Seaside City Council
December 4, 2025

THE CITY OF SEASIDE

MEASURE X ANNUAL PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025
The City of Seaside Annual Program Compliance Report presents the City’s efforts and actions taken during the fiscal year (FY) 2024/2025 on the programing and use of Measure X to fund local roadway rehabilitation projects within the City of Seaside.

The City of Seaside received a Bond of approximately $10,000,000 for improvements to various roadways as part of the Pavement Rehabilitation Project for both the design and construction elements. The Bond financing payments use Measure X Revenues, which are included in the Measure X Revenues in the table below.

The revenue earned in FY24/25 that was not expended by the end of the Fiscal Year will be carried over and applied to the projects programmed for FY25/26.

CITY OF SEASIDE - FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 BALANCE SHEET

REVENUES
Carryover from Previous Year* $1,747,806.12
Measure X Revenues $1,333,429.23
Earning on Interest $56,999.68
TOTAL REVENUES: $3,138,235.00
EXPENDITURES – MEASURE X
FY 2022/2023 Pavement Rehabilitation (Construction) $ 518,048.89 Terrace Street Paving (Construction) $109,218.10
Fremont/Monterey Gap Closure (Construction) $104,774.55 FY 2024/2025 ADA Curb Ramp (Construction) $187,449.57
Traffic Calming – Hilby Avenue (Design & Construction) $363,486.40 Traffic Calming – San Pablo Calming (Design) $68,123.70 Traffic Calming – Coe Avenue (Design & Construction) $21,528.80 Pavement Management Program (Non-Construction) $ 23,321.25 Broadway Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvements
Project (Design) $27,293.00
Debt Service – Measure X Bond $642,150.02
Audit Fee $2,575.00
Central Service Charge $294.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: $2,068,263.28
TOTAL EXPENDITURES (MSR X AND BOND): $2,068,263.28
FUND BALANCE, END OF PERIOD (MSR X): $1,069,971.75
* FY 24/25 Audited Report
Packet Page 184

Project Details
Title: FY 2022/2023 Pavement Rehabilitation
Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 24/25 included construction of the FY 2022/2023 Pavement Rehabilitation Project. Portions of the following residential roadway segments were overlaid with HMA: Flores Place, Flores Street, Grandview Street, Harding Street, Lincoln Street, Waring Street, Yosemite Street, Villanova Court, Metz Avenue and Velerton Court.

Construction began in August 2024 and was completed in May 2025. The scope of the work included base repairs, AC overlay, and accessibility improvements. The project is funded through Measure X, SB 1 funds and City General Funds.

Benefits: The project improves the overall PCI of the residential roadway network within the City.

Overlays improve drivability and the quality of the roadway, and alleviate further pavement deterioration.

Phase: Construction – Complete
Title: Terrace Street Paving
Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 24/25 was the repaving of Terrace Street.

The design was completed in-house. The paving project began in February 2025 and was completed in April 2025. The scope of work included grinding of asphalt and repaving on Terrace Street between Olympia Avenue and Broadway Avenue and grinding of asphalt and repaving of half the block of Olympia Avenue west of Terrace Street. The project was funded through Measure X.

Benefits: The Project will improve the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the residential roadway network within the City, while enhancing roadway safety and drivability. The improvements provide smoother, more durable surfaces for motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians, supporting long-term maintenance and infrastructure reliability.

Phase: Construction – Complete
Packet Page 185

Title: Fremont/Monterey Gap Closure
Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 24/25 included pedestrian improvements between Seaside High School and Fremont Boulevard and Monterey Road.

The design was completed in-house. Construction began in April 2025 and is estimated to be completed in early 2026. The scope of the work included constructing a sidewalk ramp leading to an existing dirt trail and an infill sidewalk wrapping up the hill from an existing curb ramp on the corner of Fremont Blvd and Monterey Road to the Seaside High School entrance gate. The work included relocating the drainage inlet, adjusting, lowering and working around utility boxes, and constructing a retaining wall adjacent to the sidewalk. The project was funded through Measure X.

Benefits: This project improves pedestrian safety and accessibility by providing a continuous sidewalk connection from Fremont Boulevard and Monterey Road to the Seaside High School entrance. The new sidewalk and ramp enhance walkability for students and residents and improve overall neighborhood connectivity.

Phase: Construction – completed in FY 25/26.

Title: FY 24/25 ADA Curb Ramp
Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 24/25 included construction of ADA Curb Ramps citywide.

Design was completed in-house. Construction began in April 2025 and was completed in June 2025. The scope of the work included project management, and removal of non-compliant curb returns and replacement with accessible curb ramps per Caltrans A88A standard detail at 44 selected locations. The project was funded through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and Measure X.

Benefits: This project enhances accessibility and safety for all pedestrians and ensures compliance with accessibility standards, promoting safe and equitable mobility.

Phase: Construction - Complete
Packet Page 186

Title: Hilby Avenue Traffic Calming Improvement Project Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 24/25 included construction of the comprehensive traffic calming plan for Hilby Avenue and Sonoma Avenue from Yosemite Street to Mescal Street. Additionally, parking lot striping was included.

Construction began in May 2025 and is scheduled to be completed in December 2025. The scope of the work included construction of asphalt speed cushions, slurry seal and striping and signage.

The project is funded through Measure X, SB 1 funds and City General Funds.

Benefits: Construction of traffic calming measure along Hilby Avenue and Sonoma Avenue will reduce speeds and collisions and resulting in safety gains for the community.

Phase: Construction – In-progress
Title: Traffic Calming – Coe Avenue
Description:

In fiscal year (FY) 24/25 this traffic calming project on Coe Avenue was designed (in-house) and constructed to address ongoing issues with speeding and frequent collisions, improving safety for all roadway users.

The design was completed in-house. Construction began in March 2025 and was completed in June 2025. The scope of the work included advanced warning signs, signage, installing concrete K-Rail and restoring fencing along Coe Avenue. The project was funded through Measure X and General Funds.

Benefits: Alerts drivers of the upcoming curved roadway and protects nearby properties from reckless driving behavior.

Phase: Construction – Complete
Title: San Pablo Avenue Traffic Calming Improvement Project Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 24/25 included preparation of a comprehensive traffic calming plan for San Pablo Avenue from Mescal Street to General Jim Boulevard.

The final traffic-calming plan was approved in December 2023 with design beginning in 2024.

Construction started on the project in August 2025. The scope of the work in the design phase includes three sets of asphalt speed cushions, slurry seal and striping and signage. The project is funded through Measure X and SB 1 funds.

Packet Page 187

Benefits: San Pablo Avenue is a residential roadway in the City, which has high rates of speeding.

Construction of traffic calming measure along San Pablo Avenue will reduce speeds, increase visibility, and provide high visibility crosswalks, resulting in increased safety for the surrounding neighborhood.

Phase: Design – Complete. Construction – In-Progress.

Title: Pavement Management Program
Description:

The ongoing expense of the Pavement Management Program in FY 24/25 was the cost of the annual subscription of StreetSaver, a pavement management system, and the 2024 Pavement Management Program Update.

The purpose of a Pavement Management Program (utilizing StreetSaver) is to track inventory, store work history and furnish budget estimates to optimize funding for improving the city’s pavement system. A Program Update was conducted between October 2024 and June 2025. The scope of work included a reinspection of the arterial collector road segments, approximately 80 centerline miles, and a presentation of finding to City Council. Additionally, Measure X funds were used for the annual StreetSaver subscription. StreetSaver provides the City with a powerful Pavement Management System analysis tool to maintain our local streets and roads. The program is only funded through Measure X funds.

Benefits: This Pavement Management Program assists the City in its efforts to monitor treatments and track their effectiveness and help the City in setting future priorities and treatment policies.

