Agenda Item Number 10
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM REPORT FOR MEETING OF: September 15, 2026
=========================================================================================== To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
From: Oriana Hart, Public Works Director
Department: Public Works
Subject: Citywide Pavement Management and Multi-Year Paving Strategy =========================================================================================== RECOMMENDATIONS:
That the City Council approve the proposed multi-year paving strategy and direct staff to proceed with the FY 2026-27 reconstruction of Eastside Avenue and South Avenue, begin design and project preparation for the FY 2027-28 overlay projects on Palm Avenue, Maytum Avenue, and Wallace Street, and continue the PMP-based slurry seal program, subject to available funding and final project development.
PROCESS OF AGENDA ITEM:
• Presentation of Agenda item by the Requestor or Responsible Department • Questions and Discussion from Councilmembers
• Public Comment Period
• Presentation Received
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of this item is to present the City Council a pavement prioritization recommendation incorporating the City’s existing Pavement Management Plan (PMP) with a ranking system for prioritizing streets in very poor condition for repair. The City's PMP provides a comprehensive, data-driven approach for evaluating pavement conditions and identifying the most cost-effective treatments for maintaining the City's roadway network. It is an important tool for ensuring that pavement dollars are invested strategically and that streets are preserved before they deteriorate to the point where substantially more expensive rehabilitation or reconstruction is required. At the same time, the City has a number of streets that are already in very poor condition and were not candidates for the Digouts and Repairs project.
Some of these streets do not rise to the top of a traditional PMP because reconstruction is significantly more expensive than preservation treatments on streets that are still in better condition.
Staff has therefore developed a prioritization approach that uses the PMP data but also considers factors important to Sebastopol, including existing pavement condition, traffic, transportation and bicycle networks, proximity to schools, and coordination with underground infrastructure needs.
BACKGROUND:
The City maintains approximately 23.8 centerline miles of paved streets. The City's current PMP was prepared through the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's Pavement Technical Assistance Program. The Citywide pavement inspection was completed in October 2024, and the resulting analysis established an average network Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 55, which falls within the "Fair" condition category. PCI is a numerical measure from 0 to 100 used to describe pavement condition. Higher numbers indicate better pavement conditions. A newly constructed roadway would generally have a PCI near 100, while a roadway that has failed and requires major reconstruction would have a substantially lower PCI.
The City's network is currently divided among several pavement condition categories:
• Approximately 41 percent of the network is in Good condition; • Approximately 19 percent is in Fair condition;
• Approximately 22 percent is in Poor condition; and
• Approximately 19 percent is in Very Poor condition.
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number 10
This means that approximately 40 percent of the City's pavement network is already in Poor or Very Poor condition.
The PMP identifies a significant funding gap between the City's available pavement funding and the amount necessary to address the City's overall pavement needs. The PMP estimates approximately $20.8 million in maintenance and rehabilitation needs over the period evaluated, while the City's planned funding is substantially less. The PMP therefore demonstrates a fundamental challenge facing the City: there is not enough funding to address every roadway that needs work, and the City must make choices about which streets to repair and when.
DISCUSSION:
The City's Pavement Management Plan is based on the principle that it is generally more cost-effective to preserve a roadway while it is still in relatively good condition than to allow it to deteriorate to the point where major rehabilitation or reconstruction is required. Streets in Good condition may be candidates for relatively low-cost treatments such as slurry seals, crack sealing, and other preventive maintenance. As pavement condition declines, treatments become more extensive and expensive. Streets in Fair condition may require microsurfacing or an asphalt overlay, while streets in Poor or Very Poor condition may require more substantial rehabilitation or reconstruction.
The PMP generally favors treating streets before they become the City's worst streets. This approach is important to managing the pavement network as a whole because allowing streets that are currently in relatively good or fair condition to deteriorate can ultimately result in significantly higher costs to the City. At the same time, the City's pavement needs substantially exceed available funding, requiring the City to prioritize investments among competing needs.
For the current paving discussion, staff used the Pavement Management Plan (PMP) as the foundation for a supplemental prioritization analysis. The analysis evaluates each street based on pavement condition, proposed treatment, estimated treatment cost, cost-effectiveness, Safe Routes to School and Active Transportation considerations, major roadway function, bicycle network connections, number of parcels served, and sewer priorities.
