Construction-related impacts and long-term impacts
to water quality will be qualitatively evaluated, and
both direct and cumulative impacts related to the
project will be described. The memorandum will also
address regulatory compliance, includ ing
conformance with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System permit requirements and identify
applicable best management practices included in
the project design. lt is assumed that no water quality mitigation will be required for the project. The
memorandum will be submitted electronically and
subject to one round of review from NCM, the City,
and Caltrans.
Task Deliverables: Water Quality Memorandum
(Electronic Gopy)
Task 5.6 - Environmental Document
(cEoA)
Task 5.6.1 - Administrative Draft lnitial Study
The City will be the CEQA lead agency for the
Widening Project. Following completion of the
appropriate database research and technical studies,
GPA will prepare an Administrative Draft lnitial Study
(lS) in MS Word for NCM and the City to review
pursuant to state and local CEQA guidelines. lt is
assumed Caltrans will not review the lS prior to
public circulation. Assembly Bill (AB) 52 consultation
information will be provided in a confidential
appendix.
Following the submittal of the Administrative Draft lS, a virtual meeting will be scheduled with City staff
representatives to review the findings of the
Administrative Draft lS, which willconfirm proceeding
with a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The
meeting will also provide an opportunity to review the
parameters of the study to date, as well as the
environmental review schedule.
With a conclusion that no significant environmental
impacts will occur as a result of implementing the
project, a MND will be prepared. GPA will then
respond to NCM and the City's comments on the
Administrative Draft lS and prepare a Check-Copy
Draft IS/MND in MS Word showing track changes
and a PDF for the City to review prior to circulating
the Draft lS/MND (Task 5.6.2).
Task Deliverables - Draft lS and Gheck Copy lS /
MND
Task 5.6.2 - Draft lnitial Study
GPA will prepare and maintain a comprehensive,
project-specific environ mental agency/organization,
community, and elected official distribution list using ndard Road Widening Project Phase 2
information provided by the County and Caltrans
from other projects in the area. The community
portion of the database could include local
representative voices from neighborhood groups,
community organizations, civic organizations, the
surrounding business community, schools,
emergency services, religious organizations, and
low-income/minority populations that could be
affected by project activities. The distribution list will also include mailing addresses for all businesses and
property owners within 300 feet of the environmental
study limits, which will be identified through
Parcelquest.
Upon approval to circulate the Draft IS/MND, GPA
will prepare and circulate up to 50 electronic copies
(on CD or DVD) and up to 15 hard copies of the Draft
IS/MND. GPA will also prepare the Notice of lntent
(NOl) to Adopt the MND, a Notice of Completion
(NOC), SCH Summary Form, and Transmittal
Memos for the Draft IS/MND. lt is assumed that the
City will prepare and place ads in local newspaper,
send email notices, and post the NOI and Draft
lS/MND online.
Task Deliverables - Master Distribution List
(Electronic Gopy), One electronic version of the
NOl, NOC, SCH Summary Form, and County
Transmittal Memo. Print and mail up to 50 hard
copies of the NOI to the public (radial mailing)
sent via regular mail. Print and mail up to 50 hard
copies of the NOI with electronic copies of the
Draft IS/MND on CD or DVD to agencies, elected
officials, and other stakeholders sent via certified
mail. Print and ship up to five (5) hard copies of
the Draft IS/MND with technicalstudies and
appendices to the Gity. Print and deliver up to
two (2) hard copies to Kern County Clerk and one
(l) hard copy to one local library of the Draft
IS/MND without technical studies.
Task 5.6.3 - Final lnitial Study
GPA will maintain a file of any comments received
during the circulation period of the Draft lS/MND. The
number and extent of comments is unknown at this
time. GPA assumes only up to five comment letters
or emails will be received during the public comment
period. Formal responses to comments are not
required for an IS/MND but can be prepared for
additional scope and budget.
Following the completion of the public circulation
period and receipt of all comments to be considered,
GPA will prepare a Final IS/MND for NCM and the
City to review, showing track changes from the Draft
IS/MND. lt is assumed that any changes to the
IS/MND will be minor, there would be no changes to
of Shafter Division
Professional Eng¡neering Services for
Amendment No. I
the project description or project limits, and technical studies will not need to be updated, modified, or
revised.
With a conclusion in the Final IS/MND that no
significant environmental effects will occur as a result of implementing the project, the MND will be signed
and GPA will prepare a Notice of Determination
(NOD) for the project. The NOD must be filed within
five days of project approval for a 30-day statute of
limitations to apply. Upon request, GPA will
coordinate payment of the County Filing Fee
($50.00) and CDFWfiling fees ($2,548.00), which
are set by statute. GPA may require additional
budget for changes to filing fees.
It is assumed that others will prepare any additional
documentation for project approval (e.9., staff
reports, resolutions, etc.). Should GPA's attendance
be needed at any City Council or public hearing or
public meeting, this can be provided on a time and
material basis under a separate scope and budget.