Phase: Subscription costs and Program Update
Title: Broadway Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvements Project Description:

The actions performed by City staff in fiscal year (FY) 24/25 included design of the Broadway Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvements Project. The project will implement a road diet on Broadway Avenue from Fremont Boulevard to General Jim Boulevard, reducing Broadway Avenue from a 4-lane roadway to a 2-lane roadway with curb extensions, bike lanes, roundabouts, and crosswalks. Improvements on Yosemite Street will be bicycle pavement markings and signage.

Design for the project began in September 2023, with construction anticipated to begin in Spring 2026. In FY 2024/25, staff contracted plan review services to assist with reviewing the final design plans in preparation for construction. The contracted work included review of the 60%, 95%, and 100% plan submittals. The project is funded through Measure X, Active Transportation Program (ATP), and Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funds.

Benefits: The Project will enhance safety and mobility for all users by calming traffic, adding protected bike lanes, improving pedestrian crossings, and creating safer intersections. These Packet Page 188

improvements will promote walking and biking, reduce collisions, and support a more connected and accessible transportation network for the community.

Phase: Design-Complete.

List of Attachments
The following Attachments are included in the Annual Program Compliance Report:

ATTACHMENT 1: Annual Independent Audit
ATTACHMENT 2: Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
ATTACHMENT 3: Pavement Management Program Report
ATTACHMENT 4: Project Photos
Packet Page 189
ATTACHMENT 1

ANNUAL INDPENDENT AUDIT
Packet Page 190

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND

INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORTS

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2025
Packet Page 191
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
Packet Page 192

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Independent Auditor’s Report ........................................................................................................... 1 Basic Financial Statements:

Balance Sheet ......................................................................................................................... 3 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance ................................ 4 Notes to the Financial Statements .......................................................................................... 5 Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance with TAMC Ordinance No 2016-01 – Transportation Safety and Investment Plan (TAMC PLAN) ................................................... 7 Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ......................................... 11 Packet Page 193
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
Packet Page 194
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Honorable Members of the City Council
City of Seaside, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the City of Seaside, California (City) Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund (Fund) as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Fund’s basic financial statements as listed in the Table of Contents.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of June 30, 2025, and the changes in financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirement relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Fund and do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the City of Seaside, as of June 30, 2025 or the changes in its financial position for the fiscal year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.

Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
1 Packet Page 195
In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, we:
• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit.

Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated November 7, 2025, on our consideration of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.

Pleasant Hill, California
November 7, 2025
2 Packet Page 196

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND

BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2025
ASSETS
Cash and Investments 717,272 $
Due from other governments 352,700
Total Assets 1,069,972 $

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable - $
Total Liabilities -

FUND BALANCES
Restricted 1,069,972
Total Fund Balances 1,069,972
Total Liabilities and Fund Balances $ 1,069,972
See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements

3 Packet Page 197

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025

REVENUES
Transportation Safety Taxes 1,333,429 $
Interest Revenue 56,999
Total Revenues 1,390,428

EXPENDITURES
Transfers to City of Seaside for Bond payment and capital projects 2,065,394 Reporting and Implementation 2,869
Total Expenditures 2,068,263

EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (677,835)
Fund Balances - Beginning of Year 1,747,807
FUND BALANCES - END OF YEAR $ 1,069,972
See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements
4 Packet Page 198

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2025
NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The financial statements of the City of Seaside Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units (GAAP). The Activities' reporting entity applies all relevant Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) pronouncements.

Reporting Entity
The City of Seaside receives Measure X funding from the Transportation Agency of Monterey County for the purpose of street and road infrastructure improvements. In addition, Measure X funds can be utilized to match grants, loans, programs, and pay annual debt service to fund eligible approved bonds for local road maintenance or safety projects. The financial statements present only the City of Seaside Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund and do not purport to, and do not present, the City's financial position and changes in financial position. The City of Seaside's basic financial statements are available from the City's website at http://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/190/Budget-Financial-Statements.

Basis of Accounting
The accounting and financial reporting treatment applied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus.

The City of Seaside Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund is presented as a governmental fund type. Governmental funds are accounted for using a current financial resources measurement focus. The application of this measurement focus provides that, in general, only current assets and current liabilities are present on the balance sheet. Operating statements of these funds present revenues and expenditures.

The modified accrual basis of accounting is used for all governmental funds. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when they become susceptible to accrual (i.e., both measurable and available). Measurable means that the amount of the transaction can be determined.

Available means the funds are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. For Measure X Funds, the City considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 120 days of the end of the current fiscal period, in order to capture all revenues related to the current fiscal year.

Expenditures of governmental funds are generally recognized when the related fund liability is incurred.

NOTE 2 – CASH DEPOSITS
The City follows the practice of pooling cash and investments for all funds under its direct daily control.

Interest earned on pooled cash and investments is allocated periodically to the various funds based on average cash balances. Detailed disclosure regarding the City's investments of cash is included in the City of Seaside basic financial statements.
5 Packet Page 199

CITY OF SEASIDE

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN ACCOUNT FUND

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2025
NOTE 3 – MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT
The Measure X Master Programs Funding Agreement between the City of Seaside and the Transportation Agency of Monterey County, as amended, requires that the City must expend each fiscal year from its general fund for street and highway purposes an amount not less than the annual average of its expenditures from its general fund during the 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 fiscal years, but not less than what was expended in 2016-17 (when Measure X passed), as reported to the State of California Controller pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 2151 ("Maintenance of Effort"). This baseline amount will be indexed annually to the Engineering News Record construction index.

Maintenance of Effort: $791,380
Total expenditures from the general fund for street and highway purposes for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 was $3,202,201. The City was in compliance with the Maintenance of Effort requirement of the Measure X Master Programs Funding Agreement between the City of Seaside and the Transportation Agency for Monterey County.
6 Packet Page 200
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON
COMPLIANCE WITH TAMC ORDINANCE NO. 2016-01

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND INVESTMENT PLAN (TAMC PLAN)
To the Honorable Members of the City Council
City of Seaside, California
Report on Compliance for TAMC PLAN
Opinion on Compliance for TAMC Plan
We have audited the City of Seaside, California (City) Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund’s (Fund) compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants specified in the Transportation Agency for Monterey County's (TAMC) Ordinance No. 2016-01 Transportation Safety and Investment Plan (TAMC Plan)) and in the Measure X Master Programs Funding Agreement between TAMC and the City (Measure X Agreement) that could have a direct and material effect on the Fund for the year ended June 30, 2025.

In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on the Fund for the year ended June 30, 2025.

Basis for Opinion on the TAMC Plan
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS); the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (Government Auditing Standards), and requirements specified in the Funding Agreement. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our report.

We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for the TAMC Plan. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.

Responsibilities of Management for Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the TAMC Plan.
7 Packet Page 201
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the City’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards and requirements specified in the Funding Agreement will always detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the City’s compliance with the requirements of the TAMC Plan as a whole.

In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards and the Funding Agreement, we:
• exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the City’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
• obtain an understanding of the City’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the requirements referred to above, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.

Report on Internal Control Over Compliance
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of the TAMC Plan on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of the TAMC Plan that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
8 Packet Page 202
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not identified.

Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.

The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements, specified in TAMC Ordinance and Measure X Agreement. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.

Pleasant Hill, California
November 7, 2025
9 Packet Page 203
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
Packet Page 204
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS

BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED

IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
To the Honorable Members of the City Council
City of Seaside, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the basic financial statements of the City of Seaside, California (City) Transportation Safety and Investment Plan Account Fund (Fund) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and have issued our report thereon dated November 7, 2025.

Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Fund’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that have not been identified.

Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Fund’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our test disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Governmental Audit Standards.
11 Packet Page 205
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Fund’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.

