Agenda, regular meeting, first session — Selma City Council, November 18, 2025

AGENDA

SELMA CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING
November 18, 2025
6:00 p.m.

Selma City Council Chambers
1710 Tucker Street
Selma, CA 93662
Teleconference Phone Number: +1 301 715 8592
Webinar ID: 891 6864 5005 https://zoom.us/j/89168645005

WHEN ON THE PHONE, IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS COUNCIL DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THE AGENDA, PRESS *9 TO “RAISE HAND” AND WE WILL SELECT YOU FROM THE MEETING CUE. PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE AND MUTE YOURSELF.

Notice to Meeting Attendees: Members of the audience shall not engage in disorderly or boisterous conduct including the utterance of threatening or abusive language or other acts which disturb, disrupt or impede or otherwise render the orderly conduct of a City Council meeting infeasible.

CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION: Pastor Jose Alvarez, Iglesia Antioquia
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Trujillo
ROLL CALL: Council Members Avalos, Oceguera, Trujillo, Mayor Pro Tem Guerra, and Mayor Robertson
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Any council member who has a potential conflict of interest may now identify the item and recuse themselves from discussing and voting on the matter.

AGENDA CHANGES OR DELETIONS: To better accommodate members of the public or inconvenience in the order of presentation, items on the agenda may not be presented or acted upon in the order listed. Additions to Agenda may be added only pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2 (b).

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
NOTICE(S) TO THE PUBLIC: At this time, any member of the public may address the City Council regarding any item on the regular meeting agenda over which the Council has jurisdiction. No action or discussion will be taken on any item not on the agenda. Issues raised will be referred to the City Manager for review. Members of the public should limit their remarks to three (3) minutes.
1 1 - SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
1-1 Special Presentation –Proclamation Presented by the Offices of Senator Caballero and Assemblymember Arambula, Recognizing the Life and Contributions of Former Mayor Dennis Lujan
Moreno
1-2 Special Presentation – Fonroche Solar Streetlights Presentation Honn 1-3 Special Presentation – Madison.AI Demonstration Keene 2 - CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the consent calendar category are considered routine. The complete consent calendar will be enacted by one motion by ROLL CALL VOTE. For purposes of discussion, any Council member may have an item removed from the consent calendar and made part of the regular agenda. The council can then approve the remainder of the consent calendar.
2-1 Approval – Check Register dated 10/15/25 – Check Numbers 88194 through 88294, and Cal-Card Transactions period 8/23/25 through 9/22/25 Moreno
2-2 Approval - Consideration of Resolutions 2025-121R, 2025-5CEC, 2025-3PFA and 2025-3SRDA Approving Changes to Banking Authorized Signers for City of Selma, the Selma Successors Agency, Selma Community Enhancement Corporation, and the Selma Public Financing Authority
Moreno
2-3 Approval - Consideration of Resolutions 2025-118R Approving Changes to Banking Authorized Signers for City of Selma Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund – CITY LAIF Account
Moreno
2-4 Approval - Consideration of Resolution 2025-119R approving Final Tract Map for Tract 6244, Subdivision Agreement, and Notice of Intention to Annex Property to Community Services District 2006-01, Zone B Keene
2-5 Approval - Consideration of Resolution 2025-120R Authorizing the City Manager to Execute all Contract Agreements, Program Subcontractor Agreements, and Any Amendments Thereto with the California High Speed Rail Authority
Keene
3– DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
• City Manager • Community Services
• City Attorney • Finance
• Deputy City Manager
(Development Services)
• Fire
• Administrative Services • PIO / Communications
• City Clerk • Police
• Public Works
2 4 – NEW BUSINESS
4-1 Action Item - Consideration of the Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) Advisory Board Appointment
Moreno
5 - FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council requests for future agenda items. Not subject to public comment. Items require a consensus. 6 – COUNCIL REPORTS / COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Brief report by Council members on City related functions as authorized by the Brown Act.

ADJOURNMENT
Upcoming Council Meetings
• City Council Regular Meeting, Tuesday, December 2, 2025 • City Council Regular Meeting, Tuesday, December 16, 2025 Agendas for all City Council meetings are posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting at the Council Chambers, 1710 Tucker Street. The City of Selma complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA of 1990) and Government Code Section 54953(g), and the City Council has adopted a reasonable accommodation policy to swiftly resolve accommodation requests. The policy can also be found on the City’s website here. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office, (559) 891-2200, to make an accommodation request, or to obtain an electronic or printed copy of the policy.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
I, Sara M. Carlson, City Clerk for the City of Selma, declare under penalty of perjury that I posted the above Regular City Council Agenda for the meeting of November 18, 2025, near the front entrance of City Hall located at 1710 Tucker Street, Selma, CA and on the City’s website www.cityofselma.com on November 6, 2025.
/s/
Sara M. Carlson
City Clerk
3 4
1-1
Special Presentation –
Proclamation Presented by the
Offices of Senator Caballero
and Assemblymember
Arambula, Recognizing the
Life and Contributions of
Former Mayor Dennis Lujan
5 6
ITEM NO: 1-1

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: November 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Presentation of a Proclamation Honoring the Life and Legacy of the Honorable Dennis Lujan
SUBMITTED: Jose Moreno, Public Information Officer
APPROVED: John Kunkel, Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and acknowledge a proclamation presented by the Offices of Senator Anna M.

Caballero and Assembly Member Joaquin Arambula honoring the late Honorable Dennis Lujan for his lifetime of public service and dedication to the Selma community.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Selma is honored to welcome representatives from the Offices of Senator Anna M. Caballero (14th Senate District) and Assembly Member Joaquin Arambula (31st Assembly District) for a special presentation recognizing the life and contributions of former Mayor Dennis Lujan.

Mr. Lujan served the City of Selma for nearly three decades on the City Council, including multiple terms as Mayor. Beyond his public service, he was a small-business owner whose downtown barbershop became a cornerstone of community connection. The proclamation from the State Legislature celebrates his leadership, integrity, and enduring legacy in Selma.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None
Attachments:
☐ Resolution
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☒ Other Proclamation by Senator
Caballero and Assembly
Member Arambula
7 8
9 10
11 12
1-2
Special Presentation –
Fonroche Solar Streetlights
Presentation
13 14
ITEM NO: 1-2

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: November 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Fonroche Solar Streetlights Special Presentation SUBMITTED: Michael Honn, Public Works Director
APPROVED: John Kunkel, Interim City Manager
DISCUSSION:

Fonroche will conduct a presentation of their solar streetlighting products for the City Council. A sample of the solar streetlights were presented to Council previously as part of the Clean California Grant along Second Street. The lighting is the preferred standard for the grant project and was adopted within the Downtown Cultural Arts District (lantern style).

Attachments:
☐ Resolution
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☐ Other
List:
15 16
1-3
Special Presentation –
Madison.AI
Demonstration
17 18
ITEM NO: 1-3

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: November 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Madison.AI Demonstration
SUBMITTED: Jerome Keene, Deputy City Manager
APPROVED: John Kunkel, Interim City Manager
DISCUSSION:

Staff will present Madison.AI, an internal platform utilized for maintaining institutional knowledge and promoting consistent policy and decision-making.

Madison AI was co-founded by a local government agency, Washoe County in Nevada, to be a platform that utilizes an agency’s documented history, such as resolutions, ordinances, agreements, and staff reports, within a local language model (LLM) to allow for queries and analysis of local issues. The platform can also provide draft staff reports or briefs, timelines, or budget summaries, amongst other tasks.

The efficiencies gained by the platform ensure that staff, existing and new, at all levels of the organization, have access to consistent information that spans decades. Currently, Madison.AI is leveraging over 5,300 digital documents, such as the General Plan, resolutions from 1946 to present, 447 council agenda packets, and meeting transcripts available from YouTube. This information may be queried inclusive or exclusive of outside sources, allowing for specialized and broadened comparative purposes, as necessary to make informed decisions.

The licensing for the platform was budgeted for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 within Fund 704 – Data Processing.

Attachments:
☐ Resolution
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☐ Other
List:
19 20
2-1
Approval –
Check Register dated 10/15/25 –
Check Numbers 88194 through
88294, and Cal-Card
Transactions
8/23/25 through 9/22/25
21 22
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK

DATE VENDOR NAME CHECK DESCRIPTION CATEGORY AMOUNT
88230 10/15/25 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AD -UNEMPLOYMENT 4/1-6/30/25 17,234.40 88254 10/15/25 M3 PLANNING, INC. AD -MADISON.AI GOVERNANCE MODULE 23,000.00 88266 10/15/25 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC AD -OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,120.04 88209 10/15/25 ROD CARSEY BD -PLAN CHECKS SEPTEMBER 2025 5,281.61 88221 10/15/25 COSTANZO & ASSOCIATES CA -LEGAL SERVICES APRIL 2025 32,909.83 88199 10/15/25 RYAN ANDERSEN CS -SAC MOJADA SET CONSTRUCTION 550.00 88226 10/15/25 LIA CHRISTINE DEWEY CS -MOJADA DRAMATURGY 200.00 88229 10/15/25 DONAGHY SALES, LLC CS -ALCOHOL FOR SELMA LIVE 9/26/25 1,936.35 88232 10/15/25 JACOB J GALINDO CS -SAC HADESTOWN LIGHTING DESIGN 300.00 88233 10/15/25 DOMINIC GRIJALVA CS -SAC REIMBURSEMENT FOR LINKTREE PAYMENTS 9/1-9/23/25 216.00 88253 10/15/25 JEREMY LITTLE / LITTLE N' STITCH

DESIGNS
CS -FINDING NEMO JR T-SHIRTS 1,698.72
88258 10/15/25 MONIQUE MONTES CS -SAC HADESTOWN CO-STAGE MANAGER 150.00 88259 10/15/25 JACOB MORENO / THE MORENO'S CS -SAC LIVE MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT 800.00 88261 10/15/25 MV PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, INC. CS -SENIOR TRIP TO TABLE MOUNTAIN 9/9/25 115.00 88267 10/15/25 CHRISTOPHER ORTIZ-BELCHER CS -SELMA ART CENTER MARKETING 1,777.32 88272 10/15/25 JAVIER PUGA CS -SAC RENT COSTUME REIMBURSEMENT 188.84 88277 10/15/25 ANNAROSA SALAZAR CS -CKP FINDING NEMO CO-DIRECTOR & MAKE UP DESIGN 450.00 88278 10/15/25 SELMA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CS -SHS STADIUM 7/3/25 1,250.00 88281 10/15/25 SOAPSTONE MEDIA, INC. / MVP

VISUALS
CS -SPARCS INFLATABLE EVENT ARCH 3,085.00
88283 10/15/25 GLENDA LEANNE DAWN STEWART CS -CKP FINDING NEMO JR & HADESTOWN CO-CHOREO & CO-STAGE

MANAGER
500.00
88286 10/15/25 THEATERMANIA.COM, INC. CS -TICKETING SERVICE MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION 10/1-10/31/25 248.00 88293 10/15/25 SAVANNAH WEST CS -CKP FINDING NEMO JR CO-CHOREOGRAPHY 100.00 88294 10/15/25 JESSICA RENEE WILLIAMS CS -CKP FINDING NEMO JR VOCAL DIRECTOR 300.00 88219 10/15/25 COLUMN SOFTWARE PBC DS -PH NOTICE SELMA NORTH ANNEXATION 184.76 88194 10/15/25 A&M CONSULTING ENGINEERS EN -ENGINEERING SERVICES 2ND ST FROM SR99, TACTICAL URBANISM, BRANCH CANAL PARKWAY THROUGH 3/31/25
G 66,164.70
88204 10/15/25 BAUER COMPRESSORS INC. FD -SCBA FACEPIECE 461.02 88206 10/15/25 BLUETRITON BRANDS INC. FD -STA 3 WATER SERVICE 6/1-6/30/25 119.48 88207 10/15/25 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC FD -MEDICAL SUPPLIES 70.60 88235 10/15/25 JUSTIN HILL / FAILSAFE TESTING FD -ANNUAL GROUND LADDER TESTING 2,096.00 88236 10/15/25 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. FD -AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS & MAINTENANCE 547.13 88237 10/15/25 IMAGETREND INC. FD -EPCR SOFTWARE SEPTEMBER 2025 479.32 88240 10/15/25 KALMIKOV ENTERPRISES, INC. / FIRE

APARATUS SOLUTIONS
FD -E112 REPAIRS 4,755.10
88248 10/15/25 L.N. CURTIS & SONS FD -STRUCTURE BOOTS 1,259.92 88252 10/15/25 LIFE-ASSIST INC. FD -MEDICAL SUPPLIES 3,551.24 88255 10/15/25 MADERA UNIFORM / METRO UNIFORM FD -NAME PLATES 82.22 88256 10/15/25 JACOB MARTINEZ FD -PARAMEDIC RECERTIFICATION REIMBURSEMENT 298.00 88257 10/15/25 MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC. FD -MEDICAL SUPPLIES 2,158.26 88273 10/15/25 ADORA PULLINGER FD -AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REIMBURSEMENT 306.18 88275 10/15/25 DANIEL ANTHONY RIVAS FD -REIMBURSEMENT FOR STRIKE TEAM -ONC IMT STAGING 9/4-9/6 R 2,408.62 88200 10/15/25 AT&T FI -PD FIRE ALARM 9/20-10/19/25 449.11 88201 10/15/25 AT&T FI -PD EMERGENCY CALL RECORDING 9/23-10/22/25 474.37 88202 10/15/25 AT&T FI -TELEPHONE 8/12-9/11/25 200.90
88203 10/15/25 AT&T MOBILITY FI -TELEPHONE MDT'S 8/12-9/11/25 1,780.80 88227 10/15/25 DIVISION OF THE STATE FI -ADA FEE 4/1-6/30/25 R 155.20 88228 10/15/25 DIVISION OF THE STATE FI -ADA FEE 7/1-9/30/25 R 121.60 88239 10/15/25 JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY FI -ALARM SERVICES 10/1/25-12/31/25 5,066.39 88268 10/15/25 PG&E FI -UTILITIES SEPTEMBER 2025 849.92 88269 10/15/25 PG&E FI -UTILITIES SEPTEMBER 2025 9,253.73 88271 10/15/25 PITNEY BOWES BANK INC FI -POSTAGE REFILL 29.08 88288 10/15/25 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM FI -CALCARD CHARGES 8/23-9/22/25 64,343.17 88290 10/15/25 VALLEY SHREDDING LLC FI -SHREDDING SERVICE CITY HALL 24.00 88291 10/15/25 VERIZON WIRELESS FI -CELL PHONES AND AIRCARDS 8/19-9/18/25 2,388.65 88212 10/15/25 CENCAL AUTO & TRUCK PARTS, INC /

NAPA AUTO PARTS
FL & FD -AUTO PARTS 2,545.36
88243 10/15/25 KIMBALL MIDWEST FL -REAMER 267.93
88251 10/15/25 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF FL -TIRES & ALIGNMENT 375.92 88264 10/15/25 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS FL -AUTO PARTS 124.96 88274 10/15/25 QUINN COMPANY FL -REACHLIFT RENTAL 9/17/25 2,688.70 88276 10/15/25 S&S INVESTMENT CLUB / NICK'S

CUSTOM GOLF CARS
FL -DIAGNOSIS FEE UNIT#1404 REC DEPT GOLF CART 325.02

CHECK REGISTER REPORT
132
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK

DATE VENDOR NAME CHECK DESCRIPTION CATEGORY AMOUNT

CHECK REGISTER REPORT
88280 10/15/25 SNAP-ON INCORPORATED FL -CRIMP CUTTER & WRENCHES 845.71 88285 10/15/25 SWANSON-FAHRNEY FORD SALES INC FL & FD -AUTO PARTS & SERVICE 5,077.26 88208 10/15/25 MARIA CARRILLO HR -SALARY PER TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 1,935.00 88222 10/15/25 CSJVRMA HR -2025/2026 2ND QUARTER DEPOSIT (OCT-DEC) 608,383.63 88224 10/15/25 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA HR -DENTAL CLAIMS 8/22-9/25/25 16,582.10 88231 10/15/25 MARGARET FALLERT HR -SALARY PER TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 7,730.73 88234 10/15/25 RAUL R HERRERA JR / ECN

POLYGRAPH & INVESTIGATIONS
HR -POLYGRAPH SERVICES 9/18-9/23/25 1,000.00
88238 10/15/25 INSURANCE AND BENEFITS TRUST HR -POLICE EMPLOYEES LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUMS JULY-OCT 2025 2,603.00 88241 10/15/25 KENT M. KAWAGOE, PH.D. HR -PRE EMPLOYMENT PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAM 7/17/25 350.00 88242 10/15/25 JEFF KESTLY HR -RETIREE MEDICAL PREMIUM REIMBURSEMENT 209.77 88245 10/15/25 KINGS INDUSTRIAL OCCUPATION HR -PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS & DRUG TESTS 1,846.44 88247 10/15/25 JOHN KUNKEL HR -SALARY PER INTERIM CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT 5,493.36 88249 10/15/25 LABOR FIRST, LLC / RETIRE FIRST HR -RETIREE POST 65 PREMIUMS 5,151.60 88223 10/15/25 DATAPATH LLC IT -MANAGED SERVICES & MICROSOFT 365 MONTHLY BILLING AUGUST & SEPTEMBER 2025, LAPTOP BUNDLE
34,468.57
88198 10/15/25 AMERICAN INTEGRATED SERVICES PD -HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT 6,775.00 88214 10/15/25 CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FORMS PD -EPO FORMS 108.89 88225 10/15/25 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PD -BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS & PRE EMPLOYMENT FINGERPRINT AUGUST 2025
274.00
88250 10/15/25 LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY, LTD. PD -BEAN BAG IMPACT ROUNDS, SPONGE ROUND SPIN, POWDER 1,108.01 88260 10/15/25 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. PD -SYSTEM UPGRADE AGREEMENT 57,706.43 88270 10/15/25 PITNEY BOWES BANK INC PD -POSTAGE 306.28 88289 10/15/25 UNITY IT PD -MANAGED SERVICE 8/1-8/31/25 5,275.60 88244 10/15/25 KINGS BASIN WATER AUTHORITY PL -ASSESSMENT OF FISCAL YEAR 2026 MEMBERSHIP DUES 7,000.00 88195 10/15/25 A&S PUMP SERVICE PW -REPLACED MOTOR & WIRE PIONEER VILLAGE PUMP 4,535.06 88196 10/15/25 A-C ELECTRIC COMPANY PW -TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIRS FLORAL/MCCALL/WRIGHT 2,353.28 88197 10/15/25 MARK ALVES / ALVES ELECTRIC PW -TROUBLESHOOT GARAGE DOOR OPENER FIRE STA A ST &

INSTALLED GFCI RECEPTACLES DOWNTOWN TREE/LIGHT PROJECT
2,075.00
88205 10/15/25 BENNETT WEST LLC PW -IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 5.97 88213 10/15/25 CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY, LLC. PW -JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,259.44 88218 10/15/25 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 PW -UNIFORM SERVICE,MOPS,MATS 3,755.64 88220 10/15/25 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL PW -CONCRETE BOX,LID AND NAME PLATE -DOWNTOWN TREE PROJECT 335.22 88246 10/15/25 KRC SAFETY CO INC PW -STREET SIGNS ALUMINUM AND FILM 4,584.06 88263 10/15/25 NELSON'S HARDWARE, INC. PW -BUILDING, STREETS, PARKS SUPPLIES 301.86 88279 10/15/25 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, LLC. PW -IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 1,157.72 88282 10/15/25 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT PW -CIVIL WAGES ASSESSMENT PD SURVEILLANCE INTEGRATION 2,785.70 88287 10/15/25 TOM MALLOY CORPORATION PW -RENTAL OF TRENCHER FOR DOWNTOWN TREE/LIGHTING PROJECT 6,221.64 88292 10/15/25 DANIEL VIVEROS / D&G FENCE PW -REMOVE & RELOCATE FENCE FIRE STA 2 1,900.00 TOTAL 1,071,320.44
10/15/25 STATE OF CA DEPT OF HEALTH PP-GEMT IGT 136,585.95 10/15/25 BCI HOLDINGS AD -HEALTHNOW WEEKLY CLAIMS 10/3-10/9/25 37,944.17 10/20/25 BCI HOLDINGS AD -HEALTHNOW WEEKLY CLAIMS 10/10-10/16/25 18,684.70 10/20/25 BCI HOLDINGS AD -HEALTHNOW PREMIUM DUE NOVEMBER 2025 52,173.18 TOTAL 108,802.05
Wire Payments
ACH
142
Council Approval Date:

Check Numbers - Inclusive: 88194 through 88294
Successor Check Numbers - Inclusive: through
THE ABOVE LISTED CHECK NUMBERS ARE WITHIN THE 2025/2026 BUDGET AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

THE FOLLOWING ELECTED OFFICIALS HAVE APPROVED THE ATTACHED "CHECK REGISTER REPORT."
Mayor
Mayor Pro-Tem
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Check Register Report

