- s[ory, 3 three -miry, and 1 mixed Wore and f - tarry building Amenities imlude a leasingoffcel intemetcafe, clubhouse, kitchen- wineswinge, malfitrcsscater. Publicpaltering areas. such asa swimming pool, bocce ball area and community gardem are also included. Heights rangefrom 22 R. for therwo-storybuilding to 42 R fa the four-moryportion ofthe rh / fore -story building. Covered and unaverNparking is pmvidal as web azpnvamhirycle maagelakers. The Pmjat site adjoint the SMART and rneksm We east Aa transition ofran Project ismpmvndeawell- desigvresidential rental immunity whoa sant will become riders ofOm SMART pail end ni ' a+ rbe pmbior ambirycle Insularityalong We SMART mil corridor.

The Pmjar is a CalGreen project and will sin a design saidard for We : 10 ares of undeveloped medium density tensional to We wesVaonhwrn-
L'
X( a-c) Less thou Sisputfiuvt Impact The site is situated in ameal- use area 0013,31sfingOfUXIUVI al development to fle ooM and south; the SMART not tracks and single- nmy, esteched, low m medium dmtity raidenfial oneto tim: one; and, plannedfor mdimu residentialdevelopmeircto the m mnlwesc Ahhough the Project will annAuce residential development along this pmYon of Dutton Avenue, WeProject is a pottion of a plamel for multi- family residential mea. the adjacent iodunnal uses areran- twsious to moue rad do not mise icsuec regrading compatibility Asses.® g the pmlect in context. We Project will not P6YsirsRY divide an esmbfishd contmmity and, therefore, will mosmimpact
TheProjectis consistentwith WeexistingMaiium DensityResidentialOenemlPlanlandux desigmtiouwhich wasappliedmtheprogxsy by actionof theCity CoatedonMamh14, 2006and subsryueodyincludedio Wescopeofmview of theCity of SeemRosa2035Gemml PladEixtalER 2009 The Project is enmismnt wild We Genmal Pla %the applicable mwog regulations and design guidelices.

Recommended M flpdm Measures: No miogatim required.

Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11.

Cammmc The Project' s land Use impoera am Leas than Sigrtificam The Santa Rasa Gennal Plan 2035 Elft detammed Westhsou6h the implementatim of the Santa Rua General Plan 2035 policies all 1 Use Imports iminding poieotial comulvive impact wouldbe LesstWn Sigmficaut( GPEM Table 2- 1: A- 1 through A- 3). The Project is consistent with the applicable policies of the Genael Plan The Roject has been found to haven Ind Use impacts.
pomntiall) Lis- nan- L Tbau- No
Significant Sigaifiaaot Significant Impact
Impact with Impact
MitigationIncorpormed
M. MINERALIbESO11RCES
World Meproject:
a Resitinthelossofavailahiliryofa
4mwn mnaal ramrme that would be
of value to the region mod the residents
ofrhevmwe
b. Rsult in the loss ofavaJabJiry ofe
Iou11Y- wryonavr miverm resowce
rcovery caredelincomei on a local
tmeral plan. specific plan or odor land
use plan?
M. la -b) No Impact. Theprojectsiredom not cunmwany locallyor regionallysignifieammireml es. The proposed development of Ne project site wW rot care an adverse impact own locally or regionally significant mineral resources sweet on such rrnmces have been identified on rhe project sire.

Rctmmecndol Mutilation Meaames: No mitigation required
Stainers: 1. 2, 10. 15, 1&
Commrn[ The Project has no potential m impact on mineral resoumec Discussion: A mise amlyysis was oor ctd for the Project by Illingworth& RMkin, Inc., acoustical andairgmliry an6inems. Th rgen wdutheWlivaestabliandioW Noiwmd Satay Elemem ofthe Sano Rox Gennal Plm 2Dl5 and arsoorpmying ElRf dm baso ofthisamlysu. 53 Powntiafiv L Tbaw Ler n- No
Significant Sigwfimnt Significant Impact
ImWct xith Impael
JtitigationInrorpomtd
XD. NOISE
Would We ptojct result w
Expovne ofpesmos to prgmererim of
micelevelswexcesslgmcWpbieatablishd m dm local general PLm or mice ordimme. mapptirable smdeN. s
ofoWmagmcies?
b. Expoatoeofpermoatowgmemrionof
ceasive 8tondborm vbmtionm
mend boom mise levels+
c. A subvtanrial pormaoent wcrmsem
ambient noise levels in We project
ardry above levels exisring widmm
the prspsl?
d A subnanutd tmtponry or perp
vxxeax in ambient mitt kv in the
project Acwtya ve levels existing
wiWouttheprojs
e For a Project locatd within an airport
lad use Plan or, when such a Plan has
not been doped, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airpwq
would the ptojW exposepeople
residing m working N de Projert arm
to excessivemix leve6?
Fara project within tlm vicmiry ora
private aira np, would theprojat
expox people ding or workingm
W e project arm to excesve mix
levels?
Discussion: A mise amlyysiswasoor ctd for the Projectby Illingworth& RMkin, Inc., acoustical and airgmliry an6inems. Th rgen wdutheWlivaestabliandioWNoiwmdSatay Elememofthe Sano Rox GennalPlm 2Dl5 and arsoorpmyingElRf dm baso ofthisamlysu. 53 The Cin of Smm Ross's General Plan esmblishu mise and land use compatibility standards mm are used m evaluate a project' s compatibility with the noise environment- Middlingly residential land uses art acceptable- in noise environments of 65 MA DNL or less.

