Selma City Council
June 20, 2022

Council Packet 291
Exhibit B
Position Frequency A B C D E
Non-Safety Paramedic (24) Monthly 2,942.00 3,089.00 3,243.00 3,405.00 3,575.00 Biweekly 1,357.85 1,425.69 1,496.77 1,571.54 1,650.00
Hourly 16.97 17.82 18.71 19.64 20.63
Non-Safety EMT (24) Monthly 2,678.00 2,812.00 2,953.00 3,101.00 3,256.00 Biweekly 1,236.00 1,297.85 1,362.92 1,431.23 1,502.77
Hourly 15.45 16.22 17.04 17.89 18.78
Non-Safety Paramedic (12) Monthly 3,512.00 3,688.00 3,872.00 4,066.00 4,269.00 Biweekly 1,620.92 1,702.15 1,787.08 1,876.62 1,970.31
Hourly 20.26 21.28 22.34 23.46 24.63
Non-Safety EMT (12) Monthly 2,678.00 2,812.00 2,953.00 3,101.00 3,256.00 Biweekly 1,236.00 1,297.85 1,362.92 1,431.23 1,502.77
Hourly 15.45 16.22 17.04 17.89 18.78
Position Frequency A B C D E
Fire Captain Monthly 6,033.00 6,335.00 6,652.00 6,985.00 7,334.00 Biweekly 2,784.46 2,923.85 3,070.15 3,223.85 3,384.92
Hourly * 24.86 26.11 27.41 28.78 30.22
(* 56 hours per week)
Fire Division Chief (FLSA Exempt) Monthly 7,681.00 8,065.00 8,468.00 8,891.00 9,336.00 Biweekly 3,545.08 3,722.31 3,908.31 4,103.54 4,308.92
Hourly 44.31 46.53 48.85 51.29 53.86
Fire Marshal Monthly 6,033.00 6,335.00 6,652.00 6,985.00 7,334.00 Biweekly 2,784.46 2,923.85 3,070.15 3,223.85 3,384.92
Hourly 34.81 36.55 38.38 40.30 42.31
Position Frequency A B C D E
Accountant Monthly 4,963.00 5,211.00 5,472.00 5,746.00 6,033.00 Biweekly 2,290.62 2,405.08 2,525.54 2,652.00 2,784.46
Hourly 28.63 30.06 31.57 33.15 34.81
Accounting Technician Monthly 4,160.00 4,368.00 4,586.00 4,815.00 5,056.00 Biweekly 1,920.00 2,016.00 2,116.62 2,222.31 2,333.54
Hourly 24.00 25.20 26.46 27.78 29.17
Administrative Analyst Monthly 5,179.00 5,438.00 5,710.00 5,996.00 6,296.00 Biweekly 2,390.31 2,509.85 2,635.38 2,767.38 2,905.85
Hourly 29.88 31.37 32.94 34.59 36.32
Salary Schedule
Salary Schedule
FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 3716 - Continued
Salary Schedule

FIRE MID-MANAGEMENT

MISCELLANEOUS MID-MANAGEMENT
June 20, 2022

Council Packet 292
Exhibit B
City Clerk/Public Information Ofc Monthly 5,903.00 6,198.00 6,508.00 6,833.00 7,175.00 Biweekly 2,724.46 2,860.62 3,003.69 3,153.69 3,311.54
Hourly 34.06 35.76 37.55 39.42 41.39
Finance Department Manager Monthly 5,211.00 5,472.00 5,746.00 6,033.00 6,335.00 Biweekly 2,405.08 2,525.54 2,652.00 2,784.46 2,923.85
Hourly 30.06 31.57 33.15 34.81 36.55
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor Monthly 5,701.00 5,986.00 6,285.00 6,599.00 6,929.00 Biweekly 2,631.23 2,762.77 2,900.77 3,045.69 3,198.00
Hourly 32.89 34.53 36.26 38.07 39.98
Position Frequency A B C D E
Human Resources Manager Monthly 6,093.00 6,398.00 6,718.00 7,054.00 7,407.00 Biweekly 2,812.15 2,952.92 3,100.62 3,255.69 3,418.62
Hourly 35.15 36.91 38.76 40.70 42.73
Info System Coor/GIS Supervisor Monthly 4,688.00 4,922.00 5,168.00 5,426.00 5,697.00 Biweekly 2,163.69 2,271.69 2,385.23 2,504.31 2,629.38
Hourly 27.05 28.40 29.82 31.30 32.87
Planning & Development Manager Monthly 7,196.00 7,556.00 7,934.00 8,331.00 8,748.00 Biweekly 3,321.23 3,487.38 3,661.85 3,845.08 4,037.54
Hourly 41.52 43.59 45.77 48.06 50.47
Police Records Supervisor Monthly 4,383.00 4,602.00 4,832.00 5,074.00 5,328.00 Biweekly 2,022.92 2,124.00 2,230.15 2,341.85 2,459.08
Hourly 25.29 26.55 27.88 29.27 30.74
Principal Planner Monthly 6,853.00 7,196.00 7,556.00 7,934.00 8,331.00 Biweekly 3,162.92 3,321.23 3,487.38 3,661.85 3,845.08
Hourly 39.54 41.52 43.59 45.77 48.06
Public Works Supervisor Monthly 5,371.00 5,640.00 5,922.00 6,218.00 6,529.00 Biweekly 2,478.92 2,603.08 2,733.23 2,869.85 3,013.38
Hourly 30.99 32.54 34.17 35.87 37.67
Recreation Supervisor Monthly 4,265.00 4,478.00 4,702.00 4,937.00 5,184.00 Biweekly 1,968.46 2,066.77 2,170.15 2,278.62 2,392.62
Hourly 24.61 25.83 27.13 28.48 29.91
Transit Maintenance Manager Monthly 5,649.00 5,931.00 6,228.00 6,539.00 6,866.00 Biweekly 2,607.23 2,737.38 2,874.46 3,018.00 3,168.92
Hourly 32.59 34.22 35.93 37.73 39.61
Position Frequency A B C D E
Salary Schedule
Salary Schedule
MISCELLANEOUS MID-MANAGEMENT Continued