CITY OF SELMA
11/18/2025
152
26 EMPLOYEE NAME TRANSACTION DATE VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PURCHASE ACCOUNT # AMOUNT ALEJANDRO ALVAREZ 08/26/2025 FULL CIRCLE TRAINING SOLUTIONS STANDARD NIBRS (CIBRS) TRAINING (CRIME ANALYST KASSANDRA MARTINEZ) 100-2100-610.915.000 459.00 ALEJANDRO ALVAREZ 08/29/2025 HOMES TO SUITES BY HILTON D.A.R.E. GRADUATION FOR OFFICER PLASCENCIA 100-2200-610.915.000 159.47 ALEJANDRO ALVAREZ 08/29/2025 CHEVRON GAS STATION FUEL - OFFICER PLASCENCIA D.A.R.E. GRADUATION 701-9200-600.257.000 43.27 ALEJANDRO ALVAREZ 09/02/2025 LITTLE CAESARS MEAL FOR EXPLORERS (REIMBURSABLE) 100-2300-600.250.000 41.07 ANDREW GUZMAN 08/30/2025 EXPEDIA HOTEL FOR TRAINING 100-2200-610.915.000 337.08 ANDREW GUZMAN 09/03/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS CARWASH SUPPLIES 100-2200-600.250.000 10.84 ANDREW GUZMAN 09/17/2025 CUTRATE BATTERIES TWO RADIO EARPIECES FOR SHELTER 100-2200-600.250.000 153.00 ANIMAL SERVICES 08/26/2025 FACEBOOK ADS PROMOTIONAL AD FOR DOG ADOPTION 100-4900-600.215.000 17.00 ANIMAL SERVICES 08/27/2025 WALMART CLEANING SUPPLIES 100-4900-600.250.050 253.03 ANIMAL SERVICES 08/27/2025 FACEBOOK ADS PROMOTIONAL AD FOR DOG ADOPTION 100-4900-600.215.000 19.00 ANIMAL SERVICES 08/28/2025 FACEBOOK ADS PROMOTIONAL AD FOR DOG ADOPTION 100-4900-600.215.000 21.00 ANIMAL SERVICES 08/29/2025 FACEBOOK ADS PROMOTIONAL AD FOR DOG ADOPTION 100-4900-600.215.000 24.00 ANIMAL SERVICES 09/05/2025 AMAZON DEWORMER 100-4900-600.400.700 161.63 ANIMAL SERVICES 09/05/2025 AMAZON FILE FOLDERS AND FILE HOLDER 100-4900-600.250.050 36.47 ANIMAL SERVICES 09/05/2025 AMAZON KITTEN FORMULA 100-4900-600.400.700 125.82 ANIMAL SERVICES 09/09/2025 FACEBOOK ADS PROMOTIONAL AD FOR DOG ADOPTION 100-4900-600.215.000 24.04 ANIMAL SERVICES 09/18/2025 ELM FEED DOG FOOD 100-4900-600.400.700 584.85 ANIMAL SERVICES 09/20/2025 WALMART CAT FOOD AND CLEANING SUPPLIES 100-4900-600.250.050 136.48 ANIMAL SERVICES 09/20/2025 AMAZON RESCUE DISINFECTANT 100-4900-600.250.050 231.04 ANIMAL SERVICES 09/22/2025 AMAZON TONER FOR PRINTER 100-4900-600.250.050 83.49 ASHLEY GRECO 09/11/2025 WALMART TRAINING TASKBOOKS 100-2525-600.100.000 55.52 CALEB GARCIA 09/02/2025 EAGLE MART GAS STATION FUEL 701-9200-600.257.000 54.00 CALEB GARCIA 09/05/2025 SHELL GAS STATION SUPPLIES (BEVERAGES FOR SEARCH WARRANT) 100-2100-600.250.000 31.92 CALEB GARCIA 09/12/2025 SINCLAIR GAS STATION SUPPLIES (MOTOR OIL) 100-2100-600.250.000 10.07 CALEB GARCIA 09/18/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES (THUMB DRIVES) 100-2100-600.250.000 36.87 CALEB GARCIA 09/18/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES (THUMB DRIVES) 100-2100-600.250.000 277.63 CITY OF SELMA SNG RES1 09/02/2025 CHINA PEAK LANDING HIGH SIERRA LIGHTENING COMPLEX INCIDENT - FUEL (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 158.85 CITY OF SELMA SNG RES2 08/22/2025 THE HOME DEPOT ST 2 DRYER PARTS 100-2525-600.375.000 24.85 CITY OF SELMA SNG RES2 08/22/2025 WALMART ST 2 GLASSWARE 100-2525-600.250.000 25.13 CITY OF SELMA SNG RES2 09/21/2025 ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR GARNET INCIDENT (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 100-2525-600.400.000 1,772.55 CITY OF SELMA STATION 1 08/31/2025 SHAVER LAKE GAS & DELI HIGH SIERRA COMPLEX INCIDENT FUEL (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 82.99 CITY OF SELMA STATION 1 09/01/2025 SHAVER LAKE GAS & DELI HIGH SIERRA COMPLEX INCIDENT FUEL (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 107.60 CITY OF SELMA STATION 1 09/03/2025 SHAVER LAKE GAS & DELI HIGH SIERRA COMPLEX INCIDENT FUEL (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 60.00 CITY OF SELMA STATION 1 09/08/2025 SHAVER LAKE GAS & DELI HIGH SIERRA COMPLEX INCIDENT FUEL (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 110.70 CITY OF SELMA STATION 1 09/12/2025 ACE HARDWARE CHAINSAW PART 100-2525-600.375.000 4.33 CYNTHIA GOMEZ 08/26/2025 POLICE RECORDS & INFORMATION RECORDS CLASS FOR TINA MALDONALDO 100-2100-610.915.000 602.64 CYNTHIA GOMEZ 08/26/2025 POLICE RECORDS & INFORMATION RECORDS CLASS FOR TONI FRANK 100-2100-610.915.000 602.64 DANIEL DIAZ 08/29/2025 WESTERN AG & TURF, INC. DISPOSABLE COVERALLS 600-2600-600.280.000 16.51 DANIEL DIAZ 08/29/2025 FASTRAK VIOLATION CENTER LONG DISTANCE TRANSFER BRIDGE TOLL 600-2600-600.400.000 10.50 DANIEL DIAZ 08/29/2025 FASTRAK VIOLATION CENTER LONG DISTANCE TRANSFER BRIDGE TOLL 600-2600-600.400.000 13.00 DANIEL DIAZ 09/03/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS LIGHT BULBS 600-2600-600.457.000 8.67 DANIEL DIAZ 09/11/2025 ACE HARDWARE O2 MACHINE PARTS 600-2600-600.280.000 37.63 DANIEL DIAZ 09/12/2025 WALMART MEDIC HIRING PROCESS 100-2500-610.920.000 62.66 DANIEL DIAZ 09/13/2025 ROSA'S PIZZA EXPO MARKERS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 600-2600-600.100.000 10.00 DANIEL DIAZ 09/18/2025 TACKLE BOX GAS STATION FUEL 701-9200-600.257.000 20.00 DANIEL DIAZ 09/18/2025 AMAZON IPAD CASES 600-2600-600.250.000 126.22 DONAVON FULLNER 09/06/2025 CHEVRON GAS STATION EMIGRANT INCIDENT (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 54.14 DONAVON FULLNER 09/06/2025 SHELL GAS STATION EMIGRANT INCIDENT (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 66.99 City of Selma
US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions
Period: 08/23/2025 - 09/22/2025
US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions Page 1 of 8
172
EMPLOYEE NAME TRANSACTION DATE VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PURCHASE ACCOUNT # AMOUNT City of Selma
US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions
Period: 08/23/2025 - 09/22/2025
DONAVON FULLNER 09/06/2025 SHELL GAS STATION EMIGRANT INCIDENT (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 45.31 DONAVON FULLNER 09/09/2025 HYATT PLACE EMIGRANT INCIDENT (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 100-2525-600.400.000 634.27 DONAVON FULLNER 09/13/2025 ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR HIGH SIERRA LIGHTENING COMPLEX (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 100-2525-600.400.000 1,313.31 DONAVON FULLNER 09/19/2025 CHEVRON GAS STATION EMIGRANT INCIDENT (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 61.80 DONAVON FULLNER 09/19/2025 THE MILL CASINO HOTEL EMIGRANT INCIDENT (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 100-2525-600.400.000 207.35 DONAVON FULLNER 09/20/2025 CHEVRON GAS STATION EMIGRANT INCIDENT (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 84.30 EMS DIVISION 551 09/03/2025 CHEVRON GAS STATION FUEL 701-9200-600.257.000 86.27 EMS DIVISION 551 09/08/2025 CHEVRON GAS STATION FUEL 701-9200-600.257.000 103.45 EMS DIVISION 553 08/30/2025 SHAVER LAKE GAS & DELI HIGH SIERRA LIGHTENING COMPLEX INCIDENT (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 77.16 EMS DIVISION 553 09/02/2025 SHAVER LAKE GAS & DELI HIGH SIERRA LIGHTENING COMPLEX INCIDENT (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 701-9200-600.257.000 41.79 EMS DIVISION 554 08/28/2025 CHEVRON GAS STATION FUEL 701-9200-600.257.000 91.85 EMS DIVISION 555 09/04/2025 CHEVRON GAS STATION FUEL 701-9200-600.257.000 93.77 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 08/29/2025 MICROSOFT 365 CREDIT REFUND 704-9600-600.470.000 (99.99) FINANCE DEPARTMENT 08/31/2025 CANVA SUBSCRIPTION 100-1700-600.215.000 172.49 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/16/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-1400-600.100.000 13.13 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/16/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-1600-600.100.000 26.26 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/16/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-1500-600.100.000 8.75 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/16/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-3100-600.100.000 4.38 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/16/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-3200-600.100.000 4.38 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/16/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-9600-600.100.000 4.38 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/16/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-5300-600.100.000 8.75 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/16/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-1100-600.100.000 8.75 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/16/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-1300-600.100.000 8.75 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/17/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-1100-600.100.000 0.90 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/17/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-1300-600.100.000 0.90 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/17/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-1400-600.100.000 1.35 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/17/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-1600-600.100.000 2.69 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/17/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-1500-600.100.000 0.90 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/17/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-3100-600.100.000 0.45 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/17/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-3200-600.100.000 0.45 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/17/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-9600-600.100.000 0.45 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 09/17/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-5300-600.100.000 0.90 HUMBERTO SALAS 08/22/2025 SHELL GAS STATION FUEL 269-2100-600.257.000 60.00 HUMBERTO SALAS 08/26/2025 CIRCLE K GAS STATION FUEL 269-2100-600.257.000 36.00 HUMBERTO SALAS 08/29/2025 CIRCLE K GAS STATION FUEL 269-2100-600.257.000 54.00 HUMBERTO SALAS 09/04/2025 CIRCLE K GAS STATION FUEL 269-2100-600.257.000 45.00 HUMBERTO SALAS 09/10/2025 CIRCLE K GAS STATION FUEL 269-2100-600.257.000 47.00 HUMBERTO SALAS 09/16/2025 SHELL GAS STATION FUEL 269-2100-600.257.000 65.00 JANIE VENEGAS 09/11/2025 HARRAH'S NEOGOV CONFERENCE ROOM CANCELLATION 100-1400-610.920.000 (180.27) JANIE VENEGAS 09/11/2025 HARRAH'S NEOGOV CONFERENCE ROOM CANCELLATION 100-1400-610.920.000 (180.27) JANIE VENEGAS 09/11/2025 HARRAH'S NEOGOV CONFERENCE ROOM CANCELLATION 100-1400-610.920.000 (180.27) JEROME KEENE 08/29/2025 FRESNO COUNTY CLERK CEQA RECORDING FEE 100-3100-600.210.000 50.00 JEROME KEENE 08/29/2025 FRESNO COUNTY CLERK CEQA RECORDING FEE 100-3100-600.210.000 1.15 JEROME KEENE 09/03/2025 THE HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES (CVTC) 274-1500-600.250.000 150.12 JEROME KEENE 09/03/2025 THE HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES (CVTC) 274-1500-600.250.000 934.88 JEROME KEENE 09/03/2025 THE HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES (CVTC) 274-1500-600.250.000 183.46 JEROME KEENE 09/04/2025 FRESNO COUNTY CLERK CEQA RECORDING FEE 100-3100-600.210.000 50.00 JEROME KEENE 09/04/2025 FRESNO COUNTY CLERK CEQA RECORDING FEE 100-3100-600.210.000 1.15 US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions Page 2 of 8
182
EMPLOYEE NAME TRANSACTION DATE VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PURCHASE ACCOUNT # AMOUNT City of Selma
US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions
Period: 08/23/2025 - 09/22/2025
JEROME KEENE 09/05/2025 FEDEX RETURN OF CITY EQUIPMENT (ROSALES) 100-1525-600.100.000 115.77 JEROME KEENE 09/10/2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OF OFFICIALS PERMIT TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION REGISTRATION 100-3200-610.915.000 480.00 JEROME KEENE 09/15/2025 RAT INCORPORATED PORTA POTTY RENTAL (CVTC) 274-1500-600.500.000 517.50 JEROME KEENE 09/17/2025 THE HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES (CVTC) 274-1500-600.250.000 254.27 JEROME KEENE 09/17/2025 THE HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES (CVTC) 274-1500-600.250.000 321.93 JONATHON KUTKA 08/23/2025 ULINE APPARATUS EQUIPMENT 295-2525-600.250.000 194.92 JONATHON KUTKA 08/24/2025 ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR OOC GIFFORD INCIDENT RENTAL CAR (WILL BE REIMBURSED) 100-2525-600.400.000 1,545.01 JONATHON KUTKA 09/03/2025 DPH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES EMT RECERTIFICATION 100-2525-610.917.000 115.00 JONATHON KUTKA 09/03/2025 ACE HARDWARE KEYS FOR LOGISTICS CENTER 295-2525-600.250.000 14.61 JONATHON KUTKA 09/16/2025 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS FF ACADEMY WATER BOTTLES 295-2525-600.250.000 38.04 JORDAN WEBSTER 08/21/2025 RILEYS TAPROOM FIREMED MEETING 100-2500-610.920.000 67.21 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/21/2025 THE HOME DEPOT BRUTE 55 GAL TRASH FOR NEW FACILITY 603-5500-600.250.000 577.81 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/21/2025 THE HOME DEPOT FLOOR MAT FOR NEW FACILITY 603-5500-600.250.000 108.37 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/25/2025 AFFINITY TRUCK CENTER RT 147 REPAIRS 603-5500-600.400.000 310.34 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/25/2025 FUTURE FORD OF CLOVIS RT 156 A/C REAR REPAIR 603-5500-600.400.000 518.09 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/25/2025 FUTURE FORD OF CLOVIS RT 162 NEW TRANSMISSION RR 603-5500-600.400.000 1,050.00 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/25/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS RT 166 BRAKE ROTOR 603-5500-600.256.000 160.54 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/25/2025 AFFINITY TRUCK CENTER RT 175 REPAIRS 603-5500-600.400.000 1,154.90 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/25/2025 FRONTIER FASTENER RT SHOP SUPPLIES 603-5500-600.250.000 49.35 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/27/2025 FUTURE FORD OF CLOVIS KINGSBURG TROLLY REPAIR 603-5500-600.400.000 1,955.22 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/27/2025 AMAZON RT ARBOC FLEET FRONT AIR BAG 603-5500-600.256.000 340.60 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/28/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS 12/24 VOLTS GAS/EV FLEET CHGR 603-5500-600.256.000 594.67 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/28/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT 146 STARTER BATTERY 603-5500-600.256.000 241.73 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/28/2025 FUTURE FORD OF CLOVIS RT 150 A/C REPAIR 603-5500-600.400.000 400.80 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/28/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT 193/195 VOLTAGE REGULATOR 603-5500-600.256.000 607.83 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/28/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS STOCK INVENTORY PARTS PM 603-5500-600.256.000 1,676.94 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/29/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS RT 171 FAN BLADE 603-5500-600.256.000 85.78 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/29/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS RT 175/STOCK KNOCK SENSOR 603-5500-600.256.000 57.54 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/29/2025 CUMMINS, INC. RT 193 PM PARTS 603-5500-600.256.000 2,198.46 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/29/2025 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS RT EL DORADO FLEET COOLANT 603-5500-600.256.000 523.57 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 08/30/2025 AMAZON RT SHOP SUPLLIES 603-5500-600.250.000 212.55 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/03/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS RT 200 COP COIL 603-5500-600.256.000 88.69 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/03/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT 200/201 SPK PLUG/IGNITION CO 603-5500-600.256.000 307.11 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/03/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT ARBOC FLEET BLOWER RESISTOR 603-5500-600.256.000 515.26 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/04/2025 SOUTHERN TIRE MART RT 194 REAR TIRES NEW 2X 603-5500-600.256.000 1,550.54 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/04/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS RT 200/201 SPK PLUG 603-5500-600.256.000 60.79 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/06/2025 AUTOZONE OIL COOLER HOSE 603-5500-600.256.000 49.89 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/06/2025 AUTOZONE OIL COOLER HOSE 603-5500-600.256.000 47.71 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/08/2025 AFFINITY TRUCK CENTER RT 179 REPAIR 603-5500-600.400.000 577.15 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/08/2025 SOUTHERN TIRE MART RT 184 NEW TIRES 4X 603-5500-600.256.000 744.95 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/08/2025 AFFINITY TRUCK CENTER RT 193 TUNE UP 603-5500-600.400.000 2,182.00 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/08/2025 SOUTHERN TIRE MART RT 233 NEW RF TIRE 1X 603-5500-600.256.000 202.13 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/08/2025 SOUTHERN TIRE MART RT ARBOC TIRE 1X 603-5500-600.400.000 167.14 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/09/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT 172 WHEEL BOLT 603-5500-600.256.000 14.49 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/11/2025 ISAAC'S AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR RT 159 REPAIR A/C 603-5500-600.400.000 103.45 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/12/2025 THE OUTDOORSMAN RT 159 CAT INSPECTION 603-5500-600.400.000 220.00 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/12/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT 168 COOLANT SENSOR 603-5500-600.256.000 12.78 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/12/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT ARBOC FLEET BRAKE PAD STOCK 603-5500-600.256.000 189.99 US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions Page 3 of 8
192
EMPLOYEE NAME TRANSACTION DATE VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PURCHASE ACCOUNT # AMOUNT City of Selma
US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions
Period: 08/23/2025 - 09/22/2025
KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/12/2025 ACE HARDWARE RT SHOP LOCK BOX 603-5500-600.250.000 54.23 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/12/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT SHOP SUPPLIES 603-5500-600.250.000 139.59 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/13/2025 CUMMINS, INC. CUMMINS INSIGHT SUBSCRIPTION 603-5500-600.400.000 840.00 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/13/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS RT 192 OIL FILTER 603-5500-600.256.000 52.01 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/13/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT 192 WATER FILTER/ RT EL D'S OIL FILTER 603-5500-600.256.000 57.97 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/14/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS RT SHOP SUPPLIES 603-5500-600.250.000 58.41 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/15/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT 155/STOCK OIL PAN GASKET 603-5500-600.256.000 234.74 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/15/2025 THERMO KING RT 182 REPAIR A/C REAR 603-5500-600.256.000 462.88 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/15/2025 AMAZON RT EL DORADO FLEET VOLTAGE REGULATORS 603-5500-600.256.000 1,346.12 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/16/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS RT ARBOC WIPER BLADES 12 UNITS 603-5500-600.256.000 42.83 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/16/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT SHOP EARTH OIL ABSORBANT 603-5500-600.250.000 166.95 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/17/2025 AFFINITY TRUCK CENTER RT 169 REPAIR PINION LEAK 603-5500-600.400.000 416.23 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/17/2025 AMAZON RT PRESSURE WASHER HOSE/RT SHOP PUMP 603-5500-600.250.000 122.00 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/17/2025 AMAZON RT SHOP SUPPLIES OIL DRIP PAN 603-5500-600.250.000 75.92 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/18/2025 AFFINITY TRUCK CENTER RT 194 ROAD CALL SERVICE BATTERY 2X 603-5500-600.400.000 193.97 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/18/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT 194 STARTER BATTERY NEW 2X 603-5500-600.256.000 655.70 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/18/2025 AMAZON RT ARBOC FLEET HEAD LAMP ASSEMBLY STK 603-5500-600.256.000 522.03 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/19/2025 LAST MINUTE AUTO REPAIR RT 159 REPAIR A/C HOSE REAR RR 603-5500-600.400.000 386.63 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/19/2025 LAST MINUTE AUTO REPAIR RT 159 REPAIR CLARENCE LIGHT REPAIR 603-5500-600.400.000 226.28 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/19/2025 WALMART RT SHOP SUPPLIES 603-5500-600.250.000 12.28 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/20/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS RT ARBOC AIR FILTER STOCK INVENTORY 20X 603-5500-600.256.000 343.43 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/20/2025 NAPA AUTO PARTS RT ARBOC STOCK INVENTORY STOCK 5X 603-5500-600.256.000 468.40 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/20/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS RT SHOP BRAKECLN SUPPLIES 603-5500-600.256.000 90.86 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU 09/20/2025 ACE HARDWARE RT SHOP SUPPLIES 603-5500-600.250.000 239.14 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/05/2025 VISTAPRINT PROMOTIONAL ITEMS 100-4100-600.211.000 363.92 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/05/2025 AMAZON PUMPKIN PALOOZA PARTY FAVORS 100-4100-656.905.000 44.42 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/08/2025 SMART & FINAL BREAKFAST AND SNACK BAR ITEMS 100-4500-656.895.000 314.17 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/08/2025 AMAZON COFFEE MUG CLEANING SUPPLIES 100-4200-600.250.000 173.19 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/08/2025 SMART & FINAL PUMPKIN PALOOZA CANDY 100-4100-656.905.000 471.64 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/08/2025 AMAZON STORAGE DISPLAY SHELF 100-4100-600.100.000 43.27 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/09/2025 LS CLAY MIX, LLC CERAMICS SLIP 100-4200-656.900.001 89.12 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/09/2025 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-4100-600.100.000 82.32 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/10/2025 AMAZON POOL ROOM SUPPLIES 100-4200-600.250.000 21.68 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/11/2025 AMAZON AIRWICK 100-4200-600.250.000 16.26 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/12/2025 DOLLAR TREE HALLOWEEN DECORATIONS 100-4200-656.900.001 37.62 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/12/2025 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-4100-600.100.000 90.29 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/18/2025 SIERRA MARKET SENIOR CENTER BREAD 100-4500-656.895.000 25.95 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/19/2025 AMAZON ANIMAL SHELTER RESTRICTED AREA SIGN 100-2400-600.250.050 8.78 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/19/2025 WALMART BREAKFAST ITEMS AND SNACKS 100-4500-656.895.000 131.74 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/19/2025 DOLLAR TREE HALLOWEEN DECORATIONS 100-4200-656.900.001 16.27 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/19/2025 AMAZON MOJADA COSTUMES AND PROPS 605-4300-656.910.000 87.50 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/19/2025 AMAZON MOJADA COSTUMES AND PROPS 605-4300-656.910.000 76.84 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/22/2025 AMAZON HALLOWEEN DECORATIONS 100-4200-656.900.001 29.25 LISBETH FLETCHER 09/22/2025 CUSTOMLANYARD.NET SAC MARKETING 605-4300-600.250.000 254.99 LISBETH MARTINEZ 08/25/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 215.64 LISBETH MARTINEZ 08/25/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 64.74 LISBETH MARTINEZ 08/25/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 172.64 LISBETH MARTINEZ 08/25/2025 KNOTTY CHIX LUNCH FOR LUAU EVENT 100-4500-656.895.000 520.00 US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions Page 4 of 8
203
EMPLOYEE NAME TRANSACTION DATE VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PURCHASE ACCOUNT # AMOUNT City of Selma
US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions
Period: 08/23/2025 - 09/22/2025
LISBETH MARTINEZ 09/19/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES REFUND 100-4300-600.250.000 (21.58) LISBETH MARTINEZ 09/19/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES REFUND 100-4300-600.250.000 (21.68) MICHAEL HONN 08/21/2025 HAROLD'S CHICKEN APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-MEAL 210-5400-610.920.000 21.99 MICHAEL HONN 08/21/2025 MCCORMICK PLACE APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-MEAL 210-5400-610.920.000 28.72 MICHAEL HONN 08/21/2025 MCCORMICK PLACE APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-MEAL 100-5300-610.920.000 28.71 MICHAEL HONN 08/22/2025 FATPOUR APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-MEAL 210-5400-610.920.000 57.06 MICHAEL HONN 08/22/2025 FATPOUR APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-MEAL 100-5300-610.920.000 57.07 MICHAEL HONN 08/23/2025 CHICAGO WAFFLES APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-MEAL 210-5400-610.920.000 20.38 MICHAEL HONN 08/23/2025 CHICAGO WAFFLES APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-MEAL 100-5300-610.920.000 20.38 MICHAEL HONN 08/23/2025 ROOT DOWN DIA APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-MEAL 210-5400-610.920.000 29.59 MICHAEL HONN 08/23/2025 ROOT DOWN DIA APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-MEAL 100-5300-610.920.000 29.60 MICHAEL HONN 08/23/2025 FRESNO YOSEMITE AIRPORT APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-PARKING 210-5400-610.920.000 68.00 MICHAEL HONN 08/23/2025 FRESNO YOSEMITE AIRPORT APWX CONFERENCE CHICAGO-PARKING 100-5300-610.920.000 68.00 NESTOR GALVAN 08/26/2025 UNITY MANUFACTURING 6" LED CLEAR SPOT LAMPS-PD INTERCEPTORS 701-9200-600.256.000 1,173.32 NESTOR GALVAN 08/26/2025 TIFCO INDUSTRIES WASHERS, BUTANE REFILL 701-9200-600.250.000 120.60 NESTOR GALVAN 08/27/2025 ARMANDO'S SMOG SMOG UNIT #228 701-9200-600.400.000 60.00 NESTOR GALVAN 08/29/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS FAN BLADE-UNIT #171 701-9200-600.256.000 (85.78) NESTOR GALVAN 08/29/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS FAN BLADE-UNIT #171 701-9200-600.256.000 85.78 NESTOR GALVAN 08/29/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS KNOCK SENSORS-UNIT #175/STOCK 701-9200-600.256.000 (57.54) NESTOR GALVAN 08/29/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS KNOCK SENSORS-UNIT #175/STOCK 701-9200-600.256.000 57.54 NESTOR GALVAN 09/03/2025 CTC 2025 CARB COMPLIANCE FEES 701-9200-600.400.000 128.45 NESTOR GALVAN 09/03/2025 ASE APP SUBSCRIPTION 701-9200-600.400.000 48.00 NESTOR GALVAN 09/03/2025 ALLSTARSMOG & DMV SERVICES CREDIT CARD SERVICE FEE 701-9200-600.400.000 5.00 NESTOR GALVAN 09/03/2025 ALLSTARSMOG & DMV SERVICES SMOG UNIT #1208 701-9200-600.400.000 200.00 NESTOR GALVAN 09/03/2025 ALLSTARSMOG & DMV SERVICES SMOG UNIT #1209 701-9200-600.400.000 200.00 NESTOR GALVAN 09/03/2025 ALLSTARSMOG & DMV SERVICES SMOG UNIT #1315 701-9200-600.400.000 150.00 NESTOR GALVAN 09/03/2025 ALLSTARSMOG & DMV SERVICES SMOG UNIT #2600 701-9200-600.400.000 200.00 NESTOR GALVAN 09/03/2025 TIFCO INDUSTRIES WASHERS, SCREWS, ELEC TERMINALS-STOCK 701-9200-600.250.000 369.90 NESTOR GALVAN 09/10/2025 TIFCO INDUSTRIES CARGO STRAPS, SCREWS, WASHERS-STOCK 701-9200-600.250.000 102.80 NESTOR GALVAN 09/17/2025 TIFCO INDUSTRIES RATCHET CARGO STRAPS 701-9200-600.250.000 520.46 NESTOR GALVAN 09/18/2025 TIFCO INDUSTRIES DISPOSABLE GLOVES, ELECTRICAL TAPE 701-9200-600.250.000 70.66 NESTOR GALVAN 09/18/2025 THE HOME DEPOT TREE STRAP, FLAT LIFT SLING - DOWNTOWN TREE PROJECT 100-5400.700.100.000 33.74 NESTOR GALVAN 09/18/2025 VEVOR UNDERBODY TRUCK BOX 701-9200-600.250.000 73.75 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/25/2025 WALMART HADESTOWN SNACK BAR ITEMS 605-4300-656.910.000 99.39 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/25/2025 WALGREENS HADESTOWN WATERS 605-4300-656.910.000 10.98 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/26/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 81.31 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/26/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 34.68 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/26/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 45.52 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/27/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 22.66 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/27/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 22.66 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/27/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 30.35 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/27/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR PROPS AND SET SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 155.25 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/28/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 19.50 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/28/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 78.03 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/28/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 65.04 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/28/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 99.15 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/28/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES AND SET SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 136.52 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/28/2025 PRINT SHACK FINDING NEMO JR POSTERS 100-4300-600.250.000 141.73 US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions Page 5 of 8
213
EMPLOYEE NAME TRANSACTION DATE VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PURCHASE ACCOUNT # AMOUNT City of Selma
US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions
Period: 08/23/2025 - 09/22/2025
NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 08/29/2025 WALMART HADESTOWN SNACK BAR ITEMS 605-4300-656.910.000 243.01 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUME AND SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 347.84 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 19.50 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 81.19 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 90.32 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 64.92 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 21.66 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 32.53 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 148.52 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 195.85 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR SET SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 117.12 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/01/2025 WALGREENS HADESTOWN SNACK BAR ITEMS 605-4300-656.910.000 25.04 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/02/2025 THE HOME DEPOT FINDING NEMO JR SET SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 287.60 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/02/2025 THE HOME DEPOT FINDING NEMO JR SET SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 175.01 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/02/2025 ME-N-EDS PIZZERIA HADESTOWN CAST PARTY 605-4300-656.910.000 140.21 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/03/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR LOBBY AND SNACKBAR ITEMS 100-4300-600.250.000 34.68 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/04/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR LOBBY DÉCOR 100-4300-600.250.000 18.31 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/04/2025 THE HOME DEPOT FINDING NEMO JR SET SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 35.82 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/04/2025 WALGREENS FINDING NEMO JR SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 52.81 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/05/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 84.48 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/05/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 47.04 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/05/2025 MADMAPPER FINDING NEMO JR PROJECTION MAPPER LICENSE 100-4300-600.400.000 53.10 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/05/2025 THE HOME DEPOT FINDING NEMO JR SET SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 5.38 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/05/2025 CONCORD THEATRICALS CORP. PERFORMANCE RIGHTS FOR GREASE 605-4300-656.910.000 1,579.29 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/05/2025 SIGNUPGENIUS SAC AUDITION PLATFORM SIGNUP 605-4300-656.910.000 29.99 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/08/2025 WALMART FINDING NEMO JR GLOVES AND MIC TAP 100-4300-600.250.000 48.63 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/08/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR LOBBY ITEMS 100-4300-600.250.000 54.20 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/08/2025 WALGREENS FINDING NEMO JR SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 25.75 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/09/2025 AMAZON MOJADA COSTUMES 605-4300-656.910.000 20.60 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/10/2025 AMAZON PRIME CITY - PRIME MEMBERSHIP 100-4100-610.900.000 16.26 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/10/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 41.21 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/10/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR LOBBY SUPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 24.82 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/10/2025 AMAZON MOJADA COSTUMES 605-4300-656.910.000 34.70 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/10/2025 AMAZON MOJADA COSTUMES 605-4300-656.910.000 103.10 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/10/2025 CRATE & BARREL MOJADA SET AND PROP SUPPLIES 605-4300-656.910.000 133.77 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/11/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO JR COSTUMES 100-4300-600.250.000 79.09 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/11/2025 AMAZON MOJADA COSTUMES 605-4300-656.910.000 20.60 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/11/2025 AMAZON MOJADA COSTUMES AND PROPS 605-4300-656.910.000 189.77 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/11/2025 AMAZON MOJADA PROPS 605-4300-656.910.000 21.48 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/12/2025 WALMART FINDING NEMO JR SNACK BAR ITEMS 100-4300-600.250.000 108.39 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/12/2025 AMAZON MOJADA SET SUPPLIES 605-4300-656.910.000 300.45 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/15/2025 DOLLAR TREE FINDING NEMO JR CRAFT SUPPPLIES 100-4300-600.250.000 18.35 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/15/2025 WALGREENS FINDING NEMO JR GLOVES FOR MICS 100-4300-600.250.000 16.34 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/15/2025 SMART & FINAL FINDING NEMO JR SNACK BAR ITEMS 100-4300-600.250.000 329.99 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/16/2025 WALMART FINDING NEMO JR CAST PARTY SNACKS 100-4300-600.250.000 48.31 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/16/2025 DREAMHOST SAC WEB HOSTING 605-4300-656.910.000 5.00 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/17/2025 LITTLE CAESARS FINDING NEMO JR CAST PARTY 100-4300-600.250.000 217.79 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/17/2025 AMAZON MOJADA PROPS 605-4300-656.910.000 22.09 US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions Page 6 of 8
223
EMPLOYEE NAME TRANSACTION DATE VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PURCHASE ACCOUNT # AMOUNT City of Selma
US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions
Period: 08/23/2025 - 09/22/2025
NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/18/2025 PRINT SHACK MOJADA POSTERS AND POSTCARDS 605-4300-656.910.000 219.85 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/19/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO COSTUME AND SUPPLIES REFUND 100-4300-600.250.000 (110.13) NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/19/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO COSTUME AND SUPPLIES REFUND 100-4300-600.250.000 (29.27) NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/19/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO COSTUME AND SUPPLIES REFUND 100-4300-600.250.000 (10.83) NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/19/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO COSTUME AND SUPPLIES REFUND 100-4300-600.250.000 (18.43) NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/19/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO COSTUME AND SUPPLIES REFUND 100-4300-600.250.000 (6.50) NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/19/2025 AMAZON FINDING NEMO COSTUME AND SUPPLIES REFUND 100-4300-600.250.000 (9.75) NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/19/2025 AMAZON MOJADA SUPPLIES 605-4300-656.910.000 36.55 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/19/2025 AMAZON MOJADA SUPPLIES 605-4300-656.910.000 54.23 NICOLETTE ANDERSEN 09/19/2025 THE HOME DEPOT SAC MOJADA SET SUPPLIES 605-4300-656.910.000 201.50 PATRICK HERNANDEZ 09/08/2025 SPECTRUMVOIP, INC. PHONE SERVICE 704-9600-600.470.000 27.70 POLICE DEPT NO 1 08/27/2025 PRIMO BRANDS/WATERSERV CREDIT FROM PRIMO WATER 100-2100-600.400.000 (84.00) POLICE DEPT NO 1 09/02/2025 PETCO.COM DOG FOOD 100-2200-600.250.000 66.96 POLICE DEPT NO 1 09/02/2025 SHELL GAS STATION FUEL 701-9200-600.257.000 32.56 POLICE DEPT NO 1 09/02/2025 TOWN AND COUNTRY RESORT PARKING 100-2200-610.920.000 5.00 POLICE DEPT NO 1 09/05/2025 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS CONFERENCE STAY PARKING FEES 100-2200-610.920.000 72.00 POLICE DEPT NO 1 09/05/2025 ONTARIO STARS GAS STATION FUEL 701-9200-600.257.000 58.53 POLICE DEPT NO 2 08/22/2025 HOMES TO SUITES BY HILTON D.A.R.E TRAINING, POST REIMBURSABLE HOTEL 100-2200-610.915.000 797.35 POLICE DEPT NO 2 08/29/2025 HOMES TO SUITES BY HILTON D.A.R.E TRAINING, POST REIMBURSABLE HOTEL 100-2200-610.915.000 797.35 RENE GARZA 09/07/2025 AIRTABLE.COM SUBSCRIPTION SOFTWARE FOR DISPATCH 100-2100-600.470.000 151.54 RICHARD FIGUEROA 08/23/2025 THE HOME DEPOT EARPLUGS (RANGE TRAINING) 100-2200-600.250.000 10.81 RICHARD FIGUEROA 08/26/2025 ACE HARDWARE STENCILS (FLARE IDENT.) 100-2200-600.250.000 13.66 RICHARD FIGUEROA 09/20/2025 CENTRAL VALLEY GUNS QUAD RAIL PROTECTIVE COVER (RIFLES) 100-2200-600.250.000 40.10 RICHARD FIGUEROA 09/21/2025 AMAZON FIREARM OILS & CLEANING SOLUTIONS 100-2200-600.250.000 27.09 ROBYN LEWIS 09/06/2025 PITNEY BOWES, INC. INK FOR STAMP MACHINE 100-2100-600.250.000 117.02 ROBYN LEWIS 09/09/2025 AMAZON SERGEANT SUPPLIES 100-2200-600.250.000 33.96 ROBYN LEWIS 09/10/2025 AMAZON COMMANDER GARZA SUPPLIES 100-2200-600.250.000 17.69 ROBYN LEWIS 09/11/2025 FROMYOUFLOWERS ALCARAZ FAMILY CONDOLCENCE PLANT 100-2100-600.400.000 120.37 ROBYN LEWIS 09/15/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-2100-600.250.000 13.82 ROBYN LEWIS 09/16/2025 DELI DELICIOUS FTO LUNCH MEETING 100-2200-600.400.000 84.53 ROBYN LEWIS 09/16/2025 WALGREENS FTO LUNCH MEETING 100-2200-600.400.000 25.33 ROBYN LEWIS 09/16/2025 AMAZON SUPPLIES 100-2200-600.250.000 56.78 RUDOLFO ALCARAZ 08/27/2025 COSTCO WHOLESALE FENTANYL TOWN HALL MEETING SNACKS 100-2300-600.250.000 83.94 RUDOLFO ALCARAZ 09/03/2025 76 GAS STATION FUEL 701-9200-600.257.000 83.01 RUDOLFO ALCARAZ 09/05/2025 THE CLIFFS HOTEL FRESNO-MADERA POLICE CHIEF MEETING 100-2300-610.920.000 918.42 RUDOLFO ALCARAZ 09/11/2025 SURF THRU CAR WASH 100-2300-600.400.000 20.99 RUDOLFO ALCARAZ 09/17/2025 NEXT LEVEL STICKERS 100-2300-600.215.000 128.98 SAMANTHA SAUCEDA 08/28/2025 AMAZON EXTINGUISHER MOUNTS 100-2550-600.250.000 9.75 SAMANTHA SAUCEDA 09/06/2025 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-2500-600.100.000 21.68 SAMANTHA SAUCEDA 09/08/2025 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-2525-600.100.000 58.67 SAMANTHA SAUCEDA 09/10/2025 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-2525-600.100.000 43.36 SAMANTHA SAUCEDA 09/17/2025 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-2500-600.100.000 15.61 SAMANTHA SAUCEDA 09/18/2025 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-2525-600.100.000 39.04 SAMANTHA SAUCEDA 09/19/2025 FASTRAK VIOLATION CENTER LONG DISTANCE TRANSFER BRIDGE TOLL 600-2600-600.400.000 8.00 SAMANTHA SAUCEDA 09/19/2025 FASTRAK VIOLATION CENTER LONG DISTANCE TRANSFER BRIDGE TOLL 600-2600-600.400.000 8.00 SARA CARLSON 08/27/2025 ROSA'S PIZZA LUNCH ON 8/26 DURING CITY MANAGER INTERVIEWS PER CC REQUEST 100-1100-610.920.000 220.74 SARA CARLSON 09/02/2025 FRESNO COUNTY CLERK NORTH PARKING DRAIN CEQA NOE FILING - BASE AMOUNT 100-3100-600.210.000 50.00 SARA CARLSON 09/02/2025 FRESNO COUNTY CLERK NORTH PARKING DRAIN CEQA NOE FILING - SERVICE FEE 100-3100-600.210.000 1.15 US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions Page 7 of 8
233
EMPLOYEE NAME TRANSACTION DATE VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PURCHASE ACCOUNT # AMOUNT City of Selma
US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions
Period: 08/23/2025 - 09/22/2025
SARA CARLSON 09/03/2025 FRESNO COUNTY CLERK SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY CEQA NOE FILING - BASE AMOUNT 100-3100-600.210.000 50.00 SARA CARLSON 09/03/2025 FRESNO COUNTY CLERK SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY CEQA NOE FILING - SERVICE FEE 100-3100-600.210.000 1.15 SARA CARLSON 09/11/2025 USPS POLICE DEPT SUBPOENA FOR RECORDS- BARRY VS SUNSHINE INVESTMENTS 100-2200-600.120.000 26.01 SARA CARLSON 09/15/2025 WALMART CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUPPLIES 100-1100-600.250.000 286.34 TIM CANNON 08/29/2025 D-PREP DUI CHECKPOINT TRAINING, POST REIMBURSABLE 100-2200-610.915.000 318.00 TIM CANNON 08/29/2025 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INT & INT TRAINING, POST REIMBURSABLE 100-2200-610.915.000 1,150.00 TIM CANNON 09/09/2025 BLUE TO GOLD STORE PUBLIC SAFETY STATEMENT CARDS 100-2200-600.250.000 29.90 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 08/22/2025 KIMBALL MIDWEST CEMENT/PRIMER - PARKS 100-5300-600.250.000 47.08 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 08/22/2025 FULLSOURCE SAFETY GLASSES - BLDGS 702-9300-600.250.000 61.83 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 08/22/2025 FULLSOURCE SAFETY GLASSES - PARKS 100-5300-600.250.000 61.83 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 08/22/2025 FULLSOURCE SAFETY GLASSES - STREETS 210-5400-600.250.000 61.83 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 08/28/2025 MIRROR FINISH MIRROR FOR FORKLIFT 100-5300-600.250.000 13.56 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 08/28/2025 MIRROR FINISH MIRROR FOR FORKLIFT 210-5400-600.250.000 13.56 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 09/04/2025 BULBS.COM 1000W MEAL HALIDE BULBS 100-5300-600.250.000 437.45 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 09/09/2025 VULCAN COLD MIX 210-5400-600.250.000 607.01 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 09/17/2025 THE SELMA BARN CONCRETE - PICKLEBALL COURTS 100-5300-600.250.000 261.17 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 09/17/2025 ME-N-EDS PIZZERIA MEETING/TRAINING-PARKS 100-5300-610.920.000 48.54 ULYSSES MARAVILLA 09/17/2025 ME-N-EDS PIZZERIA MEETING/TRAINING-STRTEETS 210-5400-610.920.000 48.55 Total 354 105 75 64,343.17
US Bank Invoice for Cal-Card Transactions Page 8 of 8
243
2-2
Approval –
Consideration of Resolutions
2025-121R, 2025-5CEC, 2025-
3PFA and 2025-3SRDA
Approving Changes to Banking
Authorized Signers for City of
Selma, the Selma Successors
Agency, Selma Community
Enhancement Corporation, and
the Selma Public Financing
Authority
35 36
ITEM NO: 2-2

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: November 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolutions 2025-121R, 2025-5CEC, 2025-3PFA and 2025-3SRDA Approving Changes to Banking Authorized Signers for City of Selma, the Selma Successors Agency, Selma Community Enhancement Corporation, and the Selma Public Financing Authority
SUBMITTED: Margarita Moreno, Finance Director/Treasurer APPROVED: John Kunkel, Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Resolutions 2022-121R, 2025-5CEC, 2025-3PFA and 2025-3SRDA to Update Banking Authorized Signers for City of Selma, the Selma Successors Agency, Selma Community Enhancement Corporation, and the Selma Public Financing Authority.

DISCUSSION:

With the recent staffing changes, documents have been prepared naming the following as authorized signers on the various accounts at US Bank:

Jason Rogers – City Manager
Jerome Keene – Deputy City Manager
Margaret Fallert – Deputy City Manager
Margarita Moreno – Finance Director/Treasurer
Two (2) signatures are still required on each check.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No known fiscal impact.

Attachments:
☒ Resolutions 2025 - 121R
2025- 5CEC
2025- 3PFA
2025- 3SRDA
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☐ Other
List:
37 38
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 – 121R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SELMA
RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2025-28R AUTHORIZING

AND DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED PERSONS TO

ESTABLISH, DEPOSIT, AND WITHDRAW

FROM BANK ACCOUNTS AT US BANK
WHEREAS, the City of Selma should designate certain persons and authorized persons to deposit into City Accounts and to withdraw on behalf of the City from said account; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-28R designating said authorized persons and now wishes to revise said designations.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SELMA
HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds that the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council hereby rescinds Resolution No. 2025-28R, and any other City Council resolution that designated authorized banking signatories for the City of Selma Accounts.

Section 3. The City Council hereby affirms that that US Bank, a national banking association (“Bank”), is hereby selected and designated as a depositary of funds of the City, and that accounts are established and maintained by and in the name of the City at the Selma office of said Bank, upon and subject to such terms and conditions as the officers hereinafter designated, or any of them, may from time to time agree upon with said Bank.

Section 4. The City Council hereby designates that all checks, drafts and other instruments for the payment of money drawn or accepted by the City for payment from said account or at said office be signed on behalf of the City by any two (2) of the following officers of the City viz:

Scott Robertson as Mayor, Sarah Guerra as Mayor Pro Tem, Jerome Keene Deputy City Manager, Jason Rogers as City Manager, Margaret Fallert Deputy City Manager and/or Margarita Moreno as Finance Director/Treasurer.

Section 5. Effective until November 21, 2025, the City Council designates Jerome Keene as the assigned signatory for all checks, drafts, and other instruments issued by the City for payment from said account or office.

Section 6. Effective December 1, 2025, the City Council designates Margaret Fallert as the assigned signatory for all checks, drafts, and other instruments issued by the City for payment from said account or office.

Section 7. The City Council hereby designates that any checks, drafts or other instruments for the payment of money, endorsed on behalf of this city for deposit with or collection by said Bank, may be so endorsed in the name of the City by written or stamped endorsement, without designation or signature of the person making such endorsement; and 39 Section 8. The City Council hereby directs that the City Clerk certify to said Bank that the Resolution has been duly adopted, and is in conformity with the by-laws of the City, and to further certify to said Bank that names and specimen signatures of the present officers of the City authorized to sign as aforesaid, and if and when any change be made in the personnel of said officers the fact of such change and the name and specimen signature of each new officer.

Section 9. The City Council hereby requests and authorizes the Bank to honor, receive, certify, and pay any such instrument signed or endorsed in accordance with the foregoing resolution and the certification then in effect as above provided for, including any such instrument drawn or endorsed to the personal order of, or presented for negotiation or encashment by, any officer signing or endorsing the name.

Section 10. The City Council hereby finds and declares that this Resolution and each such certification shall remain in full force and effect, and said Bank is authorized and requested to reply and act thereon, until it shall receive at its office to which the certified copy of this Resolution is delivered, either a certified copy of a further resolution of the City of Selma amending or rescinding these resolutions or a further certification as above provided for, as the case may be.

Section 11. Severability. The provisions of this Resolution are severable and if any provision, clause, sentence, word or part thereof is held illegal, invalid, unconstitutional, or inapplicable to any person or circumstances, such illegality, invalidity, unconstitutionality, or inapplicability shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, clauses, sentences, sections, words or parts thereof of the Resolution or their applicability to other persons or circumstances.

Section 12. Effective Date. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and that the same shall be in full force and effect.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
ATTEST: Scott Robertson
Mayor
______________________________
Sara M. Carlson
City Clerk
40 RESOLUTION NO. 2025 – 5CEC

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

THE SELMA COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION
RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2025-4CEC, AND AUTHORIZING AND

DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED PERSONS TO ESTABLISH AND WITHDRAW

FROM BANK ACCOUNTS AT US BANK
WHEREAS, the Selma Community Enhancement Corporation (“Corporation”)should designate certain persons and authorized persons to deposit in Corporation accounts and to withdraw on behalf of the Corporation from said accounts; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the Corporation adopted Resolution No. 2025-4CEC designating said authorized persons and now wishes to revise said designations.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
CORPORATION HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The Corporation hereby rescinds Resolution No. 2025-4CEC, and any other Corporation resolution that designated authorized banking signatories for the Corporation account.

