Cities Index.
Presentation

Santa Rosa City Council
September 9, 2025

Document
Presentation
Meeting
September 9, 2025
Body
Santa Rosa City Council
Original file
430 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

CITY COUNCIL VOTING PROCESS FOR

CERT AIN APPOINTED POSITIONS
City Council
September 9, 2025
Teresa Stricker
City Attorney
1 Current Process -
City Council Vacancy
Charter Section 31 (a) provides either:
• Appointment by the Council; or
• Council may call a special election to fill the vacancy.

If vacancy is not filled within 60 days, Council must call a special election.
2 Current Process -
City Council Vacancy (Policy 000-23)
Where Council will appoint to fill a Council vacancy, Council Policy 000-23 provides that, following an application and interview process, Council may vote to appoint one of the applicants by resolution.

The Policy does not currently provide a process for how council will make the appointment if no applicant receives a majority vote.

3 If a majority of the Council cannot agree on the
appointment of one of the applicants, the Council may
adopt such other procedures to fill the vacancy as it
deems appropriate, but the process must be completed
within the sixty-day time period provided by City Charter Section 31.

Current Process -
Appointments to Boards,
Commissions and Committees
Section XVII of the Manual of Procedures and Protocols sets forth that all appointments to City boards, commissions, and advisory committees shall be made in accordance with the Charter and Council Policy 000 -06 – Appointments to Boards/Commissions/Committees.

Council Policy 000-06 sets forth the process for appointments by the full Council to boards, commissions and committees. These include:
• Design Review and Preservation Board
• Personnel Board
• Board of Building Regulation Appeals
• Housing Authority
• Santa Rosa Tourism Business Improvement Area Advisory Board
• Waterways Advisory Board
• Two members of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Board. 4 Current Process -
Appointments to Boards,
Commissions and Committees
The process for appointment is as follows:

Appointments may be made by a process of elimination or by motion.

If by process of elimination:
• Each Council member votes for the number of applicants = number of vacant positions + 2. If there are insufficient number of applicants, the Council votes for a fewer number as
recommended by the City Attorney.
• Those applicants receiving 0-1 votes are eliminated.
• Subsequent votes are taken with each Council member voting for 1 fewer applicants than in the previous round. Only applicants not eliminated may be voted upon.

There is no process governing how Council moves forward where the elimination rules end. For example, 3-2-2 vote.
5 Current Process -
Appointment of Mayor and
Vice Mayor (Charter)
Charter Sections 4 and 15 provide:
• Council elects one member to serve a
two-year term as Mayor following the
swearing in of new Council members.
• Council annually elect one member to
serve as Vice Mayor for a one-year term.
6 Current Process -
Appointment of Mayor and
Vice Mayor (Section XII)
Section XII of the City Council Manual of Procedures and Protocols process for election of Mayor/Vice Mayor:
a. Call for nominations.
b. Each nomination requires a second and acceptance.
c. If only 1 nominee accepts, that nominee is elected by unanimous consent. d. If 2 or more nominees accept, election is by process of elimination:
• Each Council Member votes by ballot for 1 fewer than total number of nominees.
• Nominees receiving 0-1 votes are eliminated.
• Subsequent votes are taken by roll call with each Council Member voting for 1 fewer nominee than in previous round. (only nominees not eliminated may be voted upon.)
e. Once a single nominee receives a majority, the nominee is elected.

As with appointments by the full Council to boards, commissions and committees, there is no process specified about how Council moves forward with selecting a Mayor/Vice mayor in the event of a 3-2-2 vote.
7 Recommendation
The City Attorney recommends that Council choose the same process for each of the three types of appointment processes:
• The Presiding Officer calls for nominations and seconds. • If only one nominee with a second, the Presiding Officer declares the nominee selected by unanimous consent.
• If only two nominees with seconds, Council Members vote, by ballot, for one of the two nominees. If Council gets stuck (3-3 or 2-3 vote), use random selection.
• The City Attorney recommends that Council consider one of the following section process options when there are three or more nominees with seconds:

1. Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV) + tie breaker

2. Process of elimination + tie breaker

3. By motion
8 Ranked Choice Voting (RCV)
Each Council Member ranks applicant preferences to fill a vacant Council seat from first to last choice.

If one applicant does not have a majority vote as first choice:
• Applicants with the lowest votes are eliminated
• Second choices of the Council Members voting for the eliminated applicants are reapplied to the remaining applicants
• Process of elimination and retallying continues until one applicant has a majority vote as the retallied first choice.

Should Council decide to use RCV, staff suggests that the City’s IT department assist by developing a systematic way to facilitate a real- time, ranked-choice voting process that provides transparency for the public and Council. 9
Ranked Choice Voting
10 Ranked Choice Voting:

Breaking a Tie
RCV can still result in a tie that cannot be resolved through RCV.

For example, 3-2-2 vote.

Staff recommends adopting a rule to use with RCV to break a tied vote that remains after RCV.

Options:
1) Run-off vote by ballot to eliminate one of lowest vote getters and then proceed with RCV.

OR
2) Random selection
➢ Mirrors random selection process the Charter requires for resolving ties when voters elect Council Members.
11 Ranked Choice Voting:

How to Break a Stubborn Tie?
If using a run-off voting to break a tie, there may still be times when RCV and run-off voting leaves
Council stuck.

When might this happen?
Council vacancy or absence may result in a 3-3
vote RCV cannot resolve.

Recommended Stubborn Tie Breaker?
Use random selection. 12
Process of Elimination
Council may wish to make appointments by a
process of elimination.

Elimination would require successive rounds of
voting, with 1 nominee eliminated each round
until a winner is selected.

Like with RCV process, elimination does not
resolve every case (3-2-2 tie for example). 13
Process of Elimination
Breaking a Tie
To break a tie, Council can pick from the same options as with RCV:
a) Conduct a run-off vote, by ballot, to eliminate one
nominee tied with the lowest votes, and then proceed
with elimination.

OR
b) Select from remaining nominees by random selection.

Recommended Stubborn Tie Breaker Rule?
Use random selection.
14 By Motion
Council may wish to consider making appointments by motion, by ballot.

Motions are taken one at a time, nominee-by-nominee.

Under Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, motions are voted on in the reverse order made.

Potential downside: The order motions are taken may impact outcome. ➢ Some may view appointment by motion as giving the Mayor too much influence over the selection.

May result in lost motions (no majority for or against) if there are only 6 Council Members present. For example, 3-3 or 2-3.
➢ Recommendation: Use elimination process to select from nominees not rejected by a majority.
15 Appointment
Type
Current Process Recommendation and Options
Vacant Council
Seat (when no
special election is
called)
▪ No selection process
specified following
application and interview
process.
▪ No method to get unstuck.

If 1 nominee = Appointed
If 2 nominees = By Motion (Ballot) +
➢ If stuck with tied/lost motions, use
random section
Select one of three processes to use if 3+
nominees:

1. RCV +
➢ Break ties RCV cannot resolve by
run-off vote OR random selection
➢ Break stubborn ties by random
selection

2. Elimination (Ballot) +
➢ Break ties elimination cannot
resolve by run-off vote OR random
selection
➢ Break stubborn ties by random
selection

3. By Motion (Ballot) +
➢ If stuck with tied/lost motions, use
elimination (above) to select from
all nominees not rejected by
majority.

Boards,
Commissions &
Committees
▪ By Motion OR Process of
Elimination by ballot
▪ No method to get unstuck
Mayor/Vice Mayor ▪ Process of Elimination by
ballot
▪ No method to get unstuck
16 Questions and Feedback?
17

← All documents from this meeting