A G E N D A
CITY OF SEASIDE REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR 440 HARCOURT AVE (COUNCIL CHAMBER) AGENCY TO THE Thursday, February 16, 2023
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5:00 PM
___________________________________________________________________________________ NOTICE: The City Council will hold its public meetings in person, with a virtual option for public participation based on availability. The City of Seaside utilizes Zoom tele-conferencing technology for virtual public participation; however, we make no representation or warranty of any kind, regarding the adequacy, reliability, or availability of the use of this platform in this manner. Participation by members of public through this means is at their own risk. ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________
VIRTUAL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INSTRUCTIONS
1. To view this meeting: Please click on the following link to the City of Seaside YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofSeasideCalifornia
2. To participate in this meeting: Using the Zoom application on your smart phone, laptop, tablet or desktop and click on this link: https://ci-seaside-ca-us.zoom.us/j/81936832059 WEBINAR ID: 819 3683 2059
3. To participate by phone: Please call (669) 900-9128
Enter the meeting ID 819 3683 2059 when prompted. There is no participate code – press the pound sign # after the recording prompts you.
4. To make public comment, the following options are available:
Before the Meeting via Email: Written comments can be emailed to [email protected] Include the following subject line: “Public Comment Item #___” (insert the agenda item number relevant to your comment). Written comments must be received by 2:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting.
During the Meeting via Oral Comments: When the Chair calls for public comment, attendees can queue to speak with the “Raise Hand” feature. On the Zoom application, click the “Raise Hand” button. On the phone, press *9.
IN PERSON PARTICIPATION INSTRUCTIONS
Members of the public participating in person and wishing to address the City Council may approach the podium when the Chair calls for public comment.
Packet Page 1
City Council REGULAR Meeting February 16, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 2
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL – ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM
Ian N. Oglesby
David R. Pacheco
Alexis Garcia-Arrazola
Rita Burks
Alex Miller
Mayor/Chair
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair
Council/Agency Member
Council/Agency Member
Council/Agency Member
3. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. REVIEW OF AGENDA
If there are any items that arose after the 72-hour posting deadline, this is the point in the meeting where a vote may be taken to add the item to the agenda. (A 2/3-majority vote is required).
5. PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on matters within the jurisdiction of the City of Seaside, but not on this agenda, may do so during the Public Comment period for up to three (3) minutes. Public Comments for "Presentations" on this agenda are also taken at this time; comments on specific agenda items are heard under that item. For the public record, please state your name.
6. PUBLIC AGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
This is a time specifically set aside for representatives of public agencies to make brief comments of general interest to the City Council and the community.
A. DANIELLE PATTERSON, HEAD OF SCHOOL AT CHARTWELL SCHOOL B. BARBARA NITIS, PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, U.S. SMALL BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION - OFFICE OF DISASTER RECOVERY AND RESILIENCE
7. PRESENTATIONS
A. PRESENTATION RECOGNIZING THE FIRST WALK OF FAME AD-HOC
COMMITTEE (ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ASHLEY COLLICK)
B. PRESENT PROCLAMATION ACKNOWLEDGING FIREFIGHTER JOSH
SISNEROS AS 2022 FIREFIGHTER OF THE YEAR AND KENDALL EMERICK AS 2022 RESERVE FIREFIGHTER OF THE YEAR (FIRE CHIEF MARY
GUTIERREZ)
Packet Page 2
City Council REGULAR Meeting February 16, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 3 C. PRESENT PROCLAMATION ACKNOWLEDGING DAVID DILLON AS 2022 POLICE OFFICER OF THE YEAR, AND CURTIS OLIVARES AS 2022
COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES PERSONNEL OF THE YEAR (POLICE
CHIEF NICHOLAS BORGES)
D. POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL CRIME REPORT (POLICE CHIEF
NICHOLAS BORGES)
E. RECEIVE PRESENTATION REGARDING REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS TO
THE CONCEPUTAL FIRE STATION MURAL DESIGNED BY LA NETA MURALS (RECREATION SUPERVISOR KEE HYON HIGGINS)
F. UPCOMING CITYWIDE EVENTS AND COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS (ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ASHLEY COLLICK)
G. REVIEW OF THE CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES ESTABLISHED ON NOVEMBER 21, 2022, STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT, AND THE 2023- 2025 STRATEGIC PLAN (CITY CLERK DOMINIQUE DAVIS)
8. CONSENT AGENDA
A. APPROVE MINUTES FROM JANUARY 30, 2023 SPECIAL MEETING RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes as presented in the agenda packet.
B. APPROVE PROCLAMATION CELEBRATING MARCH AS WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH
RECOMMENDATION: Approve a proclamation declaring March as Women's History Month.
C. APPROVE PROCLAMATION CELEBRATING MARCH AS IRISH AMERICAN
HERITAGE MONTH
RECOMMENDATION: Approve a proclamation declaring March as Irish American Heritage Month.
D. APPROVE MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST OF
$3,000.00 FROM THE SEASIDE HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS BASKETBALL
PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION: Approve a request from Seaside High School Girls Basketball Program for a donation of $3,000.00 from the Mayor's Youth Fund for the costs associated with purchasing equipment, facility upgrades, tournaments, and travel expenses.
E. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE Packet Page 3
City Council REGULAR Meeting February 16, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 4
AGREEMENT WITH WALLACE GROUP FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE CUTINO PARK IMPROVEMENTS PART 2 PHASE 1 PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $189,914.00 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Wallace Group to perform construction management and inspection services for the Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 Project for an amount not to exceed $189,914.00.
F. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY
OF MONTEREY TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION SUPPORT SERVICES TO THE
ARMY WITHIN SEASIDE CITY LIMITS, AND AUTHORIZING THE
WITHDRAWAL FROM AND TERMINATION OF THE PRESIDIO PUBLIC
WORKS AGENCY
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the City of Monterey to provide support services to the Army, and authorizing the withdrawal from and termination of the Presidio Public Works Agency, also known as the Presidio Municipal Services Agency.
G. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A MAINTENANCE SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH HOPE SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $137,046.00
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with HOPE Services to assist with maintenance in City parks and public areas for an amount not to exceed $137,046.00.
H. ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT FOR FERNANDO PARK FROM FRIENDS OF SEASIDE PARKS;
AMENDING THE CAPITAL PROGRAM TO INCLUDE THE FERNANDO PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; APPROPRIATING A BUDGET OF $80,000.00 TO THE PROJECT FROM GENERAL FUND; AND AUTHORIZING A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WHITSON ENGINEERS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $42,770.00 FOR THE PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution: accepting a donation for playground equipment at Fernando Park from Friends of Seaside Parks; amending the Capital Program to include the Fernando Park Improvement Project; appropriating $80,000.00 for design and construction of the project from the General Fund; and authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Whitson Engineers for an amount not to exceed $42,770.00 to provide design and construction support services for the project.
I. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS INDUCTING COLONEL ALFRED P. GLOVER, SR, DR.
BETTYE J. LUSK, MAYOR JERRY SMITH (POSTHUMOUSLY), CARLOS
RAMOS (POSTHUMOUSLY), RUTHIE WATTS AND HELEN RUCKER INTO
THE BROADWAY AVE WALK OF FAME
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolutions inducting the 2022 class of Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame honorees.
Packet Page 4
City Council REGULAR Meeting February 16, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 5
9. PUBLIC HEARING
A. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PART-TIME (REGULAR, TEMPORARY, AND SEASONAL) DEFINITION AND
CLASSIFICATION TO MONITOR THE ALLOWED NUMBER OF HOURS
WORKED PER FISCAL YEAR (FIRST READING - ROLL CALL VOTE) RECOMMENDATION: First reading of an ordinance on defining part-time classifications (regular and temporary/seasonal part-time) and maximum hours worked, per fiscal year.
B. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE SEASIDE MUNICIPAL CODE MODIFYING SECTION
17.52.230 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS) TO IMPLEMENT RECENT
HOUSING BILLS - THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
DOES NOT APPLY (FIRST READING - ROLL CALL VOTE)
RECOMMENDATION: First reading of an ordinance amending title 17 (Zoning Ordinance of the Seaside Municipal Code modifying Section 17.52.230 (Accessory Dwelling Units) to implement recent housing bills. CEQA does not apply pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17.
10. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. APPROVE AND ACCEPT A BID NOT TO EXCEED $105,650.00 (YEAR 1) TO
PURCHASE FLOCK SAFETY LICENSE PLATE READER CAMERAS AND SHOT DETECTION WITH AN ANNUAL RENEWAL COST OF $90,000.00 AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A TWO-YEAR RENEWAL
AGREEMENT WITH FLOCK SAFETY
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution to approve the purchase of Flock Safety License Plate Reader cameras and shot detection, not to exceed $105,650.00 and authorize the City Manager to enter into a two-year renewal agreement to maintain the program, not to exceed $90,000.00 (annually).
B. RECEIVE UPDATE ON THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT, AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 5 YEAR PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION POLICY AND STREET LIST FOR THE FY 2022/23
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION: Receive the 2022 Pavement Management Program Final Report, and adopt a resolution approving a 5 Year Pavement Rehabilitation Policy and approve a street list for the FY 2022/23 Pavement Rehabilitation Project.
C. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WALLACE GROUP TO
EVALUATE ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS IN THE WELL SITING STUDY FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $94,046.00
Packet Page 5
City Council REGULAR Meeting February 16, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 6 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the professional services agreement with Wallace Group to evaluate additional locations in the well siting study for an amount not to exceed $94,046.00
D. CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING OR DENYING
CONSENT TO THE CITY OF MONTEREY TO RENEW THE MONTEREY
COUNTY TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (MCTID) AND INCLUDE THE
CITY OF SEASIDE IN THE MCTID
RECOMMENDATION: Consider adoption of a resolution granting or denying consent to the City of Monterey to renew the MCTID, and include the City of Seaside in the MCTID.
11. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
A. NEW COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
B. FOLLOW UP ON PREVIOUS COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
1. Explore options for vacant buildings in the downtown area on Broadway Avenue; and 2. Discuss the option of establishing a new City Commission (Miller)
12. CITY ATTORNEY, CITY MANAGER, CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR
COMMENTS AND REPORTS ON COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
This is a time specifically set aside for members of the City Council, the City Manager and City Attorney to make brief comments of general interest to the community and report on committee assignments.
13. CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 et seq., the City Council and Successor Agency to Redevelopment Agency may adjourn to a Closed Session to consider specific matters dealing with litigation, certain personnel matters, property negotiations or to confer with the City Attorney. Public comments on these items are taken after being read by the City Attorney. For the public record, please state your name.
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 - EXISTING LITIGATION
Committee for Sound Water and Land v. City of Seaside, et al.
Monterey County Superior Court
Case No. 20CV002326
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9
Potential Litigation (2 Matters)
14. ADJOURNMENT
Packet Page 6
City Council REGULAR Meeting February 16, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 7 Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting:
March 2, 2023
5:00 PM
The City of Seaside is committed to providing accessible facilities and accommodating people with disabilities in all of its services programs and activities. If special considerations are needed by any person to fully participate in this meeting, contact the City Clerk at 899-6707 no fewer than two business days prior to the meeting to allow reasonable arrangements. Agendas are posted at:
http://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/129/City-Council-Committee-Agendas Agenda-related writings or documents provided during public meetings are available for public inspection during the meeting or from the office of the City Clerk. This agenda is posted in compliance with California Governor Newsom's Executive Orders N-29-20 and N-33-20.
Packet Page 7
City of Seaside
PROCLAMATION
Josh Sisneros
Firefighter of the Year 2022 Nomination
WHEREAS, Fire Engineer Josh Sisneros is being honored today for his nomination for the Firefighter of the Year award; and
WHEREAS, the Firefighter of the Year award is presented to Firefighters who exhibit actions and traits that go above and beyond the day-to-day duties; and WHEREAS, the Seaside Fire Department takes pride in serving their diverse community through outreach, professional services and efficient response; and
WHEREAS, Fire Engineer Sisneros is a role model to Full-time, Probationary and Reserve Firefighters; and
WHEREAS, Fire Engineer Sisneros can be counted on to come back to the fire station during Emergency Call-Back of fire personnel; and WHEREAS, Fire Engineer Sisneros’ knowledge of building construction has added value to the design and efficiency of a Fire Department kitchen remodel project; and
WHEREAS, Fire Engineer Sisneros dedicates his heart and soul to ensuring the department has a functional fitness gym at the fire station, and at the Oldemeyer Center during the pandemic, so members of the fire department can continue to maintain the highest level of fitness to serve the community; and WHEREAS, Fire Engineer Sisneros always conducts himself with professionalism and pride. Fire Engineer Sisneros maintains an incredibly authentic and humble attitude. The Fire Department feels Fire Engineer Sisneros is the definition of what the title of Seaside Firefighter of the Year entails.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N.
Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize and congratulate Josh Sisneros on his many accomplishments, including his nomination for the Firefighter of the Year award.
_____________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
February 16, 2023
Packet Page 8
City of Seaside
PROCLAMATION
KENDALL EMERICK
Reserve Firefighter of the Year 2022 Nomination
WHEREAS, Reserve Firefighter Kendall Emerick is being honored today for her nomination for the Reserve Firefighter of the Year award; and WHEREAS, the Seaside Fire Department takes pride in serving their diverse community through volunteerism, outreach, professional services and a servants spirit; and
WHEREAS, Reserve Firefighter Emerick is an incredible asset to the fire department and City of Seaside; and
WHEREAS, Reserve Firefighter Emerick can be counted on to serve the community by volunteering for every community event hosted by the fire department; and
WHEREAS, Reserve Firefighter Emerick volunteered for 12 City-sponsored Covid 19 vaccine clinics, the September 11 Memorial Event, the Fire Department’s annual public education open house, the Oaxaca Sister City Festival, the Seaside Fire Department Badge Pinning and Cal Fire’s community education “zombie run”; and WHEREAS, Reserve Firefighter Emerick committed 204 hours of volunteer time in the past nine months, that included community events, fire department training and fire department ride-along; and
WHEREAS, Reserve Firefighter Emerick has a dream of becoming a full time firefighter, and has shown her commitment to being a selfless servant through her dedication, volunteerism, and hard work; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N.
Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize and congratulate Kendall Emerick on her many accomplishments, including her nomination for the Reserve Firefighter of the Year award. _____________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
February 16, 2023
Packet Page 9
City of Seaside
PROCLAMATION
David Dillon
Police Officer of the Year 2022
WHEREAS, K9 Officer Dillon is being honored today and recognized today for the Police Officer of the Year award; and
WHEREAS, the Police Officer of the Year award is presented to Police Officers who exhibit actions and traits that go above and beyond the day-to-day duties; and
WHEREAS, with gun violence on the rise nationally, K9 Officer Dillon led the charge in targeting gang violence, gun violence and unlawful gun possessions; and WHEREAS, K9 Officer Dillon led the police department in driving under the influence arrests and interventions; and
WHEREAS, K9 Officer Dillon has mentored new officers on the professionalism of police work and the importance of a united community; and WHEREAS, K9 Officer Dillon always conducts himself with professionalism and pride. K9 Officer Dillon maintains an incredibly authentic and humble attitude.
The Police Department feels K9 Officer Dillon is the definition of what the title of Seaside Police Officer of the Year entails.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N.
Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize and congratulate David Dillon on his many accomplishments, including his recognition for the Police Officer of the Year award. _____________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
February 16, 2023
Packet Page 10
City of Seaside
PROCLAMATION
Curtis Olivares
Support Services of the Year 2022
WHEREAS, Community Resource Specialist (CRS) Curtis Olivares is being honored today and recognized today for the Support Services of the Year award; and WHEREAS, the Support Services of the Year award is presented to staff who exhibit actions and traits that go above and beyond the day-to-day duties; and WHEREAS, CRS Olivares set a strong example of professionalism, positivity and respect for our community and staff; and
WHEREAS, CRS Olivares has led the charge in developing a newly formed mentor program to support and guide at-risk youth; and
WHEREAS, CRS Olivares has worked diligently on bridging the gap between police and youth engagement at our schools; and
WHEREAS, CRS Olivares always conducts himself with professionalism and pride. CRS Olivares maintains an incredibly authentic and humble attitude. The Police Department feels CRS Olivares is the definition of what the title of Seaside Police Support Services of the Year entails.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N.
Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize and congratulate Curtis Olivares on his many accomplishments, including his recognition for the Police Officer of the Year award. _____________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
February 16, 2023
Packet Page 11
DRAFT MINUTES
CITY OF SEASIDE SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR 440 HARCOURT AVE
AGENCY TO THE Monday, January 30, 2023
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor/Chair Oglesby called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL – ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM
PRESENT: Burks, Garcia-Arrazola, Miller, Oglesby, Pacheco ABSENT: None
3. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
A moment of silence was held and the pledge of allegiance was led by Council/Agency Member Garcia-Arrazola.
4. REVIEW OF AGENDA
No changes.
5. PUBLIC COMMENT
Anne Marie Pagan, Peter Kaiser, Pastor Kenneth Murray
6. PUBLIC AGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
None.
7. PRESENTATIONS
A. UPCOMING CITYWIDE EVENTS (ASHLEY COLLICK, ASSISTANT CITY
MANAGER)
Ms. Collick presented the upcoming citywide and community announcements. There were no questions from the Council.
B. HUMAN RESOURCES UPDATE (SAMANTHA SAKHRANI, HUMAN
RESOURCES ANALYST)
Ms. Sakhrani presented the human resources update and responded to questions from the Council.
C. VACCINATION UPDATE (MARY GUTIERREZ, FIRE CHIEF)
Chief Gutierrez presented the vaccine update. There were no questions from the Council.
Packet Page 12
Monday, January 30, 2023 City Council SPECIAL Meeting Page 2
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor/Chair Oglesby read the Consent Agenda items. There were no comments from the public.
On motion by Council/Agency Member Miller and second by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Member Pacheco, and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency moved to approve the consent agenda as presented.
RESULT: 5-0-0-0
AYES: Burks, Garcia-Arrazola, Miller, Oglesby, Pacheco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
A. APPROVE MINUTES FROM JANUARY 19, 2023
ACTION: Approved
B. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A BUDGET TRANSFER OF
$30,000.00 FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION
BUDGET TO THE HIGHLAND OTIS PARK PROJECT
ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-18
C. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PHASE 3 OF THE
ENCLAVE
ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-19
D. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE
AGREEMENT WITH MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT
ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-20
E. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS FOR THE FUNDING REQUESTS OF MEALS ON WHEELS FOR $50,000.00, BUILDING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES FOR $100,000.00, AND SNIP BUS FOR $10,000.00
ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-21, 23-22, and 23-23
F. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT #2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT WITH KIMLEY-HORN TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CAMPUS
TOWN PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES THROUGH JANUARY 30, 2024 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $455,200.00 TO BE REIMBURSED BY
DEVELOPER OR PAID FOR OUT OF FORA DEMOLITION BONDS
ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-24
Packet Page 13
Monday, January 30, 2023 City Council SPECIAL Meeting Page 3 G. ADOPT A RESOLUTION CREATING THE PART-TIME CLASSIFICATION OF
COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT SPECIALIST FOR THE BUILDING AND
CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT AND APPROVE PROPOSED SALARY ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-25
H. APPROVE A FEE WAIVER FROM THE VILLAGE PROJECT INC FOR THE USE OF THE LAGUNA GRANDE HALL AND KITCHEN FOR THEIR MAE C.
JOHNSON EDUCATION & CULTURAL ENRICHMENT ACADEMY
CELEBRATION OF EXCELLENCE EVENT ON MAY 19, 2023
ACTION: Approved
I. APPROVE MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST OF
$3,000.00 FROM THE SEASIDE HIGH SCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL
PROGRAM
ACTION: Approved
J. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO MODIFY THE POSITION CONTROL LIST FOR
POLICE AND CITY MANAGER TO ADD THREE ADDITIONAL POLICE
OFFERS, DELETE TWO POLICE CORPORALS, CHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE
ANALYST II TO ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I, ADD ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AND DELETE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER -
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-26
K. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ROAD CLOSURE OF BROADWAY
AVENUE FROM HILLSDALE STREET TO ALHAMBRA STREET FOR THE
BROADWAY WALK OF FAME UNVEILING & RIBBON CUTTING
CEREMONY
ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-27
9. BUSINESS ITEMS
Council Member Garcia-Arrazola announced that he would be departing the Council meeting early to attend his local committee assignment as a Board Member for Monterey 1 Water at 6:00 p.m.
A. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER
INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH
CONSERVATION TECHNIX TO PREPARE THE PARKS MASTER PLAN FOR A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $130,880.00
Recreation Director Dan Meewis provided the presentation and introduced Steve Duh with Conservation Technix. Mr. Meewis and Mr. Duh responded to questions from the Council.
Packet Page 14
Monday, January 30, 2023 City Council SPECIAL Meeting Page 4 PUBLIC COMMENT: Donna Pinwell, Laura Murphy, Robert Daniels, Peter Kaiser, Diane Nielson, Emily Howard, Catherine Crockett
On motion by Council/Agency Member Miller and second by Council/Agency Member Burks and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency moved to authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement for professional services with Conservation Technix to prepare the Parks Master Plan.
AYES: Burks, Miller, Oglesby, Pacheco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Garcia-Arrazola
ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-28
B. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH WHITSON ENGINEERS FOR PREPARATION OF
CONCEPT PLANS FOR LINCOLN CUNNINGHAM AND HAVANA SOLIZ
PARKS PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $66,000.00
Public Works Director/City Engineer Nisha Patel provided the presentation and responded to questions from the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Jenny Reeves, Diane Nielson, Robert Daniels, Emily Howard, Tanya Roos, Donna Pinwell, Cathy Ribera, Karla Lobo
On motion by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Pacheco and second by Council/Agency Member Burks and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency moved to authorize a professional services agreement with Whitson Engineers for preparation of concept plans for the Lincoln Cunningham and Havana Soliz Parks Project for an amount not to exceed $66,000.00.
AYES: Burks, Miller, Oglesby, Pacheco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Garcia-Arrazola
ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-29
Recess 7:06 p.m - 7:23 p.m.
C. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A BUDGET AMENDMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $66,908.00 FOR THE LINCOLN CUNNINGHAM PARK
BASKETBALL COURT PROJECT FOR A TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET OF
$316,908.00 AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $12,000.00
Packet Page 15
Monday, January 30, 2023 City Council SPECIAL Meeting Page 5 Public Works Director/City Engineer Nisha Patel provided the presentation and responded to questions from the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Justin Stokes, Diane Nielson, Laura Murphy, Robert Daniels, Karla Lobo, Franco Pacheco
On motion by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Pacheco and second by Council/Agency Member Miller and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency moved to authorize a budget amendment in the amount of $66,908.00 for the Lincoln Cunningham Park Basketball Court Project for a total project budget of $316,908.00, and an amendment to the professional services agreement with BFS Landscape Architects in amount not to exceed $12,000.00.
AYES: Burks, Garcia-Arrazola, Miller, Oglesby, Pacheco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
ACTION: Adopted Reso #23-30
D. RECEIVE AND APPROVE IMMEDIATE TRAFFIC CALMING AND
MITIGATION MEASURES ON HILBY AVENUE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
MANAGER TO APPROVE CHANGES AND UPDATES TO MITIGATION
MEASURES AS NEEDED
Police Chief Nicholas Borges provided the presentation and responded to questions from the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Karla Lobo
On motion by Council/Agency Member Burks and second by Council/Agency Member Miller and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency moved to approve immediate solutions to promote traffic calming measures on Hilby Avenue.
AYES: Burks, Miller, Oglesby, Pacheco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Garcia-Arrazola
ACTION: Approved
10. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
A. NEW COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
Council/Agency member Miller asked for consideration on establishing a new City commission and considering ways to improve downtown Seaside on Broadway Ave.
Packet Page 16
Monday, January 30, 2023 City Council SPECIAL Meeting Page 6 B. FOLLOW UP ON PREVIOUS COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
City Manager advised he is still working to provide a follow up to the housing request.
11. CITY ATTORNEY, CITY MANAGER, CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR COMMENTS
AND REPORTS ON COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
The City Attorney, City Manager, Council Members Burks and Miller, did not have any items to report.
Mayor Pro Tem provided updates on the Ellis ribbon cutting ceremony, the Monterey Peninsula School Board Meeting, and the Seaside High School basketball recreation meeting.
Mayor Oglesby responded to Mayor Pro Tem on the City’s parks. The Mayor provided updates on the homeless, LAFCO, and MPWMD meetings, as well as the Monterey County Chamber of Commerce dinner and the Veteran’s Advisory Meeting.
12. CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Sheri Damon read the Closed Session items. There were no comments from the public.
A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
PROPERTY: Approximately 5 Acres located on APN 031-151-013 generally located along Divarty and Second Avenue
AGENCY NEGOTIATOR: City Manager, City Attorney, et al.
NEGOTIATING PARTIES: Judicial Council of the State of California UNDER NEGOTIATION: Price, Terms of Payment, or Both
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: EXISTING LITIGATION
Committee for Sound Water and Land Development v. City of Seaside, et al.
Monterey County Superior Court
Case No. 20CV002326
C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 EXISTING LITIGATION
Case Name: John Doe PD v. City of Seaside, et al.
Monterey County Superior Court
Case No. 22CV003790
D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
Potential Litigation (2 Matters)
Packet Page 17
Monday, January 30, 2023 City Council SPECIAL Meeting Page 7 City Attorney Sheri Damon read the Closed Session items and advised the Council authorized the filing of a lawsuit on a code enforcement case.
13. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:27 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________ _________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
Packet Page 18
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.B.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Dominique Davis, City Clerk
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE PROCLAMATION CELEBRATING MARCH AS WOMEN'S
HISTORY MONTH
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a proclamation declaring March as Women's History Month.
BACKGROUND
Women's History Month is observed in March to commemorate, encourage the study, observance and celebration of the vital role of women in American history. Women's History Month had its origins as a national celebration in 1981 when Congress passed Pub. L. 97-28, which authorized and requested the President to proclaim the week beginning March 7, 1982, as "Women's History Week". Over the following five years, Congress continued to pass joint resolutions designating a week in March as "Women's History Week". In 1987, the National Women's History Project petitioned to admonish Congress to pass Pub L. 100-9, to designate the month of March 1987 as Women's History Month.
On July 1, 2021, the City Council adopted resolution 21-60, establishing a commemorative observances and flag policy, which included the observance of Women's History Month in March for the City of Seaside.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Women's History Month Proclamation
Packet Page 19
Item No. 8.B. Page 2 of 2
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 20
City of Seaside
PROCLAMATION
Women’s History Month
March 2023
WHEREAS, Seaside women of every race, class and ethnic background have made historic contributions to the growth and strength of our City, County, and State in countless recorded and unrecorded way; and
WHEREAS, Seaside women have played and continue to play critical political, economic, cultural, religious, and social roles in every sphere of the life of the City by their work and volunteer service, including serving as Seaside elected official including Mayor Pro Tem Helen Rucker, Councilwomen Pearl Carey, Nancy Amos, Ira Lively, Kayla Jones, Alissa Kispersky and Rita Burks; and
WHEREAS, many Seaside women have served our community as educators, working in the schools, colleges, and universities of our community; and WHEREAS, Seaside women were particularly important in the establishment of charitable, philanthropic, religious, cultural, health, and social support organizations; and WHEREAS, Seaside women of every race, class, and ethnic background contributed and served as leaders in bringing about social change and improvement within and without the City, often in volunteer service; and
WHEREAS, many Seaside women have served our country courageously in the military in direct service and/or as wives of military officers and personnel; and WHEREAS, Seaside women have been leaders, not only in securing their own rights to equal opportunity, but also in the civil rights and peace movements, which create a more fair and just society for all.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that I, The Honorable Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize the women and all members of the community who work and serve to make Seaside an inclusive and supportive community for all, known for its historic legacy and on-going contributions to our overall quality of life and hereby do proclaim the month of March 2023, in the City of Seaside as Women’s History Month. ____________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
February 16, 2023
Packet Page 21
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.C.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Dominique Davis, City Clerk
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE PROCLAMATION CELEBRATING MARCH AS IRISH
AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a proclamation declaring March as Irish American Heritage Month.
BACKGROUND
In 1991, President George H.W. Bush issued the first proclamation designating March as Irish-American Heritage Month. Congress followed with action in 1992, by passing Public Law 102-253, which designated March of that year as Irish-American Heritage Month. Since 1997, presidents have issued annual proclamations for the observance and celebration of Irish-American Month. Originally a religious holiday to honor St.
Patrick, has evolved into a celebration of all things Irish.
On July 1, 2021, the City Council adopted resolution 21-60, establishing a commemorative observances and flag policy, which included the observance of IrishAmerican Heritage Month in the City of Seaside.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Irish-American Heritage Month Proclamation
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
Packet Page 22
Item No. 8.C. Page 2 of 2
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 23
City of Seaside
PROCLAMATION
Irish-American Heritage Month 2023
Commemorative Observance
WHEREAS, Irish-American Heritage Month is celebrated by proclamation of the President and Congress in the United States to honor the achievements and contributions of Irish immigrants and their descendants living in the United States; and WHEREAS, Irish-American Heritage Month was first celebrated in 1991; and WHEREAS, Irish-American descendants have greatly influenced all aspects of life, including education, the arts, public safety, firefighting, the military, science, agriculture, business, industry, athletics, and public service, including the presidency; and
WHEREAS, the month of March provides many excellent opportunities to acknowledge the outstanding achievements of our thriving Irish-American community; and
WHEREAS, The City of Seaside will observe Irish-American Heritage Month by flying a commemorative flag from March 1
st
and March 31
st
at City Hall; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N.
Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim March 2023 as Irish-American Heritage Month.
_________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
February 16, 2023
Packet Page 24
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.D.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Dan Meewis, Recreation Director
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST OF $3,000.00 FROM THE SEASIDE HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS
BASKETBALL PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a request from Seaside High School Girls Basketball Program for a donation of $3,000.00 from the Mayor's Youth Fund for the costs associated with purchasing equipment, facility upgrades, tournaments, and travel expenses.
BACKGROUND
The Seaside High School Girls Basketball Program is requesting a donation of $3000.00 from the Mayor's Youth Fund to cover the costs associated with purchasing equipment, facility upgrades, tournaments, and expenses. The Seaside High School Girls Basketball Program strives to provide an opportunity for young female athletes to experience the joys and challenges of competitive basketball in a supportive and encouraging atmosphere. The program encourages teamwork, self-discipline, sportsmanship, and works to develop players' technical and tactical basketball skills, as well as physical and mental conditioning. The coaching staff provides individualized instruction and mentorship to help players maximize their potential. The equipment supports the goals of recycling, cleanup, and sustainability, as it allows them to reuse items in various activities and reduce their environmental footprint.
Based on the information provided, staff has determined that the application meets the requirements of the Mayor's Youth Fund Policy. The Seaside High School Girls Basketball Program received their last donation at the November 01, 2018, City Council meeting. They submitted their 2018 Mayor's Youth Fund Closing Report within the 60 day time frame.
Packet Page 25
Item No. 8.D. Page 2 of 2
FISCAL IMPACT
This request would be funded by a donation from the Green Waste Recovery's donation to the Mayor's Youth Fund. The current balance is the Mayor's Youth Fund account (601-2106) is $47,349.43. If the City Council approves this request, the balance will decrease to $44,349.43. This is for fiscal year 2022/23.
In the event that all of the funds in the Mayor's Youth Fund become exhausted, staff will keep a file of all applications. Once Green Waste issues the next round of funding, all applications on file will be processed at the next available City Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
1. MYF Seaside High School Girls Basketball 2023
2. W-9 Seaside High School Girls Basketball 2023
3. Mayor's Youth Fund Closing Report - Seaside High Girls Basketball 2018 Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 26
Packet Page 27
Packet Page 28
Packet Page 29
Packet Page 30
Packet Page 31
Packet Page 32
Packet Page 33
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.E.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Nisha Patel, Public Works Director/City Engineer
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH WALLACE GROUP FOR
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES
FOR THE CUTINO PARK IMPROVEMENTS PART 2 PHASE 1
PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $189,914.00
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Wallace Group to perform construction management and inspection services for the Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 Project for an amount not to exceed $189,914.00.
BACKGROUND
Cutino Park is a 6.62 acre multi-use park located at the corner of San Pablo Avenue and Noche Buena Street, adjacent to the Boys and Girls Club, in the City of Seaside. Cutino Park is one of the most heavily used parks in the City. The current facilities at the site include a lighted multi-use sports field, bleachers, skate park, snack shack and restroom buildings, storage facilities, basketball/ handball court, playground area, concrete fountain, picnic area, and paved pathways.
The Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Project ("project") will upgrade the remaining portion of the park, and includes replacing existing play structures, storm drainage improvements, adding bleachers, visitors' benches and bike racks, pathways, a parking lot, lighting, and landscaping, and irrigation. The project was designed by Whitson Engineers. The City Council reviewed the park concept plan and provided guidance in May, September, and December 2022. The project was released for construction bids on January 12, 2023, and bids are due on February 16, 2023. The construction contract will be brought to the City Council for approval at the March 2, 2023 meeting.
Packet Page 34
Item No. 8.E. Page 2 of 3
The project is scheduled to take 180 calendar days to complete and requires daily oversight of the contractor. The City does not have the personnel resources to support the project at this time. The Wallace Group (Wallace) is on the City’s list of On-Call Engineering Consultants. Wallace provided construction management and inspection services for the Ellis Park Improvements Project, which recently completed construction and is in the close-out phase. At the request of the City, Wallace submitted a proposal to provide construction management and inspection services. The services include preconstruction coordination, submittal review, contractor coordination, response to contractor's request for information, processing change order requests, quantity calculations, progress estimates, daily inspections, site documentation, materials testing coordination, assistance with the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) tracking and reporting, and project closeout. Wallace Group will retain 360 PSM for labor compliance monitoring and Earth Systems for geotechnical inspection and testing. Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds the scope and fee acceptable.
Staff recommends adopting a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Wallace Group for an amount not to exceed $189,910.00 for construction management and inspection services for the Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 Project.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
Pursuant to preliminary review of the activities associated with this Council action in accordance with Section 15061 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This project is Categorically Exempt (Class 1, Existing Facilities). The project repairs and performs minor upgrades to the existing park and involves negligible or no expansion of use.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Professional Services Agreement for Wallace Group to perform construction management and inspection services Cutino Park Part 2 Phase 1 project is for a not to exceed amount of $189,914.00. A 10% contingency adds $18,991.00 for a total of $208,905.00 for construction management and inspection services. The current total fiscal year 2022/2023 budget for the Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 (account no. 348-8910-9570) is $1,218,658.00. In addition, the City has secured an additional $250,000.00 in CDBG funds for fiscal year 2023/24 for Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 Project. Currently, there are encumbrances of only $110,000.00 (and up to $121,000.00 with approved amendments) for a professional services agreement with Whitson Engineers for civil engineering design, and $5,000.00 for a professional services agreement with Michael Baker for CDBG grant support services during bidding. There are sufficient funds in the Cutino Park account for Wallace Group to perform construction management and inspection services for the Packet Page 35
Item No. 8.E. Page 3 of 3
Cutino Park Part 2 Phase 1 project.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution
2. Professional Services Agreement
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 36
RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE
AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WALLACE
GROUP TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE CUTINO PARK IMPROVEMENTS PART 2 PHASE 1 PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $189,914.00
WHEREAS, the Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 Project (Project) is adopted in the fiscal year 2022/2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) annual budget; and
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2022, the City entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Whitson Engineers to design the Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Project in the amount of $110,000.00; and
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2022, the City Council approved reallocating $250,000.00 from the Pump Track project to the Cutino Park Part 2 Project; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2022, the City Council reviewed and approved the concept plan for the Cutino Park Improvements Part 2; and WHEREAS, on December 22, 2022, the City entered into an agreement with Michael Baker for CDBG grant support services for the project in the amount of $5000.00; and
WHEREAS, the project bidding documents were released for construction bids on January 12, 2023 and bids are due on February 16, 2023; and WHEREAS, the project requires daily inspections, support to review submittals and respond to request for information submitted by the contractor during construction and the city does not have the staffing resources to support this project; and WHEREAS, Wallace Group (Wallace) is on the City approved list of design consultants to perform professional and technical services for implementation of the CIP; and
WHEREAS, Wallace submitted a proposal to perform construction support and inspection services for the Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 Project from preconstruction through project closeout in the amount of $189,914.00; and Packet Page 37
WHEREAS, Staff has determined the proposed scope of work and budget are reasonable; and
WHEREAS, an amount of $18,991.00 contingency, 10% of the agreement value, should be authorized on an as required basis, for a total agreement value of $208,905.00; and
WHEREAS, the current total fiscal year 2022/23 budget for Cutino Park (account no. 348-8910-9570) is $1,218,658.00, not including encumbrances; and WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds in the Cutino Park account for Wallace Group to perform construction management and inspection services for the Cutino Park Part 2 Phase 1 Project.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside authorizes the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Wallace Group to perform construction management and inspection services for the Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 Project for an amount not to exceed $189,914.00 and written amendments such that the total agreement does not exceed $208,905.00.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular City Council meeting of the City of Seaside duly held on the 16th day of February 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
Packet Page 38
Rev. 1/18 Page 1 COS Construction Management PSA
CITY OF SEASIDE
DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
CUTINO PARK IMPROVEMENTS PART 2 PHASE 1
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective ____________________, between the City of Seaside, a municipal corporation ("Agency") and the Wallace Group, a California Corporation (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on _____________, 2023 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2024, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES
Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE
Consultant shall perform all professional services in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same or similar locality. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. AGENCY MANAGEMENT
Agency’s City Engineer shall represent Agency in all matters pertaining to the administration of this Agreement, review and approval of all products submitted by Consultant, but not including the authority to enlarge the Tasks to Be Performed or change the compensation due to Consultant. Agency’s City Manager shall be authorized to act on Agency's behalf and to execute all necessary documents which enlarge the Tasks to Be Performed or change Consultant's compensation, subject to Section 5 hereof.
Packet Page 39
Rev. 1/18 Page 2 COS Construction Management PSA
5. PAYMENT
(a) The Agency agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed one hundred eighty nine thousand and nine hundred and fourteen Dollars ($189, 914.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
(b) Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the Agency City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by Agency City Manager and Consultant at the time Agency's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services.
(c) Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, or as soon thereafter as practical, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the Agency disputes any of Consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE (a) The Agency may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the Agency suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
(b) In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the Agency shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the Agency. Upon Packet Page 40
Rev. 1/18 Page 3 COS Construction Management PSA
termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.
7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT
(a) The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, Agency shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. (b) If the Agency Manager or his/her delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he/she shall cause to be served upon the Consultant a written notice of the default.
The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the Agency shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
(a) Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts, and other such information required by Agency that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of Agency or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records; shall give Agency the right to examine and audit said books and records; shall permit Agency to make transcripts therefrom as necessary; and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
(b) Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole Packet Page 41
Rev. 1/18 Page 4 COS Construction Management PSA
property of the Agency and may be used, reused, or otherwise disposed of by the Agency without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the Agency, at the Consultant's office and upon reasonable written request by the Agency, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring, and printing computer files.
(c) The city agrees to hold Consultant harmless from all damages, claims expenses, and losses arising out of any reuse of the plans, specifications, drawings, maps, models, computer files and other documents for purposes other than those described in this Agreement, unless written authorization of Consultant is first obtained.
9. INDEMNITY AND DEFENSE
(a) Indemnification and Defense for Professional Services To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Agency and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, to the extent they arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant.
Consultant’s duty to defend shall consist of reimbursement of defense costs incurred by Agency in direct proportion to the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault. Consultant’s percentage of fault shall be determined, as applicable, by a court of law, jury or arbitrator. In the event any loss, liability or damage is incurred by way of settlement or resolution without a court, jury or arbitrator having made a determination of the Consultant’s percentage of fault, the parties agree to mediation with a third party neutral to determine the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault for purposes of determining the amount of indemnity and defense cost reimbursement owed to the Agency.
(b) For All Other Liabilities
Notwithstanding the foregoing and without diminishing any rights of Agency under Section 9.A, for any liability, claim, demand, allegation against Agency arising out of, related to, or pertaining to any act or omission of Consultant, but which is not a design professional service, Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Agency, its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorney fees and expert witness fees), judgments, settlements, and/or arbitration awards, whether for personal or Packet Page 42
Rev. 1/18 Page 5 COS Construction Management PSA
bodily injury, property damage, or economic injury, and arising out of, related to, any concurrent or contributory negligence on the part of the Agency, except for the sole or active negligence of, or willful misconduct of the Agency.
10. INSURANCE
Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit C attached to and part of this Agreement.
11. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT
(a) Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the Agency a wholly independent Consultant. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither Agency nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers, employees, or agents of the Agency. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatever against Agency, or bind Agency in any manner. (b) No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, Agency shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for Agency. Agency shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES
The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The Agency, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this Section.
13. UNDUE INFLUENCE
Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure is used against or in concert with any officer or employee of the Agency in connection with Packet Page 43
Rev. 1/18 Page 6 COS Construction Management PSA
the award, terms or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of the Agency will receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from Consultant, or from any officer, employee or agent of Consultant, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling the City to any and all remedies at law or in equity.
14. NO BENEFIT TO ARISE TO LOCAL EMPLOYEES
No member, officer, or employee of Agency, or their designees or agents, and no public official who exercises authority over or responsibilities with respect to the Project during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any agreement or sub-agreement, or the proceeds thereof, for work to be performed in connection with the Project performed under this Agreement.
15. RELEASE OF INFORMATION/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
(a) All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without Agency's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants, shall not without written authorization from the Agency Manager or unless requested by the Agency Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories, or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the Agency.
Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives Agency notice of such court order or subpoena. (b) Consultant shall promptly notify Agency should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions, or other discovery request, court order, or subpoena from any person or party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the Agency. Agency retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing, or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with Agency and to provide the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, Agency's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by Agency to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
16. NOTICES
Packet Page 44
Rev. 1/18 Page 7 COS Construction Management PSA
Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by notice:
To Agency: __City of Seaside__________
__440 Harcourt Ave________
__Seaside, CA 93955_______
Attention: City Clerk
To Consultant: Wallace Group
612 Clarion Court
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
Att: Kari E. Wagner. PE_
17. ASSIGNMENT
The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the Agency. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Rick Riedl shall be the Project Manager and Engineer of Record for the services described in this Agreement.
Rick Riedl may use assistants, under its direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide Agency fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Rick Riedl from Consultant's employ. Should he/she leave Consultant's employ, the Agency shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the Governing Board and the Consultant.
18. LICENSES
At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.
19. GOVERNING LAW
Packet Page 45
Rev. 1/18 Page 8 COS Construction Management PSA
The Agency and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the Agency.
20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
21. WORK SCHEDULED/TIME OF COMPLETION
Agency and Consultant agree that time is of the essence in this Agreement.
Consultant shall perform as described in Exhibit A.
22. CONTENTS OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND PROPOSAL
Consultant is bound by the contents of Agency's Request for Proposal, Exhibit "D" hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and the contents of the proposal submitted by the Consultant, Exhibit B hereto. In the event of conflict, the requirements of Agency's Request for Proposals and this Agreement shall take precedence over those contained in the Consultant's proposals.
23. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT
The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he/she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.
(Signatures on next page)
Packet Page 46
Rev. 1/18 Page 9 COS Construction Management PSA
CONSULTANT: Wallace Group________
A California Corporation
By: ______________________________ Date:_________________ Kari E. Wagner, Principal
City of Seaside_______________________
A Municipal Corporation
______________________________ Date:_________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Attachments: Exhibit A Scope of Work & Fee Schedule
Exhibit B Insurance Requirements
Exhibit C RFQ: On-Call Consultants – Engineering Services Exhibit D Resolution 22-62 On-Call Services
February 8, 2023
, PE 66026
Packet Page 47
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
Packet Page 48
January 31, 2023
Nisha Patel, Public Works Director
City of Seaside
440 Harcourt Ave.
Seaside, CA 93955
Subject: Construction Management Services for Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Project – Revision 2
Dear Ms. Patel:
Wallace Group appreciates the opportunity to provide you with our proposal for construction management services for the above referenced project. Based on our discussion, the following Scope of Services has been prepared for your consideration:
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING/ APPROACH
The City of Seaside (City) is interested in upgrading Cutino Park. The City retained a civil engineering firm, Whitson Engineers (Whitson), to prepare Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&Es) for the proposed upgrades at Cutino Park. The PS&Es for Cutino Park generally consist of civil, landscape architecture, and electrical plans as Adobe PDF, an Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Cost as Adobe PDF, and project bidding specifications. More particularly the proposed improvements and construction documents for Cutino Park includes the removal of existing play structures, paving, planting and irrigation, storm drain, and site furnishings. The project includes providing and installing storm drain pipes, structures, and bioretention pond; concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and walkways; site retaining walls; hot mix asphalt paving; site furnishings including drinking fountain, bike rack, benches, and bleachers; play area including play equipment, engineered wood fiber surfacing and poured in place surfacing; and planting and irrigation (see draft Specification Section 01 11 00 provided by the City). The construction of the improvements would be by CDBG funds and City funds. Per the City’s direction, Wallace Group endeavored to retain Sandra Lee from Michael Baker International (M Baker) from Long Beach to provide labor compliance services. Since M Baker has not provided a proposal for the requested services, we will retain Catalina Ferreto from 360PSM from Salinas California to provide CDBG labor compliance services (Exhibit A). Wallace Group will also retain Earth Systems from Salinas to provide geotechnical services. The proposal from Earth Systems is attached hereto (Exhibit B).
Construction Documents provided are as follows:
• Plans by Whitson dated 12/20/2022 (14 pages)
• Draft Electrical Plans by Arum (undated, 5 pages)
• Landscaping Plans by BFS (undated, 21 pages)
• Draft Project Manual Specifications (undated, 151 pages) • Draft Technical Specifications (undated, 137 pages)
• Draft CDBG compliance documents from Michael Baker (one MS Word document, 2 pages; and one Adobe PDF document, 15 pages)
This project includes the construction management services for the park upgrades as shown in the plans outlined above. It is our understanding that the City of Seaside is looking for a construction management firm to manage the contractor, daily operations, and inspections for this project. This proposal is based upon 180 calendar days for substantial completion and an additional 15 calendar days for final acceptance. This equates to approximately twenty six (26) weeks from Notice to Proceed to Substantial Completion and two (2) additional weeks to Final Acceptance.
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 49
PP22-7744
City of Seaside
January 31, 2023
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Wallace Group will be using Procore project management software to manage all documentation for this project. Procore will store and track all project plans, specification, RFIs, submittals, inspection reports, photos and all other project related documents. All of this information will be available to entire project team in real time.
Given the scope and nature of the project, we envision the following Scope of Services.
Task 1.0: PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
Wallace Group will provide pre-construction management services as outlined below. This task includes preparation and attendance of up to one (1) 3-hour meeting. We have included 33 hours of professional services to complete the work in Task 1.
Preconstruction Conference
Schedule preconstruction conference after contract NTP Develop and distribute agenda prior to conference
Attendees: Wallace Group CM Team, Contractor, City staff, Whitson Engineers Design Team, and 360 PSM Labor Compliance Team
Conduct Procore orientation
Establish electronic workflow and tracking requirements for Submittals within Procore Coordinate list of required submittals with Design Engineer and Contractor Meeting will include contractor responsibility toward:
o Safety/Traffic control
o Public relations
o Site access
o Agreements
o Labor compliance
o Order of work
o Testing and Materials certification
o Weekly meetings
o Submittals and RFI’s
o Quality control
o Procedures for handling extra work or change of conditions o Schedule updates
o Progress pay requests
o Highlight any critical construction items specific to this project Record and distribute meeting minutes
Establish tasks and due dates for outstanding items resulting from conference Conformed Set Contract Documents
Review and coordinate compilation of conformed set of plans and specifications Include addendums, RFIs, Contractors bid proposal and contract Load and maintain conformed set in Procore, available for viewing and download
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 50
PP22-7744
City of Seaside
January 31, 2023
Task 2.0: CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Wallace Group will provide construction management services as outlined below. This task includes preparation and attendance of up to twenty (20) 1-hour meetings. We have included 540 hours of professional services, of which 280 hours are earmarked for on-site construction inspection, to complete the work in Task 2. This equates to approximately four (4) days per week at two and one half (2.5) hours per visit for construction inspection activities.
Coordination of Contract Execution
Determine mobilization schedule in conjunction with project start date Finalize Procore systems record keeping documentation and contract administration developed in preconstruction phase
Project Schedule
Monitor project schedule
Coordinate with contractor and City staff on any schedule changes and adjustments throughout the project
Keep stakeholders informed of construction schedule
Work with contractor to establish and maintain 3 week look ahead schedule Submittal and Request For Information (RFI) Management
Utilize Procore to track status of and distribute:
o Shop drawings
o Product samples
o Submittals
o RFIs
Ensure all submittals are processed in a timely manner and available to all necessary project stakeholders
Maintain electronic copies within Procore
This proposal assumes the processing of up to forty (40) submittals and up to ten (10) RFIs.
Change Order Management
Review and qualify Contractor-requested change orders Investigate proposed change orders, ensure City approval prior to work taking place Change order submittals will include the following supporting documentation o Inspections reports
o Test reports
o Drawings / sketches
o Photographs
o Daily logs and reports
Maintain log and track change order impacts
Establish and maintain files and documentation for use in change negotiations or potential claims
Quantity Calculations and Progress Estimates
Maintain quantity calculations throughout the project Review and qualify contractor’s monthly quantity estimates for payment Keep track of extra quantity items
Coordinate daily reports and quantities with Contractor’s foreman, identify and record potential disputes for future reference
Review monthly Request for Payment, sign and recommend approval for payment to the City Collect daily truck and materials tickets as needed
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 51
PP22-7744
City of Seaside
January 31, 2023
Construction Observation/Inspection
Provide periodic on sight inspections and oversight. Wallace Group will require the Contractor to provide updates to the project construction schedule noting important milestones for inspection. The project schedule updates would be required prior to each project construction meeting (see also “Items Not Included in Scope of Work” below). Inspections and oversight to review compliance with design documents Record and report engineer’s field design modifications Site Documentation
Take pre-construction photos and documentation
Photos include:
o Existing conditions
o Staging and laydown areas
o Surrounding area potentially affected by project
Maintain photos and documentation throughout the project All photos and documentation will be maintained in Procore and available on-demand to entire team
Quality Assurance and Materials Testing
Schedule material sampling and testing in accordance with plans and specifications Sampling and testing will be in accordance with design documents Material Testing reports will be maintained in Procore Reporting and Record Keeping
All documentation, reporting and record keeping will be maintained within Procore, this system provides transparency and immediate access to all documentation throughout the project Files and record-keeping system will be in accordance with City and Caltrans policies and procedures
These items will include but not limited to:
o Daily dairies
o Meeting minutes
o Correspondence
o Plan submittals
o Certificates of compliance
o Material testing
o Photo, CCO, Submittal logs
o Contract Change orders
o Preparing the CDBG reports
Safety
Contractor has sole responsibility for compliance with safety requirements Monitor contractor’s safety practices for compliance with safety program Utilize the following documents during field safety monitoring program:
o Construction safety orders
o Caltrans Safety Manual
o Contractor safety plan
Work with contractor to maintain and resolve any safety concerns on sight Advise City of any observed or unresolved deficiencies Construction Progress Meetings
Schedule and conduct project progress meetings
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 52
PP22-7744
City of Seaside
January 31, 2023
Develop and distribute meeting agenda and minutes
Facilitate the discussion and resolution of project issues Meeting will include
o Project status
o Schedule - 3 week look ahead
o Stakeholder coordination
o Safety
o Testing and Inspections
o Outstanding documentation or submittals
Subtask 2.1: Geotechnical Services
Wallace Group will retain Earth Systems from Salinas to provide construction geotechnical services as outlined in the attached proposal from Earth Systems dated January 13, 2023, attached. Earth Systems included 168 hours of professional services in their proposal. Wallace Group has included 40 hours of professional services to coordinate geotechnical site construction inspections and reporting provided by others in Subtask 2.1.
Subtask 2.2: Labor Compliance Services
As stated above, the Wallace Group is unable to retain Michael Baker to provide labor compliance services because they have not provided a proposal for this project. Therefore, we will retain 360PSM to provide labor compliance services. Wallace Group has also included 30 hours of professional services to coordinate labor compliance services provided by others in Subtask 2.2.
Final Inspection and Punch List
Inspect complete and near complete work for deficiencies Establish and maintain punch list and track items to resolution Provide completed punch list documentation and report to City upon completion Schedule final walk through with City
Recommend and approve final payment to contractor
Assist with the preparation and signing of the Acknowledgement of Construction Closeout and Release of Claims form
Task 3.0: POST-CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
Wallace Group will provide construction management services as outlined below. This task includes preparation and attendance of up to two (2) 1-hour meeting. We have included 60 hours of professional services to complete the work in Task 3.
Record Drawings
Review and maintain record drawings with contractor throughout the project Assist City and Design Engineer in review and completion of record drawings Project Closeout
Review final payment package from the contractor and recommend for payment Assemble and deliver project records, reports, certificates, and pictures upon project completion
Perform final walk-throughs with the City and Contractor Post Construction Deliverables:
Forward field record drawings to the design consultant for preparation of record drawings Prepare close out files as electronic copy in pdf format, and deliver to the City following the completion and acceptance of the Project.
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 53
PP22-7744
City of Seaside
January 31, 2023
TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
CDBG grant report filing
Design Support Services
Client shall provide the DIR Project Number for this project. To do so, the Client will need to complete the PWC-100 form and submit to the DIR prior to the commencement of the field survey. This is required to be in compliance with State of California Prevailing Wage laws.
ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following services may also benefit your project. Wallace Group can provide these services, either inhouse or through sub-consultants, however, they are not included in the current Scope of Services or estimate of fees:
This proposal provides for up to 4 site visits per week for up to 28 weeks. Additional costs would be incurred in the event that the project is delayed of daily on-site inspections and oversight are required.
Professional engineering services
Playground compliance (CPSI)
The Building Department should perform ADA-compliance Construction surveys and staking
Coordination with utilities
Preparation of record drawings
PROJECT FEES
Wallace Group will perform the services denoted in Tasks 1 through 3 above to the proposed Scope of Services on a time and materials basis. For budgeting purposes, our preliminary estimate is that our fees will be $189,914. These services will be invoiced monthly on an accrued basis in accordance with the attached Standard Billing Rates (Exhibit C). Our total fees, including reimbursables will not exceed our estimated fee above without receiving written authorization from the Client. A breakdown of our fee estimate is shown in Exhibit D, attached.
The estimated fees are based on prevailing wage rates. If the Client and the California Department of Labor determines that prevailing wage payments are not required, the fees will be adjusted and billed according to the per hour rate of the Standard Wage column on the Standard Billing Rates provided.
At your request, additional services to the Scope of Services will be performed by Wallace Group following the signature of our Contract Amendment or the initiation of a new contract.
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 54
PP22-7744
City of Seaside
January 31, 2023
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
In order to convey a clear understanding of the matters related to our mutual responsibilities regarding this proposal, we will perform the work in accordance with mutually agreed terms based on the City of Seaside Design Professional Service Agreement. If this proposal meets with your approval, please let us know, and we will facilitate conforming a contract to the project once the City provides.
We want to thank you for this opportunity to present our proposal for construction management services. If you would like to discuss this proposal in greater detail, please feel free to contact me or Project Manager Rick Riedl.
Sincerely,
WALLACE GROUP, a California Corporation TERMS AND CONDITIONS ACCEPTED:
Kari E. Wagner, PE C66026 ____________________________________ Principal/Director of Water Resources Signature
612 Clarion Court ____________________________________
San Luis Obispo Printed Name
California 93401 ____________________________________
T 805 544-4011 Title
F 805 544-4294 ____________________________________
www.wallacegroup.us Date
Attachments
GGM: PP22-7744, 2022
Exhibit A – 360PSM Proposal
Exhibit B – Earth Systems Proposal
Exhibit C – Billing Rates
Exhibit D – Fee Estimate
THIS PROPOSAL IS VALID FOR 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS DOCUMENT.
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 55
360PSM
01-25-2023
Rick Riedl, PE C49631
Principal Engineer
WALLACE GROUP
831 772-5263 | 831 392-5661
Subject: Proposal for Federal Labor Compliance Activities for a CDBG Grant for the City of Seaside Cutino Park Construction Management Project
Dear Mr. Riedl
360PSM is a Certified Woman Minority Business Enterprise (WMBE) founded in 2018. State of California Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE #45909), California Small Business for Purpose of Public Works (SB-PW) certification (ID 2019749), registered with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations, Registration Number: PW-LR-1000653803.