Pavement condition remains the primary consideration, with staff evaluating the existing PCI, anticipated treatment, and estimated cost for each street. The supplemental analysis was intended to provide a systematic, data driven approach for determining which of the City’s very poor condition streets should be prioritized for reconstruction in the coming years. This approach allows the City to make these decisions consistently and equitably, considering both the condition of each street and the broader benefits to residents and the transportation network.
The supplemental analysis also recognizes that PCI alone does not capture the full community value of a roadway. Safe Routes to School and Active Transportation considerations identify streets that provide important connections for students, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Major roadway function and bicycle network connections recognize streets that serve broader transportation needs. Sewer and water priorities are included to help coordinate pavement improvements with underground infrastructure work and avoid making a significant pavement investment on a street that may soon require excavation for sewer and water improvements.
These factors are incorporated into a multiplier that provides additional priority to streets with greater community or infrastructure considerations. The resulting PCI Equity Score allows staff to maintain pavement condition as the primary consideration while also recognizing factors that are not captured by PCI alone. A lower PCI Equity Score represents a higher overall priority for reconstruction among the City’s poor-condition streets. Applying this methodology provides a more complete picture of the City’s paving needs than relying on PCI alone. Based on the current analysis, Eastside Avenue and South Avenue are identified as the highest priorities for major reconstruction.
Both streets have very low PCI ratings and have reached a condition where reconstruction is warranted.
The next tier of projects identified through the analysis includes Palm Avenue, Maytum Avenue, and Wallace Street, which are proposed for asphalt overlay in FY 2027-28. These streets have poor pavement conditions however initial assessments indicate that they likely have the pavement structural section intake and are likely candidates for overlay Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number 10
rather than reconstruction. If approved, staff will work with our pavement engineers to complete a full geotechnical analysis as part of the design.
At the same time, the City would continue implementing the preservation strategy recommended through the PMP through a broader slurry seal program, focusing on the streets identified for preservation in the City’s current Pavement Management Plan. Staff proposes considering the following streets for PMP-based preservation work:
Hermosa Court, Dowd Drive, Fannen Avenue, Giusti Court, Shaun Court, Murphy Avenue, Florence Avenue, Lynch Road, Jewell Avenue, Pitt Avenue, Burnett Street, Hayden Avenue, High Street, Fircrest Avenue, Acorn Court, Covert Lane, and Pleasant Hill Avenue North.
Table 1 – Proposed Multi-Year Paving Program
Fiscal Year Work Construction Design Construction
Management Estimated Total
FY 2026-27 Eastside Ave – Reconstruction $263,000 $26,000 $26,000 $315,000 FY 2026-27 South Ave – Reconstruction $235,000 $24,000 $24,000 $282,000 FY 2026-27 Design – FY 2027-28 Projects — $100,000 — $100,000 FY 2026-27 Total $498,000 $150,000 $50,000 $697,000
FY 2027-28 Palm Ave – Overlay $104,000 — $10,000 $114,000 FY 2027-28 Maytum Ave – Overlay $285,000 — $28,000 $313,000 FY 2027-28 Wallace St – Overlay $275,000 — $28,000 $303,000 FY 2027-28 PMP Slurry Seal Program $335,000 — $34,000 $369,000 FY 2027-28 Total $999,000 — $100,000 $1,099,000
*Note Digouts and Repairs (CIP 0520-22.09) was completed in August. Strout St Reconstruction Part of (CIP 0521-
25.05) will be completed in Spring. Total Approved Pavement Project CIP Budget for CY26/27 $1.4 Mil.
Table 2 – Adopted FY26/27 CIP Budget
Funding Source Amount
FY 2026-27 Citywide Pavement Improvements CIP – Project 26.01 $612,800 FY 2025-26 Citywide Pavement Improvements CIP – Project 25.05 $100,000 Total Available for Proposed Citywide Paving $712,800
Table 3 – Preliminary FY27/28 Citywide Pavement Improvement Project Funding Funding Source Amount
Measure U (100) $600,000
Go Sonoma $150,000
SB1 $150,000
Gas Tax $200,000
Total FY27/28 Pavement Funding $1,100,000
This approach allows the City to address the most deteriorated streets in the initial year while continuing to invest in the preservation of streets that are not yet in need of major reconstruction. By approving the multi-year strategy now, staff can begin the design and pre-bid work for the FY 2027-28 projects concurrently with the FY 2026-27 projects. This Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number 10
will allow the City to move efficiently toward bidding and awarding the next paving program at the beginning of the fiscal year. Paving projects are typically constructed between March and October, when temperatures are generally above 50°F and weather conditions are typically drier. Because paving projects can require approximately four to six months for design, preparation, and bidding, initiating the process during the summer allows the City to complete construction during the following paving season rather than waiting an additional year. Staff therefore proposes completing the design and pre-bid work during the current fiscal year, positioning the proposed FY 2027-28 paving projects for construction beginning July 1, 2027, following approval of the FY 2027-28 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and budget.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Staff agrees with the fundamental premise of the PMP: it is more cost effective to preserve a street before it deteriorates than to reconstruct it after it fails. The City should continue to invest in preservation treatments and should not allow currently serviceable streets to deteriorate unnecessarily.