POLICE MID-MANAGEMENT
June 20, 2022

Council Packet 293
Exhibit B
Police Commander Monthly 8,295.00 8,710.00 9,146.00 9,603.00 10,083.00 Biweekly 3,828.46 4,020.00 4,221.23 4,432.15 4,653.69
Hourly 47.86 50.25 52.77 55.40 58.17
Police Sergeant Monthly 6,662.00 6,995.00 7,345.00 7,712.00 8,098.00 Biweekly 3,074.77 3,228.46 3,390.00 3,559.38 3,737.54
Hourly 38.43 40.36 42.38 44.49 46.72
Supervisor Safety Dispatcher Monthly 4,446.00 4,668.00 4,901.00 5,146.00 5,403.00 Biweekly 2,052.00 2,154.46 2,262.00 2,375.08 2,493.69
Hourly 25.65 26.93 28.28 29.69 31.17
Position Frequency A B C D E
Community Services Officer Monthly 3,075.00 3,229.00 3,390.00 3,560.00 3,738.00 Biweekly 1,419.23 1,490.31 1,564.62 1,643.08 1,725.23
Hourly 17.74 18.63 19.56 20.54 21.57
Police Officer Monthly 5,231.00 5,493.00 5,768.00 6,056.00 6,359.00 Biweekly 2,414.31 2,535.23 2,662.15 2,795.08 2,934.92
Hourly 30.18 31.69 33.28 34.94 36.69
Property/Evidence Technician Monthly 3,390.00 3,560.00 3,738.00 3,925.00 4,121.00 Biweekly 1,564.62 1,643.08 1,725.23 1,811.54 1,902.00
Hourly 19.56 20.54 21.57 22.64 23.78
Safety Dispatcher I Monthly 3,301.00 3,466.00 3,639.00 3,821.00 4,012.00 Biweekly 1,523.54 1,599.69 1,679.54 1,763.54 1,851.69
Hourly 19.04 20.00 20.99 22.04 23.15
Safety Dispatcher II Monthly 3,639.00 3,821.00 4,012.00 4,213.00 4,424.00 Biweekly 1,679.54 1,763.54 1,851.69 1,944.46 2,041.85
Hourly 20.99 22.04 23.15 24.31 25.52
Position Frequency A B C D E
Custodian Monthly 2,943.00 3,090.00 3,245.00 3,407.00 3,577.00 Biweekly 1,358.31 1,426.15 1,497.69 1,572.46 1,650.92
Hourly 16.98 17.83 18.72 19.66 20.64
Equipment Mechanic III Monthly 4,159.00 4,367.00 4,585.00 4,814.00 5,055.00 Biweekly 1,919.54 2,015.54 2,116.15 2,221.85 2,333.08
Hourly 23.99 25.19 26.45 27.77 29.16
Maintenance Worker I Monthly 3,014.00 3,165.00 3,323.00 3,489.00 3,663.00 Biweekly 1,391.08 1,460.77 1,533.69 1,610.31 1,690.62
Hourly 17.39 18.26 19.17 20.13 21.13

PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSIT MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES
Salary Schedule

POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Salary Schedule
June 20, 2022

Council Packet 294
Exhibit B
Maintenance Worker II Monthly 3,356.00 3,524.00 3,700.00 3,885.00 4,079.00 Biweekly 1,548.92 1,626.46 1,707.69 1,793.08 1,882.62
Hourly 19.36 20.33 21.35 22.41 23.53
Maintenance Worker III Monthly 3,833.00 4,025.00 4,226.00 4,437.00 4,659.00 Biweekly 1,769.08 1,857.69 1,950.46 2,047.85 2,150.31
Hourly 22.11 23.22 24.38 25.60 26.88
Transit Fleet Service Coordinator Monthly 5,179.00 5,438.00 5,710.00 5,996.00 6,296.00 Biweekly 2,390.31 2,509.85 2,635.38 2,767.38 2,905.85
Hourly 29.88 31.37 32.94 34.59 36.32
Position Frequency A B C D E
Transit Mechanic I Monthly 3,772.00 3,961.00 4,159.00 4,367.00 4,585.00 Biweekly 1,740.92 1,828.15 1,919.54 2,015.54 2,116.15
Hourly 21.76 22.85 23.99 25.19 26.45
Transit Mechanic II Monthly 3,961.00 4,159.00 4,367.00 4,585.00 4,814.00 Biweekly 1,828.15 1,919.54 2,015.54 2,116.15 2,221.85
Hourly 22.85 23.99 25.19 26.45 27.77
Transit Mechanic III Monthly 4,159.00 4,367.00 4,585.00 4,814.00 5,055.00 Biweekly 1,919.54 2,015.54 2,116.15 2,221.85 2,333.08
Hourly 23.99 25.19 26.45 27.77 29.16
Transit Shuttle Driver Monthly 2,636.00 2,768.00 2,906.00 3,051.00 3,204.00 Biweekly 1,216.62 1,277.54 1,341.23 1,408.15 1,478.77
Hourly 15.21 15.97 16.77 17.60 18.48
Position Frequency A B C D E
Account Clerk II Monthly 3,356.00 3,524.00 3,700.00 3,885.00 4,079.00 Biweekly 1,548.92 1,626.46 1,707.69 1,793.08 1,882.62
Hourly 19.36 20.33 21.35 22.41 23.53
Administrative Assistant Monthly 3,596.00 3,776.00 3,965.00 4,163.00 4,371.00 Biweekly 1,659.69 1,742.77 1,830.00 1,921.38 2,017.38
Hourly 20.75 21.78 22.88 24.02 25.22
Arts Center Coordinator Monthly 3,213.00 3,374.00 3,543.00 3,720.00 3,906.00 Biweekly 1,482.92 1,557.23 1,635.23 1,716.92 1,802.77
Hourly 18.54 19.47 20.44 21.46 22.53
Assistant Planner/ Monthly 4,535.00 4,762.00 5,000.00 5,250.00 5,513.00 Rehab Housing Specialist Biweekly 2,093.08 2,197.85 2,307.69 2,423.08 2,544.46 Hourly 26.16 27.47 28.85 30.29 31.81
PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSIT MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES - Continued Salary Schedule
Salary Schedule

