Ncil20250514 — Santee City Council, May 14, 2025 (part 2 of 2)

Policy 3.2: Ensure that all new development meets established response time standards for fire and life safety services and that all new development in State Responsibility Areas or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones requires fuel modification around homes and subdivisions.

Policy 3.3: Avoid expanding new residential development, essential public facilities, and critical infrastructure in areas subject to extreme threat or high risk, such as High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, or areas classified by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as having an Extreme Threat classification on Fire Threat Maps unless all feasible risk reduction measures have been incorporated into project designs or conditions of approval.

Policy 3.4: Prohibit land uses that could exacerbate the risk of ignitions in High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, such as outdoor storage of hazardous or highly flammable materials, automobile service or gas stations, or temporary fireworks sales.

Policy 3.5: Prohibit land uses that could place occupants at unreasonable risk in High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, such as areas with large events or assembly of people and healthcare facilities.

Policy 3.6: Encourage the use of conservation easements or establish a Transfer of Development Rights Program in undeveloped wildland areas within High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones.

Policy 3.7: Require the installation of fire hydrants and establishment of emergency vehicle access, notably before construction with combustible materials can begin on an approved project.

Policy 3.8: Require emergency access routes in developments to be adequately wide to allow the entry and maneuvering of emergency vehicles to ensure that new development has adequate fire protection.

Development of facilities in high, very high, and extreme fire threat areas are subject to wildfire hazards due to slope and prevailing winds based on location, which would consequently result in higher fire-related risks to people and structures. Through the City’s environmental review process, future development projects associated with the Safety-EJ Element would be required to abide by the 2022 (or most current) California Fire Code and the CBC, which contains measures to reduce fire hazards in structures, including the use of materials, fire separation walls, building separation, and fire sprinklers. In addition to existing policies addressing wildfire in the Santee General Plan Safety Element, the Safety-EJ Element would build upon these policies and include several new policies intended to reduce the exposure of people and the environment to wildland fire risks:

Policy 3.1: Mandate that a proposed development in SRA or Vey High Fire Hazard Severity Zone be approved only after it is determined that a Fire Protection Plan is in place that includes measures to avoid or minimize fire hazards, such as adequate water pressure to maintain the required fire flow at the time of development.

Policy 3.6: Encourage the use of conservation easements or establish a Transfer of Development Rights Program in undeveloped wildland areas within High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones.

Policy 3.7: Require the installation of fire hydrants and establishment of emergency vehicle access, notably before construction with combustible materials can begin on an approved project.

Policy 3.8: Require emergency access routes in developments to be adequately wide to allow the entry and maneuvering of emergency vehicles to ensure that new development has adequate fire protection.

IS/ND 114 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 115 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
Policy 3.9: Mandate that proposed development satisfy the minimum structural fire protection standards in the adopted edition of the Uniform Fire and Building Codes; however, where deemed appropriate, the City of Santee shall enhance the minimum standards to provide optimum protection.

Policy 3.10: Increase resilience of existing development in high-risk areas built prior to modern fire safety codes or wildfire hazard mitigation guidance.

Policy 3.11: Mandate that public and private landowners for all existing land uses comply with all applicable state and local requirements and implement site-specific safety measures that mitigate to a low-risk condition around or near public facilities, infrastructure, and natural resources.

Policy 3.12: Provide information regarding defensible space and building retrofits to achieve a lowrisk condition.

Policy 3.13: Require public and private landowners to minimize the risk of wildfire moving from wildland areas to developed properties or from property to property by increasing structural hardening measures (e.g., fire-rated roofing and fire-resistant construction materials and techniques), maintaining and improving defensible space on site, and supporting vegetation management in adjacent undeveloped areas.

Policy 3.14: Require structures with fire protection sprinkler systems to provide for outside alarm notification.