However, the City's current pavement network also includes streets that have already reached a condition where significant rehabilitation or reconstruction is necessary. Staff does not believe it is appropriate to continue deferring those streets indefinitely, simply because preservation of other streets may produce a greater increase in the City's overall PCI. The supplemental analysis provides a way to consider those streets using more than PCI alone. It incorporates roadway condition, anticipated treatment, cost effectiveness, traffic, transportation and bicycle network considerations, proximity to community-serving facilities, and coordination with sewer infrastructure.
The result is a more locally focused approach that still relies heavily on the City's existing PMP data. Staff's recommendation is therefore to address the City's most significant pavement deficiencies first and then transition toward a greater emphasis on preservation projects identified through the PMP. This approach also provides flexibility.
The City can continue to evaluate the next group of projects as pavement and geotechnical information becomes available rather than committing today to a fixed list of projects several years into the future.
The 2027 citywide PCI assessment will provide a natural opportunity to reassess the entire street network and incorporate additional local priorities into the City’s next comprehensive pavement management planning process.
The City is slated to receive funding from MTC in 2027 for a new pavement condition assessment and development of an updated Pavement Management Plan (PMP). The resulting PMP is anticipated to be available in 2028 and will provide updated recommendations to guide future paving projects beyond the current planning period.
CITY COUNCIL GOALS/PRIORITIES/AND OR GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY:
This agenda item represents the City Council goals/priorities as follows:
• Goal 3 – Infrastructure. Maintaining high quality infrastructure, facilities and services includes repairing/ replacing outdated city facilities, improving streets, stormwater and wastewater infrastructure.
This agenda item represents the City Council General Plan Consistency (if applicable):
• Circulation CIR 1-11: Provide high quality regular maintenance for existing and future transportation facilities including streets, sidewalk, and paths.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
This agenda item has been noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and was available for public viewing and review at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting date.
COMMUNITY OUTREACH:
This item has been noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and was available for public viewing and review at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting date. As of the writing of this staff report, the City has not received any public comment on this item. However, if staff receives public comment from interested parties following the publication and distribution of this staff report, such comments will be provided to the City Council as supplemental Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number 10
materials before or at the meeting. In addition, public comments may be offered during the public comment portion of this item.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City's current Pavement Management Plan identifies approximately $20.8 million in pavement maintenance and rehabilitation needs over the period evaluated by the PMP. The City's planned pavement funding is substantially less than this amount, requiring the City to prioritize which streets are addressed and when. For FY 2026-27, the adopted CIP includes $612,800 for the Citywide Pavement Repairs and Repaving Program, funded through Measure U. This funding is intended to support pavement treatments and improvements throughout the City.
RESTATED RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the proposed multi-year paving strategy and direct staff to proceed with the FY 2026-27 reconstruction of Eastside Avenue and South Avenue, begin design and project preparation for the FY 2027-28 overlay projects on Palm Avenue, Maytum Avenue, and Wallace Street, and continue the PMP-based slurry seal program, subject to available funding and final project development.
CITY COUNCIL OPTION(S):
1. Option 1 – Approve the proposed multi-year paving strategy: Direct staff to proceed with the proposed approach of prioritizing the City's most deteriorated streets for major rehabilitation or reconstruction in the first year, including Eastside Avenue and South Avenue, and transitioning in the second year toward pavement preservation and rehabilitation projects identified through the City's Pavement Management Plan.
2. Option 2 – Approve the strategy with modifications: Provide direction to staff regarding changes to the proposed prioritization criteria, funding levels, or individual streets to be included in the first- and secondyear paving programs, and direct staff to return with a revised multi-year paving strategy.