Pleasant Hill, California
November 7, 2025
12 Packet Page 206
ATTACHMENT 2

FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM
Packet Page 207
CITY of SEASIDE Attachment 2

MEASURE X FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FOR FISCAL YEARS 2025/2026– 2029/2030

S:\CIP\Active Projects\Measure X\Funding and Reporting\FY2022-23 Report to TAMC\5Yr CIP YEAR 1 (FY25/26)
Project Description & Phase Total Cost Measure X PCI
2023 Pavement
Rehabilitation
(Carry over)
Construction Complete, final payment
processed in FY25/26. $3,165,145 $341,500 <60
2025 Pavement
Rehabilitation
(Carry Over)
Design & Construction: Rehabilitate
deteriorated roadway sections within
the City
$1,770,000 $380,000 <60
Street Sign
Upgrades
Replacement of regulatory signs
citywide. $56,500 $56,500 NA
Sidewalk
Program Sidewalk repair citywide $140,000 $140,000 NA
Fremont/Monte
rey Gap Closure
Construction – sidewalk ramp and
infill sidewalk wrapping hillside from
corner of Fremont Blvd. and Monterey
Rd to the Seaside High School
entrance gate.
$250,000 $155,225 NA
Hilby Avenue
Traffic Calming
(Carry Over)
Construction – traffic calming
measure on Hilby Avenue from
General Jim Moore Blvd. to Canyon
Del Rey Blvd.
$1,784,603 $870,900 NA
San Pablo &
Baker Street
Traffic Calming
(Carry Over)
Construction: Traffic calming
measures on San Pablo, Mescal St to
General Jim Moore Blvd.
$1,306,390 $370,000 NA
Street Striping Striping improvements citywide $210,000 $210,000 NA Pavement
Management
Program
Update the StreetSaver database. $30,880 $30,880 NA
Broadway
Complete Street
Corridor
Improvements
PSE final completion of bid
documents and reporting
requirements.
$16,080,000 $42,700 NA
Fremont –
Broadway
Intersection
Design of curb ramp and signal
improvements at the intersection. $50,000 $50,000 NA
Totals: $24,843,518 $2,647,705
Packet Page 208
CITY of SEASIDE

MEASURE X FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FOR YEARS 2024/25– 2027/28
S:\CIP\Active Projects\Measure X\Funding and Reporting\FY2024-25 Report to TAMC\Attachment 2_Five-Year CIP_FY25-26.docx YEAR 2 (FY 26/27)
YEAR 3 (FY 27/28)
Project Description & Phase Total Cost Measure X PCI
2027
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Design & Construction:

Rehabilitate deteriorated roadway
sections within the City
$1,000,000 $300,000 <60
Sidewalk
Program Sidewalk repair citywide $300,000 $300,000 NA
Totals: $1,300,000 $600,000
YEAR 4 (FY 28/29)
Project Description & Phase Total Cost Measure X PCI
2028
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Design & Construction:

Rehabilitate deteriorated roadway
sections within the City
$1,000,000 $300,000 <60
Sidewalk
Program Sidewalk repair citywide $300,000 $300,000 NA
Totals: $1,300,000 $600,000
YEAR 5 (FY 29/30)
Project Description & Phase Total Cost Measure X PCI
2029
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Design & Construction:

Rehabilitate deteriorated roadway
sections within the City
$1,000,000 $300,000 <60
Sidewalk
Program Sidewalk repair citywide $300,000 $300,000 NA
Totals: $1,300,000 $600,000
DEFINITIONS OF REQUESTED INFORMATION:

1. Project: The title of the project to receive Measure X funding.

2. Description & Phase: A general description of the project and the phase (e.g. Environmental; Design; Right-of-Way; or Construction) that will be funded in the given year.

3. Total Cost: The total cost of the project.

4. Measure X: The amount of Measure X funding that will be expended on the project.

5. PCI: The Pavement Condition Index for the roadway, from the local jurisdiction’s Pavement Management Program.

Project Description & Phase Total Cost Measure X PCI
2026
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Design & Construction:

Rehabilitate deteriorated roadway
sections within the City
$1,000,000 $300,000 <60
Sidewalk
Program Sidewalk repair citywide $300,000 $300,000 NA
Totals: $1,300,000 $600,000
Packet Page 209
ATTACHEMENT 3

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT
Packet Page 210

ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
440 Harcourt Avenue Telephone 831-899-6835
Seaside, CA 93955 Fax 831-899-6211
www.ci.seaside.ca.us
Include, Innovate, Inspire
December 4, 2025
To: Todd Muck
Executive Director
Transportation Agency for Monterey County
55-B Plaza Circle
Salinas, CA 93901
Re: Pavement Management Program Annual Report Letter
The City of Seaside confirms that it has a Pavement Management Program that conforms to the criteria established by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County and included in the Measure X Agreement with the Local Agency. An approved Pavement Management Program must be in place to be eligible for Measure X funds.

The Pavement Management Program utilizes a software system developed by:
_X_ Metropolitan Transportation Commission StreetSaver
____ Other :________________
The system was updated by PEI and contains, at a minimum, the following elements:
• Inventory of all existing pavements under the local agency jurisdiction:

Centerline miles: 80.05 miles
Total lane miles (or equivalent units): 152.92 miles
The last update of the inventory was completed on: November 2024 • Pavement Condition Index (PCI) 55
• Identification of sections of roadways brought up to acceptable PCI levels for the current year.

Waring Street – Hilby Avenue to Broadway Ave PCI= 100
Flores Place – Waring Street to Flores Street PCI= 100
Flores Street – Broadway Avenue to La Salle Avenue PCI= 100 Grandview Avenue – Luxton Street – Circle Avenue PCI= 100 Harding Street – Elm Avenue to Mingo Avenue PCI= 100
Yosemite Street – Broadway Avenue to Mingo Avenue PCI= 100 Lincoln Street – San Pablo Avenue to La Salle Avenue PCI= 100 Villanova Court – Yosemite Ave to End PCI= 100
Velerton Court – Yosemite Ave to End PCI= 100
Calaveras Street – Sonoma Avenue to Elm Avenue PCI= 100 Packet Page 211
Alhambra Street – Hamilton Avenue to Sonoma Avenue PCI= 100 Tierra Street – Williams Avenue to Hilby Avenue PCI= 100 Carson Street – Kimball Avenue to End PCI= 100
Isabelle Court – Kimball Avenue to End PCI= 100
Wanda Avenue – Virginia Street to End PCI= 100
Palm Avenue – 360 feet west of Terrace Street PCI= 100
Terrace Avenue – Palm Avenue to Elm Avenue PCI= 100
Trinity Avenue – Fremont Blvd to Harcourt Avenue PCI=
Yosemite Avenue – La Salle to Ord Grove Avenue PCI=
Waring Avenue – La Salle Avenue to Ord Grove Avenue PCI= Elm Avenue – San Lucas to Fremont Blvd. PCI=
Elm Avenue – Del Monte Blvd. to Hillsdale PCI=
Amador Avenue – Canyon Del Rey to Imperial Street PCI=
Lightfigter Drive – 1
st Avenue to 2nd Avenue PCI=
Mescal Avenue – Broadway Avenue to Sonoma Avenue PCI=
• Estimated budget needs to rehabilitate or replace deficient sections for the current year and the next three years:
$128,194,709.00 (Unconstrained Needs)
You may direct any questions regarding the system to Leslie Llantero at (831) 899- 6832, [email protected], or myself at (831) 899-6884.