Spanish versions of any deliverable can also be
provided for additional scope and budget.
Task Deliverables - One electronic copy of the
NOl, NOD, SCH Summary Form, and Gounty
Transmittal Memo. Print and mail up to ten (10)
hard copies of the NOI with electronic copies of
the Final IS/MND on CD or DVD sent via certified
mail. Print and ship up to five (5) hard copies of
the Final IS/MND with technical studies to the
City. Print and deliver up to two (2) hard copies
of the Final IS/MND without technical studies to
Kern County. Print and ship up to one (1) hard
copy of the Final IS/MND without technical
studies to one local library.
Task 5.7 - Environmental Document
(NEPA)
Task 5.7.1 - Agency Scoping
Caltrans will be the lead agency under NEPA. lt is
assumed that the NEPA document will be a Routine
EnvironmentalAssessment (EA) and a new or
revised Preliminary Environmental Study will not be
needed for the Widening Project. There is no formal
public scoping requirement under NEPA or its
implementing regulations for a Routine EA. To help
identify issues or concerns that may be raised during
the NEPA process, GPA will prepare and mail up to
50 letters to interested agencies on Caltrans
letterhead. GPA can attend public or agency scoping
meetings or hearings on a time and material basis
under a separate scope and cost, if needed. Radial
letters to adjacent landowners and newspaper
Standard Road Wdening Project Phase 2
notices can also be provided for additional scope and
budget, if needed.
Task Deliverables - Up to 50 agency and
interested party letters.
Task 5.7.2 - Administrative Draft Environmental
Assessment
Following completion of the appropriate database
research and technical studies, GPA will prepare the
First Administrative Draft EA pursuant to state and
local CEQA guidelines as well as Caltrans' Standard
Environmental Reference and Caltrans' EA
Annotated Outline (dated March 25, 2020). lt is
assumed that the First Administrative Draft EA will be
submitted electronically and will undergo one round
of reviews with NCM Engineering Corp (NCM) and
the City. GPA will respond to NCM and the City's
comments and prepare a Second Administrative
Draft EA, which will undergo one round of reviews
from NCM, the City, and Caltrans. GPA will then
respond to Caltrans' comments and prepare a
Check-Copy (i.e., Screen-Check) Draft EA for the
City and Caltrans to review prior to circulation of the Draft EA. It is assumed that the EA will not require
Caltrans Headq uarter District Environmental
Coordinator review. Any changes to technical
studies, templates, or annotated outlines following
submittal of the First Administrative Draft EA may
require additional scope and budget.
Task Deliverables - One electronic copy of the
First Administrative Draft EA. One electronic
copy of the Second Administrative Draft EA. One
electronic copy of the Gheck-Copy Draft EA
Task 5.7.3 - Draft EnvironmentalAssessment
Upon approval to circulate the Draft EA, GPA will
prepare a Notice of Availability (NOA). GPA will then
print up to 15 hard copies and prepare up to 100
electronic copies of the Draft EA (on CD or DVD).
GPA will circulate the Draft EA for a 30-day review
period as directed by Caltrans. lt is assumed that
Caltrans will be responsible for posting the NOA
online and filing the NOA with the State
Clearinghouse. Newspaper notices and Spanish
versions of deliverables can be provided for
additional scope and budget, if needed.
Task Deliverables - One electronic copy of the
NOA. Print and mail up to 50 hard copies of the
NOA to the public (radial mailing) sent via regular
mail. Print and mail up to 50 hard copies of the
NOA with electronic copies of the Draft EA on CD
or DVD to agencies, elected officials, and other
stakeholders sent via certified mail. Print and
ship up to five (5) hard copies of the Draft EA
of Shafter Division
Professional Eng¡neering Serv¡ces for
Amendment No. 1
of Shâfter D¡vls¡on
Professional Engineering Services for
Amendment No. 1
with technical stud¡es and appendices to the
City. Print and sh¡p up to f¡ve (5) hard cop¡es of
the Draft EA with technical studies and
append¡ces to Caltrans. Print and deliver up to
two (2) hard copies of the Draft EA without
technical studies to Kern County Clerk. Print and
ship up to one (1) hard copy of the Draft EA
without technicalstudies to one local library.
Task 5.7.4 - Public Meeting
Caltrans has stated that they would like a public
meeting for the Draft EA. GPA will prepare a Notice
of Public Hearing (NPH) announcing the availability
of the Draft EA, where it may be obtained or
reviewed, as well as information on how and where
to submit comments for Caltrans. lt is assumed that
the NPH will be combined and circulated with the
NOA (Task 5.7.3) for purposes of our fee estimates.
The Draft EA must be available at the public hearing
and for a minimum of l5 days in advance of the
public hearing.