3. Option 3 – Follow the current Pavement Management Plan priorities: Direct staff to implement the treatment priorities identified in the City's current Pavement Management Plan, focusing available funding on the most cost-effective combination of pavement preservation, rehabilitation, and reconstruction (Attachment 3)
4. Option 4 – Defer the decision: Direct staff to complete additional pavement, geotechnical, and infrastructure analysis and return to Council with a revised multi-year paving strategy.
ATTACHMENT(S):
1 – Multi Year Paving Priority Map & List
2 – Paving Priority Presentation
3 – PMP Map & List
APPROVALS:
Department Head Approval: Approval Date: 9/2/26
CEQA Determination (Planning): Approval Date: 9/8/26
Administrative Services (Financial) Approval Date: 9/8/26 Costs authorized in City Approved Budget: Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A Account Code (If applicable) Funds
City Attorney Approval: Approval Date: 9/8/26
City Manager Approval: Approval Date: 9/8/26
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Attachment 1
Agenda Item Number 10 Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Citywide Pavement Improvement Project - 3yr Plan Legend City Limits
Rail Road
Lake
River and Creek
Subsurface
Surface or Unknown
Major (4801-9600)
Private (4801-9600)
Public Schools
Adult
High
Alternative
Middle
Elementary
Parcels
- FY 26/27
- FY 27/28
- FY 28/29
1: 9,600
Notes
0.3 0 0.15 0.3Miles This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable.
NAD_1983_StatePlane_California_II_FIPS_0402_Feet THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION
CITYWIDE PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
RANKINGS AND PROPOSED STREETS
Attachment 1
Agenda Item Number 10
Street PCI Code Treatment Area (SF) FY Cost ($) School Major Rd Bike Sewer
Priority
Equity
Mult.
PCI Equ
Rank
Worst-PCI
First Rank
PCI Equity
Score
SOUTH AVENUE 5 RC Reconstruct 5600 FY27 $ 235,200.00 100 50 0 0 1.26 1 2.0 3.98 EASTSIDE AVENUE 6 RC Reconstruct 6250 FY27 $ 262,500.00 100 50 0 0 1.26 2 3.0 4.76 MAYTUM AVENUE 9 Ol Overlay 16700 FY28 $ 283,900.00 100 50 0 100 1.28 3 4.0 7.02 PALM AVENUE 9 OL Overlay 6100 FY28 $ 103,700.00 50 100 0 100 1.21 4 5.0 7.44 WALLACE STREET 12 OL Overlay 16000 FY28 $ 272,000.00 0 50 100 0 1.18 6 8.0 10.21 MURPHY AVENUE 65 SL Slurry Seal 14630 FY28 $ 14,630.00 0 50 100 100 1.16 107 114.0 56.03 COVERT LANE 79 SL Slurry Seal 46920 FY28 $ 46,920.00 100 50 100 0 1.35 114 176.0 58.52 PLEASANT HILL AVENUE NORTH - 83 SL Slurry Seal 53280 FY28 $ 53,280.00 100 50 100 100 1.36 124 203.0 61.03 JEWELL AVENUE 71 SL Slurry Seal 31200 FY28 $ 31,200.00 0 50 100 0 1.15 126 131.0 LYNCH ROAD 71 SL Slurry Seal 4250 FY28 $ 4,250.00 0 50 100 0 1.15 126 132.0 HERMOSA CT 62 SL Slurry Seal 6890 FY28 $ 6,890.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 128 107.0 62.00 BURNETT STREET 74 SL Slurry Seal 9920 FY28 $ 9,920.00 0 50 100 0 1.15 137 145.0 64.35 HAYDEN AVENUE 74 SL Slurry Seal 18080 FY28 $ 18,080.00 0 50 100 0 1.15 137 146.0 64.35 DOWD DRIVE 65 SL Slurry Seal 22400 FY28 $ 22,400.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 139 115.0 65.00 HIGH STREET 75 SL Slurry Seal 6020 FY28 $ 6,020.00 0 50 100 0 1.15 140 152.0 65.22 HIGH STREET 75 SL Slurry Seal 12090 FY28 $ 12,090.00 0 50 100 0 1.15 140 153.0 65.22 LYNCH ROAD 75 SL Slurry Seal 6860 FY28 $ 6,860.00 0 50 100 0 1.15 140 154.0 65.22 LYNCH ROAD 75 SL Slurry Seal 6860 FY28 $ 6,860.00 0 50 100 0 1.15 140 155.0 65.22 FLORENCE AVENUE 69 SL Slurry Seal 7000 FY28 $ 7,000.00 0 50 0 0 1.05 146 127.0 65.71 FANNEN AVENUE 67 SL Slurry Seal 7500 FY28 $ 7,500.