Sincerely,
______________________________________________
Thomas Korman, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Packet Page 212
ATTACHMENT 4

PROJECT PHOTOS
Packet Page 213
Attachment 4

PROJECT PHOTOS
FY 2022/2023 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
Grandview
Before After

Lincoln
Before After

Packet Page 214
Attachment 4
Yosemite
Before After

Packet Page 215
Attachment 4
2024/2025 ADA CURB RAMP
BEFORE
Hamilton Avenue and Alhambra Street Amador Avenue and Calaveras Street AFTER

Hamilton Avenue and Alhambra Street Amador Avenue and Calaveras Street Packet Page 216
Attachment 4

TRAFFIC CALMING - HILBY AVENUE
BEFORE

AFTER
Packet Page 217
Attachment 4

FREMONT/MONTERY GAP CLOSURE

BEFORE AFTER
TRAFFIC CALMING – COE AVENUE

BEFORE AFTER
Packet Page 218
Attachment 4

TERRACE STREET PAVING
Before

After
Packet Page 219

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 7.L.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Leslie Llantero, Assistant Engineer
Thomas Korman, Public Works Director/City Engineer
DATE: December 4, 2025
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION INCREASING THE HILBY AVENUE

TRAFFIC CALMING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH

MONTEREY PENINSULA ENGINEERING FOR AN AMOUNT NOT
TO EXCEED $73,000.00 FOR ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS ON SONOMA AVENUE

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution.

BACKGROUND
On April 3, 2025, the City Council approved a construction contract with Monterey Peninsula Engineering (MPE) for the Hilby Avenue Traffic Calming Improvements Project. The project included the installation of nine speed cushions, red curb at key intersections, new centerline and edge-line striping, pavement markings, signage, and a slurry seal along lower Hilby Avenue between Canyon Del Rey Boulevard and Fremont Boulevard. Construction is now complete; however, the project has not yet been formally closed out an a contingency balance of $11,564.60 remains.

The updated conceptual traffic calming plan for the Dual Language Academy of the Monterey Peninsula (DLAMP) identifies similar improvements. Proposed work on Sonoma Avenue between Yosemite Street and Mescal Street includes two sets of speed cushions, new centerline and edge-line striping, red curb at the school entrance, signage, and curb extensions at the mid-block crosswalk.

To reduce overall project costs and time, staff recommends adding these improvements to the existing construction contract. MPE has submitted a proposal to complete the Packet Page 220

Item No. 7.L. Page 2 of 2
work for an amount not to exceed $73,000.00, with striping representing the majority of the cost at bid item pricing. If approved, the contractor can complete the improvements during the school’s winter break, minimizing impacts to school operations and roadway users.

FISCAL IMPACT
There are adequate funds in the Traffic Calming Account (212-8960-9580) to add $73,000.00 to MPE construction contract for additional traffic calming improvements on Sonoma Avenue.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Community Safety & Quality of Life

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. DLAMP Revised TC Plan
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 221
Meeting Date:
12/4/2025
Item #: 7.M.

RESOLUTION NO. 25-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

INCREASE THE HILBY AVENUE TRAFFIC CALMING CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACT WITH MONTEREY PENINSULA ENGINEERING FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $73,000.00 FOR ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS ON SONOMA AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE DUAL LANGUAGE

ACADEMY OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA
WHEREAS, on April 3, 2025, the City Council approved a construction contract with Monterey Peninsula Engineering (MPE) for the Hilby Avenue Traffic Calming Improvements Project, which included the installation of nine speed cushions, red curb at key intersections, new centerline and edge-line striping, pavement markings, signage, and a slurry seal along lower Hilby Avenue between Canyon Del Rey Boulevard and Fremont Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, construction of the Hilby Avenue Traffic Calming Improvements Project is now complete, but the project has not yet been formally closed out; and WHEREAS, the updated conceptual traffic calming plan for the Dual Language Academy of the Monterey Peninsula (DLAMP) identifies similar traffic calming improvements on Sonoma Avenue between Yosemite Street and Mescal Street, including two sets of speed cushions, new centerline and edge-line striping, red curb at the school entrance, signage, and curb extensions at the mid-block crosswalk; and WHEREAS, Monterey Peninsula Engineering has submitted a proposal to construct the identified improvements for an amount not to exceed $73,000.00; and WHEREAS, there is sufficient funds in the Traffic Calming Account No. 212-8960- 9580 to fund the additional amount, and
WHEREAS, including these improvements in the existing construction contract will streamline delivery and reduce overall project costs.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside does hereby increase the Hilby Avenue Traffic Calming construction contract with Monterey Peninsula Engineering for an amount not to exceed $73,000.00 for additional traffic calming improvements on Sonoma Avenue.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 4th day of December, 2025, by the following vote:

Packet Page 222
-2
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Ian Oglesby, Mayor

ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, Legal Council
Packet Page 223
OF
REVISIONS 07/07/2025
P-1
1" = 20'

DUAL LANGUAGE ACADEMY OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT PLAN 1
474-8949-001
1 CITY OF SEASIDE
6001 Shellmound St, Ste 500
Emeryville, CA 94608
(510) 343-6400
Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

R 0 20' 40'
0 20' 40'
Packet Page 224

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.A.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Dan Meewis, Assistant City Manager
Greg McDanel, City Manager
DATE: December 4, 2025
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REVISED MAYOR'S

YOUTH FUND POLICY

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution authorizing the revised policy.

BACKGROUND
The Mayor’s Youth Fund is a long-standing discretionary program that provides supplemental financial assistance to Seaside youth and youth-serving organizations.

Established in the early 1980s, the Fund is supported through an annual $60,000 contribution from GreenWaste Recovery, Inc. In alignment with the company’s environmental mission, the Fund has traditionally emphasized initiatives connected to “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle” and community environmental stewardship.

The Fund supports scholastic, athletic, music, environmental, and arts activities that directly benefit Seaside youth. All allocations are considered by the City Council following staff review for eligibility and completeness. A formal policy governs program eligibility, application procedures, and post-award reporting expectations. Significant policy revisions occurred in 2011, 2012, and 2018, with the last revision adding activity checkboxes, disclosure of other funding sources, reporting requirements, and reinforcement of environmental criteria.

In recent years, the City has experienced growing demand for assistance, increased submittals from school-based programs, and recurring questions about eligible uses.

These trends prompted the City Council to direct staff to return with a revised and modernized policy.

Packet Page 225

Item No. 8.A. Page 2 of 4
The revised policy incorporates updates identified during Council discussion on November 20, 2025. Key refinements include:

Eligibility and Activity Alignment
Requests must align with at least one of the following categories: scholastic, athletic, music, environmental, or arts. In addition, applicants must clearly demonstrate a measurable environmental sustainability component, expanding beyond the original "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle" framework to reflect modern sustainability practices.

Clarification for School-Based Requests
A new section provides criteria for evaluating requests submitted through schools or district-affiliated programs. School-based requests may be considered when:
• The project provides a clear municipal or community benefit. • The request supplements, rather than supplants, district funding. • The activity involves collaboration with Seaside businesses, community organizations, or City departments.
• A principal or district administrator provides written approval. • An environmental sustainability component is clearly addressed.

This section responds to Council's request for improved clarity regarding "scholastic" eligibility, school-day programming, and the appropriate use of resources within educational settings.

Definition of Allowable and Ineligible Uses
The revised policy now explicitly defines eligible expenditures, which may include:
• Field or facility rentals, entry fees, and supplies
• Equipment or uniforms supporting youth participation
• Transportation and travel associated with eligible activities • Payments for qualified referees or contracted service providers • Materials supporting environmental sustainability, civic engagement, or community service
The following uses are expressly ineligible:
• Standard classroom supplies
• Textbooks and staff salaries
• Religious or political activities
• Personal gifts
• Food or entertainment unrelated to program outcomes
Packet Page 226

Item No. 8.A. Page 3 of 4
• Rewards or incentive-based items
Application and Reporting Enhancements
Additional revisions to the application and closing report strengthen transparency and consistency, including:
• A more robust description of the environmental sustainability component • A clearer requirement to document the municipal/community benefit • A dedicated signature line for school principal or district administrative approval These changes improve application completeness, align with the Fund's environmental objectives, and support consistent evaluation by staff and Council.

