MEETING INFORMATION
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
6:30 p.m.
Council Chambers | Building 2
10601 Magnolia Ave • Santee, CA 92071
TO WATCH LIVE:
AT&T U-verse channel 99 (SD Market) | Cox channel 117 (SD County) www.cityofsanteeca.gov
IN-PERSON ATTENDANCE
Members of the public who wish to view the Council Meeting live, can watch the live taping of the Council meeting in the Council Chambers on the meeting date and time listed above.
LIVE PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public who wish to comment on matters on the City Council agenda or during Non-Agenda Public Comment may appear in person and submit a speaker slip, before the item is called. Your name will be called when it is time to speak.
PLEASE NOTE: Public Comment will be limited to 3 minutes and speaker slips will only be accepted until the item is called. The timer will begin when the participant begins speaking.
November 13, 2024 | 6:30 p.m.
2 ROLL CALL: Mayor John W. Minto
Vice Mayor Dustin Trotter – District 4
Councilmember Rob McNelis – District 1
Councilmember Ronn Hall – District 2
Councilmember Laura Koval – District 3
LEGISLATIVE INVOCATION: Carlton Oaks Baptist Church – Craig Barnett
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PRESENTATION: Santee City Cup Presentation: Varsity Football Game Between Santana High School and West Hills High School
PRESENTATION: Introduction of 2024 Miss Santee, Miss Teen Santee and Three Santee Princesses
CONSENT CALENDAR:
PLEASE NOTE: Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be approved by one motion, with no separate discussion prior to voting. The public, staff or Councilmembers may request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion or action. Speaker slips for this category must be presented to the City Clerk at the start of the meeting. Speakers are limited to 3 minutes.
(1) Approval of Reading by Title Only and Waiver of Reading in Full, of Ordinances and Resolutions on the Agenda. (City Clerk – Jeffries)
(2) Approval of Meeting Minutes of the Santee City Council for the September 25, October 9, and October 23, 2024, Regular Meetings. (City Clerk – Jeffries) (3) Approval of Payment of Demands as Presented. (Finance – Jennings) (4) Approval of the Expenditure of $83,227.69 for October 2024 Legal Services. (Finance – Jennings)
(5) Adoption of a Resolution Amending the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. (City Clerk – Jeffries)
(6) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute ARPAFunded Agreement Amendments with the East County Transitional Living Center for $100,000.00 and PATH San Diego for Homelessness Prevention Services for $84,475.00. (City Manager – Best)
November 13, 2024 | 6:30 p.m.
3 (7) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of 120 New Dell Precision 3460 Small Form Factor Workstations to Replace Existing Workstations Through the Minnesota NASPO ValuePoint Master Cooperative Purchasing Master Agreement No. 23026 in the Amount of $99,128.40. (City Manager – Best)
(8) Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Procurement of Traffic Signal Cabinets and Controllers for the Traffic Signal Upgrade Project CIP 2023-09 for a total amount of $177,623.94, and Finding the Action is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302(c). (Engineering – Schmitz) (9) Authorization for Transferring the Obligation Authority of the Community Project Funding/Congressional Directed Spending Fund for State Route 52 Improvements to Caltrans and Finding the Action is Not a Project Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). (Engineering – Schmitz) (10) Adoption of a Resolution Rejecting the Bid Submitted by Construction & Industrial Roofing Co., Inc. and Awarding the Construction Contract to AOS Inc. dba Superior Roofing for the City Hall Improvements – Building 6 Roof Replacement (CIP 2024-31) Project for a Total Anticipated Project Cost of $105,366.00 and Determining the Project is Categorically Exempt from Environmental Review Under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(c). (Engineering – Schmitz) (11) Adoption of a Resolution Finding in Support of and Authorizing the Purchase of One New 2025 Ford E450 Chassis with Remount of Existing Ambulance Module onto the New Chassis and Trade-In of a 2017 Ford E450 Chassis, All with Braun Northwest, Inc. per HGACBuy Contract No. AM10-23 for a total purchase price of $211,105.95. (Fire – Matsushita)
(12) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of New Structural Firefighting Clothing (Turnouts) from Allstar Fire Equipment Inc., per Sourcewell Contract No. 010424-LIO for an Amount Not to Exceed $66,251.17. (Fire – Matsushita)
(13) Rejection of Claims Against the City by Cameron Matthews, Andrew Golembiewski, Chad White, Tamara McAnally and John Ehmke, and Acceptance of a Claim Against the City by James Ross for $2,663.26. (Human Resources – Freeman)
(14) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Appropriation of Funds in the amount of $15,000.00 for the FLSA Determination Related to 56-Hour Work Week Battalion Chiefs Based Upon a Non-Exempt Status Determination. (Fire – Matsushita)
November 13, 2024 | 6:30 p.m.
4 NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT (15 minutes):
Persons wishing to address the City Council regarding items not on the posted agenda may do so at this time. In accordance with State law, Council may not take action on an item not scheduled on the Agenda. If appropriate, the item will be referred to the City Manager or placed on a future agenda. This first Non-Agenda Public Comment period is limited to a total of 15 minutes. Additional Non-Agenda Public Comment is received prior to Council Reports.
PUBLIC HEARING:
(15) Continuation of the October 23, 2024, City Council Workshop Regarding the City of Santee Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and Proposed Updates to Development Impact Fees and Continuation of a Public Hearing to Adopt the Nexus Study and the Proposed Development Impact Fee Schedule to January 8, 2025. (Finance – Jennings)
Recommendation:
1. Continue the discussion from the October 23, 2024, workshop regarding the updated City of Santee Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the proposed updates to development impact fees; and
2. Open and continue the duly noticed public hearing to January 8, 2025, to consider public testimony and adopt the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the proposed development impact fees.
(16) Public Hearing and Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Santee Municipal Code, Title 13, “Zoning” Regarding Accessory Structures in the Front Yard (Case File: ZOA-2024-0003). (Planning and Building – Sawa) Recommendation:
1. Open, conduct, and close the Public Hearing on the Ordinance amending Title 13; and
2. Introduce and conduct the First Reading of that Ordinance; and
3. Set and conduct the Second Reading for December 11, 2024. (17) Public Hearing and Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Santee Municipal Code Title 13 (Zoning) Regarding Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units to Comply with Recent Changes in State Law and Finding the Action to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Under Section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code (Case File ZOA-2024-0003). (City Attorney – Hagerty) Recommendation:
1. Open, conduct, and close the Public Hearing on the Ordinance amending Title 13; and
2. Introduce and conduct the First Reading of the Ordinance; and
3. Set and conduct the Second Reading of the Ordinance on December 11, 2024.
November 13, 2024 | 6:30 p.m.
5 (18) Public Hearing and Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Table 13.12.030A and Table 13.14.030A of the Santee Municipal Code Title 13 (Zoning) Regarding Commercial/Office and Industrial Use Regulations Applicable to Car Wash Facilities (Case File ZOA-2024-0003) and Finding the Action to be Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. (City Attorney – Hagerty)
Recommendation:
1. Open, conduct, and close the Public Hearing on the Ordinance Amending Title 13; and
2. Introduce and conduct the First Reading of the Ordinance; and
3. Set and conduct the Second Reading of the Ordinance on December 11, 2024.
CONTINUED BUSINESS:
(19) American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Expenditure Plan Final Update and Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of ARPA Funds to the General Fund to Fund a Portion of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 San Diego Sheriff Contract and Authorizing the City Manager to Make All As-Needed Final ARPA Allocations on December 31, 2024. (Finance – Jennings)
Recommendation:
1. Adopt the final ARPA Expenditure Plan, reflecting any adjustments as directed by City Council. Staff also requests that the City Council authorize the City Manager to adjust funding allocations as needed, consistent with City Council’s stated priorities. This includes any final allocations on December 31, 2024, as needed in order to utilize all ARPA funding.
2. Adopt the Resolution authorizing the transfer of $424,721.00 from the ARPA fund to the General Fund to be applied to the cost of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 San Diego Sheriff contract.
NEW BUSINESS:
(20) Presentation of Proposal for City Holiday Closure December 2024. (City Manager – Best)
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Council consider this proposal. Staff invites the Mayor and Councilmembers to discuss questions and concerns.
November 13, 2024 | 6:30 p.m.
6 (21) Request to Approve a Resolution Authorizing a Professional Services Agreement with Interwest Consulting Group Inc. for Specialized Building Professional Services and Finding this Action is Not a Project Under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378. (Planning and Building – Sawa)
Recommendation:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Service Agreement with Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. with a fiscal year 2024-2025 not-to-exceed amount of $310,800.00, not to exceed an amount increased by the applicable CPI in FY 25-26 and FY 26-27, and to execute any amendment to the agreement necessary to increase that amount in any of the three years, within the existing operating budget, if more than anticipated construction activity creates a demand for additional services. (22) Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Dudek, Inc. for Preparation of an Update to the General Plan Land Use Element. (Planning and Building – Sawa)
Recommendation:
Adopt the Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Dudek, Inc. for consulting services related to the preparation of an update to the General Plan Land Use Element in the amount not to exceed $649,645.00 combined over Fiscal Years 2024-2025 and 2025-2026. (23) Resolution Proclaiming an Emergency, Authorizing the Maintenance of Existing Defensible Space Areas in the San Diego River Corridor and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into Contracts to Maintain Existing Defensible Space Areas; and Finding Such Action is Exempt from Review Under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15269(c). (City Manager – Best)
Recommendation:
Adopt the Resolution:
1. Proclaiming the immediate fire risk emergency; and
2. Approving the maintenance of defensible space areas to reduce fuel in ten existing defensible space areas to safeguard life, health, or property; and
3. Authorizing the City Manager to enter into contracts for the emergency work, and to take other actions as necessary.
November 13, 2024 | 6:30 p.m.
7 NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT (Continued):
All public comment not presented within the first Non-Agenda Public Comment period above will be heard at this time.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
CITY MANAGER REPORTS:
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS:
CLOSED SESSION:
ADJOURNMENT:
November 13, 2024 | 6:30 p.m.
8 Nov 07 SPARC Council Chamber
Nov 11 Community Oriented Policing Committee CANCELLED Council Chamber Nov 13 Council Meeting Council Chamber
Dec 05 SPARC Council Chamber
Dec 09 Community Oriented Policing Committee Council Chamber Dec 11 Council Meeting Council Chamber
The Santee City Council welcomes you and encourages your continued interest and involvement in the City’s decision-making process.
For your convenience, a complete Agenda Packet is
available for public review at City Hall and on the
City’s website at www.CityofSanteeCA.gov.
The City of Santee complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 12132 of the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12132). Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s Office at (619) 258-4100, ext. 114 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible.
BOARDS, COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES
NOVEMBER & DECEMBER MEETINGS
Minutes DRAFT
Santee City Council
Council Chamber – Building 2
10601 Magnolia Avenue
Santee, California
September 25, 2024
This Regular Meeting of the Santee City Council was called to order by Vice Mayor Dustin Trotter at 6:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Vice Mayor Dustin Trotter, and Councilmembers Ronn Hall, Laura Koval, and Rob McNelis – 4. Excused: Mayor John W. Minto– 1.
Officers present: City Manager Marlene Best, City Attorney Shawn Hagerty, and City Clerk James Jeffries
INVOCATION was given by Associate Pastor Phil Icenhower, The Rock Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Mike Aiken
PROCLAMATION: National Manufacturing Week
Vice Mayor Trotter presented the Proclamation to James Sly, President and CEO of San Diego East County Economic Development Council.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(1) Approval of Reading by Title Only and Waiver of Reading in Full, of Ordinances and Resolutions on the Agenda. (City Clerk)
(2) Approval of Payment of Demands as Presented. (Finance – Jennings) (3) Notice of Required Amendments to Conflict of Interest Code. (City Clerk) (4) Rejection of Claim Against the City by Cookson Enterprises, Inc. and Acceptance of Claim Against the City by Finbarr Prendergast and Debra Mone. (Human Resources – Freeman)
(5) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing an Amendment to the Adopted Salary Schedule Reflecting an Adjustment to the Position of Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) and Adopting a Policy on Shift Schedules and Regular Hours of Work for EMTs. (Human Resources/Fire – Freeman/Matsushita) (Reso 103-2024)
(6) Ratification Authorizing the Appropriation of Funds for Emergency Repair of Fire Engine 205 (V157). (Fire – Matsushita) (Reso 104-2024) Santee City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of September 25, 2024 Page 2 of 4 (7) Revision of the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Resolution Authorized for Hazardous Fuels Reduction and Defensible Space Throughout Designated Areas of the San Diego River Corridor. (Fire – Matsushita) (Reso 105-2024)
(8) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Memorandum of Understanding Between the San Diego Regional Fire Foundation and the City of Santee in Collaboration with the Central Zone Fire Agencies for the Central Zone Radio Grant. (Fire – Matsushita) (Reso 106-2024)
ACTION: Councilmember Koval moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember McNelis seconded the motion, which carried by the following vote: Vice Mayor Trotter Aye; and Councilmembers Hall: Aye; Koval: Aye; and McNelis: Aye. Ayes:
4. Noes: 0. Absent: Mayor Minto – 1.
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT (15 minutes):
(A) Brenda Hammond spoke about political phone calls, her City pin collection and the upcoming Closed Session for the evening.
PUBLIC HEARING:
(9) Public Hearing for a Conditional Use Permit CUP-2023-0003 for a Recreational Vehicle and Self-Storage Facility and Related Site Improvements on a 4.85 Acre Vacant Site Located at 8355 Graves Avenue (APN 387-061-11 & -12) in the General Commercial (GC) Zone and Finding the Project Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Pursuant to the Class 32 Infill Exemption (Applicant: Chris Cook, Cameron Construction Co. L.P.). (Planning and Building – Sawa) The Public Hearing was opened at 6:39 p.m. Micheal Coyne, Principal Planner, provided a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Council questions with assistance of the Carl Schmitz, Engineering Director.
Public Speakers:
• Cheryl Smith
• Jim Moxham, Cameron Brothers Company.
Action: Councilmember Koval moved approval of staff recommendation.
Councilmember McNelis seconded the motion, which carried by the following vote: Vice Mayor Trotter Aye; and Councilmembers Hall: Aye; Koval: Aye; and McNelis: Aye. Ayes:
4. Noes: 0. Absent: Mayor Minto – 1.
The Public Hearing was closed at 6:58 p.m.
Santee City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of September 25, 2024 Page 3 of 4 NEW BUSINESS:
(10) Consideration of Development Impact Fees Associated with Accessory Dwelling Units. (City Attorney – Hagerty)
Shawn Hagerty, City Attorney, introduced the Item and Tari Williams, Assistant City Attorney, provided a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Council questions with the assistance of Christina Rios, Senior Planner, and Heather Jennings, Finance Director.
The Council received the report and provided feedback and direction to staff. (11) Resolution Appointing James Jeffries as City Clerk and Approving the Employee Management Services Agreement. (Human Resources – Freeman) (Reso 107-2024)
Rida Freeman, Human Recourses Director provided a staff report.
Action: Vice Mayor Trotter moved approval of staff recommendation.
Councilmember McNelis seconded the motion, which carried by the following vote: Vice Mayor Trotter Aye; and Councilmembers Hall: Aye; Koval: Aye; and McNelis: Aye. Ayes:
4. Noes: 0. Absent: Mayor Minto – 1.
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: (Continued)
None.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
Councilmember Hall spoke about the new MTS Copper Line between El Cajon and Santee.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS:
None.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS:
None.
CLOSED SESSION:
Councilmembers recessed at 7:26 p.m. and convened in Closed Session at 7:28 p.m.
Santee City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of September 25, 2024 Page 4 of 4 (12) Conference with Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation
(Gov. Code section 54956.9(d)(1))
Name of Case: Hope for the Homeless Lakeside, Inc. et al. v. County of San Diego et al., USDC 24-cv-01009-L-MSB
Councilmembers reconvened in Open Session at 7:39 p.m. with all members present Vice Mayor Trotter reported for Item 12, direction was given to staff.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
Date Approved:
James Jeffries, City Clerk
Minutes
Santee City Council
Council Chamber – Building 2
10601 Magnolia Avenue
Santee, California
October 9, 2024
This Regular Meeting of the Santee City Council was called to order by Mayor John W.
Minto at 6:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John W. Minto, Vice Mayor Dustin Trotter, and Councilmembers Ronn Hall, Laura Koval, and Rob McNelis – 5 Officers present: City Manager Marlene Best, City Attorney Shawn Hagerty and City Clerk James Jeffries
INVOCATION was given by Pastor Marshall Masser, Lakeside Christian Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Vice Mayor Trotter
RECOGNITION: VFW Post 9327 of Santee Recognition of Vice Mayor Trotter and Councilmember McNelis
Members of the VFW recognized Vice Mayor Trotter and Councilmember McNelis for their contributions.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(1) Approval of Reading by Title Only and Waiver of Reading in Full, of Ordinances and Resolutions on the Agenda. (City Clerk – Jeffries) (2) Approval of Payment of Demands as Presented. (Finance – Jennings) (3) Approval of the Expenditure of $110,830.88 for August 2024 Legal Services. (Finance – Jennings)
(4) Adoption of a Resolution Accepting the West Hills Park ADA Parking Improvements (CIP 2024-37) Project as Complete and Finding the Action is Not a Project Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). (Engineering – Schmitz) (Reso 108-2024)
(5) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Award of a Contract for Homeless Encampment Cleanup Services to Alpha Project for the Homeless. (Community Services – Chavez) (Reso 109-2024) DRAFT
Santee City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of October 9, 2024 Page 2 of 4 (6) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing an Application for a Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Grant from the County of San Diego for the Shadow Hill Park Playground Renovation Project. (Community Services – Chavez) (Reso 110-2024)
ACTION: Councilmember Koval moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember McNelis seconded the motion, which carried by the following vote: Mayor Minto: Aye; Vice Mayor Trotter: Aye; and Councilmembers Hall: Aye; Koval: Aye; and McNelis: Aye. Ayes: 5. Noes: 0.
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT (15 minutes):
None.
PUBLIC HEARING:
(7) Public Hearing for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP-2024-0004) for a Wireless Telecommunications Facility Located within a 1,900-SquareFoot Lease Area at Santee Lakes Addressed as 10400-CS Fanita Parkway (APN 378-020-49-00) in the Public (PUB) General Plan Land Use Designation and Park/Open Space (P/OS) Zone and Finding the Project Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303. (Applicant: Atlas Tower 1, LLC). (Planning and Building – Sawa) (Reso 111-2024)
The Public Hearing was opened at 6:48 p.m. Rachael Lindebrekke, Associate Planner, provided a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Council questions with the assistance of Cory Kading, Santee Lakes Director of Park and Recreation.
Public Speaker:
• Tom Walters
Action: Councilmember Koval moved approval of staff recommendation.
Councilmember Hall seconded the motion, which carried by the following vote: Mayor Minto: Aye; Vice Mayor Trotter: Aye; and Councilmembers Hall: Aye; Koval: Aye; and McNelis: Aye. Ayes: 5. Noes: 0.
The Public Hearing was closed at 6:59 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS:
(8) Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Santee Municipal Code Title 1 (General Provisions) to Address Regulation of Unpermitted Privately Sponsored Community Events. (City Attorney – Hagerty)
Santee City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of October 9, 2024 Page 3 of 4
Shawn Hagerty, City Attorney, introduced the Item and Tari Williams, Assistant City Attorney provided a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Council questions.
Public Speakers:
• Dan Bickford
Action: Councilmember Hall moved approval of staff recommendation.
Councilmember McNelis seconded the motion, which carried by the following vote: Mayor Minto: Aye; Vice Mayor Trotter: Aye; and Councilmembers Hall: Aye; Koval: Aye; and McNelis: Aye. Ayes: 5. Noes: 0.
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: (Continued)
None.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
Councilmember Koval shared her experience attending the second annual Lōkahi Festival hosted by Guardian Angels Catholic Church.
Vice Mayor Trotter reminded the community about the upcoming Liberty and Libations event at the Santee VFW.
Mayor Minto discussed his recent vacation and the upcoming League of California Cities Annual Conference.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS:
The City Manager reminded the community about upcoming City events.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS:
None.
CLOSED SESSION:
Councilmembers recessed at 7:15 p.m. and convened in Closed Session at 7:20 p.m. except for Councilmember McNelis who recused himself from Item 9 due to conflict of interest and left the meeting.
(9) Conference with Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation
(Gov. Code section 54956.9(d)(1))
Name of Case: Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee, SDSC Case No. 37- 2022-00041478-CU-MC-CTL
Santee City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of October 9, 2024 Page 4 of 4 Councilmembers reconvened in Open Session at 7:33 p.m. with all members present, except Councilmember McNelis. Mayor Minto reported for Item 9 information was received and direction was given to staff.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:34 p.m.
Date Approved:
James Jeffries, City Clerk
Minutes
Santee City Council
Council Chamber – Building 2
10601 Magnolia Avenue
Santee, California
October 23, 2024
This Regular Meeting of the Santee City Council was called to order by Mayor John W.
Minto at 6:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John W. Minto, Vice Mayor Dustin Trotter, and Councilmembers Laura Koval, and Rob McNelis – 4 Excused:
Councilmember Hall – 1.
Officers present: City Manager Marlene Best, City Attorney Shawn Hagerty and City Clerk James Jeffries
INVOCATION was given by Pastor James Class, Calvary Chapel of Santee PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Sam Rensberry, Public Services Manager CONSENT CALENDAR:
(1) Approval of Reading by Title Only and Waiver of Reading in Full of Ordinances and Resolutions on the Agenda. (City Clerk – Jeffries) (2) Approval of Meeting Minutes of the Santee City Council for the August 14, August 28, and September 11, 2024, Regular Meetings. (City Clerk – Jeffries)
(3) Approval of Payment of Demands as Presented. (Finance – Jennings) (4) Approval of the Expenditure of $86,820.31 for September 2024 Legal Services. (Finance – Jennings)
(5) Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Santee Municipal Code Title 1 “General Provisions” to Address Regulation of Unpermitted Privately Sponsored Community Events. (City Clerk – Jeffries) (Ord 617-2024)
(6) Adoption of a Resolution Approving an Amended Salary Schedule to Reflect the Addition of a Limited Term, Limited Benefited Project Manager and Authorizing the Appropriation of $52,420.00 to the Fiscal Year 2024- 25 Adopted Fire Operating Budget. (Fire/Human Resources – Matsushita/Freeman) (Reso 112-2024)
(7) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Appropriation and Expenditure of Paramedic Equipment Funds for the Purchase of One (1) Atlas ALS Pediatric Simulation Manikin From iSimulate USA. (Fire – Matsushita) (Reso 113-2024)
DRAFT
Santee City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of October 23, 2024 Page 2 of 3 (8) Adoption of a Resolution Accepting the Town Center Community Park – Artificial Turf Replacement (CIP 2024-43) Project as Complete. (Community Services – Chavez) (Reso 114-2024)
(9) Adoption of a Resolution Accepting the Award of Regional Early Action Program Housing Acceleration Program Cycle 2 (HAP 2.0) Grant Funds from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Grant Agreement. (Planning and Building – Sawa) (Reso 115-2024)
ACTION: Vice Mayor Trotter moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Koval seconded the motion, which carried by the following vote: Mayor Minto: Aye; Vice Mayor Trotter: Aye; and Councilmembers Koval: Aye; and McNelis: Aye.
Ayes: 4. Noes: 0. Absent: Councilmember Hall – 1.
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT (15 minutes):
None.
NEW BUSINESS:
(10) City Council Workshop to Review and Discuss the City of Santee Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and Proposed Development Impact Fees. (Finance – Jennings)
Erin Bullers, Finance Manager, introduced the Item and Megan Quinn, Harris & Associates, provided a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Council questions with assistance of Shawn Hagerty, City Attorney; Heather Jennings, Finance Director; Sandi Sawa, Planning and Building Director; Carl Schmitz, Engineering Director; and Justin Matsushita, Fire Chief.
The Council received the report and provided feedback and direction to staff.
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: (Continued)
None.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
Councilmember Koval reported attending the League of California Cities Annual Conference alongside other Councilmembers and City staff, attending Santee Brews and Bites Festival Fundraiser event, and participating in mock interviews with students from Bostonia Global High School through Workforce Connect; she also highlighted ongoing efforts by local law enforcement to address homelessness cleanup efforts, and trespassing issues in the community.
Santee City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of October 23, 2024 Page 3 of 3 Vice Mayor Trotter expressed gratitude to City staff for their work on the road pavement projects and for the completion of the synthetic turf replacement at Town Center Community Park; he also acknowledged the efforts of the Firefighters and Sheriff Department staff in maintaining the City's safety.
Mayor Minto also acknowledged City staff for their work on the road pavement projects; he provided report on attending the League of California Cities Annual Conference; and he highlighted an upcoming meeting with League of California Cities Leaders.
Councilmember McNelis inquired about the work paving work being performed by Padre Dam Municipal Water District for the Advanced Water Purification Project.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS:
The City Manager thanked all City staff for their hard work and reminded the community about the upcoming events.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS:
The City Attorney addressed the Council's concerns and reminded the community about the upcoming meeting for commercial property owners on trespassing issues.
CLOSED SESSION:
Councilmembers recessed at 8:24 p.m. and convened in Closed Session at 8:29 p.m. except for Councilmember McNelis who recused himself from Item 11 due to conflict of interest and left the meeting
(11) Conference with Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation
(Gov. Code section 54956.9(d)(1))
Name of Case: Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee, SDSC Case No. 37- 2022-00041478-CU-MC-CTL
Councilmembers reconvened in Open Session at 8:42 p.m. with all members present, except Councilmembers Hall and McNelis. Mayor Minto reported for Item 11, direction was given to staff.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:42 p.m.
Date Approved:
James Jeffries, City Clerk
vchlist
10/17/2024 2:54:56PM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
61881
Date Vendor
10/8/2024 10482 TRI STAR RISK MANAGEMENT
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by:_--_..\=\�A"--'M�Ci=="'l!kz'-"-"._'------
Approved
Date,
by:--
=
--
JO
--
I $
-��---+--+--- '21-t-:-_....--::
Date: ____ /cJ)R/vJ
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
121151
------ PO# Description/Account
WORKERS COMP LOSSES; SEP24
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers :
Amount
41,415.56
41,415.56
41,415.56
41,415.56
vchlist Voucher List
10/16/2024 1:19:01PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137462 10/16/2024 15087 34TH STREET INC 2024-144 TRAINING 4,875.00 Total: 4,875.00
137463 10/16/2024 10010 AIS TRUST ACCOUNT NEWPORT 09302024 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE 3RD 887.00 Total: 887.00
137464 10/16/2024 10262 AUSTIN, ROY 10082024 RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 1,720.85 Total: 1,720.85
137465 .10/16/2024 15369 BICKMORE ACTUARIAL 30992 55031 ACTUARIAL SERVICES 7,200.00 Total: 7,200.00
137466 10/16/2024 15009 BLUESHIELD OF CA PROMISE HEALT ACID 12333 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 726.12 ACID 12400 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 726.12
ACID 12598 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 726.12
ACID 12628 REFUND -AMBULANCE BILLING 579.40
Total: 2,757.76
137467 10/16/2024 13292 BORDER RECAPPING LLC 24-0211780-008 54818 VEHICLE SUPPLIES 1,075.10 Total: 1,075.10
137468 10/16/2024 15384 BOUCHARD, CANDICE ACID 14582 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 200.00 Total: 200.00
137469 10/16/2024 15385 BRAUN, PIERRE ACID 12854 REFUND -AMBULANCE BILLING 243.14 Total: 243.14
137470 10/16/2024 15386 BRENNER, DAROLYN ACID 5271 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 25.00 Total: 25.00
137471 10/16/2024 13568 CALIFORNIA DEBT & INVESTMENT 32885 CDIAC REPORTING - POSTAGE MA 23,438.40 Total: 23,438.40
137472 10/16/2024 10569 CHARLENE'S DANCE N CHEER 2487 RECREATION DANCE CLASSES 7,158.00 Total: 7,158.00
137473 10/16/2024 10032 CINTAS CORPORATION 694 4206202035 54844 MISC SHOP RENTALS 88.54
vchlist Voucher List
10/16/2024 1:19:01PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubQen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
137473 10/16/2024 10032 10032 CINTAS CORPORATION 694 (Continued) 137474 10/16/2024 10333 COX COMMUNICATIONS 038997401; OCT24 094486701; OCT24
137475 10/16/2024 10651 CUSTEAU, JASON 523Z
137476 10/16/2024 10046 D MAX ENGINEERING INC 8750
137477 10/16/2024 11418 DAMOOR, KESHAV 09192024KD
137478 10/16/2024 10795 DO, AARON 030680
137479 10/16/2024 13275 DOCHTERMAN, LINDA 09192024LD
137480 10/16/2024 13858 EL LATINO NEWSPAPER 89554
137481 10/16/2024 10058 ETS PRODUCTIONS INC 21289-ETS
21290-ETS
137482 10/16/2024 15399 GIN, WILLIAM 10042024
137483 10/16/2024 13274 GRANBOIS, DARCY 091920240G
137484 10/16/2024 13211 JEFFRIES, JAMES 10072024JJ
137485 10/16/2024 10272 JENKINS, CARROLL 1008024
PO# Description/Account
Total:
9951 RIVERWALK DR
CITY HALL GROUP BILL
Total:
EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
54849 STORMWATER PROGRAM ASSIST/l
Total:
COMMISSION STIPEND
Total:
EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
COMMISSION STIPEND
Total:
NOTICE OF ELECTION
Total:
54819 AUDIO VISUAL
54819 AUDIO VISUAL
Total:
EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
COMMISSION STIPEND
Total:
CONFERENCE PER DIEM
Total:
RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE
Amount
88.54 57.00
3,404.59
3,461.59
250.00
250.00
25,615.36
25,615.36
50.00 50.00
250.00
250.00
50.00 50.00
840.00
840.00
8,754.00
8,754.00
17,508.00
250.00
250.00
50.00 50.00
238.00
238.00
3,625.88
vchlist Voucher List
10/16/2024 1:19:01PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ub�en
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
137485 10/16/2024 10272 10272 JENKINS, CARROLL (Continued) 137486 10/16/2024 14229 JOBSITE SUPPLY CO 83378600 54858 137487 10/16/2024 13247 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 100824
137488 10/16/2024 15387 KLEIN, DAVID ACID 9870
137489 10/16/2024 15398 LEASK, RYAN 09302024
137490 10/16/2024 10204 LIFE ASSIST INC 1511963 54807
1512963 54807
1513147 54807
137491 10/16/2024 14742 LOWNDES, BECKY 10824
137492 10/16/2024 10507 GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SVCS 37535814 137493 10/16/2024 13245 NEXTECH SYSTEMS, INC INV2896 54973 137494 10/16/2024 15388 OLSEN, ED ACID 10785
137495 10/16/2024 10344 PADRE DAM MUNICIPAL WATER DIST 29700015; AUG24 29700015; SEP24
137496 10/16/2024 10092 PHOENIX GROUP INFO SYSTEMS 082024031 54878 Description/Account
Total:
CIP SUPPLIES
Total:
RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE
Total:
REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING
Total:
EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
EMS SUPPLIES
EMS SUPPLIES
EMS SUPPLIES
Total:
CASH ADVANCE BREWS & BITES
Total:
MITEL MXE Ill CONTROLLER SATA !
Total:
NEXTECH RRFB SYSTEM
Total:
REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING
Total:
CONSTRUCTION METER
CONSTRUCTION METER
Total:
FY 24/25 PARKING CITE PROCESS
Total:
Amount
3,625.88
68.14 68.14
1,048.20
1,048.20
50.00 50.00
222.50
222.50
1,887.99
3,803.44
1,752.60
7,444.03
500.00
500.00
1,588.52
1,588.52
9,896.36
9,896.36
250.00
250.00
270.12
251.50
521.62
1,072.69
1,072.69
vchlist Voucher List
10/16/2024 1:19:01PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
137497 10/16/2024 15343 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 2128-1 137498 10/16/2024 10097 ROMAINE ELECTRIC CORPORATION 12-062920 54958 137499 10/16/2024 10407 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 04229703218;SEP24 22373580042;SEP24
137500 10/16/2024 10768 SANTEE SCHOOL DISTRICT 9591 54923 137501 10/16/2024 13171 SC COMMERCIAL, LLC 2731444-IN 55006 137502 10/16/2024 14797 SEDANO FORD OF LM INC 20497421 54895 20497701 54895
137503 10/16/2024 10837 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SIGNAL 83690 54955 83691 54955
83692 54955
83693 54955
83694 54955
83695 54955
137504 10/16/2024 10217 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 6012234147 54870 6012234148 54897
137505 10/16/2024 15031 TALLAL INC 092324-S
137506 10/16/2024 10250 THE EAST COUNTY 00146091
Description/Account
QUADIENT POSTAGE FUNDING
Total:
VEHICLE SUPPLIES
Total:
STREET LIGHTS
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Total:
FIELD LIGHTS
Total:
DELIVERED BULK FUEL
Total:
VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS
VEHICLE REPAIR PART
Total:
DIG ALERTS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - MISC. WORK
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SERVICE CALLE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SERVICE CALLE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - EXTRA WORK Z
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - TCP STREETLIG
Total:
OFFICE SUPPLIES - P&B, E
OFFICE SUPPLIES
Total:
MOVIE IN THE PARK SCREEN
Total:
NOTICE OF ELECTION PUBLICATIC
Total:
Amount
43.35 43.35
1,317.14
1,317.14
45,768.21
8,116.81
53,885.02
65.10 65.10
2,051.89
2,051.89
216.32
50.13 266.45
770.70
1,691.70
659.84
164.96
1,891.89
3,686.20
8,865.29
164.67
70.29 234.96
545.00
545.00
143.50
143.50
'
vchlist
10/16/2024 1:19:01PM
Bank code : ubQen
Voucher
137507
137508
137509
137510
137511
137512
137513
137514
Date ----------------- Vendor
10/16/2024 10467 THE EPOCH TIMES IN SAN DIEGO
10/16/2024 10829 TIENG VIET SAN DIEGO NEWS
10/16/2024 1·5091 T-MOBILE USA INC
10/16/2024 15022 UNITED HEALTHCARE
10/16/2024 15389 URIBE, JAMES
10/16/2024 10338 VANDIVER, EDDIE
10/16/2024 14687 WEX BANK
10/16/2024 14868 YOGATREX
53 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
53 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by:___ =-l-"-�--=-='""'�-�------ Date: ______ ___,,_1-+---++,.-,-< Approved by: ___________ _,_ _ __,___
Date: _________ _
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
SD056202409
1624-9
993045165; SEP24
ACID 10655
ACID 15495
09192024EV
100237621
0025
PO# Description/Account
NOTICE OF ELECTION PUBLICATIC
Total:
NOTICE OF ELECTION PUBLICATIC
Total:
CITY HALL
Total:
REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING
Total:
REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING
Total:
COMMISSION STIPEND
Total:
FLEET CARD FUELING
Total:
WELLNESS EVENT
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers
Amount
220.00
220.00
100.00
100.00
1,125.83
1,125.83
716.03
716.03
1,088.94
1,088.94
50.00 50.00
18,357.60
18,357.60
150.00
150.00
213,745.78
213,745.78
vchlist
10/17/2024 3:06:SOPM
Bank code : ubi:ien
Voucher
62180
62192
626192
Date -------------�--- Vendor
10/16/2024 10955 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
10/16/2024 10956 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
10/16/2024 10956 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
3 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
3 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by: ... �th.
Dare �2-ct Appmved�z'S� Date: t,O Z,: -
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
October 24 Retiree
PPE 10/9/24
PPE 10/9/24
October 24 Retiree
PO# Description/Account
FED WITHHOLDING TAX
FED WITHHOLDING & MEDICARE
Total:
CA STATE TAX WITHHELD
Total:
CA STATE TAX WITHHELD
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers
Amount
211.00
109,983.70
110,194.70
36,793.23
36,793.23
46.00 46.00
147,033.93
147,033.93
vchlist
10/17/2024 11:40:07AM
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
137515
137516
137517
137518
137519
137520
137521
137522
137523
137524
137525
Date Vendor Invoice
10/17/2024 12722 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE 166492156
10/17/2024 14452 MEDICAL AIR SERVICES ASSC 1951175
10/17/2024 14458 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 82935940
10/17/2024 10784 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE October 2024 10/17/2024 10335 SAN DIEGO FIREFIGHTERS FEDERAL October 2024 10/17/2024 10424 SANTEE FIREFIGHTERS PPE 10/9/24
10/17/2024 10776 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PPE 10/09/24
10/17/2024 10776 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PPE 10/9/24
10/17/2024 14467 TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY SMOFOU20240915001 10/17/2024 10001 US BANK PPE 10/9/24
10/17/2024 14600 WASHINGTON STATE SUPPORT PPE 10/9/24
11 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
11 Vouchers in this report
PO# Description/Account
EYEMED - VOLUNTARY VISION
Total:
MEDICAL AIR TRANSPORT SVCS
Total:
VOLUNTARY LEGAL
Total:
VOLUNTARY AD&D
Total:
LONG TERM DISABILITY-SFFA
Total:
DUES/PEG/BENEVOLENT/BC EXP
Total:
WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:
WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:
VOLUNTARY INS RIDERS
Total:
PARS RETIREMENT
Total:
WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers:
Amount
1,155.62
1,155.62
179.00
179.00
336.00
336.00
35.05 35.05
1,386.50
1,386.50
4,813.91
4,813.91
449.53
449.53
260.30
260.30
499.35
499.35
1,616.64
1,616.64
751.84
751.84
11,483.74
11,483.74
vchlist
10/17/2024 11 :40:07AM
Bank code : ubQen
Voucher Date Vendor
Preparad bye l'-..)IJJfJ.ih.__..,
Dffie � Appro,ed
Date:
b� -! ,... =
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice ------ PO# Description/Account Amount
PyBatch
10/15/2024 2:58:56PM
EARNINGS SECTION
Type Hours/units
Grand
Totals
16,154.56
Rate Amount Src
768,246.24
Plan
roth
sb-1
sb-3
sffa
sffapc
st1cs3
st2cs3
texlif
vaccpr
vaccpt
vcanpr
vcanpt
vgcipt
vghipr
vision
voladd
voldis
vollif
vollpb
Payroll Processing Report
CITY OF SANTEE
9/26/2024 to 10/9/2024-2 Cycle b
DEDUCTIONS SECTION
Base Wages
70,607.20
Deduction Benefit/Cont LvPlan
91,738.98
15,855.73
13,129.16
8,496.34
98.58 71.99
3,636.70
1,035.32
2,752.17
475.67
249.64
574.45
204.75
318.41
90.25 88.70
15.56 557.87
17.50 218.13
155.27
277,092.02
-2,752.17
-475.67
-155.27
93,720.37
LEAVE SECTION
Accrued
Gross:
Net:
Taken Banked Lost
768,246.24
491,154.22
<< No Errors / 15 Warnings >>
vchlist
10/31/2024 11:10:02AM
Bank code : ubQen
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher Amount
43816
Date ---------------- Vendor - Invoice PO # Description/Account ----------------- __ __,_ __________ ------ 10/18/202412774 LIABILITYCLAIMSACCOUNT
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by: :LAf �
Approved
Date:
by: ioe,12�, I Date: (d 13! z,ef
101824 LIABILITY CLAIMS
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers :
2,849.00
2,849.00
2,849.00
2,849.00
vchlist
10/23/2024 12:46:09PM
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
9244
6869860
6937424
Date ------------------
Vendor Invoice ----------
10/18/2024 10353 PERS
10/18/2024 14704 457 MISSIONSQUARE
10/18/2024 14705 RHS MISSIONSQUARE
3 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
3 Vouchers in this report
Preparedby \.3UJ{,�
Date: (��
Appcoved by�=;}L-\
Date: � :::::.___ _
09 24 4
PPE 10/9/24
PPE 10/9/24
PO# Description/Account
RETIREMENT PAYMENT
Total:
ICMA-457
Total:
RETIREE HSA
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers
Amount
156,735.75
156,735.75
43,054.88
43,054.88
5,096.93
5,096.93
204,887.56
204,887.56
vchlist Voucher List
10/24/2024 1:34:SOPM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubQen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
137526 10/24/2024 10003 A & B SAW & LAWNMOWER SHOP 0739 137527 10/24/2024 13321 ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE 0009683-IN 137528 10/24/2024 10510 AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC 1877742933 137529 10/24/2024 11445 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1072898YJ
137530 10/24/2024 15405 ANDREW ELECTRIC 6580
137531 10/24/2024 10412 AT&T 000022333234
137532 10/24/2024 14306 AZTEC LANDSCAPING INC J1868
J1882
137533 10/24/2024 14781 BENAVIDES, MANUEL 872855
137534 10/24/2024 13292 BORDER RECAPPING LLC 24-0213234-008 24-0213635-008
137535 10/24/2024 10876 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC 4040876762 137536 10/24/2024 11402 CARROLL, JUDI 11012024-96
137537 10/24/2024 10031 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC AA8W22F
PO# Description/Account
54823 EQUIPMENT MAINT SUPPLIES
Total:
54412 ENCAMPMENT CLEAN UPS
Total:
CLOUD STORAGE SERVICES
Total:
FD PAGER SERVICE
Total:
PERMIT# B-ELEC-24-0129 REFUND
Total:
TELEPHONE
Total:
54798 CUSTODIAL SERVICES - AUGUST F
54798 CUSTODIAL SERVICES - PARKS
Total:
WORK BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
54818 VEHICLE REPAIR
54818 TIRES
Total:
54839 PLOTTER MAINTENANCE & USAGE
Total:
MEADOWBROOK HARDSHIP PRO<:
Total:
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
Amount
185.49
185.49
5,369.76
5,369.76
100.00
100.00
219.10
219.10
421.38
421.38
906.89
906.89
4,972.43
4,972.43
9,944.86
141.90
141.90
35.70 303.89
339.59
213.61
213.61
135.11
135.11
646.19
vchlist Voucher List
10/24/2024 1:34:SOPM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137537 10/24/2024 10031 10031 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC (Continued) Total: 646.19 137538 10/24/2024 14527 CHAVEZ, NICOLAS 10162024NC PER DIEM - UPDATED 64.50 Total: 64.50
137539 10/24/2024 12349 CHOICE LOCKSMITHING 090624WHP 54843 LOCKSMITH SERVICES - AS NEEDE 416.88 091124COS 54843 LOCKSMITH SERVICES 274.76
Total: 691.64
137540 10/24/2024 10032 CINTAS CORPORATION 694 4206934347 54844 MISC SHOP RENTALS 92.95 Total: 92.95
137541 10/24/2024 11409 CLAYTON, SYLVIA 11012024-340 MEADOWBROOK HARDSHIP PRO( 141.39 Total: 141.39
137542 10/24/2024 15406 COOK, PATRICK 5284 DEVELOPER DEPOSIT REFUND 1,500.00 Total: 1,500.00
137543 10/24/2024 10161 CORE SERVICES INC 91146 54916 CUSTODIAL SERVICES - OFFICES 5,043.39 Total: 5,043.39
137544 10/24/2024 10171 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AUDITOR & 07/2024 AGENCY REV 07/2024 AGENCY PARK CITE REPT 302.50 07/2024 OMV REVENUE 07/2024 OMV PARK CITE REPT 867.50
07/2024 PHOENIX REV 07/2024 PHOENIX CITE REV REPT 537.50 08/2024 AGENCY REV 08/2024 AGENCY PARK CITE REPT 269.75 08/2024 OMV REVENUE 08/2024 OMV PARK CITE REPT 493.75
08/2024 PHOENIX REV 08/2024 PHOENIX CITE REV REPT 1,564.00 09/2024 OMV REVENUE 09/2024 OMV PARK CITE REPT 431.25
09/2024 PHOENIX REV 09/2024 PHOENIX CITE REV REPT 842.75 Total: 5,309.00
137545 10/24/2024 10358 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 25CTOFSAN03 54987 SHERIFF RADIOS 2,714.00 Total: 2,714.00
137546 10/24/2024 10040 COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS 69381 54847 PLUMBING REPAIRS 445.60 69571 54847 PLUMBING REPAIRS & RELATED M 1,041.20
69768 54847 PLUMBING REPAIRS & RELATED M 1,041.20
69941 54847 PLUMBING REPAIRS & RELATED M 1,821.29
vchlist Voucher List
10/24/2024 1:34:50PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubQen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
137546 10/24/2024 10040 COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS (Continued) 70080 54847
137547 10/24/2024 10333 COX COMMUNICATIONS 052335901; OCT24 137548 10/24/2024 12655 DELL MARKETING LP 10771489516 54627 137549 10/24/2024 14811 DIGITECH COMPUTER LLC 60006115 54998 137550 10/24/2024 15394 DURAN, EDMOND ACID 9105
137551 10/24/2024 14926 EAGLES POINT SECURITY INC 22298 54799 22506 54799
22577 54799
137552 10/24/2024 12593 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY, LLC 2024-10-07 54917 137553 10/24/2024 10988 ESPINOLA, TOBY 10142024
137554 10/24/2024 13044 FIELDTURF USA, INC 718983 54735 720440 54735
720441 54735
137555 10/24/2024 10065 GLOBAL POWER GROUP INC 98287 54920 98288 54920
137556 10/24/2024 10066 GLOBALSTAR USA LLC 77296359
Description/Account
PLUMBING REPAIRS & RELATED M
Total:
8950 COTIONWOOD AVE
Total:
MONTHLY WEBSITE HOSTING FEE
Total:
SLEMSA BILLING CONTRACT SER\
Total:
REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING
Total:
SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY
SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY
SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY
Total:
LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICE
Total:
EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR - 40%
AMENDMENT #1 EXTRA WORK PR
ALTERNATE 2 - COOLPLAY INFILL
Total:
GENERATOR MAINT & REPAIRS - 91
GENERATOR MAINT & REPAIRS
Total:
SATELLITE PHONE SERVICE
Amount
18,957.00
23,306.29
196.68
196.68
469.13
469.13
22,457.43
22,457.43
25.00 25.00
2,501.94
2,680.65
2,144.52
7,327.11
1,500.00
1,500.00
200.00
200.00
390,580.82
43,129.12
97,645.21
531,355.15
114.80
114.80
229.60
105.42
vchlist Voucher List
10/24/2024 1:34:50PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137556 10/24/2024 10066 10066 GLOBALSTAR USA LLC (Continued) Total: 105.42 137557 10/24/2024 11196 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES 9229674662 54803 STATION SUPPLIES 535.54 Total: 535.54
137558 10/24/2024 15395 HIRSCH, GLYNNIS ACID 357 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 50.00 ACID 81 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 75.00
Total: 125.00
137559 10/24/2024 12386 HORIZONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1-CIP2024-36 55001 PROGRESS PAYMENT #1-TEMP FIF 120,388.41 1-CI P2024-36-RET RETENTION-PROGRESS PAYMENT -6,019.42
Total: 114,368.99
137560 10/24/2024 11724 ICF JONES & STOKES INC 00000113438 53609 MSCP SUBAREA PLAN 1,240.00 Total: 1,240.00
137561 10/24/2024 15316 JD ANIMAL REMOVAL INC 1756 54805 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL SERVICE 1,440.00 1772 54805 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL SERVICE 1,440.00
Total: 2,880.00
137562 10/24/2024 14956 JET ADVERTISING LLC 12137 54953 WEBSITE CONSULTING SERVICES 75.00 Total: 75.00
137563 10/24/2024 13223 KOVAL, LAURA 09272024 CANDIDATE STATEMENT REFUND 800.00 Total: 800.00
137564 10/24/2024 10203 LAKESIDE EQUIPMENT SALES & 247334 55026 BREWS AND BITES EQUIPMENT RE 5,311.00 Total: 5,311.00
137565 10/24/2024 14596 LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC 64099 54753 GEOTECHNICAL STUDY 634.92 Total: 634.92
137566 10/24/2024 10204 LIFE ASSIST INC 1512166 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 105.21 1512433 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 592.23
1513291 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 289.96
1513746 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 260.22
1514473 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 578.42
1514832 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 4,272.45
vchlist Voucher List
10/24/2024 1:34:SOPM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137566 10/24/2024 10204 LIFE ASSIST INC (Continued)
1514838 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 2,328.59
1515518 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 20.36
Total: 8,447.44
137567 10/24/2024 13155 LIFETIME DOG TRAINING, LLC 5011 RECREATIONAL CLASS 2,616.00 Total: 2,616.00
137568 10/24/2024 15404 LLOYD, MATIHEW ACID 12174 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 2,479.96 Total: 2,479.96
137569 10/24/2024 14759 MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. 32112069 55002 45 GAL TRASH LINERS 14,916.92 Total: 14,916.92
137570 10/24/2024 10155 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING LLC 430169 MUSCO LIGHTING - CONTROL LINf< 950.00 Total: 950.00
137571 10/24/2024 10344 PADRE DAM MUNICIPAL WATER DIST 90000366; SEP24 GROUP BILL 64,144.54 90000367; OCT24 GROUP BILL 64,179.23
Total: 128,323.77
137572 10/24/2024 11442 PATIERSON, EDWARD 11012024-225 MEADOWBROOK HARDSHIP PRO<: 130.36 Total: 130.36
137573 10/24/2024 10157 PRIMO DJ'S 15328929 55022 EVENT CONTRACT 550.00 Total: 550.00
137574 10/24/2024 10150 PROBUILD 04-0380704 54934 BUILDING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 317.32 04-0382117 54934 BUILDING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 150.37
Total: 467.69
137575 10/24/2024 15402 RIOS, CHRISTINA 092924(8) APA CA 2024 CONFERENCE REIMB 508.88 Total: 508.88
137576 10/24/2024 15344 ROBOTIC LAWNMOWER EXPERTS LLC 240912-01 55005 AUTONOMOUS MOWER - WESTON 5,344.38 Total: 5,344.38
137577 10/24/2024 15314 RSG INC 12382 54868 2025-29 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 9,395.00 _,,.
vchlist
10/24/2024 1 :34:SOPM
Bank code : ubQen
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher
137577
Date ----------------- Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount ----------------- __ ____;, __________ ------ 10/24/2024 15314 15314 RSG INC
137578 10/24/2024 10606 SD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT
137579 10/24/2024 13061 SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY &
137580 10/24/2024 15335 SAWA, SANDI
137581 10/24/2024 14797 SEDANO FORD OF LM INC
137582 10/24/2024 15273 SHAFFER, MARK
137583 10/24/2024 10837 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SIGNAL
137584 10/24/2024 14240 SPICER CONSULTING GROUP
137585 10/24/2024 11403 ST JOHN, LYNNE
137586 10/24/2024 10217 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
(Continued)
SHERIFF AUG 2024
OCT-24
092924(A)
20497826
20497991
20498020
20498110
2 83746
83747
83748
83749
83750
83751
83752
1715
11012024-78
6007704751
6012924990
54959
54895
54895
54895
54895
54948
54948
54948
54948
54955
54955
54955
54687
54870
54869
Total: 9,395.00
LAW ENFORCEMENT AUGUST 202, 1,476,515.93
Total: 1,476,515.93
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
Total:
APA CA 2024 CONFERENCE REIMB
VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS
VEHICLE REPAIR PART
VEHICLE REPAIR PART
VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS
WELLNESS EVENT
Total:
Total:
Total:
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SERVICE CALL�
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - MARKOUTS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PM INSPECTIOI\
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - MISC. TASKS
DIG ALERTS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SERVICE CALL�
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - EXTRA WORK -
Total:
ASSMNT ENG & CFO SVCS FY 23-2
Total:
MEADOWBROOK HARDSHIP PRO(
Total:
OFFICE SUPPLIES - P&B, E
FY 24/25 OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINAr
38,674.00
38,674.00
148.34
148.34
15.80 12.49
50.13 119.02
197.44
100.00
100.00
7,365.63
450.00
3,255.00
82.50 889.27
103.10
1,547.78
13,693.28
2,763.56
2,763.56
135.37
135.37
155.19
204.78
vchlist
10/24/2024 1 :34:SOPM
Bank code : ubqen
Date Vendor
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher Invoice
137586
-----------------
137587
137588
137589
137590
137591
137592
137593
137594
137595
10/24/2024 10217 10217 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
10/24/2024 12477 STREAMLINE AUTOMATION
10/24/2024 11587 STRYKER SALES CORPORATION
10/24/2024 15400 TEMPLEMAN, DYLAN
10/24/2024 10250 THE EAST COUNTY
10/24/2024 10257 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
10/24/2024 10133 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
10/24/2024 11305 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS
10/24/2024 12030 WHITE, PAM
10/24/2024 12510 ZERO WASTE USA
70 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
70 Vouchers in this report
(Continued)
2024-98
9207255860
9207267355
9207344551
08082024
00146327
045-486758
24-251139
920240697
XA290205964:01
10142024PW
729644
PO#
55029
54979
54979
54979
54871
54871
54903
Description/Account
Total:
ANNUAL SOFTWARE RENEWAL
Total:
EMS EQUIPMENT
EMS EQUIPMENT
EMS EQUIPMENT
Total:
EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING -ATL
Total:
TYLER/EDEN REINSTALL
Total:
DIG ALERTS - STATE FEES
DIG ALERT - MONTHLY TICKETS
Total:
VEHICLE REPAIR PART
Total:
REIMBURSEMENT FOR ICSC WESl
Total:
DOG WASTE STATION
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers
Amount
359.97
3,466.00
3,466.00
478.33
18,980.22
899.31
20,357.86
220.00
220.00
203.00
203.00
1,400.00
1,400.00
53.60 139.50
193.10
57.95 57.95
185.59
185.59
495.63
495.63
2,480,620.43
2,480,620.43
vchlist
10/24/2024 1 :34:SOPM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Date ----------------- Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount -----------------__ ___,; __________ ------ Pcepared
Date:
b� �
\{).2Jr·'J� �
fh--
Approved by: . f
Date: / 11/m /'Pl/
vchlist
10/24/2024 3:01:17PM
Bank code : ub!=len
Voucher
137596
Date Vendor
10/24/2024 10020 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by:_______...���j����,_____..�---�
Date: ____ __,,R<A.----.-� v;
r'l-1wJH'-'b---'vi � o
Approved by=----------�- · �- . ,..,..��-- Date:____ ;Jjvy /Vf Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
LEGAL SVCS SEP 2024
------ PO# Description/Account
LEGAL SVCS SEP 2024
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers :
Amount
86,820.31
86,820.31
86,820.31
86,820.31
vchlist
10/29/2024 3:20:14PM
Bank code : ubi:ien
Voucher
10243
Date Vendor
10/29/2024 10353 PERS
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by: �Ytk
Date �� :�7'edb�� �
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
10 24 3
------ PO# Description/Account
RETIRMENT PAYMENT
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers :
Amount
157,352.31
157,352.31
157,352.31
157,352.31
vchlist Voucher List
10/30/2024 2:37:19PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
137597 10/30/2024 14800 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 3717428210927 137598 10/30/2024 10010 AIS TRUST ACCOUNT NEWPORT 2834301 137599 10/30/2024 15380 ANDERSON, MARK 1111
137600 10/30/2024 14363 ANGUS ASPHALT INC 2R
FINAL
137601 10/30/2024 13568 CALIFORNIA DEBT & INVESTMENT 32885 137602 10/30/2024 14448 CAMACHO, MARIO 2854
137603 10/30/2024 13523 CATS EXCAVATING INC. 2301
137604 10/30/2024 10032 CINTAS CORPORATION 694 4207673587 137605 10/30/2024 10050 CITY OF EL CAJON 2116
137606 10/30/2024 12153 CORODATA RECORDS 7028164
137607 10/30/2024 11862 CORODATA SHREDDING INC DN1489492 137608 10/30/2024 10171 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AUDITOR & 09/2024 AGENCY REV PO# Description/Account
54827 VEHICLE SUPPLIES
Total:
BREWS & BITES INSURANCE
Total:
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
Total:
PROGRESS PAYMENT #2 - RETEN1
54962 PROGRESS PAYMENT #2 - FINAL
Total:
CDIAC REPORTING - POSTAGE MA
Total:
EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT
Total:
54844 MISC SHOP RENTALS
Total:
JPA MEMBERSHIP - FY25 Q2
Total:
54996 RECORD STORAGE,RETRIEVAL&D
Total:
DOCUMENT SERVICES
Total:
09/2024 AGENCY PARK CITE REPT
Total:
Amount
296.30
296.3(])
2,073.00
2,073.0()
240.00
240.0()
-9,087.25
181,745.00
172,657.75
5.86 5.86
200.00
200.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
72.31 72.31
112,421.50
112,421.50
698.41
698.41
49.82 49.82
92.50 92.50
vchlist Voucher List
10/30/2024 2:37:19PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubQen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
137609 10/30/2024 10333 COX COMMUNICATIONS 063453006; OCT24 064114701; OCT24
137610 10/30/2024 15363 CRANE, WILLIAM 09232024WC
137611 10/30/2024 14675 EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL 20241008C 54681 137612 10/30/2024 10054 ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO 09302024 54983 137613 10/30/2024 14977 EMS LOGIK NARCBOX 35091 54999
137614 10/30/2024 12964 ESQ SOLUTIONS INC ES0-151359 55025 137615 10/30/2024 15382 FAST TIMES LLC 985 55036
137616 10/30/2024 10251 FEDERAL EXPRESS 8-661-65794
137617 10/30/2024 10009 FIRE ETC 191159 54800
137618 10/30/2024 12638 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY, INC. INV1029938 137619 10/30/2024 11881 GOODEN, CHRIS 2024MSA-CHRIS
137620 10/30/2024 11196 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES 9230519473 54803 137621 10/30/2024 10556 HECKMAN, HEATHER 11122024HH
Description/Account
9534 VIA ZAPADOR
8115 ARLETTE ST
Total:
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
ARPA FUNDED SHELTER SERVICE!
