Agenda packet — Seaside City Council, December 7, 2023 (part 1 of 3)

A G E N D A

CITY OF SEASIDE REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR 440 HARCOURT AVE (COUNCIL CHAMBER) AGENCY TO THE Thursday, December 7, 2023
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5:00 PM
___________________________________________________________________________________ NOTICE: The City Council will hold its public meetings in person, with options for viewing and listening virtually or telephonically, based on availability. ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________

1. To view this meeting: Please click on the following link to the City of Seaside YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofSeasideCalifornia

2. To view this meeting: Using the Zoom application on your smart phone, laptop, tablet or desktop and click on this link: https://ci-seaside-ca-us.zoom.us/j/81936832059 WEBINAR ID: 819 3683 2059

3. To listen by phone: Please call (669) 900-9128
Enter the meeting ID 819 3683 2059 when prompted. There is no participate code – press the pound sign # after the recording prompts you.

4. To make public comment, the following options are available:

Before the Meeting via Email: Written comments can be emailed to [email protected] Include the following subject line: “Public Comment Item #___” (insert the agenda item number relevant to your comment). Written comments must be received by 2:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting.

During the Meeting via Oral Comments: When the Chair calls for public comment, members of the public participating in person and wishing to address the City Council may approach the podium when the Chair calls for public comment.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL – ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM
Ian N. Oglesby
David R. Pacheco
Alexis Garcia-Arrazola
Rita Burks
Alex Miller
Mayor/Chair
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair
Council/Agency Member
Council/Agency Member
Council/Agency Member

3. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. REVIEW OF AGENDA
Packet Page 1
City Council REGULAR Meeting December 7, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 2 If there are any items that arose after the 72-hour posting deadline, this is the point in the meeting where a vote may be taken to add the item to the agenda. (A 2/3-majority vote is required).

5. PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on matters within the jurisdiction of the City of Seaside, but not on this agenda, may do so during the Public Comment period for up to three (3) minutes. Public Comments for "Presentations" on this agenda are also taken at this time; comments on specific agenda items are heard under that item. For the public record, please state your name.

6. CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 et seq., the City Council and Successor Agency to Redevelopment Agency may adjourn to a Closed Session to consider specific matters dealing with litigation, certain personnel matters, property negotiations or to confer with the City Attorney. Public comments on these items are taken after being read by the City Attorney. For the public record, please state your name.

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B) - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Consultation with: Don Freeman, Attorney at Law
B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957
Title: City Attorney
C. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957
Title: City Manager

7. PUBLIC AGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
This is a time specifically set aside for representatives of public agencies to make brief comments of general interest to the City Council and the community.

8. PRESENTATIONS
A. UPCOMING CITYWIDE EVENTS AND COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS (RECREATION DIRECTOR DAN MEEWIS)
B. 2023 SEASIDE MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN (PUBLIC

WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER NISHA PATEL)
C. MONTEREY PENINSULA CORPS OF THE SALVATION ARMY 2023

ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES UPDATES (MAJOR JOHN BENNETT)
Packet Page 2
City Council REGULAR Meeting December 7, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 3 D. MONTEREY ONE WATER WEIGHTED VOTE FORMULA POTENTIAL
CHANGES (PAUL A. SCIUTO, GENERAL MANAGER)
E. TINY HOMES DEMONSTRATION (GARY TOET, DESIGNER)

9. CONSENT AGENDA
A. APPROVE MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 14 AND 16, 2023
RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes as presented in the agenda packet.

B. APPROVE AND FILE CITY CHECKS
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and file the accounts payable and wired payments made during the period of September 30, 2023 through November 10, 2023, including the payroll and benefits checks, direct deposits, and wired payments related to the pay period ending September 29, 2023, October 13, 2023 and October 27, 2023. Total Accounts Payable and Payroll for the above referenced period is $6,737,153.95.

C. APPROVE AND FILE SUCCESSOR AGENCY CHECKS
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and file the accounts payable and wired payments made during the period of September 30, 2023 through November 10, 2023, including the payroll and benefits checks, direct deposits and wired payments related to the pay period ending September 29, 2023, October 13, 2023 and October 27, 2023. Total Accounts Payable and Payroll for the above referenced period is $2,814.06.

D. APPROVE A MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST FROM

SEASIDE AQUATIC CLUB
RECOMMENDATION: Approve a request from Seaside Aquatic Club for a donation of $3,000.00 from the Mayor's Youth Fund to help cover the costs associated with the operations of the team.

E. APPROVE A FEE WAIVER REQUEST FROM ACTION COUNCIL - BUILDING

HEALTHY COMMUNITIES FOR THE USE OF THE LAGUNA GRANDE HALL AND KITCHEN FOR THEIR YOUTH SUMMIT ON DECEMBER 16, 2023.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve the fee waiver request from Action Council - Building Healthy Communities for the use of the Laguna Grande Hall and Kitchen to hold their Youth Summit in the amount of $424.50, the organization to provide the City with the non-refundable portion of the deposit of $98.25.

F. APPROVE A PROCLAMATION HONORING DECEMBER 7 AS PEARL

HARBOR REMEMBRANCE DAY
RECOMMENDATION: Approve a proclamation honoring December 7, 2023, as Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day in the City of Seaside.

Packet Page 3
City Council REGULAR Meeting December 7, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 4 G. APPROVE A PROCLAMATION COMMEMORATING THE ADOPTING OF THE

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, AND DECLARING
DECEMBER 10 AS HUMAN RIGHTS DAY
RECOMMENDATION: Approve a proclamation commemorating the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations General Assembly, and declaring December 10, 2023, as Human Rights Day in the City of Seaside.

H. REVIEW AND TAKE ACTION ON TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE

RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE TRAFFIC CALMING APPLICATION

FOR SAN PABLO AVENUE BETWEEN MESCAL STREET AND GENERAL JIM

MOORE BOULEVARD
RECOMMENDATION: Approve design for traffic calming on San Pablo Avenue from Mescal Street to General Jim Moore Boulevard.

I. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PARAMETRIX INC. FOR THE SAN PABLO TRAFFIC

CALMING WORK PLAN AND DESIGN FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $81,610.00
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Parametrix Inc. for the San Pablo Traffic Calming Work Plan and Design for an amount not to exceed $81,610.00.

J. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL PROGRAM

COMPLIANCE REPORT IN SUPPORT OF PROJECTS FUNDED BY MEASURE

X AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE REPORT TO THE

TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving the annual compliance report in support of projects funded by Measure X and authorizing staff to submit the Report to the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) in order for the City to continue receiving the revenue generated from Measure X funds.

K. ADOPT A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE ANNUAL CITY COUNCIL OUTSIDE ASSIGNMENTS FOR JANUARY 1, 2023 TO DECEMBER 31, 2023 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution modifying the City Council outside agency assignments to appoint Mayor Oglesby as the primary representative for the Monterey County Mosquito Abatement District, and Mayor Pro Tem Pacheco as the alternate representative for the same; and appoint Council Member GarciaArrazola as the primary representative for ReGen Monterey, and Council Member Miller as the alternate representative for the same.

L. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS & ASSOCIATES

FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION
SERVICES FOR THE FY 2021/2022 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $61,720.00.

Packet Page 4
City Council REGULAR Meeting December 7, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 5 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing an amendment to the professional services agreement with Harris & Associates for additional construction management and inspection services for the FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation Project for an amount not to exceed $61,720.00.

10. PUBLIC HEARING
A. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA-23-02: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING THE 6TH CYCLE (2023- 2031) DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT (EXEMPT FROM CEQA)
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment (GPA) 23-02 and adopting the City of Seaside 6th Cycle (2023-2031) Draft Housing Element.

11. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDED FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PHASE 3 OF THE ENCLAVE, AND GRANT DEEDS TO SHEA HOMES, L.P.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving the Enclave Phase 3 Amended Final Subdivision Map, and grant deeds to Shea Homes, L.P.

B. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

CONTRACT WITH CALIFORNIA PREMIER RESTORATION TO INCLUDE THE

RETRIEVAL OF UNATTENDED SHOPPING CARTS IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
RECOMMENDATION: Amend the existing contract with California Premier Restoration (CPR), a company that specializes in biohazard cleanup, to include retrieval of unattended shopping carts that could contain hazardous materials in public right of way until the funding is expended, and a new contract is required.

12. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
A. NEW COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
B. FOLLOW UP ON PREVIOUS REQUESTS

1. Promotional plans for completed projects (Garcia-Arrazola)

2. Emergency/Incident Communications Plan (Garcia-Arrazola/Oglesby)

13. CITY ATTORNEY, CITY MANAGER, CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR

COMMENTS AND REPORTS ON COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
This is a time specifically set aside for members of the City Council, the City Manager and City Attorney to make brief comments of general interest to the community and report on committee assignments.

14. CLOSED SESSION
Packet Page 5
City Council REGULAR Meeting December 7, 2023 5:00 PM Agenda Page 6 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 et seq., the City Council and Successor Agency to Redevelopment Agency may adjourn to a Closed Session to consider specific matters dealing with litigation, certain personnel matters, property negotiations or to confer with the City Attorney. Public comments on these items are taken after being read by the City Attorney. For the public record, please state your name.

A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
Property: The Property Commonly Referred to As Campus Town (Property bounded by Highway 1/1st Avenue, 7th Avenue, Lightfighter/Colonel Durham Street, and Gigling)
Agency Negotiation: City Manager, et al.

Negotiating Parties: Danny Bakewell, Jr. and KB Bakewell, Inc., et al.

Under Negotiation: Purchase and Sale Agreement Terms
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 - EXISTING LITIGATION
Monterey County Superior Court
Case No: 23PR000490
Clyde and Claudia Marie Trust
C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.9
Potential Litigation (2 MATTERS)

15. ADJOURNMENT
Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting:

December 21, 2023
5:00 PM
The City of Seaside is committed to providing accessible facilities and accommodating people with disabilities in all of its services programs and activities. If special considerations are needed by any person to fully participate in this meeting, contact the City Clerk at 899-6707 no fewer than two business days prior to the meeting to allow reasonable arrangements. Agendas are posted at:
http://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/129/City-Council-Committee-Agendas Agenda-related writings or documents provided during public meetings are available for public inspection during the meeting or from the office of the City Clerk. This agenda is posted in compliance with California Governor Newsom's Executive Orders N-29-20 and N-33-20.

Packet Page 6

DRAFT MINUTES

CITY OF SEASIDE SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR 440 HARCOURT AVE
AGENCY TO THE Tuesday, November 14, 2023
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor/Chair Oglesby called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL – ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM
PRESENT: Burks, Garcia-Arrazola, Oglesby, Pacheco, Miller ABSENT: None

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Assistant City Manager Manny Gonzalez led the pledge.

4. PUBLIC COMMENT
None.

5. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY FINANCE DIRECTOR TO ADJUST THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 BUDGET IN AN AMOUNT OF $59,000 FOR LOBBYIST SERVICES
Finance Director Victor Damiani provided and overview of the request and advised the Council that $25,000.00 was budgeted for fiscal year 2023-2024 for lobbyist services.

At the September 21 meeting, the agenda item erroneously omitted a required budget adjustment to increase the appropriation for lobbyist services. The is asked to authorize an increase to the fiscal year 2023-2024 appropriation for lobbyist services by $59,000.00
There were no comments from the public.

On motion by Council/Agency Member Miller and second by Council/Agency Member Garcia-Arrazola, and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency moved to adopt a resolution authorizing the adjustment to the fiscal year 2023-2024 budget in the amount f $59,000.00 for lobbyist services.

RESULT: 5-0-0-0
AYES: BURKS, GARCIA-ARRAZOLA, MILLER, OGLESBY, PACHECO
Packet Page 7
Tuesday, November 14, 2023 City Council SPECIAL Meeting Page 2 NOES: NONE
ASBSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ACTION: ADOPTED

6. CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Sheri Damon read the closed session items and indicated that item 6B would not be discussed due to the City Manager’s absence. - Meet in closed session.

A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957:

This item was pulled from Closed Session items.

B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957:

Public Employee: City Attorney

7. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:02 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
_________________________ _________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
Packet Page 8

DRAFT MINUTES

CITY OF SEASIDE REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR 440 HARCOURT AVE
AGENCY TO THE Thursday, November 16, 2023
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor/Chair Oglesby called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL – ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM
PRESENT: Burks, Garcia-Arrazola, Miller, Oglesby, Pacheco ABSENT: None

3. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
A moment of silence was held for invocation. Council/Agency Member Miller led the pledge.

4. REVIEW OF AGENDA
City Manager Fontes advised the Council that item 9B should be pulled and moved to future date in early 2024.

5. PUBLIC COMMENT
Chandler Rolland, Peter Kiser

6. PUBLIC AGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
None.

7. PRESENTATIONS
A. UPCOMING CITYWIDE EVENTS & COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
(RECREATION DIRECTOR DAN MEEWIS)
Recreation Director Dan Meewis provided a presentation and reviewed the following upcoming events and responded to questions from the Council:
• Seaside Certified Farmers Market – Closed on November 16 due to inclement weather.
• Inclement weather notice – sand bag filling station at Fire Department, residents can take up to 10 bags per household, contact Public Works at 831-899-6835 or [email protected] for more information.
• Winter Spring Activity Guide is now online at bit.ly/seasideag; registration opens 12/4 for residents, 12/6 for non-residents
• Seaside Fire Department Toy Drive, accepting unwrapped donations until December Packet Page 9
Thursday, November 16, 2023 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 2 20 • Thanksgiving Camps, November 20-22, 7:45-6pm, bit.ly/SeasideRecTrac • Blue Zones, Purpose Workshop, November 29, 5:30-7:30pm, Oldemeyer Center • The Fall Art Competition, 11/7-1/4/24, reception on 11/17 at 7pm • Movies in the Park, Super Mario Bros., 11/17 at 6pm –new location! Oldemeyer Center due to inclement weather.
• Cereal with Santa, December 3, 9-11a.m., Oldemeyer Center • Winter Wonderland, November 8 (corrected date), 6-9pm, City Hall Lawn • Community Holiday Luncheon, December 16, 12:00 p.m. Oldemeyer Center • Caltrans SR218 ADA Compliant Pedestrian Access Project (updates provided) • CalFresh Food, to enrollment assistance available at 831-899-6851 or 831-899-6850 • Complimentary Childcare at City Council meetings, call 831-899-6800 48 hours in advance
• Family & Community Support Program, [email protected], 831-899-6852 • Friends of Seaside Parks Association Clean Up – November 18 (Durant), November 25 (Capra), December 2 (Farallones), December 9 (Lincoln-Cunningham), December 16 (Havana-Soliz), December 23 (Mescal Neil), December 30 (Beta Park) Follow us on social media at facebook.com/SeasideCA; Instagram @cityofseaside; X @City_of_Seaside
B. FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL RESULTS (FINANCE DIRECTOR, VICTOR

DAMIANI)
Finance Director Victor Damiani provided the presentation and provided a budget recap for fiscal year 2023-2024, provided the budget highlights:
• Continue to re-staff the City’s workforce. Five new positions were approved while six other positions were frozen so that the position control list showed a net reduction of one position.
• 4% Cost of living adjustments were provided to City staff • Continue expanded services to the community; appropriate $500K for grants to support community non-profits for a fourth year running and $600k for Family and Community Support.
• Initiate hot spot street repair program with a first year budget of $614k. • General Fund funding for CIP; $5.6M including government buildings, parks, water infrastructure, and storm water.

Director Damiani also reviewed the quarter 1 general fund revenues, expenditures, general fund net results, budget outlook, long term forecast, headwinds and anticipated upcoming actions that include the fiscal year 2022-2023 final audit report (January), proposed budget calendar (January), and the mid-year review (March).

C. VACCINE UPDATE (FIRE CHIEF, MARY GUTIERREZ)
Fire Chief Gutierrez provided a presentation on the status of COVID-19 vaccinations, how to obtain free COVID tests and an overview of the Bridge Access Program for adults whose insurance does not cover all COVID-19 vaccine costs.

Packet Page 10
Thursday, November 16, 2023 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 3 Search Vaccines.gov, Text your ZIP code to 438829, Or call 1-800-232-0233.

For free COVID test visit: www.covid.gov
For information regarding the Bridge Access Program visit:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/bridge/index.html (program ends December 31, 2024)

8. CONSENT AGENDA
Item 8E was pulled by Mayor/Chair Oglesby.

There were no comments from the public.

On motion by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Pacheco and second by Council/Agency Member Garcia-Arrazola, and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency moved to approve the Consent Agenda, except for item 8E.

RESULT: 5-0-0-0
AYES: BURKS, GARCIA-ARRAZOLA, MILLER, OGLESBY, PACHECO
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
A. APPROVE AND FILE CITY CHECKS
ACTION: APPROVED & FILED
B. APPROVE AND FILE SUCCESSOR AGENCY CHECKS
ACTION: APPROVED & FILED
C. ACCEPT AND FILE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2023.

ACTION: ACCEPTED & FILED
D. ACCEPT AND FILE THE CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT FOR THE CITY

OF SEASIDE AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT

AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE FOR THE QUARTER ENDING
SEPTEMBER 30, 2023
ACTION: ACCEPTED & FILED
E. APPROVE MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST FROM

SEASIDE HIGH SCHOOL WOOD SHOP PROGRAM
PUBLIC COMMENT: David Fallons, Bobby Maxwell
Packet Page 11
Thursday, November 16, 2023 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 4 On motion by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Pacheco and second by Council/Agency Member Garcia-Arrazola, and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency moved to approve the Mayor’s Youth Fund contribution request from Seaside High School Wood Shop Program.

RESULT: 5-0-0-0
AYES: BURKS, GARCIA-ARRAZOLA, MILLER, OGLESBY, PACHECO
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ACTION: APPROVED
F. APPROVE A FEE WAIVER FROM THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MONTEREY

COUNTY FOR THE USE OF THE LAGUNA GRANDE HALL AND KITCHEN FOR THE 2024 MARTI MULFORD YOUTH ARTS EXHIBIT ON JANUARY 19, 2024
ACTION: APPROVED
G. AUTHORIZATION TO DISPOSE OF SURPLUS CITY VEHICLES AND

EQUIPMENT
ACTION: APPROVED
H. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT WITH SEASIDE

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (SCSD) FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF

COSTS TO COMPLETE THE SUTTER STREET SEWER RELOCATION

PROJECT
ACTION: ADOPTED
I. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
ACTION: APPROVED

9. PUBLIC HEARING
A. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA-23-02: ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING ORDINANCE) TO ADD CHAPTER 17.13 IMPLEMENTING SENATE BILL 9 (DUPLEXES AND PARCEL MAPS FOR URBAN LOT SPLITS). THE AMENDMENT IS NOT A PROJECT UNDER THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65852.21(j) AND 66411.7(n) (SECOND

READING)
Economic Development and Community Planning Manager, Andrew Myrick reviewed the proposed ordinance that allows for ministerial approval (“by right”) for at least two dwelling units on a single-family zoned parcel; ministerial approval of qualifying Packet Page 12
Thursday, November 16, 2023 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 5 urban lot splits; and two units allowed per lot.

An Urgency Ordinance was adopted by the City Council on December 16, 2021, and was later extended to December 12, 2023.

Adoption of the ordinance would result in addeding Chapter 17.13 to the Zoning Ordinance, and ZOA-23-02 would make language from the Urgency Ordinance permanent.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: Peter Kaiser
On motion by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Pacheco and second by Council/Agency Member Garcia-Arrazola, and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency moved to adopt an ordinance amending title 17 to add chapter 17.13 implementing senate bill 9.

RESULT: 5-0-0-0
AYES: BURKS, GARCIA-ARRAZOLA, MILLER, OGLESBY, PACHECO
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ACTION: ADOPTED
B. AMEND SEASIDE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.32 FIREWORKS; ADDING SECTION 8.32.211 - CURFEW FOR USE OF SAFE AND SANE

FIREWORKS (FIRST READING, ROLL CALL VOTE)
This item was pulled from the agenda and will rescheduled for early 2024.

10. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. HOT SPOT PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT UPDATE
Assistant Public Works Director Carolyn Burks, and consultant, Joe Ririe, Pavement Engineering Inc. provided an overview of the pavement management program, the 3-pronged pavement management plan, and the project background and description.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Sylvia
This item was for information only.

B. FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROGRAM INCLEMENT WEATHER UPDATE
Recreation Director Dan Meewis provided an overview of the Inclement Weather Plan and informed that Council that there have been 49 requests for hotel Packet Page 13
Thursday, November 16, 2023 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 6 vouchers: 17 vouchers were distributed to individuals and families, and the remaining 32 household were guided to shelters.

The Family & Community Support Program has engaged in homeless outreach efforts including but not limited to providing hot meals, care kits, and hygiene Items; Provided case management to link to other City and County resources, coordinated with local shelters (Case De Noche Buena, Salvation Army, Safe Place, I-Help, Natividad, Hamilton and China Town Navigation Center.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Sylvia
This item was for information only.

C. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE 2024 LEGISLATIVE

PLATFORM
City Manager Fontes, Public Works Director/City Engineer Nisha Patel, and consultant John Arriaga, JEA & Associates provided the presentation reviewing the 2024 Legislative Platform and responded to questions from the Council.

The purpose of the City of Seaside Legislative Platform is to unify the city's voice and to proactively frame sponsorship, support, and advocacy regarding critical legislative and regulatory priorities.

The Legislative Platform is a summary of the priorities of the City Council and Executive Staff and sets the basis for advocacy efforts with the Executive and Legislative branches of the U.S. Government and the State of California regarding legislation and regulation.

There were no comments from the public.

The Council directed staff to bring back in 2024 for adoption.

11. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
A. NEW COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS

1. Promotional plans for completed projects (Garcia-Arrazola)

2. Emergency/Incident Communications Plan (Garcia-Arrazola/Oglesby) B. FOLLOW UP ON PREVIOUS REQUESTS
City Manager Fontes provided follow up on Public Works coordination with Monterey County Libraries for a curbside book drop off box, and that Chief Building Official Romeo Herrera is working on the RV parking issues and will come back with some suggestions at a future meeting, the Canadian Geese report from Foster City is expected in early 2024.

Packet Page 14
Thursday, November 16, 2023 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 7

12. CITY ATTORNEY, CITY MANAGER, CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR COMMENTS

AND REPORTS ON COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
Reports provided.

13. CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Sheri Damon read the closed session and did not anticipate a report.

There were no comments from the public.

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 - EXISTING LITIGATION
Monterey County Superior Court
Case Number: 23PR000490
Case Name: In Re Clyde and Claudia Marie Trust (dated September 20, 2011) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.9
Potential Litigation (2 Matters)

14. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
_________________________ _________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
Packet Page 15

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.B.

TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Loreene Bermudez-Onate, Accountant II
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE AND FILE CITY CHECKS

RECOMMENDATION
Approve and file the accounts payable and wired payments made during the period of September 30, 2023 through November 10, 2023, including the payroll and benefits checks, direct deposits, and wired payments related to the pay period ending September 29, 2023, October 13, 2023 and October 27, 2023. Total Accounts Payable and Payroll for the above referenced period is $6,737,153.95.

BACKGROUND
In accordance with Government Code Section 37208, at each City Council meeting, the Council is provided a listing of the payroll and general checks issued since the last report so that the checks can be inspected and confirmed. Each purchase has been reviewed and approved by the department making the purchase at the time of procurement. The invoices have been reviewed by the Finance Department prior to payment to ensure that they conform to the approved budget.

Therefore, in accordance with Government Code Section 37208, the above referenced and linked list of checks conforms to the approved budget and has been paid. These checks are submitted to the City Council for inspection and confirmation.

A description of the checks and wires exceeding $10,000.00 are as follows:
• $18,159.35 to Action Council of Monterey County for Prof. services for the Community Social Services Grant for the periods of July-September 2023. • $15,065.36 to Advexure LLC for Fire Department equipment purchase: drone & accessories upgrade.
• $10,570.00 to Bay View Community de LLC for United Way rental assistance for Packet Page 16

Item No. 9.B. Page 2 of 5
1 tenant for the periods of September 2023-January 2024. • $20,532.50 to Bay View Community de LLC for United Way rental assistance for 2 tenants for the periods of August-December 2023 & February-December 2023. • $19,120.75 to Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC for Prof. plan review services for FYE 2024 facilities condition assessments for the period of June 2023.
• $12,787.50 to Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP for Prof. legal services to assist the City Attorney for the periods of August & September 2023. • $43,118.44 to California-American Water for Water consumption for multiple City of Seaside service addresses. Billing period of 8/19/23-9/22/23. Service addresses include city buildings, parks, fire hydrants, irrigation stations, and city affordable housing.
• $44,753.16 to California-American Water for Water consumption for multiple City of Seaside service addresses. Billing period of 9/22/23-10/24/23. Service addresses include city buildings, parks, fire hydrants, irrigation stations, and city affordable housing.
• $25,000.00 to Community Partnership for Youth for Community social services grant reimbursement request for the period October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023.
• $10,729.50 to Ellis Investigations Law Corporation for Prof. investigative services for the period of October 2023.
• $15,458.83 to Enterprise FM Trust for monthly payments for (16) leased City vehicles for the period of October 2023.
• $10,000.00 to La Sirenita Tree Service for Professional tree services including (3) tree trims & (1) tree removal.
• $11,012.00 to Granicus, LLC for Software for Economic Development for the period of 7/28/2023 - 7/27/2024.
• $205,032.98 to Granite Rock Company for Construction services for Cutino Park Improvement Part 2, Phase 1 through August 31, 2023.
• $150,286.51 to Granite Rock Company for Construction services for Cutino Park Improvement Part 2, Phase 1 through September 30, 2023. • $24,157.95 to Harris & Associates, Inc. for Professional services for the 2023 Hot Spot Repair project through September 30, 2023.
• $11,895.00 to Hope Services for Maintenance services for the period of September 2023.
• $21,816.51 to Huntington Public Capital Corp. for quarterly lease contract payment for Vactor and Patch Trucks for the period of 11/8/23-2/7/24. • $10,677.08 to Huntington Public Capital Corp. for Lease contract payment for the Energy Project at City Hall, City Library, and Fire Department locations. • $70,322.32 to Kraemer Engineering Inc. for Construction services for the Fernando Park Improvements project through September 30, 2023. • $12,641.15 to Kutak Rock LLP for Professional legal services for the months of June & August 2023.
• $144,260.44 to Marina Coast Water District for Recycled water meter services for Packet Page 17

Item No. 9.B. Page 3 of 5
the period of 9/1/23-9/30/23.
• $38,205.09 to Monterey Co. Convention & Visitor's Bureau for TID (Tourism Improvement District) remittance for the reporting period of August 2023 for the 13 Seaside motels/hotels.
• $25,863.00 to Monterey Co. Convention & Visitor's Bureau for Jurisdiction Improvement Investment for FY 2023-24 Quarter 2.
• $304,712.07 to Monterey Peninsula Engineering for Construction services for the City Hall and Parking Lot Repave project through September 30, 2023. • $29,143.47 to Monterey Peninsula Water Mgmt District for Seaside Basin Watermaster services for the periods of May-September 2023. • $22,504.00 to Monterey Regional Waste Mgmt Dist. for Franchise Payment from Green Waste for FY 2022-23 remaining balance.
• $23,147.35 to Municipal Emergency Services, Inc. for the purchase of (6) sets of turnout gear for the new Fire Department personnel.
• $50,000.00 to Palenke Arts for Organizational support for the Arts Center for FY 2022-23 remaining balance.
• $10,675.00 to Pavement Engineering, Inc. for Professional services for the 2023 Hot Spot Repair project & Pavement Rehab Project Phase 5 services through September 30, 2023.
• $11,385.00 to Paxton Associates for Professional administrative services for the Watermaster Plan project for the periods of July 26-September 25, 2023. • $54,929.72 to PG&E for Collective accts for streetlights, highway lighting, park lights and city office buildings. Service for the statement period of September 2023.
• $53,426.75 to PG&E for Collective accts for streetlights, highway lighting, park lights and city office buildings. Service for the statement period of October 2023. • $69,673.00 to Premo Roofing Company for Services for the Fire Station No. 1 reroof project. • $38,232.50 to RRM Design Group for Professional architectural and engineering services for the Fire Station 2 project through August 30, 2023. • $60,418.63 to RRM Design Group for Professional architectural and engineering services for the Fire Station 2 project through September 2023. • $12,182.57 to Gateway Lodge for United Way rental assistance for 1 tenant for the periods of: August-December 2023.
• $28,030.12 to Schaaf & Wheeler, Consulting Civil Engineers for Professional engineering services for staff support, MCWD Intertie Design, and Storm Drain Master Plan Project through September 2023.
• $10,833.81 to Seaview Affordable Communities, L.P. for United Way rental assistance for 2 tenants for the periods of: January-December 2023 & October 2023.
• $10,304.00 to SPCA Monterey County for Animal care services for Police Department for the period of September 2023.
• $14,179.62 to Sturdy Oil Company for 1,990 gallons of regular gas (ethanol) and 688 gallons of clear diesel delivered to the public works department on 9/13/23.

Packet Page 18

Item No. 9.B. Page 4 of 5
• $13,866.26 to Sturdy Oil Company for 2,000 gallons of regular gas (ethanol) and 604 gallons of clear diesel delivered to the public works department on 9/27/23. • $12,500.00 to Sun Street Centers for Community Social Services grant reimbursement request for the periods of 10/1/23-12/31/23. • $25,000.00 to Sun Street Centers for Community Social Services grant reimbursement request for the periods of 7/1/23-9/30/23 & 10/1/23-12/31/23. • $20,770.00 to The Sohagi Law Group for Professional legal services for Petrovich Development & general land use for the periods of August & September 2023. • $99,708.66 to U.S. Bank St. Paul for City of Seaside joint powers financing authority lease revenue bonds (2006 Bayonet and Blackhorse Golf Course Project).
• $55,400.65 to U.S. Bank-Calcard for City of Seaside purchase card transactions for the billing period of September 2023.
• $22,743.27 to Wallace Group for August 2023 invoices for: Cutino & Ellis Parks Improvement services (Part 2, Phase 1); Lincoln Cunningham Basketball Court Improvement project services; Del Monte LID project services. • $55,494.37 to Wallace Group for Services for the Sewer System Management Plan Update project for the periods of April-September 2023. September 2023 invoices for: Cutino & Ellis Parks Improvement services (Part 2, Phase 1); Lincoln Cunningham Basketball Court Improvement project services; Ord Terrace Elementary School Crossing project services; Fernando Park Improvements; Campus Town Water Augmentation; SCSD Fog Program Development/Training. • $11,531.06 to Whitson Engineers for Services for the Police Department parking lot improvement project for the period of August 2023.
• $26,816.13 to Whitson Engineers for September 2023 invoices for: Professional services for Cutino Park Improvements; Lincoln-Cunningham & Havanna-Soliz Parks Review; Yosemite/San Pablo Storm Drain project; Fernando Park Playground Improvements.

The Net Payroll and Payroll benefits total was $3,088,962.26.

The remaining checks, totaling $1,529,118.26, include payments to vendors for operating expenditures.

The check report is available on the City's website here:
https://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/194/Check-Draft-Register

FISCAL IMPACT
There are no additional fiscal impacts.

ATTACHMENTS
Packet Page 19

Item No. 9.B. Page 5 of 5
None
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 20

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.C.

TO: Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seaside FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Loreene Bermudez-Onate, Accountant II
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE AND FILE SUCCESSOR AGENCY CHECKS

RECOMMENDATION
Approve and file the accounts payable and wired payments made during the period of September 30, 2023 through November 10, 2023, including the payroll and benefits checks, direct deposits and wired payments related to the pay period ending September 29, 2023, October 13, 2023 and October 27, 2023. Total Accounts Payable and Payroll for the above referenced period is $2,814.06.

BACKGROUND
In accordance with Government Code Section 37208, at each City Council meeting the Council is provided a listing of the payroll and general checks issued since the last report so that it can inspect and confirm these checks. Each purchase has been reviewed and approved by the department making the purchase at the time of procurement. The invoice has been reviewed by the Finance Department prior to payment to ensure that it conforms to the approved budget.

Therefore, in accordance with Government Code Section 37208, the above referenced, and linked list of checks conforms to the approved budget and has been paid. These checks are submitted to the City Council for inspection and confirmation.

A description of the checks and wires exceeding $10,000 are as follows:
• No checks exceeded $10,000.

The Checks report is available on the City's website here:
https://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/194/Check-Draft-Register
Packet Page 21

Item No. 9.C. Page 2 of 2

FISCAL IMPACT
There are no additional fiscal impacts.

ATTACHMENTS
None
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 22

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.D.

TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Dan Meewis, Recreation Director
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE A MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST

FROM SEASIDE AQUATIC CLUB

RECOMMENDATION
Approve a request from Seaside Aquatic Club for a donation of $3,000.00 from the Mayor's Youth Fund to help cover the costs associated with the operations of the team.

BACKGROUND
The Seaside Aquatic Club is requesting a donation of $3,000.00 from the Mayor's Youth Fund to help cover the costs associated with the swim team, which include pool rental fees, pool maintenance, supply costs, Red Cross registration fees, and costs for staff.

Funds are also established to help subsidize low-income swimmers from the Seaside High School Swim Team who are interested in swimming year round.

The Seaside Aquatic Club participates in the annual Coastal Clean-up Day held each year in Monterey County and they also recycle soda cans and plastic materials as a fundraiser for the team. The Seaside Dolphins hold three major fund raisers each year to help support the team and to keep fees affordable.

Based on the information provided in the application, the request meets the criteria for the Mayor's Youth Fund Policy. They received their last donation at the November 03, 2022 City Council Meeting. They submitted their 2022 Mayor's Youth Fund Closing report within the 60 day time frame.

FISCAL IMPACT
This request would be funded by a donation from the Green Waste Recovery's donation to the Mayor's Youth Fund. The current balance is the Mayor's Youth Fund account Packet Page 23

Item No. 9.D. Page 2 of 2
(601-2106) is $60,107.02. If the City Council approves this request, the balance will decrease to $57,107.02. This is for fiscal year 2023/24.

In the event that all of the funds in the Mayor's Youth Fund become exhausted, staff will keep a file of all applications. Once Green Waste issues the next round of funding, all applications on file will be processed at the next available City Council meeting.

ATTACHMENTS

1. MYF Seaside Aquatic Club - The Dolphins 2023

2. W-9 - Seaside Aquatic Club 2023
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 24
Packet Page 25
Packet Page 26
Packet Page 27
Packet Page 28
Packet Page 29
Packet Page 30
Packet Page 31

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.E.

TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Dan Meewis, Recreation Director
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE A FEE WAIVER REQUEST FROM ACTION COUNCIL -

BUILDING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES FOR THE USE OF THE

LAGUNA GRANDE HALL AND KITCHEN FOR THEIR YOUTH
SUMMIT ON DECEMBER 16, 2023.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the fee waiver request from Action Council - Building Healthy Communities for the use of the Laguna Grande Hall and Kitchen to hold their Youth Summit in the amount of $424.50, the organization to provide the City with the non-refundable portion of the deposit of $98.25.

BACKGROUND
The Action Council Building Healthy Communities is requesting a fee waiver for the use of Laguna Grande Hall and kitchen for their Youth Summit, which will be held on December 16, 2023. Their Seaside Rising Youth Leadership Academy is an eight-week program. The year end youth summit is to honor the students that are receiving a CSUN Cares for Students Community Social Services Grant. The vast majority of these students become academic achievers for the first time as a result of this program. Each participant is recognized with a certificate from local elected officials, including the Mayor.

Staff recommends that the fees be waived for the rental cost of the facility and that the organization pay only the non-refundable portion of the deposit of $98.25 to go towards the building maintenance fund.

FISCAL IMPACT
Should the City Council approve the full fee waiver request, the approximate fiscal Packet Page 32

Item No. 9.E. Page 2 of 2
impact is as follows:

Laguna Grande Hall & Kitchen Rental Fee 6 Hours @
$56.25
$337.50
Liability Insurance $ 87.00
Non-Refundable Deposit $ 98.25
TOTAL $522.75
Should the City Council approve the request with the staff recommendation to waive all rental fees but require payment for the non-refundable deposit only. The fiscal impact is $424.50

ATTACHMENTS

1. Fee Waiver Request - Action Council - Building Healthy Communities - Youth Summit 2023

2. 501(c)(3) Information - Action Council - Building Healthy Communities Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 33
Packet Page 34
Packet Page 35
Packet Page 36
Packet Page 37
Packet Page 38
Packet Page 39
Packet Page 40
Packet Page 41
Packet Page 42
Packet Page 43
Packet Page 44
Packet Page 45
Packet Page 46

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.F.

TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Dominique Davis, City Clerk
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE A PROCLAMATION HONORING DECEMBER 7 AS

PEARL HARBOR REMEMBRANCE DAY

RECOMMENDATION
Approve a proclamation honoring December 7, 2023, as Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day in the City of Seaside.

BACKGROUND
On December 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy attacked the United States naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. This unprovoked attack resulted in the deaths of 2,403 Americans and the wounding of over 1,178 others. The attack on Pearl Harbor brought the United States into World War II.

In recognition of this solemn day, the City of Seaside will be issuing a proclamation honoring December 7 as Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day. This proclamation will serve as a reminder to all residents of the sacrifices made by the brave men and women who served during World War II.

The attack on Pearl Harbor was a pivotal moment in American history. It was a day of infamy that forever changed the course of our nation. The attack also served as a wake-up call to the American people, who had been isolationists for many years.

In the wake of the attack, the United States mobilized for war. Millions of Americans joined the military, and the country's factories were converted to produce war equipment. The United States also forged alliances with other countries that were fighting against the Axis powers.

The war in the Pacific was long and bloody, but the United States and its allies Packet Page 47

Item No. 9.F. Page 2 of 2
eventually prevailed. The defeat of Japan marked the end of World War II and the beginning of a new era for the world.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day Proclamation
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 48
City of Seaside

PROCLAMATION
Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day
December 7, 2023
WHEREAS, December 7, 2023, marks the 82nd anniversary of the attack on the Pearl Harbor American Army and Naval Base in Hawaii; and
WHEREAS, on this day, we remember the 2,403 Americans who lost their lives and the 1,178 others who were wounded; and
WHEREAS, we honor the memories of the 2,403 service members and civilians whose lives were cut short on that tragic December morning; and
WHEREAS, we reflect on the resilience of America’s Armed Forces, who withstood the attack and built the most capable fighting force the world has ever known; and WHEREAS, Over 800,000 Californians served in the United States Armed Forces during the attack on Pearl Harbor; and
WHEREAS, In August 1940, Fort Ord was re-designated and the 7th Infantry Division was reactivated with the realization that the two-year-old conflict of World War II could soon cross the Atlantic Ocean to involve America.

WHEREAS, in the wake of tragedy, these brave women and men — the Greatest Generation — answered the call to defend freedom, justice, and democracy across the Pacific, throughout Europe, and around the globe; and
WHEREAS, Today, we carry forward their spirit of unity and their enduring resolve to protect the United States against those who seek to do us harm; and WHEREAS, the Congress, by Public Law 103-308, as amended, has designated December 7 of each year as “National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.”
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, hereby declare December 7, 2023 as Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day and urges all our citizens in Seaside to honor and promote this observance. _________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
December 7, 2023
Packet Page 49

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.G.

TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Dominique Davis, City Clerk
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE A PROCLAMATION COMMEMORATING THE

ADOPTING OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN
RIGHTS, AND DECLARING DECEMBER 10 AS HUMAN RIGHTS
DAY

RECOMMENDATION
Approve a proclamation commemorating the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations General Assembly, and declaring December 10, 2023, as Human Rights Day in the City of Seaside.

BACKGROUND
Human Rights Day is observed annually on December 10th to commemorate the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a landmark document that outlines the fundamental rights and freedoms that all people are entitled to, regardless of their race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion, disability, or other status.

In recognition of Human Rights Day, the City Council is proposing to adopt a proclamation that reaffirms the City's commitment to upholding the fundamental human rights of all people. The proclamation also encourages residents to learn more about human rights issues, stand up against discrimination and injustice, and work together to create a community where everyone is treated with dignity and respect.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

Packet Page 50

Item No. 9.G. Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENTS

1. Human Rights Day Proclamation
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 51
City of Seaside

PROCLAMATION
Human Rights Day
December 10, 2023
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside is committed to upholding the fundamental human rights of all its residents, regardless of their race, ethnicity, origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, age, or economic status; and
WHEREAS, the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, enshrines the fundamental rights and freedoms that all human beings are entitled to; and WHEREAS, the City of Seaside recognizes that human rights are not only the foundation of a just and equitable society, but also essential to economic prosperity, social progress, and sustainable development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside is committed to fostering a community that is inclusive, just, and equitable for all;
WHEREAS, the month of December is recognized as Human Rights Month around the world, providing an opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to human rights and to take action to promote and protect them;
WHEREAS, We call upon all residents of the City of Seaside to join us in this important observance by:
• Reaffirming their commitment to the principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
• Learn more about human rights issues and the actions they can take to promote and protect human rights;
• Stand up against discrimination and injustice in all forms; • Work together to create a community where everyone is treated with dignity and respect.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, The Honorable Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, on behalf of the City Council, hereby declare December 10, 2023 as Human Rights Day and urges all our citizens in Seaside to support and promote this observance. _________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
December 7, 2023
Packet Page 52

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.H.

TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Nisha Patel, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Leslie Llantero, Assistant Engineer
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: REVIEW AND TAKE ACTION ON TRAFFIC ADVISORY

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE TRAFFIC

CALMING APPLICATION FOR SAN PABLO AVENUE BETWEEN

MESCAL STREET AND GENERAL JIM MOORE BOULEVARD

RECOMMENDATION
Approve design for traffic calming on San Pablo Avenue from Mescal Street to General Jim Moore Boulevard.

BACKGROUND
On October 20, 2022, the City Council approved the Traffic Calming Program (Program). The Program is designed to help manage traffic speed-related concerns along local and collector streets throughout the city. The Program provides information on the application process, educates applicants on traffic calming, and describes traffic calming measures approved for implementation on city streets. The Program considers applications on an annual basis. Applications are due by September 30th every year.

Two traffic calming applications were received during the application period:
1) San Pablo Avenue from Mescal Street to General Jim Moore Boulevard; and 2) Baker Street from San Lucas Street to Phoenix Avenue.

Once valid applications with petitions were received, staff collected data and assessed traffic conditions, and ranked traffic calming applications. Staff collected the speed and volume data for each roadway and reviewed traffic collisions along each roadway. This data as well as land uses were used in evaluating each roadway as follows:

Packet Page 53

Item No. 9.H. Page 2 of 3
Criteria
San Pablo
Avenue
Mescal to GJM
(1,770 ft
segment)
Baker Street
San Lucas to
Phoenix
(400 ft segment)
Volume Data (8pt max) 8 6
Collision Data (12pt max) 9 6
Speed Data (10pt max) 10 3
Pedestrian Facilities (5pt max) 3 3
Bicycle Facilities (5pt max) 3 5
Adjacent Land Use (10pt max) 2 2
Unique Conditions (5pt max) 1 0
Total (55pt max) 36 25
The San Pablo Avenue roadway segment, approximately 1,700 feet long, received 36 points and the Baker Street roadway segment, approximately 400 feet long, received 25 points. The traffic speed, volume data, and traffic collisions collected on both roadways revealed that Baker Street does not have as severe issues as San Pablo Avenue.

Staff presented the evaluations on both roadways segments at the November 21, 2023, Traffic Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting. Several members of the public were in attendance to support traffic calming on both roadway segments. Due to the evaluation score of the San Pablo Avenue roadway segment, the Traffic Advisory Committee recommends moving forward with a traffic calming design for San Pablo Avenue from Mescal Street to General Jim Moore Boulevard. In addition, the TAC requested staff return at a future TAC meeting to provide improvement options to address issues on Baker Street.

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY 2023/2024 adopted budget is $640,000.00 for traffic calming projects. There are sufficient funds in the budget to fund design for the San Pablo Traffic Calming Improvements Project.

ATTACHMENTS

1. San Pablo TC Application

2. San Pablo Ave Traffic Calming Evaluation Worksheet

3. Baker St TC Application

4. Baker St Traffic Calming Evaluation Worksheet
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

Packet Page 54

Item No. 9.H. Page 3 of 3
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 55

APPLICATION FEE PER THE CURRENT ADOPTED FEE SCHEDULE
Traffic Advisory Committee
Request Application
The following information is required to process all Traffic Advisory Committee requests. This information will be used to contact the applicant should staff have questions or needs clarification on the request. This information will also appear in the staff report presented to the Traffic Advisory Committee and/or City Council.

The Traffic Advisory Committee meets the 3rd Tuesday of every month at 5:00 PM in the City of Seaside’s City Hall Conference room. This meeting is open to the public and applicants are encouraged to attend.

Name: Date:

Address: Phone:

Type of Request (check all that apply):
□ Parking Designations □ Crosswalk □ Curb Markings (White, Yellow, etc.) □ Warning Sign □ Traffic Signal/Stop Sign □ Signing/Striping □ Other ______________________________________________________________________

FEES WILL APPLY FOR PARKING AND CURB MARKING REQUESTS
Request:

Request Procedures are outlined on the back of this form. For any questions regarding the Traffic Advisory Committee (TAC) please contact 899-6825.

STEPHEN MCKAY AUGUST 3, 2021
Traffic calming - upper San Pablo Ave - Speed Cushions
Traffic calming measures are needed on upper San Pablo Ave between General Jim Moore Blvd and Lincoln St.

Ideally, Speed Cushions will reduce the large number number of speeding vehicles at all hours of the day, every day. Only one 25mph sign at the top of San Pablo Ave does little to address the increased flow of through traffic since the road was opened through this residential neighborhood.

All signers of the petition live along this section of San Pablo Ave and are eager to have this safety issue addressed.

Packet Page 56

TAC REQUEST PROCEDURE
The Traffic Advisory Committee (TAC) acts as an advisory board to the City Council per Chapter 2.37 of the Municipal Code. Recommendations made by the TAC are to be ratified by the City Council prior to implementation. The TAC consists of five members: a Council Member; Director of Public Works; Chief of Police; Director of Community Development; and the Fire Chief. The TAC reviews all requests for traffic safety regulatory or control devices, signs and markings, and conducts studies as well as offers recommendations to the City Council, Planning Commission or appropriate City department.

Upon submittal of a request, staff will place the request on the next available TAC agenda for a future scheduled meeting. All TAC’s action will be forwarded for City Council consideration at their next available scheduled meeting.

Fees
Fees will be collected prior to installation of any approved requests that directly benefits the applicant, such as limited timed parking, white zones, etc. Prior to any required maintenance of the improvement, the same fee will apply and be billed to the applicant. The following fees have been determined based upon the cost of staff time and material for installation:

Description Fee*
Marking curb – per curb (20’ maximum length) Per current adopted fee schedule Installation of one sign
* Fees subject to change per City Council approved fee schedule. Fee determined by date of application.

PLEASE COMPLETE FOR

PARKING AND CURB MARKING REQUESTS

TAC REQUEST

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATEMENT
I,_______________________________________________understand that should my request be approved by the Traffic Advisory Committee and City Council, I will be responsible for the fee prior to the installation of my request. I also understand that if approved by City Council the improvements will be reviewed annually or whenever deemed appropriate by the Public Works Department for any required maintenance and I will be charged the corresponding fee. _________________________________________ _______________________ Applicant Signature Date
Packet Page 57
Stephen McKay
Seaside, CA 93955
June 6, 2021
Leslie Llantero
Assistant Engineer
City of Seaside
[email protected]
Dear Ms Llantero,
Attached please find the Petition to Install Speed Humps along a specific stretch of San Pablo Avenue in upper Seaside. I was originally directed to the County Petition form and it is accompanies the City of Seaside application here.

With the construction of General Jim Moore Blvd & the subsequent opening of San Pablo Blvd, our residential community has become a dangerously uncontrolled throughway.

The straight 5-block section of upper San Pablo Boulevard has speeding drivers at all hours of the day and night. There is no Speed Limit sign except for one for the Westbound traffic at the corner of General Jim Moore where motorists do not notice it. While the speed limit is 25 mph, vehicles frequently travel this residential section of San Pablo in excess of 50, 60 & 70 mph, especially during commute and school traffic hours.

While speaking to neighbors about this petition, all of them eagerly shared their dismay, anger, and especially fear, with the speeding vehicles that now disrupt the peaceful enjoyment of an otherwise enjoyable neighborhood.

Many of the residents who have signed this petition acknowledge they are often scared to pull their vehicles onto San Pablo Avenue because of the excessive vehicle speeds. One parent offered that his family no longer walks along San Pablo because it is unsafe. Another signer said that she watched an elderly neighbor nearly get hit by a vehicle while walking his dog across the street. I was not surprised to learn that I am not the only one given to Packet Page 58
yelling at motorists to slow down. Basically, we’re fed up and are desperately seeking help.

While we understand that Speed Humps are just one of the traffic calming resources available, my neighbors simply need something, anything, to be done that is a permanent solution to the speed problem before someone is injured or killed by a reckless, speeding motorist.

I spoke to a firefighter at the local station before gathering support from neighbors to find out if there would be any obvious objection to speed humps along San Pablo and was encouraged that they’d support such measures once the RMA-PW evaluation reaches their review.

As seen by this Petition, 34 of the 36 properties along upper San Pablo Blvd have residences that signed their support for a traffic calming measure.

With the evaluation, we are confident that this busy corridor meets and exceeds all the criteria necessary to address the dangerous roadway.

On behalf of my neighborhood, thank you for anything that may be done to restore safety to our neighborhood.

Respectfully,
Stephen McKay
Seaside, CA 93955
Packet Page 59
Packet Page 60
Packet Page 61
Packet Page 62
Packet Page 63
City of Seaside Traffic Calming Program – Modified 10.31.22

Page 31 ends

Appendix 2. Traffic Calming Evaluation Worksheet
This worksheet will be completed by the City of Seaside staff in accordance with the City’s Traffic Calming Program. It will be used to prioritize the potential initiation of specific neighborhood traffic calming processes.

Date: ___________________________
Location of Concern: ___________________________________________________________________

1. Traffic Volumes (mid-week volumes within the last two years) Greater than 2,000 vehicles per day = 8 points
1,500 to 2,000 vehicles per day = 6 points
1,000 to 1,500 vehicles per day = 4 points
Fewer than 1,000 vehicles per day = 0 points ______________

2. Reported Collision History on Local or Collector Streets More than five collisions in a three-year period = 12 points Two to four collisions in a three-year period = 9 points One to three collisions in a three-year period = 6 points ______________

3. Travel Speeds
85th percentile speed ≥ 10+ MPH over speed limit = 10 points 85th percentile speed ≥ 6+ MPH over speed limit = 6 points 85th percentile speed ≥ 3+ MPH over speed limit = 3 points ______________

4. Pedestrian Facilities
There is essentially no pedestrian space available = 5 points The pedestrian space needs improvement = 3 points ______________

5. Bicycle Facilities
There are no bicycle facilities = 5 points
There are existing or planned bicycle facilities = 3 points ______________

6. Adjacent Land Uses
The street segment is adjacent to parks, school, transit stop(s), shops, community facilities, etc. = 3 points for each school, 2 points for each other activity center destination (10 points maximum total) ______________

7. Unique Conditions
Unique conditions prevail such as sight distance constraints, parking on sidewalks, high truck volumes = 1 point for each unique condition (5 points maximum total) ______________
Total Score: ______________
Prepared By: ________________________________________________________________ Note: Worksheet may be amended based on use experiences.