Alternatives for Council Consideration
• Adopt the revised Mayor's Youth Fund Policy as presented. • Provide direction for additional revisions and direct staff to return with an updated policy for Council consideration.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of this policy.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Diverse and Inclusive Community

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution - MYF Policy

2. Draft Mayors Youth Fund 11.24.25
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

Packet Page 227

Item No. 8.A. Page 4 of 4
____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 228
Meeting Date: x/xx/xx
Item #: X.X.

RESOLUTION NO. XX-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

ADOPTING A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REVISED MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND POLICY
WHEREAS, the Mayor’s Youth Fund was established to provide supplemental financial assistance to students and nonprofit organizations serving youth residing in the City of Seaside; and
WHEREAS, the Fund is supported through an annual contribution from GreenWaste Recovery, Inc., whose environmental mission aligns with the Fund’s requirement to promote “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle” principles; and WHEREAS, the Mayor’s Youth Fund Policy establishes eligibility criteria, contribution limits, environmental sustainability requirements, and administrative procedures to ensure funds are used appropriately and equitably to serve the youth of Seaside; and
WHEREAS, the City Council last revised the policy in 2018 and has identified the need for updates addressing allowable expenditures, school-coordinated requests, and clarity regarding environmental and municipal benefit requirements; and WHEREAS, staff has prepared a revised policy which incorporates Council direction; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the revised policy provides clearer guidance to applicants, strengthens environmental and municipal benefit standards, and improves accountability and alignment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside hereby approves and adopts the Revised Mayor’s Youth Fund Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 4th day of December 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS

Packet Page 229
-2
APPROVED:
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor

ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 230
Mayor’s Youth Fund
986 Hilby Avenue, Seaside CA 93955
831-899-6800 | FAX: 831-718-8603

Revised 11/24/25
MAYOR’S YOUTH FUND POLICY
Purpose: The Mayor’s Youth Fund provides supplemental financial assistance to Seaside youth and youth-serving organizations that enhance well-being, leadership, civic engagement, recreation, environmental sustainability and/or climate resilience. The Mayor’s Youth Fund Policy has been developed to standardize the evaluation of contribution requests and ensure that the funds are used appropriately to serve the City’s youth.

Eligible Applicants: Contributions will only be made to, or on behalf of, students or organized groups, such as schools and non-profit organizations based in Seaside and/or serving a majority of Seaside residents (≥ 50%) that are 18 years old or younger or enrolled in high school. Faith based organizations may apply for contributions from the Mayor’s Youth Fund if the funding is not used to support religious activities such as worship, Sunday School, or religious instruction. In addition, activities funded by the Mayor’s Youth Fund must be open to all participants regardless of religious affiliation.

Allowable Expenditures: Eligible expenditures may include:
➢ Event or program costs such as field or facility rental, entry fees, or supplies. ➢ Equipment or uniforms directly supporting youth participation in extracurricular, athletic, cultural, or environmental programs.
➢ Transportation or travel expenses directly tied to eligible events ➢ Stipends or payments for qualified referees or contracted service providers directly supporting an approved youth event, program, or tournament. ➢ Materials or supplies advancing environmental sustainability, climate resilience, cleanenergy awareness, conservation, waste-reduction efforts, community stewardship, or civic engagement.

The following expenses are not eligible: standard classroom supplies, textbooks, staff salaries or stipends, religious or political activities, personal gifts, activity rewards, or food and entertainment unrelated to program outcomes.

School Coordinated Funding Requests: Funding requests coordinated through schools may be considered when:
➢ The project provides a clear municipal or community benefit. ➢ Requests supplement but do not supplant school district funding. ➢ The activity involves collaboration with Seaside businesses, organizations, or City departments.
➢ The application includes written approval from the school principal of the participating school or an authorized district administrator confirming the project aligns with district policy and is not otherwise fully funded.

Submittal of Contribution Requests: In order to request a contribution, the following information must be provided in writing:

Packet Page 231
Mayor’s Youth Fund
986 Hilby Avenue, Seaside CA 93955
831-899-6800 | FAX: 831-718-8603

Revised 11/24/25
➢ Name of the organization, person(s) benefiting, proposed use of the funds, total amount needed.
➢ Description of other fundraising or contributors.
➢ An explanation of how the group, activity, or event will benefit Seaside youth. ➢ A written description of how the proposed activity or event contributes to environmental sustainability and climate resilience, which may include: waste reduction, recycling, reuse, pollution prevention, clean-energy or solar-powered education, water conservation, habitat restoration, community stewardship, or other practices that support a healthy and sustainable Seaside.
➢ How this request will provide a municipal benefit (i.e., benefit the community). ➢ Proof of non-profit status (not a taxpayer’s I.D. number) and a current W-9 form. ➢ If the request originates from a school or district-affiliated program, written sign-off by school principal or appropriate school district administrator must accompany the application.

Incomplete applications will not be forwarded for Council consideration.

Evaluation Process and Criteria: Funding requests are subject to City Council approval following staff review for eligibility and completeness. Evaluation will consider:
➢ Scholastic, athletic, music, environmental and art activities will be considered for funding based on the quality of the proposed activity.
➢ Evidence that the activity or event contributes to environmental sustainability and climate resilience, such as waste-reduction practices, recycling and reuse efforts, clean-energy or solar-power learning, conservation initiatives, habitat restoration, or community stewardship projects that support a healthy environment. ➢ Contributions requests will be accepted from individuals and can be made to an organization on behalf of an individual member or student. ➢ Contributions are only paid to organizations, such as non-profit groups and schools. ➢ Contributions are intended to fund actual costs related to an event or activity. (Please see “Payment Process” information provided below.)
➢ Contributions from the Mayor’s Youth Fund are not intended to be the sole source of funds for an organization or program and will only be made to supplement other fundraising activities.
➢ How this request will provide a municipal benefit (ie., benefit the community).

Contribution Limits: In order to equitably distribute funds available in the Mayor’s Youth Fund, the following contribution guidelines have been developed, although all contributions are subject to the discretion of the City Council.

Individuals 25% of total cost of activity (not to exceed $1,000) Groups (≤ 20 persons) up to $1,500
Groups (≥ 21 persons) up to $3,000
Funding is limited to one contribution per applicant or organization within a twelve-month period.

Packet Page 232
Mayor’s Youth Fund
986 Hilby Avenue, Seaside CA 93955
831-899-6800 | FAX: 831-718-8603

Revised 11/24/25
Funding Requirements:
➢ Submit the Mayor’s Youth Fund Closing Report within 60 days of event, activity, or program completion. Applicants that do not furnish the report may not apply for funds for the following year.
➢ A representative from the organization is required to be at the Council meeting for their application to be heard. If no representative is present then the agenda item will be postponed to another City Council meeting upon notification by the applicant. ➢ Incomplete applications will not be forwarded for Council consideration; applications not answering the question related to reduce, reuse or recycle/environmental sustainability AND municipal benefit are considered incomplete.

Individual Requests: Please attach an itemized list of all expenses. Amount of funding request may not exceed 25% of the total cost of the activity and not exceed $1,000.

Payment Process: If a contribution is approved by the City Council, payment will be made to the authorized organization or directly to the vendor selected by the authorized organization after submittal of a receipt or the presentation of actual invoices. No funding payments shall be made directly to individuals, ensuring compliance with municipal auditing standards.

