Agenda packet — Seaside City Council, March 19, 2026

A G E N D A

CITY OF SEASIDE REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR 440 HARCOURT AVE (COUNCIL CHAMBER) AGENCY TO THE Thursday, March 19, 2026
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5:00 PM
Virtual Participation Guide: https://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/129/City-Council-Committee-Agendas https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofSeasideCalifornia | https://ci-seaside-ca-us.zoom.us/j/81936832059 | WEBINAR ID: 819 3683 2059 | (669) 900-9128

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL – ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM
Ian N. Oglesby
David R. Pacheco
Alexis Garcia-Arrazola
Rita Burks
Alex Miller
Mayor/Chair
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair
Council/Agency Member
Council/Agency Member
Council/Agency Member

3. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. REVIEW OF AGENDA
If there are any items that arose after the 72-hour posting deadline, this is the point in the meeting where a vote may be taken to add the item to the agenda. (A 2/3- majority vote is required).

5. PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on matters within the jurisdiction of the City of Seaside, but not on this agenda, may do so during the Public Comment period for up to three (3) minutes. Public Comments for "Presentations" on this agenda are also taken at this time; comments on specific agenda items are heard under that item. For the public record, please state your name.

6. PUBLIC AGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
This is a time specifically set aside for representatives of public agencies to make brief comments of general interest to the City Council and the community.

A. SEASIDE CITY NEWS BROADCAST AND COMMENTS FROM THE CITY

MANAGER

7. PRESENTATIONS
A. UPDATE ON THE CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN (SENIOR

PLANNER, BETH ROCHA)

8. CONSENT AGENDA
Packet Page 1
City Council REGULAR Meeting March 19, 2026 5:00 PM Agenda Page 2 A. APPROVE MINUTES FROM MARCH 5, 2026, REGULAR MEETING
RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes.

B. APPROVE AND FILE CITY CHECKS
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and file the accounts payable and wired payments made during the period of December 27, 2025 through February 06, 2026, including the payroll and benefits checks, direct deposits, and wired payments related to the pay period December 29, 2025 through February 05, 2026.

Total Accounts Payable and Payroll for the following periods is:

December 27, 2025 through January 09, 2026 = $1,295,675.49 January 10, 2026 through January 23, 2026 = $2,046,661.45 January 24, 2026 through February 06, 2026 = $2,045,473.39 C. APPROVE AND FILE SUCCESSOR AGENCY CHECKS
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and file the accounts payable and wired payments made during the period of December 27, 2025 through February 06, 2026, including the payroll and benefits checks, direct deposits, and wired payments related to the pay period December 29, 2025 through February 05, 2026. Total Accounts Payable and Payroll for the above referenced period is $3,079.75.

D. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING APRIL 24, 2026, AS ARBOR DAY AND TO RAISE THE ARBOR FLAG FROM APRIL 24–30, 2026
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution recognizing Arbor Day and to raise the Arbor Day flag from April 24 to April 30, 2026.

E. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO CITY COMMISSIONS
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the appointment of Cathleen Pryor (Parks and Recreation Commission), Robert Ward (Planning Commission), Joy Anderson (CJOBS), and Shannon Simpson (C-JOBS).

F. APPROVE A MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST OF $3,000.00 FROM MONTEREY PENINSULA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO ASSIST WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR 2026 MPUSD

UPCYCLED PROM CLOSET
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the request.

G. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE ACTIVE

TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FOR ADA TRAIL

AND ABUTMENT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SAN PABLO BRIDGE
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize submission of the grant application.

Packet Page 2
City Council REGULAR Meeting March 19, 2026 5:00 PM Agenda Page 3 H. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE

REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM GRANT

APPLICATION FOR THE COE AVENUE AND GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD

AND SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize submission of the grant application.

I. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND
INSTALLATION OF 2–5 YEAR-OLD PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AT
LINCOLN CUNNINGHAM PARK FROM SPEC PLAY FOR $165,778.77, PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY, FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED
$182,356.65
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the purchase and installation agreements.

J. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2026 PAVING IMPROVEMENTS ON-CALL CONTRACT; AWARDING

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS TO THE TWO LOWEST RESPONSIVE,
RESPONSIBLE BIDDERS, DON CHAPIN CO., INC. AND QA
CONSTRUCTORS, INC.; AND AUTHORIZING AN ANNUAL NOT-TO-EXCEED FUNDING LIMIT OF $2,000,000
RECOMMENDATION: Approve contracts.

9. PUBLIC HEARING
A. RECEIVE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE HOMELESS COMMISSION AND

ADOPT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAMS AND PUBLIC
FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026- 2027 AND 2027-2028
RECOMMENDATION:

1. Receive the Homeless Commission’s recommendation regarding Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding allocations;

2. Approve funding allocations for CDBG public service programs and public facilities and infrastructure projects for Fiscal Years 2026-2027 and 2027- 2028; and

3. Authorize staff to draft the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan and make it available for public review and comment for a period of 30 days.

10. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE ANNUAL MID-YEAR FINANCIAL

REPORT AND AMENDMENTS TO THE BUDGET AND STREETS FUNDING POLICY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
RECOMMENDATION: Approve mid-year budget.

Packet Page 3
City Council REGULAR Meeting March 19, 2026 5:00 PM Agenda Page 4

11. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
A. NEW COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS

1. Discussion regarding establishing a business district for the downtown area on Broadway Ave (Miller)

2. Develop an action plan for economic development incentives (Pacheco) B. FOLLOW UP ON PREVIOUS REQUESTS

12. CITY ATTORNEY, CITY MANAGER, CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR

COMMENTS AND REPORTS ON COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
This is a time specifically set aside for members of the City Council, the City Manager and City Attorney to make brief comments of general interest to the community and report on committee assignments.

13. CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 et seq., the City Council and Successor Agency to Redevelopment Agency may adjourn to a Closed Session to consider specific matters dealing with litigation, certain personnel matters, property negotiations or to confer with the City Attorney. Public comments on these items are taken after being read by the City Attorney. For the public record, please state your name.

A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957
RECOMMENDATION: Title: City Manager
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.9 (D)(2)
Two matters of potential litigation

14. ADJOURNMENT
Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting:

April 2, 2026
5:00 PM
The City of Seaside is committed to providing accessible facilities and accommodating people with disabilities in all of its services programs and activities. If special considerations are needed by any person to fully participate in this meeting, contact the City Clerk at 899-6707 no fewer than two business days prior to the meeting to allow reasonable arrangements. Agendas are posted at:
http://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/129/City-Council-Committee-Agendas Agenda-related writings or documents provided during public meetings are available for public inspection during the meeting or from the office of the City Clerk. This agenda is posted in compliance with California Governor Newsom's Executive Orders N-29-20 and N-33-20.

Packet Page 4

DRAFT MINUTES

CITY OF SEASIDE REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR 440 HARCOURT AVE
AGENCY TO THE Thursday, March 5, 2026
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor/Chair Oglesby called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL – ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM
PRESENT: Garcia-Arrazola, Miller, Oglesby, Pacheco
ABSENT: Burks

3. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
A moment of silence was held for invocation. The pledge was led by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Pacheco.

4. REVIEW OF AGENDA
No changes.

5. PUBLIC COMMENT
Bobby Maxwell, Ann Marie Pagan, Lora James, Dianne Nielson, Ozzie V

6. PUBLIC AGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
A. MONTEREY ONE WATER UPDATE ON CAPITAL PROJECTS, RATE

STUDY AND UPCOMING PRIORITIES (EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PAUL

SCIUTO)
The presentation provided an information update that reviewed the agency role, services and facilities, public works in action, the current priorities that include:
electrical reliability, treatment master plan, and biosolids management; customer groups, and an overview of the wastewater rate study. The timeline for the public rate setting identified important dates to include:
• February 23 – the board voted not to modify flat rate structure; • March 30 – the board of directors meeting to receive public comment on the draft rate study;
• April 27 – the board of directors will meet to consider prop 218 notice and direct mailing to all parcel owners; and
• June 26 – the board of directors will meet and hold a public hearing (the date is still to be determined).

B. SEASIDE HIGH SCHOOL QUARTERLY UPDATE (PRINCIPAL

ANDREW AGUINIGA)
Packet Page 5
Thursday, March 5, 2026 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 2 The presentation reviewed school spirit events, and events that revolved around electives and careers, early college high school (“MIND Academy”), the launch of the family resource center and statistics on parent-teacher conferences; community events, and invitation to future events that include:
• March 7 & 14 – Drumline at Monterey Bay FC
• March 12 – Spring Concert
• March 19 – Coffee with the Principal
• April 16 – Open House
• April 18 - Moonflower Festival
C. SEASIDE CITY NEWS BROADCAST AND COMMENTS FROM THE

CITY MANAGER
The following community event and announcements were made:
• The Avery Gallery inside Seaside City Hall proudly presents this year’s Youth Art Competition. From March 11th through May 1st, the gallery will showcase the incredible creativity and talent of our community’s young artists. Join us for a special reception on March 20th from 6:00 to 8:30 PM. Enjoy an evening art viewing, celebrate the artists, and help us recognize participants as prizes and ribbons are awarded.
• The City of Seaside is proud to announce a new community partnership with Monterey Bay Football Club for the 2026 season, reinforcing a shared commitment to community engagement, youth development, and support for local businesses. Through this collaboration, the City and Monterey Bay FC will work together to highlight Seaside’s vibrant culture and entrepreneurial spirit while continuing to grow the region’s passion for professional soccer. • Speaking of MBFC…The wait is over, Union fans! Join us Saturday, March 7th at Cardinale Stadium as Monterey Bay FC takes on Oakland Roots SC in the 2026 Season Home Opener. It’s time to kick off a brand-new season right here on our home turf. Be one of the first 4,000 fans through the gates and score a FREE exclusive 2026 Monterey Bay FC scarf. Arrive early to make sure you don’t miss out on this special opening match giveaway. And the excitement doesn’t stop at the final whistle. Stick around for a post-game social and autograph session with the team. Meet your favorite players, grab photos, and celebrate the start of the season together. Saturday, March 7th at Cardinale Stadium. Let’s pack the house, and DEFEND THE 831! • The Seaside Recreation Department invites you to Movies in the Park on Friday, March 20th at 7 p.m.! Bring your blankets, family, and friends for a fun evening under the stars. And don’t forget—you get to help choose the movie! Cast your vote now at bit.ly/MITPMARCH2026. Voting closes soon, so don’t wait!
• Thursdays in Seaside means it’s time for the Seaside Farmers’ Market at Laguna Grande Park. The Spring Market runs from 3 to 7 p.m., with box distribution happening from 5 to 7 p.m., or until the boxes run out. • Do you know someone in the community who shines bright? Nominations for the Seaside Stars Awards open on March 1st! This is your chance to recognize outstanding individuals who make a difference in the City of Seaside. Whether it's a dedicated volunteer, an inspiring leader, or a community champion, we Packet Page 6
Thursday, March 5, 2026 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 3 want to hear about them! Submitting a nomination is easy—just visit bit.ly/seasidestars and fill out the form. But don’t wait too long! The deadline for entries is March 31st.
• You’re invited to an exciting and impactful Community Resource, Wellness, and Career Fair at Central Coast High School on Friday March 13th, from 11:30 am – 2:30 pm. Coordinated by Valley Health Associates in collaboration with CCHS, this growing annual event has become a powerful example of what happens when community partnerships rally around students and families. We encourage students, families, and community members to attend and take advantage of these valuable resources. We hope to see you there! • Join FOSPA on Saturday, March 7th at Durant Park, and on the 14th at Capra Park AND Martin Park, for a day of service and outdoor fun! For more information, including future workdays and locations, visit Friends of Seaside Parks.org.
• The 2026 MPUSD Upcycled Prom Closet is here to make prom night unforgettable – with a perfect outfit at no cost. Hosted by the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District, students are invited to the Oldemeyer Center on March 7th from 11 AM – 2 PM, to browse a wide collection of FREE prom dresses, suits, and accessories. For more information, call 831-645- 1200.
• Attention residents, business owners, and local commuters…here’s you’re chance to learn about the future of Broadway Avenue! The City of Seaside Public Works Engineering team is hosting a special Open House for the Broadway Avenue Complete Street Corridor Project. Join us Tuesday, March 24th, 2026, from 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. at the Seaside Fire Station, located at 1635 Broadway Avenue. This important project will transform Broadway Avenue between Fremont Boulevard and General Jim Moore Boulevard beginning in fall 2026. Planned improvements include new roundabouts, dedicated bike lanes, and enhanced roadway features designed to improve safety, accessibility, and traffic flow for everyone. Stop by to learn more about the project details, construction timeline, and how these upgrades will benefit our community. City engineers will be available to answer your questions and gather your feedback. The Open House is free and open to the public.

Tuesday, March 24th from 6-9PM at the Seaside Fire Station.

The City Manager provided the following updates:
• Postponement of Mid-Year Budget
• Budget Sessions on May 26 and May 27
• Follow up on 1281 Broadway to be provided at March 19 meeting

7. CONSENT AGENDA
PUBLIC COMMENT: Samantha Ciccone, Michael Velasquez
On motion by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Pacheco and second by Council/Agency Member Garcia-Arrazola and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency moved to approve the consent agenda as presented.

Packet Page 7
Thursday, March 5, 2026 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 4 RESULT: 4-1-0-0
AYES: Garcia-Arrazola, Miller, Oglesby, Pacheco
NOES: Burks
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
A. APPROVE MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 19, 2026, REGULAR MEETING ACTION: APPROVED
B. ACCEPT AND FILE THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2025 ANNUAL

COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT, THE GOVERNANCE LETTER AND

THE GANN LIMIT REPORT FOR THE CITY OF SEASIDE
ACTION: ACCEPTED & FILED
C. APPROVE A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING MARCH AS RED CROSS MONTH
ACTION: ACCEPTED & FILED
D. APPROVE A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING CESAR CHAVEZ DAY ON MARCH 31, 2026
ACTION: APPROVED
E. APPROVE A FEE WAIVER REQUEST FROM THE PARENTING

CONNECTION OF MONTEREY COUNTY FOR THE USE OF THE SEASIDE ROOM FOR THEIR FAMILY EVENT "MEET YOUR VILLAGE" ON MARCH 29, 2026, IN THE AMOUNT OF $108.00
ACTION: APPROVED
F. APPROVE A FEE WAIVER REQUEST FROM MONTEREY COUNTY BRANCH

OF NAACP FOR THE USE OF SEASIDE COMMUNITY CENTER, ON MARCH 22, 2026, AND THE LAGUNA GRANDE HALL AT THE OLDEMEYER CENTER ON APRIL 19, 2026, FOR THEIR CULTURAL DIVERSITY FILM SHOWING AND DISCUSSION SESSIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $573.00
ACTION: APPROVED
G. APPROVE A MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST OF $3,000.00 FROM KINDNESS ROCKS 831 TO ASSIST WITH THE COST ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR ANNUAL SPRING EGG HUNT ON MARCH 28, 2026
ACTION: APPROVED
H. APPROVE A MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST OF $3,000.00 FROM BETHEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH TO ASSIST Packet Page 8
Thursday, March 5, 2026 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 5

WITH THE COST ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR YOUTH EDUCATION &

ENRICHMENT PROGRAM
ACTION: APPROVED
I. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH GRANICUS, INC. FOR SMARTGOV PERMIT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $33,679.65, WITH A TERM EXPIRING NOVEMBER 30, 2026 ACTION: ADOPTED RESO #26-19
J. ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2025 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL

PROGRESS REPORT (APR) AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF THE

REPORT TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD) AND THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF

LAND USE AND CLIMATE INNOVATION
ACTION: ADOPTED RESO #26-20
K. ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2025 HOUSING ELEMENT

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT (APR) AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF

THE REPORT TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD) AND THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF

LAND USE AND CLIMATE INNOVATION
ACTION: ADOPTED RESO #26-21
L. ADOPT A RESOLUTON APPROVING THE CITY OF SEASIDE 2026

LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM
ACTION: ADOPTED RESO #26-22

8. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. REVIEW DESIGN OPTIONS FOR THE LINCOLN-CUNNINGHAM PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT (AGES 2–5)
Assistant Public Works Director, Andreas Baer, provided the presentation that reviewed the background of the improvements at the park and the bid results for the 2-5-year-old playground area. The selected options included from the following suppliers: Miracle Play, Kompan (Option 1 – Boat), SPEC Play, Kompan (Option 2 – Tower), and Game Time.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Ann Marie Pagan, Bobby Maxwell, Donna Penwell, Karla Lobo, Jennie Reese
On motion by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Pacheco and second by Council/Agency Member Miller and carried by the following vote, the City Council/Successor Agency Packet Page 9
Thursday, March 5, 2026 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 6 moved to select the structure supplied by SPEC Play for the 2-5-year-old playground at Lincoln-Cunningham Park.

RESULT: 4-1-0-0
AYES: Garcia-Arrazola, Miller, Oglesby, Pacheco
NOES: Burks
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
ACTION: SELECTED SPEC PLAY SUPPLIER
B. REPORT ON COMMERCIAL PROPERTY VACANCY TAXES IN CALIFORNIA City Manager Greg McDanel provided a presentation that reviewed policy intent, California jurisdictions with commercial vacancy taxes, structural components, legal considerations, administrative considerations, effectiveness and policy observations.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Ann Marie Pagan, Peter Kaiser
This item was for information only. No action was taken.

9. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS
A. NEW COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS

1. Discussion regarding establishing a business district for the downtown area on Broadway Ave (Miller)

2. Develop an action plan for economic development incentives (Pacheco) B. FOLLOW UP ON PREVIOUS REQUESTS

10. CITY ATTORNEY, CITY MANAGER, CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR COMMENTS

AND REPORTS ON COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
Reports provided.

11. CLOSED SESSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE 54957.6
Agency Negotiators: Greg McDanel, City Manager; Samantha Sahkrani, Human Resources Director/Risk Manager
Employee Organizations: Seaside Police Officers' Association, Seaside Firefighters' Association, Seaside Public Safety Managers' Association, Seaside City Employees Association, Seaside Managers Employee Association, Non-Represented NonExempt Confidential Employees, Non-Represented Exempt Confidential Packet Page 10
Thursday, March 5, 2026 City Council REGULAR Meeting Page 7 Employees, Executive Employees, Unclassified Exempt Employees, and Unclassified Non-Exempt Employees
No report. Instructions were given to the negotiators.

B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
Property: 956 Hilby Avenue, Seaside, CA 93955
Agency Negotiator: City Manager & City Attorney, et. al.

Negotiating Parties: Stepping Stone Outreach, Inc. and City of Seaside Under Negotiation: Price, terms of payment, or both
Instructions were given to the negotiators.

C. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
Property: Commonly referred to as a portion of Main Gate at Divarty and First Avenue
Agency Negotiators: City Manager, City Attorney, et al.

Negotiating Parties: Fort Ord Hostel Society, LLC and the City of Seaside Under Negotiation: Price, Terms or both
Instructions were given to the negotiators.

D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.9 (d)(2)
Two matters of potential litigation
Authorized the City Attorney to file a lawsuit against the Fort Ord Hostel Society.

12. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:48p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
_________________________ _________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
Packet Page 11

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.B.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Corryn Bennett, Accountant II
DATE: March 19, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVE AND FILE CITY CHECKS

RECOMMENDATION
Approve and file the accounts payable and wired payments made during the period of December 27, 2025 through February 06, 2026, including the payroll and benefits checks, direct deposits, and wired payments related to the pay period December 29, 2025 through February 05, 2026.

Total Accounts Payable and Payroll for the following periods is:

December 27, 2025 through January 09, 2026 = $1,295,675.49 January 10, 2026 through January 23, 2026 = $2,046,661.45 January 24, 2026 through February 06, 2026 = $2,045,473.39

BACKGROUND
In accordance with Government Code Section 37208, at each City Council meeting, the Council is provided a listing of the payroll and general checks issued since the last report so that the checks can be inspected and confirmed. Each purchase has been reviewed and approved by the department making the purchase at the time of procurement. The invoices have been reviewed by the Finance Department prior to payment to ensure that they conform to the approved budget.

Therefore, in accordance with Government Code Section 37208, the above referenced and linked list of checks conforms to the approved budget and has been paid. These checks are submitted to the City Council for inspection and confirmation.

A description of the checks and wires exceeding $10,000.00 are as follows:

Packet Page 12

Item No. 8.B. Page 2 of 5
• $27,662.23 to CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER for Multiple City water accounts under Cal-Am Water 11/22/25-12/22/25. Service addresses include city buildings, parks, fire hydrants, irrigation stations, and city affordable housing. • $25,793.90 to CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER for Multiple City water accounts under Cal-Am Water 12/23/25-01/22/26. Service addresses include city buildings, parks, fire hydrants, irrigation stations, and city affordable housing. • $13,284.00 to FRIENDS OF SEASIDE PARKS ASSOCIATION for FY 2025/2026 Community Social Services Grant Reimbursement for pollinator gardens project. • $10,107.50 to PARAMETRIX, INC. for Professional developing services through November 28, 2025: On-call traffic engineering services. • $17,366.25 to PARAMETRIX, INC. for Professional developing services through December 31, 2025: On-call traffic engineering services. • $10,100.00 to DRONESENSE, INC. for Subscription for remote drone UAS Class 1 & 2 license for the Fire Department for the period of 09/15/2025-09/14/2026. • $15,518.17 to ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO for Professional legal services for labor negotiations for the periods of September - December 2025.
• $11,776.34 to JOHN C GEMMA for Professional network support services for the periods of Oct-Dec 2025; one year subscription renewal for virtual desktop software.
• $42,100.00 to WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS INC for Professional building plan review services for the period of November and December 2025. • $29,207.50 to MONTEREY COUNTY DESTINATION MKTG ORG, INC. for Quarter 1 (01/01/2026-03/31/2026) TOT jurisdiction improvement investment. • $13,558.17 to GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS, INC. for December 2025 invoice for Campus Town environmental services.
• $11,732.50 to HOPE SERVICES for Maintenance services for the period of December 2025.
• $149,271.39 to MEYERS NAVE, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION for Professional legal services for Seaside Highlands and GPU Litigation through the periods of Sep-Dec 2025.
• $388,642.15 to JMS CEMENT CONTRACTORS INC for Professional construction services progress payment #3 for Eucalyptus Road infiltration unit repair project and progress payment #4 for PD parking lot renovation project. • $34,054.78 to JOSEPH A GOITIA for Professional construction services for the Fire Station No. 1 kitchen renovation for the period of September-November 2025.
• $685,425.00 to AMERICAN INTEGRATED RESOURCES INC for Professional demolition services for Phase 1b Fort Ord Demolition project through 12/31/2025.
• $14,000.00 to JOHN E ARRIAGA for Fees for professional services for the periods of Dec 2025-Jan 2026.
• $15,059.76 to AP ELECTRIC & GENERATORS LLC for Purchase of emergency Packet Page 13

Item No. 8.B. Page 3 of 5
generator/automatic transfer switch at public works corp yard. • $15,500.00 to GEOPHYSICAL IMAGING PARTNERS, INC. for Professional services for Watermaster geophysical surveys for the period of 03/06/2025 - 12/31/2025. • $10,000.00 to LSL, LLP for Professional services for GASP Implemenation Assistance - GASB 101 through 10/31/2025.
• $15,242.00 to LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES for 2026 Annual Membership Dues.
• $38,034.12 to MONTEREY CO. CONVENTION & VISITOR'S BUREAU for TID (Tourism Improvement District) remittance for the reporting period of November 2025 for the 13 Seaside motels/hotels.
• $46,310.86 to MONTEREY CO. SHERIFF-CORONER for Criminial Justice Information System for July 1, 2025 through September 30, 2025. • $13,475.27 to WALLACE GROUP for December 2025 Invoices for projects: Hilby Traffic Calming improvements, San Pablo Traffic Calming improvements and SCSD On-Call Broadway sewer prof svcs.
• $48,994.00 to MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MGMT. DIST. for 50% FY 2024- 2025 Annual Proportionate Share of Costs of CA Senate Bill 1383 Implementation activites.
• $60,586.08 to PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC for Collective accts for street lights, highway lighting, park lights and city office buildings. Service for the statement period of 11/22/25-12/23/25.
• $57,729.89 to U.S. BANK-CALCARD for City of Seaside purchase card transactions for the billing period of December 2025.
• $34,982.50 to HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. for Campus Town Phase 2 Demolition services for the period of 10/26/25-11/22/25. • $124,563.90 to HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. for Campus Town Phase 2 Demolition services for the period of 11/23/25-12/31/25. • $57,587.20 to VILLAGE PROJECT INC. for BSCC-Prop 47 Grant invoices for the period of September 2025.
• $59,217.58 to DON CHAPIN COMPANY, INC. for On-call engineering services for CIPP Lining of CMP pipes at Elm Ave & Noche Buena Rd through 12/31/2025. • $16,277.74 to MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT for Recycled water meter services for the period of December 2025.
• $27,360.00 to MONTEREY PENINSULA ENGINEERING for Professional construction services for the Lincoln-Cunningham arterial trails project through August 2025.
• $15,624.39 to TRAFFIC AND PARKING CONTROL CO., INC for Purchase of flashing stop sign for Broadway Avenue & Calaveras Street. • $11,433.00 to CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY for FY 2025-2026 pollution liability insurance program.
• $33,659.54 to CIVICPLUS LLC for Annual subscription fee for the period of 01/01/26-12/31/26.
• $110,005.21 to KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. for Professional services for Phase 2 Broadway Complete Streets for the periods of Oct-Dec 2025 and Packet Page 14

Item No. 8.B. Page 4 of 5
Intersection Control Evaluation project at Coe and Gen Jim through Dec 2025. • $89,775.00 to U.S. BANK ST. PAUL for City of Seaside joint powers financing authority lease revenue bonds (2006 Bayonet and Blackhorse Golf Course project).
• $12,755.24 to MONTEREY ONE WATER for SCSD prof. services for Lift Station Maintenance - soft starters replacement.
• $10,917.30 to STURDY OIL COMPANY for 2,000 gallons of regular gas (ethanol) and 1,000 gallons of clear diesel delivered to the public works department on 01/06/2026.
• $10,677.08 to HUNTINGTON PUBLIC CAPITAL CORP. for Lease contract payment for the Energy Project at City Hall, City Library, and Fire Department locations for the period ending 12/31/25.
• $22,595.98 to ENTERPRISE FM TRUST for Monthly payment for (21) leased City vehicles for the period of January 2026.
• $16,861.75 to RRM DESIGN GROUP for Professional architectural and engineering services for Fire Station 2 for the period of November 2025. • $108,482.50 to RRM DESIGN GROUP for Professional architectural and engineering services for Fire Station 2 for the period of December 2025. • $24,837.00 to MAZE & ASSOCIATES for City Audit services for fiscal year ending 6/30/2025.

The Net Payroll and Payroll benefits total was $4,003,419.38.

The remaining checks, totaling $572,873.92, include payments to vendors for operating expenditures.

The check report is available on the City's website here:
https://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/194/Check-Draft-Register

FISCAL IMPACT
There are no additional fiscal impacts.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Effective Accessible Governance

ATTACHMENTS
None
Packet Page 15

Item No. 8.B. Page 5 of 5
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 16

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.C.

TO: Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seaside FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Corryn Bennett, Accountant II
DATE: March 19, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVE AND FILE SUCCESSOR AGENCY CHECKS

BACKGROUND
In accordance with Government Code Section 37208, at each City Council meeting, the Council is provided a listing of the payroll and general checks issued since the last report so that it can inspect and confirm these checks. Each purchase has been reviewed and approved by the department making the purchase at the time of procurement. The invoice has been reviewed by the Finance Department prior to payment to ensure that it conforms to the approved budget.

A description of the checks and wires exceeding $10,000 are as follows:
• No checks exceeded $10,000.

The Checks report is available on the City's website here:
https://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/194/Check-Draft-Register
Packet Page 17

Item No. 8.C. Page 2 of 2

FISCAL IMPACT
There are no additional fiscal impacts.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Effective Accessible Governance

ATTACHMENTS
None
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 18

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.D.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Dominique Davis, City Clerk
Dan Meewis, Assistant City Manager
DATE: March 19, 2026
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROCLAMATION
RECOGNIZING APRIL 24, 2026, AS ARBOR DAY AND TO RAISE
THE ARBOR FLAG FROM APRIL 24–30, 2026

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution recognizing Arbor Day and to raise the Arbor Day flag from April 24 to April 30, 2026.

BACKGROUND
The City of Seaside is recognized as a Tree City USA community. To maintain this designation, the City must annually observe Arbor Day through official recognition, including the adoption of an Arbor Day proclamation, which is attached for Council consideration.

In addition, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommends that the Arbor Day flag be raised at City Hall beginning Friday, April 24, 2026, through Thursday, April 30, 2026, in recognition of Arbor Day and the City’s continued commitment to urban forestry.

Recognizing Arbor Day aligns with the City’s commitment to environmental stewardship and supports community efforts to preserve and expand Seaside’s urban tree canopy, which enhances neighborhood beautification, improves air quality, and contributes to a healthy and sustainable environment for residents.

FISCAL IMPACT
Packet Page 19

Item No. 8.D. Page 2 of 2
There is no fiscal impact.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Diverse and Inclusive Community

ATTACHMENTS

1. Arbor Day Proclamation 2026

2. Resolution Arbor Day
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 20
City of Seaside

PROCLAMATION
Arbor Day
April 24, 2026
WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees; and WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska; and
WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world; and WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce life-giving oxygen, and provide habitat for wildlife; and
WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires and countless other wood products; and WHEREAS, trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community; and
WHEREAS, trees, wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that, I, The Honorable Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor of the City of Seaside, California, on behalf of the City Council do hereby proclaim April 24, 2026 as “Arbor Day” in the City of Seaside, and I urge all citizens to celebrate Arbor Day and to support efforts to protect our trees and woodlands, and Further, I urge all citizens to plant trees to gladden the heart and promote the well-being of this and future generations.

Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
March 19, 2026
Packet Page 21
Meeting Date: 3/19/26
Item #: x.x.

RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

APPROVING TO RAISE THE ARBOR DAY FLAG ON
APRIL 24, 2026, AND FLY THROUGH APRIL, 30, 2026
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2021, the City Council designated a list of commemorative observances as codified by the Library of Congress; and WHEREAS, the City of Seaside adopted the Commemorative Flag Observances and Flag Policy on July 1, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the Arbor Day flag is not specifically identified in the City’s Commemorative Flag Observances and Flag Policy, and therefore authorization by the City Council is required prior to raising the flag; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission has requested the raising of the Arbor Day flag at City Hall beginning Friday, April 24, 2026, through Thursday, April 30, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seaside is recognized as a Tree City USA community, and to maintain this designation the city must annually observe Arbor Day through official recognition, including the adoption of an Arbor Day proclamation; and WHEREAS, flying the Arbor Day flag will further demonstrate the City’s commitment to environmental stewardship, urban forestry, and the preservation and expansion of Seaside’s tree canopy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Seaside hereby authorizes the raising of the Arbor Day flag at City Hall beginning Friday, April 24, Packet Page 22
2026, through Thursday, April 30, 2026, in recognition of Arbor Day and in support of the City’s continued efforts to maintain its Tree City USA designation.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 19th day of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

APPROVED:
______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 23

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.E.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Dominique Davis, City Clerk
DATE: March 19, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO CITY COMMISSIONS

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the appointment of Cathleen Pryor (Parks and Recreation Commission), Robert Ward (Planning Commission), Joy Anderson (C-JOBS), and Shannon Simpson (CJOBS).

BACKGROUND
The Mayor appoints members to the City's Boards, Commissions and Committees, which serve as advisory boards to the City Council. The purpose of the advisory boards is to supplement the City Council's skills and abilities to help guide the organization toward its mission. They also serve as an important link between the City Council and the Community by providing direct involvement in policymaking and communication of vital information.

The Mayor makes appointments to these advisory boards, while the City Manager designates Department Heads or other staff members to serve as staff liaisons that regularly attend meetings and provide technical support. All applicants have signed and submitted the Boards and Commissions Code of Conduct.

The Mayor has made the following appointments:

APPLICANT ADVISORY BODY
Cathleen Pryor Parks and Recreation Commission
Robert Ward Planning Commission
Shannon Simpson Commission on Jobs, Opportunities & Businesses in Seaside Packet Page 24

Item No. 8.E. Page 2 of 2
Joy Anderson Commission on Jobs, Opportunities & Businesses in Seaside

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Effective Accessible Governance

ATTACHMENTS

1. Appointee Application_Shannon Simpson

2. Appointee Application_Cathleen Pryor

3. Appointee Application_Robert Ward

4. Appointee Application_Joy Anderson
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 25
Application for Appointment to a City
Board/Commission/Committee
I'd like to serve on: Environmental Commission, Commission on Jobs, Opportunities & Businesses in Seaside
Name Shannon G Simpson
Email Address [email protected]
Address 1048 Amador Ave
City Seaside
State CA
Zip Code 93955
Phone Number 7604209299
Alternate Phone Number Field not completed.

I have been a resident of Seaside for over 8 years. I hold an M.S. in Nonprofit Administration (LSU–Shreveport), an M.A. in

Page 1 of 3 ends

file:///C:/Users/local_ddavis/Temp/XPgrpwise/697B4669COSIS_PO100134373614EE0C1... 1/29/2026 Packet Page 26 Please list your background,
education, experience, and
special skills:

Biology focused on conservation and community engagement (Miami University), and a B.A. from CSU Monterey Bay. I currently serve as the Executive Director of Monterey Audubon Society, where I oversee environmental education programs, habitat and bird conservation initiatives, volunteer coordination, community outreach, fundraising, and policy/advocacy work related to local ecosystems and climate resilience.

My background includes roles with the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History, Bird School Project, California State Parks, Happy Hollow Park & Zoo, and the Monterey Bay Aquarium. I have extensive experience in environmental education, coastal and watershed ecology, wildlife interpretation, communitybased conservation, grant writing, and public communication. I have also led sustainability projects such as waste audits, composting programs, and plastic reduction efforts.

I am a Certified California Naturalist and Project Learning Tree Educator, with skills in program development, policy review, stakeholder engagement, scientific communication, and basic conversational Spanish. My career has centered on
environmental stewardship and community awareness,
experiences I hope to contribute to Seaside’s environmental goals and Climate Action & Adaptation Plan.

Are you willing to file
Statements of Economic
Interest (Form 700)?
Yes
Are you able to attend
meetings during business
hours? (Most Boards and
Commissions meet after 5
pm)
Yes
Comments: I am deeply committed to supporting environmental stewardship in Seaside, where I both live and work. My
professional background has centered on making conservation actionable at the community level, and I am particularly interested in contributing to the City’s Climate Action & Adaptation Plan, local habitat protection, and environmental awareness initiatives. I bring a collaborative, solutions-oriented approach and would welcome the opportunity to support the City Council and staff in advancing Seaside’s environmental goals.