Suppor�ng the WALLACE GROUP team will be Catalina Ferreto, President of 360PSM. 360PSM recently provided non-engineering support services on a Federally Funded infrastructure project and on a State of California funded infrastructure project. 360PSM is commited to working with the WALLACE GROUP team on the Cu�no Park Construc�on Management Project for City of Seaside
360PSM will provide the following services
· Federal Labor Compliance Activities for a CDBG Grant
We look forward to working with you and the other team members on this important project for The Cutino Park Construction Management Project for City of Seaside. The main point of contact for this project is Catalina Ferreto and she can be reached by phone at 831-500-1263 by mail at 18110 Stonehaven Dr, Salinas CA, 93908 or via email at [email protected] Catalina Ferreto
360PSM
President
831-500-1263
[email protected]
EXHIBIT A Exhibit A
Packet Page 56
Project Understanding Scope of work
Federal Labor Compliance
360PSM
Project Understanding
The project includes demolition, tree removal, and earthwork; storm drainpipes, structures, and bioretention pond; concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and walkways; site retaining walls; hot mix asphalt paving; site furnishings including drinking fountain, bike rack, benches, and bleachers; play area including play equipment, engineered wood fiber surfacing and poured in place surfacing; and planting and irrigation.
Scope of Work
Wallace Group is interested in having 360PSM to provide Federal Labor Compliance activities for a CDBG grant for the subject project.
The general scope of work:
Pre-Construction Phase
1. Participate in a pre-construction meeting.
2. Assist City with HUD FORM 4230A (if applicable)
3. Provide link and review with the contractor with a copy of the “Contractor's Guide to Prevailing Wage Requirements for Federally Assisted Construction Projects.” Construction Phase
1. Perform labor compliance – check payroll etc. and site interviews.
2. Participate in approximately 20 construction meetings.
3. Assist City with federal forms Semi-Annual Report form (HUD-4710).
Post-Construction Phase
1. Participate in approximately 2 post-construction meetings.
2. Prepare HUD semi and annual reports forms Semi-Annual Report form (HUD-4710)..
Labor Compliance Monitoring.
1. Review contract provisions and labor compliance requirements with the project team.
2. Determine the specific labor standards and dates of effect for Wage Federal Davis Bacon and State Prevailing Wages for the construction project
3. Set up and maintain all compliance files and documents relating to prevailing wage for Federal Davis Bacon and State Prevailing Wages activities.
4. Set up and maintain labor compliance files tracking the prime contractor and subcontractors.
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 57
Project Understanding Scope of work
Federal Labor Compliance
360PSM
5. Attend pre-construction meetings to discuss prevailing wage requirements with contractor and subcontractors.
6. Review Contractor's compliance with all State and Federal required postings such as the prevailing wage rates and EEO policies as well as the Contractor's Affirmative Action Plan.
7. Verify that certified payroll records are submitted by prime contractors and their subcontractors
8. Conduct Employee Field Interviews to confirm worker classification and wage rate of the project workforce conforms to the applicable contract provisions.
9. Reconcile Weekly Certified Payroll Reports (CPR) & supporting documentation with wage decision and employee field interviews. Perform continuous and timely monitoring reviews of CPRs and related submissions for compliance.
10. Review and verify Fringe Benefit Statements are consistent with the contract provisions and State of California requirements.
11. Monitor the submittal of Training Fund Contribution Reports.
12. Monitor workforce utilization reports to verify trade and apprenticeship participation.
13. Identify violations and investigate complaints of underpayment to workers.
14. Notify Wallace Group regarding delinquent, uncertified, inaccurate, and improperly completed payroll records and recommend appropriate corrective action for lack of strict compliance.
Wage Underpayment and Restitution Activities
1. Identify wage underpayment through audits of payroll documents, during onsite employee interviews or by complaints filed by workers on the project.
2. Calculate and recommend to Wallace Group the amount of wages that will be withheld from the contractor's payments/retention.
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 58
Project Understanding Scope of work
Federal Labor Compliance
360PSM
3. Prepare documentation that list the week endings worked, the name of the worker, trade classification, number of hours worked, rate paid, correct prevailing wage rate and the amount due each worker. Prepare and submit documentation to Wallace Group.
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 59
Cost Proposal
360PSM
Federal Labor Compliance
Compensation
We have reviewed the contract documents and have developed an estimated where work will be performed on “T&M” time and material basis and “NTE” not-to-exceed proposal amount.
If project services are needed beyond the duration, the fee would be extended at the following hourly rate.
The Duration of this construction project is 195 Calendar Days.
Conclusion
We look forward working with you on this important project. Please contact Catalina Ferreto at (831)500-1263 or email [email protected]
Sincerely,
Catalina Ferreto
President
360PSM
(831)500-1263
www.360psm.com
Labor Compliance
Description Hours Rate Total
Federal Labor Compliance 180 $125/hour $22.500
Field Interviews 20 $125/hour $2,500
Total Project $25.000
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 60
Catalina Ferreto
360PSM
Labor Compliance Monitoring Officer
Catalina Ferreto
Labor Compliance Monitoring
Firm
Ÿ 360PSM
Areas of Expertise
· Labor Compliance Monitoring
· Prevailing Wages Rates
· Cross check daily reports
· Documents Control Management
· Conducts Field Interviews
· Status Report
· Public outreach
· Marketing and Administrative Support Services
· Marketing consultant Services
· Bilingual Services
Years of Experience
Ÿ 22
Certifications
· FFC: Prevailing Wage/ Labor Compliance
· Contract Compliance Academy- Public Works
· Public Works: Phase 1: PWC-100
· Public Works: Phase 2: Labor Compliance
· Public Works: Phase 3: Apprentices
· Public Works: Phase 4: Fringe Benefits
· Public Works: Phase 5: Skilled Work Force
· Public Works: Phase 6: Federal Davis Bacon
· Public Works CCS, CA
· Federal Public Works (Davis Bacon) CCS, CA
Education
· Boston University San Jose Costa Rica Bachelor’s in
Business Administration and Global Marketing
· Heald College AA
· Heald College Valedictorian
· Monterey Peninsula College (MPC)
Affiliations
· American Public Works Association (APWA)
360PSM was founded in 2018 by Catalina Ferreto
and was created with the goal of assisting
agencies on implementing the guidelines and
procedures for local agencies to comply with labor
compliance and associated provisions derived
from the California Labor Code of Federal
Regulations, regulations of the FHWA , the
California Code of Regulations, and the United
States Department of Labor. We help agencies to
monitor contractor compliance with all the
applicable payment of prevailing wages and
requirements of the contract provisions.
Project Experience:
City of Soledad Construction Management and
Inspection Services for the Orchard Lane Park
Park Project. Project cost $7,767,286
(Continues) Labor Compliance Monitoring
Officer. The project include Technical professional
Construction Management and Inspection
Services related to the proposed Metz/Orchard
Park including but not limited to: park
construction, new building construction, site
demolition, skatepark, splashpad, earthwork and
site
Continues: City Park Revitalization and
Improvement - for Closter Park- EL Gabilan
Play-Lot- : Universal Playground at Northgate
and Williams Ranch Parks . Labor Compliance
Monitoring Officer. The City of Salinas has a
population of 165,000 people, is the largest city in
the County of Monterey and serves as the county
seat. Known as the “salad bowl of the world”, the
community is surrounded by agricultural lands
which drive its economy and shape its heritage.
County of Monterey, Department of Public
Works. Castroville Bicycle/Pedestrian Path and
Railroad Overcrossing: Castroville, CA Project
No. 8622
Fed. Aid Project No: RSTPLE‐5944(111)
Packet Page 61
Catalina Ferreto
360PSM
Labor Compliance Monitoring Officer
Project cost $10.6 million Labor Compliance
The project included a new Bicycle/Pedestrian &
Railroad Overcrossing Bridge is a bicycle and
pedestrian bridge crossing over the railroad tracks
and a new bicycle/pedestrian path parallel to
Highway 156. The bicycle and pedestrian facility,
including a bridge crossing over the Union Pacific
Railroad tracks. The project connected the existing
bike and pedestrian path at Castroville Boulevard.
The project is in northern Monterey County,
northeast of the community of Castroville.
The project did not have a Labor compliance
implementation talent. Catalina provided services
to bring the project up to date on its labor
compliance. Catalina reviewed daily reports and
creating spread sheets to verify Contactors and
subcontractors were on the site and that certified
payrolls were turned in for the corresponding
work week. Verifying on the Department of
Industrial Relations website that each worker was
paid the minimum prevailing wage, Hours worked,
overtime, holidays vacation etc. Helping to file
daily reports and certify payrolls. Creation and
preparation of Payroll record discrepancies and
missing documents.
Pajaro/Sunny Mesa Community Services
District (PSMCSD). Critical Water Supply
improvements for Pajaro (600,000-Gallon Water
Storage Tank) Project cost $2.4 Million Labor
Compliance Monitoring Officer
360PSM and President Catalina Ferreto provided
Pajaro/Sunny Mesa Community Services District
with assistance on the first phase of the project
with Labor Compliance and complying with all
applicable provisions of Section 16100 of Title 8 of
the California Code of regulations, which require
the Contractor to keep accurate records of work
performed as provided in Labor Code Section
1812, to allow Owner to inspect contractor's
payroll records pursuant to Labor Code Section
1776 and Section 16400( e) of Title 8 of the
California Code of Regulations, and to comply with
all requirements imposed by law. And second
phase Field Interview Officer.
San Lorenzo Valley Water District, replace
several redwood water storage tanks in the
Lompico Project cost $1,558,000.00 Labor
Compliance
The project consists on the replacement of several
redwood water storage tanks in the Lompico Area
of the District with modern steel water storage
tanks. Existing tanks at the Kaski, Madrone and
Lewis sites. The Lompico Tanks Project generally
involves Installation of temporary tanks;
Demolition of old tanks, buildings and piping; Site
grading, the installation of storm drains and site
electrical; Installation of new steel tanks.
San Lorenzo Valley Water District, 2020
Pipeline Replacement Project. Project Cost
$1,400.000 Labor Compliance Officer:
The 2020 Pipeline On this the San Lorenzo Valley
Water District proposes to install: Approximately
1900 feet of 6-inch ductile iron water main on
California Drive in Ben Lomond, approximately
1550 feet of 8-inch HDPE water main in Hillside
and Reynolds Drive in Boulder Creek.
San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Glen Arbor
Bridge Pipeline Replacement Project. Project
cost $223,500.00 Labor Compliance
Monitoring Officer.
The project consists of providing 370 LF of new 8-
inch ductile iron water main, suspended from the
existing bridge or buried, as appropriate; with
associated fittings, valves, and appurtenances; and
abandoning in-place the existing 6-inch water
main. Provide traffic control during the work and
repaving of the streets.
San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Quail Hollow
Pipeline Replacement Project. Project Cost
$2.700,000.00 (Continues) Labor Compliance
Monitoring Officer
Packet Page 62
Catalina Ferreto
360PSM
Labor Compliance Monitoring Officer
The Project consist of replace existing potable
water main pipeline in Quail Hollow Road. The
project consists of providing 7,455 LF of new 12-
inch ductile iron water main in Quail Hollow Road,
with associated fittings, valves, services and
hydrants, and abandoning in-place the existing 6-
inch water main.
County of Santa Cruz Project Construction
Management On-Call Services Task order
CSA1- Ridge Drive. Project cost $242,00.00
Officer 360PSM and President Catalina provided
labor compliance services on the project. Catalina
verified certified payrolls were consistent with
daily reports.
Work includes construction of a steel solider pile
and timber lagging retaining wall, roadway
excavation, roadway reconstruction, Midwest
guardrail system, erosion control and revegetation
City of Santa Cruz Project: Design Engineering
for University Tank 4 Replacement
Project cost: 5,691,000.00
Labor Compliance Officer: Officer 360PSM and
President Catalina provided labor compliance
services on the project. Catalina verified certified
payrolls were consistent with daily reports and
Field Interviews
The University Tank 4 Replacement Project
involves, the replacement of the City of Santa Cruz
Water Department’s (City) existing 0.4-
million-gallon (MG) storage tank. The existing
storage tank is located on University of California,
Santa Cruz (UCSC) property on the west side of
Empire Grade in Santa Cruz County.
Right of Entry- Monterey One Water M1W
Castroville CA.
360PSM provide Right of Entry Services for the
Monterey One Water project in cooperation with
the Castroville Community Services.
Catalina Ferreto meet directly with the property
owners, create door hangers to place on each
home. Communicated with property owners in
English and Spanish.
Packet Page 63
BERMUDA DUNES | FREMONT | HOLLISTER | PALMDALE | PASADENA | PERRIS | SALINAS | SAN LUIS OBISPO | SANTA BARBARA | SANTA MARIA | VENTURA Earth Systems
1514 Moffett Street, Suite A | Salinas, CA 93905 | 831.240.4624 | www.earthsystems.com January 10, 2023 Proposal No.: SAL-23-01-003
(Revised January 13, 2023)
Rick Riedl, Principal Engineer
Wallace Group
612 Clarion Court
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
PROJECT: CUTINO PARK IMPROVEMENTS
NOCHE BUENA STREET
SEASIDE, CALIFORNIA
SUBJECT: Revised Proposal for Geotechnical Observations and Testing & Concrete Sampling and Testing Services
Dear Mr. Riedl:
As requested, Earth Systems has prepared this proposal to provide grading observation and compaction testing services for the proposed Cutino Park Improvements in Seaside, California.
This proposal is for geotechnical related consultation, observation, and compaction testing only.
This proposal has been revised to include special inspections related to the proposed electrical equipment.
We understand that the park improvement project will entails construction of a new playground, parking lot, benches, bio-retention pond, flatwork and landscape improvements. The planned improvements are located primarily along the western edge of Cutino Park. We anticipate the majority of the geotechnical observation and testing will be related to construction of the parking lot and flatwork subgrade and basegrade elevations, compaction testing of utility trench backfills, and grading work related to demolition activities.
Geotechnical Observation and Special Inspection and Testing Services A construction schedule was not available during preparation of this proposal. The inspection coverages and site visits were estimated based on prior experience with jobs of a similar size and scope, Civil Plans dated December 20, 2022 (Bid Set, prepared by Whitson Engineers), and provided specifications. We can refine our estimate once a construction schedule is provided.
Our anticipated services during construction are outlined as follows:
1. Collection of soil samples for laboratory testing and performance of laboratory tests to measure dry density – moisture content characteristics of various soil types (compaction curves);
Exhibit B
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 64
Cutino Park Improvements January 10, 2023
(Revised January 13, 2023)
Doc. No.: 2301-006.PRP.REV1/mg 2 Proposal No.: SAL-23-01-003
2. Observation of site conditions following demolition and tree removal activities;
3. Observation and testing related to site preparation, over-excavation, and fill placement;
4. Field observation and compaction testing during playground building pad construction,
5. Compaction testing during backfilling of underground utility trenches;
6. Compaction testing of subgrade and basegrade for asphalt and concrete pavements;
7. Compaction testing of subgrade and basegrade for concrete flatwork;
8. Compaction testing of subgrade and basegrade for City of Seaside Right of Way sidewalks, curb and gutter, and driveway approach;
9. Asphalt placement observation and field density testing;
10. Concrete sampling and testing (electrical equipment pad);
11. Special case anchors (mechanical/epoxy);
12. Preparation of daily inspection reports summarizing the observed grading activities with the results of the in-place field compaction tests performed during the day; and
13. Engineering consultation/scheduling/supervision/project management of the services provided by our firm.
Field compaction tests will be conducted in accordance with ASTM D 6938 (nuclear test method).
Relative compaction will be determined by performing laboratory maximum density and optimum moisture tests in accordance with ASTM D 1557 and comparing it with the field compaction test.
The total cost of these services is dependent upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Among the cost determining factors are:
• The number of working days required by the contractor to complete each element of work.
• The number of different soil types to be utilized during site grading.
EXHIBIT A
Exhibit C
Packet Page 65
Cutino Park Improvements January 10, 2023
(Revised January 13, 2023)
Doc. No.: 2301-006.PRP.REV1/mg 3 Proposal No.: SAL-23-01-003 • The amount of difficulty encountered by the grading contractor in obtaining the specified compaction of materials.
• Weather and subsurface conditions encountered during grading operations.
• The amount of time our inspection services will be required each day of operations.
Proposed Fees
Earth Systems would provide our geotechnical consultations, laboratory testing, grading observation and testing services on a time and material basis per our fee schedule in effect at the time of services.
Our estimated fee to provide Geotechnical Observation and Testing Services is $20,806.00. Our “Anticipated Scope of Services & Cost Estimate” worksheet is attached for your information and review.
Our actual fee will be based upon a Time and Materials basis per fee schedule in effect at the time of services. Standby time of calls for services not ready will be invoiced on a time and materials basis.
SCHEDULE AND CONDITIONS
The fees and conditions of this proposal will remain in effect for a period of 180 days. As the presence of our personnel at the site will depend upon the contractor's schedule and the progress of the work, the fees presented above are to be considered as estimates only and should not be construed as guaranteed maximum fees. The invoices will reflect the actual charged based on our fee schedule for the amount of time spent and service performed and may be greater or less than the estimated amounts.
Fees for overtime, weekend, and holiday work will be adjusted, and minimum work hours will be applied, in accordance with the State requirements. Night work (before 7:00 AM and after 5:00 PM) and overtime work will be invoiced at a rate of 1.5 times the appropriate rate. Prevailing Wage field time will be subject to a four-hour minimum charge. Hourly fees for field work and travel time will be charged on a portal-to-portal basis from our office in Salinas.
EXHIBIT A
Exhibit C
Packet Page 66
Cutino Park Improvements January 10, 2023
(Revised January 13, 2023)
Doc. No.: 2301-006.PRP.REV1/mg 4 Proposal No.: SAL-23-01-003 It is our understanding that the project is subject to California Prevailing Wage Law. For your convenience in setting up the project, we have included our DIR registration numbers below.
DIR Public Works Registration Numbers
Legal Name
Registration
Number
License
Type*
Registration
Date
Expiration
Date
Earth Systems Pacific 1000003643 N100143 06/07/2018 6/30/2024 *Professional Corporation License Number assigned by DIR March 27, 2015 Please note that effective August 1, 2016, we are required to submit certified payrolls for all Prevailing Wage projects via eCPR. In order to upload certified payrolls to the State’s website, the project’s DIR number is necessary. Please complete the attached Prevailing Wage and Accounts Payable Information Request form and return to our office at your earliest convenience.
If you find the proposed scope of work and fees satisfactory, it is our understanding that you will issue a professional services agreement for our execution and a purchase order as an authorization to proceed.
We thank you for your consideration of Earth Systems for this project. Please feel free to contact the office at your convenience if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Earth Systems Pacific
Amir Khodadadi, PE C87298 Michelle Garcia, CEG
Vice President Senior Engineering Geologist
Attachments: Anticipated Scope of Services & Cost Estimate Prevailing Wage & Accounts Payable Information Request
January 1 2023, Fee Schedule
EXHIBIT A
Exhibit C
Packet Page 67
Project: Cutino Park Improvements Date: 1/13/2023
Proposal No.: SAL-23-01-003
Client: Wallace Group
Prevailing Wage Hourly Rate- Sp. Inspector $150.00 minimum 4 hour billing increments Prevailing Wage Hourly Rate-Technician $145.00 minimum 4 hour billing increments Hourly Rate - Technician $110.00
Nuclear Density (per hour) $15.00
Mileage charge (per mile) $0.95
Personnel Number of Trips Hours/Units Total Rate Unit Fee Grading Observation and Compaction Testing
Senior Professional 3 2 6 $200.00 hr. $1,200.00
Technician, PW 2 4 8 $145.00 hr. $1,160.00
Utility Trench Backfill (Storm Drain) Technician, PW 4 4 16 $145.00 hr. $2,320.00 Technician, PW 3 4 12 $145.00 hr. $1,740.00
Technician, PW 1 8 8 $145.00 hr. $1,160.00
Technician, PW 5 4 20 $145.00 hr. $2,900.00
Technician, PW 2 4 8 $145.00 hr. $1,160.00
Technician, PW 1 4 4 $145.00 hr. $580.00
Nuclear Gauge (Equipment) 72 72 $15.00 hr. $1,080.00
Sample Pickup Technician 2 2 4 $110.00 hr. $440.00
Mileage 23 920 920 $0.95 mi. $874.00
Subtotal $14,614.00
Special Inspection and Materials Testing
Special Inspector, PW 1 4 4 $150.00 hr. $600.00
Special Inspector, PW 1 4 4 $150.00 hr. $600.00
Special Case Anchors (Expansion/Epoxy Anchors) Special Inspector, PW 1 4 4 $150.00 hr. $600.00 Sample Pickup Technician 1 2 2 $110.00 hr. $220.00
Mileage 4 160 160 $0.95 mi. $152.00
Subtotal $2,172.00
Laboratory Testing Hours/Units Total Rate Unit Fee
Laboratory Maximum Density Curve (4”) 1 1 $300.00 ea. $300.00 Laboratory Maximum Density Curve (6”) 2 2 $320.00 ea. $640.00 Asphalt Concrete, Compaction of Lab Samples 1 1 $400.00 ea. $400.00 Concrete Cylinders 5 5 $45.00 ea. $225.00
Subtotal $1,565.00
Reports and Project Management Personnel Hours/Units Total Rate Unit Fee Project Management, Coordination, and Supervision Senior Professional 6 6 $200.00 hr. $1,200.00 Engineering Review and Consultation Principal Professional 3 3 $235.00 hr. $705.00 Final Report 1 1 $550.00 ea. $550.00
Subtotal $2,455.00
Estimated Total: $20,806.00
Rebar Inspection (Electrical Pad)
Concrete Inspection (Electrical Pad)
Asphalt Placement Observation/Testing (City ROW)
Compaction Testing - City ROW (Flawork, C&G, Driveway)
Anticipated Scope of Services & Cost Estimate
Geotechnical Observation and Testing Services
Compaction Testing - Asphalt/Concrete Pavements SG/BG
Compaction Testing - Exterior Flatwork SG/BG
Playground Building Pad
Site Visit - Demolition Activities, Meetings, Etc.
(This will be a "Prevailing Wage" Project)
Asphalt Placement Observation/Testing (Parking Lot)
Exhibit C
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 68
Earth Systems
1514 Moffett Street, Suite A | Salinas, CA 93905 | 831.240.4624 | www.earthsystems.com Prevailing Wage and Accounts Payable Information Request Thank you for this opportunity to be of service on your public works project. Please complete and return this form to allow us to comply with California’s prevailing wage requirements, and to prepare Earth Systems’ invoices in accordance with your organization’s billing requirements in a timely manner. Thank you! Legal Name of Earth Systems
PWC Registration No.
Earth Systems Pacific
1000003643
Earth Systems Project No.
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REGISTRATION INFORMATION:
CLIENT’S PROJECT NAME City of Seaside – Cutino Park Improvements DIR PROJECT ID (PWC-100)
APPLICABLE BID
ADVERTISEMENT DATE
CLIENT’S REPRESENTATIVE FOR
DIR PROJECT ID INFORMATION
Name:
E-mail:
Phone No.:
LABOR COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
(LCP) APPLICABLE TO THIS
PROJECT?
Yes or No
If yes, please confirm if Earth Systems will be subject to the LCP and provide a copy of the LCP manual to Earth Systems before start of project.
CLIENT’S BILLING REQUIREMENTS:
PURCHASE ORDER NO.
(if applicable)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
REQUIRED ON INVOICES
SPECIFY ANY ADDITIONAL
FORMS OR BILLING FORMATS
REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED
WITH INVOICES
(please attach example)
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CONTACT
INFORMATION
Name:
E-mail:
Phone No.:
INVOICE DELIVERY METHOD E-mail:
Mailing Address:
Date January 13, 2023
Exhibit C
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 69
JANUARY 2023 FEE SCHEDULE NC-2210-026.FEE
FEE SCHEDULE
(Effective January 1, 2023)
This schedule presents rates for professional and technical services in the fields of geotechnical engineering, engineering geology, environmental consulting, construction observation and testing, and special inspection. Listed are charges for services most frequently performed by Earth Systems. Additional services not listed are available and can be discussed upon request; fixed-fee quotes for some services can also be provided upon request. To discuss a scope of work and fees for a specific project, please contact our office.
PERSONNEL Hourly Rate
Principal Professional............................................................................................................................................. $250.00 Associate Professional ........................................................................................................................................... $220.00 Senior Professional ................................................................................................................................................ $200.00 Project Professional ............................................................................................................................................... $180.00 Staff Professional................................................................................................................................................... $150.00 CWI & Special Inspector, Prevailing Wage*........................................................................................................... $150.00 Technician, Prevailing Wage* ................................................................................................................................ $145.00 Special Services/Caltrans Technician, Prevailing Wage* ....................................................................................... $145.00 Special Services Technician.................................................................................................................................... $130.00 CWI Inspector ........................................................................................................................................................ $120.00 Special Inspector.................................................................................................................................................... $120.00 Technical Assistant................................................................................................................................................. $105.00 Technician.............................................................................................................................................................. $110.00 Clerical/Administrative .......................................................................................................................................... $100.00 * Technician/Inspector Classifications as defined by the State of California Department of Industrial Relations.
BASIS OF CHARGES, GENERAL
1. Field services for regular work days for non- Prevailing Wage projects are subject to a 2-hour minimum charge, and billed in 2-hour increments.
2. Work performed on Saturdays, night work, and for premium hours (before 7 a.m., after 5 p.m. or more than 8 hours in one day) for personnel are at time and one-half; Sundays and holidays are at double time. Work performed on weekends, holidays, and when work starts outside of regular business hours is subject to a 4-hour minimum charge.
3. A 2-hour cancellation charge applies if scheduled inspection or testing is cancelled after 4 p.m. the day prior to the scheduled work.
4. Mileage is invoiced at a rate of $0.95/mile (portal-to-portal).
5. Nuclear density gauge charge: $15.00/hour.
6. Weekly special inspection report charge: $100.00
7. Subcontracted services, materials, rental equipment, out of town travel, and expenses are charged at cost plus 20 percent. Fixed per diem rates for specific projects can be provided upon request.
8. Report copies: $30.00 each (minimum). Posting of electronic documents to project websites will be charged at clerical/administrative services rate.
9. Invoices are payable upon presentation. Invoices thirty days past due are subject to a service charge of one and onehalf percent per month. Payments using a credit card will be assigned a 3% surcharge.
10. Rates are effective through June 30, 2023.
PREVAILING WAGE PROJECTS
1. Field services for regular work days for Prevailing Wage projects are subject to a 4-hour minimum charge, and billed in 4-hour increments.
2. The prevailing wage (PW) rates presented herein are based on current rates established by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). If, during the course of the project, prevailing wage rates are increased by DIR, rates are subject to adjustment. Also, please note requirements concerning overtime, shift work, travel time, holidays, and other factors can vary for different classifications of work under prevailing wage regulations.
3. Projects where State regulations require electronic submittal of Certified Payroll to DIR for prevailing wage will be assessed a fee of $100.00/week. Additional time required to address specific requests related to DIR/Labor Compliance will be charged at the clerical/administrative services rates.
Exhibit C
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 70
JANUARY 2023 FEE SCHEDULE NC-2210-026.FEE
FEE SCHEDULE - MATERIALS TESTING
(Effective January 1, 2023)
BASIS OF CHARGES
Rates for field work such as materials sampling, construction inspection, and field evaluation will be in accordance with the Personnel Rates listed in the basic Fee Schedule. The below listed rates apply to standard ASTM test methods. An additional hourly charge ($110.00/hr.) will be applied for cutting, capping, or other preparation of non-standard samples and, where noted, for steel samples.
SOILS
All prices are based on California and Modified California sample sizes (2” – 2.5” diameter) unless noted otherwise.
Preparation of 3” diameter samples add $20.00. Testing of contaminated soil will be per quote. Samples will be returned to sender for proper disposal.
Atterberg Limits: Liquid Limit or Plastic Limit................................................................................................................ $125.00 Atterberg Limits: Plasticity Index .................................................................................................................................. $260.00 California Bearing Ratio, 3 points; incl. ref maximum density ...................................................................................... $650.00 California Bearing Ratio, 9 points; incl. ref maximum density ...................................................................................... $945.00 Consolidation, one dimensional.................................................................................................................................... $225.00 Consolidation, timed, per point .................................................................................................................................... $100.00 Basic Corrosivity w/out Rpt (pH, Sulfate, Chl., Resistivity) ........................................................................................ Per Quote Direct Shear, 3 points minimum.................................................................................................................................... $315.00 Expansion Index Test..................................................................................................................................................... $205.00 Maximum Density and Optimum Moisture: 4” Mold ................................................................................................... $300.00 Maximum Density and Optimum Moisture: 6” Mold ................................................................................................... $340.00 Maximum Density and Optimum Moisture: California Impact..................................................................................... $305.00 Moisture and Unit Weight Determination, from Ring Samples...................................................................................... $45.00 Moisture Only.................................................................................................................................................................. $40.00 Permeability Tests, constant head or falling head .................................................................................................... Per Quote R-Value .......................................................................................................................................................................... $325.00 R-Value, CA State Hwy/set of 3, Cement, Lime, Other addts ........................................................................................ $375.00 Hydro Collapse Potential............................................................................................................................................... $165.00 Sieve/Hydrometer Anlys, assumed specific grvty, w/200 wash.................................................................................... $250.00 Sieve Analysis, Aggregate Base/Subbase ...................................................................................................................... $155.00 Sieve Analysis 200 wash only ........................................................................................................................................ $150.00 Sieve Analysis with wash............................................................................................................................................... $135.00 Sieve Analysis, Oversize Material .................................................................................................................................. $215.00 Specific Gravity.............................................................................................................................................................. $150.00 Swell Test, undisturbed................................................................................................................................................. $205.00 Swell Test, remolded..................................................................................................................................................... $230.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength, untreated.............................................................................................................. $150.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength, lime or cement treated mtrl................................................................................. $490.00
THERMAL RESISTIVITY TESTS
Concrete, 1 pt w/moisture content (req spcl collection proc).................................................................................. Per Quote Field Testing using Thermal Resistivity Meter........................................................................................................... Per Quote Soil, per moisture point, per sample......................................................................................................................... Per Quote Soil, 3 moisture points with dry‐out curve, per sample ............................................................................................ Per Quote
CONCRETE AGGREGATE
Abrasion, L.A. Rattler, 100 and 500 revolutions, ASTM C131 (Small Size Aggregate)................................................... $300.00 Abrasion, L.A. Rattler, 100 and 500 Revolutions, ASTM C535 (Large Size Aggregate) ..................................................$560.00 Absorption, Coarse Aggregate ...................................................................................................................................... $100.00 Absorption, Fine Aggregate........................................................................................................................................... $150.00 Clay Lumps and Friable Particles in Aggregate.............................................................................................................. $125.00 Cleanness Value of Coarse Aggregate ........................................................................................................................... $175.00 Crushed Particles, each size .......................................................................................................................................... $150.00 Exhibit C
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 71
JANUARY 2023 FEE SCHEDULE NC-2210-026.FEE
FEE SCHEDULE - MATERIALS TESTING
(Effective January 1, 2023)
CONCRETE AGGREGATE (Cont.)
Durability Index, Coarse or Fine Aggregate................................................................................................................... $200.00 Flat and Elongated Particles in Aggregate..................................................................................................................... $125.00 Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregate............................................................................................................................ $100.00 Potential Reactivity of Aggr by Chemical Method, ea size........................................................................................ Per Quote Sand Equivalent............................................................................................................................................................. $170.00 Sieve Analysis, washed.................................................................................................................................................. $200.00 Soundness, Sodium Sulfate, 5 cycles............................................................................................................................. $450.00 Specific Gravity, Coarse Aggregate................................................................................................................................ $150.00 Specific Gravity, Fine Aggregate.................................................................................................................................... $150.00 Uncompacted Void Cntnt of Fine Agg Angularity, w/fine Agg SG................................................................................. $285.00 Unit Weight of Aggregate.............................................................................................................................................. $150.00
CONCRETE CYLINDERS, BEAMS AND CORES
Compression Test of Cast Cylinders per cylinder............................................................................................................ $45.00* Compression Test of Cored Samples, cored at laboratory............................................................................................ $120.00 Compression Test of cores delivered by others............................................................................................................ $100.00 Compression Test of Lightweight Concrete .................................................................................................................... $50.00* Density of Concrete Cylinders......................................................................................................................................... $80.00 Density of Hardened Concrete ...................................................................................................................................... $105.00 Flexural Strength, Simple Beam with Third Point Loading ............................................................................................ $180.00 Grading of Shotcrete Cores........................................................................................................................................... $190.00 Sample Storage, monthly per sample ............................................................................................................................. $45.00 Shrinkage, set of 3......................................................................................................................................................... $400.00 Unit Weight of Lightweight Concrete............................................................................................................................ $130.00 Enviro. Recycling Fee, per cylinder, core or beam ............................................................................................................ $2.00 Enviro. Recycling Fee, per flex beam................................................................................................................................. $3.00 Enviro. Recycle Fee/Form Stripping, per shotcrete panel/beam .................................................................................... $65.00
MASONRY
Absorption of Block, set of 3 ......................................................................................................................................... $165.00 Compression Test, 2” x 4” Mortar Cylinders................................................................................................................... $40.00* Compression Test, 3” x 3” x 6” Grout Samples ............................................................................................................... $60.00* Compression Test on Block, set of 3.............................................................................................................................. $165.00 Compression Test on Grouted Prisms, includes cutting................................................................................................ $165.00* Compression Test on Masonry Cores.............................................................................................................................. $85.00 Coring of Grouted Masonry by Subcontractor..........................................................................................................cost + 20% Masonry Shrinkage, set of 3.......................................................................................................................................... $245.00 Moisture Content of Block as received, set of 3 ........................................................................................................... $105.00 Shear Test on Masonry Cores, 2 faces .......................................................................................................................... $150.00 Specific Gravity and Unit Weight of Block, set of 3....................................................................................................... $170.00 Enviro. Recycling Fee, per masonry prism......................................................................................................................... $3.00 Enviro. Recycling Fee, per mortar or grout sample........................................................................................................... $2.00 * Includes formal report of test results following 28-Day tests.
FIREPROOFING
Fireproof Bond Test................................................................................................................................................... Per Quote Fireproofing Density Test (1)........................................................................................................................................... $80.00
ASPHALT CONCRETE
Bulk Specific Gravity of Compacted Specimens and Core Samples................................................................................. $80.00 Compaction of Lab Samples, CA Kneading Compactor, set of 3.................................................................................... $240.00 Compaction of Lab Samples, CA Kneading Compactor, set of 5.................................................................................... $400.00 Exhibit C
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 72
JANUARY 2023 FEE SCHEDULE NC-2210-026.FEE
FEE SCHEDULE - MATERIALS TESTING
(Effective January 1, 2023)
ASPHALT CONCRETE (Cont.)
Compaction of Lab Spls, Mrshl Mthd set of 3 –(50 blows/side).................................................................................... $245.00 Compaction of Lab Spls, Mrshl Mthd set of 3 –(75 blows/side).................................................................................... $260.00 Extraction of Oil from A.C. Mixtures.......................................................................................................................... Per Quote Extraction of Oil from Rubberized Mixtures.............................................................................................................. Per Quote Gyratory Compactor, per set of field mixed asphalt ..................................................................................................... $495.00 Hamburg Wheel Tracker Test, per set of field mixed asphalt....................................................................................... $890.00 Ignition Oven Binder Cntnt, after initial corr value is det.............................................................................................. $275.00 Ignition Oven Binder Cntnt Corr Value /mix design, ave of 3........................................................................................ $850.00 Ignition Oven Gradation Correction Value, per mix design....................................................................................... Per Quote Moisture Content ............................................................................................................................................................ $50.00 Sieve Analysis of Extracted Aggregate........................................................................................................................... $285.00 Sieve Analysis of Ignition Oven Residue ........................................................................................................................ $270.00 Specific Gravity, Theoretical Maximum, Rice Method .................................................................................................. $170.00 Stability and Flow, Marshall Apparatus, set of 3........................................................................................................... $240.00 Stabilometer, Hveem S-Value, set of 3.......................................................................................................................... $350.00 Enviro. Recycling Fee, per sample ..................................................................................................................................... $2.00 Enviro. Recycling Fee for Extracted Oils .......................................................................................................................... $45.00
REINFORCING AND STRUCTURAL STEEL
Bend Test of Welded Specimen, sample preparation not incl........................................................................................ $80.00 Pipe Flattening Test, sample preparation not included .................................................................................................. $75.00 Reinforcing Steel Coupler Tensile and Slip Tests........................................................................................................... $250.00 Structural Steel Bend Test, sample preparation not included ........................................................................................ $80.00 Structural Steel Machining/Sample Preparation.......................................................................................................cost + 20% Structural Steel Tensile Test, sample prep not included................................................................................................. $80.00 Tensile and Bend Tests of Reinforcing Bar, #2 through #9............................................................................................ $170.00 Tensile and Bend Tests of Reinforcing Bar, #10 through #18 ................................................................................... Per Quote Enviro. Recycling Fee, per sample ..................................................................................................................................... $2.00
BOLT TESTS
Bolt Tests, chemical or mechanical ...........................................................................................................................cost + 20%
WELDER QUALIFICATION
AWS D1.1: 3/8” Plate, per position ........................................................................................................................... Per Quote AWS D1.1: 1” Plate, per position............................................................................................................................... Per Quote AWS D1.3: Sheet Steel............................................................................................................................................... Per Quote AWS D1.4: Reinforcing Bar........................................................................................................................................ Per Quote ASME/API Pipe Sections............................................................................................................................................ Per Quote EQUIPMENT/CHARGES (Does Not Include Personnel)
110-volt Portable Electric Generator .................................................................................................................... $115.00/day Anchor Pull Test Equipment...................................................................................................................................... $45.00/hr.
Bailer (disposable) w/dedicated rope ...................................................................................................................... $35.00/ea.
Concrete and Asphalt Concrete Coring Equipment...................................................................................................cost + 20% Concrete Slab Moisture Transmission Kit................................................................................................................. $45.00/ea.
Conductivity Meter....................................................................................................................................................cost + 20% Cut-Off Saw ............................................................................................................................................................. $90.00/day Double Ring Infiltrometer (per set)....................................................................................................................... $165.00/day Drum Dolly............................................................................................................................................................... $40.00/day Drums ....................................................................................................................................................................... $90.00/ea.
Dynamometer, In-line Scale ...................................................................................................................................... Per Quote Hammer Drill .............................................................................................................................................................cost + 20% Hand Auger/Sampler Equipment ............................................................................................................................ $65.00/day Lock n, Load VOC Sample Pres. Sys. ......................................................................................................................... $35.00/ea.
Exhibit C
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 73
JANUARY 2023 FEE SCHEDULE NC-2210-026.FEE
FEE SCHEDULE - MATERIALS TESTING
(Effective January 1, 2023)
EQUIPMENT/CHARGES (Cont.) (Does Not Include Personnel)
Magnetic Particle Equipment.....................................................................................................................................$25.00/hr Non-Destructive Testing Equipment ..........................................................................................................................$45.00/hr Manometer ........................................................................................................................................................... $155.00/day Mini-Troll Groundwater Level Transducer............................................................................................................ $115.00/day Mobile Laboratory..................................................................................................................................................... Per Quote Nuclear Density Equipment....................................................................................................................................... $15.00/hr.
Paint Thickness Meter............................................................................................................................................... Per Quote Vehicle with Percolation Tank System .................................................................................................................. $260.00/day Personal Protective Equipment Level C..................................................................................................................... Per Quote Pile Driving Equipment (for pile load testing) ........................................................................................................... Per Quote Pile Load Testing Equipment..................................................................................................................................... Per Quote Pulse Velocity Meter ................................................................................................................................................. Per Quote Rebound Hammer (Schmidt Hammer).................................................................................................................... $80.00/day Reinforcing Steel Locating Equipment (DR-Meter) ............................................................................................... $200.00/day Relative Humidity Meter....................................................................................................................................... $100.00/day Off Road Vehicle........................................................................................................................................................ Per Quote Safety and Specialty Equipment................................................................................................................................ Per Quote Sampling Consumables ............................................................................................................................................. Per Quote Skidmore Bolting Calibration Equipment.............................................................................................................. $255.00/day Slope Inclinometer Equipment, per hole .................................................................................................................. Per Quote Soil Sampling Containers (metal) ............................................................................................................................. $25.00/ea.
Soil Sampling Containers (glass)............................................................................................................................... $10.00/ea.
Tape Extensometer ................................................................................................................................................... Per Quote Tension Equipment ............................................................................................................................................... $200.00/day Torque/Tension Equipment .................................................................................................................................. $200.00/day Water Level Indicator.............................................................................................................................................. $55.00/day Windsor Probe, set of 3............................................................................................................................................. Per Quote Per Diem.................................................................................................................................................................... Per Quote DIR Compliance/eCPR, per week................................................................................................................................... $100.00 DSA Box Posting, ea....................................................................................................................................................... $100.00 DSA Lab Compliance, per week..................................................................................................................................... $100.00 Vehicle Mileage Charge.....................................................................................................................................................$0.95 Exhibit C
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 74
JANUARY 2023 FEE SCHEDULE NC-2210-026.FEE
EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES
(Effective January 1, 2023)
The following rates apply to deposition testimony, arbitration testimony, hearings and court appearances.
HOURLY CHARGES FOR PERSONNEL
Principal Professional ........................................ $400.00 Associate Professional ....................................... $300.00 Senior Professional ............................................ $250.00 Clerical/Admin Services..................................... $100.00
SPECIAL SERVICES
Deposition ................................................. $400.00/hr.2 Arbitration ................................................... $400.00/hr.
Court Appearance/Hearings........... $1,500.00/half day3 Standby to Appear.................................... $750.00/day4
BASIS OF CHARGES
1. Hourly rates are charged during investigation, analysis, consultation, and preparation services.
2. Estimated deposition fee payable in advance by party requesting deposition. The difference between advance payment and final fee to be billed or refunded in accordance with the fee and billing information in this schedule.
Fee for reviewing deposition transcript will be billed at hourly rates to the party requesting the review.
3. Minimum half day charge will apply to court appearances and hearings. Time extending through the noon hour will be subject to the full day charge of $3,000.00.
4. Days, or portions thereof, reserved for appearances at hearings, court, or arbitrations, during which we are not required to be away from our offices will be subject to a standby charge of $750.00. Standby at other locations will be charged at the general hourly rates.
Exhibit C
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 75
Exhibit C
Standard Billing Rates
WALLACE GROUP 1
2022 Standard Billing Rates.doc
Engineering, Design & Support Services:
Assistant Designer/Technician ......................................... $110 Designer/Technician I – IV .............................................. $115/$125/$135/$145 Senior Designer/Technician I – III ...................................... $158/$165/$172 GIS Technical Specialist ................................................. $150 Senior GIS Technical Specialist ........................................ $160 Associate Engineer I – III ................................................ $130/$$140/$150 Engineer I – IV ............................................................. $160/$165/$170/$175 Senior Engineer I - III .................................................... $185/$190/$195 Director .................................................................... $200 Principal Engineer/Consulting Engineer .............................. $240 Principal ................................................................... $260 Construction Management / Field Inspection Services: Prevailing Wage* Construction Inspector I - II ............................................. $135/$150 .................. $165/$172 Senior Construction Inspector .......................................... $155 ................................ $180 Construction Office Tech I-III ........................................... $110/$120/$130 Assistant Resident Engineer I - II....................................... $160/$165 Resident Engineer I - III ................................................. $170/$175/$180 Senior Resident Engineer ............................................... $190 Director .................................................................... $195 Principal Construction Manager ........................................ $225 Principal ................................................................... $260 Support Services:
Office Assistant ........................................................... $100 Project Assistant I – III ................................................... $110/$115/$125 *Prevailing Wage:
State established prevailing wage rates will apply to some services based on state law, prevailing wage rates are subject to change over time and geographic location.
Right to Revisions:
Wallace Group reserves the right to revise our standard billing rates on an annual basis, personnel classifications may be added as necessary.
Additional Professional Services:
Fees for expert witness preparation, testimony, court appearances, or depositions will be billed at the rate of $400 an hour. If required to meet schedule requests, overtime on a project will be billed at 1.5 times the employee’s typical hourly rate.
Direct Expenses:
Direct expenses will be invoiced to the client and a handling charge of 15% may be added.
Sample direct expenses include, but are not limited to the following:
travel expenses sub-consultant services agency fees delivery/copy services mileage (per IRS rates) other direct expenses Invoicing and Interest Charges:
Invoices are submitted monthly on an accrued cost basis. A finance charge of 1.5% per month may be assessed on all balances that are thirty days past due.
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 76
Exhibit D
Exhibit D - Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the Construction Management Services for Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 BUDGET SUMMARY PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL ENGINEER DIRECTOR Assistant Resident Engineer Prevailing Wage Construction Inspector PROJECT ASSISTANT III Earth Systems 360 PSM Misc. Direct Costs TOTAL LABOR HOURS TOTAL TASK DESCRIPTION HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS Cost HRS LABOR COST RATE $260 $240 $200 $165 $180 $125 $ $
1 Pre-Construction Phase Services 15 3 15 $163 33 $6,675 $6,838 2 Construction Phase 80 190 280 $2,188 550 $100,950 $103,138
2.1 Geotechnical Services 6 34 168 $1,565 208 $26,291 $27,856
2.2 Labor Compliance Services 10 30 200 240 $32,350 $32,350 3 Post-Construction Phase Services 30 30 $313 60 $12,150 $12,463 SUB-TOTALS 141 3 299 280 $4,228 1,091 #REF! $182,644
WALLACE GROUP LABOR COSTS $33,840 $600 $49,335 $50,400 $134,175 WALLACE GROUP DIRECT COSTS $2,663
SUBCONSULTANT DIRECT COSTS $20,806 $25,000 $45,806
DIRECT COSTS OVERHEAD @ 15% $7,270
TOTAL $189,914
Task Budgets may fluctuate within Overall Budget PHASE/TASK Fee Seaside Cutino CM.xlsx Summary Page 1 1/31/2023
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 77
Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT B
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of Agency, and prior to commencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to Agency.
General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.
Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.
Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.
Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000).
Consultant shall submit to Agency, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of Agency, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.
Umbrella or excess liability insurance. [Optional depending on limits required].
Consultant shall obtain and maintain an umbrella or excess liability insurance policy with limits that will provide bodily injury, personal injury and property damage liability coverage at least as broad as the primary coverages set forth above, including Packet Page 78
Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 EXHIBIT B
commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability. Such policy or policies shall include the following terms and conditions:
• A drop down feature requiring the policy to respond if any primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason;
• Pay on behalf of wording as opposed to reimbursement; • Concurrency of effective dates with primary policies; • Policies shall “follow form” to the underlying primary policies; and • Insureds under primary policies shall also be insureds under the umbrella or excess policies.
Other provisions or requirements
Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to Agency as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by Agency’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance.
Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with Agency at all times during the term of this contract. Agency reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Work hereunder by Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
Primary/noncontributing. Except for Professional Liability and Workers Compensation, Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by Agency shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of Agency before the Agency’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
Agency’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Agency has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Agency will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Agency will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments.
In the alternative, Agency may cancel this Agreement.
EXHIBIT B
Packet Page 79
Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 EXHIBIT B
Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the Agency’s Risk Manager.
Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against Agency, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against Agency, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
Enforcement of contract provisions (non estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the Agency to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the Agency nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the Agency requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the Agency.
Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to Agency with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage.
Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that Agency and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.
Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting
EXHIBIT B
Packet Page 80
Cutino Park Improvements Part 2 Phase 1 EXHIBIT B
endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to Agency and approved of in writing.
Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to Agency for review.
Agency’s right to revise specifications. The Agency reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the Agency and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation.
Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by Agency. Agency reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by Agency.
Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give Agency prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this AGREEMENT, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.
Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.
EXHIBIT B
Packet Page 81
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
ON-CALL CONSULTANTS - ENGINEERING
FOR CITY OF SEASIDE
Table of Contents
Introduction............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Proposal Requirements........................................................................................................................................... 1 Statement of Qualifications Submittal Requirements........................................................................................... 2 Schedule for Selection Process ............................................................................................................................... 2 Questions Regarding This Project ........................................................................................................................... 3 Form of Agreement ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Evaluation and Rating Criteria................................................................................................................................ 3 PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF SERVICES............................................................................................................... 3 General Provisions ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Non-Discrimination & Non-Preferential Treatment ............................................................................................. 6 Grounds for Disqualification............................................................................................................................... 6 Records and Financial Data ................................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction
The City of Seaside (City) seeks Request for Qualifications (RFQs) from qualified consulting firms or individuals to provide On-Call Engineering Services for miscellaneous undetermined projects.
The selected engineering firms may be requested to help with the design of federal, state and locally funded capital improvement projects. The City intends to select multiple consultants for a three-year period, with the option of two (2) one-year extensions through mutual consent between the City and the chosen Consultant(s). Consultants do not need to be able to provide all services described in the “Preliminary Scope of Services,” below. Selection will be based on demonstrated expertise in providing support to the City of Seaside Public Works and Engineering Department.
Proposal Requirements
Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) must be received by 5:00 PM Friday, April 22, 2022 at the following address:
City of Seaside
440 Harcourt Avenue
Seaside, CA 93955
SOQ received after this deadline will not be accepted. Incomplete responses that do not conform to the requirements specified herein will not be considered. The SOQ and any accompanying documents shall be submitted in a sealed envelope with the words “On-Call ConsultantsEngineering” clearly marked in the lower left-hand corner of the envelope. Three bound copies, plus one electronic copy submitted on CD, USB flash drive, or by email to [email protected], containing an Adobe pdf copy, should be submitted.
Packet Page 82
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 2 - Statement of Qualifications Submittal Requirements
The SOQ should include the following information:
1. Name of proposer and principal contact person, including office location, address, telephone number, fax numbers and e-mail address.
2. Brief description and history of the proposed project team and experience of the principal contact. Clearly describe project team member’s experience in work described under “Preliminary Scope of Services". Describe the average project size and scope of the team member’s past projects.
3. Provide as exhibits, listings of your firm’s and its principals’ and project teams experience demonstrating their capabilities and qualifications to perform the assigned task as described in the “Preliminary Scope of Services”. For each individual, provide current professional registrations, related experience, educational background and years of experience with the team.
4. Enclosed is a copy of the City’s standard contract, which stipulates, among other things, insurance requirements. Please confirm that the project team can accept the terms of the contract and has the required insurance, or can acquire insurance, that meets the minimum standards.
5. Please provide at least three professional references. Indicate which references are public agencies for which the project team, or its principals, have provided services for within the past five years.
6. Standard Hourly Fees: Provide your standard hourly fees by job classification and billing criteria for providing the services described in this RFQ in a separate sealed envelope. Do not provide in the response to this request as an exhibit or in the body of the response The SOQ will be limited to 10 numbered pages including title sheet and cover letter if provided.
Minimum font size is 12. Page size is limited to letter size with no fold-outs. Submittals must be printed on both sides of the paper. A clear front and back cover shall be provided and the front and back clear cover will not count towards the 10 page limit.
Schedule for Selection Process
The proposed consultant selection schedule is as follows.
Release RFQ
Questions Due
Thursday, March 24, 2022
Friday, April 8, 2022
Proposal due
Proposal Ranking
Friday, April 22, 2022
April 24, 2022 – May 20, 2022
Consultant Award (if applicable) Friday, May 27, 2022
Packet Page 83
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 3 - Questions Regarding This Project
All questions and/or contacts regarding this Request should be directed to:
Patrick Grogan
City of Seaside-Engineering Division
440 Harcourt Avenue
Seaside, CA 93955
E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Phone (831) 899-6885
Form of Agreement
A copy of the City of Seaside Consultant Contract is included herewith.
Evaluation and Rating Criteria
City staff will review each SOQ for completeness and content. Each SOQ will be evaluated based upon the relevant qualifications and experience of the consultant. Consultants do not need to be able to provide all services described in the “Preliminary Scope of Services,” below. Staff may conduct interviews if necessary. References may also be verified. The SOQ review will focus upon the following criteria:
1. Experience and demonstrated ability of the team. – 25 points
2. Appropriate relevant experience and skills of personnel (principals, project managers and other key personnel). – 30 points
3. Prime consultant and sub-consultants experience in providing similar projects. – 15 points
4. Client References. – 10 points
5. Overall quality of the response and conformance with SOQ requirements for content (reference Proposal and Submittal Requirements). – 20 points
SOQs will be ranked on the basis of qualifications. The City of Seaside may conduct interviews with some or all of the firms/individuals who submit proposals, or it may complete its evaluation based on the proposals alone. If interviews are conducted, firms/individuals selected for interview will be contacted at that time to arrange the date and time for their interview.
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant is required to provide engineering design and professional services for various projects to be implemented throughout the City. The scope of work under this contract may include but not be limited to the following:
A. Engineering Services
Design, Survey and Geometrics
Pavement Evaluation, Design and Testing
Pavement Management Program Evaluation and Report
Packet Page 84
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 4 - Hydrology/Hydraulic Analysis
Structural Analysis and Design
Well Design and Rehabilitation
Water System Design and Rehabilitation
Storm Drain System Design and Rehabilitation
Value Engineering
Seismic Evaluations
Construction Phase Services
B. Professional Services
Disabled Accessibility Evaluations and Mitigation
Preliminary Engineering Studies
Technical Studies and Reports
Peer Reviews
Coordination with Other Agencies and Utilities
Constructability and Bidability Reviews
On-Call Services
Staff Augmentation
All materials submitted to the City will become the exclusive property of the City of Seaside.
The consultant will not be allowed to provide services when the City determines a potential conflict of interest may exist.
Consultant services will be on an as-needed, on-call basis. Consultant services will be authorized by separate contract(s). The Consultant is responsible for acknowledging receipt of requests for services within two (2) working days. Contracts may vary significantly in size and scope and will be determined in greater detail as each is assigned. The Consultant will be responsible for preparing a detailed scope and fee estimate for each contract request and shall identify the number of hours to be worked and position of each person performing work on a particular proposal. If during actual work the number of hours is increased by more than 20% of the estimate, the consultant shall notify the Project Manager as soon as possible before exceeding the estimated time. The City may elect to reduce the scope of work or may require a revised scope of work to cover the excess time. Work authorization will be issued for each work request. The City shall authorize all consultant quotes for tasks prior to the consultant commencing work. The City may accept the Consultant’s scope and fee or negotiate with the Consultant, as appropriate. The City reserves the right to not accept the Consultant’s scope and fee.
General Provisions
1. The City will assume no responsibility for any understandings or representations concerning conditions made by any of its officers or employees prior to execution of a final agreement unless they are included in this Request for Qualifications.
2. Any reasonable inquiry to determine the responsibility of a prospective Consultant(s) may be conducted. The submission of Qualifications shall constitute permission by the Packet Page 85
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 5 - prospective Consultant(s) for the City to verify all information contained therein. If the City deems it necessary, additional information may be requested from the prospective Consultant(s) for further consideration.
3. A prospective Consultant(s) may withdraw their Qualifications at any time prior to the date and time which is set forth herein as the deadline for acceptance of Qualifications.
4. Each prospective Consultant(s) submitting Qualifications in response to this Request agrees the preparation of all materials for submittal to the City and all presentations are at the prospective entities sole cost and expense, and the City will not, under any circumstances, be responsible for any costs or expenses incurred by a prospective Consultant(s). In addition, each prospective Consultant(s) agrees that all documentation and materials submitted with Qualifications will remain the property of the City and will become a public document.
5. The City reserves the right to request additional information from any and all prospective entities as deemed necessary by the City in order to evaluate the Qualifications. This process may not be used as an opportunity to submit missing documentation or to make substantive revisions to the original Qualifications.
6. The City reserves the right to reject any and all Qualifications and, in the event the Consultant selected, it may attempt to negotiate an agreement with the Consultant that, in the sole judgment of the City, is the best qualified to provide the services requested.
7. The City shall not enter into an agreement with any prospective Consultant(s) that has previously had an agreement with the City terminated, or that has previously been found to have violated any provision of the Seaside City Code, or related resolutions or ordinances, or any provision of federal law, state, or other local law.
8. The City reserves the right to enter into an agreement with an Consultant(s) at any time, deviate from this Request, reject any or all SOQs, continue to advertise for new Qualifications, negotiate with multiple entities simultaneously, waive any defects in Qualifications, or to proceed otherwise. The Request and the selection process will in no way be deemed to create a binding contract or agreement of any kind between the City and any prospective Consultant(s). The submission of Qualifications does not in any way commit the City to enter into an agreement with any prospective Consultant(s).
9. Each prospective Consultant(s) shall agree to abide by all federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations and to secure all necessary licenses, permits, and other forms of identification as may be required in connection with the resulting agreement, all at no additional cost to the City.
10. All Qualifications, charge rates or representations will remain in effect and be legally binding for at least one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of submission.
Packet Page 86
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 6 -
11. This Request for Qualifications shall be governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California and the jurisdiction of any disputes hereunder shall be had in Monterey County.
Non-Discrimination & Non-Preferential Treatment
The successful Consultant shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, sex, color, age, religion, sexual orientation, actual or perceived gender identity, disability, ethnicity, or national origin, in connection with or related to the performance of City of Seaside contracts.
Grounds for Disqualification
All prospective entities are expected to conduct themselves with the utmost integrity and responsibility throughout the Request process. Any prospective Consultant(s) that violates these expectations, as determined in the sole discretion of the City, will be subject to disqualification.