SECRETARIAL, TECHNICAL & CLERICAL
June 20, 2022

Council Packet 295
Exhibit B
Associate Planner Monthly 5,205.58 5,465.86 5,739.15 6,026.11 6,327.42 Biweekly 2,402.58 2,522.70 2,648.84 2,781.28 2,920.35
Hourly 30.03 31.53 33.11 34.77 36.50
Building Inspector Monthly 4,285.00 4,499.00 4,724.00 4,960.00 5,208.00 Biweekly 1,977.69 2,076.46 2,180.31 2,289.23 2,403.69
Hourly 24.72 25.96 27.25 28.62 30.05
Building-Planning Technician Monthly 3,974.00 4,173.00 4,382.00 4,601.00 4,831.00 Biweekly 1,834.15 1,926.00 2,022.46 2,123.54 2,229.69
Hourly 22.93 24.08 25.28 26.54 27.87
Position Frequency A B C D E
Clerical Assistant II Monthly 3,108.00 3,263.00 3,426.00 3,597.00 3,777.00 Biweekly 1,434.46 1,506.00 1,581.23 1,660.15 1,743.23
Hourly 17.93 18.83 19.77 20.75 21.79
Code Enforcement Officer Monthly 3,754.00 3,942.00 4,139.00 4,346.00 4,563.00 Biweekly 1,732.62 1,819.38 1,910.31 2,005.85 2,106.00
Hourly 21.66 22.74 23.88 25.07 26.33
Code Enforcement Officer II Monthly 4,652.00 4,885.00 5,129.00 5,385.00 5,654.00 Biweekly 2,147.08 2,254.62 2,367.23 2,485.38 2,609.54
Hourly 26.84 28.18 29.59 31.07 32.62
Engineering Technician Monthly 4,271.00 4,485.00 4,709.00 4,944.00 5,191.00 Biweekly 1,971.23 2,070.00 2,173.38 2,281.85 2,395.85
Hourly 24.64 25.88 27.17 28.52 29.95
Fire Inspector/Code Enforcement Monthly 4,048.00 4,250.00 4,463.00 4,686.00 4,920.00 Biweekly 1,868.31 1,961.54 2,059.85 2,162.77 2,270.77
Hourly 23.35 24.52 25.75 27.03 28.38
Information System Technician Monthly 4,415.00 4,636.00 4,868.00 5,111.00 5,367.00 Biweekly 2,037.69 2,139.69 2,246.77 2,358.92 2,477.08
Hourly 25.47 26.75 28.08 29.49 30.96
Police Clerk I Monthly 3,005.00 3,155.00 3,313.00 3,479.00 3,653.00 Biweekly 1,386.92 1,456.15 1,529.08 1,605.69 1,686.00
Hourly 17.34 18.20 19.11 20.07 21.08
Police Clerk II Monthly 3,155.00 3,313.00 3,479.00 3,653.00 3,836.00 Biweekly 1,456.15 1,529.08 1,605.69 1,686.00 1,770.46
Hourly 18.20 19.11 20.07 21.08 22.13
Recreation Coordinator Monthly 3,213.00 3,374.00 3,543.00 3,720.00 3,906.00 Biweekly 1,482.92 1,557.23 1,635.23 1,716.92 1,802.77
Hourly 18.54 19.47 20.44 21.46 22.53
Salary Schedule
SECRETARIAL, TECHNICAL & CLERICAL - Continued

PART-TIME, SEASONAL, TEMPORARY AND UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES June 20, 2022

Council Packet 296
Exhibit B
Rate As of Rate As of
Position Frequency 1/1/2021 1/1/2022
Art Instructor Hourly 14.00 15.00
Assistant Planner Hourly 22.00 22.00
Ballfield Maintenance Hourly 14.00 15.00
Clerical Assistant II Hourly 17.41
EMT - Per Diem Hourly 15.00 15.00
Executive Assistant to the City ManagerMonthly 4,357.00 4,575.00 4,804.00 5,044.00 5,296.00 Biweekly 2,010.92 2,111.54 2,217.23 2,328.00 2,444.31
Hourly 25.14 26.39 27.72 29.10 30.55
Fire Department Secretary Hourly 15.30 15.30
Human Resources Technician Monthly 3,559.00 3,737.00 3,924.00 4,120.00 4,326.00 Biweekly 1,642.62 1,724.77 1,811.08 1,901.54 1,996.62
Hourly 20.53 21.56 22.64 23.77 24.96
Management Anaylst Monthly 5,193.31 5,452.98 5,725.62 6,011.91 6,312.50 Biweekly 2,396.91 2,516.76 2,642.60 2,774.73 2,915.46
Hourly 29.96 31.46 33.03 34.68 36.42
Maintenance Worker I Hourly 14.00 15.00
Office Assistant Hourly 14.00 15.00
Senior Accountant Monthly 5,689.00 5,973.00 6,272.00 6,586.00 6,915.00 Biweekly 2,625.69 2,756.77 2,894.77 3,039.69 3,191.54
Hourly 32.82 34.46 36.18 38.00 39.89
Rate As of Rate As of
Position Frequency 1/1/2021 1/1/2022
Paramedic - Per Diem Hourly 19.00 26.00
Police Cadet Hourly 21.00 Effective 7/01/2022
Recreation/Arts Coordinator Hourly 14.00 15.00
Safety Dispatcher Hourly 33.72 Effective 10/01/2021
Senior Center Activity Coordinator Hourly 14.00 15.00
Senior Center Nutrition Coordinator Hourly 14.00 15.00
Special Projects Manager Hourly 50.00 95.00 125.00 150.00 175.00 Visual Arts Instructor Hourly 14.00 15.00
PART-TIME, SEASONAL AND TEMPORARY UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES - Continued June 20, 2022

Council Packet 297
Exhibit B
Vocal Instructor Hourly 14.00 15.00
Youth Services Coordinator Hourly 14.00 15.00
June 20, 2022

Council Packet 298
1 CITY MANAGER’S/STAFF’S REPORT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: _______June 20, 2022
ITEM NO: 6.

