Selma City Council
July 1, 2025

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}

10.1.1 GENERAL
Introduction
A Local Public Agency (LPA) may engage consultants to perform architectural, engineering, and related services to develop a federal-aid funded project. LPAs requesting federal funds to reimburse Architectural and Engineering (A&E) Consultants must follow the selection and contracting procedures detailed in Section 10.1 of this chapter. LPAs using local funds to procure an A&E Consultant on a federal-aid funded project and will not seek federal reimbursement for the consultant cost may choose not to follow the selection and contracting procedures detailed in Section 10.1 of this chapter. LPAs using local funds to procure a Consultant in a Management Support Role (CMSR) are required to obtain FHWA approval (see Section 10.1.9: Retaining a CMSR of this chapter).

Definition of an Architectural and Engineering Consultant 23 CFR 172 and California Government Code 4525 defines A&E services as those private consulting firms providing architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, construction engineering, or program management.

Architectural and Engineering Consultants
The Brooks Act (40 U.S.C.1104) requires LPAs to award federally-funded engineering and design related contracts based on fair and open competitive negotiations, demonstrated competence, and professional qualifications (23 CFR 172), at a fair and reasonable price (48 CFR 31.201-3).

Cost proposals submitted to the LPA must be sealed and must not be included as a criterion for rating such consultants. After ranking, cost negotiations will begin with the most qualified consultant and only their cost proposal will be opened. Should negotiations fail or result in a price that the LPA does not consider fair and reasonable, negotiations must be formally terminated, and the LPA must then undertake negotiations with the second most qualified consultant.

If the negotiations with the second most qualified firm are not successful, negotiations must be formally terminated and the LPA must then undertake negotiations with the third most qualified consultant, and so on, until the price is determined to be fair and reasonable by the LPA.

In selecting an A&E consultant, a detailed technical proposal or qualifications proposal, and a proposed contract will be required.

Depending upon the scope of work, the required contract provisions may need to include the California State Prevailing Wages (Federal Payment of Predetermined Minimum Wage applies only to federal-aid construction contracts). Prevailing wages will apply if the services to be performed will involve land surveying (such as flag persons, survey party chief, rodman or chainman), materials sampling and testing (such as drilling rig operators, pile driving, crane operators), inspection work, soils or foundation investigations, environmental hazardous materials and so forth. California State Prevailing Wage information is available through the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) websites below:

Consultants will need to provide their Prevailing Wage Policy if their participation on the project includes prevailing wage work. The policy will include information on the accounting treatment of 176
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
delta base and delta fringe, and verify the accounting treatment is consistent every year. 177
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• DIR FAQ website
• DIR Wage Determination website
• Caltrans Prevailing Wage Interpretive Guidance
Non-A&E Consultants
Consultants other than A&E consultants may be selected using cost, cost and qualifications (best value), or other critical selection criteria. The procedures outlined in this chapter can be modified for selecting non-A&E consultants by adding a cost item to the contract proposal.

For more details on non-A&E consultants, see Section 10.3: Non-A&E Contracts of this chapter.

Selecting the Project
The LPA is responsible for selecting and initiating a federal-aid financed transportation project.

The decision to begin project development is influenced by the project needs, its acceptability, the timing of studies, financing, and construction. The LPA must identify the project’s objectives including the general level of improvement or service, operating standards, maximum cost, and the target date for project completion before commencing any consultant selection process.

Subcontracted Services
The consultant is responsible for performing the work required under the contract in a manner acceptable to the LPA. The consultant’s organization and all associated consultants and subconsultants must be identified in the proposal. If the consultant wishes to use a subconsultant not specified in the proposal, prior written approval must be obtained from the LPA. The subcontract must contain all required provisions of the prime contract. All subawards must include adequate oversight, management, and administration of engineering and design related consultant services and be administered in accordance with State laws and procedures specified in 23 U.S.C.106(g)(4) and 2 CFR 200.331.

Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
In the procurement of contracts for engineering services by private consulting firms using federal-aid highway funds, LPAs must take all the steps necessary to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse. The LPA must develop and maintain a written code of conduct governing the performance of its employees (including the contract administrator) engaged in the award and administration of federal-aid highway funded contracts, including the prevention of conflicts of interest in accordance with 23 CFR 172.7(b)(4).

A conflict of interest occurs when a public official’s private interests and his or her public duties and responsibilities diverge or are not consistent. Conflicts of interest may be direct or indirect (e.g., as result of a personal or business relationship). The appearance of a conflict of interest should be avoided as an apparent conflict may undermine public trust if not sufficiently mitigated.

Federal Regulation Governing Conflict of Interest (23 CFR 172.7(b)(4)) requires that:
178
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• LPA must maintain a written code of standards of conduct for employees engaged in the award and administration of engineering and design service contracts; • No contracting agency employee who participates in the procurement, management, or administration of federal-funded contracts or subcontracts must have, directly or 179
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
indirectly, any financial or other personal interest in connection with such contract or subcontract;
• No person or entity performing services for a contracting agency in connection with a federal-funded project must have, directly or indirectly, any financial or other personal interest, other than employment or retention by the contracting agency, in any contract or subcontract in connection with such project;
• No person or entity performing services for a contracting agency in connection with a federal-aid highway funded project must have, directly or indirectly, any financial or other personal interest in any real property acquired for the project; • No contracting agency employees or agents must neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from consultants, potential consultants, or parties to sub-agreements;
• LPA must disclose in writing any potential conflict of interest to FHWA.

Consultants Performing Work on Multiple Phases of Federal-aid Projects LPAs sometimes wish to hire the same consultant firm to perform construction engineering and/or inspection services on the same project on which the firm also performed design services. This can cause project delivery efficiencies, as the design firm is well-suited to verify that the project is being constructed in accordance with the design and can resolve issues related to the design on behalf of the contracting agency. However, this may also pose a potential conflict of interest if the firm has a vested financial interest in failing to disclose deficiencies in its design work product and seeks to insulate itself from pecuniary liability in subsequent phases of the project, such as minimizing or ignoring design errors and omissions, rather than serving the best interests of the contracting agency and the public. Procuring a different firm from the design firm to provide the construction engineering and/or inspection services provides another level of review and reduces the risk of, or potential for, a conflict of interest.

Although federal regulations do not expressly prohibit the same firm from providing services on subsequent phases, the LPAs are responsible for ensuring the public interest is maintained throughout the life of a project and that a conflict of interest, real or apparent, does not occur or is sufficiently mitigated by appropriate public agency controls. Prior to allowing a consulting firm to provide services on subsequent phases of the same project, the contracting agency must establish appropriate compensating controls in policies, procedures, practices, and other safeguards to ensure a conflict of interest does not occur in the procurement, management, and administration of consultant services.

When design and construction phase services are procured under a single solicitation, the selection of the consulting firm must be based on the overall qualifications to provide both design and construction phase services, which require different skill sets, experience, and resources. Procuring these services under different solicitations may result in selection of a more qualified firm to perform services in each phase, as the most qualified firm to perform design phase services may not be the most qualified firm to provide construction phase services. Similarly, the qualifications and capacity of a firm may change over time. As such, it may not be appropriate to contract with a consulting firm to provide construction phase services at the outset of a design phase, knowing that these services may not be needed for an extended period until the preconstruction phase of the project is complete and construction 180
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
funding authorized. The contract with a consulting firm providing design phase services on a project may not be amended to include construction phase services unless the desired 181
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
construction phase services were included within the original advertised scope of services and evaluation criteria of the solicitation from which a qualifications-based selection was conducted.

All consultants acting in a management support role must complete Exhibit 10-U: Consultant in Management Support Role Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement (see Section

10.1.9: Miscellaneous Considerations in this chapter) and retain it in the LPA files.

Miscellaneous Considerations Authorization to Proceed
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) must give the LPA an Authorization to Proceed (E-76) with the work prior to performing of any work for which federal reimbursement is to be requested, (see LAPM Chapter 3: Project Authorization). Eligible consultant contracts may be procured using local funds prior to receiving the E-76, but reimbursement is for work performed after the E-76 authorization date. If contract is procured using state or local funds, federal procedures must have been followed if seeking federal reimbursement. For state-funded projects see Section 10.2: State-Only Funded A&E Contracts and LAPG Chapter 25: State Programs for Local Agency Projects, for guidance on when work may proceed.

Copies of the Authorization to Proceed and the consultant contract must be retained in the LPA project files for future audit.

10.1.2 IDENTIFYING & DEFINING A NEED FOR CONSULTANTS
The need for a consultant is identified by comparing the project’s schedule and objectives with the LPA’s capabilities, its staff availability of the required expertise, and its funding resources. If the LPA does not have sufficient staff capabilities, it may solicit assistance from another agency, or use a qualified private consultant to perform the required work.

If the LPA determines that there is a need to solicit assistance from another LPA, or to use a consultant, the District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) should be notified if federal-aid funds are to be requested for the project segment to be contracted out.

Appointing the Contract Administrator
The Contract Administrator is responsible for ensuring the quality of consultant contract products or services. The Contract Administrator is appointed as soon as the need for consultant services is identified. The Contract Administrator is involved throughout the development of the selection process and the contract provisions, and in the administration of the consultant’s work. The Contract Administrator must be a qualified LPA employee or have staff that is qualified to ensure the consultant’s work is complete, accurate, and consistent with the terms and conditions of the consultant contract. On federal-aid contracts, the Contract Administrator or staff members must be a full-time employee and familiar with the work to be contracted out and the standards to be used. The Contract Administrator must also abide by the laws, regulations and policies required as part of accepting federal or state funding for their project. Non-compliance with the laws, regulations, and policies may result in loss of project funding.

The Contract Administrator’s duties are listed in 23 CFR 172.9(d)(1) and include:
 Contract negotiation, contract payment, and evaluation of compliance performance, and quality of services provided by the consultant;
 Being familiar with the contract requirements, scope of services to be performed, and 182
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
products to be produced by the consultant;
183
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
 Being familiar with the qualifications and responsibilities of the consultant’s staff and evaluating any requested changes in key personnel;
 Scheduling and attending progress and project review meetings, commensurate with the magnitude, complexity, and type of work, to ensure the work is progressing in accordance with established scope of work and schedule milestones;  Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract records as specified in 2 CFR 200.333;
 Provides direction to ensure the proposed work is advertised properly;  Prepares and distributes the Request for Qualifications (RFQ), description of work, and Request for Proposals (RFP), if used;
 Prepares the draft contract;
 Arranges for preparation before an independent estimate of the value of the work to be contracted out;
 Ensures that the selection procedures are followed;
 Analyzes the selected/best-qualified consultant’s cost proposal;  Ensures contract audit and review procedure is followed;  Ensures that fee/profit negotiation is conducted and keeps records;  Serves as the LPA’s primary contact person for the successful consultant;  Monitors the consultant’s progress and provides direction;  Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable in accordance with the Federal cost principles and consistent with the contract terms as well as the acceptability and progress of the consultant’s work;
 Identifies other LPA staff for the consultant to contact, if needed;  Closes out the contract at completion, by processing the final invoice; completing a mandatory consultant evaluation, and final DBE utilization reports (Exhibit 17-F: Final Report Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) and First-Tier Subcontractors) or Exhibit 17-F1: Final Report-Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) and First-Tier Subcontractors for On-Call Contracts.

Segmenting Consultant Work
Consultant services are most effective when consultant work is segmented appropriately. The extent of segmenting depends upon the type and complexity of the work. Combining preliminary engineering tasks with the preparation of the required environmental analysis is normally desirable. Preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is more than simply writing a report. Assessment and impact reports include preliminary engineering needed to analyze project alternatives and produce an engineering and planning assessment. Initial project studies include only as much traffic and engineering analysis of alternatives, as is needed to produce a sound EA or EIS (see LAPM Chapter 6 Environmental Procedures and Standard Environmental Reference (SER) Chapters 31:Environmental Assessment (EA)/Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Chapter 32:Environmental 184
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Impact Statement (EIS). Final design must not begin until NEPA environmental approval has been received if federal reimbursement is desired.

Refer to Figure 10-2: Segmenting Consultant Work below, which illustrates several satisfactory ways to segment consultant activities.

Figure 10-2: Segmenting Consultant Work
Specify Products to be Delivered
The Contract Administrator identifies the products and services to be delivered as a result of consultant contract work, and minimum qualification of consultant professionals and staff. These vary depending upon the type of projects and the phase of project development being addressed.

Scope of Consultant Work
The scope of work, which the contract must include, is a detailed description of the products or services the consultant is to provide. From a detailed scope of work, consultants respond to a project advertisement, determine personnel and time requirements, and develop a technical proposal. Therefore, the scope of work must be clear, concise, complete, and describe the deliverables, standards for design and other work, quality control measures, acceptance criteria and deadlines.

Title VI Assurances
Title VI Assurances Appendices A and E must be included in each consultant contract. Include Title VI Assurances Appendices B, C, and D if applicable. The consultant must include the Title 185
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
VI Assurances Appendices A and E, and if applicable Appendices B, C, and D in all subcontracts to perform work under the contract. Include Title VI Assurances Appendices B, C, and D if applicable. Refer to Exhibit 10-R: A&E Boilerplate Agreement Language, Article XXXII Title VI Assurances.
186
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Non-Discrimination Clause
The Non-Discrimination Clause (Exhibit 10-R: A&E Boilerplate Agreement Language, Article XVI Non-Discrimination Clause and Statement of Compliance) must be included in each consultant contract. The consultant must include the non-discrimination and compliance provisions of the Non-Discrimination Clause in all subcontracts to perform work under the contract.

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Participation
When administering federal-aid projects, federal regulations (49 CFR 26) require the LPA to comply with the DBE program and take necessary steps to ensure that DBE firms have the opportunity to participate in the projects. Refer to Chapter 9: Civil Rights and Disadvantaged Business Enterprises for DBE requirements for A&E Consultant Contracts.

Estimated Cost of Consultant Work
An independent estimate for cost or price analysis is needed for all consultant contracts (23 CFR 172.7(a)(1)(v)(B)) to ensure that consultant services are obtained at a fair and reasonable price. The estimate must be prepared prior to opening the cost proposal from the top-ranked consultant, so the LPA has a cost comparison to evaluate the reasonableness of the consultant’s cost proposal. The estimate, which is specifically for the use of the LPA’s negotiating team, is to be kept confidential and maintained for records.

A good cost estimate can be prepared only if the scope of work is defined clearly. The scope of work must include a list of the products or services which the consultant is required to deliver, and a time schedule of when they must be delivered.

It should be stressed that all work to be derived from the consultant services, such as preliminary design, environmental, or final design, must be clearly identified in the solicitation of consultant services (RFQ or RFP) and included in the cost estimate. The addition of work to the original scope by amendment should be avoided whenever possible. Contract modifications are required for any amendments to the terms of the existing contract that change the cost of the contract; significantly change the character, scope, complexity, or duration of the work; or significantly change the conditions under which the work is required to be performed.

Some of the costs estimating techniques are:

Analogous Estimating:

Analogous cost estimating is using the actual cost of a previous, similar contract as the basis for estimating the cost of the current contract. Analogous cost estimating is frequently used to estimate costs when there is a limited amount of detailed information about the project.

Analogous cost estimating is generally less accurate, and it is most reliable when previous projects are similar in fact, and not just in appearance, and it uses expert judgment.

Parametric Estimating:

Parametric estimating is a technique that uses statistical relationship between historical data and other variables to calculate a cost estimate for an activity resource. This technique can produce a higher level of accuracy depending upon the sophistication, as well as underlying resource quantity and the cost data. A cost example would involve multiplying the planned quantity of work by the historical cost per unit to obtain the estimated cost of the contract. 187
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Bottom-up Estimating:

This technique involves estimating the cost for individual work in the contract with the lowest level of detail. This detailed cost is then summarized or rolled up to determine a total cost of contract. Cost detail should include estimated hours per task, labor hourly cost for professional and non-professional classifications, subconsultant costs, other project direct costs, and profit.

Labor costs should be broken down to direct labor and indirect cost rates, if possible.

If more than one project or phase of work is to be developed within the consultant contract, separate cost estimates are required for each project or phase of work. Separate cost estimates are required for each milestone and portion of the work expected to be subcontracted.

For on-call (as-needed) contracts, the cost estimate/analysis should include at minimum, a historical analysis of annual needs for consultant work, professional labor cost and market analysis, and reasonable profit analysis.

Determine Type of Contract
Types of contracts to be used are described as follows:
• Project-specific contract is between the LPA and consultant for the performance of services and a defined scope of work related to a specific project or projects. • Multi-phase contract is a project-specific contract where the defined scope of work is divided into phases which may be negotiated and executed individually as the project progresses.
• On-call contract is a contract that may be utilized for a number of projects, under which task or work orders are issued on an as-needed basis, for an established contract period and maximum total contract dollar amount. On-call contracts are typically used when a specialized service of indefinite delivery or indefinite quantity is needed for a number of different projects, such as construction engineering, design, environmental analysis, traffic studies, geotechnical studies, and field surveying, etc. Many agencies use these contracts to address peaks in workload of in-house engineering staff and/or to perform a specialized service which the agency does not have. On-call contracts must specify a reasonable maximum length of contract, not to exceed five (5) years, and a maximum total contract dollar amount (23 CFR 172). The maximum dollar amount for all contracts awarded under the solicitation must be stated in the solicitation. The maximum dollar amount is the aggregate of the on-call contracts anticipated to be awarded. For example, if the solicitation lists that up to five (5) contracts may be awarded, the aggregate amount of these 5 contracts is the maximum contract dollar amount. Setting maximum amount on each on-call contract under a multiple on-call solicitation does not meet the intent of 23 CFR 172. How many contracts are anticipated to be awarded must be stated in the solicitation. How task orders will be issued must be stated in the solicitation.

There are two options on how task orders must be awarded under multiple on-call contracts for the same type of service under the same solicitation:

1. Through an additional qualifications-based selection procedure also known as mini-RFP.
• Solicit task order to the multiple on-call consultants on the master on-call contracts
188
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
o Master on-call contracts are contracts awarded to on-call consultants at the initial RFQ/RFP procurement process. o Solicitation may be informal, e.g. email, letter, etc.; documentation is required.
o Evaluation criteria must be included in the solicitation. The miniRFP contains evaluation criteria that matches the strengths of the qualified firms to the specifics of the known tasks, thereby selecting the most qualified firm for each task.
o The evaluation criteria can include:
i. availability of personnel,
ii. staff capabilities,
iii. DBE (10% or less of overall score); the overall DBE goal was established at the master on-call contract,
iv. completion of time,
v. experience of consultant
vi. specialized expertise, and past performance.
• Evaluate and rank proposals and select from the multiple on-call contracted consultants
o Recommend at least three panel members to evaluate and rank o Evaluate based on criteria in mini-RFP solicitation
• Negotiate and award to the on-call contracted consultant o The mini-RFP or the task order will be negotiated with first ranked firm from each competition. Task order (mini-RFP) cost will be based on wage rates established in the master on-call contract, and the time and deliverable requirements in the task order. • If only one proposal is received or there is an emergency, a NonCompetitive process must be justified, and Exhibit 12-F must be documented and signed by the DLAE
• Awarding task order to the multiple on-call consultants on a rotational basis does not meet the intent of the qualifications-based selection • Exhibit 10-G must be used to track percentage of DBE after a task order is completed
• Each task order must have an Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2 as applicable

2. Regional basis where each on-call consultant is contracted to a designated area.

To maintain the intent of the Brooks Act (40 U.S.C.1101-1104) in promoting open competition and selection based on demonstrated competence and qualifications, oncall consultant contracts established through the RFQ process must meet the following requirements:
189
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• Must define a general scope of work, complexity, and professional nature of services.
190
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• Specify a task order procedure the LPA uses to procure project-specific work under the contract.
• Task order work performed after the master on-call contract has expired will result in those costs being ineligible for federal or state reimbursement. • If multiple consultants are to be selected and multiple on-call contracts awarded through a single solicitation for specific services, the number of consultants that may be selected or contracts that may be awarded must be identified. • Specify procurement procedures in the contracts the LPA will use to award/ execute task orders among the consultants:
o Either through an additional qualification-based selection process (see the Two-Step RFQ/RFQ process later in this chapter), OR o On regional basis whereby the region is divided into areas identified in the solicitation, and consultants are selected to provide on-call services for assigned areas only. The RFP may list multiple regions that allow consultants to crossover or be a “backup” to other consultants that for specifically documented reasons are not able to perform the work in their assigned region. Per 23 CFR 172.9 (a)(3)(B)(2), the “backup” option needs to be listed in the respective contracts.

An example of acceptable contract wording in multiple on-call contracts for the same type of service:
• “Agency has or will enter into three (3) task order contracts for performance of the Scope of Services identified in Exhibit “A”, including this Agreement (“CM Services Task Order Contracts”). The other CM Services Task Order Contracts are [identify other two contracts by agreement numbers and consultant firms].

The total amount payable by Agency for the CM Services Task Order Contracts must not exceed a cumulative maximum total value of Seven Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($7,500,000) (“NTE Sum”). It is understood and agreed that there is no guarantee, either expressed or implied that this dollar amount will be authorized under the CM Services Task Order Contracts through Task Orders. Each time a Task Order is awarded under any of the CM Services Task Order Contracts, the Agency must send written notification to Consultant and each of the other consultants entering into the CM Services Task Order Contracts. The notice must identify the total funds allocated under issued Task Orders, and the remaining unencumbered amount of the NTE Sum. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that Agency must not pay any amount under this Agreement that would exceed the NTE Sum, and Consultant must not enter into a Task Order that exceeds the NTE Sum.”
Determining the Project Schedule
The LPA develops a schedule for performance of work and completion of the project. The schedule must include sufficient time to allow for:
• Selecting the consultant;
191
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• Developing the consultant contract;
192
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• Completing the A&E consultant contract audit process; • Conducting meetings and project reviews.

Determine Method of Payment
The method of payment of contract must be specified. The following four methods are permitted under 23 CFR 172.9(b) depending on the scope of services to be performed (sample cost proposals are provided on the A&E website):
• Cost-Plus-Fixed Fee
• Cost Per Unit of Work
• Specific Rates of Compensation
• Lump Sum
The method of payment to the consultant must be set forth in the original solicitation, contract, and in any contract modification thereto. A single contract may contain different payment methods as appropriate for compensation of different elements of work. Markups are not allowed on any of the four methods of payment.

The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of payment must not be used. Both of these methods are explicitly prohibited by 23 CFR 172.9(b).

Cost-Plus-Fixed Fee
The consultant is reimbursed for costs incurred and receives an additional predetermined amount as a fixed fee (profit). Federal regulations require that profit be separately negotiated from contract costs. The determination of the amount of the fixed fee must take into account the size, complexity, duration, and degree of risk involved in the work. The fixed fee is not adjustable during the life of the contract. The fixed fee dollar amount must be clearly stated in the contract. See the A&E website for a useful tool on Profit/Fee Determination.

This method of payment is appropriate when the extent, scope, complexity, character, or duration of work cannot be precisely predicted. The fixed fee limit applies to the total direct and indirect costs. Fixed fees in excess of 15 percent of the total direct labor and indirect costs of the contract may be justified only when exceptional circumstances exist. The contract must specify a reasonable maximum length of contract period and a maximum total contract dollar amount (see Exhibit 10-R: A&E Sample Contract Language, Article V, Option 1). The contract cost proposal must identify all key employees and/or classifications to be billed. New key employees and/or classifications must be approved by the LPA before they incur work on the contract, or the costs can be questioned or disallowed. LPAs are not required to update the A&E Consultant Contract form when new key employees and/or classification are added to a contract. For more details, reference Section 10.1.8. Completing the Project.

Cost Per Unit of Work
The consultant is paid based on specific item of work performed. The item of work must be 193
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
similar, repetitious, and measurable, such as a specific geotechnical investigation and material testing. This method of payment is appropriate when the cost per unit of work can be determined with reasonable accuracy in advance, but the extent or quantity of the work is indefinite. Contract payment provisions must specify what is included in the price to be paid for each item. Any item of work not identified in the contract cost proposal is not eligible for 194
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
reimbursement. New items of work (those within the original scope of work only) must be amended into the contract before work is performed. The contract must also specify a reasonable maximum length of contract period and a maximum total contract dollar amount (see Exhibit 10-R, Article V Option 2).

Specified Rates of Compensation
The consultant is paid at an agreed and supported specific fixed hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly rate, for each class of employee engaged directly in the work. Such rates of pay include the consultant’s estimated costs and net fee (profit). Federal regulations require that profit be separately negotiated from contract costs. The specific rates of compensation, except for an individual acting as a sole proprietor, are to include an hourly breakdown, direct salary costs, fringe benefits, indirect costs, and net fee. Other direct costs may be included, such as travel and equipment rentals, if not already captured in the indirect cost rate. Other direct costs regardless of amount are to be listed on the cost proposal.

This method of payment should only be used when it is not possible at the time of procurement to estimate the extent or the duration of the work, or to estimate costs with any reasonable degree of accuracy. This method should not be used for project-specific contracts and is recommended for on-call contracts for specialized or support type services, such as construction engineering and inspection, where the consultant is not in direct control of the number of hours worked, and it also requires management and monitoring of the consultant’s level of effort and the classification of employees used to perform the contracted work. The contract must also specify a reasonable maximum length of contract period and a maximum total contract dollar amount (see Exhibit 10-R, Article V Option 3).

Lump Sum
The consultant performs the services stated in the contract for an agreed amount as compensation, including a net fee or profit. This method of payment is appropriate only if the extent, scope, complexity, character, duration, and risk of the work have been sufficiently defined to permit fair compensation to be determined and evaluated by all parties during negotiations (see Exhibit 10-R, Article V: Option 4). Normally, a lump sum contract will be paid in full at end of the contract when completed. However, a lump sum contract can be negotiated with progress payment if feasible. The progress payment must be based on percent of work complete or completion of clearly defined milestones. The contract cost proposal must document the agreed-upon progress payment and include the necessary milestones costs, or the percent work complete schedule.

Changes to the cost proposal requiring resubmittal to Independent Office of Audits and Investigations (IOAI) for review:
• Consultant/subconsultant name change
• New participating subconsultant’s ICR
• Change in ICR rate
Since these changes require an amendment, the LPA is to update the A&E Consultant Contract form.
195
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
A firm fixed price method of payment is not the same as lump sum. A firm fixed price contract must not be amended.
196
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}

10.1.3 A&E CONSULTANT AUDIT AND REVIEW PROCESS
This section outlines the audit and review process for A&E contracts that at any time use state or federal-aid highway funds in furtherance of highway construction projects. All proposed A&E contracts and supporting documents are subject to audit or review by Caltrans’ Independent Office of Audits and Investigations (IOAI), other state audit organizations, or the federal government. Not all proposed contracts will be audited or reviewed; rather, they will be selected on a risk-based approach.

Applicable Standards
State and federal requirements listed below, and specific contract requirements, serve as the standards for audits and reviews performed.

LPAs, consultants, and subconsultants are responsible for complying with state, federal, and specific contract requirements. LPAs are responsible for determining the eligibility of costs to be reimbursed to consultants.

Applicable standards include, but are not limited to:
 Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM);
 State and Federal agreements between LPAs and Caltrans, (i.e., Master Agreements);  Project Program Supplemental Agreements;
 23 U.S.C., Section 112 – Letting of Contracts;
 40 U.S.C., Chapter 11: the Brooks Act;
 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services;
 23 CFR, Chapter 1- Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation;  48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Chapter 1, Part 31- Contract Cost Principles and Procedures;
 48 CFR, Chapter 99 – Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), Subpart 9900;  2 CFR 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards;
 United States Government Accountability Office, Government Auditing Standards - Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS);  California Government Code sections 4525-4529; and
 Proposed contract terms and conditions.

See Section 10.1.11: References of this chapter for links to above referenced standards.

Audit Guidance Available
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Uniform Audit & Accounting Guide (AASHTO Audit Guide), which is referred to frequently in this section, is a valuable tool to guide LPAs, consultants, and Certified Public Accountants (CPA) through the requirements for establishing, and audits of FAR-compliant Indirect Cost Rates (ICR). The 197
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
AASHTO Audit Guide is used extensively as an industry guide in the audit and review process. 198
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
LPAs may seek accounting assistance from internal audit staff and an independent CPA for compliance. The consultant may seek professional guidance in selecting its independent CPA.

See also the AASHTO Audit Guide, Ch 2.5C. Selection of CPA Firm as Overhead Auditor for guidance in the selection process. Training is also offered by FHWA’s National Highway Institute (see https://www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov/home.aspx). Courses offered include:
 Using the AASHTO Audit Guide for the Procurement and Administration of A&E Contracts (FHWA-NHI-231028)
 Using the AASHTO Audit Guide for the Development of A&E Consultant Indirect Cost Rates (FHWA- NHI-231029)
 Using the AASHTO Audit Guide for the Auditing and Oversight of A&E Consultant Indirect Cost Rates (FHWA-NHI-231030)
For training and additional information provided by Caltrans Local Assistance, visit the Caltrans Local Assistance Blog. For FHWA’s Q&A for ICRs and audits, and A&E related services, visit FHWA.

Allowable Costs
23 U.S.C.112(b)(2)(B) states that any A&E contract or subcontract awarded, whether funded in whole or in part with federal-aid highway funds in furtherance of highway construction projects, must be performed and audited in compliance with the Federal cost principles.

LPAs are required to perform a cost analysis to ensure all costs are allowable and in compliance with federal and state requirements and retain documentation of negotiation activities and resources. Hourly rate(s) for each key personnel and/or classification of employee(s) proposed in cost proposals must be reasonable for the work performed and actual, allowable, and allocable in accordance with the Federal cost principles. Costs must be allowable only if the cost is incurred and cost estimates included in negotiated prices are allowable in accordance with the federal and state regulations and procedures, and contract provisions.

LPAs are required to apply Caltrans-accepted consultant or subconsultant’s ICRs, to contracts.

An ICR is valid for the one-year applicable accounting period accepted or reviewed by Caltrans.

Consultants must update, on an annual basis, ICRs in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and in compliance with the Federal cost principles. For further guidance, refer to 23 CFR 172.11(b)(1). If the consultant is subject to Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), the consultant must use the applicable ICR for the contract.

A consultant’s accepted ICR for its one-year applicable accounting period must be applied to contracts; however, once an ICR is established for a contract, it may be extended beyond the one-year applicable period, through the duration of the specific contract, provided all concerned parties agree. Agreement to the extension of the one-year applicable period must not be a condition or qualification to be considered for the work or contract award. The contract must clearly specify the ICR period if it is beyond the one-year applicable period.

Consultants must account for costs appropriately and maintain records, including supporting documentation, adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, and are allowable, reasonable, and allocable to the contract, and comply with Federal cost principles.

IOAI and representatives of the Federal Government have the right to conduct an audit of all contract costs. If the costs are subsequently determined to be unallowable, these costs are 199
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
subject to repayment. For further guidance, refer to 23 CFR 172 and 48 CFR 31. 200
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Generally, whenever LPAs, consultants, and/or contractors are unable to provide requested documentation, it must be viewed that the services were either not performed or the costs not properly recorded. Retention of all documents is required as it reduces the possibility of audit findings and disallowed costs. For more references, refer to Applicable Standards in this chapter.

Safe Harbor Rate
Developing ICRs annually can place a significant burden on some small or new and emerging A&E consulting firms that lack financial sophistication to develop an ICR, as well as on other established A&E consulting firms that may not have previous experience with federally-funded contracts for which an ICR would have been developed in compliance with Federal cost principles 48 CFR 31. This may create a barrier for otherwise eligible and qualified firms to compete for federally-funded contracts.

To help alleviate and remove potential barriers, the Division of Local Assistance (DLA) has adopted Caltrans Division of Procurement and Contract’s (DPAC) Safe Harbor Rate (SHR) process and rates which took into account LPAs’ data. The SHR information and rates can be found at the following DLA A&E website: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/guidanceand-oversight/consultant-selection-procurement. To request information regarding the SHR methodology, email the DLA A&E branch at [email protected]. Eligible A&E consultant firms can choose to use the DLA SHR rate on new A&E contracts using federal-aid highway funds executed by LPAs in the State of California.

Use and application of the SHR by eligible firms provides reasonable assurance of consultant compliance with the Federal cost principles per 23 CFR 172.11(c)(2). A&E consulting firms approved to use the established SHR will have their accounting system evaluated for capabilities of accumulating and tracking direct labor for applying the SHR, as well as for billing other direct costs by contract, segregating indirect costs, etc.

Use of the SHR is voluntary on behalf of the A&E consulting firm and LPAs. LPAs have the discretion to determine certification of eligibility based on requirements shown on the following SHR certification form: Consultant Firm Certification of Eligibility and Certification of Financial Management System.

A&E consultant firms (prime and/or sub consultants) that have not had an ICR previously accepted by a cognizant agency may elect and request to use the SHR in a contract by submitting the completed SHR certification form, Consultant Firm Certification of Eligibility and Certification of Financial Management System, including the Questionnaire for Evaluating Consultant Firm’s Financial Management System section, and any other documents as needed.

This requirement is in addition to the A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process requirements described in this chapter.

It is the LPA’s responsibility to:
• Collect and screen all requests to use the safe harbor indirect cost rate. See SHR certification form, Consultant Firm Certification of Eligibility and Certification of Financial Management System, including the Questionnaire for Evaluating Consultant Firm’s Financial Management System section.
• Submit all SHR documents to the Independent Office of Audits & Investigations (IOAI) as part of the Financial Document Review Request package. The IOAI email address is:
201
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
[email protected].
202
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Requests to use the safe harbor indirect cost rate must be accepted/approved by IOAI before contracts are executed.

Approval or Acceptance of Indirect Cost Rates
Cognizant Letters of Approval
A cognizant approved ICR has been audited by a Cognizant agency (a State transportation agency of the State where the consultant's accounting and financial records are located or a State transportation agency to which cognizance for the particular indirect cost rate(s) of a consulting firm has been delegated or transferred to in writing by the State transportation agency where the consultant’s accounting and financial records are located) in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards to test compliance with the requirements of the Federal cost principles (per 48 CFR 31), and the cognizant agency has either 1) issued an audit report of the consultant's indirect cost rate or 2) conducted a review of an audit report and related workpapers prepared by a certified public accountant and issued a letter of concurrence with the audited indirect cost rate(s). The cognizant agency approves the ICR and a cognizant approval letter is issued.

Caltrans Acceptance of Indirect Cost Rate
When the ICRs have not been established by a cognizant agency, Caltrans must perform an audit or review of a consultant’s and subconsultant’s ICR(s) to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with Federal cost principles.

An audit or review of the ICR may consist of one or more of the following:
• Perform a review to determine if the ICR was prepared in accordance with 23 CFR Part 172, and 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31;
• Perform an audit to determine if the ICR was prepared in accordance with 23 CFR Part 172, and 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31; and issue an audit report; • Review and accept an ICR audit report and related workpapers prepared by a CPA or another State Transportation Agency;
The outcome of an audit or review is for Caltrans to approve or accept the ICR so that it can be relied upon for future contracts with the consultant for a given one-year accounting period and for reliance by other contracting agencies using the same consultant. LPAs must ensure that only approved or accepted ICRs of consultants for the applicable one-year accounting period be applied to contracts, if rates are not under dispute. LPAs may check IOAI’s website for consultant’s approved or accepted ICRs. All approved or accepted ICRs are issued an Acceptance Identification (ID) number by IOAI that is posted to IOAI’s website. This ID number should be referenced on all future contracts that use the same fiscal year ICR. ICR can be fixed for the life of the contract in prior written document or annually updated. Once it has been updated, it must be annually updated and the most current fiscal year of ICR must be used.

ICRs that have not been accepted by Caltrans will not be eligible for indirect cost payment. An ICR approved by a cognizant agency may be used across states for the one-year applicable accounting period, but an ICR accepted by Caltrans may only be applied to A&E contracts with Caltrans or LPA contracts using pass-through Caltrans funding. LPAs include Cities, Counties, 203
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Metropolitan Planning Organizations, Special Districts, and Regional Transportation Planning Agencies.
204
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Financial Review Performed Prior to Contract Execution
All consultants, including prime and subconsultants, on a proposed contract with a dollar value equal to or greater than $1M are subject to an ICR financial review by IOAI. The financial documents required are detailed in the Financial Document Review Request form. IOAI will review the ICR financial documents to either accept or adjust the indirect cost rate prior to contract execution using a risk-based approach as dictated by factors that include but are not limited to:
• History of satisfactory performance and professional reputation of consultant; • Prior FAR compliant history and audit frequency;
• Experience of consultant with FAHP contracts;
• General responsiveness and responsibility;
• The approximate contract volume and dollar amount of all A&E contracts awarded to the consultant by Caltrans or an LPA in California within the last three calendar years; • The number of states in which the consultant does business; • The type and complexity of the consultant’s accounting system; • The relevant professional experience of any CPA performing audits of the consultants indirect cost rate;
• Assessment of consultant’s internal control. Responses to internal control questionnaire, see AASHTO Audit Guide, Appendix B;
• For ICRs that have been adjusted by IOAI, the consultant must provide a revised cost proposal that reflects the adjusted ICR.

Local Public Agencies’ Responsibilities
LPAs are responsible for obtaining all required ICR supporting documentation from A&E prime consultants and sub-consultants as outlined in the Financial Document Review Request form.

LPAs are responsible for forwarding these documents to IOAI for review. LPAs are also required to ensure that IOAI has a copy of the Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System form. The ICR included in the LPA’s cost proposal must match the ICR included in the Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System form and the consultant’s ICR schedule. The proposed ICR, however, can be lower than ICR in the Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System form and the consultant’s ICR schedule if the consultant elects to propose a lower ICR. For contracts spanning more than one year, LPAs are responsible for ensuring the Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System form and cost proposals are updated annually unless all concerned parties agree to fix the ICR for the term of contract, and this is clearly specified in the contract. ICR updates are not required to IOAI if the ICR is fixed for the life of the contract. ICR’s are only reviewed for consultants that are being awarded a contract, not consultants on a shortlist or prequalified list.

The cost proposal includes contract costs: direct salary or wage rates, fixed fees, other direct costs, indirect costs, total costs, and certification for the costs. LPAs must perform and retain documentation of activities and resources used to support that a cost analysis has been performed to establish that costs and elements were determined to be fair and reasonable in 205
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
accordance with Federal cost principles.
206
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
All contract supporting documentation must be retained by the LPA in project files for the required retention period. Unsupported costs may be disallowed and required to be returned to Caltrans. Having proper documentation policy and procedures, trained staff, and organized project files are essential for demonstrating that costs claimed and reimbursed have been incurred, are eligible, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract and comply with Federal cost principles.

Contracts below $1 Million are not subject to the Caltrans Financial Document Review but LPAs are required to establish that all costs are in compliance with the Federal cost principles, 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, and other applicable requirements are met. All documents listed above, and cost analysis documents are required to be retained in the project files to demonstrate compliance.

Instructions are provided in the Financial Document Review Request form including requirements for submitting a complete Financial Review packet. Financial packets can be emailed to: [email protected].

Alternatively, if you do not have internet access, you can mail Financial Review packets to:

Department of Transportation
Independent Office of Audits and Investigations
MS 2 Attention: External Audit Manager
P.O. Box 942874
Sacramento, CA 94274-0001
Consultants’ Responsibilities (Both prime consultants and subconsultants) A&E prime consultants and subconsultants in contract with LPAs using state or federal-aid highway funds should refer to the Financial Document Review Request form for the ICR financial documents required to be submitted to their LPA. Consultants must complete the Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System form that attests that the ICR rate proposed is in compliance with FAR (48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31) and that the consultant’s financial management system is adequate to accumulate and segregate reasonable, allowable, and allocable direct and indirect project costs. The Financial Document Review Request and Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System forms should be submitted to the LPA who will forward a copy to IOAI along with all other related and required financial documents. For all future contracts within a same fiscal year, the consultant needs to only provide a copy of the Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System form to the LPA.

Consultants must follow all the federal, state, and contract requirements outlined above in the Section above, “Applicable Standards”. Each contracting consultant must ensure its ICR is not combined with any parent company’s or subsidiary’s ICR.

ICR schedules for both prime consultants and sub-consultants should be prepared using the accrual basis of accounting and be presented in compliance with the Federal cost principles.

Figure 10-3 provides an example of a Standard Indirect Cost Rate Schedule that consultants can use when preparing their own.

For public works Prevailing Wage contracts, all workers must be paid the prevailing wage rate determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations according to the type of work and location of the project: http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/Prevailing-Wage.html. 207
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
For guidance see Caltrans’ Prevailing Wage Interpretive Guidance and webinar on IOAI’s website.

When determined necessary, IOAI may request additional information, such as a labor distribution summary and Executive Compensation Analysis (ECA). A consultant’s labor distribution summary report is a labor expense report that detail all hours worked (paid and unpaid) for a fiscal year, wages earned, and benefits accrued by all the consultant’s employees.

The labor summary report should include employee names, salaries, hourly rates, total hours worked segregated by direct hours, indirect hours, paid time off hours, and uncompensated hours and amounts.

An ECA is an evaluation by the consultant to determine the allowability and reasonableness of executive compensation in compliance with Federal cost principles and the AASHTO Audit Guide that can be based on either the National Compensation Matrix or independent compensation surveys.

Independent Office of Audits and Investigations’ Responsibilities After IOAI receives a consultant’s complete financial document packet (per the Financial Document Review Request form) from the LPA, IOAI will review the proposed ICR and supporting documents and notify LPAs in writing whether the proposed ICRs are accepted or adjusted.

Contracts will be executed after IOAI either accepts or adjusts the ICR. Correction of the final cost proposal, however, does NOT need to be cleared through Caltrans IOAI before executing the contract. An email notification from IOAI serves as documentation to support an accepted ICR.

Audits and Reviews to be Performed
After contract execution, a consultant’s ICR may be subject to further detailed review or audit by IOAI based on certain risk factors. Costs that are determined to be unallowable as a result of the review or audit will be subject to repayment.

Indirect Cost Rate Audits
During an ICR audit, IOAI or an independent CPA will examine the consultant’s proposed ICR for a one-year accounting period to ensure that unallowable costs have been removed from the indirect costs, that allowable costs have been correctly measured and properly charged and allocated, and that the ICR has been developed in accordance with the Federal cost principles (as specified in 23 U.S.C.112(b)(2)(B), 23 CFR 172.11, 48 CFR 31 and other FAR and State requirements). As a result of the audit, the LPA will work with the consultant to adjust the ICR based on audit recommendations.

For guidance regarding the existing policies and procedures set forth in the federal regulations, and acceptable ICR schedules, refer to the AASHTO Audit Guide, Chapter 5, and Figure 10-3 Standard Indirect Cost Rate Schedule in this Chapter. There is also a review program at Appendix A which serves as a guide for CPAs and IOAI when performing ICR audits and can also be used as a resource for consultants when preparing for an ICR audit.

CPA Workpaper Reviews
208
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
During a workpaper review of a CPA audit of an ICR, IOAI will review the CPA’s audit workpapers to determine whether to issue a Cognizant Letter of Approval for the ICR. The CPA 209
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Workpaper Review determines whether: (a) the CPA’s audit of the ICR was conducted in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS), (b) the CPA adequately considered the auditee’s compliance with the Federal cost principles and related federal and state laws and regulations. Chapter 11 of the AASHTO Audit Guide provides information to the CPA on the required audit disclosures.

IMPORTANT NOTE FOR CPAs: Contracts receiving state or federal funds are highly scrutinized. Materiality levels tend to be lower and more testing is required. GAGAS provides that auditors may find it appropriate to use lower materiality levels as compared with the materiality levels used in non-GAGAS audits because of the public accountability of government entities and entities receiving government funding, various legal and regulatory requirements, and the visibility and sensitivity of government programs. The AASHTO Audit Guide should be used as a tool for performing audits and attestations of A&E firms.

Contract Audits
During a Contract Audit, auditors will review a consultant’s financial management system and contract cost proposal to determine if:
• The consultants’ accounting system is adequate to accumulate and segregate costs; • Costs are reasonable, allowable, allocable, and supported adequately; • The contract contains all required fiscal provisions; • Proper state and federal procurement requirements were followed.

Incurred Cost Audits
During an Incurred Cost Audit, auditors will review incurred contract costs to determine if:
• Cost data are maintained in an accounting system that adequately gathers, records, classifies, summarizes, and reports accurate and timely financial data for direct and indirect project costs by account;
• Costs are adequately supported, reasonable, allowable, and allocable; • Costs incurred are in compliance with state and federal laws and regulations; • Costs incurred are in compliance with the Master Agreement and Supplemental Agreement;
• Costs incurred are in compliance with the fiscal provisions stipulated in the contract; and • The terms required by the Master Agreement and federal laws and regulations are in the contract.

Audit Findings and Review Deficiencies
If a consultant’s ICR is audited or reviewed, LPAs are responsible for ensuring all executed and future contracts reflect the audited and adjusted fiscal year ICR(s). LPAs should request reimbursement from the consultant for overpayment on rates that were adjusted down.