Section 3. The Corporation hereby affirms that US Bank, a national banking association (“Bank”), is hereby selected and designated as a depositary of funds of this Corporation, and that accounts be established and maintained by and in the name of this Corporation at the Selma office of said Bank, upon and subject to such terms and conditions as the officers hereinafter designated, or any of them, may from time to time agree upon with said Bank.

Section 4. The Corporation hereby designates that all checks, drafts and other instruments for the payment of money drawn or accepted by the Corporation for payment from said account or at said office be signed on behalf of the Corporation by any two (2) of the following officers of the Corporation viz: Scott Robertson as Mayor, Sarah Guerra as Mayor Pro Tem, Jerome Keene Deputy City Manager, Jason Rogers as City Manager Margaret Fallert as Deputy City Manager and/or Margarita Moreno as Finance Director/Treasurer.

Section 7. The Corporation Board hereby designates that any checks, drafts or other instruments for the payment of money, endorsed on behalf of the Corporation for deposit with or collection by said Bank, may be so endorsed in the name of the Corporation by written or stamped endorsement, without designation or signature of the person making such endorsement. 41 Section 8. The Corporation Board hereby directs that the Secretary certify to said Bank that this Resolution has been duly adopted, and is in conformity with the by-laws of the Corporation, and to further certify to said Bank that names and specimen signatures of the present officers of the Corporation authorized to sign as aforesaid, and if and when any change be made in the personnel of said officers the fact of such change and the name and specimen signature of each new officer.

Section 9. The Corporation Board hereby requests and authorizes the Bank to honor, receive, certify, and pay any such instruments signed or endorsed in accordance with the foregoing Resolution and the certification then in effect as above provided for, including any such instrument drawn or endorsed to the personal order of, or presented for negotiation or encashment by, any officer signing or endorsing the name.

Section 10. The Corporation Board hereby finds and declares that this Resolution and each such certification shall remain in full force and effect, and said Bank is authorized and requested to reply and act thereon, until it shall receive at its office to which the certified copy of these resolutions is delivered, either a certified copy of a further resolution of the Selma Enhancement Corporation amending or rescinding these resolutions or a further certification as above provided for, as the case may be.

Section 12. Effective Date. That the Corporation Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and that the same shall be in full force and effect.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
ATTEST: Scott Robertson
Chairperson
______________________________
Sara M. Carlson
Corporation Secretary
42 RESOLUTION NO. 2025 –3PFA

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

THE SELMA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-2PFA, AND AUTHORIZING AND DESIGNATING

AUTHORIZED PERSONS TO ESTABLISH AND WITHDRAW

FROM BANK ACCOUNTS AT US BANK
WHEREAS, the Selma Public Financing Authority (“Authority”) should designate certain persons and authorized persons to deposit in Authority accounts and to withdraw on behalf of the Authority from said accounts; and
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the Authority adopted Resolution No. 2025-2PFA designating said authorized persons and now wishes to revise said designations.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE SELMA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The Authority hereby rescinds Resolution No. 2025-2PFA, and any other resolution that designated authorized banking signatories for the Authority account.

Section 3. The Authority hereby affirms that US Bank, a national banking association (“Bank”), is hereby selected and designated as a depositary of funds of this Authority, and that accounts be established and maintained by and in the name of this Authority at the Selma office of said Bank, upon and subject to such terms and conditions as the officers hereinafter designated, or any of them, may from time to time agree upon with said Bank.

Section 4. The Authority hereby designates that all checks, drafts and other instruments for the payment of money drawn or accepted by the Authority for payment from said account or at said office be signed on behalf of the Authority by any two (2) of the following officers of the Authority viz: Scott Robertson as Mayor, Sarah Guerra as Mayor Pro Tem, Jerome Keene Deputy City Manager, Jason Rogers as City Manager Margaret Fallert as Deputy City Manager and/or Margarita Moreno as Finance Director/Treasurer.

Section 7. The Authority Board hereby designates that any checks, drafts or other instruments for the payment of money, endorsed on behalf of the Authority for deposit with or collection by said Bank, may be so endorsed in the name of the Authority by written or stamped endorsement, without designation or signature of the person making such endorsement. 43 Section 8. The Authority Board hereby directs that the Secretary certify to said Bank that this Resolution has been duly adopted, and is in conformity with the by-laws of the Authority, and to further certify to said Bank that names and specimen signatures of the present officers of the Authority authorized to sign as aforesaid, and if and when any change be made in the personnel of said officers the fact of such change and the name and specimen signature of each new officer.

Section 9. The Authority Board hereby requests and authorizes the Bank to honor, receive, certify, and pay any such instruments signed or endorsed in accordance with the foregoing Resolution and the certification then in effect as above provided for, including any such instrument drawn or endorsed to the personal order of, or presented for negotiation or encashment by, any officer signing or endorsing the name.

Section 10. The Authority Board hereby finds and declares that this Resolution and each such certification shall remain in full force and effect, and said Bank is authorized and requested to reply and act thereon, until it shall receive at its office to which the certified copy of these resolutions is delivered, either a certified copy of a further resolution of the Selma Enhancement Authority amending or rescinding these resolutions or a further certification as above provided for, as the case may be.

Section 11. Effective Date. That the Authority Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this 1Resolution and that the same shall be in full force and effect.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
ATTEST: Scott Robertson
Chairperson
______________________________
Sara M. Carlson
Authority Secretary
44 RESOLUTION NO. 2025 – 3SRDA

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

THE SELMA SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESCINDING RESOLUTION
NO. 2025-2SRDA, AND AUTHORIZING AND DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED

PERSONS TO ESTABLISH AND WITHDRAW FROM BANK ACCOUNTS AT US BANK – SUCCESSOR RDA
WHEREAS, the Selma Successor Agency (“Agency”) should designate certain persons and authorized persons to deposit in Agency accounts and to withdraw on behalf of the Agency from said accounts; and
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the Agency adopted Resolution No. 2025-2SRDA designating said authorized persons and now wishes to revise said designations.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY DOES HEREBY
FINDS, DETERMINES AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The Agency hereby rescinds Resolution No. 2025-2SRDA, and any other Agency resolution that designated authorized banking signatories for the Agency account.

Section 3. The Agency hereby affirms that US Bank, a national banking association (“Bank”), is hereby selected and designated as a depositary of funds of this Agency, and that accounts be established and maintained by and in the name of this Agency at the Selma office of said Bank, upon and subject to such terms and conditions as the officers hereinafter designated, or any of them, may from time to time agree upon with said Bank.

Section 4. The Agency hereby designates that all checks, drafts and other instruments for the payment of money drawn or accepted by the Agency for payment from said account or at said office be signed on behalf of the Agency by any two (2) of the following officers of the Agency viz: Scott Robertson as Mayor, Sarah Guerra as Mayor Pro Tem, Jerome Keene Deputy City Manager, Jason Rogers as City Manager Margaret Fallert as Deputy City Manager and/or Margarita Moreno as Finance Director/Treasurer.

Section 7. The Agency Board hereby designates that any checks, drafts or other instruments for the payment of money, endorsed on behalf of the Agency for deposit with or collection by said Bank, may be so endorsed in the name of the Agency by written or stamped endorsement, without designation or signature of the person making such endorsement. 45 Section 8. The Agency Board hereby directs that the Secretary certify to said Bank that this Resolution has been duly adopted, and is in conformity with the by-laws of the Agency, and to further certify to said Bank that names and specimen signatures of the present officers of the Agency authorized to sign as aforesaid, and if and when any change be made in the personnel of said officers the fact of such change and the name and specimen signature of each new officer.

Section 9. The Agency Board hereby requests and authorizes the Bank to honor, receive, certify, and pay any such instruments signed or endorsed in accordance with the foregoing Resolution and the certification then in effect as above provided for, including any such instrument drawn or endorsed to the personal order of, or presented for negotiation or encashment by, any officer signing or endorsing the name.

Section 10. The Agency Board hereby finds and declares that this Resolution and each such certification shall remain in full force and effect, and said Bank is authorized and requested to reply and act thereon, until it shall receive at its office to which the certified copy of these resolutions is delivered, either a certified copy of a further resolution of the Selma Successor Agency amending or rescinding these resolutions or a further certification as above provided for, as the case may be.

Section 12. Effective Date. That the Agency Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and that the same shall be in full force and effect.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
ATTEST: Scott Robertson
Chairperson
______________________________
Sara M. Carlson
Agency Secretary
46 2-3
Approval –
Consideration of Resolutions
2025-118R
Approving Changes to Banking
Authorized Signers for
City of Selma Monies in the Local
Agency Investment Fund –
City LAIF Account
47 48
ITEM NO: 2-3

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: November 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolutions 2025-118R Approving Changes to Banking Authorized Signers for City of Selma Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund – CITY LAIF Account
SUBMITTED: Margarita Moreno, Finance Director/Treasurer APPROVED: John Kunkel, Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Resolutions 2025-118R authorizing signers on the City of Selma’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Account.

DISCUSSION:

With changes in personnel, individuals authorizing the deposit and withdrawal of funds need to be changed.

Documents have been prepared naming the positions by title. The following positions have been identified as authorized signers on the City of Selma’s LAIF Account:

City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Finance Director/Treasurer
FISCAL IMPACT:

No known fiscal impact.

Attachments:
☒ Resolutions 2025 – 118R
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☐ Other
List:
49 50
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 – 118R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SELMA

AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF CITY OF SELMA MONIES
IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND – CITY LAIF
WHEREAS, The Local Agency Investment Fund is established in the State Treasury under Government Code section 16429.1 et. seq. for the deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Selma hereby finds that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Investment Fund in accordance with Government Code section 16429.1 et. seq. for the purpose of investment as provided therein is in the best interests of the City of Selma;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Selma hereby authorizes the deposit and withdrawal of City of Selma monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with Government Code section 16429.1 et. seq. for the purpose of investment as provided therein.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following City of Selma officers holding the title(s) specified herein below or their successors in office are each hereby authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund and may execute and deliver any and all documents necessary or advisable in order to effectuate the purposes of this resolution and the transactions contemplated hereby:

Jason Rogers – City Manager
Jerome Keene – Deputy City Manager
Margaret Fallert – Deputy City Manager
Margarita Moreno – Finance Director/Treasurer
Section 1. This resolution shall remain in full force and effect until rescinded by City Council of the City of Selma by resolution and a copy of the resolution rescinding this resolution is filed with the State Treasurer’s Office.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
ATTEST: Scott Robertson
Mayor
______________________________
Sara M. Carlson
City Clerk
51 52
2-4
Approval –
Consideration of Resolution
2025-119R
Approving Final Tract Map for
Tract 6244, Subdivision
Agreement, and Notice of
Intention to Annex Property to
Community Services District
2006-01, Zone B
53 54
ITEM NO: 2-4

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: November 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2025-119R approving Final Tract Map for Tract 6244, Subdivision Agreement, and Notice of Intention to Annex Property to Community Services District 2006-01, Zone B SUBMITTED: Jerome Keene, Deputy City Manager
APPROVED: John Kunkel, Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-119R approving the Final Tract Map, Subdivision Agreement for Tract 6244, and provide notice of intention to annex property to Community Facilities District 2006-01, Zone B (Tract 6244).

DISCUSSION:

Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 6244 was approved by the City Council on June 21, 2021, via Resolution 2021-21R; consisting of the development of a single-family residential subdivision on 55.1 acres of land within the Amberwood Specific Plan, located east of the intersection of Dockery Avenue and Floral Avenue. Currently, the developer, Lennar Home, has submitted a request for Council to approve (1) the Final Map of Tract 6244, (2) the associated Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and (3) issue a notice of the intention to annex the final tract map to Community Facilities District 2006-01, Zone B (Tract 6244).

In accordance with Selma Municipal Code 9-6-13, the City Engineer has reviewed the submitted Final Map for conformance to boundaries, public easement locations, dedications, closure calculations, and other required information. The City Engineer has consequently found the map to be in substantial compliance with the tentative map approval, has determined that the improvements required have been properly identified, and submits said map to the Council for their approval consideration.

Regarding the completion of public improvements associated with Tract Map 6244, the developer has requested to enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the development with the City of Selma, as authorized by Section 9-6-11 of the Selma Municipal Code. This action will allow for the filing of a final map for the development with the assurance that outstanding site improvements and activities identified within the project's conditions of approval will be completed within a given timeframe acceptable to the City. All outstanding improvement activities shall be secured by a surety bond and other specifications, as contained within the agreement and any consequent addendum. Council may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove of the agreement.

Lastly, the applicant is required to annex to a Community Facilities District (CFD) for financing services associated with the proposed development. Annexation to CFD 2006-01 and creation of a zone of benefit (Zone B) for the project would allow for an assessment to be charged to future residents to fund maintenance of associated amenities such as police, fire, landscaping, streetlighting, parks (on and off-site), streets (on and off-site), and storm drainage (on and off-site). Water and sewer assessments will not be levied as capital improvement 55 projects are funded by utility rates billed by other agencies. The proposed assessment for the subdivision is as follows:

Service Cost per Lot Annual Total
Admin Costs* $25.24 $7,495.56
Community Park Facilities $7.16 $2,127.20
Fire $381.98 $113,448.90
Landscaping $83.50 $24,798.76
Park Maintenance $111.44 $33,099.01
Police $400.82 $119,042.06
Road Maintenance (off site) $66.10 $19,630.47
Road Maintenance (on site) $308.87 $91,735.20
Storm Drain (on-site) $15.63 $4,642.11
Storm Drain (off-site) $2.01 $596.47
Streetlight $7.74 $2,297.33
Total Assessment $1,410.48 $418,913.08
Similar assessments will be required for future phases of the Amberwood Specific Plan development area to reduce reliance on service and maintenance from the General Fund and earmarked allocation funds.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Annexation to the CFD would allow for the fair share contribution of revenue to support the services and ongoing maintenance of the infrastructure for the proposed project without support from the General Fund. Furthermore, the development of the project would generate both property tax and sales tax, which would increase revenues to the General Fund.

Attachments:
☒ Resolution 2025-119R
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☒ Other
List: 1. Final Map for Tract 6244

2. Conditions of Approval

3. Final EIR and Mitigation Measures

4. Cost Estimates, Warrant, Security, and Impact Fees

5. Rate of Apportionment (CFD 2006-01, Zone B)
56 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-119R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SELMA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR TRACT 6244, SUBDIVISION

AGREEMENT, AND DECLARING INTENTION TO ANNEX PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-01, AND ESTABLISHING ZONE B WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6244 was approved by the Selma City Council on June 21, 2021, by Resolution No. 2021-21R; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has requested approval of the Final Map for Tract No. 6244 and execution of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement in accordance with Selma Municipal Code Chapter 9‑6 and the Subdivision Map Act, and the City Engineer has certified conformance for approval pursuant to Government Code §66458; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to initiate proceedings to annex the territory comprising Tract No. 6244 into Community Facilities District No. 2006‑01 for authorized City services and to establish Zone B within CFD No. 2006‑01 to identify services and the special tax rate and method applicable to such territory; and WHEREAS, the Mello‑Roos Community Facilities Act authorizes the City Council to adopt a resolution of intention, set a public hearing not less than 30 days thereafter, provide notice, conduct a landowner election for uninhabited territory, and, upon two‑thirds voter approval, levy the special tax by ordinance and record the notice of special tax lien.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Selma as follows:

Section 1: Final Map Approval; Acceptance of Dedications.

That certain Final Map of Tract No. 6244 (Exhibit A), having been certified by the City Engineer that all applicable provisions of law and Title 9, Chapter 6 of the Selma Municipal Code have been complied with and that the subdivision is substantially the same as the approved tentative map, is hereby approved pursuant to Government Code §66458, and the offers of dedication shown thereon are accepted subject to installation of improvements as conditioned herein.

Section 2: Improvement Plans.

Those certain improvement plans approved by the City Engineer entitled for Tract No. 6244 in Selma, California,” on file in the office of the City Engineer, are approved and adopted as the plans according to which the required improvements shall be constructed.

Section 3: Subdivision Improvement Agreement.

The Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract No. 6244 (Exhibit B), on file in the office of the City Engineer, is approved, and the City Manager and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute the agreement and to obtain and accept the required securities prior to recordation.
57 Section 3: Execution and Recordation.

The City Clerk is directed to execute the Final Map and, upon satisfaction of conditions herein, transmit the Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for recordation with the Fresno County Recorder in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, including Government Code §66466.

Section 4: Declaration of Intention to Annex to CFD No. 2006‑01 and Establish Zone B.

The City Council hereby declares its intention to annex the territory comprising Tract No. 6244 (the “Annexation Territory”) to Community Facilities District No. 2006‑01 (City of Selma Services) and to establish “Zone B” within CFD No. 2006‑01 consisting of the Annexation Territory for purposes of identifying the services to be financed and the special tax to be levied within Zone B.

Section 5: Description of Authorized Services.

The services to be financed by CFD No. 2006‑01 for Zone B shall be the authorized services for CFD No. 2006‑01 as described in the draft Rate and Method of Apportionment for Zone B (Exhibit C) and related documents on file with the City Clerk, which services are in addition to those provided in the territory before annexation and do not supplant existing services.

Section 6: Special Tax; Rate and Method of Apportionment.

The special tax to be levied within Zone B will be determined and apportioned in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment for Zone B (the “RMA”), which is hereby approved in preliminary form and placed on file with the City Clerk, and the Council states its intention to levy the special tax within Zone B upon successful voter approval as required by the Mello‑Roos Act.

Section 7: Boundary Map.

The City Engineer is directed to prepare and file with the City Clerk a boundary map depicting the Annexation Territory and Zone B boundaries in sufficient detail for annexation proceedings, which shall be available for public inspection prior to the public hearing stated herein.

Section 8: Public Hearing.

A public hearing on the proposed annexation of the Annexation Territory to CFD No. 2006‑01 and establishment of Zone B is set for Tuesday. January 6, 2026, at 6:00pm, at 1710 Tucker Street, Selma, CA 93662, which date is at least 30 days after adoption of this Resolution, at which time the City Council will consider testimony, protests, and all other matters relating thereto and may modify the proposals as permitted by law.

Section 9: Notice of Hearing.

The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the public hearing by publishing and providing any required mailed notices in the manner and time required by the Mello‑Roos Act for annexation proceedings and zone establishment.
58 Section 10: Landowner Election.

If, at the time of the public hearing, the Annexation Territory is uninhabited as defined by law, following the conclusion of the hearing the City Clerk is directed to conduct a landowner election on the questions of annexation to CFD No. 2006‑01, establishment of Zone B, the levy of the special tax within Zone B, and the establishment of the appropriations limit, and to canvass the results as provided by the Mello‑Roos Act.

Section 11: Levy by Ordinance; Lien Recordation.

If two‑thirds of the votes cast at the election approve the measures, the special tax for Zone B shall be levied by ordinance pursuant to Government Code §53340, and a Notice of Special Tax Lien shall be recorded against parcels in the Annexation Territory in accordance with the Mello‑Roos Act.

Section 12: Effective Date.

This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Selma held on the 18th day of November 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Scott Robertson
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Sara M. Carlson
City Clerk
59 60

Page 1 of 16 ends

Recorded by and for the benefit of,
and When Recorded Mail to:

City of Selma
Community Development Department
1710 Tucker Street
Selma, CA 93662
Exempt from recording fees - Gov. Code Section 27383 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
TRACT NO. 6244 – AMBERWOOD (Phase I)
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 18th day of November 2025, by and between the City of Selma, a municipal corporation (herein "City"), TPG AG EHC III (LEN) CA 5, L. P., a Delaware limited partnership (herein “Owner”) and Lennar Homes of California, LLC, a California limited liability company (as successor-ininterest by conversion to Lennar Homes of California, Inc.) (herein "Subdivider").

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Subdivider has presented to the City a Final Map for the proposed subdivision of land owned by Owner, situated in the City of Selma, County of Fresno, State of California, dividing the real property more particularly described as follows:

Lots 1 through 297, and Outlots A, B, C and D of the Final Map of Tract 6244 according to the map thereof recorded on __________________, in Volume ________ of Plats at
Page(s) _________, Fresno County Records.

WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6244 was approved by Selma City Council on June 21, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as “Subdivision”); and WHEREAS, Subdivider agrees to do, perform and complete the work and matters required in the Conditions of Approval a copy of which is attached as Exhibit “B” and Mitigation Measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report Addendum a copy of which is attached as Exhibit “C” for Vesting Tentative Map No. 6244 approved on June 21, 2021 issued by the City and any amendments thereto (hereinafter referred to as "Conditions of Approval”), hereinafter set forth in detail, within the time hereinafter mentioned, in consideration of the acceptance of the offers of dedication by the City of Selma.

WHEREAS, a Development Agreement for the Amberwood Specific Plan and Tract 6244 was approved by Selma City Council on February 3, 2025, and recorded on June 27, 2025, as Instrument Number 2025-0061698 (hereinafter referred to as “Development Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, Subdivider has now presented a final map to the City for Tract No. 6244, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A" (hereinafter referred to as “Final Map”), and Subdivider has requested City to approve the Final Map so that it may be recorded 61 as required by law; and
WHEREAS, City requires, as a condition precedent to the acceptance and approval of the Final Map, the dedication of such public streets, highways, ways, easements, and other places as delineated and shown on the Final Map, the improvement of the same and other public places by the construction of the improvements specified in this agreement with security to meet these requirements; and
WHEREAS, the improvements of the public streets, highways, ways, easements, and other places, and the performance of the other obligations, has not been done or completed, and, as provided by ordinances of the City of Selma and the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California (Government Code 66244-66499.58), it is required that the Subdivider enter into this Subdivision Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") with City, whereby in consideration of the acceptance by City of the offers of dedication and approval of the Final Map, agrees to complete the work and perform the other obligations specified in this Agreement within the time set forth herein.

WHEREAS, Subdivider understands that the placement and acceptance of all public improvements, and completion of all Conditions of Approval related to the Subdivision, shall be completed prior to Certificates of Occupancy being issued for any lots within the Subdivision, in addition to the following conditions being met:

1. The construction of an accessible path of travel to the public way along said single-family residential lots is made a condition upon the building permit for the particular home, with completion of the sidewalk, including the driveway approach and street trees, required prior to occupancy.

2. All other Conditions of Approval have been satisfied by the Subdivider and all other public improvements have been completed, with the exception to Condition of Approval #8 as follows:
a. Condition of Approval #8 provides that no above-ground transformer is permitted on the required sidewalk within the public right-of-way. All existing overhead and new utility facilities located onsite, or within the street rights-of-way adjacent to this subdivision shall be underground.
b. Due to estimated additional costs of $20,000 per subsurface transformer (estimated total of 35 transformers), an increase of 40% for PG&E contract for subsurface transformers and a shortage of subsurface transformers creating an 18-24 month delay availability the Subdivider proposes and the City agrees to allow Subdivider to install pad-mount transformers throughout the Subdivision and provide screening per PG&E Guidance Document 063422 “Landscape Screens for Pad-Mounted Transformers” (dated 02-02-02).

3. All sidewalks along residential side yards, or any side of the lot that does not have a planned driveway approach, have been constructed.

4. All sidewalks along the perimeter major streets have been constructed.

5. All sidewalks along the entry streets to the Subdivision have been 62 constructed, from the major street to the first local residential street intersection within the Subdivision.

6. And either:
a. All sidewalks have been constructed on the side of the street containing street lighting or underground street light conduit; or b. All underground street light conduits have been protected by an alternative method to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

7. All sidewalks have been constructed along the complete frontage of any temporary ponding basins and any Outlots being dedicated to the City, including but not limited to park sites and well sites.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the acceptance of the offers of dedication of the public streets, highways, ways, easements, and other places and the approval of the map for filing and recording as provided and required by law, it is agreed by the parties hereto as follows:

1. Subdivider shall perform the work and improvements hereinafter specified to the satisfaction of the Engineer defined hereinafter. Subdivider understands and agrees that the following schedule of work is intended to provide a guideline as to diligent prosecution of the work under this agreement.

The Subdivider agrees to the following construction schedule:

Pursuant to Subdivision Map Act §66411.1 and Selma Municipal Code Section 9-6-1, et seq., the undersigned hereby certifies and acknowledges that the construction of improvements identified herein shall be completed on or before one (1) year of the date of this Agreement, or any approved extension thereof.

If the construction of the improvements shall be delayed, the time for completion thereof may be extended by City for such period of time as City may deem reasonable.

The City shall grant any reasonable request for an extension of time for completion, in increments of one (1) year each.

2. Wherever used in this Agreement, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning herein given, unless the context requires a different meaning:
"Engineer" shall mean the City Engineer of the City of Selma, or his duly authorized representative.
"Inspector" shall mean the Engineer and/or the Building Official of the City of Selma.
"Standard Specifications" shall mean the City of Selma, County of Fresno, and/or State of California Standard Specifications, including attached details 63 and amendments thereto, as applicable. Priority is set forth in section 3 herein.
"Division" shall mean and include the real property shown and described on the Final Map as being divided into parcels, including street areas of adjacent existing public streets to the centerline thereof.

3. All the work and improvements and materials shall be performed, installed, and provided in strict accordance with the applicable Standard Specifications, approved plans and details submitted by Yamabe and Horn Engineering, approved on April 22, 2025, (hereinafter referred to as “Plans”) incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

All of said work and improvements shall also comply with the requirements of the Selma Municipal Code in all matters not otherwise controlled by the Standard Specifications.

All of said work and improvements and materials shall be done, performed, and installed under the supervision of the Engineer, under whose direction the work shall be inspected as it progresses.

Notwithstanding the fact that the Subdivider's Plans and specifications, completion of the work, and other acts are subject to the approval of the City, it is understood and agreed that any approval of the City hereof shall in no way relieve Subdivider of satisfactorily performing said work or Subdivider's obligations hereunder.

In the event of a conflict where more than one of the above Standard Specifications and/or Special Details addresses the matter of concern, the following is the priority of application: first, the approved Development Agreement; second, this Subdivision Agreement; third, the City of Selma Municipal Code; fourth, the County of Fresno Ordinance Code; and fifth, the State of California. The determination of the Engineer is final for the purposes of this Agreement.

4. Subdivider agrees to perform and construct all work and improvements shown on the Plans on file in the offices of the Engineer.

5. Subdivider and City hereby agree that Subdivider is obligated to pay those fees and charges identified in Exhibit “D” of the Agreement as follows:
• Prior to Final Map recordation, Public Improvement Inspection Fees in the amount of $410,616.40.
• Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, estimated Impact Fees in the amount of $2,150,015.79. City has agreed that Subdivider shall receive estimated reimbursement/fee credits in the amount of $1,850,666.77, as detailed in Exhibit “D” of this agreement, which shall offset the estimated Impact Fee amount to be paid. • Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, estimated outside agency fees in the amount of $2,451,141.00 as detailed in Exhibit “D” of this Agreement.

6. Neither the City nor any of its officers or agents shall be liable to Subdivider or Subdivider's employees, agents and/or contractors for any error or omission arising out of or in connection with any work to be performed under this Agreement. 64 7. The City shall not be liable to the Subdivider or to any other person, firm, or corporation whatsoever, for any injury or damage that may result to any person or property by or from any cause whatsoever in, on, or about the subdivision of said land covered by this Agreement, or any part thereof. The preceding sentence shall not apply to any liability, loss, or cost of damage caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its agents.

The Subdivider hereby releases and agrees to indemnify and hold the City, Engineer, and its officers, agents, employees, consultants and volunteers harmless from and against any and all injuries to and deaths of persons or injuries to property, and all claims, demands, costs, loss, damage and liability, howsoever the same may be caused and whensoever the same may appear, resulting directly or indirectly from the performance or nonperformance of any or all work to be done in and upon the street rights-of-way in said Subdivision and upon the premises adjacent thereto pursuant to this Agreement, and also from any and all injuries to and deaths of persons and injuries to property or other interests, and all claims, demands, costs, loss, damage, and liability, howsoever same may be caused and whensoever same may appear, either directly or indirectly made or suffered by the Subdivider, the Subdivider's agents, employees, and subcontractors, while engaged in the performance of said work. The preceding sentence shall not apply to any liability, loss, or cost of damage caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its agents.

8. Prior to the commencement of any work pursuant to this Agreement, Subdivider's contractors shall furnish the City satisfactory evidence of an insurance policy written upon a form and by a company which meets with the approval of City insuring the City, Engineer and its officers, agents, employees, consultants and volunteers, against loss or liability which may arise during the work or which may result from any of the work herein required to be done, including all costs of defending any claim arising as a result thereof. The minimum limits of such policy shall be the amount required by the City’s Insurance Provider:
• Comprehensive General and Aggregate Liability (Coverage should be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial Liability Coverage (Occurrence Form CG001) (Broad Comprehensive General Liability) $3,000,000 and $6,000,000, respectively, combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.
• Automobile Liability (Coverage should be at least as broad Insurance Services Office Form CA0001 coverage Automobile Liability, Code 1 (any autos) $2,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage (owned or non-owned auto).
• Workers Compensation and Employee Liability: Workers
Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employee's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.

Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to the City, Engineer, its officers, officials, employees, consultants and volunteers; or the Subdivider shall provide a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims, administration and 65 defense expenses.

9. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
• The City, Engineer, its officers, officials, employees, agents, consultants and volunteers are to be covered as insured with respects to: liability arising out of the activities performed by or on behalf of the Subdivider; products and completed operations of the Subdivider; premises owned, occupied or used by the Subdivider; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Subdivider. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, Engineer, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. • For any claims related to this project, the Subdivider's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects to the City, Engineer, its officers, officials, employees, agents, consultants or volunteers. Any insurance or selfconsultants or volunteers shall be in excess of the Subdivider's insurance and shall not contribute to it.
• Any failure to comply with reporting and other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
• The Subdividers insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insured's liability.
• Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after prior written notice of 30 days by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.

Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's Rating of no less than A:VII. Subdivider shall furnish the City with original endorsements affecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Subdivider's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications.

Subdivider shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all the requirements stated herein.

10. Subdivider shall file a Notice of Completion of the improvements herein specified.
• Prior to recordation of the Final Map and issuance of permits, Developer shall furnish the improvement securities identified in Exhibit D (Improvement Security Schedule), which, at a minimum, include: (a) a faithful performance security for all required public improvements; (b) a labor and materials (payment) security covering contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers; (c) a one-year maintenance security for 66 electrical and mechanical equipment associated with the water supply/distribution and sewer collection/treatment facilities; (d) a one-year maintenance security for private roads; (e) a monumentation security for all required survey monuments and lot corners not yet set; and (f) a security for taxes and special assessments equal to liens not yet payable, all in the forms and amounts stated in Exhibit D and consistent with SMC 9-6-12.04. Securities may be provided as cash deposit, surety bond, irrevocable instrument of credit, or escrow deposit, with any surety licensed in California and forms approved by the City Attorney, and reductions and releases shall occur only as permitted by the Municipal Code after completion and acceptance, without limiting warranty obligations.
• Security payment in the estimated amount of taxes and special assessments collected as taxes which are a lien, but which are not yet payable as referred to in §66493 of the Subdivision Map Act or satisfactory evidence in the form of a written receipt of payment of said taxes and special assessments as described herein at the time of recordation of the Map included in Exhibit “E”. • Costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's and administrative fees, incurred by the local agency in successfully enforcing the obligation secured as a part of the obligation guaranteed by the security and in addition to the face amount of the security shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider.

11. Subdivider and Subdivider's contractor and subcontractors shall pay for any materials, provisions and other supplies or terms used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, and for any work or labor thereon of any kind and for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act of the State of California, with respect to such work or labor, and shall file with City pursuant to §3800 of the Labor Code a Certificate of Worker's Compensation and shall maintain a valid policy of Workers Compensation Insurance for the duration for the period of construction.

12. Compaction and soil tests and retests shall be paid for by Subdivider. Street and utility trench tests shall be taken in varying locations and depths as required and directed by the Engineer. Compaction tests failing to meet City's requirements shall require recompaction of the area and retesting until compaction requirements are achieved.

13. Subdivider shall comply with Street, Plumbing, Building, Electrical, and Zoning Codes and any other Codes of the City and Subdivider shall secure an Encroachment Permit from City and provide the necessary insurance policies required under said encroachment permit before working on any City or Public right-of-way or property, except utility trenching approved by the Engineer as not requiring encroachment permit.

14. It shall be the responsibility of Subdivider to coordinate all work done by Subdivider's contractors and subcontractors, such as scheduling the sequence of operations and the determination of liability if one operation delays another. In no case shall representatives of City be placed in the position of making decisions that are the responsibility of Subdivider. Subdivider shall provide the Engineer with written notice not less than two (2) working days in advance of the actual date on which work is to be 67 started. Failure on the part of Subdivider to notify the Engineer may cause delay for which Subdivider shall be solely responsible.

15. Whenever Subdivider varies the period during which work is carried out each day, Subdivider shall give due notice to the Engineer so that proper inspection may be provided. The inspection of the work shall not relieve Subdivider of their obligations to fulfill the agreement as prescribed. Defective work shall be made good and unsuitable materials will be rejected, notwithstanding the fact that such defective work or unsuitable materials have been previously overlooked by the Engineer or Inspector and accepted.

16. Any damage to the water or sewer system, concrete work, or street paving that occurs after installation and prior to release of bid and final acceptance shall be made good to the satisfaction of the Engineer by Subdivider before release of bond and final acceptance of completed work.

17. Adequate dust and mud control shall be maintained by Subdivider on all Streets within and around the subdivision on which work is required to be done under this agreement from the time work is first commenced in the subdivision until the paving of the streets is completed. "Adequate dust control" as used herein shall mean the sprinkling of the streets with water thereon with sufficient frequency to prevent the scattering of dust by wind or the activity of vehicles and equipment onto any street area of private property adjacent to the subdivision. Whenever in the opinion of the Engineer adequate dust control is not being maintained on any street or streets as required by this paragraph, the Engineer shall give notice to Subdivider to comply with the provisions of the paragraph forthwith. Such notice may be personally served upon the Subdivider or, if Subdivider is not an individual, upon any person who has signed this Agreement on Behalf of Subdivider or a superintendent or foreman of Subdivider or Subdividers contractors at the subdivision or, at the election of the Engineer, such notice may be mailed to Subdivider at Subdividers address on file with the Engineer. If within 24 hours after such personal service of such notice or within 48 hours after the mailing thereof as herein provided Subdivider shall not have commenced to maintain adequate dust control or shall at any time hereafter fail to maintain adequate dust control, the Engineer may, without further notice of any kind, cause any such street or streets to be sprinkled or oiled, as he may deem advisable to eliminate the scattering of dust, by equipment and personnel of the City or by contract as the Engineer shall determine, and Subdivider agrees to pay to City forthwith, upon receipt of billing thereof the entire cost to City of such sprinkling or oiling. When the surfacing on any existing street is disturbed, this surfacing shall be replaced with temporary or permanent surfacing within fourteen (14) calendar days, and the roadway shall be maintained in a safe and passable condition at all times between commencement and final completion, and adequate dust control shall be maintained during these operations. Additionally, the Subdivider shall comply with all requirements of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.

