Cities Index.
Lee-Mathias-Sebastopol-Commons-Public-Comment_Redacted

Sebastopol City Council
September 1, 2026

Document
Lee-Mathias-Sebastopol-Commons-Public-Comment_Redacted
Meeting
September 1, 2026
Body
Sebastopol City Council
Original file
189 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.cityofsebastopol.gov. That file is the official record.

From: City Council
To: Mary Gourley
Cc: Oriana Hart; Erik Billing; Torran Korman; Ana Kwong Subject: FW: Public Comment: Sebastopol Commons may hurt downtown economy badly Date: Monday, August 31, 2026 11:46:58 PM
Attachments: PC Sebastopol Commons may hurt downtown economy badly.pdf Please see public comment
BCC: Email BCC to City Council, City Attorney
City staff that received this email are listed in the CC distribution line as noted above.

City Staff: Please Post to City Website
Thank you
Mary Gourley
City Manager
For your security, all official communications from the City of Sebastopol will only originate from email addresses ending in “@cityofsebastopol.gov”. City staff do not use personal email accounts or any variation of the City’s domain for official correspondence.

Messages sent from any other email domain should not be considered legitimate.

From: Lee Mathias >
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2026 10:43 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Subject: Public Comment: Sebastopol Commons may hurt downtown economy badly Attached public comment for the Sebastopol Commons agenda item on September 1.

Lee
What are the Economic Effects of moving the Library?
The Sebastopol Commons project should be evaluated based on the stated goals of the project taken from their own project documents -
The project is intended to be:
“a centralized hub that blends civic economic, cultural and social resources to foster engagement and economic vitality.”
“located in historic downtown Sebastopol”
“a catalyst for economic development in the downtown corridor.” The Commons committee made a strong argument that the library contributes to the economic vitality of downtown. What is the economic impact of moving it to the O’Reilly building at the northern end of town.

Estimates from various reports on library usage suggest 160,000-200,000+ annual visits.

This makes the library a significant downtown traffic generator. The library appears to be the number 2 attraction behind the Barlow which claims 935,400 visits. So, the library creates up to 1/5 the foot traffic reported for the entire Barlow. What is the economic effect?
Without an economic study, we can only do a sensitivity analysis.

Assume 33% of visits include taking advantage of the visit to town to buy groceries, grab coffee, eat in a restaurant or visit an art gallery or a retail shop. 162,000 x33%= about 53,500 secondary downtown visits/year Average Spending Annual Downtown Revenue
$10 $535,000
$15 $803,000
$20 $1.07 million
$30 $1.61 million
The city has struggled to revive the growth in sales tax revenue since COVID. Moving the library appears to contradict the stated goal of making a new library “a catalyst for economic development in the downtown corridor”. It may in fact have the opposite effect, lowering downtown visitors and driving down economic activity.

← All documents from this meeting