Generally, the grounds for disqualification include:
1. Contact regarding this procurement with any City official or employee, other than the contact person designated in this Request, from the time of issuance of this Request until the consideration and approval of a professional services agreement.
2. Evidence of collusion, directly or indirectly, among prospective entities in regard to the amount, or the terms and conditions of this Request and the prospective agreement.
3. Influencing, or attempting to influence, any City staff member or official throughout the solicitation process, including the development of specifications beyond those included here, if any.
4. Evidence of submitting incorrect or inaccurate information in response to this Request or misrepresentation or failing to disclose facts during the evaluation or negotiation process.
5. Existence of any lawsuit, claim, or dispute between the prospective Consultant(s) and the City.
6. Evidence of the prospective Consultant(s)’s inability to successfully complete the responsibilities and obligations of the Request process.
7. The prospective Consultant(s)’s default under any City agreement or termination of a previous agreement.
Records and Financial Data
All correspondence with the City, including responses to this Request, will become the exclusive property of the City and will become public records under the California Public Records Act. All documents submitted in response to this Request will be subject to disclosure if requested by a member of the public. There are a very limited number of narrow exceptions to this disclosure requirement.
Packet Page 87
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 7 - Personal financial information that a prospective Consultant(s) considers confidential, the disclosure of which would be an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, should be submitted in a sealed envelope marked “CONFIDENTIAL: PERSONAL FINANCIAL RECORDS; NOT PUBLIC RECORDS.” A prospective Consultant(s) should not mark their entire Qualifications as “Confidential.” During the selection process, the City will keep such information confidential and will not disclose it, except as otherwise required under applicable law. This means that, depending on the nature of timing of the request, or future court decisions, that personal financial information may not remain private and may be publicly disclosed. Once the selection process is completed, the City will return this information to any prospective agency that is not selected.
If an Consultant(s) is selected, the City may retain any submitted information and disclose it to the City Council, and any subcommittees thereof, and the public in connection with consideration of an agreement with the City as evidence of the entities ability to carry out the development. Given the nature of the applicable law under the California Public Records Act, the City cannot guarantee or warrant that it will be able to keep submitted information, including personal financial records, confidential. The successful Consultant(s) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from and against any suit brought under the California Public Records Act to obtain the records; otherwise, the City shall not be obligated to defend such suit and may release the records.
Packet Page 88
Packet Page 89
Packet Page 90
Packet Page 91
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.F.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Nisha Patel, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Dave Fortune, Maintenance and Utilities Superintendent
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF MONTEREY TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION
SUPPORT SERVICES TO THE ARMY WITHIN SEASIDE CITY
LIMITS, AND AUTHORIZING THE WITHDRAWAL FROM AND
TERMINATION OF THE PRESIDIO PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the City of Monterey to provide support services to the Army, and authorizing the withdrawal from and termination of the Presidio Public Works Agency, also known as the Presidio Municipal Services Agency.
BACKGROUND
The City of Monterey and the City of Seaside have been providing base installation maintenance and repair services to the Army since 1998 under the auspices of the joint powers agency (“JPA”) known as the Presidio Municipal Services Agency (PMSA). This innovative approach of a public-public partnership became known nationwide as the “Monterey Model”. The 2012 federal legislation for Intergovernmental Service Agreements or IGSAs was developed as a direct result of cities' successful collaboration.
Since then, the Armed Services have formed hundreds of similar partnerships based on the “Monterey Model”. The IGSA between the Presidio of Monterey and the cities remains the single largest one in the nation.
There are three principal Army installation sites: 1) Presidio of Monterey (POM) within Monterey's city limits; 2) Presidio of Monterey Annex (POMA) within Seaside's city limits; and 3) U.S. Army Signal Activity (USASA) located at Camp Roberts, California.
Packet Page 92
Item No. 8.F. Page 2 of 3
The primary tenant of the Presidio of Monterey Annex (POMA), also known as Ord Military Community (OMC), is the Defense Language Institute's foreign language students who attend the training facility at the Presidio of Monterey (POM). This is the largest foreign language training facility in the western world. More than 65 foreign languages are taught. The installation accommodates a large student population, instructors, and civilian employees. The City maintains over 35 facilities to include the maintenance of streets and the storm drain system within the OMC.
The City provides support services for administration buildings, childcare centers, medical/dental facilities, streets and forestry. In addition, the City supports the Post Exchange, private cafes and gas stations. The City services include, but are not limited to: fencing, painting, electrical, plumbing, carpentry, pest control, tree maintenance, fire protection systems, project & construction management, streets and surfaced areas maintenance, and maintenance of generators.
On October 11, 2016, the first IGSA was signed for a term of no more than five years, and Monterey City Council amended the original IGSA on September 27, 2021 to be extended through March 31, 2023. Federal legislation in 2016 only allowed an IGSA term to be five years. The legislation has since changed and IGSAs may have a term of no more than ten years. Staff from the City of Monterey, City of Seaside and the Army have been working on developing a new 10-year IGSA since June 2021. Due to federal government funding requirements, the IGSA is structured so that each federal fiscal year is a new option period with the overall term of the IGSA not to exceed ten years.
Since 1998, the City of Monterey has been the lead agency in providing PMSA services.
In order to increase efficiencies and ensure legal compliance, staff recommends no longer utilizing the JPA. In substance, the City of Monterey provides the services to the Army while the City of Seaside is a subcontractor. Consequently, the new IGSA is structured to be between the Army and the City of Monterey, which accurately reflects how the installation support services have been and will continue to be provided.
The City of Seaside has provided installation support services at the Presidio of Monterey Annex or Ord Military Community. Although the IGSA will now be between Monterey and the Army, both cities desire for Seaside to continue to provide installation support services. To sustain and foster Monterey’s long-term partnership with the City of Seaside, the cities drafted an agreement for Monterey to contract with the City of Seaside to continue providing installation support services at POMA. It is estimated that the City will generate $1.1 million annually in installation support services under this agreement. Under this agreement, Monterey will not be obligated to pay Seaside until payment is received from the Army and the agreement will terminate if the IGSA terminates. This spring, staff will ask the Council to dissolve the PMSA. If the Council concurs, the two cities will convene for a final PMSA Board meeting and officially dissolve the Joint Powers Agreement. The required filing with the State will be submitted as well.
Packet Page 93
Item No. 8.F. Page 3 of 3
FISCAL IMPACT
The City’s current adopted budget is sufficient to cover the estimated cost for scheduled maintenance services. The estimated monthly bill for scheduled maintenance and repairs is $86,900.00 or $1,042,800.00 per year. The City of Monterey will then reimburse the City of Seaside for the cost of the work.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution
2. Agreement for POMA Maintenance Services
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 94
RESOLUTION NO. 23-xx
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE
CITY OF MONTEREY TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION SUPPORT SERVICES TO
THE PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY ANNEX, AND AUTHORIZING THE
WITHDRAWAL FROM AND TERMINATION OF THE PRESIDIO PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey and the City of Seaside have been providing base installation maintenance and repairs services to the Army under the auspices of the Joint Powers Agency (“JPA”) known as the Presidio Municipal Services Agency (PMSA) since 1998; and
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2016, PMSA entered into the first Intergovernmental Support Agreement with the Army and the agreement, as amended, expires on March 31, 2023; and
WHEREAS, to increase efficiency the City of Monterey and City of Seaside plan to dissolve the PMSA Joint Powers Agreement and the City of Monterey will become the principal partner with the Army; and
WHEREAS, the Army and the City of Monterey have completed negotiation of a new IGSA, which shall be for a term not to exceed ten years; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey and the City of Seaside desire to enter into an agreement whereby City of Seaside remains a vital partner in performing installation support services and assumes the role as subcontractor to the City of Monterey for work performed at the Presidio of Monterey Annex (commonly known as the Ord Military Community); and
WHEREAS, it is estimated that the City of Seaside will perform $1.1 million annually in installation support services under the agreement; and WHEREAS, under the agreement, Monterey will not be obligated to pay Seaside until payment is received from the Army; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will terminate if the Intergovernmental Service Agreement (IGSA) terminates.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreement with the City of Packet Page 95
Monterey to provide installation support services to the Presidio of Monterey Annex on the Ord Military Community.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside authorizes the City Manager to, or his designee, to provide 60 days written notice of the City’s withdrawal from the Presidio Public Works Agency, also known as the Presidio Municipal Services Agency and/or consent to terminate the joint powers agency, and to execute all documents and take any steps necessary to fulfill this objective.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside, State of California, duly held on the 16th day of February 2023, by the following votes:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
City of Seaside
ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
City of Seaside
Packet Page 96
1 AGREEMENT REGARDING PUBLIC WORKS AND
MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY
The CITY OF MONTEREY (“Monterey”) and the CITY OF SEASIDE (“Seaside”) hereby enter into this Agreement (“Agreement”) regarding public works and maintenance services at the U.S. Army Garrison Presidio of Monterey, California (“USAG POM”). Both Monterey and Seaside are municipal corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of California.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, in 1997 Monterey and Seaside formed a joint powers agency known as the Presidio Public Works Agency, later renamed the Presidio Municipal Services Agency (“PMSA”), which had as its purpose to coordinate solicitation for proposals, acquire the contract for, and perform all aspects of work regarding the operation and maintenance at USAG POM and the Ord Military Community.
WHEREAS, the PMSA Joint Powers Agreement designated Monterey as the lead agency responsible for administering the agreement and implementing programs thereunder; WHEREAS, since 1998 USAG POM has received installation support services from the PMSA through Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FAR”) based contracts and, then more recently, through an Intergovernmental Support Agreement (“IGSA”). Generally, Seaside has been responsible for PMSA work occurring at the Ord Military Community and Monterey has been responsible for work at all other USAG POM facilities; WHEREAS, the existing IGSA between the United States and the PMSA expires on March 31, 2023, and Monterey and the United States are negotiating a new IGSA for installation support services at USAG POM going forward (the “2023 IGSA”); and WHEREAS, Monterey and Seaside believe it will increase efficiency and be administratively beneficial to dissolve the PMSA and for Monterey to contract directly with the United States to provide installation support services to USAG POM while continuing to collaborate with Seaside regarding the work located at the Ord Military Community (“OMC”).
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms provided herein, the parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1 . PURPOSE.
Seaside and Monterey border portions of OMC and USAG POM, respectively, and desire to continue to provide installation support services in the most efficient and effective manner possible. It is the intent of this Agreement that although the 2023 IGSA will be between Packet Page 97
2 Monterey and the United States, Monterey and Seaside will continue to collaborate regarding work at OMC.
SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; TERM.
This Agreement shall be effective upon the effective date of the 2023 IGSA between Monterey and the United States. This Agreement shall be for a term of ten (10) years unless the 2023 IGSA expires sooner, in which case this Agreement will automatically and simultaneously terminate. The initial Base Year of this Agreement shall be for one federal fiscal year from the execution of the 2023 IGSA.
SECTION 3. DUTIES OF MONTEREY.
(A) Proposal. It is the responsibility of Monterey to develop a technical and fee proposal for acquisition of the contract for base operations and maintenance at the USAG POM.
(B) Operations. Monterey will develop and implement guidelines to operate and to maintain USAG POM in accordance with the specifications and requirements as set forth in the IGSA.
(C) Notices to Proceed. Following the Base Year, Monterey will issue a Notice to Proceed to Seaside for OMC installation support services following notice from the Army of an intent to award the option for an additional year of performance under the 2023 IGSA.
(D) Project Work Orders. Monterey will promptly notify Seaside regarding Project Work Orders (“PWO”) issued by USAG POM for work at OMC. Seaside shall have the right of first refusal for PWO’s at OMC. However, if Seaside is unable or unwilling to perform the work, Monterey will perform and/or manage the PWO in question.
(E) Payment. Monterey will pay Seaside promptly upon receipt of payment for services rendered and accepted by USAG POM. Monterey has no obligation to pay Seaside until funds are received by Monterey from USAG POM.
SECTION 4. DUTIES OF SEASIDE.
(A) Installation Support Services at OMC. For the Base Year and for subsequent years following issuance of a Notice to Proceed by Monterey, Seaside shall perform the installation support services as stated in the 2023 IGSA for the OMC except for pest control, traffic engineering, and fire alarm services. The term “installation support services” broadly means those services, supplies, resources, and support typically provided by a local government for its own needs and without regard to whether such services, supplies, resources, and support are provided to its residents Packet Page 98
3 generally. When necessary, Monterey may combine or subdivide the categories to permit tracking of incremental direct costs. The following services are the primary services to be provided by Seaside to OMC pursuant to this Agreement.
1. Facilities Sustainment. The maintenance and repair activities necessary to keep facilities in the DOD real property inventory at OMC in good working order, including regularly scheduled adjustments and inspections, preventive maintenance tasks, and emergency response and service calls for minor repairs. Facilities sustainment also includes major repairs or replacement of facility components that are expected to occur periodically throughout the life cycle of a facility. Responsibility for funding facilities sustainment must be reflected in the Real Property Inventory database, including maintenance and repair of stormwater systems. This item includes maintenance and repair of the Army’s two signalized intersections.
2. Facilities Restoration and Repair. Restoration includes repair and replacement work to address facilities damage or degradation attributable to acts of nature, inadequate sustainment, excessive age, or other causes.
Repair is work as defined by 10 USC § 2811. Repair may include alteration of facilities to implement a new, higher standard or to replace building components that typically last more than 50 years.
3. Disposal and Demolition. The removal from the DOD real property inventory of obsolete or excess facilities, including buildings or any other permanent or temporary structure as well as pavements and other supporting infrastructure.
4. Pavement Clearance. Sand, mud, and debris removal from paved areas including streets, walkways and parking lots; and pavement sweeping of streets, parking lots, and walkways.
5. Real Property Management and Engineering. Facility management, administration, and installation engineering services including public works management, contract management, material procurement, facility data management, furnishings management, real estate management, annual inspection of facilities, master planning, overhead of planning and design, overhead of repair management, and non-sustainment and restoration modernization service calls.
6. Environmental Compliance. Actions to achieve and maintain compliance with federal, state, interstate, and local environmental requirements (other than restoration), including DOD policies, applicable binding agreements, and installation compliance plans.
7. Environmental Conservation. Actions to sustain and enhance natural and cultural resources thereby promoting mission capability and facilitating DOD access to air, lands, and waters.
8. Environmental Pollution Prevention. Actions to reduce pollutants, more efficiently use natural resources, recycle, and reduce emissions of toxic and other undesirable materials or wastes.
9. Environmental Restoration. Actions under the Defense Environmental Restoration Program and the Safe Drinking Water Act to address releases Packet Page 99
4 of contamination.
10. Project Management. Provide all aspects of project management to include inspection oversight of repair and service contracts performed by entities not part of this Agreement to ensure compliance with specifications, budgeted funds and completion dates.
11. Energy Management and Energy Project Development. Identification of energy savings and energy programs, development and implementation of energy savings projects and program and the collaborative setting and reporting of energy goals. Such energy management includes, but is not limited to, the use of Power Purchase Agreements, Solar, cogeneration, energy efficient boilers and other mechanical equipment, energy efficient lighting, interior and exterior, and Low Cost No Cost activities.
12. Maintenance - Surfaced and Unsurfaced Areas. Maintenance and repair of surfaced areas, including asphalt and cement concrete pavements, roadways, parking lots, trails, shoulders culverts, gravel and earth surfaced areas, and associated structures and appurtenances, range camps, and outlying areas, and associated structures.
13. Other Installation Support Services. Upon request and agreed to terms to be included in a Notice to Proceed, Seaside may provide the services below to OMC:
a. Custodial Services. The activities associated with cleaning installation facilities and purchase of cleaning supplies. Custodial services include activities such as carpet cleaning, window washing, and cleaning and stocking bathrooms.
b. Facility Construction and Major Repair. Includes minor construction, alterations, additions, and major repairs required to modernize, replace, expand or restore real property. Also, includes related planning and design.
c. Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping. Landscaping activities and plant and tree growth management of improved, semiimproved, and unimproved land. d. Master Planning. Analysis of existing installation footprint, future growth, impact on neighboring cities, coordination with applicable federal, state and local regulatory entities, public outreach to affected entities and implementation of any and all plans. e. Refuse Collection and Disposal. Includes all disposal operations, trash collection, and recycling operations (other than housing). f. Resource Management. Includes funds management, cost analysis services, and budget formulation, and reporting.
g. Supply services. Includes the provision of any common, generally expendable, non-technical commodity, material, or equipment (e.g., administrative office and housekeeping supplies, duplicating paper, common hardware, plumbing and electrical supplies, building materials, paint, and tools).
h. Utilities. Includes water, sewage, electricity, natural gas, and fuel oil services. Also, includes central generation and distribution of Packet Page 100
5 steam, chilled water, and compressed air.
i. Vehicle Support. Includes maintenance and repair of Governmentowned vehicles, and supply, maintenance and repair of vehicles provided for Government use.
(B) Project Work Orders.
1. Upon notification of a new PWO for work at OMC, Seaside will promptly inform Monterey as to whether Seaside will perform the PWO. Seaside may negotiate the terms and conditions of the PWO.
2. Seaside shall prepare detailed estimates of the labor, equipment and materials required to complete PWO work using industry accepted estimating procedures and data from R.S. Means, Building Construction Cost Data, or other appropriate estimating sources. Estimates shall be submitted electronically to Monterey or representatives of USAG POM. Estimates, supporting information, documentation, and calculations shall be available to Monterey upon request.
3. If Seaside will perform the PWO, it shall first provide proposals for all PWO work addressing the scope, performance schedule and proposed price. The proposal shall provide supporting data presented including labor, and other direct costs such as equipment, material, and subcontract estimates. Will submit Seaside’s proposal to the Army, which will evaluate Seaside's estimate to determine if: (1) the scope has been clearly and accurately identified, (2) the task hours have been properly estimated with supporting data presented, and (3) equipment, material, and subcontract estimates are reasonable and properly documented and provide recommendations to Monterey and the Army. Upon acceptance or negotiation of the proposed PWO, Seaside will be issued an executed PWO award.
4. The PWO project package requirements will include required project submittals dependent on the size and scope of the project, to include, but not limited to, schedule, design, safety, and quality control requirements. Seaside shall submit all designated preconstruction submittals to Monterey a minimum of fourteen (14) business days prior to the preconstruction conference or scheduled start of work. For all submittals, Seaside will receive written approval, rejection, or acceptance with comments. Seaside shall provide notification ten (10) business days prior to major project milestones and outages that will impact installation operations as determined in the preconstruction conference.
5. Seaside will obtain approval in writing from Monterey for PWO modification(s) before commencing or performing any work not contemplated or included in the scope of services and the amount of funding provided in the Order. Any work performed that has not received advance written approval from Monterey will be at the expense of the Seaside.
6. Upon written notification by Monterey, a PWO may be fully or partially Packet Page 101
6 terminated for the convenience of the United States. The Parties shall take all necessary action to mitigate impacts and all costs caused by the termination and to protect and preserve the property related to the PWO. (C) General Duties.
1. Seaside is independently responsible for its performance, contractual services, reporting, compliance, personnel management, and response to requests from Army personnel.
2. Seaside is responsible for data management, and data submission for entry into GFEBS, or to Monterey for informational purposes. Seaside will utilize a work order management system to track and manage the work performed under this Agreement.
3. Seaside will abide by the cost thresholds, order requirements, limitations and processes outlined in Appendix 1, Appendix 3, and Appendix 6, and any relevant Technical Exhibits of the 2023 IGSA.
4. Contractors. If Seaside provides services through a contractor, the contract must be awarded in accordance with Seaside’s procurement laws. Seaside will negotiate the most reasonable costs while also ensuring all discounts are applied. Seaside will ensure that any contractor performing work under this Agreement on behalf of Seaside, shall comply with the terms of this Agreement.
5. Billing. Seaside is responsible for generating billing statements to Monterey forty (40) days after the month end and ensuring these comply with Monterey’s financial requirements. Seaside is responsible for its annual true up of indirect costs.
6. Seaside will ensure any delays in the provision of services and/or any substandard quality is immediately remedied and handled in accordance with the Quality Control and Inspection procedures described in the 2023 IGSA and the applicable Notice to Proceed and/or PWO.
7. Seaside shall take measures to protect and not damage any property of the United States during performance of services. Should Seaside damage such property, Seaside may replace the item or restore it to its prior condition at its own cost or reimburse the United States for such costs. If Seaside does not take measures to replace or restore damaged property, Monterey reserves the right to deduct replacement or restoration costs from amounts billed by Seaside each month.
8. Seaside shall maintain as-built drawings. Seaside shall be provided one (1) copy of all applicable files (i.e. AutoCAD, GIS, etc.) in TE-1 Presidio of Monterey and sub-reporting location Maps, the maps to be provided are the following: Heating & Cooling System, Utility Systems, Building Control Systems, Fire Alarm Systems, and Installation Grounds. Utility repairs, component replacements, modifications, alterations, and additions to all systems and components shall be electronically redlined as well as on the hard copy maps upon completion of work. Seaside shall redline annotate all components replaced during the period of the agreement and annotate all Packet Page 102
7 items removed from service.
9. Seaside shall be exempt from federal labor statutes, provided employees are paid at wage grades or rates normally paid by Seaside to their employees, and Seaside complies with all applicable state and local labor laws and standards. Existing Seaside wage scales apply to Seaside employees rather than Davis-Bacon Act or Service Contract Act rates. In no event, however, shall any employee be paid at wage rate below the minimum wage established in the Fair Labor Standards Act.
10. Seaside shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local occupational safety and health requirements and standards. If Seaside has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute by its employees may delay or threaten to delay performance of this Agreement, Seaside shall immediately notify Monterey. Seaside shall provide timely updates until the dispute is resolved.
11. Seaside and all associated subcontractors’ employees shall comply with applicable installation, facility, and local security policies and procedures.
Seaside workforce shall comply with all personal identity verification (PIV) requirements as directed by DoD, Headquarters Department of the Army (HQDA), and local policy. Security matters or processes may be changed if the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) at any individual facility or installation changes.
SECTION 5. DUTIES OF BOTH PARTIES.
(A) Staff, which shall include at a minimum the General Services Superintendent and an Analyst, from Monterey and Seaside shall attend a monthly meeting in order to provide status updates on the work performed under this Agreement. The Parties shall identify and present any issues and concerns that could potentially impede successful performance of the 2023 IGSA in a timely and professional manner. (B) Promptly notify the other party of any concerns and communicate openly and transparently to ensure any concerns or issues are promptly dealt with in order to not impede performance under the 2023 IGSA. The Parties resolve to work out disputes to the extent feasible before initiating termination procedures. (C) Comply with public requests for information related to this IGSA pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §552 and state law. (D) To the extent permitted by the laws governing each party, the parties shall protect personal information and maintain the confidentiality of other exchanged information when requested to do so by the providing party.
SECTION 6. TERMINATION.
(A) Seaside recognizes the services provided under this Agreement are vital to the United States and must be continued without interruption and performed even in Packet Page 103
8 event of a dispute between the Parties.
(B) This Agreement may be terminated by mutual written agreement at any time. In the event of mutual termination, no rights, responsibilities, benefits, or liabilities shall accrue to either Party.
(C) Each Party reserves the right to terminate this Agreement for its convenience at any time. Each Party agrees to provide 90 days written notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement. When notified by the other Party of the termination, the Parties shall work cooperatively to mitigate impacts and all costs caused by the termination.
Seaside may be paid a percentage of the agreed price reflecting the percentage of work performed prior to the notice or the cost of re-competing the remaining requirement as is appropriate for the non-terminating Party. The Parties shall not be paid for any work performed or costs incurred that reasonably could have been avoided.
(D) The United States reserves the right to suspend performance of the 2023 IGSA, in whole or in part, or access to the installation in event of emergencies, mobilizations, national security reasons, or for other reasons outside the control of the United States. In the event of a suspension, Monterey will immediately notify Seaside and this Agreement will be suspended in parallel to the 2023 IGSA. Compensation for Seaside will continue for work not effected by the suspension.
SECTION 7. HOLD HARMLESS/INDEMNIFICATION.
Each party under this Agreement agrees to indemnify, defend and hold all other parties, their agencies, officers, and employees harmless from and against any and all costs, expenses or liability incurred as a result of any claim, suit, lien or other legal proceeding (including attorney's fees) against the party resulting from the performance or lack of performance of this Agreement.
SECTION 8. INSURANCE.
Each party recognizes and accepts the other party is self-insured. Either party may purchase commercial insurance to cover its exposure hereunder, in whole or in part.
SECTION 9. WARRANTY.
(A) Seaside warrants that work performed under this Agreement will conform to all applicable requirements in the 2023 IGSA and PWO’s issued under this Agreement, and is free of any defect in equipment, material, or design furnished, or workmanship performed by Seaside or any subcontractor or supplier. This warranty shall continue for a period of 1 year from the date of completion of the work. If USAG POM takes possession of any part of the work before final acceptance, this Packet Page 104
9 warranty shall continue for a period of 1 year from the date USAG POM takes possession or completion of an PWO.
(B) With respect to all warranties, express or implied, from subcontractors, manufacturers, or suppliers for work performed and materials furnished under this Agreement, Seaside shall obtain all warranties that would be given in normal commercial practice; require all warranties to be executed, in writing; and enforce all warranties for the benefit of USAG POM unless otherwise directed by the Monterey.
(C) Unless a defect is caused by the negligence of Seaside or subcontractor or supplier, Seaside shall not be liable for the repair of any defects of material or design furnished by USAG POM nor for the repair of any damage that results from any defect in Government-furnished material or design.
SECTION 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
(A) Amendment. All amendments must be in writing and signed by both Parties to be effective.
(B) Assignment. No Party may assign a right, claim, or interest it may have under this Agreement.
(C) Privileges and Immunities. All of the privileges and immunities from liability, exemptions laws, ordinances and rules, all pension, relief, disability, workers compensation and other benefits which apply to the activity of officers, agents or employees of either Monterey or Seaside when performing their respective functions within the territorial limits of their respective cities, shall apply to them to the same degree and extent while engaged in the performance of their functions and duties extraterritorially under the provisions of the Agreement. (D) Severability. If any portion, term, condition or provision of this Agreement is determined by a court to be illegal or in conflict with a law of the State of California, or is otherwise rendered unenforceable or ineffectual, the validity of the remaining portions, terms, conditions and provisions shall not be affected. (E) Choice of Law. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
(F) Compliance. The Parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, federal executive orders, and federal rules and regulations applicable to its performance under this Agreement. If any federal statute expressly prescribes policies or requirements that differ from the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the provisions of the statute shall govern.
(G) Standards of Conduct. Monterey and Seaside will ensure all personnel present a Packet Page 105
10 professional appearance while working on the Government installation. All employees shall observe and comply with all local laws, regulations, policies and procedures concerning fire, safety, environmental protection, sanitation, security, possession of firearms or other lethal or illegal weapons or substance. Seaside and Monterey shall ensure all employees, providing services under this Agreement, conduct themselves and perform services in a professional, safe, responsible and non-discriminatory manner. Seaside and Monterey shall inform their employees who have their primary worksite at the Presidio of Monterey, USASA POM Enclave, and OMC, of the Army’s policy regarding prohibited relationships with entry-level training military students in accordance with guidelines and training materials provided by the Army. Seaside and Monterey shall ensure that their employees do not conduct political related activities or events on the installation.
Personnel who violate the DOD, Army and DLIFLC regulations and policies may be barred entry from military installations. Seaside shall remove from the job site, any employee or contractor for reasons of misconduct or security threat. The removal or bar of any Seaside employee or contractor from the Government installation shall not relieve Seaside of the requirement to provide personnel to perform adequate and timely service. Seaside shall replace any employees or contractors barred or removed from USAG-POM or OMC at Seaside’s cost. (H) Nondiscrimination. Seaside agrees not to discriminate against any employee based upon race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or sexual orientation, or to allow any employee to engage in discriminatory practices or conduct while performing work under this Agreement. Additionally, Seaside shall not permit employees which engage in sexual assault, sexual harassment, or trafficking to perform services under this Agreement. Seaside shall not engage in age discrimination and shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act with respect to the hiring and accommodation of employees performing services under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the _____ day of _______, 20___.
ATTEST CITY OF MONTEREY
City Clerk City Manager
ATTEST CITY OF SEASIDE
Dominique D. Davis, City Clerk Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager Packet Page 106
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.G.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Nisha Patel, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Dave Fortune, Maintenance and Utilities Superintendent
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A MAINTENANCE
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HOPE SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $137,046.00
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with HOPE Services to assist with maintenance in City parks and public areas for an amount not to exceed $137,046.00.
BACKGROUND
HOPE Services (HOPE) is a local non-profit organization engaged in the training of persons with disabilities to enter the mainstream workforce. Since 2001, Hope Services has provided the City with public works maintenance assistance and has proven to be an invaluable asset. In turn, the City has provided experience and opportunities for persons with disabilities. HOPE maintains the City parks by removing trash, abating graffiti, opening, closing and cleaning restrooms and provides additional litter control on Coe Avenue, General Jim Moore Blvd., Monterey Road and alleyways.
There are twenty-three (23) parks and other public areas in the City that have benefited from the successful partnership with HOPE. It has allowed the city’s Parks staff to concentrate on beautification projects and maintenance and repair of the irrigation system and has reduced staff overtime.
The attached contract provides for four (4) workers and one (1) supervisor by HOPE to provide maintenance/cleanup tasks in and around public facilities. The HOPE crew is scheduled to work six and a half hours (6.5 hrs) per day from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. with a half hour lunch break, Monday through Friday. The work performed by HOPE is Packet Page 107
Item No. 8.G. Page 2 of 2
under the direction of the city’s Maintenance and Utilities Superintendent. The core objective required to be performed by the Hope crew is the cleaning of litter at each park once a week. HOPE’s supervisor is also responsible for tracking the amount of litter removed by the clean-up of parks as part of the required documentation for the city’s Storm Water Management Program.
Staff recommends the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a one-year Maintenance Services Agreement with HOPE Services for an amount not to exceed $137,046.00.
FISCAL IMPACT
The HOPE fees are distributed from the following fund sources: Stormwater Fund (271) and Parks (100). Based on the time provided for each aspect of the work provided, each of these funds will be charged accordingly for a total agreement amount not to exceed $137,046.00. HOPE has been working continuously for the City for over 20 years and, since July, has been working without an agreement in good faith.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution
2. Maintenance Services Agreement
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 108
RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING A MAINTENANCE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH HOPE
SERVICES
WHEREAS, HOPE Services is a local non-profit organization engaged in the training of persons with disabilities to enter the mainstream workforce; and WHEREAS, the City of Seaside has maintained a successful partnership with HOPE Services for over twenty years; and
WHEREAS, HOPE Services would provide maintenance/clean-up tasks at each park location and public areas on a weekly basis, opening closing and cleaning the restrooms in addition to tracking the amount of litter removed by the clean-up of parks as part of the required documentation for the City Storm Water Management Program; and
WHEREAS, these services performed by Hope Services have reduced staff overtime and have allowed city staff to concentrate on beautification projects and maintenance and repair of the irrigation systems; and
WHEREAS, HOPE Services and the City have agreed to a one-year contract.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside authorizes the City Manager to execute a maintenance service agreement with HOPE Services to perform park and public maintenance services for an amount not to exceed $137,046.00.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside, State of California, duly held on the 16th day of February 2023, by the following votes:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_______________________________
Ian Oglesby, Mayor
City of Seaside
ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique D. Davis, City Clerk
City of Seaside
Packet Page 109
Packet Page 110
Packet Page 111
Packet Page 112
Packet Page 113
Packet Page 114
Packet Page 115
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.H.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Nisha Patel, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Melissa Savage, Assistant Engineer
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION OF
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT FOR FERNANDO PARK FROM
FRIENDS OF SEASIDE PARKS; AMENDING THE CAPITAL
PROGRAM TO INCLUDE THE FERNANDO PARK IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT; APPROPRIATING A BUDGET OF $80,000.00 TO THE
PROJECT FROM GENERAL FUND; AND AUTHORIZING A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WHITSON
ENGINEERS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $42,770.00 FOR
THE PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution: accepting a donation for playground equipment at Fernando Park from Friends of Seaside Parks; amending the Capital Program to include the Fernando Park Improvement Project; appropriating $80,000.00 for design and construction of the project from the General Fund; and authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Whitson Engineers for an amount not to exceed $42,770.00 to provide design and construction support services for the project.
BACKGROUND
Fernando Park is located on the 1700 block of Fernando Street, between San Pablo Avenue and Mingo Street. The park currently includes paths, low rock walls, a bench, and some landscaping. Friends of Seaside Parks Association (FOSPA) volunteers applied for and were granted $25,000.00 from Sunlight Giving to purchase play equipment for Fernando Park. The play equipment FOSPA volunteers chose (attachment 2) included two swings, a sea horse coil spring rider, and an artificial rock for climbing. The project also includes a hand sanitizer station, a picnic table, and play equipment installation costs. Design services, site preparation, construction management, picnic table Packet Page 116
Item No. 8.H. Page 2 of 3
installation, and inspections are necessary to complete this project.
In December 2022, staff requested a proposal from Whitson Engineers to prepare design plans and specifications for the improvements at Fernando Park. On February 7, 2023, Whitson Engineers provided a proposal to perform design and construction support services for the project in the amount not to exceed $42,770.00. The proposal includes a topographic survey; design including site plan, demolition plan, layout plan, grading and drainage plans, and construction details, specifications and cost estimates; and bid and construction phase support.
The cost for the design, construction, construction management, inspection and testing for the project is roughly estimated to cost $170,000.00. The playground equipment will be paid for by FOSPA with the grant. As a partner with FOSPA, the Neighborhood Improvement Committee (NIC), at their meeting on February 7, 2023, approved allocating $90,000.00 of their fiscal year 2022/23 funds to the project. Therefore, the additional funding needed is $80,000.00.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301: Existing Facilities Class 1 exemptions consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use. The proposed project would consist of installation of play equipment and associated site furnishings which would not impact the expansion or modification of the existing park. Therefore, there are no significant impacts associated with the installation of play equipment and the project is exempt from CEQA.
FISCAL IMPACT
The professional services agreement with Whitson Engineers for design and construction support services for Fernando Park is in the amount of $42,770.00. A contingency amount of $7,230, approximately 15% of the agreement amount, results in a total potential agreement value of $50,000.00.
Staff recommends adopting a resolution: accepting a donation for playground equipment at Fernando Park from FOSPA; amending the Capital Program to include the Fernando Park Improvement Project; appropriating $80,000.00 to the project from General Fund; and authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Whitson Engineers for an amount not to exceed $42,770.00 and written amendments such that the total agreement does not exceed $50,000.00. Staff will be requesting that $90,000.00 of NIC funds be transferred to the project in a separate Council Item on March 2, 2023.
Packet Page 117
Item No. 8.H. Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution
2. Rendering and Layout Concept
3. Professional Services Agreement
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 118
RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE
ACCEPTING DONATION OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT FOR FERNANDO PARK FROM FRIENDS OF SEASIDE PARKS; AMENDING THE CAPITAL PROGRAM TO INCLUDE THE FERNANDO PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; APPROPRIATING A BUDGET OF $80,000.00 TO THE PROJECT FROM THE GENERAL FUND; AND
AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WHITSON ENGINEERS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $42,770.00 FOR THE PROJECT WHEREAS, the Fernando Park Improvements Project includes the addition of a swing sea horse coil swing rider, artificial rock for climbing, hand sanitizer station, and picnic table at the park; and
WHEREAS, the Fernando Park Improvements Project is currently not in the fiscal year 2022/23 City capital improvement budget and program; and WHEREAS, on October 20¸2022, Friends of Seaside Parks (FOSPA) was awarded a Sunlight Giving Grant in the amount of $25,000.00 for park equipment; and WHEREAS, FOSPA will be purchasing the park equipment and donating it to City for Fernando Park; and
WHEREAS, design services, construction, construction management, picnic table and bench installation, and inspections and testing are necessary to complete the project; and
WHEREAS, staff requested a proposal from Whitson Engineers to provide design and construction support services for the Fernando Park Improvements Project; and WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023, Whitson Engineers provided a proposal to provide design and construction support services for Fernando Park in the amount not to exceed $42,770.00; and
WHEREAS, the Whitson Engineers proposal includes a topographic survey, design including site plan, demolition plan, layout plan, grading and drainage plans, construction details, specifications, and cost estimates; and bid support and construction phase support; and
Packet Page 119
WHEREAS, Whitson Engineers has prepared design plans and provided construction support for parks for numerous other agencies in the Bay Area; and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the scope of work and fee in the proposal, and finds it acceptable; and
WHEREAS, an amount of $7,230 contingency, approximately 15% of the contract value, should be authorized on an as required basis for a potential total agreement value of $50,000.00; and
WHEREAS, the cost for the design, construction, construction management, inspection, and testing for the project is roughly estimated to cost $170,000.00; and WHEREAS, the Neighborhood Improvement Committee, at their meeting on February 7, 2023, approved allocating $90,000.00 of their fiscal year 2022/23 funds to the project; and
WHEREAS, a budget appropriation of $80,000.00 is needed to fully fund design and construction of the project; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside accepts a donation for playground equipment at Fernando Park from FOSPA; amends the Capital Improvement Program to include the Fernando Park Improvements Project; appropriates $80,000.00 to the project from the General Fund; and authorizes the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Whitson Engineers for an amount not to exceed $42,770.00 and written amendments such that the total agreement value does not exceed $50,000.00.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular City Council meeting of the City of Seaside duly held on the 16th day of February 2023 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
Packet Page 120
___________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
Packet Page 121
Packet Page 122
Packet Page 123
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS
Rev. 1/18 Page 1 COS Design PSA
CITY OF SEASIDE
DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
FOR FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMPROVEMENTS
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective February 16, 2023, between the City of Seaside, a municipal corporation ("Agency") and Whitson Engineers, a corporation (”Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on the effective date above and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than July 30, 2023, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES
Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE
Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his/her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. AGENCY MANAGEMENT
Agency’s City Engineer shall represent Agency in all matters pertaining to the administration of this Agreement, review and approval of all products submitted by Consultant, but not including the authority to enlarge the Tasks to Be Performed or change the compensation due to Consultant. Agency’s City Manager shall be authorized to act on Agency's behalf and to execute all necessary documents which enlarge the Tasks to Be Performed or change Consultant's compensation, subject to Section 5 hereof.
5. PAYMENT
Packet Page 124
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS
Rev. 1/18 Page 2 COS Design PSA
(a) The Agency agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed FOURTY TWO THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND SEVENTY DOLLARS ($42,770.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
(b) Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the Agency City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by Agency City Manager and Consultant at the time Agency's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services.
(c) Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, or as soon thereafter as practical, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the Agency disputes any of Consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE (a) The Agency may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the Agency suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
(b) In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the Agency shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the Agency. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.
7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT
(a) The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the Packet Page 125
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS
Rev. 1/18 Page 3 COS Design PSA
terms of this Agreement, Agency shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. (b) If the Agency Manager or his/her delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he/she shall cause to be served upon the Consultant a written notice of the default.
The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the Agency shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
(a) Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts, and other such information required by Agency that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of Agency or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records; shall give Agency the right to examine and audit said books and records; shall permit Agency to make transcripts therefrom as necessary; and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
(b) Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, computer discs, and reports prepared by the Contractor under this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused, or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of Contractor. With respect to computer files, Contractor shall make available to City, at City's office and upon reasonable written request by City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring, and printing computer files.
9. INDEMNITY AND DEFENSE
Packet Page 126
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS
Rev. 1/18 Page 4 COS Design PSA
(a) Indemnification and Defense for Professional Services To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Agency and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees and costs, to the extent they arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. Consultant’s duty to defend shall consist of reimbursement of defense costs incurred by Agency in direct proportion to the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.
Consultant’s percentage of fault shall be determined, as applicable, by a court of law, jury or arbitrator. In the event any loss, liability or damage is incurred by way of settlement or resolution without a court, jury or arbitrator having made a determination of the Consultant’s percentage of fault, the parties agree to mediation with a third party neutral to determine the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault for purposes of determining the amount of indemnity and defense cost reimbursement owed to the Agency.
(b) For All Other Liabilities
Notwithstanding the foregoing and without diminishing any rights of Agency under Section 9.A, for any liability, claim, demand, allegation against Agency arising out of, related to, or pertaining to any act or omission of Consultant, but which is not a design professional service, Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Agency, its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorney fees and expert witness fees), judgments, settlements, and/or arbitration awards, whether for personal or bodily injury, property damage, or economic injury, and arising out of, related to, any concurrent or contributory negligence on the part of the Agency, except for the sole or active negligence of, or willful misconduct of the Agency.
10. INSURANCE
Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit B attached to and part of this Agreement.
11. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT
Packet Page 127
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS
Rev. 1/18 Page 5 COS Design PSA
(a) Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the Agency a wholly independent Consultant. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither Agency nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers, employees, or agents of the Agency. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatever against Agency, or bind Agency in any manner. (b) No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, Agency shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for Agency. Agency shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES
The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The Agency, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this Section.
13. UNDUE INFLUENCE
Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure is used against or in concert with any officer or employee of the Agency in connection with the award, terms or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of the Agency will receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from Consultant, or from any officer, employee or agent of Consultant, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling the City to any and all remedies at law or in equity.
14. NO BENEFIT TO ARISE TO LOCAL EMPLOYEES
No member, officer, or employee of Agency, or their designees or agents, and no public official who exercises authority over or responsibilities with respect to the Project during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, Packet Page 128
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS
Rev. 1/18 Page 6 COS Design PSA
direct or indirect, in any agreement or sub-agreement, or the proceeds thereof, for work to be performed in connection with the Project performed under this Agreement.
15. RELEASE OF INFORMATION/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
(a) All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without Agency's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants, shall not without written authorization from the Agency Manager or unless requested by the Agency Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories, or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the Agency.
Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives Agency notice of such court order or subpoena. (b) Consultant shall promptly notify Agency should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions, or other discovery request, court order, or subpoena from any person or party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the Agency. Agency retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing, or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with Agency and to provide the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, Agency's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by Agency to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
16. NOTICES
Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by notice:
To Agency: __City of Seaside__________
__440 Harcourt Ave________
__Seaside, CA 93955_______
Packet Page 129
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS
Rev. 1/18 Page 7 COS Design PSA
Attention: City Clerk
To Consultant: _Whitson Engineers________
_6 Harris Court____________
_Monterey, CA 93940_______
17. ASSIGNMENT
The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the Agency. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Nathaniel Milam, PE shall be the Project Manager and Engineer of Record for the services described in this Agreement.
The consultant may use assistants, under its direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide Agency fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Nathaniel Milam, PE from Consultant's employ. Should he/she leave Consultant's employ, the Agency shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the Governing Board and the Consultant.
18. LICENSES
At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.
19. GOVERNING LAW
The Agency and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the Agency.
20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the Packet Page 130
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS
Rev. 1/18 Page 8 COS Design PSA
representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
21. WORK SCHEDULED/TIME OF COMPLETION
Consultant shall perform all services in a timely manner.
22. CONTENTS OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND PROPOSAL
Consultant is bound by the contents of Agency's Request for Proposal, Exhibit "C" hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and the contents of the proposal submitted by the Consultant, Exhibit "A" hereto. In the event of conflict, the requirements of Agency's Request for Proposals and this Agreement shall take precedence over those contained in the Consultant's proposals.
23. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT
The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he/she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.
CONSULTANT: _Whitson Engineers_______
By: ______________________________ Date:_________________ Richard Weber, PE, PLS, QSD
Principal
City of Seaside
A Municipal Corporation
______________________________ Date:_________________
Jaime Fontes, City Manager
Attachments: Exhibit A Scope of Work/Consultant Proposal Exhibit B Insurance Requirements
Exhibit C Request for Proposal – Engineering Services
Packet Page 131
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK/CONSULTANT PROPOSAL
Packet Page 132
2071.33 proposal r1.doc
Revised February 7, 2023 Project No.: 2071.33
Melissa Savage
Assistant Engineer
City of Seaside, Public Works
440 Harcourt Ave.
Seaside, CA 93955
Re: Fernando Park Playground Improvements
Proposal for Land Surveying and Civil Engineering Services Dear Ms. Savage:
Thank you for the opportunity to make this proposal. We understand that the City requests us to provide Surveying, Civil Engineering and Landscape Architecture Services for improvements to Fernando Park. Based on our phone call on January 3, 2023, we understand the scope of work may include:
• Three pieces of play equipment
• Engineered wood chip play area surfacing
• Play area border improvements, including potentially modification of the existing rock walls
• Walkway from Fernando Street to the play area
Based on our understanding of the project, we propose the following scope of work:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Topographic Survey
1. Conduct a limited topographic survey of the area shown on the attached Survey Limits exhibit.
2. Prepare an existing conditions map for the survey area. The map will include existing grade contours at 1’ contour interval, observed surface utilities, storm drainage structures (including inverts), and hardscape including curb, gutter, sidewalk, fences, and walls.
3. Request utility maps for the project area from utility owners. Incorporate the provided utility information into the project existing conditions map.
Design Phase
1. Coordinate with the city regarding the proposed design and develop a Concept Plan and Cost Estimate.
2. Following City review of the Concept Design, develop 75% (Draft) PS&E.
Anticipated plan sheets are:
A. Title Sheet (WE)
B. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (WE)
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 133
February 7, 2023 | Job No. 2071.33
Fernando Park Playground Improvements
t:\monterey projects\2071.33 fernando park\2071.33 proposal r1.doc Page | 2 C. Site Plan (SSA)
D. Demolition Plan (WE)
E. Layout Plan (SSA)
F. Grading and Drainage Plan (WE)
G. Construction Details (SSA)
3. Estimate earthwork volumes based on the Grading and Drainage Plan.
4. Following City review of the 75% submittal, develop and submit 100% (Bid Set) PS&E.
Concept Design Deliverables: Concept plan and estimate in PDF format. 75% PS&E Deliverables: Plans in PDF format; Cost Estimate in MS Excel format; Technical Specifications in MS Word format.
100% (Bid Set) Deliverables: Signed PDF of plans and technical specifications.
Original editable (AutoCAD, Word and Excel) copies of plans, specs, and estimate.
Please see the attached proposal by SSA Landscape Architects for detailed Landscape scope and deliverables.
Bid and Construction Phase Support
1. Provide civil engineering design assistance during bidding as requested. We have included the following in our budget estimate:
a. Written responses to Bidder Inquiries – 2 hours
2. Provide civil engineering design assistance during construction as requested. We have included the following in our allowance for this Task:
a. Site visits – 4 hours
b. Written responses to Contractor’s Material Submittals – 2 hours c. Written responses to Requests for Information – 2 hours
3. Provide landscape architecture design assistance during bidding and construction as requested. See the proposal by SSA Landscape Architects for detailed scope and allowance.
Assumptions
1. All our work products will be provided electronically; no paper copies will be required.
2. The Project will not improve the existing walkway from Mescal Street and will not modify or improve the existing sidewalk or parking on Fernando Street. We understand the City has discussed site access and on-street accessible parking specifically with the city’s ADA Coordinator.
3. Due to the high R-values of the soils typically found within the city, we will assume the existing street subgrade soils are R=40 for vehicular pavement design.
4. Due to the scope of work, the project will not be subject to a Building Permit. City reviews will be performed in-house. We will not need to respond to third-party building permit plan check comments.
5. City will provide any available record drawings prior to the beginning of design.
6. Geotechnical investigation and report are not required.
7. The project will create/replace less than 2,500 s.f. of impervious surface, therefore the project will not be subject to the Post-Construction Requirements.
8. The project will disturb less than 1 acre of soil, therefore the project will not require a SWPPP.
9. Landscape and irrigation will not be part of the construction documents; landscaping and irrigation will be done separately by FOSPA.
Packet Page 134
February 7, 2023 | Job No. 2071.33
Fernando Park Playground Improvements
t:\monterey projects\2071.33 fernando park\2071.33 proposal r1.doc Page | 3
10. The City will provide a Construction Manager.
Exclusions
The following work is specifically excluded from the Engineer’s Scope of Services:
1. Underground utility mapping and locating
2. Utility relocation design
3. Preparation of a Storm Water Control Plan or SWPPP
4. Obtaining or coordinating permits, permit condition compliance
5. Geotechnical Investigations or Engineering
6. Structural engineering (which includes retaining wall design)
7. Electrical engineering
8. Lighting/Electrical/Mechanical Design Services
9. Attendance of meetings other than those specifically included in the Scope of Work
10. Environmental studies, CEQA documentation
11. Certified Access Specialist (CASp) review
12. Preparation of a Construction Management Plan and/or plans for disposal of excess soil
13. Construction staking
14. Construction management, monitoring, inspections, and testing
15. Plan revisions to reflect field changes; as-built plan preparation PAYMENT AND PROVISIONS:
We propose to do the above work on a Time and Materials basis. Our proposed Not to Exceed Fee is $42,770. A breakdown of this estimate is provided in the attached Time and Materials Estimate. Additional Services, if requested, will also be performed on a Time and Materials basis.
If you have any questions or need more information, please contact me at (831) 649- 5225.
Sincerely,
Nathaniel Milam, PE, QSD
Senior Civil Engineer
for
Richard Weber PE, LS, QSD | Principal
RCE 55219, LS 8002, QSD 20534
Packet Page 135
Fernando Park Playground Improvements
Time and Materials Estimate
2/7/2023 NDM T41
Topographic Survey
PE SCE LS AE AE2 1P 2P
Rate: $ 240 $ 195 $ 175 $ 150 $ 130 $ 210 $ 350 Hours Cost 1 Conduct Topographic Survey 4 4 $ 840
2 Prepare Topo Map 2 4 6 $ 950
3 Request and Incorporate Utility Maps 2 2 $ 300
-- Project Management, QA/QC 1 1 2 4 $ 785
Subtotal: 1 1 4 6 0 4 0 16 $ 2,875
Professional Personnel Estimate: $ 2,875
Estimated Expenses: $ -
Total Estimate, Topographic Survey: $ 2,875
Design Phase
PE SCE LS AE AE2 1P 2P
Rate: $ 240 $ 195 $ 175 $ 150 $ 130 $ 210 $ 350 Hours Cost 1 Concept Plan 2 2 $ 390
2A 75% Plans - Title Sheet 1 1 $ 150
2B 75% Plans - ESCP 1 1 $ 150
2D 75% Plans - Demolition Plan 4 4 $ 600
2F 75% Plans - G&D Plan 2 4 6 $ 990
2 75% Estimate 2 2 $ 390
3 Earthwork 1 1 2 $ 345
4A 100% Civil Plans 2 4 6 $ 990
4B 100% Estimate 2 2 $ 390
4C 100% Specifications 2 4 6 $ 990
-- Project Management, QA/QC 2 4 6 $ 1,260
Subtotal: 2 17 0 19 0 0 0 38 $ 6,645
Professional Personnel Estimate: $ 6,645
Subconsultant (SSA Landscape Architects): $ 22,532
10% Administrative Fee: $ 2,253
Estimated Expenses: $ 550
Total Estimate, Construction Documents: $ 31,980
Bid and Construction Phase Support
PE SCE LS AE AE2 1P 2P
Rate: $ 240 $ 195 $ 175 $ 150 $ 130 $ 210 $ 350 Hours Cost 1 Bid Phase Design Support 2 2 $ 390
2 Construction Phase Design Support 4 4 8 $ 1,380
3 Landscape Architecture Design Support (by SSA) 0 $ -
-- Project Management 4 4 $ 780
Subtotal: 0 10 0 4 0 0 0 14 $ 2,550
Professional Personnel Estimate: $ 2,550
Subconsultant (SSA Landscape Architects): $ 4,877
10% Administrative Fee: $ 488
Estimated Expenses: $ -
Total Estimate, Bid and Construction Phase Support: $ 7,915 Total Estimate: $ 42,770
Total, Whitson Engineers 12,070
Total, SSA Landscape Architects 27,409
Total, 10% Administrative Fee 2,741
Total, Reimbursable Expenses 550
Totals
Totals
Totals
2/7/2023 Page 1 2071.33 Estimate r1.xls
Packet Page 136
Survey Limits
Walkway from Mescal Street is not
included in survey limits
Survey limits
Packet Page 137
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR FERNANDO PARK –
CITY OF SEASIDE – REV. 1
February 06, 2023
Melissa Savage
Assistant Engineer
Public Works, City of Seaside
440 Harcourt Avenue, Seaside, CA 93955
A. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
This scope of work is based on information gathered from the correspondence with Melissa Savage at the City of Seaside Public Works Department (hereinafter referred to as CITY). The scope of this Project includes site analysis; conceptual design; plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E); and bid and construction phase services for the development of Fernando Park at 1740 Fernando Street in Seaside, CA.
Potential program elements defined by the CITY include the installation of three new playground structures within the existing park footprint; installation of loose‐fill safety surfacing at the playground; potential modification of existing rock walls to allow for accessible path of travel between play elements; All planting, irrigation, and site furnishing improvements are excluded from this scope of work.
SSA Landscape Architects, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as SSA) will develop Concept through Construction Administration services work with the project team and project manager from the CITY through all phases of the project.
B. SCOPE OF WORK
PHASE ONE – CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
a. Collect and review topographic survey and all available background documents. b. Attend a kick‐off meeting with the CITY to discuss the project goals and program. c. Based on CITY input, prepare a Conceptual Design illustrating all proposed elements of park improvements.
d. Prepare a ROM level Estimate of Probable Construction Costs. e. Meet with the CITY to review conceptual design plans and Estimate of Probable Construction Costs.
f. Revise Conceptual Design based on input from the CITY and submit Final Conceptual Design and Estimate of Probable Construction Costs for CITY approval.
PHASE ONE DELIVERABLES
(1) Preliminary Conceptual Plan and Estimate of Probable Construction Costs. (1) Final Conceptual Plan and Estimate of Probable Construction Costs.
Packet Page 138
Fernando Park
Landscape Architectural Services Rev. 1
Scope of Work – P23001.00
February 06, 2023
PHASE TWO – 75% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
a. Prepare Design Development documents (75% Construction Documents) for the selected improvements based on the CITY approved conceptual design and Phase One feedback.
Documents are anticipated to include the following elements:
i.Site Plan
ii.Layout Plan
iii.Construction Details
iv.Draft Technical Specifications
v.Estimate of Probable Construction Cost.
b. Conduct in‐house plan check prior to submittal and incorporate revisions to meet all applicable law, regulations, CITY Standards, and other applicable requirements. c. Submit one electronic copy of the 75% PS&E to CITY for review and comment. d. After review period by CITY, meet with CITY to review plan check comments for incorporation into final Construction Documents.
e. Coordinate Technical Specifications with CITY’s front‐end specifications. Preparation of front‐end specifications by CITY.
f. Allow for (1) meeting via video conferencing during this phase to collaborate, coordinate or review design, construction, and budget of schedule issues. g. Coordinate and liaise with CITY throughout this phase via phone conferences and emails.
PHASE TWO DELIVERABLES
75% PS&E (1 PDF set)
(1) CITY document review meetings at the CITY
(1) CITY coordination meetings
PHASE THREE – BID SET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
a. Meet with City via video conferencing to review comments b. Prepare and submit Final PS&E for bidding.
PHASE THREE DELIVERABLES
Final Bid Set PS&E (1 PDF set)
PHASE FOUR: CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
a. Provide plan clarification and responses to RFIs throughout the construction period as requested by the CITY.
b. Attend (1) one site construction meetings as requested by the CITY. Meeting agendas, minutes, and coordination by others.
c. Review submittals, shop drawings, and provide written approval, rejection, or correction directives.
d. Review RFI’s/COs and make recommendations to the CITY, if necessary.
Packet Page 139
Fernando Park
Landscape Architectural Services Rev. 1
Scope of Work – P23001.00
February 06, 2023
e. Conduct (1) one pre‐final acceptance and prepare punch list, if necessary.
PHASE FOUR DELIVERABLES
(1) One site construction meetings
Punch walk and list
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
SSA may provide additional services, as requested in advance by CITY. Additional services will be negotiated separately based on the billing rates contained in the attached Exhibit B “SSA Rate Schedule”. Additional services may include, but are not limited to:
1. Preparation of SWPPP, QSP or QSD documents
2. Providing cost estimating or value engineering other than those described within this Scope of Work, including exhaustive reformatting or itemizing for differing funding or phasing needs of the CITY
3. Attendance at any meetings not listed above
4. Meeting minutes
5. Additive or deductive alternates within the bidding documents beyond what is provided for in the Scope of Work
6. Procurement of additional subconsultants beyond what is provided for in the Scope of Work including: Electrical Engineer, Playground inspection.
7. Structural or Geotechnical subconsultants
8. Bid Phase services
9. Any other service not described within this Scope of Work
FEE PROPOSAL
The fees for the above Scope of Work phases are as follows:
Phase One – Conceptual Design $6,856.00
Phase Two – Construction Documents $ 11,703.00
Phase Three – Bid Set Construction Documents $ 3,973.00 Phase Five – Construction Administration $ 4,877.00
Total Proposed In‐House Fees $ 27,409.00
Estimated reimbursable expenses $ 550.00
Total Proposed Fees $ 27,959.00
These services are proposed to be provided on a Time and Material basis. Fees will be billed monthly based on the actual effort and expense of each phase.
SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
1. All Project related drawings, surveys and reports, including, but not limited to, those requested in this Scope of Work
2. CLIENT review, comment and directives as requested by SSA
3. Procurement of any subconsultant that may be identified as necessary during the Project
Packet Page 140
Fernando Park
Landscape Architectural Services Rev. 1
Scope of Work – P23001.00
February 06, 2023
4. Submittal to any necessary agencies for review and approval, including to the CITY
5. Front‐end specification preparation
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Included in the FEE PROPOSAL is an allowance for expenses such as mileage, plotting, printing and reproduction, shipping and postage. Billings for reimbursable expenses will be submitted on or around the 25th of each month based on the actual cost for the previous month, per the attached “SSA Rate Schedule”.
Packet Page 141
a Review background documents 1 2
b Attend Kick-off Meeting 1
c Prepare conceptual design 2 16
d Prepare conceptual design estimate of construction cost 1 6 e Meet with City to review 1
f Revise Conceptual Design based on input from CITY 28
0 8 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 $6,856
a Prepare Design Development documents
i. Site Plan 2 8
ii. Layout Plan 1 8
iii. Construction Details 4 8
iv. Draft Tech Specs 1 6 4
v. Estimate probable construction costs 1 4
b Conduct in-house plan check 6
c Submit electronic copy of CD to CITY 1
d Meet with City after review period 1 1
e Coordinate tech specs with CITY 2
f Allow for (1) one online meetings to coordinate 1 1
g Coordiate and liase with County via phone/email 2 4
0 19 0 0 0 0 43 0 4 0 $11,703
a Meet with CITY to review comments 1 2
b Prepare and submit Final PS&E for bidding 4 16
0 5 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 $3,973
a Provide plan clarification 1 4
b Attend (1) one site construction meetings 3
c Review submittals, provide direction 1 6
d Review RFI's/COs and make recommendations 1 6
e Conduct (1) one pre-final acceptance walk 3 2
0 9 0 0 0 0 16 0 2 0 $4,877
Hours: 0 41 0 0 0 0 109 0 6 0
Rate: $248 $233 $225 $215 $209 $164 $156 $149 $142 $111 Extension: $0 $9,553 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,004 $0 $852 $0
27409 $27,409
Estimated Reimbursable Expenses
$500 Multiplier 1.10 $550
$27,959
The above breakdown represents our best estimate at this time and may change subject to future developments during the project. It is possible that some of the estimated manpower requirements for specific task items may increase, while others may not require the entire anticipated effort. This provides us a greater degree of confidence in the overall project estimate, rather than in any given task.
Project Totals for In-house Staff
Reimbursable Expenses
Phase Three Total
Phase Four: Construction Phase Services
Phase Five Total
Total Project Phase Services Fees
Phase One: Conceptual Design
Phase Two: 75% Construction Documents
Senior Project Manager
Phase Three: Bid Set Construction Documents
Phase One Total
Phase Two Total
PrincipalProject Manager IILandscape Designer II/AutoCad TechLandscape Designer l /AutoCAD TechAdmin Assistant
BASIC SERVICES
Associate PrincipalJob Captain/Landscape Architect IILandscape Architect l Proposal No. P23001.00 Rev.1
Date: 02-06-23
Detailed Breakdown of Landscape Architectural Services for City of Seaside for
Fernando Park
Director of Design
SSA Landscape Architects, Inc.
Project Name
Proposal Number
2/6/2023
Packet Page 142
EXHIBIT B
STANDARD BILLING RATE SCHEDULE
Effective through December 31, 2023
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Principal Landscape Architect $248.00/Hour
Associate Principal $233.00/Hour
Senior Project Manager $225.00/Hour
Project Manager II $209.00/Hour
Project Manager I $185.00/Hour
Job Captain/Landscape Architect II $164.00/Hour
Landscape Architect I $156.00/Hour
Landscape Designer III $152.00/Hour
Landscape Designer II/AutoCAD Technician $149.00/Hour
Landscape Designer I $142.00/Hour
Staff Clerical/Administrative $111.00/Hour
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Subconsultants Direct Billing x 1.10
In-House Office Services: As listed below x 1.10
Plotting:
Color Bond $4.65/sf
Black & White Bond $2.95/sf
Vellum $4.55/sf
Mylar $10.50/sf
Transparencies:
Color $3.25/each
Black and White $2.25/each
Color Laser Prints:
8.5 x 11 $.65/each
11 x 17 $.95/each
Blueprints:
24 x 36 $2.00/each
30 x 42 $2.50/each
Black & White Laser Prints:
8.5 x 11 $.10/each
11 x 17 $.15/each
CD Media:
CDR $6.00/each
Outside Reimbursable Expenses:
Reproduction, photography, shipping and postage,
miscellaneous expenses Direct Cost x 1.10
Travel:
Mileage Round Trip from SSA office Current IRS Rate
Other travel expenses Direct Cost x 1.10
Packet Page 143
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT B
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of Agency, and prior to commencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to Agency.
Note: Verify minimum limit for each coverage with Risk Manager.
General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.
Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.
Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.
Note: May need to delete workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance requirements for certain sole proprietorships, partnerships, or corporations without employees.
Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000).
Consultant shall submit to Agency, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of Agency, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.
Packet Page 144
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT B
Note: If the required limits for general liability, auto and employer’s liability are $1 million or less, the following paragraph may be omitted.
Umbrella or excess liability insurance. [Optional depending on limits required].
Consultant shall obtain and maintain an umbrella or excess liability insurance policy with limits that will provide bodily injury, personal injury and property damage liability coverage at least as broad as the primary coverages set forth above, including commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability. Such policy or policies shall include the following terms and conditions:
• A drop down feature requiring the policy to respond if any primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason;
• Pay on behalf of wording as opposed to reimbursement; • Concurrency of effective dates with primary policies; • Policies shall “follow form” to the underlying primary policies; and • Insureds under primary policies shall also be insureds under the umbrella or excess policies.
Other provisions or requirements
Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to Agency as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by Agency’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance.
Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with Agency at all times during the term of this contract. Agency reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Work hereunder by Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by Agency shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of Agency before the Agency’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
Packet Page 145
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT B
Agency’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Agency has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Agency will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Agency will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments.
In the alternative, Agency may cancel this Agreement.
Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the Agency’s Risk Manager.
Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against Agency, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against Agency, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
Enforcement of contract provisions (non estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the Agency to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the Agency nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the Agency requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the Agency.
Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to Agency with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage.
Packet Page 146
FERNANDO PARK PLAYGROUND IMIPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT B
Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that Agency and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.
Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to Agency and approved of in writing.
Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to Agency for review.
Agency’s right to revise specifications. The Agency reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the Agency and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation.
Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by Agency. Agency reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by Agency.
Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give Agency prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this AGREEMENT, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.
Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.
Packet Page 147
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
ON-CALL CONSULTANTS - ENGINEERING
FOR CITY OF SEASIDE
Table of Contents
Introduction............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Proposal Requirements........................................................................................................................................... 1 Statement of Qualifications Submittal Requirements........................................................................................... 2 Schedule for Selection Process ............................................................................................................................... 2 Questions Regarding This Project ........................................................................................................................... 3 Form of Agreement ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Evaluation and Rating Criteria................................................................................................................................ 3 PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF SERVICES............................................................................................................... 3 General Provisions ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Non-Discrimination & Non-Preferential Treatment ............................................................................................. 6 Grounds for Disqualification............................................................................................................................... 6 Records and Financial Data ................................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction
The City of Seaside (City) seeks Request for Qualifications (RFQs) from qualified consulting firms or individuals to provide On-Call Engineering Services for miscellaneous undetermined projects.
The selected engineering firms may be requested to help with the design of federal, state and locally funded capital improvement projects. The City intends to select multiple consultants for a three-year period, with the option of two (2) one-year extensions through mutual consent between the City and the chosen Consultant(s). Consultants do not need to be able to provide all services described in the “Preliminary Scope of Services,” below. Selection will be based on demonstrated expertise in providing support to the City of Seaside Public Works and Engineering Department.
Proposal Requirements
Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) must be received by 5:00 PM Friday, April 22, 2022 at the following address:
City of Seaside
440 Harcourt Avenue
Seaside, CA 93955
SOQ received after this deadline will not be accepted. Incomplete responses that do not conform to the requirements specified herein will not be considered. The SOQ and any accompanying documents shall be submitted in a sealed envelope with the words “On-Call ConsultantsEngineering” clearly marked in the lower left-hand corner of the envelope. Three bound copies, plus one electronic copy submitted on CD, USB flash drive, or by email to [email protected], containing an Adobe pdf copy, should be submitted.
Exhibit C
Packet Page 148
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 2 - Statement of Qualifications Submittal Requirements
The SOQ should include the following information:
1. Name of proposer and principal contact person, including office location, address, telephone number, fax numbers and e-mail address.
2. Brief description and history of the proposed project team and experience of the principal contact. Clearly describe project team member’s experience in work described under “Preliminary Scope of Services". Describe the average project size and scope of the team member’s past projects.
3. Provide as exhibits, listings of your firm’s and its principals’ and project teams experience demonstrating their capabilities and qualifications to perform the assigned task as described in the “Preliminary Scope of Services”. For each individual, provide current professional registrations, related experience, educational background and years of experience with the team.
4. Enclosed is a copy of the City’s standard contract, which stipulates, among other things, insurance requirements. Please confirm that the project team can accept the terms of the contract and has the required insurance, or can acquire insurance, that meets the minimum standards.
5. Please provide at least three professional references. Indicate which references are public agencies for which the project team, or its principals, have provided services for within the past five years.
6. Standard Hourly Fees: Provide your standard hourly fees by job classification and billing criteria for providing the services described in this RFQ in a separate sealed envelope. Do not provide in the response to this request as an exhibit or in the body of the response The SOQ will be limited to 10 numbered pages including title sheet and cover letter if provided.
Minimum font size is 12. Page size is limited to letter size with no fold-outs. Submittals must be printed on both sides of the paper. A clear front and back cover shall be provided and the front and back clear cover will not count towards the 10 page limit.
Schedule for Selection Process
The proposed consultant selection schedule is as follows.
Release RFQ
Questions Due
Thursday, March 24, 2022
Friday, April 8, 2022
Proposal due
Proposal Ranking
Friday, April 22, 2022
April 24, 2022 – May 20, 2022
Consultant Award (if applicable) Friday, May 27, 2022
Packet Page 149
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 3 - Questions Regarding This Project
All questions and/or contacts regarding this Request should be directed to:
Patrick Grogan
City of Seaside-Engineering Division
440 Harcourt Avenue
Seaside, CA 93955
E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Phone (831) 899-6885
Form of Agreement
A copy of the City of Seaside Consultant Contract is included herewith.
Evaluation and Rating Criteria
City staff will review each SOQ for completeness and content. Each SOQ will be evaluated based upon the relevant qualifications and experience of the consultant. Consultants do not need to be able to provide all services described in the “Preliminary Scope of Services,” below. Staff may conduct interviews if necessary. References may also be verified. The SOQ review will focus upon the following criteria:
1. Experience and demonstrated ability of the team. – 25 points
2. Appropriate relevant experience and skills of personnel (principals, project managers and other key personnel). – 30 points
3. Prime consultant and sub-consultants experience in providing similar projects. – 15 points
4. Client References. – 10 points
5. Overall quality of the response and conformance with SOQ requirements for content (reference Proposal and Submittal Requirements). – 20 points
SOQs will be ranked on the basis of qualifications. The City of Seaside may conduct interviews with some or all of the firms/individuals who submit proposals, or it may complete its evaluation based on the proposals alone. If interviews are conducted, firms/individuals selected for interview will be contacted at that time to arrange the date and time for their interview.
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant is required to provide engineering design and professional services for various projects to be implemented throughout the City. The scope of work under this contract may include but not be limited to the following:
A. Engineering Services
Design, Survey and Geometrics
Pavement Evaluation, Design and Testing
Pavement Management Program Evaluation and Report
Packet Page 150
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 4 - Hydrology/Hydraulic Analysis
Structural Analysis and Design
Well Design and Rehabilitation
Water System Design and Rehabilitation
Storm Drain System Design and Rehabilitation
Value Engineering
Seismic Evaluations
Construction Phase Services
B. Professional Services
Disabled Accessibility Evaluations and Mitigation
Preliminary Engineering Studies
Technical Studies and Reports
Peer Reviews
Coordination with Other Agencies and Utilities
Constructability and Bidability Reviews
On-Call Services
Staff Augmentation
All materials submitted to the City will become the exclusive property of the City of Seaside.
The consultant will not be allowed to provide services when the City determines a potential conflict of interest may exist.
Consultant services will be on an as-needed, on-call basis. Consultant services will be authorized by separate contract(s). The Consultant is responsible for acknowledging receipt of requests for services within two (2) working days. Contracts may vary significantly in size and scope and will be determined in greater detail as each is assigned. The Consultant will be responsible for preparing a detailed scope and fee estimate for each contract request and shall identify the number of hours to be worked and position of each person performing work on a particular proposal. If during actual work the number of hours is increased by more than 20% of the estimate, the consultant shall notify the Project Manager as soon as possible before exceeding the estimated time. The City may elect to reduce the scope of work or may require a revised scope of work to cover the excess time. Work authorization will be issued for each work request. The City shall authorize all consultant quotes for tasks prior to the consultant commencing work. The City may accept the Consultant’s scope and fee or negotiate with the Consultant, as appropriate. The City reserves the right to not accept the Consultant’s scope and fee.
General Provisions
1. The City will assume no responsibility for any understandings or representations concerning conditions made by any of its officers or employees prior to execution of a final agreement unless they are included in this Request for Qualifications.
2. Any reasonable inquiry to determine the responsibility of a prospective Consultant(s) may be conducted. The submission of Qualifications shall constitute permission by the Packet Page 151
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 5 - prospective Consultant(s) for the City to verify all information contained therein. If the City deems it necessary, additional information may be requested from the prospective Consultant(s) for further consideration.
3. A prospective Consultant(s) may withdraw their Qualifications at any time prior to the date and time which is set forth herein as the deadline for acceptance of Qualifications.
4. Each prospective Consultant(s) submitting Qualifications in response to this Request agrees the preparation of all materials for submittal to the City and all presentations are at the prospective entities sole cost and expense, and the City will not, under any circumstances, be responsible for any costs or expenses incurred by a prospective Consultant(s). In addition, each prospective Consultant(s) agrees that all documentation and materials submitted with Qualifications will remain the property of the City and will become a public document.
5. The City reserves the right to request additional information from any and all prospective entities as deemed necessary by the City in order to evaluate the Qualifications. This process may not be used as an opportunity to submit missing documentation or to make substantive revisions to the original Qualifications.
6. The City reserves the right to reject any and all Qualifications and, in the event the Consultant selected, it may attempt to negotiate an agreement with the Consultant that, in the sole judgment of the City, is the best qualified to provide the services requested.
7. The City shall not enter into an agreement with any prospective Consultant(s) that has previously had an agreement with the City terminated, or that has previously been found to have violated any provision of the Seaside City Code, or related resolutions or ordinances, or any provision of federal law, state, or other local law.
8. The City reserves the right to enter into an agreement with an Consultant(s) at any time, deviate from this Request, reject any or all SOQs, continue to advertise for new Qualifications, negotiate with multiple entities simultaneously, waive any defects in Qualifications, or to proceed otherwise. The Request and the selection process will in no way be deemed to create a binding contract or agreement of any kind between the City and any prospective Consultant(s). The submission of Qualifications does not in any way commit the City to enter into an agreement with any prospective Consultant(s).
9. Each prospective Consultant(s) shall agree to abide by all federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations and to secure all necessary licenses, permits, and other forms of identification as may be required in connection with the resulting agreement, all at no additional cost to the City.
10. All Qualifications, charge rates or representations will remain in effect and be legally binding for at least one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of submission.
Packet Page 152
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 6 -
11. This Request for Qualifications shall be governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California and the jurisdiction of any disputes hereunder shall be had in Monterey County.
Non-Discrimination & Non-Preferential Treatment
The successful Consultant shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, sex, color, age, religion, sexual orientation, actual or perceived gender identity, disability, ethnicity, or national origin, in connection with or related to the performance of City of Seaside contracts.
Grounds for Disqualification
All prospective entities are expected to conduct themselves with the utmost integrity and responsibility throughout the Request process. Any prospective Consultant(s) that violates these expectations, as determined in the sole discretion of the City, will be subject to disqualification.
Generally, the grounds for disqualification include:
1. Contact regarding this procurement with any City official or employee, other than the contact person designated in this Request, from the time of issuance of this Request until the consideration and approval of a professional services agreement.
2. Evidence of collusion, directly or indirectly, among prospective entities in regard to the amount, or the terms and conditions of this Request and the prospective agreement.
3. Influencing, or attempting to influence, any City staff member or official throughout the solicitation process, including the development of specifications beyond those included here, if any.
4. Evidence of submitting incorrect or inaccurate information in response to this Request or misrepresentation or failing to disclose facts during the evaluation or negotiation process.
5. Existence of any lawsuit, claim, or dispute between the prospective Consultant(s) and the City.
6. Evidence of the prospective Consultant(s)’s inability to successfully complete the responsibilities and obligations of the Request process.
7. The prospective Consultant(s)’s default under any City agreement or termination of a previous agreement.
Records and Financial Data
All correspondence with the City, including responses to this Request, will become the exclusive property of the City and will become public records under the California Public Records Act. All documents submitted in response to this Request will be subject to disclosure if requested by a member of the public. There are a very limited number of narrow exceptions to this disclosure requirement.
Packet Page 153
City of Seaside-Statement of Qualifications
On-Call Consultants - Engineering
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Engineering Services\EngSrvcs_2022 (with PMP)\RFQ\RFQ_Eng Srv with PMP.docx - 7 - Personal financial information that a prospective Consultant(s) considers confidential, the disclosure of which would be an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, should be submitted in a sealed envelope marked “CONFIDENTIAL: PERSONAL FINANCIAL RECORDS; NOT PUBLIC RECORDS.” A prospective Consultant(s) should not mark their entire Qualifications as “Confidential.” During the selection process, the City will keep such information confidential and will not disclose it, except as otherwise required under applicable law. This means that, depending on the nature of timing of the request, or future court decisions, that personal financial information may not remain private and may be publicly disclosed. Once the selection process is completed, the City will return this information to any prospective agency that is not selected.
If an Consultant(s) is selected, the City may retain any submitted information and disclose it to the City Council, and any subcommittees thereof, and the public in connection with consideration of an agreement with the City as evidence of the entities ability to carry out the development. Given the nature of the applicable law under the California Public Records Act, the City cannot guarantee or warrant that it will be able to keep submitted information, including personal financial records, confidential. The successful Consultant(s) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from and against any suit brought under the California Public Records Act to obtain the records; otherwise, the City shall not be obligated to defend such suit and may release the records.
Packet Page 154
Packet Page 155
Packet Page 156
Packet Page 157
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.I.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Dominique Davis, City Clerk
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS INDUCTING COLONEL ALFRED P.
GLOVER, SR, DR. BETTYE J. LUSK, MAYOR JERRY SMITH
(POSTHUMOUSLY), CARLOS RAMOS (POSTHUMOUSLY),
RUTHIE WATTS AND HELEN RUCKER INTO THE BROADWAY
AVE WALK OF FAME
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt resolutions inducting the 2022 class of Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame honorees.
BACKGROUND
On February 3, 2022, the City Council approved the Broadway Walk of Fame policy to honor local Seaside residents and community members that have had a significant impact on the City.
On June 1, 2022, the City Council approved the recommendation of the Broadway Walk of Fame Ad-hoc Committee, nominating Colonel Alfred P. Glover, Sr., Dr. Bettye Lusk, Mayor Jerry Smith, Carlos Ramos, Ruthie Watts and Helen Rucker.
On February 11, 2023, the City hosted the ribbon cutting, induction and unveiling ceremony for the honorees. The resolutions for induction memorializes the action taken to honor these individuals and induct them as the 2023 inaugural class of honorees into the Broadway Walk of Fame.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ATTACHMENTS
Packet Page 158
Item No. 8.I. Page 2 of 2
1. Reso. Carlos Ramos
2. Reso. Colonel Alfred P. Glover
3. Reso. Dr. Bettye Lusk
4. Reso. Helen Rucker
5. Reso. Jerry Smith
6. Reso. Ruthie Watts
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 159
RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE
APPROVING THE INDUCTION OF CARLOS RAMOS (POSTHUMOUSLY)
AS A 2022 INDUCTEE TO THE BROADWAY AVENUE WALK OF FAME
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside honors individuals who have made a significant and lasting contribution to the well-being of our residents and quality of life in Seaside and Monterey County by inducting them into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame including placing a star with their name on Broadway Avenue. Carlos Ramos exemplifies the attributes of an honorable community leader who should be inducted; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ramos was a man of pride, dignity, integrity, selfishness and a huge voice for those that were under-served or forgotten. In his heart and soul, he was a resident of Seaside; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ramos served over 20 years in broadcast-marketing (Radio and TV; English and Spanish-language stations) in the areas of media sales, sales management and TV management in the San Francisco and Central Coast media markets. In 2005, he founded a communication consultancy, Ramos Córdova Strategy Group, to provide professional services to business and nonprofit executives, locally and state-wide, he gave a voice to countless small businesses in Seaside and would often go to court to support and guide those that needed to be heard. Mr. Ramos believed in making the lives of others better and he did that in Seaside; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ramos was a 27 year member of League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), a California LULAC Foundation Board member, served as secretary, treasurer, Vice President & President of LULAC (Seaside) Council #2895 numerous times, and as Treasurer when he passed; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ramos was a founding member of the Blue Ribbon Task Force for the Reduction of Youth Violence; co-founded the concept and term for Seaside's Commission on Jobs, Opportunities, and Businesses in Seaside (C-JOBS), focusing on the economic opportunities in Seaside, President, Alisal Merchants Association; Chair, Coalition of Minority Organizations of the Monterey Peninsula, HQ in Seaside; Vice President of the Economic Development Corporation for Monterey County; Board Member, Community Foundation for Monterey County; Board Member, Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce; and Board Member, American Red Cross of Monterey County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ramos was a leading member of The Citizens Committee for Monterey Peninsula Community College (MPC) Redistricting, creating five trustee areas to create a fairer representation of five communities of interest, Seaside being one.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby posthumously award Carlos Ramos induction into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame for Community & Social Equality.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 16
th
day of February, 2023, by the following vote:
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
Packet Page 160
ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 161
RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE APPROVING THE INDUCTION OF COLONEL ALFRED P. GLOVER (RET.) AS A 2022 INDUCTEE TO THE BROADWAY AVENUE WALK OF FAME
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside honors individuals who have made a significant and lasting contribution to the well-being of our residents and quality of life in Seaside and Monterey County by inducting them into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame including placing a star with their name on Broadway Avenue. Colonel Alfred P. Glover (Ret.) exemplifies the attributes of an honorable community leader who should be; and
WHEREAS, born in July 5, 1931, Colonel Alfred P. Glover was raised by a single mother, his father was sadly killed in a car accident before they met; and WHEREAS, Colonel Alfred P. Glover began Reserve Officers' Training Corps in college, rose to the rank of Colonel, was awarded a Silver Star Medal the U.S. Armed Forces’ third-highest military decoration for valor in combat (gallantry in action) among other recognitions during his 23 years in the Army; and WHEREAS, after retirement, Col. Glover entered into real estate development, his first venture was a 5-plex development, including Col. Glover’s accomplishments include being a founding member of Cypress Coast Bank in 1992, Community (Salinas) Bank, and 1st Capitol Bank in 2007, serving as both Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Audit Committees; and
WHEREAS, Col. Grover has inspired, encouraged, and led our community for over 52 years by truly understanding the significance of economic investment and development in Seaside and Monterey County, including the enduring benefits of diversity, inclusion, and equality at the business roundtable; and WHEREAS, throughout his career Col. Glover weathered racism but still persevered, through his involvement in organizations including but not limited to Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc., NAACP, the Board of Directors for Salvation Army and Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula; and WHEREAS, Col. Glover is never content to simply resting on past successes or accepting mediocrity as the status-quo, he challenges himself and others to do more. Col. Glover was a founding member Citizens for Transparency (in government), Seaside Fairness Coalition (equity in community development projects), some of his honors include Seaside Chamber of Commerce 1982 Citizen of the Year, and he received the Key to the City of Seaside on April 21, 2022. Col. Grover is one of Monterey County’s highly regarded & humble financial philanthropist in the areas of education, community building, and social equality; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize Colonel Alfred P. Glover induction into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame for Community & Social Equality.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 16
th
day of February, 2023, by the following vote:
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
Packet Page 162
ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 163
RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE APPROVING THE INDUCTION OF DR. BETTYE J. LUSK
AS A 2022 INDUCTEE TO THE BROADWAY AVENUE WALK OF FAME
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside honors individuals who have made a significant and lasting contribution to the well-being of our residents and quality of life in Seaside and Monterey County by inducting them into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame, including placing a star with their name on Broadway Avenue. Dr. Bettye J. Lusk exemplifies the attributes of an honorable community leader who should be inducted; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Lusk was born in a little town in Arkansas, with a population of 197. She recounts, “The thrill of my day was meeting my friends in the fork of the road and walking about 3 miles to a one-room schoolhouse. We had lots of fun talking to neighbors, who encouraged us along the path to school, telling us to be good kids, complete our schoolwork and “mind the teacher.” Dr. Lusk was guided by her Grandpa’s mantra, “believe in yourself, study and get a good education;” and WHEREAS, Dr. Lusk attained a Doctorate Degree in Education, and Administrative Credentials, while working within Monterey Peninsula Unified School District (MPUSD). Dr. Lusk became the first female Principal at Seaside High School with a tenure of 11 years, the longest tenured in Monterey County by far and retired with 35 years of honorable service with MPUSD; and WHEREAS, Dr. Lusk is a highly esteemed educator serving her 4 th
elected four-year term on the
MPUSD Board of Trustee, Area 3 representing most of Seaside, her 7 th
two year term as a California
School Boards Association (CSBA), Director-at-Large African American, and now serves on this statewide body’s Executive Committee as the CSBA Vice President, second in line for the presidency; and WHEREAS, Dr. Lusk is a longtime community leader on the Monterey Peninsula, having lived in the City of Seaside for the last 49 years. Dr. Lusk continued to serve on numerous educational Boards and Committees which includes: NAACP, LULAC, County/State Educational, Blue Zone, Mayor’s Advisory, Dr. Lusk is First Lady Emeritus at Bethel Church and President of Monterey Peninsula Alumnae Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Lusk inspires and encourages Seaside citizens with knowledge she has gained, and also provides positive opportunities for Seaside youth through Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.; Dr.
Lusk’s servant leadership has produced generations of world-class professionals in the fields of science, technology, business, the arts and the world of sports, one of Dr. Lusk’s mottos is “A Commitment to...Every Child. Every Child...A Success...Every Child...a tapestry woven piece by piece!” NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize Dr. Bettye J. Lusk induction into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame for Education.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 16
th
day of February, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
Packet Page 164
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 165
RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE
APPROVING THE INDUCTION OF HELEN RUCKER
AS A 2022 INDUCTEE TO THE BROADWAY AVENUE WALK OF FAME
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside honors individuals who have made a significant and lasting contribution to the well-being of our residents and quality of life in Seaside and Monterey County by inducting them into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame including placing a star with their name on Broadway Avenue. Helen Rucker exemplifies the attributes of an honorable community leader who should be inducted; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Rucker moved to Seaside from Oakland in 1964, is a long-time civil rights/community activist and leader in Seaside and the Monterey Peninsula; she became the first African-American librarian in the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District, retiring as a teacher; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Rucker served on the Seaside City Council from 1992-1998 serving a term as Mayor Pro-Tem, and a MPUSD Board of Trustees, Representing Area 2 from 2005-2013. Mrs. Rucker was instrumental in the efforts that led to the establishment of California State University Monterey Bay (CSUMB) and served as a University Fellow; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Rucker’s belief that we should provide an excellence education for all students, regardless of socio-economic status, race, or educational level of their parents, led to CSUMB’s Center for Black Student Success being renamed to the Helen Rucker Center for Black Excellence; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Rucker will tell just about everyone she meets they must understand the great responsibility and privilege it is to vote, to promote the importance of registering to vote, being informed about the candidates, and voting, in 2008 she opened the Seaside Voter Education/Registration Center; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Rucker in 2015 was named Assembly District 29 Woman of the Year, in 2017, awarded the NAACP Monterey County Branch Medgar Evers Freedom Award for a life time of courage and laying the foundation for future leaders, including the Panetta Institute Forum Task Force; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Rucker is never content to simply resting on past successes, or accepting mediocrity as the status-quo, and she challenges herself and others to do more. Therefore, Mrs. Rucker was presented with the Key to the City of Seaside on February 15, 2022; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize Helen Rucker induction into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame for Civics & Government.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 16
th
day of February, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
Packet Page 166
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 167
RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE
APPROVING THE INDUCTION OF MAYOR JERRY SMITH (POSTHUMOUSLY) AS A 2022 INDUCTEE TO THE BROADWAY AVENUE WALK OF FAME
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside honors individuals who have made a significant and lasting contribution to the well-being of our residents and quality of life in Seaside and Monterey County by inducting them into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame including placing a star with their name on Broadway Avenue. Mayor Jerry Smith exemplifies the attributes of an honorable community leader who should be inducted; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Smith was born on August 27, 1945 in Monterey California, a descendant of a pioneer family that arrived on the Monterey Peninsula in 1889. Mayor Smith loved Seaside, his home for over 60 years. He had a lasting desire to assist and serve others. He was a loving husband, great friend, servant of the people in Seaside, and devoted member of St. Francis Xavier Church; and WHEREAS, Mayor Smith attended Monterey Peninsula College, majoring in Data Processing and Accounting, served in Vietnam with the 4th Infantry Division and completing his service as a Sergeant in the 5th Division Military Police Company. In 1982, Mayor Smith began his law enforcement career with State of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (CDCR) retiring as a Lieutenant with 20 years of service as a Peace Officer, and serving as the Community Resources Manager and Public Information Officer, at Correction Training Facility (CTF) Soledad; and WHEREAS, Mayor Smith won his first of three terms as Mayor of Seaside in 1998, in 2004 Jerry Smith became the first African American elected to the Monterey County Board of Supervisors.
Representing the 4th District, which comprises all of Seaside, Sand City, Marina, Del Ray Oaks, parts of Monterey and Salinas, served on the boards of Ft. Ord Reuse Authority, Local Agency Formation Commission, Transportation Agency Monetary County, Association of Bay Area Governments, the Rancho Cielo, and CALAFCO. Mayor Smith was awarded the Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce 2001 Public Official of the Year, the 2007 Monterey County Veteran of the Year, inducted into the Monterey Peninsula Collage Hall of Fame to name a few of his numerous accomplishments; and
WHEREAS, Jerry and his wife Byrl, the love of his life, were together for over 40 years. They shared a great passion for life as well as service to others. Mayor Smith was a role model for family devotion and community involvement. He was an honorable man with an unfailing graciousness and human compassion for all whom came into contact with him; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby posthumously award Mayor Jerry Smith induction into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame for Civics and Government.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 16
th
day of February, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
Packet Page 168
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 169
RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE
APPROVING THE INDUCTION OF ELLA RUTHIE WATTS
AS A 2022 INDUCTEE TO THE BROADWAY AVENUE WALK OF FAME
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside honors individuals who have made a significant and lasting contribution to the well-being of our residents and quality of life in Seaside and Monterey County by inducting them into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame including placing a star with their name on Broadway Avenue. Mrs. Ella Ruthie Watts exemplifies the attributes of an honorable community leader who should be inducted; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Watts since moving with her family to the Monterey Peninsula in 1965 has relentlessly advocated for diversity, equity and inclusion for all residents in the County. Her legacy of service spans over 58 years, she works unceasingly to expand opportunities and empower youth and adults to enter the social, economic, and political mainstream, Mrs. Watts was self-employed for 35 yrs., operating the Park Lane Beauty Salon; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Watts life-long advocacy for civil rights, racial equality, and economic opportunities was born out of her experiences growing up in the small community of York, South Carolina at the height of Jim Crow segregation, where she bore the indignities of bigotry as part of everyday life for African Americans living and working in many places, she now is listed in the York High School Hall of Fame; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Watts learned that the struggle for full political, civil, and social rights demanded fearlessness and relentless determination in the 1970’s, she co-founded the Coalition of Minority Organizations (COMO), a political alliance of minority groups and white progressive groups that pioneered a new form of civil rights political activism. In 1977 she attended her first meeting of the NAACP Monterey County Branch, later serving as Membership Chair for 12 years, and 2 terms as Branch President; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Watts volunteer leadership positions include but not limited to: Advisory Board Member, Salvation Army of the Monterey Peninsula; President of the Monterey Bay Links, Inc.; Founding Member of the Foundation to Support the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District; MPUSD Citizens’ Oversight Committee; Co-founder Coalition of Scholarship Organizations; Monterey Peninsula College Affirmative Action Board; Women’s Leadership Council Advisory Committee CSUMB; 35 yrs., NAACP Life Membership Banquet Committee; 32yrs., Seaside Black History Program; 12yrs., Monterey County’s OEDC; 12yrs.,Monterey County Action Board; 9yrs., Central Coast Visiting Nurses Assn./Hospice; YWCA & LMP; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Watts honors including: Congressional Award from Congressman Sam Farr, State Legislature Woman of the Year, KSBW Jefferson Award, Outstanding Woman of Monterey County Award, ACLU Ralph B. Akins Civil Rights Award, CSUMB Fellow Award, NAACP’s President’s Award, Stephen E. Ross Award, Life Membership and Western Area Unsung Hero Award, and the CSUMB Chapter’s African American and Civil Rights Champion Award, KSBW Neighborhood Award, Seaside/Sand City Chamber of Commerce and the Kiwanis Citizen of the Year Awards, Woman of Achievement Award by the Seaside Business and Professional Women’s Club; and was presented the Key to the City of Seaside twice: by Mayor Lance McClair and Mayor Oglesby, Ms. Juneteenth 2021, Hays CME Church Missionary Society Woman of the Year; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize Mrs. Ella Ruthie Watts induction into the City of Seaside’s Broadway Ave. Walk of Fame for Community and Social Equality.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 16
th
day of February, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
Packet Page 170
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 171
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.A.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Samantha Alcaraz, Human Resources Analyst
Victor Damiani, Finance Director
Dan Meewis, Recreation Director
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PARTTIME (REGULAR, TEMPORARY, AND SEASONAL) DEFINITION
AND CLASSIFICATION TO MONITOR THE ALLOWED NUMBER
OF HOURS WORKED PER FISCAL YEAR (FIRST READING - ROLL
CALL VOTE)
RECOMMENDATION
First reading of an ordinance on defining part-time classifications (regular and temporary/seasonal part-time) and maximum hours worked, per fiscal year.
BACKGROUND
A temporary/seasonal part-time employee is defined as working no more than 999 hours in a fiscal year and a classified regular part-time employee will work between 1,000 and no more than1,560 hours per fiscal year. Upon written approval of the City Manager, or his/her designee, the maximum hours worked by a regular part-time employee in a fiscal year may be increased to 1800 hours. For temporary/seasonal employees, they will be released and re-hired, if applicable, once the 999 hours are reached within a fiscal year. Written approvals shall automatically expire at the end of the fiscal year within which the original approval is granted. Regular part-time employees shall be eligible for those benefits required by applicable state and federal law and to participate in the appropriate City CalPERS Retirement System. Regular parttime employee classifications shall be eligible for those salary increases adopted by the City Resolutions.
FISCAL IMPACT
Packet Page 172
Item No. 9.A. Page 2 of 2
The City's pension costs are expected to increase significantly in the coming years and reach as high as $7.5 million to $9.6 million per year. Pension cost is one of the most significant budget headwinds that the City faces. Having a well defined policy regarding temporary & seasonal workers will assist the City in containing pension costs.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Ordinance
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 173
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE
PROVIDING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO SEASIDE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
2.44 PERSONNEL SYSTEM, UPDATING SECTION 2.44.060
AUTHORIZING THE PART-TIME (REGULAR, TEMPORARY, AND SEASONAL)
DEFINITION, CLASSIFICATION, AND NUMBER OF HOURS ALLOWED TO
WORK PER FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the City’s need to establish an ordinance for Part-Time classification, definition, and allotted hours per fiscal year, and benefits on recommendation of the City Manager and approval by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide the City’s cost savings, the maximum amount of hours of part-time temporary/seasonal employees will not exceed 1,000 hours in a fiscal year and will be eligible for benefits required by applicable state and federal law; and THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. GENERAL PURPOSE AND FINDINGS.
The purpose of this Ordinance is to consider the following text amendments to the Seaside Municipal Code:
Text amendment to Seaside Municipal Code Chapter 2.44 Personnel System, and to update Section 2.44.060 Appointments and probation.
SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE.
The proposed changes to the Ordinance will not result in direct or indirect changes to the environment and do not meet the definition of project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (14 CCR 15378(b)).
SECTION 3. TEXT AMENDMENT
The ordinance revises section 2.44.060. Additions are show in underline as follows:
Appointments to vacant positions in the classified service shall be made in accordance with the personnel rules. Appointments and promotions shall be based on merit and fitness to be ascertained so far as practicable by competitive examination. All appointments and promotions in the city service shall be made without regard to race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical or mental disability, Packet Page 174
medical condition, sexual orientation, marital status, gender identity, gender expression, genetic characteristics or information, military or veteran’s status, and/or any other category protected by federal, state, or local law.
All full-time appointments shall be for a probationary period of not less than twelve months. Appointments will not be considered regular until successful completion of the probationary period, which may be extended in accordance with the personnel rules.
Probation for promotional appointments shall be for a period of not less than six months except members of police and fire service associations which are subject to twelve-month probationary periods. (Ord. 1042 § 2 (Att. A), 2017; Ord. 442 § 1, 1974; prior code § 1- 409. Formerly 2.44.030)
The regular part-time will be defined as hours works between 1,000 and no more than 1560 per fiscal year. With written approval from the City Manager, or his/her designee, the maximum hours worked in a fiscal year may be increased to 1800 hours. Such approval shall automatically expire at the end of the fiscal year within which the original approval is granted.
The regular part-time employees shall be eligible for those benefits required by applicable state and federal law and to participate in the appropriate City retirement system. The regular part-time employees shall also be eligible for those salary adjustments as adopted by City Council Resolutions.
SECTION 4. FINDINGS.
The City Council hereby finds that the part-time established definitions, classifications, benefits, and number of hours allowed to work per fiscal year.
SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY.
A. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, including the application of such part or provision to other person or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, provisions of this Ordinance are severable.
B. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that nay one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phases be held unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption at a duly noticed public hearing for the second reading of the proposed text revisions.
Packet Page 175
INTRODUCED AND PASSED TO PRINT at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside, State of California, on the 16th day of February 2023.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside, State of California, on the 2nd day of March 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED:
________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 176
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.B.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Andrew Myrick, Economic Development & Community Planning Manager DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE SEASIDE MUNICIPAL CODE
MODIFYING SECTION 17.52.230 (ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS) TO IMPLEMENT RECENT HOUSING BILLS - THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DOES NOT APPLY
(FIRST READING - ROLL CALL VOTE)
RECOMMENDATION
First reading of an ordinance amending title 17 (Zoning Ordinance of the Seaside Municipal Code modifying Section 17.52.230 (Accessory Dwelling Units) to implement recent housing bills. CEQA does not apply pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17.
BACKGROUND
Chapter 17.74 of the Seaside Zoning Ordinance provides the process to be utilized when the Zoning Ordinance is amended. This Chapter specifies that the Planning Commission is to review all proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments and provide a recommendation to the City Council to either approve, approve with modifications, or deny the Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA).
The proposed ZOA 23-01 would repeal and replace the existing Section 17.52.230 of the Zoning Ordinance relating to Accessory Dwelling Units. An Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is a residential unit that is built on the same site as another, principal dwelling unit. California Law (particularly Government Code Section 65852.2) includes a number of provisions that preempts much local regulation when it comes to approving Accessory Dwelling Units. As a result, City discretion regarding ADUs is limited.
The City Council approved an update to the previous Zoning Ordinance on April 7, 2022 Packet Page 177
Item No. 9.B. Page 2 of 4
(see attached Ordinance No. 2013). Since then, the State of California has approved two additional bills, AB 2221 and SB 897, which have further modified the preemptions to the City’s Code. The City’s Zoning Ordinance is therefore proposed to be modified to reflect these changes. Further, additional modifications are proposed to provide additional clarity to particular provisions of the Code and facilitate the use of the Code as a “manual” for Planners and the public. This has resulted in a partial reorganization of Section 17.52.230.
Update Summary
Significant changes to the Code which have been included are summarized as follows (note that some Section numbers have changed from the current Code):
Maximum Height of Structures – Under the current Ordinance, Section
17.52.230(E)(2) provides for a maximum height of 16 feet for detached ADUs and 22 feet if the ADU is located above a garage. Under the proposed ZOA, Section
17.52.230(G)(2) has been modified to reflect that detached ADUs may in certain situations be increased to 18 feet or more in height. Attached ADUs will be limited to the maximum height of the Zoning District or 25 feet, whichever is less. This change implements the recently adopted Government Code Section 65852.2(c)(2)(D).
Exempt ADUs – The proposed ZOA includes new language that establishes a class of “Exempt ADUs.” This implements Section 65852.2(e) of the Government Code. If a proposed ADU meets the criteria for an Exempt ADU, then the City is limited to reviewing only those criteria specified as being necessary for an Exempt ADU. For example, a detached ADU that is 800 square feet or less, meets minimum 4 foot side and rear yard setbacks, and meets the height maximums specified in the Government Code must be approved regardless of compliance with other provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Exempt ADUs are not subject to the requirements of Subsections G and H (currently Subsections E and G) in the ZOA.
Utility ADUs – Utility ADUs are added as a definition to assist in the implementation of this Section. Government Code Section 65852.2(c)(2)(c) prohibits the application of most zoning criteria that would prevent the construction of an 800 square foot ADU meeting height and setback standards. The existing Code provides that many development regulations are applicable unless their applicability would prevent the construction of an ADU. The inclusion of the definition of a “Utility ADU” which corresponds to the language of Government Code 65852.2(c)(2)(C) will better define when these provisions are applicable and will help the City to ensure that development is consistent with the standards implemented by the community while not conflicting with State laws.
Other, less significant updates are summarized in the Table below:
Packet Page 178
Item No. 9.B. Page 3 of 4
Current Code Proposed ZOA Summary of Change
17.52.230(E)(3) 17.52.230(A) Added clarification that Codes are in addition to Building and Fire Codes.
17.52.230(F) 17.52.230(E) Relocated language prohibiting short-term rentals and separate sales of ADUs to clarify applicability of
requirements to Utility ADUs.
17.52.230(E)(4) 17.52.230(G)(4) Increased maximum floor area for one-bedroom ADU from 800 to 850 square feet pursuant to
Government Code Section 65852.2(c)(2)(B).
Increased maximum size from 40% of size of
primary dwelling to 50% of the size of the primary
dwelling. Eliminated two-bedroom limit.
17.52.230(H)(4) In order to mitigate the effects from the loss of onsite parking when garages and/or carports are converted to ADUs, added language specifying that it
is not required to remove any on-site driveways that
formerly served this parking.
Due to the significant reorganization of the existing Ordinance, the use of "redlines" is unfortunately impractical. Therefore, the Ordinance proposes to repeal and replace the entirety of 17.52.230, rather than amending through a strikethrough/underline format.
The Planning Commission reviewed this language at its meeting of January 25, 2023, and recommended that the City Council adopt the language as presented. A copy of the Resolution is attached.
CEQA Review
Section 21080.17 of the California Public Resources Code provides that the adoption of Ordinances implementing Government Code Section 65852.2 are not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As this ZOA serves to implement Government Code Section 65852.2, no review is necessary under CEQA.
FISCAL IMPACT
This item is not expected to have any fiscal impact upon the City.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Ordinance
2. Ord 2013 Repealing and Amending Section 17.52.230 of SMC
3. PC Resolution 23-02
Packet Page 179
Item No. 9.B. Page 4 of 4
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 180
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE
ADOPTING A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTION 17.52.230 OF THE SEASIDE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2022, the City Council passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2013 to set forth requirements for Accessory Dwelling Units within the City of Seaside; and
WHEREAS, in September 2022, Governor Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill (AB) 2221 and Senate Bill (SB) 897 amending California Government Code section 65852.2, related to ADUs; and
WHEREAS, due to these changes in State law regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs), the City’s ADU ordinance, Section 17.52.230 (Residential Second Units) of the Seaside Municipal Code (SMC) must be updated; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code; and
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and adopted Resolution 23-02 recommending that the City Council adopt ZOA 23-01 as presented by staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Seaside does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein by reference, are true and correct.
SECTION 2. Section 17.52.230 of the Seaside Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as provided in Exhibit A.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance implements Section 65852.2 of the California Government Code and is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code.
SECTION 4. If any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, Packet Page 181
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or its application to other persons or circumstances. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted each provision, section, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty days following adoption of its second reading.
INTRODUCED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside, State of California, duly held on the 16th day of February 2023.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside, State of California, held on the 2nd day of March 2023, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED:
__________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Attach:
Exhibit “A” – Zoning Ordinance Amendment Text
Packet Page 182
Exhibit “A”
Zoning Ordinance Amendment Text
17.52.230 Accessory Dwelling Units
Sections:
A. Purpose and intent.
B. Definitions.
C. Locations permitted.
D. Effect of nonconforming.
E. Legal use requirements.
F. Exempt Projects
G. ADU and JADU design standards.
H. Off-street parking requirements.
I. Processing.
J. Contents of applications.
A. Purpose and intent. The purpose of this Chapter is to allow and regulate accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) in compliance with California Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22, as may be amended. These regulations shall be in addition to any requirements imposed by any other applicable law, including, but not limited to, the Seaside Building Code and Seaside Fire Code.
B. Definitions. As used in this section, terms are defined as follows:
Packet Page 183
“Accessory dwelling unit” or “ADU” means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit located on a parcel with a proposed or existing primary residence that provides a complete independent living facility containing separate kitchen, bath, sleeping, or living facilities. The term “attached accessory dwelling unit” means an accessory dwelling unit that is structurally attached to the main residence but which has independent, direct access from the exterior.
The term “detached accessory dwelling unit” means an accessory dwelling unit that is not structurally attached to the main residence. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following:
1. An efficiency unit, as defined by Section 17858.1 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended; and
2. A manufactured home, as defined by Section 18007 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended.
"Accessory structure" means a building or structure that is incidental to that of the main building on the same parcel.
"Efficiency kitchen" means a kitchen that includes each of the following:
1. A cooking facility with appliances. Appliances shall mean a range, or the combination of an oven and cooktop with a minimum of two burners;
2. A sink that facilitates hot and cold water;
3. A food preparation counter or counters that are adequate for the size of the unit;
4. Food storage cabinets adequate for the size of the unit. "Junior accessory dwelling unit" or "JADU" means a residential unit that:
1. Is no more than 500 square feet in size;
2. Is contained entirely within an existing or proposed single-family structure;
3. Includes its own separate sanitation facilities or shares sanitation facilities with the existing or proposed single-family structure; and
Packet Page 184
4. Includes an efficiency kitchen, as defined in this Chapter. "Living area" means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit, including basements and attics, but does not include a garage or any other accessory structure, other than ADUs and JADUs. “Multifamily ADU” means either:
1. ADUs established within the potions of multifamily structures previously used as livable space, not exceeding 25 percent of the existing multifamily structures; or
2. Detached single family ADUs on a lot that has existing multifamily dwellings being subject to height limits and 4-foot rear yard setbacks. "Nonconforming zoning condition" means a physical improvement on a property that does not conform to current zoning standards.
"Proposed dwelling" means a dwelling that is the subject of a permit application and that meets the requirements for permitting.
"Public transit" means a location, including, but not limited to, any fixed-route bus stop or other transit stop with transportation that runs on fixed routes, and is available to the public. "Tandem parking" means that two or more automobiles are parked on a driveway or in any other location on a parcel, lined up behind one another.
“Tract housing” is a type of housing development in which multiple similar houses are built on a tract (area) that is subdivided into smaller lots.
“Utility ADU” means an ADU no larger than 800 square feet and meeting four-foot required side and rear yard setbacks.
Packet Page 185
C. Locations Permitted. Accessory dwelling units are permitted on parcels of any size in conjunction with a proposed or existing residential use in any zone that allows residential uses.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, nothing in this Section shall be interpreted to render any requirements applicable to the primary dwelling unit(s) on the site inapplicable.
D. Effect of Conforming. An ADU or JADU that conforms to the requirements in this section shall not be:
1. Deemed to be inconsistent with the General Plan and zoning designation for the parcel on which the ADU or JADU is located;
2. Deemed to exceed the allowable density for the parcel on which the ADU or JADU is located;
3. Considered in the application of any ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth; or
4. Required to correct a legally established nonconforming zoning condition. This does not prevent the City from enforcing compliance with applicable building standards in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 17980.12.
E. Legal use requirements. ADUs and JADUs shall comply with the following:
1. Short-term rental prohibited. Any rental term of an ADU or JADU that was legally created on or after January 1, 2017 shall be longer than 30 days.
2. Sale of units. The accessory dwelling unit may not be sold separately from the existing single-family home or multifamily dwelling except as provided in California Government Code Section 65852.26.
Packet Page 186
F. Exempt Projects. The following Exempt Projects shall not be subject to the requirements set forth in Subsections G and H, below, when said projects are located within a residential or mixed use zoning district; however, these Exempt Projects shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Seaside Building and Fire Codes, including requirements for separation between structures and fire-resistance ratings:
1. One Accessory Dwelling Unit and one Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit per lot with a proposed or existing Single-Family Dwelling if all of the following apply:
a. The Accessory Dwelling Unit or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit is within the proposed space of a Single-Family Dwelling or is within the existing space of a SingleFamily Dwelling or Accessory Structure. If within the space of an existing Accessory Structure, the structure may be expanded a maximum of 150 square feet beyond its existing physical dimensions solely for the purpose of accommodating ingress and egress.
b. The ADU or JADU has its own exterior access without need to travel through the existing or proposed Single-Family Dwelling.
c. The side and rear yard setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety, as determined by the City Building Official and Fire Chief. d. Any JADU complies with the requirements of California Government Code 65852.22, as such may be amended from time to time.
2. One new construction Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit, which may also include a JADU within the same building, on a lot with an existing or proposed Single-Family Dwelling, if all of the following apply:
a. The structure shall be set back a minimum of four feet from the side and rear property lines.
b. The total floor area of the structure shall not exceed 800 square feet. c. The height of the structure shall be limited to no more than the heights specified in Section 17.52.230(G)(2).
3. Multiple Accessory Dwelling Units within the portions of existing buildings used for Multifamily Dwelling Units that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited Packet Page 187
to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages. Spaces converted in this manner must meet applicable Building Code standards for dwelling units. The number of Accessory Dwelling Units created in this manner shall not exceed 25% of the originally existing Multifamily Dwelling Units, except that at least one Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be allowed.
4. Not more than two Detached Accessory Dwelling Units that are located on a lot that has existing Multifamily Dwelling Units, where the Detached Accessory Dwelling Units have a height that does not exceed the heights specified in Section 17-52.230 (G)(2) and are set back a minimum of four feet from all side and rear yard property lines.
G. ADU and JADU design standards. ADUs and JADUs shall comply with the following standards:
1. Maximum Number. One ADU and/or one JADU shall be allowed on each lot or parcel with a residential zoning designation. Multifamily ADUs shall comply with Government Code Section 65852.2.
2. Height limit. Accessory Dwelling Units shall comply with the following:
a. An attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed the maximum height specified for the Zoning District in which the ADU is located or 25 feet, whichever is less. b. A newly constructed detached ADU shall be limited to one story and shall not exceed a maximum overall height of sixteen feet (16’), except that a detached ADU may be constructed to a height of 18 feet if:
1) The detached ADU is located on a lot with an existing multistory multifamily dwelling unit; or
2) The detached ADU is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, in which case an additional two feet of height is permitted if necessary to align the roof pitch of the ADU with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling.
Packet Page 188
c. An attached ADU, accessory to a duplex or multifamily, shall be limited to a conversion of existing non-livable space and must maintain the existing height of the structure being converted.
3. Setbacks. ADUs and JADUs shall comply with the setback standards of the primary dwelling(s) for the applicable zone, except that minimum side and rear setbacks of four feet shall be required. A detached ADU shall be located behind the rear building line of the primary residence, and be clearly subordinate by location and size. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
a. Existing Garage. No setback shall be required for an existing, legal, attached or detached garage and/or other existing structure that is converted to an ADU or JADU, or that is demolished and reconstructed in the same location as an ADU.
4. Maximum unit size.
a. The maximum square footage of an ADU shall not exceed 850 square feet for a studio or one-bedroom, and 1000 square feet for units with two or more bedrooms. In no case shall a detached ADU exceed fifty percent of the floor area of the living area of the primary dwelling. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
b. The floor area of a JADU shall not exceed a maximum of 500 square feet, and shall be contained within a proposed or existing single-family dwelling or within a converted garage, carport or covered patio.
c. The floor area for multifamily ADUs shall comply with Government Code Section 65852.2.
Packet Page 189
5. Separate entrance required. An attached ADU and/or JADU shall provide a separate exterior access from the existing primary residence. Entry doors cannot be on the same facade as the primary entry/front door of the primary residence and exterior staircases or ramps shall be placed in the area furthest from any property lines if said staircase encroaches into a side or rear yard setback. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
6. Window placement. Windows facing an adjoining residential property shall be designed to protect the privacy of neighbors; alternatively, fencing or landscaping may be required to provide screening. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
7. Addressing. ADUs or JADUs constructed or established on the same parcel or lot as an existing or proposed single-family dwelling shall be distinguished by utilizing the same address numbers as the primary dwelling followed by the letter “B”, then “C”, and so forth. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
8. Exterior. ADUs or JADUs proposed in Master Planned Communities, areas regulated by Specific Plans, and any tract housing that obtained approval by the Board of Architectural Review shall substantially conform to the originally approved design elements, such as building materials, architectural style, roof pitch, height, scale, and exterior colors and finishes. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
9. Vehicular Door. A garage converted to an accessory dwelling unit shall include removal or exterior concealment of the garage door(s), which shall be replaced or concealed with a wall meeting Building Code requirements and including architectural treatment and features, including if appropriate walls, doors, windows, trim, and accent details, consistent with the primary dwelling. This requirement shall not prevent the Packet Page 190
establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
10. Lighting Restrictions. Any lighting associated with an ADU or JADU shall be shielded or down-lit and shall not shine onto adjoining properties, while meeting the minimum building code. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
11. Landscaping. No less than 20 percent of the lot shall be landscaped. All areas of the site that are not utilized for buildings, patios, parking, pedestrian, or vehicular access shall be landscaped and provided with a permanent irrigation system. The front yard shall be landscaped, exclusive of walkways and driveways. As site conditions allow, and concurrent with each newly established ADU or JADU, a minimum of one (1) tree of not less than (5) gallon size stock, shall be planted upon the same parcel or lot as the ADU or JADU. Upon request, the Zoning Administrator shall provide property owners with a preapproved list of acceptable tree species. The removal or loss of any tree in conjunction with an ADU or JADU shall be replaced with three (3) or more trees of the same species using at least (5) gallon size stock, as determined by the Zoning Administrator, and comply with the requirements of Chapter 8.54.040. All required yards and setback areas shall be attractively landscaped primarily with drought tolerant and native plant materials.
This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this section.
12. Private Open Space/Patios and Decks. Each ADU or JADU shall have a deck or a patio, directly adjoining individual units. The minimum private open space required for each unit shall be no less than 96 square feet with a minimum width of six feet (6’) for a deck/patio and eight feet (8’) for landscaped area. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this section.
H. Off-street parking requirements. At least one off-street paved parking space shall be provided for an accessory dwelling unit, and may be located within the required interior side or Packet Page 191
rear property setback areas, or as tandem parking in compliance with Chapter 17.34 (Off-Street Parking).
1. Notwithstanding the above, no additional parking shall be required if one or more of the following conditions applies to the ADU:
a. The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit. b. The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district within which the parking requirement would be inconsistent.
c. The accessory dwelling unit is part of the proposed or existing primary residence or an accessory structure.
d. When on-street parking permits are required but have not been offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
e. When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit.
f. When a permit application for an ADU is submitted at the same time as a permit application for a new single-family or multifamily dwelling or dwellings located upon the same lot and the ADU meets any of the criteria specified in this subsection.
2. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an ADU, or converted to an ADU, those off-street parking spaces are not required to be replaced.
3. A new driveway approach or curb cut for an ADU or JADU, if needed, may require a separate encroachment permit from the City’s Engineering Department.
4. Notwithstanding Section 17.34.120(A)(1)(d) of the Seaside Municipal Code, when an existing, legally constructed garage or carport is converted to an ADU or JADU, it is unnecessary to remove any existing driveway access or curb cut that formerly served said garage or carport, provided that the driveway is a minimum of 20 feet in length.