18. Subdivider shall install all street improvements in accordance with Title IX of the Municipal Code of the City of Selma, the City of Selma Standard Specifications, and the construction plans.

19. Concrete curbs and gutters including but not limited to drive approaches, 68 sewer house laterals, water services, gas mains, and their respective service connections, shall be completed before starting the street surfacing.

20. Time is of the essence with this Agreement, and the same shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns.

21. No assignment of this Agreement nor any duty or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made in whole or in part by Subdivider without the written consent of City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld.

22. This Agreement includes the following exhibits which are included herewith and made a part of this Agreement:
• Exhibit A – Phase I Final Map
• Exhibit B – Conditions of Approval (Tentative Map 6244). • Exhibit C – Mitigation Measures (Findings for Approval) • Exhibit D – Cost Estimates, Warranty, Security, And Impact Fees • Exhibit E – CFD 2006-01, Zone B, Rate of Apportionment

23. Subdivider agrees and does hereby consent and petition to include all twohundred and ninety-seven (297) lots within Phase I of Final Map 6244 as shown on Exhibit “A” to the Community Facilities District 2006-01 (Exhibit “E”), for costs for providing street lighting maintenance, landscape maintenance, park maintenance, street maintenance, storm drain maintenance, sewer maintenance, water line maintenance, police service, and fire prevention services.

24. In the event that either party to bring an action with respect to enforcement of any of the provisions of this Agreement, or the security under this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be awarded its costs including reasonable attorney's fees.

25. The Engineer is assumed to be a just arbitrator between City, Subdivider, and Subdivider's contractor (herein "Contractor') and the entire work is under his jurisdiction to such end.

It is the Engineer's function to interpret the drawings and specifications; pass upon merits of materials or workmanship; compute amounts of and issue certificates for all payments to which Contractor may be entitled; decide upon all deductions from and additions to the contract price resulting from alterations; determine amount of damages accruing to either party from any cause; or conferences at any time during the progress of the work. Should the Subdivider, contractor, or any other party deem the engineer's final decision unjust, written appeal can be made to the City Council of the City of Selma within ten (10) days of the engineer's decision.

26. In the event an extension is granted to the time within which all work for the construction of improvements is to be completed on this Subdivision Map, the Subdivider agrees that it will comply with all the applicable standards in effect at the time the extension is granted.
69 27. It is agreed that all Conditions of Approval of the Tentative Map as modified or agreed by this Agreement, and any Site Plan Review shall apply to and be included in this Agreement.

28. In the event a dispute arises between Subdivider and Engineer an outside arbitrator will be engaged and his decision will be final and the parties further agree that they waive any right they might have to contest such rulings in a court of law except as any arbitrators decision in binding and final arbitration may be appealed to Superior Court under the law governing appeals of binding arbitration in the State of California.

29. Prior to acceptance of any improvements by City, the Subdivider shall provide to City as-built drawings. Subdivider shall provide the City with original plans and Auto Cad files of the Final Map and Improvement Plans.

30. Subdivider agrees that the street lighting and electrical systems shall be constructed pursuant to P.G.& E. and City requirements. The improvement plans shall be submitted to the City for approval and issuance of an encroachment permit prior to installation of the system along with a letter of approval from P.G. & E., which work must be completed before final acceptance of completed work here under.

The parties have executed this Agreement on the 18th day of November 2025.

SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE.
70 The parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written.

CITY OF SELMA, OWNER
A Municipal Corporation TPG AG EHC SD (LEN) CA 1, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
By: _________________________ By: Essential Housing Asset Management, LLC, John Kunkel Date an Arizona limited liability company, its Interim City Manager Authorized Agent
By: __________________________________
Approved as to form: Steven S. Benson Date
Manager
Neal Costanzo,
City Attorney SUBDIVIDER

LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC,
By: _________________________ a California limited liability company (as Date successor in-interest by conversion to Lennar
Homes of California, Inc.)
By: __________________________________
Mike Miller Date
Vice President

ATTACH NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
71 72
EXHIBIT “A”

PHASE I FINAL MAP
73 74
(! ( (

(
Mµ mKMtwc^mMKµ GMcm^µ Dggµ qDt
Mwµ `Dm^µ #=A tMIntKµ zcMµ cmtMwzµ cmµ Mµ gDmKµ
cmµ z`cwµ wGKcwcnmµ `MtMHµ InmwMmzµ 2A z`Mµ qtMqDtDzcnmµ #A tMIntKDzcnmµ nSµ cwµ kDqµ #A n[Mtµ Sntµ KMKcID
nmµ Sntµ qGgcIµ wMµ Mµ qDtIMgwµ #A MDwMkMmµ wqMIcTcMKµ nmµ wDcKµ kDqµ Dwµ cmmKMKµ Sntµ qGgcIµ wMµ Sntµ z`Mµ qtqnwMwµ wqMIcScMKµ MtMcm µ
4 A
A P`Iµ c³²µ gMmµ IDµ 3µ hqµ A KPgDtMµ gckcKµ qDtzmPtw`cqµ G:µ MwwMm
Dgµ `nwcm^µ DwwMzµ kDmD^MkMmzµ ggIµ #A Dtc¢nmDµ jckcKµ jcDGcgczµ InkqDmµ cµ Dntc¢MKµ D^Mmzµ
G;µ¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥µ¦µ
mKµ wMIfNgµ
6A Dntc£MKµ tMqtMwNmzD
µ

&(% (
A #$)'=A qGgcIµ ntµ nzbOtµ nSScIMtµ InkqgO
m^µ zbcwµ IOtzcScIDzMµ tcScOwµ nmg µ z`Mµ
cKPmzcz µ nSµ z`Oµ cmKcdKDgµ <$A wc^mOKµ Oµ KnIkPmzµ ,$A cI`µ z`cwµ IPt ScIDzPµ cwµ
Dz|EI`OKµ #A #$)A zbOµ zvzbTgmOwwµ DIItDI µ ntµ DgcKczµ nTµ 0)A KnIkOmzµ wzDµ nTµ $7#)=A nUµ¥¥¥¥¥¥¥§µ 4
nm´µ .,.5µ GOTntOµ kOµ¨©¨¨¨©¨¨¨¨©¨ªµµ #$)'=A qGgcIµ qOtwnmDgg µ DqqODtOKµ¨¨¨©¨¨¨¨µµ <$A qtnKµ )$A kOµ $#A z`Oµ GDwcwµ nTµ wD
wSDIzptµ PKPmIMµ )$A GPµ Oµ qPtwnmµ nwOµ mDkPµ cwµ wGwItcGPKµ )$A zbPµ z`cmµ cmwzvkMmzµ #A DIfmngOK^MKµ )%A kOµ zbDzµ `O(w`O)zbOµ OOIzOKµ zbOµ wDkOµ cmµ `cw*`Mt(Mctµ Dz`ntc¤OKµ &
)=A #A )
)A G µ `cw(aOt(z`Mctµ wc^mDztMµ nmµ Oµ
cmwkPmzµ Oµ qPtwnmµ ntµ Pµ Om
zµ qnmµ GP`DgSµ nSµ bcI`µ Oµ qOtwnmµ DIKµ PPIKµ zbOµ cmwzvkOmzµ
cµ IOtzcT µ mKOtµ qOmDgz µ nSµ &'7'=A mKOtµ zbOµ gDwµ nTµ z`Oµ wzOµ nSµ¨©«©©«µ¬µ Dzµ Oµ SntO^ncm^µ qDtD^tDq`µ cwµ Mµ #A InttOIz µ
Pwwµ "=A
#
&'
#)A mDkOµ
"=A Inkkcwwcnmµ OqctOw<µ
wc^mDztOµ
$7#)=A nS=
Inkkcwwcnmµ mkGOt=µ

(
(
KnIkOmzµ mn!µ©¨¨¨©¨¨¨©¨¨¨µµ TPPµ¨¨µ
TcgMKµ cwµ®®¥µKD µ nSµ¯¯¯¯°µµ .,.5µ )A>>>>>?@A"

cmµ ngkOµ««µ nTµ qgDzwµ )A qD^Owµ©©«µµ µ TtOwmnµ $7#)=A tOIntKwµ )A Oµ tOsOwzµ nTµ zr^µ D^µ O`Iµ c²²µ gOmµ A 5µ iq!µ qDgµ KcIwµ I!q!D!µ $7#)=A tMIntKMtµ
G>µ±¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥µ®µ
KPqzµ
( (

(
A wncgwµ tPqntzµ `Dwµ GPPmµ qtMqDtPKµ Sntµ z`cwµ qtnqOtzµ #A cwµ $#A ScgOµ cµ Pµ )=
Om^cmOOtµ nSµ z`Oµ
)=A nSµ wOgkD"µ zbOµ wncgwµ tOqntzµ Dwµ qtOqDtOKµ G µ ftD¤Dmµ µ DwwnI+DµzPwµ cmIµ )A Dqtcgµ .5µ .,-9µ #A cwµ tMXOtOmIMKµ Dwµ &'$)A #$ A ,-.
-9,62 µ
(
( (
z`Oµ wnz`µ gcmOµ nTµ z`Oµ wnzbODwzµ sDtzRtµ nSµ wMIzcnmµ 0.µ zpmw`cqµ -5µ wnzbµ tDm^Oµ ..µ ODwzµ "$7#)A KcDGgnµ GDwOµ #A kOtcKcDmµ
DwwkPKµ )%A GOµ mntzbµ 8906 0,µ wz#µ
wOMµ w`OOzµ 0µ nSµ -,µ Sntµ kntMµ cmSntkDzdnmµ
#&((

( A A .5,, µ

A

(
( ( ( ( " (
( (
!(
(
$( "
(

( (

(

(

(
(
(

( (
( ( (

(
( (

(
"#'(
(

( (
"
%(
%( &

( ( ( (
(

!( ( (
(
( ( ( (
( (
tPDgµ qtnqPtz µ cmµ Pµ
)=A nSµ wPgkDµ $7#)=A nSµ StPwmnµ (.Aµ nSµ IDgcSntmcDµ KPwItcGOKµ Dwµ Snggnw?µ qDtIMgµ
Dggµ zbDzµ qnt
nmµ nTµ gDmKµ KOwItcGOKµ Dwµ 7()A qDtIOgµ A nTµ ) )A IOtcmµ gnzµ gcmOµ DKewzkOmzµ &!#A .2
.9µ tOIntKOKµ
Dqtcgµ 2µ .,.5µ Dwµ
#(57"#)A mnµ .,.5
,,00278µ nTµ nSScIcDgµ tOIntKwµ nTµ TtMwmnµ $7#)=A GOcm^µ Stz`Otµ KOwItcGOKµ Dwµ Snggnw?µ7(*A qDtIOgµ D=µ
z`Mµ wzµ `DgSµ nTµ z`Oµ ODwzµ `DgTµ nTµ zbOµ wnz`wzµ sDtzOtµ nTµ z`Oµ wnODwzµ sDtzOtµ nSµ wOI nmµ 0.µ zpw`cqµ -5µ
wnzbµ tDm^Oµ ..µ ODwzµ "$7#)A KcDGgnµ GDwOµ #A kOtcKcDmµ cmµ z`Oµ )=A nSµ wOgkDµ $7#)=A nTµ TtOwmnµ ()/A nSµ IDgcTntmcDµ $'
#
A ,$A z`Pµ nSScIcDgµ &!)A zbOtOnTµ
zn^OOtµ µ z`Mµ ODwzµ `DgSµ nSµ z`Oµ ODwzµ `DgSµ nTµ Oµ ($7) :()A sDtzRtµ nSµ z`Oµ wnODwzµ sDttBµ #A Oµ ;()A `DgTµ nSµ Pµ Mwzµ `DgSµ nSµ z`Oµ wnzbODwzµ sDtzRtµ nTµ z`Pµ wnz`PDwzµ sDttBµ #A zbPµ wzµ `DgSµ nSµ z`Pµ ODwzµ `DgSµ nTµ z`Mµ wzµ `DgSµ nTµ z`Oµ wnODwzµ sDttµ nTµ zbOµ wnzbMDwzµ sDt{Otµ nTµ wOIzdnmµ 0.µ znw`cqµ -5µ wnzbµ tDm^Oµ ..µ ODwzµ "$7#)A KcDGgnµ GDwOµ #A kOtcKcDmµ cmµ Mµ
)=A nTµ wMgkDµ $7#)=A nSµ TtMwmnµ wzDµ nSµ IDgcSntmcDµ DIIntKcm^µ )%A Oµ nSZcIcDgµ qgDzµ PtPnTµ
OIMq
m^µ OtOTtnkµ Dzµ qnt
nmµ nSµ z`Oµ Owzµ `DgSµ nSµ zbOµ wzµ `DgTµ nSµ Oµ wnMDwzµ sDt{Otµ nTµ zbOµ wnODwzµ sDtzPtµ #A z`Pµ wzµ `DgSµ nSµ z`Pµ PDwzµ `DgSµ nTµ z`Oµ Pwzµ `DgSµ nSµ Pµ wnz`PDwzµ sDtzPtµ nTµ Pµ wnz`ODwzµ sDtzOtµ nTµ wDcKµ wOIzdnmµ 0.µ KOwItcGOKµ Dwµ Snggnw=µ
GO^cmmcm^µ )A zbOµ mntPDwzµ IntmOtµ nSµ z`Oµ wzµ `DgSµ nSµ Pµ PDwzµ `DgTµ nSµ Oµ Owzµ `DgTµ nTµ z`Pµ wnz`PDwzµ sDttµ nTµ z`Oµ wnzbMDwzµ sDtzMtµ nSµ wDcKµ wOIzcnmµ 0.Bµ z`OmIMµ wnz`µ ,-8 .9µ Owzµ Dgnm^µ zbMµ ODwzµ gcmOµ nTµ wDcKµ wzµ `DgTµ

50.!-5µ SOOzµ )%A Oµ GO^cmmcm^µ nSµ A #$#zDm^Omzµ ItOµ InmIDPµ ,$A z`Oµ wnz`Owzµ `Dcm^µ A tDKcwµ nTµ 055!5,µ SPOzµ # )$A cI`µ wDcKµ GO^cmmcm^µ A tDKcDgµ gcmPµ GPDtwµ #$') A 68.8 .9µ PDw|Bµ PmIMµ mntz`w}Otgµ -05$-2µ SOOzµ Dgnm^µ wDcKµ mnm
zDm^Pmzµ ItPµ )
'$7

A A IPmDgµ Dm^gPµ nTµ .-26 29Bµ z`PmIOµ mntµ 208 .,µ w|µ 07.$-9µ SPPzµ 3A Oµ GP^cmmcm^µ nTµ A zDm^Omzµ ItMµ InmIDµ )%A Oµ mntODwzµ
9#
A A tDKcwµ nTµ 272"5,µ SMM|Bµ OmIOµ mntwtgµ -79"80µ SMOzµ Dgnm^µ wDcKµ zDm^Mmzµ Itµ tn^`µ A IOmztDgµ Dm^gMµ nSµ .-2. 5-µ ,$A Pµ #$'0A gcmPµ nSµ z`Pµ wnz`ODwzµ sDtzOtµ nSµ Oµ wnzbODwzµ sDtzMtµ nSµ wDcKµ wMI
nmµ 0.Bµ MmIOµ wnµ 8906 -9µ ODwzµ Dgnm^µ wDcKµ #$') A gcmOµ 2.6!,6µ SMOzµ )$A z`Oµ &$
#)A nSµ
GP^cmmcm^!µ
wGeOIzµ )$A A &'
8/A DIIOwwµ #A 7)
!
)=A ODwOkMmzµ ntµ #A DItnwwµ )
)A &$')
$#A nSµ zbOµ ODwzµ `DgSµ nSµ Mµ ODwzµ `DgSµ
nTµ z`Pµ wnwzµ sDttµ nSµ Pµ wnz`PDwzµ sDtzPtBµ #A Pµ Pwzµ `DgSµ nTµ zbPµ Pwzµ `DgSµ nSµ Pµ wnzbPDwzµ sDtzPtµ nTµ z`Oµ wnODwzµ sDtzOtBµ #A z`Oµ wzµ `DgTµ nTµ Oµ ODwzµ `DgTµ nTµ zbOµ wzµ `DgTµ nTµ zbOµ wnODwzµ sDt{Ptµ nTµ zbOµ wnzbODwzµ sDtzMtµ nSµ wOI
nmµ 0.µ w`cqµ -5µ wnµ tDm^Oµ ..µ ODw|µ "$7#)A KcDGgnµ GDwOµ #A kOtcKcDmµ DIIntKcm^µ )$ z`Pµ nSTcIcDgµ qgDzµ zbPtPnSµ KOwItcGOKµ Dwµ Snggnw=µ
GM^cmmcm^µ )A zbOµ wnMDwzµ IntmOtµ nSµ z`Oµ wzµ `DgSµ nSµ Oµ MDwzµ `DgSµ nTµ Oµ Mwzµ `DgTµ nSµ z`Mµ wnMDwzµ sDttµ nSµ z`Oµ wnMDwzµ sDtzRtµ nSµ wDcKµ wMIzcnmµ 0.Bµ MmIMµ mntzbµ 8906µ 0,µ Pwzµ Dgnm^µ zbOµ wnµ gcmOµ nTµ Oµ wnz`MDwzµ
sDtzPtµ nSµ wDcKµ wPIzcnmµ 0.µ A KcwzDmIPµ nSµ 2,!,,µ SPPzµ )$A A &$ #)A $#A A gcmPµ qDtDggOgµ zbµ #A GPcm^µ 2,!,,µ SPOzµ Pwzµ nTµ z`Oµ ODwzµ gcmOµ nTµ wDcKµ Owzµ `DgTµ nTµ z`Oµ ODwzµ `DgTµ nTµ Oµ wzµ `DgTµ nTµ Oµ wnODwzµ sDtzOtµ nTµ Oµ wnODwzµ sDttµ nSµ wPI
nmµ 0.Bµ z`PmIOµ mntzbµ ,-8 .9µ PDwzµ Dgnm^µ wDcKµ qDtDggOgµ gcmPµ 657-2µ SPPzµ )%A Pµ GP^cmmcm^µ nSµ zDm^Omzµ Itµ InmIDOµ 3A z`Oµ wnz`Owzµ `Dm^µ tDKcwµ nSµ .9,",,µ SOOzBµ z`OmIOµ mntzbwzRtgµ ..,µ75µ SOOzµ Dgnm^µ wDcKµ zDm^Pmzµ ItMµ tn^`µ A IOmDgµ Dm^gOµ nTµ 2006 29 Cµ PmIOµ #$')
A 20-8 .,µ Owzµ 07.!-9µ SOOzµ -$A zbOµ GO^cmmcm^µ
nSµ A zDm^Omzµ ItMµ InmIDµ )%A Oµ mntODwzµ `Dm^µ A tDKcwµ nSµ 52,%,,µ SMM|Bµ OmIOµ mntwtgµ .0,&85µ TOOzµ Dgnm^µ wDcKµ zDm^Pmzµ Itµ tn^`µ A IMmztDgµ Dm^gOµ nSµ .2/9 18~nµ Pµ mntµ gcmPµ nSµ Oµ wnzbµ `DgSµ nSµ wDcKµ wPI nmµ

0.Bµ z`OmIOµ wnzbµ 8906 -9 µ ODwzµ Dgnm^µ wDcKµ mntzbµ gcmMµ 69&95µ SMOzµ )%A zbOµ GO^cmmcm^µ nSµ A mnm zDm^Mmzµ ItMµ InmIDµ
-$A zbOµ mntODwzµ
9#
A tDKcwµ nTµ 272
5,µ TOOzµ #A )%A `cI`µ wDcKµ &$
#)A nTµ GO^cmmcm^µ A tDKcDgµ gcmOµ GODtwµ wnµ
68 /2 0-µ w|Bµ PmIOµ wnPDwtgµ -79"80µ SPOzµ Dgnm^µ wDcKµ mnm zDm^Omzµ Itµ )
'$7

A A IPmDgµ Dm^gOµ nSµ /-

2. 5-Bµ
PmIOµ wnµ 20-8 .,µ PDwzµ 07.!-9µ SPPzµ )$A Oµ GO^cmmcm^µ nTµ zDm^Omzµ ItOµ InmIDµ -%A Pµ wnwzµ `Dm^µ tDKcwµ nTµ 055!5,µ SMO|Bµ z`OmIOµ wnzbMDwtgµ -05"-2µ SOOzµ Dgnm^µ wDcKµ zDm^Omzµ Itµ z`tn^`µ IOmDgµ Dm^gOµ nTµ .-26 29µ 3A A &$
#)A nmµ wDcKµ ODwzµ gcmPBµ z`MmIOµ wnzbµ ,-8 .9µ wzµ Dgnm^µ wDcKµ MDwzµ gcmMµ 7892-µ SMOzµ -%A zbOµ &$ #)A nT
GO^cmmcm^!µ
qDtIMgµ
z`Oµ wzµ `DgTµ nTµ z`Oµ wnzbOwzµ sDtzOtµ nSµ zbOµ wnzbODwzµ sDtzOtµ nTµ wOIzdnmµ 0.µ znw`cqµ -5µ wnzbµ tDm^Oµ ..µ ODwzµ knmzµ KcDGgnµ GDwOµ #A kMtcKcDmµ DIIntKcm^µ )$A zbOµ nSTcIcDgµ qgDzµ zbOtMnVµ OIOqzdm^µ zbOtOTtnkµ zbOµ Owzµ 0,µ TOOzµ nTµ zbOµ wnz`µ 80,,,µ TOOzµ z`OtOnT!µ Dgwnµ PIPq
m^µ PtOStnkµ z`Pµ PDwzµ -.5!,,µ SPPzµ nSµ z`Oµ wzµ -55!,,µ TPPzµ nSµ Oµ mntz`µ -0,!,,µ SPPzµ nSµ Oµ wnzbµ -6,,,µ TOOzµ zbOtOnT!µ
qDtIPgµ 0@µ
z`Dzµ &$'1$#A nTµ zbMµ wnzbODwzµ sDtzRtµ nSµ zbOµ wnzbwzµ sDtzOtµ nTµ wMIzdnmµ 0.µ znw`cqµ A wnzbµ tDm^Oµ ..µ MDw|µ knmzµ KcDGgnµ GDwPµ #A kOtcKcDmµ DIIntKcm^µ )$A Oµ n\cIcDgµ qgDzµ PtOnVµ gcm^µ wnPtg µ #A PDwtg µ nSµ )')A mnµ -752µ ntDm^OnnKµ qDtfµ tOIntKOKµ nIznGOtµ -6µ -959µ cmµ Gnnfµ -9µ nTµ qgDzwµ )A qD^Oµ 9,µ TtOwmnµ $7#)=A tOIntKwµ # g cm^µ mntzbMtgµ nTµ 5)A #$
A -9-.µ tnwOkDtµ OwzDzMwµ #$
A .µ tOIntKMKµ #7'=A -.µ -96.µ
#A Gnnfµ .-µ nTµ qgDzwµ )A qD^Oµ
-0µ StPwmnµ $7#)=A tPIntKw!µ
qDtIMg2=µ
z`Oµ PDwzµ -.5,,µ SOOzµ nTµ zbOµ Pwzµ -55!,,µ SPOzµ nTµ zbOµ #$') A -0,!,,µ SOOzµ nTµ zbOµ wnzbµ -6,!,,µ SPOzµ nTµ zbOµ Pwzµ `DgTµ nTµ z`Mµ wnz`Mwzµ sDtzOtµ nTµ zbMµ wnzbMDwzµ sDtzOtµ nSµ wMIzcnmµ 0.µ zpmw`cqµ -5µ wnz`µ tDm^Mµ MDw|µ k!K!G!µ µ k!µ "# &(
(
0 (A "&A Dwµ qtOqDtMKµ G µ kOµ ntµ mKOtµ "=A KctMI
nmµ #A cwµ GDwPKµ qnmµ
ScMgKµ wtO µ cmµ InmSntkDmIOµ :
)
A Oµ tOsctOkOmzyµ nSµ zbOµ wGKcwcnmµ "&A
)A #A gnIDgµ ntKcmDmIPµ )A z`Oµ tPsOwzµ nSµ gPmmDtµ `nkPwµ nTµ IDgcTntmcDµ cmIµ cmµ SOGtDt µ .,.-!µ cµ `OtOG µ wzDzMµ )
)A Dggµ Oµ knmkOmzwµ DtOµ nTµ z`Oµ
I`DtDItµ #A nIIq µ z`Oµ qnwczcnmwµ
#
AKµ ntµ 0)A Oµ ggµ GOµ wMzµ cmµ
nwOµ qnwczcnmwµ $#A ntµ GOTntOµ nmPµ ODtµ nSµ Pµ Aµ cwµ "&A cwµ tPIntKMKµ ntµ #=A zdkOµ OzRmwcnmµ DqqtnMKµ G µ z`Oµ
)=A Om^cmOOt'µ Oµ knmkOmzwµ DtOµ ntµ
ggµ GOµ w]cIcOmzµ -$A OmDGgOµ z`Oµ wtM µ )%A GOµ tOztDIOKµ #A ) )A zbcwµ TcmDgµ
"&A wGwzDmzdDggµ InmTntkwµ )$A Oµ InmKc
nmDgg µ DqqtnKµ zPm
µ "&

DgzPtµ 8
A 0$"(A qgwµ 8086µ KDzMµ
&(
(
(
cµ 8
A I
µ `ntmµ `OtOG µ wzDzRµ )
)A cµ `DOµ ODkcmOKµ cwµ DmmOOKµ kDqµ Dzµ
Oµ wGKccwcnmµ w`nmµ cwµ wGwzDmzcDggµ zbOµ wDkOµ Dwµ )A DqqODtOKµ $#A Oµ
mzDzcMµ "&A #A #=A &&'$8A DgtD
nmwµ zbOtPnSµ #A )
)A Dggµ
&'$8
(
$#(A nTµ wOIzcnmµ 662.5µ z`tn^`µ 6625,µ cmIgwcMµ nTµ z`Oµ ^ntmkOmzµ InKOµ #A #=A gnIDgµ ntKcmDmIMwµ DqqgcIDGgOµ )A Oµ zckOµ nTµ &&'$8!A nSµ Oµ mzDzcOµ "&A `Dµ GOOmµ InkqgcOKµ d"µ
eDwnmµD µDzzwµqMµ83392 KDzMµInmztDIzµ
)=A Pm^cmOPtµ Icz µ nSµ wPgkDµ
&("$'(
(
cµ `OtMG µ wzDzMµ 0)A cµ
Aµ IDtMTgg µ ODkcmOKµ 0
(A "&A #A cµ "A wD
wScOKµ
0)A z`cwµ "&A cwµ zRI`mcIDgg µ InttPIzµ qtwDmzµ )$A zbPµ qtndwcnmwµ nTµ z`Pµ wGKccwcnmµ kDqµ +

'#=A
A DwmcIfµ qgwµ 8-60µ KDzMµ
((

(
wzDµ nTµ IDgcTntmcDµ
$7#)=A nTµ StOwmnµ w!w!µ
cµ eOtnkOµ fOOmOµ wOItO|Et µ -$A z`Oµ qgDmmcm^µ Inkkcwwcnmµ nSµ zbOµ )=A nTµ wOgkDµ
$A `PtMG µ IOtzdT µ z`Dzµ cµ `Dµµ MDkcmMKµ z`cwµ "&A zbDzµ zbMµ wGKcdwcnmµ w`nmµ InmSntkwµ 3A #A cwµ wGwzDm
Dgg µ cmµ InkqgcDmIPµ µ Pµ DqqtnPKµ mzD
µ
"&A #A z`Oµ tOsctOkOmµ ckqnwOKµ G µ zbOµ wOgkDµ qgDmmcm^µ Inkkcwwcnmµ Dwµ InmKczdnmµ -%A zbOµ DIIMqzDmIMµ nSµ zbMµ TcmDgµ "&A z`cwµ "&A cwµ cmµ D^tMOkOmzµ zbµ Pµ DKnqzPKµ ^PmPtDgµ qgDmµ Sntµ z`Pµ
)=A nTµ wPgkD!µ
eOtnkMµ fMOmMµ KDµ
wOItP|Dtµ 3A qgDmmcm^µ Inkkcwwcnmµ
&(
(

(
cµ wDtDµ k
µ IDtgwnmµ
)=A IgOtfµ nSµ z`Oµ
)=A nSµ wOgkDµ `PtOGµ IMt
Tµ z`Dzµ
z`Mµ
)=A DqqtnKµ Mµ cmµ "&A #A DIIOqzMKµ nmµ GO`DgSµ nTµ Oµ qGgcIµ Dgg qDtIOgwµ nSµ gDmKµ #A MDwOkMmzwµ nYSMtOKµ Sntµ KOKcIDzdnmµ Sntµ qGgcIµwOµ cmµInmSntkczµ :
)
A Oµ tkwµ nSµ P nSSPtµ nTµ KOKcID
nm&µ
wDtDµk
µIDtgwnmµ

)=A IgOtfµ
KDzRµ

GujµFQmQµxczQµWuQxmoµJFµ

zQjAµ

QGxczQAµ¡mL`Qm_u&Jolµ
75 76
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

LEGEND:

ORANGE AVENUE

EAST FLORAL AVENUE

SOUTH DEL REY AVENUE

EAST HUNTSMAN AVENUE ALIGNMENT

SOUTH DOCKERY AVENUE SELMA BRANCH CANAL
CONTROL DIAGRAM:

COORDINATE LISTING:

SURVEY NOTES:
77 184
4,528 S.F.
185
4,528 S.F.
186
4,528 S.F.
187
4,529 S.F.
188
4,529 S.F.
1 4,480 S.F.
2 4,000 S.F.
3 4,000 S.F.
4 4,000 S.F.
189
4,529 S.F.
190
4,529 S.F.
191
4,529 S.F.
192
4,529 S.F.
193
4,529 S.F. 194 5,130 S.F.
195
7,422 S.F.
199
4,579 S.F.
211
4,455 S.F.
210
4,455 S.F.
209
4,455 S.F.
208
4,455 S.F.
207
4,455 S.F.
206
4,455 S.F.
205
4,455 S.F.
204
4,455 S.F.
203
5,229 S.F.
222
4,050 S
223
4,050 S.F.
224
4,050 S.F.
225
4,050 S.F.
226
4,050 S.F.
227
4,050 S.F.
228
4,050 S.F.
229
4,050 S.F.
230
4,050 S.F.
231
4,909 S.F.
232
4,480 S.F.
233
4,080 S.F.
234
4,080 S.F.
236
4,080 S.F.
248
4,080 S.F.
249
4,479 S.F.
250
3,360 S.F.
251
3,080 S.F.
252
3,080 S.F.
253
3,080 S.F.
254
3,080 S.F.
255
3,080 S.F.
256
3,080 S.F.
257
3,080 S.F.
266
3,080 S.F.
267
3,080 S.F.
268
3,080 S.F.
269
3,080 S.F.
270
3,080 S.F.
271
3,080 S.F.
272
3,080 S.F.
273
3,359 S.F.
27 3,360
27 3,080
27 3,080
27 3,080
27 3,080
27 3,080
28 3,080
28 3,080
246
4,080 S.F.
245
4,080 S.F.
244
4,080 S.F.
247
4,080 S.F.
237
4,080 S.F.
200
4,502 S.F.
196
6,542 S.F.
198
4,826 S.F.
235
4,080 S.F.

OUTLOT D
5,208 S.F.
197
8,318 S.F.

OUTLOT C
16,314 S.F.
201
5,359 S.F.
202
9,431 S.F.
2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM

MANGO AVENUE

CITRUS AVENUE

TANGELO AVENUE

CHERRY AVENUE
MULBERRY AVENUENOTES:

ORANGE AVENUE

DOCKERY AVENUE
LEGEND:

SEE SHEET 6
SEE SHEET 5

MAPLE STREET
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
78 ,
5 4,000 S.F.
6 4,000 S.F.
7 4,000 S.F.
8 4,000 S.F.
9 4,000 S.F.
10 4,000 S.F.
11 4,000 S.F.
12 4,000 S.F.
13 5,900 S.F.
15 6,801 S.F.
27 6,120 S.F.
28 5,400 S.F.
29 5,400 S.F.
30 5,500 S.F.
31 5,500 S.F.
32 5,500 S.F.
33 5,500 S.F.
34 5,500 S.F.
35 5,500 S.F.
36 5,400 S.F.
37 5,400 S.F.
38 6,119 S.F.
39 5,920 S.F. 40 4,583 S.F. 41 4,583 S.F. 42 4,583 S.F. 43 4,583 S.F. 44 4,583 S.F. 45 4,587 S.F. 46 4,583 S.F. 47 4,583 S.F. 48 4,583 S.F. 49 4,583 S.F. 50 4,583 S.F. 51 4,583 S.F. 52 5,920 S.F. 239
4,080 S.F.
240
4,479 S.F.
241
4,480 S.F.
3,080 S.F.
258
3,080 S.F.
259
3,080 S.F.
260
3,080 S.F.
261
3,359 S.F.
262
3,360 S.F.
263
3,080 S.F.
264
3,080 S.F.
265
3,080 S.F.
3,080 S.F. 3,080 S.F.
282
3,080 S.F.
283
3,080 S.F.
284
3,080 S.F.
285
3,359 S.F.
286
3,360 S.F.
287
3,080 S.F.
288
3,080 S.F.
289
3,080 S.F.
3,080 S.F.
16 5,500 S.F.
17 5,500 S.F.
18 5,500 S.F.
19 5,500 S.F.
20 5,400 S.F.
21 5,400 S.F.
22 5,400 S.F.
23 5,400 S.F.
24 5,400 S.F.
25 5,400 S.F.
243
4,080 S.F.
242
4,080 S.F.
238
4,080 S.F.
14 11,109 S.F.
26 6,133 S.F.
2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM

TANGELO AVENUE

CHERRY AVENUE

MULBERRY AVENUE

PECAN AVENUE

POMEGRANATE AVENUE

PEAR AVENUE

DOCKERY AVENUE
SEE SHEET 4
SEE SHEET 7
LEGEND:

FLORAL AVENUE
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

NOTES:
79 175
4,527 S.F.
176
4,527 S.F.
177
4,527 S.F.
178
4,528 S.F.
179
4,528 S.F.
180
4,528 S.F.
181
4,528 S.F.
182
4,528 S.F.
183
4,528 S.F.
184
4,528 S.F.
185
4,528 S.F.
124
5,144 S.F.
125
4,400 S.F.
128
4,400 S.F.
127
4,400 S.F.
126
4,400 S.F.
141
4,532 S.F.
138
4,635 S.F.
142
5,298 S.F.
140
4,533 S.F. 136 6,017 S.F.
143
5,120 S.F.
144
4,400 S.F.
145
4,399 S.F.
146
4,500 S.F.
147
4,500 S.F.
135
5,876 S.F
137
4,991 S.F.
139
4,635 S.F.
148
5,006 S.F.
149
7,250 S.F.
158
4,200 S.F.
159
4,200 S.F.
160
4,200 S.F.
170 171 8,886 S.F.
4,696 S.F.
172
4,527 S.F.
173
4,527 S.F.
174
4,527 S.F.
213
4,455 S.F.
212
4,455 S.F.
211
4,455 S.F.
0 5 S.F.
217
5,912 S.F.
218
4,500 S.F.
219
4,320 S.F.
220
4,050 S.F.
221
4,050 S.F.
222
4,050 S.F.
223
4,050 S.F.
274
3,360 S.F.
275
3,080 S.F.
276
3,080 S.F.
277
3,080 S.F.
278
3,080 S.F.
279
3,080 S.F.
280
3,080 S.F.
281
3,080 S.F.
282
3,080 S.F.
289
3,080 S.F.
290
3,080 S.F.
291
3,080 S.F.
292
3,080 S.F.
293
3,080 S.F.
294
3,080 S.F.
295
3,080 S.F.
296
3,080 S.F.
297
3,359 S.F.