SUBJECT: Approve Removal or Consider Extending the Stay of Enforcement for an Illegal On-Premise Advertising Display at 1630 2nd Street BACKGROUND: On September 20, 2021, the Selma City Council unanimously voted to declare an abandoned sign located at 1630 2nd Street a public nuisance. The owner was ordered to abate the nuisance by removing the illegal on-premise advertising display.

After a public hearing was held on November 1, 2021 to consider objections to the City Council’s direction to City staff to remove the illegal advertising display, the Council voted to adopt Resolution No. 2021-63R (attached) ordering the City removal of the display.

Additionally, the Council directed staff to stay enforcement of the abatement for a period of 90 days to give the property owner additional time to make progress on his planned development project at the site. The property owner had recently paid the planning application fees for his project but had not submitted a completed application as needed by the Planning Division to adequately assess the proposed project.

At the February 7, 2022 City Council meeting, staff brought forth this item for consideration, following the 90 day stay of enforcement period granted by Council in November. After some discussion, and a brief presentation from the applicant Dave Mendrin of West Star Environmental, Inc, Council agreed to continue the item for an additional 60 days, to allow for submission of the remaining items needed for a complete application.

On April 4, 2022, at a public hearing held by the City Council, the sign abatement item was brought back to the City Council. Following a presentation from City staff, City Council made the determination to continue the item for the illegal sign abatement to the regularly scheduled meeting set for June 6, 2022, and directed City staff to move forward with acquiring bids from contractors for the removal of the sign. However, the June 6, 2022 regular Council meeting was cancelled, requiring the follow-up on this item to be rescheduled to the next regular meeting, set for June 20, 2022.

To date, Staff still has not received a completed application; however, Staff has been in contact with the applicant and is aware that there have been some complications with the finalization of the Site Plan and project renderings.

Staff requests Council’s direction to move forward with the City’s abatement of the illegal on-premise advertising display or to extend the stay of enforcement of abatement for an additional period of time. If the Council directs staff to move forward with the abatement, the City shall remove the display utilizing City forces, or a contractor will be retained by the City to do so, and the cost of such removal shall be assessed against the Property as a lien which will remain on the Property until paid in full pursuant Selma Municipal Code Section 8-5-8 and California Business and Professions Code §5499.1 et. seq. Quotes received for a contractor to remove the structure range between $8,000 and $10,500.

June 20, 2022 Council Packet 299
2 ****************************
COST: BUDGET IMPACT:

Undetermined. The staff will need to evaluate
whether the removal can be done by City forces
or should be done through a contractor and the
cost would be determined at that time.

Temporary. The City would bare the
costs of removing the illegal signs
which would be recovered by either
filing a lien against the property, or
reimbursement by the property owner.

FUNDING: ON-GOING COST:

Funding Source: General Fund
Fund Balance:

None.

RECOMMENDATION: Direct City staff to move forward with the City’s abatement of the illegal on-premise advertising display or to extend the stay of enforcement of abatement for an additional period of time.

Trevor Stearns, Contract City Planner
Rob Terry, Deputy City Manager
June 20, 2022 Council Packet 300
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 – R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SELMA ORDERING THE CITY REMOVAL

OF AN ILLEGAL ON-PREMISES ADVERTISING
DISPLAY LOCATED AT 1630 SECOND STREET
WHEREAS, the City of Selma issued a Notice to the owner of the property located at 1630 2nd Street, Selma, California, Fresno County Assessor Parcel No. 388-155-22 the "Property"), that the City Council would consider a Resolution declaring an on-premises advertising display located on the Property illegal and a public nuisance as required by Business and Professions Code §5499.2(b); and
WHEREAS, the sign is an illegal advertising display within the meaning of Business and Professions Code §5499.1 because it is an on-premises advertising display that was legally erected, but has ceased to be used to identify or advertise any ongoing business, and has not been used for that purpose for a period of not less than 90 days prior to October 16, 2020; and
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct and continue a public hearing to December 7, 2020 pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2020 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance and continued the public hearing to January 19, 2021; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance and continued the public hearing to March 15, 2021; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance and continued the public hearing to May 17, 2021; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance and continued the public hearing to July 19, 2021; and June 20, 2022 Council Packet 301
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance; and
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance and voted unanimously to adopt Resolution 202 l-56R declaring the illegal advertising display at 1630 2nd Street a public nuisance and ordering the sign abatement and removal; and
WHEREAS, on November 1, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct a public hearing to consider objections to the City Council's direction to City staff to remove the illegal advertising display; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct a public hearing to consider the aforementioned item Council adopted Resolution 2021-63R directing City staff to remove the display and allowing for a 90-day grace period to allow the property owner to remove the sign himself or move the planned development project forward; and
WHEREAS, on February 7, 2022 the City Council of the City of Selma did consider the aforementioned item; Council made the determination to continue the grace period for an additional 60 days; and
WHEREAS, on April 4, 2022 the City Council of the City of Selma considered the illegal sign abatement procedure and made the determination to continue the grace period for an additional 60 days (originally to June 6, 2022; rescheduled to June 20, 2022) and for City staff to commence acquiring bids from contractors regarding the removal of the sign structure.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as though fully set forth at this point.