Policy 3.15: Mitigate existing non-conforming development to contemporary fire safe standards (e.g., road standards, vegetative hazards). Support state legislation that would provide tax incentives to encourage the repair or demolition of structures that could be considered fire hazards.

Policy 3.16: Prioritize infill development within the existing developed footprint to reduce vehicle miles traveled; improve access to jobs, services, and education; increase active transportation choices; avoid future unfunded infrastructure repair and maintenance liabilities; and avoid hazardous or environmentally sensitive open space areas.

Policy 3.17: Ensure that all infill development projects within State Responsibility Areas or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones are required to comply with applicable state or local fire safety and defensible space regulations or standards and any applicable fire protection or risk reduction measures identified in locally adopted plans.

Policy 3.18: Ensure that discretionary infill projects may be required to prepare a project-specific fire hazard and risk assessment and incorporate project-specific risk reduction measures, subject to the determination and approval of the Fire Marshal.

Policy 3.19: Support the continuation of long-term maintenance of fire hazard reduction projects, such as a weed abatement program (existing), community fire breaks, and private and public road clearance.

Policy 3.9: Mandate that proposed development satisfy the minimum structural fire protection standards in the adopted edition of the Uniform Fire and Building Codes; however, where deemed appropriate, the City of Santee shall enhance the minimum standards to provide optimum protection.

Policy 3.10: Increase resilience of existing development in high-risk areas built prior to modern fire safety codes or wildfire hazard mitigation guidance.

Policy 3.12: Provide information regarding defensible space and building retrofits to achieve a lowrisk condition.

Policy 3.14: Require structures with fire protection sprinkler systems to provide for outside alarm notification.

IS/ND 115 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 116 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
Policy 3.20: Ensure that the distribution of fire hydrants and capacity of water lines is adequate through periodic review.

Policy 3.21: Encourage and support the delivery of a high level of emergency services through cooperation with other agencies and use of available financial opportunities.

Policy 3.22: Encourage the continued development, implementation, and public awareness of fire prevention programs.

Policy 3.23: The Santee Fire Department shall continue be involved in the review of development applications to minimize fire hazards. Considerations shall be given to adequate emergency access, driveway widths, turning radii, fire hydrant locations, and needed fire flow requirements.

Policy 3.24: Ensure that the timing of additional fire station construction or renovation (or new services) relates to the rise of service demand in Santee and surrounding areas. Evaluate redevelopment after a large fire.

Policy 3.25: Support mutual aid agreements and communications links with the County of San Diego and the other municipalities participating in the Unified San Diego County Emergency Service Organization.

Compliance with existing regulations and proposed Safety-EJ Element policies would ensure that impacts related to wildfire risk are below significant. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c. Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. The Safety-EJ Element does not propose specific development.

However, future development facilitated under implementation of the Safety-EJ Element may require the installation of new water, emergency water, wastewater, stormwater, and natural gas infrastructure and connections to City infrastructure. Any new infrastructure components would be required to comply with applicable CBC and California Fire Code regulations. Therefore, implementation of the Safety-EJ Element would not exacerbate fire risk or result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d. Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Safety-EJ Element does not propose specific development. Any future development that may be facilitated under implementation of the Safety-EJ Element would be required to adhere to the CBC and other standards and regulations for building designs, which would minimize any potential risks associated with landslides. In addition, future development Policy 3.20: Ensure that the distribution of fire hydrants and capacity of water lines is adequate through periodic review.

Policy 3.21: Encourage and support the delivery of a high level of emergency services through cooperation with other agencies and use of available financial opportunities.

Policy 3.22: Encourage the continued development, implementation, and public awareness of fire prevention programs.