The site is bordered by commertial laud use; onthe nob, south, and muthwest, opposite Dutton Avenue The SMART railroad nulls border the site to the eai, win residential lad ism on the opposite side of the omelet.

A mise monitoring survey was performed to quantify and characterize ambient mise levels at the project site between Thursday, Manch 2, 2017 and Friday. March 3, 2017_ The mise rnvimnmeot at the sitetough; primarilyformvehicularmndcalongDmon AvenueandSMARTmainsalongthetribunal hatr SMART brain operations arecurrently in the outing phase ad without current olmtioml quiet zones, flu trains are blowing then hoot
W. la, b) Ism than Significant Impact with Mitigation Iumrponted. As indicated, a who mimrwgsmveywreconductd Theresultofnidsurveyissummaiv Table6ofthetepon.

The survey boundthat in all cases, the mise maturity from traffic along Instant Avenue would remain within the` memigIy mcepmble' rangeof65 dBA, as establishedby Genets Plan policy. Flame exterior mise mvirommn¢ were also amlyzW. The report frond the future umnitigatd inflate mise would not exceed me 65MA noise level established by the General.

SMART train mallfreight mainnoisewould continueto be theprdominam noisesourcealong the museumboundary of me project site. The SMART Supplemental Cllr, dated Mash 2008, resumes the ventilation of Quiet Zonasin SantaRia„ which wouldreducenoiseimpactsresulting from future passenger and freight maws along the conidor. Since the project site is located between the at -grade reboundcrossingsm BellmoreAvem: andW. RoblesAvenue, it is assumedthatm ^= presia. by the site would be traveling no fasterthan 25mph Fume mise levelsalong theNorthwesternPacific Bail corridor, as dumbed in the SMART SCIR Revised Cb kdive Impacts Sectio dated March 2008, are ernes d to much 60311A DM at a distance of 50 feu, assming a train sped of 25 mph w the Smu Rosa mra Therefore, the fume rummaged traffic mix eaposne at sedeastmn faille of flueproposed project site is ciderdamd to be up to 52MA DNL, which mould be below the City' s 65dBA DNL threshold for eaetior mise rnvimnmrn¢ at multi - family residmuai bud units Given the existing and funoe noise envimmmrnt the tabour mix environment may exceed the Genital Planpolicy of45dBA 6r wgw- r® e mise win willows pmtiallYopen Theprojet description includes and the project' s construction plans will include all mmstrretion methods recomenerided in the mise analysis. These cowarimmoo mesMds exceed smadard connnsctim requirements ad will appearm the bwlding plans. With the wcoryomtion ofconstruction method to reducepotentialnoiseinform thePjest achievesconsistencywin GeneralPlanpolicyregarding Noise.

Recommended! Mitigation:

Building Construction Plans shall incorporate aB recommendations found in the noise andysis:

Attaining the necessary, noise rdudon from exterior- utintemor spaces is readily achievable winproperwallconamctimiecWtiques, sheunitsysoofpmperwindowsaddors, wstheincnrporasion of fond - ah mechanical vmtilatim systems. Said tecMiques are u follows:

The units in Building D along the mdherq smtherq and mourn faailm, shag use mridows and sfiding glass doors wiW STC ratings of STC 35 to 38. Along the wmtan fafade ofBuRdivg D, willows and sliding glass doors will STC raunga of STC 28 to 31 would W required.

The tons in Buildings A and B along the mdhcrq souWmq and western fspadm, shaft use windowsandStmoigplassdoorswill STCmmW of STC26to28. Therummungroador would need windows and sliding plass doors with STC ratio;+ ofSTC 26 In 31 W achieve Immior mise smodaMs. All of( he roes Wthe proposal buildings should also be p avidad some( offolcod air mechoniml vmWarion, satisfactory in the local building ot5ciaLto adequately vmtilme the intmm spaceofWe units what witalows are closed in mmol No ImprL The pmleet will not add asulmaotial pamanmt indm W the motion mise level
Recommended Mitigation Memories. None regoiraL
XD. ( d) Leas Mao Siguifirant Impact wia Mitigation. Although ere surrounding Imi[ mod lack seditive rceptors, ere ambient mise envwvmmt could imrcaa at We more ofcoasvuctim.

Implementationof Wefollowing Mitigation Meavrms at Wetime ofbWIWM auction will imultin a Cess Wan Significant lorpam.

Recommended Maption Mmaure.

ImpleoemabooofWefollowingMitigationMmsureswouldradiumcaoso-uctionmouselevels i m umingfico thesumtolessthin significant, therebyminimizingdisnqmmandmmYmce.

1. MUNeandrommau ill equipment uoMm sire. All interval wmbuWim engine, d v gwlmml dull be fittedWm mufflon, whit are in good rovditioa Camel muclea shall resultin nm -i awt Trid; gaaatmg amuimtm Samelevel of 80 dB whom wadiaaoaof50f¢.

2. Utilize- gw' models ofav compoarmaM other otomy mise worm Wee mclmom6y airs.

3. Lome mamrmy wnw- geem irg mwpmmt asfar u posuble hod smdtive resaprors who semitiee re Nmrs idiom or are ter a damnattiw pmat urea Pmubit umaessary, idling of internal amlmlim urginea.

5. Prohibit construction workers' makes which ue audible on arljoiWm pmpermu& G ResNd nous- mmmarivgantromesat Wecommunion.nre or in areasw1jacat m 6e contraction siren We hours Mwea ]: W arm. writ ]: W p.m., Moody, through Friday, andg am d fi p.m. Seoodayawith rescvrsvucdoo is pemind on Surdeya wMholidwys
1_ Daraaumtarouorylobeamoeddmiwlpet ]:Wv.m. orpimm]:gla.m. MondayablehmsfyS. Limittherafficomni nturs
forlhedelm: formoppsmapipmarmmearmalarack mRrc rommg d and froomme sumfor my oppose to Monday rhmupp Friday Mwem 11p arm. and ]: UJ p.m.