The LPAs may be subject to sanctions outlined in Section 10.5 Sanctions if the state or federal 210
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
government determines that any reimbursements to the consultant are the result of lack of proper contract provisions, unallowable charges, unsupported activities, or an inadequate financial management system.
211
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Example of a FAR Compliant Indirect Cost Rate Schedule - Sample Consulting Company Statement of Direct Labor, Fringe Benefits, and General Overhead for the Year Ended December 31, 20xx Description
General
Ledger
Balance
Unallowable FAR
Reference
Total
Proposed
Home
Office
Field
Office
Direct Labor $123,456,789 ($934,568) (1)(15) $122,522,221 $85,765,555 $36,756,666 Fringe Benefits
Vacation/Paid Leaves $17,283,950 $17,283,950 $12,098,765 $5,185,185 Payroll Taxes $1,530,864 ($30,617) (15) $1,500,247 $1,050,173 $450,074 Medical Insurance $10,864,197 $10,864,197 $7,604,938 $3,259,259 401K Match $4,938,272 $4,938,272 $3,456,790 $1,481,481
Incentives and Bonus $15,308,642 ($3,123,456) (2) $12,185,186 $8,529,630 $3,655,556 Other Employee
Benefits $2,515,280 ($553,433) (3) $1,961,847 $1,373,293 $588,554 Total Fringe Benefits $52,441,206 ($3,707,506) $48,733,700 $34,113,590 $14,620,110 General &
Administrative Overhead
Indirect Overhead
Labor $72,696,030 ($4,452,541) (1)(2)(4)(15) $68,243,489 $65,790,948 $2,452,541 Purchased
Labor/Subconsultants $22,433,019 ($22,433,019) (5) $ - $ - $ - Office Rent $12,345,679 ($987,654) (6) $11,358,025 $11,038,025 $320,000 Supplies & Utilities $5,753,086 $5,753,086 $4,027,160 $1,725,926 Postage and
Shipping $1,770,000 $321,456 (5) $2,091,456 $1,464,019 $627,437 Equipment and
Maintenance $3,812,346 $3,812,346 $2,512,789 $1,299,557 Depreciation
Expense $6,202,469 ($1,345,678)
(7) $4,856,791 $3,205,482 $1,651,309
Interest $123,456 ($123,456) (8) $ - $ - $ -
Dues and
Subscription $123,456 ($12,345) (9) $111,111 $77,778 $33,333 Advertising &
Marketing $427,406 ($45,678) (10) $381,728 $267,210 $114,518 Vehicles $5,896,123 ($147,403) (5)(11)(14) $5,748,720 $4,024,104 $1,724,616 Bad debts $12,345 ($12,345) (12) $ - $ - $ -
Legal and
Accounting Services $3,713,580 ($222,815) (13) $3,490,765 $3,490,765 $ - Fines and Penalties $80,000 ($80,000) (16) $ - $ - $ -
Total General &
Admin. Overhead $135,388,995 ($29,541,478) $105,847,517 $95,898,280 $9,949,237 212
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Total Indirect Costs $154,581,216 $130,011,870 $24,569,347 Indirect Cost Rates 126.17% 151.59% 66.84%
Figure 10-3: Standard Indirect Cost Rate Schedule
213
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
FAR References:
(1) FAR 31.202: Uncompensated overtime.
(2) FAR 31.205-6: Profit distribution and excess of the reasonable compensation. (3) FAR 31.205-46, 31.205-14 & 31.205-51: Meals not for valid business purposes and associated with lobbying and lacking adequate support
(4) FAR 31.201-2: Administrative staff costs billed to projects/clients. (5) FAR 31.201-2: Subconsultant labor and other direct costs billed to and paid by contracts/clients.
(6) FAR 31.205-36 and 31.205-17: Capital lease costs, rent paid in excess of reasonable costs, and idle facilities and capacity costs.
(7) FAR 31.201-2 & 31.205-6: Costs relates to personal use by employees and luxury vehicles.
(8) FAR 31.205-20: Interest and other financial costs not allowable. (9) FAR 31.201-2: Non-business-related dues and subscriptions. (10) FAR 31.205-1: Costs for advertisement and public relations costs and trade show expense including labor.
(11) FAR 31.205-46(d) and 31.205-6(m)(2): Personal use of vehicle and lack of mileage logs and business purpose.
(12) FAR 31-205-3: Bad debts and collection costs.
(13) FAR 31.205-27 and 31.205-47: Reorganization and capital raising related costs and costs incurred in connection with violation of a law or regulation by the consultant. (14) FAR 31.205-46: Unreasonable costs and costs not supported by documents and lack of business purpose.
(15) FAR 31.201-6(a) & CAS 405-40: Labor costs associated with unallowable costs. (16) FAR 31.205-15: Fines and penalties resulting from violations of laws and regulations.

10.1.4 CONSULTANT SELECTION METHODS
Figure 10-4: Consultant Selection Flowchart shows the three methods normally used in selecting a consultant. They are:
 One-Step RFP
 One-Step RFQ
 Two-Step RFQ/RFP
The method used depends upon the scope of work, the services required, the project’s complexity, and the time available for selection of the consultant.

Beginning with Section 10.1.5: Consultant Selection Using the One–Step RFP Method, each of the selection methods is explained in detail. Regardless of the method used, the LPA must retain all consultant selection documentation in their project files as required by 23 CFR 172.

One-Step RFP
The One-Step RFP method may be used for Project–specific contracts when the scope of work 214
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
is well-defined or for multi-phased contracts where the defined scope of work is divided into phases. Other considerations include when the consultant’s services are highly specialized and there are few qualified consultants.
215
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
One-Step RFQ
The One-Step RFQ method is used when the requested services are specialized, or the scope of work is defined broadly and may include multiple projects. Typical services are preliminary engineering, surveying, environmental studies, preparation of Plans Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) and environmental documents, or construction management. This method or the twostep selection process is used for procurement of on-call contract(s). Note that specifications and requirements in the RFQ must cover all aspects of the final need. An RFP specific to the project, task, or service must be included in the solicitation for evaluation of a consultant's specific technical approach and qualifications.

Two-Step (RFQ Followed by RFP)
The Two-Step RFQ/RFP method may be used when the scope of work is complex or unusual.

This method also may be preferred by LPAs that are inexperienced about negotiations and procedures for establishing compensation. However, the Two-Step RFQ/RFP method is recommended for procurement of multiple on-call contracts, or on-call list, through a single solicitation. Regardless of any process utilized for prequalification of consultants or for an initial assessment of a consultant's qualifications under a RFQ, an RFP specific to the project, task, or service is required for evaluation of a consultant's specific technical approach and qualifications.

For more information, refer to description of on-call contract in Section 10.1.2: Identifying & Defining a Need for Consultants. This method requires substantially more work and time than the other two methods described above.
216
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Negotiate Contract with Next
Highest Ranked Consultant until
Successful
Negotiate Contract with Next
Highest Ranked Consultant until
Successful
Initiate Project Select Consultants
Complete
Project
“One-Step, RFP” Method: Request for Proposal followed by Negotiation (Use when there are few consultants)
Establish
DBE Goals
Determine Type of Contract
 Lump Sum
 Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee
“One-Step, RFQ” Method: Request for Qualifications followed by Interviews and Negotiation (Use when there are many consultants)
 Cost Per Unit of Work
 Specific Rates of Compensation
Same as “One-Step
RFQ” Method
Same as “One-Step RFP” Method
Complete First Step
 Select Project
 Set Project Objectives
 Appoint Contract Administrator
 Determine Project Schedule
Appointment
Consultant
Selection
Committee and
Development
Schedule for
Selection
Evaluate Reference Checks &
Other Information Gathered
Independantly
Develop
Contract
Initiate A&E
Consultant Audit
Process(Figure 10-2)
Identify need
for consultant
Segment
Project Work
Develop
Technical Criteria
for Evaluation of
Proposals
Prepare
Request for
Proposal
Advertise for
Consultants
Issue Request
for Proposal
(RFP)
Conduct
Consultant’s
Conference or
Answer
Written
Questions
Receive and
Evaluate
Technical
Proposals
Notify
Consultants
of Short-List
Interview &
Develop Final
Ranking of
Consultants
Notify
Consultants
of Results
*Request Cost Proposal & Negotiate
Contract with Top-Ranked
Consultant
Execute
Contract
Develop
Qualification
Criteria for
Evaluation of
Proposals
Appoint
Consultant
Selection
Committee and
Develop Schedule
for Selection
Receive Conformance
Letter from A&I and
Implement Findings
Specify
Productsto be
delivered
Evaluate Reference Checks &
Other Information Gathered
Independently
Appoint
Consultant
Selection
Committee and
Develop Schedule
for Selection
Initiate A&E
Consultant Audit
Process (Figure
10-2)
Develop
Contract
Define Scope
of Consultant
Work Develop
Qualification
Criteria for
Evaluation of
Proposals
Negotiate Contract with Next
Highest Ranked Consultant until
Successful
Determine
Method of
Consultant
Selection
Estimate Cost
of Consultant
Work
Advertise
for
Consultants
(RFQ)
Conduct
Consultant’s
Conference
or Answer
Written
Questions
Receive
Statements of
Qualifications
Evaluate
Statements of
Qualifications &
Develop Shortlist
Notify
Consultants
of Shortlist
Interview
Top-Ranked
Consultants
Interview &
Develop Final
Ranking of
Consultants
Notify
Consultants
of Results
*Request Cost Proposal & Negotiate
Contract with Top-Ranked
Consultant
Develop
Final
Contract
217
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Advertise
for
Consultants
(RFQ)
Conduct
Consultant’s
Conference
or Answer
Written
Questions
Evaluate
Statements of
Qualifications
& Develop
Shortlist
Notify
Consultants
of Shortlist
Conduct
Consultant’s
Conference or
Answer
Written
Questions
Receive and
Evaluate
Technical
Proposals
Notify
Consultants
of Shortlist
Develop
Final
Interview &
Ranking of
Consultants
Notify
Consultants
of Results
*Request Cost Proposal & Negotiate
Contract with Top-Ranked
Consultant
“Two-Step, RFQ/RFP” Method: Request for Qualifications followed by Request for Proposal and Negotiation (Use when scope of work is complex)
Figure 10-4: Consultant Selection Flowchart
Issue Request
for Proposal
(RFP)
Evaluate Reference Checks &
Other Information Gathered
Independently
Develop
Contract
Initiate A&E
Consultant Audit
Process (Figure
10-2)
Receive
Statements of
Qualifications
Administer
Contract
Issue Notice
to Proceed to
Consultant
218
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}

10.1.5 CONSULTANT SELECTION USING THE ONE-STEP RFP METHOD Of the three methods discussed, this one is most easily modified for non-A&E consulting contracts. This procurement procedure usually involves a single step process with issuance of a request for proposal (RFP) to all interested consultants. For non-A&E consulting contracts, a cost proposal must be part of the RFP and the selection criteria. For A&E contracts, the cost proposal is not requested until the consultants have been final ranked based upon their submitted technical proposal.

Appoint Consultant Selection Committee
A consultant selection committee with a minimum of three members is appointed at the beginning of the consultant selection process. The committee reviews materials submitted by consultants, develops a shortlist of qualified consultants, and develops a final ranking of the most qualified proposals. Representation on the committee includes the Contract Administrator and subject matter experts from the project’s functional area. The members should be familiar with the project/segment to be contracted out and with the LPA standards that will be used in the contract. Participation by a Caltrans district representative is at the option of the agency and subject to availability of the DLAE staff. Caltrans participation on the interview panel does not relieve the LPA of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed, and all requirements are met.

LPA Contract Administrator ensures that all committee members meet the conflict-of-interest requirements (23 CFR 172) by completing and signing a conflict-of-interest statement prior to selection process initiation. A sample conflict of interest form is provided in Exhibit 10-T: Conflict of Interest & Confidentiality Statement.

Develop Technical Criteria for Evaluation of Proposals
The Contract Administrator is responsible for developing the technical criteria, and their relative importance which are used to evaluate and rank the consultant proposals. In-State or local preference must not be used as factor in the evaluation, ranking, and selection phase. All nontechnical evaluation criteria, including DBE participation, must not exceed 10 percent (23 CFR 172.7(a)(1)(iii)(D)). All price or cost related items which include, but are not limited to, cost proposals, direct salaries/wage rates, indirect cost rates, and other direct costs are prohibited from being used as evaluation criteria.

The criteria and relative weights must be included in the RFP, and the same criteria and relative weights must be used in the evaluation sheets. Failure to include criteria and relative weights and to use the same criteria and weights during the evaluation will result in the contract costs being ineligible for federal or state reimbursement. Exhibit 10-B: Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a recommended evaluation sheet with criteria and rating points for A&E consultants, where cost is not used as a rating factor. This format is not mandatory, but it is recommended in the interest of developing consistency among the hundreds of agencies and consultants operating in the state. The LPA should consult with the DLAE before making major changes to the suggested approach.

Develop Schedule for Consultant Selection
Before the contract is advertised, the Contract Administrator completes a contract procurement 219
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
schedule including key dates for consultant selection activities. The Contract Administrator should confirm key dates with all selection committee members before completing the schedule. 220
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Prepare RFP
The information required in an RFP solicitation includes the following:
• Description of project;
• Clear, accurate, detailed Scope of work, technical requirements, and qualifications; • Services to be performed;
• Deliverables to be provided;
• Procurement schedule;
• Applicable standards, specifications, and policies;
• Schedule of work (including estimated start and end dates of the contract); • Method of payment, and cost proposal requirements. The cost proposal is submitted in a separate concealed format. Cost proposals are requested from the highest ranked firm.

If these negotiations are formally terminated, the cost proposal is then requested from the next highest ranked firm. See sample cost proposals at the A&E website; • Contract audit and review process requirements (see Section 10.1.3: A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process);
• Proposal format and required contents;
• Method, criteria, and weighting for selection;
• Requirements for any discussions that may be conducted with three or more of the most highly qualified consultants following submission and evaluation of proposals; • Specify contract type;
• Special provisions or contracts requirements;
• A DBE contract goal is specified in the solicitation (see Exhibit 10-I: Notice to Proposers DBE Information), if a federal-aid contract;
• CMSR requirements (see Exhibit 10-U: Consultant in Management Support Role Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement);
• Protest procedures and dispute resolution process per 2 CFR 200.318(k) and 23 CFR 172.5(c)(18).
• Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – disadvantage business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, age, or disability in consideration for an award.

The RFP specifies the content of a proposal, the number of copies required, due date, mailing address, and a physical address where the submittals may be hand-delivered if different from the mailing address. A minimum of fourteen (14) calendar days is required between the time the RFP is published and time that proposals must be submitted. More time may be required for 221
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
complex contracts or projects.

Items typically required in a technical proposal include:
222
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• Work plan (specify what is to be covered);
• Organizational chart;
• Schedule and deadlines;
• Staffing plan;
• Proposed Team—complete for prime consultant and all key subconsultants; • Key personnel names and classifications—key team members identified in the original proposal/cost proposal must not change (be different than) in the executed contract; • Staff resumes;
• Names of consultant’s project manager and the individual authorized to negotiate the contract on behalf of the consulting firm;
• Consultant DBE Commitment document, see Exhibit 10-O1: Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment;
• References.

Financial Management and Accounting System Requirements The LPA must ensure that consultant contract solicitation and advertising documents (RFPs) clearly specify that contracts must not be awarded to a consultant without an adequate financial management and accounting system as required by 48 CFR 16.301-3, 2 CFR 200, and 48 CFR 31. The LPA must ensure the selected consultants have adequate financial management systems as required by the applicable federal regulations.

Advertise for Consultants
The solicitation process for consultant services must be by public advertisement, or by any other public forum or method that assures qualified in-State and out-of-State consultants are given a fair opportunity to be considered for award of contract. The minimum length of advertisement is 14 calendar days.

Advertisement of the RFP in a major newspaper of general circulation, technical publications of widespread circulation, professional associations and societies, recognized DBE organizations, web hosting or clearing houses known for posting government contract solicitations such as Bid Sync, Planetbids, Public Purchase, or posting the RFP on the LPA’s or other widely used websites are all acceptable methods of solicitation.

To document website postings, the LPA should retain copies of screen shots displaying the posted begin/end dates.

The LPA must keep a record of all consultants that have downloaded RFP online as well as those receiving an RFP through other means, to ensure that any inquiry responses, addendums, or amendments to the RFP are given to all consultants that received the RFP.

Conduct Proposer’s Conference or Answer Written Questions The LPA may allow for clarification of the RFP by inviting submittal of written questions or by 223
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
conducting a proposer’s conference, or by doing both. The LPA must publish or mail their responses to any written questions to all consultants receiving the RFP. No response should be given to verbal questions. It is important that all competing consultants receive the same 224
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
information. If a proposer’s conference is to be held, the exact time and place must be specified in the RFP. Attendance at a proposer’s conference normally is not mandatory. However, consultants not attending the conference do not receive notes from the meeting unless they request the notes.

Receive and Evaluate Technical Proposals
The Contract Administrator must verify that each proposal contains all of the forms and other information required by the RFP. If all required information is not provided, a proposal may be considered nonresponsive and rejected without evaluation. Late submittals, submittals to the wrong location, or submittals with inadequate copies are considered nonresponsive and must be rejected. Submittal of additional information after the due date must not be allowed.

Documentation of when each proposal was received must be maintained in the project files.

Copies of date stamped envelope covers or box tops are recommended. The members of the consultant selection committee must evaluate each proposal according to the technical criteria listed in the RFP. Minimum of three proposals must be received and evaluated. If only two proposals are received, a justification must be documented to proceed with the procurement.

The justification should state that the solicitation did not contain conditions or requirements that arbitrarily limited competition per 23 CFR 172(a)(1)(iv)(D) and competition is determined to be inadequate and it is not feasible or practical to re-compete under a new solicitation per 23 CFR 172(a)(3)(iii)(C). If only one proposal is received, a Non-Competitive process must be justified and an Exhibit 12-F must be documented and signed by the DLAE. In either case, the readvertisement of the RFP should be considered as an option.

The committee must also evaluate reference checks and other information gathered independently. Reference checks must be completed, and other information gathered before the interviews are conducted. If necessary, the results of the reference checks or other information may be discussed with the highest ranked qualified consultants at the interviews.

Develop Final Ranking and Notify Consultants of Results The selection committee evaluates each proposal, interviews the three or more highest ranked consultants (short listed) if noted in solicitation, and develops a final ranking of the highest ranked consultants. All consultants that submitted proposals must be informed about the final ranking of consultants. It is important that all competing consultants receive the same information.

Most consultants will request information as to why they were not the highest ranked. The LPA may have an established procedure adopted for conducting debriefings but may also consider the following: The selection committee should keep notes as to why a particular consultant was not selected. When a consultant requests debriefing, the reasons for not being selected must be objective reasons. The consultant should not be compared to others and should not be provided with information about other consultants during this debriefing. Normally, the Contract Administrator does the debriefing; however, any member of the selection committee may be designated to do the debriefing.

Negotiate Contract with Top-Ranked Consultant
Cost proposal (for both Prime and all Subconsultant), and contract audit and review documents such as the Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System and Financial 225
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Document Review Request forms, whichever is applicable (see Section 10.1.3: A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process) should be submitted in a separate sealed envelope. Typically, the 226
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
cost proposals are submitted by the short-listed consultants only, at time of interview. However, if time is of the essence and it can be justified, or if no interviews are planned, the cost proposal can be requested from all consultants with their technical proposal.

The cost proposal for the most qualified consultant will be opened and used to begin negotiations. If agreement cannot be reached, then negotiations proceed to the next most qualified consultant. Each consultant’s cost proposal must remain sealed until negotiations commence with that particular consultant. The goal of negotiations is to agree on a final contract that delivers the services, or products required at a fair and reasonable cost to the LPA. At the completion of successful cost negotiations, all remaining sealed envelopes containing cost proposals must be returned to consultants.

Cost proposals in electronic form must be submitted separately from the RFP and contained in a secure database that is inaccessible to the members involved in the A&E consultant contract procurement process. Only the cost proposal of the most qualified consultant will be requested to be sent to the members. Cost proposals of unsuccessful consultants are confidential and must not be opened by the LPA or any private entity that the LPA uses to store the cost proposals. Any concealed cost proposals of the unsuccessful consultants must be returned unopened or properly disposed of in accordance with the LPA’s written policies and procedures.

The independent cost estimate, developed by the LPA in advance of requesting a cost proposal from the top-ranked consultant, is an important basis and tool for negotiations or terminating unsuccessful negotiations with the most qualified consultant. Items necessary for the independent cost estimate include, hours/detailed work, direct labor costs, indirect labor costs, other direct costs, and profit/fee. Agencies must retain documentation of how the cost estimate was developed. It can be revised, if needed, for use in negotiations with the next most qualified consultant. A contract audit and review may be required (see Section 10.1.3: A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process in this chapter). LPA Contract Administrator ensures that all required documentations are provided to Caltrans IOAI within 10 days of written request, including all documents for a Financial Review, if applicable. Caltrans IOAI will not proceed with a Financial Document Review until all required documentation is completed correctly and submitted.

Negotiations should be finalized after addressing all deficiencies noted in the Caltrans IOAI Financial Review Letter if applicable. An indirect cost audit may be performed within the record retention period of the contract.

Items typically negotiated include:
• Work plan;
• Schedule and deadlines (for deliverables and final duration of contract); • Products to be delivered;
• Classification, wage rates, and experience level of personnel to be assigned; • Cost items, payments, and fees. Fee is required to be negotiated as a separate element;
• Hours, level of effort by task and/or classification.

The consultant’s ICR is not a negotiable item. A lower rate cannot be negotiated by the LPA. 227
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
The LPA and the consultant will agree on the final cost proposal and incorporate into final contract. Retain all documentation related to negotiations. 228
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Before executing the consultant contract, the LPA must review contract to ensure that all federal and state requirements have been met and adjustment or denial of ICR as identified in the Financial Review Letter has been included in the final cost proposal, if applicable.

Prior to contract award, or after contract award but no later than the first invoice, the LPA must submit a completed A&E Consultant Contract form for all new federal funded A&E consultant contracts using the database at:
https://dla.dot.ca.gov/fmi/webd/AE%20Consultant%20Contract%20Form (please use Firefox or Chrome if not supported by your browser). Submission of the A&E Consultant Contract form is not required for non-A&E consultant contracts.

If there are any changes requiring an amendment to the contract after submittal of the A&E Consultant Contract form, refer to Section 10.1.8: Contract Amendments.

10.1.6 CONSULTANT SELECTION USING THE ONE-STEP RFQ METHOD The RFQ method is used when the services being procured are specialized, or the scope of work is defined broadly and may include multiple projects.

Appoint Consultant Selection Committee
A consultant selection committee with a minimum of three members is appointed at the beginning of the consultant selection process. The committee reviews and scores the materials submitted by consultants in response to the RFQ, develops a shortlist of qualified consultants, interviews those consultants, and develops a final ranking of the most qualified consultants.

Representation on the committee includes the Contract Administrator and subject matter experts from the project’s functional area. The members should be familiar with the scope of work to be contracted out and with the LPA standards that will be used in the contract.

Participation by a Caltrans district representative is at the option of the LPA and subject to the availability of the DLAE staff. Caltrans participation on the interview panel does not relieve the LPA of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed, and all requirements are met.

LPA Contract Administrator ensures that all committee members meet the conflict-of-interest requirements (23 CFR 172) by completing and signing a conflict-of-interest statement prior to selection process initiation. A sample conflict of interest form is provided in Exhibit 10-T: Panel Member Conflict of Interest & Confidentiality Statement.

Develop Technical Criteria for Evaluation of Qualifications The Contract Administrator is responsible for developing the technical criteria, and their relative importance which are used to evaluate and rank the consultant qualifications. The criteria and relative weights must be included in the RFQ, and the same criteria and relative weights must be used in the evaluation sheets. Failure to include criteria and relative weights and to use the same criteria and weights during the evaluation will result in the contract costs being ineligible for federal or state reimbursement. Exhibit 10-B: Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a recommended evaluation sheet with criteria and rating points for A&E consultants, where cost is not used as a rating factor. This format is not mandatory, but it is recommended in the interest of developing consistency among the hundreds of agencies and consultants operating in the state. The LPA should consult with the DLAE before making major changes to the suggested 229
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
approach.
230
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Develop Schedule for Consultant Selection
Before a contract is advertised, the Contract Administrator completes a contract procurement schedule including key dates for consultant selection activities. The Contract Administrator should confirm target dates with all selection committee members before completing the schedule.

Prepare RFQ
As a minimum, the RFQ generally includes the following:
• General description of the services or project(s);
• Scope of work;
• Schedule of work (including contract begin and end dates); • Method of payment, and cost proposal requirements. The cost proposal is submitted in a separate sealed envelope. See sample cost proposals at the A&E website; • Contract audit and review process requirements (see Section 10.1.3: A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process);
• Statement of Qualification (SOQ) format and required content to be submitted; • Method and criteria and weights for selection;
• A DBE contract goal is specified in the solicitation (see Exhibit 10-I: Notice to Proposers DBE Information), if a federal-aid contract;
• Consultants acting in a management support role requirements Exhibit 10-U: Consultant in Management Support Role Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement; Protest procedures and dispute resolution process per 2 CFR 200.318(k).

The RFQ specifies the content of the SOQ, the number of copies required, due date, mailing address, and a physical address where the submittals may be hand-delivered if different from the mailing address. Two to four weeks is usually allowed between the time the RFQ is published and time that SOQs must be submitted. More time may be required for complex contracts or scope of work.

Items typically required in a statement of qualification include:
• Qualifications of key personnel (including consultant project manager) proposed for the contract. Key team members identified in the original proposal/cost proposal must not change (be different than) in the executed contract;
• Staff resumes;
• Related projects that key personnel have worked on;
• Qualifications/experience of the firm;
• Organizational chart;
• Forecast or Schedule of work;
• Consultant DBE Commitment document, see Exhibit 10-O1: Consultant Proposal DBE 231
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Commitment;
232
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• References.

Financial Management and Accounting System Requirements The LPA must ensure that Consultant contract solicitation and advertising documents (RFQs) clearly specify that contracts must not be awarded to a consultant without an adequate financial management and accounting system as required by 48 CFR 16.301-3, 2 CFR 200, and 48 CFR

31. The LPA must ensure the selected consultants have adequate financial management systems as required by the applicable federal regulations.

Advertise for Consultants
The solicitation process for consultant services must be by public advertisement or any other public forum or method that assures qualified in-State and out-of-State consultants are given a fair opportunity to be considered for award of contract. The RFQ must contain sufficient project work information, so that interested consultants can submit an appropriate SOQ.

Advertisements for RFQ may take one of two approaches. The most common is an advertisement or publication of the RFQ in a major newspaper of general circulation, technical publication of widespread circulation, professional associations and societies, recognized DBE organizations, web hosting or clearing houses known for posting contract solicitations such as Bid Sync, PlanetBids, or posting the RFQ on other widely used websites. To document website postings, the LPA should retain copies of screen shots displaying the posted begin/end dates.

In the second approach, the LPA advertises the availability of the RFQ in a major newspaper of general circulation, technical publications of widespread circulation, professional associations and societies, recognized DBE organizations, or through a web hosting or clearing houses known for posting contract solicitations such as Bid Sync or PlanetBids, and requests that interested consultants send a letter of interest to the LPA for the RFQ. The RFQs must then be sent to those firms who indicated interest in the RFQ. In some cases, it may be desirable to advertise nationwide for a particular project or service. This approach provides a registry for firms who received the RFQ and therefore facilitates the broadcast of any revisions or addenda to the RFQ, if necessary.

Issue/Publish RFQ
The LPA must publish the RFQ online and also issue the RFQ to all consultants responding to newspaper advertisement. The LPA must keep a record of all consultants that have downloaded the RFQ online as well as those receiving an RFQ through other means, to ensure that any inquiry responses, addendums, or amendments to the RFQ are given to all consultants that received the RFQ.

Receive/Evaluate Statements of Qualifications and Develop Shortlist The first step in the evaluation process is to determine that each SOQ contains all forms and other information required by the RFQ. Otherwise, the submittals may be considered nonresponsive and rejected without evaluation. Late submittals, submittals to the wrong location, and submittals with inadequate copies are considered nonresponsive and must be rejected. Submittal of additional information after the due date must not be allowed.

Documentation of when each proposal was received must be maintained in the project files. 233
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Copies of date stamped envelope covers or box tops are recommended. 234
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Minimum of three proposals must be received and evaluated. If only two proposals are received, a justification must be documented to proceed with the procurement. If only one proposal is received, a Non-Competitive process must be justified, and an Exhibit 12-F must be documented and signed by the DLAE. In either case, the re-advertisement of the RFP should be considered as an option.

The consultant selection committee reviews the submitted SOQ according to the published evaluation criteria and weighting factors. The committee makes an independent random check of one or more of the consultant’s references. This check applies to major subconsultants also.

The committee establishes a shortlist of consultants who are considered to be best qualified to perform the contract work. The shortlist includes enough qualified consultants to ensure that at least three consultants are interviewed.

Notify Consultants of Shortlist
All consultants that submitted an SOQ must be notified of the results of the review. The notification also identifies those consultants (short list) that will be requested to attend interviews if interviews were an option in the solicitation. Most consultants will request information as to why they were not placed on the shortlist. Therefore, the selection committee should keep notes because a particular consultant was not selected for the shortlist. When a consultant requests a debriefing, the reasons given for not being selected must be objective reasons. Consultants should not be compared with each other during the debriefing. Normally, the Contract Administrator does the debriefing; however, any member of the selection committee may be designated to do the debriefing.

Interview Top-Ranked Consultants
Each consultant to be interviewed is given a copy of the draft of the proposed contract, defining the detailed scope of work, and/or description of required services, and other information. This should be sent with the initial notification of the interview.

Between the time of the notification of the shortlist and interviews, the LPA may answer any questions concerning the scope of work to be contracted out, if not done earlier during the solicitation. In addition, the LPA may conduct additional reference checks for each consultant to be interviewed. Consultants should submit their questions about the RFQ and receive their answers from the LPA in writing. It is required that all consultants on the shortlist receive the questions and answers and are given the same information.

The committee should evaluate reference checks and other information that is gathered independently. Reference checks must be completed, and other information gathered before the interviews are conducted. If necessary, the results of the reference checks and other information may be discussed with the consultant at the interview.

Interviews are to be structured and conducted in a formal manner. Each consultant must be allowed the opportunity to make a presentation if desired; however, a time limit should be specified. Interview questions are prepared in advance.

Two types of questions may be asked:
• Questions that are to be asked of all competing consultants, and • Questions relating to each specific consultant, based upon the reference 235
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
checks, and the strengths and weaknesses identified during evaluation of the SOQ
236
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
The agency can request competing consultants to bring additional information or examples of their work to the interviews; if the additional information facilitates the interview or evaluation process. Additional information requested should be kept at a minimum, that is, only information required to select the most qualified consultant for the contract. The selection committee or LPA must not gather additional information concerning the consultants after the interviews are completed.

Develop Final Ranking and Notify Consultants of Results All consultants interviewed must be informed about the final ranking of consultants. It is important that all competing consultants receive the same information.

Most consultants will request information as to why they were not selected as the most qualified.

Therefore, the selection committee should keep notes as to why a particular consultant was not selected. When a consultant requests debriefing, the reasons for not being selected must be objective. Consultants should not be compared with each other or provided with information about other consultants during the debriefing.

Normally, the Contract Administrator does the debriefing; however, any member of the selection committee may be designated to do the debriefing. The next two sections provide guidance when the RFQ is solicited for specialized services and additional information is required prior to cost negotiations with consultant. For on-call contracts, skip the next two sections and begin Negotiation phase.

Conduct Scoping Meeting
The Contract Administrator should meet with the first-ranked consultant’s project manager to review the project, and to ensure that the consultant has a complete understanding of the work that is required. The consultant is shown as much material as is available regarding the project.

Any technical questions regarding the project are answered for the consultant.

Request Cost Proposal
The first-ranked consultant is asked to provide a cost proposal to perform the work described in the draft contract and discussed at the scoping meeting. The work is to be performed according to the conditions described in the draft contract using the payment method described therein.

Alternatively, if time is of the essence and it can be justified, sealed cost proposals may be requested from all of the consultants on the shortlist.

If the contract involves more than one project, the consultant must provide a separate cost proposal for each project in addition to a summary cost proposal for the total contract. If the contract involves milestones, the consultant must furnish a separate cost proposal for each milestone with a summary cost proposal for the total costs. If the contract involves subconsultants, the prime consultant must include a separate cost proposal for each subconsultant. Each subconsultant’s cost proposal must follow the same format as the prime consultant’s cost proposal.

Negotiate Contract with Top-Ranked Consultant
Cost proposals (for both Prime and all Subconsultant), and contract audit and review documents such as Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System and Financial Document Review Request forms, whichever applicable (see Section 10.1.3: A&E Consultant 237
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Audit and Review Process), will be submitted in a separate sealed envelope. Typically, the cost 238
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
proposals are submitted by the short-listed consultants only, at time of interview. However, if time is of the essence and it can be justified, or if no interviews are planned, the cost proposal can be requested from all consultants with their statements of qualification.

After the top-ranked consultant submits a sealed cost proposal, the LPA reviews the cost proposal and compares it with the LPA’s confidential detailed independent cost estimate and enters into negotiations. The goal of negotiation is to agree on a final contract that delivers to the LPA the services or products required at a fair and reasonable cost. The independent cost estimate, developed by the LPA in advance of requesting a cost proposal from the top-ranked consultant, is an important basis and tool for negotiations.

Negotiations should commence with the most qualified consultant. If agreement on a fair and reasonable price cannot be reached, negotiations should then be formally terminated.

Negotiations then proceed to the next most qualified consultant, and so on. Each consultant’s cost proposal must remain sealed until negotiations commence with that particular consultant.

At the completion of successful cost negotiations, all remaining sealed envelopes containing cost proposals must be returned to consultants.

Cost proposals in electronic form must be submitted separately from the RFQ and contained in a secure database that is inaccessible to the members involved in the A&E consultant contract procurement process. Only the cost proposal of the most qualified consultant will be requested to be sent to the members. Cost proposals of unsuccessful consultants are confidential and must not be opened by the LPA or any private entity that the LPA uses to store the cost proposals. Any concealed cost proposals of the unsuccessful consultants must be returned unopened or properly disposed of by permanently deleting the cost proposals in accordance with LPA’s written policies and procedures.

A contract audit and review may be required (see Section 10.1.3: A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process earlier in this chapter). LPA Contract Administrator is responsible for the submittal of all required documentations to Caltrans IOAI in a timely fashion, including all documents for a Financial Review, if applicable. Caltrans IOAI will not proceed with a Financial Review until all required documentation is completed correctly and submitted. Negotiations may be completed after receipt of the Caltrans IOAI Financial Review Letter. An indirect cost audit may be performed within the record retention period of the contract.

The items typically negotiated include:
• Work plan;
• Staffing plan;
• Schedule (including contract begin and end dates);
• Products to be delivered;
• Classification, wage rates, and experience level of personnel to be assigned; • Cost items, payments, and fee. Fee is required to be negotiated as a separate element.
239
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
The consultant’s ICR is not a negotiable item. A lower rate cannot be negotiated by the LPA.

For on-call contracts, typically a price agreement is reached based on specific rate of compensation for the term of the contract. The subsequent task orders (or mini agreements for 240
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
individual project work) is negotiated based on cost plus fee, or lump sum, which is derived from the wage rates agreed upon earlier for the on-call contract.

Before executing the consultant contract, the LPA must review the contract to ensure that all federal and state requirements have been met, and receive Caltrans IOAI’s Financial Review acceptance letter, if applicable.

Prior to contract award, or after contract award but no later than the first invoice, the LPA must submit a completed A&E Consultant Contract form for all new federal-funded A&E consultant contracts using the database at
https://dla.dot.ca.gov/fmi/webd/AE%20Consultant%20Contract%20Form (please use Firefox or Chrome if not supported by your browser).

If there are any changes to the contract after submittal of the A&E Consultant Contract form, refer to Section 10.1.8: Contract Amendments.

10.1.7 CONSULTANT SELECTION USING THE TWO-STEP RFQ/RFP METHOD Combined RFQ and RFP
Selecting consultants using the Two-Step RFQ/RFP method requires combining certain steps from each of the other two methods previously described. The consultants are rated based upon both their qualifications and their technical proposals. This procurement procedure involves a two-step process with issuance of a request for qualifications (RFQ) whereby responding consultants are evaluated and ranked based on qualifications and an RFP is then provided to three or more of the most highly qualified consultants. The two-step method leads to an executed project specific contract.

A different process may also be used that includes assessing minimum qualifications of consultants to perform services under general work categories or areas of expertise through a prequalification process whereby annual statements of qualifications and performance data are encouraged. These consultants are not ranked, and an RFP must be submitted to the entire list for evaluation and consideration. Regardless of any process utilized for prequalification of consultants or for an initial assessment of a consultant's qualifications under a RFQ, an RFP specific to the project, task, or service is required for evaluation of a consultant's specific technical approach and qualifications.

The initial steps in this method (up to the development and notification of the shortlist) are similar to the steps followed when using the One-Step RFQ method. At this point, the consultants from the shortlist are issued an additional RFP. The remaining steps are the same as the later steps followed in the One-Step RFP method. The combination of these steps is indicated in Figure 10-4: Consultant Selection Flowchart. Because it is a combination of the One-Step RFQ and One-Step RFP methods, this method of consultant selection requires more work and time than the other two methods. Consequently, the combined RFQ/RFP method is recommended for use only when the scope of work is not clearly known, very complex, or unusual.

The Two-Step RFQ/RFP is also well-suited for procuring multiple on-call contracts through a single solicitation (see Section 10.1.2 Determine Type of Contract). The outcome of the first step RFQ will be multiple contracts, or on-call list of consultants. For multiple on-call contracts, project work will be procured through subsequent competition or mini-RFPs amongst the on-call 241
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
consultants.
242
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
LPAs may also use the Two-Step RFQ/RFP method to:

1. Develop and maintain a pre-qualified file/list of consultant firms by specific work categories or areas of expertise. This list includes all consultants that meet the minimum published pass/fail requirements. The pre-qualified list can be updated annually or at least every two years and must be maintained by the agency. This list has not gone through the evaluation process.

2. Create a short list of evaluated and ranked consultants that leads to executed contracts Because it is a combination of the One-Step RFQ and One-Step RFP methods, this method of consultant selection requires more work and time than the other two methods. Consequently, the combined RFQ/RFP method is recommended for use when the scope of work is very complex or unusual.

Categorize work
Descriptions of the categories of work, deliverables, and the minimum qualification standards for each category must be clearly identified.

The LPA may prequalify consulting firms in the following (or more) categories:
• Roadway Design
• Bridge Design
• Bridge Inspection
• Traffic Engineering
• Environmental Services
• Roadway Construction Inspection and Administration
• Landscape Architecture
• Land Surveying
• Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)
• Federal–aid Highway Project Development Support Services Establish Minimum Qualifications
In an effort to ensure quality performance and results, a consultant should be required to meet certain minimum qualifications to be eligible for consideration in the pre-qualification process.

General criteria guidelines should be established for consultant selection for a pre-qualified list.

The criteria may be established by an individual or a panel of subject matter experts for the specific task of developing the criteria. Some agencies also establish appropriate weights for each criterion. It may be necessary to modify the criteria to fit specific cases. When a RFQ is published, it should state the criteria that will be used in the selection process. 243
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Criteria for evaluating statements of qualifications, may include but are not limited to:
• Special expertise and experience of the firm’s key employees • Proposed staffing (include number of licensed and specialized staff) for the project and previous experience of those identified
244
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• Experience of the firm and their personnel on previous projects similar to the one under consideration
• Consultant DBE Commitment document (see Exhibit 10-O1) • Professional references by the firm with the LPA
• Understanding of the project by the firm as demonstrated by their approach to organizing and management of the work
• Current workload of the firm and their ability to meet the proposed project schedule • Quality of previous performance by the firm with the LPA • Use of sub-consultants to accomplish work on the project • Equipment the firm has available and proposes to use as compatibility with ComputerAided Drafting and Design (CADD) and other equipment proposed to be used in accomplishing the work
• Familiarity with federal, state, and local codes, requirements, standards, and procedure • Examples of minimum qualifications for work categories above are provided here based on Caltrans best practices
Issue RFQ
The need for services of a consulting firm may be advertised in appropriate national, state, and local publications and web sites. Notices can also be sent to firms known to be qualified to do specific work, to professional societies, and to recognized Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) organizations. The advertisements and notices seek statements of interest and qualifications from consultants who are interested in the project. The DBE goal is established at the master on-call contract and included in the solicitation document.

The SOQ should list consulting firm details, names of principals, office locations, personnel by discipline, project experience and examples, current workload, types of service the firms are qualified to perform, and previous performance. Also, resumes of key persons, specialists, and other associates that may be assigned to the project or projects should be included. This information should be the basis for evaluating and placing a consulting firm on a general prequalification list.

Federal regulations require that any procedures related to pre-qualifying consultants cannot restrict competition.

Pre-qualification of consultants may be allowed as a condition for submitting a technical proposal for a contract only if the period between the date of the issuance of the RFP and the deadline for submitting a technical proposal affords sufficient time to enable a consultant to obtain pre-qualification status.

Another practice is to qualify consultants on a project-by-project basis. This is accomplished for some agencies by advertising or publishing notices in national, state, and local publications for needed services for specific, individual projects. These notices include a precise project location, a defined preliminary scope of services to be performed, a specific schedule within which the work is to be completed, and a list of products and deliverables to be provided by the consultant. Specific project advertisements usually are published when the proposed project is 245
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
large and complex, in-house resources are not available, special expertise is required, or the objectivity of an outside authority is desired.

Appropriate Federal-aid requirements should be complied with on Federal-aid projects.

Set-Up Evaluation Process
The first step in the evaluation process is to determine that each SOQ contains all forms, qualifications, and other information required by the RFQ. Otherwise, the submittals may be considered nonresponsive and rejected without evaluation. Documentation of when each SOQ was received must be maintained in the project files. Copies of date stamped envelope covers or box tops are recommended.

If all required information is not provided, a SOQ may be considered nonresponsive and rejected without evaluation. Late submittals, submittals to the wrong location, or submittals with inadequate copies are considered nonresponsive and must be rejected. Submittal of additional information after the due date must not be allowed.

The LPA must establish a process by which SOQs are evaluated and consultants who are deemed meeting the minimum qualifications are accepted and placed on a per-qualified list.

Whether the LPA has a “committee” of experts evaluating the SOQs or individuals responsible for the evaluation, the process must be well-defined, open, and transparent. The prequalification process must also allow for consultants to be re-evaluated in cases of denials. The LPA must specify how long the pre-qualified list lasts, not to exceed two years. Federal regulation recommends refreshing the SOQs on an annual basis.

LPA Contract Administrator ensures that all committee members meet the conflict-of-interest requirements (23 CFR 172) by completing and signing a conflict-of-interest statement prior to selection process initiation. A sample conflict of interest form is provided in Exhibit 10-T.

Evaluate Qualifications and Add Firm to List
All SOQs received should first be reviewed for completeness. Each response must contain all required forms and any other information requested in the advertisement. The response may be considered incomplete and rejected without further evaluation if all required information is not provided or if the submittal is late.

The qualifications of all responding firms are then reviewed according to established evaluation criteria or factors. The agency then establishes a short list of at least three consultants that are determined to be the most highly qualified to perform the required work. Firms not selected should be notified in writing.

Maintain List
Pre-qualification of a consultant expires in two years. Pre-qualified consultants must renew their pre-qualification status every two years. Firms can apply to be on the list at any time. After a period of two years, firms should re-apply (repeat the process of submitting SOQs) to be on the list. In addition to the required two-year renewal process, the consultant should also be required to update the firm’s organizational structure within one year when there is a corporate/affiliate change, ownership control, type of work expertise, capacity, or any other major change. 246
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
If the consultant does not meet the minimum requirements and their SOQ is rejected, the committee must respond to the consultant explaining the reason for their rejection. The 247
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
consultant is allowed to reapply to be on the list again provided the reasons for rejection are corrected.

The list of qualified firms can be maintained online through the agency’s website. Firms can also apply to be on the list through the agency website for ease of operation.

Issue RFP to Pre-Qualified Consultants on List
An RFP is sent to the short-listed firms. The RFP should indicate the content of the technical proposal, technical review procedures, anticipated schedule of activities, scope of work, project description, where the technical proposals are to be delivered, the number of copies required, and the due date.

Some agencies receive the technical proposal orally as part of an interview conducted for this purpose. In these cases, written documentation may not be required.

Items typically required in a technical proposal include:
• Work plan
• Organization plan
• Schedule for meeting time frame
• Available computer equipment and programs
• Staffing plan and resumes including sub-consultants
• Pre-award audit/financial package information (if deemed appropriate) • Examples of similar work previously completed
• Sub-consultants, DBE, their proposed participation, and other related information Conduct Proposer’s Conference or Answer Written Questions The LPA may allow for clarification of the RFP by inviting submittal of written questions or by conducting a proposer’s conference, or by doing both. The LPA must publish or mail their responses to any written questions to all consultants receiving the RFP. No response should be given to verbal questions. It is important that all competing consultants receive the same information. If a proposer’s conference is to be held, the exact time and place must be specified in the RFP. Attendance at a proposer’s conference normally is not mandatory. However, consultants not attending the conference do not receive notes from the meeting unless they request the notes.