Total:
CDBG SUBRECIPIENT
Total:
EMS EQUIPMENT
Total:
ANNUAL SOFTWARE RENEWAL
Total:
BREWS & BITES ENTERTAINMENT
Total:
FEDEX SHIPPING CHARGES
Total:
EQUIPMENT SERVICE
Total:
LIABILITY CLAIM FEE
Total:
MSA CONFERENE PER DIEM
Total:
STATION SUPPLIES
Total:
PER DIEM
Amount
97.80 195.60
293.4()
128.38
128.38
9,520.00
9,520.00
1,490.82
1,490.82
3,000.00
3,000.00
5,228.70
5,228.70
6,500.00
6,500.00
95.89 95.89
148.95
148.95
25.00 25.00
175.00
175.00
777.31
777.31
250.00
vchlist Voucher List
10/30/2024 2:37:19PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubQen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
137621 10/30/2024 10556 10556 HECKMAN, HEATHER (Continued) 137622 10/30/2024 15251 I PERMIT 3489
137623 10/30/2024 11864 KIRKLAND PRINTING & MAILING 603236 55020 137624 10/30/2024 10997 LAKESIDE FIRE PROTECTION 09/30/24 9302025 54972
137625 10/30/2024 10413 LARSON, SCOTT 82644C
137626 10/30/2024 15409 LEVEL 3 CONSTRUCTION 2406
137627 10/30/2024 10204 LIFE ASSIST INC 1517039 54807
1517151 54807
1517215 54807
1517242 54807
1518108 54807
137628 10/30/2024 10538 MEALS ON WHEELS 1-24-25A 54965
137629 10/30/2024 10238 MILLER, STEVE 100324
137630 10/30/2024 14208 MINUTEMAN PRESS EL CAJON 66187 55046 66228 55046
137631 10/30/2024 12991 NATIONAL LIGHTING SUPPLY LLC 156602 54931 Description/Account
Total:
PERMIT#B-RALT-24-0066 REFUND
Total:
CENTRAL SUPPLIES
Total:
FY25 Q1 RECONCILIATION & DISTF
NURSE COORDINATOR FY25 Q1
Total:
EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
REFUNDABLE DEVELOPER DEPO!:
Total:
EMS SUPPLIES
EMS SUPPLIES
EMS SUPPLIES
EMS SUPPLIES
EMS SUPPLIES
Total:
CDBG SUPRECIPIENT
Total:
PARK REPAIR SUPPLIES
Total:
BUS CARDS
BUS CARDS
Total:
LIGHTING/ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
Total:
Amount
250.00
237.74
237.74
1,416.91
1,416.91
810,323.65
19,617.56
829,941.21
234.05
234.05
1,500.00
1,500.00
352.17
400.17
260.22
10.36 558.90
1,581.82
1,383.25
1,383.25
185.32
185.32
107.18
107.18
214.36
818.18
818.18
vchlist Voucher List
10/30/2024 2:37:19PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubr;ien
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
137632 10/30/2024 15403 PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL 2906 137633 10/30/2024 12062 PURETEC INDUSTRIAL WATER 2213284 2213285
137634 10/30/2024 10095 RASA 5832
137635 10/30/2024 10798 RENS BERRY, SAM 2024MSA-SAM
137636 10/30/2024 14881 SANCON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CIP2023-20-6P CIP2023-20-6R
137637 10/30/2024 10110 SECTRAN SECURITY INC 24100609
137638 10/30/2024 12113 SNAGWOLF INC 25555
137639 10/30/2024 10217 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 6013696761
6013766035
6013995319
6014058558
137640 10/30/2024 10027 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 767336
137641 10/30/2024 10250 THE EAST COUNTY 00146609
137642 10/30/2024 10536 THE FILIPINO PRESS INC 8257-24b PO# Description/Account
TRAINING
Total:
55043 DEIONIZED WATER SERVICE
55043 DEIONIZED WATER SERVICE
Total:
54976 MAP CHECK - POPEYE'S
Total:
MSA CONFERENE PER DIEM
Total:
54600 CITYWIDE CMP LINING AND REHAE
PROGRESS PAYMENT #6 RETENTII
Total:
54924 FY 24/25 ARMORED CAR TRANSPC
Total:
55008 GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SUPPLIES
Total:
54870 FY 24/25 OFFICE SUPPLIES - P&B,
54897 OFFICE SUPPLIES
54869 FY 24/25 OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINAt
54869 FY 24/25 OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINAt
Total:
FINGERPRINT COSTS
Total:
PUBLIC NOTICE - CDBG CAPER PY
Total:
NOTICE OF ELECTION PUBLICATIC
Total:
Amount
595.00
595.00
75.15 149.16
224.31
525.00
525.00
175.00
175.00
28,894.00
-1,444.70
27,449.30
171.66
171.66
2,412.29
2,412.29
163.54
125.74
58.38 36.84
384.50
64.00 64.00
112.00
112.00
225.00
225.00
vchlist
10/30/2024 2:37:19PM
Bank code : ub�en
Voucher
137643
137644
137645
137646
137647
137648
Date ----------------- Vendor
10/30/2024 14354 TRILOGY MEDWASTE WEST, LLC
10/30/2024 12480 UNITED SITE SERVICES
10/30/2024 11194 USAFACT INC
10/30/2024 10475 VERIZON WIRELESS
10/30/2024 10475 VERIZON WIRELESS
10/30/2024 14868 YOGATREX
52 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
52 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by T�flv
Date: _ __,._,_,_rt) ....._,,_,_1?{)_,.__,_,v-+:,--�-
Approved by: ______ � __ _:::_.,,._____,_ ___ _
Date= 1�/oa {Zf/
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
1623005
1623006
114-13924610
114-13924617
114-13950075
4053390
9975989942
9975989941
0026
PO#
54913
54913
54339
54339
54339
Description/Account
BIOMEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL
BIOMEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL
Total:
PORTABLE TOILET AND FENCE RE
PORTABLE TOILET AND FENCE RE
PORTABLE TOILET AND FENCE RE
Total:
BACKGROUND CHECKS
Total:
WIFI SERVICE
Total:
CELL PHONE SERVICE
Total:
WELLNESS EVENT
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers :
Amount
230.65
229.10
459.75
95.52 1,515.60
250.00
1,861.12
92.60 92.60
1,140.29
1,140.29
984.80
984.80
150.00
150.00
1, 192,480.36
1,192,480.36
vchlist
10/31/2024 4:25:48PM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher Date ----------------- Vendor
1553 10/30/2024 10955 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
1642 10/23/2024 10956 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
2 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
2 Vouchers in this report
Prepacedbyc� L
App�,edb
Date �, P--=
Date: U ,Z,..
'
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
PPE 10/23/24
PPE 10/23/24
PO# Description/Account
FED WITHHOLDING & MEDICARE
Total:
CA STATE TAX WITHHELD
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers :
Amount
113,689.28
113,689.28
38,587.19
38,587.19
152,276.47
152,276.47
vchlist
10/31/2024 12:10:30PM
Bank code : ubQen
Voucher
137650
Date Vendor
10/31/2024 10001 US BANK
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
00000000
000003
000041
000042
000829
001689
0034603
007247A
010190
011670
012444
01286
015244
017929
019156
019831
020989
021163
0241826
025893
025919
030952
033002
036244
037968
040067
042209
04270-15234410
0511956
054380
056701
062965
063692
0637053
065355
067454
------ PO# Description/Account
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
WELLNESS EVENT SUPPLIES
WELLNESS SUPPLIES
WELLNESS SUPPLIES
INTERVIEW SUPPLIES
SPECIAL EVENTS SUPPLIES
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES
CONSULTING SERVICES
MEETING & OFFICE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS MEETING
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES
ZONE CHIEFS MEETING
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES
SENIOR SUPPLIES
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SENIOR SUPPLIES
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
TEEN CENTER SUPPLIES
WELLNESS EVENT SUPPLIES
TEEN CENTER SUPPLIES
MEETING SUPPLIES
INTERVIEW SUPPLIES
MEETING SUPPLIES
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
VEHICLE REPAIR
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
MEETING SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING SUPPLIES
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES
Amount
55.00 1,111.42
793.12
263.88
61.85 68.15
71.10 12,873.63
148.96
150.87
277.43
62.10 22.20
56.50 59.26
82.63 242.31
119.60
64.64 20.98
118.89
143.95
69.05 38.97
87.70 33.53
11.45 149.90
30.08 428.86
42.17 1,790.10
12.79 83.56
11.98 246.83
vchlist Voucher List
10/31/2024 12:10:30PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ub!'.)en
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137650 10/31/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
070921 AED BATIERIES 36.59
072619 STATION EQUIPMENT 242.43
073267 INTERVIEW SUPPLIES 27.19
077064 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE! 72.57
080649 SENIOR PROGRAM SUPPLIES 23.79
0819455 SMALL TOOLS 43.09
082032 MIRCO SD CARD FOR CAMERAS 23.71
08222024 MEMORY STICKS 38.77
086063 WELLNESS SUPPLIES 11.83
086337 MOVIE IN THE PARK SUPPLIES 5.91
087702 STATION EQUIPMENT 1,681.85
09022024 EVENT PROMOTION 90.00
09122024MB MEETING SUPPLIES 21.50
092120 SPECIAL EVENTS SUPPLIES 14.98
092324 WELLNESS SUPPLIES 9.43
093949 OFFICE SUPPLIES 191.32
094704 MEETING SUPPLIES 15.28
098576 MEETING SUPPLIES 10.63
1 WELLNESS SUPPLIES 206.66
100001701 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT 481.40
10022024 FITNESS PROGRAM SUBSCRIPTIO 49.50
10139 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 550.00
1014631 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 120.56
1014658 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 31.25
11008 MMASC CONFERENCE 10.00
1136977617 STATION EQUIPMENT 571.07
1230367 OFFICE SUPPLIES 26.92
13111184 FALL BROCHURE PRINTING 350.12
1318119 SIGNATURE RUBBER STAMPS 169.17
1318119 - B SHIPPING REFUND FOR STAMPS -52.80
1319 MEMBERSHIP DUES 50.00
13620775 TABLE TOP SPONSOR 250.00
13987 MEETING SUPPLIES 22.86
141172 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT 195.11
1504209 VEHICLE EQUIPMENT 38.78
15676 MEETING SUPPLIES 21.21
vchlist
10/31/2024 12:10:30PM
Bank code : ubqen
Date Vendor
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher Invoice
137650
----------------
10/31/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
163391DE
163391 DE-02
"'
1641803
170257
17460
192142-A
192142-B
202576
203789
2299308
23066571
235320
247824
28866335
28936181
295
2984251
3 3025609
3025610
3032439
3033230
3115
3196-SH
32013575
33355
35876
3FBYWN
4 4010989
406151
4068449
4137
42103
438918
4584241
PO# Description/Account Amount
BREWS & BITES PROMOTIONS 17.14
BREWS & BITES ONLINE PROMOTI 50.60
ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 18.86
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 140.00
SENIOR TRIP 600.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES 709.09
OFFICE SUPPLIES - REFUND -13.04
STATION SUPPLIES 469.00
ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 11.98
MOVIE IN THE PARK MOVIE LICEN� 685.00
EQUIPMENT REPAIR 495.90
TEEN CENTER SUPPLIES 32.16
JUDICIARY COMMITIEE HEARING 190.16
BREWS & BITES BANNERS 373.81
BREWS & BITES FLYERS 133.76
ROBLAR FIRE 53.17
OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.51
INTERVIEW SUPPLIES 54.64
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 77.58
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 72.99
ARCHIVE BOXES FOR PB&E 87.08
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 27.98
EVENT CONTRACT 490.00
MILITARY SUPPORT 229.71
INTERVIEW SUPPLIES 83.25
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 133.50
SHIPPING CHARGE 28.93
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 103.98
INTERVIEW SUPPLIES 32.76
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 80.58
WEARING APPAREL 115.00
MEETING EXPENSES 327.68
EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 41.37
TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 89.94
TRAINING MATERIALS 1,315.26
SENIOR SUPPLIES 39.37
vchlist Voucher List
10/31/2024 12:10:30PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ub!=)en
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137650 10/31/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
467651 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 125.00
483812 WELLNESS EVENT SUPPLIES 80.17
4991421 VEHICLE EQUIPMENT 291.14
4ZLGV1 :53ZC7H:53ZN9W SHELLY/GOLDCOMPLEX/PK FIRES 3,433.51 5012872 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 178.11
5013876 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 75.39
516515 ROBLAR FIRE 45.22
5483441 MOVIE IN THE PARK SUPPLIES 19.13
5512872 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 52.19
5873051 OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.32
6013657 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 61.29
6021168 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 75.21
6024 STATION SUPPLIES 563.85
6152207 HOTEL RESERVATION FOR APA CA 370.79
625296 ROBLAR FIRE 99.33
63469 AED SUPPLIES 91.59
6349CR CR-TRAINING EQUIPMENT -79.05
6457033 OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.81
6501 MEETING SUPPLIES 58.52
690952 PUB ED SUPPLIES 887.90
695373 ZONE CHIEFS MEETING 24.00
6-MITP MOVIE IN THE PARK SUPPLIES 25.83
7021102 WEARING APPAREL 345.38
70514 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 342.41
74387 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT 117.81
7555425 OFFICE SUPPLIES 26.92
76747 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 19.35
77156-A REGISTRATION 12.00
77156-B SUBSCRIPTION 28.79
78494 DOMAIN NAME RENEWAL 181.36
8022767 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 149.99
8173869 WEARING APPAREL 104.44
8225859 OFFICE SUPPLIES 104.38
8282024 TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 33.72
8458659 WELLNESS EVENT SUPPLIES 93.88
8510597 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 2.69
vchlist Voucher List
10/31/2024 12:10:30PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ub!=Jen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137650 10/31/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
85566 EVENT BANNERS 219.29
8588246b OFFICE SUPPLIES 12.76
86260 WELLNESS SUPPLIES 292.60
8710638 OFFICE SUPPLIES 138.20
8739432 VEHICLE EQUIPMENT 61.20
87576 SUPPLIES 124.58
8769849 OFFICE SUPPLIES 59.83
889436 ROBLAR FIRE 113.03
9.11.2024.A WEARING APPAREL 161.62
9.11.2024.B WEARING APPAREL 10.78
9022597 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 130.29
90273 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,237.19
9059459 FACILITY SUPPLIES 57.33
9254604 WEARING APPAREL 53.84
92564 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 96.91
92567 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 10.75
93103 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 89.28
93127 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PART 86.18
94090 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT 940.90
944436252 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10.00
9510456 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 20.95
9521850 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 35.71
9645005 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR AP FINANC 97.49
9939454 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR AP FINANC 125.84
C3A35L VEHICLE REPAIR PART 441.93
DEL71437 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 518.14
FF63618 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT 534.97
FM3288C262 FACEBOOK BOOST FOR FIELDS 24.45
FTE0-007722 MOVIE IN THE PARK HEALTH PERI\, 369.00
HFLTKE591 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT 60.47
MC16071873 MAILCHIMP PREMIUM PLAN 350.00
MyHdDP WEBSITE ACCESSIBILITY SOFTWA 748.00
NQAGM88262 BREWS AND BITES FACEBOOK BO 75.00
Nqdqfy INTERVIEW SUPPLIES 117.79
RK87A9G262 BREWS AND BITES FACEBOOK BO 75.00
SA5552140 EVENT PROMOTION 640.22
vchlist
10/31/2024 12:10�30PM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher Amount
137650
Date ----------------- Vendor --------- Invoice ------ PO # ----=------------ Description/Account ------ 10/31/2024 10001 US BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
��::�red by:-'<-T---I-T-"'- 1A_)����-��-
Approved by: _________
if).�� z_-c_.---�------ �
Date: -----------;''ml-Hll ('.,.-, tJ ivr31 ·t/1
(Continued)
SA5620696
V2VTPYXP5Y55RB4BE
WM79538051
EVENT SUPPLIES
PRINTER AND SUPPLIES
FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers :
384.34
320.04
111.60
50,011.69
50,011.69
50,011.69
vchlist
10/31/2024 1 :50:46PM
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
137651
137652
137653
137654
137655
137656
137657
137658
137659
Date Vendor ----------------- Invoice ----------
10/31/2024 12724 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE 0775149
10/31/2024 12903 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE CO 23539178 10/31/2024 14452 MEDICAL AIR SERVICES ASSC
10/31/2024 10424 SANTEE FIREFIGHTERS
10/31/2024 10776 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10/31/2024 10776 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10/31/2024 14467 TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
10/31/2024 10001 US BANK
10/31/2024 14600 WASHINGTON STATE SUPPORT
9 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
9 Vouchers in this report
23539188
1928193
PPE 10/23/24
PPE 10/23/24
PPE 10/23/24
SMOFOU20240814001
PPE 10/23/24
PPE 9/11/24
PPE 10/23/24
PO# Description/Account
VOLUNTARY LIFE INS-AM FIDELITY
Total:
FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT
FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT
Total:
MEDICAL AIR TRANSPORT SVCS
Total:
DUES/PEG/BENEVOLENT/BC EXP
Total:
WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:
WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:
VOLUNTARY INS RIDERS
Total:
PARS RETIREMENT
PARS RETIREMENT
Total:
WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers
Amount
4,262.88
4,262.88
3,064.37
3,064.37
6,128.74
193.00
193.00
4,780.59
4,780.59
449.53
449.53
260.30
260.30
499.35
499.35
1,926.56
1,566.46
3,493.02
751.84
751.84
20,819.25
20,819.25
vchlist
10/31/2024 1:50:46PM
Bank code:
Voucher Date Vendor /
Approved bY.c.:· -:=,,�,------j�"V-'""-'---------
Date: _�...-.--�--"--7---
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice ------- PO# Description/Account Amount
PyBatch
10/28/2024 5:00:37PM
EARNINGS SECTION
Type Hours/units Rate Amount Src Plan
Grand Totals Employees:
acot 33.00 2,503.35 bnvl
acrtnp 48.00 399.91 catax
adtk 4.50 270.12 chdsp1
aertnp 48.00 240.15 chdsp2 atkn 670.00 30,055.26
bttxnp 200.00 chdsp5
caco 121.00 ct1cs1
coun 3,555.60 fedtax
ctkn 78.12 3,465.95 icma
detd 21.25 1,154.09 icmacc
detu 77.25 2,927.15 icmaln
flsa 6,009.60 medtax ftkn 7.00 414.47
hacc 12.96 mt1cs1
htkn 4.00 284.97 mt2cs1
jury 12.00 828.59 pars
!wop 49.25 per625
mayr 1,498.06 pers
mltk 24.00 525.65
otsb 12.00 673.70
pert2m
otth 1,984.75 111,108.09 pert2s
precep 209.50 1,022.67 pert3s
pth 1,509.25 35,743.24 rhsa2%
r 10,999.00 520,367.36 rhsabc
reto 17.71 roth
retp 234.17 sb-1
retr 663.17 sb-3
stbkpt 50.48 sffa stdb 450.00
stkn 406.63 18,042.24 sffapc
stknpt 24.50 422.10 st1cs3
ststkn 48.00 2,257.20 st2cs3
unif 600.00 vision
unifp 650.00
vacp 18.96 395.50
vtkn 275.50 14,036.25
went 240.00 9,967.74
wctx 76.50 3,418.22
Grand 17,065.40 774,402.28
Totals
Payroll Processing Report
CITY OF SANTEE
10/10/2024 to 10/23/2024-3 Cycle b
DEDUCTIONS SECTION
Base Wages Deduction Benefit/Cont LvPlan
200
108.57 a-fire
672,131.56 38,587.19 afir40
260.30 c-fire
449.53 c-misc
751.84 comp
44,059.39 440.61 -440.61 f-flex
672,131.56 91,567.76 gen
210,965.11 27,629.56 m-fhol
769.24 s-bc's
4,507.00 4,800.22 s-cm
759,429.59 11,109.63 11,011.89 s-fchf
s-fire 108,675.40 1,086.74 -1,086.74 s-misc 48,696.63 486.97 -486.97 s-pth 25,686.39 963.28 963.28 sfir40
198,131.37 15,355.18 15,592.96 sradmi
244,556.37 20,923.34 57,223.00 v-exec
48,696.63 3,408.76 5,785.17 v-mgmt
15,855.73 1,427.02 3,957.59 vac-cm
121,863.91 17,670.30 17,938.39
223,031.62 4,447.65
35,355.99 707.13
75,417.82 8,136.56
93.00 72.17
3,636.70
1,035.32
91,821.58 2,754.65 -2,754.65
15,855.73 475.67 -475.67
17,274.63
253,938.00 112,444.53
LEAVE SECTION
Accrued Taken Banked Lost
646.46 664.00 2.50
7.08 6.00
37.00 112.50
39.00 66.00
2.12 3.00
7.00 230.37 216.46
4.00 12.96
22.14 3.69
3.69 339.48 211.50
332.11 195.13
24.50 50.48
3.69 4.50
37.87 27.00
160.42 51.00 7.70
7.70 S>YE
�
to {'&3[z_i
,o/,_d2.-'{
�qy
� �v\ ·. \<:)�
Gross: 774,402.28 I
Net: 520,464.28
<< No Errors/ 13 Warnings >>
� \0 �J'l\ \I"�
vchlist
11/01/2024 9:59:49AM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
6455120
6715839
Date Vendor
11/1/2024 14705 RHS MISSIONSQUARE
11/1/2024 14704 457 MISSIONSQUARE
2 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
2 Vouchers in this report
Prapaced bye'-k;._c�
Date: I\� Appcoved
Date: 0'/?�� -=1,-; ��---
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
PPE 10/23/24
PPE 10/23/24
------ PO# Description/Account
RETIREE HSA
Total:
ICMA-457
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers :
Amount
5,154.78
5,154.78
41,335.58
41,335.58
46,490.36
46,490.36
vchlist
11/04/2024 4:11 :59PM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher List
CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher Amount
10244
Date ------------------
Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account -----------------------'----------------- 11/5/2024 10353 PERS
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by: �ih__-d
Date: {��
App«Ned byP--h,-,oP'uJ)j_=p=---------
Date: If��-
10 24 4 RETIREMENT PAYMENT
Total:
Bank total:
Total vouchers :
159,446.71
159,446.71
159,446.71
159,446.71
LEGAL SERVICES BILLING SUMMARY Attachment 1
OCTOBER 2024
CURRENT INVOICE
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER NOTES
Retainer $ 17,898.25 1010504
1001.00.1201.51020 17,898.25
Labor & Employment:
Labor & Employment 5,931.80 1010451
Employee Benefits 816.60 1010458
1001.00.1201.51020 6,748.40
Litigation & Claims:
Litigation & Claims 2,572.10 1010452
Allan Family Trust Litigation 579.30 1010475
Parcel 4 Litigation 991.22 1010462
Schaeffer Receivership 1,489.95 1010476
Sky Ranch Potential Homeowner/HOA Litigation 980.00 1010465 Hope for the Homeless Lakeside Inc. 3,153.34 1010478
1001.00.1201.51020 9,765.91
Special Projects (General Fund):
Community Oriented Policing 9,268.41 1010454
Annual Municipal Code Update 4,508.40 1010466
CEQA Special Advice 1,069.30 1010479
Water Quality 289.00 1010456
General Elections 260.10 1010457
Entertainment District 895.90 1010459
Parcel 4 Hotel 86.70 1010460
Housing Element 6,849.30 1010461
Advanced Records Center Services for PRA 8,624.40 1010467 Cannabis 4,091.20 1010468
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 583.12 1010463
General Telecommunications Work 57.80 1010469
Safety-Environ Justice Element 664.70 1010470
Records Management Policy 1,329.40 1010471
Development Impact Fee Study 2,427.60 1010473
Special Training 1,676.20 1010472
Surplus Land Act/Real Property Special Advice 289.00 1010474 Atlas Tower (non-environmental) 144.50 1010482
1001.00.1201.51020 43,115.03
Mobile Home Rent Control Commission 86.70 1010455 2901.04.4106.51020 Cuyamaca Street Right-of-Way Acquisition 520.20 1010464 cip71402.30.05 606.90
Redevelopment of Carlton Oaks Golf Course 1,241.20 1010480 tm19001a.10.05 Palisade Warehouse 1,498.00 1010484 dr23002a.10.05
Summit Townhomes 1,027.20 1010485 tm23003a.10.05
Aubrey Glen Design Review 1,326.80 1010486 tm24003a.10.05 5,093.20
Total $ 83,227.69
LEGAL SERVICES BILLING RECAP Attachment 2
FY 2024-25
Adopted Revised Previously Spent Available Current Request Category Budget Budget Year to Date Balance Mo./Yr. Amount General Fund:
General / Retainer $ 216,530.00 $ 216,530.00 $ 54,000.33 $ 162,529.67 Oct-24 17,898.25 $ Labor & Employment 80,000.00 80,000.00 31,882.72 48,117.28 Oct-24 6,748.40 Litigation & Claims 75,000.00 75,000.00 77,721.00 (2,721.00) Oct-24 9,765.91 Special Projects 520,000.00 520,000.00 123,543.20 396,456.80 Oct-24 43,115.03 Total $ 891,530.00 $ 891,530.00 $ 287,147.25 $ 604,382.75 $ 77,527.59 Other City Funds:
MHFP Commission $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 3,130.41 $ 6,869.59 Oct-24 $ 86.70 Capital Projects 5,000.00 5,000.00 1,187.80 3,812.20 Oct-24 520.20 SLEMSA JPA 10,000.00 10,000.00 - 10,000.00 Oct-24 -
Total $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 4,318.21 $ 20,681.79 $ 606.90 Third-Party Reimbursable:
Total $ 13,781.60 $ 5,093.20
`
Total Previously Spent to Date
Total Proposed for Payment
General Fund $ 287,147.25 General Fund $ 77,527.59
Other City Funds 4,318.21 Other City Funds 606.90
Applicant Deposits or Grants 13,781.60 Applicant Deposits or Grants 5,093.20 Total $ 305,247.06 Total $ 83,227.69
FY 2024-25
RESOLUTION NO.
1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AN AMENDED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974
WHEREAS, the State of California enacted the Political Reform Act of 1974, Government Code Section 81000, et seq. (the "Act"), which contains provisions relating to conflicts of interest which potentially affect all officers, employees and consultants of the City of Santee (the “City”), and requires all public agencies to adopt and promulgate a conflict of interest code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Conflict of Interest Code (the "Code") which was amended on November 18, 2020, in compliance with the Act; and WHEREAS, subsequent changed circumstances within the City have made it advisable and necessary pursuant to Sections 87306 and 87307 of the Act to amend and update the City’s Code; and
WHEREAS, the potential penalties for violation of the provisions of the Act are substantial and may include criminal and civil liability, as well as equitable relief which could result in the City being restrained or prevented from acting in cases where the provisions of the Act may have been violated; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of a public meeting on, and of consideration by the City Council of, the proposed amended Code was provided to each affected designated position and was publicly posted for review at the offices of the City; and
WHEREAS, a public meeting was held upon the proposed amended Code at a regular meeting of the City Council on November 13, 2024, at which all present were given an opportunity to be heard on the proposed amended Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, as follows:
Section 1. The City Council does hereby approve and adopt the proposed amended Conflict of Interest Code, a copy of which is attached hereto and shall be on file with the City Clerk and available to the public for inspection and copying; Section 2. The said amended Conflict of Interest Code shall become effective at the time of its adoption and approval.
RESOLUTION NO.
2 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a regular meeting thereof held this 13th day of November 2024, by the following roll call vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
Attachment: Amended Conflict of Interest Code
1 November 2024
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE
CITY OF SANTEE
2 November 2024
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR THE
CITY OF SANTEE
(Amended November 1813, 20202024)
The Political Reform Act (Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation (2 Cal. Code of Regs. § 18730) which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code, which can be incorporated by reference in an agency’s code. After public notice and hearing it may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of 2 California Code of Regulations section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission are hereby incorporated by reference. This incorporation page, Regulation 18730, and the attached Appendix designating positions and establishing disclosure categories, shall constitute the conflict of interest code of the City of Santee (the “City”).
The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney and the City Treasurer, may must electronically file their annual statements of economic interests directly with the Fair Political Practices Commission. All other officials and designated positions required to submit a statement of economic interests shall file their statements with the City Clerk as the City’s Filing Officer. The City Clerk shall retain the original statements filed by all other officials and designated positions and make all statements available for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours. (Gov. Code § 81008.)
All officials and designated positions required to submit a statement of economic interests shall receive ethics training as required pursuant to Government Code section 53235 (AB 1234). The City’s Filing Officer shall annually provide all filers with information on training available to meet the requirements of Section 53235 and maintain required records indicating the dates that filers satisfied the training requirements and the entity that provided the training. These records shall be retained for five years after the date of training and are public records subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act. (Gov. Code § 53235.2.)
3 November 2024
APPENDIX
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE
CITY OF SANTEE
(Amended November 1813, 20202024)
PART “A-1”
The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the City Treasurer, and all other City Officials who manage public investments as defined by 2 Cal. Code of Regs. § 18700.3(b), are NOT subject to the City’s Code but must file disclosure statements under Government Code Section 87200 et seq. [Regs. § 18730(b)(3)]
OFFICIALS WHO MANAGE PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
It has been determined that the positions listed below are Other City Officials who manage public investments1. These positions are listed here for informational purposes only.
Director of Finance Director/City Treasurer
Financial Consultants
1 Individuals holding one of the above-listed positions may contact the Fair Political Practices Commission for assistance or written advice regarding their filing obligations if they believe that their position has been categorized incorrectly. The Fair Political Practices Commission makes the final determination whether a position is covered by § 87200. 4 November 2024
DESIGNATED POSITIONS
GOVERNED BY THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
Assistant City Clerk 5
Assistant Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Assistant Planner 2, 3, 5, 6
Assistant to the City Manager 1
Associate Civil Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Associate Planner 2, 3, 5, 6
Associate Traffic Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Building Inspector 5, 6
Building Official 2, 3, 5, 6
Building Supervisor 2, 3, 5, 6
Building Technician (I and II) 5, 6
City Attorney (not filing under Gov Code 87200) 1, 2
City Clerk 5
City Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
City Planner 2, 3, 5, 6
Code Compliance Assistant 6
Code Compliance Officer 5, 6
Confidential Senior Human Resources Analyst 5
Deputy City Clerk 5
Deputy City Manager 1, 2
Deputy Fire Chief 5, 6
Development Services Technician 2, 3, 6
Director of Community Services 2, 3, 5, 6
Director of Development Services 1, 2
Director of Engineering/City Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Director of Fire and Life Safety/Fire Chief 2, 3, 5, 6
5 November 2024
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
Director of Human Resources & Risk Management 5
Director of Planning and Building/City Planner 2, 3, 5, 6 Economic Development Manager 1, 2
Engineering Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6
Equipment Mechanic 5
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 5
Field Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6
Finance Manager 5
Fire Battalion Chief 5
Fire Division Chief 5, 6
Fire Inspector 5, 6
Fire Marshal 5, 6
Fire Prevention Specialist 5, 6
Information Technology Analyst 5
Information Technology Manager 5
Junior Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Junior Planner 2, 3, 5, 6
Lead Equipment Mechanic 5
Management Analyst 5
Marketing Coordinator 5
Marketing Manager 5
Park and Landscape Supervisor 2, 3, 5
Planning Director 1, 2
Principal Civil Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Principal Planner 2, 3, 5, 6
Principal Traffic Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Procurement Specialist 4
6 November 2024
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
Project Manager 2, 3, 5, 6
Public Services Manager 2, 3, 5
Public Works Supervisor 5
Recreation Coordinator 5
Recreation Services Manager 5
Recreation Supervisor 5
Senior Building Inspector 5, 6
Senior Civil Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Senior Human Resources Analyst 5
Senior Management Analyst 5
Senior Planner 2, 3, 5, 6
Senior Traffic Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Special Events Supervisor 5
Stormwater Program Coordinator 5, 6
Special Projects Coordinator 2, 3, 5
Stormwater Program Manager 5, 6
MEMBERS OF BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
Manufactured Home Fair Practices Commission 1, 2
7 November 2024
OTHER
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
Consultants and New Positions 2
PART “A-2”
BOARD MEMBERS OF SEPARATE AGENCIES GOVERNED BY THE CITY’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE:
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
CDC Successor Agency 1, 2
2 Individuals providing services as a consultant as defined in FPPC Reg 18700.3(a) or in a new position created since this Code was last approved that makes or participates in making decisions shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure set forth in this Code subject to the following limitation:
The City Manager may determine that, due to the range of duties or contractual obligations, it is more appropriate to designate a limited disclosure requirement. A clear explanation of the duties and a statement of the extent of the disclosure requirements must be in a written document (Gov. Code Sec. 82019; FPPC Regulations 18219 and 18734). The City Manager’s determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. (Gov. Code Sec. 81008.)
8 November 2024
PART “B”
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
The disclosure categories listed below identify the types of economic interests that the Designated Position must disclose for each disclosure category to which he or she is assigned.3 “Investment” means financial interest in any business entity (including a consulting business or other independent contracting business) and are reportable if they are either located in or doing business in the jurisdiction, are planning to do business in the jurisdiction, or have done business during the previous two years in the jurisdiction of the City.
Category 1: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that are located in, do business in or own real property within the jurisdiction of the City.
Category 2: All interests in real property which is located in whole or in part within, or not more than two (2) miles outside, the jurisdiction of the City, including any leasehold, beneficial or ownership interest or option to acquire property.
Category 3: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that are engaged in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property within the jurisdiction of the City.
Category 4: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that provide services, products, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the City.
Category 5: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that provide services, products, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the Designated Position’s department, unit or division.
Category 6: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, subject to the regulatory, permit, or licensing authority of the Designated Position’s department, unit or division. 3 This Conflict of Interest Code does not require the reporting of gifts from outside this agency’s jurisdiction if the source does not have some connection with or bearing upon the functions or duties of the position. (Reg. 18730.1)
1 November 2024
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE
CITY OF SANTEE
2 November 2024
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR THE
CITY OF SANTEE
(Amended November 13, 2024)
The Political Reform Act (Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation (2 Cal. Code of Regs. § 18730) which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code, which can be incorporated by reference in an agency’s code. After public notice and hearing it may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of 2 California Code of Regulations section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission are hereby incorporated by reference. This incorporation page, Regulation 18730, and the attached Appendix designating positions and establishing disclosure categories, shall constitute the conflict of interest code of the City of Santee (the “City”).
The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney and the City Treasurer, must electronically file their annual statements of economic interests directly with the Fair Political Practices Commission. All other officials and designated positions required to submit a statement of economic interests shall file their statements with the City Clerk as the City’s Filing Officer. The City Clerk shall retain the original statements filed by all other officials and designated positions and make all statements available for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours. (Gov. Code § 81008.)
All officials and designated positions required to submit a statement of economic interests shall receive ethics training as required pursuant to Government Code section 53235 (AB 1234). The City’s Filing Officer shall annually provide all filers with information on training available to meet the requirements of Section 53235 and maintain required records indicating the dates that filers satisfied the training requirements and the entity that provided the training. These records shall be retained for five years after the date of training and are public records subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act. (Gov. Code § 53235.2.)
3 November 2024
APPENDIX
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE
CITY OF SANTEE
(Amended November 13, 2024)
PART “A-1”
The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the City Treasurer, and all other City Officials who manage public investments as defined by 2 Cal. Code of Regs. § 18700.3(b), are NOT subject to the City’s Code but must file disclosure statements under Government Code Section 87200 et seq. [Regs. § 18730(b)(3)]
OFFICIALS WHO MANAGE PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
It has been determined that the positions listed below are Other City Officials who manage public investments1. These positions are listed here for informational purposes only.
Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Financial Consultants
1 Individuals holding one of the above-listed positions may contact the Fair Political Practices Commission for assistance or written advice regarding their filing obligations if they believe that their position has been categorized incorrectly. The Fair Political Practices Commission makes the final determination whether a position is covered by § 87200. 4 November 2024
DESIGNATED POSITIONS
GOVERNED BY THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
Assistant City Clerk 5
Assistant Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Assistant Planner 2, 3, 5, 6
Associate Civil Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Associate Planner 2, 3, 5, 6
Associate Traffic Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Building Inspector 5, 6
Building Official 2, 3, 5, 6
Building Supervisor 2, 3, 5, 6
Building Technician (I and II) 5, 6
City Attorney (not filing under Gov Code 87200) 1, 2
City Clerk 5
Code Compliance Assistant 6
Code Compliance Officer 5, 6
Confidential Senior Human Resources Analyst 5
Deputy Fire Chief 5, 6
Development Services Technician 2, 3, 6
Director of Community Services 2, 3, 5, 6
Director of Engineering/City Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Director of Fire and Life Safety/Fire Chief 2, 3, 5, 6
Director of Human Resources & Risk Management 5
Director of Planning and Building/City Planner 2, 3, 5, 6 Economic Development Manager 1, 2
Engineering Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6
Equipment Mechanic 5
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 5
5 November 2024
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
Field Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6
Finance Manager 5
Fire Battalion Chief 5
Fire Inspector 5, 6
Fire Marshal 5, 6
Fire Prevention Specialist 5, 6
Information Technology Analyst 5
Information Technology Manager 5
Lead Equipment Mechanic 5
Management Analyst 5
Marketing Manager 5
Park and Landscape Supervisor 2, 3, 5
Principal Civil Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Principal Planner 2, 3, 5, 6
Principal Traffic Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Procurement Specialist 4
Project Manager 2, 3, 5, 6
Public Services Manager 2, 3, 5
Public Works Supervisor 5
Recreation Coordinator 5
Recreation Services Manager 5
Recreation Supervisor 5
Senior Building Inspector 5, 6
Senior Civil Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Senior Human Resources Analyst 5
Senior Management Analyst 5
Senior Planner 2, 3, 5, 6
6 November 2024
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
Senior Traffic Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Special Events Supervisor 5
Stormwater Program Coordinator 5, 6
MEMBERS OF BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
Manufactured Home Fair Practices Commission 1, 2
OTHER
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
Consultants and New Positions 2
PART “A-2”
BOARD MEMBERS OF SEPARATE AGENCIES GOVERNED BY THE CITY’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE:
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’
TITLE OR FUNCTION
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED
CDC Successor Agency 1, 2
2 Individuals providing services as a consultant as defined in FPPC Reg 18700.3(a) or in a new position created since this Code was last approved that makes or participates in making decisions shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure set forth in this Code subject to the following limitation:
The City Manager may determine that, due to the range of duties or contractual obligations, it is more appropriate to designate a limited disclosure requirement. A clear explanation of the duties and a statement of the extent of the disclosure requirements must be in a written document (Gov. Code Sec. 82019; FPPC Regulations 18219 and 18734). The City Manager’s determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. (Gov. Code Sec. 81008.)
7 November 2024
PART “B”
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
The disclosure categories listed below identify the types of economic interests that the Designated Position must disclose for each disclosure category to which he or she is assigned.3 “Investment” means financial interest in any business entity (including a consulting business or other independent contracting business) and are reportable if they are either located in or doing business in the jurisdiction, are planning to do business in the jurisdiction, or have done business during the previous two years in the jurisdiction of the City.
Category 1: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that are located in, do business in or own real property within the jurisdiction of the City.
Category 2: All interests in real property which is located in whole or in part within, or not more than two (2) miles outside, the jurisdiction of the City, including any leasehold, beneficial or ownership interest or option to acquire property.
Category 3: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that are engaged in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property within the jurisdiction of the City.
Category 4: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that provide services, products, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the City.
Category 5: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that provide services, products, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the Designated Position’s department, unit or division.
Category 6: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, subject to the regulatory, permit, or licensing authority of the Designated Position’s department, unit or division. 3 This Conflict of Interest Code does not require the reporting of gifts from outside this agency’s jurisdiction if the source does not have some connection with or bearing upon the functions or duties of the position. (Reg. 18730.1)
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ARPA-FUNDED AGREEMENT
AMENDMENTS WITH THE EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER AND
PATH SAN DIEGO FOR HOMELESSNESSNESS PREVENTION SERVICES WHEREAS, the City Manager submitted and presented to the City Council for its review and approval an updated expenditure plan for the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding at the December 13, 2023, City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, the updated ARPA expenditure plan approved by the City Council in the amount of $306,600 included $150,000 to be used to provide resources to homeless individuals through the East County Transitional Living Center (ECTLC) and PATH (People Assisting the Homeless) San Diego; and
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2024, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute the ARPA-funded agreements with ECTLC and PATH San Diego for homelessness prevention services in the amount of $100,000 and $50,000, respectively; and WHEREAS, the homelessness prevention services funding approved on January 24, 2024, has been exhausted and City Council authorized ARPA funding remaining from the December 12, 2023, appropriation is available to continue these programs which provide a pathway to housing for persons currently experiencing homelessness in Santee; and WHEREAS, the ECTLC has provided the City a $100,000 proposal to provide emergency shelter, meals, and case management for up to 28 days and PATH San Diego has provided a proposal to provide homeless outreach staffing for nine months for $87,475; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to execute the ARPA-funded grant agreement amendments for homelessness services with the ECTLC and PATH San Diego.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, that the City Manager is authorized to execute the ARPA-funded agreement amendments with East County Transitional Living Center and PATH San Diego for homelessness services in the amounts of $100,000 and $87,475, respectively.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular Meeting thereof held this 13th day of November 2024, by the following roll call vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF 120 NEW DELL PRECISION 3460 SMALL FORM
FACTOR WORKSTATIONS TO REPLACE EXISTING WORKSTATIONS THROUGH THE MINNESOTA NASPO VALUEPOINT AGREEMENT #23026
WHEREAS, the City needs 120 new workstations (desktop computers) for use by City employees; and
WHEREAS, the purchase of new workstations is based on the need for updated hardware to enhance security and to replace older non-compliant workstations; and WHEREAS, the purchase is funded by the IT Technology Replacement Program account; and
WHEREAS, Santee Municipal Code Section 3.24.130 Cooperative Purchasing allows purchasing of materials through Cooperative Purchasing Programs; and WHEREAS, there is an existing cooperative Participating Addendum (purchasing contract) between Dell Marketing L.P. and the State of California Department of General Services that the City could utilize for procurement of workstations; and WHEREAS, there is an existing cooperative Master Agreement (purchasing contract) between Dell Marketing L.P. and the State of Minnesota that the City could utilize for procurement of workstations; and
WHEREAS, the Purchasing Agent has reviewed these procurements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, as follows:
SECTION 1. Approve the procurement of 120 Dell Precision 3460 Small Form Factor workstations from Dell Marketing L.P. through its Participating Addendum No. 7-23-70-55-01 with the State of California in the amount of $99,128.40.
SECTION 2: This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15302(c) of the CEQA Guidelines.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular meeting thereof held this 13th day of November 2024 by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING THE PROCUREMENT OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINETS AND CONTROLLERS FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADE PROJECT CIP 2023-09, AND
FINDING THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15302(C)
WHEREAS, the traffic signal upgrade project CIP2023-09 will upgrade ten (10) traffic signal controllers; and
WHEREAS, the project is included in the adopted Capital Improvement Program as part of the Traffic Signal and Communications Upgrade Project; and WHEREAS, the project is funded with Traffic Signal Fees and Traffic Mitigation Fees; and
WHEREAS, Santee Municipal Code Section 3.24.130 Cooperative Purchasing allows purchasing of materials through Cooperative Purchasing Programs; and WHEREAS, there is an existing cooperative purchasing contract between Swarco/McCain Inc. and the County of San Diego that the City could utilize for procurement of traffic signal cabinets; and
WHEREAS, there is an existing cooperative purchasing contract between Swarco/McCain Inc. and the Virginia Information Technologies Agency that the City could utilize for procurement of traffic signal controllers; and WHEREAS, the Purchasing Agent has reviewed these procurements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, as follows:
SECTION 1. Approve The procurement of ten (10) 332L traffic signal cabinets from Swarco/McCain Inc. through its contract #568549 with the County of San Diego in the amount of $145,020.73.
SECTION 2. Approve The procurement of ten (10) 2070LX controllers for the same ten (10) intersections from Swarco/McCain Inc. through its contract VA-170808-MCCI, with the Virginia Information Technologies Agency in the amount of $32,603.21.
SECTION 3: This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15302(c) of the CEQA Guidelines.