Submission: All requests will be considered before the City Council and you will be notified of the specific date your item is placed on the agenda. Please return this completed form with necessary attachments to:

Dan Meewis
City of Seaside Recreation Services
440 Harcourt Avenue
Seaside, CA 93955

Packet Page 233
Mayor’s Youth Fund
986 Hilby Avenue, Seaside CA 93955
831-899-6800 | FAX: 831-718-8603

Revised 11/24/25
MAYOR’S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST
CONTACT INFORMATION:

Organization: _________________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant: ____________________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________ City: _____________________ State: _____ Phone: __________________ Email: _____________________________________________ Number of Participants:
_____
Seaside Residents / Students: _____% Ages: ___________
CRITERIA:

Applicants must meet at least one of the following criteria to be eligible for funding. Please select one or more from the following list:
 Scholastic  Athletic  Music  Environmental  Art  Other_______________ Is funding a reward for one of these activities?  No  Yes, ___________________________

1. Description of event, activity, or program funding pertains to: (Attach additional information as necessary)
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________

2. Description of how funds will be specifically used for youth groups, activities and events:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________

3. Describe how the event, activity, or program contributes to environmental sustainability and climate resilience.

Examples may include: waste reduction, recycling or reuse efforts, clean-energy or solar-power education, water conservation, pollution prevention, community cleanups, school garden projects, habitat restoration, or other activities that support a healthy and sustainable environment.

Packet Page 234
Mayor’s Youth Fund
986 Hilby Avenue, Seaside CA 93955
831-899-6800 | FAX: 831-718-8603

Revised 11/24/25
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________

4. Description of how the event, activity, or program has a municipal community benefit:

Examples may include: representing Seaside in regional competitions, providing community service, supporting a local event, environmental improvements, leadership development, or youth engagement consistent with City goals.
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________

5. What other fundraising activities are you participating in to fund your event, program, or activity? What other funding sources will supplement your requests? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Total Amount Requested: (See contribution limits) $ ___________ Applicant Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________ School-affiliated requests require district approval:

Name: ________________________________
Title: ________________________________
School/District: ________________________________
Signature: ________________________________
Date: ________________________________
Packet Page 235
Mayor’s Youth Fund
986 Hilby Avenue, Seaside CA 93955
831-899-6800 | FAX: 831-718-8603

Revised 11/24/25
MAYOR’S YOUTH FUND CLOSING REPORT
CONTACT INFORMATION:

Organization: _________________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant: ____________________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________ City: _____________________ State: _____ Phone: __________________ Email: _____________________________________________ CONTRIBUTION INFORMATION:

Date the Mayor’s Youth Fund was approved by City Council: ___________________________ What Items were purchased with Mayor’s Youth Fund Donation? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Describe the activities associated with this project that contributed to environmental sustainability and climate resilience, and explain the resulting municipal community benefit. Please provide written description, brief City Council presentation, and/or photos:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Applicant Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________ *This form is due 60 days upon receipt of funding by the applicant. Organizations that do not comply within the 60 day time period may not apply for funding for the following year.

Packet Page 236

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.B.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Kirstin van Gend, Administrative Analyst II
Leslie Llantero, Assistant Engineer
Thomas Korman, Public Works Director/City Engineer
DATE: December 4, 2025
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO APPROPRIATE $4,000,000.00 IN 2025 MID-CYCLE

REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (RSTP)

GRANT FUNDING TO THE BROADWAY AVENUE COMPLETE

STREETS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BUDGET

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the appropriation.

BACKGROUND
In 2020, the City applied for and received grant funds from the Active Transportation Program (ATP), the Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) and Measure X for the design and construction of the Broadway Avenue Corridor Improvements Project (Project). The Project will implement a road diet on Broadway Avenue from Fremont Boulevard to General Jim Boulevard, reducing Broadway Avenue from a 4-lane roadway to a 2-lane roadway with curb extensions, bike lanes, roundabouts, and crosswalks.

Improvements on Yosemite Street will include bicycle pavement markings and signage.

In July 2025, City staff was notified by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) that there were unaccounted Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) interest reserves, and that there was an opportunity to fund active projects exceeding their budgets. Staff requested additional funding for the Broadway Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvements Project in order to construct all phases of the project.

On August 27, 2025, the TAMC Board approved the City of Seaside's funding request, Packet Page 237

Item No. 8.B. Page 2 of 2
awarding $4,000,000.00 in RSTP grant funds for the Broadway Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvements Project. The funds must be expended by August 28, 2028.

Staff requests that the City Council authorize the Finance Director to appropriate the awarded funds into the Project budget. The Project is anticipated to go out to bid in Spring 2026, with construction expected to begin in fall 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
The current total FY 25/26 Budget for the Broadway Avenue Corridor Improvements Project (Account No. 212-8950-9600) is $9,971,259.83. After the budget appropriation, the Project would have a total budget of $13,971,259.83.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Enhanced Physical Infrastructure & Abundant Water Supply

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. TAMC Master Funding Agreement Exhibit A - Seaside - signed Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 238
Meeting Date: 12/04/25
Item #: X.X.

RESOLUTION NO. 25-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO APPROPRIATE $4,000,000.00 IN 2025 MID-CYCLE REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (RSTP)

GRANT FUNDING TO THE BROADWAY AVENUE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Broadway Avenue Corridor Improvement Project will implement a road diet on Broadway Avenue from Fremont Boulevard to General Jim Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the Project is funded through the Transportation Program (ATP), the Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) and Measure X; and WHEREAS, in July 2025, City staff was notified by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) that there were unaccounted Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) interest reserves, and that there was an opportunity to fund active projects exceeding their budgets; and
WHEREAS, staff requested additional funding for the Broadway Avenue Corridor Improvements Project in order to complete all phases of the project; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 2025, the TAMC Board approved the funding request, awarding the City of Seaside and the Broadway Avenue Corridor Improvements Project $4,000,000.00 in RSTP grant funding to be expended by August 28, 2028.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside does hereby authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $4,000,000.00 in 2025 mid-cycle Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Grant funding to the Broadway Avenue Corridor Improvement Project Budget (Account No. 212-8950-9600).

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 4th day of December, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Packet Page 239
-2
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor

ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 240
Transportation Agency for Monterey County
Master State and Federal Funding Agreement
Exhibit A
City of Seaside
Agency Board Approval Date Fund Expiration Date Type Active Projects Budget Paid Balance Outstanding Seaside 3/22/2017 3/22/2020 RSTP Fair Share Intersection Control Evaluation & Corridor Studies Project $ 221,900.96 $ 196,172.50 $ 25,728.46 Seaside 8/27/2025 8/26/2028 RSTP Fair Share San Pablo Traffic Calming Improvement Project $ 201,391.43 $ - $ 201,391.43 Seaside 8/27/2025 8/26/2028 RSTP Mid-Cycle 2025 Broadway Corridor Improvements $ 4,000,000.00 $ - $ 4,000,000.00 $ 4,423,292.39 $ 196,172.50 $ 4,227,119.89
Agency Board Approval Date Fund Expiration Date Type Completed Projects Budget Paid Balance Outstanding Seaside 3/26/2014 Completed RSTP Competitive Broadway Ave. Improvements $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ - Seaside 8/27/2014 Completed RSTP Fair Share Broadway Ave. Improvements $ 542,962.00 $ 542,962.00 $ - Seaside 8/27/2014 Completed RSTP Fair Share Final Design & Construction of Coe Avenue Bikeway $ 606.00 $ 606.00 $ - Seaside 8/27/2014 Completed TDA 2% West Broadway Urban Village Infrastructure Improvements Project $ 251,250.00 $ 251,250.00 $ - Seaside 8/27/2014 Completed RSTP Competitive West Broadway Urban Village Infrastructure Improvements Project $ 3,359,801.29 $ 3,359,801.29 $ - Seaside 9/28/2016 Completed RSTP Fair Share West Broadway Urban Village Infrastructure Improvements Project $ 1,588.00 $ 1,588.00 $ - Seaside 12/4/2019 Completed RSTP Safe Streets Pedestrian Intersection Improvements Project $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ - Seaside 8/26/2020 Completed RSTP Competitive Broadway Avenue Corridor Improvements $ 600,000.00 $ 600,000.00 $ - Seaside 3/24/2021 Completed RSTP Fair Share Pavement Management Program Update $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ - Seaside 3/24/2021 Completed RSTP Fair Share ATP Grant Application Assistance - Broadway Avenue Complete Streets $ 9,435.00 $ 9,435.00 $ - Seaside 3/24/2021 Completed RSTP Fair Share Engineering and Traffic Survey $ 74,953.75 $ 74,953.75 Seaside 3/24/2021 Completed RSTP Fair Share Pavement Rehabilitation Phase 4 - Design and Construction $ 70,286.24 $ 70,286.24 $ - $ 5,660,882.28 $ 5,660,882.28 $ -
Last Revised: 8/27/2025 Approved by:

Todd Muck, Executive Director
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/TAMC NEW/Funding/01_Master Agreements & Exhibit A/Exhibit A/TAMC Master State - Fed Funding Agreement Exhibit A Packet Page 241
2025-0827 TAMC Master Funding Agreement
Exhibit A - Seaside
Final Audit Report 2025-09-08
Created: 2025-09-04
By: Janneke Strause ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAMBjV9GdZffacwvnB0MUtnuyGWlFe0KJZ "2025-0827 TAMC Master Funding Agreement Exhibit A - Seasi de" History
Document created by Janneke Strause ([email protected]) 2025-09-04 - 10:03:36 PM GMT
Document emailed to Todd Muck ([email protected]) for signature 2025-09-04 - 10:03:38 PM GMT
Email viewed by Todd Muck ([email protected])
2025-09-08 - 6:02:20 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Todd Muck ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2025-09-08 - 6:03:36 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2025-09-08 - 6:03:36 PM GMT
Packet Page 242

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.C.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Sheri Damon, City Attorney
DATE: December 4, 2025
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF

LAND FROM MONTEREY SALINAS TRANSIT (MST) DISTRICT

AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL

DOCUMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PARK WITH

TRANSPORTATION AMENITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE CAMPUS
TOWN PLANNING AREA FOR $270,000.00 PLUS COSTS, TO BE

FULLY REIMBURSED BY THE CAMPUS TOWN DEVELOPERS

THROUGH THE PUBLIC BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution.

BACKGROUND
The Campus Town Specific Plan represents a key strategic initiative for the City of Seaside, envisioning a vibrant, mixed-use district that serves both the community and visitors. The Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council following extensive environmental review and public input, establishing a framework for future development in this critical area of the city.

MST currently owns the subject property, a 1.62-acre parcel located at a highly visible, strategic intersection within the Campus Town Specific Plan area. The property's location at Colonel Durham Street and Seventh Avenue provides excellent visibility and accessibility, making it well-suited for public use.

The City has been in negotiations with MST regarding acquisition of this strategic property. MST has agreed to sell the property to the City for $270,000, with the City responsible for all closing costs associated with the transaction and demolition Packet Page 243

Item No. 8.C. Page 2 of 5
associated with the building and hardscape on site. The acquisition is provided AS-IS and the property is subject to a public benefit conveyance deed restriction which limits the use to transportation oriented uses.

DISCUSSION
Proposed Use
The City intends to develop the property as a multi-purpose public facility combining:
• Public park amenities and open space
• Transportation-oriented infrastructure, which may include but is not limited to:
o Public parking facilities
o Bus stop facilities
o Electric vehicle charging stations
o Bicycle repair station(s)
This combined use aligns with the goals of the Campus Town Specific Plan by providing both recreational opportunities and supporting sustainable transportation options in the area. The transportation-oriented elements complement the park use and enhance connectivity within the Campus Town district. This also will satisfy the conveyance deed restriction of providing transportation-oriented uses for the property.

Purchase Terms
Purchase Price $270,000
Closing Costs City responsibility
Property Size Approximately 1.62 acres
Assessor's Parcel No.031-151-024-000
Location SW corner of Colonel Durham & Seventh Ave
Table 1: Summary of acquisition terms
The purchase price of $270,000 for 1.62 acres represents approximately $3.83 per square foot, which staff considers favorable for property within the Campus Town Specific Plan area given its location and development potential for public purposes. The property does have a dilapidated building on-site, however, the demolition costs will be assumed by the City as a part of the Campus Town Phase 2 demolition activities.

Strategic Value
This acquisition provides several strategic benefits to the City:

1. Campus Town Implementation - Advances the goals and objectives of the adopted Campus Town Specific Plan by securing key property for public use

2. Park Access - Addresses community need for park space and recreational amenities in the Campus Town area

3. Transportation Hub - Creates opportunity for multi-modal transportation infrastructure supporting regional transit, electric vehicles, and parking needs Packet Page 244

Item No. 8.C. Page 3 of 5

4. Public Investment - Establishes City ownership of strategic real estate at a critical intersection within the planning area

5. Development Catalyst - Signals the City's active implementation of Campus Town, potentially encouraging private investment

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The acquisition of this property is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) on two independent bases:

Class 16 Categorical Exemption
The acquisition qualifies for the Class 16 categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines section 15316 (14 CCR § 15316), which applies to the acquisition of land for park purposes. The property will be preserved and developed for park use, and there are no unusual circumstances that would cause a significant environmental effect.

Campus Town Specific Plan Environmental Documents
Additionally, the acquisition and subsequent development of the property for park and transportation-oriented purposes is specifically addressed within the environmental documents previously certified by the City Council for the Campus Town Specific Plan.

The proposed use is consistent with the land uses analyzed in those environmental documents. There are no new environmental impacts beyond those previously analyzed, and no changed circumstances exist that would require additional environmental review under CEQA Guidelines section 15162.

FISCAL IMPACT
Acquisition Costs
Cost Item Estimated Amount
Purchase Price $270,000
Estimated Closing Costs $15,000
Title and Escrow $8,000
Survey and Due Diligence$5,000
Contingency $7,000
Total Estimated Cost $305,000
Table 2: Estimated acquisition costs
Funding for this acquisition will be provided by KB Bakewell Seaside Venture in accordance with the Purchase and Sale Agreement which allows for the advanced release of some of the two million dollars in public benefit funds for acquisitions within the Campus Town Planning area. No General Fund impact is anticipated.

Future Development Costs
Future costs for park development and installation of transportation infrastructure will be subject to separate approvals of subdivision improvement agreements with KB Bakewell Seaside Venture as the plans are developed and designed.

Packet Page 245

Item No. 8.C. Page 4 of 5

NEXT STEPS
Upon City Council approval of the attached resolution, staff will:

1. Execute the purchase and sale agreement with MST

2. Open escrow and complete title review and due diligence

3. Complete all closing requirements

4. Record the deed transferring ownership to the City

5. Begin process for park design and programming

6. Return to City Council with park development plans and budget proposals The anticipated timeline for closing the transaction is 60-90 days from Council authorization, subject to completion of standard due diligence and closing requirements.

CONCLUSION
This property acquisition represents a strategic opportunity to advance the implementation of the Campus Town Specific Plan while providing valuable park space and transportation infrastructure for the community. The purchase price is reasonable, funding is available, and the project is environmentally exempt. Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to complete this acquisition.

FISCAL IMPACT
$270,000 plus closing costs to be reimbursed from the public benefit funds provided by the Developer of Campus Town.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Vibrant Local Economy, Diverse and Inclusive Community, Enhanced Physical Infrastructure & Abundant Water Supply, Community Safety & Quality of Life

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution MST-rev

2. MST-Seaside PSA-DRAFT FINAL

3. Campus Town MST location map parcel
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

Packet Page 246

Item No. 8.C. Page 5 of 5
____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 247
Meeting Date: 12/4/2025
Item #: X.X.