Receive and Evaluate Technical Proposals
The Contract Administrator must verify that each technical proposal contains all forms and other information required by the RFP. If all required information is not provided, a technical proposal may be considered nonresponsive and rejected without evaluation. Late submittals, submittals to the wrong location, or submittals with inadequate copies are considered nonresponsive and must be rejected. Submittal of additional information after the due date must not be allowed.

Documentation of when each technical proposal was received must be maintained in the project 248
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
files. Copies of date stamped envelope covers or box tops are recommended.

A consultant selection committee with a minimum of three members is appointed at the beginning of the consultant selection process. The members of the consultant selection 249
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
committee must evaluate each technical proposal according to the technical criteria listed in the RFP. A minimum of three technical proposals must be received and evaluated.

If only two technical proposals are received, a justification must be documented to proceed with the procurement. If only one technical proposal is received, a Non-Competitive process must be justified, and an Exhibit 12-F must be documented. In either case, the re-advertisement of the RFP should be considered as an option.

The committee must also evaluate reference checks and other information gathered independently. Reference checks must be completed, and other information gathered before the interviews are conducted. If necessary, the results of the reference checks or other information may be discussed with the highest ranked qualified consultants at the interviews.

Develop Final Ranking and Notify Consultants of Results The selection committee discusses and documents the strengths and weaknesses of each technical proposal, interviews the three or more highest ranked consultants (shortlisted), and develops a final ranking of the highest ranked consultants. All consultants that submitted technical proposals must be informed about the final ranking of consultants. It is important that all competing consultants receive the same information.

Most consultants will request information as to why they were not the highest ranked. Therefore, the selection committee should keep notes as to why a particular consultant was not selected.

When a consultant requests debriefing, the reasons for not being selected must be objective reasons. The consultant should not be compared to others and should not be provided with information about other consultants during this debriefing. Normally, the Contract Administrator does the debriefing; however, any member of the selection committee may be designated to do the debriefing.

Request Cost Proposal and Negotiate Contract with Top-Ranked Consultant The first-ranked consultant is asked to provide a cost proposal to perform the work described in the draft contract and discussed at the scoping meeting. The work is to be performed according to the conditions described in the draft contract using the payment method described therein.

Alternatively, if time is of the essence and it can be justified, sealed cost proposals may be requested from all of the consultants on the shortlist.

If the contract involves more than one project, the consultant must provide a separate cost proposal for each project in addition to a summary cost proposal for the total contract. If the contract involves milestones, the consultant must furnish a separate cost proposal for each milestone with a summary cost proposal for the total costs. If the contract involves subconsultants, the prime consultant must include a separate cost proposal for each subconsultant. Each subconsultant’s cost proposal must follow the same format as the prime consultant’s cost proposal.

Cost proposals (for both prime and all subconsultants) and contract audit and review documents, such as Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System and Financial Document Review Request forms, whichever applicable (see Section 10.1.3: A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process), will be submitted in a separate sealed envelope.

After the top-ranked consultant submits a sealed cost proposal, the LPA reviews the cost proposal and enters into negotiations. The goal of negotiation is to agree on a final contract that 250
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
delivers to the LPA the services or products required at a fair and reasonable cost. The 251
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
independent cost estimate, developed by the LPA in advance of requesting a cost proposal from the top-ranked consultant, is an important basis and tool for negotiations.

Negotiations should commence with the most qualified consultant. If agreement on a fair and reasonable price cannot be reached, negotiations should then be formally terminated.

Negotiations then proceed to the next most qualified consultant, and so on. Each consultant’s cost proposal must remain sealed until negotiations commence with that particular consultant.

At the completion of successful cost negotiations, all remaining sealed envelopes containing cost proposals must be returned to consultants.

A contract audit and review may be required (see Section 10.1.3: A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process). The LPA Contract Administrator is responsible for the submittal of all required documentations to Caltrans IOAI in a timely fashion, including all documents for a Conformance Review, if applicable. Negotiations may be completed after receipt of the Caltrans IOAI Conformance Letter. An indirect cost audit may be performed within the record retention period of the contract.

Items typically negotiated include:
• Work plan
• Schedule and deadlines (for deliverables and final duration of contract) • Products to be delivered
• Classification, wage rates, and experience level of personnel to be assigned • Other Direct Cost items, and profit or fee
The consultant’s ICR is not a negotiable item. A lower rate cannot be negotiated by the LPA.

The LPA and the consultant will agree on the final cost proposal and incorporate into final contract.

Before executing the consultant contract, the LPA must review the contract to ensure that all federal and state requirements have been met.

10.1.8 COMPLETING THE PROJECT
Develop the Final Contract
The Contract Administrator requests a revised cost proposal from the consultant after:
(1) negotiations have been completed, (2) the LPA and consultant have agreed to a fair and reasonable price, and (3) a letter, if applicable, is released by Caltrans IOAI that accepts, denies, or makes an adjustment to the proposed ICR. The Contract Administrator should review the revised cost proposal to ensure that all the items and changes discussed during negotiation were included. This revised cost proposal then becomes the final cost proposal and is attached to and made a part of the consultant contract. Sample contract language and format have been included as Exhibit 10-R: A&E Boilerplate Agreement Language.

The Contract Administrator has responsibility to ensure that the final negotiated contract is complete and has verified that all required backup documents have been provided. Copies of 252
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
the contract are sent to the consultant for signature first. 253
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Review and Approval of Contracts
Proposed contracts for consultant services (including subcontracted work) must be reviewed by the LPA to verify that:
• Compensation is fair and reasonable and includes prevailing wage rates, if applicable; • Work activities and schedules are consistent with the nature and scope of the project; • DBE goal Exhibit 10-O2: Consultant Contract DBE Commitment is included for all contracts regardless of goal;
• Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (for Prime and Subs) and Financial Document Review Request forms and all supporting documents, if applicable (contracts at or above $1 Million), have been submitted to Caltrans IOAI; • If applicable, adjustment or denial of the ICR identified in the Financial Review Letter have been included in the final cost proposal;
• A&E Consultant Contract database must be used to ensure that required documentation has been provided;
• A cost proposal must include the costs of materials, direct salaries, payroll additions, other direct costs, indirect costs, fees, and backup calculations.

Before approving a contract for consulting services, the Contract Administrator must be satisfied that the consultant’s organization:
• Is qualified to perform the services required;
• Is in a position, considering other work commitments, to provide competent and experienced personnel to perform the services in the time allowed; • Is fully aware of all applicable federal and state laws including implementing regulations, design standards, specifications, previous commitments that must be incorporated into the design of the project, and administrative controls including those of Caltrans and FHWA.
• Has an adequate financial management system as required by the applicable federal regulations.
• Is not disbarred or suspended from state or federally-funded contracts. Per 23 CFR 172.7(b)(3) “A contracting agency shall verify suspension and debarment actions and eligibility status of consultants and subconsultants prior to entering into an agreement or contract in accordance with 2 CFR 1200 and 2 CFR 180.”
The contract must provide for a defined level of acceptability and a statement to the effect that the consultant may be required to modify its work as necessary; to meet that level of acceptability as defined in the contract. The contract must provide for LPA reviews at appropriate stages during performance of the work, to determine if any changes or other actions are warranted.

The contract must provide that the consultant and subconsultants must maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other information pertaining to costs incurred.

Such materials must be available for inspection and audit by federal, State, and LPA authorized 254
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
representatives; and copies thereof must be furnished, if requested. 255
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Following final settlement of the contract accounts with the State or FHWA, such records and documents may be archived at the option of the LPA and must be retained for a three-year period after processing of the final voucher by FHWA.

Execute Contract and Issue Notice to Proceed to Consultant The Contract Administrator sends the consultant a fully executed copy of the contract with an original signature and issues a notice to proceed. Funds may not be used to reimburse the agency for any work or costs incurred before the Authorization to Proceed is issued, or for consultant costs incurred prior to the execution of the consultant contract. All executed on-call contracts must have a begin and end date. All executed project-specific or multiphase contracts must have a begin date and should have an end date prior to the Project End Date. Work performed after the Project End Date is not eligible for reimbursement; see LAPM Chapter 3.

LPA consultant selection and contract execution costs may be reimbursable.

For on-call contracts, a fully executed copy of the contract with original signatures will be sent to the consultant. Each subsequent task order (for individual project) will be accompanied with a copy of the signed task order and a Notice to Proceed, once it is negotiated and approved. Task order expiration dates must not exceed the Master On-call agreement end date.

Administer the Contract
Project work begins as specified in the contract after the notice to proceed is issued to the consultant. Thereafter, the LPA manages and administers the contract to ensure that a complete and acceptable product is received on time, within standards, and within budget and terms of the contract.

Contract administration activities help to ensure that contractual obligations are completed satisfactorily. Generally, these activities include:
• Monitoring project progress and compliance with contract requirements; • Receiving, reviewing, and assessing reports, plans, and other required products/ deliverables;
• Receiving and reviewing state prevailing wages (see Department of Industrial Relations websites below):
o DIR FAQ website: http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/FAQ_PrevailingWage.html o DIR Wage Determination website:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/oprl/DPreWageDetermination.htm
• Reviewing invoices to ensure costs claimed are in accordance to the method of payment and contract cost proposal, approving payments;
• If new consultant personnel are added or substituted, labor rates must be verified prior to approving invoices.
• Record keeping and reporting;
• Controlling costs;
• Identifying changes to the scope of work and preparation of amendments (must ensure that any changes to the scope is within the constraints of the original RFP/RFQ; 256
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• Completing the consultant performance evaluations (see Exhibit 10-S: Consultant Performance Evaluation).

Substitution of Consultant Personnel and Subconsultants After contract execution the consultant should not substitute key personnel (project manager and others listed by name in the cost proposal) or subconsultants without prior written approval from the LPA. Refer to LAPM Chapter 9: Civil Rights & Disadvantaged Business Enterprise and 49 CFR 26 for DBE substitution requirements. To do so can result in the costs being ineligible for federal or state reimbursement. The consultant must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from the LPA prior to use of a different subconsultant on the contract.

The proposed substituted person must be as qualified as the original, and at the same or lower cost. For engineering types of consultant contracts, the consultant’s project manager must be a registered engineer in the State of California.

Invoicing (or Progress Payments)
The frequency and format of the invoices/progress payments are to be determined by the contract. Program Supplement Agreements (see LAPM Chapter 3: Project Authorization) need to have been prepared prior to any payments being requested. Payments to the consultant are to be in arrears. In other words, the consultant must have actually incurred and paid the costs before invoicing the LPA.

For federal reimbursement of consultant costs on a project, the LPA must submit the following to the DLAE, for each consultant or consulting firm used on the project (failure to do so will result in the consultant’s invoices for reimbursement being returned to the agency unprocessed):
• Copy of Executed Consultant contract;
• Exhibit 10-O1: Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment
• Exhibit 10-O2: Consultant Contract DBE Commitment
• Copy of issued task order and Exhibit 10-O2 for the task order for on-call contracts.

DLAE must confirm that the LPA has submitted copies of the Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System form (for Prime and Subconsultants) to Caltrans IOAI and that LPA has submitted the A&E Consultant Contract form to Caltrans.

The LPA is to follow the procedures given in LAPM Chapter 5: Invoicing, to obtain reimbursement of federal or state funds.

Contract Amendments
Contract amendments are required to modify the terms of the original contract for changes such as extra time, added work, or increased costs. Only work within the original advertised scope of services must be added by amendment to the contract. The addition of work outside the original advertised scope will make that work ineligible for federal or state reimbursement (see Q&As). 257
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
There is no prescribed format for contract amendments. They may take the form of letter-type agreements meeting the legal requirements of the LPA, clearly outlining the changes and 258
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
containing a mutually agreed-upon method of compensation. Such agreements must conform to the requirements of this manual with regard to payment.

A consultant contract may be amended at any time prior to the expiration date of the original contract. The most common amendment is to extend the ending date of the contract. All contract amendments must be fully executed before the ending date of the contract by formal amendment. Failure to amend a contract prior to the ending date will make the subsequent costs ineligible for federal and state reimbursement. Task orders are not considered an amendment and therefore not appropriate to extend the terms of the contract.

All contract amendments must be negotiated following the same procedures as the negotiation of the original contract and must be in writing and fully executed by the consultant and LPA before reimbursable work begins on the amendment. For any additional engineering and design related services outside of the scope of work established in the original solicitation, a contracting agency must either procure the series under a new solicitation, perform the work itself using agency staff, or use a different, existing contract under which the services would be within the scope of work. Overruns in the costs of the work must not automatically warrant an increase in the fixed fee portion of a cost-plus-fixed fee reimbursed contract. Permitted changes to the scope of work or duration may warrant consideration for adjustment of the fixed fee portion of cost-plus-fixed fee or lump sum reimbursed contracts. If an emergency exists of such magnitude that a delay cannot be tolerated, the LPA and the consultant may agree on an amendment initiating the work, so that reimbursable work may begin. The initiating amendment is then followed by a final amendment once the full scope of the emergency work is known and agreed to by both parties. In both cases, sufficient funding should be included in the amendments to pay for all work to be performed by the consultant. The final amendment must be executed as quickly as possible. Failure to fully comply with this section may result in the loss of LPA funding. Section 10.1.3: A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process of this chapter must apply to the entire contract and must be completed prior to execution of the contract amendment. For contracts greater than or equal to $1 Million, submit the Financial Document Review Request form to IOAI for all amendments on consultant/subconsultant's name change, amending an ICR, or adding new subconsultant's ICR. ICRs that have not been accepted by IOAI are not eligible for federal or state reimbursement. For contracts with original amounts under $1 Million but subsequently became greater than or equal to $1 Million after amendment, IOAI Financial Document Review is not required. If there are any changes to the contract after submittal of the A&E Consultant Contract form, the LPA must submit an amended form to the database prior to the first invoice after the contract has been amended. Submission of the A&E Consultant Contract form is not required for non-A&E consultant contracts. All amendments must incorporate any current requirements of the federal regulations including the federal fiscal provisions and submit the A&E Consultant Contract form to the database prior to the first invoice after the contract has been amended (please use Firefox or Chrome if not supported by your browser).

Performance Evaluation
Pursuant to 23 CFR 172.9(d)(2) agencies are required to prepare an evaluation of the consultant when the project has been completed. The Contract Administrator evaluates the consultant’s performance after the consultant’s final report has been submitted, and the Contract Administrator has conducted a detailed evaluation with the consultant’s project manager. See Exhibit 10-S: Consultant Performance Evaluation for a suggested format for use 259
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
by the LPA.
260
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Project Records
Federal-Aid Highway Program funding recipients and sub-recipients must maintain adequate and readily accessible project performance and financial records, supporting documents, and other records considered pertinent to the grant agreement and in compliance with federal laws and regulations (e.g., 23 USC 112; 40 USC 1101-1104, 23 CFR 172, 48 CFR 31, and 2 CFR 200). These records must be maintained for a minimum of three (3) years following issuance of the final voucher from FHWA (forwarded by Caltrans) and the closure of all other pending matters (2 CFR 200.333).

For audit purposes, project records and documentation must be kept for three (3) years after payment of the final federal or state voucher. Among the records to be retained are as follows (not an all-inclusive list):
• Copies of RFPs and RFQs, changes, addendums, etc. and bidder’s list; • Documentation of DBE participation (including Exhibit 10-O1: Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment, Exhibit 10-O2: Consultant Contract DBE Commitment), Exhibit 10-G:

Individual A&E Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet, Exhibit 17-F: Final Report – Utilization of DBE and First-Tier Subcontractors or Exhibit 17-F1: Final Report-Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) for On-Call Contracts, and Exhibit 17-O: DBE Certification Status Change.
• Solicitation and advertisement records;
• Identification of selection committee members;
• Record of receiving proposals, statement of qualifications; • Evaluation and ranking records such as original score sheets from all panel members, short list questions, and other documentation (see Exhibit 10-B: Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet);
• Independent cost estimate (prepared in advance of requesting a cost proposal from the top-ranked consultant);
• Record of negotiations (to include a separate negotiation of profit in accordance with federal guidelines);
• Financial Review Letter and Cognizant Agency Letter, when applicable; • CPA-audited ICR Audit Report or Approved State DOT Cognizant Indirect Rate Letter, if any;
• Consultant Certification of Costs and Financial Management (Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System form) for contracts at or above $1 Million; • A&E Consultant Audit Request Letter and Checklist (Financial Document Review Request form) for contracts at or above $1 Million and all supporting documentation. • Executed consultant contracts, cost proposals, and amendments (see Exhibit 10-R: A&E Boilerplate Agreement Language);
• Contract oversight and progress meeting documents;
• Progress and final payments, and supporting documentation; 261
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• Performance evaluation (see Exhibit 10-S: Consultant Performance Evaluation); 262
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• A&E Consultant Contract form (see A&E Consultant Contract database); • Accounting records documenting compliance with State and federal administrative requirements;
• Certifications and Conflict of Interest forms (Exhibit 10-T: Conflict of Interest & Confidentiality Statement, all personnel involved in the procurement of the agreement should complete Exhibit 10-T, Exhibit 10-U: Consultant in Management Support Role Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement, and Exhibit 10-Q: Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, as appropriate). Exhibit 10-Q is included in the solicitation and must be completed if the consultant needs to disclose any lobbying activities.

Retention Clauses
At the option of the LPA, a retention clause may be included in the consultant contract. A retention clause in the consultant contract is recommended (see Exhibit 10-R: A&E Boilerplate Agreement Language, Article VIII).

Review of Local Public Agency Actions
Federal-aid or state reimbursement is contingent on meeting the federal or state requirements and can be withdrawn, if these procedures are not followed and documented. The LPA files are to be maintained in a manner to facilitate future FHWA or Caltrans process reviews and audits.

As specified in the Review and Approval of Contracts above, the Contract Administrator must review the proposed consultant contract before execution.

The A&E Consultant Contract form is to be completed prior to award, or after contract award but no later than the first invoice. A copy of this form must be retained in the LPA project files.

10.1.9 Miscellaneous Considerations
Agreements with Other Governmental Agencies
Intergovernmental or inter-entity agreements are encouraged if appropriate. If another governmental agency is requested to do work or provide services to an agency, an interagency agreement is needed (2 CFR 200 and California Government Codes 10340 and 11256).

Small Purchase Contracts
Contracts that are less than $250,000 are considered small contracts in accordance with federal regulations. However, within the State of California, there is no recognized small purchase procedure and all A&E contracts are procured using qualifications-based selection and not cost.

For federal contracts that are less than $250,000 and are not anticipated to exceed this amount, the agency must use either Section 10.2: State-Only Funded A&E Contracts or the federal guidance for contracts greater than $250,000. If the contract is anticipated to exceed $250,000, use one of the accepted procurement procedures listed in the previous sections. Small contracts using the simplified acquisition procedure (State-Only funded section) must not exceed $250,000 or the additional costs are considered not reimbursable. The entire contract could also be considered ineligible by FHWA depending on circumstances. The scope of work, project phases, and contract requirements must not be broken down into smaller components to permit the use of small purchase procedure. DBE requirements apply for all federally-funded projects.
263
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Noncompetitive Negotiated Contracts (Sole-Source)
Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be used only when the award of a contract is infeasible under sealed bids or competitive proposals (23 CFR 172.7(a)(3)).

FHWA considers these types of contracts as Sole Source contracts and should be used only in very limited circumstances. An Exhibit 12-F prepared by the LPA and approved by Caltrans is required before establishing these services (23 CFR 172.7(a)(3); also see Exhibit 12-F: CostEffectiveness/Public Interest Finding/A&E Noncompetitive.

Conditions under which noncompetitive negotiated contracts may be acceptable include:
• Only one organization is qualified to do the work;
• An emergency exists of such magnitude that cannot permit delay; • Competition is determined to be inadequate after solicitation of a number of sources.

The LPA must:
• Follow its defined process for noncompetitive negotiation; • Develop an adequate scope of work, evaluation factors, and cost estimate before solicitation;
• Conduct negotiations to ensure a fair and reasonable cost.

The LPA must carefully document details of the special conditions, obtain Caltrans approval on the Exhibit 12-F and retain all documents in the project files for future Caltrans’ or FHWA’s review.

Retaining a Consultant in a Management Support Role (CMSR) An LPA may retain a qualified CMSR on its staff in professional capacities for federal-aid projects such as:
• A City Engineer (or equivalent) who manages the engineering unit for the city, providing oversight of a project, series of projects, managing or directing work of other consultants or contractors on behalf of the city.
• A County Engineer (or equivalent) who manages the engineering unit for the county such as duties described above.
• A Project Manager (or equivalent) who manages and oversees a project, series of projects, or the work of other consultants and contractors on behalf of the public agency. • A Program Manager (or equivalent) who manages and oversees an element of a highway program, function, or service on behalf of the public agency.

However, typically a CMSR is not:
• A consultant engineer performing project-specific design, and/or construction contract administration and construction engineering for the public agency. 264
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• A consultant providing support to administrative duties such as federal authorization process, labor compliance activities, and other management and administrative tasks. 265
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
The use of a CMSR should be limited to unique or very unusual situations. These situations require a thorough justification as to why the LPA cannot perform the management. Consultants used in management support roles must be selected using the same procedures as those for other consultants specified in this chapter. A CMSR funded by local or state funds must have approval from FHWA to be considered qualified to manage federal projects or consultants providing services on federal projects.

Eligibility for federal or state reimbursement for a CMSR requires the following:
• Compliance with the selection procedures specified in this chapter; • Existence of a contract between the LPA and the consultant specifying the LPA engineering services to be performed;
• Written designation by the LPA of the responsibilities and authority of the consultant as an agency engineer;
• For a federal-aid project, completion of Exhibit 10-T: Conflict of Interest & Confidentiality Statement by all members (both consultants and employees) prior to participating in the Architect & Engineering (A&E) Selection Panel pertaining to the specific selection process and the firms being considered;
• Selection of consultants for A&E management positions must be by the use of qualification-based selection procedures on an open and competitive basis resulting in a contract with defined beginning and ending dates not to exceed five (5) years; • For a federal-aid project, the LPA’s CMSR must not:
o Participate in, or exercise authority over the A&E selection process, if that consultant’s firm is one of the proposing firms, or subconsultant to a proposing firm;
o Participate in, or exercise authority over management of work performed by the consultant’s firm, or to a consultant’s firm of which the LPA consultant firm is a subconsultant. This would include, but not be limited to, managing or directing the work, approving changes in the schedule, scope, or deliverables; and approving invoices.
o Apply for or receive reimbursement of federal-aid funds for the LPA’s federal-aid project if either of the foregoing has occurred. However, reimbursement for the construction contract portion of the project will still be allowed provided all other federal-aid requirements have been met.
o Where benefiting more than a single federal-aid project, allocability of consultant contract costs for services related to a management support role must be distributed consistent with the cost principles applicable to the contracting agency in 23 CFR 172.7(b)(5).

If engineering services for a project are within the scope of the services described in the retained consultant’s contract, these services may be performed by the person or firm designated as an agency engineer. If the services are not within the scope, eligibility for federal reimbursement for these services require a new consultant contract to be developed using the selection procedures in this chapter. Retained consultants involved in the preparation of the RFP or RFQ must not be considered in the selection of consultants for the resulting project 266
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
specific work.
267
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
When a CMSR is procured with federal-aid funds, the LPA (subgrantee) must fully comply with the following:
• Subparagraphs of 2 CFR 200.318 maintain a contract administration system and maintain a written code of standards. No employee, officer, or agent of the subgrantee must participate in selection, or in the award or administration of a contract supported by federal funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. • Subparagraph of 23 CFR 172.7(b) requires that the LPA must receive approval from FHWA.
• Liability insurance should normally be required from the consultant (errors and omissions, etc.).

For federally-funded projects, LPAs that solicit to hire A&E consultant(s) in a management support role must obtain FHWA approval prior to contract execution.

In order for a contract for a CMSR to be federally eligible, the following are required prior to contract execution:
• The LPA must submit a request for approval via email, the Scope of Work (SOW) and Conflict of Interest (COI) Policy to the Division of Local Assistance-Headquarters (DLAHQ) at [email protected], prior to solicitation. • Once the LPA receives FHWA’s written response, the LPA may need to revise the documents reflecting FHWA’s opinions and can proceed with the RFQ. • After consultant selection, the LPA must submit the completed Exhibit 10-U: Consultant in Management Support Role Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement to the DLA-HQ at [email protected]. LPA will receive FHWA’s approved Exhibit 10-U via email.
268
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Figure 10-5: Consultant in a Management Support Role Flowchart Construction Engineering Services
Under federal-aid regulations and state policy, the primary responsibility for general supervision of construction must remain with the LPA. The LPA must also ensure that the work is performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, by employing or retaining as a consultant a registered engineer for construction engineering services on the project.

All construction engineering activities performed by a consultant must be under the overall supervision of a full-time employee of the agency who is in responsible charge. These activities may include preparation of contract change orders, construction surveys, foundation investigations, measurement, and computation of quantities, testing of construction materials, checking of shop drawings, preparation of estimates, reports, and other inspection activities necessary to ensure that the construction is being performed in accordance with the plans and specifications. The construction engineering consultant’s contract defines the relative authorities and responsibilities of the full-time employee of the LPA in charge of the project and the consultant’s construction engineering staff.

If a technical inspection consultant is to provide professional assistance to the LPA, a formal consultant contract must be executed which follows this chapter’s requirements. The contract 269
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
must provide for reviews at appropriate stages during performance of the work to determine if any changes or other actions are warranted. These reviews are to be made by the LPA. 270
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}

10.1.10 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
According to 23 CFR 172.5, LPAs are required to adopt written policies and procedures prescribed by Caltrans. As such, the LPA must adopt Caltrans Local Assistance Chapter 10:

Consultant Selection, which contain the A&E policies and procedures.

To meet this requirement, LPAs are required to email and provide one of the following documents to the DLA Office of Guidance and Oversight (OGO) at [email protected]:

1. A Board Resolution showing that the LPA is adopting Caltrans LAPM Chapter 10; OR

2. An official letter signed by the LPA’s Public Works Director or equivalent manager addressed to the DLA OGO Office Chief, stating that the agency is adopting Caltrans LAPM Chapter 10
The DLA A&E website includes an example of the adoption resolution and letter. These examples are for reference only; the appropriate language to be used is determined by the individual agency.

LPAs are responsible for providing all resources necessary for the procurement, management, and administration of A&E consultant contracts including subcontracts. Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable in accordance with the Federal cost principles and consistent with the contract terms as well as the acceptability and progress of the consultant's work; • Monitoring the consultant's work and compliance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the contract;
• Preparing a consultant's performance evaluation when services are completed and using such performance data in future evaluation and ranking of consultant to provide similar services;
• Closing-out a contract;
• Retaining supporting programmatic and contract records, as specified in 2 CFR 200.333 and the requirements of this part;
• Determining the extent to which the consultant, which is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and coordination of services, may be reasonably liable for costs resulting from errors and omissions in the work furnished under its contract; • Assessing administrative, contractual, or legal remedies in instances where consultants violate or breach contract terms and conditions, and providing for such sanctions and penalties as may be appropriate; and
• Resolving disputes in the procurement, management, and administration of engineering and design related consultant services.
271
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}

10.1.11 REFERENCES
2 CFR Part 200
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part-200?toc=1 2 CFR Part 215 Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2012-title2-vol1/CFR-2012-title2-vol1-part215/context 23 U.S.C. Letting of Contracts
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/title23usc.pdf
23 CFR 172
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-23/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-172 40 U.S.C.1104 Brooks Act
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2011-title40/USCODE-2011-title40-subtitleIchap11/context 41 CFR Public Contracts and Property Management
http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title41/41tab_02.tpl 41 U.S.C. Public Contracts
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2009-title41/html/USCODE-2009-title41.htm 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Subpart 15.404
https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-15
48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31
https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-31
48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 16 – Types of Contracts
https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-16
48 CFR 27, Chapter 1, Subpart 27.3 – Patent Rights under Government Contracts https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-27
48 CFR, Chapter 1, Subpart 31.201-3 – Determining Reasonableness 272
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-31
48 CFR, Chapter 99 – Cost Accounting Standards, Part 9904 https://www.acquisition.gov/chapter_99
49 CFR 26 Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs
http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title49/49cfr26_main_02.tpl American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Uniform Audit and Accounting Guide
https://audit.transportation.org/
Caltrans Division of Procurement and Contracts Website
http://www.dot.ca.gov/dpac/index.html
273
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
California Labor Code, Section 1775
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&sectionNum=1775 Government Auditing Standards (GAS) issued by the United States Government Accountability Office
http://www.gao.gov/yellowbook/overview
Government Code Sections 4525 through 4529.5 and Sections 4529.10 through 4529.20 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&division=5.&title=1.& part=&chapter=10.&article=
Standard Environmental Reference (SER)
http://www.dot.ca.gov/ser/
274
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}

10.2 STATE-ONLY FUNDED A&E CONTRACTS

10.2.1 GENERAL
LPAs are required to follow all applicable local and state regulations including those listed in LAPM Chapter 10 in accordance with their State Master Agreement. Although the requirements listed in this section are minimum requirements, the LPA must use good engineering judgment and best practices to document their processes and procedures when procuring A&E contracts utilizing qualifications-based selections. LPAs using local funds to procure an A&E Consultant on a state-only funded project and will not seek state reimbursement for consultant cost may choose not to follow the selection and contracting procedures detailed in Section 10.2 of this chapter.

All consultants must comply with 48 CFR 31: Contract Cost Principles and Procedures. Also, consultants and LPAs must comply with 2 CFR 200: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, excluding sections 200.318-200.326 Procurement Standards (reference Federal Highway Administration December 4, 2014 Memorandum Action: 2 CFR 200 Implementation Guidance).

Agency state-only funded (SOF) agreements must contain the required federal fiscal provisions from 2 CFR 200 in all Division of Local Assistance funded agreements. Exhibit 10-R: A&E Boilerplate Agreement Language contains 2 CFR 200 requirements and may also be used in SOF agreements. Depending upon the scope of work, the required contract provisions may need to include the California State Prevailing Wages.

All proposed A&E contracts and supporting documents (including state-only funded) are subject to audit or review by Caltrans’ Independent Office of Independent Office of Audits and Investigations (IOAI), other state audit organizations, or the federal government and required to follow LAPM Section 10.1.3 A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process.

For consultant contracts, procured with local or state funds, to provide services for federal-aid projects, or to oversee or manage other consultants providing these services, the Consultant in Management Support Role process must be completed to be eligible for reimbursement. Refer to Section 10.1.9 Miscellaneous Considerations: Retaining a Consultant as an Agency Engineer or in a Management Support Role.

DBE contract goals are not required for state-only funded contracts.

This guidance is for contracts utilizing state funds only. If any federal funds are added or reimbursed, the federal process must be followed.

Non-A&E consultant contracts reference Section 10.3: Non-A&E Contracts.

Reference: California Government Code Title 1, Division 5, Chapter 10, Contracts with Private Architects, Engineering, Land Surveying, and Construction Project Management Firms §4525- 4529.5.

10.2.2 DEFINITION OF A&E
275
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, and land surveying services includes those professional services of an architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, or land surveying nature as well as incidental services that members of these professions and those in their employ may logically or justifiably perform. 276
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Construction project management means those services provided by a licensed architect, registered engineer, or licensed general contractor. Any individual or firm proposing to provide construction project management services must provide evidence that the individual or firm and its personnel carrying out onsite responsibilities have expertise and experience in construction project design review and evaluation, construction mobilization and supervision, bid evaluation, project scheduling, cost-benefit analysis, claims review and negotiation, and general management and administration of a construction project.

Environmental services mean those services performed in connection with project development and permit processing in order to comply with federal and state environmental laws.

Reference: California Government Code §4527

10.2.3 MINIMUM AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
A. Written Procedures
Local agencies shall follow the minimum requirements listed below in addition to any local laws and regulations.

Reference: California Government Code §4526
B. Conflict of Interest
The LPA must develop and maintain a written code of conduct governing the performance of its employees engaged in the award and administration of state-funded contracts, including the prevention of conflicts of interest.

References:

California Government Code §4526
California Government Code §1090
California Government Code §4529.12
C. Records
Local agencies shall keep adequate records of all contracts including the procurement, project management, accounting, and financial administration.

References:

California Government Code §4529.14
California Government Code §4006
D. Full & Open Competition
All A&E contracts shall be procured through a qualifications-based selection utilizing open and fair competition. Evaluate at least three consultants using published evaluation criteria and rank these firms in order of preference. If less than three consultants are evaluated, provide justification for agency file.
277
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
References:

California Government Code §4526
California Government Code §4527
California Government Code §4529.12
E. Selection Basis
Selection of a firm shall be based on qualifications and the order of ranked preference.

References:
278
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
California Government Code §4526
California Government Code §4527
F. Publication
Solicitations for A&E contracts shall be in a manner that is open and competitive.

Reference: California Government Code §4527
G. Solicitation
The solicitations shall include published evaluation criteria to rank in order of preference. Clearly define expectations in the solicitation in order to evaluate firms.

Reference: California Government Code §4527
H. Cost Analysis
An independent cost comparison to the consultant’s cost proposal shall be done in order to ensure the contract is negotiated at a fair and reasonable price.

Reference: California Government Code §4528
I. Negotiations
Negotiations must be documented to verify a fair and reasonable contract has been executed using public funds.

Reference: California Government Code §4528
J. Audit and Review Process
A&E contracts procured by public agencies shall be subject to standard accounting practices and may require financial and performance audits. All agencies shall follow the Audit and Review Process as stated in Section 10.1.3: A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process.

Financial Document Review Request form.

References:

California Government Code §4529.14
2 CFR 200
K. A&E Consultant Contract Form
The A&E Consultant Contract form must be completed and submitted in the database at https://dla.dot.ca.gov/fmi/webd/AE%20Consultant%20Contract%20Form (please use Firefox or Chrome if not supported by your browser) prior to contract award, or after contract award but no 279
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
later than the first invoice for all new state-only funded A&E consultant contracts.

If there are any changes requiring an amendment to the contract after submittal of the A&E Consultant Contract form, the LPA must submit an updated form to the database prior to the first invoice after the contract has been amended. Submission of the A&E Consultant Contract form is not required for non-A&E consultant contracts.

Reference: LAPM Ch.10.2
280
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}

CA GOVERNMENT CODE REFERENCES
California GOV §1090
(a) Members of the Legislature, state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees shall not be financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity, or by anybody or board of which they are members. Nor shall state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees be purchasers at any sale or vendors at any purchase made by them in their official capacity. (b) An individual shall not aid or abet a Member of the Legislature or a state, county, district, judicial district, or city officer or employee in violating subdivision (a).
(c) As used in this article, “district” means any agency of the state formed pursuant to general law or special act, for the local performance of governmental or proprietary functions within limited boundaries.

California GOV §4006
Plans, specifications, work authorizations describing work to be performed, and all other information referred to in this chapter are open to inspection and examination as a public record.

California GOV §4525
For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meaning:
(a) “Firm” means any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity permitted by law to practice the profession of architecture, landscape architecture, engineering, environmental services, land surveying, or construction project management.
(b) “State agency head” means the secretary, administrator, or head of a department, agency, or bureau of the State of California authorized to contract for architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, and construction project management services. (c) “Local agency head” means the secretary, administrator, or head of a department, agency, or bureau of any city, county, city and county, whether general law or chartered, or any district which is authorized to contract for architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, and construction project management services.
(d) “Architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, and land surveying services” includes those professional services of an architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, or land surveying nature as well as incidental services that members of these professions and those in their employ may logically or justifiably perform.
(e) “Construction project management” means those services provided by a licensed architect, registered engineer, or licensed general contractor which meet the requirements of Section 4529.5 for management and supervision of work performed on state construction projects. (f) “Environmental services” means those services performed in connection with project development and permit processing in order to comply with federal and state environmental laws. “Environmental services” also includes the processing and awarding of claims pursuant to Chapter 6.75 (commencing with Section 25299.10) of Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code.

California GOV §4526
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, selection by a state or local agency head for professional services of private architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, or construction project management firms shall be on the basis of demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required. In order to implement this method of selection, state agency heads contracting for private architectural, landscape architectural, professional engineering, environmental, land surveying, and construction project management services shall adopt by regulation, and local agency heads contracting for private architectural, landscape architectural, professional engineering, environmental, land surveying, and construction project management services may adopt by ordinance, procedures that assure that these services are engaged on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications for the types of services to be performed and at fair and reasonable prices to the public agencies. Furthermore, these procedures shall assure maximum participation of small business firms, as defined by the Director of General Services pursuant to Section 14837. 281
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
In addition, these procedures shall specifically prohibit practices which might result in unlawful activity including, but not limited to, rebates, kickbacks, or other unlawful consideration, and shall specifically prohibit government agency employees from participating in the selection process when those employees have a relationship with a person or business entity seeking a contract under this section which would subject those employees to the prohibition of Section 87100.

California GOV §4527
In the procurement of architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, and construction project management services, the state agency head shall encourage firms engaged in the lawful practice of their profession to submit annually a statement of qualifications and performance data. (a) When the selection is by a state agency head, statewide announcement of all projects requiring architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, or construction project management services shall be made by the agency head through publications of the respective professional societies. The agency head, for each proposed project, shall evaluate current statements of qualifications and performance data on file with the agency, together with those that may be submitted by other firms regarding the proposed project, and shall conduct discussions with no less than three firms regarding anticipated concepts and the relative utility of alternative methods of approach for furnishing the required services and then shall select therefrom, in order of preference, based upon criteria established and published by him or her, no less than three of the firms deemed to be the most highly qualified to provide the services required. (b) When the selection is by a local agency head, the agency head may undertake the procedures described in subdivision (a). In addition, these procedures shall specifically prohibit practices which might result in unlawful activity including, but not limited to, rebates, kickbacks, or other unlawful consideration, and shall specifically prohibit government agency employees from participating in the selection process when these employees have a relationship with a person or business entity seeking a contract under this section.

California GOV §4528
(a) When the selection is by a state agency head the following procedures shall apply:
(1) The state agency head shall negotiate a contract with the best qualified firm for architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, and construction project management services at compensation which the state agency head determines is fair and reasonable to the State of California or the political subdivision involved.
(2) Should the state agency head be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the firm considered to be the most qualified, at a price the agency head determines to be fair and reasonable to the State of California or the political subdivision involved, negotiations with that firm shall be formally terminated. The state agency head shall then undertake negotiations with the second most qualified firm. Failing accord with the second most qualified firm, the state agency head shall terminate negotiations. The state agency head shall then undertake negotiations with the third most qualified firm. (3) Should the state agency head be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with any of the selected firms, the state agency head shall select additional firms in order of their competence and qualification and continue negotiations in accordance with this chapter until an agreement is reached. (b) When the selection is by a local agency head, the local agency head may undertake the procedures described in subdivision (a).

California GOV §4529
This chapter shall not apply where the state or local agency head determines that the services needed are more of a technical nature and involve little professional judgment and that requiring bids would be in the public interest.

California GOV §4529.12
All architectural and engineering services shall be procured pursuant to a fair, competitive selection process which prohibits governmental agency employees from participating in the selection process when they have a financial or business relationship with any private entity seeking the contract, and the procedure shall require 282
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
compliance with all laws regarding political contributions, conflicts of interest or unlawful activities.

California GOV §4529.14
Architectural and engineering services contracts procured by public agencies shall be subject to standard accounting practices and may require financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget.

California GOV §4529.20
This act seeks to comprehensively regulate the matters which are contained within its provisions. These are matters of statewide concern and when enacted are intended to apply to charter cities as well as all other governmental entities.

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM 2 CFR PART 200 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE 12/4/2014
Attachment A: FHWA 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Guidance – Questions and Answers Question 21: “Will the FHWA/USDOT provide a waiver of the requirements in 2 CFR 200.317 for subrecipients to comply with State procurement requirements or other policies and procedures approved by the State (200.317)?” Answer: Yes. The USDOT requested and received an OMB waiver of the requirements in 2 CFR 200.317 concerning procurement by subrecipients. This waiver provides an exception to the requirement for all subrecipients of a state to follow the procurement requirements in Sections 200.318 through 200.326. The waiver will allow States and subrecipients to continue to use state-approved procurement procedures as they did under part 18 prior to the adoption of the Uniform Guidance.
283
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}

10.3 NON-A&E CONTRACTS
Scope
This section covers the procurement requirements for the services that are not included in Section 10.1 Federally-Funded A&E Contracts and Section 10.2 State-Only Funded A&E Contracts. This guidance is for contracts utilizing federal-aid funds and state funds. Federal regulations refer to state and local regulations for non-A&E type contracts. Although LPAs are required to follow 2 CFR 200: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards for all contracts, the Procurement Standards section 200.318- 200.326 is exempt. The guidance in this section follows the established regulations in the California Public Contract Code. Depending upon the scope of work, the required contract provisions may need to include the California State Prevailing Wages.

LPA must designate one person within the LPA as a contract manager. (PCC 10348.5)
LPAs using local funds to procure non-A&E Consultants on a federal-aid funded or state-only funded project and will not seek federal or state reimbursement for consultant cost may choose not to follow the selection and contracting procedures detailed in Section 10.3 of this chapter.

Determining Non-A&E
After identifying that there is a need for consulting services, the LPA must determine that the services needed are more of a technical nature and involve minimal professional judgement and that requiring a cost proposal would be in the public’s best interest. These type of consultant services that are not directly related to a highway construction project or that are not included in the definition of engineering and design-related services are considered non-A&E. The services must not be included in Section 10.2.2 Definition of A&E.

The determining factor is whether the services being procured are related to a specific construction project and whether the services require work to be performed, provided by, or under the direction of a registered engineer or architect.

Example of Determining Non-A&E
Material testing has been requested to ensure quality assurance on a construction project. The service includes only performing the material test and providing material test data. Although the service is related to a construction project, the overall service did not provide an evaluation or a discipline report. In this example, the LPA can determine that the service provided is more of a technical nature and is therefore a non-A&E service.

The following is a list of the more common non-A&E services:
• Right-of-Way Appraisal
• Right-of Way acquisition activities
• Conducting public outreach during environmental clearance or construction • Active Transportation Program educational and outreach activities • Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)
284
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• Non-Infrastructure
• Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) associated with Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)-funded projects
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Projects
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) means electronic, communications, or information processing used singly or in combination to improve the efficiency or safety of a surface transportation system. ITS projects are those that in whole or in part, fund the acquisition of technologies or systems of technologies that provide significant contributions to the provision of one or more ITS user services as defined in the National ITS Architecture.

The federal-aid procurement regulations identify three possible contract procurement procedures for ITS projects including engineering and design related services (A&E), construction, and non-engineering/non-architectural (non-A&E).

If ITS projects include physical installation of field devices and/or communications infrastructure, such as new traffic signals, new controller cabinets, changeable message signs, radio and computers, vehicle detectors, and conduits for cabling in the roadway, then that work and required equipment usually meets the definition of construction. The construction contract must be procured based on competitive bidding. If the ITS project involves software development, system integration, hiring engineers, and specialists for ITS design and installation support, inspection, design documentation, training and deployment, it may be considered an engineering and design services contract and the contract must be procured as an A&E consultant contract. If the scope of work is unclear as to whether it is an A&E type of work, contact [email protected] for assistance.

However, if an ITS project does not meet either the definition of construction or engineering and design services, then the contract may be considered to be a non-A&E consultant contract.

Examples of non-A&E consultant contracts are:
• The procurement of hardware and software associated with incident management system;
• Software systems for arterial and freeway management systems; • Operating the 511 traveler information service;
• Nonprofessional services for system support such as independent validation and verification, testing and specification development;
For more information regarding Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program procurement requirements, refer to LAPG Chapter 13: Intelligent Transportation Systems.

Non-Infrastructure Projects
Non-infrastructure (NI) projects are those transportation-related projects that do not involve either engineering design, Right-of-Way acquisition (for additional guidance refer to LAPM Chapter 13), or the eventual physical construction of transportation facilities.

Procurement of non-A&E consultant contracts associated with non-infrastructure projects must follow Non-A&E procurement procedures described in this chapter. For more information on NI 285
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
projects, refer to LAPM Chapter 3: Project Authorization. 286
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Governing Regulations and Codes for Non-A&E
When procuring non-A&E services with federal-aid funds, LPAs must comply with 2 CFR 200:

Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, excluding sections 200.318-200.326 Procurement Standards (reference FHWA December 4, 2014 Memorandum Action: 2 CFR 200 Implementation Guidance, Attachment A).

LPAs must follow the same policies and procedures that the State uses for procurement with its non-Federal funds. When procuring non-A&E services with federal-aid and state-only funds, the governing procurement code is Public Contract Code 10335-10381.

Procurement of Non-A&E Consultant Contracts
All non-A&E procurements contracts must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with federal and state standards. LPA must meet the code of conduct governing the performance of its employees engaged in the award and administration of federal-aid and state-funded contracts, including the preventions of conflict of interest in PCC 10410.

The following are the fundamental rules when procuring a non-A&E consultant contract.

1. The request for proposal (RFP) must not limit the competition directly or indirectly to any one consultant. The RFP must be publicized, and all evaluation factors and their relative importance identified (PCC 10339).

2. Splitting a single transaction into a series of transactions for the purpose of evading the procurement requirements is not allowed (PCC 10329).

3. LPA must secure at least three competitive proposals for each contract. (PCC 10340) When receiving less than three proposals, refer to the Cost-Effective/Public Interest Finding in this section as an alternative to re-advertisement.

