Agenda packet — Santee City Council, January 8, 2025

MEETING INFORMATION
Wednesday, January 8, 2025
6:30 p.m.

Council Chamber | Building 2
10601 Magnolia Ave • Santee, CA 92071
Regular Meeting for the Santee City Council and the Community Development Commission (CDC) Successor Agency
TO WATCH LIVE:

AT&T U-verse channel 99 (SD Market) | Cox channel 117 (SD County) www.cityofsanteeca.gov

IN-PERSON ATTENDANCE
Members of the public who wish to view the Council Meeting live, can watch the live taping of the Council meeting in the Council Chamber on the meeting date and time listed above.

LIVE PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public who wish to comment on matters on the City Council agenda or during Non-Agenda Public Comment may appear in person and submit a speaker slip, before the item is called. Your name will be called when it is time to speak.

PLEASE NOTE: Public Comment will be limited to 3 minutes and speaker slips will only be accepted until the item is called. The timer will begin when the participant begins speaking.

January 8, 2025 | 6:30 p.m.
2 ROLL CALL: Mayor John W. Minto
Vice Mayor Rob McNelis – District 1
Councilmember Ronn Hall – District 2
Councilmember Laura Koval – District 3
Councilmember Dustin Trotter – District 4
LEGISLATIVE INVOCATION: Lakeside Christian Church – Eric King

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PRESENTATION: San Diego County Library, Santee Branch
CONSENT CALENDAR:

PLEASE NOTE: Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be approved by one motion, with no separate discussion prior to voting. The public, staff or Council Members may request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion or action. Speaker slips for this category must be presented to the City Clerk at the start of the meeting. Speakers are limited to 3 minutes.
(1) Approval of Reading by Title Only and Waiver of Reading in Full of Ordinances and Resolutions on the Agenda. (City Clerk – Jeffries)

(2) Approval of Payment of Demands as Presented. (Finance – Jennings) (3) Adoption of a Resolution Accepting the Citywide Slurry Seal and Roadway Maintenance Program 2024 (CIP 2024-02) Project as Complete and Finding the Action is Not a Project Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). (Engineering – Schmitz)
(4) Adoption of a Resolution Adopting the Second Amendment to the SanteeLakeside Emergency Medical Services Authority Joint Exercise of Power Agreement. (Fire – Matsushita)
(5) Adoption of a Resolution Proclaiming the Termination of the Existence of a Local Emergency Relating to Extreme Fire Risk in the San Diego River Corridor and the Completion of the Defensible Space Maintenance to Mitigate Fire Risk; and Finding Such Action is Exempt from Environmental Review Under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15269(c). (City Manager – Best)
(6) Emergency Purchase Ratification of Cyber Security Software for the City of Santee. (City Manager – Best)
January 8, 2025 | 6:30 p.m.
3 (7) Adoption of a Resolution of the Community Development Commission Successor Agency Approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the Period from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026 (“ROPS 25-26”). (Finance – Jennings) (CDC Successor Agency Agenda Item)
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT (15 minutes):

Persons wishing to address the City Council regarding items not on the posted agenda may do so at this time. In accordance with State law, Council may not take action on an item not scheduled on the Agenda. If appropriate, the item will be referred to the City Manager or placed on a future agenda. This first Non-Agenda Public Comment period is limited to a total of 15 minutes. Additional Non-Agenda Public Comment is received prior to Council Reports.

PUBLIC HEARING:
(8) Continued Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance Adopting the City of Santee Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and Resolution Approving Development Impact Fees for All New Development within the City. (Finance – Jennings)
Recommendation:

1. Conduct and close the public hearing opened on November 13, 2024; and

2. Adopt the Resolution approving the City of Santee Development Impact Fee Nexus Study, approving development impact fees for all new development within the city, and taking other actions related thereto; and

3. Introduce and conduct the First Reading of the Ordinance adopting the City of Santee Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the new and updated development impact fees; and

4. Set and conduct the Second Reading of the Ordinance for January 22, 2025.

NEW BUSINESS:
(9) Appointment of Boards, Commissions and Committees Representatives for Council and Citizen Committees. (Mayor – Minto)
Recommendation:

Take action on the Mayor’s recommendation to the City’s Boards, Commissions and Committees appointments.

January 8, 2025 | 6:30 p.m.
4 NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT (Continued):

All public comment not presented within the first Non-Agenda Public Comment period above will be heard at this time.

CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:

CITY MANAGER REPORTS:

CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS:

CLOSED SESSION:
(10) Conference with Labor Negotiators
(Government Code Section 54957.6)
City Designated Representative: City Manager
Employee Organization: Santee Firefighters Association
ADJOURNMENT:

January 8, 2025 | 6:30 p.m.
5 Jan 02 SPARC Cancelled Council Chamber
Jan 08 Council Meeting Council Chamber
Jan 13 Community Oriented Policing Committee Council Chamber Jan 22 Council Meeting Council Chamber
Feb 06 SPARC Council Chamber
Feb 10 Community Oriented Policing Committee Council Chamber Feb 12 Council Meeting Council Chamber
Feb 26 Council Meeting Council Chamber
The Santee City Council welcomes you and encourages your continued interest and involvement in the City’s decision-making process.

For your convenience, a complete Agenda Packet is
available for public review at City Hall and on the
City’s website at www.CityofSanteeCA.gov.

The City of Santee complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 12132 of the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12132). Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s Office at (619) 258-4100, ext. 114 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible.

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES

JANUARY AND FEBRUARY MEETINGS

vchlist
12/02/2024 10:50:45AM
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher
61875
61888
Date ------------------
Vendor Invoice ----------
11/26/2024 10956 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
11/26/2024 10955 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
2 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
2 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by:...-=�.y..,..-<-.>....._.,.'--1,___�--t-::;;;.----- Date: ___ ---t-'-r:.....---r.,..-...._,.-=-
PPE 11/20/24
PPE 11/20/24
PO# Description/Account

CA STATE TAX WITHHELD
Total:

FED WITHHOLDING & MEDICARE
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
Amount
35,048.25
35,048.25
104,969.64
104,969.64
140,017.89
140,017.89

Page 1 ends

vchlist
12/02/2024 10:59:11AM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher Date _V_
e_
nd_
o
_
r ________________
l
n
_v_
o i_c_e ________ P_O_# _____ Description/Ac count
6376658
6381518
11/29/2024 14705 RHS MISSIONSQUARE
11/29/2024 14704 457 MISSIONSQUARE
2 Vouchers fo r bank code : ubgen
PPE 11/20/24 RETIREE HSA
PPE 11/20/24 ICMA-457
Total:

Total:

Bank total
2 Vouchers in this re p ort Total vouchers
Pceparnd by,�� ""
Date /�tr Approved by: Gr�=
Date: 7 Z.- 7,· -i)/
Amount
5,199.04
5,199.04
39,477.89
39,477.89
44,676.93
44,676.93

Page 2 ends

PyBatch
12/02/2024 9:29:11AM

EARNINGS SECTION
Type Hours/units
Grand Totals
reth
Grand
Totals

0.00 Rate
Payroll Processing Report
- CITY OF SANTEE
12/1/2024 to 12/31/2024-1 Cycle m

DEDUCTIONS SECTION
Amount Src Plan Base Wages Deduction Benefit/Cont LvPlan 5,460.00
5,460.00
Employees: 30
catax 5,460.00
fedtax 5,460.00

46.00 211.00
257.00 0.00

LEAVE SECTION
Accrued
Gross:

Net:

Taken
5,460.00
5,203.00
Banked
<< No Errors/ No Warnings >>
Lost

Page 3 ends

vchlist
12/04/2024 11 :28:52AM
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher
11244
Date Vendor
12/3/2024 10353 PERS
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by'.\,, �/
Date Zlt A
D
pp
ate:
m,ed by=
/ Z.- ·;
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
11 24 4
-------
PO# Description/Account

RETIREMENT PAYMENT
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
Amount
158,857.09
158,857.09
158,857.09
158,857.09

Page 4 ends

vchlist
12/04/2024 10:56:47 AM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
137942
Date Vendor
12/4/2024 10001 US BANK
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
000021
000022
000045
0010719
0026
002770
0028036
002926BEST
002926CSD
002926CURTIS
002926FOST
002926KING
002926LOWN
002926MORR
002926NORT
002926RENS
002926TOLL
014539
015458
017057
0173027
017596
018213
019864
0200471-1
020150
024346
026067
029298
033178
033626
034040
034140
035035
035951
039725
PO# Description/Account Amount
150.00
150.00
461.62
370.91

31.20 WELLNESS

WELLNESS

HEALTH & WELLNESS

PICKLEBALL IMPROVEMENTS

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
BREWS & BITES SUPPLIES 174.42
MATERALS & SUPPLIES 148.28
CPRS MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 150.00
CPRS ANNUAL AGENCYMEMBERS 550.00
CPRS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENE 150.00
CPRS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENE 150.00
CPRS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENE 150.00
CPRS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENE 150.00
CPRS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENE 20.00
CPRS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENE 150.00
CPRS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENE 150.00
CPRS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENE 150.00
SPECIAL EVENTS SUPPLIES 6.78
TEEN SUPPLIES 38.87
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 21.52
OFFICE SUPPLIES 34.56
MEETING SUPPLIES 21.21
MEDIC UNIT SUPPLIES 53.82
3RD GRADE POSTER CONTEST 170.00
3RD GRADE POSTER CONTEST 790.00
TEEN CENTER SUPPLIES 54.86
STATION SUPPLIES 51.57
WELLNESS ACTIVITY 320.00
FIRE STATION OPEN HOUSE 73.91
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 5.39
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 40.92
SENIOR TRIPS 1,814.40
EVENT SUPPLIES 10.78
MEETING SUPPLIES 32.00
MEETING SUPPLIES 12.79
EVENT SUPPLIES 71.09

Page 5 ends

vchlist
12/04/2024 10:56:47AM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
137942
Date Vendor
12/4/2024 10001 US BANK
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
(Continued)
040065
040482
0414820
042320
0424255
043612
046973
048839
048860
049101
0520687
053732
061115
062155
067719
075885
085675
09062024
091168
095654
096269
10/15/2024
10012024
100724-MEI
100724-MORGAN
10112024
10152024MB
101877537
10212024
1053708
105937
1071457
1118
113933416
1141406837
1143193133
PO# Description/Account Amount
BREWS & BITES SUPPLIES 43.07
STARLIGHT CIRCLE MEETING SUP 61.56
SMALL TOOL 410.27
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 51.65
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 57.29
APPARATUS EQUIPMENT 6.47
FIRE STATION OPEN HOUSE 22.60
EVENT AND REC SUPPLIES 14.00
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 1.35
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 16.16
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 32.29
CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIES 85.40
EVENT SUPPLIES 100.87
FIRE STATION OPEN HOUSE 472.91
HEALTH & WELLNESS 73.59
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 59.36
FIRE STATION OPEN HOUSE 18.67
FIRE STATION OPEN HOUSE 565.00
SENIOR SUPPLIES 65.04
WELLNESS 34.34

20.70 165.00

90.00 340.00
340.00
199.00
775.00
189.10

49.50 142.14
191.40
215.45
1,815.21
119.54
535.99

MEETING SUPPLIES

CPRS MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL

EVENT PROMOTION

ITE MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL - MEI

ITE RENEWAL - MORGAN

CASI MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL - ST
LEAGUE OF CA CITIES REGISRATI<

ACCESSIBILITY CODE BOOK PURC

FITNESS PROGRAM SUBSCRIPTIO

REFERENCE MANUAL

SANTEE CUP PATCHES

STORMWATER SUPPLIES

LODGING FOR LEAGUE OF CA CITI

SUPPLIES

GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES
BREWS & BITES SUPPLIES 185.24

Page 6 ends

FIRE STATION OPEN HOUSE

OFFICE FURNITURE

REGISTRATION FEES

REGISTRATION FEE

LODGING FOR LEAGUE OF CA CITI

BREWS & BITES SUPPLIES

BREWS & BITES SUPPLIES
CONFERENCE HOTEL 833.16
153010 MEETING SUPPLIES 9.75
153841 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 1,039.63
154266 MEETING SUPPLIES 12.95
15723 CPR RECERTIFICATION 565.69
1618 LODGING FOR LEAGUE OF CA CITI 1,995.31
163391 DE-0003 BREWS & BITES MARKETING 28.78
1644257 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 26.81
1798661 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 44.99
1BF63 PARKING AT RIVERSIDE CONVENT 10.00
2 WELLNESS 35.57
200000951 CAL CHIEFS CONFERENCE 600.00
2010316 GRAFFITI REMOVAL SUPPLIES 75.79
206468 FIRE STATION OPEN HOUSE 26.04
20713540 TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 28.84
20742 PARKS AND REC TRAINING 140.00
2100 3RD GRADE POSTER CONTEST 100.00
2203194 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 187.06
2289056 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 582.87
2296225 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 21.53
2369019 SUPPLIES 98.26
241002-05-3 SPARC PREP MEETING 93.44
28453 MEETING DUES 30.00
289312 LIVESCAN 114.00
28957669 BREWS & BITES BANNER 105.92
28961835 BREWS & BITES BANNER 133.31
28966644 HOLIDAY LIGHTING FLYER 80.42
28971556 WELLNESS SUPPLIES 120.78

Page 7 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/04/2024 10:56:47AM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137942 12/4/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
28991953 PICKLEBALL BANNER 39.63
29013609 HOLIDAY LIGHTING BANNER 585.55
29870 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 55.37
30 BREWS & BITES SUPPLIES 17.22
300005721 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 130.00
3057070 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 35.69
310 CAL CHIEFS PRE-CONFNCE MTG 20.00
313117 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 200.00
320072 WEARING APPAREL 64.00
3224266 TEEN CENTER PUMPKINS LIBRAR' 215.50
3376263 PUB ED SUPPLIES 166.51
3432237 PICKLEBALL IMPROVEMENTS 1,786.63
3433865 OFFICE SUPPLIES 65.03
34338652 OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.53
3697830 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.76
38328249 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 32.30
3AAEF PARKING AT RIVERSIDE CONVENT 10.00
4020323 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 18.29
4067421 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 68.91
4179455 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 10.66
418 MOVIE IN THE PARK SUPPLIES 140.00
4301005 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 63.60
4311413 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 20.40
431568241 MILITARY SUPPORT - SUPPLIES 246.75
43362517 CAL CHIEFS CONFERENCE 588.48
435822 CONFERENCE LODGING 242.24
4518802 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 34.54
46156137 SURVEY MONKEY ANNUAL RENEV\ 468.00
483068 WELLNESS 243.85
5020039 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 232.65
5076193045 SUBSCRIPTION 100.80
5337867 CODE & ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 21.49
5465020 OFFICE SUPPLIES 61.40
5658667 TRAFFIC SUPPLIES 34.89
5753864 PLANNING SUPPLIES 18.31
5957845 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 52.80

Page 8 ends

vchlist
12/04/2024 10:56:47 AM
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
----------------- Invoice
137942 12/4/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
6081830
610664
61252
6226645-A
6226645-B
6381066
6385017
6559455
66066
6609021
67308932
683BGA4262
69738006
7014803
7033870
704234
71277
7177017
7183451
733244812
749360
7523477
7693853
7697842
77294
78175422
79465
8013617
8028357
8057037
8057037{R)
80686482
80767570
8173038
81993
8451
PO# Description/Account Amount
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SUPPL 104.36
MILITARY SUPPORT - SUPPLIES 702.22
HEALTH AND WELLNESS 79.98
OFFICE SUPPLIES 32.31
OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.02
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 32.28
ENVELOPES FOR PAYROLL 24.32
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 46.00
PURCHASE OF LUNCH AT CONFEFs 21.03
SMALL TOOLS 307.09
TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 33.79
FACEBOOK BOOST FOR BREWS Al 75.00
TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 29.99
SMALL TOOLS 407.30
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 35.08
NAME TAGS 31.50
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 93.70
OFFICE STOCK 15.40
OFFICE SUPPLIES 103.19
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 365.93
WORK SHIRTS 165.94
GRAFFITI REMOVAL 156.16
3RD GRADE POSTER CONTEST 129.24
STATION SUPPLIES 105.27
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 23.66
TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 34.96
PICKLEBALL IMPROVEMENTS 210.72
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES - PARK Ml 59.21
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 181.82
ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 18.31
CREDIT ON ENGINEERING & PLAN -18.31
TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 32.98
TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 28.79
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 115.14
PICKLEBALL IMPROVEMENTS 139.47
GMAX TESTING 2,300.00

Page 9 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/04/2024 10:56:47AM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137942 12/4/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
86098314 CASI SUMMIT RESERVATION - STU 725.55
8671426 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 37.65
8748237 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 25.22
8748237(8) ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 14.19
8912229 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 7.53
8912229-2 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 27.90
8960207 VEHICLE REPAIR SUPPLIES 180.39
9014168 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 116.14
9113 VEHICLE SUPPLIES 234.69
9217844 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 17.44
9321825 TEEN CENTER ART SUPPLIES 41.61
9353057 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 310.31
937034 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 635.73
9413816 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 129.29
94528 PARKING AT RIVERSIDE CONVENT 10.00
96549864 TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 30.69
9766610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.30
97867 PICKLEBALL IMPROVEMENTS 111.48
98411530 TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 30.88
98671 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 49.98
98877 CPRS CONFERENCE REGISTRATIC 495.00
98928 DIRECTOR CPRS CONFERENCE RI 495.00
9998620 CITY CLERK OFFICE SUPPLIES 77.45
C56FGWGF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 120.00
CR200014867 CREDIT- BACKFLOW TEST FEE -185.00
G4BQ8AC262 FACEBOOK BOOST SEPT 19 THRO 49.77
I N005788/2024 SHIFT CALENDARS 727.37
INV4309 WESTON PARK CALSENSE 795.00
KCWD2B8262 FACEBOOK BOOST FOR BREWS Al 75.00
MC16263393 MAILCHIMP PREMIUM PLAN 350.00
Q15.000024933 ICC MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL - STU 310.00
SA5654254 BREWS & BITES SUPPLIES 330.02
sHgkr HEALTH & WELLNESS 93.22
SPOOKEASY24 EVENT RESEARCH 150.00
sYnKd HEALTH AND WELLNESS 84.76
TNG2VVS SECURITY CERTIFICATE 89.99

Page 10 ends

vchlist
12/04/2024 10:56:47AM
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher
137942
Date Vendor
12/4/2024 10001 10001 US BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by:_��----\;�{;�{_AJ�(;-t'\�fl___._.,,_1__.,.....-:::�---- Date: \ 9-/�21-\� ----�. .--a .

Approved by: ��
Date: _ 1v\11lv1
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
(Continued)
-------
PO# Description/Account
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
Amount
43,572.70
43,572.70
43,572.70

Page 11 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/05/2024 12:00:18PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
137943 12/5/2024 11139 ACE UNIFORMS, LLC - SAN DIEGO SD0200043 54825 SD0200780 54990
SD0200825 54825
137944 12/5/2024 14954 ADVANCED ELECTRICAL INNOVATION 334 54873 343 54873
350 54873
351 54873
352 54873
395 54873
410 54873
411 54873
412 54873
413 54873
137945 12/5/2024 13456 AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTROL 773593 54828 774382 54828
137946 12/5/2024 10412 AT&T 301053963; DEC24
137947 12/5/2024 10516 AWARDS BY NAVAJO 1024388
1024389
137948 12/5/2024 12496 BALL, BYRON 114
137949 12/5/2024 10017 BAY CITY ELECTRIC WORKS W303933 55024 137950 12/5/2024 10177 BAYOU BROTHERS PRODUCTIONS 112224 55081 Description/Account

WEARING APPAREL

WEARING APPAREL
Total:

ELECTRICAL REPAIRS & MAINT

ELECTRICAL REPAIRS & MAINT
FY24/25 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS & N
Total:

PEST CONTROL SERVICES

PEST CONTROL SERVICES
Total:

MAST PARK
Total:

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES
Total:

HOLIDAY LIGHTING ENTERTAINME
Total:

GENERATOR MAINT & REPAIRS
Total:

HOLIDAY LIGHTING ENTERTAINME
Total:

Amount

66.57 552.10

19.59 638.26
773.25
568.57
957.19
1,773.72
1,254.61
1,133.00
134.43
896.15
448.08
953.24
8,892.24
195.00
135.25
330.25
159.79
159.79

9.69 56.00

65.69 480.00
480.00
500.00
500.00
1,200.00
1,200.00

Page 12 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/05/2024 12:00:18PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
137951 12/5/2024 12951 BERRY, BONNIE December 1, 2024
137952 12/5/2024 13405 BOFFO ENTERTAINMENT INC 112224
137953 12/5/2024 14620 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP IN1821890 137954 12/5/2024 10032 CINTAS CORPORATION 694 4211278972 137955 12/5/2024 15152 COAR DESIGN GROUP 22513
137956 12/5/2024 10268 COOPER, JACKIE December 1, 2024
137957 12/5/2024 10333 COX COMMUNICATIONS 112256001; NOV24 137958 12/5/2024 10841 DANIELS, ADAM 112024
137959 12/5/2024 13129 DAVID TURCH AND ASSOCIATES INV 11122024DT 137960 12/5/2024 15441 DICKERSON, ERIC
137961 12/5/2024 10251 FEDERAL EXPRESS 8-696-7 4609
137962 12/5/2024 11119 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 4650141 4650141-1
137963 12/5/2024 15433 GENERAL CODE LLC 38272
PO# Description/Account

RETIREE HEALTH PAYMENTS
Total:
55053 HOLIDAY LIGHTING PHOTOGRAPH
Total:
55059 NETWORK SECURITY SOFTWARE
Total:
54844 MISC SHOP RENTALS
Total:
54666 NEW FIRE STATION AT CITY OPERI
Total:

RETIREE HEALTH PAYMENT
Total:
9130 CARLTON OAKS DR
Total:

EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
54881 HWY 52 COALITION CONSULTING I
Total:

SENIOR HOLIDAY LUNCHEON ENTI
Total:

FEDEX SHIPPING CHARGES
Total:
55000 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
55000 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
Total:
55077 MUNICIPAL CODE CODIFICATION
Amount

91.00 91.00
850.00
850.00
4,075.65
4,075.65

72.90 72.90
64,825.00
64,825.00
91 .00

91.00 96.88

96.88 250.00
250.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
150.00
150.00
268.96
268.96
907.21
1,595.14
2,502.35
3,446.10

Page 13 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/05/2024 12:00:18PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137963 12/5/2024 15433 15433 GENERAL CODE LLC (Continued) Total: 3,446.10 137964 12/5/2024 12638 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY, INC. INV1028992 55094 ADMIN - LIABILITY CLAIMS 4,000.00 INV1029220 55094 ADMIN - LIABILITY CLAIMS 1,500.00
INV1029569 55094 ADMIN - LIABILITY CLAIMS 1,500.00
INV1029824 55094 ADMIN - LIABILITY CLAIMS 1,500.00
INV1030079 55094 ADMIN - LIABILITY CLAIMS 1,500.00
Total: 10,000.00
137965 12/5/2024 13558 KIFER HYDRAULICS CO, INC 84345 54888 VEHICLE REPAIR PART 13.53 Total: 13.53
137966 12/5/2024 15439 KORO, TONY 6587 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 108.00 Total: 108.00
137967 12/5/2024 10204 LIFE ASSIST INC 1527289 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 279.45 1527380 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 852.21
1527504 54807 EMS SUPPLIES 2,806.05
Total: 3,937.71
137968 12/5/2024 15225 LONG, CHERYL L December 1, 2024 RETIREE HEALTH PAYMENTS 91.00 Total: 91.00
137969 12/5/2024 11783 MINTO, JOHN 10312024JM MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 159.46 Total: 159.46
137970 12/5/2024 15342 NAPA AUTO PARTS 950666 55003 VEHICLE REPAIR PART 65.29 Total: 65.29
137971 12/5/2024 14690 PATH INC Q9 - Jul24-Sep24 54265 ARPA - PATH HOMELESS OUTREAC 19,684.98 Total: 19,684.98
137972 12/5/2024 12186 PETERSON LIGHTING 4016-A HOLIDAY LIGHTING LIGHT RENTAL 90.00 Total: 90.00
137973 12/5/2024 10101 PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL SUPPLY 25088 55048 OXYGEN CYLINDER RENTAL 564.61 25286 55048 OXYGEN CYLINDER RENTAL 70.40
25453 55048 OXYGEN CYLINDER RENTAL 113.20

Page 14 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/05/2024 12:00:18PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 137973 12/5/2024 10101 PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL SUPPLY (Continued) 25792 55048 OXYGEN CYLINDER RENTAL 48.00
Total: 796.21
137974 12/5/2024 12062 PURETEC INDUSTRIAL WATER 2223046 55042 DEIONIZED WATER SERVICE - PS[ 158.40 Total: 158.40
137975 12/5/2024 10095 RASA 5840 54976 MAP CHECK - STARBUCK'S 700.00 Total: 700.00
137976 12/5/2024 12237 RAYON.KYLE December 1 , 2024 RETIREE HEALTH PAYMENT 91.00 Total: 91.00
137977 12/5/2024 15425 RENEW ELL FLEET SERVICE LLC 3729 55073 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 2,462.33 Total: 2,462.33
137978 12/5/2024 10097 ROMAINE ELECTRIC CORPORATION 12-063283 54958 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 438.20 1-389912 54958 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 257.92
Total: 696.12
137979 12/5/2024 10606 SD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT SHERIFF SEP 2024 LAW ENFORCEMENT SEP 2024 1,483,216.40 Total: 1,483,216.40
137980 12/5/2024 10407 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 04229703218; NOV24 STREET LIGHTS 44,748.37 22373580042; NOV24 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 7,334.15
Total: 52,082.52
137981 12/5/2024 10110 SECTRAN SECURITY INC 24110616 54924 FY 24/25 ARMORED CAR TRANSPC 171.66 Total: 171.66
137982 12/5/2024 10585 SHARP REES-STEALY MEDICAL 101572 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 5,542.00 101608 OMV EXAM 378.00
Total: 5,920.00
137983 12/5/2024 12313 SINGH, YU-CHI CLAIRE ASCE-100324 ASCE CONVENTION 2024 REIMBUF 322.20 Total: 322.20
137984 12/5/2024 12223 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 145137809-001 54925 IRRIGATION PARTS 2,577.40

Page 15 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/05/2024 12:00:18PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
137984 12/5/2024 12223 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC (Continued) 147634600-001 54925
147928722-001 54925
148225818-001 54925
148300894-001 54925
137985 12/5/2024 10837 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SIGNAL 83824 54948 83825 54948
83826 54955
83827 54955
83828 54955
83829 54955
83830 54955
83831 54948
83833 54948
83834 54955
83835 54955
137986 12/5/2024 11056 STANDARD ELECTRONICS 1715 54879
51270 54879
137987 12/5/2024 10217 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 6016604388 54869 137988 12/5/2024 10027 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 774345
137989 12/5/2024 10119 STEVEN SMITH LANDSCAPE INC 2830 54812 2838 54812
2840 54812
2843 54812
2846 54900
2896 54812
2897 54900
Description/Account

IRRIGATION PARTS

IRRIGATION PARTS
Total:

DIG ALERTS

TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SERVICE CALLE

DIG ALERTS

TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SERVICE CALLE

TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PROSPECT/FAN
KNOCKDOWN - MGR & CARL TON ITRAFFIC SIGNAL - SERVICE CALL� KNOCKDOWN AT MAST BLVD. & EP
Total:

FIRE ALARM & SPRINKLER MON ITC

FIRE ALARM & SPRINKLER MON ITC
Total:

FY 24/25 OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINAt
Total:

FINGERPRINT APPS
Total:

A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
Amount
627.72
1,848.54
512.18
938.33
6,504.17
585.00
820.00
1,422.84
835.11
329.92
176.05
1,209.18
2,827.06
5,844.35
998.00
8,066.28
23,113.79
695.63
1,258.00
1,953.63
106.59
106.59
160.00
160.00
435.44
272.15
435.44
435.44
220.00
59,925.88
21,760.00

Page 16 ends

vchlist
12/05/2024 12:00:18PM
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher
137989
137990
137991
137992
137993
137994
137995
Date ------------------
Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount ----------------- -----'---------------- 12/5/2024 10119 STEVEN SMITH LANDSCAPE INC
12/5/2024 15445 TAYLOR MORRISON OF CA LLC
12/5/2024 10250 THE EAST COUNTY
12/5/2024 12276 VARGAS, CROSSBY
12/5/2024 10148 WESTAIR GASES EQUIPMENT INC
12/5/2024 12930 WILLIAMS, ROCHELLE
12/5/2024 12641 WITTORFF, VICKY DENISE
53 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
53 Vouchers in this report
(Continued)
2902
2913
2914
2915
2918
2921
2922
2923
2928
2929
17428
00146779
101
0011926414
December 1, 2024
December 1 , 2024
54900
54812
54812
54900
54812
54901
54812
54812
54812
54901
54941
A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 3 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 3 LANDSCAPE SERVICES

REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT
Total:

Total:

PUBLIC HEARING PUBLICATION
Total:

HOLIDAY LIGHING ENTERTAINMEN
Total:

WELDING SUPPLIES
3,498.00
6,966.10
9,783.50
216.00
20,859.60
864.00
9,783.50
6,966.10
2,581.44
440.00
145,442.59
8,911.56
8,911.56
514.50
514.50
225.00
225.00

36.53 Total : 36.53
RETIREE HEALTH PAYMENTS 91.00
Total : 91.00
RETIREE HEALTH PAYMENTS 31.00
Total : 31.00
Bank total : 1,861,843.24
Total vouchers : 1,861,843.24

Page 17 ends

vchlist
12/05/2024 12:00:18PM
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor
Date
Pceparndby�� Approved by: �
Date: __________ _ ,vt s-/V(
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice -------PO# Description/Account Amount

Page 18 ends

vchlist
12/12/2024 11 :27:28AM
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher
719872
Date Vendor
12/9/2024 12774 LIABILITY CLAIMS ACCOUNT
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by:.__.,_\ ==a1,\.-L--J1r).,._.l"-'...._c_ih�-'---t....-r/�---- App
Dat
Date:
e:
r
oved by: __ l 'r-, l-"-+-,---1}, 11 � � � ____ v�l l·v)V/ Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
120924
------ PO# Description/Account

LIABILITY CLAIMS
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
Amount
2,663.26
2,663.26
2,663.26
2,663.26

Page 19 ends

vchlist
12/13/2024 10:36:13AM
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher
11639
11664
Date ------------------
Vendor
12/11/2024 10956 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
12/11/2024 10955 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
2 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
2 Vouchers in this report
Prnparndby �lh�
Date : 't:J;L Appco,eo �;�== Date: / '
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
December 24 Retiree
PPE 12/4/24
December 24 Retiree
PPE 12/4/24
PO# Description/Account

CA STATE TAX WITHHELD

CA STATE TAX WITHHELD
Total:

FED WITHHOLDING TAX

FED WITHHOLDING & MEDICARE
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
Amount

46.00 34,194.96
34,240.96
211.00
103,172.76
103,383.76
137,624.72
137,624.72

Page 20 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/11/2024 2:40:04PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
137996 12/11/2024 15087 34TH STREET INC 2024-166
137997 12/11/2024 15392 4LEAF INC J4263A 55033
J4263A-DD 55080
J4263B 55033
J4263B-DD 55080
137998 12/11/2024 14800 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 3717428421956 54827 3717428822096 54827
3717428831415 54827
3717428831419 54827
3717428922127 54827
3717428922141 54827
3717429811029 54827
137999 12/11/2024 13456 AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTROL 773708 54828 778626 54828
138000 12/11/2024 11945 BEDCO INC 16937 54991
138001 12/11/2024 10020 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP LEGAL SVCS NOV 2024 138002 12/11/2024 10031 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC AB6RA4J 55075 138003 12/11/2024 10032 CINTAS CORPORATION 694 4212042750 54844 138004 12/11/2024 10234 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 01149-2012-Rl-2024 54926 Description/Account

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
Total:

PLANNING SERVICES - CONTRACl

PLANNING SERVICES - DEVELOPE
PLANNING SERVICES - CONTRACl

PLANNING SERVICES - DEVELOPE
Total:

VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS

VEHICLE SUPPLIES

VEHICLE REPAIR PART

CR-VEHICLE PARTS RETRND

VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS
Total:

PEST CONTROL SERVICES

PEST CONTROL SERVICES
Total:

VEHICLE EQUIPMENT
Total:

LEGAL SVCS NOV 2024
Total:

COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
Total:

MISC SHOP RENTALS
Total:

GENERATOR AIR POLLUTION CON.

