Page | 1
City Council
Mayor Jill McLewis
Vice Mayor Sandra Maurer
Councilmember Phill Carter
Interim City Manager
Mary Gourley
[email protected]
Councilmember Neysa Hinton
Councilmember Stephen Zollman
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
MINUTES FOR MEETING OF February 17, 2026
As Approved by the City Council at their regular meeting of April 7, 2026.
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor McLewis called the meeting to order 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Mayor Jill McLewis
Vice Mayor Sandra Maurer
Councilmember Phill Carter
Councilmember Neysa Hinton
Councilmember Stephen Zollman
Absent: None
Staff: Interim City Manager Mary Gourley
City Attorney Alex Mog
Administrative Services Director Kwong
Police Chief McDonagh
Public Works Operations Supervisor Billing
SALUTE TO THE FLAG: Scouting America Troup 27 led the salute to the flag.
REMOTE PARTICIPATION UNDER AB 2449 (IF NEEDED): To consider and take action on any request from a Council Member to participate in a meeting remotely due to Just Cause or Emergency Circumstances pursuant to AB 2449 (Government Code Section 549539(f)). Assembly Bill 2302 (2024) (“AB 2302”) revises rules for when members of local legislative bodies may participate in meetings remotely. Specifically, it amends the number of meetings that may be attended remotely for just cause and under emergency circumstances and clarifies the definition of the term “meeting,” for purposes of remote attendance. AB 2302 caps the number of remote meetings a member can attend each year based on the frequency of a legislative body’s meetings: Five meetings per year for those meeting twice a month.
None.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The City of Sebastopol acknowledges that we live and work within the unceded ancestral homelands of the Southern Pomo and the Coast Miwok people. We pay our respect to the past, present, and future generations of these peoples, including the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria.
City of Sebastopol History Acknowledgement by Mayor
Page | 2
PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS/INTRODUCTIONS:
• CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION – Gold Ridge Fire Department • CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION – City of Sebastopol Police Department • Chief McDonagh
• Officer Josiah Wotila
• Officer Jaime Baldovinos
• Dispatcher Chris Mooney
Reference Order Number: 2026-044
STATEMENTS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Conflicts of interest may arise in situations where a public official deliberating towards a decision has an actual or potential financial interest in the matter before the Council. In accordance with state law, an actual conflict of interest is one that would be to the private financial benefit of a public official, a relative or a business with which the Councilmember is associated. A potential conflict of interest is one that could be to the private financial benefit of a Councilmember, a relative or a business with which the Councilmember is associated. A Councilmember must publicly announce potential and actual conflicts of interest, and, in the case of actual conflict of interest, must refrain from participating in debate on the issue or from voting on the issue and must remove themselves from the debate.
There were no stated conflicts of interest.
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA (FIRST COMMENT PERIOD):
• Up to Twenty (20) Minute Time Limit (Two Minutes for up to ten speakers). • Additional public comments will be held at the end of the discussion and action items for up to an additional twenty (20) minutes.
• Mayor has discretion to allow for additional time beyond the 20 minutes allocated for public comment dependent upon the subject matter or number of speakers.
• Process for calling on Speakers: Mayor or designee shall ask for public comment as follows: Speakers to be called on in an alternate manner (One speaker in person to be called on first; then one speaker remote to be called on second with additional speakers to be called on in the same manner) based upon the time limit.
The following member(s) of the public spoke during public comment:
1. Lisa
2. Kate
3. Oliver
4. Jim
5. Craig
6. Carrie
7. Robert
8. Russell
9. Omar
10. Myriah
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Page | 3
• The consent agenda consists of items that are routine in nature and do not require additional discussion by the City Council or have been reviewed by the City Council previously. These items may be approved by one motion without discussion unless a member of the City Council requests that the item be taken off the consent calendar. • The Mayor will read aloud the title of each consent item (either full agenda title or a simplified version of the agenda title), and ask if a Councilmember wishes to remove one or more items from the consent calendar; and then open public comment to the members of the public in attendance. At this time, a member of the public may speak for up to two (2) minutes on the entire consent calendar and request at that time that an item or items removed for discussion. • If an item or items are removed from the consent calendar, the item shall be placed at the end of the regular agenda items unless otherwise determined by the Mayor. Council Members may comment on Consent Calendar items or ask for minor clarifications without the need for pulling the item for separate consideration. Items requiring deliberation should be pulled for separate consideration and shall be placed at the end of the regular agenda items unless otherwise determined by the Mayor.
Mayor McLewis read the consent calendar.
Mayor McLewis asked if any Councilmember wanted to remove a consent calendar item. There were no requests.
Mayor McLewis opened for public comment. The following member(s) of the public spoke during public comment:
Lawrence
Mayor McLewis called for a motion.
MOTION:
Vice Mayor Maurer moved and Councilmember Zollman seconded the motion to approve consent calendar item number(s) 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Mayor McLewis called for a roll call vote. City staff conducted a roll call vote.
VOTE:
Ayes: Councilmembers Carter, Hinton, Zollman, Vice Mayor Maurer and Mayor McLewis Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
1. Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes for Meeting of February 3, 2026 Responsible Department: Interim City Manager
Fiscal Impact: Staff time required to prepare the minutes is covered within existing budgeted salaries. No additional financial impact is anticipated with approval of this item.
City Council Action: Approved City Council Meeting Minutes for Meeting of February 3, 2026 Minute Order Number: 2026-045
2. Approval of Second Reading for Formula Business Ordinance Updates. Updates to the Formula Business Ordinance to Clarify Applicability and Terms.
Responsible Department: City Attorney/Planning
Page | 4
Fiscal Impact: Staff time required to prepare agenda item report is covered within existing budgeted salaries. No additional financial impact is anticipated with approval of this item.
City Council Action: Approved Second Reading for Formula Business Ordinance Updates. Updates to the Formula Business Ordinance to Clarify Applicability and Terms.
Minute Order Number: 2026-046
Ordinance Number: 1163
3. Sebastopol Kiwanis Club to Conduct their Annual Fireworks Show on July 3, 2026 located on public property of the West Sonoma County Union High School District, Analy High School, 6950 Analy Avenue, Sebastopol and finding this action exempt under CEQA Section 15304(e). At the City of Sebastopol, City Council meeting on July 28, 2021, the Council eliminated the Lottery Policy Application Process and permanently assigned the Annual Fireworks Show to the Sebastopol Kiwanis Club with the following requirements:
By January 15th of each year the Sebastopol Kiwanis Club will provide to the city information as to whether the Kiwanis will conduct or not the Annual Fireworks Show The Sebastopol Kiwanis Club holds the First Right of Refusal The Annual Fireworks Show will be scheduled on July 3rd of each year Other non-profits would be invited and included in the event as appropriate Responsible Department: Gold Ridge Fire Department/Public Works Fiscal Impact: Staff time required to prepare the minutes is covered within existing budgeted salaries. No additional financial impact is anticipated with approval of this item.
City Council Action: Approved Sebastopol Kiwanis Club to Conduct their Annual Fireworks Show on July 3, 2026, located on public property of the West Sonoma County Union High School District, Analy High School, 6950 Analy Avenue, Sebastopol and finding this action exempt under CEQA Section 15304(e). At the City of Sebastopol, City Council meeting on July 28, 2021, the Council eliminated the Lottery Policy Application Process and permanently assigned the Annual Fireworks Show to the Sebastopol Kiwanis Club with the following requirements:
By January 15th of each year the Sebastopol Kiwanis Club will provide to the city information as to whether the Kiwanis will conduct or not the Annual Fireworks Show
The Sebastopol Kiwanis Club holds the First Right of Refusal The Annual Fireworks Show will be scheduled on July 3rd of each year Other non-profits would be invited and included in the event as appropriate
Minute Order Number: 2026-047
4. Approval of Process for Transition to Sonoma County Permit Sonoma- Fire Prevention Division CUPA. Item is for authorization for City of Sebastopol to file a formal relinquishment letter with CalEPA under HSC §25404.3(f), requesting that Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) authority for Sebastopol be assigned Sonoma County Permit Sonoma- Fire Prevention Division CUPA and Authorize the City Manager to work with Gold Ridge to execute and submit all required notices, correspondence, and transition documents necessary to effectuate the transfer. If approved by CalEPA, Gold Ridge and City staff will return with remaining action items as listed later in the report.
Responsible Department: City Attorney/Gold Ridge Fire Department/Interim City Manager Fiscal Impact: Staff time required to prepare agenda item report is covered within existing budgeted salaries. No additional financial impact is anticipated with approval of this item.
City Council Action: Approved Process for Transition to Sonoma County Permit Sonoma- Fire Prevention Division CUPA. Item is for authorization for City of Sebastopol to file a formal relinquishment letter with CalEPA under HSC
Page | 5
§25404.3(f), requesting that Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) authority for Sebastopol be assigned Sonoma County Permit Sonoma- Fire Prevention Division CUPA and Authorize the City Manager to work with Gold Ridge to execute and submit all required notices, correspondence, and transition documents necessary to effectuate the transfer. If approved by CalEPA, Gold Ridge and City staff will return with remaining action items as listed later in the report.
Minute Order Number: 2026-048
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS/PRESENTATIONS: Informational Items or Presentations are items that are informational only and do not require action by the City Council. Presentations shall be scheduled as necessary for the promotion of an event or service or general information items to the Council and should be limited to ten (10) minutes total in length of item (total length includes questions of Council to presenter and public comment).
5. Government Specific Equipment Annual Report Out. Annual report of department’s government specific equipment.
Responsible Department: Police
Fiscal Impact: The specific equipment in question was purchased prior to 2015. The only cost is the ongoing costs of training and supplies which are currently allocated for in the existing police department budget. The fiscal impact is approximately $750.00 per year for training and supplies and is a currently budgeted item.
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN POSTPONED AND WILL NOT BE HEARD AT THIS MEETING; THIS ITEM WILL BE CONTINUED TO A FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
Reference Order Number: 2026-049
PUBLIC HEARING(s):
6. BOLD Program Participation Discussion & Action. Item includes a presentation on CMFA’s BOLD Program; a Resolution joining the CMFA; and a resolution authorizing participation in the BOLD program for the Canopy Housing Project. All costs can be reimbursed through the BOLD program
Responsible Department: Planning Department/Administrative Services/City Attorney Fiscal Impact: Staff time required to prepare agenda item report is covered within existing budgeted salaries. There is no cost or liability for the City to join CMFA as a member. In addition, all of the costs and expenses related to the formation, issuance of bonds and ongoing administration for the CFD formed by the BOLD Program for The Canopy project is the responsibility of City Ventures and/or CMFA and there is no liability or fiscal impact on the City. The City will be reimbursed for any staff time expended on the program.
City Attorney Mog presented the agenda item and introduced consultants.
Consultants provided a presentation on the BOLD program.
Mayor McLewis opened for questions of staff or consultants. The Council asked various questions of the consultant and City staff.
Mayor McLewis opened the public hearing public comment period. The following member(s) of the public spoke during the public comment period:
Page | 6
Lawrence
June
Kate
Hearing no further comments, Mayor McLewis closed the public hearing.
City Council Discussion/Deliberations/Comments:
Council continued discussion of the item.
Mayor McLewis called for a motion.
MOTION:
Councilmember Hinton moved and Vice Mayor Maurer seconded the motion to approve and adopt a resolution joining CMFA and approve and adopt Resolution authorizing BOLD solely for City Ventures’ The Canopy development project.
Mayor McLewis called for a roll call vote. City staff conducted a roll call vote.
VOTE:
Ayes: Councilmembers Hinton, Zollman, Vice Mayor Maurer and Mayor McLewis Noes: Councilmember Carter
Absent: None
Abstain: None
City Council Action: Approved resolution joining CMFA and approve and adopt Resolution authorizing BOLD solely for City Ventures’ The Canopy development project.
Minute Order Number: 2026-050
Resolution Number: 6733-2026
Resolution Number: 6734-2026
7. Surveillance Ordinance: Public Hearing to consider First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance to amend Chapter 8.80 of the City’s Surveillance Technology and Community Safety Ordinance.
Responsible Department: City Attorney/Police
Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact of this ordinance. The ordinance itself does not authorize the purchase of any equipment, which would be handled through the City’s normal budget and procurement process.
City Attorney Mog presented the agenda item.
Mayor McLewis opened for questions from staff. The Council asked various questions of the City staff.
Page | 7
Mayor McLewis opened the public hearing public comment period. The following member(s) of the public spoke during the public comment period:
Oliver
Kate
Omar
Woody
Michael
Jim
Robert
June
Una
Magnus
Jim
Hearing no further comments, Mayor McLewis closed the public hearing.
City Council Discussion/Deliberations/Comments:
Council continued discussion of the item.
Mayor McLewis called for a motion.
MOTION:
Councilmember Carter moved and Vice Mayor Maurer seconded the motion the First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance amending Chapter 8.80 of the City’s Surveillance Technology and Community Safety Ordinance as amended:
• Not Make proposed changes to A and B and Maintain Changes to C and D • Still facilitate use of private cameras
• Not allow to upgrade existing City cameras without Council approval Language below;
A. Seeking funds for surveillance technology, including, but not limited to, applying for a grant or soliciting or accepting State or Federal funds or in-kind or other donations for the purpose of acquiring surveillance technology;
B. Acquiring or borrowing new surveillance technology, including, but not limited to, acquiring such technology without the exchange of monies or consideration.
C. Using a new or existing surveillance technology for a purpose, in a manner or in a location not previously approved by the City Council in accordance with this chapter. This does not apply to traditional security cameras, except for the use of traditional security cameras owned by the City in a new location; or
Page | 8
D. Entering into an agreement, including a written or oral agreement, with a non-City entity to acquire, share or otherwise use surveillance technology or the information it provides, including data-sharing agreements. This does not include the City using traditional security cameras for a specific incident or event, as long as such use is not part of an ongoing arrangement with a non-City entity.
Mayor McLewis called for a roll call vote. City staff conducted a roll call vote.
VOTE:
Ayes: Councilmembers Carter, Hinton, Zollman, Vice Mayor Maurer and Mayor McLewis Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
City Council Action: Approved First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance amending Chapter 8.80 of the City’s Surveillance Technology and Community Safety Ordinance as amended:
• Not Make proposed changes to A and B and Maintain Changes to C and D • Still facilitate use of private cameras
• Not allow to upgrade existing City cameras without Council approval Language below;
A. Seeking funds for surveillance technology, including, but not limited to, applying for a grant or soliciting or accepting State or Federal funds or in-kind or other donations for the purpose of acquiring surveillance technology;
B. Acquiring or borrowing new surveillance technology, including, but not limited to, acquiring such technology without the exchange of monies or consideration; C. Using a new or existing surveillance technology for a purpose, in a manner or in a location not previously approved by the City Council in accordance with this chapter. This does not apply to traditional security cameras, except for the use of traditional security cameras owned by the City in a new location; or D. Entering into an agreement, including a written or oral agreement, with a non-City entity to acquire, share or otherwise use surveillance technology or the information it provides, including data-sharing agreements.
This does not include the City using traditional security cameras for a specific incident or event, as long as such use is not part of an ongoing arrangement with a non-City entity.
Minute Order Number: 2025-051
Ordinance Number: 1164
REGULAR CALENDAR AGENDA ITEMS (DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION):
8. Discussion of the Sebastopol Community Cultural Community Center Short- and Long-Term Plan and provide direction to staff. Present the Memorandum prepared by Toni Bertolero regarding short- and long-term plan for the community center and discuss recommendations for Council’s direction.
Responsible Department: Public Works
Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact with receipt of this item. The cost for the memo preparation is approved in the CIP budget.
Toni Betolero presented the agenda item.
Page | 9
Mayor McLewis opened for questions from staff. The Council asked various questions of the City staff.
Mayor McLewis opened the public comment period. The following member(s) of the public spoke during the public comment period:
Kenyon
Robert
Craig
Kate
Laura
Oliver
City Council Discussion/Deliberations/Comments:
Council continued discussion of the item.
Mayor McLewis called for a motion.
MOTION:
Councilmember Carter moved and Vice Mayor Maurer seconded the motion to:
• Accept the Report and direct staff to include the flood mitigation and repairs in the list prepared by Interactive Resources, in the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Program for future consideration of approval.
• Direct staff to explore and move forward with implementation for a shared civic space either with the Sebastopol Commons and/or with another non-profit organization.
Mayor McLewis called for a roll call vote. City staff conducted a roll call vote.
VOTE:
Ayes: Councilmembers Carter, Hinton, Zollman, Vice Mayor Maurer and Mayor McLewis Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
City Council Action: Approved to Accept the Report and direct staff to include the flood mitigation and repairs in the list prepared by Interactive Resources, in the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Program for future consideration of approval; and directed staff to explore and move forward with implementation for a shared civic space either with the Sebastopol Commons and/or with another non-profit organization.
Minute Order Number: 2025-052
9. BAYREN Program – Water $ave Closure. The Water $ave Program through BAYREN is closing and BAYREN is proposing options for the City to consider with program closure Responsible Department: Administrative Services/City Attorney Fiscal Impact: BayREN has offered to settle the City’s remaining WUSave obligation for $13,141.23, a major reduction from the full $30,020.57 owed. The recommended split is $7,409.94 from the General Fund and
Page | 10
$5,731.29 from the Water Fund, which would fully close out the program.
Declining the offer means eight more years of repayments and ongoing administrative work to manage a discontinued program.
Accepting the settlement is the most cost-effective option, reduces workload, and cleanly closes the program.
Administrative Services Director Kwong presented the agenda item.
Mayor McLewis opened for questions from staff. The Council asked various questions of City staff.
Mayor McLewis opened the public comment period. The following member(s) of the public spoke during the public comment period:
Oliver
Kate
Steve
Robert
Mary
Mary
City Council Discussion/Deliberations/Comments:
Council continued discussion of the item.
Mayor McLewis called for a motion.
MOTION:
Vice Mayor Maurer moved and Councilmember Zollman seconded the motion to approve a one-time settlement payment to BayREN to fully resolve and close out the Water Upgrade Save (WUSave) program, with $5,731.29 paid from the Water Fund holding account and the remaining $7,409.94 paid from the General Fund.
Mayor McLewis called for a roll call vote. City staff conducted a roll call vote.
VOTE:
Ayes: Councilmembers Carter, Hinton, Zollman, Vice Mayor Maurer and Mayor McLewis Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
City Council Action: Approved to settle the City’s remaining WUSave obligation for $13,141.23, a major reduction from the full $30,020.57 (with General Fund to cover the remaining balance of $7,409.94) Minute Order Number: 2026-053
10. Discussion and Consideration of 2026–2027 City Council Goals and Priorities – Meeting Date, Facilitator, and Process. The item asks the Council to decide on:
Page | 11
a. Whether to hire an external facilitator for a dedicated goal-setting workshop. b. Handle the process internally without a facilitator. c. And to set a specific date for the goals/priorities discussion session.
This is to guide policy, budgeting (especially for FY 2026-27), and operations for the coming period.
Responsible Department: Interim City Manager
Fiscal Impact: Proposals submitted range from $4400 - $9125. The FY 25 26 Budget did not allocate or fund a facilitator for the goals and priority setting. If approved, a budget amendment would be required.
Interim City Manager Gourley presented the agenda item.
Mayor McLewis opened for questions from staff. The Council asked various questions of City staff.
Mayor McLewis opened the public comment period. The following member(s) of the public spoke during the public comment period: None
City Council Discussion/Deliberations/Comments:
Council continued discussion of the item.
Mayor McLewis called for a motion.
MOTION:
Mayor McLewis moved and Vice Mayor Maurer seconded the motion to reject external facilitation and set a date for the Goals and Priorities Setting Meeting, directing staff to prepare a proposed list of actions and priorities using the current six goals.
Date: April 14th 6:00 pm
Youth Annex
Mayor McLewis called for a roll call vote. City staff conducted a roll call vote.
VOTE:
Ayes: Councilmembers Carter, Hinton, Zollman, Vice Mayor Maurer and Mayor McLewis Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
City Council Action: Approved motion to reject external facilitation and set a date for the Goals and Priorities Setting Meeting, directing staff to prepare a proposed list of actions and priorities using the current six goals.
Date: April 14th 6:00 pm
Youth Annex
Minute Order Number: 2026-054
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: Two minutes per speaker for up to twenty (20) minutes total for public comments but can be reduced at Mayor’s discretion depending upon the number of speakers or Mayor has discretion to allow for additional time beyond the 20 minutes allocated for public comment dependent upon the subject matter or number of speakers.
Page | 12
None
COUNCILMEMBER(S) REQUESTS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS: None CITY COUNCIL/CITY STAFF REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/FUTURE MEETINGS:
11. City Manager and/or City Clerk Reports: (This will be either verbal reports at the meeting, or written reports provided at or prior to the meeting) a. Departmental Reports
b. Animal Control Inspection Reports -Police
Reference Order Number: 2026-055
12. City Council Reports/Committee/Sub-Committee Meeting Reports: (Reports by Mayor/City Councilmembers Regarding Various Agency Meetings/Committee Meetings/Sub-Committee Meeting /Conferences Attended and Possible Direction to its Representatives (If Needed) on Pending issues before such Boards. ((This will be either verbal reports at the meeting, or written reports provided at or prior to the meeting)
13. Council Communications Received (Information/Meetings/Correspondence Received from the General Public to Councilmembers)
CLOSED SESSION: NONE
ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 17, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting was adjourned at 10:29 and was adjourned to the next Regular City Council Meeting of Tuesday, March 3, 2026 at 6:00 pm, Sebastopol Youth Annex, 425 Morris Street, Sebastopol, CA.
Respectfully submitted:
Mary C. Gourley
Interim City Manager
Attachment(s):
Raw Zoom Minutes
VITAC Minutes
WEBVTT
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:10.000
>>> ZACH, ARE WE READYTO START RECORDING THE MEETING?
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:16.000
THANK YOU.
00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:19.000
>> NO PROBLEM. SO ARE WE READY? ALL RIGHT, EVERYONE,
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:25.000
WOW. WE HAVE A
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:29.000
FULL HOUSE. WELCOME, EVERYONE. ALL RIGHT, SO LET'S JUST CALL THIS MEETING TO
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:32.000
ORDER. IT IS 6:00 P.M., FEBRUARY
00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:35.000
17, AND MARY,
00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:38.000
DO YOU WANT TO --
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:40.000
>> I'LL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. COUNCILMEMBER CARTER? 00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:43.000
>> HERE.
00:00:43.000 --> 00:00:46.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER HINTON?
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:48.000
>> HERE.
00:00:48.000 --> 00:00:51.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN?
00:00:51.000 --> 00:00:54.000
>> YES.
00:00:54.000 --> 00:00:57.000
>> VICE MAYOR MAURER?
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:00.000
>> HERE.
00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:02.000
>> MAYOR MCLEWIS?
00:01:02.000 --> 00:01:05.000
>> HERE.
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:08.000
>> PLEASE NOTE, ALL COUNCILMEMBERS ARE IN ATTENDANCE.
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:11.000
>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. WE HAVE SPECIAL GUESTS HERE TONIGHT, SO WE'RE
GOING TO
00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:13.000
DO A ABSOLUTE TO THE FLAG, BUT SCOUTING AMERICA, TROOP 27 SEBASTOPOL,
SOMEONE IS
00:01:13.000 --> 00:01:17.000
GOING TO COME UP AND HELP US LEAD THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. ALL RIGHT, SO IF WE
00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:21.000
WOULD ALL STAND. YOU CAN JUST STAND RIGHT THERE IF YOU WANT TO GO 00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:32.000
AHEAD AND GET IT STARTED.
00:01:32.000 --> 00:01:35.000
[ INAUDIBLE ]
00:01:35.000 --> 00:01:38.000
>> PLEASE JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEI PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG .
00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:43.000
OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE
00:01:43.000 --> 00:01:56.000
NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. 00:01:56.000 --> 00:02:04.000
>> ALL
00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:07.000
RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. LET ME GET BACK. SO LET'S SEE. I JUST WANT TO SEE IF
00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:11.000
WE HAVE EVERYONE HERE. WE ALWAYS DO A LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT, SO I'M GOING TO GO
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:16.000
AHEAD AND READ THAT RIGHT NOW. THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL ACKNOWLEDGES THAT
WE LIVE
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:20.000
AND WORK WITHIN THE UNCEDED ANCESTRAL HOMELANDS OF THE SOUTHERN POMO AND COAST
00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:23.000
MIWOK PEOPLE. WE PAY OUR RESPECTS TO THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE
GENERATIONS
00:02:23.000 --> 00:02:31.000
OF THESE PEOPLES, INCLUDING THE FED
00:02:31.000 --> 00:02:35.000
RATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA. AND IN ADDITION EVERY MEETING, I READ JUST A
00:02:35.000 --> 00:02:40.000
LITTLE BLURB ABOUT REMEMBERING THE HISTORY OF SEBASTOPOL. SO JUST TWO
QUICK ONES
00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:47.000
FOR THIS EVENING. I DO THIS IN CONJUNCTION
00:02:47.000 --> 00:02:51.000
WITH OUR WEST COUNTY HISTORY MUSEUM. IN 1937, SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS WERE
MADE IN
00:02:51.000 --> 00:02:58.000
SEBASTOPOL. SEBASTOPOL RECEIVED $19,000 IN FUNDS TO IMPROVE ITS SIDEWALKS AND
00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:03.000
STREETS. THE PROJECT ACTUALLY EMPLOYED 28 MEN FOR EIGHT MONTHS. THEN IN 1939, A
00:03:03.000 --> 00:03:08.000
$30,000 PARK FUND WAS GIVEN TO SEBASTOPOL. SEBASTOPOL WAS ENDOWED WITH
THE CASH
00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:14.000
LEGACY OF $30,000 OR MORE TO BE USED IN DEVELOPING A CITY PARK AND
PLAYGROUND
00:03:14.000 --> 00:03:21.000
ACCORDING TO TERMS OF THE WILL OF KATHERINE L. IVES TODAY IN SANTA ROSA.
THIS IS
00:03:21.000 --> 00:03:26.000
FROM A PAPER BACK THEN. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE WILL, PRESIDENT OF
SEBASTOPOL
00:03:26.000 --> 00:03:30.000
NATIONAL BANK AND THREE TRUSTEES
00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:34.000
WERE APPOINTED. HARRY FULLER,
00:03:34.000 --> 00:03:40.000
A.F. COCHRAN, AND JEANNE BECK. THEY SHALL REQUIRE ATTRACTED LAND TO BE
DEDICATED
00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:44.000
FOR THE PLAYGROUND RECREATIONAL USES TO APPROVE TRACK, AND SHALL BE
DESIGNATED
00:03:44.000 --> 00:03:48.000
AS IVES MEMORIAL PARK.THEREAFTER IT SHALL BE DEEDED TO THE 00:03:48.000 --> 00:03:51.000
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL. MRS. IVES HAD CONSIDERABLE PROPERTY HOLDINGS IN THE CITY,
00:03:51.000 --> 00:03:54.000
AND SHE WAS A COUSIN OF
00:03:54.000 --> 00:03:59.000
THE LATE A.B. SWAIN. A
00:03:59.000 --> 00:04:04.000
PIECE OF INFORMATION. A.B. SWAIN DEVELOPED SWAIN WOODS JUST SOUTH OF HYDE PARK.
00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:08.000
I ENJOY READING ALL THESE PIECES OF HISTORY, NOT BEING FROM HERE. I'VE LIVED
00:04:08.000 --> 00:04:14.000
HERE FOR 11 YEARS, SO I LEARNED A LOT. I HOPE OTHERS DO 00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:17.000
AS WELL. SO LET'S SEE, MOVING ON TO THE NEXT ITEM. WE HAVE PROCLAMATIONS 00:04:17.000 --> 00:04:23.000
TONIGHT. WE HAVE A PROCLAMATION -- I DON'T KNOW. LET ME PUT MY GLASSES ON HERE
00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:26.000
TO SEE WHO IS ALL HERE. SO DO WE HAVE GOLD RIDGE PRESENT? OKAY. SO WE HAVE A
00:04:26.000 --> 00:04:30.000
CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION, AND I'M
00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:35.000
GOING TO GO AHEAD AND READ THOSE. LET ME JUST
00:04:35.000 --> 00:04:44.000
PULL THOSE OUT VERY QUICKLY.
00:04:44.000 --> 00:04:49.000
MY APOLOGIES. SOME OF THESE GOT A
00:04:49.000 --> 00:04:55.000
LITTLE BIT OUT OF ORDER. SORRY, OKAY. SO I'M GOING TO READ ONE OF THESE, AND
00:04:55.000 --> 00:04:59.000
THEN I WILL JUST CALL EVERYONE UP. YOU CAN LET ME KNOW -- I DON'T KNOW IF YOU
00:04:59.000 --> 00:05:03.000
WANT A GROUP PICTURE AT THE END. YOU CAN LET ME KNOW IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO
00:05:03.000 --> 00:05:08.000
THAT. THIS CERTIFICATE IS PRESENTED TO SHOW OUR SINCERE APPRECIATION FOR YOUR
00:05:08.000 --> 00:05:11.000
PROMPT PROFESSIONAL AND DEDICATED RESPONSE TO THE HOUSE FIRE. YOUR
COMMITMENT TO
00:05:11.000 --> 00:05:14.000
PUBLIC SAFETY TEAMWORK AND SERVICE
00:05:14.000 --> 00:05:19.000
TO THE COMMUNITY WAS
00:05:19.000 --> 00:05:24.000
CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED THROUGH YOUR ACTIONS.THE CITY SENDS ITS --
RESPONDING TO
00:05:24.000 --> 00:05:28.000
THIS EMERGENCY IN HELPING PROTECT LIVES AND PROPERTY. ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
00:05:28.000 --> 00:05:31.000
COUNCIL AND CITIZENS OF SEBASTOPOL, I, MAYOR MCLEWIS, GRATEFULLY
ACKNOWLEDGE
00:05:31.000 --> 00:05:35.000
YOUR DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL AND
00:05:35.000 --> 00:05:38.000
THE CITIZENS OF THIS COMMUNITY. AND THIS IS ON GOLD RIDGE FIRE DISTRICT, IF YOU
00:05:38.000 --> 00:05:40.000
WANT TO COME UP. WE
00:05:40.000 --> 00:05:45.000
CAN
00:05:45.000 --> 00:06:15.000
PRESENT THIS TO YOU.
00:06:29.000 --> 00:06:33.000
>> AND NOW WE'D ALSO LIKE TO PRESENT THE SAME CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION TO OUR
00:06:33.000 --> 00:06:37.000
POLICE OFFICERS, SO WE HAVE
00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:41.000
CHIEF MCDONAGH, OFFICER JOSIAH WOTILA, OFFICER JAIME BALDOVINOS, AND
DISPATCHER
00:06:41.000 --> 00:06:46.000
CHRIS MOONEY. IF YOU WOULD ALL LIKE TO COME UP, WE'D LOVE TO 00:06:46.000 --> 00:06:49.000
PRESENT YOU WITH A CERTIFICATE, AND TRULY A LOT
00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:53.000
OF
00:06:53.000 --> 00:07:23.000
GRATITUDE FOR EVERYTHING YOU'VE DONE.
00:07:37.000 --> 00:07:40.000
WE
00:07:40.000 --> 00:07:44.000
JUST WANT
00:07:44.000 --> 00:07:49.000
TO SAY THANK YOU.
00:07:49.000 --> 00:07:52.000
SEAN, DID YOU WANT A
00:07:52.000 --> 00:07:55.000
GROUP PICTURE WITH THE FIREFIGHTERS? OKAY. IF WE COULD DO THAT VERY QUICKLY. YOU
00:07:55.000 --> 00:08:25.000
WANT TO COME UPFRONT AND WE CAN DO IT?
00:09:07.000 --> 00:09:10.000
THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. WE APPRECIATE YOU GIVING US LATITUDE TO HONOR THESEGUYS. EVERYONE WHO HAS TAKEN CARE OF OUR COMMUNITY EVERY DAY. ALL
RIGHT, SO
00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:15.000
WE'RE GOING TO GO ONTO STATEMENTS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. DO WE 00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:18.000
HAVE ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST? NO? OKAY. ALL RIGHT, NOW WE'RE GOING TO GO TO
00:09:18.000 --> 00:09:21.000
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA. IT'S UP TO 20 MINUTES, AND
I'LL HAND
00:09:21.000 --> 00:09:24.000
IT OVER TO MARY.
00:09:24.000 --> 00:09:29.000
>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. SO AS YOU JUST STATED, THIS IS THE FIRST PUBLIC
COMMENT
00:09:29.000 --> 00:09:33.000
PERIOD. THERE ARE TWO. THERE'S A SECOND ONE AT THE END OF THE AGENDA. IT IS A
00:09:33.000 --> 00:09:37.000
20-MINUTE TIME LIMIT FOR THE FIRST PERIOD. THAT MEANS IT IS TWO MINUTES PER
00:09:37.000 --> 00:09:40.000
SPEAKER, SO WE'LL HAVE TEN SPEAKERS. I'LL DO CHAMBERS FIRST, THEN I'LL GO OUT TO
00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:45.000
ZOOM, COME
00:09:45.000 --> 00:09:50.000
BACK TO CHAMBERS, GO OUT TO ZOOM. ANYONE IN THE CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE
TO MAKE
00:09:50.000 --> 00:09:53.000
A PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA? LISA, THEN I'LL 00:09:53.000 --> 00:09:56.000
GO
00:09:56.000 --> 00:09:59.000
OUT TO ZOOM AFTER THAT.
00:09:59.000 --> 00:10:01.000
>> HI, EVERYBODY. IS IT
00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:04.000
ON?
00:10:04.000 --> 00:10:09.000
>> IS THE LIGHT ON?
00:10:09.000 --> 00:10:14.000
>> MY NAME IS LISA PIERS. I WANT TO SAY A FEW THINGS ABOUT A BIG DECISION YOU'LL
00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:21.000
SOON BE FACING ABOUT OUR STREET SYSTEM. I THINK THE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION
WE NEED
00:10:21.000 --> 00:10:27.000
TO ASK OURSELVES IS WHY IN 1985 DID WE SWITCH FROM A TWO-WAY STREET
SYSTEM TO A
00:10:27.000 --> 00:10:32.000
ONE-WAY SYSTEM. AND WE HAVE TO REALLY UNDERSTAND THAT ONE. AND THEN WHY
WOULD WE
00:10:32.000 --> 00:10:35.000
WANT TO SWITCH BACK? AND THEN WHAT ARE ALL THE POTENTIAL DRAWBACKS,
RISKS, AND
00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:38.000
COSTS WITH DOING THIS MAJOR CHANGE OF GOING
00:10:38.000 --> 00:10:44.000
BACK
00:10:44.000 --> 00:10:49.000
TO A TWO-WAY SYSTEM? WE CAN SEE HOW PEOPLE VOTED BEFORE, AND WE CAN SEE THE
00:10:49.000 --> 00:10:55.000
RESULTS OF THE RECENT SURVEY. EVERYTHING I'VE SEEN POINTS TO THE MAJORITY OF
00:10:55.000 --> 00:11:00.000
PEOPLE NOT WANTING TO SWITCH TO TWO-WAY STREETS. I THINK PEOPLE RECOGNIZE GIVEN
00:11:00.000 --> 00:11:06.000
OUR SITUATION, WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT BIG PROBLEMS IF WE WENT THIS WAY.
IF THE
00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:13.000
COUNCIL IS AT ALL CONSIDERING SWITCHING OUR SYSTEM, I WOULD ASK YOU TO
LISTEN TO
00:11:13.000 --> 00:11:17.000
THE PEOPLE FIRST. I AGREE WITH WHAT HINTON SAID IN A PUBLIC COMMENT IN 2023 WHEN
00:11:17.000 --> 00:11:21.000
SHE SAID PEOPLE VOTED TO TURN MAIN STREET INTO A ONE-WAY STREET, AND
SUPPORTERS
00:11:21.000 --> 00:11:24.000
OF TWO-WAY STREETS WANT TO CHANGE THAT, THEY COULD
00:11:24.000 --> 00:11:29.000
TAKE IT TO THE VOTERS. THANK YOU.
00:11:29.000 --> 00:11:32.000
>> THANK YOU, LISA, FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM.
KATE,
00:11:32.000 --> 00:11:35.000
CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE?
00:11:35.000 --> 00:11:38.000
>> HELLO.
00:11:38.000 --> 00:11:40.000
>> THANK YOU. CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
00:11:40.000 --> 00:11:43.000
>> YES, THANK YOU.
00:11:43.000 --> 00:11:46.000
>> GREAT, GO AHEAD WITH YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE.
00:11:46.000 --> 00:11:49.000
>> COUNCIL AND THE CITY IS PROBABLY AWARE JACK TIBBOTT, FORMERLY OF ST.
VINCENT
00:11:49.000 --> 00:11:52.000
DE PAUL IS NOW RUNNING AS A REPUBLICAN IN THE STATE
00:11:52.000 --> 00:11:56.000
OF OREGON. HIS REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN
00:11:56.000 --> 00:12:00.000
MODE MOTTO, COMMON
00:12:00.000 --> 00:12:05.000
SENSE LEADERSHIP, LESS TAXES, LESS REGULATION. HE MOVED TO OREGON AND SOUGHT
00:12:05.000 --> 00:12:09.000
POLITICAL OFFICE BECAUSE HE WAS, "DISILLUSIONED
00:12:09.000 --> 00:12:16.000
BY CALIFORNIA'S CULTURE AND POLITICAL CLIMATE," AND WANTED SOMETHING
DIFFERENT
00:12:16.000 --> 00:12:22.000
FOR HIS CHILDREN. A PLACE WHERE HIS BOYS COULD BE RAISED WITH STRONG 00:12:22.000 --> 00:12:27.000
VALUES, A SOLID WORK ETHIC, FAITH, SPIRITUALTY, AND A DEEP CONNECTION TO 00:12:27.000 --> 00:12:29.000
AGRICULTURE. I BRING THIS UP BECAUSE JACK MADE MANY PERSONAL GUARANTEES IN
00:12:29.000 --> 00:12:33.000
REGARD TO THE
00:12:33.000 --> 00:12:36.000
CITY'S PARTNERSHIP WITH ST. VINCENT DE PAUL ON
00:12:36.000 --> 00:12:40.000
A PROJECT THAT IS NOW
00:12:40.000 --> 00:12:46.000
UNDERWAY. MANY PEOPLE SAID, INCLUDING MYSELF, HE WAS A CARPET GRIFTER AND HAD NO
00:12:46.000 --> 00:12:49.000
SKIN IN THE GAME WHEN IT CAME TO SEBASTOPOL. HE HAD NO GUILTY ABOUT
PUTTING A
00:12:49.000 --> 00:12:53.000
HOME KEY SITE, ALLOWING ACTIVE DRUG
00:12:53.000 --> 00:12:56.000
USE IN THE MIDDLE SEBASTOPOL'S COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, CLOSE RANGE OF THE PUBLIC
00:12:56.000 --> 00:13:00.000
SCHOOL IN
00:13:00.000 --> 00:13:05.000
A NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FOR FAMILIES. SO HE HAS MOVED TO OREGON TO RUN AS A
00:13:05.000 --> 00:13:10.000
REPUBLICAN, AND THE PEOPLE OF SEBASTOPOL ARE STUCK WITH 00:13:10.000 --> 00:13:14.000
A HORRIBLE AND PERMANENT DEAL. COUNCIL NEEDS TO LEARN AN IMPORTANT LESSON 00:13:14.000 --> 00:13:16.000
THEY'VE NEVER SEENED TO LEARN, WHICH THE DECISIONS THEY MADE MUST BE FOR THE
00:13:16.000 --> 00:13:21.000
BETTERMENT OF
00:13:21.000 --> 00:13:25.000
THEIR RESIDENTS AND SEBASTOPOL BUSINESSES. DO NOT LET
00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:28.000
OUTSIDE
00:13:28.000 --> 00:13:31.000
INTEREST, NON-PROFIT, OR COMMERCIAL, INFLUENCE DECISIONS. IS 00:13:31.000 --> 00:13:37.000
THIS GOOD FOR SEBASTOPOL RESIDENTS? IS THIS
00:13:37.000 --> 00:13:39.000
GOOD FOR SEBASTOPOL OF BUSINESSES? IF THE ANSWER IS NO ON EITHER ACCOUNT, THE
00:13:39.000 --> 00:13:42.000
VOTE MUST BE NO. THANK YOU.
00:13:42.000 --> 00:13:49.000
>> THANK YOU, KATE FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS.
00:13:49.000 --> 00:13:52.000
IF THERE IS ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT ON 00:13:52.000 --> 00:13:55.000
ITEMS NOT --
00:13:55.000 --> 00:14:02.000
>> HI, STEVE PIERCE FROM SEBASTOPOL. I'M FOLLOWING
00:14:02.000 --> 00:14:05.000
UP ON MY WIFE, LISA'S COMMENTS ON THE PARKING TRAFFIC OPTIONS. IT'S 00:14:05.000 --> 00:14:09.000
REALLY
00:14:09.000 --> 00:14:15.000
THE DOWNTOWN PLAN, PRODUCED. OUR CONSULTANTS. I THINK THEY HAD 00:14:15.000 --> 00:14:21.000
A PRUDENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY. THEY SUGGESTED THE CITY GO WITH THE 00:14:21.000 --> 00:14:26.000
WALKABLE ONE-WAY OPTION AND THEN DO SOME CURB LINES ON MAIN STREET TO
MAKE IT
00:14:26.000 --> 00:14:35.000
EASIER IF THE CITY DECIDED IN THE FUTURE TO GO WITH A TWO-WAY OPTION.
THEY ALSO
00:14:35.000 --> 00:14:38.000
RECOMMENDED THAT THERE BE A FEASIBILITY TO STUDY AND SEE, CAN WE EVEN FIT TWO
00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:42.000
LANES OF BICYCLES? TWO LANES OF TRAFFIC ON
00:14:42.000 --> 00:14:50.000
MCKINLEY. SO AS YOU'RE GOING AROUND
00:14:50.000 --> 00:14:54.000
THE PLAZA, DOES THAT ALL FIT? CAN WE REALLY PULL IT OFF? THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
00:14:54.000 --> 00:14:57.000
REJECTED THAT IDEA. THEY DECIDED THAT THEY
00:14:57.000 --> 00:15:03.000
WANTED TO GO WITH THE TOTAL TWO-WAY OPTION WITH SOME MINOR CHANGES. THEY WANTED
00:15:03.000 --> 00:15:07.000
TO ADD SOME PARKING ON MAIN STREET AND SOME WIDER SIDEWALKS THAT WERE A 00:15:07.000 --> 00:15:10.000
PART OF THE WALKABLE ONE-WAY OPTION. THIS IS
00:15:10.000 --> 00:15:15.000
REALLY NOT
00:15:15.000 --> 00:15:20.000
A HYBRID OPTION. IT'S BASICALLY TWO WAYS. YOU
00:15:20.000 --> 00:15:23.000
CAN'T BE PARTLY PREGNANT HERE. WHEN THE CONSULTANTS SAID THERE WOULD BE A 5% TO
00:15:23.000 --> 00:15:29.000
10% INCREASE IN TRAVEL TIME
00:15:29.000 --> 00:15:32.000
WITH ANY OF THE OPTIONS, PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THEY DID NOT INCLUDE ANY OF THE
00:15:32.000 --> 00:15:36.000
BIG WITH IMPACTS FROM LEFT
00:15:36.000 --> 00:15:41.000
TURNS ON A TWO-WAY SCENARIO. YOU CAN PICTURE YOURSELF DRIVING IN THE TWO WAY.
00:15:41.000 --> 00:15:44.000
YOU NEED TO MAKE A LEFT INTO A PARKING LOT ONTO ANOTHER STREET, EVEN INTO YOUR
00:15:44.000 --> 00:15:47.000
OWN DRIVEWAY.
00:15:47.000 --> 00:15:49.000
>> STEVE, YOU HAVE ABOUT 15 SECONDS.
00:15:49.000 --> 00:15:55.000
>> OKAY, AND YOU HAVE TO WAIT FOR THE ONCOMING CARS TO MAKE THAT LEFT.
THAT WAS
00:15:55.000 --> 00:15:59.000
NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE 5 TO 10% INCREASE IN TRAVEL TIME. WHATEVER WE DO,
00:15:59.000 --> 00:16:03.000
WE'RE LOOKING AT HAVING TO DO MATCHING. END OF 20% MATCH. 00:16:03.000 --> 00:16:08.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM IF THERE IS
00:16:08.000 --> 00:16:11.000
ANYONE ON ZOOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR AN ITEM NOT ON
00:16:11.000 --> 00:16:14.000
TONIGHT'S AGENDA. PLEASE
00:16:14.000 --> 00:16:21.000
RAISE YOUR HAND VIRTUALLY? SEEING NONE, I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS. 00:16:21.000 --> 00:16:25.000
>> HI, I AGREE WITH THE PIERCE FAMILY, AND LISA WROTE A VERY GOOD POST ON 00:16:25.000 --> 00:16:32.000
SEBASTOPOL TIMES ON THIS TOPIC. SO I WAS TALKING TONIGHT ABOUT THE
MICAH'S HUGS
00:16:32.000 --> 00:16:35.000
THING BECAUSE THE LAST MEETING, WE HAD A WHOLE ROOM OF PEOPLE. NONE OF WHOM
00:16:35.000 --> 00:16:38.000
LIVED HERE. THEY WERE INSULTING
00:16:38.000 --> 00:16:41.000
AND ASKING THEM TO EDUCATE THEMSELVES ABOUT NARCAN AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. I
00:16:41.000 --> 00:16:45.000
THINK THAT WILL COME
00:16:45.000 --> 00:16:51.000
BACK UP ONTO THE AGENDA THAT WHERE SHE A POLICE
00:16:51.000 --> 00:16:55.000
FORCE AND A FIRE, AND IF YOU FIND SOMEBODY LYING ON THE STREETS AND YOU THINK
00:16:55.000 --> 00:16:59.000
THEY'VE OVERDOSED, THE PROCEDURE IS TO CALL 911. WE'VE SEEN THE POLICE
AND THE
00:16:59.000 --> 00:17:05.000
FIRE SHOW UP, SAVE A WOMAN IN A BURNING
00:17:05.000 --> 00:17:09.000
HOUSE'S LIFE, VERY QUICKLY. A FEW WEEKS AGO. YOU KNOW, WE'RE IN A VERY
DIFFICULT
00:17:09.000 --> 00:17:16.000
SITUATION, WHERE WE HAVE NARCAN LYING AROUND AND PEOPLE WHO ARE MAYBE
DRUNK, TO
00:17:16.000 --> 00:17:20.000
SEE SOMEBODY LYING IN THE GUTTER, WHO MAY BE DIABETIC OR SOMETHING. IT COULD
00:17:20.000 --> 00:17:24.000
CAUSE WAY MORE PROBLEMS. WHEN IT COMES BACK UP FOR THE MICAH'S HUGS
THING, WE
00:17:24.000 --> 00:17:28.000
HAVE TO ASK OURSELVES, WHAT ARE WE ACHIEVING HERE? WE ALREADY HAVE A 00:17:28.000 --> 00:17:34.000
VERY EXPENSIVE POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO -- EMTs ARE WELL EQUIPPED
TO DEAL
00:17:34.000 --> 00:17:38.000
WITH THESE KINDS OF SITUATIONS. SO HAVING OLD NEWSPAPER BOXES WITH NARCAN IS A
00:17:38.000 --> 00:17:43.000
QUESTIONABLE VALUE IN THIS SITUATION. IT MAY COMPLICATE THINGS 00:17:43.000 --> 00:17:49.000
FOR THE PERSON WHO HAS COLLAPSED. SO THE NEXT
00:17:49.000 --> 00:17:54.000
TIME THIS TOPIC COMES UP, IT WILL BE A BUNCH OF PEOPLE SHOUTING WE NEED NARCAN
00:17:54.000 --> 00:18:00.000
EVERYWHERE. IF YOU CARE ABOUT THIS, YOU SHOULD BE CARRYING NARCAN
YOURSELF,
00:18:00.000 --> 00:18:05.000
AND YOU SHOULD BE TAKING PERSONALITY RESPONSIBILITY, NOT EXPECTING THE
CITY TO
00:18:05.000 --> 00:18:09.000
TAKE THAT RISK, POSSIBLY HAVE A LOT OF LEGAL DOWNSIDE TO THAT, IF
SOMEBODY IS
00:18:09.000 --> 00:18:12.000
INJURED THROUGH SOMEBODY THAT DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO USE NARCAN, SO THAT IS MY
00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:15.000
COMMENT. THANK YOU.
00:18:15.000 --> 00:18:17.000
>> THANK YOU, OLIVER FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM.
JIM,
00:18:17.000 --> 00:18:20.000
CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE?
00:18:20.000 --> 00:18:23.000
>> THERE I GO.
00:18:23.000 --> 00:18:26.000
>> CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
00:18:26.000 --> 00:18:28.000
>> I CAN.
00:18:28.000 --> 00:18:31.000
>> GREAT, GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
00:18:31.000 --> 00:18:34.000
>> WILL SO I'M CALLING ALSO ON THE TOPIC OF THE TWO-WAY, ONE-WAY STREETS.
I'M
00:18:34.000 --> 00:18:37.000
NOT IN FAVOR OF ASKING CALTRANS AND GOING OUT AND TRYING TO FIND A WHOLE BUNCH
00:18:37.000 --> 00:18:41.000
OF MONEY, WHICH WE DON'T KNOW IF WE COULD DO THE TWO-WAY STREET THING.
I'VE BEEN
00:18:41.000 --> 00:18:45.000
ON THE FENCE ABOUT IT BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS BETTER. I WASN'T HERE IN
00:18:45.000 --> 00:18:51.000
1985. I DON'T REALLY
00:18:51.000 --> 00:18:55.000
KNOW WHAT IT WAS LIKE. BUT I LOVE LISA'S NICE ARTICLE, LOOKING AT THE HISTORY.
00:18:55.000 --> 00:19:00.000
AND AT THIS POINT, I ALSO DON'T LIKE THE
00:19:00.000 --> 00:19:06.000
PROCESS OF THE CONSULTANT COMING UP WITH FOUR PLANS THAT WERE HARD TO
DECIPHER
00:19:06.000 --> 00:19:13.000
WHAT HAPPENS. THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS. I WORK ON SOUTH MAIN STREET, AND I
00:19:13.000 --> 00:19:20.000
RIDE MY BIKE AROUND TOWN. I FEEL COMFORTABLE THE WAY THINGS ARE. SOUTH MAIN
00:19:20.000 --> 00:19:24.000
STREET, ONE OF THE TWO LANES, HEAD DOWN 116, SOUTH OF TOWN. IT'S TOO FAST AND
00:19:24.000 --> 00:19:28.000
THERE IS TOO MUCH. BUT THEN ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE'S THESE WIDE TIMES WHERE
00:19:28.000 --> 00:19:32.000
THE STOPLIGHT HAS STOPPED ALL TRAFFIC, AND YOU
00:19:32.000 --> 00:19:38.000
CAN GET ACROSS QUITE SAFELY. AND THERE ARE PUSH BUTTONS ON THE LIGHTS YOU COULD
00:19:38.000 --> 00:19:46.000
USE THAT COULD SLOW THE TRAFFIC DOWN. SO I THINK RUSHING INTO SOMETHING 00:19:46.000 --> 00:19:51.000
AND ASSUMING THAT OUR TOWN WANTS TWO WAY IS A MISTAKE. AND I WOULD RATHER DO
00:19:51.000 --> 00:19:55.000
INCREMENTAL CHANGES AND/OR TRY THINGS OUT AND
00:19:55.000 --> 00:19:59.000
EXPERIMENT. WIDER SIDEWALKS DOWNTOWN WOULD BE GREAT. YOU KNOW, THE BIKE LANE
00:19:59.000 --> 00:20:02.000
THING. I COULD GET AROUND WITHOUT NEEDING A LOT OF BIKE LANES. BUT I KNOW 00:20:02.000 --> 00:20:07.000
CALTRANS WILL REQUIRE BIKE LANES AND THAT'S A GOOD THING FOR THE FUTURE.
ANY
00:20:07.000 --> 00:20:11.000
WAY, I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF WHAT CAME OUT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND I WOULD
00:20:11.000 --> 00:20:13.000
LOVE TO TALK SOME MORE WHEN THE CITY COUNCIL
00:20:13.000 --> 00:20:16.000
TAKES IT UP. THANK YOU.
00:20:16.000 --> 00:20:21.000
>> AND ALL RIGHT, I COULD MAKE A COMMENT TOO. NEXT TIME. 00:20:21.000 --> 00:20:26.000
>> OKAY, THANK YOU, JIM, AND I'LL COME BACK TO YOU. IS THERE ANYONE IN
ZOOM, I'M
00:20:26.000 --> 00:20:28.000
SORRY, IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR AN ITEM NOT ON
00:20:28.000 --> 00:20:32.000
TONIGHT'S AGENDA? PLEASE COME
00:20:32.000 --> 00:20:38.000
UP TO THE PODIUM.
00:20:38.000 --> 00:20:41.000
>> GOOD MORNING, LONG DAY, GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS CRAIG, AND I'M IN THE 00:20:41.000 --> 00:20:46.000
CLUB, AND I'M A GRANGER, SEBASTOPOL GRANGE. FIRST OFF, THANK YOU TO THE SCOUTS
00:20:46.000 --> 00:20:51.000
FOR EVERYTHING YOU DO FOR US, FOR THE THIRD OF JULY. I'M HERE TONIGHT TO TALK
00:20:51.000 --> 00:20:54.000
ABOUT THE BOX BUILD THAT'S HAPPENING ON SUNDAY, APRIL 12. IT'S FROM 11:00 TO
00:20:54.000 --> 00:20:58.000
3:00. LAST YEAR,
00:20:58.000 --> 00:21:01.000
WE BUILT 37 GARDEN BOXES FOR THE COMMUNITY. WE GAVE THEM AWAY TO FOLKS WHO
00:21:01.000 --> 00:21:06.000
WANTED TO GROW
00:21:06.000 --> 00:21:09.000
HABITAT FOR GOOD PLANTS OR SPECIES AND ALSO FOR FOLKS WHO WERE FEELING FOOD
00:21:09.000 --> 00:21:12.000
INSECURE. SO THAT WAS A COLLABORATION
00:21:12.000 --> 00:21:16.000
LAST YEAR BETWEEN THE SEBASTOPOL GRANGE 306 AND THE CLUB OF SEBASTOPOL.
THIS
00:21:16.000 --> 00:21:19.000
YEAR WE'RE DOING IT AGAIN, APRIL 12,
00:21:19.000 --> 00:21:23.000
FROM 11:00 A.M. TO 3:00
00:21:23.000 --> 00:21:27.000
P.M. AGAIN AT THE SEBASTOPOL GRANGE, EXCEPT, THE DRUM ROLL, PLEASE. THE LION'S
00:21:27.000 --> 00:21:30.000
CLUB IS JOINING US AS WELL. SO NOW WE'VE ADDED A THIRD GROUP, AND WE HAVE THREE
00:21:30.000 --> 00:21:35.000
OF US WORKING TOGETHER, COLLABORATIVELY. I'D LIKE TO INVITE THE CITY TO
COME ON
00:21:35.000 --> 00:21:40.000
OUT IF YOU'D LIKE TO. THE SCOUTS, OF COURSE, AND AGAIN, THANK YOU TO THE SCOUTS
00:21:40.000 --> 00:21:44.000
FOR ALL THE WORK YOU DO FOR QUANTUS CLUB IN OUR COMMUNITY. 00:21:44.000 --> 00:21:47.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. DID YOU
00:21:47.000 --> 00:21:50.000
WANT
00:21:50.000 --> 00:21:52.000
TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT?
00:21:52.000 --> 00:21:55.000
>> YES, PLEASE.
00:21:55.000 --> 00:21:58.000
>> ALL RIGHT, CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER STILL?
00:21:58.000 --> 00:22:01.000
>> YES.
00:22:01.000 --> 00:22:03.000
>> OKAY. GO AHEAD WITH YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE.
00:22:03.000 --> 00:22:07.000
>> OKAY, THANKS. I'M GOING TO READ THE COMMENT I PUT IN THE SEBASTOPOL TIMES
00:22:07.000 --> 00:22:12.000
AFTER LISA'S PIECE. LISA PIERCE'S PIECE. KUDOS AND GRATITUDE TO LISA
PIERCE, WHO
00:22:12.000 --> 00:22:15.000
STUDIED THE HISTORY OF OUR TOWN FOR MANY, MANY YEARS, MADE VIDEOS ABOUT
IT, AND
00:22:15.000 --> 00:22:19.000
CAREFULLY
00:22:19.000 --> 00:22:24.000
STUDIED MAPS AND PLANS. FOR HER CONSCIENTIOUS CLEAR-HEADED RECOUNTING OF 00:22:24.000 --> 00:22:30.000
RELEVANT HISTORY. WHY REPEAT MISTAKES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN MADE? ANY
SOLUTION
00:22:30.000 --> 00:22:34.000
THAT COULD INCREASE TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AND GRIDLOCK MUST BE DEEPLY
SCRUTINIZED
00:22:34.000 --> 00:22:38.000
AND NOT RUSHED THROUGH. CONSULTANTS WHO DON'T LIVE HERE, REMEMBER, THE
IVES PARK
00:22:38.000 --> 00:22:43.000
PROPOSAL TO DO AWAY WITH OUR BELOVED BALL FIELD? EVEN OUR LOCAL PLANNING 00:22:43.000 --> 00:22:48.000
COMMISSION, NO MATTER HOW WELL INTENTIONED OR VISIONARY ARE NOT
THEMSELVES
00:22:48.000 --> 00:22:55.000
ELECTED OFFICIALS, BUT CAN HAVE AN OUTSIZED INFLUENCE OVER THEM AND OVER THE
00:22:55.000 --> 00:23:00.000
TOWN WITH LITTLE TO NO ACCOUNTABILITY WHEN THINGS GO WRONG, I MIGHT ADD OR IF
00:23:00.000 --> 00:23:03.000
AND WHEN. AND EVEN THOUGH WALKING AND BICYCLING TO TOWN ARE IDEAL OPTIONS TO
00:23:03.000 --> 00:23:10.000
PROMOTE FOR THE NEARBY AND
00:23:10.000 --> 00:23:15.000
THE ABLE-BODIED, THEY ARE NOT VIABLE FOR COASTAL TOWNS BEYOND PUBLIC
TRANSIT OR
00:23:15.000 --> 00:23:20.000
FOR VISITORS OR PASSER THROUGHS FROM FAR AWAY. WE STILL MUST CONSIDER
DRIVERS,
00:23:20.000 --> 00:23:26.000
TRAFFIC FLOWS, AND PARKING ISSUES, AS CARS ARE A CURRENT REALITY IN A
RURAL TOWN
00:23:26.000 --> 00:23:30.000
WITH A COUPLE CITY BLOCKS AND TWO STATE HIGHWAYS PASSING THROUGH. LET'S PLEASE
00:23:30.000 --> 00:23:32.000
BE KIND TO ALL PARTIES INVOLVED,
00:23:32.000 --> 00:23:36.000
INCLUDING OUR BELOVED LOCAL BUSINESSES. THANK YOU.
00:23:36.000 --> 00:23:41.000
>> THANK YOU, KERRY FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS.
00:23:41.000 --> 00:23:45.000
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE
00:23:45.000 --> 00:23:48.000
AGENDA? SEEING NONE, I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. ROBERT, CAN YOU UNMUTE
YOURSELF,
00:23:48.000 --> 00:23:51.000
PLEASE? >> YES.
00:23:51.000 --> 00:23:53.000
>> THANK YOU. CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
00:23:53.000 --> 00:23:56.000
>> YEAH.
00:23:56.000 --> 00:23:59.000
>> GO AHEAD WITH YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE.
00:23:59.000 --> 00:24:02.000
>> THIS IS QUICK. JUST TO ADD TO OLIVER'S COMMENT ON THE NARCAN BOXES. 00:24:02.000 --> 00:24:08.000
PARTICULARLY THE INPUT WE GOT FROM A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT APPARENTLY DON'T
LIVE IN
00:24:08.000 --> 00:24:14.000
SEBASTOPOL AND HAVE NO REAL SKIN IN THE GAME. ONE OF THE COMMENTERS, I
BELIEVE
00:24:14.000 --> 00:24:19.000
WAS HEAD OF A GROUP, NON-PROFIT GROUP. SAID THIS IS HAPPENING 00:24:19.000 --> 00:24:27.000
ALL OVER THE STATE. IN FACT, QUOTED THE SPECIFIC PLACE WHERE THESE BOXES WERE
00:24:27.000 --> 00:24:31.000
BEING PLACED, YOU KNOW, WE'RE BEHIND THE TIMES, I GUESS. I HAPPEN TO BE IN SAN
00:24:31.000 --> 00:24:34.000
LUI S OBISPO AND THEY'RE NOT PUTTING BOXES ON THE STREETS. THEY DID PUT SOME
00:24:34.000 --> 00:24:39.000
SMALL BOXES THAT LOOKED LIKE A FIRST AID KIT THAT HANG ON THE WALL INSIDE PUBLIC
00:24:39.000 --> 00:24:46.000
BUILDINGS AT A LEVEL THAT WAS SUFFICIENTLY HIGH ENOUGH THAT CHILDREN
WOULDN'T BE
00:24:46.000 --> 00:24:52.000
PLAYING WITH IT, MAKING IT ACCESSIBLE BROADLY IN THE CITY. BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT
00:24:52.000 --> 00:24:58.000
WAS BEING DISCUSSED AT THE MEETING. I THINK WE WERE BEING MISLED BY
PEOPLE WHO
00:24:58.000 --> 00:25:01.000
GAVE THIS ADVICE TO US. SOMEHOW WE HAVE TO TURN ON OUR SPIDEY SENSES AND SENSE
00:25:01.000 --> 00:25:03.000
WHEN THINGS DON'T MAKE SENSE. THANK YOU.
00:25:03.000 --> 00:25:06.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL COME BACK INTO PUBLIC CHAMBERS.
00:25:06.000 --> 00:25:09.000
IF THERE IS ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE
00:25:09.000 --> 00:25:14.000
A
00:25:14.000 --> 00:25:24.000
COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT --
00:25:24.000 --> 00:25:27.000
>> HI, MY NAME IS RUSSELL. I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK
00:25:27.000 --> 00:25:31.000
TONIGHT. I AM THE SENIOR PATROL
00:25:31.000 --> 00:25:35.000
LEADER OF SCOUTING AMERICA SEBASTOPOL TROOP 27, AND I'M PROUD TO BE HERE
WITH MY
00:25:35.000 --> 00:25:38.000
AMAZING TROOP BESIDE ME, AS WELL AS THOSE WHO COULD NOT BE HERE TODAY,
SUCH AS
00:25:38.000 --> 00:25:42.000
MY SCOUT MASTER,
00:25:42.000 --> 00:25:46.000
MR. GRAVES. WE ARE AN ORGANIZATION THAT VALUES LEADERSHIP AND CIVIC DUTY.AS PART
00:25:46.000 --> 00:25:52.000
OF THIS, WE'VE BEEN PUTTING UP FLAGS ON MAIN STREET SINCE AT LEAST 00:25:52.000 --> 00:25:57.000
THE 1990s. WE DO THIS ON MOST STATE AND FEDERAL HOLIDAYS, WHICH IS VERY
POPULAR
00:25:57.000 --> 00:26:00.000
TO THE PEOPLE OF SEBASTOPOL. PEOPLE THANK US AND THEY HAVE ASKED US WHY THE
00:26:00.000 --> 00:26:03.000
FLAGS AREN'T UP WHEN
00:26:03.000 --> 00:26:07.000
WE UNFORTUNATELY CANNOT DO IT. HOWEVER, RECENTLY WE'VE RAN INTO AN ISSUE.
WE
00:26:07.000 --> 00:26:12.000
HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO POST FLAGS RECENTLY AS IT HAS COME TO OUR ATTENTION WE
00:26:12.000 --> 00:26:16.000
POTENTIALLY NEED A PERMIT FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL INSTANCE OF CARRYING OUT THIS
00:26:16.000 --> 00:26:21.000
COMMUNITY SERVICE. THIS IS PROVEN TO BE A LENGTHY PROCESS, AND WE OFTEN CANNOT
00:26:21.000 --> 00:26:25.000
GET A PERMIT IN TIME. SO WE ARE HERE AS A TROOP TO RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE
00:26:25.000 --> 00:26:29.000
FOLLOWING. WE ASK THE CITY AMEND ITS ORDINANCE REGARDING PERMITTING
POSTING OF
00:26:29.000 --> 00:26:36.000
FLAGS ON MAIN STREET. WE'RE ASKING THE ORDINANCE EXPLICITLY 00:26:36.000 --> 00:26:38.000
ALLOW FOR THE POSTING OF U.S. FLAGS ON MAIN STREET. WE ALSO ASK THE
SERVICE WILL
00:26:38.000 --> 00:26:43.000
BE CONDUCTED IN PERPETUITY BY
00:26:43.000 --> 00:26:47.000
AN ORGANIZATION OF THE CITY'S CHOOSING, AND HUMBLY ASK THAT TROOP 27 00:26:47.000 --> 00:26:52.000
BE RECOGNIZED AS THAT ORGANIZATION. SO YOU MAY BE ASKING WHY SHOULD TROOP 27 BE
00:26:52.000 --> 00:26:56.000
THE ONES TO PROVIDE THIS IMPORTANT SERVICE? SO I'D LIKE TO POINT OUT THE SCOUTS
00:26:56.000 --> 00:27:00.000
WHO ARE HERE WITH ME TONIGHT. NONE OF THEM ARE HERE BECAUSE THEY WERE
FORCED TO
00:27:00.000 --> 00:27:04.000
BE. THEY'RE ALL HERE BECAUSE THEY WANT TO HAVE A PART IN CONTINUING TO
PROVIDE
00:27:04.000 --> 00:27:07.000
SAFE AND CHEERFUL SERVICE TO THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL. WE'VE CARRIED THIS OUT
00:27:07.000 --> 00:27:10.000
SUCCESSFULLY FOR DECADES AS A PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY AND OUR
ORGANIZATION,
00:27:10.000 --> 00:27:13.000
WHICH WE HOPE TO CONTINUE.
00:27:13.000 --> 00:27:16.000
>> YOU HAVE ABOUT TEN SECONDS LEFT.
00:27:16.000 --> 00:27:19.000
>> THANK YOU. WORKING WITH THE CITY IS VERY VALUABLE TO US, AS IT LETS US 00:27:19.000 --> 00:27:23.000
DEMONSTRATE OUR CIVIC PRIDE AND ENGAGE WITH THE VIBRANT COMMUNITY OF SEBASTOPOL.
00:27:23.000 --> 00:27:26.000
IF ANYMORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED, I'D BE HAPPY TO PROVIDE FURTHER DETAILS. ON
00:27:26.000 --> 00:27:30.000
BEHALF OF THE ENTIRETY OF TROOP 27, I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING OUR
00:27:30.000 --> 00:27:34.000
REQUEST. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL 00:27:34.000 --> 00:27:39.000
GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. OMAR,
00:27:39.000 --> 00:27:47.000
CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE?
00:27:47.000 --> 00:27:50.000
>> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, STAFF, AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC.
00:27:50.000 --> 00:27:55.000
I AM SPEAKING OUT IN FULL
00:27:55.000 --> 00:28:01.000
FAVOR OF THE LAST COMMENT. I THINK THAT THE SCOUTING OF AMERICA PROVIDES AN
00:28:01.000 --> 00:28:08.000
INCREDIBLE SERVICE TO THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, WHEN WE HAVE THE FLAGS EACH 00:28:08.000 --> 00:28:13.000
HOLIDAY, AND I WANT TO THANK HIM FOR THAT. AS SOMEBODY WHO IS PROUD TO
LIVE IN
00:28:13.000 --> 00:28:19.000
SEBASTOPOL, I THINK MY SENSE OF CIVIC PRIDE IS HYPHENED EVERY TIME I SEE THE
00:28:19.000 --> 00:28:23.000
FLAGS, AND I DIDN'T KNOW WHO PUT THEM UP, BUT I WANT TO THANK ALL OF YOU SCOUTS
00:28:23.000 --> 00:28:29.000
FOR DOING THAT. YOU'VE DONE REALLY WELL FOR OUR COMMUNITY, AND THANK YOU FOR
00:28:29.000 --> 00:28:32.000
SPEAKING OUT TODAY AND FOR SHOWING UP, AND FOR YOUR COMMUNITY SERVICE. SO I'M
00:28:32.000 --> 00:28:36.000
100% IN FAVOR OF THIS. THANK YOU.
00:28:36.000 --> 00:28:40.000
>> THANK YOU, OMAR FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS.
00:28:40.000 --> 00:28:45.000
THIS WOULD BE THE TENTH SPEAKER, SO THIS WOULD BE OUR 20-MINUTE TIME
LIMIT, SO I
00:28:45.000 --> 00:28:49.000
HAVE ONE MR. SPEAKER, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT. PLEASE COME
00:28:49.000 --> 00:28:53.000
UP TO THE PODIUM. SEEING NONE, I'LL
00:28:53.000 --> 00:28:55.000
GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. MYRIAH,
00:28:55.000 --> 00:29:01.000
CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE?
00:29:01.000 --> 00:29:06.000
>> I CAN, HI, EVERYBODY, GOOD EVENING. I'M JUST TAKING THIS OPPORTUNITY TO HOP
00:29:06.000 --> 00:29:09.000
ON REGARDING THE APPLE BLOSSOM FESTIVAL COMING UP, APRIL 25 AND 26. WE'RE DEEP
00:29:09.000 --> 00:29:12.000
INTO THE PLANNING FOR THE FESTIVAL. EVERYTHING
00:29:12.000 --> 00:29:17.000
IS GOING REALLY WELL. WE'VE GOT SOME REALLY FUN SURPRISES WITH YOU WITH THE
00:29:17.000 --> 00:29:21.000
WIZARD OF OZ THEME. I THINK IT WILL BE A GREAT WEEKEND. THAT BEING 00:29:21.000 --> 00:29:27.000
SAID, MY REASON FOR COMING TONIGHT AMONG OTHER REASONS I WANT TO HEAR
ABOUT ALL
00:29:27.000 --> 00:29:29.000
THE OTHER ISSUES THAT YOU ALL ARE DEALING WITH AT THE MOMENT IS VOLUNTEERS.
00:29:29.000 --> 00:29:34.000
VOLUNTEERS FOR THE FESTIVAL ARE CRUCIAL
00:29:34.000 --> 00:29:39.000
TO MAKE A SUCCESSFUL EVENT. WE NEED ABOUT 150 PEOPLE TO HAVE A STRONG
VOLUNTEER
00:29:39.000 --> 00:29:44.000
TEAM OVER THE COURSE OF THE WEEKEND. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE INVOLVED AND
00:29:44.000 --> 00:29:47.000
VOLUNTEER, YOU CAN GO TO APPLEBLOSSOMFEST.COM. THERE'S A LINK FOR
VOLUNTEERING,
00:29:47.000 --> 00:29:51.000
AND WE APPRECIATE IT. YOU GET
00:29:51.000 --> 00:29:56.000
FREE TICKETS TO THE EVENT, AND REALLY CUTE TIE DYE T-SHIRT, SO THANK YOU. 00:29:56.000 --> 00:30:00.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. SO MAYOR,
00:30:00.000 --> 00:30:03.000
THAT IS THE 20-MINUTE TIME LIMIT FOR THE FIRST PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. 00:30:03.000 --> 00:30:08.000
>> OKAY. THANK YOU.
00:30:08.000 --> 00:30:11.000
>> THANK YOU, EVERYONE FOR YOUR COMMENTS. AND WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ONTO - - OH,
00:30:11.000 --> 00:30:14.000
I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD.
00:30:14.000 --> 00:30:18.000
>> I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR COMING TONIGHT TO THE BOY SCOUT GROUP, AND TO
LET YOU
00:30:18.000 --> 00:30:25.000
KNOW THAT I WILL BE SURE TO BRING AN AMENDMENT
00:30:25.000 --> 00:30:30.000
BACK FOR THE FLAG POLICY. SO IF YOU CAN GET YOUR LETTER TO OUR INTERIM CITY
00:30:30.000 --> 00:30:32.000
MANAGER, I'LL FOLLOW UP,
00:30:32.000 --> 00:30:35.000
OKAY? THANK YOU.
00:30:35.000 --> 00:30:38.000
>> ANYONE ELSE? OKAY. OH.
00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:43.000
>> I ALSO WANT TO THANK THE SCOUT TROOP FOR DOING THIS SO OFTEN. YOU
KNOW, NOT
00:30:43.000 --> 00:30:45.000
MANY PEOPLE KNOW WHO IT IS, SO IT'S GREAT FOR YOU TO COME UP AND PUT IT OUT
00:30:45.000 --> 00:30:48.000
THERE. HOPEFULLY WE CAN RECOGNIZE YOU GUYS
00:30:48.000 --> 00:30:54.000
A LITTLE BIT BETTER. THANK YOU.
00:30:54.000 --> 00:30:58.000
>> OKAY, ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO OUR
CONSENT
00:30:58.000 --> 00:31:05.000
CALENDAR. LET'S SEE. SO NUMBER ONE, APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR
00:31:05.000 --> 00:31:09.000
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3, 2026. APPROVAL OF SECOND READING FOR THE FORMULA
BUSINESS
00:31:09.000 --> 00:31:15.000
ORDINANCE UPDATES. UPDATES TO THE FORMULA BUSINESS ORDINANCE 00:31:15.000 --> 00:31:20.000
TO CLARIFY APPLICABILITY AND TERMS. SEBASTOPOL KIWANIS CLUB, NUMBER
THREE, TO
00:31:20.000 --> 00:31:25.000
CONDUCT THEIR ANNUAL FIREWORKS SHOW ON JULY 3, 2026 LOCATED ON PUBLIC
PROPERTY
00:31:25.000 --> 00:31:29.000
OF THE WEST SONOMA COUNTY
00:31:29.000 --> 00:31:36.000
UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, ANALY AVENUE, SEBASTOPOL, AND 00:31:36.000 --> 00:31:40.000
FINDING THIS ACTION EXEMPT UNDER CEQA SECTION 15304E. NUMBER FOUR.
APPROVAL OF
00:31:40.000 --> 00:31:45.000
PROCESS FOR TRANSITION TO
00:31:45.000 --> 00:31:51.000
SONOMA COUNTY PERMIT, FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION, ITEM FOR THE CITY OF
SEBASTOPOL
00:31:51.000 --> 00:31:56.000
TO FILE A FORMAL RELINQUISHMENT LETTER WITH CAL
00:31:56.000 --> 00:32:02.000
EPA UNDER HSC 25404.3F, REQUESTING THAT CERTIFIED
00:32:02.000 --> 00:32:05.000
UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY, CUPA, AUTHORITY FOR SEBASTOPOL BE ASSIGNED TO 00:32:05.000 --> 00:32:11.000
SONOMA COUNTY PERMIT, SONOMA-FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION CUPA, AND AUTHORIZE THE
00:32:11.000 --> 00:32:15.000
CITY MANAGER TO WORK WITH GOLD RIDGE TO EXECUTE AND SUBMIT ALL REQUIRED 00:32:15.000 --> 00:32:20.000
NOTICES, CORRESPONDENCE,AND TRANSITION DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE
00:32:20.000 --> 00:32:26.000
TRANSFER. IF APPROVED BY CAL EPA, GOLD RIDGE AND CITY STAFF WILL RETURN WITH
00:32:26.000 --> 00:32:29.000
REMAINING ACTION ITEMS AS LISTED LATER IN THE REPORT. SO DOES ANYONE WANT TO
00:32:29.000 --> 00:32:32.000
PULL
00:32:32.000 --> 00:32:36.000
ANY ITEMS FROM CONSENT CALENDAR? NO? OKAY. THEN WE'LL GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
00:32:36.000 --> 00:32:39.000
>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. SO THIS IS PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
00:32:39.000 --> 00:32:44.000
JUST READ. IF YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THOSE FOUR CONSENT
CALENDAR
00:32:44.000 --> 00:32:51.000
ITEMS, AGAIN, IT IS A TWO-MINUTE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD, AND I'LL COME INTO
00:32:51.000 --> 00:32:54.000
CHAMBERS FIRST, THEN GO OUT TO ZOOM. DO YOU HAVE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE
CONSENT
00:32:54.000 --> 00:33:00.000
CALENDAR ITEM?
00:33:00.000 --> 00:33:04.000
>> WELL THANK YOU FOR WELCOMING ME. MAYOR, MADAM MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, AND WORTHY
00:33:04.000 --> 00:33:09.000
CLERK AND ATTORNEY AND FINANCIAL CHAIR. I'M A MEMBER OF THE KIWANIS, AND I WANT
00:33:09.000 --> 00:33:13.000
TO EXPRESS HOW WONDERFUL IT WAS TO USE THE SPACE AROUND THE COMMUNITY CENTER
00:33:13.000 --> 00:33:16.000
LAST YEAR TO TRANSFORM THE FIREWORKS FROM A BACK-TO-SCHOOL NIGHT AT THE
SCHOOL,
00:33:16.000 --> 00:33:20.000
WHICH WAS A GREAT TRADITION,
00:33:20.000 --> 00:33:26.000
TO A TOWN PICNIC. I THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING US TO USE THE SPACE AGAIN, AND I
00:33:26.000 --> 00:33:29.000
REALLY LOOK FORWARD TO PUTTING ON THIS YEAR'S TOWN PICNIC IN CONJUNCTION BY
00:33:29.000 --> 00:33:32.000
COHORT AT THE KIWANIS.
00:33:32.000 --> 00:33:35.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. IF THERE
00:33:35.000 --> 00:33:38.000
IS ANYONE ON ZOOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THE
CONSENT
00:33:38.000 --> 00:33:42.000
CALENDAR ITEMS ONLY,
00:33:42.000 --> 00:33:46.000
PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND VIRTUALLY? SEEING NONE, WE'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS. IF
00:33:46.000 --> 00:33:49.000
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THE
CONSENT
00:33:49.000 --> 00:33:54.000
CALENDAR ITEMS ONLY, PLEASE
00:33:54.000 --> 00:33:57.000
COME UP TO THE PODIUM. SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENT IS CLOSED ON THE
CONSENT
00:33:57.000 --> 00:34:00.000
CALENDAR ITEMS. >> OKAY. SO WE'RE BACK HERE. IF ANYONE
00:34:00.000 --> 00:34:02.000
HAS ANY COMMENTS OR MOTION?
00:34:02.000 --> 00:34:05.000
>> I MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
00:34:05.000 --> 00:34:08.000
>> I'LL SECOND.
00:34:08.000 --> 00:34:11.000
>> THANK YOU, SO MOVED BY VICE MAYOR MAURER AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER 00:34:11.000 --> 00:34:13.000
ZOLLMAN TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR
00:34:13.000 --> 00:34:16.000
ITEMS ONE THROUGH FOUR. COUNCILMEMBER CARTER?
00:34:16.000 --> 00:34:19.000
>> YES.
00:34:19.000 --> 00:34:22.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER HINTON?
00:34:22.000 --> 00:34:24.000
>> AYE.
00:34:24.000 --> 00:34:27.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN?
00:34:27.000 --> 00:34:30.000
>> YES.
00:34:30.000 --> 00:34:33.000
>> VICE MAYOR MAURER?
00:34:33.000 --> 00:34:35.000
>> YES.
00:34:35.000 --> 00:34:38.000
>> MAYOR MCLEWIS?
00:34:38.000 --> 00:34:41.000
>> YES.
00:34:41.000 --> 00:34:44.000
>> MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
00:34:44.000 --> 00:34:46.000
>> PERFECT. WE ARE MOVING RIGHT ALONG. WE ARE AT THE POINT FOR
INFORMATION ITEMS
00:34:46.000 --> 00:34:49.000
AND PRESENTATIONS, NUMBER 5. GOVERNMENT SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ANNUAL REPORT OUT.
00:34:49.000 --> 00:34:52.000
ANNUAL REPORT OF DEPARTMENT'S GOVERNMENT SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT. I BELIEVE -- WILL
00:34:52.000 --> 00:34:55.000
OUR CHIEF BE DOING THIS ITEM?
00:34:55.000 --> 00:34:57.000
>> MAYOR, THERE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE CALENDAR AND WILL BE POSTPONED.
IT'S
00:34:57.000 --> 00:35:00.000
BEEN NOTICED ON THE AGENDA THAT WAY.
00:35:00.000 --> 00:35:03.000
>> OH, I'M SORRY.
00:35:03.000 --> 00:35:06.000
>> THAT'S OKAY. SO WE'LL GO NEXT TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. 00:35:06.000 --> 00:35:08.000
>> I MADE A NOTE ON THE DIFFERENT AGENDA AND THEN I PRINTED A NEW ONE.
ALL
00:35:08.000 --> 00:35:11.000
RIGHT. WE WILL MOVE TO NUMBER SIX. BOLD PROGRAM PARTICIPATION DISCUSSION AND
00:35:11.000 --> 00:35:14.000
ACTION. ITEM INCLUDES A PRESENTATION OF CMFA'S BOLD PROGRAM, A RESOLUTION 00:35:14.000 --> 00:35:17.000
JOINING THE CMFA, AND A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE BOLD
PROGRAM
00:35:17.000 --> 00:35:19.000
FOR THE CANOPY HOUSING PROJECT. ALL COSTS CAN BE REIMBURSED THROUGH THE BOLD
00:35:19.000 --> 00:35:22.000
PROGRAM. AND THIS, I BELIEVE, IS OUR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, PLANNING, A LOT OF
00:35:22.000 --> 00:35:26.000
DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS THERE.
00:35:26.000 --> 00:35:32.000
>> I'LL KICK US OFF, MAYOR. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL. SO THIS IS 00:35:32.000 --> 00:35:37.000
AN ITEM THAT'S BEING BROUGHT TO YOU BY -- ON BEHALF OF THE 00:35:37.000 --> 00:35:41.000
DEVELOPER OF THE CANOPY PROJECT
00:35:41.000 --> 00:35:44.000
WITHIN THE CITY. THEY'RE REQUESTING THE CITY AUTHORIZE
00:35:44.000 --> 00:35:49.000
PARTICIPATION IN
00:35:49.000 --> 00:35:57.000
THE BOLD PROGRAM, WHICH IS A TOOL, A FINANCING TOOL THAT WILL HELP THEM
PAY THE
00:35:57.000 --> 00:36:00.000
IMPACT FEE THE CITY IMPOSES ON NEW DEVELOPMENT. IT IS AT NO COST TO THE
CITY AND
00:36:00.000 --> 00:36:08.000
NO RISK OR LIABILITY FOR THE CITY, BUT IT
00:36:08.000 --> 00:36:13.000
DOES NEED THE CITY'S APPROVAL. AND WITH THAT, I'LL TURN IT OVER, I
THOUGHT I SAW
00:36:13.000 --> 00:36:18.000
SOME FROM CITY IN THE AUDIENCE,
00:36:18.000 --> 00:36:28.000
BUT MAYBE THEY'RE JUST ONLINE.
00:36:28.000 --> 00:36:31.000
>> I'M GOING TO ASK JEAN WHO WILL BE PRESENTING CANOPY FOR THE BOLD PROJECT.
00:36:31.000 --> 00:36:34.000
JEAN, I'M GOING
00:36:34.000 --> 00:36:37.000
TO
00:36:37.000 --> 00:36:43.000
MUTE YOU HERE REAL QUICK.
00:36:43.000 --> 00:36:48.000
JANE, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF AND LET US KNOW WHO NEEDS ACCESS FROM THE CANOPY
00:36:48.000 --> 00:36:52.000
PROJECT IN BOLD TO PROVIDE THE PRESENTATION?
00:36:52.000 --> 00:36:55.000
>> HI, YEAH. I DON'T SEE ANYONE WHOSE NAME I RECOGNIZE ON HERE RIGHT NOW, IF YOU
00:36:55.000 --> 00:36:57.000
ARE ON
00:36:57.000 --> 00:37:00.000
HERE,
00:37:00.000 --> 00:37:04.000
CAN YOU RAISE YOUR HAND?
00:37:04.000 --> 00:37:07.000
>> I BELIEVE RALPH IS HERE TO MAKE THE PRESENTATION AS WELL 00:37:07.000 --> 00:37:12.000
OR TO ANSWER ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.
00:37:12.000 --> 00:37:15.000
>> YES, THERE WE
00:37:15.000 --> 00:37:17.000
GO.
00:37:17.000 --> 00:37:21.000
>> GOOD EVENING. I BELIEVE THERE WAS SOMEONE FROM CITY VENTURES WHO WAS
GOING TO
00:37:21.000 --> 00:37:24.000
START THE PRESENTATION, BUT IF NOT, I COULD GO
00:37:24.000 --> 00:37:28.000
AHEAD AND JUMP INTO IT.
00:37:28.000 --> 00:37:31.000
>> WE JUST STARTED YOUR ITEM. I GAVE
00:37:31.000 --> 00:37:36.000
A LITTLE INTRODUCTION, BUT IF YOU
00:37:36.000 --> 00:37:41.000
WANT TO -- YEAH, PERFECT.
00:37:41.000 --> 00:37:46.000
>> DO
00:37:46.000 --> 00:37:50.000
WE HAVE THE SLIDES AVAILABLE?
00:37:50.000 --> 00:37:54.000
>> GIVE US
00:37:54.000 --> 00:37:56.000
A SECOND.
00:37:56.000 --> 00:37:59.000
>> GREAT.
00:37:59.000 --> 00:38:04.000
>> PLEASE.
00:38:04.000 --> 00:38:10.000
>> WELL, WHILE WE'RE PULLING UP THE SLIDES, MY NAME IS KELSO. THANK YOU, MAYOR
00:38:10.000 --> 00:38:14.000
MCLEWIS, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. TONIGHT, OUR REQUEST IS OUTLINED IN THE 00:38:14.000 --> 00:38:19.000
STAFF REPORT, BUT THE OVERALL REQUEST IS FOR THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL TO
JOIN THE
00:38:19.000 --> 00:38:25.000
CMFA, WHICH IS THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL
00:38:25.000 --> 00:38:28.000
FINANCE AUTHORITY, WHICH WILL THEN ALLOW OUR COMPANY TO APPLY FOR THE BOLD
00:38:28.000 --> 00:38:31.000
FINANCING PROJECT, WHICH
00:38:31.000 --> 00:38:34.000
IS AN 80 TOWNHOME
00:38:34.000 --> 00:38:38.000
DEVELOPMENT BEING CONSTRUCTED IN
00:38:38.000 --> 00:38:42.000
NORTH SEBASTOPOL, WHICH WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2024. THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVED IT
00:38:42.000 --> 00:38:50.000
IN APRIL OF 2024 IN THE FINAL MAP THAT WAS
00:38:50.000 --> 00:38:56.000
APPROVED IN DECEMBER OF 2024. SO THAT'S OUR REQUEST TONIGHT, AND WE HAVE WITH
00:38:56.000 --> 00:39:01.000
US, RALPH HOLMES WHO SHOULD BE ON ZOOM TO BE ABLE TO -- HE'S A 00:39:01.000 --> 00:39:04.000
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BOLD PROGRAM. HE'LL BE ABLE TO GO OVER 00:39:04.000 --> 00:39:07.000
HOW -- OH, HERE WE ARE.
00:39:07.000 --> 00:39:11.000
>> CAN YOU LET ME KNOW WHEN TO MOVE FORWARD FOR YOUR SLIDE PRESENTATION? 00:39:11.000 --> 00:39:15.000
>> YEAH, WE CAN MOVE FORWARD. SO THIS WAS JUST THE AGENDA, LIKE THE
OBJECTIVE
00:39:15.000 --> 00:39:24.000
THAT I DESCRIBED WHAT THE OBJECTIVE IS AND
00:39:24.000 --> 00:39:28.000
THE REQUEST IS. IF YOU CAN GO TO THE NEXT. NEXT SLIDE. THIS COMES FROM
THE STAFF
00:39:28.000 --> 00:39:31.000
REPORT. YOU KNOW, THE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW US TO APPLY FOR THE BOLD
PROGRAM, AND
00:39:31.000 --> 00:39:36.000
FOR THE CITY
00:39:36.000 --> 00:39:43.000
OF SEBASTOPOL TO JOIN THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY. THE
NEXT SLIDE
00:39:43.000 --> 00:39:48.000
SORT OF DISCUSSES WHAT THAT AUTHORITY IS. AND RALPH WILL THEN TAKE IT
OVER TO
00:39:48.000 --> 00:39:52.000
DESCRIBE WHAT THE BOLD PROGRAM IS IN DETAIL, AND THEN I'LL BE HERE TO
ANSWER ANY
00:39:52.000 --> 00:39:57.000
QUESTIONS SPECIFICALLY THAT YOU MAY HAVE AS IT RELATES TO THE CANOPY. 00:39:57.000 --> 00:40:00.000
SPECIFICALLY THE REQUEST TONIGHT TO ALLOW US TO APPLY
00:40:00.000 --> 00:40:04.000
TO JOIN THE BOLD PROGRAMS. THE RESOLUTION ONLY SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZES
THAT BOLD
00:40:04.000 --> 00:40:07.000
PROGRAM TO BE ALLOWED FOR THE CANOPY PROJECT, SO WE CAN DISCUSS THAT
LATER IN
00:40:07.000 --> 00:40:11.000
THE PRESENTATION, BUT IT'S NOT A
00:40:11.000 --> 00:40:14.000
BLANKET APPROVAL THAT ANY PROJECT IN THE FUTURE SPECIFICALLY WOULD ONLY
APPLY TO
00:40:14.000 --> 00:40:20.000
THE 80 HOMES
00:40:20.000 --> 00:40:24.000
BEING DEVELOPED AT THE CANOPY. SO RALPH CAN TAKE IT FROM HERE. 00:40:24.000 --> 00:40:28.000
>> SURE, GREAT. WHY DON'T WE MOVE FORWARD TO SLIDE NUMBER SIX. SO FIRST
OF ALL,
00:40:28.000 --> 00:40:35.000
MY NAME IS RALPH
00:40:35.000 --> 00:40:38.000
HOLMES, I WORK FOR PIPER. ONE OF THE BOLD PROGRAMS. THE CALIFORNIA
MUNICIPAL
00:40:38.000 --> 00:40:43.000
FINANCE AUTHORITY IS
00:40:43.000 --> 00:40:46.000
A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, WHICH REPRESENTS CITIES, COUNTIES, SCHOOL
DISTRICTS,
00:40:46.000 --> 00:40:50.000
AND
00:40:50.000 --> 00:40:54.000
OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES IN CALIFORNIA. AND THE
00:40:54.000 --> 00:41:00.000
SOLE PURPOSE TO ISSUE BONDS, TO FORM COMMUNITY FACILITY 00:41:00.000 --> 00:41:06.000
DISTRICTS, TO SUPPORT SOCIAL PROGRAMS. HOWEVER, OTHER CITIES IN THE STATE ARE
00:41:06.000 --> 00:41:08.000
MEMBERS, AND SOME LOCAL CITIES INCLUDE WINDSOR, SANTA ROSA, NAPA. NEXT SLIDE,
00:41:08.000 --> 00:41:15.000
PLEASE? SO THE BOLD
00:41:15.000 --> 00:41:20.000
PROGRAM IS SOMETHING WE CREATED, WORK WITH CMFA
00:41:20.000 --> 00:41:26.000
TO ALLOW INFRASTRUCTURE, PUBLIC OWNED INFRASTRUCTURE BY CMFA 00:41:26.000 --> 00:41:33.000
ON BEHALF OF LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. ANY CMFA CAN PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM. IT
00:41:33.000 --> 00:41:36.000
WILL ALLOW TAX EXEMPT LOW COST FINANCING FOR THOSE PROJECTS.TO FACILITATE 00:41:36.000 --> 00:41:45.000
THE PROGRAM, WILL BE FORMED AND
00:41:45.000 --> 00:41:50.000
LATER BONDS WILL BE ISSUED. TYPICALLY WHEN WE POOL THEM, IN ORDER TO
ALLOW FOR
00:41:50.000 --> 00:41:53.000
LOW COST FINANCING FOR PROJECTS. THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, LATER ON, WE'LL
DISCUSS A
00:41:53.000 --> 00:41:59.000
LITTLE BIT ABOUT HOW
00:41:59.000 --> 00:42:05.000
MANY WE WOULD ISSUE. NEXT SLIDE. SO COMMUNITY FACILITIES IN THE DISTRICTS ARE
00:42:05.000 --> 00:42:09.000
FINANCING TOOL THAT ARE ALLOWED UNDER STATE LAW TO FUND PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.
00:42:09.000 --> 00:42:14.000
INCLUDED IN THAT INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDES GUTTERS,
00:42:14.000 --> 00:42:18.000
SIDEWALKS, OPEN SPACE, SCHOOL FACILITIES, AND IMPACT FEES. THE BOLD
PROGRAM WILL
00:42:18.000 --> 00:42:22.000
ALLOW FOR THE FUNDING OF THESE, AND ALSO CAN ALLOW
00:42:22.000 --> 00:42:28.000
FOR
00:42:28.000 --> 00:42:34.000
THE FUNDING OF SERVICES. NEXT SLIDE. SO IN ORDER TO JOIN THE PROGRAM, LOCAL
00:42:34.000 --> 00:42:41.000
AGENCY BECOMES A FEBRUARY. IT DOESN'T COST ANYTHING. THE LOCAL AGENCY
THAT THE
00:42:41.000 --> 00:42:45.000
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL TO HAVE A CONSULTANT PARTICIPATE, IT IF IT WISHES. AND THAT
00:42:45.000 --> 00:42:50.000
WOULD BE FUNDED
00:42:50.000 --> 00:42:53.000
AS A DEPOSIT. WE HAVE RESOLUTIONS IN FRONT OF YOU TO JOIN THE 00:42:53.000 --> 00:42:59.000
PROGRAM ON THE JOINT CMFA. JONES HALL IS OUR BOND COUNCIL, AND THEY'RE
THE FIRM
00:42:59.000 --> 00:43:04.000
THAT DOES LEGAL WORK ON BEHALF OF CMFA. IN TERMS OF FUNDING THE
IMPROVEMENTS AND
00:43:04.000 --> 00:43:12.000
THE APPLICATION AGREEMENT WILL BE DRAFTED, THAT WILL COVER 00:43:12.000 --> 00:43:15.000
THE FUNDING OF THOSE IMPROVEMENTS. AT THE TIME, THE BONDS ARE ISSUED WHEN 00:43:15.000 --> 00:43:19.000
PROCEEDS ARE AVAILABLE. LOCAL AGENCY
00:43:19.000 --> 00:43:24.000
WILL ACCEPT THE COMPLETED
00:43:24.000 --> 00:43:27.000
IMPROVEMENTS AND FEES. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE? SO
00:43:27.000 --> 00:43:32.000
WHY THE LOCAL AGENCIES? THE BIG
00:43:32.000 --> 00:43:39.000
REASON IS IT'S AN OUTSOURCING OF THE FORMATION BOND ISSUANCE PROCESS.
THERE IS
00:43:39.000 --> 00:43:45.000
NO COST TO THE PROGRAM. AND CMFA DOES EVERYTHING. ON THE HOMEOWNERS TAX BILL,
00:43:45.000 --> 00:43:50.000
THERE IS A LINE ITEM THAT IS CMFA, AND IT DOES NOT SAY THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL.
00:43:50.000 --> 00:43:56.000
THERE IS NO ONGOING ADMINISTRATION REQUIRED BY THE CITY. SIMPLY PUT, ALL YOU
00:43:56.000 --> 00:44:01.000
NEED TO DO IS ACCEPT TO JOIN THE PROGRAM, THAT YOU WOULD ACCEPT 00:44:01.000 --> 00:44:03.000
THE IMPROVEMENTS
00:44:03.000 --> 00:44:09.000
OR THE
00:44:09.000 --> 00:44:11.000
FEES. NEXT SLIDE. SO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. SO WITH SMALL PROJECTS, AND LARGE
00:44:11.000 --> 00:44:17.000
PROJECTS, BUT REDUCE PROJECTS
00:44:17.000 --> 00:44:22.000
AS SMALL AS $500,000. ANY DEVELOPER
00:44:22.000 --> 00:44:26.000
WILL NEED TO FORM THE DISTRICT. AND WHEN BONDS ARE ISSUED, THERE'S
CERTAIN
00:44:26.000 --> 00:44:31.000
CRITERIA THAT HAVE TO BE MET. ALL DISCRETIONARY IMPROVEMENTS HAVE TO BE
PLACED,
00:44:31.000 --> 00:44:35.000
A LIEN OF 4-1, AND THE PROJECT MUST MEET THE
00:44:35.000 --> 00:44:38.000
CITY'S
00:44:38.000 --> 00:44:54.000
GOALS AND POLICIES. NEXT SLIDE.
00:44:54.000 --> 00:44:58.000
GREAT. THE FORMATION PROCESS IS VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD. ONCE IT'S A MEMBER
OFBOLD, THE DEVELOPER WILL PROVIDE THE APPLICATION TO PARTICIPATE TO THE PROGRAM.
00:44:58.000 --> 00:45:03.000
WE WOULD REACH OUT TO CITY STAFF, AND WE WOULD CHECK IN TO MAKE SURE WHAT THE
00:45:03.000 --> 00:45:06.000
DEVELOPER WANTS TO DO IS OKAY WITH STAFF. ONCE THAT'S APPROVED OR THE
CITY STAFF
00:45:06.000 --> 00:45:11.000
SAYS YES, THEN WE GO FORWARD
00:45:11.000 --> 00:45:14.000
AND WORK ON THE FORMATION OF THE CMFA THAT WILL GO THROUGH THE LEGAL
PROCESS OF
00:45:14.000 --> 00:45:17.000
REFERRING THE CFD. IT
00:45:17.000 --> 00:45:22.000
TYPICALLY
00:45:22.000 --> 00:45:28.000
TAKES ABOUT THREE MONTHS. NEXT SLIDE. SO ONCE THEY'RE FORMED, NOW WE'RE IN A
00:45:28.000 --> 00:45:31.000
POSITION TO ISSUE BONDS ON THE PROJECT. IT'S A SEPARATE PROCESS, BUT, YOU KNOW,
00:45:31.000 --> 00:45:39.000
YOU HAVE TO FORM BEFORE YOU
00:45:39.000 --> 00:45:43.000
COULD ISSUE BONDS FOR THAT. AND TYPICALLY POOL FINANCING WILL NOTE THE LARGER
00:45:43.000 --> 00:45:47.000
FINANCING AGAIN TO SAVE MONEY, YOU KNOW, IN TERMS OF PROCESS. AND WE
WOULD LAY
00:45:47.000 --> 00:45:49.000
IT OUT HERE, THE PROCESS, BUT TYPICALLY IT WOULD TAKE ABOUT FOUR MONTHS.
WE
00:45:49.000 --> 00:45:56.000
WOULD
00:45:56.000 --> 00:46:03.000
SELL THE BONDS TO INVESTORS. NEXT SLIDE. SO WE STARTED
00:46:03.000 --> 00:46:09.000
THE PROGRAM IN 2018. SO FOR ABOUT 70 LOCAL AGENCIES HAVE JOINED THE
PROGRAM,
00:46:09.000 --> 00:46:13.000
REFORMED 110 CFDs, ISSUING ABOUT $675 MILLION IN BONDS FOR 70 DIFFERENT 00:46:13.000 --> 00:46:19.000
PROJECTS. AND THOSE PROJECTS WILL FUND THE IMPROVEMENTS 00:46:19.000 --> 00:46:21.000
FOR OVER 12,000 HOUSING UNITS. AND, YOU KNOW, CMFA IS ONE OF THEIR BIG
POLICIES
00:46:21.000 --> 00:46:28.000
TO HELP, YOU KNOW, INCREASE
00:46:28.000 --> 00:46:34.000
THE SUPPLY HOUSE WITHIN THE STATE. SO, YOU KNOW, IN 2026, WE'VE GOT TEN
SAFETIES
00:46:34.000 --> 00:46:40.000
AND THE FORMATION AS OF NOW. WE WILL PROBABLY FORM BETWEEN 20 AND 30
BEFORE THE
00:46:40.000 --> 00:46:44.000
YEAR IS DONE. WE'VE GOT SIX FINANCING SCHEDULES SO FAR. SO THINGS ARE MOVING
00:46:44.000 --> 00:46:49.000
RIGHT ALONG.LET ME GO AHEAD AND TURN IT BACK, I THINK IN 00:46:49.000 --> 00:46:54.000
TERMS
00:46:54.000 --> 00:46:59.000
OF THE CANOPY PROJECT. NEXT SLIDE. OH, I'M SORRY. I MISSED ONE. SO THIS IS A
00:46:59.000 --> 00:47:01.000
LISTING OF JURISDICTIONS THAT HAVE FORMED A PROGRAM. AGAIN, WE STARTED THIS
00:47:01.000 --> 00:47:06.000
PROGRAM IN 2018. IT REALLY
00:47:06.000 --> 00:47:11.000
DIDN'T GET GOING UNTIL 2020, BUT SINCE THEN, WE'VE PROBABLY 00:47:11.000 --> 00:47:14.000
ADDED FIVE TO EIGHT AGENCIES PER YEAR. AGAIN, WE'RE
00:47:14.000 --> 00:47:17.000
FORMING 25
00:47:17.000 --> 00:47:22.000
TO
00:47:22.000 --> 00:47:25.000
30 DISTRICTS IN HERE. NEXT SLIDE. I THINK I WILL TURN THIS BACK OR WOULD YOU
00:47:25.000 --> 00:47:28.000
LIKE ME TO TAKE THIS?
00:47:28.000 --> 00:47:32.000
>> I CAN TAKE IT, RALPH.
00:47:32.000 --> 00:47:37.000
>> CAN I INTERRUPT REAL QUICK. WE GENERALLY ALLOW TEN MINUTES FOR PRESENTATION.
00:47:37.000 --> 00:47:41.000
>> OKAY, WE'RE AT THE END. I APPRECIATE THAT, MADAM MAYOR. JUST ON A HIGH LEVEL
00:47:41.000 --> 00:47:45.000
WHAT THE BOLD PROGRAM WOULD ALLOW US TO DO WOULD PAY
00:47:45.000 --> 00:47:48.000
ALL OF OUR IMPACT FEES, WHICH ON THE SCREEN SHOWS ALL THE DIFFERENT
IMPACT FEES
00:47:48.000 --> 00:47:54.000
THE CITY OF
00:47:54.000 --> 00:47:59.000
SEBASTOPOL HAS. IT WOULD ALLOW US TO PAY THOSE IMPACT FEES, IF WE WERE
ACCEPTED
00:47:59.000 --> 00:48:05.000
AND APPROVED BY THE BOLD PROGRAM.I BELIEVE IT'S A LITTLE OVER $2.6
MILLION TO
00:48:05.000 --> 00:48:10.000
THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, RIGHT OFF THE BAT. AND INSTEAD OF WHAT THE
CURRENT
00:48:10.000 --> 00:48:14.000
PROCESS IS, WE ARE ALLOWING NEW STATE LAWS TO REFER OUR IMPACT FEES. SO AS WE
00:48:14.000 --> 00:48:19.000
BUILD EACH PROJECT, WE DON'T HAVE TO PAY THE IMPACT FEES 00:48:19.000 --> 00:48:23.000
UNTIL THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. SO AS A RESULT, IT WILL TAKE A YEAR OR TWO
00:48:23.000 --> 00:48:28.000
TO BUILD OUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT. ALL THE IMPACT FEES WOULD COME IN OVER TIME,
00:48:28.000 --> 00:48:33.000
OVER THE NEXT TWO TO THREE YEARS, WHERE THROUGH THE BOLD PROGRAM, WE WOULD
00:48:33.000 --> 00:48:39.000
ALLOW, WE WOULD BE ABLE TO PAY ALL THOSE IMPACT FEES THE CITY OF
SEBASTOPOL,
00:48:39.000 --> 00:48:44.000
RIGHT OFF THE BAT. AND THE FUTURE HOMEOWNERS OF THE CANOPY PROJECT WOULD SEE AN
00:48:44.000 --> 00:48:50.000
ASSESSMENT ON THEIR BILL OVER THE NEXT TAX BILL OVER THE NEXT 30 YEARS.
SO AT A
00:48:50.000 --> 00:48:53.000
VERY HIGH LEVEL, THAT'S WHAT THE BOLD PROGRAM IS AND WOULD ALLOW US TO DO.
00:48:53.000 --> 00:48:56.000
>> OKAY, THANK YOU.
00:48:56.000 --> 00:48:59.000
>> AND I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND RALPH IS ALSO AVAILABLE. 00:48:59.000 --> 00:49:01.000
>> YES, WE'RE GOING TO BRING IT BACK TO THE DAIS HERE. I SEE
COUNCILMEMBER
00:49:01.000 --> 00:49:04.000
ZOLLMAN HAS HIS HAND UP.
00:49:04.000 --> 00:49:07.000
>> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU FOR THE HIGH LEVEL BECAUSE THAT WAS A LOT,
00:49:07.000 --> 00:49:15.000
A LOT ON SLIDES I COULD NOT READ. BUT THE UPSHOT I GOT FROM THE STAFF
REPORT IS
00:49:15.000 --> 00:49:18.000
AGAIN WHAT YOU JUST SAID. IF WE APPROVE THIS, WE'LL GET ALL OF OUR MONEY SOON,
00:49:18.000 --> 00:49:24.000
LIKE YOU MENTIONED, $2 MILLION. IF WE APPROVE IT TONIGHT, THEN WHEN WILL WE GET
00:49:24.000 --> 00:49:29.000
THE CHECK FOR THE $2 MILLION? I JUST NEED TO BE FRANK WITH THAT THINLY
STAFFED
00:49:29.000 --> 00:49:32.000
CITY HERE. WE DO NOT, FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, NEED TO GET A MESH ON THINGS UNLESS
00:49:32.000 --> 00:49:36.000
THE PAYOFF IS QUICK.
00:49:36.000 --> 00:49:40.000
>> ABSOLUTELY. AND I DO WANT TO NOTE THE BOLD PROGRAM, THERE WOULD BE NO STAFF
00:49:40.000 --> 00:49:46.000
TIME. THERE WOULD BE VERY LIMITED STAFF TIME. WE WOULD OBVIOUSLY PAY FOR ALL
00:49:46.000 --> 00:49:49.000
THAT. BUT IF RALPH IS STILL AVAILABLE, I BELIEVE IT IS LATE SUMMER, BUT
HE WOULD
00:49:49.000 --> 00:49:52.000
BE ABLE TO BETTER SPEAK EXACTLY WHEN THAT WOULD OCCUR.
00:49:52.000 --> 00:49:57.000
>> SO WHAT DRIVES
00:49:57.000 --> 00:50:00.000
THE TIMING IS THE PROJECT ITSELF. MY UNDERSTANDING IS WE'RE THERE IN THE 00:50:00.000 --> 00:50:03.000
DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. WE ARE PROBABLY
00:50:03.000 --> 00:50:06.000
LOOKING LATE SUMMER
00:50:06.000 --> 00:50:11.000
TO EARLY FALL.
00:50:11.000 --> 00:50:16.000
>> OKAY. COUNCILMEMBER? OH, I'M SORRY. DID YOU HAVE YOUR HAND UP? 00:50:16.000 --> 00:50:21.000
>> YOU KNOW, IT IS ONLY A COUPLE OF YEARS
00:50:21.000 --> 00:50:26.000
UNTIL ALL OF THESE FINISH. DEAR SCOUTS, THIS IS WHY YOU GO TO SCHOOL, SO
YOU CAN
00:50:26.000 --> 00:50:31.000
DO SOME MATH HOMEWORK AND STUFF LIKE THAT. SO I DID SOME CALCULATIONS.
AND I TRY
00:50:31.000 --> 00:50:36.000
TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE HOMEOWNERS FOR THIS. SO WHAT
00:50:36.000 --> 00:50:42.000
YOU'RE DOING IS YOU'RE BASICALLY ASSIGNING A BOND TO THE HOMEOWNER, 00:50:42.000 --> 00:50:46.000
AND IT IS BEING ATTACHED TO THIS FOR THE NEXT 30 YEARS. THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO OPT
00:50:46.000 --> 00:50:52.000
OUT OF IT. THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO SELL OUT. YOU KNOW, YOU CAN PAY OFF YOUR
MORTGAGE
00:50:52.000 --> 00:50:59.000
EARLY, BUT YOU CAN'T PAY THIS OFF EARLY. THIS WILL ADD ANOTHER MAYBE $200 TO
00:50:59.000 --> 00:51:04.000
$300 ONTO EVERYBODY'S MORTGAGE, ABOUT $900,000. SO I CALCULATED. MAYBE YOU
00:51:04.000 --> 00:51:11.000
WOULD, AND TRUST ME, I LOVE CITY VENTURES AND I'M SO GLAD YOU BUILT HERE, LIKE I
00:51:11.000 --> 00:51:16.000
WANT TO SUPPORT YOU GUYS. BUT I THINK THIS WOULD ADD ABOUT $200,000 OR $300,000
00:51:16.000 --> 00:51:18.000
TO YOUR BENEFIT FOR THE PROJECT, WHICH ISN'T SUPER SIGNIFICANT. AND FOR
US, LIKE
00:51:18.000 --> 00:51:23.000
IT MAY
00:51:23.000 --> 00:51:29.000
NOT SAVE THAT MUCH MONEY. YOU KNOW, IF IT WERE LIKELY YOU WEREN'T GOING TO
00:51:29.000 --> 00:51:34.000
FINISH THESE, YOU KNOW, THAT WOULD BE A CONCERN. WE WOULD LIKE IT 00:51:34.000 --> 00:51:38.000
UPFRONT. THAT WOULD BE DIFFERENT. HOWEVER, YOU KNOW, IT APPEARS THAT THE 00:51:38.000 --> 00:51:43.000
HOMEOWNER MIGHT BE ON THE HOOK
00:51:43.000 --> 00:51:49.000
FOR LIKE $190,000 OVER THE TERM OF -- AND THAT'S 62 INDIVIDUALS THAT 00:51:49.000 --> 00:51:54.000
WOULD HAVE THIS AMOUNT ATTACHED TO THEIR MORTGAGE FOR THAT AMOUNT. SO 00:51:54.000 --> 00:52:00.000
THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT THE HOMEOWNERS ARE
OBLIGATED TO
00:52:00.000 --> 00:52:04.000
OVER THESE 30 YEARS AND THE BENEFIT TO YOU AND FOR THE CITY. SO I'M KIND OF
00:52:04.000 --> 00:52:09.000
CONCERNED ABOUT THAT AND WONDERING BECAUSE MAYBE WE SHOULD LEAVE THIS TO THE
00:52:09.000 --> 00:52:13.000
MARKET AND THEY COULD USE THEIR MORTGAGE FOR
00:52:13.000 --> 00:52:19.000
THAT SAVINGS OF $20,000, RATHER THAN THIS DEVICE TO
00:52:19.000 --> 00:52:25.000
SAVE SOME MONEY TO INCENTIVIZE SOME HOUSE BUILDING BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE THERE
00:52:25.000 --> 00:52:28.000
WOULD BE ABOUT $60,000 TO $90,000 OFF THE HOME PRICE GUARANTEED THAT YOU WOULD
00:52:28.000 --> 00:52:34.000
NEED. IT WOULD WORK
00:52:34.000 --> 00:52:38.000
OUT FOR THE HOME BUYER. AND BECAUSE HOUSING PRICES CAN VARY. THERE WAS NO 00:52:38.000 --> 00:52:41.000
GUARANTEE IN YOUR STATEMENT ABOUT EXACTLY HOW MUCH YOU WOULD 00:52:41.000 --> 00:52:46.000
REDUCE THE PRICE BY.
00:52:46.000 --> 00:52:50.000
>> SO WE PARTICIPATE IN THE BOLD PROGRAM THROUGHOUT THE STATE AND OTHER 00:52:50.000 --> 00:52:55.000
JURISDICTIONS THAT ARE ALREADY MEMBERS OF CMFA AND PARTICIPATE IN THE BOLD
00:52:55.000 --> 00:53:00.000
PROGRAM. JOINING THE BOLD PROGRAM ALLOWS US TO DO, NOT JUST, YOU KNOW, WE'VE
00:53:00.000 --> 00:53:07.000
DISCUSSED PAYING THE IMPACT FEES RIGHT AWAY. BUT WHAT IT ALSO ALLOWS US
TO DO IS
00:53:07.000 --> 00:53:15.000
REDUCE THE PRICES OF THE HOME OR BUY DOWN MORTGAGES FOR BUYERS, SO THEY COULD
00:53:15.000 --> 00:53:17.000
HAVE MORE BUYING POWER. SO IT IS NOT FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE. IT'S WIN, WIN.
FROM
00:53:17.000 --> 00:53:22.000
WHAT I UNDERSTAND, TWO THINGS,
00:53:22.000 --> 00:53:28.000
ONE, THE ASSESSMENT IS FULLY DISCLOSED THROUGH THE PROCESS. IF ANY FUTURE 00:53:28.000 --> 00:53:33.000
HOMEOWNER HERE WOULD BE FULLY AWARE OF THIS ANNUAL ASSESSMENT, BUT ALSO FROM
00:53:33.000 --> 00:53:37.000
WHAT I UNDERSTAND THROUGH, YOU KNOW, MARKETING AGENTS AND OTHER
COMMUNITIES
00:53:37.000 --> 00:53:42.000
THAT HAVE PARTICIPATED
00:53:42.000 --> 00:53:46.000
IN. THE BUYERS ARE -- I UNDERSTAND YOU'RE SORT OF LOOKING OUT FOR THOSE FUTURE
00:53:46.000 --> 00:53:50.000
HOMEOWNERS. BUT COUNTERINTUITIVELY ALMOST, I DON'T KNOW IF THAT IS THE 00:53:50.000 --> 00:53:54.000
RIGHT WORD, AND OTHER COMMUNITIES APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO
PARTICIPATE IN
00:53:54.000 --> 00:53:58.000
THIS PROGRAM BECAUSE IT REDUCES -- BECAUSE IT ALLOWS US TO NOT ONLY
REDUCE THE
00:53:58.000 --> 00:54:01.000
PRICE, BUT ALSO CREATE MORE INCENTIVES IN TERMS OF LIKE I SAID, BUYING
DOWN THE
00:54:01.000 --> 00:54:05.000
MORTGAGE.
00:54:05.000 --> 00:54:09.000
>> BUT THAT PRODUCTION ISN'T GUARANTEED. THERE IS NO QUANTITY THAT YOU'RE ABLE
00:54:09.000 --> 00:54:12.000
TO SAVE SPECIFICALLY, YOU KNOW? THAT IS THE POSSIBILITY FOR IT, BUT IS THAT
00:54:12.000 --> 00:54:15.000
POSSIBILITY GOING
00:54:15.000 --> 00:54:18.000
TO HAPPEN?
00:54:18.000 --> 00:54:23.000
>> OH, ABSOLUTELY. I MEAN, WE'VE ALREADY -- OBVIOUSLY IT DEPENDS ON HOW
TONIGHT
00:54:23.000 --> 00:54:28.000
GOES, BUT WE HAVE PLANNED TO -- WE NEED TO JOIN THE BOLD PROGRAM BEFORE WE
00:54:28.000 --> 00:54:34.000
CAN START ACTUALLY SELLING HOMES, AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE READY TO START
SELLING
00:54:34.000 --> 00:54:40.000
HOMES. BUT I MEAN, WE CAN START SELLING HOMES ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, BUT WE HAVE A
00:54:40.000 --> 00:54:46.000
MARKETING STRATEGY BASED ON IF WE WERE LUCKY ENOUGH TO BE ABLE TO 00:54:46.000 --> 00:54:50.000
JOIN THE BOLD PROGRAM THAT WOULD HAVE A WIDE VARIETY OF DIFFERENT
INCENTIVES FOR
00:54:50.000 --> 00:54:54.000
BUYERS, INCLUDING REDUCED HOME PRICES FROM WHAT WE WERE ORIGINALLY
PROJECTING,
00:54:54.000 --> 00:54:58.000
AND ALSO THE AVAILABILITY TO BUY DOWN MORTGAGE RATES BETWEEN 3% TO 4%,
WHICH IS
00:54:58.000 --> 00:55:03.000
CURRENTLY MUCH LOWER THAN WHAT THE MARKET
00:55:03.000 --> 00:55:08.000
IS. AND IT ALSO ALLOWS US TO BUILD OUT AND DEVELOP THE PROJECT FASTER.
FOR
00:55:08.000 --> 00:55:13.000
EXAMPLE, LIKE TO YOUR POINT EARLIER, IF WE LET THE MARKET DECIDE, THEN THE
00:55:13.000 --> 00:55:18.000
CURRENT MARKET, IN TERMS OF ABSORPTION AND HOW QUICKLY HOME SALES ARE
HAPPENING,
00:55:18.000 --> 00:55:22.000
THAT COULD TAKE POSSIBLY TWO, THREE, FOUR YEARS WITH THOSE ADDED INCENTIVES. WE
00:55:22.000 --> 00:55:27.000
ANTICIPATE THAT IT WOULD TAKE. IT WOULD
00:55:27.000 --> 00:55:30.000
BE A FASTER PROCESS.
00:55:30.000 --> 00:55:37.000
>> VICE MAYOR?
00:55:37.000 --> 00:55:40.000
>> SO I JUST WANT TO VERIFY. YOU SAID TO THE ATTORNEY, THERE IS NO COST, NO
00:55:40.000 --> 00:55:42.000
RISKS, AND NO LIABILITIES TO THE CITY?
00:55:42.000 --> 00:55:45.000
>> THAT'S RIGHT.
00:55:45.000 --> 00:55:48.000
>> THAT'S CORRECT.
00:55:48.000 --> 00:55:51.000
>> AND THE SECOND QUESTION IS ABOUT STAFF TIME. WE'RE SHORT STAFFED. HOW MUCH
00:55:51.000 --> 00:55:54.000
STAFF TIME WILL THIS REQUIRE?
00:55:54.000 --> 00:55:56.000
>> LESS THAN FIVE HOURS. VERY MINIMAL STAFFING.
00:55:56.000 --> 00:55:59.000
>> HOW MUCH
00:55:59.000 --> 00:56:06.000
OVER THE NEXT THREE MONTHS?
00:56:06.000 --> 00:56:11.000
>> CAN I SPEAK TO THAT? SO IN TERMS OF STAFF TIME, WE'LL HAVE, YOU KNOW,
SEVERAL
00:56:11.000 --> 00:56:15.000
CONFERENCE CALLS LESS THAN AN HOUR EACH. ALL THE STAFF TIME WILL BE
REIMBURSABLE
00:56:15.000 --> 00:56:18.000
FROM THE DEPOSIT THAT THE DEVELOPER WILL MAKE.
00:56:18.000 --> 00:56:22.000
>> OKAY.
00:56:22.000 --> 00:56:26.000
>> SO JUST A COUPLE MORE QUESTIONS. WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF 00:56:26.000 --> 00:56:29.000
THE CMFA PROGRAM FOLDED? WHAT HAPPENS THEN?
00:56:29.000 --> 00:56:33.000
>> THEN ANOTHER, YOU KNOW, ORGANIZATION
00:56:33.000 --> 00:56:38.000
WOULD HAVE TO TAKE IT OVER. I DON'T
00:56:38.000 --> 00:56:41.000
KNOW. IT'S A
00:56:41.000 --> 00:56:48.000
PUBLIC AGENCY.
00:56:48.000 --> 00:56:54.000
>> SO THE TAX WILL ALREADY BE ON THE ASSESSMENT RULES THEN? IT EXISTS AND 00:56:54.000 --> 00:56:59.000
PUBLIC AGENCIES CAN'T GO AWAY. SO THEY WOULD
00:56:59.000 --> 00:57:01.000
CONTINUE TO HAVE TO EXIST IN SOME FORM AND THE TAXES HAVE BEEN APPROVED ON THE
00:57:01.000 --> 00:57:04.000
PROPERTY TAX ROLE.
00:57:04.000 --> 00:57:07.000
>> BUT IT WON'T FALL BACK TO THE CITY?
00:57:07.000 --> 00:57:13.000
>> NO.
00:57:13.000 --> 00:57:17.000
>> OKAY. AND MY LAST QUESTION IS THEN SO DO BUYERS SAVE MONEY OR IS THIS MONEY
00:57:17.000 --> 00:57:20.000
THAT'S ADDED AS -- IS THERE INTEREST
00:57:20.000 --> 00:57:23.000
ON
00:57:23.000 --> 00:57:25.000
THIS MONEY THAT THEY OWE?
00:57:25.000 --> 00:57:31.000
>> DO YOU WANT TO TAKE THAT ROUTE?
00:57:31.000 --> 00:57:34.000
>> I COULD TAKE A RUN AT THAT. SOMETHING TO POINT OUT IS THAT BECAUSE OF YOUR
00:57:34.000 --> 00:57:40.000
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, WE COULD FUND THESE IMPROVEMENTS WITH TAX DOLLARS.
SO THE
00:57:40.000 --> 00:57:44.000
INTEREST RATE ON THEM ARE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THAN THEIR MORTGAGE RATE.
SO IF
00:57:44.000 --> 00:57:47.000
THEY'RE GOING TO PAY FOR THE HOUSE WITH, YOU KNOW, MORTGAGE RATES,
THEY'RE GOING
00:57:47.000 --> 00:57:53.000
TO BE FUNDING IT AT
00:57:53.000 --> 00:57:57.000
A 6% TO 6.5% RATE. FOR THE COMPONENT WE'RE FUNDING WITH THE BOLD
PROCEEDS, THE
00:57:57.000 --> 00:58:00.000
INTEREST RATE IS CONSIDERABLY LESS. IT IS MORE OF THE FIVE AND QUARTER RANGE.
00:58:00.000 --> 00:58:03.000
>> OKAY, THANK YOU.
00:58:03.000 --> 00:58:10.000
>> AND JUST TO BRIEFLY ADDRESS THAT. THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT THAT WOULD BE ON THE
00:58:10.000 --> 00:58:16.000
TAX BILL, THAT WOULD BE THE SAME AMOUNT FOR 30 YEARS. SO THAT WOULDN'T GO UP OR
00:58:16.000 --> 00:58:21.000
DOWN. IT WOULD BE THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT. IN TERMS OF THE MORTGAGE RATE THAT
00:58:21.000 --> 00:58:26.000
RALPH JUST EXPLAINED AGAIN. TO BE A PART OF THE PROGRAM WOULD ALLOW US TO HELP
00:58:26.000 --> 00:58:32.000
SOME FIRST TIME HOME BUYERS, YOUNG FAMILIES PAY DOWN THE MORTGAGES. SO
CURRENT
00:58:32.000 --> 00:58:37.000
MORTGAGE RATES ARE BETWEEN 6% TO 6.5%, BUT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO 00:58:37.000 --> 00:58:39.000
OFFER INCENTIVES THAT WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, BUY DOWN MORTGAGE RATES, SO
THEY'RE
00:58:39.000 --> 00:58:43.000
CLOSER BETWEEN 3% TO 4.5%.
00:58:43.000 --> 00:58:47.000
>> SO I'M JUST GOING TO ASK A QUICK QUESTION. JUST FOR CLARITY BECAUSE I HEAR
00:58:47.000 --> 00:58:51.000
ALL THESE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS, AND I'VE READ THIS, BUT YET I STILL FEEL LIKE
00:58:51.000 --> 00:58:55.000
THERE NEEDS TO BE CLARITY. IF WE HAD A $900,000 HOME, HOW DOES THIS IMPACT? I
00:58:55.000 --> 00:58:58.000
MEAN, I TRULY WANT TO HAVE SOME NUMBERS HERE. IF WE'RE SAYING SOMEONE WAS 00:58:58.000 --> 00:59:03.000
PURCHASING A HOME FOR $900,000, EXPLAIN TO
00:59:03.000 --> 00:59:07.000
ME WHAT THE BENEFITS ARE AND WHAT COST THIS IS TO THEM. I MEAN, JUST MAKE IT
00:59:07.000 --> 00:59:12.000
VERY SIMPLE FOR ALL OF US TO BETTER UNDERSTAND.
00:59:12.000 --> 00:59:15.000
>> VERY SIMPLE. I'LL SAY TWO THINGS. ONE, ON THAT $900,000 HOME, THERE'S
ROUGHLY
00:59:15.000 --> 00:59:21.000
ABOUT $45,000 OF IMPACT FEES, SO THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL WILL GET THAT
RIGHT AWAY
00:59:21.000 --> 00:59:25.000
INSTEAD OF THE NEXT FEW YEARS. AND THAT HOMEOWNER WOULD HAVE AN
ADDITIONAL
00:59:25.000 --> 00:59:28.000
ASSESSMENT ON THEIR TAX ROLL
00:59:28.000 --> 00:59:33.000
OF ROUGHLY $3,200 A YEAR. SO TWICE IN DECEMBER AND APRIL EVERY YEAR WHEN WE PAY
00:59:33.000 --> 00:59:36.000
OUR PROPERTY TAXES, THEY WOULD BE PAYING ABOUT $1,600 IN ADDITION. 00:59:36.000 --> 00:59:39.000
>> IN ADDITION?
00:59:39.000 --> 00:59:42.000
>> THAT WOULD BE FULLY DISCLOSED AND BEFORE THEY ACQUIRE, YOU KNOW,
PURCHASE THE
00:59:42.000 --> 00:59:44.000
HOME. THEY'D BE AWARE OF THAT.
00:59:44.000 --> 00:59:49.000
>> SO THAT WOULD BE A COST ON TOP OF WHATEVER ELSE?
00:59:49.000 --> 00:59:56.000
>> ON TOP OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX ALREADY, IF THERE ARE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT
00:59:56.000 --> 00:59:59.000
DISTRICTS FOR FIRE OR ANY OTHER SORT OF ASSESSMENT THE AREA HAS ON YOUR TAX
00:59:59.000 --> 01:00:02.000
BILL. >> OKAY.
01:00:02.000 --> 01:00:04.000
>> IT WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL.
01:00:04.000 --> 01:00:07.000
>> GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN.
01:00:07.000 --> 01:00:12.000
>> THANK YOU. FIRST, HOW DOES THAT HELP THE FAMILIES THEN? THAT DOESN'T SOUND
01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:15.000
LIKE THAT WOULD BE A WIN FOR A FAMILY, FROM WHAT I JUST HEARD. FIRST OF ALL, I
01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:19.000
WANT TO KNOW, IT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF OTHER
MUNICIPALITIES
01:00:19.000 --> 01:00:24.000
THAT ARE JUMPING ON THIS BANDWAGON. YOU RATTLED OFF A FEW IN THE BEGINNING. WHO
01:00:24.000 --> 01:00:29.000
LOCALLY HAS JUMPED ON THE BANDWAGON, AT LEAST WITHIN SONOMA COUNTY? SO TWO
01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:35.000
QUESTIONS. >> I'LL TAKE THE FIRST QUESTION, AND THEN I THINK RALPH CAN
ADDRESS
01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:40.000
THE SECOND QUESTION BECAUSE BOLD ALSO HAS A COW SIN, SKIP, WHICH I KNOW A LOT OF
01:00:40.000 --> 01:00:44.000
LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES PARTICIPATE.BUT IN TERMS OF HELPING THE FAMILIES. IF YOU'RE
01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:50.000
PAYING, YOU KNOW, IF YOUR
01:00:50.000 --> 01:00:54.000
MONTHLY MORTGAGE IS BASED ON A 4, 4.5% RATE VERSES A 6% RATE, SO 01:00:54.000 --> 01:01:00.000
THAT WOULD HELP THE FAMILY. AND SO, YOU KNOW, IN SOME WAYS FROM SOME OF THE
01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:05.000
CALCULATIONS WE'VE DONE, IT ACTUALLY WORKS OUT TO BE, IN TERMS OF YOUR
OVERALL
01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:12.000
ANNUAL HOUSING COST, LESS, INCLUDING THE TAX. OR YOU HAVE A LOWER
PROPERTY -- IF
01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:15.000
WE ARE NOT BUYING DOWN A MORTGAGE, WE ARE JUST OFFERING HOMES FOR A LOWER PRICE.
01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:19.000
THAT OBVIOUSLY REFLECTS BASED ON A
01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:22.000
LOWER PROPERTY TAX BASIS, WHICH OVER TIME ALSO HELPS THE HOMEOWNER. 01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:28.000
>> GO AHEAD, VICE MAYOR.
01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:31.000
>> SO HOW MUCH IS EACH PROPERTY GOING TO BE DEFERRING THEN? 01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:35.000
>> I'M SORRY?
01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:39.000
>> HOW MUCH WOULD EACH PROPERTY BE -- HOW MUCH IS GOING TO BE DEFERRED? WAS IT
01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:44.000
$30,000? IS THAT WHAT YOU SAID ON IMPACT FEES?
01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:49.000
>> OH, WELL, EACH PROPERTY, THE IMPACT FEES ARE BASED ON THE SQUARE
FOOTAGE, SO
01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:53.000
EACH, YOU KNOW, DEPENDING ON THE PLANNED TYPE, IT WOULD BE DIFFERENT. BUT IT'S
01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:58.000
ROUGHLY ABOUT, I WOULD SAY BETWEEN $30,000
01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:04.000
TO $40,000 OF IMPACT FEES. SO I WORK WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO PULL OUR
01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:10.000
BUILDING PERMITS AS WE GO BUILDING BY BUILDING. AND, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE THE
01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:14.000
ENTIRE, LIKE A BUILDING PERMIT FOR, YOU KNOW, YOUR AVERAGE UNIT IS
ROUGHLY
01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:21.000
BETWEEN $50,000 TO $60,000, BUT WE SEND IN A CHECK FOR $18,000. AND THEN, WE
01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:25.000
LIST OUT ALL THE IMPACT FEES THAT WE'RE DEFERRING. SO IT 01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:30.000
IS ROUGHLY ABOUT THAT AMOUNT. THEN IN TERMS OF THE OTHER MUNICIPALITIES, RALPH,
01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:38.000
I KNOW WE HAD A SLIDE ABOUT THAT. TO YOUR POINT, IT WAS HARD TO READ. IF YOU
01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:44.000
COULD GO OVER SOME OF THE OTHER MUNICIPALITIES THAT HAVE JOINED BOLD? 01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:48.000
>> SURE. TYPICALLY THIS PROGRAM IS UTILIZED WHERE IN COMMUNITIES THEY'RE 01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:52.000
BUILDING NEW HOMES. AND SO WHERE WE REALLY
01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:59.000
SEE IT IS THE VACAVILLE, FAIRFIELD. WE
01:02:59.000 --> 01:03:05.000
SEE IT IN PITTSBURG, SKIP IS IN BRENTWOOD, THE CONTINUED PROGRAM. WE'RE
ALL OVER
01:03:05.000 --> 01:03:08.000
THE CENTRAL VALLEY, WHERE A LOT OF HOMES ARE BEING
01:03:08.000 --> 01:03:11.000
CONSTRUCTED. PLACER
01:03:11.000 --> 01:03:17.000
COUNTY,
01:03:17.000 --> 01:03:21.000
ROSEVILLE, ROCKLAND, LINCOLN, RANCHO CORDOVA, THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, AND THEN
01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:26.000
WE'RE DOWN THE VALLEY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:29.000
AS WELL. AS I MENTIONED. 70 DIFFERENT HAVE JOINED THE PROGRAM. 01:03:29.000 --> 01:03:34.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER HINTON HAS A QUESTION.
01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:37.000
>> YES. SO JUST KIND OF STUDYING IT. IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU COULD LOWER THE
MORTGAGE
01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:47.000
BECAUSE OF THEIR TAX EXEMPT. THE
01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:50.000
DIFFERENCE ON A $900,000 LOAN BETWEEN 4% AND THE MARKET 6.5% ON A QUICK 01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:56.000
CALCULATION IS ABOUT $68,000
01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:00.000
A YEAR IN INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL. BUT YOU'RE SAYING THEN IT'S DISCLOSED THEIR
01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:05.000
PROPERTY TAXES GO UP $1,800 OVERALL. SO THAT SEEMS LIKE A HUGE COST
SAVINGS TO
01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:11.000
THE HOMEOWNER, JUST ON A QUICK MATH. IT WOULD BE GREAT IF YOU HAD SHOWED US THE
01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:14.000
MATH BECAUSE I THINK POINT OF ENTRY IS REALLY DIFFICULT WITH THE INTEREST RATES.
01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:19.000
>> ABSOLUTELY.
01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:22.000
>> FOR NEW HOME BUYERS, THAT'S THE DIFFICULT PART. THIS SYSTEM HELPS
BREAK THAT
01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:25.000
DOWN. THAT'S WHAT I'M HEARING?
01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:32.000
>> EXACTLY. BECAUSE YOUR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT, AGAIN, THESE ARE 01:04:32.000 --> 01:04:38.000
AVERAGES, WILL BE ROUGHLY $3,200. AND SO, YOU KNOW,
01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:44.000
IT'S ABOUT $250, $275 A MONTH ADDITIONAL TAX, BUT TO YOUR POINT, YOU
WOULD BE
01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:47.000
SAVING, DEPENDING WHETHER YOU'RE AT 6%, 6.5%, VERSES 4.5% MORTGAGE,
YOU'LL BE
01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:50.000
SAVING MORE. SO TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION, WHAT'S IN IT FOR THE BUYER? THAT'S
01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:53.000
WHAT'S IN IT FOR THE BUYER.
01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:56.000
>> OKAY, WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE
01:04:56.000 --> 01:05:00.000
HERE. I DON'T KNOW. GO AHEAD.
01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:05.000
>> JUST TO CLARIFY, YOU KEEP SAYING 4%, AND I'M KIND OF CURIOUS ABOUT THE 01:05:05.000 --> 01:05:15.000
LIKELIHOOD OF THAT OR HOW CAN WE BE SURE THAT THIS IS WHAT'S GOING TO BE PASSED
01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:18.000
ON TO THE BUYER OR IT COULD BE? THAT MIGHT BE A DIFFICULT THING TO SAY.
IT'S A
01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:23.000
SUPER GREAT MARKETING STORY. OVER TIME IF YOU CAN CUT THE INTEREST RATE.
THAT'S
01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:27.000
A GREAT THING TO DO. IF YOU CAN ONLY CUT THE PRICE BY MAYBE 01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:30.000
$20,000 OFF THE HOUSE, MAKE IT
01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:38.000
AN $880,000, INSTEAD OF $900,000,
01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:42.000
IT'S NEGLIGENTABLE. IF YOU GO DOWN TO FOUR, THAT'S WILDLY DIFFERENT, BUT I'M
01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:45.000
NOT REALLY SURE HOW YOU'D BE ABLE TO DO THAT OFF OF THIS AMOUNT, LIKE IT
DOESN'T
01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:48.000
SEEM TO WORK OUT.
01:05:48.000 --> 01:05:54.000
>> WELL, AT OUR CURRENT COMMUNITIES THAT ARE SELLING IN THE BAY AREA,
INCLUDING
01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:59.000
JUST UP THE ROAD IN SANTA ROSA. IF YOU GO TO OUR WEBSITE, WE OFFER THE
ABILITY
01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:03.000
TO, YOU KNOW, BUY DOWN YOUR MORTGAGE,
01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:09.000
LIKE ON OUR WEBSITE, PROMOTES 4 POINT SOMETHING PERCENT MORTGAGES. AGAIN, JUST
01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:12.000
THE CURRENT MARKET, WHICH WE'RE ALL AWARE OF. HOME BUILDERS AND
DEVELOPERS
01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:17.000
ARE OFFERING THOSE
01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:21.000
TYPES OF INCENTIVES BECAUSE ULTIMATELY FOR HOME BUYERS AND CITIES AND
DEVELOPERS
01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:25.000
TO SELL
01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:29.000
THESE HOMES THAN HAVE THEM SIT. IN THE
01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:33.000
WAY WE DEVELOPED TOWN HOMES, WE BUILT BUILDING BY BUILDING. WE DIDN'T START
01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:39.000
UNTIL THE NEXT PREVIOUS BUILDING WAS HALF SOLD AND THE
01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:43.000
BUILDING BEFORE THAT WAS FULLY SOLD. SO IF THEY'RE NOT
01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:46.000
MOVING IN THE CURRENT MARKET. IT'S GOING TO TAKE MUCH LONGER TO BUILD UP THE
01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:50.000
PROJECT. WHAT THIS WILL ALLOW
01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:55.000
US TO DO IS ULTIMATELY, YOU KNOW, IN OUR VIEW, AND I THINK THE VIEW OF THE
01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:58.000
BUYERS THAT WE'VE HEARD FROM THESE COMMUNITIES IS A BETTER PROPOSITION
FOR THEM
01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:04.000
AND FOR US AND FOR THE CITY. SO THAT'S
01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:06.000
WHEN I KEEP SAYING WIN, WIN, I TRULY BELIEVE THE PROGRAM REPRESENTS THAT. 01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:10.000
>> VICE MAYOR?
01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:13.000
>> SO CAN THESE FEES BE PAID OFF EARLY
01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:15.000
BY THE HOMEOWNER?
01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:18.000
>> YES.
01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:21.000
>> YEP.
01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:24.000
>> OKAY, GREAT, THANK YOU.
01:07:24.000 --> 01:07:27.000
>> AND A QUESTION I HAVE IS, YOU KNOW, THE QUESTION SAYS WILL THE SPECIAL TAX
01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:29.000
HURT FUTURE HOME BUYERS? HOW DOES THIS IMPACT FUTURE HOME SELLERS AT ALL, IF
01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:34.000
ANY? YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? TEN YEARS DOWN THE ROAD?
01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:38.000
>> SO AT TEN YEARS FROM DOWN THE ROAD, LET'S SAY SOMEBODY WHO BOUGHT THE HOUSE
01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:43.000
WHEN IT WAS BUILT SOLD THE HOUSE. THAT ANNUAL ASSESSMENT WILL CONTINUE
WITH THAT
01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:48.000
HOUSE UNTIL IT'S PAID OFF, UNTIL THE BOND IS PAID OFF UNTIL 30 YEARS.
AGAIN,
01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:52.000
THAT WOULD BE A PART OF THE SALES DISCLOSURE
01:07:52.000 --> 01:08:00.000
AND EVERYONE WOULD
01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:02.000
BE FULLY AWARE OF THAT. AFTER 30 YEARS, IT'S ALWAYS 30 BE 01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:05.000
YEARS, RIGHT, RALPH?
01:08:05.000 --> 01:08:08.000
>> YES.
01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:11.000
>> IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO SCHOOL BONDS OR HOSPITAL BONDS OR FIRE DISTRICTS, YOU
01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:13.000
KNOW? IT IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE TYPE OF BONDS. A LOT OF US ALREADY SEE ON OUR
01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:16.000
TAX ROLL AND THEY
01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:19.000
ARE GENERALLY 30
01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:22.000
YEARS.
01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:27.000
>> OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OH, GO AHEAD.
01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:31.000
>> I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THE BUYER WHO IS OBLIGATED TO THIS TAX 01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:38.000
AND THE TAX STAYS WITH THE HOUSE
01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:41.000
OR IT STAYS WITH THE MORTGAGE, AND THEY ARE ABLE TO PAY IT OFF EARLY, BUT IT'S
01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:46.000
THE FULL AMOUNT FOR PAYING IT OFF EARLY?
01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:49.000
>> YEAH. SO IT'S THE FULL AMOUNT FOR PAYING IT OFF EARLY. SO 01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:52.000
IT
01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:54.000
IS WITH THE HOUSE.
01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:57.000
>> I'M SORRY.
01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:00.000
>> YOU'RE ASKING IS THERE A BENEFIT TO PAYING IT
01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:03.000
OFF EARLY?
01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:07.000
>> I WOULD ARGUE NO.
01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:11.000
>> CAN HOMEOWNERS USE THIS AS A TAX WRITE OFF OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? I'M JUST
01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:14.000
CURIOUS. >> IT'S A GREAT QUESTION. RALPH, CAN HOMEOWNERS -- BECAUSE I
KNOW YOU
01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:19.000
CAN FOR SOME PROPERTY TAXES. CAN YOU USE THIS AS A TAX WRITE OFF? 01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:25.000
>> I BELIEVE THEY DO. I'M NOT A TAX ACCOUNTANT, BUT I BELIEVE HOMEOWNERS DO.
01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:28.000
>> TO THE EXTENT YOU CAN WRITE OFF YOUR PROPERTY TAXES, WHICH I KNOW
DEPENDING
01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:31.000
ON THE ADMINISTRATION EXISTS OR DOESN'T. THIS IS A PART OF YOUR OVERALL
PROPERTY
01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:34.000
TAX. AND SO TO
01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:37.000
THE EXTENT YOU CAN, ABSOLUTELY.
01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:41.000
>> SO I JUST HAVE ONE LAST QUESTION. IS THIS A PROGRAM YOU JUST NOW THOUGHT? I
01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:47.000
KNOW WE HAVE BEEN TALKING CANOPY FOR A WHILE, AND IT JUST COMES UP NOW.
WAS THIS
01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:50.000
ALREADY IN THE WORKS LIKE IN YOUR PLAN, YOU KNOW ALONG THE WAY OR HOW DID THIS
01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:53.000
COME TO FRUITION?
01:09:53.000 --> 01:10:00.000
>> THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. TO BE CANDID, NO, THIS WAS NEVER IN THE 01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:05.000
WORKS. WE NEVER CONSIDERED IT. SOME OF OUR, YOU KNOW, AS RALPH F
MENTIONED, WE
01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:10.000
DEVELOPED IN THE BAY AREA. I CONCENTRATE OBVIOUSLY ON SONOMA, NAPA, MARINE
01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:14.000
COUNTIES. AS RALPH MENTIONED, THERE IS NOT A LOT OF THAT MAJOR HOME
BUILDING
01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:17.000
DEVELOPMENT THAT YOU SEE IN THE CENTRAL VALLEY OR PARTS OF SACRAMENTO OR PARTS
01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:22.000
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, SO WE WERE UNAWARE
01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:26.000
OF IT. IN OUR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE, THEY HAVE A FEW DEVELOPMENTS DOWN
01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:31.000
THERE THAT ARE DEVELOPING IN AREAS WHERE THIS KIND OF PROGRAM EXISTS AND
ALL THE
01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:35.000
DEVELOPERS USE IT. THEY WERE TELLING US ABOUT IT. IT SORT OF REMINDED ME ABOUT
01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:39.000
CONVERSATIONS I HAD WITH STEVE AND TORY AND THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ABOUT HOW
01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:44.000
WE'RE ONLY PAYING 20% OF THE BUILDING PERMIT BECAUSE WE'RE DEFERRING SO
MANY OF
01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:51.000
THESE FEES. I LEARNED THERE WAS AN OPPORTUNITY HERE TO, 01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:55.000
AGAIN, PAY RIGHT OF IT ALL OFF. WE LEARNED ABOUT IT OVER THE LAST FEW
MONTHS,
01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:59.000
AND WE HAD A LOT OF GREAT CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF, MARY, ALEX, JANE, JOHN,
01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:04.000
AND WE STARTED TALKING TO THE CITY
01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:08.000
ABOUT HOW THIS COULD WORK HERE. AND SO NO, THIS WAS A RECENT -- WE
STARTED
01:11:08.000 --> 01:11:14.000
THINKING ABOUT IT, THEN WE STARTED THINKING ABOUT WAYS WE COULD, YOU
KNOW, IN
01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:17.000
THE CURRENT REAL ESTATE MARKET PROVIDE INCENTIVES AND LOWER THE PRICES FOR
01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:20.000
THE ABSORPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT. SO THIS CAME ABOUT IN THE LAST THREE
TO FOUR
01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:23.000
MONTHS.
01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:27.000
>> SO I HAVE ONE LAST QUESTION. SO DID I READ IT CORRECTLY? MAYBE I
MISSED IT
01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:29.000
WHERE IT SAID YOU COULDN'T START SELLING HOMES UNTIL WE FIGURE THIS OUT? SO YOU
01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:33.000
HAVEN'T SOLD ANY HOMES YET?
01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:38.000
>> WE'RE MARKETING THE HOMES, BUT WE
01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:43.000
CAN'T GO INTO CONTRACT UNTIL -- CORRECT ME IF I'M
01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:49.000
WRONG, RALPH, BUT I BELIEVE WE CAN'T GO INTO CONTRACT
01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:52.000
UNTIL YOU JOIN THE PROGRAM. IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT THE PROGRAM, THEN WE
WOULD GO
01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:54.000
INTO CONTRACT. >> RIGHT. BUT THE POINT IS WHETHER OR NOT YOU SOLD SOME OR NOT
01:11:54.000 --> 01:11:58.000
AND NOW YOU'RE DOING THIS?
01:11:58.000 --> 01:12:02.000
>> NO, NO, NO. WE HAVE ACTUALLY DELAYED FOR THAT VERY REASON. IF YOU CAN ASK
01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:07.000
MARY, WE GOT BEFORE THE COUNCIL AS QUICKLY AS WE WOULD. WE WANTED TOO
HAVE THIS
01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:12.000
IN JANUARY BECAUSE WE DO WANT TO START. WE HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE
INTERESTED,
01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:15.000
KNOCK ON WOOD. BUT YEAH, WE WOULD NEED TO KNOW ONE WAY OR ANOTHER BEFORE WE
01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:18.000
START SELLING.
01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:21.000
>> I SEE, OKAY. THAT'S ALL MY QUESTIONS. IF NO ONE ELSE HAS QUESTIONS, 01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:24.000
WE CAN GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:29.000
>> THANK YOU, MAYOR, SO THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE BOLD PROGRAM
FOR THE
01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:33.000
CANOPY PROJECT. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC HEARING, A PUBLIC
COMMENT,
01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:37.000
AGAIN, IT'S TWO MINUTES, TIME LIMIT. DOW CHAMBERS FIRST AND THEN GO OUT TO ZOOM.
01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:40.000
SO IF THERE IS ANYONE IN THE CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC
COMMENT
01:12:40.000 --> 01:12:43.000
ON THE BOLD PROGRAM FOR THE CANOPY PROJECT, PLEASE COME 01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:48.000
UP TO THE PODIUM.
01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:51.000
>> I'M GLAD TO BE HERE FOR
01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:55.000
THE PRESENTATION. LAWRENCE JAFFEY, LOCAL RESIDENT, LOCAL RENTAL PROVIDER.
THERE
01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:58.000
ARE THREE PLACES WHERE I THINK THIS PROGRAM, AND I REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR 01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:01.000
QUESTIONS, IMPACT THE POTENTIAL BUYER OF THIS PROPERTY. THE FIRST, OUR 01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:04.000
DEVELOPERS ARE ASSUMING EVERYONE IS
01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:08.000
GOING TO GET A MORTGAGE. SO NOT EVERYONE OF THE 80 PEOPLE ARE GOING TO
BUY WITH
01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:14.000
A MORTGAGE. PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SELL THEIR HOUSES AND BUY HERE FOR CASH.
THOSE
01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:19.000
PEOPLE WILL NOW BE LOCKED IN TO PAY $2 FOR EVERY $1 OF ASSESSMENT IMPACT FEE
01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:26.000
BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY 30 YEARS. SO FOR EVERY DOLLAR THEY
BORROW,
01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:29.000
THEY'RE GOING TO PAY $2 BACK. THERE IS ONLY APPARENTLY A FEE FROM PIPER TO DO
01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:34.000
THIS. I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH THE FEE IS, BUT WE KNOW THAT'S ADDED ON TO WHAT
01:13:34.000 --> 01:13:38.000
THESE FOLKS ARE GOING TO PAY ON THEIR TAXES. WHEN WILL IT AFFECT THE NEXT PEOPLE
01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:42.000
WHEN THEY GO TO SELL THEIR HOUSE? BECAUSE PEOPLE BUY THE HOUSE BY WHAT
THEY CAN
01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:46.000
AFFORD TO PAY. NOW THEIR TAXES ARE HIGHER. SO YOU LOOK AT THE TAXES AND
WHATEVER
01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:52.000
THE INTEREST RATES ARE AT THE DATE OF PURCHASE. THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO BRING
01:13:52.000 --> 01:13:59.000
THE PRICE HOUSE WITHIN REACH OF WHAT PEOPLE CAN PAY. NOW THEY HAVE THIS HIGHER
01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:05.000
TAX ASSESSMENT. FOLKS WOULD BE INCENTIVIZED TO PAY THIS OFF. ALSO, THERE ARE
01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:08.000
ONLY VERY LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE THIS IS DEDUCTIBLE. REMEMBER, WE
HAVE OUR
01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:14.000
SALT LIMITATIONS. THIS IS NOT NECESSARILY DEDUCTIBLE FOR OUR HOMEOWNERS.
YOU
01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:18.000
HAVE TO BE PRETTY LOW INCOME TO GET THIS DEDUCTION. I UNDERSTAND THE CITY MAY
01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:24.000
WISH TO RECEIVE AND FIND GREAT BENEFIT OF RECEIVING THE FULL IMPACT FEE, AND
01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:29.000
THAT'S WHY YOU'RE GIVING A DEEP CONSIDERATION. ALSO, I THINK THIS IS A GREAT
01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:36.000
BENEFIT FOR OUR DEVELOPER, WHO IS SHIFTING THE RISK OF
01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:39.000
THESE DOLLARS ONTO FUTURE HOMEOWNERS. AS WE'VE ABSORBED THE LAST 18
MONTHS,
01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:41.000
HOUSING PRICES HAVE DROPPED.ACTUAL COUNTY IS DROPPING.
01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:44.000
>> LAWRENCE, YOU HAVE ABOUT 15 SECONDS.
01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:47.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR DEEP CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUE.
01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:50.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM. JUNE, 01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:56.000
CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE?
01:14:56.000 --> 01:15:02.000
>> YES, HI, GOOD EVENING. YEAH, THIS IS JUNE. AND YEAH, I HAVE SOME OF
THE SAME
01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:07.000
CONCERNS THAT LAWRENCE AND PHILL HAVE RAISED JUST ABOUT THE HOUSING
BURDEN ON
01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:11.000
ONGOING COSTS, YOU KNOW. OTHER PLACES MAY HAVE OPTED IN. FOLKS LIKE A
LOWER COST
01:15:11.000 --> 01:15:18.000
NOW, BUT THEN THERE'S A BURDEN OVER TIME. IT IS GOING TO SHOW UP ON THE
PROPERTY
01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:21.000
TAX. YOU KNOW, PEOPLE START SEEING THEIR PROPERTY TAXES GOING UP, AND
THEN THEY
01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:24.000
HAVE
01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:28.000
A
01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:32.000
LESS APPETITE FOR OUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. IT WOULD BE GREAT IF FOLKS, WHEN THEY
01:15:32.000 --> 01:15:38.000
WERE BUYING THE HOUSE, COULD OPT IN OR OPT OUT. SO IF THEY HAD THAT $40,000 AND
01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:43.000
THEY JUST WANTED TO PAY IT. BUT WITH THIS, IF A WEEK AFTER THEY BUY THE HOUSE
01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:49.000
THEY SAY THEY WANT TO PAY OFF THE BOND, THEY NEED TO PAY THE WHOLE
AMOUNT, WHICH
01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:56.000
IS DOUBLE THE COST. I WISH WE COULD GET IN WRITING F IT GOES FORWARD,
THAT IT
01:15:56.000 --> 01:16:00.000
WON'T BE AN INTEREST RATE ABOVE 4%. WE'RE HEARING 3% TO 01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:05.000
4%, THEN WE HEAR 3.25. COULD IT BE 6%? WHAT GUARANTEE DO WE HAVE ON WHAT THE
01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:08.000
INTEREST WILL BE ON THE BOND? I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT IN WRITING BEFORE GOING
01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:13.000
FORWARD. IT WOULD ALSO BE NICE TO
01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:16.000
SEE SOME GUARANTEE THAT THE HOMEOWNERS WILL, SURE, IT
01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:20.000
WOULD BE DISCLOSED
01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:25.000
TO THEM, BUT HOW PROMINENT BE? YOU'LL GET IT THIS AMOUNT OVER THE YEAR
WHEN YOU
01:16:25.000 --> 01:16:30.000
RESELL YOUR HOUSE IF YOU TRY TO PAY IT OFF, YOU'LL PAY X AMOUNT TO PAY
OFF THIS
01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:37.000
BOND. BECAUSE THE MIN YOU BUY, YOU'RE LOCKED
01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:42.000
IN FOR THAT GREATER AMOUNT. SO IT DOES PUT THE BURDEN ON THE COUNTY 01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:46.000
TO COLLECT THE PROPERTY TAX. WE HAVE A LOT OF SHARED GOALS WITH THE
COUNTY, AND
01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:50.000
HOW WE
01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:54.000
FUND OUR PUBLIC SERVICES. SO I DO THINK IT'S
01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:57.000
THE CASE OF THOSE FINANCIERS, COLLECTING THEIR LOAN
01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:00.000
MONEY OVER ALL THE YEARS. YOU KNOW, ECONOMY HAS CHANGED AND THE BURDENS
ARE OUT
01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:02.000
TO THE FUTURE.
01:17:02.000 --> 01:17:05.000
>> JANE, THAT'S TWO MINUTES.
01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:09.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS. IF ANYONE
01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:12.000
WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT ON THIS PUBLIC HEARING? SEEING NONE, I'LL GO BACK
01:17:12.000 --> 01:17:15.000
OUT TO ZOOM. KATE, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE?
01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:17.000
>> THANK YOU.
01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:20.000
>> THANK YOU. CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER STILL?
01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:23.000
>> I CAN.
01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:26.000
>> GREAT, GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:32.000
>> I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT NUMBER ONE, IF THE CONSUMERS CAN DECIDE ON
THEIR OWN
01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:38.000
IF THEY WANT TO TAKE ON IT HAD COST OR NOT. CLEARLY THE DEVELOPERS 01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:43.000
ARE PROBABLY MUCH MORE EXPERIENCED WITH PRICING HOMES AND DEVELOPING THEM AND
01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:49.000
SELLING THEM THAN MOST OF US PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE. IF THEY FEEL LIKE
CONSUMERS
01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:55.000
WANT TO TAKE ON THIS EXTRA EXPENSE, WHICH WOULD ALWAYS BE DISCLOSED TO THEM
01:17:55.000 --> 01:17:58.000
BECAUSE THAT'S HOW MORTGAGES AND PRICING WORK. THEN I THINK THAT IT SEEMS LIKE
01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:02.000
WE WOULD LIVE IN
01:18:02.000 --> 01:18:10.000
A MARKETED ECONOMY FOR NOW. THE MARKET WORKS IN A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS.
THIS
01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:14.000
SEEMS TO BE A STRATEGY THAT'S WORKING. THE OTHER POINT I WANT TO SAY IS THAT
01:18:14.000 --> 01:18:17.000
INFLATION IS ALSO A CONSTANT IN OUR ECONOMY. SO IF WE DELAY GETTING THE
MONEY TO
01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:22.000
THE CITY
01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:26.000
FOR THE IMPACT FEES, THE PRICES TO DO THE WORK THAT THE MONEY 01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:31.000
OF THE
01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:36.000
IMPACT FEES IS SUPPOSE TO COMPLETE WILL ALSO GO UP. ALL THE IMPACT FEES 01:18:36.000 --> 01:18:38.000
THEMSELVES WILL REMAIN THE SAME. SO YOU ARE BASICALLY, IF YOU COLLECT THE SAME
01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:44.000
AMOUNT OF MONEY FIVE YEARS
01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:51.000
FROM NOW, IT WON'T BUY AS MUCH IN MARKET FIVE YEARS FROM NOW. AND LIKE
MORTGAGES
01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:54.000
THAT ARE 30 YEARS OLD, THIS BOND AMOUNT WILL SEEM MUCH SMALLER 01:18:54.000 --> 01:18:59.000
IN 10, 15,
01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:02.000
20 YEARS BECAUSE AS INFLATION INCREASES OVER TIME, PRICES THAT ARE LOCKED IN A
01:19:02.000 --> 01:19:05.000
DIFFERENT MOMENT SEEM MUCH CHEAPER, WHICH IS
01:19:05.000 --> 01:19:11.000
WHY PEOPLE
01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:15.000
WHO BOUGHT THEIR HOUSES, ONLY PAY $600,000 A YEAR ON PROPERTY TAXES 01:19:15.000 --> 01:19:21.000
HAVE EXTREMELY LOW PROPERTY TAXES. SO GIVEN THE FACT WE HAVE INFLATION ON ONE
01:19:21.000 --> 01:19:23.000
SIDE AND A MARKET ON THE OTHER, I THINK THIS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN A GOOD
01:19:23.000 --> 01:19:26.000
LIGHT BY THE COUNCIL. THANK YOU.
01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:31.000
>> THANK YOU, KATE FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS.
01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:35.000
IF THERE IS ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE
01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:40.000
BOLD PROGRAM? SEEING N I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. IF THERE IS ANYONE ON
ZOOM THAT
01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:45.000
WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THIS BOLD PROGRAM. PLEASE 01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:48.000
RAISE YOUR HAND VIRTUALLY. SEEING NONE, THE PUBLIC
01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:51.000
HEARING IS CLOSED.
01:19:51.000 --> 01:19:55.000
>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. GO AHEAD, VICE MAYOR?
01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:58.000
>> SO I HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. WILL THE PROGRAM, WILL THE BOLD
PROGRAM BE
01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:03.000
OPTIONAL FOR HOME BUYERS
01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:06.000
OR IS IT REQUIRED?
01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:11.000
>> IT
01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:16.000
WOULD NOT BE OPTIONAL. FOR THE 68 -- THE
01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:23.000
MARKET BASED HOMES, THE INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOMES DO NOT PARTICIPATE.
BUT
01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:27.000
FOR THE 68 MARKET RATE HOMES, IF WE WERE GRANTED THE ABILITY TO APPLY TO THE
01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:30.000
BOLD PROGRAM, IT WOULD APPLY TO ALL 68 HOMES.
01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:32.000
>> OKAY. WILL THERE BE CLEAR DISCLOSURES?
01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:35.000
>> ABSOLUTELY.
01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:39.000
>> CAN THE INTEREST RATE BE SECURE? HOW CAN WE BE SURE THAT INTEREST RATE IS
01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:44.000
STABLE? >> NOW, I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY BECAUSE I KNOW A PUBLIC COMMENTER
BROUGHT
01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:47.000
THAT UP. ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THE INTEREST RATE ON THE BOND OR THE
INTEREST RATE
01:20:47.000 --> 01:20:50.000
FOR THE HOMEOWNER?
01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:52.000
>> THE RATE THE HOMEOWNER
01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:55.000
WILL BE PAYING?
01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:59.000
>> SO THE BOND, AND RALPH CAN EXPLAIN MORE ABOUT THIS. BUT THE BOND
INTEREST
01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:06.000
RATE, I BELIEVE IS STABLE OVER 30 YEARS. I'M NOT SURE. RALPH? 01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:10.000
>> IT IS. SO THE BOND RATE IS SET AT THE TIME OF PRICING, AND IT'S FIXED
AT THAT
01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:13.000
POINT. IT'S NOT FIXED UNTIL BONDS ARE SOLD, BUT THEY'RE IN THE CURRENT
MARKET,
01:21:13.000 --> 01:21:17.000
WHERE YOU ARE LOOKING AT LOW 5s.
01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:23.000
>> AND THEN THE MORTGAGE RATE, LIKE IF WE WERE, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, I
THOUGHT ONE
01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:28.000
OF THE PUBLIC COMMENTERS BROUGHT UP A GOOD POINT. IN NO WAY WOULD A
DEVELOPER BE
01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:33.000
PROPOSING THIS PROGRAM THAT WOULD JUST RAISE THE PRICES ON POTENTIAL
HOMEOWNERS
01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:38.000
EVEN MORE THAN THE EXISTING HOME PRICE WITHOUT MAKING ANY CHANGES,
ESPECIALLY IN
01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:42.000
THIS MARKET. MEANING THE INCENTIVES TO BUY DOWN MORTGAGES, THE ACTUAL
REALITY OF
01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:48.000
LOWERING HOME PRICES ARE A PART OF THE WHOLE PROGRAM BECAUSE NO HOME BUYER
01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:50.000
WOULD, I THINK YOU UNDERSTAND MY POINT ON THAT. SO IN TERMS OF YOUR
QUESTION
01:21:50.000 --> 01:21:53.000
ABOUT THE MORTGAGE RATE, THAT WOULD --
01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:56.000
>> THE INTEREST RATE ON THE BOLD FEE.
01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:02.000
>> THE INTEREST RATE ON THE BOLD FEE?
01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:05.000
>> THE IMPACT FEE. THAT'S THE ADDITIONAL TAX ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILL. IS THAT
01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:08.000
GOING TO BE
01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:14.000
STABLE?
01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:17.000
>> YES. THE BOLD, YES, THE BOND, YES, AS RALPH JUST DESCRIBED, THAT WOULD BE
01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:21.000
SOLID. >> GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER HINTON?
01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:25.000
>> SO JUST HAVING LISTENED TO THIS. I KNOW IT'S REALLY DIFFICULT TO SELL HOMES
01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:29.000
RIGHT NOW AND BUILD THEM. I HAVE A GOOD FRIEND, MY BEST FRIEND ACTUALLY WHO
01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:33.000
WORKS. AND THINGS ARE SLOWING DOWN. SO IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU GUYS ARE
PROPOSING
01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:36.000
THIS TO US BECAUSE YOU THINK THIS IS GOING TO HELP YOU SELL THESE HOMES? 01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:40.000
>> YES.
01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:44.000
>> AND THERE IS NO DOWNSIDE TO THE CITY. AND I'M NOT AN 01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:49.000
EXPERT IN THIS AREA, BUT I DO BELIEVE
01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:54.000
PEOPLE BUYING HOMES HAVE TO
01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:57.000
UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY'RE COMMITTING TO. I FEEL
01:22:57.000 --> 01:23:00.000
LIKE OUR STAFF IS COMFORTABLE, THEN I WOULD SUPPORT -- I DON'T THINK YOU'RE
01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:03.000
GOING TO PUTT ANYTHING IN TO HELP YOU NOT SELL HOMES.
01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:06.000
>> EXACTLY, YES.
01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:09.000
>> ANY WAY, I JUST WANT TODAY ADD THAT COMMENT.
01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:11.000
>> THANK YOU.
01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:15.000
>> SO ACTUALLY BECAUSE OF SOME PUBLIC COMMENTS. SO IF SOMEONE COMES IN
AND PAYS
01:23:15.000 --> 01:23:18.000
CASH, THEN THEY'RE JUST GOING TO -- THEY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO JUST PAY THIS
01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:22.000
OFF. BUT I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY --
01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:25.000
>> IN THAT CASE, THEY PROBABLY WOULD PAY CASH FOR A LOWER PRICED HOME. WE CAN'T
01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:31.000
OFFER A MORTGAGE INCENTIVE. THE HOME PRICE
01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:34.000
WOULD BE
01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:37.000
LOWER.
01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:39.000
>> OKAY. GO AHEAD.
01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:42.000
>> I THINK YOU HAVE AN EXCELLENT PRODUCT. I'M EXCITED ABOUT THEM. I THINK 01:23:42.000 --> 01:23:45.000
THEY'RE GORGEOUS, AND I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO SELL. BUT I DON'T THINK
THAT'S A
01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:50.000
REASON FOR YOU TO NEED THIS
01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:55.000
TOOL. AND I THINK IT
01:23:55.000 --> 01:23:59.000
IS COME COME FOR A LOT OF PEOPLE INVOLVED. AGAIN, I SUPPORT THE
DEVELOPMENT A
01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:03.000
LOT. BECAUSE LIKE THERE IS NO GUARANTEE ON LIKE HOW MUCH YOU'LL REDUCE IT 01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:08.000
BECAUSE THIS IS A FLUCTUATING THING THAT HAPPENS MONTHLY, 01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:13.000
YOU KNOW, LIKE THINGS CHANGE. SO YEAH. I REALLY WANT YOU GUYS TO DO
GREAT, BUT I
01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:16.000
DON'T THINK THIS IS THE RIGHT WAY TO HELP HERE.
01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:18.000
>> THANK
01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:21.000
YOU.
01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:24.000
>> ANYONE ELSE? ANY COMMENTS? OKAY. SO DO
01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:27.000
WE HAVE A MOTION OR OTHER THOUGHTS?
01:24:27.000 --> 01:24:32.000
>> I'LL GO AHEAD AND
01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:34.000
MAKE THE MOTION, I GUESS. I WOULD MOVE THAT
01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:39.000
-- WOULD IT BE WE WOULD
01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:43.000
-- I WOULD MOVE THAT WE SUPPORT
01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:48.000
THE RESOLUTION JOINING THE CMFA AND A RESOLUTION APPROVING AUTHORIZING 01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:53.000
PARTICIPATION IN THE BOLD PROGRAM FOR THE CANOPY HOUSING PROJECT. ALL
COSTS TO
01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:56.000
THE CITY CAN BE REIMBURSED THROUGH THE BOLD PROGRAM. IS THAT WHAT I NEED 01:24:56.000 --> 01:24:58.000
TO SAY?
01:24:58.000 --> 01:25:01.000
>> I'LL SECOND THAT. ALL RIGHT, MARY?
01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:06.000
>> THANK YOU, SO MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER HINTON AND SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR MAURER
01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:11.000
TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE RESOLUTION JOINING THE CMFA AND APPROVE AND
ADOPT A
01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:13.000
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE BOLD SOLELY FOR THE CITY VENTURES, THE CANOPY 01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:16.000
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. COUNCILMEMBER CARTER?
01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:19.000
>> NO.
01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:22.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER HINTON?
01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:24.000
>> YES.
01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:27.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN?
01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:30.000
>> YES.
01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:33.000
>> VICE MAYOR MAURER?
01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:35.000
>> YES.
01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:38.000
>> MAYOR MCLEWIS?
01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:41.000
>> YES.
01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:44.000
>> MOTION PASSES 4-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBERS HINTON, ZOLLMAN, VICE MAYOR
MAURER, AND
01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:47.000
MAYOR MCLEWIS IN SUPPORT, AND COUNCILMEMBER CARTER IN OPPOSITION. 01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:49.000
>> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT, SO WE WILL MOVE ON TO,
01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:52.000
LET'S SEE, ITEM NUMBER 7. THAT IS THE SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE, PUBLIC
HEARING TO
01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:55.000
CONSIDER FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER
8.80 OF
01:25:55.000 --> 01:25:57.000
THE CITY'S SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNITY
01:25:57.000 --> 01:26:02.000
SAFETY ORDINANCE. AND I DON'T KNOW.
01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:05.000
>> I'LL BE PRESENTING THAT, MAYOR. GETTING SCREEN SHARING PRIVILEGES. 01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:08.000
>> MAYBE
01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:17.000
WE'LL
01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:24.000
GIVE THEM A MINUTE. THANK YOU. HOW ABOUT WE -- CAN WE TAKE A BIO 01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:27.000
BREAK FOR FIVE MINUTES? [ MEETING WILL RESUME
01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:57.000
AFTER A FIVE-MINUTE BREAK ]
01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:35.000
>>> ALL
01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:38.000
RIGHT, WE'RE BACK. ALL RIGHT. SO WE ARE GOING TO PICK UP WITH NUMBER SEVEN,
01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:43.000
SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE. I THINK OUR CITY ATTORNEY IS GOING TO KICK THAT OFF.
01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:50.000
>> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, ONCE AGAIN, AND COUNCILMEMBERS. TONIGHT, BEFORE
YOU AS A
01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:54.000
PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8.80, THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE, 01:28:54.000 --> 01:29:00.000
THE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNITY ORDINANCE. SO THE COUNCIL FIRST 01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:04.000
APPROVED THIS ORDINANCE BACK IN 2022. IF YOU LOOK AT THE FINDINGS AND THE 01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:09.000
PURPOSE THAT'S STATED THERE, THERE'S A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT BIOMETRIC
CAMERAS
01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:13.000
AND SORT OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES. BUT IT'S MUCH BROADER THAN 01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:16.000
THAT AND THE ACTUAL
01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:19.000
DEFINITIONS. SO IT
01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:24.000
DEFINES SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, ANY
01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:28.000
SOFTWARE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR SIMILAR. PRIMARILY INTENDED TO COLLECT,
PERTAIN,
01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:34.000
SHARE AUDIO, ELECTRONIC, VISUAL,
01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:40.000
BIOMETRIC. ALL THE FACTORY, SIMILAR INFORMATION, SPECIFICALLY ASSOCIATED 01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:46.000
WITH ANY INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP. SO VERY BROAD TALKING ABOUT 01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:52.000
SOME SORT OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, BUT ALSO VERY SIMPLE TECHNOLOGIES 01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:58.000
LIKE VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDING. THE DEFINITION PROVIDES 01:29:58.000 --> 01:30:01.000
EXAMPLES. THIS IS A NON-EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF LICENSE PLATE READERS, TOLL
READERS,
01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:04.000
GUNSHOT DETECTION, HARDWARE
01:30:04.000 --> 01:30:11.000
AND SOFTWARE MOBILE DNA CAPTURE. CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CAMERA IS 01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:14.000
ONE OF THE ITEMS ON THE LIST. THE OTHER EXAMPLES, YOU KNOW, X-RAY VANS,
SOFTWARE
01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:20.000
DESIGN
01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:25.000
AND MONITOR SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES. RADIO FREQUENCY I.D. SCANNERS. SO AGAIN,
01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:28.000
YOU'RE SEEING THE DEFINITION IS, YOU KNOW, HAS A LOT OF EXAMPLES OF VERY 01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:33.000
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, BUT ALSO THE
01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:39.000
CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CAMERAS. SO CURRENTLY WHAT THE ORDINANCE
REQUIRES
01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:43.000
IS THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE BIOORDINANCE AS SURVEILLANCE USE POLICY EACH TIME
01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:47.000
BEFORE THE CITY CAN SEEK FUNDS
01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:52.000
OR ACCEPT DONATIONS FOR SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. ACQUIRE 01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:55.000
OR BORROW NEW SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. USE NEW SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY.
USE
01:30:55.000 --> 01:31:00.000
EXISTING SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY FOR A PURPOSE IN A MANNER OR IN A
LOCATION, NOT
01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:05.000
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OR BEFORE
01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:11.000
THE CITY, AN AGREEMENT INCLUDING ORAL AGREEMENT WITH
01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:16.000
A NON-CITY ENTITY TO ACQUIRE SHARE OR OTHERWISE USE TECHNOLOGY. THAT'S ANY OF
01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:20.000
THE TYPES OF SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY THAT WILL
01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:26.000
FALL UNDER THAT DEFINITION. SO THE BROAD NATURE
01:31:26.000 --> 01:31:30.000
OF THE ORDINANCE HAS CREATED SOME IMPACTS RECENTLY. ONE OF THEM BEING THE CITY
01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:33.000
CAN'T UPGRADE SOME OF THEIR OLDER TECHNOLOGY WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THAT 01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:39.000
SPECIFIED PROCESS
01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:45.000
IN THE ORDINANCE, WHICH INVOLVES A REPORT ON CONSENT AND 01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:49.000
THEN, YOU KNOW, 45 DAYS LATER, A PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE ORDINANCE. BUT 01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:52.000
BEFORE IT UPGRADES THE TECHNOLOGY. SO THIS HAS COME UP WITH THE POLICE 01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:58.000
DEPARTMENT, WHERE THEY HAVE
01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:02.000
SECURITY CAMERAS AT SOME FACILITIES AROUND THE CITY, EXISTING LONG, BUT THEY
01:32:02.000 --> 01:32:06.000
DON'T RECORD, THEY ONLY CAPTURE LIVE FEED. SO TO MAKE THEM RECORD, THAT'S A NEW
01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:12.000
TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY. AND SO IT IS REQUIRED TO GO THROUGH THAT SAME PROCESS. THE
01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:18.000
SAME THING WOULD BE TRUE FOR OTHER TYPES OF TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES, YOU
KNOW, TO
01:32:18.000 --> 01:32:23.000
BRING THINGS UP TO MODERN STANDARDS. I THINK I USED THE EXAMPLE OF GOING FROM
01:32:23.000 --> 01:32:29.000
BLACK TO WHITE IN THAT REPORT. THE DEPARTMENT CANNOT USE PRIVATELY OWNED 01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:32.000
SECURITY CAMERA. IF THERE IS A CRIME, WE HAVEN'T APPROVED USING 01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:37.000
THE PARTICULAR BUSINESSES SECURITY CAMERAS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSE.
SO THEY
01:32:37.000 --> 01:32:43.000
CAN'T USE THOSE CAMERAS UNLESS WE GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS AND IDENTIFY
ALL THE
01:32:43.000 --> 01:32:49.000
LOCATIONS WHERE IT IS LOUD AND THAT PROCESS. AND STAFF DOESN'T BELIEVE
THAT WAS
01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:53.000
THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE. JUST BASED ON ALL THE LANGUAGE AND THE
ORDINANCE
01:32:53.000 --> 01:32:58.000
ABOUT SORT OF FOCUSING ON THESE MORE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:03.000
THAT THAT IS REALLY THE INTENT, YOU KNOW, A COUNCILMEMBER BROUGHT UP A FEW
01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:08.000
MEETINGS AGO THIS IS A POTENTIAL FUTURE AGENDA ITEM, AND WE LET THEM KNOW THIS
01:33:08.000 --> 01:33:13.000
IS SOMETHING WE WERE WORKING ON TO BRING TO THE COUNCIL, SO YOU COULD BE BEFORE
01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:20.000
YOU FOR DISCUSSION AND THE COUNCIL TO DECIDE. SO WHAT THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT
01:33:20.000 --> 01:33:26.000
WOULD DO IS THAT COUNCIL APPROVAL WOULDN'T BE REQUIRED FOR THE USE OF
SECURITY
01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:29.000
CAMERAS WHETHER PUBLICLY PRIVATELY OWNED AS LONG AS THE SECURITY CAMERA ONLY
01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:37.000
CAPTURES VIDEO AND SOUND, AND DOESN'T HAVE
01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:42.000
ANY OF THESE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES. DOESN'T COLLECT THERMAL, ANY OTHER TYPE
01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:45.000
OF TECHNOLOGY OR RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY. ALL
01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:49.000
WOULD
01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:57.000
STILL REQUIRE APPROVAL. BUT THIS KIND
01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:01.000
OF TECHNOLOGY, CAMERAS, TRADITIONAL CAMERAS, WOULD NOT UNLESS IT'S IN A NEW
01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:04.000
LOCATION, A CITY-OWNED LOCATION. SO IF WE WERE TO INSTALL NEW CAMERAS AT SOME
01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:07.000
CITY PROPERTY, WHERE THEY DON'T CURRENTLY EXIST, THAT WOULD REQUIRE
APPROVAL
01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:12.000
FROM THE CITY COUNCIL. BUT
01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:19.000
USING A PRIVATELY OWNED CAMERA WOULD NOT OR UPGRADING A CITY CAMERA, AS
LONG AS
01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:23.000
THEY STILL ONLY CAPTURE VIDEO AND SOUND WOULD NOT. I'LL NOTE 01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:29.000
THIS IS REALLY
01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:34.000
ABOUT ALLOWING RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC INCIDENTS. SO CAMERAS COULD BE USED
TO VIEW
01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:40.000
SPECIFIC INCIDENTS, YOU KNOW, LIKE CRIMES OF, YOU KNOW, I WOULD SAY
ROBBERY OR
01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:47.000
GRAFFITI AT CITY HALL. YOU WANT TO SEE WHO DOES
01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:50.000
THAT. IT'S NOT ABOUT DATA COLLECTION OR MONITORING. WHILE IT DOES NOT SAY THAT
01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:53.000
EXPLICITLY IN THE ORDINANCE. BUT
01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:57.000
BECAUSE THESE CAMERAS ARE, YOU
01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:01.000
KNOW, THIS BASIC TECHNOLOGY, THERE IS NO -- SOMEONE WOULD HAVE TO
LITERALLY
01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:08.000
MONITOR IT. SO IF YOU WANT TO SEE EVERY PERSON THAT WALKS DOWN THE
STREET,
01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:13.000
SOMEONE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT ALL THAT FOOTAGE TO RECORD THAT. WE'RE NOT 01:35:13.000 --> 01:35:18.000
USING ANY SORT OF HIGH-TECH. SOME OF THESE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY THAT
COULD DO
01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:25.000
THAT AUTOMATICALLY. NONE OF THAT IS SORT OF AUTOMATIC WORK WOULD BE DONE.
SO IT
01:35:25.000 --> 01:35:31.000
WOULD REQUIRE, YOU KNOW, DEDICATING A HUGE AMOUNT OF STAFF RESOURCES TO 01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:37.000
DO THAT KIND OF SURVEILLANCE, AND SO AGAIN, THAT IS WHY THE PURPOSE IS REALLY
01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:42.000
ABOUT GIVING THE CITY TOOLS TO DEAL WITH SPECIFIC INCIDENTS OR PURPOSES.
SO
01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:45.000
TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS IS THE DEFINITION THAT WOULD BE ADDED IF THE 01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:49.000
COUNCIL DECIDED THIS WAS THE ORDINANCE THEY WANTED TO APPROVE, MEANS ANY CAMERA
01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:53.000
THAT IS
01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:57.000
SOLELY CAPABLE OF CAPTURING
01:35:57.000 --> 01:36:00.000
VIDEO. CAPTURING AND RECORDING VIDEO AND/OR AUDIO, YOU
01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:07.000
KNOW, TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS
01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:12.000
DO NOT INCLUDE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING.SIMILAR INFORMATION, INVOLVING THE USE OF
01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:15.000
ANY PREDICTED TECHNOLOGY, SCANNING TECHNOLOGY, ARTIFICIAL TECHNOLOGY, OR 01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:18.000
RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES. SO THINGS LIKE AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READERS OR
01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:21.000
ANYTHING LIKE
01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:28.000
THAT WOULD NOT BE COVERED WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS.
01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:30.000
SO THIS IS THE RELEVANT SECTION IN THE CODE. SAYING WHERE THE CITY
COUNCIL HAS
01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:33.000
TO OBTAIN WHERE APPROVAL IS NECESSARY
01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:37.000
FOR
01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:42.000
THE CITY COUNCIL. SO SEEKING FUNDS RIGHT NOW, COUNCILMEMBER APPROVAL IS
REQUIRED
01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:49.000
FOR SEEKING FUNDS FOR SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:53.000
YOU KNOW, APPLYING FOR GRANTS OR THOSE THINGS. ADDING THE WORD, EXCEPT FOR
01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:58.000
TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERA. AND THIS
01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:01.000
IS ONLY ABOUT FUNDING. ACQUIRING OR BORROWING A NEW SURVEILLANCE
TECHNOLOGY,
01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:04.000
INCLUDING NOT LIMITING
01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:07.000
THE TECHNOLOGY
01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:15.000
WITHOUT THE EXCHANGE MONEYS OR CONSIDERATION. AND I'LL JUST NOTE, YOU
KNOW, THIS
01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:18.000
WOULD STILL HAVE TO BE A BUDGETED EXPENDITURE TO THE CITY'S PROCUREMENT
POLICIES
01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:24.000
AND BUDGET POLICIES. OR USING A NEWER OR EXISTING SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY FOR A
01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:27.000
PURPOSE IN THE MANNER AND THE LOCATION NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL.
01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:30.000
THIS DOES NOT APPLY
01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:35.000
TO TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS, EXCEPT FOR THE USE OF TRADITIONAL
SECURITY
01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:40.000
CAMERAS OWNED BY THE CITY IN A NEW LOCATION. SO AGAIN, IF THE CITY IS
INSTALLING
01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:43.000
SECURITY CAMERAS SOME PLACE NEW, WE WOULD STILL REQUIRE COUNCIL APPROVAL.
BUT
01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:49.000
THIS FACILITATES THE
01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:54.000
USE OF PRIVATE SECURITY CAMERAS. AND THE AGREEMENT FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL 01:37:54.000 --> 01:37:58.000
BEFORE ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT TO USE CAMERAS WITH A THIRD PARTY,
ADDING THE
01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:05.000
LANGUAGE. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE USING TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS FOR A 01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:10.000
SPECIFIC INCIDENT OR EVENT, AS LONG AS SUCH USE IS NOT PART OF AN ONGOING 01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:15.000
ARRANGEMENT WITH A NON-CITY ENTITY. AND AGAIN, THIS LANGUAGE WOULD INTEND TO
01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:20.000
REFLECT ON WHAT I MENTIONED EARLIER, THIS IS ABOUT USING PRIVATE CAMERAS FOR
01:38:20.000 --> 01:38:26.000
SPECIFIC EVENTS. IT'S NOT ABOUT ACCESSING SOMEONE, A PRIVATE SECURITY
CAMERA,
01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:31.000
YOU KNOW, AS PART OF A SURVEILLANCE NETWORK ON A PERMANENT BASIS. THAT WOULD,
01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:37.000
ANY TYPE OF ONGOING ARRANGEMENT WOULD STILL REQUIRE COUNCIL 01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:40.000
APPROVAL. THIS IS ABOUT RESPONDING TO SPECIFIC EVENTS USING, YOU 01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:47.000
KNOW, SOMEONE AGREEING TO GIVE THAT VIEW OF THEIR PRIVATE SECURITY
FOOTAGE
01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:50.000
BECAUSE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WOULD WANT TO LOOK AT SOMETHING FOR A
CRIME, NOT
01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:54.000
A PERMANENT THING. SO IF THE COUNCIL WANTS TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THESE 01:38:54.000 --> 01:38:56.000
AMENDMENTS, THE RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO INTRODUCE AND WAIVE THE FIRST
READING
01:38:56.000 --> 01:39:02.000
OF THE
01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:05.000
ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8.80, THE SEBASTOPOL MUNICIPAL CODE. SO WITH
THAT, I
01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:08.000
WILL PAUSE FOR QUESTIONS.
01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:11.000
>> OKAY. I KNOW VICE MAYOR HAD HER
01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:15.000
HAND UP FIRST.
01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:20.000
>> TWO QUESTIONS. ONE, ISN'T IT TRUE THAT THE POLICE NEED A WARRANT TO
ACCESS A
01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:26.000
PRIVATE CAMERA? THIS DOESN'T GIVE BLANKET ACCESS TO ALL PRIVATE CAMERAS,
IS THAT
01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:33.000
CORRECT? >> SO THIS DOES NOT CHANGE ANY OBLIGATIONS OF THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT
01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:35.000
UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. SO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT NEED A WARRANT TO 01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:40.000
UNILATERALLY ACCESS A PRIVATE CAMERA. SOMEONE CAN VOLUNTARILY COME BRING THEIR,
01:39:40.000 --> 01:39:42.000
YOU KNOW, AND ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN, BUT THIS DOES NOT CHANGE ANY WARRANT 01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:46.000
REQUIREMENTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:51.000
>> OKAY. AND THEN WE RECEIVED A COUPLE E-MAILS ON THIS, AND I'M JUST
GOING TO
01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:57.000
READ A COUPLE SENTENCES FROM THIS ONE E-MAIL, AND I'D LIKE YOUR FEEDBACK
ON WHAT
01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:00.000
THEY'RE SAYING. INSTEAD OF MODIFYING THE ORDINANCE TO CREATE 01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:05.000
A WAY FOR UNACCOUNTABLE NON-TRANSPARENT, WARRANTLESS CITY WIDE DRAGNET 01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:09.000
SURVEILLANCE TOOLS IN YOUR CITY, YOU
01:40:09.000 --> 01:40:13.000
SHOULD
01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:17.000
INSTEAD MODIFY SECTION 8.80.040 TEMPORARY ACQUISITION
01:40:17.000 --> 01:40:26.000
DURING CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ORDINANCE. AND I WOULD LIKE YOUR FEEDBACK ON THIS.
01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:29.000
>> I SAW THAT COMMENT. I'M NOT -- THERE ISN'T AN EXCEPTION IN THERE FOR THE
01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:34.000
EXISTING ORDINANCE WHERE
01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:40.000
THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OR WHOEVER DOESN'T NEED TO -- GO THROUGH THIS 01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:46.000
PROCESS OF THE COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR CIRCUMSTANCES, WHICH ARE, 01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:50.000
LET ME PULL UP THE SORT OF -- I'M GOING
01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:55.000
TO PARAPHRASE WHAT THAT MEANS. BUT IT'S FOR THE
01:40:55.000 --> 01:41:00.000
LIFE AND SAFETY MEDIA, LIFE AND SAFETY NEEDS. AND THE ISSUE WITH THAT
HERE IS
01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:07.000
THAT, YOU KNOW, LET'S SAY A CRIME HAPPENED FIVE DAYS AGO. THERE'S 01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:12.000
NO LONGER ANY EMERGENCY CIRCUMSTANCES. THE CRIME IS IN THE PAST. YOU NO LONGER
01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:17.000
-- THERE'S NO LONGER THE IMMEDIATE RISK TO HEALTH OR SAFETY OR THOSE
SORTS OF
01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:23.000
THINGS, SO IT DOESN'T QUITE MAKE SENSE WE WOULD JUST RELY ON THAT
EXEMPTION
01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:28.000
BECAUSE IT'S NOT GOING TO APPLY IN A LOT OF THESE SITUATIONS. YOU KNOW,
IF THERE
01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:34.000
WAS A LIVE PURSUIT OF, YOU KNOW, GOD FORBID A SHOOTING AND THE POLICE WERE
01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:40.000
CHASING SOMEONE AND WANT TO ACCESS THAT. THAT MIGHT BE A SITUATION WHERE THAT
01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:43.000
WOULD APPLY. BUT IF THERE IS A CRIME IN THE PAST THAT IS NO LONGER 01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:46.000
ONE
01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:51.000
OF THOSE
01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:53.000
IMMEDIATE THREATS TO -- TO HEALTH AND SAFETY. I'M JUST
01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:58.000
PULLING
01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:06.000
UP THE EXACT LANGUAGE THERE.
01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:10.000
>> SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IT WOULDN'T REALLY COVER THE NEEDS THAT ARE BEING
01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:13.000
EXPRESSED RIGHT NOW BY
01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:23.000
THE POLICE DEPARTMENT?
01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:25.000
>> CORRECT. AND JUST TO READ THIS, WHAT IT SAYS IS, YOU KNOW, OPT TO USE THESE
01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:31.000
TECHNOLOGIES DURING CIRCUMSTANCES, WHICH FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS CHAPTER IS
01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:35.000
DEFINED AS AN EMERGENCY INVOLVING IMMINENT DANGER OR DEATH OR SERIOUS
PHYSICAL
01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:38.000
INJURY TO ANY PERSON THAT REQUIRES IMMEDIATE USE OF THE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY.
01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:41.000
SO THAT IMMINENT DANGER
01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:44.000
IS REALLY
01:42:44.000 --> 01:42:47.000
ABOUT THINGS HAPPENING NOW, NOT
01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:50.000
IN A TYPICAL SITUATION.
01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:53.000
>> OKAY. I'M GOING TO GO TO THE RIGHT HERE AND THEN I'LL COME BACK TO THE 01:42:53.000 --> 01:42:58.000
LEFT. GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER HINTON?
01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:02.000
>> OKAY, CAN I ASK A SITUATION? A FEW YEARS AGO, MY CAR WAS BROKEN INTO 01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:07.000
RIGHT HERE ON MORRIS. I WAS AT A BIRTHDAY PARTY AT THE CROOKED GOAT, AND 01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:11.000
SOMEBODY BUSTED OUT MY WINDOWS AND ALL THE OTHER WINDOWS, AND I HAD LEFT MY
01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:16.000
WALLET IN MY GLOVE BOX AND LOST A LOT OF
01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:20.000
CASH AND ALL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION. BECAUSE OF THIS ORDINANCE, WE COULD NOT
01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:27.000
USE THE CAMERAS THAT WERE SET UP ON THE AUTO BODY SHOPS ACROSS THE STREET FROM
01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:31.000
MORRIS TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT AND INVESTIGATE THAT CRIME, CORRECT? 01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:35.000
>> CORRECT. IT WOULD REQUIRE UNDER WHAT THE ORDINANCE SAYS, IT WOULD
REQUIRE
01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:40.000
COUNCIL APPROVAL TO USE ANY CAMERA, INCLUDING PRIVATELY OWNED ONES. 01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:45.000
>> AND JUST TO REITERATE, WE DID HEAR ABOUT THIS ISSUE WITH AN E-MAIL FROM
01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:50.000
DANIELLE AT RETRO GRADE WHO ALSO HAS A CAMERA BEHIND HER SHOP AND HAD A BREAK
01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:54.000
IN, AND WE COULDN'T INVESTIGATE IT BECAUSE WE COULDN'T USE HER OWN CAMERA FOR
01:43:54.000 --> 01:43:57.000
HER OWN CRIME TO MAKE AN ARREST, CORRECT?
01:43:57.000 --> 01:43:59.000
>> CORRECT.
01:43:59.000 --> 01:44:02.000
>> THANK YOU.
01:44:02.000 --> 01:44:05.000
>> GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN?
01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:08.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER MAURER, THANK YOU FOR REFERRING TO THAT E-MAIL BECAUSE I 01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:11.000
ACTUALLY WANT TO FOCUS YOUR ATTENTION ON THE REST OF THE CONTENTS OF THAT 01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:16.000
E-MAIL. SO TO COVER THE SITUATION WITH DANIELLE AND TO COVER THE
SITUATION OF
01:44:16.000 --> 01:44:21.000
COUNCILMEMBER HINTON JUST IDENTIFIED, THE REST OF THIS E-MAIL STATES THAT SHOULD
01:44:21.000 --> 01:44:27.000
WE DECIDE TO DO THIS TO ASSIST OUR
01:44:27.000 --> 01:44:34.000
LAW ENFORCEMENT BY USING TAPES, TAPES FROM OUR EQUIPMENT, FROM PRIVATE
CITIZENS,
01:44:34.000 --> 01:44:37.000
WE COULD ACTUALLY GO THROUGH AND IMPOSE A REQUIREMENT AND THE REST OF
THAT IS
01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:42.000
ACTUALLY IN THIS E-MAIL. THIS PREVISION, WHAT COULD HAPPEN IS
IMPLEMENTING A
01:44:42.000 --> 01:44:46.000
PROVISION FOR A SEVEN-DAY WINDOW FOR THE
01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:52.000
USE OF THE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, MEANING THE FACT IF POLICE WANTED TO ACCESS
01:44:52.000 --> 01:44:57.000
THAT TAPE, THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE SEVEN DAYS TO DO IT, BUT THEY ALSO MUST
01:44:57.000 --> 01:45:03.000
LET US KNOW THE COUNCIL AND KEEP A PAPER TRAIL OF EACH TIME THEY'RE
TRYING TO
01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:08.000
ACCESS SOMETHING IN ORDER TO SERVE, AND TO RESOLVE
01:45:08.000 --> 01:45:12.000
THOSE TYPE OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES. SO IF WE WENT IN THAT DIRECTION AND WE HAVE
01:45:12.000 --> 01:45:16.000
GOTTEN SEVERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS TO ENCOURAGE
01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:21.000
US TO NOT JUST RELINQUISH COUNCIL CONTROL, HOW MUCH STAFF TIME WOULD THAT TAKE
01:45:21.000 --> 01:45:27.000
IN ORDER TO DO WHAT'S IN THE REMAINING PART OF THE E-MAIL THAT YOU
STARTED TO
01:45:27.000 --> 01:45:31.000
READ? >> I DON'T KNOW IF WE ARE PREPARED TO ANSWER THAT. I WOULD SAY THAT IS
01:45:31.000 --> 01:45:38.000
WHAT'S IN THE EXISTING ORDINANCE. IT'S A WORD
01:45:38.000 --> 01:45:44.000
I HAD TROUBLE SAYING, BUT CIRCUMSTANCES ARE IN THERE ALREADY IN SECTION
8.--
01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:48.000
>> THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M GETTING AT. MY QUESTION IS TO RESOLVE DANIELLE'S 01:45:48.000 --> 01:45:52.000
SITUATION AND COUNCILMEMBER HINTON'S SITUATION. IF WE WANTED TO ALLOW
POLICE TO
01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:59.000
ACCESS THAT VIDEO TAPE, BUT WE ALSO
01:45:59.000 --> 01:46:04.000
WANTED THEM TO LET US KNOW ONE MORE REQUEST FOR US TO EVENTUALLY REVIEW THEY
01:46:04.000 --> 01:46:07.000
REQUESTED THAT AND THEN ONLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE TAPES FOR SEVEN DAYS. HOW MUCH
01:46:07.000 --> 01:46:10.000
TIME WOULD THAT TAKE YOU TO
01:46:10.000 --> 01:46:13.000
RETURN BACK TO COUNCIL?
01:46:13.000 --> 01:46:15.000
>> SO I GUESS I WOULD
01:46:15.000 --> 01:46:18.000
SAY, TO DRAFT IT?
01:46:18.000 --> 01:46:21.000
>> YES.
01:46:21.000 --> 01:46:26.000
>> A COUPLE HOURS. STAFF TIME TO IMPLEMENT THAT, I DON'T KNOW. IT SOUNDS LIKE
01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:33.000
JUST TO MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR, WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS WHEN THE POLICE WANTED TO USE
01:46:33.000 --> 01:46:35.000
IT, THEY WOULD MAKE THE REQUEST FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL WOULD
01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:38.000
APPROVE IT?
01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:41.000
>> NO, THEY COULD GO AHEAD, SHOULD THIS BE THE WILL OF THE COUNCIL TO
AUTHORIZE
01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:44.000
THAT, I'M JUST LOOKING FOR TRANSPARENCY.
01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:46.000
>> OH, SO IT WOULD BE --
01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:51.000
>> IT WOULD BE A NOTIFICATION THEY SOUGHT TO USE THAT PORTION OF THE
TAPE, BUT
01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:56.000
ONLY FOR SEVEN DAYS. THEN IT WOULD BE ERASED, SO WE, AS 01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:59.000
COUNCILMEMBERS, COULD KEEP A PAPER TRAIL OF HOW MUCH PRIVATE CITIZEN
VIDEO IS
01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:03.000
BEING ACCESSED AND WHERE.
01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:10.000
>> YEAH, I WOULD DEFER THAT TO MARY OR THE CHIEF. I THINK THAT 01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:15.000
PROBABLY WOULD NOT, THE NOTIFICATION WOULD NOT, YOU KNOW, HAVE EXTENSIVE STAFF
01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:18.000
TIME. I WOULD SAY SEVEN DAYS. INVESTIGATIONS GO ON SOMETIMES LONGER THAN SEVEN
01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:24.000
DAYS. IF YOU'RE CRIMINALLY PROSECUTING SOMEONE THAT
01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:28.000
GOES ON MUCH LONGER. SO JUST OFF THE CUSP, THAT MIGHT BE WHERE THE ISSUE IS. THE
01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:32.000
NULLIFICATION IS PROBABLY NOT AN EXTENSIVE STAFF TIME, BUT I SEE SOME POTENTIAL.
01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:36.000
>> TO CLARIFY WHAT E-MAIL WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE? IT'S BEEN REFERENCED TWICE,
01:47:36.000 --> 01:47:39.000
AND THERE'S A LOT OF E-MAILS ON THIS SUBJECT, AND
01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:44.000
TRYING TO FIND THE ONE THAT IS BEING REFERENCED.
01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:46.000
>> THIS ONE WAS SUBMITTED BY JIM DUFFY TODAY AT 11:30.
01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:51.000
>> THANK YOU.
01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:57.000
>> SO I HAVE MY OWN QUESTION, AND IT IS MY OWN EXPERIENCE. I BELIEVE IT 01:47:57.000 --> 01:48:01.000
WAS ABOUT FIVE YEARS AGO. I HAD MY GARAGE BROKEN
01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:05.000
INTO AND MY CAR ATTEMPTED BREAK-IN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT. BOTH TIMES I HAD
01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:10.000
VIDEO. I TOOK
01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:16.000
IT TO THE POLICE. THE CAR CAR ISSUE, THEY FOUND THAT PERSON BECAUSE I
PROVIDED
01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:20.000
THEM THE VIDEO AND THEN THEY FOUND THAT PERSON THAT DAY. SO AT THAT TIME, I
01:48:20.000 --> 01:48:26.000
MEAN, SO WHAT HAPPENS NOW, RIGHT NOW, IF SOMEONE BROKE INTO MY 01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:31.000
HOUSE AND I PROVIDED VIDEO? WHAT HAPPENS? CAN THAT BE UTILIZED? I'M
HEARING WITH
01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:34.000
SOME OF OUR BUSINESSES THEY'RE SAYING THEY'RE NOT, BUT I KNOW FIVE YEARS AGO, I
01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:40.000
HAD MY OWN EXPERIENCE AND BROUGHT THAT FORTH.
01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:43.000
>> SO THE CURRENT ORDINANCE WAS ADOPTED IN 2022, SO THIS MIGHT HAVE BEEN BEFORE
01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:46.000
THAT.
01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:50.000
>> I'M JUST TRYING TO COMPARE THAT TO NOW AND WHAT WE'RE DOING FOR THE FUTURE.
01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:55.000
BECAUSE IF I DIDN'T HAVE THESE VIDEOS, WE WOULDN'T HAVE FOUND $10,000 01:48:55.000 --> 01:49:00.000
WORTH OF STUFF IN MY HOUSE THAT WAS STOLEN IN ADDITION TO MY CAR. SO I'M JUST
01:49:00.000 --> 01:49:05.000
SAYING. I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THEN, WE COULD UTILIZE THE VIDEOS RIGHT NOW.
01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:09.000
THEY CANNOT BECAUSE OF
01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:12.000
WHAT WE HAVE. SO YOU'RE ASKING FOR THE FUTURE FOR A DECISION TONIGHT TO THEN
01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:16.000
ALLOW THAT AGAIN, RIGHT?
01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:21.000
>> CORRECT. I WOULD DEFER TO THE CHIEF ON HOW OFTEN THIS HAS BEEN THE
ISSUE, BUT
01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:24.000
THERE HAVE BEEN TIMES WHERE THEY HAVE NOT
01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:27.000
BEEN
01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:30.000
ABLE TO USE.
01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:33.000
>> YES, PLEASE.
01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:37.000
>> CAN I ASK WHAT YOUR SPECIFIC QUESTION IS, PLEASE?
01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:40.000
>> I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND, YOU KNOW, FIVE YEARS AGO, THE POLICE
WERE ABLE
01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:45.000
TO USE MY VIDEOS IN ORDER TO
01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:48.000
CATCH THE PEOPLE WHO BROKE INTO MY STUFF. AND NOW, WE CAN'T DO THAT, CORRECT?
01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:53.000
BUT IF I BROUGHT A VIDEO TO YOU NOW, YOU'RE SAYING
01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:56.000
IT COULD NOT BE UTILIZED TO HELP FIND THE PERPETRATORS, RIGHT? 01:49:56.000 --> 01:50:04.000
>> THAT'S CORRECT. I MEAN, WE COULD CERTAINLY HAVE IT SHINED TO US, BUT
WE CAN'T
01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:07.000
USE IT FOR ANY FORM OF PROSECUTION OR USE IT IN THE CASE BECAUSE IT IS
WRITTEN
01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:12.000
INTO THE ORDINANCE CURRENTLY. AND ALEX CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT
THE CITY
01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:17.000
IS LIABLE FOR COSTS IF SOMEONE WERE TO FILE A
01:50:17.000 --> 01:50:23.000
DEFENSE AND FIND WE'VE USED FOOTAGE THAT WAS NOT AUTHORIZED AND THE CITY
BECOMES
01:50:23.000 --> 01:50:26.000
LIABLE FOR THE COST OF THE DEFENSE. SO THE FRUIT OF THE POISON TREE IS WHAT
01:50:26.000 --> 01:50:30.000
WE'RE REFERRING TO.
01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:36.000
>> AND I DON'T KNOW IF THE CITY WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COST, BUT IT
MIGHT BE
01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:39.000
AN ISSUE WHERE THIS, YOU KNOW, EVIDENCE WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE IT VIOLATED OUR
01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:42.000
ORDINANCE TO COLLECT.
01:50:42.000 --> 01:50:47.000
>> I'M SURE IT SAYS IN THERE THAT THEY WOULD BE LIABLE FOR COST? 01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:51.000
>> THERE IS A SEPARATE PROCESS IN HERE THAT WILL CHALLENGE OUR COLLECTION OF IT
01:50:51.000 --> 01:50:54.000
AND SEPARATE FROM ANY CRIMINAL
01:50:54.000 --> 01:50:57.000
PROSECUTION.
01:50:57.000 --> 01:50:59.000
>> OKAY. SO THEN WHAT YOU'RE ASKING TONIGHT, AT LEAST FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND.
01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:05.000
FROM ONE PERSPECTIVE IS YOU WANT TO BE ABLE TO
01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:10.000
UTILIZE THESE TYPES OF VIDEOS LIKE WE COULD IN THE PAST. IS THAT THE
SPIRIT OF
01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:15.000
WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT? I JUST WANT TO CLEARLY UNDERSTAND HOW THIS
01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:19.000
APPLIES REAL WORLD. >> I APPRECIATE THE PUBLIC COMMENT WE'VE HAD AND
PEOPLE'S
01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:25.000
CONCERNS ABOUT CIVIL LIBERTIES. I WOULD ASSERT TO THEM I VALUE THE SAME CIVIL
01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:29.000
LIBERTIES IN THIS COUNTRY, AND I HAVE ZERO INTENTION OF OUR AGENCY USING
THEM IN
01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:32.000
ANY FASHION THAT'S NOT APPROPRIATE FOR PROSECUTION. WE'VE GOT CASES RIGHT NOW
01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:37.000
THAT WE'VE GOT PEOPLE
01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:42.000
ON VIDEO THAT WE CANNOT USE TO FURTHER THAT PROSECUTION AND HOLD THESE PEOPLE
01:51:42.000 --> 01:51:48.000
ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR CRIME, OCCURRING IN THE CITY. TO ME, IT SEEMS TO BE 01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:50.000
CONCERNING THAT YOU HAVE A POLICE DEPARTMENT HERE THAT HAVING THEIR HANDS TIED
01:51:50.000 --> 01:51:55.000
FOR WHAT
01:51:55.000 --> 01:52:01.000
ALEX SAID, VERY BASIC TECHNOLOGY THAT SURROUNDS US. EVERYBODY HAS IT. I
MEAN, WE
01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:04.000
HAVE MORE TRACKING CAPABILITIES ON THEIR CELL PHONES.I GATHER ALL OF YOU HAVE,
01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:07.000
AND WE'RE
01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:11.000
CONCERNED ABOUT BASIC VIDEO CAMERAS. MY SOUL PURPOSE IS TO BE ABLE TO USE THAT
01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:14.000
FOOTAGE TO PROSECUTE TO THE PEOPLE WHO
01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:17.000
COMMIT THE CRIME.
01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:20.000
>> OKAY. COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN?
01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:23.000
>> THANK YOU, CHIEF. TO FOLLOW THAT UP THOUGH, I MEAN, IT IS JUST A MINOR 01:52:23.000 --> 01:52:31.000
CONCERN, GIVEN WHERE WE ARE WITH OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND OUR BROWN
BROTHERS
01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:37.000
AND SISTERS. IT IS A HUGE CONCERN. SO WHAT OPPOSITION WOULD YOU HAVE TO FILING
01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:42.000
SOMETHING ON A REGULAR BASIS? EVERY TIME YOU REQUESTED TO USE CITY CAMERA 01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:47.000
FOOTAGE OR PRIVATE CITIZEN FOOTAGE, I'M ASSUMING YOU WOULD BE 01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:50.000
SOMEWHERE OUT IN THE PUBLIC. SO WHAT HARM WOULD IT BE FOR YOU TO FILE
SOMETHING
01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:55.000
WITH THE
01:52:55.000 --> 01:53:02.000
CITY SAYING YOU REQUESTED CAMERA FOOTAGE ON THIS DAY, FROM THIS PERIOD
FOR THIS
01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:05.000
PURPOSE? AND FILE IT ON A MONTHLY BASIS TO LET US KNOW WHAT SURVEILLANCE IS
01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:09.000
ACTUALLY HAPPENING WITHIN OUR CITY?
01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:12.000
>> I'LL ANSWER THAT QUESTION BY SAYING THERE IS A SUBJECTIVE POLICY HERE IN THE
01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:17.000
CITY THAT REQUIRES WE NOTIFY YOU OF PRETTY MUCH ANYTHING THAT WILL GO ANY WAY.
01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:21.000
SO I WOULD THINK YOU WOULD BE NOTIFIED AT THE TIME BY ME 01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:26.000
OR AT LEAST THE LIEUTENANT OF A SITUATION, WHERE WE ARE INVESTIGATING A CRIME,
01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:32.000
AND WE HAVE OBTAINED SOME FOOTAGE, AND WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO INCLUDE THAT
VERBAGE
01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:36.000
TO NOTIFY YOU AT THE TIME. BUT CIRCLING BACK TO YOUR PREVIOUS COMMENT
ABOUT THE
01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:41.000
SEVEN-DAY RETENTION PERIOD. THAT WOULD BE DIFFICULT FOR US TO MAINTAIN
BECAUSE
01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:45.000
OF THE LENGTH OF TIME IT TAKES TO BRIDGE A DISPOSITION IN SOME SORT OF 01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:50.000
PROSECUTION WITH THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S
01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:56.000
OFFICE AND OUR LEGAL SYSTEM. SO THOSE FOOTAGE, SHOULD SOMEONE APPLY THEM TO THE
01:53:56.000 --> 01:54:00.000
POLICE DEPARTMENT ATTACHED TO THE CASE FILE BECAUSE THEY WILL BE
FORWARDED TO
01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:02.000
THE D.A.'S OFFICE AND USED IN PROSECUTION. DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF CRIME THAT
01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:06.000
IT RELATES, THERE ARE DIFFERENT RETENTION PERIODS,
01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:10.000
SO WE WOULD BE
01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:40.000
GUIDED BY THOSE STATE MANDATES. [ CAPTIONERS TRANSITIONING ] 01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:28.000
>> WE CERTAINLY COULD ADD THAT.YOU KNOW, WE COULD ADD
01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:33.000
, CHANGE SECTION 1 TO SAY,
01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:36.000
WHERE IT SAYS RECITALS TO MAKE THAT SAY RECITALS AND PURPOSE, AND ADD A 01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:41.000
SENTENCE SAYING THE PURPOSE
01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:44.000
IS, WHATEVER LANGUAGE THE COUNCIL MIGHT WANT, AND ADD THAT IN, IF THAT'S THE
01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:48.000
DIRECTION OF THE COUNCIL.
01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:54.000
>> I HAVE A FOLLOW-UP QUESTION, BECAUSE IT DEPENDS UPON WHO IS DEFINING
WHAT AS
01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:58.000
A CRIME. WE HAVE I.C.E. IN OUR CITY, AND DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE COMMUNITY 01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:03.000
BELIEVE THAT OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT WOULD NOT WORK WITH I.C.E., OTHERS
BELIEVE THAT
01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:07.000
THAT IS NOT TRUE. WOULD IT SOLVE COUNCILMEMBER BOWERS QUESTION? 01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:16.000
WOULD IT BE A CRIME
01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:21.000
TO SAY THAT AGENCY, LIKE I.C.E., WHAT WOULD YOUR ADVICE BE IN ORDER 01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:26.000
TO WARRANT ILLICIT USE OF VIDEO CAMERA.
01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:34.000
>> OUR STATE LAW, AND OUR
01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:38.000
ADOPTED RESOLUTION, DON'T ALLOW COOPERATION WITH I.C.E. 01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:45.000
FOR CIVIL IMMIGRATION VIOLATIONS.
01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:51.000
AND SO, THAT'S THE POLICY OF THE CITY, AND STATE LAW.
01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:55.000
I'M THINKING ABOUT THE SECOND HALF OF YOUR QUESTION.
01:56:55.000 --> 01:56:59.000
THIS ORDINANCE
01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:02.000
ALSO ONLY GOVERNS THE CITY,
01:57:02.000 --> 01:57:08.000
THERE IS NOTHING PREVENTING
01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:12.000
I.C.E. FROM GOING TO ACCESS SOMEONE'S CAMERA, GETTING IT VOLUNTARILY, OR 01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:15.000
THROUGH A WARRANT. THIS IS ONLY ABOUT THE CITY'S USE. EVEN IF NOTHING
CHANGED
01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:22.000
HERE, THAT WOULDN'T IMPACT I.C.E. ABILITY
01:57:22.000 --> 01:57:28.000
TO GET PRIVATE SECURITY FOOTAGE. THEY'RE NOT SUBJECT TO OUR ORDINANCE. 01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:34.000
>> THEY COULD STILL OBTAIN CITY FOOTAGE REGARDLESS.
01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:40.000
IT WOULDN'T BE AN OPTION FOR US TO NOT PROVIDE IT TO THEM. AS FAR AS
WORKING
01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:48.000
WITH FEDERAL AGENCIES, SPECIFICALLY I.C.E. , THAT SEEMS TO BE THE HOT TOPIC
01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:52.000
RIGHT NOW. SB 54 IN CALIFORNIA PREVENTS US FROM WORKING WITH THEM. I
LIKEN IT TO
01:57:52.000 --> 01:57:54.000
US INVITING I.C.E. TO COME INTO TOWN AND INVESTIGATE A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 01:57:54.000 --> 01:57:58.000
INCIDENT.
01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:01.000
THEY HAVE THEIR CHARTER AND WE HAVE OURS, AND WE ARE NOT ON THE SAME PAGE. WITH
01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:09.000
OUR RESPECTIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT DUTIES.
01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:16.000
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? WE CAN GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT, MARY. 01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:24.000
>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. THANK YOU, CHIEF.
01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:27.000
>> THIS IS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THE SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE. IF YOU
WOULD LIKE
01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:30.000
TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS HEARING WE WILL DO A TWO MINUTE PUBLIC TIME
01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:32.000
LIMIT. WE WILL DO CHAMBERS FIRST, THEN ZOOM, BACK TO CHAMBERS, THEN ZOOM. 01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:37.000
OLIVER? >>
01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:42.000
I WAS JUST USING A.I. TO GO THROUGH THE HISTORY OF ALL THIS STUFF WHILE
WE WERE
01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:46.000
TALKING. BASICALLY, THIS IS A 2020 THING, AND THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL IS A 01:58:46.000 --> 01:58:52.000
COMPLETE OUTLIER, THE SIZE OF OUR CITY, THIS WAS AFTER THE GEORGE BOYD 01:58:52.000 --> 01:58:58.000
IN 2020, THIS IS AN ACLU ORIGINATING THING, THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL
ADOPTED IN
01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:03.000
2020. WE ARE NOW IN 2026. EVERYTHING
01:59:03.000 --> 01:59:07.000
INCLUDING A.I., EVERYTHING MOVES INCREDIBLY FAST. IT'S CUTE TO BE HEARING ABOUT
01:59:07.000 --> 01:59:11.000
TAPES, I MEAN,
01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:18.000
WE ARE LIVING IN A DIGITAL WORLD, NOW.
01:59:18.000 --> 01:59:21.000
INSTEAD OF THE GRANDIOSE STUFF ABOUT WILL I.C.E. BE ABLE TO SEE THE TAPES AND
01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:25.000
SO ON AND SO FORTH, THE MORE IMPORTANT THING IS THAT THE CITY OF
SEBASTOPOL HAS
01:59:25.000 --> 01:59:28.000
AN AWFUL LOT OF DRIVE BY CRIME. WE HAVE A SERIOUS PROPERTY CRIME PROBLEM.
AND IF
01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:34.000
THE POLICE,
01:59:34.000 --> 01:59:40.000
CAN'T VIEW VIDEO OR TAKE ANY ACTION, IF THEY'VE SEEN ANY VIDEO, GIVEN THAT
01:59:40.000 --> 01:59:47.000
WE'RE THE ONLY PLACE WHO HAS THIS ORDINANCE IN PLACE, IF I WAS A
CRIMINAL,
01:59:47.000 --> 01:59:50.000
SITTING IN A BAR I THINK, THE OBVIOUS PLACE TO GO TO IS THE CITY OF
SEBASTOPOL,
01:59:50.000 --> 01:59:54.000
BECAUSE I'M GOING TO RIP OFF MORE STUFF WITH A MUCH GREATER CHANCE OF
GETTING
01:59:54.000 --> 02:00:00.000
AWAY THAN ANYWHERE ELSE. WHILE WE'RE WORRYING ABOUT THE FEDS AND I.C.E.
AND
02:00:00.000 --> 02:00:06.000
WHATEVER, THE REALITY IS, WE'RE REALLY SHOOTING OURSELVES IN THE FOOT. 02:00:06.000 --> 02:00:10.000
THE ACLU COST US AN ABSOLUTE FORTUNE AND NOW WE HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM
WHERE WE
02:00:10.000 --> 02:00:15.000
HAVE AN ACLU DRIVEN DIRECTIVE WHICH IS GOING TO COST THE CITY 02:00:15.000 --> 02:00:20.000
A LOT OF PETTY CRIME, I WOULD ARGUE. IT'S
02:00:20.000 --> 02:00:24.000
OBVIOUSLY HAVE TO HAVE STRONG CHECKS AND BALANCES. SURVEILLANCE, 02:00:24.000 --> 02:00:28.000
I'M SUPER PARANOID ABOUT SURVEILLANCE MYSELF.
02:00:28.000 --> 02:00:32.000
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, HERE, NOT SOME GRANDIOSE WORLD
02:00:32.000 --> 02:00:35.000
ECONOMIC FORUM, CONSPIRACY, WHATEVER.
02:00:35.000 --> 02:00:40.000
I'M IN FAVOR OF AMENDING.
02:00:40.000 --> 02:00:42.000
>> THAT'S TWO MINUTES.
02:00:42.000 --> 02:00:45.000
>> THANK YOU.
02:00:45.000 --> 02:00:48.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, NEXT GO OUT TO ZOOM, KATE, CAN YOU UNMUTE
02:00:48.000 --> 02:00:53.000
YOURSELF?
02:00:53.000 --> 02:00:58.000
>> THANK YOU, MARY. IT IS CLEAR THAT WE SHOULD AMEND THIS ORDINANCE. IT IS
02:00:58.000 --> 02:01:03.000
COMMON SENSE. SEBASTOPOL HAS AN ONGOING ISSUE WITH THEFT, GRAFFITI ON
PUBLIC AND
02:01:03.000 --> 02:01:09.000
PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND PROPERTY DAMAGE. WE JUST HEARD THREE STORIES
TONIGHT
02:01:09.000 --> 02:01:13.000
REGARDING THEFT THAT INVOLVED TWO OF OUR COUNCIL PEOPLE. SEBASTOPOL HAS A HIGH
02:01:13.000 --> 02:01:18.000
RATE OF CRIME RELATIVE TO OUR POPULATION AND OTHER CITIES. 02:01:18.000 --> 02:01:23.000
SEBASTOPOL HAS A HUGE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT
02:01:23.000 --> 02:01:28.000
FLOWS THROUGH IT. WE HAVE A MAJOR HIGH SCHOOL, WE HAVE A HOME KEY PROJECT 02:01:28.000 --> 02:01:33.000
DOWNTOWN WHERE THERE IS ACTIVE DRUG USE AND DRUG DEALING, WE NEED TO BE
ABLE TO
02:01:33.000 --> 02:01:38.000
USE CAMERA FOOTAGE TO PROSECUTE CRIME. WHAT IF SOMEONE BREAKS INTO YOUR HOUSE
02:01:38.000 --> 02:01:42.000
AND THE POLICE CANNOT USE THE FOOTAGE FROM YOUR CAMERA TO FIND THE BURGLAR?
02:01:42.000 --> 02:01:47.000
WHAT IF THERE'S A THAT TARGETS SEBASTOPOL BECAUSE NO ONE CAN USE THEIR CAMERA
02:01:47.000 --> 02:01:53.000
FOOTAGE IN ORDER TO PROSECUTE THE PERSON.
02:01:53.000 --> 02:01:59.000
WE CANNOT HAVE SEBASTOPOL BE A SMALL SECURITY HOLE WITHIN LARGER WEST COUNTY.
02:01:59.000 --> 02:02:03.000
SEBASTOPOL IS A TINY TWO SQUARE MILE PATCH WITHIN A HUGE AREA. SEBASTOPOL NEEDS
02:02:03.000 --> 02:02:10.000
TO BE ABLE TO WORK WITH LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY
02:02:10.000 --> 02:02:15.000
AND BE ABLE TO PROSECUTE CRIMINALS THAT BREAK THE LAW.
02:02:15.000 --> 02:02:18.000
ONCE AGAIN ASKS THE QUESTION, DOES THIS CHANGE BENEFIT THE CITIZENS OF 02:02:18.000 --> 02:02:22.000
SEBASTOPOL? THE ANSWER IS CLEARLY YES,
02:02:22.000 --> 02:02:28.000
IT WOULD HAVE BENEFITED COUNCILMEMBER HINTON, IT WOULD HAVE BENEFITED LOCAL
02:02:28.000 --> 02:02:32.000
BUSINESS OWNER OF RETRO GROWTH. DOES IT BENEFIT LOCAL BUSINESSES? 02:02:32.000 --> 02:02:36.000
THE ANSWER IS YES BECAUSE OUR BUSINESSES ARE TARGETED WITH THEFT ALL THE TIME.
02:02:36.000 --> 02:02:40.000
IT IS CLEAR THAT YOU SHOULD SUPPORT THE CHANGE OF THIS ORDINANCE, SO THAT 02:02:40.000 --> 02:02:46.000
CRIMINALS CAN BE PROSECUTED. THANK YOU.
02:02:46.000 --> 02:02:51.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, NEXT I WILL COME BACK TO CHAMBERS. 02:02:51.000 --> 02:02:55.000
IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS AND WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT? SEEING
02:02:55.000 --> 02:03:00.000
NONE, I WILL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. OMAR, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? 02:03:00.000 --> 02:03:08.000
>> YES, THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND STAFF. 02:03:08.000 --> 02:03:12.000
I NAME IS OMAR FIGARO, I AM A PARENT AND BUSINESS OWNER HERE IN SEBASTOPOL.
02:03:12.000 --> 02:03:15.000
I AM ASKING YOU TO NOT INTRODUCE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE
SURVEILLANCE
02:03:15.000 --> 02:03:21.000
TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNITY SAFETY ORDINANCE. I WORKED WITH A FORMER POLICE CHIEF
02:03:21.000 --> 02:03:25.000
RON NELSON FOR OVER A YEAR IN CRAFTING THIS ORDINANCE. NEVER ONCE DID WE THINK
02:03:25.000 --> 02:03:34.000
THAT THIS ORDINANCE WOULD PROHIBIT THE USE OF PRIVATE SECURITY CAMERA
RECORDINGS
02:03:34.000 --> 02:03:38.000
TO AID IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND APPREHENSION. POLICE CHIEF NELSON WOULD
02:03:38.000 --> 02:03:41.000
NEVER HAVE APPROVED THIS ORDINANCE IF IT HAD DONE THAT. WHEN THIS
ORDINANCE WAS
02:03:41.000 --> 02:03:46.000
ADOPTED,
02:03:46.000 --> 02:03:49.000
THE CITY RECOGNIZED THE SIMPLE TRUTH. SURVEILLANCE TOOLS CAN WATCH PEOPLE AS
02:03:49.000 --> 02:03:54.000
THEY GO ABOUT THEIR DAILY LIVES, AND CAN AFFECT PRIVACY AND LIBERTY.
BECAUSE OF
02:03:54.000 --> 02:03:58.000
THAT, THE COMMUNITY WAS PROMISED NOTICE AND PUBLIC DISCUSSION BEFORE 02:03:58.000 --> 02:04:03.000
SURVEILLANCE EXPENSE. WE ARE TOLD THIS CHANGE IS NEEDED BECAUSE THE
PROCESS
02:04:03.000 --> 02:04:06.000
TAKES TIME. THE PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE WAS NEVER SPEED. THE PURPOSE 02:04:06.000 --> 02:04:14.000
WAS TRUST. THE ORDINANCE ALREADY ALLOWS IMMEDIATE USE OF SURVEILLANCE 02:04:14.000 --> 02:04:23.000
TECHNOLOGY IN EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES. SO THE DELAY BEING DISCUSSED ONLY
APPLIES
02:04:23.000 --> 02:04:28.000
, THAT IS HOW PUBLIC TRUST IS PROTECTED. RIGHT NOW THE COUNCIL REVIEWS 02:04:28.000 --> 02:04:34.000
EXPANSION, THE PROPOSAL REVIEWS A BROAD CATEGORY OF CAMERA USES AND
UPGRADES
02:04:34.000 --> 02:04:38.000
THAT CURRENTLY COME BEFORE YOU. IT SHIPS DECISIONS AWAY FROM PUBLIC 02:04:38.000 --> 02:04:41.000
DELIBERATION AND TOWARD ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION. ONCE THAT AUTHORITY IS 02:04:41.000 --> 02:04:45.000
SURRENDERED, IT IS DIFFICULT
02:04:45.000 --> 02:04:48.000
TO RECLAIM. SMALL CHANGES BECOME BIG CHANGES, A CAMERA USED ONE WAY TODAY CAN
02:04:48.000 --> 02:04:54.000
BE USED ANOTHER WAY TOMORROW. TECHNOLOGY
02:04:54.000 --> 02:04:56.000
CONNECTS, GROWS, AND IMPROVES. THE REVIEW PROCESS IS THE MOMENT WHEN THE 02:04:56.000 --> 02:05:00.000
COMMUNITY CAN ASK WHETHER THE INCREASING USE OF SECURITY CAMERAS STILL
MATCHES
02:05:00.000 --> 02:05:03.000
OUR SMALL TOWN VALUES. THIS IS NOT ABOUT OPPOSING THE POLICE. 02:05:03.000 --> 02:05:06.000
>> THAT IS TWO MINUTES.
02:05:06.000 --> 02:05:10.000
>> THANK YOU.
02:05:10.000 --> 02:05:13.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT I WILL COME BACK TO CHAMBERS IF
02:05:13.000 --> 02:05:16.000
THERE'S ANYONE IN CHAMBERS.
02:05:16.000 --> 02:05:21.000
>> RAISE YOUR HAND.
02:05:21.000 --> 02:05:24.000
>> THANK YOU, OMAR. I WILL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. WOODY, CAN YOU UNMUTE
YOURSELF,
02:05:24.000 --> 02:05:27.000
PLEASE? >> I JUST UNMUTED.
02:05:27.000 --> 02:05:31.000
>> I CAN HEAR YOU, CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
02:05:31.000 --> 02:05:33.000
>> I CAN, YES, THANKS.
02:05:33.000 --> 02:05:38.000
>> GO AHEAD WITH YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT.
02:05:38.000 --> 02:05:42.000
>> MY NAME IS WOODY HASTINGS, I LIVE IN THE 95473 Z.I.P. CODE. THE WAY
THIS WAS
02:05:42.000 --> 02:05:45.000
PRESENTED TONIGHT MAKES IT SOUND SO INNOCUOUS AND REASONABLE AND PARTS OF IT MAY
02:05:45.000 --> 02:05:49.000
BE.
02:05:49.000 --> 02:05:52.000
LIKE THE ABILITY TO USE PRIVATE VIDEOS. WITH PEOPLE BEING SHOT IN THE
STREET BY
02:05:52.000 --> 02:05:56.000
GOVERNMENT FORCES, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT ANY INCREASE IN POLICE
SURVEILLANCE
02:05:56.000 --> 02:05:59.000
CAPABILITIES. THESE TECHNOLOGIES CAN BE WESTERNIZED, FACILITATE THE 02:05:59.000 --> 02:06:03.000
DEPORTATIONS, TARGET POLITICAL
02:06:03.000 --> 02:06:08.000
-- I WANT TO TALK SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
02:06:08.000 --> 02:06:13.000
ONE OF THE MAIN CONCERNS, WHICH IS SECTION 3B IN THE ORDINANCE. IT'S ABOUT
02:06:13.000 --> 02:06:19.000
SHARING TRADITIONAL VIDEOS, OLD-SCHOOL VIDEOS WITH OUTSIDE ENTITIES. THIS 02:06:19.000 --> 02:06:23.000
PROVISION IS UNACCEPTABLE. A NON-CITY ENTITY CAN EASILY BE A MALEVOLENT 02:06:23.000 --> 02:06:30.000
ENTITY OR BECOME ONE. IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT IT'S FOR NOT AN ONGOING 02:06:30.000 --> 02:06:34.000
ARRANGEMENT, ACCESS ONCE TO A VIDEO CAN DO DAMAGE IN THE WRONG HANDS. THE 02:06:34.000 --> 02:06:38.000
PROBLEM IS THE TRADITIONAL VIDEO CAN BE PROCESSED WITH A.I. 02:06:38.000 --> 02:06:43.000
TO REVEAL INFORMATION THAT IS NOT DISCERNIBLE SIMPLY BY WATCHING THE VIDEO.
02:06:43.000 --> 02:06:46.000
THIS INCLUDES HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL DATA, MAGNIFICATION OF OTHERWISE 02:06:46.000 --> 02:06:49.000
IMPERCEPTIBLE MOTION, COMBINATION WITH OTHER DATA TO REVEAL BEHAVIOR 02:06:49.000 --> 02:06:54.000
CHARACTERISTICS AND PATTERNS AND FORENSICALLY REVEAL OTHER SENSITIVE
INFORMATION
02:06:54.000 --> 02:07:00.000
THAT CAN BE USED AGAINST INNOCENT SEBASTOPOL
02:07:00.000 --> 02:07:04.000
RESIDENTS. PLEASE DON'T ERODE OUR PRIVACY FURTHER THAN IT ALREADY IS. AT THIS
02:07:04.000 --> 02:07:10.000
TIME, MY REQUEST IS THAT YOU DELAY ANY DECISION-MAKING ABOUT THIS
AMENDMENT
02:07:10.000 --> 02:07:14.000
, THE BEN FRANKLIN QUOTE COMES TO MIND, AND FRANKLIN SAID THOSE WHO WOULD GIVE
02:07:14.000 --> 02:07:17.000
UP ESSENTIAL LIBERTY TO PURCHASE A LITTLE SAFETY DESERVE NEITHER LIBERTY NOR
02:07:17.000 --> 02:07:20.000
SAFETY. THANK YOU.
02:07:20.000 --> 02:07:28.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT.
02:07:28.000 --> 02:07:32.000
NEXT I'M GOING TO COME INTO CHAMBERS. IF THERE'S ANYONE IN CHAMBERS.
SEEING
02:07:32.000 --> 02:07:34.000
NONE, I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM, MICHAEL, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? 02:07:34.000 --> 02:07:37.000
>> I CAN. CAN YOU HEAR ME?
02:07:37.000 --> 02:07:40.000
>> I CAN, CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
02:07:40.000 --> 02:07:44.000
>> I CAN.
02:07:44.000 --> 02:07:49.000
>> MY NAME IS MICHAEL, I WANTED TO ADD TO THE LIST, A WEEK AGO THIS LAST WEEK
02:07:49.000 --> 02:07:53.000
I RODE HOME FROM MY SHOP ON MY BICYCLE,
02:07:53.000 --> 02:07:58.000
I WAS IN THE HOUSE FOR MAYBE AN HOUR, WENT BACK OUT TO GET ON IT TO WRITE BACK
02:07:58.000 --> 02:08:02.000
DOWN TO THE SHOP, AND MY BICYCLE HAD BEEN STOLEN OUT OF MY DRIVEWAY. I WAS
02:08:02.000 --> 02:08:10.000
SURPRISED TO LEARN THAT THE CAMERAS ON THE NEIGHBORS NEXT DOOR 02:08:10.000 --> 02:08:16.000
, WHICH THEY HAVE PLENTY OF THE DENTIST OFFICE, WOULD BE USELESS, THAT THEY
02:08:16.000 --> 02:08:22.000
COULDN'T ACTUALLY ACCESS THEM. I WOULD SAY THAT I WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF
AMENDING
02:08:22.000 --> 02:08:29.000
THE ORDINANCE, HERE. A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS THAT I HAD WAS, HOW DOES THAT
PERTAIN
02:08:29.000 --> 02:08:35.000
TO PRIVATE CELL PHONE VIDEOS? THAT THERE IS SOME SORT OF EVENT, SAY YOU
WITNESS
02:08:35.000 --> 02:08:42.000
SOMETHING AND YOU FILM IT, THE OTHER THING IS WHAT ABOUT DASH CAM VIDEO'S?
02:08:42.000 --> 02:08:49.000
THAT ARE PRIVATELY OWNED, AND THEY WERE WITNESS TO A MAJOR ACCIDENT OF SOME
02:08:49.000 --> 02:08:52.000
SORT? I THINK THAT MAY BE THE AMENDMENTS COULD BE TWEAKED A LITTLE BIT TO MAKE
02:08:52.000 --> 02:08:56.000
SURE THAT THOSE APPARATUS
02:08:56.000 --> 02:09:00.000
AND THOSE VIDEOS THAT ARE RECORDED ARE ALSO AVAILABLE TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.
02:09:00.000 --> 02:09:06.000
THANK YOU.
02:09:06.000 --> 02:09:11.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, NEXT I WILL COME BACK INTO THE CHAMBERS.
02:09:11.000 --> 02:09:17.000
SEEING NONE I WILL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF PLEASE? 02:09:17.000 --> 02:09:23.000
>> MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, MAYOR, JIM DUFFY, THANK YOU FOR TAKING MY 02:09:23.000 --> 02:09:27.000
COMMENTS. THE SEBASTOPOL POLICE DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE CAMERA
02:09:27.000 --> 02:09:32.000
FOOTAGE FROM LEGALLY PLACED AND OPERATED PRIVATE SECURITY CAMERAS AND
DOORBELL
02:09:32.000 --> 02:09:37.000
CAMERAS AS PART OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS. THIS IS WHAT I SAID IN THE LETTER
02:09:37.000 --> 02:09:41.000
THAT SOME OF YOU WERE QUOTING FROM. I'M GOING TO GO TO THE BOTTOM OF THE NEXT
02:09:41.000 --> 02:09:47.000
PARAGRAPH, THAT'S THE PIECE THAT YOU GUYS WERE MISSING. CURRENTLY YOUR CITY
02:09:47.000 --> 02:09:50.000
DEFINES EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES AS EMERGENCIES INVOLVING IMMINENT DANGER OF DEATH
02:09:50.000 --> 02:09:54.000
OR SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURY TO ANY PERSON
02:09:54.000 --> 02:09:58.000
THAT REQUIRES THE IMMEDIATE USE OF SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY OR INFORMATION IT
02:09:58.000 --> 02:10:04.000
PROVIDES. YOU SHOULD BROADEN THIS DEFINITION.
02:10:04.000 --> 02:10:09.000
TO INCLUDE THE TYPES OF CRIMES THAT YOUR POLICE DEPARTMENT BELIEVES 02:10:09.000 --> 02:10:13.000
, I'VE GOT TO SAY BELIEVES BECAUSE I'VE HEARD SOME OTHER LAWYERS WHO SAID THAT
02:10:13.000 --> 02:10:18.000
THEY CAN USE THESE CAMERAS AS IT'S WRITTEN, BELIEVES THEY WERE FORBIDDEN TO
02:10:18.000 --> 02:10:26.000
INVESTIGATE DUE TO YOUR CURRENT ORDINANCE. I'M TOTALLY IN SUPPORT 02:10:26.000 --> 02:10:32.000
OF POLICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY, WE DO NOT WANT TO BLOW A HOLE IN THIS BY
ALLOWING
02:10:32.000 --> 02:10:35.000
DRAGNET SURVEILLANCE WITH CAMERAS ALL OVER THE CITY UNLESS YOU'RE GOING TO PUT
02:10:35.000 --> 02:10:42.000
A SURVEILLANCE USE ORDINANCE IN PLACE SPECIFICALLY FOR THOSE CAMERAS
WHERE YOU
02:10:42.000 --> 02:10:47.000
DEFINE THE PARTS THAT ARE TALKED ABOUT IN THE ORDINANCE, THE PURPOSE 02:10:47.000 --> 02:10:53.000
, THE AUTHORIZED USED, DATA COLLECTION, DATA ACCESS, PROTECTION,
RETENTION, ET
02:10:53.000 --> 02:10:59.000
CETERA. THAT ARE CURRENTLY LISTED IN THE ORDINANCE.
02:10:59.000 --> 02:11:03.000
I WANT TO ADDRESS THE 70 REQUIREMENT, THE SEVEN-DAY REQUIREMENT IS HOW
MUCH OF
02:11:03.000 --> 02:11:08.000
THE PRIVATE CAMERA FOOTAGE YOU CAN REQUEST
02:11:08.000 --> 02:11:12.000
FOR YOUR INVESTIGATION. YOU CAN ONLY REQUEST THE SEVEN-DAY PERIOD ON THAT 02:11:12.000 --> 02:11:17.000
PRIVATE CAMERA. POLICE DEPARTMENT CAN HOLD ONTO IT FOREVER IF THEY FEEL
LIKE IT,
02:11:17.000 --> 02:11:21.000
YOU SHOULD HAVE A POLICY THAT MAKES YOU GET RID OF IT EVENTUALLY. 02:11:21.000 --> 02:11:24.000
>> TWO MINUTES FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
02:11:24.000 --> 02:11:27.000
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
02:11:27.000 --> 02:11:31.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT I WILL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS.
02:11:31.000 --> 02:11:34.000
SEEING NONE I WILL GO BACK OUT, ROBERT, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? 02:11:34.000 --> 02:11:37.000
>> YES.
02:11:37.000 --> 02:11:39.000
>> THANK YOU, CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
02:11:39.000 --> 02:11:42.000
>> I CAN.
02:11:42.000 --> 02:11:45.000
>> GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
02:11:45.000 --> 02:11:48.000
>> WHERE TO START. THIS WAS AN ACLU WRITTEN ORDINANCE AS I RECALL, THERE WAS A
02:11:48.000 --> 02:11:53.000
LOT OF DISCUSSION AROUND THE PROBLEMS
02:11:53.000 --> 02:11:58.000
IDENTIFYING PEOPLE FROM VIDEOS, WITH PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS, AND 02:11:58.000 --> 02:12:04.000
THERE WAS PUBLIC FEEDBACK IN THE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE FACT THAT 02:12:04.000 --> 02:12:07.000
THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL DOESN'T NEED, WANT, HAVE THE MONEY, OR INTEREST IN 02:12:07.000 --> 02:12:10.000
ACQUIRING ANY OF THAT TECHNOLOGY. THAT WAS THE WHOLE DISCUSSION. NOBODY DURING
02:12:10.000 --> 02:12:13.000
THAT DISCUSSION SAID LOOK AT ALL THIS OTHER SECURITY STUFF THAT WE ALL
HAVE LIKE
02:12:13.000 --> 02:12:19.000
RING BELL DOOR CAMERAS.
02:12:19.000 --> 02:12:22.000
YOU CAN'T USE ANY OF THAT EITHER, THAT DIDN'T COME UP IN THE DISCUSSION BACK
02:12:22.000 --> 02:12:28.000
THEN. AND I'M REALLY,
02:12:28.000 --> 02:12:32.000
JUST OFF. THIS THING, THIS ORDINANCE WAS SUPPOSED TO MAKE US 02:12:32.000 --> 02:12:36.000
INFLUENCE OTHER CITIES, NONE OF THAT HAPPENED. NO OTHER CITIES HAS
ANYTHING
02:12:36.000 --> 02:12:41.000
LIKE THIS. ALL OF THEM ARE USING MORE SOPHISTICATED SURVEILLANCE THAN
WHAT WE
02:12:41.000 --> 02:12:47.000
HAVE HERE, AND IT DOESN'T APPEAR TO BE CAUSING BIG PROBLEMS. 02:12:47.000 --> 02:12:51.000
WE DID ALL OF THIS FOR AN IDEOLOGY, AND IT COST US, AS INDIVIDUALS IN THIS
02:12:51.000 --> 02:12:55.000
CITY. IF SOMEBODY BREAKS INTO YOUR HOUSE,
02:12:55.000 --> 02:13:00.000
DESTROYS YOUR CAR, ATTACKS YOUR FAMILY,
02:13:00.000 --> 02:13:05.000
AND YOU HAVE A CAMERA OR THERE'S A CAMERA THAT COULD HELP TO IDENTIFY
THEM AND
02:13:05.000 --> 02:13:09.000
CAPTURE THEM, YOU'RE TELLING ME IT CAN'T BE USED, AND EVERYBODY IS OKAY WITH
02:13:09.000 --> 02:13:12.000
THIS? THIS WHOLE ORDINANCE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT BECAUSE NOBODY
UNDERSTANDS,
02:13:12.000 --> 02:13:16.000
THERE ARE STATE LAWS THAT COVER ALL OF THIS STUFF,
02:13:16.000 --> 02:13:19.000
WE'RE NOT ANYBODY'S EXAMPLE OF ANYTHING AS IT RELATES TO STUFF LIKE THIS.
I'M
02:13:19.000 --> 02:13:26.000
SORRY. IT'S JUST CRAZY.
02:13:26.000 --> 02:13:29.000
AND WHAT'S THE SEVEN-DAY THING? WHAT IF SOMETHING BREAKS INTO YOUR HOUSE, WHAT
02:13:29.000 --> 02:13:33.000
IF YOU DON'T COME BACK FOR TWO OR THREE WEEKS? SEVEN DAYS? CAN'T USE THAT CAMERA
02:13:33.000 --> 02:13:35.000
TO IDENTIFY WHO STOLE ALL YOUR STUFF. THANK YOU, THAT'S ALL. 02:13:35.000 --> 02:13:42.000
>> THANK YOU,
02:13:42.000 --> 02:13:44.000
NEXT I WILL STAY OUT ON ZOOM, JUNE, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? CAN YOU GO
02:13:44.000 --> 02:13:50.000
AHEAD FOR PUBLIC COMMENT?
02:13:50.000 --> 02:13:55.000
>> SO I'M HEARING THE CONCERNS ABOUT WHERE THIS ORDINANCE HASN'T BEEN
USEFUL,
02:13:55.000 --> 02:14:00.000
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, AND THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS DON'T ACTUALLY MATCH THE
02:14:00.000 --> 02:14:06.000
CONCERNS. THE CONCERNS ARE ABOUT USING PRIVATE VIDEO FOR CRIME. 02:14:06.000 --> 02:14:13.000
BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT'S IN THE ORDINANCE, THE ORDINANCE IS AN EXCEPTION FOR 02:14:13.000 --> 02:14:19.000
CERTAIN TYPE OF OLD TECHNOLOGY. SO THAT WOULD MEAN, IF YOU HAVE PRIVATE VIDEO
02:14:19.000 --> 02:14:22.000
THAT WAS HIGH-TECHNOLOGY, MAYBE SOME A.I. FEATURES IN YOUR RING TONE
CAMERA,
02:14:22.000 --> 02:14:27.000
YOU STILL COULDN'T USE IT FOR THE POLICE. SO WE DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT
AMENDMENTS
02:14:27.000 --> 02:14:31.000
HERE. BUT, THIS CURRENT PROPOSAL DOES DO IS IT MAKES ALL SORTS OF
EXCEPTIONS FOR
02:14:31.000 --> 02:14:38.000
ANYTHING WITH THAT OLD TECHNOLOGY.
02:14:38.000 --> 02:14:43.000
SAYING IT'LL BE HARMLESS IF WE CAN DO WHATEVER WE WANT WITH THAT OLD VIDEO
02:14:43.000 --> 02:14:49.000
BECAUSE IT DOESN'T HAVE A.I. IN IT, BUT YOU HAND OVER A PHOTOGRAPH OR A
BUNCH OF
02:14:49.000 --> 02:14:55.000
OLD VIDEO TO THE FEDERAL ADMINISTRATION, THEY CAN PUT A.I. ON IT. THEY KNOW
02:14:55.000 --> 02:15:00.000
WHERE IT CAME FROM, AND WE HAVE GOOD FOLK TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RIGHT NOW,
02:15:00.000 --> 02:15:08.000
BUT SOMEBODY ELSE COULD DECIDE THEY WANT TO TURN OVER ALL SORTS 02:15:08.000 --> 02:15:12.000
OF CITY STAFF, AND WHAT THIS ALLOWS, IT SAYS WE CAN DO NEW AGREEMENTS. WE CAN
02:15:12.000 --> 02:15:17.000
DO FUNDING AGREEMENTS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND NOT TELL YOU. WE CAN DO
02:15:17.000 --> 02:15:21.000
ALL SORTS OF NEW THINGS AND NOT TELL YOU. IF WE WANT TO DO NEW THINGS,
COME TO
02:15:21.000 --> 02:15:27.000
THE COUNCIL AND WE CAN APPROVE THEM. AND LET'S ACTUALLY SOLVE THIS
CONCERN
02:15:27.000 --> 02:15:30.000
ABOUT PRIVATE VIDEO, A LOT OF PEOPLE SO YOU COULD USE PRIVATE VIDEO RIGHT NOW
02:15:30.000 --> 02:15:37.000
IF THERE NEEDS TO BE CLARIFICATION, COME BACK WITH THAT CLARIFICATION. TO COVER
02:15:37.000 --> 02:15:44.000
ALL SORTS OF TECHNOLOGY. BUT, DON'T GIVE AWAY OUR PHOTOS TO ANY ENTITY
AND NOT
02:15:44.000 --> 02:15:47.000
TELL US AND ENTER NEW MONITOR AGREEMENTS WITH NEW ENTITIES AND NOT TELL US. THAT
02:15:47.000 --> 02:15:53.000
THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE WOULD ALLOW. THANK YOU.
02:15:53.000 --> 02:15:56.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT I WILL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS.
02:15:56.000 --> 02:15:59.000
SEEING NONE I WILL GO BACK OUT, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? 02:15:59.000 --> 02:16:07.000
CAN YOU HEAR US?
02:16:07.000 --> 02:16:10.000
>> YES, I CAN, I'M TRYING TO MAKE MY VIDEO WORK BUT I GUESS YOU'LL JUST
HAVE TO
02:16:10.000 --> 02:16:13.000
SEE MY PICTURE.
02:16:13.000 --> 02:16:18.000
>> CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
02:16:18.000 --> 02:16:22.000
>> I CAN. MY NAME IS EUNA GLASS, I'M THE FORMER MAYOR OF SEBASTOPOL, I'M ONE OF
02:16:22.000 --> 02:16:32.000
THE AUTHORS OF THIS PARTICULAR ORDINANCE, WHICH IS BEING MALIGNED AT THIS 02:16:32.000 --> 02:16:35.000
MOMENT. I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT AS FAR AS I CAN SEE, THIS ORDINANCE
NEITHER IN
02:16:35.000 --> 02:16:42.000
WORD NOR IN INTENT
02:16:42.000 --> 02:16:45.000
WAS MEANT TO PRECLUDE PEOPLE FROM USING THEIR PRIVATE VIDEOS FOR OUR POLICE
02:16:45.000 --> 02:16:49.000
DEPARTMENT USING PRIVATE VIDEOS
02:16:49.000 --> 02:16:54.000
FROM PRIVATELY USED SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, IN OTHER WORDS, PEOPLE'S
SECURITY
02:16:54.000 --> 02:16:57.000
SYSTEMS IN THEIR BUSINESSES AND IN THEIR HOMES, FROM THAT BEING USED TO EITHER
02:16:57.000 --> 02:17:02.000
SOLVE
02:17:02.000 --> 02:17:08.000
OR PROSECUTE CRIMES. I DO NOT KNOW WHERE THIS IDEA CAME FROM. 02:17:08.000 --> 02:17:11.000
IF OUR CITY ATTORNEY SEEMS TO THINK THIS IS TRUE, THEN I THINK THE CITY SHOULD
02:17:11.000 --> 02:17:16.000
GET AN OUTSIDE COUNCIL TO EVALUATE THE WORDING,
02:17:16.000 --> 02:17:22.000
IN OUR ORDINANCE, BECAUSE THAT WAS CERTAINLY NOT ITS INTENT. I HAVE NO IDEA
02:17:22.000 --> 02:17:30.000
WHERE THIS IS COMING FROM. I DO THINK THAT AT THIS TIME, MORE THAN EVER,
WHAT WE
02:17:30.000 --> 02:17:37.000
NEED IS PUBLIC OVERSIGHT OVER SURVEILLANCE. THAT DOES NOT MEAN REMOVING
THE CITY
02:17:37.000 --> 02:17:40.000
COUNCILS OBLIGATION TO REVIEW THE KINDS OF SURVEILLANCE THAT WE ARE
PUTTING IN
02:17:40.000 --> 02:17:47.000
PLACE
02:17:47.000 --> 02:17:51.000
ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC USING PUBLIC FUNDS. SO, OF ALL TIMES, THIS SEEMS LIKE
02:17:51.000 --> 02:17:54.000
THE WORST OF TIMES TO BE ASSERTING THAT WE SHOULD BE BACKING OFF OF PUBLIC
02:17:54.000 --> 02:17:59.000
OVERSIGHT
02:17:59.000 --> 02:18:05.000
OF THE KIND OF SURVEILLANCE THAT WE'RE USING IN OUR CITY. THANK YOU. 02:18:05.000 --> 02:18:08.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT I WILL COME BACK INTO
CHAMBERS,
02:18:08.000 --> 02:18:11.000
SEEING NONE I WILL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. MAGNESS, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, 02:18:11.000 --> 02:18:15.000
PLEASE?
02:18:15.000 --> 02:18:20.000
>> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS AND STAFF. MY NAME IS MAGNESS FIGARO A.
02:18:20.000 --> 02:18:25.000
I'M 15 YEARS OLD, A HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT AND WAS BORN AND RAISED IN SEBASTOPOL.
02:18:25.000 --> 02:18:29.000
I'M ASKING YOU NOT INTRODUCE THE AMENDMENT TO THE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY AND
02:18:29.000 --> 02:18:32.000
COMMUNITY SAFETY ORDINANCE. I WANT TO EXPLAIN WHAT THIS FEELS LIKE FROM MY
02:18:32.000 --> 02:18:36.000
PERSPECTIVE AND THE PERSPECTIVE OF PEOPLE MY AGE.
02:18:36.000 --> 02:18:40.000
AFTER SCHOOL A LOT OF US GO DOWNTOWN. WE SIT IN THE PLAZA, GET I.C.E.
CREAM,
02:18:40.000 --> 02:18:42.000
TALK AND HANG OUT. MOST OF THE TIME WE'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING WRONG, JUST 02:18:42.000 --> 02:18:47.000
FIGURING OUT WHO WE ARE.
02:18:47.000 --> 02:18:51.000
WHEN THERE ARE CAMERAS EVERYWHERE THAT FEELING WOULD CHANGE. YOU DON'T
KNOW WHO
02:18:51.000 --> 02:18:54.000
IS WATCHING, YOU DON'T KNOW HOW LONG VIDEO IS SAVED, YOU DON'T KNOW WHERE IT
02:18:54.000 --> 02:18:57.000
ENDS UP. SO YOU START ACTING DIFFERENT EVEN IF YOU DID NOTHING WRONG. YOU DON'T
02:18:57.000 --> 02:19:00.000
SAY AS LONG, YOU DON'T JOKE AROUND AS MUCH, YOU DON'T ACT GOOFY WITH YOUR 02:19:00.000 --> 02:19:03.000
FRIENDS. YOU THINK TWICE BEFORE BEING YOURSELF.
02:19:03.000 --> 02:19:09.000
LIKE YOU'RE ALWAYS BEING RATED IN PUBLIC.
02:19:09.000 --> 02:19:13.000
TEENAGERS AND PLACES WHERE WE CAN EXIST WITHOUT FEELING RECORDED ALL THE TIME.
02:19:13.000 --> 02:19:16.000
IT'S PART OF GROWING UP. YOU LEARN CONFIDENCE BY MAKING SMALL MISTAKES IN 02:19:16.000 --> 02:19:19.000
HARMLESS SITUATIONS. IF EVERY NORMAL MOMENT FEELS WATCHED, PEOPLE STOPPED TRYING
02:19:19.000 --> 02:19:23.000
THINGS, STOP TALKING FREELY AND JUST GO HOME.
02:19:23.000 --> 02:19:28.000
I UNDERSTAND THAT CAMERAS CAN BE HELPFUL SOMETIMES. I'M NOT AGAINST
SAFETY, BUT
02:19:28.000 --> 02:19:32.000
WITH THE CURRENT ORDINANCE AT LEAST MAKES THE POLICE STOP AND TALK WITH THE
02:19:32.000 --> 02:19:37.000
PUBLIC BEFORE SURVEILLANCE GROWS. THAT MATTERS. IT MEANS THE COMMUNITY
GETS TO
02:19:37.000 --> 02:19:41.000
DECIDE WHAT KIND OF TOWN THIS IS. FROM MY POINT OF VIEW A SAFE TOWN IS
NOT ONLY
02:19:41.000 --> 02:19:45.000
A PLACE WITH LESS CRIME, IT'S A PLACE WHERE YOUNG PEOPLE CAN FEEL
COMFORTABLE
02:19:45.000 --> 02:19:48.000
ABOUT BEING OUTSIDE AND BEING THEMSELVES. PLEASE DON'T MAKE IT EASIER TO ADD
02:19:48.000 --> 02:19:52.000
MORE SURVEILLANCE WITHOUT THAT CONVERSATION. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING. 02:19:52.000 --> 02:19:57.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT I WILL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS.
02:19:57.000 --> 02:20:00.000
SEEING NONE I WILL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? 02:20:00.000 --> 02:20:06.000
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
02:20:06.000 --> 02:20:09.000
I'M JUST TUNING INTO THIS ISSUE, I LOOKED AT THE SLIDES AND I HAVE TO
SAY, THE
02:20:09.000 --> 02:20:15.000
SLIDES DIDN'T SEEM TO REFLECT AT ALL WHAT MOST PEOPLE SEEM TO BE CONFUSED ABOUT.
02:20:15.000 --> 02:20:19.000
I HAVE A HARD TIME BELIEVING THAT THE ORDINANCE WOULD PREVENT A PRIVATE
CITIZEN
02:20:19.000 --> 02:20:23.000
FROM HANDING OVER EVIDENCE OF A CRIME AND THE POLICE NOT BEING ABLE TO
USE THAT
02:20:23.000 --> 02:20:29.000
IF IT HAS THE PERMISSION OF THE OWNER.
02:20:29.000 --> 02:20:32.000
YOU HAVE TO ESTABLISH WHETHER THAT IS REALLY TRUE OR NOT, AND I DON'T
WANT TO
02:20:32.000 --> 02:20:38.000
JUST BELIEVE THE WORD OF THE POLICE OR BELIEVE THE WORD OF THE 02:20:38.000 --> 02:20:42.000
AUTHOR OF THE ORDINANCE, I WANT LEGAL HELP IN DETERMINING THAT. YOU DON'T WANT
02:20:42.000 --> 02:20:48.000
TO MAKE CHANGES LIKE THIS IN A PUBLIC FORUM
02:20:48.000 --> 02:20:52.000
FOR COMPLICATED TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES WITHOUT A DEEP DIVE AND
UNDERSTANDING
02:20:52.000 --> 02:20:55.000
WHAT'S GOING ON. IT MAY SOUND LIKE AN EASY THING, WE WANT TO UPGRADE OUR
CAMERAS
02:20:55.000 --> 02:21:04.000
WITHOUT LETTING THE CITY COUNCIL NO.
02:21:04.000 --> 02:21:08.000
BUT WAITING A WHILE AND SAYING WE'RE UPDATING OUR CAMERAS AND WE'RE DOING THIS
02:21:08.000 --> 02:21:11.000
AND WE'RE DOING THAT AND IT TAKES A MONTH OR TWO TO DO, DOESN'T SEEM LIKE A BAD
02:21:11.000 --> 02:21:16.000
PROBLEM, TO ME. THE BIG PROBLEM
02:21:16.000 --> 02:21:19.000
IS SOLVING CRIMES AND BEING ABLE TO USE THE EVIDENCE IN CRIME WITH THE 02:21:19.000 --> 02:21:23.000
PERMISSION OF THE CAMERA OWNERS. THAT REALLY HAS TO BE ESTABLISHED IN FACT,
02:21:23.000 --> 02:21:26.000
WHETHER THAT'S TRUE OR NOT. I HAVE A HARD TIME BELIEVING THAT WE CAN'T DO THAT.
02:21:26.000 --> 02:21:33.000
WE ALSO COULD IMAGINE
02:21:33.000 --> 02:21:36.000
, THIS IS DYSTOPIAN, BUT IF A SHOP OWNER WANTS TO GIVE CONTINUOUS
COVERAGE TO
02:21:36.000 --> 02:21:41.000
THE POLICE AND THEY REQUEST WE WANT YOUR COVERAGE, AND THE SHOP OWNER
SAYS FINE,
02:21:41.000 --> 02:21:46.000
YOU CAN HAVE A 24/7, I DON'T THINK THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO THAT WITHOUT US
02:21:46.000 --> 02:21:49.000
KNOWING THAT THAT'S GOING ON. ONCE YOU START RECORDING THINGS AND SAVING THEM
02:21:49.000 --> 02:21:54.000
THERE'S ABUSES THAT CAN HAPPEN. I RECOMMEND
02:21:54.000 --> 02:21:58.000
NOT DOING ANYTHING WITH THIS ORDINANCE UNTIL YOU REALLY GET SOME BASIC FACTS
02:21:58.000 --> 02:22:03.000
TARGET THEM ON WHAT THE PROBLEM IS THAT WE CAN ALL AGREE ON, 02:22:03.000 --> 02:22:07.000
AND MAKE A MINOR CHANGE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
02:22:07.000 --> 02:22:10.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT I WILL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS.
02:22:10.000 --> 02:22:16.000
SEEING NONE I WILL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM.
02:22:16.000 --> 02:22:19.000
IF THERE'S ANYONE ON ZOOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
02:22:19.000 --> 02:22:22.000
PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND
02:22:22.000 --> 02:22:28.000
VIRTUALLY. SEEING NONE, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED ON THIS ITEM. 02:22:28.000 --> 02:22:31.000
>> THANK YOU, MARY. WE'RE BACK AT THE DAY IS HERE, AND NOW I'M JUST
INTERESTED
02:22:31.000 --> 02:22:34.000
IN SEEING IF ANYONE HAS ANY COMMENTS THEY'D LIKE TO MAKE. VICE MAYOR. 02:22:34.000 --> 02:22:39.000
>> I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY SOMETHING. SO,
02:22:39.000 --> 02:22:45.000
THESE EDITS, DO THEY
02:22:45.000 --> 02:22:47.000
ALLOW THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO ADD, OR THE CITY TO ADD NEW CAMERAS IN NEW 02:22:47.000 --> 02:22:50.000
LOCATIONS, OR ARE WE TALKING JUST ABOUT
02:22:50.000 --> 02:22:57.000
UPDATING THE CURRENT CAMERAS?
02:22:57.000 --> 02:23:04.000
>> THEY DO NOT. THIS DOES NOT APPLY
02:23:04.000 --> 02:23:06.000
IN SECTION C, ADDING LANGUAGE TO SAY THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO TRADITIONAL 02:23:06.000 --> 02:23:12.000
SECURITY CAMERAS EXCEPT FOR THE USE
02:23:12.000 --> 02:23:21.000
OF SECURITY CAMERAS OWNED BY THE CITY IN A NEW LOCATION. 02:23:21.000 --> 02:23:27.000
>> SO RIGHT NOW, YOU NEED THE COUNCIL'S APPROVAL
02:23:27.000 --> 02:23:32.000
FOR THE USE, USING A NEW OR EXISTING SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. IT DOESN'T SAY
02:23:32.000 --> 02:23:35.000
OWNED BY THE CITY. IT JUST SAYS USING A NEW OR EXISTING SURVEILLANCE
TECHNOLOGY
02:23:35.000 --> 02:23:39.000
REGARDLESS OF ITS OWNERSHIP.
02:23:39.000 --> 02:23:41.000
FOR A PURPOSE IN A MANNER AND LOCATION NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE CITY
02:23:41.000 --> 02:23:47.000
COUNCIL IN A LOCATION WITH THIS CHAPTER.
02:23:47.000 --> 02:23:52.000
WITH THEIR CURRENT ORDINANCE, ANY NEW LOCATION PUBLICLY OR PRIVATELY OWNED
02:23:52.000 --> 02:23:55.000
NEEDS COUNCIL APPROVAL. THE ADDITION WOULD SAY THIS DOESN'T APPLY TO
TRADITIONAL
02:23:55.000 --> 02:23:59.000
SECURITY CAMERAS.
02:23:59.000 --> 02:24:02.000
EXCEPT FOR THE USE OF TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS OWNED BY THE CITY IN A NEW
02:24:02.000 --> 02:24:06.000
LOCATION.
02:24:06.000 --> 02:24:09.000
YOU WOULD CONTINUE TO NEED COUNCIL APPROVAL TO INSTALL CITY-OWNED CAMERAS IN A
02:24:09.000 --> 02:24:12.000
NEW LOCATION.
02:24:12.000 --> 02:24:15.000
>> THIS DOESN'T ADD A BUNCH OF CAMERAS. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE POLICE 02:24:15.000 --> 02:24:19.000
DEPARTMENT OR THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY.
02:24:19.000 --> 02:24:22.000
>> CORRECT. THANK YOU.
02:24:22.000 --> 02:24:29.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER CARTER?
02:24:29.000 --> 02:24:34.000
>> JUST, ALSO L.A. SOME FEARS, I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS 02:24:34.000 --> 02:24:40.000
PER USE AND BY WARRANT ONLY TO ACCESS THESE. THIS DOESN'T HAVE ANY KIND OF
02:24:40.000 --> 02:24:42.000
LOOPHOLE OR OPENNESS FOR ONGOING SURVEILLANCE WERE ANY KIND OF UNWANTED 02:24:42.000 --> 02:24:47.000
EXPOSURE.
02:24:47.000 --> 02:24:52.000
>> I WOULD, A WARRANT IS STILL REQUIRED FOR THE CITY
02:24:52.000 --> 02:24:57.000
IN THE SAME CIRCUMSTANCES A WARRANT WOULD BE REQUIRED NOW. THIS DOES NOT CHANGE
02:24:57.000 --> 02:25:03.000
ANY OF THAT. AND COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION WOULD STILL NEED TO BE 02:25:03.000 --> 02:25:09.000
REQUIRED FOR ANY ONGOING ARRANGEMENT TO ACCESS PRIVATE PROPERTY. 24/7 ACCESS
02:25:09.000 --> 02:25:14.000
TO A PRIVATE SECURITY CAMERA WOULD STILL REQUIRE COUNCIL APPROVAL. THAT'S AN
02:25:14.000 --> 02:25:19.000
ONGOING ARRANGEMENT. ONE THING I WOULD, IN
02:25:19.000 --> 02:25:24.000
I HEARD SOMEONE MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT
02:25:24.000 --> 02:25:30.000
SHARING THIS OUTWARD, NOT JUST SHARING IT INWARD. WE COULD ADD, NOT THE INTENT
02:25:30.000 --> 02:25:36.000
OF SECTION E TO ALLOW THE CITY TO
02:25:36.000 --> 02:25:40.000
SHARE FORWARD WITH THIRD PARTIES, WE COULD ADD HERE THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE THE
02:25:40.000 --> 02:25:46.000
CITY USING TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS FOR SPECIFIC INSTANCE OR EVENT TO MAKE
02:25:46.000 --> 02:25:49.000
CLEAR THAT THE INTENT IS NOT TO ALLOW THE CITY TO SHARE OUTWARD. 02:25:49.000 --> 02:25:56.000
TO SHARE WITH THE CITY.
02:25:56.000 --> 02:25:59.000
>> IS THAT DEFINED AS OTHER POLICE DEPARTMENTS? BECAUSE, THERE'S ALL THAT 02:25:59.000 --> 02:26:01.000
MUTUAL HELP
02:26:01.000 --> 02:26:06.000
?
02:26:06.000 --> 02:26:09.000
>> THIRD PARTY WOULD BE ANYONE BESIDES THE CITY. COULDN'T THAT HINDER THE 02:26:09.000 --> 02:26:16.000
PROCESS?
02:26:16.000 --> 02:26:18.000
>> I DON'T WANT TO SAY IT NEVER WOULD, BUT, WE COULD MAKE A LIST OF PEOPLE
02:26:18.000 --> 02:26:22.000
THINGS COULD BE SHARED WITH, BUT,
02:26:22.000 --> 02:26:27.000
NO ONE BESIDES
02:26:27.000 --> 02:26:30.000
THE CITY.
02:26:30.000 --> 02:26:35.000
>> IF THE SHERIFF, IF OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT WAS WORKING WITH THE SHERIFF, 02:26:35.000 --> 02:26:39.000
BECAUSE WE'RE SURROUNDED BY COUNTY, THEN THEY COULDN'T SHARE ANYTHING? 02:26:39.000 --> 02:26:43.000
>> THE CITY COULDN'T, THEY, THE SHERIFF COULD GET THE CAMERA 02:26:43.000 --> 02:26:46.000
FOOTAGE IF IT WAS PRIVATE CAMERA FOOTAGE DIRECTLY FROM THE PRIVATE PARTY, 02:26:46.000 --> 02:26:51.000
THEY'RE NOT SUBJECT TO OUR ORDINANCE.
02:26:51.000 --> 02:26:59.000
>> BUT IF A CITIZEN VOLUNTARILY SHARES THAT INFORMATION, 02:26:59.000 --> 02:27:02.000
COULD THEY THEN, COULD THE POLICE DEPARTMENT THEN SHARE IT? OR THEY WOULD BE
02:27:02.000 --> 02:27:04.000
PERMITTED FROM SHARING IT AT THAT POINT?
02:27:04.000 --> 02:27:08.000
>> THEY WOULD BE PROHIBITED FROM SHARING IT. THE SHERIFF COULD GET IT
DIRECTLY
02:27:08.000 --> 02:27:12.000
FROM THE INDIVIDUAL. GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN.
02:27:12.000 --> 02:27:18.000
>> I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS PUBLIC HEARING BUT I WANT TO MAKE CLEAR THAT I
02:27:18.000 --> 02:27:26.000
OPPOSE THE INTRODUCTION OF THIS AMENDED ORDINANCE. FOR THE PRIVACY
REASONS
02:27:26.000 --> 02:27:29.000
AND FOR THE FACT THAT FROM MY PERSPECTIVE IT DOES STRIP THE CITY COUNCIL OF
02:27:29.000 --> 02:27:32.000
APPROVING ANY SURVEILLANCE AND IN THIS DAY AND AGE WITH OUR CURRENT
FEDERAL
02:27:32.000 --> 02:27:37.000
ADMINISTRATION AND THE TERROR THAT THEY'RE ASSERTING,
02:27:37.000 --> 02:27:40.000
I DEFINITELY OPPOSE ANY TYPE OF INTRODUCTION TO CONSIDER THIS TYPE OF 02:27:40.000 --> 02:27:42.000
SURVEILLANCE.
02:27:42.000 --> 02:27:48.000
>> I HAVE A QUESTION, TOO.
02:27:48.000 --> 02:27:52.000
>> THE REASON FOR THIS WAS FOR THE REASON THAT SOME OF THESE OTHER 02:27:52.000 --> 02:27:58.000
COUNCILMEMBERS SAID, SO THAT THE POLICE COULD USE THE PRIVATE, THE THINGS. IT
02:27:58.000 --> 02:28:04.000
DOESN'T EXTEND ANY OTHER CAPABILITY, THIS PRETTY MUCH JUST ALLOWS 02:28:04.000 --> 02:28:10.000
POLICE TO DO THEIR JOB AND BE ABLE TO ACCESS, WARRANT THESE. 02:28:10.000 --> 02:28:15.000
>> THERE IS THE SECOND PART WHERE THE CITY COULD UPGRADE ITS CAMERA
SYSTEMS,
02:28:15.000 --> 02:28:18.000
WITH, AS LONG AS THEY CONTINUE TO ONLY CAPTURE
02:28:18.000 --> 02:28:25.000
AUDIO AND VISUAL.
02:28:25.000 --> 02:28:28.000
SO CITY COULD REPLACE AT CITY HALL, WE HAVE SECURITY CAMERAS, THOSE COULD BE
02:28:28.000 --> 02:28:31.000
REPLACED AS LONG AS THE NEW SECURITY CAMERAS ONLY CAPTURE AUDIO AND VIDEO AND
02:28:31.000 --> 02:28:38.000
NOT ANY OF THESE OTHER HEIGHTENED TECHNOLOGIES.
02:28:38.000 --> 02:28:42.000
THERE IS A SECOND ASPECT NOT RELATED TO PRIVATE SECURITY CAMERAS. 02:28:42.000 --> 02:28:46.000
>> GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER HINTON.
02:28:46.000 --> 02:28:51.000
>> TO FOLLOW UP ON THAT QUESTION, IT WAS INDICATED THAT WE ONLY HAVE LIVE 02:28:51.000 --> 02:28:54.000
CAMERAS RIGHT NOW. SO, WE WOULD WITHIN THIS ORDINANCE BE ABLE TO REPLACE THOSE
02:28:54.000 --> 02:28:58.000
WITH A RECORDING CAMERA.
02:28:58.000 --> 02:29:03.000
>> CORRECT. AND TO CLARIFY, THERE ARE SOME AREAS WHERE WE HAVE RECORDING
CAMERAS
02:29:03.000 --> 02:29:08.000
BUT SOME AREAS WHERE WE ONLY HAVE LIVE CAMERAS. THOSE LIVE CAMERAS COULD BE
02:29:08.000 --> 02:29:12.000
UPDATED TO RECORDING CAMERAS, AFTER THESE CHANGES WITHOUT HAVING TO GO 02:29:12.000 --> 02:29:16.000
THROUGH THE OTHER PROCESS.
02:29:16.000 --> 02:29:19.000
>> BUT RIGHT NOW, WE CAN'T UPDATE THOSE CAMERAS THAT ARE LIVE ONLY TO BE 02:29:19.000 --> 02:29:22.000
RECORDING CAMERAS?
02:29:22.000 --> 02:29:25.000
>> WE CAN, THERE'S A PROCESS IN THE ORDINANCE WHERE IT'S MULTI STEP
PROCESS, TO
02:29:25.000 --> 02:29:30.000
HAVE
02:29:30.000 --> 02:29:33.000
TO COME TO THE COUNCIL,
02:29:33.000 --> 02:29:37.000
FOR THAT TO HAPPEN.
02:29:37.000 --> 02:29:40.000
>> SO THIS WOULD MAKE US AUTOMATIC THAT COULD HAPPEN? WITH DISCRETION BY STAFF?
02:29:40.000 --> 02:29:44.000
A SPEAKER BROUGHT UP
02:29:44.000 --> 02:29:50.000
FILMING ON OUR CELL PHONES.
02:29:50.000 --> 02:29:53.000
WHICH, DOES THIS COVER ANY OF THAT, OR SHOULDN'T IT?
02:29:53.000 --> 02:29:59.000
>> TRADITIONAL CAMERAS ARE DEFINED AS ANYTHING THAT CAPTURES VIDEO AND AUDIO
02:29:59.000 --> 02:30:06.000
ONLY. SO A DASH CAM CAMERA THAT ONLY CAPTURED THAT, A CELL PHONE CAPTURE AND
02:30:06.000 --> 02:30:12.000
AUDIO, IF I'M SURE IN THE FUTURE CELL PHONES MIGHT HAVE SOME OTHER
THINGS,
02:30:12.000 --> 02:30:15.000
THE CITY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO USE ANY OF THAT TYPE OF VIDEO FOOTAGE. AT THE
02:30:15.000 --> 02:30:18.000
NORMAL CELL PHONE VIDEO,
02:30:18.000 --> 02:30:25.000
YES.
02:30:25.000 --> 02:30:30.000
>> I HAVE A QUESTION I WANT TO ASK. WE ALREADY HAVE IN OUR ORDINANCE, 02:30:30.000 --> 02:30:35.000
WHICH PROHIBITS CERTAIN SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGIES,
02:30:35.000 --> 02:30:40.000
IT SHOULD BE UNLAWFUL TO RETAIN ACCESS USED
02:30:40.000 --> 02:30:42.000
TO BIOMETRICS, PREDICTIVE POLICING, THAT STILL STANDS. WE'RE HEARING A LOT OF
02:30:42.000 --> 02:30:48.000
DIFFERENT
02:30:48.000 --> 02:30:51.000
HEIGHTENED CONCERNS, BUT, THIS STILL STANDS, IT'S IN OUR ORDINANCE. 02:30:51.000 --> 02:30:56.000
I TOOK A SCREENSHOT OF IT. ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM BIOMETRIC 02:30:56.000 --> 02:31:01.000
SURVEILLANCE, IT LISTS THESE THINGS WE CAN'T DO, WE'RE NOT CHANGING ANY OF THAT.
02:31:01.000 --> 02:31:03.000
>> AND THE DEFINITION OF TRADITIONAL CAMERA, I TRIED TO BE VERY SPECIFIC BUT IT
02:31:03.000 --> 02:31:06.000
IS NOT INCLUDE CAMERAS THAT DO ANY OF THAT.
02:31:06.000 --> 02:31:11.000
>> SO, YOU'RE STATING
02:31:11.000 --> 02:31:17.000
BASICALLY THAT WE ARE JUST CHANGING THIS, BECAUSE WE'VE HEARD A FEW
PEOPLE WHO
02:31:17.000 --> 02:31:19.000
ARE AUTHORS OF THIS SAYING, IT WAS THEIR UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS DIDN'T COVER
02:31:19.000 --> 02:31:24.000
THESE CAMERAS. BUT
02:31:24.000 --> 02:31:29.000
THINGS EVOLVE, I FIND DIFFERENT ATTORNEYS HAVE DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS. 02:31:29.000 --> 02:31:32.000
I'VE FOUND SINCE I'VE SAT HERE FOR FOUR YEARS THAT WE FOUND OTHER THINGS THAT
02:31:32.000 --> 02:31:35.000
WEREN'T EXACTLY WHAT WE THOUGHT THEY WOULD BE. THIS IS NO DIFFERENT.
WE'RE
02:31:35.000 --> 02:31:40.000
TRYING TO TIGHTEN THINGS UP AND MAKE IT
02:31:40.000 --> 02:31:44.000
RELEVANT TO THE CITY AND MAKING IT POSSIBLE TO PROTECT
02:31:44.000 --> 02:31:48.000
OUR RESIDENTS WITH THEIR OWN VIDEOS.
02:31:48.000 --> 02:31:55.000
THAT'S ALL WE'RE LOOKING TO DO WITH THESE PRIVATE CAMERAS. 02:31:55.000 --> 02:31:57.000
I MEAN, I'M TRYING TO REITERATE. IN MY MIND I'M LISTENING TO THESE
STATEMENTS
02:31:57.000 --> 02:32:00.000
THAT PEOPLE ARE MAKING.
02:32:00.000 --> 02:32:03.000
>> THAT IS WHAT OUR INTENT IS PLUS THE UPDATING OF THE CITY-OWNED CAMERAS. WE
02:32:03.000 --> 02:32:07.000
TRY TO ANTICIPATE SOME OF THESE CONCERNS
02:32:07.000 --> 02:32:12.000
, THAT'S WHY WE TRIED TO DEFINE TRADITIONAL CAMERA CLOSELY 02:32:12.000 --> 02:32:16.000
TO SPECIFY NEW CITY CAMERAS AND NEW LOCATIONS REQUIRES THAT. 02:32:16.000 --> 02:32:23.000
ONGOING ARRANGEMENTS WITH
02:32:23.000 --> 02:32:31.000
A PRIVATE PARTY REQUIRE COUNCIL APPROVAL. TRY TO ADDRESS AND ANTICIPATE 02:32:31.000 --> 02:32:34.000
AS MANY OF THESE CONCERNS AS POSSIBLE TO EMPHASIZE THIS HAD A NARROW PURPOSE.
02:32:34.000 --> 02:32:39.000
>> GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER CARTER.
02:32:39.000 --> 02:32:44.000
>> I WAS WONDERING IF WE COULD SPLIT THIS, TO ENABLE
02:32:44.000 --> 02:32:51.000
THE POLICE TO USE RECORDED VIDEO OF PRIVATE CITIZENS.
02:32:51.000 --> 02:32:54.000
AND RIVIERA RATE, THAT WASN'T POSSIBLE BEFORE, WE'VE TRIED TO GO THROUGH THIS
02:32:54.000 --> 02:32:59.000
AND THIS LANGUAGE MAKES THAT MORE CAPABLE.
02:32:59.000 --> 02:33:06.000
BUT TO SPLIT THIS BETWEEN THAT AND THE UPGRADING OF THE CAMERAS, BECAUSE 02:33:06.000 --> 02:33:09.000
THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT I'M INTERESTED IN. OFFERING, 02:33:09.000 --> 02:33:14.000
A HYBRID.
02:33:14.000 --> 02:33:17.000
>> CERTAINLY IF THAT'S THE DIRECTION FROM THE COUNCIL.
02:33:17.000 --> 02:33:24.000
>> VICE MAYOR?
02:33:24.000 --> 02:33:28.000
>> YES, COULD YOU EXPLAIN WHERE EXACTLY IN THIS ORDINANCE, WHERE IS THE
WORDING
02:33:28.000 --> 02:33:31.000
THAT RESTRICTS THE POLICE FROM ACCESSING
02:33:31.000 --> 02:33:42.000
PRIVATE CAMERAS?
02:33:42.000 --> 02:33:46.000
>> RIGHT NOW, IN SECTION C, CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE THE CITY
02:33:46.000 --> 02:33:50.000
FOR USING A NEW OR EXISTING SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY.
02:33:50.000 --> 02:33:55.000
>> I'M SORRY. SECTION --
02:33:55.000 --> 02:34:00.000
>> IN SECTION SO, 8.80
02:34:00.000 --> 02:34:05.000
>> PAGE FIVE OF SIX.
02:34:05.000 --> 02:34:10.000
>> OUR EXISTING ORDINANCE SAYS THE CITY DEPARTMENT MUST OBTAIN CITY
COUNCIL
02:34:10.000 --> 02:34:16.000
APPROVAL PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING.
02:34:16.000 --> 02:34:19.000
C IS USING A NEW OR EXISTING SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. IT DOESN'T SAY
OWNED BY
02:34:19.000 --> 02:34:23.000
THE CITY. IT JUST SAYS
02:34:23.000 --> 02:34:32.000
USING A NEW OR EXISTING SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY.
02:34:32.000 --> 02:34:36.000
>> SO,
02:34:36.000 --> 02:34:42.000
IF WE WERE TO DO A MINIMUM
02:34:42.000 --> 02:34:47.000
, COULD WE JUST MAKE THAT CHANGE AND NOT DO THE CHANGE
02:34:47.000 --> 02:34:51.000
?
02:34:51.000 --> 02:34:57.000
WOULD THAT FIX THE PROBLEM?
02:34:57.000 --> 02:35:06.000
>> SO, WE COULD TAKE IT OUT FROM A,
02:35:06.000 --> 02:35:10.000
AND B, THAT WOULD STILL REQUIRE COUNCIL APPROVAL, IF WE TOOK IT OUT OF
CAPITAL
02:35:10.000 --> 02:35:12.000
A AND B, THAT WOULD ELIMINATE THE CHANGE
02:35:12.000 --> 02:35:18.000
TO UPGRADING CITY CAMERAS.
02:35:18.000 --> 02:35:21.000
ANY TYPE OF UPGRADING CITY CAMERAS WOULD STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE
EXISTING
02:35:21.000 --> 02:35:27.000
PROCESS AND COME TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
02:35:27.000 --> 02:35:31.000
IF WE TOOK THIS OUT OF D,
02:35:31.000 --> 02:35:34.000
WHEN SOMEONE GIVES YOU
02:35:34.000 --> 02:35:43.000
THE SECURITY FOOTAGE,
02:35:43.000 --> 02:35:45.000
DEPENDING ON SITUATIONS, AN ORAL AGREEMENT THAT YOU'RE GIVING SOMEONE.
SO, WE
02:35:45.000 --> 02:35:52.000
PUT IN HERE
02:35:52.000 --> 02:35:56.000
, NOT PART OF ANY ONGOING CITY ENTITY. IF YOU WANTED TO GET RID OF THE
PORTION
02:35:56.000 --> 02:36:04.000
THAT ALLOWED THE UPGRADING OF THE CITY CAMERAS,
02:36:04.000 --> 02:36:07.000
YOU COULD ELIMINATE THE CHANGES TO A AND B AND KEEP THE CHANGES TO C AND D.
02:36:07.000 --> 02:36:13.000
>> I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THAT MOTION. THAT DOES THAT.
02:36:13.000 --> 02:36:21.000
THAT ALLOWS THE POLICE TO USE EXISTING THINGS
02:36:21.000 --> 02:36:23.000
. I'M SORRY? I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT IS THAT HYBRID. THAT
ENABLES THE
02:36:23.000 --> 02:36:30.000
POLICE
02:36:30.000 --> 02:36:36.000
TO USE PRIVATE CAMERAS TO BE ABLE TO SOLVE THINGS. BUT, NOT, BUT STILL 02:36:36.000 --> 02:36:42.000
REQUIRE, LEAVE OFF THE PARTS OF THE COUNCIL
02:36:42.000 --> 02:36:45.000
INDEPENDENTLY REVIEWS WHETHER WE UPGRADE THOSE OTHER CAMERAS OR NOT. SO WE CAN
02:36:45.000 --> 02:36:51.000
MORE CAREFULLY THINK ABOUT IT.
02:36:51.000 --> 02:36:54.000
>> CAN SOMEONE HELP ME UNDERSTAND? I'M NOT FOLLOWING WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, I'M
02:36:54.000 --> 02:36:58.000
SORRY.
02:36:58.000 --> 02:37:02.000
>> I BELIEVE WHAT COUNCILMEMBER CARTER WAS SAYING IS, THERE'S PROPOSED
CHANGES
02:37:02.000 --> 02:37:10.000
IN SECTION 8.8 0.030
02:37:10.000 --> 02:37:16.000
PROPOSED CHANGES TO SUBSECTIONS A, B, C, AND D.
02:37:16.000 --> 02:37:20.000
IS PROPOSING TO NOT MAKE THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO CAPITAL A AND B WHICH WOULD
02:37:20.000 --> 02:37:26.000
STILL FACILITATE THE USE OF THE PRIVATE CAMERAS, BUT WOULD NOT ALLOW THE CITY
02:37:26.000 --> 02:37:39.000
TO UPGRADE WITHOUT GIVING COUNCIL APPROVAL.
02:37:39.000 --> 02:37:50.000
>> CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY WE WOULD NEED D, WHY DO WE NEED THAT? 02:37:50.000 --> 02:37:54.000
>> SO, SOMEONE
02:37:54.000 --> 02:38:00.000
, PRIVATE ENTITY SHARING THEIR CAMERA WITH YOU, IT SAYS ENTERING INTO AN 02:38:00.000 --> 02:38:06.000
AGREEMENT INCLUDING EITHER A WRITTEN OR ORAL AGREEMENT WITH A NON-CITY
ENTITY TO
02:38:06.000 --> 02:38:11.000
OTHERWISE USE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. SO,
02:38:11.000 --> 02:38:19.000
ORAL AGREEMENT IS PRETTY BROAD, IF SOMEONE GIVES.
02:38:19.000 --> 02:38:23.000
>> I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED IS THAT WE DON'T WANT
TO GIVE
02:38:23.000 --> 02:38:29.000
THE AUTHORITY TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO JUST CHANGE OUT CAMERAS THAT MIGHT
02:38:29.000 --> 02:38:33.000
NEED TO BE CHANGED OUT? WE'RE AFRAID OF THAT? I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND. 02:38:33.000 --> 02:38:45.000
>> I BELIEVE THAT IS THE RECOMMENDATION.
02:38:45.000 --> 02:38:50.000
>> OKAY. REMOVING IT FROM A AND B, WOULD BE THAT, BUT, THEN THAT FOR SURE WOULD
02:38:50.000 --> 02:39:00.000
ALLOW. OKAY.
02:39:00.000 --> 02:39:03.000
>> HOW MANY CAMERAS ARE THE OLD SCHOOL THAT PROBABLY, IF WE APPROVE IT 02:39:03.000 --> 02:39:08.000
THE WAY IT'S BEING DISCUSSED RIGHT NOW, POLICE DEPARTMENT WOULD COME
BACK, I
02:39:08.000 --> 02:39:12.000
WOULD ASSUME WITH THE REQUEST TO CHANGE OUT CAMERAS? HOW MANY ARE OLD
VERSUS HOW
02:39:12.000 --> 02:39:22.000
MANY RECORD? DO WE KNOW? CHIEF,
02:39:22.000 --> 02:39:25.000
>> LET ME KNOW IF I'M CORRECT OR WRONG, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. MY
UNDERSTANDING IS
02:39:25.000 --> 02:39:28.000
THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IS JUST A LIVE FEED, THERE IS NO RECORDING. CITY
HALL DOES
02:39:28.000 --> 02:39:34.000
RECORD,
02:39:34.000 --> 02:39:41.000
I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S AUDIO. IS IT AUDIO OR JUST VISUAL? 02:39:41.000 --> 02:39:51.000
CITY HALL IS JUST RECORDING VISUAL, NO AUDIO. PUBLIC WORKS IS VISUAL. AS WELL.
02:39:51.000 --> 02:39:53.000
>> AND WE HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE, WE HAVEN'T PROSECUTED GRAFFITI ON CITY HALL, FOR
02:39:53.000 --> 02:40:00.000
EXAMPLE. EVEN WITH THE RECORDING, BECAUSE
02:40:00.000 --> 02:40:13.000
, OF THIS ORDINANCE, FROM LEGAL COUNCIL. WE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO DO THAT. OKAY.
02:40:13.000 --> 02:40:15.000
BUT WITH THIS NEW ORDINANCE, THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WOULD COME BACK TO US IF
02:40:15.000 --> 02:40:20.000
THEY WANTED TO CHANGE OTHER CAMERAS.
02:40:20.000 --> 02:40:23.000
THE WAY WE'RE BEING PROPOSED NOW. I WANT TO BE CLEAR ON WHAT WE'RE AGREEING TO.
02:40:23.000 --> 02:40:27.000
>> THE WAY OF BEING PROPOSED NOW,
02:40:27.000 --> 02:40:30.000
POLICE DEPARTMENT WOULD NOT NEED TO COME BACK TO THE CHANGE OTHER CAMERAS.
02:40:30.000 --> 02:40:32.000
>> I MEANT ON THE FLOOR.
02:40:32.000 --> 02:40:36.000
>> CORRECT.
02:40:36.000 --> 02:40:39.000
>> UNOFFICIAL REQUEST.
02:40:39.000 --> 02:40:42.000
OKAY.
02:40:42.000 --> 02:40:47.000
>> THAT'S CORRECT. SORRY FOR MY CONFUSION.
02:40:47.000 --> 02:40:54.000
>> THE POLICE CHIEF COULD COME BACK WITH US WITH ANOTHER AGENDA ITEM AND SAY,
02:40:54.000 --> 02:41:03.000
NOW WE WANT THEM LIVE INSTEAD OF, RECORDED INSTEAD OF LIVE. OKAY.
UNDERSTOOD.
02:41:03.000 --> 02:41:13.000
>> MY THOUGHT IS, WE'VE INFORMED EVERYONE OUT THERE HOW ALL OF OUR
SECURITY
02:41:13.000 --> 02:41:18.000
SURVEILLANCE WORKS. OKAY. OKAY. I DON'T KNOW. WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR.
02:41:18.000 --> 02:41:25.000
I DON'T KNOW, IS THERE A SECOND?
02:41:25.000 --> 02:41:28.000
OKAY.
02:41:28.000 --> 02:41:31.000
>> I'LL SECOND THAT EMOTION.
02:41:31.000 --> 02:41:40.000
>> COULD SOMEBODY RESTATE THE MOTION? THEY ARE NOT CLEAR. 02:41:40.000 --> 02:41:45.000
>> SO, THE MOTION IS TO INTRODUCE IN THE FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE,
TO MEND
02:41:45.000 --> 02:41:56.000
SEBASTOPOL MUNICIPAL CODE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNITY SAFETY
ORDINANCE
02:41:56.000 --> 02:42:05.000
OF SEBASTOPOL MUNICIPAL CODE, EXCLUDING TWO CHANGES 8.8 0.03 0A AND B. 02:42:05.000 --> 02:42:12.000
>> THAT'S WHAT IT IS.
02:42:12.000 --> 02:42:21.000
>> GO AHEAD. FURTHER DISCUSSION?
02:42:21.000 --> 02:42:24.000
>> I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY THAT I WON'T SUPPORT IT THAT WAY. I WOULD LIKE TO
02:42:24.000 --> 02:42:27.000
TAKE THE ADVICE OF OUR ATTORNEY. HE'S TOLD US OVER AND OVER AGAIN DESPITE MANY
02:42:27.000 --> 02:42:32.000
PEOPLE WHO DON'T EVEN LIVE IN OUR CITY AND EVERYWHERE ELSE TELLING US
THAT WE
02:42:32.000 --> 02:42:36.000
SHOULDN'T BE DOING THIS. BUT I PERSONALLY DON'T SEE A PROBLEM WITH THE
CHANGES
02:42:36.000 --> 02:42:40.000
THAT ARE MADE. I'M IN SUPPORT OF WHAT IS RECOMMENDED BY THE STAFF. I
WON'T BE
02:42:40.000 --> 02:42:45.000
SUPPORTING THE MOTION. I JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO SAY WHY. 02:42:45.000 --> 02:42:53.000
>> I'M SORRY?
02:42:53.000 --> 02:42:56.000
SHE CAN DO THE VOTE COUNT. I JUST WANTED TO BE ABLE TO SAY WHY I'M VOTING THE
02:42:56.000 --> 02:42:58.000
WAY I'M VOTING.
02:42:58.000 --> 02:43:05.000
>> OKAY.
02:43:05.000 --> 02:43:09.000
I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS FAIR BUT I'M TRYING TO GET TO A YES SO, I HOPE THAT
02:43:09.000 --> 02:43:12.000
THIS DOES COME BACK BECAUSE I WOULD LIKE TO UPGRADE THE CAMERAS, TOO.
THIS
02:43:12.000 --> 02:43:16.000
DOESN'T PRECLUDE THAT, THIS AT LEAST GET SOMETHING ACCOMPLISHED AS FAR AS BEING
02:43:16.000 --> 02:43:21.000
ABLE >> I'M IN SUPPORT OF DOING IT ALL.
02:43:21.000 --> 02:43:24.000
AND, I SURE PEOPLE'S CONCERNS ABOUT WHAT'S HAPPENING
02:43:24.000 --> 02:43:31.000
IN OUR COUNTRY, BUT,
02:43:31.000 --> 02:43:34.000
I BELIEVE WHAT OUR ATTORNEY IS SAYING, AND I PERSONALLY AM SUPPORTIVE OF DOING
02:43:34.000 --> 02:43:39.000
THIS.
02:43:39.000 --> 02:43:43.000
HAVING BEEN VICTIM TO CRIMES HERE MORE THAN ANYWHERE ELSE IN 23 STATES THAT
02:43:43.000 --> 02:43:47.000
I'VE LIVED IN, THAT'S WHY I'M SUPPORTIVE OF IT. AT ANY RATE. 02:43:47.000 --> 02:43:54.000
IF YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER HINTON.
02:43:54.000 --> 02:43:58.000
>> WELL, I JUST WANTED TO SAY ALTHOUGH I STATED A CRIME THAT HAPPENED TO ME,
02:43:58.000 --> 02:44:01.000
THAT I THINK THE WAY I UNDERSTAND THE ORDINANCE AND WAS PROPOSED ON THE TABLE,
02:44:01.000 --> 02:44:09.000
THIS WOULD HAVE SOLVED MY SITUATION.
02:44:09.000 --> 02:44:12.000
WHICH IS THAT I COULD HAVE GOT THE CAMERA FROM THE AUTO BODY SHOP ACROSS THE
02:44:12.000 --> 02:44:14.000
WAY AND THE POLICE COULD HAVE SEEN IF THERE WAS INFORMATION THAT THEY
COULD HAVE
02:44:14.000 --> 02:44:19.000
PROSECUTED, CORRECT? THE ONLY THING WITH THE CHANGE THAT COUNCILMEMBER CARTER
02:44:19.000 --> 02:44:25.000
HAS PROPOSED IS THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL HAVE TO COME BACK TO US ON
02:44:25.000 --> 02:44:32.000
ANOTHER AGENDA ITEM, AND ASK FOR ANY UPDATES SPECIFIC TO CAMERAS 02:44:32.000 --> 02:44:35.000
, AND WE CAN GO THROUGH ALL OF THAT WHERE THEY'RE LOCATED, ET CETERA ET CETERA.
02:44:35.000 --> 02:44:38.000
CORRECT?
02:44:38.000 --> 02:44:41.000
>> THAT'S CORRECT.
02:44:41.000 --> 02:44:45.000
>> THAT'S ALL WE'RE DOING HERE. WE'RE STILL ON A COMPROMISE SOLVING SOME OF THE
02:44:45.000 --> 02:44:48.000
ISSUES I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT. I WILL BE SUPPORTING THE CHANGE TONIGHT. 02:44:48.000 --> 02:44:52.000
>> I GUESS I JUST NEED TO ASK,
02:44:52.000 --> 02:44:58.000
WHAT YOU ARE PROPOSING IS JUST TO ALLOW POLICE
02:44:58.000 --> 02:45:03.000
TO USE VIDEO. IF SOMEBODY OFFERS VIDEO TO SOLVE CRIMES, RIGHT? 02:45:03.000 --> 02:45:06.000
AND NOTHING ELSE, IF THE POLICE WANT TO BRING ANYTHING BACK OUT FOR
ADDITIONAL
02:45:06.000 --> 02:45:09.000
CAMERAS OR DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGY OR WHATEVER, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO
COME BACK
02:45:09.000 --> 02:45:12.000
WITH A JUSTIFY POLICY. IS THAT WAS ON THE TABLE?
02:45:12.000 --> 02:45:15.000
>> CORRECT.
02:45:15.000 --> 02:45:17.000
>> OKAY, THANK YOU.
02:45:17.000 --> 02:45:22.000
>> CAN I ASK A QUESTION FROM THE POLICE CHIEF? CHIEF, HOW MANY CAMERAS DO YOU
02:45:22.000 --> 02:45:27.000
BELIEVE ARE GOING TO NEED TO BE REPLACED ANYTIME SOON,
02:45:27.000 --> 02:45:33.000
I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THIS ISSUE. IT SEEMS LIKE A SMALL ISSUE AND FROM
02:45:33.000 --> 02:45:44.000
MY PERSPECTIVE, I'M WONDERING IF PEOPLE CAN HEAR YOU ONLINE. 02:45:44.000 --> 02:45:50.000
PEOPLE CAN HEAR YOU ONLINE IF YOU'RE NOT AT THE MIC.
02:45:50.000 --> 02:45:56.000
>> PERHAPS MARY COULD BETTER ADVISE. WE ALREADY BOUGHT A STAFF REPORT
FORWARD ON
02:45:56.000 --> 02:46:00.000
UPGRADING THE CAMERA SYSTEM WITHIN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT 02:46:00.000 --> 02:46:03.000
SO THAT IT MET THE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS OF ACTUALLY RECORDING AND
CAPTURING
02:46:03.000 --> 02:46:08.000
AUDIO AND VISUAL.
02:46:08.000 --> 02:46:12.000
I DON'T RECALL WHAT MONTH THAT WAS, I DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION WITH ME.
02:46:12.000 --> 02:46:17.000
>> THE PROCESS LAID OUT IN THE ORDINANCE IS A MULTI STEP PROCESS. 02:46:17.000 --> 02:46:20.000
THERE'S AN INITIAL REPORT ON CONSENT, THEN A PUBLIC HEARING 45 DAYS LATER WITH
02:46:20.000 --> 02:46:26.000
THE REPORT, THAT'S THE FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE, SO, 02:46:26.000 --> 02:46:34.000
FOR THE CAMERAS AT THE POLICE STATION, THE FIRST STEP WAS ALREADY DONE. 02:46:34.000 --> 02:46:37.000
SO WE COULD PICK UP WITH THE SECOND STEP AND DO THOSE SECOND STEPS FOR THOSE
02:46:37.000 --> 02:46:40.000
PARTICULAR SPECIFIC CAMERAS.
02:46:40.000 --> 02:46:42.000
>> WE DID AN IMPACT REPORT AS WELL. I'M SORRY.
02:46:42.000 --> 02:46:45.000
>> GO AHEAD.
02:46:45.000 --> 02:46:48.000
>> I'M NOT SURE, THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS NOT HAPPENED. THE FIRST STEP 02:46:48.000 --> 02:46:51.000
, I CAN'T REMEMBER IF THERE'S A DRAFT.
02:46:51.000 --> 02:46:57.000
>> WE DID A STAFF REPORT, WITH THE IMPACT REPORT.
02:46:57.000 --> 02:47:00.000
THAT'S ROLLED INTO WHERE WE ARE WITH THIS, I THINK. SOMEHOW THERE'S MORE 02:47:00.000 --> 02:47:05.000
.
02:47:05.000 --> 02:47:10.000
>> I DON'T THINK THE IMPACT REPORT WAS EVER BROUGHT TO THE COUNCIL. THERE WAS A
02:47:10.000 --> 02:47:16.000
PIVOTED DOING IT THIS WAY TO ADDRESS THIS, CONCERNED STAFF TIME AND IN A COUPLE
02:47:16.000 --> 02:47:22.000
YEARS, WHEN CAMERAS IN CITY HALL NEED TO BE REPLACED, NOT HAVE TO SPEND
ALL THAT
02:47:22.000 --> 02:47:28.000
TIME THAT'S A CONCERN SOMETIMES FROM THE COUNCIL. TRYING TO STRIKE A
BALANCE
02:47:28.000 --> 02:47:31.000
BY BEING EFFICIENT WITH STAFF TIME, BUT TAKE DIRECTION FROM THE COUNCIL
HOWEVER
02:47:31.000 --> 02:47:38.000
YOU WANT TO HANDLE.
02:47:38.000 --> 02:47:43.000
>>.IT. MY QUESTION WAS, THIS IS IN PROCESS WITH THE POLICE, IT FEELS LIKE 02:47:43.000 --> 02:47:50.000
>> I DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S ANYWHERE ELSE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IS THE
ONLY AREA
02:47:50.000 --> 02:47:54.000
THAT NEEDS A NEW CAMERA SYSTEM AT THIS POINT IN TIME. JUST BECAUSE AS I 02:47:54.000 --> 02:47:57.000
UNDERSTAND IT THE BEST PART OF 30 YEARS OLD. IT'S JUST TIME. 02:47:57.000 --> 02:48:04.000
>> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER HINTON.
02:48:04.000 --> 02:48:10.000
>> BASED ON THIS NEW INFORMATION THAT CAMERAS HAVE BEEN BOUGHT, IF WE
PASS THIS
02:48:10.000 --> 02:48:13.000
TONIGHT, THE NEXT STEP WOULD BE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS TO COME BACK TO THE
02:48:13.000 --> 02:48:17.000
FULL COUNCIL AND ASK IF THEY CAN USE THAT?
02:48:17.000 --> 02:48:23.000
>> THEY HAVEN'T BEEN BOUGHT YET.
02:48:23.000 --> 02:48:29.000
IT'S JUST, WE DID THE FIRST STEP IN THE PROCESS TO AUTHORIZE. CORRECT. 02:48:29.000 --> 02:48:36.000
>> AND, WE HAVE IT ON MARCH 3rd. I BELIEVE
02:48:36.000 --> 02:48:40.000
IF THIS ORDINANCE WAS APPROVED TONIGHT, MOVING FORWARD TO THE SECOND
READING,
--
02:48:40.000 --> 02:48:43.000
WE HAVE AN ITEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA DISCUSSING THE PURCHASE OF THE CAMERAS BASED
02:48:43.000 --> 02:48:46.000
ON THE APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE.
02:48:46.000 --> 02:48:50.000
>> THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS IF WE PASS IT THE WAY
02:48:50.000 --> 02:48:54.000
WE GOT A MOTION ON THE FLOOR THAT WE CAN STILL HAVE THAT MARCH MEETING, BUT
02:48:54.000 --> 02:48:57.000
THAT'S A SEPARATE DECISION. BY THE COUNCIL TO UPGRADE THE POLICE BUILDING 02:48:57.000 --> 02:49:00.000
CAMERAS. CORRECT?
02:49:00.000 --> 02:49:03.000
>> TO MEET THE PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENT.
02:49:03.000 --> 02:49:06.000
OKAY. I UNDERSTAND, THANK YOU.
02:49:06.000 --> 02:49:12.000
>> TO CLARIFY,
02:49:12.000 --> 02:49:15.000
THE IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PUBLIC SEARING HAS TO BE POSTED ON THE CITY'S
WEBSITE
02:49:15.000 --> 02:49:18.000
30 DAYS BEFORE THE PUBLIC HEARING, THAT WILL NOT BE COMING MARCH 3rd TO YOU. BUT
02:49:18.000 --> 02:49:26.000
IT CAN BE COMING IN THE FUTURE.
02:49:26.000 --> 02:49:30.000
>> IN ESSENCE WE'RE CREATING RED TAPE FOR THIS SOMETHING WE ALREADY HAD IN
02:49:30.000 --> 02:49:33.000
PLACE AND MOVING ALONG? BECAUSE NOW YOU'RE SAYING IT'LL HAVE TO BE
RELAYED THAT
02:49:33.000 --> 02:49:37.000
02:49:37.000 --> 02:49:44.000
>> THIS CHANGE IS NOT CREATING ANY ADDITIONAL RED TAPE. IT'S LEAVING THE STEPS
02:49:44.000 --> 02:49:47.000
IN PLACE THAT ALREADY EXIST INSTEAD OF ELIMINATING SOME OF THOSE STEPS. 02:49:47.000 --> 02:50:01.000
>> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, CHIEF.
02:50:01.000 --> 02:50:04.000
SO, NO FURTHER DISCUSSION AND I CAN CALL FOR THE VOTE? THANK YOU. SO
MOVED BY
02:50:04.000 --> 02:50:08.000
COUNCILMEMBER CARTER AND SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR MAURER. TWO 02:50:08.000 --> 02:50:12.000
APPROVED THE RECOMMENDATION IN ADOPTION OF THE FIRST READING INTRODUCTION OF
02:50:12.000 --> 02:50:15.000
THE ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.80 OF THE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY
COMMUNITY
02:50:15.000 --> 02:50:20.000
SAFETY ORDINANCE, NOT
02:50:20.000 --> 02:50:23.000
RECOMMENDING ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROPOSES TO CHANGES A AND B BUT
MAINTAINING THE
02:50:23.000 --> 02:50:30.000
CHANGES TO C AND D, THIS
02:50:30.000 --> 02:50:32.000
FACILITATES THE USE OF PRIVATE CAMERAS BUT IT WOULD NOT ALLOWED TO
UPGRADING
02:50:32.000 --> 02:50:35.000
CITY CAMERAS WITHOUT COUNCIL APPROVAL.
02:50:35.000 --> 02:50:38.000
COUNCILMEMBER CARTER?
02:50:38.000 --> 02:50:41.000
>> YES.
02:50:41.000 --> 02:50:43.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER HINTON?
02:50:43.000 --> 02:50:46.000
>> AYE.
02:50:46.000 --> 02:50:49.000
>> COUNCILMEMBERS ALLMAN?
02:50:49.000 --> 02:50:52.000
>> YES.
02:50:52.000 --> 02:50:54.000
>> VICE MAYOR MAURER?
02:50:54.000 --> 02:50:57.000
>> YES.
02:50:57.000 --> 02:51:01.000
>> MOTION PASSES 5-0. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE, IS EVERYONE OKAY? NO ONE
NEEDS A BIO
02:51:01.000 --> 02:51:08.000
BREAK GIVEN THE HOUR? OKAY. WE ARE MOVING ON TO REGULAR CALENDAR
DISCUSSION AND
02:51:08.000 --> 02:51:11.000
ACTION. NUMBER EIGHT, DISCUSSION OF THE SEBASTOPOL COMMUNITY CULTURAL CENTER
02:51:11.000 --> 02:51:15.000
SHORT LONG-TERM PLAN
02:51:15.000 --> 02:51:22.000
AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF, PRESENTLY MEMORANDUM PREPARED BY TONY
REGARDING
02:51:22.000 --> 02:51:26.000
SHORT AND LONG-TERM PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER AND DISCUSS
RECOMMENDATION
02:51:26.000 --> 02:51:29.000
FOR COUNCIL DIRECTION. I BELIEVE PUBLIC WORKS
02:51:29.000 --> 02:51:35.000
?
02:51:35.000 --> 02:51:39.000
>> TONY IS ON ZOOM AND SHE WILL BE PROVIDING THE INFORMATION FOR THE REPORT.
02:51:39.000 --> 02:51:46.000
>> SORRY, TONY, I HAD MY GLASSES ON. OKAY, GO AHEAD, TONY. 02:51:46.000 --> 02:51:50.000
>> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS, PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEER, AND I WILL
02:51:50.000 --> 02:51:52.000
BE PRESENTING AGENDA ITEM NUMBER EIGHT ON THE KENNEDY CENTER SHORT AND
LONG-TERM
02:51:52.000 --> 02:51:57.000
PLAN.
02:51:57.000 --> 02:52:03.000
JUST A BRIEF BACKGROUND ON THE MEMO INCLUDED IN YOUR AGENDA PACKET, DATED 02:52:03.000 --> 02:52:05.000
JANUARY 27, 2026, AND A CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS THAT LED TO THE MEMO. FIRST, THE
02:52:05.000 --> 02:52:11.000
CITY
02:52:11.000 --> 02:52:16.000
RECEIVED $1.5 MILLION IN FLOOD RELIEF FUNDS FOR THE 2019 FLOOD EVENT FOR FLOOD
02:52:16.000 --> 02:52:20.000
REPAIR AND MITIGATION PROJECTS IN THE CITY. THE CITY HAS USED SOME OF THIS
02:52:20.000 --> 02:52:24.000
FUNDING FOR MAKING FLOOD REPAIRS TO THE COMMITTEE CENTER SUCH AS 02:52:24.000 --> 02:52:29.000
REPAIRS TO THE MAIN HALL, THE ROOF, RESTROOM FACILITIES, 02:52:29.000 --> 02:52:36.000
THE KITCHEN, AND REPLACING THE DAMAGED WALLS WITH FIRE RATED WALLS THAT ARE
02:52:36.000 --> 02:52:39.000
ALSO MOISTURE RESISTANT. IN 2021 THE CITY STAFF IDENTIFIED BLOOD REPAIRS AN
02:52:39.000 --> 02:52:44.000
INITIAL LIST OF REPAIRS
02:52:44.000 --> 02:52:47.000
WAS PREPARED AT THAT TIME. ALSO IN 2021 PUBLIC WORKS ACQUIRED THE
SERVICES OF
02:52:47.000 --> 02:52:52.000
AN ENGINEER TO IDENTIFY AND EVALUATE
02:52:52.000 --> 02:52:55.000
LONG-TERM FLOOD APPROVING ALTERNATIVES. THE REPORT IS INCLUDED IN YOUR AGENDA
02:52:55.000 --> 02:53:01.000
PACKET.
02:53:01.000 --> 02:53:08.000
FOUR ALTERNATIVES WERE EVALUATED, RANGING IN COST FROM 650,000 TO $3.8
MILLION
02:53:08.000 --> 02:53:15.000
AND THE RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE WAS A REMOVABLE PERIMETER BARRIER AT $650,000.
02:53:15.000 --> 02:53:22.000
IN 2023 CITY STAFF INITIATED WORK WITH AN ARCHITECT TO REVISIT THE LIST OF
02:53:22.000 --> 02:53:25.000
REPAIRS THAT WAS INITIALLY PREPARED BACK IN 2021. AND CAME UP WITH WHAT
WERE YOU
02:53:25.000 --> 02:53:31.000
REFERRED TO AS A MASTER LIST OF REPAIRS.
02:53:31.000 --> 02:53:35.000
THE MASTER LIST OF REPAIRS IS INCLUDED IN YOUR AGENDA PACKET. 02:53:35.000 --> 02:53:42.000
I SHOULD NOTE, HOWEVER, THAT THE LIST WAS NOT UPDATED
02:53:42.000 --> 02:53:45.000
TO NOTE THAT CERTAIN AFFAIRS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, NOTABLY THE REPAIRS TO THE
02:53:45.000 --> 02:53:50.000
KITCHEN HOOD, AND THE NEW FIRE RATED WALLS. IN ADDITION, COMMUNITY CENTER STAFF
02:53:50.000 --> 02:53:53.000
HAS ALSO PERFORMED SOME TEMPORARY CEILING AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WALLS
WHERE THERE
02:53:53.000 --> 02:53:58.000
IS A ONE INCH GAP
02:53:58.000 --> 02:54:02.000
FOR BUGS AND CRITTERS TO GET THROUGH, AND THE MORE PERMANENT REPAIRS
WOULD BE
02:54:02.000 --> 02:54:06.000
MADE WITH THE PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. THE MASTER LIST WILL BE
02:54:06.000 --> 02:54:10.000
UPDATED TO INCLUDE THE REPAIRS THAT I HAVE MENTIONED,
02:54:10.000 --> 02:54:16.000
THEY WERE INADVERTENTLY LEFT OUT, AND WILL BE ATTACHED TO THE UPDATED MEMO. THE
02:54:16.000 --> 02:54:21.000
ARCHITECTS PREPARED PLANS IN A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE OF THE MASTER
LIST OF
02:54:21.000 --> 02:54:27.000
REPAIRS, AND THAT COST ESTIMATE IS $380,000 FOR THE REPAIRS 02:54:27.000 --> 02:54:32.000
, BECAUSE OF THE COST OF THE REPAIRS BEING HIGHER THAN $200,000 02:54:32.000 --> 02:54:36.000
, BY LAW THE CITY WOULD ALSO HAVE TO COMMIT AN ADDITIONAL 20% OF THE 02:54:36.000 --> 02:54:41.000
CONSTRUCTION TO MAKING A.D.A. ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE BUILDING WHICH
02:54:41.000 --> 02:54:50.000
WOULD INCREASE THE TOTAL COST FOR CONSTRUCTION TO $456,000. 02:54:50.000 --> 02:54:52.000
FOR THE SHORT TERM PLAN, STAFF RECOMMENDS MOVING FORWARD WITH
IMPLEMENTATION OF
02:54:52.000 --> 02:54:56.000
THE MASTER LIST OF IMPROVEMENTS
02:54:56.000 --> 02:54:59.000
, FINALIZING THE PLANS AND COST ESTIMATE THAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY THE 02:54:59.000 --> 02:55:06.000
ARCHITECT AND THAT COUNCIL APPROVED LIMITATION
02:55:06.000 --> 02:55:10.000
OF THE LIST OF REPAIRS IN 26-27 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. WHERE IN THE 02:55:10.000 --> 02:55:13.000
BUDGETING PROCESS RIGHT NOW FOR THAT PLAN. THEREFORE THE NEXT STEPS FOR THE
02:55:13.000 --> 02:55:18.000
SHORT TERM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
02:55:18.000 --> 02:55:23.000
WOULD BE, INCLUDE THE SHORT REPAIRS IN THE 26-47 STAFF
02:55:23.000 --> 02:55:27.000
AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, STAFF WOULD HAVE TO INCLUDE IN THE CIP BUDGET THE
02:55:27.000 --> 02:55:34.000
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION I MENTIONED TO YOU, THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION WOULD
02:55:34.000 --> 02:55:37.000
BE 456,000, YOU'D HAVE TO ADD A LITTLE BIT MORE TO THAT FOR FINAL DESIGN. 02:55:37.000 --> 02:55:45.000
AND IF
02:55:45.000 --> 02:55:51.000
APPROVED, THE FINAL DESIGN WOULD BEGIN IN JULY WITH PROJECT BIDDING AND AWARD
02:55:51.000 --> 02:55:58.000
WOULD START IN THE FALL. AND WORK COMPLETED IN 2027.
02:55:58.000 --> 02:56:02.000
FOR THE LONG-TERM PLAN, PUBLIC WORKS STAFF DID NOT BELIEVE THAT THE
REMOVABLE
02:56:02.000 --> 02:56:07.000
BARRIER THAT WAS RECOMMENDED IN THE REPORT WOULD BE FEASIBLE DUE TO THE NUMBER
02:56:07.000 --> 02:56:11.000
OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF THAT WOULD NEED TO BE DEPLOYED TO PERFORM THE WORK.
THERE
02:56:11.000 --> 02:56:18.000
WAS CONCERN OF HOW TO STORE THE BARRIER. THERE WAS A SUGGESTION 02:56:18.000 --> 02:56:23.000
RECENTLY OF WORKING WITH OTHER AGENCIES SUCH AS GOLD RIDGE FIRE DISTRICT, 02:56:23.000 --> 02:56:26.000
AND STAFF CAN LOOK INTO THE FEASIBILITY OF THAT AS WELL AS FURTHER AT
WHERE TO
02:56:26.000 --> 02:56:33.000
STORE THE PORTABLE BARRIER SYSTEM.
02:56:33.000 --> 02:56:36.000
AS WE CONTINUE TO EXPLORE THE FEASIBILITY OF THE PERIMETER SYSTEM, IT IS 02:56:36.000 --> 02:56:40.000
RECOMMENDED THAT STAFF BE DIRECTED TO EXPLORE AND MOVE FORWARD WITH 02:56:40.000 --> 02:56:44.000
IMPLEMENTATION OF A SHARED CIVIC SPACE EITHER WITH THE SEBASTOPOL
COMMENTS OR
02:56:44.000 --> 02:56:51.000
WITH ANOTHER NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION. THIS WAS NOT AN EASY PROJECT TO GO
THROUGH
02:56:51.000 --> 02:56:58.000
BECAUSE THE COMMUNITY CENTER IS A VERY IMPORTANT CENTER FOR THE
COMMUNITY, AND
02:56:58.000 --> 02:57:04.000
SO, WE DO BELIEVE THAT SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE IN TERMS OF THE SHORT TERM
02:57:04.000 --> 02:57:07.000
IMPROVEMENTS. IN THE LONG TERM, WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO EXPLORE THAT, BUT
02:57:07.000 --> 02:57:11.000
WHILE WE DO THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH
02:57:11.000 --> 02:57:14.000
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SHARED CIVIC SPACE WITH THE SEBASTOPOL COMMENTS AND BEGIN
02:57:14.000 --> 02:57:20.000
THE DISCUSSION.
02:57:20.000 --> 02:57:23.000
AND THAT CONCLUDES MY ORAL PRESENTATION, AND WITH ME HERE TO HELP ANSWER 02:57:23.000 --> 02:57:29.000
QUESTIONS IS ERIC BILLING, PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR.
02:57:29.000 --> 02:57:42.000
>> ERIC?
02:57:42.000 --> 02:57:45.000
>> I'M JUST HERE FOR QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PROPOSAL.
THE
02:57:45.000 --> 02:57:54.000
RECOMMENDATIONS OR STAFF TIME, ON WHY WE DON'T THINK
02:57:54.000 --> 02:58:00.000
THE REMOVABLE BARRIER IS THE BEST OPTION, I'M HERE TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS.
02:58:00.000 --> 02:58:07.000
>> ANY QUESTIONS FROM ANYONE? NO? OKAY. I HAVE A QUESTION 02:58:07.000 --> 02:58:14.000
FOR THE FOLKS FROM THE COMMUNITY CENTER, THE BOARD. SOMEONE WHO WANTS TO 02:58:14.000 --> 02:58:20.000
.
02:58:20.000 --> 02:58:26.000
>> THANK YOU. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE
02:58:26.000 --> 02:58:29.000
, AS MANY PEOPLE KNOW I SERVED ON THE COMMITTEE CENTER BOARD FOR A NUMBER OF
02:58:29.000 --> 02:58:35.000
YEARS. I FEEL INTIMATELY AWARE AND SAT ON THE FLOOD MITIGATION 02:58:35.000 --> 02:58:38.000
COMMITTEE FOR A LONG TIME, BUT I WANTED TO VERIFY WITH YOU ALL. WE ARE
MANAGERS
02:58:38.000 --> 02:58:43.000
OF THE BUILDING. AND THE COMMUNITY CENTER
02:58:43.000 --> 02:58:50.000
IS RUN BY ITS OWN NONPROFIT. WHEN WE SAY THAT
02:58:50.000 --> 02:58:55.000
WE WANT THE CITY TO DIRECT THE COMMUNITY CENTER TO WORK WITH 02:58:55.000 --> 02:59:02.000
THESE OTHER ENTITIES OR WHATEVER TO FIND SHARED SPACES, WHAT I'D LIKE TO HEAR
02:59:02.000 --> 02:59:06.000
FROM YOU IS, IN MY OPINION IT'S NOT OUR PRAYER PLACE TO TELL A NONPROFIT, WE OWN
02:59:06.000 --> 02:59:12.000
THE BUILDING, WE LEASE IT TO YOU. THERE'S A DISTINCT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 02:59:12.000 --> 02:59:15.000
WHAT WE CAN DIRECT AND WHAT YOUR BOARD DIRECTS. I WANT TO KNOW FROM YOUR 02:59:15.000 --> 02:59:20.000
PERSPECTIVE, ARE YOU SUPPORTIVE OF THAT?
02:59:20.000 --> 02:59:23.000
IT SAYS RIGHT HERE, DIRECT STAFF TO EXPLORE AND MOVE FORWARD WITH 02:59:23.000 --> 02:59:29.000
IMPLEMENTATION FOR SHARED CIVIC SPACE, EITHER WITH THE COMMENTS OR WHATEVER.
02:59:29.000 --> 02:59:36.000
I'M ASKING YOU IS THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD, IS THE BOARD SUPPORTIVE OF THAT 02:59:36.000 --> 02:59:43.000
DIRECTIVE? >> YES. WE RECOGNIZE THE ISSUES WITH THE BUILDING. IN THE
SHORT-TERM
02:59:43.000 --> 02:59:49.000
AND THE LONG-TERM, AND THERE'S BEEN A VARIETY OF EXPLORATIONS 02:59:49.000 --> 02:59:53.000
OF NEW FACILITIES RELOCATED, REBUILT, OVER THE DECADES. 02:59:53.000 --> 02:59:55.000
>> DOESN'T IT FEEL LIKE GROUNDHOG DAY?
02:59:55.000 --> 03:00:00.000
>> WE ARE OPEN TO PARTICIPATING
03:00:00.000 --> 03:00:03.000
IN THE COMMONS PROCESS AND OPEN TO DISCUSSIONS WITH OTHER ENTITIES FOR THE
03:00:03.000 --> 03:00:06.000
LONG-TERM SOLUTIONS.
03:00:06.000 --> 03:00:13.000
>> I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT BECAUSE
03:00:13.000 --> 03:00:16.000
I ALWAYS WANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT THESE ARE NONPROFITS RUNNING WITH THEIR OWN
03:00:16.000 --> 03:00:21.000
DIRECTIVES, THEIR OWN BYLAWS AND INITIATIVES, AND
03:00:21.000 --> 03:00:24.000
IT'S THE DECISION OF THE NONPROFIT WHAT DIRECTION THEY WANT TO GO WITH
WHATEVER
03:00:24.000 --> 03:00:26.000
THEY'RE DOING.
03:00:26.000 --> 03:00:29.000
>> WE APPRECIATE
03:00:29.000 --> 03:00:32.000
THE THOUGHT ABOUT THAT, YES.
03:00:32.000 --> 03:00:35.000
>> THANK YOU, THAT'S THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW IF
ANYBODY ELSE
03:00:35.000 --> 03:00:39.000
HAS ANY. GO AHEAD, VICE MAYOR.
03:00:39.000 --> 03:00:42.000
>> WHAT'S THE IDEA OF RAISING THE BUILDING UP DISCUSSED AND WHAT WOULD
THE COST
03:00:42.000 --> 03:00:50.000
BE FOR RAISING THE BUILDING UP?
03:00:50.000 --> 03:00:56.000
>> I'M NOT AWARE OF THAT DISCUSSION. THAT WAS A PREVIOUS DIRECTOR HAD TALKED
03:00:56.000 --> 03:01:01.000
ABOUT THAT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FEASIBILITY OF THAT IS, THE STRUCTURE ITSELF
03:01:01.000 --> 03:01:08.000
HAS MAJOR CHALLENGES. TO TAKE THAT COMPROMISED STRUCTURE AND RAISE IT UP WOULD
03:01:08.000 --> 03:01:13.000
BE A PRETTY ASTRONOMICAL FEET, ALMOST BETTER TO STIR -- TEAR IT DOWN AND START
03:01:13.000 --> 03:01:19.000
FROM NOON, I THINK. BUT WE CAN LOOK INTO THE COST OF TRYING TO RAISE IT UP.
03:01:19.000 --> 03:01:25.000
TRYING TO RAISE IT UP. BECAUSE THE OTHER ISSUE WITH THAT IS, A.D.A.
COMPLIANCE.
03:01:25.000 --> 03:01:28.000
NOW WE HAVE TO PUT AN A.D.A. ELEVATOR TO GET ACCESS TO THE MAIN FLOOR AND THE
03:01:28.000 --> 03:01:34.000
UPPER FLOOR.
03:01:34.000 --> 03:01:39.000
>> IN ORDER, IF WE WANTED TO LOOK INTO THAT FURTHER, WE WOULD HAVE TO
ACQUIRE
03:01:39.000 --> 03:01:43.000
THE SERVICES OF A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AS WELL AS AN ARCHITECT. AND I
HAVEN'T
03:01:43.000 --> 03:01:49.000
RIGHT NOW EXPLORE THE COST OF DOING THAT. BUT WE CAN FIND OUT. 03:01:49.000 --> 03:01:54.000
>> THE YOUTH ANNEX IS ABOVE THE FLOOD LEVEL, RIGHT?
03:01:54.000 --> 03:01:57.000
WE DON'T HAVE AN ELEVATOR HERE. WHY WOULD THAT REQUIRE AN ELEVATOR AT THE 03:01:57.000 --> 03:02:01.000
COMMUNITY CENTER?
03:02:01.000 --> 03:02:04.000
>> THE YOUTH ANNEX WAS BUILT THIS WAY, IT HAS A RAMP THAT ACTS AS AN A.D.A.
03:02:04.000 --> 03:02:11.000
ACCESS THAT WE DON'T HAVE CURRENTLY FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER. 03:02:11.000 --> 03:02:15.000
AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT RAISING IT OUT OF THE FRONT PLANE WHICH WOULD BE 03:02:15.000 --> 03:02:17.000
RAISING IT SIGNIFICANTLY. WE WOULD HAVE TO RAISE IT SIX FEET, SIX TO
EIGHT FEET,
03:02:17.000 --> 03:02:20.000
WHICH IS PRETTY SIGNIFICANT.
03:02:20.000 --> 03:02:24.000
>> GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER HINTON.
03:02:24.000 --> 03:02:28.000
>> READING THIS, I JUST WANTED TO VERIFY, IS THIS EXPENSE THAT 03:02:28.000 --> 03:02:35.000
IS THE SHORT-TERM OPTION,
03:02:35.000 --> 03:02:40.000
$456,000, IS THAT'S WHAT'S LEFT FROM THE
03:02:40.000 --> 03:02:44.000
ORIGINAL FLOOD MITIGATION MONEY THAT WE GOT IN 2019 OF THE 1.5? 03:02:44.000 --> 03:02:49.000
IS THAT STILL SITTING THERE
03:02:49.000 --> 03:02:53.000
BEING PROPOSED TO USE ON THIS PROJECT? IS THAT COMING OUT OF OUR CAPITAL 03:02:53.000 --> 03:02:58.000
IMPROVEMENT, AND SEPARATE FROM THE 1.5?
03:02:58.000 --> 03:03:02.000
>> IT'S PROPOSED TO BE COMING OUT OF THE FLOOD MITIGATION MONIES. THERE 03:03:02.000 --> 03:03:05.000
SUFFICIENT FUNDING IN THE BALANCE OF THAT ACCOUNT TO BE ABLE TO PAY FOR THAT
03:03:05.000 --> 03:03:08.000
PROJECT.
03:03:08.000 --> 03:03:14.000
>> WHAT IS THE BALANCE OF THAT ACCOUNT?
03:03:14.000 --> 03:03:20.000
>> 700,000. I BELIEVE IT'S IN YOUR REPORT AS WELL. 700,000. 03:03:20.000 --> 03:03:26.000
>> I BELIEVE, I COULD LOOK THAT UP.
03:03:26.000 --> 03:03:30.000
GO AHEAD WITH YOUR OTHER QUESTIONS WELL I LOOK THAT UP. 03:03:30.000 --> 03:03:34.000
>> I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION. I KNOW I MENTIONED
03:03:34.000 --> 03:03:37.000
EARLIER OVER THE LAST DECADE,
03:03:37.000 --> 03:03:43.000
AND IT'S BASED ON
03:03:43.000 --> 03:03:51.000
A FEW YEARS AGO, I HAVEN'T BEEN IN ALL THESE MEETINGS, HAS THERE BEEN
ANOTHER
03:03:51.000 --> 03:03:56.000
SPACE IDENTIFIED? I KNOW ALL THE CHALLENGES THAT WITH THE NOISE AND THE SIZE,
03:03:56.000 --> 03:03:59.000
WITH COMMERCIAL KITCHEN, WE HAVE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF BUILDINGS IN THE
CITY HAS
03:03:59.000 --> 03:04:04.000
ANOTHER SPACE.
03:04:04.000 --> 03:04:07.000
APPEARED, THAT ACTUALLY WOULD
03:04:07.000 --> 03:04:10.000
, IT'S A VERY SPECIFIC SIZE AND NEEDS.
03:04:10.000 --> 03:04:18.000
>> THERE HASN'T BEEN
03:04:18.000 --> 03:04:24.000
A SEARCH BY CITY STAFF OR CONSULTANTS, OR BY THE COMMUNITY CENTER, AND
THERE'S
03:04:24.000 --> 03:04:30.000
TALK OF VARIOUS DIFFERENT SITES, PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT IDEAS ABOUT THAT.
THERE
03:04:30.000 --> 03:04:33.000
ARE SOME POTENTIALS OUT THERE, THEY WOULD NEED TO BE LOOKED AT SERIOUSLY. 03:04:33.000 --> 03:04:39.000
>> AND WHAT WOULD YOU
03:04:39.000 --> 03:04:41.000
IDENTIFY AS THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER NEEDS IN ORDER TO, THE
MAJORITY
03:04:41.000 --> 03:04:45.000
OF THE FUNDS,
03:04:45.000 --> 03:04:52.000
THE FUNDS THAT YOU HOST EVENTS BASICALLY,
03:04:52.000 --> 03:04:56.000
THOSE EVENTS ARE, I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S STILL THE CASE THAT THE LION'S SHARE
03:04:56.000 --> 03:04:59.000
OF THE FUNDING THAT COMES IN, IT'S BEEN A NUMBER OF YEARS AS I'VE BEEN ON THE
03:04:59.000 --> 03:05:04.000
BOARD. IT USED TO BE THAT, SO IS THAT STILL THE CASE, WHAT KIND OF SPACE WOULD
03:05:04.000 --> 03:05:13.000
YOU NEED? TO BE ABLE TO CONTINUE DOING WHAT YOU DO.
03:05:13.000 --> 03:05:16.000
>> REVENUE SOURCES INCLUDE CLASSES, GRANTS, CONCERT REVENUE 03:05:16.000 --> 03:05:25.000
WHEN THEY MAKE MONEY, WHICH THEY DON'T ALWAYS.
03:05:25.000 --> 03:05:28.000
AND ALSO ROOM RENTALS. WE DO ALL OF THOSE THINGS, AND ALL THAT BRINGS IN 03:05:28.000 --> 03:05:32.000
REVENUE THAT MAKES UP OUR BUDGET.
03:05:32.000 --> 03:05:39.000
SECOND PART OF YOUR QUESTION.
03:05:39.000 --> 03:05:42.000
>> I'VE HAD PEOPLE ASKING ME QUESTIONS AND I'M SO CLOSE TO THIS AND HAVE BEEN
03:05:42.000 --> 03:05:45.000
INVOLVED FOR SO LONG. SOMETIMES I FORGET THE PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND OR
KNOW ALL
03:05:45.000 --> 03:05:48.000
THESE THINGS. I WAS SAYING TO SOMEONE YESTERDAY, THE COMMUNITY CENTER, YOU DO
03:05:48.000 --> 03:05:55.000
THE ALL THE DIFFERENT THINGS,
03:05:55.000 --> 03:06:00.000
SO YOU HAVE VERY SPECIFIC NEEDS THAT YOU WOULD NEED IN ANY NEW SPACE THAT YOU
03:06:00.000 --> 03:06:05.000
HAD, WHICH WOULD BE SPACE TO HOLD FOR THE EVENT, PLUS THE COMMERCIAL KITCHEN.
03:06:05.000 --> 03:06:10.000
I WAS TRYING TO TAKE OFF THE THINGS THAT WE NEEDED FOR YOUR SPACE. I
THINK IT'S
03:06:10.000 --> 03:06:17.000
GOOD FOR PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND THE CHALLENGES. I HEAR YOU SHOULD JUST MOVE IT,
03:06:17.000 --> 03:06:22.000
AND EVERYBODY HAS TALKED ABOUT THAT. IT'S NOT AS SIMPLE AS THAT. 03:06:22.000 --> 03:06:29.000
>> ONCE WE ENGAGED IN A PROCESS, WE WOULD EVALUATE OUR EXISTING SPACE, THE
03:06:29.000 --> 03:06:33.000
BUILDING WASN'T DESIGNED TO BE A COMMUNITY CENTER, IT'S NOT IDEAL IN
SEVERAL
03:06:33.000 --> 03:06:35.000
RESPECTS, LIKE NOT HAVING A BACKSTAGE. NOT HAVING A BATHROOM 03:06:35.000 --> 03:06:38.000
FOR THE GREENROOM.
03:06:38.000 --> 03:06:46.000
>> THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING.
03:06:46.000 --> 03:06:50.000
>> IN THE IDEAL WE WOULD LOOK AT THE FULL PROGRAM THE EXISTING SPACE, AND THEN,
03:06:50.000 --> 03:06:56.000
START FIGURING OUT
03:06:56.000 --> 03:06:59.000
IF THERE ARE EXISTING SITES OR EXISTING BUILDINGS, WORKING WITH THE CITY, OF
03:06:59.000 --> 03:07:03.000
COURSE.
03:07:03.000 --> 03:07:06.000
>> THAT DOESN'T ANSWER MY QUESTION, BUT OKAY. THANK YOU. 03:07:06.000 --> 03:07:11.000
>> I DID CHECK.
03:07:11.000 --> 03:07:16.000
>> GO AHEAD, TONY.
03:07:16.000 --> 03:07:19.000
>> I DO WANT TO ANSWER THE QUESTION ABOUT THE FUND BALANCE ON THE FLOOD 03:07:19.000 --> 03:07:22.000
MITIGATION FUND. I CHECKED THE BUDGET AND THE ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE IS 03:07:22.000 --> 03:07:32.000
$862,000.
03:07:32.000 --> 03:07:38.000
>> FIRST, I THINK IT'S FAIRLY REASONABLE TO DO THE $456,000 WORTH OF
REPAIRS,
03:07:38.000 --> 03:07:47.000
BECAUSE IT'S A VALUABLE BUILDING AND IT SHOULDN'T BE COMPLETELY MANDATED. 03:07:47.000 --> 03:07:50.000
I DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M ALLOWED TO SAY OR WHAT I'M NOT ALLOWED TO SAY ABOUT THE
03:07:50.000 --> 03:07:54.000
CREATIVE COMMENTS EFFORT. WE HAVE PUT IN SIGNIFICANT EFFORT -- 03:07:54.000 --> 03:08:00.000
>> WE ARE IN QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW.
03:08:00.000 --> 03:08:03.000
>> I'M NOT ALLOWED TO SAY THAT STUFF.
03:08:03.000 --> 03:08:06.000
>> GO AHEAD, VICE MAYOR.
03:08:06.000 --> 03:08:14.000
>> TWO QUESTIONS. WHAT WAS
03:08:14.000 --> 03:08:18.000
THE BUILDING ORIGINALLY DESIGNED FOR? THAT WAS MY FIRST QUESTION, HE SAID IT
03:08:18.000 --> 03:08:21.000
WASN'T DESIGNED AS COMMUNITY CENTER, I HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION. 03:08:21.000 --> 03:08:29.000
>> I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS TRUE, IT'S BEFORE MY TIME.
03:08:29.000 --> 03:08:34.000
I UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS BUILT FOR BOXING PURPOSES. BOXING CLUB OR WHATEVER.
03:08:34.000 --> 03:08:37.000
>> AND WAS IT CITY PROPERTY?
03:08:37.000 --> 03:08:44.000
>> I CAN CONFIRM THAT IS CORRECT.
03:08:44.000 --> 03:08:47.000
>> THIS IS AN EXTRA QUESTION, WAS IT CITY PROPERTY ORIGINALLY? DID THE
CITY BY
03:08:47.000 --> 03:08:49.000
THE PROPERTY?
03:08:49.000 --> 03:08:57.000
>> I DO NOT KNOW THAT. I'M NOT SURE, I THINK IT WAS A YMCA 03:08:57.000 --> 03:09:01.000
BOYS GYMNASIUM, I'M NOT SURE HOW THE CITY ACQUIRED THE PROPERTY. THAT'S WHAT
03:09:01.000 --> 03:09:09.000
THE ORIGINAL INTENT WAS, IT WAS A BARN WITH FIGHTING RINGS IN IT. 03:09:09.000 --> 03:09:12.000
>> IT COULD BE A NEW ARTICLE FOR YOU.
03:09:12.000 --> 03:09:18.000
MY SECOND QUESTION IS,
03:09:18.000 --> 03:09:22.000
WHAT IS THE POSITION OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE YOU SPEND A EURO OR SO ON THIS,
03:09:22.000 --> 03:09:27.000
DID YOU COME INDIVIDUALLY TO CONCLUSION ABOUT WHAT YOU THINK IS BEST FOR THIS
03:09:27.000 --> 03:09:32.000
BUILDING? I'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM BOTH OF YOU.
03:09:32.000 --> 03:09:35.000
>> SURE, I DEFINITELY AGREED WITH THE CONTENTS OF THE REPORT THAT WE
PRESENTED
03:09:35.000 --> 03:09:40.000
AS FAR AS THE SHORT-TERM AND THE LONG-TERM GOALS.
03:09:40.000 --> 03:09:48.000
AS FAR AS, WE LEFT IT BROAD.
03:09:48.000 --> 03:09:53.000
AND THE SHORT-TERM GOAL OF PAYING THE 456,000 WAS SOMETHING THAT 03:09:53.000 --> 03:09:55.000
WE AGREED TO, AND AS FAR AS THE LONG-TERM ARE WORKING WITH THE SEBASTOPOL 03:09:55.000 --> 03:10:03.000
COMMENTS WERE ANOTHER
03:10:03.000 --> 03:10:06.000
NONPROFIT.
03:10:06.000 --> 03:10:08.000
>> WE BOTH AGREED WITH THAT. I HAVE THESE QUESTIONS BECAUSE I'VE BEEN ASKED
03:10:08.000 --> 03:10:13.000
THESE QUESTIONS AND BEING SO CLOSE TO IT FOR SO LONG I ASSUMED PEOPLE
UNDERSTOOD
03:10:13.000 --> 03:10:15.000
THE CHALLENGES. THAT PEOPLE FACE. WE BOTH AGREED WITH IT, BECAUSE
EXPLORING THE
03:10:15.000 --> 03:10:21.000
DIFFERENT OPTIONS, I MEAN,
03:10:21.000 --> 03:10:25.000
AT THIS POINT IN TIME, THIS IS WHAT MAKES THE MOST SENSE. 03:10:25.000 --> 03:10:32.000
>> MAY I RESPOND TO COUNCILMEMBER MAURER. AS A MEMBER
03:10:32.000 --> 03:10:35.000
OF CREATING THE COMMONS, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'RE PROUD OF. WE
DEFINITELY
03:10:35.000 --> 03:10:39.000
EXPLORED
03:10:39.000 --> 03:10:44.000
MOST OF THE AVAILABLE RESOURCES IN THE CITY.
03:10:44.000 --> 03:10:49.000
WE'RE PUTTING GOOD FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OVER THEM. WE THINK 03:10:49.000 --> 03:10:54.000
THERE ARE A COUPLE OF GOOD PROSPECTS FOR SOMETHING
03:10:54.000 --> 03:10:58.000
IN THE MID TO LONG-TERM RANGE, WE CAN'T SAY ANYTHING SPECIFIC BECAUSE WE'RE
03:10:58.000 --> 03:11:01.000
GOING OVER THIS STUFF, BUT YOU CAN WATCH PAST VIDEOS TO SEE WHAT WE THOUGHT. I
03:11:01.000 --> 03:11:09.000
THINK THERE'S A REASONABLE CHANCE
03:11:09.000 --> 03:11:17.000
TO CREATE SOME SYNERGY WITH OTHER NEEDS THAT THE CITY HAS IN A WAY THAT I THINK
03:11:17.000 --> 03:11:27.000
BENEFITS THE CULTURAL CENTER IN A GREAT WAY. BUT THESE ARE ALL TO BE DEVELOPED.
03:11:27.000 --> 03:11:31.000
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BEFORE WE GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT? GO AHEAD, MARY. 03:11:31.000 --> 03:11:38.000
>> THANK YOU, MAYOR, THIS IS PUBLIC COMMENT
03:11:38.000 --> 03:11:42.000
ON THE SEBASTOPOL CULTURAL COMMUNITY CENTER FACILITIES ASSESSMENT REPORT.
IF
03:11:42.000 --> 03:11:45.000
YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT IT IS TWO MINUTES IN CHAMBERS AND THEN
03:11:45.000 --> 03:11:48.000
OUT TO ZOOM. IF THERE'S ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC
03:11:48.000 --> 03:11:51.000
COMMENT.
03:11:51.000 --> 03:11:54.000
>> KENYON WEBSTER, PRESIDENT OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
WE
03:11:54.000 --> 03:12:04.000
SUPPORT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THIS MATTER.
03:12:04.000 --> 03:12:10.000
AS FAR AS THE SHORT-TERM, ISSUES, DEFINITELY WE SUPPORT THE IDEA 03:12:10.000 --> 03:12:16.000
OF FOLDING THIS INTO YOUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS. AND PLAN. 03:12:16.000 --> 03:12:19.000
ONE OF THE PAGES OF THE STAFF REPORT IT TALKS ABOUT NOTED ISSUES INCLUDE 03:12:19.000 --> 03:12:25.000
NUMEROUS LEAKS
03:12:25.000 --> 03:12:28.000
IN THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, ROTTED WOOD IN CONTACT WITH THE
03:12:28.000 --> 03:12:32.000
CONCRETE, MOISTURE IN THE INTERIOR BUILDING EVIDENT THROUGHOUT. EXTENSIVE 03:12:32.000 --> 03:12:38.000
CORROSION THROUGH STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBERS OF THE BUILDING. 03:12:38.000 --> 03:12:41.000
THERE ARE SOME NOTEWORTHY ISSUES WITH THE BUILDING AS IT IS, AND AT SOME POINT
03:12:41.000 --> 03:12:45.000
IF REPAIRS ARE NOT MADE,
03:12:45.000 --> 03:12:50.000
IT COULD ENDANGER
03:12:50.000 --> 03:12:55.000
THE OPERATION OF THE BUILDING ALTOGETHER. WE THINK IT'S VERY APPROPRIATE 03:12:55.000 --> 03:13:02.000
THAT THIS BE FOLDED INTO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS, 03:13:02.000 --> 03:13:12.000
AND YOU CAN CONSIDER AND GET UPDATED INFORMATION IN THAT PROCESS. THANK YOU.
03:13:12.000 --> 03:13:15.000
>> THANK YOU, NEXT I GO OUT TO ZOOM, ROBERT, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE?
03:13:15.000 --> 03:13:21.000
CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER? GREAT, GO AHEAD.
03:13:21.000 --> 03:13:25.000
>> IT SEEMS LIKE YOU GOT A SEPARATE, WHAT IS THE EMOTIONAL ISSUE OF THE 03:13:25.000 --> 03:13:29.000
COMMUNITY CENTER AND ALL THE ISSUES SURROUNDING THAT AND WHERE DOES IT
GO, HOW
03:13:29.000 --> 03:13:34.000
DOES IT WORK, WHAT DOES IT NEED? THAT'S A SEPARATE ISSUE, AND YOUR ISSUE AS A
03:13:34.000 --> 03:13:40.000
CITY COUNCIL IS YOU OWN A BUILDING, IT'S PRETTY VALUABLE, AT LEAST YOU'VE SUNK A
03:13:40.000 --> 03:13:43.000
LOT OF TAXPAYER MONEY INTO IT IN THE LAST FOUR OR FIVE YEARS, IT NEEDS TO BE
03:13:43.000 --> 03:13:48.000
FIXED, STILL, AND YOU HAVE MONEY TO FIX IT,
03:13:48.000 --> 03:13:52.000
AND I THINK THAT MONEY IS RESTRICTED, PROBABLY TO ONLY FIXING THIS BUILDING.
03:13:52.000 --> 03:13:56.000
YOU EITHER USE IT OR SEND IT BACK TO THE GOVERNMENT.
03:13:56.000 --> 03:14:03.000
I'M NOT SURE ABOUT THAT, THAT'S A QUESTION YOU COULD ASK. 03:14:03.000 --> 03:14:08.000
IF YOU'RE GOING TO PUT $400,000 INTO THE BUILDING, YOU PROBABLY OUGHT TO 03:14:08.000 --> 03:14:16.000
PROTECT IT FROM FLOODS. IT'S BEEN FOUR, FIVE YEARS, NOW THAT WE'VE BEEN
TALKING
03:14:16.000 --> 03:14:21.000
ABOUT THIS. IT'S RAINING RIGHT NOW, YOU'RE FOUR FEET FROM FLOOD ACTION STAGE,
03:14:21.000 --> 03:14:28.000
AND IS GOING TO RAIN FOR THE NEXT 10 DAYS. THIS MIGHT BE THE MOMENT WHERE WE GET
03:14:28.000 --> 03:14:34.000
ANOTHER FLOOD. IF NOT, IT'S COMING. SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE TO PROTECT THAT
03:14:34.000 --> 03:14:38.000
INVESTMENT. IT SEEMS LIKE THE TEMPORARY BARRIER COULD BE DONE 03:14:38.000 --> 03:14:45.000
PRETTY COST-EFFECTIVELY, IT'S THE ONLY COST-EFFECTIVE CHOICE. 03:14:45.000 --> 03:14:48.000
THE ISSUE IS WHO'S GOING TO PUT IT UP. SOMEBODY POINTED OUT AT PUBLIC
COMMENT,
03:14:48.000 --> 03:14:52.000
MAYBE THE FIREFIGHTERS WOULD HELP US, AND THEY MIGHT. BOY SCOUTS, THERE WERE A
03:14:52.000 --> 03:14:59.000
LOT OF HEALTHY YOUNG MEN THEY ARE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING TO DO. 03:14:59.000 --> 03:15:01.000
YOU CAN ENLIST SOMEBODY LIKE THE BOY SCOUTS OR OTHER VOLUNTEERS FROM THE 03:15:01.000 --> 03:15:04.000
COMMUNITY TO DO THAT, MAYBE THAT WOULDN'T BE THE MAJOR BARRIER. STORAGE, THE
03:15:04.000 --> 03:15:10.000
CORPORATE YARD IS ACROSS THE STREET, IT SEEMS LIKE STORAGE ISN'T THE
BIGGEST
03:15:10.000 --> 03:15:17.000
PROBLEM. I DON'T KNOW THE ISSUES THAT HASN'T BEEN RAISED PUBLICLY. 03:15:17.000 --> 03:15:19.000
MY THOUGHT IS, YOU GOT TO FOCUS ON THE BUILDING AND NOT ON THE COMMITTEE 03:15:19.000 --> 03:15:22.000
CENTER. THANK YOU.
03:15:22.000 --> 03:15:25.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. SORRY.
03:15:25.000 --> 03:15:30.000
>> I'M NOT VOLUNTEERING.
03:15:30.000 --> 03:15:33.000
>> I WILL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS IF THERE'S ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT
WOULD LIKE
03:15:33.000 --> 03:15:40.000
TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT.
03:15:40.000 --> 03:15:46.000
>> I'LL SAY GOOD EVENING. SO,
03:15:46.000 --> 03:15:50.000
THE SEBASTOPOL COMMUNITY CULTURAL CENTER, I KNOW I'M PREACHING TO THE CHOIR
03:15:50.000 --> 03:15:53.000
HERE, WHAT AN INCREDIBLE ASSET FOR THE WORK THEY DO. WE'RE IN THIS
BUILDING
03:15:53.000 --> 03:15:58.000
RIGHT NOW.
03:15:58.000 --> 03:16:06.000
THE CITY HALL, THE CHAMBERS, WE'RE WORKING TOGETHER. I REALLY LOVE SEEING THAT,
03:16:06.000 --> 03:16:11.000
IT SEEMS LIKE READY TO INVEST THESE FUNDS INTO THE COMMUNITY CENTER. I WOULD
03:16:11.000 --> 03:16:14.000
PAUSE, I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE SPECIFICITY WITH WHICH KENYON WEBSTER SAID WITH
03:16:14.000 --> 03:16:18.000
THE OTHER PIECES,
03:16:18.000 --> 03:16:21.000
IS A FORMER BOARD MEMBER BUT OUR FORMER PLANNING DIRECTOR, IT'S REALLY 03:16:21.000 --> 03:16:29.000
IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER THOSE COMMENTS.
03:16:29.000 --> 03:16:35.000
AND IT REALLY WARMED MY HEART TO HEAR HIM SAY, HOW KENYON SAID ABOUT
WORKING
03:16:35.000 --> 03:16:41.000
TOGETHER FOR A COMMON AREA, HOW OPEN THE COMMUNITY CENTER IS TO THAT. 03:16:41.000 --> 03:16:47.000
AND I'M REALLY EXCITED ABOUT WHAT THE CITY HAS BEEN DOING, BRINGING PEOPLE
03:16:47.000 --> 03:16:52.000
TOGETHER. I STARTED FOLLOWING THIS PROCESS AND THIS HAS BEEN TALKED ABOUT FOR A
03:16:52.000 --> 03:16:55.000
VERY LONG TIME. BRINGING PEOPLE TOGETHER, ORGANIZATIONS AND COOPERATING 03:16:55.000 --> 03:17:01.000
ESPECIALLY IN CIVIC NEEDS POSSIBLY WITH
03:17:01.000 --> 03:17:07.000
STAFF AND GRANT WRITING, OTHER EFFORTS IS SUCH A SHIFT IN HOW THINGS HAVE BEEN
03:17:07.000 --> 03:17:14.000
DONE. IN SUCH A MOVE TOWARD A COOPERATIVE SPIRIT. IT'S EXCITING TO THINK ABOUT.
03:17:14.000 --> 03:17:17.000
I APPRECIATE THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT NOT JUST PRESERVING THE SHORT-TERM NEED,
03:17:17.000 --> 03:17:20.000
THE ASSET, THE IMMEDIATE USE, BUT ALSO LOOKING AT THE LONG-TERM
OPPORTUNITY TO
03:17:20.000 --> 03:17:26.000
BRING PEOPLE
03:17:26.000 --> 03:17:32.000
IN THE COMMUNITY TOGETHER IN A DEEPER WAY. THANK YOU. FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
03:17:32.000 --> 03:17:36.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, NEXT I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM, CAN YOU UNMUTE
03:17:36.000 --> 03:17:38.000
YOURSELF, PLEASE?
03:17:38.000 --> 03:17:41.000
>> THANK YOU.
03:17:41.000 --> 03:17:44.000
>> CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
03:17:44.000 --> 03:17:47.000
>> GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
03:17:47.000 --> 03:17:50.000
>> I WANT TO SUPPORT WHAT THE COMMENTOR ROBERT SAID, WHICH IS, I THINK IT'S
03:17:50.000 --> 03:17:56.000
GREAT TO INVEST IN THE BUILDING OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER, IT'S A WONDERFUL 03:17:56.000 --> 03:17:59.000
ORGANIZATION, BUT IF WE'RE GOING TO INVEST THE MONEY IN IT, WE SHOULD
LOOK AT
03:17:59.000 --> 03:18:03.000
DOING THE TEMPORARY BARRIER
03:18:03.000 --> 03:18:07.000
AND I THINK WE HAVE LOTS AND LOTS OF DIFFERENT SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 03:18:07.000 --> 03:18:13.000
AND OPPORTUNITIES WHERE YOU COULD TRAIN
03:18:13.000 --> 03:18:19.000
A GROUP OF PEOPLE AND HAVE THEM EITHER THE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS, OR OTHER
03:18:19.000 --> 03:18:24.000
FIRST RESPONDERS OR EVEN SOME OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS, 03:18:24.000 --> 03:18:30.000
OR PEOPLE WHO ARE ASSOCIATED AND LOVE THE COMMUNITY CULTURAL CENTER AND DON'T
03:18:30.000 --> 03:18:36.000
WANT TO SEE IT GET FLOODED, BUT, I THINK THAT THERE SHOULD BE AN
OPPORTUNITY
03:18:36.000 --> 03:18:39.000
TO TRAIN A GROUP OF PEOPLE AND HAVE THEM AVAILABLE IF NEEDED TO ERECT THE 03:18:39.000 --> 03:18:43.000
TEMPORARY FLOOD BARRIER,
03:18:43.000 --> 03:18:49.000
WE TYPICALLY HAVE A TWO DAY WARNING PERIOD,
03:18:49.000 --> 03:18:56.000
AND SO THAT WOULD GIVE VOLUNTEERS ENOUGH TIME TO GET IT UP AND GOING. 03:18:56.000 --> 03:18:59.000
I AGREE WITH PUBLIC WORKS THAT THEY ARE OVERBURDENED DURING FLOOD TIMES
BECAUSE
03:18:59.000 --> 03:19:05.000
THEY HAVE TO DEAL WITH OUR SYSTEM,
03:19:05.000 --> 03:19:10.000
BUT I THINK IF YOU MAKE THE INVESTMENT TO FIX THE BUILDING 03:19:10.000 --> 03:19:15.000
THAT THERE SHOULD BE A PLAN TO PROTECT IT FROM FLOODS, AND IF A TEMPORARY 03:19:15.000 --> 03:19:23.000
BARRIER IS A LOW-COST WAY TO DO IT, I DO THINK THAT THERE ARE THE
PERSONAL
03:19:23.000 --> 03:19:30.000
RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO ERECT THE BARRIER. I ALSO WANT TO SAY THAT 03:19:30.000 --> 03:19:32.000
ELEMENT LENO HIGH SCHOOL HAS A BRAND-NEW PERFORMANCE SPACE THAT HAS A 289 SEAT
03:19:32.000 --> 03:19:38.000
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER THAT
03:19:38.000 --> 03:19:44.000
INCLUDES A 2000 FOOT STAGE, A SECOND-FLOOR TECHNICAL EDGE, A LOBBY AND 03:19:44.000 --> 03:19:46.000
BACKSTAGE AREA, SO PERHAPS THAT COULD BE A SPACE THAT IS USED BY THE
COMMUNITY
03:19:46.000 --> 03:19:50.000
CULTURAL CENTER. THANK YOU.
03:19:50.000 --> 03:19:54.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, NEXT I WILL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS.
03:19:54.000 --> 03:20:00.000
>> I WANTED TO GET AN IDEA OF WHAT IT WOULD TAKE
03:20:00.000 --> 03:20:06.000
, ERIC MAY HAVE THE ANSWER TO THIS. TO ACTUALLY ERECT THE BARRIER, 03:20:06.000 --> 03:20:10.000
WHETHER YOU NEED HEAVY EQUIPMENT, HOW MUCH IT WOULD WAY IF IT WAS FULL OF 03:20:10.000 --> 03:20:15.000
WATER. I DON'T KNOW HOW HIGH IT WOULD BE, BUT, WE MAY BE UNDERESTIMATING WITH
03:20:15.000 --> 03:20:18.000
HER BOY SCOUTS AND MADE SUCH A HUGE ENTITY,
03:20:18.000 --> 03:20:23.000
AND TAKE IT DOWN AGAIN.
03:20:23.000 --> 03:20:26.000
I READ THE INFORMATION ABOUT IT BUT I'M NOT CLEAR ON WHAT THAT WOULD
ENTAIL AND
03:20:26.000 --> 03:20:32.000
WHETHER IT WOULD BE PRACTICAL OR NOT.
03:20:32.000 --> 03:20:35.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENTS. NEXT I WILL GO OUT TO ZOOM, IF
THERE'S
03:20:35.000 --> 03:20:40.000
ANYONE ON ZOOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE COMMUNITY CENTER
03:20:40.000 --> 03:20:44.000
FACILITIES ESTIMATE REPORT, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND VIRTUALLY. SEEING NONE IF
03:20:44.000 --> 03:20:47.000
THERE WAS ANYONE ELSE IN CHAMBERS. SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENT IS CLOSED. 03:20:47.000 --> 03:20:52.000
>> THANK YOU.
03:20:52.000 --> 03:21:01.000
BACK HERE AT THE DAIS FOR ANY COMMENTS. IF ANYONE HAS ANY COMMENTS. GO AHEAD.
03:21:01.000 --> 03:21:07.000
>> SO, I'VE BEEN LISTENING TO THIS FOR A LONG TIME. SINCE WE GOT THE MONEY.
03:21:07.000 --> 03:21:10.000
THE FLOOD BARRIER, I HAD HIGH HOPES AT THE BEGINNING THAT THE FLOOD
BARRIER WAS
03:21:10.000 --> 03:21:15.000
GOING TO BE THE LATEST AND GREATEST,
03:21:15.000 --> 03:21:18.000
WE STUDIED IT BACK THEN, WE KNOW THAT IT'S BIG, IT'S HEAVY, WATER FILLS AND
03:21:18.000 --> 03:21:26.000
WHAT HAPPENS TO THAT WATER WHEN IT GOES OUT?
03:21:26.000 --> 03:21:33.000
IT'S RUBBER, SO WITH THE BARLOW FLOOD THE RUBBER THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO GO INTO
03:21:33.000 --> 03:21:40.000
THE LOCKED THINGS TO PREVENT THE FLOOD DIDN'T HOLD UP OVER TIME. 03:21:40.000 --> 03:21:44.000
SO, HAVE WE BOUGHT THAT IN 2019 AND WE HAVEN'T HAD A FLOOD, WHAT WOULD BE LIKE
03:21:44.000 --> 03:21:48.000
IF WE DID NEED TO BLOW IT UP IN 2026.
03:21:48.000 --> 03:21:55.000
FOR MANY, MANY REASONS, I DON'T THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA ANY LONGER. AND WE GOT
03:21:55.000 --> 03:21:58.000
THIS MONEY AS A WINDFALL, REALLY, FOR THIS PURPOSE. I HAVE NO PROBLEM
SPENDING
03:21:58.000 --> 03:22:05.000
IT ON THE COMMUNITY CENTER,
03:22:05.000 --> 03:22:07.000
AND WE STILL HAVE ADDITIONAL MONIES LEFT ON OUR FLOOD ACCOUNT THAT WE
HAVEN'T
03:22:07.000 --> 03:22:13.000
USED. I SUPPORT THIS PLAN TONIGHT,
03:22:13.000 --> 03:22:16.000
AND THANK THE COMMUNITY CENTER FOR EVERYTHING THEY DO FOR OUR COMMUNITY.
WE
03:22:16.000 --> 03:22:23.000
HAVEN'T HAD A FLOOD SINCE 2019 AND HOPEFULLY THAT WILL HOLD. 03:22:23.000 --> 03:22:29.000
>> AND I'M JUST GOING TO SAY, OBVIOUSLY I SUPPORT THIS AND HAVING SAT ON THAT
03:22:29.000 --> 03:22:33.000
COMMITTEE WITH THE BARRIERS AND ALL OF THAT, THERE ARE MANY ISSUES AND
QUESTIONS
03:22:33.000 --> 03:22:36.000
ABOUT THE RUNOFF OF THE WATER, THE FISH AND WILDLIFE NEED TO BE INVOLVED TO
03:22:36.000 --> 03:22:43.000
FIGURE OUT WHAT HAPPENS WITH THAT RUNOFF. QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT IF THAT SITS
03:22:43.000 --> 03:22:45.000
SINCE 2019, WHAT IF THAT SITS FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS, IT HAS AN END OF
LIFE, AND
03:22:45.000 --> 03:22:49.000
THEN WE SPEND MONEY ON SOMETHING
03:22:49.000 --> 03:22:54.000
, THERE'S A SIMILAR DIFFERENT CHALLENGES. WE LOOKED AT PUTTING WALLS UP
AND THE
03:22:54.000 --> 03:22:59.000
DISCUSSION BECAME, THERE'S A GREASE TRAP IN THE PARKING LOT AND THAT
WOULD HAVE
03:22:59.000 --> 03:23:02.000
TO BE MOVED, TREES WOULD HAVE TO BE CUT DOWN. I COULD GO ON AND ON AND ON AND
03:23:02.000 --> 03:23:07.000
TELL YOU ABOUT THE DIFFERENT DISCUSSIONS AND MEANINGS OF MY LIFE THAT I HAVE
03:23:07.000 --> 03:23:10.000
SPENT ASSESSING THIS. ALL THAT TO SAY IS I'M SUPPORTIVE OF FIXING WHAT WE HAVE
03:23:10.000 --> 03:23:14.000
RIGHT NOW AND CONTINUING TO ALLOW THE GROUP TO FIGURE OUT IF THIS IS AN 03:23:14.000 --> 03:23:20.000
ALTERNATE SOLUTION IN THE FUTURE. BUT WE DO NEED TO BE
03:23:20.000 --> 03:23:24.000
GOOD LANDLORDS, AND TAKE CARE OF THESE MOISTURE ISSUES IN THAT BUILDING, I FEEL
03:23:24.000 --> 03:23:30.000
ADAMANT ABOUT THAT. THE HOLES IN THE WALLS AND THE CEILINGS. 03:23:30.000 --> 03:23:33.000
THOSE HAVE TO BE TAKEN CARE OF. I WANT TO SAY THAT PUBLICLY, IT NEEDS TO BE
03:23:33.000 --> 03:23:38.000
TAKEN CARE OF. I CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY THAT'S NOT DONE YET. 03:23:38.000 --> 03:23:42.000
I WANT TO SAY THAT PUBLICLY AND I'M HOPING THAT THAT IS BEING HEARD,
BECAUSE
03:23:42.000 --> 03:23:47.000
IT'S NOT RIGHT AND WE NEED TO BE GOOD LANDLORDS.
03:23:47.000 --> 03:23:53.000
>> I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 03:23:53.000 --> 03:23:56.000
400 SOMETHING DOLLARS WORTH OF CHANGES. AND THE LONGER-TERM VISION TO
WORK WITH
03:23:56.000 --> 03:24:01.000
ANOTHER GROUP TO FIND A SOLUTION.
03:24:01.000 --> 03:24:06.000
WHICH I THINK IS THE RECOMMENDATION.
03:24:06.000 --> 03:24:15.000
>> I'LL SECOND THAT.
03:24:15.000 --> 03:24:22.000
>> ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE,
03:24:22.000 --> 03:24:24.000
SO MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARTER, SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR MAURER, TO
ACCEPT THE
03:24:24.000 --> 03:24:27.000
REPORT AND DIRECT STAFF TO INCLUDE THE FLOOD MITIGATION REPAIRS BY
INTERACTIVE
03:24:27.000 --> 03:24:31.000
RESOURCES
03:24:31.000 --> 03:24:34.000
IN THE 26-27 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND DIRECTING STAFF TO EXPLORE AND
03:24:34.000 --> 03:24:37.000
MOVE FORWARD WITH IMPLEMENTATION FOR THE SHARED CIVIC SPACE WITH THE
SEBASTOPOL
03:24:37.000 --> 03:24:44.000
COMMENTS OR ANOTHER NONPROFIT FOR THE LONG-TERM VISION. 03:24:44.000 --> 03:24:47.000
COUNCIL MEMBER CARTER?
03:24:47.000 --> 03:24:49.000
>> YEAH.
03:24:49.000 --> 03:24:52.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER HINTON?
03:24:52.000 --> 03:24:55.000
>> AYE.
03:24:55.000 --> 03:24:57.000
>> VICE MAYOR MAURER?
03:24:57.000 --> 03:25:00.000
>> YES.
03:25:00.000 --> 03:25:03.000
>> MAYOR McLEWIS?
03:25:03.000 --> 03:25:06.000
>> YES.
03:25:06.000 --> 03:25:08.000
>> MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
03:25:08.000 --> 03:25:11.000
>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.
03:25:11.000 --> 03:25:14.000
>> SO WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ON, THANK YOU FOR STAYING FOR SO LONG. REALLY.
WE
03:25:14.000 --> 03:25:17.000
HAVE NUMBER NINE, THE BAY RUN PROGRAM. BEFORE I DO THIS ARE WE ALL OKAY? I KNOW
03:25:17.000 --> 03:25:20.000
IT'S BEEN SEVERAL HOURS. OKAY. THE BAYREN PROGRAM, THE WATER $AVE PROGRAM IS
03:25:20.000 --> 03:25:24.000
CLOSING AND BAYREN IS PROPOSING OPTIONS FOR THE CITY TO CONSIDER WITH
PROGRAM
03:25:24.000 --> 03:25:27.000
CLOSURE. I BELIEVE IS IT ALEX IS DOING THIS?
03:25:27.000 --> 03:25:34.000
TAKE IT AWAY.
03:25:34.000 --> 03:25:41.000
>> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. I'LL KEEP THIS BRIEF BUT I DON'T THINK I CAN TOP
03:25:41.000 --> 03:25:45.000
THE BOXING. SO, THIS ITEM WAS REVIEWED BY THE BUDGET COMMITTEE, AND THE 03:25:45.000 --> 03:25:49.000
ENTERPRISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.
03:25:49.000 --> 03:25:54.000
AND THE COMMENT HAD BEEN RECORDED IN THE STAFF REPORT. THAT WAS ALSO 03:25:54.000 --> 03:26:02.000
INCORPORATED THEIR FEEDBACK.
03:26:02.000 --> 03:26:08.000
SO THE CITY JOINED THIS PROGRAM IN 2022, AND FAST FORWARD TO TODAY. THIS 03:26:08.000 --> 03:26:15.000
PROGRAM IS ENDING, SO, BAYREN HAS APPROACHED THE CITY TO SETTLE THE
REMAINING
03:26:15.000 --> 03:26:18.000
CAPITAL INVESTMENT BALANCE OF $30,020.57.
03:26:18.000 --> 03:26:21.000
FOR A REDUCED AMOUNT OF
03:26:21.000 --> 03:26:28.000
$13,141.23.
03:26:28.000 --> 03:26:30.000
STAFF IS PRESENTING TO THE CITY COUNCIL TWO OPTIONS. THE FIRST OPTION IS TO
03:26:30.000 --> 03:26:38.000
APPROVE THE BAYREN PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
03:26:38.000 --> 03:26:44.000
AND RESOLVE THE CITY OUTSTANDING CAPITAL OBLIGATION OF $13,141.23. THIS AMOUNT
03:26:44.000 --> 03:26:48.000
MAY BE PAID ENTIRELY FROM THE WATERFRONT, AND ULTIMATELY THE COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE
03:26:48.000 --> 03:26:54.000
TO PAY $7409.94 FROM THE GENERAL FUND,
03:26:54.000 --> 03:27:00.000
AND THE BALANCE FROM THE WATERFRONT HOLDING ACCOUNT. OPTION TWO IS TO
MAINTAIN
03:27:00.000 --> 03:27:03.000
THE EXISTING CHARGES TO PARTICIPATING CUSTOMERS
03:27:03.000 --> 03:27:09.000
,
03:27:09.000 --> 03:27:15.000
PAY A FULL OUTSTANDING BALANCE OF 30,000, CONTINUE COLLECTING 03:27:15.000 --> 03:27:19.000
THE CHARGE TO REIMBURSE THE CITY AND ASSUME ONGOING RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY
03:27:19.000 --> 03:27:22.000
FUTURE REPAIRS. WITH THAT SUMMARIZED STAFF REPORT, I WILL PAUSE NOW FOR 03:27:22.000 --> 03:27:25.000
QUESTIONS. THANK YOU.
03:27:25.000 --> 03:27:32.000
>> THANK YOU, GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER HINTON.
03:27:32.000 --> 03:27:35.000
>> I HAVE A QUESTION, ON THE BOTTOM OF PAGE TWO, I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW NINE
03:27:35.000 --> 03:27:40.000
ACCOUNTS WERE NOT CHARGED
03:27:40.000 --> 03:27:43.000
TOTALING $4663.38 IN UNBILLED COSTS.
03:27:43.000 --> 03:27:49.000
I GET AN EXPLANATION
03:27:49.000 --> 03:27:52.000
OF HOW THE CITY HAS A PROGRAM AND WE DID NOT BILL NINE CUSTOMERS THAT
SIGN UP
03:27:52.000 --> 03:27:55.000
FOR IT.
03:27:55.000 --> 03:28:00.000
>> SO THERE'S AN OVERSIGHT.
03:28:00.000 --> 03:28:07.000
NOT EVERYBODY COME ON BOARD AT ONCE, AND CITY STAFF WAS HAVING 03:28:07.000 --> 03:28:10.000
THE CHANGE OUT, SO THERE'S A LOT OF PROJECTS HAPPENED, AND IT, THOSE NINE 03:28:10.000 --> 03:28:18.000
ACCOUNT WAS NOT BILLED.
03:28:18.000 --> 03:28:23.000
>> I DON'T SUPPOSE DUE TO THE CONTRACT THEY SIGNED THAT WE COULD DO A QUICK
03:28:23.000 --> 03:28:26.000
BILL NOW BEFORE WE SETTLE THIS THING. THEY GOT FREE TOILETS AND UPGRADES IN
03:28:26.000 --> 03:28:29.000
THEIR HOME AND THEY HAVEN'T PAID A DIME. I'VE GOT TO SAY PUBLICLY, I AM SO
03:28:29.000 --> 03:28:34.000
DISAPPOINTED THAT THIS IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED.
03:28:34.000 --> 03:28:38.000
I WISH I HAD SIGNED UP FOR THAT PROGRAM SO I COULD USE SOME UPGRADED
TOILETS
03:28:38.000 --> 03:28:43.000
FOR FREE.
03:28:43.000 --> 03:28:49.000
>> CAN I ASK A QUESTION? WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT? THE UNBILLED? 03:28:49.000 --> 03:28:52.000
>> THE ACCOUNT --
03:28:52.000 --> 03:28:55.000
>> FROM CITY STAFF, WHAT DEPARTMENT, WHO DOES THAT BUILDING? 03:28:55.000 --> 03:28:58.000
>> THAT WOULD BE THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES. 03:28:58.000 --> 03:29:02.000
>> OKAY.
03:29:02.000 --> 03:29:11.000
ANYONE ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS?
03:29:11.000 --> 03:29:16.000
I HAVE A LOT OF COMMENTS, BUT GO AHEAD.
03:29:16.000 --> 03:29:20.000
>> I WANT TO MAKE A BRIEF COMMENT THAT THE BUDGET COMMITTEE LOOKED AT THIS.
03:29:20.000 --> 03:29:23.000
>> CAN'T HEAR YOU. THAT'S A COMMENT, DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION? 03:29:23.000 --> 03:29:34.000
>> YOU HAVE TO WAIT TILL WE'RE, WE'RE IN QUESTION.
03:29:34.000 --> 03:29:41.000
>> I'D JUST LIKE TO VERIFY THIS WITH THE ATTORNEY. THAT, WE HAD DIRECTED 03:29:41.000 --> 03:29:49.000
, WE ASKED YOU TO LOOK INTO THIS ISSUE REGARDING THE CITY'S LIABILITY. 03:29:49.000 --> 03:29:52.000
SO, COULD YOU SAY A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT? I THINK THAT'S A KEY ISSUE,
HERE, IS
03:29:52.000 --> 03:29:57.000
IF WE DON'T TAKE THIS
03:29:57.000 --> 03:30:01.000
BUYOUT FROM BAYREN, THEN WE WOULD BE LIABLE
03:30:01.000 --> 03:30:07.000
FOR ANY REPAIRS, ET CETERA.
03:30:07.000 --> 03:30:13.000
>> SO, WE'RE NOT LIABLE FOR REPAIRS, BUT IN OUR AGREEMENT, 03:30:13.000 --> 03:30:18.000
UNDER THE AGREEMENTS, THE PROPERTY OWNERS SIGNED, IF SOMETHING HAPPENS WITH
03:30:18.000 --> 03:30:24.000
THE TOILET OR SINK OR WHATEVER,
03:30:24.000 --> 03:30:26.000
AND WE DON'T FIX IT, THEN WE CAN NO LONGER CHARGE THEM, THEY STOP HAVING TO
03:30:26.000 --> 03:30:37.000
MAKE THEIR REPAYMENTS.
03:30:37.000 --> 03:30:40.000
>> I THOUGHT THAT THE CITY WOULD THEN GO ON TO PRIVATE PROPERTY AND DEAL WITH
03:30:40.000 --> 03:30:45.000
THIS. ARE YOU SAYING WE DON'T HAVE TO DO THAT?
03:30:45.000 --> 03:30:49.000
>> WE HAVE TO MAKE THAT CORRECTION IF WE WANT TO CONTINUE CHARGING THEM. 03:30:49.000 --> 03:30:53.000
>> IT'S LIKE AN ONGOING POTENTIAL PROBLEM. THAT'S THE PROBLEM. 03:30:53.000 --> 03:31:01.000
>> CORRECT. IF WE WANT TO KEEP CHARGING THEM,
03:31:01.000 --> 03:31:06.000
ASSUMING SOMETHING HAPPENS. IT MAY NOT HAPPEN, SIX YEARS DOWN THE ROAD. 03:31:06.000 --> 03:31:09.000
THERE MAY BE A PROBLEM AND WE MIGHT SAY, WE'RE NOT FIXING IT. WE'RE GOING TO
03:31:09.000 --> 03:31:12.000
START CHARGING YOU NOW.
03:31:12.000 --> 03:31:19.000
>> GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER HINTON.
03:31:19.000 --> 03:31:26.000
>> SO WE USED CONTRACTORS, CONTRACTORS USED FOR THIS WORK. 03:31:26.000 --> 03:31:31.000
SO WHERE'S THE CONTRACTOR IN THAT? THE CONTRACTOR INSTALLED THE WORK. IS THE
03:31:31.000 --> 03:31:37.000
CONTRACTOR HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO GO BACK IF THERE WERE A PROBLEM TO MAKE THE
03:31:37.000 --> 03:31:42.000
WORK RIGHT? OR THE CITY, WE DON'T INSTALL TOILETS.
03:31:42.000 --> 03:31:44.000
>> I DON'T HAVE COPIES OF THOSE AGREEMENTS. OF WHAT WE MIGHT SAY, AND
THESE ARE
03:31:44.000 --> 03:31:51.000
TEMPLATE AGREEMENTS FROM THE BAYREN PROGRAM.
03:31:51.000 --> 03:31:55.000
THAT PROVIDED HOW THAT REPAYMENT WOULD WORK.
03:31:55.000 --> 03:32:02.000
>> SO THEY PROVIDED THE CONTRACTORS THROUGH BAYREN, THE CITY 03:32:02.000 --> 03:32:05.000
WAS OUT AT THAT POINT? BUT IF WE WANTED TO CONTINUE CHARGING, 03:32:05.000 --> 03:32:12.000
THE CUSTOMERS, IF WE WANTED
03:32:12.000 --> 03:32:16.000
TO NOT DO THIS PROGRAM, NOT CLOSE IT OUT. AND LET'S SAY A TOILET HAD A 03:32:16.000 --> 03:32:22.000
MALFUNCTION OR SOMETHING, IF WE WANTED TO KEEP REPAIRING THAT WE WOULD BE 03:32:22.000 --> 03:32:25.000
RESPONSIBLE FOR GOING IN OR HIRING A CONTRACTOR TO GO IN AND DO THAT. WE
CAN GET
03:32:25.000 --> 03:32:30.000
CLARIFICATION BECAUSE
03:32:30.000 --> 03:32:33.000
MARY IS ON THE LINE RIGHT NOW, WE CAN ASK HER FOR CLARIFICATION. BUT THAT IS MY
03:32:33.000 --> 03:32:36.000
UNDERSTANDING.
03:32:36.000 --> 03:32:44.000
>> IF SHE'S ON THE LINE.
03:32:44.000 --> 03:32:57.000
>> I'M GOING TO UNMUTE YOU IF YOU CAN PROVIDE SOME CLARITY ON THIS. 03:32:57.000 --> 03:33:00.000
CAN YOU UNMUTE? THERE YOU GO. JANE HAS ALSO BEEN ON THE MEETINGS WITH US AS
03:33:00.000 --> 03:33:04.000
WELL.
03:33:04.000 --> 03:33:07.000
JANE, CAN YOU HEAR IS OKAY?
03:33:07.000 --> 03:33:09.000
>> CAN YOU HEAR ME?
03:33:09.000 --> 03:33:13.000
>> WE CAN HEAR YOU.
03:33:13.000 --> 03:33:16.000
>> OKAY, THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS. I'M THE PORTFOLIO 03:33:16.000 --> 03:33:19.000
ADMINISTRATOR, AND TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, WITH THE PROGRAM, BAYREN
RUNNING THE
03:33:19.000 --> 03:33:25.000
WATER UPGRADES SAVE PROGRAM, WE HIGHER
03:33:25.000 --> 03:33:29.000
AN IMPLEMENTOR WHICH THEN SUPPLIED THE CONTRACTORS THAT DID THE
INSTALLATIONS
03:33:29.000 --> 03:33:34.000
FOR THE VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS, THE WATER AND ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS. 03:33:34.000 --> 03:33:39.000
WITH THAT,
03:33:39.000 --> 03:33:44.000
THE RESIDENTS SIGNED A PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT THAT DETAILED OUT 03:33:44.000 --> 03:33:48.000
ALL OF THE VARIOUS PROVISIONS AND WHAT HAVE YOU. THE CONTRACTOR WAS
PROVIDED
03:33:48.000 --> 03:33:55.000
THROUGH BAYREN. I THINK THAT ANSWERS THE QUESTION.
03:33:55.000 --> 03:33:58.000
>> THE CONTRACTOR WOULD HAVE NO OBLIGATION IF SOMETHING WENT WRONG TO GO BACK
03:33:58.000 --> 03:34:01.000
AND REPAIR IT?
03:34:01.000 --> 03:34:05.000
>> AT THAT POINT IN TIME BECAUSE WE HAVE TERMINATED THE PROGRAM, WE HAVE SINCE
03:34:05.000 --> 03:34:13.000
TERMINATED THE AGREEMENT WITH THE IMPLEMENTOR SINCE WE ARE NO LONGER
PROVIDING
03:34:13.000 --> 03:34:16.000
THE SERVICES ANY LONGER. UP UNTIL, UP UNTIL THE PROGRAM WAS CLOSED. YES, IF
03:34:16.000 --> 03:34:19.000
THERE HAD BEEN SOME KIND OF MALFUNCTION OR REPAIR NEEDED 03:34:19.000 --> 03:34:24.000
ASIDE FROM TYPICAL MAINTENANCE, THAT'S
03:34:24.000 --> 03:34:30.000
TOTALLY SEPARATE. IF SOMETHING HAD MALFUNCTIONED THEN WE WOULD SEND THE 03:34:30.000 --> 03:34:33.000
CONTRACTOR BACK IN TO ASSESS THAT, AND MAKE GOOD OF WHAT WAS NEEDED IF 03:34:33.000 --> 03:34:35.000
NECESSARY.
03:34:35.000 --> 03:34:45.000
>> THANK YOU.
03:34:45.000 --> 03:34:49.000
>> I'VE READ THIS A COUPLE TIMES. CAN YOU HELP ME TO UNDERSTAND THIS? WE HAVE
03:34:49.000 --> 03:34:55.000
THAT AMOUNT THAT WAS UNBILLED, BUT THESE OTHER AMOUNTS, I'M TRYING TO
LOOK AT
03:34:55.000 --> 03:35:00.000
ALL THE DIFFERENT AMOUNTS, HERE. HOW IS IT THAT WE'VE NOT BEEN ABLE, CAN
SOMEONE
03:35:00.000 --> 03:35:03.000
EXPLAIN TO ME THESE DIFFERENT AMOUNTS, AND WHY IT IS THAT, I THINK IT'S 03:35:03.000 --> 03:35:08.000
OUTRAGEOUS THAT
03:35:08.000 --> 03:35:12.000
WE WOULD MISS BILLING. IT'S A TOTAL DISREGARD FOR ALL THE PEOPLE HERE WHO PAY
03:35:12.000 --> 03:35:15.000
THIS MONEY EVERY DAY. YET NOW WE WANT TO ABSORB THIS. THE QUESTION I
HAVE, IT'S
03:35:15.000 --> 03:35:20.000
JUST ABOUT THE DIFFERENT AMOUNTS HERE.
03:35:20.000 --> 03:35:30.000
WE HAVE UNBILLED REVENUE, AND THE OTHER AMOUNTS BEING ASKED TO BASICALLY WAIVE,
03:35:30.000 --> 03:35:33.000
WHERE DID THOSE COME FROM? WHY CAN'T WE GET THAT MONEY BACK? I DON'T KNOW WHO
03:35:33.000 --> 03:35:39.000
CAN ANSWER THAT.
03:35:39.000 --> 03:35:42.000
>> CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING RIGHT NOW, I DON'T HAVE THE
03:35:42.000 --> 03:35:46.000
REPORT IN FRONT OF ME, WE HAVE THAT $30,000 IN OUTSTANDING. BAYREN
CONTRACTED
03:35:46.000 --> 03:35:52.000
US, AND WE NEGOTIATED,
03:35:52.000 --> 03:35:57.000
PRETTY MUCH IT'S A SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATION, THEY ARE REDUCING THEIR
REQUEST
03:35:57.000 --> 03:36:03.000
TO, I THINK IT'S 13,000. 5000, WE STILL HAVE
03:36:03.000 --> 03:36:06.000
IN A SAVINGS ACCOUNT BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT SENT THAT MONEY YET TO BAYREN.
WE HAVE
03:36:06.000 --> 03:36:09.000
5000 STILL SITTING OUT THERE.
03:36:09.000 --> 03:36:15.000
SO THERE'S 7000
03:36:15.000 --> 03:36:20.000
AND I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT AMOUNT IN FRONT OF ME BUT 7000 03:36:20.000 --> 03:36:24.000
THAT IS OUTSTANDING THAT WE NEED TO EITHER PAY FROM THE ENTERPRISE FUND OR THE
03:36:24.000 --> 03:36:31.000
GENERAL FUND, SO, BAYREN IS WILLING TO SETTLE THAT 30,000 FOR REDUCED
RATE OF
03:36:31.000 --> 03:36:34.000
13,000. BUT WE CAN NO LONGER BILL THOSE RESIDENTS BY DOING THIS. WE ARE
CLOSING
03:36:34.000 --> 03:36:37.000
OUT THAT ACCOUNT, AND CAN NO LONGER
03:36:37.000 --> 03:36:41.000
BILL.
03:36:41.000 --> 03:36:46.000
>> I UNDERSTAND, I'M WONDERING, WHAT'S TO PREVENT US FROM BUILDING THESE PEOPLE?
03:36:46.000 --> 03:36:54.000
>> WE COULD CONTINUE TO BILL THEM. AND
03:36:54.000 --> 03:36:59.000
WE COULD PAY BAYREN THE $30,000 NOW. AND CONTINUE RATHER THAN THE 13 AND 03:36:59.000 --> 03:37:02.000
CONTINUE TO BUILD THOSE PEOPLE AND COLLECT THAT 30,000 TO REIMBURSE
OURSELVES
03:37:02.000 --> 03:37:08.000
OVER THE NEXT SEVEN YEARS.
03:37:08.000 --> 03:37:12.000
>> WHAT IS THE LIKELIHOOD THAT YOU FEEL LIKE YOU'D GET IT BACK? 03:37:12.000 --> 03:37:16.000
>> IF THEY'RE GOING OUT OF BUSINESS, WHY WOULD WE HAVE $30,000 DUE TO THEM?
03:37:16.000 --> 03:37:23.000
>> THAT'S WHAT THE AGREEMENT SAYS.
03:37:23.000 --> 03:37:29.000
THE OUTSTANDING AMOUNT IS WHAT'S NOT BEEN BILLED. NOT PAID BY CUSTOMERS, IS
03:37:29.000 --> 03:37:36.000
THAT CORRECT? I'M TRYING TO MAKE SURE I FULLY UNDERSTAND THAT, AND IT ALL SEEMS
03:37:36.000 --> 03:37:41.000
OUTRAGEOUS TO ME. I HAVE A LOT OF COMMENTS LATER. I'M VERY ANGRY ABOUT THIS.
03:37:41.000 --> 03:37:44.000
>> OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
03:37:44.000 --> 03:37:50.000
ALL RIGHT, PUBLIC COMMENT?
03:37:50.000 --> 03:37:54.000
>> THANK YOU, THIS IS PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSEOUT
03:37:54.000 --> 03:37:57.000
OF THE BAYREN AND RECOMMENDATIONS MOVING FORWARD, IF YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A 03:37:57.000 --> 03:38:01.000
PUBLIC COMMENT, IN CHAMBERS FIRST, ALL OF THERE.
03:38:01.000 --> 03:38:05.000
>> THE ENTERPRISE WITH CARTER DISCUSSED THIS AT THE LAST MEETING, WE
AGREED THAT
03:38:05.000 --> 03:38:12.000
ALL THE MEMBERS AGREED THAT THEY SHOULD BE PAID OFF 13,000, 03:38:12.000 --> 03:38:16.000
AND PUT THIS BEHIND US. IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE TO TRY AND COLLECT THE MONEY. 03:38:16.000 --> 03:38:21.000
HOW WE GOT INTO THIS IN 2021 I DON'T REMEMBER THE MEETING, BUT IT SEEMS 03:38:21.000 --> 03:38:26.000
ABSOLUTELY NUTS TO ME THAT WE DID THIS. PRESUMABLY A FEW OF THE PEOPLE
WHO GOT
03:38:26.000 --> 03:38:33.000
THE FREE TOILETS AND THE SUBSIDIZED ONES THAT MOVED OUT, AND STOPPED PAYING.
03:38:33.000 --> 03:38:40.000
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE PEOPLE WHO TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THIS IN JANUARY 2021 UNTIL
03:38:40.000 --> 03:38:45.000
NOW, STILL ACTUALLY LIVE IN THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL? HUGE MISTAKE BY THE
COUNCIL
03:38:45.000 --> 03:38:48.000
BACK THEN TO EMBARK ON THIS, IT'S INCREDIBLE HOW QUICKLY, IT'S A LESSON HOW
03:38:48.000 --> 03:38:52.000
QUICKLY THESE ENTITIES
03:38:52.000 --> 03:38:58.000
, YOU ENTER AN AGREEMENT AND THEN THEY DISAPPEAR.
03:38:58.000 --> 03:39:02.000
THEY GO BANKRUPT, LEAVING THE CITY HOLDING THE BAG. MY POINT 03:39:02.000 --> 03:39:06.000
IS THE ENTERPRISE COMMITTEE SAID EVERYBODY AGREES
03:39:06.000 --> 03:39:10.000
JUST PAY IT OFF AND MOVE ON, THANK YOU.
03:39:10.000 --> 03:39:13.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? 03:39:13.000 --> 03:39:17.000
>> I'M UNMUTED.
03:39:17.000 --> 03:39:21.000
>> GO AHEAD WITH YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT.
03:39:21.000 --> 03:39:28.000
>> I WANT TO FOLLOW UP WITH, AS TO WHAT OLIVER SAID. I'M ON THE
ENTERPRISE
03:39:28.000 --> 03:39:34.000
COMMITTEE, WE AGREED THAT IT SHOULD BE PAID IN FULL AND BY THE GENERAL FUND. I
03:39:34.000 --> 03:39:38.000
WILL GO ON WITH MY PUBLIC COMMENT. THEY RUN IS A PROGRAM THAT ALLOWED
INDIVIDUAL
03:39:38.000 --> 03:39:44.000
HOMEOWNERS TO UPGRADE THEIR TOILETS AND OTHER FIXTURES WITH SPREAD
PAYMENT PLAN
03:39:44.000 --> 03:39:48.000
THAT WAS ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL VIA THE WATER AND SEWER BILL.
03:39:48.000 --> 03:39:54.000
THE COUNCIL DECIDED TO OFFER THIS TO RESIDENTS, 54 HOMEOWNERS PARTICIPATED.
03:39:54.000 --> 03:40:00.000
THE CITY'S FINANCE PROGRAM FAILED TO BILL NINE PEOPLE.
03:40:00.000 --> 03:40:04.000
NOW, BAYREN IS CLOSING AND THE CITY IS LEFT WITH A BALANCE TO PAY. AS A PERSON
03:40:04.000 --> 03:40:08.000
WHO PAYS HIGH WATER BILLS, I DO NOT WANT TO SUBSIDIZE A NEW TOILET OR SHOWER
03:40:08.000 --> 03:40:12.000
HEAD FOR ANOTHER HOMEOWNER. MY WATER BILL SHOULD BE GOING TOWARD
EARTHQUAKE
03:40:12.000 --> 03:40:17.000
PROOFING OUR WATER TANKS WHICH ARE CURRENTLY NOT SECURE, 03:40:17.000 --> 03:40:23.000
MY SEWER BILL SHOULD GO TOWARD REPLACING CLAY PIPES, WHICH TAKE ON
RAINWATER
03:40:23.000 --> 03:40:26.000
AND CAUSE HUGE INCREASES IN PROCESSING EXPENSES, THE CITY SHOULD FIRST TRY TO
03:40:26.000 --> 03:40:30.000
COLLECT THE BALANCES
03:40:30.000 --> 03:40:37.000
, REDUCED OR OTHERWISE FROM THE EXISTING 54 CUSTOMERS. THE HOMEOWNERS
SHOULD BE
03:40:37.000 --> 03:40:40.000
HAPPY TO PAY A REDUCED BILL AS THEY GOT NEW FIXTURES AND GOT TO PAY THEM OFF
03:40:40.000 --> 03:40:44.000
OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS AND COULD NOW BE OFFERED A REDUCED BILL.
SHOULDN'T THE
03:40:44.000 --> 03:40:50.000
PEOPLE WHO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS PAY THE BILL?
03:40:50.000 --> 03:40:53.000
IF THEY DON'T WANT TO PAY THEM COUNCIL NEEDS TO PAY THE BALANCE FROM THE 03:40:53.000 --> 03:40:56.000
GENERAL FUND. WATER AND SEWER RATEPAYERS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS DECISION.
03:40:56.000 --> 03:41:02.000
THE MONEY WENT TOWARD PRIVATE RESIDENCES.
03:41:02.000 --> 03:41:07.000
AS THE PROJECT BENEFITED LESS THAN 2% OF RATEPAYERS, THERE'S NO REASON 03:41:07.000 --> 03:41:10.000
WHATSOEVER THAT I OR A SMALL BUSINESS OR THE SENIOR CENTER OR SUNRIDGE 03:41:10.000 --> 03:41:13.000
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OR ANY OTHER RATEPAYER SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH THE
EXPENSE OF
03:41:13.000 --> 03:41:17.000
SOMEONE'S NEW TOILET.
03:41:17.000 --> 03:41:21.000
WHEN YOU DISCUSS WATER AND SEWER FINANCES, YOU ARE DISCUSSING THE
FINANCES OF
03:41:21.000 --> 03:41:24.000
EVERY SINGLE RESIDENT, BUSINESS, AND INSTITUTION IN SEBASTOPOL. 03:41:24.000 --> 03:41:27.000
>> THAT'S TWO MINUTES.
03:41:27.000 --> 03:41:30.000
>> THANK YOU.
03:41:30.000 --> 03:41:32.000
>> NEXT I WILL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS, IF THERE'S ANYONE IN CHAMBERS.
SEEING
03:41:32.000 --> 03:41:37.000
NOT I WILL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM.
03:41:37.000 --> 03:41:41.000
STEVE, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE?
03:41:41.000 --> 03:41:44.000
>> YES, THANK YOU.
03:41:44.000 --> 03:41:49.000
>> GO AHEAD WITH YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT.
03:41:49.000 --> 03:41:55.000
>> IT'S REALLY A SHAME, LOOKING BACK ON THIS, I THINK
03:41:55.000 --> 03:42:01.000
HINTON WAS THE ONLY COUNCIL MEMBER TO VOTE AGAINST THIS IDEA AT THE TIME, AND
03:42:01.000 --> 03:42:04.000
IT SHOULD BE A LESSON THAT WE REALLY NEED TO TRY TO KEEP THINGS SIMPLE.
THIS
03:42:04.000 --> 03:42:11.000
PROGRAM WAS NOT SIMPLE.
03:42:11.000 --> 03:42:16.000
IT DIDN'T HAVE THE UPTAKE THAT WE HOPED IT WOULD. AT THE SAME TIME, 03:42:16.000 --> 03:42:19.000
EVERY OTHER CITY IN SONOMA COUNTY HAS INCENTIVES
03:42:19.000 --> 03:42:22.000
TO LOWER YOUR WATER CONSUMPTION
03:42:22.000 --> 03:42:29.000
. ALL THE CITIES HAVE INCENTIVES
03:42:29.000 --> 03:42:34.000
FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY CLOSE WASHERS. THE CITY OF SONOMA GIVES AWAY FREE 03:42:34.000 --> 03:42:39.000
SHOWERHEADS, FREE SINK AERATORS.
03:42:39.000 --> 03:42:45.000
AND MANY OF THE OTHER CITIES HAVE SIMILAR PROGRAMS.
03:42:45.000 --> 03:42:48.000
I'M SURE MANY OF THE COUNCILMEMBERS ARE EVEN AWARE THAT THE CITY OF
SEBASTOPOL
03:42:48.000 --> 03:42:55.000
HAS HAD A SEPARATE PROGRAM
03:42:55.000 --> 03:42:59.000
OF INCENTIVES FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY TOILETS UP TO $150. IT'S VERY OBSCURE 03:42:59.000 --> 03:43:07.000
, THE LIST OF APPROVED TOILETS ENDS UP
03:43:07.000 --> 03:43:12.000
IN A DEAD LINK. I THINK WE DO HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO HELP REDUCE OUR WATER 03:43:12.000 --> 03:43:18.000
CONSUMPTION. WE END UP WITH LESS IMPACT ON OUR SEWERS, AND OUR RATEPAYERS CAN
03:43:18.000 --> 03:43:22.000
END UP HAVING LOWER BILLS. WE DON'T NEED A COMPLICATED PROGRAM LIKE THIS WAS. WE
03:43:22.000 --> 03:43:28.000
CAN HAVE SOMETHING CHEAP, LIKE FREE SHOWERHEADS AVAILABLE 03:43:28.000 --> 03:43:33.000
AT CITY HALL, LIKE THE CITY OF SONOMA DOES. I WANT THE COUNCILMEMBERS 03:43:33.000 --> 03:43:40.000
, WE NEED TO REFLECT ON THE MISTAKE THAT WAS MADE,
03:43:40.000 --> 03:43:43.000
WE WENT FOR A COMPLEX PROGRAM, BUT LET'S SEE WHAT WE CAN DO ON A SIMPLE LEVEL
03:43:43.000 --> 03:43:48.000
AND STILL IMPROVE OUR WATER EFFICIENCY.
03:43:48.000 --> 03:43:51.000
THANK YOU.
03:43:51.000 --> 03:43:54.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT I WILL GO TO ROBERT, CAN YOU UNMUTE
03:43:54.000 --> 03:43:58.000
YOURSELF, PLEASE?
03:43:58.000 --> 03:44:00.000
>> YES.
03:44:00.000 --> 03:44:03.000
>> CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
03:44:03.000 --> 03:44:06.000
>> I CAN.
03:44:06.000 --> 03:44:09.000
>> GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
03:44:09.000 --> 03:44:14.000
>> SEVERAL PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY MADE THE MOST IMPORTANT POINTS IN TERMS OF THE
03:44:14.000 --> 03:44:17.000
COMMENT AROUND THE LESSONS LEARNED. ONE OF THE THINGS WE SHOULD PROBABLY LEARN
03:44:17.000 --> 03:44:22.000
IS THAT ANY TIME SOMEBODY COMES TO US WITH A GREAT IDEA AND WE'RE THE
FIRST CITY
03:44:22.000 --> 03:44:31.000
TO TRY TO ADOPT IT, WE SHOULD RUN LIKE CRAZY. TESLA
03:44:31.000 --> 03:44:35.000
IS A LEADER, THEY GET OUT IN FRONT OF STUFF. IF YOU FOLLOW TESLA STOCK IT GOES
03:44:35.000 --> 03:44:39.000
UP AND DOWN LIKE CRAZY, THEY LOSE MONEY LIKE CRAZY BUT THEY HAVE DEEP
POCKETS,
03:44:39.000 --> 03:44:44.000
GENERAL MOTORS IS A SLOW ADOPTER, OR EARLY FOLLOWER, SO, THEY LOOK FOR THE
03:44:44.000 --> 03:44:47.000
THINGS THAT WORK AND THAT'S WHAT THEY ADOPT. APPLE DOES THE SAME THING,
IS WHAT
03:44:47.000 --> 03:44:51.000
MAKES THEM SUCCESSFUL, THEY DON'T TAKE UNNECESSARY RISKS. SEBASTOPOL
DOESN'T
03:44:51.000 --> 03:44:57.000
HAVE DEEP POCKETS. YOU'RE GOING TO BE IN DEFICIT AND OUT OF MONEY IN FIVE YEARS.
03:44:57.000 --> 03:45:03.000
BANKRUPT IN FIVE YEARS BASED ON THE CURRENT BUDGET FORECAST. YOU CAN'T TAKE
03:45:03.000 --> 03:45:07.000
THESE KINDS OF RISK. SEBASTOPOL WAS THE FIRST CITY IN THE BAY AREA TO GET INTO
03:45:07.000 --> 03:45:15.000
THIS PROGRAM. HOW WE GOT THERE I HAVE NO IDEA.
03:45:15.000 --> 03:45:18.000
THE IDEA OF SAVING MONEY, SAVING MONEY IS GREAT BUT WE SIT ON AN AQUIFER THAT
03:45:18.000 --> 03:45:22.000
DOESN'T EVER GO DOWN, WE DON'T HAVE A WATER SHORTAGE PROBLEM IN SEBASTOPOL. BUT
03:45:22.000 --> 03:45:28.000
THE IDEA THAT THE LAST COMMENTOR SAID THAT PEOPLE SAVE MONEY IF THEY USE LESS
03:45:28.000 --> 03:45:32.000
WATER, THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN HERE. 90% OF THE COST OF WHAT YOU PAY IS FIXED COST.
03:45:32.000 --> 03:45:37.000
IF THE WATER USAGE GOES DOWN, THE RATES HAVE TO KEEP GOING UP TO COVER THOSE
03:45:37.000 --> 03:45:40.000
FIXED COSTS. THOSE ARE MY COMMENTS, HOPEFULLY WE LEARN, THANKS. 03:45:40.000 --> 03:45:46.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT.
03:45:46.000 --> 03:45:50.000
I WILL COME INTO CHAMBERS IF THERE'S ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE
TO MAKE
03:45:50.000 --> 03:45:53.000
A PUBLIC COMMENT, SEEING THAT I WILL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. MARY, CAN YOU UNMUTE
03:45:53.000 --> 03:45:58.000
YOURSELF, PLEASE?
03:45:58.000 --> 03:46:03.000
>> MY NAME IS MARY MY HOUSE, I AM PART OF THE ENTERPRISE FUND OVERSIGHT 03:46:03.000 --> 03:46:08.000
COMMITTEE. I WANT TO PARALLEL WHAT KATE AND OLIVER HAVE BEEN SAYING, WE
HAVE ALL
03:46:08.000 --> 03:46:11.000
AGREED THAT THESE FUNDS THAT
03:46:11.000 --> 03:46:17.000
, TO PAY BAYREN, WHICH,
03:46:17.000 --> 03:46:26.000
WE ALL ALSO AGREE, WE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD FROM IT,
03:46:26.000 --> 03:46:32.000
TO PAY FROM FUNDS WITHIN THE GENERAL FUND, I WANT TO EMPHASIZE THE
SEPARATION
03:46:32.000 --> 03:46:38.000
OF THE DECISION TO PAY BAYREN FOR THE FUNDS TO BE NOT
03:46:38.000 --> 03:46:41.000
TAKEN FROM THE WATER, SEWAGE FUNDS, BUT FROM THE GENERAL, THAT'S REALLY 03:46:41.000 --> 03:46:52.000
IMPORTANT TO HIGHLIGHT.
03:46:52.000 --> 03:46:55.000
AND I THINK THIS IS JUST A HUGE MESS, THAT HAS A LOT OF LONG-TERM
SOLUTIONS
03:46:55.000 --> 03:47:05.000
THAT ARE JUST NOT FEASIBLE.
03:47:05.000 --> 03:47:09.000
AND TO PAY THE AMOUNT THROUGH THE GENERAL FUNDS AND MOVE ON. AND HAVE
THIS BE A
03:47:09.000 --> 03:47:12.000
LESSON LEARNED AND I HOPE THAT THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT IS LEARNING A LOT OF
03:47:12.000 --> 03:47:18.000
LESSONS HERE, TOO AND THANKFULLY
03:47:18.000 --> 03:47:22.000
THIS IS, ON A RELATIVELY SMALL SCALE COMPARED TO WHAT IT COULD BE. I
THINK THE
03:47:22.000 --> 03:47:29.000
LAST THING I WANT TO SAY IS THAT THE LARGER CONVERSATION HERE 03:47:29.000 --> 03:47:32.000
IS NOT ONLY IS THIS A MESSY PROGRAM BUT, THE WATER AND SEWAGE FUNDS AND THE
03:47:32.000 --> 03:47:39.000
USAGE WITHIN THE CITY,
03:47:39.000 --> 03:47:45.000
AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE, THAT IS THE BIGGEST CONVERSATION TO HIGHLIGHT, I WOULD
03:47:45.000 --> 03:47:49.000
SAY. AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY. THANK YOU.
03:47:49.000 --> 03:47:52.000
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT I WILL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS.
03:47:52.000 --> 03:47:57.000
SEEING NONE I WILL GO BACK OUT
03:47:57.000 --> 03:48:01.000
TO ZOOM, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF? CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER? 03:48:01.000 --> 03:48:05.000
>> I NEVER TAKE LONG. EARLIER IN THIS, I THINK
03:48:05.000 --> 03:48:11.000
MESA SAID SOMETHING ABOUT IT,
03:48:11.000 --> 03:48:14.000
WE ALMOST GOT TO WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS. AND I'D LIKE TO KNOW, WHO IS
03:48:14.000 --> 03:48:19.000
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE UNBILLED?
03:48:19.000 --> 03:48:26.000
IS THAT ANNA? ANNA, IF IT IS,
03:48:26.000 --> 03:48:30.000
HOW ABOUT YOU COP TO IT? TELL US YOU'RE SORRY AND WE GO ON. THAT'S MY PUBLIC
03:48:30.000 --> 03:48:33.000
COMMENT. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT I WILL COME BACK INTO 03:48:33.000 --> 03:48:41.000
CHAMBERS IF THERE'S ANYONE IN CHAMBERS. SEEING NONE.
03:48:41.000 --> 03:48:44.000
I WILL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM, IF THERE'S ANYONE ON ZOOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A
03:48:44.000 --> 03:48:50.000
PUBLIC COMMENT PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND VIRTUALLY. SEEING NONE, PUBLIC
COMMENT IS
03:48:50.000 --> 03:48:56.000
CLOSED. THANK YOU, WE'RE BACK TO THE DAIS FOR COMMENTS. GO AHEAD. VICE MAYOR.
03:48:56.000 --> 03:49:01.000
>> SO ORIGINALLY, IT WAS WRITTEN IN THE STAFF REPORT I SAID I THOUGHT IT SHOULD
03:49:01.000 --> 03:49:05.000
COME OUT OF THE WATER ENTERPRISE FUND. BUT I DID SUPPORT CLOSING OF THE
PROGRAM
03:49:05.000 --> 03:49:11.000
BECAUSE THE LIABILITY ISSUES, I'M NOT ATTACHED TO THAT. 03:49:11.000 --> 03:49:14.000
IF MAYBE WE HAVE A FUND CALLED THE FAILED PROGRAM FUND THAT WE COULD TAKE IT
03:49:14.000 --> 03:49:19.000
OUT OF.
03:49:19.000 --> 03:49:22.000
BESIDES THE GENERAL FUND, ARE THERE ANY OTHER FUNDS BUT IT COULD COME OUT OF?
03:49:22.000 --> 03:49:30.000
WE HAVE A LOT OF DIFFERENT FUNDS.
03:49:30.000 --> 03:49:33.000
>> I THINK WE NEED A MISTAKE FUND, WE SEEM TO HAVE THIS HAPPENING A LOT. 03:49:33.000 --> 03:49:39.000
OKAY, THANK YOU. GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER.
03:49:39.000 --> 03:49:43.000
>> I THINK OF THAT, THERE IS FIVE
03:49:43.000 --> 03:49:51.000
SO THE BILL IS SEVEN.
03:49:51.000 --> 03:49:56.000
WE NEED TO BE ON TOP OF OUR GAME AND MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE KEEPING UP WITH THESE
03:49:56.000 --> 03:50:01.000
PROGRAMS. AS THAT ONE PERSON SAID, GETTING INTO MORE PROGRAMS ISN'T GREAT.
03:50:01.000 --> 03:50:07.000
WE NEED TO KEEP THINGS VERY SIMPLE. LIKE COUNCILMEMBER MAURER, 03:50:07.000 --> 03:50:11.000
AND MY FELLOW ENTERPRISE FUNDS COLLEAGUES, SUPPORT
03:50:11.000 --> 03:50:18.000
PUTTING TO THE GENERAL FUND,
03:50:18.000 --> 03:50:25.000
THIS LEFTOVER MONEY, IT'S UNFORTUNATE BUT, IT BASICALLY SAVES OUR STAFF TIME,
03:50:25.000 --> 03:50:29.000
AND IT DOES PUNISH RATEPAYERS WHILE IT BENEFITS A FEW PEOPLE WHO RECEIVED THESE
03:50:29.000 --> 03:50:37.000
SERVICES. BUT BETTER JUST TO CLOSE IT OUT.
03:50:37.000 --> 03:50:40.000
>> I HAVE COMMENTS, I'VE GOT A LOT OF THOUGHTS, I'VE BEEN WATCHING THESE 03:50:40.000 --> 03:50:45.000
COUNCIL MEETINGS FOR A DECADE,
03:50:45.000 --> 03:50:54.000
I HAVE TO SAY, I'M SORRY BECAUSE,
03:50:54.000 --> 03:50:59.000
I'M DISAPPOINTED WITH ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES. THERE'S NOT ENOUGH
ACCURACY,
03:50:59.000 --> 03:51:02.000
THERE'S NOT ENOUGH CARE, THESE ARE RESIDENTS WHO ARE PAYING THIS MONEY.
AND NOW
03:51:02.000 --> 03:51:08.000
WE'RE ASKING THEM
03:51:08.000 --> 03:51:12.000
TO WRITE THEM OFF AND PAY MORE MONEY OUT OF THEIR POCKET AND AS SOMEONE WHO'S
03:51:12.000 --> 03:51:15.000
PAYING THESE HIGH WATER BILLS ALL THE TIME, WHOSE WATER BILL NEARLY
TRIPLED,
03:51:15.000 --> 03:51:19.000
EVEN REMEMBERS I WAS NOT SUPPORTIVE OF US RAISING THESE RATES THE WAY WE DID
03:51:19.000 --> 03:51:23.000
BECAUSE I FELT LIKE IT PUNISHED FAMILIES, AND TO HEAR THIS OVER AND OVER AGAIN,
03:51:23.000 --> 03:51:26.000
I COULD GO BACK TO THE MEETINGS AND PERHAPS I WILL, THE VARIOUS MISTAKES 03:51:26.000 --> 03:51:32.000
THROUGHOUT TIME SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE ON THE COUNCIL WITH MATH AND WITH
BILLING
03:51:32.000 --> 03:51:39.000
AND JUST, I THINK IT'S FLAGRANT, IT'S JUST OUTRAGEOUS TO ME. 03:51:39.000 --> 03:51:42.000
THAT WE TALK ABOUT THIS OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND FRANKLY IT MAKES ALL OF US AT
03:51:42.000 --> 03:51:46.000
THE DAIS LOOK FOOLISH. THAT WE DON'T HAVE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY 03:51:46.000 --> 03:51:50.000
TAKE CARE OF THIS BILLING AND GET IT RIGHT, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT
MISTAKES ARE
03:51:50.000 --> 03:51:53.000
MADE, BUT I AM HERE TO SAY THAT I'M TIRED OF SEEING THESE MISTAKES. I'M REALLY
03:51:53.000 --> 03:51:59.000
DISAPPOINTED AND I'M FRUSTRATED, AND I AM. I'M ANGRY,
03:51:59.000 --> 03:52:05.000
I GET THESE LARGE BILLS ALL THE TIME AND I THINK ABOUT THE FAMILIES THAT GET
03:52:05.000 --> 03:52:10.000
THEM, AT THIS POINT I'M UNHAPPY THAT I HAVE TO SAY THAT WE PROBABLY DO
NEED TO
03:52:10.000 --> 03:52:13.000
MOVE ON FROM THIS, AND I WOULD LIKE YOU TO COME OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND, I'D
03:52:13.000 --> 03:52:17.000
LIKE IT ALSO TO COME OUT OF SOMEONE'S HIDE BECAUSE I'M TIRED OF HAVING THESE
03:52:17.000 --> 03:52:20.000
MISTAKES. I AM SICK OF IT. I'VE WATCHED IT FOR A DECADE AND I'VE WATCHED IT FOR
03:52:20.000 --> 03:52:25.000
YEARS JUST SITTING HERE IT'S ALWAYS THE SAME DEPARTMENT AND I THINK THAT NEEDS
03:52:25.000 --> 03:52:30.000
TO BE STATED SO THAT THE PUBLIC COMMENT, I KNOW IT SOUNDS HARSH AND I
DON'T LIKE
03:52:30.000 --> 03:52:36.000
TO BE HARSH, BUT IT MAKES US LOOK FOOLISH UP HERE THAT WE CAN'T GET IT RIGHT.
03:52:36.000 --> 03:52:39.000
AND WE CONSISTENTLY MISSED THE MARK WITH IT. THERE'S BEEN MISSED BILLING SO
03:52:39.000 --> 03:52:42.000
MANY TIMES AND I KNOW THAT OTHER COUNCILMEMBERS HERE HAVE EXPRESSED THAT.
THAT
03:52:42.000 --> 03:52:47.000
EVERYBODY ELSE
03:52:47.000 --> 03:52:52.000
IS FEELING, AND IT'S BEST TO BE STRAIGHT AND FOR PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE THE
03:52:52.000 --> 03:53:00.000
FRUSTRATION LIES, THEY DON'T DESERVE TO BE TREATED LIKE THIS, IT MAKES ME SO
03:53:00.000 --> 03:53:04.000
ANGRY. I SUPPORT, WE DO NEED TO MOVE ON, AND I WOULD LIKE TO COME OUT OF THE
03:53:04.000 --> 03:53:08.000
GENERAL FUND, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A FUTURE CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS
BECAUSE I
03:53:08.000 --> 03:53:18.000
DON'T THINK THIS CAN CONTINUE. THANK YOU. GO AHEAD.
03:53:18.000 --> 03:53:24.000
>> TO ME, THIS IS A FAILED PROGRAM OF BAYREN. I CAN'T FAULT THE CITY AT ALL.
03:53:24.000 --> 03:53:27.000
THE CITY HAS WORKED HARD TO TRY AND NEGOTIATE A WAY OUT. WE HAD A
CONTRACT WITH
03:53:27.000 --> 03:53:33.000
THEM,
03:53:33.000 --> 03:53:42.000
AND I THINK THAT THEY DID THEIR BEST TO TRY TO GET OUT OF A BAD SITUATION. SO,
03:53:42.000 --> 03:53:45.000
I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO MOVE THIS FORWARD. WHATEVER I NEED TO SAY, HERE. WE
03:53:45.000 --> 03:53:49.000
HAVE ANOTHER ISSUE TO DEAL WITH.
03:53:49.000 --> 03:54:00.000
>> [ INAUDIBLE ]
03:54:00.000 --> 03:54:13.000
>> I'LL SECOND THAT.
03:54:13.000 --> 03:54:18.000
>> SO I HAD IT SO MOVED BY THE VICE MAYOR, AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER 03:54:18.000 --> 03:54:27.000
ZOLLMAN. TWO APPROVE SETTLING THE CITY'S REMAINING OBLIGATION TO BAYREN
FOR THE
03:54:27.000 --> 03:54:29.000
$13,141.23. WE WILL TAKE THIS FROM THE GENERAL FUND, COUNCILMEMBER CARTER?
03:54:29.000 --> 03:54:37.000
[ ROLL BEING CALLED ]
03:54:37.000 --> 03:54:42.000
MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ALL RIGHT.
03:54:42.000 --> 03:54:47.000
I'M SORRY, WHAT TIME IS IT? IT'S 10:00.
03:54:47.000 --> 03:54:55.000
SURE.
03:54:58.000 --> 03:55:01.000
>> I JUST KNOW IT'S 10 AFTER.
03:55:01.000 --> 03:55:04.000
ZACH, CAN YOU START THE MEETING, PLEASE?
03:55:04.000 --> 03:55:07.000
>> RECORDING IN PROGRESS.
03:55:07.000 --> 03:55:12.000
>> WE'RE BACK HERE AT THE DAIS.
03:55:12.000 --> 03:55:18.000
WE HAVE ONE MORE ITEM, I BELIEVE. I NUMBER 10.
03:55:18.000 --> 03:55:21.000
IN DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF 2026-27 CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND
PRIORITIES
03:55:21.000 --> 03:55:26.000
MEETING DATE FACILITATOR AND PROCESS THE ITEM ASKED THE COUNCIL TO DECIDE ON
03:55:26.000 --> 03:55:30.000
WHETHER TO HIRE AN EXTERNAL FACILITATOR FOR A DEDICATED GOALSETTING
WORKSHOP
03:55:30.000 --> 03:55:34.000
, HANDLE THE PROCESS INTERNALLY WITHOUT A FACILITATOR,
03:55:34.000 --> 03:55:37.000
AND TO SET A SPECIFIC DATE FOR THE GOALS/PRIORITIES DISCUSSION SESSION.
THIS IS
03:55:37.000 --> 03:55:42.000
TO GUIDE POLICY BUDGETING ESPECIALLY FOR FISCAL YEAR
03:55:42.000 --> 03:55:46.000
26-27 IN OPERATIONS FOR THE COMING PERIOD. AND
03:55:46.000 --> 03:55:51.000
INTERIM CITY MANAGER IS GOING TO DO THE PRESENTATION.
03:55:51.000 --> 03:55:57.000
>> YOU TO THE WHOLE STAFF REPORT. DUE TO THE TIMING I'M GOING TO TRY TO KEEP,
03:55:57.000 --> 03:56:04.000
IT'S ALL GOOD. DUE TO THE TIMING, AND BASICALLY THE ITEM TONIGHT IS
WHETHER OR
03:56:04.000 --> 03:56:07.000
NOT THEY WANT TO HIRE AN OUTSIDE FACILITATOR TO DO GOALS AND PRIORITY SETTING. I
03:56:07.000 --> 03:56:13.000
DID SEND OUT
03:56:13.000 --> 03:56:17.000
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS, WE DID RECEIVE TWO, THEY ARE ATTACHED TO YOUR AGENDA
03:56:17.000 --> 03:56:24.000
ITEM. ONE WAS FOR AROUND 9000, ONE WAS FOR 4500.
03:56:24.000 --> 03:56:28.000
THEY ARE BOTH HIGHLY QUALIFIED, HIGHLY RECOMMENDED, THAT IS ONE OPTION
FOR THE
03:56:28.000 --> 03:56:34.000
COUNCIL TO CONSIDER. ANOTHER OPTION IS TO HANDLE IT WITHOUT A
FACILITATOR,
03:56:34.000 --> 03:56:39.000
WAYS THAT WE COULD DO THIS, WE CAN SEND OUT MEMOS ONE-WAY COMMUNICATION FROM
03:56:39.000 --> 03:56:49.000
THE CITY MANAGER TO THE COUNCILMEMBERS. ASKING FOR TOPICS. 03:56:49.000 --> 03:56:52.000
WE WOULD BE USING OUR SIX GOALS, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT FOR THOSE GOALS THAT
03:56:52.000 --> 03:56:57.000
ARE NOT COMPLETED AS OF THIS YEAR,
03:56:57.000 --> 03:57:02.000
THAT WE CAN MOVE THOSE TO THE NEW YEAR, AND ANOTHER PROCESS I'VE BEEN
THINKING
03:57:02.000 --> 03:57:09.000
ABOUT IS NOT TO GO WITH A FACILITATOR, IT'S
03:57:09.000 --> 03:57:12.000
TO DO SOME TYPE OF FORM THAT THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS CAN FILL OUT IN
ADVANCE AS
03:57:12.000 --> 03:57:17.000
WELL INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR EVERYONE TO COME TO A CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
SO WE
03:57:17.000 --> 03:57:21.000
CAN HAVE THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED AND PUT THEM IN GROUPS, SO, WITHOUT GOING
03:57:21.000 --> 03:57:27.000
INTO THE INFORMATION THAT YOU GUYS DON'T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT THE GOALS
WHICH YOU
03:57:27.000 --> 03:57:32.000
ALREADY KNOW ABOUT, IS TO CONSIDER WHETHER YOU WANT A FACILITATOR BASED
UPON THE
03:57:32.000 --> 03:57:36.000
PROPOSALS AND IF NOT, TO DIRECT STAFF TO DO THE PROCESS AS FAR AS SENDING OUT
03:57:36.000 --> 03:57:40.000
INFORMATION TO THE COUNCILMEMBERS GAINING INFORMATION THERE, TO OUR
PUBLIC TO
03:57:40.000 --> 03:57:43.000
MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE HEARD AND BRINGING IT BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
THE KEY
03:57:43.000 --> 03:57:48.000
THING IS TO SET A DATE.
03:57:48.000 --> 03:57:53.000
I WILL SAY THAT TUESDAYS ARE THE BEST BECAUSE WE DO HAVE THIS ROOM, IT'S ALWAYS
03:57:53.000 --> 03:58:00.000
BEEN BOOKS FOR US. WE COULD DO IT ON AN OFF CITY COUNCIL MEETING 03:58:00.000 --> 03:58:05.000
OR IF THEY WANT TO DO IT ON A CITY COUNCIL MEETING NIGHT I WOULD SAY YOUR 03:58:05.000 --> 03:58:08.000
AGENDA COMING UP ARE PRETTY FULL. TO TRY TO DO GOALS ON AGENDA, OR PRIOR TO THE
03:58:08.000 --> 03:58:12.000
CITY COUNCIL MEETING BUT THE ITEM TONIGHT IS, DO YOU WANT A FACILITATOR AND IF
03:58:12.000 --> 03:58:17.000
YES THEN WE WILL BRING BACK A BUDGET AMENDMENT BECAUSE THERE'S NO 03:58:17.000 --> 03:58:21.000
, HAS NOT BEEN ALLOCATED, SO WE WOULD BRING THAT BACK ON CONSENT. IF NOT
THEN WE
03:58:21.000 --> 03:58:24.000
WOULD MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PROCESS AND THE AGENDA REPORT. 03:58:24.000 --> 03:58:31.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER CARTER?
03:58:31.000 --> 03:58:37.000
>> I DON'T REALLY HAVE A QUESTION, IT MIGHT BE A RHETORICAL QUESTION. I KNOW
03:58:37.000 --> 03:58:43.000
BOTH OF THE FACILITATORS, THE ULTIMATE FACILITATOR,
03:58:43.000 --> 03:58:46.000
THE CITY MANAGEMENT BEING THE FACILITATOR COULD DO A WONDERFUL JOB, I'M
LEANING
03:58:46.000 --> 03:58:52.000
TOWARD
03:58:52.000 --> 03:58:54.000
THAT CAN MAKE LIFE EASIER FOR ALL OF US, AND TRY TO, MY PREFERENCE WOULD BE ON
03:58:54.000 --> 03:58:59.000
A TUESDAY FOR SURE.
03:58:59.000 --> 03:59:04.000
NOT ON A COUNCIL DAY BUT EVERYTHING THAT YOU JUST SAID AS FAR AS SETTING THE
03:59:04.000 --> 03:59:14.000
PUBLIC UP, FEELS REALLY GOOD AS FAR AS ROLLING THINGS OVER, 03:59:14.000 --> 03:59:20.000
>> IS THIS A QUESTION? I JUST HAVE TO ASK. GO AHEAD. VICE MAYOR. 03:59:20.000 --> 03:59:23.000
>> I LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT BASED ON THE BUDGET COMMITTEE. WE DID DISCUSS AND
03:59:23.000 --> 03:59:30.000
REVIEW THAT ISSUE I THINK IT WAS.
03:59:30.000 --> 03:59:33.000
WE BOTH AGREED THAT IT WOULD BE BETTER NOT TO HIRE A FACILITATOR. A BIG
PART OF
03:59:33.000 --> 03:59:39.000
THIS IS TIMING, IT WOULD BE,
03:59:39.000 --> 03:59:44.000
WE CAN PROGRESS THIS FASTER IF WE DO IT OURSELVES.
03:59:44.000 --> 03:59:54.000
SO TIMING WAS A BIG PART OF THAT.
03:59:54.000 --> 03:59:58.000
>> I THINK YOU SHOULD GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT IF WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE ELSE. 03:59:58.000 --> 04:00:00.000
>> THIS IS PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THE PROCESS FOR THE CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND 04:00:00.000 --> 04:00:09.000
PRIORITIES UPCOMING
04:00:09.000 --> 04:00:13.000
SESSION FOR THE UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR 26-27 BUDGET IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A
04:00:13.000 --> 04:00:16.000
PUBLIC COMMENT, I WILL GO TO CHAMBERS FIRST. SEEING NONE I WILL GO TO
ZOOM, IF
04:00:16.000 --> 04:00:19.000
THERE'S ANYONE ON ZOOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE
04:00:19.000 --> 04:00:22.000
USE OF A FACILITATOR FOR THE PROCESS, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND VIRTUALLY.
SEEING
04:00:22.000 --> 04:00:27.000
NONE, THERE IS NO PUBLIC COMMENT.
04:00:27.000 --> 04:00:30.000
>> GO AHEAD.
04:00:30.000 --> 04:00:34.000
>> THE BUDGET COMMITTEE, I AGREE WITH YOUR RECOMMENDATION, WE DON'T NEED TO PAY
04:00:34.000 --> 04:00:39.000
THE MONEY AND IT BOGS DOWN THE PROCESS OF GETTING US TO AN APPROVED BUDGET.
04:00:39.000 --> 04:00:45.000
SO, FROM MY PERSPECTIVE WE DON'T NEED A FACILITATOR. THANK YOU FOR COMING UP
04:00:45.000 --> 04:00:51.000
WITH YOUR POTENTIAL AND YOUR GRADE AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT WE CAN SUBMIT IF WE
04:00:51.000 --> 04:00:54.000
HAVE SOMETHING BEYOND THE SIX THAT WE ALREADY HAVE AND I'M FINE WITH
PICKING A
04:00:54.000 --> 04:00:59.000
TUESDAY DATE IN APRIL.
04:00:59.000 --> 04:01:05.000
>> I'M GOING TO GIVE MY COMMENTS REAL QUICK. I DON'T WANT TO PAY A
FACILITATOR,
04:01:05.000 --> 04:01:07.000
WE JUST HIT THE GENERAL FUNDS. I DON'T WANT A FACILITATOR AND THEN ALSO, I
04:01:07.000 --> 04:01:13.000
PERSONALLY,
04:01:13.000 --> 04:01:19.000
TUESDAY'S WORK, BUT I WOULD LIKE FOR US TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO IT ON
04:01:19.000 --> 04:01:24.000
THE MEETING. DAY, AND NOT, I'M TEAM, LET'S HAVE, LET'S NOT ADD MORE
MEETINGS AND
04:01:24.000 --> 04:01:34.000
TRY TO FIGURE THAT OUT IF THAT DOES WORK. TIMING WISE. AND I DO LIKE THE
IDEA OF
04:01:34.000 --> 04:01:38.000
PULLING THE COMMUNITY AHEAD OF TIME, I THINK IT WOULD ALLOW US TO BE MORE 04:01:38.000 --> 04:01:42.000
EXPEDIENT IN OUR DISCUSSION, LIKE YOU SAID, GROUPING THEM TOGETHER. THAT
MAKES A
04:01:42.000 --> 04:01:46.000
LOT OF SENSE. THAT'S WHERE I MET WITH IT. ANYONE ELSE?
04:01:46.000 --> 04:01:50.000
DO YOU WANT TO FINISH YOUR COMMENTS?
04:01:50.000 --> 04:01:53.000
>> YES.
04:01:53.000 --> 04:01:58.000
>> TOO BAD.
04:01:58.000 --> 04:02:07.000
>> OKAY. I WAS GOING TO ASK,
04:02:07.000 --> 04:02:10.000
HERE IT SAYS FOR US TO PICK A DATE, YOU'RE WANTING US TO PICK A DATE
HERE, IS
04:02:10.000 --> 04:02:14.000
THAT WHAT YOU'RE ASKING?
04:02:14.000 --> 04:02:18.000
>> I DON'T MIND IF I JUMP IT REALLY QUICK. PICKING A DATE IS VERY
HELPFUL,
04:02:18.000 --> 04:02:22.000
YOU'RE ALL HERE, IT AVOIDS TRYING TO GO BACK AND FORTH. WE CAN START THE
PROCESS
04:02:22.000 --> 04:02:24.000
SOONER RATHER THAN LATER, SO THAT WE HAVE GETTING INFORMATION TO THE
COMMUNITY,
04:02:24.000 --> 04:02:33.000
GIVING THEM MORE TIME.
04:02:33.000 --> 04:02:38.000
>> SO I DID CHECK WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, WE HAVE A COUNCIL MEETING APRIL
04:02:38.000 --> 04:02:41.000
7th, APRIL 14th IS THE PLANNING COMMISSION THEY DON'T ANTICIPATE HAVING A 04:02:41.000 --> 04:02:44.000
MEETING THAT NIGHT. SO WE CAN LOOK AT HAVING IT DURING THE DAY, OR DURING THE
04:02:44.000 --> 04:02:49.000
NIGHT.
04:02:49.000 --> 04:02:52.000
OR THE COUNCIL IF THEY WANT TO DO BEFORE COUNCIL MEETING WE COULD DO IT DURING
04:02:52.000 --> 04:02:54.000
THE DAY AS WELL. I KNOW VICE MAYOR MAURER HAD A COMMENT. 04:02:54.000 --> 04:02:59.000
>> MARCH 31st, IS
04:02:59.000 --> 04:03:04.000
THE FIFTH TUESDAY. CAN WE DO IT THEN?
04:03:04.000 --> 04:03:07.000
>> IT'S A CITY HOLIDAY. IT IS CESAR CHAVEZ DAY BUT THE COMMUNITY CENTER HAS
04:03:07.000 --> 04:03:10.000
RENTED OUT THE BUILDING.
04:03:10.000 --> 04:03:13.000
>> OKAY.
04:03:13.000 --> 04:03:17.000
>> I'M GOOD WITH THE 14th IN THE EVENING.
04:03:17.000 --> 04:03:27.000
>> [ INAUDIBLE ]
04:03:27.000 --> 04:03:35.000
>> COUNCILMEMBER HINTON, HOW LONG ARE WE TALKING ABOUT FOR A MEETING? 04:03:35.000 --> 04:03:38.000
>> THAT WOULD DEPEND HOW LONG THE COUNCIL WANTS TO MEET. OUR GOALS AND 04:03:38.000 --> 04:03:45.000
PRIORITIES WAS ABOUT SIX HOURS, I BELIEVE.
04:03:45.000 --> 04:03:51.000
I DON'T ANTICIPATE IT TAKING AS LONG, BECAUSE WE BASICALLY, WASN'T IT? 04:03:51.000 --> 04:03:54.000
I THOUGHT IT WAS BEFORE CITY COUNCIL MEETING IT STARTED AT -- 04:03:54.000 --> 04:03:57.000
>> IT WAS AN ALL DAY EVENT.
04:03:57.000 --> 04:04:00.000
>> IT WAS AT LEAST FOUR HOURS. I THINK IF WE GIVE A LOT OF THE
INFORMATION, IF
04:04:00.000 --> 04:04:05.000
WE HAVE A LOT OF THE INFORMATION COMPILED, LAST TIME
04:04:05.000 --> 04:04:09.000
WE WAITED UNTIL THAT DAY AND THEN WE TOOK PUBLIC COMMENT, 04:04:09.000 --> 04:04:15.000
INTO PROVIDING US THAT INFORMATION,
04:04:15.000 --> 04:04:18.000
BEFORE THIS MEETING SO THAT I CAN COMPILE IT, I DON'T THINK THAT WILL
BRING US
04:04:18.000 --> 04:04:23.000
AS LONG.
04:04:23.000 --> 04:04:27.000
I WOULD LIKE TO NOT GO BEYOND THE APRIL 14th OR 15th DATE, BECAUSE WE
HAVE THE
04:04:27.000 --> 04:04:30.000
BUDGET PROCESS COMING UP AND WE WANT TO INCORPORATE SOME OF THESE ITEMS
INTO THE
04:04:30.000 --> 04:04:33.000
UPCOMING BUDGET.
04:04:33.000 --> 04:04:39.000
>> OKAY. COUNCILMEMBER HINTON.
04:04:39.000 --> 04:04:46.000
>> I AM NOT WILLING TO TAKE A DAY OFF TO DO THIS DURING THE DAY. I'M SORRY.
04:04:46.000 --> 04:04:50.000
THAT MIGHT BE CONVENIENT FOR YOU BUT I'M WILLING TO DO IT ON THE NIGHT OF THE
04:04:50.000 --> 04:04:55.000
14th OR ANY OTHER EVENING THAT WE CAN MAKE WORK FOR OUR CALENDARS. 04:04:55.000 --> 04:04:59.000
>> GO AHEAD, VICE MAYOR.
04:04:59.000 --> 04:05:03.000
>> LAST YEAR THE MEETING WAS FIVE HOURS, FROM 1:00 TO 6:00 AND WE
FOLLOWED IT
04:05:03.000 --> 04:05:10.000
WITH A COUNCIL MEETING, MAYBE. WE DID. WE COULD PROBABLY DO IT IN FOUR,
BECAUSE
04:05:10.000 --> 04:05:13.000
WE WON'T NEED ALL THE OTHER, WHEN WE DID IT LAST YEAR, THEY HAD A COUPLE HOURS
04:05:13.000 --> 04:05:17.000
OF REVIEW OF THIS AND THAT, I DON'T THINK WE NEED THAT. 04:05:17.000 --> 04:05:24.000
>> WHAT TIME WOULD WE WANT TO BE STARTING? I'M NOT
04:05:24.000 --> 04:05:28.000
PRO ANOTHER FOUR HOUR MEETING, THAT PUTS US WEEK AFTER WEEK WHERE WE'RE HERE
04:05:28.000 --> 04:05:34.000
UNTIL 10:00 AT NIGHT. ARE YOU ALL KEEN ON THAT?
04:05:34.000 --> 04:05:40.000
I'M NOT ADVOCATING, I'M ADVOCATING FOR A SHORTER MEETING. 04:05:40.000 --> 04:05:43.000
I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WHATEVER WE DO WE'RE NOT HERE UNTIL 10:00, 10:30 AT
04:05:43.000 --> 04:05:45.000
NIGHT.
04:05:45.000 --> 04:05:48.000
>> LET'S SEE HOW WE CAN CUT IT.
04:05:48.000 --> 04:05:54.000
>> WE CAN'T, THE SPIRIT OF IT.
04:05:54.000 --> 04:06:01.000
>> I LIKE SHORTER MEETINGS BUT I'M WILLING TO GO TO WHAT IT TAKES. I LIKE 04:06:01.000 --> 04:06:04.000
SHORTER MEETINGS BUT I'M WILLING TO DO WHAT IT TAKES. WHATEVER THAT IS 04:06:04.000 --> 04:06:07.000
DEPENDING ON THE PROCESS.
04:06:07.000 --> 04:06:10.000
>> LOOKING AT THE AGENDA FOR THE LAST MEETING, THE ACTUAL GOAL SET IN WAS 04:06:10.000 --> 04:06:16.000
BLOCKED OUT FOR BASICALLY THREE HOURS.
04:06:16.000 --> 04:06:23.000
AND THE REST OF IT, THERE WAS A REVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL UPDATE, THE
MODELS, AND
04:06:23.000 --> 04:06:31.000
WHAT MAKES GOOD GOVERNANCE, AND OTHER STUFF THAT TOOK UP THE REST OF THE TIME.
04:06:31.000 --> 04:06:34.000
>> SO WHAT'S ON THE TABLE IS APRIL 14th, AT 6:00 P.M., IS THAT WHAT WE'RE 04:06:34.000 --> 04:06:39.000
SAYING?
04:06:39.000 --> 04:06:45.000
>> WE COULD DO IT AT 5:30 IF THAT HELPS IN TERMS OF TIMING. 04:06:45.000 --> 04:06:49.000
>> MY COMMITMENT TO THIS COUNCIL HAS ALWAYS BEEN TO 6:00 MEETINGS. 04:06:49.000 --> 04:06:52.000
IT'S DIFFICULT TO GET THROUGH TRAFFIC IF YOU HAVEN'T GONE DOWN 101 DURING 04:06:52.000 --> 04:06:55.000
COMMUTE HOURS AND YOU CAN'T GET IN THE COMMUTE LANE.
04:06:55.000 --> 04:06:59.000
>> I'M OKAY WITH 6:00.
04:06:59.000 --> 04:07:05.000
>> WE'LL NEED A MOTION
04:07:05.000 --> 04:07:11.000
TO RECOMMEND NOT HIRING A FACILITATOR INTO PROCEEDING WITH THE PROCESS AS 04:07:11.000 --> 04:07:14.000
OUTLINED IN THE CITY MANAGER AND PICKING THE APRIL 14th DATE, AND WILL BEGIN
04:07:14.000 --> 04:07:24.000
ANNOUNCING THAT AND GETTING INFORMATION TO THE COMMUNITY. AT 6:00 P.M. 04:07:24.000 --> 04:07:27.000
>> OKAY, SO MOVED BY MAYOR McLEWIS, SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR MAURER TO NOT 04:07:27.000 --> 04:07:33.000
RECOMMEND SELECTION OF A FACILITATOR BUT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PROCESS AS
04:07:33.000 --> 04:07:36.000
OUTLINED IN THE AGENDA REPORT, WITH A DATE OF APRIL 14th AT 6:00 P.M. TO
BE HELD
04:07:36.000 --> 04:07:42.000
HERE. COUNCILMEMBER CARTER? [ ROLL BEING CALLED ]
04:07:42.000 --> 04:07:50.000
MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
04:07:50.000 --> 04:07:54.000
>> LOOKING AT THE TIME, WE HAVE
04:07:54.000 --> 04:07:58.000
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT.
04:07:58.000 --> 04:08:01.000
>> THIS A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA. IF YOU DID NOT TALK 04:08:01.000 --> 04:08:04.000
EARLIER IN THE AGENDA IF YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT. PLEASE
RAISE YOUR
04:08:04.000 --> 04:08:10.000
HAND VIRTUALLY.
04:08:10.000 --> 04:08:16.000
SEEING NONE ON ZOOM, IF THERE'S ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A
04:08:16.000 --> 04:08:19.000
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR AN ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA? THERE'S NO PUBLIC COMMENT
THAT I'M
04:08:19.000 --> 04:08:24.000
SEEING. >>
04:08:24.000 --> 04:08:28.000
THE NEXT THING IS COUNCILMEMBERS REQUEST FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS.
04:08:28.000 --> 04:08:31.000
DO WE HAVE ANY REQUESTS? NOT AT THIS TIME, OKAY. NOW WE HAVE 04:08:31.000 --> 04:08:36.000
CITY STAFF REPORTS.
04:08:36.000 --> 04:08:43.000
>> THANK YOU. SO, AGENDA REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING, TOMORROW, 04:08:43.000 --> 04:08:51.000
AND WE ALSO HAVE THE MENTAL FROM THE POLICE CHIEF.
04:08:51.000 --> 04:08:54.000
AND I DO NOT HAVE ANY FURTHER REPORTS AT THIS TIME. OTHER THAN OUR NEW PUBLIC
04:08:54.000 --> 04:08:58.000
WORKS DIRECTOR, AS YOU APPROVED THE CONTRACT WILL BE OUT ON MONDAY. 04:08:58.000 --> 04:09:05.000
>> ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE? OKAY. SO NOW,
04:09:05.000 --> 04:09:11.000
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS? DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING NEW TO REPORT OUT? GO AHEAD.
04:09:11.000 --> 04:09:19.000
>> I ATTENDED A CT CA LAST MONDAY. FOR THE MEETING, AND 04:09:19.000 --> 04:09:23.000
IT WAS REALLY A LIGHT AGENDA EXCEPT IT WAS THE OFFICER CHANGE, CHANGING OF THE
04:09:23.000 --> 04:09:30.000
GUARD, THERE'S ALWAYS A CITY REPRESENTATIVE, AND SINCE
04:09:30.000 --> 04:09:34.000
KELLY FROM HEALDSBURG WAS VICE CHAIR, SHE MOVED INTO THE CHAIR POSITION, AND
04:09:34.000 --> 04:09:37.000
THEN THERE'S A SUPERVISOR THAT FILLS THE OTHER SEAT, AND CHRIS CORSI
FILLED THE
04:09:37.000 --> 04:09:43.000
VICE CHAIR SEAT. I CONTINUE ON THE EXECUTIVE BOARD
04:09:43.000 --> 04:09:47.000
AS A FULL-FLEDGED MEMBER, LINDA HOPKINS MOVED TO ALTERNATE, AND I
CONTINUE ON
04:09:47.000 --> 04:09:51.000
THE TRANSPORTATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPRESENTING THE COUNTY. 04:09:51.000 --> 04:09:55.000
SO, THAT IS BASICALLY
04:09:55.000 --> 04:10:01.000
, WE DID HEAR FROM OUR LOBBYIST,
04:10:01.000 --> 04:10:05.000
WE DO HIRE PEOPLE TO REPRESENT TRANSPORTATION FOR US AND HELP US IN
SACRAMENTO,
04:10:05.000 --> 04:10:08.000
AND OTHER THAN THAT IT WAS PRETTY MUCH BASIC REPORTS. IT WAS PRETTY
STANDARD
04:10:08.000 --> 04:10:13.000
MEETING.
04:10:13.000 --> 04:10:21.000
>> OKAY. ANYONE ELSE? I CAN REPORT OUT FOR MINE.
04:10:21.000 --> 04:10:26.000
IT'S BEEN A LIGHT TWO WEEKS, ATTENDED THE AGENDA REVIEW, AND THEN WE HAD OUR
04:10:26.000 --> 04:10:30.000
MAYORS AND COUNCILMEMBERS, WE HAVE THE BOARD MEETING, AND THE MEETING FOR ALL
04:10:30.000 --> 04:10:36.000
THE COUNCILMEMBERS, AND THIS PAST WEEKEND, WAS IT SUNDAY? 04:10:36.000 --> 04:10:43.000
AFTER READING A LOT OF THE STUFF,
04:10:43.000 --> 04:10:48.000
IN THE NEWS, AND SOCIAL MEDIA, AND THE STATEMENT PUT OUT BY THE HUMANE
SOCIETY
04:10:48.000 --> 04:10:55.000
ABOUT NORTHBAY ANIMAL SERVICES, AND THE CONCERN
04:10:55.000 --> 04:10:58.000
FOR THE ANIMALS AND WHAT THEY HAD FOUND IN CLEARLAKE, I BECAME CONCERNED.
SO ON
04:10:58.000 --> 04:11:03.000
SUNDAY, I DROVE DOWN
04:11:03.000 --> 04:11:08.000
TO THE PETALUMA FACILITY, WHERE OUR ANIMALS ARE TAKEN BECAUSE I STARTED TO GET
04:11:08.000 --> 04:11:12.000
WORRIED, AND I POPPED IN THERE AND ASKED THEM, TOLD THEM WHO I WAS AND ASKED
04:11:12.000 --> 04:11:19.000
THEM IF THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO GIVE ME A TOUR. THEY WERE VERY PLEASANT, TOOK
04:11:19.000 --> 04:11:24.000
10 MINUTES, AND THEY WALKED ME AROUND EVERYWHERE TO SHOW ME 04:11:24.000 --> 04:11:29.000
THE FACILITY, THEY SAID THEY DO THAT A LOT NOW, WITH EVERYTHING THAT'S
BEEN IN
04:11:29.000 --> 04:11:35.000
THE NEWS. AND I FOUND THINGS TO BE IN GENERAL CLEAN AND I DIDN'T SEE
ANYTHING
04:11:35.000 --> 04:11:40.000
THAT WAS CONCERNING TO ME. GOT TO PLAY WITH THE CATS A LITTLE BIT, AND
ANYWAY, I
04:11:40.000 --> 04:11:45.000
WANTED TO REPORT OUT THAT I DID DO THAT, I DIDN'T TALK TO THEM ABOUT
ANYTHING
04:11:45.000 --> 04:11:49.000
OTHER THAN MY OWN CATS AND DOGS, BUT I WAS VERY CONCERNED ABOUT IT. AND I WANTED
04:11:49.000 --> 04:11:52.000
TO LET THE COUNCIL KNOW THAT I WENT DOWN THERE AND DID THAT. THAT'S THE ONLY
04:11:52.000 --> 04:11:57.000
THINGS THAT I HAD
04:11:57.000 --> 04:12:00.000
OVER THE LAST TWO WEEKS.
04:12:00.000 --> 04:12:03.000
>> THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT AND AS A FOLLOW-UP, I DO VOLUNTEER AT OUR HUMANE
04:12:03.000 --> 04:12:07.000
SOCIETY, AND WHAT I OVERHEARD AND SAW REMAINS THE REASON WHY I'M BRINGING THE
04:12:07.000 --> 04:12:13.000
AGENDA REPORT. TWO HAVE AGENDA REVIEW TOMORROW CONSIDER IMMEDIATE
TERMINATION
04:12:13.000 --> 04:12:16.000
WITH THAT CENTER. HEARING STAFF HAVE TO COME IN ON SATURDAY AND SUNDAY TO 04:12:16.000 --> 04:12:20.000
PROCESS THE NUMBER OF ANIMALS THAT THEY ENDED UP HAVING TO TAKE AND
WATCHING THE
04:12:20.000 --> 04:12:24.000
DOGS IN THE CONDITION THAT THEY WERE IN, THIS IS AFTER THEY WERE
SHOWERED, IT'S
04:12:24.000 --> 04:12:29.000
UNCONSCIONABLE, TO ME. I DON'T REALLY CARE WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH 04:12:29.000 --> 04:12:31.000
WHATEVER, IT'S PART OF THE SAME SYSTEM THAT MALTREATED THESE ANIMALS. AND THEN
04:12:31.000 --> 04:12:37.000
I'LL ALSO SAY THE FACT THAT TODAY
04:12:37.000 --> 04:12:42.000
IS JAM-PACKED WITH MEETINGS, ON THE PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, 04:12:42.000 --> 04:12:47.000
COMMITTEE AND WE DID THAT FOR AN HOUR AND A HALF, AND I WENT TO THE
ELECTEDS,
04:12:47.000 --> 04:12:50.000
THERE'S A GROUP OF US THAT ARE ELECTEDS, AND THAT WAS EARLIER THIS
AFTERNOON AND
04:12:50.000 --> 04:12:53.000
THEN I CAME HERE. THAT'S MY STATUS.
04:12:53.000 --> 04:12:55.000
>> GO AHEAD.
04:12:55.000 --> 04:12:59.000
>> I WANT TO GIVE A QUICK UPDATE.
04:12:59.000 --> 04:13:03.000
TO TELL YOU GUYS THAT THE ENTERPRISE FUND IS LOOKING AT THE WATER AND
SEWER IS
04:13:03.000 --> 04:13:09.000
MAKING PRETTY GOOD PROGRESS. WE HAVE A FINANCIAL GROUP AND AN OPERATIONS GROUP,
04:13:09.000 --> 04:13:13.000
THE OPERATIONS GROUP TO GENERAL TOUR, AND THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT IS
TAKING A
04:13:13.000 --> 04:13:18.000
FEEL
04:13:18.000 --> 04:13:20.000
-- FINE COMB TO THE PROCESS. I FEEL GOOD ABOUT WHAT WE'RE DOING AS A
GROUP AND
04:13:20.000 --> 04:13:24.000
NOT TOO BURDENSOME ON STAFF.
04:13:24.000 --> 04:13:28.000
>> ALL RIGHT. SO, I THINK THAT'S IT.
04:13:28.000 --> 04:13:33.000
>> CAN I DO ONE MORE UPDATE I FORGOT.
04:13:33.000 --> 04:13:36.000
FOR THE ENTIRE GROUP, THE CITY COUNCIL, THE AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR THE
COUNCIL
04:13:36.000 --> 04:13:40.000
PROTOCOLS HAS MET AND WE WILL BE BRINGING BACK ADDITIONAL TOPICS TO BE PLACED
04:13:40.000 --> 04:13:44.000
INTO THE COUNCIL PROTOCOL. WE NEED TO DISCUSS OUR NEXT MEETING. 04:13:44.000 --> 04:13:48.000
>> ALL RIGHT. MEETING ADJOURNED, 10:25. THANKS.
ZACH, ARE WE READY TO START RECORDING THE MEETING? THANK YOU.
NO PROBLEM. SO ARE WE READY? ALL RIGHT, EVERYONE, WOW. WE HAVE A FULL HOUSE. WELCOME, EVERYONE. ALL RIGHT, SO LET'S JUST CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. IT IS 6:00 P.M., FEBRUARY 17, AND MARY, DO YOU WANT TO -- I'LL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. COUNCILMEMBER CARTER?
HERE.
COUNCILMEMBER HINTON?
HERE.
COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN?
YES.
VICE MAYOR MAURER? >> HERE.
MAYOR MCLEWIS? >> HERE.
PLEASE NOTE, ALL COUNCILMEMBERS ARE IN ATTENDANCE.
ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. WE HAVE SPECIAL GUESTS HERE TONIGHT, SO WE'RE GOING TO DO A ABSOLUTE TO THE FLAG, BUT SCOUTING AMERICA, TROOP 27 SEBASTOPOL, SOMEONE IS GOING TO COME UP AND HELP US LEAD THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
ALL RIGHT, SO IF WE WOULD ALL STAND. YOU CAN JUST STAND RIGHT THERE IF YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND GET IT STARTED. [ INAUDIBLE ]
PLEASE JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEI PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG . OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. LET ME GET BACK. SO LET'S SEE. I JUST WANT TO SEE IF WE HAVE EVERYONE HERE. WE ALWAYS DO A LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT, SO I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND READ THAT RIGHT NOW. THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL
ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WE LIVE AND WORK WITHIN THE UNCEDED ANCESTRAL HOMELANDS OF THE SOUTHERN POMO AND COAST MIWOK PEOPLE. WE PAY OUR RESPECTS TO THE
PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE GENERATIONS OF THESE PEOPLES, INCLUDING THE FED RATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA. AND IN ADDITION EVERY MEETING, I READ JUST A LITTLE BLURB ABOUT REMEMBERING THE HISTORY OF SEBASTOPOL. SO JUST TWO QUICK ONES FOR THIS EVENING. I DO THIS IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR WEST COUNTY HISTORY MUSEUM. IN 1937, SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS WERE MADE IN SEBASTOPOL. SEBASTOPOL RECEIVED $19,000 IN FUNDS TO IMPROVE ITS SIDEWALKS AND STREETS. THE PROJECT ACTUALLY EMPLOYED 28 MEN FOR EIGHT MONTHS. THEN IN 1939, A $30,000 PARK FUND WAS GIVEN TO SEBASTOPOL. SEBASTOPOL WAS ENDOWED WITH THE CASH LEGACY OF $30,000 OR MORE TO BE USED IN DEVELOPING A CITY PARK AND PLAYGROUND ACCORDING TO TERMS OF THE WILL OF KATHERINE L.
IVES TODAY IN SANTA ROSA. THIS IS FROM A PAPER BACK THEN. UNDER THE TERMS
OF THE WILL, PRESIDENT OF SEBASTOPOL NATIONAL BANK AND THREE TRUSTEES WERE APPOINTED. HARRY FULLER, A.F. COCHRAN, AND JEANNE BECK. THEY SHALL
REQUIRE ATTRACTED LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR THE PLAYGROUND RECREATIONAL USES TO APPROVE TRACK, AND SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS IVES MEMORIAL PARK.
THEREAFTER IT SHALL BE DEEDED TO THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL. MRS. IVES HAD
CONSIDERABLE PROPERTY HOLDINGS IN THE CITY, AND SHE WAS A COUSIN OF THE LATE A.B. SWAIN. A PIECE OF INFORMATION. A.B. SWAIN DEVELOPED SWAIN WOODS JUST SOUTH OF HYDE PARK. I ENJOY READING ALL THESE PIECES OF HISTORY, NOT BEING FROM HERE. I'VE LIVED HERE FOR 11 YEARS, SO I LEARNED A LOT. I HOPE OTHERS DO AS WELL. SO LET'S SEE, MOVING ON TO THE NEXT ITEM. WE HAVE PROCLAMATIONS TONIGHT. WE HAVE A PROCLAMATION --I DON'T KNOW. LET ME PUT MY GLASSES ON HERE TO SEE WHO IS ALL HERE. SO DO WE HAVE GOLD RIDGE PRESENT? OKAY. SO WE HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION, AND I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND READ THOSE. LET ME JUST PULL THOSE OUT VERY QUICKLY. MY APOLOGIES. SOME OF THESE GOT A LITTLE BIT OUT OF ORDER. SORRY, OKAY. SO I'M GOING TO READ ONE OF THESE, AND THEN I WILL JUST CALL EVERYONE UP.
YOU CAN LET ME KNOW --I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT A GROUP PICTURE AT THE END. YOU CAN LET ME KNOW IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO THAT. THIS CERTIFICATE
IS PRESENTED TO SHOW OUR SINCERE APPRECIATION FOR YOUR PROMPT PROFESSIONAL AND DEDICATED RESPONSE TO THE HOUSE FIRE. YOUR COMMITMENT TO
PUBLIC SAFETY TEAMWORK AND SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY WAS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED THROUGH YOUR ACTIONS. THE CITY SENDS ITS --RESPONDING TO THIS EMERGENCY IN HELPING PROTECT LIVES AND PROPERTY. ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY COUNCIL AND CITIZENS OF SEBASTOPOL, I, MAYOR MCLEWIS, GRATEFULLY
ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL AND THE CITIZENS OF THIS COMMUNITY. AND THIS IS ON GOLD RIDGE FIRE DISTRICT, IF YOU WANT TO COME UP. WE CAN PRESENT THIS TO YOU.
AND NOW WE'D ALSO LIKE TO PRESENT THE SAME CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION TO
OUR POLICE OFFICERS, SO WE HAVE CHIEF MCDONAGH, OFFICER JOSIAH WOTILA, OFFICER JAIME BALDOVINOS, AND DISPATCHER CHRIS MOONEY. IF YOU WOULD ALL
LIKE TO COME UP, WE'D LOVE TO PRESENT YOU WITH A CERTIFICATE, AND TRULY A LOT OF GRATITUDE FOR EVERYTHING YOU'VE DONE. WE JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU. SEAN, DID YOU WANT A GROUP PICTURE WITH THE FIREFIGHTERS? OKAY. IF WE COULD DO THAT VERY QUICKLY. YOU WANT TO COME UPFRONT AND WE CAN DO IT? THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. WE APPRECIATE YOU GIVING US LATITUDE TO HONOR THESE GUYS. EVERYONE WHO HAS TAKEN CARE OF OUR COMMUNITY EVERY DAY. ALL RIGHT, SO WE'RE GOING TO GO ONTO STATEMENTS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. DO WE HAVE ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST? NO? OKAY. ALL RIGHT, NOW WE'RE GOING TO GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA. IT'S UP TO 20 MINUTES, AND I'LL HAND IT OVER TO MARY.
THANK YOU, MAYOR. SO AS YOU JUST STATED, THIS IS THE FIRST PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. THERE ARE TWO. THERE'S A SECOND ONE AT THE END OF THE AGENDA. IT IS A 20-MINUTE TIME LIMIT FOR THE FIRST PERIOD. THAT MEANS IT IS TWO MINUTES PER SPEAKER, SO WE'LL HAVE TEN SPEAKERS. I'LL DO CHAMBERS FIRST, THEN I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM, COME BACK TO CHAMBERS, GO OUT TO ZOOM. ANYONE
IN THE CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA? LISA, THEN I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM AFTER THAT.
HI, EVERYBODY. IS IT ON? >> IS THE LIGHT ON?
MY NAME IS LISA PIERS. I WANT TO SAY A FEW THINGS ABOUT A BIG DECISION YOU'LL SOON BE FACING ABOUT OUR STREET SYSTEM. I THINK THE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION WE NEED TO ASK OURSELVES IS WHY IN 1985 DID WE SWITCH FROM A TWO-WAY STREET SYSTEM TO A ONE-WAY SYSTEM. AND WE HAVE TO REALLY
UNDERSTAND THAT ONE. AND THEN WHY WOULD WE WANT TO SWITCH BACK? AND THEN
WHAT ARE ALL THE POTENTIAL DRAWBACKS, RISKS, AND COSTS WITH DOING THIS MAJOR CHANGE OF GOING BACK TO A TWO-WAY SYSTEM? WE CAN SEE HOW PEOPLE VOTED BEFORE, AND WE CAN SEE THE RESULTS OF THE RECENT SURVEY. EVERYTHING I'VE SEEN POINTS TO THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE NOT WANTING TO SWITCH TO TWOWAY STREETS. I THINK PEOPLE RECOGNIZE GIVEN OUR SITUATION, WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT BIG PROBLEMS IF WE WENT THIS WAY. IF THE COUNCIL IS AT ALL
CONSIDERING SWITCHING OUR SYSTEM, I WOULD ASK YOU TO LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE FIRST. I AGREE WITH WHAT HINTON SAID IN A PUBLIC COMMENT IN 2023 WHEN SHE
SAID PEOPLE VOTED TO TURN MAIN STREET INTO A ONE-WAY STREET, AND
SUPPORTERS OF TWO-WAY STREETS WANT TO CHANGE THAT, THEY COULD TAKE IT TO THE VOTERS. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, LISA, FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM.
KATE, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? >> HELLO.
THANK YOU. CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
YES, THANK YOU.
GREAT, GO AHEAD WITH YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE.
COUNCIL AND THE CITY IS PROBABLY AWARE JACK TIBBOTT, FORMERLY OF ST.
VINCENT DE PAUL IS NOW RUNNING AS A REPUBLICAN IN THE STATE OF OREGON.
HIS REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN MODE MOTTO, COMMON SENSE LEADERSHIP, LESS TAXES, LESS REGULATION. HE MOVED TO OREGON AND SOUGHT POLITICAL OFFICE BECAUSE HE WAS, "DISILLUSIONED BY CALIFORNIA'S CULTURE AND POLITICAL CLIMATE," AND WANTED SOMETHING DIFFERENT FOR HIS CHILDREN. A PLACE WHERE HIS BOYS
COULD BE RAISED WITH STRONG VALUES, A SOLID WORK ETHIC, FAITH, SPIRITUALTY, AND A DEEP CONNECTION TO AGRICULTURE. I BRING THIS UP
BECAUSE JACK MADE MANY PERSONAL GUARANTEES IN REGARD TO THE CITY'S PARTNERSHIP WITH ST. VINCENT DE PAUL ON A PROJECT THAT IS NOW UNDERWAY.
MANY PEOPLE SAID, INCLUDING MYSELF, HE WAS A CARPET GRIFTER AND HAD NO SKIN IN THE GAME WHEN IT CAME TO SEBASTOPOL. HE HAD NO GUILTY ABOUT
PUTTING A HOME KEY SITE, ALLOWING ACTIVE DRUG USE IN THE MIDDLE
SEBASTOPOL'S COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, CLOSE RANGE OF THE PUBLIC SCHOOL IN A NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FOR FAMILIES. SO HE HAS MOVED TO OREGON TO RUN AS
A REPUBLICAN, AND THE PEOPLE OF SEBASTOPOL ARE STUCK WITH A HORRIBLE AND PERMANENT DEAL. COUNCIL NEEDS TO LEARN AN IMPORTANT LESSON THEY'VE NEVER
SEENED TO LEARN, WHICH THE DECISIONS THEY MADE MUST BE FOR THE BETTERMENT OF THEIR RESIDENTS AND SEBASTOPOL BUSINESSES. DO NOT LET OUTSIDE INTEREST, NON-PROFIT, OR COMMERCIAL, INFLUENCE DECISIONS. IS THIS GOOD FOR SEBASTOPOL RESIDENTS? IS THIS GOOD FOR SEBASTOPOL OF BUSINESSES? IF THE ANSWER IS NO ON EITHER ACCOUNT, THE VOTE MUST BE NO. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, KATE FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS. IF THERE IS ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A
COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT --
HI, STEVE PIERCE FROM SEBASTOPOL. I'M FOLLOWING UP ON MY WIFE, LISA'S COMMENTS ON THE PARKING TRAFFIC OPTIONS. IT'S REALLY THE DOWNTOWN PLAN, PRODUCED. OUR CONSULTANTS. I THINK THEY HAD A PRUDENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY. THEY SUGGESTED THE CITY GO WITH THE WALKABLE ONE-WAY OPTION AND
THEN DO SOME CURB LINES ON MAIN STREET TO MAKE IT EASIER IF THE CITY DECIDED IN THE FUTURE TO GO WITH A TWO-WAY OPTION. THEY ALSO RECOMMENDED
THAT THERE BE A FEASIBILITY TO STUDY AND SEE, CAN WE EVEN FIT TWO LANES OF BICYCLES? TWO LANES OF TRAFFIC ON MCKINLEY. SO AS YOU'RE GOING AROUND THE PLAZA, DOES THAT ALL FIT? CAN WE REALLY PULL IT OFF? THE PLANNING COMMISSION REJECTED THAT IDEA. THEY DECIDED THAT THEY WANTED TO GO WITH THE TOTAL TWO-WAY OPTION WITH SOME MINOR CHANGES. THEY WANTED TO ADD SOME
PARKING ON MAIN STREET AND SOME WIDER SIDEWALKS THAT WERE A PART OF THE WALKABLE ONE-WAY OPTION. THIS IS REALLY NOT A HYBRID OPTION. IT'S BASICALLY TWO WAYS. YOU CAN'T BE PARTLY PREGNANT HERE. WHEN THE CONSULTANTS SAID THERE WOULD BE A 5% TO 10% INCREASE IN TRAVEL TIME WITH
ANY OF THE OPTIONS, PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THEY DID NOT INCLUDE ANY OF THE BIG WITH IMPACTS FROM LEFT TURNS ON A TWO-WAY SCENARIO. YOU CAN PICTURE YOURSELF DRIVING IN THE TWO WAY. YOU NEED TO MAKE A LEFT INTO A PARKING LOT ONTO ANOTHER STREET, EVEN INTO YOUR OWN DRIVEWAY.
STEVE, YOU HAVE ABOUT 15 SECONDS.
OKAY, AND YOU HAVE TO WAIT FOR THE ONCOMING CARS TO MAKE THAT LEFT. THAT WAS NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE 5 TO 10% INCREASE IN TRAVEL TIME.
WHATEVER WE DO, WE'RE LOOKING AT HAVING TO DO MATCHING. END OF 20% MATCH.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM IF THERE IS
ANYONE ON ZOOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR AN ITEM NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND VIRTUALLY? SEEING NONE, I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS. >> HI, I AGREE WITH THE PIERCE FAMILY, AND LISA WROTE A VERY GOOD POST ON SEBASTOPOL TIMES ON THIS TOPIC. SO I WAS
TALKING TONIGHT ABOUT THE MICAH'S HUGS THING BECAUSE THE LAST MEETING, WE HAD A WHOLE ROOM OF PEOPLE. NONE OF WHOM LIVED HERE. THEY WERE INSULTING
AND ASKING THEM TO EDUCATE THEMSELVES ABOUT NARCAN AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. I THINK THAT WILL COME BACK UP ONTO THE AGENDA THAT WHERE SHE A
POLICE FORCE AND A FIRE, AND IF YOU FIND SOMEBODY LYING ON THE STREETS AND YOU THINK THEY'VE OVERDOSED, THE PROCEDURE IS TO CALL 911. WE'VE SEEN
THE POLICE AND THE FIRE SHOW UP, SAVE A WOMAN IN A BURNING HOUSE'S LIFE, VERY QUICKLY. A FEW WEEKS AGO. YOU KNOW, WE'RE IN A VERY DIFFICULT
SITUATION, WHERE WE HAVE NARCAN LYING AROUND AND PEOPLE WHO ARE MAYBE
DRUNK, TO SEE SOMEBODY LYING IN THE GUTTER, WHO MAY BE DIABETIC OR SOMETHING. IT COULD CAUSE WAY MORE PROBLEMS. WHEN IT COMES BACK UP FOR
THE MICAH'S HUGS THING, WE HAVE TO ASK OURSELVES, WHAT ARE WE ACHIEVING HERE? WE ALREADY HAVE A VERY EXPENSIVE POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO -- EMTs ARE WELL EQUIPPED TO DEAL WITH THESE KINDS OF SITUATIONS. SO HAVING
OLD NEWSPAPER BOXES WITH NARCAN IS A QUESTIONABLE VALUE IN THIS SITUATION. IT MAY COMPLICATE THINGS FOR THE PERSON WHO HAS COLLAPSED. SO
THE NEXT TIME THIS TOPIC COMES UP, IT WILL BE A BUNCH OF PEOPLE SHOUTING WE NEED NARCAN EVERYWHERE. IF YOU CARE ABOUT THIS, YOU SHOULD BE CARRYING
NARCAN YOURSELF, AND YOU SHOULD BE TAKING PERSONALITY RESPONSIBILITY, NOT
EXPECTING THE CITY TO TAKE THAT RISK, POSSIBLY HAVE A LOT OF LEGAL
DOWNSIDE TO THAT, IF SOMEBODY IS INJURED THROUGH SOMEBODY THAT DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO USE NARCAN, SO THAT IS MY COMMENT. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, OLIVER FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM.
JIM, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE?
THERE I GO.
CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
I CAN.
GREAT, GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
WILL SO I'M CALLING ALSO ON THE TOPIC OF THE TWO-WAY, ONE-WAY STREETS.
I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF ASKING CALTRANS AND GOING OUT AND TRYING TO FIND A
WHOLE BUNCH OF MONEY, WHICH WE DON'T KNOW IF WE COULD DO THE TWO-WAY STREET THING. I'VE BEEN ON THE FENCE ABOUT IT BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS BETTER. I WASN'T HERE IN 1985. I DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT IT WAS LIKE.
BUT I LOVE LISA'S NICE ARTICLE, LOOKING AT THE HISTORY. AND AT THIS
POINT, I ALSO DON'T LIKE THE PROCESS OF THE CONSULTANT COMING UP WITH FOUR PLANS THAT WERE HARD TO DECIPHER WHAT HAPPENS. THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS. I WORK ON SOUTH MAIN STREET, AND I RIDE MY BIKE AROUND TOWN. I FEEL COMFORTABLE THE WAY THINGS ARE. SOUTH MAIN STREET, ONE OF THE TWO LANES, HEAD DOWN 116, SOUTH OF TOWN. IT'S TOO FAST AND THERE IS TOO MUCH.
BUT THEN ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE'S THESE WIDE TIMES WHERE THE STOPLIGHT HAS STOPPED ALL TRAFFIC, AND YOU CAN GET ACROSS QUITE SAFELY. AND THERE
ARE PUSH BUTTONS ON THE LIGHTS YOU COULD USE THAT COULD SLOW THE TRAFFIC DOWN. SO I THINK RUSHING INTO SOMETHING AND ASSUMING THAT OUR TOWN WANTS TWO WAY IS A MISTAKE. AND I WOULD RATHER DO INCREMENTAL CHANGES AND/OR TRY THINGS OUT AND EXPERIMENT. WIDER SIDEWALKS DOWNTOWN WOULD BE GREAT.
YOU KNOW, THE BIKE LANE THING. I COULD GET AROUND WITHOUT NEEDING A LOT OF BIKE LANES. BUT I KNOW CALTRANS WILL REQUIRE BIKE LANES AND THAT'S A GOOD THING FOR THE FUTURE. ANY WAY, I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF WHAT CAME OUT OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND I WOULD LOVE TO TALK SOME MORE WHEN THE CITY COUNCIL TAKES IT UP. THANK YOU.
AND ALL RIGHT, I COULD MAKE A COMMENT TOO. NEXT TIME. >> OKAY, THANK YOU, JIM, AND I'LL COME BACK TO YOU. IS THERE ANYONE IN ZOOM, I'M SORRY,
IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR AN ITEM NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA? PLEASE COME UP TO THE PODIUM.
GOOD MORNING, LONG DAY, GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS CRAIG, AND I'M IN THE CLUB, AND I'M A GRANGER, SEBASTOPOL GRANGE. FIRST OFF, THANK YOU TO THE SCOUTS FOR EVERYTHING YOU DO FOR US, FOR THE THIRD OF JULY. I'M HERE TONIGHT TO TALK ABOUT THE BOX BUILD THAT'S HAPPENING ON SUNDAY, APRIL 12.
IT'S FROM 11:00 TO 3:00. LAST YEAR, WE BUILT 37 GARDEN BOXES FOR THE COMMUNITY. WE GAVE THEM AWAY TO FOLKS WHO WANTED TO GROW HABITAT FOR GOOD PLANTS OR SPECIES AND ALSO FOR FOLKS WHO WERE FEELING FOOD INSECURE. SO THAT WAS A COLLABORATION LAST YEAR BETWEEN THE SEBASTOPOL GRANGE 306 AND THE CLUB OF SEBASTOPOL. THIS YEAR WE'RE DOING IT AGAIN, APRIL 12, FROM 11:00 A.M. TO 3:00 P.M. AGAIN AT THE SEBASTOPOL GRANGE, EXCEPT, THE DRUM ROLL, PLEASE. THE LION'S CLUB IS JOINING US AS WELL. SO NOW WE'VE ADDED A THIRD GROUP, AND WE HAVE THREE OF US WORKING TOGETHER, COLLABORATIVELY.
I'D LIKE TO INVITE THE CITY TO COME ON OUT IF YOU'D LIKE TO. THE SCOUTS,
OF COURSE, AND AGAIN, THANK YOU TO THE SCOUTS FOR ALL THE WORK YOU DO FOR QUANTUS CLUB IN OUR COMMUNITY. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT.
NEXT, I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. DID YOU WANT TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT? YES, PLEASE.
ALL RIGHT, CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER STILL?
YES.
OKAY. GO AHEAD WITH YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE.
OKAY, THANKS. I'M GOING TO READ THE COMMENT I PUT IN THE SEBASTOPOL TIMES AFTER LISA'S PIECE. LISA PIERCE'S PIECE. KUDOS AND GRATITUDE TO LISA
PIERCE, WHO STUDIED THE HISTORY OF OUR TOWN FOR MANY, MANY YEARS, MADE VIDEOS ABOUT IT, AND CAREFULLY STUDIED MAPS AND PLANS. FOR HER CONSCIENTIOUS CLEAR-HEADED RECOUNTING OF RELEVANT HISTORY. WHY REPEAT MISTAKES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN MADE? ANY SOLUTION THAT COULD INCREASE
TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AND GRIDLOCK MUST BE DEEPLY SCRUTINIZED AND NOT RUSHED THROUGH. CONSULTANTS WHO DON'T LIVE HERE, REMEMBER, THE IVES PARK PROPOSAL TO DO AWAY WITH OUR BELOVED BALL FIELD? EVEN OUR LOCAL PLANNING
COMMISSION, NO MATTER HOW WELL INTENTIONED OR VISIONARY ARE NOT
THEMSELVES ELECTED OFFICIALS, BUT CAN HAVE AN OUTSIZED INFLUENCE OVER
THEM AND OVER THE TOWN WITH LITTLE TO NO ACCOUNTABILITY WHEN THINGS GO WRONG, I MIGHT ADD OR IF AND WHEN. AND EVEN THOUGH WALKING AND BICYCLING
TO TOWN ARE IDEAL OPTIONS TO PROMOTE FOR THE NEARBY AND THE ABLE-BODIED,
THEY ARE NOT VIABLE FOR COASTAL TOWNS BEYOND PUBLIC TRANSIT OR FOR VISITORS OR PASSER THROUGHS FROM FAR AWAY. WE STILL MUST CONSIDER
DRIVERS, TRAFFIC FLOWS, AND PARKING ISSUES, AS CARS ARE A CURRENT REALITY
IN A RURAL TOWN WITH A COUPLE CITY BLOCKS AND TWO STATE HIGHWAYS PASSING THROUGH. LET'S PLEASE BE KIND TO ALL PARTIES INVOLVED, INCLUDING OUR BELOVED LOCAL BUSINESSES. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, KERRY FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS. ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA? SEEING NONE, I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. ROBERT, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? >> YES.
THANK YOU. CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER?
YEAH.
GO AHEAD WITH YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE. >> THIS IS QUICK. JUST TO ADD TO OLIVER'S COMMENT ON THE NARCAN BOXES. PARTICULARLY THE INPUT WE GOT
FROM A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT APPARENTLY DON'T LIVE IN SEBASTOPOL AND HAVE NO REAL SKIN IN THE GAME. ONE OF THE COMMENTERS, I BELIEVE WAS HEAD OF A GROUP, NON-PROFIT GROUP. SAID THIS IS HAPPENING ALL OVER THE STATE. IN
FACT, QUOTED THE SPECIFIC PLACE WHERE THESE BOXES WERE BEING PLACED, YOU KNOW, WE'RE BEHIND THE TIMES, I GUESS. I HAPPEN TO BE IN SAN LUI S OBISPO AND THEY'RE NOT PUTTING BOXES ON THE STREETS. THEY DID PUT SOME SMALL
BOXES THAT LOOKED LIKE A FIRST AID KIT THAT HANG ON THE WALL INSIDE
PUBLIC BUILDINGS AT A LEVEL THAT WAS SUFFICIENTLY HIGH ENOUGH THAT
CHILDREN WOULDN'T BE PLAYING WITH IT, MAKING IT ACCESSIBLE BROADLY IN THE CITY. BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED AT THE MEETING. I THINK WE WERE BEING MISLED BY PEOPLE WHO GAVE THIS ADVICE TO US. SOMEHOW WE HAVE TO TURN ON OUR SPIDEY SENSES AND SENSE WHEN THINGS DON'T MAKE SENSE.
THANK YOU.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL COME BACK INTO PUBLIC CHAMBERS. IF THERE IS ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT --
HI, MY NAME IS RUSSELL. I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TONIGHT. I AM THE SENIOR PATROL LEADER OF SCOUTING AMERICA SEBASTOPOL TROOP 27, AND I'M PROUD TO BE HERE WITH MY AMAZING TROOP
BESIDE ME, AS WELL AS THOSE WHO COULD NOT BE HERE TODAY, SUCH AS MY SCOUT MASTER, MR. GRAVES. WE ARE AN ORGANIZATION THAT VALUES LEADERSHIP AND CIVIC DUTY. AS PART OF THIS, WE'VE BEEN PUTTING UP FLAGS ON MAIN STREET SINCE AT LEAST THE 1990s. WE DO THIS ON MOST STATE AND FEDERAL HOLIDAYS, WHICH IS VERY POPULAR TO THE PEOPLE OF SEBASTOPOL. PEOPLE THANK US AND
THEY HAVE ASKED US WHY THE FLAGS AREN'T UP WHEN WE UNFORTUNATELY CANNOT DO IT. HOWEVER, RECENTLY WE'VE RAN INTO AN ISSUE. WE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE
TO POST FLAGS RECENTLY AS IT HAS COME TO OUR ATTENTION WE POTENTIALLY
NEED A PERMIT FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL INSTANCE OF CARRYING OUT THIS COMMUNITY SERVICE. THIS IS PROVEN TO BE A LENGTHY PROCESS, AND WE OFTEN CANNOT GET A PERMIT IN TIME. SO WE ARE HERE AS A TROOP TO RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE FOLLOWING. WE ASK THE CITY AMEND ITS ORDINANCE REGARDING PERMITTING POSTING OF FLAGS ON MAIN STREET. WE'RE ASKING THE ORDINANCE EXPLICITLY ALLOW FOR THE POSTING OF U.S. FLAGS ON MAIN STREET. WE ALSO ASK THE
SERVICE WILL BE CONDUCTED IN PERPETUITY BY AN ORGANIZATION OF THE CITY'S CHOOSING, AND HUMBLY ASK THAT TROOP 27 BE RECOGNIZED AS THAT ORGANIZATION. SO YOU MAY BE ASKING WHY SHOULD TROOP 27 BE THE ONES TO PROVIDE THIS IMPORTANT SERVICE? SO I'D LIKE TO POINT OUT THE SCOUTS WHO ARE HERE WITH ME TONIGHT. NONE OF THEM ARE HERE BECAUSE THEY WERE FORCED TO BE. THEY'RE ALL HERE BECAUSE THEY WANT TO HAVE A PART IN CONTINUING TO PROVIDE SAFE AND CHEERFUL SERVICE TO THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL. WE'VE
CARRIED THIS OUT SUCCESSFULLY FOR DECADES AS A PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY AND OUR ORGANIZATION, WHICH WE HOPE TO CONTINUE.
YOU HAVE ABOUT TEN SECONDS LEFT.
THANK YOU. WORKING WITH THE CITY IS VERY VALUABLE TO US, AS IT LETS US
DEMONSTRATE OUR CIVIC PRIDE AND ENGAGE WITH THE VIBRANT COMMUNITY OF SEBASTOPOL. IF ANYMORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED, I'D BE HAPPY TO PROVIDE FURTHER DETAILS. ON BEHALF OF THE ENTIRETY OF TROOP 27, I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING OUR REQUEST.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. OMAR, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE?
GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, STAFF, AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. I AM SPEAKING OUT IN FULL FAVOR OF THE LAST COMMENT. I THINK THAT
THE SCOUTING OF AMERICA PROVIDES AN INCREDIBLE SERVICE TO THE CITY OF
SEBASTOPOL, WHEN WE HAVE THE FLAGS EACH HOLIDAY, AND I WANT TO THANK HIM FOR THAT. AS SOMEBODY WHO IS PROUD TO LIVE IN SEBASTOPOL, I THINK MY
SENSE OF CIVIC PRIDE IS HYPHENED EVERY TIME I SEE THE FLAGS, AND I DIDN'T
KNOW WHO PUT THEM UP, BUT I WANT TO THANK ALL OF YOU SCOUTS FOR DOING THAT. YOU'VE DONE REALLY WELL FOR OUR COMMUNITY, AND THANK YOU FOR SPEAKING OUT TODAY AND FOR SHOWING UP, AND FOR YOUR COMMUNITY SERVICE. SO I'M 100% IN FAVOR OF THIS. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, OMAR FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS. THIS WOULD BE THE TENTH SPEAKER, SO THIS WOULD BE OUR 20-MINUTE TIME LIMIT, SO I HAVE ONE MR. SPEAKER, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT. PLEASE COME UP TO THE PODIUM. SEEING NONE, I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. MYRIAH, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? >> I CAN, HI, EVERYBODY, GOOD EVENING. I'M JUST TAKING THIS OPPORTUNITY TO HOP ON REGARDING THE APPLE BLOSSOM FESTIVAL COMING UP, APRIL 25 AND 26. WE'RE DEEP INTO THE PLANNING FOR THE FESTIVAL. EVERYTHING IS GOING REALLY WELL. WE'VE GOT SOME REALLY FUN SURPRISES WITH YOU WITH THE WIZARD OF OZ THEME. I THINK IT WILL BE A GREAT WEEKEND. THAT BEING SAID, MY REASON FOR COMING TONIGHT
AMONG OTHER REASONS I WANT TO HEAR ABOUT ALL THE OTHER ISSUES THAT YOU ALL ARE DEALING WITH AT THE MOMENT IS VOLUNTEERS. VOLUNTEERS FOR THE FESTIVAL ARE CRUCIAL TO MAKE A SUCCESSFUL EVENT. WE NEED ABOUT 150 PEOPLE TO HAVE A STRONG VOLUNTEER TEAM OVER THE COURSE OF THE WEEKEND. IF YOU
WOULD LIKE TO BE INVOLVED AND VOLUNTEER, YOU CAN GO TO
APPLEBLOSSOMFEST.COM. THERE'S A LINK FOR VOLUNTEERING, AND WE APPRECIATE IT. YOU GET FREE TICKETS TO THE EVENT, AND REALLY CUTE TIE DYE T-SHIRT, SO THANK YOU.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. SO MAYOR, THAT IS THE 20-MINUTE TIME LIMIT FOR THE FIRST PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.
OKAY. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, EVERYONE FOR YOUR COMMENTS. AND WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ONTO -- OH, I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD.
I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR COMING TONIGHT TO THE BOY SCOUT GROUP, AND TO LET
YOU KNOW THAT I WILL BE SURE TO BRING AN AMENDMENT BACK FOR THE FLAG POLICY. SO IF YOU CAN GET YOUR LETTER TO OUR INTERIM CITY MANAGER, I'LL FOLLOW UP, OKAY? THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE? OKAY. OH. >> I ALSO WANT TO THANK THE SCOUT TROOP FOR DOING THIS SO OFTEN. YOU KNOW, NOT MANY PEOPLE KNOW WHO IT IS, SO IT'S GREAT FOR YOU TO COME UP AND PUT IT OUT THERE. HOPEFULLY WE CAN RECOGNIZE YOU GUYS A LITTLE BIT BETTER. THANK YOU.
OKAY, ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO OUR CONSENT CALENDAR. LET'S SEE. SO NUMBER ONE, APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3, 2026. APPROVAL OF SECOND READING FOR THE FORMULA BUSINESS ORDINANCE UPDATES. UPDATES TO THE FORMULA BUSINESS ORDINANCE TO CLARIFY APPLICABILITY AND TERMS. SEBASTOPOL
KIWANIS CLUB, NUMBER THREE, TO CONDUCT THEIR ANNUAL FIREWORKS SHOW ON JULY 3, 2026 LOCATED ON PUBLIC PROPERTY OF THE WEST SONOMA COUNTY UNION
HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, ANALY AVENUE, SEBASTOPOL, AND FINDING THIS ACTION EXEMPT UNDER CEQA SECTION 15304E. NUMBER FOUR. APPROVAL OF PROCESS FOR
TRANSITION TO SONOMA COUNTY PERMIT, FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION, ITEM FOR
THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL TO FILE A FORMAL RELINQUISHMENT LETTER WITH CAL EPA UNDER HSC 25404.3F, REQUESTING THAT CERTIFIED UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY,
CUPA, AUTHORITY FOR SEBASTOPOL BE ASSIGNED TO SONOMA COUNTY PERMIT,
SONOMA-FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION CUPA, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO
WORK WITH GOLD RIDGE TO EXECUTE AND SUBMIT ALL REQUIRED NOTICES,
CORRESPONDENCE, AND TRANSITION DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE TRANSFER. IF APPROVED BY CAL EPA, GOLD RIDGE AND CITY STAFF WILL RETURN WITH REMAINING ACTION ITEMS AS LISTED LATER IN THE REPORT. SO DOES ANYONE WANT TO PULL ANY ITEMS FROM CONSENT CALENDAR? NO? OKAY. THEN WE'LL GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
THANK YOU, MAYOR. SO THIS IS PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS JUST READ. IF YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THOSE FOUR
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS, AGAIN, IT IS A TWO-MINUTE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD, AND I'LL COME INTO CHAMBERS FIRST, THEN GO OUT TO ZOOM. DO YOU HAVE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM?
WELL THANK YOU FOR WELCOMING ME. MAYOR, MADAM MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, AND WORTHY CLERK AND ATTORNEY AND FINANCIAL CHAIR. I'M A MEMBER OF THE
KIWANIS, AND I WANT TO EXPRESS HOW WONDERFUL IT WAS TO USE THE SPACE
AROUND THE COMMUNITY CENTER LAST YEAR TO TRANSFORM THE FIREWORKS FROM A
BACK-TO-SCHOOL NIGHT AT THE SCHOOL, WHICH WAS A GREAT TRADITION, TO A TOWN PICNIC. I THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING US TO USE THE SPACE AGAIN, AND I
REALLY LOOK FORWARD TO PUTTING ON THIS YEAR'S TOWN PICNIC IN CONJUNCTION BY COHORT AT THE KIWANIS.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. IF
THERE IS ANYONE ON ZOOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ONLY, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND VIRTUALLY? SEEING NONE, WE'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS. IF ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD
LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ONLY, PLEASE COME UP TO THE PODIUM. SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENT IS CLOSED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS. >> OKAY. SO WE'RE BACK HERE. IF ANYONE HAS ANY COMMENTS OR MOTION?
I MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
I'LL SECOND. >> THANK YOU, SO MOVED BY VICE MAYOR MAURER AND SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ONE THROUGH FOUR. COUNCILMEMBER CARTER?
YES. >> COUNCILMEMBER HINTON?
AYE.
COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN?
YES.
VICE MAYOR MAURER? >> YES. >> MAYOR MCLEWIS?
YES. >> MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
PERFECT. WE ARE MOVING RIGHT ALONG. WE ARE AT THE POINT FOR INFORMATION ITEMS AND PRESENTATIONS, NUMBER 5. GOVERNMENT SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ANNUAL REPORT OUT. ANNUAL REPORT OF DEPARTMENT'S GOVERNMENT SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT.
I BELIEVE --WILL OUR CHIEF BE DOING THIS ITEM?
MAYOR, THERE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE CALENDAR AND WILL BE POSTPONED.
IT'S BEEN NOTICED ON THE AGENDA THAT WAY.
OH, I'M SORRY.
THAT'S OKAY. SO WE'LL GO NEXT TO THE PUBLIC HEARING.
I MADE A NOTE ON THE DIFFERENT AGENDA AND THEN I PRINTED A NEW ONE. ALL RIGHT. WE WILL MOVE TO NUMBER SIX. BOLD PROGRAM PARTICIPATION DISCUSSION AND ACTION. ITEM INCLUDES A PRESENTATION OF CMFA'S BOLD PROGRAM, A
RESOLUTION JOINING THE CMFA, AND A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE BOLD PROGRAM FOR THE CANOPY HOUSING PROJECT. ALL COSTS CAN BE REIMBURSED THROUGH THE BOLD PROGRAM. AND THIS, I BELIEVE, IS OUR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, PLANNING, A LOT OF DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS THERE. >> I'LL KICK US OFF, MAYOR. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL. SO THIS IS
AN ITEM THAT'S BEING BROUGHT TO YOU BY --ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPER OF THE CANOPY PROJECT WITHIN THE CITY. THEY'RE REQUESTING THE CITY AUTHORIZE
PARTICIPATION IN THE BOLD PROGRAM, WHICH IS A TOOL, A FINANCING TOOL THAT WILL HELP THEM PAY THE IMPACT FEE THE CITY IMPOSES ON NEW DEVELOPMENT. IT
IS AT NO COST TO THE CITY AND NO RISK OR LIABILITY FOR THE CITY, BUT IT DOES NEED THE CITY'S APPROVAL. AND WITH THAT, I'LL TURN IT OVER, I
THOUGHT I SAW SOME FROM CITY IN THE AUDIENCE, BUT MAYBE THEY'RE JUST ONLINE.
I'M GOING TO ASK JEAN WHO WILL BE PRESENTING CANOPY FOR THE BOLD PROJECT.
JEAN, I'M GOING TO MUTE YOU HERE REAL QUICK. JANE, CAN YOU UNMUTE
YOURSELF AND LET US KNOW WHO NEEDS ACCESS FROM THE CANOPY PROJECT IN BOLD TO PROVIDE THE PRESENTATION?
HI, YEAH. I DON'T SEE ANYONE WHOSE NAME I RECOGNIZE ON HERE RIGHT NOW, IF YOU ARE ON HERE, CAN YOU RAISE YOUR HAND?
I BELIEVE RALPH IS HERE TO MAKE THE PRESENTATION AS WELL OR TO ANSWER ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. >> YES, THERE WE GO. >> GOOD EVENING. I BELIEVE
THERE WAS SOMEONE FROM CITY VENTURES WHO WAS GOING TO START THE PRESENTATION, BUT IF NOT, I COULD GO AHEAD AND JUMP INTO IT.
WE JUST STARTED YOUR ITEM. I GAVE A LITTLE INTRODUCTION, BUT IF YOU WANT TO -- YEAH, PERFECT. >> DO WE HAVE THE SLIDES AVAILABLE? GIVE US A SECOND.
GREAT.
PLEASE.
WELL, WHILE WE'RE PULLING UP THE SLIDES, MY NAME IS KELSO. THANK YOU, MAYOR MCLEWIS, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. TONIGHT, OUR REQUEST IS OUTLINED
IN THE STAFF REPORT, BUT THE OVERALL REQUEST IS FOR THE CITY OF
SEBASTOPOL TO JOIN THE CMFA, WHICH IS THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE
AUTHORITY, WHICH WILL THEN ALLOW OUR COMPANY TO APPLY FOR THE BOLD FINANCING PROJECT, WHICH IS AN 80 TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT BEING CONSTRUCTED IN NORTH SEBASTOPOL, WHICH WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2024. THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED IT IN APRIL OF 2024 IN THE FINAL MAP THAT WAS APPROVED IN DECEMBER OF 2024. SO THAT'S OUR REQUEST TONIGHT, AND WE HAVE WITH US,
RALPH HOLMES WHO SHOULD BE ON ZOOM TO BE ABLE TO --HE'S A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BOLD PROGRAM. HE'LL BE ABLE TO GO OVER HOW -- OH, HERE WE ARE. >> CAN YOU LET ME KNOW WHEN TO MOVE FORWARD FOR YOUR SLIDE PRESENTATION? >> YEAH, WE CAN MOVE FORWARD. SO THIS WAS JUST THE AGENDA, LIKE THE OBJECTIVE THAT I DESCRIBED WHAT THE OBJECTIVE IS AND THE REQUEST IS. IF YOU CAN GO TO THE NEXT. NEXT SLIDE. THIS COMES FROM THE STAFF REPORT. YOU
KNOW, THE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW US TO APPLY FOR THE BOLD PROGRAM, AND FOR
THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL TO JOIN THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY. THE NEXT SLIDE SORT OF DISCUSSES WHAT THAT AUTHORITY IS. AND
RALPH WILL THEN TAKE IT OVER TO DESCRIBE WHAT THE BOLD PROGRAM IS IN
DETAIL, AND THEN I'LL BE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS SPECIFICALLY THAT YOU MAY HAVE AS IT RELATES TO THE CANOPY. SPECIFICALLY THE REQUEST TONIGHT TO ALLOW US TO APPLY TO JOIN THE BOLD PROGRAMS. THE RESOLUTION
ONLY SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZES THAT BOLD PROGRAM TO BE ALLOWED FOR THE
CANOPY PROJECT, SO WE CAN DISCUSS THAT LATER IN THE PRESENTATION, BUT
IT'S NOT A BLANKET APPROVAL THAT ANY PROJECT IN THE FUTURE SPECIFICALLY WOULD ONLY APPLY TO THE 80 HOMES BEING DEVELOPED AT THE CANOPY. SO RALPH CAN TAKE IT FROM HERE.
SURE, GREAT. WHY DON'T WE MOVE FORWARD TO SLIDE NUMBER SIX. SO FIRST OF ALL, MY NAME IS RALPH HOLMES, I WORK FOR PIPER. ONE OF THE BOLD PROGRAMS.
THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY IS A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY,
WHICH REPRESENTS CITIES, COUNTIES, SCHOOL DISTRICTS, AND OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES IN CALIFORNIA. AND THE SOLE PURPOSE TO ISSUE BONDS, TO FORM COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICTS, TO SUPPORT SOCIAL PROGRAMS. HOWEVER, OTHER
CITIES IN THE STATE ARE MEMBERS, AND SOME LOCAL CITIES INCLUDE WINDSOR, SANTA ROSA, NAPA. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE? SO THE BOLD PROGRAM IS SOMETHING WE
CREATED, WORK WITH CMFA TO ALLOW INFRASTRUCTURE, PUBLIC OWNED INFRASTRUCTURE BY CMFA ON BEHALF OF LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. ANY CMFA CAN PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM. IT WILL ALLOW TAX EXEMPT LOW COST FINANCING FOR THOSE PROJECTS. TO FACILITATE THE PROGRAM, WILL BE FORMED AND LATER BONDS WILL BE ISSUED. TYPICALLY WHEN WE POOL THEM, IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR LOW COST FINANCING FOR PROJECTS. THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, LATER ON, WE'LL DISCUSS A LITTLE BIT ABOUT HOW MANY WE WOULD ISSUE. NEXT SLIDE. SO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES IN THE DISTRICTS ARE FINANCING TOOL THAT ARE ALLOWED UNDER STATE LAW TO FUND PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE. INCLUDED IN THAT
INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDES GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, OPEN SPACE, SCHOOL FACILITIES, AND IMPACT FEES. THE BOLD PROGRAM WILL ALLOW FOR THE FUNDING OF THESE, AND ALSO CAN ALLOW FOR THE FUNDING OF SERVICES. NEXT SLIDE. SO IN ORDER TO JOIN THE PROGRAM, LOCAL AGENCY BECOMES A FEBRUARY. IT DOESN'T COST ANYTHING. THE LOCAL AGENCY THAT THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL TO HAVE A CONSULTANT PARTICIPATE, IT IF IT WISHES. AND THAT WOULD BE FUNDED AS A DEPOSIT. WE HAVE RESOLUTIONS IN FRONT OF YOU TO JOIN THE PROGRAM ON THE JOINT CMFA. JONES HALL IS OUR BOND COUNCIL, AND THEY'RE THE FIRM THAT DOES LEGAL WORK ON BEHALF OF CMFA. IN TERMS OF FUNDING THE IMPROVEMENTS
AND THE APPLICATION AGREEMENT WILL BE DRAFTED, THAT WILL COVER THE FUNDING OF THOSE IMPROVEMENTS. AT THE TIME, THE BONDS ARE ISSUED WHEN PROCEEDS ARE AVAILABLE. LOCAL AGENCY WILL ACCEPT THE COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS AND FEES. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE? SO WHY THE LOCAL AGENCIES? THE BIG REASON IS IT'S AN OUTSOURCING OF THE FORMATION BOND ISSUANCE PROCESS.
THERE IS NO COST TO THE PROGRAM. AND CMFA DOES EVERYTHING. ON THE
HOMEOWNERS TAX BILL, THERE IS A LINE ITEM THAT IS CMFA, AND IT DOES NOT SAY THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL. THERE IS NO ONGOING ADMINISTRATION REQUIRED BY THE CITY. SIMPLY PUT, ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS ACCEPT TO JOIN THE PROGRAM, THAT YOU WOULD ACCEPT THE IMPROVEMENTS OR THE FEES. NEXT SLIDE.
SO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. SO WITH SMALL PROJECTS, AND LARGE PROJECTS, BUT REDUCE PROJECTS AS SMALL AS $500,000. ANY DEVELOPER WILL NEED TO FORM THE DISTRICT. AND WHEN BONDS ARE ISSUED, THERE'S CERTAIN CRITERIA THAT HAVE TO BE MET. ALL DISCRETIONARY IMPROVEMENTS HAVE TO BE PLACED, A LIEN OF 4- 1, AND THE PROJECT MUST MEET THE CITY'S GOALS AND POLICIES. NEXT SLIDE.
GREAT. THE FORMATION PROCESS IS VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD. ONCE IT'S A MEMBER
OF BOLD, THE DEVELOPER WILL PROVIDE THE APPLICATION TO PARTICIPATE TO THE PROGRAM. WE WOULD REACH OUT TO CITY STAFF, AND WE WOULD CHECK IN TO MAKE SURE WHAT THE DEVELOPER WANTS TO DO IS OKAY WITH STAFF. ONCE THAT'S
APPROVED OR THE CITY STAFF SAYS YES, THEN WE GO FORWARD AND WORK ON THE
FORMATION OF THE CMFA THAT WILL GO THROUGH THE LEGAL PROCESS OF REFERRING THE CFD. IT TYPICALLY TAKES ABOUT THREE MONTHS. NEXT SLIDE. SO ONCE THEY'RE FORMED, NOW WE'RE IN A POSITION TO ISSUE BONDS ON THE PROJECT.
IT'S A SEPARATE PROCESS, BUT, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE TO FORM BEFORE YOU COULD ISSUE BONDS FOR THAT. AND TYPICALLY POOL FINANCING WILL NOTE THE LARGER FINANCING AGAIN TO SAVE MONEY, YOU KNOW, IN TERMS OF PROCESS. AND WE
WOULD LAY IT OUT HERE, THE PROCESS, BUT TYPICALLY IT WOULD TAKE ABOUT FOUR MONTHS. WE WOULD SELL THE BONDS TO INVESTORS. NEXT SLIDE. SO WE STARTED THE PROGRAM IN 2018. SO FOR ABOUT 70 LOCAL AGENCIES HAVE JOINED THE PROGRAM, REFORMED 110 CFDs, ISSUING ABOUT $675 MILLION IN BONDS FOR 70 DIFFERENT PROJECTS. AND THOSE PROJECTS WILL FUND THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR OVER 12,000 HOUSING UNITS. AND, YOU KNOW, CMFA IS ONE OF THEIR BIG POLICIES TO HELP, YOU KNOW, INCREASE THE SUPPLY HOUSE WITHIN THE STATE.
SO, YOU KNOW, IN 2026, WE'VE GOT TEN SAFETIES AND THE FORMATION AS OF NOW. WE WILL PROBABLY FORM BETWEEN 20 AND 30 BEFORE THE YEAR IS DONE.
WE'VE GOT SIX FINANCING SCHEDULES SO FAR. SO THINGS ARE MOVING RIGHT ALONG. LET ME GO AHEAD AND TURN IT BACK, I THINK IN TERMS OF THE CANOPY PROJECT. NEXT SLIDE. OH, I'M SORRY. I MISSED ONE. SO THIS IS A LISTING OF JURISDICTIONS THAT HAVE FORMED A PROGRAM. AGAIN, WE STARTED THIS PROGRAM IN 2018. IT REALLY DIDN'T GET GOING UNTIL 2020, BUT SINCE THEN, WE'VE PROBABLY ADDED FIVE TO EIGHT AGENCIES PER YEAR. AGAIN, WE'RE FORMING 25 TO 30 DISTRICTS IN HERE. NEXT SLIDE. I THINK I WILL TURN THIS BACK OR WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO TAKE THIS?
I CAN TAKE IT, RALPH.
CAN I INTERRUPT REAL QUICK. WE GENERALLY ALLOW TEN MINUTES FOR PRESENTATION. >> OKAY, WE'RE AT THE END. I APPRECIATE THAT, MADAM MAYOR.
JUST ON A HIGH LEVEL WHAT THE BOLD PROGRAM WOULD ALLOW US TO DO WOULD PAY
ALL OF OUR IMPACT FEES, WHICH ON THE SCREEN SHOWS ALL THE DIFFERENT IMPACT FEES THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL HAS. IT WOULD ALLOW US TO PAY THOSE IMPACT FEES, IF WE WERE ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY THE BOLD PROGRAM. I BELIEVE IT'S A LITTLE OVER $2.6 MILLION TO THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, RIGHT OFF THE BAT. AND INSTEAD OF WHAT THE CURRENT PROCESS IS, WE ARE ALLOWING NEW STATE LAWS TO REFER OUR IMPACT FEES. SO AS WE BUILD EACH PROJECT, WE DON'T HAVE TO PAY THE IMPACT FEES UNTIL THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. SO AS A RESULT, IT WILL TAKE A YEAR OR TWO TO BUILD OUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT.
ALL THE IMPACT FEES WOULD COME IN OVER TIME, OVER THE NEXT TWO TO THREE
YEARS, WHERE THROUGH THE BOLD PROGRAM, WE WOULD ALLOW, WE WOULD BE ABLE TO PAY ALL THOSE IMPACT FEES THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, RIGHT OFF THE BAT.
AND THE FUTURE HOMEOWNERS OF THE CANOPY PROJECT WOULD SEE AN ASSESSMENT ON THEIR BILL OVER THE NEXT TAX BILL OVER THE NEXT 30 YEARS. SO AT A VERY HIGH LEVEL, THAT'S WHAT THE BOLD PROGRAM IS AND WOULD ALLOW US TO DO. >> OKAY, THANK YOU.
AND I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND RALPH IS ALSO AVAILABLE.
YES, WE'RE GOING TO BRING IT BACK TO THE DAIS HERE. I SEE COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN HAS HIS HAND UP.
THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU FOR THE HIGH LEVEL BECAUSE THAT WAS A LOT, A LOT ON SLIDES I COULD NOT READ. BUT THE UPSHOT I GOT FROM THE STAFF REPORT IS AGAIN WHAT YOU JUST SAID. IF WE APPROVE THIS, WE'LL GET ALL OF OUR MONEY SOON, LIKE YOU MENTIONED, $2 MILLION. IF WE APPROVE IT TONIGHT, THEN WHEN WILL WE GET THE CHECK FOR THE $2 MILLION? I JUST NEED TO BE FRANK WITH THAT THINLY STAFFED CITY HERE. WE DO NOT, FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, NEED TO GET A MESH ON THINGS UNLESS THE PAYOFF IS QUICK.
ABSOLUTELY. AND I DO WANT TO NOTE THE BOLD PROGRAM, THERE WOULD BE NO STAFF TIME. THERE WOULD BE VERY LIMITED STAFF TIME. WE WOULD OBVIOUSLY PAY FOR ALL THAT. BUT IF RALPH IS STILL AVAILABLE, I BELIEVE IT IS LATE
SUMMER, BUT HE WOULD BE ABLE TO BETTER SPEAK EXACTLY WHEN THAT WOULD OCCUR.
SO WHAT DRIVES THE TIMING IS THE PROJECT ITSELF. MY UNDERSTANDING IS WE'RE THERE IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. WE ARE PROBABLY LOOKING LATE SUMMER TO EARLY FALL.
OKAY. COUNCILMEMBER? OH , I'M SORRY. DID YOU HAVE YOUR HAND UP? YOU KNOW, IT IS ONLY A COUPLE OF YEARS UNTIL ALL OF THESE FINISH. DEAR
SCOUTS, THIS IS WHY YOU GO TO SCHOOL, SO YOU CAN DO SOME MATH HOMEWORK AND STUFF LIKE THAT. SO I DID SOME CALCULATIONS. AND I TRY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE HOMEOWNERS FOR THIS. SO WHAT YOU'RE DOING
IS YOU'RE BASICALLY ASSIGNING A BOND TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND IT IS BEING ATTACHED TO THIS FOR THE NEXT 30 YEARS. THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO OPT OUT OF IT. THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO SELL OUT. YOU KNOW, YOU CAN PAY OFF YOUR MORTGAGE EARLY, BUT YOU CAN'T PAY THIS OFF EARLY. THIS WILL ADD ANOTHER MAYBE $200 TO $300 ONTO EVERYBODY'S MORTGAGE, ABOUT $900,000. SO I CALCULATED. MAYBE
YOU WOULD, AND TRUST ME, I LOVE CITY VENTURES AND I'M SO GLAD YOU BUILT HERE, LIKE I WANT TO SUPPORT YOU GUYS. BUT I THINK THIS WOULD ADD ABOUT $200,000 OR $300,000 TO YOUR BENEFIT FOR THE PROJECT, WHICH ISN'T SUPER SIGNIFICANT. AND FOR US, LIKE IT MAY NOT SAVE THAT MUCH MONEY. YOU KNOW,
IF IT WERE LIKELY YOU WEREN'T GOING TO FINISH THESE, YOU KNOW, THAT WOULD BE A CONCERN. WE WOULD LIKE IT UPFRONT. THAT WOULD BE DIFFERENT. HOWEVER,
YOU KNOW, IT APPEARS THAT THE HOMEOWNER MIGHT BE ON THE HOOK FOR LIKE $190,000 OVER THE TERM OF --AND THAT'S 62 INDIVIDUALS THAT WOULD HAVE THIS AMOUNT ATTACHED TO THEIR MORTGAGE FOR THAT AMOUNT. SO THERE IS A
SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT THE HOMEOWNERS ARE OBLIGATED TO OVER THESE 30 YEARS AND THE BENEFIT TO YOU AND FOR THE CITY. SO I'M KIND OF
CONCERNED ABOUT THAT AND WONDERING BECAUSE MAYBE WE SHOULD LEAVE THIS TO
THE MARKET AND THEY COULD USE THEIR MORTGAGE FOR THAT SAVINGS OF $20,000, RATHER THAN THIS DEVICE TO SAVE SOME MONEY TO INCENTIVIZE SOME HOUSE BUILDING BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE THERE WOULD BE ABOUT $60,000 TO $90,000 OFF THE HOME PRICE GUARANTEED THAT YOU WOULD NEED. IT WOULD WORK OUT FOR THE HOME BUYER. AND BECAUSE HOUSING PRICES CAN VARY. THERE WAS NO
GUARANTEE IN YOUR STATEMENT ABOUT EXACTLY HOW MUCH YOU WOULD REDUCE THE PRICE BY.
SO WE PARTICIPATE IN THE BOLD PROGRAM THROUGHOUT THE STATE AND OTHER
JURISDICTIONS THAT ARE ALREADY MEMBERS OF CMFA AND PARTICIPATE IN THE BOLD PROGRAM. JOINING THE BOLD PROGRAM ALLOWS US TO DO, NOT JUST, YOU KNOW, WE'VE DISCUSSED PAYING THE IMPACT FEES RIGHT AWAY. BUT WHAT IT ALSO
ALLOWS US TO DO IS REDUCE THE PRICES OF THE HOME OR BUY DOWN MORTGAGES FOR BUYERS, SO THEY COULD HAVE MORE BUYING POWER. SO IT IS NOT FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE. IT'S WIN, WIN. FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND, TWO THINGS, ONE, THE ASSESSMENT IS FULLY DISCLOSED THROUGH THE PROCESS. IF ANY FUTURE
HOMEOWNER HERE WOULD BE FULLY AWARE OF THIS ANNUAL ASSESSMENT, BUT ALSO
FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND THROUGH, YOU KNOW, MARKETING AGENTS AND OTHER COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE PARTICIPATED IN. THE BUYERS ARE -- I UNDERSTAND YOU'RE SORT OF LOOKING OUT FOR THOSE FUTURE HOMEOWNERS. BUT
COUNTERINTUITIVELY ALMOST, I DON'T KNOW IF THAT IS THE RIGHT WORD, AND
OTHER COMMUNITIES APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS
PROGRAM BECAUSE IT REDUCES --BECAUSE IT ALLOWS US TO NOT ONLY REDUCE THE
PRICE, BUT ALSO CREATE MORE INCENTIVES IN TERMS OF LIKE I SAID, BUYING DOWN THE MORTGAGE. >> BUT THAT PRODUCTION ISN'T GUARANTEED. THERE IS NO QUANTITY THAT YOU'RE ABLE TO SAVE SPECIFICALLY, YOU KNOW? THAT IS THE POSSIBILITY FOR IT, BUT IS THAT POSSIBILITY GOING TO HAPPEN? OH, ABSOLUTELY. I MEAN, WE'VE ALREADY -- OBVIOUSLY IT DEPENDS ON HOW
TONIGHT GOES, BUT WE HAVE PLANNED TO --WE NEED TO JOIN THE BOLD PROGRAM
BEFORE WE CAN START ACTUALLY SELLING HOMES, AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE READY TO START SELLING HOMES. BUT I MEAN, WE CAN START SELLING HOMES ONE WAY OR
ANOTHER, BUT WE HAVE A MARKETING STRATEGY BASED ON IF WE WERE LUCKY
ENOUGH TO BE ABLE TO JOIN THE BOLD PROGRAM THAT WOULD HAVE A WIDE VARIETY
OF DIFFERENT INCENTIVES FOR BUYERS, INCLUDING REDUCED HOME PRICES FROM
WHAT WE WERE ORIGINALLY PROJECTING, AND ALSO THE AVAILABILITY TO BUY DOWN MORTGAGE RATES BETWEEN 3% TO 4%, WHICH IS CURRENTLY MUCH LOWER THAN WHAT THE MARKET IS. AND IT ALSO ALLOWS US TO BUILD OUT AND DEVELOP THE PROJECT FASTER. FOR EXAMPLE, LIKE TO YOUR POINT EARLIER, IF WE LET THE MARKET
DECIDE, THEN THE CURRENT MARKET, IN TERMS OF ABSORPTION AND HOW QUICKLY
HOME SALES ARE HAPPENING, THAT COULD TAKE POSSIBLY TWO, THREE, FOUR YEARS WITH THOSE ADDED INCENTIVES. WE ANTICIPATE THAT IT WOULD TAKE. IT WOULD BE A FASTER PROCESS.
VICE MAYOR? >> SO I JUST WANT TO VERIFY. YOU SAID TO THE ATTORNEY, THERE IS NO COST, NO RISKS, AND NO LIABILITIES TO THE CITY?
THAT'S RIGHT.
THAT'S CORRECT. >> AND THE SECOND QUESTION IS ABOUT STAFF TIME. WE'RE SHORT STAFFED. HOW MUCH STAFF TIME WILL THIS REQUIRE?
LESS THAN FIVE HOURS. VERY MINIMAL STAFFING. >> HOW MUCH OVER THE NEXT THREE MONTHS?
CAN I SPEAK TO THAT? SO IN TERMS OF STAFF TIME, WE'LL HAVE, YOU KNOW, SEVERAL CONFERENCE CALLS LESS THAN AN HOUR EACH. ALL THE STAFF TIME WILL BE REIMBURSABLE FROM THE DEPOSIT THAT THE DEVELOPER WILL MAKE. >> OKAY.
SO JUST A COUPLE MORE QUESTIONS. WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE CMFA PROGRAM FOLDED? WHAT HAPPENS THEN?
THEN ANOTHER, YOU KNOW, ORGANIZATION WOULD HAVE TO TAKE IT OVER. I DON'T KNOW. IT'S A PUBLIC AGENCY.
SO THE TAX WILL ALREADY BE ON THE ASSESSMENT RULES THEN? IT EXISTS AND PUBLIC AGENCIES CAN'T GO AWAY. SO THEY WOULD CONTINUE TO HAVE TO EXIST IN SOME FORM AND THE TAXES HAVE BEEN APPROVED ON THE PROPERTY TAX ROLE.
BUT IT WON'T FALL BACK TO THE CITY?
NO.
OKAY. AND MY LAST QUESTION IS THEN SO DO BUYERS SAVE MONEY OR IS THIS MONEY THAT'S ADDED AS --IS THERE INTEREST ON THIS MONEY THAT THEY OWE? DO YOU WANT TO TAKE THAT ROUTE? >> I COULD TAKE A RUN AT THAT. SOMETHING
TO POINT OUT IS THAT BECAUSE OF YOUR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, WE COULD FUND THESE IMPROVEMENTS WITH TAX DOLLARS. SO THE INTEREST RATE ON THEM ARE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THAN THEIR MORTGAGE RATE. SO IF THEY'RE GOING TO PAY
FOR THE HOUSE WITH, YOU KNOW, MORTGAGE RATES, THEY'RE GOING TO BE FUNDING IT AT A 6% TO 6.5% RATE. FOR THE COMPONENT WE'RE FUNDING WITH THE BOLD PROCEEDS, THE INTEREST RATE IS CONSIDERABLY LESS. IT IS MORE OF THE FIVE AND QUARTER RANGE.
OKAY, THANK YOU. >> AND JUST TO BRIEFLY ADDRESS THAT. THE ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT THAT WOULD BE ON THE TAX BILL, THAT WOULD BE THE SAME AMOUNT FOR 30 YEARS. SO THAT WOULDN'T GO UP OR DOWN. IT WOULD BE THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT. IN TERMS OF THE MORTGAGE RATE THAT RALPH JUST EXPLAINED AGAIN. TO
BE A PART OF THE PROGRAM WOULD ALLOW US TO HELP SOME FIRST TIME HOME BUYERS, YOUNG FAMILIES PAY DOWN THE MORTGAGES. SO CURRENT MORTGAGE RATES ARE BETWEEN 6% TO 6.5%, BUT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO OFFER INCENTIVES THAT WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, BUY DOWN MORTGAGE RATES, SO THEY'RE CLOSER BETWEEN 3% TO 4.5%.
SO I'M JUST GOING TO ASK A QUICK QUESTION. JUST FOR CLARITY BECAUSE I
HEAR ALL THESE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS, AND I'VE READ THIS, BUT YET I STILL FEEL LIKE THERE NEEDS TO BE CLARITY. IF WE HAD A $900,000 HOME, HOW DOES THIS IMPACT? I MEAN, I TRULY WANT TO HAVE SOME NUMBERS HERE. IF WE'RE SAYING SOMEONE WAS PURCHASING A HOME FOR $900,000, EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT THE BENEFITS ARE AND WHAT COST THIS IS TO THEM. I MEAN, JUST MAKE IT VERY SIMPLE FOR ALL OF US TO BETTER UNDERSTAND. >> VERY SIMPLE. I'LL SAY TWO THINGS. ONE, ON THAT $900,000 HOME, THERE'S ROUGHLY ABOUT $45,000 OF
IMPACT FEES, SO THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL WILL GET THAT RIGHT AWAY INSTEAD OF THE NEXT FEW YEARS. AND THAT HOMEOWNER WOULD HAVE AN ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT ON THEIR TAX ROLL OF ROUGHLY $3,200 A YEAR. SO TWICE IN
DECEMBER AND APRIL EVERY YEAR WHEN WE PAY OUR PROPERTY TAXES, THEY WOULD BE PAYING ABOUT $1,600 IN ADDITION. >> IN ADDITION? >> THAT WOULD BE FULLY DISCLOSED AND BEFORE THEY ACQUIRE, YOU KNOW, PURCHASE THE HOME.
THEY'D BE AWARE OF THAT.
SO THAT WOULD BE A COST ON TOP OF WHATEVER ELSE?
ON TOP OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX ALREADY, IF THERE ARE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS FOR FIRE OR ANY OTHER SORT OF ASSESSMENT THE AREA HAS ON YOUR TAX BILL.
OKAY.
IT WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL.
GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN.
THANK YOU. FIRST, HOW DOES THAT HELP THE FAMILIES THEN? THAT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE THAT WOULD BE A WIN FOR A FAMILY, FROM WHAT I JUST HEARD.
FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO KNOW, IT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF OTHER MUNICIPALITIES THAT ARE JUMPING ON THIS BANDWAGON. YOU RATTLED OFF A FEW IN THE BEGINNING. WHO LOCALLY HAS JUMPED ON THE BANDWAGON, AT LEAST WITHIN SONOMA COUNTY? SO TWO QUESTIONS.
I'LL TAKE THE FIRST QUESTION, AND THEN I THINK RALPH CAN ADDRESS THE
SECOND QUESTION BECAUSE BOLD ALSO HAS A COW SIN, SKIP, WHICH I KNOW A LOT OF LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES PARTICIPATE. BUT IN TERMS OF HELPING THE FAMILIES. IF YOU'RE PAYING, YOU KNOW, IF YOUR MONTHLY MORTGAGE IS BASED ON A 4, 4.5% RATE VERSES A 6% RATE, SO THAT WOULD HELP THE FAMILY. AND
SO, YOU KNOW, IN SOME WAYS FROM SOME OF THE CALCULATIONS WE'VE DONE, IT
ACTUALLY WORKS OUT TO BE, IN TERMS OF YOUR OVERALL ANNUAL HOUSING COST, LESS, INCLUDING THE TAX. OR YOU HAVE A LOWER PROPERTY -- IF WE ARE NOT BUYING DOWN A MORTGAGE, WE ARE JUST OFFERING HOMES FOR A LOWER PRICE.
THAT OBVIOUSLY REFLECTS BASED ON A LOWER PROPERTY TAX BASIS, WHICH OVER TIME ALSO HELPS THE HOMEOWNER. >> GO AHEAD, VICE MAYOR. >> SO HOW MUCH IS EACH PROPERTY GOING TO BE DEFERRING THEN? >> I'M SORRY? HOW MUCH WOULD EACH PROPERTY BE --HOW MUCH IS GOING TO BE DEFERRED? WAS IT $30,000? IS THAT WHAT YOU SAID ON IMPACT FEES?
OH, WELL, EACH PROPERTY, THE IMPACT FEES ARE BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, SO EACH, YOU KNOW, DEPENDING ON THE PLANNED TYPE, IT WOULD BE DIFFERENT.
BUT IT'S ROUGHLY ABOUT, I WOULD SAY BETWEEN $30,000 TO $40,000 OF IMPACT FEES. SO I WORK WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO PULL OUR BUILDING PERMITS AS WE GO BUILDING BY BUILDING. AND, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE THE ENTIRE, LIKE A
BUILDING PERMIT FOR, YOU KNOW, YOUR AVERAGE UNIT IS ROUGHLY BETWEEN $50,000 TO $60,000, BUT WE SEND IN A CHECK FOR $18,000. AND THEN, WE LIST OUT ALL THE IMPACT FEES THAT WE'RE DEFERRING. SO IT IS ROUGHLY ABOUT THAT AMOUNT. THEN IN TERMS OF THE OTHER MUNICIPALITIES, RALPH, I KNOW WE HAD A SLIDE ABOUT THAT. TO YOUR POINT, IT WAS HARD TO READ. IF YOU COULD GO OVER SOME OF THE OTHER MUNICIPALITIES THAT HAVE JOINED BOLD? SURE. TYPICALLY THIS PROGRAM IS UTILIZED WHERE IN COMMUNITIES THEY'RE BUILDING NEW HOMES. AND SO WHERE WE REALLY SEE IT IS THE VACAVILLE, FAIRFIELD. WE SEE IT IN PITTSBURG, SKIP IS IN BRENTWOOD, THE CONTINUED PROGRAM. WE'RE ALL OVER THE CENTRAL VALLEY, WHERE A LOT OF HOMES ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED. PLACER COUNTY, ROSEVILLE, ROCKLAND, LINCOLN, RANCHO
CORDOVA, THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, AND THEN WE'RE DOWN THE VALLEY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AS WELL. AS I MENTIONED. 70 DIFFERENT HAVE JOINED THE PROGRAM.
COUNCILMEMBER HINTON HAS A QUESTION.
YES. SO JUST KIND OF STUDYING IT. IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU COULD LOWER THE MORTGAGE BECAUSE OF THEIR TAX EXEMPT. THE DIFFERENCE ON A $900,000 LOAN BETWEEN 4% AND THE MARKET 6.5% ON A QUICK CALCULATION IS ABOUT $68,000 A YEAR IN INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL. BUT YOU'RE SAYING THEN IT'S DISCLOSED THEIR PROPERTY TAXES GO UP $1,800 OVERALL. SO THAT SEEMS LIKE A HUGE COST SAVINGS TO THE HOMEOWNER, JUST ON A QUICK MATH. IT WOULD BE GREAT IF YOU
HAD SHOWED US THE MATH BECAUSE I THINK POINT OF ENTRY IS REALLY DIFFICULT WITH THE INTEREST RATES.
ABSOLUTELY. >> FOR NEW HOME BUYERS, THAT'S THE DIFFICULT PART. THIS SYSTEM HELPS BREAK THAT DOWN. THAT'S WHAT I'M HEARING?
EXACTLY. BECAUSE YOUR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT, AGAIN, THESE ARE AVERAGES, WILL BE ROUGHLY $3,200. AND SO, YOU KNOW, IT'S ABOUT $250, $275 A MONTH
ADDITIONAL TAX, BUT TO YOUR POINT, YOU WOULD BE SAVING, DEPENDING WHETHER YOU'RE AT 6%, 6.5%, VERSES 4.5% MORTGAGE, YOU'LL BE SAVING MORE. SO TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION, WHAT'S IN IT FOR THE BUYER? THAT'S WHAT'S IN IT FOR THE BUYER.
OKAY, WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE HERE. I DON'T KNOW. GO AHEAD.
JUST TO CLARIFY, YOU KEEP SAYING 4%, AND I'M KIND OF CURIOUS ABOUT THE
LIKELIHOOD OF THAT OR HOW CAN WE BE SURE THAT THIS IS WHAT'S GOING TO BE PASSED ON TO THE BUYER OR IT COULD BE? THAT MIGHT BE A DIFFICULT THING TO SAY. IT'S A SUPER GREAT MARKETING STORY. OVER TIME IF YOU CAN CUT THE INTEREST RATE. THAT'S A GREAT THING TO DO. IF YOU CAN ONLY CUT THE PRICE BY MAYBE $20,000 OFF THE HOUSE, MAKE IT AN $880,000, INSTEAD OF $900,000, IT'S NEGLIGENTABLE. IF YOU GO DOWN TO FOUR, THAT'S WILDLY DIFFERENT, BUT
I'M NOT REALLY SURE HOW YOU'D BE ABLE TO DO THAT OFF OF THIS AMOUNT, LIKE IT DOESN'T SEEM TO WORK OUT.
WELL, AT OUR CURRENT COMMUNITIES THAT ARE SELLING IN THE BAY AREA, INCLUDING JUST UP THE ROAD IN SANTA ROSA. IF YOU GO TO OUR WEBSITE, WE
OFFER THE ABILITY TO, YOU KNOW, BUY DOWN YOUR MORTGAGE, LIKE ON OUR WEBSITE, PROMOTES 4 POINT SOMETHING PERCENT MORTGAGES. AGAIN, JUST THE CURRENT MARKET, WHICH WE'RE ALL AWARE OF. HOME BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
ARE OFFERING THOSE TYPES OF INCENTIVES BECAUSE ULTIMATELY FOR HOME BUYERS AND CITIES AND DEVELOPERS TO SELL THESE HOMES THAN HAVE THEM SIT. IN THE WAY WE DEVELOPED TOWN HOMES, WE BUILT BUILDING BY BUILDING. WE DIDN'T
START UNTIL THE NEXT PREVIOUS BUILDING WAS HALF SOLD AND THE BUILDING BEFORE THAT WAS FULLY SOLD. SO IF THEY'RE NOT MOVING IN THE CURRENT MARKET. IT'S GOING TO TAKE MUCH LONGER TO BUILD UP THE PROJECT. WHAT THIS
WILL ALLOW US TO DO IS ULTIMATELY, YOU KNOW, IN OUR VIEW, AND I THINK THE
VIEW OF THE BUYERS THAT WE'VE HEARD FROM THESE COMMUNITIES IS A BETTER PROPOSITION FOR THEM AND FOR US AND FOR THE CITY. SO THAT'S WHEN I KEEP SAYING WIN, WIN, I TRULY BELIEVE THE PROGRAM REPRESENTS THAT.
VICE MAYOR? >> SO CAN THESE FEES BE PAID OFF EARLY BY THE HOMEOWNER? YES.
YEP. >> OKAY, GREAT, THANK YOU. >> AND A QUESTION I HAVE IS, YOU KNOW, THE QUESTION SAYS WILL THE SPECIAL TAX HURT FUTURE HOME BUYERS? HOW DOES THIS IMPACT FUTURE HOME SELLERS AT ALL, IF ANY? YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? TEN YEARS DOWN THE ROAD? >> SO AT TEN YEARS FROM DOWN THE ROAD, LET'S SAY SOMEBODY WHO BOUGHT THE HOUSE WHEN IT WAS BUILT SOLD THE HOUSE. THAT
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT WILL CONTINUE WITH THAT HOUSE UNTIL IT'S PAID OFF, UNTIL THE BOND IS PAID OFF UNTIL 30 YEARS. AGAIN, THAT WOULD BE A PART OF THE SALES DISCLOSURE AND EVERYONE WOULD BE FULLY AWARE OF THAT. AFTER 30 YEARS, IT'S ALWAYS 30 BE YEARS, RIGHT, RALPH?
YES.
IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO SCHOOL BONDS OR HOSPITAL BONDS OR FIRE DISTRICTS, YOU KNOW? IT IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE TYPE OF BONDS. A LOT OF US ALREADY SEE ON OUR TAX ROLL AND THEY ARE GENERALLY 30 YEARS.
OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OH, GO AHEAD.
I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THE BUYER WHO IS OBLIGATED TO THIS TAX AND
THE TAX STAYS WITH THE HOUSE OR IT STAYS WITH THE MORTGAGE, AND THEY ARE
ABLE TO PAY IT OFF EARLY, BUT IT'S THE FULL AMOUNT FOR PAYING IT OFF EARLY? >> YEAH. SO IT'S THE FULL AMOUNT FOR PAYING IT OFF EARLY. SO IT IS WITH THE HOUSE.
I'M SORRY.
YOU'RE ASKING IS THERE A BENEFIT TO PAYING IT OFF EARLY? I WOULD ARGUE NO.
CAN HOMEOWNERS USE THIS AS A TAX WRITE OFF OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? I'M JUST CURIOUS. >> IT'S A GREAT QUESTION. RALPH, CAN HOMEOWNERS --BECAUSE I KNOW YOU CAN FOR SOME PROPERTY TAXES. CAN YOU USE THIS AS A TAX WRITE OFF?
I BELIEVE THEY DO. I'M NOT A TAX ACCOUNTANT, BUT I BELIEVE HOMEOWNERS DO.
TO THE EXTENT YOU CAN WRITE OFF YOUR PROPERTY TAXES, WHICH I KNOW DEPENDING ON THE ADMINISTRATION EXISTS OR DOESN'T. THIS IS A PART OF YOUR OVERALL PROPERTY TAX. AND SO TO THE EXTENT YOU CAN, ABSOLUTELY. >> SO I JUST HAVE ONE LAST QUESTION. IS THIS A PROGRAM YOU JUST NOW THOUGHT? I KNOW WE HAVE BEEN TALKING CANOPY FOR A WHILE, AND IT JUST COMES UP NOW.
WAS THIS ALREADY IN THE WORKS LIKE IN YOUR PLAN, YOU KNOW ALONG THE WAY OR HOW DID THIS COME TO FRUITION? >> THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. TO BE CANDID, NO, THIS WAS NEVER IN THE WORKS. WE NEVER CONSIDERED IT. SOME OF OUR, YOU KNOW, AS RALPH F MENTIONED, WE DEVELOPED IN THE BAY AREA. I CONCENTRATE OBVIOUSLY ON SONOMA, NAPA, MARINE COUNTIES. AS RALPH
MENTIONED, THERE IS NOT A LOT OF THAT MAJOR HOME BUILDING DEVELOPMENT
THAT YOU SEE IN THE CENTRAL VALLEY OR PARTS OF SACRAMENTO OR PARTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, SO WE WERE UNAWARE OF IT. IN OUR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
OFFICE, THEY HAVE A FEW DEVELOPMENTS DOWN THERE THAT ARE DEVELOPING IN AREAS WHERE THIS KIND OF PROGRAM EXISTS AND ALL THE DEVELOPERS USE IT.
THEY WERE TELLING US ABOUT IT. IT SORT OF REMINDED ME ABOUT CONVERSATIONS
I HAD WITH STEVE AND TORY AND THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ABOUT HOW WE'RE ONLY PAYING 20% OF THE BUILDING PERMIT BECAUSE WE'RE DEFERRING SO MANY OF THESE FEES. I LEARNED THERE WAS AN OPPORTUNITY HERE TO, AGAIN, PAY RIGHT OF IT ALL OFF. WE LEARNED ABOUT IT OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS, AND WE HAD A
LOT OF GREAT CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF, MARY, ALEX, JANE, JOHN, AND WE STARTED TALKING TO THE CITY ABOUT HOW THIS COULD WORK HERE. AND SO NO,
THIS WAS A RECENT -- WE STARTED THINKING ABOUT IT, THEN WE STARTED
THINKING ABOUT WAYS WE COULD, YOU KNOW, IN THE CURRENT REAL ESTATE MARKET
PROVIDE INCENTIVES AND LOWER THE PRICES FOR THE ABSORPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT. SO THIS CAME ABOUT IN THE LAST THREE TO FOUR MONTHS. >> SO I HAVE ONE LAST QUESTION. SO DID I READ IT CORRECTLY? MAYBE I MISSED IT WHERE IT SAID YOU COULDN'T START SELLING HOMES UNTIL WE FIGURE THIS OUT? SO YOU HAVEN'T SOLD ANY HOMES YET?
WE'RE MARKETING THE HOMES, BUT WE CAN'T GO INTO CONTRACT UNTIL --CORRECT
ME IF I'M WRONG, RALPH, BUT I BELIEVE WE CAN'T GO INTO CONTRACT UNTIL YOU JOIN THE PROGRAM. IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT THE PROGRAM, THEN WE WOULD GO INTO CONTRACT.
RIGHT. BUT THE POINT IS WHETHER OR NOT YOU SOLD SOME OR NOT AND NOW YOU'RE DOING THIS? >> NO, NO, NO. WE HAVE ACTUALLY DELAYED FOR THAT VERY REASON. IF YOU CAN ASK MARY, WE GOT BEFORE THE COUNCIL AS QUICKLY AS WE WOULD. WE WANTED TOO HAVE THIS IN JANUARY BECAUSE WE DO WANT TO START. WE HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE INTERESTED, KNOCK ON WOOD. BUT YEAH, WE WOULD NEED TO KNOW ONE WAY OR ANOTHER BEFORE WE START SELLING.
I SEE, OKAY. THAT'S ALL MY QUESTIONS. IF NO ONE ELSE HAS QUESTIONS, WE CAN GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
THANK YOU, MAYOR, SO THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE BOLD PROGRAM FOR THE CANOPY PROJECT. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC HEARING, A PUBLIC COMMENT, AGAIN, IT'S TWO MINUTES, TIME LIMIT. DOW CHAMBERS FIRST AND THEN GO OUT TO ZOOM. SO IF THERE IS ANYONE IN THE CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO
MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE BOLD PROGRAM FOR THE CANOPY PROJECT, PLEASE COME UP TO THE PODIUM.
I'M GLAD TO BE HERE FOR THE PRESENTATION. LAWRENCE JAFFEY, LOCAL RESIDENT, LOCAL RENTAL PROVIDER. THERE ARE THREE PLACES WHERE I THINK
THIS PROGRAM, AND I REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR QUESTIONS, IMPACT THE POTENTIAL BUYER OF THIS PROPERTY. THE FIRST, OUR DEVELOPERS ARE ASSUMING EVERYONE IS GOING TO GET A MORTGAGE. SO NOT EVERYONE OF THE 80 PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BUY WITH A MORTGAGE. PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SELL THEIR HOUSES AND BUY HERE FOR CASH. THOSE PEOPLE WILL NOW BE LOCKED IN TO PAY $2 FOR EVERY $1 OF ASSESSMENT IMPACT FEE BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY 30 YEARS. SO FOR EVERY DOLLAR THEY BORROW, THEY'RE GOING TO PAY $2 BACK.
THERE IS ONLY APPARENTLY A FEE FROM PIPER TO DO THIS. I DON'T KNOW HOW
MUCH THE FEE IS, BUT WE KNOW THAT'S ADDED ON TO WHAT THESE FOLKS ARE GOING TO PAY ON THEIR TAXES. WHEN WILL IT AFFECT THE NEXT PEOPLE WHEN THEY GO TO SELL THEIR HOUSE? BECAUSE PEOPLE BUY THE HOUSE BY WHAT THEY CAN AFFORD TO PAY. NOW THEIR TAXES ARE HIGHER. SO YOU LOOK AT THE TAXES AND WHATEVER THE INTEREST RATES ARE AT THE DATE OF PURCHASE. THEY'RE
GOING TO HAVE TO BRING THE PRICE HOUSE WITHIN REACH OF WHAT PEOPLE CAN PAY. NOW THEY HAVE THIS HIGHER TAX ASSESSMENT. FOLKS WOULD BE INCENTIVIZED TO PAY THIS OFF. ALSO, THERE ARE ONLY VERY LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE THIS IS DEDUCTIBLE. REMEMBER, WE HAVE OUR SALT LIMITATIONS. THIS IS NOT NECESSARILY DEDUCTIBLE FOR OUR HOMEOWNERS. YOU HAVE TO BE PRETTY LOW INCOME TO GET THIS DEDUCTION. I UNDERSTAND THE CITY
MAY WISH TO RECEIVE AND FIND GREAT BENEFIT OF RECEIVING THE FULL IMPACT FEE, AND THAT'S WHY YOU'RE GIVING A DEEP CONSIDERATION. ALSO, I THINK
THIS IS A GREAT BENEFIT FOR OUR DEVELOPER, WHO IS SHIFTING THE RISK OF THESE DOLLARS ONTO FUTURE HOMEOWNERS. AS WE'VE ABSORBED THE LAST 18 MONTHS, HOUSING PRICES HAVE DROPPED. ACTUAL COUNTY IS DROPPING. >> LAWRENCE, YOU HAVE ABOUT 15 SECONDS.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR DEEP CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUE.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL GO OUT TO ZOOM. JUNE, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? >> YES, HI, GOOD EVENING. YEAH, THIS IS JUNE. AND YEAH, I HAVE SOME OF THE SAME CONCERNS THAT LAWRENCE AND PHILL HAVE RAISED JUST ABOUT THE HOUSING BURDEN ON ONGOING COSTS, YOU KNOW.
OTHER PLACES MAY HAVE OPTED IN. FOLKS LIKE A LOWER COST NOW, BUT THEN THERE'S A BURDEN OVER TIME. IT IS GOING TO SHOW UP ON THE PROPERTY TAX.
YOU KNOW, PEOPLE START SEEING THEIR PROPERTY TAXES GOING UP, AND THEN THEY HAVE A LESS APPETITE FOR OUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. IT WOULD BE GREAT IF FOLKS, WHEN THEY WERE BUYING THE HOUSE, COULD OPT IN OR OPT OUT. SO IF THEY HAD THAT $40,000 AND THEY JUST WANTED TO PAY IT. BUT WITH THIS, IF A
WEEK AFTER THEY BUY THE HOUSE THEY SAY THEY WANT TO PAY OFF THE BOND, THEY NEED TO PAY THE WHOLE AMOUNT, WHICH IS DOUBLE THE COST. I WISH WE
COULD GET IN WRITING F IT GOES FORWARD, THAT IT WON'T BE AN INTEREST RATE ABOVE 4%. WE'RE HEARING 3% TO 4%, THEN WE HEAR 3.25. COULD IT BE 6%? WHAT GUARANTEE DO WE HAVE ON WHAT THE INTEREST WILL BE ON THE BOND? I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT IN WRITING BEFORE GOING FORWARD. IT WOULD ALSO BE NICE
TO SEE SOME GUARANTEE THAT THE HOMEOWNERS WILL, SURE, IT WOULD BE DISCLOSED TO THEM, BUT HOW PROMINENT BE? YOU'LL GET IT THIS AMOUNT OVER
THE YEAR WHEN YOU RESELL YOUR HOUSE IF YOU TRY TO PAY IT OFF, YOU'LL PAY X AMOUNT TO PAY OFF THIS BOND. BECAUSE THE MIN YOU BUY, YOU'RE LOCKED IN FOR THAT GREATER AMOUNT. SO IT DOES PUT THE BURDEN ON THE COUNTY TO COLLECT THE PROPERTY TAX. WE HAVE A LOT OF SHARED GOALS WITH THE COUNTY, AND HOW WE FUND OUR PUBLIC SERVICES. SO I DO THINK IT'S THE CASE OF THOSE FINANCIERS, COLLECTING THEIR LOAN MONEY OVER ALL THE YEARS. YOU KNOW, ECONOMY HAS CHANGED AND THE BURDENS ARE OUT TO THE FUTURE. >> JANE, THAT'S TWO MINUTES.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS. IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT ON THIS PUBLIC HEARING? SEEING NONE, I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. KATE, CAN YOU UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE? >> THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. CAN YOU SEE THE TIMER STILL?
I CAN.
GREAT, GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT NUMBER ONE, IF THE CONSUMERS CAN DECIDE ON THEIR OWN IF THEY WANT TO TAKE ON IT HAD COST OR NOT. CLEARLY THE DEVELOPERS
ARE PROBABLY MUCH MORE EXPERIENCED WITH PRICING HOMES AND DEVELOPING THEM AND SELLING THEM THAN MOST OF US PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE. IF THEY FEEL
LIKE CONSUMERS WANT TO TAKE ON THIS EXTRA EXPENSE, WHICH WOULD ALWAYS BE DISCLOSED TO THEM BECAUSE THAT'S HOW MORTGAGES AND PRICING WORK. THEN I THINK THAT IT SEEMS LIKE WE WOULD LIVE IN A MARKETED ECONOMY FOR NOW. THE MARKET WORKS IN A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS. THIS SEEMS TO BE A STRATEGY THAT'S WORKING. THE OTHER POINT I WANT TO SAY IS THAT INFLATION IS ALSO A CONSTANT IN OUR ECONOMY. SO IF WE DELAY GETTING THE MONEY TO THE CITY FOR
THE IMPACT FEES, THE PRICES TO DO THE WORK THAT THE MONEY OF THE IMPACT FEES IS SUPPOSE TO COMPLETE WILL ALSO GO UP. ALL THE IMPACT FEES THEMSELVES WILL REMAIN THE SAME. SO YOU ARE BASICALLY, IF YOU COLLECT THE
SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY FIVE YEARS FROM NOW, IT WON'T BUY AS MUCH IN MARKET FIVE YEARS FROM NOW. AND LIKE MORTGAGES THAT ARE 30 YEARS OLD, THIS BOND AMOUNT WILL SEEM MUCH SMALLER IN 10, 15, 20 YEARS BECAUSE AS INFLATION
INCREASES OVER TIME, PRICES THAT ARE LOCKED IN A DIFFERENT MOMENT SEEM
MUCH CHEAPER, WHICH IS WHY PEOPLE WHO BOUGHT THEIR HOUSES, ONLY PAY $600,000 A YEAR ON PROPERTY TAXES HAVE EXTREMELY LOW PROPERTY TAXES. SO
GIVEN THE FACT WE HAVE INFLATION ON ONE SIDE AND A MARKET ON THE OTHER, I THINK THIS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN A GOOD LIGHT BY THE COUNCIL. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, KATE FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT. NEXT, I'LL COME BACK INTO CHAMBERS. IF THERE IS ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE BOLD PROGRAM? SEEING N I'LL GO BACK OUT TO ZOOM. IF THERE
IS ANYONE ON ZOOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THIS BOLD PROGRAM. PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND VIRTUALLY. SEEING NONE, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.
ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. GO AHEAD, VICE MAYOR?
SO I HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. WILL THE PROGRAM, WILL THE BOLD PROGRAM BE OPTIONAL FOR HOME BUYERS OR IS IT REQUIRED?
IT WOULD NOT BE OPTIONAL. FOR THE 68 --THE MARKET BASED HOMES, THE INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOMES DO NOT PARTICIPATE. BUT FOR THE 68 MARKET
RATE HOMES, IF WE WERE GRANTED THE ABILITY TO APPLY TO THE BOLD PROGRAM, IT WOULD APPLY TO ALL 68 HOMES.
OKAY. WILL THERE BE CLEAR DISCLOSURES?
ABSOLUTELY. >> CAN THE INTEREST RATE BE SECURE? HOW CAN WE BE SURE THAT INTEREST RATE IS STABLE?
NOW, I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY BECAUSE I KNOW A PUBLIC COMMENTER BROUGHT THAT UP. ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THE INTEREST RATE ON THE BOND OR THE INTEREST RATE FOR THE HOMEOWNER?
THE RATE THE HOMEOWNER WILL BE PAYING?
SO THE BOND, AND RALPH CAN EXPLAIN MORE ABOUT THIS. BUT THE BOND INTEREST RATE, I BELIEVE IS STABLE OVER 30 YEARS. I'M NOT SURE. RALPH? IT IS. SO THE BOND RATE IS SET AT THE TIME OF PRICING, AND IT'S FIXED AT THAT POINT. IT'S NOT FIXED UNTIL BONDS ARE SOLD, BUT THEY'RE IN THE CURRENT MARKET, WHERE YOU ARE LOOKING AT LOW 5s.
AND THEN THE MORTGAGE RATE, LIKE IF WE WERE, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, I THOUGHT ONE OF THE PUBLIC COMMENTERS BROUGHT UP A GOOD POINT. IN NO WAY WOULD A
DEVELOPER BE PROPOSING THIS PROGRAM THAT WOULD JUST RAISE THE PRICES ON
POTENTIAL HOMEOWNERS EVEN MORE THAN THE EXISTING HOME PRICE WITHOUT MAKING ANY CHANGES, ESPECIALLY IN THIS MARKET. MEANING THE INCENTIVES TO
BUY DOWN MORTGAGES, THE ACTUAL REALITY OF LOWERING HOME PRICES ARE A PART
OF THE WHOLE PROGRAM BECAUSE NO HOME BUYER WOULD, I THINK YOU UNDERSTAND
MY POINT ON THAT. SO IN TERMS OF YOUR QUESTION ABOUT THE MORTGAGE RATE,
THAT WOULD --
THE INTEREST RATE ON THE BOLD FEE.
THE INTEREST RATE ON THE BOLD FEE?
THE IMPACT FEE. THAT'S THE ADDITIONAL TAX ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILL. IS THAT GOING TO BE STABLE?
YES. THE BOLD, YES, THE BOND, YES, AS RALPH JUST DESCRIBED, THAT WOULD BE SOLID.
GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER HINTON? >> SO JUST HAVING LISTENED TO THIS. I KNOW IT'S REALLY DIFFICULT TO SELL HOMES RIGHT NOW AND BUILD THEM. I HAVE A GOOD FRIEND, MY BEST FRIEND ACTUALLY WHO WORKS. AND THINGS ARE SLOWING DOWN. SO IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU GUYS ARE PROPOSING THIS TO US BECAUSE YOU THINK THIS IS GOING TO HELP YOU SELL THESE HOMES?
YES. >> AND THERE IS NO DOWNSIDE TO THE CITY. AND I'M NOT AN EXPERT IN
THIS AREA, BUT I DO BELIEVE PEOPLE BUYING HOMES HAVE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY'RE COMMITTING TO. I FEEL LIKE OUR STAFF IS COMFORTABLE, THEN I WOULD
SUPPORT --I DON'T THINK YOU'RE GOING TO PUTT ANYTHING IN TO HELP YOU NOT SELL HOMES.
EXACTLY, YES. >> ANY WAY, I JUST WANT TODAY ADD THAT COMMENT. >> THANK YOU.
SO ACTUALLY BECAUSE OF SOME PUBLIC COMMENTS. SO IF SOMEONE COMES IN AND
PAYS CASH, THEN THEY'RE JUST GOING TO --THEY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO JUST PAY THIS OFF. BUT I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY -- >> IN THAT CASE, THEY PROBABLY WOULD PAY CASH FOR A LOWER PRICED HOME. WE CAN'T OFFER A MORTGAGE INCENTIVE. THE HOME PRICE WOULD BE LOWER.
OKAY. GO AHEAD.
I THINK YOU HAVE AN EXCELLENT PRODUCT. I'M EXCITED ABOUT THEM. I THINK THEY'RE GORGEOUS, AND I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO SELL. BUT I DON'T THINK THAT'S A REASON FOR YOU TO NEED THIS TOOL. AND I THINK IT IS COME COME FOR A LOT OF PEOPLE INVOLVED. AGAIN, I SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT A LOT.
BECAUSE LIKE THERE IS NO GUARANTEE ON LIKE HOW MUCH YOU'LL REDUCE IT
BECAUSE THIS IS A FLUCTUATING THING THAT HAPPENS MONTHLY, YOU KNOW, LIKE THINGS CHANGE. SO YEAH. I REALLY WANT YOU GUYS TO DO GREAT, BUT I DON'T THINK THIS IS THE RIGHT WAY TO HELP HERE.
THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE? ANY COMMENTS? OKAY. SO DO WE HAVE A MOTION OR OTHER THOUGHTS? >> I'LL GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE MOTION, I GUESS. I WOULD MOVE
THAT --WOULD IT BE WE WOULD --I WOULD MOVE THAT WE SUPPORT THE RESOLUTION
JOINING THE CMFA AND A RESOLUTION APPROVING AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE BOLD PROGRAM FOR THE CANOPY HOUSING PROJECT. ALL COSTS TO THE CITY CAN BE REIMBURSED THROUGH THE BOLD PROGRAM. IS THAT WHAT I NEED TO SAY? I'LL SECOND THAT. ALL RIGHT, MARY?
THANK YOU, SO MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER HINTON AND SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR
MAURER TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE RESOLUTION JOINING THE CMFA AND APPROVE
AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE BOLD SOLELY FOR THE CITY VENTURES, THE CANOPY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. COUNCILMEMBER CARTER? >> NO.
COUNCILMEMBER HINTON?
YES. >> COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN?
YES.
VICE MAYOR MAURER? >> YES.
MAYOR MCLEWIS?
YES. >> MOTION PASSES 4-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBERS HINTON, ZOLLMAN, VICE MAYOR
MAURER, AND MAYOR MCLEWIS IN SUPPORT, AND COUNCILMEMBER CARTER IN OPPOSITION.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT, SO WE WILL MOVE ON TO, LET'S SEE, ITEM NUMBER 7. THAT IS THE SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE, PUBLIC
HEARING TO CONSIDER FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8.80 OF THE CITY'S SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNITY SAFETY ORDINANCE. AND I DON'T KNOW.
I'LL BE PRESENTING THAT, MAYOR. GETTING SCREEN SHARING PRIVILEGES. >> MAYBE WE'LL GIVE THEM A MINUTE. THANK YOU. HOW ABOUT WE --CAN WE TAKE A BIO BREAK FOR FIVE MINUTES? [ MEETING WILL RESUME AFTER A FIVE-MINUTE BREAK ] >>> ALL RIGHT, WE'RE BACK. ALL RIGHT. SO WE ARE GOING TO PICK UP WITH NUMBER SEVEN, SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE. I THINK OUR CITY ATTORNEY IS GOING TO KICK THAT OFF.
GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, ONCE AGAIN, AND COUNCILMEMBERS. TONIGHT, BEFORE YOU AS A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8.80, THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE, THE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNITY ORDINANCE. SO THE COUNCIL FIRST APPROVED THIS ORDINANCE BACK IN 2022. IF YOU LOOK AT THE FINDINGS AND THE
PURPOSE THAT'S STATED THERE, THERE'S A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT BIOMETRIC CAMERAS AND SORT OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES. BUT IT'S MUCH BROADER THAN THAT AND THE ACTUAL DEFINITIONS. SO IT DEFINES SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, ANY SOFTWARE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR SIMILAR. PRIMARILY INTENDED TO COLLECT, PERTAIN, SHARE AUDIO, ELECTRONIC, VISUAL, BIOMETRIC. ALL THE
FACTORY, SIMILAR INFORMATION, SPECIFICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH ANY INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP. SO VERY BROAD TALKING ABOUT SOME SORT OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, BUT ALSO VERY SIMPLE TECHNOLOGIES LIKE VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDING. THE DEFINITION PROVIDES EXAMPLES. THIS IS A NON-EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF LICENSE
PLATE READERS, TOLL READERS, GUNSHOT DETECTION, HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MOBILE DNA CAPTURE. CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CAMERA IS ONE OF THE ITEMS ON THE LIST. THE OTHER EXAMPLES, YOU KNOW, X-RAY VANS, SOFTWARE DESIGN AND MONITOR SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES. RADIO FREQUENCY I.D. SCANNERS. SO
AGAIN, YOU'RE SEEING THE DEFINITION IS, YOU KNOW, HAS A LOT OF EXAMPLES
OF VERY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, BUT ALSO THE CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CAMERAS. SO CURRENTLY WHAT THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES IS THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE BIOORDINANCE AS SURVEILLANCE USE POLICY EACH TIME BEFORE THE CITY CAN SEEK FUNDS OR ACCEPT DONATIONS FOR SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. ACQUIRE OR BORROW NEW SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. USE NEW SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY.
USE EXISTING SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY FOR A PURPOSE IN A MANNER OR IN A LOCATION, NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OR BEFORE THE
CITY, AN AGREEMENT INCLUDING ORAL AGREEMENT WITH A NON-CITY ENTITY TO ACQUIRE SHARE OR OTHERWISE USE TECHNOLOGY. THAT'S ANY OF THE TYPES OF SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY THAT WILL FALL UNDER THAT DEFINITION. SO THE BROAD NATURE OF THE ORDINANCE HAS CREATED SOME IMPACTS RECENTLY. ONE OF
THEM BEING THE CITY CAN'T UPGRADE SOME OF THEIR OLDER TECHNOLOGY WITHOUT
GOING THROUGH THAT SPECIFIED PROCESS IN THE ORDINANCE, WHICH INVOLVES A REPORT ON CONSENT AND THEN, YOU KNOW, 45 DAYS LATER, A PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE ORDINANCE. BUT BEFORE IT UPGRADES THE TECHNOLOGY. SO THIS HAS
COME UP WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, WHERE THEY HAVE SECURITY CAMERAS AT
SOME FACILITIES AROUND THE CITY, EXISTING LONG, BUT THEY DON'T RECORD, THEY ONLY CAPTURE LIVE FEED. SO TO MAKE THEM RECORD, THAT'S A NEW TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY. AND SO IT IS REQUIRED TO GO THROUGH THAT SAME PROCESS. THE
SAME THING WOULD BE TRUE FOR OTHER TYPES OF TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES, YOU KNOW, TO BRING THINGS UP TO MODERN STANDARDS. I THINK I USED THE EXAMPLE OF GOING FROM BLACK TO WHITE IN THAT REPORT. THE DEPARTMENT CANNOT USE PRIVATELY OWNED SECURITY CAMERA. IF THERE IS A CRIME, WE HAVEN'T APPROVED
USING THE PARTICULAR BUSINESSES SECURITY CAMERAS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSE. SO THEY CAN'T USE THOSE CAMERAS UNLESS WE GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS AND IDENTIFY ALL THE LOCATIONS WHERE IT IS LOUD AND THAT PROCESS.
AND STAFF DOESN'T BELIEVE THAT WAS THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE. JUST
BASED ON ALL THE LANGUAGE AND THE ORDINANCE ABOUT SORT OF FOCUSING ON
THESE MORE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY THAT THAT IS REALLY THE INTENT, YOU KNOW,
A COUNCILMEMBER BROUGHT UP A FEW MEETINGS AGO THIS IS A POTENTIAL FUTURE
AGENDA ITEM, AND WE LET THEM KNOW THIS IS SOMETHING WE WERE WORKING ON TO
BRING TO THE COUNCIL, SO YOU COULD BE BEFORE YOU FOR DISCUSSION AND THE COUNCIL TO DECIDE. SO WHAT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD DO IS THAT
COUNCIL APPROVAL WOULDN'T BE REQUIRED FOR THE USE OF SECURITY CAMERAS
WHETHER PUBLICLY PRIVATELY OWNED AS LONG AS THE SECURITY CAMERA ONLY
CAPTURES VIDEO AND SOUND, AND DOESN'T HAVE ANY OF THESE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES. DOESN'T COLLECT THERMAL, ANY OTHER TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY OR RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY. ALL WOULD STILL REQUIRE APPROVAL. BUT THIS KIND
OF TECHNOLOGY, CAMERAS, TRADITIONAL CAMERAS, WOULD NOT UNLESS IT'S IN A NEW LOCATION, A CITY-OWNED LOCATION. SO IF WE WERE TO INSTALL NEW
CAMERAS AT SOME CITY PROPERTY, WHERE THEY DON'T CURRENTLY EXIST, THAT WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL FROM THE CITY COUNCIL. BUT USING A PRIVATELY OWNED
CAMERA WOULD NOT OR UPGRADING A CITY CAMERA, AS LONG AS THEY STILL ONLY CAPTURE VIDEO AND SOUND WOULD NOT. I'LL NOTE THIS IS REALLY ABOUT ALLOWING RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC INCIDENTS. SO CAMERAS COULD BE USED TO VIEW
SPECIFIC INCIDENTS, YOU KNOW, LIKE CRIMES OF, YOU KNOW, I WOULD SAY ROBBERY OR GRAFFITI AT CITY HALL. YOU WANT TO SEE WHO DOES THAT. IT'S NOT ABOUT DATA COLLECTION OR MONITORING. WHILE IT DOES NOT SAY THAT EXPLICITLY IN THE ORDINANCE. BUT BECAUSE THESE CAMERAS ARE, YOU KNOW,
THIS BASIC TECHNOLOGY, THERE IS NO --SOMEONE WOULD HAVE TO LITERALLY MONITOR IT. SO IF YOU WANT TO SEE EVERY PERSON THAT WALKS DOWN THE STREET, SOMEONE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT ALL THAT FOOTAGE TO RECORD THAT.
WE'RE NOT USING ANY SORT OF HIGH-TECH. SOME OF THESE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD DO THAT AUTOMATICALLY. NONE OF THAT IS SORT OF AUTOMATIC WORK WOULD BE DONE. SO IT WOULD REQUIRE, YOU KNOW, DEDICATING A
HUGE AMOUNT OF STAFF RESOURCES TO DO THAT KIND OF SURVEILLANCE, AND SO
AGAIN, THAT IS WHY THE PURPOSE IS REALLY ABOUT GIVING THE CITY TOOLS TO DEAL WITH SPECIFIC INCIDENTS OR PURPOSES. SO TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS
IS THE DEFINITION THAT WOULD BE ADDED IF THE COUNCIL DECIDED THIS WAS THE
ORDINANCE THEY WANTED TO APPROVE, MEANS ANY CAMERA THAT IS SOLELY CAPABLE OF CAPTURING VIDEO. CAPTURING AND RECORDING VIDEO AND/OR AUDIO, YOU KNOW, TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS DO NOT INCLUDE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING.
SIMILAR INFORMATION, INVOLVING THE USE OF ANY PREDICTED TECHNOLOGY, SCANNING TECHNOLOGY, ARTIFICIAL TECHNOLOGY, OR RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES.
SO THINGS LIKE AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READERS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT
WOULD NOT BE COVERED WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS. SO THIS IS THE RELEVANT SECTION IN THE CODE. SAYING WHERE THE
CITY COUNCIL HAS TO OBTAIN WHERE APPROVAL IS NECESSARY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL. SO SEEKING FUNDS RIGHT NOW, COUNCILMEMBER APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
FOR SEEKING FUNDS FOR SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, YOU KNOW, APPLYING FOR GRANTS OR THOSE THINGS. ADDING THE WORD, EXCEPT FOR TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERA. AND THIS IS ONLY ABOUT FUNDING.
ACQUIRING OR BORROWING A NEW SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INCLUDING NOT LIMITING THE TECHNOLOGY WITHOUT THE EXCHANGE MONEYS OR CONSIDERATION. AND
I'LL JUST NOTE, YOU KNOW, THIS WOULD STILL HAVE TO BE A BUDGETED EXPENDITURE TO THE CITY'S PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND BUDGET POLICIES. OR
USING A NEWER OR EXISTING SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY FOR A PURPOSE IN THE MANNER AND THE LOCATION NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL. THIS
DOES NOT APPLY TO TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS, EXCEPT FOR THE USE OF TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS OWNED BY THE CITY IN A NEW LOCATION. SO
AGAIN, IF THE CITY IS INSTALLING SECURITY CAMERAS SOME PLACE NEW, WE WOULD STILL REQUIRE COUNCIL APPROVAL. BUT THIS FACILITATES THE USE OF PRIVATE SECURITY CAMERAS. AND THE AGREEMENT FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL BEFORE
ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT TO USE CAMERAS WITH A THIRD PARTY, ADDING THE LANGUAGE. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE USING TRADITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS FOR A
SPECIFIC INCIDENT OR EVENT, AS LONG AS SUCH USE IS NOT PART OF AN ONGOING ARRANGEMENT WITH A NON-CITY ENTITY. AND AGAIN, THIS LANGUAGE WOULD INTEND
TO REFLECT ON WHAT I MENTIONED EARLIER, THIS IS ABOUT USING PRIVATE CAMERAS FOR SPECIFIC EVENTS. IT'S NOT ABOUT ACCESSING SOMEONE, A PRIVATE
SECURITY CAMERA, YOU KNOW, AS PART OF A SURVEILLANCE NETWORK ON A PERMANENT BASIS. THAT WOULD, ANY TYPE OF ONGOING ARRANGEMENT WOULD STILL REQUIRE COUNCIL APPROVAL. THIS IS ABOUT RESPONDING TO SPECIFIC EVENTS
USING, YOU KNOW, SOMEONE AGREEING TO GIVE THAT VIEW OF THEIR PRIVATE
SECURITY FOOTAGE BECAUSE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WOULD WANT TO LOOK AT SOMETHING FOR A CRIME, NOT A PERMANENT THING. SO IF THE COUNCIL WANTS TO
MOVE FORWARD WITH THESE AMENDMENTS, THE RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO
INTRODUCE AND WAIVE THE FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER
8.80, THE SEBASTOPOL MUNICIPAL CODE. SO WITH THAT, I WILL PAUSE FOR QUESTIONS.
OKAY. I KNOW VICE MAYOR HAD HER HAND UP FIRST. >> TWO QUESTIONS. ONE, ISN'T IT TRUE THAT THE POLICE NEED A WARRANT TO ACCESS A PRIVATE CAMERA? THIS DOESN'T GIVE BLANKET ACCESS TO ALL PRIVATE CAMERAS, IS THAT CORRECT?
SO THIS DOES NOT CHANGE ANY OBLIGATIONS OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. SO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT NEED A WARRANT TO UNILATERALLY ACCESS A PRIVATE CAMERA. SOMEONE CAN VOLUNTARILY COME BRING
THEIR, YOU KNOW, AND ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN, BUT THIS DOES NOT CHANGE ANY WARRANT REQUIREMENTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. >> OKAY. AND THEN WE
RECEIVED A COUPLE E-MAILS ON THIS, AND I'M JUST GOING TO READ A COUPLE
SENTENCES FROM THIS ONE E-MAIL, AND I'D LIKE YOUR FEEDBACK ON WHAT THEY'RE SAYING. INSTEAD OF MODIFYING THE ORDINANCE TO CREATE A WAY FOR
UNACCOUNTABLE NON-TRANSPARENT, WARRANTLESS CITY WIDE DRAGNET SURVEILLANCE TOOLS IN YOUR CITY, YOU SHOULD INSTEAD MODIFY SECTION 8.80.040 TEMPORARY ACQUISITION DURING CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ORDINANCE. AND I WOULD LIKE YOUR FEEDBACK ON THIS. >> I SAW THAT COMMENT. I'M NOT --THERE ISN'T AN
EXCEPTION IN THERE FOR THE EXISTING ORDINANCE WHERE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
OR WHOEVER DOESN'T NEED TO --GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS OF THE COUNCIL
APPROVAL FOR CIRCUMSTANCES, WHICH ARE, LET ME PULL UP THE SORT OF --I'M GOING TO PARAPHRASE WHAT THAT MEANS. BUT IT'S FOR THE LIFE AND SAFETY MEDIA, LIFE AND SAFETY NEEDS. AND THE ISSUE WITH THAT HERE IS THAT, YOU KNOW, LET'S SAY A CRIME HAPPENED FIVE DAYS AGO. THERE'S NO LONGER ANY EMERGENCY CIRCUMSTANCES. THE CRIME IS IN THE PAST. YOU NO LONGER --
THERE'S NO LONGER THE IMMEDIATE RISK TO HEALTH OR SAFETY OR THOSE SORTS
OF THINGS, SO IT DOESN'T QUITE MAKE SENSE WE WOULD JUST RELY ON THAT EXEMPTION BECAUSE IT'S NOT GOING TO APPLY IN A LOT OF THESE SITUATIONS.
YOU KNOW, IF THERE WAS A LIVE PURSUIT OF, YOU KNOW, GOD FORBID A SHOOTING AND THE POLICE WERE CHASING SOMEONE AND WANT TO ACCESS THAT. THAT MIGHT BE A SITUATION WHERE THAT WOULD APPLY. BUT IF THERE IS A CRIME IN THE
PAST THAT IS NO LONGER ONE OF THOSE IMMEDIATE THREATS TO --TO HEALTH AND SAFETY. I'M JUST PULLING UP THE EXACT LANGUAGE THERE.
SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IT WOULDN'T REALLY COVER THE NEEDS THAT ARE BEING EXPRESSED RIGHT NOW BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT?
CORRECT. AND JUST TO READ THIS, WHAT IT SAYS IS, YOU KNOW, OPT TO USE
THESE TECHNOLOGIES DURING CIRCUMSTANCES, WHICH FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS
CHAPTER IS DEFINED AS AN EMERGENCY INVOLVING IMMINENT DANGER OR DEATH OR
SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURY TO ANY PERSON THAT REQUIRES IMMEDIATE USE OF THE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. SO THAT IMMINENT DANGER IS REALLY ABOUT THINGS HAPPENING NOW, NOT IN A TYPICAL SITUATION.
OKAY. I'M GOING TO GO TO THE RIGHT HERE AND THEN I'LL COME BACK TO THE LEFT. GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER HINTON?
OKAY, CAN I ASK A SITUATION? A FEW YEARS AGO, MY CAR WAS BROKEN INTO RIGHT HERE ON MORRIS. I WAS AT A BIRTHDAY PARTY AT THE CROOKED GOAT, AND
SOMEBODY BUSTED OUT MY WINDOWS AND ALL THE OTHER WINDOWS, AND I HAD LEFT
MY WALLET IN MY GLOVE BOX AND LOST A LOT OF CASH AND ALL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION. BECAUSE OF THIS ORDINANCE, WE COULD NOT USE THE CAMERAS THAT
WERE SET UP ON THE AUTO BODY SHOPS ACROSS THE STREET FROM MORRIS TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT AND INVESTIGATE THAT CRIME, CORRECT?
CORRECT. IT WOULD REQUIRE UNDER WHAT THE ORDINANCE SAYS, IT WOULD REQUIRE COUNCIL APPROVAL TO USE ANY CAMERA, INCLUDING PRIVATELY OWNED ONES.
AND JUST TO REITERATE, WE DID HEAR ABOUT THIS ISSUE WITH AN E-MAIL FROM
DANIELLE AT RETRO GRADE WHO ALSO HAS A CAMERA BEHIND HER SHOP AND HAD A
BREAK IN, AND WE COULDN'T INVESTIGATE IT BECAUSE WE COULDN'T USE HER OWN CAMERA FOR HER OWN CRIME TO MAKE AN ARREST, CORRECT?
CORRECT.
THANK YOU.
--
GO AHEAD, COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN?
COUNCILMEMBER MAURER, THANK YOU FOR REFERRING TO THAT E-MAIL BECAUSE I
ACTUALLY WANT TO FOCUS YOUR ATTENTION ON THE REST OF THE CONTENTS OF THAT E-MAIL. SO TO COVER THE SITUATION WITH DANIELLE AND TO COVER THE SITUATION OF COUNCILMEMBER HINTON JUST IDENTIFIED, THE REST OF THIS EMAIL STATES THAT SHOULD WE DECIDE TO DO THIS TO ASSIST OUR LAW
ENFORCEMENT BY USING TAPES, TAPES FROM OUR EQUIPMENT, FROM PRIVATE
CITIZENS, WE COULD ACTUALLY GO THROUGH AND IMPOSE A REQUIREMENT AND THE REST OF THAT IS ACTUALLY IN THIS E-MAIL. THIS PREVISION, WHAT COULD
HAPPEN IS IMPLEMENTING A PROVISION FOR A SEVEN-DAY WINDOW FOR THE USE OF
THE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, MEANING THE FACT IF POLICE WANTED TO ACCESS
THAT TAPE, THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE SEVEN DAYS TO DO IT, BUT THEY ALSO
MUST LET US KNOW THE COUNCIL AND KEEP A PAPER TRAIL OF EACH TIME THEY'RE
TRYING TO ACCESS SOMETHING IN ORDER TO SERVE, AND TO RESOLVE THOSE TYPE OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES. SO IF WE WENT IN THAT DIRECTION AND WE HAVE GOTTEN
SEVERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS TO ENCOURAGE US TO NOT JUST RELINQUISH COUNCIL
CONTROL, HOW MUCH STAFF TIME WOULD THAT TAKE IN ORDER TO DO WHAT'S IN THE REMAINING PART OF THE E-MAIL THAT YOU STARTED TO READ?
I DON'T KNOW IF WE ARE PREPARED TO ANSWER THAT. I WOULD SAY THAT IS WHAT'S IN THE EXISTING ORDINANCE. IT'S A WORD I HAD TROUBLE SAYING, BUT CIRCUMSTANCES ARE IN THERE ALREADY IN SECTION 8.--
THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M GETTING AT. MY QUESTION IS TO RESOLVE DANIELLE'S SITUATION AND COUNCILMEMBER HINTON'S SITUATION. IF WE WANTED TO ALLOW
POLICE TO ACCESS THAT VIDEO TAPE, BUT WE ALSO WANTED THEM TO LET US KNOW
ONE MORE REQUEST FOR US TO EVENTUALLY REVIEW THEY REQUESTED THAT AND THEN ONLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE TAPES FOR SEVEN DAYS. HOW MUCH TIME WOULD THAT TAKE YOU TO RETURN BACK TO COUNCIL?
SO I GUESS I WOULD SAY, TO DRAFT IT?
YES.
A COUPLE HOURS. STAFF TIME TO IMPLEMENT THAT, I DON'T KNOW. IT SOUNDS
LIKE JUST TO MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR, WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS WHEN THE POLICE
WANTED TO USE IT, THEY WOULD MAKE THE REQUEST FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL WOULD APPROVE IT?
NO, THEY COULD GO AHEAD, SHOULD THIS BE THE WILL OF THE COUNCIL TO AUTHORIZE THAT, I'M JUST LOOKING FOR TRANSPARENCY. >> OH, SO IT WOULD BE
IT WOULD BE A NOTIFICATION THEY SOUGHT TO USE THAT PORTION OF THE TAPE, BUT ONLY FOR SEVEN DAYS. THEN IT WOULD BE ERASED, SO WE, AS
COUNCILMEMBERS, COULD KEEP A PAPER TRAIL OF HOW MUCH PRIVATE CITIZEN VIDEO IS BEING ACCESSED AND WHERE.
YEAH, I WOULD DEFER THAT TO MARY OR THE CHIEF. I THINK THAT PROBABLY
WOULD NOT, THE NOTIFICATION WOULD NOT, YOU KNOW, HAVE EXTENSIVE STAFF TIME. I WOULD SAY SEVEN DAYS. INVESTIGATIONS GO ON SOMETIMES LONGER THAN SEVEN DAYS. IF YOU'RE CRIMINALLY PROSECUTING SOMEONE THAT GOES ON MUCH LONGER. SO JUST OFF THE CUSP, THAT MIGHT BE WHERE THE ISSUE IS. THE
NULLIFICATION IS PROBABLY NOT AN EXTENSIVE STAFF TIME, BUT I SEE SOME POTENTIAL. >> TO CLARIFY WHAT E-MAIL WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE? IT'S BEEN
REFERENCED TWICE, AND THERE'S A LOT OF E-MAILS ON THIS SUBJECT, AND TRYING TO FIND THE ONE THAT IS BEING REFERENCED.
THIS ONE WAS SUBMITTED BY JIM DUFFY TODAY AT 11:30.
THANK YOU.
SO I HAVE MY OWN QUESTION, AND IT IS MY OWN EXPERIENCE. I BELIEVE IT WAS ABOUT FIVE YEARS AGO. I HAD MY GARAGE BROKEN INTO AND MY CAR ATTEMPTED BREAK-IN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT. BOTH TIMES I HAD VIDEO. I TOOK IT TO THE POLICE. THE CAR CAR ISSUE, THEY FOUND THAT PERSON BECAUSE I PROVIDED THEM THE VIDEO AND THEN THEY FOUND THAT PERSON THAT DAY. SO AT THAT TIME,
I MEAN, SO WHAT HAPPENS NOW, RIGHT NOW, IF SOMEONE BROKE INTO MY HOUSE AND I PROVIDED VIDEO? WHAT HAPPENS? CAN THAT BE UTILIZED? I'M HEARING
WITH SOME OF OUR BUSINESSES THEY'RE SAYING THEY'RE NOT, BUT I KNOW FIVE YEARS AGO, I HAD MY OWN EXPERIENCE AND BROUGHT THAT FORTH. >> SO THE CURRENT ORDINANCE WAS ADOPTED IN 2022, SO THIS MIGHT HAVE BEEN BEFORE THAT. >> I'M JUST TRYING TO COMPARE THAT TO NOW AND WHAT WE'RE DOING FOR THE FUTURE. BECAUSE IF I DIDN'T HAVE THESE VIDEOS, WE WOULDN'T HAVE FOUND $10,000 WORTH OF STUFF IN MY HOUSE THAT WAS STOLEN IN ADDITION TO MY CAR.
SO I'M JUST SAYING. I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THEN, WE COULD UTILIZE THE VIDEOS RIGHT NOW. THEY CANNOT BECAUSE OF WHAT WE HAVE. SO YOU'RE ASKING FOR THE FUTURE FOR A DECISION TONIGHT TO THEN ALLOW THAT AGAIN, RIGHT? CORRECT. I WOULD DEFER TO THE CHIEF ON HOW OFTEN THIS HAS BEEN THE ISSUE, BUT THERE HAVE BEEN TIMES WHERE THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO USE.
YES, PLEASE.
CAN I ASK WHAT YOUR SPECIFIC QUESTION IS, PLEASE? >> I'M JUST TRYING TO
UNDERSTAND, YOU KNOW, FIVE YEARS AGO, THE POLICE WERE ABLE TO USE MY VIDEOS IN ORDER TO CATCH THE PEOPLE WHO BROKE INTO MY STUFF. AND NOW, WE CAN'T DO THAT, CORRECT? BUT IF I BROUGHT A VIDEO TO YOU NOW, YOU'RE SAYING IT COULD NOT BE UTILIZED TO HELP FIND THE PERPETRATORS, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT. I MEAN, WE COULD CERTAINLY HAVE IT SHINED TO US, BUT WE
CAN'T USE IT FOR ANY FORM OF PROSECUTION OR USE IT IN THE CASE BECAUSE IT IS WRITTEN INTO THE ORDINANCE CURRENTLY. AND ALEX CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M
WRONG, BUT THE CITY IS LIABLE FOR COSTS IF SOMEONE WERE TO FILE A DEFENSE
AND FIND WE'VE USED FOOTAGE THAT WAS NOT AUTHORIZED AND THE CITY BECOMES LIABLE FOR THE COST OF THE DEFENSE. SO THE FRUIT OF THE POISON TREE IS WHAT WE'RE REFERRING TO.
AND I DON'T KNOW IF THE CITY WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COST, BUT IT MIGHT
BE AN ISSUE WHERE THIS, YOU KNOW, EVIDENCE WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE IT VIOLATED OUR ORDINANCE TO COLLECT.
I'M SURE IT SAYS IN THERE THAT THEY WOULD BE LIABLE FOR COST? >> THERE
IS A SEPARATE PROCESS IN HERE THAT WILL CHALLENGE OUR COLLECTION OF IT AND SEPARATE FROM ANY CRIMINAL PROSECUTION.
OKAY. SO THEN WHAT YOU'RE ASKING TONIGHT, AT LEAST FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND. FROM ONE PERSPECTIVE IS YOU WANT TO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THESE TYPES OF VIDEOS LIKE WE COULD IN THE PAST. IS THAT THE SPIRIT OF WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT? I JUST WANT TO CLEARLY UNDERSTAND HOW THIS APPLIES REAL WORLD.
I APPRECIATE THE PUBLIC COMMENT WE'VE HAD AND PEOPLE'S CONCERNS ABOUT CIVIL LIBERTIES. I WOULD ASSERT TO THEM I VALUE THE SAME CIVIL LIBERTIES
IN THIS COUNTRY, AND I HAVE ZERO INTENTION OF OUR AGENCY USING THEM IN ANY FASHION THAT'S NOT APPROPRIATE FOR PROSECUTION. WE'VE GOT CASES RIGHT
NOW THAT WE'VE GOT PEOPLE ON VIDEO THAT WE CANNOT USE TO FURTHER THAT
PROSECUTION AND HOLD THESE PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR CRIME, OCCURRING IN THE CITY. TO ME, IT SEEMS TO BE CONCERNING THAT YOU HAVE A POLICE
DEPARTMENT HERE THAT HAVING THEIR HANDS TIED FOR WHAT ALEX SAID, VERY BASIC TECHNOLOGY THAT SURROUNDS US. EVERYBODY HAS IT. I MEAN, WE HAVE MORE TRACKING CAPABILITIES ON THEIR CELL PHONES. I GATHER ALL OF YOU HAVE, AND WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT BASIC VIDEO CAMERAS. MY SOUL PURPOSE IS
TO BE ABLE TO USE THAT FOOTAGE TO PROSECUTE TO THE PEOPLE WHO COMMIT THE CRIME.
OKAY. COUNCILMEMBER ZOLLMAN?
THANK YOU, CHIEF. TO FOLLOW THAT UP THOUGH, I MEAN, IT IS JUST A MINOR
CONCERN, GIVEN WHERE WE ARE WITH OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND OUR BROWN BROTHERS AND SISTERS. IT IS A HUGE CONCERN. SO WHAT OPPOSITION WOULD YOU HAVE TO FILING SOMETHING ON A REGULAR BASIS? EVERY TIME YOU REQUESTED TO
USE CITY CAMERA FOOTAGE OR PRIVATE CITIZEN FOOTAGE, I'M ASSUMING YOU WOULD BE SOMEWHERE OUT IN THE PUBLIC. SO WHAT HARM WOULD IT BE FOR YOU TO
FILE SOMETHING WITH THE CITY SAYING YOU REQUESTED CAMERA FOOTAGE ON THIS DAY, FROM THIS PERIOD FOR THIS PURPOSE? AND FILE IT ON A MONTHLY BASIS TO LET US KNOW WHAT SURVEILLANCE IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING WITHIN OUR CITY? >>
I'LL ANSWER THAT QUESTION BY SAYING THERE IS A SUBJECTIVE POLICY HERE IN
THE CITY THAT REQUIRES WE NOTIFY YOU OF PRETTY MUCH ANYTHING THAT WILL GO ANY WAY. SO I WOULD THINK YOU WOULD BE NOTIFIED AT THE TIME BY ME OR AT
LEAST THE LIEUTENANT OF A SITUATION, WHERE WE ARE INVESTIGATING A CRIME,
AND WE HAVE OBTAINED SOME FOOTAGE, AND WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO INCLUDE THAT VERBAGE TO NOTIFY YOU AT THE TIME. BUT CIRCLING BACK TO YOUR PREVIOUS COMMENT ABOUT THE SEVEN-DAY RETENTION PERIOD. THAT WOULD BE DIFFICULT FOR
US TO MAINTAIN BECAUSE OF THE LENGTH OF TIME IT TAKES TO BRIDGE A
DISPOSITION IN SOME SORT OF PROSECUTION WITH THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND OUR LEGAL SYSTEM. SO THOSE FOOTAGE, SHOULD SOMEONE APPLY THEM
TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ATTACHED TO THE CASE FILE BECAUSE THEY WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE D.A.'S OFFICE AND USED IN PROSECUTION. DEPENDING ON THE
TYPE OF CRIME THAT IT RELATES, THERE ARE DIFFERENT RETENTION PERIODS, SO WE WOULD BE GUIDED BY THOSE STATE MANDATES. [ CAPTIONERS TRANSITIONING ]