Seal Beach City Council
February 23, 2026

wheelchairs are used more than 100 days per year. The addition of a powered wheelchair will significantly improve independent access for beachgoers with disabilities.

Upon completion of the purchases and installation, the Marine Safety Department will host a Grand Opening event in Spring 2026 to highlight the improvements and acknowledge grant partners.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

There is no environmental impact related to this item.

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

The City Attorney has approved the agreement and resolution as to form.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The total grant award is $47,897.33. The project is expected to remain within the awarded amount.

Budget Amendment BA #26-08-02
Description Account Revised/Adopted
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Budget (diff)
Amendment
Grant
Reimbursement
Beach/Coast
Accessibility
Program
217-230-
0381-42400
$ - $ 47,897.33 $ 47,897.33
Contract
ProfessionalBeach and
Coast Access
217-230-
0381-51280
$ - $ 47,897.33 $ 47,897.33
STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is not applicable to the Strategic Plan.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt Resolution 7741:

1. Accepting an award of grant funds in the amount of $47,897.33 from the Orange County Coastkeeper and the California Coastal Conservancy; and,

2. Authorizing the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the grant agreement, including any amendments and related documents, and to take all actions necessary to secure the grant funds and implement the approved grant; and,

3. Approving Budget Amendment BA #26-08-02 in the amount of $47,897.33.

SUBMITTED BY: NOTED AND APPROVED:

Joe Bailey Patrick Gallegos
Joe Bailey, Marine Safety Chief Patrick Gallegos, City Manager ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution 7741
B. Beach and Coast Accessibility Program Contract
RESOLUTION 7741

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SEAL BEACH ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $47,897.33 FROM THE ORANGE

COUNTY COASTKEEPER AND THE CALIFORNIA

COASTAL CONSERVANCY AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER, OR THEIR DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE

THE GRANT AGREEMENT AND RELATED
DOCUMENTS; AND APPROVING BUDGET
AMENDMENT #26-08-02 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$47,897.33
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach is committed to enhancing public access to its beaches and recreational resources for all members of the community, including individuals with mobility limitations; and, WHEREAS, the Marine Safety Department applied for and was awarded grant funding from the Orange County Coastkeeper and the California Coastal Conservancy to improve beach accessibility; and,
WHEREAS, the grant funds will be used to purchase and install beach access mats at the First Street beach area and to acquire a powered track beach wheelchair to improve independent access for beachgoers with disabilities; and, WHEREAS, the total amount of the grant award is $47,897.33, and the project is expected to be completed within the awarded amount with no additional City funds required; and,
WHEREAS, the City Attorney has reviewed and approved the grant agreement and this resolution as to form; and,
WHEREAS, acceptance of the grant funds and execution of the grant agreement will support the City of Seal Beach’s efforts to improve accessibility and enhance public use of coastal resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Seal Beach City Council does resolve, declare, determine, and order as follows:

Section 1. The City Council hereby accepts grant funds in the amount of $47,897.33 from the Orange County Coastkeeper and the
California Coastal Conservancy.

Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or Their designee, to execute the grant agreement and any amendments thereto, as well as all related documents, and to take all actions necessary to secure the grant funds and implement the approved grant.

Section 3. The City Council hereby approves Budget Amendment BA #26-08- 02 in the amount of $47,897.33.

Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of February 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members
NOES: Council Members
ABSENT: Council Members
ABSTAIN: Council Members

Lisa Landau, Mayor
ATTEST:

Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
I, Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution 7741 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of February 2026.

Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk
3151 Airway Ave, Suite F-110
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
714-850-1965
www.coastkeeper.org
Orange County Coastkeeper
Beach and Coast
Accessibility Program
Contract with the City of Seal Beach
Genesee Ouyang
12-11-2025
Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 1 1. Introduction: This Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into on this 11 th of December
2025 by and between: Orange County Coastkeeper (referred to as “OCCK”), a California nonprofit corporation with its principal office located at 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite F-110, Costa Mesa, CA 92626, and the City of Seal Beach (referred to as the “Sub-Grantee”), a public agency, with its principal office located at 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach, CA 90740.

2. Background:
•Whereas, OCCK has entered into a Grant Agreement (Grant Agreement No. 24-073) with the State Coastal Conservancy (the “Conservancy”), whereby OCCK has received a grant to manage and implement the California coast-wide Beach and Coastal Accessibility Program (the “Program”);
•Whereas, the Program aims to provide grants to nonprofit organizations, public entities, and tribes for the purchase of equipment to improve beach and coast accessibility for people with disabilities;
•Whereas, OCCK has selected the Sub-Grantee to receive funds under the Program to carry out certain activities related to the purchase and maintenance of beach accessibility equipment, as described in this Agreement;
Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:

3. Scope of Work:

3.1. The Sub-Grantee agrees to implement the scope of work (the “Scope of Work”) as detailed in Exhibit 2, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

The Scope of Work outlines the specific tasks, activities, and deliverables that the SubGrantee is responsible for under this Agreement. The Sub-Grantee shall carry out the Scope of Work in a timely and professional manner, in accordance with the terms of this agreement.

The Sub-Grantee agrees to use the grant funds exclusively for the activities and purposes described in the Scope of Work.

3.2. Any modifications to the Scope of Work must be approved in writing by OCCK before implementation. Such modifications must also be consistent with the Grant Agreement and approved by the Conservancy if required.

3.3. The Sub-Grantee shall ensure that all work performed under this Agreement complies with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and standards.

4. Grant Funds and Disbursement:

4.1. OCCK agrees to provide the Sub-Grantee with grant funds in an amount not to exceed Twenty-Nine Thousand and Eight-Hundred and Ninety-Seven Dollars and ThirtyDocusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 2 Three Cents ($29,897.33). These funds are provided exclusively for the implementation of the Scope of Work as described in Exhibit 2.

4.2. Disbursement Schedule: Disbursements to the Sub-Grantee will be made on a reimbursement basis within sixty (60) days of receipt of the documents described in the subsequent paragraph 4.3.

4.3. Condition Precedent to Disbursement: The following conditions must be met before any disbursement of funds to the Sub-Grantee:

1. Proof of Insurance: The Sub-Grantee must provide OCCK with proof of insurance as required under Section 11 of this Agreement.

2. Approval of Scope of Work: The Scope of Work (Exhibit 2) must be approved in writing by OCCK.

3. Invoice: Sub-Grantee must provide OCCK with an invoice that includes all costs for which Sub-Grantee is seeking reimbursement.

4. Receipts: Sub-Grantee must provide OCCK with all receipts related to purchases within the Scope of Work.

5. Photographs: Sub-Grantee must provide OCCK with photographs sufficient to show completion of the Scope of Work.

4.4. Use of Funds: The Sub-Grantee agrees to use the grant funds solely for the purposes set forth in the Scope of Work. None of the grant funds may be spent on indirect costs.

Any equipment purchased with funds from this Agreement must be located and made available for use within the State of California for the equipment’s useful life. Any expenditure of funds for purposes other than those authorized under this Agreement is prohibited and may result in the termination of this Agreement and the requirement to return disbursed funds.

5. Reporting Requirements:

5.1. Progress Reports: The Sub-Grantee shall submit written progress reports to OCCK within thirty (30) days of the Sub-Grantee’s receipt of purchased equipment, and then annually for five (5) years until the final report, or as otherwise directed by OCCK. Each progress report shall include:

5.1.1. Summary of Activities: A detailed description of the activities undertaken during the reporting period, including progress made towards completing the Scope of Work (Exhibit 2).

5.1.2. Financial Report: An itemized account of expenditures made using the grant funds during the reporting period, including receipts and documentation as necessary to support the reported costs.

Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 3 5.1.3. Equipment Report: A description of the condition of the equipment and its viable use, how many users use the equipment, and the equipment’s location.

5.2. Final Report: Upon completion of the project, and no later than sixty (60) days after the project’s end date (5 years after receiving equipment), the Sub-Grantee shall submit a final report to OCCK. The final report shall include:

5.2.1. Comprehensive Summary: A complete summary of the project’s activities, outcomes, and achievements, including how the project met the objectives outlined in the Scope of Work (Exhibit 2).

5.2.2. Final Financial Report: A full accounting of all grant funds expended, including a comparison of the budgeted vs. actual expenditures, along with final receipts and documentation for all costs.

5.2.3. Evaluation and Impact: An assessment of the project’s impact, including feedback from beneficiaries, any lessons learned, and recommendations for future projects.

5.2.4. Documentation: Any relevant documentation produced as part of the project, including photos, videos, promotional materials, and media coverage, if applicable.

5.3. Additional Reports: OCCK reserves the right to request additional reports or information from the Sub-Grantee as needed to ensure compliance with the terms of this Agreement.

5.4. Record Retention: The Sub-Grantee shall retain all project-related records, including financial documents, for a minimum of three (3) years following the completion of the project. These records must be made available for audit or inspection by OCCK, the Conservancy, or other authorized entities upon request.

5.5. Non-Compliance: Failure to submit the required reports in a timely and complete manner may result in OCCK seeking recovery of grant funds, termination of this Agreement, or other actions as deemed appropriate by OCCK.

6. Monitoring and Evaluation

6.1. Evaluation: OCCK reserves the right to monitor and evaluate the Sub-Grantee’s performance under this Agreement. This may include site visits, review of projectrelated documentation, and interviews with staff and beneficiaries to ensure compliance with the Scope of Work (Exhibit 2) and the terms of this Agreement. The Sub-Grantee’s performance will be evaluated based on the timely completion of project milestones, adherence to the Scope of Work (Exhibit 2), effective use of grant funds, and the impact of the project in improving beach and coastal accessibility.

6.2. Corrective Action: If OCCK determines that the Sub-Grantee is not in compliance with the terms of this Agreement or the Scope of Work (Exhibit 2), OCCK may require the Sub-Grantee to take corrective action within a specified timeframe. Failure to take corrective action may result in OCCK seeking recovery of grant funds, termination of this Agreement, or other actions as deemed appropriate by OCCK.

7. Equipment Maintenance:

Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 4 The Sub-Grantee agrees that all equipment purchased under this Agreement shall be maintained and kept in good repair for a minimum period of five (5) years from the date of acquisition. Given the challenges posed by sand, wind, and salt water, the Sub-Grantee may allocate grant funds for the purchase of replacement components that have been shown, through previous experience, to require regular replacement due to wear and tear.

Additionally, if necessary, the Sub-Grantee may use grant funds to purchase locked storage for the equipment to ensure its safekeeping. The Sub-Grantee shall monitor and document the usage of the equipment, providing such documentation to OCCK and the Conservancy to quantify the program’s impact on coast and beach access. The Sub-Grantee shall include these updates in its periodic reports as required under Section 4 of this Agreement.

8. Information Dissemination Plan:

The Sub-Grantee shall develop and implement a plan for disseminating information about the availability of the accessibility equipment to target communities and organizations. This plan shall include strategies to ensure that people with disabilities are made aware of the equipment and can readily access and use it. The Sub-Grantee shall include updates on the implementation of this plan in its progress reports to OCCK.

9. Work Products and Acknowledgement of Conservancy Support:

9.1. All material, data, information, and written, graphic or other work produced, developed or acquired under this agreement is subject to the unqualified and unconditional right of the Conservancy and OCCK to use, reproduce, publish, display, and make derivative use of all such work, or any part of it, free of charge and in any manner and for any purpose; and to authorize others to do so. If any of the work is subject to copyright, trademark, service mark, or patent, the Conservancy and OCCK are granted and shall have a perpetual, royalty-free, nonexclusive and irrevocable license to use, reproduce, publish, use in the creation of derivative works, and display and perform the work, or any part of it, and to grant to any third party a comparable and coextensive sublicense.

9.2. The Sub-Grantee shall not utilize the work produced under this agreement for any profitmaking venture.

9.3. To acknowledge the Conservancy’s support of the project, the grantee shall display the Conservancy’s name and logo in the final report in a prominent location. The grantee shall mention the Conservancy’s support in its project-related press releases, contacts with the media, and social media postings, and on its website.

10. Audits and Accounting:

10.1. Accounting Standards: The Sub-Grantee shall maintain financial accounts, documents, and records (collectively, the “Records”) relating to this Agreement in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) as published by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The Records shall include, without limitation, evidence sufficient to reflect properly the amount, receipt, and disbursement of all funds related to work performed under this Agreement, as well as time and effort Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 5 reports that permit tracing from the request for disbursement forms to the accounting records and to the supporting documentation.

10.2. Audit Rights: OCCK, the State Coastal Conservancy, the California State Auditor, or their authorized representatives, shall have the right to review, obtain, and copy all Records maintained by the Sub-Grantee related to this Agreement. The Sub-Grantee agrees to provide any relevant information requested and shall grant access to its premises upon reasonable notice during normal business hours to interview employees and inspect and copy books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to determining compliance with this Agreement and any applicable laws and regulations.

10.3. Record Retention: The Sub-Grantee shall retain the Records for a minimum of three (3) years following the final disbursement of funds by OCCK under this Agreement. The Records shall be subject to examination and audit by OCCK, the State Coastal Conservancy, and the California State Auditor during this retention period.

10.4. Disallowance of Costs: OCCK may disallow all or part of the cost of any activity or action that it determines to be not in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement or the Grant Agreement with the State Coastal Conservancy.

11. Insurance:

11.1. Insurance Requirements: Throughout the term of this Agreement, the Sub-Grantee shall procure and maintain insurance coverage as specified in this section, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of work under this Agreement by the Sub-Grantee, its agents, representatives, employees, or contractors.

11.2. Types and Limits of Insurance: The Sub-Grantee shall maintain the following minimum insurance coverage:

1. Commercial General Liability Insurance: Coverage with limits of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage.

If a general aggregate limit is used, the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work under this Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability Insurance: Coverage with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage, covering any auto.

3. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance: Worker’s compensation insurance as required by the laws of the State of California, with Employer’s Liability limits of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

11.3. Additional Insured: The Sub-Grantee shall ensure that the insurance policies required under this Agreement name Orange County Coastkeeper (OCCK), the State Coastal Conservancy (the “Conservancy”), and the State of California, its officers, agents, and employees as additional insureds. The coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to OCCK, the Conservancy, and the State of California, its officers, agents, and employees and not contributing with any insurance or self-insurance maintained by Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 6 OCCK or the Conservancy. The limits of the additional insured coverage must equal the limits of the named insured coverage regardless of whether the limits of the named insurance coverage exceed those limits required by this agreement.

11.4. Compliance with Original Grant Agreement between OCCK and the Conservancy:

11.4.1. Required Provisions Concerning the Conservancy and the State of California:

11.4.1.1. The Sub-Grantee shall notify OCCK within two (2) days of receipt of notice that any required insurance policy will lapse or be canceled. At least ten (10) days before an insurance policy held by the grantee lapses or is cancelled, the grantee shall provide the OCCK with evidence of renewal or replacement of the policy.

11.4.1.2. The grantee hereby grants to the State of California, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of the grantee may acquire against the State of California, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Sub-Grantee agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the Sub-Grantee has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

11.4.1.3. Coverage does not extend to any indemnity coverage for the active negligence of the additional insured in any case where an agreement to indemnify the additional insured would be invalid under Subdivision (b) of Section 2782 of the Civil Code.

11.4.1.4. Insurance must be placed with insurers admitted to transact business in the State of California and having a current Best’s rating of “B+:VII” or better or, in the alternative, acceptable to the Conservancy and approved in writing by the Executive Officer.

11.5. Proof of Insurance: Prior to the commencement of any work under this Agreement, the Sub-Grantee shall provide OCCK with certificates of insurance and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this section. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by OCCK before work commences. OCCK reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage, at any time.

11.6. Continuation of Coverage: The Sub-Grantee shall ensure that all insurance coverage required under this Agreement remains in effect for the duration of the project and for a period of at least three (3) years following the completion of the project.

12. Governing Law
Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 7 This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflict of law principles. The Sub-Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances in carrying out the activities under this Agreement.

13. Compliance with Laws:

13.1. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): By signing this Agreement, the SubGrantee certifies that it is in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA.

13.2. Non-Discrimination: During the performance of this Agreement, the Sub-Grantee shall not deny the Agreement’s benefits to any person on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status, nor shall it discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of such characteristics. The Sub-Grantee shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination. The SubGrantee shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12900 et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §11000 et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code (Gov. Code §§11135-11139.5), and the regulations or standards adopted by the State Coastal Conservancy to implement such article. The SubGrantee shall permit access by representatives of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and OCCK upon reasonable notice at any time during the normal business hours, but in no case less than 24 hours’ notice, to such of its books, records, accounts, and all other sources of information and its facilities as the Department or OCCK shall require to ascertain compliance with this clause. The Sub-Grantee shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all contracts to perform work under this Agreement.

13.3. Copyright Laws: The Sub-Grantee certifies that it has instituted and will employ systems and controls appropriate to ensure that, in the performance of this contract, state funds will not be used for the acquisition, operation, or maintenance of computer software in violation of copyright laws.

13.4. Executive Order N-6-22 – Russia Sanctions: On March 4, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-6-22 (the EO) regarding Economic Sanctions against Russia and Russian entities and individuals. “Economic Sanctions” refers to sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, as well as any sanctions imposed under state law. The EO directs state agencies to terminate contracts with, and to refrain from entering any new contracts with, individuals or Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 8 entities that are determined to be a target of Economic Sanctions. Accordingly, should the Conservancy determine the Sub-Grantee is a target of Economic Sanctions or is conducting prohibited transactions with sanctioned individuals or entities, that shall be grounds for termination of this agreement. OCCK shall provide the Sub-Grantee advance written notice of such termination, allowing the Sub-Grantee at least 30 calendar days to provide a written response. Termination shall be at the sole discretion of the Conservancy.

14. Indemnification:

The Sub-Grantee shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless OCCK, the State Coastal Conservancy, and their respective officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of this Agreement by the Sub-Grantee, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, or subcontractors, except to the extent caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of OCCK or the State Coastal Conservancy. The obligations under this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

15. Termination:

15.1. Termination for Cause: OCCK may terminate this Agreement for cause upon providing written notice to the Sub-Grantee if the Sub-Grantee fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, misuses grant funds, or otherwise breaches any term of this Agreement. The Sub-Grantee shall have 30 days to cure any such breach unless OCCK determines that the breach is not curable.

15.2. Termination for Convenience: OCCK may terminate this Agreement for convenience at any time by providing the Sub-Grantee with 10 days’ written notice. In the event of termination for convenience, OCCK shall reimburse the Sub-Grantee for all eligible expenses incurred up to the effective date of termination.

15.3. Effect of Termination: Upon termination of this Agreement, the Sub-Grantee shall immediately cease all work under the Agreement, and shall return any unspent grant funds to OCCK within 30 days. The Sub-Grantee shall also submit a final report detailing all activities and expenditures up to the date of termination. The parties expressly agree to waive, release, and relinquish the recovery of any consequential damages that may arise out of the termination or suspension of this agreement under this section.

16. Miscellaneous Provisions:

16.1. Dispute Resolution: In an effort to resolve any conflicts that may arise during the Agreement or following project completion, sub-grantee and OCCK agree that all disputes between them arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be submitted to non-binding mediation unless the parties mutually agree otherwise.

16.2. Assignment: The Sub-Grantee shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of OCCK, and if required, the Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 9 Conservancy. Any unauthorized assignment shall be void and may result in the termination of this Agreement.

16.3. Amendments: No change, amendment, or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless it is in writing and signed by both parties. Oral agreements or understandings not incorporated in this Agreement shall not be binding on either party.

16.4. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

16.5. Entire Agreement: This Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior agreements, negotiations, and understandings, whether written or oral, with respect to the subject matter hereof.

16.6. Notices: All notices required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given when delivered in person, sent by email with receipt confirmed, or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses of the parties set forth in this Agreement or to such other address as a party may designate by notice to the other party.

16.7. Prevailing Wage: Work done under this sub-grant agreement may be subject to the prevailing wage and other related requirements of the California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, sections 1720-1861. If required by law to do so, the grantee shall pay prevailing wage to all persons employed in the performance of any part of the project and otherwise comply with all associated requirements and obligations.

16.8. Independent Capacity: The sub-grantee, and the agents and employees of the subgrantee, in the performance of this agreement, are acting in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of the State of California or OCCK.

16.9. Timeliness: Time is of the essence in this Agreement.

16.10. Drug-Free Workplace: The Sub-Grantee’s signature on this Agreement constitutes the certification required by Government Code Section 8355 (Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990), which requires that all state grantees provide a drug-free workplace by doing all of the following:

16.10.1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the person’s or organization’s workplace and specifying actions that will be taken against employees for violations of the prohibition.

16.10.2. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about all of the following:

16.10.2.1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace.

16.10.2.2. The person’s or organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace.

16.10.2.3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs.

Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 10 16.10.2.4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.

16.10.3. Requiring that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the drug-free workplace statement and that, as a condition of employment on the grant, the employee agrees to abide by the terms of the statement.

Date: Date:

Name: Name:

Signature: Signature:

City of Seal Beach Orange County Coastkeeper
Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 Patrick Gallegos
1/22/2026 | 7:53 PM PST 1/23/2026 | 10:04 AM PST
Garry Brown

BCAP SAMPLE WORK PLAN
I. SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 Project Management
Purchase and install Beach Access Mats on the 1st street beach.

Task Deliverable(s): 1. Receive three bids and purchase Beach Mats

2. Install new Beach Mats

3. Hold press conference and grand opening of new beach mats and new tracked wheelchair
Task 2 Planning, Development, and Outreach
Planning has been completed. We identified the need for better beach access in the 1st street area, to complement our beach access mats on the 8th and 10th street beach.

Outreach will be through the City hall, Police Department and Marine Safety social media outlets. Additionally we will send a press release to the local Seal Beach newspaper.

Task Deliverable(s): copy of RFP promotion materials.

Task 3 Equipment
Beach Access Mat at 1st Street Beach
Task Deliverable(s): Invoices or receipts. Once the contracts are signed, we will purchase and install the new mats.

Task 4 Reporting and Assessment
We will post on the city's social media outlets and website pages and submit annual reports to Coastkeepers.

Task Deliverable(s): Copies of each report, summary reports, and photographs with photo credit and permission for use/publication as possible.

Exhibit 2: Subgrantee work plan
Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 II. SCHEDULE
Work Completion Date: 3/31/2026
Final Progress Report: 3/31/2031
Grant Termination Date: 3/31/2031
Task
Number
Task Title Deliverables: Estimated Start
Date
Estimated
Completion Date
1 Project Management Invoices, Progress Reports.

Press conference and grand
opening.

Upon receipt of
the final
contract
Monthly
throughout the
contract term
2 Planning, Development,
Outreach
Copy of Outreach Materials February 2026 Annually for 5 years
3 Equipment Invoices, Receipts End of 2025 February 2026 4 Reporting and Assessment Reports and Summaries
III. BUDGET OVERVIEW
Task # Task Total
1 Project Management: $0
2 Planning, Development, and Outreach $0
3 Equipment
575 feet of Beach Access Mats
Vendor: AccessRec
$29,897.33
4 Reporting and Assessment: $0
5 Direct Expenditures $29,897.33

5.1 Supplies and Printing $0

5.2 Vehicle/Travel Costs $0
Total $29,897.33
Docusign Envelope ID: C79ADCB6-05D1-47C9-8E67-DD6682A0EE82 Agenda Item I

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 23, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
THRU: Patrick Gallegos, City Manager
FROM: Michael Henderson, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Approve the Purchase of Ammunition for Police Rifles Pursuant to the City’s “Military Equipment” Use Policy and State Law
________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF REQUEST:

That the City Council adopt Resolution 7742 to approve the purchase of .223 /

5.56mm ammunition for the Seal Beach Police Department (SBPD), pursuant to the City’s “military equipment” use policy.

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:

The Seal Beach City Council adopted Ordinance 1694, approving a “military equipment” use policy, in April, 2022. This policy complies with Government Code sections 7070 through 7075 (AB 481) and requires the Police Department to obtain approval from the City Council prior to acquiring equipment that is covered by the policy.

Under state law, once the City has adopted a compliant policy, law enforcement agencies are required to obtain approval from their respective governing body prior to funding, seeking funding, or acquiring “military equipment.” Law enforcement agencies are not permitted to use “military equipment,” as defined in state law, unless it is permitted by the policy. Law enforcement agencies are further required to submit an annual military equipment report to the governing body for as long as the equipment is available for use. Agencies are also required to attach a military equipment inventory to the policy. As stated above, Seal Beach has adopted a policy with the required inventory (see Attachment C).

Items deemed to be “military equipment” by AB 481 are used as a component of overall best practices for law enforcement agencies throughout the country. These tools have been tested in the field and are used by law enforcement agencies to enhance citizen and officer safety. Loss of these items would jeopardize the welfare of citizens and peace officers within the SBPD.

The term “military equipment”, as used in AB 481, does not necessarily indicate equipment that has been used by the military. Pursuant to AB 481, items deemed to be “military equipment” include, but are not limited to, unmanned aerial or ground vehicles, armored vehicles, command and control vehicles, pepper balls, less lethal shotguns, less lethal 40mm projectile launchers, long range acoustic devices, and flashbangs.

SBPD is committed to using the most advanced tools and equipment to safeguard the citizens of Seal Beach and peace officers. Many items deemed to be “military equipment” by AB 481 are employed by SBPD and law enforcement agencies across the country to specifically reduce risk to community members and to protect peace officers with adequate weapons and supplies. Some of the items covered by the policy provide peace officers with the ability to safely resolve volatile situations which otherwise escalate to a lethal force encounter. To that end, the ammunition that SBPD seeks approval to acquire is approved in the policy and will provide SBPD peace officers with vital tools that facilitate compliance with its stringent use of force policy.

There are no reasonable alternatives to the ammunition requested in this report.

SBPD officers are currently equipped and trained with the use of rifles. SBPD needs additional ammunition for ongoing operation, training, qualification, and reserve supplies. The approved use and necessity for use of this ammunition is described in the policy as follows:

Specialized firearms and ammunition including assault weapons: Patrol rifles, Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) rifles, and sniper rifles enable officers when in compliance with the SBPD’s Use of Force Policy, to address medium to long distance threats, or those threats who are heavily armed, armored or both. Further, in both short and long-distance deployments, they allow officers precision shot placement minimizing the risk to officers and innocent citizens. There are no known alternatives to these weapons that will provide the same level of distance or precision.

SBPD will provide an annual update to the policy and inventory, as required by AB 481, at a future meeting.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

There is no environmental impact related to this item.

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

The City Attorney has reviewed and approved as to form.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The City of Seal Beach has been purchasing ammunition from Dooly Enterprise Inc., the sole source distributor for Winchester ammunition on the West Coast, for more than 20 years. The purchase is exempt from bidding requirements under Seal Beach Municipal Code Section 3.20.025(B). The cost for these rounds will be:

10.00 Units (1,000 rounds per unit) = 10,000 total rounds Total Cost $5,107.35 This is a budgeted item for the Police Department.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is not applicable to the Strategic Plan.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt Resolution XXXX to approve the purchase of .223 /

5.56mm ammunition for the Seal Beach Police Department (SBPD), pursuant to the City’s “military equipment” use policy.

SUBMITTED BY: NOTED AND APPROVED:

Michael Henderson Patrick Gallegos
Michael Henderson, Chief of Police Patrick Gallegos, City Manager Prepared by: Michael Ezroj, Operations Bureau Captain
ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution 7742
B. Ordinance 1694
C. Policy 706
D. Dooley Enterprise Inc. Price Quote
RESOLUTION 7742

A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL

APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AMMUNITION PURSUANT
TO THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH’S MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
POLICY
WHEREAS, The City Council approved a “military equipment” use policy in April 2022 by adopting Ordinance 1694, pursuant to the requirement of state law; and, WHEREAS, Ordinance 1694 requires the approval of City Council for the Seal Beach Police Department to purchase ammunitions less than .50 caliber for the department’s service rifles; and,
WHEREAS, The City Council hereby approves purchase of this ammunition which is consistent with the policy and will provide peace officers with the proper tools for training and use.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Seal Beach City Council does resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:

Section 1. The purchase of 10.0 units (1000 rounds per unit) of .223 / 5.56mm ammunition by the Seal Beach Police Department is approved, pursuant to Ordinance 1694.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of February 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members
NOES: Council Members
ABSENT: Council Members
ABSTAIN: Council Members

Lisa Landau, Mayor
ATTEST:

Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
I, Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution 7742 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of February 2026.

Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk

Policy
706
Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 1
Military Equipment
706.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, reporting requirements, and use of military equipment (California Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072). This policy is provided to fulfill the obligations set forth in Assembly Bill No. 481, enacting the foregoing Code sections. These obligations include, but are not limited, to seeking approval for the use and acquisition of specific items deemed to be military equipment, and requirements related to compliance, annual reporting, cataloging, and complaints regarding these items.
706.1.1 DEFINITION OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT
California Government Code § 7070 defines "military equipment" as including:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code §30515, with the exception of standard-issue handguns.
• Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).
• Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 2
706.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Seal Beach Police Department that members of this Department shall comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071, et seq., with respect to military equipment. It is the policy of the Seal Beach Police Department that there shall be legally enforceable safeguards, including transparency, oversight, and accountability measures in place to protect the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties before military equipment is funded, acquired, or used. 706.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police designates the Support Services Bureau Lieutenant to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include, but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the City Council for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, and/or military equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the City Council.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all Department military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Seal Beach Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting, which includes:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the Department's funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the Department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Coordinating the processing of complaints and concerns submitted pursuant to Section 706.7 of this policy.
706.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE CONSIDERATIONS
The military equipment acquired and authorized by the Department is:
(a) Necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
(b) Reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

Military equipment shall only be used by a Department employee after the employee has received the training specified herein, any course required by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST), has been successfully completed, unless exigent circumstances arise.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 3
706.5 MILITARY EQUIPMENT REPORTING CONSIDERATIONS
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall submit a military equipment report to the City Council for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval of this policy, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the Department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year, for each type of military equipment in the Department's inventory.

The annual military equipment report shall, at a minimum, include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment:
(a) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use. (b) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment. (c) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response. (d) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report. (e) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. (f) If the Department intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.

Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing an annual military equipment report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and Seal Beach Police Department's funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment. This shall occur as a part of the Department's presentation to the City Council.
706.6 CATALOGING OF MILITARY USE EQUIPMENT
All military use equipment kept and maintained by the Seal Beach Police Department shall be cataloged in a way which addresses each of the following requirements:

1. The manufacturer's description of the equipment.

2. The capabilities of the equipment.

3. The purposes and authorized uses for which the Department proposes to use the equipment.

4. The expected lifespan of the equipment.

5. The fiscal impact of the equipment, both initially and for on-going maintenance.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 4

6. The quantity of the equipment, whether maintained or sought. 706.7 COMPLIANCE
The Support Services Bureau Lieutenant will ensure that all Department members comply with this policy and will conduct an annual audit. The Chief of Police or designee will be notified of any policy violations and, as appropriate, the violation(s) will be referred to the Internal Affairs Division and handled in accordance with Policy 1009 (Personnel Complaints). All instances of non-compliance will be reported to City Council via the annual military equipment report.

Any member of the public can register a question or concern regarding military use equipment by contacting the Seal Beach Police Department via email at [email protected]. A response to the question or concern shall be completed and provided by the Department in a timely manner, but not to exceed thirty (30) days.

Any member of the public can submit a complaint to any member of the Department and in any form (i.e., in person, telephone, email, etc.). Once the complaint is received, it shall be routed to the Internal Affairs Division in accordance with Policy 1009. 706.8 FUNDING
The Department shall obtain City Council approval, by an ordinance adopting a new or revised military equipment use policy, prior to seeking funds for military equipment, including, but not limited to, applying for a grant, soliciting, or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.

The Department has authority to apply for funding prior to obtaining City Council approval in the case of exigent circumstances.In such case, the Department shall obtain City Council approval as soon thereafter as practicable. In seeking such approval, the Support Services Bureau Lieutenant will submit to the City Council a report explaining the nature of the exigency and why prior approval could not be obtained.
706.9 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes an inventory of previously purchased equipment for the Seal Beach Police Department deemed to be military and militaristic as defined by this policy.

1. Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS)
A UAS is an unmanned aircraft and the equipment necessary for the safe and efficient operation of the aircraft. An unmanned aircraft is a component of a UAS. It is defined by statute as an aircraft that is operated without the possibility of direct human intervention from within or on the aircraft.

Current Inventory:

DJI MAVIC 2 ENTERPRISE DUAL
Description: UAS that has a color and infrared camera as well as audible speaker and light.

Capable of video recording and weighs 899 grams, approx. 30 minutes of flight time.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 5
Quantity: 2
Purchase Price: $5,500 each
DJI Avata
Description: First-person-view (FPV) "Cinewhoop" UAS designed to take high-quality video.

The model is smaller, lighter, more agile, and equipped with propeller guards so that it is safe to fly around people and in-door use.

Quantity: 1 (Serial Number 1581F4QWD227B0021HFY)
Purchase Price: $677.74 each
Purpose: To be deployed when its view would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to:
(a) major collision investigations
(b) search for missing persons
(c) natural disaster management
(d) crime scene photography
(e) SWAT, tactical or other public safety and life preservation missions (f) In response to specific requests from local, state, or federal fire authorities for fire response and/or prevention.

Authorized Use: Only assigned operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate any UAS during approved missions.

Expected Life Span: All UAS equipment, 3-5 years.

Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance and battery replacement cost is approximately $2,000.

Training Required: All Department UAS operators must be licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration for UAS operation. In addition, each operator must attend a 40-hour Department training and ongoing quarterly training.

Legal and Procedural Rules: Use is established under Policy 606, FAA Regulation 14 CFR Part 107, and the City of Seal Beach UAS policy. It is the policy of the Seal Beach Police Department to utilize UAS only for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law.

2. 40 MM Launchers and Rounds
40MM Launchers are utilized by Department personnel as a less lethal tool to launch impact rounds.

Current Inventory:

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM SINGLE SHOT LAUNCHER
Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 6
Description: The 40MM Single Launcher is a tactical single shot launcher that features an expandable ROGERS Super Stock and an adjustable Integrated Front Grip (IFG) with light rail. It will fire standard 40mm less lethal ammunition, up to 4.8 inches in cartridge length.

It will launch a 40mm less lethal round up to 131 feet and is only authorized to be used by SWAT personnel. Serial Numbers #D36434/FW21222/FW21223.