San Pablo Ave. between Mescal St. and General Jim Moore Blvd. 12/20/22
Jennifer Shriber, Parisi Transportation Consulting
Speed limit = 25 MPH
85th percentile speed =

39.36 MPH 10
AADT = 2,185
8 Sidewalks on both
sides of street; few
3 ADA ramps present
Bike lanes at eastern
eastern end only
9 2 collisions from
2018-2020
Stuart Park located
across from San
Pablo/Mescal
intersection 2
3 1
4% truck volume
36 Packet Page 64
Packet Page 65
Packet Page 66
Packet Page 67
Packet Page 68
Packet Page 69
City of Seaside Traffic Calming Program – Modified 10.31.22

Page 31 ends

Date: ___________________________
Location of Concern: ___________________________________________________________________

4. Pedestrian Facilities
There is essentially no pedestrian space available = 5 points The pedestrian space needs improvement = 3 points ______________

5. Bicycle Facilities
There are no bicycle facilities = 5 points
There are existing or planned bicycle facilities = 3 points ______________

11/01/2023
Baker St between Birch Ave and Phoenix Ave
6 6
3 3
5 2
0 25
AADT = 1922
1 Collision from
2018 - 2020
Speed Limit = 25 MPH
85th percentile speed
= 28.27 MPH
Sidewalks on both
sides of street; few
ADA ramps present
No Bicycle facilities
available
Commercial facilities
such as restaurant &
gym located within 150
Ft of Baker St/Phoenix
Ave Intersection
No unique conditions
Sharanya Varma , Parametrix
Packet Page 70

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.I.

TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Nisha Patel, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Leslie Llantero, Assistant Engineer
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PARAMETRIX INC. FOR THE SAN

PABLO TRAFFIC CALMING WORK PLAN AND DESIGN FOR AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $81,610.00

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Parametrix Inc. for the San Pablo Traffic Calming Work Plan and Design for an amount not to exceed $81,610.00.

BACKGROUND
The Traffic Advisory Committee (TAC) considered the San Pablo Traffic Calming Application at their November 21, 2023 meeting. Points were given to each category based upon the Traffic Calming Evaluation Worksheet scoring criteria established in the Traffic Calming Program adopted by the City Council on October 20, 2022. Based upon the traffic data, the Traffic Advisory Committee approved moving forward with further evaluation and design of traffic calming measures for San Pablo Avenue from Mescal Street to General Jim Moore Boulevard. The Traffic Advisory Committee recommendation will be presented, as a separate item, for consideration at this December 7, 2023 City Council meeting.

Staff requested and Parametrix Inc. submitted a proposal for a traffic calming design for San Pablo Avenue. The scope of work included: project management; traffic data and collision data review; traffic calming toolkit community survey; development of traffic calming plan; base mapping; 65% & 95% construction documents; final bid set plans, specifications and construction cost estimate; bid support and construction coordination; and public outreach. Development of the traffic calming plan and design Packet Page 71

Item No. 9.I. Page 2 of 2
is expected to take seven months for an amount not to exceed $81,610.00. Staff agrees with the scope and fee of the Parametrix proposal.

FISCAL IMPACT
The budget for traffic calming projects, account No. 212-8960-9580, is $640,000.00 identified in the FY 2023/2024 approved budget. There are sufficient funds in the traffic calming budget to approve Parametrix Inc. professional service agreement for an amount not to exceed $81,610.00

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Parametrix Professional Services Agreement
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 72
RESOLUTION NO. 23-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH PARAMETRIX INC.

TO PREPARE THE SAN PABLO AVENUE TRAFFIC CALMING WORK PLAN AND DESIGN FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $81,610.00
WHEREAS, a Traffic Advisory Committee application was received from two applicants requesting traffic calming on San Pablo Avenue between Mescal Street to General Jim Moore Boulevard and Baker Street from San Lucas Street to Phoenix Avenue; and
WHEREAS, traffic data was collected and evaluated on both street segments and presented at the November 21, 2023 Traffic Advisory Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, based upon the evaluation of both street segments, San Pablo Avenue was selected to move forward with a conceptual plan and design; and WHEREAS, at the request of staff, Parametrix Inc. submitted a proposal to provide San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan and Design, to include project management; traffic data and collision data review; traffic calming toolkit community survey; development of traffic calming plan; base mapping; 65% & 95% construction documents; final bid set plans, specifications and construction cost estimate; bid support and construction coordination; and public outreach; and WHEREAS, staff agrees with the scope and fee of the Parametrix proposal; and WHEREAS, Parametrix is included on the approved On-Call List for Transportation Engineering.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside do hereby authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Parametrix Inc. for the San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan and Design for an amount not to exceed $81,610.00; and
Packet Page 73
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute up to an additional 10% contingency of Parmaetrix Inc. Professional Services Agreement, as outlined above such that the full value of the agreement may not exceed $89,771.00.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of Seaside City Council duly held on the 7th day of December, 2023 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

APPROVED:
______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 74
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan
Rev. 1/18 Page 1 COS Design PSA

CITY OF SEASIDE

DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT

FOR THE SAN PABLO AVENUE TRAFFIC CALMING WORK PLAN
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective December 7, 2023, between the City of Seaside, a municipal corporation ("Agency") and Parametrix Inc., a corporation (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on the effective date above and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2025 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2. SERVICES
Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. PERFORMANCE
Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his/her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. AGENCY MANAGEMENT
Agency’s City Engineer shall represent Agency in all matters pertaining to the administration of this Agreement, review and approval of all products submitted by Consultant, but not including the authority to enlarge the Tasks to Be Performed or change the compensation due to Consultant. Agency’s City Manager shall be authorized to act on Agency's behalf and to execute all necessary documents which enlarge the Tasks to Be Performed or change Consultant's compensation, subject to Section 5 hereof.

Packet Page 75
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan
Rev. 1/18 Page 2 COS Design PSA

5. PAYMENT
(a) The Agency agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Eighty One Thousand Six Hundred Ten Dollars ($81,610.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. (b) Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the Agency City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by Agency City Manager and Consultant at the time Agency's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services.
(c) Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, or as soon thereafter as practical, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the Agency disputes any of Consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.

6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE (a) The Agency may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the Agency suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
(b) In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the Agency shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the Agency. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.

Packet Page 76
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan
Rev. 1/18 Page 3 COS Design PSA

7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT
(a) The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, Agency shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. (b) If the Agency Manager or his/her delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he/she shall cause to be served upon the Consultant a written notice of the default.

The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the Agency shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
(a) Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts, and other such information required by Agency that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of Agency or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records; shall give Agency the right to examine and audit said books and records; shall permit Agency to make transcripts therefrom as necessary; and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
(b) Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the Agency and may be used, reused, or otherwise disposed of by the Agency without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the Agency, at the Consultant's office and upon reasonable Packet Page 77
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan
Rev. 1/18 Page 4 COS Design PSA
written request by the Agency, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring, and printing computer files.

9. INDEMNITY AND DEFENSE
(a) Indemnification and Defense for Professional Services To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Agency and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees and costs, to the extent they arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. Consultant’s duty to defend shall consist of reimbursement of defense costs incurred by Agency in direct proportion to the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

Consultant’s percentage of fault shall be determined, as applicable, by a court of law, jury or arbitrator. In the event any loss, liability or damage is incurred by way of settlement or resolution without a court, jury or arbitrator having made a determination of the Consultant’s percentage of fault, the parties agree to mediation with a third party neutral to determine the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault for purposes of determining the amount of indemnity and defense cost reimbursement owed to the Agency.
(b) For All Other Liabilities
Notwithstanding the foregoing and without diminishing any rights of Agency under Section 9.A, for any liability, claim, demand, allegation against Agency arising out of, related to, or pertaining to any act or omission of Consultant, but which is not a design professional service, Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Agency, its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorney fees and expert witness fees), judgments, settlements, and/or arbitration awards, whether for personal or bodily injury, property damage, or economic injury, and arising out of, related to, any concurrent or contributory negligence on the part of the Agency, except for the sole or active negligence of, or willful misconduct of the Agency.

10. INSURANCE
Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit C attached to and part of this Agreement.

Packet Page 78
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan
Rev. 1/18 Page 5 COS Design PSA

11. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT
(a) Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the Agency a wholly independent Consultant. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither Agency nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers, employees, or agents of the Agency. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatever against Agency, or bind Agency in any manner.
(b) No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, Agency shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for Agency. Agency shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES
The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The Agency, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this Section.

13. UNDUE INFLUENCE
Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure is used against or in concert with any officer or employee of the Agency in connection with the award, terms or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of the Agency will receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from Consultant, or from any officer, employee or agent of Consultant, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling the City to any and all remedies at law or in equity.

Packet Page 79
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan
Rev. 1/18 Page 6 COS Design PSA

14. NO BENEFIT TO ARISE TO LOCAL EMPLOYEES
No member, officer, or employee of Agency, or their designees or agents, and no public official who exercises authority over or responsibilities with respect to the Project during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any agreement or sub-agreement, or the proceeds thereof, for work to be performed in connection with the Project performed under this Agreement.

15. RELEASE OF INFORMATION/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
(a) All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without Agency's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants, shall not without written authorization from the Agency Manager or unless requested by the Agency Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories, or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the Agency. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives Agency notice of such court order or subpoena.
(b) Consultant shall promptly notify Agency should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions, or other discovery request, court order, or subpoena from any person or party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the Agency. Agency retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing, or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with Agency and to provide the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, Agency's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by Agency to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

16. NOTICES
Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by notice:

Packet Page 80
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan
Rev. 1/18 Page 7 COS Design PSA
To Agency: __City of Seaside__________
__440 Harcourt Ave________
__Seaside, CA 93955_______
Attention: City Clerk
To Consultant: Parametrix Inc.
800 Bancroft Way, Suite 203
Berkeley, CA 94710

17. ASSIGNMENT
The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the Agency. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, David Parisi shall be the Project Manager and Engineer of Record for the services described in this Agreement.

David Parisi may use assistants, under its direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide Agency fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of David Parisi from Consultant's employ. Should he/she leave Consultant's employ, the Agency shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period.

Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the Governing Board and the Consultant.

18. LICENSES
At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

19. GOVERNING LAW
The Agency and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the Agency.

20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or Packet Page 81
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan
Rev. 1/18 Page 8 COS Design PSA
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

21. WORK SCHEDULED/TIME OF COMPLETION
Agency and Consultant agree that time is of the essence in this Agreement. Agency and Consultant further agree that Consultants shall follow schedule as described in Exhibit A. Consultant shall not be responsible for delays caused by circumstances beyond its sole reasonable control.

22. CONTENTS OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND PROPOSAL
Consultant is bound by the contents of Agency's Request for Proposal, Exhibit D hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and the contents of the proposal submitted by the Consultant, Exhibit A hereto. In the event of conflict, the requirements of Agency's Request for Proposals and this Agreement shall take precedence over those contained in the Consultant's proposals.

23. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT
The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he/she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CONSULTANT: Parametrix Inc.

By: ______________________________ Date:_________________ Nathan Johnson, Senior Vice President
City of Seaside
A Municipal Corporation
______________________________ Date:_________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 82
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Work Plan
Rev. 1/18 Page 9 COS Design PSA
Attachments: Exhibit A Scope of Work/Consultant Proposal Exhibit B Fee Schedule
Exhibit C Insurance Requirements
Exhibit D RFQ: On-Call Consultants – Engineering Transportation Services
Exhibit E Resolution 22-21 Approving On Call Engineering Transportation Services
Packet Page 83
Scope of Work
800 Bancroft Way, Suite 203 • Berkeley, CA 94710 | 510.343.6400 | Parametrix.com City of Seaside
Department of Public Works
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Plan
Introduction
Parisi Transportation Consulting, a division of Parametrix (Parametrix), is pleased to provide a workplan to execute the below tasks as a part of developing a concept plan and to prepare construction documents for traffic calming on San Pablo Avenue between Mescal Street and General Jim Moore Boulevard. Learnings and practices worth replicating from the Hilby Avenue Traffic Calming Project, which has recently presented concept traffic calming plan to the City’s Traffic Advisory Committee in September 2023, will be utilized as an input for the project. Parametrix’ work plan consists of the following seven tasks:

Task 01 – Project Management
Objectives
The objective of this task is to provide overall project management of the consultant contract with City of Seaside Public Works (mainly Leslie Llantero). This task includes general management functions that include the following:
• Kick-off meeting – Attend virtual kick-off meeting with the City of Seaside’s project manager to discuss scope of work, schedule, and roles and responsibilities. • Project Planning – Document and communicate the scope of work, budget, and schedule as a road map for the project team. Coordinate project team and issues throughout the project. • Project Schedule Tracking – Establish project schedule within one week of project initiation and track progress against schedule milestones throughout the project • Budget Tracking – Track the project budget using Parametrix in-house tools to verify that progress is keeping pace with spending.
• Monthly design team meetings, transitioning to bi-weekly meetings beginning with Task 06. • Monthly Progress Reports – Prepare a monthly invoice for services performed by Parametrix. • Correspondence – Prepare written correspondence as needed to document project management issues and/or concerns.

Deliverables
Deliverables for this task include:
• Project schedule with key milestones
• Miscellaneous correspondence to document project management issues. • Bi-weekly meeting minutes and monthly progress reports enclosed with invoices.

Packet Page 84
Scope of Work
City of Seaside
Department of Public Works 2 November 18, 2023
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Plan
Assumptions
Assumptions for this task include:
• Budget assumes 12 teleconference meetings after kick-off meeting.

Task 02 – Review of Collision Data, Traffic Volumes,
and Travel Speeds
Task Objectives
The objective of this task is to characterize existing conditions along San Pablo Avenue between Mescal Street and General Jim Moore Boulevard in order to inform the extent of current traffic patterns and need for traffic calming as well as effectiveness of potential traffic calming measures.

This task includes the following:
• Collision Analysis – Analyze the most recent five years of available collision data, from 2017- 2021. Data will be retrieved from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

Collisions located on San Pablo Avenue between Mescal Street and General Jim Moore Boulevard will be considered along with collisions that occurred up to 150 feet along each side street. Data analysis will consist of both summary statistics and geospatial analysis. The data will be summarized to identify trends in severity, travel mode, and other relevant factors. The collisions will be mapped to identify hot spots for all collisions as well as those involving pedestrians and bicyclists. Hot spot locations for specific collision types and primary collision factors will also be considered.
• Traffic Volumes and Travel Speeds – Evaluate daily traffic count data and travel speed data collected by the City of Seaside on San Pablo Avenue in November 2022. Data will be summarized and displayed in a fashion that will assist in characterizing existing conditions and for use in future tasks.

Deliverables
• Summary of collision data tables
• Corridor collision maps
• Summary of vehicular speed data
• Summary of average daily traffic counts
Assumptions
• Traffic volume and travel speed data collected by the City of Seaside is available for analysis by Parametrix
Packet Page 85
Scope of Work
City of Seaside
Department of Public Works 3 November 18, 2023
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Plan
Task 03 – Traffic Calming Toolkit Community
Survey
Task Objectives
The objective of this task is to engage the local community on the project and collect input that will be used to inform development of the preliminary traffic calming plan along San Pablo Avenue between Mescal Street and General Jim Moore Boulevard. Input will be gathered by an online survey.

This task includes the following:
• Traffic Calming Toolkit – Develop a traffic calming toolkit based on the results of Tasks 2 and 3 and the previous Hilby Avenue Traffic Calming Project. The “toolkit” will list potential traffic calming measures that could be considered along San Pablo Avenue. Each measure will be identified with a photo or illustration, pros and cons for its potential application along the roadway, and approximate installation cost.
• Community Survey – Development of a publicly-accessible internet-based survey that will solicit input from community members regarding use of San Pablo Avenue and challenges in traversing the corridor. Survey will be made available to the public two weeks prior to and three weeks after the outreach meeting occurs. Responses will be collected online as well as with physical mailed responses.
• Public Input Received – All input received from the public survey will be summarized. Themes of frequent input topics or regarding potential effectiveness of traffic calming “toolkit” measures at specific locations will be highlighted.

Deliverables
• Development of San Pablo Avenue traffic calming toolkit • Copy for survey invitation
• Published internet-based community survey
• Written summary of input received from community survey Assumptions
• The City of Seaside will advertise the public survey and distribute invitations to the survey via various forums (e.g. mailed postcards, displayed flyers, website, etc.) Task 04 – Development of Traffic Calming Plan
Task Objectives
The objective of this task is to develop an approach to meet traffic calming goals by employing traffic calming measures in a plan for San Pablo Avenue from Mescal Street to General Jim Moore Boulevard. This task includes the following:
• Traffic Calming Plan – Information from the existing conditions survey and best practices from the previous Hilby Avenue Traffic Calming Project will be incorporated into development of a traffic calming plan. Traffic calming measures will be illustrated in a conceptual fashion on the existing conditions mapping. Parametrix will coordinate with the City of Seaside when Packet Page 86
Scope of Work
City of Seaside
Department of Public Works 4 November 18, 2023
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Plan
developing the plan. The plan will be prepared on the base maps, which will illustrate conceptual designs with annotations and inset photos of sample treatments. • Planning Level Construction Cost Estimate – A planning level construction cost estimate for implementation of the plan will be compiled.

Deliverables
• Traffic calming plan (strip map)
• Traffic Calming Plan (three plan sheets)
• Planning level construction cost estimate
Assumptions
• It is assumed that traffic calming measures similar to those developed for Hilby Avenue will be employed on San Pablo Avenue. Measures such as neighborhood traffic circles or other roadway reconfigurations can be for an additional fee.

Task 05 – Draft Construction Documents
Parametrix will prepare construction documents for San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming improvements.

Plans will be prepared on 22”x34” size sheets at 1” = 20’ scale using topographic base map files provided by our subcontractor. Construction standards and specifications will be consistent with the latest version of City of Seaside standards and Caltrans construction standards. Plans will be submitted to the City in PDF format for review only.

The 65% level design will provide a layout of the proposed crossing improvements with proposed curb ramp grading and drainage based on the City of Seaside Standards and Caltrans Standards Plans and Specifications. Proposed curb ramp and poles will be checked for driver visibility and conformance to ADA and CA MUTCD guidelines. Pole locations will account for and avoid identified underground utility locations. Improvements will account for underground utilities as shown in topographic mapping provided.

Cost estimates will follow the City standard format. Responses to City comments will be tracked and discussed in-person with City staff after review of the 65% and 95% submittals and evaluated whether additional submittals will be required or whether comments can be incorporated into the next submittal. Editorial or formatting issues not affecting the design intent or constructability of the project will be identified in the Parametrix-City design review meeting and will be incorporated into a subsequent submittal.

Parametrix will prepare technical specifications, a bid schedule, and a cost estimate for items in the scope of work. The cost estimate will include calculation summaries for the basis of quantities.

Packet Page 87
Scope of Work
City of Seaside
Department of Public Works 5 November 18, 2023
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Plan
Subtask 05-01 – Existing Conditions Field Review and Base Mapping
Objective/Goal
Parametrix will apply available data provided by the City of Seaside and perform a topographic survey at up to two proposed crosswalk improvement locations. Parametrix will gather available parcel data and perform a cursory right-of-way evaluation within each project area.

A scaled base map will be developed showing existing conditions along the approximately 1,800- foot-long segment of San Pablo Avenue between Mescal Street and General Jim Moore Boulevard.

The base map will include curbs, sidewalks, curb marking, no parking areas, crosswalks, lane lines, and signing. Roadways, key landmarks, and address numbers will be annotated on the map. Curb-tocurb dimensions will be shown for each block of San Pablo Avenue. The base map will be prepared as a 1” = 20’ scale strip map. The base will also be prepared to fit approximately three plan sheets (at 22” x 34”).

Deliverables
Deliverables for this task include:

1. Review of existing conditions through a detailed in-person field visit and laid out on an aerial base map of San Pablo Avenue from Mescal Street to General Jim Moore Boulevard. This will include locations of existing signage, existing pavement markings, and existing red curb, infield curb to curb dimensions, as well as grade verification at median island treatment locations, if part of the traffic calming plan.

2. Topographic survey provided by a sub-contractor at up to two intersections identified for proposed crosswalk improvement and curb treatment locations.

3. Cursory right-of-way evaluation within project area.

4. Base mapping of existing conditions
Assumptions

1. It is assumed that traffic calming measures similar to those developed for Hilby Avenue will be employed on San Pablo Avenue (e.g. striping, median islands, vertical deflection elements, up to two crosswalk improvements, and improved sightlines with red curb).

Measures such as neighborhood traffic circles or other curb or roadway reconfigurations can be incorporated in all subtasks under Task 06 for an additional fee.

2. No additional survey is needed, and existing conditions are sufficiently available for reference.

3. This task assumes the preliminary improvement plans are within the public right-of-way and parcel boundary surveys will not be required. Parcel boundary surveys can be performed for an additional fee, if needed.

4. Utility location information will be based off of data provided by the City Packet Page 88
Scope of Work
City of Seaside
Department of Public Works 6 November 18, 2023
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Plan
Subtask 05-02 – 65% and 95% Plans Specifications and Estimates Objective/Goal
To prepare construction documents, cost estimate and technical specifications for the civil, roadway surface improvements (e.g. slurry seal), striping, and signage improvements along San Pablo Avenue. A submission will be made at the 65% and 95% design completion. Plans will be prepared on 22”x34” size sheets at 1” = 20’ scale for signage and striping plans. Best practices for specifications and estimates from the Hilby Avenue Traffic Calming Project will be leveraged for efficiency, where applicable.

Deliverables
Deliverables for this task include:

1. Title sheet & notes, project layout and control, and BMPs (estimated 3 sheets)

2. Demolition and Civil Plans (estimated 7 sheets) to include:
• Pavement improvement (slurry seal) sheets
• Demo/Layout Sheets
• Flowline and Grading Sheets for curb ramp improvements • Civil Detail Sheets

3. Signage and Striping Plans (estimated 8 sheets) to include:
• Pavement delineation (striping) plan (three sheets) for the corridor. • Signage plan for the Hilby Avenue corridor (three sheets). • Signage and Striping Detail Sheet
• Signage and Striping Quantity Sheet

4. Project Specifications, Quantity Takeoffs and Cost Estimate. Parametrix will provide Technical Specifications for all items noted in the Bid Items list. Quantity takeoffs showing the calculated quantities will be provided in XLSX format. Parametrix will use recent bid results from the City and other projects in the San Francisco Bay Area to develop a total Project cost estimate. The PS&E will include estimate for construction time.

Subtask 05-03 – 100% Bid Set Plans Specifications and Estimates Objective/Goal
To integrate one set of non-conflicting comments compiled by the City relating to the design and will prepare a 100% final bid set. The budget for this task assumes that the City’s comments from the 95% phase will cover all substantive design issues. Comments received on the 100% Plans concerning design issues not previously identified and discussed at the 95% design that trigger an additional submittal may be subject to additional cost. Construction estimates and bid table will be produced for the extent of San Pablo Avenue from Mescal Street to General Jim Moore Boulevard.

Deliverables
Deliverables for this task include:

Packet Page 89
Scope of Work
City of Seaside
Department of Public Works 7 November 18, 2023
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Plan

1. Civil, Striping, and Signage Plans submittal in PDF format at 100% Bid Construction level.

2. Technical specifications provided in MS Word format at the 100% Bid Construction Level.

3. Engineer’s estimate in PDF and MS Excel format at the 100% Bid Construction Level.

4. Construction bid table in XLSX format.

Task 06 – Bid Support and Construction Coordination
Objective/Goal
To provide support to the City in responding to questions during the bid, pre-construction, and construction stages. Parametrix will respond to product submittals and Requests for Information from the contractor and address other design issues raised during construction.

Task 07 – Public Outreach
Task Objectives
The objective of this task is to present the traffic calming plan for San Pablo Avenue between Mescal Street and General Jim Moore Boulevard at up to two in-person hearings in the City of Seaside.

Hearing forums and dates for presentation will be decided upon between Parametrix and City staff upon commencement of the project. This task includes the following:
• Invitations – Prior to the meetings, invitations will be prepared and coordinated with City staff. Invitations will be prepared in both English and Spanish. • Presentation – the corridor existing conditions and traffic calming plan will be presented.

Deliverables
• Two meeting invitations
• Two meeting presentation slide shows
Assumptions
• The City of Seaside will advertise the meetings and distribute invitations via various forums (e.g. mailed postcards, displayed flyers, website, etc.) • Preparation for and attendance at additional in-person meetings can be arranged for additional cost.

Packet Page 90
Scope of Work
City of Seaside
Department of Public Works 8 November 18, 2023
San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Plan
Budget
Parametrix will conduct all work on a time-and-materials basis, with a cost not to exceed $80,140.

Parametrix will invoice monthly in accordance with the City’s requirements. Payments are to be received within 30 days of receipt.

Schedule
The project is estimated to require four months from initiation to completion of Task 05. Tasks are assumed to be undertaken with opportunity for schedule optimization. The following shows the expected duration of each task, assuming the project commences on November 27, 2023. Should optional tasks be enacted, the proposed schedule will be revised at that time. • Task 01: Full project duration
• Task 02: December 2023
• Task 03: December 2023 - January 2024
• Task 04: January - February 2024
• Task 05: March - June 2024
• Task 06: After completion of Task 05
• Task 07: TBD
In Closing
We look forward to serving the City of Seaside on this important project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,
David Parisi, PE, TE
Principal Consultant
Principal
Consultant
Senior
Consultant
Engineer
IV
Engineer
I
Project
Controls
Task $360 $230 $170 $130 $150 Expenses Totals
1 Project Management 8 32 8 $9,520 $9,520
2 Review of Collision Data, Traffic Volume, Travel Speeds 2 2 12 28 $6,860 $6,860 3 Community Survey 4 12 16 $5,560 $5,560
4 Development of Traffic Calming Plan 4 4 8 32 $7,880 $7,880 5 Draft Construction Documents:

5.01 Field Review and Base Mapping (incl. survey sub-contractor) 2 4 8 12 $4,560 $7,000 $11,560

5.02 65% and 95% Plans Specifications and Estimates 6 12 28 72 $19,040 $19,040

5.03 100% Bid Set Plans Specifications and Estimates 2 4 12 24 $6,800 $6,800 6 Bid Support and Construction Coordination 2 6 8 16 $5,540 $5,540 7 Public Outreach 2 24 16 $6,880 $500 $7,380
Totals 32 32 144 216 8 $72,640 $7,500 $80,140
Labor
Total
Packet Page 91
800 Bancroft Way, Suite 203 • Berkeley, CA 94710 | 510.343.6400 | Parametrix.com

HOURLY SERVICE RATES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024
Principal Consultant $390.00
Sr Consultant $250.00
Sr Planner $240.00
Engineer IV $185.00
Engineer III $160.00
Planner III $160.00
Sr Graphic Designer $160.00
Sr Project Accountant $155.00
Sr Project Controls Specialist $155.00
Engineer I $135.00
Planner II $130.00
Planner I $125.00
Notes:

Hourly service rates are effective through September 30, 2024 Reimbursable charges include, but are not limited to, transportation charges, reproduction services, shipping expenses and subconsultant fees. Mileage charges will be charged at the prevailing IRS rate per mile.

Monthly invoices are due withing 30 days from the date of the invoice.

Packet Page 92
San Pablo Ave Traffic Calming Work Plan EXHIBIT C

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of Agency, and prior to commencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to Agency.

General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.

Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.

Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.

Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000).

Consultant shall submit to Agency, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of Agency, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.

Umbrella or excess liability insurance. [Optional depending on limits required].

Consultant shall obtain and maintain an umbrella or excess liability insurance policy with limits that will provide bodily injury, personal injury and property damage liability coverage at least as broad as the primary coverages set forth above, including Packet Page 93
San Pablo Ave Traffic Calming Work Plan EXHIBIT C
commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability. Such policy or policies shall include the following terms and conditions:
• A drop down feature requiring the policy to respond if any primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason;
• Pay on behalf of wording as opposed to reimbursement; • Concurrency of effective dates with primary policies; • Policies shall “follow form” to the underlying primary policies; and • Insureds under primary policies shall also be insureds under the umbrella or excess policies.

Other provisions or requirements
Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to Agency as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by Agency’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance.

Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with Agency at all times during the term of this contract. Agency reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Work hereunder by Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.

Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by Agency shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of Agency before the Agency’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

Agency’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Agency has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Agency will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Agency will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments.

In the alternative, Agency may cancel this Agreement.

Packet Page 94
San Pablo Ave Traffic Calming Work Plan EXHIBIT C
Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the Agency’s Risk Manager.

Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against Agency, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against Agency, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.

Enforcement of contract provisions (non estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the Agency to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the Agency nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the Agency requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the Agency.

Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to Agency with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage.

Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that Agency and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.

Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting Packet Page 95
San Pablo Ave Traffic Calming Work Plan EXHIBIT C
endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to Agency and approved of in writing.

Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.

Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to Agency for review.

Agency’s right to revise specifications. The Agency reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the Agency and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation.

Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by Agency. Agency reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by Agency.

Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give Agency prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this AGREEMENT, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.

Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.

Packet Page 96
J:\08_PUBLIC WORKS\Personnel\Traffic Engineer\2020 On-Call List\RFQ Traffic Engineer 2020_2020-10-15.docx

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
2020 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES

FOR CITY OF SEASIDE
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Proposal Requirements .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Statement of Qualifications Submittal Requirements ................................................................................................ 1 Schedule for Selection Process ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Questions Regarding This Project ................................................................................................................................. 2 Form of Agreement ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Evaluation and Rating Criteria ...................................................................................................................................... 3 QUALIFICATIONS ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF SERVICES ..................................................................................................................... 4 General Provisions ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Non-Discrimination & Non-Preferential Treatment .................................................................................................. 6 Grounds for Disqualification ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Records and Financial Data ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction
The City of Seaside (City) seeks Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) from qualified firms to provide professional Traffic Engineering (consultant) services. The City intends to select up to three consultants for a three-year period, with the option of two (2) one-year extensions through mutual consent between the City and the chosen Consultant(s). Consultants do not need to be able to provide all services described in the “Preliminary Scope of Services,” below. Selection will be based on demonstrated expertise in providing support to the City of Seaside Public Works and Engineering Department.

Proposal Requirements
SOQs must be received by 3:00 PM November 10, 2020 at the following address:

Nisha Patel, City Engineer
City of Seaside
440 Harcourt Avenue
Seaside, CA 93955
SOQ received after this deadline will not be accepted. The SOQ and any accompanying documents shall be submitted in a sealed envelope with the words “Traffic Engineering Services” clearly marked in the lower left-hand corner of the envelope. Three bound copies, plus one electronic copy submitted on CD, USB flash drive, or by email to [email protected], containing an Adobe pdf copy, should be submitted.

Statement of Qualifications Submittal Requirements
The SOQ should include the following information:

1. Name of proposer and principal contact person, including office location, address, telephone number, fax numbers and e-mail address.

Packet Page 97
City of Seaside-Request for Qualifications
Traffic Engineering Services
- 2 -

2. Brief description and history of the proposed project team and experience of the principal contact. Clearly describe project team member’s experience in traffic engineering design, traffic analysis, traffic calming, and transportation studies. Describe the average project size and scope of the team member’s past projects.

3. Provide as exhibits, listings of your firm’s and its principals’ experience.

4. Enclosed is a copy of the City’s standard contract, which stipulates, among other things, insurance requirements. Please confirm that the project team can accept the terms of the contract and has the required insurance, or can acquire insurance, that meets the minimum standards.

5. Please provide at least three professional references. Indicate which references are public agencies for which the project team, or its principals, have provided services for within the past five years.

6. Standard Hourly Fees: Provide your standard hourly fees by job classification and billing criteria for providing the services described in this RFQ in a separate sealed envelope. Do not provide in the response to this request as an exhibit or in the body of the response The SOQ will be limited to 10 numbered pages including title sheet and cover letter if provided.

Minimum font size is 12. Page size is limited to letter size with no fold-outs. Submittals must be printed on both sides of the paper. A clear front and back cover shall be provided and the front and back clear cover will not count towards the 10 page limit.

Schedule for Selection Process
The proposed consultant selection schedule is as follows.

Release RFP Tuesday, October 20, 2020
Proposal due Tuesday, November 10, 2020
Interview Select Proposers, if necessary November 10 to 25, 2020 if needed Project Award December 17, 2020
Questions Regarding This Project
All questions and/or contacts regarding this Request should be directed to:

Misty Bradshaw
City of Seaside-Engineering Division
440 Harcourt Avenue
Seaside, CA 93955
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone (831) 899-6886
Packet Page 98
City of Seaside-Request for Qualifications
Traffic Engineering Services
- 3 -
Form of Agreement
A copy of the City of Seaside Consultant Contract is included herewith.

Evaluation and Rating Criteria
City staff will review each SOQ for completeness and content. Each SOQ will be evaluated based upon the relevant qualifications and experience of the consultant. Consultants do not need to be able to provide all services described in the “Preliminary Scope of Services,” below. Staff may conduct interviews if necessary. References may also be verified. The SOQ review will focus upon the following criteria:

1. Proposal: Organization, presentation, and content of proposal. Conformance to the specified proposal format. – Max 5 points.

2. Company/Organization: Does the firm/individual offer the quality of services required for the types of services listed in the Scope of Work? Consultants do not need to be able to provide all services described in the “Preliminary Scope of Services,” below. Has the firm/individual demonstrated the ability to successfully provide services for projects of a similar complexity and nature as described herein? Firm possess familiarity with the locality and ability to perform services within the City of Seaside. Ability to respond to request for services in a timely manner and to facilitate meetings with City Staff. – Max 35 points.

3. Project Team: Do the qualifications of key personnel to be assigned to the anticipated projects coincide with tasks listed in the Scope of Work? Does the principal contact and the assigned personnel have requisite education, experience, and professional qualifications? – Max 35 points.

4. Contractual Ability: Confirmed acceptance of standard contract. – Max 5 points.

5. Past Performance: Are the firm’s/individual’s references from past clients and associates favorable? Are deliverables submitted on time and within budget? - Max 20 points.

Proposals will be ranked on the basis of qualifications. The City of Seaside may conduct interviews with some or all of the firms/individuals who submit proposals, or it may complete its evaluation based on the proposals alone. If interviews are conducted, firms/individuals selected for interview will be contacted at that time to arrange the date and time for their interview.

QUALIFICATIONS
Interested consultants should possess competency in the following areas of expertise and documents:
 General traffic engineering and provide a project manager that possesses certification as a Traffic Engineer from the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors and Geologists.
 Traffic Signal design (per Caltrans and City standards)  California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices latest Edition  ITE Traffic Control Devices Handbook
 ASSHTO Roadside Design Guide
 Familiarity with Caltrans Standards
Packet Page 99
City of Seaside-Request for Qualifications
Traffic Engineering Services
- 4 -

PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of work will vary as need arises and will be at the discretion of the City. Provide Traffic Engineering services for various projects at the request of city staff. The request for services may include:
 Conduct or review traffic engineering, traffic analysis, and transportation planning studies or project specific traffic related issues analysis;  Provide comprehensive analyses of existing and projected traffic conditions; roundabout analysis and design, intersection design, speed humps, and traffic data collection services:
 Provide electronic traffic control device studies and design (signs, signals, pavement markings, and school zone flashers);
 Perform pedestrian and bicycle studies including those to provide safe routes to school;  Review subdivision or new development projects involving traffic impact analyses, transportation modeling, area-wide transportation studies and road impact fee analyses;  Traffic signal design including plans, specifications, engineer’s cost estimate and contract bid documents (for projects that are bid) for new permanent signal installation; modifications to existing signals and flashing beacon;
 Speed data analysis, intersection control studies including multi way stop control and traffic signal or alternatives, safety studies, and miscellaneous traffic engineering services.
 Transportation, roadway, and Complete Streets design including construction drawings or plans, specifications, engineer’s cost estimate and contract bid documents.  Construction management and inspection support for roadway improvement and transportation projects.
 Assist and provide technical assistance in identification and preparation of various traffic and roadway improvement grant opportunities and applications.

The consultant will not be allowed to provide services when the City determines a potential conflict of interest may exist.

Consultant services will be on an as-needed, on-call basis. Consultant services will be authorized by separate contract(s). The Consultant is responsible for acknowledging receipt of requests for services within two (2) working days. Contracts may vary significantly in size and scope and will be determined in greater detail as each is assigned. The Consultant will be responsible for preparing a detailed scope and fee estimate for each contract request. The City may accept the Consultant’s scope and fee or negotiate with the Consultant, as appropriate. The City reserves the right to not accept the Consultant’s scope and fee.

General Provisions

1. The City will assume no responsibility for any understandings or representations concerning conditions made by any of its officers or employees prior to execution of a final agreement unless they are included in this Request for Qualifications.

2. Any reasonable inquiry to determine the responsibility of a prospective Consultant(s) may be conducted. The submission of Qualifications shall constitute permission by the prospective Consultant(s) for the City to verify all information contained therein. If the Packet Page 100
City of Seaside-Request for Qualifications
Traffic Engineering Services
- 5 -
City deems it necessary, additional information may be requested from the prospective Consultant(s) for further consideration.

3. A prospective Consultant(s) may withdraw their Qualifications at any time prior to the date and time which is set forth herein as the deadline for acceptance of Qualifications.

4. Each prospective Consultant(s) submitting Qualifications in response to this Request agrees the preparation of all materials for submittal to the City and all presentations are at the prospective entities sole cost and expense, and the City will not, under any circumstances, be responsible for any costs or expenses incurred by a prospective Consultant(s). In addition, each prospective Consultant(s) agrees that all documentation and materials submitted with Qualifications will remain the property of the City and will become a public document.

5. The City reserves the right to request additional information from any and all prospective entities as deemed necessary by the City in order to evaluate the Qualifications. This process may not be used as an opportunity to submit missing documentation or to make substantive revisions to the original Qualifications.

6. The City reserves the right to reject any and all Qualifications and, in the event the Consultant selected, it may attempt to negotiate an agreement with the Consultant that, in the sole judgment of the City, is the best qualified to provide the services requested.

7. The City shall not enter into an agreement with any prospective Consultant(s) that has previously had an agreement with the City terminated, or that has previously been found to have violated any provision of the Seaside City Code, or related resolutions or ordinances, or any provision of federal law, state, or other local law.

8. The City reserves the right to enter into an agreement with an Consultant(s) at any time, deviate from this Request, reject any or all SOQs, continue to advertise for new Qualifications, negotiate with multiple entities simultaneously, waive any defects in Qualifications, or to proceed otherwise. The Request and the selection process will in no way be deemed to create a binding contract or agreement of any kind between the City and any prospective Consultant(s). The submission of Qualifications does not in any way commit the City to enter into an agreement with any prospective Consultant(s).

9. Each prospective Consultant(s) shall agree to abide by all federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations and to secure all necessary licenses, permits, and other forms of identification as may be required in connection with the resulting agreement, all at no additional cost to the City.

10. All Qualifications, charge rates or representations will remain in effect and be legally binding for at least one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of submission.

11. This Request for Qualifications shall be governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California and the jurisdiction of any disputes hereunder shall be had in Monterey County.

Packet Page 101
City of Seaside-Request for Qualifications
Traffic Engineering Services
- 6 -
Non‐Discrimination & Non‐Preferential Treatment
The successful Consultant shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, sex, color, age, religion, sexual orientation, actual or perceived gender identity, disability, ethnicity, or national origin, in connection with or related to the performance of City of Seaside contracts.

Grounds for Disqualification
All prospective entities are expected to conduct themselves with the utmost integrity and responsibility throughout the Request process. Any prospective Consultant(s) that violates these expectations, as determined in the sole discretion of the City, will be subject to disqualification.

Generally, the grounds for disqualification include:

1. Contact regarding this procurement with any City official or employee, other than the contact person designated in this Request, from the time of issuance of this Request until the consideration and approval of a professional services agreement.

2. Evidence of collusion, directly or indirectly, among prospective entities in regard to the amount, or the terms and conditions of this Request and the prospective agreement.

3. Influencing, or attempting to influence, any City staff member or official throughout the solicitation process, including the development of specifications beyond those included here, if any.

4. Evidence of submitting incorrect or inaccurate information in response to this Request or misrepresentation or failing to disclose facts during the evaluation or negotiation process.

5. Existence of any lawsuit, claim, or dispute between the prospective Consultant(s) and the City.

6. Evidence of the prospective Consultant(s)’s inability to successfully complete the responsibilities and obligations of the Request process.

7. The prospective Consultant(s)’s default under any City agreement or termination of a previous agreement.

Records and Financial Data
All correspondence with the City, including responses to this Request, will become the exclusive property of the City and will become public records under the California Public Records Act. All documents submitted in response to this Request will be subject to disclosure if requested by a member of the public. There are a very limited number of narrow exceptions to this disclosure requirement.

Personal financial information that a prospective Consultant(s) considers confidential, the disclosure of which would be an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, should be submitted in a sealed envelope marked “CONFIDENTIAL: PERSONAL FINANCIAL RECORDS; NOT PUBLIC RECORDS.” A prospective Consultant(s) should not mark their entire Qualifications as “Confidential.” During the selection process, the City will keep such information confidential and will not disclose it, except as otherwise required under applicable law. This means that, depending on the nature of timing of the request, or future court decisions, that personal financial Packet Page 102
City of Seaside-Request for Qualifications
Traffic Engineering Services
- 7 -
information may not remain private and may be publicly disclosed. Once the selection process is completed, the City will return this information to any prospective agency that is not selected.

If an Consultant(s) is selected, the City may retain any submitted information and disclose it to the City Council, and any subcommittees thereof, and the public in connection with consideration of an agreement with the City as evidence of the entities ability to carry out the development. Given the nature of the applicable law under the California Public Records Act, the City cannot guarantee or warrant that it will be able to keep submitted information, including personal financial records, confidential. The successful Consultant(s) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from and against any suit brought under the California Public Records Act to obtain the records; otherwise, the City shall not be obligated to defend such suit and may release the records.

Packet Page 103
RESOLUTION NO. 21-21

A RESOLUTION OF THE CFTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

APPROVING FEHR & PEERS, HARRISON ENGINEERING, KIMLEY HORN,

PARISI TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, AND RUGGERI JENSEN AZAR TO

PROVIDE ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
WHEREAS, Traffic Engineering Services included a vast array of specialties including transportation planning, traffic impact analysis, complete street design, traffic signal design, speed surveys, and peer review; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside, on occasion, is in need of consultants who specialize in traffic engineering; and
WHEREAS, on October 20, 2020, the City released a Request for Qualifications for professional services for Traffic Engineering Services; and WHEREAS, on November 16, 2020, proposals were received from six firms offering Traffic Engineering Services; and
WHEREAS, a selection panel reviewed and selected the five top firms: Fehr & Peers, Harrison Engineering, Kimley Horn, Parisi Transportation Consulting, and Ruggeri Jensen Azar as the most qualified to perform these services based on professional qualifications, similar experience and sufficient staffing capabilities to provide service in a timely manner.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Seaside hereby approves Fehr & Peers, Harrison Engineering, Kimley Horn, Parisi Transportation Consulting, and Ruggeri Jensen Azar, to provide Traffic Engineering Services on an as needed basis; and
Packet Page 104
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, approval to provide Traffic Engineering Services is for a period of three (3) years and may be extended at the City Manager's recommendation for two (2) one year extensions through March 18, 2026. Agreements will have a defined scope, schedule and fee arrangements that will be negotiated on a project by project basis.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular City Council meeting of the City of Seaside duly held on the 18th day of March, 2021 by the following vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Campbell, Garcia-Arrazola, Oglesby, Pacheco, Wizard NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
APPROVED:
lan N. Oglesby, F^yor
ATTEST:
><A-^
Dominique L. (&6vis, City Clerk
Packet Page 105

TRANSPORTATION(ONSUITING
Februory 1, 2023
City of Seaside
Attn: Nisha Patel, Leslie Llantero
440 Horcourt Avenue
Seoside, CA 93955
Subject: Parametrix Acquisition of Parisi and Assignment of Agreement Dear Nisha and Leslie:

I am excited and proud to onnounce that Parisi Transportation Consulting, Inc. is joining Parametrix, Inc. on Morch 1, 2023.

Parisi has ogreed to sell substantially all its assets to Parometrix, on engineering, plonning and environmental sciences firm with over 600 employee owners and wi+h offices throughout the Wes+ern United States (www.parametrix.com).

I will be joining Parametrix CISa Principal Consultant. Parisi's employees will be joining me at Porametrix to ensure Cl cohesive and seamless transition.

Our services and dedication to you will remciin the same. The sale to Parametrix will not affect the day-to-day operations of our business, or the completion of our work for you under the Agreements. We are excited about this opportunity and believe that joining wi+h Porametrix will provide numerous benefits and opportunities to our clienfs.

Below we outline the Agreements +hat we have with you. The Agreements are contemplated to be assigned to Parametrix in connec+ion with the closing of the sale on February 28, 2023 (the "Assignment"), and a review of the Agreements indicates thot your prior written consent may be required for the Assignment.

Therefore, we are requesting that, by signing below, you: (i) consent to the Assignment, ond (ii) acknowledge that neither the Assignment nor the Sale will affect the validity or enforceability of the Agreements, which shall remain in full force and effect Trom and after the effective date of the Sale as an agreement between you ond Parometrix.

We request that you indicate your consenf to the Assignmenf by signing below and emailing the signed document to both [email protected] and [email protected]. 58A A)+(l Visfo Avenue. Mill Valley CA 9494 )
www. pcirisi-associates.cor'n
Packet Page 106
Januory 31, 2023
Considering the time sensitivity, we thonk you in advance for your prompt attention to and approval of this matter.

Please note that all billings for services through February 28, 2023 will be provided by and be payable to Parisi. Billing for services as of Morch 1, 2023 will be provided by and be payable to Parometrix.

If you have ony questions, please do not hesita+e to reach ou+ +o me at (415) 649-6009.

Sincerely,
,==lDovid Parisi, Principal
Parisi Transportation Consulting, Inc
The Assignment of the following project(s), and the underlying contract(s), is hereby consented to and approved by the City of Seaside
Projects:
22017 SEASIDE - On-Call (Amendment 1 in process of being executed) 22055 SEASIDE - Ord Terrace School Safety Improvements
SEASIDE - Hilby Ave Traffic Calming (in process of being executed) By:

Page 2 ends

Packet Page 107

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.J.

TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Nisha Patel, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Kirstin van Gend, Administrative Analyst II
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL PROGRAM

COMPLIANCE REPORT IN SUPPORT OF PROJECTS FUNDED BY

MEASURE X AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE

REPORT TO THE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY
COUNTY

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution approving the annual compliance report in support of projects funded by Measure X and authorizing staff to submit the Report to the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) in order for the City to continue receiving the revenue generated from Measure X funds.

BACKGROUND
On November 8, 2016, the voters of Monterey County, approved Measure X on the Monterey County Ballot, thereby authorizing TAMC to impose and administer the proceeds from a three-eighths cent transaction and use tax (Measure X). Measure X is estimated to generate $600 million over 30 years for transportation improvements in Monterey County. Of that amount, $360 million (60%) will be distributed to the cities and the County for local projects, while the remaining $240 million (40%) is programmed to regional safety and mobility projects.

The duration of the Measure X sales tax will be 30 years from the initial year of collection, which began April 1, 2017, with said tax to terminate/expire on March 31, 2047. The tax proceeds will be used to pay for the programs and projects outlined in TAMC’s Transportation Safety and Investment Plan (the “Measure X Investment Plan”), as it may be amended.

Packet Page 108

Item No. 9.J. Page 2 of 3
As required in the Master Program Funding Agreement between TAMC and the City, the City must submit to TAMC an Annual Program Compliance Report (Attachment 2) by December 31st for each Fiscal Year the Measure X funds are in effect. Attachments required for the Annual Program Compliance Report are the Independent Audit of Financial Statements, Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Pavement Management Program Report, and Project Photos, as described below. • Independent Audit of Financial Statements – The Independent Audit of Financial Statements for Measure X Funds was completed on November 14, 2023.

• Measure X CIP - List of eligible transportation projects that are anticipated to be funded with the jurisdiction’s share of Measure X funds. Projects in the current Fiscal Year funded by Measure X are based upon the approved CIP and additional upcoming traffic calming projects. Subsequent projects identified in the remaining 4 years of the Measure X CIP include projects funded by Measure X and SB1. Specific street segments for pavement rehabilitation will be identified upon completion of the City's Pavement Management Program Update five year forecast.

• Pavement Management Program (PMP) Report - A letter confirming that the City's PMP Update conforms to the criteria established by TAMC.

• Project Photos - Before and after project photos from the reporting year. There were two projects that were funded with Measure X funds; Arterial & Collector Roadway Rehabilitation Project and Storm Drain Safe Grates.

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing staff to submit the Annual Program Compliance Report to the Transportation Agency of Monterey County.

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
This action is not defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3, Article 20, Section 15378 (b.4).

Evidence:

The proposed action is a government funding mechanism, not a project, and fiscal activities do not involve commitment to one specific project.

FISCAL IMPACT
Revenues generated from Measure X over the next 30 years is estimated to be $22 Packet Page 109

Item No. 9.J. Page 3 of 3
million for the City of Seaside for transportation improvements. Annual revenue to the City from Measure X is expected to be about $1,000,000.00. The proposed annual expenditures are less than the expected Measure X revenues. Therefore, there will be no fiscal impact to the City.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. 22-23_Annual Program Compliance Report
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 110
RESOLUTION NO. 23-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

APPROVING THE ANNUAL PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REPORT IN SUPPORT OF

PROJECTS FUNDED BY MEASURE X AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT REPORT TO THE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY.

WHEREAS, the Master Funding Agreement (Agreement) between the Transportation Authority for Monterey County (TAMC) and the City was approved by City Council on June 15, 2017 (Res 17-40); and
WHEREAS, the Annual Program Compliance Report, per the Agreement, is a document produced by the City which describes the efforts taken by the jurisdiction to comply with Measure X funding agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Independent Audit of Financial Statements, Attachment 1 of the Annual Program Compliance Report, is included in the Annual Report submitted to TAMC; and
WHEREAS, the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and the Pavement Management Program Report are included as Attachments 2 and 3 to the Annual Program Compliance Report; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement requires the submittal of an Annual Program Compliance Report by December 31st each year the Measure X funds are in effect; and WHEREAS, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3, Article 20, Section 15378 (b.4), this action is not defined as a project and is not subject to CEQA, as it is defined as a government funding mechanism.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside hereby authorizes staff to submit the Annual Program Compliance Report in support of the Measure X Program, to the Transportation Agency for Monterey County.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 7TH day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
________________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
Packet Page 111
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
Packet Page 112

Page 1 of 4 ends

THE CITY OF SEASIDE

MEASURE X ANNUAL PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023
The City of Seaside Annual Program Compliance Report presents the City’s efforts and actions taken during the fiscal year (FY) 2022/2023 on the programing and use of Measure X to fund local roadway rehabilitation projects within the City of Seaside.