4. No proposals must be considered which have not been received at the place, and prior to the closing time as stated in the RFP (PCC 10344(a)).

5. LPA must have a written procedure for evaluating proposals (PCC 10344).

6. RFP Basic Requirements
There are two general types of consulting service contract solicitations:

A. Request for Proposal using Cost only
B. Request for Proposal using Cost and Qualifications
The LPA must include the following in the request for proposal:

A. A clear, precise description of the work to be performed or services to be provided.

B. Description of the format that proposals must follow and the elements they must contain.

C. The standards the agency will use in evaluating proposals. This includes qualifications and certifications if applicable.

D. The date the proposals are due.

E. The procurement schedule that the LPA will follow in reviewing and evaluating the 287
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
proposals.
(PCC 10344)
Additional Requirements and Evaluation Criteria
Additional Requirements for Request for Proposal using Cost only A. LPA must require consultants to submit their proposals and cost in a separate, sealed envelope.

B. LPA must determine those that meet the format requirements and the standards specified in the request for proposal.

C. The sealed envelopes containing the price and cost information for those proposals that meet the format requirements and standards must then be publicly opened and read.

D. Contract must be awarded to the lowest responsible consultant meeting the standards. (PCC 10344(b))
Additional Requirements for Request for Proposal using Cost and Qualifications A. LPA must include in the proposal the description of the evaluation and scoring method.

Substantial weight in relationship to all other criteria utilized must be given to the cost amount proposed by the consultant.

B. LPA must determine those that meet the format requirements specified in the RFP.

C. LPA evaluation committee must evaluate and score the proposals using the methods specified in the RFP. All evaluation and scoring sheets must be available for public inspection after the committee scoring process. Evaluation committee should comply to the prevention of conflict of interest in PCC 10410.

D. The non-A&E contract must be awarded to the consultant whose proposal is given the highest score by the evaluation committee.
(PCC 10344(c))
When using RFP (Cost and Qualifications), the criteria used to evaluate the consultant’s proposals must have a logical foundation within the scope of work or within other technical requirements contained in the RFP. Each criterion must have a weight or level of importance, and it is recommended that total possible score for the evaluation criteria be one hundred (100) points. The proposed cost should be at least thirty percent (30%) of total points in evaluation criteria.

An example RFP for non-A&E is provided on the Local Assistance website at https://dot.ca.gov/- /media/dot-media/programs/local-assistance/documents/ae/files/rfp-example-non-ae.docx and may be modified.

Submission of the A&E Consultant Contract form is not required for non-A&E consultant contracts.

Consultant’s Proposal
The consultant’s proposal should include the following information:
• Consultant Project Manager – qualifications, roles, and responsibilities. 288
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
• Methodology - description of work and overall approach, specific techniques that will be used and specific administrative and operations expertise to be used. • Workplan and Work Schedule - the technical proposal should include activities and tasks, and their delivery schedule.
• Personnel - List of personnel who will be working on the project, and their resumes. • Facilities and resources (If applicable) - Explanation of where the services will be provided and what type of equipment is needed to perform services. • Sub-contracts - Identify all sub-contracts that are to be used, description of each, and the work by each sub-consultant/sub-contractor. No work must be subcontracted unless listed in the technical proposal. Sub-consultant resumes should be provided. • References - The technical proposal should provide at least three (3) clients for whom the proposer has performed work of similar nature to the request.

Cost Proposal Worksheet
The RFP should provide a standard format for cost proposal that all proposers must include in their proposal. The cost proposal format can be broken down by specific tasks, showing hourly labor rates, level of effort and material, and/or by milestones and deliverables.

LPA is not required to award a contract if it is determined that the contract price is not reasonable (PCC 10340(c)).

DBE Consideration
DBE consideration is required on all federal-aid funded contracts including non-A&E.

Administrative Requirements
Advertisement for RFPs may be through the LPA website, local publications, and national publications. Minimum solicitation time is 14 calendar days. The solicitation should inform potential qualified consultants that questions must be submitted in writing to the Agency Contract Manager/Administrator by a specified date and time. All pertinent technical information and answers to consultant’s questions must be provided to all potential consultants. Written responses to all questions will be collectively compiled and provided as an addendum.

A proposal may be considered nonresponsive and rejected without evaluation if all required information is not provided. Proposals without information regarding, or not meeting, the required DBE utilization goal or without a Good Faith Effort documentation (see Exhibit 15-H:

Proposer/Contractor Good Faith Efforts), late submittals, submittals to the wrong location, or submittals with inadequate copies are considered nonresponsive and must be rejected.

Submittal of additional information after the due date must not be allowed. Documentation of when each proposal was received must be maintained in the project files. Copies of date stamped envelope covers or box tops are recommended.

No consultant who has been awarded a consulting service contract may be awarded a subsequent contract for the services or goods which are required as an end product of the consulting service contract, unless the subcontract is no more than 10 percent of the total monetary value of the consulting services contract. Excludes A&E contracts. 289
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
(PCC 10365.5)
Contracts may be modified or amended only if the contracts so provide. Amendments must be requested and executed prior to the termination date of the most recently approved original or amended contract. All records of contract activities must be kept for three years after federal final voucher E-76 or state final voucher for State-Only funds. Costs are reimbursable after state allocation by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and/or the issuance of the federal E-76. The per diem rate must not exceed the state rate. Contract Managers are responsible for monitoring expenditures on all contracts and verifying categories of work that require prevailing wage. A person in Responsible Charge of contract management is required for all federallyfunded projects.

Oral Presentations Optional
When oral presentations are required by the LPA, the evaluation criteria must include factors/sub-factors and weights used to score the proposers performance at the oral presentation. The evaluation committee will only be able to score each proposer based upon these criteria. The Contract Manager/Administrator should develop a set of questions related to the scope of work or the project to be asked during the evaluation committee question and answer (Q & A) section of the oral presentations. All proposers are asked the same questions for consistency.

The committee must also evaluate reference checks and other information gathered independently. Reference checks must be completed, and other information gathered before the interviews are conducted. If necessary, the results of the reference checks or other information may be discussed with the highest ranked qualified consultants at the interviews.

Cost-Effective / Public Interest Finding
A minimum of three proposals must be evaluated to establish effective competition. Any agency that has received less than three proposals on a contract must document the names and addresses of the firms or individuals it solicited for proposals. Prepare an explanation as to why less than three proposals were received. When only two proposals are received, a justification must be documented to proceed with the procurement. When only one proposal is received, a Non-Competitive process must be justified and a Public Interest Finding (PIF) (Exhibit 12-F:

Cost-Effective/Public Interest Finding/A&E Noncompetitive) must be documented. In either case, the re-advertisement of the RFP should be considered as an option. Retain document as supporting documentation in the contract file.
(PCC 10340(c))
Protest / Appeals / Reinstatement Procedures
Both state and federal regulations require well-defined protest/reinstatement procedures. It is essential that the procedures include a reasonable opportunity for the prospective consultant to present his/her case. The appeals procedures strengthen the process by which the contracting agency reaches its ultimate goal and helps defends its action against a claim of lack of due process. A termination clause and a provision for settlement of contract disputes are required.

Protest procedures and dispute resolution processes should be in accordance with PCC 10345. 290
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}

10.4 A&E OVERSIGHT PROGRAM AND PROCESS REVIEW
General
The A&E Oversight Branch is responsible for the oversight of consultant contracts procured by LPAs complying with federal regulations 23 CFR 172 and 23 U.S.C.112, and state regulations California Government Code 4525.

For locally-administered federal-aid highway projects, A&E consultant contract oversight reviews will be performed by Caltrans’ Local Assistance A&E Oversight Engineers (A&EOEs).

DLAE staff should participate in the reviews.

Type of Reviews
The purpose of A&E consultant contract oversight reviews is to verify LPA compliance with federal and state consultant contract administration requirements. A risk-based approach has been identified by the A&E branch to aid LPAs with compliance that includes requiring agencies to complete and submit the A&E Consultant Contract form prior to contract award, or after contract award but no later than the first invoice. The objective is to create a database documenting all consultant contracts and to perform process reviews on a sample of contracts for the annual performance measures report.

Although the risk-based approach is the submittal of the A&E Consultant Contract form via the database, a process review may be conducted on projects for reporting purposes and to determine accuracy of the A&E Consultant Contract form information.

A&E Consultant Contract Form Review
The purpose of the A&E Consultant Contract form is to provide oversight and guidance to an LPA regarding consultant contract administration on a federal or state-funded project prior to the award of the contract. The database includes items considered critical for compliance with federal and state regulations.

Subsequent process reviews may be performed on selected state and/or federal projects requiring a greater degree of oversight if deemed necessary for agencies with a noncompliance history.

The following factors may be used when selecting projects for subsequent review:
• LPAs with identified deficiencies during an Incurred Cost Audit • Projects administered by agencies with previous sanctions/findings • Lack of experienced/trained LPA personnel
• Request by LPA or DLAE for additional assistance
During subsequent process reviews, the A&EOE will meet with the LPA's consultant contract administration team and discuss project record documentation requirements using the A&E Consultant Contract form. The timing of these types of reviews is targeted for preadvertisement, pre-negotiations, and pre-award of the consultant contract. This will allow for any changes to take place prior to execution or termination of negotiations for re-advertising. The A&EOE will also explain new policies or procedures, discuss available training, and highlight common problem areas and the means to avoid them.
291
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Review Findings and Deficiencies
Caltrans will not be involved in most project-level reviews and approval activities. Instead, the Process Review as outlined in this section is Caltrans’ primary method of ensuring that federal and state requirements are met. During a Process Review of an LPA’s project files, errors and/or deficiencies that may violate federal or state law or regulation could be found. If that happens, federal and/or state funds may be withdrawn from a project depending on the severity and circumstance of the deficiency, as well as the possibility of jeopardizing future federal and/or state funding opportunities for the agency’s other projects.

It is important to note that the formal process review is not the only method of discovering project deficiencies. Errors or deficiencies are discovered occasionally as part of the normal routine of processing project submittals by DLAEs or DLA Area Engineers.

Review findings from any subsequent reviews will be forwarded to the LPA and the DLAE within five business days. Deficiencies identified during a review may require development of a corrective action plan by the LPA in consultation with the district within 30 calendar days of receipt of the deficiency notification, unless the agency disagrees with the deficiencies identified and appeals the decision as discussed below.

A list of common A&E consultant procurement-related deficiencies is found at the A&E website.

These examples, not all-inclusive, should assist LPAs with knowing common deficiencies found in the past and the possible ramifications for those errors and deficiencies. The key to avoiding possible sanctions is to follow the procedures outlined in this chapter and other appropriate policies and guidelines, and if you have any questions, to consult your DLAE.

Corrective action plans, if required, will identify actions the LPA will take to address each deficiency noted. Corrective actions may include the following: Re-advertising, modifications of LPA policies and procedures, and participation in training to address systemic related deficiencies. Project-specific issues may require additional measures to remedy deficiencies to ensure compliance with federal and state requirements and ensure reimbursement eligibility.

Corrective action plans must also include timelines for each action to be implemented. Failure to provide and implement corrective actions may result in sanctions or federal/state ineligibility notices against the project or LPA and could prevent federal or state participation in all or a portion of the project.

In the event the LPA disagrees with the deficiencies identified, the LPA will have 30 calendar days from receipt of the deficiency notification to submit their written request for appeal in accordance with the DLA’s Local Agency Dispute Resolution Process. If the appeal is denied, the LPA will have 30 calendar days from receipt of the decision to submit their corrective action plan.

The Dispute Resolution Process provides a means for the LPA to appeal a sanction that they feel has been imposed upon them unfairly or they feel the penalty is too harsh for the error or deficiency. This appeal process is not limited to just the appeal of sanctions; it can be used by LPAs when they disagree with the decision, they receive from a district office. 292
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10
Consultant Selection

January 2023
{00023810.DOCX;1}

10.5 SANCTIONS
Depending on the severity and circumstances of the deficiencies which may require sanctioning by Caltrans, the DLA or DLAE may impose one of the following sanctions:
• Freeze on all future programming of federal or state funds until corrective action is implemented
• Freeze progress payments for a federal-aid project until the project’s deficiency is corrected
• Percentage of federal or state funds for a project withdrawn • All federal or state funds withdrawn from a project
The DLAE will be responsible for notifying the LPA of sanctions imposed. Whether or not sanctions are imposed against an LPA, the LPA will be expected to develop a corrective action plan and implement it to correct the deficiencies. LPAs will be given adequate time to develop and implement their action plan. Failure to correct the deficiencies in a timely manner will be grounds for imposing additional sanctions
293
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2)
2 CFR 200.318(j)(1)(ii) (enhanced display) page 100 of
40 {00023810.DOCX;1}

EXHIBIT C
Trade secrets, commercial information, materials necessary to be held confidential by a researcher until they are published, or similar information which is protected under law; and Personnel and medical information and similar information the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, such as information that could be used to identify a particular person in a research study. § 200.316 Property trust relationship.

Real property, equipment, and intangible property, that are acquired or improved with a Federal award must be held in trust by the non-Federal entity as trustee for the beneficiaries of the project or program under which the property was acquired or improved. The Federal awarding agency may require the non-Federal entity to record liens or other appropriate notices of record to indicate that personal or real property has been acquired or improved with a Federal award and that use and disposition conditions apply to the property.

PROCUREMENT STANDARDS
§ 200.317 Procurements by states.

When procuring property and services under a Federal award, a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds. The State will comply with §§ 200.321, 200.322, and 200.323 and ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes any clauses required by § 200.327. All other nonFederal entities, including subrecipients of a State, must follow the procurement standards in §§ 200.318 through 200.327.
§ 200.318 General procurement standards.

The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327.

Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.

The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. However, non-Federal entities may set standards for situations in which the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The standards of conduct must provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by 294
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2)
2 CFR 200.318(j)(1)(ii) (enhanced display) page 101 of
40 {00023810.DOCX;1}
officers, employees, or agents of the non-Federal entity.

If the non-Federal entity has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian tribe, the non-Federal entity must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization.

The non-Federal entity's procedures must avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items.

Consideration should be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase. Where appropriate, an analysis will be made of lease versus purchase alternatives, and any other appropriate analysis to determine the most economical approach.

To foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements.

The non-Federal entity is encouraged to use Federal excess and surplus property in lieu of purchasing new equipment and property whenever such use is feasible and reduces project costs.

The non-Federal entity is encouraged to use value engineering clauses in contracts for construction projects of sufficient size to offer reasonable opportunities for cost reductions. Value engineering is a systematic and creative analysis of each contract item or task to ensure that its essential function is provided at the overall lower cost.

The non-Federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. See also § 200.214.

The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.

The non-Federal entity may use a time-and-materials type contract only after a determination that no other contract is suitable and if the contract includes a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk. Time-and-materials type contract means a contract whose cost to a non-Federal entity is the sum of:

The actual cost of materials; and
Direct labor hours charged at fixed hourly rates that reflect wages, general and administrative expenses, and profit.
295
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.318(j)(2)
2 CFR 200.319(d) (enhanced display) page 102 of 40
{00023810.DOCX;1}
Since this formula generates an open-ended contract price, a time-and-materials contract provides no positive profit incentive to the contractor for cost control or labor efficiency. Therefore, each contract must set a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk. Further, the non-Federal entity awarding such a contract must assert a high degree of oversight in order to obtain reasonable assurance that the contractor is using efficient methods and effective cost controls.

The non-Federal entity alone must be responsible, in accordance with good administrative practice and sound business judgment, for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of procurements. These issues include, but are not limited to, source evaluation, protests, disputes, and claims. These standards do not relieve the non-Federal entity of any contractual responsibilities under its contracts. The Federal awarding agency will not substitute its judgment for that of the non-Federal entity unless the matter is primarily a Federal concern. Violations of law will be referred to the local, state, or Federal authority having proper jurisdiction.
[85 FR 49543, Aug. 13, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 10440, Feb. 22, 2021] § 200.319 Competition.

All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320.

In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, or invitations for bids or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements. Some of the situations considered to be restrictive of competition include but are not limited to:

Placing unreasonable requirements on firms in order for them to qualify to do business; Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding; Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies; Noncompetitive contracts to consultants that are on retainer contracts; Organizational conflicts of interest;
Specifying only a “brand name” product instead of allowing “an equal” product to be offered and describing the performance or other relevant requirements of the procurement; and Any arbitrary action in the procurement process.

The non-Federal entity must conduct procurements in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals, except in those cases where applicable Federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference. Nothing in this section preempts state licensing laws. When contracting for architectural and engineering (A/E) services, geographic location may be a selection criterion provided its application leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project, to compete for the contract.

The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations:
296
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) 2 CFR 200.320(b) (enhanced display) page 103 of
40 {00023810.DOCX;1}
Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, a “brand name or equivalent” description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be met by offers must be clearly stated; and
Identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals.

The non-Federal entity must ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products which are used in acquiring goods and services are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum open and free competition. Also, the non-Federal entity must not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period.

Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with § 200.320(c). § 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed.

The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award.

Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The nonFederal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include:

Micro-purchases -
Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (See the definition of micro-purchase in § 200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers.

Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly.

Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity.

Micro-purchase thresholds. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining and documenting an appropriate micro-purchase threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures. The micro-purchase threshold 297
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) 2 CFR 200.320(b) (enhanced display) page 104 of
40 {00023810.DOCX;1}
used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or triballaws or regulations. Non-Federal entities may establish a threshold higher than the Federal threshold established in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) in accordance with paragraphs (a)(1)(iv) and (v) of this section.

Non-Federal entity increases to the micro-purchase threshold up to $50,000. Non-Federal entities may establish a threshold higher than the micro-purchase threshold identified in the FAR in accordance with the requirements of this section. The non-Federal entity may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the Federal awarding agency and auditors in accordance with § 200.334. The selfcertificaincreasest include a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation of any of the following:

A qualification as a low-risk auditee, in accordance with the criteria in § 200.520 for the most recent audit;
An annual internal institutional risk assessment to identify, mitigate, and manage financial risks; or,
For public institutions, a higher threshold consistent with State law.

Non-Federal entity increase to the micro-purchase threshold over $50,000. Micro-purchase thresholds higher than $50,000 must be approved by the cognizant agency for indirect costs.

The non-federal entity must submit a request with the requirements included in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this section. The increased threshold is valid until there is a change in status in which the justification was approved.

Small purchases -
Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.

Simplified acquisition thresholds. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations.

Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate:
(C)
298
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1)
2 CFR 200.320(b)(2)(iv) (enhanced display) page 105 of
40 {00023810.DOCX;1}
Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions.

In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present:

A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and
The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price.

If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply:

Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason.

Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements:

Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical;
The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections;
Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of (C)
(C)
(D)
299
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.322
2 CFR 200.324(d) (enhanced display) page 26 of 40
{00023810.DOCX;1}
fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort.

Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply:

The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); The item is available only from a single source;
The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation;
The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. § 200.321 Contracting with small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms.

The non-Federal entity must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible.

Affirmative steps must include:

Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business enterprises on solicitation lists;
Assuring that small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources;
Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises; Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises; Using the services and assistance, as appropriate, of such organizations as the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; and
Requiring the prime contractor, if subcontracts are to be let, to take the affirmative steps listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section.
§ 200.322 Domestic preferences for procurements.

As appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, the non-Federal entity should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, 300
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.322
2 CFR 200.324(d) (enhanced display) page 26 of 40
{00023810.DOCX;1}
cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award.

For purposes of this section:
“Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber. § 200.323 Procurement of recovered materials.

A non-Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines. § 200.324 Contract cost and price.

The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.

The non-Federal entity must negotiate profit as a separate element of the price for each contract in which there is no price competition and in all cases where cost analysis is performed. To establish a fair and reasonable profit, consideration must be given to the complexity of the work to be performed, the risk borne by the contractor, the contractor's investment, the amount of subcontracting, the quality of its record of past performance, and industry profit rates in the surrounding geographical area for similar work.

Costs or prices based on estimated costs for contracts under the Federal award are allowable only to the extent that costs incurred or cost estimates included in negotiated prices would be allowable for the nonFederal entity under subpart E of this part. The non-Federal entity may reference its own cost principles that comply with the Federal cost principles.

The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used.
301
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.326(a)
2 CFR 200.329(b) (enhanced display) page 28 of 40
{00023810.DOCX;1}
§ 200.325 Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity review.

The non-Federal entity must make available, upon request of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity, technical specifications on proposed procurements where the Federal awarding agency or passthrough entity believes such review is needed to ensure that the item or service specified is the one being proposed for acquisition. This review generally will take place prior to the time the specification is incorporated into a solicitation document. However, if the non-Federal entity desires to have the review accomplished after a solicitation has been developed, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may still review the specifications, with such review usually limited to the technical aspects of the proposed purchase.

The non-Federal entity must make available upon request, for the Federal awarding agency or passthrough entity pre-procurement review, procurement documents, such as requests for proposals or invitations for bids, or independent cost estimates, when:

The non-Federal entity's procurement procedures or operation fails to comply with the procurement standards in this part;
The procurement is expected to exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and is to be awarded without competition or only one bid or offer is received in response to a solicitation; The procurement, which is expected to exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, specifies a “brand name” product;
The proposed contract is more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and is to be awarded to other than the apparent low bidder under a sealed bid procurement; or A proposed contract modification changes the scope of a contract or increases the contract amount by more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.

The non-Federal entity is exempt from the pre-procurement review in paragraph (b) of this section if the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that its procurement systems comply with the standards of this part.

The non-Federal entity may request that its procurement system be reviewed by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to determine whether its system meets these standards in order for its system to be certified. Generally, these reviews must occur where there is continuous high-dollar funding, and third-party contracts are awarded on a regular basis; The non-Federal entity may self-certify its procurement system. Such self-certification must not limit the Federal awarding agency's right to survey the system. Under a self-certification procedure, the Federal awarding agency may rely on written assurances from the non-Federal entity that it is complying with these standards. The non-Federal entity must cite specific policies, procedures, regulations, or standards as being in compliance with these requirements and have its system available for review.
§ 200.326 Bonding requirements.

For construction or facility improvement contracts or subcontracts exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may accept the bonding policy and requirements of the nonFederal entity provided that the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity has made a determination that the Federal interest is adequately protected. If such a determination has not been made, the minimum requirements 302
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.326(a)
2 CFR 200.329(b) (enhanced display) page 28 of 40
{00023810.DOCX;1}
must be as follows:

A bid guarantee from each bidder equivalent to five percent of the bid price. The “bid guarantee” must consist of a firm commitment such as a bid bond, certified check, or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as assurance that the bidder will, upon acceptance of the bid, execute such contractual documents as may be required within the time specified.

A performance bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. A “performance bond” is one executed in connection with a contract to secure fulfillment of all the contractor's requirements under such contract.

A payment bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. A “payment bond” is one executed in connection with a contract to assure payment as required by law of all persons supplying labor and material in the execution of the work provided for in the contract. § 200.327 Contract provisions.

The non-Federal entity's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in appendix II to this part.

PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL MONITORING AND REPORTING
§ 200.328 Financial reporting.

Unless otherwise approved by OMB, the Federal awarding agency must solicit only the OMB-approved governmentwide data elements for collection of financial information (at time of publication the Federal Financial Report or such future, OMB-approved, governmentwide data elements available from the OMB-designated standards lead. This information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes, and preferably in coordination with performance reporting.

The Federal awarding agency must use OMB-approved common information collections, as applicable, when providing financial and performance reporting information. § 200.329 Monitoring and reporting program performance.

Monitoring by the non-Federal entity. The non-Federal entity is responsible for oversight of the operations of the Federal award supported activities. The non-Federal entity must monitor its activities under Federal awards to assure compliance with applicable Federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved. Monitoring by the non-Federal entity must cover each program, function or activity. See also § 200.332.

Reporting program performance. The Federal awarding agency must use OMB-approved common information collections, as applicable, when providing financial and performance reporting information.

As appropriate and in accordance with above mentioned information collections, the Federal awarding agency must require the recipient to relate financial data and accomplishments to performance goals and objectives of the Federal award. Also, in accordance with above mentioned common information collections, and when required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, recipients must provide 303
2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (up to date as of 1/26/2023)
Post Federal Award Requirements 2 CFR 200.326(a)
2 CFR 200.329(b) (enhanced display) page 28 of 40
{00023810.DOCX;1}
cost information to demonstrate cost effective practices (e.g., through unit cost data). In some instances (e.g., discretionary research awards), this will be limited to the requirement to submit technical performance reports (to be evaluated in accordance with Federal awarding agency policy). Reporting requirements must be clearly articulated such that, where appropriate, performance during the execution of the Federal award has a standard against which non-Federal entity performance can be measured. 304
2-7
Approval - Consideration of Resolution
2025-54R Regarding Notice of
Completion for the FY23/24 Selma
Street Rehabilitation Project
305
ITEM NO: 2-7

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEETING
DATE:

July 1, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2025-54R Regarding Notice of Completion for the FY23/24 Selma Street Rehabilitation Project.

SUBMITTED: David Horn, City Engineer
APPROVED: Jerome Keene, Deputy City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the Notice of Completion for the FY23/24 Selma Street Rehabilitation Project and authorize the City Manager to execute the required documents.

BACKGROUND:

The FY23/24 Selma Street Rehabilitation Project (“Project”) was a project funded from the Gas Tax money provided to the City of Selma. The funding for the project was as follows:

The project included the rehabilitation of asphalt street sections for portions of Aspen Street, Dennis Drive, Mulberry Street, F Street, E Street, and Alton Street. The project also included the removal and repair of accessible concrete curb ramps as well as a number of concrete valley gutters to improve storm drainage.

The Project was awarded to Don Berry Construction, Inc. Resolution No. 2024-138R by the Council on December 2, 2024. Construction began on January 20, 2025, and was completed on June 6, 2025.

DISCUSSION:

The Public Works and Engineering Department is requesting that the City Council approve the Notice of Completion for the Project. All work has been completed, has met all design standards, inspected and approved by the Public Works Director and City Engineer. 306
FISCAL IMPACT:

The funding for this project was budgeted in Fund 211 – Gas Tax.

The estimated cost for the construction phase of the project was $1,091,536. The actual cost to date for the project was $1,010,124. The difference between budget and actuals are as detailed below.

Budget Actual Delta
Construction $894,236 $894,236 $0
Construction Contingency $90,000 $21,497 ($68,503)
Constr. Mngmt./Inspection/Testing/Admin $107,300 $94,391 ($12,909) Totals $1,091,536 $1,010,124 ($81,412)
Attachments:
☒ Resolution 1) 2025-54R
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☒ Other
List: 2) NOC Document for Recording
307
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 – 54R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SELMA,

CALIFORNIA APPROVING FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND

NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
FY23/24 SELMA STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, Don Berry Construction, Inc., a California Corporation, has completed the work for the FY23/24 Selma Street Rehabilitation Project; and, WHEREAS, the Contract Public Works Inspector has inspected the improvements required by the City and all improvements required have been completed; and, WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends acceptance of FY23/24 Selma Street Rehabilitation Project and requests City Council to authorize the City Engineer to record the Notice of Completion for the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SELMA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds that the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council accepts the FY23/24 Selma Street Rehabilitation Project and authorize the City Engineer to record the Notice of Completion.

Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this Resolution are severable and if any provision, clause, sentence, word or part thereof is held illegal, invalid, unconstitutional, or inapplicable to any person or circumstances, such illegality, invalidity, unconstitutionality, or inapplicability shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, clauses, sentences, sections, words or parts thereof of the Resolution or their applicability to other persons or circumstances.

Section 4. Effective Date. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and that the same shall be in full force and effect.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

____________________________
ATTEST: Scott Robertson
Mayor
______________________________
Sara Carlson
City Clerk
308
Recording Requested By
City of Selma
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
When Recorded Return To:

City of Selma - City Clerk
1710 Tucker Street
Selma, CA 93662

THIS SPACE IS FOR RECORDING INFORMATION ONLY

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(UNDER SECTION 1187 C.C.P.)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the undersigned, City of Selma, a Municipal Corporation, is the owner of the real estate situated in the City of Selma, County of Fresno, State of California, and described as follows, to-wit:

FY23/24 Selma Street Rehabilitation Project for curb ramps, asphalt paving, and valley gutters; That the address of said owner is City Hall, 1710 Tucker Street, Selma, California; That the nature of the title of the owner to said real estate is that of fee simple and/or easement; That the name of the Contractor is Don Berry Construction, Inc., 13701 Golden State Blvd., Kingsburg, CA 93631;
That on the 6th day of June, 2025, the Contract for the work on the above-described property was actually completed.

I, Jerome Keene, being duly sworn says:

That I am the agent of the Owner of the property described in the foregoing Notice; that I have read the foregoing Notice and know the contents thereof, and that the same is true of my own knowledge.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under laws of the State of California that the statements on this notice are true and correct.

CITY OF SELMA, a Municipal Corporation
By:_____________________________
Jerome Keene, Deputy City Manager
Owner
State of California
County of Fresno
On July 1, 2025, before me, Mary J. Venegas, Notary Public, personally appeared Jerome Keene, Deputy City Manager, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under laws of the State of California the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
______________________________________
Mary J. Venegas, Notary Public, City of Selma
(Acknowledgment taken by City Clerk pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1181) A notary public or other officer
completing this certificate verifies only
the identity of the individual who signed
the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document."
309
310
2-8
Approval - Consideration and
Necessary Action on Resolution
2025-51R Approving and Authorizing
Execution of Fire Chief Employment
Agreement
311
ITEM NO: 2-8

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEETING
DATE:

July 1, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration and Necessary Action on Resolution 2025-51R Approving and Authorizing Execution of Fire Chief Employment Agreement.

SUBMITTED: Neal E. Costanzo, City Attorney
APPROVED: John Kunkel, Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2025-51R Approve Resolution and authorize execution of Fire Chief Employment Agreement.

DISCUSSION:

At a closed session meeting the Council approved and authorized the City Attorney to prepare a replacement agreement for the employment of Selma’s Fire Chief. The previous employment agreement, because of presumed clerical errors, was ineffective and contained unnecessary or inappropriate provisions.

The City Attorney has prepared a Fire Chief Employment Agreement, a copy of which is attached to the Resolution for review and final approval by the Council. The Council approved an Employment Agreement for the Fire Chief according to the precise terms contained in the proposed Fire Chief Employment Agreement, unanimously, in closed session.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

Attachments:
☒ Resolution 2025-51R
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☒ Other
List: Fire Chief Employment
Agreement
312
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-51R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING

EXECUTION OF FIRE CHIEF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, in closed session on June 17, 2025, the City Council approved in principal the terms of a new employment agreement with the Fire Chief; and WHEREAS, a new Fire Chief Employment Agreement, a copy of which is attached and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A has been negotiated between the City and the Fire Chief, Jordan Webster; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to formally approve the Fire Chief Employment Agreement negotiated between it and the Fire Chief.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The City Council has reviewed and approves the Fire Chief Employment Agreement attached and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A and the Mayor is authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City of Selma.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Scott Robertson
Mayor
ATTEST:

Sara M. Carlson
City Clerk
313
314
4-1
Consideration and Necessary Action of
Resolution 2025-52R Approving Rates for
Landscaping Lighting and Maintenance
District No.1 (LLMD), approving
Engineer’s Report Identifying the
Assessments and the Property against
which it is assessed within the LLMD,
and Directing Collection thereof by
Placement of the Assessment on the
2025-2026 Fresno County Tax Roll
315
ITEM NO: 4-1

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEETING
AGENDA:

July 1, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration and Necessary Action of Resolution 2025-52R Approving Rates for Landscaping Lighting and Maintenance District No.1 (LLMD), approving Engineer’s Report Identifying the Assessments and the Property against which it is assessed within the LLMD, and Directing Collection thereof by Placement of the Assessment on the 2025-26 Fresno County Tax Roll.

SUBMITTED: David Horn, City Engineer
APPROVED: Jerome Keene, Deputy City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution Approving Rates for all zones within LLMD No.1 and Engineer’s Report and Placement of Assessments on Fresno County Tax Roll for Collection.

BACKGROUND:

At its meeting on June 3, 2025, the City Council approved a Resolution adopting and approving an Engineer’s Report setting the amount of assessments within LLMD No.1 and setting a hearing for today’s date on those assessments and approval of the Engineer’s Report identifying the follow rates per zone:

Zone # Zone Name
Proposed 2025/26
Assessment per lot
Zone 1 Nelson East $82.85
Zone 2 Nelson West $81.44
Zone 3 Dinuba Thompson $100.56
Zone 4 Dancer Meadows $108.46
Zone 5 Suncrest $137.29
Zone 6 Blossom Ranch $81.42
Zone 7 Sundance Estates $68.37
Zone 8 Rosewood Estates $128.82
Zone 9 Vineyard Estates $69.81
Zone 11 Royal Country Estates $167.62
The total amount assessed within the LLMD is $191,668.13.

DISCUSSION:

Having given the appropriate and legally required Notices of its intention to do so, the City Council is being requested to approve the proposed rates and to approve the levy and collection of the annual assessments for the LLMD No.1 as reflected by the Engineer’s Report and direct that the Engineer’s Report be provided to Fresno County Auditor-Controller/Tax Collector for placement on the 2025-26 Tax Roll.
316
FISCAL IMPACT:

No Fiscal Impact
Attachments:
☒ Resolution 2025-52R
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☒ Other
List: Final Engineer’s Report
317
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 – 52R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SELMA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE LEVY AND

COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICES RENDERED IN THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. 1 IN THE

CITY OF SELMA
WHEREAS, in 1984, the City established a Landscaping Lighting and Maintenance District (“LLMD”) to provide certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities. The costs of the improvements are covered through a levy on each parcel within the LLMD; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared a CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT on Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No.1 in the City of Selma; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 22626 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Council held a public hearing on the 1st day of July, 2025, at which time interested persons were invited to appear and be heard on the question of the levy and collection of the proposed assessments.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SELMA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds that the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 3. The City Council adopts the assessments for LLMD No. 1, set forth in the Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Section 4. That the assessments set forth in the Report shall be filed with the Fresno County Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector, and said assessments shall be collected on the property tax roll all in accordance with State law.

Section 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file this Resolution and the Engineer’s Report with the Fresno County Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector.

Section 6. Severability. The provisions of this Resolution are severable and if any provision, clause, sentence, word or part thereof is held illegal, invalid, unconstitutional, or inapplicable to any person or circumstances, such illegality, invalidity, unconstitutionality, or inapplicability shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, clauses, sentences, sections, words or parts thereof of the Resolution or their applicability to other persons or circumstances.

Section 7. Effective Date. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and that the same shall be in full force and effect.
(Signatures on next page)
318
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

____________________________
ATTEST: Scott Robertson
Mayor
______________________________
Sara Carlson
City Clerk
319

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Intent Meeting: April 15, 2025
Public Hearing: July 1, 2025
Scott Robertson
Mayor
Sarah Guerra
Mayor Pro Tem
Santiago Oceguera
Council Member
Jim Avalos
Council Member
John Trujillo
Council Member
John Kunkel
Interim City Manager
Jerome Keene
Deputy City Manager
Sara Carlson
City Clerk
David C. Horn, PE, LS, CASp
City Engineer
320
ENGINEER’S REPORT AFFIDAVIT

CITY OF SELMA

FRESNO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No.1
FISCALYEAR 2025-26
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer’s Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated: , 2025
By
D a v i d C . H o r n , P.E., L.S., CASp
RCE No. 63,679
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filedwith me on the ____ day of ________, 2025.

Sara Carlson, City Clerk City of Selma
Fresno County,California
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Selma, Fresno County, California, on the _____ day of _________, 2025.

Sara Carlson, City Clerk City of Selma
FresnoCounty, California
By
321
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 1 DISTRICT CHANGES................................................................................................ 1 REPORT CONTENT AND ANNUAL PROCEEDINGS.................................................... 1 PART A – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS................................................................... 3 ZONES OF BENEFIT................................................................................................. 3 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT............................................................................ 4 PART B – ESTIMATE OF COSTS ................................................................................ 8 ASSESSMENT RATE HISTORICAL INFORMATION.................................................... 11 PART C –ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM........................................................... 12 PART D – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS .................................. 13 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR ASSESSMENTS................................................ 13 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY.............................................................................. 14 PART E – PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL ........................................ 16 PART F – APPENDIX .............................................................................................. 17 EXHIBIT A – ENGINEERS ESTIMATE

EXHIBIT B - OVERALL ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
EXHIBIT C – LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DIAGRAM
EXHIBIT D – ADDRESS DIAGRAM
EXHIBIT E – PROPERTY OWNER LIST &ASSESSMENT ROLL
322
Page | 1
ENGINEER’SREPORTPREPAREDPURSUANT TOTHEPROVISIONSOF
LANDSCAPINGANDLIGHTINGACTOF 1972
SECTION22500 THROUGH22679

OF THECALIFORNIA STREETS ANDHIGHWAYSCODE

SELMA LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTINGMAINTENANCE
DISTRICTNo.1
FISCALYEAR2025-26

INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500), and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation, being Resolution No. 2025-26R, adopted by the City Council of the City of Selma on April 15th, 2024.

I, David C. Horn, P.E. the duly appointed Engineer of Work, City Engineer for the Selma LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING Maintenance District No. 1 (“District”) submit the following Report.

District Changes
For fiscal year 2025/2026, no notable or substantial changes to the District and/or the improvements to be maintained by the District have occurred since the adoption of the 2024/2025 fiscal year Annual Engineer’s Report.

Report Content
This Engineer’s Annual Report (the “Report”) has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 1, Article 4, and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act. It is presented to the City Council for consideration and approval of proposed improvements and services within the District, as well as the levy and collection of annual assessments for the Fiscal Year 2025/2026. The Report details the structure of the District's zones, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied for the special benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of these improvements for the Fiscal Year 2025/2026.

The annual assessments levied on properties within the District provide funding for the continued operation and maintenance of landscaping improvements and other services provided by the City within the District. These services are for the benefit of the properties within each specified Zone, which receive special benefits, including street lighting in some Zones. Each fiscal year, the City determines the assessments for the Zones within the District based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate, and service the authorized improvements, considering available revenues such as assessment revenues, fund balances, and any additional City contributions from available sources.

The costs of the maintenance of the improvements within the District may include estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs, incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District, deficits or surpluses from prior years, revenues from other sources, and the collection of funds for operational reserves and/or periodic repairs, replacement and 323
Page | 2
rehabilitation projects as authorized by the 1972 Act. The net annual cost to provide the improvements for each benefit Zone is allocated to the benefiting properties within those Zones using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Part D – Method of Apportionment). This method calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel compared to other properties that benefit from the District improvements and services. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses from which it will receive special benefit.

For the purposes of this Report, the term “parcel” refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Fresno County Assessor’s Office.

This Report include the following 5 sections:

PARTA:PLANSANDSPECIFICATIONS
This part describes the improvements in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the list thereof, attached hereto, and on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Selma, and incorporated herein by reference.

PARTB: ESTIMATEOFCOST
This part contains an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements for FY 2025-26, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith. The estimate is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Selma.

PARTC:ASSESSMENTDISTRICTDIAGRAM
This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the exterior boundaries of the District, the boundaries of all zones within the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District. This Diagram was prepared by the City Engineer and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Selma.

The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Fresno County Assessor for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor’s maps and records are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Report.

PARTD:METHODOFAPPORTIONMENTOFASSESSMENTS
This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received.

PARTE:PROPERTYOWNERLIST&ASSESSMENTROLL
This part contains an assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the District. The Assessment Roll is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Selma. The Assessment roll is keyed to the records of the Fresno County Assessor, which are incorporated herein by reference. 324
Page | 3

PART A - PLANSANDSPECIFICATIONS
The landscape improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained and serviced by the District generally include, but are not limited to, trees, bushes, plants, turf, irrigation systems including electrical meters, hardscapes, entry features and subdivision monuments, block walls and fences, and appurtenant improvements as required to provide an aesthetically pleasing environment throughout the District. These landscape improvements were constructed as a condition of development and are generally located within the City’s right-of-way, within City easements, and within City open space areas.

The street lighting improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained and serviced by the District generally include, but are not limited to, poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, pull boxes, equipment, including guys, anchors, posts, pedestals and metering devices, and appurtenant improvements as required to provide safe lighting within the boundaries of the District.

The detention basin improvements that can be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District generally include graded slopes, fencing, outlet and overflow structures, and the detention basin itself.

The plans and specifications for the improvements for each development within each Zone of the District are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Selma.

ZONES OF BENEFIT
In accordance with the 1972 Act, this District utilizes Zones to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements that provide special benefits to parcels within the District.

Each Zone is associated with specific improvements and/or types of improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone.

For Fiscal Year 2025-2026 the District is comprised of the following Zones and developments:

Zone 1 – Nelson East
Zone 1 is comprised of 378 residential units within Tract 3824, Tract 3957, Tract 4713, Tract 3130, Tract 3637, Tract 4123, Tract 4489, Tract 4568 Northill, Tract 4889 Villa Corvino III, and Tract 5296.

Zone 2 – Nelson West
Zone 2 is comprised of 427 residential units within Tract 3352, Tract 3932, Tract 3949, Parcel Map 86- 69, Tract 4066, Tract 4107, Tract 5040, Tract 5053 Jordan Villas, Tract 4923 Chesebro Estates, Tract 4946 La Dante Rose Phase 2, Tract 5216 Rosewood Estates III Phase 1, and Tract 5333 Rosewood Estates III Phase 2.
325
Page | 4
Zone 3 – Dinuba Thompson
Zone 3 is comprised of 201 residential units within Tract 3745 Thompson Terrace II, Tract 3870, Tract 3969, Tract 4174 Northview, Tract 4349 Vinland Estates Phases 2 and 3, Tract 4618, and Tract 4735 Vinland Estates.

Zone 4 – Dancer Meadows
Zone 4 is comprised of 213 residential units within Tract 4319, 4373, Tract 4500, and Tract 4730 Thompson Estates.

Zone 5 – Suncrest
Zone 5 is comprised of 88 residential units within Tract 4536 Suncrest, and Tract 5183.

Zone 6 – Blossom Ranch
Zone 6 is comprised of 63 residential units within Tract 4806 Blossom Ranch.

Zone 7 – Sundance Estates
Zone 7 is comprised of 172 residential units within Tract 4864 Sundance Estates, Tract 4965 Sundance Estates II, and Tract 5156 Duncan Estates.

Zone 8 – Rosewood
Zone 8 is comprised of 254 residential units within Tract 4597, Tract 5055, Tract 5303 Valley View Phase 1, and Tract 5303 Valley View Phase 2.

Zone 9 – Vineyard Estates
Zone 9 is comprised of 153 residential units within Tract 5217 Canales.

Zone 11 – Royal Country
Zone 11 is comprised of 59 residential units within Tract 5105 Royal Country Estates Phase 1, and Tract 5105 Phase 2.

The District is comprised of 2,008 residential parcels.

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
Under the 1972 Act, the District offers improvements including landscaping, parks, and street lighting to enhance real property areas within its zones. Maintenance and servicing tasks include the supply of personnel, materials, and utilities necessary for upkeep and operation. The District comprises ten zones for the fiscal year 2025-2026. Each zone's boundaries are determined by the type of improvement and its benefit to the properties within that zone. Detailed zone and improvement descriptions are provided in Part C of the District Report, including visual diagrams. 326
Page | 5
Zone 1 – Nelson East
The properties within Zone 1, proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 76,403 square feet of landscaping and/or related improvement areas that includes the following:
• 38,050 Square feet of turf area
• 36,261 Square feet of plant and non-turf landscaping area • 125 Trees that require maintenance trimming
• 76,403 Square feet of total landscaped area requiring irrigation • 2,092 Square feet of dirt area that requires replanting • 1 - 60W Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
• 70 - 30W Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
Zone 2 – Nelson West
The properties within Zone 2, proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 75,006 square feet of landscaping and/or related improvement areas that includes the following:
• 29,790 Square feet of turf area
• 43,513 Square feet of plant and non-turf area
• 165 Trees that requires maintenance trimming
• 75,006 Square feet of total landscaped area requiring irrigation • 1,703 Square feet of dirt area that requires replanting • 79 - 30W Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
Zone 3 – Dinuba Thompson
The properties within Zone 3, proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 17,840 square feet of landscaping and/or related improvement areas that includes the following:
• 17,840 Square feet of plant and non-turf area
• 94 Trees that requires maintenance trimming
• 17,840 Square feet of total landscaped area requiring irrigation • 42 30W Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
Zone 4 – Dancer Meadows
The properties within Zone 4, proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 28,579 square feet of landscaping and/or related improvement areas that includes the following:
• 16,699 Square feet of maintenance required turf area
• 7,919 Square feet of maintenance required plant area
• 17 Trees that requires maintenance trimming
• 28,579 Square feet of total landscaped area requiring irrigation • 3,961 Square feet of dirt area that requires replanting • 45 30W Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
327
Page | 6
Zone 5 – Suncrest
The properties within Zone 5, proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 16,457 square feet of landscaping and/or related improvement areas that includes the following:
• 5,885 Square feet of maintenance required turf area
• 8,082 Square feet of maintenance required plan area
• 36 Trees that requires maintenance trimming
• 16,457 Square feet of total irrigation required landscaping • 2,490 Square feet of dirt area that requires replanting • 24 30W Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
Zone 6 – Blossom Ranch
The properties within Zone 6, proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 9,655 square feet of landscaping and/or related improvement areas that includes the following:
• 9,655 Square feet of maintenance required plant area
• 15 Trees that requires maintenance trimming
• 9,655 Square feet of total irrigation required landscaping • 15 30W Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
Zone 7 – Sundance Estates
The properties within Zone 7, proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 9,566 square feet of landscaping and/or related improvement areas that includes the following:
• 7,113 Square feet of maintenance required turf area
• 2,453 Square feet of maintenance required plant area
• 27 Trees that requires maintenance trimming
• 9,566 Square feet of total irrigation required landscaping • 33 30W Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
Zone 8 – Rosewood
The properties within Zone 8, proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 75,074 square feet of landscaping and/or related improvement areas that includes the following:
• 51,248 Square feet of maintenance required turf area
• 17,012 Square feet of maintenance
• 40 Trees that requires maintenance trimming
• 75,074 Square feet of total irrigation required landscaping • 6,814 Square feet of dirt area that requires replanting • 5 HPSV 70W Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
• 32 LED 30W LS1-E Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
• 21 LED 30W Streetlight(s) to be supplied power
328
Page | 7
Zone 9 – Vineyard Estates
The properties within Zone 9, proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 3,092 square feet of landscaping and/or related improvement areas that includes the following:
• 3,092 Square feet of dirt area that requires replanting • 1 60W Streetlight to be supplied power
• 28 30W Streetlights to be supplied power
• 19 30W LS-1A Streetlights to be supplied power
• 5 HPSV 70W Streetlights to be supplied power
• 18 LED 35W Streetlights to be supplied power
Zone 11 – Royal Country
The properties within Zone 11, proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 21,834 square feet of landscaping and/or related improvement areas that includes the following:
• 8,068 Square feet of maintenance required turf area
• 13,766 Square feet of maintenance
• 39 Trees that requires maintenance trimming
• 21,834 Square feet of total irrigation required landscaping • 11 30W Streetlights to be supplied power.
329
Page | 8

PART B - ESTIMATEOFCOST
The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of landscape and lighting improvements can be recovered by the District.