Quantity: 1
Purchase Price: $1,000 each
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, EXACT IMPACT 40MM ROUND
Description: The eXact iMpact 40mm sponge round is a point-of-aim, point-of-impact directfire round. This is a lightweight, high-speed projectile consisting of a plastic body and sponge projectile that is spin stabilized via the incorporated rifling collar and the 40mm launcher's rifled barrel. The round utilizes smokeless powder as the propellant, and therefore, has velocities that are extremely consistent. It is used for crowd control, patrol, and tactical applications. Part Number 6325.

Quantity: 41
Purchase Price: $26.50 each
Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.

Authorized Use: Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
(a) Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. (b) Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
(c) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. (d) Potentially vicious animals.
(e) Training exercises or approved demonstrations.

Training: Sworn members utilizing 40mm less lethal chemical agents or impact rounds must first be trained in their use by POST certified less lethal and chemical agent instructors.

Expected Life Span: Defense Technology Launchers - 25 years, Rounds - 5 years.

Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance is approximately $50 for each launcher.

Legal and Procedural Rules: Use is established under Policy 302.7.2. It is the policy of the Seal Beach Police Department to utilize the 40mm only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including laws regarding the use of force.

3. Less Lethal Shotgun
Less Lethal Shotgun is used to deploy the less lethal 12-gauge Super-Sock Beanbag Round.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 7
Current Inventory:

REMINGTON 870 LESS LETHAL SHOTGUN
Description: The Remington 870 Less Lethal Shotgun is used to deploy the less lethal 12- gauge Super-Sock Beanbag Round up to a distance of 75 feet. The range of the weapon system helps to maintain space between officers and a suspect reducing the immediacy of the threat which is a principle of De-escalation.

Quantity: 13
Purchase Price: $946 each
Drag Stabilized 12-GAUGE BEANBAG ROUND
Description: A less lethal 2.4-inch 12-gauge shotgun round firing a ballistic fiber bag filled with 40 grams of lead shot at a velocity of 270-290 feet per second (FPS). Drag Stabilized rounds are discharged from a dedicated 12-gauge shotgun that is distinguishable by an orange butt stock and fore grip. This round provides accurate and effective performance when fired from the approved distance of not fewer than five (5) feet. The maximum effective range of this munition is up to 75 feet from the target. The Drag Stabilized Model is in its deployed state immediately upon exiting the barrel. It does not require a minimum range to "unfold" or "stabilize." The Drag Stabilized Model is an aerodynamic projectile. However, accuracy is relative to the shotgun, barrel length, environmental conditions, and the operator. The Drag Stabilized Model is very accurate. However, effectiveness depends on many variables, such as distance, clothing, stature, and the point where the projectile impacts.

Quantity: 317
Purchase Price: $5 each
Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.

Authorized Use: Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
(a) Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. (b) Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
(c) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. (d) Potentially vicious animals.
(e) Training exercises or approved demonstrations.

Expected Life Span: Remington 870 Less Lethal Shotgun- 25 years, Drag Stabilized 12-Gauge beanbag round - no listed expiration date.

Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance is approximately $50 for each shotgun.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 8
Training: All officers must first be trained in the 12 gauge less lethal shotgun as a less lethal option by in-service training. SWAT personnel receive additional training internally when they transfer to the unit. SWAT operators who utilize these munitions must have been through and successfully completed a POST approved gas school and/or trained in house by POST certified chemical agent instructors for muzzle blast training.

Legal and Procedural Rules: Use is established under Policy 305.4.2. It is the policy of the Seal Beach Police Department to utilize the less lethal shotgun only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including laws regarding the use of force.

4. Rifles
Firearm designed and intended to be fired from the shoulder and designed to use the energy in a fixed metallic cartridge to fire only a single projectile through a rifled bore for each single pull of the trigger.

Current Inventory:

Colt AR-15 223 16"
Description: lightweight, magazine-fed, gas-operated semi-automatic rifle. Caliber 223, 16- inch barrel.

Quantity: 37
Purchase Price: $846.56 per firearm
Colt AR-15 223 Short Barrel Rifle (SBR)
Description: lightweight, magazine-fed, gas-operated semi-automatic rifle. Caliber 223, 16- inch barrel.

Quantity: 3
Purchase Price: $1,223.64 per firearm
Geissele AR-15 223 14.5 SBR
Description: lightweight, magazine-fed, gas-operated semi-automatic rifle. Caliber 223, 14.5- inch barrel.

Quantity: 5
Purchase Price: $750 per firearm
Geissele AR-15 5.56 10.3 SBR
Description: lightweight, magazine-fed, gas-operated semi-automatic rifle. Caliber 5.56, 10.3- inch barrel.

Quantity: 6
Purchase Price: $925 per firearm
Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 9
H&K MP-7 4.6X30 7.1"
Description: lightweight, magazine-fed, gas-operated semi-automatic rifle. Chambered for the HK 4.6×30mm armor-piercing cartridge designed by manufacturer Heckler & Koch. 7.1- inch barrel.

Quantity: 2
Purchase Price: $1,852.20 per firearm
Winchester.223 Remington 55GR silver tip rifle round
Description:.223 Remington caliber, Fragmenting Polymer Tip (FPT), 55 grain bullet weight, brass cartridge case material.

Quantity: 3,680
Purchase Price: $802.74 (price per 1,000)
Winchester.223 Remington 55GR frangible rifle round
Description:.223 Remington caliber, Frangible, 55 grain bullet weight, brass cartridge case material.

Quantity: 1,900
Purchase Price: $668.05 (price per 1,000)
Winchester 5.56 MM 55GRFull Metal Jacket (FMJ) rifle round Description: 5.56 MM caliber, Full Metal Jacket (FMJ), 55 grain bullet weight, brass cartridge case material.

Quantity: 6,000
Purchase Price: $392.21 (price per 1,000)
L-Tech 4.6 x 30MM 31GR Frangible rifle round
Description: 4.6x30MM caliber, Frangible, 31 grain bullet weight.

Quantity: 4,800
Purchase Price: $437.50 (price per 1,000)
L-Tech 4.6 x 30MM 31GR OTM
Description: 4.6x30MM caliber, Open Tip Match (OTM), 31 grain bullet weight.

Quantity: 880
Purchase Price: $572.00 (price per 1,000)
Purpose: To be used as precision weapons to address a threat with more precision and/or greater distances than a handgun, if present and feasible.

Authorized Use: Only members that are POST certified are authorized to use a rifle.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 10
Expected Life Span: No expiration date.

Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance is approximately $50 for each rifle.

Training: Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification two times a year.

Legal and Procedural Rules: Use is established under Policy 305.4.3. It is the policy of the SBPD to utilize rifles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal laws regarding the use of force.

5. PepperBall Launcher
A device that discharges irritant projectiles.

Current Inventory:

Tippmann PepperBall Gun
Description: A compressed-air powered launcher designed to fire non-lethal PepperBall projectiles.

Quantity: 2
Purchase Price: $1,146.50
PepperBall LIVE-X PROJECTILE
Description: The Live Projectile contains a concentrated amount of PAVA pepper powder.

One round of LIVE-X contains the equivalent to 10 PepperBall rounds. Discharged from a PepperBall Launcher, the projectile has a velocity of 280-350 FPS. The projectile has a direct impact of 60ft and an area of saturation of 150+ft. The projectile contains 5% PAVA Powder.

Quantity: 340
Purchase Price: $3 per projectile
Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include but are not limited to:
(a) Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. (b) Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
(c) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. (d) Potentially vicious animals.
(e) Training exercises or approved demonstrations.

Authorized Use: Only those officers who have been trained in the use of PepperBall launchers are authorized to use the PepperBall launchers.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 11
Training: Only sworn members may utilize PepperBall launchers and projectiles and must first be trained in their use by POST certified less lethal and chemical agent instructors.

Expected Life Span:
(a) Tippmann PepperBall Gun - 20 years
(b) PepperBall Live-X Projectile - 3 years
Fiscal impact: Annual maintenance is approximately $50 for each PepperBall launcher.

Legal and Procedural Rules: Use is established under Policy 302.7.2. It is the policy of the SBPD to utilize PepperBall only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including laws regarding the use of force.
706.10 MILITARY SWAT EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The Seal Beach Police Department participates in the West County Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team, a regional SWAT and Crisis Negotiation Team (CNT) with Officers from the cities of Seal Beach, Los Alamitos, Cypress, Fountain Valley, and Westminster.

The following constitutes an inventory of previously purchased equipment known to be owned and/ or utilized by law enforcement units with which the Seal Beach Police Department collaborates and/or participates for law enforcement purposes, which are deemed to be military and militaristic as defined by this policy. The equipment in this section is primarily used by the members of the West County SWAT Team.

1. Armored Vehicles
Commercially produced wheeled armored personnel vehicle utilized for law enforcement purposes.

Current Inventory:

LENCO BEARCAT G2
Description: Armored vehicle that seats 10-12 personnel with open floor plan that allows for rescue of down personnel. It can stop various projectiles, which provides greater safety to citizens and officers beyond the protection level of shield and personal body armor, VIN FDAF5HT2BEC98082.

Quantity: 1
Purchase Price: Refer to Westminster Police Department policy Purpose: To be used in response to critical incidents to enhance officer and community safety, improve scene containment and stabilization, and assist in resolving critical incidents.

Authorized Use: The use of armored vehicles shall only be authorized by a watch commander or SWAT commander, based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. Armored vehicles shall be used only by officers trained in their deployment and in a manner consistent with Department policy and training.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 12
Expected Lifespan: 25 years.

Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance cost of approximately $10,000.

Training: All driver/operators must first attend formalized instruction and be trained in vehicle operations and practical driving instruction.

Legal and Procedural Rules: It is the policy of the Department to utilize armored vehicles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law.

Other Notes: The bearcat was obtained through the UASI group procurement process in 2012.

The vehicle is currently stored at Westminster Police Department and used by the West County SWAT during training and SWAT operations for the region.

2. Mobile Command Post Vehicle (MCP)
A vehicle used mobile office that provides shelter, access to Department computer systems, and restroom facilities during extended events.

Current Inventory:

Freightliner M2 106 vehicle
Description: The MCP can also be utilized for SWAT/CNT and other critical incidents, preplanned large events, searching for missing persons, natural disasters, and community events.

Quantity: 1
Purchase Price: Refer to Cypress Police Department policy Purpose: To be used based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident, large event, natural disaster, or community event that is taking place.

Authorized Use: Only officers trained in their deployment and operations in a manner consistent with Department policy and training are authorized to operate the MCP. Furthermore, only officers who have completed the California State Class B Commercial driving school and become properly licensed will be allowed to drive the MCP. Situations which the MCP is authorized for use would include but not be limited to critical incidents, emergencies, and natural disasters.

Expected Lifespan: The MCP, 20-year lifespan on chassis and vehicle structure. Upgrades needed in 7 years to maintain IT systems.

Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance cost is approximately $1,000. Cost-sharing for the vehicle is administered by the Cypress Finance Department and each city is billed a third of costs associated with the annual vehicle maintenance and technology service fees.

Training: The driver/operator must first receive training in the safe handling of the vehicle on a closed training course. Once the operator has shown competence in vehicle handling, the driver/ operator will drive the vehicle throughout the city with an experienced driver. Driver/operators shall Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 13
also undergo California Department of Motor Vehicles commercial vehicle testing and possess a Class B driver's license.

Legal and Procedural Rules: It is the policy of the Department to use the MCP only for official law enforcement purposes, and in accordance with California State law regarding the operation of motor vehicles.

Other Notes: After the City of Anaheim UASI group completed the procurement process and the vehicle was built, the City of Cypress took delivery of the MCP on April 19, 2007. The City of Cypress entered into an agreement with the cities of Los Alamitos and Seal Beach to accept, house, utilize and cost-share repairs and routine maintenance for the regional MCP vehicle.

The vehicle is currently housed inside a City of Seal Beach fire station (OCFA station #48) and is utilized by all three cities for special events that include DUI checkpoints, public relations presentations, and emergency incidents. The vehicle is also the primary command and control platform for West County S.W.A.T. during training and S.W.A.T. operations for the region. The vehicle is staffed with a team of City employees and designated volunteers from all three cities including the West Cities Police Dispatch Communications Center. Cost-sharing for the vehicle is administered by the Cypress Finance Department and each city is billed a third of costs associated with the annual vehicle maintenance and technology service fees.

3. Light Sound Diversionary Devices (LSDD)
A device used to distract dangerous persons.

Current Inventory:

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS (CTS), MODEL 7290 FLASH BANG
Description: This is the standard diversionary flash-bang device. It is non-bursting, nonfragmenting single use device that produces a 175db and 6-8 million candela of light output.

It is ideal for distracting potentially dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, building/room entry or other high-risk arrest situations.

Quantity: 1
Purchase Price: $45 each
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, NO. 15 STINGER GRENADE
Description: This is a hand-held, hand-thrown grenade and has an initial 1 second delayed fuse. Once the fuse is discharge at a low speed, the main charge detonates to produce a loud sound and bright flash of light, and the distribution of approximately 180 rubber pellets of.32 caliber size are expelled from the grenade, and the pellets can travel up to 50 ft. from the point of detonation.

Quantity: 15
Purchase Price: $36 each
Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 14
Purpose: A diversionary device is ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations. To produce atmospheric overpressure and brilliant white light and, as a result, can cause short-term (6 - 8 seconds) physiological/psychological sensory deprivation to give officers a tactical advantage.

Authorized Use: Diversionary Devices shall only be used:
(a) By officers who have been trained in their proper use. (b) In hostage and barricaded subject situations.
(c) In high-risk warrant (search/arrest) services where there may be extreme hazards to officers.
(d) During other high-risk situations where their use would enhance officer safety. (e) During training exercises.

Expected Lifespan: Until used.

Fiscal Impact: No annual maintenance.

Training: Prior to use, officers must attend diversionary device training that is conducted by POST certified instructors.

Legal and Procedural Rules: Use is established under Policy 302.6. It is the policy of the SBPD to utilize diversion devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Other Notes: This equipment is owned and operated by West County SWAT through the Cypress Police Department, which could result in its deployment and/or use in the City of Seal Beach.

4. Chemical Agent and Smoke Canisters
Canisters that contain chemical agents that are released when deployed.

Current Inventory:

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, DIRECT IMPACT 40MM CS ROUND
Description: The Direct Impact 40MM CS munition is a point-of-aim, point-of-impact directfire round. The munition can be used to incapacitate a single subject or control a crowd. The munition is loaded with CS powder and is combined with lightweight, high-speed crushable foam projectile for maximizing the potential for incapacitation. Part Number 6322.

Quantity: 4
Purchase Price: $26.50 each
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, DIRECT IMPACT 40MM OC ROUND
Description: The 40MM Direct Impact OC munition is a point-of-aim, point-of-impact directfire round. The munition is loaded OC powder and is combined with a lightweight, high-speed projectile consisting of a plastic body and crushable foam nose. Part Number 6320.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 15
Quantity: 5
Purchase Price: 26.50 each

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, FLAMELESS TRI-CHAMBER CS GRENADE
Description: The design of the Tri-Chamber Flameless CS Grenade allows the contents to burn within an internal can and disperse the agent safely with reduced risk of fire. The grenade is designed primarily for indoor tactical situations to detect and/or dislodge a barricaded subject. This grenade will deliver 20 grams of agent during its 20-30 seconds burn time. The device is not launchable. Part Number 1032.

Quantity: 2
Purchase Price: $34.94 each

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SPEDE-HEAT CS GRENADE
Description: The Spede-Heat CS Grenade is a high volume, continuous burn munition. It expels a CS payload of 81.2 grams in approximately 20-40 seconds. The CS is discharged through four gas ports on top of the canister, three gas ports on the side, and one gas port on the bottom. The device is launchable. Part Number 1072.

Quantity: 15
Purchase Price: $28.30 each

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY CS TRIPLE-CHASER SEPARATING CANISTER Description: The Triple-Chaser separating CS consists of three separate canisters pressed together with separating charges between each section (canister). When deployed, this grenade will separate into three (3) distinct sub-munitions, spaced approximately 20ft. apart.

This allows increased area coverage in a short period of time, from one deployment. Terrain and surface conditions can affect the distance of the separating sub-munitions. The device is specifically designed for outdoor use in crowd control situations. The separating function and relatively quick burn time minimizes the potential of a "throwback" from hostile or combative subjects. The munition is launchable. Part Number 1026.

Quantity: 1
Purchase Price: $44.89 each
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY 40MM CS FERRET POWDER BARRICADE PENETRATING

PROJECTILE ROUND
Description: The 40MM CS Ferret Powder munition is a barricade penetrating round filled with a CS Powder chemical agent. It is a frangible projectile that is spin stabilized utilizing barrel rifling of the 40MM launcher. It is non-burning and designed to penetrate barriers. It is primarily used to dislodge barricaded subjects and can also be used for area denial. It is used by tactical teams to penetrate barriers such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard (drywall), and thin plywood. Upon impact, the nose ruptures and instantaneously delivers Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 16
the agent payload inside of a structure of vehicle. The active CS agent is 7.6 grams and instantaneously discharges on impact. Part Number 2292.

Quantity: 7
Purchase Price: $20.91 each
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY 40MM CS FERRET LIQUID BARRICADE PENETRATING

PROJECTILE ROUND
Description: The 40MM CS Ferret Liquid munition is a frangible projectile filled with chemical agent. It is designed to deliver chemical agents in barricade situations from a 40mm launcher.

Spin stabilization from barrel rifling affords maximum stand-off distance and accuracy for safety. The munition is non-burning and suitable for indoor use. It is designed to penetrate barriers, such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard, and thin plywood. Upon impacting the barrier, the nose cone ruptures and instantaneously delivers a small chemical payload inside of a structure or vehicle. The active CS agent is 27.6 grams and instantaneously discharges on impact. Part Number 2262.

Quantity: 7
Purchase Price: $21.53 each

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY CS RIOT CONTROL CONTINUOUS DISCHARGE GRENADE Description: The Riot Control CS Grenade is designed specifically for outdoor use in crowd control situations with a high volume continuous burn that expels its payload in approximately 20-40 seconds through four gas ports located on the top of the canister. This grenade can be used to conceal tactical movement or to route a crowd. The volume of smoke and agent is vast and obtrusive. This launchable grenade is 6.0 in. by 2.35 in. and holds approximately

0.88oz. of active agent.

Quantity: 15
Purchase Price: $32.70

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY POCKET TACTICAL CS GRENADE
Description: The Pocket Tactical CS Grenade is small, and lightweight. The 0.9 oz. of active agent will burn approximately 20-40 seconds. At 4.75 in. by 1.4 inches in size, it easily fits in most tactical pouches. This is a launchable grenade; however it is normally used as a signaling or covering device. Though this device is slightly over four inches in length, it produces a smoke cloud so fast it appears to be an enveloping screen produced by a full size tactical grenade.

Quantity: 15
Purchase Price: $31.25
Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 17
Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
(a) Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. (b) Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
(c) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. (d) Potentially vicious animals.
(e) Training exercises or approved demonstrations.

Authorized Use: Only officers who have received POST certification in the use chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents.

Training: Sworn members utilizing chemical agent canisters must first be certified by POST less lethal and chemical agent instructors.

Expected Lifespan: 5 years from manufacturing date.

Fiscal Impact: No annual maintenance.

Legal and Procedural Rules: Use is established under the Seal Beach Police Department Chemical Agent Policy 302.7.2. It is the policy of the SBPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

Other Notes: This equipment is owned and operated by Seal Beach Police Department and used by the West County SWAT during training and SWAT operations for the region.

5. Kinetic Breaching Tools
Tools that are used to conduct a kinetic breach. The tool utilizes a self contained impact ram that has no projectiles or explosive pressures exiting the tool.

Current Inventory:

Kinetic Breaching Tool (KBT) Model 3-1000
Description: The KBT is a powder actuated kinetic energy forced entry tool. It utilizes a crimped blank explosive charge which drives a captive steel impact plate directed at the breach point. The impact plate extends forward out of the clamshell shroud and impacts against the target with a high level of kinetic energy to defeat the entry point or fortification.

The impact plate automatically retracts and is reset in the breaching device. The KBT uses semi-automatic cycling, allowing repeated strikes on hardened or multiple targets. The KBT's intended use is for forced entry during high-risk operations with secure entry points and is designed to be operated by a single officer/tactical team member. The KBT weighs 28 lbs. dimensions are 35 in. x 9.9 in. x 9.3 in. and has an audible report of 115 dB. The KBT utilizes a proprietary blank cartridge to deliver up to 850 ft. lbs. of kinetic energy through the steel Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 18
ram. There is no projectile or explosive energy that leaves the device except for the force of the ram, which is permanently captured in the breaching device.

Quantity: 1
Purchase Price: $10,494.38 each
Purpose: To safely gain entry into a structure.

Authorized Use: Explosive breaching may only occur after authorization by the Incident Commander or SWAT Commander in the field, and during training exercises.

Expected Lifespan:
(a) Kinetic Breaching Tool (KBT) - 30 years
(b) Blank cartridges – 5 years (preferably rotate rounds within 1 year) Fiscal Impact: No annual maintenance.

Training: All officers who use explosive breaching tools shall first attend 40 hours of explosive breaching instruction and must additionally receive quarterly training for explosive operations.

Legal and Procedural Rules: It is the policy of the Seal Beach Police Department to utilize breaching tools only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law.

Other Notes: This equipment is owned and operated by Seal Beach Police Department and used by the West County SWAT during training and SWAT operations for the region.

6. Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD)
A high intensity directional acoustical array for long-range, crystal-clear hailing, notification, and an unmistakable warning tone. The LRAD is primarily used as a communication device.

Current Inventory:

Genasys Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) Model 500X
Description: The Genasys Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) is a public address system optimized to the primary range of hearing. The LRAD system can deliver a live or recorded voice message with clarity for any operational scenario. LRAD's advanced driver and waveguide technology ensures every broadcast is clearly heard and understood, even above crowd, engine, and background noise. The LRAD 500X is compact, lightweight, and designed for applications ranging from fixed security installations to vehicles and vessels. The 500X is easily mounted and transportable to provide law enforcement long-range communication and safe, scalable non-kinetic escalation of force. The audible range of the LRAD 500X can reach up to 6,561 ft. American Technology Corp. Serial Number: 05984 UASI ASAUA/DHS Number 11-00456.

Quantity: 1
Purchase Price: Refer to Westminster Police Department policy Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 19
Purpose: To be used to issue dispersal orders during crowd and riot control situations or to address the public in the event of civil emergencies, natural disasters, evacuations, and police incidents (e.g., missing persons, perimeters for wanted suspects/ K9 deployments, etc.). The LRAD may also be used to issue a warning tone.

Authorized Use: LRAD use may only occur after the authorization of the Incident Commander or SWAT Commander in the field and/or during training exercises by personnel trained to operate the LRAD.

Expected Lifespan: 25 years with proper maintenance
Fiscal Impact: No annual maintenance.

Training: Only officers trained in the use of the LRAD are authorized to set up and operate the device.

Legal and Procedural Rules: It is the policy of the Seal Beach Police Department to utilize the Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal Law.

Other Notes: This equipment is owned and operated by West County SWAT through the Westminster Police Department, which could result in its deployment and/or use in the City of Seal Beach.

7. Robots
A remotely controlled unmanned machine that operates on the ground, which is utilized to enhance the safety of the community and officers.

Current Inventory:

TRANSCEND Vantage Patrol Robot
Description: Transcend's Vantage robot is the world's only double-patented automatic stair and obstacle climbing robot for First Responders. It's the only option for First Responders that want their robot to "just figure it out" on the first attempt to climb stairs, clothes, and junk without the burden of tedious manual controls associated with flippers and other limb systems. This means the Vantage can be used without prior training to enter a house or building to see, hear and learn what's happening before sending officers inside.

Cameras: Drive Camera (Night Vision), Pan Tilt Zoom (25x zoom, 90/15 degree up/down tilt, auto infrared night vision), FLIR Thermal. 3 hours constant driving, 12 hours monitoring / intermittent driving. 100+ lb. payload, zero degree turning radius, two-way audio (push to talk), key ignition, easy battery swapping (robot and controller).

Quantity: 1
Purchase Price: Refer to Westminster Police Department policy Purpose: To be used to remotely gain visual/audio data, deliver HNT phone, open doors, disrupt packages, and clear buildings.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 20
Authorized Use: Only assigned operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate the robot(s) identified above. Use is established by the Bomb Squad Commander or Incident Commander.

Expected Lifespan: 8 to 10 years.

Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance and battery replacement cost is approximately $500.

Training: All robot operators must first complete the FBI's 6-week hazardous device school prior to operating the robot(s) identified above.

Legal and Procedural Rules: It is the policy of the SBPD to utilize a robot only for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law.

Other Notes: This equipment is owned and operated by West County SWAT through the Westminster Police Department, which could result in its deployment and/or use in the City of Seal Beach.
706.11 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the City Council by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the City Council and is available on the Department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071).The military equipment policy must be approved by the City Council prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting, or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this Department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the City Council.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above.

Seal Beach Police Department
Seal Beach PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/01/15, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Seal Beach Police Department Military Equipment - 21
706.12 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment used by any member of this Department shall be approved for use and in accordance with this Department policy. Military equipment used by other jurisdictions that are providing mutual aid to this Department shall comply with their respective military equipment use policies in rendering mutual aid.
706.13 MAINTENANCE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT SUPPLY LEVELS
When stocks of military equipment ammunition have reached significantly low levels or have been exhausted, the Department may order up to 10% of stock in a calendar year without City Council approval to maintain essential availability for the Department's needs. Seal Beach Police Department is authorized to acquire additional stock of items listed here from other law enforcement agencies or California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) in the event of an emergency when approved by the Chief of Police or designee.

QUOTE
DATE: 02/04/2026
PHONE: FAX:

PRICES PER THOUSAND ROUNDS
Price Quote
Ship To:

Here are the requested prices:

SEAL BEACH POLICE DEPT

PETE KROK - CAMREN WIGHT
911 SEAL BEACH BLVD.

SEAL BEACH CA 90740
(562) 799-4100 (562) 431-4874
QUOTE #: 028415
Cust. ID #: 000472
TERMS: Net 30
Type: FET OUT - Agency
County: ORANGE

QUANTITY SYMBOL DESCRIPTION PRICE EXTENSION

10.000 W223K 223 55gr. Full Metal Jacket $474.00 $4,740.00 NOTES:

Pete,
See above for your quote, and let me know if
you have any questions. At this time (which can
change quickly) the ammo quoted for Will Call
is currently available for pickup after order
finalization.

Anne
SUBTOTAL:

TAX*: TAX
RATE:

TOTAL:
$4,740.00
$367.35
$0.00
$5,107.35

7.7500%
SHIPPING:

PO# (if appl.)________________ Authorization Signature ____________________________ Name & Title __________________________________
Quote is for official department use only
To proceed with the order as quoted, please confirm the details above, and sign & complete below:

Date ______________________
Will Call Pickup Date__________________________
Agenda Item J

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 23, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Patrick Gallegos, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approving a Professional Services Agreement with Seal Beach Cable Communications Foundation
________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF REQUEST:

That the City Council adopt Resolution 7743:

1. Approving a Professional Services Agreement with the Seal Beach Cable Communications Foundation for Production of Public, Educational, and Government Communication Services; and,

2. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement.

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:

The City of Seal Beach has provided public, education and government cable television services through partnership with Seal Beach Television (SBTV-3) and the Seal Beach Cable Communications Foundation (Foundation) for over 40 years.

Previously the City contracted directly with Station Manager Robin Fort-Lincke, to provide management services for SBTV-3. The Foundation has traditionally operated as an advisory board providing insight into programming and various other items such as equipment related to public access television.

Following the unexpected passing of Robin Fort-Lincke, the City partnered with the Foundation to provide services for the past few years. The City would like to formalize the relationship with the Foundation by entering into a Professional Services Agreement that clearly defines the services provided by the Foundation.

These services include coverage of City Council meetings, Planning Commission meetings, special meetings, and special events and providing public access content.

The City is proposing to compensate the Foundation in a total not-to-exceed amount of $90,000 for services for the fiscal year inclusive of the agreement. This amount was approved as part of budget adoption for fiscal year 2025-2026.

Additionally, the Council has approved Capital Improvement Projects for up to $160,000 that upgrade the control room and equipment used in the Council

Chambers. Capital Improvement Projects will be managed and awarded by the City directly, and staff will coordinate all work with the Foundation.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

There is no environmental impact related to this item.

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

The City Attorney has reviewed and approved as to form.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

All funds associated with the agreement have been approved in the budget for fiscal year 2025-2026.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is not applicable to the Strategic Plan.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt Resolution 7743:

1. Approving a Professional Services Agreement with the Seal Beach Cable Communications Foundation for Production of Public, Educational, and Government Communication Services; and,

2. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

SUBMITTED, NOTED, AND APPROVED BY:

Patrick Gallegos
Patrick Gallegos, City Manager
Prepared by: Tim Kelsey, Recreation Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution 7743
B. Professional Services Agreement with Seal Beach Cable Communications Foundation
RESOLUTION 7743

A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH

AND THE SEAL BEACH CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

FOUNDATION
WHEREAS, the City uses the services of the Seal Beach Cable Communications Foundation to film and make public meetings available to the public; and, WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach wishes to engage with the public using Seal Beach Television (SBTV-3) as an opportunity to participate in local government; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Seal Beach City Council does resolve, declare, determine, and order as follows:

Section 1. The City Council hereby approves a Professional Services Agreement between the Seal Beach Cable Communications
Foundation and City of Seal Beach to provide services related to public access television including but not limited to the filming of public meetings.

Section 2. The City Council hereby directs the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 23rd of February 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members
NOES: Council Members
ABSENT: Council Members
ABSTAIN: Council Members
Lisa Landau, Mayor
ATTEST:

Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
I, Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution 7743 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of February 2026.

Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
for
Production of Public, Educational, and Government
Communication Services
between
City of Seal Beach
211 - 8th Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
&
Seal Beach Cable Communications Foundation
201 8th Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 596-1404
This Professional Service Agreement (“the Agreement”) is made as of February 23, 2026 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the Seal Beach Cable Communications Foundation (“Consultant”), a California nonprofit public benefit corporation and the City of Seal Beach (“City”), a California charter city, (collectively, “the Parties”). 2 of 21

RECITALS
A. City desires certain professional broadcast and communication services related to Public, Educational, and Government (PEG) content.

B. Pursuant to the authority provided by its City Charter and Seal Beach Municipal Code § 3.20.025(C), professional services, such as broadcast and communications services, are exempt from bidding requirements.

C. Consultant represents that the principal employees and volunteers of the organization are fully qualified to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement by virtue of its experience, training, education and expertise.

D. City desires to retain Consultant as an independent contractor and Consultant desires to serve City to perform those professional services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Parties' performance of the promises, covenants, and conditions stated herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows.

AGREEMENT

1.0 Consultant’s Services

1.1. Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those professional services (collectively “Services”) set forth in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, all to City’s reasonable satisfaction. These Services relate to the following City project: to produce PEG content, including public meetings conducted to carry out City business, including City Council and Planning Commission meetings.

1.2. Agreement Documents; Order of Precedence.

1.2.1. The Agreement Documents include this Agreement itself, and all of the following: (i) the Exhibits attached to or referenced in this Agreement.

Unless otherwise indicated therein, the “Scope of Services”, Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference, together with any additional City standards or specifications or requirements set forth therein.

1.2.2. In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between this Agreement and any Exhibit or incorporated documents, the order of precedence shall be as follows: (i) this Agreement; and then (ii) Exhibit A; and then (iii) Exhibit B (Terms for Compliance with California Labor Law Requirements); and then (iv) Exhibit C (if any); and then (v) Exhibit D (if any). In the event there is any conflict 3 of 21
between the Agreement, on the one hand, and any of the Exhibits, the Agreement shall govern.

1.3. Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the Services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing all Services. The City relies upon the skill of Consultant, and Consultant’s staff, if any, to do and perform the Services in a skillful, competent, and professional manner, and Consultant and Consultant’s staff, shall perform the Services in such manner. The City recognizes the current standard of care that the Consultant has provided the City and expects the same level of care and production going forward. The acceptance of Consultant’s work by the City shall not operate as a release of Consultant from such standard of care and workmanship.

1.4. Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant (i) has investigated and considered the scope and level of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (iii) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from City’s Representative.

1.5. Compliance with Laws. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law...

1.6. Additional Services. Consultant will not be compensated for any work performed not specified in the Scope of Services unless the City authorizes such work in advance and in writing. The City Manager may authorize extra work to fund unforeseen conditions up to the amount approved at the time of award by the City Council. Payment for additional work in excess of this amount requires prior City Council authorization.

2.0 Term

2.1. Original Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date and shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2026 unless sooner terminated or extended as provided by this Agreement.

5 of 21

5.1.2. This Agreement may be terminated by City upon 10 days’ notice to Consultant if Consultant fails to provide satisfactory evidence of renewal or replacement of comprehensive general liability insurance as required by this Agreement at least 20 days before the expiration date of the previous policy.

5.2. Termination by Consultant. This Agreement may be terminated by Consultant based on reasonable cause, by serving written notice of termination to City, provided that Consultant has first served City with a written notice of default and demand to cure, and City has failed to cure such default within 30 days of receipt of such notice.

5.3. Obligations Upon Termination. Unless otherwise specified in the notice of termination, Consultant shall cease all work under this Agreement immediately upon receipt of notice of termination from City under Subsection 5.1, or immediately upon City’s acknowledgment of receipt of Consultant’s notice of termination to City under Subsection 5.1. Upon termination, City shall be immediately given title to and possession of all Work Product (as defined in Subsection 11.1 of this Agreement) and all other documents, writings, and/or deliverables produced or developed pursuant to this Agreement. Provided that Consultant is not then in breach, City shall pay Consultant for any portion of the Services completed prior to termination, based on the reasonable value of the Services rendered. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any specific task for which a payment request has not been received, the charge for Services performed shall be the reasonable value of such Services, based on an amount agreed to by City and Consultant. City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to payment for unperformed services or services within the Scope of Services performed prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement; and Consultant shall not be entitled to receive more than the amount that would be paid to Consultant for the full performance of the Services up to date of termination.

Consultant shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation or damages.

6.0 Party Representatives

6.1. The City Manager is the City’s representative for purposes of this Agreement.

6.2. The Board President is the Consultant's primary representative for purposes of this Agreement. The Board President shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. Consultant may not change its representative without the prior written approval of City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
6 of 21

7.0 Notices

7.1. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed 48 hours after deposit in the United States Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at the following addresses:

To City: City of Seal Beach
211-8th Street
Seal Beach, California 90740
Attn: City Manager
To Consultant: Seal Beach Cable Communications
Foundation
201 8th Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740

7.2. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

8.0 Permits and Licenses
Consultant and all of Consultant’s employees and other personnel shall obtain and maintain during the Agreement term all necessary licenses, permits and certificates required by law for the provision of the Services under this Agreement, including a business license as required by the Seal Beach Municipal Code.