GPA Principal and/or Project Manager will attend up
to two strategy meetings and one public hearing
during the public comment period. For purposes of
our fee estimate, it is assumed that these meeting
will all be virtual and subject matter experts and
specialists will not need to attend. lt is also assumed that others will be responsible for organizing the
meetings, identifying meeting locations and websites,
posting notices of the meetings online, creating any
necessary presentation materials or slides, as well
as providing court reporters and Spanish
interpreters. GPA can provide a scope and cost
estimate should additional meeting support or inperson attendance be needed^ Task Deliverables - One electronic copy of the
NPH. Attend two one-hour virtual strategy
meetings (up to one hour each) and one virtual
public hearing (up to 4 hours).
Task 5.7.5 - Final EnvironmentalAssessment
At the conclusion of the public availability period,
GPA will revise the EA and prepare a First Draft
Final EA and Finding of No Significant lmpact
(FONSI) for NCM and the City to review. The revised
EA will reflect changes in the proposed action or
mitigation measures resulting from comments
received or from the public hearing, if one was held,
and include any necessary findings, agreements, or
determinations required for the proposal. A copy of
the comments and responses will also be attached to
the revised EA. The FONS|will be prepared in
accordance with Caltrans Sample FONSI, dated May
Standard Road \Mdening Project Phase 2
2020. Changes to technical analyses, including
technical studies will require a contract amendment.
GPA will respond to NCM and the City's comments
and prepare the Second Draft Final EA/FONSI for
Caltrans review. lt is assumed that the Second Draft
Final EA/FONSI will undergo one round of reviews
from NCM, the City, and Caltrans. GPA will then
respond to Caltrans'comments and prepare a
Check-Copy (i.e., Screen-Check) Final EA/FONSI for
the City and Caltrans review prior to circulation of the FONSI. The circulation requirements for a FONTI are
typically very limited, GPA will send the NOA and a
copy of the Final EA/FONSI to cooperating and
participating agencies and agencies that commented
on the Draft EA or requested to be informed of the
project decision as requested by Caltrans.
Task Deliverables - ¡ Deliverables: Print
and mail up to ten (10) hard copies of the NOA
with electronic copies of the Final EA/FONSI on
CD or DVD. Print and ship up to five (5) hard
copies of the Final EA/FONSIwith technical
studies to the City. Print and ship up to five (5)
hard copies of the Final EA/FONSI with technical
studies to Caltrans. Print and deliver up to two
(2) hard copies of the Final EA/FONSI without
technicalstudies to Kern County. Print and ship
up to one (l) hard copy of the Final EA/FONSI
without technical studies to one local library.
Assumptions
¡ This scope of work is based on the project
information provided by the NCM and the City. lf
the limits of the project area or scope of the
project change substantially, or if currently
unknown circumstances arise in a manner that
would result in greater environmental impacts,
additional scope and budget will be needed.
. Period of performance for PA/ED for the
Widening Project is up to 24 months from notice
to proceed and award of Amendment #1.
. Any encroachment permits or rights of entry
required to conduct field surveys or site visits
will be prepared and provided by others.
. This scope of work is limited to the evaluation of
existing conditions, the no-build alternative, and
one build alternative for each project. Evaluation
of additional build alternatives is not included
and may require additional scope and budget.
. A CEQA IS/MND and NEPA EA/FONSI are the
anticipated environmental documents for the
Widening Project.
. Technical studies prepared for NEPA can be
used for CEQA. All technical studies prepared in
support of the Environmental Documents will be
of Shafter E D¡v¡sion
Professional Engineering Services for
Amendment No. 1
Standard Road \Mdening Project Phase 2
a
a
a
a
prepared using the Caltrans-recommended
templates and in accordance with Caltransrecommended guidance and methodologies, including the SER. Caltrans will periodically
change templates and the annotated outlines
(AO) without prior notification. lf a deliverable is
prepared using the most current version
available, but changes are made to the template
or AO during preparation of the environmental
document, Caltrans will require that the
deliverable be consistent with the revised AO or
template. Changes or modifications to templates
or an AO during the period of performance may
require additional scope of work and budget.
FHWA review or approvalwill not be required
for either project.
lf Caltrans or the City identify the need for
additional technical studies or Environmental
Documentation that are not included herein, an
additional scope and budget will be prepared.
No relocations or displacements would result
from the proposed project.
Unless otheruvise indicated in this scope of
work, deliverables will be submitted via email or
file sharing service as either a PDF or MS Office
Suite (e.9., MS Word, Excel, or Project).
Local Assistance Proædures Manual EXHIBIT IO-H1
Cost Proposal for NCM Engineer¡ng Corp (Prime Consultant)
CITY OF SHAFTER
7TH STANDARD ROAD WIDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
COST PROPOSAL F'OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PA&ED) Note: Mark-ups ârê Not Allowed ACTUAL COST PLUS FIXED FEE Date: 12/8/2021
Consultant NCM ENGINEERING CORP (Prime)
Contract No.