2. The advertising display located on the property identified in this Resolution is an illegal on-premises advertising display as defined by Business and Professions Code §5499.1 and a public nuisance, and the property owner has failed to abate the nuisance by removing the illegal on­ premises advertising display located on the Property.

3. Pursuant to Selma Municipal Code Section 8-5-8 and California Business and Professions Code §5499.1 et. seq., the City shall remove the advertising display utilizing City resources, or a contractor retained by the City to do so, and the cost of such removal shall be assessed against the property as a lien which will remain on the property until paid in full.

June 20, 2022 Council Packet 302
This Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Selma at a regular meeting on the 20th of June, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
______________________________
Scott Robertson, Mayor
_____________________________
Reyna Rivera, City Clerk
June 20, 2022 Council Packet 303
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-63 R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SELMA ORDERING THE CITY REMOVAL OF AN ILLEGAL ON-PREMISES ADVERTISING DISPLAY LOCATED AT 1630 SECOND STREET
WHEREAS, the City of Selma issued a Notice to the owner of the property located at 1630 2nd Street, Selma, California, Fresno County Assessor Parcel No. 388-155-22 the "Property"), that the City Council would consider a Resolution declaring an on-premises advertising display located on the Property illegal and a public nuisance as required by Business and Professions Code §5499.2(b): and
WHEREAS, the sign is an illegal advertising display within the meaning of Business and Professions Code §5499.1 because it is an on-premises advertising display that was legally erected, but has ceased to be used to identify or advertise any ongoing business, and has not been used for that purpose for a period of not less than 90 days prior to October 16, 2020; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct and continue a public hearing to December 7, 2020 pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2020 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance and continued the public hearing to January 19,2021; and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance and continued the public hearing to March 15, 2021; and
WHEREAS, on March 15, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance and continued the public hearing to May 17, 2021; and
WHEREAS, on May 17, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance and continued the public hearing to July 19,2021; and
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct the continued public hearing pursuant to Business and Professions Code §5499.2 to determine whether the sign was an illegal on-premises advertising display and a public nuisance and voted unanimously June 20, 2022 Council Packet 304
to adopt Resolution 2021-56R declaring the illegal advertising display at 1630 2nd Street a public nuisance and ordering the sign abatement and removal; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 2021 the City Council of the City of Selma did conduct a public hearing to consider objections to the City Council's direction to City staff to remove the illegal advertising display.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:

I. The forgoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as though fully set forth at this point.

2. The advertising display located on the Property identified in this Resolution is an illegal on-premises advertising display as defined by Business and Professions Code §5499.1 and a public nuisance, and the property owner has failed to abate the nuisance by removing the illegal onpremises advertising display located on the Property.

3. Pursuant to Selma Municipal Code Section 8-5-8 and California Business and Professions Code §5499.1 et. seq., the City shall remove the advertising display utilizing City resources, or a contractor retained by the City to do so, and the cost of such removal shall be assessed against the Property as a lien which will remain on the Property until paid in full.

This Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Selma at a regular meeting on the 15t of November, 2021 by the following vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: ~UERRA,
NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: OCOUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: OCOUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
,c~
0, CRO, ROBERTSON
June 20, 2022 Council Packet 305
CITY MANAGER’S/STAFF’S REPORT June 20, 2022
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ________________________
ITEM NO: 7.

SUBJECT: Consider cancellation of the Regular Council meeting Scheduled for July 5, 2022
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1-5-1(A) of the City’s Municipal Code (“Code”), regular meetings of the City Council are held on the first and third Monday of the month, with the exception of City holidays, where the regular meeting would default to the next regular business day.

Staff has reviewed the summer meeting calendar and recommends City Council cancel the July 5, 2022 meeting. The proposed cancelation would provide additional time during the summer to accommodate vacation time (for both Council and Staff) over the 4th of July weekend. It would also allow for additional time to complete administrative tasks related to fiscal year-end/beginning of the new fiscal year. There are currently several department heads scheduled to be on vacation the week leading up to the July 5th meeting.

DISCUSSION: Staff is recommending the cancellation of the July 5, 2022 regular meeting.

If approved, the next regular meeting will be July 18, 2022.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve the cancelation the July 5, 2022 Council meeting.

Fernando Santillan, City Manager
June 20, 2022 Council Packet 306
CITY MANAGER’S/STAFF’S REPORT June 20, 2022
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ________________________
ITEM NO: 8.

SUBJECT: Consider adoption of Resolution Authorizing Submittal of IBank Loan for Selma Wastewater Collection System Upgrade Project
BACKGROUND: On February 9, 2022, the City Council directed Staff to pursue financing options from the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (IBank), including a potential low-interest loan, to finance critical sewer system upgrades supporting housing and commercial development throughout Selma.

DISCUSSION: The attached Resolution, required by IBank, authorizes the submission of an application for funding up to $23 million. While the City of Selma has not been formally invited to apply and the actual terms of the financing have not been determined, the attached resolution will allow the City to incur “reimbursable expenses” associated with the loan financing.

Attached as Exhibits A & B, respectively, are a Project Description and Selma SKF 2022 CIP Update which describe the planned uses of the IBank funding, if approved.

Prior to officially submitting an application to IBank, Staff will seek final approval from the City Council, which will include a final funding amount, interest rate, and loan terms. Staff anticipates a formal application will be submitted in August 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts associated with the adoption of the Resolution.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve and adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the submission of an application to the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (IBank)
Fernando Santillan, City Manager
June 20, 2022 Council Packet 307
Exhibit A
City of Selma Wastewater Collection
Infrastructure Upgrade Project
Project Description
In order to support housing development, meet our Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) target, and facilitate economic development, the City of Selma is in need of significant upgrades, repairs, and construction of wastewater collection facilities within the City. Currently, various residential and commercial development projects are at a stand-still due to the high cost of the necessary upgrades.