OUTLOT A
86,813 S.F.
16 4,904
167
5,673 S.F.
168
5,463 S.F.
214
4,455 S.F.
215
4,455 S.F. 216 5,501 S.F.
161
6,423 S.F.
157
4,720 S.F.
150
6,871 S.F.
129
4,400 S.F.
130
4,477 S.F.
131
4,884 S.F.
155
4,320 S.F.
154
4,320 S.F.
153
4,320 S.F.
152
4,320 S.F.
151
4,320 S.F.
156
6,111 S.F.
169
6,278 S.F.
2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM

PECAN AVENUE

SPRUCE AVENUE
SEE SHEET 4
SEE SHEET 7

MULBERRY AVENUE

MANGO AVENUE

PECAN AVENUE

CITRUS AVENUE

PERSIMMON AVENUE

APRICOT AVENUE

JUNIPER AVENUE
SEE SHEET 8
LEGEND:

BASIS OF BEARINGS:

NOTES:
80 27
6,120 S.F.
28 00 S.F.
51 ,583 S.F.
52 5,920 S.F. 53 5,920 S.F. 54 4,650 S.F. 55 4,650 S.F. 56 4,650 S.F. 57 4,650 S.F. 58 4,650 S.F. 59 4,650 S.F. 60 4,700 S.F. 61 4,650 S.F. 62 4,650 S.F. 63 4,650 S.F. 64 4,650 S.F. 65 4,650 S.F. 66 4,650 S.F. 67 5,920 S. 68 6,120 S.
69 5,400 S.F.
70 5,400 S.F.
71 5,500 S.F.
72 5,500 S.F.
73 5,500 S.F.
74 5,500 S.F.
75 5,500 S.F.
76 5,500 S.F.
77 5,500 S.F.
78 5,400 S.F.
79 5,400 S.F.
80 6,119 S.F.
82 5,400 S.F.
83 5,400 S.F.
84 5,400 S.F.
85 5,400 S.F.
86 5,400 S.F.
87 5,400 S.F.
88 5,500 S.F.
89 5,500 S.F.
90 5,500 S.F.
91 5,500 S.F.
92 5,500 S.F.
93 5,500 S
109
5,047 S.F.
110
5,219 S.F.
111
6,148 S.F.
113
4,500 S.F.
114
4,700 S.F.
115
4,700 S.F.
116
4,700 S.F.
117
4,700 S.F.
118
4,700 S.F.
119
4,700 S.F.
120
4,700 S.F.
121
4,700 S.F.
122
4,500 S.F.
123
5,319 S.F.
124
5,144 S.F.
125
4,400 S.F.
128
4,400 S.F.
127
4,400 S.F.
126
4,400 S.F.

OUTLOT A
86,813 S.F.
.F.
112
5,320 S
129
4,400 S.F.
130
4,477 S.F.
131
4,884 S.F.
132
5,718 S.F.
133
8,981 S.F.
26 6,133 S.F.
81 6,135 S.F.
2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM

POMEGRANATE AVENUE

PEAR AVENUE
SEE SHEET 6
SEE SHEET 4

PECAN AVENUE

PERSIMMON AVENUE

PECAN AVENUE

SPRUCE AVENUE

FLORAL AVENUE
LEGEND:

BASIS OF BEARINGS:

NOTES:

SEE SHEET 9
81 108
5,728 S.F.
109
5,047 S.F.
110
5,219 S.F.
111
6 148 S F
136
6,017 S.F.
135
5,876 S.F.
7 S.F.
48 6 S.F.
149
7,250 S.F.
163
4,900 S.F.
164
4,900 S.F.
165
5,000 S.F.
102
4,722 S.F.
103
4,720 S.F.
166
4,904 S.F.
167
5,673 S.F.
168
5,463 S.F.
134
5,143 S.F.
106
6,185 S.F.
105
5,579 S.F.
104
5,778 S.F.
9 S.F.
130
4,477 S.F.
131
4,884 S.F.
132
5,718 S.F.
133
8,981 S.F.
169
6,278 S.F.
107
5,334 S.F.
162
5,684 S.F.
2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM
SEE SHEET 6
SEE SHEET 9

PERSIMMON AVENUE
106
6,185 S.F.
107
5,370 S.F.
106
6,185 S.F.
107
5,370 S.F.

DETAIL "A"
SCALE: 1" = 10'
DETAIL "B"
SCALE: 1" = 10'
LEGEND:

APRICOT AVENUE

JUNIPER AVENUE
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

NOTES:
82 6
S.F.
67 5,920 S.F.
68 F. 6,120 S.F.
2 S.F.
93 5,500 S.F.
95 8,769 S.F.
94 9,365 S.F.
96 5,550 S.F.
97 5,546 S.F.
98 5,542 S.F.
99 5,545 S.F.
100
5,534 S.F.
101
5,530 S.F.
109
5,047 S.F.
110
5,219 S.F.
111
6,148 S.F.
113
00 S.F.

OUTLOT B
5,458 S.F.
102
4,722 S.F.
103
4,720 S.F.
112
5,320 S.F.
104
5,778 S.F.
2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM
SEE SHEET 7

APRICOT AVENUE
SEE SHEET 8
1 4,480 S.F.

DETAIL "C"
SCALE: 1" = 10'
DETAIL "D"
SCALE: 1" = 10'
194
5,130 S.F.
193
4,529 S.F.

DETAIL "E"
SCALE: 1" = 10'
171
4,696 S.F.
170
8,886 S.F.

FLORAL AVENUE

JUNIPER AVENUE
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

LEGEND:NOTES:
83 84
EXHIBIT “B”

CONDITIONS OF

APPROVAL
85 86
RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 27R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SELMA,
CALIFORNIA MAKING FINDINGS AND APPROVING 2021-0002 VESTING TENTA TIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (TRACT 6244) WITH CONDITIONS OF

APPROVAL AND NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes filed a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map application to subdivide a predominantly vacant 55.1 acre site to allow development of a single-family residential subdivision ("Project"); and,
WHEREAS, the City reviewed the submitted Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (Tract 6244) and determined that the Project complies with the requirements of the Amberwood Specific Plan, City Code, and the State Subdivision Map Act; and, WHEREAS, the lots will range in size from 3,994 SF to 13,154 SF; and, WHEREAS, the Project will create 270 lots and two (2) parks for a total of 5.73 DU per net acre and 4.9 DU per gross acre which will be consistent with the proposed RM prezoning designation; and, WHEREAS, notice of the City Council's June 21, 2021, public hearing for the Project was published in The Selma Enterprise, in compliance with the City's Code and Government Code Section 65091; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the City Council's June 21, 2021 public hearing on the Project was also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the Property as required by State Law; and,
WHEREAS, at their May 24, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve Tract 6244; and, WHEREAS, the Project was reviewed under the Environmental Impact Report for the Amberwood Specific Plan (SCH 2007051003) and found to be in substantial conformance with the approved EIR; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing, as heretofore specified, and deliberated and prepared the following findings of fact for approval listed and included in this Resolution, based on the reports, evidence and verbal presentations:

1. Finding: The proposed division of land is consistent with the objectives, policies, general plan land uses, and programs adopted with the General Plan because the site is designated as Medium Low Density in the General Plan. The proposed tentative map at 5.73 DUlAC is in accordance with the density requirements of this General Plan designation.
87 2. Finding: The proposed division of land complies with requirements as to improvements and design because the site is essentially level, contains no trees, and will, once subdivided, meet the minimum design requirements for subdivisions in the neighborhood.

3. Finding: The proposed division of land complies with requirements for flood water drainage control because conditions of approval will require the subdivision to provide storm drainage infrastructure to drain into existing facilities in accordance with adopted City development standards.

4. Finding: The proposed division of the property is consistent with the General Plan land use designation because the parcels proposed supports the development of single family residential that is consistent with the Medium Low Density Residential designation.

5. Finding: That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general or specific plans because the proposed project substantially conforms to the adopted Amberwood Specific Plan.

6. Finding: The site is physically suitable for the development proposed because the proposed project is consistent with the design and improvement of a singlefamily residential project.

7. Finding: The site is physically suitable for the proposed density because the lots created by the subdivision have sufficient size, configuration, and access to satisfy the criteria applicable to the site and can physically support single-family residential uses promoted under the General Plan.

8. Finding: The design of the proposed division and improvements will not cause environmental damage or injure fish, wildlife, or their habitat because the project is located on property where people have altered the land through agricultural type uses.

9. Finding: The design of the proposed division and improvements will not cause serious public health problems because adequate measures have been applied with the conditions of approval to address potential concerns related to public health, including, but not limited to, provisions for water for domestic use and fire protection, extension of sanitary sewer facilities to ensure proper management of wastewater, installation of necessary storm drainage, construction of proper public streets and sidewalk, flood control measures, and provision for proper and orderly tim ing for construction of necessary im provements.

10. Finding: The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision because based on the proposed 88 design, the type of improvements will not conflict any easements acquired by the public for access.

II. Finding: The design of the proposed subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities because the design of the project will meet the 2017 California Green Building Code which ensures that buildings will provide for energy efficiency.

12. Finding: The effects of the proposed subdi vision on the housing needs of the region were considered and that those needs are balanced against the needs for public services and the available fiscal and environmental resources because the Tentative Subdivision Map and resulting parcels are consistent with the City's Housing Element.

13. Finding: Approval of 2021-0002 Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (Tract 6244) is exempt from further environmental review required by the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15182( c) due to the evaluation conducted under the Amberwood Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2007051003) and no events described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 have occurred related to the project.

WHEREAS, the City Council, having made its Findings for Approval, is of the opinion 2021-0002 Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (Tract 6244) should be approved subject to certain conditions of approval listed below:

1. The Tract Map and all phases thereof shall include a "Right to Farm" covenant statement acknowledged by separate recorded instrument to ensure that normal farming operations may continue adjacent and nearby agricultural uses and properties for each phase.

2. Each phase of the Tract Map shall be submitted to the City Engineer, and should include, but not be limited to, the current filing fees, closure calculations, current preliminary title report, legal descriptions, and drawings of required dedications.

3. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall submit to the City Engineer, a set of construction plans on 24" x 36" sheets with City standard title block for all required improvements (the 'Improvement Plans'). The Improvement Plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer, and shall include a site grading and drainage plan and an overall site utility plan showing locations and sizes of sewer, water, irrigation, and storm drain mains, laterals, manholes, meters, valves, hydrants, and other facilities, such as medians and stamped concrete, etc.

Plan check and inspection fees per City of Selma shall be paid with the first submittal of said Improvement Plans. All Improvement Plans for each phase shall be approved by the City and all other involved agencies prior to the release of any development permits, unless otherwise approved by the City. 89 4. The design and construction of all off-site improvements shall be in accordance with City standards and construction specifications. The design of the roads including number of lanes, median islands and landscape requirements shall conform to the Amberwood Specific Plan. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.

5. The Subdivider or Successor Interest shall comply with and be responsible for obtaining encroachment permits from the City of Selma for all work performed within the City's right-of-way.

6. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall provide a dedication for a ten (10) foot public utility easement along all frontages of all lots as approved by the City Engineer and the public utility companies. No public utility easements (electric, gas, cable, telephone, sewer, water) shall be permitted in rear lot setback areas.

7. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall comply with the requirements of Pacific, Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), AT&T, Comcast. The City shall not accept first submittals without proof that the Subdivider has paid the appropriate PG&E engineering fees and provided PG&E with a set of plans showing proposed electrical vaults and proposed sidewalk and curb grades adjacent to the vaults.

8. No above-ground transformer is permitted on the required sidewalk within the public right-of-way. All existing overhead and new utility facilities located onsite, or within the street rights-of -way adjacent to this subdivision shall be undergrounded. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall utilize screening techniques recommended pursuant to PG&E design descriptions or additional architectural features as determined by the Community Development Department as approved by the City Engineer.

9. All underground utilities installed under streets shall be backfilled, compacted, tested, and approved by the City Engineer prior to placement of any aggregate base or asphalt concrete surfacing. Easements for utilities, including water, gas, telephone, electricity, sewage, pedestrian access, fire access, storm drainage and irrigation facilities shall be provided, as required.

10. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall install streetlights to City standards at the locations designated by the City Engineer. Streetlight locations shall be shown on the utility plans submitted with the final map for approval indicating conveyance of the streetlights to the City of Selma. The design, type of metal poles and tamper proof pull boxes shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. All lighting fixtures shall have a sharp cut-off feature near the property line. Ambient light and glare outside of the project shall be minimized to residential levels.
90 11. Drainage, grading, on-site and utility improvements shall be in accordance with plans reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall be responsible for the preparation of plans. They shall construct storm drainage faci lities as deemed necessary by the City Engineer to service the project site. Said facilities must be dedicated to the City of Selma.

12. Grade differentials between lots and adjacent properties shall be adequately shown on the grading plan and shall be treated in a manner in conformance with City of Selma standards (i.e., retaining walls).

13. Individual lot grading shall comply with the current edition of the California Building Code. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall submit an updated typical lot grading diagram for review and approval by the City Engineer.

14. Design and construction of all street cross sections and required off-site improvements shall be in accordance with City specifications and as approved by the City Engineer.

15. The frontage and access on Floral A venue, a collector street, shall be developed to an ultimate width of a sixty-two (62) foot Floral Avenue public right-of-way on the north side and twenty-five (25) foot Floral avenue ROW on the south side. The street improvements consist of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and streetlights on the north side of Floral A venue in accordance with the Amberwood Specific plan.

16. All other interior streets shall be constructed to the Amberwood Specific Plan and City of Selma standards, including standard curb, gutter, park landscape strips, sidewalk, handicap ramps, street lighting and full width permanent paving (36' permanent), pavement marking and signage, pursuant to review and approval by the City Engineer.

17. All driveway approaches shall be reviewed for line-of-sight distance and approved by the City Engineer.

18. Traffic and road signs shall be installed in conformance to requirements and as approved by the City Engineer and designed to the CA MUTCD.

19. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement in accordance with the City of Selma Municipal Code prior to approval of each phase.

20. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall not install any fences, temporary or permanent, in the public right-of-way.

21. Design and structural details for the type and style of the block walls shall be submitted to the Community Development Department and the City Engineer 91 for review and approval by the City Council prior to the approval of Phase I.

Each phase will be reviewed by the Community Development Department for compliance with the original conditions for the construction, decorative construction pilaster columns and placement of the block wall. The wall facing materials shall be of decorative block such as brick or split faced concrete block with textured block accents.

22. All mechanical equipment (air conditioners or dual pack) shall be located in the attic or on the ground on foundations.

23. After all improvements have been constructed and accepted by the City, the Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall submit to the City Engineer, one blue line copy of the approved set of construction plans revised to reflect all field revisions and marked "AS-BUILT" for review and approval.

24. Upon approval of the "AS-BUILTS" by the City, the Subdivider or the Successor in Interest shall provide to the City Engineer, one (I) reproducible and one (I) copy of the "AS-BUILTS", and one (1) copy on diskette, CD or similar digital storage media that is compatible with Auto CAD.

25. The Subdivider or the Successor in Interest shall provide the City Engineer with original Improvement Plans and Auto CAD files of the Final Map, Improvement Plans, and all drawings prepared on Auto CAD.

26. The Subdivider or the Successor in Interest shall contact the Regional Water Quality Board and comply with all requirements, pay all applicable fees required, obtain any required NPDES permit and implement Best Available Technology Economically Achievable and Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology to reduce or eliminate storm water pollution for each phase.

27. The Subdivider or the Successor in Interest shall provide a covenant for the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District. The Subdivider or the Successor in Interest acknowledges and agrees that such request serves as a petition pursuant to California State Proposition 218 and no further election will be required for the establishment of the initial assessment. The assessment for each lot must be obtained from the City for the tax year following the recordation of the Final Map. The estimated annual assessment is subject to limited annual adjustments. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall notify all potential lot buyers before they actually purchase a lot, that this tract is a part of a Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District and shall inform potential buyers of the assessment amount. Said notification shall, be in a manner approved by the City.

The Subdivider or the Successor in Interest shall supply all necessary assessment diagrams and other pertinent materials for the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District annually until the year subsequent of recording of the Final Tract Map and assignment of new assessor's parcel numbers by the county. 92 28. Monuments as described in Condition No. 29 shall be set as required by City standards and shall be shown on the Final Map.

29. The Subdivider or the Successor in Interest shall install all major street monumentation and section comer monumentation within the limits of the project work in accordance with City standards prior to final acceptance of the project. Monumentation at the street center line intersections shall conform to City Standards drawing No. 0-21. Any existing section comer or property comer monuments damaged by this development shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A licensed land surveyor or civil engineer licensed to perform land surveying shall certity the placement of all required monumentation prior to final acceptance. Within five (5) days after the final setting of all monuments, the engineer or surveyor shall give written notice to the City Engineer that the final monuments have been set. Upon payment to the engineer or surveyor for setting the final monuments, the applicant shall present to the City Engineer evidence of the payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor.

30. The Subdivider or the Successor in Interest is to work with the City Engineer to identifY the scope of the offsite improvements that will be required with this development, the mitigations that were outlined in the Traffic impact study prepared by RD Engineering dated May 2020 will be the basis of the requirements.

31. The Subdivider or Successor in Interest shall extend the water main east on Floral from Dockery to Street L and north along Street L from Floral to the end of the property.

32. All Development and construction activities shall comply with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District's (SJVAPCD) applicable rules and regulations.

33. The Subdivider or the Successor in Interest shall implement SJVAPCD's applicable mitigation requirements as specified in the Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts.

34. The Subdivider or the Successor in Interest shall provide fencing for buffers along any edges of Amberwood that border agricultural uses per Figure 4-10, Walls and Fences in the Amberwood Specific Plan.

35. The Developer shall provide outdoor electrical outlets to facilitate use of electrical lawn and garden maintenance equipment, and a natural gas outlet option for outdoor barbecues.

36. All Development shall be built in compliance with current adopted City of Selma Fire Codes and Amendments.
93 37. All Development shall be built in compliance with current adopted City of Selma Building Codes and Amendments.

38. All Development shall be subject to development impact fees that are applicable.

39. The developer shall be responsible for payment of all applicable City impact fees.

40. The developer shall be responsible for payment of any outstanding invoices prior to issuance of building permits.

41. The developer shall be responsible for coordination and payment of all school impact fees directly to the school districts. The developer shall submit proof of payment prior to issuance of building permits.

42. All landscaping, fences, and walls shall be maintained, and the premises shall be kept free of weeds, trash, and other debris.

43. Except as amended herein, or by reference, all development shall be In accordance with the Amberwood Specific Plan.

44. The Property Owner, Subdivider or the Successor in Interest shall, at their sole expense, defend, with counsel selected by the City, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Selma, its agents, officers, directors and employees, from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses, or expenses of every type and description, including but not limited to payment of attorneys' fees and costs, by reason of, or arising out of, this development approval. The obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall include but is not limited to any action to arbitrate, attack, review, set aside, void or annul this development approval on any grounds whatsoever. The City of Selma shall promptly notify the developer of any such claim, action, or proceeding.

45. The Tentative Subdivision Map approval shall be valid for a period of two (2) years. If a final map is not filed and approved prior to the end of the two-year life of the Tentative Subdivision Map approval, the approval shall expire and become null and void. A request to extend the Tentative Subdivision Map approval period may be filed with the City Clerk. The request shall be filed at least 30 days prior to the expiration date and shall be processed in accordance with the procedures established by the Selma Municipal Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Selma City Council hereby takes the following actions:

I. The above findings are supported by the record and presentation to the City Council

2. The above facts are true and correct.
94 3. The City Council hereby approves Application No. 2021-0002 Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (Tract 6244) subject to Findings for Approval, Conditions of Approval, and Notice of Exemption listed above and made a part ofthis Resolution.

The foregoing Resolution No. 2021-_=-27:...:;R=-=--_is hereby approved this 21 51 day of June 2021 , by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: TRUJILLO, MENDOZA-NAVARjIO, GUERjIA, eRO, ROBERTSON NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
APPROVED:
cott Robertson, Mayor
City of Selma
ATTEST:
ik t£p- City of Selma
95 96
EXHIBIT “C”

MITIGATION MEASURES
(Findings for Approval)
97 98

ADDENDUM

TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

CITY OF SELMA
The Amberwood Specific Plan
Approved EIR (SCH #2007051003)
Development Agreement
JANUARY 2025
99 ADDENDUM
to the
Environmental Impact Report
for the Amberwood Specific Plan
Approved Final EIR (SCH #2007051003)
Development Agreement
City of Selma
1710 Tucker Street
Selma, CA 93662
January 2025
100
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page i
Table of Contents
Introduction & Overview .................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 - Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1-1

1.1.1 - Approved Project.....................................................................................................................1-1

1.2 - Project Overview........................................................................................................................................1-3

1.2.1 - Proposed Modified Project..................................................................................................1-3

1.3 - Contact Information..................................................................................................................................1-3

1.4 - Addendum Organization.........................................................................................................................1-4

1.5 - Addendum Scope of Environmental Review..................................................................................1-4

1.6 - Basis for an EIR Addendum ...................................................................................................................1-5

1.7 - Evaluation of Alternatives ......................................................................................................................1-6

1.8 - Adoption and Availability of an Addendum....................................................................................1-7

1.9 - Regulation Incorporated by Reference.............................................................................................1-7 Proposed Modified Project Description........................................................................ 2-1

2.1 - Introduction and Background ..............................................................................................................2-1

2.1.1 - Proposed Modified Project Location ...............................................................................2-1

2.1.2 - Existing Land Uses...................................................................................................................2-1

2.1.3 - Existing Land Use Designations.........................................................................................2-1

2.2 - Proposed Modified Project Characteristics ....................................................................................2-5

2.3 - Entitlements Required.............................................................................................................................2-5 Environmental Analysis ...................................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 - Aesthetics.......................................................................................................................................................3-1

3.1.1 - Setting ...........................................................................................................................................3-1

3.1.2 - Impact Analysis.........................................................................................................................3-1

3.2 - Agriculture ....................................................................................................................................................3-5

3.2.1 - Setting ...........................................................................................................................................3-5

3.2.2 - Impact Analysis.........................................................................................................................3-5

3.3 - Air Quality...................................................................................................................................................3-10

3.3.1 - Setting ........................................................................................................................................3-10

3.3.2 - Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................3-10

3.4 - Biological Resources ..............................................................................................................................3-18

3.4.1 - Setting ........................................................................................................................................3-18

3.4.2 - Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................3-18

3.5 - Cultural Resources..................................................................................................................................3-23

3.5.1 - Setting ........................................................................................................................................3-23

3.5.2 - Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................3-23

3.6 - Geology and Soils.....................................................................................................................................3-26

3.6.1 - Setting ........................................................................................................................................3-26 101

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page ii

3.6.2 - Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................3-26

3.7 - Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................................................3-31

3.7.1 - Setting ........................................................................................................................................3-31

3.7.2 - Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................3-31

3.8 - Land Use and Planning..........................................................................................................................3-39

3.8.1 - Setting ........................................................................................................................................3-39

3.8.2 - Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................3-39

3.9 - Noise .............................................................................................................................................................3-43

3.9.1 - Setting ........................................................................................................................................3-43

3.9.2 - Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................3-43

3.10 - Population and Housing ....................................................................................................................3-49

3.10.1 - Setting .....................................................................................................................................3-49

3.10.2 - Impact Analysis...................................................................................................................3-49

3.11 - Public Services .......................................................................................................................................3-52

3.11.1 - Setting .....................................................................................................................................3-52

3.11.2 - Impact Analysis...................................................................................................................3-52

3.12 - Transportation and Traffic...............................................................................................................3-57

3.12.1 - Setting .....................................................................................................................................3-57

3.12.2 - Impact Analysis...................................................................................................................3-57

3.13 - Utilities......................................................................................................................................................3-66

3.13.1 - Setting .....................................................................................................................................3-66

3.13.2 - Impact Analysis...................................................................................................................3-66 Irreversible Changes and Unavoidable Impacts ........................................................ 4-1

4.1 - Significant Environmental Impacts which Cannot be Avoided..............................................4-1

4.2 - Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes..........................................................................4-3 Growth-Inducing Project Impacts ................................................................................... 5-1 List of Preparers..................................................................................................................... 6-1 List of Figures
Figure 1-1 Amberwood Specific Plan ..........................................................................................................1-2 Figure 2-1 Regional Location ..........................................................................................................................2-2 Figure 2-2 Local Vicinity ...................................................................................................................................2-3 Figure 2-3 Amberwood Land Use Plan .......................................................................................................2-4 List of Tables
Table 3-1 Intersections, Roadway Segments, and Bridges Requiring Future Traffic Impact Study .......................................................................................................................................................................3-60

102

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page iii
Appendices:

Appendix A- Amberwood Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report Appendix B- Amberwood Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Program 103
Introduction & Overview

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 1-1

INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW

1.1 - Introduction

1.1.1 - APPROVED PROJECT
As Lead Agency, the City of Selma (City) prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Amberwood Specific Plan (referred to herein as the “approved project”), which evaluated a mixed-use residential and commercial development project for a 690.7-acre project site located in the northeastern portion of the Selma Sphere of influence, east of Orange Avenue, and between Manning Avenue and Floral Avenue (Figure 1-1). The original EIR (SCH#2007051003) and Final EIR prepared by Michael Gaston and Associates were certified by the City Council on November 2, 2015, which are included in Appendix A of this document. The adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is included in Appendix B.

The approved project consists of the following:
• A 7.5-acre neighborhood commercial site.
• A 10.8-acre elementary school.
• A 3-acre site for a new public safety facility (police or fire). • 54.3 acres of public park areas.
• 15.2 acres for private park areas.
• 122.9 acres for low-density residential uses.
• 258.3 areas for medium low-density residential uses.
• 108.1 acres for medium-density residential uses.
• 80.4 acres for public and private streets.

A total of 2,558 detached dwelling units were planned for the project, along with 131,200 square feet of neighborhood commercial uses. The new elementary school will accommodate up to approximately 700 students. A new community center building will be located within the linear park area. The detached dwelling units will be constructed on 12 individual lot types, which will range in minimum lot sizes from 3,480 square feet to 8,450 square feet.

Both single-story and two-story homes are anticipated. No rental apartment units will be constructed within Amberwood. A primary feature of the Amberwood project will be a large linear park to be located within the central portion of the project area. The linear park will include a meandering creek for aesthetics, aquifer recharge, and storm drainage purposes.

Assuming a population density of approximately 3.5 persons per household, the Amberwood project could contain a population of approximately 8,953 persons at full buildout.

The approved project included local private streets to be owned and maintained by the Amberwood Homeowners Association. Arterial streets and collector streets would be dedicated to the City, who would be responsible for maintenance of these streets. Individual neighborhoods within Amberwood may be gated for security purposes at the discretion of the developer.
104
Introduction & Overview

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 1-2
Figure 1-1
Amberwood Specific Plan
105
Introduction & Overview

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 1-3
The Amberwood Specific Plan (Specific Plan) contains detailed design guidelines and development regulations. The design guidelines will pertain to the following items:
• Walls and Fences
• Neighborhood Entryways
• Street and Park Furniture
• Street Signs and Boat Docks
• Monuments and Signage
• Street Lighting and Utilities
• Pedestrian Walks and Bike Paths
• Parks and Open Space
• Landscaping
The development regulations will control items such as building height, setbacks, lot coverage, and off-street parking requirements. Activities to be allowed on the private lakes, which are an alternative to the project, will include boating (non-powered boats only such as sailboats and rowboats), and fishing. Swimming will not be allowed. It is anticipated that the lakes will be stocked with an appropriate species of fish. Allowable activities on the private lakes will be controlled and enforced by the Amberwood Homeowners Association.

1.2 - Project Overview

1.2.1 - PROPOSED MODIFIED PROJECT
The proposed changes to the approved project are referred to herein as the “proposed modified project” “modified project” or “proposed project modifications.” The modified project entitlements include the consideration of a Development Agreement between the developer/proponent and the City. As proposed, the modified project would also revise a mitigation measure that intended that all local streets within Amberwood shall be private streets and be maintained by the Amberwood Homeowners’ Association The updated mitigation measure allows for local streets to be public streets, with their road maintenance expenses addressed through an assessment or financing district, such as a Community Facilities District (CFD) or Landscaping, Lighting, and Maintenance District (LLMD). No other changes or revisions to the Amberwood Specific Plan are proposed.

1.3 - Contact Information
The Lead Agency contact is:

City of Selma
Jerome Keene, Deputy City Manager
1710 Tucker Street
Selma, California 93662
Phone: (559) 891-2200
[email protected]
106
Introduction & Overview

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 1-4
The Project Proponent contact is:

Lennar Homes of California
Walter Diamond
8080 N. Palm Avenue
Fresno, California 93711
Phone: (559) 488-9548

1.4 - Addendum Organization
This document is organized as follows pursuant to the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines:
• Chapter 1, Introduction and Overview, describes the background of the proposed modified project; explains the rationale for preparing an Addendum to the EIR as the appropriate form of environmental review pursuant to CEQA; and explains the purpose, scope, and content of the Addendum.
• Chapter 2, Proposed Modified Project Description, describes the location and details of the proposed modified project.
• Chapter 3, Environmental Analysis, evaluates whether the proposed modifications to the approved project would result in new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts compared with the impacts disclosed in the certified EIR. • Chapter 4, Irreversible Changes and Unavoidable Impacts, describes the unavoidable impacts of the proposed modified project.
• Chapter 5, Growth-Inducing Project Impacts, describes the growth inducement impacts of the proposed modified project.
• Chapter 6, References, lists the documents and individuals consulted during the preparation of the Addendum.

1.5 - Addendum Scope of Environmental Review
This Addendum evaluates whether the proposed modifications to the approved project (resulting in the modified proposed project) would result in new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts compared to the impacts disclosed in the certified EIR.

The certified EIR assessed the environmental impacts of the Amberwood Specific Plan, a mixed-use residential and commercial development project for a 690.7-acre project site located in the northeastern portion of the Selma Sphere of influence, east of Orange Avenue, and between Manning Avenue and Floral Avenue.

As discussed in the certified EIR, the approved project was determined to have “no impact” with regard to two environmental resource topic areas:
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• Mineral Resources
107
Introduction & Overview

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 1-5
Since the proposed modified project would have the same type of development located within the vicinity of the original project site, the impacts of the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to these impact thresholds. These impact thresholds will not be discussed in the Addendum EIR.

The certified EIR established that, with mitigation incorporated, the approved project would result in less than significant impacts related to the following environmental impact areas:
• Geology and Soils
• Land Use and Planning
• Noise
The certified EIR established that the approved project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts with regard to the following environmental impact areas:
• Permanent loss of prime agricultural land from conversion to urban uses. • Increased traffic and the reduction in levels of service (LOS) at key intersections. • Increased air pollution and degraded air quality, primarily from motor vehicles. • Cumulative unavoidable significant impacts to groundwater overdraft. • Increases in ambient noise levels in the project area and off-site, primarily from increased motor vehicle traffic.
• Hydrology impacts from stormwater runoff, and pumping of groundwater for potable drinking water and landscaping irrigation uses.
• Unavoidable impacts to the Selma Unified School District, and the need for a new elementary school.
• Significant and unavoidable additional demands for electricity and natural gas utilities.
• Significant and unavoidable increases in the population of the City of Selma from the construction and occupancy of an additional 2,558 dwelling units. • Significant and unavoidable impacts to public safety services (Police and Fire) from increased calls for service.
• Significant and unavoidable increases in solid waste generation.

This Addendum will address changes resulting from implementation of the proposed modified project on each of the environmental resource areas previously analyzed in the certified EIR, as well as changes in the circumstances under which the project, as modified, will be undertaken. It will examine whether there is any new information of substantial importance not known with the exercise of reasonable diligence when the EIR was certified that concerns the items detailed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3), detailed below.

1.6 - Basis for an EIR Addendum
An agency may prepare an addendum to a certified EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 that states, in pertinent part, that “if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent 108
Introduction & Overview

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 1-6
EIR have occurred.” Section 15162 states that a subsequent EIR is required if any of the following conditions exist:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR … due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR … due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete… shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR.
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR.
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

Based on the evaluation provided in this Addendum, no new significant impacts would occur as a result of the proposed modified project, nor would there be any substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant environmental impact. In addition, no new information of substantial importance shows that mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously found not to be feasible or that are considerably different from those analyzed in the certified EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment alternative. Therefore, none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines has occurred. For this reason, an addendum is an appropriate document to comply with CEQA requirements for the proposed modified project.