The City of Seaside received a Bond of approximately $10,000,000 for improvements to various roadways as part of the Pavement Rehabilitation Project for both the design and construction elements. The Bond financing payments use Measure X Revenues, which are included in the Measure X Revenues in the table below. The expenditures that utilize the Bond supported funds are also included in the table below, however they are expended in a different fund and are not included in the Fund Balance Totals.

The revenue earned in FY22/23 that was not expended by the end of the Fiscal Year will be carried over and applied to the projects programmed for FY23/24.

CITY OF SEASIDE - FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 BALANCE SHEET

REVENUES
Carryover from Previous Year* $ 1,871,556.77
Measure X Prior Year Adjustment ($ 533.72)
Measure X Revenues $ 1,273,993.00
Earning on Interest $ 29,738.84
TOTAL REVENUES: $ 3,174,754.89
EXPENDITURES – MEASURE X
FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation (Construction) $ 699,557.27 FY 2022/2023 Pavement Rehabilitation (Design) $ 15,110.00 Traffic Calming – Hilby Avenue (Design) $ 613.28
Ord Terrace Elementary School Crossing Improvements $ 76,036.17 School Area Speed Reduction Zones $ 96,250.12
Debt Service – Measure X Bond $ 643,071.92
Audit Fee $ 5,000.00
Central Service Charges $ 349.17
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: $ 1,505,987.93
EXPENDITURES – BOND SUPPORTED
FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation (Construction) $ 1,220,271.44 TOTAL BOND EXPENDITURES: $ 1,220,271.44
TOTAL EXPENDITURES (MSR X AND BOND): $ 2,7276,79.09
FUND BALANCE, END OF PERIOD (MSR X): $1,668,766.96
* FY 21/22 Audited Report
Packet Page 113

Page 2 of 4 ends

Project Details
Title: FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation
Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 22/23 included construction and construction management services for the FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation Project.

Several roadway segments from the previous pavement rehabilitation project (A&C Roadway Rehabilitation Project Phase 3) were removed from the project due to utility conflicts and Caltrans permitting delays. The roadway segments include the north and south portions of Fremont Boulevard, Kimball Avenue and Wheeler Street. The City incorporated citywide striping into the scope of the project and several locations of base repairs.

The project is funded through Measure X funds, Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funds, and Measure X supported Bond revenue.

Benefits: At the completion of the project, it is anticipated that the overall PCI of the arterial and collector network within the City will be improved. Base repairs on residential/local streets will improve drivability and the quality of the roadway, and alleviate further pavement deterioration.

Citywide striping improves safety for motorists and pedestrians and compliments the regulatory signage.

Phase: Construction
Title: FY 2022/2023 Pavement Rehabilitation
Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 22/23 included design of FY 2022/2023 Pavement Rehabilitation Project. The residential roadway segments include Flores Place, Flores Street, Grandview Street, Harding Street, Lincoln Street, and Waring Street.

The design began in June 2023. The project design and construction will be completed in FY 2023/2024. The scope of the work included base repairs, AC overlay, and accessibility improvements. The project is funded through Measure X and SB 1 funds.

Benefits: At the completion of the project, it is anticipated that the overall PCI of the residential roadway network within the City will be improved. Base repairs on residential/local streets will improve drivability and the quality of the roadway, and alleviate further pavement deterioration.

Phase: Design
Packet Page 114

Page 3 of 4 ends

Title: Traffic Calming – Hilby Avenue
Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 22/23 included preparation of a comprehensive traffic calming plan for Hilby Avenue from Wheeler Street to General Jim Moore Boulevard.

The final traffic calming plan was approved in the Fall of 2023 with design and construction scheduled for FY 23/24. The scope of the work included data collection, preparation of existing conditions map, development of a “toolkit” of potential traffic calming measures, an in-person community outreach workshop, and draft plan presentation to the Traffic Advisory Committee and City Council for final approval. The project is funded through Measure X and SB 1 funds.

Benefits: Hilby Avenue is minor arterial roadway in the City which was found to have high rates of speeding and collisions. Construction of traffic calming measure along Hilby Avenue will reduce speeds and collisions and resulting in safety gains for the community.

Phase: Design
Title: Ord Terrace Elementary School Crossing Improvement (Traffic Calming)
Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 22/23 included the design and construction of traffic calming at Ord Terrace Elementary School (School). The School experiences heavy traffic congestion during the morning and afternoon drop off and pick up periods along with observed parking violations.

The design was complete in FY 22/23 and construction was completed in September 2023. The scope of the work included construction of a curb extension and median, an accessible curb ramp, a school crosswalk with Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon, and striping. The project is funded through Measure X funds and SB 1 funds.

Benefits: The traffic calming improvements resulted in a safe crossing for students while minimizing pedestrian-vehicle conflicts.

Phase: Design and partial construction
Packet Page 115

Page 4 of 4 ends

Title: School Area Speed Reduction Zones (Traffic Calming) Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 22/23 included design and installation of the reduced speed limit signs in school zones. The project included installation of 25 mph and 20 mph school speed limits within the school zones of 14 schools within the city.

The installation was completed in April 2023. The scope of the work included furnishing of all labor, materials, equipment, and services necessary for, and reasonably incidental to replacing, removing, and installing signs in the identified school zones within the city. The project is funded through Measure X funds.

Benefits: Unsafe speed is a primary collision factor for many streets within the City and reducing speeds within school zones results in large safety gains for children, who are more vulnerable and lack critical perception and ability to process information.

Phase: Design and installation
List of Attachments
The following Attachments are included in the Annual Program Compliance Report:

ATTACHMENT 1: Annual Independent Audit
ATTACHMENT 2: Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
ATTACHMENT 3: Pavement Management Program Report
ATTACHMENT 4: Project Photos
Packet Page 116
ATTACHMENT 1:

Annual Independent Audit
Packet Page 117

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND

INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORTS

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2023
Packet Page 118
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
Packet Page 119

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Independent Auditor’s Report ............................................................................................................. 1 Basic Financial Statements:

Balance Sheet .................................................................................................................................. 3 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance .......................................... 4 Notes to the Financial Statements ................................................................................................... 5 Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance with TAMC Ordinance No 2016-01 – Transportation Safety and Investment Plan (TAMC PLAN) ........................................................... 7 Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ................................................. 11 Packet Page 120
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
Packet Page 121
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Honorable Members of the City Council
City of Seaside, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the City of Seaside, California(City) Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund (Fund) as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Fund’s basic financial statements as listed in the Table of Contents.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of June 30, 2023, and the changes in financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirement relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.

In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, we:
1 Packet Page 122
• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit.

Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Fund and do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the City of Seaside, as of June 30, 2023 or the changes in its financial position for the fiscal year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.

Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated November 13, 2023, on our consideration of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance.

That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.

Pleasant Hill, California
November 13, 2023
2 Packet Page 123

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND

BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2023
ASSETS
Cash and Investments 1,337,713 $
Accounts Receivable 331,055
Total Assets $ 1,668,768

FUND BALANCES
Restricted $ 1,668,768
Total Fund Balances $ 1,668,768
See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements

3 Packet Page 124

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023

REVENUES
Transportation Safety Taxes 1,273,993 $
Interest Revenue 29,739
Total Revenues 1,303,732

EXPENDITURES
Transfers to City of Seaside for Bond payment and capital projects 1,501,172 Reporting and Implementation 5,349
Total Expenditures 1,506,521

EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (202,789)
Fund Balances - Beginning of Year 1,871,557
FUND BALANCES - END OF YEAR $ 1,668,768
See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements
4 Packet Page 125

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The financial statements of the City of Seaside Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units (GAAP). The Activities' reporting entity applies all relevant Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) pronouncements.

Reporting Entity
The City of Seaside receives Measure X funding from the Transportation Agency of Monterey County for the purpose of street and road infrastructure improvements. In addition, Measure X funds can be utilized to match grants, loans, programs, and pay annual debt service to fund eligible approved bonds for local road maintenance or safety projects. The financial statements present only the City of Seaside Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund and do not purport to, and do not present, the City's financial position and changes in financial position. The City of Seaside's basic financial statements are available from the City's website at http://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/190/Budget-Financial-Statements.

Basis of Accounting
The accounting and financial reporting treatment applied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus.

The City of Seaside Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund is presented as a governmental fund type. Governmental funds are accounted for using a current financial resources measurement focus. The application of this measurement focus provides that, in general, only current assets and current liabilities are present on the balance sheet. Operating statements of these funds present revenues and expenditures.

The modified accrual basis of accounting is used for all governmental funds. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when they become susceptible to accrual (i.e., both measurable and available). Measurable means that the amount of the transaction can be determined.

Available means the funds are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. For Measure X Funds, the City considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 120 days of the end of the current fiscal period, in order to capture all revenues related to the current fiscal year.

Expenditures of governmental funds are generally recognized when the related fund liability is incurred.

NOTE 2 – CASH DEPOSITS
The City follows the practice of pooling cash and investments for all funds under its direct daily control.

Interest earned on pooled cash and investments is allocated periodically to the various funds based on average cash balances. Detailed disclosure regarding the City's investments of cash is included in the the City of Seaside basic financial statements.

5 Packet Page 126

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 3 – MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT
The Measure X Master Programs Funding Agreement between the City of Seaside and the Transportation Agency of Monterey County, as amended, requires that the City must expend each fiscal year from its general fund for street and highway purposes an amount not less than the annual average of its expenditures from its general fund during the 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 fiscal years, but not less than what was expended in 2016-17 (when Measure X passed), as reported to the State of California Controller pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 2151 ("Maintenance of Effort"). This baseline amount will be indexed annually to the Engineering News Record construction index.

Maintenance of Effort: $735,213
Total expenditures from the general fund for street and highway purposes for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 was $847,029. The City was in compliance with the Maintenance of Effort requirement of the Measure X Master Programs Funding Agreement between the City of Seaside and the Transportation Agency for Monterey County.
6 Packet Page 127
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON
COMPLIANCE WITH TAMC ORDINANCE NO. 2016-01

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN (TAMC PLAN)
To the Honorable Members of the City Council
City of Seaside, California
Report on Compliance for TAMC PLAN
Opinion on Compliance for TAMC Plan
We have audited the City of Seaside, California (City) Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund’s (Fund) compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants specified in the Transportation Agency for Monterey County's (TAMC) Ordinance No. 2016-01 Transportation Safety and Investment Plan (TAMC Plan)) and in the Measure X Master Programs Funding Agreement between TAMC and the City (Measure X Agreement) that could have a direct and material effect on the Fund for the year ended June 30, 2023.

In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on the Fund for the year ended June 30, 2023.

Basis for Opinion on the TAMC Plan
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS); the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (Government Auditing Standards), and requirements specified in the Funding Agreement. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our report.

We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for the TAMC Plan. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.

Responsibilities of Management for Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the TAMC Plan.
7 Packet Page 128
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the City’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards and requirements specified in the Funding Agreement will always detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the City’s compliance with the requirements of the TAMC Plan as a whole.

In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards and the Funding Agreement, we:
• exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the City’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
• obtain an understanding of the City’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the requirements referred to above, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.

Report on Internal Control Over Compliance
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

8 Packet Page 129
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not identified.

Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.

The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements, specified in TAMC Ordinance and Measure X Agreement. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.

Pleasant Hill, California
November 13, 2023
9 Packet Page 130
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
Packet Page 131
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS

BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED

IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
To the Honorable Members of the City Council
City of Seaside, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the basic financial statements of the City of Seaside, California (City) Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund (Fund) as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, and the related notes to the financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated November 13, 2023.

Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Fund’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that have not been identified.

Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Fund’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 11 Packet Page 132
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Fund’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.

Pleasant Hill, California
November 13, 2023
12 Packet Page 133
ATTACHMENT 2:

Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
Packet Page 134
CITY of SEASIDE Attachment 2

MEASURE X FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023/24– 2027/28

Page 1 of 2 ends

YEAR 1 (FY23/24)
YEAR 2 (FY24/25)
Project Description & Phase Total Cost Measure X PCI
FY 21/22
Pavement
Rehabilitation
(Carry over)
Construction - Surface Seal
portions of Fremont Blvd., Full
Depth HMA on Kimball Ave.
and Wheeler Street, several
locations of base repairs, and
street striping (striping review)
$2,287,383 $61,720 <50
FY 22/23
Pavement
Rehabilitation
(Carry over)
Design & Construction -
Residential Road Rehabilitation
on Grandview St., Flores St.,
Flores Pl., Lincoln St., Villa
Nova Ct., Velerton Ct. Harding
St., Yosemite St., and Waring St.
$2,400,000 $572,486 <60
FY 23/24
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Design & Construction:

Rehabilitate deteriorated
roadway sections within the City
$1,000,000 $500,000 <50
Ord Terrace
Elementary
School Traffic
Safety
Improvements
(Carry Over)
Construction – Rectangle rapid
flashing beacon off set cross
walk and corresponding signage
and pavement marking on La
Salle Avenue
$263,342.80 $8,326.70 NA
Hilby Avenue
Traffic
Calming
(Carry Over)
Design & Construction – traffic
calming measure on Hilby
Avenue from Wheeler St to
General Jim Moore Blvd.
$520,702 $405,000 NA
San Pablo
Traffic
Calming
Design & Construction – traffic
calming measures on San Pablo
from Mescal St to General Jim
Moore Blvd.
$235,000 $135,000 NA
Totals: $6,706,428 $1,682,533
Project Description & Phase Total Cost Measure X PCI
FY 24/25
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Design & Construction:

Complete residential street
reconstruction.
$1,000,000 $500,000 <20
Totals: $1,000,000 $500,000
Packet Page 135
CITY of SEASIDE

MEASURE X FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FOR YEARS 2024/25– 2027/28
S:\CIP\Active Projects\Measure X\Funding and Reporting\FY2022-23 Report to TAMC\5Yr CIP\DRAFT_Attachment 2_Five-Year CIP_LBL.docx YEAR 3 (FY 25/26)
YEAR 4 (FY 26/27)
Project Description & Phase Total Cost Measure X PCI
FY 26/27
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Design & Construction:

Rehabilitate deteriorated
roadway sections within the City
$1,000,000 $300,000 <60
Totals: $1,000,000 $300,000
YEAR 5 (FY 27/28)
Project Description & Phase Total Cost Measure X
(BOND)
PCI
FY 27/28
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Design & Construction:

Rehabilitate deteriorated
roadway sections within the City
$1,000,000 $300,000 <60
Totals: $1,000,000 $300,000
DEFINITIONS OF REQUESTED INFORMATION:

1. Project: The title of the project to receive Measure X funding.

2. Description & Phase: A general description of the project and the phase (e.g. Environmental; Design; Right-of-Way; or Construction) that will be funded in the given year.

3. Total Cost: The total cost of the project.

4. Measure X: The amount of Measure X funding that will be expended on the project.

5. PCI: The Pavement Condition Index for the roadway, from the local jurisdiction’s Pavement Management Program.

Project Description & Phase Total Cost Measure X PCI
FY 25/26
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Design & Construction:

Rehabilitate deteriorated
roadway sections within the City
$1,000,000 $300,000 <60
Totals: $1,000,000 $300,000
Packet Page 136
ATTACHMENT 3:

Pavement Management Program Report
Packet Page 137
Packet Page 138
Packet Page 139
ATTACHMENT 4:

Project Photos
Packet Page 140
Attachment 4
FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation
Kimball Avenue
Before

After Photos

Packet Page 141
Attachment 4
Kimball Avenue at Wheeler Street
During
Packet Page 142
Attachment 4
Wheeler Street
Before
After
Packet Page 143
Attachment 4
Harcourt Avenue
Before
After
Packet Page 144
Attachment 4

ORD TERRACE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS
Before

After

Packet Page 145
Attachment 4

SCHOOL AREA SPEED REDUCTION ZONES
Dual Language Academy of Monterey Peninsula (Sonoma Avenue & Yosemite Street) BEFORE
AFTER
Packet Page 146
Attachment 4
Monterey Bay Christian School (Hilby Avenue)

BEFORE -
AFTER
Packet Page 147

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.K.

TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Dominique Davis, City Clerk
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE ANNUAL CITY
COUNCIL OUTSIDE ASSIGNMENTS FOR JANUARY 1, 2023 TO
DECEMBER 31, 2023

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution modifying the City Council outside agency assignments to appoint Mayor Oglesby as the primary representative for the Monterey County Mosquito Abatement District, and Mayor Pro Tem Pacheco as the alternate representative for the same; and appoint Council Member Garcia-Arrazola as the primary representative for ReGen Monterey, and Council Member Miller as the alternate representative for the same.

BACKGROUND
In addition to the duties on the City Council, the Mayor and Council members serve as the City’s representatives to outside agencies. City of Seaside participation in regional bodies and internal committees enables us to work toward achieving the City's strategic goals. City staff may serve as alternates to some outside agencies or as the City’s representative on the agency or subcommittee.

The modifications to the January 1 - December 31, 2023, outside agency assignments are due to the term expiration for former Council member Jason Campbell on the Mosquito Abatement District Board and his resignation from the ReGen Monterey Board effective January 1, 2024.

Mayor Ian Oglesby is being designated as the primary representative for the Mosquito Abatement District Board, and Mayor Pro Tem Dave Pacheco as the the alternate.

Council member Alexis Garcia-Arrazola is being designated as the primary representative for ReGen Monterey, and Council member Alex Miller as the alternate.

Packet Page 148

Item No. 9.K. Page 2 of 2

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Modified 2023 Outside agency assignments Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 149
Meeting Date: 12/07/23
Item #: 9.I.

RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

APPROVING THE MODIFICATION OF THE ANNUAL APPOINTMENTS TO LOCAL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS FOR JANUARY 1, 2023, TO DECEMBER 31, 2023 WHEREAS, annually, the Mayor considers City Council Member assignments to various commissions, boards, committees in special districts and organizations, joint powers authorities, and other agencies; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Oglesby considered the necessary annual appointments made recommendations for City Council member assignments to the various commissions, boards and committees in special districts and organizations, joint powers authorities and other agencies for January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023; and WHEREAS, the modifications to the January 1 - December 31, 2023, outside agency assignments are due to the term expiration for former Council member Jason Campbell on the Mosquito Abatement District Board, and his resignation from the ReGen Monterey Board effective January 1, 2024; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Seaside does hereby approve Mayor Oglesby’s recommendations for City Council Member assignments to various outside commissions, committees, and boards as listed in Exhibit A.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 7th day of December 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
APPROVED:
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 150

SEASIDE CITY COUNCIL MEMBER LOCAL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS January 1, 2023 –December 31, 2023 (Modifications Highlighted in Yellow)

Item Committee Representative Alternate Date/Time

1. 1
0 Seaside Groundwater Basin Watermaster Mayor Oglesby Mayor Pro Tem Pacheco 1 st Wednesday, 2 p.m.

2. 2 Monterey-Salinas
Transit District (MST) Mayor Pro Tem Pacheco Council Member GarciaArrazola 2 nd Monday, 10 a.m.

3. Monterey One Water Council Member GarciaArrazola Mayor Oglesby Last Monday, 7 p.m.

4. 9 North Salinas Mosquito Abatement District Jason Campbell Mayor Oglesby
Mayor Oglesby
Mayor Pro Tem Pacheco 2
nd Tuesday, 12 noon

5. 7 Seaside County Sanitation District Mayor Oglesby Mayor Pro Tem Pacheco 2 nd Tuesday, 9:30 a.m.

6. 1 Association of Monterey Bay Area
Governments (AMBAG) Council Member Miller Council Member Burks 2 nd Wednesday, 7 p.m.

7. 6 ReGen Monterey (Waste Management) Jason Campbell
Council Member Garcia-Arrazola
Council Member Garcia-Arrazola
Council Member Miller 3
rd Friday, 9 a.m.

8. Monterey Peninsula Water Management
District (MPWMD):

Policy Advisory Committee
Current Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Called

9. 1
5 Access Monterey Peninsula Board Council Member Burks Council Member Miller 3 rd Monday at 5:00 p.m.

10. 5 Community Human Services of Monterey
County JPA
Council Member GarciaArrazola Council Member Miller 3
rd Thursday, 11:30 a.m.

11. 1
1 Traffic Advisory Committee Mayor Pro Tem Pacheco Council Member Burks 3 rd Tuesday, 5:00 p.m.

12. 3 Transportation Agency of Monterey County
(TAMC) Mayor Oglesby Mayor Pro Tem Pacheco 4
th Wednesday, 9 a.m.

13. 8
Monterey Peninsula Unified School District
(MPUSD) & City of Seaside Trustees and City
Council Collaboration
Mayor Oglesby
Mayor Pro Tem Pacheco MPUSD Trustees Called

14. 1
2 Laguna Grande Joint Powers Authority Mayor Pro Tem Pacheco Council Member Miller Called

15. 1
3 California Joint Powers Insurance Group Council Member Miller Council Member Burks Called

16. 1
4 Homeless Leadership Council Mayor Oglesby Council Member GarciaArrazola Called

17. Seaside Housing Non-Profit Cooperation Mayor & City Manager n/a TBD ATTEST: Per Resolution No. 23-XX ________________________________________ Packet Page 151

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.L.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS &

ASSOCIATES FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE FY 2021/2022

PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT
TO EXCEED $61,720.00.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution authorizing an amendment to the professional services agreement with Harris & Associates for additional construction management and inspection services for the FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation Project for an amount not to exceed $61,720.00.

BACKGROUND
Staff retained Harris to complete a bid package and construction management and inspection services for the paving project entitled FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project) on July 6, 2021. The Project includes the pavement rehabilitation of Kimball Avenue from Fremont Boulevard to Wheeler Street and Wheeler Street from Hilby Avenue to Kimball Street with foamed full depth reclamation (FDR), microsurface of the northern and southern portions of Fremont Boulevard, and base repairs at several locations throughout the City and street restriping. On September 15, 2022, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Granite Rock and approved an amendment with Harris for design services during construction, additional construction management and inspection services for street restriping for the FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation Project.

The bid documents specified that the contractor had 65 working days to complete the Packet Page 152

Item No. 9.L. Page 2 of 2
work. During those 65 days, the contractor was to concurrently work on road reconstruction and striping throughout the City. This implied that the Harris construction management and inspection staff would split the working hours between the road reconstruction phase and the striping phase on a daily basis. Due to the inclement weather, the City authorized the street restriping portion of the work to be suspended until more favorable weather. Suspending the street striping ultimately elongated the construction management and inspection services needed by Harris. The road reconstruction phase spanned from October 24, 2022 through February 3, 2023 (65 working days). The street striping work was performed by the contractor from April 10, 2023 to July 27, 2023. This required Harris to work an additional 59 working days.

There was additional effort required from the construction management team to manage the project, contractor, and close out the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The approved Project budget was $2,287,640.45 for construction and construction management and inspection services. Due to the high striping bid quantities versus the actual striping quantities installed, the total construction costs produced a savings in the amount of $298,371.89. With the cost of the additional construction management and inspection services in the amount of $61,720.00, there will be a total project savings in the amount of $236,651.89.

The Project is funded by Measure X and SB1 paid out of account No. 212-8920-9600, and there is sufficient budget in the account to fund the amendment.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. PSA Amendment
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 153
RESOLUTION NO. 23-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS & ASSOCIATES FOR ADDITIONAL

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTIONS SERVICES FOR THE FY 2021/2022 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $61,720.00
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside owns and maintains some of the pubic roadways within the city limits; and
WHEREAS, Harris & Associates was retained to prepare construction documents for the next paving project, entitled FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project), which includes pavement rehabilitation on Kimball Avenue and Wheeler Street with foamed full depth reclamation (FDR), micro surface of the northern and southern portions of Fremont Boulevard, base repairs at several locations in the City, and street restriping; and WHEREAS, Harris & Associates provided a proposal, dated September 6, 2022, to provide design services during construction, construction management, and inspection services for the restriping portion of the Project; and WHEREAS, on September 15, 2022 the City Council awarded a construction contract to Granite Rock and approved an amendment with Harris for design services during construction, additional construction management and inspection services for street restriping for the FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation Project; and WHEREAS, the bid documents specified that the contractor had 65 working days to complete the work and the contractor was to concurrently work on road reconstruction and striping; and
WHEREAS, due to the inclement weather, the City authorized the street restriping portion of the work to be suspended until more favorable weather; and WHEREAS, suspending the street striping ultimately elongated the construction management and inspection services needed by Harris; and WHEREAS, the street striping work required Harris & Associates to work an additional 59 working days plus additional effort required from the construction management team to manage the project, contractor, and close out the project; and WHEREAS, the cost of the additional construction management and inspection services is in the amount of $61,720.00; and
Packet Page 154
WHEREAS, the Project is funded by Measure X and SB1 paid out of 212-8920- 9600 where there are sufficient funds to fund the amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside authorizes the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Harris & Associates for an amount not to exceed $61,720.00 for additional construction management and inspection services for the FY 2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 7th day of December 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
________________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
_________________________________
Sheri Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 155
CONTRACT AMENDMENT #ll

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
City of Seaside
Date: December 7, 2023 Change Requested by: 3 City/District Consultant Contract Date Project Name
11/2/2018 Pavement Desi Services
To (Consultant): Harris & Associates, Inc. 450 Lincoln Ave. Suite 103, Salinas, CA 93901 You are directed to make the following changes to the Contract Documents or amend the following described work not included in the contract documents for this project.

The purpose oftis addendumis to provide additional professional services relatedto theprojectnamed above. The contract terrns and conditions shall not be modified except for as stated herein.

MODIFY the following text in Section 2, "Services."
Consultant shall perfon'n the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9 and AIO attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit E, Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9 and Al O.

MODIFY the following text in Section 22, "Contents of Request for Proposal and Proposal." Consultant is bound by the contents of City's Request for Proposal, Exhibit "D" hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and the contents of the proposal submitted by the Consultant, Exhibit E, Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9 and AIO attached hereto.

Original Contract
Amount
Previous CCO Total (Not
including this Amendment)
This Amendment
Total
Revised Contract
Amount
$1,058,180.00 $1,020,442.00 $61,720.00 $2,140,342.00
Original Contract
Time
Original Completion Date
Days To Date
(Including This
Amendment)
Revised
Completion Date
44 Months June, 30, 2022 2,067 . June, 30, 2024
STTED
\/l ha_,
Nisha Patel
PW Director/ City Engi_neer IL-3o-13
' - SJre N Name and Title Date
CITY APPROVAL BY:

Jaime M. Fontes
City Manager
Signature Name and Title Date
CONSULTANT ACCEPTANCE BY:
f-J3. lFrank S. Lopez
Vice President, Engineering Consulting November 21, 2023 Signature a ' Name and Title Date

Page 1 ends

Packet Page 156
450 Lincoln Avenue, Suite 103, Salinas, CA 93901  (831) 789-8667  WeAreHarris.com November 8, 2023
Leslie Llantero
Associate Engineer
City of Seaside
440 Harcourt Drive
Seaside, CA 93955
Amendment #11 – Construction Management and Inspection Services for the FY 2021-2022 Seaside Pavement Rehabilitation Project
Dear Leslie,
Harris & Associates (Harris) is presenting Addendum #11 which includes additional Construction Management Services for the FY 2021-2022 Seaside Pavement Rehabilitation.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
On July 12, 2021, Harris got into contract with City of Seaside to perform work associated with the FY 2021- 2022 Seaside Pavement Rehabilitation Project.

The scope of work and fee is reflected in Amendment #6 and is also summarized below:

1. Engineering Design Services, Construction Management Services, and Inspection Services for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation of various streets consisting of the following:
a. Base failure repair (digouts) at 28 different locations identified by City staff. b. Slurry Seal maintenance treatment and digouts on Fremont Boulevard for approximately 1,000 LF between southern City Limits and Kimball Avenue. c. Slurry Seal maintenance treatment and digouts on Fremont Boulevard for approximately 500 LF between Del Monte Boulevard and the intersection with Highway 1 off ramp. d. Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) on Kimball Avenue for approximately 1,300 LF between Fremont Boulevard and Wheeler Street.
e. Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) on Wheeler Street for approximately 1,000 LF between Kimball Avenue and Hilby Avenue.

On November 4, 2021, Harris submitted Amendment #7 to City of Seaside for additional Engineering Design Services for Striping Improvements throughout the City. Amendment #7 did not include Construction Management and Inspections Services for the Striping Phase.

The scope of work and fee is reflected in Amendment #7 and is also summarized below:

1. Performing an inventory assessment for the roadway striping throughout the City.

2. Engineering Design Services for striping improvements throughout the City based on the field work field work analysis.

Packet Page 157
Harris & Associates, Inc.  Amendment #11 – Construction Management and Inspection Services for the FY 2021-2022 Seaside Pavement Rehabilitation Project 2 of 3
On September 7, 2022, Harris submitted Amendment #9 to City of Seaside to perform additional Engineering Design Services, Construction Management Services, and Inspection Services.

The scope of work and fee is reflected in Amendment #9 and is also summarized below:

1. Construction Management and Inspection Services for striping effort identified in Amendment #7.

The FY 2021-2022 Seaside Pavement Rehabilitation Project identified in Amendment #6 & Amendment #7 was awarded on September 15, 2022. The bid documents specified that the contractor had 65 working days to complete the work. During these 65 days, the contractor was to concurrently work on road reconstruction and striping throughout the City. This implied that the Harris Construction Management and Inspection Staff would split the working hours between the road reconstruction phase and the striping phase only a daily basis. The contractor did not perform the road reconstruction work and striping work concurrently which ultimately elongated the Construction Management and Inspection services needed from Harris. The road reconstruction phase spanned from October 24, 2022, through February 3, 2023 (65 working days). The striping worked was performed by the contractor from April 10, 2023, to July 27, 2023. This required the Harris Inspectors to work an additional 59 days (4 hours per day). Additionally, there was additional effort required from Construction Management Team to manage the project, contractor, and close out the project.

The Harris fee for this work is showed in Attachment 1.

SCOPE OF WORK
The following outlines the scope of work and effort required by the Construction Management Team for the additional 59 working days. Please note that our effort will be billed on a Time and Materials basis, not to exceed the budgeted amount without prior approval.

TASK 3001 – CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
TASK 3001.1 –CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Manage project during construction and serve as project lead. Duties include the following:
a. Supervise project staff and assign inspection needs as necessary. b. Verification of Pay Quantities and Quantity Reviews. c. Review of Change Orders Backup Documents.
d. Frequent Site Visits to oversee inspectors, resolve conflicts in the field and observe critical activities. e. Draft Change Orders.
f. Monitor Site Safety.
g. Reviews and Responds to Submittals and RFI’s. Will forward to City Project Manager any nontechnical submittals requiring City approval. h. Preparation and Distribution of WSWD.
i. Compiles and Organizes Inspector Daily Reports.
j. Prepared Punch List and coordinates its completion/sign off. k. Works with inspector to resolve issues in the field with field changes. Coordinate with the City as needed to resolve.
l. Responsible for complete As-built records.
m. Review T&M Extra Work Bills.
n. Assists with Project Closeout including redline review, document turnover and miscellaneous forms to certify materials and budget.

Packet Page 158
Harris & Associates, Inc.  Amendment #11 – Construction Management and Inspection Services for the FY 2021-2022 Seaside Pavement Rehabilitation Project 3 of 3
TASK 3001.2 – AS-BUILT DRAWINGS
Harris to prepare “As-built” drawings based on the field notes prepared by the project Inspector and Project Construction Manager. “As-built” drawings to be submitted to City of Seaside for their records.

TASK 3002 – INSPECTION (PREVAILING WAGE)
TASK 3002.1 – INSPECTION (PREVAILING WAGE)
Prepare inspection of contractors as dictated by approved plans and specifications. Prepare daily inspection reports to support work performed by contractor and measurement and tracking of quantities of work completed.

Harris performed additional 59 working days of inspection at a rate of 4 hours per day.

SCHEDULE
The construction of the project has already been completed.

FEE ESTIMATE
The not to exceed time and materials cost estimate for performing the tasks described above is $61,720. A detailed level of effort is provided in Attachment 1.

Please feel free to contact me directly should you have any questions regarding this scope of work and cost estimate.

Sincerely,
Harris & Associates, Inc. Harris & Associates, Inc.

Frank S. Lopez, PE, QSD Christian Mercado
Vice President, Engineering & Consulting Project Manager, Engineering & Consulting (831) 233-9242 (831) 713-6403
[email protected] [email protected] Attachment 1 – Fee Estimate
Packet Page 159
Harris & Associates Subtotals
Construction
Manager
Inspection
(PW)
Project
Manager
Project
Engineer
Task/Subtask $200.00 $195.00 $185.00 $135.00
Task 3001 Construction Management
3001.1 Construction Management 40 0 8 0 $9,480
3001.2 As-Built Drawings 0 0 8 24 $4,720
Subtotal Hours = 40 0 16 24 80
Task 3001 Subtotal ($) = $8,000 $0 $2,960 $3,240 $14,200 Task 3002 Inspection (Prevailing Wage)
3002.1 Inspection (Prevailing Wage) 0 236 0 0 $46,020
Subtotal Hours = 0 236 0 0 236
Task 3002 Subtotal ($) = $0 $46,020 $0 $0 $46,020
$60,220
Total Hours by Classification = 40 236 16 24 316
Total ($) by Classification = $8,000 $46,020 $2,960 $3,240 $60,220 Direct Expenses $1,500
Total ($) = $61,720
$61,720
1 Project "FY2021/2022 Pavement Rehabilitation Project" allocated 65 working days to the contractor. 2 Amendment 12 includes additional 59 working days from April 10, 2023 to July 27, 2023. 3 Task 3001.1 Construction Management assumes 20 working days (4 hours per day) 4 Task 3002.1 Inspection (Prevailing Wage) assumes 59 working days (4 hours per day) City of Seaside
Amendment #11 – Construction Management Services
for the Seaside Roadway Rehabilitation Project

FEE ESTIMATE
Construction Management Services
Total Construction Management Services=
$61,720
Total =
$1,500
Exhibit 1-Fee-Amend #11.xlsx
Packet Page 160

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 10.A.

TO: City Council
FROM: Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
BY: Alexia Rapoport, Housing Program Manager
DATE: December 7, 2023
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA-23-02: ADOPT A

RESOLUTION AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING
THE 6TH CYCLE (2023-2031) DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
(EXEMPT FROM CEQA)

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment (GPA) 23-02 and adopting the City of Seaside 6th Cycle (2023-2031) Draft Housing Element.

BACKGROUND
The Housing Element analyzes and addresses a local government’s housing needs within an eight-year period referred to as a “Housing Element Cycle.” The City of Seaside is currently in its 5th Housing Element Cycle (2015-2023), with efforts underway to prepare and adopt its 6th Cycle Housing Element (December 14, 2023- December 14, 2031).

The Housing Element carries unique statutory requirements related to its drafting and adoption. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65580, et. Seq., each Council of Governments (COG) and the California Department of Housing and Community (HCD) determine and allocate each local government with a “Regional Housing Needs Assessment” (RHNA). A local government’s RHNA is a total number of new housing units, across various income levels, that must be accounted for during the Housing Element Cycle. On October 2022, the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG), the COG whose jurisdiction includes the City of Seaside, allocated the City a total RHNA of 616 total units. More specifically, the City of Seaside’s RHNA consists of the following:
• 86 Very Low Income Units
Packet Page 161

Item No. 10.A. Page 2 of 4
• 55 Low Income Units
• 156 Moderate Income Units
• 319 Above Moderate Income Units
Local governments are not responsible for directly creating the housing units outlined in their RHNA; however, they are responsible for creating conditions that facilitate their creation. The Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element (Attachment 2) outlines the City’s plans to fulfill its RHNA through various policies and programs. As required, the Housing Element also includes a list of sites suitable for housing development, referred to as the “Inventory of Sites.” This inventory can be found on App-80 in the Draft Technical Appendix (Attachment 3). An overview of present and future programs that the City will implement to advance housing equity can be found in the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) section. A summary of past accomplishments during the 5th Housing Element Cycle can be found in the Review of Past Accomplishments Section.

The City is currently undergoing a comprehensive General Plan update, with completion anticipated for early 2024. The Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element is consistent with both the current and proposed General Plan. No sites are proposed to be rezoned in order to meet Housing Element goals; rather, the Draft accounts for the City’s RHNA via previously approved housing developments and infill sites (Inventory of Sites) subject to present zoning. RHNA capacity has been analyzed under both the current and proposed General Plans. Upon the General Plan Update’s anticipated adoption, the City will review and revise the Housing Element as appropriate and necessary to maintain internal consistency with the General Plan.

Timeline & Outreach Efforts
California Housing Element Law dictates the process by which local governments update and adopt their housing elements. The first draft of the updated Housing Element must go through an initial public comment period of 30 days. After the public comment period, the City must take at least ten days to review and integrate public comments before submitting the draft to HCD. Any subsequent drafts to address feedback from HCD are required to be publicly posted for at least seven days before resubmitting to HCD. The City must adopt an updated Housing Element that is certified by HCD by December 14, 2023. Consequences of not adopting a compliant Housing Element by the statutory deadline include ineligibility for various state grants, loss of permitting authority, and loss of local control of land use approvals for certain housing developments.

The City began preparing its General Plan update, which includes the Housing Element, in 2015. Pursuant to Housing Element Law, the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element was made available for review and public comment from May 19, 2023 through June 26, 2023. City staff conducted concerted community engagement prior to and during the public comment period. Community engagement actions to-date include:

Packet Page 162

Item No. 10.A. Page 3 of 4
• Presentation to the Seaside Planning Commission in 2018; and • Stakeholder Focus Groups throughout 2022; and
• Housing Element Overview to Seaside City Council May 18, 2023; and • Housing Element Overview to Seaside Homeless Commission May 23, 2023; and • Tabling (bilingual) at Seaside Farmers Market June 15, 2023; and • Virtual Community Workshop (bilingual) June 20, 2023; and • Housing Element Overview to Seaside Housing Collaborative June 21, 2023; and • Housing Element Overview to Seaside Planning Commission June 21, 2023; and • In-Person Community Workshop (bilingual) June 22, 2023.

Additionally, City Staff conducted targeted outreach via local community-based organizations, religious institutions, educational institutions, and other community partners. Following the conclusion of the initial public comment period, public comments received were addressed and integrated as appropriate. On June 27, 2023, City Staff led a small delegation of HCD Housing Element reviewers through a tour of key housing project and sites identified in the Draft’s “Sites Inventory.” The Draft was submitted to HCD for review on July 21, 2023. On October 23, 2023, the Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) considered the Draft Housing Element.

The ALUC unanimously voted to adopt a resolution (Attachment 4) recommending the adoption of Seaside’s 6th Cycle Housing Element. Lastly, on November 21, 2023, the Seaside Planning Commission unanimously adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve and adopt the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element.

Revisions & Adoption
On August 30, 2023, the City received preliminary feedback from HCD. In adherence to statutory requirements, City Staff posted the revised draft for public review from October 9th, 2023 through October 13th, 2023. On October 19, 2023 the City received an official comment letter from HCD (Attachment 5) and a second revised Draft was made available for public review on November 6th, 2023 through November 13th, 2023. In both instances, the feedback from HCD primarily directed staff to include additional data, clarify language, and incorporate more concrete timelines. Lastly, based on public comment, the Draft was revised and made available for public review November 27, 2023 through December 4, 2023.

Should Seaside City Council adopt a resolution adopting the Draft and authorizing the City Manager (or his designee) to make non-substantial changes, then City Staff will address any subsequent feedback in the event that HCD issues further comments.

CEQA
The proposed Housing Element does not propose any change to currently allowable Packet Page 163

Item No. 10.A. Page 4 of 4
development levels within the City, does not propose any rezoning of property, and does not approve any projects. Therefore, the Housing Element Update would not facilitate specific development projects nor require zoning or land use changes as part of its adoption or implementation, which could result in physical changes to the environment. As such, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Housing Element would have a significant effect on the environment and therefore it is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

FISCAL IMPACT

ATTACHMENTS

1. Attachment 1: Resolution to Adopt 2023-2031 Draft Housing Element

2. Attachment 2: Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element (2023-2031)

3. Attachment 3: Draft 6th Cycle Technical Appendix

4. Attachment 4: ALUC Resolution

5. Attachment 5: HCD Comment Letter 10.19.23
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:
_________________________________________
Jaime M. Fontes, City Manager
Packet Page 164
RESOLUTION NO. XX-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 23-02 AND ADOPTING THE 6TH CYCLE 2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Housing Element Law (“Act”), California Government Code Section 65580, et seq., each Council of Government (COG) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) are required to determine the existing and projected housing needs within the COG’s respective region; and
WHEREAS, the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) is required by the Act to determine each local jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need in the tri-county region; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) consists of two (2) measurements:
• Existing need for housing, and
• Future need for housing, and
WHEREAS, in October 2022, AMBAG allocated a total of 616 housing units to the City of Seaside; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires local governments to make plans to adequately address their share of existing and projected population growth, taking into consideration affordability of available and future housing; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside initiated efforts to produce a Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element in 2015; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside undertook concerted efforts to notify and engage the public throughout the process, including:
• Presentation to Seaside Planning Commission in 2018; and • Stakeholder Focus Groups throughout 2022; and
• Housing Element Update to Seaside City Council May 18, 2023; and • Presentation to Seaside Homeless Commission on May 23, 2023; and • Presentation to Seaside Planning Commission on June 21, 2023; and • Community Workshops (virtual and in-person) on June 20, 2023 and June 22, 2023; and • Presentation to Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission October 23, 2023; and • Presentation to the Seaside Planning Commission November 21, 2023; and • Ongoing tabling presence at City events; and
• Ongoing outreach to community partners and stakeholders; and WHEREAS, the City of Seaside seeks to adequately address housing needs and demands; and WHEREAS, the City has accounted for previously approved housing developments and taken inventory of sites suitable for development in order to address its 6th Cycle RHNA; and, WHEREAS, based on conditions of existing uses, age of structures, recent and projected development trends, expressed interests from property owners and developers, the existing uses are not considered impediments to residential development and are likely to discontinue during the period covered by the Housing Element 2023-2031; and Packet Page 165
WHEREAS, the initial Draft of the 6th Cycle Housing Element was made available for public review May 19, 2023 through June 26, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element was submitted to HCD on July 21, 2023; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2023 the Seaside Housing Division submitted to HCD a revised Draft 6 th Cycle Housing Element revised based on preliminary feedback from HCD and this Draft was made available for public review October 6, 2023 through October 13, 2023; and WHEREAS, based on feedback received from HCD on October 19, 2023, the Draft Housing Element was revised and made available for public review November 6, 2023 through November 13, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2023 revisions were made to the Draft Housing Element, omitting Seaside East from pages 3, 6 and 30 in the Draft Housing Element and App-2, 38, 114, and 141 from the Draft Technical Appendix; and
WHEREAS, the revised Draft Housing Element reflecting the November 21, 2023 revisions was made available for public review November 27, 2023 through December 4, 2023.

WHEREAS, the City of Seaside has incorporated the feedback received from both HCD and the public.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Seaside does resolve, declare, and determine and order as follows:

SECTION 1. The Seaside City Council approves General Plan Amendment (GPA) 23-02 and adopts the 2023-2031 6th Cycle Housing Element.

SECTION 2. The Seaside City Council delegates authority to the Seaside City Manager, or his designee, to incorporate minor changes or revisions into the 2023-2031 Housing Element, which are of a non-legislative nature and that result from HCD’s review for final certification of the Housing Element, without further City Council consideration or re-adoption of the 2023- 2031 Housing Element.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside, State of California, on the 7th day of December 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
Packet Page 166
0 | CITY OF SEASIDE
City of Seaside
2023-2031 Housing Element
Draft
July 2023
Revised October 2023
Revised November 2023
Packet Page 167
1 | CITY OF SEASIDE
The State of California has identified “the availability of housing is of vital statewide importance, and the early attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every Californian, including farmworkers, is a priority of the highest order.” The Housing element serves as a strategy to address both the community’s short-term and long-term housing needs across the economic and social spectrum including the needs of extremely low-income households, and targeted groups.

This Housing Element details the policies and housing program to address a growing and changing demand for housing. It includes a detailed technical analysis of housing needs, resources, and constraints and a review of the current Housing Element goals, policies, and programs, which were used to develop new policies and implementation programs. The technical analysis chapter is provided as a technical appendix to the General Plan.

Statutory Requirements
This Housing Element has been prepared to meet State General Plan law and the Base Reuse Plan.

General Plan
State law requires the preparation of a Housing Element as part of a jurisdiction's General Plan (Government Code §65302(c)). It is the primary planning guide for local jurisdictions to identify and prioritize the housing needs of the city and determine ways to best meet these needs, while balancing community objectives and resources.

Specific requirements of the Housing Element are codified in Government Code §65580 through §65589.8. The Housing Element must include an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. The Housing Element must identify adequate sites for housing, including rental housing, factory-built housing, mobile homes, and emergency shelters, and make adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community.

Unlike other General Plan elements, however, the Housing Element must be updated periodically according to the statutory schedule. This Housing Element for the City of Seaside represents the sixth cycle update and covers the planning period of December 15, 2023 through December 15, 2031.

This 6th cycle Housing Element is consistent with both the current and proposed General Plan.

The City is undergoing a comprehensive update to the General Plan, including the Housing Element. Development potential for RHNA has been compared to both the current and proposed General Plan. As individual elements of the General Plan are updated in the future, the City will review and revise the Housing Element as appropriate and necessary to maintain internal consistency with the General Plan.

Packet Page 168
2 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Setting the Scene
Incorporated in 1954, Seaside is one of seven cities on the Monterey Peninsula. Nearby cities include Marina, Del Rey Oaks, Monterey, and Carmel-by-the-Sea. Over-looking Monterey Bay, the City was developed as a primarily single family community in the 1950s and 1960s.

Seaside’s proximity to the former Fort Ord, climate, and range of housing options have made the community a desirable place to live. Many people who were attracted to the area for employment and other opportunities related to the military base chose to remain in the City even after the closure of the Fort Ord Military Reservation. Additional growth and rising housing prices throughout the Peninsula, as well as the opening and expansion of the California State University at Monterey Bay, have placed additional demands on the City’s housing stock.

The Fort Ord military base was expanded between 1968 and 1978 during the height of the Vietnam War, and, subsequently, the mobilization of the Seventh Infantry Division. This expansion created a great demand for housing, particularly for the non-commissioned officers and enlisted personnel who were unable to secure housing on base. Seaside and Marina, as the adjoining cities, developed during that time to meet this housing demand. As a result, Seaside produced a significant amount of low-cost housing for military personnel. This housing demand was eased somewhat when the Army built more on-base housing in the late 1980s. However, workers in the hospitality and other service industries replaced the military personnel in Seaside, where the majority of affordable housing on the Monterey Peninsula could be found. Even with the base closure of Fort Ord, Seaside continues to provide the bulk of affordable housing on the Monterey Peninsula. The closure of Fort Ord and continuing expansion of California State University Monterey Bay (CSUMB) and decrease in available land have brought new opportunities and challenges for Seaside.

Key Issues and Opportunities
• Demographic shifts. Several shifts in the City’s population and household compositions have implications on housing demand (see Section 2, Housing Needs, of this Housing Technical Appendix). Specifically:
o Decreased adults in the family-forming age (25-44) due to the rising housing costs and limited employment opportunities.
o Increased senior population (65+); and
o Increased single households, including seniors living alone.

These trends typically lead to the demand for smaller housing units, alternative housing options, and options for rental housing.
• Housing problems relating to housing age, cost burden and overcrowding. o At least 80 percent of the housing stock is more than 30 years old, the age when rehabilitation or substantial repairs may be needed. o About 75 percent of the housing stock is comprised of single-family homes, with 39 percent of the households being owner-households. This implies a significant portion of the City’s single-family homes are being used as rentals.

Prevalence of absentee landlords may present issues with deferred maintenance.
o While both home prices and rents are increasing, renter-households are disproportionately impacted by housing problems such as cost burden (paying Packet Page 169
3 | CITY OF SEASIDE
more than 30 percent of income on housing) and overcrowding (with more than one person per room). Approximately 63 percent of the renterhouseholds vs. 28 percent of the owner-households are experiencing housing cost burden.
o Overcrowding is also more prevalent among renter-households at 17 percent compared to five percent of overcrowded owner-households. • Mismatch between housing preferences and available housing types. The Seaside housing market does not provide sufficient housing that is affordable to lower income households such as those with service occupation jobs or CSUMB students, staff, and recent graduates. The primarily single-family housing stock also does not offer a variety of housing types to accommodate the community’s increasingly diverse housing needs.
• Recent residential growth. The combined effects of the water shortage, housing market downturn between 2008 and 2012, and a slow recovery have led to a virtual standstill in residential development in recent years. However, the City is beginning to see revived interests in residential development and an increase in property values. • Water supply. The Monterey Peninsula has long faced water supply challenges that have hindered new residential development opportunities. All available water has been allocated. This Housing Element includes a program for the City to pursue other strategies for additional water.
• Future Residential Development. This General Plan update offers an opportunity to reexamine the City’s land use policies and seek strategies for preserving and improving the City’s low and medium density single-family neighborhoods on the one hand and increasing the potential of infill residential development in medium to high density focus areas. Areas with residential development potential include:
o Parcels within the West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan are designated for a range of residential densities. Up to 60 units per acre is allowed and mixed use project must have a minimum density of 30 units per acre. o Mixed use opportunities along East Broadway Boulevard corridor and Fremont Boulevard corridor.
o The Long Range Property Management Plan of the Seaside Successor Agency identifies a number of agency-owned properties that may be disposed for development in the future (discussed further later). Six of those properties are identified as potential sites with residential/mixed use development potential.

One has already been acquired by a developer to construct a 106-unit Ascent project.
o Seaside East future growth area and future specific plan area offer long-range residential growth potential for single-family, multifamily, and mixed use housing.

Packet Page 170
4 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Housing Plan
The Housing Plan’s goals, policies, and implementation programs reflect existing and projected housing needs. The Housing Plan addresses key housing constraints, builds upon housing resources, and emphasizes successful local programs. The Housing Plan is organized into two sections: Goals and Policies, and Housing Programs. Each section is organized by the following topics:
● Maintenance and Preservation of Housing and Neighborhoods ● Housing Production, Diversity, and Opportunities
● Housing Affordability and Protections
● Affirmative Actions to Further Fair Housing
● Housing Opportunities for Special Needs Residents
● Public/Private Partnerships and Regional Collaboration ● Community Involvement
Packet Page 171
5 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Goals and Policies
Maintenance and Preservation of Housing and Neighborhoods Goal H-1: Well-maintained neighborhoods and housing conditions support an improved quality of life.

Intent: The City of Seaside has an aging housing stock and deferred maintenance affects neighborhoods in the City. This goal seeks to improve the quality of existing housing in the community, encourage safe housing, and promote natural resource conservation and efficiency in the City’s existing housing.