RESOLUTION NO. 25-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER ACQUIRE PROPERTY FROM THE

MONTEREY SALINAS TRANSIT DISTRICT LOCATED WITHIN THE CAMPUS TOWN SPECIFIC PLANNING AREA FOR $270,000 PLUS CLOSING COSTS AND

EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE ACQUISITION WHEREAS, the City of Seaside has strategically been working to implement the Campus Town Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, The Monterey-Salinas Transit District (MST) owns real property located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Colonel Durham and Seventh Avenue and identified in the County of Monterey Assessor records as APNS 031-151- 024-000 totaling approximately 1.62 acres located within the Campus Town Specific Planning Area (“Property”); and
WHEREAS, The City of Seaside (“City”) desires to acquire from MST the Property for the purpose of developing a City-owned park for transportation-oriented purposes such as public parking, bus stop, and/or charging stations along with a Cityowned park; and WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that the purchase price will be $270,000 plus the City will pay the costs to close the transaction; and WHEREAS, the purchase and sale agreement between KB Bakewell Seaside Venture II and the City of Seaside contemplate the payment of a public benefit payment of approximately two million dollars which with concurrence of the Developer may be advanced for benefits in and around Campus Town; and WHEREAS, KB Bakewell Seaside Venture II has agreed that this acquisition qualifies for the early release of the public benefit funds for acquisition; and WHEREAS, the acquisition of this property is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR 15316 as the property is being acquired for park purposes; and WHEREAS, the action and subsequent development of a park is specifically addressed by the environmental documents certified by the City for the Campus Town Packet Page 248
-2
Specific Plan, there being no additional impact beyond those that were previously analyzed and no changed circumstances affecting this acquisition and use of property; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside hereby finds the above declarations true and correct. The City Council further authorizes the City Manager to acquire approximately 1.6 acres from Monterey Salinas Transit District located within the Campus Town Planning area for $270,000 plus closing costs and to execute such documents and take such actions to implement said transaction as such documents are finally reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular City Council meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 4TH day of December, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor

ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 249

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
by and between the

CITY OF SEASIDE
And

MONTEREY-SALINAS TRANSIT DISTRICT
Packet Page 250
{THJ-01030909;1} D-1

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
This Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of __________, 2025 (“Effective Date”), by and between the Monterey-Salinas Transit District (MST), a public transit district organized under California law (“Seller”), and the City of Seaside, a municipal corporation organized under California law (“Buyer”). Seller and Buyer are collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS]
A. MST owns the land generally located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Colonel Durham and Seventh Avenue more particularly described on Exhibit “A” (the “Property”) and identified in the County of Monterey Assessor records as APNS 031-151- 024 totaling 1.62 acres more or less.

B. MST acquired the Property from the Department of Transportation via Quitclaim Deed recorded in Monterey County Records on or about 4/10/2003 as Recorded Document Number 2003041526. This Quitclaim Deed was amended on or about 6/10/2010 to add the CERCLA condition of warranty via Recorded Document number 20100322204.

C. City desires to acquire from MST all the real property comprising of approximately 1.62 acres of real property in AS IS condition as well as all property and land bounded by Colonel Durham and Seventh Avenue for the purpose of developing such Land as a City owned park with transportation-oriented parking, bus stop, and charging stations.

D. The City and MST agree that this transaction will be exempt from the Surplus Lands Act, Government Code sections 54221(f)(1)(D) and 54222.3 creates an exemption when the transfer is from one local agency to another local agency for the agency’s use. The City intends to retain this property for use as parking and park lands.

NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES AGREE THAT:

1. Property
Seller agrees to sell and Buyer agrees to purchase the real property located in the City of Seaside, County of Monterey, State of California (the “Property”)Army Parcels L2.4.3.1 and L2.4.3.2, Assessor’s Parcel No. 031-151-024-000 totaling approximately 1.62 acres of land together with all improvements, rights, and appurtenances located thereon or associated therewith.

2. Purchase Price
The total purchase price for the Property is Two Hundred Seventy Thousand Dollars ($270,000.00) (“Purchase Price”).

3. Payment
Packet Page 251
{THJ-01030909;1} D-2
Buyer shall pay the Purchase Price to Seller in full at closing by wire transfer or other immediately available funds.

4. Condition of Property; “As-Is” Sale
Buyer acknowledges that it has had the opportunity to inspect the Property and agrees to accept the Property AS IS, WHERE IS, and WITH ALL FAULTS as of the closing date. Seller makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the condition, fitness, or suitability of the Property for any particular purpose.

Buyer understands that this property is subject to a Public Benefit Conveyance and agrees that it will take all steps necessary and develop such property subsequently in accordance to the underlying deed restrictions as may be existing and enforceable.

5. Deed and Title
At closing, Seller shall convey to Buyer all of Seller’s right, title, and interest in and to the Property by Quitclaim Deed in substantially the form attached as Exhibit B. Title shall vest in Buyer free and clear of encumbrances created by Seller, except for matters of record, easements, and governmental restrictions.

6. Closing
Closing of the sale shall occur on or before __________, 2025, at a mutually agreed time and place, or through an escrow with a title company designated by the Parties. Upon closing:
• Seller shall deliver the executed Quitclaim Deed to Buyer or the escrow holder. • Buyer shall deliver the Purchase Price as provided above. • Each Party shall execute any additional documents reasonably required to complete the transaction.

7. Costs and Prorations
Buyer shall pay all recording fees and any escrow fees associated with the transfer. Real property taxes, if applicable, shall be prorated as of the closing date. Seller shall not be obligated to pay any transfer taxes (since both Parties are public agencies).

8. Possession
Possession of the Property shall be delivered to Buyer upon close of escrow.

9. Entire Agreement
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the sale of the Property and supersedes all prior negotiations or discussions, whether oral or written.

Packet Page 252
{THJ-01030909;1} D-3

10. Governing Law
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

11. Execution
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

SELLER:

Monterey-Salinas Transit District
By: ___________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: _________________________
Date: _________________________
BUYER:

City of Seaside
By: ___________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: _________________________
Date: _________________________
Attachments:

Exhibit A: Property Description
Exhibit B: Form of Quitclaim Deed

Packet Page 253
{THJ-01030909;1} D-4
EXHIBIT “A”

Packet Page 254
{THJ-01030909;1} D-5
EXHIBIT “B”

FORM OF QUITCLAIM DEED
Recording Requested by and when recorded return to,
and mail tax statements to:

Exempt from Recording Fees Pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383
Documentary transfer tax is $__________ based on the full value of the property conveyed.

QUITCLAIM DEED
The undersigned grantor(s) declare(s):

FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the MontereySalinas Transit District (“Grantor”) hereby QUITCLAIMS to (“Grantee”) the land (the “Land”) located in the City of Seaside, County of Monterey, State of California described on Exhibit “A”.

SUBJECT TO, all matters of record.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Quitclaim Deed as of the date set forth below.

Dated: ________________________ MONTEREY-SALINAS TRANSIT DISTRICT By: _____________________________________
Print Name: ______________________________

ATTEST:
__________________________________________
Clerk to the Board Commented [A1]: Should this be MST Clerk? Packet Page 255
{THJ-01030909;1} D-6

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by this deed or grant from Monterey-Salinas Transit to the City of Seaside, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City of Seaside pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the Seaside City Council adopted INSERT A DATE and the Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its fully authorized officer.

CITY OF SEASIDE
By: __________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, City of Seaside Mayor
Date: _____________________________

Packet Page 256
{THJ-01030909;1} D-7
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of Monterey
)
)
)
On before me, (insert name and
title of the officer) personally appeared
, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
Signature of Notary Public
Packet Page 257
DRAFT
{THJ-01030909;1} i
Packet Page 258
Packet Page 259