The costs to construct, operate, maintain, and service the landscape and lighting improvements include, but are not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contractual services and other items necessary for the landscape and lighting improvements to be properly operated, maintained and serviced to City standards.

Maintenance means the furnishing of services, materials and supplies for the ordinary and usual operations, maintenance and servicing of the landscaping, lighting and appurtenant improvements, including the repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping, street lighting or appurtenant improvements; including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; and the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste.

Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping improvements and the furnishing of electric current or energy for the operation of streetl i g h t s , irrigation controllers or other appurtenant improvements.

Below is a summary of the improvements that will be operated, maintained, and serviced by the assessment district. The estimated costs for maintenance labor is based on approximately 640 manhours required per acre of flat area. With a cost of $22 per hour on average for maintenance staff, the total maintenance cost would be $14,080 per acre per year (approx. $0.32 per square foot per year). This cost would be further broken down based on estimated level of effort for the different types of maintenance required, as described below.

TURF MAINTENANCE:

Costs associated with maintaining healthy lawns
on a city-wide scale, including mowing, fertilizing,
and upkeep of turf in public rights of way. This
section also covers the elimination of weeds and
other invasive or unplanned vegetation in these
areas. The estimated annual cost to maintain the
turf areas was calculated to be $0.13 per square
foot.
330
Page | 9
PLANT MAINTENANCE:

Plant maintenance costs cover the pruning and
trimming of plants located in public rights of way.

Adequate maintenance practices help minimize
future replanting costs. The estimated annual
cost to maintain the plant and non-turf areas was
calculated to be $0.13 per square foot.

TREE TRIMMING:

Trees are essential for a vibrant, healthy city. The
costs associated with tree trimming and pruning
support healthier growth and longevity. These expenses also ensure clear visibility of roadway signs and safe, unobstructed paths of travel. The estimated annual cost to maintain and trim the street trees was calculated to be $26.50 per tree.

IRRIGATION REPAIR:

Given the high demand and usage of the irrigation system, repairs are inevitable. We use past repair costs to project an average for the upcoming year. The estimated annual cost to maintain the irrigation system was calculated to be $0.10 per square foot.

RE-PLANT AREA:

Despite diligent maintenance efforts, some areas
may lose their lush, green appearance beyond
revival. In such cases, costs are incurred to
replant and re-establish a new, healthy
landscaped area. The estimated annual cost to
re-plant the areas without landscaping was
calculated to be $0.15 per square foot.

CALWATER IRRIGATION:

Irrigation water used for landscaped areas, turf
and non-turf landscaping is supplied through
metered services from CalWater. The cost for irrigation water is invoiced from CalWater to the City each year. Each Zone uses a different amount of water due to the irrigation design and installation.

The estimated cost for irrigation water is based on the actual cost from CalWater for the proceeding year.

PG&E COST:

The cost for electricity to service the irrigation timers is determined by the rates established by PG&E. The annual cost for each Zone varies due to the time required to irrigate the specific landscaping for the Zone. Some irrigation timers are battery powered and do not require PG&E power. The estimated cost for the PG&E utility cost for irrigation is based on the actual costs of the proceeding year with an annual rate increase of approximately 10%. 331
Page | 10
STREETLIGHT COST:

This cost covers the PG&E utility cost billed to the City to power and maintain the streetlights provided in each Zone. PG&E invoices include the cost for each type of streetlight on a monthly basis. 30W streetlights are charged at a rate of $13.028 per month ($156.34 per month). 60W streetlights are charged at a rate of $16.644 per month ($199.73 per month). HPSV 70W streetlights are charged at a rate of $10.481 per month ($125.77 per month). 30W LED streetlights are charged at a rate of $4.215 per month ($50.58 per month). 30W streetlights on schedule LS1A are charged at a rate of $10.467 per month ($125.60 per month).

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and e xpenditures of the District. Funds raised by the assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. Any balance remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year unless the funds are being accumulated for future capital improvements and/or operating reserves.

The construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing costs for Fiscal Year 2025-26 are summarized in Engineer’s Estimates for each zone in the Appendix.

The following table summarizes the estimated costs for each Zone for PG&E, Water, Maintenance, and Incidental Costs.

Zone Name
Tax
ID#
No.
of
Lots PG&E Water Maintenance
Incidental
Costs Total Cost
1 Nelson East 6645 378 11,353.25 12,100.00 20,942.97 5,214.34 49,610.56 2 Nelson West 6646 427 12,635.54 19,500.00 21,673.00 6,233.73 60,042.27 3 Dinuba-Thompson 6647 201 6,776.11 7,750.00 6,594.20 2,700.40 23,820.71 4 Dancer Meadows 6648 213 7,185.12 12,150.00 7,102.89 2,961.20 29,399.21 5 Suncrest 6639 88 3,822.06 6,420.00 4,788.91 1,352.11 16,383.08 6 Blossom Ranch 6641 63 2,415.04 1,850.00 2,622.54 855.33 7,742.91 7 Sundance 6649 172 5,229.09 3,680.00 2,915.68 2,068.02 13,892.79 8 Rosewood Estates 6642 254 6,773.79 20,810.00 18,503.32 3,903.11 49,990.22 9 Vineyard Estates 6637 153 8,512.91 900.00 773.00 1,637.84 11,823.75 11 Royal Country Estates 6654 59 3,130.38 4,775.00 6,055.32 1,041.86 15,002.56 2025-2026 Totals 2008 67,833.29 89,935.00 91,971.83 27,967.94 277,708.06 332
Page | 11

ASSESSMENT RATE HISTORICAL INFORMATION
Beginning in 2009, assessment rates were assigned to the Zones. Prior to this year, assessments were apportioned to each Tract. The table below shows the assessment rate for each Zone for each fiscal year from 2009-10 through 2024-25.

Zone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
Tax ID#: 6645 6646 6647 6648 6639 6641 6649 6642 6637 6654 Year
2009-10 82.20 89.34 71.70 85.00 94.20 90.42 68.60 87.04 89.72 2010-11 80.58 92.74 74.64 89.48 88.86 89.82 70.50 124.84 91.94 2011-12 80.58 92.74 74.64 89.48 88.86 89.82 70.50 124.84 91.94 2012-13 80.58 92.74 74.64 89.48 88.86 89.82 70.50 124.84 91.94 2013-14 99.70 124.32 87.00 102.90 115.62 103.10 86.80 119.76 116.86 2014-15 99.70 124.32 87.00 102.90 115.62 103.10 86.80 119.76 116.86 2015-16 99.70 124.32 87.00 102.90 115.62 103.10 86.80 119.76 116.86 2016-17 99.70 124.32 87.00 102.90 115.62 103.10 86.80 119.76 116.86 2017-18 110.72 134.06 104.42 114.82 138.66 102.30 99.30 139.96 85.02 124.52 2018-19 114.14 141.82 109.98 120.86 148.92 106.82 105.34 166.88 87.18 156.60 2019-20 114.14 141.82 109.98 120.86 148.92 106.82 105.34 166.88 65.74 156.60 2020-21 105.28 123.34 93.88 120.86 129.74 106.84 58.94 122.54 15.94 190.12 2021-22 105.28 123.34 93.88 120.86 129.74 106.84 58.94 122.54 8.68 190.12 2022-23 105.28 123.34 93.88 120.86 129.74 106.84 58.94 122.54 8.68 190.12 2023-24 105.28 123.34 93.88 120.86 129.74 106.84 58.94 122.54 8.68 190.12 2024-25 123.47 148.14 102.85 133.42 179.74 122.03 75.47 191.12 77.16 237.44 Bold values represent the maximum assessment rate for each Zone in previous years. 333
Page | 12

PARTC - ASSESSMENTDISTRICTDIAGRAM
The boundaries of the Selma LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING Maintenance District No. 1 are shown on the reduced map, which can be found in APPENDIX A as EXHIBIT(S) B, C & D. For the particulars of the lines and dimensions for each Assessor Parcel Number, please refer to the Assessor Parcel Maps located at the Fresno County Assessor office for the year in which this Report was prepared. 334
Page | 13

PARTD - METHODOFAPPORTIONMENTOFASSESSMENT
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The formula used for calculating assessments in each zone, therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to parcels within each zone.

In addition, pursuant to Article XIIID, Section 4 of the State Constitution, a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel and provides that only special benefits are assessable. Therefore, in compliance with the new assessment requirements, only assessments that are identified as “Special Benefit Assessments” are assessed.

Estimates for materials and miscellaneous expenses included are based on the best available data known at the time the budgets for each District were prepared and the assessment was determined.

Benefit Analysis
The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that the assessed parcels within each zone receive equal benefit from the improvements maintained and financed by the District’s assessments. The assessments are for the maintenance of local landscape improvements installed as part of the original development of the parcels within each zone and approved by property owners at the annexation of the zone into the District. The desirability of properties within each zone is enhanced by the presence of well-maintained landscaping and sufficient lighting in close proximity to those properties.

The improvements provided by the District generally include landscaped parkways, entryways, recreation/retention areas, street lighting for pedestrians and vehicles, and any other appurtenant facilities. The annual assessments outlined in this Report are proposed to cover the estimated cost to provide all necessary services, operation, administration, and maintenance required during the year to keep these improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition. 335
Page | 14
The special benefits associated with the local landscaping and lighting improvements are specifically:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties within the Districts providing a positive representation of the area.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of property resulting from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties.
• Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District though well-maintained surroundings and amenities, including abatement of graffiti.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels within the Districts by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuating noise. • Intersection lighting to maximize illumination and reduce potential vehicular accidents.
• Illumination of walkways and pathways to increase pedestrian foot traffic and facilitate safety.
• Public streetlights serving a property provide a variety of benefits to the property. o Access benefit – public streetlights improve ingress and egress from properties from dusk to dawn.
o Security benefit – public streetlights help reduce vandalism against properties and criminal acts on properties between dusk to dawn.
o Traffic benefit - Public Street lights improve safety and facilitate the flow traffic to and from properties between dusk to dawn.

All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the Districts creating a more distinctive and a greater defined quality of life.

Assessment Methodology
Each single-family residential parcel within each of the various areas benefits equally from the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of the landscaping and street lighting improvements within the service area. Therefore, the total assessment revenue needed to construct, operate, maintain and service the landscaping and street lighting improvements will be spread equally to each single-family residential parcel within each service area. 336
Page | 15
The following table shows the estimated cost for each Zone, number of residential lots in each zone, and the calculated assessment rate per lot for each Zone. If a surplus of funds is projected to exist on July 1, 2025, the proposed assessment total is reduced to use the surplus. The proposed assessment rate per lot is based on the remaining estimated cost for each area divided by the number of parcels within the area. This method of establishing the assessment rates expenses surplus amount for each area while budgeting for the estimated annual cost for maintenance.

Zone Tax ID#
No. of
Lots
Total
Cost/Area
Projected
Surplus on
July 1, 2025
Remaining
Cost/Area
Proposed 2025-2026
Assessment
# Name $ / Lot $ / Area
1 Nelson East 6645 378 49,610.56 18,293.00 31,317.56 82.85 31,317.30 2 Nelson West 6646 427 60,042.27 25,264.55 34,777.73 81.44 34,774.88 3 Dinuba-Thompson 6647 201 23,820.71 3,606.26 20,214.45 100.56 20,212.56 4 Dancer Meadows 6648 213 29,399.21 6,296.34 23,102.88 108.46 23,101.98 5 Suncrest 6639 88 16,383.08 4,300.90 12,082.18 137.29 12,081.52 6 Blossom Ranch 6641 63 7,742.91 2,612.94 5,129.97 81.42 5,129.46 7 Sundance 6649 172 13,892.79 2,131.71 11,761.08 68.37 11,759.64 8 Rosewood Estates 6642 254 49,990.22 17,268.88 32,721.33 128.82 32,720.28 9 Vineyard Estates 6637 153 11,823.75 1,141.34 10,682.41 69.81 10,680.93 11 Royal Country Estates 6654 59 15,002.56 5,112.94 9,889.62 167.62 9,889.58 2025-2026 Totals 2008 277,708.06 86,028.85 191,679.21 191,668.13 337
Page | 16

PART E - PROPERTYOWNERLIST&ASSESSMENTROLL
Exhibit “E” in the Appendix includes a listing of the Assessor parcels located within the boundaries of the Selma Landscape and lighting Maintenance District No. 1 that will be assessed in FY 2025-26 and the amount that each parcel is to be assessed.
338
Page | 17

APPENDIX A
Exhibit ‘A’ –Construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing costs Exhibit ‘B’ – Overall Assessment Diagram
Exhibit ‘C’ – Landscape and Lighting Diagram
Exhibit ‘D’ – Address Diagram
Exhibit ‘E’ – Property Owner List & Assessment Roll
339
Page | 18

EXHIBIT A
Construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing costs 340
City of Selma LLMD Engineer's Report 2985 North Burl Ave., Suite 101 Zone #1 Fresno, CA 93727
City of Selma (559) 244-3121
Date: 6/3/2025
Prepared by: DH

ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 Turf Maintenance (turf area) 38,140 SF $ 0.13 $ 4,958.20 2 Plant Maintenance (plant area) 36,240 SF $ 0.13 $ 4,711.24 3 Tree Trimming 125 EA $ 26.50 $ 3,312.50
4 Irrigation Repair (total area) 76,472 SF $ 0.10 $ 7,647.23 5 Re-Plant Area (dirt area) 2,092 SF $ 0.15 $ 313.80
$ 20,942.97
1 Cal Water Irrigation 1 YR $ 12,100.00 $ 12,100.00
2 PG&E 1 YR $ 210.00 $ 210.00
3 Streetlights (60W) 1 EA $ 199.73 $ 199.73
4 Streetlights (30W) 70 EA $ 156.34 $ 10,943.52
1 Recording Fee 378 LOT $ 0.16 $ 60.48
2 Public Notice 378 LOT $ 0.29 $ 109.62
3 Professional Services - Eng Report 378 LOT $ 10.00 $ 3,780.00 4 Supplies 1.8 AC $ 539.75 $ 947.56
5 Equipment 1.8 AC $ 9.50 $ 16.68
6 Backflow Testing/Repair 4 EA $ 75.00 $ 300.00
$ 49,610.56

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Utility Costs
Incidental Costs

TOTAL ESTIMATE
Maintenance Costs
F:\2025\25-187\Excel\25-187 Est Costs 25-26.xlsx
341
City of Selma LLMD Engineer's Report 2985 North Burl Ave., Suite 101 Zone #2 Fresno, CA 93727
City of Selma (559) 244-3121
Date: 6/3/2025
Prepared by: DH

ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 Turf Maintenance (turf area) 29,804 SF $ 0.13 $ 3,874.58 2 Plant Maintenance (plant area) 43,564 SF $ 0.13 $ 5,663.32 3 Tree Trimming 165 EA $ 26.50 $ 4,372.50
4 Irrigation Repair (total area) 75,071 SF $ 0.10 $ 7,507.15 5 Re-Plant Area (dirt area) 1,703 SF $ 0.15 $ 255.45
$ 21,673.00
1 Cal Water Irrigation 1 YR $ 19,500.00 $ 19,500.00
2 PG&E 1 YR $ 285.00 $ 285.00
3 Streetlights 79 EA $ 156.34 $ 12,350.54
1 Recording Fee 427 LOT $ 0.16 $ 68.32
2 Public Notice 427 LOT $ 0.29 $ 123.83
3 Professional Services - Eng Report 427 LOT $ 10.00 $ 4,270.00 4 Supplies 1.7 AC $ 539.75 $ 930.21
5 Equipment 1.7 AC $ 9.50 $ 16.37
6 Backflow Testing/Repair 11 EA $ 75.00 $ 825.00
$ 60,042.27

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Maintenance Costs
Utility Costs
Incidental Costs

TOTAL ESTIMATE
F:\2025\25-187\Excel\25-187 Est Costs 25-26.xlsx
342
City of Selma LLMD Engineer's Report 2985 North Burl Ave., Suite 101 Zone #3 Fresno, CA 93727
City of Selma (559) 244-3121
Date: 6/3/2025
Prepared by: DH

ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 Turf Maintenance (turf area) 0 SF $ 0.13 $ -
2 Plant Maintenance (plant area) 17,840 SF $ 0.13 $ 2,319.20 3 Tree Trimming 94 EA $ 26.50 $ 2,491.00
4 Irrigation Repair (total area) 17,840 SF $ 0.10 $ 1,784.00 5 Re-Plant Area (dirt area) 0 SF $ 0.15 $ -
$ 6,594.20
1 Cal Water Irrigation 1 YR $ 7,750.00 $ 7,750.00
2 PG&E 1 YR $ 210.00 $ 210.00
3 Streetlights 42 EA $ 156.34 $ 6,566.11
1 Recording Fee 201 LOT $ 0.16 $ 32.16
2 Public Notice 201 LS $ 0.29 $ 58.29
3 Professional Services - Eng Report 201 LOT $ 10.00 $ 2,010.00 4 Supplies 0.4 AC $ 539.75 $ 221.05
5 Equipment 0.4 AC $ 9.50 $ 3.89
6 Backflow Testing/Repair 5 EA $ 75.00 $ 375.00
$ 23,820.71

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Maintenance Costs
Utility Costs
Incidental Costs

TOTAL ESTIMATE
F:\2025\25-187\Excel\25-187 Est Costs 25-26.xlsx
343
City of Selma LLMD Engineer's Report 2985 North Burl Ave., Suite 101 Zone #4 Fresno, CA 93727
City of Selma (559) 244-3121
Date: 6/3/2025
Prepared by: DH

ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 Turf Maintenance (turf area) 16,699 SF $ 0.13 $ 2,170.87 2 Plant Maintenance (plant area) 7,919 SF $ 0.13 $ 1,029.47 3 Tree Trimming 17 EA $ 26.50 $ 450.50
4 Irrigation Repair (total area) 28,579 SF $ 0.10 $ 2,857.90 5 Re-Plant Area (dirt area) 3,961 SF $ 0.15 $ 594.15
$ 7,102.89
1 Cal Water Irrigation 1 YR $ 12,150.00 $ 12,150.00
2 PG&E 1 YR $ 150.00 $ 150.00
3 Streetlights 45 EA $ 156.34 $ 7,035.12
1 Recording Fee 213 LOT $ 0.16 $ 34.08
2 Public Notice 213 LS $ 0.29 $ 61.77
3 Professional Services - Eng Report 213 LOT $ 10.00 $ 2,130.00 4 Supplies 0.7 AC $ 539.75 $ 354.12
5 Equipment 0.7 AC $ 9.50 $ 6.23
6 Backflow Testing/Repair 5 EA $ 75.00 $ 375.00
$ 29,399.21

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Maintenance Costs
Utility Costs
Incidental Costs

TOTAL ESTIMATE
F:\2025\25-187\Excel\25-187 Est Costs 25-26.xlsx
344
City of Selma LLMD Engineer's Report 2985 North Burl Ave., Suite 101 Zone #5 Fresno, CA 93727
City of Selma (559) 244-3121
Date: 6/3/2025
Prepared by: DH

ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 Turf Maintenance (turf area) 5,885 SF $ 0.13 $ 765.05 2 Plant Maintenance (plant area) 8,082 SF $ 0.13 $ 1,050.66 3 Tree Trimming 36 EA $ 26.50 $ 954.00
4 Irrigation Repair (total area) 16,457 SF $ 0.10 $ 1,645.70 5 Re-Plant Area (dirt area) 2,490 SF $ 0.15 $ 373.50
$ 4,788.91
1 Cal Water Irrigation 1 YR $ 6,420.00 $ 6,420.00
2 PG&E 1 YR $ 70.00 $ 70.00
3 Streetlights (30W) 24 EA $ 156.34 $ 3,752.06
1 Recording Fee 88 LOT $ 0.16 $ 14.08
2 Public Notice 88 LS $ 0.29 $ 25.52
3 Professional Services - Eng Report 88 LOT $ 10.00 $ 880.00 4 Supplies 0.4 AC $ 539.75 $ 203.92
5 Equipment 0.4 AC $ 9.50 $ 3.59
6 Backflow Testing/Repair 3 EA $ 75.00 $ 225.00
$ 16,383.08

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Maintenance Costs
Utility Costs
Incidental Costs

TOTAL ESTIMATE
F:\2025\25-187\Excel\25-187 Est Costs 25-26.xlsx
345
City of Selma LLMD Engineer's Report 2985 North Burl Ave., Suite 101 Zone #6 Fresno, CA 93727
City of Selma (559) 244-3121
Date: 6/3/2025
Prepared by: DH

ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 Turf Maintenance (turf area) 0 SF $ 0.13 $ -
2 Plant Maintenance (plant area) 9,674 SF $ 0.13 $ 1,257.63 3 Tree Trimming 15 EA $ 26.50 $ 397.50
4 Irrigation Repair (total area) 9,674 SF $ 0.10 $ 967.41 5 Re-Plant Area (dirt area) 0 SF $ 0.15 $ -
$ 2,622.54
1 Cal Water Irrigation 1 YR $ 1,850.00 $ 1,850.00
2 PG&E 1 YR $ 70.00 $ 70.00
3 Streetlights 15 EA $ 156.34 $ 2,345.04
1 Recording Fee 63 LOT $ 0.16 $ 10.08
2 Public Notice 63 LS $ 0.29 $ 18.27
3 Professional Services - Eng Report 63 LOT $ 10.00 $ 630.00 4 Supplies 0.2 AC $ 539.75 $ 119.87
5 Equipment 0.2 AC $ 9.50 $ 2.11
6 Backflow Testing/Repair 1 EA $ 75.00 $ 75.00
$ 7,742.91

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Maintenance Costs
Utility Costs
Incidental Costs

TOTAL ESTIMATE
F:\2025\25-187\Excel\25-187 Est Costs 25-26.xlsx
346
City of Selma LLMD Engineer's Report 2985 North Burl Ave., Suite 101 Zone #7 Fresno, CA 93727
City of Selma (559) 244-3121
Date: 6/3/2025
Prepared by: DH

ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 Turf Maintenance (turf area) 7,113 SF $ 0.13 $ 924.69 2 Plant Maintenance (plant area) 2,453 SF $ 0.13 $ 318.89 3 Tree Trimming 27 EA $ 26.50 $ 715.50
4 Irrigation Repair (total area) 9,566 SF $ 0.10 $ 956.60 5 Re-Plant Area (dirt area) 0 SF $ 0.15 $ -
$ 2,915.68
1 Cal Water Irrigation 1 YR $ 3,680.00 $ 3,680.00
2 PG&E 1 YR $ 70.00 $ 70.00
3 Streetlights (30W) 33 EA $ 156.34 $ 5,159.09
1 Recording Fee 172 LOT $ 0.16 $ 27.52
2 Public Notice 172 LS $ 0.29 $ 49.88
3 Professional Services - Eng Report 172 LOT $ 10.00 $ 1,720.00 4 Supplies 0.2 AC $ 539.75 $ 118.53
5 Equipment 0.2 AC $ 9.50 $ 2.09
6 Backflow Testing/Repair 2 EA $ 75.00 $ 150.00
$ 13,892.79

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Maintenance Costs
Utility Costs
Incidental Costs

TOTAL ESTIMATE
F:\2025\25-187\Excel\25-187 Est Costs 25-26.xlsx
347
City of Selma LLMD Engineer's Report 2985 North Burl Ave., Suite 101 Zone #8 Fresno, CA 93727
City of Selma (559) 244-3121
Date: 6/3/2025
Prepared by: DH

ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 Turf Maintenance (turf area) 51,422 SF $ 0.13 $ 6,684.86 2 Plant Maintenance (plant area) 17,012 SF $ 0.13 $ 2,211.56 3 Tree Trimming 40 EA $ 26.50 $ 1,060.00
4 Irrigation Repair (total area) 75,248 SF $ 0.10 $ 7,524.80 5 Re-Plant Area (dirt area) 6,814 SF $ 0.15 $ 1,022.10
$ 18,503.32
1 Cal Water Irrigation 1 YR $ 20,810.00 $ 20,810.00
2 PG&E 1 YR $ 80.00 $ 80.00
3 Streetlights (HPSV 70W) 5 EA $ 125.77 $ 628.86
4 Streetlights (LED 30W LS1-E) 32 EA $ 156.34 $ 5,002.75 5 Streetlights (LED 30W) 21 EA $ 50.58 $ 1,062.18
1 Recording Fee 254 LOT $ 0.16 $ 40.64
2 Public Notice 254 LS $ 0.29 $ 73.66
3 Professional Services - Eng Report 254 LOT $ 10.00 $ 2,540.00 4 Supplies 1.7 AC $ 539.75 $ 932.39
5 Equipment 1.7 AC $ 9.50 $ 16.41
6 Backflow Testing/Repair 4 EA $ 75.00 $ 300.00
$ 49,990.22

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Maintenance Costs
Utility Costs
Incidental Costs

TOTAL ESTIMATE
F:\2025\25-187\Excel\25-187 Est Costs 25-26.xlsx
348
City of Selma LLMD Engineer's Report 2985 North Burl Ave., Suite 101 Zone #9 Fresno, CA 93727
City of Selma (559) 244-3121
Date: 6/3/2025
Prepared by: DH

ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 Turf Maintenance (turf area) 0 SF $ 0.13 $ -
2 Plant Maintenance (plant area) 0 SF $ 0.13 $ -
3 Tree Trimming 0 EA $ 26.50 $ -
4 Irrigation Repair (total area) 3,092 SF $ 0.10 $ 309.20 5 Re-Plant Area (dirt area) 3,092 SF $ 0.15 $ 463.80
$ 773.00
1 Cal Water Irrigation 1 YR $ 900.00 $ 900.00
2 PG&E 1 YR $ 10.00 $ 10.00
3 Streetlights (30W) 28 EA $ 156.34 $ 4,377.41
4 Streetlights (60W) 1 EA $ 199.73 $ 199.73
5 Streetlights (30W LS-1A) 19 EA $ 125.60 $ 2,386.48
6 Streetlights (HPSV 70W) 5 EA $ 125.77 $ 628.86
7 Streetlights (LED 35W) 18 EA $ 50.58 $ 910.44
1 Recording Fee 153 LOT $ 0.16 $ 24.48
2 Public Notice 153 LS $ 0.29 $ 44.37
3 Professional Services - Eng Report 153 LOT $ 10.00 $ 1,530.00 4 Supplies 0.1 AC $ 539.75 $ 38.31
5 Equipment 0.1 AC $ 9.50 $ 0.67
6 Backflow Testing/Repair 0 EA $ 75.00 $ -
$ 11,823.75

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Maintenance Costs
Utility Costs
Incidental Costs

TOTAL ESTIMATE
F:\2025\25-187\Excel\25-187 Est Costs 25-26.xlsx
349
City of Selma LLMD Engineer's Report 2985 North Burl Ave., Suite 101 Zone #11 Fresno, CA 93727
City of Selma (559) 244-3121
Date: 6/3/2025
Prepared by: DH

ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 Turf Maintenance (turf area) 8,068 SF $ 0.13 $ 1,048.84 2 Plant Maintenance (plant area) 13,766 SF $ 0.13 $ 1,789.58 3 Tree Trimming 39 EA $ 26.50 $ 1,033.50
4 Irrigation Repair (total area) 21,834 SF $ 0.10 $ 2,183.40 5 Re-Plant Area (dirt area) 0 SF $ 0.15 $ -
$ 6,055.32
1 Cal Water Irrigation 1 YR $ 4,775.00 $ 4,775.00
2 PG&E 1 YR $ 160.00 $ 160.00
3 Streetlights (30W) 19 EA $ 156.34 $ 2,970.38
1 Recording Fee 59 LOT $ 0.16 $ 9.44
2 Public Notice 59 LS $ 0.29 $ 17.11
3 Professional Services - Eng Report 59 LOT $ 10.00 $ 590.00 4 Supplies 0.5 AC $ 539.75 $ 270.54
5 Equipment 0.5 AC $ 9.50 $ 4.76
6 Backflow Testing/Repair 2 EA $ 75.00 $ 150.00
$ 15,002.56

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Maintenance Costs
Utility Costs
Incidental Costs

TOTAL ESTIMATE
F:\2025\25-187\Excel\25-187 Est Costs 25-26.xlsx
350
Page | 19

EXHIBIT B
Overall Assessment Diagram
351
Assessment Areas City Limits
#9 Vineyard Estates
#8 Rosewood (b)
#5 Suncrest (a)
#5 Suncrest (b)
#8 Rosewood (a)
#4 Dancer Meadows (a)
#4 Dancer Meadows (b)
#1 Nelson East (b)
#11 Royal Country
#1 Nelson East (a)
#6 Blossom Ranch
#3 Dinuba Thompson (b)
#3 Dinuba Thompson (c)
#3 Dinuba Thompson (a)
#7 Sundance Estates
#2 Nelson West (b) #2 Nelson West (c)
#2 Nelson West (d)
#2 Nelson West (a)
O
0 800 1,600
Feet

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx NOTE: FOR A MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF THE LOTS, PIECES, PARCELS, AND SUBDIVISIONS OF LANDS SHOWN ON THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS, REFERENCE IS MADE TO BOOKS 348, 358, 388, 389, & 390 OF ASSESSOR'S MAPS, COUNTY OF FRESNO, 2281 TULARE STREET, FRESNO, CALIFORNIA.

Assessment Area
Boundary
352
Page | 20

EXHIBIT C
Landscape and Lighting Diagram
353

SOUTHCROSS DR

MOUNTAIN DR

ORANGE AVE

HOPE ST

OLIVE ST

MULBERRY ST

GARFIELD ST

DOCKERY AVE

BOARDWALK

PARK PLACE

MOBILE DR

NORTHCROSS DR

STEPHANIE ST

TAMMY ST

DINUBA AVE

BLINKLEY DR

HILL ST

BELLA VISTA LN

VIA CORVINO WAY

WOODROW AVE

HILLCREST ST

LOVE ST

NORTHHILL ST

BURNHAM ST
DITCH
ST

NELSON BLVD

SARAH ST

DUKE AVE

TAMMY LN

STEPHANIE LN

GOLDRIDGE ST

HICKS ST

LEWIS ST

BARBARA ST

HUNTSMAN AVE

JACKSON ST
Legend:

Streetlights
Landscaping
Parcels
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
Nelson East
Zone 1
O
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 500 feet
Digitized landscape areas were derived from aerial images and are intended for visual representation only, not for construction or architectural use. 354

STEPHANIE ST

DINUBA AVE

DOCKERY AVE

NORTHVIEW ST

GARFIELD ST

OLIVE ST

SARAH ST

MULBERRY ST

STEPHANIE LN

DUKE AVE
Legend:

Streetlights
Landscaping
Parcels
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
Royal Country
Zone 11
O
0 100 200 400
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 200 feet
Digitized landscape areas were derived from aerial images and are intended for visual representation only, not for construction or architectural use. 355

WEBER AVE

NELSON BLVD ORYAN ST

DINUBA AVE

WRIGHT ST

CLEVELAND ST

SHERRI ST

BRYAN ST

JASPER CT
SNY
DER
S
T

JACEY ST

THOMPSON AVE

GAYNOR CIR

VAN HORN CIR

FLORAL AVE

CHANDLER CT
HIG
H
LAN
D AVE

GOLDEN STATE BLVD

KENT ST

TAMMY ST

NORTHHILL ST
MITC
H
ELL AV
E

STEPHANIE ST

KELLY CIR

AZALEA ST

STEPHANIE LN

BURNHAM ST

JASPER ST

TAMMY LN
OAK ST

GOLDRIDGE ST

HUNTSMAN AVE

LEWIS ST

GAYNOR ST

NORTHVIEW ST

HICKS ST

FANCHER AVE
PR
M
I

ROSE ST

MC KENNA ST

ALTON ST

MAPLE ST

CYPRESS ST

BALBOA ST

LEONARD AVE

HILLCREST ST

CORTLEY AVE

FRONT ST PHEASANT RUN DR

CLAY CT

SARAH ST

COLUMBIA ST

JORDAN ST

SARAH CIR

ART GONZALES PKWY

WILLOW AVE

HOWARD ST

JACKSON ST

DENNIS ST

BARBARA ST

ASPEN ST

SIERRA VIEW AVE

KHAN AVE

OSTLER AVE

SHAFT ST

WHITSON ST
Legend:

Streetlights
Landscaping
Parcels
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
Nelson West
Zone 2
O
0 450 900 1,800
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 900 feet
Digitized landscape areas were derived from aerial images and are intended for visual representation only, not for construction or architectural use. 356

DINUBA AVE

SHERRI ST

BRYAN ST

TAMMY LN

JASPER CT

HICKS ST

SIERRA VIEW AVE SNYDER ST

GOLDRIDGE ST WILLOW AVE

SARAH ST

GAYNOR CIR

VAN HORN CIR

HOWARD ST

WRIGHT ST

GAYNOR ST

TAMMY ST

THOMPSON AVE STEPHANIE ST KELLY CIR

STEPHANIE LN

MITCHELL AVE

NORTHVIEW ST

PRIMROSE ST

SARAH CIR

JASPER ST
Legend:

Streetlights
Landscaping
Parcels
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
Dinuba Thompson
Zone 3
O
0 205 410 820
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 400 feet
Digitized landscape areas were derived from aerial images and are intended for visual representation only, not for construction or architectural use. 357

GARY ST

FLORAL AVE
LE
E ST

WRIGHT ST

LOGAN ST

MCCALL AVE
JOY CT
E ST
FAI
TH ST

HUNTSMAN AVE

BARBARA ST

COOPER ST
D ST
B ST
C ST
JOY ST

ALLAN ST

HOPE ST
A ST

ALTON CT

CYPRESS ST

MAPLE ST

LOVE ST

JACKSON ST
OAK ST

ALTON ST

ASPEN ST

DENNIS ST
Legend:

Streetlights
Landscaping
Parcels
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
Dancer Meadows
Zone 4
O
0 205 410 820
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 400 feet
Digitized landscape areas were derived from aerial images and are intended for visual representation only, not for construction or architectural use. 358
D ST

ORANGE AVE

GOLDEN STATE BLVD

ARRANTS ST

TULARE ST

STILLMAN ST

COUNTRY ROSE LN

GROVE ST

CENTER ST
DOCKE
RY AVE
C
OUN
T
RY CL
UB L
N

ROSE AVE

PRAIRIE ST

PACIFIC AVE

LOCUST ST

ZELKOVIA LN

WALNUT ST
O

LIVE ST

PARK ST

FRONT ST

PINE ST

ORCHARD ST

MILL ST

EVERGREEN ST

COUNTRYVIEW ST

NEBRASKA AVE

PEACH ST

PLUM ST

RORDEN ST

REDWOOD LN

ALMOND ST
FIG ST

CHAPARAL LN

RODEO ST
Legend:

Streetlights
Landscaping
Parcels
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
Suncrest
Zone 5
O
0 275 550 1,100
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 550 feet
Digitized landscape areas were derived from aerial images and are intended for visual representation only, not for construction or architectural use. 359

BLINKLEY DR

SOUTHCROSS DR

DUKE AVE

GARFIELD ST

MOUNTAIN DR B CT

MULBERRY ST

PARK PLACE

OLIVE ST
MO

TAMMY LN

BILE DR

STEPHANIE LN

HICKS ST

GOLDRIDGE ST

NORTHCROSS DR

DINUBA AVE
Legend:

Streetlights
Landscaping
Parcels
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
Blossom Ranch
Zone 6
O
0 100 200 400
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 200 feet
Digitized landscape areas were derived from aerial images and are intended for visual representation only, not for construction or architectural use. 360

THOMPSON AVE

NORTHVIEW ST

TAMMY LN

DINUBA AVE

SARAH CIR

NORTHHILL ST

CLEVELAND ST

SHERRI ST

BRYAN ST

JASPER CT

SNYDER ST

MITCHELL AVE

JACEY ST

HICKS ST

SARAH ST

TAMMY ST

STEPHANIE ST

KELLY CIR

GOLDRIDGE ST

PRIMROSE ST
MC K
ENNA
S
T

HILLCREST ST

JASPER ST
Legend:

Streetlights
Landscaping
Parcels
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
Sundance Estates
Zone 7
O
0 150 300 600
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 300 feet
Digitized landscape areas were derived from aerial images and are intended for visual representation only, not for construction or architectural use. 361

NEBRASKA AVE

SECOND ST

ROSE AVE

THIRD ST

FIRST ST

KNOWLES ST

SYLVIA ST

FOURTH ST

YOUNG ST

BRANCH ST
MIT

CHELL AVE

HIGH ST

SNYDER ST

PINE ST

CLEVELAND ST

BAUDER ST

VALLEY VIEW AVE

PARK ST
GAYNOR

SKELTON ST
S
T

THOMPSON AVE
VA
N HO
R
N
S
T

SHERIDAN ST

VALLEY VIEW ST

NORTH ST

WILSON ST

SHERMAN ST

YERBA CT

MAGNOLIA ST

WHITSON ST

HIGHLAND AVE

SHASTA CT

CLOVER ST SHAFT ST

BLAINE ST

SEQUOIA ST
ASH ST

FERN CT

JASPER ST

SAN CARLOS ST

ALMOND ST
E
V
E
R
GRE
EN ST

MASON ST

MILL ST

YERBA ST

FRONT ST

SYCAMORE ST

BIRCH ST

SAGINAW AVE

JOHN ST

BERRY ST

PEACH ST
FIG ST

NECTARINE ST

WALNUT ST

SUNSET ST

ADOBE ST

BLAINE AVE
Legend:

Streetlights
Landscaping
Parcels
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
Rosewood
Zone 8
O
0 375 750 1,500
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 750 feet
Digitized landscape areas were derived from aerial images and are intended for visual representation only, not for construction or architectural use. 362

CLEVELAND ST

VALLEY VIEW ST

MITCHELL AVE

YERBA CT

HIGHLAND AVE

SHASTA CT

SAGINAW AVE

CLOVER ST

SHAFT ST

BLAINE ST
ASH ST

FERN CT

BIRCH ST

PARK ST

YERBA ST

BLAINE AVE

BERRY ST
Legend:

Streetlights
Landscaping
Parcels
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
Vineyard Estates
Zone 9
O
0 150 300 600
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 300 feet
Digitized landscape areas were derived from aerial images and are intended for visual representation only, not for construction or architectural use. 363
Page | 21

EXHIBIT D
Address Diagram
364
1328
1322
1316
1310
1304
1327
1321
1315
1309
1303
1326
1320
1314
1308
1302
1331
1325
1319
1313
1307
13011337
3701
3707
3713
3719
3725
3731
3737
3743
3803
3809
3815
3821 3827
3833 3834 3828
3822
3816
3810
3804
3744
3738
3732 3737
3733 37413745
3749
3753
3757
3821
3817 38253829
3831
3835
3839
1260
1254
1248
1242
1236
1230
1224
1218
1212
1206
1122
1116
1110
1104
1042
1036
1030
1255
1249
1243
1237
1231
1225
1219
1213
1207
1256
1250
1244
1238
1232
1226
1220
1214
1208
1253
1247
1241
1235
1229
1223
1217
3719
3716
3722
3804
3810
3816
3822 3819
3813
3807
3801
3723
3717
3718
3802
3806
3812
3712
1022
1016
1025
1019
1031
3705
3711
3710
3704
3707
3713
1246
1240
1234
12281222 1216 1215
1221
1245
1239
1233
1227
1248
1242
1236
1230
1224
1218
3610 3604
1124
1118
1112
1106
1255
1249
1243
1237
1231
1225
1024
1018
1012
1006
1002
1003
3814
3808
3802
1011
1023
1017
3807
3813

DOCKERY AVE

NELSON BLVD

HILL ST

DINUBA AVE

STEPHANIE ST

TAMMY ST

HILL ST

BELLA VISTA LN

VIA CORVINO WAY

OLIVE ST

WOODROW AVE

HILLCRESTST

SARAH ST

TAMMY LN

DITCH ST

HICKS ST

OLIVE ST OLIVE ST

TAMMY ST

NORTHHILL ST

HICKS ST

NORTHVIEW ST

GOLDRIDGE ST

ORANGE AVE
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#1 Nelson East (a)
O
0 175 350 700
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 350 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
365
3320
3314
3308
3294
3288
3282
3276
1332
1326
1320
13141308
1302
1325
1319
1313
1307
1301
1331 1330
1324
1318
1312
1306
1300
1497
3416
3410
1452 144614401434
1428
1422 141614101404
1398
1392 1386
3437
3443
1455
1491
1485
1479
1473
1467
1461
1455
1449
1443
1437
1431
1425
1417
1413
1407
3403
1454
1448
1442
1438
1432
1424
1418
1412
1406
1398
1445
3446
3440
3434
3428
3410
1592
3507
3513
3519
3525
3531
3537
3547
1456
1450
1444
1438
1432
1426
1420
1414
1408
1398
1392
1386
1380
1374
1368
1455
3524
3518
3512
35063500
1492
1486
1480
1474
1468
1462
1456
1450
1444
1438
1449
3523
3517
3511
3505 3506
3512
3518
3524
1431 1421
3521
3515
3509
3503 3504
3510
3516
3522
1415 3525
3519
3513
3507
3501 3502
3508
3514
3520
3526 3523
3521
3515
3513
3511
1350
1357
3487
3475
3463
3451
3439
3427
3424
3436
3448
3460 3472
1297
3502 1298 1251
1245
1239
1233
1227
1221
1215
3538
3544
3550
1123
1117
1111
1252
1246
1240
1234
1228
1222
3401/3403
3405/3407
3409/3411
3413/3415
3417/3419
3421/3423
3425/3427
3429/3431
3433/3435
3437/3439

HOPE ST

SOUTHCROSS DR

BOARDWALK

PARK PLACE

NORTHCROSS DRBLINKLEY DR

ORANGE AVE

HILL ST

OLIVE ST

MULBERRY ST
DITCH
ST

GARFIELD ST

WOODROW AVE

DOCKERY AVE

HILLCREST ST

NORTHHILL ST

BURNHAM ST

LOVE ST
OLIVE
ST

NELSON BLVD

NORTHHILL ST

JACKSON ST

GOLDRIDGE ST

LEWIS ST

GOLDRIDGE ST

BARBARA ST

HUNTSMAN AVE

JACKSON ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#1 Nelson East (b)
O
0 175 350 700
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 350 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
366
3901
3907
3913
3919
3925
3926 3931
3920
39143908
3902
39033900 3909
3915
3921
3927 1476
1470
1464
1458
1452
14461440 3938
3932
3926
3920
3914 1349
1343
3911
3917
3923
3939
3945
1334
1328
1322
1316
1310
1304
1327
1321
1315
1309
1303
1326
1320
1314
1308
1302
1337
1331
1325
1319
1313
1307
1301

STEPHANIE ST

DINUBA AVE

DOCKERY AVE

NORTHVIEW ST

GARFIELD ST

OLIVE ST OLIVE ST

SARAH ST

MULBERRY ST

STEPHANIE LN

NORTHVIEW ST

DUKE AVE
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#11 Royal Country
O
0 100 200 400
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 200 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
367
3748
3742
3736
3730
3724
3627
3633
3721
3727
3621
3615
3609
3603
3602
3608
3614
3620
3714
3720
3726 3723 3724 3721
3715
3707
3703
3631
3625
3619
3107
3023
3017
3011
3005
3004
3010
3016
3630
3704
3710
3716
3722
3220
3214
3208
3202
3130
3124
3118
3112
3106
31003226 3737
3731
3725
3718
3112
3118
3124
3718
3712
3706
3618
3612
3606
3605
3611
3617
3623
3705
3711
3717
3113
3119
3125
3514
3508
3502
3489
3507
3513
3519
3520
3514
3508
3502
3590
3484
3111
3105
3117
3123
3485
3491
3503
3509
3515
3521
3527
3533
3538 3532
3526
3520