Policies:
● Improvement of existing housing. Promote the repair, improvement, and rehabilitation of the City’s housing stock and properties in order to enhance quality of life in the City and promote community identity and pride.
● Neighborhood involvement. Support neighborhood associations, commissions, and other community groups that instill a sense of community, enhance neighborhood identities, and encourage grassroots efforts to address nuisances and eliminate blight. ● Adequate and decent housing. Explore options for City policies and programs to reduce overcrowding and promote safe, affordable housing.
● Residential hazards. Promote the mitigation of residential hazards and safety issues (such as lead-based paint, molding, Dilapidated Structures, etc.) ● Sustainability. Promote sustainability through the use of green building techniques and materials for new construction and substantial rehabilitation of residential development.
● Resource conservation. Offer incentives to promote the use of energy-efficient and water-conserving features and materials for residential rehabilitation projects. ● Enforcement. City Code Enforcement, Building officials, Fire officials, and others, including the Neighborhood Improvement Commission, work together on code compliance issues throughout the City.
● Access to transportation and services. Integrate pedestrian and bicycle amenities and improved pathways to housing to improve travel choices and enhanced quality of life.

Housing Production, Diversity, and Opportunities
Goal H-2: Neighborhoods with a range of housing opportunities to meet the existing and projected needs of all socioeconomic segments of the community.

Intent: A diverse housing inventory is needed to meet the changing socio and economic needs of the community. Demographics shifts in the last two decades and expected changes in the future require a range of housing options that can give residents choice of housing options and the ability to age-in-place as their housing needs evolve over time. Anticipated economic growth also demands new housing to be constructed in order to improve the jobs-housing balance. Furthermore, the City has an obligation under State law to accommodate a share of the region’s projected housing needs.

Packet Page 172
6 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Policies:
● Variety of housing. Provide a variety of housing types, sizes, and prices throughout the City to increase housing choice and ensure that households of all types and income levels have the opportunity to find suitable ownership or rental housing. ● Affordability by design. Encourage the creation of smaller and more affordable residential units that are affordable by design – units that are physically smaller and more efficiently designed.
● Aging in place. Support the concept of “aging in place” by offering a range of housing types and sizes that allows people to remain in the community as their housing needs change.
● Innovative housing options. Encourage the development of innovative housing options, including micro units and co-housing arrangements, to provide affordable housing options for seniors and single households.
● De-concentration of affordable units. Promote a geographic dispersal of units affordable to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate-income households throughout the City.
● Accessory dwelling units. Allow the development of accessory dwelling units in existing residential neighborhoods as an affordable alternative.

Goal H-3: Ample new housing affordable available to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate-income households in Seaside.

Intent: While Seaside has more affordable housing inventory compared to other communities in the Monterey Peninsula, rising costs in recent years have compelled many, especially those with lower incomes, to live in inadequate housing. Expanding affordable housing opportunities will benefit many, including young professionals looking to remain or relocate to Seaside, firsttime buyers, or seniors looking to downsize, among others.

Policies:
● Multi-family housing construction. Encourage the construction of high-quality, welldesigned multi-family housing and residential mixed-use projects along Broadway Avenue, Fremont Boulevard, the City’s existing multi-family neighborhoods, and the Campus Town and Seaside East Specific Plan Areas.
● Density bonus. Implement the State density bonus program to provide incentives for additional affordable housing and maximizing available land on in-fill development sites.
● Acquisition and rehabilitation. Partner with non-profit housing developers to acquire and maintain property as affordable housing, actively pursuing local, State, and federal funding programs or mechanisms for affordable housing.
● Allocation of water and sewer services. In compliance with State law, prioritize in-fill development sites to accommodate the allocation of water and sewer services for affordable housing.

Packet Page 173
7 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Goal H-4: A streamlined development process to encourage housing production and reduce the costs of development.

Intent: A lengthy development process can add to the costs of housing development, costs which are ultimately passed through to the consumers. To facilitate housing production, the City will streamline a process to encourage housing production and offer a land use strategy that allocates adequate land resources and establishes appropriate development standards to accommodate future housing.

Policies:
● Adequate sites for RHNA. Identify adequate sites with appropriate zoning and development standards to facilitate and encourage housing production commensurate with the projected housing needs of the City, including the City’s share of regional housing needs.
● Parcel consolidation. Offer incentives and/or regulatory reliefs to encourage lot consolidation of small parcels for multi-family development and lot mergers of contiguous substandard lots with common ownership.
● Development standards and procedures. Regularly review the City’s development standards and procedures to identify potential constraints to the production, maintenance, and development of housing, and to develop appropriate measures to mitigate constraints.

Housing Affordability and Protections
Goal H-5: A City that preserves and enhances housing affordability in the community, with an emphasis on promoting affordable housing for extremely low, low, and moderate income households.

Intent: Rising construction materials and labor costs, and energy costs, along with diminishing public funds for affordable housing, have made it increasingly difficult to create new affordable housing. Therefore it is critical for the City to explore diverse avenues to expand affordable housing opportunities and to preserve and enhance affordability of the existing housing stock.

Policies:
● Incentives. Facilitate the development and provision of affordable housing through regulatory incentives, density bonuses, and other financial assistance (as funding permits, use of prefabricated materials).
● Long-term affordability. Ensure that units produced for extremely low, very low, low and moderate-income households are maintained as long-term affordable units by adopting deed restrictions and other reasonable mechanisms/deed restrictions to maintain the affordability for subsequent owners/renters of below market-rate housing.
● Monitor affordable housing. Monitor affordable housing programs to ensure continued availability of below market rate housing in Seaside.
● Short-term rentals. The Seaside Municipal Code 17.52.252 regulates Short-Term Rentals in Seaside. Rather than setting a limit on the number of short-term rentals, the Council chose to identify the number of non-hosted units existed prior to April 2018 and allowed those to apply for an STR license. Hosted units may apply for an STR Packet Page 174
8 | CITY OF SEASIDE
license regardless of when they began operating. All units must pass inspection, and uphold certain criteria established to help maintain the character of the neighborhood.

Council will review the number of licenses and various enforcement efforts at least annually. The STRs must pay TOT (transient occupancy tax) and it is kept in a separate fund. The Council requested that 50 percent of the funds be used for affordable housing in Seaside.

Goal H-6: A City that protects Seaside households from the risks of displacement.

Intent: Rising housing costs, particularly rental rates, have resulted in the displacement of existing residents. While the City has limited influence over the market, the City will work to preserve its rental housing inventory and expand its housing inventory.

Policies:
● No net loss. Require no net loss in the number of residential units during reconstruction or renovation in multifamily and mixed-use neighborhoods. ● Replacement housing. Require the replacement of housing units demolished as a result of redevelopment on sites identified in this Housing Element, if the units were deed-restricted as affordable to lower income households or were occupied by lower income households.
● First right of refusal. During housing redevelopment, provide displaced households with the first right to return to replacement units.
● Condominium conversion. Monitor the condominium conversion trends and devise appropriate actions to ensure a stable rental housing inventory.

Goal H-7: A City that affirmatively furthers fair housing for all.

Intent: The City has a diverse population. The City strives to offer equal access for all to the housing opportunities.

Policies:
● Equal housing opportunity. Work to ensure equal housing opportunities for all, including those special groups protected by State and federal fair housing laws. ● Fair Housing Actions to Remove Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. Pursue meaningful actions to remove or mitigate impediments to fair housing choice. ● Fair Housing Outreach and Education. Continue to provide fair housing outreach and education to residents, housing providers, and housing professionals.

Housing Opportunities for Special Needs Residents
Goal H-8: A diverse housing stock that meets the unique housing needs of special needs groups in Seaside, including seniors, persons with disabilities, homeless, atrisk youth, and veterans, among others.

Intent: Certain households have unique housing needs. This goal seeks to provide a diverse housing inventory that offers a spectrum of options to accommodate the varied and changing needs of its residents, including special needs housing, support services for special needs residents, and incentives for new development.

Policies:

Packet Page 175
9 | CITY OF SEASIDE
● Special needs housing. Encourage the development of housing that is accessible to special needs residents, especially seniors, disabled veterans, homeless, and transitional foster youth through transitional and supportive housing, ensuring reasonable accommodation, and provision of emergency shelters. ● Incentives for housing for seniors and disabled. Provide incentives to support senior housing, assisted living facilities, and housing for persons with disabilities (including persons with developmental disabilities) on sites within proximity to supportive services, community facilities, and public transportation. ● Continuum of care for the homeless. Support a continuum of housing options for the homeless, ranging from rapid re-housing, emergency shelters, low barrier navigation centers, transitional housing, and permanent supportive housing, and safe parking for homeless individuals and families. (The City established a safe parking license that may be issued to proper providers, following guidelines to promote safety for participants, while maintaining the character of a neighborhood.) ● Supportive services for the homeless. Provide a range of supportive services for the homeless with an emphasis on homeless prevention.
● Universal design. Encourage universal design of housing products and environments, making them usable by a wide range people with different physical and mental abilities.
● Access to transportation and services. Integrate special needs housing in close proximity to transit and public services.

Public/Private Partnerships and Regional Collaboration
Goal H-9: The City of Seaside is a leader seeking regional solutions to housing issues in the Monterey Bay area.

Intent: Many housing issues, such as affordable housing, jobs-housing balance, and homelessness, are regional issues that require regional solutions. This goal sets a framework for supporting Seaside’s continued work and leadership around regional housing issues.

Policies:
● Collaborative partnerships. Participate in collaborative partnerships of neighboring jurisdictions, non-profit organizations, affordable and for-profit housing developers, and major employers in the production of a variety of affordable housing opportunities in Seaside.
● Collaboration with Post-FORA Agencies. The former Ford Ord area remains a significant resource for future housing opportunities such as Campus Town Specific Plan area and Seaside East Future Growth area. The City will work closely with neighboring jurisdictions and other post-FORA agencies in the planning for these areas. ● Regional planning. Participate in regional planning efforts to address regional housing issues, such as the Sustainable Communities Strategy, a jobs-housing balance, and homelessness prevention.
● Fair Housing. Participate in regional efforts to address fair housing issues and disparities in access to opportunities through the Regional Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice process.

Packet Page 176
10 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Community Involvement
Goal H-10: An open process that facilitates community involvement in the development of housing policies and programs and enhance accountability.

Intent: The City values the opinions and contributions of its residents in trying to address the community’s housing issues. This goal seeks to maintain open channels of communication and engage in collaborative planning efforts with the community and developers.

Policies:
● Accountability in implementation. Maintain City leadership in helping attain the objectives of the City’s Housing Element by following through on the prescribed actions in a timely manner and monitoring progress annually. ● Collaborative planning. Encourage and support early public participation in the development and review of City housing policy from all economic and demographic segments of the community, including the encouragement of neighborhood-level planning and working with community groups and other interest groups. ● Community engagement by developers. Encourage developers of any major project to have neighborhood meetings with residents early in the process to undertake early problem solving and facilitate a more informed, efficient, and constructive development review process.

Housing Programs
Maintenance and Preservation of Housing and Neighborhoods

1. Code Enforcement/Neighborhood Improvement Commission (NIC): The City has developed a comprehensive code enforcement team of representatives from Planning, Public Works, Building, Police, Fire, and the County Health Departments to ensure safe and decent living environments for all Seaside residents. City Staff responds to complaints regarding substandard housing, property maintenance, overgrown vegetation, trash and debris, improper occupancy, and other nuisance and building code complaints, including compliance with the National Standard for Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities.

In order to bring together all aspects of housing, inspection, code enforcement and implementation efforts, the City has established a coordinated program among various departments. This program ties code enforcement efforts with fire prevention, neighborhood policing, and related neighborhood improvement activities.

The Neighborhood Improvement Commission convenes regularly, producing recommendations to City Council on ways to improve the appearance of the City and elicit voluntary cooperation to minimize vandalism. The Commission encourages citizens to beautify and upgrade their properties and remove items that adversely influence property values. In addition, they encourage voluntarily compliance with various city codes relating to the general appearance of the City; work with service clubs and civic organizations to promote and implement programs to help in neighborhood cleanup efforts; and conduct administrative hearings relating to property maintenance.

One of the Commission's primary objectives is to encourage Seaside residents to beautify and upgrade their landscapes and home exteriors. Each month, the Neighborhood Improvement Commission, through a House of the Month program, nominates several homes in a selected area for their curb side appeal, and outstanding property Packet Page 177
11 | CITY OF SEASIDE
maintenance. The Commission then votes to determine a single winner. Winners are then invited to attend a City Council meeting where they are presented an award by the Mayor consisting of a personalized engraved plaque, and a gift certificate to any local business of their choice. In promoting and recognizing residents with well-kept homes and beautiful landscapes, the Commission proactively helps in positively influencing surrounding property values and improving the overall livability throughout the City. 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Continue to implement the Neighborhood Improvement Commission (NIC) and focus code enforcement efforts in the target areas with concentrated issues of code violations. Conduct monthly meetings with the NIC to address housing conditions issues.
● Promote the app, SeeClickFix that allows anyone to report problems to the City for resolution via their smartphone. Distribute code enforcement business cards with links to the app to residents and businesses.
● Annually pursue funding available at the state and federal levels to assist in code corrections and residential rehabilitation (see also Program 3). Ensure Code Enforcement Officers provide information on resources available for making code corrections.

Financing: General Fund
Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Building and Code Enforcement Division; Public Works and Engineering Department; Police Department; Fire Department; Monterey County Health department; Neighborhood Associations; and NIC

2. Vacant Residential Property Registration: In 2011, the City adopted Ordinance No. 996 to establish a vacant residential property registration program as a mechanism to protect residential neighborhoods from becoming blighted through the lack of adequate maintenance, voided building permits, and security of vacant properties. The program requires mortgage lenders to inspect defaulted properties to confirm occupancy. If a property is found to be vacant, the ordinance requires that the lender exercise the abandonment clause within their mortgage contract, register the property with the City and immediately begin to secure and maintain the property to the "neighborhood standard." In cases of voided building permits, the Building Official shall seek construction schedule from property owner to complete the construction activity. Where a voided building permit has been deemed to constitute a visual blight and attractive nuisance, the Building Official may initiate legal proceedings for the demolition of the structure(s) or improvements to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. While foreclosure has not been a significant trend in the last ten years or so, with the economic impacts of Covid, foreclosure rate is expected to rise. This program will help prevent blighting conditions from occurring.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Continue to implement program and utilize the Code Enforcement team to ensure compliance with the ordinance. Residents and businesses can use the SeeClickFix app to report vacant properties.

Financing: General funds
Packet Page 178
12 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Responsible Agencies: Community Development, Building, Fire Department, and Code Enforcement

3. Acquisition/Rehabilitation: Approximately 80 percent of the City’s housing stock was built prior to 1990, making the majority of the housing units older than 30 years. The City has a significant need for housing rehabilitation assistance, both in the rental and ownership housing inventories. In 2021, the City created an affordable housing development nonprofit called Seaside Housing Collaborative whose mission is to conceptualize, plan, entitle, construct, acquire, sell or lease affordable housing up to and including workforce housing within the City of Seaside.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Partner with nonprofits to acquire and rehabilitate deteriorating multi-family housing units with the goal of rehabilitating 20 units between 2023 and 2031. Also, deed-restrict affordable housing for lower income households and persons with special needs.
● Annually pursue funding resources available at the State and federal levels to assist in rehabilitation of rental and ownership housing.

Financing: State and federal housing funds as available Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Housing Program Manager; Seaside Housing Collaborative

4. Resource Conservation: The City will promote resource conservation in residential construction and rehabilitation. The City of Seaside has joined the Monterey Bay Community Power (MBCP), another energy provider. MBCP promotes electrification, incentives for Building Reach Codes, and low interest loans for generators. 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Review proposed developments for solar access, site design techniques, and use of landscaping that can increase energy efficiency and reduce lifetime energy costs without significantly increasing housing production costs. ● Provide and annually update information on energy conservation and financial incentives (e.g., tax credit, utility rebates, etc.) on the City’s website.

Financing: None required
Responsible Agency: Community Development/Planning Division and Building and Code Enforcement Division
Housing Production, Diversity, and Opportunities

5. Adequate Sites for RHNA and By-Right Approval: The existing and proposed Land Use Elements provide for a variety of residential types and densities, ranging from lower intensity single-family homes, to moderate density condominiums and townhomes, to higher density apartments and mixed-use developments. For the sixth cycle Housing Element, the City has been assigned aa Regional Housing Needs Allocation of 616 units (86 very low; 55 low; 156 moderate; and 319 above moderate income units). With projected ADUs (112 units) and approved projects (Enclave at Cypress Grove), and Campus Town, the City has a remaining RHNA of 75 units (50 very low; 15 low or 66 lower; and nine moderate Packet Page 179
13 | CITY OF SEASIDE
income units). Under the existing Land Use policy, the City can accommodate 197 units (132 lower and 65 moderate income units) in the identified vacant and underutilized sites meeting its remaining RHNA of 75 units. 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Pursuant to AB 1397, amend the Zoning Code by the end of 2024 to permit residential use by right for housing development in which at least 20 percent of the units are affordable to lower income households if the sites meet one of the following conditions:
o Sites that were identified in the fifth cycle Housing Element for meeting the lower income RHNA
o Sites that are identified in the sixth cycle Housing Element to be rezoned to higher density for meeting the lower income RHNA (see below) ● Pursue adoption of the 2040 General Plan by the end of 2024 ● Complete rezoning of sites inventory by the end of 2024 to implement the proposed Land Use policy. The rezoned sites will meet the requirements of Government Code 65583.2, including but not limited to a minimum density of 20 units per acre, minimum site size to permit at least 16 units on site, and zoned to allow ownership and rental housing by right in which at least 20 percent of the units are affordable to lower households. As part of the rezoning, appropriate income development standards (including but not limited to setbacks, lot coverage, height, and parking, among others) will be established to ensure the allowable maximum density of each zone can be achieved.
● Provide the residential sites inventory to interested developers. ● Pursue development of future growth areas and future specific plan areas through specific or master planning techniques. Ensure that residential development is considered in these areas to accommodate the appropriate mix of future housing needs in the community.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agency: Community Development/Planning Division

6. Replacement Housing: Seaside will require replacement housing units subject to the requirements of Government Code, section 65915, subdivision (c)(3) on sites identified in the sites inventory of this Housing Element when any new development (residential, mixed-use or non-residential) occurs on a site that has been occupied by or restricted for the use of lower income households at any time during the previous five years.

This requirement applies to:
• Non-vacant sites
• Vacant sites with previous residential uses that have been vacated or demolished Packet Page 180
14 | CITY OF SEASIDE
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
• By the end of 2024, as part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update, establish the replacement requirements pursuant to State law. Specifically, mitigate the loss of affordable housing units by requiring new housing developments to replace all affordable housing units lost due to new development.

Financing: General Funds
Responsible Agency: Community Development/Planning Division

7. Monitoring of Residential Capacity (No Net Loss): Future residential development in Seaside will occur primarily along mixed-use corridors, with the redevelopment of existing multifamily buildings, and in new growth areas. The City will monitor the development of residential and mixed use sites included in the inventory to ensure an adequate inventory continues to be available to meet the City’s RHNA obligations by income level, consistent with the No Net Loss requirements in Government Code Section 65863. Should an approval of development result in a reduction of capacity below the residential capacity needed to accommodate the remaining RHNA by income level, the City will ensure adequate capacity is provided in existing Seaside neighborhoods, Main Gate Specific Plan areas, the future growth areas, and/or future specific plan areas to accommodate the RHNA.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● By the end of 2024, establish a formal procedure to comply with SB 166 (No Net Loss). If additional sites (such as through master planning in the future growth areas or future specific plan areas) are required to replenish the sites inventory, the sites shall be rezoned within 180 days when a shortfall in RHNA capacity is identified.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agency: Community Development/Planning Division

8. Lot Consolidation: Most of the City’s vacant and underutilized sites available for residential or mixed development in the near term are smaller and require lot consolidation/merger to facilitate developments with quality design and on-site amenities.

Currently, the City has provisions in the Zoning Ordinance to facilitate improvement on health and safety conditions and future development potential - two or more contiguous parcels may be merged by the City Council when the parcels are held by the same owner if:
● One of the parcels is undeveloped with structures, and ● At least one of the parcels is considered substandard due to size (less than 5,000 square feet), inconsistency with General Plan or applicable specific plan, or contains health and safety hazards.

To facilitate future development, the City will modify the lot consolidation program to remove the requirements for undeveloped parcel(s) and substandard lot size, and to develop mechanisms and incentives to encourage lot consolidation. Incentives to be considered may include increased density or Floor Area Ratio, height limit, reduced parking requirements, and/or streamlined processing of lot consolidation applications, etc.

Packet Page 181
15 | CITY OF SEASIDE
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Encourage lot consolidation by assisting interested developers in identifying sites with consolidation potential.
● By the end of 2024, as part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance to implement the General Plan, modify the lot consolidation requirements and establish incentives for consolidation.
● Promote lot consolidation incentives to property owners and developers. ● Require the merger of contiguous substandard lots of record when a property is developed or redeveloped.
● In the end of 2026, assess the effectiveness of incentives and actions in promoting the consolidation and development of small parcels, and make appropriate adjustments to facilitate lot consolidation within 6 months.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agency: Community Development/Planning Division

9. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): Recognizing the potential of accessory dwelling units as an affordable housing option, the State has passed several significant measures to ease restrictions on these units. The City adopted a comprehensive update of its ADU provisions in April 2022 and again in March 2023 to ensure compliance with changes to Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22. The City website has a page dedicated to ADU Guide, which provides a step-by-step building permit process. The City has also made available three pre-approved plans for ADU. Plan check fees are waived for property owners who use the pre-approved ADU plans.

In 2021, the City allocated five acre-feet of water for owners to purchase to construct ADUs. The City’s ADU Guide provides a link for property owners to apply for additional water rights.

The City also secured $1,000,000 in CalHome grant to implement an ADU Loan Program. 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Facilitate the development of 112 ADUs over eight years. ● Annually update the City website to provide ADU resources and technical guidance for the public.
● Inform ADU applicants that ADU units are subject to SB 329 and SB 222- rental unit cannot be denied based on source of income - by posting information on the City website and the ADU application by July 2024.
● Annually assess the availability of water rights for ADU construction. ● By the end of 2023, update City website to provide link to California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) ADU Grant Program that provides a $40,000 grant for income-eligible homeowners to pay for pre-development expenses.

Packet Page 182
16 | CITY OF SEASIDE
● By the end of 2024, implement the CalHome ADU Loan program, with the goal of facilitating providing loans for the construction of ten ADUs to be occupied by low income renters. Pursue additional funding at least every other year. ● Upon HCD’s review of the City’s Updated ADU Ordinance adopted April 2023, the City will amend its ADU ordinance if necessary to be consistent with ADU law by the end of 2024.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agency: Community Development/Planning Division and Housing Program Manager

10. Housing on Faith-Based Properties: AB 1851, approved in 2020, encourages religious institutions to pursue housing development by allowing these institutions to eliminate up to 50% of their parking spaces for housing. Cities may not require churches to replace that parking. The City identified three church sites (five parcels) with vacant and underutilized land that could be suitable for moderate income housing.

The City will work to facilitate affordable housing in faith-based properties by creating a packet outlining land use and development information for affordable housing production on faith-based organization sites and provide that information, along with staff contact details, to owners and occupants of faith-based sites within the City at east every two years.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Create an informational packet and do initial delivery by April 2025 and then update and provide subsequent deliveries every two years thereafter.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agency: Community Development/Planning Division

11. Development of Housing for Extremely Low income Households and Special Needs Households: The City will work to expand affordable housing opportunities, especially to extremely low income household and those with special needs (e.g., elderly, homeless, farmworkers, persons with disabilities, female-headed households). 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Consistent with State law that mandates the provision of housing for ELI households, the City will prioritize processing and funding allocation for projects that include units for ELI households.
● Consistent with State law that mandates the provision of housing for special needs households, the City will prioritize processing and funding allocation for projects that include units for special needs households. • Beginning in 2024 and annually thereafter, pursue funding available at the State and Federal levels for affordable housing development. Specifically, pursue funding programs that target the needs of extremely low and very low income households.
• Provide letters of support to funding applications by developers if the proposed projects are consistent with the goals and objectives of this Housing Element, as requested.

Packet Page 183
17 | CITY OF SEASIDE
• Annually outreach and coordinate with affordable housing developers.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agency: Community Development/Planning Division Housing Affordability and Protections

12. Homebuyer Assistance: With the dissolution of the redevelopment agency, the City has suspended its First-Time Homebuyer Program. However, the City recognizes the value its residents place on homeownership opportunities. The following homebuyer assistance programs offered by the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) are available to Seaside residents:
● CalHFA Conventional Loan Program: This is a first mortgage loan insured through private mortgage insurance on the conventional market. The interest rate on the CalPLUS Conventional is fixed throughout the 30-year term. ● CalPLUS Conventional Loan Program: This program is a conventional first mortgage with a slightly higher fixed interest rate than our standard conventional program.

This loan is fully amortized for a 30-year term and is combined with the CalHFA Zero Interest Program (ZIP) for closing costs.
● MyHome Assistance Program: This program offers a deferred-payment junior loan for an amount up to the lesser of 3.5 percent of the purchase price or appraised value to assist with downpayment and/or closing costs.

Seaside residents can apply for CalHFA programs through local loan officers who have completed training for these programs. CalHFA maintains a hotline and website to help residents identify local loan officers. First-time homebuyers must attend a homebuyer education course either online or in-person through NeighborWorks America or any HUDapproved housing counseling agencies. In March 2020, the City created a dedicated Housing page on its website to provide links to various housing resources, including homebuyer assistance.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Periodically update the City website to promote resources available to first-time homebuyers.
● Annually explore and pursue funding opportunities to reinstate homebuyer assistance programs with the goal of assisting ten households. ● Continue supporting ECHO First Time Homebuyer Counseling services in Seaside.

Financing: None required
Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Housing Program Manager

13. Housing Choice Voucher Program: The Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program provides rental subsidies to extremely low and very low income families and elderly households who spend more than 30 percent of their gross income on housing. The Housing Authority of Monterey County (HACM) administers the Housing Choice Voucher Program for Seaside. 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:

Packet Page 184
18 | CITY OF SEASIDE
● Support HAMC’s efforts to pursue additional funds and petition for higher payment standards.
● Promote the use of HCVs, with the goal of maintaining HCV assistance to 215 households, and increasing the use of vouchers by 10% over eight years ● Work with ECHO Housing, the City’s Fair Housing service provider to educate tenants and landlords regarding the State’s new source of income protection, which covers the use of HCVs and other public assistance for rent payments.

Financing: Section 8
Responsible Agencies: HACM

14. Preservation of Publicly Assisted Low Income Housing: The City has an inventory of 447 rental units in five developments that are deed-restricted as affordable housing for lower income households. None of these units are considered at risk of converting to market rate in the next ten years.

In 2021, the City created an affordable housing development non-profit called Seaside Housing Collaborative whose mission is to conceptualize, plan, entitle, construct, acquire, sell or lease affordable housing up to and including workforce housing within the City of Seaside.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Monitor Units at Risk: The City will keep in regular contact with the five projects with affordable units to monitor any change in status or intent to maintain the projects as affordable housing. The City will also ensure that no affordable rental unit is allowed to convert to a condominium without meeting the requirements of the City’s adopted condominium conversion ordinance in Chapter 17.42 of the Zoning Ordinance.
● Provide Tenant Education: If any of these projects files a Notice of Intent to opt out of affordability covenants, the City will work with tenants to inform them of their rights under federal and State regulations, including receiving proper noticing.

New State law requires noticing the tenants three years, one year, and six months ahead of conversion.
● Work with Potential Priority Purchasers: Work with Seaside Housing Collaborative to pursue acquisition/rehabilitation opportunities.

Financing: None required.

Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Housing Program Manager

15. Affordable Housing Development: The proposed General Plan introduces higher density mixed use development opportunities in the community. To implement the City’s proposed General Plan and West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan, and to promote a jobs-housing balance in the community, the City will pursue mixed use and residential developments in strategic areas.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:

Packet Page 185
19 | CITY OF SEASIDE
● By the end of 2024 and as part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, through a form-based code approach, establish appropriate development standards and incentives to facilitate mixed use developments and residential development in mixed use neighborhoods. Specifically, in addition to the State-mandated density bonus, the City may consider other incentives and concessions, such as:
o Increased lot coverage;
o Reduced setback requirements;
o Reduced parking requirements;
o Increased permissible building heights;
o Increased FAR;
o Commercial Linkage Fee; and
o Reduced impact fees.
● By the end of 2024 and as part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, establish objective standards to accommodate SB 35 streamlining of affordable housing projects.
● Annually contact affordable housing developers to promote new opportunities and incentives for affordable housing development in the City. ● Facilitate the development of 100 affordable housing units for lower income households, prioritizing funding for projects that include affordable housing for extremely low income households and those with special housing needs:
o Support funding applications for affordable housing by private developers provided the proposed projects are consistent with the City’s General Plan and other specific plans.
o As funding permits, provide financial assistance to affordable housing development using the City’s Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu fee and Transient Occupancy Tax collected from short-term rentals.
o Assist developers identifying available sites for affordable housing.

Financing: Inclusionary Housing In-lieu Fee
Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Housing Program Manager

16. Density Bonus Ordinance: The City’s Density Bonus Ordinance works with the City’s Inclusionary Housing Program to facilitate affordable housing development. However, the Density Bonus Ordinance has not been updated to reflect recent changes in State law.

These include:
• AB 2222: Eliminates density bonuses and other incentives previously available unless the developer agrees to replace pre-existing affordable units on a one-for-one basis.

Increases the required affordability period from 30 years to 55 years for all density bonus units. Furthermore, if the units that qualified an applicant for a density bonus Packet Page 186
20 | CITY OF SEASIDE
are affordable ownership units, as opposed to rental units, they must be subject to an equity sharing model rather than a resale restriction.
• AB 2501: Makes changes to: the timeline for processing application for a density bonus; electing to accept no density increase; and determining the value of concessions and incentives.
• AB 2556: Clarifies the replacement requirements as established by AB 2222. • AB 2442: Requires a density bonus be granted for a housing development if applicant agrees to construct housing for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans, or homeless person.
• AB 1934: Provides a density bonus to a commercial development if the developer enters into an agreement for partnered housing either as a joint project or two separate projects encompassing affordable housing.
• AB 1763: Density bonus and increased incentives for 100 percent affordable housing projects for lower income households.
• AB 1227: Density bonus for student housing development for students enrolled at a full-time college, and to establish prioritization for students experiencing homelessness.
• AB 2345: Revised the requirements for receiving concessions and incentives, and the maximum density bonus provided from 35 percent to 50 percent. 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● By the end of 2024 and as part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, the City will update its density bonus provisions to be consistent with State law.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Planning Division

17. Inclusionary Housing Program: Inclusionary housing is an important tool in the City to facilitate the development of affordable housing for very low, low, and moderate income households. To ensure that the City flexibly responds to the market conditions, the City reviews development applications on a case-by-case basis to assess the obligations under the City’s Inclusionary Housing Program and determines the necessary incentives and/or concessions required to enhance project feasibility and design. If appropriate, payment of an in-lieu fee is offered as an option of fulfilling the inclusionary housing requirement.

Packet Page 187
21 | CITY OF SEASIDE
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Continue to implement the Inclusionary Housing program. ● Review the Inclusionary Housing Program with the Density Bonus Ordinance (Program 13) to ensure consistency with State law by the end of 2024. If inconsistencies are identified, initiate Zoning Ordinance revisions within six months. ● Annually monitor development trends and market conditions to assess the effectiveness of the Inclusionary Housing program.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Planning Division Remove Potential Constraints

18. Parking Standards: While most of the City falls within ½ from transit and be eligible for no parking minimums under AB 2097, current requirements for garage/covered parking for all unit types, including multifamily and condominiums may be a potential constraint for development. The City will review these requirements and address them as part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update. Specifically:
• Requirements for attached single-family units (condos and townhouses) requiring two spaces within a garage plus one space for guest parking; • Guest parking requirement (one space per unit) may in multi-family development. 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● By 2024 and as part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, review garage/covered parking requirements for all unit types and guest parking requirements for multi-family housing. Establish appropriate parking standards to ensure maximum density can be achieved in each zone.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Planning Division

19. Multi-Family and Mixed Use Development Standards and Design Guidelines: Multi-family and mixed use construction in the City is required to undergo architectural review. The City is adopting a form-based code approach, with objective design standards, to guide multi-family and mixed use development in the City. In addition, the City will establish appropriate development standards to ensure maximum density can be achieved in each zone. Specifically, guest parking of one space per unit can be a constraint to multi-family and mixed use development and, FAR of 0.45 in RM and RH can be a constraint to multifamily development. 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● By the end of 2024, establish objective design standards on site planning, massing and scale, and architecture features for multi-family and mixed use development.

Establish appropriate development standards (parking, height, setbacks, FAR, etc.) to ensure maximum density can be achieved in each zone. Remove FAR requirements in residential zones. As part of this update, the City will establish Packet Page 188
22 | CITY OF SEASIDE
thresholds (number of units) to move projects to a ministerial process that does not require public hearings or discretionary decisions.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Planning Division

20.Affordable Attached Single-Family Unit: Currently the City permits attached single-family homes in all residential zones, but affordable single-family homes are only permitted in the RS and RM zones, but not the RH zone. As part of the Zoning Ordinance update, the City will prohibit new single-family housing RH zone as a strategy to preserve residential capacity for multi-family housing.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● By the end of 2024 and as part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, prohibit single-family housing in RH zone (market-rate or affordable).

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Planning Division

21. Adequate Water Supply for the Development of New Housing: There is currently an inadequate supply of water on the Monterey Peninsula for new development to occur. The City is actively pursuing water supply projects. The City has, however, allocated five acrefeet of water for ADUs. On average, each ADU that requires water receives an allocation of

0.03 acre feet. Therefore, we have sufficient water for 166 ADUs, So far 1.413 acre-feet have been allocated for finaled ADU permits. This leaves 3.587 acre-feet remaining for an additional 119 ADU units. To facilitate development of the remaining RHNA of 75 units, the City is actively working with other jurisdictions and agencies to maintain and augment the existing water supply.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:

The actions below do not have a specific timeline as they have been a persistent issue and represent ongoing activities. However, the City engages in recurring activities to further these objectives, such as the Mayor's participation in the monthly Water District Board Meetings and staff's monthly attendance at the Marina Coast meetings. ● Support efforts by the MPWMD to expand the water supply with new water sources being earmarked for development.
● Continue to work to have the MPWMD and MCWD reverse its policy decision of prohibiting the transfer of water credits from one property to another. ● Continue to work with MPWMP and MCWD to develop water conservation methods (e.g., low flow fixtures, instant hot water heaters, cisterns/rain gardens) to augment water for new development projects.
● Pursuant to AB 1087, work with MPWMD to establish a procedure to prioritize water allocation for developments that include units set aside as affordable housing for lower income households, including affordable housing within larger, mixed use developments and larger residential subdivisions.

Packet Page 189
23 | CITY OF SEASIDE
● Upon adoption of the Housing Element, provide a copy of the Element to MPWMD and MCWD for greater awareness of affordable housing priorities and collaboration, in compliance with AB 1087.
● Pursue various strategies to secure water for Seaside’s future development, including:
o Private water: On an ongoing basis, the City will monitor opportunities where the use of private water may be beneficial to accomplish housing objectives. As of May 2023, the City is finalizing an agreement with California American Water Company regarding the use of stored water credits for Ascent Broadway project, an approved project with 106 residential units. The project has been stalled primarily by the Regional Water Quality Control Board order 95-10 which prohibits California American Water from serving parcels where there is new increased development without having identified an additional water supply. o In-Lieu Storage and Recovery Program: Annually, explore with MCWD opportunities for increased use of recycled water. The City began work to divert potable water from the Bayonet and Black Horse Golf Course in January 2020. Specifically, the City Council approved an approximately $7.5 million capacity fee to Marina Coast Water District to bring recycled water to the golf course for the In-Lieu Storage Program, which allows Seaside to accrue water storage credits for the recycled water placed on the golf course. Some of this stored water credit is made available to the Ascent Broadway project. o Diverting potable water used at the Bayonet and Black Horse Golf Course: This strategy was given approval by a judge in October 2019 and the City began work on this in January 2020.
o Pure Water Monterey: The Pure Water Monterey project provides a clean, safe and sustainable source of water for Monterey County. It emphasizes advanced water recycling technology, replenishment of the groundwater supply and protection of the environment.
o California American Water Desalination Project: In November 2022, the California Coastal Commission approved the desalination project. California American Water plans to build the plant to pump ocean water, desalinate it and provide drinking water to 100,000 people on the Monterey Peninsula.

Financing: None required.

Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Planning Division; City Engineering; Seaside Municipal Water Company; CalAm; MPWMD; and MCWD.

22. Planning and Development Fees: Fees for a single-family residence or for a multifamily unit constitute no more than 10% of the building valuation (excluding land cost).

However, some fees in the City are greater than in neighboring jurisdictions and may be a constraint to development.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives: The City will prepare a Comprehensive Fee Study to review fees during the planning period and make amendments as necessary during the Zoning Ordinance update by the end of 2024.

Financing: General fund
Packet Page 190
24 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Planning Division Housing Opportunities for Special Needs Residents

23. Housing for Extremely Low Income and Special Needs Households: The Zoning Ordinance is the primary implementation tool for the Land Use Element and can be used to encourage the development of housing for extremely low income and special needs households (including persons with developmental disabilities). 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives: By the end of 2024 and as part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, address the following housing-related code amendments:
● Transitional and Supportive Housing: Transitional housing is defined in Government Code Section 65582(h) as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculating of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future point in time that shall be no less than six months from the beginning of the assistance.

Supportive housing means housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to an onsite or offsite service that assists the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. Target population means persons with low incomes who have one or more disabilities, including mental illness, HIV or AIDS, substance abuse, other chronic health conditions, or individuals eligible for services provided pursuant to the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 4500) of the Welfare and Institutions Code) and may include, among other populations, adults, emancipated minors, families with children, elderly persons, young adults aging out of the foster care system, individuals exiting from institutional settings, veterans, and homeless people (California Government Code Sections 65582(f) and (g)).

The City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to define transitional and supportive housing pursuant to California Government Code and to permit such housing in all zones where residential uses are permitted, subject to the same development standards and permitting processes as the same type of housing in the same zone.

Pursuant to new State law (AB 2162), the Zoning Ordinance will be amended to permit supportive housing by right where multi-family housing (including the Mobile Home Park zoning) is permitted. Other specific provisions include:
o The City is required to notify the developer whether the application is complete within 30 days of receipt of an application to develop supportive housing.
o After the application is complete, the City shall complete its review of the application within 60 days for smaller projects (50 or fewer units) and 120 days for larger projects (more than 50 units).
o The City shall not impose any minimum parking requirements for units occupied by supportive housing residents if the development is located within ½ mile of a public transit stop.

Packet Page 191
25 | CITY OF SEASIDE
● Parking Requirements for Small Residential Care Facilities: State law states that residential care facilities serving six or fewer residents may not be subject to stricter zoning standards than other residential uses. Therefore, the parking requirements in Zoning Ordinance Table 3-8 for residential care facilities should be modified to clarify this requirement. Currently, Table 3-8 does not differentiate parking requirements between small (six or fewer persons) and large facilities and are stricter than those required of other similar residential uses. ● Residential Care Facilities that Do Not Require Licensing: The City’s Zoning Ordinance is silent on residential care facilities that do not require state licensing and therefore does not regulate these uses that are not governed by State laws.

The City will amend the Zoning Code to specify that residential care facilities that do not provide licensable services are permitted as regular residential uses, subject only to the generally applicable, nondiscriminatory health, safety, and zoning laws that apply to similar residential uses in the same zones. ● Use Permit Findings for Licensed Large Residential Care Facilities: Licensed large residential care facilities (of more than six) are permitted via a Use Permit in the RS, RM, RH, and CC zones. In order to obtain a Use Permit the five findings must be found by the Planning Commission (Section 17.62.070 of the Zoning Ordinance. The City will amend finding No. five for licensed large residential care facilities to ensure it is not a constraint.
● Reasonable Accommodations: The City of Seaside currently processes requests for reasonable accommodation for disabled persons via a Minor Use Permit. This procedure is considered potentially constraining to housing for persons with disabilities as the public hearing process before the Zoning Administrator adds time and costs to disabled applicants. The City will amend the reasonable accommodation procedure to provide flexibility in the planning application and development regulations for disabled residents via an administrative procedure.

The procedure will specify eligibility, standards and regulations covered by the reasonable accommodation procedure, and extent of relaxation provided. ● Single-Room Occupancy (SRO): SRO units are one-room units intended for occupancy by a single individual. They are distinct from a studio or efficiency unit, in that a studio is a one-room unit that must contain a kitchen and bathroom.

Although SRO units are not required to have a kitchen or bathroom, many modern SROs have one or the other. Currently, the City’s Zoning Ordinance does not contain provisions for SRO housing. The City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to conditionally permit SRO housing in the Commercial Mixed Use (CMX) zone. The Zoning Ordinance amendment will also include objective design standards to facilitate SRO housing in CMX zone.
● Employee Housing: The California Employee Housing Act requires that housing for six or fewer employees be treated as a regular residential use. The Employee Housing Act further defines housing for agricultural workers consisting of 36 beds or 12 units be treated as an agricultural use and permitted where agricultural uses are permitted. However, the City has no agricultural zones and no zones permit commercial agricultural activities. The City will amend the Zoning Ordinance by 2024 to include provisions for housing for six or fewer employees.

Packet Page 192
26 | CITY OF SEASIDE
● Emergency Shelters: In February 2018, the City amended the Zoning Ordinance to provide for the Category 3 shelters (50 bed max, 300 feet separation, one parking space per staff) to permit emergency shelters by right without discretionary review in the Community Commercial (CC) zone and in Census Tract 137. Census Tract 137 covers Commercial Mixed Use (CMX), CC, and High Density Residential (RH) properties, conforming with AB 2339 requirements that zoning designations identified to allow emergency shelters as a permitted use without a conditional use or other discretionary permit must allow residential uses. Based on the general guidance of new State law AB 2339, an average of 200 square feet of space is recommended per person. With an unsheltered population of 90 and maximum shelter limit of 50 beds, two shelters of up to 10,000 square feet each would be needed to accommodate the City’s unsheltered population. As of 2023, at least 1.9 acres of vacant and underutilized sites are available in the CC zone, adequate to accommodate the City’s unsheltered homeless population of 90 persons as of January 2022. Within Census Tract 137, a range of underutilized commercial and residential properties offer potential for adaptive reuse or new construction of emergency shelters.
o Updates to the Zoning Ordinance must include an updated definition of emergency shelters pursuant to AB 2339 to include other interim interventions, including but not limited to navigation centers, bridge housing, and respite or recuperative care.
o Also, the City conditionally permits for shelters catering to various subpopulations in different residential zones: Category 1 (families or women and children) in RS-8 and R-12 and Category 2 (men and women) in RM zones. Recognizing that regulating these facilities based on gender and familial status constitutes a breach of fair housing laws, the City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to eliminate these categories so that shelters for any household type are conditionally permitted in RS-8, R-12, and RM zones.
● Low Barrier Navigation Center (LBNC): A LBNC is defined as a Housing First, low barrier, temporary, service-enriched shelter focused on helping homeless individuals and families to quickly obtain permanent housing. Low barrier includes best practices to reduce barriers to entry, such as allowing partners, pets, storage of personal items, and privacy (Government Code §65660). AB 101 requires that a LBNC be a use by right in areas zoned for mixed use and nonresidential zones permitting multi-family uses if it meets specified requirements, including: 1) access to permanent housing; 2) use of a coordinated entry system (i.e., the Homeless Management Information System); and 3) use of Housing First according to Welfare and Institutions Code §8255.

Financing: General fund
Responsible Agencies: Community Development/Planning Division Packet Page 193
27 | CITY OF SEASIDE

24.Housing Facilities and Services for the Homeless: The 2022 County Point-in-Time Count of the homeless estimates 90 unsheltered homeless persons in Seaside. The City has established a committee to oversee funds from the General Fund for the provision of services for the homeless. The City also utilizes CDBG funds to support homeless services and facilities.
2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
● Annually, evaluate the homeless needs and gaps in services and facilities and allocate funding via the homeless committee and CDBG program. ● Assist 800 lower income residents and those with special needs annually.

Financing: General fund; CDBG
Responsible Agencies: Community Development
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
A detailed assessment of fair housing in Seaside is located in the Technical Appendix to this Housing Element. The City will undertake a series of actions to further fair housing in the community. These actions are summarized in Table 1 and work in concert with the City’s various housing programs outlined in this Housing Element. Table 1 references actions to specific census tracts. Figure 1 identifies those housing tract geographic boundaries.

25. Fair Housing Outreach and Education: The City will utilize qualified fair housing service providers to conduct outreach and education to the community regarding fair housing. 2023-2031 Timeframe and Objectives:
• Continue to provide CDBG funding to continue ECHO’s work in Seaside. Refer households experiencing housing instability or crisis to the appropriate agency and resources.
• Ensure ECHO’s in-person outreach efforts consider the characteristics of the special needs populations (lower income, Hispanic, elderly, persons with disabilities, language spoken) and their location (Census Tracts 137) by:
o Ensuring in-person outreach is done in CT 137
o Making outreach materials available in Spanish
• Reviewing outreach effectiveness quarterly.
• Update City website to provide bilingual information regarding fair housing rights and resources.
• Update the Zoning Ordinance by 2024 to comply with State housing laws regarding housing for special needs.
• Ensure ECHO includes outreach and education of the State’s Source of Income Protection (SB 329 and SB 222), defining public assistance including HCVs as legitimate source of income for housing.

Financing: General fund; CDBG
Packet Page 194
28 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Responsible Agencies: Community Development
Figure 1: Seaside Neighborhood Census Tract Map
Packet Page 195
29 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Table 1: Summary of AFFH Actions
Program Actions Timing Geographic
targeting Metrics
Outreach and Enforcement
Program 21: Fair
Housing Services
Continue to provide CDBG funding to continue
ECHO’s work in Seaside. Refer households
experiencing housing instability or crisis to
appropriate agencies and resources.

Annually Citywide but ensure
that outreach is
done in an
intentional manner
in 137.

Increase fair housing
inquiries and referrals
based in CT 137 by 10%
Ensure ECHO’s in-person outreach efforts
consider the characteristics of the special
needs populations (lower income, Hispanic,
elderly, persons with disabilities, language
spoken) and their location (Census Tracts 137)
by:
- Ensuring in-person outreach is done in
CT 137
- Making outreach materials available in
Spanish
Reviewing outreach effectiveness quarterly.

Starting Q1
2024
Update City website to provide bilingual
information regarding fair housing rights and
resources.

Ensure website contains a summary of the
Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and
lists the protected characteristics outlined in
this law.

Q1 2024
Update the Zoning Code to comply with State
housing law.

By end of
2024
Citywide Update the City Zoning
Code to adhere with state
housing element law.

Ensure ECHO includes outreach and education
of the protected characteristics under FEHA
as well as the State’s new Source of Income
Protection (SB 329 and SB 222), defining
public assistance including HCVs as legitimate
source of income for housing.
2023-2031 Citywide Increase voucher use by
10%.

And/or decrease
discrimination complaints
Packet Page 196
30 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Program Actions Timing Geographic
targeting Metrics
based on source of
income by 10%.

Encouraging development of new affordable housing in high-resource areas Program 5:

Adequate Sites
for RHNA and ByRight Approval
Pursue adoption of the 2040 General Plan by
2024, providing adequate capacity for the
City’s remaining RHNA of 66 units (47 very
low; 13 low; and 6 moderate income units).
2024 Citywide Meet RHNA targets (86
very low, 55 low, 156
moderate, and 319 above
moderate.

Complete rezoning of sites inventory by 2024
to implement the proposed Land Use policy.
2024 Citywide
Pursue development of future growth areas
and future specific plan areas through specific
or master planning techniques. Ensure that
residential development is considered in these
areas to accommodate the appropriate mix of
future housing needs in the community.
2025-2027 Seaside East
Develop new housing opportunities throughout
the City by supporting the Seaside Housing
Collaborative and identifying additional
potential development partners and sites.

Annually Citywide Pursue development of 141
lower income units.

Program 9:

Accessory
Dwelling Units
Facilitate the development of 112 ADUs over
eight years.

Advertise the availability of Pre-approved ADU
plans.

Provide water rights for deed-restricted ADUs.
2023-2031 Citywide, with
emphasis in lower
density
neighborhoods
Facilitate development of
112 ADUs
Through the CalHome ADU
Loan program, assist ten
low income tenants.

Implement CalHome ADU Loan program 2024 Citywide, with
emphasis in lower
density
neighborhoods
Packet Page 197
31 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Program Actions Timing Geographic
targeting Metrics
Enhancing mobility strategies and promoting inclusion for protected classes Program 11:

Housing Choice
Voucher Program
Program 21: Fair
Housing Outreach
and Education
Landlord outreach to expand the location of
participating voucher properties and increase
mobility of households to tracts closer to
transit by:
• Educating existing landlords in CT 135
and attract new property owners
outside of CT 135.
• Host landlord fairs in city community
centers and listening sessions in
partnership with other Housing CBOs.

Develop outreach and education materials to
combat source-of-income stigma via targeted
outreach campaign.

By the end
of 2024
Citywide, with
emphasis in higher
income areas
Hold at least one landlord
fair/year.

Develop at least one
landlord pamphlet and
infographic by the end of
2024. Distribute to
partners digitally.

Maintain HCV assistance
to 215 households, and
increasing the use of
vouchers by 10% over
eight years
Program 9:

Accessory
Dwelling Units
Inform ADU applicants that ADU units are
subject to SB 329 and SB 222- rental unit
cannot be denied based on source of incomeby posting information on the City website and the ADU application.

Begin Q1
2024
Citywide, with
emphasis in higher
income areas
Facilitate the development
of 112 ADUs over eight
years.

Promote the use of HCVs
for ADUs (target 5 units
over eight years).

Program 10:

Homebuyer
Assistance
Build generational wealth by supporting
homeownership opportunities.
- Continue supporting ECHO First Time
Homebuyer Counseling services in
Seaside.
- In 2024, evaluate continued support for
ECHO or similar service providers
during the Consolidated Plan process.
- Identify and pursue funding sourced
from HCD and HUD, as well as
partnerships with non-profits and
lenders to provide homebuyer
assistance.

Annually Citywide Reinstate Homebuyer
Program and offer
assistance to 10
households.

And/or increase
homeownership rates for
residents in tract 137.

Packet Page 198
32 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Program Actions Timing Geographic
targeting Metrics
Pursue available grant funding resources in
2024 to reinstate the Homebuyer Assistance
Program and include information about the
program in the planned targeted outreach
events in CT 137 if funding is awarded. If
funding is awarded, begin implementation
within one year or according to grant
agreement.

Place-Based Strategies
AFFH Actions:

Community
Development
Invest in improvements in low-income, racially
segregated communities, especially Census
tract 137, by
- Prioritizing basic infrastructure
improvements (e.g., water, sewer)
- Targeting acquisition and rehabilitation
to vacant and blighted properties in
this tract
Prioritize capital improvement projects in this
census Tract 137.
2023-2021 LMI Tracts and
Census Tract 137
One public improvement
project annually.

Conduct proactive community engagement;
continue to educate the community about
health and safety codes via increased
outreach, especially in Census Tract 137.