DIRECT LABOR
Classification
Principal
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Sr. Roadway Engineer
Associate Roadway Eng
StaffRoadway Enigneer
Constructability Review
Staff Administration
QA/QC
Name
S. Mislinski
M. Gonzalez
S. Cadena
J. Loy
E. Moua
S. Thor
T. Walsh
R. Char
N. Haigh
Actual
Hourly
Hours Rate
148 @ $r10.00
Total
16,280
47,720
22,764
14,1'12
18,434
14,299
1,584
1,540
') \))
560
542
320
520
432 $33.1 0
32 40
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@.
$74.s0
$42"00
$44.1 0
$35.4s
$49.s0
$3850
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32 $78,80 $
LABOR COSTS (a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
(b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculations) (c) Total Direct Labor Costs [(a) + (b)]
$ 133,255
$6 763
$ t40,017
INDIRECT LABOR COSTS
(d) Fringe Benefits Rate:
(f) Overhead Rate:
(h) Gen & Admin Rate:
41.38 %
szl+ N
o¡o ø
(e) Total Fringe Benefits I(c) * (d)l
(g) Overhead [(c) . (Dl
(i) Gen & Admin [(c) * (h)ì
$ 57,939
$ 73,84s
$0
Total Overhead Rate: 94.12 o/o
(j) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)ì
(k) Total Fixed Fee t((c) + fi)) x fixed fee 10.5 o/ol
OTHER DTRECT COSTS (ODC)
1. Reproduction
2. Copying
3. Plotting
4. Transportation / Travel & Per Diem
5. Special Deliveries
6. Preliminary Real Estate Appraisals (for PR R/W Data Sheets) (I) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
$ 131,784
$ 28,539
$ 4,800
$ 880
$
$
$ 2,400
$ 550
$ 25,000
33,630
SUBCONSULTANTS'COSTS WITH NO OPTIONAL TASKS (detailed cost estimates attached) GPA Consulting
Ruettgers & Schuler
V/RECO
BSK Associates
Mclntosh & Associates
(m)TOTALSUBCONSULTANTS'COSTS $
$ 408,843
s81 009
$ 16,829
s 37,405
$ 102,956
647,042
(n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS l(l) + (m)l (o) TorAL CoSr (No OPTIONAL TASKS) l(c) + 0) + (k) + (n)l (p) OPTIONAL TASKS COST
(q) TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
$
$
$
$
680,672
981,013
13,445
994,458
Local Ass¡stance Proædures Manual EXHIBIT 10.H.1
Cost Proposal for NCM Engineêr¡ng Corp (Prime Consultant)
CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
l. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) (a) from page 1
Total Hours from page I
Average Hourly Rate
Year I
Year 2
Year 3
Average Hourly Rate
$
$
$
Average Hourly Rate
$
$
a
50.74 s3.28
55.95 Estimated Hours
50.74 x 787.8
53.28 x 1050.4
55.95 x 787.8
53.28 Yr 2 Ave Rate
55.95 Yr 3 Ave Rate
$
$
133,254.80
2626
50.74 2. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for all years (lncrease the Average Hourly Rate for ayear by proposed escalation %) Year I
Year 2
Year 3
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (multiply estimated Yo each year by total hours) Estimated %o Complete eayear
30 o/o
40%
30 V"
o/o
o/o
5 )
$
$
Year I
Year 2
Year 3
4. Calculate Total Costs Including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Total Hours eayear
787.8
1050.4
787.8
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $
Dlrect Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $
Estimate ofDirect Labor Salary Increase (transfer to page 1) = $ Cost per Year
s 39,976.44
s s5,967.02
s 44,074.03
140,017.48
133,254.80
6,762.68
NOTES:
1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the %o increasen the # ofyears ofthe contract, and a breakdorvn ofthe labor to be performed each year.
2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable.
(i.e. $250,000 x2o/ox 5 yrs: $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
3. This assumes that one year will be wroked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
Locai Assistance Proædures Manual EXHIBIT 1O-HI
Cost Proposal for NCM Eng¡neering Corp (Prime Consultant) Certification of Direct Costs
I, the undersigned, certify to the best ofmy knowledge and beliefthat all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
l. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract.
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Reeulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Reeulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services
6.48 Code ofFederal Reeulations Part 9904 - Cost Accontine Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contacts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the proejct files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certiffing:
Name: Steve Mislinski, PE Title*: President
signarure: á /..4.2-ra
/
-bmall : [email protected]
Date of Ceft: December 3,2021
Phone No.: (916) 619-8884
Address: NCM Engineering Corp
11344 Coloma Road, Suite 225
Gold River, CA95670
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract.