Packet Page 192
I. Processing. The City shall provide an approval or denial of ADU and/or JADU applications within (60) sixty days from the date such application is deemed complete, unless the applicant requests a processing delay, in which case the sixty-day period is tolled for the period of the requested delay, up to a maximum of 180 days. If a permit application for an ADU or JADU is submitted along with a permit application to create a new primary dwelling on the same parcel or lot, the City may delay acting on the ADU or JADU application until the City permits the new primary dwelling. The City shall deem ADU applications complete that include all of the information and materials required in the application submittal checklist, comply with the provisions of this chapter, and include full payment of applicable review fees.
J. Contents of Applications. An ADU and/or JADU application shall include the following:
1. Completed Residential Building Permit Application;
2. Completed Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD) residential water release form and permit application.
3. Plan Set - Signed and Dated (If Required). A single PDF file containing all plan sheets, 24”x 36” minimum size, to include:
a. COVER SHEET: Project address; assessor parcel number; legal property owner’s name, address, phone number; plan preparer’s title and license number (If Applicable), address, phone number; scope of work identifying all work proposed, clearly showing existing and proposed work and descriptions, and demonstrating compliance with all applicable CA codes and regulations, California Building or Residential Code, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Energy, Fire, Green Building Codes and City of Seaside Municipal Code; project data, property type, type of construction, occupancy classification, square footage of existing/remodeled/new proposed structure(s) and addition(s), overall building height, fire sprinkler (Yes / No), number of stories; sheet index; deferred submittal list – trusses, sprinklers, etc. (If Applicable); special inspections noted (If Required);
b. SITE PLAN: North arrow; scale; setbacks; lot dimensions; property boundaries; street names; new and existing structures; building footprint and roofline with all projections dimensioned to property lines; gates; walls; fences; driveways; walks; easements; utilities; meter locations; Cal Green Packet Page 193
Mandatory Measures Checklist legibly reproduced on the plans; site improvements, including grading, drainage, and landscape irrigation; c. DEMOLITION PLAN (if Applicable): Showing any existing structure(s), or portion(s) of a structure to be removed with floor plan(s) and framing details; d. FLOOR PLAN (Existing/Proposed): Drawn to scale, dimensioned, rooms labeled, doors and window types, sizes, schedules; framing details; e. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: All sides of the exterior of the building; existing & proposed exterior wall finishes and special finishes; roof materials and roof pitches; door, window, skylight, and other openings, locations, materials, and configurations; vertical dimensions showing the height of structure(s) and heights of finished floors; locations and extent of shear walls, let-in bracing, or other methods of shear transfer;
f. FOUNDATION PLAN: Detailed and dimensioned plans showing slabs and foundations for garages, patios, breezeways, driveways, walks; footings, piers, slabs, grade beams, retaining walls (sizes and locations); hold-downs, connections of new foundations to existing foundations; any special construction required by structure, site conditions, or expansive soils; required compressive strength of concrete; crawl access openings and screened vents under raised wood floors; North arrow;
g. ROOF FRAMING PLAN: Size and spacing of beams, rafters, headers, trusses, roof openings; layout of roof sheathing; nailing; North arrow; h. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: Signed and dated; CRC Braced Walls or CBC Shear Walls; schedule (If Modified); Soils Report (If Applicable), signed and dated;
i. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL PLANS: Location of new or existing mechanical equipment serving the added or altered area; electrical plan with receptacles, lighting, and panel schedule (If Modified); gas line diagram and calculations (If Modified); Energy Certificate of Compliance Forms reproduced on plan sheets; and
j. Monterey Peninsula Unified School District (MPUSD): Release for any payment of school district fees.
Packet Page 194
Packet Page 195
Packet Page 196
Packet Page 197
Packet Page 198
Packet Page 199
Packet Page 200
Packet Page 201
Packet Page 202
Packet Page 203
Packet Page 204
Packet Page 205
Packet Page 206
Packet Page 207
Packet Page 208
RESOLUTION NO. 23-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTION 17.52.230 OF THE SEASIDE ZONING
ORDINANCE REGARDING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2022, the City Council passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2013 to set forth requirements for Accessory Dwelling Units within the City of Seaside; and
WHEREAS, in September 2022, Governor Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill (AB) 2221 and Senate Bill (SB) 897 amending California Government Code section 65852.2, related to ADUs; and
WHEREAS, due to these changes in State law regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs), the City’s ADU ordinance, Section 17.52.230 (Residential Second Units) of the Seaside Municipal Code (SMC) must be updated; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 17.74.040 of the Seaside Zoning Ordinance provides that the Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with modifications, or deny any proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Planning Commission finds that: a) the facts set forth in the recitals in this Resolution are true and correct and incorporated by reference; b) the recitals constitute findings in this matter and, together with the staff report, other written reports, public testimony and other information contained in the record, are an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the action taken in this Resolution; c) the provisions in this Resolution and the proposed permanent Ordinance (Section 17.52.230) are consistent with the General Plan, Seaside Municipal Code and applicable federal and state law; and d) neither this Resolution nor the Ordinance and associated fee schedule amendments will be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare.
Packet Page 209
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance repealing and replacing Section 17.52.230 to read as described in the attached Exhibit “A” and make the findings contained therein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Seaside, State of California, on the 25th day of January, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED:
______________________________
Will Silva, Chairperson
ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
Attach:
Exhibit “A” – Zoning Ordinance Amendment Text
Packet Page 210
Exhibit “A”
Zoning Ordinance Amendment Text
17.52.230 Accessory Dwelling Units
Sections:
A. Purpose and intent.
B. Definitions.
C. Locations permitted.
D. Effect of nonconforming.
E. Legal use requirements.
F. Exempt Projects
G. ADU and JADU design standards.
H. Off-street parking requirements.
I. Processing.
J. Contents of applications.
A. Purpose and intent. The purpose of this Chapter is to allow and regulate accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) in compliance with California Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22, as may be amended. These regulations shall be in addition to any requirements imposed by any other applicable law, including, but not limited to, the Seaside Building Code and Seaside Fire Code.
B. Definitions. As used in this section, terms are defined as follows:
“Accessory dwelling unit” or “ADU” means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit located on a parcel with a proposed or existing primary residence that provides a complete independent living facility containing separate kitchen, bath, sleeping, or living facilities. The term “attached accessory dwelling unit” means an accessory dwelling unit that is structurally attached to the main residence but which Packet Page 211
has independent, direct access from the exterior. The term “detached accessory dwelling unit” means an accessory dwelling unit that is not structurally attached to the main residence. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following:
1. An efficiency unit, as defined by Section 17858.1 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended; and
2. A manufactured home, as defined by Section 18007 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended.
"Accessory structure" means a building or structure that is incidental to that of the main building on the same parcel.
"Efficiency kitchen" means a kitchen that includes each of the following:
1. A cooking facility with appliances. Appliances shall mean a range, or the combination of an oven and cooktop with a minimum of two burners;
2. A sink that facilitates hot and cold water;
3. A food preparation counter or counters that are adequate for the size of the unit;
4. Food storage cabinets adequate for the size of the unit. "Junior accessory dwelling unit" or "JADU" means a residential unit that:
1. Is no more than 500 square feet in size;
2. Is contained entirely within an existing or proposed single-family structure;
3. Includes its own separate sanitation facilities or shares sanitation facilities with the existing or proposed single-family structure; and
4. Includes an efficiency kitchen, as defined in this Chapter. "Living area" means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit, including basements and attics, but does not include a garage or any other accessory structure, other than ADUs and JADUs.
Packet Page 212
“Multifamily ADU” means either:
1. ADUs established within the potions of multifamily structures previously used as livable space, not exceeding 25 percent of the existing multifamily structures; or
2. Detached single family ADUs on a lot that has existing multifamily dwellings being subject to height limits and 4-foot rear yard setbacks. "Nonconforming zoning condition" means a physical improvement on a property that does not conform to current zoning standards.
"Proposed dwelling" means a dwelling that is the subject of a permit application and that meets the requirements for permitting.
"Public transit" means a location, including, but not limited to, any fixed-route bus stop or other transit stop with transportation that runs on fixed routes, and is available to the public. "Tandem parking" means that two or more automobiles are parked on a driveway or in any other location on a parcel, lined up behind one another.
“Tract housing” is a type of housing development in which multiple similar houses are built on a tract (area) that is subdivided into smaller lots.
“Utility ADU” means an ADU no larger than 800 square feet and meeting four-foot required side and rear yard setbacks.
C. Locations Permitted. Accessory dwelling units are permitted on parcels of any size in conjunction with a proposed or existing residential use in any zone that allows residential uses. Unless specifically stated otherwise, nothing in this Section shall be Packet Page 213
interpreted to render any requirements applicable to the primary dwelling unit(s) on the site inapplicable.
D. Effect of Conforming. An ADU or JADU that conforms to the requirements in this section shall not be:
1. Deemed to be inconsistent with the General Plan and zoning designation for the parcel on which the ADU or JADU is located;
2. Deemed to exceed the allowable density for the parcel on which the ADU or JADU is located;
3. Considered in the application of any ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth; or
4. Required to correct a legally established nonconforming zoning condition.
This does not prevent the City from enforcing compliance with applicable building standards in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 17980.12.
E. Legal use requirements. ADUs and JADUs shall comply with the following:
1. Short-term rental prohibited. Any rental term of an ADU or JADU that was legally created on or after January 1, 2017 shall be longer than 30 days.
2. Sale of units. The accessory dwelling unit may not be sold separately from the existing single-family home or multifamily dwelling except as provided in California Government Code Section 65852.26.
Packet Page 214
F. Exempt Projects. The following Exempt Projects shall not be subject to the requirements set forth in Subsections G and H, below, when said projects are located within a residential or mixed use zoning district; however, these Exempt Projects shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Seaside Building and Fire Codes, including requirements for separation between structures and fire-resistance ratings:
1. One Accessory Dwelling Unit and one Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit per lot with a proposed or existing Single-Family Dwelling if all of the following apply:
a. The Accessory Dwelling Unit or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit is within the proposed space of a Single-Family Dwelling or is within the existing space of a SingleFamily Dwelling or Accessory Structure. If within the space of an existing Accessory Structure, the structure may be expanded a maximum of 150 square feet beyond its existing physical dimensions solely for the purpose of accommodating ingress and egress.
b. The ADU or JADU has its own exterior access without need to travel through the existing or proposed Single-Family Dwelling.
c. The side and rear yard setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety, as determined by the City Building Official and Fire Chief. d. Any JADU complies with the requirements of California Government Code 65852.22, as such may be amended from time to time.
2. One new construction Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit, which may also include a JADU within the same building, on a lot with an existing or proposed Single-Family Dwelling, if all of the following apply:
a. The structure shall be set back a minimum of four feet from the side and rear property lines.
b. The total floor area of the structure shall not exceed 800 square feet. c. The height of the structure shall be limited to no more than the heights specified in Section 17.52.230(G)(2).
3. Multiple Accessory Dwelling Units within the portions of existing buildings used for Multifamily Dwelling Units that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited Packet Page 215
to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages. Spaces converted in this manner must meet applicable Building Code standards for dwelling units. The number of Accessory Dwelling Units created in this manner shall not exceed 25% of the originally existing Multifamily Dwelling Units, except that at least one Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be allowed.
4. Not more than two Detached Accessory Dwelling Units that are located on a lot that has existing Multifamily Dwelling Units, where the Detached Accessory Dwelling Units have a height that does not exceed the heights specified in Section 17-52.230 (G)(2) and are set back a minimum of four feet from all side and rear yard property lines.
G. ADU and JADU design standards. ADUs and JADUs shall comply with the following standards:
1. Maximum Number. One ADU and/or one JADU shall be allowed on each lot or parcel with a residential zoning designation. Multifamily ADUs shall comply with Government Code Section 65852.2.
2. Height limit. Accessory Dwelling Units shall comply with the following:
a. An attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed the maximum height specified for the Zoning District in which the ADU is located or 25 feet, whichever is less.
b. A newly constructed detached ADU shall be limited to one story and shall not exceed a maximum overall height of sixteen feet (16’), except that a detached ADU may be constructed to a height of 18 feet if:
1) The detached ADU is located on a lot with an existing multistory multifamily dwelling unit; or
2) The detached ADU is located within one-half mile of a major transit Packet Page 216
stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, in which case an additional two feet of height is permitted if necessary to align the roof pitch of the ADU with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling.
c. An attached ADU, accessory to a duplex or multifamily, shall be limited to a conversion of existing non-livable space and must maintain the existing height of the structure being converted.
3. Setbacks. ADUs and JADUs shall comply with the setback standards of the primary dwelling(s) for the applicable zone, except that minimum side and rear setbacks of four feet shall be required. A detached ADU shall be located behind the rear building line of the primary residence, and be clearly subordinate by location and size. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
a. Existing Garage. No setback shall be required for an existing, legal, attached or detached garage and/or other existing structure that is converted to an ADU or JADU, or that is demolished and reconstructed in the same location as an ADU.
4. Maximum unit size.
a. The maximum square footage of an ADU shall not exceed 850 square feet for a studio or one-bedroom, and 1000 square feet for units with two or more bedrooms. In no case shall a detached ADU exceed fifty percent of the floor area of the living area of the primary dwelling. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
Packet Page 217
b. The floor area of a JADU shall not exceed a maximum of 500 square feet, and shall be contained within a proposed or existing single-family dwelling or within a converted garage, carport or covered patio. c. The floor area for multifamily ADUs shall comply with Government Code Section 65852.2.
5. Separate entrance required. An attached ADU and/or JADU shall provide a separate exterior access from the existing primary residence. Entry doors cannot be on the same facade as the primary entry/front door of the primary residence and exterior staircases or ramps shall be placed in the area furthest from any property lines if said staircase encroaches into a side or rear yard setback. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
6. Window placement. Windows facing an adjoining residential property shall be designed to protect the privacy of neighbors; alternatively, fencing or landscaping may be required to provide screening. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
7. Addressing. ADUs or JADUs constructed or established on the same parcel or lot as an existing or proposed single-family dwelling shall be distinguished by utilizing the same address numbers as the primary dwelling followed by the letter “B”, then “C”, and so forth. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
Packet Page 218
8. Exterior. ADUs or JADUs proposed in Master Planned Communities, areas regulated by Specific Plans, and any tract housing that obtained approval by the Board of Architectural Review shall substantially conform to the originally approved design elements, such as building materials, architectural style, roof pitch, height, scale, and exterior colors and finishes. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
9. Vehicular Door. A garage converted to an accessory dwelling unit shall include removal or exterior concealment of the garage door(s), which shall be replaced or concealed with a wall meeting Building Code requirements and including architectural treatment and features, including if appropriate walls, doors, windows, trim, and accent details, consistent with the primary dwelling.
This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
10. Lighting Restrictions. Any lighting associated with an ADU or JADU shall be shielded or down-lit and shall not shine onto adjoining properties, while meeting the minimum building code. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this Section.
11. Landscaping. No less than 20 percent of the lot shall be landscaped. All areas of the site that are not utilized for buildings, patios, parking, pedestrian, or vehicular access shall be landscaped and provided with a permanent irrigation system. The front yard shall be landscaped, exclusive of walkways and driveways.
As site conditions allow, and concurrent with each newly established ADU or JADU, a minimum of one (1) tree of not less than (5) gallon size stock, shall be planted upon the same parcel or lot as the ADU or JADU. Upon request, the Zoning Administrator shall provide property owners with a pre-approved list of acceptable Packet Page 219
tree species. The removal or loss of any tree in conjunction with an ADU or JADU shall be replaced with three (3) or more trees of the same species using at least (5) gallon size stock, as determined by the Zoning Administrator, and comply with the requirements of Chapter 8.54.040. All required yards and setback areas shall be attractively landscaped primarily with drought tolerant and native plant materials. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this section.
12. Private Open Space/Patios and Decks. Each ADU or JADU shall have a deck or a patio, directly adjoining individual units. The minimum private open space required for each unit shall be no less than 96 square feet with a minimum width of six feet (6’) for a deck/patio and eight feet (8’) for landscaped area. This requirement shall not prevent the establishment of a Utility ADU that would otherwise comply with all other provisions of this section.
H. Off-street parking requirements. At least one off-street paved parking space shall be provided for an accessory dwelling unit, and may be located within the required interior side or rear property setback areas, or as tandem parking in compliance with Chapter 17.34 (Off-Street Parking).
1. Notwithstanding the above, no additional parking shall be required if one or more of the following conditions applies to the ADU:
a. The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit. b. The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district within which the parking requirement would be inconsistent.
c. The accessory dwelling unit is part of the proposed or existing primary residence or an accessory structure.
Packet Page 220
d. When on-street parking permits are required but have not been offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
e. When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit.
f. When a permit application for an ADU is submitted at the same time as a permit application for a new single-family or multifamily dwelling or dwellings located upon the same lot and the ADU meets any of the criteria specified in this subsection.
2. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an ADU, or converted to an ADU, those off-street parking spaces are not required to be replaced.
3. A new driveway approach or curb cut for an ADU or JADU, if needed, may require a separate encroachment permit from the City’s Engineering Department.
4. Notwithstanding Section 17.34.120(A)(1)(d) of the Seaside Municipal Code, when an existing, legally constructed garage or carport is converted to an ADU or JADU, it is unnecessary to remove any existing driveway access or curb cut that formerly served said garage or carport, provided that the driveway is a minimum of 20 feet in length.
I. Processing. The City shall provide an approval or denial of ADU and/or JADU applications within (60) sixty days from the date such application is deemed complete, unless the applicant requests a processing delay, in which case the sixty-day period is tolled for the period of the requested delay, up to a maximum of 180 days. If a permit application for an ADU or JADU is submitted along with a permit application to create a new primary dwelling on the same parcel or lot, the City may delay acting on the ADU or JADU application until the City permits the new primary dwelling. The City shall deem ADU applications complete that include all of the information and materials required in the application submittal checklist, comply with the provisions of this chapter, and include full payment of applicable review fees.
J. Contents of Applications. An ADU and/or JADU application shall include the following:
1. Completed Residential Building Permit Application;
Packet Page 221
2. Completed Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD) residential water release form and permit application.
3. Plan Set - Signed and Dated (If Required). A single PDF file containing all plan sheets, 24”x 36” minimum size, to include:
a. COVER SHEET: Project address; assessor parcel number; legal property owner’s name, address, phone number; plan preparer’s title and license number (If Applicable), address, phone number; scope of work identifying all work proposed, clearly showing existing and proposed work and descriptions, and demonstrating compliance with all applicable CA codes and regulations, California Building or Residential Code, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Energy, Fire, Green Building Codes and City of Seaside Municipal Code; project data, property type, type of construction, occupancy classification, square footage of existing/remodeled/new proposed structure(s) and addition(s), overall building height, fire sprinkler (Yes / No), number of stories; sheet index; deferred submittal list – trusses, sprinklers, etc. (If Applicable); special inspections noted (If Required); b. SITE PLAN: North arrow; scale; setbacks; lot dimensions; property boundaries; street names; new and existing structures; building footprint and roofline with all projections dimensioned to property lines; gates; walls; fences; driveways; walks; easements; utilities; meter locations; Cal Green Mandatory Measures Checklist legibly reproduced on the plans; site improvements, including grading, drainage, and landscape irrigation;
c. DEMOLITION PLAN (if Applicable): Showing any existing structure(s), or portion(s) of a structure to be removed with floor plan(s) and framing details;
d. FLOOR PLAN (Existing/Proposed): Drawn to scale, dimensioned, rooms labeled, doors and window types, sizes, schedules; framing details; Packet Page 222
e. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: All sides of the exterior of the building; existing & proposed exterior wall finishes and special finishes; roof materials and roof pitches; door, window, skylight, and other openings, locations, materials, and configurations; vertical dimensions showing the height of structure(s) and heights of finished floors; locations and extent of shear walls, let-in bracing, or other methods of shear transfer;
f. FOUNDATION PLAN: Detailed and dimensioned plans showing slabs and foundations for garages, patios, breezeways, driveways, walks; footings, piers, slabs, grade beams, retaining walls (sizes and locations); hold-downs, connections of new foundations to existing foundations; any special construction required by structure, site conditions, or expansive soils; required compressive strength of concrete; crawl access openings and screened vents under raised wood floors; North arrow;
g. ROOF FRAMING PLAN: Size and spacing of beams, rafters, headers, trusses, roof openings; layout of roof sheathing; nailing; North arrow; h. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: Signed and dated; CRC Braced Walls or CBC Shear Walls; schedule (If Modified); Soils Report (If Applicable), signed and dated;
i. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL PLANS: Location of new or existing mechanical equipment serving the added or altered area; electrical plan with receptacles, lighting, and panel schedule (If Modified); gas line diagram and calculations (If Modified); Energy Certificate of Compliance Forms reproduced on plan sheets; and j. Monterey Peninsula Unified School District (MPUSD): Release for any payment of school district fees.
Packet Page 223
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 10.A.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Nick Borges, Acting Police Chief
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE AND ACCEPT A BID NOT TO EXCEED $105,650.00 (YEAR 1) TO PURCHASE FLOCK SAFETY LICENSE PLATE
READER CAMERAS AND SHOT DETECTION WITH AN ANNUAL
RENEWAL COST OF $90,000.00 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A TWO-YEAR RENEWAL
AGREEMENT WITH FLOCK SAFETY
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution to approve the purchase of Flock Safety License Plate Reader cameras and shot detection, not to exceed $105,650.00 and authorize the City Manager to enter into a two-year renewal agreement to maintain the program, not to exceed $90,000.00 (annually).
BACKGROUND
The Seaside Police Department is constantly looking for new opportunities and cutting edge technology to support our public safety measures. One of the most proven effective preventative and investigative tools available to police departments are license plate reader cameras and shot detection.
The Flock Safety Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) system is a deployment of cameras throughout the city to serve as an additional investigative resource for the police department. The Flock Safety lease proposed here would include twenty (25) cameras strategically spread throughout the city. Flock Safety’s camera system captures the date, time, location, license plate number, license plate state, vehicle details (type and color), as well as objects (bicycles, animals, and people). The system also alerts the police department when the system identifies a stolen or wanted vehicle.
The Flock Safety Gunshot Detection system is a deployment of gunshot detection units Packet Page 224
Item No. 10.A. Page 2 of 3
throughout the city to serve as an additional investigative resource for the police department. The Flock Safety lease proposed here would include (1 square mile) gunshot detection strategically placed in the city to capture event information when someone discharges a firearm within the city. Flock Safety’s gunshot detection system captures the date, time, location, and number of rounds fired and alerts the police department in real-time.
The price for Flock safety cameras will increase in April of 2023 from $2,500.00 per camera to $3,000.00, and shot detection will increase from $25,000.00 to $35,000.00.
We recommend City Council approve a 2-year contract to lock us at a lower rate before the price increase takes effect.
Flock Safety provides a desirable approach to deploying ALPR cameras and gunshot detection units throughout the community. Unlike other fixed or mobile ALPR devices, the Flock system provides the ability to cover more areas of the city with system maintenance provided by the vendor rather than staff. The Flock Safety system is an all-inclusive model for deploying the ALPR cameras and gunshot detection units. Flock Safety is the sole manufacturer and developer of the Flock Safety Falcon camera system and the Raven gunshot detection system. There are several other differences between Flock Safety and other ALPR and gunshot detection companies. Most notably, they are the only manufacturer and service provider that leases ALPR services. Compared to others, which require the purchase of equipment. The technology is also different because the Falcon camera system captures motion and not just the license plate.
Multiple surrounding police agencies are investing in Flock Safety, which would increase safety in Seaside and most of our peninsula through accessing data. Flock Safety would only be used for objective investigation and serve as a deterrent to crime. Flock Safety does not share data and all data is only retained for 30 days. Data would only be used for crime vehicles that are uploaded to the database and when investigating crimes.
The system does not capture occupants or personal information. Once purchased, we will implement a policy to support the program and the privacy for those not associated with crime. Flock Safety has data that indicates significant reductions in violent crime throughout the nation.
The Seaside Police Department will not share any data with law enforcement agencies for purposes outside of solving violent crime or locating vehicles on the "hot list" (stolen cars, missing persons, crime vehicles). The system is not designed to capture human beings, nor will the system be used for random checks of vehicles. All inquiries and entries into our system will be login protected and an officer must identify who they are and why they are checking data. We will only maintain data in the cloud for 30 days and we will not authorize Flock Safety to share our data. The intention is to keep Seaside safe through objective, fair and ethical measures.
To continue our efforts in enhancing the safety of our community, we strongly believe Packet Page 225
Item No. 10.A. Page 3 of 3
this technology will deter crime and assist our officers in responding to and solving crime.
FISCAL IMPACT
Startup Cost w/ equipment and installation: $105,650 (25 solo powered LPR cameras and 1 square mile of shot detection)
Annual program costs: $90,000 (after year 1)
Funding source: 221-6120-8184 (CA Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund)
ATTACHMENTS
1. Flock Overview for Cities
2. Flock ALPR FAQs
3. Flock Case Studies - Crime reduction & deterrence
4. Flock Safety ALPR Privacy + Ethics
5. Automated_License_Plate_Readers__ALPRs_ (5)
6. License Plate Readers
7. RESOLUTION NO
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 226
Help your city reduce crime
with cameras that see like a detective
Flock Safety provides an affordable, infrastructure-free automatic license plate reading (ALPR) camera system for cities who want to reduce crime within a principled framework. Unlike traditional ALPR, Flock uses Vehicle Fingerprint™ technology to transform hours of footage into a searchable database to find the single piece of evidence needed, even when a license plate isn't visible.
Not your average security cameras
Infrastructure-Free and Discreet Design
With solar power and LTE connectivity, we
can install the devices almost anywhere.
And the beautiful design means it will blend
in with your city’s aesthetic.
Safety-as-a-Service
We install and maintain the devices, so you
can focus on running the city. That means
we will support you from procurement,
through permitting, and even preparing you
to present this project to the city council.
Vehicle Fingerprint Technology
Your officers can find vehicle evidence by
vehicle type, make, color, license plate
state, missing and covered plates, and other
unique features like bumper stickers,
decals, and roof racks.
“Flock Safety made my job easy. The system was up and running in just a few weeks, and has proven to help our police department find the evidence to solve more crime.”
City Manager in Ohio
Packet Page 227
Join 2500+ cities using Flock Safety
to eliminate crime
“Flock Safety continues to enhance
and help our police department
capture these vehicles and return the
assets to their owners."
-Council member Josh McCurn of Lexington, KY
Public Safety Technology Built with Principles
You own the footage
We won’t share it or sell it. It’s 100% yours for your law enforcement to use to solve crime.
Protect resident privacy
All data automatically deletes by default every 30 days on a rolling basis and is encrypted with AES-256 encryption.
Promote transparency and accountability
Flock provides a transparency portal to share data with your community about how the devices work on an ongoing basis.
Flock requires an investigative reason to search and proactively provides an audit report to city leadership.
Clear pricing and infrastructure free
$2500 per camera / year. All the footage is stored in the cloud at no additional fee and there are no hidden costs.
Protect the Whole Community
It takes all community members working together to eliminate crime, which is why we created a public-private partnership that enables businesses, neighborhoods, schools, and others to partner with your city and police department to build your network.
Packet Page 228
About Automatic License Plate Readers
(ALPR)
The Problem: Violent Crime Is Not Going Away
Nationwide, cities are experiencing a disturbing rise in homicides and violence. The FBI’s 2020 Crime Report shows a 30% increase in homicides from 2019 to 2020, the largest single-year increase recorded.
Over two-thirds of the country's most populous cities saw even more homicides in 2021.
Proactive - ALPR devices provide real-time alerts when a vehicle that is stolen or associated with a known suspect is detected.
Investigative - ALPR cameras help determine whether and which vehicle(s) were at the scene of a crime.
One Solution: Technology that Detects Objective Evidence to Clear More Cases Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR) capture computer-readable images of license plates and vehicles, allowing officers to compare plate numbers against those of stolen cars or wanted individuals on a crime database like the NCIC.
ALPR devices assist law enforcement in solving crime in two ways:
Is ALPR effective ?
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, when employed ethically and objectively, ALPRs are an effective tool for law enforcement, cutting down on the time required for investigations and acting as a force multiplier. In 2011, a study by the Police Executive Research Forum concluded that ALPRs used by the Mesa, Ariz., Police Department resulted in “nearly 3 times as many ‘hits’ for stolen vehicles, and twice as many vehicle recoveries.”
Communities with ALPR systems report crime reductions of up to 70 percent. In some areas, that included a 60 percent reduction in non-residential burglaries, 80 percent reduction in residential burglary, and a 40 percent reduction in robberies.
Packet Page 229
AMBER Alerts: License plate readers in metro Atlanta were able to find a vehicle containing a kidnapped one-year-old, who had been taken from his mother at random off the street. The child was recovered unharmed. Some ALPR systems integrate directly with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children’s AMBER Alert system, sending real-time alerts to officers in seconds. [New information released about 1-year-old’s kidnapping]
Silver Alerts: Knoxville Police were able to locate a missing elderly man who suffers from dementia after he drove away in a family vehicle. ALPR technology has helped solve hundreds of Silver Alerts across the country. [Missing man with dementia found using Flock camera]
Firearm violence: The Las Vegas Trail, a high-crime area in Fort Worth, TX, saw violent crime decrease by 22% in 2021 compared with the first nine months of 2019.
Fort Worth Police attributed this drop partially to the license plate reader system implemented in the neighborhood during the same period of time. [Crime is down 22% in Fort Worth’s Las Vegas Trail. How neighbors and police made it safer] Organized theft: Grafton, a growing village with a bustling retail district, is dealing with increased organized retail theft — Two-thirds of all the crimes reported to Grafton police in 2020 were retail thefts. Grafton Police have implemented a license plate reader system to identify vehicles that have been involved in thefts or have been stolen themselves. In one week alone, they recovered three stolen vehicles with drivers planning to engage in retail theft. [Losses mount as retailers fight theft rings, accuse online storefronts of doing little to stop resale of stolen goods] ALPR Provides Objective Evidence While Protecting Privacy ALPR does not include facial recognition capabilities and does not capture personally identifiable information (PII). While eyewitnesses and individual officers are subject to inherent human bias, ALPR cameras capture wholly-objective images of vehicles and license plates, providing a clear and actionable investigative lead.
ALPR Use Cases Include:
Packet Page 230
Case Studies
Packet Page 231
Castle Rock PD
According to C-MATT, Castle Rock was the only
Metro-Denver City to reduce auto-theft (with a
25% reduction) in 2020 - 2021, they were also the
only Flock Customer
Flock hits resulting in the recovery
of a stolen vehicle or eluding:
● 27% resulted in the recovery of other
stolen property
● 29% led to the seizure of illegal drugs
(966.3 grams)
● 8 guns recovered/seized
● 79 warrants served
● 30% involved a VCT (29 times)
● 5% led to a pursuit and 24 vehicles eluded
Packet Page 232
CASE STUDY Long Term Results
“Word has gotten out about
these ALPR programs, and
folks that are in the business
of stealing cars will typically
do a little bit of research and
find out that a city that has an
ALPR program they then want
to avoid”
-Chief Ian Schmutzler
Vacaville PD Vacaville, CA
33%
Decrease in
Reported
Vehicle Thefts
35%
Increase in
Arrests related
to Vehicle
Thefts
2x
Requested
increase in #
of cameras
Less Vehicle Thefts are
happening in Vacaville, and
more of them are getting solved
Fire apprenticeship, expanded license plate reader
program among budget requests
- The Reporter
Packet Page 233
NCIC Missing Person:
4 Warrants/Subpoenas Served:
55 Missing Persons Recovered:
11 Guns Seized:
25 # of Charges:
246
# of Persons Charged:
97 CASE STUDY: Lexington PD
Lexington PD Lexington, KY
In 3 months with 25 Falcons, the Lexington PD had the following outcomes… Total value of recovered vehicles:
$861,025.00
Total of Success Stories:
98 NCIC Stolen Vehicles:
57 NCIC Warrant:
2 Investigative:
26 Packet Page 234
CASE STUDY: Long Term Crime Reduction
CCPD Cobb County, GA
“[We’re] able to react to crimes
in progress with actionable
evidence obtained quickly and
effortlessly by Flock Safety.”
- Chief VanHoozer
215 Beat
64% Entering Auto
63% Non-Res Burglary
Precinct 2
35% Entering Auto
40% Robbery
Crime reduction prevention
Cobb County drops crime by 60% w/ help of tech
- Fox 5 Atlanta
Packet Page 235
Perth Amboy PD Perth, NJ
Flock ALPR
● Results with 6 months of Flock Safety
○ 7 stolen vehicle recoveries
○ 3 stolen plate recoveries
○ 8 fictitious recoveries
○ 10 arrests
○ Assisted with 30 separate investigations
for SIU
● In a NYC subway shooting in April of 2022,
Flock Safety cameras captured the U-Haul used
by the suspect of the shooting, helping
detective establish a timeline and location of
the suspect that morning prior to the shooting
Suspect Brooklyn subway shooter indicted on
two federal counts, including terror charge
Packet Page 236
CASE STUDY: Violent Crime Reduction
Before Flock Safety,
crime in Dayton was 2.1X the
national average.*
Dayton PD Dayton, Ohio
Result: 46% reduction in
violent crime within target
area after 6 months
Problem
● Violent and non-violent
crime on the rise
● Community members
feel unsafe
Goals
● 29 strategically placed LPR
cameras to capture evidence
that solves crimes
● Proactively reduce crime to
increase quality of life
Packet Page 237
CASE STUDY: Long Term Results
Gwinnett County PD - Central Precinct
Gwinnett County, GA
“2021 is the first time in six years that they
have had under 1,000 entering autos.”
Packet Page 238
CASE STUDY Long Term Results
As the number of
cleared cases
increases, crime
correspondingly
decreases.
San Marino PD San Marino, CA
70%
Decrease in
residential
burglaries
19%
Decrease in
part 1 crimes
36%
Requested
increase in #
of cameras
Police Chief and City Council Attribute
Crime Decrease to More Cases Cleared
With LPR Cameras
Packet Page 239
CASE STUDY Results
30-Day ROI with Flock Safety
First Camera Installed
November 5, 2020
11 Stolen Vehicles
Recovered
November 6, 2020
$496,000
reached in Vehicle
Recoveries
December 1, 2020
49 Arrests Made
November 30, 2020
53 Stolen
Vehicles, 32
Stolen Plates
Recovered
December 4, 2020
WPD Wichita, Kansas
Packet Page 240
CASE STUDY Results
Wichita, KS PD
*Stats are from November 2020 - May 2021
197 vehicles recovered
88 stolen plates
$1.9M in vehicle recoveries
211 arrests, mostly felonies
28 guns seized
1 lb+ of meth
5 lbs+ of marijuana and other
drugs
"One of the most impactful
technologies we've ever
had, period."
“Flat out solving unsolvable
crimes because of it.”
“Systemic type of positivity
about Flock.”
-Lt. Casey Slaughter
Packet Page 241
Case Study: Auto Theft
● Avg # of Recovered Vehicles is 58.5 per year
(past 4 years)
● Since Flock went live (69 days ago) it has
gone up to 89 recovered stolen vehicles
● Average rate of recovered stolen vehicles
over past 4 years is 55.6% since Flock went
live it has gone up to 78.76%
● Flock led to 8 arrests in 69 days
Yakima, PD Yakima, WA
Packet Page 242
About Flock Safety ALPR
Privacy and Ethics Factsheet
Flock Safety data and footage is encrypted throughout its entire lifecycle. All data is securely stored with AES256 encryption with our cloud provider, Amazon Web Services.
On-device, data is only stored temporarily for a short time until it is uploaded to the cloud, at which point it is removed automatically from the local device.
This means the data is secure from when it is on the Flock Safety device to when it is transferred to the cloud, using a secure connection to Flock Safety servers. While stored in the cloud, all data (both footage and metadata) is fully encrypted at rest.
Flock Safety defaults to permanently deleting all data after 30 days on a rolling basis, setting a new standard in the industry.
Flock Safety’s customers own 100% of their data and determine who has access. Flock Safety will never share or sell the data, per our privacy policy.
With explicit written permission from the customer, Flock Safety does have the ability to grant law enforcement access to specific footage for a short period (24 hours, 48 hours, or however long the customer desires) in the event of an investigation following a crime. Access can only be granted through the approval of the customer.
Flock Safety has maintenance software in place to measure device performance and image capture quality. This is used to diagnose issues preemptively and schedule service calls in the event of a device malfunction or emergency.
How does Flock Safety keep devices and data secure?
Flock Safety holds itself to the highest level of security. We have implemented the following security policies and features:
Who has access to data collected by Flock Safety devices? Packet Page 243
About Flock Safety ALPR
Privacy and Ethics Factsheet
Flock Safety stores footage for only 30 days on a rolling basis by default, after which the footage is automatically hard deleted. The only exception to this is if a democratically-elected governing body or official legislates a different data retention period.
While searching for footage or other evidence on the Flock Safety platform, law enforcement agencies must enter reason codes to verify the legitimacy of the search and create an audit trail.
Authorized users go through training to properly use our system and communicate with their dispatch teams.
Flock Safety customers commit not to use the data collected to work with third-party repossession companies, traffic enforcement, revenue collection, unpaid fines, or towing companies. We do not use facial recognition or capture any personally identifiable information such as name, phone number, or address, and we do not work with federal government agencies for immigration enforcement purposes.
Flock Safety’s ALPR Transparency Portal, an optional free feature for all law enforcement customers, is the first public-facing dashboard for law enforcement agencies, city leaders, and local government officials to share policies, usage, and public safety outcomes related to ALPR technology. The ALPR Transparency Portal helps promote transparency and accountability in the use of policing technology in order to build community trust while creating a safer, more equitable society.
How long does Flock Safety keep data?
What features do Flock Safety devices have that enable audits and oversight? Packet Page 244
Policy
422
Seaside Police Department
Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/01/24, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Seaside Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 1 Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
422.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for the capture, storage and use of digital data obtained through the use of Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) technology. 422.2 ADMINISTRATION
The ALPR technology, also known as License Plate Recognition (LPR), allows for the automated detection of license plates. It is used by the Seaside Police Department to convert data associated with vehicle license plates for official law enforcement purposes, including identifying stolen or wanted vehicles, stolen license plates, crimes of violence and missing persons. It may also be used to gather information related to active criminal investigations involving shootings, burglaries, robberies, assaults and other crimes that could aid in the resolution of a criminal matter. All installation and maintenance of ALPR equipment, as well as ALPR data retention and access, shall be managed by the Support Services Bureau Commander. The Support Services Bureau Commander will assign members under his/her command to administer the day-to-day operation of the ALPR equipment and data.
422.3 ALPR ADMINISTRATOR
The Support Services Bureau Commander shall be responsible for developing guidelines and procedures to comply with the requirements of Civil Code § 1798.90.5 et seq. This includes, but is not limited to (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53):
(a) A description of the job title or other designation of the members and who are authorized to use or access the ALPR system or to collect ALPR
information.
(b) Training requirements for authorized users.
(c) A description of how the ALPR system will be monitored to ensure the security of the information and compliance with applicable privacy laws. (d) Procedures for system operators to maintain records of access in compliance with Civil Code § 1798.90.52.
(e) The title and name of the current designee in overseeing the ALPR operation. (f) Working with the Custodian of Records on the retention and destruction of ALPR data.
Packet Page 245
Seaside Police Department
Policy Manual
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/01/24, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Seaside Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 2 (g) Ensuring this policy and related procedures are conspicuously posted on the department's website.
422.4 OPERATIONS
Use of an ALPR is restricted to the purposes outlined below. Department members shall not use, or allow others to use the equipment or database records for any unauthorized purpose (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53):
(a) An ALPR shall only be used for official law enforcement business. (b) An ALPR may be used in conjunction with any routine patrol operation or criminal investigation.
Reasonable suspicion or probable cause is not required before using an ALPR as the ALPR is designed to regularly alert our officers to vehicles already entered into the system (stolen cars, amber alert related vehicles, etc).
(c)ALPR may be used to canvass license plates around any crime scene areas as suspect vehicles often flee the area after a crime.
(d) No member of this department shall operate ALPR equipment or access ALPR data without first completing department-approved training.
(e) No ALPR operator may access any data unless otherwise authorized to do so. All members of the is department are required to have a purpose to check data that is directly related to an investigation.
(f) Officers shall verify an ALPR response through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) before taking enforcement action that is based solely on an ALPR alert absent exigent circumstances See below for response to ALPR and shot detection alerts.
422.5 DATA COLLECTION AND RETENTION
The Support Services Bureau Commander is responsible for ensuring systems and processes are in place for the proper collection and retention of ALPR data. Data will be transferred from vehicles to the designated storage in accordance with department procedures. All ALPR data downloaded to the server should be stored for no more than 30 days. ALPR data should be purged unless it has become, or it is reasonable to believe it will become, evidence in a criminal or civil action or is subject to a discovery request or other lawful action to produce records. In those circumstances the applicable data should be downloaded from the server onto portable media and booked into evidence.
Packet Page 246
Seaside Police Department
Policy Manual
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/01/24, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Seaside Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 3 Data will also be evaluated for misreads and other errors to insure officers are not taking any enforcement action based upon incorrect alerts. Patterns of misreads will be sent to Flock Safety for review and correction.
422.6 ACCOUNTABILITY
All data will be closely safeguarded and protected by both procedural and technological means.
The Seaside Police Department will observe the following safeguards regarding access to and use of stored data (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53):
(a) All ALPR data downloaded to the mobile workstation and in storage shall be accessible only through a login/password-protected system capable of documenting all access of information by name, date and time (Civil Code § 1798.90.52).
(b) Members approved to access ALPR data under these guidelines are permitted to access the data for legitimate law enforcement purposes only, such as when the data relate to a specific criminal investigation or department-related civil or administrative action. (c) ALPR system audits should be conducted on a regular basis. For security or data breaches, 422.7 POLICY
The policy of the Seaside Police Department is to utilize ALPR technology to capture and store digital license plate data and images while recognizing the established privacy rights of the public.
All data and images gathered by the ALPR are for the official use of this department. Because such data may contain confidential information, it is not open to public review. 422.8 RELEASING ALPR DATA
The ALPR data may be shared only with other law enforcement or prosecutorial agencies for official law enforcement purposes or as otherwise permitted by law, using the following procedures:
(a) The agency makes a written request for the ALPR data that includes:
1. The name of the agency.
2. The name of the person requesting.
3. The intended purpose of obtaining the information.
(b) The request is reviewed by the Support Services Bureau Commander or the authorized designee and approved before the request is fulfilled.
Packet Page 247
Seaside Police Department
Policy Manual
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/01/24, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Seaside Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 4 (c) The approved request is retained on file. All requests from federal agencies pertaining to immigration status related matters are unauthorized and are to be denied. 422.9 TRAINING
The Support Services Commander should ensure that members receive department-approved training for those authorized to use or access the ALPR system (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53).
422.10 ALPR, SHOT DETECTION AND POLICE RESPONSE
Shot detection technology utilizes acoustic microphones to measure gunshot sounds. ALPR alerts officers through their Mobile Data Computers of vehicles that are stolen and wanted for criminal related matters. Officers should always respond to matters in a professional, composed and reasonable manner. This technology should only be used as a tool to alert police and it is our duty to confirm the alerts through dispatch when feasible.. Without a known victim and suspect information, responding to an alert in an amplified manner can create hostile encounters with potential community members who may have no involvement with a crime. Officers are to ensure all members of our community are treated equally and with dignity and respect; even during tense situations. Officers should respond safely and take proper steps to verify alerts in a professional and composed manner.
Packet Page 248
Packet Page 249
Packet Page 250
Packet Page 251
Packet Page 252
Packet Page 253
Packet Page 254
Packet Page 255
Packet Page 256
RESOLUTION NO. 23-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE TO APPROVE AND ACCEPT A BID NOT TO EXCEED $105,650 TO
PURCHASE FLOCK SAFETY LICENSE PLATE READER CAMERAS AND SHOT
DETECTION AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A YEARLY AGREEMENT TO MAINTAIN THE PROGRAM NOT TO EXCEED $90,000
ANNUALLY
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside approves the purchase of Flock Safety license plate reader cameras and shot detection; and
WHEREAS, the City Council provided conceptual approval and funding for the vehicle purchase with the approval of the 2022/2023 Fiscal Year Budget; and WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a yearly agreement with Flock Safety to maintain the program based upon the need; and WHEREAS, the cameras and shot detection will only be used to assist the Seaside Police Department in solving criminal or serious matters governed by the City of Seaside Police Department Policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the purchase Flock Safety ALPR cameras and shot detection equipment and authorize the City Manager to execute a two-year agreement for a total amount not to exceed $195,650.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 16th day of February by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
________________________
Ian Oglesby, Mayor
City of Seaside
ATTEST:
_________________________
Dominque Davis, City Clerk
Packet Page 257
CITY OF SEASIDE
STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 10.B.
TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Nisha Patel, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Leslie Llantero, Assistant Engineer
DATE: February 16, 2023
SUBJECT: RECEIVE UPDATE ON THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT, AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 5 YEAR
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION POLICY AND STREET LIST FOR
THE FY 2022/23 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the 2022 Pavement Management Program Final Report, and adopt a resolution approving a 5 Year Pavement Rehabilitation Policy and approve a street list for the FY 2022/23 Pavement Rehabilitation Project.
BACKGROUND
With the passage of Measure X in Monterey County and the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Act (RMRA or SB1) in the state, the City of Seaside is estimated to receive $1.5M per year. These two funding revenue sources come with new accountability measures. Both Measure X and SB1 require jurisdictions to develop a Pavement Management Program (PMP) and roads to be maintained with RMRA funds require submittal to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for approval. An essential tool to remain eligible for grant funding is to update and implement our Pavement Management Program (PMP). The purpose of the PMP is to track inventory, store work history and furnish budget estimates to optimize funding for improving the condition of the City pavement network system.
On September 16, 2021, the City retained Pavement Engineering Inc, (PEI) to update the PMP. PEI has extensive experience in implementing and updating PMPs for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC, a SF Bay Area transportation agency), cities, and the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) to help maximize allocated funding.
Packet Page 258
Item No. 10.B. Page 2 of 7
PEI updated the PMP which included an evaluation of the condition of each roadway throughout the city, updated the maintenance and rehabilitation strategy and associated costs, and performed budget needs analysis for long-term and short-term analysis periods. The 2022 Pavement Management Program Update Final Report was completed by PEI in December 2022.
PEI inventoried and evaluated the condition of each roadway pavement, 79 centerline miles, and assigned a value to the observed road condition to represent the estimated degradation of the road. This is represented as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), from 0 to 100 in the roads database StreetSaver where 0 is the worst condition of pavement and 100 is the best. The current overall systemwide average PCI of the City pavement network is 59. The breakdown by functional classification of the street is provided in Table A below. Agencies try to keep the arterial streets in better condition because they carry the bulk of the traffic and load, then collectors, and then residential streets. However, as seen in the table below, residential streets are the largest category of streets in the City of Seaside and have the lowest PCI of 52.
Table A.
Functional
Classification
Centerline
Miles
Lane Miles Pavement
Area
Percent of
System
Average PCI
Arterial 15.37 37.00 3,279,931 24.17% 75
Collector 17.86 37.31 3,543,818 26.12% 61
Residential 42.11 73.70 6,425,775 47.35% 52
Other Alley 3.92 3.92 319,862 2.36% 27
Total 79.26 151.93 13,569,386 100.00% 59
The analysis performed as part of the program update identified that 41% of the City pavement is in excellent to good condition and that 51% is in fair to poor condition.
Table B.
CONDITION PCI RANGE % OF TOTAL SQUARE FEET CL MILES
Excellent 100-90 7.98 1,084,989 6.32
Good 90-71 32.63 4,436, 491 25.86
Fair 70-51 20.52 2,789,972 16.26
Poor 50-31 31.13 4,232,972 24.67
Failed 30-0 7.74 1,052,358 6.13
100% 13,596,356 79.26
This is further illustrated in the bar graph in Figure 1. which shows a breakdown of the system into 10 point PCI ranges, by functional classification. This shows that while the overall PCI is 59, the pavement system needs a mix of both maintenance treatments and rehabilitation treatment. Maintenance treatments include slurry and cape seals, Packet Page 259
Item No. 10.B. Page 3 of 7
micro-surface seals with dig-outs, and thin overlays typically for roadways with a PCI value between 90-51. Costs for these treatments range from $7 to $37 per square yard. Rehabilitation treatments include thick overlays, pavement milling/filling, and full depth reclamation typically for roadways with a PCI value between 70-26. Costs of these treatments range from $67 to $280 per square yard. The overlap in PCI between these types of treatments depends on load related pavement distress. Each street is categorized based upon the pavement distress and assigned a PCI.
Figure 1.
PEI performed a budget needs analysis under both short-term and long-term analysis periods. The Budget Needs Analysis identified road sections that need treatment and recommended a maintenance and rehabilitation strategy for each road section. The costs were then summed up for the entire period. This formed the basis for the proposed list of streets for upgrading based upon selected budget scenarios. The summary of the scenarios is as follows:
Packet Page 260
Item No. 10.B. Page 4 of 7
Figure 2.
The available City funding for the current fiscal year is $2.4 million and approximately $1 million per year thereafter. At this funding level, the PCI is expected to drop to 49 by fiscal year 2026/2027 (illustrated in orange above). As illustrated in the graph above and based upon the estimated funding forecast, the city would have to invest an additional $82.6 million in the first year and an additional $1.3 million per year thereafter to reach an optimum PCI of 82. Similarly, to maintain the current PCI of 59, the city would need to invest an additional $3.6 million for the first year and an additional 4.8 million per year thereafter (or a total of $6.8 million per year).
Due to the limited funding available, it is important to optimize available funding with a pavement rehabilitation strategy that is cost effective that will maximize the service life of the road. For the past several years, the City has focused on pavement rehabilitation of arterial and collector streets (attachment 3). Staff is now proposing a policy to focus pavement rehabilitation on residential street through a five-year policy, described in detail below. And, the goal is for the City to repair streets before they get to the next Packet Page 261
Item No. 10.B. Page 5 of 7
more expensive level of repair.
Pavement Rehabilitation Policy
A Pavement Rehabilitation Policy (Policy) will guide staff for the next five years to maximize estimated available funds allocated for pavement and maintenance rehabilitation projects based upon the pavement conditions and previous council direction. The previous pavement rehabilitation project focused on collector and arterial street segments with an approximate rehabilitation budget of $10 million dollars. The proposed Policy focuses work on residential streets for the next five years.
Residential streets have the lowest PCI and are the majority of the city roadways, having a total of 42 centerline miles. The estimated available funding for pavement rehabilitation projects for the next 5 years is approximately $6.4 million, funded through Measure X and SB1.
Staff recommends allocating 80% of the funds to residential maintenance and rehabilitation treatment projects for years 1, 2, 4, and 5. The 3rd year of available funds, estimated to be $1 million, is allocated to residential pavement reconstruction treatment projects. Twenty percent (20%) of the available funds for the first year is allocated to residential reconstruction treatment projects and for years 2, 4, and 5 is allocated to arterial/collector streets for a combination of maintenance and rehabilitation treatment projects.
Table C.
80% 20%
Year Fiscal Year Estimated
Available
Funding
Residential
Critical
Points*
Arterial/
Collector
Critical
Points*
Residential
Reconstruction
1 2022/ 2023 $2.4 M $2,040,000 - $480,000
2 2023/ 2024 $1 M $800,000 $200,000 -
3 2024/ 2025 $1 M - - $1,000,000
4 2025/ 2026 $1 M $800,000 $200,000 -
5 2026/ 2027 $1 M $800,000 $200,000 -
Totals $4,440,000 $600,000 $1,480,000
* A critical point is a PCI value that will in time decrease such that the cost of applying a maintenance treatment increases significantly.
Over the next five years, the recommended Policy will help preserve important investments the city has made in the City street network over the last several years and help address some of the pavement needs going forward. The Policy will provide an estimated $4.44 million in residential pavement rehabilitation projects, approximately $600,000 in arterial and collector pavement rehabilitation projects, and approximately $1.48 million in residential street reconstruction projects.
Packet Page 262
Item No. 10.B. Page 6 of 7
Table D. below is the proposed street list of pavement rehabilitation for the FY 2022/23 Pavement Rehabilitation Project adhering to the proposed 5 year pavement rehabilitation policy:
Table D.
Street Name Begin Location End Location Lanes PCI Recommended Treatment
Total Cost
Flores Pl Waring St Flores St 1 51 Light
Rehabilitation
$28,997.02
Flores St Broadway
Ave
Mingo Ave 2 40 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$368,244.00
Flores St Mingo Ave La Salle Ave 2 32 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$609,687.00
Grandview
St
Luxton St Ord Grove
Ave
2 33 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$259,392.00
Grandview
St
Ord Grove
Ave
Circle 2 14 Reconstruction $349,943.55
Harding St Broadway
Ave
Elm Ave 1 39 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$106,786.90
Harding St Mingo Ave Broadway
Ave
1 34 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$222,915.00
Lincoln St San Pablo
Ave
La Salle Ave 1 31 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$148,610.00
Waring St Hibly Ave Sonoma Ave 1 53 Light
Rehabilitation
$198,436.00
Waring St Sonoma Ave Broadway
Ave
1 53 Light
Rehabilitation
$157,704.40
Total $2,450,715.8
7 Staff recommends that the City Council receive the 2022 Pavement Management Program Update Final Report, and adopt a resolution approving the proposed 5 Year Pavement Rehabilitation Policy and street list for the FY 2022/23 Pavement Rehabilitation Project as described above.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. The FY 2022/2023 Pavement Rehabilitation Project budget of $2.4M is identified in the adopted FY 2022/23 Budget and is funded with a combination of Measure X and SB 1 funds.
ATTACHMENTS
Packet Page 263
Item No. 10.B. Page 7 of 7
1. Resolution
2. 2022 PMP Update Final Report
3. Pavement Rehabilitation Project Map
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 264
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING A FIVE YEAR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION POLICY, AND A LIST OF STREETS FOR THE FY 2022/23 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT WHEREAS, the Policies and Project Descriptions for the Transportation Safety & Investment Plan promulgated by the Transportation Agency of Monterey County (the TAMC Measure X Master Plan) requires Measure X funding to be used exclusively for transportation improvements; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2017, the City of Seaside entered into the Measure X Funding Agreement between the Transportation Agency of Monterey County (TAMC) and the City of Seaside (the Measure X Funding Agreement); and WHEREAS, eligible project costs for Measure X funding include all conceptual studies, project development costs, right-of-way acquisition, construction costs and any other costs needed to deliver the projects; and
WHEREAS, the Measure X Funding Agreement requires that all projects proposed to receive Measure X reimbursements must be developed under a Pavement Management Program; and
WHEREAS, the update to the Pavement Management Program was performed by Pavement Engineering Incorporated and completed in December 2022; and WHEREAS, a Five Year Pavement Rehabilitation Policy (Policy) was developed to guide staff for the next five years to maximize funds allocated for pavement rehabilitation based upon the pavement conditions and council direction; and WHEREAS, with previous pavement rehabilitation projects, the city allocated approximately $10 million in funds for arterial and collector pavement rehabilitation projects; and
WHEREAS, residential streets have the lowest pavement condition index (PCI) and make up the majority of the city’s roadway; and
WHEREAS, the Policy focuses spending the majority of available funding on Packet Page 265
residential estimated to be $6.4 million over the next 5 years.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Seaside hereby approves the 5 Year Pavement Rehabilitation Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Seaside hereby approves the street list attached hereto as Exhibit B for the 2022/2023 Pavement Rehabilitation Project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council duly held on the 16th day of February 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
Packet Page 266
Exhibit A
5 Year Pavement Rehabilitation Policy
Fiscal Year FY 2022/23 – FY 2026/27
Purpose
The 5-Year Pavement Rehabilitation Policy is created to guide staff for the next five years to maximize allocated funds for pavement and maintenance rehabilitation projects based upon the pavement conditions and council direction. The previous pavement rehabilitation projects (2016 through 2022) focused on collector and arterial street segments with an approximate rehabilitation budget of $10 million dollars. The next five years will focus on residential streets. Based upon the latest Pavement Management Program Update, residential streets have the lowest PCI and are the majority of the city roadways, with a total of 42 centerline miles. The estimated available funding for pavement rehabilitation projects for the next 5 years is approximately $6.4M funded through Measure X and SB1.