RESOLUTION NO. __________
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular meeting thereof held this 13th day of November, 2024, by the following roll call vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
____________________________________________
QUOTATION
Estimator: Melissa Lanini
Quote #: MRL091324A (760)734-5086
Agency: Santee City of [email protected]
Job Name:332L Cabinets
Bid Date: 10/18/24
Bid Item Qnty Description Price Extension
10 332L CABINET, ANODIZED W/BEST
LOCKS
$16,085.00 $160,850.00
1 OUTLET STRIP, 15A, 6 POS REAR W/SURGE,
RACK MOUNT, GEIST SPT064-10, 29424
2 DOOR AJAR SW ASY,332,N.C NORTH
CAROLINA
1 CMU, 2010ECLIP W/10/100 ETHERNET PORT,
EDI
1 RED MONITOR KIT
1 ISO, DC, 242L, EDI ISOLATOR
2 204 FLASHER
4 430 F.T.R.
12 200 LOAD SWITCH
1 LAMP KIT, 2 LED M73249 JKL, FRONT & REAR
SWITCHES JUMPERED
1 LEXAN BREAKER COVER KIT
1 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
PRICING FROM SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CONTRACT 568649
10 DISCOUNT FOR REMOVING
DETECTORS AND TWO OF THE 242L
ISOLATORS
-$2,626.00 -$26,260.00
10 2070LX CONTROLLER, TEES 2009 VITA
CONTRACT PRICING
$1,829.00 $18,290.00
10 OMNI INTERSECTION CONTROL
SOFTWARE
$1,000.00 $10,000.00
10 UPGRADE ADDER 2070LX
CONTROLLER, TEES 2020; 1C T20, 2E+
T20, 3B T20, 4A - EB4
$196.82 $1,968.20
PRICING FROM VITA CONTRACT VA170808-MCCI
TIMING NOT INCLUDED
ADAPTIVE NOT INCLUDED
TURN ON SUPPORT NOT INCLUDED
Tax 7.75% *subject to change $12,775.74
Reference Total $177,623.94
Prices firm for 90 days. Freight included. Add sales tax.
Sale is subject to Swarco's standard terms and conditions.
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. ,
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Independent Traffic Signal Upgrade Project CIP 2023-09
Map of locations
Carlton Hills Blvd
at Soyer Ave
Carlton Hills Blvd at
Willowgrove Ave
Carlton Hills Blvd
Carlton Oaks Dr at at Carlton Oaks Dr
Pebble Beach Dr
Carlton Oaks Dr
at Fanita Pkwy
Prospect Ave
at Fanita Dr
Prospect Ave
at Ellsworth Ln
Prospect Ave at
Atlas View Dr
Prospect Ave
at Olive Ln
Woodside Ave at
Davidann Rd
SR 52 Operational Improvements Project Description
The proposed project would provide improvements and congestion relief for commuters in east San Diego County, in addition to supporting an economic link for the region. With a multi-modal and alternative transportation goal, the project would make the following improvements:
• Convert the existing two-way bike path on the north side of the freeway to a 4.7-mile long westbound auxiliary/truck climbing lane from Mast Boulevard to Santo Road • Restripe westbound SR-52 from 2 lanes to 3 lanes from SR 125 to Mast Boulevard • Relocate the existing 4.6-mile long two-way bike path on the north side of the freeway to the south side including one 10-foot wide light weight cantilevered separated bike path on two existing bridges, respectively
• Restripe eastbound SR-52 from 2 lanes to 3 lanes from Mast Boulevard to east of the San Diego River Bridge, eliminating the lane drop at Mast Boulevard and maintaining three eastbound through lanes to SR 125
• Widen the westbound on-ramp from Mast Boulevard to SR 52 to a two-lane ramp. • Convert the westbound #I lane to either an HOV or Managed Lane (possible to phase in later)
These improvements will reduce peak hour travel time by up to 33% and improve traffic flow on this regionally significant corridor that will benefit east county residents, freight movement, military personnel, education institutions, and emergency evacuation and response. It will improve quality of life and enhance economic vitality of the region.
Project limits
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA,
REJECTING THE BID SUBMITTED BY CONSTRUCTION & INDUSTRIAL ROOFING CO., INC. AND AWARDING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO AOS INC. DBA SUPERIOR ROOFING FOR THE CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS – BUILDING 6 ROOF REPLACEMENT (CIP 2024-31) PROJECT AND DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”) PER STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15301 (c)
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2024, City staff administered a formal bid process in compliance with Santee Municipal Code Section 3.24.100; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk, on October 31, 2024, publicly opened and examined sealed bids for the City Hall Improvements – Building 6 Roof Replacement (CIP 2024-31) Project (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, the lowest received bid was submitted by Construction & Industrial Roofing Co., Inc. in the amount of $68,319.50; and
WHEREAS, the bid received by Construction & Industrial Roofing Co., Inc. was deemed non-responsive due to the omission of a required document at the time of bid submission and therefore is rejected; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Santee Municipal Code section 3.24.100(E), staff has determined that the bid submitted by AOS Inc. dba Superior Roofing conforms in all material respects to the requirements set forth in the invitation for bids; and WHEREAS, AOS Inc. dba Superior Roofing was found to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder with their total bid amount of $90,879.00; and WHEREAS, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to AOS Inc. dba Superior Roofing in the amount of $90,879.00; and
WHEREAS, staff requests authorization for the Director of Engineering/City Engineer to approve change orders in a total amount not to exceed $13,632.00 for unforeseen items and additional work associated with the Project; and WHEREAS, the project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, as follows:
SECTION 1: The Recitals provided above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this Resolution.
SECTION 2: The bid submitted by Construction & Industrial Roofing Co., Inc. was deemed non-responsive by Staff due to the omission of a required document at the time of bid submission and is rejected.
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION 3: The construction contract for the City Hall Improvements – Building 6 Roof Replacement (CIP 2024-31) Project is awarded to AOS Inc. dba Superior Roofing as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder in the amount of $90,879.00 and the City Manager is authorized to execute all necessary contract documents on behalf of the City.
SECTION 4: The Director of Engineering/City Engineer, is authorized to approve change orders in an amount not to exceed $13,632.00 for unforeseen items and additional work associated with the Project.
SECTION 5: The project is categorically exempt from environmental review under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(c), Existing Facilities.
SECTION 6: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Santee City Hall, 10601 Magnolia Avenue, Santee, CA 92071. The City Clerk is the custodian of record of those proceedings.
SECTION 7: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular meeting thereof held this 13th day of November, 2024 by the following roll call vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
$105,000.00
$68,319.50
$90,879.00 $92,765.00
$98,893.00
$104,400.00
$104,498.30
$110,510.00
$127,335.31
$135,550.00 $136,582.00
$0
$25,000
$50,000
$75,000
$100,000
$125,000
$150,000
Engineer's
Estimate
Commerical &
Industrial
Roofing Co.,
Inc.
AOS Inc. DBA
Superior
Roofing
A Good
Roofer, Inc.
A Preman
Roofing, Inc.
JB Homes
Services, Inc.
DBA Boyce's
Roofing &
Repair
Rainy Day
Roofing, Inc.
ACCI Roofing
Services
Durable Cool
Roofs, Inc.
Pacific
Builders &
Roofing, Inc.
Sylvester
Roofing Co,
Inc.
CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS - BUILDING 6 ROOF REPLACEMENT
CIP 2024-31
PROJECT MAP
SHEET 1 OF 1
CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS
BUILDING 6 ROOF REPLACEMENT, CIP 2024-31
CITY OF SANTEE, CITY HALL
10601 MAGNOLIA AVENUE
SANTEE, CA 92071
SOUTH DRIVEWAY
NORTH DRIVEWAY BUILDING 6MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ROOF REPLACEMENT
SCALE: NTS
CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING BUILDING 4 BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2
BUILDING 3
BUILDING 8 BUILDING 5
BUILDING 7
STAFF REPORT
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF A NEW 2025 FORD E450 CHASSIS
WITH REMOUNT OF EXISTING AMBULANCE MODULE ONTO THE NEW CHASSIS AND TRADE-IN OF A 2017 FORD E450 CHASSIS, ALL WITH BRAUN NORTHWEST, INC. PER HGACBUY CONTRACT AM10-23
November 13, 2024
Funding in the amount of $200,320 is included in the FY 2024-25 Vehicle Replacement Fund budget to purchase a new 2025 Ford E450 chassis with the remount of an existing ambulance module onto the new chassis and trade-in of a 2017 Ford E450 chassis, all with Braun Northwest, Inc. This resolution also includes the appropriation of an additional $10,790.95 from the Emergency Medical Services Fund to complete this purchase. This additional appropriation is included to increase the contingency fund from $5,000 to 5% of the total purchase amount (for a total contingency of $9,504.37) and to extend the base warranty provided by Braun from three years to five years.
Santee Municipal Code 3.24.130 authorizes the City to join with other public jurisdictions in cooperative purchasing plans or programs as determined by the purchasing agent to be in the City’s best interest. On October 1, 2023, HGACBuy, a cooperative purchasing program of the Houston-Galveston Area Council of Governments, of which the City is a member, completed a competitive request for proposals process for the purchase of Ambulances, EMS, and Other Special Service Vehicles. Based on evaluation criteria such as pricing, selection and variety of products offered, customer support and ability to meet the contract requirements, Braun Northwest, Inc. was awarded Product AM23CE05- Remount of North Star Module onto a Ford E450.
It is best practice for the replacement chassis to match or be compatible with the existing ambulance module and others currently utilized by the Fire Department. Based on the compatibility and reliability requirements for emergency response equipment and positive feedback from the City’s existing Ford E450s, the Ford chassis provides the best option for remounting the City’s existing medic module. It is, therefore, in the City’s best interest to purchase the Ford chassis.
Braun Northwest, Inc., of Chehalis, Washington, is a certified Qualified Vehicle Modifier (QVM). The quote reflects pricing pursuant to HGACBuy Contract AM10-23 which was publicly bid and substantially complied with the City’s formal bidding procedures in Santee Municipal Code Section 3.24.100. Braun Northwest, Inc. is also an authorized Ford vendor. Braun Northwest, Inc. is the only West Coast vendor that sells and mounts the Braun Northwest North Star medic unit modules, which the City now uses exclusively for its ambulances.
The total projected base cost, including select add-ons and is $190,087.38. The total purchase is for an amount not to exceed $211,105.95, which includes add-ons purchased from separate vendors not to exceed not to exceed $11,514.20 and the $9,504.37 (5% contingency) for any unforeseen changes:
1. Base Price HGAC CE05 $104,412.00
2. Published/unpublished options $ 63,980.00
3. HGAC Buy Discount <$ 1,500.00>
4. Trade-in – Used Chassis <$ 500.00>
SUBTOTAL for one (1) vehicle $166,392.00
5. CA sales tax @ 7.75% $ 12,895.38
6. Extended Warranty (non-taxable) $ 7,200.00
7. Delivery Fee (non-taxable) $ 3,000.00
8. HGAC Fee (non-taxable) $ 600.00
Total F.O.B. Chehalis, WA $190,087.38
9. After-market Add-ons (separate vendors) $ 11,514.20
10.Contingency Fund $ 9,504.37
TOTAL COST: $211,105.95
Staff requests authorization to purchase a new 2025 Ford E450 chassis and remount of an existing ambulance module onto the new chassis from Braun Northwest, Inc., and select add-ons, such as graphics, replacement radios, radio chargers, iPad mounts, extended warranty, etc., for an amount not to exceed $201,601.58. This total includes $500.00 credit that the City will receive for the 2017 Ford E450 chassis (V-187). Staff also request that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve additional expenditures for unforeseen changes in an amount not to exceed $9,504.37, which is a 5% contingency, for a grand total of $211,105.95.
RESOLUTION NO.
1 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF A NEW 2025 FORD E450 CHASSIS
WITH REMOUNT OF EXISTING AMBULANCE MODULE ONTO THE NEW CHASSIS AND TRADE-IN OF A 2017 FORD E450 CHASSIS, ALL WITH BRAUN NORTHWEST, INC. PER HGACBUY CONTRACT AM10-23
WHEREAS, the aging of City’s 2017 Ford E450 chassis, Vehicle #187 (“V-187”), normal mileage, and ordinary wear and tear have compromised the Fire Department’s availability of a reliable vehicle; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to purchase one (1) new 2025 Ford E450 chassis, remove an existing ambulance module from V-187, and remount the ambulance module onto the new chassis; and
WHEREAS, selected add-on items are recommended for purchase separately from other vendors to bring the vehicle up to modern use; and WHEREAS, the City of Santee FY 2024-25 Vehicle Replacement fund budget includes an appropriation of $200,320.00 to replace the chassis of V-187, and to remount and refurbish its ambulance module; and
WHEREAS, Santee Municipal Code 3.24.130 authorizes the City to purchase equipment and supplies by joining with other public jurisdictions in cooperative purchasing plans or programs from a vendor at a price established by a competitive or competitively negotiated bid by another public agency as long as that bid substantially complied with the formal bidding procedures in Santee Municipal Code Section 3.24.100; and WHEREAS, on October 1, 2023, HGACBuy, a cooperative purchasing program of the Houston-Galveston Area Council of Governments, of which the City is a member, completed a competitive request for proposals process for the purchase of Ambulances, EMS, and Other Special Service Vehicles; and
WHEREAS, Braun Northwest, Inc., of Chehalis, Washington, was awarded HGACBuy Contract #AM10-23; and
WHEREAS, Braun Northwest, Inc., quote reflects pricing pursuant to HGACBuy Contract AM10-23, which was publicly bid and substantially complies with the City’s formal bidding procedures; and
WHEREAS, Braun Northwest, Inc. was awarded Product AM23CE05-Remount of North Star Module onto a Ford E450; and
WHEREAS, Braun Northwest, Inc., will also accept V-187 as a trade-in; and WHEREAS, due to increasing the contingency fund from $5,000 to 5% of the purchase price and adding an extended warranty beyond the base warranty, the purchase price is now $211,105.95, an additional total of $10,786.00 will need to be appropriated from the Emergency Medical Services Fund Reserve to the FY 2024-25 Vehicle Replacement Fund budget; and
RESOLUTION NO.
2 WHEREAS, this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, as it has no potential for resulting in a physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve utilizing HGACBuy Contract #AM10-23 to purchase one new 2025 Ford E450 with the remount of the ambulance module and add-ons, and a 5% contingency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, as follows:
SECTION 1. The Recitals provided above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this Resolution.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Santee hereby:
1. Authorizes the purchase of a new 2025 Ford E450 chassis from Braun Northwest, Inc., and the removal and remount of the existing ambulance module onto the new Ford chassis by Braun Northwest, Inc., including extended warranty in an amount of $190,087.38; and
2. Authorizes the City Manager to approve additional expenditures for unforeseen changes in the amount not to exceed $9,504.37 (5% contingency); and
3. Authorizes the open market purchase of select add-ons, such as graphics and radios, in the amount not to exceed $11,514.20; and
4. Authorizes the trade-in of V-187, a 2017 Ford E-450 chassis credit in the amount of $500; and
5. Authorizes the City Manager to transfer and appropriate $10,786.00 from the Emergency Medical Services Fund to the FY 2024-25 Vehicle Replacement Fund budget; and
6. Authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to accomplish the purchase, trade-in, and remount with Braun Northwest, Inc.
SECTION 3. The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, as it has no potential for resulting in a physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
SECTION 4. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the Resolution which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, RESOLUTION NO.
3 and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular Meeting thereof held this November 13, 2024, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________________________
JAMES JEFFRIES, CMC, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF NEW LION FIRST RESPONDER PPE
STRUCTURAL FIREFIGHTING CLOTHING (TURNOUTS) FROM ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC. PER SOURCEWELL CONTRACT #010424-LIO
WHEREAS, the City of Santee’s (“City”) amended FY 24/25 Fire and Life Safety Department operating budget includes funding for the purchase of structural firefighting clothing (turnouts); and
WHEREAS, Santee Municipal Code Section 3.24.130 authorizes the City to join other public jurisdictions in cooperative purchasing plans or programs as determined by the purchasing agent to be in the City’s best interest; and WHEREAS, in March 2024, Sourcewell, a State of Minnesota local government agency and service cooperative, of which the City is a member, completed a competitive request for proposals process for procurement of firefighting personal protective equipment with related equipment cleaning that substantially complied with the formal purchasing procedures as provided in Section 3.24.180 of the Santee Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, based on evaluation criteria such as pricing, selection and variety of products offered, customer support and ability to meet the contract requirements, LION First Responder PPE, Inc. was awarded Contract #10424-LIO for firefighting personal protective apparel and accessories for an initial term of three years plus three annual options to renew; and
WHEREAS, LION First Responder PPE, Inc. has designated Allstar Fire Equipment Inc. as the sole source for LION’s NFPA 1971 compliant LION® brand turnouts, multi-threat CBRN, gloves, hoods and boots to the municipal fire service market in California; and.
WHEREAS, staff has evaluated the pricing, products and support provided by the Sourcewell Contract #010424-LIO and desires to use Sourcewell Contract #010424-LIO to purchase eighteen (18) structural firefighting coats and eighteen (18) pairs of structural firefighting pants (turnouts) for the Fire and Life Safety Department to outfit new firefighters and to replace existing turnouts that failed annual testing and cannot remain in service.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Santee, California, hereby:
1. Authorizes the purchase eighteen (18) structural firefighting coats and eighteen (18) pairs of structural firefighting pants (turnouts) from Allstar Fire Equipment, Inc. per Sourcewell Contract #010424-LIO for an amount not to exceed $66,251.17; and
2. Authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.
RESOLUTION NO.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular Meeting thereof held this 13th day of November 2024, by the following roll call vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA,
RATIFICATION AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR THE FLSA DETERMINATION RELATED TO 56-HOUR WORK WEEK BATTALION CHIEFS
BASED UPON A NON-EXEMPT STATUS DETERMINATION
WHEREAS, based on a review and analysis of the position of Fire Battalion Chief, the duties of that job, and the needs of the City, the Fire Battalion Chief has been reclassified to be a non-exempt position pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); and
WHEREAS, effective February 16, 2023, Fire Battalion Chiefs began receiving overtime pay (1.5 times pay) for all hours worked beyond their respective shift assignments; and
WHEREAS, Fire Battalion Chiefs work on a three platoon 24-hour shift schedule with a regularly recurring work schedule of 24 days, equating to 56-hours worked per week on average; and
WHEREAS, the FLSA 207(k) partial exemption (29 C.F.R. § 553.210) allows public safety employers to compensate for regular earnings for up to 53 hours in a 7-day work period; and
WHEREAS, based upon the FLSA 207(k) partial exemption related to this classification, compensation for three overtime hours must be paid when employees work a 56-hour work week; and
WHEREAS, based upon the timing of the reclassification of the position to nonexempt, the City of Santee will be providing retroactive compensation for Fire Battalion Chiefs from July 1, 2024, to present date in compliance with FLSA requirements, and pay for overtime moving forward in compliance with the FLSA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, that the City Council hereby:
1. Authorizes the appropriation of funds for the FLSA Fire Battalion Chief pay in the amount of $15,000 from General Fund Reserves to the FY 2024-25 Fire Department Operations Budget.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular Meeting thereof held this 13th day of November 2024, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
Comprehensive Development
Impact Fee Nexus Study
City of Santee
November 2024
Prepared For: Prepared By:
101 Progress #250
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 655-3900
This page intentionally left blank.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study i November 2024 City of Santee
Table of Contents
Section 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Program Administration Fee ..................................................................................... 5 Fee Adjustment Procedures ..................................................................................... 6 Timing of Fee Payment ............................................................................................ 7 Section 2 Legal Context and Methodology ........................................................................... 8 Nexus Requirement Summary ................................................................................. 8 AB602 ...................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 10 Section 3 Population and Land Use Assumptions ............................................................ 11 Land Use Types ..................................................................................................... 11 Growth Forecasts ................................................................................................... 11 Average Unit Sizes ................................................................................................. 14 Section 4 Public Facilities Fee ............................................................................................. 15 Background ............................................................................................................ 15 Service Population ................................................................................................. 15 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 15 Planned Level of Service........................................................................................ 17 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 18 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 20 Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections ....................................... 20 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 22 Section 5 Traffic Signal Fee ................................................................................................. 24 Background ............................................................................................................ 24 Trips ..................................................................................................................... 26 Service Population ................................................................................................. 29 Cost Summary ....................................................................................................... 29 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 29 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 31 Reduced Traffic Fee ............................................................................................... 31 Revenue Projections .............................................................................................. 32 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 33 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 33 Section 6 Traffic Mitigation Fee ........................................................................................... 35 Background ............................................................................................................ 35 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study ii November 2024 City of Santee
Service Population ................................................................................................. 36 Cost Summary ....................................................................................................... 36 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 37 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 39 Reduced Traffic Fee ............................................................................................... 39 Revenue Projections .............................................................................................. 40 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 41 Section 7 Drainage Fee ......................................................................................................... 43 Background ............................................................................................................ 43 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 43 Planned Level of Service........................................................................................ 45 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 45 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 46 Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections ....................................... 46 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 47 Section 8 Parks-in-Lieu Fee ................................................................................................. 50 Background ............................................................................................................ 50 Parkland ................................................................................................................. 50 Service Population ................................................................................................. 51 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 51 Planned Level of Service........................................................................................ 52 Fee Credits ............................................................................................................. 53 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 54 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 54 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 55 Section 9 Fire Facilities Fee ................................................................................................. 57 Background ............................................................................................................ 57 Service Population ................................................................................................. 57 Cost Summary ....................................................................................................... 57 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 60 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 61 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 62 Capital Improvements and Revenue Projections ................................................... 63 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 64 Section 10 Long Range Planning Fee ................................................................................... 67 Background ............................................................................................................ 67 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 67 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study iii November 2024 City of Santee
Planned Level of Service........................................................................................ 68 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 69 Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections ....................................... 69 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 70 Section 11 Program Administration Fee ............................................................................... 72 Background ............................................................................................................ 72 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 74 Section 12 Implementation and Administration ................................................................... 76 Implementation ....................................................................................................... 76 Fee Program Administrative Requirements ........................................................... 76 Fee Adjustment Procedures ................................................................................... 78 Timing of Fee Payment .......................................................................................... 78 Credits and Reimbursement Policies ..................................................................... 78 Administrative Fee.................................................................................................. 78 Programming Revenues with the CIP .................................................................... 79 Fee Reporting ........................................................................................................ 79 Accessory Dwelling Units ....................................................................................... 79 Specialized Development Projects ......................................................................... 80 Rebuild or Expansion Projects ............................................................................... 80 Appendix A Capital Improvement Program………………………………………………………..81 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study iv November 2024 City of Santee
Tables
Table 1-1: Summary of Proposed Development Impact Fees ...................................................... 3 Table 1-2: Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (Residential) ...................................................................................................................... 4 Table 1-3: Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (NonResidential) ...................................................................................................................... 5 Table 3-1: Existing and Future Land Uses .................................................................................. 12 Table 3-2: Existing Service Population ....................................................................................... 12 Table 3-3: Estimated Service Population at Buildout .................................................................. 13 Table 3-4: Persons per Household & Employment Density ........................................................ 13 Table 3-5: Residential Land Use Average Unit Size ................................................................... 14 Table 4-1: Existing Public Facilities ............................................................................................ 16 Table 4-2: Existing Level of Service per Resident ...................................................................... 17 Table 4-3: Existing Level of Service for Parkland ....................................................................... 18 Table 4-4: Population Allocation for Recreation Facilities ........................................................... 19 Table 4-5: Planned New Public Facilities .................................................................................... 19 Table 4-6: Park Facilities Construction Costs per Resident ........................................................ 20 Table 4-7: Public Facility Cost per Resident ............................................................................... 20 Table 4-8: Public Facilities Fee Cost Summary .......................................................................... 20 Table 4-9: Public Facilities Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout ................................................ 21 Table 5-1: Traffic Signal Facilities – Planned Facilities ............................................................... 24 Table 5-2: Existing Traffic Signal Facilities (page 1 of 2) ............................................................ 25 Table 5-3: Trip Rates per Land Use ............................................................................................ 27 Table 5-4: Existing Vehicle Trips ................................................................................................ 27 Table 5-5: New Vehicle Trips ...................................................................................................... 28 Table 5-6: Total Vehicle Trips ..................................................................................................... 28 Table 5-7: Traffic Signal Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip ............................................................ 30 Table 5-8: Traffic Signal Existing Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip ............................................... 31 Table 5-9: Traffic Signal Fee Summary ...................................................................................... 31 Table 5-10: Anticipated Traffic Signal Fee Collection at Buildout ............................................... 32 Table 5-11: Existing Level of Service per Vehicle Trip ............................................................... 33 Table 6-1: Traffic Mitigation Facilities – Planned Facilities ......................................................... 35 Table 6-2: Future Additional Trips ............................................................................................... 36 Table 6-3: Existing Trips ............................................................................................................. 38 Table 6-4: Traffic Mitigation Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip ....................................................... 39 Table 6-5: Traffic Mitigation Fee Summary ................................................................................. 39 Table 6-6: Anticipated Traffic Mitigation Fee Collection at Buildout ............................................ 41 Table 7-1: Existing Drainage Facilities ........................................................................................ 44 Table 7-2: Drainage Facilities Cost per Impervious Acre ............................................................ 45 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study v November 2024 City of Santee
Table 7-3: Drainage Fee Summary ............................................................................................. 46 Table 7-4: Anticipated Future Drainage Projects ........................................................................ 47 Table 7-5: Drainage Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout ........................................................... 47 Table 8-1: Parkland Inventory List .............................................................................................. 51 Table 8-2: Existing Level of Service per Resident ...................................................................... 52 Table 8-3: Parkland Cost per Resident ....................................................................................... 54 Table 8-4: Parks-in-Lieu Fee Cost Summary .............................................................................. 55 Table 9-1: Fire Facilities Inventory List ....................................................................................... 58 Table 9-2: Fire Facilities Planned Facilities ................................................................................ 59 Table 9-3: Fire Facilities Level of Service per Capita ................................................................. 61 Table 9-4: Fire Facilities Fee Summary ...................................................................................... 62 Table 9-5: Fire Facilities Existing Level of Service ..................................................................... 63 Table 9-6: Costs of Future Fire Facilities .................................................................................... 64 Table 9-7: Anticipated Fire Facilities Estimated Revenue at Buildout......................................... 64 Table 10-1: Long Range Planning Elements Cost ...................................................................... 67 Table 10-2: Long Range Planning Cost per Resident/Worker .................................................... 68 Table 10-3: Long Range Planning Fee Summary ....................................................................... 69 Table 10-4: Anticipated Long Range Planning Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout .................. 70 Table 11-1: Program Administration Fee .................................................................................... 73 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 1 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 1 Executive Summary
Introduction
The City of Santee (City) is a suburban city located in San Diego County (County). Located in the eastern part of the San Diego metropolitan area, Santee is bordered by El Cajon on the south and southeast, the City of San Diego on the west and northwest, and the County of San Diego on east and northeast. The City is located just 18 miles from the Pacific Ocean and is bisected by the San Diego river, a large greenbelt that includes parks, trails, and over 1,100 acres of natural riparian habitat. Santee is connected to the coastline by State Route 52, a six-lane freeway that connects Interstate 5 in La Jolla to State Route 67. State Route 125 also intersects with State Route 52, forming a transportation hub in the heart of the City.
The City was incorporated in 1980 after beginning as a community of ranches originally named Cowleston after founder George A. Cowles. The City was renamed Santee in 1893 after Milton Santee, a local civil engineer and real estate developer. The City features extensive hiking and mountain biking trails, and the 700-acre Town Center district forms a downtown core comprised of business parks, high-density residential and retail businesses. The Town Center Community Park, located along the San Diego River, features a 15-acre sports field complex and an aquatics center.
As of January 1, 2023, the California Department of Finance (DOF) estimates that the City population is 59,227. As the resident population and non-resident employment in the City increase, there exists a correlating rise in the demand for public infrastructure and services to support growth within the City. California’s Assembly Bill 1600 (AB1600) adopted in 1987 and codified as California Government Code Section 66000 et. seq., allows the City to impose Development Impact Fees on new development within the City. Development Impact Fees (DIFs) are a one-time charge on new development that is collected and used by the City to cover the cost of capital facilities, vehicles, and equipment that are required to serve new growth.
The City of Santee General Plan 2020 (General Plan) was adopted on August 23, 2003, and is comprised of the following nine elements: Land Use; Housing; Mobility; Recreation; Trails; Conservation; Noise; Safety; and Community Enhancement. The City’s Housing Element was adopted in May 2022 in conformance with the 2021-2029 update cycle for jurisdictions in the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) region and was reviewed with the rest of the General Plan to ensure internal consistency. The City’s General Plan and updated Housing Element form the basis of the City’s current development impact fee program along with land use projections and service population derived from the City Planning Department’s land use analysis.
As stated in the Housing Element, most of the City's residentially zoned land has already been developed with a diversity of housing types, including single-family homes, mobile home parks, Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 2 November 2024 City of Santee
townhomes, condominiums and apartments. However, several hundred acres within the Specific Plan District and the Town Center District remain undeveloped and available for future housing development.
The Nexus Study is based on the General Plan Buildout, based on the land use projects derived from the Housing Element and City Planning Department’s land use analysis. As stated in the Land Use chapter of the General Plan, the City's future is tied to the type and amount of new development it can accommodate at General Plan Buildout. Projecting future buildout capacity requires consideration of several variables and is based on assumed densities (dwelling units per acre) and intensity factors that include allowed lot coverage and floor-to-area ratios (FAR), parking requirements, etc. While some of today's developed lands may change in the coming years, most of the assumed City buildout is on remaining vacant lands planned for residential and employmentgenerating uses.
The City’s Housing Element was adopted May 11, 2022. The Housing Element was updated in conformance with the 2021-2029 update cycle for jurisdictions in the SANDAG region and has been reviewed with the rest of the General Plan to ensure internal consistency. As portions of the General Plan are amended in the future, the Plan (including the Housing Element) will be reviewed to ensure that internal consistency is maintained.
The goal of the City is to develop a fee program that achieves the objectives laid out in the General Plan and associated Master Plans, balances fee levels with desired economic growth, and complies with the legal requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (AB1600/Government Code Section 66000 et seq.), Assembly Bill 602 (AB602), and the standards established by Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v City of Tigard (1994) which require that impact fees have an “essential nexus” to each development project they are charged on and must be charged in “rough proportionality” to the impact caused by the new development.
Nexus Study
Purpose
As development occurs in the City, new backbone infrastructure and capital facilities are required to mitigate the increased demand created by new residents and workers. Revenues from DIFs fund the construction of new backbone infrastructure and capital facilities as well as the related administrative costs through the City’s fee program. The fee program contains separate fee categories for each type of infrastructure and capital facilities. Incorporated in this Nexus Study (Nexus Study, Study or Report) are the following fees:
• Public Facilities
• Traffic Signal
• Traffic Mitigation
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 3 November 2024 City of Santee
• Drainage
• Parks-in-Lieu
• Fire Facilities
• Long Range Planning
• Program Administration
This Report is designed to satisfy the AB1600 Nexus requirements, AB602 requirements, and provide the necessary technical analysis to support the adoption of the updated fees. The fees will be effective 60 days after the City’s final action establishing and authorizing the collection of the fees.
Results
Updated Fees
Pursuant to AB602 guidance, residential development fees are proposed to be assessed on a per square foot basis. To yield consistency across fees assessed on non-residential land uses, nonresidential development fees will be assessed per 1,000 building square foot. The Public Facilities Fee, which funds park and recreation facilities and the Park-in-Lieu, which funds park land acquisition will continue to not be assessed on non-residential development based on the assumption that non-residential development does not generate demand for park facilities. Fees on Accessory Dwelling Units, specialized projects, and rebuild projects are detailed further in Section 12: Implementation and Administration. Table 1-1 shows a summary of the proposed fees.
Table 1-1: Summary of Proposed Development Impact Fees
Proposed Fees Comparison with Existing Fees
Table 1-2 compares the Proposed Fees against the Existing Fees for Residential Land Uses.
Existing residential fees were converted from a fee per dwelling unit to per square foot. Fees for Fire Facilities, General Plan, and Program Administration are new proposed fees so there are no existing fees to compare to.
Land Use
Public
Facilities Traffic Signal
Traffic
Mitigation Drainage Park in-Lieu Fire Facilities
Long Range
Planning Administration (1) Total
Residential
Single Family 5.21$ $ 0.37 $ 2.68 $ 0.35 $ 6.66 $ 1.75 $ 0.08 $ 0.34 17.44$ Multi-Family 5.79$ $ 0.29 $ 2.07 $ 0.43 $ 7.41 $ 1.95 $ 0.09 $ 0.36 18.39$ Non-Residential
Commercial Exempt $ 1,884.95 $ 13,462.20 $ 1,689.92 Exempt 887.29 $ $ 39.84 $ 359.28 18,323.48$ Office Exempt $ 1,040.14 $ 7,428.64 $ 631.53 Exempt 1,950.08 $ $ 87.56 $ 222.76 11,360.71$ Industrial Exempt $ 240.67 $ 1,718.83 $ 1,295.13 Exempt 195.01 $ $ 8.76 $ 69.17 3,527.57$ Notes:
1 An administrative fee (2% of each fee) is collected for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) development impact fee program administration costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analysis. (Fee per Square Foot)
(Fee per 1,000 Building Square Foot)
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 4 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 1-2: Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (Residential)
Table 1-3 compares the Proposed Fees against the Existing Fees for Non-Residential Land Uses.
Office and Commercial land uses experience a large increase (126% and 39% respectively), mainly due to the Traffic Signal and Traffic Mitigation fees. The existing fees collected on these two land uses were abnormally low. Furthermore, the assumptions for non-residential development have changed significantly since the prior fee update, which greatly impacted the analysis.
Single Family Existing Fee (1) Proposed Fee Percentage Change Public Facilities $ 3.81 $ 5.21 37%
Traffic Signal $ 0.22 $ 0.37 68%
Traffic Mitigation $ 2.15 $ 2.68 25%
Drainage (2) $ 2.07 $ 0.35 -83%
Park in-lieu $ 4.59 $ 6.66 45%
Fire Facilities $ - $ 1.75 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 0.08 N/A
Administration $ - $ 0.34 N/A
TOTAL $ 12.84 $ 17.44 36%
Multi Family Existing Fee (1) Proposed Fee Percentage Change Public Facilities $ 4.73 $ 5.79 22%
Traffic Signal $ 0.19 $ 0.29 52%
Traffic Mitigation $ 1.84 $ 2.07 12%
Drainage $ 1.60 $ 0.43 -73%
Park in-lieu $ 5.76 $ 7.41 29%
Fire Facilities $ - $ 1.95 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 0.09 N/A
Administration $ - $ 0.36 N/A
TOTAL $ 14.12 $ 18.39 30%
Notes:
1 2
Ex isting fees w ere conv erted from a fee per dw elling unit to per square foot using the same residential size assumptions in this study to prov ide a more accurate comparison to the new fee structure.
Drainage Fee for ex isting Single Family takes the av erage of Land Uses: HL, R1, R1A, and R2.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 5 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 1-3: Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (Non-Residential)
Program Administration Fee
The City oversees the implementation and administration of the DIF Program, consistent with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act. A two percent (2%) Program Administration Fee is added Commercial Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal $ 1,627.00 $ 1,884.95 16%
Traffic Mitigation $ 10,090.00 $ 13,462.20 33%
Drainage $ 1,507.00 $ 1,689.92 12%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities $ - $ 887.29 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 39.84 N/A
Administration $ - $ 359.28 N/A
TOTAL $ 13,224.00 $ 18,323.48 39%
Office Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal $ 487.00 $ 1,040.14 114%
Traffic Mitigation $ 3,023.00 $ 7,428.64 146%
Drainage $ 1,507.00 $ 631.53 -58%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities $ - $ 1,950.08 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 87.56 N/A
Administration $ - $ 222.76 N/A
TOTAL $ 5,017.00 $ 11,360.71 126%
Industrial Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal $ 204.00 $ 240.67 18%
Traffic Mitigation $ 1,262.00 $ 1,718.83 36%
Drainage $ 1,507.00 $ 1,295.13 -14%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities $ - $ 195.01 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 8.76 N/A
Administration $ - $ 69.17 N/A
TOTAL $ 2,973.00 $ 3,527.57 19%
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 6 November 2024 City of Santee
to fund the costs of the City’s management and ongoing fee program administration, collection, and reporting. This includes costs associated with City staff and consultant time, studies, and administration to support the program. Industry standard ranges from three to six percent (3-6%) of the fee for the administrative component of a development fee program. The administrative functions include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Annual fee adjustments
• Annual fee reporting
• Additional fee reporting every five years
• Posting of nexus studies and fee schedules on the City’s website • Nexus study updates every eight years (an AB602 requirement) • Master Plans necessary to support the Nexus study updates • Staff and consultant time related to fee preparation, collection, tracking, and administration
• Staff and consultant time needed to track credits and reimbursements for improvements constructed in the fee program
In addition to the aforementioned administrative activities, the City is responsible for both (i) using fee revenues to plan for and construct required capital facilities and (ii) pursue other funding sources, as required, to bridge financial gaps between what is collected and the actual cost to construct needed facilities. Furthermore, given the additional fee reporting requirements of AB516, posting of information per AB1483, Nexus Study updates every eight years per AB602, and additional staff time to administer this fee program and the potential for a Master Plan in the future to support a Nexus Study update, a two percent (2%) Program Administration Fee is necessary to fund these additional requirements.
Fee Adjustment Procedures
The DIFs may be adjusted periodically to reflect revised facility requirements, receipt of funding from alternative sources (i.e., State or Federal grants), revised facilities or costs, changes in demographics, changes in the average unit square footage, or changes in the land use plan. In accordance with Santee Municipal Code section 12.30.050, Santee Development Impact Fees are automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year. The inflation adjustment is two percent or based on the previous calendar years increase in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (CPI-U:
All Items) as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, whichever is higher. The City will amend the current municipal code to reflect adjusting the fees annually on July 1st of each year using the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the 20-City Average, as reported by Engineering News Record (ENR), for a twelve-month period or a similar published index if the CCI Index is no longer available.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 7 November 2024 City of Santee
Timing of Fee Payment
Fees will be collected at the time the building permit for the project is issued. All residential projects will pay a fee based on the livable square footage of the residential unit(s). For highdensity residential projects (defined in the General Plan as high-density residential development with multi-family dwellings, including apartments and condominiums), the fees will be due at the time of the building permit for each building. For high-density residential projects with communal space, the non-residential communal portion (i.e., clubhouse, maintenance facility, gym, etc.) will not be assessed impact fees as the impact is assumed to be captured in the residential fees. Areas that are accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be charged impact fees according to use.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 8 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 2 Legal Context and Methodology
Nexus Requirement Summary
AB1600 was enacted by the State of California in 1987 creating the Mitigation Fee Act - Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code. The Mitigation Fee Act requires that all public agencies satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project:
1. Identify the purpose of the fee.
2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified.
3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
5. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
The purpose of this report is to demonstrate that all fee components comply with the Mitigation Fee Act. The assumptions, methodologies, facility standards, costs, and cost allocation factors that were used to establish the nexus between the fees and the development on which the fees will be charged are summarized in subsequent sections of this Report.
AB602
AB602, which was enacted by the State of California in 2021, amended Sections 65940.1 and 66019 of, and added Section 66016.5 to the Government Code. AB602 requires that if a local agency conducts and adopts an impact fee nexus study after January 1, 2022, the local agency shall follow all of the following standards and practices:
1. Before the adoption of an associated development fee, an impact fee nexus study shall be adopted.
2. When applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.
3. A nexus study shall include information that supports the local agency’s actions, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 66001 of the Government Code.
4. If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, the local agency shall review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fees collected under the original fee.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 9 November 2024 City of Santee
5. A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development. A local agency that imposes a fee proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units of the development shall be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. A nexus study is not required to comply with the requirements to calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionally to the square footage of the proposed units if the local agency makes the following findings:
• An explanation as to why square footage is not appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on housing development project.
• An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. • That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments, or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.
6. Large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study.
7. All studies shall be adopted at a public hearing with at least 30 days’ notice, and the local agency shall notify any member of the public that requests notice of intent to begin an impact fee nexus study of the date of the hearing.
8. Studies shall be updated at least every eight years, from the period beginning on January 1, 2022.
9. The local agency may use the impact fee nexus study template developed by the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to Section 50466.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
This report demonstrates that all fee components comply with AB602. An analysis of level of service for each applicable fee component is summarized in subsequent sections of this report. The methodologies performed to calculate the updated fees ensure that the costs for facilities are proportionately spread between existing and future users. Any existing deficiencies were removed and are not charged to new development.
Capital Improvement Plan
AB602 states that large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan (CIP) as part of the nexus study. This report includes the facilities to be adopted as the City’s CIP for the DIF program in Appendix A.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 10 November 2024 City of Santee
Methodology
Imposed fees require various findings to ensure that a reasonable relationship exists between the fee amount and the cost of the facility or portion of the facility attributable to the new development.
Several methodologies are available to determine fee amounts. The most common methodologies are defined by the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley.
Choosing the appropriate methodology depends on the type of facility for which the fee is calculated and the availability of documentation to support the fee calculation. Following is a discussion of the methodologies available to calculate the separate fee components in this report.
Existing Inventory Method
The existing inventory method, also known as the “incremental method” uses a facility standard based on the ratio of existing facilities to the demand on the facilities by the existing service population on a cost per unit or cost per square foot basis. Under this approach, new development funds the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development. By definition, the existing inventory method ensures that no facility deficiencies are spread to future development. This method is often used when a long range plan for new facilities is not available.
Planned Facilities Method
The planned facilities method calculates the proposed fee based on the ratio of planned facilities to the increase in demand associated with new development. This method is appropriate when planned facilities have been defined by a long range master plan or expenditure plan which includes specific facilities and cost estimates. As the Planned Facilities Method relies on a long range master plan that may change as the plan is implemented, fees based on this methodology need to be regularly updated to remain consistent with the project lists and current plans.
System Plan Method
The system plan method utilizes an integrated approach to allocate the cost of existing facilities and the costs of planned facilities to the total development in the study area. This method is appropriate when calculating a systemwide fee in which new development will fund an integrated system of facilities at the future standard attributable to new development. By spreading the costs of an integrated system incorporating the existing facilities and planned facilities costs to the total development in the study area, this ensures that new development only pays their proportional share of the total system costs and is not responsible for rectifying any existing deficiencies.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 11 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 3 Population and Land Use Assumptions
Land Use Types
To ensure a reasonable relationship between each fee and the type of development paying the fee, different land use types must be distinguished. The land use categories used in this analysis are defined below.
• Single Family Residential (SFR): Detached single-family dwelling units. Includes very low density, low density, and age-restricted units. • Multi-Family Residential (MFR): Attached residential projects. • Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU): A second unit, attached or detached from a SFR. • Commercial: All commercial, retail, educational, hotel/motel development, and mixed-use development.
• Office: All general, professional, and medical office development. • Industrial: All manufacturing and warehouse development.
Some developments may include more than one land use type, such as an industrial warehouse with living quarters (a live-work designation) or a planned unit development with both single and multi-family uses. In these cases, the fees will be calculated separately for each land use type.
Growth Forecasts
Growth projections are used as indicators of demand and projected revenue to fund the infrastructure identified in Appendix A. The City’s existing population and Buildout population projections are critical assumptions used throughout the fee sections that follow in this report. The following resources were used as part of this analysis:
• Estimates of total development through Buildout were based on the City’s land use plan from the City’s Housing Element Cycle 2021-2029 and the City’s Planning Department’s land use analysis.
• Population projections were based on the land use projections and the estimated persons per household taken from the US Census American Community Survey. • Existing population estimates are based on the existing land uses and persons per household taken from the US Census American Community Survey. Existing nonresidential worker populations are based on non-residential land use data from the City’s Planning Department and the corresponding employment densities. • Worker projections are based on estimated buildout square footage and the employees per square feet assumption from the USGBC LEED BD+C: New Construction | v4 – Default Occupancy Counts.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 12 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 3-1 identifies the existing and future residential units and non-residential square feet. The land use information is based on the City’s General Plan, City of Santee Housing Element Cycle 2021-2029, and City planning staff. The Office land use is treated as commercial use in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. For purpose of this analysis, 7.6% of Commercial / Office Land growth use is assumed as office space based on current GIS land use office and commercial acres.
Table 3-1: Existing and Future Land Uses
Table 3-2 identifies the existing service population. Non-residential buildings are typically occupied less than dwelling units, so it is reasonable to assume that average per-worker demand for services is less than average per-resident demand. The 0.37-weighting factor for workers is based upon a 45-hour work week (40 hours of work plus 1 hour lunch break) relative to a resident’s non-working time of 123 hours (168 hours per week less 45 work hours).
Table 3-2: Existing Service Population
Land Use Existing Projected Growth (1) Total (Buildout) Residential (Units)
Single Family 13,801 1,444 15,245
Multi Family 7,447 4,466 11,913
Subtotal Residential 21,248 5,910 27,158
Non-Residential (SF) (1)
Commercial 2,309,312 1,020,343 3,329,654
Office 189,943 83,924 273,868
Industrial 2,683,296 1,266,299 3,949,595
Subtotal Non-Residential 5,182,551 2,370,566 7,553,117
Notes
1 Office land use is treated as commercial use in General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. For purpose of this analy sis,
7.6% of Commercial/Office Land grow th use is assumed as office space based on current GIS land use office and commercial acres.
Category Total Persons
Weighting
Factor (3)
Service
Population
Residents (1) 58,086 1.00 58,086
Workers (2) 21,968 0.37 8,128
Total 80,054 66,214
Notes:
1 2
densities (Commercial: 1.82, Office: 4.0, Industrial: 0.4). 3 Based on the ex isting number of units and persons per household assumptions.
Employ ment data based on ex isting non-residential land use and the corresponding employ ment Workers are w eighted at 0.37 based on a 45 hour w ork w eek relativ e to a resident's time of 123 hours (168 hours per w eek less 45 w ork hours).
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 13 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 3-3 shows the estimated service population at Buildout.
Table 3-3: Estimated Service Population at Buildout
Occupant Density
Occupant densities ensure a reasonable relationship between the increase in service population and the amount of the fee. Developers pay the fee based on the square footage of additional housing units or building square feet of non-residential development, so the fee schedule must convert service population estimates to these measurements of project size. This conversion is done using the average occupant density factors by land use type shown in Table 3-4. The residential density factors were derived from the US Census American Community Survey while the non-residential densities were derived from the U.S. Green Building Council Default Occupancy Counts.
Table 3-4: Persons per Household & Employment Density
Category
Total
Existing
Persons
Total Futue
Growth
Total
Persons
Weighting
Factor (3)
Service
Population
Residents (1) 58,086 14,815 72,901 1.00 72,901
Workers (2) 21,968 2,700 24,668 0.37 9,127
Total 80,054 17,515 97,569 82,028
Notes:
1 2
3 Workers are w eighted at 0.37 based on a 45 hour w ork w eek relativ e to a resident's time of 123 hours (168 hours per w eek less 45 w ork hours).
Based on projected grow th in 1,000 SF of non-residential land use and the corresponding employ ment densities (Commercial: 1.82, Office: 4.0, Industrial: 0.4).
Based on projected grow th in units and the resident per unit assumption (2.93 per single family and 2.37 for multi-family ).
Land Use
Residential (1)
Single Family 2.93 Residents per dwelling unit
Multi-Family 2.37 Residents per dwelling unit
Non-Residential (2)
Commercial 1.82 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Office 4.00 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Industrial 0.40 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Notes:
1 2 Non-Residential employ ment density 's deriv ed from the USGBC LEED BD+C: New Construction | v 4 - Default Occupancy Counts.
Residential residents per dw elling unit ex trapolated from American Community Surv ey 2020 5-Year Density Assumptions
Estimates for the City of Santee: Table B25032 & B25033.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 14 November 2024 City of Santee
Average Unit Sizes
To meet AB602 requirement five (5), this Report calculated the average unit size for single family residential and multi-family units based on the estimated average size of planned new development within each land use category in the City. The average unit size is based on the livable square footage of the residential unit for all residential land uses. This Report derived the unit sizes from the City of Santee building permit records.
Basing the average unit size on livable square footage for all residential units is not only consistent with industry standard for fee calculations, it also provides a strong nexus between the impact of the unit and the fee amount. A good example of this industry standard are school fees in California. In California school fees are based on assessable space, which means a quantity equal to the area (expressed in square feet) within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including the carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure or similar structure.
As stated previously, to accurately capture the impact of a residential project on capital facilities for high-density multi-family residential projects with communal spaces, the communal spaces (i.e., clubhouse, maintenance facility, gym, etc.) will not be assessed impact fees as the impact is assumed to be captured in the residential fees. Areas that contain employees and are accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be charged impact fees according to use. The non-residential area accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be based on the useable size of that area. The usable square footage is the actual area of a space as measured within the demising exterior walls of that space. Including areas that contain employees that are accessible by the public captures the additional impact these new facilities will have on the backbone facilities in the City.
Table 3-5 summarizes the estimated average size of planned new development within each residential land use category utilized for this study.
Table 3-5: Residential Land Use Average Unit Size
The City will monitor the average size of housing units in the City based on new developments on an annual basis and if the size of units on average are significantly different than anticipated, the fees will be updated as part of the annual update for the fee adjustment to reflect this change in order to ensure the fee program collects the anticipated level of funding.
Land Use
Average SF
Assumption
Residential (Units) (1)
Single Family 2,200
Multi-Family 1,600
Sources:
1 City of Santee Building Permit records.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 15 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 4 Public Facilities Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the need for additional passive and active park facilities and recreational community buildings to accommodate new development in the City and the fees that are necessary in order to ensure that new development provides adequate funding to meet those needs. This Nexus Study updates the methodology of the existing Public Facilities Fee and recommends updated fees.
The Public Facilities Fee is made up of two components, Park Construction and Recreation Facilities such as community centers. Residential development in the City will pay the Public Facilities Fee at building permit issuance.
For the Park Construction Component, the park cost was estimated based on the existing City adopted standard of five (5) acres of developed parkland per 1,000 residents. The Public Facilities Fee is for facility development cost only and does not include parkland acquisition costs, which is acquired through the Quimby Act which requires developers to either dedicate land to satisfy their parkland requirement or pay an in-lieu fee. Please see Chapter 8 of this study for further detail on the Parks-in-Lieu Fee. The Public Facilities Fee applies only to new residential development.
The Public Facilities Fee also includes the cost of recreation facilities. The Public Facilities Fee recreation component is calculated using the Planned Facilities Methodology taking into account the cost of future recreation facilities.
Service Population
The Public Facilities Fee is not applied to non-residential development because workers typically do not use park and community recreation facilities.
Current Level of Service
Per AB602, when applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. Table 4-1 describes the existing Public Facilities provided by the City using facility information and valuation based upon Property Insurance valuation.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 16 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-1: Existing Public Facilities
Table 4-2 calculates the existing level of service per resident by dividing the total cost of the existing Public Facilities by the existing resident population. The existing level of service exceeds the proposed fee level.