Total:

Amount
325.00
325.00
884.00
3,350.00
4,750.00
2,750.00
11,734.00
200.22

22.24 105.90
144.30

46.75 -169.47
172.92
522.86
135.25
195.00
330.25
4,395.41
4,395.41
66,955.61
66,955.61
1,427.69
1,427.69

90.78 90.78
1,175.00
1,175.00

Page 21 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/11/2024 2:40:04PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
138005 12/11/2024 10486 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 120524
138006 12/11/2024 10839 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 10377193 - 2024 55085 138007 12/11/2024 10046 D MAX ENGINEERING INC 8871 54849 138008 12/11/2024 14446 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 282938A-120524 FOT0177941-NRC 55040
138009 12/11/2024 10066 GLOBALSTAR USA LLC 000000080788187 138010 12/11/2024 14229 JOBSITE SUPPLY CO 84012400 54858 138011 12/11/2024 10204 LIFE ASSIST INC 1529230 54807
138012 12/11/2024 10306 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 8282025812 54478 138013 12/11/2024 15342 NAPA AUTO PARTS 950711 55003
138014 12/11/2024 10308 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 2968-252531 54864 138015 12/11/2024 10092 PHOENIX GROUP INFO SYSTEMS 102024031 54878 138016 12/11/2024 11830 RANCH EVENTS 12/06/2024 55100
138017 12/11/2024 10095 RASA 5825 54976
Description/Account

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION - CUYAMA
Total:

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PERMIT
Total:

STORMWATER PROGRAM ASSISTP
Total:

VEHICLE LEASING PROGRAM

FLEET MAINTENANCE SERVICES
Total:

SATELLITE PHONE SERVICE
Total:

CIP SUPPLIES
Total:

EMS SUPPLIES
Total:

RADIO EQUIPMENT
Total:

VEHICLE SUPPLIES
Total:

VEHICLE REPAIR PART
Total:

FY 24/25 PARKING CITE PROCESS
Total:

DEPOSIT FOR LUNCHEONS
Total:

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Amount

50.00 50.00
1,072.00
1,072.00
21,632.42
21,632.42
11,596.50
408.57
12,005.07
105.89
105.89

73.82 73.82
1,712.58
1,712.58
13,823.28
13,823.28
308.00
308.00

21.25 21.25
499.35
499.35
1,000.00
1,000.00
565.00

Page 22 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/11/2024 2:40:04PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 138017 12/11/2024 10095 RASA (Continued)
5827 54976 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,400.00
5834 54976 MAP CHECK -ANIMAL SHELTER 700.00
Total: 2,665.00
138018 12/11/2024 10097 ROMAINE ELECTRIC CORPORATION 12-063283-1 54958 VEHICLE SUPPLIES 665.68 Total: 665.68
138019 12/11/2024 15246 SAFE LITE AUTO GLASS 06064-063060 54954 VEHICLE REPAIR 505.69 Total: 505.69
138020 12/11/2024 10768 SANTEE SCHOOL DISTRICT 9617 54810 TEEN CENTER BUS TRANSPORTAl 215.04 9618 54923 FIELD LIGHTING 18.00
Total: 233.04
138021 12/11/2024 15408 SIX DEGREES CONSULTING 4433 55050 SPAM FILTER SOFTWARE 4,719.21 Total: 4,719.21
138022 12/11/2024 10217 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 6015024007 54897 STAPLES 155.44 6017350200 54870 OFFICE SUPPLIES -P&B , E 252.63
Total: 408.07
138023 12/11/2024 13142 DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIF 11202024 SECTION 6 GRANT REFUND 5,716.26 Total: 5,716.26
138024 12/11/2024 10617 STATE OF CALIFORNIA L0167453392 UNEMPLOYMENT 9/30/24 667.00 Total: 667.00
138025 12/11/2024 10119 STEVEN SMITH LANDSCAPE INC 2942 54900 A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 10,223.78 2945 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 16,672.20
2947 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 244.94
2949 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 544.30
2950 54901 A 3 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 165.00
2954 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 16,672.20
2958 54900 A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 220.00
2959 54900 A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 330.00
2965 54900 A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 440.00
2966 54900 A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 440.00

Page 23 ends

vchlist
12/11/2024 2:40:04PM
Bank code: ubqen
Date Vendor
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher Invoice
138025 12/11/2024 10119 10119 STEVEN SMITH LANDSCAPE INC (Continued) 138026
138027
138028
12/11/2024 10572 SUNBELT RENTALS INC
12/11/2024 14381 TAQUIZAS JOSE
12/11/2024 15091 T-MOBJLE USA INC
33 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
33 Vouchers in this report
162091018-0001
107175
993045165; NOV24
PO#
54814
55091
Description/Account
Total:

EQUIPMENT RENTAL
Total:

MILITARY SUPPORT - HMH-462 HOI
Total:

CITY HALL
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
Amount
45,952.42
724.46
724.46
3,395.00
3,395.00
1,132.00
1,132.00
206,044.09
206,044.09

Page 24 ends

vchlist
12/12/2024 11 :56:01AM
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
138029
138030
138031
138032
138033
138034
138035
138036
138037
138038
Date ----------------- Vendor Invoice ----------
12/12/2024 10334 CHLIC 3456237
12/12/2024 14793 CONTROLLING INS COST IN CA, SCHOOL 2024-12 12/12/2024 10844 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
12/12/2024 14458 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
12/12/2024 10785 RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE
12/12/2024 10424 SANTEE FIREFIGHTERS
12/12/2024 10776 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
12/12/2024 10776 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
12/12/2024 10001 US BANK
12/12/2024 14600 WASHINGTON STATE SUPPORT
10 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
10 Vouchers in this report
PPE 12/4/24
83656629
December 2024
PPE 12/4/24
PPE 12/4/24
PPE 12/4/24
PPE 12/4/24
PPE 12/4/24
PO# Description/Account

HEALTH INSURANCE
Total:

EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAI
Total:

WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:

DENTAL INSURANCE
Total:

VOLUNTARY LIFE INSURANCE
Total:

DUES/PEG/BENEVOLENT/BC EXP
Total:

WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:

PARS RETIREMENT
Total:

WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
Amount
244,855.87
244,855.87
418.29
418.29
215.02
215.02
14,611.95
14,611.95
310.58
310.58
4,843.61
4,843.61
449.53
449.53
260.30
260.30
1,549.52
1,549.52
751.84
751.84
268,266.51
268,266.51

Page 25 ends

vchlist
12/12/2024 11 :56:01AM
Bank code:

Voucher
ubqen
Date Vendor
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice -------PO# Description/Account Amount

Page 26 ends

PyBatch Payroll Processing Report
12/10/2024 8:15:57AM CITY OF SANTEE
11/21/2024 to 12/4/2024-1 Cycle b

EARNINGS SECTION DEDUCTIONS SECTION LEAVE SECTION
Type Hours/units Rate Amount Src Plan Base Wages Deduction Benefit/Cont LvPlan Accrued Taken Banked Lost sb-1 93.00
sb-3 72.08
sffa 3,654.58
sffapc 1,047.14
st1cs3 92,207.26 2,766.22 -2,766.22
st2cs3 15,855.73 475.67 -475.67
texlif 249.71
vaccpr 574.45
vaccpt 204.75
vcanpr 318.41
vcanpt 90.25
vgcipt 88.70
vghipr 15.56
vision 13,070.16 554.86
voladd 17.55
voldis 218.13
vollad 155.27
vollif 155.31
Grand 16,563.45 746,818.21 265,593.68 327,648.89 Gross: 746,818.21 Totals Net: 481,224.53
<< No Errors/ 13 Warnings >>

Page 27 ends

vchlist
12/13/2024 10:50:SOAM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
6051200
6214893
Date Vendor
12/13/2024 14704 457 MISSIONSQUARE
12/13/2024 14705 RHS MISSIONSQUARE
2 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
2 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by:� �Ii� �
Date �� Appro,ed bye 06 Date: I -
'
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
PPE 12/4/24
PPE 12/4/24
------ PO# Description/Account
ICMA-457
Total:

RETIREE HSA
Total :

Bank total:

Total vouchers
Amount
40,776.10
40,776.10
5,006.53
5,006.53
45,782.63
45,782.63

Page 28 ends

vchlist
12/17/2024 10:41 :21AM
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher
12243
Date ------------------ Vendor ---------- Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount -------------------- ------ 12/17/2024 10353 PERS
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
Pceparnd b:-J;M,c_k
Date �14 Appro,ed by"= Date: ..-I
12 24 3 RETIREMENT PAYMENT
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
159,169.98
159,169.98
159,169.98
159,169.98

Page 29 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/18/2024 12:00:43PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 138039 12/18/2024 15008 AETNA BEDER HEALTH OF CA ACID 4704 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 122.57 Total: 122.57
138040 12/18/2024 15443 AFICS ACID 14263 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 1,095.00 Total: 1,095.00
138041 12/18/2024 13456 AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTROL 776155 54828 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 632.65 Total: 632.65
138042 12/18/2024 10017 BAY CITY ELECTRIC WORKS W305120 55024 GENERATOR MAINT & REPAIRS (01 287.70 Total: 287.70
138043 12/18/2024 12349 CHOICE LOCKSMITHING 1114240PS 54843 LOCKSMITH SERVICES - AS NEED! 436.07 Total: 436.07
138044 12/18/2024 10032 CINTAS CORPORATION 694 4212770340 54844 STATION SUPPLIES 53.31 4212908564 54844 MISC SHOP RENTALS 74.14
Total: 127.45
138045 12/18/2024 14996 COMMUNITY HEALTH GROUP ACID 13823 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 431.00 ACID 14256 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 481.54
Total: 912.54
138046 12/18/2024 14996 COMMUNITY HEALTH GROUP (CA CAI ACID 13696 REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING 353.00 Total: 353.00
138047 12/18/2024 11002 CONTEMPORARY CYBERNETICS GROUP 818258 55082 COMPUTER HARD DRIVES 2,751.00 Total: 2,751.00
138048 12/18/2024 15413 COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS 71044 55099 PLUMBING REPAIRS & RELATED M 4,460.40 71063 55099 PLUMBING REPAIRS & RELATED M 4,030.00
Total: 8,490.40
138049 12/18/2024 10333 COX COMMUNICATIONS 094486701; DEC24 CITY HALL GROUP BILL 3,383.78 Total: 3,383.78
138050 12/18/2024 10046 D MAX ENGINEERING INC 8896 54850 SANTEE 24-25 CONSTRUCTION IN! 2,838.61

Page 30 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/18/2024 12:00:43PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
138050 12/18/2024 10046 10046 D MAX ENGINEERING INC (Continued) 138051 12/18/2024 10449 DAY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION INV849345 138052 12/18/2024 12655 DELL MARKETING LP 10767180238
138053 12/18/2024 14811 DIGITECH COMPUTER LLC 60006466
138054 12/18/2024 12483 DISCOUNT SIGNS AND BANNERS 5773 138055 12/18/2024 10368 FIREWORKS & STAGE FXAMERICA 22589 138056 12/18/2024 10490 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES INC 64058
64424
64969
65367
138057 12/18/2024 10070 HAWTHORNE CAT MACHINERY PS020065267 138058 12/18/2024 15015 KAISER ACID 15239
ACID 16471
ACID 16633
ACID 6695
ACID 7882
138059 12/18/2024 15015 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN- ACID 12301 138060 12/18/2024 15015 KAISER (CAID HMO) ACID 19881
PO# Description/Account
Total:
54853 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
Total:
54982 LAPTOP FOR COMMUNITY SERVIC
Total:
54998 SLEMSA BILLING CONTRACT SER\
Total:
54854 IDENTIFICATION DECALS
Total:
55055 HOLIDAY LIGHTING
Total:
54461 COMPREHENSIVE DEV IMPACT FE
54461 COMPREHENSIVE DEV IMPACT FE
54461 COMPREHENSIVE DEV IMPACT FE
54461 COMPREHENSIVE DEV IMPACT FE
Total:
54883 VEHICLE REPAIR PART
Total:

REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING

REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING
Total:

REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING
Amount
2,838.61
912.00
912.00
2,034.79
2,034.79
56,216.92
56,216.92

16.16 16.16
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,782.50
3,243.75
3,735.00
5,040.00
14,801.25
401.05
401.05
843.46
973.65
1,385.92
1,000.00
2,905.00
7,108.03
1,213.00
1,213.00
956.68

Page 31 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/18/2024 12:00:43PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code : ubQen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
138060 12/18/2024 15015 15015 KAISER (CAID HMO) (Continued) 138061 12/18/2024 13558 KIFER HYDRAULICS CO, INC 84456 54888 84467 54888
138062 12/18/2024 10906 KRONOS INC 12330624 55045
138063 12/18/2024 10204 LIFE ASSIST INC 1531453 54807
1531456 54807
1532414 54807
138064 12/18/2024 13155 LIFETIME DOG TRAINING, LLC 5012 138065 12/18/2024 15442 MCPHIE, MARILYN 1
138066 12/18/2024 10507 GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SVCS 37979244; DEC24 138067 12/18/2024 15062 MOLINA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNI ACID 10308 138068 12/18/2024 15062 MOLINA (MCR) ACID 1710
138069 12/18/2024 10306 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 8282031720 54478 138070 12/18/2024 10083 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IN2158593 54861 138071 12/18/2024 13369 NATIONWIDE MEDICAL IN40729 54808 Description/Account
Total:

VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS

VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS
Total:

SOFTWARE UPGRADE
Total:

EMS SUPPLIES

EMS SUPPLIES
Total:

INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
Total:

SENIOR HOLIDAY LUNCHEON ENTI
Total:

MITEL MXE Ill CONTROLLER SATA !
Total:

REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING
Total:

RADIO EQUIPMENT
Total:

EQUIPMENT SERVICE
Total:

MEDICAL SUPPLIES
Total:

Amount
956.68
463.68

81.19 544.87
10,560.00
10,560.00
1,293.01
768.21
624.15
2,685.37
2,814.00
2,814.00
200.00
200.00
1,588.52
1,588.52
1,093.24
1,093.24
375.11
375.11
823.90
823.90
1,623.45
1,623.45
794.89
794.89

Page 32 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/18/2024 12:00:43PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
138072 12/18/2024 13509 NCA ENTERTAINMENT INC 112224 55083 138073 12/18/2024 15025 NIGRO & NIGRO PC 21267 54980
138074 12/18/2024 10344 PADRE DAM MUNICIPAL WATER DIST 29700015; NOV24 90000366; NOV24
138075 12/18/2024 15343 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 2128-3 138076 12/18/2024 11830 RANCH EVENTS 12/12/24 55100
138077 12/18/2024 10259 ROBERT HALF 64355899 55092
138078 12/18/2024 10096 ROGER DANIEL'S ALIGN & BRAKE 59409 54866 138079 12/18/2024 15020 SHARP COMMUNITY MEDICAL GRP ACID 11722 ACID 13141
138080 12/18/2024 15037 SHARP REES-STEALY MEDICAL GROU ACID 9863 138081 12/18/2024 15444 SHONK, SANDRA ACID 12771
138082 12/18/2024 11056 STANDARD ELECTRONICS 1933 54879 138083 12/18/2024 10217 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 6017480948 54897 Description/Account

HOLIDAY LIGHTING RIDES
Total:

SLEMSA AUDIT FYE JUNE 30, 2024
Total:

CONSTRUCTION METER

GROUP BILL
Total:

QUADIENT POSTAGE FUNDING
Total:

CATERING SERVICES
Total:

TEMP SVCS - IT SUPPORT SPECIAi
Total:

VEHICLE SERVICE
Total:

REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING

REFUND - AMBULANCE BILLING
Total:

FIRE ALARM & SPRINKLER MON ITC
Total:

OFFICE SUPPLIES
Total:

Amount
2,000.00
2,000.00
4,500.00
4,500.00
-18.62
42,047.05
42,028.43
195.45
195.45
8,148.95
8,148.95
1,300.00
1,300.00

67.50 67.50
302.43
305.06
607.49
360.90
360.90
133.49
133.49
290.00
290.00

66.13 66.13

Page 33 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/18/2024 12:00:43PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 138084 12/18/2024 10749 STATE WATER RESOURCES SW-0302335 WATER RESOURCES PERMIT FEE 27,293.00 Total: 27,293.00
138085 12/18/2024 10119 STEVEN SMITH LANDSCAPE INC 2944 54900 A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 10,763.50 2946 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 1,857.92
2948 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 326.58
2957 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 326.58
2967 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 244.94
2968 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 217.72
2972 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 18,576.00
2975 54812 A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 5,263.20
Total: 37,576.44
138086 12/18/2024 14737 STURM, AARON 0522 CONFERENCE REIMBURSEMENT - 897.10 Total: 897.10
138087 12/18/2024 10572 SUNBELT RENTALS INC 162461550-0001 54814 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 2,135.43 Total: 2,135.43
138088 12/18/2024 11947 SWARCO MCCAIN INC INV0283599 55030 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LEXAN CIRCUIT E 1,164.78 Total: 1,164.78
138089 12/18/2024 13451 TELEFLEX FUNDING LLC 9509256684 54815 EMS SUPPLIES 1,433.08 Total: 1,433.08
138090 12/18/2024 15120 THE WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION 869200 54912 SECURITY ALARM SERVICES 239.40 869202 54912 SECURITY ALARM SERVICES 359.40
Total: 598.80
138091 12/18/2024 10165 TRAD AM ENTERPRISES INC 418 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 471.00 Total: 471.00
138092 12/18/2024 12480 UNITED SITE SERVICES 114-13976609 55056 PORTABLE TOILET, FENCE & SINK 342.37 114-13976610 55056 PORTABLE TOILET, FENCE & SINK 525.82 Total : 868.19
138093 12/18/2024 10136 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 218083-A 54816 URBAN FORESTRY MANAGEMENT 3,505.35 221309 54816 URBAN FORESTRY MANAGEMENT 1,236.25

Page 34 ends

vchlist
12/18/2024 12:00:43PM
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher
138093
138094
1380
1 95
Date Vendor
12/18/2024 10136 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC
12/18/2024 14687 WEX BANK
12/18/2024 15456 WOODMARK CONSTRUCTION
57 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
57 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by:�,""":.J_____,,,.....A�-tr/....,\�.....,.�--lb-'1-4--------=�--- Date: _ -t-+j 'J;-, 1-IH-0,vf �
Approve
Date:-d by---
:
-- C:--C----
(2--r 1tj2,t(
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
(Continued)
221929
101524099
6919-2024
PO# Description/Account
54816 FY24/25 URBAN FORESTRY MANA<
Total:

FLEET CARD FUELING
Total:

BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers :

Amount
337.80
5,079.40
14,784.27
14,784.27
108.00
108.00
282,301.83
282,301.83

Page 35 ends

vchlist
12/19/2024 1:21:53PM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
----------------- Invoice
138097 12/19/2024 10001 US BANK 0000136401
000024
000064
000182
00030905
00077869
0009816
0037-0041
008124
012048
012356
0129-0029-0029
013984
014322
014840
014866
0160253
016244
016424
0184660-IN
0196421
0196424
019878
0200231
020829
025247
029299
030492
031561
032134
033314 -
035706
038152
044344
049632
0519552
PO# Description/Account Amount
APWA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL - S 273.00
WELLNESS EVENT 150.00
WELLNESS 2,301.30
MEETING SUPPLIES 58.80
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 62.89
MISS SANTEE SUPPLIES 51.70
WELLNESS SUPPLIES 28.96
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 67.60
WASHING EVENT SUPPLIES 20.00
SUPPLIES 15.96
WELLNESS 9.66
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 70.00
MEETING SUPPLIES 19.96
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 13.76
WELLNESS SUPPLIES 10.78
SENIOR SUPPLIES 75.48
APPARATUS EQUIPMENT 86.16
WELLNESS SUPPLIES 13.20
WELLNESS 10.78
DEPARTMENTAL BADGES 250.07
DEPARTMENTAL BADGES 707.67
DEPARTMENTAL BADGES 284.36
SUPPLIES 72.78
VEHICLE SUPPLIES 17.00
SENIOR SUPPLIES 22.00
3RD GRADE POSTER CONTEST 150.10
EVENT MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 15.00
SUPPLIES 30.03
TEEN CENTER SUPPLIES 81.52
HOLIDAY LIGHTING SUPPLIES 16.16
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 17.50
TEEN CENTER SUPPLIES 45.78
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 17.50
WELLNESS 14.92
OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.40
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 18.29

Page 36 ends

vchlist
12/19/2024 1 :21 :53PM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
138097
Date Vendor
12/19/2024 10001 US BANK
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
(Continued)
052200
057219
061412
062407
066631
0670612
07162024
0720228
079049
07EAB5C5-B6
0804265
080997
081020
084597
0857064
089202
091358
094386
0949058
0949058-3
0949058-4
097983
100204
1015629
1024
102408
1030
1046632781 CR
1047968
10481180
11012024
1113150562-24
1114242
11152024CR
111524
1115242
PO# Description/Account Amount
VEHICLE SUPPLIES 59.24
SUPPLIES 202.56
MEETING AND OFFICE SUPPLIES 71.01
SENIOR SUPPLIES 97.74
WELLNESS 67.62
OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.62
ICC SD MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL - ! 150.00
STATION SUPPLIES 780.00
SENIOR SUPPLIES 27.53
MEETING SUPPLIES 14.48
STATION SUPPLIES 208.32
SENIOR SUPPLIES 22.76
SUPPLIES 12.30
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 223.16
GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 28.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.30
WELLNESS SUPPLIES 20.75
MEETING SUPPLIES 18.65
BREWS & BITES SUPPLIES 135.72
BREWS & BITES RETURNED ITEM� -67.86
BREWS & BITES RETURNED ITEM� -33.93
STATION SUPPLIES 738.24
REGISTRATION FEE FOR FIRE MAF 650.00
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 118.20
WASH EVENT SUPPLIES 20.00
TRAFFIC SUPPLIES 95.00
MILITARY SUPPORT 1,751.00
REFUND OF ASCE CONFERENCE - -795.00
TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 8.99
WELLNESS SUPPLIES 133.55
EVENT PROMOTION 90.00
ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD SU 99.99
CONFERENCE TRANSPORTATION 9.36
CREDIT - LAMINATED POCKET FOL -36.62
CONFERENCE TRANSPORTATION 8.09
CONFERENCE TRANSPORTATION 7.95

Page 37 ends

vchlist
12/19/2024 1:21:53PM
Bank code : ubqen
Date Vendor
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher Invoice
138097
-----------------
12/19/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
1115243
1144
117755
119043
12336
1252205
13328696
1396210
141976
1504
15099
15100
1530619
157345
15772
161704
162500
189255
200015463
200015469
2015466
2024411586
2025567
2025569
203007708
20690
224993
22750125-1
23138
23SPFD
2412-0130-0036-0040
24-24208
24-24384
267407
27500
2798638
PO# Description/Account Amount
CONFERENCE TRANSPORTATION 19.73
PUB ED SUPPLIES 1,998.45
EQUIPMENT RENTAL 865.13
MILITARY SUPPORT SUPPLIES 1,383.12
MEETING SUPPLIES 21.76
LIGHT POLE BANNER BRACKETS 297.85
WINTER PROGRAM MARKETING 597.00
LIGHT POLE BANNER BRACKETS 297.85
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 18.92
MEETING REGISTRATION 20.00
LODGING 541.65
LODGING 541.65
OFFICE SUPPLIES 45.24
MEETING SUPPLIES 8.75
CPR CERTIFICATION 10.50
BUILDING CODES BOOK - STURM 708.00
BUILDING CODES BOOK - YALE 698.21
CAMERA FOR PASSPORTS 350.13
CAPPO SD CHAPTER MEETING 15.00
CAPPO SD CHAPTER MTG 10/29 30.00
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 45.21
COUNTY OF SD - RECORDED DOC 0.45
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 99.61
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 28.34
EVENT MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 1,175.00
SENIOR BUS TRIP 1,330.00
TAX FORMS AND ENVELOPES 931.97
CONFERENCE 1,113.27
RESCUE EQUIPMENT 1,893.79
SUPPLIES 105.78
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 135.20
CODE BLUE COURTESY VEHICLE r 179.78
BUILDING FORMS 114.67
MILITARY SUPPORT 510.00
REFUND OF CODE SUPPLIES -16.15
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 27.99

Page 38 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/19/2024 1:21:53PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ub!=jen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 138097 12/19/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
2813838 LARGE MAP FRAMES 260.74
29100053 EVENT BANNERS 110.14
291547483 COUNTY OF SD - RECORDED DOC 0.01
29215 MEETING DUES 30.00
2979405 OFFICE SUPPLIES 38.06
2979405-2 OFFICE SUPPLIES 99.37
2979405-3 OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.47
300015774 ANNUAL CSMFO MEMBERSHIP 150.00
300015809 CSMFO ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 150.00
3165783 GOVERNMENTAL GAAP UPDATE 180.00
3165787 GFOA TRAINING BUDGET GAMES 75.00
321733 WEARING APPAREL 12.00
322191 WEARING APPAREL 70.00
3226204 STATION MAINTENANCE 32.11
322721 WEARING APPAREL 97.00
3251 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 100.00
32687330 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118.64
33639 PUB ED SUPPLIES 634.28
3394736297 DOMAIN NAME RENEWAL 22.17
3402478997 DOMAIN NAME RENEWAL 46.34
3486712 APA MEMBERSHIP - LINDEBREKKE 118.16
3515198 MATERIAL & SUPPLIES 32.29
3520333 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 64.36
3535818616 MMASC CONFERENCE LODGING 1,041.36
35694W PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 645.00
3747403 STAFF SUPPLIES 24.47
3790660 MEDIC UNIT SUPPLIES 164.32
3820257 OFFICE SUPPLIES 39.20
389555 ICC SD ACCESSIBILITY COMMITIE 15.00
4013195 STATION SUPPLIES 151.55
4036989 STATION SUPPLIES 97.55
4221019 HOLIDAY LIGHTING SUPPLIES 78.63
4433047 OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.29
448996 CONFERENCE TRANSPORTATION 17.72
4510818 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 157.28
4510819 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 34.39

Page 39 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/19/2024 1:21:53PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 138097 12/19/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
4515509 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 84.89
4520091 RECREATION SUPPLIES 18.25
4693802 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 32.31
4707834 TRANSPORTATION CHARGE 170.82
4730 TRAINING REGISTRATION 50.00
47444 CAL CHIEFS PLANNING WRKSHP 316.40
47UCPT CERTIFICATION AIRFARE 223.96
47UV2T CERTIFICATION AIRFARE 223.96
4802645 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 123.55
4903 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 445.00
5036202 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 104.35
5055462-1 BREWS & BITES SUPPLIES 101.79
5055462-2 BREWS & BITES SUPPLIES 33.93
5055462-3 RETURNED BREWS & BITES ITEME -67.86
5055462-4 RETURNED BREWS & BITES ITEM� -33.93
50621 WELLNESS 342.07
5092223 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.68
5123269581 SUBSCRIPTION 100.80
530001 SENIOR TRIP EVENT 45.68
5522982 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 54.84
5603372 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 32.22
58829 EMAIL MARKETING SOFTWARE 350.00
6013815 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 37.45
601624 SHIPPING CHARGE 27.45
6024794 MEDIC UNIT SUPPLIES 222.78
61418 WELLNESS 74.98
6289 STATION SUPPLIES 668.49
6389813 AMAZON 101.39
6389813-B AMAZON 279.68
6389813CR REFUND -279.68
6469003 OFFICE FURNITURE - P&B 177.79
6737800 HOLIDAY LIGHTING SUPPLIES 128.97
6757055 OFFICE FURNITURE - P&B 185.50
7028262 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 10.76
70306 WELLNESS SUPPLIES 35.91
7256233 OFFICE SUPPLIES 85.09

Page 40 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/19/2024 1:21:53PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount 138097 12/19/2024 10001 US BANK (Continued)
734120488 EVENT MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 48.42
734134925 EVENT MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 37.66
734135000 EVENT MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 179.90
7361865 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 21.53
7391424 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.49
742301-01 VEHICLE EQUIPMENT 579.37
7468225 OFFICE SUPPLIES 85.12
7468225-CR CR-OFFICE SUPPLIES RETRND -85.12
749546 CONFERENCE TRANSPORTATION 8.89
7500C76579 RENEWAL LIC:ENSE FEE 180.00
75146 SPECIAL EVENT FACEBOOK BOOS 50.00
7603069 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 67.75
7832259 TRAFFIC SUPPLIES 24.41
79340 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 160.55
8024279 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 590.48
80245 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 40.00
8036681 SMALL TOOLS 96.91
8080237 OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.38
8091401 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 68.50
8234382 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 27.99
8271422 LIGHT POLE BANNER BRACKETS 297.85
8520311 VANDALISM REPAIRS 38.63
852982 CONFERENCE TRANSPORTATION 59.79
8606237 GRAFFITI REMOVAL SUPPLIES 32.70
866 EVENT SUPPLIES 51.66
8737062 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 65.92
88032607 GENERAL EVENT SUPPLIES 130.54
88844 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 11.83
89086 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 81.95
8933829 CODE SUPPLIES 33.60
9023975 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 375.95
9257741 SENIOR TRIPS 720.00
93345 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 94.67
9466615 OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.04
9524283 SMALL TOOLS 12.36
9525839 STATION SUPPLIES 85.11

Page 41 ends

vchlist
12/19/2024 1:21:53PM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher
138097
Date Vendor
12/19/2024 10001 US BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
1 Vouchers in this report
Prepared by:_',,_,,___U{-c........c->,.<->A ..... c=-J/t1�-,---,-t,,=/------ Date: ___ �.1 �......,v,1-r-/a�,
•£.....,,..l+ ��
Approved by:---------�--=-�-�-
Date: ___ l'�\,\v4
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Invoice
(Continued)
95438
9569801
95912
95918
9754647
9849856
99048
99053
99260
99261
A258127
A258128
A258129
A258132
AA322B
AS98J
CPRS-2024-CG
RP053172147
PO# Description/Account

MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
3RD GRADE POSTER CONTEST

MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

OFFICE SUPPLIES

STATION SUPPLIES

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

CPRS CONFERENCE

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE

MMASC CONFERENCE TRANSPOR

CPRS CONFERENCE LODGING

MEMBERSHIP

SMALL TOOLS
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
Amount

12.37 43.24

73.21 336.72

62.27 140.06
495.00
495.00
750.00
750.00

80.00 80.00

80.00 80.00
130.00
1,085.02
137.88
154.91
45,181.32
45,181.32
45,181.32

Page 42 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/26/2024 1:52:36PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
138098 12/26/2024 14800 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 3717435123401 54827 138099 12/26/2024 10292 ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 258825 54830 138100 12/26/2024 13321 ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE 0009757A-IN 55105 0009757-IN 54412
138101 12/26/2024 10510 AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC 1949420789 138102 12/26/2024 11445 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1072898YL
138103 12/26/2024 15380 ANDERSON, MARK 1113
138104 12/26/2024 10412 AT&T 000022628829
138105 12/26/2024 10516 AWARDS BY NAVAJO 1124219
1124277
138106 12/26/2024 14306 AZTEC LANDSCAPING INC J1933 54798 J1946 54798
138107 12/26/2024 13292 BORDER RECAPPING LLC 24-0232160-008 54818 24-0232164-008 54818
138108 12/26/2024 10876 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC 4040899327 54839 Description/Account

VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS
Total:

SAFETY APPAREL
Total:

ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS

ENCAMPMENT CLEAN UPS
Total:

CLOUD STORAGE SERVICES
Total:

FD PAGER SERVICE
Total:

INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
Total:

TELEPHONE
Total:

OFFICE SUPPLIES

OFFICE SUPPLIES
Total:

CUSTODIAL SERVICES - PARKS

CUSTODIAL SERVICES - PARKS
Total:

VEHICLE REPAIR

VEHICLE SUPPLIES
Total:

PLOTTER MAINTENANCE & USAGE
Total:

Amount
554.44
554.44
819.08
819.08
5,668.08
2,983.20
8,651.28
100.00
100.00
219.31
219.31
384.00
384.00
910.80
910.80

28.00 28.00

56.00 4,972.43
661.93
5,634.36
360.64
1,475.12
1,835.76
166.73
166.73

Page 43 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/26/2024 1:52:36PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
138109 12/26/2024 11402 CARROLL, JUDI 01012025-96
138110 12/26/2024 12349 CHOICE LOCKSMITHING 121124BRP 54843 138111 12/26/2024 10032 CINTAS CORPORATION 694 4213449464 54844 4214130999 54844
138112 12/26/2024 11409 CLAYTON, SYLVIA 01012025-340
138113 12/26/2024 15457 COLE, JEAN 387162
138114 12/26/2024 12153 CORODATA RECORDS RS7047481 54996 138115 12/26/2024 11862 CORODATA SHREDDING INC DN1498348 138116 12/26/2024 10358 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 25CTOFSAN05 25CTOFSASN05 54908
138117 12/26/2024 15413 COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS 71197 55099 71212 55099
138118 12/26/2024 10333 COX COMMUNICATIONS 052335901; DEC24 064114701; DEC24
138119 12/26/2024 11457 D'ALESIO INC 27964 54851
138120 12/26/2024 13129 DAVID TURCH AND ASSOCIATES 12102024 54881 Description/Account

MEADOWBROOK HARDSH(P PRO(
Total:

LOCKSMITH SERVICES
Total:

MISC SHOP RENTALS

MISC FLEET RENTALS
Total:

MEADOWBROOK HARDSHIP PRO(
Total:

EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:

RECORD STORAGE,RETRIEVAL&D
Total:

CORODATA SHEDDING
Total:

SHERIFF RADIOS
800 MHZ ACCESS F.EES
Total:

PLUMBING REPAIRS & RELATED M

PLUMBING REPAIRS & RELATED M
Total:
8950 COTTONWOOD AVE
8115 ARLETTE ST
Total:

WEARING APPAREL
Total:

HWY 52 COALITION CONSULTING I
Amount
147.64
147.64
218.19
218.19

74.14 74.14
148.28
154.50
154.50

62.00 62.00
934.20
934.20

17.95 17.95
2,714.00
2,094.50
4,808.50
2,125.57
1,201.34
3,326.91
196.68
194.90
391.58
598.32
598.32
5,000.00

Page 44 ends

vchlist
12/26/2024 1 :52:36PM
Bank code : ubqen
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher
138120
Date ----------------- ----------Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount -------__ __..: __________ ------ 138121
138122
138123
138124
138125
138126
138127
138128
138129
138130
138131
12/26/2024 13129 13129 DAVID TURCH AND ASSOCIATES (Continued) 12/26/2024 12655 DELL MARKETING LP
12/26/2024 14675 EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL
12/26/2024 12593 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY, LLC
12/26/2024 11119 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
12/26/2024 10009 FIRE ETC
12/26/2024 15446 FOCUS PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICE
12/26/2024 12638 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY, INC.
12/26/2024 11881 GOODEN, CHRIS
12/26/2024 11196 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES
12/26/2024 14785 HEARTLAND FIRE
12/26/2024 15440 IDIQ
10782604225
10788926373
20241211C
2024-12-07
SC651231
194709
SANTEE2024-11
INV1030297
CPRS-2025-CG
9232149399
9232208585
2132
ACA38-SANTEE
IDIQ8514
54627
54627
54681
54917
55000
54855
55094
54803
54803
55108
Total:

MONTHLY WEBSITE HOSTING FEE

MONTHLY WEBSITE HOSTING FEE
Total:

ARPA FUNDED SHELTER SERVICE!
Total:

LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICE
Total:

PLUMBING SUPPLIES
5,000.00
453.30
445.26
898.56
10,020.00
10,020.00
1,500.00
1,500.00

37.54 Total : 37.54
SAFETY APPAREL 738.09
Total: 738.09
COUNSELING SERVICES 800.00
Total: 800.00
ADMIN - LIABILITY CLAIM 1,500.00
Total: 1,500.00
PER DIEM PLAYGROUND SAFETY I 322.00
322.00

STATION SUPPLIES

STATION SUPPLIES
HFTA FY 24-25 2ND QTR
38TH FIRE ACADEMY

ID PROTECTION
Total:

Total:

Total:
956.41
355.79
1,312.20
12,766.00
3,046.00
15,812.00
558.90
Total : 558.90

Page 45 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/26/2024 1:52:36PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
138132 12/26/2024 11807 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY 001 8748090-001 54804 138133 12/26/2024 13558 KIFER HYDRAULICS CO, INC 84621 54888 138134 12/26/2024 13345 KING, ERIC CPRS-2025-EK
138135 12/26/2024 10912 LEASK, DAVID 19796W
138136 12/26/2024 10204 LIFE ASSIST INC 1532891 54807
1533216 54807
1533503 54807
1535166 54807
1535278 54807
138137 12/26/2024 10154 MCDOUGAL BOEHMER FOLEY LYON 110955 138138 12/26/2024 14208 MINUTEMAN PRESS EL CAJON 66577 55046 138139 12/26/2024 12715 MORGAN, JEFF 0314625
138140 12/26/2024 13369 NATIONWIDE MEDICAL IN40801 54808 138141 12/26/2024 10308 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 2968-256659 54864 138142 12/26/2024 10344 PADRE DAM MUNICIPAL WATER DIST 90000367; DEC24 138143 12/26/2024 14614 PARADIGM MECHANICAL CORP 6858 54821 Description/Account

IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
Total:

VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS
Total:

PER DIEM PLAYGROUND SAFETY I
Total:

EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:

EMS SUPPLIES

CR-EMS SUPPLIES RETURNED

EMS SUPPLIES

EMS SUPPLIES
Total:

SLEMSA LEGAL SERVICES NOVEM
Total:

BUS CARDS
Total:

WORK BOOT REIMBURSEMENT
Total:

EMS SUPPLIES
Total:

VEHICLE REPAIR PART
Total:

GROUP BILL
Total:

HVAC MAINT & REPAIRS
Amount
1,069.75
1,069.75
153.58
153.58
322.00
322.00
250.00
250.00
1,916.99
1,582.30
-1,739.77
456.98
1,894.52
4,111.02
420.00
420.00
107.18
107.18
200.00
200.00
350.70
350.70

45.79 45.79
33,697.63
33,697.63
133.66

Page 46 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/26/2024 1:52:36PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
138143 12/26/2024 14614 PARADIGM MECHANICAL CORP (Continued) 6859 54821
6860 54821
6861 54821
6862 54821
6863 54821
6864 54821
6865 54821
6866 54821
6868 54821
6869 54821
6870 54821
6871 54821
6872 54821
6880 54821
6937 54821
138144 12/26/2024 12904 PAT DAVIS DESIGN GROUP INC 8034 54893 138145 12/26/2024 11442 PATIERSON, EDWARD 01012025-225
138146 12/26/2024 10150 PROBUILD 04-0387555 54934
138147 12/26/2024 10101 PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL SUPPLY 26497 55048 138148 12/26/2024 12147 PRO-LINE INDUSTRIAL 1009914 55089 138149 12/26/2024 12062 PURETEC INDUSTRIAL WATER 2230878 55043 138150 12/26/2024 13592 QUADIENT LEASING USA, INC 01620557 54988 Description/Account

HVAC MAINT & REPAIRS

CR HVAC MAINT & REPAIRS
Total:

WINTER BROCHURE/GUIDE PROD
Total:

MEADOWBROOK HARDSHIP PRO(
Total:

BUILDING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
Total:

OXYGEN CYLINDER RENTAL
Total:

GRAFFITI REMOVAL PAINT
Total:

DEIONIZED WATER SERVICE
Total:

QUADIENT MAIL MACHINE LEASE
Amount
133.66
267.32
279.20
139.60
118.82
255.45
127.73
273.26
273.26
249.52
121.79
115.86
139.60
577.50
-142.55
3,063.68
7,335.00
7,335.00
142.45
142.45
517.38
517.38

8.00 8.00
2,367.61
2,367.61
306.55
306.55
1,267.42

Page 47 ends

vchlist
12/26/2024 1:52:36PM
Bank code : ubqen
Date Vendor
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher Invoice
138150 12/26/2024 13592 13592 QUADIENT LEASING USA, INC (Continued) 138151
138152
138153
138154
138155
138156
138157
138158
138159
138160
138161
138162
12/26/2024 10095 RASA
12/26/2024 10259 ROBERT HALF
12/26/2024 10096 ROGER DANIEL'S ALIGN & BRAKE
12/26/2024 10097 ROMAINE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
12/26/2024 15314 RSG INC
12/26/2024 15246 SAFELITE AUTO GLASS
12/26/2024 13061 SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY &
12/26/2024 11261 SAN DIEGO SPORTS MEDICINE
12/26/2024 10768 SANTEE SCHOOL DISTRICT
12/26/2024 13171 SC COMMERCIAL, LLC
12/26/2024 14523 SCA OF CA. LLC
12/26/2024 10110 SECTRAN SECURITY INC
5842
64370177
64413917
64440620
61030
1-392550
12697
06064-063511
DEC-24
12122024
9633
IN-0000034885
158877PS
24120615
------ PO# Description/Account Amount
54976
55092
55092
55092
54866
54958
54868
54954
54959
55044
55006
54811
54924
Total:

MAP CHECK - SANTEE HILLS
Total:

TEMP SVCS - IT SUPPORT SPECIAi
TEMP SVCS - IT SUPPORT SPECIAi
TEMP SVCS - IT SUPPORT SPECIAi
Total:

VEHICLE SERVICE
Total:

VEHICLE REPAIR PART
1,267.42
2,450.00
2,450.00
1,145.04
1,001.00
1,301.04
3,447.08
112.50
112.50

91.74 Total : 91.74
2025-29 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
Total:

VEHICLE REPAIR
Total:

ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
Total:
38TH FIRE ACADEMY
Total:

JOINT USE FIELDS - RIO SECO
Total:

DELIVERED FUEL
Total:

STREET SWEEPING SVCS
Total:

FY 24/25 ARMORED CAR TRANSPC
3,591.25
3,591.25
402.77
402.77
38,674.00
38,674.00
200.00
200.00
391.82
391.82
1,460.42
1,460.42
31,019.58
31,019.58
171.66

Page 48 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/26/2024 1:52:36PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
138162 12/26/2024 10110 10110 SECTRAN SECURITY INC (Continued) 138163 12/26/2024 13206 SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS 9005123129 54984 138164 12/26/2024 11072 SHOW STOPPER WAX PRODUCTS 6467 54896 138165 12/26/2024 12223 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 148688792-001 54925 148748221-001 54925
138166 12/26/2024 13162 SOCAL PPE SC10757 54978
138167 12/26/2024 10837 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SIGNAL 83872 54948 83873 54948
83874 54948
138168 12/26/2024 11910 SPECTRUM GAS PRODUCTS 00867366 55028 00867367 55028
138169 12/26/2024 14240 SPICER CONSULTING GROUP 1764 54687 1793 54687
138170 12/26/2024 11403 ST JOHN, LYNNE 01012025-78
138171 12/26/2024 10217 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 6018743545 54869 601874546 54870
138172 12/26/2024 10838 STATE OF CA DEPT OF INDUST REL OSIP 72329 Description/Account
Total:

SHARP COPY COUNT 2024.12
Total:

VEHICLE SUPPLIES
Total:

IRRIGATION PARTS

IRRIGATION PARTS
Total:

TURNOUT MAINTENANCE
Total:

TRAFFIC SIGNAL - MARKOUTS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - MONTHLY MAIN.

TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SERVICE CALL�
Total:

OXYGEN CYLINDER RENTALS

OXYGEN CYLINDER RENTAL
Total:

ASSMNT ENG & CFO SVCS FY 23-2
ASSMNT ENG & CFO SVCS FY 23-2
Total:

MEADOWBROOK HARDSHIP PRO(
Total:

FY 24/25 OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINAt

OFFICE SUPPLIES - P&B, E
Total:

WORK COMP ASSESSMENT
Total:

Amount
171.66
932.80
932.80
238.13
238.13
141.74

71.22 212.96
577.00
577.00
450.00
3,255.00
3,272.67
6,977.67
178.50

84.00 262.50
2,763.56
2,763.56
5,527.12
147.93
147.93
205.06

72.08 277.14
13,164.94
13,164.94

Page 49 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/26/2024 1:52:36PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
138173 12/26/2024 14623 STEPHEN WADE CHEVROLET 3276419 54899 138174 12/26/2024 10119 STEVEN SMITH LANDSCAPE INC 2985 54812 3030 54812
3031 54900
3032 54901
3043 54901
3046 54812
3047 54812
3048 54812
3049 54900
3050 54901
3051 54901
3053 54901
3054 54812
3056 54812
3057 54900
3058 54900
3059 54900
3060 54901
3070 54901
138175 12/26/2024 10880 TERRYBERRY COMPANY LLC S26496
S26497
138176 12/26/2024 10250 THE EAST COUNTY 00148330
138177 12/26/2024 10250 THE EAST COUNTY 00148105
138178 12/26/2024 15120 THE WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION 869201 54912 Description/Account

VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS
Total:

A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 3 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 3 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 3 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 3 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 3 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 1 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 2 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A3 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
A 3 LANDSCAPE SERVICES
Total:

SERVICE AWARD PINS

SERVICE AWARD PINS
Total:

CLERK OFFICE PUBLICATION PRE
Total:

NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILIT'!
Total:

SECURITY ALARM SERVICES
Total:

Amount
543.44
543.44
15,480.00
59,925.88
21,760.00
13,712.00
220.00
11,145.60
10,216.80
244.94
192.50
165.00
440.00
440.00
12,074.40
272.15
440.00
220.00
275.00
440.00
330.00
147,994.27
2,319.58
336.12
2,655.70
192.50
192.50
147.00
147.00
239.40
239.40

Page 50 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/26/2024 1:52:36PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
138179 12/26/2024 14354 TRILOGY MEDWASTE WEST, LLC 1656603 1656604
138180 12/26/2024 10133 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 1120240695 24-251880
138181 12/26/2024 12480 UNITED SITE SERVICES 114-13977752 INV-4919745
INV-4982340
138182 12/26/2024 10325 VALLEY POWER SYSTEM INC R42983
138183 12/26/2024 10475 VERIZON WIRELESS 6100837760
138184 12/26/2024 10136 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 222457 222927
138185 12/26/2024 13996 WESTERN AUDIO VISUAL 21968
138186 12/26/2024 12510 ZERO WASTE USA 741525
138187 12/26/2024 10318 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 4087948 4090226
90 Vouchers for bank code ubgen
90 Vouchers in this report
PO# Description/Account
54913 BIOMEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL
54913 BIOMEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL
Total:
54871 DIG ALERT - MONTHLY TICKETS
54871 DIG ALERTS - STATE FEES
Total:
55056 PORTABLE TOILET. FENCE & SINK
55056 PORTABLE TOILET, FENCE & SINK
55056 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAUSERVIC
Total:
54902 EMS SUPPLIES
Total:

CELL PHONE SERVICE
Total:
54816 URBAN FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
54816 URBAN FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Total:

COUNCIL CHAMBERS NV EXTEND!
Total:
55101 PET WASTE STATIONS
Total:
54817 EMS SUPPLIES
54817 EMS SUPPLIES
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
Amount
375.81
374.31
750.12
148.75

53.60 202.35
352.58
135.54
135.54
623.66
119.73
119.73
893.04
893.04
168.85
337.70
506.55
9,607.50
9,607.50
1,654.85
1,654.85
2,276.47
333.98
2,610.45
403,446.43
403,446.43

Page 51 ends

vchlist
12/26/2024 1 :52:36PM
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Voucher Date _eV _n_d o_r __________________ ln_v_oic_e _________ PO_# ______ Description/Account
Propacedby =� Date �� Appco,edby,� D�� - ,
Amount

Page 52 ends

vchlist Voucher List
12/26/2024 2:47:42PM CITY OF SANTEE
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
138188 12/26/2024 12903 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE CO 2353921B 2353922B
138189 12/26/2024 12722 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE 166579929 138190 12/26/2024 10844 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD PPE 12/18/24 138191 12/26/2024 10508 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF December 2024 138192 12/26/2024 14452 MEDICAL AIR SERVICES ASSC December 2024 138193 12/26/2024 14458 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 83656630 138194 12/26/2024 10784 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE December 2024 138195 12/26/2024 10335 SAN DIEGO FIREFIGHTERS FEDERAL December 2024 138196 12/26/2024 10424 SANTEE FIREFIGHTERS PPE 12/18/24 138197 12/26/2024 10776 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PPE 12/18/24 138198 12/26/2024 10776 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PPE 12/18/24 138199 12/26/2024 14467 TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY SMOFOU20241113001 PO# Description/Account

FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT

FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT
Total:

EYEMED - VOLUNTARY VISION
Total:

WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:

LIFE/LTD INSURANCE
Total:

MEDICAL AIR TRANSPORT SVCS
Total:

VOLUNTARY LEGAL
Total:

VOLUNTARY AD&D
Total:

LONG TERM DISABILITY-SFFA
Total:

DUES/PEC/BENEVOLENT/BC EXP
Total:

WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:

VOLUNTARY INS RIDERS
Total:

Amount
3,064.37
3,064.37
6,128.74
1,178.58
1,178.58
291.30
291.30
3,228.86
3,228.86
165.00
165.00
336.00
336.00

35.05 35.05
1,386.50
1,386.50
4,818.86
4,818.86
449.53
449.53
260.30
260.30
499.35
499.35

Page 53 ends

vchlist
12/26/2024 2:47:42PM
Bank code: ubqen
Voucher
Voucher List

CITY OF SANTEE
Date ------------------ Vendor ---------- Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount ------- ---'----------- ------ 138200
138201
12/26/2024 10001 US BANK
12/26/2024 14600 WASHINGTON STATE SUPPORT
14 Vouchers for bank code : ubgen
14 Vouchers in this report
�::�arnd by : \iu ��
Appm,ed Date: �,.� b:?-�'--,----,-----
PPE 12/18/24
PPE 12/18/24

PARS RETIREMENT
Total:

WITHHOLDING ORDER
Total:

Bank total:

Total vouchers
1,849.94
1,849.94
751.84
751.84
21,379.85
21,379.85

Page 54 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA

ACCEPTING THE CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL AND ROADWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 2024 (CIP 2024-02) PROJECT AS COMPLETE AND FINDING THE

ACTION IS NOT A PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”)
WHEREAS, the City Council awarded the construction contract for the Citywide Slurry Seal and Roadway Maintenance Program 2024 (CIP 2024-02) Project (“Project”) to American Asphalt South, Inc. on June 24, 2024 for $1,477,324.09; and WHEREAS, the City Council also authorized the Director of Engineering/City Engineer to approve construction change orders in a total amount not to exceed $369,331.00 and
WHEREAS, six change orders in the amount of $270,394.96 were approved for additional work and the resurfacing of two additional streets; and WHEREAS, an expense of $32,399.84 in design & bidding costs, $53,501.51 in construction engineering/management costs were incurred in connection with this project while the City estimates a final expense of $1,000.00 to closeout this project; and WHEREAS, $7,324.95 of the project was reimbursed by Padre Dam Municipal Water District for asphalt patching that was performed on their behalf related to their facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Project was completed for a total construction contract amount of $1,747,719.05 on November 18, 2024, $79,576.40 was expended in other related costs for a total project amount of $1,827,295.45; and
WHEREAS, American Asphalt South, Inc. has completed the project in accordance with the contract plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, per California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines Section 15378, this action is not a project under CEQA because it involves an administrative activity of government without the potential of a significant impact on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to accept the Project as complete; and WHEREAS, acceptance of the Project as complete will not result in a direct or indirect impact on the environment, is an administrative activity of government, and is therefore not a “project” under CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, that the work for the construction of the Citywide Slurry Seal and Roadway Maintenance Program 2024 (CIP 2024-02) Project is accepted as complete on this date and the City Clerk is directed to record a Notice of Completion.

SECTION 1: The work for the construction of the Citywide Slurry Seal and Roadway Maintenance Program 2024 (CIP 2024-02) Project is accepted as complete on this date.

RESOLUTION NO.

SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to record a Notice of Completion.

SECTION 3: The action is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 as it involves an administrative activity of government without the potential of a significant impact on the environment.

SECTION 4: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular meeting thereof held this 8th day of January, 2025, by the following roll call vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:

JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL AND ROADWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 2024 CIP 2024-02

PROJECT STREETS

ZONE AH

HALBERNS BLVD

SECOND ST

ZONE BA

MISSION GORGE ROAD

PROSPECT AVENUE
DISTRICT 4 ZONE FI
DISTRICT 1
DISTRICT 3
DISTRICT 2
SHEET 1 OF 1

PROJECT MAP

CUYAMACA STREET

NORTHCOTE ROAD

CHANGE ORDER STREET

RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE SANTEE-LAKESIDE

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AUTHORITY JOINT EXERCISE OF POWER

AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, on or about August 31, 2022, the City of Santee and Lakeside Fire Protection District (collectively “Parties”) entered into the Santee-Lakeside Emergency Medical Services Authority Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (“Agreement”) pursuant to Articles 1 through 4, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 6500) related to the joint exercise of power common to public agencies by the Parties to permit the joint exercise of certain powers both have in common; and
WHEREAS, the Parties are authorized to jointly exercise their powers pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, Chapter 4; Part 2, Division 2, Title 5, Sections 55631 through 55634, and Articles 1 through 4, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 (commencing with Section 6500), of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Agreement is to (1) create the Santee-Lakeside Emergency Services Joint Powers Authority; (2) to provide for the administration of the Authority; and (3) to jointly through the Authority exercise the common powers of the Parties by administrating, funding, managing and overseeing coordination of advanced life support ambulance transport services by the Member Agencies. Such purpose is accomplished and common powers exercised in the manner set forth in the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the agreement may be amended by a majority vote of the Commission only after approval of two-thirds vote of the Member Agencies. The Commission shall initiate any proposed amendment by requesting a formal recommendation from the Board of Chiefs, if applicable. The Commission shall then forward the proposed amendment with its recommendation to the governing body of each Party to the Agreement. The proposal shall be accompanied by a copy of the proposed amendment to the Agreement, which shall be adopted, properly executed, and returned to the Commission if the Party concurs with the amendment. The Secretary shall notify each Party of the resultant action; and
WHEREAS, the Parties wish for this Second Amendment to amend the terms of the Agreement regarding the subject matters contained herein, and for the new terms to be effective on the last signature date on the Second Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire for all terms of the Agreement to remain effective to the extent they are not amended by the First Amendment and this Second Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Santee, California, hereby:

RESOLUTION NO.

1. Approves the Second Amendment to the Santee-Lakeside Emergency Medical Services Authority Joint Powers Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit “A”; and

2. Authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular Meeting thereof held this 8th day of January 2025, by the following roll call vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:

JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
Attachment:

Exhibit A – Second Amendment to the Santee-Lakeside Emergency Medical Services Authority Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement

SECOND AMENDMENT TO

SANTEE-LAKESIDE

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AUTHORITY
JOINT EXERCISE of POWERS AGREEMENT

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT (“Second Amendment”) is made and entered into this __ day of _______ 2024, by and between the City of Santee (“Santee”), a California charter city and municipal corporation, and the Lakeside Fire Protection District (“LFPD”), organized and existing under the Fire Protection District Law of 1987, Health and Safety Code section 13800 et seq. (collectively, “Parties”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Parties are authorized to jointly exercise their powers pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, Chapter 4; Part 2, Division 2, Title 5, Sections 55631 through 55634, and Articles 1 through 4, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 (commencing with Section 6500), of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, on or about August 23, 2022, the Parties entered into the Santee-Lakeside Emergency Medical Services Authority Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (“Agreement”) pursuant to Articles 1 through 4, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 6500) relating to the joint exercise of power common to public agencies by the Parties to permit the joint exercise of certain powers both have in common; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Agreement is to (1) create the Santee-Lakeside Emergency Medical Services Joint Powers Authority; (2) to provide for the administration of the Authority; and (3) to jointly through the Authority exercise the common powers of the Parties by administering, funding, managing and overseeing coordination of advanced life support ambulance transport services by said Member Agencies. Such purpose is accomplished and common powers exercised in the manner set forth in the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agreement may be amended by a majority vote of the Commission only after approval of two-thirds vote of the Member Agencies. The Commission shall initiate any proposed amendment by requesting a formal recommendation from the Board of Chiefs, if applicable. The Commission shall then forward the proposed amendment with its recommendation to the governing body of each Party to the Agreement. The proposal shall be accompanied by a copy of the proposed amendment to the Agreement, which shall be adopted, properly executed, and returned to the Commission if the Party concurs with the amendment. The Secretary shall notify each Party of the resultant action; and WHEREAS, the Parties wish for this Second Amendment to amend the terms of the Agreement regarding the subject matters contained herein, and for the new terms to be effective on the last signature date set forth below (“Effective Date”); and WHEREAS, the Parties desire for all terms of the Agreement to remain effective to the extent they are not amended by the First Amendment and this Second Amendment.

Exhibit A
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, for and in consideration of the mutual benefits, promises, and agreements set forth herein, agree as follows:

AGREEMENT
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. Sub-Sections 9B, 9D and 9E of the Agreement are hereby revised to read as follows:

SECTION 9. Officers and Respective Duties.

B. Clerk of the Commission: The Clerk of the Commission shall be the Lakeside Fire Protection District’s Board Clerk, unless the Commission elects to appoint another individual at its sole discretion. The Clerk, in addition to keeping the minutes pursuant to the provisions of Sub-Section 8E of this Agreement, will prepare an agenda for each meeting of the Commission and the Board of Chiefs. The Clerk will solicit agenda items for regular meetings at least fifteen (15) working days in advance of said meeting and will distribute the agenda and supporting documentation in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act. The Clerk will meet jointly with the Chair of the Board of Chiefs and Chair of the Commission at least ten (10) working days in advance to develop the agenda. Agenda items will be supported by appropriate documentation and explanation. The Clerk will deliver the agenda and supporting documentation to each Commissioner, each Officer of the Authority, and each member of the Board at least five (5) working days prior to the scheduled meeting The Clerk will serve as the Authority’s FPPC Filing Officer and file the forms with the San Diego County Board of Supervisors.

In order to compensate for the services of the Clerk, the Authority shall pay the Lakeside Fire Protection District. The amount of the service fee and payment schedule shall be set forth in writing and approved by the Commission, the Lakeside Fire Protection District and the City of Santee following the Effective Date of the Second Amendment and may be revised as necessary in a writing signed by the Parties based on the Lakeside Fire Protection District’s projection of the cost to the perform said services. The scope of services provided by the Clerk shall be determined from time to time by the Commission in its sole discretion.

D. Clerk of the Board of Chiefs: The Clerk of the Board of Chiefs shall be the Clerk of the Commission. The Clerk will keep minutes and will prepare an agenda for each meeting of the Board of Chiefs.

E. Attorney of the Authority: The attorney of one of the Parties shall be appointed as the Attorney to the Authority at its first regular meeting, and shall serve at the pleasure of the Commission. Thereafter, at the first regular meeting held in every succeeding even calendar year commencing in 2026, it is the intent of the Parties that the Commission shall select the Attorney from the other Party to the Agreement to serve as the Attorney to the Authority. The Attorney shall advise the Commission, the Board of Chiefs, the Administrative Services Provider and/or officers of the Authority in connection with any business relating to the Authority. The Attorney or a designated deputy shall attend all meetings of the Commission; provided however, that the absence of the Attorney shall not affect the validity of any meeting. The Commission may, as determined necessary, employ other counsel to represent and/or advise the Commission, the Board of Chiefs, and/or officers of the Authority, on business and/or other litigation.

Notwithstanding the above, for calendar year 2025 only, the Commission may, in its sole discretion, remove the current Attorney and appoint counsel for the City of Santee as the Attorney to the Authority at a regular meeting by a vote of two (2) of the Commissioners.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to be executed and attested by their proper officers thereunto duly authorized, and their official seals to be hereto affixed as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF SANTEE LAKESIDE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
By: ______________________ By: ______________________
Marlene D. Best, City Manager Donald H. Butz, Fire Chief APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BEST & KRIEGER LLP MCDOUGAL LOVE BOEHMER FOLEY

LYON & MITCHELL
By: ________________________ By: __________________________ Shawn Haggerty, City Attorney Steve Boehmer, General Counsel Date: ___________________ Date: ___________________

RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE PROCLAIMING THE

TERMINATION OF THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATING TO

EXTREME FIRE RISK IN THE SAN DIEGO RIVER CORRIDOR AND THE COMPLETION

OF THE DEFENSIBLE SPACE MAINTENANCE TO MITIGATE FIRE RISK WHEREAS, California Government Code sections 8558(c) and 8630 authorize the proclamation of a local emergency when conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of a city exist; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 8630, such an emergency may be proclaimed by the governing body or by an official designated by ordinance adopted by the governing body; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.32.060 of the Santee Municipal Code empowers the City Manager to request that the City Council proclaim a local emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by an actual incident or the threatened existence of conditions or incidents of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the City caused by conditions which may be or are beyond control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City; and
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2024, the City Council proclaimed an emergency due to extreme fire risk in the San Diego River Corridor and authorized the maintenance of ten existing defensible space areas; and
WHEREAS, now the maintenance of such defensible space areas is 100% complete and the City Council has reviewed the need to continue the existence of a local emergency; and
WHEREAS, the situation resulting from conditions of extreme peril in the San Diego River Corridor is now deemed to be less extreme and within the ability of protective services, personnel, equipment, and facilities within the City of Santee to respond, such that the local emergency no longer exists.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Santee, California does hereby proclaim that the local emergency relating to extreme fire risk in the San Diego River Corridor, is hereby terminated.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular meeting thereof held this 8th day of January 2025, by the following roll call vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________

JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK

RESOLUTION NO. CDCSA

A RESOLUTION OF THE CDC SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTEE,

CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2025 TO JUNE 30, 2026 (“ROPS 25-26”) WHEREAS, pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), the City Council of the City of Santee (“City”) created the Community Development Commission of the City of Santee (“CDC”); and WHEREAS, the CDC was responsible for implementing the Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the Santee Community Redevelopment Project covering certain properties within the City (“Project Areas”); and
WHEREAS, as part of the 2011-12 State budget bill, the California State Legislature enacted, and the Governor signed, companion bills AB 1X26 and AB 1X27; and WHEREAS, on December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court upheld, in large part, AB 1x26 and overturned AB 1x27, thereby dissolving all redevelopment agencies in the state as of February 1, 2012; and
WHEREAS, on January 11, 2012 the City Council elected to become the successor agency to the CDC (“CDC Successor Agency”); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Health and Safety Code section 34177(o)(1), the ROPS for the period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 (“ROPS 25-26”) must be approved by the Successor Agency and the Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board and submitted to the State Department of Finance, State Controller and County AuditorController for review by February 1, 2025; and WHEREAS, on January 16, 2025 the Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board is scheduled to meet and approve ROPS 25-26.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the CDC Successor Agency of the City of Santee, California as follows:

Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Approval of ROPS. The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the period from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 (“ROPS 25-26’) is hereby approved, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

Section 3. Posting; Transmittal to Appropriate Agencies. The Director of Finance or her designee is hereby authorized and directed to provide the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule to the Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board for review and certification, to the State Department of Finance, the State Controller’s Office and the County Auditor-Controller, and post it on the City’s web site.

Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.

ADOPTED by the City of Santee City Council sitting as the CDC Successor Agency of the City of Santee, California at a Regular Meeting thereof held this 8th day of January 2025 by the following roll call vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED
JOHN W. MINTO, CHAIR
ATTEST

JAMES JEFFRIES, SECRETARY
Attachments: Exhibit “A”: Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the Period from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 (“ROPS 25-26”)
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Summary Filed for the July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 Period Successor Agency: Santee
County: San Diego
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
25-26A Total
(July -
December)
25-26B Total
(January -
June)
ROPS 25-26
Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ 10,069 $ - $ 10,069 B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds 10,069 - 10,069
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 1,665,397 $ 1,673,315 $ 3,338,712 F RPTTF 1,650,172 1,658,090 3,308,262
G Administrative RPTTF 15,225 15,225 30,450
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 1,675,466 $ 1,673,315 $ 3,348,781 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:

Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date

EXHIBIT A
Santee
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - ROPS Detail July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
25-26
Total
ROPS 25-26A (Jul - Dec)
25-26A
Total
ROPS 25-26B (Jan - Jun)
25-26B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds
RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
$39,124,871 $3,348,781 $- $- $10,069 $1,650,172 $15,225 $1,675,466 $- $- $- $1,658,090 $15,225 $1,673,315 4 Bond trustee
fees
Fees 01/25/
2005
08/01/2041 U.S.

Bank
Bond trustee
fees
Santee 22,400 N $1,400 - - - 1,400 - $1,400 - - - - - $- 5 Arbitrage
rebate
analysis
Fees 05/11/
2005
08/01/2041 BLX
Group
Inc.

Arbitrage
rebate
calculations
Santee 23,300 N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
6 Continuing
disclosure
reporting
Fees 01/18/
2012
08/01/2041 KNN
Public
Finance
Continuing
disclosure
reporting
Santee 12,000 N $750 - - - - - $- - - - 750 - $750
10 Successor
agency
administration
Admin
Costs
07/01/
2025
06/30/2026 City of
Santee
Administrative
cost
reimbursement
Santee 30,450 N $30,450 - - - - 15,225 $15,225 - - - - 15,225 $15,225 18 Tax Allocation
Refunding
Bonds 2016
Series A
Refunding
Bonds
Issued
After 6/
27/12
11/08/
2016
08/01/2041 U.S.

Bank
(trustee)
Provides for
the current
refunding of all
outstanding
Tax Allocation
Bonds 2005
Series A and
for the
advance
refunding of all
outstanding
Tax Allocation
Bonds 2011
Series A
Santee 39,036,721 N $3,316,181 - - 10,069 1,648,772 - $1,658,841 - - - 1,657,340 - $1,657,340 Santee
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Report of Cash Balances July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.

A B C D E F G H
ROPS 22-23 Cash Balances
(07/01/22 - 06/30/23)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12/31/10
Bonds issued
on or after
01/01/11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.

Non-Admin
and Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual 07/01/22)
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution
amount.
847,514 9,378 6,629 Column E: Beginning available cash balance of $7,905 plus ROPS 21-22 PPA of $1,473
2 Revenue/Income (Actual 06/30/23)
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 22-23 total
distribution from the County Auditor-Controller
24 10,069 3,340,048 Column G: $1,668,412 from ROPS 22-23A plus $1,671,636 from ROPS 22-23B
3 Expenditures for ROPS 22-23 Enforceable Obligations
(Actual 06/30/23)
(39,978) 2,327 2,707 3,339,700 Column D: $22 cash on hand with trustee plus $40,000 increase in the required
advance principal payment to the bond
trustee from the prior year; Column E: ROPS
19-20 PPA expended in ROPS 22-23;
Column F: $1,882 expended in ROPS 23-24
+ $825 expended in ROPS 24-25; Column G:
$3,339,700 RPTTF
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/23) RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts
distributed as reserve for future period(s)
887,516 7,051 3,922 Column D: Funds required to be held by bond trustee for the 8/1/23 debt service payment;
Column E: $5,578 ROPS20-21 PPA
expended in ROPS 23-24 plus $1,473 ROPS
21-22 PPA expended in ROPS 24-25
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.

Non-Admin
and Admin
5 ROPS 22-23 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 22-23 PPA
form submitted to the CAC
No entry required 348
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/23)
C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)
$- $- $- $10,069 $- Column F: Funds to be applied to ROPS 25-26
Santee
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Notes July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026
Item # Notes/Comments
4 5 Arbitrage rebate analysis is performed every 5 years 6 10
18 60139.00162\43019067.1
RESOLUTION NO. __________

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTEE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE NEXUS IMPACT

FEE STUDY, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FOR ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY, AND

TAKING OTHER ACTIONS RELATED THERETO
WHEREAS, the City of Santee (the “City”), California is duly authorized pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (the “Act”), commencing with California Government Code, section 66000 et seq., to impose development impact fees (“Fees”) for purposes defraying all or a portion of the costs of public facilities related to new development occurring within the City; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with requirements of the Act, the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) has directed staff to conduct a comprehensive review of the City's Fees to determine whether those fees are adequate to defray the cost of capital facilities, infrastructure, vehicles, and equipment to mitigate the demands placed upon the City caused by new development; and
WHEREAS, the City retained an independent consultant to conduct and prepare an impact fee nexus study, the Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study dated December 2024, (the “Study”), attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Study and related documents for the proposed Fees have been made available for public review and comment as required by the Act; and WHEREAS, the City provided notice of the public hearing and provided written notice to any interested parties that have requested such notice pursuant to the notice requirements of the Act; and
WHEREAS, in compliance with the Act, the City Council opened a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Study and Fees on November 13, 2024, and continued said public hearing to January 8, 2025 to allow time for further discussion and consideration of the Study and Fees, and at the continued public hearing all oral and written presentations from the public regarding the proposed Study and Fees were heard and considered; and
WHEREAS, the City Council will concurrently adopt this Resolution with Ordinance No. ___, an ordinance amending the City of Santee Municipal Code (the “Code”), Title 12, Chapter 12.30 to reflect minor changes to the newly adopted Fees, Fee categories, and certain methodology changes; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred and the City Council now desires to adopt the proposed Study and Fees, in accordance with the nexus calculations and recommendations in the Study.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, as follows:

ATTACHMENT 1
60139.00162\43019067.1
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council finds and determines that the Study and the Fees, comply with the Act by establishing the basis for the imposition of Fees on new development. This finding is based on the fact that the Study:
(a) Identifies the purpose of the Fees;
(b) Identifies the use to which the Fees will be put;
(c) Shows a reasonable relationship between the use of the Fees and the type of development project on which the Fees are imposed; (d) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the type of development projects on which the Fees are imposed; and
(e) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Fees and the cost of the public facilities or portion of the public facilities attributable to the development on which the Fees are imposed.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby determines that the Fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance the public facilities and equipment described or identified in the Study or other such facility plans as may be proposed, modified, or amended from time to time by the City Council.

SECTION 4. The City Council has considered the specific project descriptions and cost estimates identified in the Study and hereby approves such project descriptions and cost estimates and finds them reasonable as the basis for calculating and imposing the Fees.

SECTION 5. The City Council finds that the Fees recommended in the Study are separate and different from other fees the City may impose through the implementation of a specific plan or as a condition of final map approval, building permit issuance or tentative or parcel map approval pursuant to its authority under the Subdivision Map Act, the Quimby Act, and the City's implementing resolutions and ordinances, as may be amended from time to time.

In addition, this Resolution shall not be deemed to affect the imposition or collection of other fees the City is legally authorized to impose and collect.

SECTION 6. The Study is hereby adopted.

SECTION 7. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Fees as set forth in Exhibit “A” to this Resolution, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Exhibit “A” sets forth the aggregate amount imposed as Fees for development projects and also sets forth the breakdown of the Fees by category type. The Fees set forth in Exhibit “A” are consistent with the Study. The amount of the Fees shall be automatically adjusted annually to account for inflation each July 1 beginning July 1, 2025.

The inflation adjustment is the greater of two percent (2%) or the increase in the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the 20-City Average as reported by the Engineering News Record for a twelve-month period, or a similar published index if the CCI is no longer available. Such inflationary increases shall not constitute an increase within the 60139.00162\43019067.1
meaning of the Act and may be implemented each year without the requirement to obtain approval of the City Council.

SECTION 8. The Fees approved by this Resolution supersede previously adopted resolutions that set the amounts of Fees.

SECTION 9. If any action, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution or the imposition of the Fees for any project described in the Study or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution or other Fees levied by this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provisions or application of the Fees.

SECTION 10. The City Council finds that this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because this Resolution does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA and because this Resolution will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (State CEQA Guidelines section 15060, subd. (c)(2), (3).) Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines defines a project as the whole of an action, which could potentially result in either a direct physical change, or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change, in the environment.

Here, this Resolution will not result in any construction or development, and it will not have any other effect that would physically change the environment. This Resolution therefore does not qualify as a project subject to CEQA.

SECTION 11. Consistent with the Act, the Fees as identified in attached Exhibit "A" adopted by this Resolution shall take effect on March 10, 2025, a period at least sixty (60) days following the adoption of this Resolution by the City Council.

