Cities Index.
Presentation

Economic Development Subcommittee
October 13, 2025

Document
Presentation
Meeting
October 13, 2025
Body
Economic Development Subcommittee
Original file
953 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Local Preference
October 13, 2025
Jennifer Myles
Purchasing Agent, CPPB, NIGP-CPP
Scott Wagner
Interim CFO
Current Local Preference
 Ordinance approved in 1993, 1% (current local preference only applies to the procurement of goods and general services)
 Limited to a maximum of $5,000
 T o qualify, bidders must submit proof their principal place of business is located within the City limits, and a copy of their City business tax certificate
 Public works and Professional Services contracts not included  Adopted to promote local business activity
 Based on 1% sales tax return
Advantages and Challenges
Advantages:
◦ Support Local Economy.
◦ Meet Potential Agency Policy Goals.
◦ Potential Increase in Tax Revenue.
◦ Local preference may encourage local businesses to be more competitive.

Challenges:
◦ Increase in Cost: Agency may experience increased costs, higher prices for goods and services.
◦ Reduced Competition: Limiting competition by discouraging non-local businesses from bidding and reducing competition.
◦ Potential Favoritism: May create a perception of favoritism, lack of equal opportunity, or reciprocity with other jurisdictions.
◦ Lower Quality: May compromise highest quality goods and services if non-local bidders offer better value.
◦ *Resources: National Institute for Government Procurement (NIGP) 2015 Position Paper: Local Preference in Public Procurement Current Registered Vendors

Local Vendor Bid History
 Since December 2013, a total of 838 bid awards
were made with a total value of $84,753,199.58.

Of the 838 bids awarded, 162 bids were
awarded to local vendors at a value of
$22,719,146.20 (26.81%).

Classification Awards Award Amount Percent
Local 162 $22,719,146.20 26.81
DBE 18 $1,833,278.32 2.16
CADIR 145 $19,114,195.19 22.55
SRL 94 $5,850,230.12 6.90
None 311 $28,380,062.02 33.49
PQual 17 $784,799.51 0.93
FSD 37 $1,777,772.22 2.10
MBE 27 $3,223,942.26 3.80
WBE 27 $1,069,773.74 1.26
Overall 838 $84,753,199.58 100
Comparative Agency Policy
 Name of Agency %Preference
City of Alameda 5%
City of Bakersfield 3%
City of Redding 5%
City of Mountain View 0%
City of Roseville 0%
City of Rohnert Park 0%
City of Sacramento 5%
City of San Leandro 10%
City of Santa Clarita 0%
City of La Mesa 0%
City of Berkeley 5%
City of Napa 3%
City of Camarillo 0
City of Hayward 0
City of Corona 0
City of Carlsbad 1%
City of Santa Rosa 1%
Questions
and Comments?

← All documents from this meeting