Facility Address Size Cost Per Unit Total Cost
Recreation Centers SF
Santee Teen Center @ Big Rock Park 8125 Arlette St. 1,648 $ 204,387 City Hall - Building 7 10601 - 10629 Magnolia Ave. 6,222 $ 1,333,423 City Hall - Building 8A & 8P 10601 - 10629 Magnolia Ave. 6,222 $ 1,307,487 Subtotal Recreation Centers $ 2,845,297
Recreation Facilities SF
City of Santee Aquatic Center (operated by YMCA) 10123 Riverwalk Drive 25,116 $ 3,621,546 Town Center Community Park, Sports Complex
(operated by Sportsplex USA) 9951 Riverwalk Drive 7,527 $ 3,320,484 Subtotal Recreation Facilities $ 6,942,030
Park Facilities Acre
Big Rock Park 8125 Arlette St. 5.00 $ 725,000 $ 3,625,000 Deputy Ken Collier Park 9206 Via De Cristina 0.51 $ 725,000 $ 369,750 Mast Park 9125 Carlton Hills Blvd. 61.16 $ 725,000 $ 44,341,000 Mast Park West Trail 9200 Carlton Hiulls Blvd. 43.26 $ 725,000 $ 31,363,500 Shadow Hill Park 9161 Shadow Hill Rd. 5.69 $ 725,000 $ 4,125,250 Sky Ranch Park 5850 Cala Lily St. 1.36 $ 725,000 $ 986,000 Town Center Park - East 550 Park Center Dr. 55.00 $ 725,000 $ 39,875,000 Town Center Park - West 9545 Cuyamaca St. 10.20 $ 725,000 $ 7,395,000 Walker Preserve 9500 Magnolia Ave 105.08 $ 725,000 $ 76,183,000 West Hills Park 8790 Mast Blvd. 8.41 $ 725,000 $ 6,097,250 Woodglen Vista Park 10250 Woodglen Vista Dr. 15.00 $ 725,000 $ 10,875,000 Weston Park 9050 Trailmark Way 4.47 $ 725,000 $ 3,240,750 Subtotal Park Facilities $ 228,476,500
Total Facilities $ 238,263,827
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 17 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-2: Existing Level of Service per Resident
Planned Level of Service
The City has established a goal for parks at five (5) acres of developed public parkland per 1,000 residents, per the General Plan and Parks and Recreation Master Plan. This analysis is based on the existing City standard of five (5) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, where new development will contribute and develop five (5) acres of developed public parkland per 1,000 residents. New development will be required to meet the standard of five (5) acres of developed public parkland per 1,000 residents with this fee. Applying the General Plan standard to new development is consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act, as outlined in Government Code Section 66001, “A fee shall not include the costs attributable to existing deficiencies in public facilities, but may include the costs attributable to the increased demand for public facilities reasonably related to the development project in order to (1) refurbish existing facilities to maintain the existing level of service or (2) achieve an adopted level of service that is consistent with the general plan”.
As detailed in Table 4-3, the existing level of service is identified and exceeds this City Standard.
In compliance with Government Code Section 66001, the City Standard is utilized for the Park Facilities Fee as it is a City Standard set by the adopted General Plan. New development is expected to pay the fee that results in meeting the City Standard and will not be used to fund existing deficiencies.
The recreation component is new developments’ fair share of planned recreation facilities in the City.
Description Value
Existing Facilities
Recreation Centers $ 2,845,297
Recreation Facilities $ 6,942,030
Park Facilities(1) $ 228,476,500
Subtotal Facilities $ 238,263,827
Soft Costs (2) $ 95,305,531
Existing Fund Balance $ 8,921,073
Total Costs $ 342,490,431
Existing Service Population (3)
58,086
Total Existing Level of Service per Resident $ 5,896.26 Notes:
1 2
3 Ex isting Facilities v alues deriv ed from insurance v aluation of ex isting Recreation buildings and Park Facilities Costs v alued at $725,000/acre.
Soft Costs include: 10% - Construction Contingency , 15% - Design/Env ironmental, and 15% - Construction Admin/Inspection.
Ex isting Serv ice population comprises of City resident population and w orker population (w eighted at 0.37 based on a 45 hour w ork w eek).
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 18 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-3: Existing Level of Service for Parkland
Fee Methodology
The Public Facilities Fee is calculated using the Planned Facilities Methodology taking into account the future recreation facilities and the General Plan Standard taking into account City established park acreage standard new development contributes towards. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, the Planned Facility Method “Estimates the costs for future facilities needed to serve new development based on a long range expenditure plan for these future facility costs.” This method is appropriate when planned facilities are mostly for the benefit of new development. Per the “Impact Fee Nexus Template”, the Planned Facilities Methodology estimates the costs for future facilities needed to serve new development based on a long range expenditure plan for these future facility costs. This should include identifying what types of public facilities will be needed in the future to serve new development and their associated costs, which may include refurbishment of existing facilities to maintain the existing level of service or achieving an adopted level of service that is consistent with the General Plan.
The park facilities component uses the Planned Facility Methodology based on the General Plan Standard methodology for calculating the fee. The fees are based on the future developed public parkland needed to maintain the adopted General Plan standard of five (5) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents.
Table 4-4 calculates new developments fair share of recreation facilities based on new future residents as a percentage of the total residents at Buildout.
Description Acres
Existing Parkland (1)
Park Acreages 315.14
Existing Service Population (2)
58,086
Total Existing Level of Service per Resident 5.43
Notes:
1 2
Ex isting parkland data from the City of Santee.
Ex isting Serv ice population comprises of just residents and does not factor in non-residential.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 19 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-4: Population Allocation for Recreation Facilities Table 4-5 calculates the Recreation Cost per resident by summing up future planned facilities costs attributable to the fee program, allocates the cost to new development based on population, and divides by the future service population. Planned Recreation Facilities were sourced from the City of Santee’s AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report (2023).
Table 4-5 shows the percent attributable to new development.
Table 4-5: Planned New Public Facilities
Table 4-6 calculates the Park Facilities cost per resident by dividing the cost of park construction per acre by the City standard of 5.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Fee revenues may be used to construct park improvements and facilities on land dedicated by developers in accordance with the City’s Quimby Ordinance or though land purchased through the payment of the proposed Parks-in-Lieu Fee (see Chapter 8).
Description Value
Population
Existing Service Population (Residents) 58,086
Total Buildout Service Population (Residents) 72,901
Net Future Population 14,815
Population Allocation
Existing Service Population 80%
Future Additional Population 20%
Total Population 100%
Description Construction Cost Size (SF)
Attributable to
Fee Program3
Cost Attributable to
Fee Program
Recreation Facilities
Santee Community Center (1) $ 21,000,000 12,500 20% $ 4,200,000 Total Recreation Facilities Cost $ 4,200,000
Future Service Population (2)
14,815
Recreation Cost per Resident $ 283.50
Notes:
1 2
3 Costs attributable to the fee program are based on population grow th.
Other funding sources for this community center, including ex isting fund balance, are show n in the adopted Santee CIP 2024.
Future Serv ice Population does not include w orkers.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 20 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-6: Park Facilities Construction Costs per Resident Table 4-7 identifies the public facilities cost per capita by taking the future cost of public facilities improvements and dividing by the future service population.
Table 4-7: Public Facility Cost per Resident
Fee Summary
The Public Facilities Fee per unit is calculated by multiplying the cost per capita by the average number of residents per unit type (density). The fee per unit must then be converted to a fee per square foot by taking the total fee per unit and dividing by the estimated average unit size for each land use to arrive at the fee per square foot. These calculations are shown in Table 4-8.
Table 4-8: Public Facilities Fee Cost Summary
Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections
Based upon the projected new population growth, new development will contribute roughly 74 acres to the City’s park system. Given the nature of new development and the fact that neighborhood parks are typically built and dedicated by the developer, the exact identification of future parks are difficult to predict.
Park Construction
Park Construction Cost per Acre (1) $ 725,000
Required Acres/1,000 Residents (2) 5.0
Park Facilities Cost per Resident $ 3,625.00
Notes:
1 2
Park Construction Cost per acre estimated based on last City Neighborhood park construction cost (Weston Park).
The City 's Parks and Recreation Master Plan set's the City 's standard of public parkland at 5 acres for ev ery 1,000 people.
Public Facilities Cost per Resident
Recreation Cost per Resident $ 283.50
Park Facilities Cost per Resident $ 3,625.00
Total Cost per Resident $ 3,908.50
Land Use Cost Per Resident Density Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family $ 3,908.50 2.93 11,451.91 $ 2,200 5.21$
Multi Family $ 3,908.50 2.37 9,263.15 $ 1,600 5.79$
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 21 November 2024 City of Santee
Santee Municipal Code (SMC) Chapter 12.40, Park Lands Dedication establishes the provisions for dedication of land, payment of in-lieu fee or a combination of both for the purpose of providing park and recreation facilities to serve future residents of a subdivision development. In most cases, developers build new neighborhood parks on behalf of the City as a condition of residential subdivision construction and to fulfill their Quimby park acreage dedication requirements.
Developer-built parks can often be delivered faster than City-built park projects due to economies of scale as developers are already building within their subdivisions and the constraint in City staff resources. Developers who build and dedicate parks, will be given credits against their park component of the Public Facilities Fee. Due to this requirement, it is not possible nor necessary to include a CIP list for neighborhood parks. Should the park construction component of the Public Facilities Fee be collected, the City will allocate these to new parks through the City’s CIP process.
As for Community Parks, developers typically pay the fee instead of building the community park due to the large size and advanced planning community parks require, however in some cases community parks are built by developers. The Fanita Ranch Specific Plan includes 31.2 acres for a community park, which includes 19.7 active acres and 11.5 passive community park. Per the public park credit provisions set forth in City’s Municipal Code Section 12.40.110, developed park land dedicated to and maintained by the City of Santee will receive up to 100 percent park credit.
Developed park land maintained by an HOA and trail systems will receive up to 50 percent credit per the private park credit provisions in SMC Section 12.40.100. Per the Fanita Ranch Specific Plan, the developer plans to dedicate this land. The Community Park is included in the CIP, which is Table A-1 in Appendix A.
Table 4-9 summarizes the anticipated Public Facilities Fee revenue. The revenue will be available to expand the City’s Park and Recreation facilities to meet the needs of new residents. Based on the population estimates in this Nexus Study and using the City General Plan standard of 5 acres per 1,000 residents, it is anticipated that approximately 74.08 additional acres of parks facilities are needed to meet the needs of the City, plus recreation facilities, at Buildout at a cost of approximately $58 million.
Table 4-9: Public Facilities Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
SF
Assumptions
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (units)
Single Family 5.21$ 1,444 2,200 16,551,128 $
Multi Family 5.79$ 4,466 1,600 41,373,024 $
Total $ 57,924,152
Notes:
1 The proposed fee does not include the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 22 November 2024 City of Santee
Nexus Requirement Summary
The Public Facilities Fee component of the DIF program meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.
Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Public Facilities Fee is to fund the park and recreation facility needs generated by new development in the City. Each new resident creates a demand for additional park and recreation facilities. The City’s adopted standard is to provide 5 acres of parkland for each 1,000 residents. In order to accommodate these needs, new park facilities will be built and/or existing park facilities will be expanded. The City has planned future recreation facilities and each new resident creates a demand for additional recreation facilities. In order to accommodate these needs, new recreation facilities will be built or existing recreation facilities will be expanded. Table 4-6 and Table 4-7 calculate the parks and recreation cost per capita based on the City standard for parks and the estimated construction cost and planned recreation facilities.
Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.
The Public Facilities Fee will be used to fund new park and recreation development in order to meet the City’s General Plan and Parks and Recreation Master Plan standards discussed in this chapter. Park expansion is necessary to meet the City’s adopted standards of five acres of parkland for each 1,000 new residents. In most cases, developers build new neighborhood parks on behalf of the City as a condition of residential subdivision construction and to fulfill their Quimby park acreage dedication requirements. The location of the neighborhood parks will be determined based on the location of the new development project, as they are typically located within each development. The recreation component of the fee will be used to fund new or expand existing recreation facilities, such as the planned Community Center. The City has 31.2 acres of community park planned in Fanita Ranch, and it is anticipated that the developer will dedicate this acreage for the City to develop. As future developments come online and the Public Facilities Fee is collected, the City will identify future community park sites to program the remaining acres. The anticipated fee revenue to fund these facilities at Buildout is shown on Table 4-9.
Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The fee will be used to fund new parks and recreation facilities that are necessary to serve the increased residents in the City. New residential development generates additional residents which increases the demand for park and recreation facilities. The Public Facilities Fee is calculated using the City’s General Plan standard of five (5) acres of park per 1,000 residents and planned recreation facilities. Residential development is responsible for paying its fair share to meet the City’s standard and the cost of recreation facilities attributable to new development. Non-residential uses do not pay the fee since they do not generate additional residents and workers have minimal impact on the City’s park and recreation system.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 23 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-6 and Table 4-7 calculate the cost per capita and then allocates the cost to each development type based on the estimated persons per household. Table 4-8 then calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size. By basing the fee on the size of the unit and the estimated number of new residents that is anticipated to be generated by the addition of that square footage, the fee is directly correlated to the increased need for new parks.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new residential development is anticipated to generate new residents. The addition of new residents creates the need for new parks and recreation facilities to meet the City’s General Plan park standard of five (5) acres per 1,000 residents and planned recreation facilities. The fee is directly correlated to the number of new residents expected to be generated by each type of development. Non-residential development does not pay for parks as non-residential developments do not generate a significant demand for park and recreation facilities. Residential development pays its fair share based on the estimated persons the new unit is expected to generate.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
As new residential units are constructed, new park facilities are necessary to meet the City’s General Plan standard of 5 acres of park per 1,000 residents. New recreation facilities are necessary based on new developments fair share of the planned facilities. The Public Facilities Fee is calculated by totaling the Recreation (Table 4-6) and Park Facilities (Table 4-7) costs per resident.
The cost per capita is then allocated to each residential land use based on the persons per household each unit is expected to generate and divided by the average unit size in square feet to determine the fee per square foot as shown in Table 4-8. Since the need for park and recreation facilities is based on the number of new residents, calculating the fee based on the number of persons each unit is expected to generate and converting to a fee per square feet, ensures that each new residential unit is paying only its fair share of the required facilities.
By determining the fee based on the estimated new residents that would be generated by new development, each new residential unit is paying only its fair share of the facilities required. Nonresidential land uses are not assessed a Public Facilities Fee as non-residential development will not generate an increase in park and recreation facility demand.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 24 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 5 Traffic Signal Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the City’s Traffic Signal Fee. The proposed Citywide Traffic Signal Fee covers the costs of maintaining existing traffic signals and construction of new traffic signals to meet the needs of new development. The Traffic Signal Fee uses the System Plan Method to calculate the fee. The System Plan Method utilizes an integrated approach to allocate the cost of existing facilities and the costs of planned facilities to the total development in the study area.
As shown in Table 5-1, the future traffic signal facilities costs were developed by the City based on facilities necessary to serve new development.
Table 5-1: Traffic Signal Facilities – Planned Facilities Facility/Project Major Street Minor Street Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Traffic Signal Phases
New Signal - 6 Phase Signal Magnolia Ave Princess Joann Rd 6 415,000 415,000.00 $ New Signal - 6 Phase Signal Cottonwood Ave Riverview Pkwy 6 415,000 415,000.00 $ New Signal - 8 Phase Signal Woodside Ave Mission Del Magnolia / Riderwood Terrace 8 450,000 450,000.00 $ New Signal - 8 Phase Signal Mission Gorge Rd Marrokal Ln 6 415,000 415,000.00 $ New Pedestrian Signal - Hawk Mission Gorge Rd Forester Creek n/a 220,000 220,000.00 $ New Pedestrian Signal - Hawk Cuyamaca St South River Trail n/a 220,000 220,000.00 $ New Pedestrian Signal - Hawk Prospect Ave Forester Creek n/a 220,000 220,000.00 $ Subtotal Traffic Signal $ 2,355,000.00
Traffic Signal Modifications QTY
Update/replace traffic signal cabinet and controllers Various - 4 49,000$ $ 196,000.00 Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades Various - 11 9,800$ $ 107,800.00 Audible Pedestrian Signal Button Installation Various - 28 14,000$ $ 392,000.00 Smart Signals and Controller/Detection Upgrades Various Arterials - 21 80,000$ $ 1,680,000.00 Signal Modification Carlton Oaks Dr Wethersfield Rd n/a $ 439,000.00 Signal Modification Mast Blvd Carlton Hills Blvd n/a $ 203,900.00 Subtotal Traffic Signal Modifications $ 3,018,700.00
Communications QTY
Install new fiberoptic communication Magnolia Ave Park Center to Riverview Pkwy 2,000 108$ $ 56,000.00 Install new fiberoptic communication Mission Gorge Rd Fanita to Father Junipero 10,500 108$ $ 504,000.00 Subtotal Communications $ 560,000.00
Total Traffic Signal Facilities Costs(1) $ 5,933,700.00 1 Item costs include markup for design (15%), construction admin (15%), Contingency (10%).
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 25 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 5-2 describes the existing Traffic Signal Facilities provided by the City using facility information and valuation based upon Property Insurance valuation.
Table 5-2: Existing Traffic Signal Facilities (page 1 of 2) Facility Major Street Minor Street Unit Total Cost
Traffic Signal Phases
Traffic Signal City ID #1 Mast Boulevard West Hills High School 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #2 Mast Boulevard Weston Drive 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #3 Mast Boulevard Medina Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #4 Mast Boulevard Pebble Beach Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #5 Mast Boulevard Fanita Parkway 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #6 Mast Boulevard Carlton Hills Boulevard 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #7 Mast Boulevard Halberns Boulevard 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #8 Mast Boulevard Cuyamaca Street 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #9 Mast Boulevard Bilteer Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #10 Mast Boulevard Park Center Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #11 Mast Boulevard Magnolia Avenue 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #12 Mission Gorge Road Father Junipero Serra Trail 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #13 Mission Gorge Road West Hills Parkway 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #14 Mission Gorge Road Rancho Fanita Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #15 Mission Gorge Road Big Rock Road 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #16 Mission Gorge Road Mesa Road 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #17 Mission Gorge Road Fanita Drive 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #18 Mission Gorge Road Carlton Hills Boulevard 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #19 Mission Gorge Road Marketplace / Kohls 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #20 Mission Gorge Road Post Office / Lowes 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #21 Mission Gorge Road Town Center Parkway / Olive Lane 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #22 Mission Gorge Road Cuyamaca Street 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #23 Mission Gorge Road Mission Greens Road 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #24 Mission Gorge Road Riverview Parkway / Tamberly Way 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #25 Mission Gorge Road Cottonwood Avenue 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #26 Mission Gorge Road Edgemoor Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #27 Mission Gorge Road Magnolia Avenue / Woodside Avenue 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #28 Cuyamaca Street Prospect Avenue 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #29 Cuyamaca Street Buena Vista Avenue 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #30 Cuyamaca Street Trolley Square 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #31 Cuyamaca Street Town Center Parkway 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #32 Cuyamaca Street Riverpark Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #33 Cuyamaca Street Riverwalk Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #34 Magnolia Avenue Prospect Avenue 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #35 Magnolia Avenue Alexander Way 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #36 Magnolia Avenue Rockvill Street 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #37 Magnolia Avenue Riverview Parkway / New Frontier 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #38 Magnolia Avenue Park Center Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #39 Magnolia Avenue Braverman Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #40 Magnolia Avenue Carefree Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #41 Magnolia Avenue 2nd Street 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #42 Magnolia Avenue El Nopal 8 $ 410,000.00 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 26 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 5-2: Existing Traffic Signal Facilities (page 2 of 2) Trips
To calculate the Traffic Signal Fee and the Traffic Mitigation Fee, this study uses Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) common Trip Generation Rates sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition as the base for trip generation assumptions. It is based on the average daily trips which means the total of all one-direction vehicle movements with either the origin or destination inside the study site that includes existing, primary, pass by, and diverted linked trips and is calculated in accordance with the procedures contained in Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition published by the ITE. For the Traffic Signal Fee, these assumptions are used to calculate the total cost per capita. For the Traffic Mitigation Fee, these assumptions are also used to calculate the proportion of planned facilities that are attributable to new development.
Table 5-3 identifies the Trip Rates per land use. The trip rates are multiplied against the land uses from Table 3-1 in Section 3 to calculate the vehicle trips.
Facility Major Street Minor Street Unit Total Cost
Traffic Signal Phases
Traffic Signal City ID #43 Magnolia Avenue Woodglen Vista / Len Street 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #44 Prospect Avenue Fanita Drive 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #45 Prospect Avenue Ellsworth Lane 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #46 Prospect Avenue Atlas View Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #47 Prospect Avenue Olive Lane 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #48 Prospect Avenue Cottonwood Avenue 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #49 Prospect Avenue Graves Avenue 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #50 Carlton Hills Boulevard Willowgrove Avenue 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #51 Carlton Hills Boulevard Carlton Oaks Drive 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #52 Carlton Hills Boulevard Stoyer Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #53 Carlton Oaks Drive Fanita Parkway 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #54 Carlton Oaks Drive Pebble Beach Drive 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #55 Carlton Oaks Drive Wethersfield Road 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #56 Town Center Parkway Costco / Walmart 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #57 Town Center Parkway Buffalo Wild Wings 6 $ 375,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #58 Town Center Parkway Riverview Parkway 8 $ 410,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #59 Post Office Lowes 4 $ 345,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #60 Trolley Square South 4 $ 345,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #61 Trolley Square North 4 $ 345,000.00 Traffic Signal City ID #62 Woodside Avenue Davidann Road 6 $ 375,000.00 Subtotal Traffic Signal $ 24,105,000.00
Communications LF
Interconnect Citywide Citywide 74,500 10,430,000.00 $
Wireless Citywide Citywide 12 $ 46,800.00
Subtotal Communications $ 10,476,800.00
Total Facilities $ 34,581,800.00
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 27 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 5-3: Trip Rates per Land Use
To calculate the Existing Trips per land use (as shown in Table 5-4), existing residential units and existing non-residential building square footage (per 1,000 SF) is multiplied by the Trips per Unit or Trips per 1,000 square feet assumptions respectively from Table 5-3.
Table 5-4: Existing Vehicle Trips
Land Use Unit
Trip
Generation
Rate
Residential
Single Family Per Dwelling Unit 10.00
Multi Family(1) Per Dwelling Unit 5.64
Non-Residential
Commercial(2) Per 1,000 Building SF 22.87
Office Per 1,000 Building SF 12.62
Industrial(3)
Per 1,000 Building SF 2.92
Notes:
1 2
3 Trip Generation for Multi-Family uses the av erage of the trip generation assumption for multifamily low -rise and mid-rise housing.
ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (shop center and strip retail plaza).
Industrial assumption is the av erage of general light industrial, industrial park, manufacturing, and w arehousing.
Land Use
Existing
Units / SF
Trips per
Unit /
1,000 Bldg. SF
Total Trips
(Rounded)
Residential Units per Unit
Single Family 13,801 10.00 138,010
Multi Family 7,447 5.64 42,001
Non-Residential 1,000 Building SF per 1,000 Building SF Commercial1
2,309 22.87 52,807
Office 190 12.62 2,398
Industrial 2,683 2.92 7,834
Total 243,050
Notes:
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (strip commercial).
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 28 November 2024 City of Santee
To calculate the New Trips per land use (as shown in Table 5-5), projected new residential units and projected new non-residential building square footage (per 1,000 SF) is multiplied by the Trips per Unit or Trips per 1,000 square feet assumptions respectively from Table 5-3.
Table 5-5: New Vehicle Trips
Table 5-6 calculates the buildout trips using the buildout land uses multiplied by the Trips per Unit or Trips per 1,000 square feet assumptions respectively from Table 5-3.
Table 5-6: Total Vehicle Trips
Land Use
Additional
Units / SF
Trips per
Unit /
1,000 Bldg. SF
Total Trips
(Rounded)
Residential Units per Unit
Single Family 1,444 10.00 14,440
Multi Family 4,466 5.64 25,188
Non-Residential 1,000 Building SF per 1,000 Building SF Commercial1
1,020 22.87 23,327
Office 84 12.62 1,060
Industrial 1,266 2.92 3,697
Total 67,712
Notes:
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (strip commercial).
Land Use
Total
Units / SF
Trips per
Unit /
1,000 Bldg. SF
Total Trips
(Rounded)
Residential Units per Unit
Single Family 15,245 10.00 152,450
Multi Family 11,913 5.64 67,189
Non-Residential 1,000 Building SF per 1,000 Building SF Commercial1
3,329 22.87 76,134
Office 274 12.62 3,458
Industrial 3,949 2.92 11,531
Total 310,762
Notes:
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (strip commercial).
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 29 November 2024 City of Santee
Service Population
Demand for traffic signal facilities is based on the total trips generated at Buildout conditions. The Traffic Signal Fee utilizes the land use trip generation assumptions presented in Table 5-6 for the various residential and non-residential land uses based on Institute of Transportation Engineers common Trip Generation Rates (average daily trips) sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition.
Cost Summary
The Traffic Signal Fee will fund the expansion and construction of new traffic signal facilities necessary to serve new growth. These facilities will be necessary to meet the demands of the growth of the City at Buildout. The cost for the Traffic Signal Fee is based on the integrated cost of the current and future facilities. As new development occurs, there are additional trips associated with the new development, which correlates to a need for additional traffic signal improvements.
The Nexus Study acknowledges that the existing development will also benefit from these transportation improvements once they are constructed and therefore existing development has a fair share of these improvements. New development also benefits from the existing network of traffic signals and improvements and therefore new development will fund the integrated system of facilities at the existing standard attributable to new development.
The City will review the potential funding sources for traffic signal projects to determine the appropriate funding mechanisms as projects move forward as well as identify funding sources through the CIP process and identify action plans in updates to the City's Strategic Plan. It is important for new development to fund their fair share of their impact on transportation facilities.
Fee Methodology
The Traffic Signal Fee uses the System Plan Method to calculate the fee. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, the System Plan Method utilizes an integrated approach to allocate the cost of existing facilities and the costs of planned facilities to the total development in the study area. This method is appropriate when calculating a systemwide fee in which new development will fund an integrated system of facilities at the future standard attributable to new development. By spreading the costs of an integrated system incorporating the existing facilities and planned facilities costs to the total development in the study area, this ensures that new development only pays their proportional share of the total system costs and is not responsible for rectifying any existing deficiencies.
The Traffic Signal Fee is calculated based on the cost per trip generated by existing and new development. The total cost of the facilities identified in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2 is spread over the anticipated total number of trips at buildout (existing and generated by future development), as shown in Table 5-6, to calculate the cost per trip. The cost per trip is calculated by taking the total cost of traffic signal facilities, calculating the existing trips and future additional trips, dividing the total cost by the total trips to derive at a cost per trip. This calculation is shown in Table 5-7.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 30 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 5-7: Traffic Signal Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip The Traffic Signal Fee calculated on Table 5-7 is the maximum justifiable fee using the System Plan method, but Table 5-8 shows the fee calculation for the fee used in this analysis based on the facilities necessary to serve new development. The Traffic Signal Fee used in this analysis is calculated based on the cost per trip generated by new development. The total cost of the facilities identified in Table 5-1 is spread over the anticipated total number of trips at buildout (generated by future development), as shown in Table 5-5, to calculate the cost per trip. This calculation is shown in Table 5-8.
Value
Existing Facilities (1)
Traffic Signal $ 24,105,000
Communications $ 10,476,800
Subtotal Existing Facilities 34,581,800 $
Soft Costs (2) $ 13,832,720
Existing Fund Balance $ 353,190
Total Existing Costs $ 48,767,710
New Facilities (3)
Traffic Signal $ 2,355,000
Traffic Signal Modifications $ 3,018,700
Communications $ 560,000
Subtotal New Facilities $ 5,933,700
Soft Costs (2) -$
Total New Costs $ 5,933,700
Total Traffic Signal Cost $ 54,701,410
Total Buildout Trip Generation (4)
310,762
Cost per Trip $ 176.02
Notes:
v alue of ex isting facilities.
and 15% - Construction Admin/Inspection.
3 Based on new facilities prov ided by the City .
land use assumptions.
1 Ex isting Facilities v alues deriv ed from City Engineer cost estimate of replacement 2 Soft Costs include 10% - Construction Contingency , 15% - Design and Env ironmental, 4 Total Trip Generation deriv ed using ex isting residential units and non-residential Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 31 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 5-8: Traffic Signal Existing Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip Fee Summary
The Traffic Signal Fee for new development is calculated by multiplying the cost per trip identified in Table 5-8 by trip generation rate for each land use. The residential fee per unit is converted to a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per unit by the unit size estimated in Table 3-5. Table 5-9 shows the proposed new Traffic Signal Fees for new development.
Table 5-9: Traffic Signal Fee Summary
Reduced Traffic Fee
Residential developments near transit stations generate fewer trips than traditional land use configurations that rely on vehicles as the primary mode of transportation. According to various transportation studies, measurable trip reductions result for projects that are near transit stations and where there are a diversity of land uses that promote connectivity and walkability. To account for the reduced trip rates generated by projects meeting the above characteristics, an additional trip adjustment factor is applied to new residential land uses meeting the following criteria:
Cost per Trip
Traffic Signal Facilities $ 5,933,700.00
Less Fund Balance (1) $ (353,190.00)
Total Traffic Signal Facilities 5,580,510.00 $
Additional Trip Generation $ 67,712
Cost per Trip $ 82.42
Notes:
1 Fund Balance as of 06/30/2024 and prov ided by the City 's Finance Department.
Land Use Cost Per Trip Trip Generation (1) Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family $ 82.42 10.00 $ 824.20 2,200 0.37$
Multi Family $ 82.42 5.64 $ 464.85 1,600 0.29$
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF)
Commercial (2) $ 82.42 22.87 $ 1,884.95
Office $ 82.42 12.62 $ 1,040.14
Industrial $ 82.42 2.92 $ 240.67
Notes:
1 Institute of Transportation Engineers common Trip Generation Rates (PM Trip Rate) sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. 2 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 32 November 2024 City of Santee
1. The housing development is located within one-half mile of a transit station and there is direct access between the project and the transit station along a barrier-free walkable pathway not exceeding one-half mile in length.
2. Convenience retail uses, including a store that sells food, are located within one-half mile of the housing development.
3. The housing development provides either the minimum number of parking spaces required by the local ordinance, or for residential units, no more than one onsite parking space for zero to two bedroom units, and two onsite parking spaces for three or more bedroom units, whichever is less.
For purposes of this reduction, the definition of transit station shall be defined by California Government Code Section 65460.1, “Transit station” means a rail or light-rail station, ferry terminal, bus hub, or bus transfer station. Also, a “housing development” shall be defined by California Government Code Section 66005.1, which is a development project with common ownership and financing consisting of residential use or mixed use where not less than 50 percent of the floorspace is for residential use.
Commercial trips often coincide with other trips (i.e., Person A stops by the store on their way home from work, Person B stops by a restaurant after grocery shopping, etc.) This “pass-by” trip reduction amount is factored into the Commercial trip generation estimates (Table 5-3) as well as the fee for commercial land use in Table 5-9.
Revenue Projections
Table 5-10 summarizes the anticipated Traffic Signal Fee revenue collected at Buildout. The revenue will be used to fund the traffic signal facilities shown on Table 5-1.
Table 5-10: Anticipated Traffic Signal Fee Collection at Buildout Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
SF
Assumptions
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (Units) (SF)
Single Family $ 0.37 1,444 2,200 $ 1,175,416
Multi Family $ 0.29 4,466 1,600 $ 2,072,224
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Commercial $ 1,884.95 1,020.34 $ 1,923,290
Office $ 1,040.14 83.92 $ 87,289
Industrial $ 240.67 1,266.30 $ 304,760
Total $ 5,562,979
Notes:
1 The proposed fee does not include the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding. Rounded to nearest dollar.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 33 November 2024 City of Santee
Current Level of Service
Per AB602, when applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each traffic signal facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. As shown on Table 5-11, the proposed Traffic Signal Fee is less than the existing level of service.
Table 5-11: Existing Level of Service per Vehicle Trip
Nexus Requirement Summary
The proposed Traffic Signal Fee meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.
Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Traffic Signal Fee is to fund planned traffic signal facilities included in Table 5-1 to serve future development. In order to accommodate this need, new facilities must be built and/or existing facilities expanded.
Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.
The fee will be used to fund the planned traffic signal facilities identified in Table 5-1 that are necessary to serve increased demand. The City identified these future projects as the facilities that are required to mitigate the impact of new development in the City.
Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The Traffic Signal Fee will be used to fund the new traffic signal facilities and improvements that are necessary to serve the increase in transportation demand due to new development. The cost of Description Value
Existing Facilities (1)
Traffic Signal $ 24,105,000
Communications $ 10,476,800
Subtotal Facilities $ 34,581,800
Soft Costs (2) $ 13,832,720
Existing Fund Balance $ 353,190
Total Costs $ 48,767,710
Existing Trip Generation (3)
243,050
Cost per Trip $ 200.65
Notes:
1 2
3 Ex isting Facilities v alues deriv ed from City Engineer cost estimate of replacement v alue of ex isting facilities.
Soft Costs include 10% - Construction Contingency , 15% - Design and Env ironmental, and 15% - Construction Ex isting Trip Generation deriv ed using ex isting residential units and non-residential land use assumptions.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 34 November 2024 City of Santee
the improvements is spread to each land use based on the number of trips generated by each land use. This correlation to trips ensures that each new development pays their fair share of the transportation costs.
The cost per trip calculations is shown in Table 5-8. The fee calculation is shown in Table 5-9.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new residential and non-residential development within the City will generate additional trips that incrementally adds to the need for new traffic infrastructure and facilities to serve the increased residents and businesses within the City and ensure that traffic facilities can accommodate the increased demand. These facilities are provided by the City. Each new residential and nonresidential development pays an impact fee based on the additional trips that is expected to be generated by the new development. To accommodate these additional trips, new traffic signal improvements will be needed city-wide. Utilizing trips generated by each development ensures that each type of development pays their fair share of the required new traffic signal facilities. This calculation is shown in Table 5-9.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
The Traffic Signal fee is based on the System Plan Method, which estimates the costs for an integrated system of existing and future facilities. The traffic signal facilities that are necessary for the new development are summarized in the planned improvements presented in Table 5-1. The existing traffic signal facilities are shown on Table 5-2. Each land use pays their fair share of costs based on the number of trips generated by that land use as shown in Table 5-7. The Traffic Signal Fee is calculated based on the cost per trip generated by existing and new development divided by the Buildout service population. The total cost of the facilities identified in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2 is spread over the anticipated total number of trips at buildout (existing and generated by future development), as shown in Table 5-6, to calculate the cost per trip. Utilizing trips ensures that each development pays their fair share of the cost.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 35 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 6 Traffic Mitigation Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the City’s Traffic Mitigation Fee. The proposed Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee covers the construction of new traffic facilities to meet the needs of new development.
As shown in Table 6-1, the future traffic mitigation facilities were developed by the City of Santee based on facilities necessary to serve new development. Facilities are based on the adopted FY 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Program Budget. The City does not anticipate any future major Traffic Mitigation improvements beyond the facilities identified in the CIP. If the City does determine future Traffic Mitigation improvements need to be added to the fee program, the fee would need to be updated.
Table 6-1: Traffic Mitigation Facilities – Planned Facilities Facility Description Total Project Cost
Percent Attributable to
New Development (1) Fee Program Cost
Traffic Mitigation Facility
Cottonwood Avenue River Crossing(2)
Extend Cottonwood Avenue from Riverview Parkway to northern end of Cottonwood Avenue $ 20,786,000 100% $ 20,786,000
Cottonwood Avenue Widening and Sidewalk Improvements
Widen Cottonwood Avenue and install street improvements between Mission Gorge Road and Prospect Avenue $ 12,130,000 21.79% $ 2,643,008 Graves Avenue Street Improvements Widen Graves Avenue from Pepper Drive to Prospect Avenue $ 7,544,000 21.79% $ 1,643,764 Magnolia Avenue Widening
Widen the west side of Magnolia Avenue from the San Diego River to Park Avenue $ 21.79% 1,042,823 4,786,000 $
Median Modification - Mission Gorge Road at Marketplace Realign center median on Mission Gorge Road at Marketplace and Post office to accommodate existing traffic volumes on Mission Gorge Road. $ 21.79% 122,019 560,000 $ Olive Lane Improvements
Widen Olive Land from the Forester Creek Bridge to Mission Gorge Road and install street improvements. $ 21.79% 620,987 2,850,000 $ Prospect Avenue Improvements - West
Widen Prospect Avenue from Mesa Road to Fanita Drive. Install street improvements and purchase right-of-way. $ 21,267,000 21.79% $ 4,633,871 Subtotal Traffic Mitigation Facilities $ 69,923,000 $ 31,492,471.65 Soft Cost: Construction Contingency (10%) $ 3,149,247.17 Soft Cost: Design and Environmental (15%) $ 4,723,870.75 Soft Cost: Construction Administration and Inspection (15%) $ 4,723,870.75 Total Traffic Mitigation Facilities Costs $ 44,089,460.32 Notes:
1 Percent attributable to new dev elopment based upon additional trips generated by new dev elopment ov er total ex isting and new trips. 2 Cottonw ood Av enue Riv er Crossing project is fully attributable to new dev elopment based on conv ersations w ith the City and the project is in a fully undev eloped area.
Source:
Adopted FY 2024-2028 Capital Improv ement Program Budget.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 36 November 2024 City of Santee
Service Population
Demand for traffic mitigation facilities is based on the additional trips that will be generated by new development through Buildout conditions. The Traffic Mitigation Fee utilizes the land use trip generation assumptions presented in Table 6-2 for the various residential and non-residential land uses based on Institute of Transportation Engineers common Trip Generation Rates (PM Trip Rate) sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition.
Table 6-2: Future Additional Trips
Cost Summary
The Traffic Mitigation Fee will fund the expansion and construction of new traffic mitigation facilities necessary to serve new growth. These facilities will be necessary to meet the demands of the growth of the City at Buildout. The percent attributable to new development is calculated as the proportion of new vehicle trips that will be generated by new growth in the City over the total trips at buildout, which is shown below. The cost attributable to the Cottonwood Avenue River Crossing project is 100 percent as this improvement is surrounded by undeveloped land and it is necessary to support new development.
Land Use
Additional
Units / SF
Trips per
Unit /
1,000 Bldg. SF
Total Trips
(Rounded)
Residential Units per Unit
Single Family 1,444 10.00 14,440
Multi Family 4,466 5.64 25,188
Non-Residential 1,000 Building SF per 1,000 Building SF Commercial1
1,020 22.87 23,327
Office 84 12.62 1,060
Industrial 1,266 2.92 3,697
Total 67,712
Notes:
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (strip commercial).
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 37 November 2024 City of Santee
As new development occurs, there are additional trips associated with the new development, which correlates to a need for additional traffic mitigation improvements. The Nexus Study acknowledges that the existing development will benefit from these transportation improvements once they are constructed and therefore existing developments’ fair share of the improvements (based on trip generation rates) is allocated to existing development and is not spread to new development.
The City will review the potential funding sources for transportation projects to determine the appropriate funding mechanisms as transportation projects move forward as well as identify funding sources through the CIP process and identify action plans in updates to the City's Strategic Plan. It is important for new development to fund their fair share of their impact on transportation facilities. As new development will impact the existing transportation infrastructure, this is a conservative approach that does not burden new development with any existing deficiencies.
Fee Methodology
The Traffic Mitigation Fee uses the Planned Facilities Method to calculate the fee. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, the Planned Facilities Method calculates the proposed fee based on the ratio of planned facilities to the increase in demand associated with new development. This method is appropriate when planned facilities have been define by a long range master plan or expenditure plan which includes specific facilities and cost estimates. As the Planned Facilities Method relies on a long range master plan that may change as the plan is implemented, fees based on this methodology need to be regularly updated to remain consistent with the project lists and current plans.
In order to distribute the share of project costs to each land use type, the total trips generated by new development must be calculated. To calculate the total number of new trips attributable to new development within the City Buildout, the growth projections, detailed in Chapter 3, are multiplied by the corresponding trip generation rates as derived from the Institute of Transportation Description Source Value
Trips
Existing Trips Table 5-4 243,050
Total Buildout Trips Table 5-6 310,762
Net Future Trips 67,712
Trips Allocation
Existing Trips 78.21%
Future Trips 21.79%
Total Trips 100.00%
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 38 November 2024 City of Santee
Engineers (ITE). The Traffic Mitigation Fee is calculated based on the cost per trip generated by new development. The total cost of the facilities attributed to new development identified in Table 6-1 is spread over the anticipated number of trips that will be generated by future development (as shown in Table 6-2) to calculate the cost per trip.
Residential trips are calculated by multiplying the anticipated growth in residential units by the corresponding density’s trip generation rates. Non-residential trips were calculated by multiplying the anticipated growth in 1,000 building square feet with the corresponding trip generation rates.
Commercial trips often coincide with other trips (i.e., Person A stops by the store on their way home from work, Person B stops by a restaurant after grocery shopping, etc.). Pass-by trips are a subset of trips traveling on a road that stops by a near-by commercial development. They are not new trips. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition notes all Retail and Services land uses are entitled to a "pass-by" trip reduction between forty to sixty percent (40-60%). This study assumes a fifty percent (50%) trip reduction for commercial.
To calculate the total number of new trips attributable to new development through Buildout, the growth projections, detailed in Chapter 3, are multiplied by the corresponding trip generation rates identified in Table 6-2.
Table 6-3 calculates the total number of existing trips attributable to existing development. The existing land uses and employees, detailed within Chapter 3, are multiplied by the corresponding trip generation rates identified in Table 6-3. Table 6-3 displays the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition trip generation rates for the land use types within this fee program. The existing trips are calculated to determine future developments responsibility as the total transportation cost is allocated between existing and future trips.
Table 6-3: Existing Trips
Land Use
Existing
Units / SF
Trips per
Unit /
1,000 Bldg. SF
Total Trips
(Rounded)
Residential Units per Unit
Single Family 13,801 10.00 138,010
Multi Family 7,447 5.64 42,001
Non-Residential 1,000 Building SF per 1,000 Building SF Commercial1
2,309 22.87 52,807
Office 190 12.62 2,398
Industrial 2,683 2.92 7,834
Total 243,050
Notes:
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (strip commercial).
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 39 November 2024 City of Santee
The cost per trip is calculated by taking the total cost of the improvements identified as attributable to future within the City and dividing it by the future trips to determine the cost per trip. This calculation is shown in Table 6-4.
Table 6-4: Traffic Mitigation Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip Fee Summary
The Traffic Mitigation Fee for new development is calculated by multiplying the cost per trip identified in Table 6-4 by trip generation rate for each land use. The residential fee per unit is converted to a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per unit by the unit size estimated in Table 3-4. Table 6-5 shows the proposed new Traffic Mitigation Fees for new development.
Table 6-5: Traffic Mitigation Fee Summary
Reduced Traffic Fee
Residential developments near transit stations generate fewer trips than traditional land use configurations that rely on vehicles as the primary mode of transportation. According to various Cost per Trip
Traffic Mitigation Facilities $ 44,089,460.32
Less Fund Balance (1) $ (4,231,223.00)
Total Mitigation Cost $ 39,858,237.32
Trip Generation $ 67,712
Cost per Trip $ 588.64
Notes:
1 Fund Balance as of 06/30/2024 and prov ided by the City 's Finance Department.
Land Use Cost Per Trip Trip Generation (1) Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family $ 588.64 10.00 $ 5,886.40 2,200 2.68$
Multi Family $ 588.64 5.64 $ 3,319.93 1,600 2.07$
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF)
Commercial (2) $ 588.64 22.87 $ 13,462.20
Office $ 588.64 12.62 $ 7,428.64
Industrial $ 588.64 2.92 $ 1,718.83
Notes:
1 Institute of Transportation Engineers common Trip Generation Rates (PM Trip Rate) sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. 2 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 40 November 2024 City of Santee
transportation studies, measurable trip reductions result for projects that are near transit stations and where there are a diversity of land uses that promote connectivity and walkability. To account for the reduced trip rates generated by projects meeting the above characteristics, an additional trip adjustment factor is applied to new residential land uses meeting the following criteria:
4. The housing development is located within one-half mile of a transit station and there is direct access between the project and the transit station along a barrier-free walkable pathway not exceeding one-half mile in length.
5. Convenience retail uses, including a store that sells food, are located within one-half mile of the housing development.
6. The housing development provides either the minimum number of parking spaces required by the local ordinance, or for residential units, no more than one onsite parking space for zero to two bedroom units, and two onsite parking spaces for three or more bedroom units, whichever is less.
For purposes of this reduction, the definition of transit station shall be defined by California Government Code Section 65460.1, “Transit station” means a rail or light-rail station, ferry terminal, bus hub, or bus transfer station. Also, a “housing development” shall be defined by California Government Code Section 66005.1, which is a development project with common ownership and financing consisting of residential use or mixed use where not less than 50 percent of the floorspace is for residential use.
Commercial trips often coincide with other trips (i.e., Person A stops by the store on their way home from work, Person B stops by a restaurant after grocery shopping, etc.) This “pass-by” trip reduction amount is factored into the Commercial trip generation estimates (Table 6-2) as well as the fee for commercial land use in Table 6-5.
Revenue Projections
Table 6-6 summarizes the anticipated Traffic Mitigation Fee revenue collected at Buildout. The revenue will be used to fund the traffic mitigation facilities shown on Table 6-1.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 41 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 6-6: Anticipated Traffic Mitigation Fee Collection at Buildout Nexus Requirement Summary
The proposed Traffic Mitigation Fee meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.
Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Traffic Mitigation Fee is to fund new developments’ share of planned traffic mitigation facilities included in Table 6-1 to serve future development. In order to accommodate this need, new facilities must be built and/or existing facilities expanded.
Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.
The fee will be used to fund the planned traffic mitigation facilities identified in Table 6-1 and detailed in Appendix B, that are necessary to serve increased demand. The improvements were identified through the current City Adopted FY 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Program Budget, City identified projects, and additional City discussions, as the facilities that are required to mitigate the impact of new development in the City.
Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The Traffic Mitigation Fee will be used to fund new developments’ share of the new traffic mitigation facilities and improvements that are necessary to serve the increase in transportation demand due to new development. The cost of the improvements is spread to each land use based on the number of trips generated by each land use. This correlation to trips ensures that each new development pays their fair share of the transportation costs.
Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
SF
Assumptions
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (units)
Single Family 2.68$ 1,444 2,200 $ 8,513,824
Multi Family 2.07$ 4,466 1,600 $ 14,791,392
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF) (1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Commercial 13,462.20$ 1,020.34 $ 13,736,021
Office 7,428.64$ 83.92 $ 623,411
Industrial 1,718.83$ 1,266.30 $ 2,176,554
Total $ 39,841,202
Notes:
1 The proposed fee does not include the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 42 November 2024 City of Santee
The cost per trip calculations is shown in Table 6-4. The fee calculation is shown in Table 6-5.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new residential and non-residential development within the City will generate additional trips that incrementally adds to the need for new traffic infrastructure and facilities to serve the increased residents and businesses within the City and ensure that traffic facilities can accommodate the increased demand. These facilities were identified through City discussions based on future growth of the City. Each new residential and non-residential development pays an impact fee based on the additional trips that is expected to be generated by the new development. To accommodate these additional trips, new traffic mitigation improvements will be needed city-wide. Utilizing trips generated by each development ensures that each type of development pays their fair share of the required new traffic mitigation facilities. This calculation is shown in Table 6-4.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
The transportation facilities that are necessary for the new development are summarized in the planned improvements presented in Table 6-1. Each land use pays their fair share of costs based on the number of trips generated by that land use as shown in Table 6-2. Existing development is netted out from the analysis based on existing trips (calculated on Table 6-3), to ensure that future land uses only pays their fair share of the traffic improvements, as calculated in Table 6-1. The cost per trip is then spread to each land use based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers common Trip Generation Rates (PM Trip Rate) sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition rates. This calculation is shown in Table 6-4. Utilizing trips ensures that each development pays their fair share of the cost.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 43 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 7 Drainage Fee
Background
The Drainage Fee is collected for the purpose of maintaining and servicing the existing drainage facilities in the City. The Drainage Fee is calculated using the Existing Inventory Methodology.
The existing inventory method uses a facility standard based on the ratio of existing facilities to the existing service population on a cost per unit or cost per square foot basis. Under this approach, new development funds the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development. By definition, the existing inventory method ensures that no facility deficiencies are spread to future development. This method is often used when a long range plan for new facilities is not available. An inventory of existing drainage facilities was provided by the City using GIS inventory of drainage facilities the City currently operates and maintains.
Current Level of Service
The current level of service is based on the value of the Drainage Facilities as shown below in Table 7-1.
To determine the current level of service, the value of the existing drainage facilities the cost per impervious acre is calculated in Table 7-2 by totaling the costs associated with the existing drainage facilities, adding the existing fund balance, and dividing by the existing developable impervious acres.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 44 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 7-1: Existing Drainage Facilities
Facility Quantity Unit Cost Per Unit Total Cost
Inlets
Catch Basin EA 331 $ 10,000 $ 3,310,000
Type A EA 51 $ 10,000 $ 510,000
Type B EA 817 $ 10,000 $ 8,170,000
Type C EA 42 $ 15,000 $ 630,000
Type J EA 16 $ 10,000 $ 160,000
Other EA 286 $ 10,000 $ 2,860,000
Subtotal Inlets $ 15,640,000
Cleanouts
Type A EA 700 $ 8,500 $ 5,950,000
Type B EA 119 $ 10,000 $ 1,190,000
Other EA 116 $ 8,500 $ 986,000
Subtotal Cleanouts $ 8,126,000
Headwalls
Straight (Type A) EA 236 $ 8,000 $ 1,888,000
Wing (Type U) EA 106 $ 8,500 $ 901,000
Type L EA 12 $ 8,000 $ 96,000
Other EA 130 $ 8,000 $ 1,040,000
Subtotal Headwalls $ 3,925,000
Pipelines
36" Diameter Storm Drain LF 32,262 $ 350 $ 11,291,700
39" Diameter Storm Drain LF 1,470 $ 400 $ 588,000
42" Diameter Storm Drain LF 27,720 $ 450 $ 12,474,000
45" Diameter Storm Drain LF 616 $ 475 $ 292,600
48" Diameter Storm Drain LF 17,364 $ 500 $ 8,682,000
54" Diameter Storm Drain LF 17,135 $ 700 $ 11,994,500
60" Diameter Storm Drain LF 6,944 $ 850 $ 5,902,400
66" Diameter Storm Drain LF 5,070 $ 900 $ 4,563,000
69" Diameter Storm Drain LF 487 $ 925 $ 450,475
72" Diameter Storm Drain LF 2,739 $ 950 $ 2,602,050
84" Diameter Storm Drain LF 1,150 $ 1,200 $ 1,380,000
96" Diameter Storm Drain LF 487 $ 1,500 $ 730,500
Subtotal Pipelines $ 60,951,225
Subtotal Facilities $ 88,642,225
Soft Costs
Construction Contingency (10% ) $ 8,864,223
Design and Environmental (15% ) $ 13,296,334
Construction Admin / Inspection (15% ) $ 13,296,334
Total Facilities $ 124,099,115
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 45 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 7-2: Drainage Facilities Cost per Impervious Acre Planned Level of Service
The City’s drainage facilities serve both residents and businesses. Demand for services and associated facilities, is based on the City’s impervious acres. The City plans to maintain the current level of service cost per impervious acre, as shown on Table 7-2, with appropriate participation from new development. Per AB602, when applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. This Nexus Study identifies the existing level of service per impervious acre and based on the Nexus Study analysis and discussions with City staff, it has been deemed appropriate to maintain the existing level of service. As described below, this ensures that no facility deficiencies are spread to future development.