1.7 - Evaluation of Alternatives
CEQA requires a comparative evaluation of a proposed project and alternatives to the proposed project, including the “No Project” alternative. The certified EIR addressed a 109
Introduction & Overview

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 1-7
reasonable range of alternatives for the approved project. There is no new information indicating that an alternative that was previously rejected as infeasible is, in fact, feasible or that a considerably different alternative than those previously studied would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment.

1.8 - Adoption and Availability of an Addendum
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(c), an addendum to an EIR need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the certified EIR. The decision-making body shall consider the Addendum with the certified EIR prior to making a decision on the project per CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(d). Although not required, this Addendum is available for public review at the City of Selma Planning Department, 1710 Tucker Street, Selma, California 93662.

1.9 - Regulation Incorporated by Reference
The following regulations are incorporated into this Addendum by reference. Other applicable federal, State, and regional regulations are referenced throughout this document:
• City of Selma General Plan
• City of Selma General Plan Environmental Impact Report • City of Selma Development Standards
• Amberwood Specific Plan
• City of Selma Zoning Ordinance
• City of Selma Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR Housing Element • California Building Code - Title 24 regulations
110
Proposed Modified Project Description

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 2-1

PROPOSED MODIFIED PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 - Introduction and Background
This chapter of the Addendum describes the modifications to the approved project that have been proposed by the project proponent.

2.1.1 - PROPOSED MODIFIED PROJECT LOCATION
The regional setting for the proposed modified project would be unchanged from the approved project. Fresno County is located in the approximate center of the State of California. Fresno County is bordered by San Benito, Merced, Madera, Mono, Inyo, Tulare, Kings, and Monterey Counties (Figure 2-1). The City and the modified project site are situated in the central San Joaquin Valley, at an elevation of approximately 310 feet above sea level. The project site topography slopes gradually from north to south with the elevation being approximately 320 feet in the northern portion of the site and falling to approximately 310 feet at the southern end of the site.

The proposed modified project site is partially located within the existing city limits of the City of Selma and within unincorporated Fresno County. The City is located in Fresno County, approximately 17 miles south of Fresno, three miles north of Kingsburg, and four miles south of Fowler (Figure 2-2).

2.1.2 - EXISTING LAND USES
Similar to the approved project, the proposed modified project site has been historically used for agriculture. Currently, it contains orchards, row crops, and undeveloped land.

The land uses surrounding the approved and modified project site consist of agricultural and residential development. Additionally, immediately to the east of the project site, there is Rudd Avenue, followed by a vacant lot and a single-family residential development further east.

2.1.3 - EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
The approved project site has existing land use designations that include Low Density, Medium Density, Medium High Density, Community Commercial, Elementary School, Community Center, Lake Parks/Open Space, and Commercial Residential Mixed-Use Overlay (Figure 2-3).
111
Proposed Modified Project Description

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 2-2
Figure 2-1
Regional Location
112
Proposed Modified Project Description

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 2-3
Figure 2-2
Local Vicinity
113
Proposed Modified Project Description
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 2-4
Figure 2-3
Amberwood Land Use Plan
114
Proposed Modified Project Description

Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 2-5

2.2 - Proposed Modified Project Characteristics
The proposed modified project would result in the approval of a Development Agreement between the City of Selma, Lennar Homes of California, LLC, and BAK Limited, LLC. As part of the Development Agreement, some local streets will be established as public and dedicated to the City for maintenance purposes.

The construction activities for the proposed modified project would be similar to the activities described in the certified Final EIR. Similar to the approved project, the modified project would require minimized grading due to the relative level of gently sloping topography on the project site. The amount and duration of construction activities for the proposed modified project would be similar to those analyzed for the approved project in the certified Final EIR. The operation and maintenance activities of the proposed modified project would be similar to the activities analyzed for the approved project in the certified Final EIR.

2.3 - Entitlements Required
The discretionary approvals required for the implementation of the proposed modified project include:
• Approval of a Development Agreement
• Adoption of the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program • Adoption of the Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR 115
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-1

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
This Addendum evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts compared to the impacts disclosed in the certified EIR. The environmental analysis provided in this section describes the information that was considered in evaluating the questions contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appendix G Guidelines Checklist. Since certification of the Final EIR for the approved project, the CEQA Appendix G Guidelines have been revised to include an analysis of energy, greenhouse gas emissions, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire. These new resource sections have been incorporated into this Addendum, consistent with the CEQA Appendix G Guidelines Checklist. The information used in this evaluation includes the certified EIR, the proposed modified project description, technical studies, literature reviews, and field reconnaissance.

The proposed modified project would incorporate and implement all mitigation measures identified in the certified EIR, as noted below. Specific mitigation measures relevant to a particular impact of the proposed modified project are cited in the same manner as in the EIR, and the associated Mitigation Measure Monitoring Program (MMRP) adopted in conjunction with the Amberwood Specific Plan approvals. The Amberwood EIR and MMRP can be found herein as Appendix A and Appendix B, respectively.

3.1 - Aesthetics
This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.1.1 - SETTING
The visual setting of the proposed modified project and its surrounding area is similar to that of the approved project site. The project site has been historically used for agriculture. Lands in the vicinity of the proposed modified project area are generally similar to those described in the certified EIR, consisting of agriculture and residential development. There are no sensitive receptors or aesthetic resources, such as scenic vistas, scenic highways, trails, or parkland, in the area immediately surrounding the project site.

3.1.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts to aesthetics not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. As discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1.5 Addendum Scope of Environmental Review of this Addendum, the approved project was determined to have no impact with regard to the impact thresholds listed below for the environmental topic aesthetics. Since the proposed modified project would have the same type of single-family residential development located within the vicinity of the original project site, the impacts of the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to the following 116
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-2
impact thresholds as stated in the CEQA Checklist. Therefore, the following is not further analyzed for the proposed modified project in this Addendum:
• Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? • Would the project substantially damage scenic resources in a State scenic highway? • Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the project site or its surroundings?
The following Mitigation was adopted for the approved project:
• Prepare a lighting intensity diagram and lighting improvement plans for City approval.
• Limit illumination in commercial parking lots to a uniform of 1.0 foot-candle. • Require the developer to adhere to the design guidelines as contained in the Amberwood Specific Plan.
• Require outside highly directional lighting fixtures and proper shielding on all outdoor lighting to minimize the transmission of light off-site.

The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts to aesthetics that were identified in the certified EIR as potentially significant impacts. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
• Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
The certified EIR determined that the development of the 2,558 homes and commercial uses could create a substantial source of new light and glare due to street lighting, parking lot lighting, and normal lighting associated with residential dwellings. Mitigation was approved for the original project, as noted above. With these mitigation measures, new environmental effects were deemed to be less than significant.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and, therefore, would be subject to the approved Mitigation Measures Aesthetics 1-4.

There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a 117
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-3
substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described agricultural and forest resource impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such aesthetics and visual resources impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a less than significant impact.

Cumulative Impact
The Amberwood Specific Plan was developed during the same time period as the updated 2035 General Plan. Therefore, the Amberwood Specific Plan Land Uses and development densities were included in the updated 2035 General Plan Land Use Element, and they were also evaluated and analyzed in the 2035 General Plan Program EIR. The cumulative impacts from the development of the approved Project were therefore considered in the Cumulative Environmental Impact Analysis for the 2035 Updated General Plan. The certified project EIR used the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR as a tiering environmental document with regard to the evaluation of cumulative impacts. The General Plan Projection Method was used for the Cumulative Impacts Analysis contained within the project’s certified EIR, and the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR is, therefore, the major reference document for the information contained herein.

The proposed project modifications would not generate substantially more adverse cumulative impacts to aesthetics and visual resources than those disclosed in the certified EIR and would be mitigated to the maximum extent practicable by the incorporation of all feasible and applicable mitigation measures.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.
118
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-4

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a less than significant cumulative impact.
119
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-5

3.2 - Agriculture
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project to agricultural and forest resources require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.

This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.2.1 - SETTING
The agricultural setting of the proposed modified project and its surrounding area is similar to that of the approved project site. The project site has been historically used for agriculture.

Lands in the vicinity of the proposed modified project area are generally similar to those described in the certified EIR, consisting of agriculture and residential development. The project site does not contain any forestry resources, and there are no forestry resources in the surrounding area; therefore, only agricultural resources are addressed in this analysis.

The project site has been historically used for agriculture. The visual setting of the proposed modified project and its surrounding area is substantially the same as that of the approved project site. Lands in the vicinity of the proposed modified project area are generally the same as those described in the certified EIR. The land uses surrounding the project site consist of agricultural and residential.

The approved project site was designated as Prime by the California Department of Conservation. Additionally, the approved project site was not within the Williamson Act contracting program at the time of EIR certification and is not currently under a Williamson Act contract.

3.2.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts to agricultural resources not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project.

The following Mitigation was adopted for the approved project:
• The City shall require adequate buffers between the project site and adjacent agricultural lands. In addition, adequate setbacks and a seven-foot-high perimeter masonry wall shall be provided.
• The City shall use urban development boundaries and growth phasing policies to delay the conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses in areas adjacent to the project site.
• The City shall encourage the developer to actively farm land within the project site until phasing and housing market conditions determine that agricultural land should be converted to urban uses.
120
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-6
• Land located within the project site but outside of the sphere of influence shall remain zoned County AE-20 until such time as the City SOI is revised by LAFCO, and the land is pre-zoned and annexed into the City.
• The City shall require the developer to record right-to-farm covenants in order to place future owners on notice regarding the potential environmental impacts of adjacent area farming operations and as a notice of the right of area farmers to continue their farm operations.

The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts to agricultural resources that were identified in the certified EIR as potentially significant impacts. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
• Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? The 690-acre approved project site was designated as Prime Farmland under the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP). The proposed modified project would not result in any additional conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance and would not change the finding in the certified EIR of significant and unavoidable.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and, therefore, would be subject to the approved Mitigation Measures Agricultural Resources 1-5.

There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described agricultural and forest resource impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such agricultural and forest resource impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR. 121
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-7

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a significant and unavoidable impact.
• Would the project conflict with the existing zoning for agricultural use or an existing Williamson Act contract?
The approved project site was not within the Williamson Act contracting program at the time of EIR certification and is not currently under a Williamson Act contract. However, the approved project was zoned by Fresno County for agricultural use (County AE-20 zoning) and was considered a significant and unavoidable impact.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and, therefore, would not further conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use beyond what was previously analyzed.

There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described agricultural and forest resource impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such agricultural and forest resource impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR. The proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact, as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a significant and unavoidable impact.
122
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-8
• Would the project result in change in the existing environment that, due to the project site location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use? Based on the potential for conversion of other farmlands to urban uses, the certified EIR concluded that the impact is significant and unavoidable.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and, therefore, would not increase the amount of farmland conversion beyond what was previously analyzed.

There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described agricultural and forest resource impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such agricultural and forest resource impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a significant and unavoidable impact.

Cumulative Impact
The certified EIR determined the approved project’s cumulative impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. The proposed modified project would implement the mitigation measures above and would not result in a change to the conclusions regarding agriculture in the certified EIR.

The proposed project modifications would not generate substantially more adverse cumulative impacts to agricultural resources than those disclosed in the certified EIR and would be mitigated to the maximum extent practicable by the incorporation of all feasible and applicable mitigation measures.
123
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-9

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact.
124
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-10

3.3 - Air Quality
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project to air quality resources require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.3.1 - SETTING
The air quality setting of the proposed modified project and its surrounding area are the same as that of the approved project site. The project site is located within the Fresno County portion of the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB or Basin). Fresno County is included among the eight counties that comprise the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). The SJVAPCD acts as the regulatory agency for air pollution control in the Basin and is the local agency empowered to regulate air pollutant emissions for the project site and surrounding area.

3.3.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to air quality not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. As discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1.5 Addendum Scope of Environmental Review of this Addendum, in the certified EIR, the approved project was determined to have no impact with regard to the impact thresholds listed below for the environmental topic of air quality. Since the proposed modified project would have the same type of development located within the approved project site, the impacts of the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to the following impact thresholds as stated in the CEQA Checklist. Therefore, the following is not further analyzed for the proposed modified project in this Addendum:
• Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? • Would the project create objectionable odors that affect a substantial number of people?
The following Mitigation Measures were adopted for the approved project:

1. Prior to receiving an occupancy permit, each non-residential facility in the project shall install bicycle parking facilities within 50 feet of the main entrances. A minimum of one bicycle parking space for each 20 vehicle spaces shall be installed.

2. Prior to occupancy, shower, and locker facilities shall be installed in commercial buildings to encourage employees to bike and/or walk to work. One shower and three lockers for each of the 25 employees are considered adequate.

3. The project developer shall install display cases or kiosks displaying transportation information in prominent areas accessible to employees, residents, and visitors. 125
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-11
Display locations include parking lots and garages, the elementary school, the commercial shopping center, and the community center.

4. Automated lights and thermal controls shall be installed in all non-residential facilities.

5. Daylight systems shall be installed in all non-residential buildings, including skylights, light shelves, and interior transom windows.

6. The project architect shall design, and the builder shall install roofing technologies such as high albedo and low emissive roofs, EPA "Energy Star" approved roofing materials, and "Green Roof" and LEED technology systems.

7. Parking lots shall be designed to include clearly marked and shaded walkways between public transit facilities, adjacent sidewalks, and commercial building entrances.

8. "Cool Paving" shall be installed to the maximum extent feasible.

9. Proposed commercial land uses that have the potential to emit Toxic Air Emissions shall be located as far away as feasibly possible from existing and proposed sensitive receptors (homes, schools, churches) in accordance with the ARB Air Quality and Land Use Planning Handbook. Specifically, the architect shall design an adequate buffer between any dry-cleaning operation and any sensitive receptors, and between any gasoline dispensing facility and any sensitive receptors.

10. Prior to the development of the on-site wastewater treatment plant, the developer shall consult with the SJVAPCD small business assistance office to determine air permit issues and to develop an Odor Mitigation Plan, if one is required. The following items shall be addressed in the Odor Mitigation Plan.
i) The WWTP must be appropriately sized and engineered to serve the proposed volume of wastewater generated by the project.
ii) The WWTP facilities must incorporate odor control measures in order to minimize potential odor impacts to surrounding residences. iii) The WWTP shallbe constructed on a selected site that minimizes potential exposure of sensitive receptors to odors.

11. The project shall reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste, including, but not limited to soils, vegetation, concrete, lumber, asphalt, metal, and cardboard.

12. The project shall provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables, and adequate recycling containers located in areas accessible to the public. 126
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-12
The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts to Air Quality that were identified in the certified EIR as potentially significant impacts. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
• Would the project conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
The certified EIR included mitigation measures for PM10 and PM2.5 and required the project to comply with all the applicable rules and regulations of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (APCD) for implementation of all adopted air quality plans. Based on the mitigation, the certified EIR concluded that the impact is less than significant with mitigation.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and would be required to comply with the same APCD rules as the approved project and, therefore, would be subject to the approved Mitigation Measures Air Quality 1-12.

There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described air quality impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such air quality impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a less than significant with mitigation impact.
• Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?
127
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-13
The certified EIR concluded that the approved project could contribute substantially to ozone concentrations and carbon monoxide concentrations in the project area due to the significant level of new vehicle traffic generated with the full buildout of the project.

Based on the mitigation, the certified EIR concluded that even with mitigation, the impact is significant and unavoidable.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and would also contribute substantially to ozone and carbon monoxide concentrations. However, it should be noted that Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Section 2449 et seq., imposes construction equipment idling restrictions. Compliance with Title 13 would help to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants, as well as reduce unnecessary fuel consumption during the construction of the modified project.

There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a significant and unavoidable with mitigation impact.
• Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard?
The certified EIR concluded that the approved project could contribute to significant increases in ozone levels and carbon monoxide levels in the region due to the significant increase in project-related traffic. The certified EIR concluded that even with mitigation, the impact is significant and unavoidable.
128
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-14
The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and would also contribute to ozone and carbon monoxide concentrations.

However, as previously noted, Title 13 imposes construction equipment idling restrictions that would reduce emissions of criteria pollutants and Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions during construction of the modified project. With recent changes in California building code Title 24, all new residential construction will include a PV solar electrical system that will provide an emissions-free source of electricity, thus offsetting GHG emissions that would be generated from facilities producing electricity from nonrenewable resources (e.g., coal or natural gas). This use of a renewable electrical energy system would actually decrease the GHG impacts of the proposed modified project.

There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a significant and unavoidable with mitigation impact.
• Will the project generate Greenhouse Gas Emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
The certified EIR concluded that the approved project would develop new commercial, residential, institutional (school), and recreational uses on a currently undeveloped site, and therefore the project would result in a net increase in GHG emissions above existing levels.

However, the modified project incorporates a number of current design features that would minimize GHG emissions. Compliance with Title 13 would help to reduce GHG emissions during project construction. Compliance with Title 24 and the use of a PV solar electrical system will provide an emissions-free source of electricity, thus offsetting GHG emissions that would be generated from facilities producing electricity from nonrenewable resources. 129
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-15
With implementation of the pertinent State and local regulations and codes, the proposed modified project would result in the more efficient consumption of transportation fuels and reduce the generation of criteria pollutants and GHG emissions. The impacts of the modified project would be reduced to less than significant levels. Additionally, the project provides local retail and grocery shopping opportunities to the workers and residents in the project vicinity. The proposed modified project also incorporates energy efficiency through water efficiency (low flow faucets and toilets, drip irrigation, the use of native, drought-tolerant landscaping) and waste recycling.

With implementation of project design features and pertinent regulations, GHG emissions are reduced by 29.6 percent. These reductions comply with the APCD threshold of a 29 percent reduction in emissions. Impacts would be less than significant based on this criterion, and no mitigation measures are therefore required.

There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described air quality and GHG impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such air quality and GHG impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.
• Will the project conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of any agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the Emissions of Greenhouse Gases? As previously noted, Title 13 imposes construction equipment idling restrictions that would reduce emissions of criteria pollutants and GHG during construction. In addition, the project is being designed to minimize energy use, further minimizing direct and indirect GHG emissions from project operations with the use of PV solar energy in each residence. The proposed modified project would not significantly hinder or delay the ability of the State of California to meet the reduction targets contained in AB 32, or conflict with implementation 130
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-16
of the ARB Scoping Plan, because the proposed project would generate less than significant levels of Greenhouse Gases, and the project would therefore be consistent with the goals of the ARB Scoping Plan through implementation of the design measures that reduce energy consumption, water consumption, and that encourage alternative forms of transportation.

There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described agricultural and forest resource impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such agricultural and forest resource impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant with mitigation.

Cumulative Impact
The certified EIR discussed that Cumulative Air Quality Impacts were considered in terms of the various land uses proposed under the 2035 General Plan Update (which includes Amberwood), and the traffic projections generated by the traffic model. Because of the significant air quality issues within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, including Ozone, ROG, and particulate matter, implementation of the 2035 General Plan, including the construction of the approved Project, will result in a significant, unavoidable, and cumulatively considerable air quality impact to the Selma area and the Fresno County region.

The proposed modified project would implement mitigation measures and would not result in a change to the conclusions regarding cumulative air quality impacts in the certified EIR.

The proposed project modifications would not generate substantially more adverse cumulative impacts to air quality than those disclosed in the certified EIR and would be mitigated to the maximum extent practicable by the incorporation of all feasible and applicable mitigation measures.
131
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-17

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modified project does not change the finding in the certified EIR of significant and unavoidable cumulative impact.
132
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-18

3.4 - Biological Resources
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project on biological resources require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.4.1 - SETTING
The certified EIR discussed regulation that is normally applicable to biological resources, followed by a description of the physical setting of both the site and surrounding lands. The EIR included a comprehensive analysis of special-status and sensitive species, local habitats and vegetation communities, and jurisdictional waters over the approved project site.

Portions of the modified project site are currently under cultivation, and the remaining area is undeveloped, disturbed land. Lands in the vicinity of the proposed modified project area are generally the same as those described in the certified EIR. The land uses surrounding the project site consist of agricultural and residential.

3.4.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts to biological resources not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. As discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1.5 Addendum Scope of Environmental Review of this Addendum, the certified EIR of the approved project was determined to have no impact with regard to the impact thresholds listed below for the environmental topic of biological resources. Since the proposed modified project would have the same type of development located within the approved project site, the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to the following impact thresholds, as stated in the CEQA Checklist. Therefore, the following is not further analyzed for the proposed modified project in this Addendum:
• Would the project result in a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS?
• Would the project result in a substantial adverse impact on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act? • Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with an established resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites?
• Would the project conflict with provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or approved plan local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan?
The following Mitigation Measures were adopted for the approved project:
133
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-19

1. The City shall require and enforce special mitigation measures for special status species as follows: i) For the burrowing owl, all protocol requirements of the CDFG shall be followed before any construction begins on-site and during all construction.

Prior to the start of any construction, including clearing and grading, a preconstruction biological field survey shall be completed by a qualified biologist to identify any active nests or burrows. The biological field survey shall be conducted during both the breeding season and non-breeding season within 30 days of the onset of any ground disturbance.

Should burrowing owls occur on-site, the ultimate final mitigation protocol shall be approved by the CDFG.

2. For Swainson's hawk, any construction disturbances during the breeding season could result in the incidental loss of fertile eggs or nestlings, or otherwise lead to nest abandonment. Disturbances that result in nest abandonment and/or loss of reproductive effort are considered a "taking" by the CDFG. In order to mitigate any potential impacts to the Swainson's hawk or other birds of prey, a qualified biologist shall conduct a field survey of the project site prior to the start of any construction activities, including clearing and grading of the site. The biologist shall note the location of any active nests on site, and a construction buffer shall be provided according to CDFG guidelines to prevent disturbances to or destruction of any observed nests or nestlings.

3. For the San Joaquin kit fox, no mitigation is required for this species due to the lack of any on-site and lack of suitable on-site prey base. No kit foxes or kit fox dens were observed on the project site during the biological field survey.

4. For the Pallid bat, prior to the demolition and removal of any structures on the project site, a qualified biologist shall conduct a field survey of such structures to note the location of any active Pallid bat roosting areas. If active roosting areas are noted, demolition activities shall not begin until alternate roosting are identified and provided in accordance with CDFG guidelines. The mitigation protocol shall be approved by the CDFG.

The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts to biological resources that were identified in the certified EIR to the certified EIR as potentially significant impacts with mitigation measures incorporated that would be reduced to a less than significant impact.

The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
• Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or 134
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-20
regional plans, policies, or regulations, by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
The certified EIR concluded the approved project could potentially disrupt or destroy nests of the burrowing owl, and potentially affect the foraging habitat of other raptors (Swainson's hawk, Cooper's hawk, etc.) during the construction process. In addition, it concluded that it is highly unlikely that any San Joaquin kit fox will be found on the site due to the ongoing agricultural operations, which have effectively removed any suitable biotic habitat for the kit fox from the site. Based on the mitigation imposed by the certified EIR, it was concluded the impact is less than significant with mitigation implemented.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and could also potentially affect the foraging habitat of raptors during the construction process. The proposed modified project would be subject to the approved Mitigation Measures Biological Resources 1-4.

There is no new information or substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described biological resource impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such biological resource impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant with mitigation.
• The project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.

The certified EIR concluded the only local policy or ordinance applicable is the City Tree Ordinance, calling for the conservation of mature and healthy trees whenever feasible and for the protection of trees within the vicinity of structures slated for removal. Mature and healthy trees located on-site should be conserved and protected to the maximum extent practicable according to the City Ordinance. The certified EIR concluded that even with mitigation, the impact is significant and unavoidable.
135
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-21
The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and could also remove mature and healthy trees during the construction process.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of significant and unavoidable.

Cumulative Impact
The Amberwood Specific Plan was developed during the same time period as the updated 2035 General Plan. Therefore, the Amberwood Specific Plan Land Uses and development densities were included in the updated 2035 General Plan Land Use Element, and they were also evaluated and analyzed in the 2035 General Plan Program EIR. The cumulative impacts from the development of the approved Project were therefore considered in the Cumulative Environmental Impact Analysis for the 2035 Updated General Plan. The certified EIR used the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR as a tiering environmental document with regard to the evaluation of cumulative impacts. The General Plan Projection Method was used for the Cumulative Impacts Analysis contained within the certified EIR, and the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR is, therefore, the major reference document for the information contained herein.

Regarding the above-described biological resource impact evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the proposed modified project that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described biological resource impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which 136
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-22
was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such biological resource impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the findings in the certified EIR of a less than significant cumulative impact.
137
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-23

3.5 - Cultural Resources
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project to cultural resources require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.5.1 - SETTING
The cultural resources setting of the proposed modified project and its surrounding area is the same as that of the approved project site. Project setting information for the proposed modified project, including information on the area’s history, ethnography, and regulatory environment, is similar to that of the approved project, as both projects are located within the same geographic area. This information is provided in the certified EIR.

3.5.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts to cultural resources not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. As discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1.5 Addendum Scope of Environmental Review in this Addendum, in the certified EIR the approved project was determined to have no impact with regard to the impact thresholds listed below for the environmental topic of cultural resources. Since the proposed modified project would have the same type of residential development located within the vicinity of the original project site, the impacts of the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to the following impact thresholds as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Therefore, the following is not further analyzed for the proposed modified project in this Addendum:
• Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
• Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
The following Mitigation Measure was adopted for the approved project:

5. If during any construction activities on the project site, including excavating and grading, any archaeological resources or suspected human remains are discovered, all work shall cease immediately until the resource and/or remains are evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If the remains appear to be human, the County Coroner shall be contacted immediately. In addition, if the remains appear to be Native American, then the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted as well. In addition, the lake excavation areas shall be closely monitored for possible uncovered artifacts and/or human remains during all construction phase activities. 138
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-24
The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts to biological resources that were identified in the certified EIR to the certified EIR as potentially significant impacts with mitigation measures incorporated that would be reduced to a less than significant impact.

The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
• Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? • Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? The analysis in the certified EIR concluded during construction of the project, and specifically during the deep excavations required for the private lakes, existing subsurface historical artifacts or archeological resources may be discovered.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and could also impact existing subsurface historical artifacts or archaeological resources.

There is no new information or substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described biological resource impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such cultural resource impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.
139
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-25
Cumulative Impact
The Amberwood Specific Plan was developed during the same time period as the updated 2035 General Plan. Therefore, the Amberwood Specific Plan Land Uses, and development densities were included in the updated 2035 General Plan Land Use Element, and they were also evaluated and analyzed in the 2035 General Plan Program EIR. The cumulative impacts from development of the approved Project were therefore considered in the Cumulative Environmental Impact Analysis for the 2035 Updated General Plan. The certified project EIR used the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR as a tiering environmental document with regards to the evaluation of cumulative impacts. The General Plan Projection Method was used for the Cumulative Impacts Analysis contained within the certified project’s EIR, and the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR is therefore the major reference document for information contained herein.

The proposed project modifications would not generate substantially more adverse cumulative impacts to cultural resources than those disclosed in the certified EIR and would be mitigated to the maximum extent practicable by the incorporation of all feasible and applicable mitigation measures.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a less than significant cumulative impact.
140
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-26

3.6 - Geology and Soils
This section evaluates whether the impacts for the proposed modified project on geology and soils require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.6.1 - SETTING
The certified EIR analyzed the regulation that is normally applicable to geological and soil resources, as well as a description of the physical setting of both the approved site and surrounding lands. The proposed modified project shares a common physical setting of both the proposed modified project site and surrounding lands. An analysis was then provided to determine whether the impact(s) would be less than significant, significant without mitigation, or significant and unavoidable. The below analysis confirms that there are no changes in these circumstances affecting the modified project.

3.6.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to geology and soils not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. As discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1.5 Addendum Scope of Environmental Review in this Addendum, in the certified EIR, the approved project was determined to have no impact with regard to the impact thresholds listed below for the environmental topic geology and soils. Since the proposed modified project would have the same type of residential development located within the vicinity of the approved project site, the impacts of the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to the following impact thresholds as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Therefore, the following is not further analyzed for the proposed modified project in this Addendum:
• Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map as issued by the State Geologist for the project area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?
iv) Landslides?
• Would the project be located on expansive soils, thereby creating substantial risks to life or property?
• Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
The following Mitigation Measure was adopted for the approved project:
141
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-27
• In order to prevent soil erosion by wind, the project site shall be watered down regularly during construction activities in accordance with the Dust Control Plan approved by the SJVAPCD.
• A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be prepared and be submitted to the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The subject SWPPP shall include plans and provisions to minimize soil erosion during normal rainfall and also during major storm events.
• A grading and drainage plan for the project site shall be prepared by a qualified civil engineer. The subject plan shall include plans and provisions to minimize soil erosion and minimize transmission of sediment off-site during major storm events.

The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts to geology and soils that were identified in the certified EIR as significant impacts and, with mitigation measures incorporated, would be reduced to less than significant. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
• Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
ii) Strong Seismic Ground Shaking?
The certified EIR concluded that the approved project site is located greater than 40 miles from the Great Valley Fault System and greater than 50 miles from the Foothills Fault System.

During moderate to severe earthquakes, some ground shaking at the project site will likely occur. However, the intensity of shaking would likely be moderate not strong given the distance to active faults in the region.

There are no changes proposed by the proposed modified project that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described geology and soils impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such geology and soils impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR. 142
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-28
• Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? The certified EIR concluded that based on the soil types, depth to groundwater at the site, and the expected levels of seismic shaking (moderate), the potential for liquefaction at the project site would be considered low.

6. Would development of the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
The certified EIR concluded that the approved project involves the development of homes, commercial businesses, and other public facility uses (school, community center, etc.). These structures and the associated impervious surfaces created (streets, parking lots, driveways, etc.) will prevent the erosion of topsoil. The approved project would also include extensive landscaped park areas and landscaped open space areas, which will also prevent soil erosion.

However, during the construction of the project, soil erosion could occur due to wind and rain. Mitigation measures to control dust and wind-caused soil erosion, such as daily watering of the construction sites, will be required and will minimize soil erosion from wind.

A grading and drainage plan will be prepared by a registered civil engineer. This plan will include provisions to minimize soil erosion due to stormwater flows.

There are no changes proposed by the proposed modified project that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described geology and soils impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such geology and soils impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new impacts not already 143
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-29
analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

7. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? The certified EIR concluded that there is a potential, albeit low, that some areas of the project site could be unstable in the upper two to four feet due to buried debris or undocumented fill material. A geotechnical report and subsurface soil investigation will be completed prior to the start of construction to document any subsurface soil conditions that are problematic for the projected uses. Mitigation measures will be developed to minimize these impacts.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.

Cumulative Impact
The Amberwood Specific Plan was developed during the same time period as the updated 2035 General Plan. Therefore, the Amberwood Specific Plan Land Uses and development densities were included in the updated 2035 General Plan Land Use Element, and they were also evaluated and analyzed in the 2035 General Plan Program EIR. The cumulative impacts from development of the approved Project were therefore considered in the Cumulative Environmental Impact Analysis for the 2035 Updated General Plan. The certified project EIR used the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR as a tiering environmental document with regard to the evaluation of cumulative impacts. The General Plan Projection Method was 144
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-30
used for the Cumulative Impacts Analysis contained within the certified project’s EIR, and the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR is, therefore, the major reference document for the information contained herein.

With respect to the above-described geology and soils impact evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described geology and soils impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such geology and soils impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a cumulatively significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a less than significant cumulative impact.

145
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-31

3.7 - Hydrology and Water Quality
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project on hydrology and water quality require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.7.1 - SETTING
The certified EIR discussed the existing conditions related to hydrology and water quality in the study area and described the environmental setting for hydrology and water quality for the approved project. It also assessed the regulatory setting at the federal, State, and local levels. With respect to hydrology and water quality, the proposed modified project would not result in any changes to the regulatory setting at the federal, State, and local levels considered in the certified EIR.

3.7.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. As discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1.5 Addendum Scope of Environmental Review of this Addendum, in the certified EIR, the approved project was determined to have no impact with regard to the impact thresholds listed below for the environmental topic hydrology and water quality. Since the proposed modified project would result in similar development, the impacts of the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to the following impact thresholds stated in the CEQA Checklist.
• Would the project otherwise substantially degrade water quality? • Would the project place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary Map, Federal Flood Insurance Rate Map, or other Flood Hazard Delineation Map?
• Would the project place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?
• Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as the result of the failure of a levee or dam?
• Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death by inundation due to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? The following Mitigation Measures were adopted for the approved project:

1. The Amberwood project design may include two private lakes containing approximately 30.2 acres of surface area. The private lakes shall be unlined, and shall be designed to maximize underground aquifer recharge volumes. 146
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-32

2. The CID open canal located along the eastern side of Orange Avenue shall be placed underground by the developer with an appropriately sized and designed system between the north side of Lincoln Middle School and Dinuba Avenue.

3. The on-site wastewater treatment plant, if that option is selected and approved by the City, shall be designed to provide a tertiary treatment process and high-quality treated wastewater, which meets Title 22 water quality standards, and which will drain into the private lake areas. The treated wastewater shall recharge the underground aquifer and provide recycled water for landscape irrigation of the public and private park areas, thereby conserving water.

4. The on-site WWTP, if that option is selected and approved by the City, may be dedicated to the City by the developer. The City shall obtain a discharge permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

5. Before being deposited into the two private lake areas, project-related stormwater shall be treated and be filtered as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board to prevent contamination of the underground aquifer drinking water supply.

6. The City of Selma, as a condition of approval for the project, shall require the Amberwood Homeowners Association to implement strict water conservation measures, which shall limit the amount of water used on a monthly basis by each individual dwelling unit to an average of approximately 12,000 gallons per household per month on an annual basis. This shall be accomplished by requiring all homes to have water meters, and by requiring the Amberwood Homeowners Association to implement and enforce strict rules for outdoor watering of landscape areas The subject rules shall strictly limit the time of day for landscape watering to early morning and evening hours only, and shall also limit the duration of time when automatic sprinkler systems are activated to no more than 30 minutes per day in the summer months and 15 minutes per day in the winter months. The limit shall be 20 minutes per day in the fall and spring months.

7. The Amberwood Homeowners Association shall establish a rule that requires that water softeners that rely on salt not be allowed within the Amberwood project area.