9.0 Independent Contractor

9.1. Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. All work or other Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or by Consultant’s employees or other personnel under Consultant’s supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details by which Consultant’s employees and other personnel will perform the Services. Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the customary professional standards.

9.2. All of Consultant’s employees and other personnel performing any of the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant and Consultant’s personnel shall not supervise any of City’s employees; and City’s employees shall not supervise Consultant’s personnel. Consultant’s personnel shall not wear or display any City uniform, 7 of 21
badge, identification number, or other information identifying such individual as an employee of City; and Consultant’s personnel shall not use any City e-mail address or City telephone number in the performance of any of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall acquire and maintain at its sole cost and expense such vehicles, equipment and supplies as Consultant’s personnel require to perform any of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall perform all Services off of City premises at locations of Consultant’s choice, except (i) as otherwise required for the performance of Services on City real property, vehicles or equipment; (ii) as otherwise may from time to time be necessary in order for Consultant’s personnel to receive projects from City, review plans on file at City, pick up or deliver any work product related to Consultant’s performance of any Services under this Agreement, or (iii) as may be necessary to inspect or visit City locations and/or private property to perform such Services. City may make a computer available to Consultant from time to time for Consultant’s personnel to obtain information about or to check on the status of projects pertaining to the Services under this Agreement.

9.3. Consultant shall be responsible for and pay all wages, salaries, benefits and other amounts due to Consultant’s personnel in connection with their performance of any Services under this Agreement and as required by law.

Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: Social Security taxes, other retirement or pension benefits, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. Notwithstanding any other agency, State, or federal policy, rule, regulation, statute or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors providing any of the Services under this Agreement shall not become entitled to, and hereby waive any claims to, any wages, salaries, compensation, benefit or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to, eligibility to enroll in, or reinstate to membership in, the California Public Employees Retirement System (“PERS”) as an employee of City, and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

9.4. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from, caused by, or relating to Consultant’s personnel practices. or to the extent arising from, caused by or relating to the violation of any of the provisions of this Section 9.0. In addition to all other remedies available under law, City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. This duty of indemnification is in addition to Consultant’s duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless as set forth in any other provision of 8 of 21
this Agreement. Consultant’s covenants and obligations under this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

10.0 PERS Compliance and Indemnification

10.1. General Requirements. The Parties acknowledge that City is a local agency member of PERS, and as such has certain pension reporting and contribution obligations to PERS on behalf of qualifying employees. Consultant agrees that, in providing its employees and any other personnel to City to perform any work or other Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall assure compliance with the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (“PERL”), commencing at Government Code § 20000, as amended by the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (“PEPRA”),. and the regulations of PERS, as amended from time to time. Without limitation to the foregoing, Consultant shall assure compliance with regard to personnel who have active or inactive membership in PERS and to those who are retired annuitants and in performing this Agreement shall not assign or utilize any of its personnel in a manner that will cause City to be in violation of the PERL, PEPRA or any other applicable retirement laws and regulations.

10.2. Indemnification. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from, caused by, or relating to Consultant’s violation of any provisions of this Section 10.0. This duty of indemnification is in addition to Consultant’s duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless as set forth in any other provision of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenants and obligations under this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

11.0 Ownership of Work Product

11.1. Unless otherwise agreed upon in writing, all field notes and other notes, draft and final reports, drawings, specifications, data, surveys, studies, plans, maps, models, specifications, photographs, images, images, ideas, concepts, designs including but not limited to website designs, source code, object code, computer files, electronic data and/or files, other media of any kind whatsoever, and any other documents and written material of any kind, created, developed or used by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement (collectively “Work Product”) shall be considered “works made for hire,” for the benefit of City. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or expiration of this Agreement, all Work Product and any and all intellectual property rights arising from their creation, including, but not limited to, all copyrights and other proprietary rights, shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon their use, duplication or dissemination by City upon final payment being made in 9 of 21
accordance with Subsection 5.3, and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City for any purpose without Consultant’s consent; provided that any use, reuse or modification of the Work Product by City for any purpose other than the purpose for which the Work Product was prepared or provided under this Agreement shall be at City’s own risk. Consultant shall not obtain or attempt to obtain copyright protection as to any of the Work Product. This section shall apply only to Work Product produced by Consultant for City that relates to a public meeting of a legislative or advisory body of the City, including the City Council, Planning Commission, and other similar bodies. With respect to all other Work Product produced by Consultant as part of the Services, upon request Consultant shall provide City a no-cost, perpetual, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to use such Work Product for public purposes.

11.2. Consultant hereby assigns to City all ownership and any and all intellectual property rights to the Work Product that are not otherwise vested in City pursuant to Subsection 11.1.

11.3. Consultant warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of all Work Product produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce the Work Product for any purpose. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, volunteers, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City’s use of any of the Work Product violates federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, or any laws relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, copyrights, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, equipment, devices or processes in connection with its provision of the Services and Work Product produced under this Agreement. In the event the use of any of the Work Product or other deliverables hereunder by City is held to constitute an infringement and the use of any of the same is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (i) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product and other deliverables by suspension of any injunction, or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (ii) modify the Work Product and other deliverables so that they become non-infringing while remaining in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenants and obligations shall survive the expiration and/or termination of this Agreement.

11.4. Upon expiration or termination of the Agreement, Consultant shall deliver to City all Work Product and other deliverables related to any Services performed pursuant to this Agreement without additional cost or expense to City.

If Consultant prepares a document on a computer, Consultant shall provide City 10 of 21
with said document both in a printed format and in an electronic format that is acceptable to City.

12.0 Confidentiality

12.1. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees, trade secrets, and/or other information that may be protected under other applicable laws relating to privacy, confidentiality and/or privilege. Consultant covenants that all Work Product (as defined in Subsection 11.1) and/or any other data, documents, writings, discussion or other information created, developed, received or provided by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such Work Product, data, documents, writings, discussion or other information to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure.

Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, and/or subcontractors shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested in writing by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the Services performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary,” provided Consultant gives City timely notice of such court order or subpoena.

12.2. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and/or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City may, but has no obligation to, represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City’s right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct or rewrite the response.

12.3. Consultant’s covenants and obligations under this Section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.

13.0 Subcontractors
No portion of this Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior written approval of the City. Consultant is fully responsible to City for the performance of any and all subcontractors. Authorized subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making the subcontractor subject to all requirements of this Agreement, 11 of 21

14.0 Prohibition Against Assignment, Transfer or Delegation Consultant shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any of its rights, obligations or interest in this Agreement, or delegate any of its duties under this Agreement, either in whole or in part, without City’s prior written consent, which may be withheld for any reason. Any purported assignment, transfer or delegation without City’s consent shall be void and without effect, and shall entitle City to terminate this Agreement.

15.0 Inspection and Audit of Records
Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all Services and other matters covered under this Agreement, including but expressly not limited to, all Services performed, salaries, wages, payroll, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets, costs, expenses, receipts and other records and Work Product with respect to this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records on the Services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of all Services in connection therewith. All such records shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. At all times during regular business hours, Consultant shall provide City with free access to such records, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make copies and transcripts as City deems necessary, and shall allow inspection of all program data, information, documents, proceedings and activities and all other matters related to the performance of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall retain all financial and program service records and all other records related to the Services and performance of this Agreement for at least three (3) years after expiration, termination or final payment under this Agreement, whichever occurs later. City’s rights under this Section 15.0 shall survive for three (3) years after expiration, termination or final payment under this Agreement, whichever occurs later.

16.0 Safety Requirements
All work performed under this Agreement shall be performed in such a manner as to provide safety to the public and to meet or exceed the safety standards outlined by CAL OSHA and other applicable state and federal laws. City may issue restraint or cease and desist orders to Consultant when unsafe or harmful acts are observed or reported relative to the performance of the Services. Consultant shall maintain the work sites free of hazards to persons and property resulting from its operations. Consultant shall immediately report to the City any hazardous condition noted by Contractor.

17.0 Insurance
12 of 21

17.1. General Requirements. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that Consultant has secured all insurance required under this Section.

17.2. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure, maintain and keep in full force and effect for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, as follows:

17.2.1. Commercial General Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage; and if Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit: Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). If Consultant is a limited liability company, the commercial general liability coverage shall be amended so that Consultant and its managers, affiliates, employees, agents and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds;

17.2.2. Automobile Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

Coverage shall be at least as broad as Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto).

17.2.3. Workers’ Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law; and Employer’s Liability: with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease;

17.2.4. Professional Liability (or Errors and Omissions) Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain professional liability (or errors and omissions liability) insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the Effective Date of this Agreement. If a “claims made” policy is provided, then the policy shall be endorsed to provide an extended reporting period of not less than three years.

17.3. Acceptability of Insurers. The Insurance policies required under this Section shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the City.

17.4. Additional Insured.
13 of 21

17.4.1. For general liability insurance, City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the services or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work.

17.4.2. For automobile liability insurance, City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible.

17.4.3. These additional insured provisions shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.

17.5. Cancellations or Modifications to Coverage. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms supplied or approved by City to state: (i) coverage shall not be suspended, voided, reduced or canceled except after 30 days (or ten days for nonpayment) prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City; (ii) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials;

17.6. Primary and Non-Contributing. Coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage and that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents. volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it;

17.7. Separation of Insureds. Each insurance policy shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions and shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials.

17.8. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or selfinsured retentions shall be declared to and approved by City. Consultant 14 of 21
guarantees that, at the option of City, either: (i) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials; or (ii) Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses.

17.9. Waiver of Subrogation. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall expressly waive the insurer’s right of subrogation against City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials.

Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery and all rights of subrogation against City; and shall require similar express written waivers from any subcontractor.

17.10. Enforcement of Agreement Provisions (Non-Estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on City’s part to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any insurance requirement does not impose additional obligations on City, nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

17.11. City Remedy for Noncompliance. If Consultant does not maintain the policies of insurance required under this Section in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, or in the event any of Consultant’s policies do not comply with the requirements under this Section, City may either immediately terminate this Agreement or, if insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may, but has no duty to, take out the necessary insurance and pay, at Consultant’s expense, the premium thereon. Consultant shall promptly reimburse City for any premium paid by City or City may withhold amounts sufficient to pay the premiums from payments due to Consultant.

17.12. Evidence of Insurance. Prior to the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and all original endorsements evidencing and effecting the coverages required under this Section on forms satisfactory to and approved by City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and shall be on forms provided by City if requested. Consultant may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies to City. Consultant shall maintain current endorsements on file with City’s Risk Manager. All certificates and endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work commences. City also reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. Consultant shall also provide proof to City that insurance policies expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Consultant shall furnish such proof at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages. 15 of 21

17.13. Indemnity Requirements Not Limiting. Procurement of insurance by Consultant shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant’s liability or as full performance of Consultant’s duties under any provision of this Agreement.

17.14. Broader Coverage/Higher Limits. No representation is made that the minimum insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of Consultant under this Agreement. Contractor shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the Services. If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums required above, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Consultant.

17.15. Subcontractor Insurance Requirements/Pass-Through Clause.

Consultant shall require each of its subconsultants and/or subcontractors that perform Services under this Agreement to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Section. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverages and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this Section. Consultant agrees to submit all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the Services upon City’s request.

17.16. Timely Notice of Claims. Contractor shall give City prompt and timely notice of demands or claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Contractor’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required insurance policies.

18.0 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend

18.1. Indemnities.

18.1.1. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, defend, hold harmless and indemnify City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees” in this Section 18.0), from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, bid protests, stop notices, liens and losses of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to fees of accountants, attorneys and other professionals, and all costs associated therewith, and the payment of all consequential damages (collectively “Claims”), in law or equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, to property or persons, including but not limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury and property damage, in any manner arising out of, claimed to arise out of, pertaining to, or relating to the breach of this Agreement and/or any acts, errors, omissions, negligence or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, contractors, subcontractors, 16 of 21
subconsultants, materialmen, or suppliers, or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual for whom Consultant shall bear legal liability) in the performance of the Services and/or this Agreement, except to the extent the Claims arise from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the Parties.

Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Claims with counsel of the Indemnitees’ choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by the Indemnitees in connection therewith.

18.1.2. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City in accordance with Sections 9.0 and 10.0.

18.2. Subcontractor Indemnification. Consultant shall obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those in this Section 18.0 from each and every subcontractor, subconsultant, or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. If Consultant fails to obtain such indemnities, Consultant shall be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Indemnitees from and against any and all Claims in law or equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, arising out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertaining to, or relating to, the breach of this Agreement, any acts, errors, omissions, negligence or willful misconduct of Consultant’s subcontractor, its officers, agents, servants, employees, materialmen, contractors, subcontractors and/or subconsultants, or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual for whom Consultant’s subcontractor shall bear legal liability) in the performance of the Services or this Agreement, except to the extent the Claims arise from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the Parties.

18.3. Workers’ Compensation Acts Not Limiting. Consultant’s indemnification obligations under this Section, or any other provision of this Agreement, shall not be limited by the provisions of any workers’ compensation act or similar act. Consultant expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees, volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials.

18.4. Insurance Requirements Not Limiting. City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The indemnities and obligations in this Agreement shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to 17 of 21
be applicable to the Claims or Liabilities asserted against City or any of the other Indemnitees.

18.5. Survival of Terms. Consultant’s covenants and obligations under this Section 18.0 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

19.0 Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity Consultant affirmatively represents that it is an equal opportunity employer. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant covenants that it shall not discriminate, harass or retaliate against any of its employee, applicants for employment, contractors, subcontractors or subconsultants because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, military or veteran status, or any other basis prohibited by law. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate, harass or retaliate against any of City’s elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, subcontractors, or subconsultants on any such basis prohibited by law.

20.0 Labor Certification
By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

21.0 Prevailing Wage and Payroll Records
To the extent that this Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute “public works” as defined in the California Labor Code, Consultant shall comply in all respects with all applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, including those set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.

22.0 Entire Agreement
This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both Parties.

23.0 Severability
18 of 21
The invalidity in whole or in part of any provisions of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement.

24.0 Governing Law and Venue
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, except that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be applied in interpreting this Agreement. Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought by reason of, that arises out of, and/or relates to any dispute under this Agreement (whether contract, tort or both).

25.0 No Third Party Beneficiaries
This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns, and no other person or entity shall be deemed to have any rights hereunder against either party by virtue of this Agreement.

26.0 Waiver
No delay or omission to exercise any right, power or remedy accruing to City under this Agreement shall impair any right, power or remedy of City, nor shall it be construed as a waiver of, or consent to, any breach or default. No waiver of any breach, any failure of a condition, or any right or remedy under this Agreement shall be (i) effective unless it is in writing and signed by the Party making the waiver, (ii) deemed to be a waiver of, or consent to, any other breach, failure of a condition, or right or remedy, or (iii) deemed to constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing expressly so states.

27.0 Prohibited Interests; Conflict of Interest

27.1. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services.

Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant "financially interested" (as provided in California Government Code §§ 1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained.

27.2. Consultant further warrants and maintains that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working 19 of 21
exclusively for Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Nor has Consultant paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift.

27.3. Consultant warrants and maintains that it has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable laws as described in this Section.

28.0 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release
The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished or relating to Consultant’s work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City’s check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the work prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents.

29.0 Corrections
In addition to the indemnification obligations set forth above, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during City’s review of Consultant’s report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction may be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant. In addition to all other available remedies, City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by City or may withhold payment otherwise owed Consultant under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction.

30.0 Non-Appropriation of Funds
20 of 21
Payments to be made to Consultant by City for any Services performed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that City does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of Consultant’s Services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement shall cover payment for Consultant’s Services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which City appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.

31.0 Mutual Cooperation

31.1. City’s Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with all pertinent Data, documents and other requested information as is reasonably available for Consultant’s proper performance of the Services required under this Agreement.

31.2. Consultant’s Cooperation. Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City’s representative and any other agencies that may have jurisdiction or interest in the work to be performed. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance of Services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance that City requires.

32.0 Time of the Essence
Time is of the essence in respect to all provisions of this Agreement that specify a time for performance; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be construed to limit or deprive a Party of the benefits of any grace or use period allowed in this Agreement.

33.0 Attorneys' Fees
If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party all of its attorneys’ fees and other costs incurred in connection therewith.

34.0 Titles and Headings
The titles and headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement or any part of it.

35.0 Exhibits
All exhibits referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the Agreement as if set forth in full herein. In the event of any material discrepancy

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant Responsibilities

1. Film, produce, and broadcast all Seal Beach City Council Meetings and Seal Beach Planning Commission meetings, up to 48 total meetings per year. This includes live broadcasting, post-production editing (as needed), and on-demand streaming. Service levels may be modified in coordination with City staff to accommodate changes in meeting schedules or broadcast requirements. as part of the base annual contract price. For each additional meeting the City will compensate the Contractor the full cost of service.

2. Film, produce, and broadcast all Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board, and other ad hoc advisory boards as requested, up to 20 total meetings per year. These meetings may be produced using a streamlined production format (e.g., single-camera setup or audio-only feed with minimal graphics) depending on meeting location, duration, or anticipated public interest, subject to prior coordination with City staff, as part of the base annual contract price. For each additional meeting, the City will compensate the Contractor actual cost of services.

3. Coordinate and oversee programming for the Seal Beach public access television station and (SBTV-3) and the City's live-streaming platform, ensuring alignment with Public, Educational, and Government (PEG) access requirements, funding guidelines, and community interests.

4. Produce PEG content related to special events held within Seal Beach, which may include but is not limited to the Car Show, Holiday Tree Lighting, Christmas Parade, and Run Seal Beach. Programming shall prioritize coverage of Citysponsored and City produced events. The Contractor will collaborate with City departments and event organizers to identify opportunities for coverage.

5. Engage in community outreach to encourage and support PEG content development by residents, non-profit organizations, schools, and local businesses. Provide training, studio access, and technical guidance as needed to foster community-created programming.

6. Research and develop a program to upgrade audio visual production infrastructure systems to produce public meetings and community content.

Improvements related to production of City Council meetings and other City business shall be prioritized. A yearly proposed capital improvement plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to implementation of each budget cycle.

7. Follow all City purchasing policies, including but not limited to obtaining a minimum of three bids for purchase of any capital equipment and submit to the City Finance Director with a request to purchase. All recommended capital investment shall first be approved by the Consultant prior to bids being submitted to the City.

8. Obtain written consent of the City’s Public Works Director prior to making any physical changes to City buildings. All changes must comply with City permitting, safety, and accessibility requirements.

9. Ensure capital equipment is maintained in good working order, including repairs as needed. The Foundation shall notify the City of any significant maintenance or repair needs that could impact service delivery.

10.Develop protocols and policies to ensure capital equipment is safely used and properly maintained to maximize useful life. Protocols and policies shall be made available to the City for review upon request. An equipment inventory and maintenance log shall be kept and updated regularly and be submitted to the City along with the annual report.

11.Hire and retain skilled staff members to support operations of SBTV. This may include contractors, part-time technicians, or volunteers.

12.In February of each year, provide an annual report to the City of Seal Beach on activities including programming statistics, outreach efforts, and expenditures as well as a funding request for the following fiscal year.

13.In March of year, provide the City with a proposed budget for the next fiscal year to be included in the proceeding years budget proposal to be considered by the City Council.

14.Provide annual financial documentation to the City no later than August 15th of each year including:
o An itemized expenditure report for PEG funds received from the City. o A summary of any matching funds or in-kind support leveraged. o A year-end fund balance statement specific to PEG-related activities. o Inventory of equipment purchased with City funds.

City Responsibilities

1. City shall consider annual funding requests from the Consultant as a part of its annual budget process.

2. To the extent funding for capital investment is adopted in the annual budget, the Consultant may submit requests for capital purchases to the City Finance Director and IT Manager. City shall consider all requests for capital purchases in a timely manner. The IT Manager shall coordinate with SBTV to reach a mutually agreeable solution if the proposal put forth by the Contractor is found unsatisfactory. Decisions shall be documented in writing to ensure transparency and mutual understanding.

3. The Public Works Director shall review and approve any physical changes to the City owned facilities as proposed by the Foundation in a timely manner. Any approved modifications must comply with applicable building codes, safety standards, and ADA requirements.

4. City shall maintain ownership of all capital equipment purchased through the use of City funds, including but not limited to PEG funding.

5. City shall provide studio and production space to the Consultant at no cost to encourage community use and development of PEG content.

6. The City will notify the foundation no later than 48 hours prior to a needed filming date.

Shared Responsibilities and Coordination Protocols

1. Quarterly Meeting
The City and Consultant shall meet at least once quarterly to discuss programming goals, equipment needs, community engagement efforts, and any upcoming City events that may warrant SBTV coverage. During this meeting the City will provide an update to the Foundation regarding services.

2. Program and Coverage Scheduling
The Consultant shall provide the City with a quarterly programming schedule that outlines planned coverage of public meetings and community events. The City shall notify the Consultant of special meeting needs or schedule changes as early as possible.

3. Mutual Review of Capital Plans
The Consultant and City IT Manager shall collaborate on evaluating the condition of production equipment annually and work together to identify and prioritize necessary capital improvements. This includes discussing emerging technologies or upgrades that may improve production quality or expand community access.

4. Emergency or After-Hours Coordination
In the event of a last-minute or emergency public meeting or announcement requiring broadcast, the City shall contact the Consultant’s designated on-call staff member. The Consultant will make best efforts to accommodate such requests, and any additional costs incurred will be discussed and agreed upon in writing.

5. Compliance with PEG and Legal Standards
Consultant has responsibility to ensure that all SBTV-3 programming and operations comply with Public, Educational, and Government (PEG) access requirements, copyright laws, and applicable City, State, and Federal regulations.

EXHIBIT B

TERMS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW REQUIREMENTS

1. This Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute “public works” as defined in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code (“Chapter 1”). Further, Consultant acknowledges that this Agreement is subject to (a) Chapter 1 and (b) the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. Therefore, as to those Services that are “public works”, Consultant shall comply with and be bound by all the terms, rules and regulations described in 1(a) and 1(b) as though set forth in full herein.

2. California law requires the inclusion of specific Labor Code provisions in certain contracts. The inclusion of such specific provisions below, whether or not required by California law, does not alter the meaning or scope of Section 1 above.

3. Consultant shall be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1725.5, and has provided proof of registration to City prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform work with any subcontractor that is not registered with DIR pursuant to Section 1725.5. Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain their registration with the DIR in effect throughout the duration of this Agreement. If Consultant or any subcontractor ceases to be registered with DIR at any time during the duration of the project, Consultant shall immediately notify City.

4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, Consultant’s Services are subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by DIR regulations.

5. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Agreement are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request.

Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of such prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post such rates at each job site covered by this Agreement.

6. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor.

7. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subcontractor to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform City of the location of the records.

8. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program.

Within 60 days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subcontractors shall submit to City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.

9. Consultant shall not perform work with any Subcontractor that has been debarred or suspended pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777.1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. Consultant and subcontractors shall not be debarred or suspended throughout the duration of this Contract pursuant to Labor Code Section 1777.1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. If Consultant or any subcontractor becomes debarred or suspended during the duration of the project, Consultant shall immediately notify City.

10. Consultant acknowledges that eight hours labor constitutes a legal day’s work.

Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $25.00 for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay.

11. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Consultant hereby certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”

12. For every subcontractor who will perform work on the project, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor’s compliance with Chapter 1 and Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700, and Consultant shall include in the written contract between it and each subcontractor a copy of those statutory provisions and a requirement that each subcontractor shall comply with those statutory provisions. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor’s compliance, including without limitation, conducting a periodic review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor and upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages.

Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any failure.

13. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend (at Consultant’s expense with counsel reasonably acceptable to City) City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents and independent contractors serving in the role of City officials, and volunteers from and against any demand or claim for damages, compensation, fines, penalties or other amounts arising out of or incidental to any acts or omissions listed above by any person or entity (including Consultant, its subcontractors, and each of their officials, officers, employees and agents) in connection with any work undertaken or in connection with the Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, attorneys’ fees, and other related costs and expenses. All duties of Consultant under this Section shall survive the termination of the Agreement.

Agenda Item K

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 23, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
THRU: Patrick Gallegos, City Manager
FROM: Iris Lee, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Consideration of the Transportation Development Impact Fee Update, including a Nexus Study, Capital Improvement Program, and Updated Rates
________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF REQUEST:

That the City Council:

1. Conduct the public hearing; and,

2. Adopt Resolution 7744, approving the Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study, dated December 15, 2025, adopting the capital improvement program as part of the Nexus Study, adopting the Transportation Impact Development Fee rate amounts, and making a finding of exemption under CEQA.

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:

Background:

California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. enables local agencies to charge development impact fees, or mitigation fees, to offset impacts caused by new development. A mitigation fee is a monetary exaction imposed by a government agency upon an applicant seeking approval for a development project.

The fee is applied towards the cost of transportation-related public infrastructure within the jurisdiction and is not a tax or special assessment. The fee is to be used to finance those improvements to mitigate future transportation facility and program needs created by such developments.

Government Code Section 66001 (the Mitigation Fee Act) requires specific nexus requirements to be satisfied for fees related to transportation mitigation improvements, including:
(1) Identify the purpose of the fee.

(2) Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specified in Section 65403 or 66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the public facilities for which the fee is charged.
(3) Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. (4) Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

In September 2021, the State of California adopted Assembly Bill (AB) 602, which included new Government Code Section 66016.5 and created several new requirements related to the development and implementation of impact fee programs, including a requirement that fees applied to residential uses be proportional to each unit’s square footage and a requirement to adopt a capital improvement program along with the nexus study. The Fees must be used to fund capital improvements due to new growth and cannot be used to address existing deficiencies or ongoing maintenance. Fees must also have a nexus and rough proportionality with the impacts of new development under AB 1600, as recently clarified by AB 602, and constitutional principles. Among other requirements, the updated fees are to be based on the cost and quantity of capital improvements needed to maintain existing service standards, and the incremental impact of each development on the transportation infrastructure.

Transportation Impact Development Fee Update:

The City’s Transportation Impact Development Fee (Fee) program is codified in the Seal Beach Municipal Code Chapter 4.10.

This Fee Update was based on the Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study Update (Nexus Study), dated December 15, 2025, by Iteris, Inc. The Nexus Study established a reasonable relationship between the impact fee and its intended use.

Existing and future year intersection traffic operations are evaluated during typical weekday peak hour conditions. Intersection improvements need to accommodate the future traffic demand resulting from buildout of the Adopted Housing Element, as well as maintain City traffic operations standards. The City’s Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) and Safety Action Plan (SAP) were also utilized to identify capital improvement program (CIP) improvement needed to accommodate the safety needs of future traffic demand. Utilizing unit costs for construction, planninglevel cost estimates were prepared for the intersection improvements.

The net final total cost to improve the City’s transportation system at full buildout of anticipated developments (e.g., Housing Element projections), is estimated at approximately $2,122,308. The Fee was calculated by dividing the total costs of

the improvements by the expected net daily trips forecast to be generated from the projected new development within the City. The final maximum Fee, assuming the net transportation improvement cost of $2,122,308 required by the addition of 7,065 new daily trips forecast under buildout conditions, is $300.39 per daily trip.

This calculation assumes that all “trips” are expected to equally contribute to the need for the improvements, regardless of the land use types that generate the trips, per the City’s adopted daily trip generation rates.

Proposed Traffic Impact Fee Schedule:

Based on the cost per daily trip calculated, the following are the recommended traffic impact fee per land use type:
• Retail/Shopping Center: $16.36 per square foot of gross leasable area • General Office Building: $3.26 per square foot of gross leasable area • Restaurant: $25.18 per square foot of gross leasable area • Hotel: $2,400 per room
• Single-family Residential*: $1.61 per livable square foot • Multi-family Residential*: $1.58 per livable square foot • Other Land Use Types: $300.39 per daily trip generated *Assuming an average single family residential detached unit to be 1,757 square feet, and multi-family residential unit to be 861 square feet.

For the Fee to stay current with changing labor and material costs, the Fee will be adjusted annually in July of each calendar year beginning in 2026, using the California Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the twelve-month period ending in May, or a similar published index if the CCI is no longer available. Annual adjustments will be effective July 1 of each year.

Further, an Administration Fee in the not to exceed amount of two percent (2%) of the total project cost for the management of the Fee program will be included.

The Fee will take effect 60 days after adoption of Resolution 7744.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

Approval of a resolution updating development impact fees is not a “project” within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) and other provisions of the state CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that the governmental fiscal activity will not have a significant effect on the environment
LEGAL ANALYSIS:

The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the resolution as to form.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no financial impact on the City for the implementation of this program.

While the updated Fees will provide funding for transportation-related programs, actual Fee revenues collected are uncertain and will depend on the level of new development in the City.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is not applicable to the Strategic Plan.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council:

1. Conduct the public hearing; and,

2. Adopt Resolution 7744, approving the Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study, dated December 15, 2025, adopting the capital improvement program as part of the Nexus Study, adopting the Transportation Impact Development Fee rate amounts, and making a finding of exemption under CEQA.

SUBMITTED BY: NOTED AND APPROVED:

Iris Lee Patrick Gallegos
Iris Lee, Director of Public Works Patrick Gallegos, City Manager ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution 7744
B. Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study Update,
dated December 15, 2025
RESOLUTION 7744

A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL

APPROVING A TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY,

ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AS

PART OF THE NEXUS STUDY, ESTABLISHING THE

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT DEVELOPMENT FEE

AMOUNT, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION

UNDER CEQA
WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act, contained in Government Code 66000 et seq., permits the City to impose development impact fees on new development for the purposes of funding public facilities necessary to serve that new development; and, WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach conducted a comprehensive Traffic Impact Nexus Study Update prepared by Iteris, Inc. (Iteris), dated December 15, 2025, included as Exhibit A to this Resolution (Nexus Study), to fund transportation infrastructure improvements associated with new development; and,
WHEREAS, development impact fees are monetary exactions, other than taxes or special assessments, charged to applicants in connection with approval of a development project, with the purpose to defray all or part of the cost of public facilities related to new development; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the Transportation impact Development Fees pursuant to Chapter 4.10 of the Seal Beach Municipal Code on commercial, industrial and residential development projects to fund the cost of transportation infrastructure improvements within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Nexus Study provides the documentation, detail, and other information required by the Mitigation Fee Act as the basis for the adoption and imposition of the development impact fee. Furthermore, the Nexus Study describes the benefit and impact area on which the development impact fee is to be imposed, lists specific public improvements to be financed through the imposition and collection of the development impact fee, describes the estimated cost of providing the improvements and facilities, describes the reasonable relationship between the development impact fee and the various types of new development, and otherwise satisfies the requirements of the law with regard to the imposition and collection of development impact fees; and, WHEREAS, the collection of development impact fees is projected to generate funding for future transportation facility and program needs, supporting the City’s ability to maintain adopted service standards; and,
WHEREAS, the City has complied with the notice and hearing requirements of state law and the Mitigation Fee Act prior to adopting the Nexus Study, Capital Improvement Plan, and the fee specified in this Resolution, and a notice of public hearing on the development impact fee was published in accordance with law and mailed as required by law to any interested party who filed a written request with the City Clerk for mailed notice of a meeting on new or increased fees; and,
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on February 23, 2026 in the Council Chambers at 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the development impact fee established herein, and finds that the fee will mitigate some of the impacts associated with additional capital and infrastructure needs necessitated by new development in the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Seal Beach City Council does resolve, declare, determine, and order as follows:

Section 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts and recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated as a material part of this Resolution.

Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the Nexus Study, and the findings contained therein.

Section 3. The Council hereby approves the updated Transportation Impact Development Fee rates as set forth in this Resolution. Notwithstanding any guidance for calculating the Transportation Impact Development Fees in Chapter 4.10 (Transportation Impact Development Fee), the rates set forth in this Resolution and as further explained in the Nexus Study shall control.

The Seal Beach Fee Schedule shall be amended to contain the following fees and amounts identified below.
• Retail/Shopping Center: $16.36 per square foot of gross leasable area • General Office Building: $3.26 per square foot of gross leasable area • Restaurant: $25.18 per square foot of gross leasable area • Hotel: $2,400 per room
• Single-family Residential: $1.61 per livable square foot • Multi-family Residential: $1.58 per livable square foot • Other Land Use Types: $300.39 per daily trip generated Section 4. The City Council adopts the methodology set forth in the Nexus Study for calculating and collecting the development impact fee adopted herein.

Notwithstanding any guidance for calculating the Transportation Impact Development Fees in Chapter 4.10 (Transportation Impact Development Fee), the rates set forth in Section 3 of this Resolution, and as further explained in the Nexus Study shall control. The development impact fee shall be adjusted annually in July of each calendar year beginning in 2026, using the California Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the twelve-month period ending in May, or a similar published index if the CCI is no longer available. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to make such annual adjustments to certain fees based on an inflationary factor effective July 1 of each year.

Section 5. The Transportation Impact Development Fee shall be paid when required by the applicable provisions of the Seal Beach Municipal Code and in accordance with Government Code section 66007 and the remainder of the Mitigation Fee Act.

Section 6. The Transportation Impact Development Fee shall be effective on the sixtieth (60th) day following the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 7. The City shall include an Administration Fee in the not to exceed amount of two percent (2%) of the total project cost for the management of the development impact fee program.

Section 8. The City Council hereby adopts the Capital Improvement Program set forth in Section 4.0 in the Nexus Study.

Section 9. Nothing in this Resolution shall repeal, amend or supersede any other City imposed fees except for the development impact fee addressed in the Nexus Study and expressly established by this Resolution.

Section 10. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Resolution shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Resolution, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of this Resolution be declared invalid or unenforceable.

Section 11. The City Council hereby finds that the approval of the Nexus Study, adoption of the Capital Improvement Program, and the establishment of the Transportation Development Impact are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of State CEQA Guidelines because these actions involve the adoption of development impact fees and no specific development is authorized by the adoption of the Nexus Study, Capital Improvement Program, or the adoption of new or updated development impact fees. Furthermore, the Capital Improvement Program is a prioritizing and funding allocation program and cannot and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. No physical activity will occur until all required environmental reviews are conducted at the time the physical improvements prioritized in the Capital Improvement Program are undertaken at a future unspecified date. Therefore, the approval of the Nexus Study, Capital Improvement Program associated with the Nexus Study, and adoption of the development impact fee does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. In addition, the adoption of this Resolution approves and sets forth a procedure for determining fees for the purpose of obtaining funds for capital projects and equipment necessary to maintain service within existing service areas and is statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15273(a)(4). Also, approval of the Capital Improvement Program associated with the Nexus Study, is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) because the Program is not a “project” as defined by CEQA, but involves the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities that do not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of February 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members
NOES: Council Members
ABSENT: Council Members
ABSTAIN: Council Members

Lisa Landau, Mayor
ATTEST:

Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
I, Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution 7744 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of February 2026.

Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk
Attachment:

Exhibit A - Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study Update, dated December 15, 2025
Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | i
Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
December 15, 2025
Submitted to:

J# 12695 | Prepared by Iteris, Inc.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.0 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 2

1.1 California Mitigation Fee Act ................................................................................................................ 2

2.0 Travel Demand Forecasting ...................................................................................................................... 3

3.0 Traffic Operations Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 5

3.1 Traffic Volumes..................................................................................................................................... 5

3.2 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 6

3.3 Future Year Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 9

4.0 Traffic Impact Fee Project List ................................................................................................................ 13

5.0 Improvement Project Cost Estimates ..................................................................................................... 16

5.1 Unit Costs ........................................................................................................................................... 16

5.2 Intersection Improvement Cost Estimates ......................................................................................... 16

5.3 Improvement Cost Summary ............................................................................................................. 18

6.0 Traffic Impact Fee ................................................................................................................................... 19

6.1 Cost Increases Over Time ................................................................................................................... 19

6.2 Final Fee Schedule .............................................................................................................................. 19

6.2 Comparison With Other Jurisdictions ................................................................................................ 20 Appendix A – California Mitigation Fee Act
Appendix B – Traffic Count Data
Appendix C – LOS Calculation Sheets
Appendix D – Intersection Cost Estimates
Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 1

SUMMARY
The purpose of this traffic impact fee nexus study is to outline the methodology used and summarize the findings of a study conducted by Iteris, Inc. (Iteris) to update the Traffic Impact Fee for the City of Seal Beach.

The funds from the Traffic Impact Fee are intended for transportation infrastructure improvements to address projected deficiencies and unacceptable traffic conditions anticipated from new development associated with the buildout of the City's General Plan Housing Element, adopted on February 7, 2022. This report clarifies the purpose of the fee and establishes a reasonable relationship (nexus) between the fee and its intended use.

Existing and future year 2050 intersection traffic operations are evaluated during typical weekday peak hour conditions. Intersection improvements need to accommodate the future traffic demand resulting from buildout of the Adopted Housing Element, as well as maintain City traffic operations standards. The City’s Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) and Safety Action Plan (SAP) were also utilized to identify infrastructure improvement needed to accommodate the safety needs of future traffic demand. Utilizing unit costs for construction, planning-level cost estimates were prepared for the intersection improvements.

The net final total cost to improve the City’s transportation system at full buildout of the Housing Element, is estimated at approximately $2,122,308. The Traffic Impact Fee was calculated by dividing the total costs of the improvements by the expected net daily trips forecast to be generated from new development within the City by buildout of the General Plan land uses. The final maximum traffic impact fee, assuming the net transportation improvement cost of $2,122,308 required by the addition of 7,065 new daily trips forecast under General Plan buildout conditions, is $300.39 per daily trip. This calculation assumes that all “trips” are expected to equally contribute to the need for the improvements, regardless of the land use types that generate the trips, per the City’s adopted daily trip generation rates.

Note that the fees to be collected as a result of this updated traffic impact fee nexus study are supplementary to the specific fees and conditions imposed upon individual development projects by the City. All requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act in California Government Code Section 66001 need to be met by this nexus study.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 2

1.0 METHODOLOGY
The purpose of this traffic impact fee nexus study is to describe the methodology used for, and summarize the recent results of, a study conducted by Iteris. Inc. (Iteris) to update the Traffic Impact Fee in the City of Seal Beach. The Traffic Impact Fee funds are intended for transportation infrastructure improvements aimed at relieving projected deficiencies and adverse mobility conditions forecast to be caused by new development associated with buildout of the City’s General Plan. This report identifies the purpose of the fee and demonstrates a reasonable relationship (nexus) between the fee and the purpose for which it is to be collected.

1.1 California Mitigation Fee Act
New development lays the groundwork for population increases and job opportunities within the City.

However, as population and employment increase, the need for planning and implementing circulation system improvements also increases.

California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. enables local agencies to charge development impact fees, or mitigation fees. A mitigation fee is a monetary exaction imposed by a government agency upon an applicant seeking approval for a development project. The fee is applied towards the cost of traffic-related public infrastructure improvements within the jurisdiction, and is not a tax or special assessment. The fee is to be used to finance only those circulation system improvements which are related to the type of development that will generate an increase in traffic.

The Mitigation Fee Act requirements in California Government Code Section 66001 require specific nexus requirements to be satisfied for fees related to traffic mitigation improvements. These requirements include:
66001. (a) In any action establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project by a local agency, the local agency shall do all of the following:
(1) Identify the purpose of the fee.
(2) Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specified in Section 65403 or 66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the public facilities for which the fee is charged.
(3) Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
(4) Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

Appendix A includes a complete version of California Government Code Section 66000-66008.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 3

2.0 TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING
This section describes the methodology used to forecast the future traffic volumes that are expected to be generated by the buildout of the City’s General Plan land uses. Iteris utilized the Orange County Traffic Analysis Model (OCTAM), prepared by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), to develop the future year traffic forecasts. OCTAM is consistent with Orange County Projections (OCP) socioeconomic data and is OCTA’s preferred model for Orange County projects. The OCTAM consists of a base year 2019 scenario and future year 2050 scenario. The model features a detailed Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) system within the City consisting of 14 zones, as shown in Figure 1. The future year land use (i.e., socioeconomic data) within OCTAM was reviewed to ensure that it reflected current City plans. In the standard OCTAM model, TAZ 466 includes both the Rossmoor shopping center (located inside the City of Seal Beach) as well as a southern portion of the Rossmoor residential development (located outside the City). To isolate traffic volumes generated solely within the City of Seal Beach, the Rossmoor residential development located outside the City was reallocated from TAZ 466 to TAZ 465 which is located just north of the City.

In the 2050 scenario, additional residential units were added to the OCTAM 2050 socioeconomic data inputs as shown in Table 1 to reflect dwelling units required in Seal Beach’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA allocation is 1,243 units, however, the Housing Element provides opportunity sites totaling 1,544 dwelling units.

Table 1: RHNA Housing units added to 2050 OCTAM
TAZ RHNA Units
466 400
657 320
658 75
659 150
661 59
662 294
663 40
664 86
667 120
Total 1,544
Forecast traffic volumes were then postprocessed using traffic counts and the growth in traffic volumes between 2019 and 2050 consistent with the postprocessing methodology used in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 255. The postprocessed volumes were provided as input to the operational analysis.

Since only a subset of the study intersections are included in the OCTAM highway network, the growth in postprocessed traffic volumes from the major through streets was applied to the adjacent intermediate locations.

Figure 1
OCTAM TAZ Structure in Seal Beach

OCTAM TAZ
Legend
405
City of Seal Beach
Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study
Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 5

3.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
This section presents the evaluation of intersection operations within the City in existing and future year conditions, along with the methodology used for the evaluation.

3.1 Methodology
Intersections are typically considered the most critical locations for traffic flow bottlenecks and congestion on roadways with interrupted traffic flow, since the right-of-way must be shared by opposing traffic streams, creating conflicting traffic movements. The quality of traffic operations is characterized using the concept of level of service (LOS). Level of service is defined by a range of grades from A (best) to F (worst). At intersections, LOS “A” represents relatively free operating conditions with little or no delay. LOS “F” is characterized by extremely unstable flow conditions and severe congestion with volumes at or near the intersection’s design capacity. This results in long queues at the intersection approaches. Table 2 outlines the LOS concept for intersections using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology, which is based on average vehicle delay, and the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology, which is based on the “sum of critical lane volumes” using a Volume-to-Capacity (V/C) ratio scale.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 6
Table 2: Intersection Level of Service Definitions – HCM and ICU Methodology Level
of
Service
Description
Signalized
Intersection
Delay
(seconds per
vehicle)
Unsignalized
Intersection
Delay
(seconds per
vehicle)
Volume‐to‐
Capacity
Ratio
(Signalized
Intersections)
A
Excellent operation. All approaches to the intersection appear quite open, turning movements are easily made,
and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation.
≤ 10 < 10 Under 0.60
B
Very good operation. Many drivers begin to feel
somewhat restricted within platoons of vehicles. This
represents stable flow. An approach to an intersection
may occasionally be fully utilized and traffic queues start to form.
>10-20 >10 and < 15 0.61 to 0.70
C
Good operation. Occasionally drivers may have to wait
more than 60 seconds, and back-ups may develop behind
turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. >20-35 >15 and < 25 0.71 to 0.80
D
Fair operation. Cars are sometimes required to wait more than 60 seconds during short peaks. There are no longstanding traffic queues. >35-55 >25 and < 35 0.81 to 0.90
E
Poor operation. Some long-standing vehicular queues
develop on critical approaches to intersections. Delays may be up to several minutes.
>55-80 >35 and < 50 0.91 to 1.00
F
Forced flow. Represents jammed conditions. Backups
form locations downstream or on the cross street may
restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the
intersection approach lanes; therefore, volumes carried are not predictable. Potential for stop and go type traffic flow.
>80 > 50 Exceeds 1.00
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Sixth Edition, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016

3.2 Existing Conditions
This section presents the methodology for developing existing traffic volumes and describes the current intersection LOS operations. Consistent with the analyses performed under the General Plan and EIR process, level of service conditions were analyzed for twenty-eight (28) key intersections in the City during morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hours. Figure 2 displays the locations of the 28 study intersections.

Traffic Volumes
Existing traffic volumes at the study intersections are based on a combination of traffic counts provided by the City and new traffic counts collected in February 2025. The City provided traffic counts at 24 intersections (collected during various years between 2021 and 2024). New traffic counts were collected at the remaining 4 locations in February 2025. All counts were conducted during morning (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and evening (4:00 to 6:00 PM) peak periods. The traffic analysis utilizes the highest single hour of traffic volumes from each peak period at each intersection. Detailed traffic count data are included in Appendix B.

Figure 2
Study Intersections
405
N

NOT TO SCALE
Study Intersection
City Boundary
3 7
5 6
8 11
12 13
16 15
14 18
20 X
24 25 26
23 17
27 28
19 1 2
4 9
10 21 22
1 Leisure World
22 Old Ranch Golf
Center
Seal Beach Blvd
Pacific Coast
Bolsa Chica St
Studebaker Rd
Westminister Blvd
Seal Beach Blvd
Hwy
1st St
City of Seal Beach
Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study
Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 8
Note that the count data, representing various years, was not escalated for use in this analysis, as the counts were collected within a recent timeframe. In addition, new development levels in the past few years were considered to be minimal.

Intersection Levels of Service
This section summarizes the existing conditions intersection LOS and delay during a typical weekday AM and PM peak hours. Table 3 summarizes the existing weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic operating conditions at each study intersection. The LOS specified in the table is based on delay because the delay-based method provides a more comprehensive evaluation of lane groups and signal timing opportunities. Detailed LOS calculation sheets are provided in Appendix C.

Table 3: Existing Intersection Peak Hour LOS
Intersection Traffic Control
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
LOS Delay
(s)
ICU
(V/C) LOS Delay (s)
ICU
(V/C)
1 1st St/Marina Dr Stop-controlled A 8.5 N/A B 10.4 N/A 2 5th St/Marina Dr Stop-controlled A 7.9 N/A A 9.0 N/A
3 Seal Beach Blvd/Bradbury Rd Signalized B 15.8 0.55 B 13.5 0.58 4 Seal Beach Blvd/Rossmoor Center Wy Signalized A 5.1 0.45 B 12.2 0.59 5 Seal Beach Blvd/Towne Center Dr Signalized A 4.5 0.44 B 16.2 0.65 6 Seal Beach Blvd/St Cloud Dr Signalized C 20.6 0.61 C 21.6 0.61 7 Seal Beach Blvd/Lampson Ave Signalized C 23.1 0.67 B 19.2 0.64 8 Seal Beach Blvd/Old Ranch Pkwy-405 NB Ramps* Signalized B 15.4 0.50 B 14.1 0.63 9 Seal Beach Blvd/Gate Rd-405 SB Ramps* Signalized C 32.7 0.69 C 24.7 0.73 10 Seal Beach Blvd/Golden Rain Rd (WB) Signalized A 5.8 0.41 A 5.6 0.62 11 Seal Beach Blvd/Golden Rain Rd (EB) Signalized A 4.7 0.41 A 9.1 0.62 12 Seal Beach Blvd/St Andrews Dr Signalized A 2.2 0.42 A 6.9 0.48 13 Seal Beach Blvd/Westminster Ave Signalized D 38.3 0.63 D 45.7 0.78 14 Seal Beach Blvd/Road C Signalized A 4.1 0.33 A 1.4 0.31 15 Seal Beach Blvd/Apollo Dr Signalized A 1.7 0.31 A 1.3 0.32 16 Seal Beach Blvd/Adolfo Lopez Dr Signalized A 0.7 0.31 A 1.8 0.31 17 Seal Beach Blvd/Heron Point Signalized A 4.5 0.40 A 4.2 0.37 18 Seal Beach Blvd/Bolsa Ave Signalized B 16.5 0.58 B 17.1 0.64 19 Seal Beach Blvd/Marlin Ave Stop-controlled C 18.4 N/A C 16.0 N/A 20 Seal Beach Blvd/Pacific Coast Hwy* Signalized C 30.5 0.63 D 44.0 0.74 21 Old Ranch Plaza/Lampson Ave Signalized A 4.1 0.37 A 4.6 0.41 22 Basswood St/Lampson Ave Signalized B 11.4 0.46 A 8.9 0.43 23 Candleberry Ave/Lampson Ave Signalized A 7.4 0.35 A 4.2 0.33 Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 9
Intersection Traffic Control
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
LOS Delay
(s)
ICU
(V/C) LOS Delay (s)
ICU
(V/C)
24 Heather St/Lampson Ave Signalized A 5.7 0.40 A 4.3 0.43 25 Rose St/Lampson Ave Signalized A 4.1 0.36 A 3.9 0.44 26 Tulip St/Lampson Ave Signalized A 4.6 0.44 A 3.7 0.46 27 Apollo Dr/Westminster Ave Signalized A 5.1 0.44 A 7.0 0.45 28 Kitts Hwy/Westminster Ave Signalized A 5.7 0.46 A 4.1 0.49 Notes:
* Intersection operated by Caltrans
LOS = Level of Service, s = seconds.

ICU values are shown for informational purposes. LOS values are based on the average vehicle delay.

As shown in Table 3, all intersections are currently operating at LOS D or better. The following intersections operate at a LOS D:
 Seal Beach Boulevard/Westminster Avenue; and
 Seal Beach Boulevard/Pacific Coast Highway (Caltrans intersection).

3.3 Future Year Conditions
This section presents the methodology for developing future traffic volumes and describes the resulting intersection LOS operations. Consistent with the analyses performed under the General Plan and EIR process, level of service conditions were analyzed for twenty-eight (28) key intersections in the City for the morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hours.

Traffic Volumes
Future traffic volumes were generated for both the AM and PM peak hours. As mentioned, a subset (nine) of the study intersections are included in the OCTAM model, which was used to model link B-turn postprocess adjustments to existing traffic count data. The overall volume growth between 2025 and 2050 volumes at those nine intersections was then calculated for each time period. This volume growth was then used to grow the primary/major through movements at the remaining seventeen (17) study intersections. Lastly, all volumes were rounded up to the nearest 5 trips.

Intersection Levels of Service
This section summarizes the future year conditions intersection LOS and delay during a typical weekday AM and PM peak hour. Table 4 summarizes the future weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic operating conditions at each study intersection. Detailed LOS calculation sheets are provided in Appendix D.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 10
Table 4: Future Year Intersection Peak Hour LOS
Intersection
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
LOS Delay
(s) ICU LOS Delay (s) ICU
1 1st St/Marina Dr A 9.0 N/A B 12.2 N/A
2 5th St/Marina Dr A 8.3 N/A A 9.3 N/A
3 Seal Beach Blvd/Bradbury Rd B 15.6 0.56 B 14.0 0.59
4 Seal Beach Blvd/Rossmoor Center Wy B 10.6 0.53 B 15.7 0.63 5 Seal Beach Blvd/Towne Center Dr A 4.6 0.45 B 16.0 0.67 6 Seal Beach Blvd/St Cloud Dr C 20.8 0.62 C 21.7 0.63
7 Seal Beach Blvd/Lampson Ave C 22.2 0.68 B 19.9 0.66
8 Seal Beach Blvd/Old Ranch Pkwy-405 NB Ramps* B 15.5 0.52 B 14.3 0.66 9 Seal Beach Blvd/Gate Rd-405 SB Ramps* C 34.8 0.71 C 24.9 0.74 10 Seal Beach Blvd/Golden Rain Rd (WB) A 6.1 0.43 A 5.8 0.65 11 Seal Beach Blvd/Golden Rain Rd (EB) A 4.5 0.43 A 9.2 0.65 12 Seal Beach Blvd/St Andrews Dr A 2.8 0.43 A 7.8 0.49
13 Seal Beach Blvd/Westminster Ave D 39.8 0.62 D 43.0 0.71 14 Seal Beach Blvd/Road C A 4.8 0.34 A 2.1 0.32
15 Seal Beach Blvd/Apollo Dr A 0.4 0.31 A 0.2 0.31
16 Seal Beach Blvd/Adolfo Lopez Dr A 1.1 0.31 A 1.4 0.33 17 Seal Beach Blvd/Heron Point A 4.0 0.41 A 5.4 0.38
18 Seal Beach Blvd/Bolsa Ave B 16.4 0.61 B 17.2 0.65
19 Seal Beach Blvd/Marlin Ave C 19.7 N/A C 17.0 N/A
20 Seal Beach Blvd/Pacific Coast Hwy* D 35.3 0.66 E 76.1 0.86 21 Old Ranch Plaza/Lampson Ave A 4.4 0.39 A 4.9 0.42
22 Basswood St/Lampson Ave B 11.6 0.48 A 8.9 0.46
23 Candleberry Ave/Lampson Ave A 7.5 0.36 A 4.2 0.34
24 Heather St/Lampson Ave A 5.7 0.41 A 4.9 0.44
25 Rose St/Lampson Ave A 4.2 0.36 A 4.0 0.45
26 Tulip St/Lampson Ave A 5.2 0.45 A 3.9 0.48
27 Apollo Dr/Westminster Ave A 5.1 0.46 A 7.1 0.47
28 Kitts Hwy/Westminster Ave A 6.9 0.49 A 4.5 0.51
* Intersection operated by Caltrans
Notes:

LOS = Level of Service, s = seconds.

ICU values are shown for informational purposes. LOS values are based on the average vehicle delay.

As shown in Table 4, the majority of the study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at LOS D or better. The intersection of Seal Beach Boulevard/Pacific Coast Highway degraded to a deficient LOS E.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 11
Additionally, LOS degradation was observed at the Seal Beach Boulevard/Rossmoor Way intersection, but the intersection would still operate at LOS B in the AM and PM.

For the PM peak period, the Seal Beach Boulevard/Pacific Coast Highway intersection is forecast to degrade from LOS D under existing conditions to LOS E under future conditions. The movements experiencing the most significant delay increases for future year conditions are the eastbound left-turn and northbound through movements. The volumes for the eastbound left-turn and northbound thru movements are projected to increase by 47% and 134%, respectively, for the future PM peak period, resulting in increased signal delay. The future year intersection Volume-to-Capacity ratio (V/C) is 1.85 for the eastbound left-turn and 1.05 for the northbound through movements. The following strategies may be applied to reduce the delay and to improve intersection LOS:
 Adjust signal timing to accommodate new traffic patterns.  Add a second eastbound left-turn lane by modifying existing raised median.

For the PM peak period, Seal Beach Boulevard between Town Center Drive and St Cloud Drive experiences large turning movement demands. Both intersections experience delay on the westbound left turn movements that can be mitigated by modified signal phasing operations. The following strategies may be applied to reduce turning movement delay at these locations.
 Install additional westbound left turn lane at the intersection of Towne Center and Seal Beach Boulevard.
 Adjust phasing to protected left-turn phasing.

Table 5 summarizes the comparison of the existing and future year traffic operations (LOS and delay).

Table 5: Existing vs Future Year Intersection Peak Hour LOS Comparison Intersection
AM Peak Hour
LOS – Delay (s)
PM Peak Hour
LOS ‐Delay (s)
Existing Future
Year Existing Future Year
1 1st St/Marina Dr A - 8.5 A - 9.0 B - 10.4 B - 12.2
2 5th St/Marina Dr A - 7.9 A - 8.3 A – 9.0 A - 9.3
3 Seal Beach Blvd/Bradbury Rd B - 15.8 B - 15.6 B - 13.5 B - 14.0 4 Seal Beach Blvd/Rossmoor Center Wy A - 5.1 B - 10.6 B - 12.2 B - 15.7 5 Seal Beach Blvd/Towne Center Dr A - 4.5 A - 4.6 B - 16.2 B - 16.0 6 Seal Beach Blvd/St Cloud Dr C - 20.6 C - 20.8 C - 21.6 C - 21.7 7 Seal Beach Blvd/Lampson Ave C - 23.1 C - 22.2 B - 19.2 B - 19.9 8 Seal Beach Blvd/Old Ranch Pkwy-405 NB Ramps* B - 15.4 B - 15.5 B - 14.1 B - 14.3 9 Seal Beach Blvd/Gate Rd-405 SB Ramps* C - 32.7 C - 34.8 C - 24.7 C - 24.9 10 Seal Beach Blvd/Golden Rain Rd (WB) A - 5.8 A - 6.1 A - 5.6 A - 5.8 11 Seal Beach Blvd/Golden Rain Rd (EB) A - 4.7 A - 4.5 A - 9.1 A - 9.2 12 Seal Beach Blvd/St Andrews Dr A - 2.2 A - 2.8 A - 6.9 A - 7.8 13 Seal Beach Blvd/Westminster Ave D - 38.3 D - 39.8 D - 45.7 D - 43.0 Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 12
Intersection
AM Peak Hour
LOS – Delay (s)
PM Peak Hour
LOS ‐Delay (s)
Existing Future
Year Existing Future Year
14 Seal Beach Blvd/Road C A - 4.1 A - 4.8 A - 1.4 A - 2.1 15 Seal Beach Blvd/Apollo Dr A - 1.7 A - 0.4 A - 1.3 A - 0.2 16 Seal Beach Blvd/Adolfo Lopez Dr A - 0.7 A - 1.1 A - 1.8 A - 1.4 17 Seal Beach Blvd/Heron Point A - 4.5 A - 4.0 A - 4.2 A - 5.4 18 Seal Beach Blvd/Bolsa Ave B - 16.5 B - 16.4 B - 17.1 B - 17.2 19 Seal Beach Blvd/Marlin Ave C - 18.4 C - 19.7 C - 16.0 C - 17 20 Seal Beach Blvd/Pacific Coast Hwy* C - 30.5 D - 35.3 D - 44.0 E - 76.1 21 Old Ranch Plaza/Lampson Ave A - 4.1 A - 4.4 A - 4.6 A - 4.9 22 Basswood St/Lampson Ave B - 11.4 B - 11.6 A - 8.9 A - 8.9 23 Candleberry Ave/Lampson Ave A - 7.4 A - 7.5 A - 4.2 A - 4.2 24 Heather St/Lampson Ave A - 5.7 A - 5.7 A - 4.3 A - 4.9 25 Rose St/Lampson Ave A - 4.1 A - 4.2 A - 3.9 A - 4.0
26 Tulip St/Lampson Ave A - 4.6 A - 5.2 A - 3.7 A - 3.9 27 Apollo Dr/Westminster Ave A - 5.1 A - 5.1 A - 7.0 A - 7.1 28 Kitts Hwy/Westminster Ave A - 5.7 A - 6.9 A - 4.1 A - 4.5 * Intersection operated by Caltrans
Notes:

LOS = Level of Service, s = seconds.

Note that at a few locations, the average intersection vehicle delay is forecast to be slightly reduced in the future year scenario as compared to the existing conditions scenario. This is due to a reduction in volumes at certain intersection movements due to decreases in population as forecast in OCP which is used by OCTAM.

OCTAM also incorporates 2021 RHNA, local agency general plan updates, employment, and transportation system changes in Orange County and surrounding areas. As a regional modeling tool, OCTAM is not used to evaluate traffic volumes at an intersection level. The forecasted roadway link volumes generated by OCTAM are post-processed to derive intersection turning movement volumes used for the intersection level analysis.

Post-processing involves calculating intersection volumes using the “B-Turns” methodology which utilizes an iterative “Furness” growth factoring methodology to grow existing traffic counts based on the relative change in the intersection’s approach and departure volumes between the existing and future model scenarios. This approach is consistent with National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 255.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 13

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROJECT LIST
This section describes the development of the improvement project list that corresponds to the Traffic Impact Fee update and Improvements identified in the City’s LRSP and SAP. Intersection improvements are proposed to accommodate the future traffic demand resulting from buildout of the Adopted Housing Element and to maintain the City’s minimum LOS D. The City’s LRSP and SAP were also utilized to identify infrastructure improvement needed to accommodate the safety needs of future traffic demand. Table 6 summarizes the list of required improvements at the study intersections. Figure 3 shows the locations of the intersections which need improvement.

Table 6: Improvement Project List
Intersection Improvement
1 1st St/Marina Dr Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Modify existing curb return and curb ramp.
2 5th St/Marina Dr Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. 3 Seal Beach Blvd/
Bradbury Rd
Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install raised hardscape median with turnouts and upgraded driveways with proper radii (~500 LF). 4 Seal Beach Blvd/
Rossmoor Center Wy
Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install raised hardscape median with turnouts and upgraded driveways with proper radii (~500 LF). 5 Seal Beach Blvd/
Towne Center Dr
Modify Traffic Signal to provide protected left turn phasing in for westbound approach.

Add a westbound left turn lane. Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button.

Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install Leading pedestrian Interval System. Install EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System. 6 Seal Beach Blvd/
St Cloud Dr
Upgrade traffic signal phasing to remove split phasing. Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install Leading pedestrian Interval System. Install EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System.

Modify existing curb ramps on south side of intersection to be directional curb ramps. 7 Seal Beach Blvd/
Lampson Ave
Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install Leading pedestrian Interval System. Install bicycle video detection system, EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System.
8 Seal Beach Blvd/
Old Ranch Pkwy-405 NB
Ramps*
Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install Leading pedestrian Interval System. Install bicycle video detection system, EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System. Trim bushes for sight distance.
9 Seal Beach Blvd/
Gate Rd-405 SB Ramps*
Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install Leading pedestrian Interval System. Install bicycle video detection system, EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System. 10 Seal Beach Blvd/
Golden Rain Rd (WB)
Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Improve signal timing. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install Leading Pedestrian Interval System.

Install bicycle video detection system, EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System.
11 Seal Beach Blvd/
Golden Rain Rd (EB)
Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Improve signal timing. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install Leading Pedestrian Interval System.

Install bicycle video detection system, EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System.
12 Seal Beach Blvd/
St Andrews Dr
Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Improve signal timing. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System. Modify existing access curb ramp.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 14
Intersection Improvement
13 Seal Beach Blvd/
Westminster Ave
Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install Leading pedestrian Interval System. Install bicycle video detection system, EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System. Reconstruct both raised median on the South of Westminster on Seal Beach Blvd. Relocate existing OCTA bus stop at NEC on NB Seal Beach Blvd to 220' north of ECR. 14 Seal Beach Blvd/Road C
Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install bicycle video detection system, EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System.
15 Seal Beach Blvd/Apollo Dr
Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install bicycle video detection system, EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System.
16 Seal Beach Blvd/
Adolfo Lopez Dr
Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Improve signal timing. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install Leading Pedestrian Interval System.

Install bicycle video detection system, EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System. Modify existing access curb ramp.
17 Seal Beach Blvd/
Heron Point
Upgrade pole equipment. Improve signal timing. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install no right-turn-on-red-restriction from Bolsa Ave on WBR movement. 18 Seal Beach Blvd/Bolsa Ave
Signal modification to Install Eastbound and Westbound protected left-turn signal heads and implement protected left-turn phasing for the Eastbound and Westbound movements. Improve signal timing. Restripe EB approach to add a second Eastbound left-turn lane. This may require the conversion of the right-turn lane into a thru-right lane due to limited right-of-way. Restripe EB on the East of PCH. 19 Seal Beach Blvd/
Marlin Ave
Signal modification to install updated pole standards, safety lighting and equipment.

Install Curb Ramp.
20 Seal Beach Blvd/
Pacific Coast Hwy* Adjust signal timing to accommodate new traffic patterns Add a second eastbound left-turn lane by modifying existing raised median 21 Old Ranch Plaza/
Lampson Ave
Signal modification to install updated pole standards and equipment. 22 Basswood St/
Lampson Ave
Signal modification to install updated pole standards and equipment. 23 Candleberry Ave/
Lampson Ave
Signal modification to install updated pole standards and equipment. 24 Heather St/Lampson Ave Install no right-turn-on-red-restriction on NBR movement. Install protected phasing on N/S movements.
25 Rose St/Lampson Ave
Upgrade pole equipment and APS ped push button. Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install Leading pedestrian Interval System. Install bicycle video detection system, EVP, and Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection System. Replace existing advanced warning flashing beacons at ~2000' East of Kitts Hwy on WB Westminster Ave's North shoulder.
26 Tulip St/Lampson Ave Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Modify existing curb return and curb ramp.
27 Apollo Dr/
Westminster Ave Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. 28 Kitts Hwy/
Westminster Ave
Upgrade signing and striping at the intersection. Install raised hardscape median with turnouts and upgraded driveways with proper radii (~500 LF). * Intersection operated by Caltrans
Figure 3
Intersection Improvement Locations
405
N

NOT TO SCALE
Intersections recommended
City Boundary
for improvements
3 7
5 6
8 11
12 13
16 15
14 18
20 X
24 25 26
23 17
27 28
19 1 2
4 9
10 21 22
1 Leisure World
22 Old Ranch Golf
Center
Seal Beach Blvd
Pacific Coast
Bolsa Chica St
Studebaker Rd
Westminister Blvd
Seal Beach Blvd
Hwy
1st St
City of Seal Beach
Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study
Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 16

5.0 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
This section describes the methodology used to estimate the total cost of the intersection improvement projects described in Section 6. The cost of each intersection improvement project is generally based on unit cost estimates obtained from the City’s LRSP and SAP documents. Intersection improvement costs for the intersection of PCH and Seal Beach Boulevard are based on recent available Caltrans cost data for similar types of improvements. Note that a 30% contingency factor and 15% Engineering fee factor were added to the construction costs.

5.1 Intersection Improvement Cost Estimates
Table 7 summarizes the intersection improvement costs based on the methodology described. The fair share percentage of costs applied towards the fee is noted for all locations except the intersection of PCH and Seal Beach Boulevard. For this location, the full cost is applied because the LOS deteriorated from D in existing conditions to E using projected 2050 models. A detailed cost breakdown illustrating the details of the cost elements at each intersection is provided in Appendix D.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 17
Table 7: Improvement Project Costs
Intersection Sub‐total Fair Share %
towards fee
Total Intersection
Cost
(after Fair Share %)
1 1st St/Marina Dr $58,034 17% $9,866
2 5th St/Marina Dr $23,899 20% $4,780
3 Seal Beach Blvd/Bradbury Rd $209,866 5% $10,493
4 Seal Beach Blvd/Rossmoor Center Wy $209,866 12% $25,184 5 Seal Beach Blvd/Towne Center Dr $1,353,787 6% $81,227 6 Seal Beach Blvd/St Cloud Dr $408,079 5% $20,404
7 Seal Beach Blvd/Lampson Ave $245,988 5% $12,299
8 Seal Beach Blvd/Old Ranch Pkwy-405 NB Ramps** $198,892 3% $5,967 9 Seal Beach Blvd/Gate Rd-405 SB Ramps** $130,889 3% $3,272 10 Seal Beach Blvd/Golden Rain Rd (WB) $378,562 6% $22,714 11 Seal Beach Blvd/Golden Rain Rd (EB) $378,562 6% $22,714 12 Seal Beach Blvd/St Andrews Dr $175,962 5% $10,558
13 Seal Beach Blvd/Westminster Ave $1,485,876 6% $74,294 14 Seal Beach Blvd/Road C $184,434 6% $11,066
15 Seal Beach Blvd/Apollo Dr $184,434 7% $11,066
16 Seal Beach Blvd/Adolfo Lopez Dr $181,371 7% $12,696
18 Seal Beach Blvd/Bolsa Ave $429,065 11% $47,197
20 Seal Beach Blvd/Pacific Coast Hwy* $1,181,050 50% $590,525 21 Old Ranch Plaza/Lampson Ave $224,250 7% $15,698
22 Basswood St/Lampson Ave $224,250 6% $13,455
23 Candleberry Ave/Lampson Ave $224,250 6% $13,455
24 Heather St/Lampson Ave $224,250 6% $13,455
25 Rose St/Lampson Ave $224,250 6% $13,455
26 Tulip St/Lampson Ave $139,035 7% $9,732
28 Kitts Hwy/Westminster Ave $317,240 7% $22,207
TOTAL $1,074,788
Note: All other intersections “fair share” calculation is based on traffic increase caused by new development unless otherwise noted. * Intersection identified as having no existing deficiency, and the City is responsible for 50% of intersection costs. Thus, the cost applied to the fee (as shown) reflects 50% “fair share” percentage of the total improvement cost. ** The City is responsible for 50% of the intersection “fair share” costs.

As shown in Table 7, the total cost of required physical construction, at the 28 intersections requiring improvements, is estimated as $1,074,788. This cost includes a 30 percent contingency fee and a 15 percent engineering fee factor consistent with planning level cost estimates.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 18

5.2 Improvement Cost Summary
In addition to physical construction costs of intersection-level improvements, additional fees are included to cover other transportation-related improvements and internal costs over a 10-year period. These fees include:
 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Improvements – This fee would cover the installation of 6,000 feet of conduit and 96 strand fiber to connect three traffic signals. The fee includes a fair share estimate to replace aging fiber optic cable and related network equipment. A unit cost of $100.00 per foot of conduit and $10.00 per foot of fiber is assumed, resulting in a total of $660,000. The fee also includes related network hardware and software required to integrate each traffic signal into the City’s Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS), enabling more efficient use of existing capacity in compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 743.
 Traffic Signal Maintenance and Operation Fee – This fee would be used for routine and preventative maintenance repairs of the City’s traffic signal equipment and associated lighting, as well as signal timing adjustments where applicable. The annual cost of $11,900 per traffic signal was applied, consistent with such costs in other jurisdictions. For maintenance of 26 traffic signals, the total cost over the span of 10 years would be $3,094,000. The fair share annual cost applied to this category was 8% (which is the weighted average fair share percentage for all intersections combined), for a total of $247,520 to be paid for by the fee program.
 City Administration Fee – This fee covers annual tasks related to City Council action for Engineering News Record (ENR) construction cost increases, improvement project prioritization and budgeting, and public education. A yearly fee of $7,400 was calculated based on 40 hours of staff time at $200 per hour. Over the span of 10 years, the Administration Fee would total $80,000.  5-year Update Fee – This fee includes staff and consultant time to validate new construction, update land use data for zoning and General Plan changes, rerun the model, prepare reports, and prepare Council action if necessary. The 5-year Update would occur two times during the 10-year period. Each update would cost $30,000, totaling $60,000 over the life of the General Plan horizon.