Fee Methodology
The Drainage Fee uses the Existing Inventory Method methodology for calculating the fee. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, with the Existing Inventory Method “New development will fund the expansion of facilities at the same standard as currently used to service existing development.” The fees are calculated based on the value of current facilities divided by existing impervious area. Future development will fund facilities at this same standard, which assumes that future facilities will be needed at the same level as current drainage facilities.
Description Value
Existing Facilities (1)
Inlets $ 15,640,000
Cleanouts $ 8,126,000
Headwalls $ 3,925,000
Pipelines $ 60,951,225
Subtotal Costs $ 88,642,225
Soft Costs $ 35,456,890
Existing Fund Balance $ 1,524,379
Total Costs $ 125,623,494
Existing Impervious Acres (2)
6,044
Existing Cost per Impervious Acre $ 20,784.83
Notes:
1 2
of w ay acres.
Ex isting Facilities v alues deriv ed from City Engineer cost estimate of replacement v alue of ex isting facilities.
Ex isting acres in City identified in the Master Drainage Study Update (2023). Ex cludes park/open space and right Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 46 November 2024 City of Santee
Fee Summary
The Drainage Fee is distributed across the various land uses by multiplying by the impervious factor assumptions to calculate a fee per acre, which is then divided by residential unit density and non-residential floor area ratio assumptions to calculate the fee per unit. This fee per unit is then divided by the average unit assumption for Single Family and Multi-Family to reach a fee per square foot for residential land uses and a fee per 1,000 square feet for non-residential land uses (as shown in Table 7-3).
Table 7-3: Drainage Fee Summary
Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections
Table 7-4 summarizes the anticipated future facilities needed for new development.
Land Use
Impervious
Factor (1)
Cost per
Impervious Acre Fee per Acre
Residential
Unit Density
/ FAR (2) Fee per Unit
Average Unit
Size (SF) / FAR
Conversion (3) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family (4) 26% 20,784.83 $ $ 5,404.06 7.00 772.01 $ 2,200 $ 0.35 Multi Family (5) 73% 20,784.83 $ $ 15,172.93 22.00 689.68 $ 1,600 $ 0.43 Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF)
Commercial 85% 20,784.83 $ $ 17,667.11 0.24 10.45 $ 1,689.92 Office 90% 20,784.83 $ $ 18,706.35 0.68 29.62 $ 631.53
Industrial 95% 20,784.83 $ $ 19,745.59 0.35 15.25 $ 1,295.13 Notes:
1 2
3 Av erage unit size based on planned new dev elopment in the City of Santee. Floor Area Ratios used to conv ert EDU per Acre to per KSF: Commercial (0.24), Office (0.68), and Industrial (0.35). 4 5
Imperv ious Factor identified in the Master Drainage Study Update (2023) Table 3-3. The imperv ious factor represents an estimate of the percentage of surface area that w ill generate storm w ater run-off.
Residential Unit Density assumes the median of the land use zones included in the Single Family and Multi-Family groupings. Floor Area Ratio based off City prov ided Impact Fee Unit Assessments Spreadsheet.
Single Family includes HL, R1, R1-A, R2, and R7 land use data from the Master Drainage Study Update (2023). Imperv ious Factor takes the av erage and Residential Density takes the median of these land use zones.
Multi Family includes R14 and R22 land use data from the Master Drainage Study Update (2023). Imperv ious Factor takes the av erage and Residential Density takes the median of these land use zones.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 47 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 7-4: Anticipated Future Drainage Projects
Table 7-5 summarizes the anticipated Drainage Fee revenue that will be utilized to fund the construction and/or expansion of drainage facilities that will serve new development.
Table 7-5: Drainage Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout
Nexus Requirement Summary
The Drainage Fee component of this DIF Study meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.
Project ID Project Name
Construction
Cost
Construction
Contingency
Subtotal
Construction
Design/
Permitting
Project
Total Cost
Project 1A Las Colinas Channel Culvert and Upsizing $ 2,340,000 710,000$ 3,050,000$ $ 1,220,000 $ 4,270,000 Project 1B Cottonwood Ave to Mission Gorge Storm Drain Upsize $ 430,000 130,000$ 560,000$ $ 230,000 $ 790,000 Project 1C Mission Gorge Culvert Project $ 840,000 260,000$ 1,100,000$ $ 440,000 $ 1,540,000 Project 2 Buena Vista Channel Upsizing $ 1,870,000 570,000$ 2,440,000$ $ 980,000 $ 3,420,000 Project 3.1A Cottonwood Ave - Las Brisas Dr to Mission Gorge Rd Storm Drain Upsize $ 340,000 110,000$ 450,000$ $ 180,000 $ 630,000 Project 3.1B Cottonwood Ave - Happy Ln and Mission Gorge Rd Storm Drain Improvements $ 140,000 50,000$ 190,000$ $ 80,000 $ 270,000 Project 3.2 Cottonwood Ave - El Toro Ln and Buena Vista Ave Storm Drain $ 220,000 70,000$ 290,000$ $ 120,000 $ 410,000 Project 3.3 Cottonwood Ave - Prospect Ave and Hwy 52 Storm Drain $ 280,000 90,000$ 370,000$ $ 150,000 $ 520,000 Project 4.1 South Mission Gorge Rd - Olive Ln and Forester Creek Storm Drain Upsize and Extension $ 1,380,000 420,000$ 1,800,000$ $ 720,000 $ 2,520,000 Project 4.2 North Mission Gorge Rd - Town Center Pkwy and Carlton Hills Storm Drain Extension $ 200,000 60,000$ 260,000$ $ 110,000 $ 370,000 Project 5.1 Shadow Hill Rd and Woodside Ave Drainage Improvements $ 1,440,000 440,000$ 1,880,000$ $ 760,000 $ 2,640,000 Project 5.2 Northcote Rd and Woodside Ave Drainage Improvements $ 2,420,000 730,000$ 3,150,000$ $ 1,260,000 $ 4,410,000 Project 6 Pepper Dr and Graves Ave Drainage Improvements $ 530,000 160,000$ 690,000$ $ 280,000 $ 970,000 Project 7 Prospect Ave to San Diego River Storm Drain $ 1,420,000 430,000$ 1,850,000$ $ 740,000 $ 2,590,000 Total Facilities 13,850,000 4,230,000 18,080,000 7,270,000 25,350,000 Source:
City of Santee Master Drainage Study Update, prepared by Rick Engineering Company (July 20, 2023).
Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
SF
Assumptions
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (units)
Single Family 0.35$ 1,444 2,200 $ 1,111,880
Multi Family 0.43$ 4,466 1,600 $ 3,072,608
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Commercial 1,689.92$ 1020.34 $ 1,724,293
Office 631.53$ 83.92 $ 52,998
Industrial 1,295.13$ 1266.30 $ 1,640,023
Total $ 7,601,802
Notes:
1 The proposed fee does not include the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 48 November 2024 City of Santee
Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Drainage Fee is to fund the Drainage Facilities needs generated by new development in the City, such as new or expanded drainage facilities in the City. Each new resident and worker create additional impervious acres which creates a demand for additional drainage facilities. In order to accommodate these needs, new drainage facilities will be built and/or existing facilities will be expanded.
Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.
The Drainage Fee will be used to fund new drainage facilities in order to maintain the City’s existing level of service. The anticipated new facilities are show on Table 7-4 and the associated fee revenue at Buildout is shown on Table 7-5, which will be used to fund new or expanded drainage facilities.
Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The fee will be used to fund new drainage facilities that are necessary to serve the increased impervious acres in the City. New development generates additional impervious acres which increases the demand for drainage facilities. The existing inventory method uses a facility standard based on the ratio of existing facilities to the existing service population on a cost per unit or cost per square foot basis. Under this approach, new development funds the construction of new facilities or the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development.
By definition, the existing inventory method ensures that no facility deficiencies are spread to future development.
Table 7-1 identifies the existing drainage facilities and Table 7-2 calculates the existing cost per impervious acre. The cost per impervious acre is then allocated to each development type based on the impervious factor. The cost per acre is then multiplied by the residential density (dwelling units per acre) and the non-residential floor area ratio for a fee per unit for residential and per 1,000 square feet for non-residential. Finally, the estimated persons per household and employees per 1,000 square feet is applied to the fee. Table 7-3 calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size and cost per 1,000 square feet for nonresidential. Calculating the fees based on the anticipated impervious acres ensures a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development planned to be built.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new development is anticipated to generate additional impervious acres that require drainage facilities. The addition of new residents and workers creates the need for new or expanded drainage facilities to maintain the City’s existing level of service. The Drainage Fee is based on the Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 49 November 2024 City of Santee
additional impervious acres created by the new development and the impervious factor for each land use. This ensures that the need for the facilities is directly related to a particular development’s impact.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
As new development is constructed, new or expanded drainage facilities are needed to meet the City’s existing level of service for drainage facilities. The fee is based on the Existing Inventory Method.
The existing level of service is calculated by taking the total drainage facilities cost and dividing it by the existing impervious acres to derive the existing level of service cost per impervious acre as shown in Table 7-2. The fee for each land use is then calculated by multiplying the cost per impervious acre by the impervious factor assumptions to calculate a fee per acre, which is then divided by residential unit density and non-residential floor area ratio assumptions to calculate the fee per unit. This fee per unit is then divided by the average unit assumption for Single Family and Multi-Family to reach a fee per square foot for residential land uses and a fee per 1,000 square feet for non-residential land uses as shown in Table 7-3. Since the need for the facilities directly correlates to the addition of new residents and workers, determining the fee based on the projected equivalent residents for each land use ensures that new development pays for their fair share of the required future facilities.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 50 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 8 Parks-in-Lieu Fee
Background
Parkland acquisition under the Quimby Act allows for developers to either dedicate land to satisfy their parkland requirement or pay an in-lieu fee. Parks-in-lieu fees are not charged on nonresidential land uses.
Residential development in the City will pay the Parks-in-Lieu Fee at building permit issuance.
The park cost was estimated based on the existing City adopted standard of five (5) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Parkland acquisition under the Quimby Act requires developers to either dedicate land to satisfy their parkland requirement or pay an in-lieu fee. The in-lieu fee is dependent upon appraised land cost and thus, the amount should be agreed upon between the City and the developer when the land dedication is triggered. The City has an existing Quimby in-lieu fee (also known as a Park In-Lieu Fee). As noted in the General Plan, Park In-Lieu Fees stem from the Quimby Act. Quimby provides for the dedication of land for parks, or in certain instances (i.e. a subdivision is small), a fee in-lieu of dedicating land is provided. It is important to note that for the Park In-Lieu Fee, infill projects are exempt, and the fee applies primarily to parkland and land improvements in new neighborhoods.
Parkland
AB1191, also known as the Quimby Act, was established by the California State Legislature in 1965 and codified as California Government Code Section 66477. The Quimby Act outlines the requirements for imposing fees or land dedication for park purposes with a minimum of three (3) acres and a maximum of five (5) acres of green space per 1,000 residents. The Quimby Act allows the legislative body of a city or county, by ordinance, to require the dedication of land or impose a requirement of the payment of fees in-lieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition to the approval of a tentative tract map or parcel map.
Currently, per the City’s municipal code 12.40.060, the applicant for any development must, as a condition of approval of the development, dedicate land, pay fees in lieu of land, or a combination of both, pursuant to that chapter for the purpose of providing park or recreation facilities to serve future residents of such development. As stated in municipal code 12.40.070, the City imposes the in-lieu fee a Parks Land Dedication based on five (5) acres per 1,000 residents or the payment of the in-lieu fee. The amount of a fee in lieu of land to be paid pursuant to this municipal code chapter is set by resolution of the City Council and is based on the City-wide average of land available for park purposes within the urbanized area of the City, plus the estimated cost for developing said land into usable parks. The fee is automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year. The inflation adjustment is two percent or based on the previous calendar year's increase in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (CPI-U: All Items) as published by the Bureau of Labor Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 51 November 2024 City of Santee
Statistics, whichever is higher. The fees received under this chapter are deposited in the park in lieu fund and must be used for the purchase, development and/or rehabilitation of park and recreational facilities.
Service Population
The Parks-in-Lieu Fee is not applied to non-residential development because workers typically do not use parkland.
Current Level of Service
Per data provide by the City, the City has a total of 315.14 acres of developed parkland as shown in Table 8-1.Based on a population of approximately 58,086, there are 5.43 acres of existing parkland per 1,000 persons/residents as shown in Table 8-2. Thus, the current parkland is more than the standard of 5 acres per 1,000 people on a citywide level.
Table 8-1: Parkland Inventory List
Facility Address Acres
Parks
Big Rock Park 8125 Arlette St. 5.00
Deputy Ken Collier Park 9206 Via De Cristina 0.51
Mast Park 9125 Carlton Hills Blvd. 61.16
Mast Park West Trail 9200 Carlton Hiulls Blvd. 43.26
Shadow Hill Park 9161 Shadow Hill Rd. 5.69
Sky Ranch Park 5850 Cala Lily St. 1.36
Town Center Park - East 550 Park Center Dr. 55.00
Town Center Park - West 9545 Cuyamaca St. 10.20
Walker Preserve 9500 Magnolia Ave 105.08
West Hills Park 8790 Mast Blvd. 8.41
Woodglen Vista Park 10250 Woodglen Vista Dr. 15.00
Weston Park 9050 Trailmark Way 4.47
Total Facilities 315.14
Source:
Park data prov ided by the City of Santee.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 52 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 8-2: Existing Level of Service per Resident
Planned Level of Service
AB1191, also known as the Quimby Act, was established by the California State Legislature in 1965 and codified as California Government Code Section 66477. The Quimby Act outlines the requirements for imposing fees or dedicating land for park purposes with a minimum of three (3) acres and a maximum of five (5) acres of green space per 1,000 residents. The Quimby Act authorized cities to require dedication of land or impose a requirement of the payment of fees inlieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park and recreational purposes as a condition of approval of a tentative map or parcel map. Per the City’s municipal code section 12.40.060, except as otherwise provided in that section, only the payment of fees is required for developments containing 50 or fewer parcels, except that when a condominium project, stock cooperative, or community apartment project, as those terms are defined in Sections 4105, 4125, and 4190 of the Civil Code, exceed 50 dwelling units, dedication of land may be required, even though the number of parcels may be less than 50. An applicant for a development containing 50 or fewer parcels may offer to dedicate land in lieu of paying fees, in which event the City Council may elect to accept the land or require the payment of fees, or a combination of both, and in making such election will consider the factors set forth in this section,
1. For developments containing more than 50 parcels, the City Council determines whether to require dedication of land, payment of a fee in lieu of land, or a combination of both, for developments containing more than 50 parcels. In making this determination, the City Council considers the following factors:
2. Conformity of lands offered for dedication with the recreation element of the General Plan;
3. The topography, soils, soil stability, drainage, access, location and general utility of land in the development available for dedication;
4. The size and shape of the development and land available for dedication; Description Acres
Existing Parkland (1)
Park Acreages 315.14
Existing Service Population (2)
58,086
Total Existing Level of Service per Resident 5.43
Notes:
1 2
Ex isting parkland data from the City of Santee.
Ex isting Serv ice population comprises of just residents and does not factor in non-residential.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 53 November 2024 City of Santee
5. The amount, usability, and location of publicly owned property available for combination with dedicated lands in the formation of local park and recreation facilities;
6. The recreation facilities to be privately owned and maintained by future residents of the development.
Currently, per the City’s municipal code 12.40.060, the applicant for any development must, as a condition of approval of the development, dedicate land, pay fees in lieu of land, or a combination of both, pursuant to this chapter for the purpose of providing park or recreation facilities to serve future residents of such development. As stated in municipal code 12.40.070, the City imposes the in-lieu fee a Parks Land Dedication based on five (5) acres per 1,000 residents or the payment of the in-lieu fee. This analysis is based on the existing Quimby standard of five (5) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, where new development will contribute and develop five (5) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Developers can either dedicate land to satisfy their parkland requirement or pay the in-lieu fee. The City is currently meeting this goal.
Fee Credits
Credit for Private Parks:
As stated in the City’s municipal code section 12.40.100, where a development provides a private area for park and recreational purposes and such area is to be privately owned and maintained by the future owner(s) of the development, such area may be credited against up to 50% of the requirement of land dedication or fees payment, if the Director determines that it is in the public interest to do so, and that all of the following standards either have been or will be met prior to approval of the final subdivision map:
A. That yards, court areas, setbacks, and other open areas, required to be maintained by the zoning and building ordinances and other regulations, will not be included in the computation of such private areas;
B. That the private ownership and maintenance of the area will be adequately provided for by recorded written agreement, covenants or restrictions;
C. That the use of the private area is restricted for park and recreational purposes by an open space easement or other instrument approved by the City Attorney; D. That the proposed private area is reasonably adaptable for use for park or recreational purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, access, and location;
E. That the facilities proposed:
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 54 November 2024 City of Santee
1. Are in substantial accordance with the provisions of the recreation element of the General Plan, or adopted community or specific plans,
2. Are appropriate to the recreation needs of the future residents of the development, and
3. Will substitute for the park lands otherwise required to be dedicated in meeting the recreation needs of the residents.
Credit for Public Parks:
As stated in the City’s municipal code section 12.40.120, when an applicant has dedicated a park to the public to serve a subdivision for which a tentative map was filed, the City Council may, pursuant to Sections 12.40.060 and 12.40.070, allow the following credits for such park:
A. A credit against up to 100% of the requirement for land dedication; B. A credit against up to 100% of fee payment required by this chapter for building permits to construct dwellings on the subdivision lots served by the dedicated public park; or C. A credit against fees required for such building permits for the value of improvements to such park installed or constructed by the applicant; provided that such credit must not exceed the value of improvements normally authorized by the City for similar parks.
Fee Methodology
Table 8-3 shows the parkland cost per resident. Based on data from CoStar, completed in August 2023, the estimated cost per acre for parkland acquisition is approximately $1.0 million.
Table 8-3: Parkland Cost per Resident
Fee Summary
Currently, per the City’s municipal code 12.40.060, the applicant for any development must, as a condition of approval of the development, dedicate land, pay fees in lieu of land, or a combination of both, pursuant to this chapter for the purpose of providing park or recreation facilities to serve Park In-Lieu
Park Land Cost per Acre (1) $ 1,000,000
Required Acres/1,000 Residents 5.0
Land Acquisition Cost per Resident $ 5,000.00
Notes:
1 Land cost derived from median of CoStar Sale Comps Map & List Report (08/24/2023) provided by the City, rounded to $1,000,000.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 55 November 2024 City of Santee
future residents of such development. As stated in municipal code 12.40.070, the City imposes the in-lieu fee based on five (5) acres per 1,000 residents or the payment of the in-lieu fee. The Parksin-Lieu Fee per unit is calculated by multiplying the cost per resident by the average number of residents per unit type (density). The fee per unit must then be converted to a fee per square foot (SF) by taking the total fee per unit and dividing by the estimated average unit size for each land use to arrive at the fee per square foot. These calculations are shown in Table 8-4.
Table 8-4: Parks-in-Lieu Fee Cost Summary
Note that applicants can either dedicate land, pay fees in lieu of land, or a combination of both.
Nexus Requirement Summary
The Parks-in-Lieu Fee meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.
Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Parks-in-Lieu Fee is to fund the parkland needs generated by new development in the City. Each new resident creates a demand for parkland. The Quimby standard for the City is five (5) acres of parkland for each 1,000 residents. In order to accommodate these needs, new parkland will be dedicated, an in-lieu fee will be paid for parkland acquisition, or a combination of both. Table 8-3 calculates the parkland cost per resident based on the City’s Quimby standard for parks and the estimated land acquisition cost.
Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.
The Parks-in-Lieu Fee will be used to fund new parkland based on the Quimby standard. New parkland will be dedicated, an in-lieu fee will be paid for parkland acquisition, or a combination of both.
Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The fee will be used to fund new neighborhood, mini and community parks that are necessary to serve the increased residents in the City. New residential development generates additional residents which increases the demand for parkland. The Parks-in-Lieu Fee is calculated using the Land Use Cost Per Resident Density Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family $ 2.93 14,650.00 5,000 $ 2,200 6.66$
Multi Family $ 2.37 11,850.00 5,000 $ 1,600 7.41$
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 56 November 2024 City of Santee
Quimby standard of five (5) acres of park per 1,000 residents. Residential development is responsible for paying its fair share to meet the Quimby requirements. Non-residential uses do not pay the fee since they do not generate additional residents and workers have minimal impact on the City’s park system.
Table 8-3 calculates the cost per resident. Table 8-4 then allocates the cost to each development type based on the estimated persons per household and calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size. By basing the fee on the size of the unit and the estimated number of new residents that is anticipated to be generated by the addition of that square footage, the fee is directly correlated to the increased need for new parks.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new residential development is anticipated to generate new residents. The addition of new residents creates the need for new parkland to meet the City’s Quimby requirement of five (5) acres per 1,000 residents. The fee is directly correlated to the number of new residents expected to be generated by each type of development. Non-residential development does not pay for parks as non-residential developments do not generate a significant demand for parkland. Residential development pays its fair share based on the estimated persons the new unit is expected to generate.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
As new residential units are constructed, new parks are necessary to meet the City’s Quimby requirement of five (5) acres of park per 1,000 residents. The Parks-in-Lieu Fee is calculated by taking the cost per acre of park acquisition times five (5) acres of parks per 1,000 future residents to determine the cost per resident, as shown in Table 8-3. The cost per resident is then allocated to each residential land use based on the persons per household each unit is expected to generate and divided by the average unit size in square feet to determine the fee per square foot as shown in Table 8-4. Since the need for parkland is based on the number of new residents, calculating the fee based on the number of persons each unit is expected to generate and converting to a fee per square feet, ensures that each new residential unit is paying only its fair share of the required facilities.
By determining the fee based on the estimated new residents that would be generated by new development, each new residential unit is paying only its fair share of the parkland required to meet the City’s Quimby requirement. In order to accommodate these needs, new parkland will be dedicated, an in-lieu fee will be paid for parkland acquisition, or a combination of both. Nonresidential land uses are not assessed a Parks-in-Lieu Fee as non-residential development will not generate an increase in parkland demand.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 57 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 9 Fire Facilities Fee
Background
The Fire Facilities Fee is a new proposed DIF that will be used to help fund the construction of new fire stations and the procurement of apparatus to serve the City. The Fire Facilities Fee is calculated using the System Plan Method. The System Plan Method utilizes an integrated approach to allocate the cost of existing facilities and the costs of planned facilities to the total development in the study area. An inventory of existing fire facilities and equipment was provided by the City using facility information and valuation based upon Property Insurance valuation.
Service Population
Demand for fire facilities is based on the total new residents and employees generated at Buildout conditions.
Cost Summary
The Fire Facilities Fee will fund the construction of new fire stations and apparatus to serve the City. These facilities will be necessary to meet the demands of the growth of the City at Buildout.
The cost for the Fire Facilities Fee is based on the integrated cost of the current and future facilities.
As new development occurs, there are new residents and employees associated with the new development, which correlates to a need for additional fire improvements. The Nexus Study acknowledges that the existing development will also benefit from these fire improvements once they are constructed and therefore existing development has a fair share of these improvements.
New development also benefits from the existing fire facilities and therefore new development will fund the integrated system of facilities at the existing standard attributable to new development.
Table 9-1 shows the City’s current fire inventory of fire stations, vehicles and equipment that serve the City.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 58 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 9-1: Fire Facilities Inventory List
Facility Description 1 SF Cost
Fire Stations (1)
Fire Station 4 8950 Cottonwood Ave. 15,185 $ -
Fire Station 5 9130 Carlton Oaks Drive 8,118 $ -
Subtotal Fire Stations $ -
Fire Apparatus
Engine 5 Type I $ 559,899.00
Engine 205 Type I $ 650,000.00
Engine 4 Type I $ 604,402.97
Engine 6128 Type I $ 345,000.00
Engine (New Order) Type I $ 1,020,779.97
Brush 4 Type III $ 371,036.91
Truck 4 Aerial $ 1,080,907.28
Reserve Engine Type I $ 650,000.00
Reserve Engine Type I $ 650,000.00
Medic 4 Ford Ambulance $ 254,865.01
Medic 5 Ford Ambulance $ 211,501.46
BLS 4 Ford Ambulance $ 153,700.00
Reserve Ambulance Ford Ambulance $ 170,050.71
Reserve Ambulance Ford Ambulance $ 160,068.34
Reserve Ambulance Ford Ambulance $ 172,661.16
Patrol 4 Type 6 $ 280,000.00
Subtotal Fire Apparatus $ 7,334,872.81
Support Vehicles
Carson Trailer REMS Trailer $ 19,200.00
Ford F-150 Squad $ 39,123.47
Ford F-150 Battalion 2 $ 79,058.89
Ford F-150 Battalion 2 $ 39,123.47
Ford F-250 Mechanic $ 51,280.00
Ford F-350 Tow Vehicle $ 69,000.00
Ford Explorer Fire Chief $ 36,143.85
Ford Explorer Fire Marshal $ 30,618.41
Ford Explorer 4204 $ 30,618.41
Ford Escape Hybrid Pool Car $ 27,746.00
Chevy Tahoe 4202 $ 113,000.00
Polaris $ 26,934.70
Subtotal Support Vehicles $ 561,847.20
Equipment (outfitting engines, trucks, ambulance, vehicles) Type 1 Engine Equipment Cost 5.00 $820,850.00
Type 3 Engine Equipment Cost 1.00 $133,014.00
Type 6 Engine Equipment Cost 1.00 $151,304.00
Truck 4 Equipment Cost 1.00 $313,016.00
Ambulance Equipment Cost 6.00 $897,396.00
Battalion 2 Equipment Cost 2.00 $109,336.00
Squad Equipment Cost 1.00 $124,128.00
Polaris Equipment Cost 1.00 $9,000.00
Fire Chief/Deputy Chief Vehicles Equipment Cost 3.00 $149,000.00 PPE Equipment Cost 112.00 $544,800.00
Tow Vehicle Equipment Cost 1.00 $32,520.00
Subtotal Equipment $ 3,284,364.00
Total Facilities (Rounded) $ 11,181,084
Notes:
1 Fire Facilities identified in the Santee Fire Department Community Risk Assessment Long-Range Master Plan (March 2023) Ex isting cost not included as facilities w ill be rebuilt and ex panded. Fleet maintenance facility is included in the future facilities as w ell. 2 Fire Station Cost is based on appraised insurance v alue (2017) prov ided by the City (09/05/23). 3 Fire equipment cost prov ided by the Santee Fire Department (3/18/2024).
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 59 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 9-2 shows the City’s planned fire stations, vehicles and equipment that serve the City.
Table 9-2: Fire Facilities Planned Facilities
Facility Description SF/Number Cost
Fire Stations/Facilities
Fire Station 4 Rebuild 18,000 $25,200,000.00
Fire Station 5 Replacement 10,000 $14,000,000.00
Fire Station 20 Construction(1) 13,000 $21,000,000.00
Fire Station 28 Construction(1) 10,000 $16,000,000.00
Fleet Maintenance Facility 4,141 $5,797,400.00
Subtotal Fire Stations/Facilities $81,997,400.00
Fire Apparatus
Engine 5 Type I $1,200,000.00
Engine 205 Type I $1,200,000.00
Engine 4 Type I $1,200,000.00
Engine 6128 Type I $0.00
Brush 4 Type III $690,000.00
Truck 4 Aerial $2,060,000.00
Patrol 4 Type 6 $300,000.00
Reserve Engine Type I $1,200,000.00
Reserve Engine Type I $1,200,000.00
Medic 4 Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Medic 5 Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Remount Ambulance Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Remount Ambulance Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Remount Ambulance Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Remount Ambulance Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Subtotal Fire Apparatus $11,090,000.00
Support Vehicles
Carson Trailer REMS Trailer $16,000.00
Ford F-350 Squad $100,000.00
Ford F-150 Battalion 2 $80,000.00
Ford F-150 Battalion 2 $80,000.00
Ford F-250 Mechanic $80,000.00
Ford Explorer Deputy Chief $57,000.00
Ford Explorer Fire Marshal $57,000.00
Chevy Tahoe 4202 $98,000.00
Ford Escape Hybrid Pool Car $19,000.00
Polaris REMS Unit $24,000.00
Subtotal Support Vehicles $611,000.00
Equipment (outfitting engines, trucks, ambulance, vehicles) Type 1 Engine Equipment Cost 5.00 $820,850.00
Type 3 Engine Equipment Cost 1.00 $133,014.00
Type 6 Engine Equipment Cost 1.00 $151,304.00
Truck 4 Equipment Cost 1.00 $313,016.00
Ambulance Equipment Cost 6.00 $897,396.00
Battalion 2 Equipment Cost 2.00 $109,336.00
Squad Equipment Cost 1.00 $124,128.00
Polaris Equipment Cost 1.00 $9,000.00
Fire Chief/Deputy Chief Vehicles Equipment Cost 2.00 $99,332.00 PPE Equipment Cost 112.00 $544,800.00
Subtotal Equipment $3,202,176.00
Total Facilities (Rounded) $96,900,576.00
Notes:
1 Based on the construction cost of $21,000,000 for Station 20 based upon the figures the City receiv ed from their designer.
Source: Santee Fire Department (3/18/2024).
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 60 November 2024 City of Santee
Fee Methodology
The Fire Facilities Fee uses the System Plan Method to calculate the fee. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, the System Plan Method utilizes an integrated approach to allocate the cost of existing facilities and the costs of planned facilities to the total development in the study area. This method is appropriate when calculating a systemwide fee in which new development will fund an integrated system of facilities at the future standard attributable to new development. By spreading the costs of an integrated system incorporating the existing facilities and planned facilities costs to the total development in the study area, this ensures that new development only pays their proportional share of the total system costs and is not responsible for rectifying any existing deficiencies.
The total fire facilities value is divided by the existing service population to establish the level of service per resident/worker as shown in Table 9-3.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 61 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 9-3: Fire Facilities Level of Service per Capita
Fee Summary
The Fire Facility Fee per unit is calculated by multiplying the cost per capita by the average number of resident equivalents per unit type (density). The cost per capita for non-residential land uses is weighted using the factors shown in Table 3-4. For residential uses, the fee per unit must then be converted to a fee per square foot for each unit type by dividing by the average size of each unit.
Table 9-4 summarizes these calculations.
Description Value
Existing Facilities (1)
Fire Stations (2) $ -
Fire Apparatus $ 7,334,873
Support Vehicles $ 561,847
Equipment (outfitting engines, trucks, ambulance, vehicles) $ 3,284,364 Subtotal Facilities $ 11,181,084
Existing Fund Balance n/a
Total Existing Costs $ 11,181,084
New Facilities (3)
Fire Stations/Facilities $ 81,997,400
Fire Apparatus $ 11,090,000
Support Vehicles $ 611,000
Equipment (outfitting engines, trucks, ambulance, vehicles) $ 3,202,176 Subtotal Facilities $ 96,900,576
Total Future Costs $ 96,900,576
Total Fire Costs $ 108,081,660
Total Buildout Service Population 82,028
Total Cost per Resident $ 1,317.62
Total Cost Service per Worker $ 487.52
Notes:
1 2
3 Fire Facilities identified in the Santee Fire Department Community Risk Assessment Long-Range Master Plan (March 2023).
Santee Fire Department (3/18/2024).
Ex isting cost not included as facilities w ill be rebuilt and ex panded. Fleet maintenance facility is included in the future facilities as w ell.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 62 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 9-4: Fire Facilities Fee Summary
Current Level of Service
Per AB602, when applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for the fire facilities, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. As shown on Table 9-5, the proposed Fire Facilities Fee is less than the existing level of service.
The Fire Facility Fee includes the facilities that are needed to serve the City at buildout and calculates the percentage attributable to new development based on new developments’ proportional share of the new facilities. The percentage attributable to new development is then applied to the costs of the facilities. This methodology conservatively ensures that new development is only funding their proportionate share of the total facilities. As shown in the Nexus Study analysis, based on the cost per capita of the existing facilities, the level of service per capita for existing facilities is lower than the level of service planned for build out. This analysis is based on existing and planned facilities and new developments’ proportional fair share of these planned facilities; therefore, this Nexus Study makes the required nexus findings per AB 602.
Government Code section 66001(g) states, "A fee shall not include the costs attributable to existing deficiencies in public facilities, but may include the costs attributable to the increased demand for public facilities reasonably related to the development project in order to (1) refurbish existing facilities to maintain the existing level of service, or (2) achieve an adopted level of service that is consistent with the general plan." The CIP, shown in Appendix A, will adopt the new level of service. Furthermore, as shown in Table 9-3, the new level of service is the same for both existing residents and new development. The City is not requiring new development to build out at a higher level of service than what is being placed on existing residents at buildout. Rather, the planned level of service, reflected in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan for the Fire Facilities Fee, will provide the higher, adopted level of service for both existing residents and future development to be funded by both existing residents and future development. Moreover, the use of a new, increased Land Use
Cost Per Resident /
Worker Density Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family $ 1,317.62 2.93 3,860.63 $ 2,200 1.75$
Multi Family $ 1,317.62 2.37 3,122.76 $ 1,600 1.95$
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $ 487.52 1.82 887.29 $
Office $ 487.52 4.00 1,950.08 $
Industrial $ 487.52 0.40 195.01 $
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 63 November 2024 City of Santee
level of service is appropriate where, as here, the existing level of service is too low to meet the City’s desired standards and future facility needs.
As residents and employees occupying future development projects become existing residents, they will generate general fund revenues for the City through the payment of property and sales taxes. These general fund revenues can be used for general government purposes throughout the City, including the operation and maintenance of fire and other public facilities and the provision of ongoing government services to the existing population. While the City has the discretion to use general fund revenues to fund the existing population’s fair share costs of future general governmental facilities, these revenues may also be used for any other legal general government service. In contrast, the Fire Facilities fee revenues may only be used to pay for the costs of fire facilities related to new development.
Table 9-5: Fire Facilities Existing Level of Service
Capital Improvements and Revenue Projections
Table 9-7 summarizes the anticipated Fire Facilities Fees. The revenue will be applied to future fire stations and fire equipment to meet the needs of new development. According to discussions with the Fire Chief, the current fire stations are at full capacity and cannot accommodate any additional expansion to meet additional demand. At full Buildout, an additional two fire stations will be needed. The two additional fire stations will also require fire apparatuses, ambulances, and other equipment. Those costs are also shown on Table 9-2. Furthermore, the current stations will Description Value
Existing Facilities (1)
Fire Stations (1) $ 7,790,819
Fire Apparatus $ 7,334,873
Support Vehicles $ 561,847
Equipment (outfitting engines, trucks, ambulance, vehicles) $ 3,284,364 Subtotal Facilities $ 18,971,903
Soft Costs (2) $ 3,116,328
Total Costs $ 22,088,231
Existing Service Population 66,214
Total Existing Level of Service per Resident $ 333.59
Total Existing Level of Service per Worker $ 123.43
Notes:
1 Fire station cost included here to show total ex isting lev el of serv ice. 2 Fire Facilities identified in the Santee Fire Department Community Risk Assessment Long-Range Master Plan (March 2023).
Soft Costs include 10% - Construction Contingency , 15% - Design and Env ironmental, and 15% - Construction Admin/Inspection. These are applied only to the Fire Stations costs (CIP Structures).
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 64 November 2024 City of Santee
need to be rebuilt/replaced. Finally, the fleet maintenance facility will need to be rebuilt as well.
Table 9-6 shows the construction costs for these facilities are shown below:
Table 9-6: Costs of Future Fire Facilities
Table 9-7 shows the anticipated fee revenue at Buildout.
Table 9-7: Anticipated Fire Facilities Estimated Revenue at Buildout Nexus Requirement Summary
The Fire Facilities Fee component of this DIF Study meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.
Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Fire Facilities Fee is to fund new development’s fair-share portion of new fire facilities, such as new fire stations, vehicles and fire equipment required for the additional fire Facility SF/Number Cost
Fire Stations/Facilities
Fire Station 4 Rebuild 18,000 $25,200,000.00
Fire Station 5 Replacement 10,000 $14,000,000.00
Fire Station 20 Construction 13,000 $21,000,000.00
Fire Station 28 Construction 10,000 $16,000,000.00
Fleet Maintenance Facility 4,141 $5,797,400.00
Subtotal Fire Stations/Facilities $81,997,400.00
Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
(units)
Average Unit
Size (SF)
Anticipated
Growth
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (Total SF)
Single Family 1.75$ 1,444 2,200 3,176,800 5,559,400.00 $ Multi Family 1.95$ 4,466 1,600 7,145,600 13,933,920.00 $ Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Commercial 887.29$ 1,020.34 $ 905,337.48
Office 1,950.08$ 83.92 $ 163,650.71
Industrial 195.01$ 1,266.30 $ 246,941.16
Total $ 20,809,249.36
Notes:
1 The proposed fee does not include the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 65 November 2024 City of Santee
personnel that are necessary to mitigate the impacts of new development. Each new resident and worker creates a demand for additional fire facilities. In order to accommodate these needs, new fire facilities will be built and/or existing facilities will be expanded per capita/worker.
Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.
The Fire Facilities Fee will be used to fund new development’s fair-share portion of the fire facilities, new fire stations, vehicles and fire equipment required to serve new development in order to maintain the City’s existing level of service. The anticipated fee revenue at Buildout is shown on Table 9-7. The capital improvement projects are identified in Appendix A.
Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The fee will be used to fund new fire facilities that are necessary to serve the increased residents and workers in the City. New development generates additional residents and workers which increases the demand for fire facilities. The System Plan Method calculates the proposed fee utilizing the totality of the existing and proposed improvements and subsequently dividing by the service population, future development funds an integrated system of facilities at the future standard applicable to new development. As the System Plan Method spreads the totality of fire facilities improvements based on the total demand at the horizon year, existing deficiencies are by definition not being spread to future development.
Table 9-1 identifies the existing fire facilities, Table 9-2 shows the future fire facilities, and Table 9-3 calculates the existing cost per capita/worker. Workers are weighted less than residents to reflect lower per capita service demand. Non-residential buildings are typically occupied less than dwelling units, so it is reasonable to assume that average per-worker demand for services is less than average per-resident demand. The 0.37-weighting factor for workers is based upon a 45-hour work week (40 hours of work plus 1 hour lunch break) relative to a resident’s non-working time of 123 hours (168 hours per week less 45 work hours).
The cost per capita/worker is then allocated to each development type based on the estimated persons per household and employees per 1,000 square feet. Table 9-4 calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size and cost per 1,000 square feet for non-residential. Calculating the fees based on the new residents or employees generated ensures a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development project.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new development is anticipated to generate new residents and workers. The addition of new residents and workers creates the need for new fire facilities to maintain the City’s existing level Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 66 November 2024 City of Santee
of service. The Fire Facilities Fee is based on the number of applicable workers and/or residents each new development is expected to generate, thus ensuring that the need for the facilities is directly related to a particular development’s impact. New workers generate a smaller demand than a resident, thus one worker is considered, on average, as equivalent to 0.37 that of a resident.
The fee for each unit type is calculated in Table 9-4.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
The Fire Facilities fee is based on the System Plan Method, which estimates the costs for an integrated system of existing and future facilities. The fire facilities that are necessary for the new development are summarized in the planned improvements presented in Table 9-2. The existing facilities are shown on Table 9-1. Table 9-3 calculates the total cost per capita based on the total planned and existing cost divided by the Buildout population. The fee for each land use is then calculated by multiplying the cost per capita/worker by the projected number of new resident equivalents that each land use will generate and converting to a fee per square foot for residential and a fee per 1,000 square foot for non-residential land uses as shown in Table 9-4. Since the need for the facilities directly correlates to the addition of new residents and workers, determining the fee based on the equivalent residents each land use is expected to generate ensures that each new development pays for their fair share of the required future facilities.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 67 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 10 Long Range Planning Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the new proposed Long Range Planning Fee. The Long Range Planning Fee is a new proposed fee and will be collected for the purpose of contributing to fund updates to the City’s General Plan Elements and Sustainable Santee Plan. The General Plan is made up of multiple elements that are updated periodically to account for changes in the City over time. The State of California requires that among these elements be included: Land Use, Conservation, Noise, Environmental Justice, Circulation, Open Space, Safety, Air Quality, and Housing. The City of Santee combines the Safety and Environmental Justice elements and additionally includes a Recreation element.
The City most recently completed an update to the Housing Element in 2022. The next upcoming scheduled update is the Land Use Element, which will be completed in 2024.
Current Level of Service
Table 10-1 describes the planned components of the General Plan update and the Sustainable Santee Plan and their associated costs. Table 10-2 calculates new developments fair share of the cost based on the population allocation between existing and new service population.
Table 10-1: Long Range Planning Elements Cost
Long Range Planning Documents Last Updated
Scheduled
Next Update Cost
General Plan Elements (1)
Land Use (2) 2003 2024 $ 680,000
Housing (3) 2022 2028 $ 300,000
Mobility (3) 2017 2030 $ 400,000
Recreation (Parks & Recreation Master Plan) (4) 2017 2030 $ 75,000 Trails (ATP) 2003 2030 $ 300,000
Conservation (Subarea Plan) (5) 2003 2075 2,800,000 $
Noise (4) 2003 2030 $ 75,000
Safety & Environmental Justice (2) 2003 2024 $ 90,000
Community Enhancement (4) 2003 2030 $ 75,000
Total Elements $ 4,795,000
Sustainable Santee Plan 2019 TBD $ 130,000
Total $ 4,925,000
Notes:
1 General plan is made up of multiple elements that are updated periodically to account for changes in the City ov er time. 2 Cost is based on the City budgeted amount for planned update. 3 Cost based on actual costs of last update.
4 Cost based on actual costs of Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update. 5 Cost based on actual costs incurred in the Subarea Plan. The Conserv ation Element includes Open Space, w hich w as funded by Council and is required to be updated sooner than 2075.
Source:
City prov ided information.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 68 November 2024 City of Santee
The future developments fair share of the General Plan updates allocated to new development based on the allocation of future population to Buildout population. The total cost for future development is then divided by the future service population to establish the total cost per resident/worker as shown in Table 10-2.
Table 10-2: Long Range Planning Cost per Resident/Worker Planned Level of Service
The City plans to allocate the fair share cost of the Long Range Planning documents to new development, as shown on Table 10-2. Per AB602, when applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. This Nexus Study identified the total cost for future General Plan updates and Sustainable Santee Plan and allocated the cost proportionally between existing and new development. The City will have to use other funding sources such as General Fund revenue or Grants to fund existing developments share of the cost.
Description Value
Future Facilities
Long Range Planning Updates $ 4,925,000
Population
Existing Service Population 66,214
Total Buildout Service Population 82,028
Net Future Population 15,814
Population Allocation
Existing Service Population 81%
Future Additional Population 19%
Total Population 100%
Cost Allocation
Existing Service Population $ 3,989,250
Future Additional Population $ 935,750
Total $ 4,925,000
Total Cost per Resident $ 59.17
Total Cost per Worker $ 21.89
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 69 November 2024 City of Santee
Fee Methodology
The Long Range Planning Fee is calculated using the Planned Facility Method. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, the Planned Facility Method “Estimates the costs for future facilities needed to serve new development based on a long range expenditure plan for these future facility costs.” This method is appropriate when planned facilities are mostly for the benefit of new development.
The Long Range Planning Fee per unit is calculated by multiplying the cost per resident/worker by the average number of resident/worker equivalents per unit type (density). The cost per capita for non-residential land uses is weighted using the factors shown in Table 3-4. For residential uses, the fee per unit must be converted to a fee per square foot for each unit type by dividing by the average size of each unit. Table 10-3 summarizes these calculations.
Table 10-3: Long Range Planning Fee Summary
Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections
Table 10-1 shows the planned future projects to be funded by this fee. Table 10-4 summarizes the anticipated Long Range Planning Fee revenues collected at Buildout. To ensure that the City can meet the needs of the growing community, the City may choose to introduce additional elements to the General Plan.
Using actual costs from previous General Plan updates and budgeted costs for future updates, additional elements may cost between $75,000 and $2,800,000 each. Revenues collected through development impact fees will not fully fund the currently planned updates. Table 10-4 shows the approximate Long Range Planning Fee revenues collected at Buildout.
Land Use
Cost Per Resident /
Worker Density Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family $ 2.93 173.37 59.17 $ 2,200 0.08$
Multi Family $ 2.37 140.23 59.17 $ 1,600 0.09$
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $ 1.82 39.84 21.89 $
Office $ 4.00 87.56 21.89 $
Industrial $ 0.40 8.76 21.89 $
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 70 November 2024 City of Santee
Table 10-4: Anticipated Long Range Planning Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout Nexus Requirement Summary
The Long Range Planning Fee component of this DIF Study meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.
Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Long Range Planning Fee is to fund new development’s fair-share portion of updates to the General Plan elements that are necessary to mitigate the impacts of new development. New residents and workers change the landscape of the City and necessitate updates to the General Plan and Sustainable Santee Plan.
Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.
The Long Range Planning Fee will be used to fund new development’s fair-share portion of the General Plan and Sustainable Santee Plan based on the allocation of costs to existing and new development based on the service population. The anticipated fee revenue at Buildout is shown on using actual costs from previous updates and budgeted costs for future updates, additional elements may cost between $75,000 and $2,800,000 each. Revenues collected through development impact fees will not fully fund the currently planned updates. Table 10-4 shows the approximate Long Range Planning Fee revenues collected at Buildout.
Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The fee will be used to fund new General Plan and Sustainable Santee Plan updates that are necessary to serve the increased residents and workers in the City. New development generates Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
(units)
Anticipated
Growth
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (Total SF)
Single Family 0.08$ 1,444 3,176,800 254,144.00 $
Multi Family 0.09$ 4,466 7,145,600 643,104.00 $
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Commercial 39.84$ 1,020.34 $ 40,650.35
Office 87.56$ 83.92 $ 7,348.04
Industrial 8.76$ 1,266.30 $ 11,092.79
Total $ 956,339.17
Notes:
1 The proposed fee includes the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 71 November 2024 City of Santee
additional residents and workers which changes the planning landscape of the City. The Planned Facility Method estimates the costs for future facilities needed to serve new development based on a long range expenditure plan for these future facility costs.” Table 10-1 identifies the future general plan costs and Table 10-2 new developments fair share of the cost and the cost per resident/worker. Workers are weighted less than residents to reflect lower per capita service demand. Non-residential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units, so it is reasonable to assume that average per-worker demand for services is less than average perresident demand. The 0.37-weighting factor for workers is based upon a 45-hour work week (40 hours of work plus 1 hour lunch break) relative to a resident’s non-working time of 123 hours (168 hours per week less 45 work hours).
The cost per capita/worker is then allocated to each development type based on the estimated persons per household and employees per 1,000 square feet. Table 10-3 calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size and cost per 1,000 square feet for non-residential. Calculating the fees based on the new residents or employees generated ensures a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development project.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new development is anticipated to generate new residents and workers. The addition of new residents and workers creates the need for updates to the Long Range Planning documents. The Long Range Planning Fee is based on the number of applicable workers and/or residents each new development is expected to generate, thus ensuring that the need for the updates is directly related to a particular development’s impact. New workers generate a smaller demand than a resident, thus one worker is considered, on average, as equivalent to 0.37 that of a resident. The fee for each unit type is calculated in Table 10-3.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
As new development is constructed, new updates to the General Plan elements are needed for these planning documents. The fee is based on the Planned Facility Method and the total cost of the future updates is allocated between the existing service population and the new service population.
Therefore, new development pays their fair share of the of the costs for of the General Plan and other Long Range Planning documents.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 72 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 11 Program Administration Fee
Background
The City, with assistance from consultants, oversees the implementation and administration of the existing and future Fee Program, consistent with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.
AB602, which came into effect on January 1, 2022, adds additional nexus study requirements.
Furthermore, AB1483, which became effective January 1, 2020, requires that public agencies make certain information available on their website, increasing the administrative responsibilities of the City.
A two percent (2%) Administrative Fee is added to fund the costs of the City’s management and ongoing fee program administration, collection, and reporting, based on an analysis of the cost administrative cost necessary to support the DIF Program. This includes costs associated with City staff and consultant time, studies, and administration to support the program. Furthermore, AB602, adds additional administration and reporting cities are responsible for meeting. Industry standard ranges from three to six percent (3-6%) of the fee for the administrative component of a development fee program. The administrative functions include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Annual fee adjustments
• Annual fee reporting
• Additional fee reporting every five years
• Posting of nexus studies and fee schedules on the City’s website • Nexus study updates every eight years (an AB602 requirement) • Master Plans necessary to support the Nexus study updates • Staff and consultant time related to fee preparation, collection, tracking, and administration
• Staff and consultant time needed to track credits and reimbursements for improvements constructed in the fee program
In addition to the aforementioned administrative activities, the City is responsible for both (i) using fee revenues to plan for and construct required capital facilities and (ii) pursue other funding sources, as required, to bridge financial gaps between what is collected and the actual cost to construct needed facilities. A flat fee will impair the City’s ability to abide by AB602’s rigorous requirements.
Consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act, the Administrative Fee will be collected to fund the cost of the program administrative activities, such as administration, collection, and reporting. The Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 73 November 2024 City of Santee
costs to administer will vary each year. In addition to annual program reporting activities and additional fee reporting requirements every five years, AB602 requires the Nexus Study must be updated at least every eight years.
Table 11-1 shows the proposed Program Administration Fee as two percent (2%) of the total Impact Fees charged on each project.
Table 11-1: Program Administration Fee
It is anticipated that administrative costs will continue to increase due to the additional requirements of the state legislation. It is also anticipated that revenue and expenditures will vary year to year due to the cyclical nature of five-year reporting requirements, nexus study updates, and the housing market.
The table below estimates the City’s administrative cost for the fee program and the fee revenue generated. The City’s average annual cost for staff time is based on the City’s current cost related to development impact fee administration. This includes the cost of the Nexus Study, which the City would incur every eight years. Therefore, the annual cost is divided by eight. Given the increase of state legislation, reporting requirements, potential questions, and agreements, the table below estimates additional staff time moving forward. Given the cyclical nature of nexus updates, reporting requirements, and master plans, the cost are shown for those over eight years, based on the escalated cost of the current nexus study, staff time, and other estimated cost. The fee revenue is shown assuming a 2050 Buildout. While the fee revenue is higher, it is assumed that the costs shown are very conservative and a surplus would be needed for additional studies or additional future requirements.