The final version of the certified EIR concluded that the approved project would not utilize an on-site wastewater treatment plant. Instead, the intended method of disposing of on-site wastewater disposal and treatment was determined in the Final EIR to be the construction of a gravity flow sewer main that would be connected to the Selma-Kingsburg-Fowler (SKF) County Sanitation District’s wastewater treatment facility. However, the two private lakes were still considered in the certified EIR to be a possible future option, but also otherwise intended a 100-year storm stormwater retention basin. The development of a dual-use ponding basin for stormwater retention is addressed in the Development Agreement. 147
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-33
The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts related to hydrology and water quality that were identified in the certified EIR as potentially significant impacts and, with mitigation measures incorporated, would be reduced to less than significant. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
• Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
The proposed modified project no longer proposes a homeowner’s association for all elements of the development. The mitigation measures have been modified to reflect this change. Restrictions on water usage and water softeners will still be required.

The minor revisions, as shown in underline/strikeout to the mitigation measures below, do not reflect new information or substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described hydrology and water quality impact evaluation standards. There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the modified project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described hydrology and water quality impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such hydrology and water quality impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
• The City of Selma, as a condition of approval for the project, shall require the Amberwood Homeowners Association to implement strict water conservation measures, which shall limit the amount of water used on a monthly basis by each individual dwelling unit to an average of approximately 12,000 gallons per household per month on an annual basis. This shall be accomplished by requiring all homes to have water meters, and by requiring the Amberwood Homeowners Association to implement and enforce strict rules for restrictions for outdoor watering of landscape areas. The subject rules shall strictly limit the time of day for landscape watering to early morning and evening hours only, and shall also limit the duration of time when automatic sprinkler systems are activated to no more than 30 minutes per day in the 148
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-34
summer months and 15 minutes per day in the winter months. The limit shall be 20 minutes per day in the fall and spring months.
• The Amberwood Homeowners Association shall establish a rule that requires that No water softeners that rely on salt shall not be allowed within the Amberwood project area.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.
• Would the project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned land uses for which permits have been granted)? The certified EIR concluded that the approved project, when fully developed with 2,558 housing units, a new school, and new commercial uses, could potentially affect the groundwater table level in the project area. However, although the project will use a substantial amount of groundwater, the project will recharge the existing aquifer through the treated wastewater to be disposed of in the two private lakes, which would be unlined.

As noted in the impact question above, the proposed modified project will not develop the two private lakes, but the Development Agreement will include a dual-use ponding basin for stormwater retention. However, the SKF wastewater treatment facility will still treat wastewater to meet Title 22 requirements. The dual-use ponding basin satisfies the Final EIR’s 100-year stormwater retention basin requirement.

The proposed modified project also incorporates water efficiency through the use of lowflow faucets and toilets, drip irrigation, and native, drought-tolerant landscaping, thereby reducing the impacts to groundwater supplies. These changes in the modified project result in a reduction in project-level impacts related to these resources.

With respect to the above-described hydrology and water quality evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described hydrology and water quality impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such hydrology and water quality impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the 149
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-35
certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
See the impact question above for a list of proposed modifications to mitigation.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.
• Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage patterns of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? • Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off site?
The certified EIR concluded that the approved project will not alter the course of any stream or river, the construction of the project will create many impervious surfaces such as building pads, streets, and parking lots. These surfaces will increase the rate of flow for stormwater runoff during storms. The Final EIR intended for stormwater to be accepted into the two private lakes during severe storm events, and the overflow from the lakes would flow by outfall pipe into a master stormwater detention basin retention basin as outlined in the Final EIR. The certified EIR also concluded that in order to minimize impacts to the existing drainage of the site, a grading and drainage plan will be prepared by a registered civil engineer. The grading and drainage plan will include design provisions to minimize flooding during severe storms. An onsite stormwater collection system will be constructed which will convey stormwater to the stormwater basin.

As noted above, the proposed modified project will not develop the two private lakes, but the Development Agreement will include a dual-use ponding basin for stormwater retention.

The dual-use ponding basin satisfies the Final EIR’s 100-year storm stormwater retention basin requirement
There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

As noted in the impact questions above, the proposed modified project will use the dual-use basin to satisfy the Final EIR’s intended 100-year storm stormwater retention basin requirement. These modifications would not further impact the existing drainage patterns.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described hydrology and water quality impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, 150
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-36
which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such hydrology and water quality impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR and Addendum No. 1, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.
• Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
The certified EIR concluded that in order to minimize impacts to the creation or contribution of runoff water, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the approved project will be required and will be prepared by a qualified civil or environmental engineer.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and could also lead to impacts to the creation or contribution of runoff water. However, the proposed modified project would adhere to the same mitigation measure as the approved project.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described hydrology and water quality impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such hydrology and water quality impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR. 151
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-37

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a less than significant impact.

Cumulative Impacts
The certified EIR concluded that the development of the approved Project, in conjunction with the full buildout of the 2035 General Plan Land Uses, and the anticipated Selma population of approximately 65,000 people in the year 2035, will have a significant, unavoidable, and cumulatively considerable impact on underground water resources within the Consolidated Irrigation District service area. The existing underground aquifer is currently in an overdraft condition. Although mitigation measures for groundwater recharge (recharge basins) will most likely be implemented in the future, the overdraft condition will still persist with the anticipated future population growth and new developments planned for the valley portion of the Southeastern Fresno County Region, which includes not only the City of Selma, but also the Cities of Fowler, Kingsburg, Sanger, and Reedley.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described hydrology and water quality impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such hydrology and water quality impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant cumulative impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.
152
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-38

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of cumulatively significant and unavoidable.
153
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-39

3.8 - Land Use and Planning
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project on land use and planning require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.8.1 - SETTING
The land use and planning setting of the proposed modified project and its surrounding area is similar to that of the approved project site. The proposed modified project site has been historically used for agriculture.

Lands in the vicinity of the proposed modified project area are generally the same as those described in the certified EIR. The land uses surrounding the project site consist of agricultural and residential.

3.8.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to land use and planning not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. As discussed in Chapter 1, Section

1.5 Addendum Scope of Environmental Review of this Addendum, in the certified EIR, the approved project was determined to have no impact with regard to the impact thresholds listed below for the environmental topic land use and planning. Since the proposed modified project would result in similar development within the same footprint of the approved project, the impacts of the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to the following impact thresholds stated in the CEQA Checklist. • Would the project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?
The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts related to land use and planning that were identified in the certified EIR as less than significant. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.
• Would the project physically divide an established community? The certified EIR concluded that the approved project site is located at the eastern edge of the City of Selma and, therefore, would not physically divide an established community. The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and, therefore, would also not physically divide an established community.

There are no changes within the proposed modified project that would involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the 154
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-40
circumstances under which the proposed modified project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described land use and planning impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such land use and planning impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the findings in the certified EIR as less than significant.
• Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the General Plan, Specific Plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The certified EIR concluded that the approved project was consistent with the Selma General Plan and the Amberwood Specific Plan. The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and proposes similar land uses.

There are no changes within the proposed modified project that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed modified project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described land use and planning impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such land use and planning impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR. 155
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-41

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.

Cumulative Impacts
The Amberwood Specific Plan was developed during the same time period as the updated 2035 General Plan. Therefore, the Amberwood Specific Plan Land Uses, and development densities were included in the updated 2035 General Plan Land Use Element, and they were also evaluated and analyzed in the 2035 General Plan Program EIR. The cumulative impacts from development of the approved Project were therefore considered in the Cumulative Environmental Impact Analysis for the 2035 Updated General Plan. The certified EIR used the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR as a tiering environmental document with regard to the evaluation of cumulative impacts. The General Plan Projection Method was used for the cumulative impacts analysis contained within the certified EIR, and the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR is, therefore, the major reference document for the information contained herein.

With respect to the above-described land use and planning evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described land use and planning impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such land use and planning impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.
156
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-42

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of cumulatively less than significant.
157
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-43

3.9 - Noise
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project on noise require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.9.1 - SETTING
The noise setting of the proposed modified project and its surrounding area is generally the same as that of the approved project. The discussion of noise-sensitive land uses, and the existing noise environment (including noise levels from traffic) in the certified EIR provides the setting for the proposed modified project. The information provided in the regulatory setting of the certified EIR is also applicable to the proposed modified project. Refer to these subsections of the certified EIR for a detailed discussion.

3.9.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to noise not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. As discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1.5 Addendum Scope of Environmental Review in this Addendum, in the certified EIR, the approved project was determined to have no impact with regard to the impact thresholds listed below for the environmental topic noise. Since the proposed modified project would have a similar development located within the vicinity of the original project site, the impacts of the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to the following impact threshold as stated in the CEQA Checklist. Therefore, the following is not further analyzed for the proposed modified project in this Addendum:
• For a project located within an airport land use planning area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
• For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The following Mitigation Measures were adopted for the approved project:

1. Increase the setbacks of noise sensitive structures and outdoor activity areas from arterial roadways as required to avoid areas and structures being exposed to greater than 65 db DNL noise levels.

2. Construct a minimum 6-foot-high decorative sound wall between noise-sensitive structures and noise-sensitive outdoor activity areas and arterial roadways. 158
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-44

3. Limit residential structures to single stories when located adjacent to or along major arterials that are subject to substantial traffic noise (above 65 db DNL).

4. City shall ensure the interior noise levels of residential structures do not exceed 45 dB DNL through the use of increased insulation, reduced window areas, and other approved design and construction methods where required for proper noise attenuation.

5. During the site planning process for commercial or institutional uses, ensure buildings are set back a sufficient distance from noise-sensitive land uses such that the outdoor activity areas of noise-sensitive uses do not exceed a noise level of 65 dB DNL.

6. Require the use of engineered sound walls between commercial and institutional uses and noise-sensitive uses as needed for proper noise attenuation.

7. Require the use of equipment enclosures for commercial and institutional mechanical equipment and proper shielding to reduce noise transmission off-site.

8. Implement Policy 3.9 of the General Plan Noise Element, which specifies additional preferred mitigation measures to be considered during the design review of new commercial or institutional uses that may affect nearby noisesensitive uses.

9. For off-site traffic noise impacts to existing uses, the construction of effective sound walls may not be feasible. Therefore, these impacts will remain significant and unavoidable.

10. Noise and vibration impacts from building activities can be mitigated and are not usually considered to be significant if the construction occurring near noise-sensitive uses is limited to daytime hours only, extraordinary noiseproducing activities such as pile driving are not anticipated, and construction equipment is adequately maintained and muffled. City shall enforce Policy 3.1 of the General Plan Noise Element, which provides effective mitigation for construction-related noise and vibration impacts.

The following provides an analysis of the impacts that were identified in the certified EIR as significant impacts that, with mitigation measures incorporated, would be reduced to less than significant and significant impacts that could be reduced to a less than significant level with mitigation measures incorporated. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Appendix G Checklist.
159
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-45
Project Impact
Would the project:
• Would the project result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
• Would the project result in the exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
The certified EIR concluded that the approved project is residential in scope with some community commercial land uses, a school, and a community center. Noise levels and groundbourne vibration will not be excessive with these types of land uses. The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and proposes similar land uses and, therefore, would be subject to the approved Mitigation Measures Noise 1-10.

With respect to the above-described noise and vibration impact evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.
• Would the project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? The certified EIR concluded that the approved project of urban uses (residences, commercial uses, elementary school, community center) will permanently increase the ambient noise 160
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-46
levels in the vicinity of the project. At times, these noise levels could be substantial, especially around the school when children are outside playing or during sporting events such as soccer games. However, these types of noise impacts are temporary in nature. The development of Amber Avenue as a major four-lane arterial could substantially increase traffic-related noise levels. Mitigation measures such as noise buffer walls may be required.

The certified EIR concluded that potential noise impacts are projected to be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and proposes similar land uses.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.
• Would the project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? The certified EIR concluded that temporary substantial increases in ambient noise levels could occur during school activities or sporting events. However, because of their temporary duration, these impacts are considered to be less than significant.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and proposes similar land uses.

With respect to the above-described noise and vibration impact evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant 161
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-47
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.

Cumulative Impacts
The certified EIR determined that impacts of the approved project, when combined with the impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects, would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to noise impacts in the area. The certified project EIR indicated the 2035 General Plan Update contains an update to the Noise Element, which has several specific development policies and standards to minimize and mitigate noise impacts. Uses that generate operational noise and construction noise are timerestricted, in order to minimize impacts to adjacent sensitive land uses and also have performance standards for noise levels at the property lines. Based on the implementation of these policies, the buildout of the 2035 General Plan Land Uses (including the approved project) would result in a less than significant cumulative impact. The proposed modified project would not result in a change to the conclusions regarding cumulative construction noise impacts in the certified EIR.

As a result, the proposed modified project would not create more severe cumulative impacts on noise than those disclosed in the certified EIR and would be mitigated to the maximum extent practicable by the incorporation of mitigation measures of the certified EIR.

With respect to the above-described noise evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial 162
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-48
increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described noise impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such noise impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding of the certified EIR of cumulatively less than significant.
163
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-49

3.10 - Population and Housing
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project on public services require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR. The City has adopted an update to its Housing Element as part of the Fresno County Multi-Jurisdictional 2023-2031 Housing Element. The Housing Element is a State-mandated policy document that is a component of the City of Selma General Plan and is also the basis of this analysis.

3.10.1 - SETTING
The population and housing setting of the proposed modified project and its surrounding area is generally the same as that of the approved project.

3.10.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to population and housing not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. As discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1.5 Addendum Scope of Environmental Review in this Addendum, in the certified EIR, the approved project was determined to have no impact with regard to the impact thresholds listed below for the environmental topic population and housing. Since the proposed modified project would have a similar development located within the vicinity of the original project site, the impacts of the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to the following impact, as thresholds stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Therefore, the following is not further analyzed for the proposed modified project in this Addendum:
• Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing units, necessitating the construction of replacement housing units elsewhere? • Would the project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The following provides an analysis of the impacts that were identified in the certified EIR as significant impacts that, with mitigation measures incorporated, would be reduced to less than significant and significant impacts that could be reduced to a less than significant level with mitigation measures incorporated. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Appendix G Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
164
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-50
• Would the project induce substantial population growth in the area, either directly by proposing new homes and businesses or indirectly through the extension of roads or other infrastructure?
The certified EIR concluded that the full buildout of the approved project with 2,558 housing units will significantly increase the population in the project area and within the City of Selma. The approved project could also induce other new development adjacent to and in the vicinity of the project site. The impacts would directly induce substantial population growth that would be significant and unavoidable. There are no feasible mitigation measures for project-level impacts related to population and housing identified in the certified EIR.

However, it should be noted that California Government Code Section 65584 requires that each city and county plan to accommodate a fair share of the region’s housing construction needs. Selma was a participant in the Fresno Council of Governments (FCOG) preparation of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and the 2023-2031 Housing Element for the region based on existing and projected regional trends in population growth, household sizes, job accessibility, and transportation access. Selma’s goal is to provide up to 1,492 units.

After accounting for planned and approved projects, ADU projections, and capacity on vacant sites, Selma does not have adequate sites to meet its 6th cycle RHNA with a shortfall of 816 units. The modified project will help alleviate the lack of housing opportunities and meet current RHNA goals.

There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding of the certified EIR of significant and unavoidable.
165
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-51
Cumulative Impacts
The Amberwood Specific Plan was developed during the same time period as the updated 2035 General Plan. Therefore, the Amberwood Specific Plan land uses and development densities were included in the updated 2035 General Plan Land Use Element, and they were also evaluated and analyzed in the 2035 General Plan Program EIR. The cumulative impacts from the development of the approved project were therefore considered in the Cumulative Environmental Impact Analysis for the 2035 Updated General Plan. The certified project EIR used the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR as a tiering environmental document with regard to the evaluation of cumulative impacts. The General Plan Projection Method was used for the Cumulative Impacts Analysis contained within the certified project’s EIR, and the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR is, therefore, the major reference document for the information contained herein.

With respect to the above-described population and housing evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described population and housing impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
There are no feasible mitigation measures identified in the certified EIR. No new measures are required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the findings in the certified EIR as a less than significant cumulative impact.
166
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-52

3.11 - Public Services
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project on public services require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.11.1 - SETTING
The provision of public services in the vicinity of the proposed modified project area is generally the same as those described in the certified EIR. The proposed modified project would not result in any changes to the regulatory setting considered in the certified EIR.

3.11.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to public services not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project.

The following Mitigation Measures were adopted for the approved project:

1. Developer/Builder shall pay development impact fees as adopted by the City prior to the issuance of building permits for new homes and commercial buildings.

2. Developer shall dedicate the community center building and surrounding land to the City for public recreational use.

3. Developer shall pay required School Impact Fees to the Selma Unified School District prior to the issuance of building permits by the City.

4. Developer shall agree to participate in a lighting and landscaping assessment district, which will be formed for Amberwood by City Council action.

5. In order to minimize the impacts to the City Public Works Department for street maintenance, all local streets located within Amberwood shall be private streets, and the Amberwood Homeowners Association shall be responsible for the maintenance of all of the private streets.

The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts related to public services that were identified in the certified EIR as potentially significant impacts and, with mitigation measures incorporated, would be reduced to a less than significant impact. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
167
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-53
• Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of public services (Fire Protection, Police Protection, Public Works including Parks, Schools, or Other Public Facilities)? The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and therefore would be subject to the approved Mitigation Measures Public Services 1-5.

The certified EIR concluded that the following would be required and/or provided as part of the adopted Amberwood Specific Plan:

Fire Protection – A new fire substation would be needed to serve the project area. The Amberwood project will provide an approximate 1.5-acre site for a new combined Police and Fire public safety facility.

Police Protection – A new police substation would be needed to serve the project area. The Amberwood project will provide an approximate 1.5-acre site for a new combined Police and Fire public safety facility.

Public Works including Parks - The construction of the Amberwood project will add several miles of new streets to the infrastructure of the City of Selma. These streets will include local streets, collector streets, and arterial streets. Many of the streets within the project, particularly local streets that serve gated individual neighborhoods, will be private and will be owned and maintained by the Amberwood Homeowners Association.

All arterial streets and collector streets will be City-dedicated public streets and will be owned and maintained by the City of Selma.

Schools – A new 10.8-acre elementary school site will be provided within the boundaries of the Amberwood project.

Other Public Facilities – A new community center site will be dedicated to the City. A new onsite wastewater treatment plant will need to be constructed or a connection to the existing SKF WWTP will need to be constructed. A new master stormwater detention basin will need to be constructed.

With respect to the above-described public services evaluation impact standards, except for Impact Public Works including Parks, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the modified project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described public services impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been 168
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-54
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such public services impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

With respect to Impact Public Works including Parks, the certified EIR stated the addition of approximately four miles of new arterial and collector public streets will have an impact on the street maintenance program in the City Public Works Department. This will necessitate the future hiring of new street maintenance personnel and will also require additional street maintenance funding for future seal coating, asphalt crack filling, curb, gutter, and sidewalk replacement, and asphalt overlays. Additional street maintenance equipment and vehicles will also be required, including pickup trucks (2), dump truck (1), and street sweeper (1). A minimum of four additional public works street maintenance personnel will be needed to serve the Amberwood project area. The certified EIR concluded that these impacts would be less than significant with mitigation.

At the time the original project was contemplated, the development proposed gated communities with private local streets. Since that time, a new developer has acquired a portion of the project and is proposing public local streets as part of the development. Local streets are typically developed as public streets within a residential subdivision and are required to be built to City standards. When Tentative Tract Map No. 6244 and the subsequent maps record, the public streets will be dedicated to the City for maintenance purposes. Although this would add to the overall road maintenance of the City, the developer will agree to pay its share of maintenance through an assessment or financing district, such as a Community Facilities District (CFD) or Landscaping, Lighting, and Maintenance District (LLMD). These assessments would help offset road maintenance costs to the City and, therefore, would not significantly affect the overall costs or staffing needs of the City.

Mitigation Measure 5 of the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR, under the public services impact thresholds, would be modified to allow for public local streets. The mitigation measure would be modified to require the local streets to be constructed to City standards and dedicated to the City for maintenance purposes.

The minor revisions, as shown in underline/strikeout to the mitigation measure below, do not reflect new information or substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described Public Services impact evaluation standards. There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. As such, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the modified project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described public services impact evaluation standards. No new information of 169
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-55
substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such public services impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
Revised mitigation measure: In order to minimize the impacts to the City Public Works Department for street maintenance, all local streets located within Amberwood shall be private streets, and the Amberwood Homeowners Association shall be responsible for maintenance of all of the private streets. The developer shall construct all streets to City of Selma standards and may dedicate public streets for incorporation into the City maintenance district. If streets are dedicated, the City may use an assessment or financing district, such as a Community Facilities District (CFD) or Landscaping, Lighting, and Maintenance District (LLMD) to finance maintenance costs associated with the Project.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of less than significant.

Cumulative Impact
The Amberwood Specific Plan was developed during the same time period as the updated 2035 General Plan. Therefore, the Amberwood Specific Plan Land Uses and development densities were included in the updated 2035 General Plan Land Use Element, and they were also evaluated and analyzed in the 2035 General Plan Program EIR. The cumulative impacts from the development of the approved Project were therefore considered in the Cumulative Environmental Impact Analysis for the 2035 Updated General Plan. The certified EIR used the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR as a tiering environmental document with regard to the evaluation of cumulative impacts. The General Plan Projection Method was used for the Cumulative Impacts Analysis contained within the certified EIR, and the certified 2035 General Plan Program EIR is, therefore, the major reference document for the information contained herein.

With respect to the above-described public services evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described public services impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such public services impact evaluation, has been 170
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-56
identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the proposed modified project would not increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of a less than significant cumulative impact.
171
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-57

3.12 - Transportation and Traffic
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project on traffic require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.12.1 - SETTING
The transportation and traffic setting of the proposed modified project and its surrounding area is generally the same as that of the approved project. The discussion of the existing and proposed streets and intersections, performance criteria, existing roadway conditions, public transportation, non-motorized transportation (pedestrian pathways and bikeways), railroad operations, and airport facilities in certified EIR provides the setting for the proposed modified project.

Transportation in the surrounding area is dominated by automobile traffic. With respect to transportation and traffic, the proposed modified project would not result in any changes to the setting considered in the certified EIR, as both projects have similar area characteristics.

3.12.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts to transportation and traffic not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. As discussed in Chapter 1, Section

1.5 Addendum Scope of Environmental Review of this Addendum, in the certified EIR, the approved project was determined to have no impact with regard to the impact thresholds listed below for the environmental topic transportation and traffic. Since the proposed modified project would be a similar development located in the area of the approved project site, the impacts of the proposed modified project would also have no impact with regard to the following impact thresholds provided. Therefore, the following is not further analyzed for the proposed modified project in this Addendum:
• Would the project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in air traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? • Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature such as sharp curves or dangerous intersections, or incompatible uses such as farm equipment?
• Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? • Would the project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation methods such as bus turnouts and bicycle paths? The following Mitigation Measures were adopted for the approved project:
172
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-58

1. The Amberwood project will contribute a Fair Share of the cost to install traffic signals on the SR 99 northbound off-ramp at the Manning Avenue intersection. Fair share cost will be determined by a Traffic Study.

2. The Amberwood project will contribute a Fair Share of the cost to install traffic signals on the SR 99 southbound off-ramp at Mountain View Avenue. The Fair Share cost will be determined by a Traffic Study.

3. The Amberwood project will contribute the entire cost of installing traffic signals at the Del Rey and Manning Avenue intersection. This would mitigate the project impacts to a Less than Significant Level for the Existing+Approved+Project Scenario.

4. The Amberwood project will contribute a Fair Share of the cost to install traffic signals at the Bethel and Manning Avenue intersection. The Fair Share cost will be determined by a Traffic Study.

5. The Amberwood project will contribute a Fair Share of the cost to install traffic signals at the Golden State and Dinuba Avenue intersection. The Fair Share cost will be determined by a Traffic Study.

6. The Amberwood project will contribute a Fair Share of the cost to install traffic signals at the McCall and Dinuba Avenue intersection. All four approaches to the intersection should be modified to provide a separate left turn lane and a combined right turn plus through lane. The Fair Share cost will be determined by a Traffic Study.

7. The Amberwood project will contribute the entire cost of installing traffic signals at the Del Rey and Dinuba Avenue intersection. All four approaches to the intersection should be designed to provide a separate left turn lane and a combined through plus right turn lane. This would mitigate the project impacts to a Less than Significant Level for Existing+Approved+Project Scenario.

8. The Amberwood project will contribute the entire cost of installing traffic signals at the Orange and Floral Avenue intersection. The two Floral Avenue approaches to the modified to provide a separate left turn lane, and a combined through plus right turn lane. This would mitigate the project impacts to a Less than Significant Level for Existing+Approved+Project Scenario.

9. The Amberwood project will contribute the entire cost of installing traffic signals at the Dockery and Floral Avenue intersection. The two Floral Avenue approaches to the intersection should be modified to provide a separate left turn lane, and a combined through plus right turn lane. This would mitigate the project impacts to a Less than Significant Level for Existing+Approved+Project Scenario.

10. The Amberwood project will contribute a Fair Share of the cost to install traffic signals on the SR 99 southbound off-ramp intersection at Second Street. The Fair Share cost is estimated at 15.1 percent, which represents the project percentage of the PM peak 173
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-59
hour entering volume for Existing+Approved+Project Scenario. In addition, the project will also contribute a Fair Share of the cost for the installation of traffic signals on the SR 99 Northbound off ramp intersection at Second Street. The Fair Share contribution for these improvements shall be determined by Caltrans. This would mitigate the project impacts to a Less than Significant Level for Existing+Approved+Project Scenario.

11. The Amberwood project will contribute the entire cost for installing traffic signals at the Orange and Dinuba Avenue intersection. All four approaches to the intersection should be modified to provide a separate left turn lane and a combined right turn and through lane. These improvements would mitigate the project impacts to a Less than Significant Level.

12. The Amberwood project will contribute the entire cost for installing traffic signals at the Rose and Amber Avenue intersection. All four approaches to the intersection should be modified to provide a separate left turn lane and a combined right turn and through lane. This would mitigate the project impacts to a Less than Significant Level.

13. The following mitigation measures, as outlined in the Traffic Impact Study, are recommended to reduce the impacts of the Amberwood project traffic on rail safety at the Floral Avenue railroad crossing: (a) Installation of street median separation to prevent vehicles from driving around the railroad crossing gates. If installation of a median is feasible, the Amberwood project should contribute a Fair Share of the cost of this improvement, (b) Installation of vandal resistant fencing or walls to limit the access of pedestrians onto the railroad right of way at this location. The developer and the City should investigate the feasibility of this measure, and if feasible the developer should contribute a Fair Share toward the cost of implementing this improvement, (c) The City of Selma shall consider implementing a rail safety awareness program to educate the public about the hazards of at grade railroad crossings. The City of Selma Website and informational media resources, such as Operation Lifesaver, can be utilized for public educational purposes. The Amberwood project should contribute a Fair Share toward the cost of implementing this program, and (d) The City should consider including rail crossing improvements in its development impact fee program, whereby a mechanism can be provided for new developments to pay a Fair Share of the costs for rail crossing improvement measures, such as those outlined above. The City of Selma updated 2035 General Plan recommends a grade-separated railroad crossing at the Mountain View Avenue location. If not already included, this improvement should be considered for inclusion in the City of Selma development impact fee program for transportation capital facilities.

14. The Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is included in the DEIR and is an integral part of the FEIR. The Amberwood Specific Plan Project is very large in scale and encompasses approximately 690 acres with a projected maximum total of 2,558 singe-family dwelling units. The project will be constructed in up to 20 phases and may require 20 174
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-60
years or more for a full buildout to be reached. Due to the long-term nature of the project, the traffic impacts will occur over a long period f of time as the project builds out. The exact phasing boundaries for each phase have not been determined at this time and individual phases will contain a varying number of dwelling units, dependent upon annual housing market demand within the Selma area. Therefore, in consultation with City staff, it was determined that additional traffic impact analysis and study will be required for each phase of the Amberwood project. Mitigation measures for traffic impacts from each phase will be contained in subsequent CEQA documents, which are anticipated to be Mitigated Negative Declarations.

In addition, when one or more future Tentative Subdivision Tract Maps are filed, City Staff will develop Conditions of Approval for each Tract Map. The Conditions of Approval will contain Conditions and Mitigation measures necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts associated with each individual Tentative Subdivision Tract Map.

However, at this time, City Staff is requesting that specified roadway sections, bridges, and intersections be included in this FEIR, and referenced herein for future traffic impact analysis study. After determining the Specific Traffic Impacts for each phase of the project, as a Condition of Approval for each Tentative Subdivision Tract Map, the developer/subdivider shall be required to pay the costs for project-related traffic improvements. The FAIR SHARE contribution and a ZONE OF BENEFIT (if needed) will be provided by the City Engineer and will be included in the Conditions of Approval for each Tentative Subdivision Tract Map and as a Mitigation Measure in each subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration CEQA document. Table 3-1 below outlines the additional intersections, roadway segments, and bridges that will require future traffic impact analysis with each particular development phase, which significantly impacts the outlined facilities.

Table 3-1
Intersections, Roadway Segments, and Bridges Requiring Future Traffic Impact Study Intersections Bridges Roadway
Segments
By Impacting
Development
Phase*
(Yes/No)
Required Fair
Share
Contribution
(Yes/No)
Nelson Blvd.
and Orange
Ave.

Manning Ave. Bridge
over State Hwy 99
Leonard Ave. from Dinuba to
Manning Ave.

Yes Yes
Floral and
Amber Ave.

Mountain View Bridge
at Hwy 99
Del Rey (Dinuba to Manning) Yes Yes
Rose and
Amber Ave.

Bridge over Floral
Ave. to Highland
Ave/State Hwy 43
Bethel Ave. from Manning
Ave. to Mountain View
Yes Yes
Bethel and
Mountain View
Ave.

Overpass Bridge
(proposed) over Hwy
99 at Dinuba
Amber Ave. from Floral to
Nebraska Ave.

Yes Yes
Bethel and
Manning Ave.

Overpass Bridge
(proposed over Hwy
99 at Dinuba)
McCall Ave. from Dinuba to
Manning Ave.

Yes Yes
175
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-61
Intersections Bridges Roadway
Segments
By Impacting
Development
Phase*
(Yes/No)
Required Fair
Share
Contribution
(Yes/No)
Del Rey and
Manning Ave.

Bridge over Canal at
Dinuba and Orange
Mountain View Ave. from
Bethel to State Hwy 99
Yes Yes
Floral and
Bethel Ave.

Dinuba Ave. from Golden
State Blvd. to Bethel Ave.

Yes Yes
*Impacting Development Phase to mean “Significantly Impacting” as determined by the City Engineer.

15. FRESNO COUNTY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS. In correspondence from the City Staff dated August 22, 2014, City staff points out that all potentially impacted intersections currently located outside the Selma Sphere of Influence (SOI) have a LOS C service requirement, as far as Fresno County is concerned. Outlined below is a listing of potentially impacted Fresno County street intersections:
• State Highway 99 and Manning Avenue Interchange
• Del Rey and Manning Avenue
• Bethel and Manning Avenue
• Golden State Blvd. and Manning Avenue
• Leonard and Manning Avenue
• McCall and American Avenue
• McCall and Central Avenue
• McCall and Jensen Avenue
• McCall and Mountain View Avenue
• Bethel and Dinuba Avenue
• Bethel and Floral Avenue
• Bethel and Rose Avenue
• Bethel and Mountain View Avenue
• State Route 43 and Highland Avenue
The stated goal of Fresno County is to maintain a minimum of LOS C as the service level for these County intersections. Some of the above-listed intersections already have traffic signals for traffic control, and some of them currently do not. As mitigation measures for maintaining an LOS C service level at uncontrolled Fresno County intersections, the developer, as a condition of approval for any Tentative Subdivision Tract Map filed within the Amberwood Specific Plan area, shall pay a Fair Share or direction impact fees for County traffic signal installations, and required intersection improvements.

The following Fresno County intersections are currently uncontrolled:
• Del Rey and Manning Avenue
• Leonard and Manning Avenue
• McCall and American Avenue
• McCall and Central Avenue
• McCall and Mountain View Avenue
176
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-62
• Bethel and Dinuba Avenue
• Bethel and Floral Avenue
• Bethel and Rose Avenue
The developer's obligation for traffic signal installation at the above-outlined uncontrolled Fresno County intersections shall be determined by an independent traffic study undertaken by the Fresno County Public Works and Planning Department, with consultation and input from the Selma City Engineer. All traffic impact analysis and studies shall be signed off on by a registered Traffic Engineer, registered in the State of California. The fair share contribution for County intersection improvements shall be collected at the time of Building Permit Issuance by the Selma Building Department. The City of Selma shall maintain the collected funds in a dedicated separate account and shall provide the collected funds to Fresno County at the time the County intersection improvements are being made The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts related to public services that were identified in the certified EIR as potentially significant impacts and, with mitigation measures incorporated, would be reduced to a less than significant impact. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
• Would the project cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
• Would the project exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads and highways?
The certified EIR concluded that the approved project would have significant and unavoidable impacts with regard to causing substantial increase in traffic of a street system and exceeding a level of service standard.