Table 8 summarizes the final cost calculations.

Table 8: Total Transportation Improvement Costs
Category Cost
Intersection Improvements $1,074,788
ITS Improvements $660,000
Traffic Signal Maintenance and Operation Fee $247,520
City Administration Fee $80,000
5-year Updates (Administration fee) $60,000
NET TOTAL $2,122,308
Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 19

6.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
The Traffic Impact Fee was calculated by dividing the total costs of the improvements by the expected net daily trips forecast to be generated from new development within the City by buildout of the General Plan land uses (included recently adopted housing element). The final maximum traffic impact fee, assuming the net transportation improvement cost of $2,122,308 required by the addition of 7,065 new daily trips forecast under General Plan buildout conditions, is $300.39 per daily trip. This calculation assumes that all “trips” are expected to equally contribute to the need for the improvements, regardless of the land use types that generate the trips. The fees to be collected as a result of this updated traffic impact fee nexus study are supplementary to the specific fees and conditions imposed upon individual development projects by the City.

All requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act in California Government Code Section 66001 have been met by this nexus study.

6.1 Cost Increases Over Time
The cost estimates used to calculate the traffic impact fee were based on 2025 dollars and unit costs applied recently in other cities. In order for the traffic impact fee to stay current with changing construction and land costs, the City of Seal Beach shall apply an inflation adjustment to the fee. Construction costs shall be revised periodically to reflect changes in the Construction Cost Index published by the ENR.

6.2 Final Fee Schedule
In order to develop the final fee schedule, for scaling purposes, the new maximum traffic impact fee per daily trip was multiplied by daily trip rates for various land use types acquired from the ITE Trip Generation 11th Edition manual (the most recent version at the time of this report). For example, the maximum allowable fee for the single-family (detached) category was derived as follows:
 $300.39 per daily trip * 9.43 daily trips per single-family residential unit = $2,833 per unit Based on the cost per daily trip calculated as part of this study, the following maximum traffic impact fee schedule is recommended, generally consistent with the land use types included in the current fee structure:

1. Retail/Shopping Center: $16.36 per square foot of gross leasable area

2. General Office Building: $3.26 per square foot of gross leasable area

3. Restaurant: $25.18 per square foot of gross leasable area

4. Hotel: $2,400 per room

5. Single-family Residential: $1.61 per livable square foot (assuming $2,833 per unit) o The per unit fee, calculated using the ITE trip rate, is based on an average single-family unit size of 1,757 square feet. The average size is consistent with the average size identified in the City’s Parks Impact Fee Update, which is sourced from Redfin. The per square foot fee applied as part of the program, consistent with AB 602, is calculated by dividing $2,833 per unit by 1,757 square feet per unit.

Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee
Nexus Study Update
Iteris, Inc. | 20

6. Multi-family Residential: $1.58 per livable square foot (assuming $2,364 per unit) o The per unit fee, calculated using the ITE trip rate, is based on an average multi-family unit size of 861 square feet. The average size is consistent with the average size identified in the City’s Parks Impact Fee Update, which is sourced from Costar. The per square foot fee applied as part of this program, consistent with AB 602, is calculated by dividing $2,364 per unit by 861 square feet per unit.

7. Other Land Use Types: $300.39 per daily trip generated, utilizing trip rates from the latest version of the ITE Trip Generation manual

6.3 Comparison With Other Jurisdictions
Lastly, the traffic impact fees applied in similar jurisdictions within the area were reviewed in order to provide a comparison to the proposed City of Seal Beach maximum traffic impact fees developed as part of this report (as well as the current fees). Table 9 summarizes the fee comparison per unit, room, or square foot as applicable.

Table 9: Transportation Impact Fee Comparisons (to Seal Beach) Agency
Residential (per unit)
Hotel
(per room)
General
Office
(per sq ft) Apartment Condominium Single‐family
(detached)
Seal Beach (current) $959.95 $788.72 $1,462.81 $866.95 $4.15 Seal Beach (max allowable)* $1,364** Same as Apt $2,833** $2,400 $3.26 Huntington Beach $2,068 $1,804 $2,944 $2,034 $2.77
Long Beach $1,125 $1,125 $1,125 $750 $2.00
Placentia $1,004 Same as Apt $1,619 N/A $2.41
Anaheim $1,297 Same as Apt $2,029 $1,474 $3.67
Garden Grove $990 Same as Apt $1,600 $919 $2.61
* Maximum allowable fee per land use category as calculated by this report, using ITE Trip Generation daily trip rates. ** Assuming average square foot of residential unit 1,757 for Single Family and 861 for multi-family.

As shown in Table 9, the maximum allowable traffic impact fees are higher than the currently adopted Seal Beach fees, with the exception of the General Office category. Compared to fees in nearby jurisdictions, the maximum allowable fees are also generally higher. However, the maximum allowable fee for multi-family residential development (i.e., apartments/condominiums) and single-family residential development would still be lower than fees currently imposed by Huntington Beach for the same uses. Also, the General Office fee is lower in part due to declining ITE trip generation rates for that land use category.

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Apollo Dr & Westminster Blvd
City: Seal Beach Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 21 0 23 122 0 1 322
7:15 AM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 22 0 51 156 0 1 384
7:30 AM 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 11 0 32 259 0 2 492
7:45 AM 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 214 19 0 40 303 0 2 586
8:00 AM 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 189 14 0 48 245 0 0 501
8:15 AM 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 15 0 49 232 0 2 493
8:30 AM 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 8 0 24 235 0 2 421
8:45 AM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 8 0 32 286 0 2 487

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 18 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 1373 118 0 299 1838 0 12 3686 APPROACH %'s : 39.13% 0.00% 60.87% 0.00% 0.00% 92.09% 7.91% 0.00% 13.91% 85.53% 0.00% 0.56% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 11 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 771 59 0 169 1039 0 6 2072 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.917 0.000 0.708 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.901 0.776 0.000 0.862 0.857 0.000 0.750 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 40 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 196 1 0 12 245 0 0 522
4:15 PM 22 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 2 0 5 221 0 0 454
4:30 PM 36 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 206 4 0 8 275 0 0 554
4:45 PM 18 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 199 4 0 5 245 0 0 491
5:00 PM 66 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 1 0 8 247 0 0 562
5:15 PM 26 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 253 4 1 18 260 0 1 578
5:30 PM 30 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 199 0 0 25 198 0 0 471
5:45 PM 36 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 212 8 0 56 218 0 0 555

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 274 0 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 1656 24 1 137 1909 0 1 4187 APPROACH %'s : 59.69% 0.00% 40.31% 0.00% 0.00% 98.51% 1.43% 0.06% 6.69% 93.26% 0.00% 0.05% PEAK HR : 4:30 PM 291 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 146 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 859 13 1 39 1027 0 1 2185 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.553 0.000 0.635 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.849 0.813 0.250 0.542 0.934 0.000 0.250 Data - Totals
Apollo Dr Apollo Dr Westminster Blvd Westminster Blvd

0.875 0.891 0.880
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
25-010017-001
2/25/2025
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.945 0.583 0.846 0.943
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.884
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Apollo Dr & Westminster Blvd
City: Seal Beach Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 4
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 3 0 0 2 0 0 12
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 70.00% 30.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 5
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 6
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 12
APPROACH %'s : 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 4:30 PM 291 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 9
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.333 0.000 0.000 Data - Bikes
Apollo Dr Apollo Dr Westminster Blvd Westminster Blvd

0.250 0.250
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
25-010017-001
2/25/2025
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.375 0.250 0.750 0.333
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.313
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Apollo Dr & Westminster Blvd Project ID:

City: Seal Beach Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00%
PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 38 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HR FACTOR :

Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4
APPROACH %'s : 50.00% 50.00%
PEAK HR : 4:30 PM 288 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.250
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Apollo Dr Apollo Dr Westminster Blvd Westminster Blvd
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
25-010017-001
2/25/2025

0.500 0.500
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-010017-001 Day:

City: Seal Beach Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1027 0 1039
0 0 1 0 1 39 0 169
0 0 0 0 TEV 2072 0 2185 0 1 0 6
771 0 859 2 PHF 0.88 0.95
59 0 13 1
0 1 0 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 146 0 99 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 11 0 17 AM
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 0
Apollo Dr & Westminster Blvd
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Apollo Dr Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 2/25/2025 PEAK HOURS 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM COUNT PERIODS NONE 959 0 794
Totals (AM) 52 Total Bikes (AM) Westminster Blvd EASTBOUNDWESTBOUND Westminster Blvd 1050 0 1174

CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 228

NORTHBOUND
Apollo Dr
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM

NOON PMNOON AMAMNOON PM PMNOON AMAMNOON PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
10 000 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000 0
0 4
0 0
3 0
000
200
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 1
2 0
2 0
000
000
0 1027
13 39
859
0 000 146
099
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 1039
59 169
771
0 000 11
017
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: 5th St & Marina Dr
City: Seal Beach Project ID:

Control: 4-Way Stop Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 3 3 0 2 4 1 0 1 18 0 0 4 7 7 0 50
7:15 AM 0 7 5 0 3 4 0 0 5 17 0 0 2 14 11 0 68
7:30 AM 1 13 2 0 0 8 0 0 7 21 0 0 3 15 13 0 83
7:45 AM 0 9 1 0 4 7 4 0 3 19 2 0 2 18 8 0 77
8:00 AM 0 10 1 0 4 3 4 0 3 22 1 0 3 20 17 0 88
8:15 AM 1 2 6 0 4 7 4 0 3 16 2 0 2 31 9 0 87
8:30 AM 2 8 0 0 2 8 2 0 2 13 0 0 2 20 13 0 72
8:45 AM 0 7 1 0 3 7 7 0 3 19 0 0 2 28 7 0 84

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 4 59 19 0 22 48 22 0 27 145 5 0 20 153 85 0 609 APPROACH %'s : 4.88% 71.95% 23.17% 0.00% 23.91% 52.17% 23.91% 0.00% 15.25% 81.92% 2.82% 0.00% 7.75% 59.30% 32.95% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 2 34 10 0 12 25 12 0 16 78 5 0 10 84 47 0 335 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.654 0.417 0.000 0.750 0.781 0.750 0.000 0.571 0.886 0.625 0.000 0.833 0.677 0.691 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 1 9 9 1 10 7 5 0 4 23 1 1 6 35 21 0 133
4:15 PM 1 11 3 0 9 10 5 1 4 29 2 0 5 38 14 0 132
4:30 PM 1 13 5 0 9 6 6 0 6 27 2 0 8 26 13 0 122
4:45 PM 2 13 3 0 3 11 7 0 7 41 3 0 6 45 13 0 154
5:00 PM 1 17 1 0 7 9 10 0 7 23 3 0 10 45 19 0 152
5:15 PM 0 15 5 0 5 5 12 0 5 26 4 0 3 42 14 0 136
5:30 PM 2 18 2 0 2 9 3 0 6 21 2 0 15 30 15 0 125
5:45 PM 3 10 7 0 5 16 14 0 8 29 1 1 6 35 12 0 147

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 11 106 35 1 50 73 62 1 47 219 18 2 59 296 121 0 1101 APPROACH %'s : 7.19% 69.28% 22.88% 0.65% 26.88% 39.25% 33.33% 0.54% 16.43% 76.57% 6.29% 0.70% 12.39% 62.18% 25.42% 0.00% PEAK HR : 4:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 5 63 11 0 17 34 32 0 25 111 12 0 34 162 61 0 567 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.625 0.875 0.550 0.000 0.607 0.773 0.667 0.000 0.893 0.677 0.750 0.000 0.567 0.900 0.803 0.000 Data - Totals
5th St 5th St Marina Dr Marina Dr

0.719 0.817 0.884 0.839
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
25-010017-004
2/25/2025
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM

0.920 0.898 0.798 0.725 0.868
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.952
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: 5th St & Marina Dr
City: Seal Beach Project ID:

Control: 4-Way Stop Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
8:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 1 0 11
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 33.33% 66.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 5
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 5
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5
5:45 PM 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 9

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 1 1 0 0 7 4 3 0 2 4 0 0 0 9 5 0 36
APPROACH %'s : 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 28.57% 21.43% 0.00% 33.33% 66.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 64.29% 35.71% 0.00% PEAK HR : 4:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 7 2 0 18
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.500 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.583 0.500 0.000 Data - Bikes
5th St 5th St Marina Dr Marina Dr

0.250 0.250 0.250
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
25-010017-004
2/25/2025
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM

0.900 0.750 0.375 0.563
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.375
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: 5th St & Marina Dr Project ID:

City: Seal Beach Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 1 1 0 3 0 0 2 0 7
7:15 AM 0 1 3 2 0 1 0 2 9
7:30 AM 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 3 10
7:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1 7
8:00 AM 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 1 10
8:15 AM 0 0 2 5 1 0 0 1 9
8:30 AM 0 1 2 4 0 2 2 4 15
8:45 AM 1 1 0 5 2 1 1 0 11

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 2 4 13 27 3 7 10 12 78
APPROACH %'s : 33.33% 66.67% 32.50% 67.50% 30.00% 70.00% 45.45% 54.55% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 38 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 8 13 1 3 5 6 36
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.667 0.650 0.250 0.250 0.417 0.500
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 1 0 5 4 1 2 1 2 16
4:15 PM 2 0 4 7 0 5 4 5 27
4:30 PM 4 2 3 2 0 0 1 2 14
4:45 PM 0 2 6 4 0 1 2 1 16
5:00 PM 2 0 1 4 0 2 4 3 16
5:15 PM 2 1 2 3 4 1 0 2 15
5:30 PM 1 1 7 6 0 3 0 2 20
5:45 PM 3 0 2 4 1 1 3 0 14

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 15 6 30 34 6 15 15 17 138
APPROACH %'s : 71.43% 28.57% 46.88% 53.13% 28.57% 71.43% 46.88% 53.13% PEAK HR : 4:45 PM 289 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 5 4 16 17 4 7 6 8 67
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.625 0.500 0.571 0.708 0.250 0.583 0.375 0.667 Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
5th St 5th St Marina Dr Marina Dr

0.750 0.333 0.688
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
25-010017-004
2/25/2025

0.838 0.750 0.635 0.550 0.500
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM

0.900
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-010017-004 Day:

City: Seal Beach Date:

AM 12 25 12 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 32 34 17 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1 1 0 0 1 61 0 47
1 162 0 84
0 0 0 0 0 34 0 10
16 0 25 0 TEV 335 0 567 0 0 0 0
78 0 111 1 PHF 0.95 0.92
5 0 12 1
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 5 63 11 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 2 34 10 AM
0 NONE
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM 149
5th St & Marina Dr
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
5th St Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 2/25/2025 PEAK HOURS 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 97 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM COUNT PERIODS NONE 139 0 100
Totals (AM) 80 Total Bikes (AM) Marina Dr EASTBOUNDWESTBOUND Marina Dr 98 0 199

CONTROL
4-Way Stop
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 40

NORTHBOUND
5th St
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM

NOON PMNOON AMAMNOON PM PMNOON AMAMNOON PM
8 0
6 6
0 5 160 8130 17
4 0
1 7
0 3
50 000 4
2 7
0 0
1 2
042
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
1 0
0 0
1 0
100
000
61 162
12 34
111
25 323417
56311
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
47 84
5 10
78 16 122512
23410
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: 1st St & Marina Dr
City: Seal Beach Project ID:

Control: 4-Way Stop Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 7 12 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 10 7 0 0 6 15 0 66
7:15 AM 7 7 4 0 5 6 0 0 2 10 7 0 1 10 8 0 67
7:30 AM 9 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 14 7 0 0 18 10 0 67
7:45 AM 10 12 2 0 7 4 1 0 2 24 8 0 4 19 12 0 105
8:00 AM 10 4 1 0 2 6 2 0 0 24 8 0 4 12 13 0 86
8:15 AM 7 9 2 0 9 6 2 0 1 22 5 0 5 19 7 0 94
8:30 AM 11 5 1 0 6 3 2 0 2 15 2 0 0 19 15 1 82
8:45 AM 8 7 1 0 11 3 1 0 0 20 7 0 2 19 5 0 84

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 69 59 16 0 40 31 8 0 14 139 51 0 16 122 85 1 651 APPROACH %'s : 47.92% 40.97% 11.11% 0.00% 50.63% 39.24% 10.13% 0.00% 6.86% 68.14% 25.00% 0.00% 7.14% 54.46% 37.95% 0.45% PEAK HR : 7:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 38 30 6 0 24 19 7 0 5 85 23 0 13 69 47 1 367 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.864 0.625 0.750 0.000 0.667 0.792 0.875 0.000 0.625 0.885 0.719 0.000 0.650 0.908 0.783 0.250 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 19 11 1 0 5 5 5 0 3 34 25 0 3 34 10 0 155
4:15 PM 8 5 5 0 7 6 3 0 5 24 18 0 7 30 12 0 130
4:30 PM 9 12 1 0 11 12 6 0 4 35 18 0 1 30 13 0 152
4:45 PM 15 11 4 0 5 6 3 0 4 41 16 0 6 42 24 0 177
5:00 PM 18 8 2 0 8 2 6 0 6 32 16 0 8 49 8 0 163
5:15 PM 23 9 2 0 5 4 5 0 1 29 20 0 6 42 12 1 159
5:30 PM 6 8 4 0 7 9 5 0 5 25 19 0 5 20 16 1 130
5:45 PM 13 11 4 0 9 9 1 0 5 31 19 0 10 27 8 0 147

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 111 75 23 0 57 53 34 0 33 251 151 0 46 274 103 2 1213 APPROACH %'s : 53.11% 35.89% 11.00% 0.00% 39.58% 36.81% 23.61% 0.00% 7.59% 57.70% 34.71% 0.00% 10.82% 64.47% 24.24% 0.47% PEAK HR : 4:30 PM 291 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 65 40 9 0 29 24 20 0 15 137 70 0 21 163 57 1 651 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.707 0.833 0.563 0.000 0.659 0.500 0.833 0.000 0.625 0.835 0.875 0.000 0.656 0.832 0.594 0.250 25-010017-003
2/25/2025
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.919 0.838 0.629 0.910 0.840
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM

0.874
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.771 0.735 0.831 0.929
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Totals
1st St 1st St Marina Dr Marina Dr
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: 1st St & Marina Dr
City: Seal Beach Project ID:

Control: 4-Way Stop Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 4
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
7:45 AM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
8:00 AM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 5
8:45 AM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 8

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 12 0 0 7 0 0 36
APPROACH %'s : 90.00% 0.00% 10.00% 0.00% 5.26% 31.58% 63.16% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 0 0 3 0 0 18
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.375 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.313 0.000 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 8
4:30 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
4:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 4
5:00 PM 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 7
5:15 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 7
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
5:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 10 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 12 3 0 0 7 2 0 42
APPROACH %'s : 90.91% 9.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 25.00% 60.00% 15.00% 0.00% 0.00% 77.78% 22.22% 0.00% PEAK HR : 4:30 PM 291 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 5 1 0 0 5 1 0 23
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.750 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.375 0.625 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.625 0.250 0.000 25-010017-003
2/25/2025
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.821 0.583 0.250 0.750 0.750
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM

0.900
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.438 0.500 0.375
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Bikes
1st St 1st St Marina Dr Marina Dr
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: 1st St & Marina Dr Project ID:

City: Seal Beach Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 1 3 1 2 2 0 0 0 9
7:15 AM 1 3 1 1 1 1 0 4 12
7:30 AM 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 5
7:45 AM 3 0 1 2 1 0 4 2 13
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
8:15 AM 1 3 1 6 0 1 2 2 16
8:30 AM 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 6
8:45 AM 3 3 0 4 0 2 1 2 15

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 9 13 7 17 4 6 10 11 77
APPROACH %'s : 40.91% 59.09% 29.17% 70.83% 40.00% 60.00% 47.62% 52.38% PEAK HR : 7:45 AM 39 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 4 4 4 9 1 2 8 4 36
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.333 0.333 0.500 0.375 0.250 0.500 0.500 0.500 Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 4 6 2 2 2 0 3 1 20
4:15 PM 1 0 3 0 0 2 1 1 8
4:30 PM 2 0 0 4 0 2 3 0 11
4:45 PM 0 4 4 6 1 2 1 2 20
5:00 PM 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 8
5:15 PM 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 0 7
5:30 PM 1 0 3 3 0 2 1 1 11
5:45 PM 1 2 1 0 0 3 2 4 13

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 10 16 17 16 4 11 13 11 98
APPROACH %'s : 38.46% 61.54% 51.52% 48.48% 26.67% 73.33% 54.17% 45.83% PEAK HR : 4:30 PM 288 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 3 8 8 11 2 4 6 4 46
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.375 0.500 0.500 0.458 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 25-010017-003
2/25/2025

0.575 0.550 0.475 0.500 0.833
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.563 0.500

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

0.464 0.750 0.500
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
1st St 1st St Marina Dr Marina Dr
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-010017-003 Day:

City: Seal Beach Date:

AM 7 19 24 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 20 24 29 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1 1 1 0 0 57 0 47
1 163 0 69
0 0 0 0 1 21 0 13
5 0 15 1 TEV 367 0 651 0 1 0 1
85 0 137 1 PHF 0.87 0.92
23 0 70 0
0 1 0.5 0.5

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 65 40 9 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 38 30 6 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 55

NORTHBOUND
1st St
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)
NONE
176 0 116
Totals (AM) 115 Total Bikes (AM) Marina Dr EASTBOUNDWESTBOUND Marina Dr 114 0 248

CONTROL
4-Way Stop
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 112
1st St & Marina Dr
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
1st St Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 2/25/2025 PEAK HOURS 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM 82 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM

NOON PMNOON AMAMNOON PM PMNOON AMAMNOON PM
4 0
4 6
0 8
80 490 11
2 0
1 4
0 2
30 440 8
1 5
1 0
5 3
100
610
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 3
5 0
2 1
000
601
57 163
70 21
137
15 202429 6540
9 0
0 0 0
0 0
000
000
47 69
23 13
85 5
71924 3830
6 National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Seal Beach Blvd & Marlin Ave
City: Seal Beach Project ID:

Control: 1-Way Stop(EB) Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 152 0 0 0 96 3 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 262
7:15 AM 1 143 0 0 0 172 9 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 330
7:30 AM 15 163 0 0 0 139 22 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 349
7:45 AM 4 174 0 1 0 220 19 0 12 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 438
8:00 AM 1 162 0 0 0 198 6 0 12 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 390
8:15 AM 3 163 0 1 0 180 5 0 8 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 365
8:30 AM 0 146 0 1 0 189 7 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 348
8:45 AM 2 138 0 0 0 167 10 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 321

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 26 1241 0 3 0 1361 81 0 54 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 2803 APPROACH %'s : 2.05% 97.72% 0.00% 0.24% 0.00% 94.38% 5.62% 0.00% 59.34% 0.00% 40.66% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 23 662 0 2 0 737 52 0 39 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 1542 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.383 0.951 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.838 0.591 0.000 0.813 0.000 0.614 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 5 155 0 1 0 208 13 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 390
4:15 PM 0 169 0 1 0 166 8 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 349
4:30 PM 3 148 0 2 0 212 9 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 381
4:45 PM 5 145 0 0 0 199 8 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 361
5:00 PM 4 163 0 0 0 203 7 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 380
5:15 PM 5 154 0 0 0 182 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 351
5:30 PM 3 175 0 0 0 185 10 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 380
5:45 PM 3 146 0 2 0 200 13 0 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 376

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 28 1255 0 6 0 1555 75 0 26 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 2968 APPROACH %'s : 2.17% 97.36% 0.00% 0.47% 0.00% 95.40% 4.60% 0.00% 53.06% 0.00% 46.94% 0.00% PEAK HR : 5:00 PM 293 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 15 638 0 2 0 770 37 0 13 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1487 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.750 0.911 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.948 0.712 0.000 0.650 0.000 0.429 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 25-010017-002
2/25/2025
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM

0.978 0.920 0.947 0.521
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.880
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.959 0.825 0.717
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Totals
Seal Beach Blvd Seal Beach Blvd Marlin Ave Marlin Ave
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Seal Beach Blvd & Marlin Ave
City: Seal Beach Project ID:

Control: 1-Way Stop(EB) Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
5:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 5:00 PM 293 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 25-010017-002
2/25/2025
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM

0.625 1.000 0.250
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.500
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.250 0.375 0.250
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Bikes
Seal Beach Blvd Seal Beach Blvd Marlin Ave Marlin Ave
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Seal Beach Blvd & Marlin Ave Project ID:

City: Seal Beach Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 2 48
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 39 85
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 48 143
APPROACH %'s : 66.43% 33.57%
PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 38 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 43 135
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.276
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 12
APPROACH %'s : 58.33% 41.67%
PEAK HR : 5:00 PM 290 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 10
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.750 0.333
25-010017-002
2/25/2025

0.625 0.625
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM

0.397

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

0.397
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Seal Beach Blvd Seal Beach Blvd Marlin Ave Marlin Ave
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-010017-002 Day:

City: Seal Beach Date:

AM 52 737 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 37 770 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
39 0 13 0 TEV 1542 0 1487 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 PHF 0.88 0.98
27 0 12 0
0 1 3 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 2 15 638 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 2 23 662 0 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 766

NORTHBOUND
Seal Beach Blvd
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)
NONE
0 0 0
Totals (AM) 784 Total Bikes (AM) Marlin Ave EASTBOUNDWESTBOUND Marlin Ave 75 0 52

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(EB)
0 NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 651
Seal Beach Blvd & Marlin Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Seal Beach Blvd Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 2/25/2025 PEAK HOURS 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 701 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM

NOON PMNOON AMAMNOON PM PMNOON AMAMNOON PM
4 0
43 6
0 92
00 000 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
010
040
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
1 0
0 0
060
010
0 0
12 0
0 13 37770
0 15638
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
27 0
0 39 52737
0 23662
0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings
1: 1st St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 85 23 14 69 47 38 30 6 24 19 7
Future Volume (vph) 5 85 23 14 69 47 38 30 6 24 19 7
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 65 0 70 0 50 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 70 50 50
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.968 0.939 0.975 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1803 0 1770 1749 0 1770 1816 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1803 0 1770 1749 0 1770 1816 0 1770 1863 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 40
Link Distance (ft) 745 1359 938 991
Travel Time (s) 16.9 30.9 21.3 16.9
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 85 23 14 69 47 38 30 6 24 19 7
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 108 0 14 116 0 38 36 0 24 19 7
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 6th AWSC
1: 1st St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.5
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 85 23 14 69 47 38 30 6 24 19 7
Future Vol, veh/h 5 85 23 14 69 47 38 30 6 24 19 7
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 5 85 23 14 69 47 38 30 6 24 19 7
Number of Lanes 110110110111
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2232
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3222
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2322
HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.5 8.6 8.4

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 83% 0% 79% 0% 59% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 17% 0% 21% 0% 41% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 38 36 5 108 14 116 24 19 7
LT Vol 38 0 5 0 14 0 24 0 0
Through Vol 0 30 0 85 0 69 0 19 0
RT Vol 0 6 0 23 0 47 0 0 7
Lane Flow Rate 38 36 5 108 14 116 24 19 7
Geometry Grp 888888888
Degree of Util (X) 0.061 0.052 0.008 0.15 0.022 0.156 0.039 0.028 0.009 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.82 5.2 5.658 5.007 5.63 4.845 5.866 5.363 4.66 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 616 688 633 717 637 741 610 667 766
Service Time 3.555 2.935 3.386 2.735 3.357 2.571 3.604 3.101 2.398 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 0.052 0.008 0.151 0.022 0.157 0.039 0.028 0.009 HCM Control Delay 8.9 8.2 8.4 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.8 8.3 7.4
HCM Lane LOS AAAAAAAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.2 0 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
2: 5th St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 16 78 5 10 84 47 2 34 10 12 25 12
Future Volume (vph) 16 78 5 10 84 47 2 34 10 12 25 12
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.993 0.955 0.971 0.850
Flt Protected 0.992 0.996 0.998 0.984
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1835 0 0 1772 0 0 1805 0 0 1833 1583 Flt Permitted 0.992 0.996 0.998 0.984
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1835 0 0 1772 0 0 1805 0 0 1833 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1359 918 1174 1074
Travel Time (s) 30.9 20.9 26.7 24.4
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 16 78 5 10 84 47 2 34 10 12 25 12
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 99 0 0 141 0 0 46 0 0 37 12
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 6th AWSC
2: 5th St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 78 5 10 84 47 2 34 10 12 25 12
Future Vol, veh/h 16 78 5 10 84 47 2 34 10 12 25 12
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 16 78 5 10 84 47 2 34 10 12 25 12
Number of Lanes 010010010011
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1121
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1211
HCM Control Delay 7.9 7.9 7.8 8

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 4% 16% 7% 32% 0%
Vol Thru, % 74% 79% 60% 68% 0%
Vol Right, % 22% 5% 33% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 46 99 141 37 12
LT Vol 2 16 10 12 0
Through Vol 34 78 84 25 0
RT Vol 10 5 47 0 12
Lane Flow Rate 46 99 141 37 12
Geometry Grp 52277
Degree of Util (X) 0.058 0.118 0.16 0.054 0.015
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.5 4.309 4.095 5.262 4.395
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 799 835 881 683 817
Service Time 2.513 2.321 2.095 2.975 2.108
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 0.119 0.16 0.054 0.015
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.9 7.9 8.3 7.2
HCM Lane LOS AAAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 160 9 69 45 9 10 72 951 19 1 14 859 Future Volume (vph) 160 9 69 45 9 10 72 951 19 1 14 859 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 15 15 12 12 11 10 12 12 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 92 0 0 60 358 0 205
Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 60 25 75 75
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.868 0.850 0.997 0.984
Flt Protected 0.950 0.960 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1947 1751 0 0 1729 1478 1770 5067 0 0 1770 4988 Flt Permitted 0.719 0.736 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1468 1751 0 0 1320 1455 1770 5067 0 0 1770 4988 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 75 101 3 21
Link Speed (mph) 25 25 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 498 562 1142 537
Travel Time (s) 13.6 15.3 19.5 9.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 4 4 3 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 174 10 75 49 10 11 78 1034 21 1 15 934
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 174 85 0 0 59 11 78 1055 0 0 16 1044 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right R NA Left Left Median Width(ft) 15 18 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 9 15
Number of Detectors 1 1 11111 111
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 00000 000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 00000 000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA
Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 5 2
Permitted Phases 8 4 4
Detector Phase 8 8 44416 552
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 6
Lane Group SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 101
Future Volume (vph) 101
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12
Storage Length (ft) 0
Storage Lanes 0
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor 0.91
Ped Bike Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0
Right Turn on Red Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 110
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No
Lane Alignment Right
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9
Number of Detectors
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft)
Trailing Detector (ft)
Detector 1 Position(ft)
Detector 1 Size(ft)
Detector 1 Type
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s)
Detector 1 Queue (s)
Detector 1 Delay (s)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 7
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 3.0 12.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 15.0 26.3 15.0 15.0 26.3 Total Split (s) 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 21.0 57.0 17.0 17.0 53.0 Total Split (%) 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% 17.5% 47.5% 14.2% 14.2% 44.2% Maximum Green (s) 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 17.5 51.7 13.5 13.5 47.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.3 3.0 3.0 4.3 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -1.3 0.0 -1.3
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 5.0 1.5 1.5 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 1.5 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max None None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 14.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 19.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 15.0 88.3 5.2 75.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.74 0.04 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.24 0.27 0.03 0.35 0.28 0.21 0.33
Control Delay 63.6 12.7 44.8 0.2 45.5 7.3 61.3 12.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 63.6 12.7 44.8 0.2 45.5 7.3 61.3 12.3

LOS E B D A D A E B
Approach Delay 46.9 37.8 9.9 13.0
Approach LOS D D A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 73 (61%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT and 6:NBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72
Intersection Signal Delay: 15.8 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 8
Lane Group SBR
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Maximum Green (s)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s)
Minimum Gap (s)
Time Before Reduce (s)
Time To Reduce (s)
Recall Mode
Walk Time (s)
Flash Dont Walk (s)
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr)
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 9
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 44 3 57 8 3 24 38 1043 5 9 14 879
Future Volume (vph) 44 3 57 8 3 24 38 1043 5 9 14 879
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 8 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 80 0 0 0 80 60 150
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 100 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.95
Frt 0.857 0.866 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1570 0 1770 1595 0 1770 5085 1372 0 1770 5085 Flt Permitted 0.738 0.701 0.950 0.533
Satd. Flow (perm) 1375 1570 0 1300 1595 0 1770 5085 1308 0 993 5085 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 62 26 52
Link Speed (mph) 25 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 538 406 892 1142
Travel Time (s) 14.7 9.2 15.2 19.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 48 3 62 9 3 26 41 1134 5 10 15 955
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 65 0 9 29 0 41 1134 5 0 25 955 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right R NA Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 16 16
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 9 15
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 111111
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Perm custom Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 1
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 522116
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 10
Lane Group SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 51
Future Volume (vph) 51
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Lane Width (ft) 8
Storage Length (ft) 150
Storage Lanes 1
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.96
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 1372
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 1314
Right Turn on Red Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 61
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 55
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 55
Enter Blocked Intersection No
Lane Alignment Right
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.20
Turning Speed (mph) 9
Number of Detectors 1
Detector Template Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0
Turn Type Perm
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase 6
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 11
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 36.2 36.2 15.0 15.0 15.0 17.5 17.5 15.0 15.0 18.5 Total Split (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 69.0 69.0 15.0 15.0 68.0 Total Split (%) 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 13.3% 57.5% 57.5% 12.5% 12.5% 56.7% Maximum Green (s) 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 11.5 63.5 63.5 10.5 10.5 62.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.5 -1.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max C-Max None None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 25.0 25.0 5.0 5.0 6.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 10.6 95.3 95.3 9.7 92.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.79 0.79 0.08 0.77 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.35 0.08 0.19 0.26 0.28 0.00 0.32 0.24
Control Delay 63.0 18.7 50.5 22.3 38.9 0.8 0.0 78.1 2.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 63.0 18.7 50.5 22.3 38.9 0.8 0.0 78.1 2.3