FANCHER AVE

NELSON BLVD

GOLDRIDGE ST

CHANDLER CT

CHANDLER CT

KENT ST

CORTLEY AVE

HIGHLAND AVE

BALBOA ST

CLAY CT

NORTHHILL ST

COLUMBIA ST

KHAN AVE

GOLDEN STATE BLVD
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#2 Nelson West (a)
O
0 125 250 500
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 250 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 348
368
2755
3497
3489
3477
3465
3453
3441
3433
3421
2925 2913
2901
2885
2873
2861
3412
3424
3436
3448
3460
3472
3484
3495 3496
3487
3475
3463
3451
3439
3426 3427
3438
3450
3462
3474
3486
3498
3518
3524
3536
3548
3602
3608
36163624
2832
2968
2964286028562852284828442840
28362972
2976
2971
2969
3607
3547
3535
3531
3527
2974
2861
2857285328492845
2841
2837
2862
28582854285028462842
2838
2863
28592855285128472843
2839
3523
3517
2860
2856
2852
2848
2844
3530
3526

NELSON BLVD

JACEY ST

ORYAN ST

HIGHLAND AVE

NORTHHILL ST

NORTHHILL ST

HILLCREST ST

BURNHAM ST

CLEVELAND ST

SHAFT ST

NORTHHILL ST

HUNTSMAN AVE
P
H
E
A
SAN
T
RUN DR

JORDAN ST

SHAFT ST

HILLCREST ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#2 Nelson West (b)
O
0 100 200 400
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 200 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
369
2707
2701
3453
3449
3445
3441
3437
3433
3429
3425
3421
3417
3413
3409
3405
3401
2615
2611
3458
3452
3448
3444
3440
3436
3432
3428
3424
3420
3416 2616 2612
2608
2602
3415
3419
3423
3427
3431
3435
3439
3443
3447
3451
3455 2607 2601
3447
3441
2573
2569
2565
2581
2577
3458
3446
3438 3430
3420
3414 2582 2578
2574
2570
2566
3459
3453
2509
3452
3448
3444
3440
2543
2731
2727
2723
2719
2715
2711
2729
2725
2721
2717 3402
3406
3410
3414
3418
3422
3426
3430
3434
3438
3442
2718
2714
2719 2720 3415
3419
3423
2722
3427
34312726
2720
27142732
2738 2737
2731
2725
2719
2713
2722
2716
27102728
2734 2735
2729
2723
2717
2711
2610
2604
2540
2534
2528
2522
2516
2510
2504
3651
3644 3645
3650
2708
2658
2652
2646
2707
2651
2645
2639
2633
2627
2621
2615
2609
2603
2535
2529
2523
2517
2511
2505 2502
2648
2642
2636
2630
2624
2618
2612
2606
2600
2532
2526
2520
2514
2508
2704 2705
2649
2643
2637
2631
2625
2619
2613
2607
2601
2539
2533
2527
2521
2515
2509
2503
2726

MITCHELL AVE

GOLDRIDGE ST

NORTHHILL ST

HUNTSMAN AVE

BURNHAM ST

SNYDER ST

BRYAN ST

ORYAN ST

SHERRI ST

JASPER CT

JACEY ST

THOMPSON AVE

GOLDRIDGE ST

BURNHAM ST

NELSON BLVD

KELLY CIR

SNYDER ST

MC KENNA ST

HILLCREST ST

PHEASANT RUN DR

JACKSON ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#2 Nelson West (c)
O
0 125 250 500
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 250 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
370
2366
2360
2354
2348
2342
2336
2330
2324
2318
2312
2306 2300
2307
2433
2427
2421
2415
2409
2403
2367
2361
2355
2349
2343
2337
2331
2325
2319
2313
2439 2438
2432
2426
2420
2414
2408
2402

HUNTSMAN AVE

NELSON BLVD

HILLCREST ST

JACKSON ST WRIGHT ST

THOMPSON AVE

GAYNOR ST

AZALEA ST

BURNHAM ST

WILLOW AVE

GAYNOR ST
HOWARD ST Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#2 Nelson West (d)
O
0 100 200 400
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 200 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
371
2652
2646
2640
2634
2628
2622
2616
2610
2606
2566
2560
2554
2548
2565
2559
2553
3935
3929
2564
2558
2552
3930
3936
2639
2633
2627
2621
2615
2609
2605
2638
2632
2626
2620
2614
2608
3925
3919
3913
3908 3907
3914
3920
3926
2631
2625
2619
2563
2557
2551
2545
2539
2533
2517
2511
2505
3920
39263932
3939 3938 3933
3927
3922 3921
3928
3934
3940
3909
3915
3921
3927
3933
3939
3945
3951

NORTHVIEW ST

DINUBA AVE

SARAH CIR

SIERRA VIEW AVE SNYDER ST

SARAH ST

STEPHANIE ST

SNYDER ST

THOMPSON AV
E

KELLY CIR

PRIMROSE ST

MITCHELL AVE

JASPER ST

JASPER ST

SARAH ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#3 Dinuba Thompson (a)
O
0 110 220 440
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 217 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
372
2449
2443
2437
2431
2425
2419
2413 2407
2401 2402
2408
2450
2444
2438
2432
2426
2420
2414
2451
2445243924332427242124152409240323972391238523792373236723612355 2349
2452 2440
3978 3977
2428
242224162410240423982392238623802374236823622356
2350
23872381
23752369
2363
2357
2351
2399
2393
2429
2423
2417
2411
2405
2436
2430
2424
2418
2412
2406
2400
2394
2388
2382
2376
2370
2364
2358
2352

SARAH ST

DINUBA AVE

WILLOW AVE

HOWARD ST

WRIGHT ST

GAYNOR CIR

VAN HORN CIR

THOMPSON AVE

STEPHANIE LN

WILLOW AVE

NORTHVIEW ST

WRIGHT ST

SARAH CIR

SIERRA VIEW AVE
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#3 Dinuba Thompson (b)
O
0 100 200 400
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 200 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
373
3828
3822
3816
3810
3804 3801
3807
3813
3819
3825 3826
2410 2402
3827 3824
2390 2384
3829 3828
3824 3823
3817
3818
3814
3810
3806
3802 3801
3805
3809
3813
3817

THOMPSON AVE
3808
2407
2401
2395
2389
2385
2381
2377
2373
2369

WILLOW AVE

WRIGHT ST

SARAH ST

HICKS ST

DINUBA AVE

TAMMY LN

WILLOW AVE

GAYNOR CIR

VAN HORN CIR
HOWARD
S
T

WRIGHT ST

GAYNOR ST

STEPHANIE LN

NORTHVIEW ST

SARAH CIR
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#3 Dinuba Thompson (c)
O
0 100 200 400
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 200 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
374
2121
2115
2105
2053
2045
2037
2029
2021
2015
2003
2116
2108
2102
2048
2040
2030
2024
2016
2008
2004
2259
2251
2223
2217220721452137
2129
2260
225222242218220821462138
2124
2019
2011
2003
2035
2027
2111
2103
2051
2043
2104
2058
2044
2036
2028
2257
2239
2221221522052143
2135
2127
2258
225022222216
2206
2144
2136
2128
2256
2238
2116
2108
2102
2048
2040
2030
2024
2016
2008
2004
2220
2214
2204214221342126

WRIGHT ST

ASPEN ST

ALTON CT MCCALL AVE MCCALL AVE
LEE ST

LOGAN ST

ALLAN ST

CYPRESS ST

MAPLE ST
OAK ST

ALTON ST

ASPEN ST

DENNIS ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#4 Dancer Meadows (a)
O
0 100 200 400
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 200 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
375
1914
1908
1902
1822
1816
1810
1804
1718
1712
1706
1823
1817
1811
1805
1719
1713
1707
1913
1907
1901
1815
1809
18031717
1711
1705
1814
18081802
17161710
1704
3068
3062
3056
3050
3044
3038
3032
3026 3025
3031
3037
3043
3049
30553061
1624
161816121606
3048
3042
3036
3030
3024
3047
3041
3035
3029
3018
3012
3008
3002
1714
1708
1818
1812
1806
1720
1819
1813
1807
1721
1715
1709
1631
1625
1619
1613
1607
1601
3134
3140
3148
3156
3164
3172
1925
1919
1913
1907
1833
1827
1821
1815
1809
1729
1723
1717
1711
1705
1621
1615
3165
3157
3149
3141
31423150
3159 3158
3151
1820
1814
1808
1722
1716
1912
1832
18261918
1924 1923
1917
1911
1905
1910
1904

MCCALL AVE
JOY CT

MAPLE ST

FAITH ST

E ST MULBERRY ST

COOPER ST

MAPLE ST

ALTON ST
OAK ST

ASPEN ST

DENNIS ST

BARBARA ST

BARBARA ST

LEWIS ST

COOPER ST

ALTON ST

GARY ST

ASPEN ST D ST
JOY ST

ALTON ST

MCCALL AVE
A ST
D ST

ALTON CT
JOY ST

LOVE ST
OAK ST

ASPEN ST

LOVE STOAK ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#4 Dancer Meadows (b)
O
0 125 250 500
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 250 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
376
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023
2027
2031
1348
1344
1340
1336
1332
1328
1324
1320
1316
1312
1308
2026
2022
2018
2014
1309
1317
1313
1341
1337
1333
1329
1325
1321
1342
1338
1334
1330
1326
1322
1318
1343
1339
1335
1331
1327
1323
1319

OLIVE ST

DOCKERY AVE

NEBRASKA AVE

WALNUT ST

OLIVE ST

ORCHARD ST

PLUM ST

ALMOND ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#5 Suncrest (a)
O
0 65 130 260
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 133 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 389
377
2439
2505
2511
2517
2523
1015
1009
1003
2516
2510
2504
2438
2435 2432
2441
2503
2509
2515
2518
2512
2506
2442
24361021 2529
1001
1007
2415
2421
2427
2433
2428
24222416
1010
2423
2429 2426
2420
2414
1044 2403 COUNTRYROSELN

COUNTRY CLUB LN

PRAIRIE ST

ZELKOVIA LN

REDWOOD LN

ROSE AVE

CHAPARAL LN

RODEO ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#5 Suncrest (b)
O
0 110 220 440
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 217 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 389
378
3607
3613
3705
3711
3717
3723
3729
3735
1460
1454
1448
1442
1436
1430 1429
1459
1453
1447
1441
1435
1458
1452
1446
1440
1434
1428 1427
1457
1451
1445
1439
1433
37413803
1468
1462
1456
1450
1444
1469
1463
1457
1451
1445
1475 1476
1470
1464
1458
1452
1446
3840
3834
3828
3822
3816
3810
1461
1455
1449
1443
1437
1431

BLINKLEY DR

SOUTHCROSS DR

DUKE AVE

GARFIELD ST

HICKS ST

GOLDRIDGE ST

MOUNTAIN DR B CT

MULBERRY ST

PARK PLACE

OLIVE ST

MOBILE DR

TAMMY LN

STEPHANIE LN

HICKS ST

GOLDRIDGE ST

NORTHCROSS DR

DINUBA AVE
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#6 Blossom Ranch
O
0 100 200 400
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 200 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
379
2650
2644
2638
2632
3850
3844
3838
3832
3826
3820
3814
2629
3808
2683
2671
2665
2659
2653
2647
2641
2635
2678
2672
2666
2660
2654
2648
2642
2636
2675
2667
2661
2655
2649
2643
2637
2674
2668
2662
37353741
2620
2614
2608
2552
2546
2540
37363742
2654
2670
2662
2528
2522
2516
2510
2613
2607
2551
2545
2539
2533
2527
2521
2515
2509
2514
2508
2520
2526
2532
2612
2606
2550
2544
2538
3723
3717
3711
3705
3724
3718
3712
3706
3704
3710
3716 3715
3709
3703
3702
3708
3714
2525
2519
2513
2507
2682 2689
2681
2673
2665
2686
2678
2670
2662
3702
3708
3714 3715
3709
3703
3713
3719
3725
3731
3737
3743
3749
2748
2740
2732
2724
2716
2708
2700
2690
2753
2745
2731
2729
2721
2713
2705
2697
2754
2746
2738
2730
2722
2714
2706
2694
3703 3709
3716 3715 3710
3705 3704
3711
3714 3717
2761
3708
2777
2767
26802686
3851
3845
3839
3833
3827
3821
3815
3809 3707
3701
2691 2684
2681

THOMPSON AVE

MITCHELL AVE

NORTHVIEW ST

TAMMY LN

DINUBA AVE

HICKS ST

SARAH CIR

GOLDRIDGE ST

NORTHHILL ST

MITCHELL AVE

CLEVELAND ST

SHERRI ST

BRYAN ST

JASPER CT

SNYDER ST

JACEY ST

HICKS ST

SNYDER ST

CLEVELAND ST

SARAH ST

TAMMY ST

STEPHANIE ST

KELLY CIR

HICKS ST

JASPER ST

GOLDRIDGE ST

MITCHELL AVE

NORTHHILL ST

HILLCREST ST

PRIMROSE ST

MC KENNA ST

HILLCREST ST

SARAH ST

JASPER ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#7 Sundance Estates
O
0 150 300 600
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 300 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 358
380
2349
2343
2337
2331
2325
23192313
2757
2751
2745
2739
2766
2760
2754
2748
2742
2351
2345
2339
2333
23272321
2805
2811
2829
2823
2817
2822
2816
2810
2804
2778
2772
2252
2302
2308 2307
2301
2251
2347
2341
2335
2329
2762
2756
2750
2744
2738
2732
2726
2759
2753
2747
2741
2735 2734
2740
2746
2826
2820
2814
2808
2758
2752 2832
2838
2837
2831
2825
2819
2813
2807
2824
2818
2812
2806 2830
2315
2309
2303
2261
2204
2210
2216
2222
2228
2234
2240
2246 2245
2239
2233
2227
2221
2215
2209
2203
2767
2761
2755
2749
2743
2747
2741
2753
2759
2765
2764
2758
2752
2746
2740
2818
2812
2806
2800
2774
2768
2762
2756
2748
2742
2736
2831
2825
2819
2813 2807
2801 2802
2808
2814
2832
2826
2820
2821
2815
2809
2803
2779
2773
2201
2207
2213
2219
2225
2231
2237
2243
2249
2255

ROSE AVE

MITCHELL AVE

PINE ST

PEACH ST

HIGHLAND AVE

BERRY ST

CLEVELAND ST

SHAFT ST

PEACH ST

EVERGREEN ST

SEQUOIA ST

PINE ST
FIG ST

BERRY ST

EVERGREEN ST

PINE ST

PEACH ST

MILL ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#8 Rosewood (a)
O
0 110 220 440
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 217 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 388
381
2449
2443
2437
2431
2425
2419
2413
2341
2335
2329
2323
2317
2311
2424
2418
2412
2336
2330
2326
2320
2314
2308
2302 2434 2428 2440
2447
2441
2435
2429
2423
2417
2411
2333
2327
2321
2315
2309
2237
2231
2225
2219
2213
2207
2434
2428
2422
2416
2410
2336
2330
2324
2318
2312
2306
2234
2228
2222
2216
2210
2204 2446 2233 2227 2221 2215 2209
2135
2129
2123
2230
2224
2218
2212
2206
2200
1734 1728
1722
1716
1710
1704
1638
1632
2433
2427
2421
2415
2409
2335
2329
2323
2317
2311
2305
2233
2227
2221
2215
2211
2205
1633
1627

THOMPSON AVE

GAYNOR ST

VAN HORN ST

SKELTON ST

BLAINE AVE

SKELTON ST

MAGNOLIA ST

SAN CARLOS ST

VALLEY VIEW AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ADOBE ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#8 Rosewood (b)
O
0 125 250 500
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 250 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 390
382
1777
1776
1783
1782
1788 17891795
2820
2814
2808
1807 1806
1808
1811
1813
1812
1814
1819 1818 1817
2822
2816
2810
2804
2732
2726
2819
2813
2807
2801
2735
2729
1804
2718
2724
2826
2820
2814
2808
2802
2736
2730
2832
1846
1840
1834
1828
1822
1816
1810
1805
1820
1705
1711
1717
1723
1729
17351741
2822
2816
2810
2804
2814
2808280227322726
2720
1719
1725
1732 1731 1726
1720
2803
2815
2809
2719
2813
2807
2801
2737
2731
2725
2812
2806
2800
2736
2730
2724
2718
2712
2706
2700
1703
1709
1715
1721
1727
1733
1739
2713 1716
1720
1724
1730
1736
1745
1751
1757
1763
1769
1775
2772
2766
2760
2754
2748
2742
2736
2730
2724
27182712
2717
2729
2723
2735 2734
2730
2724
2718
1748
1742
2817
2811
2805 2823 1761
1767 1766 1765
1771
1777
17832823
2815
2801
2771
2769
2757
2745

MITCHELL AVE

CLEVELAND ST

HIGHLAND AVE

VALLEY VIEW ST

YERBA CT

SHASTA CT

CLOVER ST

SHAFT ST

BLAINE ST
ASH ST

SAGINAW AVE

FERN CT

SHAFT ST

BERRY ST

BIRCH ST

PARK ST

YERBA ST

YERBA ST

BLAINE AVE

BERRY ST
Legend:

Parcels
City Limits
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1
#9 Vineyard Estates
O
0 150 300 600
Feet
Document Path: G:\Selma\ArcPro\Selma_LLMD\Selma_LLMD.aprx Updated: 5/21/2025
1 inch = 300 feet
Please Refer to the
Fresno County
Assessor's Map for lot
dimension
Assessor's Book Number 390
383
Page | 22