9. Allrwablecomu tionhoursahull be PomM clearly cat avgv at me constriction

10. The com' hucdon protractor shall drsignmea se disrwbmce ciamiumpor who will be responsiblekr respondingin my local complvnn. bod rmmuction mise. 55 A telephonecountieshasNe diarvMnce caordwaror shallbe curtryicoously petal at the construction sire. ltie Dish W nce Coordinator sha0:

I. Reecieandarroarearaph, masabout conexructiondisturbancesawing sic clearing, u tan, inlnatructlne installation. road buildiug, residential cormorants. and site mha convection ncdrides.
z Mmnise thecausels) andimplmmr rtmedinl mmrvrn asnaxssary to Active signifimr problems,

3. ClesdY protWs' ha name and phase canonicals) on a cost at the construction site4 Notifymastrai4n6ofcomtrucdanamuses, schedW4andpension rmincu.

M. ( a and 0 No Impact The project site is located + l l miles from the Cbmles M S Wls/ Stnoma Car Airport, ctrl is outrideof theAirport LeadUsePlat planningarea Thepmjct siteis not lacteal nem a public or Privme airport, and therefore would nesbe subject m air- tmRic relatW noir impacts.

Recommended Mitigation Mortes: No mitigation remained.

Souses: L 2. 3, 4, 11, 18.

Comment TheProject a Nous impacts are Loss door Significant with Mitigation lvcorpormedThe Hansa Rosa General Plat 2035 EM deremined the through We implemmntion ofrbe Saam Ron General Plan 3035 policies ell Noise Impacts including potential cumulative impact would be Les thea Significant ( GP EM Table 2- 1: E- 1 through E- 5). The Pjct is conSlsrrnt w5W We applicable policies of We General Plan
56 Discussion
XII. ( a). Less roan Signifimat Impar. APjmlwould be wrLsiderdgown- inducing Sit wereto providenesvhousing, new employmm or expandexisting -nfmcm , R not Planed fmby ne City' s Germal Plan. The Project site was the subject of General Plm Ammdmm[ ad Rezoning m specificallyallowMilium Demiy Recidmtialdevdopmmt (8— ISuWWaae). TbePjmx would provide 107newwool uwts andupgradetsmstimginliaswetme tone extort mgulnal by tory rgWahoos. Given ne consistencyofne Projecttiro nc city' s long wage pimming documents, tM Pmjecl is not comide grown inducing.

RemmmndM Mitigation Memories: No mitigation rur uv nt
Thisdesignmiwpermitsarangeofhouswgty mcludingsinglefamilyatmcbedarWmultifamily developments, anduwtrnded tm specific went whore higher dcmity is approprime. The sire is urrmadYvacantTherefore, developmentwill notdisplaceesiainghousingorpersonsresidingw said housing nor displace substantial numbers of people during Oreconstruction phase.

M.( b<). No Impact The site is aresidentiallydesigoatM, vacamsite. The Pmjat will neiner dihylxe housingunitsnorsubsmntidnumbersof people. TheProjectwill havenoimpact.

Recommended Mitigation Mnsurn: No mitigation rryuvaL
Sources: L h 111.
41 Polentuth L s -naw L Thao- No
Simiricmt Significant SigoiGcaul Impact
Impact with Impact
NWgmismIncorporated
W. POPIR. ATIONANDRODSING
WouldtheP ject
a. Induce subsuotid population growth in
pr arm, eined e, by
roposimgvev hoopswal b
oosmiY( finrexampen«
traomugphl
Ll El Ll
exeoaion ofmads or aver
err r.. • nme)?
b. Displace substmtid numbm ofemaung
housing merssiraring rite mrsmetiom
of replecemrnt housing elsewhere?
c_ Displace subsamod numbers ofpeople,
ecessimumgdmmomuction of
replacement looming etmsvhere?
Discussion
XII. (a). Less roan Signifimat Impar. APjmlwouldbe wrLsiderdgown-inducingSit wereto providenesv housing, new employmmor expand existing -nfmcm ,R not Planedfmbyne City's GermalPlan. The Projectsite wasthe subjectof GeneralPlm Ammdmm[ ad Rezoningm specificallyallow Milium Demiy Recidmtial devdopmmt (8— IS uW Waae). TbePjmxwould provide107 new wool uwtsand upgradetsmstimginliaswetmetone extort mgulnalby tory r gWahoos. Givenne consistencyofne Projecttiro nc city's long wage pimming documents, tM Pmjeclis not comide grown inducing.

RemmmndM Mitigation Memories: No mitigationrur uv nt
This designmiwpermitsa range ofhouswgty mcludingsinglefamily atmcbedarW multifamily developments, anduwtrndedtm specificwent whore higher dcmityis approprime. The sireis urrmadYvacant Therefore, developmentwill not displaceesiainghousingor personsresidingw said housingnor displace substantialnumbersof people duringOre constructionphase.

M.( b<). No ImpactThesiteisa residentiallydesigoatM, vacamsite. The Pmjatwill neiner dihylxe housingunitsnor subsmntidnumbersof people. The Projectwill haveno impact.