Policy
Allocate 80% of available funds for residential maintenance and rehabilitation treatment projects for years 1, 2, 4, and 5. The 3rd year of available funds, estimated to be $1 million, is allocated to residential pavement reconstruction treatment projects. Twenty percent (20%) of the available funds for the first year is allocated to residential reconstruction treatment projects and for years 2, 4, and 5 to arterial/collector streets for a combination of preventative maintenance and rehabilitation treatment projects. The table below illustrates the allocations described above:
80% 20%
Year Fiscal Year
Estimated Available
Funding Residential
Critical Points
Arterial/Collector
Critical Points
Residential
Reconstruction
1 2022/2023 $2.4 M $2,040,000 $ 0 $480,000
2 2023/2024 $1.0 M $800,000 $200,000 $ 0
3 2024/2025 $1.0 M $ 0 $ 0 $1,000,000
4 2025/2026 $1.0 M $800,000 $200,000 $ 0
5 2026/2027 $1.0 M $800,000 $200,000 $ 0
Totals $4,440,000 $600,000 $1,480,000
Packet Page 267
Exhibit B
FY 2022/23 Pavement Rehabilitation Project
Street List
Street Name Begin
Location
End Location Lanes PCI Recommended
Treatment
Total Cost
Flores Pl Waring St Flores St 1 51 Light
Rehabilitation
$28,997.02
Flores St Broadway
Ave
Mingo Ave 2 40 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$368,244.00
Flores St Mingo Ave La Salle Ave 2 32 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$609,687.00
Grandview
St
Luxton St Ord Grove
Ave
2 33 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$259,392.00
Grandview
St
Ord Grove
Ave
Circle Ave 2 14 Reconstruction $349,943.55
Harding St Broadway
Ave
Elm Ave 1 39 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$106,786.90
Harding St Mingo Ave Broadway
Ave
1 34 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$222,915.00
Lincoln St San Pablo
Ave
La Salle Ave 1 31 Heavy
Rehabilitation
$148,610.00
Waring St Hilby Ave Sonoma Ave 1 53 Light
Rehabilitation
$198.436.00
Waring St Sonoma Ave Broadway
Ave
1 53 Light
Rehabilitation
$157,704.40
$2,450,715.87
Packet Page 268
CITY OF SEASIDE
You can ride on our reputation
Pavement Engineering Inc.
2022 Pavement
Management Program Update
Final Report
December 2022
Packet Page 269
THE CITY OF SEASIDE
2022 Pavement Management Program Update
Table of Contents
Section Description
I. Executive Summary
Introduction
Work Performed
Findings
Budget Analysis
Conclusions and Recommendations
II. Background
Pavement Design Basics
Pavement Deterioration
Typical Pavement Defects
Pavement Maintenance Treatments
Pavement Rehabilitation Treatments
III. Pavement Management Program Specifics
Background (StreetSaver)
Program Assumptions
Pavement Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Units Costs Annual Pavement Maintenance/ Rehabilitation Program
Visual Evaluations
Program Updates
IV. Reference Reports
Street Name Alphabetical Listing
Street List PCI High to Low
PCI Condition Map
Appendix A Summarized System Information
Network Summary Statistics
Network Replacement Cost
Decision Tree
Appendix B Budget Scenarios
Needs Analysis & Zero Budget
Increase PCI by 5
Maintain 59 PCI
Current Budget
Appendix C Definitions
Packet Page 270
Section I
Executive Summary
Packet Page 271
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City of Seaside currently maintains approximately 79.26 centerline miles of roads representing 13,569,386 square feet of pavement with a replacement value of approximately $360,657,000 as calculated by StreetSaver®.
Pavement Engineering Inc. (PEI) updated all the streets in the City’s Pavement Management Program, using the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC) StreetSaver® program. The purpose of a Pavement Management Program is to track inventory, store work history and furnish budget estimates to optimize funding for improving the city’s pavement system.
INTRODUCTION
A Pavement Management Program has several distinctive uses:
• As a budgeting tool, a Pavement Management Program uses treatment costs that are based on recently bid projects, by the participating agency, so that budgets reflect historical costs for the area.
• As an inventory tool, a Pavement Management Program provides a quick and easy reference for pavement areas and use.
• As a pavement condition record, a Pavement Management Program provides age, load-related, non-load related and climate-related pavement condition and deterioration information. The Pavement Management Program uses pavement deterioration curves, based on nationwide research, which allow the program to predict a pavement’s future condition.
A Pavement Management Program is not capable of providing detailed engineering designs for a street. The Pavement Management Program instead helps the user identify candidate streets for potential repair and maintenance. Project level pavement analysis and engineering is an essential feature of future pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Additional investigation, or project level analysis, can optimize the City’s pavement management dollars. Project level engineering examines the pavements in significantly more detail than the visual evaluation required for the Pavement Management Program Update and optimizes designs for all of the peculiar constraints of a set of project streets.
Packet Page 272
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 3
WORK PERFORMED
Pavement Distress Survey and Database Update
For this update, PEI performed inspections on approximately 79.58 centerline miles of road. Field inspections were completed in November 2021.
PEI measured the following distress types as part of our review: alligator cracking (fatigue), block cracking, distortions, longitudinal & transverse cracking, patching & utility cut patching, rutting / depressions, weathering, and raveling. All the collected data was entered into the City’s StreetSaver® database.
As part of our field review, all the streets were measured to confirm lengths and widths.
Lengths were measured using a vehicle-mounted electronic measuring device and widths were measured using a hand-held measuring wheel. Measurement discrepancies were tabulated and reviewed with the City to determine if corrections were needed.
PEI performed a quality control (QC) check on our work. PEI’s QC check consists of performing a field review of any street segment where the PCI showed a decrease of 3 or more points per year, or an increase of 1 PCI without a documented M&R treatment, when compared to the last inspection for the same road segment in the StreetSaver® database. Each segment in the QC process was visually reviewed to determine if the StreetSaver® calculated PCI was representative of the observed overall pavement condition for that road segment. Variations found were re-inspected by a Senior Engineering Technician, or the Project Manager, and the segments’ PCI was recalculated.
FINDINGS
The updated Pavement Management Program showed that the City's overall average PCI is 59.
The breakdown by functional classification is as follows:
Functional
Classification
Centerline
Miles Lane Miles
Pavement
Area
(sq. ft.)
Percent of
System Average PCI
Arterial 15.37 37.00 3,279,931 24.17% 75
Collector 17.86 37.31 3,543,818 26.12% 61
Residential 42.11 73.70 6,425,775 47.35% 52
Other (Alley) 3.92 3.92 319,862 2.36% 27
Totals 79.26 151.93 13,569,386 100.00% 59
Packet Page 273
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 4
The pie graph below shows the percentage of each functional classification, by area.
The bar graph below shows the City’s Street system broken down into 10-point PCI ranges.
100-91 90-81 80-71 70-61 60-51 50-41 40-31 30-21 20-11 10-0 7.98% 18.37% 14.26% 9.81%10.71% 16.57% 14.56% 5.88%
1.81% 0.04%
1,083,134 2,493,306 1,934,832 1,331,164 1,453,534 2,248,877 1,976,586 798,669 246,260 5,724
Area (SqFt)
PCI Range
Total System by Functional Class by PCI
Arterials
Collectors
Residentials
Alleys
Arterials
3,279,931
24.2%
Collectors
3,543,818
26.1%
Residentials
6,425,775
47.4%
Alleys
319,862
2.4%
Avg. PCI: 52
Avg. PCI: 75
Avg. PCI: 61
Avg. PCI: 27
Packet Page 274
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 5
The breakdown by Condition Category and corresponding PCI range is shown below:
Condition Category Breakdown
Condition PCI Range % Of Total Square Feet
Excellent 100-91 7.98% 1,083,134
Good 90-71 32.63% 4,428,138
Fair 70-51 20.52% 2,784,698
Poor 50-31 31.13% 4,225,463
Failed 30-0 7.74% 1,050,653
The analysis shows that 53.14% of the City's pavement are in Good to Fair condition.
Details of each street segment are provided in Section IV: Reference Reports.
BUDGET ANALYSIS
StreetSaver® uses a decision tree to model the decision-making process that agencies follow to select a maintenance or rehabilitation strategy. The decision tree contains "branches" for each functional classification, surface type and condition category.
Jurisdictions can outline their maintenance and rehabilitation strategy by choosing a treatment for each branch.
The treatments listed in the decision tree are generalized to provide a range of treatments.
Typical treatments within each generalized treatment range are listed below. The exact treatment would need to be determined during the design phase of the project.
StreetSaver® assigns a treatment action and estimated cost to each street segment based on the pavement's current PCI.
Packet Page 275
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 6
Treatment Category Typical Treatment
Light Maintenance • Slurry Seal or Micro-Surface
• Fog Seal or Scrub Seal
Heavy Maintenance
• Chip Seal, Cape Seal
• Slurry Seal or Micro-Surface with Digouts
• Thin Maintenance Overlay (TMO)
Light Rehab. • Overlay (2” and under) or Thin Mill and Fill Heavy Rehab.
• Overlay (greater than 2”) or Thick Mill and Fill
• Cold-In-Place Recycling
• Full Depth Reclamation
• Pulverize and Resurfacing
Reconstruct • Full Section Reconstruction
Decision Tree Unit Prices
As a minimum, recent bid tabulations should be used to determine the appropriate unit costs. Further, the unit costs include other costs such as design, construction management, contingencies or other related construction costs (ADA ramps, curb & gutters, striping etc.) to form a more comprehensive unit cost for the selected treatments.
For the City of Seaside, the unit costs on the following table were used:
Treatment Arterial Collector Residential
Cost/ Sq Yd
Crack Seal ($$/LF) $3.15 $2.80 $2.45
Light Maintenance $9.10 $8.19 $7.35
Heavy Maintenance $37.26 $26.54 $23.14
Light Rehab $78.33 $72.74 $67.13
Heavy Rehab $120.14 $102.11 $86.81
Reconstruct $280.50 $247.50 $214.50
Packet Page 276
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 7
For this update, PEI analyzed several scenarios, which are summarized below:
Budget Scenario Projections
PEI generated Five (5) scenario projections which are represented graphically below:
A summary of each of the scenario projections are as follows:
Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget/ Funds Needed to obtain Optimum PCI ($85.0M for FY 22/23, $2.3M/Yr Avg. for FY 23/24 – FY 26/27.) Scenario 2: Amount of funding to increase PCI by 5 (Avg. $10.4M/Yr.) Scenario 3: Amount of funding to maintain PCI of 59 (Avg. $6.8M/Yr.) Scenario 4: Impact of the current funding amount (~$2.4M FY 22/23, ~$1M/Yr FY 23/24 – FY 26/27) the current PCI would decline from 59 to 49, a 10-point overall drop.
Scenario 5: Represents the impact to the PCI if Zero dollars are spent The full report for the various budget scenarios can be found in Appendix B. 82 64
59 59
49 46 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 95
- FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27
PCI Range
Year
5 Year Projections
(S1) System Needs
$85M Yr 1,
$2.3M/Yr 2-5 Avg.
(S2) Increase PCI by 5
$10.4M/Yr Avg.
(S3) Maintain 59 PCI
$6.8M/Yr Avg.
(S4) Current Budget
FY 22/23 ~$2.4M
FY 23/24-26/27 ~$1M/Yr
(S5) Zero Budget
Packet Page 277
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 8
Budget Consequences
The following graphs illustrate the consequences to the City’s overall weighted PCI and Deferred Maintenance Amount, based on the scenario projections:
At the current funding level of ~$2.4M for FY 22/23, and ~$1M/Yr for FY 23/24 – FY 26/27, the PCI of the entire system will deteriorate from 59 to 49, an 10 PCI point drop over the next 5 years. In addition, the backlog of deferred maintenance grows from $79.2 million to $122.7 million, an increase of 55%.
$79.2M $88.9M $99.7M $112.8M $122.7M
59 56
54 51
49 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
$-
$20.0
$40.0
$60.0
$80.0
$100.0
$120.0
$140.0
FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27
PCI
Deferred Maintenance
($ Millions)
Year
Scenario 4 - Budget Consequences
Current Budget (FY22/23 ~$2.4M, FY23/24-26/27 ~$1M/Yr)
Deferred Maintenance Pavement Condition Index
Packet Page 278
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 9
To maintain the current PCI of 59, it is projected that an average funding level of $6.8M/Yr is necessary. At this funding level the backlog of deferred maintenance grows from $83.4 million to $99.9 million, an increase of 20%.
To increase the PCI 5 points from 59 to 64, it is projected that an average funding level of $10.4M/Yr is necessary. At this funding level the backlog of deferred maintenance grows from $81.3 million to $82.6 million, an increase of 2%. $83.4M $87.0M $92.5M $98.8M $99.9M
59 59 59 59 59
45 50
55 60
65 70
75 80
85 $-
$20.0
$40.0
$60.0
$80.0
$100.0
$120.0
$140.0
FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27
PCI
Deferred Maintenance
($ Millions)
Year
Scenario 3 - Budget Consequences
Maintain 59 PCI (Avg. $6.8M/Yr)
Deferred Maintenance Pavement Condition Index
$81.3M $82.2M $84.3M $85.0M $82.6M
60 61 62 63 64
45 50
55 60
65 70
75 80
85 $-
$20.0
$40.0
$60.0
$80.0
$100.0
$120.0
$140.0
FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27
PCI
Deferred Maintenance
($ Millions)
Year
Scenario 2 - Budget Consequences
Increase PCI by 5 ($10.4M/Yr Avg.)
Deferred Maintenance Pavement Condition Index
Packet Page 279
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 10
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This Executive Summary provides a review of the 2022 Pavement Management Program Update performed by PEI. PEI inspected all road segments in the City of Seaside. The average overall PCI for the City is 59. 53.14% of the City's pavement is in Good to Fair condition.
To maintain the system at its current overall PCI of 59, the City will need to spend an average of $6.8 million annually over the next 5 years. Maintaining the current funding level of approximately $2.4M for FY 22/23, and $1M/Yr. for FY 23/24 – FY 26/27 will result in a PCI loss of 10 points in 5 years to a PCI of 49.
A review of the City’s street system, by functional classification, shows that the Arterial streets have the highest average PCI of 75, the Collector streets have an average PCI of 60, and the Residential streets have an average PCI of 52. As a general rule, agencies typically try to keep their arterials in the best condition because they carry the bulk of the traffic and loading, followed by collectors, then the residential/ local streets.
Moving forward, PEI recommends the City carefully evaluate the overall annual budget to determine the amount it wants to commit to pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. We recommend the City set priorities for each functional classification and perhaps certain streets within each classification. It can be beneficial to have a 5 year Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation plan, where Years 1 and 2 are set and selected, allowing the engineering and design process to start. Then every 2 years update the plan moving Years 3-5 forward and incorporating any modifications that may have been found necessary.
This Pavement Management Program will assist the City in its efforts to monitor treatments and track their effectiveness and help the City in setting future priorities and treatment policies. To ensure the city is evaluating accurate data, PEI suggests the City update its Pavement Management Program on a regular basis and review the entire system every two to three years, this includes a thorough review of the Decision Tree and the unit costs contained within. As the City maintains and updates its Pavement Management Program, the program will become a valuable tool in its efforts to maximize performance and minimize the spending for pavements.
Packet Page 280
Section II
Background
Packet Page 281
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 12
BACKGROUND
This section is intended to introduce important pavement design definitions and calculations as a background for understanding the Pavement Management Program (PMP) assumptions.
PAVEMENT DESIGN BASICS
Pavements are a structural support system generally considered to act like a beam. But unlike beams in buildings, which generally have static loads, the pavement structure is flexed many times from traffic loading. Cars and light trucks have little impact on the pavement structure. Larger/Heavier trucks have very significant impacts on the pavement due to the high axle weights. The impact of trucks is measured in equivalent single 18,000-pound axle loads (EALs). The total EALs are converted into a design Traffic Index (TI). As an example, a design TI of 5 is equal to 7,160 EALs. A Design TI of 8 is equal to 372,000 EALs. Therefore, the design TI is the total number of EALs that the pavement will support before it begins to fail, regardless of the passage of time. Normally for a new pavement, the EALs over a 20-year period are used. For rehabilitation treatments such as overlays, 10 years is generally used.
The other element of pavement design is the support of the beam. The support is provided by the sub-grade soils. The support value is designated by the R-value test.
Using the design TI and R-value, the pavement designer chooses various materials to construct the structural section. The most common pavement section is a thin layer of asphalt concrete over aggregate base(s). Many options are available depending on specific project requirements and conditions.
The Design Life of a pavement is the period of time that a pavement is engineered, or planned, to perform at a satisfactory level. The Service Life of a pavement is the actual amount of time that a pavement performs at that satisfactory level. The design methods used in California are based on a 50 percent reliability rate. So, the average service life, of all pavements constructed using those design procedures, will be the design life. This generally means that about half of the pavements will not last the full design life and the other half will last longer than the design life. Therefore, the expected service life of a pavement is generally expressed in a range of years. For a pavement with a 20-year design life, the expected service life of that pavement will be 17 to 23 years.
PAVEMENT DETERIORATION
Pavement deteriorates from two processes, Fatigue and Aging, which occur simultaneously. In a well-designed and constructed pavement, the two processes result in the need to rehabilitate the pavement at approximately the same time. This is called the design life. The design life for most new pavements is 20 years. Each deterioration process has its own set of pavement defects, which are related to the process.
Packet Page 282
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 13
Fatigue
The first deterioration process, fatigue, is caused by heavy axle loads. As the pavement structure flexes or bends from heavy wheel loads, the asphalt concrete layer’s ability to flex is consumed. With enough bending, the asphalt concrete layer begins to break at the bottom. These cracks progress upward until they reach the surface and appear as alligator cracking. These areas are repaired by removal and replacement of the asphalt concrete in the affected areas. These repairs are commonly called digouts.
As the pavement structure, its supporting soils, and the precise loading from wheel loads vary, so does the time it takes for alligator cracking to appear. As alligator cracking appears, the pavement should be repaired with digouts. Generally, when the total cumulative quantity of digouts reaches approximately 10 percent, or more, of the total area, the pavement is considered to have reached its service life and requires major rehabilitation.
Aging
The major element of the pavement structure that ages is the asphalt concrete layer. To a minor extent, aggregate bases can age if contaminated by fine soil particles, which are transported from the subsoil into the aggregate base.
Asphalt Concrete (AC) pavement is composed of aggregates and asphalt binder. The aggregates used are generally of fair quality and will experience some breakdown over time. Aggregate aging problems need to be addressed with maintenance treatments. As the asphalt binder ages, it loses volume through the loss of volatile components in the asphalt. As the volume decreases, or shrinks, the pavement will progressively crack from the resulting tensile strain in the layer. Normally, these cracks first show up as transverse cracks. They also show up in weak areas, such as paving joints. These cracks widen and increase over time until the pavement has a checkerboard appearance.
The aging process also causes the pavement to become more brittle. The increased stiffness results in additional cracking from loaded vehicles. This load induced cracking from the brittleness of the asphalt concrete is very similar to fatigue cracking in appearance.
The major agent for deterioration of the asphalt concrete binder is oxygen, whose carrier is water. Water enters the pavement either from the surface or as water vapor from underneath.
TYPICAL PAVEMENT DEFECTS
StreetSaver® identifies eight different Asphalt Concrete distress types. These are:
1. Alligator Cracking (Fatigue)
2. Block Cracking
3. Distortions
4. Longitudinal and Transverse
Cracking
5. Patching and Utility Cut Patching
6. Rutting and Depression
7. Raveling
8. Weathering
Packet Page 283
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 14
These defects are common to virtually the entire pavement as aging progresses.
For purposes of understanding the levels of these distresses, the condition level descriptions from the ASTM D6433 “Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys” are included herein:
Alligator Cracking (Fatigue)
Description:
Alligator or fatigue cracking is a series of interconnecting cracks caused by fatigue failure of the asphalt concrete surface under repeated traffic loading. Cracking begins at the bottom of the asphalt surface (or stabilized base) where tensile stress and strain are highest under wheel load. The cracks propagate to the surface initially as a series of parallel longitudinal cracks. After repeated traffic loading, the cracks connect, forming many sided, sharp-angled pieces that develop a pattern resembling chicken wire or the skin of an alligator. The pieces are generally less than 0.6 m (2 ft) on the longest side.
Alligator cracking occurs only in areas subjected to repeated traffic loading, such as wheel paths. Therefore, it would not occur over an entire area unless the entire area were subject to traffic loading (pattern-type cracking that occurs over an entire area not subjected to loading is called “block cracking,” which is not a load-associated distress).
Severity Levels:
L Fine, longitudinal hairline cracks running parallel to each other with no, or only a few interconnecting cracks. The cracks are not spalled.
M Further development of light alligator cracks into a pattern or network of cracks that may be lightly spalled.
H Network or pattern cracking has progressed so that the pieces are well defined and spalled at the edges, with some pieces rocking under vehicle traffic.
Image 1: Alligator Cracking
Packet Page 284
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 15
Block Cracking
Description:
Block cracks are interconnected cracks that divide the pavement into approximately rectangular pieces. The blocks may range in size from approximately 0.3 by 0.3 m (1 by 1 ft) to 3 by 3 m (10 by 10 ft). Block cracking is caused mainly by shrinkage of the asphalt concrete and daily temperature cycling (which results in daily stress/strain cycling). It is not load-associated. Block cracking usually indicates that the asphalt has hardened significantly. Block cracking normally occurs over a large portion of the pavement area, but sometimes will occur only in non-traffic areas. This type of distress differs from alligator cracking in that alligator cracks form smaller, many-sided pieces with sharp angles. Also, unlike block cracks, alligator cracks are caused by repeated traffic loadings and therefore found only in traffic areas (i.e., wheel paths).
Severity Levels: (*See definitions of longitudinal transverse cracking.) L Blocks are defined by low-severity* cracks.
M Blocks are defined by medium-severity* cracks.
H Blocks are defined by high-severity* cracks.
Image 2: Block Cracking
Packet Page 285
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 16
Distortions
Description:
Distortions are usually caused by corrugations, bumps, sags and shoving. They are localized abrupt upward or downward displacements in the pavement surface, a series of closely spaced ridges and valley or localized longitudinal displacements of the pavement surface. Distortions affect ride quality.
Severity Levels:
L Distortion produces vehicle vibrations, which are noticeable, but no reduction in speed is necessary for comfort or safety and/or individual distortions cause the vehicle to bounce slightly but create little discomfort.
M Distortion produces vehicle vibrations, which are significant, and some reduction in speed is necessary for safety and comfort.
H Distortion produces vehicle vibrations, which are so excessive that speed must be reduced considerably for safety and comfort.
Image 3: Distortions
Packet Page 286
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 17
Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking (Non-PCC Slab Joint Reflective) Description:
Longitudinal cracks are parallel to the pavement’s centerline or laydown direction. They may be caused by:
1. A poorly constructed paving lane joint.
2. Shrinkage of the AC surface due to low temperature or hardening of the asphalt and/or daily temperature cycling.
3. A reflective crack caused by cracking beneath the surface course, including crack in PCC slabs.
4. Decreased support or thickness near the edge of the pavement.
Transverse cracks extend across the pavement at approximately right angles to the pavement centerline or direction of laydown. These may be caused by conditions (2) and (3) above. These types of cracks are not usually load-associated.
Severity Levels:
L One of the following conditions exists:
(1) Non-filled crack where the width is less than 10 mm (3/8 in.) or (2) filled crack of any width, where crack filler in satisfactory condition.
M One of the following conditions exists:
(1) non-filled crack width is greater than or equal to 10 mm and less than 75 mm (3/8 to 3 in.)
(2) non-filled crack is less than or equal to 75 mm (3 in.) surrounded by light and random cracking, or
(3) filled crack is of any width surrounded by light random cracking.
H One of the following conditions exists:
(1) any crack filled or non-filled surrounded by medium or high severity random cracking,
(2) non-filled crack greater than 75 mm (3 in.) or
(3) A crack of any width where approximately 100 mm (4 in.) of pavement around the crack is severely broken.
Image 4: Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking
Packet Page 287
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 18
Patching and Utility Cut Patching
Description:
A patch is an area of pavement that has been replaced with new material to repair the existing pavement. A patch is considered a defect no matter how well it is performed (a patched area or adjacent area usually does not perform as well as an original pavement section). Generally, some roughness is associated with this distress.
Severity Levels:
L Patch is in good condition and satisfactory. Ride quality* is rated as low severity or better.
M Patch is moderately deteriorated and/or ride quality* is rated as medium severity.
H Patch is badly deteriorated and/or ride quality* is rated as high severity.
Needs replacement soon.
*Ride quality is defined in the severity levels of distortions.
Image 5: Patching and Utility Cut Patching
Packet Page 288
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 19
Rutting and Depressions
Description:
A rut is a surface depression in the wheel paths. Pavement uplift may occur along the sides of the rut, but in many instances, ruts are noticeable only after a rainfall when the paths are filled with water. Rutting stems from a permanent deformation in any of the pavement layers or sub-grades, usually caused by consolidated or lateral movement of the materials due to traffic load. Significant rutting can lead to major structural failure of the pavement.
Depressions are localized areas where the pavement structure is lower than the surrounding area, but the transition is not abrupt enough to be considered a distortion.
They are often referred to as “bird baths”.
Severity Levels: (Average Rut or Depression Depth)
L 1/2" to less than 1” (13 to 25mm).
M 1” to less than 2” (25 to 50mm).
H equal to or greater than 2” (over 50mm).
Image 6: Rutting and Depressions
Packet Page 289
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 20
Raveling
Description:
Raveling is the dislodging of coarse aggregate particles. Raveling may be caused by insufficient asphalt binder, poor mixture quality, insufficient compaction, segregation, or stripping.
Coarse aggregate refers to the predominant coarse aggregate size of the asphalt mix, and aggregate clusters refers to when more than one adjoining coarse aggregate piece is missing. If in doubt about a severity level, three representative areas of one square yard each (square meter) should be examined and the number of missing aggregate particles/clusters is counted.
Severity Levels:
M Considerable loss of coarse aggregate greater than 20 per square yard (square meter), and/ or clusters of missing coarse aggregate are present.
H Surface is rough and pitted, and it may be completely removed in places.
Image 7: Raveling
Packet Page 290
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 21
Weathering
Description:
Weathering is the wearing away of the asphalt binder and fine aggregate matrix.
Coarse aggregate refers to predominant coarse aggregate size of the asphalt mix. Loss or dislodging of coarse aggregate is covered under Raveling. Surface wear is normally caused by oxidation, inadequate compaction, insufficient asphalt content, excessive natural sand, surface water erosion, and traffic. Weathering occurs faster in areas with high solar radiation.
Severity Levels:
L Asphalt surface beginning to show signs of aging which may be accelerated by climatic conditions loss of fine aggregate mix is noticeable and may be accompanied by fading of the asphalt color. Edges of the aggregates are beginning to be exposed (less than 0.05 inches or 1 mm).
M Loss of the fine aggregate matrix is noticeable and the edges of the coarse aggregate have been exposed up to 1/4th of the width (of the longest side) of the coarse aggregate due to the loss of fine aggregate matrix.
H Edges of the coarse aggregate have been exposed greater than 1/4th of the width (of the longest side) of the coarse aggregate. There is considerable loss of fine aggregate matrix leading to potential or some loss of coarse aggregate.
Image 8: Weathering
Packet Page 291
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 22
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE TREATMENTS
Pavement maintenance treatments are designed to slow the pavement aging process.
Mainly, the treatments are designed to protect the pavement from the adverse effects of water and to some extent vehicle traffic.
Maintenance treatments, which protect the pavement from aging, are crack sealing, digouts, slurry seals, and cape seals. When pavements have extensive cracking and are beyond their design life, interim holding measures including skin patches and thin overlays are used as a stop gap prior to major rehabilitation.
The following outlines some of the more common types of maintenance treatments:
Crack Sealing
Crack sealing prevents surface water from getting beneath the asphalt concrete layer into the aggregate bases. Crack sealing is generally performed using hot rubberized crack sealing material. The procedure includes routing small cracks, cleaning and sealing.
Digouts
Digouts are small areas of deteriorated pavements, which are removed and replaced with new asphalt concrete. Pavement removal is accomplished by cold planning or saw cutting and excavation. New asphalt is installed in at least two lifts. The digout depth is determined depending on the street type and construction.
Slurry Seals
Slurry seals consist of a combination of fine aggregate and emulsified oil. A new type of slurry seal called Rubberized Asphalt Slurry (RAS) is in the development stage. Currently, the cost of RAS is 2 to 3 times as much as a conventional slurry seal, which makes the product economically unattractive. Slurry seals are used when the existing pavement surface is severely raveled.
Cape Seals
Cape seals consist of a chip seal over coated with a slurry seal. A chip seal is an application of small angular rock (chips) approximately 1/4" to 3/8” in a maximum size embedded into a thick application of asphalt emulsion. Most chip seals incorporate polymer modified binders.
Cape seals are used on residential and collector streets to maintain a pavement, which may need an overlay, but there are not sufficient funds available. Cape seals are placed over low to moderate alligator cracks and block shrinkage cracking. Due to the distress covered by the cape seal, small areas of disbanding or failure may occur and will require patching.
Packet Page 292
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 23
Cape sealed surfaces are fairly coarse compared to new paving. Due to this characteristic, they may not be acceptable to some residential areas.
Interim Holding Measures (or “Stop Gap” in StreetSaver® Terms) Interim holding measures or stop gap treatments are used to “hold” the pavement together until funds become available for major rehabilitation. Common holding measures used include skin patches and thin overlays.
Skin patches are thin lifts of fine asphalt concrete placed over deteriorated areas.
Thin maintenance overlays are placed to hold the surface together. The asphalt concrete layer is generally 1 to 1-1/2 inches thick. A 3/8 inch aggregate is used with a rubberized asphalt binder, where the rubber has been mixed into solution with the asphalt binder during the refinement process. This is referred to as Terminally Blended Asphalt Rubber Binder.
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION TREATMENTS
Pavement rehabilitation consists of treatments used to restore the existing pavement quality or to add additional structural support to the pavement. Rehabilitation treatments include conventional overlays; pulverization and resurfacing; ARHM (asphalt rubber hot mix) overlays; AC removal and replacement (Mill and Fill); and reconstruction.
The following outlines some of the more common types of rehabilitation treatments:
Conventional Overlays
Conventional overlays generally consist of surface preparation and varying thicknesses of asphalt concrete. Surface preparation can consist of crack filling, pavement repairs of base failures and leveling courses.
The overlay thickness is determined by the structural requirement of the deflection analysis and reflective cracking criteria. The reflective cracking criteria requires the thickness of the overlay to be a minimum 1/2 the thickness of the existing bonded layers.
Pavement fabric can account for 0.10 ft of asphalt for reflective cracking criteria if the structural requirements from the deflection analysis are met.
Conventional overlays have an expected service life of 7 to 13 years if they are designed to meet structural and reflective cracking criteria and are well constructed.
Packet Page 293
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 24
Pulverization and Resurfacing
Pulverization and resurfacing is an alternative to conventional overlays for streets that are structurally adequate but exhibit sufficient cracking to warrant improvement to the asphalt surface.
Pulverization and resurfacing are an intermediate step between overlays and reconstruction. The existing asphalt concrete is recycled into aggregate base and the recycled base increases the total structural section. The surface is re-graded to conform to flush facilities similar to the way the pavement is keycut for overlays. The re-grading allows for some improvement to the cross section and profile. This method eliminates the stress history and cracking of the old asphalt concrete pavement, thus eliminating negative impacts on the new asphalt concrete surface.
Some instability can be encountered when the pulverization method is used. PEI typically recommends budgeting 5 to 10 percent of the pulverized sub-grade area for stabilization.
Stabilization can be performed using 6-inch deep lift asphalt concrete.
Pulverization and resurfacing has a life expectancy of 13 to 18 years. The life expectancy is slightly less than full reconstruction because some residual deficiencies in thickness or quality of the unaffected layers may still exist. Additional testing is necessary to determine if pulverization is a viable alternative. This testing includes measuring the existing structural section and testing the native soil for bearing capacity (R-value).
RHMA Overlays
Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (RHMA) is a material that uses crumb rubber mixed with traditional asphalt binders to produce a more flexible paving material than conventional dense graded hot mix asphalt (HMA).
Caltrans has developed design criteria for use of this material based on accelerated performance testing using its dual wheel accelerated pavement testing equipment. The Caltrans criteria allows RHMA to be used in a one to two ratio to conventional hot mix asphalt. Thus 1 inch of RHMA is equal to 2 inches of conventional hot mix asphalt for reflective cracking criteria.
RHMA costs approximately 1-3/4 times as much as conventional asphalt and provides a similar service life to that of conventional hot mix asphalt, 7 to 13 years. RHMA is generally only feasible when vertical constraints such as curb and gutter restrict the thickness of the overlay. RHMA typically has more open surface than conventional hot mix asphalt and is more difficult to obtain a high-quality finished product.
Packet Page 294
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 25
AC Removal and Replacement (Mill and Fill)
On some thick asphalt concrete pavements, the most economical approach to rehabilitating the pavement is to remove some of the existing asphalt concrete surface, which matches the existing profile. The replacement material can be either conventional hot mix asphalt (HMA) or RHMA, depending on the design criteria.
In other cases, due to drainage or other physical constraints, additional thickness cannot be placed. If the underlying base is sufficient to support anticipated loading, the asphalt layer can be removed and replaced. Depending on existing conditions, this method should have a life of 15 to 20 years.
Reconstruction
When the pavement has severe cross section deficiencies or requires significant structural strengthening, reconstruction may be the only alternative. Generally, existing pavement materials are recycled and incorporated into the new pavement structure.
Structural section material alternatives include treated soils, full depth asphalt concrete, recycled materials and Portland cement concrete.
Packet Page 295
Section III
Pavement Management Program Specifics
Packet Page 296
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 27
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SPECIFICS
This section discusses the characteristics of the Pavement Management Program and its application for the City of Seaside.
BACKGROUND (STREETSAVER)
During the early years of Pavement Management software development, many companies developed private software packages focused on management of municipal street systems. Though these programs were versatile and sophisticated, the user was also dependent upon the software vendor for training, program updates, and software servicing. Many of the vendors had difficulty maintaining their software, leaving agencies stranded after making a substantial investment.
In 1982, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) completed a study of local road and street maintenance needs and revenue short falls in the San Francisco Bay Area. The results of the study indicated that local jurisdictions were spending only 60 percent of funds required to maintain roads in a condition considered adequate. This indicated a need to improve pavement maintenance and rehabilitation techniques and practices. A committee was formed to evaluate pavement management efforts. At approximately the same time, six public works directors reviewed a proposal to develop a prototype Pavement Management Program (PMP); however, it was felt that the proposed system was too complex. This group strongly emphasized that simplicity was the most important objective to be developed in a PMP if it was to be adopted and used by cities and counties.
In 1983, a consultant was retained to assist MTC in determining PMP needs, PMP resources, and problems. In addition, they were to develop three basic elements of a standardized prototype PMP: a pavement condition index (PCI), effective maintenance treatments for the Bay Area, and a network level assignment procedure. The result was the first version of the MTC PMP. Since that time the program has evolved into StreetSaver.
Today, MTC uses StreetSaver to help local cities and counties better allocate resources, predict the future condition of their pavements at different levels of funding, and demonstrate the effects of underfunded road programs. The Bay Area was one of the first regions in the country to implement a Pavement Management Program that is used by nearly all of its localities. Using StreetSaver, cities and counties can plan and manage road improvement projects, document budget needs and shortfalls, and use the collected data to build support for additional transportation funding.
Packet Page 297
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 28 StreetSaver manages a collection of related data organized for easy storage and retrieval. The StreetSaver program includes a database comprised of several sets of related data ("tables") that contain information about the street network in the jurisdiction.
This information includes pavement condition, the available maintenance/rehabilitation treatments and their costs, and the history of the network. Based on this information, budget analyses are performed. A budget analysis allows the user to project network maintenance and rehabilitation needs, and costs to evaluate the consequences of various budget allocation alternatives. Alternatives can be evaluated in terms of maintenance and rehabilitation that can actually be performed, future pavement condition, and deferred costs. For some agencies, use of the StreetSaver program is cyclical. For others, pavement management is integrated into an ongoing effort to manage their street networks.
Implementation
There are several steps involved in implementing an effective Pavement Management Program. These tasks should be completed on a periodic basis. These tasks include:
1. Collect pavement condition and maintenance/rehabilitation data.
2. Enter re-inspection data and/or applied maintenance and rehabilitation information.
3. Check/update maintenance treatment definitions and pavement category definitions.
4. Calculate Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
5. Evaluate system and current Maintenance/Rehabilitation strategies. Determine Budget needs and if necessary, develop alternate Budget Summaries.
6. Present analysis outputs to funding bodies.
7. Acquire funds and apply maintenance/rehabilitation treatments.
PROGRAM ASSUMPTIONS
The goal of the Pavement Management Program is to furnish budgetary amounts in order to achieve system wide improvements in the overall pavement condition. The goal of project engineering is to obtain the proper structural affect, for the lowest financial amount, for a given subset of the network to be maintained. Using the Pavement Management Program, management is able to realistically budget for economically maintaining the City’s pavement Network. Annually updating maintenance activity and costs keeps the program current.
Packet Page 298
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 29
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION (M&R) UNIT COSTS The reliability and accuracy of any PMP is based on the information contained in its Decision Tree. The listed treatments in the Decision Tree are generalized to provide a range of treatments. The exact treatment would need to be determined during the design phase of a project.
Typical treatments within each generalized treatment range are listed in table 3 below.
Based on a street segment’s current PCI condition, StreetSaver® assigns a treatment action and estimated cost to perform the suggested treatment. This cost is not just what is paid to the contractor but should include all the “Soft Costs” incurred by the City.
Soft Costs can include the surface preparation, engineering cost, materials testing, and construction inspection. Even if these tasks are done “in-house”, the inclusion in combination with the construction costs will tend to show the “true picture” of the cost of a specific project.
The following costs were used to develop the indicated budget numbers for each street segment PEI reviewed. The costs include, but are not limited to, miscellaneous work such as transitions, striping, and digouts.
The costs are averages. Small systems will have higher unit costs and large systems will have lower unit costs. The larger the annual project size, the better the economies of scale. Timing is also important. Bidding the work in early spring will result in significantly lower prices than bids solicited in the late summer or fall. If small packages are used, costs could be 25 to 50 percent higher.
Treatment Category Typical Treatment
Light Maintenance • Slurry Seal or Micro-Surface
• Fog Seal or Scrub Seal
Heavy Maintenance
• Chip Seal, Cape Seal
• Slurry Seal or Micro-Surface with Digouts
• Thin Maintenance Overlay (TMO)
Light Rehab. • Overlay (2” and under) or Thin Mill and Fill Heavy Rehab.
• Overlay (greater than 2”) or Thick Mill and Fill
• Cold-In-Place Recycling
• Full Depth Reclamation
• Pulverize and Resurfacing
Reconstruct • Full Section Reconstruction
Table 3: General Treatment Categories with Typical Treatments Packet Page 299
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 30 To account for potential ADA Curb Ramp repairs that may be triggered by applying a maintenance or rehabilitation treatment to a street section, the unit costs include a 25% increase for the Arterials, Collectors, and Residentials. The unit costs also include a 25% allowance to account for “Soft Costs”. As well as a 15% contingency. These prices are in today’s dollars (2022) and do not account for inflation.
Treatment Arterial Collector Residential
Cost/ Sq Yd
Crack Seal ($$/LF) $3.15 $2.80 $2.45
Light Maintenance $9.10 $8.19 $7.35
Heavy Maintenance $37.26 $26.54 $23.14
Light Rehab $78.33 $72.74 $67.13
Heavy Rehab $120.14 $102.11 $86.81
Reconstruct $280.50 $247.50 $214.50
Table 1: General Treatment Unit Costs used in Seaside’s StreetSaver® Database.
Decision Trees / Treatment Strategies
The Decision Trees are broken down into two main areas; Preventive Maintenance (PM) and Rehabilitation. StreetSaver® makes preventive maintenance a top priority. The longer a segment can be kept in good condition the lower the overall cost of its treatments.
Preventive Maintenance addresses the sections that have a PCI of 71 and greater. This area is further broken down to specific treatments that could be better termed as Crack Sealing, Surface Treating and Restoration Treatments.
The Decision Tree allows the user to program these treatments on a cyclical basis. As part of this cyclical process, once a road has reached the point where it can no longer be maintained by a crack seal or a surface seal the program will shift to a Restoration Treatment. The program uses this treatment to restore the pavement in long term budgeting scenarios to the Very Good category.
The Decision Tree for Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation was reviewed with the City of Seaside and updated by PEI. The decision tree customizes the logic for how and what maintenance and rehabilitation treatments StreetSaver® selects.
Five general pavement treatment categories were used to account for the various treatments in the decision tree: Reconstruction, Heavy Rehabilitation, Light Rehabilitation, Heavy Maintenance, and Light Maintenance. Specifying a general Packet Page 300
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 31 treatment category allows the user to stay focused on a budget level analysis rather than moving to a project level analysis.
The PMP software assumes average construction and material quality. Pavement life is very sensitive to materials and workmanship quality. Poor quality new construction may result in up to a 50 percent loss in the pavement life. In other words, poor quality new construction may last 10 to 15 years, whereas excellent quality construction may last 20 to 30 years. Investing in quality, both in design and construction, provides significant returns in extended pavement life resulting in lowered annual maintenance costs.
The Decision Tree for the City of Seaside can be found in Appendix A of this report.
ANNUAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE / REHABILITATION PROGRAM
The PCI range of 0 to 100 is broken down into five condition categories for budget calculation purposes. StreetSaver default PCI breakpoints were used during the 2021/2022 Update of the City of Seaside’s Pavement Management Program.
The default breakpoints are as follows:
PCI BREAKPOINTS
Arterials Collectors Residentials
100 I100 I100 I
90 LIGHT MAINTENANCE
90 LIGHT MAINTENANCE
90 LIGHT MAINTENANCE
70 70 70 II III II III II III
(Non-Load) (Load) (Non-Load) (Load) (Non-Load) (Load)
HEAVY
MAINTENANCE LIGHT REHAB HEAVY MAINTENANCE LIGHT REHAB HEAVY MAINTENANCE LIGHT REHAB 50 50 50 IV IV IV
HEAVY REHABILITATION. HEAVY REHABILITATION HEAVY REHABILITATION 25 25 25
V V V
0 RECONSTRUCT 0 RECONSTRUCT 0 RECONSTRUCT
Figure 3: PCI Breakpoints
When a pavement section is identified for maintenance or rehabilitation, a user defined network-level cost category for a pavement of that functional class, type and condition is used to determine the needed funds for that section.
Packet Page 301
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 32 For sections falling within the preventive maintenance category, or category one (1), a time sequence is used to identify the appropriate treatment and cost. For those sections falling into a rehabilitation category, or categories two (2), three (3), four (4), or five (5), the PCI is used to determine the repair category for a pavement section.
The repair category is combined with functional classification (as a surrogate for traffic index) and surface type (as a surrogate for structural adequacy) to identify the appropriate treatment and cost. The treatment and cost identified for the section is a network-level budget planning treatment and is generally considered as a cost category for budgeting purposes rather than an actual treatment. Some sections will require more money than estimated, some will require less. A project-level analysis is used to determine the actual treatment to be used for a given section based on condition, structural capacity and other factors.
The funding needs are summed for all sections needing work for each year of the analysis period to determine the annual budget needs. The needs analysis provides a list of sections needing work over the selected analysis period and an estimate of the funds needed. In StreetSaver, this analysis period is 5 years. It identifies maintenance and rehabilitation needs without considering funding constraints, i.e. the Needs Analysis is unconstrained by the available budget. StreetSaver identifies candidate sections and funds needed to provide the level of service to meet agency-defined goals.
When an agency has a considerable backlog of maintenance and repair needs, the firstyear needs will include the bulk of sections needing work. From a funding standpoint, this may appear unrealistic; however, the needs analysis is only the first step in planning and programming. The information from the needs analysis is generally best presented to management as the total 5 year needs or the average needs per year of the 5-year period. Few agencies will be able to meet the first year needs as developed by the program.
The StreetSaver® Needs Analysis provides information on the condition of the network over the analysis period with and without application of the treatments. Since the application of treatments assume no limit on funds, this can be considered the upper limit of condition that could be reached by the agency and the condition without treatment can be considered the lower limit.
StreetSaver® uses a ranking process based on cost-effectiveness concepts. Basically, the longer a pavement is in good condition, the more benefit the user gets from the pavement. This can be approximated by the area under the PCI vs Time curve.
The larger that area, the longer the pavement provides the desired level of service. That area is divided by annualized costs per unit area. This ratio is weighted for different usage so that arterial streets are selected for repair before collectors in the same condition, Packet Page 302
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 33 which are selected for repair before residential/locals in the same condition. Sections of pavements that provide the best service for the least money are then selected as those that should be repaired first. StreetSaver provides a ranked listing based on this costeffectiveness analysis. StreetSaver also shows the condition with and without treatment, the estimated costs for each section, the calculations used to determine the ranking, and a listing of sections not recommended for treatment.
VISUAL EVALUATIONS
PEI’s technical staff evaluated all of the streets. The Visual Evaluations of the streets were performed in accordance with the process described in ASTM D6433 using MTC’s Modified pavement distresses described in Section II: Background, of this report. Once the data was entered into the program, PEI completed a quality assurance review of the system and verified the results in the field. The street inventory was based on visual evaluations.
PROGRAM UPDATES
The Pavement Management Program is a dynamic program. It is expected that the City will continue to visually rate their street network and update their StreetSaver® database at least every three years. In addition to the visual review, the City should update the database by adding new streets incorporated into the City, as well as any maintenance or rehabilitation treatments applied to any particular street segment.