However, future development facilitated under implementation of the Safety-EJ Element may require the installation of new water, emergency water, wastewater, stormwater, and natural gas infrastructure and connections to City infrastructure. Any new infrastructure components would be required to comply with applicable CBC and California Fire Code regulations. Therefore, implementation of the Safety-EJ Element would not exacerbate fire risk or result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d. Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Safety-EJ Element does not propose specific development. Any future development that may be facilitated under implementation of the Safety-EJ Element would be required to adhere to the CBC and other standards and regulations for building designs, which would minimize any potential risks associated with landslides. In addition, future development IS/ND 116 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 117 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
would be subject to City and state drainage and stormwater quality requirements that are designed to reduce stormwater runoff from individual projects sites by promoting infiltration, minimizing impervious surfaces, and requiring LID measures. Therefore, future development would not expose people or structures to significant risk associated with post-fire landslides, mudflows, and flooding.

Mitigation Measures
The analysis completed for this section indicates that no significant impacts would result from implementation of the proposed Safety-EJ Element. As a result, no mitigation measures are required. would be subject to City and state drainage and stormwater quality requirements that are designed to reduce stormwater runoff from individual projects sites by promoting infiltration, minimizing impervious surfaces, and requiring LID measures. Therefore, future development would not expose people or structures to significant risk associated with post-fire landslides, mudflows, and flooding.

IS/ND 117 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 118 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element

2.4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Does the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of
a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c. Have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Note: Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21083.05, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 65088.4, Gov. Code; Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21083, 21083.05, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21095, and 21151, Public Resources Code; Sundstrom v.

County of Mendocino,(1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296; Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors, (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337; Eureka Citizens for Responsible Govt. v. City of Eureka (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 357; Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th at 1109; San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City and County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656.

Impact Analysis
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact. The Safety-EJ Element does not propose specific development.

2.4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Less Than
Potentially | Significant with | Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Does the project: Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the CJ LJ L] quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but LJ LJ L] cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of
a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
c. Have environmental effects which will cause CJ CJ L] substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Note: Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21083.05, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 65088.4, Gov. Code; Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21083, 21083.05, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21095, and 21151, Public Resources Code; Sundstrom v.

Instead, the Safety-EJ Element would identify action programs that could be implemented to provide additional capacity for the City to adapt to hazard- and climate-related changes in the environment. Implementation of the Safety-EJ Element would not directly remove sensitive vegetation communities or species or eliminate cultural resources because the Safety-EJ Element does not propose specific development projects. Development facilitated by the Safety-EJ Element would be subject to compliance with the regulations and guidelines set forth in the Santee General Plan, the update to the General Plan (once approved), Santee Municipal Code, and development review process. Due to the conceptual nature of future development, proposals would require IS/ND 118 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 119 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
project-specific CEQA review, including an assessment of potential impacts to biological and cultural resources. If necessary, additional mitigation would be required to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.

Adoption of the proposed Safety-EJ Element would not significantly degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Therefore, the proposed Safety-EJ Element’s contribution to adverse impacts on wildlife resources, individually or cumulatively, would be less than significant.
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Safety-EJ Element would be a policy document designed to assist the City in future planning. Cumulative impacts associated with development consistent that may be facilitated under implementation of the Safety-EJ Element have been evaluated at a program or policy level. In addition, future development would be required to be consistent with Santee General Plan policies aimed at reducing cumulative impacts. Furthermore, through the City’s environmental review process, future development projects would be evaluated for potential cumulative impacts. Where needed, appropriate mitigation measures would be required to reduce potential impacts. Therefore, the Safety-EJ Element’s contribution to cumulative impacts would be less than significant.
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Safety-EJ Element would consist of an updated determination of public safety and environmental justice needs in Santee and revisions to policies and procedures the City uses in addressing those needs. The Safety-EJ Element would be a policy document designed to assist the City in future planning. The Safety-EJ Element does not propose specific development. Environmental impacts with the potential to adversely affect people that may result from development have been evaluated at a program or policy level. Due to the conceptual nature of future development, future development proposals would require project-specific CEQA review, including an assessment of potential impacts to hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and other environmental topics that would directly or indirectly affect people. Where needed, appropriate mitigation measures would be required to reduce potential impacts. Therefore, impacts associated with adoption of the Safety-EJ Element would be less than significant. project-specific CEQA review, including an assessment of potential impacts to biological and cultural resources. If necessary, additional mitigation would be required to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.