Begin Q1
2024
Census Tract 137 Resolve 15 percent of
compliant cases in CT 137,
s
Implement the City’s CalHome ADU Loan
Program. Ensure program outreach is
conducted in Census Tract 137.

By Q3 2024 Census Tract 137 Issue ten loans for ten
ADUs for low-income
renters. Have ten
Certificates of Occupancy
issued by the end of the
6th Cycle.

Recruit residents from CT 137 to serve on
boards, committees, task forces and other
local government decision-making bodies.

Begin Q1
2024
CT 137 Provide expanded
advertisements for the
positions to increase
applications from
residents in CT 137.

Packet Page 199
33 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Program Actions Timing Geographic
targeting Metrics
AFFH Actions:

Broadway Avenue
Complete Streets
Project
Begin construction/complete Broadway
Avenue Complete Streets Projects.

Implement non-infrastructure programming
designed to increase the shift to active
transportation modes and long-term behavior
change.

Anticipated
construction
starting in FY
25/26
CT 137 Complete the Broadway
Avenue Complete Streets
Project (one project).

AFFH Actions:

Supportive
Services for
Special Needs
The City of Seaside provides various youth
programs and is continually evaluating
opportunities to expand. Programs include:
- CHAMP Program, administered by the
Seaside Police Department provides
mentorship to Seaside Youth
- Youth Employment Program,
administered by the Seaside Recreation
Department, provides youth ages 15-18
with first time paid job experience
during the summer in conjunction with
resume and job search support.
- Police Youth Diversion Program,
administered by the Seaside Police
Department and Monterey Peninsula
Unified School District prevents youth
from entering the justice system by
providing them with positive
alternatives and counseling.
- VIP Program, administered by the
Recreation Department, provides teens
with an opportunity to gain work
experience and skills while earning
community service hours.
- Workshops: The Seaside Recreation
Department hosts monthly workshops
for local teens. Topics include but are
not limited to Financial Health, Youth
By Q1 2024
Program available
Citywide but with
targeted outreach
to CT 137.

Benefit 1,475 Citywide and
begin tracking enrollment
from children in CT 137 to
ensure access to services.

Packet Page 200
34 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Program Actions Timing Geographic
targeting Metrics
Employment Opportunities, and Job
Readiness.

The City will:
- Continue to engage in bilingual
outreach and provide program
materials in English and Spanish.
- Identify ways to target outreach with
community partners and school sites.

AFFH Actions:

Digital Divide
Taking action to close the digital divide by
considering the needs of residents in Census
Tract 137 if funding becomes available for the
Seaside Broadband Master Plan.

If funding becomes available, Seaside
Broadband Master Plan outreach process to
include active outreach to CT 137.

Pursue
funding
annually
CT 137
ACS 2020 five-year
estimates, 748 households
do not have internet
access (223 of them in CT
137). Reduce the number
of households without
internet access by 50
percent.

Anti-Displacement
AFFH Actions:

Tenant
Protection and
AntiDisplacement
Ensure existing residents in Census Tract 137
can remain and benefit as the neighborhood
improves by:
- Creating a registry of affordable units
available Citywide and posting in the
City website
Inform residents of online registry during
targeted outreach events (by ECHO and during
Parks Master Plan development)
Begin
registry in Q2
2024 and
update on an
ongoing
basis. Utilize
registry to
notify
residents as
part of
outreach
strategy.

CT 137 Create registry by Q2
2024. Update quarterly,
every 3 months, annually.

AFFH Actions:

Economic
Development
Increased housing and jobs opportunities
through the West Broadway Urban Village
Specific Plan (WBUVSP), which encourages
2023-2031 CT 140
Assist 10 minority
businesses with
Packet Page 201
35 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Program Actions Timing Geographic
targeting Metrics
higher density and mixed-use redevelopment,
in CT 140.

Ensure existing businesses in CT 140/WBUVSP
area benefit from redevelopment by:
- Annually conduct on-site multi-lingual
outreach to small businesses. About
two to three times a month, a
dedicated outreach staff member
makes on-site visits to educate small
business owners regarding potential
financing and access to low-cost
capital
- Annually organize Community Business
Meetings on an occasional basis,
sometimes based on a specific topic
and sometimes just to obtain
feedback.
- Increase the visibility of the Economic
Development staff located within the
West Broadway Urban Village.

The City is presently researching potential
providers of technical assistance to small
businesses.
information on how to
improve their businesses
through marketing,
financing, and business
plan information
Assist 5 minority
businesses to relocate to
another location to keep
the business from closing.

Packet Page 202
36 | CITY OF SEASIDE
Quantified Objectives
The following table summarizes the City’s quantified housing objectives for the 2023-2031 planning period.

Table 2: Quantified Objectives for 2023-2031
Extremely
Low Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total
Units to be Constructed 43 43 55 156 319 616
Units to be Rehabilitated 5 5 10 -- -- 20
Units to be Conserved 223 224 -- -- -- 447
Packet Page 203
City of Seaside
2023-2031 Housing Element
Technical Appendix
Draft
July 2023
Revised October 2023
Revised November 2023
Packet Page 204
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-ii
Contents
Section 1: Introduction......................................................................................................................................................1 A. Organization ............................................................................................................................... 1 B. Brief History of Seaside.............................................................................................................. 1 C. Key Issues and Opportunities.....................................................................................................2 Section 2: Housing Needs ................................................................................................................................................3 A. Population Trends and Characteristics ......................................................................................3

1. Population and Age Characteristics ......................................................................................... 3

2. Race and Ethnicity..................................................................................................................... 4 B. Employment Market ...................................................................................................................5 C. Household Type and Characteristics..........................................................................................6

1. Household Income..................................................................................................................... 6

2. Household Types ....................................................................................................................... 8 D. Housing Stock Characteristics....................................................................................................8

1. Housing Stock ............................................................................................................................ 9

2. Unit Type and Size..................................................................................................................... 9

3. Age of Housing Units ............................................................................................................... 10

4. Housing Conditions.................................................................................................................. 10

5. Code Enforcement Activities .................................................................................................. 10

6. Housing Tenure and Vacancy.................................................................................................. 11 E. Housing Market ........................................................................................................................13

1. Home Prices ............................................................................................................................. 13

2. Rental Rates............................................................................................................................. 14

3. Housing Affordability............................................................................................................... 14 F. Housing Issues ......................................................................................................................... 17

1. Overcrowding ........................................................................................................................... 17

2. Cost Burden ............................................................................................................................. 18 G. Special Needs Groups ..............................................................................................................19

1. Seniors...................................................................................................................................... 20

2. Persons with Disabilities ......................................................................................................... 21

3. Large Households .................................................................................................................... 23

4. Single-Parent Female-Headed Families................................................................................. 23

5. Homelessness.......................................................................................................................... 24

6. Farmworkers............................................................................................................................ 28

7. Military Personnel .................................................................................................................... 28

8. College Students ..................................................................................................................... 29

9. Extremely Low Income Households ....................................................................................... 30 H. Publicly Assisted Rental Housing ............................................................................................ 30

1. Tenant-Based Housing Choice Vouchers ............................................................................... 30

2. Project-Based Rental Housing Assistance ............................................................................. 30

3. Units at Risk of Converting to Market Rate ........................................................................... 31 I. Estimates of Existing Housing Need........................................................................................ 32 Section 3: Housing Constraints.....................................................................................................................................34 A. Nongovernmental Constraints................................................................................................. 34

1. Market Constraints .................................................................................................................. 34

2. Community Response to Intensification................................................................................ 37 B. Governmental Constraints .......................................................................................................37

1. Land Use Controls ................................................................................................................... 37

2. West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan .......................................................................... 39

3. Inclusionary Housing Program ................................................................................................ 40 Packet Page 205
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-iii

4. Residential Development Standards ...................................................................................... 42

5. Flexibility from Development Standards ............................................................................... 48

6. Cumulative Analysis of Land Use Controls- Seaside Market................................................ 48

7. Coastal Zone............................................................................................................................ 52

8. Provisions for a Variety of Housing Types.............................................................................. 53

9. Housing for Persons with Disabilities..................................................................................... 58

10. Development Permit Procedures and Processing Times....................................................... 61

11. Planning and Development Fees ............................................................................................ 67

12. On- and Off-Site Improvements ............................................................................................ 70

13. Building Codes and Enforcement ........................................................................................... 71 C. Environmental/Infrastructure Constraints ...............................................................................72

1. Protected Habitat .................................................................................................................... 72

2. Tree Ordinance ........................................................................................................................ 72

3. Hazardous and Toxic Sites...................................................................................................... 72

4. Infrastructure........................................................................................................................... 72

5. Water Supply ........................................................................................................................... 72

6. Sanitary Sewer......................................................................................................................... 74

7. Energy Conservation................................................................................................................ 74 Section 4: Housing Resources.......................................................................................................................................76 A. Future Housing Needs ............................................................................................................. 76

1. Regional Housing Needs Allocation ........................................................................................ 76

2. Credits toward RHNA .............................................................................................................. 76 B. Inventory of Sites .................................................................................................................... 82

1. Vacant and Underutilized Sites Inventory Selection............................................................. 82

2. Development Trends ............................................................................................................... 85

3. Estimating Development Potential......................................................................................... 90

4. Lot Consolidation .................................................................................................................... 91

5. Sites to Accommodate Lower Income RHNA ........................................................................ 92

6. Sites to Accommodate Moderate Income RHNA................................................................... 99

7. Adequacy of Sites Inventory ................................................................................................. 110

8. Availability of Water .............................................................................................................. 113

9. Availability of Infrastructure ................................................................................................. 114

10. Future Residential Development Potential.......................................................................... 114

11. Parcel-by-Parcel Sites Inventory.......................................................................................... 114 C. Financial Resources ................................................................................................................121

1. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds ........................................................ 121

2. Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fund....................................................................................... 121

3. Permanent Local Housing Allocation ................................................................................... 121

4. Public Financing..................................................................................................................... 121 D. Partnership Resources ...........................................................................................................122 Section 5: Evaluation of Adopted Housing Element ..............................................................................................124 A. Accomplishments of Adopted Housing Element ....................................................................124 B. Quantified Objectives .............................................................................................................136 Section 6: Community Engagement........................................................................................................................... 137 A. Draft Housing Element Engagement ......................................................................................137

1. Farmer’s Market Informational Booth.................................................................................. 137

2. Community Workshops ......................................................................................................... 138

3. Response to Outreach Comments ....................................................................................... 139

4. Response to Written Comments .......................................................................................... 139

5. Supplementary Records........................................................................................................ 146 B. Stakeholder Interviews...........................................................................................................162 Packet Page 206
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-iv

1. Strengths, Issues and Challenges, and Opportunities......................................................... 164

2. Summary by Stakeholder Group........................................................................................... 165

3. Participating Stakeholders .................................................................................................... 170

4. Interview Questionnaire ........................................................................................................ 171 C. Seaside Chats…......................................................................................................................172 D. Planning Commission .............................................................................................................172 E. Internet Survey.......................................................................................................................173 F. Community Engagement during Coronavirus .........................................................................173 Section 7: AFFH..............................................................................................................................................................176 A. Introduction and Overview of AB 686 ....................................................................................176 B. Analysis Requirements ...........................................................................................................176

1. Sources of Information ......................................................................................................... 177

2. Fair Housing Defined ............................................................................................................. 177

3. Housing Issues, Affordability, and Fair Housing .................................................................. 178 C. Geography ..............................................................................................................................178

1. Monterey County ................................................................................................................... 178

2. Seaside ................................................................................................................................... 178 D. Assessment of Fair Housing....................................................................................................181

1. Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity ............................................................. 181

2. Segregation and Integration.................................................................................................. 196

3. Racially Concentrated Areas................................................................................................. 218

4. Access to Opportunities........................................................................................................ 221

5. Disproportionate Housing Needs .......................................................................................... 240 E. Local Knowledge ................................................................................................................... 254

1. History of Seaside Development .......................................................................................... 254

2. Broadway Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Project ........................................................ 256

3. 2019 Monterey County’s Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 2019 .............. 256 F. Summary of Fair Housing Issues ........................................................................................... 257

1. Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach............................................................................. 257

2. Segregation and Integration.................................................................................................. 258

3. Racially Concentrated Areas of Poverty and Affluence ...................................................... 258

4. Access to Opportunities........................................................................................................ 258

5. Disproportionate Housing Needs .......................................................................................... 259 G. Summary of Fair housing Issues and Identification and Prioritization of Contributing Factors260 H. Sites Inventory Strategy ........................................................................................................ 262

1. Distribution of RHNA Units ................................................................................................... 268 Packet Page 207
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-v
Tables
Table App-1: Population Change .......................................................................................................................3 Table App-2: Age Characteristics......................................................................................................................4 Table App-3: Race and Ethnicity.......................................................................................................................5 Table App-4: Occupations ................................................................................................................................5 Table App-5: Mean Annual Salary by Occupation, Salinas MSA........................................................................6 Table App-6: Median Household Income ..........................................................................................................7 Table App-7: Distribution by Income Group (2015-2019) ..................................................................................8 Table App-8: Changes in Household Type ........................................................................................................8 Table App-9: Housing Units by Type................................................................................................................ 9 Table App-10: Unit Size by Tenure (2016-2020) – City of Seaside ................................................................... 9 Table App-11: Housing Age ..............................................................................................................................10 Table App-12: Units Lacking Plumbing or Complete Kitchen Facilities (2020)................................................10 Table App-13: Summary of Neighborhood Conditions......................................................................................11 Table App-14: Tenure and Vacancy Rates........................................................................................................11 Table App-15: Median Home Price – November 2016 to August 2022.............................................................13 Table App-16: Home Listing Prices in Seaside (2022) .....................................................................................14 Table App-17: Rental Rates (October 2022) ....................................................................................................14 Table App-18: Housing Affordability by Income Level.....................................................................................15 Table App-19: Overcrowded Housing ..............................................................................................................18 Table App-20: Housing Overpayment..............................................................................................................19 Table App-21: Special Needs Groups ............................................................................................................. 20 Table App-22: Licensed Community Care Facilities........................................................................................ 21 Table App-23: Disabilities .............................................................................................................................. 22 Table App-24: Large Households by Tenure (2016-2020) .............................................................................. 23 Table App-25: Households by Type................................................................................................................ 24 Table App-26: Homeless Population, Monterey County................................................................................. 26 Table App-27: Homeless Service Providers in Seaside ...................................................................................27 Table App-28: Extremely Low-Income Household Problems by HH Type ..................................................... 30 Table App-29: Inventory of Assisted Rental Housing...................................................................................... 31 Table App-30: Estimating Housing Needs...................................................................................................... 33 Table App-31: Disposition of Home Loans - 2021........................................................................................... 36 Table App-32: Land Use Designations and Zoning Implementation............................................................... 39 Table App-33: Residential Development Standards....................................................................................... 43 Table App-34: Parking Standards................................................................................................................... 47 Table App-35: Residential Uses Permitted in Major Zones ............................................................................ 53 Table App-36: Approval Required .................................................................................................................. 63 Table App-37: Permit Process........................................................................................................................ 63 Table App-38: Comparison of Planning Fees ................................................................................................. 68 Table App-39: Planning and Development Fees Collected by Other Agencies............................................... 69 Table App-40: Regional Housing Needs Share for Seaside............................................................................. 76 Table App-41: Summary of Credits toward RHNA...........................................................................................77 Table App-42: ADU Trends (2018-2022)..........................................................................................................77 Table App-43: Size and Cost of Studio, 1-BR, and 2-BR Rentals – Seaside and Surrounding Areas.............. 78 Table App-44: Campus Town Units Expected by Income Level..................................................................... 82 Table App-45: Summary of Credits toward RHNA ......................................................................................... 82 Table App-46: Development Potential in West Broadway Urban Village Plan................................................ 85 Table App-48: Proposed vs Existing General Plan Land Use Designations and Densities.............................. 90 Table App-49: Lower Income Sites- Vacant vs Underutilized- Existing General Plan ................................... 92 Table App-50: Lower Income Sites- Vacant vs Underutilized- Proposed General Plan................................. 92 Table App-51: Moderate Income Sites – Existing General Plan...................................................................... 99 Table App-52: Moderate Income Sites – Proposed General Plan................................................................... 99 Table App-53: Sixth Cycle Sites Inventory – Existing General Plan ............................................................... 111 Packet Page 208
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-vi
Table App-54: Sixth Cycle Sites Inventory – Proposed General Plan............................................................. 111 Table App-55: Parcel-by-Parcel Site Characteristics- Existing General Plan.................................................116 Table App-56: Parcel-by-Parcel Site Characteristics- Proposed General Plan ..............................................117 Table App-58: Summary of Program Accomplishments ...............................................................................126 Table App-59: ECHO Services Provided (2019-2022) ....................................................................................183 Table App-60: Tenant/Landlord Inquiries .....................................................................................................184 Table App-61: Basis for Discrimination Cases (2019-2021)............................................................................184 Table App-62: Outcome of Discrimination Cases .........................................................................................184 Table App-63: Summary of Accomplishments..............................................................................................185 Table App-64: Basis for Discrimination of Cases filed with HUD – Monterey County (2012-2017) ...............187 Table App-65: Disposition of Fair Housing Cases Filed with HUD - Monterey County (2012-2017)...............187 Table App-66: Basis for Discrimination of Complaints filed with DFEH - Monterey County (2012-2017)......188 Table App-67: Acts of Discrimination for Complaints Filed with DFEH – Monterey County (2012-2017)......189 Table App-68: Disposition of Fair Housing Complaints Filed with DFEH – Monterey County (2012-2017)....189 Table App-69: Complaints filed with DFEH – Seaside (2012-2017)...............................................................189 Table App-70: Clients Served by Race – ECHO Housing (2017).....................................................................190 Table App-71: Complaints by Protected Classification – ECHO Housing (2017) ............................................190 Table App-72: Findings and Disposition – ECHO Housing (2017) ..................................................................190 Table App-73: Fair Housing Audits – Minority Names (FY 2017)....................................................................192 Table App-74: Fair Housing Audits – Linguistic Profiling (FY 2019)...............................................................192 Table App-75: Fair Housing Audits – Source of Income Protection (FY 2020)..............................................192 Table App-76: Fair Housing Audits – Sexual Orientation (FY 2021)...............................................................193 Table App-77: ECHO Seaside Client Households (2019-2021) .......................................................................194 Table App-78: Zoning Provisions for Special Needs Housing ........................................................................195 Table App-79: Race/Ethnicity- Monterey County..........................................................................................197 Table App-80: Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Indices for Monterey County.......................................................197 Table App-81: Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Indices for Seaside ......................................................................201 Table App-82: Population with a Disability..................................................................................................204 Table App-83: Households with Children under the Age of 18 ....................................................................206 Table App-84: Income Category Definitions .................................................................................................210 Table App-85: Income Distribution – Regional .............................................................................................210 Table App-86: Domains and List of Indicators for Opportunity Maps ..........................................................221 Table App-87: Domains and List of Indicators for Opportunity Maps.......................................................... 222 Table App-88: Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity............................................................................. 225 Table App-89: Housing Problems by Race, Monterey County ......................................................................240 Table App-90: Housing Problems, Elderly and Large Households, Monterey County................................... 242 Table App-91: Housing Problems by Race, Seaside...................................................................................... 242 Table App-92: Housing Problems, Elderly and Large Households, Seaside.................................................. 245 Table App-93: Overcrowded Households-Monterey County ........................................................................ 245 Table App-94: Overcrowded Households – Seaside .................................................................................... 247 Table App-95: Homeless Population, Monterey County............................................................................... 252 Table App-96: Summary of Issues and Identification and Prioritization of Contributing Factors................260 Table App-97: RHNA Distribution by Tract Characteristics.......................................................................... 270 Table App-98: RHNA Unit Distribution by % Minority Concentration............................................................271 Table App-99: RHNA Distribution by Percent Population with Disabilities .................................................. 273 Table App-100: RHNA Unit Distribution by % of Children in Single Female-Headed Households ................ 275 Table App-101: RHNA Unit Distribution by LMI Population........................................................................... 277 Table App-102: RHNA Unit Distribution by TCAC Opportunity Resource Area ............................................. 279 Table App-103: RHNA Unit Distribution by Cost-Burdened Renter Households............................................281 Table App-104: RHNA Unit Distribution by Cost-Burdened Owner Households............................................281 Table App-105: RHNA Unit Distribution by % Overcrowded Households......................................................284 Table App-106: RHNA Distribution by Vulnerable Communities .................................................................. 287 Packet Page 209
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-vii
Figures
Figure App-1: Renter-Occupied Housing .........................................................................................................12 Figure App-2: Income Needed to Rent or Own Compared to Earnings by Occupation................................... 17 Figure App-3: Overcrowded Housing by Tenure..............................................................................................18 Figure App-4: Housing Cost Burden by Income Level and Tenure..................................................................19 Figure App-5: West Broadway Urban Village SP – Land Use Designations .................................................... 40 Figure App-7: Permitting Process for Single-Family Detached Housing..........................................................61 Figure App-8: Permitting Process for Single-Family Attached Housing ......................................................... 62 Figure App-9: Permitting Process for Multi-Family Housing .......................................................................... 62 Figure App-10: Campus Town Phasing and Timing......................................................................................... 80 Figure App-11: Campus Town Specific Plan.....................................................................................................81 Figure App-12: Seaside Recent Projects......................................................................................................... 86 Figure App-16: Site H – Lower Income Site ................................................................................................... 93 Figure App-17: Site K – Lower Income Site.................................................................................................... 94 Figure App-18: Moderate Income Sites within West Broadway Specific Plan ...............................................100 Figure App-19: Mixed-Use Low Moderate Income Sites................................................................................102 Figure App-20: Neighborhood General Sites .................................................................................................104 Figure App-22: 2007 Zoning Map ..................................................................................................................179 Figure App-23: Seaside Neighborhoods ........................................................................................................180 Figure App-25: Minority Population - Region ................................................................................................199 Figure App-26: Predominant Population - Region........................................................................................200 Figure App-27: Minority Population – Seaside ............................................................................................. 202 Figure App-28: Predominant Hispanic Population- Seaside......................................................................... 202 Figure App-29: Population with a Disability- Region.................................................................................... 205 Figure App-30: Population with Disability- Seaside.....................................................................................206 Figure App-31: Percent of Children in Single Female-Headed Households- Region..................................... 207 Figure App-32: Percent Children in Single Female-Headed Households – Seaside.....................................209 Figure App-33: Low and Moderate Income Population – Region ...................................................................211 Figure App-34: Low and Moderate Income Population- Seaside ..................................................................212 Figure App-35: Poverty Status by Tract- Seaside .........................................................................................212 Figure App-36: Housing Choice Voucher Concentration – Regional..............................................................214 Figure App-37: Housing Choice Voucher Concentration – Seaside...............................................................215 Figure App-38: Median Gross Rent and Poverty Status – Seaside................................................................216 Figure App-39: Public Housing Buildings – Monterey County .......................................................................217 Figure App-40: Public Housing Buildings – Seaside......................................................................................218 Figure App-41: Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) – Region.........................219 Figure App-42: RCAAs- Regional.................................................................................................................. 220 Figure App-43: Median Household Income by Tract (ACS 2017-2021).......................................................... 220 Figure App-44: TCAC Composite Score- Region .......................................................................................... 222 Figure App-45: TCAC/HCD Opportunity Areas in the- City of Seaside......................................................... 223 Figure App-46: TCAC Education Score- Region ........................................................................................... 226 Figure App-47: GreatSchools Summary Ratings .......................................................................................... 228 Figure App-48: TCAC Education Scores- Seaside........................................................................................ 228 Figure App-49: HPI- Bachelor’s Education or Higher ................................................................................... 229 Figure App-50: Transit Service in Seaside ....................................................................................................231 Figure App-51: AllTransit Performance Score- Seaside.................................................................................231 Figure App-52: HPI – Automobile Access .................................................................................................... 232 Figure App-53: HPI – Active Commuting...................................................................................................... 233 Figure App-54: HUD Jobs Proximity Index- Region...................................................................................... 234 Figure App-55: TCAC Economic Score- Region............................................................................................ 234 Figure App-56: Jobs Proximity Index- Seaside ............................................................................................ 235 Figure App-57: TCAC Economic Score- Seaside .......................................................................................... 236 Figure App-58: TCAC Environmental Score- Region .................................................................................... 237 Packet Page 210
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-viii
Figure App-59: TCAC Environmental Score- Seaside................................................................................... 238 Figure App-60: Parks in Seaside .................................................................................................................. 239 Figure App-61: HPI – Park Access ................................................................................................................ 239 Figure App-62: Cost Burdened Owners (2019) – Region ...............................................................................241 Figure App-63: Cost Burdened Renters (2019) – Region ...............................................................................241 Figure App-64: Cost Burdened Owners (2014)- Seaside .............................................................................. 243 Figure App-65: Cost Burdened Owners (2019)- Seaside .............................................................................. 243 Figure App-66: Cost Burdened Renters (2014) – Seaside ............................................................................244 Figure App-67: Cost Burdened Renters (2019) – Seaside.............................................................................244 Figure App-68: Overcrowded Households- Region ......................................................................................246 Figure App-69: Overcrowded Housing – Seaside ......................................................................................... 247 Figure App-70: Median Year Units Built .......................................................................................................248 Figure App-71: Sensitive Communities - Region ..........................................................................................249 Figure App-72: Sensitive Communities - Seaside ........................................................................................ 250 Figure App-74: Seaside Historical Build-Out Areas...................................................................................... 256 Figure App-76: Major Strategies in General Plan 2040................................................................................. 265 Figure App-77: Seaside Site Inventory .........................................................................................................266 Figure App-78: RHNA Distribution by Minority Concentration...................................................................... 272 Figure App-79: RHNA Distribution by Percent Population with a Disability ................................................. 273 Figure App-80: RHNA Distribution by Percent Children in Single Female-Headed Households................... 275 Figure App-81: RHNA Distribution by Percent Low and Moderate Income Population................................. 277 Figure App-82: RHNA Distribution by TCAC Opportunity Resource Level .................................................... 279 Figure App-83: RHNA Distribution by Percent Cost-Burdened Renter Households ......................................281 Figure App-84: RHNA Distribution by Percent Cost-Burdened Owner Households ..................................... 282 Figure App-85: RHNA Distribution by Percent Overcrowded Households....................................................284 Figure App-86: RHNA Distribution by Vulnerable Communities...................................................................288 Packet Page 211
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-1
Section 1: Introduction
This Technical Appendix is a companion document to the 2023-2031 Seaside Housing Element.

The Technical Appendix contains all the detailed research and analyses to assess the housing needs in Seaside, and the constraints and opportunities for addressing those needs.

A. Organization
This Housing Element Technical Appendix consists of the following sections:
• Introduction (Section 1): Provides an overview of the Housing Element requirements and summarizes key issues to be addressed in the Element
• Housing Needs (Section 2): Describes the City’s population characteristics, housing characteristics, and existing housing needs
• Housing Constraints (Section 3): Assesses potential market, governmental, and environmental constraints to the development, maintenance, and improvement of housing
• Housing Resources (Section 4): Evaluates land, financial, and administrative resources to address housing needs in the community
• Evaluation of Adopted Housing Element (Section 5): Reviews and analyzes progress made in achieving housing goals in the last Housing Element
• Community Engagement (Section 6): Describes efforts to engage the community throughout the housing element process
• Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (Section 7): Includes the Housing Element requirements established by AB 686 to affirmatively further fair housing including an assessment of fair housing, the identification and prioritization of significant contributing factors to segregation, R/ECAPS, opportunity access, and disproportionate housing needs.

Meaningful actions to address disparities and needs found in the AFFH are found in the Housing Plan.

B. Brief History of Seaside
Incorporated in 1954, Seaside is one of seven cities on the Monterey Peninsula. Nearby cities include Marina, Del Rey Oaks, Monterey, and Carmel-by-the-Sea. Overlooking Monterey Bay, the City was developed as a primarily single-family community in the 1950s and 1960s. Seaside’s proximity to the former Fort Ord, climate, and range of housing options have made the community a very desirable place to live. Many people who were attracted to the area for employment and other opportunities related to the former Fort Ord military base chose to remain in the City even after the closure of Fort Ord in 1994. Additional growth and rising housing prices throughout the Peninsula, as well as the opening and expansion of the California State University at Monterey Bay, have placed additional demands on the City’s housing stock.

The Fort Ord military base was expanded between 1968 and 1978 during the height of the Vietnam War, and, subsequently, the mobilization of the Seventh Infantry Division. This expansion created a great demand for housing, particularly for the non-commissioned officers and enlisted personnel who were unable to secure housing on base. Seaside and Marina, as the adjoining cities, faced an increased rate of development during that time to meet this housing demand of an expanding military base. As a result, Seaside produced a significant amount of low-cost housing for the military personnel. This housing demand was eased somewhat when the Army built more housing on base in the late 1980s. However, workers in the hospitality and other service industries have replaced the military personnel in Seaside where the majority of the affordable housing on the Monterey Peninsula could be found. Even with the base closure at Fort Ord, Seaside continues to provide the bulk of the most affordable housing on the Monterey Peninsula. The closure of Fort Ord and the continuing growth of California State University Packet Page 212
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-2
Monterey Bay (CSUMB), as well as the decrease in available land, have brought new opportunities and challenges for Seaside.

C. Key Issues and Opportunities
• Demographic shifts. Several shifts in the City’s population and household compositions have implications on housing demand (see Section 2, Housing Needs, of this Housing Technical Appendix). Specifically:
o Decreased adults in the family-forming age (25-44) due to the rising housing costs and limited employment opportunities;
o Increased senior population (65+); and
o Increased single households, including seniors living alone. o These trends typically lead to the demand for smaller housing units, alternative housing options, and options for rental housing.
• Housing problems relating to housing age, cost burden and overcrowding. o At least 80% of the housing stock is more than 30 years old, the age when rehabilitation or substantial repairs may be needed.
o About 75% of the housing stock comprised single-family homes, with 39% of the households being owner-households. This implies that a significant portion of the City’s single-family homes are being used as rentals. Prevalence of absentee landlords may present issues with deferred maintenance. o While both home prices and rents are increasing, renter-households are disproportionately impacted by housing problems such as cost burden (paying more than 30% of income on housing) and overcrowding (with more than one person per room). Approximately 63% of the renter-households versus 28% of the owner-households are experiencing housing cost burden. Overcrowding is also more prevalent among renter-households at 17% compared to 5% of overcrowded owner-households.
• Mismatch between housing preferences and available housing types. The Seaside housing market does not provide sufficient housing that is affordable to lower income households such as those with service occupation jobs or CSUMB students, staff, and recent graduates. The primarily single-family housing stock also does not offer a variety of housing types to accommodate the community’s increasingly diverse housing needs. • Water supply. The Monterey Peninsula has long faced water supply challenges that have hindered new residential development opportunities. All available water has been allocated. This Housing Element includes a program for the City to pursue other strategies for additional water.
• Future Residential Development. This General Plan update offers an opportunity to reexamine the City’s land use policies and seek strategies for preserving and improving the City’s low and medium density single-family neighborhoods on the one hand and increasing the potential of infill residential development in medium to high density focus areas. Areas with residential development potential include:
o Parcels within the West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan are designated for a range of residential densities. Up to 60 units per acre is allowed and mixed use project must have a minimum density of 30 units per acre. o Mixed use opportunities along East Broadway Boulevard corridor and Fremont Boulevard corridor.
o The Long Range Property Management Plan of the Seaside Successor Agency identifies a number of agency-owned properties that may be disposed of for development in the future (discussed further later). Six of those properties are identified as potential sites with residential/mixed use development potential. One has already been acquired by a developer to construct a 106-unit Ascent project. o Seaside East future growth area and future specific plan area offer long-range residential growth potential for single-family, multi-family, and mixed-use housing.

Packet Page 213
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-3
Section 2: Housing Needs
This section analyzes population and housing characteristics to identify the City’s specific housing needs. Programs to address these needs are contained in the Housing Element.

A. Population Trends and Characteristics
Population characteristics affect the type and extent of housing need. Population growth, age profile, race/ethnicity, employment, household income, and other factors influence the type of housing needed and ability to afford housing.

1. Population and Age Characteristics
Seaside’s population trends and age characteristics are closely tied to the City’s links with two major institutions – the former Fort Ord and the California State University at Monterey Bay (CSUMB). Overlooking Monterey Bay, the City was developed as a primarily single-family community in the 1950s and 1960s. Since incorporation of the City in 1954, Seaside’s proximity to the former Fort Ord, climate, and range of housing options have attracted a variety of residents to the community. For example, population growth and age characteristics during the 1960s and 1970s were closely tied to expansion and mobilization of Seventh Infantry training at Fort Ord.

Although the closure of the base in 1993 led to a reduction in overall population in the community, many people who were attracted to the area for employment and other opportunities related to the military base chose to remain in the City even after the base closure. Later, regional growth and rising housing prices throughout the Peninsula, as well as the opening and expansion of CSUMB, have attracted additional residents to Seaside due to its more affordable housing market. Evaluating these historic and recent population and age trends in Seaside provides a basis for understanding and addressing future housing needs.

The closure of the Fort Ord Military Base contributed to Seaside’s population decline in the 1990s. One way to analyze the impact of the base closure on population trends is to look at the change in the population living in group quarters and the age of residents. The population living in group quarters dropped from 5,913 in 1990 to 103 by 2000, mirroring a 60% decline in the 18 to 24 age group in Seaside. This trend has been somewhat moderated by the influx of students to CSUMB since 1995. By 2010, the population in group quarters had climbed back up to 1,127 persons, and adults in the 18 to 24 age group had increased by 26% since 2000. The population in group quarters has remained the same in the last 10 years. The 2020 Census estimates a group quarters population of 1,180 persons in Seaside.

Seaside continues to be the most populated city (32,068 residents) on the Monterey Peninsula.

While the City had a 3.2% increase in population from 2010 to 2016, its population has decreased by 5.9% since the 2016 midterm update to the Housing Element. Table App-1 summarizes population change from 2010 to 2022 for cities on the Monterey Peninsula and Monterey County.

All the Peninsula cities as well as the County’s overall population have decreased over the last 6 years, with Carmel seeing the greatest decrease (21%) since 2016.

Table App-1: Population Change
Jurisdiction
2010
Census
2016
DOF*
2022
DOF*
Percent Change
2010-2016 2016-2022
Carmel 3,722 3,833 3,041 3.0% -20.7%
Del Rey Oaks 1,624 1,666 1,539 2.6% -7.6%
Monterey 27,810 28,610 28,082 2.9% -1.8%
Pacific Grove 15,041 15,352 14,761 2.1% -3.8%
Sand City 334 381 372 14.1% -2.4%
Seaside 33,025 34,071 32,068 3.2% -5.9%
Total Peninsula Cities 81,556 83,913 79,863 2.9% -4.8%
Packet Page 214
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-4
Table App-1: Population Change
Jurisdiction
2010
Census
2016
DOF*
2022
DOF*
Percent Change
2010-2016 2016-2022
County of Monterey 415,057 437,178 433,716 5.3% -0.8%
*DOF = California Department of Finance
Sources: Bureau of the Census, 2010; State Department of Finance, 2016, 2022 Population Estimates.

Seaside has experienced a significant increase in the population of middle-aged adults and seniors, particularly since 2014. Between 2014 and 2020, the population aged 45 to 54 increased by 14%, while the population aged 55 to 64 increased 40% (Table App-2). Middle-aged adults between 45 and 64 are typically at the peak of their careers, earning higher wages and may seek to purchase higher end, larger single-family homes.

Seniors are more likely to need assistance with daily needs, transportation, and health care, as well as accessible housing. Reduced incomes and increasing health care costs also make affordability a key issue for senior housing. Seniors comprised approximately 9% of Seaside’s population in 2010, and the proportion of seniors increased to 12.5% as of 2020. Seniors aged 65 to 74 and 75-and-older saw the largest percentage increase of any age group between 2014 and 2020 (43% and 42%, respectively). In general, the City’s population continues to age, with median age rising from 30.6 in 2010 to 33.8 in 2020. The 2016-2020 ACS estimates an age profile for the City that reflects the continual maturing of the population and reduction in the number of children under the age of 18 and in young adults between 18 and 24.

Table App-2: Age Characteristics
Age Group
2010 Census 2014 ACS 2020 ACS Percent Change
Number of
Persons
Percent of
Total
Number of
Persons
Percent of
Total
Number of
Persons
Percent of
Total 2010-2014 2014-2020
< 18 8,923 27.0% 9,043 26.8% 7,932 23.3% 1.3% -12.3%
18 - 24 4,428 13.4% 4,127 12.2% 4,015 11.8% -6.8% -2.7% 25 – 34 5,501 16.7% 5,553 16.5% 5,646 16.6% 0.9% 1.7%
35 - 44 4,653 14.1% 5,414 16.1% 3,986 11.7% 16.4% -26.4% 45- 54 3,858 11.7% 3,809 11.3% 4,325 12.7% -1.3% 13.5%
55 – 64 2,817 8.5% 2,824 8.4% 3,940 11.6% 0.2% 39.5%
65 - 74 1,413 4.3% 1,609 4.8% 2,306 6.8% 13.9% 43.3%
75+ 1,432 4.3% 1,351 4.4% 1,913 5.6% -5.7% 41.6%
Total 33,025 100.0% 33,729 100.0% 34,063 100.0% 2.1% 1.0% Median Age 30.6 31.6 33.8 3.3% 7.0%
Sources: Bureau of the Census, 2010; and American Community Survey, 2010-2014 and 2016-2020 Estimates.

2. Race and Ethnicity
Demographic changes and the Fort Ord base closure have impacted the City’s racial-ethnic distribution. Changes in the City’s racial-ethnic composition may have implications upon the City’s housing needs. Different ethnic groups and communities may have varying household characteristics and overall income levels that in turn impact housing expectations and demand.

Understanding changes in the racial-ethnic composition of Seaside residents provides a basis for addressing housing needs. For example, research has shown that Hispanic/Latino households often have lower incomes than other racial-ethnic groups and tend to have greater household expenses due to a larger average family size. Thus, Hispanic households may have more difficulty finding adequately sized and affordable housing and may be at greater risk of overpayment and/or overcrowding than other racial-ethnic groups.

In 2000, Hispanic households comprised 35% of Seaside’s population while White households made up 36% of the population. A nearly identical increase in the Hispanic population also occurred throughout Monterey County, suggesting a regional demographic shift. By 2010, Hispanics made up 43% of the population in Seaside, surpassing the White population (33%) as Packet Page 215
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-5
the predominant racial-ethnic group. The Hispanic population has continued to increase slightly since 2010 to 15,265 individuals in 2020 (45% of the total population). The Black population has declined slightly since 2010, from 2,603 individuals in 2010 to 2,409 individuals in 2020. Seaside’s Asian population has also decreased slightly, from 3,100 in 2010 to approximately 3,317 in 2020.

Since 2014, racial composition of the City has only changed marginally. The share of all races has not changed by more than 2%.

Table App-3: Race and Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity
2010 Census 2014 ACS 2020 ACS % Change
Persons Percent Persons Percent Persons Percent 2010-2014 2014-2020 White, not Hispanic 10,725 32.5% 10,532 31.2% 10,368 30.4% -1.8% -1.6% Hispanic/Latino1 14,347 43.4% 14,509 43.0% 15,265 44.8% 1.1% 5.2% Asian, not Hispanic 3,100 9.4% 3,385 10.0% 3,317 9.7% 9.2% -2.0% Black, not Hispanic 2,603 7.9% 2,730 8.1% 2,449 7.2% 4.9% -10.3% All other races, not Hispanic 665 2.0% 710 2.1% 1,072 3.1% 6.8% 51.0% Two or more races, not
Hispanic2 1,585 4.8% 1,650 4.9% 1,592 4.7% 4.1% -3.5%
Total 33,025 100.0% 33,729 100.0% 34,063 100.0% 2.1% 1.0%

1. Includes persons of any race who identified Hispanic ethnicity.

2. 2010 Census (unlike other years) allowed respondents to identify themselves under more than one racial group.

Source: Bureau of the Census, 2010; and American Community Survey, 2010-2014 and 2016-2020 Estimates.

B. Employment Market
The closure of the Fort Ord military base undoubtedly contributed to a decline in the overall employment level in Seaside from 1990 to 2010. In 1990, 22,617 people were in the labor force with an unemployment rate of about 4%. By 2000, the labor force had declined to 14,970 persons with an unemployment rate of about 5%. Seaside continued to see a decline in its labor force during the early 2000s. According to the 2010-2014 American Community Survey (ACS), Seaside’s labor force was comprised of 14,561 persons with an unemployment rate of about 10%. However, the City’s labor force increased between 2014 and 2020. As of 2020, the ACS estimated a labor force of 17,576 and an unemployment rate of 4.1%.

The Census reported that the number of people employed in the Armed Forces in Seaside declined by 7,209 persons from 1990 to 2000, roughly equivalent to the overall decline in the City’s labor force during that period. According to the ACS, between 2016 and 2020 the number of Seaside residents in the Armed Forces had declined to just 699 persons. In August 2022, the State Employment Development Department estimated Seaside’s unemployment rate at approximately 2.7% – an improvement from the unemployment rate estimated by the 2016-2020 ACS.

Table App-4 summarizes the occupations held by Seaside residents between 2016 and 2020.

Approximately 35% of residents were employed in service occupations, while another 26% held management, professional, sales, and office occupations. The proportion of residents holding service occupations in Seaside was almost double the proportion for Monterey County as a whole. However, the County has a significantly larger portion of residents employed in Farming/Fishing/Forestry occupations.

Table App-4: Occupations
Occupation
Percent of City-Employed
Civilian Population
Percent of County-Employed
Civilian Population
Management/Professional 26.4% 30.4%
Service 34.7% 19.5%
Sales/Office 20.3% 19.0%
Construction/Extraction/Maintenance 9.3% 19.4%
Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing 0.9% 15.9%
Packet Page 216
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-6
Production/Transportation 9.4% 11.8%
Total 15,764 188,734
Source: American Community Survey, 2016-2020 estimates.

Table App-5 lists the mean annual salary by occupation as reported by the California State Employment Development Department for the Salinas Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). A family of four employed in service occupations (e.g., retail sales, food preparation, personal care, building and ground maintenance) with only one source of income is considered to be a very low income family (Table App-7).1
Table App-5: Mean Annual Salary by Occupation, Salinas MSA Occupations Mean Annual Salary
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical $128,484
Management $120,548
Legal $118,113
Computer and Mathematical Operations $102,169
Architecture and Engineering $95,529
Life, Physical and Social Science $93,871
Education, Training, and Library $85,055
Business and Financial Operations $82,950
Protective Service $78,174
Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports $69,836
Community and Social Service Occupations $66,697
Construction and Extraction $65,222
Installation, Maintenance, and Repair $59,041
Average of All Occupations $58,629
Office and Administrative Support $50,171
Sales $46,280
Transportation and Material Moving $42,852
Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance $42,312
Personal Care and Service $41,395
Food Preparation and Serving $38,804
Retail Salespersons $37,843
Farming, Fishing, and Forestry $35,402
Cashier $34,332
Source: California Employment Development Department, 2022.

C. Household Type and Characteristics
In addition to population characteristics, household characteristics affect the type and quantity of housing needed in Seaside. For instance, different families (e.g., according to type, age, and size) require different types of housing to meet their needs, while a household’s income and assets determine the type of housing that can be afforded.

1. Household Income
Along with housing costs, household income is the most important variable that affects housing opportunity in a community. It determines a family’s ability to balance housing costs with other important living expenses. This section analyzes household income data from the 2000 and 2010 Census, 2010-2014 American Community Survey (ACS), and 2016-2020 ACS.

In 2014, the median income of Seaside households was $52,538 versus $58,582 for Monterey County as a whole. Seaside’s median income was the fourth highest among the County’s ten 1 The 2022 State Income Limits for a four-person household in Monterey County are: $34,100 (extremely low income), $56,850 (very low income), and $91,000 (low income).

Packet Page 217
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-7
cities in 2014. The period between 2000 and 2014 is unique in that median incomes increased in absolute value but in inflation-adjusted terms, median household incomes decreased throughout the entire County. Median income increased throughout the County between 2014 and 2020. The City’s median income rose by 18% to $68,399 in 2020. The highest percent increase between 2014 and 2020 occurred in Carmel-by-the-Sea, where median incomes increased by 48% (Table App-6).

Table App-6: Median Household Income
City
2000 Census 2014 ACS
2020
ACS
Percent
Change
2000-2014
Percent
Change
2014-2020
Unadjusted
2000
Inflation
Adjusted to
2020
Unadjusted
2014
Inflation
Adjusted to
2014
King City $34,398 $52,569 $40,500 $44,665 $50,174 -15.0% 12.3% Greenfield $37,602 $57,466 $52,374 $57,760 $64,879 0.5% 12.3% Seaside $41,393 $63,259 $52,538 $57,941 $68,399 -8.4% 18.0% Gonzales $42,602 $65,107 $51,178 $56,441 $69,136 -13.3% 22.5% Soledad $43,000 $65,715 $46,010 $50,741 $66,234 -22.8% 30.5% Marina $43,720 $66,816 $53,828 $59,363 $73,115 -11.2% 23.2% Salinas $43,720 $66,816 $49,728 $54,842 $67,914 -17.9% 23.8% Monterey $49,109 $75,052 $64,772 $71,433 $80,908 -4.8% 13.3% Pacific Grove $50,254 $76,801 $70,230 $77,452 $89,088 0.8% 15.0% Carmel-by-the-Sea $58,163 $88,888 $62,460 $68,883 $101,696 -22.5% 47.6% Monterey County $48,165 $73,609 $58,582 $64,606 $76,943 -12.2% 19.1% Source: Bureau of the Census, 2000; American Community Survey, 2010-2014 and 2016-2020.

Adjustment calculations made using the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI Inflation Calculator For the purposes of the Housing Element, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has established five income groups based on Area Median Income (AMI):2 • Extremely Low Income: up to 30% of AMI
• Very Low Income: 31%-50% of AMI
• Low Income: 51%-80% of AMI
• Moderate Income: 81%-120% AMI
• Above Moderate Income: >120% AMI
Pursuant to state and federal regulations, the AMI refers to the median income for the Metropolitan Statistical Area. For the City of Seaside, this area refers to Monterey County.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) periodically receives "custom tabulations" of Census data from the Census Bureau that are largely not available through standard Census products. The most recent estimates are derived from the 2015-2019 ACS. This dataset, known as the "CHAS" data (Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy), demonstrates the extent of housing problems and housing needs, particularly for lower income households. According to the CHAS data (Table App-7), extremely low and very low income households comprised close to 30% of all households in Seaside. About another 20% were within the low income (51% to 80% AMI) category and half of the City’s households (50%) were within the moderate/above moderate income category (greater than 80% AMI). The proportion of moderate/above moderate income households in the City was slightly smaller than the County as a whole.
2 State income definitions are different than federal income definitions. For federal housing programs, eligibility is established for households with incomes up to only 80% of the AMI. These households, under the federal definition, are considered moderate income. For housing plans that are required by federal regulations, such as the Consolidated Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, the federal income definitions are used.

Packet Page 218
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-8
Table App-7: Distribution by Income Group (2015-2019)
Jurisdiction Total Households
Extremely Low
Income
(0-30%)
Very Low
Income
(31-50%)
Low Income
(51-80%)
Moderate/Above
Moderate Income
(80%+)
City of Seaside 10,600 13.4% 16.4% 20.2% 50.0%
Monterey County 127,155 12.3% 13.7% 19.7% 54.4%
Note: Data presented in this table is based on special tabulations from sample Census data. The number of households in each category usually deviates slightly from the 100% count due to the need to extrapolate sample data out to total households. Interpretations of this data should focus on the proportion of households in need of assistance rather than on precise numbers. Furthermore, because HUD programs do not cover households with incomes above 80% of the County Area Median Income (AMI), CHAS data does not provide any breakdown of income groups above 80% AMI.

Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Data, 2015-2019.

2. Household Types
According to the 2010-2014 ACS, 10,185 households resided in Seaside, with an average household size of 3.2 persons. The number of households increased by 5% to 10,709 by 2020.

According to the 2016-2020 ACS, while married-couple families comprised the majority of households (47%), they are gradually declining in number and in proportion. The married-couple family category is divided into couples with children (20%) and those without children (27%).

Notably, married-couple households without children increased from 22% of households in 2014 to 27% in 2020 and now comprise the highest proportion of household types. Other families comprised 21% of all households in 2020, and included single-parent households with children and other related family members living together. Non-family households comprise the remainder of households (28%) (Table App-8).

As displayed in Table App-8, the City’s household composition has continued to shift. Between 2014 and 2020, the proportion of married couples with children continued to decline. while the proportion of non-family households increased steadily. The decrease in married couple family households is likely related to the closure of the military base, while the proportional increase in non-family households may be related to the opening and operation of the CSUMB campus, whose student population has grown from 654 students in 1995 to 7,409 students in 2020.

Despite the departure of many family households with children, the average household size in Seaside has increased to about 3.6 persons per household. This may indicate overcrowding or doubling up due to rising costs.

Table App-8: Changes in Household Type
Household Type
2010 Census 2014 ACS 2020 ACS Percent Change
# of
Households
% of
Total
# of
Households
% of
Total
# of
Households
% of
Total
2010-
2014
2014-
2020
All Households 10,093 100.0% 10,185 100.0% 10,709 100.00% 0.9% 5.1% Family Households
Married w/ Children 2,812 27.9% 2,813 27.6% 2,092 19.5% 0.0% -25.6% Married No Children 2,420 24.0% 2,224 21.8% 2,913 27.2% -8.1% 31.0% Other Families 2,141 21.2% 2,315 22.7% 2,219 20.7% 8.1% -4.1% Non-Families
Single 1,927 19.1% 2,129 20.9% 2,642 24.7% 10.5% 24.1%
Seniors Living Alone 697 6.9% 713 7.0% 939 8.8% 2.3% 31.7% Other Non-Families 793 7.8% 704 6.9% 843 7.9% -11.2% 19.7% Avg Household Size 3.2 3.2 3.6 - –
Source: Bureau of the Census, 2010; American Community Survey, 2010-2014 and 2016-2020 Estimates D. Housing Stock Characteristics
This section of the Housing Element addresses various housing characteristics and conditions that affect the wellbeing of Seaside residents. Factors evaluated in this section include the Packet Page 219
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-9
following: housing stock characteristics, tenure and vacancy rates, housing age and condition, housing costs, and affordability, among others.

1. Housing Stock
The number of housing units in Seaside has decreased very slightly (less than 1%) over the past 12 years. According to the Census Bureau and the California Department of Finance, Seaside’s units decreased from 10,872 units in 2010 to 10,818 units in 2022. Between 2016 and 2022, the number of multi-family units decreased minimally (by three units), while the number of singlefamily units decreased 1% (87 units). Despite an overall decline in multi-family units, the number of units in two- to four-unit structures increased by 1.4% (Table App-9).

In 2022, approximately 74% of the City’s housing stock comprised single-family units (detached and attached units), as shown in Table App-9. While about 13% of the City’s units were within complexes of five or more units. Additional housing units are available in mobile homes located in three mobile home parks in the City (included in “All Others” category in Table App-9).