LOS E B D C D A A E A
Approach Delay 37.5 28.9 2.1 4.0
Approach LOS D C A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 83 (69%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.43
Intersection Signal Delay: 5.1 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 12
Lane Group SBR
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0
Minimum Split (s) 18.5
Total Split (s) 68.0
Total Split (%) 56.7%
Maximum Green (s) 62.5
Yellow Time (s) 4.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.5
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0
Recall Mode C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 6.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 92.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77
v/c Ratio 0.05
Control Delay 0.2
Queue Delay 0.0
Total Delay 0.2
LOS A
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
5: Seal Beach Blvd & Towne Center Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 13
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 1 18 44 2 15 30 1012 38 13 812 15 Future Volume (vph) 5 1 18 44 2 15 30 1012 38 13 812 15 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 75 0 179 0 170 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 110 130
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.857 0.867 0.995 0.997
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1596 0 1770 1584 0 1770 5055 0 1770 5067 0 Flt Permitted 0.746 0.744 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1377 1596 0 1386 1584 0 1770 5055 0 1770 5067 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 20 16 7 3
Link Speed (mph) 15 15 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 340 303 598 892
Travel Time (s) 15.5 13.8 10.2 15.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 2 12
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 1 20 48 2 16 33 1100 41 14 883 16
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 21 0 48 18 0 33 1141 0 14 899 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
5: Seal Beach Blvd & Towne Center Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 14
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 10.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 34.0 34.0 15.0 22.5 15.0 22.5 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 17.0 65.0 20.0 68.0 Total Split (%) 29.2% 29.2% 29.2% 29.2% 14.2% 54.2% 16.7% 56.7% Maximum Green (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 12.5 59.5 15.5 62.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 23.0 23.0 10.0 10.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 7.3 100.7 6.1 97.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.84 0.05 0.81 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.14 0.44 0.13 0.31 0.27 0.16 0.22
Control Delay 49.6 22.2 63.8 24.8 66.7 0.7 62.0 2.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 49.6 22.2 63.8 24.8 66.7 0.7 62.0 2.0

LOS D C E C E A E A
Approach Delay 27.5 53.2 2.6 2.9
Approach LOS C D A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 87 (73%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.44
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.5 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 5: Seal Beach Blvd & Towne Center Dr Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 15
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 108 0 665 55 8 0 377 1328 62 1 1141 44 Future Volume (vph) 108 0 665 55 8 0 377 1328 62 1 1141 44 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 107 0 0 0 206 0 78 0
Storage Lanes 1 2 1 0 2 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 40 25 120 110
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.993 0.994
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.963 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 2787 1681 1704 0 3433 5044 0 1770 5051 0 Flt Permitted 0.731 0.950 0.963 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1354 0 2787 1681 1704 0 3433 5044 0 1770 5051 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 305 8 5
Link Speed (mph) 25 15 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 526 300 909 598
Travel Time (s) 14.3 13.6 15.5 10.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 1 1 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 52
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 117 0 723 60 9 0 410 1443 67 1 1240 48
Shared Lane Traffic (%) 49%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 0 723 31 38 0 410 1510 0 1 1288 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm pm+ov Split NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 5 3 3 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4
Detector Phase 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 16
Lane Group Ø8
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor
Ped Bike Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Adj. Flow (vph)
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Enter Blocked Intersection
Lane Alignment
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor
Turning Speed (mph)
Number of Detectors
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft)
Trailing Detector (ft)
Detector 1 Position(ft)
Detector 1 Size(ft)
Detector 1 Type
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s)
Detector 1 Queue (s)
Detector 1 Delay (s)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 8
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 17
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 22.5 15.0 28.5 Total Split (s) 27.0 24.0 20.0 20.0 24.0 58.0 15.0 49.0 Total Split (%) 22.5% 20.0% 16.7% 16.7% 20.0% 48.3% 12.5% 40.8% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 19.5 16.0 16.0 19.5 52.5 10.5 43.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 10.0 16.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 20.4 42.7 9.1 9.1 18.3 78.7 5.1 58.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.36 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.66 0.04 0.49 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.61 0.24 0.29 0.78 0.46 0.01 0.52
Control Delay 52.1 19.1 55.9 57.5 66.1 5.6 73.0 19.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 52.1 19.1 55.9 57.5 66.1 5.6 73.0 19.6

LOS D B E E E A E B
Approach Delay 23.7 56.8 18.5 19.6
Approach LOS C E B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 69 (58%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78
Intersection Signal Delay: 20.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 18
Lane Group Ø8
Minimum Initial (s) 2.0
Minimum Split (s) 35.0
Total Split (s) 47.0
Total Split (%) 39%
Maximum Green (s) 44.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 0.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0
Recall Mode None
Walk Time (s) 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 25.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Seal Beach Blvd & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 19
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 340 572 1199 266 364 1244
Future Volume (vph) 340 572 1199 266 364 1244
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 147 299 319
Storage Lanes 2 1 1 2
Taper Length (ft) 25 150
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91
Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 5085 1583 3433 5085
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1558 5085 1555 3433 5085
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 9 45
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 40
Link Distance (ft) 707 802 909
Travel Time (s) 10.7 12.2 15.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 370 622 1303 289 396 1352
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 370 622 1303 289 396 1352
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left
Median Width(ft) 36 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15
Number of Detectors 111111
Detector Template Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 20 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 100 20 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot pm+ov NA pm+ov Prot NA
Protected Phases 812816
Permitted Phases 8 2
Detector Phase 882216
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Seal Beach Blvd & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 20
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 38.3 15.0 35.5 38.3 15.0 15.0
Total Split (s) 47.0 24.0 49.0 47.0 24.0 73.0
Total Split (%) 39.2% 20.0% 40.8% 39.2% 20.0% 60.8%
Maximum Green (s) 42.0 19.5 43.5 42.0 19.5 67.5
Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.5 4.0 3.5 4.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.3 -0.5 -1.5 -1.3 -0.5 -1.5
Total Lost Time (s) 3.7 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 5.0 3.0 2.0 5.0
Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 26.0 23.0 26.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 35.5 55.2 52.8 88.6 20.0 76.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.46 0.44 0.74 0.17 0.64
v/c Ratio 0.36 0.86 0.58 0.25 0.69 0.42
Control Delay 31.2 36.4 28.0 2.4 46.7 7.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 31.2 36.4 28.0 2.4 46.7 7.5

LOS C D C A D A
Approach Delay 34.5 23.4 16.4
Approach LOS C C B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 66 (55%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86
Intersection Signal Delay: 23.1 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 7: Seal Beach Blvd & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
8: Seal Beach Blvd & Old Ranch Pkwy 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 21
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 4 3 6 343 26 427 69 794 413 239 890 226 Future Volume (vph) 4 3 6 343 26 427 69 794 413 239 890 226 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 117 0 217 124 0 260 392
Storage Lanes 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 60 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.868 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 3433 1536 1504 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1863 1583 3433 1536 1504 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 145 200 264 449 246
Link Speed (mph) 30 35 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 663 410 1873 802
Travel Time (s) 15.1 8.0 28.4 12.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 3 7 373 28 464 75 863 449 260 967 246 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 43%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 3 7 373 228 264 75 863 449 260 967 246 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 111111111111
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 000000000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 7 8 2 2 6
Detector Phase 777888522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 44.2 44.2 44.2 12.2 15.3 15.3 12.2 35.3 35.3 Total Split (s) 14.0 14.0 14.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 13.0 33.0 33.0 28.0 48.0 48.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings
8: Seal Beach Blvd & Old Ranch Pkwy 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 22
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Split (%) 11.7% 11.7% 11.7% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% 10.8% 27.5% 27.5% 23.3% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 9.8 9.8 9.8 40.8 40.8 40.8 8.8 27.7 27.7 23.8 42.7 42.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 4.3 4.3 3.2 4.3 4.3 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -1.1 -1.1 -1.1 -0.2 -1.8 -1.8 -0.2 -1.8 -1.8 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.1 3.1 3.1 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 25.0 25.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.7 8.7 8.7 19.9 19.9 19.9 8.8 70.9 70.9 13.7 78.2 78.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.59 0.59 0.11 0.65 0.65 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.65 0.54 0.56 0.30 0.29 0.40 0.66 0.29 0.22 Control Delay 52.5 52.3 0.2 52.0 13.4 9.8 34.4 5.4 2.2 45.6 11.1 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 52.5 52.3 0.2 52.0 13.4 9.8 34.4 5.4 2.2 45.6 11.1 5.0

LOS D D A D B A C A A D B A
Approach Delay 26.3 28.9 5.9 16.2
Approach LOS C C A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 9 (8%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 105
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66
Intersection Signal Delay: 15.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 8: Seal Beach Blvd & Old Ranch Pkwy
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
9: Seal Beach Blvd & N Gate Rd 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 23
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 3 2 600 15 351 7 923 238 319 887 26 Future Volume (vph) 5 3 2 600 15 351 7 923 238 319 887 26 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 100 0 100 86 225 650 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 83 120
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frt 0.970 0.850 0.850 0.996
Flt Protected 0.976 0.950 0.955 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3351 0 1681 1690 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 5065 0 Flt Permitted 0.976 0.950 0.955 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3351 0 1681 1690 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 5065 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2 191 259 5
Link Speed (mph) 35 40 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 991 994 1529 1873
Travel Time (s) 19.3 16.9 20.9 25.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 3 2 652 16 382 8 1003 259 347 964 28
Shared Lane Traffic (%) 44%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 10 0 365 303 382 8 1003 259 347 992 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 11111111
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 00000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 00000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Split NA Split NA Free Prot NA Perm Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 2
Detector Phase 4 4 3 3 52216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 15.7 15.7 12.2 23.7 Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 27.0 27.0 13.0 37.0 37.0 39.0 63.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings
9: Seal Beach Blvd & N Gate Rd 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 24
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Split (%) 14.2% 14.2% 22.5% 22.5% 10.8% 30.8% 30.8% 32.5% 52.5% Maximum Green (s) 12.8 12.8 22.8 22.8 8.8 31.3 31.3 34.8 57.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 4.7 4.7 3.2 4.7
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.1 -1.4 -1.4 -0.2 -2.2 -2.2 -0.2 -2.2 Total Lost Time (s) 3.1 2.8 2.8 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5
Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 20.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 13.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.1 24.2 24.2 120.0 8.2 48.1 48.1 35.0 84.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.20 0.20 1.00 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.29 0.70 v/c Ratio 0.04 1.08 0.89 0.24 0.07 0.49 0.33 0.67 0.28
Control Delay 46.0 116.4 75.0 0.4 53.7 28.6 4.5 51.0 6.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.0 116.4 75.0 0.4 53.7 28.6 4.5 51.0 6.3

LOS D F E A D C A D A
Approach Delay 46.0 62.2 23.8 17.9
Approach LOS D E C B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 119 (99%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.08
Intersection Signal Delay: 32.7 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 9: Seal Beach Blvd & N Gate Rd
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 25
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Ø2 Ø4
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 31 1173 1549 171
Future Volume (vph) 0 0 31 1173 1549 171
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 115
Storage Lanes 0 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.98
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 5085 5085 1583
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 5085 5085 1555
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 149
Link Speed (mph) 15 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 370 174 1529
Travel Time (s) 16.8 2.4 20.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 34 1275 1684 186
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 34 1275 1684 186
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 0 16 16
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1111
Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 100 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 4 6 2 4
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase 5 2 4 6 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 26
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Ø2 Ø4
Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 26.7 26.7 15.7 15.0
Total Split (s) 18.0 30.0 30.0 48.0 17.0
Total Split (%) 27.7% 46.2% 46.2% 74% 26%
Maximum Green (s) 13.5 24.3 24.3 42.3 13.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.5 -1.7 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.7
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max None
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 14.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.3 65.0 39.7 38.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 1.00 0.61 0.58
v/c Ratio 0.20 0.25 0.54 0.19
Control Delay 30.4 0.6 9.4 3.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 30.4 0.6 9.4 3.4

LOS C A A A
Approach Delay 1.4 8.8
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 65
Actuated Cycle Length: 65
Offset: 60 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.54
Intersection Signal Delay: 5.8 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd Lanes, Volumes, Timings
11: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 27
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Ø5
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 150 45 0 1055 1548 0
Future Volume (vph) 150 45 0 1055 1548 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 13 16 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 91 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.91 1.00
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3547 1794 0 6408 5085 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3547 1794 0 6408 5085 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 49
Link Speed (mph) 15 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 316 1806 174
Travel Time (s) 14.4 24.6 2.4
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 163 49 0 1147 1683 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 163 49 0 1147 1683 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 26 4 4
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.96 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Right Thru Thru
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 100 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA
Protected Phases 4 2 6 5
Permitted Phases 4
Detector Phase 4 4 2 6
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
11: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 28
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Ø5
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 3.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.7 26.7 15.0
Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 48.0 30.0 18.0
Total Split (%) 26.2% 26.2% 73.8% 46.2% 28%
Maximum Green (s) 13.0 13.0 42.3 24.3 13.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 4.7 4.7 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 -1.7 -1.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
Recall Mode None None C-Max C-Max None
Walk Time (s) 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 12.7 12.7 44.3 39.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.68 0.61
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.13 0.26 0.54
Control Delay 22.9 8.3 6.6 1.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 22.9 8.3 6.6 1.5

LOS C A A A
Approach Delay 19.6 6.6 1.5
Approach LOS B A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 65
Actuated Cycle Length: 65
Offset: 60 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.54
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.7 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 11: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Andrews Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 29
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 39 56 38 886 1265 50
Future Volume (vph) 39 56 38 886 1265 50
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 110 0 175 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 70 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91
Ped Bike Factor 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.994
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 5085 5050 0
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 5085 5050 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 61 12
Link Speed (mph) 15 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 538 1002 1806
Travel Time (s) 24.5 13.7 24.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 42 61 41 963 1375 54
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 42 61 41 963 1429 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 11111
Detector Template Left Right Left Thru Thru
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 20 100 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 00000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 20 100 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4
Detector Phase 44526
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Andrews Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 30
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 2.0 15.0 15.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 20.7 21.7
Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 15.0 48.0 33.0
Total Split (%) 26.2% 26.2% 23.1% 73.8% 50.8%
Maximum Green (s) 13.0 13.0 10.5 42.3 27.3
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.7 4.7
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.7 -1.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 9.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.1 6.1 6.6 53.4 48.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.82 0.75
v/c Ratio 0.25 0.30 0.23 0.23 0.38
Control Delay 30.5 12.4 34.6 1.5 0.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 30.5 12.4 34.6 1.5 0.4

LOS C B C A A
Approach Delay 19.8 2.8 0.4
Approach LOS B A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 65
Actuated Cycle Length: 65
Offset: 27 (42%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.38
Intersection Signal Delay: 2.2 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 12: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Andrews Dr Lanes, Volumes, Timings
13: Seal Beach Blvd /Seal Beach Blvd & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025 Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 31
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 181 434 28 190 492 118 43 759 105 206 971 411 Future Volume (vph) 181 434 28 190 492 118 43 759 105 206 971 411 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 0 280 0 265 0 284 187
Storage Lanes 2 0 2 0 1 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 125 95 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98
Frt 0.991 0.971 0.982 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5040 0 3433 3437 0 1770 4985 0 3433 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5040 0 3433 3437 0 1770 4985 0 3433 5085 1558 Right Turn on Red No Yes Yes No
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 18
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 50
Link Distance (ft) 1322 799 861 1002
Travel Time (s) 20.0 12.1 23.5 13.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 193 462 30 202 523 126 46 807 112 219 1033 437 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 193 492 0 202 649 0 46 919 0 219 1033 437 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
13: Seal Beach Blvd /Seal Beach Blvd & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025 Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 32
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 39.2 8.0 36.0 8.0 31.2 7.7 35.7 35.7 Total Split (s) 17.0 49.0 24.0 56.0 18.0 32.0 25.0 39.0 39.0 Total Split (%) 13.1% 37.7% 18.5% 43.1% 13.8% 24.6% 19.2% 30.0% 30.0% Maximum Green (s) 12.0 43.0 19.0 50.0 13.0 26.3 20.3 33.3 33.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 4.7 3.0 4.7 4.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.7 -2.8 -1.7 -2.8 -1.7 -3.2 -1.7 -3.2 -3.2 Total Lost Time (s) 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.3 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0
Time Before Reduce (s) 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max C-Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 25.0 20.0 23.0 23.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 00
Act Effct Green (s) 13.3 33.7 13.7 34.1 13.0 56.2 14.4 59.2 59.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.26 0.11 0.26 0.10 0.43 0.11 0.46 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.38 0.56 0.70 0.26 0.42 0.58 0.45 0.62
Control Delay 61.7 40.0 59.4 44.1 54.4 25.5 53.4 31.8 40.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 61.7 40.0 59.4 44.1 54.4 25.5 53.4 31.8 40.5

LOS E D E D D C D C D
Approach Delay 46.1 47.7 26.9 36.9
Approach LOS DDCD
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 95
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.70
Intersection Signal Delay: 38.3 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 13: Seal Beach Blvd /Seal Beach Blvd & Westminster Ave Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Seal Beach Blvd & Road C 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 33
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 10 0 63 0 0 0 74 780 0 2 0 791
Future Volume (vph) 10 0 63 0 0 0 74 780 0 2 0 791
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 12 15 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 0 192 0 196
Storage Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 60 80
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 0 1742 0 0 0 1770 5085 0 1770 0 5085 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 0 1742 0 0 0 1770 5085 0 1770 0 5085 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 217
Link Speed (mph) 15 15 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 316 163 1791 695
Travel Time (s) 14.4 7.4 24.4 9.5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 0 68 0 0 0 80 848 0 2 0 860
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 0 68 0 0 0 80 848 0 2 0 860
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right R NA Left Left Median Width(ft) 11 11 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 9 15
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Right Left Thru Left Thru
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4
Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Seal Beach Blvd & Road C 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 34
Lane Group SBR Ø8
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 41
Future Volume (vph) 41
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12
Storage Length (ft) 99
Storage Lanes 1
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 1583
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 1544
Right Turn on Red Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 92
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 45
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 45
Enter Blocked Intersection No
Lane Alignment Right
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9
Number of Detectors 1
Detector Template Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0
Turn Type Perm
Protected Phases 8
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Seal Beach Blvd & Road C 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 35
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 10.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.7 15.0 22.7
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 15.0 28.0 15.0 28.0
Total Split (%) 33.8% 33.8% 23.1% 43.1% 23.1% 43.1%
Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 10.5 22.3 10.5 22.3
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.7 3.5 4.7
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.7 -0.5 -1.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0
Recall Mode None None None C-Max None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 12.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.0 6.0 7.9 53.4 6.2 45.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.82 0.10 0.70
v/c Ratio 0.07 0.19 0.37 0.20 0.01 0.24
Control Delay 27.6 1.2 43.5 1.2 19.5 3.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 27.6 1.2 43.5 1.2 19.5 3.4

LOS C A D A B A
Approach Delay 4.9 4.8 3.3
Approach LOS A A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 65
Actuated Cycle Length: 65
Offset: 57 (88%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.37
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.1 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 14: Seal Beach Blvd & Road C
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Seal Beach Blvd & Road C 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 36
Lane Group SBR Ø8
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.7 39.0
Total Split (s) 28.0 22.0
Total Split (%) 43.1% 34%
Maximum Green (s) 22.3 18.0
Yellow Time (s) 4.7 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 2.0
Recall Mode C-Max None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 12.0 30.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 45.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70
v/c Ratio 0.04
Control Delay 1.5
Queue Delay 0.0
Total Delay 1.5
LOS A
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Seal Beach Blvd & Apollo Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 37
Lane Group NBL NBT SBT SBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 857 834 29 29 3
Future Volume (vph) 5 857 834 29 29 3
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 11 16
Storage Length (ft) 180 162 0 92
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 60 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 5085 1583 1711 1794
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 5085 1539 1711 1794
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 32 3
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 25
Link Distance (ft) 577 1791 717
Travel Time (s) 7.9 24.4 19.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 5 932 907 32 32 3
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 932 907 32 32 3
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 16 12 21
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 0.85
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 122111
Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Seal Beach Blvd & Apollo Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 38
Lane Group NBL NBT SBT SBR SEL SER
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 6 4
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 526644
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 17.7 26.7 26.7 15.0 15.0
Total Split (s) 15.0 48.0 33.0 33.0 17.0 17.0
Total Split (%) 23.1% 73.8% 50.8% 50.8% 26.2% 26.2%
Maximum Green (s) 10.5 42.3 27.3 27.3 13.0 13.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.5 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max None None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 16.0 16.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.5 58.6 56.1 56.1 6.8 6.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.90 0.86 0.86 0.10 0.10
v/c Ratio 0.02 0.20 0.21 0.02 0.18 0.02
Control Delay 44.4 0.1 2.1 1.7 28.4 18.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 44.4 0.1 2.1 1.7 28.4 18.3

LOS D A A A C B
Approach Delay 0.4 2.1 27.5
Approach LOS A A C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 65
Actuated Cycle Length: 65
Offset: 50 (77%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.21
Intersection Signal Delay: 1.7 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 15: Seal Beach Blvd & Apollo Dr
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
16: Seal Beach Blvd & Adolfo Lopez Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 39
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 11 16 12 851 802 34
Future Volume (vph) 11 16 12 851 802 34
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 13 16 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 240 191 90
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1829 1794 1770 5085 5085 1583
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1829 1794 1770 5085 5085 1540
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 37
Link Speed (mph) 25 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 715 1223 577
Travel Time (s) 19.5 16.7 7.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 12 17 13 925 872 37
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 17 13 925 872 37
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 13 16 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.96 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 111221
Detector Template Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 20 100 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 20 6 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
16: Seal Beach Blvd & Adolfo Lopez Dr 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 40
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 6
Detector Phase 445266
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 17.7 26.7 26.7
Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 15.0 48.0 33.0 33.0
Total Split (%) 26.2% 26.2% 23.1% 73.8% 50.8% 50.8%
Maximum Green (s) 13.0 13.0 10.5 42.3 27.3 27.3
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.7 4.7 4.7
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 16.0 16.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.0 7.0 8.5 58.7 56.2 56.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.90 0.86 0.86
v/c Ratio 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.03
Control Delay 26.4 13.9 27.8 0.3 0.2 0.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 26.4 13.9 27.8 0.3 0.2 0.0

LOS C B C A A A
Approach Delay 19.1 0.7 0.2
Approach LOS B A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 65
Actuated Cycle Length: 65
Offset: 50 (77%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.20
Intersection Signal Delay: 0.7 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 16: Seal Beach Blvd & Adolfo Lopez Dr Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Seal Beach Blvd & Heron Pointe/Forrestal Ln 05/29/2025 Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 41
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 34 0 8 4 0 11 6 817 28 1 40 748
Future Volume (vph) 34 0 8 4 0 11 6 817 28 1 40 748
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 90 0 120 289 0 192
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 60 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.995 0.996
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1770 1583 0 1770 1583 1770 5058 0 0 1770 5063 Flt Permitted 0.800 0.800 0.950 0.548
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1490 1583 0 1490 1583 1770 5058 0 0 1021 5063 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 222 222 9 7
Link Speed (mph) 15 15 40 50
Link Distance (ft) 253 838 2064 1223
Travel Time (s) 11.5 38.1 35.2 16.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 37 0 9 4 0 12 7 888 30 1 43 813
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 37 9 0 4 12 7 918 0 0 44 836
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right R NA Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 0 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 9 15
Number of Detectors 11111112 112
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 00000000 000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000000 000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 6 20 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Seal Beach Blvd & Heron Pointe/Forrestal Ln 05/29/2025 Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 42
Lane Group SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 21
Future Volume (vph) 21
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0
Storage Lanes 0
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor 0.91
Ped Bike Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0
Right Turn on Red Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 23
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No
Lane Alignment Right
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9
Number of Detectors
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft)
Trailing Detector (ft)
Detector 1 Position(ft)
Detector 1 Size(ft)
Detector 1 Type
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s)
Detector 1 Queue (s)
Detector 1 Delay (s)
Detector 2 Position(ft)
Detector 2 Size(ft)
Detector 2 Type
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s)
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Seal Beach Blvd & Heron Pointe/Forrestal Ln 05/29/2025 Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 43
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA custom Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 1
Detector Phase 44488852 116
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 15.0 25.0 15.0 15.0 24.7 Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 16.0 28.0 15.0 15.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 33.8% 33.8% 33.8% 33.8% 33.8% 33.8% 24.6% 43.1% 23.1% 23.1% 41.5% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 11.5 22.0 10.5 10.5 21.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 3.5 3.5 4.7 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -2.0 -0.5 -1.7 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Max None None C-Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.2 6.6 45.7 9.4 52.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.70 0.14 0.80 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.26 0.30 0.21
Control Delay 28.7 0.1 24.8 0.2 23.0 5.3 29.4 1.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 28.7 0.1 24.8 0.2 23.0 5.3 29.4 1.1

LOS C A C A C A C A
Approach Delay 23.1 6.3 5.5 2.5
Approach LOS C A A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 65
Actuated Cycle Length: 65
Offset: 64 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.30
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.5 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 17: Seal Beach Blvd & Heron Pointe/Forrestal Ln Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Seal Beach Blvd & Heron Pointe/Forrestal Ln 05/29/2025 Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 44
Lane Group SBR
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Maximum Green (s)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s)
Recall Mode
Walk Time (s)
Flash Dont Walk (s)
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr)
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
18: Seal Beach Blvd & Bolsa Ave/Anchor Way 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 45
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 195 2 65 13 6 49 13 613 3 20 578 155 Future Volume (vph) 195 2 65 13 6 49 13 613 3 20 578 155 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 40 167 0 189 0 198 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 95 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.94 1.00 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.867 0.999 0.968
Flt Protected 0.953 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1775 1583 1770 1615 0 1770 5080 0 1770 4892 0 Flt Permitted 0.953 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1775 1489 1770 1615 0 1770 5080 0 1770 4892 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 147 53 50
Link Speed (mph) 30 15 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1498 1062 1153 2064
Travel Time (s) 34.0 48.3 15.7 28.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 49 4 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 212 2 71 14 7 53 14 666 3 22 628 168
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 214 71 14 60 0 14 669 0 22 796 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 12 15 16
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 11111 12 12
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 00000 00 00
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000 00 00
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
18: Seal Beach Blvd & Bolsa Ave/Anchor Way 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 46
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Split NA Perm Split NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4
Detector Phase 44433 52 16
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 18.0 3.0 18.0 Minimum Split (s) 44.6 44.6 44.6 15.0 15.0 15.0 31.0 15.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 21.0 21.0 15.0 37.0 16.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 43.1% 43.1% 43.1% 16.2% 16.2% 11.5% 28.5% 12.3% 29.2% Maximum Green (s) 51.4 51.4 51.4 17.0 17.0 10.5 31.0 11.5 32.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -2.0 -0.5 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 18.0 13.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 23.0 23.0 8.1 8.1 6.1 79.4 9.3 84.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.61 0.07 0.65 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.18 0.13 0.40 0.17 0.22 0.17 0.25
Control Delay 60.6 1.1 59.0 25.6 64.8 9.1 51.1 9.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 60.6 1.1 59.0 25.6 64.8 9.1 51.1 9.1

LOS E A E C E A D A
Approach Delay 45.8 31.9 10.2 10.2
Approach LOS D C B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 78 (60%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68
Intersection Signal Delay: 16.5 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 18: Seal Beach Blvd & Bolsa Ave/Anchor Way Lanes, Volumes, Timings
19: Seal Beach Blvd & Marlin Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 47
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 39 27 25 662 737 52
Future Volume (vph) 39 27 25 662 737 52
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 85
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91
Frt 0.945 0.990
Flt Protected 0.971 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1709 0 1770 5085 5034 0
Flt Permitted 0.971 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1709 0 1770 5085 5034 0
Link Speed (mph) 25 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 591 614 1153
Travel Time (s) 16.1 8.4 15.7
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph) 39 27 25 662 737 52
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 66 0 25 662 789 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 6th TWSC
19: Seal Beach Blvd & Marlin Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 48
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 39 27 25 662 737 52
Future Vol, veh/h 39 27 25 662 737 52
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 100 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 39 27 25 662 737 52
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1078 395 789 0 - 0
Stage 1 763 -----
Stage 2 315 -----
Critical Hdwy 5.74 7.14 5.34 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.82 3.92 3.12 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 284 516 494 - - -
Stage 1 337 -----
Stage 2 654 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 270 516 494 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 270 -----
Stage 1 320 -----
Stage 2 654 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 18.4 0.5 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 494 - 335 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - 0.197 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 - 18.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 0.7 - -
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
20: Seal Beach Blvd & Pacific Coast Hwy 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 49
Lane Group EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 133 639 20 33 612 363 6 148 59 386 106 Future Volume (vph) 5 133 639 20 33 612 363 6 148 59 386 106 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 170 78 159 496 97 99 200
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 60 90 60 60
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.957
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3387 0 3433 1863 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3387 0 3433 1863 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 128 320 39
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1196 1066 687 614
Travel Time (s) 20.4 18.2 9.4 8.4
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 145 695 22 36 665 395 7 161 64 420 115 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 150 695 22 36 665 395 7 225 0 420 115 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment R NA Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 18 18 24 29
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 15
Number of Detectors 111111112 12
Detector Template Left Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 000000000 00
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000000 00
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 66
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 52344 33
Permitted Phases 6 2
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
20: Seal Beach Blvd & Pacific Coast Hwy 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 50
Lane Group SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 187
Future Volume (vph) 187
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0
Storage Lanes 1
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor 1.00
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 1583
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 203
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 203
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 203
Enter Blocked Intersection No
Lane Alignment Right
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9
Number of Detectors 1
Detector Template Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft)
Detector 2 Size(ft)
Detector 2 Type
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s)
Turn Type Perm
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases 3
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
20: Seal Beach Blvd & Pacific Coast Hwy 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 51
Lane Group EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Detector Phase 116652344 33
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.6 10.6 44.0 44.0 10.6 44.0 43.3 11.3 11.3 43.3 43.3 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 39.0 39.0 26.0 39.0 37.0 28.0 28.0 37.0 37.0 Total Split (%) 20.0% 20.0% 30.0% 30.0% 20.0% 30.0% 28.5% 21.5% 21.5% 28.5% 28.5% Maximum Green (s) 20.4 20.4 32.0 32.0 20.4 32.0 30.7 21.7 21.7 30.7 30.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.6 3.6 5.0 5.0 3.6 5.0 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.6 7.0 7.0 5.6 7.0 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 8.0 8.0 3.0 8.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recall Mode None None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 22.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 15.9 65.9 65.9 8.1 53.4 83.8 12.1 12.1 23.4 23.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.51 0.51 0.06 0.41 0.64 0.09 0.09 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.39 0.03 0.33 0.46 0.35 0.04 0.64 0.68 0.34 Control Delay 71.1 23.3 0.1 65.5 31.4 3.4 52.2 55.3 44.4 36.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 71.1 23.3 0.1 65.5 31.4 3.4 52.2 55.3 44.4 36.4

LOS E C A E C A D E D D
Approach Delay 31.0 22.4 55.2 34.0
Approach LOS C C E C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 77 (59%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69
Intersection Signal Delay: 30.5 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 20: Seal Beach Blvd & Pacific Coast Hwy Lanes, Volumes, Timings
20: Seal Beach Blvd & Pacific Coast Hwy 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 52
Lane Group SBR
Detector Phase 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 7.0
Minimum Split (s) 43.3
Total Split (s) 37.0
Total Split (%) 28.5%
Maximum Green (s) 30.7
Yellow Time (s) 4.3
All-Red Time (s) 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.3
Lead/Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5
Recall Mode None
Walk Time (s) 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 23.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18
v/c Ratio 0.45
Control Delay 11.3
Queue Delay 0.0
Total Delay 11.3
LOS B
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
21: Old Ranch Plaza & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 53
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 7 591 32 10 880 3 29 37103
Future Volume (vph) 7 591 32 10 880 3 29 37103
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 110 150 105 0 0 35 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 80 75 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.999 0.850 0.899
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.957 0.988
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3536 0 0 1783 1583 0 1655 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.743 0.924
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3536 0 0 1384 1583 0 1547 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 82 94 94
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 707 2617 340 327
Travel Time (s) 10.7 39.7 9.3 8.9
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 591 32 10 880 3 29 37103
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 591 32 10 883 0 0 32 7040
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 12112 12112
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 00000 00000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000 00000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6666
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA
Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8
Permitted Phases 6 4 4 8
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
21: Old Ranch Plaza & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 54
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 16652 44488
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.3 22.3 8.0 20.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 24.0 64.0 64.0 31.0 71.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 20.0% 53.3% 53.3% 25.8% 59.2% 20.8% 20.8% 20.8% 20.8% 20.8% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 58.7 58.7 27.0 65.7 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.3 4.3 3.0 4.3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 12.0 12.0 6.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 00000
Act Effct Green (s) 6.1 106.4 106.4 6.3 106.5 8.1 8.1 7.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.89 0.89 0.05 0.89 0.07 0.07 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.19 0.02 0.11 0.28 0.34 0.04 0.02
Control Delay 79.4 2.0 0.4 56.2 2.5 62.6 0.3 0.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 79.4 2.0 0.4 56.2 2.5 62.6 0.3 0.2

LOS E A A E A E A A
Approach Delay 2.7 3.1 51.4 0.3
Approach LOS A A D A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.34
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.1 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 21: Old Ranch Plaza & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
22: Basswood St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 55
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 18 420 79 9 730 6 204 13107
Future Volume (vph) 18 420 79 9 730 6 204 13107
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 115 0 175 0 85 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 100 75 60 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.976 0.999 0.887 0.882
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.994
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3454 0 1770 3536 0 1770 1652 0 0 1633 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.752 0.983
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3454 0 1770 3536 0 1401 1652 0 0 1615 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 28 1 3 125
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 2617 1278 620 461
Travel Time (s) 39.7 19.4 16.9 12.6
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 18 420 79 9 730 6 204 13107
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 499 0 9 736 0 204 40080
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6666
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4
Permitted Phases 8 4
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
22: Basswood St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 56
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.0 20.0 9.0 21.3 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 30.0 20.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 33.3% 22.2% 50.0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 24.7 16.0 39.7 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.3 3.0 4.3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 5.3 4.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Min None Min None None None None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 7.0 11.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 5.6 21.2 5.4 21.1 12.9 12.9 12.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.47 0.12 0.47 0.29 0.29 0.29
v/c Ratio 0.08 0.31 0.04 0.45 0.51 0.01 0.01
Control Delay 22.9 9.0 23.1 10.7 19.2 10.8 0.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 22.9 9.0 23.1 10.7 19.2 10.8 0.0