EXHIBIT E
Property Owner List & Assessment Roll
384
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 1
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-444-05 $82.85 3428 OLIVE ST 1
358-444-08 $82.85 3410 OLIVE ST 2
358-481-01 $82.85 1592 NELSON BLVD 3
358-481-02 $82.85 3507 MULBERRY ST 4
358-481-03 $82.85 3513 MULBERRY ST 5
358-481-04 $82.85 3519 MULBERRY ST 6
358-481-05 $82.85 3525 MULBERRY ST 7
358-481-06 $82.85 3531 MULBERRY ST 8
358-481-07 $82.85 3537 MULBERRY ST 9
358-481-08 $82.85 3547 MULBERRY ST 10
358-482-01 $82.85 1456 NORTHHILL ST 11
358-483-01 $82.85 1455 NORTHHILL ST 12
358-483-02 $82.85 3524 MULBERRY ST 13
358-483-03 $82.85 3518 MULBERRY ST 14
358-483-04 $82.85 3512 MULBERRY ST 15
358-483-05 $82.85 3506 MULBERRY ST 16
358-483-06 $82.85 3500 MULBERRY ST 17
358-442-16 $82.85 3437 OLIVE ST 18
358-442-17 $82.85 3443 OLIVE ST 19
358-442-18 $82.85 1455 NELSON BLVD 20
358-442-19 $82.85 1461 NELSON BLVD 21
358-442-20 $82.85 1467 NELSON BLVD 22
358-442-21 $82.85 1473 NELSON BLVD 23
358-442-22 $82.85 1479 NELSON BLVD 24
358-442-23 $82.85 1485 NELSON BLVD 25
358-442-24 $82.85 1491 NELSON BLVD 26
358-444-01 $82.85 1445 NELSON BLVD 27
358-444-02 $82.85 3446 OLIVE ST 28
358-444-03 $82.85 3440 OLIVE ST 29
358-444-04 $82.85 3434 OLIVE ST 30
358-483-07 $82.85 1492 NELSON BLVD 31
358-483-08 $82.85 1486 NELSON BLVD 32
358-483-09 $82.85 1480 NELSON BLVD 33
358-483-10 $82.85 1474 NELSON BLVD 34
358-483-11 $82.85 1468 NELSON BLVD 35
358-483-12 $82.85 1462 NELSON BLVD 36
358-483-13 $82.85 1456 NELSON BLVD 37
358-483-14 $82.85 1450 NELSON BLVD 38
358-483-15 $82.85 1444 NELSON BLVD 39
358-483-16 $82.85 1438 NELSON BLVD 40
358-426-01 $82.85 3320 OLIVE ST 41
358-426-02 $82.85 3314 OLIVE ST 42
358-426-03 $82.85 3308 OLIVE ST 43
358-426-04 $82.85 3294 OLIVE ST 44
358-426-05 $82.85 3288 OLIVE ST 45
358-426-06 $82.85 3282 OLIVE ST 46
385
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 1
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-426-07 $82.85 3276 OLIVE ST 47
358-426-08 $82.85 1332 BARBARA ST 48
358-426-09 $82.85 1326 BARBARA ST 49
358-426-10 $82.85 1320 BARBARA ST 50
358-426-11 $82.85 1314 BARBARA ST 51
358-426-12 $82.85 1308 BARBARA ST 52
358-426-13 $82.85 1302 BARBARA ST 53
358-426-14 $82.85 1301 JACKSON ST 54
358-426-15 $82.85 1307 JACKSON ST 55
358-426-16 $82.85 1313 JACKSON ST 56
358-426-17 $82.85 1319 JACKSON ST 57
358-426-18 $82.85 1325 JACKSON ST 58
358-426-19 $82.85 1331 JACKSON ST 59
358-426-20 $82.85 1330 JACKSON ST 60
358-426-21 $82.85 1324 JACKSON ST 61
358-426-22 $82.85 1318 JACKSON ST 62
358-426-23 $82.85 1312 JACKSON ST 63
358-426-24 $82.85 1306 JACKSON ST 64
358-426-25 $82.85 3309 ORANGE AVE 65
358-441-06 $82.85 3401 MULBERRY ST 66
358-441-07 $82.85 3403 MULBERRY ST 67
358-441-08 $82.85 3407 MULBERRY ST 68
358-441-09 $82.85 3405 MULBERRY ST 69
358-441-10 $82.85 3409 MULBERRY ST 70
358-441-11 $82.85 3411 MULBERRY ST 71
358-441-12 $82.85 3415 MULBERRY ST 72
358-441-13 $82.85 3413 MULBERRY ST 73
358-441-14 $82.85 3417 MULBERRY ST 74
358-441-15 $82.85 3419 MULBERRY ST 75
358-441-16 $82.85 3423 MULBERRY ST 76
358-441-17 $82.85 3421 MULBERRY ST 77
358-441-18 $82.85 3425 MULBERRY ST 78
358-441-19 $82.85 3427 MULBERRY ST 79
358-441-20 $82.85 3431 MULBERRY ST 80
358-441-21 $82.85 3429 MULBERRY ST 81
358-441-22 $82.85 3433 MULBERRY ST 82
358-441-23 $82.85 3435 MULBERRY ST 83
358-441-24 $82.85 3439 MULBERRY ST 84
358-441-25 $82.85 3437 MULBERRY ST 85
358-442-01 $82.85 1497 NELSON BLVD 86
358-442-02 $82.85 3416 MULBERRY ST 87
358-442-03 $82.85 3410 MULBERRY ST 88
358-442-04 $82.85 1452 BURNHAM ST 89
358-442-05 $82.85 1446 BURNHAM ST 90
358-442-06 $82.85 1440 BURNHAM ST 91
358-442-07 $82.85 1434 BURNHAM ST 92
386
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 1
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-442-08 $82.85 1428 BURNHAM ST 93
358-442-09 $82.85 1422 BURNHAM ST 94
358-442-10 $82.85 1416 BURNHAM ST 95
358-442-11 $82.85 1410 BURNHAM ST 96
358-442-12 $82.85 1404 BURNHAM ST 97
358-442-13 $82.85 1398 BURNHAM ST 98
358-442-14 $82.85 1392 BURNHAM ST 99
358-442-15 $82.85 1386 BURNHAM ST 100
358-443-01 $82.85 1455 BURNHAM ST 101
358-443-02 $82.85 1449 BURNHAM ST 102
358-443-03 $82.85 1443 BURNHAM ST 103
358-443-04 $82.85 1437 BURNHAM ST 104
358-443-05 $82.85 1431 BURNHAM ST 105
358-443-06 $82.85 1425 BURNHAM ST 106
358-443-07 $82.85 1417 BURNHAM ST 107
358-443-08 $82.85 1413 BURNHAM ST 108
358-443-09 $82.85 1407 BURNHAM ST 109
358-443-10 $82.85 3403 OLIVE ST 110
358-443-11 $82.85 1398 HUNTSMAN AVE 111
358-443-12 $82.85 1406 HUNTSMAN AVE 112
358-443-13 $82.85 1412 HUNTSMAN AVE 113
358-443-14 $82.85 1418 HUNTSMAN AVE 114
358-443-15 $82.85 1424 HUNTSMAN AVE 115
358-443-16 $82.85 1432 HUNTSMAN AVE 116
358-443-17 $82.85 1438 HUNTSMAN AVE 117
358-443-18 $82.85 1442 HUNTSMAN AVE 118
358-443-19 $82.85 1448 HUNTSMAN AVE 119
358-443-20 $82.85 1454 HUNTSMAN AVE 120
358-482-02 $82.85 1450 NORTHHILL ST 121
358-482-03 $82.85 1444 NORTHHILL ST 122
358-482-04 $82.85 1438 NORTHHILL ST 123
358-482-05 $82.85 1432 NORTHHILL ST 124
358-482-06 $82.85 1426 NORTHHILL ST 125
358-482-07 $82.85 1420 NORTHHILL ST 126
358-482-08 $82.85 1414 NORTHHILL ST 127
358-482-09 $82.85 1408 NORTHHILL ST 128
358-483-17 $82.85 1449 NORTHHILL ST 129
358-483-18 $82.85 3523 GARFIELD ST 130
358-483-19 $82.85 3517 GARFIELD ST 131
358-483-20 $82.85 3511 GARFIELD ST 132
358-483-21 $82.85 3505 GARFIELD ST 133
358-483-22 $82.85 3506 GARFIELD ST 134
358-483-23 $82.85 3512 GARFIELD ST 135
358-483-24 $82.85 3518 GARFIELD ST 136
358-483-25 $82.85 3524 GARFIELD ST 137
358-483-26 $82.85 1431 NORTHHILL ST 138
387
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 1
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-483-27 $82.85 1421 NORTHHILL ST 139
358-483-28 $82.85 3521 WOODROW ST 140
358-483-29 $82.85 3515 WOODROW ST 141
358-483-30 $82.85 3509 WOODROW ST 142
358-483-31 $82.85 3503 WOODROW ST 143
358-483-32 $82.85 3504 WOODROW ST 144
358-483-33 $82.85 3510 WOODROW ST 145
358-483-34 $82.85 3516 WOODROW ST 146
358-483-35 $82.85 3522 WOODROW ST 147
358-483-36 $82.85 1415 NORTHHILL ST 148
358-482-10 $82.85 1398 NORTHHILL ST 149
358-482-11 $82.85 1392 NORTHHILL ST 150
358-482-12 $82.85 1386 NORTHHILL ST 151
358-482-13 $82.85 1380 NORTHHILL ST 152
358-483-37 $82.85 3525 OLIVE ST 153
358-483-38 $82.85 3519 OLIVE ST 154
358-483-39 $82.85 3513 OLIVE ST 155
358-483-40 $82.85 3507 OLIVE ST 156
358-483-41 $82.85 3501 OLIVE ST 157
358-483-42 $82.85 3502 OLIVE ST 158
358-483-43 $82.85 3508 OLIVE ST 159
358-483-44 $82.85 3514 OLIVE ST 160
358-483-45 $82.85 3520 OLIVE ST 161
358-483-46 $82.85 3526 OLIVE ST 162
358-482-14 $82.85 1374 NORTHHILL ST 163
358-482-15 $82.85 1368 NORTHHILL ST 164
358-483-47 $82.85 3523 DOCKERY AVE 165
358-483-48 $82.85 3521 DOCKERY AVE 166
358-483-49 $82.85 3515 DOCKERY AVE 167
358-483-50 $82.85 3513 DOCKERY AVE 168
358-483-51 $82.85 3511 DOCKERY AVE 169
358-483-52 $82.85 1350 NELSON BLVD 170
358-541-01 $82.85 1357 NELSON BLVD 171
358-541-02 $82.85 3487 DOCKERY AVE 172
358-541-03 $82.85 3475 DOCKERY AVE 173
358-541-04 $82.85 3463 DOCKERY AVE 174
358-541-05 $82.85 3451 DOCKERY AVE 175
358-541-06 $82.85 3439 DOCKERY AVE 176
358-541-07 $82.85 3427 DOCKERY AVE 177
358-541-10 $82.85 3424 DOCKERY AVE 178
358-541-11 $82.85 3436 DOCKERY AVE 179
358-541-12 $82.85 3448 DOCKERY AVE 180
358-541-13 $82.85 3460 DOCKERY AVE 181
358-541-14 $82.85 3472 DOCKERY AVE 182
358-601-04 $82.85 1297 HILLCREST ST 183
358-601-05 $82.85 3502 DOCKERY AVE 184
388
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 1
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-602-01 $82.85 1298 HILLCREST ST 185
358-570-33 $82.85 1328 HICKS ST 186
358-570-34 $82.85 1322 HICKS ST 187
358-570-35 $82.85 1316 HICKS ST 188
358-570-36 $82.85 1310 HICKS ST 189
358-570-37 $82.85 1304 HICKS ST 190
358-570-38 $82.85 1303 HICKS ST 191
358-570-39 $82.85 1309 HICKS ST 192
358-570-40 $82.85 1315 HICKS ST 193
358-570-41 $82.85 1321 HICKS ST 194
358-570-42 $82.85 1327 HICKS ST 195
358-570-43 $82.85 1326 GOLDRIDGE ST 196
358-570-44 $82.85 1320 GOLDRIDGE ST 197
358-570-45 $82.85 1314 GOLDRIDGE ST 198
358-570-46 $82.85 1308 GOLDRIDGE ST 199
358-570-47 $82.85 1302 GOLDRIDGE ST 200
358-570-48 $82.85 1301 GOLDRIDGE ST 201
358-570-49 $82.85 1307 GOLDRIDGE ST 202
358-570-50 $82.85 1313 GOLDRIDGE ST 203
358-570-51 $82.85 1319 GOLDRIDGE ST 204
358-570-52 $82.85 1325 GOLDRIDGE ST 205
358-570-53 $82.85 1331 GOLDRIDGE ST 206
358-570-54 $82.85 1337 GOLDRIDGE ST 207
358-570-55 $82.85 3701 OLIVE ST 208
358-570-56 $82.85 3707 OLIVE ST 209
358-570-57 $82.85 3713 OLIVE ST 210
358-570-58 $82.85 3719 OLIVE ST 211
358-570-59 $82.85 3725 OLIVE ST 212
358-570-60 $82.85 3731 OLIVE ST 213
358-580-34 $82.85 3737 OLIVE ST 214
358-580-35 $82.85 3743 OLIVE ST 215
358-580-36 $82.85 3803 OLIVE ST 216
358-580-37 $82.85 3809 OLIVE ST 217
358-580-38 $82.85 3815 OLIVE ST 218
358-580-39 $82.85 3821 OLIVE ST 219
358-580-40 $82.85 3827 OLIVE ST 220
358-580-41 $82.85 3833 OLIVE ST 221
358-580-42 $82.85 3834 OLIVE ST 222
358-580-43 $82.85 3828 OLIVE ST 223
358-580-44 $82.85 3822 OLIVE ST 224
358-580-45 $82.85 3816 OLIVE ST 225
358-580-46 $82.85 3810 OLIVE ST 226
358-580-47 $82.85 3804 OLIVE ST 227
358-580-48 $82.85 3744 OLIVE ST 228
358-580-49 $82.85 3738 OLIVE ST 229
358-580-50 $82.85 3732 OLIVE ST 230
389
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 1
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-580-51 $82.85 3733 DOCKERY AVE 231
358-580-52 $82.85 3737 DOCKERY AVE 232
358-580-53 $82.85 3741 DOCKERY AVE 233
358-580-54 $82.85 3745 DOCKERY AVE 234
358-580-55 $82.85 3749 DOCKERY AVE 235
358-580-56 $82.85 3753 DOCKERY AVE 236
358-580-57 $82.85 3757 DOCKERY AVE 237
358-580-58 $82.85 3817 DOCKERY AVE 238
358-580-59 $82.85 3821 DOCKERY AVE 239
358-580-60 $82.85 3825 DOCKERY AVE 240
358-580-61 $82.85 3829 DOCKERY AVE 241
358-580-62 $82.85 3831 DOCKERY AVE 242
358-580-63 $82.85 3835 DOCKERY AVE 243
358-580-64 $82.85 3839 DOCKERY AVE 244
358-650-01 $82.85 1260 STEPHANIE ST 245
358-650-02 $82.85 1254 STEPHANIE ST 246
358-650-03 $82.85 1248 STEPHANIE ST 247
358-650-04 $82.85 1242 STEPHANIE ST 248
358-650-05 $82.85 1236 STEPHANIE ST 249
358-650-06 $82.85 1230 STEPHANIE ST 250
358-650-07 $82.85 1224 STEPHANIE ST 251
358-650-08 $82.85 1218 STEPHANIE ST 252
358-650-09 $82.85 1212 STEPHANIE ST 253
358-650-10 $82.85 1206 STEPHANIE ST 254
358-650-11 $82.85 1122 STEPHANIE ST 255
358-650-12 $82.85 1116 STEPHANIE ST 256
358-650-13 $82.85 1110 STEPHANIE ST 257
358-650-14 $82.85 1104 STEPHANIE ST 258
358-650-15 $82.85 1042 STEPHANIE ST 259
358-650-16 $82.85 1036 STEPHANIE ST 260
358-650-17 $82.85 1030 STEPHANIE ST 261
358-650-18 $82.85 1255 STEPHANIE ST 262
358-650-19 $82.85 1249 STEPHANIE ST 263
358-650-20 $82.85 1243 STEPHANIE ST 264
358-650-21 $82.85 1237 STEPHANIE ST 265
358-650-22 $82.85 1231 STEPHANIE ST 266
358-650-23 $82.85 1225 STEPHANIE ST 267
358-650-24 $82.85 1219 STEPHANIE ST 268
358-650-25 $82.85 1213 STEPHANIE ST 269
358-650-26 $82.85 1207 STEPHANIE ST 270
358-650-27 $82.85 1208 TAMMY ST 271
358-650-28 $82.85 1214 TAMMY ST 272
358-650-29 $82.85 1220 TAMMY ST 273
358-650-30 $82.85 1226 TAMMY ST 274
358-650-31 $82.85 1232 TAMMY ST 275
358-650-32 $82.85 1238 TAMMY ST 276
390
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 1
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-650-33 $82.85 1244 TAMMY ST 277
358-650-34 $82.85 1250 TAMMY ST 278
358-650-35 $82.85 1256 TAMMY ST 279
358-650-36 $82.85 1253 TAMMY ST 280
358-650-37 $82.85 1247 TAMMY ST 281
358-650-38 $82.85 1241 TAMMY ST 282
358-650-39 $82.85 1235 TAMMY ST 283
358-650-40 $82.85 1229 TAMMY ST 284
358-650-41 $82.85 1223 TAMMY ST 285
358-650-42 $82.85 1217 TAMMY ST 286
358-650-43 $82.85 3719 HILL ST 287
358-650-44 $82.85 3716 HILL ST 288
358-650-45 $82.85 3722 HILL ST 289
358-650-46 $82.85 3804 HILL ST 290
358-650-47 $82.85 3810 HILL ST 291
358-650-48 $82.85 3816 HILL ST 292
358-650-49 $82.85 3822 HILL ST 293
358-650-50 $82.85 3819 VIA CORVINO ST 294
358-650-51 $82.85 3813 VIA CORVINO ST 295
358-650-52 $82.85 3807 VIA CORVINO ST 296
358-650-53 $82.85 3801 VIA CORVINO ST 297
358-650-54 $82.85 3723 VIA CORVINO ST 298
358-650-55 $82.85 3717 VIA CORVINO ST 299
358-650-56 $82.85 3718 VIA CORVINO ST 300
358-650-57 $82.85 3802 VIA CORVINO ST 301
358-650-58 $82.85 3806 VIA CORVINO ST 302
358-650-59 $82.85 3812 VIA CORVINO ST 303
358-660-01 $82.85 1016 HICKS ST 304
358-660-02 $82.85 1022 HICKS ST 305
358-660-03 $82.85 3712 VIA CORVINO ST 306
358-660-04 $82.85 1019 HICKS ST 307
358-660-05 $82.85 1025 HICKS ST 308
358-660-06 $82.85 1031 HICKS ST 309
358-660-07 $82.85 3705 VIA CORVINO ST 310
358-660-08 $82.85 3711 VIA CORVINO ST 311
358-660-09 $82.85 3710 HILL ST 312
358-660-10 $82.85 3704 HILL ST 313
358-660-11 $82.85 3707 HILL ST 314
358-660-12 $82.85 3713 HILL ST 315
358-660-13 $82.85 1246 HICKS ST 316
358-660-14 $82.85 1240 HICKS ST 317
358-660-15 $82.85 1234 HICKS ST 318
358-660-16 $82.85 1228 HICKS ST 319
358-660-17 $82.85 1222 HICKS ST 320
358-660-18 $82.85 1216 HICKS ST 321
358-660-19 $82.85 1215 HICKS ST 322
391
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 1
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-660-20 $82.85 1221 HICKS ST 323
358-660-21 $82.85 1227 HICKS ST 324
358-660-22 $82.85 1233 HICKS ST 325
358-660-23 $82.85 1239 HICKS ST 326
358-660-24 $82.85 1245 HICKS ST 327
358-660-25 $82.85 1248 GOLDRIDGE ST 328
358-660-26 $82.85 1242 GOLDRIDGE ST 329
358-660-27 $82.85 1236 GOLDRIDGE ST 330
358-660-28 $82.85 1230 GOLDRIDGE ST 331
358-660-29 $82.85 1224 GOLDRIDGE ST 332
358-660-30 $82.85 1218 GOLDRIDGE ST 333
358-660-31 $82.85 3610 HILL ST 334
358-660-32 $82.85 3604 HILL ST 335
358-660-33 $82.85 1124 GOLDRIDGE ST 336
358-660-34 $82.85 1118 GOLDRIDGE ST 337
358-660-35 $82.85 1112 GOLDRIDGE ST 338
358-660-36 $82.85 1106 GOLDRIDGE ST 339
358-660-37 $82.85 1225 GOLDRIDGE ST 340
358-660-38 $82.85 1231 GOLDRIDGE ST 341
358-660-39 $82.85 1237 GOLDRIDGE ST 342
358-660-40 $82.85 1243 GOLDRIDGE ST 343
358-660-41 $82.85 1249 GOLDRIDGE ST 344
358-660-42 $82.85 1255 GOLDRIDGE ST 345
358-670-01 $82.85 1024 STEPHANIE ST 346
358-670-02 $82.85 1018 STEPHANIE ST 347
358-670-03 $82.85 1012 STEPHANIE ST 348
358-670-04 $82.85 1006 STEPHANIE ST 349
358-670-05 $82.85 1002 STEPHANIE ST 350
358-670-06 $82.85 1003 STEPHANIE ST 351
358-670-07 $82.85 3814 BELLA VISTA 352
358-670-08 $82.85 3808 BELLA VISTA 353
358-670-09 $82.85 3802 BELLA VISTA 354
358-670-10 $82.85 1011 TAMMY ST 355
358-670-11 $82.85 1017 TAMMY ST 356
358-670-12 $82.85 1023 TAMMY ST 357
358-670-13 $82.85 3807 BELLA VISTA 358
358-670-14 $82.85 3813 BELLA VISTA 359
358-602-18 $82.85 1251 NORTHHILL ST 360
358-602-19 $82.85 1245 NORTHHILL ST 361
358-602-20 $82.85 1239 NORTHHILL ST 362
358-602-21 $82.85 1233 NORTHHILL ST 363
358-602-22 $82.85 1227 NORTHHILL ST 364
358-602-23 $82.85 1221 NORTHHILL ST 365
358-602-24 $82.85 1215 NORTHHILL ST 366
358-602-25 $82.85 3538 HILL ST 367
358-602-26 $82.85 3544 HILL ST 368
392
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 1
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-602-27 $82.85 3550 HILL ST 369
358-602-28 $82.85 1123 GOLDRIDGE ST 370
358-602-29 $82.85 1117 GOLDRIDGE ST 371
358-602-30 $82.85 1111 GOLDRIDGE ST 372
358-603-01 $82.85 1252 NORTHHILL ST 373
358-603-02 $82.85 1246 NORTHHILL ST 374
358-603-03 $82.85 1240 NORTHHILL ST 375
358-603-04 $82.85 1234 NORTHHILL ST 376
358-603-05 $82.85 1228 NORTHHILL ST 377
358-603-06 $82.85 1222 NORTHHILL ST 378
ZONE 1 Total $31,317.30 Total parcels 378
393
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 2
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
348-300-01 $81.44 3748 N CHANDLER CT 1
348-300-02 $81.44 3742 N CHANDLER CT 2
348-300-03 $81.44 3736 N CHANDLER CT 3
348-300-04 $81.44 3730 N CHANDLER CT 4
348-300-05 $81.44 3724 N CHANDLER CT 5
348-300-06 $81.44 3627 N CHANDLER CT 6
348-300-07 $81.44 3633 N CHANDLER CT 7
348-300-08 $81.44 3721 N CHANDLER CT 8
348-300-09 $81.44 3727 N CHANDLER CT 9
348-310-01 $81.44 3621 N CHANDLER CT 10
348-310-02 $81.44 3615 N CHANDLER CT 11
348-310-03 $81.44 3609 N CHANDLER CT 12
348-310-04 $81.44 3603 N CHANDLER CT 13
348-310-05 $81.44 3602 N CHANDLER CT 14
348-310-06 $81.44 3608 N CHANDLER CT 15
348-310-07 $81.44 3614 N CHANDLER CT 16
348-310-08 $81.44 3620 N CHANDLER CT 17
348-310-09 $81.44 3714 BALBOA ST 18
348-310-10 $81.44 3720 BALBOA ST 19
348-310-11 $81.44 3726 BALBOA ST 20
348-310-12 $81.44 3723 CLAY CT 21
348-310-13 $81.44 3724 CLAY CT 22
348-310-14 $81.44 3721 COLUMBIA ST 23
348-310-15 $81.44 3715 COLUMBIA ST 24
348-310-16 $81.44 3707 COLUMBIA ST 25
348-310-17 $81.44 3703 COLUMBIA ST 26
348-310-18 $81.44 3631 COLUMBIA ST 27
348-310-19 $81.44 3625 COLUMBIA ST 28
348-310-20 $81.44 3619 COLUMBIA ST 29
348-310-21 $81.44 3107 NORTHHILL ST 30
348-310-22 $81.44 3023 NORTHHILL ST 31
348-310-23 $81.44 3017 NORTHHILL ST 32
348-310-24 $81.44 3011 NORTHHILL ST 33
348-310-25 $81.44 3005 NORTHHILL ST 34
348-310-26 $81.44 3004 NORTHHILL ST 35
348-310-27 $81.44 3010 NORTHHILL ST 36
348-310-28 $81.44 3016 NORTHHILL ST 37
348-310-29 $81.44 3630 COLUMBIA ST 38
348-310-30 $81.44 3704 COLUMBIA ST 39
348-310-31 $81.44 3710 COLUMBIA ST 40
348-310-32 $81.44 3716 COLUMBIA ST 41
348-310-33 $81.44 3722 COLUMBIA ST 42
348-310-34 $81.44 3100 GOLDRIDGE ST 43
348-310-35 $81.44 3106 GOLDRIDGE ST 44
348-310-36 $81.44 3112 GOLDRIDGE ST 45
348-310-37 $81.44 3118 GOLDRIDGE ST 46
394
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 2
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
348-310-38 $81.44 3124 GOLDRIDGE ST 47
348-310-39 $81.44 3130 GOLDRIDGE ST 48
348-310-40 $81.44 3202 GOLDRIDGE ST 49
348-310-41 $81.44 3208 GOLDRIDGE ST 50
348-310-42 $81.44 3214 GOLDRIDGE ST 51
348-310-43 $81.44 3220 GOLDRIDGE ST 52
348-310-44 $81.44 3226 GOLDRIDGE ST 53
348-310-45 $81.44 3737 GOLDRIDGE ST 54
348-310-46 $81.44 3731 BALBOA ST 55
348-310-47 $81.44 3725 BALBOA ST 56
348-310-48 $81.44 3718 N CHANDLER CT 57
348-310-61 $81.44 3112 NORTHHILL ST 58
348-310-62 $81.44 3118 NORTHHILL ST 59
348-310-63 $81.44 3124 NORTHHILL ST 60
348-310-64 $81.44 3718 CLAY CT 61
348-310-65 $81.44 3712 CLAY CT 62
348-310-66 $81.44 3706 CLAY CT 63
348-310-67 $81.44 3618 CLAY CT 64
348-310-68 $81.44 3612 CLAY CT 65
348-310-69 $81.44 3606 CLAY CT 66
348-310-70 $81.44 3605 CLAY CT 67
348-310-71 $81.44 3611 CLAY CT 68
348-310-72 $81.44 3617 CLAY CT 69
348-310-73 $81.44 3623 CLAY CT 70
348-310-74 $81.44 3705 CLAY CT 71
348-310-75 $81.44 3711 CLAY CT 72
348-310-76 $81.44 3717 CLAY CT 73
348-320-01 $81.44 3113 NORTHHILL ST 74
348-320-02 $81.44 3119 NORTHHILL ST 75
348-320-03 $81.44 3125 NORTHHILL ST 76
348-320-04 $81.44 3514 S CHANDLER CT 77
348-320-05 $81.44 3508 S CHANDLER CT 78
348-320-06 $81.44 3502 S CHANDLER CT 79
348-320-07 $81.44 3489 COLUMBIA ST 80
348-320-08 $81.44 3507 COLUMBIA ST 81
348-320-09 $81.44 3513 COLUMBIA ST 82
348-320-10 $81.44 3519 COLUMBIA ST 83
348-320-11 $81.44 3520 COLUMBIA ST 84
348-320-12 $81.44 3514 COLUMBIA ST 85
348-320-13 $81.44 3508 COLUMBIA ST 86
348-320-14 $81.44 3502 COLUMBIA ST 87
348-320-15 $81.44 3490 COLUMBIA ST 88
348-320-16 $81.44 3484 COLUMBIA ST 89
348-320-17 $81.44 3105 KENT ST 90
348-320-18 $81.44 3111 KENT ST 91
348-320-19 $81.44 3117 KENT ST 92
395
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 2
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
348-320-20 $81.44 3123 KENT ST 93
348-320-21 $81.44 3485 S CHANDLER CT 94
348-320-22 $81.44 3491 S CHANDLER CT 95
348-320-23 $81.44 3503 S CHANDLER CT 96
348-320-24 $81.44 3509 S CHANDLER CT 97
348-320-25 $81.44 3515 S CHANDLER CT 98
348-320-26 $81.44 3521 S CHANDLER CT 99
348-320-27 $81.44 3527 S CHANDLER CT 100
348-320-28 $81.44 3533 S CHANDLER CT 101
348-320-29 $81.44 3538 S CHANDLER CT 102
348-320-30 $81.44 3532 S CHANDLER CT 103
348-320-31 $81.44 3526 S CHANDLER CT 104
348-320-32 $81.44 3520 S CHANDLER CT 105
358-333-22 $81.44 2366 AZALEA ST 106
358-333-23 $81.44 2360 AZALEA ST 107
358-333-24 $81.44 2354 AZALEA ST 108
358-333-25 $81.44 2348 AZALEA ST 109
358-333-26 $81.44 2342 AZALEA ST 110
358-333-27 $81.44 2336 AZALEA ST 111
358-333-28 $81.44 2330 AZALEA ST 112
358-333-29 $81.44 2324 AZALEA ST 113
358-333-30 $81.44 2318 AZALEA ST 114
358-333-31 $81.44 2312 AZALEA ST 115
358-333-32 $81.44 2306 AZALEA ST 116
358-333-33 $81.44 2300 AZALEA ST 117
358-333-34 $81.44 2307 AZALEA ST 118
358-333-35 $81.44 2313 AZALEA ST 119
358-333-36 $81.44 2319 AZALEA ST 120
358-333-37 $81.44 2325 AZALEA ST 121
358-333-38 $81.44 2331 AZALEA ST 122
358-333-39 $81.44 2337 AZALEA ST 123
358-333-40 $81.44 2343 AZALEA ST 124
358-336-01 $81.44 2349 AZALEA ST 125
358-336-02 $81.44 2355 AZALEA ST 126
358-336-03 $81.44 2361 AZALEA ST 127
358-336-04 $81.44 2367 AZALEA ST 128
358-336-05 $81.44 2403 AZALEA ST 129
358-336-06 $81.44 2409 AZALEA ST 130
358-336-07 $81.44 2415 AZALEA ST 131
358-336-08 $81.44 2421 AZALEA ST 132
358-336-09 $81.44 2427 AZALEA ST 133
358-336-10 $81.44 2433 AZALEA ST 134
358-336-11 $81.44 2439 AZALEA ST 135
358-336-12 $81.44 2438 AZALEA ST 136
358-336-13 $81.44 2432 AZALEA ST 137
358-336-14 $81.44 2426 AZALEA ST 138
396
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 2
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-336-15 $81.44 2420 AZALEA ST 139
358-336-16 $81.44 2414 AZALEA ST 140
358-336-17 $81.44 2408 AZALEA ST 141
358-336-18 $81.44 2402 AZALEA ST 142
358-471-01S $81.44 2707 NELSON BLVD 143
358-471-02S $81.44 2701 NELSON BLVD 144
358-471-03S $81.44 3453 MITCHELL AVE 145
358-471-04S $81.44 3449 MITCHELL AVE 146
358-471-05S $81.44 3445 MITCHELL AVE 147
358-471-06S $81.44 3441 MITCHELL AVE 148
358-471-07S $81.44 3437 MITCHELL AVE 149
358-471-08S $81.44 3433 MITCHELL AVE 150
358-471-09S $81.44 3429 MITCHELL AVE 151
358-471-10S $81.44 3425 MITCHELL AVE 152
358-471-11S $81.44 3421 MITCHELL AVE 153
358-471-12S $81.44 3417 MITCHELL AVE 154
358-471-13S $81.44 3413 MITCHELL AVE 155
358-471-14S $81.44 3409 MITCHELL AVE 156
358-471-15S $81.44 3405 MITCHELL AVE 157
358-471-16S $81.44 3401 MITCHELL AVE 158
358-472-01S $81.44 2611 NELSON BLVD 159
358-472-02S $81.44 2615 NELSON BLVD 160
358-472-03S $81.44 3458 MITCHELL AVE 161
358-472-04S $81.44 3452 MITCHELL AVE 162
358-472-05S $81.44 3448 MITCHELL AVE 163
358-472-06S $81.44 3444 MITCHELL AVE 164
358-472-07S $81.44 3440 MITCHELL AVE 165
358-472-08S $81.44 3436 MITCHELL AVE 166
358-472-09S $81.44 3432 MITCHELL AVE 167
358-472-10S $81.44 3428 MITCHELL AVE 168
358-472-11S $81.44 3424 MITCHELL AVE 169
358-472-12S $81.44 3420 MITCHELL AVE 170
358-472-13S $81.44 3416 MITCHELL AVE 171
358-472-14S $81.44 2616 HUNTSMAN AVE 172
358-472-15S $81.44 2612 HUNTSMAN AVE 173
358-472-16S $81.44 2608 HUNTSMAN AVE 174
358-472-17S $81.44 2602 HUNTSMAN AVE 175
358-472-18S $81.44 3415 SNYDER ST 176
358-472-19S $81.44 3419 SNYDER ST 177
358-472-20S $81.44 3423 SNYDER ST 178
358-472-21S $81.44 3427 SNYDER ST 179
358-472-22S $81.44 3431 SNYDER ST 180
358-472-23S $81.44 3435 SNYDER ST 181
358-472-24S $81.44 3439 SNYDER ST 182
358-472-25S $81.44 3443 SNYDER ST 183
358-472-26S $81.44 3447 SNYDER ST 184
397
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 2
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-472-27S $81.44 3451 SNYDER ST 185
358-472-28S $81.44 3455 SNYDER ST 186
358-472-29S $81.44 2607 NELSON BLVD 187
358-472-30S $81.44 2601 NELSON BLVD 188
358-473-02S $81.44 3447 THOMPSON AVE 189
358-473-03S $81.44 3441 THOMPSON AVE 190
358-473-08S $81.44 2565 NELSON BLVD 191
358-473-09S $81.44 2569 NELSON BLVD 192
358-473-10S $81.44 2573 NELSON BLVD 193
358-473-11S $81.44 2577 NELSON BLVD 194
358-473-12S $81.44 2581 NELSON BLVD 195
358-473-13S $81.44 3458 SNYDER ST 196
358-473-14S $81.44 3446 SNYDER ST 197
358-473-15S $81.44 3438 SNYDER ST 198
358-473-16S $81.44 3430 SNYDER ST 199
358-473-17S $81.44 3420 SNYDER ST 200
358-473-18S $81.44 3414 SNYDER ST 201
358-473-19S $81.44 2582 HUNTSMAN AVE 202
358-473-20S $81.44 2578 HUNTSMAN AVE 203
358-473-21S $81.44 2574 HUNTSMAN AVE 204
358-473-22S $81.44 2570 HUNTSMAN AVE 205
358-473-23S $81.44 2566 HUNTSMAN AVE 206
358-473-24S $81.44 3459 THOMPSON AVE 207
358-473-25S $81.44 3453 THOMPSON AVE 208
358-473-27S $81.44 2509 NELSON BLVD 209
358-473-28S $81.44 3452 KELLY CIR 210
358-473-29S $81.44 3448 KELLY CIR 211
358-473-30S $81.44 3444 KELLY CIR 212
358-473-31S $81.44 3440 KELLY CIR 213
358-473-32S $81.44 2543 NELSON BLVD 214
358-490-01S $81.44 2711 NELSON BLVD 215
358-490-02S $81.44 2715 NELSON BLVD 216
358-490-03S $81.44 2719 NELSON BLVD 217
358-490-04S $81.44 2723 NELSON BLVD 218
358-490-05S $81.44 2727 NELSON BLVD 219
358-490-06S $81.44 2731 NELSON BLVD 220
358-490-08S $81.44 2755 NELSON BLVD 221
358-490-09S $81.44 2729 PHEASANT RUN ST 222
358-490-10S $81.44 2725 PHEASANT RUN ST 223
358-490-11S $81.44 2721 PHEASANT RUN ST 224
358-490-12S $81.44 2717 PHEASANT RUN ST 225
358-490-13S $81.44 3402 ORYAN ST 226
358-490-14S $81.44 3406 ORYAN ST 227
358-490-15S $81.44 3410 ORYAN ST 228
358-490-16S $81.44 3414 ORYAN ST 229
358-490-17S $81.44 3418 ORYAN ST 230
398
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 2
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-490-18S $81.44 3422 ORYAN ST 231
358-490-19S $81.44 3426 ORYAN ST 232
358-490-20S $81.44 3430 ORYAN ST 233
358-490-21S $81.44 3434 ORYAN ST 234
358-490-22S $81.44 3438 ORYAN ST 235
358-490-23S $81.44 3442 ORYAN ST 236
358-490-24S $81.44 2714 BURNHAM ST 237
358-490-25S $81.44 2718 BURNHAM ST 238
358-490-28S $81.44 2719 BURNHAM ST 239
358-490-29S $81.44 2720 PHEASANT RUN ST 240
358-490-30S $81.44 3415 ORYAN ST 241
358-490-31S $81.44 3419 ORYAN ST 242
358-490-32S $81.44 3423 ORYAN ST 243
358-490-35S $81.44 2726 BURNHAM ST 244
358-490-37S $81.44 2722 BURNHAM ST 245
358-490-38 $81.44 3497 SHAFT ST 246
358-490-39 $81.44 3489 SHAFT ST 247
358-490-40 $81.44 3477 SHAFT ST 248
358-490-41 $81.44 3465 SHAFT ST 249
358-490-42 $81.44 3453 SHAFT ST 250
358-490-43 $81.44 3441 SHAFT ST 251
358-490-44 $81.44 3433 SHAFT ST 252
358-490-45 $81.44 3421 SHAFT ST 253
358-490-46 $81.44 2925 HUNTSMAN AVE 254
358-490-47 $81.44 2913 HUNTSMAN AVE 255
358-490-48 $81.44 2901 HUNTSMAN AVE 256
358-490-49 $81.44 2885 HUNTSMAN AVE 257
358-490-50 $81.44 2873 HUNTSMAN AVE 258
358-490-51 $81.44 2861 HUNTSMAN AVE 259
358-490-52 $81.44 3412 JORDAN ST 260
358-490-53 $81.44 3424 JORDAN ST 261
358-490-54 $81.44 3436 JORDAN ST 262
358-490-55 $81.44 3448 JORDAN ST 263
358-490-56 $81.44 3460 JORDAN ST 264
358-490-57 $81.44 3472 JORDAN ST 265
358-490-58 $81.44 3484 JORDAN ST 266
358-490-59 $81.44 3496 JORDAN ST 267
358-490-60 $81.44 3495 JORDAN ST 268
358-490-61 $81.44 3487 JORDAN ST 269
358-490-62 $81.44 3475 JORDAN ST 270
358-490-63 $81.44 3463 JORDAN ST 271
358-490-64 $81.44 3451 JORDAN ST 272
358-490-65 $81.44 3439 JORDAN ST 273
358-490-66 $81.44 3427 JORDAN ST 274
358-490-67 $81.44 3426 SHAFT ST 275
358-490-68 $81.44 3438 SHAFT ST 276
399
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 2
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-490-69 $81.44 3450 SHAFT ST 277
358-490-70 $81.44 3462 SHAFT ST 278
358-490-71 $81.44 3474 SHAFT ST 279
358-490-72 $81.44 3486 SHAFT ST 280
358-490-73 $81.44 3498 SHAFT ST 281
358-490-75S $81.44 3427 ORYAN ST 282
358-490-76S $81.44 3431 ORYAN ST 283
358-511-01 $81.44 3518 CLEVELAND ST 284
358-511-02 $81.44 3524 CLEVELAND ST 285
358-511-03 $81.44 3536 CLEVELAND ST 286
358-511-04 $81.44 3548 CLEVELAND ST 287
358-511-05 $81.44 3602 CLEVELAND ST 288
358-511-06 $81.44 3608 CLEVELAND ST 289
358-511-07 $81.44 3616 CLEVELAND ST 290
358-511-08 $81.44 3624 CLEVELAND ST 291
358-511-09 $81.44 2832 NORTHHILL ST 292
358-511-10 $81.44 2836 NORTHHILL ST 293
358-511-11 $81.44 2840 NORTHHILL ST 294
358-511-12 $81.44 2844 NORTHHILL ST 295
358-511-13 $81.44 2848 NORTHHILL ST 296
358-511-14 $81.44 2852 NORTHHILL ST 297
358-511-15 $81.44 2856 NORTHHILL ST 298
358-511-16 $81.44 2860 NORTHHILL ST 299
358-511-17 $81.44 2964 NORTHHILL ST 300
358-511-18 $81.44 2968 NORTHHILL ST 301
358-511-19 $81.44 2972 NORTHHILL ST 302
358-511-20 $81.44 2976 NORTHHILL ST 303
358-511-21 $81.44 2971 NORTHHILL ST 304
358-511-22 $81.44 2969 NORTHHILL ST 305
358-511-23 $81.44 3607 SHAFT ST 306
358-511-24 $81.44 3547 SHAFT ST 307
358-511-25 $81.44 3535 SHAFT ST 308
358-511-26 $81.44 3531 SHAFT ST 309
358-511-27 $81.44 3527 SHAFT ST 310
358-511-28 $81.44 2974 NELSON BLVD 311
358-511-31S $81.44 2714 NORTHHILL ST 312
358-511-32S $81.44 2720 NORTHHILL ST 313
358-511-33S $81.44 2726 NORTHHILL ST 314
358-511-34S $81.44 2732 NORTHHILL ST 315
358-511-35S $81.44 2738 NORTHHILL ST 316
358-511-36S $81.44 2737 NORTHHILL ST 317
358-511-37S $81.44 2731 NORTHHILL ST 318
358-511-38S $81.44 2725 NORTHHILL ST 319
358-511-39S $81.44 2719 NORTHHILL ST 320
358-511-40S $81.44 2713 NORTHHILL ST 321
358-511-41S $81.44 2710 HILLCREST ST 322
400
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 2
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-511-42S $81.44 2716 HILLCREST ST 323
358-511-43S $81.44 2722 HILLCREST ST 324
358-511-44S $81.44 2728 HILLCREST ST 325
358-511-45S $81.44 2734 HILLCREST ST 326
358-511-46S $81.44 2735 HILLCREST ST 327
358-511-47S $81.44 2729 HILLCREST ST 328
358-511-48S $81.44 2723 HILLCREST ST 329
358-511-49S $81.44 2717 HILLCREST ST 330
358-511-50S $81.44 2711 HILLCREST ST 331
358-512-01 $81.44 2861 NORTHHILL ST 332
358-512-02 $81.44 2857 NORTHHILL ST 333
358-512-03 $81.44 2853 NORTHHILL ST 334
358-512-04 $81.44 2849 NORTHHILL ST 335
358-512-05 $81.44 2845 NORTHHILL ST 336
358-512-06 $81.44 2841 NORTHHILL ST 337
358-512-07 $81.44 2837 NORTHHILL ST 338
358-512-08 $81.44 2838 HILLCREST ST 339
358-512-09 $81.44 2842 HILLCREST ST 340
358-512-10 $81.44 2846 HILLCREST ST 341
358-512-11 $81.44 2850 HILLCREST ST 342
358-512-12 $81.44 2854 HILLCREST ST 343
358-512-13 $81.44 2858 HILLCREST ST 344
358-512-14 $81.44 2862 HILLCREST ST 345
358-513-01 $81.44 2863 HILLCREST ST 346
358-513-02 $81.44 2859 HILLCREST ST 347
358-513-03 $81.44 2855 HILLCREST ST 348
358-513-04 $81.44 2851 HILLCREST ST 349
358-513-05 $81.44 2847 HILLCREST ST 350
358-513-06 $81.44 2843 HILLCREST ST 351
358-513-07 $81.44 2839 HILLCREST ST 352
358-513-08 $81.44 3523 CLEVELAND ST 353
358-513-09 $81.44 3517 CLEVELAND ST 354
358-513-10 $81.44 2844 NELSON BLVD 355
358-513-11 $81.44 2848 NELSON BLVD 356
358-513-12 $81.44 2852 NELSON BLVD 357
358-513-13 $81.44 2856 NELSON BLVD 358
358-513-14 $81.44 2860 NELSON BLVD 359
358-513-15 $81.44 3530 SHAFT ST 360
358-513-16 $81.44 3526 SHAFT ST 361
358-620-01S $81.44 2504 NORTHHILL ST 362
358-620-02S $81.44 2510 NORTHHILL ST 363
358-620-03S $81.44 2516 NORTHHILL ST 364
358-620-04S $81.44 2522 NORTHHILL ST 365
358-620-05S $81.44 2528 NORTHHILL ST 366
358-620-06S $81.44 2534 NORTHHILL ST 367
358-620-07S $81.44 2540 NORTHHILL ST 368
401
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 2
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-620-08S $81.44 2604 NORTHHILL ST 369
358-620-09S $81.44 2610 NORTHHILL ST 370
358-620-10S $81.44 3651 BRYAN ST 371
358-620-11S $81.44 3645 BRYAN ST 372
358-620-12S $81.44 3644 SNYDER ST 373
358-620-13S $81.44 3650 SNYDER ST 374
358-620-14S $81.44 2646 NORTHHILL ST 375
358-620-15S $81.44 2652 NORTHHILL ST 376
358-620-16S $81.44 2658 NORTHHILL ST 377
358-620-17S $81.44 2708 NORTHHILL ST 378
358-620-18S $81.44 2707 NORTHHILL ST 379
358-620-19S $81.44 2651 NORTHHILL ST 380
358-620-20S $81.44 2645 NORTHHILL ST 381
358-620-21S $81.44 2639 NORTHHILL ST 382
358-620-22S $81.44 2633 NORTHHILL ST 383
358-620-23S $81.44 2627 NORTHHILL ST 384
358-620-24S $81.44 2621 NORTHHILL ST 385
358-620-25S $81.44 2615 NORTHHILL ST 386
358-620-26S $81.44 2609 NORTHHILL ST 387
358-620-27S $81.44 2603 NORTHHILL ST 388
358-620-28S $81.44 2535 NORTHHILL ST 389
358-620-29S $81.44 2529 NORTHHILL ST 390
358-620-30S $81.44 2523 NORTHHILL ST 391
358-620-31S $81.44 2517 NORTHHILL ST 392
358-620-32S $81.44 2511 NORTHHILL ST 393
358-620-33S $81.44 2505 NORTHHILL ST 394
358-620-36S $81.44 2502 HILLCREST ST 395
358-620-37S $81.44 2508 HILLCREST ST 396
358-620-38S $81.44 2514 HILLCREST ST 397
358-620-39S $81.44 2520 HILLCREST ST 398
358-620-40S $81.44 2526 HILLCREST ST 399
358-620-41S $81.44 2532 HILLCREST ST 400
358-620-42S $81.44 2600 HILLCREST ST 401
358-620-43S $81.44 2606 HILLCREST ST 402
358-620-44S $81.44 2612 HILLCREST ST 403
358-620-45S $81.44 2618 HILLCREST ST 404
358-620-46S $81.44 2624 HILLCREST ST 405
358-620-47S $81.44 2630 HILLCREST ST 406
358-620-48S $81.44 2636 HILLCREST ST 407
358-620-49S $81.44 2642 HILLCREST ST 408
358-620-50S $81.44 2648 HILLCREST ST 409
358-620-51S $81.44 2704 HILLCREST ST 410
358-620-52S $81.44 2705 HILLCREST ST 411
358-620-53S $81.44 2649 HILLCREST ST 412
358-620-54S $81.44 2643 HILLCREST ST 413
358-620-55S $81.44 2637 HILLCREST ST 414
402
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 2
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-620-56S $81.44 2631 HILLCREST ST 415
358-620-57S $81.44 2625 HILLCREST ST 416
358-620-58S $81.44 2619 HILLCREST ST 417
358-620-59S $81.44 2613 HILLCREST ST 418
358-620-60S $81.44 2607 HILLCREST ST 419
358-620-61S $81.44 2601 HILLCREST ST 420
358-620-62S $81.44 2539 HILLCREST ST 421
358-620-63S $81.44 2533 HILLCREST ST 422
358-620-64S $81.44 2527 HILLCREST ST 423
358-620-65S $81.44 2521 HILLCREST ST 424
358-620-66S $81.44 2515 HILLCREST ST 425
358-620-67S $81.44 2509 HILLCREST ST 426
358-620-68S $81.44 2503 HILLCREST ST 427
ZONE 2 Total $34,774.88 Total parcels 427
403
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 3
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-431-03 $100.56 3828 THOMPSON AVE 1
358-431-04 $100.56 3822 THOMPSON AVE 2
358-431-05 $100.56 3816 THOMPSON AVE 3
358-431-06 $100.56 3810 THOMPSON AVE 4
358-431-07 $100.56 3804 THOMPSON AVE 5
358-431-08 $100.56 3801 WILLOW ST 6
358-431-09 $100.56 3807 WILLOW ST 7
358-431-10 $100.56 3813 WILLOW ST 8
358-431-11 $100.56 3819 WILLOW ST 9
358-431-12 $100.56 3825 WILLOW ST 10
358-431-13 $100.56 3826 WILLOW ST 11
358-431-14 $100.56 2410 STEPHANIE LN 12
358-431-15 $100.56 2402 STEPHANIE LN 13
358-431-16 $100.56 3827 GAYNOR CIR 14
358-431-17 $100.56 3824 GAYNOR CIR 15
358-431-18 $100.56 2390 STEPHANIE LN 16
358-431-19 $100.56 2384 STEPHANIE LN 17
358-431-20 $100.56 3829 VAN HORN ST 18
358-431-21 $100.56 3828 VAN HORN ST 19
358-431-22 $100.56 3824 VAN HORN ST 20
358-431-23 $100.56 3823 HOWARD ST 21
358-431-24 $100.56 3817 HOWARD ST 22
358-431-25 $100.56 3818 HOWARD ST 23
358-431-26 $100.56 3814 HOWARD ST 24
358-431-27 $100.56 3810 HOWARD ST 25
358-431-28 $100.56 3806 HOWARD ST 26
358-431-29 $100.56 3802 HOWARD ST 27
358-431-32 $100.56 3801 WRIGHT ST 28
358-431-33 $100.56 3805 WRIGHT ST 29
358-431-34 $100.56 3809 WRIGHT ST 30
358-431-35 $100.56 3813 WRIGHT ST 31
358-431-36 $100.56 3817 WRIGHT ST 32
358-433-17 $100.56 3808 WILLOW ST 33
358-433-18 $100.56 2407 STEPHANIE LN 34
358-433-19 $100.56 2401 STEPHANIE LN 35
358-433-20 $100.56 2395 STEPHANIE LN 36
358-433-21 $100.56 2389 STEPHANIE LN 37
358-433-22 $100.56 2385 STEPHANIE LN 38
358-433-23 $100.56 2381 STEPHANIE LN 39
358-433-24 $100.56 2377 STEPHANIE LN 40
358-433-25 $100.56 2373 STEPHANIE LN 41
358-433-26 $100.56 2369 STEPHANIE LN 42
358-501-01 $100.56 2449 SARAH CIR 43
358-501-02 $100.56 2443 SARAH CIR 44
358-501-03 $100.56 2437 SARAH CIR 45
358-501-04 $100.56 2431 SARAH CIR 46
404
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 3
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-501-05 $100.56 2425 SARAH CIR 47
358-501-06 $100.56 2419 SARAH CIR 48
358-501-07 $100.56 2413 SARAH CIR 49
358-501-08 $100.56 2407 SARAH CIR 50
358-501-09 $100.56 2401 SARAH CIR 51
358-501-10 $100.56 2402 SARAH CIR 52
358-501-11 $100.56 2408 SARAH CIR 53
358-501-12 $100.56 2414 SARAH CIR 54
358-501-13 $100.56 2420 SARAH CIR 55
358-501-14 $100.56 2426 SARAH CIR 56
358-501-15 $100.56 2432 SARAH CIR 57
358-501-16 $100.56 2438 SARAH CIR 58
358-501-17 $100.56 2444 SARAH CIR 59
358-501-18 $100.56 2450 SARAH CIR 60
358-501-19 $100.56 2451 NORTHVIEW ST 61
358-501-20 $100.56 2445 NORTHVIEW ST 62
358-501-21 $100.56 2439 NORTHVIEW ST 63
358-501-22 $100.56 2433 NORTHVIEW ST 64
358-501-23 $100.56 2427 NORTHVIEW ST 65
358-501-24 $100.56 2421 NORTHVIEW ST 66
358-501-25 $100.56 2415 NORTHVIEW ST 67
358-501-26 $100.56 2409 NORTHVIEW ST 68
358-501-27 $100.56 2403 NORTHVIEW ST 69
358-501-28 $100.56 2397 NORTHVIEW ST 70
358-501-29 $100.56 2391 NORTHVIEW ST 71
358-501-30 $100.56 2385 NORTHVIEW ST 72
358-501-31 $100.56 2379 NORTHVIEW ST 73
358-501-32 $100.56 2373 NORTHVIEW ST 74
358-501-33 $100.56 2367 NORTHVIEW ST 75
358-501-34 $100.56 2361 NORTHVIEW ST 76
358-501-35 $100.56 2355 NORTHVIEW ST 77
358-501-36 $100.56 2349 NORTHVIEW ST 78
358-502-01 $100.56 2452 NORTHVIEW ST 79
358-502-02 $100.56 2440 NORTHVIEW ST 80
358-502-03 $100.56 3977 WILLOW ST 81
358-502-04 $100.56 3978 S THOMPSON AVE 82
358-503-01 $100.56 2428 NORTHVIEW ST 83
358-503-02 $100.56 2422 NORTHVIEW ST 84
358-503-03 $100.56 2416 NORTHVIEW ST 85
358-503-04 $100.56 2410 NORTHVIEW ST 86
358-503-05 $100.56 2404 NORTHVIEW ST 87
358-503-06 $100.56 2398 NORTHVIEW ST 88
358-503-07 $100.56 2392 NORTHVIEW ST 89
358-503-08 $100.56 2386 NORTHVIEW ST 90
358-503-09 $100.56 2380 NORTHVIEW ST 91
358-503-10 $100.56 2374 NORTHVIEW ST 92
405
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 3
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-503-11 $100.56 2368 NORTHVIEW ST 93
358-503-12 $100.56 2362 NORTHVIEW ST 94
358-503-13 $100.56 2356 NORTHVIEW ST 95
358-503-14 $100.56 2350 NORTHVIEW ST 96
358-503-15 $100.56 2351 SIERRA VIEW ST 97
358-503-16 $100.56 2357 SIERRA VIEW ST 98
358-503-17 $100.56 2363 SIERRA VIEW ST 99
358-503-18 $100.56 2369 SIERRA VIEW ST 100
358-503-19 $100.56 2375 SIERRA VIEW ST 101
358-503-20 $100.56 2381 SIERRA VIEW ST 102
358-503-21 $100.56 2387 SIERRA VIEW ST 103
358-503-22 $100.56 2393 SIERRA VIEW ST 104
358-503-23 $100.56 2399 SIERRA VIEW ST 105
358-503-24 $100.56 2405 SIERRA VIEW ST 106
358-503-25 $100.56 2411 SIERRA VIEW ST 107
358-503-26 $100.56 2417 SIERRA VIEW ST 108
358-503-27 $100.56 2423 SIERRA VIEW ST 109
358-503-28 $100.56 2429 SIERRA VIEW ST 110
358-504-01 $100.56 2436 SIERRA VIEW ST 111
358-504-02 $100.56 2430 SIERRA VIEW ST 112
358-504-03 $100.56 2424 SIERRA VIEW ST 113
358-504-04 $100.56 2418 SIERRA VIEW ST 114
358-504-05 $100.56 2412 SIERRA VIEW ST 115
358-504-06 $100.56 2406 SIERRA VIEW ST 116
358-504-07 $100.56 2400 SIERRA VIEW ST 117
358-504-08 $100.56 2394 SIERRA VIEW ST 118
358-504-09 $100.56 2388 SIERRA VIEW ST 119
358-504-10 $100.56 2382 SIERRA VIEW ST 120
358-504-11 $100.56 2376 SIERRA VIEW ST 121
358-504-12 $100.56 2370 SIERRA VIEW ST 122
358-504-13 $100.56 2364 SIERRA VIEW ST 123
358-504-14 $100.56 2358 SIERRA VIEW ST 124
358-504-15 $100.56 2352 SIERRA VIEW ST 125
358-551-01 $100.56 2566 SIERRA VIEW ST 126
358-551-02 $100.56 2560 SIERRA VIEW ST 127
358-551-03 $100.56 2554 SIERRA VIEW ST 128
358-551-04 $100.56 2548 SIERRA VIEW ST 129
358-551-05 $100.56 2652 SIERRA VIEW ST 130
358-551-06 $100.56 2646 SIERRA VIEW ST 131
358-551-07 $100.56 2640 SIERRA VIEW ST 132
358-551-08 $100.56 2634 SIERRA VIEW ST 133
358-551-09 $100.56 2628 SIERRA VIEW ST 134
358-551-10 $100.56 2622 SIERRA VIEW ST 135
358-551-11 $100.56 2616 SIERRA VIEW ST 136
358-551-12 $100.56 2610 SIERRA VIEW ST 137
358-551-13 $100.56 2606 SIERRA VIEW ST 138
406
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 3
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-552-01 $100.56 2565 SIERRA VIEW ST 139
358-552-02 $100.56 2559 SIERRA VIEW ST 140
358-552-03 $100.56 2553 SIERRA VIEW ST 141
358-552-04 $100.56 3935 JASPER ST 142
358-552-05 $100.56 3929 JASPER ST 143
358-552-06 $100.56 2552 SARAH ST 144
358-552-07 $100.56 2558 SARAH ST 145
358-552-08 $100.56 2564 SARAH ST 146
358-552-09 $100.56 3930 SNYDER ST 147
358-552-10 $100.56 3936 SNYDER ST 148
358-552-11 $100.56 2639 SIERRA VIEW ST 149
358-552-12 $100.56 2633 SIERRA VIEW ST 150
358-552-13 $100.56 2627 SIERRA VIEW ST 151
358-552-14 $100.56 2621 SIERRA VIEW ST 152