SECTION 12. The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which the City Council’s findings and determinations are based are located at 10601 Magnolia Ave, Santee, CA 92071. The City Clerk is the custodian of the record of proceedings.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santee, California, at a Regular meeting thereof held this 8th day of January, 2025, by the following roll call vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

JOHN W. MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST:

JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
60139.00162\43019067.1
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”
2025 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
60139.00162\43019067.1
B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Final Comprehensive Development
Impact Fee Nexus Study
City of Santee
December 2024
Prepared For: Prepared By:
101 Progress #250
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 655-3900

EXHIBIT B
This page intentionally left blank.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study i December 2024 City of Santee
Table of Contents
Section 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Program Administration Fee ..................................................................................... 5 Fee Adjustment Procedures ..................................................................................... 6 Timing of Fee Payment ............................................................................................ 7 Section 2 Legal Context and Methodology ........................................................................... 8 Nexus Requirement Summary ................................................................................. 8 AB602 ...................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 10 Section 3 Population and Land Use Assumptions ............................................................ 11 Land Use Types ..................................................................................................... 11 Growth Forecasts ................................................................................................... 11 Average Unit Sizes ................................................................................................. 14 Section 4 Public Facilities Fee ............................................................................................. 15 Background ............................................................................................................ 15 Service Population ................................................................................................. 15 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 15 Planned Level of Service........................................................................................ 17 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 18 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 20 Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections ....................................... 20 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 22 Section 5 Traffic Signal Fee ................................................................................................. 24 Background ............................................................................................................ 24 Trips ..................................................................................................................... 26 Service Population ................................................................................................. 29 Cost Summary ....................................................................................................... 29 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 29 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 31 Reduced Traffic Fee ............................................................................................... 31 Revenue Projections .............................................................................................. 32 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 33 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 33 Section 6 Traffic Mitigation Fee ........................................................................................... 35 Background ............................................................................................................ 35 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study ii December 2024 City of Santee
Service Population ................................................................................................. 36 Cost Summary ....................................................................................................... 36 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 37 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 39 Reduced Traffic Fee ............................................................................................... 39 Revenue Projections .............................................................................................. 40 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 41 Section 7 Drainage Fee ......................................................................................................... 43 Background ............................................................................................................ 43 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 43 Planned Level of Service........................................................................................ 45 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 45 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 46 Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections ....................................... 46 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 47 Section 8 Parks-in-Lieu Fee ................................................................................................. 50 Background ............................................................................................................ 50 Parkland ................................................................................................................. 50 Service Population ................................................................................................. 51 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 51 Planned Level of Service........................................................................................ 52 Fee Credits ............................................................................................................. 53 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 54 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 54 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 55 Section 9 Fire Facilities Fee ................................................................................................. 57 Background ............................................................................................................ 57 Service Population ................................................................................................. 57 Cost Summary ....................................................................................................... 57 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 60 Fee Summary ......................................................................................................... 61 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 62 Capital Improvements and Revenue Projections ................................................... 63 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 64 Section 10 Long Range Planning Fee ................................................................................... 67 Background ............................................................................................................ 67 Current Level of Service ......................................................................................... 67 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study iii December 2024 City of Santee
Planned Level of Service........................................................................................ 68 Fee Methodology.................................................................................................... 69 Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections ....................................... 69 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 70 Section 11 Program Administration Fee ............................................................................... 72 Background ............................................................................................................ 72 Nexus Requirement Summary ............................................................................... 74 Section 12 Implementation and Administration ................................................................... 76 Implementation ....................................................................................................... 76 Fee Program Administrative Requirements ........................................................... 76 Fee Adjustment Procedures ................................................................................... 78 Timing of Fee Payment .......................................................................................... 78 Credits and Reimbursement Policies ..................................................................... 78 Administrative Fee.................................................................................................. 78 Programming Revenues with the CIP .................................................................... 79 Fee Reporting ........................................................................................................ 79 Accessory Dwelling Units ....................................................................................... 79 Specialized Development Projects ......................................................................... 80 Rebuild or Expansion Projects ............................................................................... 80 Appendix A Capital Improvement Program………………………………………………………..81 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study iv December 2024 City of Santee
Tables
Table 1-1: Summary of Proposed Development Impact Fees ...................................................... 3 Table 1-2: Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (Residential) ...................................................................................................................... 4 Table 1-3: Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (NonResidential) ...................................................................................................................... 5 Table 3-1: Existing and Future Land Uses .................................................................................. 12 Table 3-2: Existing Service Population ....................................................................................... 12 Table 3-3: Estimated Service Population at Buildout .................................................................. 13 Table 3-4: Persons per Household & Employment Density ........................................................ 13 Table 3-5: Residential Land Use Average Unit Size ................................................................... 14 Table 4-1: Existing Public Facilities ............................................................................................ 16 Table 4-2: Existing Level of Service per Resident ...................................................................... 17 Table 4-3: Existing Level of Service for Parkland ....................................................................... 18 Table 4-4: Population Allocation for Recreation Facilities ........................................................... 19 Table 4-5: Planned New Public Facilities .................................................................................... 19 Table 4-6: Park Facilities Construction Costs per Resident ........................................................ 20 Table 4-7: Public Facility Cost per Resident ............................................................................... 20 Table 4-8: Public Facilities Fee Cost Summary .......................................................................... 20 Table 4-9: Public Facilities Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout ................................................ 21 Table 5-1: Traffic Signal Facilities – Planned Facilities ............................................................... 24 Table 5-2: Existing Traffic Signal Facilities (page 1 of 2) ............................................................ 25 Table 5-3: Trip Rates per Land Use ............................................................................................ 27 Table 5-4: Existing Vehicle Trips ................................................................................................ 27 Table 5-5: New Vehicle Trips ...................................................................................................... 28 Table 5-6: Total Vehicle Trips ..................................................................................................... 28 Table 5-7: Traffic Signal Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip ............................................................ 30 Table 5-8: Traffic Signal Existing Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip ............................................... 31 Table 5-9: Traffic Signal Fee Summary ...................................................................................... 31 Table 5-10: Anticipated Traffic Signal Fee Collection at Buildout ............................................... 32 Table 5-11: Existing Level of Service per Vehicle Trip ............................................................... 33 Table 6-1: Traffic Mitigation Facilities – Planned Facilities ......................................................... 35 Table 6-2: Future Additional Trips ............................................................................................... 36 Table 6-3: Existing Trips ............................................................................................................. 38 Table 6-4: Traffic Mitigation Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip ....................................................... 39 Table 6-5: Traffic Mitigation Fee Summary ................................................................................. 39 Table 6-6: Anticipated Traffic Mitigation Fee Collection at Buildout ............................................ 41 Table 7-1: Existing Drainage Facilities ........................................................................................ 44 Table 7-2: Drainage Facilities Cost per Impervious Acre ............................................................ 45 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study v December 2024 City of Santee
Table 7-3: Drainage Fee Summary ............................................................................................. 46 Table 7-4: Anticipated Future Drainage Projects ........................................................................ 47 Table 7-5: Drainage Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout ........................................................... 47 Table 8-1: Parkland Inventory List .............................................................................................. 51 Table 8-2: Existing Level of Service per Resident ...................................................................... 52 Table 8-3: Parkland Cost per Resident ....................................................................................... 54 Table 8-4: Parks-in-Lieu Fee Cost Summary .............................................................................. 55 Table 9-1: Fire Facilities Inventory List ....................................................................................... 58 Table 9-2: Fire Facilities Planned Facilities ................................................................................ 59 Table 9-3: Fire Facilities Level of Service per Capita ................................................................. 61 Table 9-4: Fire Facilities Fee Summary ...................................................................................... 62 Table 9-5: Fire Facilities Existing Level of Service ..................................................................... 63 Table 9-6: Costs of Future Fire Facilities .................................................................................... 64 Table 9-7: Anticipated Fire Facilities Estimated Revenue at Buildout......................................... 64 Table 10-1: Long Range Planning Elements Cost ...................................................................... 67 Table 10-2: Long Range Planning Cost per Resident/Worker .................................................... 68 Table 10-3: Long Range Planning Fee Summary ....................................................................... 69 Table 10-4: Anticipated Long Range Planning Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout .................. 70 Table 11-1: Program Administration Fee .................................................................................... 73 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 1 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 1 Executive Summary
Introduction
The City of Santee (City) is a suburban city located in San Diego County (County). Located in the eastern part of the San Diego metropolitan area, Santee is bordered by El Cajon on the south and southeast, the City of San Diego on the west and northwest, and the County of San Diego on east and northeast. The City is located just 18 miles from the Pacific Ocean and is bisected by the San Diego river, a large greenbelt that includes parks, trails, and over 1,100 acres of natural riparian habitat. Santee is connected to the coastline by State Route 52, a six-lane freeway that connects Interstate 5 in La Jolla to State Route 67. State Route 125 also intersects with State Route 52, forming a transportation hub in the heart of the City.

The City was incorporated in 1980 after beginning as a community of ranches originally named Cowleston after founder George A. Cowles. The City was renamed Santee in 1893 after Milton Santee, a local civil engineer and real estate developer. The City features extensive hiking and mountain biking trails, and the 700-acre Town Center district forms a downtown core comprised of business parks, high-density residential and retail businesses. The Town Center Community Park, located along the San Diego River, features a 15-acre sports field complex and an aquatics center.

As of January 1, 2023, the California Department of Finance (DOF) estimates that the City population is 59,227. As the resident population and non-resident employment in the City increase, there exists a correlating rise in the demand for public infrastructure and services to support growth within the City. California’s Assembly Bill 1600 (AB1600) adopted in 1987 and codified as California Government Code Section 66000 et. seq., allows the City to impose Development Impact Fees on new development within the City. Development Impact Fees (DIFs) are a one-time charge on new development that is collected and used by the City to cover the cost of capital facilities, vehicles, and equipment that are required to serve new growth.

The City of Santee General Plan 2020 (General Plan) was adopted on August 23, 2003, and is comprised of the following nine elements: Land Use; Housing; Mobility; Recreation; Trails; Conservation; Noise; Safety; and Community Enhancement. The City’s Housing Element was adopted in May 2022 in conformance with the 2021-2029 update cycle for jurisdictions in the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) region and was reviewed with the rest of the General Plan to ensure internal consistency. The City’s General Plan and updated Housing Element form the basis of the City’s current development impact fee program along with land use projections and service population derived from the City Planning Department’s land use analysis.

As stated in the Housing Element, most of the City's residentially zoned land has already been developed with a diversity of housing types, including single-family homes, mobile home parks, Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 2 December 2024 City of Santee
townhomes, condominiums and apartments. However, several hundred acres within the Specific Plan District and the Town Center District remain undeveloped and available for future housing development.

The Nexus Study is based on the General Plan Buildout, based on the land use projects derived from the Housing Element and City Planning Department’s land use analysis. As stated in the Land Use chapter of the General Plan, the City's future is tied to the type and amount of new development it can accommodate at General Plan Buildout. Projecting future buildout capacity requires consideration of several variables and is based on assumed densities (dwelling units per acre) and intensity factors that include allowed lot coverage and floor-to-area ratios (FAR), parking requirements, etc. While some of today's developed lands may change in the coming years, most of the assumed City buildout is on remaining vacant lands planned for residential and employmentgenerating uses.

The City’s Housing Element was adopted May 11, 2022. The Housing Element was updated in conformance with the 2021-2029 update cycle for jurisdictions in the SANDAG region and has been reviewed with the rest of the General Plan to ensure internal consistency. As portions of the General Plan are amended in the future, the Plan (including the Housing Element) will be reviewed to ensure that internal consistency is maintained.

The goal of the City is to develop a fee program that achieves the objectives laid out in the General Plan and associated Master Plans, balances fee levels with desired economic growth, and complies with the legal requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (AB1600/Government Code Section 66000 et seq.), Assembly Bill 602 (AB602), and the standards established by Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v City of Tigard (1994) which require that impact fees have an “essential nexus” to each development project they are charged on and must be charged in “rough proportionality” to the impact caused by the new development.

Nexus Study
Purpose
As development occurs in the City, new backbone infrastructure and capital facilities are required to mitigate the increased demand created by new residents and workers. Revenues from DIFs fund the construction of new backbone infrastructure and capital facilities as well as the related administrative costs through the City’s fee program. The fee program contains separate fee categories for each type of infrastructure and capital facilities. Incorporated in this Nexus Study (Nexus Study, Study or Report) are the following fees:
• Public Facilities
• Traffic Signal
• Traffic Mitigation
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 3 December 2024 City of Santee
• Drainage
• Parks-in-Lieu
• Fire Facilities
• Long Range Planning
• Program Administration
This Report is designed to satisfy the AB1600 Nexus requirements, AB602 requirements, and provide the necessary technical analysis to support the adoption of the updated fees. The fees will be effective 60 days after the City’s final action establishing and authorizing the collection of the fees.

Results
Updated Fees
Pursuant to AB602 guidance, residential development fees are proposed to be assessed on a per square foot basis. To yield consistency across fees assessed on non-residential land uses, nonresidential development fees will be assessed per 1,000 building square foot. The Public Facilities Fee, which funds park and recreation facilities and the Park-in-Lieu, which funds park land acquisition will continue to not be assessed on non-residential development based on the assumption that non-residential development does not generate demand for park facilities. Fees on Accessory Dwelling Units, specialized projects, and rebuild projects are detailed further in Section 12: Implementation and Administration. Table 1-1 shows a summary of the proposed fees.

Table 1-1: Summary of Proposed Development Impact Fees
Proposed Fees Comparison with Existing Fees
Table 1-2 compares the Proposed Fees against the Existing Fees for Residential Land Uses.

Existing residential fees were converted from a fee per dwelling unit to per square foot. Fees for Fire Facilities, General Plan, and Program Administration are new proposed fees so there are no existing fees to compare to.

Land Use
Public
Facilities Traffic Signal
Traffic
Mitigation Drainage Park in-Lieu Fire Facilities
Long Range
Planning Administration (1) Total
Residential
Single Family 5.21 $ 0.37 $ 2.68 $ 0.35 $ 6.66 $ 1.75 $ 0.08 $ 0.34 $ $ 17.44 Multi-Family 5.79 $ 0.29 $ 2.07 $ 0.43 $ 7.41 $ 1.95 $ 0.09 $ 0.36 $ $ 18.39 Non-Residential
Commercial Exempt 1,884.95 $ 13,462.20 $ 1,689.92 $ Exempt 887.29 $ 39.84 $ 359.28 $ $ 18,323.48 Office Exempt 1,040.14 $ 7,428.64 $ 631.53 $ Exempt 1,950.08 $ 87.56 $ 222.76 $ $ 11,360.71 Industrial Exempt 240.67 $ 1,718.83 $ 1,295.13 $ Exempt 195.01 $ 8.76 $ 69.17 $ $ 3,527.57 Notes:
1 An administrative fee (2% of each fee) is collected for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) development impact fee program administration costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analysis. (Fee per Square Foot)
(Fee per 1,000 Building Square Foot)
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 4 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 1-2: Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (Residential)
Table 1-3 compares the Proposed Fees against the Existing Fees for Non-Residential Land Uses.

Office and Commercial land uses experience a large increase (126% and 39% respectively), mainly due to the Traffic Signal and Traffic Mitigation fees. The existing fees collected on these two land uses were abnormally low. Furthermore, the assumptions for non-residential development have changed significantly since the prior fee update, which greatly impacted the analysis.

Single Family Existing Fee (1) Proposed Fee Percentage Change Public Facilities 3.81 $ 5.21 $ 37%
Traffic Signal 0.22 $ 0.37 $ 68%
Traffic Mitigation 2.15 $ 2.68 $ 25%
Drainage (2) $ 0.35 2.07 $ -83%
Park in-lieu 4.59 $ 6.66 $ 45%
Fire Facilities - $ 1.75 $ N/A
General Plan - $ 0.08 $ N/A
Administration - $ 0.34 $ N/A
TOTAL 12.84 $ 17.44 $ 36%
Multi Family Existing Fee (1) Proposed Fee Percentage Change Public Facilities 4.73 $ 5.79 $ 22%
Traffic Signal 0.19 $ 0.29 $ 52%
Traffic Mitigation 1.84 $ 2.07 $ 12%
Drainage 1.60 $ 0.43 $ -73%
Park in-lieu 5.76 $ 7.41 $ 29%
Fire Facilities - $ 1.95 $ N/A
General Plan - $ 0.09 $ N/A
Administration - $ 0.36 $ N/A
TOTAL 14.12 $ 18.39 $ 30%
Notes:
1 2
Ex isting fees w ere conv erted from a fee per dw elling unit to per square foot using the same residential size assumptions in this study to prov ide a more accurate comparison to the new fee structure.

Drainage Fee for ex isting Single Family takes the av erage of Land Uses: HL, R1, R1A, and R2.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 5 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 1-3: Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (Non-Residential)
Program Administration Fee
The City oversees the implementation and administration of the DIF Program, consistent with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act. A two percent (2%) Program Administration Fee of the Commercial Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal 1,627.00 $ 1,884.95 $ 16%
Traffic Mitigation 10,090.00 $ 13,462.20 $ 33%
Drainage 1,507.00 $ 1,689.92 $ 12%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities - $ 887.29 $ N/A
General Plan - $ 39.84 $ N/A
Administration - $ 359.28 $ N/A
TOTAL 13,224.00 $ 18,323.48 $ 39%
Office Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal 487.00 $ 1,040.14 $ 114%
Traffic Mitigation 3,023.00 $ 7,428.64 $ 146%
Drainage 1,507.00 $ 631.53 $ -58%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities - $ 1,950.08 $ N/A
General Plan - $ 87.56 $ N/A
Administration - $ 222.76 $ N/A
TOTAL 5,017.00 $ 11,360.71 $ 126%
Industrial Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal 204.00 $ 240.67 $ 18%
Traffic Mitigation 1,262.00 $ 1,718.83 $ 36%
Drainage 1,507.00 $ 1,295.13 $ -14%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities - $ 195.01 $ N/A
General Plan - $ 8.76 $ N/A
Administration - $ 69.17 $ N/A
TOTAL 2,973.00 $ 3,527.57 $ 19%
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 6 December 2024 City of Santee
overall Program costs is added to fund the costs of the City’s management and ongoing fee program administration, collection, and reporting. This includes costs associated with City staff and consultant time, studies, and administration to support the program. Industry standard ranges from three to six percent (3-6%) of the fee for the administrative component of a development fee program. The administrative functions include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Annual fee adjustments
• Annual fee reporting
• Additional fee reporting every five years
• Posting of nexus studies and fee schedules on the City’s website • Nexus study updates every eight years (an AB602 requirement) • Master Plans necessary to support the Nexus study updates • Staff and consultant time related to fee preparation, collection, tracking, and administration
• Staff and consultant time needed to track credits and reimbursements for improvements constructed in the fee program
In addition to the aforementioned administrative activities, the City is responsible for both (i) using fee revenues to plan for and construct required capital facilities and (ii) pursue other funding sources, as required, to bridge financial gaps between what is collected and the actual cost to construct needed facilities. Furthermore, given the additional fee reporting requirements of AB516, posting of information per AB1483, Nexus Study updates every eight years per AB602, and additional staff time to administer this fee program and the potential for a Master Plan in the future to support a Nexus Study update, a two percent (2%) Program Administration Fee is necessary to fund these additional requirements.

Fee Adjustment Procedures
The DIFs may be adjusted periodically to reflect revised facility requirements, receipt of funding from alternative sources (i.e., State or Federal grants), revised facilities or costs, changes in demographics, changes in the average unit square footage, or changes in the land use plan. In accordance with Santee Municipal Code section 12.30.050, Santee Development Impact Fees are automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year. The inflation adjustment is two percent or based on the previous calendar years increase in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (CPI-U:

All Items) as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, whichever is higher. The City will amend the current municipal code to reflect adjusting the fees annually on July 1st of each year using the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the 20-City Average, as reported by Engineering News Record (ENR), for a twelve-month period or a similar published index if the CCI Index is no longer available.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 7 December 2024 City of Santee
Timing of Fee Payment
Fees will be collected at the time the building permit for the project is issued. All residential projects will pay a fee based on the livable square footage of the residential unit(s). For highdensity residential projects (defined in the General Plan as high-density residential development with multi-family dwellings, including apartments and condominiums), the fees will be due at the time of the building permit for each building. For high-density residential projects with communal space, the non-residential communal portion (i.e., clubhouse, maintenance facility, gym, etc.) will not be assessed impact fees as the impact is assumed to be captured in the residential fees. Areas that are accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be charged impact fees according to use.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 8 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 2 Legal Context and Methodology
Nexus Requirement Summary
AB1600 was enacted by the State of California in 1987 creating the Mitigation Fee Act - Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code. The Mitigation Fee Act requires that all public agencies satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project:

1. Identify the purpose of the fee.

2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified.

3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

5. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

The purpose of this report is to demonstrate that all fee components comply with the Mitigation Fee Act. The assumptions, methodologies, facility standards, costs, and cost allocation factors that were used to establish the nexus between the fees and the development on which the fees will be charged are summarized in subsequent sections of this Report.

AB602
AB602, which was enacted by the State of California in 2021, amended Sections 65940.1 and 66019 of, and added Section 66016.5 to the Government Code. AB602 requires that if a local agency conducts and adopts an impact fee nexus study after January 1, 2022, the local agency shall follow all of the following standards and practices:

1. Before the adoption of an associated development fee, an impact fee nexus study shall be adopted.

2. When applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.

3. A nexus study shall include information that supports the local agency’s actions, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 66001 of the Government Code.

4. If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, the local agency shall review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fees collected under the original fee.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 9 December 2024 City of Santee

5. A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development. A local agency that imposes a fee proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units of the development shall be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. A nexus study is not required to comply with the requirements to calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionally to the square footage of the proposed units if the local agency makes the following findings:
• An explanation as to why square footage is not appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on housing development project.
• An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. • That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments, or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.

6. Large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study.

7. All studies shall be adopted at a public hearing with at least 30 days’ notice, and the local agency shall notify any member of the public that requests notice of intent to begin an impact fee nexus study of the date of the hearing.

8. Studies shall be updated at least every eight years, from the period beginning on January 1, 2022.

9. The local agency may use the impact fee nexus study template developed by the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to Section 50466.5 of the Health and Safety Code.

This report demonstrates that all fee components comply with AB602. An analysis of level of service for each applicable fee component is summarized in subsequent sections of this report. The methodologies performed to calculate the updated fees ensure that the costs for facilities are proportionately spread between existing and future users. Any existing deficiencies were removed and are not charged to new development.

Capital Improvement Plan
AB602 states that large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan (CIP) as part of the nexus study. This report includes the facilities to be adopted as the City’s CIP for the DIF program in Appendix A.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 10 December 2024 City of Santee
Methodology
Imposed fees require various findings to ensure that a reasonable relationship exists between the fee amount and the cost of the facility or portion of the facility attributable to the new development.

Several methodologies are available to determine fee amounts. The most common methodologies are defined by the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley.

Choosing the appropriate methodology depends on the type of facility for which the fee is calculated and the availability of documentation to support the fee calculation. Following is a discussion of the methodologies available to calculate the separate fee components in this report.

Existing Inventory Method
The existing inventory method, also known as the “incremental method” uses a facility standard based on the ratio of existing facilities to the demand on the facilities by the existing service population on a cost per unit or cost per square foot basis. Under this approach, new development funds the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development. By definition, the existing inventory method ensures that no facility deficiencies are spread to future development. This method is often used when a long range plan for new facilities is not available.

Planned Facilities Method
The planned facilities method calculates the proposed fee based on the ratio of planned facilities to the increase in demand associated with new development. This method is appropriate when planned facilities have been defined by a long range master plan or expenditure plan which includes specific facilities and cost estimates. As the Planned Facilities Method relies on a long range master plan that may change as the plan is implemented, fees based on this methodology need to be regularly updated to remain consistent with the project lists and current plans.

System Plan Method
The system plan method utilizes an integrated approach to allocate the cost of existing facilities and the costs of planned facilities to the total development in the study area. This method is appropriate when calculating a systemwide fee in which new development will fund an integrated system of facilities at the future standard attributable to new development. By spreading the costs of an integrated system incorporating the existing facilities and planned facilities costs to the total development in the study area, this ensures that new development only pays their proportional share of the total system costs and is not responsible for rectifying any existing deficiencies.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 11 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 3 Population and Land Use Assumptions
Land Use Types
To ensure a reasonable relationship between each fee and the type of development paying the fee, different land use types must be distinguished. The land use categories used in this analysis are defined below.
• Single Family Residential (SFR): Detached single-family dwelling units. Includes very low density, low density, and age-restricted units. • Multi-Family Residential (MFR): Attached residential projects. • Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU): A second unit, attached or detached from a SFR. • Commercial: All commercial, retail, educational, hotel/motel development, and mixed-use development.
• Office: All general, professional, and medical office development. • Industrial: All manufacturing and warehouse development.

Some developments may include more than one land use type, such as an industrial warehouse with living quarters (a live-work designation) or a planned unit development with both single and multi-family uses. In these cases, the fees will be calculated separately for each land use type.

Growth Forecasts
Growth projections are used as indicators of demand and projected revenue to fund the infrastructure identified in Appendix A. The City’s existing population and Buildout population projections are critical assumptions used throughout the fee sections that follow in this report. The following resources were used as part of this analysis:
• Estimates of total development through Buildout were based on the City’s land use plan from the City’s Housing Element Cycle 2021-2029 and the City’s Planning Department’s land use analysis.
• Population projections were based on the land use projections and the estimated persons per household taken from the US Census American Community Survey. • Existing population estimates are based on the existing land uses and persons per household taken from the US Census American Community Survey. Existing nonresidential worker populations are based on non-residential land use data from the City’s Planning Department and the corresponding employment densities. • Worker projections are based on estimated buildout square footage and the employees per square feet assumption from the USGBC LEED BD+C: New Construction | v4 – Default Occupancy Counts.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 12 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 3-1 identifies the existing and future residential units and non-residential square feet. The land use information is based on the City’s General Plan, City of Santee Housing Element Cycle 2021-2029, and City planning staff. The Office land use is treated as commercial use in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. For purpose of this analysis, 7.6% of Commercial / Office Land growth use is assumed as office space based on current GIS land use office and commercial acres.

Table 3-1: Existing and Future Land Uses
Table 3-2 identifies the existing service population. Non-residential buildings are typically occupied less than dwelling units, so it is reasonable to assume that average per-worker demand for services is less than average per-resident demand. The 0.37-weighting factor for workers is based upon a 45-hour work week (40 hours of work plus 1 hour lunch break) relative to a resident’s non-working time of 123 hours (168 hours per week less 45 work hours).

Table 3-2: Existing Service Population
Land Use Existing Projected Growth (1) Total (Buildout) Residential (Units)
Single Family 1,444 13,801 15,245
Multi Family 4,466 7,447 11,913
Subtotal Residential 21,248 5,910 27,158
Non-Residential (SF) (1)
Commercial 1,020,343 2,309,312 3,329,654
Office 83,924 189,943 273,868
Industrial 1,266,299 2,683,296 3,949,595
Subtotal Non-Residential 5,182,551 2,370,566 7,553,117
Notes
1 Office land use is treated as commercial use in General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. For purpose of this analy sis,

7.6% of Commercial/Office Land grow th use is assumed as office space based on current GIS land use office and commercial acres.

Category Total Persons
Weighting
Factor (3)
Service
Population
Residents (1) 58,086 1.00 58,086
Workers (2) 21,968 0.37 8,128
Total 80,054 66,214
Notes:
1 2
densities (Commercial: 1.82, Office: 4.0, Industrial: 0.4). 3 Based on the ex isting number of units and persons per household assumptions.

Employ ment data based on ex isting non-residential land use and the corresponding employ ment Workers are w eighted at 0.37 based on a 45 hour w ork w eek relativ e to a resident's time of 123 hours (168 hours per w eek less 45 w ork hours).

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 13 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 3-3 shows the estimated service population at Buildout.

Table 3-3: Estimated Service Population at Buildout

Occupant Density
Occupant densities ensure a reasonable relationship between the increase in service population and the amount of the fee. Developers pay the fee based on the square footage of additional housing units or building square feet of non-residential development, so the fee schedule must convert service population estimates to these measurements of project size. This conversion is done using the average occupant density factors by land use type shown in Table 3-4. The residential density factors were derived from the US Census American Community Survey while the non-residential densities were derived from the U.S. Green Building Council Default Occupancy Counts.

Table 3-4: Persons per Household & Employment Density
Category
Total
Existing
Persons
Total Futue
Growth
Total
Persons
Weighting
Factor (3)
Service
Population
Residents (1) 58,086 14,815 72,901 1.00 72,901
Workers (2) 21,968 2,700 24,668 0.37 9,127
Total 80,054 17,515 97,569 82,028
Notes:
1 2
3 Workers are w eighted at 0.37 based on a 45 hour w ork w eek relativ e to a resident's time of 123 hours (168 hours per w eek less 45 w ork hours).

Based on projected grow th in 1,000 SF of non-residential land use and the corresponding employ ment densities (Commercial: 1.82, Office: 4.0, Industrial: 0.4).

Based on projected grow th in units and the resident per unit assumption (2.93 per single family and 2.37 for multi-family ).

Land Use
Residential (1)
Single Family 2.93 Residents per dwelling unit
Multi-Family 2.37 Residents per dwelling unit
Non-Residential (2)
Commercial 1.82 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Office 4.00 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Industrial 0.40 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Notes:
1 2 Non-Residential employ ment density 's deriv ed from the USGBC LEED BD+C: New Construction | v 4 - Default Occupancy Counts.

Residential residents per dw elling unit ex trapolated from American Community Surv ey 2020 5-Year Density Assumptions
Estimates for the City of Santee: Table B25032 & B25033.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 14 December 2024 City of Santee
Average Unit Sizes
To meet AB602 requirement five (5), this Report calculated the average unit size for single family residential and multi-family units based on the estimated average size of planned new development within each land use category in the City. The average unit size is based on the livable square footage of the residential unit for all residential land uses. This Report derived the unit sizes from the City of Santee building permit records.

Basing the average unit size on livable square footage for all residential units is not only consistent with industry standard for fee calculations, it also provides a strong nexus between the impact of the unit and the fee amount. A good example of this industry standard are school fees in California. In California school fees are based on assessable space, which means a quantity equal to the area (expressed in square feet) within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including the carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure or similar structure.

As stated previously, to accurately capture the impact of a residential project on capital facilities for high-density multi-family residential projects with communal spaces, the communal spaces (i.e., clubhouse, maintenance facility, gym, etc.) will not be assessed impact fees as the impact is assumed to be captured in the residential fees. Areas that contain employees and are accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be charged impact fees according to use. The non-residential area accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be based on the useable size of that area. The usable square footage is the actual area of a space as measured within the demising exterior walls of that space. Including areas that contain employees that are accessible by the public captures the additional impact these new facilities will have on the backbone facilities in the City.

Table 3-5 summarizes the estimated average size of planned new development within each residential land use category utilized for this study.

Table 3-5: Residential Land Use Average Unit Size
The City will monitor the average size of housing units in the City based on new developments on an annual basis and if the size of units on average are significantly different than anticipated, the fees will be updated as part of the annual update for the fee adjustment to reflect this change in order to ensure the fee program collects the anticipated level of funding.

Land Use
Average SF
Assumption
Residential (Units) (1)
Single Family 2,200
Multi-Family 1,600
Sources:
1 City of Santee Building Permit records.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 15 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 4 Public Facilities Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the need for additional passive and active park facilities and recreational community buildings to accommodate new development in the City and the fees that are necessary in order to ensure that new development provides adequate funding to meet those needs. This Nexus Study updates the methodology of the existing Public Facilities Fee and recommends updated fees.

The Public Facilities Fee is made up of two components, Park Construction and Recreation Facilities such as community centers. Residential development in the City will pay the Public Facilities Fee at building permit issuance.

For the Park Construction Component, the park cost was estimated based on the existing City adopted standard of five (5) acres of developed parkland per 1,000 residents. The Public Facilities Fee is for facility development cost only and does not include parkland acquisition costs, which is acquired through the Quimby Act which requires developers to either dedicate land to satisfy their parkland requirement or pay an in-lieu fee. Please see Chapter 8 of this study for further detail on the Parks-in-Lieu Fee. The Public Facilities Fee applies only to new residential development.

The Public Facilities Fee also includes the cost of recreation facilities. The Public Facilities Fee recreation component is calculated using the Planned Facilities Methodology taking into account the cost of future recreation facilities.

Service Population
The Public Facilities Fee is not applied to non-residential development because workers typically do not use park and community recreation facilities.

Current Level of Service
Per AB602, when applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. Table 4-1 describes the existing Public Facilities provided by the City using facility information and valuation based upon Property Insurance valuation.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 16 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-1: Existing Public Facilities
Table 4-2 calculates the existing level of service per resident by dividing the total cost of the existing Public Facilities by the existing resident population. The existing level of service exceeds the proposed fee level.

Facility Address Size Cost Per Unit Total Cost
Recreation Centers SF
Santee Teen Center @ Big Rock Park 8125 Arlette St. 1,648 204,387 $ City Hall - Building 7 10601 - 10629 Magnolia Ave. 6,222 1,333,423 $ City Hall - Building 8A & 8P 10601 - 10629 Magnolia Ave. 6,222 1,307,487 $ Subtotal Recreation Centers $ 2,845,297
Recreation Facilities SF
City of Santee Aquatic Center (operated by YMCA) 10123 Riverwalk Drive 25,116 3,621,546 $ Town Center Community Park, Sports Complex
(operated by Sportsplex USA) 9951 Riverwalk Drive 7,527 3,320,484 $ Subtotal Recreation Facilities $ 6,942,030
Park Facilities Acre
Big Rock Park 8125 Arlette St. 5.00 $ 3,625,000 725,000 $ Deputy Ken Collier Park 9206 Via De Cristina 0.51 $ 369,750 725,000 $ Mast Park 9125 Carlton Hills Blvd. 61.16 $ 44,341,000 725,000 $ Mast Park West Trail 9200 Carlton Hiulls Blvd. 43.26 $ 31,363,500 725,000 $ Shadow Hill Park 9161 Shadow Hill Rd. 5.69 $ 4,125,250 725,000 $ Sky Ranch Park 5850 Cala Lily St. 1.36 $ 986,000 725,000 $ Town Center Park - East 550 Park Center Dr. 55.00 $ 39,875,000 725,000 $ Town Center Park - West 9545 Cuyamaca St. 10.20 $ 7,395,000 725,000 $ Walker Preserve 9500 Magnolia Ave 105.08 $ 76,183,000 725,000 $ West Hills Park 8790 Mast Blvd. 8.41 $ 6,097,250 725,000 $ Woodglen Vista Park 10250 Woodglen Vista Dr. 15.00 $ 10,875,000 725,000 $ Weston Park 9050 Trailmark Way 4.47 $ 3,240,750 725,000 $ Subtotal Park Facilities $ 228,476,500
Total Facilities $ 238,263,827
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 17 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-2: Existing Level of Service per Resident
Planned Level of Service
The City has established a goal for parks at five (5) acres of developed public parkland per 1,000 residents, per the General Plan and Parks and Recreation Master Plan. This analysis is based on the existing City standard of five (5) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, where new development will contribute and develop five (5) acres of developed public parkland per 1,000 residents. New development will be required to meet the standard of five (5) acres of developed public parkland per 1,000 residents with this fee. Applying the General Plan standard to new development is consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act, as outlined in Government Code Section 66001, “A fee shall not include the costs attributable to existing deficiencies in public facilities, but may include the costs attributable to the increased demand for public facilities reasonably related to the development project in order to (1) refurbish existing facilities to maintain the existing level of service or (2) achieve an adopted level of service that is consistent with the general plan”.

As detailed in Table 4-3, the existing level of service is identified and exceeds this City Standard.

In compliance with Government Code Section 66001, the City Standard is utilized for the Park Facilities Fee as it is a City Standard set by the adopted General Plan. New development is expected to pay the fee that results in meeting the City Standard and will not be used to fund existing deficiencies.

The recreation component is new developments’ fair share of planned recreation facilities in the City.

Description Value
Existing Facilities
Recreation Centers $ 2,845,297
Recreation Facilities $ 6,942,030
Park Facilities(1) $ 228,476,500
Subtotal Facilities $ 238,263,827
Soft Costs (2) $ 95,305,531
Existing Fund Balance $ 8,921,073
Total Costs $ 342,490,431
Existing Service Population (3)
58,086
Total Existing Level of Service per Resident $ 5,896.26 Notes:
1 2
3 Ex isting Facilities v alues deriv ed from insurance v aluation of ex isting Recreation buildings and Park Facilities Costs v alued at $725,000/acre.

Soft Costs include: 10% - Construction Contingency , 15% - Design/Env ironmental, and 15% - Construction Admin/Inspection.

Ex isting Serv ice population comprises of City resident population and w orker population (w eighted at 0.37 based on a 45 hour w ork w eek).

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 18 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-3: Existing Level of Service for Parkland
Fee Methodology
The Public Facilities Fee is calculated using the Planned Facilities Methodology taking into account the future recreation facilities and the General Plan Standard taking into account City established park acreage standard new development contributes towards. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, the Planned Facility Method “Estimates the costs for future facilities needed to serve new development based on a long range expenditure plan for these future facility costs.” This method is appropriate when planned facilities are mostly for the benefit of new development. Per the “Impact Fee Nexus Template”, the Planned Facilities Methodology estimates the costs for future facilities needed to serve new development based on a long range expenditure plan for these future facility costs. This should include identifying what types of public facilities will be needed in the future to serve new development and their associated costs, which may include refurbishment of existing facilities to maintain the existing level of service or achieving an adopted level of service that is consistent with the General Plan.

The park facilities component uses the Planned Facility Methodology based on the General Plan Standard methodology for calculating the fee. The fees are based on the future developed public parkland needed to maintain the adopted General Plan standard of five (5) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents.

Table 4-4 calculates new developments fair share of recreation facilities based on new future residents as a percentage of the total residents at Buildout.

Description Acres
Existing Parkland (1)
Park Acreages 315.14
Existing Service Population (2)
58,086
Total Existing Level of Service per Resident 5.43
Notes:
1 2
Ex isting parkland data from the City of Santee.

Ex isting Serv ice population comprises of just residents and does not factor in non-residential.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 19 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-4: Population Allocation for Recreation Facilities Table 4-5 calculates the Recreation Cost per resident by summing up future planned facilities costs attributable to the fee program, allocates the cost to new development based on population, and divides by the future service population. Planned Recreation Facilities were sourced from the City of Santee’s AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report (2023).

Table 4-5 shows the percent attributable to new development.

Table 4-5: Planned New Public Facilities
Table 4-6 calculates the Park Facilities cost per resident by dividing the cost of park construction per acre by the City standard of 5.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Fee revenues may be used to construct park improvements and facilities on land dedicated by developers in accordance with the City’s Quimby Ordinance or though land purchased through the payment of the proposed Parks-in-Lieu Fee (see Chapter 8).

Description Value
Population
Existing Service Population (Residents) 58,086
Total Buildout Service Population (Residents) 72,901
Net Future Population 14,815
Population Allocation
Existing Service Population 80%
Future Additional Population 20%
Total Population 100%
Description Construction Cost Size (SF)
Attributable to
Fee Program3
Cost Attributable to
Fee Program
Recreation Facilities
Santee Community Center (1) $ 12,500 21,000,000 20% 4,200,000 $ Total Recreation Facilities Cost $ 4,200,000
Future Service Population (2)
14,815
Recreation Cost per Resident $ 283.50
Notes:
1 2
3 Costs attributable to the fee program are based on population grow th.

Other funding sources for this community center, including ex isting fund balance, are show n in the adopted Santee CIP 2024.

Future Serv ice Population does not include w orkers.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 20 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-6: Park Facilities Construction Costs per Resident Table 4-7 identifies the public facilities cost per capita by taking the future cost of public facilities improvements and dividing by the future service population.

