Cities Index.
Appellant Presentation (Uploaded 02-24-2026)

Santa Rosa City Council
February 24, 2026

Document
Appellant Presentation (Uploaded 02-24-2026)
Meeting
February 24, 2026
Body
Santa Rosa City Council
Original file
1.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Lago Fresco Appeal
Site-specific Public
Safety Risks
Project Address: 4744 Hoen Ave / 2445 Summerfield Rd
Date: February 24, 2026
Presented by: Katy Moranda

Legal Standard:

Density Bonus
and Safety
This Appeal is about safety — NOT opposition to housing Density bonus concessions cannot create a specific
adverse impact on public health or safety.

Impacts must be:
• Site-specific
• Identifiable and factual
• Related to public health or safety
• Capable of mitigation
This appeal identifies impacts that meet this standard.

Traffic
Conflict at a
Congested
Intersection
50-unit residential entry point added at an already
congested signalized intersection
Existing conditions include:
• Heavy turning movements
• Peak hour backups
• School and commuter traffic

SAFETY IMPACT
A new residential driveway creates a concentrated
vehicle conflict zone at the intersection.

Safety
Impacts of
Driveway
Placement
Driveway placement requires split-second conflict
judgments
Drivers exiting must simultaneously:
• Judge limited traffic gaps
• Monitor bike lane activity
• Watch pedestrians
• Merge near signalized intersection

SAFETY IMPACT
Increased likelihood of rear-end collisions and side-impact crashes from left-turn exits.

High Conflict Density Within 800 Feet
1 Signalized intersection 9 Driveways Striped bike lanes (both sides)2 Crosswalks SAFETY IMPACT: Adding a 50-unit entry point intensifies an already high-conflict corridor.

Constrained
Internal
Access
50 Units — One Access Point
• Narrow driveway
• Parking on both sides
• Single ingress/egress

SAFETY IMPACT
All vehicle traffic is concentrated at one
constrained exit.

Internal congestion & limited parking
• 20 Tandem spaces (10 stalls)
• No visitor parking
• No service/delivery parking

SAFETY IMPACT
Internal congestion increases blind
exits and queueing into the
intersection.

High
Pedestrian
Exposure
Project entrance located in high pedestrian activity area Nearby:
• Multiple crosswalks
• Medical and office buildings
• Frequent foot traffic
• Frequent cyclist traffic

SAFETY IMPACT
Increased turning movements raise risk of vehicle-
pedestrian conflict.

Severe injury and fatal pedestrian incidents have occurred in this corridor.

Bike Lane
Safety
Driveway introduces new conflict point in active bike
corridor
• Heavily used bike lanes
• Usage expected to increase with greenway

SAFETY IMPACT
Reduced visibility + turning movements increase vehicle- cyclist collision risk.

Fire and
Emergency
Access
Concerns
Emergency access constrained by single narrow entry
• Narrow access lanes
• Parking on both sides
• Tandem spaces limit maneuverability
• A single access point

SAFETY IMPACT
Potential delays for fire apparatus and life-safety
evacuation bottlenecks.

Cumulative
Safety Impact
This site combines multiple risk factors within one
compact area:
• A busy signalized intersection
• Multiple driveways
• Crosswalk activity
• Bike lane traffic
• A concentrated 50-unit entry and exit point

SAFETY IMPACT
These overlapping risks create a concentrated safety
conflict zone.

Requested
Action
This appeal seeks project modification — not housing
denial.

Request:
• Driveway redesign or widening
• Parking layout revision
• Independent traffic safety review
• Emergency access reevaluation
• Fire evacuation reevaluation
Closing
Statement
This appeal seeks prevention of identifiable safety risks.

We respectfully request reconsideration and modification to protect:
• Residents
• Pedestrians
• Cyclists
• Emergency responders
Thank you for your consideration.

← All documents from this meeting