Prime Consultant
Proiect Management & Proiect Delivery Coordination
Roadway Design
Intersection Control Evaluation
Design Standard Decision Document Development
Project Report Development
Oversight of and Coordination with Subconsultants
Right of Way Requirements Development
Caltrans Proiect Delivery Coordination
Constructability Review
LEVEL OF EFFORT BACKUP
Cost Proposal for NCM Eng neering Corp (Pilme Co¡sultant) ENGINEERING CITY OF SHAFTER 7TH STANDARD ROAD WIDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
COST PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PROJECT APPROVAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTA'TION PHASE) NCM Manhours
lìlCM
CLIENT: CITY OF SHAFTER Datè:
Proi:
't2to8t21
ELEMENT: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES IPA&ED)
Subtotal
$5û.136$45.998
$1.081$4.545$1.720
s680
s1,720s1.288$1.040
$680
$12,591
$4,080
$13.920
s757
$1.135
$42.546
$103,032
$1,081$1,857
$29,577
6 Staff Rd
7 Constr Rev
I
Hours
260320
12 48
t6
6 1614l0
6 108
36 124
I
12 444
1098
12 48
$8.63C
$25.000
$1 69.03
'1616
$82.58
4A
$106.1E
32 $71.00
12t
16 ¡o
5 PM PE Sr. Rd Assoc Rd
$76.04
2440
48 120
280
$94.60
40 I
12 80
180
$90.09
80 12
to
1212
44 24
4060
I
24 $1 59.80
180r60
I
4 2422
2 2424
40 88
$235.95
40 40
1?1212
32 CONSULTANT STAFFCONSULTANT RATE
TASKS / SUBTASKS
Task 1 Prcject lúenagement
1 .'l Proiect Manaqement1.2 PDT Meet¡ngs,/Coordinat¡on Meetings Tast2 - - SuyeysandÛapping
2.1 Project Suruey Control2.2 Encroachment Perm¡t & Aæess Coordination2.3 ToÞoqraoh¡c Survevs2.4 Propertv Suruevs and Resolut¡on2.5 Mao Prcoarat¡on task 3 Preliminery Soils I nvætigetion
3.1 Desktop Study/Proiect Setupó.¿ Field Explorat¡on3.3 Laboratorv Testino
3.4 Soils Anavs¡s / Evaluat¡on3.5 Geotechn¡cal Report3.6 Phase I ln¡t¡al S¡te Assessment (lSA) Task 4 Prel i mi na ry Eng i neeri ng
4.1 Caltrans Sæping Meet¡ng4.2 Traffc lmpact Study4.3 lntersect¡on Control Evaluat¡on4.4 Draft Stormmter Data Report4.5 Draft Dra¡naqe ReDort4.6 Proiect Reoort4.7 Prelim¡nary Roadmy Des¡gn (30% Plans & Est¡mate)4.A Ut¡l¡ty Research, Pothol¡ng and Coordination with Purueyoß4.9 Ut¡l¡ty Confl¡ct Stud¡es4.'t0 Riqht of Way Requ¡rements Task 5 Env i ro n m e nte t Do c u m e ntati o n
5.'l Prel¡m¡nary lnit¡at¡on Document (Prelim¡nary Environmental Study)5.2 Environmental Scoping of Alternatives
5.2.1 Review of Porject lnformation
5.3 General Env¡ronmental Stud¡es
5.3.1 Commun¡ty lmpact Assessment lClA)
CIÏY OF SHAFTER
7TH STANDARD ROAD WIDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
cosT PRoPoSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVTCES (PROJECTAPPROVAL AND ENVTRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATTON pHASE) I l.t ù¡ NCM Manhours
LEVEL OF EFFORf AACKUP
Cost Proposal for NcM Eng need¡g Corp (Pilme consultant)
ENGINEERING
CORPORATION
CLIENT: CITY OF SHAFTER
ELEMENT: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PA&ED)
Date:
Proi:
12tÛ8t21
Sublotal
$319.465
5 Assoc Rd
6 Staff Rd
7 PM PE Sr. Rd QA/QC ODC Hours
$33,630 2626
$1 69.03
32 $82.58
/t0
$1 06.1 I
32 $71.00
432
$76.04
520
$94.60 _ 320 $90.09542 $159.80560 $235.95 '148
No of
Sheets
5-J.¿ No¡se Study
5.3.3 Air Qualitv Studv5.3.4 Paleontological lnvestigation Report5.3.5 Env¡ronmental Commitments Record (ECR)5.3.6 Water Qual¡V Memorandum
5.4 Bioloqical Assessment
5.4.1 Biological Resources, Natural Env¡ronment Study5.4.2 Federal Endangered Spec¡es Act Consultat¡on
5.5 Cultural Resources
5.5.'l Archaeolog¡cal Suruey Report (ASR)5.5.2 H¡storic & Architectural Resources Studies5.5.3 Cultural Resources Compl¡ance Consultat¡on Documents
5.6 Env¡ronmental Document (CEQA)
5.6.1 Adm¡n¡strat¡ve Draft ln¡t¡al Study5.6.2 Draft ln¡tial Study5.6.3 F¡nal lnit¡al Studv
5.7 Environmental Document (NEPA)
5.7.'l Agency Scoping5.7.2 Adm¡n¡strâtive Draft EA5.7.3 Draft EA5-7.4 Public Hearinq or Meet¡nq lvirtual)5.7.5 F¡na| EA
TOTAL WITH NO OPTIONAL TASKS
OPTIONAL TASKS
CONSULTANT STAFFCONSULTANT RATE
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10.H1
Cost Proposal for GPA Consulting (Subconsultant)
CITY OF SHAFTER
7TH STANDARD ROAD \ilIDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