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 150 121.0 67.00 ACORN COURT 81 SL Slurry Seal 3770 FY28 $ 3,770.00 100 0 0 0 1.20 152 189.0 67.50 GIUSTI COURT 68 SL Slurry Seal 5850 FY28 $ 5,850.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 155 125.0 68.00 SHAUN COURT 71 SL Slurry Seal 9100 FY28 $ 9,100.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 162 133.0 71.00 FIRCREST AVENUE 78 SL Slurry Seal 15065 FY28 $ 15,065.00 0 50 0 0 1.05 176 168.0 74.29 PITT AVENUE 78 SL Slurry Seal 10240 FY28 $ 10,240.00 0 50 0 0 1.05 176 169.0 74.29 FIRCREST AVENUE 79 SL Slurry Seal 7410 FY28 $ 7,410.00 0 50 0 0 1.05 181 177.0 75.24 PITT AVENUE 78 SL Slurry Seal 15810 FY28 $ 15,810.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 188 170.0 78.00 WILLOW STREET 9 RC Reconstruct 10640 FY29 $ 446,880.00 0 50 100 100 1.18 5 6.0 7.64 BROOKHAVEN COURT 14 OL Overlay 15328 FY29 $ 260,576.00 100 50 0 0 1.28 7 10.0 10.92 MCFARLANE AVENUE 72 SL Slurry Seal 15312 FY29 $ 15,312.00 100 50 100 0 1.35 100 135.0 53.33 MURPHY AVENUE 73 SL Slurry Seal 16720 FY29 $ 16,720.00 100 50 0 0 1.25 113 141.0 58.40 VALENTINE AVENUE 80 SL Slurry Seal 51588 FY29 $ 51,588.00 100 50 100 0 1.35 118 181.0 59.26 MCFARLANE AVENUE 82 SL Slurry Seal 7924 FY29 $ 7,924.00 100 50 100 100 1.36 120 194.0 60.29 VALENTINE AVENUE 82 SL Slurry Seal 24310 FY29 $ 24,310.00 100 50 100 100 1.36 120 195.0 60.29 NORTH MAIN STREET 87 SL Slurry Seal 5550 FY29 $ 5,550.00 100 100 100 0 1.40 129 212.0 62.14 LAGUNA PARK WAY 73 SL Slurry Seal 18000 FY29 $ 18,000.00 0 50 100 0 1.15 133 142.0 63.48 CALDER AVENUE 74 SL Slurry Seal 7400 FY29 $ 7,400.00 0 50 0 0 1.05 160 147.0 70.48 FLORENCE AVENUE 74 SL Slurry Seal 13390 FY29 $ 13,390.00 0 50 0 0 1.05 160 148.0 70.48 LYNCH ROAD 82 SL Slurry Seal 7560 FY29 $ 7,560.00 0 50 100 0 1.15 163 196.0 71.30 FIRST STREET 72 SL Slurry Seal 37315 FY29 $ 37,315.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 164 136.0 72.00
61.74 61.74
-
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Citywide Pavement
Management and
Multi -Year Paving Strategy
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting • September 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
02 Agenda Item Number 10
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY
Decision Requested
1 Approve the proposed multi -year paving strategy
2 3
4 Proceed with FY 2026–27 reconstruction: Eastside + South Begin FY 2027–28 overlay design: Palm + Maytum + Wallace + Slurry Seal Design Continue with Multi-year strategy until next Pavement Management Cycle in 2027/28 Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
03 Agenda Item Number 10
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY
Why pavement decisions are needed now
23.8 miles maintained
55 average PCI • Fair
40%
Poor / Very Poor
$20.8M
total need
Delay converts affordable preservation into expensive
reconstruction.
The strategy balances immediate reconstruction needs with continued investment in streets that can still be preserved.
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY
What is a Pavement Management Program?
04 Agenda Item Number 10
Understanding the PCI Pavement Score:
A score from 0 to 100 that rates pavement condition based on observed surface distress.
Derived from systematic inspections of cracking, rutting, patches, and other defects.
Translates pavement health into a clear number to guide maintenance and budgeting decisions.