Packet Page 303
Section IV
Reference Reports
Packet Page 304
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition 1STAVE 1ST AVE 10 1ST ST LIGHTFIGHTER DR R A 2 2,139 29 62,031 11/10/2021 61 70-61 Fair (70-51) 1STAVE 1ST AVE 20 LIGHTFIGHTER DR GIGLING RD R A 2 1,378 39 53,742 11/10/2021 37 40-31 Poor (50-31)ABRACT ABRAHAM CT 10 LINCOLN ST NAPA ST R S 2 240 32 7,680 11/03/2021 39 40-31 Poor (50-31)ABRACT ABRAHAM CT 20 NAPA ST END R S 2 230 25 5,750 11/03/2021 40 40-31 Poor (50-31)ALHAST ALHAMBRA ST 10 HAMILTON AVE SONOMA AVE R S 2 218 32 6,976 11/04/2021 19 20-11 Failed (30-0)ALHAST ALHAMBRA ST 15 SONOMA AVE ELM AVE R S 2 501 35 17,535 11/04/2021 54 09/01/1984 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)ALHAST ALHAMBRA ST 25 ELM AVE BROADWAY AVE R S 2 515 31 15,965 11/04/2021 26 09/01/1984 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)ALHAST ALHAMBRA ST 30 BROADWAY AVE PONDEROSA AVE R S 2 480 36 17,280 11/04/2021 24 30-21 Failed (30-0)ALYNOAMDR ALLEY N/O AMADOR 10 CONTRA COSTA ST CALAVERAS ST O S 1 1,310 16 20,960 11/12/2021 19 20-11 Failed (30-0)ALYNOAMDR ALLEY N/O AMADOR 110 TERRACE ST END OF PAVEMENT O S 1 1,110 15 16,650 11/15/2021 32 40-31 Poor (50-31)ALYNOBRD ALLEY N/O BROADWAY 10 DEL MONTE BLVD SANTA BARBARA ST O S 1 1,800 16 28,800 11/12/2021 33 10/01/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)ALYNOCHRLS ALLEY N/O CHARLES 10 CANYON DEL REY FREMONT BLVD O S 1 615 15 9,225 11/12/2021 27 05/01/1982 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)ALYNOCLEMT ALLEY N/O CLEMENTINA 10 FREMONT BLVD WINTON ST O S 1 1,036 17 17,612 11/12/2021 47 05/01/1982 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)ALYNOELM ALLEY N/O ELM 10 IMPERIAL ST CALAVERAS ST O S 1 1,775 16 28,400 11/12/2021 25 05/01/1982 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)ALYNOELM ALLEY N/O ELM 110 W/O SAN LUCAS ST NOCHE BUENA O S 1 1,082 15 16,230 11/12/2021 28 05/01/1982 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)ALYNOELM ALLEY N/O ELM 50 FREMONT BLVD EAST END AT GATE O S 1 110 15 1,650 04/22/1999 67 05/01/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)ALYNOHAMTN ALLEY N/O HAMILTON 10 TERRACE ST NOCHE BUENA O G 1 1,376 15 20,640 0 10-0 Failed (30-0) ALYNOHARCT ALLEY N/O HARCOURT 10 PROSPECT ST NOCHE BUENA O S 1 1,375 15 20,625 11/12/2021 31 40-31 Poor (50-31) ALYNOHIBY ALLEY N/O HILBY 10 VIRGINIA ST SIDDAL ST O S 1 932 18 16,776 11/12/2021 15 20-11 Failed (30-0)ALYNOHIBY ALLEY N/O HILBY 110 PROSPECT ST NOCHE BUENA O S 1 1,560 15 23,400 11/12/2021 17 20-11 Failed (30-0)ALYNOOLYMP ALLEY N/O OLYMPIA 10 FREMONT BLVD WINTON ST O S 1 1,130 15 16,950 11/12/2021 33 40-31 Poor (50-31)ALYNOPLM ALLEY N/O PALM 10 PALM AVE CALAVERAS ST O S 1 1,610 16 25,760 11/12/2021 42 05/01/1982 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)ALYNOPLM ALLEY N/O PALM 110 W/O SAN LUCAS ST NOCHE BUENA O S 1 1,000 15 15,000 11/12/2021 27 05/01/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)ALYNOPLM ALLEY N/O PALM 50 FREMONT BLVD EAST END AT PARKING LOT O P 1 180 15 2,700 0 10-0 Failed (30-0) ALYNOSONMA ALLEY N/O SONOMA 10 CANYON DEL REY BLVD CALAVERAS ST O S 1 2,270 15 34,050 11/12/2021 18 05/01/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 20-11 Failed (30-0) ALYNOSONMA ALLEY N/O SONOMA 110 TERRACE ST 115' W/O SAN LUCAS ST O G 1 600 12 7,200 0 10-0 Failed (30-0) ALYNOSONMA ALLEY N/O SONOMA 120 115' W/O SAN LUCAS ST 137' E/O SAN LUCAS ST O S 1 252 12 3,072 11/12/2021 9 10-0 Failed (30-0)ALYNOSONMA ALLEY N/O SONOMA 130 137' E/O SAN LUCAS ST NOCHE BUENA O G 1 597 12 4,068 0 10-0 Failed (30-0)ALYNOTRINY ALLEY N/O TRINITY 10 NOCHE BUENA SAN LUCAS ST O G 1 715 11 7,865 0 10-0 Failed (30-0)ALYNOTRINY ALLEY N/O TRINITY 20 SAN LUCAS ST TERRACE ST O S 1 730 15 10,950 11/05/2021 16 20-11 Failed (30-0) ALYNOWILL ALLEY N/O WILLIAMS 10 MARIN FREMONT BLVD O S 1 800 15 12,000 11/12/2021 26 05/01/1982 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)ALLSST ALLSTON ST 10 HARCOURT AVE TRINITY AVE R S 2 231 32 7,392 11/15/2021 75 80-71 Good (90-71)ALTACT ALTA VISTA CT 10 CROSS ST END R S 2 830 32 26,560 11/03/2021 40 04/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)AMADAV AMADOR AVE 10 CANYON DEL REY IMPERAL ST R S 2 478 33 15,774 11/11/2021 30 30-21 Failed (30-0)AMADAV AMADOR AVE 20 CONTRA COSTA ST FREMONT BLVD R S 2 1,553 33 51,249 11/11/2021 44 05/01/1988 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)AMADAV AMADOR AVE 30 FREMONT BLVD TERRACE ST R O 2 1,052 32 33,664 11/11/2021 46 01/19/1998 AC OVERLAY 50-41 Poor (50-31)AMADAV AMADOR AVE 40 TERRACE ST NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 1,487 32 47,584 08/25/2022 50 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)ANCOST ANCON ST 10 MESCAL ST BROADWAY AVE R A 2 1,110 33 36,630 11/06/2021 44 50-41 Poor (50-31)ANDRCT ANDREW CT 10 NAPA ST END R S 2 340 26 11,215 11/03/2021 63 05/01/1988 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)ASCOCT ASCOT CT 10 END ANCON ST R A 2 167 31 5,177 11/06/2021 30 30-21 Failed (30-0)ATHECT ATHENS CT 10 ANCON ST END R A 2 177 26 4,602 11/06/2021 49 50-41 Poor (50-31)AUTOPK AUTO CENTER PRKWY 10 CLEMENTINA AVE ROUNDABOUT @ ECHO AVE C A 2 1,225 26 31,850 11/10/2021 81 90-81 Good (90-71)AUTOPK AUTO CENTER PRKWY 20 ROUNDABOUT @ ECHO DEL MONTE BLVD C A 2 720 60 43,200 11/10/2021 80 05/14/1991 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)BAKEST BAKER ST 10 WINTON ST (AT ALLEY) BIRCH AVE R S 2 450 33 14,850 11/10/2021 50 50-41 Poor (50-31)BAKEST BAKER ST 20 BIRCH ST PHOENIX AVE (EAST) R A 2 354 32 11,328 11/10/2021 83 01/01/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 90-81 Good (90-71) 10/03/2022 Page 1 of 12
Packet Page 305
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition BAKEST BAKER ST 30 PHOENIX AVE (EAST) ECHO AVE R S 2 299 20 5,980 11/10/2021 42 50-41 Poor (50-31) BAKEST BAKER ST 40 ECHO AVE SAN PABLO AVE R A 2 360 20 7,200 11/10/2021 81 01/01/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 90-81 Good (90-71)BAKEST BAKER ST 50 SAN PABLO AVE LA SALLE AVE R S 2 700 20 14,000 11/10/2021 65 70-61 Fair (70-51)BALDCT BALDWIN CT 10 ORD GROVE AVE END R S 2 470 32 17,415 11/03/2021 39 04/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)BALFCT BALFOUR CT 10 BROADWAY AVE END R A 2 163 26 6,798 11/02/2021 41 50-41 Poor (50-31)BARBCT BARBARA CT 10 SIERRA AVE END R A 2 280 32 8,960 11/02/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)BAYCCR BAY CREST CIRCLE 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE (W) PENINSULA POINT DRIVE (E) R A 2 920 33 30,360 11/09/2021 88 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)BEACCT BEACH WOOD COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 430 33 14,190 11/09/2021 90 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)BEACDR BEACH WOOD DRIVE 10 BEACH WOOD COURT SUNSET VISTA DRIVE R A 2 583 33 19,239 11/09/2021 88 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)BIRCAV BIRCH AVE 10 FREMONT BLVD BAKER ST R O 2 1,041 31 32,271 11/04/2021 46 01/20/1998 AC OVERLAY 50-41 Poor (50-31)BOLECT BOLES CT 10 END WARING ST R S 2 202 28 5,656 11/04/2021 66 05/06/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 10 DEL MONTE BLVD HILLSDALE AV A O 4 650 61 39,650 11/10/2021 78 11/15/2018 3" HMA OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 15 HILLSDALE AV CALAVERAS ST A A 4 915 35 32,025 11/10/2021 95 11/15/2018 RECONSTRUCTION (FULL DEPTH 6" HMA) 100-91 Excellent (100-91)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 18 CALAVERAS ST FREMONT BLVD A A 4 530 52 27,560 11/10/2021 95 11/15/2018 RECONSTRUCTION (FULL DEPTH 6" HMA) 100-91 Excellent (100-91)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 20 FREMONT BLVD NOCHE BUENA ST A A 4 2,310 61 140,910 11/10/2021 74 10/02/2019 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 30 NOCHE BUENA ST SOTO ST A O 4 2,053 61 125,833 11/10/2021 96 11/30/2020 1/2" LC, 2" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 40 SOTO ST GENERAL JIM MOORE A O 4 2,275 58 131,950 11/10/2021 67 10/02/2019 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)BUCHST BUCHANAN ST 10 ORD GROVE AVE MILITARY AVE R A 2 756 32 24,192 11/03/2021 85 12/11/2008 AC OVERLAY & PATCH (1.5 IN) 90-81 Good (90-71)BUENST BUENA ST 10 KIMBALL AVE END R S 2 590 32 18,880 11/04/2021 26 05/01/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)CADICT CADIZ COURT 10 SHAFER STREET END R A 2 250 27 6,750 11/10/2021 50 05/01/1985 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)CALAST CALAVERAS ST 05 SONOMA AVE ELM AVE R S 2 515 32 16,480 11/04/2021 23 05/01/1985 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)CALAST CALAVERAS ST 15 ELM AVE BROADWAY AVE R S 2 525 31 16,275 11/04/2021 83 05/01/1985 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)CALAST CALAVERAS ST 30 BROADWAY AVE CLEMENTINA AVE C A 2 643 26 16,718 11/04/2021 80 80-71 Good (90-71)CARSST CARSON ST 10 WHEELER ST KIMBALL AVE R S 2 1,021 25 25,525 11/11/2021 53 04/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)CARSST CARSON ST 20 KIMBALL AVE END R S 2 381 33 13,333 11/11/2021 16 20-11 Failed (30-0)CHARAV CHARLES AVE 10 CANYON DEL REY FREMONT BLVD R S 2 452 32 14,464 11/04/2021 33 05/01/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)CIELCT CIELITO CT 10 END ROUSCH AVE R A 2 224 27 6,668 11/10/2021 49 05/08/2009 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)CIRCAV CIRCLE AVE 10 MILITARY AVE NOCHE BUENA ST R A 2 826 32 26,432 11/03/2021 97 11/30/2020 4" MILL AND FILL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)CIRCAV CIRCLE AVE 20 NOCHE BUENA ST GRAND VIEW ST R A 2 230 34 7,820 11/03/2021 97 11/30/2020 4" MILL AND FILL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)CIRCAV CIRCLE AVE 30 GRAND VIEW ST WARING ST R S 2 590 32 18,880 11/03/2021 39 40-31 Poor (50-31)CLEMAV CLEMENTINA AVE 10 DEL MONTE BLVD 1ST ROUNDABOUT C A 2 350 30 10,500 11/04/2021 90 08/29/2008 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 90-81 Good (90-71)CLEMAV CLEMENTINA AVE 15 1ST ROUNDABOUT FREMONT BLVD C A 2 525 35 18,375 11/04/2021 90 90-81 Good (90-71)CLEMAV CLEMENTINA AVE 20 FREMONT BLVD WINTON ST R O 2 1,086 32 34,752 11/04/2021 69 01/21/1998 AC OVERLAY 70-61 Fair (70-51)COEAVE COE AVENUE 10 MONTEREY RD PACIFIC CREST DRIVE C A 2 2,779 43 119,497 11/09/2021 75 80-71 Good (90-71)COEAVE COE AVENUE 15 PACIFIC CREST DRIVE BUTTERCUP BLVD C A 2 1,075 43 46,225 11/09/2021 90 90-81 Good (90-71)COEAVE COE AVENUE 20 BUTTERCUP BLVD 400' W/O ENTRY TO SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL C A 2 2,175 31 67,425 11/09/2021 90 90-81 Good (90-71)COEAVE COE AVENUE 30 400' W/O ENTRY TO SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY TO SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL C A 2 400 43 17,200 11/09/2021 75 80-71 Good (90-71)COEAVE COE AVENUE 40 ENTRY TO SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD C A 2 245 67 16,415 11/09/2021 75 80-71 Good (90-71)COLOST COLONEL DURHAM STREET 10 MALMEDY RD 66' W/O 7TH AV R A 2 3,745 21 78,645 11/09/2021 35 40-31 Poor (50-31)CONTST CONTRA COSTA ST 10 HAMILTON AVE SONOMA AVE R S 2 214 33 7,062 11/04/2021 56 05/01/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)CONTST CONTRA COSTA ST 20 SONOMA AVE BROADWAY AVE R S 2 1,060 31 32,860 11/04/2021 59 05/05/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)COSTST COSTA ST 10 ANCON ST BROADWAY AVE R A 2 597 33 19,701 11/06/2021 41 50-41 Poor (50-31)CROSST CROSS ST 10 ORD GROVE AVE MILITARY AVE R S 2 786 30 23,580 11/03/2021 48 50-41 Poor (50-31)CYPRCT CYPRESS RIDGE COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 400 33 13,200 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)DARWPL DARWIN PL 10 DARWIN ST HARDING ST R A 1 157 23 3,611 11/11/2021 25 30-21 Failed (30-0) 10/03/2022 Page 2 of 12
Packet Page 306
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition DARWST DARWIN ST 10 HILBY AVE END R A 2 450 21 9,450 11/06/2021 35 40-31 Poor (50-31) DARWST DARWIN ST 20 WANDA AVE END R A 2 266 25 6,650 11/08/2021 39 40-31 Poor (50-31)DARWST DARWIN ST 30 ST JAMES ST ST ALBANS ST R A 1 750 24 18,000 11/08/2021 45 50-41 Poor (50-31)DARWST DARWIN ST 40 ELM AVE BROADWAY AVE R A 1 506 24 12,144 11/11/2021 54 60-51 Fair (70-51)DARWST DARWIN ST 50 BROADWAY AVE END R A 1 674 23 15,502 11/11/2021 35 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)DARWST DARWIN ST 60 MINGO AVE END R A 2 226 22 4,972 11/11/2021 37 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)DARWST DARWIN ST 70 MINGO AVE H PLACE R A 2 424 22 9,328 11/11/2021 51 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)DARWST DARWIN ST 80 VALLEJO PL LA SALLE AVE R A 1 1,250 22 27,500 11/11/2021 42 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 10NB CITY LIMIT CANYON DEL REY BLVD A A 2 1,145 37 42,365 11/06/2021 58 06/04/2010 RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) 60-51 Fair (70-51)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 10SB CANYON DEL REY BLVD CITY LIMIT A A 2 1,145 27 30,915 11/06/2021 78 11/13/2009 RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) 80-71 Good (90-71)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 20 CANYON DEL REY BLVD BROADWAY AV A O 4 1,115 60 66,900 11/06/2021 61 10/31/2018 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 30 BROADWAY AV 157' N/O CLEMINTINA AV A A 4 1,586 61 96,746 11/06/2021 55 09/01/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 40 157' N/O CLEMENTINA AV CHANGE OF PAVEMENT A A 4 1,100 61 67,100 11/06/2021 90 08/01/2016 RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) 90-81 Good (90-71)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 50 CHANGE OF PAVEMENT AUTO CENTER PKWY A A 4 1,000 62 62,000 11/06/2021 95 09/01/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 60 AUTO CENTER PKWY FREMONT BLVD A A 2 2,450 60 147,000 11/06/2021 95 05/07/2007 SLURRY SEAL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)DOUGCT DOUGLAS CT 10 KIMBALL AVE END R S 2 350 26 9,100 11/04/2021 50 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)EASTRD EAST FRONTAGE RD 10 LA SALLE AVE MILITARY AVE R A 2 1,699 43 73,057 11/12/2021 49 04/08/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)ECHOAV ECHO AVE 10 AUTO CENTER PKWY FREMONT BLVD C O 2 195 40 7,800 11/10/2021 87 08/01/2014 3" HMA OVERLAY 90-81 Good (90-71)ECHOAV ECHO AVE 20 FREMONT BLVD BAKER ST R A 4 1,010 86 86,860 11/10/2021 95 11/30/2020 RECON STRUCTURE w/ 3" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)ELMAVE ELM AVE 10 DEL MONTE BLVD HILLSDALE ST R S 2 1,282 32 41,024 11/11/2021 37 10/15/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)ELMAVE ELM AVE 15 HILLSDALE ST CALAVERAS ST R S 2 928 32 29,696 11/11/2021 44 10/15/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)ELMAVE ELM AVE 25 CALAVERAS ST FREMONT BLVD R S 2 300 32 9,600 11/11/2021 79 10/15/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)ELMAVE ELM AVE 30 FREMONT BLVD TERRACE ST R S 2 966 32 30,912 11/11/2021 35 40-31 Poor (50-31)ELMAVE ELM AVE 40 TERRACE ST NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 1,489 32 47,648 08/25/2022 45 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)ELMAVE ELM AVE 50 NOCHE BUENA ST JUDSON ST R A 2 707 32 22,624 11/11/2021 79 01/10/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 80-71 Good (90-71)ELMAVE ELM AVE 58 JUDSON ST WARING ST R A 2 174 32 5,568 11/11/2021 85 04/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)ELMAVE ELM AVE 60 HARDING ST DARWIN ST R A 1 175 22 3,850 11/11/2021 48 04/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)ELMAVE ELM AVE 70 VALLEJO ST DARWIN ST R A 1 213 22 4,686 11/11/2021 52 60-51 Fair (70-51)EUCAAV EUCALYPTAS AVE 10 BALDWIN CT LASSEN ST R A 2 552 32 17,664 11/03/2021 38 05/01/1988 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)FARGCT FARGO COURT 10 END HILBY AVE R A 2 317 33 10,461 11/06/2021 28 30-21 Failed (30-0)FERNST FERNANDO ST 10 MINGO AVE SAN PABLO AVE R A 2 1,009 21 21,189 11/03/2021 44 50-41 Poor (50-31)FLORPL FLORES PL 10 WARING ST FLORES ST R A 1 169 23 3,887 11/04/2021 53 60-51 Fair (70-51)FLORST FLORES ST 10 HILBY AVE END R A 2 132 24 3,168 11/06/2021 64 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)FLORST FLORES ST 20 END (N) END (S) R A 2 1,065 24 27,863 11/08/2021 59 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)FLORST FLORES ST 30 END BROADWAY AVE R A 2 537 33 17,721 11/10/2021 55 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)FLORST FLORES ST 40 BROADWAY AVE MINGO AVE R A 2 1,060 36 38,160 11/10/2021 42 50-41 Poor (50-31)FLORST FLORES ST 50 MINGO AVE LA SALLE AVE R A 2 1,755 36 63,180 11/10/2021 35 40-31 Poor (50-31)FRANAV FRANCIS AVE 10 CANYON DEL REY FREMONT BLVD R S 2 1,042 30 31,260 11/04/2021 25 08/01/1988 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 05 CITY LIMIT (S) KIMBALL AV A C 2 720 34 24,480 09/01/2022 63 09/01/2022 MICROSURFACING 70-61 Fair (70-51)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 10 KIMBALL AV HILBY AV A C 2 1,118 34 38,012 11/05/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 20 HILBY AV SONOMA AV A C 4 1,421 34 48,314 11/05/2021 83 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 30 SONOMA AV BROADWAY AV A C 2 1,165 34 39,610 11/05/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 40 BROADWAY AV BIRCH AV A A 2 1,244 34 42,296 11/05/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 50 BIRCH AV SAN PABLO AV A A 2 1,032 24 24,768 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 60 SAN PABLO AV PLAYA AV A A 2 1,190 24 28,560 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71) 10/03/2022 Page 3 of 12
Packet Page 307
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 70 PLAYA AV 255 N/O MILITARY AV (COP) A A 2 1,585 25 39,625 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71) FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 80 255' N/O MILITARY AV (COP) CITY LIMIT (N) A A 2 635 26 16,510 09/01/2022 68 09/01/2022 MICROSURFACING 70-61 Fair (70-51)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 05 KIMBALL AV CITY LIMIT (S) A C 2 720 34 24,480 09/01/2022 62 09/01/2022 MICROSURFACING 70-61 Fair (70-51)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 10 HILBY AV KIMBALL AV A C 2 1,118 34 38,012 11/05/2021 83 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 20 SONOMA AV HILBY AV A C 2 1,421 34 48,314 11/05/2021 84 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 30 BROADWAY AV SONOMA AV A C 2 1,165 34 39,610 11/05/2021 84 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 40 BIRCH AV BROADWAY AV A A 2 1,244 34 42,296 11/05/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 50 SAN PABLO AV BIRCH AV A A 2 1,032 24 24,768 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 60 PLAYA AV SAN PABLO AV A A 2 1,190 24 28,560 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 70 255 N/O MILITARY AV (COP) PLAYA AV A A 2 1,585 25 39,625 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 80 CITY LIMIT (N) 255' N/O MILITARY AV (COP) A A 2 635 26 16,510 09/01/2022 60 09/01/2022 MICROSURFACING 60-51 Fair (70-51)GENJIMNB GENERAL JIM MOORE (NB) 10 END OF MEDIAN HILBY AV A A 2 2,526 32 80,832 11/05/2021 80 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMNB GENERAL JIM MOORE (NB) 20 HILBY AV BRAODWAY AV A A 2 2,575 32 82,400 11/05/2021 83 90-81 Good (90-71)GENJIMNB GENERAL JIM MOORE (NB) 30 BRAODWAY AVE EUCALYPTUS RD A A 2 5,100 32 163,200 11/05/2021 81 90-81 Good (90-71)GENJIMNB GENERAL JIM MOORE (NB) 40 EUCALYPTUS RD COE AV A A 2 653 33 21,549 11/05/2021 79 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMNB GENERAL JIM MOORE (NB) 50 COE AVE ARLONCOURT RD A A 2 2,435 33 80,355 11/05/2021 79 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 10 ARLONCOURT RD COE AV A A 2 2,435 33 80,355 11/05/2021 79 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 20 COE AV EUCALYPTUS RD A A 2 653 33 21,549 11/05/2021 81 90-81 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 30 EUCALYPTUS RD BROADWAY AVE A A 2 5,100 64 326,400 11/05/2021 82 90-81 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 40 BROADWAY AV HILBY AV A A 2 2,575 32 82,400 11/05/2021 78 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 50 HILBY AV END OF MEDIAN A A 2 2,526 32 80,832 11/05/2021 79 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 60 END OF MEDIAN SOUTH CITY LIMITS A A 2 450 93 41,850 11/05/2021 85 90-81 Good (90-71)GIGLRD GIGLING RD 10 286' E/O PARKER FLATS CUT OFF RD 70' E/O 7TH AV A A 2 2,179 26 56,654 11/09/2021 18 20-11 Failed (30-0)GIGLRD GIGLING RD 20 1ST AV 480' FROM END @ CHANGE OF PAVEMENT C A 2 1,058 31 32,798 11/09/2021 63 70-61 Fair (70-51)GIGLRD GIGLING RD 30 480' FROM END @ CHANGE OF PAVEMENT END C A 2 480 31 14,880 11/09/2021 33 40-31 Poor (50-31)GOODST GOODWIN ST 10 BAKER ST OLYMPIA AVE R A 1 1,410 17 23,970 11/10/2021 77 01/10/1998 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 80-71 Good (90-71)GRANST GRANADA ST 10 MESCAL ST MINGO AVE R A 2 539 27 14,553 11/03/2021 63 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)GRANST GRANADA ST 20 MINGO AVE SAN PABLO AVE R A 2 1,012 22 22,264 11/03/2021 62 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)GRNDST GRAND VIEW ST 10 LUXTON ST ORD GROVE AVE R S 2 840 32 26,880 11/03/2021 37 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)GRNDST GRAND VIEW ST 20 ORD GROVE AVE CIRCLE R S 2 445 33 14,685 11/03/2021 21 30-21 Failed (30-0)GREECT GREEN CT 10 NOCHE BUENA ST END R A 2 157 22 3,915 11/10/2021 43 05/07/2009 CRACK SEAL/ CAPE SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)HPLACE H PLACE 10 DARWIN ST HARDING ST R A 2 168 21 3,528 11/11/2021 34 40-31 Poor (50-31)HACIST HACIENDA ST 10 ORD GROVE AVE MILITARY AVE R S 2 764 32 24,448 11/03/2021 71 80-71 Good (90-71)HAMIAV HAMILTON AVE 10 TRINITY AVE HILLSDALE ST R S 2 1,034 36 37,224 11/02/2021 35 05/06/1991 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)HAMIAV HAMILTON AVE 20 HILLSDALE ST FREMONT BLVD R S 2 915 36 32,940 11/02/2021 44 05/06/1991 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)HAMIAV HAMILTON AVE 30 FREMONT BLVD TERRACE ST R S 2 1,265 32 40,480 08/25/2022 62 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 70-61 Fair (70-51)HAMIAV HAMILTON AVE 40 TERRACE ST NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 1,446 32 46,272 11/02/2021 41 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)HARCAV HARCOURT AV 10 CANYON DEL REY BLVD FREMONT BLVD C S 2 1,815 42 76,230 11/02/2021 59 60-51 Fair (70-51)HARCAV HARCOURT AV 20 FREMONT BLVD SIDDAL ST R S 2 970 37 35,890 08/25/2022 44 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)HARCAV HARCOURT AV 30 PROSPECT ST 300' @ WIDTH CHANGE R S 2 300 32 9,600 08/25/2022 49 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)HARCAV HARCOURT AV 35 300' @ WIDTH CHANGE SIDDAL ST R S 2 138 18 2,484 08/25/2022 63 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 70-61 Fair (70-51)HARCAV HARCOURT AV 40 NOCHE BUENA ST PROSPECT ST R S 2 1,450 33 47,850 11/02/2021 51 04/08/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)HARDPL HARDING PL 10 HARDING ST FLORES ST R A 1 188 22 4,136 11/11/2021 43 50-41 Poor (50-31)HARDST HARDING ST 10 ST ALBINS HILBY AVE R A 1 1,715 25 42,875 11/08/2021 55 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)HARDST HARDING ST 20 BROADWAY AVE ELM AVE R A 1 503 22 11,066 11/11/2021 41 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31) 10/03/2022 Page 4 of 12
Packet Page 308
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition HARDST HARDING ST 30 MINGO AVE BROADWAY AVE R A 1 1,050 22 23,100 11/11/2021 37 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31) HARDST HARDING ST 40 H PLACE MINGO AVE R A 2 475 22 10,450 11/11/2021 50 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)HARDST HARDING ST 50 LA SALLE AVE HARDING PL R A 1 1,110 22 24,420 11/11/2021 42 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)HARRCT HARROW CT 10 HILBY AVE END R A 2 236 27 7,935 11/06/2021 38 40-31 Poor (50-31)HARTST HART ST 10 KIMBALL AVE END NCR A 2 200 30 6,000 11/11/2021 97 05/01/1982 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)HAVAST HAVANA ST 10 LA SALLE AVE GRANADA ST R A 1 1,719 22 37,818 11/03/2021 59 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)HAVITE HAVILAND TERRACE 10 KIMBALL AVE (W) KIMBALL AVE (E) R A 2 855 32 27,360 11/04/2021 60 60-51 Fair (70-51)HEATCT HEATHER CT 10 HILBY AVE END R A 2 261 26 8,265 11/06/2021 35 40-31 Poor (50-31)HIGHPL HIGHLAND PL 10 END HIGHLAND ST R S 2 276 23 7,002 11/10/2021 25 30-21 Failed (30-0)HIGHST HIGHLAND ST 10 PLUMAS AV KIMBALL AV C S 2 883 36 31,788 11/10/2021 31 40-31 Poor (50-31)HIGHST HIGHLAND ST 20 BROADWAY AVE MINGO AVE R S 2 1,014 32 32,448 11/02/2021 50 11/15/2010 SEAL CRACKS 50-41 Poor (50-31)HIGHST HIGHLAND ST 30 MENDOCINO ST LA SALLE AVE R S 2 1,642 33 54,186 11/02/2021 39 11/15/2010 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)HIGHST HIGHLAND ST 40 LA SALLE AVE ORD GROVE AVE R A 2 900 33 29,700 11/02/2021 76 12/10/2008 AC OVERLAY & PATCH (1.5 IN) 80-71 Good (90-71)HIGHST HIGHLAND ST 50 ORD GROVE AVE MILITARY AVE R A 2 770 33 25,410 11/02/2021 83 90-81 Good (90-71)HILBAV HILBY AV 10 CANYON DEL REY FREMONT BLVD C A 2 1,385 36 49,860 11/02/2021 64 10/22/2018 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)HILBAV HILBY AV 20 FREMONT BLVD SHAFER ST C A 2 1,655 36 59,580 11/02/2021 95 100-91 Excellent (100-91)HILBAV HILBY AV 30 SHAFER ST NOCHE BUENA ST C A 2 1,463 36 52,668 11/02/2021 95 05/05/1984 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)HILBAV HILBY AV 40 NOCHE BUENA ST WARING ST C A 2 864 36 31,104 11/02/2021 95 05/05/1986 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)HILBAV HILBY AV 50 WARING ST YOSEMITE ST C A 2 1,292 36 46,512 11/02/2021 95 100-91 Excellent (100-91)HILBAV HILBY AV 60 YOSEMITE ST MESCAL ST C A 2 994 36 35,784 11/02/2021 79 10/03/2019 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)HILBAV HILBY AV 70 MESCAL ST GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD C A 3 250 48 12,000 11/02/2021 83 10/02/2019 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)HILLST HILLSDALE ST 10 HARCOURT AV TRINITY AV C S 2 305 32 9,760 11/04/2021 40 40-31 Poor (50-31)HILLST HILLSDALE ST 20 TRINITY AV SONOMA AV C S 2 600 33 19,800 11/04/2021 37 40-31 Poor (50-31)HILLST HILLSDALE ST 30 SONOMA AV BROADWAY AV C S 2 1,023 34 34,782 11/04/2021 29 30-21 Failed (30-0)HILLST HILLSDALE ST 40 BROADWAY AVE OLYMPIA AVE C S 2 255 32 8,160 11/04/2021 14 20-11 Failed (30-0)HILTST HILTON ST 10 OLYMPIA AVE BAKER ST R O 1 1,890 17 32,130 11/10/2021 74 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)IMPEST IMPERAL ST 10 SONOMA AVE PALM AVE R S 2 729 35 25,515 11/04/2021 39 04/08/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)ISABCT ISABELLE CT 10 KIMBALL AVE END R S 2 412 28 11,536 11/04/2021 25 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)JPLACE J PLACE 10 LUXTON ST JUDSON ST R A 1 174 22 3,828 11/11/2021 47 50-41 Poor (50-31)JUARPL JUAREZ PL 10 HAVANA ST JUAREZ ST R A 2 167 32 5,344 11/03/2021 48 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)JUARST JUAREZ ST 10 JUAREZ PL LA SALLE AVE R A 2 1,274 22 28,028 11/03/2021 40 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)JUDSST JUDSON ST 10 N. END BROADWAY AVE R A 2 325 22 8,381 11/04/2021 45 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)JUDSST JUDSON ST 20 BROADWAY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,050 17 17,850 11/04/2021 74 04/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)JUDSST JUDSON ST 30 SONOMA AVE HILBY AVE R S 1 1,325 17 22,525 11/04/2021 54 05/12/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)JUDSST JUDSON ST 40 MINGO AVE LUXTON PL R A 1 625 22 13,750 11/10/2021 54 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)JUDSST JUDSON ST 50 W PLACE MINGO AVE R A 1 675 22 14,850 11/10/2021 57 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)JUDSST JUDSON ST 60 LA SALLE AVE END R A 1 920 22 20,240 11/11/2021 52 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)KENNPL KENNETH PL 10 LOWELL ST KENNETH ST R A 1 153 22 3,366 11/10/2021 42 50-41 Poor (50-31)KENNST KENNETH ST 10 HILBY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,310 17 22,270 11/04/2021 56 01/20/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 60-51 Fair (70-51)KENNST KENNETH ST 20 SONOMA AVE BROADWAY AVE R S 1 1,050 17 17,850 11/04/2021 49 05/06/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)KENNST KENNETH ST 30 BROADWAY AVE END R A 2 345 22 7,590 11/04/2021 39 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)KENNST KENNETH ST 40 KENNETH PL MINGO AVE R A 1 605 22 13,310 11/10/2021 43 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)KENNST KENNETH ST 50 MINGO AVE END R A 2 304 22 9,063 11/10/2021 41 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)KENNST KENNETH ST 60 SAN PABLO AVE END R A 1 594 22 15,443 11/10/2021 42 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)KIMBAV KIMBALL AV 10 FREMONT BLVD WHEELER ST C A 2 1,291 36 46,476 09/01/2022 100 09/01/2022 FOAMED FDR, 4" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91) 10/03/2022 Page 5 of 12
Packet Page 309
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition KIMBAV KIMBALL AV 20 WHEELER ST SHAFER ST C A 2 790 36 28,440 11/11/2021 54 60-51 Fair (70-51) KIMBAV KIMBALL AV 30 SHAFER ST NOCHE BUENA ST C A 2 1,443 36 51,948 11/11/2021 26 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)KIMBAV KIMBALL AV 40 NOCHE BUENA ST BUENA ST C A 2 1,189 36 42,804 11/11/2021 45 05/14/1991 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)KIMBAV KIMBALL AV 50 BUENA ST MESCAL ST C A 2 1,540 36 55,440 11/11/2021 29 05/07/2007 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)LPLACE L PLACE 10 LUXTON ST LOWELL ST R A 1 177 22 3,894 11/11/2021 55 60-51 Fair (70-51)LAHOCT LA HONDA CT 10 HIGHLAND ST END R A 2 469 32 17,475 11/10/2021 40 40-31 Poor (50-31)LAJOAV LA JOLLA AVE 10 ORD GROVE AVE NOCHE BUENA ST R A 2 580 34 19,720 11/03/2021 35 01/25/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 40-31 Poor (50-31)LASALA LA SALLE AV 05 DEL MONTE BLVD FREMONT BLVD C A 4 443 60 26,580 11/03/2021 95 11/30/2020 FULL DEPTH R&R 6" HMA 100-91 Excellent (100-91)LASALA LA SALLE AV 10 FREMONT BLVD NOCHE BUENA ST C A 2 1,200 42 50,400 11/03/2021 70 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 70-61 Fair (70-51)LASALA LA SALLE AV 20 NOCHE BUENA ST WARING ST C A 2 916 36 32,976 11/03/2021 75 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 80-71 Good (90-71)LASALA LA SALLE AV 30 WARING ST LUZERN ST C A 2 1,044 36 37,584 11/03/2021 81 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)LASALA LA SALLE AV 40 LUZERN ST YOSEMITE ST C A 2 910 36 32,760 11/03/2021 78 10/22/2018 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)LASALA LA SALLE AV 50 YOSEMITE ST LINCOLN ST (W) C O 2 930 36 33,480 11/03/2021 82 10/22/2018 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)LASALA LA SALLE AV 60 LINCOLN ST (W) SANDPIPER CT C A 2 1,263 36 45,468 11/03/2021 35 01/25/1993 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 40-31 Poor (50-31)LAGUST LAGUNA ST 10 LA SALLE AVE PHOENIX AVE R O 1 1,270 17 21,590 11/10/2021 72 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)LAGUST LAGUNA ST 20 PHOENIX AVE OLYMPIA AVE R O 1 1,140 17 19,380 11/10/2021 76 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)LASSST LASSEN ST 10 ORD GROVE AVE MILITARY AVE R S 2 771 32 24,672 11/03/2021 43 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)LAURLN LAURA LN 10 NOCHE BUENA GRANDVIEW ST O A 1 225 8 1,800 02/24/2018 54 60-51 Fair (70-51)LIGHDR LIGHTFIGHTER DRIVE 20 GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD END OF MEDIAN C A 2 375 49 18,375 11/10/2021 68 70-61 Fair (70-51)LIGHTDREB LIGHTFIGHTER DRIVE (EB) 10 HWY 1 GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD A A 2 2,547 49 124,803 11/10/2021 76 80-71 Good (90-71)LIGHTDRWB LIGHTFIGHTER DRIVE (WB) 10 GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD HWY 1 A A 2 2,547 49 124,803 11/10/2021 63 70-61 Fair (70-51)LINCST LINCOLN ST 10 SAN PABLO AVE LA SALLE AVE R A 1 700 22 15,400 11/03/2021 34 40-31 Poor (50-31)LINCST LINCOLN ST 20 LA SALLE AVE ORD GROVE AVE R S 2 868 32 27,776 11/03/2021 64 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)LINDCT LINDBERGH CT 10 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 189 27 5,103 11/03/2021 49 50-41 Poor (50-31)LISBCT LISBON CT 10 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 243 26 9,636 11/03/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)LOPEAV LOPEZ AVE 10 SUTTER STREET CHANGE OF PAVEMENT R S 2 245 36 8,820 11/04/2021 85 10/01/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)LOPEAV LOPEZ AVE 20 CHANGE OF PAVEMENT FREMONT BLVD R S 2 650 28 18,200 11/04/2021 30 30-21 Failed (30-0)LORECT LORENZO CT 10 END KIMBALL AVE R S 2 743 27 20,601 11/11/2021 25 10/01/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)LOUVCT LOUVAINE CT 10 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 239 26 9,635 11/03/2021 40 40-31 Poor (50-31)LOWEPL LOWELL PL 10 KENNETH ST LOWELL ST R A 1 149 22 3,278 11/10/2021 48 50-41 Poor (50-31)LOWEST LOWELL ST 10 PARK PL BROADWAY AVE R A 1 358 22 7,876 11/04/2021 33 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)LOWEST LOWELL ST 20 BROADWAY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,065 17 18,105 11/04/2021 75 01/22/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 80-71 Good (90-71)LOWEST LOWELL ST 30 SONOMA AVE HILBY AVE R S 1 1,330 17 22,610 11/04/2021 64 05/06/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)LOWEST LOWELL ST 40 MINGO AVE KENNETH PL R A 1 584 22 12,848 11/10/2021 52 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)LOWEST LOWELL ST 50 LOWELL PL MINGO AVE R A 1 580 22 12,760 11/10/2021 53 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)LOWEST LOWELL ST 60 SAN PABLO AVE L PLACE R A 1 266 22 5,852 11/11/2021 56 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)LOWEST LOWELL ST 70 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 326 22 9,547 11/11/2021 54 60-51 Fair (70-51)LUXTPL LUXTON PL 10 JUDSON ST LUXTON ST R A 2 159 22 3,498 11/10/2021 44 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)LUXTST LUXTON ST 10 HILBY AVE END R S 2 438 26 11,388 11/04/2021 66 05/01/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)LUXTST LUXTON ST 20 HILBY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,320 17 22,440 11/04/2021 73 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)LUXTST LUXTON ST 30 SONOMA AVE BROADWAY AVE R A 1 1,060 17 18,020 11/04/2021 71 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)LUXTST LUXTON ST 40 BROADWAY AVE PARK PLACE R A 1 341 22 7,502 11/04/2021 44 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)LUXTST LUXTON ST 50 LUXTON PL MINGO AVE R A 1 595 22 13,090 11/10/2021 40 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)LUXTST LUXTON ST 60 MINGO AVE J PLACE R A 2 550 22 12,100 11/10/2021 41 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)LUXTST LUXTON ST 70 L PLACE SAN PABLO AVE R A 1 365 22 8,030 11/11/2021 48 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31) 10/03/2022 Page 6 of 12
Packet Page 310
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition LUXTST LUXTON ST 80 SAN PABLO AVE LA SALLE AVE R A 1 720 22 15,840 11/11/2021 54 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51) LUXTST LUXTON ST 90 LA SALLE AVE ORD GROVE AVE R S 2 909 32 29,088 11/03/2021 43 05/06/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)LUZEPL LUZERN PL 10 LUZERN ST VALLEJO ST R A 1 171 22 3,762 11/11/2021 39 40-31 Poor (50-31)LUZEST LUZERN ST 10 HILBY AVE CHANGE OF PAVEMENT R A 2 220 24 5,280 11/05/2021 95 100-91 Excellent (100-91)LUZEST LUZERN ST 15 CHANGE OF PAVEMENT END R A 2 236 24 5,664 11/05/2021 33 40-31 Poor (50-31)LUZEST LUZERN ST 20 WANDA AVE ST ELMO ST R A 1 1,040 24 24,960 11/08/2021 34 40-31 Poor (50-31)LUZEST LUZERN ST 30 BROADWAY AVE S. END R A 2 413 24 11,031 11/03/2021 30 30-21 Failed (30-0)LUZEST LUZERN ST 40 BROADWAY AVE MINGO AVE R A 1 1,015 22 22,330 11/03/2021 39 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)LUZEST LUZERN ST 50 MINGO AVE LA SALLE AVE R A 1 1,691 22 37,202 11/03/2021 37 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)LUZEST LUZERN ST 60 LA SALLE AVE MIRA MONTE AVE R S 2 615 30 18,450 11/03/2021 61 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)LUZEST LUZERN ST 70 MIRA MONTE AVE ORD GROVE AVE R S 2 245 32 7,840 11/03/2021 56 60-51 Fair (70-51)LYSECT LYSETTE CT 10 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 236 26 9,557 11/03/2021 53 60-51 Fair (70-51)MADECT MADERA CT 10 END KIMBALL AVE R S 2 450 26 11,700 11/04/2021 22 05/14/1991 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)MADRCT MADRID CT 10 KIMBALL AVE END R A 2 400 33 13,200 11/04/2021 57 60-51 Fair (70-51)MAIDCT MAIDEN CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 134 26 5,189 11/06/2021 48 50-41 Poor (50-31)MALMRD MALMEDY ROAD 10 GIGLING RD COLONEL DURHAM ST R A 2 890 21 18,690 11/09/2021 43 50-41 Poor (50-31)MALTCT MALTA CT 10 END TWEED ST R A 2 434 32 14,498 11/10/2021 59 60-51 Fair (70-51)MANSCT MANSELL CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 180 30 5,400 11/06/2021 43 50-41 Poor (50-31)MARECT MARIETTA CT 10 END MARIETTA ST R A 2 147 36 5,292 11/02/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)MAREST MARIETTA ST 10 MESCAL ST (N) MESCAL ST (S) R A 2 647 36 24,864 11/02/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)MARIST MARIN ST 10 CANYON DEL REY HILBY AVE R S 2 478 30 14,340 11/04/2021 29 05/14/1991 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)MARPST MARIPOSA ST 10 LA SALLE AVE MILITARY AVE R A 2 1,624 32 51,968 11/03/2021 84 12/11/2008 AC OVERLAY & PATCH (1.5 IN) 90-81 Good (90-71)MAURCT MAURITINA CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 107 26 4,334 11/02/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)MENDCT MENDOCINO CT 10 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 219 22 6,627 11/03/2021 66 70-61 Fair (70-51)MENDPL MENDOCINO PL 10 MENDOCINO ST ST HELENA ST R A 1 150 22 3,300 11/03/2021 44 50-41 Poor (50-31)MENDST MENDOCINO ST 10 YOSEMITE ST MINGO AVE R A 1 670 32 21,440 11/03/2021 37 04/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)MENDST MENDOCINO ST 20 MINGO AVE MENDOCINO PL R A 1 1,410 22 31,020 11/03/2021 53 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)MENDST MENDOCINO ST 30 LA SALLE AVE MILITARY AVE R A 2 1,632 32 52,224 11/03/2021 79 12/10/2008 AC OVERLAY & PATCH (1.5 IN) 80-71 Good (90-71)MERCCT MERCEDES CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 134 26 6,905 11/02/2021 39 40-31 Poor (50-31)MESCCT MESCAL CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 164 37 6,981 11/10/2021 55 60-51 Fair (70-51)MESCPL MESCAL PL 10 MESCAL ST END R A 2 172 20 3,440 11/06/2021 62 70-61 Fair (70-51)MESCST MESCAL ST 10 PLUMAS AV 210''N-MESCAL ST R S 2 210 21 4,410 11/06/2021 49 11/27/2009 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)MESCST MESCAL ST 12 210'N-MESCAL ST HILBY AV C S 2 1,893 22 41,646 11/06/2021 31 40-31 Poor (50-31)MESCST MESCAL ST 20 HILBY AV SONOMA AV C A 2 1,279 36 46,044 11/06/2021 40 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)MESCST MESCAL ST 30 SONOMA AV BROADWAY AV C A 2 1,496 36 53,856 11/06/2021 40 05/06/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)MESCST MESCAL ST 40 BROADWAY AV MERCEDES CT C A 2 1,350 36 48,600 11/06/2021 42 05/07/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)MESCST MESCAL ST 50 MERCEDES CT SAN PABLO AVE C A 2 870 36 31,320 11/06/2021 44 05/07/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)METZAV METZ AVE 10 GRAND VIEW ST WARING ST R S 2 646 32 20,672 08/25/2022 44 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)MIGUCT MIGUEL CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 206 34 7,004 11/02/2021 39 40-31 Poor (50-31)MILIAV MILITARY AV 10 FREMONT BLVD CIRCLE AV C A 2 445 37 16,465 11/09/2021 95 11/30/2020 1/2" LC, 1-3/4" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)MILIAV MILITARY AV 20 CIRCLE AV NOCHE BUENA ST C A 2 335 37 12,395 11/09/2021 85 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)MILIAV MILITARY AV 30 NOCHE BUENA ST CROSS ST C S 2 1,100 37 40,700 11/09/2021 72 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 80-71 Good (90-71)MILIAV MILITARY AV 40 CROSS ST HIGHLAND ST C S 2 1,331 37 49,247 11/09/2021 56 60-51 Fair (70-51)MILIAV MILITARY AV 50 HIGHLAND ST BUCHANAN ST C S 2 1,045 37 38,665 11/09/2021 52 60-51 Fair (70-51)MILIAV MILITARY AV 60 BUCHANAN ST PARALTA AV (W) C S 2 1,340 37 49,580 11/09/2021 55 60-51 Fair (70-51) 10/03/2022 Page 7 of 12
Packet Page 311
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition MILIAV MILITARY AV 70 PARALTA AV (W) PARALTA AV (E) R S 2 999 37 36,963 11/09/2021 35 40-31 Poor (50-31) MINGAV MINGO AV 10 NOCHE BUENA ST FLORES ST C A 2 1,054 36 37,944 11/04/2021 26 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)MINGAV MINGO AV 16 FLORES ST SOTO ST C A 2 975 36 35,100 11/04/2021 25 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)MINGAV MINGO AV 18 SOTO ST MENDOCINO ST C A 2 370 36 13,320 11/04/2021 36 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)MINGAV MINGO AV 20 MENDOCINO ST YOSEMITE ST C A 2 370 36 13,320 11/04/2021 42 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)MINGAV MINGO AV 30 MESCAL ST GRANADA ST C A 2 517 37 19,129 11/03/2021 53 60-51 Fair (70-51)MIRMAV MIRA MAR AVE 10 CROSS ST HIGHLAND ST R A 2 1,112 28 31,136 11/03/2021 97 11/30/2020 4" MILL AND FILL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)MIRAAV MIRA MONTE AVE 10 WARING ST LUZERN ST R S 2 1,128 32 36,096 11/03/2021 47 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)MIZPCT MIZPAH CT 10 MESCAL ST END R A 2 156 26 7,374 11/02/2021 42 50-41 Poor (50-31)MODOST MODOC ST 10 KIMBALL AVE ROUSCH AVE R S 2 483 32 15,456 11/10/2021 52 05/08/2009 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)MONOCT MONO CT 10 ROUSCH AVE END R A 2 174 27 5,318 11/10/2021 62 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)MONSCT MONSERAT CT 10 MINGO AVE (W) MINGO AVE (E) R A 2 163 33 5,379 11/03/2021 51 60-51 Fair (70-51)MONTRD MONTEREY RD 10 FREMONT BLVD CHANGE OF PAVEMENT C O 2 2,110 33 69,630 11/05/2021 84 90-81 Good (90-71)MONTRD MONTEREY RD 15 CHANGE OF PAVEMENT COE AVE C O 2 810 33 26,730 11/05/2021 76 80-71 Good (90-71)MONTRD MONTEREY RD 20 COE AV 190' S/O BUNA LOOP (COP) R A 2 720 34 24,480 11/06/2021 80 80-71 Good (90-71)MONTRD MONTEREY RD 30 190' S/O BUNA LOOP 340' N/O NORMANDY RD A A 2 6,350 30 190,500 11/06/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)NADIST NADINA ST 10 LA SALLE AVE SAN PABLO AVE R A 2 704 21 14,784 11/03/2021 59 60-51 Fair (70-51)NAPAST NAPA ST 10 MINGO AVE SAN PABLO AVE R S 1 1,016 21 21,336 11/03/2021 33 40-31 Poor (50-31)NAPAST NAPA ST 20 END LA SALLE AVE R S 2 160 20 3,200 11/03/2021 49 50-41 Poor (50-31)NAPAST NAPA ST 30 LA SALLE AVE ABRAHAM CT R S 2 615 32 19,680 11/03/2021 45 50-41 Poor (50-31)NOCHPL NOCHE BUENA PL 10 NOCHE BUENA ST KENNETH ST R A 2 159 22 3,498 11/10/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 10 PLUMAS AV HILBY AV C O 2 1,883 37 69,671 11/10/2021 81 01/10/1993 AC OVERLAY 90-81 Good (90-71)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 20 HILBY AV SONOMA AV C O 2 1,325 37 49,025 11/10/2021 97 11/30/2020 1/2" LC, 1-3/4" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 30 SONOMA AV BROADWAY AV C O 2 1,026 37 37,962 11/10/2021 71 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 80-71 Good (90-71)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 40 BROADWAY AV PHOENIX AV C A 2 1,502 37 55,574 11/10/2021 78 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 80-71 Good (90-71)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 50 PHOENIX AV LA SALLE AV C O 2 1,256 37 46,472 11/10/2021 97 11/30/2020 1/2" LC, 1-3/4" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 60 LA SALLE AV SEASIDE HIGH ENTRANCE C O 2 1,900 37 70,300 11/10/2021 79 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 80-71 Good (90-71)NORMRD NORMANDY RD 10 CHAPEL DR PARKER FLATS CUT OFF RD A A 2 2,770 31 85,870 11/10/2021 71 80-71 Good (90-71)OCEACT OCEAN BLUFF COURT 10 PACIFIC CREST DRIVE END R A 2 330 33 10,890 11/09/2021 90 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)OCNHCT OCEAN HEIGHTS COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 380 33 12,540 11/09/2021 86 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)OLYMAV OLYMPIA AVE 02 END ROBERTS AVE R A 2 300 36 10,800 11/04/2021 47 50-41 Poor (50-31)OLYMAV OLYMPIA AVE 07 ROBERTS AVE CONTRA COSTA R A 2 404 40 16,160 11/04/2021 33 40-31 Poor (50-31)OLYMAV OLYMPIA AVE 10 DEL MONTE AVE ALHAMBRA ST R A 2 615 34 20,910 11/04/2021 23 30-21 Failed (30-0)OLYMAV OLYMPIA AVE 20 FREMONT WINTON ST R O 2 1,220 36 43,920 11/10/2021 41 10/10/1998 AC OVERLAY 50-41 Poor (50-31)OLYMAV OLYMPIA AVE 30 WINTON ST NOCHE BUENA ST R O 2 920 37 34,040 11/10/2021 49 10/10/1998 AC OVERLAY 50-41 Poor (50-31)ORDAVE ORD AVE 10 COE AVENUE PENINSULA POINT DRIVE R A 2 95 36 3,420 11/09/2021 82 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 05 DEL MONTE BLVD FREMONT AVE C A 2 342 36 12,312 11/03/2021 85 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 90-81 Good (90-71)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 15 FREMONT AVE LA JOLLA AVE C A 2 355 65 23,075 11/03/2021 83 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 90-81 Good (90-71)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 18 LA JOLLA AVE NOCHE BUENA C A 2 350 56 19,600 11/03/2021 79 11/01/2019 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 20 NOCHE BUENA ST WARING ST C A 2 998 57 56,886 11/03/2021 31 05/01/1984 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 30 WARING ST CROSS ST C A 2 286 66 18,876 11/03/2021 28 05/01/1984 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 40 CROSS ST HIGHLAND ST C A 2 1,115 36 40,140 11/03/2021 35 05/01/1984 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 50 HIGHLAND ST BUCHANAN ST C A 2 1,043 36 37,548 11/03/2021 59 05/01/1984 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 60 BUCHANAN ST MISSION MEMORIAL C A 2 1,217 35 42,595 11/03/2021 47 05/08/2007 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)PACIDR PACIFIC CREST DRIVE 10 COE AVENUE PENINSULA POINT DRIVE R A 2 950 33 31,350 11/09/2021 88 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71) 10/03/2022 Page 8 of 12
Packet Page 312
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition PALMAV PALM AVE 10 DEL MONTE BLVD HILLSDALE ST R S 2 944 32 30,208 11/04/2021 41 10/09/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31) PALMAV PALM AVE 20 HILLSDALE ST CALAVERAS ST R S 2 890 34 30,260 11/04/2021 42 10/09/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)PALMAV PALM AVE 30 FREMONT BLVD TERRACE ST R A 2 858 25 21,450 11/04/2021 24 01/01/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 30-21 Failed (30-0)PALMAV PALM AVE 40 TERRACE ST NOCHE BUENA ST R A 2 1,490 31 46,190 11/04/2021 70 01/10/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 70-61 Fair (70-51)PARACT PARADISE COVE COURT 10 SEA RIDGE COURT END R A 2 390 33 12,870 11/09/2021 90 07/21/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PARAAV PARALTA AVE 10 N. END MILITARY AVE (W) R S 2 1,431 13 18,603 11/03/2021 51 60-51 Fair (70-51)PARKPL PARK PL 10 LUXTON ST LOWELL ST R A 1 210 22 4,620 11/04/2021 26 30-21 Failed (30-0)PARKCF PARKER FLATS CUT OFF RD 10 NORMANDY RD 1403' N/O NORMANDY RD R A 2 1,403 26 36,478 11/10/2021 52 60-51 Fair (70-51)PENICT PENINSULA POINT COURT 10 PACIFIC CREST DRIVE END R A 2 195 33 6,435 11/09/2021 88 07/25/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 10 PACIFIC CREST DRIVE ORD AVE (ROUNDABOUT) R A 2 950 33 31,350 11/09/2021 90 07/24/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 20 ORD AVE (ROUNDABOUT) SEA RIDGE DR R A 2 1,245 33 41,085 11/09/2021 90 07/24/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 30 SEA RIDGE DRIVE ROUNDABOUT @ SEA BREEZE R A 2 610 33 20,130 11/09/2021 90 07/24/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 40 ROUNDABOUT @ SEA BREEZE ROUNDABOUT @ SEA CLIFF R A 2 461 33 15,213 11/09/2021 90 07/24/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 50 ROUNDABOUT @ SEA CLIFF ROUNDABOUT @ SUNSET VISTA R A 2 1,756 33 57,948 11/09/2021 90 07/25/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 60 ROUNDABOUT @ SUNSET VISTA E END R A 2 917 33 30,261 11/09/2021 90 07/25/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PHOEAV PHOENIX AVE 10 FREMONT BLVD BAKER ST R O 2 1,070 33 35,310 11/10/2021 63 01/21/1998 AC OVERLAY 70-61 Fair (70-51)PHOEAV PHOENIX AVE 20 BAKER ST NOCHE BUENA R O 2 639 33 21,087 11/10/2021 75 01/21/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)PLACST PLACER ST 10 HILBY AVE END R S 2 215 27 5,805 11/04/2021 66 70-61 Fair (70-51)PLAYAV PLAYA AVE 10 CITY LIMITS FREMONT BLVD C A 4 660 55 36,300 11/03/2021 95 11/30/2020 FULL DEPTH R&R 4.5" HMA 100-91 Excellent (100-91)PLAYAV PLAYA AVE 20 FREMONT BLVD CHANGE OF PAVEMENT R A 2 230 61 14,030 11/03/2021 95 11/30/2020 FULL DEPTH R&R 5.5" HMA 100-91 Excellent (100-91)PLAYAV PLAYA AVE 30 CHANGE OF PAVEMENT NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 700 37 25,900 11/03/2021 63 70-61 Fair (70-51)PLUMAV PLUMAS AV 10 HIGHLANDER DR NOCHE BUENA ST R A 2 1,316 37 48,692 11/10/2021 48 05/08/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)PLUMAV PLUMAS AV 20 NOCHE BUENA ST HIGHLAND ST C A 2 1,706 30 51,180 11/10/2021 41 05/01/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)PLUMAV PLUMAS AV 30 HIGHLAND ST MESCAL ST R S 2 616 21 12,936 11/10/2021 46 11/27/2009 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)PONDAV PONDEROSA AVE 10 DEL MONTE BLVD ALHAMBRA ST R S 2 271 36 9,756 11/04/2021 25 30-21 Failed (30-0)PROSST PROSPECT ST 10 END HILBY AVE R S 2 300 28 8,400 08/25/2022 62 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 70-61 Fair (70-51)PROSST PROSPECT ST 20 HILBY AVE TRINITY AVE R S 2 920 33 30,360 08/25/2022 54 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 60-51 Fair (70-51)RAINCT RAINIER CT 10 END MILITARY AVE R S 2 221 26 8,121 11/03/2021 55 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)RICACT RICARDO CT 10 END TWEED ST R A 2 320 32 11,160 11/10/2021 24 30-21 Failed (30-0)ROBRD ROBERTS AVE 10 OLYMPIA AVE HOME DEPOT PARKING LOT R A 2 302 30 9,060 11/12/2021 19 20-11 Failed (30-0)ROUSAV ROUSCH AVE 10 END NOCHE BUENA ST R A 2 1,942 32 62,144 11/10/2021 62 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 10 KIMBALL AVE ROUSCH AVE R S 2 485 32 15,520 11/10/2021 80 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 20 HILBY AVE WANDA AVE R S 2 505 33 16,665 11/08/2021 65 70-61 Fair (70-51)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 30 TRINITY AVE SONOMA AVE R S 2 515 28 14,420 08/25/2022 51 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 60-51 Fair (70-51)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 40 SONOMA AVE BROADWAY AVE R O 2 1,050 32 33,600 08/25/2022 55 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 60-51 Fair (70-51)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 50 BROADWAY AV OLYMPIA AV R S 2 338 31 10,478 11/04/2021 33 40-31 Poor (50-31)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 55 OLYMPIA AV 390' N/OLYMPIA AV R O 1 390 31 12,090 11/04/2021 77 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 65 390' N/OLYMPIA AV BAKER AVE R O 1 413 17 7,021 11/04/2021 77 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)SANPAV SAN PABLO AV 11 FREMONT BLVD BAKER ST C O 2 985 36 35,460 11/10/2021 22 05/22/2012 SLURRY SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)SANPAV SAN PABLO AV 14 BAKER ST NOCHE BUENA C O 2 436 36 15,696 11/10/2021 20 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 20-11 Failed (30-0)SANPAV SAN PABLO AV 15 NOCHE BUENA ST WARING ST C O 2 978 36 35,208 11/10/2021 80 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 80-71 Good (90-71)SANPAV SAN PABLO AV 20 WARING ST MENDOCINO ST C O 2 1,507 36 54,252 11/10/2021 81 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 90-81 Good (90-71)SANPAV SAN PABLO AV 30 MENDOCINO ST MESCAL ST/SAN PABLO AVE C O 2 951 36 34,236 11/10/2021 81 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 90-81 Good (90-71)SANPAV SAN PABLO AV 40 MESCAL ST/SAN PABLO AVE GENERAL JIM MOORE C O 2 1,790 36 64,440 11/10/2021 67 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 70-61 Fair (70-51)SANDDR SAND DUNES DR 10 CANYON DEL REY NORTH CITY LIMITS C A 2 988 24 23,712 11/12/2021 69 10/22/2018 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51) 10/03/2022 Page 9 of 12
Packet Page 313