A traffic impact study was completed for the Amberwood project EIR by Dowling & Associates. The Traffic Impact Study included a traffic impact analysis and recommended mitigation measures for three scenarios as follows:

1. Existing Plus Project Traffic Levels.

2. Existing Plus Approved Projects Plus Project Traffic Levels.

3. Cumulative 2035 Plus Project Traffic Levels.
177
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-63
The Traffic Impact Study included an analysis of the existing (current) traffic volumes for the weekday peak hour traffic at the following key intersections:
• Manning Avenue and the southbound SR 99 on- and off-ramps • Manning Avenue and the northbound SR 99 off-ramp
• Manning Avenue and Leonard Avenue
• Manning Avenue and McCall Avenue
• Manning Avenue and Del Rey Avenue
• Manning Avenue and Bethel Avenue
• Golden State and Dinuba Avenue
• Dinuba Avenue and Highland Avenue
• Dinuba Avenue and Thompson Avenue
• McCall Avenue and Dinuba Avenue
• Dinuba Avenue and Orange Avenue existing (south of Dinuba) • Dinuba and Del Rey Avenue
• Dinuba and Bethel Avenue
• Golden State and Highland Avenue
• Floral Avenue and De Wolf Avenue
• Floral Avenue and SR 99 southbound off-ramp
• Floral Avenue and SR 99 northbound on-ramp
• Floral Avenue and Highland Avenue
• Floral Avenue and SR 99 northbound off-ramp
• Floral Avenue and Whitson Avenue
• Floral Avenue and McCall Avenue
• Floral Avenue and Orange Avenue
• Floral Avenue and Dockery Avenue
• Floral Avenue and Amber Avenue
• Bethel Avenue and Floral Avenue
• Highland Avenue and SR 99 southbound on-ramps
• Highland Avenue and SR 99 northbound on-ramp
• Highland Avenue and Rose Avenue
• McCall Avenue and Rose Avenue
• Amber Avenue and Rose Avenue
• Bethel Avenue and Rose Avenue
• Second Street and SR 99 southbound off-ramp
• Second Street and SR 99 northbound on-ramp
• Second Street and Whitson Avenue
• Amber Avenue and Nebraska Avenue
• Highland Avenue and Mountain View Avenue
• McCall Avenue and Mountain View Avenue
• Mountain View Avenue and SR 99 southbound off-ramp
• Mountain View Avenue and SR 99 southbound on-ramp
• Mountain View Avenue and SR 99 northbound on-ramp
178
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-64
• Mountain View Avenue and SR 99 northbound off-ramp
• Golden State and Mountain View Avenue
• Mountain View Avenue at proposed Amber Avenue Extension • Mountain View Avenue and Bethel Avenue
• McCall Avenue and American Avenue
• McCall Avenue and Central Avenue
• McCall Avenue and Jensen Avenue
• Manning Avenue and Golden State
• Manning Avenue and SR 99 northbound on-ramp
• Floral Avenue Eastbound and SR 99 northbound on-ramp
• Orange Avenue proposed northward extension (north of Dinuba) and Dinuba Avenue The traffic study also depicted the existing (current) traffic control situation at the above key intersections and labeled the current intersection traffic controls as follows: a) stop sign control, b) all-way stop sign control, and c) traffic signal control.

According to the certified EIR, the approved project at full buildout, will increase traffic significantly within the City of Selma. The approved project will also impact State of California facilities, primarily the State interchanges located at State Route 99 and Floral Avenue, Highland Avenue, Second Avenue, Manning Avenue, and Mountain View Avenue. Some impacts to County roadways and County intersections may also occur.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and even with implementation of Mitigation Measures Traffic 1-18, would have significant and unavoidable impacts with regard to causing substantial increase in traffic of a street system and exceeding a level of service standard.

With respect to the above-described traffic impact evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described traffic impact evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such described traffic impact evaluation, has been identified.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR related to vehicle traffic of a significant and unavoidable impact.

Cumulative Impacts
As discussed above, mitigation measures are required to address the significant impacts of adding residential homes to the regional traffic network. Although the certified EIR for the approved project concluded that the project impacts would be mitigated to the extent feasible with implementation of mitigation measures, the impact related to vehicular traffic would remain significant and unavoidable.

The proposed modified project would implement mitigation measures and would result in a significant impact related to vehicular traffic impacts. The certified EIR concluded that the approved project, when combined with the impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects, would create a substantial adverse effect related to changes in the transportation system, or traffic generation, during construction or operations, project-level and cumulative impacts would be significant and unavoidable. The proposed modified project does not result in an increase in traffic beyond what was analyzed in the certified EIR.

The certified EIR concluded that the cumulative impacts from all existing and reasonably foreseeable projects are considered significant and unavoidable. Mitigation measures would reduce this cumulative impact; however, it remains significant and unavoidable.

The proposed modified project would implement Mitigation Measures and would not result in a change to the conclusions regarding cumulative traffic impacts in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the findings in the certified EIR as a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact.
180
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-66

3.13 - Utilities
This section evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed modified project on utilities and service systems require a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. This section was prepared in part using information from the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR and Selma General Plan EIR.

3.13.1 - SETTING
This section discusses the affected environment and regulatory setting pertaining to water, wastewater treatment, storm drainage facilities, and waste facilities. With respect to Utilities and Service Systems, the proposed modified project would not result in any changes to the setting considered in the certified EIR, and similar to the approved project, the proposed modified project would have a significant and unavoidable impact on utilities and services.

The proposed modified project is a similar type of development as the approved project; therefore, potential impacts to utilities and service systems are similar to those previously identified in the certified EIR.

3.13.2 - IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section evaluates the potential for the proposed modified project to result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to utilities not previously identified in the certified EIR for the approved project. The following provides an analysis of the potential impacts related to utilities and service systems that were identified in the certified EIR as potentially significant impacts. The analysis below addresses the questions as stated in the CEQA Checklist.

Project Impact
Would the project:
• Would the project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
• Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
• Would the project require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
• Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? • Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 181
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-67
• Would the project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
• Would the project comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
The certified EIR concluded that the approved project will place additional significant demands on the electrical grid in the Selma area. In addition, other utilities, including natural gas, telephone, and cable television facilities could also be significantly impacted by the project.

Service systems, including potable water services, wastewater treatment services, and storm drainage systems, will also be impacted by the approved project. In addition, the project will also generate a significant amount of solid waste that must be disposed of in area landfills.

Additionally, the certified EIR concluded that due to the sheer magnitude and size of the project, and the assumed 8,953 projected population, there are no mitigation measures available that can mitigate these significant impacts to a level of insignificance.

The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project. California building codes Title 24 requires all new residential construction to include a PV solar electrical system to help offset electrical demand on the utility grid.

This use of a renewable electrical energy system would actually decrease impacts of the proposed modified project to less than significant levels. However, the significant and unavoidable impacts determination of the approved project remains the same with regard to the utilities evaluated in the certified EIR.

The proposed modified project would generate solid waste during construction and operation similar to that analyzed in the certified EIR. Common construction waste may include metals, masonry, plastic pipes, rocks, dirt, cardboard, or green waste related to land development. SB 1383 requires Fresno County to attain waste diversion goals that include:
• Reducing organic waste: Reducing the amount of organic waste disposed of by 75 percent by 2025.
• Recovering surplus food: Recovering at least 20 percent of surplus food that would otherwise be thrown away by 2025.
• Reducing short-lived climate pollution: Reducing short-lived climate pollution emissions by at least 40 percent by 2030.
• Expanding recycling programs: Expanding the Beverage Container Recycling Program to include wine and distilled spirit containers, and expanding the Covered Electronic Waste Program to include most battery-embedded products.

The proposed modified project would be required to comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to the handling and disposal of solid waste. Therefore, the proposed modified project as described, would be in compliance with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste recycling and 182
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-68
disposal. As a result, the modified project would not create a new or more severe significant impact on public services than the approved project analyzed in the certified EIR.

With respect to the above-described public utility evaluation standards, there are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In addition, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to the above-described public utility evaluation standards. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such public utility impact evaluation, has been identified.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of significant and unavoidable.

Cumulative Impact
The certified EIR concluded that the impacts of the approved project when combined with the impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects, would create a cumulatively substantial adverse effect on public utilities.

As noted above, compliance with Title 24 and SB 1383 regulations will reduce the modified project’s impacts related to energy demand and increase waste diversion and recycling requirements to further reduce impacts on utility facilities. Therefore, based solely on this element of the proposed modified project’s impact, the modified project is making a reduced 183
Environmental Analysis
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 3-69
contribution to any cumulatively considerable net increase in energy usage and a reduction in municipal waste output.

For these reasons, the proposed modifications to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts than those disclosed in the certified EIR. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, relevant to such public utility impact evaluation, has been identified. Therefore, with respect to this criterion, the modified project would not result in any new significant impacts not already analyzed in the certified EIR, and the modified project would not increase the severity of a cumulatively significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the certified EIR.

MITIGATION MEASURES
No new or revised mitigation measures are required beyond those included in the previously certified EIR.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of cumulatively significant and unavoidable.
184
Irreversible Changes and Unavoidable Impacts
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 4-1

IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
Section 15126.2(c) of the CEQA Guidelines defines an irreversible impact as an impact that uses nonrenewable resources during the initial and continued phases of the approved project and the proposed modified project. Irreversible impacts can also result from damage caused by environmental accidents associated with the project. Additionally, irretrievable commitments of resources should be evaluated to ensure that such consumption is justified.

4.1 - Significant Environmental Impacts which Cannot be Avoided The development and subsequent buildout of the approved and modified project will result in several impacts to the environment that cannot be avoided, and which will remain significant and unavoidable impacts. These are outlined below as follows:
• Conversion of approximately 690.7 acres of prime agricultural land to urban uses. • Traffic noise impacts to off-site sensitive land uses (residences, churches, schools, etc.).
• Air quality impacts during the operation of the project from ROG, NOx, and PM10 generation, which will contribute to cumulative air quality health effects for area residents from ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). • Traffic impacts to LOS at specified key intersections from project-generated traffic and residual significant and unavoidable impacts to the Floral Avenue Railroad crossing.
• Hydrology impacts due to stormwater runoff and pumping of groundwater for potable drinking water, and landscaping irrigation water uses, which will contribute to the cumulative groundwater overdraft conditions within the Consolidated Irrigation District Service Area.
• Impacts to the Selma Unified School District from new students living within the project area and the need for a new elementary school.
• Additional significant demands for electricity and natural gas utilities. • Population and Housing. The project could increase the population in the City of Selma by approximately 8,953 persons at full buildout, and result in the construction of up to 2,558 new dwelling units.
• Generation of significant amounts of solid waste.

Regarding the above-outlined significant and unavoidable impacts related to the approved project, the permanent loss of prime agricultural land, additional significant traffic, air quality impacts, and significant demand for groundwater resources are most notable. There is only a fixed number of acres of prime agricultural lands in the State, and once these prime farmlands are converted to urban uses, they cannot be replaced. There are no feasible mitigation measures to impose that would reduce the modified project impacts to a less than significant level.

Regarding water availability, the State is limited in the total amount of water resources available for agricultural and urban uses. The modified project development will require 185
Irreversible Changes and Unavoidable Impacts
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 4-2
potable water for daily needs and for irrigation of landscaping. However, it is also noted that the proposed modified project will no longer develop two private lakes but rather a dual-use ponding basin to handle stormwater retention. In addition, the proposed modified project also incorporates water efficiency through the use of low-flow faucets and toilets, drip irrigation, and the use of native, drought-tolerant landscaping, thereby reducing the impacts on groundwater supplies. Although these changes in the modified project result in a reduction in project-level impacts related to water resources, they will result in significant impacts to the environment that cannot be avoided and that remain significant and unavoidable impacts.

Air quality is also considered a significant unavoidable impact. Most of the unavoidable air quality impacts will be from the additional motor vehicles traveling to and from the project site on a daily basis, which will further degrade air quality in the SJVAB. The proposed modified project would be located within the original footprint of the approved project and would also contribute to ozone and carbon monoxide concentrations. However, as previously noted, Title 13 imposes construction equipment idling restrictions that would reduce emissions of criteria pollutants and GHG emissions during construction of the modified project. With recent changes in California building code Title 24, all new residential construction will include a PV solar electrical system that will provide an emissions-free source of electricity, thus offsetting GHG emissions that would be generated from facilities producing electricity from nonrenewable resources (e.g., coal or natural gas). This use of a renewable electrical energy system would actually decrease the GHG impacts of the proposed modified project.

The proposed modified project would generate solid waste during construction and operation, similar to that analyzed in the certified EIR. The proposed modified project would be required to comply with all federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to the handling and disposal of solid waste, including SB 1383, which requires the diversion of 75 percent organic waste and 20 percent surplus food by 2025 and short-lived climate pollution emissions by at least 40 percent by 2030. However, the proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR of significant and unavoidable.

Regarding traffic impacts, the approved and modified project will impact State of California facilities, primarily the State interchanges located at State Route 99 and Floral Avenue, Highland Avenue, Second Avenue, Manning Avenue, and Mountain View Avenue. Some impacts to County roadways and County intersections may also occur. The proposed modifications to the project do not change the finding in the certified EIR related to vehicle traffic causing a substantial increase in traffic of a street system and exceeding a level of service standard. The modified project will result in significant impacts to the environment that cannot be avoided, and that remain significant and unavoidable impacts.

Regarding the demands for electricity and natural gas utilities, the proposed modified project would comply with Title 24 by including a PV solar electrical system to help offset electrical demand on the utility grid. This use of a renewable electrical energy system would actually decrease the proposed modified project's impacts to less than significant levels. 186
Irreversible Changes and Unavoidable Impacts
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 4-3
However, the significant and unavoidable impacts determination of the approved project remains the same with regard to the utilities evaluated in the certified EIR.

The modified project could increase the population in the City and could also induce other new development adjacent to and in the vicinity of the project site. The impacts would directly induce substantial population growth that would be significant and unavoidable.

There are no feasible mitigation measures for project-level impacts related to population and housing identified in the certified EIR. The modified project will result in significant impacts to the environment that cannot be avoided, and that remain significant and unavoidable impacts.

After accounting for planned and approved projects, additional dwelling units (ADU) projections, and capacity on vacant sites, Selma does not have adequate sites to meet its 6th cycle RHNA with a shortfall of 816 units. The modified project will help alleviate the lack of housing opportunities and meet current RHNA goals. However, the modified project will result in significant impacts to the environment that cannot be avoided and that remain significant and unavoidable impacts.

4.2 - Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes
The development and subsequent buildout of the approved and modified project will result in several impacts to the environment that cannot be avoided, and which will remain significant and unavoidable impacts. These are outlined below as follows:
• Conversion of prime farmland to urban uses.
• Increased local air pollution and degraded air quality, primarily from motor vehicles. • Increases in ambient noise levels in the project area, primarily from increased traffic. • Furtherance of the overdraft of the underground aquifer.

The most notable irreversible environmental change will be the conversion of prime farmland to urban uses. Once converted, this prime farmland will be lost forever and cannot be replaced. There is only a finite amount of prime farmland located within Fresno County, which is the top agricultural producing County in the United States.

Air quality is also considered a significant unavoidable impact. As previously noted, Title 13 imposes construction equipment idling restrictions that would reduce emissions of criteria pollutants and GHG emissions during construction of the modified project. With recent changes in California building code Title 24, all new residential construction will include a PV solar electrical system that will provide an emissions-free source of electricity, thus offsetting GHG emissions that would be generated from facilities producing electricity from 187
Irreversible Changes and Unavoidable Impacts
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 4-4
nonrenewable resources (e.g., coal or natural gas). This use of a renewable electrical energy system would actually decrease the GHG impacts of the proposed modified project.

The significant amount of vehicle traffic generated by the Amberwood Project on a daily basis will result in further degradation of local Air Quality. This will result in increased levels of ozone and particulate matter in the SJVAPCD monitoring area. Although the use of public transit facilities could reduce air pollution from motor vehicles, the levels of air pollution from vehicles will still be significant and cannot be avoided.

Increased levels of noise, primarily from additional motor vehicle traffic, will permanently increase the ambient noise levels for offsite transportation corridors, such as Floral Avenue and Dinuba Avenue, thereby exposing existing homes located adjacent to these corridors to increases in traffic noise. This increase in ambient noise levels will be permanent and irreversible. Noise walls within existing developed areas have been determined to be infeasible.

The increased potable water demand from the development of the project will be permanent, and no new water sources are available to replace or increase the amount of groundwater available within the Consolidated Irrigation District Service Area. Regarding water availability, the State is limited in the total amount of water resources available for agricultural and urban uses. The modified project development will require potable water for daily needs and for irrigation of landscaping. However, it is also noted that the proposed modified project will develop a dual-use ponding basin. The wastewater treatment facility will continue to treat water to meet Title 22 requirements and water quality standards and will be used for irrigation. In addition, the proposed modified project also incorporates water efficiency through the use of low-flow faucets and toilets, drip irrigation, and the use of native, drought-tolerant landscaping, thereby reducing the impacts to groundwater supplies. 188
Growth-Inducing Project Impacts
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 5-1

GROWTH-INDUCING PROJECT IMPACTS
The Amberwood Specific Plan and the Selma General Plan Update recognize that certain forms of growth are beneficial, both economically and socially. Section 15126.2(d) of the CEQA Guidelines states the following regarding growth-inducing impacts: “A project is identified as growth-inducing if it “would foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment.”
Growth inducement can be a result of new developments that require an increase in employment levels, remove barriers to development, or provide resources that lead to secondary growth. With respect to employment, the approved project and the modified project would not induce substantial growth. Similar to the approved project, the modified project would be expected to be hired from the local community. It is anticipated that the construction workforce would commute to the project site each day from local communities.

Construction staff not drawn from the local labor pool would stay in nearby hotels. However, construction is a temporary activity and would not generate long-term housing needs for these workers. There are no other aspects of the modified Project (such as the creation of oversized utility lines, etc.) that would induce further growth in the area.

The proposed modified project is the establishment of a residential development that is being proposed in response to the demand for housing in the area and to help alleviate a shortage in housing. The City is working to meet RHNA and the 2023-2031 Housing Element to provide up to 1,492 units, currently has a shortfall of 816 units. The modified project will help alleviate the lack of housing opportunities and meet current RHNA goals. There are no changes proposed by the project modifications that involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Thus, as has been upheld in the courts, this level of analysis provided in this Addendum to the certified EIR is adequate to inform the public and decision-makers of the growth-inducing impacts of the modified project.
189
Addendum to the certified Amberwood Specific Plan EIR January 2025 City of Selma Page 6-1

LIST OF PREPARERS
Lead Agency
City of Selma Department
• Jerome Keene – Deputy City Manager
• Kamara Biawogi – City Planner
Project Proponent
Lennar Homes of California– Walter Diamond
Technical Assistance
Environmental Consultant
QK
5080 California Avenue, Suite 220
Bakersfield, CA 93309
• Jaymie Brauer, Principal Planner
• Christopher Mynk, AICP, ENV SP, Principal Planner
190
EXHIBIT “D”

COST ESTIMATES,
WARRANTY SECURITY and

IMPACT FEES
191
192
EXHIBIT D TRACT 6244
$3,625,835.00
$3,637,438.00
$0.00
$0.00
$872,240.00
$1,017,725.00
$2,005,000.00
$11,158,238.00
$1,096,188.00
$12,285,476.00
$31,050.00
$13,514,023.60
$5,579,119.00
$31,050.00
$19,093,142.60
$218,060.00
$0.00
$0.00
$465,516.30
$683,576.30
Water Well Construction (paid to CalWater)
Water System Construction (paid to CalWater)
Storm Drain Construction
Street Construction
B. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS (Due with Subdivision Agreement) Landmarks, Monuments, Lot and Block Corners
Park and Open Space Construction
Sewer System Construction

COST ESTIMATES, WARRANTY

SECURITY AND IMPACT FEES
Monumentation Security (100% of estimate cost)
Dry Utilities Construction
Other Warranty (10% of construction cost)

TOTAL WARRANTY REQUIRED
Construction Contingency
Sub-Total (for bonding purposes)
Sewer Warranty (25% of construction cost)
Water Warranty (25% of construction cost)
Private Road Warranty (10% of construction cost)
A. Approved Public Improvement Construction Estimates
C. WARRANTY SECURITY REQUIREMENTS (Condition of Acceptance of Improvements)

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
Performance Security (110% of construction cost estimate) Contractor Security (50% of construction cost estimate)

TOTAL SECURITY REQUIRED
193
ts)
194
TRACT 6244
$12,285,476.00
297
Payment Timing
$410,616.40 Prior to Final Map Recordation
$0.00 Prior to Final Map Recordation
$410,616.40 Prior to Final Map Recordation
Payment Timing
$225,720.00 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
$0.00
$225,720.00
$552,420.00 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
$0.00
$552,420.00
$801,900.00 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
$516,415.00
$285,485.00
$671,220.00 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
$671,220.00 Dual Use Basin Dedication (100%)
$0.00
$1,253,340.00 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
$1,253,340.00
$534,600.00 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
$0.00
$534,600.00
$255,420.00 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
$0.00
$255,420.00
$2,203,740.00 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
$2,203,740.00 Park and Dual Use Basin Dedication (100%) $0.00
$3,106,985.00
Payment Timing
$148,500.00 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
$629,046.00 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
$1,673,595.00 Already paid
$102,654.10 Already paid
$2,553,795.10
Map Recording Fees
D. MISCELLANEOUS FEES AND CHARGES
Public Improvement Inspection Fees

EXHIBIT D
Credit/Reimbursement
Law Enforcement

SUBTOTAL
Credit/Reimbursement

COST ESTIMATES, WARRANTY

SECURITY AND IMPACT FEES
Circulation Facilities
Storm Drain Facilities
Wastewater
Credit/Reimbursement

SUBTOTAL
Credit/Reimbursement

SUBTOTAL

SUBTOTAL
NOTE: Dependent on square foot of proposed single family homes. 2,000 square foot home used for estimating purposes to give estimate of total fees due in comparison with credit. May be subject to alterations based on provisions of Development Agreement or Reimbursement Agreement.

Credit/Reimbursement

SUBTOTAL
Credit/Reimbursement

SUBTOTAL
Credit/Reimbursement
City Facilities
NOTE: Dependent on square foot of proposed single family homes. 2,000 square foot home used for estimating purposes to give estimate of total fees due in comparison with credit.

Final Construction Cost Estimate
Number of Lots
C. OUTSIDE AGENCY FEES AND CHARGES
Selma Unified School District Facilities Fees
Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee
Selma-Kingsburg-Fowler Sanitation District Fees
CalWater Connection Fees

TOTAL OTHER AGENCY FEES (ESTIMATED)
Fire Suppression

TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
D. IMPACT FEES AND CREDITS ESTIMATES
Public Use Facilities
Parks and Open Space

TOTAL IMPACT FEES (ESTIMATED)

SUBTOTAL
195
196
EXHIBIT “E”
CFD 2006-01, ZONE B,

ASSESMENT CHARGES
197
198
City of Selma 11/4/2025
Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Zone B (Tract 6244) Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT B: Rate and Method of Apportionment

CITY OF SELMA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-1, ZONE B (Tract 6244) A Special Tax of City of Selma Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Zone B (Tract 6244) (the “District”) shall be levied on all Assessor's Parcels in the District and collected each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2025/2026 in an amount determined by the City through the application of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax set forth below. All of the real property in the District, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided.

A. Definitions
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
“Act” means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, as amended. “Administrative Expenses” means the actual or estimated costs incurred by the City as administrator of the District to determine, levy and collect the Special Taxes, including the proportionate amount of the salaries and benefits of City employees whose duties are directly related to administration of the District and the fees of consultants, legal counsel, the costs of collecting installments of the Special Taxes upon the general tax rolls, preparation of required reports; and any other costs required to administer the District as determined by the City.
“Annual Escalation Factor” means the greater of the increase in the annual percentage change of the All Urban Consumers Consumer Price Index (CPI) or three percent (3%).

The annual CPI used shall be for the West Urban Area as reflected in the then-current April update. The annual CPI used shall be as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and may be obtained on the following web site www.bls.gov/cpi. If the foregoing index is not available, the District Administrator shall select a reasonably comparable index.
“Assessor's Parcel” means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor's Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor's Parcel number.
“Assessor's Parcel Map” means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by Assessor's Parcel number.
“Base Year” means Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2025.
“City” means the City of Selma.
“Council” means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of the District. “County” means the County of Fresno, California.
199
City of Selma 11/4/2025
Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Zone B (Tract 6244) Page 2 of 5 “Developed Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels for which a building permit was issued prior to May 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. “Developed Single-Family Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit(s) has been issued for purposes of constructing one single-family residential Unit.
“District Administrator” means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes.
“District” means City of Selma Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Services). “Exempt Property” means an Assessor's Parcel not subject to the Special Tax. Exempt Property includes: (i) Public Property, (ii) Property Owner Association Property, (iii) NonResidential Property, (iv) Undeveloped Property, and (v) property reasonably designated by the City or District Administrator as Exempt Property due to deed restrictions, development limitations, lot bifurcation, or similar factors.
“Fiscal Year” means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. “Maximum Special Tax” means the maximum Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C below that can be levied in the District in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor’s Parcel. “Non-Residential Property” means all Assessors’ Parcels for which a building permit(s) has been issued for a non-residential use and does not contain any residential Units as defined under Developed Single Family Residence.
“Property Owner Association Property” means any property within the boundaries of the District that is owned by, or irrevocably dedicated as indicated in an instrument recorded with the County Recorder to a property owner association, including any master or subassociation. “Proportionately” means for Developed Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levied per Unit for each Land Use Class to the Maximum Special Tax per Unit for the applicable Land Use Class is equal for all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property. “Public Property” means any property within the boundaries of the District that is, or is expected to be, used for rights-of-way, parks, schools or any other public purpose or is owned by or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State, the County, the City or any other public agency.
“Service Costs” means the estimated and reasonable costs of providing police protection services, fire protection and suppression services, paramedic services, park maintenance services, and storm drainage system operation and maintenance services, including but not limited to (i) the costs of contracting for police, fire, paramedic, park, and storm drainage services, (ii) the salaries and benefits of City staff that directly provide police protection services, fire protection and suppression services, paramedic services, park maintenance services, storm drainage maintenance services, and other services as defined herein, respectively, (iii) the expense related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services as authorized by the Act, and (iv) City overhead costs associated with providing such services within the District. On each July 1 following the Base Year, the increases 200
City of Selma 11/4/2025
Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Zone B (Tract 6244) Page 3 of 5 attributed to salaries and benefits shall be calculated and limited to the increase based on the Annual Escalation Factor. The Special Tax will finance Services that are in addition to those provided in or required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing Services already available. The Special Tax provides only partial funding for police services, fire suppression and protection services, paramedic services, park maintenance, and storm drainage system operation and maintenance.
“Special Tax” means the Special Tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property to fund the Special Tax Requirement, and shall include Special Taxes levied or to be levied under Sections C and D below. “Special Tax Requirement” means that amount required in any Fiscal Year for the District to: (i) pay for Service Costs; (ii) pay reasonable Administrative Expenses; (iii) pay any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve funds; and (iv) pay for reasonably anticipated delinquent Special Taxes based on the delinquency rate for Special Taxes levied in the previous Fiscal Year; less any surplus of funds available from the previous Fiscal Year’s Special Tax levy.
“State” means the State of California.
“Taxable Property” means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of the District and any future annexation to the District that are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or as defined herein.
“Undeveloped Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor’s Parcels not classified as Developed Property, including an Assessor’s Parcel that is designated as a remainder parcel and is not identified as potential Public Property by any final documents and/or maps available to the District Administrator.
“Unit” means any separate residential dwelling unit in which a person or persons may live, which comprises an independent facility capable of human habitation and is not considered to be for commercial or industrial use.

B. Assignment to Land Use Categories
Each Fiscal Year using the definitions above, all Assessor’s Parcels within the District shall be classified as Taxable Property or Exempt Property. Taxable Property shall be further classified as Developed Single-Family Property. Commencing with the Base Year and for each subsequent Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property shall be subject to Special Taxes pursuant to Sections C and D below.
201
City of Selma 11/4/2025
Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Zone B (Tract 6244) Page 4 of 5 C. Maximum Special Tax Rate

1. Taxable Property
TABLE 1
Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property
City of Selma Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Zone B (Tract 6244) Service
Maximum
Special Tax
Per Unit1
Admin Costs $25.24
Community Park Facilities $7.16
Fire $381.98
Landscaping $83.50
Park Maintenance $111.44
Police $400.82
Road Maintenance (off site) $66.10
Road Maintenance (on site) $308.87
Storm Drain (on-site) $15.63
Storm Drain (off-site) $2.01
Streetlight $7.74
Total Assessment $1,410.49
On each July 1 following the Base Year (i.e., July 1, 2025), the Maximum Special Tax Rates in Table 1 shall be increased in accordance with the Annual Escalation Factor.

2. Exempt Property
No Special Tax shall be levied on Exempt Property.

D. Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax
Commencing with Fiscal Year 2025/2026, and for each subsequent Fiscal Year, the District Administrator shall calculate the Special Tax Requirement based on the definitions in Section A and levy the Special Tax as follows until the amount of the Special Tax levied equals the Special Tax Requirement. First, the Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year on each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property Proportionately between Developed SingleFamily Property up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax.

E. Appeals
Any taxpayer that believes that the amount of the Special Tax assigned to an Assessor’s Parcel is in error may file a written notice with the District Administrator appealing the levy of the Special Tax. This notice is required to be filed with the District Administrator during the Fiscal Year the error is believed to have occurred. The District Administrator or designee 202
City of Selma 11/4/2025
Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Zone B (Tract 6244) Page 5 of 5 will then promptly review the appeal and, if necessary, meet with the taxpayer. If the District Administrator verifies that the tax should be changed, the Special Tax levy shall be corrected and, if applicable in any case, a refund shall be granted.

F. Exemptions
No Special Tax shall be levied on Non-Residential Property, Undeveloped Property, Property Owner Association Property or Public Property.

G. Manner of Collection
Special Tax as levied pursuant to Section D above shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that the District Administrator may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District or as otherwise determined appropriate by the City Council.

H. Term of Special Tax
After the establishment of the District, the City Council may reexamine, if deemed necessary by City Council, the necessity of the continuance of the Special Tax through the preparation of a Fiscal Impact Analysis or similar study, otherwise the Special Tax shall be levied in perpetuity.
203
204
2-5
Approval –
Consideration of Resolution
2025-120R
Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute all Contract Agreements,
Program Subcontractor
Agreements and Any
Amendments Thereto with the
California High Speed Rail
Authority
205
206
ITEM NO: 2-5

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: November 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2025-120R Authorizing the City Manager to Execute all Contract Agreements, Program Subcontractor Agreements, and Any Amendments Thereto with the California High Speed Rail Authority
SUBMITTED: Jerome Keene, Deputy City Manager
APPROVED: John Kunkel, Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2025-120R authorizing the City Manager to execute all Master Agreements, Central Valley Training Center Contracts, and Any Amendments thereto with the California High Speed Rail Authority.

DISCUSSION:

The California High Speed Rail Authority requires updated documentation explicitly indicating the individuals authorized to sign agreements on behalf of the City of Selma. The timely provision of an updated Resolution is essential to guaranteeing continued funding for the Central Valley Training Center (CVTC). It ensures compliance with High-Speed Rail Authority requirements and maintains the City's eligibility for contracting with HSRA for the CVTC.

FISCAL IMPACT:

High Speed Rail provides the City of Selma and its contractors (Fresno Economic Development Corporation) reimbursement for activities associated with operating the CVTC.

This reimbursement includes staff time for billing, administration of the contract, and materials for students of the various cohorts at CVTC.

Attachments:
☒ Resolution 2025-120R
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☐ Other
List: Applications
207
208
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-120R

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SELMA, CALIFORNIA,

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL CONTRACT

AGREEMENTS, AND PROGRAM SUBCONTRACTOR AGREEMENTS, AND ANY

AMENDMENTS THERETO WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL

AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the City of Selma is eligible to receive funding for certain Workforce Development Projects, through the California High Speed Rail; and
WHEREAS, Master Agreements need to be executed with the California High Speed Rail Authority before such funds could be claimed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Selma wishes to delegate authorization to execute these agreements and any amendments thereto to the City Manager be authorized to execute all Contract Agreements, Program Subcontractor Agreements, and any amendments thereto with California High Speed Rail Authority.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Selma as follows:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. Severability. The provisions of this Resolution are severable and if any provision, clause, sentence, word, or part thereof is held illegal, invalid, unconstitutional, or inapplicable to any person or circumstances, such illegality, invalidity, unconstitutionality, or inapplicability shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, clauses, sentences, sections, words, or parts thereof of the Resolution or their applicability to other persons or circumstances.

SECTION 3. Effective Date. That the City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and shall be in full force and effective as of November 18, 2025.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
ATTEST: Scott Robertson
Mayor
______________________________
Sara M. Carlson
City Clerk
209
210
4-1
Action Item –
Consideration of the
Downtown Business
Improvement District (BID)
Advisory Board Appointment
211
212
ITEM NO: 4-1

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: November 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of the Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) Advisory Board Appointment
SUBMITTED: Jose Moreno, Public Information Officer
APPROVED: John Kunkel, Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

The Selma City Council is responsible for appointing members to various Boards and Commissions, including the Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) Advisory Board. This board plays a crucial role in advising the City Council on issues impacting the downtown business community and ensuring responsiveness to community needs.

The BID Advisory Board, consisting of nine members, represents a diverse mix of businesses within the BID district. Each member serves a one-year term, with terms staggered to ensure continuity. Individuals considered for appointment in this report applied during the most recent open application window for the Downtown BID Advisory Board.

Staff recommends that Council review the attached applications and appoint to the respective vacant positions.

DISCUSSION:

A vacancy on the Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) Advisory Board occurred on September 26, 2025. To fill the vacant seat, staff announced the opening through the Downtown Selma social media page, a public notice, and on the City’s website, directing business owners within the district to complete the online application.

Three applications were received from the following individuals:
• Jane Ono, Mary Kay Cosmetics
• Andres Manzo, Atrie’s Gaming Center
• Matthew Rodriguez, Impak’d Industries
In accordance with the BID Management Plan, the City Council is asked to review the submitted applications and appoint one representative to serve a one-year term on the Advisory Board.
213
FISCAL IMPACT:

None
Attachments:
☐ Resolution
☐ Ordinance
☐ Map
☐ Agreement
☒ Other
List: Applications (3)
214
Name
,.

Received
S£p 1 5 20
APPLICATION ·
�5
Downtown Selina BID Advisory Bog{ly Of Selma
Return to: 1710 Tucker Street, Selma, CA.

Business address --1�-'-----<-L....::.+-1'-'----=----=----.>.....<><:....::J........>....L..-----'--�:......::,,.._-�-� Years operated a business in Downto n Selma / �
Comm unity involvement
_
-,. f dJf1i /,l uK 1.ucl'£1?.c. f) d:2, Oa1w..t �
� V,_, � ury' u�, Oi!h 1/f_ t1t., vno/ (l}uu c,,;/...

What knowledge and experience do you have in the following areas:
��-1-+-=��·�udi��f�
• YifS
�
'-:-)t..&...�d.__��_:,.\__J.LL&<,j..CL{lU-,t.J,.i:.a..(L��_u:'.!L..)1:.1.!!aU::Q'.l� 'd,.JAp;;· �,I;
' .
·oowntown J UNvl/1 _!Jn_i;.e_!o _. -. -. _/Y}_,A--_-<
__ � -. -. v
/f W;� tn aw�
I • 7
·--------/,----L...l.--l,-!.��---'-"-'l.L..!-�=-----...i..::..::��c..i..::...---'---"'l."'-'"<---!:=- vyt/ {2_, , l,'u LW,ut,, l/t».,MA/ IJ
VU V oUh\.,, �.
215
216
217
218
219
220

Selma City CouncilNovember 18, 2025

Selma City Council
November 18, 2025