Recommended Mitigation Mnsurn: No mitigation rryuvaL
Sources: L h 111.
41 Comment: Aprojectwouldheconsideredgrowdr-inducingif it weren providenewhousingnew employment, orexpanda stingfill odour art planocdfor by dreCity'sGeneralPlan. Thedensity of dm Pmjct is consistent with and has been aotiripated by the Gema) Plan The Saw Rost General Plan2035EM detemdnedthatdrehoplemmttationof theStartsRon GeneralPlan2035alongwith potewal development in the surrounding regiw would not be expected to nuadt in cumulaVve impacts to Population, Housing and Employment, Per Tablc 2- I: B- 1— B-3. The Project has been found to have an Population and Housing impacts.

XIV. PUREICSERVICF
Would the project result in substantial
edvcse Phyanl impacts associatM with the
provision of new or physically altered
govemnrenmlracgonafw neworphyally, cealtered governmental ilitsties. rarecoosvuctiovofwhichimpaHusetoonttnvt accimnmenulimpacts, in order to maivmiv acceptable service ratios,
respome D. ves m oW m performance
objectives fir any of the public amices-
n Fire pmtctioo?
b. Pvlicepromcdon?
u Schools?
d. Part?
e Other public facilities?
Discussion
PotentiallyLessicat Leccihav- eon[ ImpactImpvet
ImpactImpact wk1JL ImpactImpact
MdInewptiooIomrporated
XIV.( a<) I. ea mrn SlguiRnvtlmpaut Thepjeer ate is1pcmdvrithwdteCity ofSmm Rosaand wouldrmmpollecnmrynscutuswillFirepmtatiy
thervices
wol ice
Dcpaurd
by the miry of
SantaRosaPoliceprotectionurvicipwillbeprovidedbytheCity'sPoliceitePNnettTheprojectsnosutntwith[hebuildoutaconfinerobytepmenimpactPlanemthePmjenisIncwtheBellevueSctoolDistrictAmmberofdevelacofimpactfeesarerequirNmbePaidforimpactofWecitynSsnmRosaThepual mtVithe
Capactfssisies, Watr, OffWer
eingthe
impact of
onmMonaryisongmtmureofsenaf. swillFacilities, Water, Wastewater, PadtandRxreatiomAQordebleHousingandSchoolimpact! will herequiredrobepaidatdtecomeof partofvgpttmitdevelopmente. FeespeculiarmthebvundminofSouthwestAreaPlaymayberequirdaspert ofPmjst developmrnt Recommended Mitigation Measures: No mitigative required Standard Condition of Approval:

Evideoceshowivgpaymntofpmhdevelopmntf wJlbeprov WPriorro Ciryicwance ofanybuildingpermits.
59 Source: 1, 2, 3. 11.

Comment: The Pmjecfs Public Senices impacts am Less dvv Sipnificant The Savo Rosa Ger Play 20335ERRdmamined Net thmugh the implementation of the Santa Rosa Gmen1 Plan 2035 policiesall PublicServiceImpacuincludingpotrntialcumulativeimpalawouldbeLessdata Significant ( GP EM Table 2- 1: I- 1 Wmugh 1-7). The Project u comistm wiW Weapplicable policim ofNc Gemrdl Plan. Smvdaid Conditions of Appms'al will assureOmpayment of all applicable public semces impact( The Pmjoct has bxafound to have m Public Service impacts. m
pobndaM LessTban- L Thm- No
SigniGoot Significant Significant Import
Impact wiN Import
NutigationIncorporated
W. RECREATION
World We prjm:
a Increase rhe useof existing
oecce admrdreyowlParksoroMtM1urecrmtiavalt Times such rhm ® mbstuntiolwouldoccurdeinwa:eleatod? fazility would accwor be azcelmud? b. InclWe recreational facJities or rego' oe
We mvsircdun or espanvm of
recreetiood Gcitities, whicM1 might have ®
an adverse phyuical effect on rhe
endrmnene
D' sruss- odlmoacis:
a, bA I Than Significant Impact The Prject is a 107 -unit raidcutial prject aotl would coo to W the need for overall Park and recreational dmaid The Project leasloomdd nmwatioval srolou
araugzsp
since2PmjectaMwOlberequiredropayPahDmffitsmmtofthePmjmatehasbredinMemusince2008andivfifMwmre, includingPmkstocarvethisandolder 20350
meMinthesmthwntogoadaotofMeCity, feesadcgatedadmdyaedindondforPlan injumThe
Prjut' s paymentofNe Ciry-s park in -lieu feeswould ofitt[ thePnjen' sdemandfor imra drarutiavel fuililies.

Snndad Condition ofnpprovd:

Eviderczshowwg Na wofmyappticablepm developnevtf willbepmvrddpnor to City isowme of any building permits.

Sources: 1, 2, 3, 11.

Commeat Tim Progect's Rmomoa impacts are Lers than Sigrlfimvt. The Santa Rosa Grum Plan 2035 M delmmind Westduough the implernmtatim of Me Sara Rasa Geovnl Plan 2035 policies all ParksandBranum Impactsawludm8porounalcumrlanveinput wouldbeLeansWm Sigrlfkant GPEMTkle2- I: P- Ithrau9h P-3) The Pnjectis mvsis[ mtwiW We applicable polities ofthe General Plan Standard Conditions ofAppmval w0l assure the payment of all apuhmdAe recreaaoval smoca' anpaztfees. The Prjot hasbeen found to have m Recreation impacts.