Table App-9: Housing Units by Type
Unit Type
Number of Units Percent
Change
2010 to 2016
Percent
Change
2016-2022
% of All Units
(2022 DOF)
2010
Census
2016
DOF
2022
DOF
Single Family 8,044 8,080 7,993 0.4% -1.1% 73.9%
Detached 6,779 6,809 6,732 0.4% -1.1% 62.2%
Attached 1,265 1,271 1,261 0.5% -0.8% 11.7%
Multi-family 2,245 2,251 2,248 0.3% -0.1% 20.8%
2-4 Units 877 883 895 0.7% 1.4% 8.3%
5 or more 1,368 1,368 1,353 0.0% -1.1% 12.5%
All Others 583 583 577 0.0% -1.0% 5.3%
Total Units 10,872 10,914 10,818 0.4% -0.9% 100.0%
Sources: Bureau of the Census, 2010. 2016 and 2022 State Department of Finance (DOF), Housing and Population Estimates.

2. Unit Type and Size
Studio and one-bedroom units made up about 26% of the City’s rental market in 2020 and rental units are more likely to have fewer bedrooms than owner-occupied units. Approximately 46% of Seaside’s rental units are larger units (three or more bedrooms), while 79% of the City’s owner units have three or more bedrooms. This may indicate a need for larger housing units for renters to avoid overcrowding due to cost constraints and provide opportunities for households that prefer to reside with extended family.

Table App-10: Unit Size by Tenure (2016-2020) – City of Seaside Unit Size Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Total Occupied Housing Units Units Percent Units Percent Units Percent
Studio 32 0.8% 650 10.0% 682 6.4%
1 bedroom 50 1.2% 1,035 15.9% 1,085 10.1%
2 bedrooms 813 19.3% 1,786 27.5% 2,599 24.3%
3 bedrooms 2,847 67.7% 2,417 37.2% 5,264 49.2%
4 bedrooms 301 7.2% 544 8.4% 845 7.9%
5 or more bedrooms 163 3.9% 71 1.1% 234 2.2%
Total 4,206 100.0% 6,503 100.0% 10,709 100.0%
Source: American Community Survey, 2016-2020 Estimates.

Packet Page 220
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-10

3. Age of Housing Units
Maintaining the quality of housing in the community is an important goal for Seaside. Like any other asset, housing is subject to a gradual deterioration over time. If not repaired or maintained, housing deterioration can depress neighboring property values, discourage reinvestment, and eventually impact the quality of life of neighborhood residents.

Seaside is a mature community and the majority of its housing stock is more than 30 years old (Table App-11). According to the 2016-2020 ACS estimates, approximately 80% of units in the City were built before 1990, including 57% that were built before 1970.

Table App-11: Housing Age
Year Built Number Percent
Built 2010 or later 421 3.6%
2000 to 2009 931 8.0%
1990 to 1999 946 8.2%
1980 to 1989 951 8.2%
1970 to 1979 1,760 15.2%
1960 to 1969 2,244 19.4%
1950 to 1959 3,195 27.6%
1940 to 1949 882 7.6%
1939 or earlier 264 2.3%
Total 11,594 100.0%
Source: American Community Survey, 2016-2020 Estimates.

4. Housing Conditions
Housing is considered substandard when conditions are found to be below the minimum standard of living conditions defined in Section 1001 of the Uniform Housing Code. Households living in substandard conditions are considered to be in need of housing assistance, even if they are not seeking alternative housing arrangements, due to the threat to health and safety.

In addition to structural deficiencies and standards, the lack of infrastructure and utilities often serves as an indicator for substandard conditions. Typically, housing over 30 years of age is likely to have rehabilitation needs that may include new plumbing, roof repairs, and other repairs.

According to the 2016-2020 ACS, 53 occupied units in Seaside lacked complete kitchen facilities (Table App-12). Specifically, 37 of the units were owner-occupied and 16 of the units were renter occupied. About the same number of occupied units in the City lacked plumbing facilities. Based on the 2016-2020 ACS, owner occupied units are more likely to lack complete kitchen facilities, while renter occupied units are more likely to lack complete plumbing facilities. It should be noted that there may be some overlap in the number of substandard housing units, as some units may lack both complete plumbing and kitchen facilities. However, the Census typically undercounts substandard housing conditions, because it is not able to report on other more subtle housing problems, such as inadequate wiring, leaks, or inadequate or lack of heating.

Table App-12: Units Lacking Plumbing or Complete Kitchen Facilities (2020) Units Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Total
Lacking plumbing facilities 15 37 52
Lacking complete kitchen facilities 37 16 53
Source: American Community Survey, 2016-2020 Estimates.

5. Code Enforcement Activities
The City’s Code Enforcement Division estimates that 325 units in the City are in need or substantial rehabilitation and that five (5) units are in need of replacement. 3 The Code 3 Fort Ord is not included in the replacement estimate
Packet Page 221
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-11
Enforcement Division also provided estimates of the percentage of units requiring repair and the type of code violations seen in each neighborhood.

Table App-13: Summary of Neighborhood Conditions
Neighborhood Code Violations
Substantial
Repair Paint
Property
Maintenance
Cabrillo Accessory structures, junk, parking other than passenger vehicles <5% <5% 25% Terrace Junk, parking of other than passenger vehicles, accessory structures, parking violations
5% 10% 50%
Noche Buena Junk, parking of other than passenger vehicles, parking violations <5% 5% 25% Olympia 15%
Ord Grove Parking of other than passenger vehicles, junk <5% <5% Hannon 5%
Note: Shading indicates conditions not applicable in neighborhood.

Updated 12/13/2022.

6. Housing Tenure and Vacancy
Housing tenure and vacancy rates are important indicators of the supply and cost of housing.

Housing tenure refers to whether a unit is owned or rented. Vacancies are an important housing market indicator because the vacancy rate often influences the cost of housing and reflects the match between housing demand and availability.

Table App-14 illustrates tenure and vacancy rates from 2010 to 2020. In 2010, 41% of Seaside households owned the units they occupied, while 59% rented. By 2016, the homeownership rate decreased modestly to 38.1%, while the percentage of renter-households increased to 62%.

According to the 2016-2020 ACS, the City’s tenure breakdown shifted slightly toward the ownership market, with the homeownership rate increasing to 39%. Seaside’s homeownership rate was significantly lower than countywide average of 52%, according to the ACS.

A certain number of vacant units are needed to moderate the cost of housing, allow sufficient choice for residents, and provide an incentive for unit upkeep and repair. Specifically, vacancy rates of 5% to 6% for rental housing and 1.5% to 2% for ownership housing are considered necessary to balance the supply and demand for housing.

The overall vacancy rate in Seaside was 7.6% according to the 2016-2020 ACS. However, a significant portion (38%) of these vacant units were classified as “Other Vacant,” referring to units held vacant by owners for other unspecified reasons, including being held for occupancy by caretakers. This means that the actual vacancy rate in the City is considerably lower than the overall recorded vacancy rate. Units considered vacant due to seasonal uses represented 13% of all housing units in Seaside.

Table App-14 shows that the vacancy rate for rental housing units has been within the optimal level of 5% to 6% over the past 12 years. However, ownership rates have dipped significantly lower than optimal levels since 2010. According to the 2016-2020 ACS, the ownership vacancy rate was 0.3%.

Table App-14: Tenure and Vacancy Rates
2010 Census 2014 ACS 2020 ACS
Tenure
Owner 41.4% 38.1% 39.3%
Renter 58.6% 61.9% 60.7%
Vacancy
Owner 2.2% 0.4% 0.3%
Renter 4.9% 5.6% 5.5%
Sources: Bureau of the Census, 2010; American Community Survey, 2010-2014 and 2016-2020 Estimates.

Packet Page 222
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-12
Figure App-1: Renter-Occupied Housing
Packet Page 223
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-13
E. Housing Market
Information on current rental rates in Seaside was obtained through a review of advertisements on Craigslist, as well as rent data from the Housing Watch published by the Coalition of Homeless Service Providers. In addition, the CoreLogic real estate database was used to obtain sales data for homes and condominiums.

1. Home Prices
According to the CoreLogic real estate database, as summarized in Table App-15, home prices in Seaside increased significantly over the past six years. Seaside experienced one of the greatest increases in median home sales prices among the Peninsula cities, second only to Greenfield where median sales prices doubled. Other nearby cities, such as Marina and King City also experienced large increases in median sales prices during the same period, exceeding the countywide median. In the past, homes in Seaside were generally more affordable compared to other nearby cities and the County. However, as shown in Table App-15, median price in Seaside was increasing at only a slightly lower rate than the countywide median.

Table App-15: Median Home Price – November 2016 to August 2022 Jurisdiction
Median Price 2016-2022
November 2016 August 2022 % Change
Carmel $1,300,000 $2,050,000 57.7%
Gonzales $385,000 N/A N/A
Greenfield $262,500 $530,000 101.9%
King City $290,000 $512,750 76.8%
Marina $578,000 $960,000 66.1%
Monterey $662,000 $997,500 50.7%
Pacific Grove $808,500 $1,285,000 58.9%
Salinas $414,000 $661,500 59.8%
Seaside $437,500 $777,500 77.7%
Monterey County $500,000 $810,000 62.0%
Source: CoreLogic, California Home Sale Activity by City, Home sales Additional sources were consulted in an effort to better understand the home sale market in Seaside. Redfin.com listed 50 homes for sale on October 11, 2022 at a median listing home price of $742,000. According to Redfin’s most recent real estate data, the median sale price of homes in Seaside was $725,000 in August 2022, a decrease of 10.5% compared to the median sale price in August 2021. It appears prices are continuing to decline. Of note is that as of the writing of this Housing Element, the housing market is considered to be cooling down or rebalancing since its peak in May 2022.4 The downward trend in home prices began in July 2022 and was steepest in the Bay Area. Price drops are attributed to higher interest rates and the temporary boost in home prices that resulted from government economic actions to keep the economy afloat during the 2020 Recession.5
Unlike the CoreLogic real estate data, data obtained via newspaper and Internet listings provide information on the size of the units (based on the number of bedrooms). Table App-16 displays the housing data by type and number of bedrooms as provided by Realtor.com. A large portion of the units for sale consisted of three-bedroom homes with a median asking price of $735,000 and four-bedroom homes with a median asking price of $1.8 million. Most of the four-bedroom units were new construction/to be built units, while the other units were re-sale. Overall, median 4 https://journal.firsttuesday.us/home-prices-in-full-retreat-just-how-far-will-they-fall/86279/ 5 historically-low interest rates, induced by the Federal Reserve; individual stimulus payments; and federal eviction moratoriums and forbearance programs to keep people in their homes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Packet Page 224
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-14
asking price of all units was $749,500 in October 2022, consistent with the recent median sale price of $777,500 reported in August 2022 (Table App-15).

Table App-16: Home Listing Prices in Seaside (2022)
Number of Bedrooms
Number
of Units
Average
Asking Price
Median
Asking Price Range
Single-Family
1 Bedroom 2 $569,500 $569,500 $539,999-$599,000
2 Bedrooms 9 $714,550 $715,000 $585,000-$949,000
3 Bedrooms 19 $758,250 $735,000 $401,850-$995,500
4 Bedrooms 20 $1,584,714 $1,783,395 $789,000-$2,195,000 5 Bedrooms 2 $1,299,500 $1,299,500 $998,999-$1,600,000
Mobile Homes
2 Bedrooms 1 $160,000
3 Bedrooms 1 $254,000
Total 54 $962,448 $749,500
Source: Realtor.com, accessed October 14, 2022.

2. Rental Rates
The rental housing market in Seaside includes apartments, townhomes, condominiums, and single-family homes. During the month of October 2022, 22 units were listed as available for rent on Zillow.com. As shown in Table App-17, of the 21 advertised units, about 60% were apartments (up to two-bedroom units) and the remainder were single-family homes, townhomes, or condominiums.

Of the 13 apartment listings found during the Internet rent survey, the average monthly rent was $2,161 with a range of $1,450 to $4,000 per month. Rental homes tend to be larger and priced higher than apartments and most are not affordable to lower income families. The average price for a rental home in Seaside was $3,939. Most of the homes available for rent were threebedroom homes. Three-bedroom homes ranged from $3,200 to $3,800 per month with a median rent of $3,450.

Mobile home parks provide an affordable option for many very low income, low income, and senior households in Seaside. Three mobile home parks are located in Seaside: the Trailer Terrace Mobile Home Park; the Green Parrot Mobile Home Park; and the Seaside Mobile Home Estates.

Table App-17: Rental Rates (October 2022)
Apartment Rental Rates Studio 1 Bedroom 2 Bedrooms 3+ Bedrooms Number of Units Listed 2 8 3 0
Average Rent $1,518 $1,995 $3,032 --
Median Rent $1,518 $1,970 $2,900 --
Home Rental Rates 1 Bedroom 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4+ Bedrooms Number of Units Listed 0 1 6 2
Average Rent -- $3,150 $3,483 $5,700
Median Rent -- $3,150 $3,450 $5,700
Source: Zillow.com, Accessed October 14, 2022.

3. Housing Affordability
Housing affordability can be determined by comparing home sales prices and rents to household income. This information can help answer which households can afford to rent or own without overcrowding or overpayment problems. Table App-18 depicts the typical annual income for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households and calculates what each household can afford to pay for ownership and rental housing. It is generally accepted that households can spend up to 30% of their gross income toward housing expenses without Packet Page 225
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-15
overpayment. The table shows the highest monthly rent and the maximum purchase price for an individual or family at the top end of the income categories. The calculations are expanded to include five household sizes within each income category. For renters, housing cost is defined as rent and utilities. For purchasers, housing cost includes mortgage, utilities, property tax, insurance, and homeowner’s association fees as applicable.

Extremely Low Income Households
Extremely low income households have incomes that do not exceed 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI), as adjusted for household size. The maximum affordable home price for an extremely low income household is well below the median home price in Seaside. An extremely low income household can also only afford to pay $390 (one-person household) to $508 (fiveperson household) in rent. The data available on rental housing shows that there are no available units for rent within this range. Therefore, a one-person very low income household could not afford to rent a one-bedroom, and a small or large family (even at the top of the income range) could not afford an adequately sized apartment without some level of overpayment.

Very Low Income Households
Very low income households earning between 30% and 50% of the AMI have household incomes ranging from $39,800 to $61,400. The maximum affordable home purchase price for a very low income household is $95,337 for one-person households and $122,746 for five-person households, putting single-family and condominium homeownership out of reach. Mobile home ownership also is not a possibility, with the lowest priced mobile home in the City listed at $160,000. A very low income household can afford a monthly rent ranging from $787 to $1,222, depending on household size. Therefore, with rents in Seaside starting at $1,518 per month, very low income households cannot afford to rent in Seaside without subsidies.

Low Income Households
Low income households earn between $63,700 and $98,300 and can afford rents ranging from $1,385 to $2,045 per month. Low income households can afford smaller rental units but may find it difficult due to low availability and competition. Affordable home prices for a low income household range from $197,691 to $280,773; therefore, home prices in the City are well beyond what low income households can afford.

Moderate Income Households
Moderate income households earn more than the county median with annual incomes ranging from $75,650 to $116,750. They can afford rents ranging from $1,683 to $2,506 per month and homes priced from $248,868 and $359,787. Moderate income households cannot afford the median priced home in Seaside, but they may be able to afford some of the City’s mobile homes.

However, they cannot afford even one-bedroom single family homes in the market. Generally, these households will be able to comfortably afford market-rate rents in Seaside.

Based on the affordability information derived, housing affordability is a problem for nearly all lower income households and a significant proportion of moderate income households looking to purchase a home in Seaside.

Table App-18: Housing Affordability by Income Level
Size
Annual
Income
Affordable Monthly
Housing Cost Utilities
Taxes and
Insurance
Affordable Housing
Payment
Rent Purchase Rent Purchase Rent
Purchase
Price
Extremely Low Income Households (0-30% AMI)
1-Person $23,900 $598 $598 $208 $285 $494 $390 $27,244
2-Person $27,300 $683 $683 $223 $307 $546 $459 $36,007
3-Person $30,700 $768 $768 $274 $370 $639 $494 $33,964
Packet Page 226
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-16
Table App-18: Housing Affordability by Income Level
Size
Annual
Income
Affordable Monthly
Housing Cost Utilities
Taxes and
Insurance
Affordable Housing
Payment
Rent Purchase Rent Purchase Rent
Purchase
Price
4-Person $34,100 $853 $853 $341 $457 $756 $512 $25,509
5-Person $36,850 $921 $921 $413 $532 $854 $508 $17,608
Very Low Income Households (30-50% AMI)
1-Person $39,800 $995 $995 $208 $285 $633 $787 $95,337
2-Person $45,500 $1,138 $1,138 $223 $307 $705 $914 $113,950 3-Person $51,200 $1,280 $1,280 $274 $370 $818 $1,006 $121,757 4-Person $56,850 $1,421 $1,421 $341 $457 $955 $1,080 $122,938 5-Person $61,400 $1,535 $1,535 $413 $532 $1,069 $1,122 $122,746 Low Income Households (50-80% AMI)
1-Person $63,700 $1,593 $1,593 $208 $285 $842 $1,385 $197,691 2-Person $72,800 $1,820 $1,820 $223 $307 $944 $1,597 $230,864 3-Person $81,900 $2,048 $2,048 $274 $370 $1,087 $1,774 $253,233 4-Person $91,000 $2,275 $2,275 $341 $457 $1,254 $1,934 $269,188 5-Person $98,300 $2,458 $2,458 $413 $532 $1,392 $2,045 $280,773 Moderate Income Households (80 – 120% AMI)
1-Person $75,650 $1,891 $1,891 $208 $285 $662 $1,683 $248,868 2-Person $86,500 $2,163 $2,163 $223 $307 $757 $1,939 $289,536 3-Person $97,300 $2,433 $2,433 $274 $370 $851 $2,159 $319,184 4-Person $108,100 $2,703 $2,703 $341 $457 $946 $2,362 $342,420 5-Person $116,750 $2,919 $2,919 $413 $532 $1,022 $2,506 $359,787 Notes:

1. Assumptions: 2022 HCD income limits; Health and Safety code definitions of affordable housing costs (between 30% of household income depending on tenure and income level); Housing Auth of Monterey County Utility Allowance Schedule, 7-01-2021; 35% of monthly affordable cost for taxes and insurance; 10% down payment; and 3% interest rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage loan. Taxes and insurance apply to owner costs only; renters do not usually pay taxes or insurance.

2. Monterey County: 4-person household median income = $90,100

3. For extremely low income households (with four or more members), the utility assumptions/taxes/insurance represent a disproportionate rate of their household income, leaving limited incomes for housing costs. Therefore, their affordable home prices are lower for smaller households of the same income level.

Sources: State Department of Housing and Community Development 2022 Income Limits; Housing Authority of the County of Monterey Utility Allowances, 2021; Veronica Tam and Associates, 2022
Often, California housing prices mean that more than one wage earner is required to sustain housing. Based on median earnings from the State Department of Economic Development (Labor Statistics) and housing costs in Seaside, housing is not affordable to low-paying occupations such as retail sales and maintenance. According to the 2016-2020 ACS, 28% of families had two or more earners. Households with two or more wage-earners at the low-paying jobs would still not be able to afford the median rents or median priced homes in Seaside. These households are usually impacted by housing cost burden and are most vulnerable to sudden changes in economic conditions such as loss of employment. Table App-4 indicates that about 35% of the workers in Seaside are employed in the service sector. Based on current median rents and home prices, households would need to earn at least $129,000 to rent and $148,000 to own without incurring cost burdens.

Packet Page 227
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-17
Figure App-2: Income Needed to Rent or Own Compared to Earnings by Occupation Sources: State Employment Development Department, 2022.

Affordable housing cost calculations by Veronica Tam and Associates, Inc.

F. Housing Issues
A continuing priority of Seaside is enhancing or maintaining the quality of life in the community.

A key measure of quality of life in a community is the extent of “housing issues” faced by residents. These include housing overcrowding (defined as more than one person per habitable room) and overpayment (defined as paying more than 30% of income toward housing costs). This section describes the nature and extent of housing problems in Seaside.

1. Overcrowding
Overcrowding is an indicator of housing affordability. Unit overcrowding is often caused by the combined effect of lower incomes and high housing costs in a community and reflects the $147,911
$147,911
$129,600
$113,244
$128,484
$120,548
$118,113
$102,169
$95,529
$93,871
$85,055
$82,950
$78,174
$69,836
$66,697
$65,222
$59,041
$58,629
$50,171
$46,280
$42,852
$42,312
$41,395
$38,804
$37,843
$35,402
$34,332
$- $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 Income Needed: Own (Median-Priced Home)
Income Needed: Own (New Construction)
Income Needed: Rent (Median Rent)
County Mean Income
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical
Management
Legal
Computer and Mathematical Operations
Architecture and Engineering
Life, Physical and Social Science
Education, Training, and Library
Business and Financial Operations
Protective Service
Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports
Community and Social Service Occupations
Construction and Extraction
Installation, Maintenance, and Repair
Average of All Occupations
Office and Administrative Support
Sales
Transportation and Material Moving
Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance
Personal Care and Service
Food Preparation and Serving
Retail Salespersons
Farming, Fishing, and Forestry
Cashier
Income Needed for Median Priced Home/Rent vs. Mean Salary by Occupation Packet Page 228
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-18
inability of households to buy or rent housing that provides reasonable privacy for their residents. An overcrowded household is defined as one with more than one person per habitable room, excluding bathrooms, kitchens, hallways, and porches. A severely overcrowded household is defined as one with more than 1.5 persons per habitable room.

According to the 2016-2020 ACS, 12% of Seaside households lived in overcrowded conditions.

Renter-households made up a larger proportion of overcrowded households than owners (Table App-19). About 17% of renter-households in Seaside were overcrowded compared to about 5% of owner households. Renter households were also more susceptible to severe overcrowding.

Table App-19: Overcrowded Housing
Household Income
Renters Owners Total Households
# % # % # %
Overcrowded Households
(1.01-1.5 persons per room)
563 8.7% 197 4.7% 760 7.1%
Severely Overcrowded
(1.5+ persons per room)
529 8.1% 25 0.6% 554 5.2%
All Overcrowded Households 1,092 16.8% 222 5.3% 1,314 12.3% All Households 6,503 100.0% 4,206 100.0% 10,709 100.0%
Source: American Community Survey, 2016-2020 Estimates.

A similar proportion of Monterey County residents (14%) live in overcrowded conditions; and, like Seaside, renters in Monterey County were more affected by overcrowding than homeowners.

Figure App-3: Overcrowded Housing by Tenure
Source: American Community Survey, 2016-2020.

2. Cost Burden
Housing cost burden is generally defined as paying more than 30% of income toward housing expenses. Cost burden is disproportionately concentrated among the most vulnerable members of Seaside. Table App-20 shows that housing cost burden was more likely to affect renterhouseholds than owner-households in Seaside, particularly among those households within the lowest income levels. According to CHAS 2019 data, approximately 3,960 lower income households (extremely low, very low, and low income) experience cost burdens. This may largely be due to the fact that households at these income levels rarely own their homes or have owned their homes for a long time and generally have lower housing payments, resulting in lower owner

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%
Renter-Households Owner-Households
Seaside Monterey County
Packet Page 229
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-19
cost burden rates. In contrast, the extent of cost burden was similar amongst moderate income homeowners and renters.

Table App-20: Housing Overpayment
Renters Owners All Households
# % # % # %
Total Households 3,990 63.1% 1,210 28.3% 5,200 49.0%
By Income Level
Extremely Low Income 950 86.0% 185 57.8% 1,135 79.6%
Very Low Income 1,225 98.0% 225 46.4% 1,450 83.6%
Low Income 1,020 73.1% 355 47.7% 1,375 64.3%
Moderate/AM Income 795 30.9% 445 16.3% 1,240 23.4%
AMI = Area Median Income
Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Data, 2015-2019.

Figure App-4 compares housing cost burden in Seaside to Monterey County as a whole. Overall, Seaside households (49%) are slightly more affected by housing cost burden than County households (40%).

Figure App-4: Housing Cost Burden by Income Level and Tenure Source: HUD Comprehensive Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Data, 2015-2019 G. Special Needs Groups
Certain groups in Seaside have greater difficulty finding decent, affordable housing due to special circumstances. Special circumstances may be related to one’s age, family characteristics, disability, or employment, among others. Thus, certain segments of Seaside’s population may experience a higher prevalence of overpayment, overcrowding, or other housing problem.

State Housing Element law defines the following groups as having special housing needs: senior households, persons with disabilities, large households, female-headed households, homeless people, and farmworkers. Local jurisdictions may also identify additional special needs groups based on local conditions. In recognition that people in different walks of life have different housing needs, state and federal housing laws are designed to encourage the provision of a full continuum of housing so that no group is excluded from living in Seaside.

Table App-21 summarizes the various types of special needs groups residing in the City. Where available, data from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey is used. However, in other

79.6%

83.6%

64.3%

23.4%

49.0%

81.5%

74.9%

52.2%

18.0%

40.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%
Extremely Low Income Very Low Income Low Income Moderate/Above Mod Income
All Households
Seaside Monterey County
Packet Page 230
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-20
cases, estimates were derived from other governmental agencies or reliable survey sources. This section also contains a detailed discussion of the housing needs facing each particular group as well as City programs and services available to address their housing needs.

Table App-21: Special Needs Groups
Special Needs Group
# of Persons/
Households
# of
Owners3
# of
Renters3
% of Total Persons/
Households4
Households w/ Members Age 65+ 3,024 -- -- 28.2%
Senior Headed Households 2,461 1,559 (14.6%) 902 (8.5%) 23.0% Senior Living Alone 939 454 (4.2%) 485 (4.5%) 8.8%
Disabled Persons 3,646 -- -- 10.7%
Large Households (5+) 1,571 500 (4.7%) 1,071 (10.0%) 14.7% Female-Headed Households 2,544 -- -- 23.8%
Female-Headed households with Children1 341 -- -- 3.2%
Farmworkers 135 -- -- 0.4%
Extremely-Low Income Households 1,060 280 (26.4%) 780 (73.6%) 10.5% Residents Living Below Poverty 3,996 -- -- 11.7%
Homeless 152 -- -- 0.5%5
Military Personnel 699 -- -- 2.1%
Students2 3,754 -- -- 11.0%
Notes:

1. No spouse present

2. Total enrolled, Undergraduate and Graduate Level

3. Percentages in these columns represent percentage from total households

4. Total households= 10,709 in 2016-2020 ACS; Population=34,063 in 2016-2020 ACS

5. Percentage of 2022 population according to Dept. of Finance Estimates.

Sources: American Community Survey, 2016-2020 Estimates; 2022 Monterey County Homeless Point-in-Time Census and Survey; 2022 California Department of Finance Population Estimates.

1. Seniors
Despite their high levels of homeownership, seniors are considered a special needs group. Most seniors have limited incomes, high health care costs, and disabilities; finding and maintaining suitable and affordable housing may be difficult. A significant portion of seniors also have a selfcare or mobility limitation, defined as a condition lasting over six months that makes it difficult to go outside the home alone or take care of one’s personal needs.

Because of the limited supply of affordable housing, senior households have housing cost burden. The extent of cost burden typically varies according to tenure with senior renters often being more susceptible than senior homeowners. According to the 2016-2020 ACS, the City of Seaside was home to 2,960 seniors (persons older than 65 years) and 3,024 households in the City had at least one senior member. Furthermore, 2,461 households were headed by seniors, representing 23% of all households in Seaside. The majority of the City’s senior-headed households owned their homes.

Various programs can assist seniors with their housing needs, including: congregate care, shared housing, rental subsidies, and housing rehabilitation assistance. For frail seniors, or those with disabilities, housing with architectural features that accommodate disabilities can help ensure continued independent living. Seniors with disabilities also benefit from transportation alternatives or assisted housing with supportive services.

Resources
Regarding housing services for seniors, one housing development in Seaside – Villa del Monte – has 80 rental units that are restricted for seniors (Table App-29). In addition to this senior housing development, seniors in the City are also served by four licensed care facilities (Table App-22).

Packet Page 231
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-21
Table App-22: Licensed Community Care Facilities
Type of Facility Facilities
Capacity
(beds/persons)
Adult Residential Care Facility 1 22
Residential Care for the Elderly 3 61
Total 4 83
Source: California Department of Social Services (CDSS), October 2022.

Senior Programs offered through Seaside’s Recreation Services Department (located at the Oldemeyer Center) provide a variety of recreational activities for seniors of Seaside and surrounding communities. These include excursions, leisure activities, support services and a nutrition program.

Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST) has established a Taxi Voucher Program that provides taxi vouchers to qualifying seniors (65 years or older and residents of participating Cities). An elderly resident may obtain up to 10 vouchers per calendar month; one voucher is good for a single oneway trip up to the value of $17.00 (a rider is responsible for anything over the $17.00 metered amount and a $3.00 copayment). Taxi sharing is encouraged, with only one taxi voucher required for a shared ride. The taxi voucher trip must originate and terminate within only one of these two areas: Area 1: Anywhere within the city limits of Salinas; Area 2: Anywhere within the city limits of Carmel, Del Rey Oaks, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Sand City, or Seaside. For more information: https://mst.org/mobility/vouchers/.

2. Persons with Disabilities
The Americans with Disabilities Act defines a disability as a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. Persons with disabilities have special needs because many earn very low incomes, have higher health care costs, and are often dependent on supportive services. Federal laws define a person with a disability as “any person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; has a record of such impairment; or is regarded as having such impairment.” In general, a physical or mental impairment includes hearing, mobility and visual impairments, chronic alcoholism, chronic mental illness, AIDS, AIDS Related Complex, and intellectual impairments that substantially limits one or more major life activities. Major life activities include walking, talking, hearing, seeing, breathing, learning, performing manual tasks, and caring for oneself.6 The U.S. Census Bureau classifies disabilities into the following categories:
• Hearing difficulty: Deaf or having serious difficulty hearing • Vision difficulty: Blind or having serious difficulty seeing, even when wearing glasses • Cognitive difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty remembering, concentrating, or making decisions
• Ambulatory difficulty: Having serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs • Self-care difficulty: Having difficulty bathing or dressing • Independent living difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping According to the 2016-2020 ACS, the City had an estimated 3,646 persons living with a range of disabilities. Table App-23 shows the types of disabilities affecting Seaside residents. According to the ACS, ambulatory and cognitive disabilities were the most common among all age groups, though the City’s elderly population was the most affected by disabilities. 6 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. “Disability Overview.” https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/disability_overview. Accessed December 12, 2022.

Packet Page 232
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-22
Table App-23: Disabilities
Type of Disability Age 5-15 Age 16-64 Age 65+
Total
Disabilities
% of Total
Disabilities
With a hearing difficulty 0 192 914 1106 30.3%
With a vision difficulty 119 388 116 623 17.1%
With a cognitive difficulty 112 853 557 1,522 41.7%
With an ambulatory difficulty 12 730 1,204 1,946 53.4%
With a self-care difficulty 32 253 613 898 24.6%
With an independent living difficulty - 564 727 1,291 35.4% Total 231 1,660 1,755 3,646 100.0%
“-“ indicates that the category did not exist in the Census.

Note: A person can have multiple disabilities and therefore the number of disabilities tallied exceeds the number of persons with disabilities.

Source: American Community Survey, 2016-2020 Estimates.

The type and severity of one’s disability often determines the type of living arrangement that best accommodates the needs of the individual. Many persons with disabilities live at home independently or with family members. To maintain independent living, some may need housing assistance or supportive services. Services can include modifying housing design features, providing income support for those not able to work, and in-home services for persons with medical conditions. Services can be provided by public or private agencies.

Persons with Developmental Disabilities
As defined by state law, “developmental disability” means a severe, chronic disability of an individual who:
• Is attributable to a mental or physical impairment or combination of mental and physical impairments;
• Is manifested before the individual attains age 187;
• Is likely to continue indefinitely;
• Results in substantial functional limitations in three or more of the following areas of major
• life activity: a) self-care; b) receptive and expressive language; c) learning; d) mobility; e) self-direction; f) capacity for independent living; or g) economic self- sufficiency; and • Reflects the individual’s need for a combination and sequence of special, interdisciplinary, or generic services, individualized supports, or other forms of assistance that are of lifelong or extended duration and are individually planned and coordinated.

The Census does not record developmental disabilities. According to the U.S. Administration on Developmental Disabilities, an accepted estimate of the percentage of the population that can be defined as developmentally disabled is 1.5%. This equates to about 481 persons in the City of Seaside based on the 2022 California Department of Finance Population Estimates. According to data provided by the State Department of Developmental Services, 171 Seaside residents were served by the San Andreas Regional Center that serves the counties of Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz as of January 2022. Among the 171 residents, 92 were under 18 years of age. In terms of living arrangements, most (154 persons) were living with parents or guardians, 12 were living independently, and the remaining 3 were in foster homes or other living arrangements. The adult residents with developmental disabilities but living with family or guardians may require independent living in the future.

Resources
Special housing needs for persons with disabilities fall into two general categories: physical design to address mobility impairments and in-home social, educational, and medical support to 7 The State of California defines developmental disabilities slightly differently than federal law. The main difference is at the manifestation age, where federal definition established that threshold at age 22.

Packet Page 233
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-23
address developmental and mental impairments. The California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division reports that in Seaside there are four state-licensed care facilities: three residential care facilities for the elderly, and one adult residential facility.

The San Andreas Regional Center (SARC) is a community-based, private nonprofit corporation funded by the State of California to serve people with developmental disabilities as required by the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (aka Lanterman Act). The Lanterman Act is part of California law that sets out the rights and responsibilities of persons with developmental disabilities. SARC is one of 21 regional centers throughout California and serves individuals and their families who reside within Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz Counties. The Regional Center provides diagnosis and assessment of eligibility and helps plan, access, coordinate, and monitor the services, and supports that are needed because of a developmental disability.

3. Large Households
Large households are defined as those with five or more members. Large households are considered a special needs group in most communities because of a lack of affordable housing that can adequately accommodate large families. For lower income large families, the housing shortage can be particularly acute and result in a greater prevalence and severity of overcrowding and overpayment.

According to the 2016-2020 ACS, large households comprised about 15% of all Seaside households (see Table App-24). Of these large households, 68% were renters and 32% owned their homes. A total of 6,343 housing units with three or more bedrooms (generally accepted as the minimum number of bedrooms needed for large households to avoid overcrowded living conditions) were located in Seaside (Table App-10) — more than two times the number of large households living in the City. While the data suggests that the City has an adequate supply of larger housing units to accommodate needs, the affordability of these units is unknown. Given the level of overcrowding in the City, a mismatch between housing needs and affordability still exists.

Table App-24: Large Households by Tenure (2016-2020)
Number of Persons in Unit Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Total Five 289 495 784
Six 68 231 299
Seven or more 143 345 488
Total Large Households 500 1,071 1,571
Total Households 4,206 6,503 10,709
Percent of Total Households 11.9% 16.5% 14.7%
Source: American Community Survey, 2016-2020.

Resources
Large households in Seaside can benefit from general programs and services for lower and moderate income households, including the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey Housing Choice Voucher program, and various community and social services provided by nonprofit organizations in the region.

4. Single-Parent Female-Headed Families
Single-parent families often require special consideration or assistance as a result of their generally lower household incomes, high costs of childcare, and increased need for supportive services and affordable housing. As a result, many single-parent families are faced with limited housing choices. Single-parent households accounted for 4% of Seaside households in 2022. The majority of these households were female-headed.

Female-headed single-parent families often face a number of additional obstacles. According to the 2016-2020 ACS, 29% of all female-headed single-parent households were living in poverty.

Packet Page 234
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-24
Single-parent families must also allocate a portion of their incomes towards childcare costs as reliable child care is often necessary in order to retain stable employment. Compounded with housing costs, child care costs reduce the ability of these households to pay for other necessities, such as food and medical care.

Table App-25: Households by Type
Household Type Number Percent
Married Couple Households 5,005 46.7%
With Children 2,092 19.5%
With No Children 2,913 27.2%
Cohabitating Couple Household 1,101 10.3%
With Children 486 4.5%
With No Children 615 5.7%
Female Householder* 1,361 12.7%
With Children 341 3.2%
With No Children 1,020 9.5%
Male Householder* 858 8.0%
With Children 118 1.1%
With No Children 740 6.9%
Non-Family Households 3,485 32.5%
Total Households 10,709 100.0%
Source: American Community Survey, 2016-2020.
*Family Household, No spouse present
Resources
Limited household income constrains the ability of single-parent households to afford adequate housing, childcare, health care, and other necessities. The City of Seaside offers various programs for families with children. The City of Seaside’s Youth Programs include the Tiny Tot University Preschool Programs, K-5th Grade Programs/Camps, Teen Programs, Sports Programs, and variety of classes and activities. The K-5th Grade Programs offered in Seaside include a daily afterschool program (including homework assistance and recreational activities), and a number of seasonal camps that include Full-Day, Sports, and Cheer Camp options.

The City of Seaside’s B.J. Dolan Youth & Education Teen Center at 1136 Wheeler Street offers a variety of recreational opportunities for teens including cultural events, dances, movie nights, field trips, and volunteer opportunities through its Volunteer Team in Practice (VIP) program as well a Youth Employment Program.

Single-parent households in Seaside can also benefit from general programs and services for lower and moderate-income households, including the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM) Housing Choice Voucher program, and various community and social services provided by nonprofit organizations in the region.

5. Homelessness
The member agencies of the Monterey County Coalition of Homeless Service Providers (CHSP) have worked together to conduct the 2022 Monterey County Point-in-Time Homeless Census and Survey. HUD’s definition of homelessness for Point-in-Time counts was used. The definition includes any individual or family:

Packet Page 235
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-25
• Living in a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter designated to provide temporary living arrangements; or
• With a primary nighttime residence that is a public or private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings, including a car, park, abandoned building, bus or train station, airport, or camping ground.

The 2022 Monterey County Point-in-Time Count was a communitywide effort conducted on January 27-28, 2022. The 2022 Monterey County Point-in-Time Homeless Census represents a complete enumeration of all sheltered and unsheltered persons experiencing homelessness at a specified date and time. It consisted of two primary components:
• General Street Count: An early morning count of unsheltered homeless individuals and families on January 27 and 28, 2022. Two days were needed due to the utilization of program-based outreach staff who were the primary enumerators used in lieu of lived experience guides who served as outreach experts in previous efforts. These outreach teams focused on those sleeping outdoors on the street; at bus and train stations; in parks, tents, and makeshift shelters; and in vehicles and abandoned properties. • General Shelter Count: A nighttime count of homeless individuals and families staying at publicly and privately-operated shelters on January 27, 2022. This included those who occupied emergency shelters, transitional housing, and safe havens.

The Point-in-Time Census also included the following important supplemental components:
• Targeted Street Count of Unaccompanied Children and Young Adults: An afternoon count of unsheltered unaccompanied children under 18 and unaccompanied youth 18-24 years old on January 27, 2022. This is considered a best practice to better profile this age group who are more challenging to enumerate in the traditional PIT count process. • County Office of Education Student Information System (SIS) Unsheltered Homeless Report for K-12 Students: SIS is a database managed by every school district in Monterey County. One of the measures recorded in this database is homelessness status. • Homeless Survey: In the weeks following the street count, a survey was administered to 287 unsheltered and sheltered individuals experiencing homelessness to profile their experience and characteristics.

The 2022 Monterey County Homeless Census and Survey resulted in a total count of 2,047 persons: 1,357 unsheltered homeless people on streets countywide (66%) and 690 sheltered homeless people in emergency shelters, transitional housing and domestic violence shelters (34%). About 7% (or 152 persons) of these homeless persons were found in the City of Seaside — a 16% decrease from the survey conducted in 2019. Approximately 41% of Seaside’s homeless population (62%) was unsheltered.

The data results also included a demographic survey of 287 individuals. Of the 287 respondents, 3% were under the age of 25. About 36% were between the ages of 25 and 40 and 61% were 41 years or older, reflecting an aging trend since 2015, which has been notable throughout Monterey County in recent years. When asked if they identified as Hispanic or Latinx, half (50%) of homeless survey respondents indicated they did in 2022, a smaller percentage compared to the general population of Monterey County (59%) but an increase from 39% from 2019 survey respondents. In regard to race, 59% identified as White, 13% Black or African-American, 7% American Indian or Hawaiian Native, 4% Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and 3% Asian. The majority of survey respondents (55%) identified as male, 43% female, and 2% as gender non-conforming, questioning, or a gender not singularly female or male.

Of those surveyed in 2022, over one-third (38%) reported that the current episode of homelessness was their first-time experiencing homelessness, representing a decrease from 2019 but similar to 2015 and 2017. When asked about the duration of their current episode of homelessness, the vast majority (85%) of survey respondents reported they had been homeless for a year or longer, representing a substantial increase from 63% in 2019. Three percent had been homeless for less than 1 month, same as in 2019 (3%). Another 2% of respondents had been Packet Page 236
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-26
homeless 7 days or less (also same as 2019). Approximately 87% of respondents were unemployed at the time of the survey.

Table App-26: Homeless Population, Monterey County
Jurisdiction
Unsheltered* Sheltered Total % of Total % Change
2019 2022 2019 2022 2019 2022 2019 2022 2019-2020
Carmel 6 1 0 0 6 1 0.2% 0.0% -83.3%
Del Rey Oaks 0 2 0 0 - 2 0.0% 0.1% --
Greenfield 14 2 0 0 14 2 0.6% 0.1% -85.7%
King City 27 18 0 0 27 18 1.1% 0.9% -33.3%
Marina 98 81 261 275 359 356 14.8% 17.4% -0.8%
Monterey 167 74 37 27 204 101 8.4% 4.9% -50.5%
Pacific Grove 14 29 0 0 14 29 0.6% 1.4% 107.1%
Salinas 876 777 206 288 1,082 1,065 44.7% 52.0% -1.6%
Sand City 8 3 0 0 8 3 0.3% 0.1% -62.5%
Seaside 126 90 56 62 182 152 7.5% 7.4% -16.5%
Soledad 35 12 0 0 35 12 1.4% 0.6% -65.7%
Unincorporated 338 268 32 38 370 306 15.3% 14.9% -17.3% Monterey County 1,830 1,357 592 690 2,422 2,047 100.0% 100.0% -15.5% Source: 2022 Monterey County Point-In-Time Homeless Census and Survey. *The unsheltered population includes homeless people counted on the streets, in vehicles, in makeshift shelters (such as tents) and encampments.

Understanding the types of places where individuals experiencing homelessness are sleeping can help inform local outreach efforts. When questioned about usual sleeping arrangements, 62% of survey respondents reported currently living outdoors, either on the streets, in parks, or in encampment areas, a substantial increase compared to 40% in 2019. Only 5^ reported staying in a public shelter (emergency shelter, transitional housing facility or alternative shelter environment), a significant decrease from the 24% in 2019. Seventeen percent of survey respondents reported that they lived in vehicles (camper, car, van or RV). Seven percent of respondents reported they were sleeping in structures and indoor areas (such as foyers, hallways or other indoor areas) not meant for human habitation.

The primary cause of a person’s inability to obtain or retain housing can be difficult to pinpoint, as it is often the result of multiple compounding causes. An inability to secure adequate housing can also lead to an inability to address or obtain other basic needs, such as healthcare and adequate nutrition. Fifty percent of survey respondents self-reported financial issues (such as job loss and eviction) as the primary cause of their homelessness, a significant increase in economic related causes from previous years. Over a third (34%) cited alcohol or drug use, 29% cited incarceration, and 23% cited mental health issues. Additionally, 13% of respondents indicated that the primary cause of homelessness was related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Many individuals experiencing homelessness face significant barriers to obtaining permanent housing. These barriers can range from housing affordability and availability to accessing the economic and social supports (e.g., increased income, rental assistance, and case management).

When asked what prevented them from obtaining housing, the most common response was “can’t afford rent,” reported by 71% of survey respondents, suggesting housing affordability and poverty issues as key obstacles. This was followed by 56% who reported a lack of job or not enough income, and 35% who said they had no money for moving costs. Survey respondents were asked if they have received a housing voucher of any kind in the last 12 months, 10% of all respondents revealed they had, although only 21% of those respondents reported that they were able to successfully use the housing voucher.

Packet Page 237
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-27
Resources
Generally, three types of facilities provide shelter for homeless individuals and families:
emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent supportive housing. In Seaside, two types of these facilities are available (described below). Services available in Seaside are presented in Table App-27.
• Emergency Shelter: Provides overnight shelter and fulfills a client’s basic needs (i.e., food, clothing, and medical care) either on-site or through off-site services. • Transitional Housing: a residence that provides housing for up to 2 years. Residents of transitional housing are usually connected to rehabilitative services.

Table App-27: Homeless Service Providers in Seaside
Shelters and Clients
Population
Served Beds and/or Services
Day/Resource Centers
Monterey Peninsula Unified School
District – Family Resource
Center
Families and
children
Provides support for homeless children and families within the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District including clothing, school supplies, and referral to other community resources to remove barriers to education.

Emergency Shelter
Community Homeless SolutionsCentral Coast Respite CenterFormerly hospitalized adults
A 6-bed shelter for homeless adults in need of respite care following stays in 3 participating hospitals. Access to meals, case management, and supportive services designed to help participants transition to permanent housing. By hospital referral only. The program also maintains a bridge housing program for guests coming out of respite care while lining up permanent housing options.

Community Human Services –
Casa de Noche Buena
Women and
families
A 20-35 bed year-round shelter. Capacity depends on the number of children in families. Provides case management, housing navigation, meals, laundry facilities, mail service, social recreation activities, and linkages to income, education, and employment
Safe Parking Program Anyone in need An overnight safe parking program for people living in their legally registered vehicles. The program opens at 7:00 p.m. nightly and closes each morning at 7:00 a.m.

Salvation Army – Frederiksen
House
Families; women
with children
Shelter available for up to 90 days in the program facility. The Salvation Army also provides case management, information & referral services.

Transitional Housing
Salvation Army – Casa de Las
Palmas
Families with
children
Family transitional housing provides residential care for a period not to exceed 24 months Must be clean and sober.
9 units, 36 beds
Rental Support Services
Catholic Charities Anyone in need Family supportive services program provides eviction prevention assistance, financial education, nutrition education, as well as assistance with Covered California and CalFresh application process.

Rental assistance
Available November – March.

Monterey County Department of
Social Services - Community
Benefits Branch
Monterey
residents
Provides temporary public assistance benefits and services to assist eligible residents of Monterey County to meet basic needs. Programs include Temporary Cash Assistance for Needy Families (cash aid), General Assistance, Medi-Cal, CalFresh, and CalWORKs. Eligibility for these public benefits is based upon income and resource levels.

Health and Wellness
Sun Street Centers - Outpatient
Counseling
Men, women, and
teens
Provides counseling services for men, women, teens. Group and individual sessions are provided for people struggling with alcohol or drug abuse. Bi-lingual services are available. Counseling for couples and families is also available.

Packet Page 238
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-28
Table App-27: Homeless Service Providers in Seaside
Shelters and Clients
Population
Served Beds and/or Services
Community Human Services -
Genesis House
Men, women, and
perinatal women
A 36-bed state-licensed residential drug treatment program for men, women, and perinatal women seeking recovery from substance abuse.

Children ages 0-5 may live with their mothers in treatment. Medi-Cal accepted.

Source: Monterey County Homeless Services Resource Guide, January 2023.

For more details see:
https://www.salinascityesd.org/cms/lib/CA50010838/Centricity/Domain/149/Homeless%20Services%20Resource%20Guide%20ENG%202023.pdf Housing navigation services are available to individuals experiencing housing instability or homelessness, often in conjunction with case management. Organizations offering housing navigation include:
• Community Health Engagement (831)770-1700
• Housing Resource Center (831) 424-9186
• Central Coast Center for Independent Living (831) 757-2968 The Housing Authority of Monterey County (HACM) also has an HCV program specifically for homeless/housing unstable residents called the Emergency Housing Voucher (EHV). HACM has dedicated Housing Navigator staff.

6. Farmworkers
Farmworkers are a special needs group due to the lower wages associated with their occupations. Many farmworkers also face language barriers and have difficulty finding affordable housing. There is little consensus among the available data on the number of farmworkers working or living in Monterey County. Data collected from the Census has found that Seaside’s small population of farmworkers has steadily declined over time. The 1990 Census reported that 594 residents of Seaside were employed in farming, fishing, and forestry occupations. By 2000, the number of residents employed in these occupations declined 46% to only 320. According to the 2016-2020 ACS survey, only 135 residents were employed in farming, fishing, and forestry occupations. Based on the proximity of Seaside to commercial fishing companies operating in the Monterey Bay, a safe assumption is that a significant proportion of the City’s farmworkers are fishermen.

The most recent USDA Agricultural Census (2017) estimates that there were 26,929 workers (hired labor) and 1,028 unpaid workers in Monterey County. Of the 26,929 hired laborers, more than half (14,806 workers, 55%) were employed for 150 days or more while the other 45% (12,123) workers were hired for fewer than 150 days and are likely seasonal workers. The USDA Census does not provide data at a City level.

Resources
Due to the limited number of farmworkers in Seaside and the likelihood that most of the agricultural population is employed in the fishing industry, the City’s affordable housing programs generally address the needs of farm laborers in Seaside.

7. Military Personnel
Lower incomes and an uncertain length of residency affect the housing needs of military personnel. The City of Seaside was home to the former U.S. Army base Fort Ord, which was deactivated in 1993. In 1990, there were 8,655 people employed in the Armed Forces in Seaside.

With the base closure, this figure dropped to 1,446 military personnel in 2000, roughly 6% of the population over 16 years of age. This number dropped even further - to 2.1% (699 military personnel) - by the 2016-2020 ACS.

Packet Page 239
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-29
Resources
The Army contracted with a private development team to replace and/or renovate all of the housing units reserved for military personnel at Ford Ord. This was part of the Army’s Residential Communities Initiative (RCI) program and the overall plan was to demolish the original 1,588 military housing units within Seaside city limits and replace them with 1,384 new homes. Thus far, this has resulted in approximately 300 replacement military residential units.8

8. College Students
When Congress decided on the closure of Fort Ord, the local community proposed the base be converted into a university. In June 1994, a plan was approved ultimately leading to the establishment of California State University Monterey Bay (CSUMB), parts of which are located within north Seaside.

The region’s college student population is another significant factor affecting housing demand.

Full time equivalent enrollment (FTE) at CSUMB reached 6,373 in the Fall 2022 term.9 According to CSUMB, as of 2022, 46% lived in campus apartments or residence halls, and approximately 54% were living off campus, in Seaside and other nearby communities. A large presence of college students puts pressure on the local rental housing market due to their transient housing needs.

Over 1,300 acres of land and a large existing inventory of buildings, many of them residential, have allowed CSUMB to adopt a strong residential campus policy. The campus currently has the capacity to accommodate 3,980 beds for students on the Main and East Campuses and 754 units for faculty and staff in a variety of single-family, multi-family, and dormitory-type units. The campus currently offers co-ed dorms, apartments for single and married students, and suites, as well as special needs housing for disabled students and international students.