358-552-15 $100.56 2615 SIERRA VIEW ST 153
358-552-16 $100.56 2609 SIERRA VIEW ST 154
358-552-17 $100.56 2605 SIERRA VIEW ST 155
358-552-18 $100.56 2638 SARAH ST 156
358-552-19 $100.56 2632 SARAH ST 157
358-552-20 $100.56 2626 SARAH ST 158
358-552-21 $100.56 2620 SARAH ST 159
358-552-22 $100.56 2614 SARAH ST 160
358-552-23 $100.56 2608 SARAH ST 161
358-553-01 $100.56 3925 SNYDER ST 162
358-553-02 $100.56 3919 SNYDER ST 163
358-553-03 $100.56 3913 SNYDER ST 164
358-553-04 $100.56 3907 SNYDER ST 165
358-553-05 $100.56 3908 MITCHELL AVE 166
358-553-06 $100.56 3914 MITCHELL AVE 167
358-553-07 $100.56 3920 MITCHELL AVE 168
358-553-08 $100.56 3926 MITCHELL AVE 169
358-553-09 $100.56 2631 SARAH ST 170
358-553-10 $100.56 2625 SARAH ST 171
358-553-11 $100.56 2619 SARAH ST 172
358-554-01 $100.56 2563 SARAH ST 173
358-554-02 $100.56 2557 SARAH ST 174
358-554-03 $100.56 2551 SARAH ST 175
358-554-04 $100.56 2545 SARAH ST 176
358-554-05 $100.56 2539 SARAH ST 177
358-554-06 $100.56 2533 SARAH ST 178
358-554-07 $100.56 2517 SARAH ST 179
358-554-08 $100.56 2511 SARAH ST 180
358-554-09 $100.56 2505 SARAH ST 181
358-555-01 $100.56 3920 KELLY CIR 182
358-555-02 $100.56 3926 KELLY CIR 183
358-555-03 $100.56 3932 KELLY CIR 184
407
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 3
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-555-04 $100.56 3938 KELLY CIR 185
358-555-05 $100.56 3939 KELLY CIR 186
358-555-06 $100.56 3933 KELLY CIR 187
358-555-07 $100.56 3927 KELLY CIR 188
358-555-08 $100.56 3921 KELLY CIR 189
358-555-09 $100.56 3922 JASPER ST 190
358-555-10 $100.56 3928 JASPER ST 191
358-555-11 $100.56 3934 JASPER ST 192
358-555-12 $100.56 3940 JASPER ST 193
358-556-01 $100.56 3909 MITCHELL AVE 194
358-556-02 $100.56 3915 MITCHELL AVE 195
358-556-03 $100.56 3921 MITCHELL AVE 196
358-556-04 $100.56 3927 MITCHELL AVE 197
358-556-05 $100.56 3933 MITCHELL AVE 198
358-556-06 $100.56 3939 MITCHELL AVE 199
358-556-07 $100.56 3945 MITCHELL AVE 200
358-556-08 $100.56 3951 MITCHELL AVE 201
ZONE 3 Total: $20,212.56 Total Parcels: 201
408
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 4
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-521-11 $108.46 2121 ALTON ST 1
358-521-12 $108.46 2115 ALTON ST 2
358-521-13 $108.46 2105 ALTON ST 3
358-521-14 $108.46 2053 ALTON ST 4
358-521-15 $108.46 2045 ALTON ST 5
358-521-16 $108.46 2037 ALTON ST 6
358-521-17 $108.46 2029 ALTON ST 7
358-521-18 $108.46 2021 ALTON ST 8
358-521-19 $108.46 2015 ALTON ST 9
358-521-20 $108.46 2003 ALTON ST 10
358-521-21 $108.46 2004 MAPLE ST 11
358-521-22 $108.46 2008 MAPLE ST 12
358-521-23 $108.46 2016 MAPLE ST 13
358-521-24 $108.46 2024 MAPLE ST 14
358-521-25 $108.46 2030 MAPLE ST 15
358-521-26 $108.46 2040 MAPLE ST 16
358-521-27 $108.46 2048 MAPLE ST 17
358-521-28 $108.46 2102 MAPLE ST 18
358-521-29 $108.46 2108 MAPLE ST 19
358-521-30 $108.46 2116 MAPLE ST 20
358-521-32 $108.46 2129 ALTON ST 21
358-521-33 $108.46 2137 ALTON ST 22
358-521-34 $108.46 2145 ALTON ST 23
358-521-35 $108.46 2207 ALTON ST 24
358-521-36 $108.46 2217 ALTON ST 25
358-521-37 $108.46 2223 ALTON ST 26
358-521-38 $108.46 2251 ALTON ST 27
358-521-39 $108.46 2259 ALTON ST 28
358-521-40 $108.46 2260 MAPLE ST 29
358-521-41 $108.46 2252 MAPLE ST 30
358-521-42 $108.46 2224 MAPLE ST 31
358-521-43 $108.46 2218 MAPLE ST 32
358-521-44 $108.46 2208 MAPLE ST 33
358-521-45 $108.46 2146 MAPLE ST 34
358-521-46 $108.46 2138 MAPLE ST 35
358-521-47 $108.46 2124 MAPLE ST 36
358-522-01 $108.46 2003 OAK ST 37
358-522-02 $108.46 2011 OAK ST 38
358-522-03 $108.46 2019 OAK ST 39
358-522-04 $108.46 2027 OAK ST 40
358-522-05 $108.46 2035 OAK ST 41
358-522-06 $108.46 2043 OAK ST 42
358-522-07 $108.46 2051 OAK ST 43
358-522-08 $108.46 2103 OAK ST 44
358-522-09 $108.46 2111 OAK ST 45
358-522-10 $108.46 2104 ALTON ST 46
409
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 4
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-522-11 $108.46 2058 ALTON ST 47
358-522-12 $108.46 2044 ALTON ST 48
358-522-13 $108.46 2036 ALTON ST 49
358-522-14 $108.46 2028 ALTON ST 50
358-523-01 $108.46 2127 OAK ST 51
358-523-02 $108.46 2135 OAK ST 52
358-523-03 $108.46 2143 OAK ST 53
358-523-04 $108.46 2205 OAK ST 54
358-523-05 $108.46 2215 OAK ST 55
358-523-06 $108.46 2221 OAK ST 56
358-523-07 $108.46 2239 OAK ST 57
358-523-08 $108.46 2257 OAK ST 58
358-523-09 $108.46 2258 ALTON ST 59
358-523-10 $108.46 2250 ALTON ST 60
358-523-11 $108.46 2222 ALTON ST 61
358-523-12 $108.46 2216 ALTON ST 62
358-523-13 $108.46 2206 ALTON ST 63
358-523-14 $108.46 2144 ALTON ST 64
358-523-15 $108.46 2136 ALTON ST 65
358-523-16 $108.46 2128 ALTON ST 66
358-524-01 $108.46 2116 OAK ST 67
358-524-02 $108.46 2108 OAK ST 68
358-524-03 $108.46 2102 OAK ST 69
358-524-04 $108.46 2048 OAK ST 70
358-524-05 $108.46 2040 OAK ST 71
358-524-06 $108.46 2030 OAK ST 72
358-524-07 $108.46 2024 OAK ST 73
358-524-08 $108.46 2016 OAK ST 74
358-524-09 $108.46 2008 OAK ST 75
358-524-10 $108.46 2004 OAK ST 76
358-524-11 $108.46 2256 OAK ST 77
358-524-12 $108.46 2238 OAK ST 78
358-524-13 $108.46 2220 OAK ST 79
358-524-14 $108.46 2214 OAK ST 80
358-524-15 $108.46 2204 OAK ST 81
358-524-16 $108.46 2142 OAK ST 82
358-524-17 $108.46 2134 OAK ST 83
358-524-18 $108.46 2126 OAK ST 84
358-531-01 $108.46 1914 ALTON CT 85
358-531-02 $108.46 1908 ALTON CT 86
358-531-03 $108.46 1902 ALTON CT 87
358-531-04 $108.46 1822 OAK ST 88
358-531-05 $108.46 1816 OAK ST 89
358-531-06 $108.46 1810 OAK ST 90
358-531-07 $108.46 1804 OAK ST 91
358-531-08 $108.46 1718 OAK ST 92
410
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 4
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-531-09 $108.46 1712 OAK ST 93
358-531-10 $108.46 1706 OAK ST 94
358-531-11 $108.46 1707 ASPEN ST 95
358-531-12 $108.46 1713 ASPEN ST 96
358-531-13 $108.46 1719 ASPEN ST 97
358-531-14 $108.46 1805 ASPEN ST 98
358-531-15 $108.46 1811 ASPEN ST 99
358-531-16 $108.46 1817 ASPEN ST 100
358-531-17 $108.46 1823 ASPEN ST 101
358-532-01 $108.46 1913 ALTON CT 102
358-532-02 $108.46 1907 ALTON CT 103
358-532-03 $108.46 1901 ALTON CT 104
358-533-01 $108.46 1815 OAK ST 105
358-533-02 $108.46 1809 OAK ST 106
358-533-03 $108.46 1803 OAK ST 107
358-533-04 $108.46 1717 OAK ST 108
358-533-05 $108.46 1711 OAK ST 109
358-533-06 $108.46 1705 OAK ST 110
358-533-07 $108.46 1704 ALTON ST 111
358-533-08 $108.46 1710 ALTON ST 112
358-533-09 $108.46 1716 ALTON ST 113
358-533-10 $108.46 1802 ALTON ST 114
358-533-11 $108.46 1808 ALTON ST 115
358-533-12 $108.46 1814 ALTON ST 116
358-534-01 $108.46 3068 JOY ST 117
358-534-02 $108.46 3062 JOY ST 118
358-534-03 $108.46 3056 JOY ST 119
358-534-04 $108.46 3050 JOY ST 120
358-534-05 $108.46 3044 JOY ST 121
358-534-06 $108.46 3038 JOY ST 122
358-534-07 $108.46 3032 JOY ST 123
358-534-08 $108.46 3026 JOY ST 124
358-534-09 $108.46 3025 LOVE ST 125
358-534-10 $108.46 3031 LOVE ST 126
358-534-11 $108.46 3037 LOVE ST 127
358-534-12 $108.46 3043 LOVE ST 128
358-534-13 $108.46 3049 LOVE ST 129
358-534-14 $108.46 3055 LOVE ST 130
358-534-15 $108.46 3061 LOVE ST 131
358-534-16 $108.46 1624 ASPEN ST 132
358-534-17 $108.46 1618 ASPEN ST 133
358-534-18 $108.46 1612 ASPEN ST 134
358-534-19 $108.46 1606 ASPEN ST 135
358-535-01 $108.46 3048 LOVE ST 136
358-535-02 $108.46 3042 LOVE ST 137
358-535-03 $108.46 3036 LOVE ST 138
411
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 4
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-535-04 $108.46 3030 LOVE ST 139
358-535-05 $108.46 3024 LOVE ST 140
358-535-06 $108.46 3047 D ST 141
358-535-07 $108.46 3041 D ST 142
358-535-08 $108.46 3035 D ST 143
358-535-09 $108.46 3029 D ST 144
358-535-10 $108.46 3018 D ST 145
358-535-11 $108.46 3012 D ST 146
358-535-12 $108.46 3008 D ST 147
358-535-13 $108.46 3002 D ST 148
358-561-01 $108.46 1708 ASPEN ST 149
358-561-02 $108.46 1714 ASPEN ST 150
358-561-03 $108.46 1720 ASPEN ST 151
358-561-04 $108.46 1806 ASPEN ST 152
358-561-05 $108.46 1812 ASPEN ST 153
358-561-06 $108.46 1818 ASPEN ST 154
358-561-07 $108.46 1819 COOPER ST 155
358-561-08 $108.46 1813 COOPER ST 156
358-561-09 $108.46 1807 COOPER ST 157
358-561-10 $108.46 1721 COOPER ST 158
358-561-11 $108.46 1715 COOPER ST 159
358-561-12 $108.46 1709 COOPER ST 160
358-561-13 $108.46 1631 COOPER ST 161
358-561-14 $108.46 1625 COOPER ST 162
358-561-15 $108.46 1619 COOPER ST 163
358-561-16 $108.46 1613 COOPER ST 164
358-561-17 $108.46 1607 COOPER ST 165
358-561-18 $108.46 1601 COOPER ST 166
358-561-19 $108.46 3134 LOVE ST 167
358-561-20 $108.46 3140 LOVE ST 168
358-561-21 $108.46 3148 LOVE ST 169
358-561-22 $108.46 3156 LOVE ST 170
358-561-23 $108.46 3164 LOVE ST 171
358-561-24 $108.46 3172 LOVE ST 172
358-562-01 $108.46 1925 BARBARA ST 173
358-562-02 $108.46 1919 BARBARA ST 174
358-562-03 $108.46 1913 BARBARA ST 175
358-562-04 $108.46 1907 BARBARA ST 176
358-562-05 $108.46 1833 BARBARA ST 177
358-562-06 $108.46 1827 BARBARA ST 178
358-562-07 $108.46 1821 BARBARA ST 179
358-562-08 $108.46 1815 BARBARA ST 180
358-562-09 $108.46 1809 BARBARA ST 181
358-562-10 $108.46 1729 BARBARA ST 182
358-562-11 $108.46 1723 BARBARA ST 183
358-562-12 $108.46 1717 BARBARA ST 184
412
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 4
2025/2026
APN Assessment Situs Address #
358-562-13 $108.46 1711 BARBARA ST 185
358-562-14 $108.46 1705 BARBARA ST 186
358-562-15 $108.46 1621 BARBARA ST 187
358-562-16 $108.46 1615 BARBARA ST 188
358-562-18 $108.46 3165 LOVE ST 189
358-562-19 $108.46 3157 LOVE ST 190
358-562-20 $108.46 3149 LOVE ST 191
358-562-21 $108.46 3141 LOVE ST 192
358-562-22 $108.46 3142 JOY CT 193
358-562-23 $108.46 3150 JOY CT 194
358-562-24 $108.46 3158 JOY CT 195
358-562-25 $108.46 3159 JOY CT 196
358-562-26 $108.46 3151 JOY CT 197
358-562-27 $108.46 1716 COOPER ST 198
358-562-28 $108.46 1722 COOPER ST 199
358-562-29 $108.46 1808 COOPER ST 200
358-562-30 $108.46 1814 COOPER ST 201
358-562-31 $108.46 1820 COOPER ST 202
358-562-32 $108.46 1826 COOPER ST 203
358-562-33 $108.46 1832 COOPER ST 204
358-562-34 $108.46 1912 COOPER ST 205
358-562-35 $108.46 1918 COOPER ST 206
358-562-36 $108.46 1924 COOPER ST 207
358-562-37 $108.46 1923 COOPER ST 208
358-562-38 $108.46 1917 COOPER ST 209
358-562-39 $108.46 1911 COOPER ST 210
358-562-40 $108.46 1905 COOPER ST 211
358-562-41 $108.46 1904 ASPEN ST 212
358-562-42 $108.46 1910 ASPEN ST 213
ZONE 4 Total: $23,101.98 Total Parcels: 213
413
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 5
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
389-331-01 $137.29 2003 OLIVE ST 1
389-331-02 $137.29 2007 OLIVE ST 2
389-331-03 $137.29 2011 OLIVE ST 3
389-331-04 $137.29 2015 OLIVE ST 4
389-331-05 $137.29 2019 OLIVE ST 5
389-331-06 $137.29 2023 OLIVE ST 6
389-331-07 $137.29 2027 OLIVE ST 7
389-331-08 $137.29 2031 OLIVE ST 8
389-331-09 $137.29 1348 WALNUT ST 9
389-331-10 $137.29 1344 WALNUT ST 10
389-331-11 $137.29 1340 WALNUT ST 11
389-331-12 $137.29 1336 WALNUT ST 12
389-331-13 $137.29 1332 WALNUT ST 13
389-331-14 $137.29 1328 WALNUT ST 14
389-331-15 $137.29 1324 WALNUT ST 15
389-331-16 $137.29 1320 WALNUT ST 16
389-331-17 $137.29 1316 WALNUT ST 17
389-331-18 $137.29 1312 WALNUT ST 18
389-331-19 $137.29 1308 WALNUT ST 19
389-332-01 $137.29 2026 ORCHARD ST 20
389-332-02 $137.29 2022 ORCHARD ST 21
389-332-03 $137.29 2018 ORCHARD ST 22
389-332-04 $137.29 2014 ORCHARD ST 23
389-332-05 $137.29 1309 PLUM ST 24
389-332-06 $137.29 1313 PLUM ST 25
389-332-07 $137.29 1317 PLUM ST 26
389-332-08 $137.29 1321 PLUM ST 27
389-332-09 $137.29 1325 PLUM ST 28
389-332-10 $137.29 1329 PLUM ST 29
389-332-11 $137.29 1333 PLUM ST 30
389-332-12 $137.29 1337 PLUM ST 31
389-332-13 $137.29 1341 PLUM ST 32
389-333-01 $137.29 1342 PLUM ST 33
389-333-02 $137.29 1338 PLUM ST 34
389-333-03 $137.29 1334 PLUM ST 35
389-333-04 $137.29 1330 PLUM ST 36
389-333-05 $137.29 1326 PLUM ST 37
389-333-06 $137.29 1322 PLUM ST 38
389-333-07 $137.29 1318 PLUM ST 39
389-333-08 $137.29 1319 WALNUT ST 40
389-333-09 $137.29 1323 WALNUT ST 41
389-333-10 $137.29 1327 WALNUT ST 42
389-333-11 $137.29 1331 WALNUT ST 43
389-333-12 $137.29 1335 WALNUT ST 44
389-333-13 $137.29 1339 WALNUT ST 45
389-333-14 $137.29 1343 WALNUT ST 46
414
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 5
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
389-350-01 $137.29 2439 RODEO ST 47
389-350-02 $137.29 2505 RODEO ST 48
389-350-03 $137.29 2511 RODEO ST 49
389-350-04 $137.29 2517 RODEO ST 50
389-350-05 $137.29 2523 RODEO ST 51
389-350-08 $137.29 1015 PRAIRIE ST 52
389-350-09 $137.29 1009 PRAIRIE ST 53
389-350-10 $137.29 1003 PRAIRIE ST 54
389-350-11 $137.29 2516 CHAPARAL ST 55
389-350-12 $137.29 2510 CHAPARAL ST 56
389-350-13 $137.29 2504 CHAPARAL ST 57
389-350-14 $137.29 2438 CHAPARAL ST 58
389-350-15 $137.29 2432 CHAPARAL ST 59
389-350-16 $137.29 2435 CHAPARAL ST 60
389-350-17 $137.29 2441 CHAPARAL ST 61
389-350-18 $137.29 2503 CHAPARAL ST 62
389-350-19 $137.29 2509 CHAPARAL ST 63
389-350-20 $137.29 2515 CHAPARAL ST 64
389-350-21 $137.29 2518 RODEO ST 65
389-350-22 $137.29 2512 RODEO ST 66
389-350-23 $137.29 2506 RODEO ST 67
389-350-24 $137.29 2442 RODEO ST 68
389-350-25 $137.29 2436 RODEO ST 69
389-350-27 $137.29 1021 PRAIRIE ST 70
389-350-28 $137.29 2529 RODEO ST 71
389-360-01 $137.29 1001 COUNTRY ROSE ST 72
389-360-02 $137.29 1007 COUNTRY ROSE ST 73
389-360-05 $137.29 2415 RODEO ST 74
389-360-06 $137.29 2421 RODEO ST 75
389-360-07 $137.29 2427 RODEO ST 76
389-360-08 $137.29 2433 RODEO ST 77
389-360-09 $137.29 2428 RODEO ST 78
389-360-10 $137.29 2422 RODEO ST 79
389-360-11 $137.29 2416 RODEO ST 80
389-360-12 $137.29 1010 COUNTRY ROSE ST 81
389-360-13 $137.29 2423 CHAPARAL ST 82
389-360-14 $137.29 2429 CHAPARAL ST 83
389-360-15 $137.29 2426 CHAPARAL ST 84
389-360-16 $137.29 2420 CHAPARAL ST 85
389-360-17 $137.29 2414 CHAPARAL ST 86
389-360-21 $137.29 1044 ROSE AVE 87
389-360-22 $137.29 2403 RODEO ST 88
ZONE 5 Total: $12,081.52 Total Parcels: 88
415
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 6
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
358-570-01 $81.42 3607 MULBERRY ST 1
358-570-02 $81.42 3613 MULBERRY ST 2
358-570-03 $81.42 3705 MULBERRY ST 3
358-570-04 $81.42 3711 MULBERRY ST 4
358-570-05 $81.42 3717 MULBERRY ST 5
358-570-06 $81.42 3723 MULBERRY ST 6
358-570-07 $81.42 3729 MULBERRY ST 7
358-570-08 $81.42 3735 MULBERRY ST 8
358-570-09 $81.42 1460 HICKS ST 9
358-570-10 $81.42 1454 HICKS ST 10
358-570-11 $81.42 1448 HICKS ST 11
358-570-12 $81.42 1442 HICKS ST 12
358-570-13 $81.42 1436 HICKS ST 13
358-570-14 $81.42 1430 HICKS ST 14
358-570-15 $81.42 1429 HICKS ST 15
358-570-16 $81.42 1435 HICKS ST 16
358-570-17 $81.42 1441 HICKS ST 17
358-570-18 $81.42 1447 HICKS ST 18
358-570-19 $81.42 1453 HICKS ST 19
358-570-20 $81.42 1459 HICKS ST 20
358-570-21 $81.42 1458 GOLDRIDGE ST 21
358-570-22 $81.42 1452 GOLDRIDGE ST 22
358-570-23 $81.42 1446 GOLDRIDGE ST 23
358-570-24 $81.42 1440 GOLDRIDGE ST 24
358-570-25 $81.42 1434 GOLDRIDGE ST 25
358-570-26 $81.42 1428 GOLDRIDGE ST 26
358-570-27 $81.42 1427 GOLDRIDGE ST 27
358-570-28 $81.42 1433 GOLDRIDGE ST 28
358-570-29 $81.42 1439 GOLDRIDGE ST 29
358-570-30 $81.42 1445 GOLDRIDGE ST 30
358-570-31 $81.42 1451 GOLDRIDGE ST 31
358-570-32 $81.42 1457 GOLDRIDGE ST 32
358-580-01 $81.42 3741 MULBERRY ST 33
358-580-02 $81.42 3803 MULBERRY ST 34
358-580-03 $81.42 1468 TAMMY LN 35
358-580-04 $81.42 1462 TAMMY LN 36
358-580-05 $81.42 1456 TAMMY LN 37
358-580-06 $81.42 1450 TAMMY LN 38
358-580-07 $81.42 1444 TAMMY LN 39
358-580-08 $81.42 1445 STEPHANIE LN 40
358-580-09 $81.42 1451 STEPHANIE LN 41
358-580-10 $81.42 1457 STEPHANIE LN 42
358-580-11 $81.42 1463 STEPHANIE LN 43
358-580-12 $81.42 1469 STEPHANIE LN 44
358-580-13 $81.42 1475 STEPHANIE LN 45
358-580-14 $81.42 1476 STEPHANIE LN 46
416
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 6
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
358-580-15 $81.42 1470 STEPHANIE LN 47
358-580-16 $81.42 1464 STEPHANIE LN 48
358-580-17 $81.42 1458 STEPHANIE LN 49
358-580-18 $81.42 1452 STEPHANIE LN 50
358-580-19 $81.42 1446 STEPHANIE LN 51
358-580-20 $81.42 3840 GARFIELD ST 52
358-580-21 $81.42 3834 GARFIELD ST 53
358-580-22 $81.42 3828 GARFIELD ST 54
358-580-23 $81.42 3822 GARFIELD ST 55
358-580-24 $81.42 3816 GARFIELD ST 56
358-580-25 $81.42 3810 GARFIELD ST 57
358-580-26 $81.42 1431 TAMMY LN 58
358-580-27 $81.42 1437 TAMMY LN 59
358-580-28 $81.42 1443 TAMMY LN 60
358-580-29 $81.42 1449 TAMMY LN 61
358-580-30 $81.42 1455 TAMMY LN 62
358-580-31 $81.42 1461 TAMMY LN 63
ZONE 6 Total: $5,129.46 Total Parcels: 63
417
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 7
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
358-290-29S $68.37 2650 STEPHANIE ST 1
358-290-30S $68.37 2644 STEPHANIE ST 2
358-290-31S $68.37 2638 STEPHANIE ST 3
358-290-32S $68.37 2632 STEPHANIE ST 4
358-290-33S $68.37 3850 SNYDER ST 5
358-290-34S $68.37 3844 SNYDER ST 6
358-290-35S $68.37 3838 SNYDER ST 7
358-290-36S $68.37 3832 SNYDER ST 8
358-290-37S $68.37 3826 SNYDER ST 9
358-290-38S $68.37 3820 SNYDER ST 10
358-290-39S $68.37 3814 SNYDER ST 11
358-290-40S $68.37 3808 SNYDER ST 12
358-290-41S $68.37 2629 TAMMY ST 13
358-290-42S $68.37 2635 TAMMY ST 14
358-290-43S $68.37 2641 TAMMY ST 15
358-290-44S $68.37 2647 TAMMY ST 16
358-290-45S $68.37 2653 TAMMY ST 17
358-290-46S $68.37 2659 TAMMY ST 18
358-290-47S $68.37 2665 TAMMY ST 19
358-290-48S $68.37 2671 TAMMY ST 20
358-290-49S $68.37 2683 TAMMY ST 21
358-290-50S $68.37 2678 TAMMY ST 22
358-290-51S $68.37 2672 TAMMY ST 23
358-290-52S $68.37 2666 TAMMY ST 24
358-290-53S $68.37 2660 TAMMY ST 25
358-290-54S $68.37 2654 TAMMY ST 26
358-290-55S $68.37 2648 TAMMY ST 27
358-290-56S $68.37 2642 TAMMY ST 28
358-290-57S $68.37 2636 TAMMY ST 29
358-290-58S $68.37 2637 STEPHANIE ST 30
358-290-59S $68.37 2643 STEPHANIE ST 31
358-290-60S $68.37 2649 STEPHANIE ST 32
358-290-61S $68.37 2655 STEPHANIE ST 33
358-290-62S $68.37 2661 STEPHANIE ST 34
358-290-63S $68.37 2667 STEPHANIE ST 35
358-290-64S $68.37 2675 STEPHANIE ST 36
358-290-65S $68.37 2674 STEPHANIE ST 37
358-290-66S $68.37 2668 STEPHANIE ST 38
358-290-67S $68.37 2662 STEPHANIE ST 39
358-591-01S $68.37 3735 BRYAN ST 40
358-591-02S $68.37 3741 BRYAN ST 41
358-591-03S $68.37 2620 HICKS ST 42
358-591-04S $68.37 2614 HICKS ST 43
358-591-05S $68.37 2608 HICKS ST 44
358-591-06S $68.37 2552 HICKS ST 45
358-591-07S $68.37 2546 HICKS ST 46
418
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 7
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
358-591-08S $68.37 2540 HICKS ST 47
358-591-09S $68.37 3736 SNYDER ST 48
358-591-10S $68.37 3742 SNYDER ST 49
358-591-11S $68.37 2654 HICKS ST 50
358-591-12S $68.37 2662 HICKS ST 51
358-591-13S $68.37 2670 HICKS ST 52
358-592-01S $68.37 2528 HICKS ST 53
358-592-02S $68.37 2522 HICKS ST 54
358-592-03S $68.37 2516 HICKS ST 55
358-592-04S $68.37 2510 HICKS ST 56
358-593-01S $68.37 2613 HICKS ST 57
358-593-02S $68.37 2607 HICKS ST 58
358-593-03S $68.37 2551 HICKS ST 59
358-593-04S $68.37 2545 HICKS ST 60
358-593-05S $68.37 2539 HICKS ST 61
358-593-06S $68.37 2533 HICKS ST 62
358-593-07S $68.37 2527 HICKS ST 63
358-593-08S $68.37 2521 HICKS ST 64
358-593-09S $68.37 2515 HICKS ST 65
358-593-10S $68.37 2509 HICKS ST 66
358-593-12 $68.37 2508 GOLDRIDGE ST 67
358-593-13 $68.37 2514 GOLDRIDGE ST 68
358-593-14 $68.37 2520 GOLDRIDGE ST 69
358-593-15 $68.37 2526 GOLDRIDGE ST 70
358-593-16S $68.37 2532 GOLDRIDGE ST 71
358-593-17S $68.37 2538 GOLDRIDGE ST 72
358-593-18S $68.37 2544 GOLDRIDGE ST 73
358-593-19S $68.37 2550 GOLDRIDGE ST 74
358-593-20S $68.37 2606 GOLDRIDGE ST 75
358-593-21S $68.37 2612 GOLDRIDGE ST 76
358-594-01S $68.37 3723 BRYAN ST 77
358-594-02S $68.37 3717 BRYAN ST 78
358-594-03S $68.37 3711 BRYAN ST 79
358-594-04S $68.37 3705 BRYAN ST 80
358-594-05S $68.37 3724 SNYDER ST 81
358-594-06S $68.37 3718 SNYDER ST 82
358-594-07S $68.37 3712 SNYDER ST 83
358-594-08S $68.37 3706 SNYDER ST 84
358-595-01S $68.37 3704 BRYAN ST 85
358-595-02S $68.37 3710 BRYAN ST 86
358-595-03S $68.37 3716 BRYAN ST 87
358-595-04S $68.37 3715 JASPER ST 88
358-595-05S $68.37 3709 JASPER ST 89
358-595-06S $68.37 3703 JASPER ST 90
358-595-07S $68.37 3702 JASPER ST 91
358-595-08S $68.37 3708 JASPER ST 92
419
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 7
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
358-595-09S $68.37 3714 JASPER ST 93
358-595-10S $68.37 2525 GOLDRIDGE ST 94
358-595-11 $68.37 2519 GOLDRIDGE ST 95
358-595-12 $68.37 2513 GOLDRIDGE ST 96
358-595-13 $68.37 2507 GOLDRIDGE ST 97
358-596-01S $68.37 2682 HICKS ST 98
358-597-01S $68.37 2689 HICKS ST 99
358-597-02S $68.37 2681 HICKS ST 100
358-597-03S $68.37 2673 HICKS ST 101
358-597-04S $68.37 2665 HICKS ST 102
358-597-05S $68.37 2662 GOLDRIDGE ST 103
358-597-06S $68.37 2670 GOLDRIDGE ST 104
358-597-07S $68.37 2678 GOLDRIDGE ST 105
358-597-08S $68.37 2686 GOLDRIDGE ST 106
358-598-01S $68.37 3702 SHERRI ST 107
358-598-02S $68.37 3708 SHERRI ST 108
358-598-03S $68.37 3714 SHERRI ST 109
358-598-04S $68.37 3715 SNYDER ST 110
358-598-05S $68.37 3709 SNYDER ST 111
358-598-06S $68.37 3703 SNYDER ST 112
358-611-01S $68.37 3713 CLEVELAND ST 113
358-611-02S $68.37 3719 CLEVELAND ST 114
358-611-03S $68.37 3725 CLEVELAND ST 115
358-611-04S $68.37 3731 CLEVELAND ST 116
358-611-05S $68.37 3737 CLEVELAND ST 117
358-611-06S $68.37 3743 CLEVELAND ST 118
358-611-07S $68.37 3749 CLEVELAND ST 119
358-612-01S $68.37 2748 HICKS ST 120
358-612-02S $68.37 2740 HICKS ST 121
358-612-03S $68.37 2732 HICKS ST 122
358-612-04S $68.37 2724 HICKS ST 123
358-612-05S $68.37 2716 HICKS ST 124
358-612-06S $68.37 2708 HICKS ST 125
358-612-07S $68.37 2700 HICKS ST 126
358-612-08S $68.37 2690 HICKS ST 127
358-613-01S $68.37 2697 HICKS ST 128
358-613-02S $68.37 2705 HICKS ST 129
358-613-03S $68.37 2713 HICKS ST 130
358-613-04S $68.37 2721 HICKS ST 131
358-613-05S $68.37 2729 HICKS ST 132
358-613-06S $68.37 2731 HICKS ST 133
358-613-07S $68.37 2745 HICKS ST 134
358-613-08S $68.37 2753 HICKS ST 135
358-613-09S $68.37 2754 GOLDRIDGE ST 136
358-613-10S $68.37 2746 GOLDRIDGE ST 137
358-613-11S $68.37 2738 GOLDRIDGE ST 138
420
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 7
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
358-613-12S $68.37 2730 GOLDRIDGE ST 139
358-613-13S $68.37 2722 GOLDRIDGE ST 140
358-613-14S $68.37 2714 GOLDRIDGE ST 141
358-613-15S $68.37 2706 GOLDRIDGE ST 142
358-613-16S $68.37 2694 GOLDRIDGE ST 143
358-614-01S $68.37 3703 SHERRI ST 144
358-614-02S $68.37 3709 SHERRI ST 145
358-614-03S $68.37 3715 SHERRI ST 146
358-614-04S $68.37 3716 JACEY ST 147
358-614-05S $68.37 3710 JACEY ST 148
358-614-06S $68.37 3704 JACEY ST 149
358-614-07S $68.37 3705 JACEY ST 150
358-614-08S $68.37 3711 JACEY ST 151
358-614-09S $68.37 3717 JACEY ST 152
358-614-10S $68.37 3714 CLEVELAND ST 153
358-614-11S $68.37 3708 CLEVELAND ST 154
358-614-12S $68.37 2761 GOLDRIDGE ST 155
358-614-13S $68.37 2767 GOLDRIDGE ST 156
358-614-14S $68.37 2777 GOLDRIDGE ST 157
358-640-01S $68.37 2680 STEPHANIE ST 158
358-640-02S $68.37 2686 STEPHANIE ST 159
358-640-03S $68.37 3851 PRIMROSE ST 160
358-640-04S $68.37 3845 PRIMROSE ST 161
358-640-05S $68.37 3839 PRIMROSE ST 162
358-640-06S $68.37 3833 PRIMROSE ST 163
358-640-07S $68.37 3827 PRIMROSE ST 164
358-640-08S $68.37 3821 PRIMROSE ST 165
358-640-09S $68.37 3815 PRIMROSE ST 166
358-640-10S $68.37 3809 PRIMROSE ST 167
358-640-11S $68.37 2707 TAMMY ST 168
358-640-12S $68.37 2701 TAMMY ST 169
358-640-13S $68.37 2691 TAMMY ST 170
358-640-14S $68.37 2684 TAMMY ST 171
358-640-15S $68.37 2681 STEPHANIE ST 172
ZONE 7 Total: $11,759.64 Total Parcels: 172
421
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 8
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
388-301-01 $128.82 2349 CLEVELAND ST 1
388-301-02 $128.82 2343 CLEVELAND ST 2
388-301-03 $128.82 2337 CLEVELAND ST 3
388-301-04 $128.82 2331 CLEVELAND ST 4
388-301-05 $128.82 2325 CLEVELAND ST 5
388-301-06 $128.82 2319 CLEVELAND ST 6
388-301-07 $128.82 2313 CLEVELAND ST 7
388-301-08 $128.82 2757 EVERGREEN ST 8
388-301-09 $128.82 2751 EVERGREEN ST 9
388-301-10 $128.82 2745 EVERGREEN ST 10
388-301-11 $128.82 2739 EVERGREEN ST 11
388-301-12 $128.82 2742 MILL ST 12
388-301-13 $128.82 2748 MILL ST 13
388-301-14 $128.82 2754 MILL ST 14
388-301-15 $128.82 2760 MILL ST 15
388-301-16 $128.82 2766 MILL ST 16
388-301-18 $128.82 2351 SHAFT ST 17
388-301-19 $128.82 2345 SHAFT ST 18
388-301-20 $128.82 2339 SHAFT ST 19
388-301-21 $128.82 2333 SHAFT ST 20
388-301-22 $128.82 2327 SHAFT ST 21
388-301-23 $128.82 2321 SHAFT ST 22
388-301-24 $128.82 2805 EVERGREEN ST 23
388-301-25 $128.82 2811 EVERGREEN ST 24
388-301-26 $128.82 2817 EVERGREEN ST 25
388-301-27 $128.82 2823 EVERGREEN ST 26
388-301-28 $128.82 2829 EVERGREEN ST 27
388-301-29 $128.82 2822 MILL ST 28
388-301-30 $128.82 2816 MILL ST 29
388-301-31 $128.82 2810 MILL ST 30
388-301-32 $128.82 2804 MILL ST 31
388-301-33 $128.82 2778 MILL ST 32
388-301-34 $128.82 2772 MILL ST 33
388-302-01 $128.82 2252 BERRY ST 34
388-302-02 $128.82 2302 BERRY ST 35
388-302-03 $128.82 2308 BERRY ST 36
388-302-04 $128.82 2307 MITCHELL AVE 37
388-302-05 $128.82 2301 MITCHELL AVE 38
388-302-06 $128.82 2251 MITCHELL AVE 39
388-303-01 $128.82 2347 MITCHELL AVE 40
388-303-02 $128.82 2341 MITCHELL AVE 41
388-303-03 $128.82 2335 MITCHELL AVE 42
388-303-04 $128.82 2329 MITCHELL AVE 43
388-303-05 $128.82 2726 EVERGREEN ST 44
388-303-06 $128.82 2732 EVERGREEN ST 45
388-303-07 $128.82 2738 EVERGREEN ST 46
422
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 8
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
388-303-08 $128.82 2744 EVERGREEN ST 47
388-303-09 $128.82 2750 EVERGREEN ST 48
388-303-10 $128.82 2756 EVERGREEN ST 49
388-303-11 $128.82 2762 EVERGREEN ST 50
388-303-12 $128.82 2759 PINE ST 51
388-303-13 $128.82 2753 PINE ST 52
388-303-14 $128.82 2747 PINE ST 53
388-303-15 $128.82 2741 PINE ST 54
388-303-16 $128.82 2735 PINE ST 55
388-303-17 $128.82 2734 PINE ST 56
388-303-18 $128.82 2740 PINE ST 57
388-303-19 $128.82 2746 PINE ST 58
388-303-20 $128.82 2752 PINE ST 59
388-303-21 $128.82 2758 PINE ST 60
388-304-01 $128.82 2808 PINE ST 61
388-304-02 $128.82 2814 PINE ST 62
388-304-03 $128.82 2820 PINE ST 63
388-304-04 $128.82 2826 PINE ST 64
388-304-05 $128.82 2832 PINE ST 65
388-304-06 $128.82 2838 PINE ST 66
388-304-07 $128.82 2837 PINE ST 67
388-304-08 $128.82 2831 PINE ST 68
388-304-09 $128.82 2825 PINE ST 69
388-304-10 $128.82 2819 PINE ST 70
388-304-11 $128.82 2813 PINE ST 71
388-304-12 $128.82 2807 PINE ST 72
388-304-13 $128.82 2806 EVERGREEN ST 73
388-304-14 $128.82 2812 EVERGREEN ST 74
388-304-15 $128.82 2818 EVERGREEN ST 75
388-304-16 $128.82 2824 EVERGREEN ST 76
388-304-17 $128.82 2830 EVERGREEN ST 77
388-304-18 $128.82 2315 SEQUOIA ST 78
388-304-19 $128.82 2309 SEQUOIA ST 79
388-304-20 $128.82 2303 SEQUOIA ST 80
388-304-21 $128.82 2261 SEQUOIA ST 81
388-311-01 $128.82 2204 BERRY ST 82
388-311-02 $128.82 2210 BERRY ST 83
388-311-03 $128.82 2216 BERRY ST 84
388-311-04 $128.82 2222 BERRY ST 85
388-311-05 $128.82 2228 BERRY ST 86
388-311-06 $128.82 2234 BERRY ST 87
388-311-07 $128.82 2240 BERRY ST 88
388-311-08 $128.82 2246 BERRY ST 89
388-311-09 $128.82 2245 MITCHELL AVE 90
388-311-10 $128.82 2239 MITCHELL AVE 91
388-311-11 $128.82 2233 MITCHELL AVE 92
423
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 8
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
388-311-12 $128.82 2227 MITCHELL AVE 93
388-311-13 $128.82 2221 MITCHELL AVE 94
388-311-14 $128.82 2215 MITCHELL AVE 95
388-311-15 $128.82 2209 MITCHELL AVE 96
388-311-16 $128.82 2203 MITCHELL AVE 97
388-312-01 $128.82 2767 MILL ST 98
388-312-02 $128.82 2761 MILL ST 99
388-312-03 $128.82 2755 MILL ST 100
388-312-04 $128.82 2749 MILL ST 101
388-312-05 $128.82 2743 MILL ST 102
388-312-06 $128.82 2740 PEACH ST 103
388-312-07 $128.82 2746 PEACH ST 104
388-312-08 $128.82 2752 PEACH ST 105
388-312-09 $128.82 2758 PEACH ST 106
388-312-10 $128.82 2764 PEACH ST 107
388-312-11 $128.82 2765 PEACH ST 108
388-312-12 $128.82 2759 PEACH ST 109
388-312-13 $128.82 2753 PEACH ST 110
388-312-14 $128.82 2747 PEACH ST 111
388-312-15 $128.82 2741 PEACH ST 112
388-312-16 $128.82 2736 FIG ST 113
388-312-17 $128.82 2742 FIG ST 114
388-312-18 $128.82 2748 FIG ST 115
388-312-19 $128.82 2756 FIG ST 116
388-312-20 $128.82 2762 FIG ST 117
388-312-21 $128.82 2768 FIG ST 118
388-312-22 $128.82 2774 FIG ST 119
388-312-23 $128.82 2800 FIG ST 120
388-312-24 $128.82 2806 FIG ST 121
388-312-25 $128.82 2812 FIG ST 122
388-312-26 $128.82 2818 FIG ST 123
388-312-27 $128.82 2831 PEACH ST 124
388-312-28 $128.82 2825 PEACH ST 125
388-312-29 $128.82 2819 PEACH ST 126
388-312-30 $128.82 2813 PEACH ST 127
388-312-31 $128.82 2807 PEACH ST 128
388-312-32 $128.82 2801 PEACH ST 129
388-312-33 $128.82 2802 PEACH ST 130
388-312-34 $128.82 2808 PEACH ST 131
388-312-35 $128.82 2814 PEACH ST 132
388-312-36 $128.82 2820 PEACH ST 133
388-312-37 $128.82 2826 PEACH ST 134
388-312-38 $128.82 2832 PEACH ST 135
388-312-39 $128.82 2821 MILL ST 136
388-312-40 $128.82 2815 MILL ST 137
388-312-41 $128.82 2809 MILL ST 138
424
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 8
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
388-312-42 $128.82 2803 MILL ST 139
388-312-43 $128.82 2779 MILL ST 140
388-312-44 $128.82 2773 MILL ST 141
388-313-01 $128.82 2201 SEQUOIA ST 142
388-313-02 $128.82 2207 SEQUOIA ST 143
388-313-03 $128.82 2213 SEQUOIA ST 144
388-313-04 $128.82 2219 SEQUOIA ST 145
388-313-05 $128.82 2225 SEQUOIA ST 146
388-313-06 $128.82 2231 SEQUOIA ST 147
388-313-07 $128.82 2237 SEQUOIA ST 148
388-313-08 $128.82 2243 SEQUOIA ST 149
388-313-09 $128.82 2249 SEQUOIA ST 150
388-313-10 $128.82 2255 SEQUOIA ST 151
390-201-01S $128.82 2449 VALLEY VIEW ST 152
390-201-02S $128.82 2443 VALLEY VIEW ST 153
390-201-03S $128.82 2437 VALLEY VIEW ST 154
390-201-04S $128.82 2431 VALLEY VIEW ST 155
390-201-05S $128.82 2425 VALLEY VIEW ST 156
390-201-06S $128.82 2419 VALLEY VIEW ST 157
390-201-07S $128.82 2413 VALLEY VIEW ST 158
390-201-08S $128.82 2341 VALLEY VIEW ST 159
390-201-09S $128.82 2335 VALLEY VIEW ST 160
390-201-10S $128.82 2329 VALLEY VIEW ST 161
390-201-11S $128.82 2323 VALLEY VIEW ST 162
390-201-12S $128.82 2317 VALLEY VIEW ST 163
390-201-13S $128.82 2311 VALLEY VIEW ST 164
390-201-14S $128.82 2302 SYCAMORE ST 165
390-201-15S $128.82 2308 SYCAMORE ST 166
390-201-16S $128.82 2314 SYCAMORE ST 167
390-201-17S $128.82 2320 SYCAMORE ST 168
390-201-18S $128.82 2326 SYCAMORE ST 169
390-201-19S $128.82 2330 SYCAMORE ST 170
390-201-20S $128.82 2336 SYCAMORE ST 171
390-201-21S $128.82 2412 SYCAMORE ST 172
390-201-22S $128.82 2418 SYCAMORE ST 173
390-201-23S $128.82 2424 SYCAMORE ST 174
390-201-24S $128.82 2428 SYCAMORE ST 175
390-201-25S $128.82 2434 SYCAMORE ST 176
390-201-26S $128.82 2440 SYCAMORE ST 177
390-201-27S $128.82 2447 SYCAMORE ST 178
390-201-28S $128.82 2441 SYCAMORE ST 179
390-201-29S $128.82 2435 SYCAMORE ST 180
390-201-30S $128.82 2429 SYCAMORE ST 181
390-201-31S $128.82 2423 SYCAMORE ST 182
390-201-32S $128.82 2417 SYCAMORE ST 183
390-201-33S $128.82 2411 SYCAMORE ST 184
425
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 8
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
390-201-34S $128.82 2333 SYCAMORE ST 185
390-201-35S $128.82 2327 SYCAMORE ST 186
390-201-36S $128.82 2321 SYCAMORE ST 187
390-201-37S $128.82 2315 SYCAMORE ST 188
390-201-38S $128.82 2309 SYCAMORE ST 189
390-201-39S $128.82 2237 SYCAMORE ST 190
390-201-40S $128.82 2231 SYCAMORE ST 191
390-201-41S $128.82 2225 SYCAMORE ST 192
390-201-42S $128.82 2219 SYCAMORE ST 193
390-201-43S $128.82 2213 SYCAMORE ST 194
390-201-44S $128.82 2207 SYCAMORE ST 195
390-201-45S $128.82 2204 MAGNOLIA ST 196
390-201-46S $128.82 2210 MAGNOLIA ST 197
390-201-47S $128.82 2216 MAGNOLIA ST 198
390-201-48S $128.82 2222 MAGNOLIA ST 199
390-201-49S $128.82 2228 MAGNOLIA ST 200
390-201-50S $128.82 2234 MAGNOLIA ST 201
390-201-51S $128.82 2306 MAGNOLIA ST 202
390-201-52S $128.82 2312 MAGNOLIA ST 203
390-201-53S $128.82 2318 MAGNOLIA ST 204
390-201-54S $128.82 2324 MAGNOLIA ST 205
390-201-55S $128.82 2330 MAGNOLIA ST 206
390-201-56S $128.82 2336 MAGNOLIA ST 207
390-201-57S $128.82 2410 MAGNOLIA ST 208
390-201-58S $128.82 2416 MAGNOLIA ST 209
390-201-59S $128.82 2422 MAGNOLIA ST 210
390-201-60S $128.82 2428 MAGNOLIA ST 211
390-201-61S $128.82 2434 MAGNOLIA ST 212
390-201-65S $128.82 2446 MAGNOLIA ST 213
390-202-01S $128.82 2123 VALLEY VIEW ST 214
390-202-02S $128.82 2129 VALLEY VIEW ST 215
390-202-03S $128.82 2135 VALLEY VIEW ST 216
390-202-04S $128.82 2209 VALLEY VIEW ST 217
390-202-05S $128.82 2215 VALLEY VIEW ST 218
390-202-06S $128.82 2221 VALLEY VIEW ST 219
390-202-07S $128.82 2227 VALLEY VIEW ST 220
390-202-08S $128.82 2233 VALLEY VIEW ST 221
390-202-09S $128.82 2230 SYCAMORE ST 222
390-202-10S $128.82 2224 SYCAMORE ST 223
390-202-11S $128.82 2218 SYCAMORE ST 224
390-202-12S $128.82 2212 SYCAMORE ST 225
390-202-13S $128.82 2206 SYCAMORE ST 226
390-202-14S $128.82 2200 SYCAMORE ST 227
390-202-15S $128.82 1734 SKELTON ST 228
390-202-16S $128.82 1728 SKELTON ST 229
390-202-17S $128.82 1722 SKELTON ST 230
426
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 8
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
390-202-18S $128.82 1716 SKELTON ST 231
390-202-19S $128.82 1710 SKELTON ST 232
390-202-20S $128.82 1704 SKELTON ST 233
390-202-21S $128.82 1638 SKELTON ST 234
390-202-22S $128.82 1632 SKELTON ST 235
390-203-01S $128.82 2433 MAGNOLIA ST 236
390-203-02S $128.82 2427 MAGNOLIA ST 237
390-203-03S $128.82 2421 MAGNOLIA ST 238
390-203-04S $128.82 2415 MAGNOLIA ST 239
390-203-05S $128.82 2409 MAGNOLIA ST 240
390-203-06S $128.82 2335 MAGNOLIA ST 241
390-203-07S $128.82 2329 MAGNOLIA ST 242
390-203-08S $128.82 2323 MAGNOLIA ST 243
390-203-09S $128.82 2317 MAGNOLIA ST 244
390-203-10S $128.82 2311 MAGNOLIA ST 245
390-203-11S $128.82 2305 MAGNOLIA ST 246
390-203-12S $128.82 2233 MAGNOLIA ST 247
390-203-13S $128.82 2227 MAGNOLIA ST 248
390-203-14S $128.82 2221 MAGNOLIA ST 249
390-203-15S $128.82 2215 MAGNOLIA ST 250
390-203-16S $128.82 2211 MAGNOLIA ST 251
390-203-17S $128.82 2205 MAGNOLIA ST 252
390-204-01S $128.82 1633 SAN CARLOS ST 253
390-204-02S $128.82 1627 SAN CARLOS ST 254
ZONE 8 Total: $32,720.28 Total Parcels: 254
427
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 9
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
390-173-01 $69.81 2719 BIRCH STREET 1
390-172-06 $69.81 2720 BIRCH STREET 2
390-173-16 $69.81 2706 SAGINAW AVENUE 3
390-172-03 $69.81 2802 BIRCH STREET 4
390-171-04 $69.81 1723 SHAFT STREET 5
390-171-03 $69.81 1717 SHAFT STREET 6
390-173-03 $69.81 2731 BIRCH STREET 7
390-173-10 $69.81 2800 SAGINAW AVENUE 8
390-172-02 $69.81 2808 BIRCH STREET 9
390-171-02 $69.81 1711 SHAFT STREET 10
390-172-04 $69.81 2732 BIRCH STREET 11
390-172-01 $69.81 2814 BIRCH STREET 12
390-173-07 $69.81 2813 BIRCH STREET 13
390-173-08 $69.81 2812 SAGINAW AVENUE 14
390-173-06 $69.81 2807 BIRCH STREET 15
390-173-09 $69.81 2806 SAGINAW AVENUE 16
390-173-05 $69.81 2801 BIRCH STREET 17
390-173-04 $69.81 3737 BIRCH STREET 18
390-173-11 $69.81 2736 SAGINAW AVENUE 19
390-173-12 $69.81 2730 SAGINAW AVENUE 20
390-173-13 $69.81 2724 SAGINAW AVENUE 21
390-173-14 $69.81 2718 SAGINAW AVENUE 22
390-173-15 $69.81 2712 SAGINAW AVENUE 23
390-171-01 $69.81 1705 SHAFT STREET 24
390-173-02 $69.81 2725 BIRCH STREET 25
390-173-17 $69.81 2700 SAGINAW AVE 26
390-173-19 $69.81 1709 MITCHELL AVE 27
390-173-18 $69.81 1703 MITCHELL AVE 28
390-173-23 $69.81 1733 MITCHELL AVE 29
390-173-21 $69.81 1721 MITCHELL AVE 30
390-172-05 $69.81 2726 BIRCH STREET 31
390-173-20 $69.81 1715 MITCHELL AVE 32
390-173-22 $69.81 1727 MITCHELL AVE 33
390-181-05 $69.81 1769 MITCHELL AVE 34
390-173-24 $69.81 1739 MITCHELL AVE 35
390-181-01 $69.81 1745 MITCHELL AVE 36
390-181-06 $69.81 1775 MITCHELL AVE 37
390-181-02 $69.81 1751 MITCHELL AVE 38
390-181-03 $69.81 1757 MITCHELL AVE 39
390-181-04 $69.81 1763 MITCHELL AVE 40
390-171-11 $69.81 2804 ASH STREET 41
390-172-14 $69.81 2809 ASH STREET 42
390-172-07 $69.81 1719 BERRY STREET 43
390-173-27 $69.81 1720 BERRY STREET 44
390-173-28 $69.81 1724 BERRY STREET 45
390-172-08 $69.81 1725 BERRY STREET 46
428
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 9
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
390-173-29 $69.81 1730 BERRY STREET 47
390-172-09 $69.81 1731 BERRY STREET 48
390-173-30 $69.81 1736 BERRY STREET 49
390-181-27 $69.81 1742 BERRY STREET 50
390-181-25 $69.81 2718 BLAINE STREET 51
390-181-23 $69.81 2730 BLAINE STREET 52
390-181-22 $69.81 2734 BLAINE STREET 53
390-172-12 $69.81 1720 CLEVELAND ST. 54
390-172-10 $69.81 1732 CLEVELAND ST. 55
390-183-02 $69.81 1765 CLEVELAND ST. 56
390-182-02 $69.81 2811 CLOVER ST. 57
390-182-01 $69.81 2805 CLOVER ST. 58
390-171-05 $69.81 1729 SHAFT AVE. 59
390-181-21 $69.81 2735 FERN CT. 60
390-181-18 $69.81 2717 FERN CT. 61
390-171-10 $69.81 2810 ASH ST. 62
390-172-15 $69.81 2815 ASH ST. 63
390-171-06 $69.81 1735 SHAFT ST. 64
390-184-02 $69.81 2815 VALLEY VIEW ST. 65
390-181-07 $69.81 2742 VALLEY VIEW ST. 66
390-182-06 $69.81 1767 SHAFT ST. 67
390-182-04 $69.81 2823 CLOVER ST. 68
390-183-03 $69.81 1771 CLEVELAND ST. 69
390-185-03 $69.81 2757 VALLEY VIEW ST. 70
390-171-08 $69.81 2822 ASH ST. 71
390-184-01 $69.81 2823 VALLEY VIEW ST. 72
390-183-05 $69.81 1783 CLEVELAND ST. 73
390-183-04 $69.81 1777 CLEVELAND ST. 74
390-185-04 $69.81 2745 VALLEY VIEW ST. 75
390-181-20 $69.81 2729 FERN CT. 76
390-185-01 $69.81 2771 VALLEY VIEW ST. 77
390-181-12 $69.81 2772 VALLEY VIEW ST. 78
390-181-17 $69.81 2712 FERN CT. 79
390-181-14 $69.81 2730 FERN CT. 80
390-173-25 $69.81 2713 BIRCH ST. 81
390-181-24 $69.81 2724 BLAINE CT. 82
390-181-16 $69.81 2718 FERN CT. 83
390-185-02 $69.81 2769 VALLEY VIEW ST 84
390-171-07 $69.81 1741 SHAFT ST. 85
390-181-26 $69.81 1748 BERRY 86
390-181-15 $69.81 2724 FERN COURT 87
390-181-08 $69.81 2748 VALLEY VIEW ST. 88
390-183-01 $69.81 1766 SHAFT ST 89
390-181-11 $69.81 2766 VALLEY VIEW ST. 90
390-181-13 $69.81 2736 FERN CT. 91
390-182-03 $69.81 2817 CLOVER ST. 92
429
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Zone 9
2025/2026
APN Assessment Site Address #
390-181-10 $69.81 2760 VALLEY VIEW ST. 93
390-181-09 $69.81 2754 VALLEY VIEW ST. 94
390-173-26 $69.81 1716 BERRY ST. 95
390-184-03 $69.81 2801 VALLEY VIEW ST. 96
390-172-13 $69.81 ASH ST. 97
390-181-19 $69.81 FERN CT. 98
390-171-09 $69.81 2816 ASH CT. 99
390-182-05 $69.81 1761 SHAFT ST. 100
390-172-11 $69.81 1726 CLEVELAND ST. 101
390-184-04 $69.81 2808 VALLEY VIEW 102
390-184-05 $69.81 2814 VALLEY VIEW 103
390-184-06 $69.81 2820 VALLEY VIEW 104
390-184-07 $69.81 1795 SHAFT STREET 105
390-184-08 $69.81 1789 SHAFT STREET 106
390-182-08 $69.81 1783 SHAFT STREET 107
390-182-09 $69.81 1777 SHAFT STREET 108
390-183-06 $69.81 1776 SHAFT STREET 109
390-183-07 $69.81 1782 SHAFT STREET 110
390-183-08 $69.81 1788 SHAFT STREET 111
390-241-01 $69.81 1808 SHASTA COURT 112
390-241-02 $69.81 1814 SHASTA COURT 113
390-241-03 $69.81 1820 SHASTA COURT 114
390-241-04 $69.81 1819 YERBA COURT 115
390-241-05 $69.81 1813 YERBA COURT 116
390-241-06 $69.81 1807 YERBA COURT 117
390-241-07 $69.81 1806 YERBA COURT 118
390-241-08 $69.81 1812 YERBA COURT 119
390-241-09 $69.81 1818 YERBA COURT 120
390-241-10 $69.81 1817 BERRY STREET 121
390-241-11 $69.81 1811 BERRY STREET 122
390-241-12 $69.81 1805 BERRY STREET 123
390-242-01 $69.81 1804 BERRY STREET 124
390-242-02 $69.81 1810 BERRY STREET 125
390-242-03 $69.81 1816 BERRY STREET 126
390-242-04 $69.81 1822 BERRY STREET 127
390-242-05 $69.81 1828 BERRY STREET 128
390-242-06 $69.81 1834 BERRY STREET 129
390-242-07 $69.81 1840 BERRY STREET 130
390-242-08 $69.81 1846 BERRY STREET 131
390-242-09 $69.81 2718 PARK STREET 132
390-242-10 $69.81 2724 PARK STREET 133
390-242-11 $69.81 2730 PARK STREET 134
390-242-12 $69.81 2736 PARK STREET 135
390-242-13 $69.81 2802 PARK STREET 136
390-242-14 $69.81 2808 PARK STREET 137
390-242-15 $69.81 2814 PARK STREET 138
430
EXHIBIT "E" TO ENGINEER'S REPORT