Development/reimbursement agreements would be entered into between the City and the developers of the benefitting projects to reimburse the City for the cost of the improvements. Properties that develop at a later time will be assessed Development Impact Fees.

The list of projects is as follows. Projects which are included in the attached Exhibit C are labeled with their respective letter from Table 1: Proposed Collection System – Selma, Nebraska/Highland Development.
 East Selma Waste Water Trunk Line: ($6,700,000)
 North Selma/Dinuba Trunk Line ($4,500,000)
 Clarkson Lift Station Upgrade ($2,925,800) (K)
 Sunset Lift Station Upgrade ($975,500) (E)
 Rose Lift Station Upgrade ($1,398,300) (I)
 Nebraska Ave 10” Parallel Gravity Main: ($416,700) (C)  18” Line Between Nebraska / Saginaw ($698,100) (F)
 Floral to Highland/Rose 18” Gravity Main ($1,166,200) (G)  Highland Ave to Rose 18” Line to Rose LS ($1,398,300) (H) Total Wastewater Collection Improvement Projects: $20,178,900 *Note: Projects A & B from Exhibit A, Table 1 are not listed above due to a different potential funding source having been identified for those improvements. Project D will be completed with existing City and SKF funding.

Project Timeline
Most of the above mentioned improvements would be ready to break ground within 12-24 months of funding being received.

The East Selma Waster Water Trunk Line, North Selma/Dinuba Trunk Line, Clarkson Lift Station would likely be the first to be built. Development/reimbursement agreements with developers could be finalized within 3 months, civil improvement plans would take 3-4 months, procurement would take an additional 3-months, and environmental review (if necessary) could be done concurrently with the civil plan development. Thus a 9-month groundbreaking is feasible for each of those three projects.

June 20, 2022 Council Packet 308
Exhibit A
Planned Residential and Commercial Development Projects Dependent on the Above Improvements
Improvement: East Selma Waste Water Trunk Line
 Amberwood Specific Plan Area, Phase I: 270 Single Family Residences (SFRs) Lennar Homes has an approved subdivision map in East Selma, which includes 270 single family homes, a 2-acre park, and other amenities. However, the project requires the construction of a 3- mile sewer trunk line, which will eventually serve the entire 2,700 home Specific Plan area.

Improvement: North Selma / Dinuba Trunk Line
 KB Homes / Raven Homes, Tract Map No. 6019: 336 SFRs
KB Homes and local builder Raven Homes are planning a 336 single family home subdivision with a 3-acre park in North Selma. The project requires the construction of a parallel 27” sewer line on Dinuba Ave to Thompson Ave.

Improvement: Clarkson Lift Station / Sunset Lift Station / Nebraska 10” Parallel Gravity Main / 18” Saginaw Line
Clarkson Lift Station collects all wastewater in West Selma (west of Hwy 99) and south of Rose Ave.

Currently, the lift station is at maximum capacity and flows cannot be increased by new development.

Additionally, a smaller lift station (Rose) and sections of existing sewer lines are in need of upgrades to support additional flows. The following are planned, active projects which depend on Clarkson Lift Station and downstream sewer upgrades:
 Yanez Subdivision, Tract Map No. 6401: 175 SFRs
175 single family homes and a 2 acre park. This project is currently in the annexation and subdivision map approval process.
 Southwest Nebraska/Highland Ave Mixed Use Project: 220 SFRs, 100 Multifamily (MF) units Currently in Site Plan Review Phase, this project is a combination of two projects by different adjacent property owners, which will include 220 single family homes, a 100-unit senior living facility, a hotel and event center (currently under contract with the property owner), a Dairy Queen, office/retail space, and 5 acres of park/open space.  Northeast Nebraska/Highland Multifamily/Commercial Project: 165 MF units Plans and environmental review are currently underway for an approximately 165-unit multifamily project, as well as commercial space along Nebraska Ave.  Nebraska Ave Multifamily Infill Project: 82 MF Units
An 82-unit apartment complex is planned in an infill lot on Nebraska Ave adjacent to an existing apartment complex. A planned Phase 2 will include an adjacent commercial use.

June 20, 2022 Council Packet 309
Exhibit A
 Selma Crossings
Currently Planned for Regional Commercial uses, the property owner hopes to develop 60 acres for warehousing/distribution and potentially food manufacturing/industrial uses.

Improvement: Rose Lift Station Upgrade / Floral to Highland/Rose 18” Gravity Main / Highland Ave to Rose 18” Line to Rose LS
 Selma Grove Commercial Center
Nearly 53 acres of regional commercial space is planned on Floral Ave and Hwy 99, including a proposed movie theater. This would be adjacent to a currently under-construction Hilton Hampton Inn, the Selma Toyota dealership, and a shopping center which currently houses Walmart, Boot Barn, JCPenney, Big 5, Starbucks, Chipotle, The Habit Burger, Burger King, and others.
 39 Acres Mixed Use – 792 MF Units
A developer is currently in escrow for nearly 40 acres directly across the street from Walmart for a planned multifamily development up to 792 units and restaurant/commercial space.