IS/ND 119 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 120 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
Mitigation Measures
The analysis completed for this section indicates that no significant impacts would result from implementation of the proposed Safety-EJ Element. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.

IS/ND 120 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 121 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
This page This page intentionally left blank. intentionally left blank.

IS/ND 121 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 122 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
Section 3 List of Preparers

3.1 Lead Agency
City of Santee
10601 Magnolia Avenue
Santee, California 92071
Christina Rios, Senior Planner

3.2 Consultants
Harris & Associates
600 B Street, Suite 2000
San Diego, California 92101
Diane Sandman, AICP, Principal in Charge
Darin Neufeld, AICP, Project Manager
Kelsey Hawkins, Deputy Project Manager
Michael Rupic, Environmental Analyst
Sydnie Margallo, Environmental Analyst
Randy Deodat, GIS Analyst
Lindsey Messner, Technical Editor
Eija Blocker, Technical Editor
IS/ND
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
122 October 2024
IS/ND 123 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank.

IS/ND 123 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 124 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
Section 4 References
CAL FIRE (California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection). 2019. Fire Threat. Accessed July 2023. https://frap.fire.ca.gov/media/10315/firethreat_19_ada.pdf.

CAL FIRE. 2022. FHSZ Viewer. Accessed July 2023. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/.

California Department of Finance. 2021. “E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2011–2020 with 2010 Census Benchmark.” Accessed July 2023. https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/estimates-e5-2010-2020/.

California Water Boards. 2021. Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin. Accessed July 2023. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sandiego/water_issues/programs/basin_plan/.

CalRecycle. 2019. SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details, Sycamore Landfill (37-AA-0023). Accessed July 2023. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/484?siteID=2871.

Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2011. California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. Accessed July 2023. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/aeronautics/documents/californiaairportlanduseplanninghandbook-a11y.pdf.

California Air Resources Board. 2018. California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory - 2018 Edition. Accessed July 2023. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm City of El Cajon, City of La Mesa, City of San Diego, City of Santee, County of San Diego, California Department of Transportation. 2016. San Diego River Watershed Management Area Water Quality Improvement Plan. Accessed July 2023. https://projectcleanwater. org/download/san-diego-river-sdr-water-quality-improvement-plan-wqip/.

City of Santee. 2003. Santee General Plan. Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/services/development-services/planning-and-zoningservices/general-plan.

City of Santee. 2020. City of Santee Emergency Operations Plan.

City of Santee. 2015. City of Santee Guidelines for Surface Water Pollution Prevention. Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/17964/ 637024042748900000.

City of Santee. 2016. City of Santee BMP Design Manual. Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/8700/636366824217170000.

City of Santee. 2017. City of Santee Mobility Element. Accessed July 2023. https://www .cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/11054/636446327420070000.

City of Santee. 2018. Draft Santee Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan.

Wildlife Agency Review Draft available December 2018.

Section4 References
CAL FIRE (California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection). 2019. Fire Threat. Accessed July 2023. https://frap.fire.ca.gov/media/10315/firethreat_19 ada.pdf.

CAL FIRE. 2022. FHSZ Viewer. Accessed July 2023. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/.

California Department of Finance. 2021. ““E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 201 1—2020 with 2010 Census Benchmark.” Accessed July 2023. https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/estimates-e5-2010-2020/.

California Water Boards. 2021. Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin. Accessed July 2023. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sandiego/water_issues/programs/basin_plan/.

CalRecycle. 2019. SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details, Sycamore Landfill (37-AA-0023). Accessed July 2023. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteA ctivity/Details/484?siteID=2871.

City of Santee. 2003. Santee General Plan. Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/services/development-services/planning-and-zoningservices/general-plan.