cosT PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSTONAL ENGTNEERTNG SERVTCES (PA&ED) Norc: Mark-ups arc Nor Allosed ACTUAL COST PLUS FIXED FEE Contract No. Date: l2l8l202l
DIRECT LABOR
Consultant GPA CONSULTING (Subconsultant)
Classification
Principal Env Planner
Senior Assoc Env Planner
Senior Env Planner
Associate Env Planner
Environmental Planner
Associate Env Planner
Environmental Planner
Senior GIS Analyst
Senior Arch Historian
Senior Arch Historian
Assoc. Arch Historian
Environmental Planner
Senior Arch Historian
ArchHisotrian, II
Senior Biologist
Senior Biologist
Environmental Planner
Associate Biologist
Biologist
Biologist
Biologist
Biologist
Biologist
Sr. Biologist
Senior Assoc Biologist
LABOR COSTS
Name
Richard Galvin
Erinn Silva
George Gorman
Danielle Thayer
Noeli Topete
Nicole Greenfield
Alen Estrada-Rodas
Martin Rose
Laura O'Neill
Jenna Kachour
Amanda Duane
Isabella Burch
Allison Lyons
Audrey von Ahrens
Jennifer Johnson
Sheri Mayta
Justin Nguyen
Katherine Wamer
Lizbeth Pliego
Hannath Hart
Mario Mayo
Patrick Griggs
Cory Quon
Angela Scudiere
Marieka Schrader
Hours
Actual
Hourly
Rate
s76.92
s57.tf)
$52"8S
S33"05
$2Slt5
200
22 82
$3 r .73
$48.08 $
176 @, $29.63
38 204
30 s41.ó5
36 Cù s2v14
140 @,
68 Gò,
192 Aò,
t20
$41.2s
$51.98
s24.04
$3534
Total
s 3,077
$ 6,000
$ 21,4t6
$ 1,454
$ 12,983
6,346
s 5,215
751 $ 1,163 $ 2,593
$ r,566 $ 5,885
1,250 $ r,071
s 5,77 5
$ 3,s3s
$ 4,616
4,241
$ 240
$
$
6,tt9
192
$ 0
$0
$0
$ 2J36
$52.88
s44J1
$4120
$2S^S5
Gù,
@,
GÙ
@,
cù
@,
@,
GÙ
@)
@,
40 04
405
44 450
58 I @ $3o.oo
202 @ $30.29
s24.04
s24.04
$24.04
$50/8
@
@,
@,
@
Ca
8 0
0 0
36 $64.90
(a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
(b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculations) (c) Total Direct Labor Costs [(a) + (b)l
105,822
$0
$ 105,822
INDIRECT LABOR COSTS
(d) Fringe Benefits Rate: 43.76 %
(f) Overhead Rate: -- 41Vl- oto
(h) Gen & Admin Rate: -- SSÑ- V'
(e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) * (d)]
(g) Overhead [(c) * (Ðì
(i) Gen & Admin [(c) * (h)]
$ 46,308
$ 48,054
$ 56,3ól
Total Overhead Rate: 142.43 y"
(j) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)ì
(k) Total Fixed Fee t((c) + (j)) x fixed fee 10.5 %l
OTHER DTRECT COSTS (ODC)
1. Copying
2. Transportation / Travel
3. Shipping
4. Outside Specialist Services (Filing & Court Processing Fees)
5. Outside Specialist Services (Air Quality/GHG, Noise, Archaeology & Paleontology) (D TOTAL OTHER DTRECT COSTS
$ 150,723
$ 26,937
s 32,632
$ 3,046
$ 5,095
$ 2,598
$81 990
$ 125,361
(n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS I(l) + (m)ì (o) TOTAL COST (No OPTIONAL TAsKs) [(c) + CI) + (k) + (n)] (p) OPTIONAL TASKS COST (see Level of Effort Backup on Page 4 of 4) (q) TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
$ 125,361
$ 408,843
$
$ 408,843
Loæl Assistance Procedures l\4anual EXHIBIT IO-H1
Cost Proposal for GPA Consulting (Subconsultant)
CALCULATIONS F'OR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
l. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for lst year ofthe contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) (a) from page I
Total Hours from page I
Average Hourly Rate $
105,822.20
2763
38.30 2. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation o/o) $
Year I
Year I
Year 2
Year 3
Year I
Year 2
Year 3
38.30 40.21
42.23 Average Hourly Rate
$
$
$
Average Hourly Rate
s
$
$
5 5
o//o
o/
$
$
40.21 Yr 2 Ave Rate
Year 2 42.23 Yr 3 Ave Rate
Year 3
3. Calculate estimated hours peryear (multiply estimated %oeachyearby total hours) Estimated o/o Complete ea year
100 0/o
0 o/o
0 "/o
Total Hours ea year
2763
0 0
4. Calculate Total Costs Including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours)
38.30 x
40.21 x
42.23 x
2763
0 0
Estimated Hours Cost per Year
s 10s,822.20 $-
$
105,822.20
105,822.20
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $
Direct Labor Subtotal before Bscalation = $
Estimate of Dlrect Labor Salary Increase (transfer to page 1) = $ NOTES:
l. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # ofyears ofthe contract, and a breakdown ofthe labor to be performed each year.