June 20, 2022 Council Packet 310

KAMM AVE

MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE

SAGINAW AVE

NEBRASKA AVE

ROSE AVE

FLORAL AVE

HUNTSMAN AVE

DINUBA AVE

SPRINGFIELD AVE

MANNING AVE
PARLIER AVE TEMPERANCE AVE DE WOLF AVE HIGHLAND AVE MCCALL AVE DEL REY AVE BETHEL AVE ACADEMY AVE 48" 24" 24" 24" 10"-P15"
48''
24'' 36'' 18''
33'' 30'' 15'' 27''
12'' 21''
10'' 27''
24''
21'' 24''
12''
12''
15'' 15'' 12'' 21''
48''
10'' 24'' 12'' 24'' 18''
12'' 12''
10''
15'' 18''
27'' 21''
27''
18'' 15'' 18'' 15'' 12'' 18'' 27'' 18'' 21'' 30'' 15''
15'' 24''
36'' 15'' 15'' 12''
15''
15'' 12'' 18'' 12'' 21'' 18'' 18'' 42'' 33'' 30'' 39'' % Legend Ú[ Existing Lift Station - Sufficient Capacity Ú[ Existing Lift Station - Capacity Improvements Ú[ Proposed Lift Station Parallel District Gravity Main
Replace Existing Gravity Main
Proposed Gravity Main
Proposed Force Main
Modeled Gravity Main
Modeled Force Main
Unmodeled Gravity Main
City Sphere of Influence
City Limits
June 20, 2022 Council Packet 311
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2! !2! !2! !2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!!2!
!2!
!2!
!2! !2!
!2!!2!
!2!
!2! !!2! 2!!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!! !2! !2! !2! !2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!!2! !2! 2! !2! !!2!
!!2! !2! 2!
!2!
!2!
!2!!2!
!2!
!2!!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!!2!
!2!!
!2! !2! !2! !2! !2!
!2!!2!
!2!
!2!!
!2!!
!!2!
!2!!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!!2!
!!2! !2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!!
!2!
!2! !2! !2! !2! !2! !2!!
! !2! !2! !2! !2! !2! 2!
!2!
!2!
!2
!2!
!2!!2!
!2!
!2!
!2!
Ú[
Ú[
Ú[
Ú[
Ú[
300
310
290
310
300
300
310
310 310 18''
10''
12''
38507202S
38504232S
39002091
38507207
38522016
38526033
38507206
38803026
38504224
38522013
38504226
38522025
38504230S
39002079 39002053
39002090T 39016005
39003071
39002072
38504225
38504222S
38504221
38522007
38504223S
38522023
38507205
39002054
38522021
39002043
38504220
38522026
15'' 18''
18''
33''
39''
%
Legend
Ú[ Existing Lift Station
Ú[ Proposed Lift Station
!2! Manhole
Modeled Gravity Main
Modeled Force Main
Parallel District Gravity Main
Replace Existing Gravity Main
Proposed Gravity Main
Proposed Force Main
General Parcel
Interim Development Identfied by SKF
Interim Development Identified Previously
A
B
C
D
E
F
G H
I
J,K to south (Not Shown)
June 20, 2022 Council Packet 312
Improvement Description
Estimated
Construction
Cost
Estimated
Total Project
Cost Notes
A Proposed Lift Station serves area shown with a dead lift up to a gravity main. Design Capacity is 450 gpm. $724,800 $1,224,900 B Proposed gravity main: 12-inch diameter. $224,600 $379,600 C Parallel gravity main proposed alongside existing City 10-inch: 10-inch diameter. $246,500 $416,700 D
This gravity main reach was previously identified as Project S-9 at 12-inch diameter. New diameter: 15-inch.

If instead the existing gravity main is to be revieved with a parallel gravity main, a 12-inch diameter parallel main is required. $442,800 $748,300
E
Sunset Lift Station previously identified as sufficient. With intensified flows, requires capacity increase from 669 gpm to 900 gpm. $750,400 $975,500
Assumed that hydraulic and electrical components of lift station would require upgrade.

Assumed that wet well would require reconfiguration and potential excavation. Assumed that above ground structures were sufficient.

F
Previously identified as Project S-9 with 18-inch diameter. No change required. New vertical layout/survey data needs to be updated to the model if layout is to change given conflicts and constraints in improvement. $413,100 $698,100 Discussion with staff indicates that this will be a difficult project because of utility conflicts and potential permits/easements/coordination.

G
Previously identified as Project S-44 with new construction of 18-inch diameter gravity main. No change required. $690,100 $1,166,200
H Previously identified as Project S-22 with upsize to 18-inch diameter. No change required. $699,800 $1,182,600 I
Rose Street Lift Station can accept flows from the tributary area on the figure without improvement. Build-out design capacity required is increased to 1,900 gpm $1,075,600 $1,398,300 Assumed that hydraulic and electrical components of lift station would require upgrade.

Assumed that wet well will require reconfiguration due to increased flows. Assumed that above ground structures were sufficient.

J
Selma Crossing development (to the south, not shown on figure) loaded as indicated. 214 acres are tributary to Clarkson Lift Station. To be conservative, all acreage was classified as commercial, with flow factor of 850 gpd/acre. The resulting generation for Selma Crossing is 182,000 gpd of ADWF (126 gpm). - - K
Clarkson Lift Station (to the south, not shown on figure), has a current capacity of 1,500 gpm compared to a current design flow of 1,940 gpm. Thus, this lift station is deficient under current conditions. The addition of the flows from the parcels shown on Figure 1 and Figure 2 increases the design flow to 3,400 gpm. The buildout design flow for the lift station is currently 4,200 gpm. This compares to a predicted buildout design flow of 3,000 gpm in the 2016 Master Plan. $1,731,240 $2,925,800 Assumed that hydraulic and electrical components of lift station would require upgrade.

Assumed that wet well would require reconfiguration and potential excavation. Assumed that above ground structures were sufficient.

Table 1. Proposed Collection System - Selma
Nebraska/Highland Development
Notes: Estimated Construction Costs are conceptual-level costs appropriate to master planning. These costs assume that improvements are designed and constructed by the District. Estimated Total Costs include a 30% contingency in addition to 30% for District soft costs.