City of Santee. 2020. City of Santee Emergency Operations Plan.

City of Santee. 2015. City of Santee Guidelines for Surface Water Pollution Prevention. Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/17964/ 637024042748900000.

City of Santee. 2016. City of Santee BMP Design Manual. Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/8700/6363668242 17170000.

City of Santee. 2017. City of Santee Mobility Element. Accessed July 2023. https://www .cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/1 1054/636446327420070000.

City of Santee. 2018. Draft Santee Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan.

Wildlife Agency Review Draft available December 2018.

IS/ND 124 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 125 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
City of Santee. 2019. Sustainable Santee Plan. Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showdocument?id=18422.

City of Santee. 2021. Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program. Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/8379/637751838225770000.

City of Santee. 2022a. “Department Overview.” Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/government/fire-department/department-overview.

City of Santee. 2022b. “Reduce, Reuse & Recycle.” Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/services/solid-waste-recycling-services.

City of Santee. 2022c. “City of Santee Housing Element Sixth Cycle 2021 -2029.” May 11, 2022.

Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/ 8551/638066250344200000.

City of Santee. 2022d. City of Santee VMT Analysis Guidelines. April 13, 2022.

County of San Diego. 2009. County of San Diego Guidelines for Determining Significance of Paleontological Resources. Land Use and Environment Group, Department of Planning and Land Use, Department of Public Works.

County of San Diego. 2012. Public Roads Standards. Accessed July 2023. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/pds/ceqa/Soitec-Documents/Final-EIRFiles/references/rtcref/ch3.1.8/2014-12- 19_CountyofSanDiego2012_PublicRoadStandards.pdf.

County of San Diego. 2014. Low Impact Development Handbook: Stormwater Management Strategies. Accessed July 2023.
https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/dpw/WATERSHED_PROTECTION_PR OGRAM/susmppdf/lid_chapters_1-4.pdf.

County of San Diego. 2022. Transportation Study Guidelines. Accessed July 2023. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/pds/SB743/Transportation%20Study%20 Guide%20-%20FINAL%20-%20September%202022.pdf.

DOC (California Department of Conservation). 2016. California Important Farmland Finder.

Accessed July 2023. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/.

DTSC (California Department of Toxic Substances Control). 2022. EnviroStor. Accessed July 2023. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search?CMD=search&ocieerp=& HWMP=False&business_name=&main_street_name=&city=santee&zip=&county=&censustr act=&case_number=&apn=&Search=Get+Report.

DWR (California Department of Water Resources). 2022. SGMA Basin Prioritization Dashboard.

Accessed July 2023. https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/bp-dashboard/final/.

East County Advanced Water Purification. 2022. “Welcome.” Accessed July 2023. https://eastcountyawp.com/.

City of Santee. 2019. Sustainable Santee Plan. Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showdocument?id=18422.

City of Santee. 2021. Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program. Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/8379/63775 1838225770000.

City of Santee. 2022a. “Department Overview.” Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/government/fire-department/department-overview.

City of Santee. 2022b. “Reduce, Reuse & Recycle.” Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/services/solid-waste-recycling-services.

City of Santee. 2022c. “City of Santee Housing Element Sixth Cycle 2021 -2029.” May 11, 2022.

Accessed July 2023. https://www.cityofsanteeca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/ 855 1/638066250344200000.

City of Santee. 2022d. City of Santee VMT Analysis Guidelines. April 13, 2022.

County of San Diego. 2014. Low Impact Development Handbook: Stormwater Management Strategies. Accessed July 2023.
https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/dpw/WATERSHED PROTECTION PR OGRAM/susmppdf/lid_chapters_1-4.pdf.

DOC (California Department of Conservation). 2016. California Important Farmland Finder.

Accessed July 2023. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/.

DTSC (California Department of Toxic Substances Control). 2022. EnviroStor. Accessed July 2023. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search?CMD=search&ocieerp=& HWMpP-=False&business name=&main_street_name=&city=santee&zip=&county=&censustr act=&case_number=&apn=&Search=Get+Report.