Table 4-7: Public Facility Cost per Resident
Fee Summary
The Public Facilities Fee per unit is calculated by multiplying the cost per capita by the average number of residents per unit type (density). The fee per unit must then be converted to a fee per square foot by taking the total fee per unit and dividing by the estimated average unit size for each land use to arrive at the fee per square foot. These calculations are shown in Table 4-8.

Table 4-8: Public Facilities Fee Cost Summary
Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections
Based upon the projected new population growth, new development will contribute roughly 74 acres to the City’s park system. Given the nature of new development and the fact that neighborhood parks are typically built and dedicated by the developer, the exact identification of future parks are difficult to predict.

Park Construction
Park Construction Cost per Acre (1) $ 725,000
Required Acres/1,000 Residents (2) 5.0
Park Facilities Cost per Resident 3,625.00 $
Notes:
1 2
Park Construction Cost per acre estimated based on last City Neighborhood park construction cost (Weston Park).

The City 's Parks and Recreation Master Plan set's the City 's standard of public parkland at 5 acres for ev ery 1,000 people.

Public Facilities Cost per Resident
Recreation Cost per Resident 283.50 $
Park Facilities Cost per Resident 3,625.00 $
Total Cost per Resident 3,908.50 $
Land Use Cost Per Resident Density Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family 3,908.50 $ 2.93 11,451.91 $ 2,200 5.21 $
Multi Family 3,908.50 $ 2.37 9,263.15 $ 1,600 5.79 $
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 21 December 2024 City of Santee
Santee Municipal Code (SMC) Chapter 12.40, Park Lands Dedication establishes the provisions for dedication of land, payment of in-lieu fee or a combination of both for the purpose of providing park and recreation facilities to serve future residents of a subdivision development. In most cases, developers build new neighborhood parks on behalf of the City as a condition of residential subdivision construction and to fulfill their Quimby park acreage dedication requirements.

Developer-built parks can often be delivered faster than City-built park projects due to economies of scale as developers are already building within their subdivisions and the constraint in City staff resources. Developers who build and dedicate parks, will be given credits against their park component of the Public Facilities Fee. Due to this requirement, it is not possible nor necessary to include a CIP list for neighborhood parks. Should the park construction component of the Public Facilities Fee be collected, the City will allocate these to new parks through the City’s CIP process.

As for Community Parks, developers typically pay the fee instead of building the community park due to the large size and advanced planning community parks require, however in some cases community parks are built by developers. The Fanita Ranch Specific Plan includes 31.2 acres for a community park, which includes 19.7 active acres and 11.5 passive community park. Per the public park credit provisions set forth in City’s Municipal Code Section 12.40.110, developed park land dedicated to and maintained by the City of Santee will receive up to 100 percent park credit.

Developed park land maintained by an HOA and trail systems will receive up to 50 percent credit per the private park credit provisions in SMC Section 12.40.100. Per the Fanita Ranch Specific Plan, the developer plans to dedicate this land. The Community Park is included in the CIP, which is Table A-1 in Appendix A.

Table 4-9 summarizes the anticipated Public Facilities Fee revenue. The revenue will be available to expand the City’s Park and Recreation facilities to meet the needs of new residents. Based on the population estimates in this Nexus Study and using the City General Plan standard of 5 acres per 1,000 residents, it is anticipated that approximately 74.08 additional acres of parks facilities are needed to meet the needs of the City, plus recreation facilities, at Buildout at a cost of approximately $58 million.

Table 4-9: Public Facilities Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
SF
Assumptions
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (units)
Single Family 5.21 $ 1,444 2,200 16,551,128 $
Multi Family 5.79 $ 4,466 1,600 41,373,024 $
Total $ 57,924,152
Notes:
1 The proposed fee does not include the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 22 December 2024 City of Santee
Nexus Requirement Summary
The Public Facilities Fee component of the DIF program meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.

Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.

The purpose of the Public Facilities Fee is to fund the park and recreation facility needs generated by new development in the City. Each new resident creates a demand for additional park and recreation facilities. The City’s adopted standard is to provide 5 acres of parkland for each 1,000 residents. In order to accommodate these needs, new park facilities will be built and/or existing park facilities will be expanded. The City has planned future recreation facilities and each new resident creates a demand for additional recreation facilities. In order to accommodate these needs, new recreation facilities will be built or existing recreation facilities will be expanded. Table 4-6 and Table 4-7 calculate the parks and recreation cost per capita based on the City standard for parks and the estimated construction cost and planned recreation facilities.

Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.

The Public Facilities Fee will be used to fund new park and recreation development in order to meet the City’s General Plan and Parks and Recreation Master Plan standards discussed in this chapter. Park expansion is necessary to meet the City’s adopted standards of five acres of parkland for each 1,000 new residents. In most cases, developers build new neighborhood parks on behalf of the City as a condition of residential subdivision construction and to fulfill their Quimby park acreage dedication requirements. The location of the neighborhood parks will be determined based on the location of the new development project, as they are typically located within each development. The recreation component of the fee will be used to fund new or expand existing recreation facilities, such as the planned Community Center. The City has 31.2 acres of community park planned in Fanita Ranch, and it is anticipated that the developer will dedicate this acreage for the City to develop. As future developments come online and the Public Facilities Fee is collected, the City will identify future community park sites to program the remaining acres. The anticipated fee revenue to fund these facilities at Buildout is shown on Table 4-9.

Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

The fee will be used to fund new parks and recreation facilities that are necessary to serve the increased residents in the City. New residential development generates additional residents which increases the demand for park and recreation facilities. The Public Facilities Fee is calculated using the City’s General Plan standard of five (5) acres of park per 1,000 residents and planned recreation facilities. Residential development is responsible for paying its fair share to meet the City’s standard and the cost of recreation facilities attributable to new development. Non-residential uses do not pay the fee since they do not generate additional residents and workers have minimal impact on the City’s park and recreation system.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 23 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 4-6 and Table 4-7 calculate the cost per capita and then allocates the cost to each development type based on the estimated persons per household. Table 4-8 then calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size. By basing the fee on the size of the unit and the estimated number of new residents that is anticipated to be generated by the addition of that square footage, the fee is directly correlated to the increased need for new parks.

Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

Each new residential development is anticipated to generate new residents. The addition of new residents creates the need for new parks and recreation facilities to meet the City’s General Plan park standard of five (5) acres per 1,000 residents and planned recreation facilities. The fee is directly correlated to the number of new residents expected to be generated by each type of development. Non-residential development does not pay for parks as non-residential developments do not generate a significant demand for park and recreation facilities. Residential development pays its fair share based on the estimated persons the new unit is expected to generate.

Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

As new residential units are constructed, new park facilities are necessary to meet the City’s General Plan standard of 5 acres of park per 1,000 residents. New recreation facilities are necessary based on new developments fair share of the planned facilities. The Public Facilities Fee is calculated by totaling the Recreation (Table 4-6) and Park Facilities (Table 4-7) costs per resident.

The cost per capita is then allocated to each residential land use based on the persons per household each unit is expected to generate and divided by the average unit size in square feet to determine the fee per square foot as shown in Table 4-8. Since the need for park and recreation facilities is based on the number of new residents, calculating the fee based on the number of persons each unit is expected to generate and converting to a fee per square feet, ensures that each new residential unit is paying only its fair share of the required facilities.

By determining the fee based on the estimated new residents that would be generated by new development, each new residential unit is paying only its fair share of the facilities required. Nonresidential land uses are not assessed a Public Facilities Fee as non-residential development will not generate an increase in park and recreation facility demand.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 24 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 5 Traffic Signal Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the City’s Traffic Signal Fee. The proposed Citywide Traffic Signal Fee covers the costs of maintaining existing traffic signals and construction of new traffic signals to meet the needs of new development. The Traffic Signal Fee uses the System Plan Method to calculate the fee. The System Plan Method utilizes an integrated approach to allocate the cost of existing facilities and the costs of planned facilities to the total development in the study area.

As shown in Table 5-1, the future traffic signal facilities costs were developed by the City based on facilities necessary to serve new development.

Table 5-1: Traffic Signal Facilities – Planned Facilities Facility/Project Major Street Minor Street Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Traffic Signal Phases
New Signal - 6 Phase Signal Magnolia Ave Princess Joann Rd 6 415,000 415,000.00 $ New Signal - 6 Phase Signal Cottonwood Ave Riverview Pkwy 6 415,000 415,000.00 $ New Signal - 8 Phase Signal Woodside Ave Mission Del Magnolia / Riderwood Terrace 8 450,000 450,000.00 $ New Signal - 8 Phase Signal Mission Gorge Rd Marrokal Ln 6 415,000 415,000.00 $ New Pedestrian Signal - Hawk Mission Gorge Rd Forester Creek n/a 220,000 220,000.00 $ New Pedestrian Signal - Hawk Cuyamaca St South River Trail n/a 220,000 220,000.00 $ New Pedestrian Signal - Hawk Prospect Ave Forester Creek n/a 220,000 220,000.00 $ Subtotal Traffic Signal $ 2,355,000.00
Traffic Signal Modifications QTY
Update/replace traffic signal cabinet and controllers Various - 4 49,000 $ 196,000.00 $ Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades Various - 11 9,800 $ 107,800.00 $ Audible Pedestrian Signal Button Installation Various - 28 14,000 $ 392,000.00 $ Smart Signals and Controller/Detection Upgrades Various Arterials - 21 80,000 $ 1,680,000.00 $ Signal Modification Carlton Oaks Dr Wethersfield Rd n/a 439,000.00 $ Signal Modification Mast Blvd Carlton Hills Blvd n/a 203,900.00 $ Subtotal Traffic Signal Modifications $ 3,018,700.00
Communications QTY
Install new fiberoptic communication Magnolia Ave Park Center to Riverview Pkwy 2,000 108 $ 56,000.00 $ Install new fiberoptic communication Mission Gorge Rd Fanita to Father Junipero 10,500 108 $ 504,000.00 $ Subtotal Communications $ 560,000.00
Total Traffic Signal Facilities Costs(1) $ 5,933,700.00 1 Item costs include markup for design (15%), construction admin (15%), Contingency (10%).

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 25 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 5-2 describes the existing Traffic Signal Facilities provided by the City using facility information and valuation based upon Property Insurance valuation.

Table 5-2: Existing Traffic Signal Facilities (page 1 of 2)

Facility Major Street Minor Street Unit Total Cost
Traffic Signal Phases
Traffic Signal City ID #1 Mast Boulevard West Hills High School 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #2 Mast Boulevard Weston Drive 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #3 Mast Boulevard Medina Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #4 Mast Boulevard Pebble Beach Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #5 Mast Boulevard Fanita Parkway 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #6 Mast Boulevard Carlton Hills Boulevard 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #7 Mast Boulevard Halberns Boulevard 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #8 Mast Boulevard Cuyamaca Street 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #9 Mast Boulevard Bilteer Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #10 Mast Boulevard Park Center Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #11 Mast Boulevard Magnolia Avenue 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #12 Mission Gorge Road Father Junipero Serra Trail 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #13 Mission Gorge Road West Hills Parkway 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #14 Mission Gorge Road Rancho Fanita Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #15 Mission Gorge Road Big Rock Road 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #16 Mission Gorge Road Mesa Road 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #17 Mission Gorge Road Fanita Drive 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #18 Mission Gorge Road Carlton Hills Boulevard 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #19 Mission Gorge Road Marketplace / Kohls 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #20 Mission Gorge Road Post Office / Lowes 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #21 Mission Gorge Road Town Center Parkway / Olive Lane 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #22 Mission Gorge Road Cuyamaca Street 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #23 Mission Gorge Road Mission Greens Road 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #24 Mission Gorge Road Riverview Parkway / Tamberly Way 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #25 Mission Gorge Road Cottonwood Avenue 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #26 Mission Gorge Road Edgemoor Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #27 Mission Gorge Road Magnolia Avenue / Woodside Avenue 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #28 Cuyamaca Street Prospect Avenue 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #29 Cuyamaca Street Buena Vista Avenue 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #30 Cuyamaca Street Trolley Square 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #31 Cuyamaca Street Town Center Parkway 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #32 Cuyamaca Street Riverpark Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #33 Cuyamaca Street Riverwalk Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #34 Magnolia Avenue Prospect Avenue 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #35 Magnolia Avenue Alexander Way 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #36 Magnolia Avenue Rockvill Street 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #37 Magnolia Avenue Riverview Parkway / New Frontier 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #38 Magnolia Avenue Park Center Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #39 Magnolia Avenue Braverman Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #40 Magnolia Avenue Carefree Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #41 Magnolia Avenue 2nd Street 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #42 Magnolia Avenue El Nopal 8 4 $ 10,000.00 Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 26 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 5-2: Existing Traffic Signal Facilities (page 2 of 2) Trips
To calculate the Traffic Signal Fee and the Traffic Mitigation Fee, this study uses Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) common Trip Generation Rates sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition as the base for trip generation assumptions. It is based on the average daily trips which means the total of all one-direction vehicle movements with either the origin or destination inside the study site that includes existing, primary, pass by, and diverted linked trips and is calculated in accordance with the procedures contained in Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition published by the ITE. For the Traffic Signal Fee, these assumptions are used to calculate the total cost per capita. For the Traffic Mitigation Fee, these assumptions are also used to calculate the proportion of planned facilities that are attributable to new development.

Table 5-3 identifies the Trip Rates per land use. The trip rates are multiplied against the land uses from Table 3-1 in Section 3 to calculate the vehicle trips.

Facility Major Street Minor Street Unit Total Cost
Traffic Signal Phases
Traffic Signal City ID #43 Magnolia Avenue Woodglen Vista / Len Street 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #44 Prospect Avenue Fanita Drive 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #45 Prospect Avenue Ellsworth Lane 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #46 Prospect Avenue Atlas View Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #47 Prospect Avenue Olive Lane 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #48 Prospect Avenue Cottonwood Avenue 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #49 Prospect Avenue Graves Avenue 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #50 Carlton Hills Boulevard Willowgrove Avenue 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #51 Carlton Hills Boulevard Carlton Oaks Drive 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #52 Carlton Hills Boulevard Stoyer Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #53 Carlton Oaks Drive Fanita Parkway 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #54 Carlton Oaks Drive Pebble Beach Drive 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #55 Carlton Oaks Drive Wethersfield Road 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #56 Town Center Parkway Costco / Walmart 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #57 Town Center Parkway Buffalo Wild Wings 6 375,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #58 Town Center Parkway Riverview Parkway 8 410,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #59 Post Office Lowes 4 345,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #60 Trolley Square South 4 345,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #61 Trolley Square North 4 345,000.00 $ Traffic Signal City ID #62 Woodside Avenue Davidann Road 6 375,000.00 $ Subtotal Traffic Signal $ 24,105,000.00
Communications LF
Interconnect Citywide Citywide 74,500 10,430,000.00 $
Wireless Citywide Citywide 12 46,800.00 $
Subtotal Communications $ 10,476,800.00
Total Facilities $ 34,581,800.00
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 27 December 2024 City of Santee

Table 5-3: Trip Rates per Land Use
To calculate the Existing Trips per land use (as shown in Table 5-4), existing residential units and existing non-residential building square footage (per 1,000 SF) is multiplied by the Trips per Unit or Trips per 1,000 square feet assumptions respectively from Table 5-3.

Table 5-4: Existing Vehicle Trips
Land Use Unit
Trip
Generation
Rate
Residential
Single Family Per Dwelling Unit 10.00
Multi Family(1) Per Dwelling Unit 5.64
Non-Residential
Commercial(2) Per 1,000 Building SF 22.87
Office Per 1,000 Building SF 12.62
Industrial(3)
Per 1,000 Building SF 2.92
Notes:
1 2
3 Trip Generation for Multi-Family uses the av erage of the trip generation assumption for multifamily low -rise and mid-rise housing.

ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (shop center and strip retail plaza).

Industrial assumption is the av erage of general light industrial, industrial park, manufacturing, and w arehousing.

Land Use
Existing
Units / SF
Trips per
Unit /
1,000 Bldg. SF
Total Trips
(Rounded)
Residential Units per Unit
Single Family 13,801 10.00 138,010
Multi Family 7,447 5.64 42,001
Non-Residential 1,000 Building SF per 1,000 Building SF Commercial1
2,309 22.87 52,807
Office 190 12.62 2,398
Industrial 2,683 2.92 7,834
Total 243,050
Notes:
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (strip commercial).

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 28 December 2024 City of Santee
To calculate the New Trips per land use (as shown in Table 5-5), projected new residential units and projected new non-residential building square footage (per 1,000 SF) is multiplied by the Trips per Unit or Trips per 1,000 square feet assumptions respectively from Table 5-3.

Table 5-5: New Vehicle Trips
Table 5-6 calculates the buildout trips using the buildout land uses multiplied by the Trips per Unit or Trips per 1,000 square feet assumptions respectively from Table 5-3.

Table 5-6: Total Vehicle Trips
Land Use
Additional
Units / SF
Trips per
Unit /
1,000 Bldg. SF
Total Trips
(Rounded)
Residential Units per Unit
Single Family 1,444 10.00 14,440
Multi Family 4,466 5.64 25,188
Non-Residential 1,000 Building SF per 1,000 Building SF Commercial1
1,020 22.87 23,327
Office 84 12.62 1,060
Industrial 1,266 2.92 3,697
Total 67,712
Notes:
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (strip commercial).

Land Use
Total
Units / SF
Trips per
Unit /
1,000 Bldg. SF
Total Trips
(Rounded)
Residential Units per Unit
Single Family 15,245 10.00 152,450
Multi Family 11,913 5.64 67,189
Non-Residential 1,000 Building SF per 1,000 Building SF Commercial1
3,329 22.87 76,134
Office 274 12.62 3,458
Industrial 3,949 2.92 11,531
Total 310,762
Notes:
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (strip commercial).

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 29 December 2024 City of Santee
Service Population
Demand for traffic signal facilities is based on the total trips generated at Buildout conditions. The Traffic Signal Fee utilizes the land use trip generation assumptions presented in Table 5-6 for the various residential and non-residential land uses based on Institute of Transportation Engineers common Trip Generation Rates (average daily trips) sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition.

Cost Summary
The Traffic Signal Fee will fund the expansion and construction of new traffic signal facilities necessary to serve new growth. These facilities will be necessary to meet the demands of the growth of the City at Buildout. The cost for the Traffic Signal Fee is based on the integrated cost of the current and future facilities. As new development occurs, there are additional trips associated with the new development, which correlates to a need for additional traffic signal improvements.

The Nexus Study acknowledges that the existing development will also benefit from these transportation improvements once they are constructed and therefore existing development has a fair share of these improvements. New development also benefits from the existing network of traffic signals and improvements and therefore new development will fund the integrated system of facilities at the existing standard attributable to new development.

The City will review the potential funding sources for traffic signal projects to determine the appropriate funding mechanisms as projects move forward as well as identify funding sources through the CIP process and identify action plans in updates to the City's Strategic Plan. It is important for new development to fund their fair share of their impact on transportation facilities.

Fee Methodology
The Traffic Signal Fee uses the System Plan Method to calculate the fee. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, the System Plan Method utilizes an integrated approach to allocate the cost of existing facilities and the costs of planned facilities to the total development in the study area. This method is appropriate when calculating a systemwide fee in which new development will fund an integrated system of facilities at the future standard attributable to new development. By spreading the costs of an integrated system incorporating the existing facilities and planned facilities costs to the total development in the study area, this ensures that new development only pays their proportional share of the total system costs and is not responsible for rectifying any existing deficiencies.

The Traffic Signal Fee is calculated based on the cost per trip generated by existing and new development. The total cost of the facilities identified in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2 is spread over the anticipated total number of trips at buildout (existing and generated by future development), as shown in Table 5-6, to calculate the cost per trip. The cost per trip is calculated by taking the total cost of traffic signal facilities, calculating the existing trips and future additional trips, dividing the total cost by the total trips to derive at a cost per trip. This calculation is shown in Table 5-7.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 30 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 5-7: Traffic Signal Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip The Traffic Signal Fee calculated on Table 5-7 is the maximum justifiable fee using the System Plan method, but Table 5-8 shows the fee calculation for the fee used in this analysis based on the facilities necessary to serve new development. The Traffic Signal Fee used in this analysis is calculated based on the cost per trip generated by new development. The total cost of the facilities identified in Table 5-1 is spread over the anticipated total number of trips at buildout (generated by future development), as shown in Table 5-5, to calculate the cost per trip. This calculation is shown in Table 5-8.

Value
Existing Facilities (1)
Traffic Signal $ 24,105,000
Communications $ 10,476,800
Subtotal Existing Facilities 34,581,800 $
Soft Costs (2) $ 13,832,720
Existing Fund Balance 353,190 $
Total Existing Costs $ 48,767,710
New Facilities (3)
Traffic Signal $ 2,355,000
Traffic Signal Modifications 3,018,700 $
Communications $ 560,000
Subtotal New Facilities 5,933,700 $
Soft Costs (2) $ -
Total New Costs $ 5,933,700
Total Traffic Signal Cost $ 54,701,410
Total Buildout Trip Generation (4)
310,762
Cost per Trip $ 176.02
Notes:
v alue of ex isting facilities.
and 15% - Construction Admin/Inspection.
3 Based on new facilities prov ided by the City .
land use assumptions.
1 Ex isting Facilities v alues deriv ed from City Engineer cost estimate of replacement 2 Soft Costs include 10% - Construction Contingency , 15% - Design and Env ironmental, 4 Total Trip Generation deriv ed using ex isting residential units and non-residential Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 31 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 5-8: Traffic Signal Existing Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip Fee Summary
The Traffic Signal Fee for new development is calculated by multiplying the cost per trip identified in Table 5-8 by trip generation rate for each land use. The residential fee per unit is converted to a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per unit by the unit size estimated in Table 3-5. Table 5-9 shows the proposed new Traffic Signal Fees for new development.

Table 5-9: Traffic Signal Fee Summary
Reduced Traffic Fee
Residential developments near transit stations generate fewer trips than traditional land use configurations that rely on vehicles as the primary mode of transportation. According to various transportation studies, measurable trip reductions result for projects that are near transit stations and where there are a diversity of land uses that promote connectivity and walkability. To account for the reduced trip rates generated by projects meeting the above characteristics, an additional trip adjustment factor is applied to new residential land uses meeting the following criteria:

Cost per Trip
Traffic Signal Facilities 5,933,700.00 $
Less Fund Balance (1) $ (353,190.00)
Total Traffic Signal Facilities 5,580,510.00 $
Additional Trip Generation 67,712 $
Cost per Trip 82.42 $
Notes:
1 Fund Balance as of 06/30/2024 and prov ided by the City 's Finance Department.

Land Use Cost Per Trip Trip Generation (1) Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family 82.42 $ 10.00 824.20 $ 2,200 0.37 $
Multi Family 82.42 $ 5.64 464.85 $ 1,600 0.29 $
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF)
Commercial (2) $ 22.87 1,884.95 82.42 $
Office 82.42 $ 12.62 1,040.14 $
Industrial 82.42 $ 2.92 240.67 $
Notes:
1 Institute of Transportation Engineers common Trip Generation Rates (PM Trip Rate) sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. 2 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 32 December 2024 City of Santee

1. The housing development is located within one-half mile of a transit station and there is direct access between the project and the transit station along a barrier-free walkable pathway not exceeding one-half mile in length.

2. Convenience retail uses, including a store that sells food, are located within one-half mile of the housing development.

3. The housing development provides either the minimum number of parking spaces required by the local ordinance, or for residential units, no more than one onsite parking space for zero to two bedroom units, and two onsite parking spaces for three or more bedroom units, whichever is less.

For purposes of this reduction, the definition of transit station shall be defined by California Government Code Section 65460.1, “Transit station” means a rail or light-rail station, ferry terminal, bus hub, or bus transfer station. Also, a “housing development” shall be defined by California Government Code Section 66005.1, which is a development project with common ownership and financing consisting of residential use or mixed use where not less than 50 percent of the floorspace is for residential use.

Commercial trips often coincide with other trips (i.e., Person A stops by the store on their way home from work, Person B stops by a restaurant after grocery shopping, etc.) This “pass-by” trip reduction amount is factored into the Commercial trip generation estimates (Table 5-3) as well as the fee for commercial land use in Table 5-9.

Revenue Projections
Table 5-10 summarizes the anticipated Traffic Signal Fee revenue collected at Buildout. The revenue will be used to fund the traffic signal facilities shown on Table 5-1.

Table 5-10: Anticipated Traffic Signal Fee Collection at Buildout Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
SF
Assumptions
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (Units) (SF)
Single Family 0.37 $ 1,444 2,200 1,175,416 $
Multi Family 0.29 $ 4,466 1,600 2,072,224 $
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Commercial 1,884.95 $ 1,020.34 1,923,290 $
Office 1,040.14 $ 83.92 87,289 $
Industrial 240.67 $ 1,266.30 304,760 $
Total $ 5,562,979
Notes:
1 The proposed fee does not include the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding. Rounded to nearest dollar.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 33 December 2024 City of Santee
Current Level of Service
Per AB602, when applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each traffic signal facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. As shown on Table 5-11, the proposed Traffic Signal Fee is less than the existing level of service.

Table 5-11: Existing Level of Service per Vehicle Trip
Nexus Requirement Summary
The proposed Traffic Signal Fee meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.

Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.

The purpose of the Traffic Signal Fee is to fund planned traffic signal facilities included in Table 5-1 to serve future development. In order to accommodate this need, new facilities must be built and/or existing facilities expanded.

Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.

The fee will be used to fund the planned traffic signal facilities identified in Table 5-1 that are necessary to serve increased demand. The City identified these future projects as the facilities that are required to mitigate the impact of new development in the City.

Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

The Traffic Signal Fee will be used to fund the new traffic signal facilities and improvements that are necessary to serve the increase in transportation demand due to new development. The cost of Description Value
Existing Facilities (1)
Traffic Signal $ 24,105,000
Communications $ 10,476,800
Subtotal Facilities $ 34,581,800
Soft Costs (2) $ 13,832,720
Existing Fund Balance $ 353,190
Total Costs $ 48,767,710
Existing Trip Generation (3)
243,050
Cost per Trip $ 200.65
Notes:
1 2
3 Ex isting Facilities v alues deriv ed from City Engineer cost estimate of replacement v alue of ex isting facilities.

Soft Costs include 10% - Construction Contingency , 15% - Design and Env ironmental, and 15% - Construction Ex isting Trip Generation deriv ed using ex isting residential units and non-residential land use assumptions.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 34 December 2024 City of Santee
the improvements is spread to each land use based on the number of trips generated by each land use. This correlation to trips ensures that each new development pays their fair share of the transportation costs.

The cost per trip calculations is shown in Table 5-8. The fee calculation is shown in Table 5-9.

Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

Each new residential and non-residential development within the City will generate additional trips that incrementally adds to the need for new traffic infrastructure and facilities to serve the increased residents and businesses within the City and ensure that traffic facilities can accommodate the increased demand. These facilities are provided by the City. Each new residential and nonresidential development pays an impact fee based on the additional trips that is expected to be generated by the new development. To accommodate these additional trips, new traffic signal improvements will be needed city-wide. Utilizing trips generated by each development ensures that each type of development pays their fair share of the required new traffic signal facilities. This calculation is shown in Table 5-9.

The Traffic Signal fee is based on the System Plan Method, which estimates the costs for an integrated system of existing and future facilities. The traffic signal facilities that are necessary for the new development are summarized in the planned improvements presented in Table 5-1. The existing traffic signal facilities are shown on Table 5-2. Each land use pays their fair share of costs based on the number of trips generated by that land use as shown in Table 5-7. The Traffic Signal Fee is calculated based on the cost per trip generated by existing and new development divided by the Buildout service population. The total cost of the facilities identified in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2 is spread over the anticipated total number of trips at buildout (existing and generated by future development), as shown in Table 5-6, to calculate the cost per trip. Utilizing trips ensures that each development pays their fair share of the cost.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 35 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 6 Traffic Mitigation Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the City’s Traffic Mitigation Fee. The proposed Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee covers the construction of new traffic facilities to meet the needs of new development.

As shown in Table 6-1, the future traffic mitigation facilities were developed by the City of Santee based on facilities necessary to serve new development. Facilities are based on the adopted FY 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Program Budget. The City does not anticipate any future major Traffic Mitigation improvements beyond the facilities identified in the CIP. If the City does determine future Traffic Mitigation improvements need to be added to the fee program, the fee would need to be updated.

Table 6-1: Traffic Mitigation Facilities – Planned Facilities Facility Description Total Project Cost
Percent Attributable to
New Development (1) Fee Program Cost
Traffic Mitigation Facility
Cottonwood Avenue River Crossing(2)
Extend Cottonwood Avenue from Riverview Parkway to northern end of Cottonwood Avenue $ 100% 20,786,000 20,786,000 $
Cottonwood Avenue Widening and Sidewalk Improvements
Widen Cottonwood Avenue and install street improvements between Mission Gorge Road and Prospect Avenue $ 21.79% 2,643,008 12,130,000 $ Graves Avenue Street Improvements Widen Graves Avenue from Pepper Drive to Prospect Avenue $ 21.79% 1,643,764 7,544,000 $ Magnolia Avenue Widening
Widen the west side of Magnolia Avenue from the San Diego River to Park Avenue $ 21.79% 1,042,823 4,786,000 $
Median Modification - Mission Gorge Road at Marketplace Realign center median on Mission Gorge Road at Marketplace and Post office to accommodate existing traffic volumes on Mission Gorge Road. $ 21.79% 122,019 560,000 $ Olive Lane Improvements
Widen Olive Land from the Forester Creek Bridge to Mission Gorge Road and install street improvements. $ 21.79% 620,987 2,850,000 $ Prospect Avenue Improvements - West
Widen Prospect Avenue from Mesa Road to Fanita Drive. Install street improvements and purchase right-of-way. $ 21.79% 4,633,871 21,267,000 $ Subtotal Traffic Mitigation Facilities $ 69,923,000 $ 31,492,471.65 Soft Cost: Construction Contingency (10%) $ 3,149,247.17 Soft Cost: Design and Environmental (15%) $ 4,723,870.75 Soft Cost: Construction Administration and Inspection (15%) $ 4,723,870.75 Total Traffic Mitigation Facilities Costs $ 44,089,460.32 Notes:
1 Percent attributable to new dev elopment based upon additional trips generated by new dev elopment ov er total ex isting and new trips. 2 Cottonw ood Av enue Riv er Crossing project is fully attributable to new dev elopment based on conv ersations w ith the City and the project is in a fully undev eloped area.

Source:

Adopted FY 2024-2028 Capital Improv ement Program Budget.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 36 December 2024 City of Santee
Service Population
Demand for traffic mitigation facilities is based on the additional trips that will be generated by new development through Buildout conditions. The Traffic Mitigation Fee utilizes the land use trip generation assumptions presented in Table 6-2 for the various residential and non-residential land uses based on Institute of Transportation Engineers common Trip Generation Rates (PM Trip Rate) sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition.

Table 6-2: Future Additional Trips
Cost Summary
The Traffic Mitigation Fee will fund the expansion and construction of new traffic mitigation facilities necessary to serve new growth. These facilities will be necessary to meet the demands of the growth of the City at Buildout. The percent attributable to new development is calculated as the proportion of new vehicle trips that will be generated by new growth in the City over the total trips at buildout, which is shown below. The cost attributable to the Cottonwood Avenue River Crossing project is 100 percent as this improvement is surrounded by undeveloped land and it is necessary to support new development.

Land Use
Additional
Units / SF
Trips per
Unit /
1,000 Bldg. SF
Total Trips
(Rounded)
Residential Units per Unit
Single Family 1,444 10.00 14,440
Multi Family 4,466 5.64 25,188
Non-Residential 1,000 Building SF per 1,000 Building SF Commercial1
1,020 22.87 23,327
Office 84 12.62 1,060
Industrial 1,266 2.92 3,697
Total 67,712
Notes:
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (strip commercial).

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 37 December 2024 City of Santee
As new development occurs, there are additional trips associated with the new development, which correlates to a need for additional traffic mitigation improvements. The Nexus Study acknowledges that the existing development will benefit from these transportation improvements once they are constructed and therefore existing developments’ fair share of the improvements (based on trip generation rates) is allocated to existing development and is not spread to new development.

The City will review the potential funding sources for transportation projects to determine the appropriate funding mechanisms as transportation projects move forward as well as identify funding sources through the CIP process and identify action plans in updates to the City's Strategic Plan. It is important for new development to fund their fair share of their impact on transportation facilities. As new development will impact the existing transportation infrastructure, this is a conservative approach that does not burden new development with any existing deficiencies.

Fee Methodology
The Traffic Mitigation Fee uses the Planned Facilities Method to calculate the fee. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, the Planned Facilities Method calculates the proposed fee based on the ratio of planned facilities to the increase in demand associated with new development. This method is appropriate when planned facilities have been define by a long range master plan or expenditure plan which includes specific facilities and cost estimates. As the Planned Facilities Method relies on a long range master plan that may change as the plan is implemented, fees based on this methodology need to be regularly updated to remain consistent with the project lists and current plans.

In order to distribute the share of project costs to each land use type, the total trips generated by new development must be calculated. To calculate the total number of new trips attributable to new development within the City Buildout, the growth projections, detailed in Chapter 3, are multiplied by the corresponding trip generation rates as derived from the Institute of Transportation Description Source Value
Trips
Existing Trips Table 5-4 243,050
Total Buildout Trips Table 5-6 310,762
Net Future Trips 67,712
Trips Allocation
Existing Trips 78.21%
Future Trips 21.79%
Total Trips 100.00%
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 38 December 2024 City of Santee
Engineers (ITE). The Traffic Mitigation Fee is calculated based on the cost per trip generated by new development. The total cost of the facilities attributed to new development identified in Table 6-1 is spread over the anticipated number of trips that will be generated by future development (as shown in Table 6-2) to calculate the cost per trip.

Residential trips are calculated by multiplying the anticipated growth in residential units by the corresponding density’s trip generation rates. Non-residential trips were calculated by multiplying the anticipated growth in 1,000 building square feet with the corresponding trip generation rates.

Commercial trips often coincide with other trips (i.e., Person A stops by the store on their way home from work, Person B stops by a restaurant after grocery shopping, etc.). Pass-by trips are a subset of trips traveling on a road that stops by a near-by commercial development. They are not new trips. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition notes all Retail and Services land uses are entitled to a "pass-by" trip reduction between forty to sixty percent (40-60%). This study assumes a fifty percent (50%) trip reduction for commercial.

To calculate the total number of new trips attributable to new development through Buildout, the growth projections, detailed in Chapter 3, are multiplied by the corresponding trip generation rates identified in Table 6-2.

Table 6-3 calculates the total number of existing trips attributable to existing development. The existing land uses and employees, detailed within Chapter 3, are multiplied by the corresponding trip generation rates identified in Table 6-3. Table 6-3 displays the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition trip generation rates for the land use types within this fee program. The existing trips are calculated to determine future developments responsibility as the total transportation cost is allocated between existing and future trips.

Table 6-3: Existing Trips
Land Use
Existing
Units / SF
Trips per
Unit /
1,000 Bldg. SF
Total Trips
(Rounded)
Residential Units per Unit
Single Family 13,801 10.00 138,010
Multi Family 7,447 5.64 42,001
Non-Residential 1,000 Building SF per 1,000 Building SF Commercial1
2,309 22.87 52,807
Office 190 12.62 2,398
Industrial 2,683 2.92 7,834
Total 243,050
Notes:
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40%-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial/retail center (strip commercial).

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 39 December 2024 City of Santee
The cost per trip is calculated by taking the total cost of the improvements identified as attributable to future within the City and dividing it by the future trips to determine the cost per trip. This calculation is shown in Table 6-4.

Table 6-4: Traffic Mitigation Facilities Cost per Vehicle Trip Fee Summary
The Traffic Mitigation Fee for new development is calculated by multiplying the cost per trip identified in Table 6-4 by trip generation rate for each land use. The residential fee per unit is converted to a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per unit by the unit size estimated in Table 3-4. Table 6-5 shows the proposed new Traffic Mitigation Fees for new development.