In 2016, CSUMB initiated a process to update the 2007 campus master plan. The new 2016 CSUMB Campus Master Plan envisions the future of the university campus as it grows over the next 15 years. To accommodate an expanding California population, CSUMB is planning to move forward with an established growth target of 12,700 FTE students, nearly doubling the size of their current community. This growth not only means an increase in students, but the facilities that support them, including academic buildings, residence halls, recreation facilities, student services, and faculty offices. The Master Plan outlines the space and facility needs for the university’s functions – including the needs to support planned growth to 12,700 FTE, with housing for 60% of students (a total of 7,260 beds) and 65% of faculty and staff (a total of 970 units). New residential units are planned to help meet the new capacity needs.10 In 2017 the campus posted a Draft Campus Master Plan and accepted public comment. The most current plan is the Draft Master Plan Guidelines 2022 document, which includes minor edits to the 2017 Master Plan.

Resources
CSUMB offers a variety of housing options for its students, including eight residence halls, suites, and apartment-style housing, including housing for students with families in its East Campus Apartments. Additionally, to accommodate an increasing need for student housing, CSUMB’s Promontory Apartments were opened in the fall of 2015 and offer upper-division students 176 two- to four-bedroom units of single occupancy and double occupancy rooms (up to 723 new student beds).
8 http://www.fora.org/Projects.html, Fort Ord Reuse Authority. Accessed January 18, 2016. 9 CSUMB University Fact Book, “Enrollment Overview”. https://csumb.edu/iar/enrollment/, accessed December 13, 2022. 10 Master Plan Guidelines 2022. https://csumb.edu/facilities/planning/2022-master-plan-guidelines/.

Packet Page 240
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-30

9. Extremely Low Income Households
Extremely low income (ELI) households, defined as those earning below 30% of the median family income, face housing problems mostly related to cost burdens. This subset earns income that is nearly equivalent to the federal poverty line. According to the 2015-2019 CHAS, Seaside has approximately 1,425 households with incomes at or below 30% of the household area median income. Table App-28 shows the distribution of ELI households by household type and tenure.

About 77% of ELI households are renters and 23% are owner-households. About 50% of all the ELI owner households are elderly households. Elderly households also make up a large share of the ELI renter population - about 24%. Further, more than one third (37%) of all elderly households are considered ELI.

Housing the extremely-low income population can be especially challenging. Table App-28 also shows the incidence of housing problems for ELI households by household type and tenure. The vast majority of extremely low income households face a high incidence of housing problems, defined as a cost burden greater than 30% of income, overcrowding, and/or residing in a unit without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. About 81% of ELI households were experiencing at least one housing problem according to the 2015-2019 CHAS data. ELI renter households were more likely to experience at least one housing problem at 87%, compared to 59% of ELI owner households. Renter ELI households experience cost burdens at higher rates than owner households (87% of renters compared to 72% of owner households). A substantial finding in this analysis is that 100% of large renter households and large owner households experience at least one housing problem.

Table App-28: Extremely Low-Income Household Problems by HH Type Household by Type,
Income & Housing
Problem
Renters Owners
Total
Elderly Households
Small
Fam
Large
Fam
Total
Renters Elderly
Small
Fam
Large
Fam
Total
Owners
Ext. Low Income
(0-30% AMI)
260 460 60 1,100 150 65 15 325 1,425
% of all households 36.6% 15.5% 7.0% 17.4% 8.4% 4.1% 3.3% 7.6% 13.4% with any housing
problems

82.7% 83.7% 100.0% 87.3% 56.7% 84.6% 100.0% 58.5% 80.7% with cost burden >30% 82.7% 82.6% 100.0% 86.8% 93.3% 69.2% 100.0% 72.3% 83.5% with cost burden >50% 78.8% 73.9% 100.0% 80.5% 56.7% 69.2% 0.0% 50.8% 73.7% Note: HUD CHAS (Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) data is based on tabulations from the American Community Survey (ACS) and has a smaller sample size than the Decennial Census. Due to the smaller sample size, the data presented may have significant margins of error, particularly for smaller geographies. The intent of the data is to show general proportions of household need, not exact numbers Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 2015-2019.

H. Publicly Assisted Rental Housing

1. Tenant-Based Housing Choice Vouchers
The Housing Choice Voucher program is the federal government’s major program for assisting extremely low and very low income households, the elderly, and the disabled with finding decent, safe, and sanitary housing in the private market. Because the rental assistance is provided on behalf of the family or individual, participants are able to find and lease privately owned housing, including single-family homes, townhouses, and apartments from landlords who accept vouchers. The Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM) coordinates and administers Section 8 rental assistance on behalf of the City of Seaside.

2. Project-Based Rental Housing Assistance
Housing units developed with public subsidies are an important source of affordable housing to lower income households. Preserving the long-term affordability of such housing units is usually Packet Page 241
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-31
the most cost-effective means to providing decent and affordable housing to the lower income households in a community. Recognizing this important resource, State Housing Element law requires that a jurisdiction examine the potential loss of publicly subsidized multi-family rental housing for lower income households due to expiration of deed restrictions, affordability covenants, and/or subsidy contracts. This section evaluates the publicly assisted multi-family rental housing in Seaside that is at risk of converting to market-rate housing and the cost to preserve or replace the at-risk units. Resources and programs for preservation or replacement are discussed in later sections.

Table App-29 is an inventory of publicly assisted rental housing projects in Seaside. A total of 447 assisted units are provided in five developments, utilizing a variety of federal and local programs. These programs include HUD Section 8 and Section 202 Programs, as well as the City’s own Inclusionary Housing and Density Bonus provisions.

Table App-29: Inventory of Assisted Rental Housing
Development Name Total Units Household Type Funding Source Expiration of
Affordability
Hannon Assembled Apartments 133 Family LIHTC 12/17/2019 Section 8 (85 units) 2/28/2039
Del Monte Manor 192 Family Section 8 (98 units) 12/31/2041 5200 Coe Avenue 36 Family Inclusionary Housing
Requirement
9/2063
Villa Del Monte 80 Senior Section 202 9/1/2019
1491 Contra Costa Street 6 Formerly Homeless Inclusionary Housing and Density Bonus
Perpetuity
Total 447
Sources: City of Seaside; HUD Multifamily Housing databases (www.huduser.org), 2017.

3. Units at Risk of Converting to Market Rate
State law requires that the City identify, analyze, and propose programs to preserve existing multi-family rental units that are eligible to convert to non-low-income housing uses due to termination of subsidy contract, mortgage prepayment, or expiring use restrictions during a 10-year period commencing on the statutory deadline of the Housing Element update. Thus, this at-risk housing analysis covers from 2023 through 2033. During this 10-year analysis period, no project is at potential risk of converting to market-rate housing.

Villa Del Monte is a nonprofit-owned development for seniors, with its Section 202 loan matured in 2019. With the loan being paid off already, the financial stability of this project is greatly enhanced. Furthermore, because of its nonprofit ownership with a mission to provide affordable housing, this project is identified by the California Housing Partnership as at no risk of converting to market-rate housing.

Hannon Assembled Apartments has an eligible expiration date of 2019. As the project has a longterm Section 8 contract, this project will remain affordable past the planning period of this Housing Element. The remaining units under the Tax Credit program will also remain affordable so that all 133 units in the Hannon Apartments project are expected to remain affordable during the Sixth Cycle planning period.

Del Monte Manor, the City’s largest affordable housing complex, will be receiving $20 million of upgrades. The City provided Del Monte Manor with a bridge loan for this effort. With the additional funding for improvements, the long-term use of this development as affordable housing is guaranteed.

Packet Page 242
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-32
I. Estimates of Existing Housing Need
The Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) developed by the Census for HUD provides detailed information on housing needs by income level for different types of households in Seaside. The latest detailed CHAS data, based on the 2015-2019 ACS, is displayed in Table App-30. Housing issues considered by CHAS include:
• Units with physical defects (lacking complete kitchen or bathroom); • Overcrowded conditions (housing units with more than one person per room); • Housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 30% of gross income; or • Severe housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 50% of gross income.

The types of housing problems experienced by Seaside households varied according to household income, type and tenure. Major problems identified include:
• In Seaside, renter-households have higher rates of housing problems than owner households (73% versus 32%).
• All (100%) extremely low income large family renter and owner households have housing problems.
• The majority (82%) of elderly renters had at least one housing problem.

Packet Page 243
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-33
Table App-30: Estimating Housing Needs
Household by Type, Income & Housing
Problem
Renters Owners
Total
Elderly Households
Small
Families
Large
Families
Total
Renters Elderly
Small
Families
Large
Families
Total
Owners
Ext. Low Income (0-30% AMI) 260 460 60 1,100 150 65 15 325 1,425 with any housing problems 82.7% 83.7% 100.0% 87.3% 56.7% 84.6% 100.0% 58.5% 80.7% with cost burden > 30% 82.7% 82.6% 100.0% 86.8% 93.3% 69.2% 100.0% 72.3% 83.5% with cost burden > 50% 78.8% 73.9% 100.0% 80.5% 56.7% 69.2% 0.0% 50.8% 73.7% Very Low Income (31-50% AMI) 155 495 260 1,250 305 70 15 485 1,735 with any housing problems 96.8% 97.0% 100.0% 98.4% 31.1% 78.6% 300.0% 49.5% 84.7% with cost burden > 30% 96.8% 96.0% 100.0% 98.0% 31.1% 64.3% 200.0% 44.3% 83.0% with cost burden > 50% 41.9% 61.6% 71.2% 58.0% 21.3% 64.3% 100.0% 35.1% 51.6% Low Income (51-80% AMI) 190 570 290 1,395 410 245 65 745 2,140 with any housing problems 76.3% 76.3% 91.4% 83.5% 43.9% 49.0% 76.9% 49.0% 71.5% with cost burden > 30% 73.7% 67.5% 70.7% 72.4% 43.9% 49.0% 61.5% 47.7% 63.8% with cost burden > 50% 34.2% 20.2% 8.6% 22.2% 13.4% 18.4% 0.0% 15.4% 19.9% Moderate/Above Moderate Income (81% + AMI) 105 1,440 250 2,475 920 1,215 355 2,725 5,200 with any housing problems 66.7% 52.4% 84.0% 51.7% 12.5% 21.4% 53.5% 21.8% 36.1% with cost burden > 30% 57.1% 38.2% 28.0% 33.1% 13.0% 18.5% 21.1% 16.5% 24.4% with cost burden > 50% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 2.0% 1.6% 2.1% 0.0% 1.5% 1.7% Total Households 710 2,965 860 6,325 1,785 1,595 450 4,275 10,600 with any housing problems 81.7% 69.3% 92.4% 73.3% 26.6% 30.7% 66.7% 32.5% 56.8% with cost burden > 30% 79.6% 60.4% 69.2% 63.4% 30.0% 27.3% 35.6% 29.3% 49.7% with cost burden > 50% 47.2% 27.2% 31.4% 31.1% 12.3% 10.0% 3.3% 11.5% 23.2% Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 2015-2019.

Note: HUD CHAS (Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) data is based on tabulations from the American Community Survey (ACS) and has a smaller sample size than the Decennial Census. Due to the smaller sample size, the data presented may have significant margins of error, particularly for smaller geographies. The intent of the data is to show general proportions of household need, not exact numbers.

Packet Page 244
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element 34
Section 3: Housing Constraints
Various nongovernmental factors, governmental regulations, and environmental issues pose constraints to the provision of adequate and affordable housing. These constraints may result in housing that is not affordable to lower and moderate income households, or may render residential construction market prices economically infeasible for developers. This section analyzes these potential constraints.

A. Nongovernmental Constraints
Nongovernmental constraints refer to economic and market factors that impact the maintenance, development, and improvement of affordable housing. Although every community is impacted to varying degrees by market constraints, the City of Seaside has instituted policies and programs to offset the impact of market forces, and conserve and expand the availability of safe, decent, and affordable housing opportunities.

1. Market Constraints
Several local and regional constraints hinder the ability to accommodate the demand for housing in Seaside. The City is located near both scenic Monterey Bay and the Silicon Valley, and with the City of Marina, Seaside is home to California State University at Monterey Bay. The attractive location and comparatively less expensive homes than in the region contribute to a high demand for Seaside housing.

Construction Labor Shortage and Construction Costs
Construction costs differ according to type of housing development, with multi-family housing being generally less expensive to construct than single-family homes. However, variations within each construction type exist depending on the size of the unit, and the number and quality of amenities provided. Construction costs can be broken down into two primary categories:
materials and labor. A major component of the cost of housing is the cost of building materials, such as wood and wood-based products, cement, asphalt, roofing materials, and pipe. The availability and demand for such materials affect prices for these goods.

Another key component of construction costs is labor. California is 200,000 construction workers short to meet Governor Newsom’s housing goals. This number comes from a study for Smart Cities Prevail. The study finds that California has lost about 200,000 construction workers since 2006. Many lost their job during the recession and found work in other industries. USC housing economist Gary Painter also says that California has “a shortage of construction workers at the price people want to pay.” However, the dilemma is that higher pay for construction workers would increase the overall construction costs for housing. In some cases, developers are “importing” workers from out of state for the construction work and pay for their temporary housing during the construction periods.

One indicator of construction costs is Building Valuation Data compiled by the International Code Council (ICC). The unit costs compiled by the ICC include structural, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical work, in addition to interior finish and normal site preparation. The data are national and do not take into account regional differences, nor include the price of the land upon which the building is built. According to the latest Building Valuation Data released in August 2022,11 the national average for development costs per square foot for apartments and single-family homes in 2021 are as follows:
11 https://www.iccsafe.org/wp-content/uploads/BVD-BSJ-AUG2022.pdf Packet Page 245
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-35
• Type I or II, R-2 Residential Multifamily: $200.50 to $227.64 per square foot • Type V Wood Frame, R-2 Residential Multifamily: $153.00 to $158.99 per square foot • Type V Wood Frame, R-3 Residential One and Two Family Dwelling: $166.08 to $176.52 per square foot
• R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facilities generally range between $193.49 to $269.11 per square foot
In general, construction costs can be lowered by increasing the number of units in a development, until the scale of the project requires a different construction type that commands a higher per square foot cost.

The cost of raw land typically accounts for a large share of total housing production costs as well as the necessary improvements that must be made to a particular site. While there is not much land for sale, a 0.17-acre lot in Seaside was recently advertised for sale for $275,000 on Realtor.com.12 This means the price of land is about $1.4 million per acre. However, in recent years increase in material and labor costs have dramatically increased the per unit costs. During the Fifth Cycle Housing element, development pro formas for several affordable housing projects in the region indicated the cost of developing an affordable unit averaged between $280,000 and $300,000, including the cost of land. By contrast, the most recent affordable housing project in the area, a 65-unit project in East Garrison located between Marina and Salinas, is costing nonprofit developer CHISPA $700,569 per unit. This increase has been recent, given that in 2019, a 47-unit Junsay Oaks senior apartment complex completed by CHISPA in Marina cost about $361,700 per unit.13
Construction Financing
Construction loans are rarely available for over 75% of the future project value for multi-family developments. This means that developers must usually supply at least 25% of the project value upfront, and perhaps more if the total cost is more than 75% of the estimated value of the project.

The financing of a residential project, particularly affordable housing is quite complex. The level of subsidies required for affordable projects typically necessitate the pooling of multiple funding sources. Some State housing programs require site control as a prerequisite for applying for funding. However, site control is the most challenging aspect of affordable housing development when nonprofit developers have limited resources to compete for the land available on the market.

As described later in this document, the City supports the production of affordable housing by allocating water credits to developments affordable to lower income households. Other incentives include the State Density Bonus law and mixed-use, land use designations that offer higher allowable densities.

Timing and Density
Non-governmental market constraints can also include timing between project approval and requests for building permits. In most cases, this may be contingent upon the developer’s inability to respond to requests for corrections to construction documents, to secure financing for construction or construction crew. In Seaside, the most typical housing development activities are ADUs, which often proceed to construction within one month of entitlement.

City has experienced limited housing development in the past few years. The recent Seaside Market and Ascent projects both achieved 90% or above of the allowable maximum density. 12 https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/Judson-St_Seaside_CA_93955_M98690-64750?from=srp-list-card 13 https://www.montereycountyweekly.com/opinion/mcnow_intro/why-affordable-housing-does-not-comecheap/article_e0ebcc50-7d7d-11ec-943e-6b8fbea90d60.html Packet Page 246
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-36
Furthermore, the proprietor of the Parker Flats site, which obtained approval for a density of 34% below the maximum allowable limit, has indicated an interest in potentially reformulating the project which may achieve a higher density. Overall, due to the limited development applications, the City is able to process these projects in a timely manner complying with the Streamlining Act. For projects that have received entitlements they typically take 6 months to one year to pull building permits due to factors such as financing, labor shortage, and timing for the market.

Mortgage Financing
The availability of financing affects a person’s ability to purchase or improve a home. Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), lending institutions are required to disclose information on the disposition of loan applications by the income, gender, and race of the applicants. This requirement applies to all loan applications for home purchases, improvements, and refinancing, whether financed at market rate or with government assistance.

Table App-31 summarizes the disposition of loan applications submitted to financial institutions in 2021 for home purchase, refinance, and home improvement loans in Seaside. Included is information on loan outcomes (i.e., the proportions of applications that were approved, were denied, or were incomplete or withdrawn by the applicant).

Table App-31: Disposition of Home Loans - 2021
Loan Type Total Applicants Percent Approved Percent Denied Percent Other Conventional Purchase 217 74.7% 4.6% 20.7%
Government-backed Purchase 46 58.7% 10.9% 30.4%
Home Improvement 46 45.7% 28.3% 26.1%
Refinance 1,179 64.6% 12.4% 23.0%
Total 1,488 65.3% 11.7% 23.0%
Notes:

This data is the sum of the loan applications for Tracts within Seaside city limits: Census Tracts 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, and 140. “Approved” includes loans approved by the lenders whether or not accepted by the applicant. “Other” includes loan applications that were either withdrawn or closed for incompleteness.

Source: FFIEC Home Mortgage Disclosure Act MSA/MD Aggregate Reports-- Disposition of loan applications, by location of property and type of loan, 2021.

Home Purchase Loans
In 2021, a total of 217 households applied for conventional loans to purchase homes in Seaside.

The overall loan approval rate was 75% and 5% of applications were denied. Fewer applications (46 applications) were submitted for government-backed loans (e.g., FHA, VA) in Seaside. Among applications for government-backed home purchase loans in 2022, 59% were approved and 11% were denied.

Refinance Loans
Seaside residents filed 1,179 applications for home refinance loans in 2021 – the most of any loan type. This is likely because many homeowners with adjustable rate mortgages or unfavorable fixed rate mortgages chose to refinance their home loans after federal interest rates were lowered significantly and robust house price appreciation in 2021. According to Freddie Mac’s Report on Trends in Mortgage Refinancing Activity in 2021,14 house prices rose 17.7% in 2021, compared to an 11.3% growth in 2020. Approximately 65% of these home refinance applications were approved, while about 12% were denied.
14 https://www.freddiemac.com/research/insight/20220425-trends-mortgage-refinancing-activity Packet Page 247
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-37
Home Improvement Loans
Applications for home improvement loans had the lowest approval rates of any loan type. Only 46% of these applications were approved and 28% were denied by lending institutions in 2021.

The large proportion of home improvement loan denials may be explained by the nature of these loans. Most applicants already maintain a mortgage loan and therefore have high debt-to-income ratio to qualify for additional financing.

Foreclosures
Foreclosure activities have been limited in Seaside in recent years. As of July 2019, five homes were listed as bank-owned or foreclosures on whereforeclosures.com. However, 27 properties were in pre-foreclosure sales. Nevertheless, this level of foreclosure activities was significantly below the level during housing recession (when 174 foreclosures were reported a 6-month period between June 2008 and January 2009).

2. Community Response to Intensification
In general, the Seaside community understands the need for additional housing. Out-of-town property owners seem very receptive to increases in density, as it allows them to build more units and collect more rent. Many if not most of the ADUs proposed in the City are being built on investment properties by property owners who do not reside on-site. Local opposition to ADUs is coming from the property owners who live on-site, as it presumes to affect their quality of life and enjoyment of their property. In many cases their home represents their primary asset and they do not have the resources to relocate to other properties within the community, especially if their property values are diminished by additional adjacent housing. Property owners cite lack of on-street parking and elimination of views as their primary concerns. There is a need for more housing in the community, and while the community understands this in the abstract, many still feel their quality of life is under attack. Another group that opposes intensification includes slow- or no-growth advocates (such as Landwatch). These organizations are monitoring the redevelopment of the former Fort Ord, another area with significant residential development potential.

B. Governmental Constraints
Local policies and regulations can impact the price of housing and, in particular, affordable housing. Local policies and regulations may include land use controls, site improvement requirements, fees and exactions, permit processing procedures, and other issues. This section discusses potential governmental constraints to housing investment as well as measures to mitigate potential impacts.

The City complies with the Government Transparency bill. Planning and development regulations, including the General Plan,15 Zoning Ordinance,16 fee schedules,17 and other information that facilitates the development and improvement of properties in the City is available online.

1. Land Use Controls
The Land Use Element of the Seaside General Plan sets forth policies for residential development. These land use policies, coupled with zoning regulations, establish the amount and distribution of land to be allocated for different uses. Housing supply and costs are affected by the amount of land designated for residential use, the density at which residential development is permitted, and the standards that govern the character of development. This Housing Element update is part of the comprehensive update to the General Plan, but is entirely consistent with the existing 2004 General Plan.
15 https://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/269/Seaside-General-Plan 16 https://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/270/Seaside-Zoning-Code 17 https://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/196/Fees-Charges-PDF
Packet Page 248
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-38
The proposed Land Use Element provides for the following land use designations allow for residential development:
• Neighborhood Low: Provides for the retention, maintenance, and development of existing single-family residential neighborhoods. Allowable density is up to eight units per acre (one unit per parcel, plus a second unit where allowed). • Neighborhood Medium: Provides for the development of a wide range of low and moderate density living accommodations, including attached/detached single-family and house-form multi-family structures. Allowable density is 8 to 15 units per acre. • Neighborhood General: Allows for a variety of residential building types that co-exist in close proximity to one another, including single-family, townhomes, walk-up apartments, and low-rise multi-family residential. Allowable density is 15 to 30 units per acre. • Neighborhood High: Allows for multi-family residences at a range of densities and building types from townhomes to four-story, multi-unit buildings. Allowable density is up to 45 units per acre.
• Employment: Provides area for a range of employment uses to expand and diversify the City’s economy. Allows live/work units. Allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is 0.65 to 2.5. • Mixed Use Low: Provides for areas with a wide variety of existing residential and commercial uses. Provides for additional housing and expansion of neighborhood-serving retail and commercial uses. Allowable uses include mixed retail/residential, mixed office/residential, and standalone live/work and moderate density residential. Allowable FAR is 2.5.
• Mixed Use High: Supports new lively, thriving areas in the City by accommodating multistory, mixed-use buildings at higher intensity and/or a diverse mix of uses. Provides for vertical and horizontal mixed-use development. Allowable uses include mixed retail/residential, mixed office/residential, and standalone high density residential in certain areas. Allowable FAR is 3.0.
• West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan: Implements the West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan. Provides for mixed use and standalone high density residential development up to 60 units per acre.
• Future Seaside East Specific Plan (SP): To establish neighborhood character intensities and uses in Surplus II, 26-Acre area and Seaside East.
• Recreational Commercial: Provides for outdoor recreational facilities. Allowable uses include a limited amount of residential. Allowable FAR is 0.2. • Military: Includes lands retained by the U.S. Armed Forces for on-going military-related activities within the former Fort Ord Boundary. Allowable uses include military housing.

Until the new General Plan 2040 is adopted, the City will continue to provide for housing under its existing General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The City will conduct a comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance to implement the new General Plan 2040 when adopted. In the interim, the new General Plan land use designations can be implemented through the existing zoning districts in the current Zoning Ordinance. Table App-32 summarizes the land use designations and zoning districts that either allow residential development as a permitted use or through consideration of a discretionary process, via a Use Permit (UP).

Packet Page 249
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-39
Table App-32: Land Use Designations and Zoning Implementation Proposed General Plan
Land Use Designation
Existing General Plan (2004)
Land Use Designation Corresponding Existing Zone District(s) Neighborhood Low Low Density Single Family Residential Single-Family Residential (RS-8) Neighborhood Medium Medium Density Single Family Residential Single-Family Residential (RS-12) Neighborhood General Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential (RM) Neighborhood High High Density Residential High Density Residential (RH) Mixed Use Low
Mixed Use High
Mixed Use Commercial Mixed-Use (CMX)
Community Commercial (CC)
Employment Regional Commercial (CRG)
Heavy Commercial (CH)
Recreational Commercial N/A Fort Ord Visitor-Serving Commercial District (V-FO) Military Military Military (M)
Source: Seaside Zoning Ordinance, October 2022.
*In the V-FO zone district, property development standards for residential uses shall be those applicable in the RS-8 (Single-Family Residential) zoning district.

2. West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan
The West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan was adopted in 2010 to revitalize the City of Seaside’s West Broadway Avenue. The Specific Plan Area is located in the southwest portion of the City, immediately south of the Seaside Auto Mall. Roberts Lake and Laguna Grande are to the southwest, while the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreation Trail and Highway 1 separate the Plan Area from the Bay.

The development standards for the West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan are established to encourage redevelopment of existing properties into more urbanized, high-intensity uses between three and five stories, with hotels going up to eight stories. The reduced parking requirements for development in the West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan intend to minimize the impact of parking and re-enforce the intended transit and pedestrian-oriented character.

Overall, the Specific Plan anticipates accommodating 213 mixed-use residential units and 199 multi-family units in various areas:
• Mixed Use (MX): 30-60 units per acre
• High Density Residential (RH): 20-30 units per acre
• Medium Density Residential (RM): 10-20 units per acre For all residential and mixed-use development, the parking requirements are 1.5 spaces per unit with two or more bedrooms, and one space per studio or one-bedroom unit.

Packet Page 250
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-40
Figure App-5: West Broadway Urban Village SP – Land Use Designations

3. Inclusionary Housing Program
Inclusionary housing describes a local government requirement that a specified percentage of new housing units be reserved for, and affordable to, lower and moderate income households.

The goal of inclusionary housing programs is to increase the supply of affordable housing commensurate with new market-rate development in a jurisdiction. This can result in improved regional jobs-housing balances and foster greater economic and racial integration within a community. The policy is most effective in areas experiencing a strong demand for housing.

The City of Seaside has adopted an Inclusionary Housing Program (IHP) in its Zoning Ordinance (Section 17.32.020) to expand affordable housing options in Seaside. Each residential development, of three or more units, including condominium conversions, is required to provide at least 20% of their total units affordable to moderate, low or very low income households. The number of inclusionary units required is determined at the tentative or parcel map stage or at the issuance of a building permit, if a processing map is not required. At least one third of the required inclusionary units must be restricted to low income households. An additional one third of inclusionary units must be restricted for very low income households and the remaining third can be moderate income. To encourage the development of low and very low income housing the City Council has the authority to permit the following equivalents:

1. Each very low income unit is equivalent to two moderate-income units

2. Each low income unit is equivalent to 1.5 moderate income units.

Inclusionary units can be for sale or rental. For sale inclusionary units must be priced at an affordable price with renewed restrictions upon each change of ownership up to the 40-year affordability period. The maximum sale price for the resale of an inclusionary housing unit must be the lower of either the fair market value or the seller’s lawful purchase price increased by the lesser of the rate of increase of area median income during the seller’s ownership or the rate at which the consumer price index increased during the seller’s ownership. Sellers are able to recover the market value of capital improvements made to the property.

Packet Page 251
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-41
The inclusionary housing policy is not a constraint to housing development because it includes reasonable exemptions and fosters the creation of affordable housing. Affordable housing developments with units that are very low, low, and moderate income restricted are exempt from the ordinance, as is housing constructed by a government agency and second/accessory dwelling units. The City of Seaside offers three alternatives to developers to satisfy inclusionary housing requirements:

1. Off Site Construction: Units can be constructed off site if the inclusionary units will be located in an area that the Council finds is in greater need of affordable housing.

2. Land Dedication: In lieu of building inclusionary units, a developer can choose to dedicate land to the City suitable for the construction of inclusionary units that the Council determines to be of equivalent or greater value than is produced by applying the inclusionary obligation.

3. Combination: The Council may accept any combination of on-site construction, offsite construction, in-lieu fees and land dedication that at least equal the cost of providing inclusionary units on-site construction. The value of a proposed land dedication will be determined by a City appointed appraiser.

The Council can approve, conditionally approve, or reject any alternative proposed by a developer. Any approval or conditional approval must be based on the finding that affordable housing creation would be better served by a proposed alternative. When making a finding, the Council must consider the following:

1. Whether implementation of an alternative would overly concentrate inclusionary units within any specific area and, if so, must reject the alternative unless the undesirable concentration of inclusionary units is offset by other identified benefits that flow from implementation of the alternative is issue; and

2. The extent to which other factors affect the feasibility of prompt construction of the inclusionary units on the property, such as costs and delays, the need for an appraisal, site design, zoning, infrastructure, clear title, grading and environmental review.

A developer can also apply for an adjustment or waiver of inclusionary housing requirements which the Council determines. To receive an adjustment or waiver, the developer must make a showing when they are applying for a first approval for the residential development and/or as part of any appeal that the City provides as part of the process for the first approval. In determining whether a developer is eligible for an adjustment the Council assumes the following:

1. That the developer is subject to the inclusionary housing requirement or in-lieu fee;

2. The extent to which the developer will benefit from inclusionary incentives;

3. That the developer will be obligated to provide the most economical inclusionary units feasible in terms of construction, design, location and tenure; and

4. That the developer is likely to obtain other housing subsidies where such funds are reasonably available.

The Inclusionary Housing Policy does not constrain housing development in the City and is consistent with State law (AB 1505) that authorizes inclusionary policies of up to 15% for lower income households. During the past few years, the City achieved several affordable housing units through its Inclusionary Housing Policy and Density Bonus provisions:
• Ascent: Nine multi-family buildings and one mixed-use building for a total of 106 residential units and 4,079 square feet of commercial floor area. Sixteen (16) rental housing units are restricted to occupancy by low-income households for a period of 55 years.
• Campus Town: 1,485 units consisting of single-family dwellings and townhouses, condominium units, apartments and associated improvements on 85 acres of the former Packet Page 252
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-42
Fort Ord military base. The Project includes 225 affordable housing units (350 equivalent inclusionary units, or 23%).

4. Residential Development Standards
Seaside regulates the type, location, density, and scale of residential development primarily through the Zoning Ordinance. Zoning regulations are designed to protect and promote the health, safety, and general welfare of residents, implement the policies of the City’s General Plan, and preserve the character and integrity of neighborhoods. Table App-33 summarizes the current and most pertinent residential development standards in Seaside. Upon completion of the General Plan update, the City will embark on a comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, with appropriate development standards to implement the new General Plan land use policy. The CH zone functions primarily as the City’s industrial zone (uses similar to industrial uses). Only live/work housing is allowed in CH zoning district. In addition, per SB 330, the City will develop objective design standards that will provide a preliminary application process for residential development.

Packet Page 253
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-43
Table App-33: Residential Development Standards
Standard RS-8 RS-12 RM RH V-FO* CRG CMX, CC CH
Min. Lot Size 5,500 sf 3,750 sf 3,750 sf 3,750 sf 5,500 sf 20,000 sf 4,000 sf 12,000 sf Min. Lot Width 40’ 50’ 50’ 40’ 100’ 40’ 100’
Max. Density 8 dua/1 du per
parcel, plus second
unit where allowed
by Section

17.52.230.
15 dua/3 du per site 25 dua 10 dua Mixed-use; up to
25 du/ac (max
height)
25 du/ac;
Live/work no
density limit as
long as within
FAR
Mixed use; up to
1 du for each 1,742
s.f. of site area
25 du/ac;
Live/work no
density limit as long
as within FAR
Live/work units
only; no density
limit as long as
within FAR
Setbacks
Front 15’ 15’ 15’ 15’ 0’ 0’ 10’
Side - Interior 5’ minimum,
10’ combined;
10’ (common wall or
zero lot line)
Single Dwellings:
5’ (<24’ tall); 15’ combined
with 5’ on one side (>24’
tall);
10’ (common wall or zero
lot line)
Single Dwellings:
5’ (<24’ tall); 15’ combined
with 5’ on one side (>24’
tall);
10’ (common wall or zero
lot line)
5’ minimum, 10’
combined;
10’ (common wall
or zero lot line)
30 ft total, 18 ft
minimum on one
side and 12 ft
minimum on the
other.
0’ 0’
Other Buildings:
5’ (<24’ tall), 30’ combined,
with 12’ on one side (>24’
tall)
Other Buildings:
5’ (<24’ tall); 30’ combined,
with 12’ on one side (>24’
tall)
Side – Street 10’ 10’ 10’ (single dwellings)
15’ (other buildings)
10’ 0’ 0’ 0’
Rear 15’
Attached garage 13’
15’
Attached garage 13’
15’ (<24’ tall)
20’ (>24’ tall)
15’ 0’ 0’ 0’
Max. FAR 0.45(1) 0.45(1) 0.45(1) 0.45(1) 3.0 for hotels; 1.0 for other uses

2.0(2) 0.50
Max. Lot
Coverage(3)
65% 65% 60% 65% 90% N/A 90%
Packet Page 254
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-44
Table App-33: Residential Development Standards
Standard RS-8 RS-12 RM RH V-FO* CRG CMX, CC CH
Min. Open Space None Single-family: None
Multi-family, 2-3 du: 200 sf
common plus 150 sf/du
private
Single-family: None
Multi-family, 2-4 du: 200 sf
common plus 150 sf/du
private;
5-10 du: 500 sf common
plus 150 sf/du private
None N/A N/A N/A
Max. Height 24’(4)(5) 24’(4)(6)
36’(7)
24’(4)(6)
48’(7)
24’(4)(5) Lesser of 6
stories or 72 ft
4 stories
or 48’
Lesser of 3
stories or 36 ft
Source: Seaside Zoning Ordinance, 2022.
dua = dwelling units per acre; *property development standards for residential uses in VF-O shall be those applicable in the RS-8 (Single-Family Residential) zoning district.

Notes:

1. Exclude garages up to 440 sf from FAR calculations.

2. FAR for CC district is 2.0 in Broadway Corridor; 0.50 elsewhere in CC district.

3. Buildings and pavement.

4. Architectural Review approval required for structures over 18’ tall.

5. Maximum 30’ height if height is compatible with lot size and surrounding properties, consistent with building size, and allows for exceptional architectural design.

6. Single-Family, Duplex, and Triplex units

7. Multi-family (4+) units
Packet Page 255
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-45
Lot Standards
The minimum lot sizes for residential lots in Seaside range from 3,750 square feet to 5,500 square feet. The RS-12, RM, and RH zones allow small lots of 3,750 square feet for single-family as well as high density residential units. The commercial mixed-use zones (CMX and CC) allow a minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet, while the RS and V-FO zones both have minimum lot sizes of 5,500 square feet. The CH and CRG zones require a minimum lot size of 12,000 sf and 20,000 sf, respectively. Lot widths are 40 feet in the RS, commercial zones, and V-FO, and are 50 feet in the medium and high density residential zones, and 100 feet in the CRG and CH zones.

These minimum lot size standards are typical and cover the majority of the City and do not constrain residential development.

Floor-to-Area Ratio (FAR)
Seaside allows a maximum FAR of 0.45 in RS-8, RS-12, RM, RH, and V-FO zoning districts. This FAR maximum may be a constraint to achieving maximum density of 15 units per acre and 25 units per acre, respectively. The development standards under the Zoning Ordinance update will focus on density in residential zones, removing FAR requirements. FAR requirements will only be applied for Mixed-Use Low and Mixed-Use High under the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Update. The City will ensure appropriate FARs are established to facilitate the development of multi-family and mixed-use development in mixed use zones, accommodating the maximum allowable densities.

Lot Coverage
The Zoning Ordinance establishes a maximum lot coverage of 65% for the RS, RM, and V-FO zones and 60% for the RH zone. Commercial zones where residential uses are allowed set a maximum lot coverage of 90% for residential and residential mixed-use developments. The City’s lot coverage standards are typical and allow developments to achieve the maximum allowable density.

Yard Setbacks
Commercial mixed-use zones in Seaside have no setback requirements, except in the CH (10- foot front setback) and CRG (30-foot total side setback combined total) zones. All residential zones and the V-FO zone have a 15-foot front setback, 10- to 15-foot combined side setbacks, and 15- to 20-foot rear setbacks. These setbacks are intended to create a safe and visually cohesive aesthetic to residential development throughout the City.

Height Limits
Seaside allows building heights up to 24 feet in low density residential zones and in the V-FO zone, accommodating up to two stories with review approval. Multi-family housing can be as high as 36 and 48 feet in the medium and high density residential zones, respectively.

Commercial zones where residential uses are permitted can accommodate buildings up to 72 feet (lesser of six stories). These height limits can accommodate three- to four-story buildings, allowing the achievement of maximum permitted densities.

Parking Standards
In addition to the development standards identified above, Seaside requires a certain number of parking spaces to be provided for each new residential unit. The requirements are identified in Table App-34. Typically, the cost associated with parking construction (particularly covered parking) can be viewed as a constraint to affordable housing development, particularly for multifamily housing. Seaside’s parking requirements are designed to accommodate vehicle ownership rates associated with different residential uses. The City also offers reduced parking Packet Page 256
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-46
requirements for senior housing. Overall, the City’s parking standards for multi-family and senior housing developments are generally comparable to the basic parking standards established by the state density bonus law for affordable housing projects. However, guest parking requirement (one space per unit) may be constraining to multi-family development. The City will review these parking standards as part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update. Furthermore, new State Density Bonus provisions require additional reductions in parking requirements if the project is located close to public transportation.

Under AB 2097, cities cannot impose a minimum automobile parking requirement on most development projects located within a half-mile radius of a major transit stop. Most of the City is located within ½ mile from major transit stops (Figure App-6) and can be eligible for the parking reductions of AB 2097. In addition, requirements for attached single-family units (condos and townhomes) at two spaces within a garage plus one space for guest parking may be a constraint for this type of housing. The City will review parking requirements for garage/covered parking for all unit types, including multi-family and condominiums, as a potential constraint on development as part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Update (Program 16).

Figure App-6: Existing Land Areas Covered Within ½ Mile Transit Packet Page 257
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-47
In addition, the City’s parking standards are outdated with respect to a number of special residential uses that are regulated by State law:
• Emergency/transitional shelters: Table 3-8 of the Zoning Ordinance states that parking requirements for emergency/transitional shelters are “determined by use permit.” SB 2 (2007) requires emergency shelters to be permitted by right (without discretionary review or use permit) in designated zone(s). AB 139 (2021) requires local jurisdictions to amend its zoning provisions for emergency shelters, establishing parking requirements based on staffing level only. Although Zoning Ordinance Section 17.52.100 specifies that emergency shelters are permitted by right in the CC zone and Census Tract 137 and in those areas shall provide one space per staff member. The Zoning Ordinance update will clarify that parking requirements for by-right shelters are based on staff level, and not subject to a use permit.

Furthermore, Government Code (§65582) defines “transitional housing” as buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculating of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future point in time that shall be no less than six months from the beginning of the assistance. State law requires transitional housing meeting state definition to be considered as a residential use subject to the same requirements as other residential uses in the same zone. Therefore, transitional housing should not be listed in the same category as emergency shelters in Zoning Ordinance Table 3-8.
• Pursuant to the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Service Act, residential care facilities serving six or fewer residents may not be subject to stricter zoning standards than other residential uses; therefore, the parking requirements in Zoning Ordinance Table 3-8 for residential care facilities should be modified to clarify this requirement.

A program has been included in the Housing Element to amend Table 3-8 of the Zoning Ordinance to ensure compliance with various state requirements as listed above.

Table App-34: Parking Standards
Unit Type Parking Spaces Required
Single-Family Detached (new
construction)
2 spaces within a garage/carport
Single dwelling or townhouse, attached
(new constriction)
2 spaces within a garage for each unit, plus 1 covered or uncovered space for each unit for guest parking
Single-family dwelling, narrow lot (less
than 50 ft)
2 spaces, at least one within a garage
Single-family dwelling with additions,
attached or detached* (existing)
0-1,200 s.f.: no additional parking requirement
1,201- 1,800 s.f.: 2 spaces, at least one covered
1,801+ s.f.: 2 covered spaces
Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex 1 covered space per dwelling unit, plus 1 space for each 2 units for guest parking Emergency/Transitional Shelter Determined by Use Permit Live-Work Unit 2 spaces for each unit, one covered space for the living space and one space for the work space for use by customers or guests
Multiple-Family (except condominiums) 1 covered space per dwelling unit, plus 1 space for each 2 units for guest parking (units up to 1,800 sf)
2 covered spaces for each unit, plus 1 covered or uncovered space for each 2 units for guest parking (units greater than 1,800 sf)
Condominiums 2 covered spaces per unit, plus 1 space per unit for guest parking Mobile Homes Outside mobile home park: 1 space per home; Within mobile home park: 2 covered spaces per home (tandem parking allowed in an attached carport) plus 1 guest space per 4 homes
Recreational vehicle parking shall be provided at the rate of 1 covered or uncovered space for every 5 units
Packet Page 258
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-48
Table App-34: Parking Standards
Unit Type Parking Spaces Required
Senior Housing 1 covered space for each unit, plus 1 covered or uncovered guest parking space for each 10 units
Residential Care Facility 1 covered space for each 2 residential units, plus 1 covered or uncovered space for each 4 units for guests and employees
Residential Second Unit 1 covered or uncovered space
*An existing garage shall not be converted unless the replacement parking is provided within a garage.

Source: City of Seaside Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.34.040, Table 3-8 Parking Requirements by Land Use July 2022.

5. Flexibility from Development Standards
Seaside provides several mechanisms to maintain flexibility in development standards. This flexibility is an important means to address limitations inherent at a specific site (e.g., topographic, geographic, physical, or otherwise), as well as provide a means to address other important goals and objectives of the City Council, such as providing affordable housing for all income groups.

6. Cumulative Analysis of Land Use Controls - Seaside Market Example The City recently approved a mixed-use project on four parcels in the West Broadway Urban Village Specific Plan, zoned both Mixed Use and High Density Residential/Mixed Use. The site is currently developed with the former Seaside Market grocery store, which has been nonoperational for a number of years. The proposed project is a five-story mixed use building with:
• 9,900 sf of commercial tenant space on the ground floor for up to 12 commercial tenants; • a total of 32 residential units totaling 17,100 sf;
• a landscaped parking area; and
• the following rooftop amenities: a tasting room featuring a 1,575 sf rooftop deck and 1,450 sf modular unit, a public rooftop deck of 3,150 sf, and a 1,180 sf indoor resident lounge.

The structure’s height ranges from 15-22 ft on the single-story portion to 48-64 ft on the fivestory portion. A condition of approval has been added to the project: Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant (or another interested party) shall obtain approval from the City of Seaside to consolidate the four existing parcels on the property, and shall submit a request for the consolidation of said parcels to the County of Monterey.

The proposed project complies with the Mixed Use zone (and High Density Residential/Mixed Use zone (development standards for a Mixed-Use Development, as summarized below:

Packet Page 259
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-49
Packet Page 260
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-50
Cumulatively, the project was able to meet most City development standards and achieve the maximum allowable density. The project only had an issue in meeting the open space requirement and had to use Density Bonus open space reductions incentives. The project qualified for Density Bonus Incentives pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 17.33.040.B.1, as over five percent of the total number of units (2 units out of 32 total) will be affordable to very low income households. As a development incentive, the requirements of Chapter 7, B.5.1.2 and B.5.2.1, of the fourth and fifth stories required to be stepped back from the third-story street walls at 10 feet minimum and the minimum two-story requirement of the single-story portion of the proposal shall not be applicable.

The City will review development standards to implement the General Plan update to ensure maximum density can be achieved as part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update.

Packet Page 261
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-51
Planned Development Permit
The Planned Development Permit is intended to provide for flexibility in the application of Zoning Ordinance standards to proposed development under limited and unique circumstances. The purpose is to allow consideration of innovation in site planning and other aspects of project design, and more effective design responses to site features, uses on adjoining properties, and environmental impacts than the Zoning Ordinance standards would produce without adjustment.

Density Bonus Ordinance
A density bonus over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the applicable zoning district is available to developers who provide affordable housing as part of their projects.

State law also entitles developers of eligible affordable and senior housing to at least one regulatory concession or incentive. Density bonuses, together with the incentives and/or concessions, result in a lower average cost of land per dwelling unit thereby making the provision of affordable housing more feasible.

The City’s Density Bonus Ordinance was last updated in 2013. Since then, several changes have been made to the State Density Bonus law. These include:
• AB 2222: Eliminates density bonuses and other incentives previously available unless the developer agrees to replace pre-existing affordable units on a one-for-one basis.

Increases the required affordability period from 30 years to 55 years for all density bonus units. Furthermore, if the units that qualified an applicant for a density bonus are affordable ownership units, as opposed to rental units, they must be subject to an equity sharing model rather than a resale restriction.
• AB 2501: Makes changes to: the timeline for processing application for a density bonus; electing to accept no density increase; and determining the value of concessions and incentives.
• AB 2556: Clarifies the replacement requirements as established by AB 2222. • AB 2442: Requires a density bonus be granted for a housing development if applicant agrees to construct housing for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans, or homeless person.
• AB 1934: Provides a density bonus to a commercial development if the developer enters into an agreement for partnered housing either as a joint project or two separate projects encompassing affordable housing.
• AB 1763: Density bonus and increased incentives for 100% affordable housing projects for lower income households.
• AB 1227: Density bonus for student housing development for students enrolled at a fulltime college, and to establish prioritization for students experiencing homelessness. • AB 2345: Revised the requirements for receiving concessions and incentives, and the maximum density bonus provided from 35% to 50%.

The City of Seaside will update its density bonus ordinance to comply with these new provisions as part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance to implement the new General Plan.

Mixed-Use Districts
The City permits multi-family housing and mixed-use projects with a residential component in the CMX, CC, and CRG, CH zones, with the approval of a Use Permit. These districts permit residential development in conjunction with certain office and/or commercial uses within potential pedestrian- and transit-oriented activity centers. Seaside’s mixed-use districts have been used successfully to combine apartments with retail and offices along major thoroughfares.

This development trend is a return to the mixed land use pattern of older downtown areas.

Packet Page 262
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-52
Design Flexibility of Substandard Lots
This option provides relief from established zoning requirements for single family units on substandard lots. The standards allow exceptions to setback requirements in exchange for architectural design features to enhance the development and maximize use of remaining open space on the property. This provision of the Zoning Ordinance has been used on several occasions to foster development on lots which otherwise could not be developed.

In summary, the City of Seaside provides design flexibility in its Zoning Ordinance to facilitate and encourage infill development and housing opportunities in single-family, multi-family, and commercial zones. These incentives can be used to mitigate any potential impact of residential development standards on the cost and affordability of housing. As later illustrated in the three conceptual site plans, development standards in the City can facilitate a variety of housing types and densities, including family apartments, senior apartments, and townhomes/condominiums.

7. Coastal Zone
Pursuant to state law, a jurisdiction must maintain records of affordable housing in the Coastal Zone. Specifically, demolition of housing units previously occupied by low and moderate income households must be replaced. However, several exceptions apply:
• The conversion or demolition of a residential structure that contains fewer than three dwelling units, or, in the event that a proposed conversion or demolition involves more than one residential structure, the conversion or demolition of 10 or fewer dwelling units. • The conversion or demolition of a residential structure for purposes of a nonresidential use which is either "coastal dependent" or "coastal related" uses such as visitor-serving commercial or recreational facilities, coastal-dependent industry, or boating or harbor facilities.
• The conversion or demolition of a residential structure located within the jurisdiction that has less than 50 acres of vacant, privately owned land available for residential use within the coastal zone or three miles from the coastal zone.
• The conversion or demolition of a residential structure located within the jurisdiction, where a procedure has been established to allow an applicant for conversion or demolition to pay an in-lieu fee for affordable housing development.

Although a portion of Seaside is located in the Coastal Zone, privately held vacant lands designated for residential uses do not total more than 50 acres. Furthermore, most demolition activities that had occurred involved structures of fewer than three units. Therefore, the City has not incurred any replacement housing requirements.

Limited housing development has occurred in the City between 2015 and 2022 due to a variety of factors, such as rising material and labor costs as well as the COVID-19 pandemic. However, water availability continues to be the single largest barrier to housing development.

Nevertheless, the City has an inclusionary housing policy of 20% that is applicable citywide, including in the Coastal Zone. The City has no specific records for housing construction and demolition activities in the Coastal Zone.

The Del Monte Subarea encompasses roughly nine acres of urban area along Del Monte Boulevard from its intersection with Canyon Del Rey (Highway 218) to its intersection with West Broadway Avenue to the northeast. Roberts Lake and Laguna Grande Subareas are to the southwest, and the Beach Subarea is to the northeast on the opposite side of Highway 1 and the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreational Trail.

The Del Monte Subarea includes the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, which is to become the future location of a multimodal transit hub. The West Broadway Urban Village (WBUV) Specific Plan, including the Del Monte Subarea, was adopted in 2010. The goal of the Specific Plan is to revitalize and enhance the Del Monte Boulevard and West Broadway Avenue urban area through creation of a pedestrian-friendly Urban Village. The Specific Plan envisions the area between the railroad right-of-way and Del Monte Boulevard to be an active mixed-use Packet Page 263
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-53
commercial corridor that promotes connectivity and provides supporting uses to the future multimodal transit station and the existing and planned hotels on Canyon Del Rey Boulevard. The Del Monte Subarea current land uses include commercial and light industrial uses.

Projects proposed within the Coastal Zone are required to obtain a costal permit, either a Coastal Administrative Permit (CAP) or a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) approval from the California Coastal Commission in addition to a planning permit. When required, a Coastal Development Permit application shall be submitted to the Coastal Commission after the required City planning permit has been approved.

8. Provisions for a Variety of Housing Types
Housing Element law specifies that jurisdictions must identify sites to be made available through appropriate zoning and implement development standards to encourage and facilitate the development of housing for all economic segments of the community. This includes single-family homes, multi-family housing, accessory dwelling units, manufactured housing, mobile homes, transitional and supportive housing, farm worker housing, and emergency shelters.

Seaside provides for a wide range of housing types throughout the community. Table App-35 summarizes the housing types permitted in each of the City’s primary residential zones. Each residential use is designated by a letter denoting whether the use is permitted by right (P), requires a Minor Use Permit (MUP), Use Permit (UP), or is not permitted (–).

Table App-35: Residential Uses Permitted in Major Zones Housing Type RS RM RH CMX CC CRG CH V-FO* M
Single-Family, Detached P P P – – – – P –
Single-Family, Detached (affordable) P P P – – – – P –
Single-Family, Attached UP UP UP – – – – UP –
Single-Family, Attached (affordable) UP UP – – – – – UP – Condominium/Common interest residential subdivision UP UP UP – – – – UP – Multifamily, 2 or 3 units – P P UP – – – – –
Multifamily, 4+ units – – P UP – – – – –
Mixed Use project with a residential component – – – MUP UP UP – – – Organizational house (e.g., sorority, monastery) – UP UP – – – – – – Residential Care Facility (6 or fewer) P P P – – – – P – Residential Care Facility (7 or more) UP UP UP – UP – – UP – Accessory Dwelling Units P P P – – – – P –
Live-Work Units – – – UP UP – UP – –
Mobile Home Parks UP UP UP – – – – UP –
Emergency/Transitional Shelter UP UP UP UP P – – UP –
Military Housing – – – – – – – – P
*Property development standards for residential uses in VF-O shall be those applicable in the RS-8 (Single-Family Residential) zoning district.