DWR (California Department of Water Resources). 2022. SGMA Basin Prioritization Dashboard.

Accessed July 2023. https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/bp-dashboard/final/.

East County Advanced Water Purification. 2022. “Welcome.” Accessed July 2023. https://eastcountyawp.com/.

IS/ND 125 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 126 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
Geocon, Inc. 2021. Geotechnical/Seismic Hazard Study for the Safety Element of the Santee General Plan. Prepared for the City of Santee. March 29.

IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Fifth Assessment – Climate Change Synthesis Report. Accessed July 2023. https://archive.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ Padre Dam (Padre Dam Municipal Water District). 2020. Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed July 2023. https://www.padredam.org/397/5035/Urban-Water-ManagementPlan#:~:text=Padre%20Dam’s%20Urban%20Water%20Management,%2C%20and%20mult iple%2Ddry%20years.

Padre Dam. 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed July 2023. https://www. padredam.org/DocumentCenter/View/5620/2020-Urban-Water-Management-Plan.

Padre Dam. 2022. “Your Water.” Accessed July 2023. https://www.padredam.org/35/Your-Water.

San Diego County Airport Land Use Commission. 2010. Gillespie Field Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Accessed July 2023.
http://sntbberry.cityofsanteeca.gov/sites/FanitaRanch/Public/Remainder%20of%20the%20R ecord/(2)%20Reference%20Documents%20from%20EIR%20&%20Technical%20Reports/ Tab%20302%20-%202010-12-20%20SDCRAA%202010_Gillespie%20Field %20Airport%20Land%20Use%20Compatibility%20Plan.pdf.

SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments). 2021. 2050 Regional Growth Forecast.

Accessed July 2023. https://www.sandag.org/uploads/2050RTP/F2050RTPTA2.pdf.

SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board). 2021. “2018 Integrated Report Map.” Accessed July 2023. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ water_quality_assessment/2018_integrated_report/2018IR_map.html.

Geocon, Inc. 2021. Geotechnical/Seismic Hazard Study for the Safety Element of the Santee General Plan. Prepared for the City of Santee. March 29.

IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Fifth Assessment — Climate Change Synthesis Report. Accessed July 2023. https://archive.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ Padre Dam (Padre Dam Municipal Water District). 2020. Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed July 2023. https://www.padredam.org/397/5035/Urban-Water-ManagementPlan#:~:text=Padre%20Dam’s%20Urban%20Water%20Management,%2C%20and%20mult iple%2Ddry%o20years.

Padre Dam. 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed July 2023. https://www. padredam.org/DocumentCenter/View/5620/2020-Urban- Water-Management-Plan.

Padre Dam. 2022. “Your Water.” Accessed July 2023. https://www.padredam.org/35/Y our-Water.

San Diego County Airport Land Use Commission. 2010. Gillespie Field Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Accessed July 2023.
http://sntbberry.cityofsanteeca. gov/sites/FanitaRanch/Public/Remainder™200f%20the%20R ecord/(2)%20Reference%20Documents%20from%20EIR%20&%20Technical%20Reports/ Tab%20302%20-%202010-12-20%20SDCRAA%202010_ Gillespie%20Field %20Airport%20Land%20Use%20Compatibility%20Plan.pdf.

SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments). 2021. 2050 Regional Growth Forecast.

Accessed July 2023. https://www.sandag.org/uploads/2050RTP/F2050RTPTA2.pdf.

SWRCEB (State Water Resources Control Board). 2021. “2018 Integrated Report Map.” Accessed July 2023. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ water quality _assessment/2018 integrated_report/2018IR_map.html.

IS/ND 126 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
IS/ND 127 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element
This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank.

IS/ND 127 October 2024
City of Santee Safety-Environmental Justice Element

Santee City CouncilMay 14, 2025

Santee City Council
May 14, 2025