Dopudja and Wells Consulting
SKF County Sanitation District
12/14/21
June 20, 2022 Council Packet 313
CITY OF SELMA RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE SELMA CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING

THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA

INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK
(“IBANK”) FOR FINANCING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,

AUTHORIZING THE INCURRING OF AN OBLIGATION PAYABLE

TO IBANK FOR THE FINANCING OF A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT IF IBANK APPROVES SAID APPLICATION,

DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN

EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF AN OBLIGATION,

AND APPROVING CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION

THEREWITH
WHEREAS, the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (“IBank”) administers a financing program to assist local governments with the financing of eligible projects in accordance with Section 63000 et seq. of the California Government Code (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, IBank created the Infrastructure State Revolving Fund Program (“ISRF Program”) pursuant to the provision of the Act; and
WHEREAS, IBank has instituted an application process for financing under its ISRF Program; and
WHEREAS, IBank’s Criteria, Priorities and Guidelines for the Selection of Projects for Financing under the ISRF Program, dated February 23, 2016, and as may thereafter be amended from time to time (the “Criteria”), establishes requirements for the financing of projects under the ISRF Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Selma (“Applicant”) desires to submit an application (“Financing Application”) to IBank under the ISRF Program for financing and refinancing the costs of Selma Wastewater Collection Infrastructure Upgrade Project (“Project”) in an amount not to exceed $23,000,000; and
WHEREAS, the Act and the Criteria require the Applicant to make, by resolution of its governing body, certain findings prior to a project being selected for financing by IBank; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant expects to incur or pay certain expenditures in connection with the Project from its General Fund that are reimbursable with the proceeds of tax exempt bonds or other tax exempt securities under Federal Tax Law (defined below) prior to incurring indebtedness for the purpose of financing costs associated with the Project on a long-term basis (the “Reimbursement Expenditures”); and June 20, 2022 Council Packet 314
WHEREAS, the Applicant reasonably expects that a financing arrangement (“Obligation”) in an amount not expected to exceed $23,000,000 will be entered into under and memorialized by one or more financing agreements and related documents (collectively, the “Financing Agreement”) and that certain proceeds of such Obligation will be used to reimburse the Applicant for Reimbursement Expenditures incurred or paid prior to incurring the Obligation; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant acknowledges that IBank funds the ISRF Program, in part, with the proceeds of tax exempt bonds and, as such, has certain compliance obligations that may require it to have the Applicant enter into one or more new financing agreements to replace the Financing Agreement (collectively, the “Replacement Agreement”) on terms and conditions substantially identical to the original Financing Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Selma (the “Council”) as follows:

Section 1. The Council hereby approves confirms, ratifies, and affirms all actions of the Applicant’s representatives, employees and officers heretofore taken in connection with, or with respect to, submitting the Financing Application, and the consideration and approval of the Obligation and the Financing Agreement, if IBank approves the Financing Application and the Obligation, and in connection therewith the Council finds and certifies:
a. The Project facilitates the effective and efficient use of existing and future public resources so as to promote both economic development and conservation of natural resources;
b. The Project develops and enhances public infrastructure in a manner that will attract, create, and sustain long-term employment opportunities; c. That the Project is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Selma; d. The proposed financing is appropriate for the Project; e. The Project is consistent with the Criteria; and
f. It has considered (i) the impact of the Project on California’s land resources and the need to preserve such resources; (ii) whether the Project is economically or socially desirable; and (iii) whether the project is consistent with, and in furtherance of the State Environmental Goals and Policy Report (as defined in the Criteria).

Section 2. The Applicant hereby declares its official intent to use proceeds of the Obligation to reimburse itself for the Reimbursement Expenditures with the proceeds of tax exempt bonds or other tax exempt securities issued under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and those Treasury Regulations implementing such provisions (collectively, “Federal Tax Law”). This declaration is made solely for purposes of establishing compliance with applicable requirements of Federal Tax Law and its date is controlling for purposes of reimbursement under Federal Tax Law. This declaration does not bind the Applicant to make any expenditure, incur any indebtedness, or proceed with the Project.

June 20, 2022 Council Packet 315
Section 3. All of the Reimbursement Expenditures were made no earlier than 60 days prior to the date of this Resolution. The Applicant will allocate proceeds of the Obligation to pay Reimbursement Expenditures within eighteen (18) months of the later of the date the original expenditure was paid or the date the Project was placed in service or abandoned, but in no event more than three (3) years after the original expenditure was paid.

Section 4. The City Manager and his or her designee is hereby authorized and directed to act on behalf of the Applicant in all matters pertaining to the Financing Application, and if IBank approves the Financing Application and the Obligation, the execution of related financial documents, including but not limited to the authority to make payments from general fund revenues and other legally available sources of funds for the repayment of the Obligation and to provide covenants relating to the Obligation and as to any security or collateral securing the Obligation.

Section 5. If the Financing Application and the Obligation is approved by IBank, the City Manager and his or her designee is authorized to negotiate, enter into and sign financing documents and any amendments thereto, including, but not limited to the Financing Agreement and the Replacement Agreement, with IBank for the purposes of financing the Obligation.

Section 6. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Selma in a regular meeting assembled on the 20th day of June 2022, by the following vote:

AYES
NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City of Selma this 22nd day of June 2022.
_________________________
Scott Robertson, Mayor
City of Selma
_________________________
Reyna Rivera, City Clerk
June 20, 2022 Council Packet 316
CITY MANAGER’S/STAFF’S REPORT June 20, 2022
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ________________________
ITEM NO: 9.

SUBJECT: Consider Designating a Council Representative for the June 22 State Senate Committee Hearing Regarding AB 2780
BACKGROUND: As the Council is aware, AB 2780 (Arambula) is making its way through the State’s legislative process. If passed into law, AB 2780 would allow the City of Selma to form an EIFD after all outstanding financial obligations to the State and County have been satisfactorily addressed, eliminating the need for a Finding of Completion from the State regarding redevelopment agency dissolution.

AB 2780 is scheduled for committee hearing on Wednesday, June 22 in the Senate Committee on Governance and Finance. Our Government Affairs consultant, Jason Siegen with CrisCom, has recommended that a member of the City Council attend the hearing and speak in support of the bill, along with the City Manager, Mr. Siegen, and the bill’s sponsor, Assemblyman Joaquin Arambula.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council designate a Council representative to attend the June 22 Hearing at the State Capitol in support of AB 2780.

Fernando Santillan, City Manager
June 20, 2022 Council Packet 318