Potentially Lem - Thaw- Lesslhav- No
Significant significant sigwWnt Impact
Impact aidl Impact
NegationIneomorated
XVI. T SMRTATIONaR IC
Would the project:
a CaMict wish an applieAble Plan,
ordinance or policy esabushing
easurn ofeffativet¢ t for Ne
ci] rystm,
talarg two
aofthe
taking into all mode mods
tof
trauporblion including masstrmsit andon incl ransit
motorized travel aW relevant
compmrentt ofthemeclauoo syrem,
including but not limitM In
fin . actionsansamgnwayaandmal bicycle pawn,
and matt uaysit? and
ones
rawol?
b. Conflict within applicable congestion
management Program, including. but net
limited to level of service standards and
travel demand meatm¢ or omr
smpdatdt estzblishM by the county
cougrsimt mamgmnem agency for
designmei toads m highways?
C. Result w a change in air traffic parents,
including either an inereau in traffic
levels or a cbmge in locamou dual resdts
N sobwofiaj safety risks?
d subsmtially woeau hazaNs due to
design future ( e g, shay curves or
dangerous wtasecumm) or incompatible
umz ( e.g., fmm equipmmQv
e. Rem t in inadaluate emagemy m me?
f. ConOict with adopted police; plans, or
pregrAma regarding public tramit,
bicycle, or pedestrian fmdifim or
otherwise decrease the perF eor
safry ofsucb f citiues?
fit
Potenumul L Than- Lessnar- No
Significant Significant Sigwfirant Impact
Impact pith Impact
i C 1 D
hlitigation
M LOS
mcurpora"
LOS
msemwon
XVI. ( a -b) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incarpanted. A Traffic Impact Study for theProjectwasprepardby w -Tram, comwdun =Mc enginema_ Thereposu decd1WY20, 2018.

This report carves as the basis forthis malysis- Opa gconditionswereevniomdduringrheam T:OOto 9-W) ad p.m. (4:00W600) peakpmids. Thiswasdooeinor lerto chane thehighrat potential impacts for the proposed Prnjoer aswell as the highest wlumm ® the Ieml franapOtfefion neavork. The report sordid the munsxuom of Bellevue Avenu non Avenue and Todd Rnad5tandish AveoueGbilothn Avemre. Level of Service ( LOS) is natal to mnkvaMe operation on various type of fxilifies basil on " Me volorm s and roadway capacity using a series of later desigoa4wsrao®agfromA toF. Generally, LevelofServreeArepreents flee Bowcoodifionsand Level of ServiceF representsforced Bow or breakdowncondifioe, By policy Wecity of SantaRom General Plan strives to maintain a LOS D along ser roadways.

Cwdtiona— Peak Bow
SeM Intenectiov FaWSCan
FplpreIwPM-Lrvai
StudyStnd Intersection AM PnIr
Bellevue AveiDulron Ave
PM Peak
i C 1 D
wch M LOS Deh LOS
Bellevue Avenud0aten Avmm 152 C 22. 0 C
Todd RdSfmdish- Ghilom Ave. 132 B 49. 4 R
Northbound- Ghilotfi- A 12. 6 B 12A B
SouWbwvd— SmdishA h 69. 1 F 120 F
LOS: Fvinre Covditiays avd Fvtvre Plw Pm' ecrCwditiow— Peek Bow SeM Intenectiov FaWSCan
FplpreIwPM-Lrvai FM- AM - LOS PM - LOS AM - LOS PM - LOS Bellevue AveiDulron Ave C i D i C 1 D
Tadd RdStmdish- 0hilotfi Ave C I D C I D
Aa shownN dm above table, all will opeare a floe vme LOS with or without the Project IAS ares iaatallation Ofimpmvemen6.

The Traffic Analysis corcludd the following.

Theprojett is expected to generate av avenge of 212 new nips per dey ivcldwg 55 trips dutin& the am peak hour and 66 yips dudng Wep. m peak hour. 63 Ora1w Existing CoMiliws_ the study wtersections opame accrytably at LOC Cerr borer vwall during the am Peak how, however. Todd Roed/ Standuh Aven" I alotti Avenue operates aoacceytably at LOS E overall during the p.m peak hour.

The peal: how signal wamnt is tun Intent wgas, peak hour volamm at the imasccM1onof Todd Road/ Standish Avenwfihiloro Avenue. The peak how signal wanness is not met at the intauctioo ofFellevaeAvewe/DunonAvenueunderExistingw ExistingplusPmjct Condatiom.

Opan We addition ofproj v- genamst! traffic to Existing Comments, the study ivtermctiana are expcwd bmntinue operating acceptably during the am. punk how but Todd Road' Standish Avenue- Hh Avenueisexpmedtoderedomwto LOSFdomingthep. mpeak_ The increase in delay on the swWbound approach at Todd Roab Smndish AveoueGbilotti Avenue durwg tiro am peak period is greater than five secondsand is masidetN a sig dficant impamwda Cwmry StwdaMs.

OnderateassantFmwevoaxitoatMassaminuntly
during
bath peak
pwicprovements.

We
sudy mtersetiow are exlxmed w apemte accepmblY during both peek periods.

It is recommendedthattheCountyconsiderwattling atraffic signalatToddRoallSwMish Avenue- Ghiloni Avenue and resnping the Standish Avenue approach to provide a souWismul leftownlane in order b achieveacceptableopaatiw woler existing andfigure conditions, without or with thee project.

The prajat applicant should install aR-way stop controls, pabbipe the souWbawd Swashm Avenue approach to include a left- tum lane and tmoipe the westbwmd Todd Road approach to include a right two lane at Todd Rml/ SmnneshAven" l iloni Avenue to achieve aaeptable operations in & a short term
Aproportional shote contribution of 2.2 penent of the costs funded by private dove Wwwat should be paid twva the fame improvements; at Todd Rmi Smobsh Avertur. GbRmti Avenue mitwall a traffic signal udms such toss are ircludei in a= Me mpact See _ A proporticwl share contribution of 4. 5 pvcent of the cuss fundN by private development should be paid towards the grow impmvemems at Dutton Ave meMeRevue Avenue to install a traffic signal unless such costs me tnclu W in a baRc impact fee Pakstrian, bicyce. and transit f ilities ming the pmjaa saw are expectW to be " expose:

With the completion of project homage improvements.