Land Use Public Facilities Traffic Signal Traffic Mitigation Drainage Park in-Lieu Fire Facilities Long Range
Planning Administration (1)
Residential
Single Family $ 5.21 $ 0.37 $ 2.68 $ 0.35 $ 6.66 $ 1.75 $ 0.08 $ 0.34 Multi-Family $ 5.79 $ 0.29 $ 2.07 $ 0.43 $ 7.41 $ 1.95 $ 0.09 $ 0.36 Non-Residential
Commercial Exempt $ 1,884.95 $ 13,462.20 $ 1,689.92 Exempt 887.29 $ $ 39.84 $ 359.28 Office Exempt $ 1,040.14 $ 7,428.64 $ 631.53 Exempt 1,950.08 $ $ 87.56 $ 222.76 Industrial Exempt $ 240.67 $ 1,718.83 $ 1,295.13 Exempt 195.01 $ $ 8.76 $ 69.17 Notes:
1 An administrative fee (2% of each fee) is collected for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) development impact fee program administration costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analysis. (Fee per Square Foot)
(Fee per 1,000 Building Square Foot)
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 74 November 2024 City of Santee
Nexus Requirement Summary
AB 1600 requires that public agencies satisfy five requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project. The required findings are as follows.
Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Program Administration Fee is to provide the funding necessary to administer and update the Fee Program. This includes consultant and City staff time related to services such as providing fee quotes, updating the fee program, tracking revenue and expenditures, updating the City’s website, and preparing annual and five-year reports.
Annual
Escalation
Staff
Time1
Nexus
Study2
Master
Plan3
AB1600
Reporting4Total
3% 12,346 $ 7,624$ $ 37,500 9,074$ $ 66,544
$ 12,716 7,852$ $ 38,625 9,346$ $ 68,540
$ 13,098 8,088$ $ 39,784 9,626$ $ 70,596
$ 13,491 8,331$ $ 40,977 9,915$ $ 72,714
$ 13,491 8,331$ $ 40,977 9,915$ $ 72,714
$ 13,896 8,581$ $ 42,207 15,213$ $ 79,895
$ 14,312 8,838$ $ 43,473 10,669$ $ 77,292
$ 14,742 9,103$ $ 44,777 10,989$ $ 79,611
$ 15,184 9,376$ $ 46,120 11,319$ $ 81,999
$ 151,400 93,500$ $ 459,900 116,700$ $ 821,500
$ 18,900 11,700$ $ 57,500 14,600$ $ 102,700
Average Annual Revenue (assuming 2050 Buildout)5
$ 158,669
1 Includes average annual staff time based on actual cost incurred by staff over the past two years. Cost related to the Nexus Study was divided by 8 years. Additional staff time related to posting of information per AB 1483, additional staff time to administer this fee program, fee credits/reimbursements, additional legislative requirements and legal review, and other administrative duties related to the fee program. Cost related to the staff time for the master plans is included. 2 Projected annual cost based on 8 years for the next Nexus Study update. Based on the current cost for the Nexus Study. 3 Assumes two Master Plans to support the Nexus Study every 8 years. Assumes $150,000 for each in FY 23-24 cost. 4 Assumed additional costs starting in FY 24-25 for AB516 requirements and additional cost in FY 29-30 for the five-year reporting requirements.
5 Estimated annual revenue is slightly higher, but the estimated revenue is cyclical in nature and the City is responsible for both (i) using fee revenues to plan for and construct required capital facilities and (ii) pursuing other funding sources, as required, to bridge financial gaps between what is collected and the actual cost to construct needed facilities. The cost shown in this table is conservative for the administrative cost burden for the City.
Fiscal Year
FY 26-27
FY 25-26
Current
FY 27-28
FY 28-29
FY 29-30
Total (rounded)
Annual Average (rounded)
FY 30-31
FY 31-32
FY 32-33
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 75 November 2024 City of Santee
Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.
The Program Administration Fee will be used to fund the management and administration of the Fee Program. This includes consultant and City staff time related to services such as posting of nexus studies and fee schedules on the City’s website, annual fee adjustments, annual fee reporting, additional fee reporting every five years, application and tracking of fee credits/reimbursements, periodic nexus study updates, staff and consultant time related to fee preparation, collection, tracking and administration.
Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
New residents and workers that result from new development increases the demand for new infrastructure and facilities. These new infrastructure and facility projects will be funded through the Fee program, which requires City and consultant staff time to manage and administer. The Program Administration Fee is a two percent (2%) mark-up of the DIFs.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new development adds residents or workers to the City and in order to maintain the City’s desired level of service, public facilities, traffic facilities (including traffic signals), drainage, fire facilities must be built and parkland acquired, and general plan documents completed. These facilities are funded through the DIFs. To ensure these fees for new development are administered according to state law, regular updates, tracking and reporting, staff time is required. In addition, City staff must provide fee quotes for new development. To collect the funding for these resulting activities, the Program Administration Fee is based on a two percent (2%) mark-up of the Fee Program as summarized in Table 11-1. Using a percentage of the DIFs, ensures that each new development is charged their fair share. A two percent (2%) fee is below the industry standard range of three to six percent (3-6%).
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
The Program Administration Fee provides the funding to administer the DIFs. Having an adopted a policy of collecting a two percent (2%) mark-up to administer fee programs is slightly below the industry standard and effective. Since this fee is calculated as a mark-up of the other DIFs as summarized in Table 11-1, each land use pays for their fair share of the management costs based on their impact to the City’s infrastructure.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 76 November 2024 City of Santee
Section 12 Implementation and Administration
Implementation
According to the California Government Code, prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee, an agency must hold at least one open and public meeting with at least 30 days’ notice. In addition, notice of the time and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered, and a statement that the data required by this section is available, shall be mailed at least 14 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the local agency for mailed notice of the meeting on new or increased fees or service charges. Any written request for mailed notices shall be valid for one year from the date on which it is filed unless a renewal request is filed. At least ten days prior to this meeting, the agency must make data on infrastructure costs and funding sources available to the public. Notice of the time and place of the meeting and a general explanation of the matter are to be published in accordance with Section 6062a of the Government Code, which states that publication of notice shall occur for ten days in a newspaper regularly published once a week or more. The new or increased fees shall be effective no earlier than 60 days following the final action on the adoption or increase of the fees.
Fee Program Administrative Requirements
The Government Code requires the City to report every year and every fifth year certain financial information regarding the fees. The City must make available within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year the following information from the prior fiscal year:
1. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.
2. The amount of the fee.
3. The beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.
4. The amount of the fee collected and the interest earned.
5. An identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures.
6. An identification of an approximate date by which time construction on the improvement will commence if it is determined that sufficient funds exist to complete the project.
7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account and when it will be repaid.
8. Identification of any refunds made once it is determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund all fee related projects.
Beginning in 2024, the code has been expanded to include and expand on some of the requirements. The following requirement was added:
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 77 November 2024 City of Santee
An identification of each improvement identified pursuant to requirement #6 listed on a previous report and whether construction began on the approximate date noted within that report. If construction did not commence by the approximate date provided in the previous report, identify the reason for the delay and a revised approximate commencement date.
In addition, requirement 8 was expanded to now require the following information:
Identification of any refunds made and the number of persons or entities identified to receive those refunds once it is determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund all fee related projects.
The City must make this information available for public review and must also present it at the next regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after this information is made available to the public.
For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the City must make the following findings with respect to any remaining funds in the fee account, regardless of whether those funds are committed or uncommitted:
1. Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.
3. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing any incomplete improvements.
4. Designate the approximate dates on which funding in item (3) above is expected to be deposited into the fee account.
Based on new legislation, a local agency shall inform a person paying a fee subject of both of the following:
• The person’s right to request an audit pursuant to Section 66023. • The person’s right, pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), to file a written request for mailed notice of the local agency’s meeting to review the information made public pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b).
A local agency shall provide a person paying a fee subject to this section a link to the page on the local agency’s internet website where the information made public pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) is available for review.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 78 November 2024 City of Santee
Fee Adjustment Procedures
The DIFs may be adjusted periodically to reflect revised facility requirements, receipt of funding from alternative sources (i.e., state or federal grants), revised facilities or costs, changes in demographics, changes in the average unit square footage, or changes in the land use plan. In accordance with Santee Municipal Code section 12.30.050, Santee Development Impact Fees are automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year. The inflation adjustment is two percent or based on the previous calendar years increase in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (CPI-U:
All Items) as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, whichever is higher. The Municipal Code will need to be updated to adjusting annually on July 1st based on the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the 20-City Average as reported by Engineering News Record (ENR) for a twelvemonth period or a similar published index if the CCI Index is no longer available.
Timing of Fee Payment
Fees will be collected at the time the building permit for the project is issued. All residential projects will pay a fee based on the livable square footage of the residential unit(s). For highdensity residential projects, the fee will be due at the time of the building permit for each building.
For high-density residential projects, the non-residential communal portion (i.e., clubhouse, maintenance facility, gym, etc.) will not be assessed impact fees as the impact is assumed to be captured in the residential fees. Area that are accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be charged impact fees according to use.
Credits and Reimbursement Policies
The City may provide fee credits or reimbursements to developers who dedicate land or construct eligible facilities. Fee credits or reimbursements may be provided up to the cost of the improvement, as shown in this study, subject to periodic inflation adjustments, or the actual cost paid by the developer, whichever is lower. For construction cost overruns, only that amount shown in the study, subject to periodic inflation adjustments, would be credited or reimbursed. The City will evaluate the appropriate fee credit or reimbursement based on the value of the dedication or improvement. Credits or reimbursements may be repaid based on the priority of the capital improvements, as determined by the City. The City will determine fee credits and reimbursements on a case-by-case basis and possibly through the use of a development agreement.
Administrative Fee
An administrative fee of two (2) percent is included as part of each of the fees and may be used for costs for legal, accounting, and other administrative support and development impact fee program administration costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analysis. Additionally, the administrative fee may be used to fund the impact fee nexus study updated that must be updated at a minimum every eight (8) years Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 79 November 2024 City of Santee
pursuant to AB602. Please refer to the individual fee calculation tables for a breakdown of the administration fee.
Programming Revenues with the CIP
The City should maintain its CIP to adequately plan for future infrastructure needs. The CIP should commit all projected fee revenues and fund balances to specific projects that are necessary to serve growth as described in this report. The use of the CIP provides documentation necessary for the City to hold funds in a project account for longer than five years if necessary to collect sufficient funds to complete a project. In addition, the CIP is required per AB602. This report outlines the projects that are to be funded with the fee program and forms the basis of the CIP, as shown in Appendix A.
Fee Reporting
Assembly Bill No. 1483, which became effective January 1, 2020, requires that public agencies make the following information available on their website. The following information must be provided:
1. A current schedule of fees, exactions, and affordability requirements imposed by the city, county, or special district, including any dependent special districts, of the city or county applicable to a proposed housing development project, which shall be presented in a manner that clearly identifies the fees, exactions, and affordability requirements that apply to each parcel.
2. All zoning ordinances and development standards, which shall specify the zoning, design, and development standards that apply to each parcel.
3. The list of information required to be compiled pursuant to Section 65940.
4. The current and five previous annual fee reports or the current and five previous annual financial reports, which were required pursuant to subdivision.
5. An archive of impact fee nexus studies, cost of service studies, or equivalent, conducted by the city, county, or special district on or after January 1, 2018.
Any updates to the above information must be available within 30 days.
Accessory Dwelling Units
An Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is a second unit that is attached or detached from a singlefamily home. In accordance with Assembly Bill No. 881 approved on October 9, 2019, fees will not be charged for an ADU that is less than 750 square feet. For an ADU that is 750 square feet or larger, the ADU will be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. Since the residential fees are now being charged on a square footage basis, ADU fees will be calculated by multiplying the Single-Family Residential fee by the ADU’s square footage.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 80 November 2024 City of Santee
Specialized Development Projects
The fees in this Report may not apply to specialized development projects such as golf courses, cemeteries, sports stadium, or other specialized land uses. For specialized development projects the City will review the development’s impacts to determine the applicable fees. The fee rates presented in this Report may be reduced, exempted, or waived under certain circumstances as determined by the City. Any exemption or reduction in fees will be based on the City’s independent analysis and review of the subject property. In addition, for reuse, density increasing, or rezone projects, the developer shall only be responsible for paying fees for the intensification of the development. In cases of disaster, impact fees will not be charged on the rebuilding of the structures that were affected by the disaster to the extent that the overall size and use of the new structure is similar to the structure destroyed by the disaster. The City will review the development’s increased impacts to determine the applicable fees.
Some developments may include more than one land use type. In these cases, the fee is calculated separately for each land use. The City has the discretion to impose the fees based on the specific aspects of a proposed development regardless of zoning. The fee imposed should be based on the land use type that most closely represents the impacts of the development.
Rebuild or Expansion Projects
For reuse, expansions, density increasing, or rezone projects, the developer shall only be responsible for paying fees for the intensification or expansion. For example, if a homeowner wishes to build an addition to their home that is 100 square feet, the homeowner would be responsible for paying fees for the 100 square foot addition. The City will review the new development’s impacts to determine the applicable fees on a case-by-case basis.
In cases of rebuilding a structure after a demolition, impact fees will not be assessed on the rebuild to the extent that the overall size and use of the new structure is similar to the structure prior to demolition. Similarly, in cases of disaster, impact fees will not be charged on the rebuilding of the structures that were affected by the disaster to the extent that the overall size and use of the new structure is the same as the structure destroyed by the disaster. Impact fees for the new structure will be calculated based on the new rebuilt structure and the fees paid for the previous structure, and the difference between these fees will be assessed. No refunds will be made for rebuilds that have a lower impact fee than the previous structure.
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 81 November 2024 City of Santee
Appendix A: Capital Improvement Plan
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 82 November 2024 City of Santee
Table A-1: Capital Improvement Plan (Page 1 of 2)
Projects Total Project Cost Other Funding Expected DIF Project Cost Public Facilities
Santee Community Center $ 21,000,000 $ 16,800,000 $ 4,200,000 Future Park Recreation Facilities (assumes 74.08 acres) (1) $ 53,708,000 $ - $ 53,708,000 Subtotal Public Facilities $ 74,708,000 $ 16,800,000 $ 57,908,000 Traffic Signal
6 Phase Signal (Magnolia Ave & Princess Joann Rd) $ 415,000 $ - $ 415,000 6 Phase Signal (Cottonwood Ave & Riverview Pkwy) $ 415,000 $ - $ 415,000 8 Phase Signal (Woodside Ave & Mission Del Magnolia/Riderwood Terrance) $ 450,000 $ - $ 450,000 6 Phase Signal (Mission Gorge Rd & Marrokal Ln) $ 415,000 $ - $ 415,000 Pedestrian Signal - Hawk (Mission Gorge Rd & Forester Creek) $ 220,000 $ - $ 220,000 Pedestrian Signal - Hawk (Cuyamaca St & South River Trail) $ 220,000 $ - $ 220,000 Pedestrian Signal - Hawk (Prospect Ave & Forester Creek) $ 220,000 $ - $ 220,000 Update/replace traffic signal cabinet and controllers $ 196,000 $ - $ 196,000 Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades $ 107,800 $ - $ 107,800
Audible Pedestrian Signal Button Installation $ 392,000 $ - $ 392,000 Smart Signals and Controller/Detection Upgrades $ 1,680,000 $ - $ 1,680,000 Signal Modification (Carlton Oaks Dr & Wethersfield Rd) $ 439,000 $ - $ 439,000 Signal Modification (Mast Blvd & Calton Hills Blvd) $ 203,900 $ - $ 203,900 Install new fiberoptic communication $ 216,000 $ 160,000 $ 56,000 Install new fiberoptic communication $ 1,134,000 $ 630,000 $ 504,000 Subtotal Traffic Signal $ 6,723,700 $ 790,000 $ 5,933,700 Traffic Mitigation
Cottonwood Avenue River Crossing $ 20,786,000 $ - $ 20,786,000 Cottonwood Avenue Widening and Sidewalk Improvements $ 12,130,000 $ 9,486,992 $ 2,643,008 Graves Avenue Street Improvements $ 7,544,000 $ 5,900,236 $ 1,643,764 Magnolia Avenue Widening $ 4,786,000 $ 3,743,177 $ 1,042,823 Median Modification - Mission Gorge Road at Marketplace $ 560,000 $ 437,981 $ 122,019 Olive Lane Improvements $ 2,850,000 $ 2,229,013 $ 620,987 Prospect Avenue Improvements - West $ 21,267,000 $ 16,633,129 $ 4,633,871 Subtotal Traffic Mitigation $ 69,923,000 $ 38,430,528 $ 31,492,472 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 83 November 2024 City of Santee
Table A-1: Capital Improvement Plan (Page 1 of 2)
Projects Total Project Cost Other Funding Expected DIF Project Cost Drainage
Project 1A $ 4,270,000 $ - $ 4,270,000
Project 1B $ 790,000 $ - $ 790,000
Project 1C $ 1,540,000 $ - $ 1,540,000
Project 2 $ 3,420,000 $ - $ 3,420,000
Project 3.1A $ 630,000 $ - $ 630,000
Project 3.1B $ 270,000 $ - $ 270,000
Project 3.2 $ 410,000 $ - $ 410,000
Project 3.3 $ 520,000 $ - $ 520,000
Project 4.1 $ 2,520,000 $ - $ 2,520,000
Project 4.2 $ 370,000 $ - $ 370,000
Project 5.1 $ 2,640,000 $ - $ 2,640,000
Project 5.2 $ 4,410,000 $ - $ 4,410,000
Project 6 $ 970,000 $ - $ 970,000
Project 7 $ 2,590,000 $ - $ 2,590,000
Subtotal Drainage $ 25,350,000 $ - $ 25,350,000
Park In-Lieu
Future Park Land (assumes 74.08 acres) (1) $ 74,080,000 $ - $ 74,080,000 Subtotal Park In-Lieu $ 74,080,000 $ - $ 74,080,000
Fire Facilities (2)
Fire Station 4 Rebuild $ 25,200,000 $ - $ 25,200,000
Fire Station 5 Replacement $ 14,000,000 $ - $ 14,000,000 Fire Station 20 Construction $ 21,000,000 $ - $ 21,000,000 Fire Station 28 Construction $ 16,000,000 $ - $ 16,000,000 Fleet Maintenance Facility $ 5,797,400 $ - $ 5,797,400
Subtotal Fire Facilities $ 81,997,400 $ - $ 81,997,400
Long Range Planning
Land Use Element $ Potential Grants 680,000 $ 680,000
Housing Element $ Potential Grants 300,000 $ 300,000
Mobility Element $ Potential Grants 400,000 $ 400,000
Recreation Element $ Potential Grants 75,000 $ 75,000
Trails (ATP) $ Potential Grants 300,000 $ 300,000
Conservation Element (Subarea Plan) $ Potential Grants 2,800,000 $ 2,800,000 Noise Element $ Potential Grants 75,000 $ 75,000
Safety & Environmental Justice Element $ Potential Grants 90,000 $ 90,000 Community Enhancement Element $ Potential Grants 75,000 $ 75,000 Sustainable Santee Plan $ Potential Grants 130,000 $ 130,000 Subtotal Long Range Planning $ 4,925,000 $ - $ 4,925,000 Total (Rounded) $ 337,707,100 $ 56,020,528 $ 281,686,572 Notes:
1 The specific location of park improv ements w ill be dictated by the indiv idual dev elopments and cannot be determined at this time. The assumed acreage is calculated using the General Plan standard of 5 acres per 1,000 people and grow th assumptions in the City . 2 Fire Facilities identified in the Santee Adopted Capital Improv ement Program (Fiscal Years 2024-28) and by the Fire Chief. 2021
An overview of residential and commercial/industrial fees charged by Cities and the County in the San Diego region 1 Introduction
The Building Industry Association of San Diego County is proud to present the 33rd survey of regional development fees. The BIA Fee Survey includes residential and commercial/industrial fees, representing a major source of fee-based revenues for local jurisdictions.
This survey provides an overview of development related fees charged by selected San Diego County land-use agencies. It is provided as a service and planning tool for BIA members.
Although the survey can be used as a starting point for determining what fee obligations can be expected, it is not intended to be a tool for definitive analysis. While the BIA has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the Fee Survey, no guarantees are made.
The BIA strongly cautions against comparing impact fee levels by jurisdiction since methodology, approaches, assumptions, and levels of service may vary widely. Thorough evaluation will require site specific analysis on an independent basis.
Methodology
The BIA Fee Survey was compiled using the results from surveys emailed to 15 Cities, San Diego County, 19 sewer districts, 22 water districts and 34 school districts. The Cities of Coronado, Del Mar, and Solana Beach were excluded in this year’s commercial/industrial and residential fee surveys as they are regions that are assumed to be built out or have low permit activity.
SANDAG RTCIP Fee adjusted from $2,533.15 to $2,583.82.
The City of Imperial Beach did not provide Commercial/Industrial fees as the prototypes suggested for the permits are beyond the City's permitting software ability. This is due to the limited commercial and industrial zones which leads to limited permit issuance for the projects described in the prototypes. If you have any questions regarding these type of fees, please contact the City's Building Inspector.
Fee survey assumptions can be found on page 3.
Sewer, Water and School Fees can be found on pages 43-52.
Editorial Comments
Fees continue to increase in key jurisdictions of San Diego County. Since the 2020 survey, jurisdictions have experienced an average 9% increase in fees throughout the region.
Highlighted below are the jurisdictions with the 3 highest reported fees and 3 lowest reported fees. Please note that these fees are based on what would be paid for one new housing unit (SFD scenario, includes sewer/water/school fees):
Highest
Lowest
Torrey Highlands (Neighborhood in the City of San Diego): $166,277 Chula Vista (East of the 805 freeway): $91,340
Oceanside: $81,337
Poway: $37,594.75
Lemon Grove: $35,342.65
Imperial Beach: $33,119.22
A b o u t t h e
F E E S U R V E Y
2 Single Family Residential: The jurisdictions were asked to calculate the permit issuance, capacity and impact
fees on a prototype 4 bedroom, 3 bath single family
detached residential dwelling unit with 2,700 square
feet of living area, a 600 square foot garage, 240 square foot patio (cover and walls); fireplace; gas & electric hookups; type V, wood frame construction. Along with
engineering and processing fees on a prototype 50 lot,
10 acre subdivision with 100,000 cu yds. of grading.
Multi-Family Residential Townhome - attached: A
Townhome community of 100 units, all 3 Bedroom, 2.5
Bath units at 1,600 sf., with a 400 sq. ft., 2 car attached garage, Type 5 wood frame construction and assumes a
“smart growth” density of 18 du/acre. Figure 10
buildings with 10 units each.
Multi-family Residential Condo - attached: A condo
community of 250 units of 5 stories wood over 2 levels
parking, type III construction, average unit size of 725 SF, subterranean parking, 1.5-2 acre site.
Apartment: Fees are based on a prototype 3 story,
garden style, 250 unit (950 square foot/unit) apartment complex, Type 5 wood frame construction, surface
parked in 10 buildings over 10 acres.
Multi-Tenant Industrial: Fees are based on a prototype
50,000 square foot, single story building with 20
restrooms on 3.59 acres. Figures assume type V
construction with sprinklers and 25% build out.
Occupancy type: Factory, low hazard.
Industrial: Fees are based on a prototype 50,000
square foot, single story building with 6 restrooms
on 3.28 acres. Figures assume type V construction
with sprinklers and 10% build out. Occupancy type:
Factory, moderate hazard.
Research and Development (20% Mezzanine): Fees
are based on a prototype 50,000 square foot, 2 story
building with sprinklers with 12 restrooms on 3.28
acres. Figures assume type III construction at 40%
build out. Occupancy type: 80/20 Offices/Factory,
low hazard.
Flex Office: Fees are based on a new prototype
50,000 square foot, 2 story building with 12
restrooms on 3.1 acres. Figures assume type III
construction with sprinklers at 100% build out.
Class A Multi-Tenant Office: Fees are based on a
prototype 50,000 square foot, 3 story building with
12 restrooms on 2.73 acres. Figures assume type III
construction with sprinklers at 100% build out.
Retail: Fees are based on a prototype 100,000 square
foot, 1 story with 25 restrooms on 9.2 acres. Figures
assume type V construction with sprinklers at 100%
build out.
NOTE: The total cost for each project is subject to
the sewer, water, and school fees. When calculating
total costs, please refer to the Sewer, Water and
School Fees pages (Page 44-52) for the best estimate.
A S S U M P T I O N S
3 FEE CATEGORY
Commercial & Industrial Fees
Residential Fees
Subdivision Fees
Sewer Fees
Water Fees
School Fees
PAGES
5 - 20
21- 39
40- 44
45 - 47
48- 51
52 - 53
Table of Contents
4 C o m m e r c i a l / I n d u s t r i a l Fees
5 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation $3,451,500 $3,451,500 $5,085,000 $6,456,500 $6,456,500 $9,044,000 Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $5,889.44 $5,889.44 $8,164.21 $10,075.40 $10,075.40 $13,703 Building Permit $8,413.48 $8,413.48 $11,663 $14,393.43 $14,393.43 $19,575 MPE Permits $1,992 $1,992 $4,234 $4,234 $4,234 $4,234
Energy $170 $170 $170 $170 $170 $170
Fire Plan Check $3,120 $3,120 $3,051 $2,237 $2,237 $2,237 CBSC $136 $136 $200 $256 $256 $360
License fee SEE PFF SEE PFF SEE PFF SEE PFF SEE PFF SEE PFF Inspection fee N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Seismic $725 $725 $1,068 $1,356 $1,356 $1,903
Subtotal $20,445.92 $20,445.92 $28,550.36 $32,721.83 $32,721.83 $42,182.16 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (1)(1a) $58,789 $58,789 $58,789 $27,722 $27,722 $117,599 Water (2) $35,946 $35,946 $35,946 $35,946 $35,946 $35,946 Public Facilities $120,803 $120,803 $177,975 $225,978 $225,978 $317,135 Traffic (incl signal) $104,800 $65,500 $52,400 $131,000 $131,000 $524,000 Parks
Fire
Drainage/Flood (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3)
MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater $304.00 $304.00 $304.00 $304.00 $304.00 $304.00 Traffic SR-78
Other Fees
Total $341,087.42 $301,788 $353,964.36 $453,671.33 $453,671 $1,037,166 Cost Per sq ft $6.82 $6.04 $7.08 $9.07 $9.07 $10.37
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Comments:
(1) Southeast Carlsbad is served by two sewer districts: Leucadia 760-753-0155 and Vallecitos 760-744-0460 (1a) Sewer Benefit Area fees range from $82 - 3,815 per EDU / This estimate uses Benefit Area 'H' (2) Southeast Carlsbad is served by two water districts: Vallecitos and Olivenhain 760-753-6466 (3) Drainage fees vary depending on project location and range from $2,373 - $29,887/acre. Please check with City for your project's location. (4) Stormwater fees vary, Tier SWPPP, acreage & storm water priority. Contact city for more specifics.
Carlsbad - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 6 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation $3,283,500 $3,283,500 $5,637,500 $6,166,000 $6,166,000 $8,328,000 Valuation Year (5) 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $7,275 $7,643 $14,526 $9,963 $9,963 $9,833
Building Permit $12,543 $12,682 $20,813 $14,250 $14,250 $18,567 MPE Permits $978 $978 $978 $978 $978 $978
Energy
Fire Plan Check (4) $1,615 $1,615 $1,975 $1,975 $2,620 $2,015 CBSC $132 $132 $226 $247 $247 $334
License fee
Inspection fee See Building Permit See Building Permit See Building Permit See Building Permit See Building Permit See Building Permit Seismic $919 $919 $1,579 $1,726 $1,726 $2,332
Subtotal $23,462 $23,970 $40,096 $29,139 $29,784 $34,058 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (1,2) $73,931 $22,333 $44,447 $44,481 $44,481 $92,430 Water (3) Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Public Facilities (PFDIF) $39,027 $35,657 $35,657 $107,136 $94,349 $317,952 Traffic Signal $13,105 $11,973 $10,643 $22,632 $33,219 $447,782 Traffic (west of 805) $144,576 $132,092 $293,540 $416,150 $366,481 $1,152,686 Traffic (east of 805) $475,119 $434,092 $385,859 $410,270 $361,302 $2,164,585 Parks (west of 805)
Parks (east of 805)
Fire Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Drainage/Flood
Inclusionary Housing
MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG Included in Traffic Fee Included in Traffic Fee Included in Traffic Fee Included in Traffic Fee Included in Traffic Fee Included in Traffic Fee Other Fees
Total $624,644 $528,025 $516,702 $613,658 $563,134 $3,056,808 Cost Per sq ft $12.49 $10.56 $10.33 $12.27 $11.26 $30.57 PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Comments:
(1) Includes sewer admin. fee of $220.
Assumption that there are equal amounts of Men and Women Restrooms, with Men's including 2 Urinals, 2 Toilets, and 2 Sinks and Women's including 4 toilets and 2 sinks. Men's = 16 EFU; Women's = 20 EFU. (2) Additional $265 per EDU if project is in Poggi Canyon sewer basin or $1,500 per EDU if project is in Salt Creek sewer basin.
EDU is calculated as follows: For Commecial/Industrial 9.43 EDUs per acre in Poggi Canyon and 6.09 EDUs per acre in Salt Creek (3) Contact Sweetwater Authority or Otay Water District for rates. (4) Assumes one sprinkler/150 square feet.
(5) Fiscal year
Chula Vista - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 7 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL (2, 3) INDUSTRIAL (3) R&D (3) FLEX OFFICE (3) CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE
(3)
RETAIL (3)
Valuation
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $17,662.32 $17,662.32 $22,713.36 $18,060.12 $18,060.12 $30,774.42 Building Permit
MPE Permits
Energy
Fire Plan Check (1)
CBSC
License fee
Building Inspection fee $5,246.88 $5,246.88 $5,540.64 $5,059.20 $5,059.20 $6,926.82 Seismic $1,005.34 $1,005.34 $2,089.61 $2,089.61 $2,089.61 $2,563.34 Construction debris collection deposit $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 City Records $90 $90 $90 $90 $90 $90
General Plan Maintenance $451 $451 $451 $451 $451 $451
Mapping $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10
Other Agency Collection of fees $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 Subtotal $34,475.54 $34,475.54 $40,904.61 $35,769.93 $35,769.93 $50,825.58 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (4) $14,434 $4,330 $8,660 $8,660 $8,660 $18,043
Water (4) $10,664.50 $3,199.35 $6,398.70 $6,398.70 $6,398.70 $13,330.63 Public Facilities (See Community Based DIF/FBA)
Active Transportation in Lieu Fee (6)
Traffic (incl signal)
Parks
Fire
Drainage/Flood
School
Housing Impact Fee - Linkage Fee (5) $0 $0 $40,000 $106,000 $106,000 $128,000 IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Other Fees
Total $59,574.04 $42,004.89 $95,963.31 $156,828.63 $156,828.63 $210,199.21 Cost Per sq ft $1.19 $0.84 $1.92 $3.14 $3.14 $2.10
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Comments:
General Note: Permit inspection fees for Electrical/Mechanical/Plumbing not included. (1) Does not include plan check for fire sprinkler; they are based on head count (info not available). (4) For Sewer/Water: add $79 fee to capacity fees for a plan check fee. (5) The Housing Impact Fee (“Linkage Fee”) is assessed to non-residential development per the following rates:
Office = $2.12 per square foot
Hotel = $1.28 per square foot
R&D = $0.80 per square foot
Retail = $1.28 per square foot
There is no HIF for manufacturing or warehouse uses.
(6) To determine if the Active Transportation In Lieu Fee applies to this project, please input the parcel number in the following calculator:
https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/active-transportation-in-lieu-fee-calculator.xlsx City of San Diego - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 1 for all category assumptions for this survey (2) Assumption made for parking square footage based on: 250 units at 725 sq. ft. = 181,250. 181,250/5 floors = 36,250 each floor. 2 floors of parking equal to residential floor footprint 2 X 36,250 = 72,500. (3) 2% fee increase applied to fee effective July 2017. As part of the proposed fee study presented to City Council, the resolution included language that allows the Development Services Department to increase fees based on the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate. The 2017 CPI inflation rate was 2%. 8 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation $2,889,000 $2,889,000 $5,822,800 $6,381,500 $6,381,500 $8,036,000 Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $5,436 $5,436 $9,617 $10,417 $10,417 $12,782 Building Permit $8,121 $8,121 $14,554 $15,784 $15,784 $19,422 MPE Permits $533 $533 $533 $533 $533 $533
Energy
Fire Plan Check
CBSC
License fee
Inspection fee
Seismic $812 $812 $1,630 $1,787 $1,787 $2,250
Subtotal $14,902 $14,902 $26,334 $28,520 $28,520 $34,987 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (1)
Water (1)
Public Facilities
Traffic (incl signal) (2) $59,781 $59,781 $107,229 $107,229 $107,229 $271,470 Parks
Fire (3) $29,000 $29,000 $29,000 $29,000 $29,000 $58,000 Drainage/Flood (4) $40,500 $40,500 $40,500 $40,500 $40,500 $81,000 School (1)
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Other Fees
Total $144,182 $144,182 $203,063 $205,249 $205,249 $445,457 Cost Per sq ft $2.88 $2.88 $4.06 $4.10 $4.10 $4.45
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Comments:
(1) Other district fees not required. See water/sewer distict and school district fees page for appropriate fees. (2) Average fee rate by land use category Village for the 23 County planning areas. The County TIF fee for residential projects also includes the SANDAG fee. (3) $0.58/sq. ft. for fire mitigation fees.
(4) $0.81/sq. ft. average of 9 special drainage areas.
County of San Diego - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 9 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $15,209 $12,861 $16,245 $16,245 $16,245 $20,045 Building Permit $20,822 $17,215 $22,414 $22,414 $22,414 $28,251 MPE Permits
Energy $1,039 $859 $1,118 $1,118 $1,118 $1,410
Fire Plan Check
CBSC $200 $160 $218 $218 $218 $283
License fee
Inspection fee $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $500
Seismic $1,399 $1,119 $1,523 $1,523 $1,523 $1,975
Subtotal $40,169 $33,714 $43,018 $43,018 $43,018 $52,464 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $24,304 $7,291 $14,582 $14,582 $14,582 $982,000
Water
Public Facilities
Traffic (incl signal) $970 $970 $970 $970 $970 $970
Parks
Fire
Drainage/Flood
School
MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater $1,450 $4,650 $3,720 $5,860 $5,340 $4,750
Other Fees $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25
Total $66,918 $46,650 $62,315 $64,455 $63,935 $1,040,209 Cost Per sq ft $1.34 $0.93 $1.25 $1.29 $1.28 $10.40
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms El Cajon - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 10 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation $3,740,000 $3,740,000 $4,690,000 $3,740,000 $3,740,000 $5,480,000 Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check (1) $21,591.71 $21,591.71 $25,610.68 $21,591.71 $21,591.71 $28,952.77 Building Permit (2) $16,909.27 $16,909.27 $20,346.89 $16,909.27 $16,909.27 $23,205.55 MPE Permits (3) $3,424.53 $3,424.53 $4,128.48 $3,424.53 $3,424.53 $4,713.84 Energy (4) $1,712.27 $1,712.27 $2,064.24 $1,712.27 $1,712.27 $2,356.94 Fire Plan Check (5) $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 CBSC $150 $150 $188 $150 $150 $220
License fee
Inspection fee
Seismic $1,047 $1,047 $1,313 $1,047 $1,047 $1,534
Subtotal $53,834.98 $53,834.98 $62,651.49 $53,834.98 $53,834.98 $69,983.50 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (6)
$3417.00 per EDU/CSD /
$2680.00 per EDU/ESD
$3417.00 per EDU/CSD /
$2680.00 per EDU/ESD
$3417.00 per EDU/CSD /
$2680.00 per EDU/ESD
$3417.00 per EDU/CSD /
$2680.00 per EDU/ESD
$3417.00 per EDU/CSD /
$2680.00 per EDU/ESD
$3417.00 per EDU/CSD /
$2680.00 per EDU/ESD
Water (7)
Public Facilities
Traffic (incl signal) $233,646 $233,646 $233,646 $347,687 $347,687 $402,324 Parks
Fire $9,200 $9,200 $31,480 $37,050 $37,050 $62,700
Drainage/Flood (8)
$.21 per sf new
impervious
$.21 per sf new
impervious
$.21 per sf new
impervious
$.21 per sf new
impervious
$.21 per sf new
impervious
$.21 per sf new
impervious
School (9)
MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater
Traffic SR-78
Other Fees
Total $296,681 $296,681 $327,777 $438,572 $438,572 $535,008 Cost Per sq ft $5.93 $5.93 $6.56 $8.77 $8.77 $5.35
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (2-story, 20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Comments:
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey Encinitas - Commercial & Industrial
(6) Encinitas is served by three sewer districts: Encinitas Sanitation; Cardiff Sanitation; Leucadia Wastewater District. Please contact districts for fee information. (9) The City of Encinitas is served by three school districts: Encinitas Union School District, Cardiff Elementary School District and San Dieguito Union High School District. Please contact districts for fee information.
(3) Included in Building Permit. 8% of Adjusted Permit Fee. (4) Included in Building Permit. 15% of Base Building Permit Fee. (1) Plan check fees include building, engineering, planning and plan check overhead fees. (2) Building permit fees include inspection and overhead fees. (5) Fire Alarm and Fire Sprinkler Plan Check not included; separate review fee paid to 3rd party. (7) Encinitas is serviced by two water districts: San Dieguito and Olivenhain Water District. Please contact districts for fee information. (8) $0.21/sq. ft. impervious area.
11 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation $4,069,000 $3,890,400 $7,473,600 $9,180,000 $9,180,000 $14,720,000 Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $8,734 $8,413 $14,864 $17,935 $17,935 $27,910 Building Permit $13,436 $12,943 $22,868 $27,593 $27,593 $42,939 MPE Permits $90 $90 $90 $90 $90 $90
Energy Plan Check $1,746 $1,682 $2,972 $3,587 $3,587 $5,582 Energy Inspection $2,687 $2,588 $4,573 $5,518 $5,518 $8,587 Disabled Access Plan Check $873 $841 $1,486 $1,793 $1,793 $2,791 Disabled Access Inspection $1,343 $1,294 $2,286 $2,759 $2,759 $4,293 Planning Plan Check $1,366 $1,366 $1,366 $1,366 $1,366 $1,366 Tech Fee $1,261 $1,206 $2,316 $2,845 $2,845 $4,563
Fire Plan Check $275 $275 $275 $275 $275 $275
CBSC (Green) $162 $155 $298 $367 $367 $588
License Fee
Inspection Fee
Seismic (SIMP) $854 $816 $1,569 $1,927 $1,927 $3,091
Subtotal $32,827 $31,669 $54,963 $66,055 $66,055 $102,075 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $31,500 $21,000 $21,000 $64,000 $64,000 $128,000
Water $15,640 $15,640 $15,640 $15,640 $15,640 $15,640
Public Facilities $83,500 $83,500 $83,500 $83,500 $83,500 $221,000 Traffic (incl signal) $118,500 $118,500 $118,500 $158,000 $158,000 $949,000 Parks
Fire
Drainage/Flood $36,000 $36,000 $36,000 $36,000 $36,000 $72,000 MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater
Traffic SR-78
Other Fees (Art) $14,400 $14,400 $14,400 $14,400 $14,400 $29,400 Total $332,367 $320,709 $344,003 $437,595 $437,595 $1,517,115 Cost Per sq ft $6.65 $6.41 $6.88 $8.75 $8.75 $15.17
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Escondido - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 12 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation 50,000 s.f. Ind 25% TI
50,000 s.f. Ind. w/ TI
office 5000 s.f.
50,000 s.f. R&D + TI
20,000 s.f. BO 40% 50,000 s.f. office 50,000 s.f. office 100,000 Retail Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $23,831.81 $21,769.58 $31,393.32 $53,848.66 $49,023.38 $82,875.64 Building Permit $32,574.38 $30,004.51 $42,969.39 $67,274.36 $73,839.39 $112,743.65 MPE Permits $6,395.00 $2,839.40 $5,812.60 $3,661.20 $3,998.90 $6,307.00 Energy Included Included Included Included Included Included Fire Plan Check Included Included Included Included Included Included CBSC Included Included Included Included Included Included License fee $74.00 $74.00 $74.00 $74.00 $74.00 $74.00
C&D Deposit $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $20,000.00 Seismic Included Included Included Included Included Included Subtotal $72,875.19 $64,687.49 $90,249.31 $122,716.68 $136,935.67 $222,000.29 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $28,400 $8,520 $17,040 $17,040 $17,040 $35,500.00 Water contact Helix Water contact Helix Water contact Helix Water contact Helix Water contact Helix Water contact Helix Water Public Facilities
Traffic (incl signal)
Parks
Fire
Drainage/Flood
School
MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater
Other Fees
Total $101,275.19 $73,207.49 $107,289.31 $138,886.68 $153,975.67 $257,500.29 Cost Per sq ft $2.03 $1.46 $2.15 $2.78 $3.08 $2.58
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Comments:
Please note: Grading estimate depends on engineer's estimates (P) Planning Department
(Q) Engineering Department
La Mesa - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 13 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $12,681 $12,681 $12,681 $12,681 $12,681 $25,956 Building Permit $26,276 $26,276 $26,276 $26,276 $26,276 $52,826 MPE Permits Included Included Included Included Included Included Energy Included Included Included Included Included Included Fire Plan Check Included Included Included Included Included Included CBSC Included Included Included Included Included Included License fee
Inspection fee Included Included Included Included Included Included Seismic Included Included Included Included Included Included Subtotal $38,957 $38,957 $38,957 $38,957 $38,957 $78,782 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (1) $21,475 $21,475 $21,475 $21,475 $21,475 $70,500 Water (2)
Public Facilities
Traffic (incl signal)
Parks
Fire
Drainage/Flood
School (3)
Recycling Deposit $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $25,000 MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater
Other Fees
Total $72,932 $72,932 $72,932 $72,932 $72,932 $174,282
Cost Per sq ft $1.46 $1.46 $1.46 $1.46 $1.46 $1.74
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Comments:
(1) Lemon Grove is served by one sewer district: Lemon Grove Sanitation-$1,000 hook-up fee; $534.62 per EDU capacity fee. (2) Contact Helix Water District.
(3) Lemon Grove is served by two districts: Lemon Grove School District and Grossmont Union High School District. Please refer to the school fees page for more information.
Lemon Grove - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 14 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $18,210 $16,593 $31,844 $27,640 $27,640 $30,064 Building Permit (1) $13,730 $11,566 $11,381 $14,740 $11,381 $12,200 MPE Permits
Energy
Fire Plan Check
CBSC
License fee
Inspection fee
Seismic
Subtotal $31,940 $28,159 $43,225 $42,380 $39,021 $42,264 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (2, 2a) $2,605.40 $959.84 $1,874.04 $1,874.04 $1,874.04 $3,062.50 Water
Public Facilities
Traffic (incl signal)
Parks
Fire
Drainage/Flood
MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater
Other Fees
Total $34,545.40 $29,118.84 $45,099.04 $44,254.04 $40,895.04 $45,326.50 Cost Per sq ft $0.69 $0.58 $0.90 $0.89 $0.82 $0.45
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Comments:
(1) Permit fee includes Inspection.
(2) Sewer lateral cost at $6/Lf with a $300 minimum. Part of sewer construction fee-required to have an "A" license to do work. (2a) National City has a formula for their sewer capacity available on City's website.
National City - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 15 Oceanside - Commercial & Industrial
FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $7,698.60 $7,698.60 $7,698.60 $7,698.60 $7,698.60 $8,371.65 Building Permit $20,485.95 $20,485.95 $20,485.95 $12,787.95 $12,787.95 $18,591.30 MPE Permits Included Included Included Included Included Included Energy Included Included Included Included Included Included Fire Plan Check & Inspection $4,097.31 $4,097.31 $4,097.31 $4,097.31 $4,097 $5,392.59 Water $1,154.79 $1,154.79 $1,154.79 $1,154.79 $1,155 $1,255.74 License fee
Inspection fee
Seismic $668 $668 $668 $966 $966 $1,239
Subtotal $33,436.65 $33,436.65 $33,436.65 $25,738.65 $25,738.55 $33,611.28 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $38,971 $38,971 $38,971 $38,971 $38,971 $38,971
Water $46,994 $46,994 $46,994 $46,994 $46,994 $46,994
Public Facilities $45,100 $45,100 $45,100 $45,100 $45,100 $90,200 Traffic (incl signal) $72,350 $72,350 $72,350 $90,000 $90,000 $723,000 Parks
Fire
Drainage/Flood $35,200 $35,200 $35,200 $35,200 $35,200 $84,800 MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater
Traffic SR-78
Other Fees
Total $272,051.65 $272,051.65 $272,051.65 $282,003.65 $282,003.55 $1,017,576.28 Cost Per sq ft $5.44 $5.44 $5.44 $5.64 $5.64 $10.18
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 16 Poway - Commercial & Industrial
FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL* INDUSTRIAL* R&D* FLEX OFFICE* CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE* RETAIL* Valuation $3,360,125 $3,044,150 $4,859,300 $5,345,500 $5,345,500 $7,062,000 Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $13,395.32 $12,395.54 $18,137.96 $19,675.61 $19,675.61 $25,104.82 Building Permit $12,153.76 $11,250.00 $16,440.90 $17,830.86 $17,830.86 $22,738.62 MPE Permits $2,724.48 $2,521.14 $3,689.07 $4,001.82 $4,001.82 $5,106.06 Energy $1,816.31 $1,680.75 $2,459.39 $2,667.88 $2,667.88 $3,404.04 Fire Plan Check
CBSC $1,210.88 $1,120.50 $1,639.59 $1,778.59 $1,778.59 $2,269.36 License fee
Inspection fee
Seismic $941.08 $852.60 $1,360.80 $1,496.88 $1,496.88 $1,977.36 Subtotal $32,241.83 $29,820.53 $43,727.71 $47,451.64 $47,451.64 $60,600.26 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $8,076 $8,076 $8,076 $72,950 $72,950 $145,900
Water $8,474 $8,474 $8,474 $8,474 $8,474 $8,474
Public Facilities
Traffic (incl signal) $69,300 $69,300 $106,650 $166,350 $166,350 $332,700 Parks
Fire $2,034 $2,034 $6,102 $3,883 $3,883 $7,766
Drainage/Flood $4,308 $3,936 $3,936 $3,720 $3,276 $11,040 IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Other Fees
Total $124,434 $121,640 $176,965 $302,829 $302,385 $566,480 Cost Per sq ft $2.49) $2.43) $3.54) $6.06) $6.05) $5.66) PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms *Assuming 2 fixtures per restroom.
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 17 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $1,310 $1,310 $1,310 $3,650 $3,650 $1,310
Building Permit $19,420 $18,748 $26,278 $27,930 $27,930 $53,693 MPE Permits
Energy
Fire Plan Check $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150
CBSC $94 $94 $178 $278 $278 $1,281
License fee
Inspection fee
Seismic $494 $494 $935 $1,946 $1,946 $244
Subtotal $21,468 $20,796 $28,851 $33,954 $33,954 $56,678 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (1)
Water (1)
Public Facilities
Traffic (incl signal) $193,767 $177,035 $288,506 $272,673 $240,128 $1,158,409 Parks
Fire $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $34,000
Drainage/Flood $23,306 $21,294 $21,294 $20,125 $17,723 $59,726 MSCP $649 $614 $541 $1,822
IT Improvement $531 $485 $485 $459 $404 $1,362
Stormwater $2,466 $2,253 $2,253 $2,130 $1,876 $6,320
Traffic SR-78 $92,019 $84,073 $166,394 $157,263 $138,493 $545,137 Other Fees
Total $350,557 $322,936 $525,432 $504,218 $450,119 $1,863,454 Cost Per sq ft $7.01 $6.46 $10.51 $10.08 $9.00 $18.63
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Comments:
(1) The City of San Marcos is served by Vallecitos Water District. Please refer to the water/sewer fees page for more information.
San Marcos - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 18 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation Provided by Applicant Provided by Applicant Provided by Applicant Provided by Applicant Provided by Applicant Provided by Applicant Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $3,729.17 $2,625.29 $9,538.73 $9,383.98 $9,384 $13,840 Building Permit $3,729 $2,625 $9,538.73 $9,383.98 $9,384 $13,840.17 MPE Permits $7,023.48 $5,410.34 $5,293 $5,174 $5,173.59 $7,888.50 Energy
Fire Plan Check $1,208 $1,208 $1,063 $1,795 $1,795 $2,395 CBSC
License fee
Inspection fee
Seismic Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Subtotal $15,689.82 $11,868.92 $25,433.46 $25,736.55 $25,736.55 $37,964.31 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (1)
Water (1)
Traffic $52,050 $52,050 $99,800 $124,750 $124,750 $832,600 Traffic Signal $8,450 $8,450 $16,080 $20,100 $20,100 $134,300 Parks
Fire
Drainage/Flood $111,960 $111,960 $80,860 $130,620 $120,254 $323,440 MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater
Other Fees
Total $188,149.82 $184,328.92 $222,173.46 $301,206.55 $290,840.55 $1,328,304.31 Cost Per sq ft $3.76 $3.69 $4.44 $6.02 $5.82 $13.28
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type III Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type V Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Assumptions: Impervious Areas: 400 SF paving per requred parking space RETAIL: Assume 10-acre site. Impervious area = 100,000 + (100,000/250)*400 = 260,000 SF (60% impervious) OFFICE-CLS A: 2.73-acre site. Impervious area = 16,667 + ((50,000/250)*400 sf) = 96,667 SF (81% Impervious) OFFICE-FLEX: 3.1-acre site. Impervious area = 25,000 + ((50,000/250)*400) = 105,00 SF (78% Impervious) R&D: 3.28-acre site. Impervious area = 25,000 + ((50,000/500)*400 sf) = 65,000 SF (45% Impervious) INDUSTRIAL: 3.28-acre site. Impervious area = 50,000 + ((50,000/500)*400) = 90,000 SF (63% Impervious) MULTI-TENANT INDUST: 3.59-acre site. Impervious area = 50,000 + ((50,000/500)*400) = 90,000 SF (58% Impervious) MPE Permits: RETAIL: Industrial and Retail restrooms contain four fixtures/bathroom - two sinks and two water closets All industrial retail is assumed to have 1600 amps
All buildings are assumed to have 0-15 Devices for fire spaces and 201-350 Fire Sprinkler System Heads Comments:
(1) The City of Santee is served by Padre Dam Municipal Water District. Please refer to the water/sewer fees page for more information.