Table 6-5: Traffic Mitigation Fee Summary
Reduced Traffic Fee
Residential developments near transit stations generate fewer trips than traditional land use configurations that rely on vehicles as the primary mode of transportation. According to various Cost per Trip
Traffic Mitigation Facilities 44,089,460.32 $
Less Fund Balance (1) $ (4,231,223.00)
Total Mitigation Cost 39,858,237.32 $
Trip Generation 67,712 $
Cost per Trip 588.64 $
Notes:
1 Fund Balance as of 06/30/2024 and prov ided by the City 's Finance Department.

Land Use Cost Per Trip Trip Generation (1) Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family 588.64 $ 10.00 5,886.40 $ 2,200 2.68 $
Multi Family 588.64 $ 5.64 3,319.93 $ 1,600 2.07 $
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF)
Commercial (2) $ 22.87 13,462.20 588.64 $
Office $ 12.62 7,428.64 588.64 $
Industrial 588.64 $ 2.92 1,718.83 $
Notes:
1 Institute of Transportation Engineers common Trip Generation Rates (PM Trip Rate) sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. 2 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition notes all Retail and Serv ices land uses are entitled to a "pass-by " trip reduction betw een 40-60%. This study assumes a 50% trip reduction for commercial.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 40 December 2024 City of Santee
transportation studies, measurable trip reductions result for projects that are near transit stations and where there are a diversity of land uses that promote connectivity and walkability. To account for the reduced trip rates generated by projects meeting the above characteristics, an additional trip adjustment factor is applied to new residential land uses meeting the following criteria:

4. The housing development is located within one-half mile of a transit station and there is direct access between the project and the transit station along a barrier-free walkable pathway not exceeding one-half mile in length.

5. Convenience retail uses, including a store that sells food, are located within one-half mile of the housing development.

6. The housing development provides either the minimum number of parking spaces required by the local ordinance, or for residential units, no more than one onsite parking space for zero to two bedroom units, and two onsite parking spaces for three or more bedroom units, whichever is less.

Commercial trips often coincide with other trips (i.e., Person A stops by the store on their way home from work, Person B stops by a restaurant after grocery shopping, etc.) This “pass-by” trip reduction amount is factored into the Commercial trip generation estimates (Table 6-2) as well as the fee for commercial land use in Table 6-5.

Revenue Projections
Table 6-6 summarizes the anticipated Traffic Mitigation Fee revenue collected at Buildout. The revenue will be used to fund the traffic mitigation facilities shown on Table 6-1.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 41 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 6-6: Anticipated Traffic Mitigation Fee Collection at Buildout Nexus Requirement Summary
The proposed Traffic Mitigation Fee meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.

Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.

The purpose of the Traffic Mitigation Fee is to fund new developments’ share of planned traffic mitigation facilities included in Table 6-1 to serve future development. In order to accommodate this need, new facilities must be built and/or existing facilities expanded.

Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.

The fee will be used to fund the planned traffic mitigation facilities identified in Table 6-1 and detailed in Appendix B, that are necessary to serve increased demand. The improvements were identified through the current City Adopted FY 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Program Budget, City identified projects, and additional City discussions, as the facilities that are required to mitigate the impact of new development in the City.

Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

The Traffic Mitigation Fee will be used to fund new developments’ share of the new traffic mitigation facilities and improvements that are necessary to serve the increase in transportation demand due to new development. The cost of the improvements is spread to each land use based on the number of trips generated by each land use. This correlation to trips ensures that each new development pays their fair share of the transportation costs.

Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
SF
Assumptions
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (units)
Single Family 2.68 $ 1,444 2,200 8,513,824 $
Multi Family 2.07 $ 4,466 1,600 14,791,392 $
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF) (1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Commercial 13,462.20 $ 1,020.34 13,736,021 $
Office 7,428.64 $ 83.92 623,411 $
Industrial 1,718.83 $ 1,266.30 2,176,554 $
Total $ 39,841,202
Notes:
1 The proposed fee does not include the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 42 December 2024 City of Santee
The cost per trip calculations is shown in Table 6-4. The fee calculation is shown in Table 6-5.

Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

Each new residential and non-residential development within the City will generate additional trips that incrementally adds to the need for new traffic infrastructure and facilities to serve the increased residents and businesses within the City and ensure that traffic facilities can accommodate the increased demand. These facilities were identified through City discussions based on future growth of the City. Each new residential and non-residential development pays an impact fee based on the additional trips that is expected to be generated by the new development. To accommodate these additional trips, new traffic mitigation improvements will be needed city-wide. Utilizing trips generated by each development ensures that each type of development pays their fair share of the required new traffic mitigation facilities. This calculation is shown in Table 6-4.

The transportation facilities that are necessary for the new development are summarized in the planned improvements presented in Table 6-1. Each land use pays their fair share of costs based on the number of trips generated by that land use as shown in Table 6-2. Existing development is netted out from the analysis based on existing trips (calculated on Table 6-3), to ensure that future land uses only pays their fair share of the traffic improvements, as calculated in Table 6-1. The cost per trip is then spread to each land use based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers common Trip Generation Rates (PM Trip Rate) sourced from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition rates. This calculation is shown in Table 6-4. Utilizing trips ensures that each development pays their fair share of the cost.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 43 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 7 Drainage Fee
Background
The Drainage Fee is collected for the purpose of maintaining and servicing the existing drainage facilities in the City. The Drainage Fee is calculated using the Existing Inventory Methodology.

The existing inventory method uses a facility standard based on the ratio of existing facilities to the existing service population on a cost per unit or cost per square foot basis. Under this approach, new development funds the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development. By definition, the existing inventory method ensures that no facility deficiencies are spread to future development. This method is often used when a long range plan for new facilities is not available. An inventory of existing drainage facilities was provided by the City using GIS inventory of drainage facilities the City currently operates and maintains.

Current Level of Service
The current level of service is based on the value of the Drainage Facilities as shown below in Table 7-1.

To determine the current level of service, the value of the existing drainage facilities the cost per impervious acre is calculated in Table 7-2 by totaling the costs associated with the existing drainage facilities, adding the existing fund balance, and dividing by the existing developable impervious acres.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 44 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 7-1: Existing Drainage Facilities
Facility Quantity Unit Cost Per Unit Total Cost
Inlets
Catch Basin EA 10,000 331 $ 3,310,000 $
Type A EA 10,000 51 $ 510,000 $
Type B EA 10,000 817 $ 8,170,000 $
Type C EA 15,000 42 $ 630,000 $
Type J EA 10,000 16 $ 160,000 $
Other EA 10,000 286 $ 2,860,000 $
Subtotal Inlets $ 15,640,000
Cleanouts
Type A EA 8,500 700 $ 5,950,000 $
Type B EA 10,000 119 $ 1,190,000 $
Other EA 8,500 116 $ 986,000 $
Subtotal Cleanouts $ 8,126,000
Headwalls
Straight (Type A) EA 8,000 236 $ 1,888,000 $
Wing (Type U) EA 8,500 106 $ 901,000 $
Type L EA 8,000 12 $ 96,000 $
Other EA 8,000 130 $ 1,040,000 $
Subtotal Headwalls $ 3,925,000
Pipelines
36" Diameter Storm Drain LF 350 32,262 $ 11,291,700 $
39" Diameter Storm Drain LF 400 1,470 $ 588,000 $
42" Diameter Storm Drain LF 450 27,720 $ 12,474,000 $
45" Diameter Storm Drain LF 475 616 $ 292,600 $
48" Diameter Storm Drain LF 500 17,364 $ 8,682,000 $
54" Diameter Storm Drain LF 700 17,135 $ 11,994,500 $
60" Diameter Storm Drain LF 850 6,944 $ 5,902,400 $
66" Diameter Storm Drain LF 900 5,070 $ 4,563,000 $
69" Diameter Storm Drain LF 925 487 $ 450,475 $
72" Diameter Storm Drain LF 950 2,739 $ 2,602,050 $
84" Diameter Storm Drain LF 1,200 1,150 $ 1,380,000 $
96" Diameter Storm Drain LF 1,500 487 $ 730,500 $
Subtotal Pipelines $ 60,951,225
Subtotal Facilities $ 88,642,225
Soft Costs
Construction Contingency (10% ) $ 8,864,223
Design and Environmental (15% ) $ 13,296,334
Construction Admin / Inspection (15% ) $ 13,296,334
Total Facilities $ 124,099,115
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 45 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 7-2: Drainage Facilities Cost per Impervious Acre Planned Level of Service
The City’s drainage facilities serve both residents and businesses. Demand for services and associated facilities, is based on the City’s impervious acres. The City plans to maintain the current level of service cost per impervious acre, as shown on Table 7-2, with appropriate participation from new development. Per AB602, when applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. This Nexus Study identifies the existing level of service per impervious acre and based on the Nexus Study analysis and discussions with City staff, it has been deemed appropriate to maintain the existing level of service. As described below, this ensures that no facility deficiencies are spread to future development.

Fee Methodology
The Drainage Fee uses the Existing Inventory Method methodology for calculating the fee. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, with the Existing Inventory Method “New development will fund the expansion of facilities at the same standard as currently used to service existing development.” The fees are calculated based on the value of current facilities divided by existing impervious area. Future development will fund facilities at this same standard, which assumes that future facilities will be needed at the same level as current drainage facilities.

Description Value
Existing Facilities (1)
Inlets $ 15,640,000
Cleanouts $ 8,126,000
Headwalls $ 3,925,000
Pipelines $ 60,951,225
Subtotal Costs $ 88,642,225
Soft Costs $ 35,456,890
Existing Fund Balance $ 1,524,379
Total Costs $ 125,623,494
Existing Impervious Acres (2)
6,044
Existing Cost per Impervious Acre $ 20,784.83
Notes:
1 2
of w ay acres.

Ex isting Facilities v alues deriv ed from City Engineer cost estimate of replacement v alue of ex isting facilities.

Ex isting acres in City identified in the Master Drainage Study Update (2023). Ex cludes park/open space and right Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 46 December 2024 City of Santee
Fee Summary
The Drainage Fee is distributed across the various land uses by multiplying by the impervious factor assumptions to calculate a fee per acre, which is then divided by residential unit density and non-residential floor area ratio assumptions to calculate the fee per unit. This fee per unit is then divided by the average unit assumption for Single Family and Multi-Family to reach a fee per square foot for residential land uses and a fee per 1,000 square feet for non-residential land uses (as shown in Table 7-3).

Table 7-3: Drainage Fee Summary
Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections
Table 7-4 summarizes the anticipated future facilities needed for new development.

Land Use
Impervious
Factor (1)
Cost per
Impervious Acre Fee per Acre
Residential
Unit Density
/ FAR (2) Fee per Unit
Average Unit
Size (SF) / FAR
Conversion (3) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family (4) 26% 20,784.83 $ 5,404.06 $ 7.00 772.01 $ 2,200 0.35 $ Multi Family (5) 73% 20,784.83 $ 15,172.93 $ 22.00 689.68 $ 1,600 0.43 $ Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF)
Commercial 85% 20,784.83 $ 17,667.11 $ 0.24 10.45 1,689.92 $ Office 90% 20,784.83 $ 18,706.35 $ 0.68 29.62 631.53 $
Industrial 95% 20,784.83 $ 19,745.59 $ 0.35 15.25 1,295.13 $ Notes:
1 2
3 Av erage unit size based on planned new dev elopment in the City of Santee. Floor Area Ratios used to conv ert EDU per Acre to per KSF: Commercial (0.24), Office (0.68), and Industrial (0.35). 4 5
Imperv ious Factor identified in the Master Drainage Study Update (2023) Table 3-3. The imperv ious factor represents an estimate of the percentage of surface area that w ill generate storm w ater run-off.

Residential Unit Density assumes the median of the land use zones included in the Single Family and Multi-Family groupings. Floor Area Ratio based off City prov ided Impact Fee Unit Assessments Spreadsheet.

Single Family includes HL, R1, R1-A, R2, and R7 land use data from the Master Drainage Study Update (2023). Imperv ious Factor takes the av erage and Residential Density takes the median of these land use zones.

Multi Family includes R14 and R22 land use data from the Master Drainage Study Update (2023). Imperv ious Factor takes the av erage and Residential Density takes the median of these land use zones.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 47 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 7-4: Anticipated Future Drainage Projects
Table 7-5 summarizes the anticipated Drainage Fee revenue that will be utilized to fund the construction and/or expansion of drainage facilities that will serve new development.

Table 7-5: Drainage Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout
Nexus Requirement Summary
The Drainage Fee component of this DIF Study meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.

Project ID Project Name
Construction
Cost
Construction
Contingency
Subtotal
Construction
Design/
Permitting
Project
Total Cost
Project 1A Las Colinas Channel Culvert and Upsizing $ 710,000 2,340,000 $ 3,050,000 $ 1,220,000 $ 4,270,000 $ Project 1B Cottonwood Ave to Mission Gorge Storm Drain Upsize $ 130,000 430,000 $ 560,000 $ 230,000 $ 790,000 $ Project 1C Mission Gorge Culvert Project $ 260,000 840,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 440,000 $ 1,540,000 $ Project 2 Buena Vista Channel Upsizing $ 570,000 1,870,000 $ 2,440,000 $ 980,000 $ 3,420,000 $ Project 3.1A Cottonwood Ave - Las Brisas Dr to Mission Gorge Rd Storm Drain Upsize 340,000 $ 110,000 $ 450,000 $ 180,000 $ 630,000 $ Project 3.1B Cottonwood Ave - Happy Ln and Mission Gorge Rd Storm Drain Improvements 140,000 $ 50,000 $ 190,000 $ 80,000 $ 270,000 $ Project 3.2 Cottonwood Ave - El Toro Ln and Buena Vista Ave Storm Drain $ 70,000 220,000 $ 290,000 $ 120,000 $ 410,000 $ Project 3.3 Cottonwood Ave - Prospect Ave and Hwy 52 Storm Drain $ 90,000 280,000 $ 370,000 $ 150,000 $ 520,000 $ Project 4.1 South Mission Gorge Rd - Olive Ln and Forester Creek Storm Drain Upsize and Extension 1,380, $ 420,000 000 $ 1,800,000 $ 720,000 $ 2,520,000 $ Project 4.2 North Mission Gorge Rd - Town Center Pkwy and Carlton Hills Storm Drain Extension 200,000 $ 60,000 $ 260,000 $ 110,000 $ 370,000 $ Project 5.1 Shadow Hill Rd and Woodside Ave Drainage Improvements $ 440,000 1,440,000 $ 1,880,000 $ 760,000 $ 2,640,000 $ Project 5.2 Northcote Rd and Woodside Ave Drainage Improvements $ 730,000 2,420,000 $ 3,150,000 $ 1,260,000 $ 4,410,000 $ Project 6 Pepper Dr and Graves Ave Drainage Improvements $ 160,000 530,000 $ 690,000 $ 280,000 $ 970,000 $ Project 7 Prospect Ave to San Diego River Storm Drain $ 430,000 1,420,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 740,000 $ 2,590,000 $ Total Facilities 4,230,000 13,850,000 18,080,000 7,270,000 25,350,000 Source:

City of Santee Master Drainage Study Update, prepared by Rick Engineering Company (July 20, 2023).

Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
SF
Assumptions
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (units)
Single Family 0.35 $ 1,444 2,200 1,111,880 $
Multi Family 0.43 $ 4,466 1,600 3,072,608 $
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Commercial 1,689.92 $ 1020.34 1,724,293 $
Office 631.53 $ 83.92 52,998 $
Industrial 1,295.13 $ 1266.30 1,640,023 $
Total $ 7,601,802
Notes:
1 The proposed fee does not include the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 48 December 2024 City of Santee
Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.

The purpose of the Drainage Fee is to fund the Drainage Facilities needs generated by new development in the City, such as new or expanded drainage facilities in the City. Each new resident and worker create additional impervious acres which creates a demand for additional drainage facilities. In order to accommodate these needs, new drainage facilities will be built and/or existing facilities will be expanded.

Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.

The Drainage Fee will be used to fund new drainage facilities in order to maintain the City’s existing level of service. The anticipated new facilities are show on Table 7-4 and the associated fee revenue at Buildout is shown on Table 7-5, which will be used to fund new or expanded drainage facilities.

Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

The fee will be used to fund new drainage facilities that are necessary to serve the increased impervious acres in the City. New development generates additional impervious acres which increases the demand for drainage facilities. The existing inventory method uses a facility standard based on the ratio of existing facilities to the existing service population on a cost per unit or cost per square foot basis. Under this approach, new development funds the construction of new facilities or the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development.

By definition, the existing inventory method ensures that no facility deficiencies are spread to future development.

Table 7-1 identifies the existing drainage facilities and Table 7-2 calculates the existing cost per impervious acre. The cost per impervious acre is then allocated to each development type based on the impervious factor. The cost per acre is then multiplied by the residential density (dwelling units per acre) and the non-residential floor area ratio for a fee per unit for residential and per 1,000 square feet for non-residential. Finally, the estimated persons per household and employees per 1,000 square feet is applied to the fee. Table 7-3 calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size and cost per 1,000 square feet for nonresidential. Calculating the fees based on the anticipated impervious acres ensures a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development planned to be built.

Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

Each new development is anticipated to generate additional impervious acres that require drainage facilities. The addition of new residents and workers creates the need for new or expanded drainage facilities to maintain the City’s existing level of service. The Drainage Fee is based on the Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 49 December 2024 City of Santee
additional impervious acres created by the new development and the impervious factor for each land use. This ensures that the need for the facilities is directly related to a particular development’s impact.

As new development is constructed, new or expanded drainage facilities are needed to meet the City’s existing level of service for drainage facilities. The fee is based on the Existing Inventory Method.

The existing level of service is calculated by taking the total drainage facilities cost and dividing it by the existing impervious acres to derive the existing level of service cost per impervious acre as shown in Table 7-2. The fee for each land use is then calculated by multiplying the cost per impervious acre by the impervious factor assumptions to calculate a fee per acre, which is then divided by residential unit density and non-residential floor area ratio assumptions to calculate the fee per unit. This fee per unit is then divided by the average unit assumption for Single Family and Multi-Family to reach a fee per square foot for residential land uses and a fee per 1,000 square feet for non-residential land uses as shown in Table 7-3. Since the need for the facilities directly correlates to the addition of new residents and workers, determining the fee based on the projected equivalent residents for each land use ensures that new development pays for their fair share of the required future facilities.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 50 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 8 Parks-in-Lieu Fee
Background
Parkland acquisition under the Quimby Act allows for developers to either dedicate land to satisfy their parkland requirement or pay an in-lieu fee. Parks-in-lieu fees are not charged on nonresidential land uses.

Residential development in the City will pay the Parks-in-Lieu Fee at building permit issuance.

The park cost was estimated based on the existing City adopted standard of five (5) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Parkland acquisition under the Quimby Act requires developers to either dedicate land to satisfy their parkland requirement or pay an in-lieu fee. The in-lieu fee is dependent upon appraised land cost and thus, the amount should be agreed upon between the City and the developer when the land dedication is triggered. The City has an existing Quimby in-lieu fee (also known as a Park In-Lieu Fee). As noted in the General Plan, Park In-Lieu Fees stem from the Quimby Act. Quimby provides for the dedication of land for parks, or in certain instances (i.e. a subdivision is small), a fee in-lieu of dedicating land is provided. It is important to note that for the Park In-Lieu Fee, infill projects are exempt, and the fee applies primarily to parkland and land improvements in new neighborhoods.

Parkland
AB1191, also known as the Quimby Act, was established by the California State Legislature in 1965 and codified as California Government Code Section 66477. The Quimby Act outlines the requirements for imposing fees or land dedication for park purposes with a minimum of three (3) acres and a maximum of five (5) acres of green space per 1,000 residents. The Quimby Act allows the legislative body of a city or county, by ordinance, to require the dedication of land or impose a requirement of the payment of fees in-lieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition to the approval of a tentative tract map or parcel map.

Currently, per the City’s municipal code 12.40.060, the applicant for any development must, as a condition of approval of the development, dedicate land, pay fees in lieu of land, or a combination of both, pursuant to that chapter for the purpose of providing park or recreation facilities to serve future residents of such development. As stated in municipal code 12.40.070, the City imposes the in-lieu fee a Parks Land Dedication based on five (5) acres per 1,000 residents or the payment of the in-lieu fee. The amount of a fee in lieu of land to be paid pursuant to this municipal code chapter is set by resolution of the City Council and is based on the City-wide average of land available for park purposes within the urbanized area of the City, plus the estimated cost for developing said land into usable parks. The fee is automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year. The inflation adjustment is two percent or based on the previous calendar year's increase in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (CPI-U: All Items) as published by the Bureau of Labor Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 51 December 2024 City of Santee
Statistics, whichever is higher. The fees received under this chapter are deposited in the park in lieu fund and must be used for the purchase, development and/or rehabilitation of park and recreational facilities.

Service Population
The Parks-in-Lieu Fee is not applied to non-residential development because workers typically do not use parkland.

Current Level of Service
Per data provide by the City, the City has a total of 315.14 acres of developed parkland as shown in Table 8-1.Based on a population of approximately 58,086, there are 5.43 acres of existing parkland per 1,000 persons/residents as shown in Table 8-2. Thus, the current parkland is more than the standard of 5 acres per 1,000 people on a citywide level.

Table 8-1: Parkland Inventory List
Facility Address Acres
Parks
Big Rock Park 8125 Arlette St. 5.00
Deputy Ken Collier Park 9206 Via De Cristina 0.51
Mast Park 9125 Carlton Hills Blvd. 61.16
Mast Park West Trail 9200 Carlton Hiulls Blvd. 43.26
Shadow Hill Park 9161 Shadow Hill Rd. 5.69
Sky Ranch Park 5850 Cala Lily St. 1.36
Town Center Park - East 550 Park Center Dr. 55.00
Town Center Park - West 9545 Cuyamaca St. 10.20
Walker Preserve 9500 Magnolia Ave 105.08
West Hills Park 8790 Mast Blvd. 8.41
Woodglen Vista Park 10250 Woodglen Vista Dr. 15.00
Weston Park 9050 Trailmark Way 4.47
Total Facilities 315.14
Source:

Park data prov ided by the City of Santee.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 52 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 8-2: Existing Level of Service per Resident
Planned Level of Service
AB1191, also known as the Quimby Act, was established by the California State Legislature in 1965 and codified as California Government Code Section 66477. The Quimby Act outlines the requirements for imposing fees or dedicating land for park purposes with a minimum of three (3) acres and a maximum of five (5) acres of green space per 1,000 residents. The Quimby Act authorized cities to require dedication of land or impose a requirement of the payment of fees inlieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park and recreational purposes as a condition of approval of a tentative map or parcel map. Per the City’s municipal code section 12.40.060, except as otherwise provided in that section, only the payment of fees is required for developments containing 50 or fewer parcels, except that when a condominium project, stock cooperative, or community apartment project, as those terms are defined in Sections 4105, 4125, and 4190 of the Civil Code, exceed 50 dwelling units, dedication of land may be required, even though the number of parcels may be less than 50. An applicant for a development containing 50 or fewer parcels may offer to dedicate land in lieu of paying fees, in which event the City Council may elect to accept the land or require the payment of fees, or a combination of both, and in making such election will consider the factors set forth in this section,

1. For developments containing more than 50 parcels, the City Council determines whether to require dedication of land, payment of a fee in lieu of land, or a combination of both, for developments containing more than 50 parcels. In making this determination, the City Council considers the following factors:

2. Conformity of lands offered for dedication with the recreation element of the General Plan;

3. The topography, soils, soil stability, drainage, access, location and general utility of land in the development available for dedication;

4. The size and shape of the development and land available for dedication; Description Acres
Existing Parkland (1)
Park Acreages 315.14
Existing Service Population (2)
58,086
Total Existing Level of Service per Resident 5.43
Notes:
1 2
Ex isting parkland data from the City of Santee.

Ex isting Serv ice population comprises of just residents and does not factor in non-residential.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 53 December 2024 City of Santee

5. The amount, usability, and location of publicly owned property available for combination with dedicated lands in the formation of local park and recreation facilities;

6. The recreation facilities to be privately owned and maintained by future residents of the development.

Fee Credits
Credit for Private Parks:

As stated in the City’s municipal code section 12.40.100, where a development provides a private area for park and recreational purposes and such area is to be privately owned and maintained by the future owner(s) of the development, such area may be credited against up to 50% of the requirement of land dedication or fees payment, if the Director determines that it is in the public interest to do so, and that all of the following standards either have been or will be met prior to approval of the final subdivision map:

A. That yards, court areas, setbacks, and other open areas, required to be maintained by the zoning and building ordinances and other regulations, will not be included in the computation of such private areas;
B. That the private ownership and maintenance of the area will be adequately provided for by recorded written agreement, covenants or restrictions;
C. That the use of the private area is restricted for park and recreational purposes by an open space easement or other instrument approved by the City Attorney; D. That the proposed private area is reasonably adaptable for use for park or recreational purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, access, and location;
E. That the facilities proposed:

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 54 December 2024 City of Santee

1. Are in substantial accordance with the provisions of the recreation element of the General Plan, or adopted community or specific plans,

2. Are appropriate to the recreation needs of the future residents of the development, and

3. Will substitute for the park lands otherwise required to be dedicated in meeting the recreation needs of the residents.

Credit for Public Parks:

As stated in the City’s municipal code section 12.40.120, when an applicant has dedicated a park to the public to serve a subdivision for which a tentative map was filed, the City Council may, pursuant to Sections 12.40.060 and 12.40.070, allow the following credits for such park:

A. A credit against up to 100% of the requirement for land dedication; B. A credit against up to 100% of fee payment required by this chapter for building permits to construct dwellings on the subdivision lots served by the dedicated public park; or C. A credit against fees required for such building permits for the value of improvements to such park installed or constructed by the applicant; provided that such credit must not exceed the value of improvements normally authorized by the City for similar parks.

Fee Methodology
Table 8-3 shows the parkland cost per resident. Based on data from CoStar, completed in August 2023, the estimated cost per acre for parkland acquisition is approximately $1.0 million.

Table 8-3: Parkland Cost per Resident
Fee Summary
Currently, per the City’s municipal code 12.40.060, the applicant for any development must, as a condition of approval of the development, dedicate land, pay fees in lieu of land, or a combination of both, pursuant to this chapter for the purpose of providing park or recreation facilities to serve Park In-Lieu
Park Land Cost per Acre (1) $ 1,000,000
Required Acres/1,000 Residents 5.0
Land Acquisition Cost per Resident 5,000.00 $
Notes:
1 Land cost derived from median of CoStar Sale Comps Map & List Report (08/24/2023) provided by the City, rounded to $1,000,000.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 55 December 2024 City of Santee
future residents of such development. As stated in municipal code 12.40.070, the City imposes the in-lieu fee based on five (5) acres per 1,000 residents or the payment of the in-lieu fee. The Parksin-Lieu Fee per unit is calculated by multiplying the cost per resident by the average number of residents per unit type (density). The fee per unit must then be converted to a fee per square foot (SF) by taking the total fee per unit and dividing by the estimated average unit size for each land use to arrive at the fee per square foot. These calculations are shown in Table 8-4.

Table 8-4: Parks-in-Lieu Fee Cost Summary
Note that applicants can either dedicate land, pay fees in lieu of land, or a combination of both.

Nexus Requirement Summary
The Parks-in-Lieu Fee meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.

Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.

The purpose of the Parks-in-Lieu Fee is to fund the parkland needs generated by new development in the City. Each new resident creates a demand for parkland. The Quimby standard for the City is five (5) acres of parkland for each 1,000 residents. In order to accommodate these needs, new parkland will be dedicated, an in-lieu fee will be paid for parkland acquisition, or a combination of both. Table 8-3 calculates the parkland cost per resident based on the City’s Quimby standard for parks and the estimated land acquisition cost.

Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.

The Parks-in-Lieu Fee will be used to fund new parkland based on the Quimby standard. New parkland will be dedicated, an in-lieu fee will be paid for parkland acquisition, or a combination of both.

Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

The fee will be used to fund new neighborhood, mini and community parks that are necessary to serve the increased residents in the City. New residential development generates additional residents which increases the demand for parkland. The Parks-in-Lieu Fee is calculated using the Land Use Cost Per Resident Density Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family 5,000 $ 2.93 14,650.00 $ 2,200 6.66 $
Multi Family 5,000 $ 2.37 11,850.00 $ 1,600 7.41 $
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 56 December 2024 City of Santee
Quimby standard of five (5) acres of park per 1,000 residents. Residential development is responsible for paying its fair share to meet the Quimby requirements. Non-residential uses do not pay the fee since they do not generate additional residents and workers have minimal impact on the City’s park system.

Table 8-3 calculates the cost per resident. Table 8-4 then allocates the cost to each development type based on the estimated persons per household and calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size. By basing the fee on the size of the unit and the estimated number of new residents that is anticipated to be generated by the addition of that square footage, the fee is directly correlated to the increased need for new parks.

Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

Each new residential development is anticipated to generate new residents. The addition of new residents creates the need for new parkland to meet the City’s Quimby requirement of five (5) acres per 1,000 residents. The fee is directly correlated to the number of new residents expected to be generated by each type of development. Non-residential development does not pay for parks as non-residential developments do not generate a significant demand for parkland. Residential development pays its fair share based on the estimated persons the new unit is expected to generate.

As new residential units are constructed, new parks are necessary to meet the City’s Quimby requirement of five (5) acres of park per 1,000 residents. The Parks-in-Lieu Fee is calculated by taking the cost per acre of park acquisition times five (5) acres of parks per 1,000 future residents to determine the cost per resident, as shown in Table 8-3. The cost per resident is then allocated to each residential land use based on the persons per household each unit is expected to generate and divided by the average unit size in square feet to determine the fee per square foot as shown in Table 8-4. Since the need for parkland is based on the number of new residents, calculating the fee based on the number of persons each unit is expected to generate and converting to a fee per square feet, ensures that each new residential unit is paying only its fair share of the required facilities.

By determining the fee based on the estimated new residents that would be generated by new development, each new residential unit is paying only its fair share of the parkland required to meet the City’s Quimby requirement. In order to accommodate these needs, new parkland will be dedicated, an in-lieu fee will be paid for parkland acquisition, or a combination of both. Nonresidential land uses are not assessed a Parks-in-Lieu Fee as non-residential development will not generate an increase in parkland demand.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 57 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 9 Fire Facilities Fee
Background
The Fire Facilities Fee is a new proposed DIF that will be used to help fund the construction of new fire stations and the procurement of apparatus to serve the City. The Fire Facilities Fee is calculated using the System Plan Method. The System Plan Method utilizes an integrated approach to allocate the cost of existing facilities and the costs of planned facilities to the total development in the study area. An inventory of existing fire facilities and equipment was provided by the City using facility information and valuation based upon Property Insurance valuation.

Service Population
Demand for fire facilities is based on the total new residents and employees generated at Buildout conditions.

Cost Summary
The Fire Facilities Fee will fund the construction of new fire stations and apparatus to serve the City. These facilities will be necessary to meet the demands of the growth of the City at Buildout.

The cost for the Fire Facilities Fee is based on the integrated cost of the current and future facilities.

As new development occurs, there are new residents and employees associated with the new development, which correlates to a need for additional fire improvements. The Nexus Study acknowledges that the existing development will also benefit from these fire improvements once they are constructed and therefore existing development has a fair share of these improvements.

New development also benefits from the existing fire facilities and therefore new development will fund the integrated system of facilities at the existing standard attributable to new development.

Table 9-1 shows the City’s current fire inventory of fire stations, vehicles and equipment that serve the City.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 58 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 9-1: Fire Facilities Inventory List
Facility Description 1 SF Cost
Fire Stations (1)
Fire Station 4 8950 Cottonwood Ave. 15,185 - $
Fire Station 5 9130 Carlton Oaks Drive 8,118 - $
Subtotal Fire Stations $ -
Fire Apparatus
Engine 5 Type I $ 559,899.00
Engine 205 Type I $ 650,000.00
Engine 4 Type I $ 604,402.97
Engine 6128 Type I $ 345,000.00
Engine (New Order) Type I $ 1,020,779.97
Brush 4 Type III $ 371,036.91
Truck 4 Aerial $ 1,080,907.28
Reserve Engine Type I $ 650,000.00
Reserve Engine Type I $ 650,000.00
Medic 4 Ford Ambulance $ 254,865.01
Medic 5 Ford Ambulance $ 211,501.46
BLS 4 Ford Ambulance $ 153,700.00
Reserve Ambulance Ford Ambulance $ 170,050.71
Reserve Ambulance Ford Ambulance $ 160,068.34
Reserve Ambulance Ford Ambulance $ 172,661.16
Patrol 4 Type 6 $ 280,000.00
Subtotal Fire Apparatus $ 7,334,872.81
Support Vehicles
Carson Trailer REMS Trailer $ 19,200.00
Ford F-150 Squad $ 39,123.47
Ford F-150 Battalion 2 $ 79,058.89
Ford F-150 Battalion 2 $ 39,123.47
Ford F-250 Mechanic $ 51,280.00
Ford F-350 Tow Vehicle $ 69,000.00
Ford Explorer Fire Chief $ 36,143.85
Ford Explorer Fire Marshal $ 30,618.41
Ford Explorer 4204 30,618.41 $
Ford Escape Hybrid Pool Car $ 27,746.00
Chevy Tahoe 4202 113,000.00 $
Polaris $ 26,934.70
Subtotal Support Vehicles $ 561,847.20
Equipment (outfitting engines, trucks, ambulance, vehicles) Type 1 Engine Equipment Cost 5.00 $820,850.00
Type 3 Engine Equipment Cost 1.00 $133,014.00
Type 6 Engine Equipment Cost 1.00 $151,304.00
Truck 4 Equipment Cost 1.00 $313,016.00
Ambulance Equipment Cost 6.00 $897,396.00
Battalion 2 Equipment Cost 2.00 $109,336.00
Squad Equipment Cost 1.00 $124,128.00
Polaris Equipment Cost 1.00 $9,000.00
Fire Chief/Deputy Chief Vehicles Equipment Cost 3.00 $149,000.00 PPE Equipment Cost 112.00 $544,800.00
Tow Vehicle Equipment Cost 1.00 $32,520.00
Subtotal Equipment $ 3,284,364.00
Total Facilities (Rounded) $ 11,181,084
Notes:
1 Fire Facilities identified in the Santee Fire Department Community Risk Assessment Long-Range Master Plan (March 2023) Ex isting cost not included as facilities w ill be rebuilt and ex panded. Fleet maintenance facility is included in the future facilities as w ell. 2 Fire Station Cost is based on appraised insurance v alue (2017) prov ided by the City (09/05/23). 3 Fire equipment cost prov ided by the Santee Fire Department (3/18/2024).

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 59 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 9-2 shows the City’s planned fire stations, vehicles and equipment that serve the City.

Table 9-2: Fire Facilities Planned Facilities
Facility Description SF/Number Cost
Fire Stations/Facilities
Fire Station 4 Rebuild 18,000 $25,200,000.00
Fire Station 5 Replacement 10,000 $14,000,000.00
Fire Station 20 Construction(1) 13,000 $21,000,000.00
Fire Station 28 Construction(1) 10,000 $16,000,000.00
Fleet Maintenance Facility 4,141 $5,797,400.00
Subtotal Fire Stations/Facilities $81,997,400.00
Fire Apparatus
Engine 5 Type I $1,200,000.00
Engine 205 Type I $1,200,000.00
Engine 4 Type I $1,200,000.00
Engine 6128 Type I $0.00
Brush 4 Type III $690,000.00
Truck 4 Aerial $2,060,000.00
Patrol 4 Type 6 $300,000.00
Reserve Engine Type I $1,200,000.00
Reserve Engine Type I $1,200,000.00
Medic 4 Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Medic 5 Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Remount Ambulance Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Remount Ambulance Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Remount Ambulance Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Remount Ambulance Ford Ambulance $340,000.00
Subtotal Fire Apparatus $11,090,000.00
Support Vehicles
Carson Trailer REMS Trailer $16,000.00
Ford F-350 Squad $100,000.00
Ford F-150 Battalion 2 $80,000.00
Ford F-150 Battalion 2 $80,000.00
Ford F-250 Mechanic $80,000.00
Ford Explorer Deputy Chief $57,000.00
Ford Explorer Fire Marshal $57,000.00
Chevy Tahoe 4202 $98,000.00
Ford Escape Hybrid Pool Car $19,000.00
Polaris REMS Unit $24,000.00
Subtotal Support Vehicles $611,000.00
Equipment (outfitting engines, trucks, ambulance, vehicles) Type 1 Engine Equipment Cost 5.00 $820,850.00
Type 3 Engine Equipment Cost 1.00 $133,014.00
Type 6 Engine Equipment Cost 1.00 $151,304.00
Truck 4 Equipment Cost 1.00 $313,016.00
Ambulance Equipment Cost 6.00 $897,396.00
Battalion 2 Equipment Cost 2.00 $109,336.00
Squad Equipment Cost 1.00 $124,128.00
Polaris Equipment Cost 1.00 $9,000.00
Fire Chief/Deputy Chief Vehicles Equipment Cost 2.00 $99,332.00 PPE Equipment Cost 112.00 $544,800.00
Subtotal Equipment $3,202,176.00
Total Facilities (Rounded) $96,900,576.00
Notes:
1 Based on the construction cost of $21,000,000 for Station 20 based upon the figures the City receiv ed from their designer.