Sight dismisses along Emaw Avenue a the pmjct driveway are adaIume for the approach speeds; however, parking should be prohtbitet along the projM fiomige for a distwee of 50 feet w tither side of the pmposM driveway.

Asouthboutdleft-tumlaw iswarrantedmalarFmmeplusProjectvolumesduringtheP.m Past: period The fianwge improvements should be croamo act at onwadnte a comer tumlaneonDuttonAvenuein Wefuture, providingleft-nunaccessa theprojectdriveway.

UM
Rxommended Mitigation Measures:

Parkingshallbepmhtbitd for a distanceof 50ft. aneithersideofNe Pmjct connote. This shall be shown on the imgovmrent plans.

As pmt of the Project Description and offe d by tineapptiewn, an all -way stop coulavIN aaripivg ofthe souNboimdStandishAvenue approachto include aleft -tan Ioneand the restriping of the westboundTodd Roadappmzchto handle aright Ownlaneat Tadd Road/ Smdish Avenue- Gluka i Avenue witl be handled -
I ApmWrtiovul share contribution of 22 Inerrant ofthe cwts handedby private development shag be Md towards the future impmvernamat ToddR Standish Aventa Cdtilona Avenue to ianall atrafc signal udm such exam are inchded in a OeRc impar fee.

I A Proportional share contribution of4. 5 percent ofthe casts frdd by Private development shall be pdd towards the forum impmvemam at Uumn AvenurlBeRevw Avenue to wsall a tmRc signal unless such costs are imludd in a traffic inpact fs XVI. ( c - d) No Impact The project site is loutal el l miles Into the Charly M Scbdb/ Somma Cowry AirWM, isoumideofW Ait " Land UsePlmplanomgvm Thepjc- lsiteisant locmd rwra Whkc orprivme airpom ThepmjctwWnotimpacta' o Wnerm p johns toconWratal pdesbir% bicycle and transit features.

Recommended Mltiptiou Measure: None requires
XVI. (e—i) I.eathanSibifiousImpactwithMisiBatioththrough torvtd.

ThePmjeubicycletoenhancepedestrianbicycleadpuhkeerasportaedeoppnpathanWmntheincludes thevoltityobeans,
bicyclelameneraures
rthe
SMARTiontheimpathandconnectiontinseWeoverallCityU,SengRosabicycle lam vmvmk Duswg contraction the foRowivg midgetion measunm are requkd m min mi traffic congction ad wl5c Innards.

Reeommendd hLtigation Measures
Emergeam Response/ frvffie Control
The appluant shall adopt the following traffic mum] protimes m minimize vatic congestion ad vatic hazards. As required, coostraction Ragging and signage. use of Plates. sod older safety meamrer shall heimm f cewrW Cnlnays21g6 ManmlofUdtonm TmfficCavol Devic¢ OWmmeasmes shdlimludc
I If temWmry lase or street closures are " aired, the applicant shill concoct consonancy response pmvidms ( i. e., hregn a % Whee, fire, ami ambulance) to determine if the streets impacted] are considered primmy, mutes.

I where construction ocessimtes lane or strct Closures along emergency respmcse toms, the applicant shall rmommed and ahead appmval of donate rates or dhow morns fiom the aRetd service pmvidem at a Moroccan ofom week Iran cwnsNction 65 During cmnvucdon rheappheam shall notify the ser pnvi on a weekly basis of W timing. location. and duration ofoos tim
The applicant shall mitnuan pc an and vehicular x to public facilifi s buamawa, and noidmca along the strut during commute boon and shall minimize We closure of pedesmao and vebiculm aaea at oder times. Pak commute hours are between ]: 00 AM- 9:00" m 14:00 PM - 6:00 PM.

Sour : 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 19,
M
67 powatlalla I nsn- I Than- No
sigWOcavt Sigailicaut Sigailac" I Impact
Impact mW Impact
MitigationInmrponlM
XVII. V IMSA SERVICESYMW
Wouldthep jest
a Exceadwaamwaterrt® mtM
tequittmuboftbe appHuble Regiovnl
Water Quatiry Control Board?
b. Require or reWt in We uoswcriw of
new water or waaewata n® m,® t
fmimm or espavuon of existing
famMm the construction of winch R
could taus significant wvimommal
effaa?
c Require or resuft in the uactro nn of
new storm water drainage faalitia or
expaysiwafexistin8 facilmRlhe
unshuatofwltir8cmddnussigaificmuvwvmutal eller?
d Have wtTici® t water supplier available
tosavethePmJctfiomstriatingecoentidmutsandtaomcemec
El 11®
utitlmeots ed+ or expatdrd veil
e Rech in a daemtination by We
w ewatapyempor copy serve projectpmixtthat it
lucs y the
pniedequtecapncitymurve
pjecrspjecreLdeingalto the
commuctenn
provider' s existing ummibnen¢?
C Re by a lanclM with sufficient
pamivdcapacitytoaccommodam the
Mimes solid warn diapnWv is?
g. Comply vnth li k , state, aM local
satrves and regWations relatM to slid
wave?
67 Discussion
XVII. (e -g). LessWanSigaificsntImpact TheProjectwoulddevelopavacantpnpeny nowa mNium densityresidentialproject of 107aparenmt mim The Pmjeercan beservedby City water and w2nomate' teenmmt fazilities mMAam water thump faaliues. All improvementsnecessaryaspmt of jest developmentwill be donein compliancewith the latestadoptedcity stavdmds. The project is a mcliumdmsity residential dcaigmmd site, development ofwluch is fully mnsisteni with the Gm" Plan Standard City conditions win wire compliance with the Seem Water Mitigation Plan Guidelines, imludiogi lane mofineasmesrequiringmeofhesmamgementpractices.