LOS C A C B B B A
Approach Delay 9.5 10.8 19.0
Approach LOS A B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 45.2
Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.51
Intersection Signal Delay: 11.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 22: Basswood St & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
23: Candlebury Ave & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 57
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 347 77 16 574 171 29
Future Volume (vph) 347 77 16 574 171 29
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 160 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 75 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.973 0.980
Flt Protected 0.950 0.959
Satd. Flow (prot) 3444 0 1770 3539 1751 0
Flt Permitted 0.505 0.959
Satd. Flow (perm) 3444 0 941 3539 1751 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 53 18
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25
Link Distance (ft) 1278 2619 927
Travel Time (s) 19.4 39.7 25.3
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph) 347 77 16 574 171 29
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 424 0 16 574 200 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 7 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1
Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left
Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot
Protected Phases 2 2 4
Permitted Phases 2
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
23: Candlebury Ave & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 58
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR
Detector Phase 2 2 2 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 24.0
Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Maximum Green (s) 24.5 24.5 24.5 26.0
Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max Max Max None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 15.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 30.9 30.9 30.9 10.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.21
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.03 0.25 0.51
Control Delay 4.6 5.5 5.4 19.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.6 5.5 5.4 19.1

LOS A A A B
Approach Delay 4.6 5.4 19.1
Approach LOS A A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 47.2
Natural Cycle: 45
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.51
Intersection Signal Delay: 7.4 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 23: Candlebury Ave & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
24: Heather St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 59
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 314 62 30 507 83 55
Future Volume (vph) 314 62 30 507 83 55
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 150 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 80 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.975 0.946
Flt Protected 0.950 0.971
Satd. Flow (prot) 3451 0 1770 3539 1711 0
Flt Permitted 0.529 0.971
Satd. Flow (perm) 3451 0 985 3539 1711 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 46 55
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25
Link Distance (ft) 2619 1584 691
Travel Time (s) 39.7 24.0 18.8
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph) 314 62 30 507 83 55
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 376 0 30 507 138 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1
Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left
Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot
Protected Phases 2 2 4
Permitted Phases 2
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
24: Heather St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 60
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Detector Phase 2 2 2 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 25.0
Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Maximum Green (s) 24.5 24.5 24.5 25.0
Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max Max Max None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 33.7 33.7 33.7 8.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.16
v/c Ratio 0.16 0.04 0.21 0.42
Control Delay 3.9 4.7 4.5 15.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.9 4.7 4.5 15.5

LOS A A A B
Approach Delay 3.9 4.5 15.5
Approach LOS A A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 48.8
Natural Cycle: 45
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.42
Intersection Signal Delay: 5.7 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 24: Heather St & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
25: Rose St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 61
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 336 24 25 505 37 46
Future Volume (vph) 336 24 25 505 37 46
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 65 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.990 0.925
Flt Protected 0.950 0.978
Satd. Flow (prot) 3504 0 1770 3539 1685 0
Flt Permitted 0.537 0.978
Satd. Flow (perm) 3504 0 1000 3539 1685 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 46
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25
Link Distance (ft) 1584 1257 867
Travel Time (s) 24.0 19.0 23.6
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph) 336 24 25 505 37 46
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 360 0 25 505 83 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1
Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left
Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot
Protected Phases 2 2 4
Permitted Phases 2
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
25: Rose St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 62
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Detector Phase 2 2 2 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0
Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 28.0
Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Maximum Green (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 25.0
Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max Max Max None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 18.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 38.7 38.7 38.7 7.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.13 0.03 0.18 0.28
Control Delay 3.1 4.0 3.3 13.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.1 4.0 3.3 13.4

LOS A A A B
Approach Delay 3.1 3.4 13.4
Approach LOS A A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 49.5
Natural Cycle: 50
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.28
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.1 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 25: Rose St & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
26: Tulip St/Parkewood & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 63
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 366 11 32 477 7 39 1 73 10 1 14
Future Volume (vph) 5 366 11 32 477 7 39 1 73 10 1 14
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 80 0 65 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 85 80 35 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.996 0.998 0.852 0.924
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.980
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 0 1770 3532 0 1770 1587 0 0 1687 0 Flt Permitted 0.476 0.528 0.870 0.837
Satd. Flow (perm) 887 3525 0 984 3532 0 1621 1587 0 0 1441 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 6 3 73 14
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 1257 1023 510 526
Travel Time (s) 19.0 15.5 13.9 14.3
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 366 11 32 477 7 39 1 73 10 1 14
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 377 0 32 484 0 39 74 0 0 25 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6666
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 2244
Permitted Phases 2244
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
26: Tulip St/Parkewood & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 64
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Maximum Green (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max Max Max Max None None None None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 33.5 33.5 33.5 33.5 7.4 7.4 7.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.17 0.17 0.17
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.14 0.04 0.18 0.15 0.23 0.10
Control Delay 4.2 3.6 4.4 3.7 16.8 7.1 11.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.2 3.6 4.4 3.7 16.8 7.1 11.7

LOS A A A A B A B
Approach Delay 3.6 3.8 10.5 11.7
Approach LOS AABB
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 44.7
Natural Cycle: 50
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.23
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.6 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 26: Tulip St/Parkewood & Lampson Ave Lanes, Volumes, Timings
27: Apollo Dr & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 65
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 771 59 175 1039 11 17
Future Volume (vph) 771 59 175 1039 11 17
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 207 220 0 90
Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 1770 3539 1770 1583
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1529 1770 3539 1770 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 64 18
Link Speed (mph) 50 45 25
Link Distance (ft) 1365 937 502
Travel Time (s) 18.6 14.2 13.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 838 64 190 1129 12 18
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 838 64 190 1129 12 18
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 111111
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 1 6 8
Permitted Phases 2 8
Detector Phase 221688
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
27: Apollo Dr & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 66
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 4.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 7.7 16.2 8.6 8.6
Total Split (s) 25.0 25.0 15.0 40.0 20.0 20.0
Total Split (%) 41.7% 41.7% 25.0% 66.7% 33.3% 33.3%
Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 11.0 35.0 16.0 16.0
Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -3.2 -3.2 -1.7 -2.8 -1.6 -1.6
Total Lost Time (s) 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 13.0 13.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 39.3 39.3 12.7 55.3 6.6 6.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.21 0.92 0.11 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.36 0.06 0.51 0.35 0.06 0.09
Control Delay 6.0 2.2 24.0 1.0 24.3 13.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.0 2.2 24.0 1.0 24.3 13.2

LOS A A C A C B
Approach Delay 5.8 4.3 17.6
Approach LOS A A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 60
Offset: 33 (55%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 40
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.51
Intersection Signal Delay: 5.1 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 27: Apollo Dr & Westminster Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
28: Kitts Hwy-Alfa Rd & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 67
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 6 829 46 63 1068 4462146
Future Volume (vph) 6 829 46 63 1068 4462146
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 260 0 715 0 75 55 0 75
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.999 0.850 0.905
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3535 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 1686 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.889 0.889
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1543 1770 3535 0 1656 1863 1583 1656 1686 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 71 7
Link Speed (mph) 45 60 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 799 6309 1679 2824
Travel Time (s) 12.1 71.7 45.8 77.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 921 51 70 1187 4472147
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 921 51 70 1191 0 4 7 2 1 11 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 11111 11111
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 00000 00000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000 00000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 8
Permitted Phases 2 4 4 8
Detector Phase 52216 44488
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
28: Kitts Hwy-Alfa Rd & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025
Existing AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 68
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 31.5 31.5 7.0 27.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 28.0 72.0 72.0 28.0 72.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 21.5% 55.4% 55.4% 21.5% 55.4% 23.1% 23.1% 23.1% 23.1% 23.1% Maximum Green (s) 24.0 64.5 64.5 24.0 64.5 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.7 -3.8 -3.8 -1.7 -4.9 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 Total Lost Time (s) 2.3 3.7 3.7 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 19.0 19.0 15.0 27.0 27.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.9 111.0 111.0 11.2 122.5 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.85 0.85 0.09 0.94 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.30 0.04 0.46 0.36 0.04 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.10 Control Delay 47.2 5.5 3.0 65.3 1.4 58.0 58.3 0.0 57.0 39.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 47.2 5.5 3.0 65.3 1.4 58.0 58.3 0.0 57.0 39.2

LOS D A A E A E E A E D
Approach Delay 5.7 5.0 49.3 40.7
Approach LOS A A D D
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 90 (69%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.46
Intersection Signal Delay: 5.7 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 28: Kitts Hwy-Alfa Rd & Westminster Ave Lanes, Volumes, Timings
1: 1st St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 15 137 70 22 163 57 65 40 9 29 24 20 Future Volume (vph) 15 137 70 22 163 57 65 40 9 29 24 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 65 0 70 0 50 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 70 50 50
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.949 0.961 0.972 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1768 0 1770 1790 0 1770 1811 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1768 0 1770 1790 0 1770 1811 0 1770 1863 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 40
Link Distance (ft) 745 1359 938 991
Travel Time (s) 16.9 30.9 21.3 16.9
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 15 137 70 22 163 57 65 40 9 29 24 20
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 15 207 0 22 220 0 65 49 0 29 24 20 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 6th AWSC
1: 1st St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.4
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 137 70 22 163 57 65 40 9 29 24 20 Future Vol, veh/h 15 137 70 22 163 57 65 40 9 29 24 20
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 15 137 70 22 163 57 65 40 9 29 24 20
Number of Lanes 110110110111
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2232
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3222
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2322
HCM Control Delay 10.6 10.8 9.9 9.3

HCM LOS BBAA

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 82% 0% 66% 0% 74% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 18% 0% 34% 0% 26% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 65 49 15 207 22 220 29 24 20
LT Vol 65 0 15 0 22 0 29 0 0
Through Vol 0 40 0 137 0 163 0 24 0
RT Vol 0 9 0 70 0 57 0 0 20
Lane Flow Rate 65 49 15 207 22 220 29 24 20
Geometry Grp 888888888
Degree of Util (X) 0.12 0.082 0.026 0.316 0.038 0.337 0.054 0.042 0.031 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.653 6.016 6.243 5.503 6.199 5.514 6.756 6.251 5.543 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 539 596 576 656 580 656 531 573 646
Service Time 4.384 3.748 3.955 3.215 3.908 3.223 4.489 3.984 3.275 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.121 0.082 0.026 0.316 0.038 0.335 0.055 0.042 0.031 HCM Control Delay 10.3 9.3 9.1 10.7 9.2 11 9.9 9.3 8.5
HCM Lane LOS BAABABAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.3 0.1 1.4 0.1 1.5 0.2 0.1 0.1
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
2: 5th St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 25 111 12 34 162 61 5 63 11 17 34 32 Future Volume (vph) 25 111 12 34 162 61 5 63 11 17 34 32 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.989 0.968 0.981 0.850
Flt Protected 0.992 0.993 0.997 0.984
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1828 0 0 1791 0 0 1822 0 0 1833 1583 Flt Permitted 0.992 0.993 0.997 0.984
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1828 0 0 1791 0 0 1822 0 0 1833 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1359 918 1174 1074
Travel Time (s) 30.9 20.9 26.7 24.4
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 25 111 12 34 162 61 5 63 11 17 34 32
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 148 0 0 257 0 0 79 0 0 51 32
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 6th AWSC
2: 5th St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 111 12 34 162 61 5 63 11 17 34 32 Future Vol, veh/h 25 111 12 34 162 61 5 63 11 17 34 32
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 25 111 12 34 162 61 5 63 11 17 34 32
Number of Lanes 010010010011
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1121
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1211
HCM Control Delay 8.7 9.5 8.7 8.5

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 6% 17% 13% 33% 0%
Vol Thru, % 80% 75% 63% 67% 0%
Vol Right, % 14% 8% 24% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 79 148 257 51 32
LT Vol 5 25 34 17 0
Through Vol 63 111 162 34 0
RT Vol 11 12 61 0 32
Lane Flow Rate 79 148 257 51 32
Geometry Grp 52277
Degree of Util (X) 0.11 0.19 0.314 0.081 0.043
Departure Headway (Hd) 5 4.618 4.404 5.706 4.832
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 714 776 815 626 738
Service Time 3.05 2.655 2.436 3.455 2.58
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.111 0.191 0.315 0.081 0.043
HCM Control Delay 8.7 8.7 9.5 9 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.7 1.3 0.3 0.1
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 123 8 68 38 5 20 129 1268 56 16 1187 119 Future Volume (vph) 123 8 68 38 5 20 129 1268 56 16 1187 119 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 15 15 12 12 11 10 12 12 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 92 0 0 60 358 0 205 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 60 25 75 75
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.866 0.850 0.994 0.986
Flt Protected 0.950 0.957 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1947 1746 0 0 1723 1478 1770 5049 0 1770 5000 0 Flt Permitted 0.727 0.723 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1484 1746 0 0 1297 1455 1770 5049 0 1770 5000 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 74 101 9 20
Link Speed (mph) 25 25 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 498 562 1142 537
Travel Time (s) 13.6 15.3 19.5 9.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 4 4 3 2 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 3 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 134 9 74 41 5 22 140 1378 61 17 1290 129 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 134 83 0 0 46 22 140 1439 0 17 1419 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 15 18 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 11111 11
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 00000 00
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 00000 00
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 8 4 4
Detector Phase 8 8 44416 52
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 6
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 3.0 12.0 3.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 15.0 26.3 15.0 26.3 Total Split (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 20.0 69.0 15.0 64.0 Total Split (%) 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 16.7% 57.5% 12.5% 53.3% Maximum Green (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 16.5 63.7 11.5 58.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.3 3.0 4.3
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -1.3 0.0 -1.3
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.0
Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 14.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 16.2 16.2 16.2 16.2 16.5 91.8 5.3 75.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.76 0.04 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.28 0.26 0.08 0.58 0.37 0.22 0.45
Control Delay 65.1 14.2 48.3 0.6 49.1 4.9 61.4 12.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 65.1 14.2 48.3 0.6 49.1 4.9 61.4 12.2

LOS E B D A D A E B
Approach Delay 45.6 32.9 8.9 12.8
Approach LOS D C A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 113 (94%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT and 6:NBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67
Intersection Signal Delay: 13.5 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 7
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 178 3 120 4 3 10 140 1209 19 27 1186 158 Future Volume (vph) 178 3 120 4 3 10 140 1209 19 27 1186 158 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 8 12 12 8
Storage Length (ft) 80 0 0 0 80 60 150 150
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 100 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.96
Frt 0.853 0.882 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1562 0 1770 1626 0 1770 5085 1372 1770 5085 1372 Flt Permitted 0.748 0.557 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1393 1562 0 1034 1626 0 1770 5085 1308 1770 5085 1314 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 130 11 52 143
Link Speed (mph) 25 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 538 406 892 1142
Travel Time (s) 14.7 9.2 15.2 19.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 5 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1136
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 193 3 130 4 3 11 152 1314 21 29 1289 172 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 193 133 0 4 14 0 152 1314 21 29 1289 172 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 16 16
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.20 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 111111
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 522166
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 8
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 36.2 36.2 15.0 15.0 15.0 17.5 17.5 15.0 18.5 18.5 Total Split (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 24.0 69.0 69.0 15.0 60.0 60.0 Total Split (%) 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 20.0% 57.5% 57.5% 12.5% 50.0% 50.0% Maximum Green (s) 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 19.5 63.5 63.5 10.5 54.5 54.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.5 -1.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 -1.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 25.0 25.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.2 20.0 82.6 82.6 7.0 65.8 65.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.69 0.69 0.06 0.55 0.55 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.34 0.02 0.05 0.52 0.38 0.02 0.28 0.46 0.22 Control Delay 63.3 9.0 35.8 20.0 40.4 4.0 0.1 85.9 9.8 1.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 63.3 9.0 35.8 20.0 40.4 4.0 0.1 85.9 9.8 1.4

LOS E A D B D A A F A A
Approach Delay 41.1 23.5 7.7 10.4
Approach LOS D C A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 111 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy Lanes, Volumes, Timings
5: Seal Beach Blvd & Towne Center Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 9
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 66 43 167 149 47 59 162 1064 77 32 1019 80 Future Volume (vph) 66 43 167 149 47 59 162 1064 77 32 1019 80 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 75 0 179 0 170 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 110 130
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.881 0.917 0.990 0.989
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1641 0 1770 1688 0 1770 5025 0 1770 5015 0 Flt Permitted 0.624 0.398 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1153 1641 0 741 1688 0 1770 5025 0 1770 5015 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 158 51 13 15
Link Speed (mph) 15 15 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 340 303 598 892
Travel Time (s) 15.5 13.8 10.2 15.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 2 12
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 72 47 182 162 51 64 176 1157 84 35 1108 87 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 72 229 0 162 115 0 176 1241 0 35 1195 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
5: Seal Beach Blvd & Towne Center Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 10
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 10.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 34.0 34.0 15.0 22.5 15.0 22.5 Total Split (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 21.0 63.0 21.0 63.0 Total Split (%) 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 17.5% 52.5% 17.5% 52.5% Maximum Green (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 16.5 57.5 16.5 57.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 23.0 23.0 10.0 10.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 15.3 77.5 7.4 65.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.65 0.06 0.55 v/c Ratio 0.28 0.47 0.98 0.28 0.79 0.38 0.32 0.43
Control Delay 39.5 15.5 109.5 22.0 95.0 2.2 82.8 2.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 39.5 15.5 109.5 22.0 95.0 2.2 82.8 2.6

LOS D B F C F A F A
Approach Delay 21.2 73.2 13.8 4.8
Approach LOS C E B A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 5 (4%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98
Intersection Signal Delay: 16.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 5: Seal Beach Blvd & Towne Center Dr Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 11
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 93 0 370 189 34 5 338 1584 166 7 1245 77 Future Volume (vph) 93 0 370 189 34 5 338 1584 166 7 1245 77 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 107 0 0 0 206 0 78 0
Storage Lanes 1 2 1 0 2 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 40 25 120 110
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.995 0.986 0.991
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.966 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 2787 1681 1700 0 3433 5001 0 1770 5034 0 Flt Permitted 0.662 0.950 0.966 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1224 0 2787 1681 1700 0 3433 5001 0 1770 5034 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 102 1 21 10
Link Speed (mph) 25 15 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 526 300 909 598
Travel Time (s) 14.3 13.6 15.5 10.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 1 1 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 52
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 101 0 402 205 37 5 367 1722 180 8 1353 84 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 49%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 101 0 402 105 142 0 367 1902 0 8 1437 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm pm+ov Split NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 5 3 3 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4
Detector Phase 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 12
Lane Group Ø8
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor
Ped Bike Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Adj. Flow (vph)
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Enter Blocked Intersection
Lane Alignment
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor
Turning Speed (mph)
Number of Detectors
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft)
Trailing Detector (ft)
Detector 1 Position(ft)
Detector 1 Size(ft)
Detector 1 Type
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s)
Detector 1 Queue (s)
Detector 1 Delay (s)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 8
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 13
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 22.5 15.0 28.5 Total Split (s) 20.0 25.0 22.0 22.0 25.0 63.0 15.0 53.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 20.8% 18.3% 18.3% 20.8% 52.5% 12.5% 44.2% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 20.5 18.0 18.0 20.5 57.5 10.5 47.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 10.0 16.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 14.2 35.5 15.3 15.3 17.4 76.4 5.7 57.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.30 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.64 0.05 0.48 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.45 0.49 0.66 0.74 0.60 0.10 0.60
Control Delay 75.7 26.0 56.2 63.7 67.3 8.5 65.9 15.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 75.7 26.0 56.2 63.7 67.3 8.5 65.9 15.3

LOS E C E E E A E B
Approach Delay 36.0 60.5 18.0 15.6
Approach LOS D E B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 4 (3%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74
Intersection Signal Delay: 21.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 14
Lane Group Ø8
Minimum Initial (s) 2.0
Minimum Split (s) 35.0
Total Split (s) 42.0
Total Split (%) 35%
Maximum Green (s) 39.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 0.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0
Recall Mode None
Walk Time (s) 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 25.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Seal Beach Blvd & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 15
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 322 447 1508 413 447 1202
Future Volume (vph) 322 447 1508 413 447 1202
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 147 299 319
Storage Lanes 2 1 1 2
Taper Length (ft) 25 150
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91
Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 5085 1583 3433 5085
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1558 5085 1555 3433 5085
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 61
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 40
Link Distance (ft) 707 802 909
Travel Time (s) 10.7 12.2 15.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 350 486 1639 449 486 1307
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 350 486 1639 449 486 1307
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left
Median Width(ft) 36 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15
Number of Detectors 111111
Detector Template Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 20 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 100 20 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot pm+ov NA pm+ov Prot NA
Protected Phases 812816
Permitted Phases 8 2
Detector Phase 882216
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Seal Beach Blvd & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 16
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 38.3 15.0 35.5 38.3 15.0 15.0
Total Split (s) 38.0 31.0 51.0 38.0 31.0 82.0
Total Split (%) 31.7% 25.8% 42.5% 31.7% 25.8% 68.3%
Maximum Green (s) 33.0 26.5 45.5 33.0 26.5 76.5
Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.5 4.0 3.5 4.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.3 -0.5 -1.5 -1.3 -0.5 -1.5
Total Lost Time (s) 3.7 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 5.0 3.0 2.0 5.0
Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 26.0 23.0 26.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 20.8 47.5 60.5 81.6 27.0 91.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.40 0.50 0.68 0.22 0.76
v/c Ratio 0.59 0.78 0.64 0.42 0.63 0.34
Control Delay 48.0 36.5 20.8 3.3 33.8 3.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 48.0 36.5 20.8 3.3 33.8 3.2

LOS D D C A C A
Approach Delay 41.3 17.0 11.5
Approach LOS D B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 98 (82%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78
Intersection Signal Delay: 19.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 7: Seal Beach Blvd & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
8: Seal Beach Blvd & Old Ranch Pkwy 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 17
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 28 43 48 328 18 525 29 1263 548 217 1120 254 Future Volume (vph) 28 43 48 328 18 525 29 1263 548 217 1120 254 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 117 0 217 124 0 260 392
Storage Lanes 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 60 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.861 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 3433 1524 1504 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1863 1583 3433 1524 1504 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 145 246 325 542 276
Link Speed (mph) 30 35 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 663 410 1873 802
Travel Time (s) 15.1 8.0 28.4 12.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 30 47 52 357 20 571 32 1373 596 236 1217 276 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 43%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 30 47 52 357 266 325 32 1373 596 236 1217 276 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 111111111111
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 000000000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 7 8 2 2 6
Detector Phase 777888522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 44.2 44.2 44.2 12.2 15.3 15.3 12.2 35.3 35.3 Total Split (s) 14.0 14.0 14.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 13.0 37.0 37.0 24.0 48.0 48.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings
8: Seal Beach Blvd & Old Ranch Pkwy 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 18
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Split (%) 11.7% 11.7% 11.7% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% 10.8% 30.8% 30.8% 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 9.8 9.8 9.8 40.8 40.8 40.8 8.8 31.7 31.7 19.8 42.7 42.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 4.3 4.3 3.2 4.3 4.3 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -1.1 -1.1 -1.1 -0.2 -1.8 -1.8 -0.2 -1.8 -1.8 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.1 3.1 3.1 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 25.0 25.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.2 9.2 9.2 19.9 19.9 19.9 8.7 66.5 66.5 12.8 75.5 75.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.55 0.55 0.11 0.63 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.33 0.20 0.63 0.58 0.62 0.13 0.49 0.53 0.64 0.38 0.25 Control Delay 55.9 58.8 1.8 51.1 12.2 10.1 30.6 5.9 2.8 62.3 10.1 2.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.9 58.8 1.8 51.1 12.2 10.1 30.6 5.9 2.8 62.3 10.1 2.6

LOS E E A D B B C A A E B A
Approach Delay 35.1 26.1 5.4 16.0
Approach LOS D C A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 46 (38%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 105
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64
Intersection Signal Delay: 14.1 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 8: Seal Beach Blvd & Old Ranch Pkwy
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
9: Seal Beach Blvd & N Gate Rd 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 19
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 24 7 16 434 6 440 7 1276 314 348 1192 25 Future Volume (vph) 24 7 16 434 6 440 7 1276 314 348 1192 25 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 100 0 100 86 225 650 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 83 120
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frt 0.950 0.850 0.850 0.997
Flt Protected 0.975 0.950 0.954 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3278 0 1681 1688 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 5070 0 Flt Permitted 0.975 0.950 0.954 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3278 0 1681 1688 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 5070 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 333 289 3
Link Speed (mph) 35 40 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 991 994 1529 1873
Travel Time (s) 19.3 16.9 20.9 25.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 26 8 17 472 7 478 8 1387 341 378 1296 27 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 44%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 51 0 264 215 478 8 1387 341 378 1323 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 11111111
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 00000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 00000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Split NA Split NA Free Prot NA Perm Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 2
Detector Phase 4 4 3 3 52216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 15.7 15.7 12.2 23.7 Total Split (s) 21.0 21.0 25.0 25.0 13.0 40.0 40.0 34.0 61.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings
9: Seal Beach Blvd & N Gate Rd 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 20
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Split (%) 17.5% 17.5% 20.8% 20.8% 10.8% 33.3% 33.3% 28.3% 50.8% Maximum Green (s) 16.8 16.8 20.8 20.8 8.8 34.3 34.3 29.8 55.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 4.7 4.7 3.2 4.7
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.1 -1.4 -1.4 -0.2 -2.2 -2.2 -0.2 -2.2 Total Lost Time (s) 3.1 2.8 2.8 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5
Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 20.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 13.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.1 21.4 21.4 120.0 8.2 48.6 48.6 30.0 80.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.18 0.18 1.00 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.25 0.67 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.88 0.72 0.30 0.07 0.67 0.42 0.86 0.39
Control Delay 39.7 77.9 60.5 0.5 53.7 32.1 6.8 55.8 4.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 39.7 77.9 60.5 0.5 53.7 32.1 6.8 55.8 4.3

LOS D E E A D C A E A
Approach Delay 39.7 35.3 27.3 15.8
Approach LOS D D C B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 33 (28%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.7 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 9: Seal Beach Blvd & N Gate Rd
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 21
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Ø2 Ø4
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 58 1792 1122 212
Future Volume (vph) 0 0 58 1792 1122 212
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 115
Storage Lanes 0 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.98
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 5085 5085 1583
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 5085 5085 1557
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 230
Link Speed (mph) 15 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 370 174 1529
Travel Time (s) 16.8 2.4 20.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 63 1948 1220 230
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 63 1948 1220 230
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 0 16 16
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1111
Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 100 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 4 6 2 4
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase 5 2 4 6 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 22
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Ø2 Ø4
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 8.0 26.7 26.7 15.7 15.0
Total Split (s) 8.0 31.0 31.0 47.0 23.0
Total Split (%) 11.4% 44.3% 44.3% 67% 33%
Maximum Green (s) 6.0 25.3 25.3 41.3 19.0
Yellow Time (s) 2.0 4.7 4.7 4.7 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.5 -1.7 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 1.5 4.0 5.7
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max None
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 14.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.4 70.0 38.2 36.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 1.00 0.55 0.52
v/c Ratio 0.39 0.38 0.44 0.25
Control Delay 46.0 1.5 10.7 2.4
Queue Delay 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.3 1.5 10.7 2.4

LOS D A B A
Approach Delay 2.9 9.4
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 70
Offset: 17 (24%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 50
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.45
Intersection Signal Delay: 5.6 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd Lanes, Volumes, Timings
11: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 23
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Ø5
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 234 51 0 1619 1123 0
Future Volume (vph) 234 51 0 1619 1123 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 13 16 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 91 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.91 1.00
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3547 1794 0 6408 5085 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3547 1794 0 6408 5085 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 55
Link Speed (mph) 15 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 316 1806 174
Travel Time (s) 14.4 24.6 2.4
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 254 55 0 1760 1221 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 254 55 0 1760 1221 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 26 4 4
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.96 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Right Thru Thru
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 100 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA
Protected Phases 4 2 6 5
Permitted Phases 4
Detector Phase 4 4 2 6
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
11: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 24
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Ø5
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.7 26.7 8.0
Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 47.0 31.0 8.0
Total Split (%) 32.9% 32.9% 67.1% 44.3% 11%
Maximum Green (s) 19.0 19.0 41.3 25.3 6.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 4.7 4.7 2.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 -1.7 -1.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None C-Max C-Max None
Walk Time (s) 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 19.0 19.0 43.0 38.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.61 0.55
v/c Ratio 0.26 0.10 0.45 0.44
Control Delay 20.9 6.8 12.7 1.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 20.9 6.8 12.7 1.6

LOS C A B A
Approach Delay 18.4 12.7 1.6
Approach LOS B B A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 70
Offset: 17 (24%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 50
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.45
Intersection Signal Delay: 9.1 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 11: Seal Beach Blvd & Golden Rain Rd Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Andrews Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 25
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 163 78 73 1315 1203 57
Future Volume (vph) 163 78 73 1315 1203 57
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 110 0 175 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 70 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91
Ped Bike Factor 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.993
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 5085 5044 0
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 5085 5044 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 85 13
Link Speed (mph) 15 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 538 1002 1806
Travel Time (s) 24.5 13.7 24.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 177 85 79 1429 1308 62
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 177 85 79 1429 1370 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 11111
Detector Template Left Right Left Thru Thru
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 20 100 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 00000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 20 100 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4
Detector Phase 44526
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Andrews Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 26
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 2.0 15.0 15.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 20.7 21.7
Total Split (s) 18.0 18.0 17.0 52.0 35.0
Total Split (%) 25.7% 25.7% 24.3% 74.3% 50.0%
Maximum Green (s) 14.0 14.0 12.5 46.3 29.3
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.7 4.7
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.7 -1.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 9.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.9 10.9 8.0 51.1 40.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.73 0.58
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.27 0.39 0.39 0.46
Control Delay 38.3 8.7 33.0 3.9 4.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 38.3 8.7 33.0 3.9 4.4

LOS D A C A A
Approach Delay 28.7 5.4 4.4
Approach LOS C A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 70
Offset: 48 (69%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64
Intersection Signal Delay: 6.9 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 12: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Andrews Dr Lanes, Volumes, Timings
13: Seal Beach Blvd /Seal Beach Blvd & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025 Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 27
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 411 522 35 245 638 246 87 957 162 178 797 244 Future Volume (vph) 411 522 35 245 638 246 87 957 162 178 797 244 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 0 280 0 265 0 284 187
Storage Lanes 2 0 2 0 1 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 125 95 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98
Frt 0.991 0.958 0.978 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5040 0 3433 3391 0 1770 4962 0 3433 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5040 0 3433 3391 0 1770 4962 0 3433 5085 1559 Right Turn on Red No Yes Yes No
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 46 24
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 50
Link Distance (ft) 1322 799 861 1002
Travel Time (s) 20.0 12.1 23.5 13.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 437 555 37 261 679 262 93 1018 172 189 848 260 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 437 592 0 261 941 0 93 1190 0 189 848 260 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
13: Seal Beach Blvd /Seal Beach Blvd & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025 Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 28
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 39.2 8.0 36.0 8.0 31.2 7.7 35.7 35.7 Total Split (s) 22.0 51.0 26.0 55.0 17.0 45.0 18.0 46.0 46.0 Total Split (%) 15.7% 36.4% 18.6% 39.3% 12.1% 32.1% 12.9% 32.9% 32.9% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 45.0 21.0 49.0 12.0 39.3 13.3 40.3 40.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 4.7 3.0 4.7 4.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.7 -2.8 -1.7 -2.8 -1.7 -3.2 -1.7 -3.2 -3.2 Total Lost Time (s) 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.3 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0
Time Before Reduce (s) 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max C-Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 25.0 20.0 23.0 23.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 00
Act Effct Green (s) 21.6 52.2 16.7 47.3 13.7 45.8 13.3 45.1 45.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.37 0.12 0.34 0.10 0.33 0.10 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.31 0.64 0.80 0.54 0.73 0.58 0.52 0.52
Control Delay 71.2 31.9 65.8 45.4 67.3 40.3 58.1 39.7 42.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 71.2 31.9 65.8 45.4 67.3 40.3 58.1 39.7 42.5

LOS E C E D E D E D D
Approach Delay 48.6 49.8 42.2 42.9
Approach LOS DDDD
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 95
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 45.7 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 13: Seal Beach Blvd /Seal Beach Blvd & Westminster Ave Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Seal Beach Blvd & Road C 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 29
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 12 0 63 0 0 0 21 1081 0 0 0 891
Future Volume (vph) 12 0 63 0 0 0 21 1081 0 0 0 891
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 12 15 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 0 192 0 196
Storage Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 60 80
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 0 1742 0 0 0 1770 5085 0 1863 0 5085 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 0 1742 0 0 0 1770 5085 0 1863 0 5085 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 201
Link Speed (mph) 15 15 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 316 163 1791 695
Travel Time (s) 14.4 7.4 24.4 9.5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 13 0 68 0 0 0 23 1175 0 0 0 968
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 13 0 68 0 0 0 23 1175 0 0 0 968
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right R NA Left Left Median Width(ft) 11 11 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 9 15
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Right Left Thru Left Thru
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4
Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Seal Beach Blvd & Road C 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 30
Lane Group SBR Ø8
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 17
Future Volume (vph) 17
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12
Storage Length (ft) 99
Storage Lanes 1
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.98
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 1583
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 1545
Right Turn on Red Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 86
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 18
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 18
Enter Blocked Intersection No
Lane Alignment Right
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9
Number of Detectors 1
Detector Template Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0
Turn Type Perm
Protected Phases 8
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Seal Beach Blvd & Road C 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 31
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 10.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.7 15.0 22.7
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 15.0 33.0 15.0 33.0
Total Split (%) 31.4% 31.4% 21.4% 47.1% 21.4% 47.1%
Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 10.5 27.3 10.5 27.3
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.7 3.5 4.7
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.7 -0.5 -1.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0
Recall Mode None None None C-Max None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 12.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.2 6.2 6.0 61.2 56.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.87 0.81
v/c Ratio 0.09 0.20 0.15 0.26 0.23
Control Delay 30.2 1.3 31.9 1.4 0.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 30.2 1.3 31.9 1.4 0.4