Source: Santee Fire Department (3/18/2024).

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 60 December 2024 City of Santee
Fee Methodology
The Fire Facilities Fee uses the System Plan Method to calculate the fee. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, the System Plan Method utilizes an integrated approach to allocate the cost of existing facilities and the costs of planned facilities to the total development in the study area. This method is appropriate when calculating a systemwide fee in which new development will fund an integrated system of facilities at the future standard attributable to new development. By spreading the costs of an integrated system incorporating the existing facilities and planned facilities costs to the total development in the study area, this ensures that new development only pays their proportional share of the total system costs and is not responsible for rectifying any existing deficiencies.

The total fire facilities value is divided by the existing service population to establish the level of service per resident/worker as shown in Table 9-3.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 61 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 9-3: Fire Facilities Level of Service per Capita
Fee Summary
The Fire Facility Fee per unit is calculated by multiplying the cost per capita by the average number of resident equivalents per unit type (density). The cost per capita for non-residential land uses is weighted using the factors shown in Table 3-4. For residential uses, the fee per unit must then be converted to a fee per square foot for each unit type by dividing by the average size of each unit.

Table 9-4 summarizes these calculations.

Description Value
Existing Facilities (1)
Fire Stations (2) $ -
Fire Apparatus $ 7,334,873
Support Vehicles $ 561,847
Equipment (outfitting engines, trucks, ambulance, vehicles) 3,284,364 $ Subtotal Facilities $ 11,181,084
Existing Fund Balance n/a
Total Existing Costs $ 11,181,084
New Facilities (3)
Fire Stations/Facilities $ 81,997,400
Fire Apparatus $ 11,090,000
Support Vehicles $ 611,000
Equipment (outfitting engines, trucks, ambulance, vehicles) 3,202,176 $ Subtotal Facilities $ 96,900,576
Total Future Costs $ 96,900,576
Total Fire Costs $ 108,081,660
Total Buildout Service Population 82,028
Total Cost per Resident $ 1,317.62
Total Cost Service per Worker $ 487.52
Notes:
1 2
3 Fire Facilities identified in the Santee Fire Department Community Risk Assessment Long-Range Master Plan (March 2023).

Santee Fire Department (3/18/2024).

Ex isting cost not included as facilities w ill be rebuilt and ex panded. Fleet maintenance facility is included in the future facilities as w ell.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 62 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 9-4: Fire Facilities Fee Summary
Current Level of Service
Per AB602, when applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for the fire facilities, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. As shown on Table 9-5, the proposed Fire Facilities Fee is less than the existing level of service.

The Fire Facility Fee includes the facilities that are needed to serve the City at buildout and calculates the percentage attributable to new development based on new developments’ proportional share of the new facilities. The percentage attributable to new development is then applied to the costs of the facilities. This methodology conservatively ensures that new development is only funding their proportionate share of the total facilities. As shown in the Nexus Study analysis, based on the cost per capita of the existing facilities, the level of service per capita for existing facilities is lower than the level of service planned for build out. This analysis is based on existing and planned facilities and new developments’ proportional fair share of these planned facilities; therefore, this Nexus Study makes the required nexus findings per AB 602.

Government Code section 66001(g) states, "A fee shall not include the costs attributable to existing deficiencies in public facilities, but may include the costs attributable to the increased demand for public facilities reasonably related to the development project in order to (1) refurbish existing facilities to maintain the existing level of service, or (2) achieve an adopted level of service that is consistent with the general plan." The CIP, shown in Appendix A, will adopt the new level of service. Furthermore, as shown in Table 9-3, the new level of service is the same for both existing residents and new development. The City is not requiring new development to build out at a higher level of service than what is being placed on existing residents at buildout. Rather, the planned level of service, reflected in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan for the Fire Facilities Fee, will provide the higher, adopted level of service for both existing residents and future development to be funded by both existing residents and future development. Moreover, the use of a new, increased Land Use
Cost Per Resident /
Worker Density Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family 1,317.62 $ 2.93 3,860.63 $ 2,200 1.75 $
Multi Family 1,317.62 $ 2.37 3,122.76 $ 1,600 1.95 $
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF)
Commercial 487.52 $ 1.82 887.29 $
Office 487.52 $ 4.00 1,950.08 $
Industrial 487.52 $ 0.40 195.01 $
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 63 December 2024 City of Santee
level of service is appropriate where, as here, the existing level of service is too low to meet the City’s desired standards and future facility needs.

As residents and employees occupying future development projects become existing residents, they will generate general fund revenues for the City through the payment of property and sales taxes. These general fund revenues can be used for general government purposes throughout the City, including the operation and maintenance of fire and other public facilities and the provision of ongoing government services to the existing population. While the City has the discretion to use general fund revenues to fund the existing population’s fair share costs of future general governmental facilities, these revenues may also be used for any other legal general government service. In contrast, the Fire Facilities fee revenues may only be used to pay for the costs of fire facilities related to new development.

Table 9-5: Fire Facilities Existing Level of Service
Capital Improvements and Revenue Projections
Table 9-7 summarizes the anticipated Fire Facilities Fees. The revenue will be applied to future fire stations and fire equipment to meet the needs of new development. According to discussions with the Fire Chief, the current fire stations are at full capacity and cannot accommodate any additional expansion to meet additional demand. At full Buildout, an additional two fire stations will be needed. The two additional fire stations will also require fire apparatuses, ambulances, and other equipment. Those costs are also shown on Table 9-2. Furthermore, the current stations will Description Value
Existing Facilities (1)
Fire Stations (1) $ 7,790,819
Fire Apparatus $ 7,334,873
Support Vehicles $ 561,847
Equipment (outfitting engines, trucks, ambulance, vehicles) 3,284,364 $ Subtotal Facilities $ 18,971,903
Soft Costs (2) $ 3,116,328
Total Costs $ 22,088,231
Existing Service Population 66,214
Total Existing Level of Service per Resident $ 333.59
Total Existing Level of Service per Worker $ 123.43
Notes:
1 Fire station cost included here to show total ex isting lev el of serv ice. 2 Fire Facilities identified in the Santee Fire Department Community Risk Assessment Long-Range Master Plan (March 2023).

Soft Costs include 10% - Construction Contingency , 15% - Design and Env ironmental, and 15% - Construction Admin/Inspection. These are applied only to the Fire Stations costs (CIP Structures).

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 64 December 2024 City of Santee
need to be rebuilt/replaced. Finally, the fleet maintenance facility will need to be rebuilt as well.

Table 9-6 shows the construction costs for these facilities are shown below:

Table 9-6: Costs of Future Fire Facilities
Table 9-7 shows the anticipated fee revenue at Buildout.

Table 9-7: Anticipated Fire Facilities Estimated Revenue at Buildout Nexus Requirement Summary
The Fire Facilities Fee component of this DIF Study meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.

Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.

The purpose of the Fire Facilities Fee is to fund new development’s fair-share portion of new fire facilities, such as new fire stations, vehicles and fire equipment required for the additional fire Facility SF/Number Cost
Fire Stations/Facilities
Fire Station 4 Rebuild 18,000 $25,200,000.00
Fire Station 5 Replacement 10,000 $14,000,000.00
Fire Station 20 Construction 13,000 $21,000,000.00
Fire Station 28 Construction 10,000 $16,000,000.00
Fleet Maintenance Facility 4,141 $5,797,400.00
Subtotal Fire Stations/Facilities $81,997,400.00
Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
(units)
Average Unit
Size (SF)
Anticipated
Growth
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (Total SF)
Single Family 1.75 $ 1,444 2,200 3,176,800 5,559,400.00 $ Multi Family 1.95 $ 4,466 1,600 7,145,600 13,933,920.00 $ Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Commercial 887.29 $ 1,020.34 $ 905,337.48
Office 1,950.08 $ 83.92 $ 163,650.71
Industrial 195.01 $ 1,266.30 $ 246,941.16
Total $ 20,809,249.36
Notes:
1 The proposed fee does not include the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 65 December 2024 City of Santee
personnel that are necessary to mitigate the impacts of new development. Each new resident and worker creates a demand for additional fire facilities. In order to accommodate these needs, new fire facilities will be built and/or existing facilities will be expanded per capita/worker.

Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.

The Fire Facilities Fee will be used to fund new development’s fair-share portion of the fire facilities, new fire stations, vehicles and fire equipment required to serve new development in order to maintain the City’s existing level of service. The anticipated fee revenue at Buildout is shown on Table 9-7. The capital improvement projects are identified in Appendix A.

Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

The fee will be used to fund new fire facilities that are necessary to serve the increased residents and workers in the City. New development generates additional residents and workers which increases the demand for fire facilities. The System Plan Method calculates the proposed fee utilizing the totality of the existing and proposed improvements and subsequently dividing by the service population, future development funds an integrated system of facilities at the future standard applicable to new development. As the System Plan Method spreads the totality of fire facilities improvements based on the total demand at the horizon year, existing deficiencies are by definition not being spread to future development.

Table 9-1 identifies the existing fire facilities, Table 9-2 shows the future fire facilities, and Table 9-3 calculates the existing cost per capita/worker. Workers are weighted less than residents to reflect lower per capita service demand. Non-residential buildings are typically occupied less than dwelling units, so it is reasonable to assume that average per-worker demand for services is less than average per-resident demand. The 0.37-weighting factor for workers is based upon a 45-hour work week (40 hours of work plus 1 hour lunch break) relative to a resident’s non-working time of 123 hours (168 hours per week less 45 work hours).

The cost per capita/worker is then allocated to each development type based on the estimated persons per household and employees per 1,000 square feet. Table 9-4 calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size and cost per 1,000 square feet for non-residential. Calculating the fees based on the new residents or employees generated ensures a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development project.

Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

Each new development is anticipated to generate new residents and workers. The addition of new residents and workers creates the need for new fire facilities to maintain the City’s existing level Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 66 December 2024 City of Santee
of service. The Fire Facilities Fee is based on the number of applicable workers and/or residents each new development is expected to generate, thus ensuring that the need for the facilities is directly related to a particular development’s impact. New workers generate a smaller demand than a resident, thus one worker is considered, on average, as equivalent to 0.37 that of a resident.

The fee for each unit type is calculated in Table 9-4.

The Fire Facilities fee is based on the System Plan Method, which estimates the costs for an integrated system of existing and future facilities. The fire facilities that are necessary for the new development are summarized in the planned improvements presented in Table 9-2. The existing facilities are shown on Table 9-1. Table 9-3 calculates the total cost per capita based on the total planned and existing cost divided by the Buildout population. The fee for each land use is then calculated by multiplying the cost per capita/worker by the projected number of new resident equivalents that each land use will generate and converting to a fee per square foot for residential and a fee per 1,000 square foot for non-residential land uses as shown in Table 9-4. Since the need for the facilities directly correlates to the addition of new residents and workers, determining the fee based on the equivalent residents each land use is expected to generate ensures that each new development pays for their fair share of the required future facilities.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 67 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 10 Long Range Planning Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the new proposed Long Range Planning Fee. The Long Range Planning Fee is a new proposed fee and will be collected for the purpose of contributing to fund updates to the City’s General Plan Elements and Sustainable Santee Plan. The General Plan is made up of multiple elements that are updated periodically to account for changes in the City over time. The State of California requires that among these elements be included: Land Use, Conservation, Noise, Environmental Justice, Circulation, Open Space, Safety, Air Quality, and Housing. The City of Santee combines the Safety and Environmental Justice elements and additionally includes a Recreation element.

The City most recently completed an update to the Housing Element in 2022. The next upcoming scheduled update is the Land Use Element, which will be completed in 2024.

Current Level of Service
Table 10-1 describes the planned components of the General Plan update and the Sustainable Santee Plan and their associated costs. Table 10-2 calculates new developments fair share of the cost based on the population allocation between existing and new service population.

Table 10-1: Long Range Planning Elements Cost
Long Range Planning Documents Last Updated
Scheduled
Next Update Cost
General Plan Elements (1)
Land Use (2) 2003 2024 680,000 $
Housing (3) 2022 2028 300,000 $
Mobility (3) 2017 2030 400,000 $
Recreation (Parks & Recreation Master Plan) (4) 2017 2030 75,000 $ Trails (ATP) 2003 2030 300,000 $
Conservation (Subarea Plan) (5) 2003 2075 2,800,000 $
Noise (4) 2003 2030 75,000 $
Safety & Environmental Justice (2) 2003 2024 90,000 $
Community Enhancement (4) 2003 2030 75,000 $
Total Elements $ 4,795,000
Sustainable Santee Plan 2019 TBD $ 130,000
Total $ 4,925,000
Notes:
1 General plan is made up of multiple elements that are updated periodically to account for changes in the City ov er time. 2 Cost is based on the City budgeted amount for planned update. 3 Cost based on actual costs of last update.
4 Cost based on actual costs of Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update. 5 Cost based on actual costs incurred in the Subarea Plan. The Conserv ation Element includes Open Space, w hich w as funded by Council and is required to be updated sooner than 2075.

Source:

City prov ided information.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 68 December 2024 City of Santee
The future developments fair share of the General Plan updates allocated to new development based on the allocation of future population to Buildout population. The total cost for future development is then divided by the future service population to establish the total cost per resident/worker as shown in Table 10-2.

Table 10-2: Long Range Planning Cost per Resident/Worker Planned Level of Service
The City plans to allocate the fair share cost of the Long Range Planning documents to new development, as shown on Table 10-2. Per AB602, when applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. This Nexus Study identified the total cost for future General Plan updates and Sustainable Santee Plan and allocated the cost proportionally between existing and new development. The City will have to use other funding sources such as General Fund revenue or Grants to fund existing developments share of the cost.

Description Value
Future Facilities
Long Range Planning Updates 4,925,000 $
Population
Existing Service Population 66,214
Total Buildout Service Population 82,028
Net Future Population 15,814
Population Allocation
Existing Service Population 81%
Future Additional Population 19%
Total Population 100%
Cost Allocation
Existing Service Population 3,989,250 $
Future Additional Population 935,750 $
Total $ 4,925,000
Total Cost per Resident $ 59.17
Total Cost per Worker $ 21.89
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 69 December 2024 City of Santee
Fee Methodology
The Long Range Planning Fee is calculated using the Planned Facility Method. As stated in the “Impact Fee Nexus Study Template” prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, the Planned Facility Method “Estimates the costs for future facilities needed to serve new development based on a long range expenditure plan for these future facility costs.” This method is appropriate when planned facilities are mostly for the benefit of new development.

The Long Range Planning Fee per unit is calculated by multiplying the cost per resident/worker by the average number of resident/worker equivalents per unit type (density). The cost per capita for non-residential land uses is weighted using the factors shown in Table 3-4. For residential uses, the fee per unit must be converted to a fee per square foot for each unit type by dividing by the average size of each unit. Table 10-3 summarizes these calculations.

Table 10-3: Long Range Planning Fee Summary
Capital Improvement Projects and Revenue Projections
Table 10-1 shows the planned future projects to be funded by this fee. Table 10-4 summarizes the anticipated Long Range Planning Fee revenues collected at Buildout. To ensure that the City can meet the needs of the growing community, the City may choose to introduce additional elements to the General Plan.

Using actual costs from previous General Plan updates and budgeted costs for future updates, additional elements may cost between $75,000 and $2,800,000 each. Revenues collected through development impact fees will not fully fund the currently planned updates. Table 10-4 shows the approximate Long Range Planning Fee revenues collected at Buildout.

Land Use
Cost Per Resident /
Worker Density Fee
Average Unit
Size (SF) Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family 59.17 $ 2.93 173.37 $ 2,200 0.08 $
Multi Family 59.17 $ 2.37 140.23 $ 1,600 0.09 $
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF)
Commercial 21.89 $ 1.82 39.84 $
Office 21.89 $ 4.00 87.56 $
Industrial 21.89 $ 0.40 8.76 $
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 70 December 2024 City of Santee
Table 10-4: Anticipated Long Range Planning Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout Nexus Requirement Summary
The Long Range Planning Fee component of this DIF Study meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described in this section.

Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.

The purpose of the Long Range Planning Fee is to fund new development’s fair-share portion of updates to the General Plan elements that are necessary to mitigate the impacts of new development. New residents and workers change the landscape of the City and necessitate updates to the General Plan and Sustainable Santee Plan.

Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.

The Long Range Planning Fee will be used to fund new development’s fair-share portion of the General Plan and Sustainable Santee Plan based on the allocation of costs to existing and new development based on the service population. The anticipated fee revenue at Buildout is shown on using actual costs from previous updates and budgeted costs for future updates, additional elements may cost between $75,000 and $2,800,000 each. Revenues collected through development impact fees will not fully fund the currently planned updates. Table 10-4 shows the approximate Long Range Planning Fee revenues collected at Buildout.

Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

The fee will be used to fund new General Plan and Sustainable Santee Plan updates that are necessary to serve the increased residents and workers in the City. New development generates Land Use
Proposed
Fee (1)
Anticipated
Growth
(units)
Anticipated
Growth
Anticipated Fee
Collection at
Buildout (2)
Residential (per SF) (Total SF)
Single Family 0.08 $ 1,444 3,176,800 254,144.00 $
Multi Family 0.09 $ 4,466 7,145,600 643,104.00 $
Non-Residential (per 1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Commercial 39.84 $ 1,020.34 40,650.35 $
Office 87.56 $ 83.92 7,348.04 $
Industrial 8.76 $ 1,266.30 11,092.79 $
Total $ 956,339.17
Notes:
1 The proposed fee includes the administrativ e portion of the fee. 2 Total anticipated fee rev enue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 71 December 2024 City of Santee
additional residents and workers which changes the planning landscape of the City. The Planned Facility Method estimates the costs for future facilities needed to serve new development based on a long range expenditure plan for these future facility costs.” Table 10-1 identifies the future general plan costs and Table 10-2 new developments fair share of the cost and the cost per resident/worker. Workers are weighted less than residents to reflect lower per capita service demand. Non-residential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units, so it is reasonable to assume that average per-worker demand for services is less than average perresident demand. The 0.37-weighting factor for workers is based upon a 45-hour work week (40 hours of work plus 1 hour lunch break) relative to a resident’s non-working time of 123 hours (168 hours per week less 45 work hours).

The cost per capita/worker is then allocated to each development type based on the estimated persons per household and employees per 1,000 square feet. Table 10-3 calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size and cost per 1,000 square feet for non-residential. Calculating the fees based on the new residents or employees generated ensures a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development project.

Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

Each new development is anticipated to generate new residents and workers. The addition of new residents and workers creates the need for updates to the Long Range Planning documents. The Long Range Planning Fee is based on the number of applicable workers and/or residents each new development is expected to generate, thus ensuring that the need for the updates is directly related to a particular development’s impact. New workers generate a smaller demand than a resident, thus one worker is considered, on average, as equivalent to 0.37 that of a resident. The fee for each unit type is calculated in Table 10-3.

As new development is constructed, new updates to the General Plan elements are needed for these planning documents. The fee is based on the Planned Facility Method and the total cost of the future updates is allocated between the existing service population and the new service population.

Therefore, new development pays their fair share of the of the costs for of the General Plan and other Long Range Planning documents.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 72 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 11 Program Administration Fee
Background
The City, with assistance from consultants, oversees the implementation and administration of the existing and future Fee Program, consistent with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.

AB602, which came into effect on January 1, 2022, adds additional nexus study requirements.

Furthermore, AB1483, which became effective January 1, 2020, requires that public agencies make certain information available on their website, increasing the administrative responsibilities of the City.

A two percent (2%) Administrative Fee is added to fund the costs of the City’s management and ongoing fee program administration, collection, and reporting, based on an analysis of the cost administrative cost necessary to support the DIF Program. This includes costs associated with City staff and consultant time, studies, and administration to support the program. Furthermore, AB602, adds additional administration and reporting cities are responsible for meeting. Industry standard ranges from three to six percent (3-6%) of the fee for the administrative component of a development fee program. The administrative functions include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Annual fee adjustments
• Annual fee reporting
• Additional fee reporting every five years
• Posting of nexus studies and fee schedules on the City’s website • Nexus study updates every eight years (an AB602 requirement) • Master Plans necessary to support the Nexus study updates • Staff and consultant time related to fee preparation, collection, tracking, and administration
• Staff and consultant time needed to track credits and reimbursements for improvements constructed in the fee program
In addition to the aforementioned administrative activities, the City is responsible for both (i) using fee revenues to plan for and construct required capital facilities and (ii) pursue other funding sources, as required, to bridge financial gaps between what is collected and the actual cost to construct needed facilities. A flat fee will impair the City’s ability to abide by AB602’s rigorous requirements.

Consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act, the Administrative Fee will be collected to fund the cost of the program administrative activities, such as administration, collection, and reporting. The Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 73 December 2024 City of Santee
costs to administer will vary each year. In addition to annual program reporting activities and additional fee reporting requirements every five years, AB602 requires the Nexus Study must be updated at least every eight years.

Table 11-1 shows the proposed Program Administration Fee as two percent (2%) of the total Impact Fees charged on each project.

Table 11-1: Program Administration Fee
It is anticipated that administrative costs will continue to increase due to the additional requirements of the state legislation. It is also anticipated that revenue and expenditures will vary year to year due to the cyclical nature of five-year reporting requirements, nexus study updates, and the housing market.

The table below estimates the City’s administrative cost for the fee program and the fee revenue generated. The City’s average annual cost for staff time is based on the City’s current cost related to development impact fee administration. This includes the cost of the Nexus Study, which the City would incur every eight years. Therefore, the annual cost is divided by eight. Given the increase of state legislation, reporting requirements, potential questions, and agreements, the table below estimates additional staff time moving forward. Given the cyclical nature of nexus updates, reporting requirements, and master plans, the cost are shown for those over eight years, based on the escalated cost of the current nexus study, staff time, and other estimated cost. The fee revenue is shown assuming a 2050 Buildout. While the fee revenue is higher, it is assumed that the costs shown are very conservative and a surplus would be needed for additional studies or additional future requirements.

Land Use Public Facilities Traffic Signal Traffic Mitigation Drainage Park in-Lieu Fire Facilities Long Range
Planning Administration (1)
Residential
Single Family 5.21 $ 0.37 $ 2.68 $ 0.35 $ 6.66 $ 1.75 $ 0.08 $ 0.34 $ Multi-Family 5.79 $ 0.29 $ 2.07 $ 0.43 $ 7.41 $ 1.95 $ 0.09 $ 0.36 $ Non-Residential
Commercial Exempt 1,884.95 $ 13,462.20 $ 1,689.92 $ Exempt 887.29 $ 39.84 $ 359.28 $ Office Exempt 1,040.14 $ 7,428.64 $ 631.53 $ Exempt 1,950.08 $ 87.56 $ 222.76 $ Industrial Exempt 240.67 $ 1,718.83 $ 1,295.13 $ Exempt 195.01 $ 8.76 $ 69.17 $ Notes:
1 An administrative fee (2% of each fee) is collected for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) development impact fee program administration costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analysis. (Fee per Square Foot)
(Fee per 1,000 Building Square Foot)
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 74 December 2024 City of Santee
Nexus Requirement Summary
AB 1600 requires that public agencies satisfy five requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project. The required findings are as follows.

Requirement 1: Identify the purpose of the fee.

The purpose of the Program Administration Fee is to provide the funding necessary to administer and update the Fee Program. This includes consultant and City staff time related to services such as providing fee quotes, updating the fee program, tracking revenue and expenditures, updating the City’s website, and preparing annual and five-year reports.

Annual
Escalation
Staff
Time1
Nexus
Study2
Master
Plan3
AB1600
Reporting4Total
3% 12,346 $ 7,624 $ 37,500 $ 9,074 $ 66,544 $
$ 7,852 12,716 $ 38,625 $ 9,346 $ 68,540 $
$ 8,088 13,098 $ 39,784 $ 9,626 $ 70,596 $
$ 8,331 13,491 $ 40,977 $ 9,915 $ 72,714 $
$ 8,331 13,491 $ 40,977 $ 9,915 $ 72,714 $
$ 8,581 13,896 $ 42,207 $ 15,213 $ 79,895 $
$ 8,838 14,312 $ 43,473 $ 10,669 $ 77,292 $
$ 9,103 14,742 $ 44,777 $ 10,989 $ 79,611 $
$ 9,376 15,184 $ 46,120 $ 11,319 $ 81,999 $
$ 93,500 151,400 $ 459,900 $ 116,700 $ 821,500 $
$ 11,700 18,900 $ 57,500 $ 14,600 $ 102,700 $
Average Annual Revenue (assuming 2050 Buildout)5
$ 158,669
1 Includes average annual staff time based on actual cost incurred by staff over the past two years. Cost related to the Nexus Study was divided by 8 years. Additional staff time related to posting of information per AB 1483, additional staff time to administer this fee program, fee credits/reimbursements, additional legislative requirements and legal review, and other administrative duties related to the fee program. Cost related to the staff time for the master plans is included. 2 Projected annual cost based on 8 years for the next Nexus Study update. Based on the current cost for the Nexus Study. 3 Assumes two Master Plans to support the Nexus Study every 8 years. Assumes $150,000 for each in FY 23-24 cost. 4 Assumed additional costs starting in FY 24-25 for AB516 requirements and additional cost in FY 29-30 for the five-year reporting requirements.
5 Estimated annual revenue is slightly higher, but the estimated revenue is cyclical in nature and the City is responsible for both (i) using fee revenues to plan for and construct required capital facilities and (ii) pursuing other funding sources, as required, to bridge financial gaps between what is collected and the actual cost to construct needed facilities. The cost shown in this table is conservative for the administrative cost burden for the City.

Fiscal Year
FY 26-27
FY 25-26
Current
FY 27-28
FY 28-29
FY 29-30
Total (rounded)
Annual Average (rounded)
FY 30-31
FY 31-32
FY 32-33
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 75 December 2024 City of Santee
Requirement 2: Identify the use of the fee.

The Program Administration Fee will be used to fund the management and administration of the Fee Program. This includes consultant and City staff time related to services such as posting of nexus studies and fee schedules on the City’s website, annual fee adjustments, annual fee reporting, additional fee reporting every five years, application and tracking of fee credits/reimbursements, periodic nexus study updates, staff and consultant time related to fee preparation, collection, tracking and administration.

Requirement 3: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

New residents and workers that result from new development increases the demand for new infrastructure and facilities. These new infrastructure and facility projects will be funded through the Fee program, which requires City and consultant staff time to manage and administer. The Program Administration Fee is a two percent (2%) mark-up of the DIFs.

Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

Each new development adds residents or workers to the City and in order to maintain the City’s desired level of service, public facilities, traffic facilities (including traffic signals), drainage, fire facilities must be built and parkland acquired, and general plan documents completed. These facilities are funded through the DIFs. To ensure these fees for new development are administered according to state law, regular updates, tracking and reporting, staff time is required. In addition, City staff must provide fee quotes for new development. To collect the funding for these resulting activities, the Program Administration Fee is based on a two percent (2%) mark-up of the Fee Program as summarized in Table 11-1. Using a percentage of the DIFs, ensures that each new development is charged their fair share. A two percent (2%) fee is below the industry standard range of three to six percent (3-6%).

The Program Administration Fee provides the funding to administer the DIFs. Having an adopted a policy of collecting a two percent (2%) mark-up to administer fee programs is slightly below the industry standard and effective. Since this fee is calculated as a mark-up of the other DIFs as summarized in Table 11-1, each land use pays for their fair share of the management costs based on their impact to the City’s infrastructure.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 76 December 2024 City of Santee
Section 12 Implementation and Administration
Implementation
According to the California Government Code, prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee, an agency must hold at least one open and public meeting with at least 30 days’ notice. In addition, notice of the time and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered, and a statement that the data required by this section is available, shall be mailed at least 14 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the local agency for mailed notice of the meeting on new or increased fees or service charges. Any written request for mailed notices shall be valid for one year from the date on which it is filed unless a renewal request is filed. At least ten days prior to this meeting, the agency must make data on infrastructure costs and funding sources available to the public. Notice of the time and place of the meeting and a general explanation of the matter are to be published in accordance with Section 6062a of the Government Code, which states that publication of notice shall occur for ten days in a newspaper regularly published once a week or more. The new or increased fees shall be effective no earlier than 60 days following the final action on the adoption or increase of the fees.

Fee Program Administrative Requirements
The Government Code requires the City to report every year and every fifth year certain financial information regarding the fees. The City must make available within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year the following information from the prior fiscal year:

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

2. The amount of the fee.

3. The beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

4. The amount of the fee collected and the interest earned.

5. An identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures.

6. An identification of an approximate date by which time construction on the improvement will commence if it is determined that sufficient funds exist to complete the project.

7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account and when it will be repaid.

8. Identification of any refunds made once it is determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund all fee related projects.

Beginning in 2024, the code has been expanded to include and expand on some of the requirements. The following requirement was added:

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 77 December 2024 City of Santee
An identification of each improvement identified pursuant to requirement #6 listed on a previous report and whether construction began on the approximate date noted within that report. If construction did not commence by the approximate date provided in the previous report, identify the reason for the delay and a revised approximate commencement date.

In addition, requirement 8 was expanded to now require the following information:

Identification of any refunds made and the number of persons or entities identified to receive those refunds once it is determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund all fee related projects.

The City must make this information available for public review and must also present it at the next regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after this information is made available to the public.

For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the City must make the following findings with respect to any remaining funds in the fee account, regardless of whether those funds are committed or uncommitted:

1. Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.

2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.

3. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing any incomplete improvements.

4. Designate the approximate dates on which funding in item (3) above is expected to be deposited into the fee account.

Based on new legislation, a local agency shall inform a person paying a fee subject of both of the following:
• The person’s right to request an audit pursuant to Section 66023. • The person’s right, pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), to file a written request for mailed notice of the local agency’s meeting to review the information made public pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b).

A local agency shall provide a person paying a fee subject to this section a link to the page on the local agency’s internet website where the information made public pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) is available for review.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 78 December 2024 City of Santee
Fee Adjustment Procedures
The DIFs may be adjusted periodically to reflect revised facility requirements, receipt of funding from alternative sources (i.e., state or federal grants), revised facilities or costs, changes in demographics, changes in the average unit square footage, or changes in the land use plan. In accordance with Santee Municipal Code section 12.30.050, Santee Development Impact Fees are automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year. The inflation adjustment is two percent or based on the previous calendar years increase in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (CPI-U:

All Items) as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, whichever is higher. The Municipal Code will need to be updated to adjusting annually on July 1st based on the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the 20-City Average as reported by Engineering News Record (ENR) for a twelvemonth period or a similar published index if the CCI Index is no longer available.

Timing of Fee Payment
Fees will be collected at the time the building permit for the project is issued. All residential projects will pay a fee based on the livable square footage of the residential unit(s). For highdensity residential projects, the fee will be due at the time of the building permit for each building.

For high-density residential projects, the non-residential communal portion (i.e., clubhouse, maintenance facility, gym, etc.) will not be assessed impact fees as the impact is assumed to be captured in the residential fees. Area that are accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be charged impact fees according to use.

Credits and Reimbursement Policies
The City may provide fee credits or reimbursements to developers who dedicate land or construct eligible facilities. Fee credits or reimbursements may be provided up to the cost of the improvement, as shown in this study, subject to periodic inflation adjustments, or the actual cost paid by the developer, whichever is lower. For construction cost overruns, only that amount shown in the study, subject to periodic inflation adjustments, would be credited or reimbursed. The City will evaluate the appropriate fee credit or reimbursement based on the value of the dedication or improvement. Credits or reimbursements may be repaid based on the priority of the capital improvements, as determined by the City. The City will determine fee credits and reimbursements on a case-by-case basis and possibly through the use of a development agreement.

Administrative Fee
A Program Administrative Fee of two (2) percent of the total DIF Program cost is included as its own fee and may be used for costs for legal, accounting, and other administrative support and development impact fee program administration costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analysis. Additionally, the administrative fee may be used to fund the impact fee nexus study updates that must be updated at Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 79 December 2024 City of Santee
a minimum every eight (8) years pursuant to AB602. Please refer to Section 11 for a breakdown of the administration fee and additional information.

Programming Revenues with the CIP
The City should maintain its CIP to adequately plan for future infrastructure needs. The CIP should commit all projected fee revenues and fund balances to specific projects that are necessary to serve growth as described in this report. The use of the CIP provides documentation necessary for the City to hold funds in a project account for longer than five years if necessary to collect sufficient funds to complete a project. In addition, the CIP is required per AB602. This report outlines the projects that are to be funded with the fee program and forms the basis of the CIP, as shown in Appendix A.

Fee Reporting
Assembly Bill No. 1483, which became effective January 1, 2020, requires that public agencies make the following information available on their website. The following information must be provided:

1. A current schedule of fees, exactions, and affordability requirements imposed by the city, county, or special district, including any dependent special districts, of the city or county applicable to a proposed housing development project, which shall be presented in a manner that clearly identifies the fees, exactions, and affordability requirements that apply to each parcel.

2. All zoning ordinances and development standards, which shall specify the zoning, design, and development standards that apply to each parcel.

3. The list of information required to be compiled pursuant to Section 65940.

4. The current and five previous annual fee reports or the current and five previous annual financial reports, which were required pursuant to subdivision.

5. An archive of impact fee nexus studies, cost of service studies, or equivalent, conducted by the city, county, or special district on or after January 1, 2018.

Any updates to the above information must be available within 30 days.

Accessory Dwelling Units
An Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is a second unit that is attached or detached from a singlefamily home. In accordance with Assembly Bill No. 881 approved on October 9, 2019, fees will not be charged for an ADU that is less than 750 square feet. For an ADU that is 750 square feet or larger, the ADU will be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. Since the residential fees are now being charged on a square footage basis, ADU fees will be calculated by multiplying the Single-Family Residential fee by the ADU’s square footage.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 80 December 2024 City of Santee
Specialized Development Projects
The fees in this Report may not apply to specialized development projects such as golf courses, cemeteries, sports stadium, or other specialized land uses. For specialized development projects the City will review the development’s impacts to determine the applicable fees. The fee rates presented in this Report may be reduced, exempted, or waived under certain circumstances as determined by the City. Any exemption or reduction in fees will be based on the City’s independent analysis and review of the subject property. In addition, for reuse, density increasing, or rezone projects, the developer shall only be responsible for paying fees for the intensification of the development. In cases of disaster, impact fees will not be charged on the rebuilding of the structures that were affected by the disaster to the extent that the overall size and use of the new structure is similar to the structure destroyed by the disaster. The City will review the development’s increased impacts to determine the applicable fees.

Some developments may include more than one land use type. In these cases, the fee is calculated separately for each land use. The City has the discretion to impose the fees based on the specific aspects of a proposed development regardless of zoning. The fee imposed should be based on the land use type that most closely represents the impacts of the development.

Rebuild or Expansion Projects
For reuse, expansions, density increasing, or rezone projects, the developer shall only be responsible for paying fees for the intensification or expansion. For example, if a homeowner wishes to build an addition to their home that is 100 square feet, the homeowner would be responsible for paying fees for the 100 square foot addition. The City will review the new development’s impacts to determine the applicable fees on a case-by-case basis.