Atkq melandfillcapacitywouldcontinuetoea at Conroyand/ or Countywma facditiesm support future develapmmt.

Recammendecl Mitigation Mevoen: Norse requi d
Comment: The Project' s Utilities and Services Systems impacts are Less Wav Sigoifimnt The Santa Rosa General Plan 2035 EM detennind that through the ivmlemmmtimoftlre Sarna Rosa Gmeml Plan 2035 policies all Utilities and Scaices System impacts imludiogpmentiul cumulative ingwct would be Less than Significant ( GP FIR Table 2- 1: 6- 1 through G -( i). The Project is consistent with rhe applicable policies of the General Plan Through the application ofStaodmd Conditions of Approval, the Project wJl adhere to all Rest Management Practices reposing water use and water quality. The Project bas been found in have m UtWties and Smvrim Systemsimpacts 0 Pateouall} LefsThao- L s-naa- No
Significant Significant Siguifioot Impact
Impact rich Impact
Nitigtionmcorpontd

OF SIGWICA CE
Would dm pryece
a Dorn thepmjxt have the potmtielm
de® ode the quality of Ne eoviroummt,
substantiallyseducedmhabim of a fish
wildlife spxiq cause a fishor
wildlit populationmdropbelow
self-smtea
tbsmtevm
pint
elima
nit or mmmmiry,
crestredure the number orseshint she magetinem
of a sore or mdavgered Plant or animal
io exampl
majorjot of
Calm
tory orperiods ofGlifomuhutory «
pointspehiuory?
b. Dornthe Pmjethave impeca that ere
individually limital, but cimuladvcly
nsidereble?(- Cumulatively
nsiderable" means shat the
remrnul eflecls olapmject are
nsidemble whew viewed in muoectim
ofpant pmjmc the
e;
ntsofffxo
effxaofpshxmmmm
the
pruic,andeffect ofprohable forme pmjxb)?
c. Dori the Project lave mvimvmeoml
effects wticb will moose submntial
adverse effects on human beings, eiiber
disxtly or indire y?
Di : ussiou
X 11I. (a) Lea Than Sig fieaat Impact Thepmjxt isIocalmdwithin tiroSalm EaseUrban Orowlh Boundaryand potrntial impxts aaocimed with itsdevelopmenthavebeenanticipamdby the City' s General Plan and analyzed in the Gmeml Plan EM The project is consistent with the General Plan Imd Use desifnmorm, goals, poficies ped programs. Mm Projen will not degmde dm quality of the envuovment reduce habiut.« affxt mltoml irnomcea glmef , thee jecl' s impact as regards emuomnenml degradation is comideral lea dmu significant XWH. ( b) Lea Than Sigoifimt Impact: The proposed project is comistcnt with the City' s General Plan land use designation for the siw and the City' s long- moge Plan for fume development The project dna not moussedseseventy of my of dmimpactsInto dmlevels identified amdanalyzedin 69 dreGMeml PIM En The project doesouthavede potential to create .m)«^` flat areindividud ly limited, bmcumulnthely considerable. Theref , the projects cumulative impacts will h less dun tigNficant
X{' II .( e) fns Than Significant Impact. ne pmjax has tan pmnttial to result in adverse impacm to humans due to air quality, water quarry, cultural resourea, noise, and torus enation and circulation- However, with the applicanon of Standard Conditions of Approval, implementation of Bax Management Practices and adherence to applicable goals and policex the Projects direct irdirect and cumulative impacts are corssiderd Less than Signifr® nL Sources: 1 duough 19
70 SOURCE REFERENCES
ThefollowingisaB ofmf a mW preparauonofthisdacumrns UNesavacbal herein, copies of all ref repmis memorandums and te0m areon file wah the City of Santa Rosa Planning and Economic Development Department Re( a to Publications prepared by Federal or State agencies toy, he found with the agency responsible for providing such information.

1. City of Sante Rosa Gmeml Plan 2035, 2009

2. City of Santa Rasa Final MIS. 2009
J. City of Santa Rosa Zoning Cade, 2006

4. my of Santa Rasa Design Guidelines, Selaember 2005( upcad in 2010, 2011)

5. City of Santa Rose Climate Action Pim

6. City of Santa Rosa Water Efficient LanAv+T Ordinmwz. Ordinance 4051, adoptM daobv 27, 2015

7. Sema Rosa City Code: Title 17 Enviramrnml Protecnm Chapter 17-24. Trey Ordinance 2858, 1990;( Indicator 3699, 2005)

8. BayAreaAir QualityMenag®eotDistict CEQAGuihttirm ,May2010

9. BAAQMD Website sial Significance llueslrolda, 2010

10. Soil Web University of Ca iMrais at Davis; NRCS

11. Project Plats:
w Archiuxurd
b. Lmdsaping
c. Grading and Dminege

12. BiolagiW Base0te Stationary and Impact Evaluation for the Site in 3150 Dmtot Avenue, Scam Rasa. Summa Cowry. Charles A. Paterson Plant Ecolog Apr027, 2017.

13. Biological Rewurce A cnt 3150 Dorm Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA. Td P.

Winfield Ph. D. August 14, 2017.