0-40
POOR
Failed pavement
41-70
FAIR
Fair condition
71-100
GOOD
Excellent condition
0 100
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY
The challenge: which streets to fix first?
06 Agenda Item Number 10
PMP lens
Prioritizes PCI, cost-effectiveness and
preservation value. This protects the
most lane-miles per dollar.
Question
Which very poor streets carry enough
community value and infrastructure
need to warrant earlier
reconstruction?
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
07 Agenda Item Number 10
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY
Prioritization Criteria & Scoring Method
Pavement condition
Safe Routes / activetravel Major roadway function Bike network connection Parcels served Schools + facilities Water / sewer
coordination
IMPACT MULTIPLIER → PCI IMPACT SCORE>
Lower score = higher reconstruction priority
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
IMPACT MULTIPLIE → PCI EQUITY SCORE
07 Agenda Item Number 10
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY
Scoring Method Results
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY
Proposed FY 2026 –27 Program
09 Agenda Item Number 10
PROJECT
Eastside Avenue
CONSTRUCTION DESIGN
$263k $26k
CM
$26k
TOTAL
$315k
South Avenue $235k $24k $24k $282k
FY 27–28 design / pre-bid — $100k — $100k
TOTAL $498k $150k $50k $697k
$697,000 total estimated budget
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
10 Agenda Item Number 10
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY
Proposed FY 2027 –28 Program
Palm overlay $114k
Maytum overlay $313k
Wallace overlay $303k
PMP slurry seal $369k
$1.099M
FY 2027–28 estimated total
DESIGN FUNDING REQUEST
$100,000 in FY 26 –27
Keeps design, bidding and the
seasonal paving window on
schedule.
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
13 Agenda Item Number 10
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY
PMP -based Preservation Recommendations
HermosaCt Dowd Dr FannenAve Giusti Ct
Shaun Ct Murphy Ave Florence Ave Lynch Rd
Jewell Ave Pitt Ave Burnett St Hayden Ave
High St Fircrest Ave Acorn Ct Covert Ln
Pleasant Hill Ave N
Preservation pipeline is subject to final project development and funding availability.
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
BY FISCAL YEAR AND TREATMENT
FY 2026-27 Reconstruction
FY 2027-28 Reconstruction / Overlay
FY 2028-28 Surface Treatment
FY 2029-29 Reconstruction / Overlay
FY 2028-29 Surface Treatment
Citywide Pavement Improvement Project - 3yr Plan
Agenda Item Number 10 Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY 12
Agenda Item Number 10
Why the PMP Matters — and where it stops
WHAT IT DOES WELL
Protects network value
Maximizes life extension per dollar
Supports consistent decisions
Makes the funding gap visible
LIMITATION
Cost-effectiveness naturally favors
preservation. Very poor streets can rank
lower, even when local access, safety or
infrastructure coordination argues for
earlier action.
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
14 Agenda Item Number 10
CITY OF SEBASTOPOL • PAVEMENT STRATEGY
One Strategy, two complementary lenses
PMP FOUNDATION
Condition • cost • life
extension
LOCAL PRIORITIES
Safety • access •
coordination
MULTI-YEAR PROGRAM
Transparent • timely •
balanced
The PMP remains the network -management foundation. The PCI Impact Score adds community value and infrastructure coordination, bringing urgent, high -value streets forward without abandoning preservation discipline.
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
Approve the strategy.
Advance the next paving window.
Agenda Item Number 10
01 Approve FY 2026–27 Pavement Improvement Projects
02 Approve $100k design funding for FY 2027 –28 Questions & discussion 03 Approve FY 2027-28 Pavement Improvement Projects
04 Update PCI in 2027 and PMP by 2028
05 Continue preservation, funding pursuit + engagement
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
&LW\ RI 6HEDVWRSRO 6FHQDULR 7UHDWPHQWV
&XUUHQW )XQGLQJ $OO 3URMHFW 3HULRGV 3ULQWHG
Attachment 3
Agenda Item Number 10 Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Attachment 3
Agenda Item Number 10 Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Treatment
Agenda Item Number 10 Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Treatment
Treatment
Agenda Item Number 10 Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Treatment
Treatment
Agenda Item Number 10 Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Treatment
Agenda Item Number 10 Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Treatment
Treatment
Agenda Item Number 10 Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026
Treatment
Agenda Item Number 10
Treatment
Agenda Item Number 10
City Council Meeting Packet for September 15, 2026