LOS C A C A A
Approach Delay 6.0 2.0 0.4
Approach LOS A A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 70
Offset: 5 (7%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.26
Intersection Signal Delay: 1.4 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 14: Seal Beach Blvd & Road C
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Seal Beach Blvd & Road C 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 32
Lane Group SBR Ø8
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.7 39.0
Total Split (s) 33.0 22.0
Total Split (%) 47.1% 31%
Maximum Green (s) 27.3 18.0
Yellow Time (s) 4.7 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 2.0
Recall Mode C-Max None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 12.0 30.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 56.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.81
v/c Ratio 0.01
Control Delay 0.0
Queue Delay 0.0
Total Delay 0.0
LOS A
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Seal Beach Blvd & Apollo Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 33
Lane Group NBL NBT SBT SBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 4 1080 976 12 40 15
Future Volume (vph) 4 1080 976 12 40 15
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 11 16
Storage Length (ft) 180 162 0 92
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 60 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 5085 1583 1711 1794
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 5085 1539 1711 1794
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 13 16
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 25
Link Distance (ft) 577 1791 717
Travel Time (s) 7.9 24.4 19.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 4 1174 1061 13 43 16
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 1174 1061 13 43 16
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 16 12 21
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 0.85
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 122111
Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Seal Beach Blvd & Apollo Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 34
Lane Group NBL NBT SBT SBR SEL SER
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 6 4
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 526644
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 17.7 26.7 26.7 15.0 15.0
Total Split (s) 15.0 51.0 36.0 36.0 19.0 19.0
Total Split (%) 21.4% 72.9% 51.4% 51.4% 27.1% 27.1%
Maximum Green (s) 10.5 45.3 30.3 30.3 15.0 15.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.5 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max None None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 16.0 16.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.5 60.3 57.8 57.8 7.3 7.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.86 0.83 0.83 0.10 0.10
v/c Ratio 0.02 0.27 0.25 0.01 0.24 0.08
Control Delay 46.0 0.5 0.6 0.1 31.6 14.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.0 0.5 0.6 0.1 31.6 14.7

LOS D A A A C B
Approach Delay 0.6 0.6 27.0
Approach LOS A A C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 70
Offset: 53 (76%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.27
Intersection Signal Delay: 1.3 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 15: Seal Beach Blvd & Apollo Dr
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
16: Seal Beach Blvd & Adolfo Lopez Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 35
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 32 10 9 1052 977 14
Future Volume (vph) 32 10 9 1052 977 14
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 13 16 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 240 191 90
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1829 1794 1770 5085 5085 1583
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1829 1794 1770 5085 5085 1540
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 11 15
Link Speed (mph) 25 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 715 1223 577
Travel Time (s) 19.5 16.7 7.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 35 11 10 1143 1062 15
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 11 10 1143 1062 15
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 13 16 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.96 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 111221
Detector Template Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 20 100 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 20 6 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
16: Seal Beach Blvd & Adolfo Lopez Dr 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 36
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 6
Detector Phase 445266
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 17.7 26.7 26.7
Total Split (s) 19.0 19.0 15.0 51.0 36.0 36.0
Total Split (%) 27.1% 27.1% 21.4% 72.9% 51.4% 51.4%
Maximum Green (s) 15.0 15.0 10.5 45.3 30.3 30.3
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.7 4.7 4.7
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 16.0 16.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.9 7.9 8.5 60.0 57.5 57.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.86 0.82 0.82
v/c Ratio 0.17 0.05 0.05 0.26 0.25 0.01
Control Delay 29.5 15.4 29.6 1.9 0.3 0.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 29.5 15.4 29.6 1.9 0.3 0.0

LOS C B C A A A
Approach Delay 26.1 2.1 0.3
Approach LOS C A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 70
Offset: 53 (76%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.26
Intersection Signal Delay: 1.8 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 16: Seal Beach Blvd & Adolfo Lopez Dr Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Seal Beach Blvd & Heron Pointe/Forrestal Ln 05/29/2025 Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 37
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 28 0 14 39 0 73 8 960 8 16 941 26
Future Volume (vph) 28 0 14 39 0 73 8 960 8 16 941 26
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 90 0 120 289 0 192 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 60 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.999 0.996
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1770 1583 0 1770 1583 1770 5080 0 1770 5063 0 Flt Permitted 0.730 0.738 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1360 1583 0 1375 1583 1770 5080 0 1770 5063 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 206 206 2 7
Link Speed (mph) 15 15 40 50
Link Distance (ft) 253 838 2064 1223
Travel Time (s) 11.5 38.1 35.2 16.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 30 0 15 42 0 79 9 1043 9 17 1023 28
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 30 15 0 42 79 9 1052 0 17 1051 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 11111112 12
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 00000000 00
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000000 00
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Seal Beach Blvd & Heron Pointe/Forrestal Ln 05/29/2025 Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 38
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8
Detector Phase 44488852 16
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 15.0 25.0 15.0 24.7 Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 16.0 33.0 15.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 22.9% 47.1% 21.4% 45.7% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 11.5 27.0 10.5 26.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 3.5 4.7 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -2.0 -0.5 -1.7 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 6.6 54.8 5.8 53.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.78 0.08 0.77 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.04 0.28 0.22 0.05 0.26 0.12 0.27
Control Delay 30.6 0.2 32.5 1.4 27.2 2.9 26.5 3.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 30.6 0.2 32.5 1.4 27.2 2.9 26.5 3.3

LOS C A C A C A C A
Approach Delay 20.5 12.2 3.1 3.7
Approach LOS C B A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 70
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.28
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.2 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 17: Seal Beach Blvd & Heron Pointe/Forrestal Ln Lanes, Volumes, Timings
18: Seal Beach Blvd & Bolsa Ave/Anchor Way 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 39
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 187 11 16 11 8 26 13 761 9 32 692 266 Future Volume (vph) 187 11 16 11 8 26 13 761 9 32 692 266 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 40 167 0 189 0 198 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 95 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.94 1.00 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.886 0.998 0.958
Flt Protected 0.955 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1779 1583 1770 1650 0 1770 5073 0 1770 4831 0 Flt Permitted 0.955 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1779 1483 1770 1650 0 1770 5073 0 1770 4831 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 136 28 1 85
Link Speed (mph) 30 15 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1498 1062 1153 2064
Travel Time (s) 34.0 48.3 15.7 28.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 49 4 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 203 12 17 12 9 28 14 827 10 35 752 289
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 215 17 12 37 0 14 837 0 35 1041 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 12 15 16
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 11111 12 12
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 00000 00 00
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000 00 00
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
18: Seal Beach Blvd & Bolsa Ave/Anchor Way 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 40
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Split NA Perm Split NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4
Detector Phase 44433 52 16
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 18.0 3.0 18.0 Minimum Split (s) 44.6 44.6 44.6 15.0 15.0 15.0 31.0 15.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 46.0 46.0 46.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 61.0 17.0 62.0 Total Split (%) 32.9% 32.9% 32.9% 11.4% 11.4% 11.4% 43.6% 12.1% 44.3% Maximum Green (s) 41.4 41.4 41.4 12.0 12.0 11.5 55.0 12.5 56.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -2.0 -0.5 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 18.0 13.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 23.8 23.8 7.9 7.9 6.2 84.7 11.4 93.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.60 0.08 0.67 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.05 0.12 0.31 0.18 0.27 0.24 0.32
Control Delay 67.3 0.2 64.4 34.1 78.3 11.6 55.2 8.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 67.3 0.2 64.4 34.1 78.3 11.6 55.2 8.1

LOS E A E C E B E A
Approach Delay 62.4 41.5 12.7 9.6
Approach LOS E D B A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 85 (61%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71
Intersection Signal Delay: 17.1 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 18: Seal Beach Blvd & Bolsa Ave/Anchor Way Lanes, Volumes, Timings
19: Seal Beach Blvd & Marlin Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 41
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 13 12 17 638 770 37
Future Volume (vph) 13 12 17 638 770 37
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 85
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91
Frt 0.935 0.993
Flt Protected 0.975 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1698 0 1770 5085 5050 0
Flt Permitted 0.975 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1698 0 1770 5085 5050 0
Link Speed (mph) 25 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 591 614 1153
Travel Time (s) 16.1 8.4 15.7
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph) 13 12 17 638 770 37
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 25 0 17 638 807 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 6th TWSC
19: Seal Beach Blvd & Marlin Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 42
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 12 17 638 770 37
Future Vol, veh/h 13 12 17 638 770 37
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 100 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 13 12 17 638 770 37
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1078 404 807 0 - 0
Stage 1 789 -----
Stage 2 289 -----
Critical Hdwy 5.74 7.14 5.34 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.82 3.92 3.12 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 284 509 485 - - -
Stage 1 325 -----
Stage 2 674 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 274 509 485 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 274 -----
Stage 1 314 -----
Stage 2 674 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 16 0.3 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 485 - 352 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - 0.071 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 - 16 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.2 - -
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
20: Seal Beach Blvd & Pacific Coast Hwy 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 43
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 225 830 21 60 785 453 17 128 56 375 189 232 Future Volume (vph) 225 830 21 60 785 453 17 128 56 375 189 232 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 170 78 159 496 97 99 200 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 60 90 60 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.954 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3376 0 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3376 0 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 118 145 40 252
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1196 1066 687 614
Travel Time (s) 20.4 18.2 9.4 8.4
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 245 902 23 65 853 492 18 139 61 408 205 252 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 245 902 23 65 853 492 18 200 0 408 205 252 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 18 18 24 29
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 11111112 121
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 00000000 000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000000 000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 6 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 52344 33
Permitted Phases 6 2 3
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
20: Seal Beach Blvd & Pacific Coast Hwy 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 44
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 16652344 333
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.6 44.0 44.0 10.6 44.0 43.3 11.3 11.3 43.3 43.3 43.3 Total Split (s) 21.0 63.0 63.0 18.0 60.0 37.0 22.0 22.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 Total Split (%) 15.0% 45.0% 45.0% 12.9% 42.9% 26.4% 15.7% 15.7% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% Maximum Green (s) 15.4 56.0 56.0 12.4 53.0 30.7 15.7 15.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.6 5.0 5.0 3.6 5.0 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.6 7.0 7.0 5.6 7.0 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 8.0 8.0 3.0 8.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 22.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 15.4 70.7 70.7 10.1 63.0 94.8 11.6 11.6 24.8 24.8 24.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.45 0.68 0.08 0.08 0.18 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 1.26 0.50 0.03 0.51 0.54 0.44 0.12 0.63 0.67 0.62 0.52 Control Delay 201.5 26.7 0.0 76.2 30.7 8.6 59.9 58.5 55.7 57.5 20.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 201.5 26.7 0.0 76.2 30.7 8.6 59.9 58.5 55.7 57.5 20.1

LOS F C A E C A E E E E C
Approach Delay 62.8 25.1 58.6 45.8
Approach LOS E C E D
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 105 (75%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.26
Intersection Signal Delay: 44.0 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 20: Seal Beach Blvd & Pacific Coast Hwy Lanes, Volumes, Timings
21: Old Ranch Plaza & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 45
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 4 822 34 7 727 0 42 0 10 0 1 0
Future Volume (vph) 4 822 34 7 727 0 42 0 10 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 110 150 105 0 0 35 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 80 75 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 0 0 1770 1583 0 1863 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.757
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 0 0 1410 1583 0 1863 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 45 57
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 707 2617 340 327
Travel Time (s) 10.7 39.7 9.3 8.9
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 822 34 7 727 0 42 0 10 0 1 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 822 34 7 727 0 0 42 10 0 1 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 12112 12112
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 00000 00000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000 00000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6666
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8
Permitted Phases 6 4 4 8
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
21: Old Ranch Plaza & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 46
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 16652 44488
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.3 22.3 8.0 20.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 33.0 51.0 51.0 33.0 51.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 27.5% 42.5% 42.5% 27.5% 42.5% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% Maximum Green (s) 29.0 45.7 45.7 29.0 45.7 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.3 4.3 3.0 4.3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 12.0 12.0 6.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 00000
Act Effct Green (s) 5.9 102.4 102.4 6.1 102.5 9.1 9.1 9.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.85 0.85 0.05 0.85 0.08 0.08 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.27 0.03 0.08 0.24 0.40 0.06 0.01
Control Delay 52.8 2.7 0.7 55.7 2.8 62.8 0.6 49.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 52.8 2.7 0.7 55.7 2.8 62.8 0.6 49.0

LOS D A A E A E A D
Approach Delay 2.8 3.3 50.8 49.0
Approach LOS A A D D
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.40
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.6 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 21: Old Ranch Plaza & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
22: Basswood St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 47
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 26 638 116 11 568 3 124 0 10 4 3 38 Future Volume (vph) 26 638 116 11 568 3 124 0 10 4 3 38 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 115 0 175 0 85 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 100 75 60 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.977 0.999 0.850 0.886
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.996
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3458 0 1770 3536 0 1770 1583 0 0 1644 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.728 0.979
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3458 0 1770 3536 0 1356 1583 0 0 1616 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 1 371 38
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 2617 1278 620 461
Travel Time (s) 39.7 19.4 16.9 12.6
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 26 638 116 11 568 3 124 0 10 4 3 38
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 754 0 11 571 0 124 10 0 0 45 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6666
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4
Permitted Phases 8 4
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
22: Basswood St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 48
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.0 20.0 9.0 21.3 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 30.0 20.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 33.3% 22.2% 50.0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 24.7 16.0 39.7 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.3 3.0 4.3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 5.3 4.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0
Recall Mode None Min None Min None None None None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 7.0 11.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.5 22.4 5.4 22.2 9.8 9.8 9.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.57 0.14 0.57 0.25 0.25 0.24
v/c Ratio 0.09 0.38 0.04 0.28 0.36 0.01 0.11
Control Delay 17.8 8.0 19.1 8.1 17.1 0.0 7.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 17.8 8.0 19.1 8.1 17.1 0.0 7.3

LOS B A B A B A A
Approach Delay 8.3 8.3 15.8 7.3
Approach LOS AABA
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 39
Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.38
Intersection Signal Delay: 8.9 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 22: Basswood St & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
23: Candlebury Ave & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 49
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 541 111 24 512 70 18
Future Volume (vph) 541 111 24 512 70 18
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 160 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 75 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.974 0.972
Flt Protected 0.950 0.962
Satd. Flow (prot) 3447 0 1770 3539 1742 0
Flt Permitted 0.404 0.962
Satd. Flow (perm) 3447 0 753 3539 1742 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 49 18
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25
Link Distance (ft) 1278 2619 927
Travel Time (s) 19.4 39.7 25.3
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph) 541 111 24 512 70 18
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 652 0 24 512 88 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 7 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1
Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left
Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot
Protected Phases 2 2 4
Permitted Phases 2
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
23: Candlebury Ave & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 50
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR
Detector Phase 2 2 2 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 24.0
Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Maximum Green (s) 24.5 24.5 24.5 26.0
Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max Max Max None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 15.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 39.1 39.1 39.1 7.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.04 0.18 0.32
Control Delay 3.1 3.8 3.1 18.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.1 3.8 3.1 18.7

LOS A A A B
Approach Delay 3.1 3.1 18.7
Approach LOS A A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 49.5
Natural Cycle: 45
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.32
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.2 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 23: Candlebury Ave & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
24: Heather St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 51
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 499 60 65 484 52 46
Future Volume (vph) 499 60 65 484 52 46
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 150 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 80 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.984 0.937
Flt Protected 0.950 0.974
Satd. Flow (prot) 3483 0 1770 3539 1700 0
Flt Permitted 0.442 0.974
Satd. Flow (perm) 3483 0 823 3539 1700 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 26 46
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25
Link Distance (ft) 2619 1584 691
Travel Time (s) 39.7 24.0 18.8
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph) 499 60 65 484 52 46
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 559 0 65 484 98 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1
Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left
Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot
Protected Phases 2 2 4
Permitted Phases 2
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
24: Heather St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 52
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Detector Phase 2 2 2 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 25.0
Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Maximum Green (s) 24.5 24.5 24.5 25.0
Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max Max Max None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 7.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.21 0.10 0.18 0.34
Control Delay 3.3 4.3 3.4 14.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.3 4.3 3.4 14.7

LOS A A A B
Approach Delay 3.3 3.5 14.7
Approach LOS A A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 48.8
Natural Cycle: 45
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.34
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.3 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 24: Heather St & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
25: Rose St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 53
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 528 33 65 489 28 51
Future Volume (vph) 528 33 65 489 28 51
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 65 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.991 0.913
Flt Protected 0.950 0.983
Satd. Flow (prot) 3507 0 1770 3539 1672 0
Flt Permitted 0.442 0.983
Satd. Flow (perm) 3507 0 823 3539 1672 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 13 51
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25
Link Distance (ft) 1584 1257 867
Travel Time (s) 24.0 19.0 23.6
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph) 528 33 65 489 28 51
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 561 0 65 489 79 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1
Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left
Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot
Protected Phases 2 2 4
Permitted Phases 2
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
25: Rose St & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 54
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Detector Phase 2 2 2 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0
Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 28.0
Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Maximum Green (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 25.0
Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max Max Max None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 18.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 39.1 39.1 39.1 7.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.20 0.10 0.18 0.27
Control Delay 3.3 4.1 3.2 12.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.3 4.1 3.2 12.4

LOS A A A B
Approach Delay 3.3 3.4 12.4
Approach LOS A A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 49.7
Natural Cycle: 50
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.27
Intersection Signal Delay: 3.9 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 25: Rose St & Lampson Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
26: Tulip St/Parkewood & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 55
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 7 545 27 76 516 17 27 0 60 8 0 11
Future Volume (vph) 7 545 27 76 516 17 27 0 60 8 0 11
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 80 0 65 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 85 80 35 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.993 0.995 0.850 0.922
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.979
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3514 0 1770 3522 0 1770 1583 0 0 1681 0 Flt Permitted 0.454 0.437 0.930 0.836
Satd. Flow (perm) 846 3514 0 814 3522 0 1732 1583 0 0 1436 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 10 6 183 55
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 1257 1023 510 526
Travel Time (s) 19.0 15.5 13.9 14.3
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 545 27 76 516 17 27 0 60 8 0 11
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 572 0 76 533 0 27 60 0 0 19 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6666
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 2244
Permitted Phases 2244
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
26: Tulip St/Parkewood & Lampson Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 56
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Maximum Green (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max Max Max Max None None None None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 35.1 35.1 35.1 35.1 7.2 7.2 7.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.16 0.16 0.16
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.21 0.12 0.20 0.10 0.15 0.07
Control Delay 4.0 3.5 4.6 3.5 17.0 0.8 2.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.0 3.5 4.6 3.5 17.0 0.8 2.2

LOS A A A A B A A
Approach Delay 3.6 3.6 5.8 2.2
Approach LOS AAAA
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 46
Natural Cycle: 50
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.21
Intersection Signal Delay: 3.7 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 26: Tulip St/Parkewood & Lampson Ave Lanes, Volumes, Timings
27: Apollo Dr & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 57
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 859 13 40 1027 146 99
Future Volume (vph) 859 13 40 1027 146 99
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 207 220 0 90
Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 1770 3539 1770 1583
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1529 1770 3539 1770 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 14 108
Link Speed (mph) 50 45 25
Link Distance (ft) 1365 937 502
Travel Time (s) 18.6 14.2 13.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 934 14 43 1116 159 108
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 934 14 43 1116 159 108
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 111111
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 1 6 8
Permitted Phases 2 8
Detector Phase 221688
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
27: Apollo Dr & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 58
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 4.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 7.7 16.2 8.6 8.6
Total Split (s) 25.0 25.0 15.0 40.0 20.0 20.0
Total Split (%) 41.7% 41.7% 25.0% 66.7% 33.3% 33.3%
Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 11.0 35.0 16.0 16.0
Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -3.2 -3.2 -1.7 -2.8 -1.6 -1.6
Total Lost Time (s) 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 13.0 13.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 40.8 40.8 9.2 46.4 11.3 11.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.15 0.77 0.19 0.19
v/c Ratio 0.39 0.01 0.16 0.41 0.48 0.28
Control Delay 8.2 5.5 19.5 2.9 25.8 6.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.2 5.5 19.5 2.9 25.8 6.7

LOS A A B A C A
Approach Delay 8.2 3.5 18.0
Approach LOS A A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 60
Offset: 15 (25%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.48
Intersection Signal Delay: 7.0 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 27: Apollo Dr & Westminster Ave
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
28: Kitts Hwy-Alfa Rd & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 59
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 961 7 5 1260 0 13 2 22 7 2 39
Future Volume (vph) 1 961 7 5 1260 0 13 2 22 7 2 39
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 260 0 715 0 75 55 0 75
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.857
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 1596 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.728 0.757
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1544 1770 3539 0 1356 1863 1583 1410 1596 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 91 155 43
Link Speed (mph) 45 60 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 799 6309 1679 2824
Travel Time (s) 12.1 71.7 45.8 77.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 1 1068 8 6 1400 0 14 2 24 8 2 43
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1068 8 6 1400 0 14 2 24 8 45 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 11111 11111
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 00000 00000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 00000 00000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 8
Permitted Phases 2 4 4 8
Detector Phase 52216 44488
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
28: Kitts Hwy-Alfa Rd & Westminster Ave 05/29/2025
Existing PM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 3:32 pm 03/26/2025 Existing Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 60
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 31.5 31.5 7.0 27.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 28.0 28.0 10.0 24.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (%) 23.3% 46.7% 46.7% 16.7% 40.0% 36.7% 36.7% 36.7% 36.7% 36.7% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 20.5 20.5 6.0 16.5 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.7 -3.8 -3.8 -1.7 -4.9 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 Total Lost Time (s) 2.3 3.7 3.7 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 19.0 19.0 15.0 27.0 27.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.3 49.4 49.4 6.5 50.1 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.82 0.82 0.11 0.84 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.37 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.08 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.18 Control Delay 24.0 3.6 0.0 24.2 3.9 23.2 22.0 0.4 22.4 10.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 24.0 3.6 0.0 24.2 3.9 23.2 22.0 0.4 22.4 10.6

LOS C A A C A C C A C B
Approach Delay 3.6 4.0 9.4 12.3
Approach LOS AAAB
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 60
Offset: 11 (18%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.1 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 28: Kitts Hwy-Alfa Rd & Westminster Ave

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
1: 1st St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 75 25 20 125 55 50 25 5 25 20 10 Future Volume (vph) 5 75 25 20 125 55 50 25 5 25 20 10
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 65 0 70 0 50 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 70 50 50
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.962 0.954 0.975 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1792 0 1770 1777 0 1770 1816 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1792 0 1770 1777 0 1770 1816 0 1770 1863 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 40
Link Distance (ft) 745 1359 938 991
Travel Time (s) 16.9 30.9 21.3 16.9
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 75 25 20 125 55 50 25 5 25 20 10
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 100 0 20 180 0 50 30 0 25 20 10 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 6th AWSC
1: 1st St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 75 25 20 125 55 50 25 5 25 20 10
Future Vol, veh/h 5 75 25 20 125 55 50 25 5 25 20 10
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 5 75 25 20 125 55 50 25 5 25 20 10
Number of Lanes 110110110111
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2232
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3222
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2322
HCM Control Delay 8.8 9.2 9 8.6

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 83% 0% 75% 0% 69% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 17% 0% 25% 0% 31% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 50 30 5 100 20 180 25 20 10
LT Vol 50 0 5 0 20 0 25 0 0
Through Vol 0 25 0 75 0 125 0 20 0
RT Vol 0 5 0 25 0 55 0 0 10
Lane Flow Rate 50 30 5 100 20 180 25 20 10
Geometry Grp 888888888
Degree of Util (X) 0.083 0.045 0.008 0.144 0.031 0.247 0.042 0.031 0.013 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.011 5.389 5.845 5.168 5.661 4.946 6.061 5.558 4.853 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 595 662 612 693 632 725 589 642 734
Service Time 3.761 3.14 3.586 2.909 3.397 2.681 3.816 3.312 2.608 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.084 0.045 0.008 0.144 0.032 0.248 0.042 0.031 0.014 HCM Control Delay 9.3 8.4 8.6 8.8 8.6 9.3 9.1 8.5 7.7
HCM Lane LOS AAAAAAAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.1 0 0.5 0.1 1 0.1 0.1 0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
2: 5th St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 10 75 5 15 145 45 5 45 25 15 20 15 Future Volume (vph) 10 75 5 15 145 45 5 45 25 15 20 15
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.992 0.970 0.955 0.850
Flt Protected 0.994 0.996 0.997 0.979
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1837 0 0 1800 0 0 1774 0 0 1824 1583 Flt Permitted 0.994 0.996 0.997 0.979
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1837 0 0 1800 0 0 1774 0 0 1824 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1359 918 1174 1074
Travel Time (s) 30.9 20.9 26.7 24.4
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 10 75 5 15 145 45 5 45 25 15 20 15
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 90 0 0 205 0 0 75 0 0 35 15
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 6th AWSC
2: 5th St & Marina Dr 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.3
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 75 5 15 145 45 5 45 25 15 20 15
Future Vol, veh/h 10 75 5 15 145 45 5 45 25 15 20 15
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 10 75 5 15 145 45 5 45 25 15 20 15
Number of Lanes 010010010011
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1121
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1211
HCM Control Delay 8 8.6 8.1 8.2

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 7% 11% 7% 43% 0%
Vol Thru, % 60% 83% 71% 57% 0%
Vol Right, % 33% 6% 22% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 75 90 205 35 15
LT Vol 5 10 15 15 0
Through Vol 45 75 145 20 0
RT Vol 25 5 45 0 15
Lane Flow Rate 75 90 205 35 15
Geometry Grp 52277
Degree of Util (X) 0.095 0.111 0.24 0.053 0.019
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.569 4.443 4.222 5.475 4.555
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 785 809 853 655 786
Service Time 2.592 2.459 2.235 3.199 2.279
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.096 0.111 0.24 0.053 0.019
HCM Control Delay 8.1 8 8.6 8.5 7.4
HCM Lane LOS AAAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.2 0.1
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 160 10 70 45 10 10 75 1015 20 1 15 920 Future Volume (vph) 160 10 70 45 10 10 75 1015 20 1 15 920 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 15 15 12 12 11 10 12 12 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 92 0 0 60 358 0 205
Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 60 25 75 75
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.869 0.850 0.997 0.985
Flt Protected 0.950 0.961 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1947 1753 0 0 1730 1478 1770 5067 0 0 1770 4994 Flt Permitted 0.718 0.738 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1466 1753 0 0 1324 1455 1770 5067 0 0 1770 4994 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 76 101 3 20
Link Speed (mph) 25 25 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 498 562 1142 537
Travel Time (s) 13.6 15.3 19.5 9.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 4 4 3 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 174 11 76 49 11 11 82 1103 22 1 16 1000 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 174 87 0 0 60 11 82 1125 0 0 17 1114 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right R NA Left Left Median Width(ft) 15 18 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 9 15
Number of Detectors 1 1 11111 111
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 00000 000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 00000 000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA
Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 5 2
Permitted Phases 8 4 4
Detector Phase 8 8 44416 552
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 6
Lane Group SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 105
Future Volume (vph) 105
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12
Storage Length (ft) 0
Storage Lanes 0
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor 0.91
Ped Bike Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0
Right Turn on Red Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 114
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No
Lane Alignment Right
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9
Number of Detectors
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft)
Trailing Detector (ft)
Detector 1 Position(ft)
Detector 1 Size(ft)
Detector 1 Type
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s)
Detector 1 Queue (s)
Detector 1 Delay (s)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 7
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 3.0 12.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 15.0 26.3 15.0 15.0 26.3 Total Split (s) 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 21.0 57.0 17.0 17.0 53.0 Total Split (%) 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% 17.5% 47.5% 14.2% 14.2% 44.2% Maximum Green (s) 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 17.5 51.7 13.5 13.5 47.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.3 3.0 3.0 4.3 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -1.3 0.0 -1.3
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 5.0 1.5 1.5 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 1.5 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max None None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 14.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 19.8 19.8 19.8 19.8 15.0 88.3 5.3 75.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.74 0.04 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.25 0.28 0.03 0.37 0.30 0.22 0.35
Control Delay 63.7 12.8 44.9 0.2 46.4 7.1 61.4 12.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 63.7 12.8 44.9 0.2 46.4 7.1 61.4 12.5

LOS E B D A D A E B
Approach Delay 46.7 38.0 9.8 13.3
Approach LOS D D A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 73 (61%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT and 6:NBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72
Intersection Signal Delay: 15.6 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Seal Beach Blvd & Bradbury Rd 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 8
Lane Group SBR
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Maximum Green (s)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s)
Minimum Gap (s)
Time Before Reduce (s)
Time To Reduce (s)
Recall Mode
Walk Time (s)
Flash Dont Walk (s)
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr)
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 9
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 85 5 155 60 15 120 35 1015 5 9 5 930 Future Volume (vph) 85 5 155 60 15 120 35 1015 5 9 5 930 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 8 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 80 0 0 0 80 60 150
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 100 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.95
Frt 0.854 0.866 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1564 0 1770 1595 0 1770 5085 1372 0 1770 5085 Flt Permitted 0.444 0.355 0.950 0.851
Satd. Flow (perm) 827 1564 0 659 1595 0 1770 5085 1308 0 1585 5085 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 168 130 52
Link Speed (mph) 25 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 538 406 892 1142
Travel Time (s) 14.7 9.2 15.2 19.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 92 5 168 65 16 130 38 1103 5 10 5 1011
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 92 173 0 65 146 0 38 1103 5 0 15 1011 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right R NA Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 16 16
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 9 15
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 111111
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 000000
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 000000
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Perm custom Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 1
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 522116
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 10
Lane Group SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 35
Future Volume (vph) 35
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Lane Width (ft) 8
Storage Length (ft) 150
Storage Lanes 1
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.96
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 1372
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 1314
Right Turn on Red Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 61
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 38
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 38
Enter Blocked Intersection No
Lane Alignment Right
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.20
Turning Speed (mph) 9
Number of Detectors 1
Detector Template Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0
Turn Type Perm
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase 6
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 11
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 36.2 36.2 15.0 15.0 15.0 17.5 17.5 15.0 15.0 18.5 Total Split (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 69.0 69.0 15.0 15.0 68.0 Total Split (%) 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 13.3% 57.5% 57.5% 12.5% 12.5% 56.7% Maximum Green (s) 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 11.5 63.5 63.5 10.5 10.5 62.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.5 -1.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max C-Max None None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 25.0 25.0 5.0 5.0 6.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 9.5 90.4 90.4 8.0 86.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.75 0.75 0.07 0.72 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.49 0.76 0.45 0.27 0.29 0.01 0.14 0.28
Control Delay 104.5 12.1 95.8 14.5 39.1 0.9 0.0 79.3 2.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 104.5 12.1 95.8 14.5 39.1 0.9 0.0 79.3 2.9

LOS F B F B D A A E A
Approach Delay 44.2 39.6 2.2 3.9
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 83 (69%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86
Intersection Signal Delay: 9.9 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Seal Beach Blvd & Rossmoor Center Wy 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 12
Lane Group SBR
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0
Minimum Split (s) 18.5
Total Split (s) 68.0
Total Split (%) 56.7%
Maximum Green (s) 62.5
Yellow Time (s) 4.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.5
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0
Recall Mode C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 6.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 86.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72
v/c Ratio 0.04
Control Delay 0.2
Queue Delay 0.0
Total Delay 0.2
LOS A
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
5: Seal Beach Blvd & Towne Center Dr 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 13
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 5 20 45 5 15 30 1080 40 15 865 15 Future Volume (vph) 5 5 20 45 5 15 30 1080 40 15 865 15 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 75 0 179 0 170 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 110 130
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.878 0.886 0.995 0.997
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1635 0 1770 1623 0 1770 5055 0 1770 5067 0 Flt Permitted 0.744 0.740 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1373 1635 0 1378 1623 0 1770 5055 0 1770 5067 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 22 16 7 3
Link Speed (mph) 15 15 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 340 303 598 892
Travel Time (s) 15.5 13.8 10.2 15.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 2 12
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 5 22 49 5 16 33 1174 43 16 940 16
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 27 0 49 21 0 33 1217 0 16 956 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
5: Seal Beach Blvd & Towne Center Dr 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 14
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 10.0
Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 34.0 34.0 15.0 22.5 15.0 22.5 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 17.0 65.0 20.0 68.0 Total Split (%) 29.2% 29.2% 29.2% 29.2% 14.2% 54.2% 16.7% 56.7% Maximum Green (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 12.5 59.5 15.5 62.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 23.0 23.0 10.0 10.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 7.3 100.5 6.2 97.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.84 0.05 0.81 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.18 0.45 0.14 0.31 0.29 0.18 0.23
Control Delay 49.4 24.9 64.0 27.3 68.3 0.7 63.3 2.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 49.4 24.9 64.0 27.3 68.3 0.7 63.3 2.0

LOS D C E C E A E A
Approach Delay 28.7 53.0 2.5 3.1
Approach LOS C D A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 87 (73%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.45
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.6 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 5: Seal Beach Blvd & Towne Center Dr Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 15
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 110 0 665 55 10 0 380 1415 65 5 1220 45 Future Volume (vph) 110 0 665 55 10 0 380 1415 65 5 1220 45 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 107 0 0 0 206 0 78 0
Storage Lanes 1 2 1 0 2 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 40 25 120 110
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.993 0.995
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.965 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 2787 1681 1708 0 3433 5044 0 1770 5057 0 Flt Permitted 0.730 0.950 0.965 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1352 0 2787 1681 1708 0 3433 5044 0 1770 5057 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 300 7 5
Link Speed (mph) 25 15 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 526 300 909 598
Travel Time (s) 14.3 13.6 15.5 10.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 1 1 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 52
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 120 0 723 60 11 0 413 1538 71 5 1326 49 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 49%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 120 0 723 31 40 0 413 1609 0 5 1375 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm pm+ov Split NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 5 3 3 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4
Detector Phase 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 16
Lane Group Ø8
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor
Ped Bike Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Adj. Flow (vph)
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Enter Blocked Intersection
Lane Alignment
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor
Turning Speed (mph)
Number of Detectors
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft)
Trailing Detector (ft)
Detector 1 Position(ft)
Detector 1 Size(ft)
Detector 1 Type
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s)
Detector 1 Queue (s)
Detector 1 Delay (s)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 8
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Seal Beach Blvd & St. Cloud Dr 05/29/2025
Future AM Seal Beach Boulevard TSSP 1:10 pm 03/12/2025 Future Conditions Synchro 11 Report Iteris, Inc. Page 17
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 22.5 15.0 28.5 Total Split (s) 27.0 24.0 20.0 20.0 24.0 58.0 15.0 49.0 Total Split (%) 22.5% 20.0% 16.7% 16.7% 20.0% 48.3% 12.5% 40.8% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 19.5 16.0 16.0 19.5 52.5 10.5 43.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 10.0 16.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 20.5 42.9 9.2 9.2 18.4 78.3 5.5 58.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.36 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.65 0.05 0.48 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.61 0.24 0.31 0.79 0.49 0.06 0.56
Control Delay 52.5 19.2 55.7 57.6 66.0 6.2 62.8 20.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 52.5 19.2 55.7 57.6 66.0 6.2 62.8 20.4