In cases of rebuilding a structure after a demolition, impact fees will not be assessed on the rebuild to the extent that the overall size and use of the new structure is similar to the structure prior to demolition. Similarly, in cases of disaster, impact fees will not be charged on the rebuilding of the structures that were affected by the disaster to the extent that the overall size and use of the new structure is the same as the structure destroyed by the disaster. Impact fees for the new structure will be calculated based on the new rebuilt structure and the fees paid for the previous structure, and the difference between these fees will be assessed. No refunds will be made for rebuilds that have a lower impact fee than the previous structure.

Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 81 December 2024 City of Santee
Appendix A: Capital Improvement Plan
Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 82 December 2024 City of Santee
Table A-1: Capital Improvement Plan (Page 1 of 2)

Projects Total Project Cost Other Funding Expected DIF Project Cost Public Facilities
Santee Community Center $ 16,800,000 21,000,000 $ 4,200,000 $ Future Park Recreation Facilities (assumes 74.08 acres) (1) $ - 53,708,000 $ 53,708,000 $ Subtotal Public Facilities $ 16,800,000 74,708,000 $ $ 57,908,000 Traffic Signal
6 Phase Signal (Magnolia Ave & Princess Joann Rd) $ - 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 6 Phase Signal (Cottonwood Ave & Riverview Pkwy) $ - 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 8 Phase Signal (Woodside Ave & Mission Del Magnolia/Riderwood Terrance) 450,000 $ - $ 450,000 $ 6 Phase Signal (Mission Gorge Rd & Marrokal Ln) $ - 415,000 $ 415,000 $ Pedestrian Signal - Hawk (Mission Gorge Rd & Forester Creek) $ - 220,000 $ 220,000 $ Pedestrian Signal - Hawk (Cuyamaca St & South River Trail) $ - 220,000 $ 220,000 $ Pedestrian Signal - Hawk (Prospect Ave & Forester Creek) $ - 220,000 $ 220,000 $ Update/replace traffic signal cabinet and controllers $ - 196,000 $ 196,000 $ Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades $ - 107,800 $ 107,800 $
Audible Pedestrian Signal Button Installation $ - 392,000 $ 392,000 $ Smart Signals and Controller/Detection Upgrades $ - 1,680,000 $ 1,680,000 $ Signal Modification (Carlton Oaks Dr & Wethersfield Rd) $ - 439,000 $ 439,000 $ Signal Modification (Mast Blvd & Calton Hills Blvd) $ - 203,900 $ 203,900 $ Install new fiberoptic communication $ 160,000 216,000 $ 56,000 $ Install new fiberoptic communication $ 630,000 1,134,000 $ 504,000 $ Subtotal Traffic Signal $ 790,000 6,723,700 $ 5,933,700 $ Traffic Mitigation
Cottonwood Avenue River Crossing $ - 20,786,000 $ 20,786,000 $ Cottonwood Avenue Widening and Sidewalk Improvements $ 9,486,992 12,130,000 $ 2,643,008 $ Graves Avenue Street Improvements $ 5,900,236 7,544,000 $ 1,643,764 $ Magnolia Avenue Widening $ 3,743,177 4,786,000 $ 1,042,823 $ Median Modification - Mission Gorge Road at Marketplace $ 437,981 560,000 $ 122,019 $ Olive Lane Improvements $ 2,229,013 2,850,000 $ 620,987 $ Prospect Avenue Improvements - West $ 16,633,129 21,267,000 $ 4,633,871 $ Subtotal Traffic Mitigation $ 38,430,528 69,923,000 $ 31,492,472 $ Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 83 December 2024 City of Santee
Table A-1: Capital Improvement Plan (Page 1 of 2)
Projects Total Project Cost Other Funding Expected DIF Project Cost Drainage
Project 1A $ - 4,270,000 $ 4,270,000 $
Project 1B $ - 790,000 $ 790,000 $
Project 1C $ - 1,540,000 $ 1,540,000 $
Project 2 $ - 3,420,000 $ 3,420,000 $
Project 3.1A $ - 630,000 $ 630,000 $
Project 3.1B $ - 270,000 $ 270,000 $
Project 3.2 $ - 410,000 $ 410,000 $
Project 3.3 $ - 520,000 $ 520,000 $
Project 4.1 $ - 2,520,000 $ 2,520,000 $
Project 4.2 $ - 370,000 $ 370,000 $
Project 5.1 $ - 2,640,000 $ 2,640,000 $
Project 5.2 $ - 4,410,000 $ 4,410,000 $
Project 6 $ - 970,000 $ 970,000 $
Project 7 $ - 2,590,000 $ 2,590,000 $
Subtotal Drainage $ - 25,350,000 $ 25,350,000 $
Park In-Lieu
Future Park Land (assumes 74.08 acres) (1) $ - 74,080,000 $ 74,080,000 $ Subtotal Park In-Lieu $ - 74,080,000 $ 74,080,000 $
Fire Facilities (2)
Fire Station 4 Rebuild $ - 25,200,000 $ 25,200,000 $
Fire Station 5 Replacement $ - 14,000,000 $ 14,000,000 $ Fire Station 20 Construction $ - 21,000,000 $ 21,000,000 $ Fire Station 28 Construction $ - 16,000,000 $ 16,000,000 $ Fleet Maintenance Facility $ - 5,797,400 $ 5,797,400 $
Subtotal Fire Facilities $ - 81,997,400 $ 81,997,400 $
Long Range Planning
Land Use Element $ Potential Grants 680, 680,000 $ 000
Housing Element $ Potential Grants 300, 300,000 $ 000
Mobility Element $ Potential Grants 400, 400,000 $ 000
Recreation Element $ Potential Grants 75 75,000 $ ,000
Trails (ATP) $ Potential Grants 300, 300,000 $ 000
Conservation Element (Subarea Plan) $ Potential Grants 2,800,0 2,800,000 $ 00 Noise Element $ Potential Grants 75 75,000 $ ,000
Safety & Environmental Justice Element $ Potential Grants 90 90,000 $ ,000 Community Enhancement Element $ Potential Grants 75 75,000 $ ,000 Sustainable Santee Plan $ Potential Grants 130, 130,000 $ 000 Subtotal Long Range Planning $ - 4,925,000 $ 4,925,000 $ Total (Rounded) $ 56,020,528 337,707,100 $ 281,686,572 $ Notes:
1 The specific location of park improv ements w ill be dictated by the indiv idual dev elopments and cannot be determined at this time. The assumed acreage is calculated using the General Plan standard of 5 acres per 1,000 people and grow th assumptions in the City . 2 Fire Facilities identified in the Santee Adopted Capital Improv ement Program (Fiscal Years 2024-28) and by the Fire Chief. 60139.00162\43019068.1
ORDINANCE NO. ___________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SANTEE, AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE
SANTEE MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 12 “SUBDIVISION
OF LAND, DEVELOPMENT FEES, AND DEDICATIONS”
AND CHAPTER 12.30 “DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES”

AND FINDING THAT THE ACTIONS ARE EXEMPT

FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, the City of Santee, California (the “City”) is a charter city, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, pursuant to article XI, section 5 of the California Constitution and Government Code section 37100, the legislative body of a city may pass ordinances not in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the State of California or the United States; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the police powers delegated to it by the California Constitution, the City has the authority to enact laws which promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City currently imposes Development Impact Fees (the “Fees”) and administers a Fee program applicable to all new development within the City to recover the costs of capital facilities, infrastructure, vehicles, and equipment to mitigate the demands placed upon the City caused by new development; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code, section 66000, et seq. (also known as the “Mitigation Fee Act” or the “Act”) the City is required to complete certain procedural and substantive requirements prior to imposing the Fees; and WHEREAS, the City retained an independent consultant to conduct and prepare an impact fee nexus study, the Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study dated December 2024, (the “Study”), attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, based upon the findings of the Study, the City wishes to increase existing development impact fee category amounts; implement new categories of development impact fees for fire facilities, long range planning and program administration; and change the methodology how the Fees are imposed on residential projects requiring the City Council to update the City’s Municipal Code (the “Code”) to account for these actions and other necessary updates thereto; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

ATTACHMENT 2
60139.00162\43019068.1

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTEE, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings. The evidence supporting such findings, including a complete description of such findings, can be found in the Study, which is incorporated herein by this reference. The Study:

A. Identifies the purpose of the Fees;
B. Identifies the use to which the Fees will be put;
C. Shows a reasonable relationship between the use of the Fees and the type of development project on which the Fees are imposed; D. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the type of development projects on which the Fees are imposed; and
E. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Fees and the cost of the public facilities or portion of the public facilities attributable to the development on which the Fees are imposed.

Section 3. Fee Uses. The City Council hereby determines that the Fees collected shall be used to finance the public facilities described or identified in the Study or other such facility plans as may be proposed, modified, or amended from time to time by the City Council.

Section 4. Adoption of the Study and Fees. Pursuant to Section 12.30.050, the City Council shall adopt the Fees established by the Study by resolution to be adopted concurrently with the adoption of this Ordinance.

Section 5. Determination of the Fees. The Fees as set forth in Exhibit “A” to this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference shall be determined and imposed on the following basis:

A. For residential property – Fees for residential property (i.e., single-family and multifamily property) are calculated by multiplying the total square footage included in the building permit multiplied by the Fee rate per square foot (dollars per square foot per unit) for each residential unit of property.

B. For non-residential property (excluding Drainage Fees) – Fees for nonresidential property (i.e., any land use other than residential property) 60139.00162\43019068.1
are calculated by multiplying the total square footage of structures included in the building permit, divided by 1,000, and multiplied by the Fee rate (dollars per 1,000 square feet per unit) for the respective nonresidential land uses. a. Drainage Fees for Non-residential property – Drainage Fees for non-residential property are the product of the total square footage, divided by 1,000, of impermeable surface to be constructed, including, but not limited to, roof area of structures, parking lots, driveways, patios, streets, and sidewalks, and the Fee rate (dollars per 1,000 square feet per unit) for the respective non-residential land uses.

Section 6. Municipal Code. Chapter 12.30 of the City’s Code shall be updated and amended as follows. All other provisions of Chapter 12.30 not expressly amended by this Ordinance as set forth herein shall remain in full force and effect:

A. Section 12.30.020, subdivision B shall be amended to read: “B. The purpose of the fees established by this chapter is to impose upon new development the costs of constructing public facilities which are reasonably related to the impacts of the new development. New development in the City will require the construction of new public facilities, including, without limitation, drainage improvements, traffic improvements, traffic signals, public park facilities, community facilities and other public improvements, fire facilities, facilities identified as part of the City’s long range planning, and program administration. The City Council finds that it is in the interest of the public's health, safety and welfare for new development to pay the costs of constructing the public facilities reasonably related to the impacts of the new development.” B. Section 12.30.020, subdivision D shall be amended to read: “D. The City Council finds that there is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees established by this chapter and the types of development on which the fees are imposed. The public facilities, include, without limitation, drainage improvements, traffic improvements, traffic signals, public park facilities, community facilities and other public improvements, fire facilities, facilities identified as part of the City’s long range planning, and program administration for which the fees are collected are reasonably related to the types of development to which they apply.”
C. Section 12.30.020, subdivision E shall be amended to read: “E. The City Council finds that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the types of development projects to which the fees apply. The public facilities, drainage improvements, traffic improvements, traffic signals, fire facilities, facilities identified as part of the City’s long range planning, and program administration that the fees 60139.00162\43019068.1
are to be used for, are needed because of the impacts caused by the type of development projects to which they apply.”
D. Section 12.30.040, shall have the following subdivision added to read:
“E. Park-in-lieu fee is for the acquisition and development of park facilities.”
E. Section 12.30.040, shall have the following subdivision added to read:
“F. Fire facilities fee is to fund the construction of new fire stations and procurement of apparatus and equipment.”
F. Section 12.30.040, shall have the following subdivision added to read:
“G. Long range planning fee is for the purpose of funding updates to the City’s General Plan Elements and Sustainable Santee Plan as amended.”
G. Section 12.30.040, shall have the following subdivision added to read:
“H. Program administration fee is a two percent (2%) fee to be added to the amount of the development impact fees due for a project to fund the costs of the City’s management and ongoing program administration, collection, and reporting costs necessary to carry out the City’s development impact fee program.”
H. Section 12.30.050, subdivision C shall be amended to read: “C. The development impact fees, exclusive of the RTCIP mitigation fee, are automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year. The inflation adjustment is the greater of two percent (2%) or based on the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the 20-City Average as reported by the Engineering News Record for a twelve-month period, or a similar published index if the CCI is no longer available.”
I. Section 12.30.060, subdivision A shall be amended to read: “A. Subject to California Government Code section 66007, developers must pay the applicable development impact fees to the City at issuance of the building permit for the purpose of defraying the actual or estimated cost of the installation of any public facilities.”
J. Section 12.30.070, subdivision A shall be amended to read: “A. All development impact fees collection pursuant to this chapter must be placed into separate accounts for each fee type. All such revenue must be expended solely for land acquisition, construction or engineering, and other related costs necessary for the installation of the public facility, or reimbursement for land acquisition, construction or engineering of the public facility for which the fee was collected.”
60139.00162\43019068.1
K. Section 12.30.150 is to be deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:
“§ 12.30.150 Determination of fees.

A. With exception of the RTCIP mitigation fee, all other City development impact fees shall be calculated in accordance to the methodology provided in the authorizing ordinance and/or resolution imposing such fees adopted by the City Council, as may be amended.”
L. Sections 12.30.160, 12.30.180, and 12.30.190 are to be deleted in their entirety. Except section 12.30.160 shall remain in the Code and amended to read a title only: “§ 12.30.160 Reserved.”
Section 7. CEQA. The City Council has reviewed the matter and hereby finds that this Ordinance will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment nor have a significant impact on the environment and is therefore not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3) and/or 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.

Section 8. Prior Fees. Pursuant to section 12.30.050 of the City’s Code, Fees are to be adopted by a resolution of the City Council. Except as provided herein and a subsequent resolution to be adopted concurrently with this Ordinance, any previous action, including any previously adopted ordinance, resolution, fee or charge, is hereby superseded and replaced by this Ordinance and resolution to be adopted concurrently approving the Fees, to the extent such previous action(s) conflict with the provisions herein.

Section 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council of the City of Santee hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrases be declared unconstitutional.

Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Section 11. Certification. The City Clerk is hereby directed to certify the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published as required by law. 60139.00162\43019068.1
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Santee, California, on the 8th day of January, 2025, and thereafter ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council held on this 22nd day of January, 2025, by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED
___________________________________

JOHN MINTO, MAYOR
ATTEST
__________________________________

JAMES JEFFRIES, CITY CLERK
60139.00162\43019068.1
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”
2025 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
60139.00162\43019068.1
B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Ordinance attachment Exhibit “B” – Development
Impact Fee Nexus Study, is the same attachment
previously listed with the Resolution.

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP TO REVIEW AND DISCUSS THE CITY

OF SANTEE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 23, 2024

BACKGROUND
The purpose of this workshop is to review and discuss the findings and recommendations made in the Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the proposed updates to Development Impact Fees (DIFs or Impact Fees) prepared by Harris & Associates.

California’s AB1600, adopted in 1987 and codified as California Government Code Section 66000 et. seq., allows the City to impose Development Impact Fees on new development within the City. DIFs are a one-time charge on new development that is collected and used by the City to cover the cost of capital facilities, infrastructure, vehicles, and equipment that are required to serve new growth.

As provided in the City of Santee Impact Fee Ordinance, Santee collects impact fees from new development to pay for the costs of constructing public facilities which are reasonably related to the impacts of the new development. The City of Santee currently assesses drainage, traffic and traffic signal impact fees on non-residential and residential development, and park-in-lieu and public facilities fees on new residential development. The schedule of established fees may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. They can also be updated administratively by an annual inflation factor that is included as part of the adopting resolution.

The last time the City of Santee conducted a formal Development Impact Fee update was in 2005. Since that time, development impact fees have been automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year based on the previous year’s increase in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) or by 2.0 percent, whichever is higher.

City staff is recommending an updated Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and recommended Development Impact Fee Schedule in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code Section 66000 et seq.), as amended by AB 602.

DISCUSSION
A Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (Nexus Study or Report) is an analysis required by California law that demonstrates the need for additional backbone infrastructure and facilities to serve anticipated growth and identifies the associated costs of those infrastructure facilities and how these costs are recovered through development impact fees.

Attachment 3 – Previously provided October 23, 2024,
Staff Report provided for reference.

Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
The Mitigation Fee Act requires that all public agencies satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project:

1. Identify the purpose of the fee.

2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified.

3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

The purpose of the Nexus Study is to demonstrate that all fee components comply with the Mitigation Fee Act. The assumptions, methodologies, facility standards, costs, and cost allocation factors that were used to establish the nexus between the fees and the development on which the fees will be charged are summarized in the Nexus Study.

AB602 requires that when applicable, the Nexus Study identifies the existing level of service for each public facility, identifies the proposed new level of service, and includes an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. The Nexus Study meets this requirement and includes a CIP to be adopted as part of the Nexus Study.

The Nexus Study report prepared by Harris & Associates satisfies the AB1600 Nexus requirements, AB602 requirements, and provides the necessary technical analysis to support the adoption of updated development impact fees.

In September 2024, Harris & Associates and City staff met with the development community through the Building Industry Association (BIA) as part of the process to receive feedback on the draft report and the proposed fee schedule. Harris & Associated provided a presentation to the BIA and provided a draft report following the meeting. After reviewing the draft report, the BIA had no additional comments or questions regarding the report or the proposed development impact fees. In addition, numerous attempts were made to contact representatives of the Association of General Contractors (AGC) but all attempts were unsuccessful as there was no response from the AGC. The BIA and AGC did not have any questions or comments to be considered by the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 66019.

FEE ANALYSIS
The City completed the last nexus study for the Impact Fees in 2005. At that time the list of projects was amended and the fees for both residential and non-residential were updated based upon the revised project list and revised project construction costs; however, the city has not completed a fee study for the Impact Fees since that time. Because of the extended amount of time, the need to update the project list and construction costs, and to comply with Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
AB602, the City began a new nexus fee study for the Impact Fees with Harris & Associates.

Harris & Associates worked with City staff to update the land uses, assumptions in the analysis, project list, construction costs, and ensuring compliance with AB602.

Currently, Santee collects the following Impact Fees: Public Facilities Fee, Traffic Signal Fee, Traffic Mitigation Fee, Drainage Fee, Park In-Lieu Fee, and RTCIP Fee. The RTCIP Fee is updated annually by SANDAG and therefore, was not included in the Nexus Study. Funds from each of these Impact Fees are maintained in separate accounts until expended pursuant to the requirements of each Impact Fee. The description and purpose of each of these Impact Fees are set forth below:

Public Facilities Fee — The Public Facilities Fee is collected from new development for the installation of passive and active park facilities and for the construction of community buildings/recreation facilities. Public Facilities Fees collected from new development projects are maintained in the Public Facilities Fund.

Traffic Signal Fee — The Traffic Signal Fee is collected from new development for the installation of needed traffic signals identified from the City’s traffic signal needs list and the Nexus Study CIP, once adopted. Traffic Signal Fees collected from new development projects are maintained in the Traffic Signal Fund.

Traffic Mitigation Fee — The Traffic Mitigation Fee is collected from new development for the installation of needed improvements identified in the Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan and the Nexus Study CIP, once adopted. Traffic Mitigation Fees collected from new development projects are maintained in the Traffic Mitigation Fund.

Drainage Fee — The Drainage Fee is collected from new development for the installation of needed drainage improvements identified in the City’s latest master drainage facility study and the Nexus Study CIP, once adopted.

Park In-Lieu Fee — The Park In-Lieu Fee is collected from new development for the acquisition and development of park facilities. Park In-Lieu Fees collected from new development projects are maintained in the Park In-Lieu Fund.

The Nexus Study includes the following proposed new development impact fees:

Fire Facilities Fee — The Fire Facilities Fee is a new proposed DIF that will be collected from new development that will be used to help fund the construction of new fire stations and the procurement of apparatus to serve the City.

Long Range Planning — The Long Range Planning Fee is a new proposed fee and will be collected from new development for the purpose of contributing to fund updates to the City’s General Plan Elements and Sustainable Santee Plan. The General Plan is made up of multiple elements that are updated periodically to account for changes in the City over time. The State of California requires that among these elements be included: Land Use, Conservation, Noise, Environmental Justice, Circulation, Open Space, Safety, Air Quality, and Housing. The City of Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
Santee combines the Safety and Environmental Justice elements and additionally includes a Recreation element.

Program Administration — The Program Administration Fee is a new proposed fee to be collected from new development. There have been recent changes in the Mitigation Fee Act which governs the collection of impact fees. AB602 went into effect in 2022 and added Section 66016.5 to the Mitigation Fee Act and imposed several new requirements on impact fees. Three of those requirements directly impact administration of the City’s development impact fee program. First, AB602 requires that nexus studies be updated every eight years, from the period beginning on January 1, 2022. Second, AB602 requires that all fee studies shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units in the development, unless certain findings are made, and a local agency that imposes the fee utilizing this method shall be deemed to have used a valid method to establish the reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. Third, AB602 states that large jurisdictions shall adopt a CIP as part of the nexus study.

A two percent (2%) Program Administrative Fee is proposed to be added to fund the costs of the City’s management and ongoing fee program administration, collection, and reporting, based on an analysis of the administrative cost necessary to support the DIF Program. This includes costs associated with City staff and consultant time, studies, and administration to support the program and the recent additional administration requirements created by AB602.

The proposed 2 percent fee is below the industry standard of 3 to 6 percent.

The Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study provides an in-depth analysis of each of the impact fee categories, as well as, supporting detail of how the proposed development impact fees meet the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.

SUMMARY OF NEXUS STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS
The following is an overview of the recommended updates to the City’s development impact fee program found in the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study:

1. Adjustments to the existing development impact fees are recommended based on the findings in the Nexus Study.

2. Three new development impact fees are being proposed for Fire Facilities, Long-Range Planning and Program Administration as discussed earlier in this report.

3. A change in the methodology for calculating residential impact fees from a per unit basis to square footage was applied to comply with the proportionality requirement of AB602.

4. It is recommended that annual fee adjustments be based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index instead of the Consumer Price Index. This change would require an update to the City’s Municipal Code.

The proposed Development Impact Fees are provided in the table below. The proposed updates to the fees are described in detail in the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study.

Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
The City recognizes that because there has not been an update to the Nexus study since 2005, the maximum allowable fees would be a considerable increase over the existing fee currently applied to development. The following table compares the proposed fees against the existing fees for residential land uses. Existing residential fees were converted from a fee per dwelling unit to per square foot. Fees for Fire Facilities, General Plan, and Program Administration are new proposed fees so there are no existing fees to compare to.

Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (Residential) Land Use Public Facilities Traffic Signal Traffic Mitigation Drainage Park in-Lieu Fire Facilities Long Range
Planning Administration (1)
Residential
Single Family $ 5.21 $ 0.39 $ 2.82 $ 0.35 $ 6.66 $ 1.75 $ 0.08 $ 0.35 Multi-Family $ 5.79 $ 0.30 $ 2.19 $ 0.43 $ 7.41 $ 1.95 $ 0.09 $ 0.36 Non-Residential
Commercial Exempt $ 1,946.24 $ 14,182.60 $ 1,684.85 Exempt 887.29 $ $ 39.84 $ 374.82 Office Exempt $ 1,073.96 $ 7,826.17 $ 629.63 Exempt 1,950.08 $ $ 87.56 $ 231.35 Industrial Exempt $ 248.49 $ 1,810.81 $ 1,291.25 Exempt 195.01 $ $ 8.76 $ 71.09 Notes:
1 An administrative fee (2% of each fee) is collected for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) development impact fee program administration costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analysis. (Fee per Square Foot)
(Fee per 1,000 Building Square Foot)
Single Family Existing Fee (1) Proposed Fee Percentage Change Public Facilities $ 3.67 $ 5.21 42%
Traffic Signal $ 0.21 $ 0.39 83%
Traffic Mitigation $ 2.07 $ 2.82 36%
Drainage (2) $ 1.99 $ 0.35 -82%
Park in-lieu $ 4.42 $ 6.66 51%
Fire Facilities $ - $ 1.75 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 0.08 N/A
Administration $ - $ 0.35 N/A
TOTAL $ 12.36 $ 17.61 42%
Multi Family Existing Fee (1) Proposed Fee Percentage Change Public Facilities $ 4.56 $ 5.79 27%
Traffic Signal $ 0.18 $ 0.30 63%
Traffic Mitigation $ 1.78 $ 2.19 23%
Drainage $ 1.54 $ 0.43 -72%
Park in-lieu $ 5.54 $ 7.41 34%
Fire Facilities $ - $ 1.95 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 0.09 N/A
Administration $ - $ 0.36 N/A
TOTAL $ 13.60 $ 18.52 36%
Notes:
1 2
Ex isting fees w ere conv erted from a fee per dw elling unit to per square foot using the same residential size assumptions in this study to prov ide a more accurate comparison to the new fee structure.

Drainage Fee for ex isting Single Family takes the av erage of Land Uses: HL, R1, R1A, and R2.

Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
The table below provides a comparison of the proposed fees against the existing fees for nonresidential land uses. Office and Commercial land uses experience a large increase (144% and 50% respectively), mainly due to the Traffic Signal and Traffic Mitigation fees. The existing fee collected on these two land uses were abnormally low. Furthermore, the assumptions for nonresidential development have changed significantly since the prior fee update, which greatly impacted the analysis.

Comparison of Proposed and Existing Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees (Non-Residential) Commercial Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal $ 1,568.00 $ 1,946.24 24%
Traffic Mitigation $ 9,721.00 $ 14,182.60 46%
Drainage $ 1,452.00 $ 1,684.85 16%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities $ - $ 887.29 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 39.84 N/A
Administration $ - $ 374.82 N/A
TOTAL $ 12,741.00 $ 19,115.64 50%
Office Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal $ 470.00 $ 1,073.96 129%
Traffic Mitigation $ 2,913.00 $ 7,826.17 169%
Drainage $ 1,452.00 $ 629.63 -57%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities $ - $ 1,950.08 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 87.56 N/A
Administration $ - $ 231.35 N/A
TOTAL $ 4,835.00 $ 11,798.75 144%
Industrial Existing Fee Proposed Fee Percentage Change
Public Facilities Exempt Exempt Exempt
Traffic Signal $ 197.00 $ 248.49 26%
Traffic Mitigation $ 1,216.00 $ 1,810.81 49%
Drainage $ 1,452.00 $ 1,291.25 -11%
Park in-lieu Exempt Exempt Exempt
Fire Facilities $ - $ 195.01 N/A
General Plan $ - $ 8.76 N/A
Administration $ - $ 71.09 N/A
TOTAL $ 2,865.00 $ 3,625.41 27%
Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024
The DIFs may be adjusted periodically to reflect revised facility requirements, receipt of funding from alternative sources (i.e., state or federal grants), revised facilities or costs, changes in demographics, changes in the average unit square footage, or changes in the land use plan.

In accordance with Santee Municipal Code section 12.30.050, Santee Development Impact Fees are automatically adjusted for inflation on July 1 of each year. The inflation adjustment is two percent or based on the previous calendar years increase in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (CPI-U: All Items) as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, whichever is higher. If the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study is approved, the Municipal Code would need to be updated to adjust fees annually on July 1st based on the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the 20-City Average as reported by Engineering News Record (ENR) for a twelvemonth period or a similar published index if the CCI Index is no longer available.

PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENTS
According to the California Government Code, prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee, an agency must hold at least one open and public meeting with at least 30 days’ notice. In addition, notice of the time and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered, and a statement that the data required by this section is available, shall be mailed at least 14 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the local agency for mailed notice of the meeting on new or increased fees or service charges. Any written request for mailed notices shall be valid for one year from the date on which it is filed unless a renewal request is filed. At least ten days prior to this meeting, the agency must make data on infrastructure costs and funding sources available to the public. Notice of the time and place of the meeting and a general explanation of the matter are to be published in accordance with Section 6062a of the Government Code, which states that publication of notice shall occur for ten days in a newspaper regularly published once a week or more. The new or increased fees shall be effective no earlier than 60 days following the final action on the adoption or increase of the fees.

To meet the above noticing requirements, the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the East County Californian on October 11, 2024, and will be published two additional times on November 1 and November 8, 2024. Staff mailed two letters to interested parties on October 11, 2024. Both the BIA and SDG&E had a written request for notification of fee increases on file with the City Clerk. The Notice of Public Hearing was also posted outside the City Council Chambers on October 11, 2024. The final draft Development Impact Fee Nexus Study will be available for public review in the City Clerk’s Office and made available on the City’s website on November 1, 2024.

The public hearing to adopt the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the proposed updates to the development impact fees, is currently scheduled on November 13, 2024. If the proposed development impact fees are approved, the new fees would take effect at least 60 days following the public hearing on January 13, 2025.

Staff Report – Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Workshop October 23, 2024

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it does not constitute a project, as defined by Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council conduct the public workshop to review and discuss the Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the proposed updated development impact fees. It is further recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing on November 13, 2024, to consider public testimony and adopt the Comprehensive Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and the proposed updated development impact fees.

CITY OF SANTEE – LOCAL APPOINTMENT LIST

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
(Proposed 2025 changes)
Council Committees

CITY COUNCIL & SANTEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONFERENCE COMMITTEE Qualifications: Member of the City Council or School Board; terms are annual Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Vice Mayor Rob McNelis 01/08/25 01/27/27 Representative – Councilmember Dustin Trotter 01/08/25 01/27/27

SANTEE-LAKESIDE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (SLEMSA) Qualifications: Member of the City Council; term is per appointing agency.

Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Councilmember Dustin Trotter 01/08/25 01/27/27 Representative – Councilmember Ronn Hall 01/08/25 01/27/27 Alternate – Mayor John W. Minto 01/08/25 01/27/27

GOODAN RANCH POLICY COMMITTEE
Qualifications: Three elected representatives from the County of San Diego, City of Poway and City of Santee; terms are annual
Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Councilmember Dustin Trotter 01/08/25 01/27/27 Alternate – Vice Mayor Rob McNelis 01/08/25 01/27/27
HEARTLAND COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY COMMISSION*
Each public agency which is a party to this agreement has one seat on the Commission. The cities of El Cajon, Lemon Grove, Santee, and La Mesa, and the Alpine, Bostonia, Lakeside and San Miguel Fire Protection Districts jointly equip, maintain, operate and staff a facility, thereby providing emergency services of receiving and dispatching calls to said public agencies; term is per appointing agency
Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Councilmember Laura Koval 01/08/25 01/27/27 Alternate – Vice Mayor Rob McNelis 01/08/25 01/27/27
*Stipend Received
HEARTLAND FIRE TRAINING FACILITY AUTHORITY COMMISSION*
Qualifications: Agency member Heartland Fire Training Facility Authority; term is per appointing agency Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Vice Mayor Rob McNelis 01/08/25 01/27/27 Alternate – Councilmember Ronn Hall 01/08/25 01/27/27
*Stipend Received
Proposed List
Changes are noted in
yellow highlight
LOCAL APPOINTMENTS LIST, PROPOSED 2025 CHANGES
2 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES*
Qualifications: Member of the City Council; terms are annual.

Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Mayor John W. Minto 01/08/25 01/27/27
Alternate – Councilmember Laura Koval 01/08/25 01/27/27 *Any Council Member may choose to attend any individual event

MISSION TRAILS REGIONAL PARK TASK FORCE
Qualifications: Member of City Council; terms are annual Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Councilmember Dustin Trotter 01/08/25 01/27/27 Alternate – Vice Mayor Rob McNelis 01/08/25 01/27/27
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) Board of Directors* Qualifications: Member of the City Council; terms are annual Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Mayor John W. Minto 01/08/25 01/27/27
Alternate – Councilmember Laura Koval 01/08/25 01/27/27 2nd Alternate – Councilmember Ronn Hall 01/08/25 01/27/27 *Stipend Received
SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM (MTS)*
Qualifications: Member of the City Council; terms are annual.

Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Councilmember Ronn Hall 01/08/25 01/27/27 Alternate – Councilmember Laura Koval 01/08/25 01/27/27 2nd Alternate – Mayor John W. Minto 01/08/25 01/27/27
*Stipend Received

SAN DIEGO RIVER CONSERVANCY BOARD
Qualifications: Member of the City Council; terms are annual.

Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Councilmember Dustin Trotter 01/08/25 01/27/27 Alternate – Councilmember Laura Koval 01/08/25 01/27/27

EAST COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
Qualifications: Member of the City Council; terms are annual Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Councilmember Dustin Trotter 01/08/25 01/27/27 Alternate – Councilmember Ronn Hall 01/08/25 01/27/27
LOCAL APPOINTMENTS LIST, PROPOSED 2025 CHANGES
3 CITIZEN COMMITTEES

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR MISSION TRAILS REGIONAL PARK Qualifications: City of Santee resident; terms are annual

DISTRICT
Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – Gary Strawn 01/08/25 01/27/27 4

COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING COMMITTEE
Requirements: Members are set forth by Council and include a City Council Member, City Manager, Santee Sheriff's Station Commander, representatives from the Santee School District, West Hills High School, Santana High School, Chamber of Commerce, Santee Collaborative, Institute for Public Strategies, CASA/Santee Solutions Coalition, 5 Citizens-At-Large, and honorary member Denette McLagan; term limits are at the pleasure of the legislative body.

DISTRICT
Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – John Minto, Mayor 01/08/25 01/27/27
Citizen-At-Large – Mike Aiken 01/08/25 01/27/27 2
Citizen-At-Large – Linda Roach 01/08/25 01/27/27 3
Citizen-At-Large – Dr. Mark Foreman 01/08/25 01/27/27 1 Citizen-At-Large – Steve Stelman 01/08/25 01/27/27 2
Citizen-At-Large – Peter Diehl 01/08/25 01/27/27 1

GILLESPIE FIELD DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
Qualifications: Expertise and experience in real estate, finance, industrial development or aviation, and have a demonstrated interest in the economic viability of Gillespie Field; term is four years

DISTRICT
Appointed Current Term Expiration
Representative – James Sly 12/14/22 08/06/27 4
MANUFACTURED HOME FAIR PRACTICES COMMISSION*
Qualifications: The Commission consists of five regular members and all members must be resident electors and are appointed by the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council. Term: Each regular member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term and shall hold office until a new member has been duly appointed.

DISTRICT
Appointed Current Term Expiration
Commissioner D’Arcy Granbois 12/14/22 01/28/26 2
Commissioner Edward Vandiver 12/14/22 01/28/26 2
Commissioner Keshav Damoor 01/08/25 01/27/27 4
Commissioner Lili Patch 01/08/25 01/27/27 2
Commissioner Linda Dochterman 01/08/25 01/27/27 4
*Stipend Received
LOCAL APPOINTMENTS LIST, PROPOSED 2025 CHANGES
4 SALARY SETTING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Regular biennial meetings are held on odd-numbered years. Appointments are made by the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council; terms are at the pleasure of the legislative body.

DISTRICT
Appointed Current Term Expiration
John Smith 01/08/25 01/27/27 1
Justin Schlaefli 12/14/22 01/28/26 2
Karen Bisignano 01/08/25 01/27/27 2
Keshav Damoor 01/08/25 01/27/27 4
Lili Patch 12/14/22 01/28/26 2
Robert Dean Velasco 12/14/22 01/28/26 4
Warren Savage 01/08/25 01/27/27 4

SANTEE PARK AND RECREATION COMMITTEE (SPARC)
Resident appointments to the SPARC are made by the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council. Term is at the pleasure of the legislative body.

DISTRICT
Appointed Current Term Expiration
Alan Tuthill 01/08/25 01/27/27 1
Cyndy Carlton 12/14/22 01/28/26 1
Dan Bickford 12/14/22 01/28/26 3
Kathleen Pishny 12/14/22 01/28/26 3
Ken Fox 01/08/25 01/27/27 2
Lynda Marrokal 01/08/25 01/27/27 3
Michelle Dressler 01/08/25 01/27/27 3
Robert “Bob” Llyod 01/08/25 01/27/27 4
Robert Dean Velasco 12/14/22 01/28/26 4
Ryan McCarthy 12/14/22 01/28/26 4
Stephanie Price 01/08/25 01/27/27 2
Anita Bautista – Honorary Member* 01/08/25 01/27/27 1
*Honorary Members have no voting authority

Santee City CouncilJanuary 8, 2025

Santee City Council
January 8, 2025