Source: City of Seaside Zoning Ordinance, October 2022.

Single-family Units
Single-family homes are permitted in the RS, RM and RH zones. The RS (Single-Family Residential) zone is applied to areas of the City that are appropriate for neighborhoods of detached single-family dwellings, surrounding the more densely developed core of the City. The RM (Medium Density Residential) Zone is applied to areas of the City that are appropriate for neighborhoods with a variety of housing types including attached and detached single-family dwellings, duplexes and triplexes and some condominiums. The RH zone (High Density Residential) is applied to areas of the City that are appropriate for a mixture of multi-family housing, including apartments, townhomes and condominiums and personal offices, convalescent homes and care facilities.

The Seaside Zoning Ordinance defines single-family dwelling as a building designed for and/or occupied exclusively by one family. Single-family dwellings include, among more common types, Packet Page 264
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-54
factory built, modular housing units, constructed in compliance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and mobile homes/manufactured housing units that comply with the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974, when placed on a permanent foundation system. Attached single-family dwellings include condominiums and rowhouses. Attached single-family dwellings are permitted with a Use Permit in the RS, RM, and RH zones. Affordable attached single-family dwellings also require a Use Permit, but are only permitted in the RS and RM zones. Specifying that affordable attached single-family homes are not permitted in the RH zone while market-rate units are permitted via a Use Permit in all residential zones may be interpreted as a potential constraint to affordable housing development. As part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, the City will revise the Zoning Ordinance to prohibit single-family housing (market-rate or affordable) in RH zones to preserve the capacity designated for multi-family housing.

Multi-Family Units
Multi-family units are dwellings that are part of a structure containing one or more other dwelling units, or a non-residential use. An example of the latter is a mixed-use project where, for example, one or more dwelling units are part of a structure that also contains one or more commercial uses (e.g., retail, office). Multi-family dwellings include duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes (buildings under one ownership with two, three or four dwelling units, respectively, in the same structure); apartments (five or more units under one ownership in a single building); and townhouse development (three or more attached dwellings where no unit is located over another unit), and other building types containing multiple dwelling units (for example, courtyard housing, rowhouses, stacked flats). The Zoning Ordinance definition of multi-family housing does not include condominium units.

According to the Department of Finance, as of January 2022, multi-family housing units, plus condominium units, constituted approximately 21% of Seaside’s housing stock. The Zoning Ordinance provides for multi-family developments by-right in the RM and RH zones at 15 and 25 units per acre, respectively. The CMX zone allows 100% nonresidential uses but standalone multi-family residential uses are also allowed in this zone with a conditional use permit. This is not considered a constraint given the current and projected development trends - the City has only received applications for mixed-use projects in the past five years. Parker Flats, the Ascent, and Seaside Market are all mixed-use projects. The Ascent, a 105-unit project with 4,000 square feet of retail space, is located in the CMX zone. There is little interest in developing 100% nonresidential uses.

Single Room Occupancy Units
State law mandates local jurisdictions address the provision of housing options for extremely low income households, including Single Room Occupancy units (SRO). SRO units are one-room units intended for occupancy by a single individual. It is distinct from a studio or efficiency unit, in that a studio is a one-room unit that must contain a kitchen and bathroom. Although SRO units are not required to have a kitchen or bathroom, many SROs have one or the other.

Currently, the Zoning Ordinance does not expressly address SROs. The Zone Ordinance will be amended to facilitate and encourage the provision of SROs.

SROs will be conditionally permitted in the Commercial Mixed Use (CMX) zone. Criteria that would be used to review Use Permit (UP) applications for SROs pertain to performance standards and will not be specific to the proposed use. Potential conditions for approval of these facilities may include hours of operation, security, loading requirements, and management. Conditions would be similar to those for other similar uses in the same zones and would not serve to constrain the development of such facilities. The required findings for approval of a Use Permit are stated in Section 17.62.070 of the Zone Code (described later). The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update including the SRO provision will be undertaken after adoption of General Plan Packet Page 265
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-55
Update. The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update is expected to be adopted in December 2023 or soon after.

Condominium/Common-Interest Residential Subdivision
As defined by Civil Code Section 1715, a development where undivided interest in common in a portion of real property is coupled with a separate interest in space called a unit, the boundaries of which are described on a recorded final map or parcel map. Seaside allows Residential condominium and common-interest residential subdivision development in the three residential zones (RS, RM, and RH) with a use permit.

Mixed-Use
Mixed-use projects combine both commercial and residential uses, where the residential component is typically located above the commercial use. Mixed-use development is conditionally permitted in the CMX, CC, CRG, and CH zones. Mixed-use projects require approval of a Minor Use Permit by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission in the CMX district, whereas these developments require approval of a Use Permit by the Planning Commission in the CC, CH and CRG zones.

Residential Care Facilities
Residential care facilities include a single-dwelling or multi-unit facility licensed or supervised by a Federal, State, or local health/welfare agency, which provides 24-hour nonmedical care of unrelated persons who are disabled and in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual in a family-like environment.

State law requires that residential care facilities that serve six or fewer residents be considered a residential use and be subject to the same standards as similar residential uses in the same zone. Small residential care facilities of six or fewer are permitted by right in the RS, RM and RH zones and large residential care facilities (of more than six) are permitted via a Use Permit in the RS, RM, RH, and CC zones. In order to obtain a Use Permit the all of following must be found by the Planning Commission (Section 17.62.070 of the Zoning Ordinance):

1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Ordinance and the Municipal Code;

2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;

3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity are compatible with the existing and planned future land uses in the vicinity;

4. The site is physically suitable for the type, density and intensity of use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints; and

5. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone district in which the property is located.

The Commission can also impose reasonable conditions to ensure that the applicant will comply with all findings. The City’s housing plan includes a program to amend finding number five for licensed large residential care facilities, which may be considered subjective, to ensure it is not a constraint. As noted in the parking requirements discussion in Section 4, the existing parking requirements for residential care facilities in the Zoning Ordinance are stricter than what is required of other similar residential uses; therefore, the Housing Element includes a program to modify these requirements.

Packet Page 266
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-56
The City’s Zoning Ordinance is silent on residential care facilities/group homes that do not require state licensing and therefore does not regulate these uses that are not governed by State laws. The City will amend the Zoning Code to specify that residential care facilities/group homes that do not provide licensable services are permitted as regular residential uses, subject only to the generally applicable, nondiscriminatory health, safety, and zoning laws that apply to all single-family residences.

Accessory Dwelling Units
As defined by the Seaside Zoning Ordinance, an Accessory Dwelling Unit or ADU means an attached or detached residential dwelling unit located on a parcel with a proposed for existing primary residence that provides a complete, independent living facility containing separate kitchen, bath, sleeping, or living facilities.

The City adopted a comprehensive update of its ADU provisions in April 2022 and again in March 2023 to ensure compliance with changes to Government Code Sections §65852.2 and §65852.22.

ADUs are permitted on parcels with a proposed or existing residential use in any zone that allows residential uses. The Building Division of the Community Development Department issues a building permit for an ADU if all building permit submittal requirements are met, and if it conforms to the development standards contained in Section 17.52.230 of the Zoning Ordinance.

The City of Seaside actively promotes ADUs as a means of creating more affordable units in the community, allowing seniors to age-in-place, and providing homeowners with extra rental income. To that end, the City’s website contains a complete “ADU Guide” which lays out the step-by-step process for obtaining building permits through the City.18 The City Council also allocated 5 acre-feet of water to enable the construction of additional ADUs – to date more than 140 applications have been submitted under those rules
Additionally, the City contracted with an architectural firm to create Pre-Approved ADU Plans that have been reviewed and stamped by the City’s Chief Building Official. Residents may utilize these plans free of charge and only need to submit an accompanying specific site plan for review prior to approval.

Manufactured Housing
Pursuant to State law, manufactured housing placed on a permanent foundation is permitted in all residential zones. Such housing is subject to the same development standards, design review criteria, and processing as stick-built housing as set forth by the zoning district. Manufactured housing is included in the City’s definition of single-family dwellings and is permitted in all residential districts, as long as all development standards of section 17.52.170 are met. These include design, aesthetic and construction standards.

Emergency Shelters
Prior to February 2018, the City only conditionally permitted emergency shelters in limited residential zones as follows:
• Category 1 shelters are for families and/or single women with children in the RS-8 and RS12 zones. • Category 2 shelters are for single men and single women in the RM zone.

The Housing Element includes a program to amend the Zoning Ordinance to eliminate these categories so that shelters for any housing type are conditionally permitted in RS-8, R-12, and RM zones.

To expand opportunities for homeless shelters, in February 2018, the City amended the Zoning Ordinance to provide for the Category 3 shelters to permit emergency shelters by right without discretionary review in the Community Commercial (CC) zone, as well as within Census Tract 137.

Category 3 shelters have the following standards:
18 ADU Guide: https://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/740/ADU-Guide Packet Page 267
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-57
• Maximum beds per shelter: 50
• Separation requirement: 300 feet
• Parking: one space per staff member and four bicycle spaces The CC zone is located along the City’s major transportation corridor – Fremont Boulevard, which provides access to public transit and services. Mixed use residential development and live work housing are conditionally permitted in the CC zone. Census Tract 137 covers the area along Fremont Boulevard and Broadway Avenue, where the Monterey County Social Services is located.

Census Tract 137 covers CMX, CC, and RH properties. Based on the general guidance of new State law AB 2339, an average of 200 square feet of space is recommended per person. With an unsheltered population of 90 and maximum shelter limit of 50 beds, two shelters of up to 10,000 square feet each would be needed to accommodate the City’s unsheltered population. As of 2023, at least 1.9 acres of vacant and underutilized sites are available in the CC zone, adequate to accommodate the City’s unsheltered homeless population of 90 persons as of January 2022.

Within Census Tract 137, a range of underutilized commercial and residential properties offer potential for adaptive reuse or new construction of emergency shelters. In addition, there are no known hazard sites in CC sites. The Superfund National Priority Hazardous Waste Site only identified Fort Ord as a hazardous waste site within the City. As described in the Safety Element, the City cooperates with the federal government to obtain Superfund monies and implement Superfund clean-up activities. Clean-up of these sites is the responsibility of the federal government.

In May 2019, the Leadership Council of the Coalition of Homeless Service Providers voted to award $1.3 million to a partnership between nonprofits Community Human Services and Gathering for Women to refurbish the former County health clinic in Seaside with State funds through the Homeless Emergency Aid Program. The facility has the capacity of 30 to 50 women with children. This shelter is located in Census Tract 137 and is made possible also by the City’s new Category 3 shelter provisions.

In addition to more traditional emergency shelters, the recently passed AB 101 requires cities to allow a Low Barrier Navigation Center (LBNC) development by right in areas zoned for mixed uses and nonresidential zones permitting multi-family uses if it meets specified requirements. A “Low Barrier Navigation Center” is defined as “a Housing First, low-barrier, service-enriched shelter focused on moving people into permanent housing that provides temporary living facilities while case managers connect individuals experiencing homelessness to income, public benefits, health services, shelter, and housing.” Low Barrier Navigation Centers may include options such as allowing pets, permitting partners to share living space, and providing storage for residents’ possessions. The Zoning Ordinance will be amended to comply with AB 101.

Transitional Housing
State law (SB 2) requires local jurisdictions to specifically address the provisions for transitional housing. California Government Code defines “transitional housing” as “buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future point in time that shall be no less than six months from the beginning of assistance” (California Government Code Section 65582(h)).

Pursuant to SB 2, transitional housing constitutes a residential use and therefore local governments cannot treat it differently from other types of residential uses (e.g., requiring a use permit when other residential uses of similar function do not require a use permit). As part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update, the City will amend the Ordinance to define transitional housing pursuant to California Government Code Section 65582(h) and to permit transitional housing in all zones where residential uses are permitted, subject to the same development standards and permitting processes as the same type of housing in the same zone and in compliance with the occupancy limitations of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

Packet Page 268
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-58
Supportive Housing
State law (SB 2) also requires local jurisdictions to address the provisions for supportive housing.

California Government Code (Section 65582) defines “supportive housing” as “housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to an onsite or offsite service that assists the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community.” The target population, according to the Government Code Section, means “persons with low incomes who have one or more disabilities, including mental illness, HIV or AIDS, substance abuse, or other chronic health condition, or individuals eligible for services provided pursuant to the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Act (Division 4.5, commencing with Section 4500, of the Welfare and Institutions Code) and may include, among other populations, adults, emancipated minors, families with children, elderly persons, young adults aging out of the foster care system, individuals existing from institutional settings, veterans, and homeless people.”
Pursuant to SB 2, supportive housing constitutes a residential use and therefore local governments cannot treat it differently from other types of residential uses (e.g., requiring a use permit when other residential uses of similar function do not require a use permit). As part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update, the City will amend the ordinance to define supportive housing pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65582(f) and (g), and to permit supportive housing in all zones where residential uses are permitted, subject to the same development standards and permitting processes as the same type of housing in the same zone.

The recently passed AB 2162 further requires supportive housing projects of 50 units or fewer to be permitted by right in zones where multi-family and mixed-use developments are permitted, when the development meets certain conditions. The bill also prohibits minimum parking requirements for supportive housing within ½ mile of a public transit stop. This Housing Element includes a program to amend the Zoning Ordinance to comply with AB 2162.

Farmworker and Employee Housing
The California Employee Housing Act requires that housing for six or fewer employees be treated as a regular residential use. The Employee Housing Act further defines housing for agricultural workers consisting of 36 beds or 12 units be treated as an agricultural use and permitted where agricultural uses are permitted.

The City of Seaside Zoning Ordinance does not include any provisions for farmworker or employee housing. The City has no agricultural zoning and is therefore not required to specifically provide for farmworker housing. However, the City is still subject to the employee housing requirements of the Employee Housing Act. As part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update, the City will include provisions for housing for six or fewer employees.

9. Housing for Persons with Disabilities
Housing options for persons with disabilities are often limited. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) came into effect in 1990. Multi-family housing built prior to 1990 does not typically include accessible units on the ground floor. Few rental housing units in Seaside are accessible and ADA does not cover single-family homes. Rehabilitation to accommodate the accessibility needs of disabled residents is needed, particularly to the older housing stock. Therefore, it is important that City’s codes, policies and regulations are free of undue constraints to encourage rehabilitation of the existing housing stock and to comply with ADA requirements.

Land Use Controls
Small family homes, foster family homes, and adult day care, and adult residential facilities providing care to six or fewer adults are permitted by right in the RS, RM, and RH zones.

Residential care facilities for seven or more people and adult day cares are also permitted with a Use Permit in the RS, RM, RH, and CC zones. The City has not adopted any spacing or concentration requirements for residential care facilities.

Packet Page 269
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-59
According to the State Department of Social Services, as of October 2022, several licensed residential care facilities are located in Seaside:
• Adult Residential Care: One facility totaling 22 beds • Residential Care for the Elderly: Three facilities with 61 beds This Housing Element update includes a program to amend the Zoning Ordinance to address provisions for emergency shelters, transitional housing, supportive housing, and SRO units. The City will not adopt a spacing or concentration requirement for these facilities. These amendments will expand housing opportunities for persons with disabilities.

Approval Procedures
Small residential care facilities are permitted by right in residential zones and large residential care facilities are permitted via a Use Permit in the RS, RM, RH, and CC zones. For approval of Use Permit, the Planning Commission must determine that the development standards of the building are suitable to the zone and that the use is not detrimental to the community, as discussed above. The procedures do not apply to the status as “disabled” housing and apply to similar housing that is not intended for persons with disabilities. Approval procedures for small residential care facilities are no different from traditional residential uses, such as single- or multi-family. As part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, provisions for transitional and supportive housing will be amended to reflect approval through the same processes as other similar housing types in the same zone.

Definition of Family
Local governments sometimes restrict access to housing for households failing to qualify as “family” by the definition specified in a city’s Zoning Ordinance. Specifically, a restrictive definition of “family” that limits the number of and differentiates between related and unrelated individuals living together may illegally limit the development and siting of group homes for persons with disabilities but not for housing families that are similarly sized or situated.19 Seaside’s Zoning Ordinance does not define family and, hence, does not restrict access.

Reasonable Accommodations (RA) Procedure
Both the Federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act direct local governments to make reasonable accommodations (i.e., modifications or exceptions) in their zoning laws and other land use regulations when such accommodations may be necessary to afford disabled persons an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. For example, it may be a reasonable accommodation to waive a setback requirement so that a paved path of travel can be provided to residents who have mobility impairments. Another example would be to waive the maximum lot coverage requirement to allow a disabled person to create a bedroom on the ground floor.

The City of Seaside currently includes a reasonable accommodation for disabled persons as a cause for a Minor Use Permit (17.62.070.g and 17.62.080.f.3). The procedure requires applications to include the current use of the property in question, a description of the accommodation required and the basis for the claim that the applicant is considered disabled, a detailed explanation of why the accommodation is reasonable and necessary to afford the applicant an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling in the City. 19 California courts (City of Santa Barbara v. Adamson, 1980 and City of Chula Vista v. Pagard, 1981, etc.) have ruled an ordinance as invalid if it defines a “family” as (a) an individual; (b) two or more persons related by blood, marriage, or adoption; or (c) a group of not more than a specific number of unrelated persons as a single housekeeping unit. These cases have explained that defining a family in a manner that distinguishes between blood-related and non-blood related individuals does not serve any legitimate or useful objective or purpose recognized under the zoning and land use planning powers of a municipality and therefore violated rights of privacy under the California Constitution.

Packet Page 270
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-60
The City of Seaside currently processes requests for reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities persons via a Minor Use Permit. The review authority may approve or deny an application for Minor Use Permit approval for a modification to development standards for a residential project after first making the following findings:
• An individual protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act has a special need that would only be served by the requested modification to development standards for the proposed project;
• The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed modification are compatible with the existing and planned future land uses in the vicinity; and • Alternative accommodations which may provide an equivalent level of benefit but would not require modifications to the development standards of the Zoning Ordinance, are infeasible for the proposed project.

These findings are typical to ensure that the RA requests are consistent with the need and General Plan and zoning requirements.

This procedure of requiring a Minor Use Permit is considered potentially constraining to housing for persons with disabilities, since the public hearing process before the Zoning Administrator means added time and costs for the disabled applicants. As part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update, the City will amend the reasonable accommodation procedure to provide flexibility in the application of planning and development regulations for residents with disabilities via an administrative procedure.

Building Codes
The City adopted the 2022 California Building Code and enforces Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations that regulates the access and adaptability of buildings to accommodate persons with disabilities. Government Code §12955.1 requires that 10% of the total dwelling units in multifamily buildings without elevators consisting of three or more rental units or four or more condominium units are subject to the following building standards for persons with disabilities:
• The primary entry to the dwelling unit shall be on an accessible route unless exempted by site impracticality tests.
• At least one powder room or bathroom shall be located on the primary entry level served by an accessible route.
• All rooms or spaces located on the primary entry level shall be served by an accessible route. Rooms and spaces located on the primary entry level and subject to this chapter may include but are not limited to kitchens, powder rooms, bathrooms, living rooms, bedrooms, or hallways.
• Common use areas shall be accessible.
• If common tenant parking is provided, accessible parking spaces are required.

No unique Building Code restrictions are in place that would constrain the development of housing for persons with disabilities. Compliance with provisions of the City’s Municipal Code, California Code of Regulations, California Building Standards Code, and federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is assessed and enforced by the Building and Safety Department as a part of the building permit submittal.

Conclusion
The Zoning Ordinance will be updated comprehensively 2024 following adoption of the new General Plan. The Zoning Ordinance update will address emergency shelters, transitional housing and supportive housing. The City will also amend the Zoning Ordinance to process reasonable accommodation requests via an administrative procedure. With these revisions, no policy or regulation of the City of Seaside serves to constrain housing for persons with disabilities.

Packet Page 271
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-61

10. Development Permit Procedures and Processing Times
The evaluation and review process required by local jurisdictions often contributes to the cost of housing in that holding costs incurred by developers are ultimately manifested in the unit’s selling price. Seaside’s development approval process is designed to further housing development. Together, the following figures and Table App-36 and Table App-37 show the type of approvals required for the most common types of residential development as well as the reviewing bodies.

Single-family detached units, both market rate and affordable, are permitted by right in residential zones and require an architectural review only if the buildings are taller than 18 feet or meet any of the requirements listed in the discussion of the architectural review process below.

Single-family attached housing requires a Use Permit, however, and affordable single-family attached housing is not permitted in the RH zone. The City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to prohibit single-family homes (detached or attached; market-rate or affordable) in RH zone as part of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance. Prohibiting single-family homes in RH zone helps preserve the development capacity designated for multi-family housing.

Figure App-7: Permitting Process for Single-Family Detached Housing *35- to 45-day processing time for those not requiring architectural review. For those that do, probably closer to 2-3 months.

Single- Family Residence
(Detached &
Detached-Affordable Restricted)
35-45 days processing time*
Single Story
on Standard Lot
Building Permit Review
and Approval
Single Story on
Substandard Lot, or
Over 18 ft. in Height
Subject to
Architectural Review by PC
Building Permit Review
and Approval
Packet Page 272
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-62
Figure App-8: Permitting Process for Single-Family Attached Housing Small multi-family housing, of two or three units, is permitted by right in the RM and RH zones with architectural review depending on the specifications of the project. Large multi-family development of four or more units requires the same approvals but is only permitted in the RH zone.

Figure App-9: Permitting Process for Multi-Family Housing 35- to 45-day processing time for those not requiring architectural review. For those that do, probably closer to 2 to 3 months.

The permitting processes shown in Figure App-7, Figure App-8, and Figure App-9 are dependent on the zone the housing is located in, especially in the case of multi-family housing. The City complies with the Streamlining Act to provide review of development applications.

Single- Family Residence
(Attached &
Attached-Affordable Restricted)
45-90 days processing time
Subject to
Use Permit Review
Subject to
Architechtural Review by PC
Building Permit Review
and Approval
Multi-family Residential
(two or more units)
45-90 days processing time
Subject to
Architectural Review by PC
Building Permit Review
and Approval
Packet Page 273
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-63
Table App-36: Approval Required
Housing Type RS RM RH
Single-Family,
Detached
• Permitted by right
• Architectural review required on all new construction, additions to existing structures that result in a height of greater than 18 feet, and all new second-story elements including decks, roofs, projections, etc., on a substandard lot or includes public financing.

Single-Family,
Detached
(affordable)
• Permitted by right
• Architectural review required on all new construction, additions to existing structures that result in a height of greater than 18 feet, all new second-story elements including decks, roofs, projections, etc., on a substandard lot or includes public financing.

Single-Family,
Attached
• Use Permit is required
• Architectural review required on all new construction, additions to existing structures that result in a height of greater than 18 feet, and all new second-story elements including decks, roofs, projections, etc., on a substandard lot, or includes public financing.

Single-Family,
Attached
(affordable)
• Use Permit is required
• Architectural review required on all new construction, additions to existing structures that result in a height of greater than 18 feet, and all new second-story elements including decks, roofs, projections, etc., on a substandard lot or includes public financing.
• Not permitted
•
Multi-family, 2 or 3
units • Not permitted
• Permitted by right.
• Architectural review is required on all new construction and additions of 50% or greater to existing structures.

Multi-family, 4+
units • Not permitted
• Permitted by right.
• Architectural review is required on all
new construction and additions of 50%
or greater to existing structures.

Source: City of Seaside Zoning Ordinance, 2022.

The Planning Department has established a time table for processing applications consistent with California’s Permit Streamlining Act.

Table App-37: Permit Process
Permit Type Approval Body Appeal Body Public Hearing
Estimated
Processing Time
Use Permit PC CC Yes 60-90 days
Minor Use Permit ZA PC/CC Yes 60 days
Variance PC CC Yes 60-90 days
Minor Variance ZA PC/CC Yes 60 days
Architectural Review PC CC Yes 60-90 days
Planned Development PC CC Yes 60-90 days
CC = City Council
PC = Planning Commission
ZA = Zoning Administrator
As shown in Table App-37, all permit types, including Use Permits, Minor Use Permits, Variances, Design review include a public hearing posing a potential constraint on development. However, as part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update, the City will establish objective design standards which will move many projects to a ministerial approval process and will no longer require public hearings.

For projects exempt from CEQA, a typical single-family development can be processed between 45 and 60 days when an application is deemed complete. A typical multi-family project can be processed within 60 days from the date the application is deemed complete. Review is limited to architectural and site design standards. The City works to expedite project review and approval.

Packet Page 274
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-64
Furthermore, to comply with SB 35 (Affordable Housing Streamlined Approval), the City will establish a ministerial review process for qualifying multi-family residential projects.

Use Permits
The Seaside Zoning Ordinance specifies that the purpose of a use permit is to ensure the proper integration of uses which, because of their special nature, may be suitable only in certain locations; and provided such uses are arranged or operated in a particular manner.

The Use Permit and Minor Use Permit are for the discretionary review of uses and activities that may be appropriate in an applicable zone, but whose effects on a site and surroundings cannot be determined before being proposed for a specific site. Minor Use Permit approval may be considered only for a project that is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Use Permit is reviewed by the Planning Commission, whereas a Minor Use Permit is reviewed by the Zoning Administrator. Findings and decisions are based on the following criteria (Zoning Ordinance Section 17.62.070):
• The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and the Municipal Code; • The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; • The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity are compatible with the existing and planned future land uses in the vicinity; • The site is physically suitable for the type, density and intensity of use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints; and • Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone district in which the property is located.

A Use Permit is typically processed within 2 to 3 months for approval by the Planning Commission and ten weeks if City Council approval is also requested on appeal. For the Minor Use Permit, a public hearing before the Zoning Administrator is required. A Minor Use Permit likely would take around 8 weeks. However, these processing times do not add substantial time or cost to the processing of a project and are not considered a constraint to development.

Findings of approval related to public interest and convenience impact approval certainty and can extend project timing and add to the cost of projects. While currently use permit process may be a constraint to development, as part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update, the City will establish objective design standards for residential development. Projects that meet standards will be approved ministerially.

Variances
Variance and Minor Variances allow alterations of development standards as they apply to particular uses when practical difficulties and unique physical hardships on the property unduly prevent the proposed development from occurring if the strict interpretation and enforcement of zoning codes is applied. A variance may be granted, or variances may be required in particular cases for building setbacks, height, bulk and density, parking, landscaping, walls and fencing and business operation. Variances may not be granted for land uses, residential density, specific prohibitions (such as prohibited signs and procedural requirements), or other economic considerations.

A Variance is reviewed by the Planning Commission and a Minor Variance is reviewed by the Zoning Administrator. A Minor Variance provides relief from the Zoning Ordinance for the following requirements up to a maximum reduction of 10%:

Packet Page 275
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-65
• Distance between structures;
• Parcel dimensions (not area);
• Setbacks;
• Structure height; or
• On-site parking, loading, and landscaping.

A public hearing is required for a Variance and a Minor Variance. A Variance can take approximately two to three months to process while a Minor Variance usually takes about 8 weeks. Findings and decisions are based on:
• There are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, so that the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and within the same zone;
• The approval of the Variance or Minor Variance includes conditions of approval as necessary to ensure that the adjustment granted does not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and within the same zone; and
• The Variance or Minor Variance is consistent with the General Plan, and any applicable specific plan.

Architectural Review
Architectural review is intended to improve the aesthetic appearance of open spaces and structures, especially those visible from the public rights-of-way, and to establish design standards and policies promoting and enhancing good design. Architectural review is required for the following residential projects:
• Nonresidential, multi-family residential, and mixed-use projects: all new construction and additions of 50% or greater to existing structures
• Single-family residential projects: all new construction, additions to existing structures that result in a height of greater than 18 feet, and all new second-story elements including decks, roofs, projections, etc.
• Landscape and irrigation plans for new construction of multi-family residential, commercial, and other nonresidential development
• Residential subdivisions resulting in two or more dwellings Historically, architectural review has been conducted by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR).

In 2020, the BAR was eliminated and merged with the Planning Commission. Per Ord. 1094, “The Planning Commission will also act as the Board of Architectural Review, as it pertains to all references in Chapter 17.70.070 of the Seaside Municipal Code.” References to the BAR below refer to the Planning Commission acting as the BAR. The PC considers all aspects of architecture, landscape and lighting and may impose conditions of approval. The process ensures that the architectural review is focused on the aesthetics of the project. Specifically, the Zoning Ordinance identifies three aspects of review:
• Architectural considerations
• Landscape considerations
• Light considerations
In making its decisions, the PC can impose conditions it deems reasonable and necessary to protect the best interests of the surrounding areas, as well as to further the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The PC can adopt, by resolution, subject to ratification by the Planning Commission, measures to streamline the review and approval of minor changes.

The City of Seaside provides the Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines on its website. The purpose of the document is to assist staff, the public and decision-makers through the architectural review process by clearly defining the City’s expectations for design quality, use of materials and architectural imagery. These Design Guidelines are also used by the PC in the case of formal architectural review as their guidelines for approving a single-family project. The guidelines are designed to reinforce policies set out in the General Plan including improving the Packet Page 276
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-66
physical appearance of residential neighborhoods and protecting the character of single-family neighborhoods by restricting out-of-scale buildings, incompatible uses and designs, blocked views and/or access to sunlight and excessive through traffic. The Design Guidelines are summarized below:

1. Site Planning
a. Front Yard Coverage, Landscape and Hardscape
• Enhance neighborhood character by enhancing the minimized paved surfaces in front yards and maintain landscaped areas.
• Encourage drought-tolerant and low water usage plants artfully installed. b. Garage Placement
• Street frontages dominated by front-loaded garages are detrimental to the sense of a people-friendly and pedestrian-oriented neighborhood. • Side-accessed, alley-accessed and detached rear garages are encouraged to diminish the visual impact of the garage along street frontages. c. Driveways
• Provide adequate space between driveways (at least 18 inches) and minimize visual impact.
• One curb cut per residential lot and encourage the use of alternative materials. d. Walls, Fences and Screening
• Walls and fences should be designed in such a manner as to create an attractive appearance to the street and to compliment the style and character of the homes and the neighborhood.
• Solid walls over 36 inches in height are strongly discouraged.

2. Mass and Scale
• Physical size and mass of building should be proportional to lot size. • Overall design should be compatible with scale and mass of surrounding properties.
• Architectural elements should be designed to eliminate box-like appearances. • Scale and mass of new infill development should be reduced by stepping down building height toward street and adjacent smaller structures. a. Building Heights and Second Story Decks
• Entries and massing of stories should be proportion to building façade. b. Second Story Setbacks
• The second story setback should average five feet more than the first floor setback

3. Architectural Features – designed to encourage high quality design to enhance the character of residential neighborhoods.
a. General – so specific style is required but the focus is on compatibility with surrounding homes and styles.
• Building should be consistently one style rather than a mix of styles. b. Front Porches and Entries
• Front porches, back porches and/or decks that permit casual observation of alleys and streets, are encouraged.
c. Roof Articulation
• The use of traditional roof forms such as gables, hips and dormers are encouraged.
• Avoid box-like appearance through variation in the roofline and building elevations.
d. Materials
• Consistent and harmonious use of high quality, durable materials is encouraged. • Piecemeal embellishment and frequent changes in material is discouraged.

While the architectural review is required for all new construction, it has not been a constraint to development. The architectural review is focused on design and not development standards.

Packet Page 277
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-67
The City does not have specific multi-family design guidelines and generally applies the singlefamily design guidelines to multi-family development. These guidelines encourage the use of design, materials, or placement that are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. They do not necessarily result in increases in construction costs. Since the guidelines are only generally applied to multi-family development, they do not constrain the development of affordable housing. However, pursuant SB 330, the City will adopt objective design standards. An “objective design standard” is “a design standard that involve[s] no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and is uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official before submittal of an application.” (Government Code section 66300(a)(7).The City will develop design guidelines to provide objective review criteria for site planning, mass and scale, and architectural features. The draft EIR for the General Plan was released October 2023 and adoption of the General Plan is expected mid-2024.

Planned Development Permit
A Planned Development permit is intended to provide for flexibility in the application of Zoning Ordinance standards to proposed developments under limited and unique circumstances. A Planned Development permit allows for innovation in site planning and other aspects of project design. The City expects each planned development project to be of obvious, significantly higher quality than would be achieved through conventional design practices and standards. Planned Development permits are only accepted for sites larger than one acre, and the project must also be approved before the grading or building permits are issued.

A Planned Development must meet certain standards:
• Infrastructure Requirements: Proposal shall not be approved unless adequate sewer and water lines and streets already service the site, or the developer proposes to install the facilities at the developer's expense.
• Street Design: The street system in a Planned Development shall conform to the existing topography rather than cut through it, to minimize cut-and-fill grading activities. A planned development of five or more acres shall be designed and constructed with direct access to at least one major thoroughfare.
• Preservation of Community Assets and Landmarks: Historic places, groves, scenic points, trees, waterways, and other community assets and landmarks within the project site shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible.
• Open Space: A residential Planned Development project of 3 acres or more shall be designed to either provide a minimum of 10% of the total area in one centrally located usable open space area, or dedicate 10% of the total area of the site to the City. • Screening Buffer: A Planned Development project proposed to be of higher density or different character than an existing abutting single-family residential neighborhood shall be designed and constructed to provide an appropriate screening buffer between the proposed development and the abutting residential neighborhood.

The timeframe for processing a Planned Development varies depending on the complexity and level of CEQA review required.

11. Planning and Development Fees
Planning Fees
Housing construction imposes certain short- and long-term costs upon local government, such as the cost of providing planning services and inspections. In addition, long-term costs related to the maintenance and improvement of the community’s infrastructure, facilities, parks, and streets are also imposed. Proposition 13 has severely constrained the amount of property tax revenue that a city in California receives. As a result, Seaside charges various planning and Packet Page 278
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-68
development fees to recoup costs and ensure that essential services and infrastructure are available when needed. Seaside is sensitive to the issue that excessive fees may hinder development and strives to encourage responsible and affordable development. In 2022, the City Council adopted a new fee schedule, which reflects minor upward adjustments for most fees except for conditional use permits, minor use permits, and design/architectural reviews from the 2018 fee schedule. Planning fees for the City of Seaside and neighboring jurisdictions are summarized in Table App-38. As shown, fees charged by Seaside for FY 2022-2023 are generally lower than comparable sized communities such as Monterey and Santa Cruz.

Table App-38: Comparison of Planning Fees
Seaside Carmel Marina1 Monterey Pacific Grove Santa Cruz Single-Family Residence
Conditional Use Permit $800 $2,620 $5,350 n/a $4,000
deposit
$1,991 $2,598
Minor Use Permit $700 N/A n/a $2,278.50 $1,287 n/a
Design/Architectural
Review
$1,200 $430 to $780
(Track 1, minormajor) or $2,265-
$5,175 (Track 2,
minor-major)
$340 to 7,775 $1,236.50 $3,318 $349 +

3.49 per
$1000
valuation
Variance $3,034 $2,145 $4,745 $1,804 $2,771 $3,240
Minor Variance $3,034 n/a n/a $964 n/a n/a
Multi-family Residential
Conditional Use Permit $1,000 $2,620 $1,690 $4,000 deposit $3,248 $1,678 Minor Use Permit $700 N/A n/a $2,278.50 $1,287 n/a
Design/Architectural
Review
$1,200 $430 to $780
(Track 1, minormajor) or $2,265-
$5,175 (Track 2,
minor-major)
$340 to 7,775 $1,236.50 $3,318 $349 +

3.49 per
$1000
valuation
Variance $4,505 $2,145 $4,745 $1,804 $2,771 $3,240
Minor Variance $3,034 n/a n/a $964 n/a n/a
Planned Unit
Developments
$8,825 n/a n/a n/a n/a $8,711
Tentative Map
(up to 4 lots)
$5,889 $4,000 $3,845 $6,000
deposit*
Min $2495
(+$302 per
lot)
$8,918
Tentative Map
(4 or more lots)
$8,714 $4,000 $7924 (5-20
lots) add.
charges
$6,000
deposit*
Min $2495
(+$302 per
lot)
$17,903
Lot Line Adjustment $1,724 $520 $2,870 $4,056 $2,058 $1,188 Source: City of Seaside, Master Fee Schedule effective September 15, 2022. City of Carmel, Master Fee Schedule effective July 3, 2022; City of Marina, Fee Schedule as of July 15, 2018); City of Monterey, Master Fee Schedule, Fiscal Year 2023; City of Pacific Grove, Master Fee Schedule Fiscal Year 2022; City of Santa Cruz Master Fee Schedule Effective July 1, 2022. [there’s an asterisk and a footnote in the table that are not explained in the notes] Development Fees
As of this writing, the City of Seaside does not charge any development impact fees on new residential development. While the school district, the water management district, the regional sewage collection and treatment agency, and the regional transportation agency charge fees for new development, the City has no discretionary review authority over these fees or these agencies. Table App-39 summarizes the development fees charged by other agencies. As shown, reduced water and sewer fees are available for affordable housing units.

Packet Page 279
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-69
The Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) has established a Regional Development Impact Fee (RDIF) program in Monterey County, helping to streamline the process for analyzing and mitigating transportation impacts. The Regional Fee program has been approved by the requisite number of city councils and the County Board of Supervisors and went into effect August 27, 2008. The fee revenues collected through RDIF compensate for future developments’ impact on Monterey County roadways and to program regionally significant capital improvements. In 2018, TAMC conducted a Regional Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update which analyzed fees based on the following benefit zones in Monterey County: North County, Greater Salinas, Peninsula/South Coast, and South County. For residential development in the City of Seaside, as part of “Zone 3: Peninsula/South Coast,” these fees average $3,528 per unit, with lower multi-family fees per unit compared to single-family development.20 New development within the jurisdiction of the Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) (which includes lands located in the cities of Seaside and Marina, and unincorporated Monterey County) is assessed impact fees established and collected by the Reuse Authority.

Although the cost of impact fees may constrain residential development, these fees are necessary for public entities to recoup the cost of service delivery and these fees are imposed by other agencies not within the City’s control. Furthermore, other jurisdictions served by these agencies are also charged comparable fees.

Table App-39: Planning and Development Fees Collected by Other Agencies Single-Family Project1
Multi-family
Project2 Affordable Project3
Water Monterey Peninsula Water
Management District
(MPWMD)
$6,194
($210 + $273/fixture unit)
$108,318
($210 + $273/fixture
unit)
$1,166
($210 + $137/fixture
unit)
California American Water
Company (Cal-Am)
$5,000 Actual cost $3,000
Marina Coast Water District
(MCWD)
$4,526 $81,468 $4,526
Sewer Monterey Regional Water
Pollution Control Agency
(MRWPCA)
$3,506 $63,099 $1,800
Seaside County Sanitation
District (SCSD)
$1,753 $31,554 $900
Marina Coast Water District
(MCWD)
$2,333 $41,994 $1,000
School Monterey Peninsula Unified
School District (MPUSD)
$8,160 ($4.08/sq. ft.) $4, 896 ($4.08/sq. ft.) $6,720
($3.36/sq. ft.)
Transportation Transportation Agency for
Monterey County (TAMC)4
$4,484.75 $56,685.03 $2,746.15
Housing FORA $23,279 $23,279 $23,279
Assumptions:

1. Single-family development based on 2,000 square feet

2. Multi-family development based on 1,200 square feet at 18 units

3. Affordable unit project is assumed to be multi-family low income

4. Affordable cost per edu, 400 square feet garage per unit is used for Building Permit Fees Estimation; to meet Affordable Standards for sewer, units must have maximum 7 fixture units (1 bathroom, no dishwasher or clothes washer). Traditional residential has 22 fixture units (2 bathrooms, dishwasher, clothes washer)

5. TAMC fees (http://www.tamcmonterey.org/programs/dev-impact-fees/) shown are for single-family unit, for 18 apartment units, and for a moderate-income condominium unit using the Regional Fee implementation worksheet (excel) 20 Final 2018 TAMC RDIF Nexus Study Update.
https://www.tamcmonterey.org/files/40892d42f/Final_2018_TAMC_RDIF_Nexus_Study_Update_10182018.pdf Packet Page 280
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-70
Conclusion
For a typical single-family home (1,000 square feet home and 200 square feet garage), the total fees are estimated at $23,433 as follow:
• Plan Check Fees: $5,334.15
• Permit Fees: $6,820.32
• Impact Fees (collected by outside agencies): $11,278.56 For a typical multi-family housing project (six units at ground level and 12 carports), the total fees are estimated at $79,751.09 (or $11,791.85 per unit) as follow:
• Plan Check Fees: $5,872.45
• Permit Fees: $8,414.08
• Impact Fees (collected by outside agencies): $56,464.56 Fees for a single-family residence or for a multi-family unit constitute no more than 10% of the building valuation (excluding land cost). In Seaside and neighboring cities, fees for single-family units are higher than those for multi-family units. Seaside’s total fee estimates per single-family unit ($23,433) are lower than those reported in Marina ($30,000) and Pacific Grove ($69,000).

Despite the seemingly high fees in Pacific Grove, the City of Pacific Grove reported that their fees for single-family units account for less than 10 percent of the total construction costs, similar to Seaside rates. Marina and Del Rey Oaks also reported that the total fees s accounted for less than 10 percent of total construction costs.

Table App-40: Total Fees per Unit= Neighboring Juristictions City Multi-Family Single-Family
Seaside $11,791 (<10%†)) $23,433 (<10%†)
Marina $14,000-$24,000 $30,000 (~10%†)
Pacific Grove 21,235 (3%†) $68,928 (7%†)
Del Rey Oaks <10%† <10%†
Monterey City Did not provide total fee estimate Did not provide total fee estimate Sand City Did not provide total fee estimate Did not provide total fee estimate † % of total construction costs
Note: Amounts refer to per unit cost.

Source: Seaside 2023-2031 Draft Housing Element Technical Appendix (July 2023); Pacific Grove 2023-2031 Draft Housing Element Update (September 2023); Del Rey Oaks 2023-2031 Draft Housing Element (May 2023); City of Monterey 2023-2031 Draft Housing Element Appendix C (September 2023), Sand City 2023-2031 Draft Housing Element (May 2023)
Overall planning and processing fees charged by the City and impact fees charged by other public/quasi-public agencies amount may serve to constrain affordable housing development.

Therefore, the City offers incentives such as financial assistance, regulatory concessions, and technical assistance to help facilitate affordable housing development in the community. The City’s Housing Plan includes a program to perform a comprehensive review fees during planning period and make amendments as necessary.

12. On- and Off-Site Improvements
Another factor adding to the cost of new construction is the provision of adequate infrastructure to support municipal services for new residential development. In many cases, these improvements are dedicated to the City, which is then responsible for their maintenance. The cost of these facilities is borne by developers, added to the cost of new housing units, and eventually passed in various degrees to the homebuyer or property owner. Because areas where new development and redevelopment will occur are largely developed with infrastructure in place, the City does not assess major infrastructure buy-in fees.

Packet Page 281
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-71
On- and off-site infrastructure improvements/requirements are assessed based on the merits of each project during discretionary project review, and for larger projects may be determined through the environmental review process. Typically, the following are required for new construction and new subdivisions:
• Install city standard sidewalk, curb and gutter.
• Install reclaimed water system for landscaping irrigation. • Install storm water retention system for all impervious surfaces.

Fees associated would be billed as actual time spent by staff.

For new homes within existing neighborhood, the following are typically required:
• Install storm water retention system.
• Repair sidewalk, curb and gutter if damaged or unsafe. If repair is necessary, the applicable fee for curb/gutter or sidewalk encroachment permit would apply.

13. Building Codes and Enforcement
Building and safety codes, while adopted to preserve public health and safety ensure the construction of safe and decent housing, have the potential to increase construction costs and impact the affordability of housing. These include the following building codes, accessibility standards, and other related ordinances.

California Building Code
Seaside has adopted the California Building Code (CBC), which includes the International Building Code. No local amendments have been made to the CBC. Enforcement of applicable building codes requires inspections at various stages of construction to ensure code compliance. The California Building Code prescribes minimum insulation requirements to reduce noise and promote energy efficiency.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
The City’s building code requires new residential construction to comply with ADA requirements.

State law requires buildings consisting of three or more units to incorporate design features, including: 1) adaptive design features for the interior of the unit; 2) accessible public and common use portions; and 3) sufficiently wider doors to allow wheelchair access. These codes apply to all jurisdictions and are enforced by federal and state agencies.

The City of Seaside currently processes requests for Reasonable Accommodation (RA) for persons with disabilities persons via a Minor Use Permit. This procedure is considered potentially constraining to housing for persons with disabilities as the public hearing process before the Zoning Administrator adds time and costs to applicants with disabilities. This Housing Element includes a program for the City to amend the reasonable accommodation procedure to provide flexibility in the planning application and development regulations for residents with disabilities via an administrative procedure.

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
As the permit holder of a Municipal Storm Water Permit, the City must implement an Urban Runoff Management Program to reduce the discharge of pollutants into the storm sewer system.

Prior to issuance of a building permit or any discretionary land use approval or permit, the applicant must submit a storm water mitigation plan and implement Best Management Practices in accordance with state and local regulations.

Code Enforcement
The City’s compliance/inspection staff is responsible for enforcing local and state property maintenance codes. Building inspections are made daily and are typically available the day Packet Page 282
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-72
following request by the contractor. Additional fees to cover inspection costs are charged to the requesting party. Inspections of unsafe buildings are made on a complaint or referral basis.

C. Environmental/Infrastructure Constraints
Overcoming environmental and infrastructure constraints can add significantly to the cost of developing housing. In Seaside, the primary environmental constraints are lack of an adequate water supply, inadequate water, sewer, and storm drainage collector lines in some areas, inadequate road widths in other areas, environmental hazards located on the former Fort Ord, and significant biological resources located in the eastern portion of the community and protected by the Habitat Management Plan (HMP). The citywide environmental constraints are described below. The sites identified for potential near-term development are all located within Seaside Proper or in approved specific plans. There are no known environmental constraints that cannot be mitigated.

1. Protected Habitat
Federal and State regulations require environmental review of proposed discretionary projects (e.g., subdivision maps, use permits). Costs, resulting from fees charged by local government and private consultants needed to complete the environmental analyses and from delays caused by mandated public review period, also add to the cost of housing. However, the presence of these regulations helps preserve the environment and ensure environmental quality for Seaside residents.

2. Tree Ordinance
The Tree Ordinance prohibits the removal of any tree on private property in the City without a permit. The ordinance also contains a list of trees which may not be planted without a permit (including Coast Redwood, Blue Gum Eucalyptus, Willows, Cottonwood, and Poplar).

3. Hazardous and Toxic Sites
Large portions of the former Fort Ord base contain hazardous and toxic waste sites, as well as unexploded ordnance. These areas of Seaside are identified as a Superfund National Priority Hazardous Waste Site. No housing is currently proposed in these areas. As described in the Safety Element, the City cooperates with the federal government to obtain Superfund monies and implement Superfund clean-up activities. Clean-up of these sites is the responsibility of the federal government.

4. Infrastructure
Development on existing undeveloped land or redeveloped to higher residential densities would not require the provision of new infrastructure systems, but the development may create a need for upgrades to existing storm drain lines, water lines, sewer lines, streets, and other infrastructure. These upgrades will add to development costs, which could reduce the construction feasibility of units affordable to lower income households without subsidy. The upgrade of the local water distribution and other infrastructure serving Seaside is ongoing as part of the City’s Capital Improvements Program (CIP).

5. Water Supply
The Monterey Peninsula has long faced water supply challenges which have hindered new residential development opportunities. Challenges facing the Peninsula include the lack of permanent diversion rights from the Carmel River, with a cease-and-desist order (amended in July 2016) requiring termination of illegal diversions by the end of 2021, and pumping reduction requirements of the Seaside Basin Adjudication.

Packet Page 283
City of Seaside Technical Appendix
2023-2031 Housing Element APP-73
The City of Seaside receives its primary potable water supply from the Seaside Basin, the Carmel River, and Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin. Historic use of the region’s groundwater resources has exceeded safe yield and resulted in lowering of water levels and in saltwater intrusion.

Constrained water supply will continue to be a significant factor in growth locally and regionally.

The Seaside Municipal Water System, California-American Water Company (Cal-Am), and the Marina Coast Water District (MCWD) provide water services to the City. The Seaside Municipal System is operated and maintained by the City. The system serves the northeast portion of the City and is bounded by La Salle Avenue to the north, Hilby Avenue to the south, Soto Street to the west and General Jim Moore Boulevard to the east. The rest of the City is served by Cal-Am, a privately owned and operated company. Cal-Am serves their customers with water drawn from Carmel River surface water, alluvial ground water in the Carmel Valley, and from the Seaside coastal ground water basin. MCWD serves Fort Ord lands within the City limits.

The Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD) has authority over the creation or expansion of all water districts and allocates supplies to cities within its jurisdiction. MPWMD has established criteria by which water credits are allocated for new development. Residential water credits are based on the number of plumbing fixtures. To build a subordinate unit on an existing lot, the number of plumbing fixtures must be maintained for both the main and subordinate units, making the addition of a full functioning unit difficult. To build housing in commercial zones, the existing commercial use must be reduced in size to provide water credits for the units.

Seaside has allocated the entirety of its remaining water balance, some of which is appropriated for proposed economic development projects, which include mixed-use projects. The City’s development strategy is to focus on mixed-use developments to promote balanced jobs and housing growth. Additionally, in 2020 the City allocated 5 acre-feet of water to support the development of ADUs in Seaside – over 140 pending and completed projects have moved forward utilizing this water allocation
Although water scarcity and the provision of an alternative water supply is ultimately beyond the control of the City, Seaside supports regional efforts to create new water supply projects and the use of recycled water. In July 2016, the State Water Resources Control Board revised the schedule for California American Water Company (Cal-Am) to cease-and-desist illegal diversions of water from the Carmel River. The deadline was extended by five years from the end of 2016 to the end of 2021, to allow time for completion of various regional projects. The projects include two new water supply projects, the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (MPWSP) and the Pure Water Monterey Project (Pure Water) will provide water to Monterey Peninsula communities.

MPWSP is a proposed desalination project with a capacity of up to 9.6 million gallons per day.

Pure Water would deliver purified recycled water for groundwater replenishment, domestic delivery to Monterey Peninsula urban water customers and treated water for Salinas Valley irrigation. The Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority and the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District are jointly developing Pure Water. Additionally, cal-Am anticipates that a second pipeline for an existing groundwater storage project, the Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project, will allow for additional lawful diversions from the Carmel River in wet years. Under the requested changes to Cal-Am’s compliance schedule, Cal-Am would not be penalized for continued Carmel River diversions up to 7,990 afa so long as permitting and construction milestones for the water supply and diversion projects are met.

Seaside City CouncilDecember 7, 2023

Seaside City Council
December 7, 2023