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition SANTAV SANTA ANA AVE 10 MODOC ST SAN LUCAS ST R S 2 592 32 18,944 11/10/2021 50 05/08/2009 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31) SANTST SANTA BARBARA ST 20 BROADWAY AVE FREMONT BLVD R S 1 390 34 13,260 11/04/2021 27 30-21 Failed (30-0)SANCAV SANTA CLARA AVE 10 WARING ST LUZERN ST R S 2 1,026 33 33,858 11/03/2021 61 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)SEABCT SEA BREEZE COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 320 33 10,560 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEACCT SEA CLIFF COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 300 33 9,900 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEACRT SEA CREST COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 420 33 13,860 11/09/2021 90 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEACDR SEA CREST DRIVE 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE SEA CREST COURT R A 2 860 33 28,380 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEARCT SEA RIDGE COURT 10 COE AVENUE END R A 2 665 33 21,945 11/09/2021 88 07/21/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEARDR SEA RIDGE DRIVE 10 COE AVENUE PENINSULA POINT DRIVE R A 2 95 36 3,420 11/09/2021 82 07/21/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEASCT SEASCAPE COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 280 33 9,240 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEMICT SEMINOLE CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 184 34 6,256 11/02/2021 45 50-41 Poor (50-31)SERACT SERAPE CT 10 SAN PABLO AVE END R A 2 178 27 4,806 11/03/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)SHAFST SHAFER ST 10 KIMBALL AVE HILBY AVE R S 2 1,007 33 33,231 11/10/2021 64 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)SHAWCT SHAWNEE CT 10 END SAN PABLO AVE R A 2 163 22 3,586 11/03/2021 47 50-41 Poor (50-31)SHORCT SHORELINE COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 510 33 16,830 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SIDDST SIDDAL ST 10 HILBY AVE HARCOURT AVE (N) R S 2 333 32 10,656 08/25/2022 48 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)SIERAV SIERRA AVE 10 YOSEMITE ST MESCAL ST R A 2 686 36 24,696 11/02/2021 45 50-41 Poor (50-31)SKYVDR SKYVIEW DR 10 MESCAL ST SKYVIEW DR R A 1 1,790 24 42,960 11/06/2021 62 70-61 Fair (70-51)SONOAV SONOMA AV 10 CANYON DEL REY BLVD HILLSDALE ST C S 2 1,390 36 50,040 11/11/2021 41 50-41 Poor (50-31)SONOAV SONOMA AV 100 YOSEMITE ST MESCAL ST C A 2 853 36 30,708 11/11/2021 38 40-31 Poor (50-31)SONOAV SONOMA AV 20 HILLSDALE ST ALHAMBRA ST C S 2 458 36 16,488 11/11/2021 35 40-31 Poor (50-31)SONOAV SONOMA AV 30 ALHAMBRA ST FREMONT BLVD C S 2 555 36 19,980 11/11/2021 41 50-41 Poor (50-31)SONOAV SONOMA AV 40 FREMONT BLVD TERRACE ST C A 2 1,225 36 44,100 11/11/2021 90 11/30/2020 4" MILL AND FILL 90-81 Good (90-71)SONOAV SONOMA AV 50 TERRACE ST SAN LUCAS ST C S 2 762 36 27,432 11/11/2021 23 30-21 Failed (30-0)SONOAV SONOMA AV 60 SAN LUCAS ST NOCHE BUENA ST C S 2 728 36 26,208 11/11/2021 25 30-21 Failed (30-0)SONOAV SONOMA AV 70 NOCHE BUENA ST KENNETH ST C A 2 238 32 7,616 11/11/2021 32 01/01/1995 RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) 40-31 Poor (50-31)SONOAV SONOMA AV 75 KENNETH ST WARING ST C A 2 662 32 21,184 11/11/2021 53 60-51 Fair (70-51)SONOAV SONOMA AV 80 HARDING ST SOTO ST C A 2 716 32 22,912 11/11/2021 36 40-31 Poor (50-31)SONOAV SONOMA AV 90 SOTO ST YOSEMITE ST C A 2 173 33 5,709 11/11/2021 35 40-31 Poor (50-31)SOTOST SOTO ST 10 SONOMA AVE END R A 1 956 21 20,076 11/03/2021 76 80-71 Good (90-71)SOTOST SOTO ST 20 BROADWAY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,032 21 21,672 11/03/2021 72 80-71 Good (90-71)SOTOST SOTO ST 30 MINGO AVE BROADWAY AVE R A 1 1,018 22 22,396 11/03/2021 41 11/15/2010 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)SOTOST SOTO ST 40 LA SALLE AVE MINGO AVE R A 2 1,683 22 37,026 11/03/2021 41 11/15/2010 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)STALST ST ALBANS ST 10 DARWIN ST HARDING ST R A 1 178 18 3,204 11/08/2021 34 40-31 Poor (50-31)STELST ST ELMO ST 10 LUZERN ST VALLEJO ST R A 1 188 18 3,384 11/08/2021 32 40-31 Poor (50-31)STHEST ST HELENA ST 10 LA SALLE AVE MINGO AVE R A 1 1,689 22 37,158 11/03/2021 50 50-41 Poor (50-31)STJAST ST JAMES ST 10 VALLEJO ST DARWIN ST R A 1 183 19 3,477 11/08/2021 35 40-31 Poor (50-31)STOWCT STOWE CT 10 SAN PABLO DOG BONE R A 2 180 21 3,780 11/03/2021 39 40-31 Poor (50-31)STOWCT STOWE CT 20 W. END E. END R A 2 350 27 9,450 11/03/2021 33 40-31 Poor (50-31)SUNNCT SUNNYHILL CT 10 KIMBALL AVE SUNNYHILL CT R A 2 868 32 27,776 11/10/2021 58 60-51 Fair (70-51)SUNSDR SUNSET VISTA DRIVE 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE (N) PENINSULA POINT DRIVE (S) R A 2 900 33 29,700 11/09/2021 89 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SUTTST SUTTER ST 10 HILBY AVE LOPEZ AVE R S 2 325 32 10,400 11/04/2021 84 90-81 Good (90-71)SUZACT SUZANNE CT 10 END ROUSCH AVE R S 2 270 26 7,670 11/10/2021 71 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)TERRST TERRACE ST 05 TRINITY AVE HAMILTON AVE R S 2 235 29 6,815 11/04/2021 34 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)TERRST TERRACE ST 10 HAMILTON AVE SONOMA AVE R A 2 255 32 8,160 11/04/2021 84 08/01/2014 3" HMA OVERLAY 90-81 Good (90-71) 10/03/2022 Page 10 of 12
Packet Page 314
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition TERRST TERRACE ST 15 SONOMA AVE AMADOR AVE R O 2 260 36 9,360 08/25/2022 58 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 60-51 Fair (70-51) TERRST TERRACE ST 20 AMADOR AVE ELM AVE R O 2 260 36 9,360 11/04/2021 83 90-81 Good (90-71)TERRST TERRACE ST 25 ELM AVE BROADWAY AVE R O 2 535 34 18,190 08/25/2022 45 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)TERRST TERRACE ST 30 BROADWAY AVE ALLEY N/O CLEMENTINA R O 2 635 34 21,590 11/04/2021 24 01/19/1998 AC OVERLAY 30-21 Failed (30-0)THERST THERESA ST 10 HILBY AVE END R S 2 200 28 5,600 11/04/2021 24 04/08/1980 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)TIERST TIERRA ST 10 WILLIAMS AVE HILBY AVE R S 2 490 35 17,150 11/04/2021 18 04/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 20-11 Failed (30-0)TIOGAV TIOGA AVE 10 DEL MONTE AVE R/R TRACKS C A 3 220 43 9,460 11/10/2021 95 100-91 Excellent (100-91)TOROCT TORO CT 10 END CARSON ST R S 2 366 26 10,066 11/11/2021 59 05/06/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)TRINAV TRINITY AVE 10 SONOMA AVE HILLSDALE ST R S 2 1,254 33 41,382 11/11/2021 69 70-61 Fair (70-51)TRINAV TRINITY AVE 20 HILLSDALE ST WEST SIDE SPLIT R S 2 250 33 8,250 11/10/2021 34 04/08/1985 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)TRINAV TRINITY AVE 22 WEST SIDE SPLIT EAST SIDE SPLIT R S 2 585 40 23,400 11/10/2021 51 60-51 Fair (70-51)TRINAV TRINITY AVE 24 EAST SIDE SPLIT WEST SIDE SPLIT R S 2 585 40 23,400 11/10/2021 43 50-41 Poor (50-31)TRINAV TRINITY AVE 26 EAST SIDE SPLIT FREMONT BLVD R S 2 190 33 6,270 11/10/2021 15 20-11 Failed (30-0)TRINAV TRINITY AVE 30 FREMONT BLVD TERRACE ST R S 2 1,357 37 50,209 08/25/2022 49 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)TRINAV TRINITY AVE 40 TERRACE ST NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 1,473 36 53,028 08/25/2022 50 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)TWEEST TWEED ST 10 PLUMAS AVE KIMBALL AVE R A 2 864 32 27,648 11/10/2021 39 04/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)VALECT VALENCIA CT 10 YOSEMITE ST END R A 2 192 26 6,471 11/06/2021 53 05/08/2007 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)VALLPL VALLEJO PL 10 VALLEJO ST DARWIN ST R A 1 155 22 3,410 11/11/2021 41 50-41 Poor (50-31)VALLST VALLEJO ST 10 HILBY AVE END R A 2 454 24 12,015 11/06/2021 36 40-31 Poor (50-31)VALLST VALLEJO ST 20 END WANDA AVE R A 2 140 24 3,360 11/08/2021 35 40-31 Poor (50-31)VALLST VALLEJO ST 30 ST ELMO ST SONOMA AVE R A 1 410 24 9,840 11/08/2021 57 60-51 Fair (70-51)VALLST VALLEJO ST 35 SONOMA AVE ST JAMES ST R A 1 375 25 9,375 11/08/2021 22 30-21 Failed (30-0)VALLST VALLEJO ST 40 BROADWAY AVE ELM AVE R A 1 503 23 11,569 11/11/2021 52 60-51 Fair (70-51)VALLST VALLEJO ST 50 N. END BROADWAY AVE R A 1 1,240 23 28,520 11/11/2021 32 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)VALLST VALLEJO ST 60 LA SALLE AVE LUZERN PL R A 1 1,490 23 34,270 11/11/2021 35 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)VALMCT VALMAR CT 10 YOSEMITE ST (N) YOSEMITE ST (S) R A 2 234 24 5,616 11/06/2021 37 40-31 Poor (50-31)VELECT VELERTON CT 10 END YOSMITE ST R A 2 183 30 5,490 11/03/2021 46 05/08/2007 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)VILLCT VILLANOVA CT 10 END YOSEMITE ST R A 2 149 29 4,321 11/02/2021 41 05/08/2007 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)VIRGST VIRGINIA ST 05 HILBY AVE HARCOURT AVE R A 2 325 21 6,825 11/04/2021 18 10/01/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 20-11 Failed (30-0)VIRGST VIRGINIA ST 15 HARCOURT AVE WANDA AVE R A 2 315 21 6,615 11/04/2021 90 08/01/2014 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 90-81 Good (90-71)VIRGST VIRGINIA ST 20 WANDA AVE TRINITY AVE R A 2 145 27 3,915 11/04/2021 90 90-81 Good (90-71)WPLACE W PLACE 10 WARING ST JUDSON ST R A 1 203 22 4,466 11/10/2021 55 60-51 Fair (70-51)WANDAV WANDA AVE 10 VIRGINIA ST END R S 2 360 28 10,330 11/04/2021 24 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)WANDAV WANDA AVE 20 END PROSPECT ST R S 2 625 36 22,500 11/08/2021 75 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)WANDAV WANDA AVE 25 PROSPECT ST NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 1,305 32 41,760 11/08/2021 51 60-51 Fair (70-51)WANDAV WANDA AVE 30 NOCHE BUENA ST LUZERN ST R A 2 1,863 32 59,616 11/08/2021 40 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)WANDAV WANDA AVE 40 SOTO AVE YOSEMITE ST R A 2 173 36 6,228 11/06/2021 57 60-51 Fair (70-51)WANDAV WANDA AVE 50 YOSEMITE ST MESCAL ST R A 2 748 36 26,928 11/06/2021 43 50-41 Poor (50-31)WARIPL WARING PL 10 JUDSON ST WARING ST R A 1 150 22 3,300 11/10/2021 58 60-51 Fair (70-51)WARIST WARING ST 10 PLUMAS AVE KIMBALL AVE R S 2 865 31 26,815 11/04/2021 58 05/07/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)WARIST WARING ST 20 KIMBALL AVE HILBY AVE R S 2 1,020 32 32,640 11/04/2021 36 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)WARIST WARING ST 30 HILBY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,330 20 26,600 11/04/2021 55 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)WARIST WARING ST 40 SONOMA AVE BROADWAY AVE R A 1 1,057 20 21,140 11/04/2021 55 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)WARIST WARING ST 50 BROADWAY AVE FLORES PL R A 1 386 22 8,492 11/04/2021 54 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)WARIST WARING ST 60 WARING PL MINGO AVE R A 1 398 22 8,756 11/10/2021 43 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31) 10/03/2022 Page 11 of 12
Packet Page 315
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List Alphabetical
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition WARIST WARING ST 70 MINGO AVE W PLACE R A 1 655 22 14,410 11/10/2021 64 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51) WARIST WARING ST 80 SAN PABLO AVE LA SALLE AVE R A 2 662 23 15,226 11/03/2021 47 09/19/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)WARIST WARING ST 90 LA SALLE AVE MILITARY AVE R S 2 1,730 32 55,360 11/03/2021 33 09/19/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)WESTCT WESTMINSTER CT 10 YOSEMITE ST END R A 2 242 26 9,713 11/02/2021 42 50-41 Poor (50-31)WHEEST WHEELER ST 10 HILBY AV KIMBALL AV C S 2 1,017 32 32,544 09/01/2022 100 09/01/2022 FOAMED FDR, 4" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)WHEEST WHEELER ST 20 KIMBALL AVE END A S 2 811 25 20,275 11/11/2021 70 10/23/2018 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)WILLAV WILLIAMS AVE 10 CANYON DEL REY FREMONT BLVD R S 2 753 30 22,590 11/04/2021 26 04/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 30-21 Failed (30-0)WINTST WINTON ST 10 OLYMPIA AVE ALLEY N/O CLEMENTINA R S 2 393 36 14,148 11/04/2021 77 80-71 Good (90-71)YERBCT YERBA BUENA CT 10 YOSEMITE ST DOG BONE R A 2 252 32 8,064 11/02/2021 61 70-61 Fair (70-51)YERBCT YERBA BUENA CT 20 N. END S. END R A 2 370 26 9,620 11/02/2021 59 60-51 Fair (70-51)YOLACT YOLANDA CT 10 KIMBALL AVE END R A 2 301 33 10,842 11/10/2021 33 40-31 Poor (50-31)YOSEST YOSEMITE ST 10 SIERRA AV HILBY AV R A 2 515 36 18,540 11/02/2021 39 40-31 Poor (50-31)YOSEST YOSEMITE ST 20 HILBY AV BROADWAY AV C A 2 2,404 36 86,544 11/02/2021 38 05/08/2007 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)YOSEST YOSEMITE ST 30 BROADWAY AV MINGO AV C A 2 1,087 36 39,132 11/02/2021 32 05/08/2007 SLURRY SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31)YOSEST YOSEMITE ST 40 MINGO AV LA SALLE AV C A 2 1,777 36 63,972 11/02/2021 97 11/30/2020 FULL DEPTH R&R 7" HMA 100-91 Excellent (100-91)YOSEST YOSEMITE ST 50 LA SALLE AVE MILITARY AVE C S 2 1,623 32 51,936 11/02/2021 39 05/08/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 40-31 Poor (50-31) 10/03/2022 Page 12 of 12
Packet Page 316
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List by PCI (High to Low)
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition KIMBAV KIMBALL AV 10 FREMONT BLVD WHEELER ST C A 2 1,291 36 46,476 09/01/2022 100 09/01/2022 FOAMED FDR, 4" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91) WHEEST WHEELER ST 10 HILBY AV KIMBALL AV C S 2 1,017 32 32,544 09/01/2022 100 09/01/2022 FOAMED FDR, 4" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)CIRCAV CIRCLE AVE 10 MILITARY AVE NOCHE BUENA ST R A 2 826 32 26,432 11/03/2021 97 11/30/2020 4" MILL AND FILL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)CIRCAV CIRCLE AVE 20 NOCHE BUENA ST GRAND VIEW ST R A 2 230 34 7,820 11/03/2021 97 11/30/2020 4" MILL AND FILL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)HARTST HART ST 10 KIMBALL AVE END NCR A 2 200 30 6,000 11/11/2021 97 05/01/1982 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)MIRMAV MIRA MAR AVE 10 CROSS ST HIGHLAND ST R A 2 1,112 28 31,136 11/03/2021 97 11/30/2020 4" MILL AND FILL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 20 HILBY AV SONOMA AV C O 2 1,325 37 49,025 11/10/2021 97 11/30/2020 1/2" LC, 1-3/4" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 50 PHOENIX AV LA SALLE AV C O 2 1,256 37 46,472 11/10/2021 97 11/30/2020 1/2" LC, 1-3/4" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)YOSEST YOSEMITE ST 40 MINGO AV LA SALLE AV C A 2 1,777 36 63,972 11/02/2021 97 11/30/2020 FULL DEPTH R&R 7" HMA 100-91 Excellent (100-91)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 30 NOCHE BUENA ST SOTO ST A O 4 2,053 61 125,833 11/10/2021 96 11/30/2020 1/2" LC, 2" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 15 HILLSDALE AV CALAVERAS ST A A 4 915 35 32,025 11/10/2021 95 11/15/2018 RECONSTRUCTION (FULL DEPTH 6" HMA) 100-91 Excellent (100-91)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 18 CALAVERAS ST FREMONT BLVD A A 4 530 52 27,560 11/10/2021 95 11/15/2018 RECONSTRUCTION (FULL DEPTH 6" HMA) 100-91 Excellent (100-91)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 50 CHANGE OF PAVEMENT AUTO CENTER PKWY A A 4 1,000 62 62,000 11/06/2021 95 09/01/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 60 AUTO CENTER PKWY FREMONT BLVD A A 2 2,450 60 147,000 11/06/2021 95 05/07/2007 SLURRY SEAL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)ECHOAV ECHO AVE 20 FREMONT BLVD BAKER ST R A 4 1,010 86 86,860 11/10/2021 95 11/30/2020 RECON STRUCTURE w/ 3" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)HILBAV HILBY AV 20 FREMONT BLVD SHAFER ST C A 2 1,655 36 59,580 11/02/2021 95 100-91 Excellent (100-91)HILBAV HILBY AV 30 SHAFER ST NOCHE BUENA ST C A 2 1,463 36 52,668 11/02/2021 95 05/05/1984 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)HILBAV HILBY AV 40 NOCHE BUENA ST WARING ST C A 2 864 36 31,104 11/02/2021 95 05/05/1986 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)HILBAV HILBY AV 50 WARING ST YOSEMITE ST C A 2 1,292 36 46,512 11/02/2021 95 100-91 Excellent (100-91)LASALA LA SALLE AV 05 DEL MONTE BLVD FREMONT BLVD C A 4 443 60 26,580 11/03/2021 95 11/30/2020 FULL DEPTH R&R 6" HMA 100-91 Excellent (100-91)LUZEST LUZERN ST 10 HILBY AVE CHANGE OF PAVEMENT R A 2 220 24 5,280 11/05/2021 95 100-91 Excellent (100-91)MILIAV MILITARY AV 10 FREMONT BLVD CIRCLE AV C A 2 445 37 16,465 11/09/2021 95 11/30/2020 1/2" LC, 1-3/4" HMA OL 100-91 Excellent (100-91)PLAYAV PLAYA AVE 10 CITY LIMITS FREMONT BLVD C A 4 660 55 36,300 11/03/2021 95 11/30/2020 FULL DEPTH R&R 4.5" HMA 100-91 Excellent (100-91)PLAYAV PLAYA AVE 20 FREMONT BLVD CHANGE OF PAVEMENT R A 2 230 61 14,030 11/03/2021 95 11/30/2020 FULL DEPTH R&R 5.5" HMA 100-91 Excellent (100-91)TIOGAV TIOGA AVE 10 DEL MONTE AVE R/R TRACKS C A 3 220 43 9,460 11/10/2021 95 100-91 Excellent (100-91)BEACCT BEACH WOOD COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 430 33 14,190 11/09/2021 90 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)CLEMAV CLEMENTINA AVE 10 DEL MONTE BLVD 1ST ROUNDABOUT C A 2 350 30 10,500 11/04/2021 90 08/29/2008 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 90-81 Good (90-71)CLEMAV CLEMENTINA AVE 15 1ST ROUNDABOUT FREMONT BLVD C A 2 525 35 18,375 11/04/2021 90 90-81 Good (90-71)COEAVE COE AVENUE 15 PACIFIC CREST DRIVE BUTTERCUP BLVD C A 2 1,075 43 46,225 11/09/2021 90 90-81 Good (90-71)COEAVE COE AVENUE 20 BUTTERCUP BLVD 400' W/O ENTRY TO SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL C A 2 2,175 31 67,425 11/09/2021 90 90-81 Good (90-71)CYPRCT CYPRESS RIDGE COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 400 33 13,200 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 40 157' N/O CLEMENTINA AV CHANGE OF PAVEMENT A A 4 1,100 61 67,100 11/06/2021 90 08/01/2016 RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) 90-81 Good (90-71)OCEACT OCEAN BLUFF COURT 10 PACIFIC CREST DRIVE END R A 2 330 33 10,890 11/09/2021 90 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PARACT PARADISE COVE COURT 10 SEA RIDGE COURT END R A 2 390 33 12,870 11/09/2021 90 07/21/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 10 PACIFIC CREST DRIVE ORD AVE (ROUNDABOUT) R A 2 950 33 31,350 11/09/2021 90 07/24/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 20 ORD AVE (ROUNDABOUT) SEA RIDGE DR R A 2 1,245 33 41,085 11/09/2021 90 07/24/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 30 SEA RIDGE DRIVE ROUNDABOUT @ SEA BREEZE R A 2 610 33 20,130 11/09/2021 90 07/24/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 40 ROUNDABOUT @ SEA BREEZE ROUNDABOUT @ SEA CLIFF R A 2 461 33 15,213 11/09/2021 90 07/24/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 50 ROUNDABOUT @ SEA CLIFF ROUNDABOUT @ SUNSET VISTA R A 2 1,756 33 57,948 11/09/2021 90 07/25/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENIDR PENINSULA POINT DRIVE 60 ROUNDABOUT @ SUNSET VISTA E END R A 2 917 33 30,261 11/09/2021 90 07/25/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEABCT SEA BREEZE COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 320 33 10,560 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEACCT SEA CLIFF COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 300 33 9,900 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEACRT SEA CREST COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 420 33 13,860 11/09/2021 90 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEACDR SEA CREST DRIVE 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE SEA CREST COURT R A 2 860 33 28,380 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEASCT SEASCAPE COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 280 33 9,240 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71) 10/03/2022 Page 1 of 12
Packet Page 317
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List by PCI (High to Low)
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition SHORCT SHORELINE COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 510 33 16,830 11/09/2021 90 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71) SONOAV SONOMA AV 40 FREMONT BLVD TERRACE ST C A 2 1,225 36 44,100 11/11/2021 90 11/30/2020 4" MILL AND FILL 90-81 Good (90-71)VIRGST VIRGINIA ST 15 HARCOURT AVE WANDA AVE R A 2 315 21 6,615 11/04/2021 90 08/01/2014 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 90-81 Good (90-71)VIRGST VIRGINIA ST 20 WANDA AVE TRINITY AVE R A 2 145 27 3,915 11/04/2021 90 90-81 Good (90-71)SUNSDR SUNSET VISTA DRIVE 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE (N) PENINSULA POINT DRIVE (S) R A 2 900 33 29,700 11/09/2021 89 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)BAYCCR BAY CREST CIRCLE 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE (W) PENINSULA POINT DRIVE (E) R A 2 920 33 30,360 11/09/2021 88 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)BEACDR BEACH WOOD DRIVE 10 BEACH WOOD COURT SUNSET VISTA DRIVE R A 2 583 33 19,239 11/09/2021 88 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PACIDR PACIFIC CREST DRIVE 10 COE AVENUE PENINSULA POINT DRIVE R A 2 950 33 31,350 11/09/2021 88 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)PENICT PENINSULA POINT COURT 10 PACIFIC CREST DRIVE END R A 2 195 33 6,435 11/09/2021 88 07/25/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)SEARCT SEA RIDGE COURT 10 COE AVENUE END R A 2 665 33 21,945 11/09/2021 88 07/21/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)ECHOAV ECHO AVE 10 AUTO CENTER PKWY FREMONT BLVD C O 2 195 40 7,800 11/10/2021 87 08/01/2014 3" HMA OVERLAY 90-81 Good (90-71)OCNHCT OCEAN HEIGHTS COURT 10 PENINSULA POINT DRIVE END R A 2 380 33 12,540 11/09/2021 86 07/23/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)BUCHST BUCHANAN ST 10 ORD GROVE AVE MILITARY AVE R A 2 756 32 24,192 11/03/2021 85 12/11/2008 AC OVERLAY & PATCH (1.5 IN) 90-81 Good (90-71)ELMAVE ELM AVE 58 JUDSON ST WARING ST R A 2 174 32 5,568 11/11/2021 85 04/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 10 KIMBALL AV HILBY AV A C 2 1,118 34 38,012 11/05/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 30 SONOMA AV BROADWAY AV A C 2 1,165 34 39,610 11/05/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 40 BROADWAY AV BIRCH AV A A 2 1,244 34 42,296 11/05/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 50 BIRCH AV SAN PABLO AV A A 2 1,032 24 24,768 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 60 SAN PABLO AV PLAYA AV A A 2 1,190 24 28,560 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 70 PLAYA AV 255 N/O MILITARY AV (COP) A A 2 1,585 25 39,625 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 40 BIRCH AV BROADWAY AV A A 2 1,244 34 42,296 11/05/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 50 SAN PABLO AV BIRCH AV A A 2 1,032 24 24,768 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 60 PLAYA AV SAN PABLO AV A A 2 1,190 24 28,560 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 70 255 N/O MILITARY AV (COP) PLAYA AV A A 2 1,585 25 39,625 11/12/2021 85 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 60 END OF MEDIAN SOUTH CITY LIMITS A A 2 450 93 41,850 11/05/2021 85 90-81 Good (90-71)LOPEAV LOPEZ AVE 10 SUTTER STREET CHANGE OF PAVEMENT R S 2 245 36 8,820 11/04/2021 85 10/01/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)MILIAV MILITARY AV 20 CIRCLE AV NOCHE BUENA ST C A 2 335 37 12,395 11/09/2021 85 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 05 DEL MONTE BLVD FREMONT AVE C A 2 342 36 12,312 11/03/2021 85 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 20 SONOMA AV HILBY AV A C 2 1,421 34 48,314 11/05/2021 84 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 30 BROADWAY AV SONOMA AV A C 2 1,165 34 39,610 11/05/2021 84 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)MARPST MARIPOSA ST 10 LA SALLE AVE MILITARY AVE R A 2 1,624 32 51,968 11/03/2021 84 12/11/2008 AC OVERLAY & PATCH (1.5 IN) 90-81 Good (90-71)MONTRD MONTEREY RD 10 FREMONT BLVD CHANGE OF PAVEMENT C O 2 2,110 33 69,630 11/05/2021 84 90-81 Good (90-71)SUTTST SUTTER ST 10 HILBY AVE LOPEZ AVE R S 2 325 32 10,400 11/04/2021 84 90-81 Good (90-71)TERRST TERRACE ST 10 HAMILTON AVE SONOMA AVE R A 2 255 32 8,160 11/04/2021 84 08/01/2014 3" HMA OVERLAY 90-81 Good (90-71)BAKEST BAKER ST 20 BIRCH ST PHOENIX AVE (EAST) R A 2 354 32 11,328 11/10/2021 83 01/01/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 90-81 Good (90-71)CALAST CALAVERAS ST 15 ELM AVE BROADWAY AVE R S 2 525 31 16,275 11/04/2021 83 05/01/1985 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 20 HILBY AV SONOMA AV A C 4 1,421 34 48,314 11/05/2021 83 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 10 HILBY AV KIMBALL AV A C 2 1,118 34 38,012 11/05/2021 83 11/01/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)GENJIMNB GENERAL JIM MOORE (NB) 20 HILBY AV BRAODWAY AV A A 2 2,575 32 82,400 11/05/2021 83 90-81 Good (90-71)HIGHST HIGHLAND ST 50 ORD GROVE AVE MILITARY AVE R A 2 770 33 25,410 11/02/2021 83 90-81 Good (90-71)HILBAV HILBY AV 70 MESCAL ST GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD C A 3 250 48 12,000 11/02/2021 83 10/02/2019 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 15 FREMONT AVE LA JOLLA AVE C A 2 355 65 23,075 11/03/2021 83 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 90-81 Good (90-71)TERRST TERRACE ST 20 AMADOR AVE ELM AVE R O 2 260 36 9,360 11/04/2021 83 90-81 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 30 EUCALYPTUS RD BROADWAY AVE A A 2 5,100 64 326,400 11/05/2021 82 90-81 Good (90-71)LASALA LA SALLE AV 50 YOSEMITE ST LINCOLN ST (W) C O 2 930 36 33,480 11/03/2021 82 10/22/2018 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71) 10/03/2022 Page 2 of 12
Packet Page 318
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List by PCI (High to Low)
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition ORDAVE ORD AVE 10 COE AVENUE PENINSULA POINT DRIVE R A 2 95 36 3,420 11/09/2021 82 07/22/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71) SEARDR SEA RIDGE DRIVE 10 COE AVENUE PENINSULA POINT DRIVE R A 2 95 36 3,420 11/09/2021 82 07/21/2008 SLURRY SEAL 90-81 Good (90-71)AUTOPK AUTO CENTER PRKWY 10 CLEMENTINA AVE ROUNDABOUT @ ECHO AVE C A 2 1,225 26 31,850 11/10/2021 81 90-81 Good (90-71)BAKEST BAKER ST 40 ECHO AVE SAN PABLO AVE R A 2 360 20 7,200 11/10/2021 81 01/01/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 90-81 Good (90-71)GENJIMNB GENERAL JIM MOORE (NB) 30 BRAODWAY AVE EUCALYPTUS RD A A 2 5,100 32 163,200 11/05/2021 81 90-81 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 20 COE AV EUCALYPTUS RD A A 2 653 33 21,549 11/05/2021 81 90-81 Good (90-71)LASALA LA SALLE AV 30 WARING ST LUZERN ST C A 2 1,044 36 37,584 11/03/2021 81 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 90-81 Good (90-71)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 10 PLUMAS AV HILBY AV C O 2 1,883 37 69,671 11/10/2021 81 01/10/1993 AC OVERLAY 90-81 Good (90-71)SANPAV SAN PABLO AV 20 WARING ST MENDOCINO ST C O 2 1,507 36 54,252 11/10/2021 81 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 90-81 Good (90-71)SANPAV SAN PABLO AV 30 MENDOCINO ST MESCAL ST/SAN PABLO AVE C O 2 951 36 34,236 11/10/2021 81 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 90-81 Good (90-71)AUTOPK AUTO CENTER PRKWY 20 ROUNDABOUT @ ECHO DEL MONTE BLVD C A 2 720 60 43,200 11/10/2021 80 05/14/1991 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)CALAST CALAVERAS ST 30 BROADWAY AVE CLEMENTINA AVE C A 2 643 26 16,718 11/04/2021 80 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMNB GENERAL JIM MOORE (NB) 10 END OF MEDIAN HILBY AV A A 2 2,526 32 80,832 11/05/2021 80 80-71 Good (90-71)MONTRD MONTEREY RD 20 COE AV 190' S/O BUNA LOOP (COP) R A 2 720 34 24,480 11/06/2021 80 80-71 Good (90-71)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 10 KIMBALL AVE ROUSCH AVE R S 2 485 32 15,520 11/10/2021 80 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)SANPAV SAN PABLO AV 15 NOCHE BUENA ST WARING ST C O 2 978 36 35,208 11/10/2021 80 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 80-71 Good (90-71)ELMAVE ELM AVE 25 CALAVERAS ST FREMONT BLVD R S 2 300 32 9,600 11/11/2021 79 10/15/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)ELMAVE ELM AVE 50 NOCHE BUENA ST JUDSON ST R A 2 707 32 22,624 11/11/2021 79 01/10/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMNB GENERAL JIM MOORE (NB) 40 EUCALYPTUS RD COE AV A A 2 653 33 21,549 11/05/2021 79 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMNB GENERAL JIM MOORE (NB) 50 COE AVE ARLONCOURT RD A A 2 2,435 33 80,355 11/05/2021 79 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 10 ARLONCOURT RD COE AV A A 2 2,435 33 80,355 11/05/2021 79 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 50 HILBY AV END OF MEDIAN A A 2 2,526 32 80,832 11/05/2021 79 80-71 Good (90-71)HILBAV HILBY AV 60 YOSEMITE ST MESCAL ST C A 2 994 36 35,784 11/02/2021 79 10/03/2019 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)MENDST MENDOCINO ST 30 LA SALLE AVE MILITARY AVE R A 2 1,632 32 52,224 11/03/2021 79 12/10/2008 AC OVERLAY & PATCH (1.5 IN) 80-71 Good (90-71)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 60 LA SALLE AV SEASIDE HIGH ENTRANCE C O 2 1,900 37 70,300 11/10/2021 79 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 80-71 Good (90-71)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 18 LA JOLLA AVE NOCHE BUENA C A 2 350 56 19,600 11/03/2021 79 11/01/2019 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 10 DEL MONTE BLVD HILLSDALE AV A O 4 650 61 39,650 11/10/2021 78 11/15/2018 3" HMA OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 10SB CANYON DEL REY BLVD CITY LIMIT A A 2 1,145 27 30,915 11/06/2021 78 11/13/2009 RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) 80-71 Good (90-71)GENJIMSB GENERAL JIM MOORE (SB) 40 BROADWAY AV HILBY AV A A 2 2,575 32 82,400 11/05/2021 78 80-71 Good (90-71)LASALA LA SALLE AV 40 LUZERN ST YOSEMITE ST C A 2 910 36 32,760 11/03/2021 78 10/22/2018 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 40 BROADWAY AV PHOENIX AV C A 2 1,502 37 55,574 11/10/2021 78 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 80-71 Good (90-71)GOODST GOODWIN ST 10 BAKER ST OLYMPIA AVE R A 1 1,410 17 23,970 11/10/2021 77 01/10/1998 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 80-71 Good (90-71)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 55 OLYMPIA AV 390' N/OLYMPIA AV R O 1 390 31 12,090 11/04/2021 77 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 65 390' N/OLYMPIA AV BAKER AVE R O 1 413 17 7,021 11/04/2021 77 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)WINTST WINTON ST 10 OLYMPIA AVE ALLEY N/O CLEMENTINA R S 2 393 36 14,148 11/04/2021 77 80-71 Good (90-71)HIGHST HIGHLAND ST 40 LA SALLE AVE ORD GROVE AVE R A 2 900 33 29,700 11/02/2021 76 12/10/2008 AC OVERLAY & PATCH (1.5 IN) 80-71 Good (90-71)LAGUST LAGUNA ST 20 PHOENIX AVE OLYMPIA AVE R O 1 1,140 17 19,380 11/10/2021 76 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)LIGHTDREB LIGHTFIGHTER DRIVE (EB) 10 HWY 1 GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD A A 2 2,547 49 124,803 11/10/2021 76 80-71 Good (90-71)MONTRD MONTEREY RD 15 CHANGE OF PAVEMENT COE AVE C O 2 810 33 26,730 11/05/2021 76 80-71 Good (90-71)SOTOST SOTO ST 10 SONOMA AVE END R A 1 956 21 20,076 11/03/2021 76 80-71 Good (90-71)ALLSST ALLSTON ST 10 HARCOURT AVE TRINITY AVE R S 2 231 32 7,392 11/15/2021 75 80-71 Good (90-71)COEAVE COE AVENUE 10 MONTEREY RD PACIFIC CREST DRIVE C A 2 2,779 43 119,497 11/09/2021 75 80-71 Good (90-71)COEAVE COE AVENUE 30 400' W/O ENTRY TO SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY TO SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL C A 2 400 43 17,200 11/09/2021 75 80-71 Good (90-71)COEAVE COE AVENUE 40 ENTRY TO SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD C A 2 245 67 16,415 11/09/2021 75 80-71 Good (90-71)LASALA LA SALLE AV 20 NOCHE BUENA ST WARING ST C A 2 916 36 32,976 11/03/2021 75 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 80-71 Good (90-71) 10/03/2022 Page 3 of 12
Packet Page 319
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List by PCI (High to Low)
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition LOWEST LOWELL ST 20 BROADWAY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,065 17 18,105 11/04/2021 75 01/22/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 80-71 Good (90-71) PHOEAV PHOENIX AVE 20 BAKER ST NOCHE BUENA R O 2 639 33 21,087 11/10/2021 75 01/21/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)WANDAV WANDA AVE 20 END PROSPECT ST R S 2 625 36 22,500 11/08/2021 75 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 20 FREMONT BLVD NOCHE BUENA ST A A 4 2,310 61 140,910 11/10/2021 74 10/02/2019 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)HILTST HILTON ST 10 OLYMPIA AVE BAKER ST R O 1 1,890 17 32,130 11/10/2021 74 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)JUDSST JUDSON ST 20 BROADWAY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,050 17 17,850 11/04/2021 74 04/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)LUXTST LUXTON ST 20 HILBY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,320 17 22,440 11/04/2021 73 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)LAGUST LAGUNA ST 10 LA SALLE AVE PHOENIX AVE R O 1 1,270 17 21,590 11/10/2021 72 01/15/1998 AC OVERLAY 80-71 Good (90-71)MILIAV MILITARY AV 30 NOCHE BUENA ST CROSS ST C S 2 1,100 37 40,700 11/09/2021 72 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 80-71 Good (90-71)SOTOST SOTO ST 20 BROADWAY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,032 21 21,672 11/03/2021 72 80-71 Good (90-71)HACIST HACIENDA ST 10 ORD GROVE AVE MILITARY AVE R S 2 764 32 24,448 11/03/2021 71 80-71 Good (90-71)LUXTST LUXTON ST 30 SONOMA AVE BROADWAY AVE R A 1 1,060 17 18,020 11/04/2021 71 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)NOCHST NOCHE BUENA ST 30 SONOMA AV BROADWAY AV C O 2 1,026 37 37,962 11/10/2021 71 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 80-71 Good (90-71)NORMRD NORMANDY RD 10 CHAPEL DR PARKER FLATS CUT OFF RD A A 2 2,770 31 85,870 11/10/2021 71 80-71 Good (90-71)SUZACT SUZANNE CT 10 END ROUSCH AVE R S 2 270 26 7,670 11/10/2021 71 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 80-71 Good (90-71)LASALA LA SALLE AV 10 FREMONT BLVD NOCHE BUENA ST C A 2 1,200 42 50,400 11/03/2021 70 11/04/2020 MICROSURFACING 70-61 Fair (70-51)PALMAV PALM AVE 40 TERRACE ST NOCHE BUENA ST R A 2 1,490 31 46,190 11/04/2021 70 01/10/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 70-61 Fair (70-51)WHEEST WHEELER ST 20 KIMBALL AVE END A S 2 811 25 20,275 11/11/2021 70 10/23/2018 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)CLEMAV CLEMENTINA AVE 20 FREMONT BLVD WINTON ST R O 2 1,086 32 34,752 11/04/2021 69 01/21/1998 AC OVERLAY 70-61 Fair (70-51)SANDDR SAND DUNES DR 10 CANYON DEL REY NORTH CITY LIMITS C A 2 988 24 23,712 11/12/2021 69 10/22/2018 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)TRINAV TRINITY AVE 10 SONOMA AVE HILLSDALE ST R S 2 1,254 33 41,382 11/11/2021 69 70-61 Fair (70-51)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 80 255' N/O MILITARY AV (COP) CITY LIMIT (N) A A 2 635 26 16,510 09/01/2022 68 09/01/2022 MICROSURFACING 70-61 Fair (70-51)LIGHDR LIGHTFIGHTER DRIVE 20 GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD END OF MEDIAN C A 2 375 49 18,375 11/10/2021 68 70-61 Fair (70-51)ALYNOELM ALLEY N/O ELM 50 FREMONT BLVD EAST END AT GATE O S 1 110 15 1,650 04/22/1999 67 05/01/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)BROAAV BROADWAY AV 40 SOTO ST GENERAL JIM MOORE A O 4 2,275 58 131,950 11/10/2021 67 10/02/2019 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)SANPAV SAN PABLO AV 40 MESCAL ST/SAN PABLO AVE GENERAL JIM MOORE C O 2 1,790 36 64,440 11/10/2021 67 11/01/2019 SLURRY Layer of CAPE 70-61 Fair (70-51)BOLECT BOLES CT 10 END WARING ST R S 2 202 28 5,656 11/04/2021 66 05/06/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)LUXTST LUXTON ST 10 HILBY AVE END R S 2 438 26 11,388 11/04/2021 66 05/01/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)MENDCT MENDOCINO CT 10 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 219 22 6,627 11/03/2021 66 70-61 Fair (70-51)PLACST PLACER ST 10 HILBY AVE END R S 2 215 27 5,805 11/04/2021 66 70-61 Fair (70-51)BAKEST BAKER ST 50 SAN PABLO AVE LA SALLE AVE R S 2 700 20 14,000 11/10/2021 65 70-61 Fair (70-51)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 20 HILBY AVE WANDA AVE R S 2 505 33 16,665 11/08/2021 65 70-61 Fair (70-51)FLORST FLORES ST 10 HILBY AVE END R A 2 132 24 3,168 11/06/2021 64 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)HILBAV HILBY AV 10 CANYON DEL REY FREMONT BLVD C A 2 1,385 36 49,860 11/02/2021 64 10/22/2018 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)LINCST LINCOLN ST 20 LA SALLE AVE ORD GROVE AVE R S 2 868 32 27,776 11/03/2021 64 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)LOWEST LOWELL ST 30 SONOMA AVE HILBY AVE R S 1 1,330 17 22,610 11/04/2021 64 05/06/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)SHAFST SHAFER ST 10 KIMBALL AVE HILBY AVE R S 2 1,007 33 33,231 11/10/2021 64 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)WARIST WARING ST 70 MINGO AVE W PLACE R A 1 655 22 14,410 11/10/2021 64 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)ANDRCT ANDREW CT 10 NAPA ST END R S 2 340 26 11,215 11/03/2021 63 05/01/1988 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)FREMBLNB FREMONT BL (NB) 05 CITY LIMIT (S) KIMBALL AV A C 2 720 34 24,480 09/01/2022 63 09/01/2022 MICROSURFACING 70-61 Fair (70-51)GIGLRD GIGLING RD 20 1ST AV 480' FROM END @ CHANGE OF PAVEMENT C A 2 1,058 31 32,798 11/09/2021 63 70-61 Fair (70-51)GRANST GRANADA ST 10 MESCAL ST MINGO AVE R A 2 539 27 14,553 11/03/2021 63 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)HARCAV HARCOURT AV 35 300' @ WIDTH CHANGE SIDDAL ST R S 2 138 18 2,484 08/25/2022 63 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 70-61 Fair (70-51)LIGHTDRWB LIGHTFIGHTER DRIVE (WB) 10 GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD HWY 1 A A 2 2,547 49 124,803 11/10/2021 63 70-61 Fair (70-51)PHOEAV PHOENIX AVE 10 FREMONT BLVD BAKER ST R O 2 1,070 33 35,310 11/10/2021 63 01/21/1998 AC OVERLAY 70-61 Fair (70-51) 10/03/2022 Page 4 of 12
Packet Page 320
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List by PCI (High to Low)
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition PLAYAV PLAYA AVE 30 CHANGE OF PAVEMENT NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 700 37 25,900 11/03/2021 63 70-61 Fair (70-51) FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 05 KIMBALL AV CITY LIMIT (S) A C 2 720 34 24,480 09/01/2022 62 09/01/2022 MICROSURFACING 70-61 Fair (70-51)GRANST GRANADA ST 20 MINGO AVE SAN PABLO AVE R A 2 1,012 22 22,264 11/03/2021 62 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)HAMIAV HAMILTON AVE 30 FREMONT BLVD TERRACE ST R S 2 1,265 32 40,480 08/25/2022 62 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 70-61 Fair (70-51)MESCPL MESCAL PL 10 MESCAL ST END R A 2 172 20 3,440 11/06/2021 62 70-61 Fair (70-51)MONOCT MONO CT 10 ROUSCH AVE END R A 2 174 27 5,318 11/10/2021 62 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)PROSST PROSPECT ST 10 END HILBY AVE R S 2 300 28 8,400 08/25/2022 62 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 70-61 Fair (70-51)ROUSAV ROUSCH AVE 10 END NOCHE BUENA ST R A 2 1,942 32 62,144 11/10/2021 62 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)SKYVDR SKYVIEW DR 10 MESCAL ST SKYVIEW DR R A 1 1,790 24 42,960 11/06/2021 62 70-61 Fair (70-51)1STAVE 1ST AVE 10 1ST ST LIGHTFIGHTER DR R A 2 2,139 29 62,031 11/10/2021 61 70-61 Fair (70-51)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 20 CANYON DEL REY BLVD BROADWAY AV A O 4 1,115 60 66,900 11/06/2021 61 10/31/2018 SLURRY SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)LUZEST LUZERN ST 60 LA SALLE AVE MIRA MONTE AVE R S 2 615 30 18,450 11/03/2021 61 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)SANCAV SANTA CLARA AVE 10 WARING ST LUZERN ST R S 2 1,026 33 33,858 11/03/2021 61 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 70-61 Fair (70-51)YERBCT YERBA BUENA CT 10 YOSEMITE ST DOG BONE R A 2 252 32 8,064 11/02/2021 61 70-61 Fair (70-51)FREMBLSB FREMONT BL (SB) 80 CITY LIMIT (N) 255' N/O MILITARY AV (COP) A A 2 635 26 16,510 09/01/2022 60 09/01/2022 MICROSURFACING 60-51 Fair (70-51)HAVITE HAVILAND TERRACE 10 KIMBALL AVE (W) KIMBALL AVE (E) R A 2 855 32 27,360 11/04/2021 60 60-51 Fair (70-51)CONTST CONTRA COSTA ST 20 SONOMA AVE BROADWAY AVE R S 2 1,060 31 32,860 11/04/2021 59 05/05/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)FLORST FLORES ST 20 END (N) END (S) R A 2 1,065 24 27,863 11/08/2021 59 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)HARCAV HARCOURT AV 10 CANYON DEL REY BLVD FREMONT BLVD C S 2 1,815 42 76,230 11/02/2021 59 60-51 Fair (70-51)HAVAST HAVANA ST 10 LA SALLE AVE GRANADA ST R A 1 1,719 22 37,818 11/03/2021 59 05/07/2009 CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)MALTCT MALTA CT 10 END TWEED ST R A 2 434 32 14,498 11/10/2021 59 60-51 Fair (70-51)NADIST NADINA ST 10 LA SALLE AVE SAN PABLO AVE R A 2 704 21 14,784 11/03/2021 59 60-51 Fair (70-51)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 50 HIGHLAND ST BUCHANAN ST C A 2 1,043 36 37,548 11/03/2021 59 05/01/1984 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)TOROCT TORO CT 10 END CARSON ST R S 2 366 26 10,066 11/11/2021 59 05/06/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)YERBCT YERBA BUENA CT 20 N. END S. END R A 2 370 26 9,620 11/02/2021 59 60-51 Fair (70-51)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 10NB CITY LIMIT CANYON DEL REY BLVD A A 2 1,145 37 42,365 11/06/2021 58 06/04/2010 RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) 60-51 Fair (70-51)SUNNCT SUNNYHILL CT 10 KIMBALL AVE SUNNYHILL CT R A 2 868 32 27,776 11/10/2021 58 60-51 Fair (70-51)TERRST TERRACE ST 15 SONOMA AVE AMADOR AVE R O 2 260 36 9,360 08/25/2022 58 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 60-51 Fair (70-51)WARIPL WARING PL 10 JUDSON ST WARING ST R A 1 150 22 3,300 11/10/2021 58 60-51 Fair (70-51)WARIST WARING ST 10 PLUMAS AVE KIMBALL AVE R S 2 865 31 26,815 11/04/2021 58 05/07/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)JUDSST JUDSON ST 50 W PLACE MINGO AVE R A 1 675 22 14,850 11/10/2021 57 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)MADRCT MADRID CT 10 KIMBALL AVE END R A 2 400 33 13,200 11/04/2021 57 60-51 Fair (70-51)VALLST VALLEJO ST 30 ST ELMO ST SONOMA AVE R A 1 410 24 9,840 11/08/2021 57 60-51 Fair (70-51)WANDAV WANDA AVE 40 SOTO AVE YOSEMITE ST R A 2 173 36 6,228 11/06/2021 57 60-51 Fair (70-51)CONTST CONTRA COSTA ST 10 HAMILTON AVE SONOMA AVE R S 2 214 33 7,062 11/04/2021 56 05/01/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)KENNST KENNETH ST 10 HILBY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,310 17 22,270 11/04/2021 56 01/20/1995 RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 60-51 Fair (70-51)LOWEST LOWELL ST 60 SAN PABLO AVE L PLACE R A 1 266 22 5,852 11/11/2021 56 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)LUZEST LUZERN ST 70 MIRA MONTE AVE ORD GROVE AVE R S 2 245 32 7,840 11/03/2021 56 60-51 Fair (70-51)MILIAV MILITARY AV 40 CROSS ST HIGHLAND ST C S 2 1,331 37 49,247 11/09/2021 56 60-51 Fair (70-51)DELMBL DEL MONTE BLVD 30 BROADWAY AV 157' N/O CLEMINTINA AV A A 4 1,586 61 96,746 11/06/2021 55 09/01/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)FLORST FLORES ST 30 END BROADWAY AVE R A 2 537 33 17,721 11/10/2021 55 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)HARDST HARDING ST 10 ST ALBINS HILBY AVE R A 1 1,715 25 42,875 11/08/2021 55 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)LPLACE L PLACE 10 LUXTON ST LOWELL ST R A 1 177 22 3,894 11/11/2021 55 60-51 Fair (70-51)MESCCT MESCAL CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 164 37 6,981 11/10/2021 55 60-51 Fair (70-51)MILIAV MILITARY AV 60 BUCHANAN ST PARALTA AV (W) C S 2 1,340 37 49,580 11/09/2021 55 60-51 Fair (70-51) 10/03/2022 Page 5 of 12
Packet Page 321
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List by PCI (High to Low)
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition RAINCT RAINIER CT 10 END MILITARY AVE R S 2 221 26 8,121 11/03/2021 55 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51) SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 40 SONOMA AVE BROADWAY AVE R O 2 1,050 32 33,600 08/25/2022 55 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 60-51 Fair (70-51)WPLACE W PLACE 10 WARING ST JUDSON ST R A 1 203 22 4,466 11/10/2021 55 60-51 Fair (70-51)WARIST WARING ST 30 HILBY AVE SONOMA AVE R A 1 1,330 20 26,600 11/04/2021 55 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)WARIST WARING ST 40 SONOMA AVE BROADWAY AVE R A 1 1,057 20 21,140 11/04/2021 55 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)ALHAST ALHAMBRA ST 15 SONOMA AVE ELM AVE R S 2 501 35 17,535 11/04/2021 54 09/01/1984 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)DARWST DARWIN ST 40 ELM AVE BROADWAY AVE R A 1 506 24 12,144 11/11/2021 54 60-51 Fair (70-51)JUDSST JUDSON ST 30 SONOMA AVE HILBY AVE R S 1 1,325 17 22,525 11/04/2021 54 05/12/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)JUDSST JUDSON ST 40 MINGO AVE LUXTON PL R A 1 625 22 13,750 11/10/2021 54 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)KIMBAV KIMBALL AV 20 WHEELER ST SHAFER ST C A 2 790 36 28,440 11/11/2021 54 60-51 Fair (70-51)LAURLN LAURA LN 10 NOCHE BUENA GRANDVIEW ST O A 1 225 8 1,800 02/24/2018 54 60-51 Fair (70-51)LOWEST LOWELL ST 70 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 326 22 9,547 11/11/2021 54 60-51 Fair (70-51)LUXTST LUXTON ST 80 SAN PABLO AVE LA SALLE AVE R A 1 720 22 15,840 11/11/2021 54 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)PROSST PROSPECT ST 20 HILBY AVE TRINITY AVE R S 2 920 33 30,360 08/25/2022 54 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 60-51 Fair (70-51)WARIST WARING ST 50 BROADWAY AVE FLORES PL R A 1 386 22 8,492 11/04/2021 54 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)CARSST CARSON ST 10 WHEELER ST KIMBALL AVE R S 2 1,021 25 25,525 11/11/2021 53 04/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)FLORPL FLORES PL 10 WARING ST FLORES ST R A 1 169 23 3,887 11/04/2021 53 60-51 Fair (70-51)LOWEST LOWELL ST 50 LOWELL PL MINGO AVE R A 1 580 22 12,760 11/10/2021 53 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)LYSECT LYSETTE CT 10 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 236 26 9,557 11/03/2021 53 60-51 Fair (70-51)MENDST MENDOCINO ST 20 MINGO AVE MENDOCINO PL R A 1 1,410 22 31,020 11/03/2021 53 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)MINGAV MINGO AV 30 MESCAL ST GRANADA ST C A 2 517 37 19,129 11/03/2021 53 60-51 Fair (70-51)SONOAV SONOMA AV 75 KENNETH ST WARING ST C A 2 662 32 21,184 11/11/2021 53 60-51 Fair (70-51)VALECT VALENCIA CT 10 YOSEMITE ST END R A 2 192 26 6,471 11/06/2021 53 05/08/2007 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)ELMAVE ELM AVE 70 VALLEJO ST DARWIN ST R A 1 213 22 4,686 11/11/2021 52 60-51 Fair (70-51)JUDSST JUDSON ST 60 LA SALLE AVE END R A 1 920 22 20,240 11/11/2021 52 08/15/2012 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)LOWEST LOWELL ST 40 MINGO AVE KENNETH PL R A 1 584 22 12,848 11/10/2021 52 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)MILIAV MILITARY AV 50 HIGHLAND ST BUCHANAN ST C S 2 1,045 37 38,665 11/09/2021 52 60-51 Fair (70-51)MODOST MODOC ST 10 KIMBALL AVE ROUSCH AVE R S 2 483 32 15,456 11/10/2021 52 05/08/2009 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)PARKCF PARKER FLATS CUT OFF RD 10 NORMANDY RD 1403' N/O NORMANDY RD R A 2 1,403 26 36,478 11/10/2021 52 60-51 Fair (70-51)VALLST VALLEJO ST 40 BROADWAY AVE ELM AVE R A 1 503 23 11,569 11/11/2021 52 60-51 Fair (70-51)DARWST DARWIN ST 70 MINGO AVE H PLACE R A 2 424 22 9,328 11/11/2021 51 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)HARCAV HARCOURT AV 40 NOCHE BUENA ST PROSPECT ST R S 2 1,450 33 47,850 11/02/2021 51 04/08/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 60-51 Fair (70-51)MONSCT MONSERAT CT 10 MINGO AVE (W) MINGO AVE (E) R A 2 163 33 5,379 11/03/2021 51 60-51 Fair (70-51)PARAAV PARALTA AVE 10 N. END MILITARY AVE (W) R S 2 1,431 13 18,603 11/03/2021 51 60-51 Fair (70-51)SANLST SAN LUCAS ST 30 TRINITY AVE SONOMA AVE R S 2 515 28 14,420 08/25/2022 51 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 60-51 Fair (70-51)TRINAV TRINITY AVE 22 WEST SIDE SPLIT EAST SIDE SPLIT R S 2 585 40 23,400 11/10/2021 51 60-51 Fair (70-51)WANDAV WANDA AVE 25 PROSPECT ST NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 1,305 32 41,760 11/08/2021 51 60-51 Fair (70-51)AMADAV AMADOR AVE 40 TERRACE ST NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 1,487 32 47,584 08/25/2022 50 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)BAKEST BAKER ST 10 WINTON ST (AT ALLEY) BIRCH AVE R S 2 450 33 14,850 11/10/2021 50 50-41 Poor (50-31)CADICT CADIZ COURT 10 SHAFER STREET END R A 2 250 27 6,750 11/10/2021 50 05/01/1985 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)DOUGCT DOUGLAS CT 10 KIMBALL AVE END R S 2 350 26 9,100 11/04/2021 50 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)HARDST HARDING ST 40 H PLACE MINGO AVE R A 2 475 22 10,450 11/11/2021 50 09/19/2011 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)HIGHST HIGHLAND ST 20 BROADWAY AVE MINGO AVE R S 2 1,014 32 32,448 11/02/2021 50 11/15/2010 SEAL CRACKS 50-41 Poor (50-31)SANTAV SANTA ANA AVE 10 MODOC ST SAN LUCAS ST R S 2 592 32 18,944 11/10/2021 50 05/08/2009 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)STHEST ST HELENA ST 10 LA SALLE AVE MINGO AVE R A 1 1,689 22 37,158 11/03/2021 50 50-41 Poor (50-31) 10/03/2022 Page 6 of 12
Packet Page 322
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports:
Street List by PCI (High to Low)
Street ID Street Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC
ST
LNSLW Area (SF) PCI Date PCI Last M&R Date Last M&R Treatment PCI Range Condition TRINAV TRINITY AVE 40 TERRACE ST NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 1,473 36 53,028 08/25/2022 50 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31) ATHECT ATHENS CT 10 ANCON ST END R A 2 177 26 4,602 11/06/2021 49 50-41 Poor (50-31)CIELCT CIELITO CT 10 END ROUSCH AVE R A 2 224 27 6,668 11/10/2021 49 05/08/2009 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)EASTRD EAST FRONTAGE RD 10 LA SALLE AVE MILITARY AVE R A 2 1,699 43 73,057 11/12/2021 49 04/08/1987 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)HARCAV HARCOURT AV 30 PROSPECT ST 300' @ WIDTH CHANGE R S 2 300 32 9,600 08/25/2022 49 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)KENNST KENNETH ST 20 SONOMA AVE BROADWAY AVE R S 1 1,050 17 17,850 11/04/2021 49 05/06/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)LINDCT LINDBERGH CT 10 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 189 27 5,103 11/03/2021 49 50-41 Poor (50-31)MESCST MESCAL ST 10 PLUMAS AV 210''N-MESCAL ST R S 2 210 21 4,410 11/06/2021 49 11/27/2009 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)NAPAST NAPA ST 20 END LA SALLE AVE R S 2 160 20 3,200 11/03/2021 49 50-41 Poor (50-31)OLYMAV OLYMPIA AVE 30 WINTON ST NOCHE BUENA ST R O 2 920 37 34,040 11/10/2021 49 10/10/1998 AC OVERLAY 50-41 Poor (50-31)TRINAV TRINITY AVE 30 FREMONT BLVD TERRACE ST R S 2 1,357 37 50,209 08/25/2022 49 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)CROSST CROSS ST 10 ORD GROVE AVE MILITARY AVE R S 2 786 30 23,580 11/03/2021 48 50-41 Poor (50-31)ELMAVE ELM AVE 60 HARDING ST DARWIN ST R A 1 175 22 3,850 11/11/2021 48 04/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)JUARPL JUAREZ PL 10 HAVANA ST JUAREZ ST R A 2 167 32 5,344 11/03/2021 48 10/01/1990 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)LOWEPL LOWELL PL 10 KENNETH ST LOWELL ST R A 1 149 22 3,278 11/10/2021 48 50-41 Poor (50-31)LUXTST LUXTON ST 70 L PLACE SAN PABLO AVE R A 1 365 22 8,030 11/11/2021 48 05/13/2010 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)MAIDCT MAIDEN CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 134 26 5,189 11/06/2021 48 50-41 Poor (50-31)PLUMAV PLUMAS AV 10 HIGHLANDER DR NOCHE BUENA ST R A 2 1,316 37 48,692 11/10/2021 48 05/08/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)SIDDST SIDDAL ST 10 HILBY AVE HARCOURT AVE (N) R S 2 333 32 10,656 08/25/2022 48 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)ALYNOCLEMT ALLEY N/O CLEMENTINA 10 FREMONT BLVD WINTON ST O S 1 1,036 17 17,612 11/12/2021 47 05/01/1982 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)JPLACE J PLACE 10 LUXTON ST JUDSON ST R A 1 174 22 3,828 11/11/2021 47 50-41 Poor (50-31)MIRAAV MIRA MONTE AVE 10 WARING ST LUZERN ST R S 2 1,128 32 36,096 11/03/2021 47 05/05/1992 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)OLYMAV OLYMPIA AVE 02 END ROBERTS AVE R A 2 300 36 10,800 11/04/2021 47 50-41 Poor (50-31)ORDGAV ORD GROVE AV 60 BUCHANAN ST MISSION MEMORIAL C A 2 1,217 35 42,595 11/03/2021 47 05/08/2007 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)SHAWCT SHAWNEE CT 10 END SAN PABLO AVE R A 2 163 22 3,586 11/03/2021 47 50-41 Poor (50-31)WARIST WARING ST 80 SAN PABLO AVE LA SALLE AVE R A 2 662 23 15,226 11/03/2021 47 09/19/1989 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)AMADAV AMADOR AVE 30 FREMONT BLVD TERRACE ST R O 2 1,052 32 33,664 11/11/2021 46 01/19/1998 AC OVERLAY 50-41 Poor (50-31)BARBCT BARBARA CT 10 SIERRA AVE END R A 2 280 32 8,960 11/02/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)BIRCAV BIRCH AVE 10 FREMONT BLVD BAKER ST R O 2 1,041 31 32,271 11/04/2021 46 01/20/1998 AC OVERLAY 50-41 Poor (50-31)LISBCT LISBON CT 10 END LA SALLE AVE R A 2 243 26 9,636 11/03/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)MARECT MARIETTA CT 10 END MARIETTA ST R A 2 147 36 5,292 11/02/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)MAREST MARIETTA ST 10 MESCAL ST (N) MESCAL ST (S) R A 2 647 36 24,864 11/02/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)MAURCT MAURITINA CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 107 26 4,334 11/02/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)MONTRD MONTEREY RD 30 190' S/O BUNA LOOP 340' N/O NORMANDY RD A A 2 6,350 30 190,500 11/06/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)NOCHPL NOCHE BUENA PL 10 NOCHE BUENA ST KENNETH ST R A 2 159 22 3,498 11/10/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)PLUMAV PLUMAS AV 30 HIGHLAND ST MESCAL ST R S 2 616 21 12,936 11/10/2021 46 11/27/2009 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)SERACT SERAPE CT 10 SAN PABLO AVE END R A 2 178 27 4,806 11/03/2021 46 50-41 Poor (50-31)VELECT VELERTON CT 10 END YOSMITE ST R A 2 183 30 5,490 11/03/2021 46 05/08/2007 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)DARWST DARWIN ST 30 ST JAMES ST ST ALBANS ST R A 1 750 24 18,000 11/08/2021 45 50-41 Poor (50-31)ELMAVE ELM AVE 40 TERRACE ST NOCHE BUENA ST R S 2 1,489 32 47,648 08/25/2022 45 08/25/2022 BASE REPAIR DIGOUTS 50-41 Poor (50-31)JUDSST JUDSON ST 10 N. END BROADWAY AVE R A 2 325 22 8,381 11/04/2021 45 10/30/2013 SLURRY SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)KIMBAV KIMBALL AV 40 NOCHE BUENA ST BUENA ST C A 2 1,189 36 42,804 11/11/2021 45 05/14/1991 SINGLE CHIP SEAL 50-41 Poor (50-31)NAPAST NAPA ST 30 LA SALLE AVE ABRAHAM CT R S 2 615 32 19,680 11/03/2021 45 50-41 Poor (50-31)SEMICT SEMINOLE CT 10 END MESCAL ST R A 2 184 34 6,256 11/02/2021 45 50-41 Poor (50-31)SIERAV SIERRA AVE 10 YOSEMITE ST MESCAL ST R A 2 686 36 24,696 11/02/2021 45 50-41 Poor (50-31) 10/03/2022 Page 7 of 12
Packet Page 323
City of Seaside - 2022 PMP Update - Reference Reports: