Sebastopol City Council
March 17, 2026

hazenandsawyer.com

3.1 Evaluation of Financial Impact for Funding Alternatives The financial impact of the three Well #4 Replacement Project funding alternatives were evaluated to quantify the potential benefits associated with pursuing state or federally administered funding programs. This analysis focused on comparing total project costs3 (refer to Figure 1) and the estimated financial burden per residential account per month (refer to Figure 2) under each alternative.

Figure 1: Total Cost of Funding Alternatives
Figure 2: Estimated Debt Service Cost Per Month Per Equivalent Residential Account, FY26-FY30 3 The total costs include the sum of all cash outflows over the lift of the loan. For example, a $3 million construction project financed through a loan of 5% interest over a 30-year term would result in annual payments of approximately $193,000. Over 30 years, this amounts to roughly $5.8 million in total payments.

Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

hazenandsawyer.com
The analysis indicates that the DWSRF loan program offers the most significant financial benefit to the City. Due to its low-interest financing terms, the DWSRF alternative results in a present value savings of approximately $1.3 million over the life of the project compared to full revenue bond financing.

This cost advantage also translates into a lower monthly impact on ratepayers. The debt service burden, calculated as the annual debt service attributable to the Well #4 project divided by the number of equivalent residential water accounts and then divided by 12 months, shows an estimated reduction of approximately 25%, or roughly $1.05 per month per account when using DWSRF financing instead of revenue bonds.

Importantly, the analysis accounts for a potential 10% increase in construction costs associated with meeting federal cross-cutting requirements. Even with this additional cost, the favorable interest rate of the DWSRF loan still makes it the most financially advantageous alternative for the City.

3.2 Assessment of Funding Alternative Risks
Project financing methods can introduce new risks that may affect both the timeline and overall cost of implementation. These include schedule-related risks and the uncertainty of securing funding through competitive selection processes. In some cases, administrative requirements tied to specific funding programs, such as detailed application procedures, environmental reviews, or compliance documentation, may not align with the project’s current schedule. Similarly, delays in the release or timing of funding opportunities can disrupt planned activities.

If the project schedule must be adjusted to meet funding program timelines or requirements, this can result in extended implementation periods, increased costs due to inflation or contractor pricing, and potential delays in delivering critical infrastructure improvements. These risks should be carefully weighed when selecting a financing strategy to ensure that project delivery remains efficient and costeffective. A summary of the risks associated with each of the three funding alternatives are provided in Table 3 below.

Table 3: Risks Associated with Funding Alternatives
Alternative Definition Assumptions
1 City-issued Revenue
Bonds
 The City’s 2024 Water and Wastewater Rate Report indicates that securing new debt financing may be challenging given the current financial condition of the water enterprise fund. This presents a moderate level of risk to the feasibility of obtaining revenue bond financing. By approving the 5-year water rate plan outlined in the Rate Report, the City has worked to mitigate this risk.  This funding approach would not trigger federal cross-cutting requirements and is expected to pose minimal risk to the project schedule.

Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

hazenandsawyer.com
Alternative Definition Assumptions
2 DWSRF Loan  Given the project scope and estimated cost, the Well #4 Replacement Project is well-suited for DWSRF funding
opportunities. However, the requirement to apply through a competitive process introduces a moderate level of funding risk.  This funding method would trigger federal cross-cutting requirements; however, it presents only modest project schedule risk, as the DWSRF program is well-established with clearly defined application and implementation milestones.
3 Partial Grant Funding
and City-issued
Revenue Bonds
 The City’s 2024 Water and Wastewater Rate Report indicates that securing new debt financing may be challenging given the current financial condition of the water enterprise fund. This presents a moderate level of risk to the feasibility of obtaining revenue bond financing. By approving the 5-year water rate plan outlined in the Rate Report, the City has worked to mitigate this risk.  Grant opportunities are not currently open for application and would be awarded through a competitive process, resulting in a high level of uncertainty and risk in securing this funding source.  This funding method would trigger federal cross-cutting requirements and is associated with a moderate level of project schedule risk.

3.3 Funding Alternatives Evaluation Summary
Based on the funding options identified and evaluated, pursuing a low-interest loan through the DWSRF emerges as the most advantageous option for financing the Well #4 Replacement Project.

The DWSRF program offers the greatest financial benefit to the City while presenting relatively low risk compared to other alternatives.

Hazen recommends that the City move forward with a DWSRF funding application for the Well #4 Replacement Project. In parallel, the City should continue to monitor potential opportunities to supplement this funding with grants, such as those offered by the USBR, should NOFOs be released.

This dual-track strategy would enhance financial flexibility and potentially reduce the City's longterm funding burden.

Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

hazenandsawyer.com

4. Cost Estimate Evaluation
An updated estimate of probable construction cost was developed for the drilling, development, testing, and equipping of a new groundwater well. This estimate follows the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) guidelines for a Class 5 estimate. A Class 5 estimate is expected to have an accuracy range of -50% to +100% relative to the estimated cost.

Due to the preliminary nature of the design and the classification of the estimate, a 40% design contingency was included. All costs are presented in 2025 dollars. The estimated probable construction cost is summarized in Table 4 below.

Table 4: Cost Estimate
No. Cost Item Total ($)
1 Well Drilling and Development $790,000
2 Well Pump and VFD and Piping $290,000
3 Well Building $120,000
4 Site Work $90,000
5 Yard Piping $60,000
6 Electrical and Controls $210,000
7 Design Contingency $620,000
8 Total including Design Contingency: $2,180,000
9 Furnish new pump instead of reusing existing $740,000 10 Total including with new pump: $2,920,000
The cost estimate is based on the following key assumptions:
 The well will have a nominal diameter of 14 inches and a depth of 500 feet below grade.  The base cost includes relocating the existing 100hp pump from the existing well to the new well. A new VFD will be provided. Rental of a temporary pump is included for approximately 1 week during switchover. An additional cost for a new 250-horsepower vertical turbine pump is included below the line if a larger pump is required.  A 10-foot by 10-foot concrete masonry unit (CMU) building will house the pump.  Site work, yard piping, electrical, and controls are estimated as a percentage of the total cost based on similar past projects plus some items as noted by the City such as new sidewalk along Palm Ave, extending the existing chainlink fence around the new wellhead structure, Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

hazenandsawyer.com
installation of a manual transfer switch for future portable generator hook-up, and a security camera and panel.
 A new motor control center (MCC) is not included. It is assumed that power and controls will be provided by existing onsite equipment. Electrical costs are limited to new conduit and conductors between existing and new equipment, along with instrumentation at the wellhead.

Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

hazenandsawyer.com

5. Recommendations
Based on the range of funding sources evaluated, it is recommended that the City move forward with applying for a low-interest loan through the DWSRF to finance the Well #4 Replacement Project. The DWSRF program offers the most favorable financial terms and aligns well with the project's scope and objectives.

In addition, the City should actively monitor federal grant opportunity announcements, including those from the USBR, which may offer supplemental funding opportunities in the future. While such grants could help reduce the City's long-term financial burden, the availability and timing of these opportunities remain uncertain. Given this uncertainty, it is not recommended that the City rely on potential federal grant funding as part of its primary financial planning for the project. However, if relevant grant opportunities are released, the City should promptly evaluate the associated costs, benefits, and administrative requirements to determine whether pursuing supplemental funding would be advantageous. This flexible, proactive approach allows the City to move forward with a secure funding path while remaining positioned to capitalize on additional opportunities as they arise.

Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Luhcjorff E
Sccrlmcrnini
Consulting Engineers
6t,i':;;:@;#
Proposal to Provide
Engineering Services for Well 4
Replaceme nt (Cl P #0822-24.06lCity of Sebastopol
DECEMBER B, 2025
Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

LSCE
December 8,2025 LSCE No. 25-2-196
Elissa Overton
Engineering Technician ll
City of Sebastopol
714 Johnson Street
Sebastopol, CA95472
SUBJECT Response to RFP - Engineering Services for Well 4 Replacement (ClP #0822-24.061 Dear Ms. Overton,
Luhdorff & Scalmanini Consulting Engineers (LSCE) is pleased to submit our qualifications and proposal to assist the City of Sebastopol with professional services related to the design of a replacement well for the City's existing Well 4, as well as the design of the associated replacement well pump station.

Based on our understanding of the project after reviewing the City's Request for Proposal (RFp), the work to be completed generally includes permitting assistance, preparation of well and pump station project specifications, preparation of a well and pump station design and engineers estimate, and assisting the City with financing and /or grant funding to be used for the Well 4 replacement well and pump station, with the understanding that the city will issue a separate RFP for construction-phase services at a future date.

LSCE has a long history of successfully designing and installing hundreds of community water-supply wells throughout California, providing us with a uniquely comprehensive understanding of new well projects and the challenges they present. We are confident that our extensive experience and demonstrated record of delivering successful groundwater projects statewide will support a smooth and efficient effort, culminating in a welldesigned replacement well and pump station that fully meets the city's objectives.

Additionally, while LSCE is headquartered in Woodland, our project manager, Charlie Jenkins works remotely in Santa Rosa, He can be at the City's offices or the project site within approximately twenty minutes, providing timely in-person support should project issues, concerns, or questions arise. Charlie grew up in Sebastopol and maintains long-standing family and community ties in the area. This personal connection further reinforces his commitment to the project's success and to providing dedicated support to the City throughout its completion.

LSCE prides itself on the close working relationships that we develop with our clients. As such, we will work closely with City staff during all phases of the project to meet their needs and expectations, The team assembled by LSCE forthe City's project is second to none in terms of experience and track record of successfully completing projects similar to those outlined in the RFp.

We have reviewed our current and projected obligations and determined that we have the necessary resources to complete this project in a timely and cost-efficient manner. We will be happy to respond to any questions you may have regarding our proposal. We look forward to the opportunity to assist the City on this project. We have also reviewed the City's standard contract and insurance requirements and have no exceptions. 500 1st Street, Woodland, CA 95695 . Tel. 530.551.0109 . Fax. 530.661.G806 . lsce.com Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

As company president, Scott Lewis is authorized to negotiate contract terms and make binding agreements on behalf of LSCE. lf you have any questions regarding our proposal, please contact Charlie Jenkins, our proposed project manager for this project. He can be reached at [email protected] or 530.661.0109.

Sincerely,
Luhdorff & Scalmanini, Consulting Engineers
M Se-l<<
kins, PG
Senior Geologist
Luhdorff and Scalma nini, Consulting Engineers
500 1st Street, Woodland, CA 95695
Tel. 530.661.0109
Scott Lewis, PG
Senior Principal Geologist I President
Charlie Jenkins, PG
Senior Geologist
530.661.0109
cjenkins@lsce. com
Firm lnformation LSCE Authorized Contact
FEDERAT TAX lD - 20-1984423
AJtLscE
Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Table of Contents

1. Team Background
LSCE
Subconsu lta nts.......

2. Project Team

3. Experience

4. Project Understanding and Approach
Understanding
Approach
5, Detailed Scope of Work.....

6.Fee Estimate (COST OMITTED)..

7. Proposed Schedule
L

1. I
2 4
7 7
7 8
,.,.....12
15 4rt LscE City of Sebastopol I Well 4 Replacement I December 8, 2025 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Section L
Tea m Backgrou nd
LSCE
Luhdorff and Scalmanini, Consulting Engineers (LSCE)
is a consulting and services organization that, for over 45 years, has provided public and private entities with hydrogeologic and civil engineering services related to the investigation, development, use, protection, and
management of groundwater. LSCE was founded to
fill a recognized need for technical and management
expertise in a broad range of issues associated with
groundwater resource development, its efficient
utilization, and protection,
LSCE's primary clients are municipalities, water
districts, and other public agencies, as well as
agricultural, corporate, and private interests
throughout California. Many of our clients are repeat
clients and use our services regularly, which is a
testament to the quality and economic value of our
professional services. Our staff includes experts in
hydrogeologic investigations, site characterization,
monitoring and production well design, well
construction and testing, well rehabilitation, water
resources management, permitting, groundwater
modeling, pump selection and pump station
design, geographic information systems (GlS),
database design, and AutoCAD (ACAD) drafting.

Our integrated approach leverages our experience
and expertise in groundwater and engineering to
develop straightforward and economical solutions to
our clients' water resource needs. LSCE is uniquely
positioned to address the City's water infrastructure
needs. With 45 years of experience and a proven track
record, LSCE's expert staff and teaming partners will
seamlessly integrate to ensure the success of the Well
4 Replacement.

Subconsultants
^1| f Frisch Electrical Engineering (Frisch)
h f specializes in electrical engineering for the
I 7 water, wastewater, and power industry. The
firm has 23 years of experience, with staff averaging
over 20 years of experience each. Their expertise
encompasses power distribution, protective relaying,
hardware controls, PLCs, SCADA systems,
programming, and instrumentation.
:: PeoPles Associates Structural
fADtr Engineers (PASE) has provided
structural engineering for industrial, infrastructure,
institutional, commercial, and residential projects for the last 34 years. From their San Jose headquarters
and Northern California satellite offices, they provide design and construction phase services, seismic
evaluations and retrofi ts, structu ra I cond ition
assessments, and peer reviews.

Dokken Engineering, Environmental
Services Division (Dokken) has completed
CEQA/NEPA documentation for over 600
projects throughout California, including more than 40
water distribution projects in Northern California. Their staff have experience preparing all levels of CEQA/
NEPA documentation, from CEQA Categorical
Exemptions and NEPA Categorical Exclusions to
Environmental lmpact Reports (ElR) and Environmental
I mpact Statements (ElS).

Phelps & Associates Land Surveyors
(Phelps) specializes in boundary
retracement, topographic maPPing,
subdivisions, and construction staking. Formed in L976, Phelps is based in Sebastopol and serves the counties
of Sonoma, Marin, and Napa. Their staff are licensed in California and utilize the latest in robotic total stations, along with the most current generation of real-time
kin e matic G loba I Positio n ing System receivers.

1. 4tt LscE CitV of Sebastopol I Well 4 Replacement I December 8, 2025 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Secilon 2
Project Team
LSCE has assembled a team of experienced professionals to meet the project's goals and objectives outlined in the RFQ. LSCE proposes a project team that includes key hydrogeologists, geologists, and civil, structural, and electrical engineers who have worked together as a team for over 20 years on similar well, pump station, and watertreatment projects. The team members were selected based on their experience, qualifications, and proven track record of successfully completing projects of similar scope to that outlined in the RFe. The primary team members proposed for the project are shown in the project organization chart below. ln addition tothe keyteam members below,the project managerwill havethe abilitytoselectfrom a pool of experienced project and staff professionals to assist with the project as needed. Following the organizationalchart is a brief biography for each key team member, with one-page resumes for all team members available in Appendix A.

Bold = Leadership role
o2
,FO
Charlie Jenkins, PG Scott Lewis, PG
Charlie Jenkins, PG Jason Coleman, PE
Oscar Serrano, PE
Tryston Cruz, EIT
Jameson Garcia, EIT
Jaques DeBra
Thomas Frisch, PE (Frisch)

STRUCTURAL
Amy Bakker {Dokken}

SURVEYOR

ELECTRICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
Timothy Elliot, SE (PASE) Joe Hughes, PLS {Phelps)

CITY OF SEBASTOPOL
PROJECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL.IN-CHARGE

FUNDING

WELL ENGINEERING

SUBCONSULTANTS
4Jt LscE City of Sebastopol I Well 4 Replacernent I December 8, 2025 2 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

LSCE Staff
I Charlie Jenkins, PG - Project Manager/Well Lead: A seasoned geologist with 1.7 years of experience in J:;::sJ;tfliJl;ffi?;tix:"JfXTf"fi,TJ;il1ti:?':J:i;:[fifiliH:[::ilT*::',i;"1,",',1"u,",''' projects, ensuring compliance with industry standards, and delivering high-quality technical reports, Expertise spanning subsurface investigations, well design, construction management, geophysical survey interpretation, and water quality assessments.

I Scott Lewis, PG - Principal-in-Charge: Over 25 years of experience throughout California with t :;:i:,;il:;ii,tTf;:xfi;[i;:::ii']:;1:;'ffi[t:Hii::Triitli;]i1'ilillxxill;lil' design, construction oversight, testing, and evaluation of monitoring and municipal water wells. Scott was a technical advisor for the recent update of the California Water Well Standards, Bulletin 74-81'.

T
Jason Coleman, PE - Engineering [ead: Over 17 years of experience in well pump stations, water distribution and water treatment design, and related construction management. Experience includes engineering design of well pumps, booster pumps, pipeline distribution systems, storage tanks, surface water and groundwater treatment facilities, as well as preparation of engineering drawings and specifications, construction management, and CEQA studies.

Oscar Serrano, PE - Engineering Support: Over 20 years of experience in engineering design, feasibility studies, water master planning, urban water management plans, and the design of water, wastewater, a nd stormwater facilities.
;
Tryston Cruz, EIT - Engineering Support: Four years of professional water resources and environmental engineering experience. Pump station inspection experience and knowledgeable in submersible and verticalturbine lineshaft well pump installation practices. Design and record plans for water infrastructure projects relating to consolidation, irrigation, pipeline replacement, and pump stations.

F
Jameson Garcia, EIT - Engineering Support: A recent Civil Engineering graduate with a concentration in water resources. Supported submittal and RFI review, ensuring compliance with project specifications, and prepared and updated engineering plans. ^il,
Jacques DeBra - Funding Lead: Over 30 years of experience in public water utilities management, consulting, and as an AWWA water instructor. Developed funding strategies to maximize grant funding for local and regional activities. Secured and administered over 5400 million in funding. grant funds through every State Proposition funding program since 1988, as well as California l-Bank, FlA, and other federal funding programs.

Secu red

EPA, WI
Subconsultants
ffi Thomas Frisch, PE (Frisch) - Electrical Engineering Lead: Water supply project experience since 1991 with expertise in power, controls, instrumentation, and communications. As a Consultant, he has designed the electrical systems for over 250 water projects ranging from small pump stations to la rge-scale treatment plants.
-
Timothy Elliott, SE (PASE) - Structural Engineering Lead: Over 25 years of analysis, design, and f construction experience, including watel wastewater, and stormwater facilities (pump stations, wells, -
storage tanks, and underground structures); vehicular and pedestrian bridges; civil infrastructure facilities (culverts, channels, and retaining walls); anchorage of equipment and evaluation of existing facilities. tI Amy Bakker (Dokken) - Environmental Lead: 14 years of environmental compliance experience, f including NEPA/CEaA environmental documents, regulatory permits, and technical studies.

I ExceptiJnally ri itt"d at delivering defensible documents and conducting biological surveys. Experience assisting with Federal and State regulatory permitting and compliance with environmental laws and regulations.

Joseph Hughes, PLS (Phelps) - Survey Lead: A licensed Professional Engineer with over 25 years of survey experience. lnvolved in every aspect of surveying, including running and coordinating surveys in ril the field and managing projects from proposalthrough completion. 3 4Jt LscE City of Sebastopol I Well 4 Replacement I December 8, 2025 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Section 3
Experience
LSCE has worked on hundreds
of projects similar to the
requirements described in the
RFQ. The table at right summarizes
clients for whom we have
completed related projects. More
detailed project descriptions and
references for three projects are
provided below.

AKT Santa Nella lnvestors
Blue Lakes Mutual Water Company a
Butte County
California Water Services Company
Citrus Heights Water District O
Del Oro Water Company
Diablo Water District
Merced, City of
Millview County WD
Morgan Hill, City of O
Mountain View, City of
Natomas Mutual Water Company
Pittsburg, City of O
Rural North Vacaville Water District a
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
Sacramento County Water Agency
Sacramento Suburban WD O
San Bruno, City of
San Francisco PUC a
San Jose Water O
San Jose, City of
Santa Clara, City of
Sierra Nevada Brewing
Simplot/Glenn Springs Holdings
Spreckels Water Company O
Stanford University
Town of Discovery Bay CSD O
Vacaville, City of O
Watsonville, City of
Winters, City of
Yolo County CSD
o
o
o
o
a
O
o
o
a
o
O
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
a
a
o
o
o
a
o
o
o
o
a
O
o
o
a
o
O
o
a
o
a
a
o
o
O
o
o
o
o
O
O
o
O
o
a
o
a
o
o
o
a
o
o
a
o
a
o
o
o
o
o
o
a
o
a
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
a
o
O
o
o
O
o
o
o

RELATED LSCE EXPERIENCE SUMMARY
!
(E
oc F0u'Eg.F
v!!=
-t! <o5c,
c
.gp
IA
o
o
o
=
.p(,t
o
o
c
o
o
t6
CL
E
3 oh .sp
LL-aA oo '€B
ioo !C
SE
bo
E
c
lJc
o
o
(!
(t
4$ LscE City of Sebastopr:l I Well 4 Replacernent I December 8, 2025 O
4 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Well 8 Site lnvestigation and PumP
Station Design

TOWN OF DISCOVERY BAY
DATES:2022 - 2O24; REFERENCE: Ms. Dina Breitstein,
G e n e ra I M a n a ge r, 925.63 4.1,731, d b re itste i n @ to d b. ca.gov
TEAM: Scott Lewis, PG (Wells Project Manager),
Charlie Jenkins {Wells Project Support), Jason
Coleman, PE (Engineering Project Manager), Oscar
Serrano, PE (Engineering Support), Jameson Garcia, EIT
(Engineering Support)
LSCE has provided engineering and hydrogeologic
services to the Town of Discovery Bay (TODB) for over
25 years, offering comprehensive engineering and
hydrogeologic solutions that encompass groundwater
supply, treatment, and distribution. The Town relies
exclusively on groundwater from several aquifers
whose water quality ranges from fresh to brackish.

LSCE's work has focused on understanding these
aquifers in detail, then developing solutions that
protect water quality, improve system reliability, and
support long-term planning. LSCE's work with the
Town has included groundwater investigations, well
siting studies, well design, construcfion oversight,
pump station design, treatment plant design, well
reha bilitation programs, a nd distribution system
analysis, design, and construction.

A major component of LSCE's work for the Town
involves site-specifi c hydrogeologic investigations
to identify brackish water intervals and design
municipal wells that draw from the most productive
freshwater zones. These investigations have combined
historic well data, geologic records, and downhole
geophysics to develop conceptual production well
designs for each new site. LSCE has overseen the
drilling of test holes, installation of multi-completion monitoring wells, and collection of depth-specific
water quality samples. These efforts have led directly
to the construction of multiple new municipal wells
that meet both yield and water quality objectives,
including the most recent investigation and design
for Well No. 8, which features an iron and manganese
treatment system capable of producing up to 1,980
gallons per minute.
ln addition to well development, LSCE serves as
the Town's District Engineer, providing strategic
planning, regulatory compliance, asset management
development, and hydraulic modeling. LSCE prepared
the most recent Water Master Plan, Urban Water
Management Plan, and annualSB 555-compliant
water audits. LSCE also completed the Town's Risk
and Resilience Assessment and Emergency Response
Plan in accordance with AWIA requirements. These
efforts help the Town navigate evolving regulatory
requirements while maintaining a clear roadmap for
capital improvements and system resiliency.

Acappella Well 21

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DAI"ES:2O2L - Ongoing; REFERENCE; Dalia Manaois,
Principa I Engineer, 650-676-7 042 DManaois@
san bru no.ca.gov
TEAM: Scott Lewis, PG (Project Manager), Charlie
Jenkins (Wells Lead), Jason Coleman, PE (Engineering
Lead)
City of Sebastopol I Well 4 Replacetnent I December 8, 2025 5 $Jr LscE
Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

LSCE conducted a detailed site investigation
that included test hole drilling, monitoring well
installation, and water quality sampling to inform
the final well design. The results supported LSCE's
preparation of well design documents, construction
specifications, and DWSAP materials. LSCE
coordinated with DDW for approvals, assisted with
bidding, and provided construction oversight through
drilling, development, and testing. The completed
well exceeded the original design flow rate and
performance requirements.

LSCE also prepared and oversaw the destruction of
Well 15, which had reached the end of its service
life. Additionally, LSCE is contributing to the design
and construction oversight of the associated pump
station, with completion expected by the end of 2027
Wild Wings Wells and Treatment

YOLO COUNTY
DAT E S: 2O2O - Ongoing; R E F E R E N C E. Yana pavlova, Business Services Manager, 530.666.S157, yana.

[email protected]
TEAM: Jason Coleman, PE (Project Manager), Scott
Lewis, PG (Technical Advisor), Charlie Jenkins, pG
(Project Geologist), Jameson Garcia, EIT (Engineering
Support)
LSCE has supported the Wild Wings County Service
Area (CSA) public water system for more than twenty
years. The firm designed the original water supply,
storage, pumping, and distribution facilities when the
system was constructed in 2002 and has continued to
provide technical guidance as the community's water
quality and supply conditions evolved. This long-term
involvement has created a detailed understanding
of system constraints, regulatory obligations, and
operational needs, which has been critical as the CSA's groundwater conditions changed over time,
Arsenic treatment planning began in 2018 when
concentrations at the Canvasback well exceeded the
State Maximum Contaminant Level. LSCE prepared
preliminary treatment concepts for this source, which
remained in emergency standby status. Rising arsenic
levels at the Pintail well in 2020 prompted a broader
feasibility analysis. Work included potable and nonpotable demand evaluations, treatment sizing, and a comparison of adsorption and coagulation filtration
technologies. The review also addressed chemicalfeed
design, backwash and waste handling needs, longterm maintenance considerations, and capital and operating costs. LSCE coordinated vendor outreach,
developed a pilot testing protocol, and supported
pilot testing efforts with system operators, treatment
vendors, and the University of California, Davis. These evaluations culminated in conceptual layouts and
refined design recommendations for siting treatment
at the Pintail well.

From2O27 through 2023, LSCE advanced the
arsenic treatment project through full design. plans,
specifications, and a comprehensive cost estimate
were prepared for a 500 gpm adsorption treatment
system capable of treating water from Pintail as
well as from the Canvasback well through the
existing raw water pipeline. The design includes dual
treatment vessels on a skid, pH adjustment systems, a
15,500-gallon backwash tank, and complete process,
electrical, and control improvements. Construction
management support commenced in late 2023 and
has included submittal review, RFI coordination,
field visits, progress payment reviews, and regular
communication with County staff to ensure scope,
budget, and schedule alignment.

Declining groundwater levels in the region prompted
the CSA to also pursue an additional supply well
and associated pump stafion in parallel with the
treatment effort. LSCE completed the well siting
evaluation and regulatory concurrence, prepared
CEQA documentation, and provided design and
construction-phase support for the new Wood Duck
production well and pump station. The well was
drilled to a depth of approximately L,150 feet and
constructed as an L8-inch diameter municipal supply
well. Planned above-ground improvements include
station piping and valving, a vertical turbine well
pump, electrical and control systems, and provisions
for future backup generator, chemical treatment, and
tie-in to the distribution system. Construction of the
Wood Duck Pump Station is now underway.'
4tt LscE City of Sebastopol I Well 4 Replacement I December 8, 2025 6 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Project U nderstanding and Approach
Section 4.

Understanding
LSCE understands that the City of Sebastopol
(City) relies exclusively on groundwater to meet its
potable water system demands, with no interties
to neighboring agencies. This creates a strong
dependence on individual production wells for
system capacity and redundancy. Well 4, constructed
in 1953, has reached the end of its useful service
life, and its replacement is critical for maintaining
reliability during peak demands and drought periods.

The City's objective is to construct a new well and
pump station at the existing site that maximizes
yield, performance, and operational efficiency for the
subject Well 4 Replacement Project (ClP #0822-24.06).

Significant elements of the project include funding
assistance, permitting, well and pump station design,
and preparation of project specifications and bid
documents.

All project elements defined in the RFP are fully
incorporated into LSCE's work plan. The plan identifies each task, the work to be completed within that task,
and the associated cost. lt distinguishes investigation activities from well design and pump station design,
while maintaining a clear sequence that supports
efficient project delivery. LSCE is familiar with the
funding alternatives presented in Appendix D and will
integrate those considerations into the design and
permitting approach. The level of detail in the work
plan reflects what is required to investigate and design a fully permitted replacement well and pump station
that meets the City's needs. This proposal includes
services through completion of the well and pump
station design only, with the understanding that the
City will issue a separate RFP for construction-phase
services at a later date.

Approach
For more than forty-five years, LSCE has continually
refined its approach to projects similar to that
described in the City's RFP. We continually refine our
project approach based on the experience gained
from completing hundreds of similar well pump
station projects, advances in investigative and design
methods, and changing regulatory requirements.

LSCE's general approach is to achieve a practical and
straightforward design that meets the City's budget
and schedule objectives, while also ensuring that all
design aspects have been thoroughly considered.

LSCE has reviewed the funding TM completed by
Hazen Sawyer, which provides the City with the
recommendation of pursuing DWSRF funding for
this project. The DWSRF program offers low interest
rates; however, it would delay project delivery by
3 to 5 years due to the long lead times associated
with SRF funding, including the review and approval
of funding applications, as well as the execution of
funding agreements. The LSCE proposal assumes
providing support for DWSRF funding based on our
success in securing DWSRF funding for our clients. lf
the project delivery time line is important to the City for this critically important water infrastructure, LSCE can assist the City with a project funding strategy that would identify the best available funding sources that
would expedite the project delivery schedule, resulting in lower funding administrative costs and reducing
water system risk to a more acceptable level.

LSCE's approach for this project will include the
early concurrent execution of key site investigations,
preliminary design elements, and CEQA review, as well
as the identification of required mitigation measures
to identify any issues that may affect project efficiency and timeline.

Other aspects of our project approach are outlined
below. They are aligned with the efforts outlined
in the Detailed Work Plan section of this proposal,
enabling us to proceed with multiple headings to
ensure timely project completion. Creative insight,
innovative response to perplexing challenges, and
sound technical knowledge to support practical
engineered solutions are integral to our practice.

WTLL DESIGN
To begin the project, LSCE will evaluate the site in
terms of constructability, specifically the ability to
locate a well on the site that meets all SWRCB-DDW
minimum setbacks from sanitary features, as well as the establishment of a control zone around the well. LSCE's extensive experience with well siting, well construction, pump station design, and operation enables us to
critically evaluate and identify any challenges or
impediments to the design or construction and use
of a well and pump station, and develop strategies to
address any identified issues early in the planning and design stage ofthe project.
4Jt LscE City of Sebastopol I Well 4 Replacement I Decernber 8, 2025 7 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

LSCE will utilize lithologic, well construction, well
performance, and water quality data from existing
City wells, along with other relevant data sources and
information, to refine its current understanding of
the hydrogeologic system in the Sebastopol area. This
refinement of our understanding of the hydrogeologic
landscape will serve as the basis for our site-specific hydrogeologic assessment and will inform the
preparation of a well design. Additionally, LSCE will
prepare a detailed engineer's estimate presenting the
projected costs for the replacement well.

LSCE will prepare well construction and testing
specifications that include detailed requirements to be followed by the well drilling contractor during every
phase of the project. These specifications will adhere to the most up-to-date well drilling industry standards and ensure compliance with all pertinent regulations and
permit requirements.

PUMP STATION DESIGN
LSCE has identified the following significant project
elements associated with the well pump station design
phase, which will be key to the project's successful
completion on budget and within schedule.

Utilities - LSCE will request that the City provide
any additional information pertaining to the site,
including existing City facilities, and other utilities via as-builts. LSCE will tie in to existing utilities (water, storm, sewer, electrical, etc.) onsite as needed to
support the new well pump facility. Due to the long
lead time required to secure electrical power to the
site, one of the first items to be addressed is the
filing of the application for electrical service with
PG&E.

Section 5.

Detailed Scope of Work
LSCE has reviewed and understands the project as
outlined in the City's RFP. The Scope of Work outlined
in the tasks below encompasses all the core objectives
outlined in the RFP.

Task 1- Project Coordination,
Meetings, and Administration
TASK 1.1- KICKOFF AND INFORMATION

REQU EST
LSCE's work on the project will begin with a kickoff
meeting with City staff and key LSCE team members
to discuss the various aspects of the project. ltems
Existing Property - LSCE will work with all parties
to minimize any schedule impacts associated with
identifying the space required for a new well pump
station site within the existing lot.

Building - LSCE understands that the new well
pump, electrical equipment, chemical feed
equipment, and station piping will need to be
housed in a new building. LSCE envisions the
building to be wood-framed to match the structure
type of the existing building onsite. LSCE has
developed a unique, removable roof design for
wellhead access, which is used on many of our well
pump stations for the City's consideration.

Well Pump - LSCE will evaluate the new well
design and construction information to confirm
the suitability and proper placement of the pump
already purchased by the City. This includes
reviewing specific capacity data to establish
appropriate head conditions, assessing projected
pumping water levels and screen intervals to ensure
correct setting depths, and verifying alignment and
plumbness survey results so that column diameter
and shaft tolerances do not create vibration or wear
issues. LSCE will also review whether any extended
suction ortailpipe modifications are needed to
position the pump intake in an optimal zone. lf any
compatibility concerns arise between the well's final
characteristics a nd the City-furn ished equipment,
LSCE will identify necessary adjustments and
coordinate with the City during the design process.

LSCE assumes that after the well is constructed and
well pump testing is completed, the City (with LSCE's
assistance under a separate contract) will finalize
the well pump design to incorporate actual specific
capacity and production capacity for the well.
such as contact information, chain of command,
the City's project expectations, respective roles and
responsibilities, schedule, design preferences and
parameters, and site constraints shall be discussed at
the kick-off meeting. Following the meeting, LSCE will
provide the City with a list of requested information.

TASK 1.2 - PROJECT COORDINATION,

M EETINGS, AN D ADM I N ISTRATION
Key LSCE team members will attend regular design
meetings with the City to discuss various aspects
of the project. For each meeting, LSCE will prepare
and distribute meeting agendas, minutes, and
4Jt LscE City of Sebastopr:l I Well 4 Replacetnent I December 8, 202S 8 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

summaries of action items. LSCE will also provide
frequent updates via email or telephone as needed
throughout the project. This task also provides project management and administrative activities such as: (a)
Contractual Arra ngements, (b) Ongoing Exa mination
Regarding Adherence to The Scope, Budget, and
Schedule, (c) Coordination of Staff Resources (d)
lnternal Review of Work Products, (e) Management of
Subcontractors, (f) Billing Review, and (g) Scoping and Budgeting.

Task 2 - Permitting Assistance
TASI( 2.1" _ PERMITTING ASSISTANCE
Through our work on numerous projects in the past,
LSCE has developed a good working relationship
with the SWRCB and other regional permitting and
regulatory entities and can assist in expediting
all necessary applications and supporting permit
documents in a cost-efficient manner. LSCE envisions
that the following permitting activities will be
required to complete the project.

SWRCB-DDW Water Supply Permit Amendment -
LSCE will coordinate with the SWRCB-DDW and the
City to provide all necessary supporting technical
information to complete the water supply permit
amendment package, which will be submitted to
the SWRCB-DDW. LSCE has completed numerous
new and amended water supply permits and has
a thorough understanding of the SWRCB-DDW
process and the required submittals. A draft water
supply amendment will be submitted to the SWRCBDDW following construction of the production well.

Following the completion and acceptance of the
project, LSCE will assist the City with the preparation of the final DDW amended water supply permit,
which will include updates to the information from
the preliminary submittal and the submission of the
final As-Built drawings prepared by LSCE.

CEQA - LSCE envisions that the project meets the
requirements for a CEQA categorical exemption.

LSCE will prepare CEQA documentation conslstent
with a Class 1 or Class 3 Categorical Exemption,
including drafting the exemption form, providing
supporti ng technical rationale, coordinating with
City Planning staff, and assisting the City in filing the Notice of Exemption.

Other Permltting Activities - LSCE will contact
applicable agencies as needed to establish
permitting requirements for well drilling (County of
Sonoma), well siting concurrence (Department of
Drinking Water), encroachment permits (City), and
discharge requirements for development and pump
testing fluids (City).

Task 3 - Site Specific lnvestigation
TASI( 3.1_ INITIAL SITE ASSESSMENI
Well Siting Review - LSCE will complete a thorough
onsite inspection/assessment of the site. Specifically, LSCE will evaluate the well site in relation to the
siting and constructability of the new well, as well as the DDW setback distances from sanitary features
and control zone requirements.

Hydrogeologic Review - The goal of the
hydrogeologic review is to determine the probable
yield, water quality, anticipated well depth, screen
intervals, static and pumping water levels, specific
capacity, and potential impacts on nearby wells due
to the pumping of the new well.

Evaluation of Potential lmpacts to Groundwater
Quality - LSCE will investigate possible sources of
groundwater contamination in the vicinity of the
project site.

TASK 3.2 _ WELL DESIGN

RECOMMENDATION REPORT
LSCE will prepare and deliver to the City a well design recommendation report that provides justification for
the recommended well design. The report will include
a preliminary well design profile and a preliminary
construction cost estimate.

TASK 3.3 _ SITING CONCU RRENCE
After the City approves the well design, LSCE will
prepare an initial DDW submittal document requesting
siting and design concurrence for the new well, based
on compliance with DDW and DWR regulations. The
initial submlttal will include a preliminary well design, site layout, location map indicating location and
distances of sanitary features from the proposed well
location, delineation of the wellhead control zone, and the preliminary DWSAP.

Task 4 - Production Well Design
TASK 4.1_ PRODUCTION WELL

CONSTRUCTION SPECI FICATIONS
LSCE will prepare specifications that include detailed
construction requirements to be followed by the
well drilling contractor during every phase of the
project, including minimum acceptable methods
for drilling fluid control, well development, pump
testing, and well performance standards. Other
site-specific items will include requirements for the
4Jt LscE City of Sebastopol I Well 4 Replacement I December 8, 2025 9 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

containment and disposal of drill cuttings, as well as
the handling of discharge water during development
and test pumping, in accordance with applicable local,
state, and federal regulations. The production well
specifications will include comprehensive design plans, accompanied by an engineer's cost estimate for the
City's use.

LSCE will attend up to two regulatory coordination
meetings with SWRCB-DDW and the Water Board,
supporting the City with technical presentations and
responding to regulator questions related to siting,
well design, and water supply permit amendments
under this task.

LSCE will also support one public outreach meeting
under this task by preparing presentation materials,
summarizing technical content in accessible formats,
and attending meetings with City staff to respond
to community questions related to well siting,
design, construction sequencing, and water-quality
considerations.

Task 5 - Pump Station Design
TASK 5.1_ PRELIMINARY PUMP STATION
DESI6N ACTIVITIES
LSCE will meet with and conduct a site visit with
City personnel to discuss the overall pump station
p roject d esign req u i re me nts, construction concepts, and site constraints at the existing site. The primary
goal of the site visit is to discuss the design elements required to serve the new facility, including water
supply connection, storm drain pump-to-waste
(overboard) operations, building sewer systems,
electrical services, radio commu nications, access
controls, and other relevant aspects. To aid in this
preliminary design effort, LSCE will distribute a design basis checklist document to the City, enabling it to
quickly obtain a comprehensive understanding of the
City's preferences for the functionality, operation, and equipment to be designed.

The LSCE Team will complete a topographic survey
basemap in AutoCAD format for the project site.

The basemap will be used for the preliminary layout
of the pump station, which will, in turn, be used for
preparing the final bid set plans. LSCE will incorporate City-provided standard plans, as-builts, and base
mapping (as available) into the design process to
ensure consistency with existing infrastructure.

It is assumed that an existing geotechnical site
investigation/study is available from the City for
purposes of facilitating the overall project design,
including structural foundation and building design
elements.

Under this task, LSCE will also develop a Preliminary
Design Report (PDR). The report will summarize
design criteria, site constraints, and key assumptions
established during early coordination with the City.

It will present preliminary layouts for the building,
site civil improvements, process piping, electrical
systems, and instrumentation. The report will also
include an evaluation of the City-furnished pump
equipment for compatibility with well performance
data, along with any recommended adjustments to
accommodate the equipment within the pump station
design. Additionally, the PDR will outline anticipated
permitting needs, identify any remaining data gaps,
and provide a preliminary engineer's estimate of
probable construction cost. The document will serve
as the basis for the development of the initial 50%
design submittal (as part of Task 5.2) and will confirm alignment between LSCE and the City on scope,
configuration, and design direction before advancing
into detailed design.

TASK 5.2 _ PUMP STATION DESIGN AN D

CO NSTRUCTION SPECI F ICATIONS
This task covers the scope of work required to prepare
the engineering plans and technical specifications
for the project, consisting of a well pump and motor,
motor control center, discharge piping, chemical
treatment system, instrumentation, electrical control
panels, SCADA communication, a wood-framed
building to house the above-ground components
onsite, and all other required site improvements. The
design will also address all other site modifications
and improvements, including grading, drainage,
paving, fencing, painting, etc. Following submittal of
the PDR, the detailed design will be completed at the
50% and 100% stages, and an Engineer's Estimate of
project construction costs will be prepared with each
design phase. After the City's review of each design
phase, LSCE will prepare the complete set of plans
and specifications for the subsequent design stage,
incorporating any comments received from the City in
the previous design reviews.

LSCE will attend up to two regulatory coordination
meetings with SWRCB-DDW and the Water Board to
obtain approval for the well pump station plans, the
water supply permit amendment, and to coordinate
field visits during project startup.

LSCE will also support one public outreach meeting
under this task by preparing presentation materials,
summarizing technical content in accessible formats,
4Jt LscE City of Sebastopr:l I Well 4 Replacement I December 8, 2025 10 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

and attending follow-up meetings with City staff to
respond to community questions related to the well
pump station design and construction scope.

Task 6 - Funding Assistance
LSCE will assist the City with preparing and submitting a DWSRF funding application, including assembling
tech nical docu mentation, schedules, preliminary cost
estimates, a nd environmental compliance materials.

TASK 6.1- DWSRF CONSTRUCTION

FUNDING APPLICATION
LSCE will coordinate with the City to incorporate
the needed information and data for the proposed
Project to complete the DWSRF Construction Funding
Application. The Project scope of work, budget, and
schedule will be developed in coordination with the
city, consistent with the 2025 DWSRF Construction
Funding Program guidelines. LSCE will prepare and
submit the required DWSRF Construction Funding
Application documents, including the application
elements, as follows:
. General Package - DWSRF Construction Funding
Application Package
. Technical Package - DWSRF Construction Funding
Application Package (100% design)
. Environmental Package - DWSRF Construction
Funding Application Package (CEQA-Plus)
. Financial Package - DWSRF Construction Funding
Application Package
The application elements above will be developed
based on information provided by the City. LSCE will
develop a comprehensive DWSRF construction funding
application, which will contain the four packages
outlined above.

LSCE will develop the Project Report required as
part of the Technical Package submittal and will
incorporate the 100% plans and specifications
prepared under Tasks 4 and 5 into the Project Report,
as required for a complete DWSRF funding application.

LSCE will submit a draft of the completed DWSRF
Construction Funding Application packages to the
City for review and comment before submitting the
final application. Comments from the City will be
incorporated into the final application submitted to
the SWRCB.

LSCE will submit the completed DWSRF Construction
Funding Application through the SWRCB's online
FAAST process. The process of receiving funding
approval is anticipated to occur in the fourth quarter
of 2026. The funding agency will review applications
in2027, subject to their schedule for processing other
funding applications. LSCE will work with the funding
agency to submit a complete application and to help
coordinate a timely decision for funding approval.

TASK 6.2 * DWSRF ENVIRONMENTAL

DOCU M ENTATION
This task involves preparing the minimum CEQA-Plus
requirements outlined in the DWSRF funding policy.

This would involve preparing Cultural and Biological
Resource Assessments that meet both federal
and state environmental requirements. lt is LSCE's
experience that, at a minimum, these assessments are
the required for all DWSRF construction applications
and must be completed as part of the application
approval process. These are in addition to the
proposed CEQA compliance documentation for a well
replacement, which typically involves preparing and
filing a Notice of Exemption. Any additional CEQA-Plus
or other compliance documentation required, beyond
that described above, would be prepared through
an additional task order as agreed upon between
the parties. lt has been LSCE's experience that the
DWSRF funding program often requires the most
stringent environmental docu mentation a nd processes
compared to other funding options.

TASK 6,3 _ ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCES
(OPTIONAL)
LSCE is also available to identify eligibility for
complementary programs and coordinate with City
staff on required submittals. lf the City chooses to
pursue an alternative funding source, LSCE would
assist with the funding application procurement
process and coordination with the funding agency.
4Jt LscE City of Sebastopol I Well 4 Replacetnent I Decenrber 8, 2025 11 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Section 6,
Fee Estimate
LSCE's estimated cost to complete the scope of work outlined in this proposal is based on our current understanding of the project and what would be typically expected to complete the tasks described based on our prior experience. The cost estimate assumes the following:
. A project design duration of 11-16 months.
' General Conditions, Supplemental General Conditions, and other "front-end" specifications will be prepared by the city.
. Design documents will conform to the City's standards. . The City has a Geotech report available for the existing facility. . Construction-related costs are not included.
o Any additional enviromental requirements beyond a Notice of Exemption (Task 2) and Cultural and Biological Resource Assessments (Task 6.2), are not included in the cost estimate Fees shall remain in effect for the full contract period. ln the event that the City directs LSCE to deviate from the proposed scope, or as dictated by unforeseen field conditions or events beyond LSCE's control, LSCE will provide notification of any potential changes in the estimated cost to complete the work. LSCE will not proceed with any work that deviates from the approved scope and budget until approval to proceed is granted by the City.

As required in the RFP, our cost estimate has been omitted from this PDF version of the proposal, but is included in the printed copies scheduled for delivery on Monday, December gth. 4Jt LscE City of Sebastopol I Well 4 Replacernent I December 8, 2025 L2 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Section 7
Proposed Schedule
LSCE understands that the City anticipates awarding the project to a consultant in January 2026. LSCE assumes that work on the project will begin soon thereafter. LSCE's proposed project schedule is based on the tasks outlined in this proposal, with an anticipated project completion date of December2026. The estimated completion time of the project may change (shorten/lengthen) based on the responsiveness of the City and other agencies regarding information requests, design review phases, and the ability to perform some project tasks concurrently. The key members of the assembled project teamhave collaborated on similar projects and possess the experience to effectivelV gauge workloads and commitments to other projects. LSCE has reviewed the services outlined in the RFB our current commitments, and staffing levels, and determined that we can dedicate the resources required to provide engineering and oversiBht services to the City in a timely and efficient manner, as illustrated in our proposed schedule.

Task Name
-t
TFfI -qI I\---II
a
Duration Start Finish Jan Mar Jun Jul sep Oct Dec
o
Qtr 4, 2025
Nov
Qtr 3, 2025
i Aug
Qtt 2,2026
Apr I May
Qtr 1, 2025
Feb
Task 4.1 - Production Well Construcbon Specifications 1 mon 'fue4/2t/26 MonSlTa/26 Task 5.1 - Preliminary Pump Station Design Acidvities
Task 5.2 - Pump Station Design and Constructjon Specifications 2 mons
6 mons
"lue 4/27126
rue 6l16126
Mon6/75/26
Mon L7/30/26Mon1126/26
Mon II/30126
Mon l/26/26
"lue U27 /26
1 day
1l mons
Tark 1.1 - (ickoffand lnformation RequestTask 1.2 - Project Coordination, MeetinBs and Administratjon Task 2.1 - Permifing.Assistance 3 mons rueT/27/25 Mon4/20/26 Task 3.1 - lnitial Site AssessmehtTask 3.2 - Well Design Recommendation Repoft Task 3-3 - Siting Concurrence
1 mon1 mon
1 mon
lve U27 /261ueZl24l26
'lue3/24/26
Mon2/23/26
Mon3l23/26Mo^ 4/20/26
TASK 2 - Permitting Assistance 3 mons ruel/27/26 Mon4/20/26 TAsK 1 - Proiect Coordination, Meetings, and Administration Notice to Proceed
Council Approval

11.05 llze/zs ta"i Ltl30/26
1 day TueL/2O126 Tue 7/2O/26
TAsK 4 - Production Well Design 1 mon Tue 4l7L/26 Mon 5/18/26 TASK 3 - Site Specific lnvestigation 3 mons rue rl27126 Mon 412o126 T ue I / 27 TASK 6 - Funding Assistance 11. mons / 26 Mon Ll l3O / 26 TASK 5 - Pump Station Design 8 mons rue 4l2rl26 Mon It/30/25 I L d"y wed x/2x/76' wed 1l2Ll26
CltyofSebaslopol I Wel 4Repacement | Oeaember8,2025 {r lsce Agenda Item Number
3 Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Appendix A
Team Resumes
LSCE
. Charlie Jenkins, PG
. Scott Lewis, PG
. Jason Coleman, PE
. Oscar Serrano, PE
. Tryston Cruz, EIT
. Jameson Garcia, EIT
. Jacques DeBra
Subconsultants
. Thomas Frisch, PE (Frisch)
. Tim Elliott, SE (PASE)
c Amy Bakker (Dokken)
. Joe Hughes, PLS (Phelps)
Atr LscE City 16 of Sebastopol | \tVell 4 Replacernent I Decenrber B, 2025 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

CHARLIE J EN KINS, PG
Senior Geologist
'r h ^f
Years of Experience
T7
Education
BS, Geology, California State
U niversity, Sacramento, CA
Professional Registrations
Professional Geologist
CA No. 9154
Professional Affiliations
. Groundwater Resources
Association of California
Areas of Expertise
r Project Management
. Production/Monitoring Wells
. Well Rehabilitation and Repair
. Well Siting Studies
Charlie is a seasoned geologist with 17 years of experience in geology and hydrogeology providing reliable and accurate geological insights to support project goals and regulatory requirements. He has a proven track record of successfully managing and executing various projects, ensuring compliance with industry standards. His expertise spans subsu rface investigations, construction ma nagement, geophysical su rvey interpretation, and water quality assessments.

Charlie has extensive well experience, including site assessment, well design, and construction management during the drilling, construction, and testing phases ofthe project. He conducts subsurface investigations for hydrogeologic characterization, interprets geophysical surveys, performs grain size distribution analyses, and oversees water quality sample collection. He prepares specifications and permit applications, monitors permit compliance, reviews technical submittals, and prepares technical reports, He efficiently navigates the challenging conditions associated with small well sites on many projects.

EXPE RIE NCE
Well Replacement Projects, San Jose Water, Santa Clara County, CA (as recently as 20241: Project Geologist. Over a dozen replacement well installations, including assisting with the well design.

Bennett and NDC Well Design, Natomas Mutual Water Company, CA (as recently as 2023): Proiect Manager.

Well Destruction Projects, San Jose Water Company, CA (as recently as 20241: Project Manager. Over 18 well destruction projects.

Well Siting Study and Well 4 Design, City of Watsonville, Santa Cruz County, CA (2021): Project Geologist. Assisted with the well siting study, summary report, and well design.

Well No. 8 Pump Station and Treatment Design, City of Winters, Yolo County, CA (2021): Project Geologist.

Monitoring Well Installations, Napa Valley Subbasin GSP lmplementation, CA (as recently as2O24l:. Project Geologist' Over L2 well installations on small sites.

Monitoring Well lnstallations, Solano Subbasin GSP lmplementation, CA (as recently as 2023): Proiect Geologist. Supported the design and installation of two dozen monitoring wells on small sites.

City of Roseville ASR Program, Placer County, CA (as recently as 2023):

Project Geologist.

Dixon Station No. 4 Replacement, California Water Service Company, Dixon, Solano County, CA (2018): Proiect Geologist. Assisted with the well design on a small site.

East Main #3, Boys Ranch #2A, Jackson #3 Well Pump Station Projects, City of Morgan Hill, San Mateo County, CA (2019): Proiect Geologist.

Assisted with well design.
4ttLScE Charlie Jenkins, PG I Senior Geologist Page 1
Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

SCOTT LEWIS, PG
Senior Principal Geologist, President
#
Years of Experience
25+
Education
BS, Geology, California State
University, Sacramento, CA
Professiona I Registrations
Professiona I Geologist
CA No. 7876
Professiona I Affi I iati ons
r California Groundwater
Resources Association
. CA-NVAWWAWaterWell
Technologies Comm ittee
ASSI6NMENTS
o TechnicalAdvisor:

California Water Well
Standards - Bulletin 74-81
Update (2020-2022).
. Project Manager: New
Municipal Water Well
Projects including well
design, construction and
testing oversight, permitti ng,
and reporting.
. Technical Assistance:

Provides technical assistance
to other firms and drilling
contractors regarding well
design and construction.

Scott has over 25 years of experience in groundwater resources projects, in cluding eva luation of grou ndwater co nd itions, hyd rogeologic assessments, site-specifi c hydrogeologic explorations and evaluations, lithologic and groundwater characterization, monitoring and production well design, construction and testing oversight, development of well rehabilitation and repair programs, oversight of groundwater monitoring programs, and overall project management.

Scott specializes in the investigation, design, construction oversight, testing, and evaluation of monitoring and municipal water wells. He has extensive experience throughout California with groundwater investigations, water supply assessments, site assessments, well evaluations, well abandonments, well modifications, and well reha bilitations.

EXPERIENCE
Acapella Well 21, City of San Bruno, San Mateo County, CA (Ongoing):

Project Manoger.

Well Siting Study and Well 4 Design, City of Watsonville, Santa Cruz County, CA (2021): Project Manoger.

Well No. 8, Town of Discovery Bay, Contra Costa County, CA (2023):

Project Manager.

Well Replacement Projects, San Jose Water, Santa Clara County, CA (as of 2025): Project Manager. Thirty-six new wells (twenty-one since 2012).

Groundwater Storage and Recovery Project, San Francisco public Utilities District, CA (Ongoing): Well Lead.

ASR Program, City of Roseville, CA (as recently as 2023): principol Geologist.

Evaluation of the Palm and Sunrise Wells, Citrus Heights Water District, Sacramento County, CA (2020): project Manoger.

Monitoring Well Project, Solano County Water Agency, CA (as recently as 2023): Project Monager.

Representative Monitoring Well Project, Madera County Department of Water and Natural Resources, CA (Ongoingl project Manager.

Dover Well Pump Station, City of Pittsburg, Contra Costa County, CA (as recently as 2023): Principal Geologist.

Well N10 Walnut Evaluation and Repair, Sacramento Suburban Water District, sacramento county, CA (2020): project Monager.

Station l Well Replacements, California Water Service Company, CA (2019): Principal Geologist.

East Main #3, Boys Ranch #2A, Jackson #3 Well pump Station projects, City of Morgan Hill, CA (2019): Principal Geologist.

Dixon Station No. 4 Replacement Well, California Water Service Company, Solano County, CA (2017): Project Monager.

ArtLscE Scott Lewis, PG I Senior Prirrcipal Geologist, President Page 1 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

JASON COLEMAN, PE
Supervising Engineer
Years of Experience
t7
Education
BS, Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Minor - Atmospheric
Science, University of California
Davis, CA.

Professional Registrations
Professional Engineer
CA No. 78366
Professional Affiliations
r American Society of Civil
Engineers #497L73
. American Water Works
Association #0LL79332
r Groundwater Resources
Agency #4497
. American Council of
Engineering Companies
(ACEC)

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
r Water lnfrastructure
r Treatment Facilities
o Planning
Jason Coleman is a Supervising Engineer with 17 years of experience in water resources planning, groundwater supply development, and potable water infrastructure design. His expertise spans well beyond pump station and treatment facility design, as well as associated construction management and facility regulatory compliance. Jason routinely provides aA/aC oversight on planning documents, technical memoranda, and design/construction deliverables to ensure compliance with State requirements and alignment with client objectives. He has extensive experience coordinating with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water (DDW) related to water supply permitting, UWMPs, RRAs, TMF reports, CEQA documentation, water supply assessments, and more.

EXPERIENCE
District Water Engineer, Town of Discovery Bay, Contra Costa County, CA (2027-20251: District Engineer. Provided engineering design, construction phase services, and technical oversight for TODB's drinking water infrastructure projects since 202L.

Groundwater Storage and Recovery Proiect, San Francisco Public Utillties Commission (SFPUC), San Mateo County, CA (2010-2025):

Project Manager. Well pump designs and construction, and testing oversight for 13 new wells requiring additional coordination with new and upgraded system components, pipelines, storage tanks, and other facilities.

Well Replacement Projects, San Jose Water, Santa Clara County, CA (2008-2025): Well Pump Design [ead. Well pump design and related engineering services for over 20 new and numerous existing wells.

East Main #3, Boys Ranch #2A, Jackson #3 Well Pump Station Projects, City of Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, CA (2015-2019): Project M a n o ge r. I nvesti gation, d es ign, a nd constru ctio n oversight.

Well 4 Pump Station, City of Watsonville, Santa Cruz County, CA (2017-Ongoin gl: Project Manoger. Plans and technical specifications for the well pump station, including a chlorine gas chemical treatment system, a standby diesel generator, a bulk storage materials bunker, and the replacement of approximately 800 feet of ductile iron water main.

River lsland Surface Water Treatment Plant, Del Oro Water Company, Springville, CA (2o2al: Proiect Manager. Led the design of a surface water treatment plant and oversaw construction management.

Chemical Feed Control Project, Diablo Water District, Contra Costa County, CA (201,5-20181: Project Manager. Managed the design of a liquid sodium hypochlorite and aqueous ammonia chemicaltreatment system to increase the concentration of chloramine disinfectant to address residuals dropping below desired levels.

Dover Well Pump Station and On-Call Engineering Support, City of Pittsburg, Contra Costa County, CA (201-8): Proiect Manoger.

AJtLscE Jason Coleman, PE I Supervising Engineer Page 1 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

OSCAR SERRANO, PE
Supervising Engineer
Years of Experience
2O+
Education
MS, Civil & Environmental
Engineering, UC Berkeley, CA
BS, Civil Engineering, California
State U n iversity, Sacramento
Professional Registratio ns
Professional Engineer
lD No. P-21080
CA No,56841
Professional Affiliations
. Groundwater Resources
Association
. American Society of Civil
Engineers

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
r Water lnfrastructure
o Water Resources Planning
o Water Supply Assessments
r Water System Consolidations
. Program Development
r Grant/Funding Assistance
Oscar is a Professional Civil Engineer registered in California with over 20 years of experience, bringing extensive expertise in project management, feasibility studies, water master planning, urban water management plans, and the design of water, wastewater, and stormwater facilities. Specifically, Oscar has designed and provided construction services for pump stations, treatment facilities, water storage tanks, booster stations, and pipeline replacement, among other projects. Additional experience includes developing technical memoranda and reports, grant writing, water rights, water supply permit amendments, and hydraulic modeling,

EXPERIENCE
Oscar is an experienced project manager who has managed the development of engineering plans and technical specifications, as well as engineering services during construction for infrastructure projects.

Well 8 Pump Station, Town of Discovery Bay, Contra Costa County, CA (Ongoing): Engineer Support.

Well 4 Pump Station, City of Watsonville, Santa Cruz County, CA (ongoing): Eng i neer Su pport.

Edgeview Drive and Discovery Bay Boulevard Pipeline Replacement, Town of Discovery Bay, Contra Costa County, CA (2022): project Manager.

Willow Lake Water Treatment Plant Filter 1 Replacement, Town of Discovery Bay, Contra Costa County, CA (2024): Project Manager.

Well 2 Arsenic Treatment System, Rural North Vacaville Water District (RNVWD), Solano County, CA(212al: Project Monoger.

Simplot Well Pump Station, Glenn Springs Holdings/Simplot Lathrop, San Joaquin County, CA (2023): Project Monager.

Water Meter Replacement Project, City of Patterson, Stanislaus County, CA (20221: Project Ma nager.

ASR Wells No. 5 and 6 Facilities, California American Water, Monterey County, CA (2019): Project Engineer.

Water System lmprovements, Colusa lndian Community Council, Colusa County, CA (2020): Project Manager. (Prior firm) Feather Ridge Estates Water System lmprovement, Butte County, Berry Creek, CA (ongoing): Project Manager.

Bethel lsland Pipeline project, Diablo Water District, Contra Costa, CA (2025): P roj e ct M o n o g e r.

Marina/Marlin Crossing Project, Town of Discovery Bay, Contra Costa County, CA (2025): Project Manoger.

Ackerman Bridge Pipeline Replacement, Millview County Water District, Ukiah, CA (ongoing): Project Manager.
4ttLscE Oscar Serrano, PE I Supervising Engineer Page 1 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

TRYSTON CRUZ, EIT, CESSWI
Staff Engineer
H
Years of Experience
8 Education
BS, Civil Engineering, California
State University, Sacramento, CA
Professional Registrations
Engineer-in-Training CA No.
173207
Certified Erosion, Sediment, &
Storm Water lnspector (CESSWI)
No.00006060
Certified Water Auditor
Professional Affi liations
. California Groundwater
Resources Association
Applications & Programing
. AutoCAD/Civil3D
. ArcGlS Pro/Map
. Bently Water/Sewer CAD
. HEC-RAS
. Excel VBA

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
r Water lnfrastructure
r Water System Evaluation
r Water System Consolidations
Tryston's experience includes 3 years of professional and 5 years of sub-professional experience in water resources and environmental engineering. His experience includes international fi eld engineering/ construction, design, mapping, drafting, water quality monitoring, data and project management, leadership, and teaching.

EXPE RI E NCE
Field Engineering Services
Tryston provided construction oversight during pump removal, assessed the pump conditions, and helped provide recommendations to bring the well stations back into optimal performance
Groundwater Storage and Recovery Project, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, CA {Since 20221: Staff Engineer.

General Services, City of Pittsburg, Contra Costa County, CA (Since 2022): Stalf Engineer.

General Services, City of Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, CA (2023):

Staff Engineer.

Water System Consolidation Project, Del Oro Water Company, City of Portervilfe, Stanislaus County, CA (2023): Staff Engineer. Consolidation of two public water systems.

Engineering Plans
Sand Hill Road lrrigation Supply, Stanford University, San Mateo County, CA (Since 2022): Stoff Engineer. Grading, pump station layout, pipeline, roadway alignment, stormwater collection and treatment, and erosion and sediment control plan assistance.

Foothills Solar Community Well & Pump Station Design, Wilshire Ranch, Butte County, cA (202a): Staff Engineer. Assisted with well and pump station plans, including chemical treatment, a backup generator, and a pressure tank.

General Engineering Services, Town of Discovery Bay, Contra Costa County, CA (Since 20221: Staff Engineer. Underwater pipeline crossing plan assistance.

Engineering Support
Water System Evaluation, Madera County Public Works, Madera County, CA (Since 2022|: Staff Engineer. Developed field assessment forms, helped develop a Excel framework to score and rank the water systems, and analyzed each system in ArcGlS.

GIS Utility Mapping Update, City of Patterson, Stanislaus County, CA (2022-2023): Staff Engineer. Assisted with as-built review, updating improvements, and converting the map books from AutoCAD to GlS. 4JtLSCE Tryston Cruz, Efi, CESSWI I Staff Engineer Page 1.

Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

JAMESON GARCIA, EIT
Staff Engineer
rik:,-;
.:tP /l;i -i (ffi ;: *e.:'
i
r:l
d$,- q*
Education
BS, Civil Engineering, California
State University, Sacramento
Professional Registrations
Engineer-ln-Training
CA No. 180691
Professional Affiliations
. Groundwater Resources
Association
Applications & Programing
o AutoCAD/Civil3D
. SewerCAD

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
. Water lnfrastructure
Jameson is a recent Civil Engineering graduate with a concentration in water resources, including the design of water and sewer systems.

As a student, he acquired skills in planning and designing public works infrastructure, including drinking water distribution and sanitary sewer collection systems. He applied knowledge of flow generation, pipe flow hydraulics, regulations, and public health protection to design these systems and explored pump technology and rehabilitation techniques for existing piping systems. He has a comprehensive understanding of soil properties, classifi cation, compactio n, grou ndwater, stresses, compressibility, and shear strength. He has developed proficiency in analytical and experimental procedures for solving geotechnical engineering problems. He possesses strong collaboration skills and the ability to clearly communicate complex technical concepts, adapting effectively to diverse situations.

EXPERIENCE
Well No. 8 Pump Station, Town of Discovery Bay, Contra Costa County, CA: Staff Engineer. Jameson supported submittal and RFI review, ensuring compliance with project specifications. He delivered timely reviews of submittals and revisions to maintain workflow efficiency.

Utilized Civil 3D software to update engineering drawings, addressing all relevant comments and feedback to produce accurate and high-quality plan sets.

Replacement Water Storage Tank Project, Del Oro Water Company, Tulare County, CA: Staff Engineer. Collaborated closely with team members to incorporate feedback and make necessary adjustments.

Updated engineering drawings in Civil 3D, addressing all comments accurately to develop high-quality plans.

Additional Experience
As a Civil Engineer Laboratory Assistant at CSUS, Jameson contributed to the development of work plans and proposals, outlining project details, existing conditions, key issues, and constraints. He facilitated effective communication and collaboration among students. He demonstrated adaptability by responding to experimental needs and ensuring the successful completion of lab exercises. With a strong command of engineering terminology, he effectively communicated technical concepts clearly and concisely.
4ttLSCE JAMESON GARCIA, EIT I Sraff Engineer Page 1
Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

JACQUES DEBRA
Supervising Water Resources Planner
Years of Experience
30+
Education
BA, Environmental Studies,
University of California, Santa
Barbara
Professional Affi liations
. Association of California
Water Agencies {ACWA)
. American Public Works
Association
. American Water Works
Association (AWWA)
. DWR County Drought
Advisory Group
. WateReuse Association
r Sacramento Area Water
Works Association (SAWWA)
. Water Resources Association
(wRA)
. Yolo County Water Committee
(YCWC)

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
. Ordinances and Policies
. Project Management
. Funding Strategy
. Grant lmplementation
. Agency Coordination/
Collaboration
. Outreach
r lnstructor/Speaker
Jacques brings over 30 years of experience in public water utilities management, consulting, and as an AWWA water instructor' He planned and implemented watershed, groundwater, and surface water monitoring programs; conjunctive use projects; prepared groundwater management and integrated water resource planning reports; and developed funding strategies to maximize grant funding for local and regional activities.

As a utility manager and on behalf of consulting clients, Jacques has secured over S+00 million in funding over the last three decades and administered funds for Prop 88, AB 303, Prop 13, Prop 50, Prop 84, Prop 68, Prop 1, WlFlA, and California l-Bank funding programs. He has secured grant funds through every State Proposition funding program since L988, as well as EPA, WlFlA, and other federal funding programs.

EXPE RIE NCE
Prop 13 Grants: Davis Deep Aquifer Studies l/ll 5500,000/$225,000, Meter Retrofit Project S3ll,OOO; City of Rohnert Park Meter Retrofit Project S1.2M
Prop 50 Grants: Yolo County IRWMP planning $984,000
Prop 13 & Prop 50 Grants: Bay Area Regional Conservation Program $5M Prop 84 Grants: Sacramento Westside lntegrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP)implementation SlLM (20L4-L6) and 53M for planning
AB 303 Grants: Yolo County Groundwater Monitoring Program 5450,000; Davis-UC Davis Groundwater Management Plan S110,000; State-wide Residential End Use Study 5784,00; Playfields Artificial Turf Replacement Project 5250,000
Prop 204 Grant: Davis Water Supply Feasibility Study 5500,000 DWR/USACOE Grants: Yolo County Subsidence Monitoring Program S148,ooo
DWSRF Grants: City of Newman Cr6 compliance planning S+gZOOO; Palermo Clean Water Consolidation Project construction 511.7M pending a pproval in 2023
EPA Grant: Pollution Load Reduction Program S1O0,OOO
SWRCB Grant: Pollution Load Reduction Program $1M
Loans: East Davis Water Storage TanklWell 32 S10M, Davis Meter Retrofit Project S:.SlVl Prop 82 Loan, West Davis Water Storage Tank Project $5M low-interest loan.

Proposition 1 IRWM Grant: Palermo Clean Water Consolidation Project (s525,ooo)
DWR Small Community Grant Awards: Berry Creek School Water Project $f .gSlV; Feather Ridge Estates Water lmprovement Project $900,000 SGMA: lnvolved with procurement of over S50M in planning and implementation grants for various GSAs in California'
4ttLscE jacques DeBra I Supervising Water Resources Planner Page 1 Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

J
FnrscH ENcINEERtNG, lNc.

Consulting Electrical Engineers
134O5 Folsom Blvd., Unit 600
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone 916.353.1025
Thomas P. Frisch, P.E.

Experience
Summary
Education
Registration
Mr. Thomas Frisch has worked in the
water/wastewater/power/landfill industries since 1991,
developing skills in power, controls, instrumentation, and communications. He has become very familiar with most
practices and processes used in this industry. His
experience is diverse since he has worked as a Contractor and Consultant in various capacities. As a Contractor, he brought contract drawings to completion by designing
the final details, making submittals, and managing
production. As a Consultant, he has designed over 250
water and wastewater projects ranging from small pump stations to large-scale treatment plants. Consequently, he has a high degree of product knowledge that enables him to minimize design exposure to unproven materials or practices. He understands the challenges that Contractors face in translating plans into construction and knows when to assist on behalf of the Owner. His designs for electrical, instrumentation, and telemetry systems have been very successful with near-zero change orders due to design flaws. His designs include complex PLC motor controls for booster pump stations, lift stations, and motor-operated valves, as well as SCADA telemetry between pump stations and tanks. He has conducted electrical studies, including damage assessments, to determine system capacity and performed cost comparisons to evaluate the electrical operational costs of VFDs versus throttled fixed-speed motors.

B.S. Electrical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 1991 Professional Electrical Engineer Reg. CA EI576L, otherstates as needed Work
Experience
Electrical Engineer (30 years)
Mr. Frisch obtained his Professional Engineering License in 1998 and, shortly thereafter, began working as a consultant in Electrical Design. Thomas has designed over 800 projects ranging from small sewage lift stations to large (2000 HP total medium voltage) pump stations and treatment plants. During this time, Mr. Frisch has become proficient as a designer, obtained the respect of his peers, and now operates a successful Electrical Engineering design and construction services business.

Prior to consulting, Mr. Frisch worked for Tesco Controls as a Field Service Engineer (4 years), Sales Engineer (L year), and Project Engineer (3 years). while working for Tesco, he became very familiar with the design philosophies of HDR, Montgomery watson, Brown and Caldwell, Black & Veatch, Carollo, and others. He engineered and coordinated numerous projects, including full treatment plants in El Dorado Hills, City of Davis, City of Corona, and City of Sanger. He became very familiar with many manufacturers of instrumentation, PLCs, and scADA systems. He developed and defined many of the standards still in use today at Tesco Controls concerning drafting, testing, and manufacturing.

Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

PASE
Timothy E. Elliott, S.E.

Senior Project Manager
Mr. Elliott is a Professional Structural Engineer with
twenty-six years of experience in Structural Engineering analysis, design, and construction, and he has experience in a wide range of projects utilizing various building
materials and systems. He has extensive experience with a variety of finite element and other structural analysis computer programs. Mr. Elliott also has experience in 3-D dynamic response spectrum analysis and design of buildings, bridges, and other structures.

Mr. Elliott has completed hundreds of projects in his twenty-six year career, across many different project types including new buildings and building additions for industrial, commercial, residential and institutional use; water, waste water and storm water facilities (pump station and well facilities, water storage tanks, etc.); vehicular and pedestrian bridges; civil infrastructure facilities (culverts, channels, retaining walls, custom junction structures and manholes, etc.); anchorage of equipment and evaluation/retrofit of existing structures.

Registration California No. C63260 & 54946
Education M.S. Civil Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 1999 B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE,1997 Selected
Experience
Dry Creek & Del Mesa Pump Stations, Monterey County, CA (ln Progress) McCandless Well Facility, Milpitas, CA (ln Progress)
Well 8 Pump Station, Discovery Bay, CA (ln Progress)
Mariposa SDPS, Stockton, CA (ln Progress)
McCarthy Well Pump Station, Gilroy, CA (ln Progress)
South Lakeside Well Pump Station, Counsman, CA (ln Progress) San Pablo Creek Culvert Repair Project, Orinda, CA
San Clemente Pump Station Repairs, Corte Madera, CA
Seismic Evaluation of Steel Water Tanks, Petaluma, CA
Municipal Groundwater Well No. 2, Yuba City, CA
Airpark and Sanchez SDPS, Stockton, CA
North, South, and Recycled Water Pump Stations, Montebello, CA Del Rio Well 70 and Replacement Well229, Modesto, CA
Farmers Lane Wells 4-1 and 4-2 and Emergency Well 7, Santa Rosa, CA Miguelito Pump Station Replacement, San Jose, CA
Grogan Park (Tivoli) Production Well, Modesto, CA
f racy Hills Pump Station, TracY, CA
Anderson Property Steel Water Tank, Rohnert Park, CA
North Tank 11 & Pump Station, Modesto, CA
West Tank 12 & Pump Station, Modesto, CA
Roseville Well Buildings, Roseville, CA
Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

DOKKEN
I!NGINI]!-:RING
Amy Bakker

ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD
Education
2013, BA Environmental Science, California State University, Sacramento
Licenses / Certifi cations
2U7,f /E Branchiopod Recovery Permit
Experience
1 4 years (1 0 w/ Dokken)
Ms. Amy Bakker, a Senior Environmental
Planner with 14 years of experience, is
responsible for assisting with the various
stages of environmental compliance including
environmental construction support,
NEPA/CEQA environmental documents, regulatory
permits, and technical studies. Amy is exceptionally skilled at delivering defensible CEQA documents, conducting biological surveys, and has strong relationships with the regulatory agencies.

She has experience in assisting with Federal and State of California regulatory permitting and compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Amy is skilled in scoping, inventory, and analysis of environmental and biological resources that may be impacted by transportation projects.

As Environmental Lead, Amy will be responsible for managing the environmental services team, developing strategies to
avoid/mini mize environmental impacts, securing CEeA approvals, and delivering environmental tasks on time and within the budget.

Solano lrrigation District Pipelines project Environmental Services On-Call I Solano County
Project Manager I Dokken is currently providing as-needed biological and cultural resources evaluation services to the District for multiple pipeline construction projects atvarious locations throughout Solano County. As Project Manager, Amy is responsible for coordination and oversight of all environmental approval documents including CEQA document approvals, biological and cultural resources records searches, field surveys, and preparation of technical memorandums. To date, Dokken has completed more than 40 water distribution projects for the District.

Sweeney/McCune Creek Outflow Recovery and Automation I
Solano County
Project Manager I This project constructed an eight-foot-tall weir wall and integrated flume meters and automated discharge gates within the Sweeney and McCune creek confluence for recapturing agriculture irrigation water. Solano lrrigation District acted as CEeA lead and Bureau of Reclamation acted as NEpA lead. primary constraints for this project included extensive Native American coordination and monitoring for special status species, such as the western pond turtle. As Project Manager, Amy's primary
responsibilities included the preparation of the environmental technical studies, the CEQA/ NEPA environmental documents, and all regulatory permits, as well as agency coordination, construction monitoring, and complete project oversight. Construction was completed in November of 2017.

Quail Canyon lmprovement District Replacement Well and
Pipeline I Solano County
Project Manager I This project will construct a new well and conveyance pipeline in unincorporated Solano County. The new well is necessary to reduce drought impacts of a failing well and increase fire resiliency within the service area. The project consists of installing and equipping a new 300-foot-deep groundwater well and an approximately 2,600 LF of 10 or 12-inch diameter conveyance pipeline to deliver water from the new well to the existing system. Amy's primary responsibilities included oversight of preparation ofthe environmental technical studies, CEeA/ NEpA environmental document, agency liaison, and complete project oversight. The project is anticipated to start construction in the fall of 2025.

Pleasant Hills Ranch Estates Drinking Water Treatment plant I
Solano County
Environmental Lead I This project.constructed a water
purification plant to bring the Pleasant Hills Ranch Estates (pHRE) subdivision into compliance with the Federal and State Safe Drinking Water Act requirements. A transmission line runs 2000 feet along existing roadways to an existing pumping plant that operates a 175 gallon per minute membrane filtration with post chlorination and has 40,000 gallons of storage available. Amy,s primary responsibilities included the preparation of the Supplemental lnitial Study leading to a tvlitigation Negative Declaration, agency coordination, public outreach, and general project management. The treatment plant was constructed in 201 g.

On-Call Environmental Services I Santa Cruz County
Task Order Manager I Heavy rains and saturated soils during the winter of 2017 caused multiple storm damage related issues throughout Santa Cruz County requiring emergency repairs for roadways, embankments, and culverts. Dokken provided design and environmental services for'1 5 of these locations, all of which included both FHWA and FEMA funding. Amy's responsibilities included project management, QA/QC, FEMA liaison, Caltrans liaison, and preparing the regulatory permits.

Additional Relevant Experience
. On-Call Environmental Services I Solano County I
Environmental Lead
. Well 12 Water Treatment plan I Solano County I
Environmental Lead
. La Sierra Aquifer Storage and Recovery Well I Carmichael Water District I Environmental Lead
D€P.g{,s,P.ry
Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

I*AND
632 PETALUMA AVENUE, SEBASTOPOL, CALIFORNIA 95472 I (707)829-0400 / FAX (707)829-O4Or Joseph L Hughes
Gatifornia Professional Land Surveyor - License No. PLS 8992 Education 1997-1999 SRJC Civil Surveying Technology Program Santa Rosa, CA 1993-1997 El Molino High School Forestville, CA
Work experience 1998 - 1998 CARLILE-MACY Santa Rosa, CA Chain-Man
. I worked as a Chain-man on a two-man crew for the summer months. 1999 - Current Phelps & Associates, lnc. Sebastopol, CA Project Manager, Party Chief, lnstrument Man, GPS Manager, AutoCAD Manager
' I have worked as the Project Manager and Party Chief for many years. I am highly versed with the methodology and background of GPS. I have construction staked, performed boundary / topographic mapping / ALTA / aerial mapping / and elevation certificate surveys. I have also put numerous hours on a CAD station drafting Record of Survey Maps, Topo Maps, ParcelMaps, ALTA's, etc.
2013 - Licensed as a Professional Land Surveyor
Summary of
qualifications
At Phelps & Associates I'm involved in every aspect of Surveying. When out in the field I run the crew and coordinate the survey. When in the office, I manage jobs from proposal to completion making sure they are done correctly and completed on time. I've seen and participated in several other events related to surveying .ln 2013 I became licensed as a Professional Land Surveyor in the State of California and am a member of the California Land Surveyors Association.

I have had three semesters of the SRJC's Civil Surveying Technology program. The SRJC's program contains surveying skills, AutoCAD experience, roadway design, map drafting, curves vertical and horizontal, solars, staking, level loops, state plane coordinates, traversing, legal description writing, subdivision planning, and boundary surveying.

Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

City Council
MayorJill McLewis
Vice Mayor Sandra Maurer
Councilmember Phill Carler
Councilmember Neysa Hinton
Councilmember Stephen Zollman
lnterim City Manager
MarY GourleY
m gourlev@ CitvofsebastoPol.gov
Gity of Sebastopol

AGENDA REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING OF
WEDN ESDAY -March 18, 2026
1:00 pm
AGENDA
ln Person Location:

Please Note Location Change Sebastopol Citv Hall, 7120 Bodeea Avenue . Sebastoool cA 95472 Callto Order
RollCall
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The City of Sebastopol acknowledges that we live and work within the unceded ancestral homelands of the Southern Pomo and the Coast Miwok people. We pay our respect to the past, present, and future generations of these peoples, including the Federated lndians of Graton Rancheria.

L. Discussion of Upcoming City Council Agendas/Forward Calendars Adjournment
American Disa bilitv Act modations/Accessibilitv: A request can be made orally or in writing, and submitted to the ADA Coordinator by email: [email protected] or to the City Clerk's Office so as to avoid delay in reviewing and processing the request. Requests can be made by contacting the ADA Coordinator's Office at (707) 823-8597, via email at [email protected] or by mailing such a request to the ADA Coordinator's Office located at7425 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, CA. Note that if you contact the ADA Coordinators Office, via mail, you need to make the request early enough that a response can be timely provided
Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026

Agenda Item Number 3
Agenda Item Number 3
City Council Meeting Packet for March 17, 2026