Santee - Commercial & Industrial
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 19 FEES MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R&D FLEX OFFICE CLASS A MULTITENANT OFFICE RETAIL Valuation $3,471,500.00 $3,471,500.00 $7,505,500.00 $7,505,500.00 $7,505,500.00 $9,350,000.00 Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $7,582.12 $7,582.12 $10,089.42 $10,089.42 $10,089.42 $11,140.50 Building Permit $28,632.92 $28,632.92 $60,866.18 $60,866.18 $60,866.18 $76,595.50 MPE Permits
Energy
Fire Plan Check $1,440.60 $1,440.60 $1,916.99 $1,916.99 $1,916.99 $2,116.70 CBSC
License fee
State Revolving Fee $139.00 $139.00 $301.00 $301.00 $301.00 $374.00 Seismic $972.02 $972.02 $2,101.54 $2,101.54 $2,101.54 $2,618.00 Subtotal $38,766.66 $38,766.66 $75,275.13 $75,275.13 $75,275.13 $92,844.70 Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (1) $69,430.60 $63,435.20 $63,435.20 $59,954.00 $52,798.20 $177,928.00 Water
Public Facilities $27,980.46 $25,564.32 $25,564.32 $24,105.60 $21,228.48 $71,539.20 Traffic (incl signal) $256,500.00 $256,500.00 $256,500.00 $627,500.00 $627,500.00 $1,556,000.00 Parks
Fire $8,702.16 $7,950.72 $7,950.72 $9,048.90 $7,968.87 $26,854.80 Drainage/Flood (2) $6,135.31 $5,605.52 $5,605.52 $5,297.90 $4,665.57 $15,722.80 School
MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater
Traffic SR-78
Aerial Apparatus (3) $16,666.67
Total $407,515.19 $397,822.42 $434,330.89 $801,181.53 $806,102.92 $1,940,889.50 Cost Per sq ft $8.15 $7.96 $8.69 $16.02 $16.12 $19.41
PROTOTYPES: All prototypes use 1 1/2 inch water meter
Multi-Tenant Industrial (1-story): 3.59 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction, Sprinklers, 25% Build Out, 20 Restrooms, Parking 3/1000 Industrial (1-story): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction, Sprinklers, 10% Build Out, 6 Restrooms Research & Development (20% Mezzanine): 3.28 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 40% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Flex Office (2-story): 3.1 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Class A Multi-Tenant Office (3-story): 2.73 Acres, 50,000 sq. ft., Type 3 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 12 Restrooms Retail: 9.2 Acres, 100,000 sq. ft., Type 5 Construction with Sprinklers, 100% Build Out, 25 Restrooms Comments:
(2) Fee based on drainage basin: $1709 - $3700 per acre. (3) Aerial apparatus fee.
Vista - Commercial & Industrial
(1) Vista is served by two sewer districts: Vista Sanitation $4,835 per EDU and Buena Sanitation - $6,192 per EDU. Please contact appropriate agency. 20 23
R e s i d e n t i a l F e e s
21 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome (4), 100
units w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo, podium
construction (type III), 5-story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment (*), 250 units, garden
style, 3 story bldg., type V construction,
surface parking, 10 buildings on 10
acres
Valuation $440,647 $25,825,200 $31,821,700 $38,060,000
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check (2) $1,285.59 $370.56 $181.64 $216.39
Master/Subsequent Check Fee HOURLY RATE IF NEEDED HOURLY RATE IF NEEDED HOURLY RATE IF NEEDED HOURLY RATE IF NEEDED Building Permit (1) (2) $1,836.55 $1,190 $725 $309.13
MPE Permits $340 $340 $340 $16.93
Energy $170 $170 $170 $170
Fire Plan Check/PERMIT $371 $133.14 $17.39 $88.45
CBSC** $16 $8 $4 $6.03
Inspection fee N/A N/A N/A N/A
License fee SEE PFF SEE PFF SEE PFF SEE PFF
Seismic** $93 $54.00 $27 $31.97
Subtotal $4,112.14 $2,266.15 $1,465.43 $838.90
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (7) $2,117 $2,117 $2,117 $2,117
Water (10) $9,808 $570.05 $912.74 $912.74
Public Facilities (PF) (6) $15,422.64 $9,039 $4,455 $5,328.40 Traffic (incl signal) (8)
Parks $7,649 $6,190 $6,190 $6,190
Fire/EMS N/A N/A N/A N/A
Police - - - -
Library - - - -
Drainage/Flood (3) $4,969 $4,969 $11,170 $11,170
School PAID TO DISTRICT PAID TO DISTRICT PAID TO DISTRICT PAID TO DISTRICT Inclusionary Housing
(5) - either $4,515.00 or $2,915.00
depends when the lot was split
(5a) 15% of total project units will
need to be provided onsite or buy
credits into an affordable housing
project if available.
(5a) 15% of total project units will
need to be provided onsite or buy
credits into an affordable housing
project if available.
(5a) 15% of total project units will
need to be provided onsite or buy
credits into an affordable housing
project if available.
Special District Fee - - - -
IT Improvement - - - -
MSCP - - - -
Stormwater $304 $304 $304 $304
Traffic SANDAG $3,390 $2,712 $2,712 $2,034
Traffic SR-78
Other Fees (9)
Total Cost Per Unit $47,771.78 $28,167.02 $29,326.21 $28,895.04 Comments:
(1) Permit fee includes Inspection.
(2) City offers a discount if projected phases are identical floor plans/exterior features. (4) Assumes Local Facility Management Zone 1.
(5) City's inclusionary zoning policy is a "must build" over 6 units. 6 units and under can pay the in-lieu fee of $4,515 per unit. (5a) Recent changes to state law now allow cities to include rental projects in their inclusionary housing ordinance. A limited number of sites require 20%. Contact City for more information. (6) PFF Fees are 3.5% of valuation.
(7) Sewer Connection $998 + Sewer Benefit Area (fee range $82 - 3,815 per EDU/This estimate uses Benefit Area 'H') (8) Bridge and Thoroughfare District cost vary depending on location and range from $0 - $20,280/DU. (*) Assumed average of 1,000 SF each unit.
(**) Based on valuation, paid at permit issuance.
Carlsbad - Residential
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey (10) Assumes 1"potable water service for SFD, one 2" potable service per building on Townhomes, four 2" potable services for 250 unit condo/apartment. Meter sizing and impact fees subject to change on fixture/demand. These are a one time cost and do not apply per unit. (9) There are potential Agriculture Conversion Mitigation Fees of $10,000/AC and depending on habitat impact, cost of Habitat Impact Fees range from $3,437/AC - $34,365/AC. (3) Drainage/Flood fees vary depending on land use, project location and project acreage. Fee ranges from $2,373 - $29,887/acre. Costs reported above are for the assumed 'prototype'. SFD & MFD assumed in Area B/medium runoff with 2 AC lots. Multifamily and Apartment are Area B with high runoff over stated acreage. 22 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome, 100
units w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo, podium
construction (type III), 5-story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site (4)
Apartment, 250 units, garden style, 3
story bldg., type V construction, surface
parking, 10 buildings on 10 acres
Valuation $425,138 $22,550,400 $26,872,425 $31,190,875
Valuation Year (8) 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 Permit Fees
Plan Check $2,895 $349 $125 $85
Master/Subsequent Check Fee (1) $350 $4 $1 $1
Building Permit $2,793 $859 $223 $280
MPE Permits $139 $139 $139 $139
Energy
Fire Plan Check Included in Plan Check Included in Plan Check Included in Plan Check Included in Plan Check CBSC $18 $9 $4 $5
Inspection fee Included in Building Permit Included in Building Permit Included in Building Permit Included in Building Permit License fee
Seismic $55 $29 $14 $16
Subtotal $6,250 $1,389 $507 $527
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (2) $3,937 $3,074.68 $3,074.68 $3,074.68
Water Contact Appropriate Water District Contact Appropriate Water District Contact Appropriate Water District Contact Appropriate Water District Public Facilities (PFDIF) $11,175 $10,569 $10,569 $10,569 Traffic Signals $405.60 $324.48 $243.36 $243.36
Traffic Fees (east of 805) (5) $14,705 $11,764 $8,823 $8,823 Traffic Fees (west of 805) (5) $4,474 $3,579 $2,684 $2,684 Parks (east of 805) (5) $20,695 $15,360 $15,360 $15,360 Parks (west of 805) (5) $13,013 $9,659 $9,659 $9,659
Fire/EMS Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Police Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Library Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Included in PFDIF Drainage/Flood
Inclusionary Housing
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG Included in Traffic Fee Included in Traffic Fee Included in Traffic Fee Included in Traffic Fee Total Cost Per Unit (7) $57,167.97 $42,481.32 $38,577.18 $38,596.86 Comments:
(1) Additional plan check fee after 3rd submittal (includes Building & Fire review) (4) Assumes 17,500 SF parking garage.
(6) Total Cost Per Unit reports Traffic and Parks Fees for East of the I-805. (7) Per unit costs are provided for projects on the east side of I-805, which is a conservative assumption. (8) Fiscal year.
Chula Vista - Residential
(5) For our Traffic fees and Park fees, applicants pay either the west fee, or the east fee, but not both.
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey (2) Includes $45 sewer admin fee. Additional $265 per EDU if project is in Poggi Canyon sewer basin; or $1,500 per EDU if project is in Salt Creek sewer basin. (3) Additional DIF for pedestrian bridges if project is located in Otay Ranch Village 1,2,5, or 6 add $931 per SF DU and $690 per MF DU; or Otay Ranch Village 11 add $2,641 per SF DU and $1,958 per MF DU; or EUC/Millenia add $615.13 per SF DU and $456.10 per MF DU. 23 Permit Issuance Fee SFD (1, 5, 6)
MFU 100 Townhome (1, 5, 6),
100 units w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo (1, 2, 4,
5), podium construction (type III), 5
story, underground parking, 1.5-2 acre
site
Apartment, 250 units (1, 3, 4,
5), garden style, 3 story bldg., type V
construction, surface parking, 10
buildings on 10 acres
Valuation
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check (8) $3,536 $19,018 $70,482 $34,031
Master/Subsequent Check Fee
Building Permit (6)
MPE Permits
Energy
Construction debris collection deposit $1,416 $80,000 $40,000 $95,000 City Records $45 $45 $90 $90
General Plan Maintenance $275 $275 $275 $275
Mapping $10 $10 $10 $10
Other Agency Collection of fees $10 $10 $10 $10
Fire Plan Check
CBSC
License fee
Inspection fee (building) $2,424 $80,488 $34,767 $55,350 Seismic $53 $3,259 $6,471 $8,249
Subtotal $7,769 $183,105 $152,105 $193,015
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (7)
Water (7)
Public Facilities (10) $130,393 $9,127,800 $22,819,500 $22,819,500 Active Transportation In-Lieu Fee (11)
Neighborhood Enhancement In-Lieu Fee (12)
Transportation
Parks
Fire
Drainage/Flood
School
Inclusionary Housing (9) $18,981 $1,124,800 $1,274,187.50 $1,669,625 Library
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG (RTCIP) $3,009 $240,800 $602,000 $602,000 Total $160,499 $10,679,973 $24,852,454 $25,284,926
Cost Per Unit $106,799.73 $99,409.81 $101,139.70
Comments:
(1) Does not include plan check for fire sprinkler. They are based on head count (info not available). (2) Assumption made for parking square footage based on: 250 units at 725 s.f. = 181,250. 181,250/5 floors = 36,250 each floor. 2 floors of parking equal to residential floor footprint 2 X 36,250 = 72,500. (3) Does not include water/sewer capacity plan check, they are based on EDU (info not available). (4) Permit inspection fees for Electrical/Mechanical/Plumbing not included. (6) City of San Diego does not charge for a building permit, it is included inspection fee. (10) For Fee Survey purposes, Public Facility Fees were calculated for the Torrey Highlands neighborhood (FBA Fees). Please refer to the DIF & FBA Fees Charts. (7) City of San Diego reported a permit fee charge for water/sewer hook-ups, which was reported here. To calculate water and sewer impact fees, refer to the Water and Sewer Fee Charts.
Refer to page 1 for all category assumptions for this survey City of San Diego - Residential
$347 $3,468 $4,661 $785
(5) 2% fee increase applied to fee effective July 2018. As part of the proposed fee study presented to City Council, the resolution included language that allows the Development Services Department to increase fees based on the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate. The 2018 CPI inflation rate was 2%. (8) City of San Diego charges a different rate for first additional and each subsequent unit fee. This fee is charged when repetitive SDU,DUP, or townhomes are identical and are submitted at the same time. The applicable inspection fee will be charged for each structure based on size of the building. Please refer to DSD information Bulletin 501 for more information (https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/dsdib501.pdf). (9) Beginning July 1, 2020 the City of San Diego will enforce new Affordable Housing Regulations that were adopted December 2019. The numbers listed above follow the current Inclusionary Affordable Housing Fee. Please contact the City or refer to their website for more information (https://www.sandiego.gov/development-services/news-programs/ahrep). (11) To determine if the Active Transportation In Lieu Fee applies to this project, please input the parcel number in the following calculator:
https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/active-transportation-in-lieu-fee-calculator.xlsx (12) Only required if the developer opts-in to the Housing Solutions incentive programs. Applicants have the option to build a public promenade with recreation and mobility amenities or pay $9.00 per square foot of lot area for projects under 95 feet in height or $11.00 per square foot for projects over 95 feet in height. 24 COMMUNITY Transportation Park Library Fire Per DU C/I $1,000S; TRAN $/ADT
C/I $1,000;
FIRE/SF GBA RTCIP SFU RTCIP MFU
URBANIZED
Barrio Logan $1,136 $11,946 $388 $563 $14,033 $163 $563 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Carmel Mountain Ranch $3,009.00 $2,408.00
Clairemont Mesa $360 $3,858 $899 $129 $5,246 $52 $129 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 College Area $2,195 $11,828 $853 $557 $15,433 $314 $557 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Downtown $1,408 $5,857 $0 $1,244 $8,509 $352 $2,862 (A) $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Encanto Neighborhoods $2,188 $7,201 $39 $471 $9,899 $312 $471 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Fairbanks Ranch $3,009.00 $2,408.00
Golden Hill $1,757 $11,646 $0 $272 $13,676 $251 $272 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Kearny Mesa $529 $8,169 $513 $81 $9,292 $75 $81 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 La Jolla $966 $4,399 $361 $182 $5,909 $211 $182 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Linda Vista (B) $847 $761 $362 $232 $2,202 $121 $344 (B) $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Mid City $621 $12,075 $400 $287 $13,383 $89 $287 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Midway/Pacific Highway $3,762 $3,757 $0 $165 $7,684 $538 $165 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Miramar Ranch North $3,009.00 $2,408.00
Mission Beach $3,677 $0 $0 $0 $3,677 $526 $0 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Mission Valley $1,066 $11,525 $413 $247 $13,251 $152 $247 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Navajo $3,282 $3,506 $1,022 $133 $7,943 $469 $133 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 North Park $755 $5,902 $425 $78 $7,160 $108 $78 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Ocean Beach $875 $5,917 $800 $419 $8,011 $125 $419 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Old Town San Diego $1,913 $1,825 $0 $452 $4,189 $273 $452 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Otay Mesa-Nestor $896 $12,276 $239 $498 $13,909 $128 $498 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Pacific Beach $395 $2,237 $212 $148 $2,993 $57 $148 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Peninsula $1,517 $2,424 $0 $155 $4,097 $217 $155 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Rancho Bernardo $1,362 $850 $673 $19 $2,905 $194 $19 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 San Pasqual SFR/MFR $2,071/$1,450 $0 $0 $0 $2,071/$1,450 $207 $0 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 San Ysidro $1,454 $9,194 $278 $95 $11,021 $207 $95 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Serra Mesa $1,948 $4,870 $488 $724 $8,030 $279 $724 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Skyline-Paradise Hills $1,059 $4,562 $1,035 $284 $6,940 $152 $284 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Southeastern San Diego $988 $8,914 $10 $54 $9,965 $141 $54 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 South University City $254 $614 $717 $730 $2,314 $36 $104 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Subarea II SFR/MFR (C) $41,864/$29,305 (C) (C) $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Tierrasanta $13,199 $3,041 $884 $774 $17,898 $1,886 $774 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Tijuana River Valley $3,009.00 $2,408.00
Torrey Hills $3,009.00 $2,408.00
Torrey Pines $572 $10,578 $0 $0 $11,149 $82 $0 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Uptown $1,101 $10,660 $266 $107 $12,133 $158 $107 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Via de la Valle $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,940 $0 $0 $3,009.00 $2,408.00 Comments:
https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/active-transportation-in-lieu-fee-calculator.xlsx lot area for projects under 95 feet in height or $11.00 per square foot for projects over 95 feet in height.
KEY:
ADT - Average Daily Trip
SF - Square Foot
GBA - Gross Building Area
DIF - Development Impact Fee
FBA - Facilities Benefit Assessment
RTCIP - Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program City of San Diego - Communities - DIF
PUBLIC FACILITIY FEES
Refer to page 1 for all category assumptions for this survey (A) $2,862 fee for Non-residential covers Fire ($870) and Park & Recreation ($1,992). (B) $344 fee for non-residential is per 1,500 sq. ft.
(C) Subarea II Fees vary by non-residential use type.
(D) To determine if the Active Transportation In Lieu Fee (i.e. impact fee for VMT) applies to this project, please input the parcel number in the following calculator:
(E) Only required if the developer opts-in to the Housing Solutions incentive programs. This fee is not an impact fee. Applicants have the option to build a public promenade with recreation and 25 PUBLIC FACILITIY FEES
COMMUNITY SFU MFU COMM. AC IND. AC INST. AC Employment
Center/AC
NonResidential
Per ADT
RTCIP
SFU
RTCIP
MFU
URBANIZING
Black Mountain Ranch $40,915 $28,641 / $15,548 (A) $6,956 (B) $135,429 $3,682 (B) Carmel Valley $33,298 $23,309 $123,534 $114,876 $118,872 Del Mar Mesa $125,709 $93,613 $275,490 $3,009 $2,408
Mira Mesa $38,256 $26,779 $236,805 $83,016 / $90,284 / $71,921 / $108,647
North University City $33,074 $23,152 $2,228
Otay Mesa (West. and East) $41,297 $36,707 $676
Pacific Highlands Ranch $54,486 / $37,052 ( C ) $38,142 $439,599 $0 $156,299 $293,064 Rancho Encantada $4,990 $3,492 $3,009 $2,408
Rancho Penasquitos $36,622 $25,636 $219,732 $3,009 $2,408 Sabre Springs $7,765 $5,436 $1,356 $686 $3,009 $2,408
Scripps Mirarmar Ranch $28,325 $19,828 $110,751 $66,847 $38,239 $3,009 $2,408 Torrey Highlands (D) $130,393 $91,278 $786,270 / $233,403 / $1,052,272 $0 $195,590 $701,344
Comments:
(A) Senior Housing
(B) Assessment per 1,000 SF of gross building area
(C) Del Mar Highlands Estates only
(D) Excludes Fairbanks Highlands
(E) To determine if the Active Transportation In Lieu Fee (i.e. impact fee for VMT) applies to this project, please input the parcel number in the following calculator:
https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/active-transportation-in-lieu-fee-calculator.xlsx $9.00 per square foot of lot area for projects under 95 feet in height or $11.00 per square foot for projects over 95 feet in height.
KEY:
ADT - Average Daily Trip
SF - Square Foot
GBA - Gross Building Area
DIF - Development Impact Fee
FBA - Facilities Benefit Assessment
RTCIP - Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program Refer to page 1 for all category assumptions for this survey City of San Diego - Communities - FBA Fees
(F) Only required if the developer opts-in to the Housing Solutions incentive programs. This fee is not an impact fee. Applicants have the option to build a public promenade with recreation and mobility amenities or pay 26 Permit Issuance Fee SFD(*)
MFU 100 Townhome, 100 units
w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo, podium
construction (type III), 5-story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment, 250 units, garden style,
3 story bldg., type V construction,
surface parking, 10 buildings on 10
acres
Valuation (1) $388,854 $20,866,400 $29,745,300 $28,654,375 Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check $2,704 (2) $311 $175 $174
Master/Subsequent Check Fee $2,771 / $847 (3) N/A N/A N/A Building Permit $2,488 (4) / $2,074 (5) / $1,320 (5) $486 $271 $263 MPE Permits $533 $533 $533
Energy
Fire Plan Check
CBSC
License fee
Inspection fee
Seismic $51 $58 $33 $32
Subtotal $8,014 $1,389 $1,013 $1,002
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (6)
Water (6)
Public Facilities (PF)
Traffic (incl signal) (7) $4,143 $3,623 $3,623 $3,623
Parks (8)(9) $6,650 $6,041 $6,041 $6,041
Fire (10) $1,914 $1,160 $421 $551
Drainage/Flood (11) $2,046 $1,220 $442 $580
School (6)
Inclusionary Housing
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG $2,584 $2,584 $2,583.82 $2,583.82
Total Cost Per Unit $25,351 $16,017 $14,124 $14,380
Comments:
(1) Patio covers under 300 sq. ft. are exempt from permit/plan check. (2) Plan check fee for custom home.
(3) Plan check fee for Model Home/Subsequent fee for Production Home. (4) Permit fee for custom home.
(5) Permit fee for Model Home/Subsequent fee for Production Home. (6) Check with water/sewer or school district based on your project location. (7) Average fee rate by land use category Village for the 23 County planning areas. For residential development only, the TIF fee payment also includes the SANDAG fee/portion. (8) Average based on various districts. Fees range from $4,468 - $9,555. (Single Family) (9) Average based on various districts. Fees range from $3,396 - $10,126. (Multi-Family) (10) $0.58/sq. ft. for fire mitigation fees.
(11) $0.62/sq. ft. average of 9 special drainage areas.
County of San Diego - Residential
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey (*) To clarify the response for Single Family Dwelling (SFD) building permit fees, we included fees for a custom single family residence, tract model single family residence and tract subsequent phase single family residence.
27 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome, 100 units
w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo, podium
construction (type III), 5 story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment, 250 units, garden
style, 3 story bldg., type V construction,
surface parking, 10 buildings on 10
acres
Valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check $3,423 $230,306 $71,592 $105,184
Master/Subsequent Check Fee
Building Permit $3,019 $198,286 $107,436 $136,150
MPE Permits
Energy $151 $9,967 $169,950 $169,950
Fire Plan Check
CBSC $16 $1,000 $1,160 $1,210
Inspection fee $500 $50,000 $125,000 $50,000
License fee $300 $18,800 $47,000 $47,000
Seismic $51 $6,453 $8,117 $3,901
Subtotal $7,461 $514,812 $530,255 $513,395
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $3,472 $347,200 $868,000 $874,770
Water
Public Facilities (PF)
Traffic (incl signal) $27,000 $67,500 $67,500
Parks
Fire/EMS
Police
Library
Drainage/Flood
School
Inclusionary Housing
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater $215 $308,000 $770,000 $770,000
Traffic SANDAG $2,533.15 $253,315 $253,315 $633,287.50
Total $13,681.15 $1,450,327 $2,489,070 $2,858,953
Cost Per Unit $14,374.26 $11,347.16 $11,306.80
El Cajon - Residential
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 28 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome, 100 units
w/attached garages, type V construction at
18 du/acre, 10 bldgs. w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo (1),
podium construction (type III), 5-
story, underground parking, 1.5-2
acre site (A)
Apartment (2), 250 units, garden
style, 3 story bldg., type V
construction, surface parking, 10
buildings on 10 acres
Valuation $285,000 $16,800,000 ($168K/unit) $21,000,000 ($84K/unit) Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check (3) $3,859 $2,118 $1,293
Master/Subsequent Check Fee
Building Permit (4) $2,677 $1,809 $1,429
MPE Permits (5) $481 $314 $185
Energy (6) $262 $171 $100.65
Fire Plan Check (7 SFD, 8 MFD) $448 $288 $134
CBSC $12 $7 $4
Inspection fee
License fee
Seismic $37 $22 $11
Subtotal $7,775 $4,728 $3,156.84
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (9)
$3417.00/EDU-CSD |
$2680.00/EDU-ESD
1 EDU/unit $341,700 CSD | $268,000
ESD
.8 EDU/unit $683,346 CSD |
$536,536 ESD
Water (10)
Public Facilities (PF)
Traffic (incl signal) $20 $20 $1,129.52
Parks (11) $11,928 $8,013 $8,013
Fire/EMS $675 $451 $451
Police
Library
Drainage/Flood (12) $.21 per sf new impervious $.21 per sf new impervious $.21 per sf new impervious School (13)
Inclusionary Housing (14)
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG 2583.82 + $20.00 (+$516.76 for RR) $2583.82 + $20.00 per unit $2583.82 + $20.00 per unit Traffic SR-78
Total Cost Per Unit $23,002.31 $15,816.07 $15,354.18
Comments:
(1) No fee information for MFU 250-unit condo since not allowed by zoning on a 1.5-2.0 acre site. (A) City does not envision this type of
development because of Measure A
Encinitas - Residential
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey (2) Encinitas does not allow 3 stories. Fees assume 2-story construction. (6) Included in Building Permit. 15% of Base Building Permit Fee. (5) Included in Building Permit. 8% of Adjusted Permit Fee. (8) Fire Alarm and Fire Sprinkler Plan Check not included; separate review fee paid to 3rd party for multi family dwelling projects. (3) Plan check fees include building, engineering, planning and plan check overhead fees. (4) Building permit fee includes Inspection and overhead charges. (12) $0.21/sq. ft. impervious area. Not enough information in the development scenarios to provide this calculation. (11) Parks fees include park development and acquisition, open space, trails, and community facilities fees. (7) Fire plan check includes sprinkler check and inspection applies to SFR only. (10) Encinitas is serviced by two water districts: San Dieguito and Olivenhain Water District. Please contact districts for fee information. (13) The City of Encinitas is served by the Encinitas Union School District, Cardiff Elementary School District, and San Dieguito Union High School District. Please refer to school fees page (9) Encinitas is served by three sewer districts: Encinitas Sanitation; Cardiff Sanitation; Leucadia Wastewater District. Please contact districts for fee information. (14) For housing projects with 7 or more units: 15% at low-income level or 10% at very-low income level or City Council approved in-lieu fee on case-by-case basis. Applicable for both ownership and rental developments.
29 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome, 100 units
w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo, podium
construction (type III), 5-story,
underground parking, 1.5- 2 acre site
Apartment, 250 units, garden style,
3 story bldg., type V construction,
surface parking, 10 buildings on 10
acres
Valuation $476,077 $2,772,480 (per bldg/10 units each) $33,071,600 $3,736,250 (per bldg/25 units each) Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check $1,776 $6,808 $62,624 $8,609
Master/Subsequent Check Fee
Building Permit $2,733 $10,475 $96,345 $13,245
MPE Permits $90 $90 $90 $90
Engery Plan Check $355 $1,361 $12,524 $1,721
Energy Permit/Inspection $546 $2,095 $19,269 $2,649
Fire Plan Check $150 $150 $150 $150
Planning Plan Check $556 $1,366 $1,366 $1,366
CBSC (Green) $20 $111 $334 $150
Inspection fee
License fee
Seismic (SIMP) $48 $277 $3,307 $373
Subtotal $6,274 $22,733 $196,009 $28,353
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $7,500 $75,000 $1,406,250 $187,500
Water $7,930 $79,300 $877,500 $87,750
Public Facilities (PF) (2) $4,872 $48,720 $1,218,135 $160,600 Trafiic Local $4,109 $20,540 $513,570 $51,350
Parks $6,849 $6,533 $6,533 $6,533
Art In Public Places $210 $4,200 $53,775 $6,525
Police
Library
Drainage/Flood $1,092 $4,600 $115,000 $11,500
Inclusionary Housing
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG $2,533 $25,330 $645,758 $64,578
Traffic SR-78
Total Cost Per Building $41,369.00 $286,956.00 $5,032,530.16 $604,689.00 Comments:
(1) The Region of Influence Infrastructure Fee in some areas is $1,500/DU.
Escondido - Residential
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 30 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome*, 100 units
w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo*, podium
construction (type III), 5 story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment, 250 units*, garden
style, 3 story bldg., type V construction,
surface parking, 10 buildings on 10
acres
Valuation $249,660 $1,328,000 per building $22,257,500 $1,828,750 per building Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check $1,898.83 $6,821.82 $74,980.37 $8,453.33
Master/Subsequent Check Fee
Building Permit $2,921.28 $10,495.11 $115,354.41 $13,005.12 MPE Permits $502 $5,020 $62,375 $6,175.00
Energy
Fire Plan Check $400 (2) (2) (2)
CBSC $9 $54 $891 $74.00
Inspection fee
License fee
Seismic $32.46 $172.64 $2,893.48 $237.74
Residential Construction Tax $1,200 $11,000 $225,000 $22,500.00 Grading $289.50
Other (1) $2 $2 $2 $2.00
Subtotal $7,255.07 $33,566 $481,496 $50,447
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $5,373 $53,730 $1,343,250 $134,325.00
Water (3)
Public Facilities (PF)
Traffic (incl signal)
Parks
Fire/EMS
Police
Library
Drainage/Flood
School (4)
Inclusionary Housing
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG $2,583.82 $25,331.50 $633,287.50 $25,331.50 *Total $15,211.89 $112,627 $2,458,034 $210,104
Cost Per Unit $11,262.71 $9,832.14 $21,010.37
Comments:
*Fees are reported per building cost for MFU scenarios. (1) Imaging Fee
(2) Varies upon project - Contact the Fire department for permit, plan check, inspection fees. (3) Imperial Beach is served by California American Water. Please contact the district for more information. (4) Imperial Beach is served by two school districts: Sweetwater Union High School District and South Bay Union School District. Please refer to the school fees page for more information.
Imperial Beach - Residential
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 31 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome, 100
units w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10
bldgs. w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo, podium
construction (type III), 5 story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment, 250 units, garden
style, 3 story bldg., type V construction,
surface parking, 10 buildings on 10
acres
Valuation
1 unit SFD - 2,700 s.f. +
600 s.f. garage
10 units - 16,000 s.f. SFD +
4,000 s.f. garage
250 units - 181,250 s.f. condo +
36,250 s.f. garage 25 units - 23,750 s.f./bldg
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check $5,149.94 $19,469.07 $170,194.88 $29,028.62
Building Permit $6,930.26 $26,576.88 $233,738.83 $39,718.53 MPE Permits $1,124.00 $5,788.00 $74,789.70 $74,789.70
Energy Included Included Included Included
Fire Plan Check Included Included Included Included
CBSC Included Included Included Included
records fees $43.14 $50.88 $417.86 $112.16
C&D deposit $540 $4,000 $43,500 $43,500
Seismic Included Included Included Included
Subtotal $13,787.34 $55,884.83 $522,641.27 $187,149.01
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $5,680 $56,800 $1,420,000 $1,420,000
Water contact Helix Water contact Helix Water contact Helix Water contact Helix Water Public Facilities
Traffic (incl signal)
Parks + Quimby (where app.) $5,441 $54,410 $986,250 $986,250 Fire
Drainage/Flood
School
Inclusionary Housing
MSCP
IT Improvement
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG $2,533.15 $25,332 $633,288 $633,288
Other Fees
Total $27,441.49 $192,426.33 $3,562,178.77 $3,226,686.51 Cost Per Unit $19,242.63 $14,248.72 $12,906.75
La Mesa - Residential
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 32 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome, 100 units
w/attached garages, type V construction
at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs. w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo, podium
construction (type III), 5-story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment, 250 units, garden style,
3 story bldg., type V construction,
surface parking, 10 buildings on 10
acres
Valuation
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check (2) $2,574 $97.48 (2) $307.72 $384.34
Master/Subsequent Check Fee Included Included Included Included Building Permit (1, 2) $4,627 $1988.20 (2) $607.57 $710.76 MPE Permits Included Included Included Included
Energy Included Included Included Included
Fire Plan Check Included Included Included Included
CBSC (4) Included Included Included Included
Inspection fee Included Included Included Included
License fee N/A N/A N/A N/A
Seismic (4) Included Included Included Included
Subtotal $7,201 $2,085.68 $915.29 $1,095.10
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $2,255 $601.80 $601.80 $601.80
Water Contact Helix Water District Contact Helix Water District Contact Helix Water District Contact Helix Water District Public Facilities (PF) N/A N/A N/A N/A
Traffic (incl signal) N/A N/A N/A N/A
Parks $900 $639 $639 $639
Fire/EMS N/A N/A N/A N/A
Police N/A N/A N/A N/A
Library N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drainage/Flood N/A N/A N/A N/A
School (3)
Recycling Deposit $675 $400 $181.28 $237.50
Inclusionary Housing N/A N/A N/A N/A
Special District Fee N/A N/A N/A N/A
IT Improvement N/A N/A N/A N/A
MSCP N/A N/A N/A N/A
Stormwater N/A N/A N/A N/A
Traffic SANDAG $2,533.15 $2,533.15 $2,533.15 $2,533.15
Total Cost Per Unit $13,563.65 $6,259.63 $4,870.52 $5,106.55 Comments:
(1) Permit fee includes Inspection.
(2) City offers a discount if projected phases are identical floor plans/exterior features. (3) Lemon Grove is served by two districts: Lemon Grove School District and Grossmont Union High School District. Please refer to school fees page for more information. (4) Based on valuation, paid at permit issuance.
Lemon Grove - Residential
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 33 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome, 100 units
w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo, podium
construction (type III), 5 story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment, 250 units, garden
style, 3 story bldg., type V construction,
surface parking, 10 buildings on 10
acres
Valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check (2) $4,938.84 $1,219.36 $346.68 $346.68
Master/Subsequent Check Fee
Building Permit (1) (2) $5,303.00 $754.11 $105.71 $105.71 MPE Permits
Energy
Fire Plan Check
CBSC
Inspection fee
License fee
Seismic
Subtotal $10,241.84 $1,973.47 $452.39 $452.39
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (3) $777.00 $190.61
Water
Public Facilities (PF)
Traffic (incl signal)
Parks $858.00 $692.00 $692.00 $692.00
Fire/EMS $126.00 $102.00 $102.00 $102.00
Police $318.00 $25.70 $257.00 $257.00
Library $172.00 $139.00 $139.00 $139.00
Drainage/Flood
Inclusionary Housing
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG $2,548.15 $2,548.15 $2,548.15 $2,548.15
Total Cost Per Unit $15,040.99 $5,670.93 $4,190.54 $4,190.54 Comments:
(*) Based on valuation, paid at permit issuance.
(1) Permit fee includes Inspection.
(2) City offers a discount if projected phases are identical floor plans/exterior features.
National City - Residential
(3) Sewer lateral cost at $6/Lf with a $300 minimum. Sewer contractor required to have an "A" license to do work in Public Right of Away. National City has a formula for their sewer capacity available on City's website.
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 34 Oceanside - Residential
Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome (*), 100
units w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs. w/10
units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo (*), podium
construction (type III), 5-story, underground
parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment, 250 units, garden style, 3
story bldg., type V construction, surface
parking, 10 buildings on 10 acres
Valuation Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check $2,134.00 $616 $61.42 280
Master/Subsequent Check Fee
Building Permit $3,985.55 $3,149 $153.80 376
MPE Permits Included Included Included Included
Energy Included Included Included Included
Fire Plan Check & Inspection (1) $1,223 $753 $43.04 $130.52 Water Plan Check $320 $92 $9.21 $41.53
Inspection fee
License fee
Seismic $50 $50 $100 $100
Other (9) $733 $632 $18 $348
Subtotal $8,445.75 $5,292.81 $385.47 $1,275.45
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (2) $7,794) $7,794 $2,546 (6) $2,546 (8)
Water (3, 3a, 3b) $14,598) $469.95 3055.12 3055.12
Public Facilities (PF) $2,621) $2,621 $2,621) $2,621)
Traffic (incl signal & SANDAG) $3,616) $2,893 $2,893) $2,484 Parks $4,431) $4,431 $4,431) $4,431)
Fire/EMS
Police
Library
Drainage/Flood $2,054) $976 $467) $467)
School (4)
Inclusionary Housing
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SR-78
Total Cost Per Unit $43,559.75 $24,477.76 $16,398.59 $16,412.57 Comments:
(1) 20% Bldg Plan Check and Building Permit.
(2) Based on wastewater buy-in fee for single-family residential. (3) The above water and wastewater buy-in fees were last revised January 1, 2021. Assumed all full bathrooms have bath tub. Water buy in fees include cost to install meter, City water system capacity fee (O&M of existing infrastructure, replacement or existing facilities, etc), SDCWA Capacity Charge, SDCWA Water Treatment Capacity Charge. SDCWA charges are collected by the City through water buy-in fees. These fees are pass-through charges to SDCWA. (3a) Based on 3/4" mtr.
(3b) There is a reclaimed water mitigation fee if reclamed water is not constructed onsite. The fee can be 80% of the cost of the potable water construction. (4) Oceanside is served by 4 districts in permit area. Please refer to the school fees page to determine the fee. (5) Building based at 10 buildings.
(6) Based on two 2" meters for each building. At 5 buildings, capacity is for total of ten (10) 2" meters. Construction of service or lateral to public main ("hook-up charge") is not included.
(7) Based on 1.5" meter for each building. At 10 buildings, capacity fee is for total of ten (10) 1.5" meters. Construction of service or lateral to public main ("hook-up charge") is not included.
(8) Based on one 2" meter for each building. At 10 buildings, capacity is for total of ten (10) 2" meters. Construction of service or lateral to public main ("hook-up charge") is not included. The water capacity fee is based on 10 buildings. (9) Surcharges: General Plan 10% permit & Tech 2% permit ($478) and FEMA certification ($255). (*) Assumes 2.5 bathrooms/unit.
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 35 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome (2), 100
units w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo (4)
podium construction (type III), 5
story, underground parking, 1.5-2
acre site
250 MFU Apartment (2,4,
5), garden style, 3 story bldg., type
V construction, surface parking, 10
buildings on 10 acres
Valuation $387,509 $22,610,000 $26,119,328 $28,044,000
Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check $2,575.91 $91,218.50 $78,569.81 $91,489.25
Master/Subsequent Check Fee
Building Permit $2,530.98 $89,627.60 $77,199.50 $82,702.14 MPE Permits $523.92 $18,552.90 $15,980.31 $18,607.98
Energy $379.65 $13,444.10 $11,579.93 $12,405.32
Fire Plan Check $250 $12,000.00 $10,875 $45,744.63
CBSC $16 $910.00 $1,045 $1,122
Inspection fee
License fee
Seismic $50.44 $2,939.30 $3,395.60 $3,645.72
Subtotal $6,326.90 $228,692.40 $198,645.15 $255,717.04
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer $5,836 $583,600 $1,459,000 $1,459,000
Water $5,448 $544,800 $1,362,000 $1,362,000
Public Facilities (PF)
Traffic (incl signal)
Parks $4,562 $359,400 $898,500 $898,500
Fire/EMS $122 $9,615.00 $24,038 $24,038
Drainage/Flood (1) $1,200 $6,660 $2,400 $12,000
Inclusionary Housing $500 $50,000 $125,000 $125,000
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG (included in Traffic fee above) $2,583.82 $258,382.00 $645,955.00 $645,955 Traffic SR-78
Total Cost $26,578.75 $2,041,149.40 $4,715,537.65 $4,782,209.54 Total Cost Per Unit $26,578.75 $20,411.49 $18,862.15 $19,128.84 Comments:
(1) Fee is per acre. Total cost for project is $90,000. (2) Estimate is based on structure size, not unit.
(3) Cost per building.
(4) City of Poway zoning codes do not allow more than 2 stories, except in Poway Road Specific Plan, up to 4 stories is permissible. (5) For 250 MFU Apartment, assume 1,200 sf per unit; 300k sf total floor area, and 30k sf per building.
Poway - Residential
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 36 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome, 100 units
w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo, podium
construction (type III), 5-story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment, 250 units, garden style,
3 story bldg., type V construction,
surface parking, 10 buildings on 10
acres
Valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check $807 $90 $90 $90
Master/Subsequent Check Fee
Building Permit $1,392 $687.26 $760.06 $625.66
MPE Permits
Energy Included Included
Fire Plan Check $150 $1.50 $0.60 $0.60
CBSC $13 $6.80 $6.79 $6.79
Inspection fee
License fee
Seismic $30 $17 $22.07 $22.07
Subtotal $2,392 $802.56 $879.52 $745.12
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer
Water
Public Facilities (PF)
Traffic (incl signal) $4,343 $1,643.86 $1,643.86 $1,643.86 Parks $6,251 $6,251 $6,251 $6,251
Fire/EMS $1,122 $544 $510 $510
Police
Library
Drainage/Flood $1,298 $2,272.20 $51.94 $259.68
Inclusionary Housing $9,300 $9,300 $9,300
Special District Fee
IT Improvement $44 $44 $44 $44
MSCP $103 $103 $103 $103
Stormwater $221 $221 $221 $221
Traffic SANDAG $2,583.82 $2,583.82 $2,583.82 $2,583.82
Traffic SR-78 $3,204 $1,923 $1,923 $1,923
Total Cost Per Unit $30,861.68 $25,688.44 $23,511.14 $14,284.48 San Marcos - Residential
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 37 Permit Issuance Fee SFD (1) CUSTOM HOME
MFU 100 Townhome (5), 100
units w/attached garages, type V
construction at 18 du/acre, 10 bldgs.
w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo (2, 3, 6),
podium construction (type III), 5-story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment (2, 7), 250 units,
garden style, 3 story bldg., type V
construction, surface parking, 10
buildings on 10 acres
Valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Client provides valuation Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check $2,870.18 $3,370.84 $13,214.06 $6,757.58
Master/Subsequent Check Fee $173.02/hour $173.02/hour $173.02/hour $173.02/hour Building Permit $2,870.18 $3,370.84 $13,214.06 $6,757.58 MPE Permits (4) $1,072.30 $7,870.00 $133,400.20 $15,710.20 Energy
Fire Plan Check $574 $2,620 $2,374 $3,111
CBSC Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Inspection fee $173.02/hour $173.02/hour $173.02/hour $173.02/hour License fee
Seismic Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Valuation Dependent Subtotal $6,812.66 $14,611.68 $162,202.32 $29,225.36
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Water Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Paid to Water District Public Facilities (PF) $6,923 $6,243 $6,243 $6,243
Traffic $3,808 $2,435 $2,435 $2,435
Traffic Signal $402 $252 $252 $252
Parks $8,334 $7,598 $7,598 $7,598
Fire/EMS
Police
Library
Drainage/Flood $3,093 $2,115 $2,115 $2,115
School Contact School District Contact School District Contact School District Contact School District Inclusionary Housing
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG(RTCIP) $2,583.82 $2,583.82 $2,583.82 $2,583.82 Total Cost $31,956.48 $35,080.30 (5) $176,990.08 (6) $49,323.44 (7) Comments:
(1) SFD based on IBC Class R-3 Dwellings- Production Phase - 2700 square feet, 600 SF garage, 240 SF covered wooden patio; fireplace, gas & electrical. (2) Condo and Apartment Units assume 1 bed and 1 bath per unit. (3) Assumption that all of the Condo units are in one building. (5) Fees are based on structure, not units. 10 units/building (6) Fee for all 250 in one building
(7) Fees are based on structure, not units. Assuming 25 units/building Santee - Residential
(4) MPE Assumptions (Per Unit): 3 fixtures per full bathroom, 2 fixtures per half bathroom, 8 20A ciruits+ 1 30A circuit; 3 gas fixtures; 1 Sewer Line per building, 1 HVAC - AC Residential/furnace per unit, 1 Permit Issuance Fee.
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 38 Permit Issuance Fee SFD
MFU 100 Townhome (*), 100 units
w/attached garages, type V construction at
18 du/acre, 10 bldgs. w/10 units each
MFU 250 Unit Condo(*), podium
construction (type III), 5-story,
underground parking, 1.5-2 acre site
Apartment (*), 250 units, garden
style, 3 story bldg., type V construction,
surface parking, 10 buildings on 10
acres
Valuation $354,255.00 $19,289,600.00 $23,475,500.00 $26,842,250.00 Valuation Year 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020-2021
Permit Fees
Plan Check $2,718.25 $22,214.50 $27,028.40 $30,900.45
Master/Subsequent Check Fee
Building Permit $4,040.85 $158,410.90 $192,777.96 $220,421.03 MPE Permits
Energy
Fire Plan Check $516.47 $4,220.76 $5,135.40 $5,871.09
CBSC
Inspection fee
License fee
State Revolving Fee $15 $772 $940 $1,074
Seismic $46.05 $2,507.65 $3,051.82 $3,489.49
Subtotal $7,336.62 $188,125.81 $228,933.58 $261,756.06
Impact/Capacity Fees
Sewer (1) $4,835 $483,500 $1,208,750 $846,125
Water
Public Facilities (PF) $1,218 $121,800 $304,500 $304,500 Traffic (incl signal) $2,816.13 $270,349 $675,872.50 $675,872.50 Parks $7,961.56 $790,164 $1,975,410 $1,975,410
Fire/EMS $379 $37,900 $94,750 $94,750
Police
Library
Drainage/Flood (2) $427.25 $30,762 $2,563.50 $17,090.00 School
Inclusionary Housing
Special District Fee
IT Improvement
MSCP
Stormwater
Traffic SANDAG $2,816.13 $180,232 $450,580 $450,580
Traffic SR-78
Aerial Aparatus fee(3) $108,750 $79,166.66
Total $27,789.69 $2,102,832.81 $5,050,109.58 $4,705,250.22 Cost Per Unit $21,028.33 $20,200.44 $18,821.00
Comments:
(*) Valuation/Fees were reported based per builidng. We have taken those figures and applied it to the entire project, therefore fees are reported entirely in the TOTAL section. (2) Fee based on drainage basin - $1709-$3700 per acre. (3) Aerial Apparatus fee
Vista - Residential
(1) Vista is served by two sewer districts: Vista Sanitation $4,835. per EDU and Buena Sanitation - $6,192 per EDU. In this scenario, Vista Santiation is the sewer district. Please check to see which district your project is located in.
39 42
S u b d i v i s i o n F e e s
40 AGENCY IMPERIAL BEACH LEMON GROVE CHULA VISTA NATIONAL CITY Grading Plan Check Included in Grading Permit
Full Cost Recovery, Initial Deposit:
< 1,000 CY = $6,000; 1,001-10,000 CY = $12,000;
10,001 - 100,000 CY = $15,000; > 100,000 CY
$20,000
Actual cost with an initial deposit equal to 3%
of engineers cost estimate or $5,000 which
ever is greater
Grading Permit Min = $2,500 Dep
Maj = $7,000 Dep
Full Cost Recovery, Initial Depsit:
< 1,000 CY = $3,000; 1,001-10,000 CY = $6,000;
10,001 - 100,000 CY = $15,000; > 100,000 CY
$20,000
$396
Improvement Plan Check
1-4 DU = $2,500 Dep
5-25 DU = $7,000 Dep
Over 25 DU = $15,000 Dep
Valuation < $10,000 = $290;
> $10,000 = Full Cost Recovery, Initial Deposit:
$10,001-$100,000 = $4,500; $100,001-$500,000 =
$15,000; >$500,000 = $20,000
Initial deposit equal to 3% of engineers cost
estimate or $5,000 which ever is greater
Improvement Inspection $500
Valuation < $10,000 = $680;
> $10,000 = Full Cost Recovery, Initial Deposit:
$10,001-$100,000 = $4,000; $100,001-$500,000 =
$15,000; >$500,000 = $20,000
Actual cost (time and material)
Geotechnical/Soils Review Actual cost included in plan check fee Landscaping Plan Check $150 Dep Minor $330, Major $2,035 Actual cost included in plan check fee Stormwater $150 Dep Minimum of $5,000 deposit
SUBDIVISION PROCESSING FEES
MINOR SUBDIVISION IMPERIAL BEACH LEMON GROVE CHULA VISTA NATIONAL CITY Annex N/A N/A
Full Cost Recovery
Deposit of $4,000 <20 acres; $6,000 21-100 acres;
$10,000 > 100 acres
$9,940
Compliance N/A $150 Dep $100 $2,690
Design Review (DR) N/A N/A
Full Cost Recovery
Admin $10,000 Deposit; Publ. Hearing $20,000
Deposit
Development Agreement N/A $500 Dep Full Cost Recovery
General Plan Ammendment Full Cost Recovery, $5,000 Dep $3,000 Dep Full Cost Recovery, $20,000 Deposit $9,940 Tenative Parcel Map Full Cost Recovery, $2,500 $3,000 Dep Full Cost Recovery, $5,000 Deposit $6,500 Final Map Full Cost Recovery, $2,000 $6,000 Dep Full Cost Recovery, <50 Lots $7,500 Deposit, >50 Lots $15,000 Deposit
Actual cost with minimum:
Parcel Map $5,000 Deposit
Subdivision Map $10,000 Deposit
Planned Development (PRD) N/A $2,000 Dep Full Cost Recovery, $20,000 Deposit $7,890 Planned Development (PCD) N/A $2,000 Dep Full Cost Recovery, $20,000 Deposit Rezone Full Cost Recovery, $3,000 $1,000 Dep Full Cost Recovery, $10,000 Deposit $9,940 Sensitive Land/Resources N/A N/A Full Cost Recovery, $7,500 Deposit Special Use Permit (major CUP) Full Cost Recovery, $2,000 $1,500 Dep Full Cost Recovery, $10,000 Deposit $7,890 Site Development Plan Full Cost Recovery, $3,000 $150 Dep $2,300 $2,840 Specific Plan Full Cost Recovery $3,000 Dep Full Cost Recovery, $20,000 Deposit $9,940 Variance Full Cost Recovery, $1,800 Dep $750 Dep Full Cost Recovery, $9,000 Deposit $8,020 MAJOR SUBDIVISION - ASSUME 50 LOTS ON 10 ACRES
MAJOR SUBDIVISION IMPERIAL BEACH LEMON GROVE CHULA VISTA NATIONAL CITY Tentative Map Full Cost Recovery, $3,000 Dep $4,500 Dep Full Cost Recovery, $10,000 Deposit $9,940 Final Map Full Cost Recovery, $2,000 Dep $12,000 Dep Full Cost Recovery, $7,500 Deposit Actual Cost (time and material) Environmental Initial Study Full Cost Recovery, $3,000 Dep Included Full Cost Recovery, $10,000 Deposit $7,270 Environmental Impact Report Full Cost Recovery, $8,000 Dep Prepared by Developer Full Cost Recovery, $20,000 Deposit Other
South County Subdivision/Engineering Fees
ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS (PROJECT)
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 41 East County Subdivision/Engineering Fees
ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS (PROJECT)
AGENCY EL CAJON SANTEE LA MESA
Grading Plan Check
5% of the first $50K, of est. site improvements
costs plus 3% of the costs between $50K and
$100K; 2% of the costs between $100,000 and
$250,000; 1% of the costs above $250,000
min. of $1,000
$5,500 Deposit-full cost recovery $1,167 for 2 sheets + $507 each additional sheet. $1,061 or 10% Eng. Est.
Grading Permit N/A No Additional Charge $7,781
Improvement Plan Check
6.5% of 1st $50K, of est. site improvements
costs; 4% of costs between $50K and $100K;
1.5% of costs between %100K and 250K and
1% of the costs > $250K, with a $1K min. 1%
of est. for each review after 3
$4,000 Deposit-full cost recovery 10% of EoR Cost Estimate (P) | $444 or 4% EoR cost estimate (Q)
Improvement Inspection 3.5% of the est. cost of construction (min. $500) (Soil Testing not included) $3,000 Deposit-full cost recovery $772 or 5.5% EoR cost estimate Geotechnical/Soils Review N/A $1,000 Deposit-full cost recovery $159 Landscaping Plan Check N/A N/A
Stormwater N/A N/A 4% of EoR Cost Estimate
SUBDIVISION PROCESING FEES
MINOR SUBDIVISION EL CAJON SANTEE LA MESA
Annex $2,120 per acre N/A $10,193
Compliance $1,150 $350/$2,500 with boundary adj. $1,240 Design Review (DR) N/A $4,500 $1,602 small; $2,755 large Development Agreement $10,000 Deposit $10,000 deposit
General Plan Ammendment $3,680 $13,000 Deposit $12,898
Tentative Parcel Map $3,885 + $26/lot $10,000 Deposit $4,967 Final Map N/A Deposit $1,000/Sheet $4,107 + $316 per lot Planned Development (PRD) $7,100 N/A $4,567
Planned Development (PCD) $7,100 N/A
Rezone $4,335 $10,000 Deposit $11,668
Sensitive Land/Resources N/A 4D/rule determination $1,500 Special Use Permit (major CUP) $5,525 $4,500 Deposits $3,518 Site Development Plan $4,095 N/A $1,191, $3,171, $4,149 Specific Plan $6,260 $10,000 Deposit $12,898
Variance $1,075 $2,500 Deposit $1,777 small; $3,495 large MAJOR SUBDIVISION - ASSUME 50 LOTS ON 10 ACRES
MINOR SUBDIVISION EL CAJON SANTEE LA MESA
Tentative Map $6,355 + $74/lot $16,000 Deposit $6,416 (P) | $1,131 (Q) Final Map N/A $1,000/sheet
Environmental Initial Study $5,355 + $263/each req'd report (up to 2 reviews) $386 $888 + $1,950
Environmental Impact Report 10,000 Deposit $20,000 Deposit $7,048 Other $6,500 Design Review $541 + $1,480 extended IS
Comments:
(P) Planning Department
(Q) Engineering Department
Refer to page 1 for all category assumptions for this survey 42 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS (PROJECT)
AGENCY CARLSBAD ENCINITAS OCEANSIDE
Grading Plan Check $2,008 (1) $1,747/sheet Based on Cost Estimate Grading Permit $1,055 (1) 5% of approved construction estimate $1,550 Improvement Plan Check $31,630 (2) $2,230/sheet Based on Cost Estimate Improvement Inspection $17,806 (2) 5% of approved construction estimate Based on Cost Estimate Geotechnical/Soils Review $1200 (4) included $378
Landscaping Plan Check Flat fee plus % based on total valuation $168/sheet private; $348/sheet public $3,432 Stormwater
SWQMP Review (5,7): $1543; SWQMP inspection
(5,7): $1,404; Grading SWPPP review (5): $1,741;
Grading SWPPP inspection (5): $5,664; Building
review/inspection (5): $3,040
SWPPP $830; $168/sheet; NPDES Inspection (NI &
NG) ≤ $100,000 ACE - 1% of ACE; NPDES
Inspection (NI & NG) > $100,000 ACE - $1,000 plus
0.6% of ACE; SWCSM Minor Revision -$1,392;
SWCSM Major Revision -$2,330
Deposit $4,000
SUBDIVISION PROCESING FEES
MINOR SUBDIVISION CARLSBAD ENCINITAS OCEANSIDE
Annex $1,851 $3,430
Coastal Development Permit (Minor) $938 $1600 (8)
Certificate of Compliance $1,144 $670 Deposit
Design Review (DR) $1,275 staff review, $2,750 to $4,800 Planning Commission review
Development Agreement Deposit $10,000 increments Cost + 50% overhead; initial deposit $13,000 to $20,000 Deposit
General Plan Ammendment 0-5 acres = $4,677; over 5 acres = $6,747 Cost + 50% overhead; initial deposit $13,000 to $20,000 Deposit
Tentative Parcel Map $4,169 $4555 (9) Deposit
Final Map $3,678 $355 (Planning); $2,400/sheet (Engineering) (9) Deposit Planned Development (PRD) 4 or less units = $3,304; 5 or more = $9,161 $6,000 Planned Development (PCD) 4 or less units = $3,304; 5 or more = $9,161 $6,000 Rezone 0-5 acres = $5,373; 5.1 or more acres = $7,279 Cost + 50% overhead; initial deposit $20,000 $7,424 Sensitive Land/Resources/HMP 4283 (6)
Special Use Permit (major CUP) SUP: $3,757 (Major CUP: $4,913) $6,000 Deposit Site Development Plan 4 or less units = $4,895; 5 or more = $12,416 $6,435 Specific Plan $38,247 Cost + 50% overhead; initial deposit $13,000 to $20,000 Deposit
Variance $3,098 $1,580 staff review; $1,865 to $3,810 Planning Commission review $4,000
MAJOR SUBDIVISION CARLSBAD ENCINITAS OCEANSIDE
Tentative Map $18,043 $13,000 + $650/lot (10) Deposit
Final Map $8,193 $520 (Planning); $2,112/sheet (Engineering) (10) Deposit Environmental Initial Study $1,894 $5,055 (in-house), $1,055 contract admin + 3rd-party cost (external) Deposit
Environmental Impact Report $21,982 (11) $4,485 contract admin + 3rd-party cost Deposit Other (4)
Comments:
(1) Grading fees based on quantity. Assumed 1,000 cy of material. (2) Improvements assume a minimum fee for estimates over $1,000,001. (3) GIS
(4) Costs generally included unless 3rd party review req'd by City Engineer. 3rd party cost covered by applicant with deposit. (5) Stormwater fees vary depending on acreage, storm water priority. Contact city for more specifics. Costs assuming using prototype project information. (6) Varies depending on scope. Cost assumes impact to existing habitat to be preserved. Contact city for more specifics. (7) Project assumes a priority development project (PDP) for water quality purposes. Contact city for more specifics. (8) City does not have a Coastal Development Permit (Minor) but does have a Coastal Development Permit (9) Minor Subdivisions involve 2-4 lots
(10) Major Subdivisions involve 5+ lots
(11) Review fee (+ fully burdened hourly rate after first 160 hours of project planner, or 40 hours of project engineer). Review of EIR only.
North Coastal Subdivision/Engineering Fees
MAJOR SUBDIVISION - ASSUME 50 LOTS ON 10 ACRES
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 43 North Inland Cities Subdivision/Engineering Fees
ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS (PROJECT)**
AGENCY ESCONDIDO POWAY SAN MARCOS VISTA
Grading Plan Check $750 per shr. $2,500 min. $1,367 - $10,000 (deposit)* $2,630 $3,261 - $15,434 Grading Permit $265 $264 $829 $2,834 - $8,594
Improvement Plan Check $1,500 min. $1,128 min - $5,000 (deposit)* $25,325 $3,544 - $15,866 Improvement Inspection $1,000 min. $659 min - $15,000 (deposit) * $37,500 $1,378 - $7,597 Geotechnical/Soils Review
Landscaping Plan Check $1,040 min. $720 min.* 2% cost est. $1,320 Other Stormwater Inspection: $1,054 Landscape inspection: 2.5% cost estimate
Stormwater Review for Priority Project:
$6,800
Comments:
* Fees are tiered and based on project cost estimates.
**Each figure above is a fee unless specically indicated.
SUBDIVISION PROCESSING FEES
MINOR SUBDIVISION ESCONDIDO POWAY SAN MARCOS VISTA
Annex $3,740 + $790/DU N/A $1,500 $6,958
Compliance $815 $770 $750 $597
Design Review (DR) $450 minor, $985 MASR $1,622
Development Agreement Cost Recovery + Noticing $3,000 $2,500 + Legal Cost General Plan Ammendment < 5 ac = $5185 $1,917 $2,500 $9,284 Tenative Parcel Map $2,635 $2,711 $2,090 $3,138
Final Map $995 + $1,000 + $50/lot $1,100/sht $800 + $40/lot $3,117 Planned Development (PRD) Master plan: $5,940 / Precise plan:
$3,150 $1,917 $3,476 $6,539
Planned Development (PCD) Same as (PRD) $1,917
Rezone < 5 ac = $3,900; > 5 ac + $5,100 $1,917 $872 $8,855 Special Use Permit (major CUP) $4,915 major, $2,175 minor $1,597 $3,476 $6,958 Site Development Plan $2,540 major; $1,025 minor N/A $2,470 $6,520 Specific Plan Cost Recovery + Noticing $5,479 $2,860 $12,195 Variance Single family: $1,825 / Other: $2,030 $319 $200 sfr $2,196 Other $564
MAJOR SUBDIVISION - ASSUME 50 LOTS ON 10 ACRES
MAJOR SUBDIVISION ESCONDIDO POWAY SAN MARCOS VISTA
Tentative Map $4,790 $4,174 $2,690 + $50/lot $9,558
Final Map $995 + $1,000/sht + $50/lot $1,100 per sht $800 + $40/lot $5,723 Environmental Initial Study $2,405 $635 $3,720 $9,196
Environmental Impact Report $3,120 + $234 per tech. study $5,000 Cost + 25% Cost + 20% Other CA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Fee
ND: $2,216.25 / EIR: $3,078.25
CA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Fee
ND: $2,354.75 / EIR: $3,271
CA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Fee
ND: $2,216.25 / EIR: $3,078.25
CA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Fee
ND/MND: $1,877 / EIR: $2,607
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 44 47
S e w e r F e e s
45 2021 Sewer District Fees
Fees SFD APT TWNHM CONDO SFD APT TWNHM CONDO SFD APT TWNHM CONDO Capacity $6,405 $4,483.50 $6,405 $6,405 $3,417 $3,417 $3,417 $3,417 $982 Inspection
Application
Installation
Annexation Fee
Densification
Other $40 (12) $40 (12) $40 (12) $40 (12) $1,726
Total $6,405 $4,483.50 $6,405 $6,405 $3,457 $3,457 $3,457 $3,457 $2,708 Fees SFD APT TWNHM CONDO SFD APT TWNHM CONDO SFD APT TWNHM CONDO Capacity $2,680 $2,680 $2,680 $2,680 $7,500 $5,625 (2) $7,500 $7,500 (2) $7,115 $5,692 $5,692 $5,692 Inspection
Application
Installation
Annexation Fee
Densification
Other $40 (10) $40 (10) $40 (10) $40 (10) $23.27 (14) $23.27 (14) $23.27 (14) $23.27 (14) Total $2,720 $2,720 $2,720 $2,720 $7,523.27 $5,648.27 $7,523.27 $5,648.27 $7,115 $5,641 $5,641 $5,641 Fees SFD (A) APT (B) TWNHM (B) CONDO (B) SFD (A) APT (C) TWNHM (C) CONDO (C) SFD APT TWNHM CONDO Capacity $3,509 $35,090 $35,090 $3,509 $5,089 $5,089 $5,089 $5,089 $1,930 $1,450.00 $1,450.00 $1,930.00 Inspection
Application
Installation
Annexation Fee
Densification
Other $363.90 $159,225 $63,690 $159,225
Total $4,128.10 $194,315 $98,780 $162,815 $5,089 $5,089 $5,089 $5,089 $1,930 $1,450.00 $1,450.00 $1,930.00 Fees SFD (A) APT (B) TWNHM (B) CONDO (B) SFD (A) APT (A) TWNHM CONDO SFD APT TWNHM CONDO Capacity $7,794 $623,540.00 $389,710.00 $116,914.00 $2,330 $2,330 -$11 $11 $8,336.44 (11) (11) (11) Inspection
Application
Installation
Annexation Fee $8,560 $8,560
Densification
Other
Total $7,794 $623,540.00 $389,710.00 $116,914.00 $10,890 $10,890 $8,336.44 Fees SFD (C) APT (C) TWNHM (C) CONDO (C) SFD (A) APT (A) TWNHM (A) CONDO (A) SFD APT TWNHM CONDO Capacity $3,804 $2,536 $3,112 $3,112
SM $15,379.09;
SV $15,005.59
SM $15,379.09;
SV $15,005.59
SM $15,379.09;
SV $15,005.59
SM $15,379.09;
SV $15,005.59 $16,951 $11,301 $14,126 $11,301
Inspection
Application
Installation
Annexation Fee
Densification
Other $3,072 $2,048 $2,513 $2,513
SM $821.57; SV
$779.75 (13)
SM $821.57; SV
$779.75 (13)
SM $821.57; SV
$779.75 (13)
SM $821.57; SV
$779.75 (13) $1,100 (5) $1,100 (5) $1,100 (5) $1,100 (5) Total $6,876 $4,584 $5,625 $5,625
SM $16,200.66;
SV $15,785.34
SM $16,200.66;
SV $15,785.34
SM $16,200.66;
SV $15,785.34
SM $16,200.66;
SV $15,785.34 $18,051 $12,401 $15,226 $12,401
Refer to page 49 for all footnotes for sewer district fees Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey Leucadia WD National City (6)
Fallbrook PUD (C, 20,21)
Lemon Grove SD (16)
Padre Dam MWD (19) Ramona MWD (12) Rainbow MWD
City of Oceanside Olivenhain MWD (1) Otay WD
Buena CSD Cardiff SD (C)
Encinitas SD (C)
Carlsbad MWD (7)
Escondido UWD (C)
46 Sewer Districts (con't)
Fees SFD (A) APT (A) TWNHM (A) CONDO (A) SFD (A) APT (C) TWNHM (C) CONDO (C) SFD (3a) APT (3b) TWNHM
(3c)
CONDO
(3b) SFD APT TWNHM CONDO
Capacity $4,124 $3,402.30 $3,670 $2,474.40 $13,051 $9,396.72 $9,657.74 $9,396.72 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $5,327 $3,728.90 $5,327 $5,327 Inspection
.
$1,400 $1,400
(17)
$1,400
(18)
$1,400
(17)
Application
Installation
Annexation Fee
Densification
Other $25 (8) $25 (8) $25 (8) $25 (8)
Total $4,149 $3,427.30 $3,695.36 $2,499.40 $13,051 $9,396.72 $9,657.74 $9,396.72 $10,335 $10,335 $10,335 $10,335 $5,327 $3,728.90 $5,327 $5,327 Comments:
(A) Costs quoted are per EDU.
(B) Costs are quoted per project based on scenario on page 3 (C) Costs quoted as per unit
(1) Pricing is for 4S Ranch.
(2) Units with 3 or more bedrooms are charged $7,500 per unit. Units with less than 3 bedrooms are charged $5,625. (3a) Connection fee=$150, Inspection Deposit=$1,250 (refunded after scheduling inspection and inspection is completed without additional cost. (5) Other charge = cost for each sewer lateral connection. SFD = 1.2 EDU, Apartment =.8 EDU, Townhome = 1.0 EDU, Condo =.8 EDU (5a) 1.2 EDU for SFD; .8 EDU per unit for Scenarios B-D (6) For Apartment projects the fee is $1,160/1 bdrm; $1,450/2bdrm; $1,930/3 bdrm with an additional $480/ea. Add'l bdrm. National City has a formula for their sewer capacity on City's website. (7) District has 13 benefit areas with varifying costs per EDU. (8) Inspection Connection Fee
(9) District reported fees on SFD as/lot. On Multi-family scenarios, fees reported as/DU. (10) District charges a $40 processing fee per permit.
(11) District does not anticipate a multifamily development of this size in our sewer service area. Did not report costs for these scenarios. (13) Pro-rated yearly service charge.
(14) Wastewater service monthly charge - per unit.
(15) Annual sewer service fee.
(16) Fees reported for scenarios B, C, & D, are for the entire assumed project. (17) Total cost per building.
(18) Cost per building.
(19) Other charge is to send waste to San Diego Metro treatment plany for disposal (20) Annexation to the District is $11,389.
(21)Lateral installation fee-- ≤ 15’ Length, ≤ 8’ Depth $ 3,500; ≤ 15’ Length, > 8’ Depth $ 5,422; > 15’- 30’ Length, ≤ 8’ Depth $ 7,443; > 15’- 30’ Length, > 8’ Depth $ 9,586; > 30’ Length, Any Depth $ T&M; County Road Inspection fee $ 1,402; Paving ≤ 15’ $ 1,470; Paving 16'-30’$ 2,462 Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 2021 Sewer District Fees
City of San Diego Vallecitos WD (9) Valley Center MWD (A,3) Vista CSD (3) The District has 2 sewer service areas, the LMCWRF (Lower Moosa Canyon Water Reclamation Facility) and the WVRWRF (Woods Valley Ranch Water Reclamation Racility). Capacity fees shown are for the District's LMCWRF Service Area. Capacity fees and charges for the District's WVRWRF Severice Area would be on a project by project basis. This facility has no additional capacity available in the WVRWRF at this time. A facility expansion would be required to provide additional sewer service. Multi-family units are currently assigned a 1 EDU capacity requirement.
(12) District is split into SM=Santa Maria and SV=San Vincente. (4) Listed amount is for a single 4 inch meter. Additional meters may be required as determined by the Engineer of work. Padre Dam capacity fee would remain the same regardless of the number of meters.
(3b) $1,400 represents total connection charge for apartment complex or one condominium building. Assumes all apartment buildings connceted to private sewer within the complex and one connection to the District's system. Connection Fee: $150; Inspection Deposit: $1,250 (refunded after scheduling inspection and inspection is completed without additional cost). (3c) $1,400 represents total connection charge for each building. Assumes all Townhome buildings connected to private building sewer within one connection to the District's system for each building. Connection Fee: $150; Inspection Deposit: $1,250 (refunded after scheduling inspection and inspection is completed without additional cost). 47 50
W a t e r F e e s
48 Fees SFD APT TWNHM CONDO SFD (B,18) APT (B,18) TWNHM (B,7b) CONDO (B,7a) SFD (B,14) APT (B,19) TWNHM (B,19) CONDO (B,19) Capacity $5,516 $4,455 $28,514 $75,041 $48,241 $7,930 $877,500 $351,000 $46,780 SDCWA capacity $5,312 $27,622 $87,117 $50,995 $8,482 $86,936 $86,936 $50,890 SDCWA Treatment $148 $770 $5,437 $2,457
Hook-on Fee
Lateral Fee
Installation $4,100.22 $4,550 $14,833 $14,833 $12,983
Meter Cost $35.12 $500
Annexation Fee
Other
Total $9,651.34 $9,915 $56,906 $167,595 $101,693 $21,462 $979,269 $452,769 $110,653 Fees SFD APT TWNHM CONDO SFD (A) APT (17) (B) TWNHM (14)(B) CONDO (26)(B) SFD APT (B) TWNHM (B) CONDO (B) Capacity $5,778 $94,770 $94,770 $55,477 $6,953 $44,036 $11,588 $27,812 $4,387 $312,500 $135,000 $377,500 SDCWA capacity $5,460 $89,544 $89,544 $52,416 $5,448 $28,329 $8,717 $16,344 $5,460 $89,544 $89,544 $52,416 SDCWA Treatment $147
Hook-on Fee
Lateral Fee $10,000 (5) $10,000 (5) $10,000 (5) $10,000 (5) $7,270 $18,000 (30) $18,000 (30) $18,000 (30) Installation
Meter Cost $270/$370 (25)
Annexation Fee $3,279 (15)
Other $306 (13) $865 (13) $353 (13) $655 (13)
Total $11,238 $184,314 $184,314 $107,893 $22,707 $82,230 $30,658 $54,811 $17,264 $420,044 $242,544 $407,916 Fees SFD APT TWNHM CONDO SFD APT TWNHM CONDO SFD (B,7) APT (B, 7b) TWNHM (B,7a) CONDO (B,7b) Capacity $9,138 $1,919 $3,061 $351 $10,399 $7,279 $11,128.79 $278,219.75 $178,060.64 $278,219.75 SDCWA capacity $5,448 $1,133.16 $1,634.40 $209.21 $5,460 $5,460 $5,312 $87,117 $50,995 $87,117 SDCWA Treatment $146 $95.70 $238.90 $55.40 $148 $2,427 $1,421 $2,427 Hook-on Fee
Lateral Fee
Installation $650 $600 $112.51 $677.43 $677.43 $677.43
Meter Cost $615 $174.30 $435.70 $105.60 $305.96 $3,862.73 $2,220.66 $3,862.73 Annexation Fee $2,011.70 $52,792.50 $33,787.20 $52,792.50 Other 95.52 (6) $3,862.73 (6) $3,862.73 (6) $3,862.73(6) Total $15,347 $3,323 $5,370 $722 $16,509 $13,339 $19,214.48 $428,959.14 $271,024.66 $428,959.14 Fees SFD (A) APT (B) TWNHM (B) CONDO(B,4) SFD APT (B) TWNHM (B,17) CONDO (B,7b) SFD (A) APT (B) TWNHM (B) CONDO (B) Capacity $9,002 $1,856,750.00 $832,700 $2,081,750 $10,401 $208,020 $62,406 $208,020 $8,740 TBD $874,000 TBD SDCWA capacity $5,460 $89,544 $89,544 $89,544 $5,460 $89,544 $28,392 $89,347 $5,448 $89,347 $89,347 $52,301 SDCWA Treatment
Hook-on Fee
Lateral Fee
Installation $3,095 $3,949 $3,949 $3,949
Meter Cost
Annexation Fee
Other $1,325 $2,475 $1,685 $2,475
Total $14,462 $1,946,294 $922,244 $2,171,294 $17,186 $300,039 $92,483 $299,842 $17,283 $93,296 $967,296 $56,250 Fees SFD (A) APT (B) TWNHM (B) CONDO (B) SFD (A) APT (B) TWNHM (B) CONDO (B) SFD APT TWNHM CONDO Capacity $5,992 $149,809 $149,809 $95,877 $3,047 $628,443.75 $271,173 $457,050.00 $3,300 $54,120 $54,120 $31,680 SDCWA capacity $5,460 $89,544 $89,544 $52,416 $5,448 $89,339 $89,339 $52,296 $5,413 $88,772 $88,772 $51,964 SDCWA Treatment
Hook-on Fee
Lateral Fee
Installation $110.00 $7,291.08 $7,291.08 $443.00 $925 (8) (8) (8) Meter Cost
Annexation Fee
Other $2,435 $2,435 $2,435 $2,435 $254 (29) $318 (29) $318 (29) $508 (29) $2,150 (11) Total $13,887 $235,745 $241,788 $235,745 $8,859 $725,391.83 $367,803.08 $509,789.00 $11,788 $142,892 $142,892 $83,644 All fee totals are the calcuated cost, based on the page 3 assumptions PER PROJECT , please refer to issues identified & noted in the footnotes Refer to page 53 for all footnotes for water district fees Lakeside WD
Rincon Del Diablo (8, 8a) City of San Diego San Dieguito WD (23, 24) Helix WD (D)
Padre Dam MWD Rainbow MWD Ramona MWD
Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey 2021 Water District Fees
Borrego WD (16)
Fallbrook PUD (E)
Otay WD
Carlsbad MWD
Olivenhain MWD (1, 1a)
Escondido UWD
City of Oceanside (C,28)
49 Water Districts (con't)
Fees SFD APT (B,8) TWNHM (B,8) CONDO (B) SFD (C) APT (B) TWNHM (B) CONDO (B) SFD (C) APT (C) TWNHM (C) CONDO (C) Capacity $17,636 $587,867 $587,867 $235,147 $5,778 $663,380 $323,600 $663,380 $7,935 $3,808.00 $4,443.60 $3,174.00 SDCWA capacity $5,460 $89,455 $89,544 $52,416 $5,460 $89,544 $89,544 $52,416 $5,460 $909 $1,136 $795 SDCWA Treatment
Hook-on Fee
Lateral Fee
Installation $3,570 (10) $6,215 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8)
Meter Cost
Annexation Fee
Other $170 (11) $170 (11) $170 (11) $181 (27) $5.79 (27) $7.24 (27) $5.07 (27) Total $26,836 $677,492 $677,492 $293,778 $11,238 $752,924 $413,144 $715,796 $13,576 $4,722.33 $5,586.52 $3,974.05 Fees SFD (C,9a) APT (C,9) TWNHM (C,9) CONDO (C,9) SFD (21) APT (22) TWNHM (22) CONDO (22) SFD (18) APT (12) TWNHM (12) CONDO (12) Capacity $4,950 $3,300 $3,300 $3,300 $10,514 $420 $1,051 $269 $3,002 SDCWA capacity $5,460 $5,460 $5,460 $5,460 $5,460 $358 $895 $209 $5,312 SDCWA Treatment $148
Hook-on Fee $795 21a 21a 21a
Lateral Fee $4,975 21a 21a 21a
Installation $4,095
Meter Cost
Annexation Fee
Other $2,400 (2) $1,433 $1,433 $1,433
Total $12,810 $10,193 $10,193 $10,193 $21,744 $778 $1,946 $478 $12,557 2020 Water District Fees
Sweetwater Authority
Refer to page 53 for all footnotes for water district fees Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey Santa Fe Irrigation (3)
Valley Center MWD Vista Irrigation (C) Yuima MWD
Vallecitos WD
All fee totals are the calcuated either per-unit cost or per scenario cost from page 3, unless otherwise noted in 50 Refer to page 3 for all category assumptions for this survey Comments:
(A) Costs quoted are per EDU.
(B) Costs are quoted per project based on scenario on page 3 (C) Costs reported as per unit, based on scenarios on page 3 (D) District reported meter sizes as follows: SFD-3/4"; APT-2"; TWNHM-1"; Condo-1.5" Recommend call District with project specific questions (1) Pricing is for Area B, 4S Ranch.
(1a) District did not report Townhome or Condo project costs. (2) Includes charges for ¾ inch meter drop in, ¾ inch backflow device, separate 1 inch fire service meter; assumes service lateral installed with subdivision improvements. (6) New meter box fee.
(7a) Fees based on 3" standard water meter.
(7b) Fees based on 4" standard water meter.
(8) Installation charge based on actual costs incurred (time & materials). (8a) Other Fees/Charges includes $320 for the cost of the meter & setting it and $2,115 for the cost to install the water service by District staff. (10) Fire Sprinklers (Meter size accomodates fire sprinklers). (11) Other fees / charges are for: Meter installation fee - $925; Plan check fee - $2,150 - Inspection fees (varies with value of improvements) (12) District does not anticipate this type of development. (13) connection estimate fees.
(14) Fees based on a 1" meter.
(15) $3,279 fee charged per acre.
(16) Borrego WD did not participate in this year's survey. Fees are reported from 2015-2016 Survey. (17) Fees based on a 2" meter.
(20) Fees reported for scenarios B, C, & D, are for the entire assumed project. (21) Fire dept. and VID approval for 1" meter upsized solely for fire protection on SFD. Other fees may apply dependent upon project requirements and improvements. (21a) Meter hanging and lateral installations are on a time & materilas basis (22) Apt and Twnhm scenarios projected on a 4" meter, Condo on a 3" meter (24) Fire line capacity fee varies based on size of the fire line. Contact district for more information. (25) $270 for 3/4"; $370 for 1"
(26) Fees based on a 1.5" meter.
(27) District charges for meter transmitter units that are installed on each meter for remote reading. (29) wet tap fee
(30) Service Lateral Deposit plus meter set = $18,000. Does not include backflow assembly installation. 2020 Water District Fees
(28) Scenario B: assumes ten 4" meters; Scenario C: assumes ten 4" meters; Scenario D: assumes ten 3" meters (4) Listed amount is for a single 4" meter. Additional meters may be required as determined by the Engineer of work. Padre Dam capacity fee would remain the same regardless of the number of meters.
(5) Approximate lateral installation cost. Service installation will require the District to perform an estimate to establish a deposit. Call district for details. (9) Assumes installation of a separate 5/8 inch meter for each apartment, condominium or townhome, a common fire service meter service for each building and a separate irrigation meter for common areas. Connection and capacity charges for fire service and irrigation meters have not been included. The SDCWA does not provide capacity charges for less than ¾ inch meter sizes, ¾ inch meter charges were used for the SDCWA capacity charges shown.
Water Districts (con't)
(9a) Engineering and processing fees for review and approval of a 50 lot, 10 acre subdivision w/100,000 CY of grading would be on a cost basis. The developer would post a plan review deposit and provide additional funding as needed for plan review, approval processing and inspection. (3) District capacity fees are based on the meter size, not the number of dwelling units. Determining the fees depends on how big the meter needs to be to supply the building or buildings.
(7) Jurisdiction requires fire sprinklers. Fixture unit count confirms a 3/4" is adequate. Meter upsize to a 1" meter due to fire sprinkler requirements. 1" meter sold at 3/4" District and SDCWA capacity fees.
(23) SFD scenarios assume a 3/4" domestic and 1" meter for fire sprinklers. Townhome & Condo scenario assumes this 4" meter meter setup for each of the 10 buildings.
Apartment assumes 3" meter. Fees reported for 1 building. (19) For this scenario, the recommended meter size was used, however, the jurisdiction typically sees a different water meter set‐ups for these types of scenarios. Sometimes one master meter that is sub‐metered behind the master meter, or 1"‐2" meter serving each building.
E District reports the following costs on SDF: Svc Line- $2318; Paving < 15’ - $1807 Paving > 15’ - $3615; County Insp/Public Rd - $1402; RP install w/meter - $475 MF scenarios T&M for same items. (18) Fees based on 3/4" meter for SFD; for Apts-Assume 2” water meter per building. See Notes (1) & (2)--(1) Fees are based on meter size, so dwelling unit fees are determined by taking the total fee divided by the total number of proposed units. (2) Total fees provided are for the entire proposed development, and assume a 1.5” or 2” meter for each of the 10 buildings in the proposed development; For Townhome Scenario51 54 S c h o o l F e e s
52 2021 School District Fees
School District Level 1 Res.
Fee
Level 1 Res. Dev.
Just. Study
Level 1 COMM/IND.
School Fee
Level 2/3 Nexus Study
Non Res. Dev.
Level 2/3 School Fee School FAC. Needs
Analysis
Alpine $2.34 sq ft Yes $0.19 sq ft No No/No No
Bonsall Unified $3.48 sq ft Yes $0.56 sq ft Yes $4.85 per sq ft. (Level 2) Yes Borrego Springs* $2.62 sq ft Yes $0.42 sq ft
Cajon Valley Union $2.53 sq ft Yes $0.41 sq ft No No/No No Cardiff $0.8951 sq ft No $0.144 sq ft No No/No No
Carlsbad Unified $4.08 sq ft Yes $0.66 sq ft Yes No/No No Chula Vista Elementary $1.80sq ft Yes $0.29 sq ft Yes No/No No Coronado Unified* $3.20 sq ft Yes $0.51 sq ft Yes No
Dehesa $1.63 sq ft No $0.26 sq ft No No/No No
Del Mar Union $1.80 sq ft Yes $0.29 sq ft Yes No/No No
Encinitas Union $1.94 sq ft Yes $0.31 sq ft No No/No No Escondido Union High $1.93 sq ft Yes $0.31 sq ft No No/No No Escondido Union $2.00 sq ft Yes $0.32 sq ft No No/No Yes Fallbrook Union Elementary $2.72 sq ft Yes $0.44 sq ft Yes No/No No Fallbrook Union High (2) $1.16 sq ft No $0.19 sq ft No No/No No Grossmont Union High $1.20 sq ft Yes $0.19 sq ft No No/No No Jamul-Dulzura Union $1.20 sq ft Yes $0.19 sq ft Yes No/No No Julian Union* $1.19 sq ft No $0.47 sq ft No No
La Mesa-Spring Valley $1.27 sq ft Yes $0.20 sq ft No No/No No Lakeside Union $2.53 sq ft Yes $0.41sq ft Yes No/No No
Lemon Grove $2.16 sq ft Yes $0.35 sq ft Yes No/No No
Mountain Empire Unified $3.79 sq ft Yes $0.61 sq ft Yes No/No No National (5) $1.41 sq ft Yes $0.22 sq ft (6) No No/No No Oceanside Unified (7) $4.08 sq ft Yes $0.66 sq ft Yes No/No No Poway Unified $4.08 sq ft Yes $0.66 sq ft Yes No/No Yes Ramona Unified $3.48 sq ft Yes $0.56 sq ft No No/No No
Rancho Santa Fe (4c) $2.16sq ft Yes $0.35 sq ft Yes No/No No San Diego Unified $4.08 sq ft Yes $0.66 sq ft No No/No No San Dieguito Union High (4c) $2.14 sq ft Yes $0.35 sq ft Yes No/No No San Marcos Unified $4.08sq ft Yes $0.66 sq ft Yes $4.44 sq ft (Level 2) Yes San Pasqual Union (1) $3.98 sq ft (1a) No $0.61 sq ft (1b) No No/No No Santee $2.38 sq ft Yes $0.41 sq ft Yes $3.38 (Level 2) No San Ysidro (3c) $2.49 sq ft Yes $0.40 sq ft No No/No Yes Solana Beach $1.94 sq ft Yes $0.09 sq ft No No/No No
South Bay Union $1.67 sq ft No $0.27 sq ft No No/No No
Sweetwater Union (3) $3.87 sq ft (3a) Yes $0.63 sq ft (3b) No No/No No Vallecitos $2.53 sq ft Yes $0.41 sq ft No No/No No
Valley Center-Pauma Unified $4.08 sq ft Yes $0.66 sq ft Yes No/No No Vista Unified $4.08 sq ft Yes $0.66 sq ft No No/No No
Warner Unified* $3.20 sq ft Yes $0.51 sq ft Yes No
Comments:
(1) District collects fees for San Pasqual Union and Escondido High School. San Pasqual receives 2/3 and Escondido receives 1/3. (1a) Residential fee distribution: San Pasqual: $2.72 / Escondido High: $1.26. (1b) Commercial/Industrial fee distribution: San Pasqual: $.44 / Escondido High: $0.203. (2) District also collects fees for Fallbrook Union Elementary and Vallecitos School District. (3) Fee distrubition based on Grades 9-12 schools and Grades 7-12 schools. (3a) Residential fee distribution: $1.59 (9-12) & $2.28 (7-12). (3b) Commercial/Industrial fee distribution: $0.26 (9-12) & $0.37 (7-12). (3c) San Ysidro charges the maximum Level I fee split $2.49 for San Ysidro and $1.59 to Sweetwater HS District, Commercial/Industrial split .40/.26 respectively (5) School fees begin at 500 sq. ft. and above.
(6) For rental self storage, the fee is $0.14 sq. ft.
(7) for hotel/motel and self-storage construction, District assesses $0.476/SF and $0.027/SF, respectively (*) BIA did not survey these districts for 2020-2021. The numbers reported are from the 2015-2016 survey. (**) BIA did not survey these districts for 2020-2021. The numbers reported are from the 2018-2019 survey. (4c) San Dieguito collects for Rancho Santa Fe Elementary District, Solana Beach Elementary District and Del Mar Union Elementary District. In Rancho Santa Fe, the fee breakdown is as follows: Residential fees: $2.16 for Rancho Santa Fe, $1.44 for San Dieguito; Commercial fees: $0.35 for Rancho Santa Fe, $0.23 for San Dieguito. 53 9201 Spectrum Center B lvd.
Ste. 110
San D iego, CA 92123
858-450-1221
www.biasandiego.org
54 STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP TO REVIEW AND DISCUSS THE CITY
OF SANTEE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 23, 2024
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this workshop is to review and discuss the findings and recommendations made in the Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the proposed updates to Development Impact Fees (DIFs or Impact Fees) prepared by Harris & Associates.
California’s AB1600, adopted in 1987 and codified as California Government Code Section 66000 et. seq., allows the City to impose Development Impact Fees on new development within the City. DIFs are a one-time charge on new development that is collected and used by the City to cover the cost of capital facilities, infrastructure, vehicles, and equipment that are required to serve new growth.
As provided in the City of Santee Impact Fee Ordinance, Santee collects impact fees from new development to pay for the costs of constructing public facilities which are reasonably related to the impacts of the new development. The City of Santee currently assesses drainage, traffic and traffic signal impact fees on non-residential and residential development, and park-in-lieu and public facilities fees on new residential development. The schedule of established fees may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. They can also be updated administratively by an annual inflation factor that is included as part of the adopting resolution.
The last time the City of Santee conducted a formal Development Impact Fee update was in 2005. Since that time, development impact fees have been automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year based on the previous year’s increase in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) or by 2.0 percent, whichever is higher.
City staff is recommending an updated Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and recommended Development Impact Fee Schedule in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code Section 66000 et seq.), as amended by AB 602.
DISCUSSION
A Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (Nexus Study or Report) is an analysis required by California law that demonstrates the need for additional backbone infrastructure and facilities to serve anticipated growth and identifies the associated costs of those infrastructure facilities and how these costs are recovered through development impact fees.
Attachment 3 – Previously provided October 23, 2024,
Staff Report provided for reference.
Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
The Mitigation Fee Act requires that all public agencies satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project:
1. Identify the purpose of the fee.
2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified.
3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
5. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
The purpose of the Nexus Study is to demonstrate that all fee components comply with the Mitigation Fee Act. The assumptions, methodologies, facility standards, costs, and cost allocation factors that were used to establish the nexus between the fees and the development on which the fees will be charged are summarized in the Nexus Study.
AB602 requires that when applicable, the Nexus Study identifies the existing level of service for each public facility, identifies the proposed new level of service, and includes an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. The Nexus Study meets this requirement and includes a CIP to be adopted as part of the Nexus Study.
The Nexus Study report prepared by Harris & Associates satisfies the AB1600 Nexus requirements, AB602 requirements, and provides the necessary technical analysis to support the adoption of updated development impact fees.
In September 2024, Harris & Associates and City staff met with the development community through the Building Industry Association (BIA) as part of the process to receive feedback on the draft report and the proposed fee schedule. Harris & Associated provided a presentation to the BIA and provided a draft report following the meeting. After reviewing the draft report, the BIA had no additional comments or questions regarding the report or the proposed development impact fees. In addition, numerous attempts were made to contact representatives of the Association of General Contractors (AGC) but all attempts were unsuccessful as there was no response from the AGC. The BIA and AGC did not have any questions or comments to be considered by the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 66019.
FEE ANALYSIS
The City completed the last nexus study for the Impact Fees in 2005. At that time the list of projects was amended and the fees for both residential and non-residential were updated based upon the revised project list and revised project construction costs; however, the city has not completed a fee study for the Impact Fees since that time. Because of the extended amount of time, the need to update the project list and construction costs, and to comply with Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
AB602, the City began a new nexus fee study for the Impact Fees with Harris & Associates.
Harris & Associates worked with City staff to update the land uses, assumptions in the analysis, project list, construction costs, and ensuring compliance with AB602.
Currently, Santee collects the following Impact Fees: Public Facilities Fee, Traffic Signal Fee, Traffic Mitigation Fee, Drainage Fee, Park In-Lieu Fee, and RTCIP Fee. The RTCIP Fee is updated annually by SANDAG and therefore, was not included in the Nexus Study. Funds from each of these Impact Fees are maintained in separate accounts until expended pursuant to the requirements of each Impact Fee. The description and purpose of each of these Impact Fees are set forth below:
Public Facilities Fee — The Public Facilities Fee is collected from new development for the installation of passive and active park facilities and for the construction of community buildings/recreation facilities. Public Facilities Fees collected from new development projects are maintained in the Public Facilities Fund.
Traffic Signal Fee — The Traffic Signal Fee is collected from new development for the installation of needed traffic signals identified from the City’s traffic signal needs list and the Nexus Study CIP, once adopted. Traffic Signal Fees collected from new development projects are maintained in the Traffic Signal Fund.
Traffic Mitigation Fee — The Traffic Mitigation Fee is collected from new development for the installation of needed improvements identified in the Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan and the Nexus Study CIP, once adopted. Traffic Mitigation Fees collected from new development projects are maintained in the Traffic Mitigation Fund.
Drainage Fee — The Drainage Fee is collected from new development for the installation of needed drainage improvements identified in the City’s latest master drainage facility study and the Nexus Study CIP, once adopted.
Park In-Lieu Fee — The Park In-Lieu Fee is collected from new development for the acquisition and development of park facilities. Park In-Lieu Fees collected from new development projects are maintained in the Park In-Lieu Fund.
The Nexus Study includes the following proposed new development impact fees:
Fire Facilities Fee — The Fire Facilities Fee is a new proposed DIF that will be collected from new development that will be used to help fund the construction of new fire stations and the procurement of apparatus to serve the City.
Long Range Planning — The Long Range Planning Fee is a new proposed fee and will be collected from new development for the purpose of contributing to fund updates to the City’s General Plan Elements and Sustainable Santee Plan. The General Plan is made up of multiple elements that are updated periodically to account for changes in the City over time. The State of California requires that among these elements be included: Land Use, Conservation, Noise, Environmental Justice, Circulation, Open Space, Safety, Air Quality, and Housing. The City of Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
Santee combines the Safety and Environmental Justice elements and additionally includes a Recreation element.
Program Administration — The Program Administration Fee is a new proposed fee to be collected from new development. There have been recent changes in the Mitigation Fee Act which governs the collection of impact fees. AB602 went into effect in 2022 and added Section 66016.5 to the Mitigation Fee Act and imposed several new requirements on impact fees. Three of those requirements directly impact administration of the City’s development impact fee program. First, AB602 requires that nexus studies be updated every eight years, from the period beginning on January 1, 2022. Second, AB602 requires that all fee studies shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units in the development, unless certain findings are made, and a local agency that imposes the fee utilizing this method shall be deemed to have used a valid method to establish the reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. Third, AB602 states that large jurisdictions shall adopt a CIP as part of the nexus study.
A two percent (2%) Program Administrative Fee is proposed to be added to fund the costs of the City’s management and ongoing fee program administration, collection, and reporting, based on an analysis of the administrative cost necessary to support the DIF Program. This includes costs associated with City staff and consultant time, studies, and administration to support the program and the recent additional administration requirements created by AB602.
The proposed 2 percent fee is below the industry standard of 3 to 6 percent.
The Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study provides an in-depth analysis of each of the impact fee categories, as well as, supporting detail of how the proposed development impact fees meet the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.
SUMMARY OF NEXUS STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS
The following is an overview of the recommended updates to the City’s development impact fee program found in the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study:
1. Adjustments to the existing development impact fees are recommended based on the findings in the Nexus Study.
2. Three new development impact fees are being proposed for Fire Facilities, Long-Range Planning and Program Administration as discussed earlier in this report.
3. A change in the methodology for calculating residential impact fees from a per unit basis to square footage was applied to comply with the proportionality requirement of AB602.
4. It is recommended that annual fee adjustments be based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index instead of the Consumer Price Index. This change would require an update to the City’s Municipal Code.
The proposed Development Impact Fees are provided in the table below. The proposed updates to the fees are described in detail in the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study.
Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
The City recognizes that because there has not been an update to the Nexus study since 2005, the maximum allowable fees would be a considerable increase over the existing fee currently applied to development. The following table compares the proposed fees against the existing fees for residential land uses. Existing residential fees were converted from a fee per dwelling unit to per square foot. Fees for Fire Facilities, General Plan, and Program Administration are new proposed fees so there are no existing fees to compare to.
Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (Residential) Land Use Public Facilities Traffic Signal Traffic Mitigation Drainage Park in-Lieu Fire Facilities Long Range
Planning Administration (1)
Residential
Single Family $ 5.21 $ 0.39 $ 2.82 $ 0.35 $ 6.66 $ 1.75 $ 0.08 $ 0.35 Multi-Family $ 5.79 $ 0.30 $ 2.19 $ 0.43 $ 7.41 $ 1.95 $ 0.09 $ 0.36 Non-Residential
Commercial Exempt $ 1,946.24 $ 14,182.60 $ 1,684.85 Exempt 887.29 $ $ 39.84 $ 374.82 Office Exempt $ 1,073.96 $ 7,826.17 $ 629.63 Exempt 1,950.08 $ $ 87.56 $ 231.35 Industrial Exempt $ 248.49 $ 1,810.81 $ 1,291.25 Exempt 195.01 $ $ 8.76 $ 71.09 Notes:
1 An administrative fee (2% of each fee) is collected for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) development impact fee program administration costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analysis. (Fee per Square Foot)
(Fee per 1,000 Building Square Foot)
Single Family Existing Fee (1) Proposed Fee Percentage Change Public Facilities $ 3.67 $ 5.21 42%
Traffic Signal $ 0.21 $ 0.39 83%
Traffic Mitigation $ 2.07 $ 2.82 36%
Drainage (2) $ 1.99 $ 0.35 -82%
Park in-lieu $ 4.42 $ 6.66 51%
Fire Facilities $ - $ 1.75 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 0.08 N/A
Administration $ - $ 0.35 N/A
TOTAL $ 12.36 $ 17.61 42%
Multi Family Existing Fee (1) Proposed Fee Percentage Change Public Facilities $ 4.56 $ 5.79 27%
Traffic Signal $ 0.18 $ 0.30 63%
Traffic Mitigation $ 1.78 $ 2.19 23%
Drainage $ 1.54 $ 0.43 -72%
Park in-lieu $ 5.54 $ 7.41 34%
Fire Facilities $ - $ 1.95 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 0.09 N/A
Administration $ - $ 0.36 N/A
TOTAL $ 13.60 $ 18.52 36%
Notes:
1 2
Ex isting fees w ere conv erted from a fee per dw elling unit to per square foot using the same residential size assumptions in this study to prov ide a more accurate comparison to the new fee structure.
Drainage Fee for ex isting Single Family takes the av erage of Land Uses: HL, R1, R1A, and R2.
Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
The table below provides a comparison of the proposed fees against the existing fees for nonresidential land uses. Office and Commercial land uses experience a large increase (144% and 50% respectively), mainly due to the Traffic Signal and Traffic Mitigation fees. The existing fee collected on these two land uses were abnormally low. Furthermore, the assumptions for nonresidential development have changed significantly since the prior fee update, which greatly impacted the analysis.
Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (Non-Residential) Commercial Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal $ 1,568.00 $ 1,946.24 24%
Traffic Mitigation $ 9,721.00 $ 14,182.60 46%
Drainage $ 1,452.00 $ 1,684.85 16%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities $ - $ 887.29 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 39.84 N/A
Administration $ - $ 374.82 N/A
TOTAL $ 12,741.00 $ 19,115.64 50%
Office Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal $ 470.00 $ 1,073.96 129%
Traffic Mitigation $ 2,913.00 $ 7,826.17 169%
Drainage $ 1,452.00 $ 629.63 -57%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities $ - $ 1,950.08 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 87.56 N/A
Administration $ - $ 231.35 N/A
TOTAL $ 4,835.00 $ 11,798.75 144%
Industrial Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal $ 197.00 $ 248.49 26%
Traffic Mitigation $ 1,216.00 $ 1,810.81 49%
Drainage $ 1,452.00 $ 1,291.25 -11%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities $ - $ 195.01 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 8.76 N/A
Administration $ - $ 71.09 N/A
TOTAL $ 2,865.00 $ 3,625.41 27%
Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
The DIFs may be adjusted periodically to reflect revised facility requirements, receipt of funding from alternative sources (i.e., state or federal grants), revised facilities or costs, changes in demographics, changes in the average unit square footage, or changes in the land use plan.
In accordance with Santee Municipal Code section 12.30.050, Santee Development Impact Fees are automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year. The inflation adjustment is two percent or based on the previous calendar years increase in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (CPI-U: All Items) as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, whichever is higher. If the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study is approved, the Municipal Code would need to be updated to adjust fees annually on July 1st based on the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the 20-City Average as reported by Engineering News Record (ENR) for a twelvemonth period or a similar published index if the CCI Index is no longer available.
PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENTS
According to the California Government Code, prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee, an agency must hold at least one open and public meeting with at least 30 days’ notice. In addition, notice of the time and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered, and a statement that the data required by this section is available, shall be mailed at least 14 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the local agency for mailed notice of the meeting on new or increased fees or service charges. Any written request for mailed notices shall be valid for one year from the date on which it is filed unless a renewal request is filed. At least ten days prior to this meeting, the agency must make data on infrastructure costs and funding sources available to the public. Notice of the time and place of the meeting and a general explanation of the matter are to be published in accordance with Section 6062a of the Government Code, which states that publication of notice shall occur for ten days in a newspaper regularly published once a week or more. The new or increased fees shall be effective no earlier than 60 days following the final action on the adoption or increase of the fees.
To meet the above noticing requirements, the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the East County Californian on October 11, 2024, and will be published two additional times on November 1 and November 8, 2024. Staff mailed two letters to interested parties on October 11, 2024. Both the BIA and SDG&E had a written request for notification of fee increases on file with the City Clerk. The Notice of Public Hearing was also posted outside the City Council Chambers on October 11, 2024. The final draft Development Impact Fee Nexus Study will be available for public review in the City Clerk’s Office and made available on the City’s website on November 1, 2024.
The public hearing to adopt the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the proposed updates to the development impact fees, is currently scheduled on November 13, 2024. If the proposed development impact fees are approved, the new fees would take effect at least 60 days following the public hearing on January 13, 2025.
Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it does not constitute a project, as defined by Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council conduct the public workshop to review and discuss the Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the proposed updated development impact fees. It is further recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing on November 13, 2024, to consider public testimony and adopt the Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the proposed updated development impact fees.
STAFF REPORT
PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SANTEE MUNICIPAL CODE , TITLE 13,
“ZONING” REGARDING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE FRONT
YARD (CASE FILE: ZOA-2024-0003)
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 13, 2024
A. BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Santee Municipal Code (SMC) Section 13.10.040 and Section
13.10.050A, accessory structures are prohibited in front and exterior side yards in Residential zoning districts. In September 2023 and May 2024, City Council held two workshops to discuss potential changes to the SMC to allow accessory structures in the front and exterior side yards and directed staff to return with proposed changes to the SMC.
The proposed changes would allow accessory structures in the front and exterior side yards along with criteria including, but not limited to, setbacks, height, and size, which is further discussed in this report.
B. OVERVIEW OF EXISTING REGULATIONS
SMC Section 13.10.040 provides minimum standards for residential development, including minimum front and exterior side yard setbacks. SMC Section 13.10.050A allows for attached and detached residential accessory structures to encroach within the interior side and rear yards only. Currently, detached accessory structures are prohibited to be placed in front of the main structure.
SMC Title 11, Buildings and Construction, exempts detached accessory structures 120 square feet or less from requiring a building permit. However, structures not requiring a building permit are subject to other requirements in the SMC such as zoning and fire codes. Any proposed changes to the building exemption requirements in SMC Title 11 Buildings and Construction prompted by changes to the setback standards would be presented to City Council early next year.
C. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED REVISIONS
Based on input from the previous City Council workshops, proposed changes to the development criteria to allow accessory structures in the front and exterior side Staff Report, November 13, 2024
Accessory Structures