Electronic Signature
Agreement
I agree.

Electronic Signature Shannon Simpson

Page 2 of 3 ends

file:///C:/Users/local_ddavis/Temp/XPgrpwise/697B4669COSIS_PO100134373614EE0C1... 1/29/2026 Packet Page 27 Date 12/11/2025
Dear Applicant: As an employer with an Affirmative Action Program, we comply with Federal and State government record keeping, reports and other legal requirements. The completion of this data is voluntary and in no way affects your application to participate on any City Board, Commission or Committee. All data is kept in a separate confidential file by the Affirmative Action Office.

Name Shannon Simpson
Ethnic Origin

Page 3 of 3 ends

file:///C:/Users/local_ddavis/Temp/XPgrpwise/697B4669COSIS_PO100134373614EE0C1... 1/29/2026 Packet Page 28 Packet Page 29
Packet Page 30
Packet Page 31
Packet Page 32
Packet Page 33

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.F.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Dan Meewis, Assistant City Manager
Kee Hyon Higgins, Recreation Supervisor
DATE: March 19, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVE A MAYOR'S YOUTH FUND CONTRIBUTION REQUEST OF $3,000.00 FROM MONTEREY PENINSULA UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT TO ASSIST WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH
THEIR 2026 MPUSD UPCYCLED PROM CLOSET

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the request.

BACKGROUND
Monterey Peninsula Unified School District is requesting a donation of $3,000.00 from the Mayor's Youth Fund to cover the costs associated with their 2026 MPUSD Upcycled Prom Closet. This event is designed for youth ages 14 to 18 years and supports both Seaside and Central Coast High Schools within Seaside. It also supports Monterey and Marina High Schools. This annual event allows unduplicated student population (unhoused, fostered, and low income) access to this common rite of passage. It does this without highlighting or putting the financial reality their families or them as individuals on display. It teaches the importance of saving and the value of a hardearned dollar. It also exposes students to tasks such as event planning, fundraising, community service, styling, clothing mending and alteration and recycling. This event keeps clothing out of landfills and is actually in line with SB-707, the Responsible Textile Recovery Act of 2024. It shows that the school district and the local community care about the students. This event is also a great advertising opportunity and a tax write-off for local businesses. It also provides a fun volunteering opportunity for community members looking to give back to their community.

Based on the information in the application, the request meets the criteria for the Packet Page 34

Item No. 8.F. Page 2 of 2
Mayor's Youth Fund Policy. This has been approved by the MPUSD Superintendent. This is the first time that Monterey Peninsula Unified School District has requested a donation.

FISCAL IMPACT
This request would be funded by a donation from the Green Waste Recovery's donation to the Mayor's Youth Fund. The current balance of the Mayor's Youth Fund account (601-2106) is $26,122.20. If the City Council approves this request, the balance will decrease to $23,122.20. This is for fiscal year 2025/26.

In the event that all the funds in the Mayor's Youth Fund become exhausted, staff will keep a file of all applications. Once Green Waste issues the next round of funding, all applications on file will be processed at the next available City Council meeting.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Diverse and Inclusive Community

ATTACHMENTS

1. MYF Monterey Peninsula Unified School District - Upcycled Prom Closet 2026

2. Superintendent Approval - Monterey Peninsula Unified School District - Upcycled Prom Closet 2026
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 35
Packet Page 36
Packet Page 37
Packet Page 38
Packet Page 39
Packet Page 40
Packet Page 41
Packet Page 42
Packet Page 43
Packet Page 44
Packet Page 45
Packet Page 46
Packet Page 47
Packet Page 48
Packet Page 49
Packet Page 50
Packet Page 51
Packet Page 52
Packet Page 53
Packet Page 54
Packet Page 55
Packet Page 56
Packet Page 57
Packet Page 58
Packet Page 59

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.G.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Thomas Korman, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Leslie Llantero, Assistant Engineer
DATE: March 19, 2026
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF

THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM GRANT

APPLICATION FOR ADA TRAIL AND ABUTMENT

IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SAN PABLO BRIDGE

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize submission of the grant application.

BACKGROUND
The Active Transportation Program (ATP) is a competitive statewide grant program designed to increase walking and bicycling by funding projects that improve safety, mobility, and access for pedestrians and cyclists. ATP Cycle 8 is expected to provide approximately $574 million in funding from federal sources, State Senate Bill 1 (SB1), and the State Highway Account (SHA). Funding is anticipated to be programmed for fiscal years 2027/28, 2028/29, 2029/30, and 2030/31.

The San Pablo Bridge Demolition and Reconstruction Project (Project) previously received a federal appropriation of $850,000; however, additional funding is needed for improvements to the bridge abutments and the construction of accessible pedestrian and bicycle trail connections. In the previous ATP cycle, the City applied for $2.7 million in funding for this project. Although the Project was not selected for funding, the application received a high evaluation score, indicating the project is competitive and well aligned with the goals of the ATP program.

The San Pablo Pedestrian Bridge spans San Pablo Avenue between Yosemite Street and Mescal Street, connecting Manzanita Stuart Park and Lincoln Cunningham Park and Packet Page 60

Item No. 8.G. Page 2 of 3
providing direct access to the rear entrance of the International School of Monterey.

The bridge has historically served as an important Safe Routes to School connection, allowing students, families, and community members to travel between neighborhoods, parks, and schools without crossing high-volume vehicle traffic along San Pablo Avenue.

Due to structural deficiencies, the bridge has been closed since November 2022, forcing pedestrians and students to cross San Pablo Avenue at nearby intersections that experience high traffic volumes during school drop-off and pick-up periods. The proposed Project will demolish and replace the existing bridge and restore a safe, accessible, grade-separated pedestrian and bicycle crossing, improving safety while reestablishing a key multimodal connection within the community. The project is currently in the design phase.

Pursuant to the City’s Administrative Policy on Grant Management, all grant applications equal to or exceeding $10,000 require City Council approval. The policy requires the City Council to adopt a resolution that:

1. Approves the filing of the grant application;

2. Certifies the proposed project is consistent with the City’s General Plan goals and objectives;

3. Certifies that sufficient funds will be available to operate and maintain the project; and

4. Appoints the City Manager as the City’s authorized agent for the project.

The proposed Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan, specifically Goal M-3, which supports pedestrian facilities that connect land uses, address safety concerns, and advance land use and urban design objectives, and Goal M-7, which promotes a safe transportation system that eliminates traffic-related fatalities and reduces non-fatal injury collisions. By restoring a safe pedestrian and bicycle crossing along a Safe Routes to School corridor, the project advances the City’s goals of improving multimodal connectivity, pedestrian safety, and access to schools, parks, and neighborhoods.

FISCAL IMPACT
The San Pablo Bridget Demolition and Reconstruction Project is underfunded.

Submission of the grant applications will request full funds for the design and construction of the Project.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Community Safety & Quality of Life, Enhanced Physical Infrastructure & Abundant Water Supply
Packet Page 61

Item No. 8.G. Page 3 of 3

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 62
Meeting Date: 03/19/26
Item #.#
RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FOR ADA TRAIL AND ABUTMENT

IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SAN PABLO BRIDGE
WHEREAS, the Active Transportation Program (ATP) is a competitive statewide grant program intended to increase the use of active modes of transportation, including walking and bicycling, by funding projects that improve safety, mobility, and access for pedestrians and cyclists; and
WHEREAS, ATP Cycle 8 is expected to include approximately $574 million in funding from Federal sources, State Senate Bill 1 (SB1), and the State Highway Account (SHA), with funding programmed for fiscal years 2027/28, 2028/29, 2029/30, and 2030/31; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Administrative Policy on Grant Management requires City Council approval for grant applications equal to or exceeding $10,000, including adoption of a resolution approving the filing of the application; and WHEREAS, the San Pablo Pedestrian Bridge crosses San Pablo Avenue between Yosemite Street and Mescal Street, connecting Manzanita Stuart Park and Lincoln Cunningham Park and providing direct access to the rear entrance of the International School of Monterey, serving as an important connection for students, families, and park users; and
WHEREAS, the proposed San Pablo Bridge Demolition and Reconstruction Project (Project) will replace the structurally deficient pedestrian bridge and abutments and restore a safe, accessible pedestrian and bicycle connection, improving safety and supporting active transportation and Safe Routes to School access within the community; and
WHEREAS, the Project previously received a federal appropriation of $850,000; however, additional funding is required to complete the design and construction, including accessible trail connections and bridge abutment improvements; and WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan, specifically Goal M-7, which calls for a safe transportation system that eliminates traffic-related fatalities and reduces non-fatal injury collisions, and Goal M-3, which supports pedestrian facilities that connect land uses, address safety concerns, and advance land use and urban design objectives.

Packet Page 63
-2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside does hereby:

1. Approves the filing of a grant application to the Active Transportation Program (ATP) for the San Pablo Bridge Demolition and Reconstruction Project.

2. Certifies that the proposed project is consistent with the City’s General Plan goals and objectives.

3. Certifies that the City will have sufficient funds available to operate and maintain the project upon completion.

4. Authorizes and appoints the City Manager, or their designee, as the City’s agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests, and related documents, which may be necessary for the completion of the projects and administration of the grant.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 19th day of March 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor

ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 64

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.H.

THE REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM GRANT

APPLICATION FOR THE COE AVENUE AND GENERAL JIM

MOORE BLVD AND SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL INTERSECTION

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize submission of the grant application.

BACKGROUND
The Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Competitive Grant, administered by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County, provides funds for local roadway improvements, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, traffic safety enhancements, intersection upgrades, and corridor improvements. Projects must be consistent with an adopted local transportation plan or General Plan and be capable of completion within three years of receiving grant funds.

In 2019, the City of Seaside completed an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) study to evaluate high-priority intersections throughout the city and identify the most effective intersection control strategies, including roundabouts and other alternatives to traditional signalized intersections. The ICE provides a performance-based framework to guide engineering and investment decisions by comparing safety, operational performance, and cost-effectiveness.

The intersections of Coe Avenue at General Jim Moore Boulevard and Coe Avenue at Paralta Avenue were included in the evaluation. The study determined that roundabouts Packet Page 65

Item No. 8.H. Page 2 of 3
are the preferred alternative to the existing all-way stop controls at both locations due to their favorable benefit-to-cost ratios and operational advantages.

The Coe Avenue–General Jim Moore Boulevard and Seaside Middle School Intersection Improvements Project will improve pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular circulation along Coe Avenue and Paralta Avenue near the entrance to Seaside Middle School. The project proposes construction of roundabouts at both intersections, along with buffered bicycle lanes, sidewalks and multi-use paths, and ADA-compliant curb ramp improvements to enhance accessibility and safety.

1. Approves the filing of the grant application;

2. Certifies the proposed project is consistent with the City’s General Plan goals and objectives;

3. Certifies that sufficient funds are available to operate and maintain the project; and

4. Appoints the City Manager as the City’s authorized agent for the project.

The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan, specifically Goal M-3, which supports pedestrian facilities that connect land uses, address safety concerns, and advance land use and urban design objectives, and Goal M-7, which calls for a safe transportation system that eliminates traffic-related fatalities and reduces non-fatal injury collisions.

The project is also included in the City’s adopted Six-Year Capital Improvement Program, and City staff have actively pursued external funding opportunities for the project since 2020.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Coe Avenue–General Jim Moore Boulevard and Seaside Middle School Intersection Improvements Project is underfunded. Submission of the grant applications will request funds for the design and construction.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Enhanced Physical Infrastructure & Abundant Water Supply, Community Safety & Quality of Life

ATTACHMENTS
Packet Page 66

Item No. 8.H. Page 3 of 3

1. Resolution
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 67
Meeting Date: 03/19/26
Item #.#.

RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE REGIONAL SURFACE

TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE COE AVENUE

AND GENERAL JIM MOORE BLVD AND SEASIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Competitive Grant, administered by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County, provides funds for local roadway improvements, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, traffic safety enhancements, intersection upgrades, and corridor improvements; and WHEREAS, the City’s Administrative Policy on Grant Management requires City Council approval for grant applications equal to or exceeding $10,000 and requires adoption of a resolution approving the filing of the application; and WHEREAS, in 2019, the City of Seaside completed an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) study that evaluated high-priority intersections throughout the city to determine the most effective intersection control strategies; and WHEREAS, based upon the ICE, the intersections of Coe Avenue at General Jim Moore Boulevard and Coe Avenue at Paralta Avenue evaluations concluded roundabouts are the preferred alternative to the existing all-way stop controls at both locations due to their favorable benefit-to-cost ratios and operational advantages; and WHEREAS, the improvements at these locations will enhance pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle circulation along Coe Avenue and Paralta Avenue near the entrance to Seaside Middle School in addition to improve operations at Coe Avenue and General Jim Moore Blvd., regional corridor, which acts as an alternative route to Highway 1 providing access between Seaside, Del Rey Oaks and Monterey; and WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the City’s General Plan, specifically Goal M-7, which calls for a safe transportation system that eliminates traffic-related fatalities and reduces non-fatal injury collisions, and Goal M-3, which supports pedestrian facilities that connect land uses, address safety concerns, and advance land use and urban design objectives.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside does hereby:

Packet Page 68
-2

1. Approves the filing of a grant application for the Coe Avenue and General Jim Moore Blvd and Seaside Middle School Intersection Improvements Project under the Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Competitive Grant.

2. Certifies that the proposed project is consistent with the City’s General Plan goals and objectives.

3. Certifies that the City will have sufficient funds available to operate and maintain the project upon completion.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 19th day of March 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor

ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 69

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.I.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Andreas Baer, Assistant Public Works Director
Thomas Korman, Public Works Director/City Engineer
DATE: March 19, 2026
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF 2–5 YEAR-OLD PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT

AT LINCOLN CUNNINGHAM PARK FROM SPEC PLAY FOR
$165,778.77, PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY, FOR A TOTAL
AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $182,356.65

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the purchase and installation agreements.

BACKGROUND
Lincoln Cunningham Park Phase 1 - Arterial Trail Project is located in Lincoln Cunningham Park between Yosemite Street and Lincoln Street adjacent to San Pablo Avenue. The Project originally included construction of a concrete multi-use path through Lincoln Cunningham Park from San Pablo Avenue to Lincoln Street; pedestrian paths from the new multi-use path to Yerba Buena Court, Lindberg Court, and Serape Court; storm drainage improvements; curb ramp retrofits; sewer main repair; one onstreet accessible parking stall on Lincoln Street between Lincoln Cunningham Park and Havana Soliz Park; and seeding for erosion control. On January 2, 2025, the City Council approved adding additional scope of work to the project, including constructing underground utilities, additional site grading and storm water management, and pouring concrete for the central patio area, a 5-12 year old play area , and the 2-5 year-old play area.

At the January 15, 2026 City Council meeting the council approved the reallocation of funds for the installation of the 5-12 year old playground equipment, as well as the purchase and installation of an additional playground for children ages 2–5. Completion Packet Page 70

Item No. 8.I. Page 2 of 3
of these improvements would allow the Lincoln Cunningham Park Renovation Project to be fully delivered and opened for community use.

During the February 5, 2026, City Council meeting the council approved awarding a contract to JMS Concrete for the installation of the 5-12 year old play ground equipment. The installation should be completed by the end of April.

Staff reached out to multiple playground suppliers for the 2-5 playground and received five proposals, from four different suppliers as shown in the table below. All suppliers provided pricing for supply and installation of the equipment through cooperative purchasing organizations (Sourcewell, & Omnia) which the City is party to and has made purchases through in the past.

Playground Supplier Cooperative Purchasing
Org.

Base Bid
Miracle Play Sourcewell $ 140,856.37
Kompan (Option 1) Omnia $ 148,157.06
SPEC Play Sourcewell $ 165,778.77
Kompan (Option 2) Omnia $ 169,598.50
Game Time Omnia $ 181,629.58
On March 5th, 2026, the city council selected the SPEC Play proposal as the best fit for Lincoln Cunningham Park.

Council is now asked to authorize a resolution for $165,778.77 plus up to a 10% contingency, for the purchase and installation of 2-5 year old playground equipment for Lincoln Cunningham Park from SPEC Play using a Sourcewell cooperative purchasing agreement

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
Pursuant to preliminary review of the activities associated with this Council action in accordance with Section 15061 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, this project is Categorically Exempt (Class 1, Section 15301 Existing Facilities). The project includes the repair & replacement of playground equipment and application to the extent possible of the current standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (public health and safety standards).

FISCAL IMPACT
City Council approved a budget transfer at the 1/15/2026 council meeting (Council Item ID # 2026-32) transferring $250,000.00 from Short-Term Rental revenue funds from the Laguna Grande Park Synthetic Turf Project to the Lincoln Cunningham Park Improvement Project. This transfer provides adequate funding for the purchase and installation of the 2-5 year-old playground ($165,778.77) plus a 10% construction Packet Page 71

Item No. 8.I. Page 3 of 3
contingency.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Enhanced Physical Infrastructure & Abundant Water Supply, Diverse and Inclusive Community, Community Safety & Quality of Life

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 72
Meeting Date: 03/19/26
Item #: X.X.

RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING $165,778.77 PLUS UP TO A 10% CONTINGENCY, FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF 2–5-YEAR-OLD

PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT FOR LINCOLN CUNNINGHAM PARK FROM SPEC

PLAY USING A SOURCEWELL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WHEREAS, On January 30th, 2023 the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing a professional services agreement with Whitson Engineers to prepare concept plans for Lincoln Cunningham and Havana Soliz Parks; and,
WHEREAS, On June 1st 2023, the City Council authorized an amendment for the concept plan by Whitson Engineers for Lincoln Cunningham and Havana Soliz Parks for additional community outreach events in the amount of $18,600; and,
WHEREAS, November 2nd, 2023 the City Council approved a resolution adopting the Lincoln Cunningham and Havana Soliz Park Conceptual Master Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Lincoln Cunningham Park Basketball Court Improvements Project was adopted in the fiscal year 2022/2023 annual budget; and, WHEREAS, the Lincoln Cunningham Park Phase 1 - Arterial Trail Project was adopted in the fiscal year 2023/2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) annual budget to begin implementation of the concept plans for Lincoln Cunningham and Havana Soliz Parks; and, WHEREAS, July 10th, 2024 bids were received for the Lincoln Cunningham Park (Phase 1 - Arterial Trail Project) and the low bid was substantially lower than the engineers estimate and available budget; and,
WHEREAS, July 25th, 2024 the City Council adopted a resolution approving the plans and specifications for Lincoln Cunningham Park Phase 1 - Arterial Trail Project and awarding a construction agreement to Monterey Peninsula Engineering (MPE); and, WHEREAS, November 7th, 2024 the City Council adopted a resolution amending the Lincoln Cunningham Design Contract adding additional design scope; and, WHEREAS, November 21st, 2024, Council appropriated $160,000.00 of NIC money toward Lincoln Cunningham Park playground equipment; and, WHEREAS, Staff identified funding from project surplus’s in various current CIP projects and Transportation Agency Monterey County funds; and,
Packet Page 73
Meeting Date: 03/19/26
Item #: X.X.

WHEREAS, January 16th, 2025 The council approved additional scope of work for the Lincoln Cunningham Park (Phase 1 Arterial trail project) including underground utilities, concrete, and the 5-12 year old playground; and,
WHEREAS, May 15thth, 2025 The council approved the purchase of playground equipment for an amount not to exceed $326,835.66; and, WHEREAS, January 15th, 2026 the council approved a budget transfer of $250,000 for the installation for the 5-12 year old playground and for the purchase and installation of the 2-5 year old playground; and,
WHEREAS, February 5th, 2026, council awarded a construction contract to JMS Cement for $61,725 for the installation of the 5-12 year old playground equipment; and, WHEREAS, March 5th, 2026 council reviewed five proposals and selected the proposal from SPEC Play for the 2-5 year old playground; and,
WHEREAS, Pursuant to preliminary review of the activities associated with this Council action in accordance with Section 15061 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, this project is Categorically Exempt (Class 1, Section 15301 Existing Facilities). The project includes the repair & replacement of playground equipment, and to the extent possible the application of current standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (public health and safety standards).

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside adopt a resolution authorizing $165,778.77 plus up to a 10% contingency for the purchase and installation of the 2-5-year-old play ground; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside directs the Finance Director to make changed or funding transfers as necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular City Council meeting of the City of Seaside duly held on the 19th day of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor

ATTEST:
______________________________
Packet Page 74
Meeting Date: 03/19/26
Item #: X.X.

Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 75

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 8.J.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Andreas Baer, Assistant Public Works Director
Kirstin van Gend, Administrative Analyst II
Leslie Llantero, Assistant Engineer
Thomas Korman, Public Works Director/City Engineer
DATE: March 19, 2026
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2026 PAVING IMPROVEMENTS ON-CALL CONTRACT;

AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS TO THE TWO

LOWEST RESPONSIVE, RESPONSIBLE BIDDERS, DON CHAPIN
CO., INC. AND QA CONSTRUCTORS, INC.; AND AUTHORIZING
AN ANNUAL NOT-TO-EXCEED FUNDING LIMIT OF $2,000,000

RECOMMENDATION
Approve contracts.

BACKGROUND
On November 21st, 2024, the City Council authorized staff to utilize multiple on call construction contracts. On call construction contracts are efficient means to construct emergency work and capital improvement projects in a timely and cost-effective manner. On December 31st, 2025 staff advertised the FYE 2026 Paving Improvements On Call Contract for bid.

Although the quantity of work cannot be well-defined at the outset of an annual On-Call contract, the type of work can be defined. The low bid public bidding process required contractors to provide unit pricing, labor rates, markups, and pricing schedules that establish clear unit costs for itemized and otherwise well-defined types of work anticipated-throughout the year.

Packet Page 76

Item No. 8.J. Page 2 of 7
To ensure the City has a readily available work force the bid was advertised for multiple on call contracts where individual work orders were offered first to the low bidder who will be entitled to perform the work unless the contractor declines the project, or the City determines the Contractor would be unable to timely and satisfactorily perform the work due to bidder responsibility factors established by the City including, but not limited to, adequate financial, material, equipment, facility, workforce and personnel resources. Upon such determination by the City, the project shall be offered next to the second low bidder.

The FYE 2026 Paving Improvements On Call Contract established a not-to-exceed limit of $2,000,000.00. The limit intention is to use this contract for medium to large paving jobs within the City of Seaside. Individual Work Orders shall be for pavement areas no less than 15,000 SF of surface area.

Bids for the FYE 2026 Paving Improvements On Call Contract were received on February 27th, 2026. Five (5) bids were received electronically through the PlanetBids, the City of Seasides Online bidding platform, from the following contractors:

Contractor Grand Total Bid
The Don Chapin Co. Inc. $2,031,884.00
QA Constructors, Inc. $2,050,985.00
A. Teichert & Son $2,244,766.50
Monterey Peninsula Engineering $2,699,490.00
JMS Cement $14,891,937.00
The award of the contract is based upon the lowest responsive, responsible bid comparing the contractors grand total bid amounts. The Don Chapin Co, Inc. is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, with a bid of $2,031,884.00. QA Constructors, Inc. is the second low bidder with a grand total bid of $2,050,985.00. Staff reviewed both bids and determined them to be responsive, and that the bidders and subcontractors have the necessary qualifications, and experience level to satisfactorily perform all work within the project scope. Staff is recommending to award FYE 2026 paving improvements on call contracts to the first low bidder The Don Chapin Co, Inc. and the second low bidder QA Constructors Inc. each for annual not-to-exceed $2,000,000.00.

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
Award of an On Call contract with out defined work does not have a direct physical effect and is therefor excluded under CEQA. for work completed under this on call contract, this staff report establishes a list of categorical exemptions from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) defining specific activities that fall within each class of exemptions set forth in Article 19 of the CEQA Guidelines. Projects consistent with the letter and intent of the exemptions expressed in such classes as defined herein are exempt when performed under this on call contract. All non-exempt projects shall undergo further environmental review with their findings and mitigations subject to City Council review and approval. Categorical exemptions are to be applied only where projects have not already been excluded from CEQA on some other basis. Projects that have no physical effects, or that involve only ministerial government action, are excluded.

The classes set forth in CEQA guidelines sections 15301 - 15332 are identified under the bold headings below, and explained for these exemptions as they apply to on call work in Seaside, Sand City, Del Rey Oaks, or the Presidio of Monterey including former Fort Ord areas.

Item No. 8.J. Page 3 of 7
utility line under a downtown landscaped parcel may be significant, if it is in a particularly sensitive or hazardous area such as Seaside East in former Fort Ord lands with maritime chaparral and endangers, listed, or special significance species. Therefor classes will not apply where the project may impact an areas of special significance that has been designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, states or local agencies, and these classes are marked with an asterisk (*). In addition all classes of exemptions are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type and/or in the same place over time are significant. Finally, exemptions shall not be applied in the following circumstances: (1) A categorical exemption shall not apply for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway; (2) A categorical exemption shall not apply for a project located on a site which is included on any list of hazardous waste sites compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code; (3) A categorical exemption shall also not apply for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

CLASS 1: Existing Facilities
Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing. Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances.
(b) Existing facilities of both investor and publicly-owned utilities used to provide electric power, natural gas, sewerage, or other public utility services. (c) Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities (this includes road grading for the purpose of public safety). (d) Restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated or damaged structures, facilities, or mechanical equipment to meet current standards of public health and safety, unless it is determined that the damage was substantial and resulted from an environmental hazard such as earthquake, landslide, or flood.
(e) Additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than:
(1) 50 percent of the floor area of the structures before the addition, or 2,500 square feet, whichever is less; or
(2) 10,000 square feet if:
(A) The project is in an area where all public services and facilities are available to allow for maximum development permissible in the General Plan and (B) The area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. (f) Addition of safety or health protection devices for use during construction of or in conjunction with existing structures, facilities, or mechanical equipment, or topographical features including navigational devices.
(g) New copy on existing on- and off-premise signs.
(h) Maintenance of existing landscaping, native growth, and water supply reservoirs (excluding the use of economic poisons, as defined in Division 7, Chapter 2, California Agricultural Code). (i) Division of existing multiple-family or single-family residences into common-interest ownership and subdivision of existing commercial or industrial buildings, where no physical changes occur which are not otherwise exempt.
(j) Minor repairs and alterations to existing dams and appurtenant structures under the supervision of the Department of Water Resources.
(k) Conversion of a single-family residence to office use. (l) Use of a single-family residence as a small family day care home, as defined in Section 1596.78 of the Health and Safety Code.

Packet Page 78

Item No. 8.J. Page 4 of 7
CLASS 2: REPLACEMENT OR RECONSTRUCTION
Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Replacement or reconstruction of existing schools and hospitals to provide earthquake-resistant structures which do not increase capacity more than 50 percent. (b) Replacement of a commercial structure with a new structure of substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity.
(c) Replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems and/or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity.
(d) Conversion of overhead electric utility distribution system facilities to underground including connection to existing overhead electric utility distribution lines where the surface is restored to the condition existing prior to the undergrounding.
* CLASS 3: NEW CONSTRUCTION OR CONVERSION OF SMALL STRUCTURES Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. The numbers of structures described in this section are the maximum allowable on any legal parcel. Examples of this exemption include but are not limited to:
(a) One single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. (b) A duplex or similar multi-family residential structure totaling no more than four dwelling units. In urbanized areas, this exemption applies to apartments, duplexes, and similar structures designed for not more than six dwelling units.
(c) A store, motel, office, restaurant and/or similar small commercial structures not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances, and not exceeding 2,500 square feet in floor area.

In urbanized areas, the exemption also applies to up to four such commercial buildings not exceeding 10,000 square feet in floor area on sites zoned for such use, if not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances where all necessary public services and facilities are available and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive. (d) Water main, sewage, electrical, gas, and other utility extensions, including street improvements, of reasonable length to serve such construction.
(e) Accessory (appurtenant) structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools, and fences.
* CLASS 4: MINOR ALTERATIONS TO LAND
Class 4 consists of minor public or private alterations in the condition of land, water, and/or vegetation which do not involve removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees except for forestry and agricultural purposes. Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Grading on land with a slope of less than 10 percent, except that grading shall not be exempt in a waterway, in any wetland, in an officially designated (by federal, state, or local government action) scenic area, or in officially mapped areas of severe geologic hazard such as an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or within an Official Seismic Hazard Zone, as delineated by the State Geologist.
(b) New gardening or landscaping, including the replacement of existing conventional landscaping with water-efficient or fire-resistant landscaping.
(c) Filling of earth into previously excavated land with material compatible with the natural features of the site.
(d) Minor alterations in land, water, and vegetation on existing officially designated wildlife management areas or fish production facilities which result in improvement of habitat for fish and wildlife resources or greater fish production.
(e) Minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment, Packet Page 79

Item No. 8.J. Page 5 of 7
including carnivals, sales of Christmas trees, etc.
(f) Minor trenching and backfilling where the surface is restored. (g) Maintenance dredging where the spoil is deposited in a spoil area authorized by all applicable state and federal regulatory agencies.
(h) The creation of bicycle lanes on existing rights-of-way. (i) Fuel management activities within 30 feet of structures to reduce the volume of flammable vegetation, provided that the activities will not result in the taking of endangered, rare, or threatened plant or animal species or significant erosion and sedimentation of surface waters. This exemption shall apply to fuel management activities within 100 feet of a structure if the public agency having fire protection responsibility for the area has determined that 100 feet of fuel clearance is required due to extra hazardous fire conditions.

CLASS 7: ACTIONS BY REGULATORY AGENCIES FOR PROTECTION OF NATURAL

RESOURCES
Class 7 consists of actions taken by regulatory agencies as authorized by state law or local ordinance to assure the maintenance, restoration, or enhancement of a natural resource where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. Examples include but are not limited to wildlife preservation activities of the State Department of Fish and Game. Construction activities are not included in this exemption.

CLASS 8: ACTIONS BY REGULATORY AGENCIES FOR PROTECTION OF THE

ENVIRONMENT
Class 8 consists of actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. Construction activities and relaxation of standards allowing environmental degradation are not included in this exemption.

CLASS 9: INSPECTIONS
Class 9 consists of activities limited entirely to inspection, to check for performance of an operation, or quality, health, or safety of a project, including related activities such as inspection for possible mislabeling, misrepresentation, or adulteration of products. * CLASS 11: ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Class 11 consists of construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to:
(a) On-premise signs.
(b) Small parking lots.
(c) Placement of seasonal or temporary use items such as lifeguard towers, mobile food units, portable restrooms, or similar items in generally the same locations from time to time in publicly owned parks, stadiums, or other facilities designed for public use.

CLASS 23: NORMAL OPERATIONS OF FACILITIES FOR PUBLIC GATHERINGS Class 23 consists of the normal operations of existing facilities for public gatherings for which the facilities were designed, where there is a past history of the facility being used for the same or similar kind of purpose. For the purposes of this section, "past history" shall mean that the same or similar kind of activity has been occurring for at least three years and that there is a reasonable expectation that the future occurrence of the activity would not represent a change in the operation of the facility. Facilities included within this exemption include, but are not limited to, racetracks, stadiums, convention centers, auditoriums, amphitheaters, planetariums, swimming pools, and amusement parks.

CLASS 29: COGENERATION PROJECTS AT EXISTING FACILITIES
Class 29 consists of the installation of cogeneration equipment with a capacity of 50 megawatts or Packet Page 80

Item No. 8.J. Page 6 of 7
less at existing facilities meeting the conditions described in this section. (a) At existing industrial facilities, the installation of cogeneration facilities will be exempt where it will:
(1) Result in no net increases in air emissions from the industrial facility, or will produce emissions lower than the amount that would require review under the new source review rules applicable in the county, and
(2) Comply with all applicable state, federal, and local air quality laws. (b) At commercial and industrial facilities, the installation of cogeneration facilities will be exempt if the installation will:
(1) Meet all the criteria described in Subsection (a),
(2) Result in no noticeable increase in noise to nearby residential structures, (3) Be contiguous to other commercial or institutional structures.

CLASS 30: MINOR ACTIONS TO PREVENT, MINIMIZE, STABILIZE, MITIGATE OR ELIMINATE

THE RELEASE OR THREAT OF RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE OR HAZARDOUS

SUBSTANCES
Class 30 consists of any minor cleanup actions taken to prevent, minimize, stabilize, mitigate, or eliminate the release or threat of release of a hazardous waste or substance which are small or medium removal actions costing $1 million or less. No cleanup action shall be subject to this Class 30 exemption if the action requires the on site use of a hazardous waste incinerator or thermal treatment unit, with the exception of low temperature thermal desorption, or the relocation of residences or businesses, or the action involves the potential release into the air of volatile organic compounds as defined in Health and Safety Code section 25123.6, except for small scale in situ soil vapor extraction and treatment systems which have been permitted by the local Air Pollution Control District or Air Quality Management District. All actions must be consistent with applicable state and local environmental permitting requirements including, but not limited to, air quality rules such as those governing volatile organic compounds and water quality standards, and approved by the regulatory body with jurisdiction over the site.

Examples of such minor cleanup actions include but are not limited to:
(a) Removal of sealed, non-leaking drums or barrels of hazardous waste or substances that have been stabilized, containerized and are designated for a lawfully permitted destination; (b) Maintenance or stabilization of berms, dikes, or surface impoundments; (c) Construction or maintenance of interim or temporary surface caps; (d) Onsite treatment of contaminated soils or sludges provided treatment system meets Title 22 requirements and local air district requirements;
(e) Excavation and/or off site disposal of contaminated soils or sludges in regulated units; (f) Application of dust suppressants or dust binders to surface soils; (g) Controls for surface water run-on and run-off that meets seismic safety standards; (h) Pumping of leaking ponds into an enclosed container; (i) Construction of interim or emergency ground water treatment systems; (j) Posting of warning signs and fencing for a hazardous waste or substance site that meets legal requirements for protection of wildlife.

Item No. 8.J. Page 7 of 7
plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
(c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
(e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

FISCAL IMPACT
The On Call construction contracts with Don Chapin Co, Inc. and QA Constructors, Inc. are Not-To-Exceed contracts for a cumulative two million dollars ($2,000,000) over a single calendar year. The contract sum of these contracts can not be well defined at the outset. Contractors are not at any time guaranteed work under this contract, and work is issued only under the sole discretion of the City. The contract sum may be zero dollars ($0.00) over a contract period.

Work under this contract will be issued under individual work orders as described in the Specifications. All work orders shall undergo a financial review by the Finance Director to ensure sufficient funds are available for the work. Work Orders require signed approval by the Finance department prior to issuance. Funding will be made through individual project budgets and/or facility accounts. Work Orders will not be issued unless adequate project funding is identified prior to issuance.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Effective Accessible Governance, Enhanced Physical Infrastructure & Abundant Water Supply, Community Safety & Quality of Life

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 82
Meeting Date: 03/19/26
Item #: X.X.

RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE APPROVING THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FYE 2026 PAVING

IMPROVEMENTS ON CALL CONTRACT, AWARDING A NOT-TO-EXCEED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO THE TWO (2) LOW BIDDERS THE DON CHAPIN CO INC. AND QA CONSTRUCTORS, INC. WITH AN ANNUAL FUNDING LIMIT OF $2,000,000.00 AND DIRECTING THE DISTRICT ENGINEER TO

AUTHORIZE INDIVIDUAL WORK ORDERS
WHEREAS, November 21st, 2024 the City Council approved a resolution authorizing staff to utilize multiple on call construction contracts and directing staff to bid out general engineering and general building on call contracts for multiple on call contractors; and
WHEREAS, on call contracts for construction work will provide the City of Seaside (City) with a readily available work force for construction work and emergency response often saving time and money; and
WHEREAS, On December 31st, 2025 the City advertised the 2025 General Engineering On Call Construction Contract for bid; and
WHEREAS, The Don Chapin Co Inc. was determined to have the lowest responsive and responsible bid in the amount of $2,031,884.00; and WHEREAS, A. QA Constructors, Inc. was determined to have the second lowest responsive and responsible bid in the amount of $2,050,985.00; and WHEREAS, the basis of award for the FYE 2026 Paving Improvements on Call Construction Contract is determined by the lowest responsive responsible bid based on the grand total bid amount; and
WHEREAS, The Don Chapin Co Inc. and QA Constructors, Inc. have successfully demonstrated their qualifications by completing similar work projects; and WHEREAS, Award of this on call contract for work that is not yet defined has no physical effect and is excluded from CEQA; and
WHEREAS, Award of an On Call contract without defined work does not have a direct physical effect and is therefore excluded under CEQA. for work completed under this on call contract, this staff report establishes a list of categorical exemptions from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) defining specific activities that fall within each class of exemptions set forth in Article 19 of the CEQA Guidelines. Projects Packet Page 83
consistent with the letter and intent of the exemptions expressed in such classes as defined herein are exempt when performed under this on call contract. All non-exempt projects shall undergo further environmental review with their findings and mitigations subject to City Council review and approval. Categorical exemptions are to be applied only where projects have not already been excluded from CEQA on some other basis.

Projects that have no physical effects, or that involve only ministerial government action, are excluded.

Classes 3, 4, 11, and 32 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located. A project that would ordinarily be insignificant in its impact on the environment such as replacing a utility line under a downtown landscaped parcel may be significant, if it is in a particularly sensitive or hazardous area such as Seaside East in former Fort Ord lands with maritime chaparral and endangers, listed, or special significance species.

Therefor classes will not apply where the project may impact an area of special significance that has been designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, states or local agencies, and these classes are marked with an asterisk (*). In addition, all classes of exemptions are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type and/or in the same place over time are significant. Finally, exemptions shall not be applied in the following circumstances: (1) A categorical exemption shall not apply for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway; (2) A categorical exemption shall not apply for a project located on a site which is included on any list of hazardous waste sites compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code; (3) A categorical exemption shall also not apply for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

CLASS 1: Existing Facilities
Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing. Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances.
(b) Existing facilities of both investor and publicly-owned utilities used to provide electric power, natural gas, sewerage, or other public utility services. (c) Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities (this includes road grading for the purpose of public safety). (d) Restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated or damaged structures, facilities, or Packet Page 84
mechanical equipment to meet current standards of public health and safety, unless it is determined that the damage was substantial and resulted from an environmental hazard such as earthquake, landslide, or flood.
(e) Additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than:
(1) 50 percent of the floor area of the structures before the addition, or 2,500 square feet, whichever is less; or
(2) 10,000 square feet if:
(A) The project is in an area where all public services and facilities are available to allow for maximum development permissible in the General Plan and (B) The area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. (f) Addition of safety or health protection devices for use during construction of or in conjunction with existing structures, facilities, or mechanical equipment, or topographical features including navigational devices.
(g) New copy on existing on- and off-premise signs.
(h) Maintenance of existing landscaping, native growth, and water supply reservoirs (excluding the use of economic poisons, as defined in Division 7, Chapter 2, California Agricultural Code).
(i) Division of existing multiple-family or single-family residences into common-interest ownership and subdivision of existing commercial or industrial buildings, where no physical changes occur which are not otherwise exempt.
(j) Minor repairs and alterations to existing dams and appurtenant structures under the supervision of the Department of Water Resources.
(k) Conversion of a single-family residence to office use. (l) Use of a single-family residence as a small family day care home, as defined in Section 1596.78 of the Health and Safety Code.

CLASS 2: REPLACEMENT OR RECONSTRUCTION
Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Replacement or reconstruction of existing schools and hospitals to provide earthquake-resistant structures which do not increase capacity more than 50 percent. (b) Replacement of a commercial structure with a new structure of substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity.
(c) Replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems and/or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity.
(d) Conversion of overhead electric utility distribution system facilities to underground including connection to existing overhead electric utility distribution lines where the surface is restored to the condition existing prior to the undergrounding. * CLASS 3: NEW CONSTRUCTION OR CONVERSION OF SMALL STRUCTURES Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and Packet Page 85
the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. The numbers of structures described in this section are the maximum allowable on any legal parcel. Examples of this exemption include but are not limited to:
(a) One single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption.
(b) A duplex or similar multi-family residential structure totaling no more than four dwelling units. In urbanized areas, this exemption applies to apartments, duplexes, and similar structures designed for not more than six dwelling units. (c) A store, motel, office, restaurant and/or similar small commercial structures not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances, and not exceeding 2,500 square feet in floor area. In urbanized areas, the exemption also applies to up to four such commercial buildings not exceeding 10,000 square feet in floor area on sites zoned for such use, if not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances where all necessary public services and facilities are available and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive.
(d) Water main, sewage, electrical, gas, and other utility extensions, including street improvements, of reasonable length to serve such construction. (e) Accessory (appurtenant) structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools, and fences.
* CLASS 4: MINOR ALTERATIONS TO LAND
Class 4 consists of minor public or private alterations in the condition of land, water, and/or vegetation which do not involve removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees except for forestry and agricultural purposes. Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Grading on land with a slope of less than 10 percent, except that grading shall not be exempt in a waterway, in any wetland, in an officially designated (by federal, state, or local government action) scenic area, or in officially mapped areas of severe geologic hazard such as an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or within an Official Seismic Hazard Zone, as delineated by the State Geologist.
(b) New gardening or landscaping, including the replacement of existing conventional landscaping with water-efficient or fire-resistant landscaping. (c) Filling of earth into previously excavated land with material compatible with the natural features of the site.
(d) Minor alterations in land, water, and vegetation on existing officially designated wildlife management areas or fish production facilities which result in improvement of habitat for fish and wildlife resources or greater fish production. (e) Minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment, including carnivals, sales of Christmas trees, etc. (f) Minor trenching and backfilling where the surface is restored. (g) Maintenance dredging where the spoil is deposited in a spoil area authorized by all applicable state and federal regulatory agencies.
(h) The creation of bicycle lanes on existing rights-of-way. (i) Fuel management activities within 30 feet of structures to reduce the volume of Packet Page 86
flammable vegetation, provided that the activities will not result in the taking of endangered, rare, or threatened plant or animal species or significant erosion and sedimentation of surface waters. This exemption shall apply to fuel management activities within 100 feet of a structure if the public agency having fire protection responsibility for the area has determined that 100 feet of fuel clearance is required due to extra hazardous fire conditions.

CLASS 7: ACTIONS BY REGULATORY AGENCIES FOR PROTECTION OF

NATURAL RESOURCES
Class 7 consists of actions taken by regulatory agencies as authorized by state law or local ordinance to assure the maintenance, restoration, or enhancement of a natural resource where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. Examples include but are not limited to wildlife preservation activities of the State Department of Fish and Game. Construction activities are not included in this exemption.

CLASS 8: ACTIONS BY REGULATORY AGENCIES FOR PROTECTION OF THE

CLASS 23: NORMAL OPERATIONS OF FACILITIES FOR PUBLIC GATHERINGS Class 23 consists of the normal operations of existing facilities for public gatherings for which the facilities were designed, where there is a past history of the facility being used for the same or similar kind of purpose. For the purposes of this section, "past history" shall mean that the same or similar kind of activity has been occurring for at least three years and that there is a reasonable expectation that the future occurrence Packet Page 87
of the activity would not represent a change in the operation of the facility. Facilities included within this exemption include, but are not limited to, racetracks, stadiums, convention centers, auditoriums, amphitheaters, planetariums, swimming pools, and amusement parks.

CLASS 29: COGENERATION PROJECTS AT EXISTING FACILITIES
Class 29 consists of the installation of cogeneration equipment with a capacity of 50 megawatts or less at existing facilities meeting the conditions described in this section. (a) At existing industrial facilities, the installation of cogeneration facilities will be exempt where it will:
(1) Result in no net increases in air emissions from the industrial facility, or will produce emissions lower than the amount that would require review under the new source review rules applicable in the county, and
(2) Comply with all applicable state, federal, and local air quality laws. (b) At commercial and industrial facilities, the installation of cogeneration facilities will be exempt if the installation will:
(1) Meet all the criteria described in Subsection (a),
(2) Result in no noticeable increase in noise to nearby residential structures, (3) Be contiguous to other commercial or institutional structures.

CLASS 30: MINOR ACTIONS TO PREVENT, MINIMIZE, STABILIZE, MITIGATE

OR ELIMINATE THE RELEASE OR THREAT OF RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS

WASTE OR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
Class 30 consists of any minor cleanup actions taken to prevent, minimize, stabilize, mitigate, or eliminate the release or threat of release of a hazardous waste or substance which are small or medium removal actions costing $1 million or less. No cleanup action shall be subject to this Class 30 exemption if the action requires the onsite use of a hazardous waste incinerator or thermal treatment unit, with the exception of low temperature thermal desorption, or the relocation of residences or businesses, or the action involves the potential release into the air of volatile organic compounds as defined in Health and Safety Code section 25123.6, except for small scale in situ soil vapor extraction and treatment systems which have been permitted by the local Air Pollution Control District or Air Quality Management District. All actions must be consistent with applicable state and local environmental permitting requirements including, but not limited to, air quality rules such as those governing volatile organic compounds and water quality standards, and approved by the regulatory body with jurisdiction over the site.

Examples of such minor cleanup actions include but are not limited to:
(a) Removal of sealed, non-leaking drums or barrels of hazardous waste or substances that have been stabilized, containerized and are designated for a lawfully permitted destination;
(b) Maintenance or stabilization of berms, dikes, or surface impoundments; (c) Construction or maintenance of interim or temporary surface caps; (d) Onsite treatment of contaminated soils or sludges provided treatment system meets Title 22 requirements and local air district requirements; Packet Page 88
(e) Excavation and/or offsite disposal of contaminated soils or sludges in regulated units;
(f) Application of dust suppressants or dust binders to surface soils; (g) Controls for surface water run-on and run-off that meets seismic safety standards; (h) Pumping of leaking ponds into an enclosed container; (i) Construction of interim or emergency ground water treatment systems; (j) Posting of warning signs and fencing for a hazardous waste or substance site that meets legal requirements for protection of wildlife.

CLASS 31: HISTORICAL RESOURCE RESTORATION/REHABILITATION Class 31 consists of projects limited to maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation or reconstruction of historical resources in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and Grimmer. * CLASS 32: IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions described in this section.
(a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.
(b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
(e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside approves Specifications for the FYE 2026 Paving Improvements On Call Contract dated 1/2/2026; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Seaside City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute a construction agreement with The Don Chapin Co Inc. as the first low bidder for a total annual not-to-exceed of $2,000,000.00 with an option for two (2) additional one-year (1-year) extensions; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Seaside City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute a construction agreement with QA Constructors Inc. as the second low bidder for a total annual not-to-exceed of $2,000,000.00 with an option for two (2) additional one-year (1-year) extensions; and
Packet Page 89
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seaside directs the Public Works Director of the City of Seaside to authorize individual Work Orders under this FYE 2026 Paving Improvements On Call Contract.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular City Council meeting of the City of Seaside duly held on the 19th day of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor

ATTEST:
______________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 90

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 9.A.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Haroon Noori, Administrative Analyst II
DATE: March 19, 2026
SUBJECT: RECEIVE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE HOMELESS

COMMISSION AND ADOPT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PUBLIC

SERVICE PROGRAMS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES AND
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026-2027
AND 2027-2028

RECOMMENDATION

1. Receive the Homeless Commission’s recommendation regarding Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding allocations;

2. Approve funding allocations for CDBG public service programs and public facilities and infrastructure projects for Fiscal Years 2026-2027 and 2027-2028; and

3. Authorize staff to draft the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan and make it available for public review and comment for a period of 30 days.

BACKGROUND
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program is authorized under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. As an entitlement jurisdiction, the City of Seaside receives CDBG funds annually on a formula basis from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Historically, the City has used CDBG funds to support eligible public service programs and public facilities and infrastructure improvements that principally benefit low- and moderate-income Seaside residents.

Packet Page 91

Item No. 9.A. Page 2 of 8
HUD regulations require all CDBG funded activities to meet at least one of the three national objectives:
• Benefit low-and moderate-income (LMI) persons or households; • Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or • Meet an urgent community need.

HUD regulations also require the City to meet its goals and serve target groups as identified in its 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan which are outlined below:

Consolidated Plan Priority Populations:
• Extremely low-income and very low-income households
• Seniors
• Youth, primarily aged 16-17
• Persons needing ADA accessibility
Consolidated Plan Priority Needs:
• Access to community services (youth, senior services, and homelessness as priorities) • Provide quality facilities and infrastructure
• Improve accessibility for people with disabilities
• Preserve and improve existing housing stock
The Consolidated Plan is available on the City website: www.ci.seaside.ca.us/CDBG FY 2026-2028 NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY (NOFA)
The City administers CDBG funding through a two-year funding cycle. The FY 2026- 2028 cycle represents the second and third program years of the City’s 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan.

On November 10, 2025, the City issued a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) and Request for Applications (RFA) to solicit applications for fiscal years 2026-2027 and 2027-2028. The NOFA was also published in the Monterey County Weekly on November 11, 2025. A mandatory pre-proposal workshop was also conducted on December 10, 2025, to assist applicants with program regulations and project eligibility questions.

Packet Page 92

Item No. 9.A. Page 3 of 8

CDBG APPLICATIONS
In response to the NOFA, the City received a total of thirteen (13) applications, consisting of:
• Nine (9) public service program applications, and
• Four (4) public facilities and infrastructure improvement applications.

Applications were submitted through the City’s online grant portal at www.citydataservices.net. A summary of applications received is provided in Attachment A.

STAFF REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS
Pursuant to 24 CFR § 570.200(a)(2), the City is required to document eligibility determinations for all CDBG-funded activities. This includes review of national objective compliance, eligible activity classification, scope of work, and required supporting documentation.

City staff, with assistance from the City’s on-call CDBG consultant, completed a thorough review of all submitted applications and determined that each proposed activity is eligible for CDBG funding, subject to final environmental review and HUD compliance requirements.

REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS BY THE HOMELESS COMISSION
On February 4, 2026, the Homeless Commission received agency presentations to gain a clearer understanding of the proposed public service programs and public facilities and infrastructure projects.

Following the meeting, Homeless Commission members independently evaluated and scored each application using the CDBG Application Scoring Sheet and Evaluation Guide (Attachment B), consistent with the evaluation criteria outlined in the FY 2026-2028 NOFA.

In accordance with the NOFA, applications were required to achieve a minimum weighted score of 70 percent to be considered eligible for funding. All of the applications scored above this threshold and therefore qualified as being eligible to receive funding. City staff compiled and weighted the individual scores and calculated a weighted percentage score and overall ranking for each application. A summary of the Homeless Commission’s evaluation summary is provided below.

Packet Page 93

Item No. 9.A. Page 4 of 8
Applicant / Program or Project Category Total
Score
Weighted
Average
Weighted
%
Meals on Wheels of the Monterey
Peninsula - Home Delivered Meals
Public Service 510 102 97%
Legal Services for Seniors - Legal
Services for Seniors
Public Service 494 99 94%
International School of Monterey -
Mental Health Services
Public Service 458 92 87%
CASA of Monterey County -
Advocacy for Foster Youth
Public Service 490 98 93%
Gathering for Women - Casa de
Noche Buena Case Management
Public Service 473 95 90%
Greater Victory Temple - Youth
After School Program
Public Service 473 95 90%
Girls Inc. of the Central Coast -
Youth Development Services
Public Service 495 99 94%
ECHO Housing - Fair Housing
Services
Public Service 470 94 90%
The Village Project, Inc. - Youth &
Family Services
Public Service 502 100 96%
Boys and Girls Club - Clubhouse
Re-Roof Project
Public Facility 500 100 95%
Community Human Services -
Genesis and Elm Houses
Public Facility 478 96 91%
Meals on Wheels of the Monterey
Peninsula - Seaside Community
Kitchen
Public Facility 460 92 88%
Seaside Public Works - ADA Curb
Ramp Improvements
Public
Infrastructure
495 99 94%

FUNDING AVAILABILITY
As an entitlement jurisdiction, the City anticipates the following CDBG funding availability for the two-year funding cycle:

Packet Page 94

Item No. 9.A. Page 5 of 8
Funding Type/Source FY26/27 FY27/28
Anticipated CDBG Allocation $275,000 $250,000
Anticipated Program Income $256,750 $250,000
Prior Year CDBG Funds $49,250 -
Total $581,000 $500,000

KEY FUNDING PARAMETERS AND CONSTRAINTS
• Public Service Cap: HUD limits public service funding to 15 percent of the annual CDBG entitlement plus program income. Based on current estimates, the public service caps are approximately $79,762 in FY 2026-27 and $75,000 in FY 2027-28. • Program Planning and Administration: HUD allows up to 20 percent of CDBG funds for planning and administration.
• Public Facilities and Infrastructure: These projects are not subject to the 15 percent public service cap and may be funded using remaining CDBG balances.

HOMELESS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Homeless Commission met on March 4, 2026, to consider CDBG funding allocations for Fiscal Years 2026–2027 and 2027–2028.

To support the Commission’s discussion, staff presented three potential allocation approaches for distributing public service funds, each of which complies with HUD’s 15 percent public service funding cap. These options included equal distribution among all applicants, rank-and-fund based on scoring results, and score-proportional allocation. A summary of these options is provided in Attachment C for City Council reference. Staff did not advance a formal recommendation and instead presented these approaches as examples of common allocation methods used by the City in prior funding cycles.

After discussion, the Homeless Commission recommended a hybrid allocation approach that combines elements of both the rank-based and score-proportional methods. Under this approach, the two highest-scoring public service applicants, each of which received scores exceeding 500 points, would receive $12,000 per year. The remaining available public service funding would then be distributed among the seven remaining eligible applicants using a score-proportional method, based on the Commission’s evaluation scores.

This approach recognizes the highest-scoring programs while also ensuring that the remaining eligible applicants receive funding in proportion to their relative evaluation scores.

The combined score of the seven remaining applicants totals 3,353 points, and each program receives a share of the remaining funds proportional to its portion of that total. For example, Girls Inc. of the Central Coast, which received 495 points, represents Packet Page 95

Item No. 9.A. Page 6 of 8
approximately 14.8 percent of the combined score and therefore receives approximately

14.8 percent of the remaining available funds.

The Commission also reviewed staff’s proposed allocations for public facilities and infrastructure projects and program planning and administration and indicated support for those allocations as presented.

The Commission further recommended the following contingency approach if the City’s final CDBG allocation differs from current estimates:
• If funding increases or decreases, adjustments to public service allocations should be applied proportionally among the seven score-proportional programs, while maintaining the $12,000 annual allocations for the two highest-ranked programs. • If funding reductions are necessary within the public facilities and infrastructure category, adjustments should be applied to the ADA curb ramp improvement project, which can be implemented in phases.
• Program planning and administration funding may be adjusted proportionally as needed, while remaining within HUD’s 20 percent administrative cap.

The Homeless Commission’s recommended funding allocations are summarized in the table below.

Requested Recommended Agency / Program
FY26-27 FY27-28
Total
Score FY26-27 FY27-28
PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAMS (Subject to 15% HUD Cap)
Meals on Wheels of the Monterey
Peninsula – Home Delivered Meals
$12,000 $12,000 510 $12,000 $12,000
The Village Project – Youth &
Family Services
$12,000 $12,000 502 $12,000 $12,000
Girls Inc. of the Central Coast –
Youth Development Services
$12,000 $12,000 495 $7,980 $7,520
Legal Services for Seniors – Legal
Assistance Program
$15,000 $15,000 494 $7,980 $7,520
CASA of Monterey County –
Advocacy for Foster Youth
$12,000 $12,000 490 $7,900 $7,440
Gathering for Women – Casa de
Noche Buena Case Management
$12,000 $12,000 473 $7,590 $7,160
Greater Victory Temple – Youth
After School Program
$12,000 $12,000 473 $7,590 $7,160
ECHO Housing – Fair Housing
Services
$11,232 $10,800 470 $7,510 $7,080
Packet Page 96

Item No. 9.A. Page 7 of 8
International School of Monterey –
Mental Health Services
$12,000 $12,000 458 $7,212 $6,120
Public Service Subtotal $110,232 $109,800 $79,762 $75,000

PUBLIC FACILITIES & INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Boys & Girls Club – Clubhouse ReRoof Project$150,000 $75,000 500 $150,000 $75,000 City of Seaside Public Works –
ADA Curb Ramp Improvements
$250,000 $250,000 495 $250,000 $250,000
Community Human ServicesGenesis & Elm Houses
Improvements
$40,000 $40,000 478 $40,000 $40,000
Meals on Wheels – Community
Kitchen Improvements
$40,000 $40,000 460 $40,000 $40,000
Public Facilities &
Infrastructure Subtotal
$480,000 $405,000 $480,000 $405,000
PROGRAM PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (Subject to 20% Cap)
City of Seaside – CDBG Program
Administration
— — — $21,238 $20,000
Planning & Administration
Subtotal
$0 $0 $21,238 $20,000
GRAND TOTAL $590,232 $514,800 $581,000 $500,000

CONSOLIDATED FUNDING SUMMARY
Category FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28
Public Service Programs $79,762 $75,000
Program Planning & Administration $21,238 $20,000
Public Facilities & Infrastructure $480,000 $405,000
TOTAL CDBG FUNDS $581,000 $500,000

TIMELINE AND NEXT STEPS
• March 19, 2026 - City Council consideration
• March–April 2026 - 30-day public comment period
• April 16, 2026 - Tentative final City Council adoption • May 15, 2026 - Tentative HUD submission deadline
Packet Page 97

Item No. 9.A. Page 8 of 8

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
For purposes of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), budgeting actions alone do not constitute a project. Prior to commitment or expenditure of CDBG funds, staff will complete all required environmental reviews and certify compliance with applicable CEQA, HUD, and NEPA regulations.

FISCAL IMPACT
This action would result in the allocation of CDBG funds to numerous community organizations. Some, though not all, administrative costs would be offset by CDBG funds. It would be necessary to utilize some funds from the General Fund in the upcoming year’s budget in order to fund the administration of the CDBG funds.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Not Applicable

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A – FY2026-2028 CDBG Application Summary
Attachment B – CDBG Application Scoring Sheet and Guide Attachment C – FY2026-2028 CDBG Public Service Allocation Options Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 98
City of Seaside
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program
FY 2026-2028 NOFA and Application Cycle
Summary of Applications Received
Application
ID
Applicant Organization Program / Project Name Funding Category (Public Service / Facilities)
FY26-27 Requested
Amount ($)
FY27-278 Requested
Amount ($)
Total Project
Cost ($) CDBG Matrix Code CDBG National Objective Target Population Unduplicated Clients /
Beneficiaries
PS-01 Meals on Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula Home Delivered Meals Public Service $12,000 $12,000 $24,000 05A - Senior Services LMC Presumed Seniors 200 PS-02 Legal Services for Seniors Legal Services for Seniors Public Service $15,000 $15,000 $30,000 05C- Legal Services LMC Presumed Seniors 304 PS-03 International School of Monterey Mental Health Services Public Service $12,000 $12,000 $24,000 05O - Mental Services LMC Youth/Students 80 PS-04 CASA of Monterey County Advocacy for Foster Youth Public Service $12,000 $12,000 $24,000 05N - Abused and Neglected Children LMC Presumed Foster Youth 24 PS-05 Gathering for Women Casa de Noche Buena Case Management Public Service $12,000 $12,000 $24,000 05X - Housing Referral and Information Services LMC Presumed Homeless Women 16 PS-06 Greater Victory Temple Youth After School ProgramPublic Service $12,000 $12,000 $24,000 05D - Youth Services LMC Youth 120 PS-07 Girls Inc. of the Central Coast Youth Development ServicesPublic Service $12,000 $12,000 $24,000 05D - Youth Services LMC Youth 100 PS-08 ECHO Housing Fair Housing Services Public Service $11,232 $10,800 $22,032 05J - Fair Housing Activities LMC Households 150 PS-09 The Village Project, Inc. Youth & Family Services Public Service $12,000 $12,000 $24,000 05D - Youth Services LMC Youth/Families 75 PFI-01 Boys and Girls Club Clubhouse Re-Roof project Public Facility $150,000 $75,000 $225,000 03D - Youth Facilities LMC Youth PFI-02 Community Human Services Genesis and Elm Houses Public Facility $40,000 $40,000 $80,000 03- Public Facilities and Improvements LMC Substance Use Disorder Treatment PFI-03 Meals on Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula Seaside Community KitchenPublic Facility $40,000 $40,000 $80,000 03E - Neighborhood Facilities LMA Seniors PFI-04 Seaside Public Works ADA curb ramp improvements Public Infrastructure $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 03L - Sidewalks LMC Presumed Persons with Disabilities $590,232 $514,800 $1,105,032
Packet Page 99
Application
ID
Applicant Organization Program / Project Name Category FY26-27 Requested Amount ($)
FY27-278 Requested
Amount ($)
Project Description &
Scope (20)
Service Benefit
(30) Outcome (10) Administrative Capacity (20)
Budget & Cost
Narrative (20)
Bonus – Priority
Project (5)

TOTAL SCORE
(105)
Below 70?
PS-01 Meals on Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula Home Delivered Meals Public Service $12,000 $12,000 PS-02 Legal Services for Seniors Legal Services for Seniors Public Service $15,000 $15,000 PS-03 International School of Monterey Mental Health Services Public Service $12,000 $12,000 PS-04 CASA of Monterey County Advocacy for Foster Youth Public Service $12,000 $12,000 PS-05 Gathering for Women Casa de Noche Buena Case Management Public Service $12,000 $12,000 PS-06 Greater Victory Temple Youth After School Program Public Service $12,000 $12,000 PS-07 Girls Inc. of the Central Coast Youth Development Services Public Service $12,000 $12,000 PS-08 ECHO Housing Fair Housing Services Public Service $11,232 $10,800 PS-09 The Village Project, Inc. Youth & Family Services Public Service $12,000 $12,000 PFI-01 Boys and Girls Club Clubhouse Re-Roof project Public Facility $150,000 $75,000 PFI-02 Community Human Services Genesis and Elm Houses Public Facility $40,000 $40,000 PFI-03 Meals on Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula Seaside Community Kitchen Public Facility $40,000 $40,000 PFI-04 Seaside Public Works ADA curb ramp improvements Public Infrastructure $250,000 $250,000 CDBG APPLICATION SCORING – EVALUATION CRITERIA GUIDE
Criterion
Project Description & Activity Scope (20)
What to Look For (Plain Language)
How clearly the applicant explains what the program/project is, who is served, where it happens, and how it operates from start to finish.

Who benefits, number of unduplicated clients, outreach/intake/tracking methods, cost per client served, and how the activity meets low/moderate-income benefit requirements.

Specific outcome goals and how results will be measured (numbers and/or narrative). Shows alignment with a CDBG outcome (Availability/Accessibility, Affordability, or Sustainability).

Ability to manage CDBG: experience with similar/federal funds, staffing and roles, reserves/cash flow for reimbursement timing, financial controls, and procurement practices.

Budget is complete and reasonable; clearly explains what CDBG pays for, what other funds cover, and provides enough detail/justification for each line item (including personnel roles).

Award bonus only if the project clearly meets a City priority identified in the NOFA/Consolidated Plan as follows:

This ConPlan’s main target groups include:
* Extremely low-income and very low-income households
* Seniors
* Youth, primarily aged 16-17
* Persons needing ADA accessibility
The Strategic Plan’s priority needs include:
* Access to community services (youth, senior services, and homelessness as priorities)
* Provide quality facilities and infrastructure
* Improve accessibility for people with disabilities
* Preserve and improve existing housing stock
Service Benefit (30)
Outcome (10)
Administrative Capacity (20)
Budget & Cost Narrative (20)
Bonus – Priority Project (5)
Packet Page 100
HC Score
Item No. Agency Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2 1 Meals on Wheels of the Monterey
Peninsula – Home Delivered Meals $12,000 $12,000 510 $8,862 $8,333 $12,000 $12,000 $9,323 $8,766 2 The Village Project, Inc. – Youth & Family
Services $12,000 $12,000 502 $8,862 $8,333 $12,000 $12,000 $9,150 $8,604 3 Girls Inc. of the Central Coast – Youth
Development Services $12,000 $12,000 495 $8,862 $8,333 $12,000 $12,000 $9,064 $8,523 4 Legal Services for Seniors – Legal Services
for Seniors $15,000 $15,000 494 $8,862 $8,333 $12,000 $12,000 $9,064 $8,523 5 CASA of Monterey County – Advocacy for
Foster Youth $12,000 $12,000 490 $8,862 $8,333 $12,000 $12,000 $8,978 $8,442 6 Gathering for Women – Casa de Noche
Buena Case Management $12,000 $12,000 473 $8,862 $8,333 $9,881 $7,500 $8,632 $8,117 7 Greater Victory Temple – Youth After
School Program $12,000 $12,000 473 $8,862 $8,333 $9,881 $7,500 $8,632 $8,117 8 ECHO Housing – Fair Housing Services $11,232 $10,800 470 $8,862 $8,333 $0 $0 $8,546 $8,036 9 International School of Monterey – Mental
Health Services $12,000 $12,000 458 $8,862 $8,333 $0 $0 $8,373 $7,872 $110,232 $109,800 $79,762 $75,000 $79,762 $75,000 $79,762 $75,000 City of Seaside
CDBG Public Service Funding Allocation Options
FY26-28 Funding Cycle
Anticipated Public Service Funding:

FY 2026-2027: $79,762
FY 2027-2028: $75,000
Public Services (subject to 15% Cap) Subtotal
FY2026-2028
Funding Cycle Requests
Option 1 - Equal
Distribution
Option 2 - Rank-and-Fund
Until Exhausted
Option 3 - ScoreProportional Allocation
Packet Page 101

CITY OF SEASIDE

STAFF REPORT
Item No.: 10.A.

TO: City Council
FROM: Greg McDanel, City Manager
BY: Jessica Riley, Finance Director
DATE: March 19, 2026
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE ANNUAL MID-YEAR

FINANCIAL REPORT AND AMENDMENTS TO THE BUDGET AND
STREETS FUNDING POLICY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

RECOMMENDATION
Approve mid-year budget.

BACKGROUND
This item provides the City Council with an opportunity to review the Annual Operating and Capital Budgets as of mid-year and amend the budget as deemed necessary. The City's Finance Director will provide a presentation summarizing the mid-year financial report which is attached to the agenda item.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City's general fund fiscal year operating budget is projected to produce a surplus of approximately $1.8 million. Staff are requesting budget increases in the general fund of approximately $694 thousand. The proposed update to the Streets Funding Policy is primarily administrative and intended to manage the fund balance in street operations more transparently.

STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Effective Accessible Governance

ATTACHMENTS
Packet Page 102

Item No. 10.A. Page 2 of 2

1. Resolution

2. Q2 26 Report
Reviewed for Submission to the City Council by:

____________________________________
Greg McDanel, City Manager
Packet Page 103
RESOLUTION NO. 26-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE

ACCEPTING THE ANNUAL MID YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT AND ADOPTING

PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE BUDGET OF THE CITY OF SEASIDE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026, AND MODIFYING THE CITY’S STREETS FUNDING POLICY
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Seaside reviewed and adopted the 2025-2026 Annual Operating Budget in June of 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducts an annual mid-year review of the Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Seaside has conducted the mid-year review and reviewed the proposed changes to the FY 2025-2026 Annual Budget; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to approve changes to the 2025-2026 Operating Budget by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Mid-Year Financial Report recommends refining the City’s streets funding policy to align its methodology with the City’s Pension Funding Policy by estimating the actual available amount based on year-end operating results; and WHEREAS, the recommended policy refinement further clarifies that funding generated under the streets funding policy will first be applied to address any operating deficit in the City’s Street Maintenance Fund (Fund 210), with any remaining funds directed to pavement rehabilitation projects.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,

1. The City Council of the City of Seaside accepts the annual Mid-year Financial Report and adopts the proposed modifications to the 2025-2026 Annual Operating Budget, as detailed in the Mid-year Financial Report, attached, which may be modified and incorporated by staff, as authorized.

2. The City Council approves the modification to the City’s Streets Funding Policy, as described in the Mid-Year Financial Report, to:
• Estimate the funding amount based on actual year-end operating results, consistent with the methodology used in the City’s Pension Funding Policy; and
• Direct such funding first to address any operating deficit in the Street Maintenance Fund (Fund 210), with any remaining funds allocated to pavement rehabilitation projects.

Meeting Date: 3/19/2026
Item X.X
Packet Page 104

3. The City Council of the City of Seaside authorizes the City Manager to execute any contracts or contract amendments associated with any of the budget modifications approved by this resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Seaside duly held on the 19th day of March 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:
__________________________
Ian N. Oglesby, Mayor

ATTEST:
_____________________________
Dominique L. Davis, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM:
______________________________
Sheri L. Damon, City Attorney
Packet Page 105

Mid-Year FY 2025-26
Financial Report
(Unaudited)
Packet Page 106

CITY OF SEASIDE

1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2-3 General Fund FY 2025-26 Budget Recap………………………………………………………………............. 4 General Fund Revenues Summary ......................................................................................... 5-6 General Fund Expenditure Summary ..................................................................................... 7-9 General Fund Net Results ...................................................................................................... 9 Budget Requests .................................................................................................................... 10 Budget Outlook ..................................................................................................................... 12-15 Other Funds ........................................................................................................................... 16 Packet Page 107

CITY OF SEASIDE

2 INTRODUCTION
This is the second quarterly report for Fiscal Year 2025- 26, and comprises results for the six month period
ending December 31, 2025. While a few other notable
funds are reviewed, this report focuses primarily on the City’s general fund. General Fund operating revenues
and expenditures as compared to previous years
alongside the budgeted amounts, and any notable
changes or trends in these numbers are explained. The
report is presented on a cash basis, which means that
revenues are recognized at the time revenues are
received and expenditures are recognized at the time
payment is processed. The City does not accrue any
revenues or expenditures in the first quarter.

The purpose of this report is twofold. First, it ensures that the City is consistently monitoring its revenues and expenditures so that it may proactively respond to
unanticipated changes or emerging trends. Second, and
equally important, consistent reporting increases the
transparency of the City’s finances. Quarterly reporting provides the City Council, City Administration, taxpayers and ratepayers with information that demonstrates the
City is meeting this standard.

The information in this report is the most accurate and up-to-date information available at the time of
publication. It is not meant to be inclusive of all financial and accounting transactions. It is intended only to
provide the Council, Management and the public with
an overview of the state of the City’s general fiscal
condition. It should be noted that this report is not an audited financial statement, and the numbers provided
herein are preliminary and subject to change as the year progresses. No data on revenues and expenditures is
final until the City has completed its annual audit and finalized its Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
(ACFR), which is released in the winter of each year for the prior fiscal year.

ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
The economic outlook section of this report provides an overview of key factors influencing the City’s financial outlook. Consumer spending remains steady but
increasingly value-driven, and business investment has
slowed in response to higher financing costs and policy uncertainty. While inflation cooled significantly earlier in 2025, recent data show modest upward pressure tied in
part to tariffs and input costs working through supply
chains.

Monetary policy remains a central focus. The Federal
Reserve reduced interest rates three times in late 2025 as inflation moved closer to its long-term target and
labor market conditions softened. However,
policymakers have signaled a cautious stance moving
forward, balancing moderating economic growth against
the risk of renewed inflation. Financial markets currently anticipate a measured and data-dependent approach in
2026.

Overall, the national outlook is stable but restrained, with continued expansion expected at a slower pace
than in recent years.

NATIONAL & STATE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
HdL (the City’s revenue enhancement consultant)
reports that the U.S. economy continues to expand at
a moderated pace, with real GDP growth projected at
approximately 2.3% in both FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-

27. • California’s unemployment rate has stabilized in the mid-5% range (approximately 5.4%–5.7%) and is
expected to improve modestly to about 5.5% next
fiscal year, indicating a cooling but steady labor
market.
• Statewide Sales and Use Tax growth is forecast at
roughly 1.7% in FY 2025-26, increasing to 2.6% in FY
2026-27, with stronger performance in online retail
and countywide pools offsetting softer results in
autos and construction-related sectors.
• California’s median existing home price is projected
in the $736,000–$739,000 range, reflecting modest
year-over-year growth of just over 1%, as limited
supply continues to support pricing despite weaker
sales activity.

Source: Hdl
Inflationary pressures have moderated significantly from their peak, though progress toward the Federal
Reserve’s long-term target has been uneven. After
cooling through much of 2024 and early 2025, recent
data indicate renewed price pressures, driven in part by tariff-related cost increases and persistent service-sector Packet Page 108

CITY OF SEASIDE

3 Q1 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT
inflation. This environment continues to test the balance between price stability and sustained economic growth.

In response to easing inflation earlier in 2025 and signs of a softening labor market, the Federal Reserve
reduced the federal funds rate three times in late 2025.

While financial conditions have improved, policymakers
have emphasized a cautious, data-dependent approach
moving into 2026, noting ongoing uncertainty
surrounding trade policy, global conditions, and the
pace of disinflation.

Economic growth has slowed but remains positive.

HdL’s California Consensus Forecast projects modest
U.S. expansion over the next two fiscal years as higher borrowing costs, slower hiring, and consumer caution
temper activity. California’s unemployment rate has
stabilized in the mid-5% range, reflecting reduced hiring momentum rather than significant layoffs. Despite
these headwinds, wage growth and household spending
have remained relatively resilient, supporting
continued, though more measured, economic
expansion.

LOCAL ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
Seaside’s local economy has reflected the broader
pattern of moderated growth and gradual stabilization
through the first half of Fiscal Year 2025-26. Following softness during FY 2024-25, recent activity has generally tracked within budget expectations, though
performance remains uneven across sectors as
households and businesses adjust to evolving economic
conditions.

Labor market conditions have improved modestly. The
City’s unemployment rate was approximately 3.3% as of
December 2025 (preliminary), trending downward from
a mid-2025 peak and remaining below state and national
averages. While hiring activity has slowed compared to
prior years, the local labor market remains relatively
stable.

Sales and use tax revenues, representing roughly 40% of the City’s General Fund revenues, continue to be closely monitored. Performance remains heavily concentrated
in the autos and transportation sector, which comprises the largest share of the City’s sales tax base. Although statewide data show modest stabilization in taxable
sales, new motor vehicle activity remains sensitive to
financing conditions and consumer confidence. The
closure of the Hyundai dealership at the Seaside Auto
Center underscores the City’s exposure to volatility
within this sector and highlights an ongoing
concentration risk.

Tourism-related revenues have shown improvement
compared to the prior fiscal year. Transient occupancy
tax (TOT) has stabilized and is trending near or slightly above expectations at mid-year, supported by steady
visitation and established regional events. Restaurant
activity has remained relatively solid, particularly in casual dining, while fuel-service stations and certain
retail categories continue to reflect cautious consumer spending patterns.

Overall, Seaside’s local outlook remains one of measured and uneven growth. While several key revenues are
performing within expectations at mid-year, the City’s
reliance on economically sensitive revenue streams,
particularly auto-related sales tax, warrants continued vigilance. Staff will continue to monitor trends closely and evaluate fiscal performance as part of the mid-year budget review process.

Source: Hdl
3Q25 Percent of Sales Tax
Packet Page 109

CITY OF SEASIDE

4 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT

GENERAL FUND
FY 2025-26 BUDGET RECAP:

In June 2025, the Seaside City Council adopted the FY 2025–26 Operating and Capital Budget during a period of slowing revenue growth and rising long-term cost pressures. At the time of adoption, the City was beginning the fiscal year with a negative unassigned General Fund balance, reflecting prior years where expenditures and one-time uses of fund balance outpaced recurring revenues. As a result, the adopted budget was structured with the goal of restoring structural balance over time while maintaining core services.

The adopted General Fund budget includes $48.3 million in operating revenues and $48.2 million in operating expenditures, producing a modest operating surplus of approximately $47,900. While the budget remains balanced on an operating basis, it includes the use of approximately $1.8 million of fund balance to support both capital and operational needs, including $615,000 for capital improvement projects and $1.16 million for street maintenance and operations. The use of fund balance for street maintenance operations, first implemented in FY 2024–25, is intended to be temporary while the City evaluates expenditure reductions and alternative funding sources.

Personnel costs remain the primary expenditure driver at approximately $36.1 million, or about 75% of General Fund expenditures. To manage these pressures, the budget incorporated expenditure restraint measures, including freezing 20 vacant positions, maintaining staffing levels below optimal service benchmarks, and reducing departmental operating requests by approximately $4.6 million.

FISCAL PATH FORWARD:

The adopted financial plan also reflects a shift in fiscal direction toward restoring long-term stability, emphasizing two key priorities: allowing revenues to gradually outpace expenditures through controlled spending and conservative revenue projections, and rebuilding and sustaining reserve levels while reducing reliance on one-time fund balance to support ongoing operations.

General Fund Changes in
Fund Balance:

Projected
Operating
New Funding
Streets
New Funding
Capital Total Budget
FY26 FY26 FY26 FY26
Revenues 48,255,056 $ - $ - $ 48,255,056 $
Fund Balance 1,164,543 $ 615,000 $ 1,779,543.00
Expenditures (48,207,179) (1,164,543) (615,000) (49,986,722) Adjusted Surplus/(Deficit) 47,877 $ - $ - $ 47,877 $
Projected June 30, 2026 Balance at time of Budget Adoption -$1,746,825 +$59,877
+$317,575 +$47,877
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Adoption Recap
Staff's Final Proposed Adjustments/Corrections:

Council Prioritized Changes:

Additional Reserve Requirements (a % of expenditures):
+$20,000 +$210,000
-$22,000 -$22,000
-$3,600 No Impact
Unassigned Fud
Balance
Operating
Surplus/Deficit
Starting Balance
Council Budget Decisions to Strengthen Fund Balance: +$2,070,000 No Impact Packet Page 110

CITY OF SEASIDE

5 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT
RESERVES:

At the time of budget adoption, reserve levels were initially projected to fall below the City’s 30% policy target.

However, following a strategic budget study session, the City Council approved deferring select capital projects and spreading the reduction of the street maintenance operating deficit over a two-year period, which improved projected reserve levels. As a result, the City’s reserve accounts were fully funded at the time the budget was adopted.

Since adoption, $325,000 has been released from capital reserves to address shortfalls in urgent capital project budgets.

Overall, the FY 2025–26 budget reflects a transitional fiscal year focused on stabilization, balancing near-term operational needs while beginning the process of restoring the City’s unassigned fund balance and maintaining healthy reserve levels.

Q2 GENERAL FUND REVENUES:

Through the second quarter of FY 2025-26, total General Fund revenues of $22.2 million are 3% ($724,000) above FY 2024-25 and 4% ($839,000) above FY 2023-24 for the same period. While collections are slightly below the 50% mid-year benchmark, full-year revenues are projected at $49.2 million, approximately $929,000 million above the adopted budget, reflecting stronger performance in several major categories.

Emergency Reserve - 15% (7,231,077) Special Reserve - 10% (4,820,718) Capital Reserve - 5% (2,410,359)
(14,462,154)
General Fund Revenues: Results:

Annual Q2 - 50% Q2 Year-End Vaiance vs.

Budget
FY26 FY26 FY26 $ % $ % FY26 $
Sales and Use Tax $ 19,957,780 $ 9,978,890 $ 8,681,926 $ 237,327 3% $ 396,279 5% $ 20,447,435 $ 489,655 Property Tax 6,679,111 3,339,556 3,638,193 389,294 12% 628,201 21% 7,271,121 592,010 Transient Occupancy Tax 4,090,386 2,045,193 2,199,852 341,416 18% 84,354 4% 4,510,648 420,262 Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 5,368,963 2,684,481 2,695,569 140,140 5% 300,436 13% 5,441,137 72,174 Utility User Tax 3,876,155 1,938,077 1,428,690 (12,541) -1% 218,395 18% 3,831,660 (44,495) Business License Tax 1,025,134 512,567 1,015,831 48,397 5% (35,464) -3% 1,084,991 59,857 Franchise Fees 1,109,542 2,219,084 654,366 71,278 12% 68,750 12% 2,074,812 (144,271) Marijuana Receipts Tax 769,600 384,800 153,908 (231,901) -60% (116,369) -43% 548,288 (221,312) Miscellanous-Other Revenue 890,639 411,701 158,672 (341,243) -68% (74,870) -32% 645,518 (245,121) Licenses & Permits 686,827 343,413 494,398 180,572 58% (112,488) -19% 912,392 225,566 Fees & Charges 843,965 421,983 468,153 104,803 29% 84,252 22% 841,764 (2,201) Grant Revenue 268,127 134,063 21,009 (139,187) -87% (584,558) -97% 21,009 (247,118) Income from Investments 1,018,861 509,431 354,250 (130,224) -27% (79,257) -18% 1,055,614 36,753 Other Agency Revenue 176,133 352,266 182,213 38,477 27% 61,731 51% 300,600 (51,666) Fines & Forfeitures 208,159 104,079 98,066 27,666 39% (136) 0% 197,513 (10,646) Transfer In - - - - n/a - n/a - - Revenues by Source $ 24,093,909 48,255,056 $ 22,245,095 $ 724,274 $ 3% 839,255 $ 4% 49,184,503 $ 929,447 $ Budget Projection Variances:

Year over Year Vs.

FY25
Year over Year Vs.

FY24
Packet Page 111

CITY OF SEASIDE

6 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT
DISCUSSION OF SIGNIFICANT REVENUE VARIANCES:
 Sales and Use Tax, the City’s largest revenue source, totaled $8.7 million through Q2, representing a 3% increase over FY 2024-25 and a 5% increase over FY 2023-24. While receipts remain below the 50% budget benchmark at mid-year, the year-end projection of approximately $20.4 million is nearly $490,000 above budget. Performance reflects modest stabilization overall, though results remain sensitive to activity in the auto sector, which continues to comprise the largest share of the City’s sales tax base.  Property Tax revenues of $3.6 million are up 12% year-over-year, benefiting from assessed valuation growth and increased Successor Agency pass-through distributions. Year-end property tax is projected to exceed budget by approximately $592,000.
 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) collections of $2.2 million are up 18% from the prior year and slightly above FY 2023-24 levels. Performance through mid-year reflects steady visitor activity and established regional events. TOT is projected to exceed budget by approximately $420,000 at year-end.

Other notable trends include solid growth in Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Tax (+5%), Business License Tax (+5%), Licenses & Permits (+58%), and Fees & Charges (+29%) compared to the prior year. Conversely, Marijuana Receipts Tax (-60%), Miscellaneous Revenues (-68%), and Grant Revenue (-87%) reflect timing differences and structural declines. Utility User Tax and Franchise Fees are trending slightly below budget at mid-year but remain within expected ranges.

Overall, General Fund revenues are performing slightly ahead of prior years and are projected to finish the fiscal year above budget. While concentration in economically sensitive revenues, particularly sales tax, continues to warrant close monitoring, mid-year results reflect stable and generally favorable performance relative to expectations.

Packet Page 112

CITY OF SEASIDE

7 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT
Q2 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES:

Total budgeted expenditures for FY 2025-26, including transfers and use if General Fund Balance, are $56.1M.

Expenditures through the second quarter were $24.9M or 44% of the total fiscal year 2025-26 budget. For comparison, expenditures through the second quarter in the prior year were 45% of the fiscal year 2024-25 budget. This indicates that the City is trending very similar on a year over year basis as compared to the prior year.

EXPENDITURES BY TYPE:

DISCUSSION OF SIGNIFICANT EXPENDITURE VARIANCES BY TYPE:
 Personnel Services
Through the second quarter of FY 2025-26, Personnel Services total $17.3 million, or 48% of the annual budget, and remain below the proportional mid-year benchmark. Costs are up 5% ($767,000) compared to FY 2024-25, reflecting negotiated salary increases, the one-time payment provided in July, step adjustments, and higher pension costs. Despite these increases, year-end expenditures are projected at $34.9 million, approximately $1.0 million below budget, primarily due to vacancy savings, although costs are expected to trend closer to budget as remaining positions are filled.

Results:

Annual Q2 - 50% Q2 Year-End Vaiance vs.

Budget
FY26 FY26 FY26 $ % $ % FY26 $
Personnel Services $ 35,897,322 $ 17,948,661 $ 17,282,301 $ 771,903 5% $ 1,472,906 9% $ 33,883,263 $ 2,014,059 Services & Supplies 9,596,748 4,798,374 4,491,819 454,005 11% 364,728 9% 9,161,301 435,447 Capital Outlay-Projects 431,266 862,532 504,510 276,267 121% 349,568 226% 801,609 60,923 Debt Service 324,079 648,159 348,643 84,888 32% 54,212 18% 620,605 27,554 Internal Service Charge 1,186,607 2,373,214 1,186,607 (365,783) n/a (16,401) n/a 2,373,214 - Operating Transfers 411,200 822,399 - - n/a (244,403) n/a 822,399 - Capital Transfers 4,293,588 8,587,176 2,445,225 888,176 n/a 485,987 n/a 7,706,522 880,654 Administrative Allocation (2,706,534) (1,353,267) (1,353,267) 59,301 n/a (234,067) n/a (2,706,534) - Expenditures by Type $ 28,040,509 56,081,018 $ 24,905,836 $ 2,168,756 $ 10% 2,232,529 $ 10% 52,662,380 $ 3,418,638 $ General Fund Expenditures by Type: Budget
Year over Year Vs.

FY25
Year over Year Vs.

FY24
Variances: Projection
Packet Page 113

CITY OF SEASIDE

8 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT
 Services & Supplies
Services and Supplies expenditures total $4.5 million through Q2, or 47% of budget, and are tracking slightly below mid-year expectations. Costs are up 11% year over year, reflecting inflationary and contractual increases; however, year-end spending is projected at $9.2 million, approximately $336,000 under budget, indicating expenditures remain within planned appropriations.

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT:

As of the second quarter, General Fund expenditures total $24.9 million, or approximately 44% of the annual budget, and are trending slightly below the proportional mid-year benchmark. Overall spending remains stable, and most departments are operating at or below budgeted levels, with current variances largely attributable to timing, staffing transitions, and specific operational demands rather than ongoing structural issues.

Public safety departments reflect higher overtime expenditures in the first half of the year, particularly in Police and Fire; however, these costs are expected to be substantially offset by salary savings from vacancies and recent recruitments, including the hiring of two firefighters and completed promotions within the Fire Department. Building and Code Enforcement expenditures reflect continued use of subcontracted inspection services to support significant development activity and expanded citywide inspections, partially offset by vacancy savings. Public Works/Engineering is monitoring higher-than-anticipated water utility costs driven by rate increases and increased usage, though overall departmental expenditures remain within budget expectations at mid-year. The Economic Development Department is projecting a small variance of approximately $54,000, primarily related to personnel costs. Staff is requesting two minor budget amendments to align the budget with actual costs, including $30,436 for higher-than-anticipated medical insurance expenses due to changes in employee coverage and $33,026 for an unanticipated personnel-related compensation obligation. Given the department’s small staffing level, these personnel-related changes have a noticeable impact on the budget but are operational in nature.

Results:

General Fund Expenditures by
Annual Q2 - 50% Q2 Year-End Vaiance vs.

Budget
Department: FY26 FY26 FY26 $ % $ % FY26 $
Legislative Body 663,611 $ 331,805.37 $ 244,353 $ 91,857 $ 60% 138,476 $ 131% 612,711 $ 50,900 $ Administration (15,930) (7,965) (105,782) (111,068) -2101% (252,439) -172% (70,307) 54,376 City Clerk 456,959 228,480 177,102 (18,960) -10% 114,664 184% 349,315 107,644 City Attorney 569,710 284,855 130,529 (28,675) -18% 134,603 -3304% 473,289 96,421 Human Resources 58,606 29,303 (79,854) (15,260) 24% (407,616) -124% (64,907) 123,513 Finance Department 269,538 134,769 50,919 (34,010) -40% (80,815) -61% 215,247 54,292 Police Department 17,379,400 8,689,700 8,541,956 (193,734) -2% 640,036 8% 16,840,157 539,243 Fire Department 11,870,173 5,935,086 6,039,750 12% 980,168 662,320 19% 264,039 11,606,134 Building and Code Enforcement 1,458,676 729,338 625,247 106,764 21% 10,752 2% 1,565,893 (107,217) Community, Housing & Economic Development 1,272,621 636,310 438,066 (17,786) -4% 235,889 117% 1,211,396 61,225 Economic Development 753,537 376,769 461,927 18% (85,051) 70,187 -16% (54,951) 808,488 Public Works/Engineering 15,529,935 7,764,968 5,291,490 34% 657,576 1,333,649 14% 1,919,704 13,610,232 Recreation 5,856,983 2,928,491 3,090,132 12% 146,287 323,471 5% 189,680 5,667,303 Expenditures by Department $ 28,061,909 56,123,818 $ 24,905,836 $ 2,168,756 $ 9% 2,232,529 $ 10% 52,824,951 $ 3,298,867 $ Year over Year Vs.

FY24
Budget Variances: Projection
Year over Year Vs.

FY25
Packet Page 114

CITY OF SEASIDE

9 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT
All remaining departments, including Legislative Body, Administration, City Clerk, Finance, Human Resources, and Community Development, are generally trending at or below their proportional budgets, with consultant and professional service expenditures aligned with project timing. Based on current trends, year-end expenditure projections remain consistent with the adopted financial plan.

COUNCIL APPROVED BUDGET AMENDMENTS:

Below is a summary of budget amendments appropriated or committed by the City Council in the first two quarters of the year:

As may be seen, the City Council has approved $325,00 in funds through the first two quarters of the year.

Operating budget amendments affect the operating budget/surplus calculation. Capital budget amendment will result in an expenditure of fund balance, in this case, the portion of fund balance impacted was the capital reserves in the amount of $325,000.

GENERAL FUND NET RESULTS:

Overall, the first half of the year showed expenditures of $24.6M (45% of the annual budget) in comparison with revenues of $21.4M (44% of the annual budget). Projected results are as follows:

Mid-year results indicate that operating revenues are projected to exceed planned operating expenditures by approximately $1.8 million. Despite this positive operating performance, overall fund balance is still expected to decline due to planned uses for street-related expenditures and capital projects, which continue to be funded from previously committed fund balance.

Many capital projects span multiple years, and funding approved in prior budgets is carried forward so projects can continue through completion. As of July 1, 2025, $5,791,963 in fund balance was committed for capital projects to support these ongoing investments in City infrastructure.

Approval
Date
Transfer Capital Reserve to PD Parking Lot Project 300,000 $ 8/8/2025 Transfer Capital Reserve to Cutino Park Light Pole 25,000 $ 11/20/2025 Running total: 325,000 $
City of Seaside General Fund
FY 2025-26 Running Budget Totals - Budget Amendments
As of 2/26/2026
Capital Budget Amendments
General Fund Changes in
Fund Balance:

Beginning Fund Balance (Audited) $ 36,710,646
Projected Revenue 49,184,503 Operating Results
Projected Operating Expenditures 1,814,624 (47,369,879) Street Operation Transfers (1,164,543) Use of Fund Balance Capital Expenditures (5,455,072) (4,290,529) Projected Change in Fund Balance (3,640,448) Projected Ending Fund Balance $ 33,070,198
Projected Budget
FY26
Packet Page 115

CITY OF SEASIDE

10 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT
Other Budget Amendment Requests:

The following summarizes the budget amendments included in the City’s mid-year review, which are needed to address contingencies, unforeseen costs, and operational adjustments that have emerged since the budget was adopted. The total requested from the General Fund balance is $694,556. One item accounts for nearly half of this amount and relates to water cost adjustments, while most of the remaining amendments are supported by corresponding revenues, such as permit activity and other City fee collections. Details of each amendment are provided below.

By Funding Source Request
General Fund Balance $ 694,556
Special Revenue 6,243,207
Water User fees 32,952
Existing budget 1,401,031
Total $ 8,371,746
Description Funding Source Amount
Auto allowance for council that was a new benefit missed in the Personnel budget General Fund Balance 3,342 Auto allowance for City Manager that was a new benefit missed in the Personnel budget General Fund Balance 5,843 Medical Insurance overage, due to estimates and rate changes - City Council General Fund Balance 13,620 Clerk'soffice transfer from salaries to contract services for marketing contract services Existing budget 90,367 Transfer from Finance Consultant budget to Finance Modular Bathroom Addition CIP project Existing budget 60,000 Finance bank fees increase due to greater than expected fee collections via credit card General Fund Balance 58,416 Consultant Services forSuccessor Agency Reporting Special Revenue 24,950 Police Administration overtime covered by salaries savings from Police Operations Existing budget 23,035 Police Field Operations overtime covered by salaries savings from Police Operations Existing budget 116,490 Police Support overtime covered by salaries savings from Police Operations Existing budget 28,652 Police CSA medical supplies; revenue-backed, missed from 25-26 budget development General Fund Balance 5,000 Fire Operations overtime covered by salaries savings in Fire Administration Existing budget 115,111 Fire operations contract services for increased inspections - reimbursed by service fee charges General Fund Balance 20,971 Strike Team deployment Salaries & Benefits - reimburseable General Fund Balance 32,357 Salaries savings in Building department transfer to offset subcontracted services Existing budget 106,577 Additional amount for subcontracted work needed to provide Building & Safety services General Fund Balance 100,000 Medical Insurance overage in Economic Development due to changes in coverage and plan adjustments General Fund Balance 33,026 Additional Salaries for Economic Development for unanticipated personnel-related compensation obligation General Fund Balance 30,436 Transfer from salary savings in parks to trees & irrigation division Existing budget 158,992 Transfer to Parks, Community Projects salaries & benefits from Government Buildings salaries savings Existing budget 87,205 Transfer to Engineering overtime from salary savings Existing budget 20,623 Additional City-wide water expenditures - includes recycled water to golf course General Fund Balance 291,544 Medical Insurance overage, misclassified to Parks Division - Irrigation Existing budget 36,354 Recreation - Transfer to Community Center, Athletic Services, & Afterschool Part-time from Other Divisions Existing budget 274,261 Transfer remaining fund balance from Gardner Trust to Senior Program Special Revenue 5,680 Recreation - Additional funds needed for senior program General Fund Balance 10,000 Sewer permits for Trailers to connect to the sewer system - Cost savings from reduced contract services General Fund Balance 40,000 Budgeting for Full amount of Approved Prop 47 Grant Special Revenue 4,240,152 Second round of funding for Permanent Local Housing Allocation Rental Assitance Program Special Revenue 330,334 Public Works Maintenance additional amount for street light replacement on Broadway General Fund Balance 50,000 Public Works Engineering additional impact fees budgeted for Del Monte/Fremont intersection project Special Revenue 673 Public Works Engineering additional Measure X funding for Pavement Rehab project Special Revenue 20,000 Correct account to transfer $250,000 to the Phase 1 Trails project from Lincoln Cunningham Project Existing budget 250,000 Watermaster assessment for the Seaside Muncipal Water System Water User Fees 23,987 Water System Annual Fees Water User Fees 8,965 Adjustment to Recreational Trail Program for Grant Funding Awarded Special Revenue 1,621,418 Transfer FORA Eucalyptus repairs from Subcontracted work to Consultant Existing budget 18,363 Transfer funds from the Storm Draing Cleaning Project to the CMP Replacement Program Existing budget 15,000 Total $ 6,716,965
Packet Page 116

CITY OF SEASIDE

11 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT

Mid-Year Policy Overview and Other Adjustments to Operating Net Results:

Excluding planned uses of fund balance for capital projects and street operations, operating revenues are projected to exceed operating expenditures by $1.8 million for FY 2025–26. When the budget was adopted, the City’s street funding policy directed that an estimated portion of this excess, $544,387, be applied to the following year’s pavement rehabilitation or street operations budget. This approach was part of a broader strategy to address the recent deficit in street operations over time, which the Council has been made aware of, while continuing to fund critical maintenance needs.

Staff now proposes aligning the street funding methodology with the City’s Pension policy, which estimates the actual available amount at mid-year rather than using a projection, making it consistent and easier to apply. Under the refined approach, any street funding would first cover the operating deficit in Fund 210, with the remainder directed to pavement rehabilitation funded from fund 214. Under the Pension policy, 20% of any realized year-end excess remaining after reserves are met is deposited into the City’s Section 115 Pension Trust, estimated at $362,925 for FY 2025–26.

After applying these policy transfers, and if the budget amendment requests are approved, remaining operating revenues over expenditures are projected at $575,680, providing flexibility for other operational priorities while continuing to address street and pension obligations.

Proposed Street Funding Policy Adjustment – Summary
The policy ensures predictable funding for street rehabilitation by applying an estimated actual amount of year-end operating results to the street fund, rather than a projected figure. This aligns the methodology with the City’s Pension policy, improves accuracy, and supports consistent long-term street maintenance funding.

Furthermore, funding will first address any ongoing operating deficit in Fund 210, with remaining funds directed to pavement rehabilitation projects.

Projected General Fund Net Operating Results: 1,814,624 Mid-year Budget Adjustments Requested: 694,556 Year End Pension Allocation: 362,925 Year End Street Allocation: 544,387
Net Balance: 575,680
Fiscal Impact of Mid-Year Budget Amendments:

Packet Page 117

CITY OF SEASIDE

12 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT
BUDGET OUTLOOK:

The projected Net Position for FY 2025–26 is $33.1 million. After accounting for committed funds, reserves, and transfers under the Pension and Streets policies, the unassigned fund balance is expected to be $4.2 million. While higher than the $317,575 projected at budget adoption, it remains limited relative to ongoing needs. Over the past three years, the General Fund has typically contributed at least $1 million annually for street operations and $1 million for capital projects, and the City also faces an estimated $10 million investment to prepare the Phase 2 Campus Town site.

Given these pressures, unassigned funds must be used carefully, prioritizing revenue-generating development projects. The updated long-term forecast of unassigned fund balance as of mid-year is presented in the next section of this report.

Some insights that may be gained at this mid-year budget review:
 Most major sources of revenue have recovered, but some revenues are projected to decline.  Continued downward pressure Sales and Use Tax from weakness in auto sales.  Marijuana Receipts tax have decreased.
 Street operations funds are in deficit and add pressure to the general fund budget  Personnel costs are up but expected to produce a variance due to vacancies throughout departments.

Headwinds:
 While inflation rates were hovering slightly above the Federal Reserve’s target inflation rate of 2%, it remains to be seen if the recent spike in oil prices will persist.  PERS unfunded liabilities continue to grow.
 Expenses remain high for construction projects with bids expected to come in higher than originally anticipated.  The state budget is in deficit for 2026-27, but is projected to be smaller than expected  Geopolitical unrest continues.

Projected
Results
FY2026
Projected Fund Balance 33,070,198 $
Unspendable (8,657,884) Pension Trust (4,875,000)
Emergency Reserve - 15% (7,231,077)
Special Reserve - 10% (4,820,718)
Capital Reserve - 5% (2,410,359)
Pension Policy - 20% Surplus (362,925) Streets Policy - 30% Surplus (544,387) Unassigned Fund Balance 4,167,848 $
Fund Balance Classifications
After Mid Year Budget
Adjustments
Packet Page 118

CITY OF SEASIDE

13 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT

LONG TERM FORECAST
On the following page may be found the City’s five-year long-term forecast (LTF). The forecast provides 5 years of historical data as context, the amended budget for FY 2025-26 and five years of forward looking projections. The LTF was developed at a high level (low level of detail). The City’s major sources of revenue were grouped into categories and projected. Likewise, the City’s major expenditures were grouped into categories and projected. The majority of the assumptions used in the report were based on a five-year historical trend or provided by outside consultants. Some projections however are based on known payment or increase percentages, such as debt service schedules. Another example is pension costs, which can be estimated with some accuracy. Additionally, the City’s capital costs were input according to the five-year CIP.

The following updates were made to the LTF for the Q2 report:
 FY2024-25 projections were updated with audited results  FY2025-26 projected results were added (unaudited)
Packet Page 119

CITY OF SEASIDE

14 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT
Packet Page 120

CITY OF SEASIDE

15 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT

OPERATING OUTLOOK
Personnel costs remain the City’s primary long-term expenditure pressure. Following the expiration of three-year labor agreements approved in FY 2021-22, the City implemented a 3% salary increase and a one-time $1,500 payment in July 2025 to extend labor negotiations. The absence of long-term labor contracts adds uncertainty to multi-year planning, while pension costs and rising PERS contributions continue to drive cost growth. The City’s Section 115 Trust provides partial mitigation of these pressures.

Overall operating results are expected to remain relatively flat in the near term, with modest surpluses or deficits.

Operating performance is projected to improve in later years as major development projects come online, though Fire Department staffing costs are expected to increase beginning in FY 2029 with the anticipated opening of Fire Station #2.

DEVELOPMENT OUTLOOK
The decline in sales tax revenue in FY 2024–25, driven primarily by weaker automobile sales, underscores the importance of advancing the City’s key economic development initiatives. Major projects, including the Seaside Grand Hyatt Hotel & Resort, Campus Town, Main Gate, and the West Broadway Urban Village, are expected to strengthen Seaside’s long-term revenue base through increased sales, property, and transient occupancy tax generation.

The Seaside Grand Hyatt Hotel & Resort is anticipated to begin construction during the current fiscal year; however, meaningful revenue impacts are not expected until FY 2027–28. Similarly, the City recently selected a developer for the Main Gate Mixed-Use Development Project, advancing another strategically important project that will support revenue growth in future budget cycles.

Proceeds from the sale of Campus Town Phase 1A position the City to advance demolition and site preparation activities for Campus Town Phase 2. While these efforts will require a significant City-funded capital investment and represent a near-term use of fund balance, they are expected to generate net positive fiscal impacts over the long term and support the City’s overall financial sustainability.

OVERALL OUTLOOK
The Long-Term Forecast indicates the City is likely to experience pressure in maintaining reserve levels in the coming years, largely due to weaker revenue performance from FY 2024–25 and increased capital investments needed to advance key development projects in 2026-27. The unassigned fund balance remains positive for FY 2025–26, though the timing of planned capital expenditures could affect policy-level reserves as early as FY 2026–27. Given ongoing economic uncertainty, rising personnel and pension costs, and elevated construction prices, the forecast will continue to be closely monitored and updated as conditions evolve.

Packet Page 121

CITY OF SEASIDE

16 Q2 FY 2025-26 FINANCIAL REPORT

OTHER FUNDS
In addition to the General Fund, the budget includes funds from a range of restricted sources as well as business-type activities that are used to provide specific services, including:

WATER FUND:

The Water Enterprise Fund continues to operate as intended. The current capital improvement program totals approximately $2.0 million, which is roughly equivalent to the fund’s available fund balance. As capital projects begin, these expenditures are reflected as negative net revenue in the first quarter, consistent with project timing rather than an operating shortfall. Design work for a new well, deferred from the prior year, has been rolled into the current fiscal year.

Year-over-year expenditures increased due to higher personnel costs from filling vacant maintenance positions, while operating revenues remain in line with budget. The fund’s fiscal position has also been strengthened through the sale of excess water credits to the City in exchange for a reduction in an outstanding interfund loan. A new water rate study is currently underway and will guide future rate adjustments.

STORM WATER FUND:

The Storm Water fund expenditures in the second quarter were approximately $9595,000. Storm Water costs were $396,000 higher than the same quarter of the previous year, mainly due to timing of capital Improvement projects.

Currently the primary source of funding for the Storm Water fund is the City’s General Fund. City staff continues to seek grant funding when available as well.

Requests for additional financial information may be directed to:

City of Seaside, Finance Department, 440 Harcourt Avenue, Seaside CA, 93955 Attention: Jessica Riley, Finance Director| Email; [email protected]| Phone; (831) 899-6716 Budget
Q2
FY26 FY26 FY25 $ %
Operating Revenues $ 645,778 $ 701,073 700,318 $ $ (755) 0% Expenditures (1,656,403) (479,380) (480,808) (1,428) 0% Net Revenues $ (1,010,625) 220,938 $ 220,265 $ 673 0%
Year over Year Vs.

Variances:

Water Enterprise Q2 Results
Results:

Q2
Packet Page 122

Seaside City CouncilMarch 19, 2026

Seaside City Council
March 19, 2026