14. HismanalResourcesSandyof 3150atm Avenue, SantaRose, SommeCounty, Califaw ia. Tom linger& Asannta. Marrh 6, 2017.

15. Phan 1 Eovimmiental She Asa¢ smwt 3150 Dutton Avemre, Scare Rose, Cdif rma.

Envimmnrnml Geology Service July 12, 2016.

16. So0a Invesuganao 3150 Dtaot Avenue Saw Rose, Califomia YES! Young Eng reering Services- Gmtecbtial Consultants SVtembn 21, 2001.

17. I W]& mm Wmer LowhVp Oevelupm Submivall' m3l501Tdmn Avew Sante Rosa,C Adobe Ac iaws, Inc Civil Eupmauia& Land Surveyin& Wtutwter. July 17, 2017.

18. Fnvuovmeoml NoiseA mmIJISO Dutlon Avenue Smu Rove, G. Wing orth& RoWdn. Acouuti • Ah Quality. Apn14. 2017.

19. Tn c lnu act Study for a R dmualP jest at 3150 Dmmn Avevue W -Tuns, Tnd Eu® nena. O mb 10, 2016
73 PROJECT SPONSOR' S INCORPORATION OF MRIGATION MEASURES As the pmlm sponsor or the authored Ment of the project sponsor. 1. . Wosllty miler upoiL have re.ie d the Initial Smdy for The Dutton Avenue Resldeam and have / pvticWarly reviewedall mitigationmeasumaol m ainninngpogromsidentifiedherein. 1 acceptthe findings of the Initial Studymid mitigation mmsures andherebyagreeto mdit% the poposedpjest applicationsnow onfile with theCityof SsnmRosato includeandmcorpomtc alI mitigation measmes and monitoring witrama set not in this Initial Sauly.

Proj nenrfaffihonoM agenp Dine
City of
Santa Rosa
rCmmronyDrsdopawa

DUTTON AVENUE DEVELOPMENT
3150 outcome Avenue
Asmasar Parcel No.: 01} 133- 013
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Lead ASency.

City of Sane Rom
Planning and is Uevelopmwt Depurnamt
I00 Smre Rom Avc, 10u. 3
ane Rina, CA 95401
Conran: Patrick Snceler, Smlor Plemv
Date: Octalecr 9, 2018

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IVTRODUCCION
TheCalifomiaEnvinnmentalQualityAct (CEQA) requiresMetwhin apublicagencyhasmade findingsMatrnitigatim meaurssarermluimdanavoidor svbsmntiallylessensignificantadverse mnemalimpactsid® tiSW in Me Initial SnulyMliUgatN NegativeDeclaratioq Meagmcy shall adopt a prumam fm monimrmg or nporring on the mitigation to mama Me mitigation implemented. This% uttamonMonimring arM ReportingPmgram( hIIr1RP)has beenpreparttlto ensureMeeffmtiveimplemmmtionof themitigationmeasuresthatMeDesi Review Board adopted aspan of its approval of Me Duum Avenue DevelWatentP jmt TheCity ofSantaRosa, asMeImdagencyfor Mepmjmt, is responsiblefor a roonrgamd vwifyivg that each mitigation measure is implemetrtd. The MMRP establishes Me fr® ewo& Me City will use to implement the miligatim measures adopted in connemion widt pjm approval, and Me of such haplemmmtion.
l ngmt
r
l
all]
A§\
i. g§ 1
WH` A
A @$ q@
A§ U Q
Sri
A+ mm
it.
12 AAUaa f _

12b9 i gJg [
gjai
fi73 $
F91 q
m E
3!
all A e
l. A:
a
7\
Z2 1
Rj\ m_.
gig
is @ii
3_3p
S'
e14ia-
13gjj
x
z'# Mill
C 1B f? 1! - 2
Ciry of
Santa Rosa
Y mm,ll,Dr D,.

DUTTON AVENUE DEVELOPMENT
31% Dutton Avenue
Amasor Parcel No.: 041133- 013
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Lend Agency.

CirrafSaom Rosa
Plmoin% 100SantacseAve.,
Rmlfhpvommr
100 Sema Rosa Ave., Rm. I
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Contact Patrick Streets, Senior Planoen
Dore: QvabQ 9, 2018

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

INTRODUCTION
The California Envimvmmwl QualityAct ( CEQA) sryuotn thanwhm a public agwmy has made fiodings Natmidgatimmnsnvamtequimdmavoidw. wbnan ylu sigoifirantadverse mirorunexas] impacts identified in the Initial StudYlM agatd Negative Dmlarntion, flueagmcY shall adoptaprngmm for mowtoring mtcporting onthe mitigadmto ensureNe mitigation measures are mpl® rnted This Miogatim Mmaorw and Reporting Program( M ) has bon prepared to ensure the effective implemrnNOon of the mitigation measuresthat Ne Deign Review Board adopted as part of its approval of the IAhon AvenueD dopmant Pmjen.

T CoryofSenm Rosa, asNe Ind agencyfw Ne pmja is responsiblefor enfomint and verifying Nat each mitignion meawre is ivPl® emd. The MMRP wmblis theft voh the Cityw use mimpbonent Ne mitigyion measures adoptal m connection wiN pmjmt apptovaLandthemordmrmP/reportingof suchmaplmmtadoa
Almma
Ell
S; wAAf;§
Ap! @»
m
9 MIN
m 1ig I
A ±
au:

El3E
i E e " i' eyaa E E
jS
Seng
H
7Qa m/ A 9 %
3 m# A

Fir
E.
mm. 71ƒ
9,, j»
mgm
832- E".

Santa Rosa City CouncilJune 3, 2025

Santa Rosa City Council
June 3, 2025