2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable.
(i.e. $250,000 x 2%o x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
3. This assumes that one year will be wroked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
Certification of Direct Costs
I, the undersigned, certift to the best ofmy knowledge and beliefthat all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements :
Local Assistance Procedures Manual
cosr proposar for Gpo
""""rn'"n
fJl'"""'lll;l;
l. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions ofthe contract.
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code ofFederal Resulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Requlations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services
6. 48 Code ofFederal Reeulations Part 9904 - Cost Accontine Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contacts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the proejct files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant CertiÍ!ing:
Name: Richard Galvin Title*: Vice President
Date of Cert: 12/3/2021
Email: [email protected] Phone No.: 310-792-2690 Address: 201 Nevada Street. Suite B
El Segundo, C1.90245
*An individual executive or financial officer ofthe consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a ChiefFinancial Officer, or equivalent who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract.
Environmental technical studies and documentation
df OF SHAFER
WDdINO ÞROJECI AMENDMEU H G P¡.
12t0&21
træ.æ7.7is11.313.1:
CO¡SULIANT MEbhnñd'I Dd.Lñer.ilon
1A
53. i2
2A
1a
s.ft & .. !99 , ..9r4 51offi! s2s.e 5roøs
12.ú Þ.m iæ :!6 .. --1!
I
r5 15 15
2 91
I
I
10 12 16
21 Æ
3 cuhÉl R€[email protected]ßubtoñ
5_6'
5.7 5.7-2 DEff a 2
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 1O-HI
Cost Proposal for Ruettgers Schuler (Subconsultant)
CITY OF SHAF'TER
7TH STANDARD ROAD WIDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
cosr pRoposAl, FoR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PA&ED) Note: Mark-ups âre Not Allowed ACTUAL COST PLUS FIXED FEE Consultant RUETTGERS & SCHULER (Prime)
Contract No
DIRECT LABOR
Date: 4/212020
Hours
Actual
Hourly
Rate
$62.s0
Classification
Managing Principal
Principal Engineer
Project Manager
Design Engineer
Design Engineer
ROW Specialist
Staff Engineer
Eng Tech 3
Eng Tech 3
Eng Tech 2
Eng Tech 2
Eng Tech I
Name
John D. Schuler
Ian J. Parks
Lloyd L. Norton
Trent D. Miller
Linda J. Hakimi
Shelia K. Palne
Mark E. Assi
Michael A. Serapiglia
D. Jared Meadows
Andrew C. Binning
Shalisha S. Hodson
Kyle T. Lopez
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
92 4
0 8
34 I
Total
5,750
$62.s0
$70.00
$52.00
$52J0
875
0 416
6,968
8 6
$50.48 404
$46.95
$40J5
751
324
2A $33.41 668
16 $31.65 506
128 $25.50 3,264
12@ $24.75 $ 2,772
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
LABOR COSTS (a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
(b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculations) (c) Total Direct Labor Costs [(a) + (b)]
s 22,699
$ 284
$ 22,983
INDIRECT LABOR COSTS
(d) Fringe Benefits Rate:
(f) Overhead Rate:
(h) Gen & Admin Rate:
Total Overhead Rate
34.98 o/o
SS.1A ol"
+Yn y"
(e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) * (d)l
(g) Overhead I(c) * (Ðl
(i) Gen & Admin I(c) * (h)ì
$ 8,039
s 12,677
s 9,929
133.34 Yo
fi) Total Indirect Costs l(e) + (g) + (i)l
(k) Total Fixed Fee t((c) + fi)) x fixed fee 10.5 %l
$ 30,645
s 5,631
orHER DTRECT COSTS (ODC)
1. Trafüc Counts
2. Potholing
3. Plotting
4. Transportation / Travel & Per Diem
5. Special Deliveries
6. Miscellaneous
$ 1,500
$ 20,000
(r) TorAL orHER DIRECT COSTS 21,750
SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS WITH NO OPTIONAL TASKS (detailed cost estimates attached) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS 0
(n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS t0) + (m)l 2l 750 (o) TOTAL Cosr (No OPTIONAL TASKS) [(c) + (i) + (k) + (n)] (p) OPTIONAL TASKS COST
(q) TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
81,009
$
$
$
$
$
25 0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 81,009
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 1O-H1
Cost Proposal for Ruettgers Schuler (Subconsultant)
CALCULATIONS F'OR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
l. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for I st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) (a) from page I
Total Hours from page I
Average Hourly Rate
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Average Hourly Rate
$
$
$
Average Hourly Rate
$
$
$
$
$
22,699.04
556
40.83 2. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation 7o) Year I
Year 2
Year 3
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (multiply estimated o/o each year by total hours) Estimated %o Complete eayear
75 o/o
25 Y"
0%
40.83 42.87
45.01 5
5 o/o
%
$
$
42.87 Yr 2 Ave Rate
45.01 Yr 3 Ave Rate
Year I
Year 2
Year 3
4. Calculate Total Costs Including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Total Hours eayeaî
417
139
0 Estimated Hours
40.83 x 417
42.87 x 139
45.01 x 0
Cost per Year
$
$
$
17,024.28
5,958.50
22,982.78
22,699.04
283.74
Total Direct Latlor Cost with Escalation : $
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation : $
Estimate ofDirect Labor Salary Increase (transfer to page 1) = $ NOTES:
l. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the 7o increase, the # ofyears ofthe contract, and a breakdown ofthe labor to be performed each year.
2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable.
(i.e. $250,000 x2%ox 5 yrs: $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
3. This assumes that one year will be wroked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
Certification of Direct Costs
Pagè 2 of 4
Local Ass¡stance Proædures Manual
cost proposar for Rr"nn"r" ,"nr,u, f{I'iJnt lLåÏll
I, the undersigned, certiff to the best ofmy knowledge and beliefthat all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
l. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract.
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code ofFederal Resulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Resulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services
6. 48 Code of Federal Resulations Part 9904 - Cost Accontins Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contacts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the proejct files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying
Name: John D. Schuler Title*: Partner
Signature: Date of Cert: April2,2020
Email: ¡[email protected] Phone No.: 661-327 -1969
Address: 1800 30th Street Suite 260
Bakersfield, CA 93301
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract.
Traffic Impact Studies
Intersection Control Evaluation
Utility Studies, Mapping, Conflict Studies & Coordination
CITY OF SHAFTER
7TH STANDARD ROAD WIDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
COST PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES {PROJECT APPROVAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION PHASE} RUETTGERS & SCHULER ManhouF
LEVELOF EFFORT BACXUP
Cost Proposeltor Ruetþe6 Schubr (Subænsbnt)
RurrrcrRs ftSCHtILER
CrUL LlclNE[Rs
CUENT: CITY OF SHAFTER
ELEMENT: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PA&ÊD)
Date
Pro¡
o4l02t20
Subtotal
$43.222$10,223$23.148
s3 684
s80.277
1 2 4 7 8
Menl Des400
9831
556
$1,500
s250
$20.000
921-7SO
s63.E2
8824
112
$65.75
100
28 128
$E1.61
II
IG
$86.14
2020
s104.55
44 I
s1 2 1.06
16 l6
s1:r0.16
44 I
$t 34.UE
9230
4 '134
tt't34.oa
44I
s 1ti 1 .15 $1 80.49
8 4
14 ti1 61 .1 5
12 22
92 CONSULTANT STAFFCONSULTANT RATE
TASKS/SUBTASKS.
Task 4 Prcliminary Engineering
4.2 Traffic lmpact Studv4.3 lntersect¡on Control Evaluation4.8 Ut¡l¡ty Research, Potholing and Coord¡nation w¡th Purueyors4.9 Ut¡l¡ty Confl¡ct Studies
TOTALWITH NO OPTIONAL TASKS
OPTIONAL TASKS
Loæl Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT,IO-HI
Cost Proposal for WRECO (Subconsultant)
CITY OF SHAF'TER
7TH STAIIDARD ROAD WIDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
COST PROPOSAL F'OR PROF'ESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PA&ED) Note; Mårk-ups are Not Allowed ACTUAL COST PLUS FIXED FEE Contract No Date: 41212020
DIRECT LABOR
Consultant WRECO (Subconsultant)
Classification
Principal Engineer
Supervising Engineer
Supervising Engineer
Senior Engineer
Associate Engineer
StaffEngineer
StaffEnv. Scientist
Senior Technician
Clerical/Tech Editor
Name
H. Liang
A. Ochoa
C. Sewell
Multiple Staff
Multiple Staff
Multiple Staff
Multiple Staff
M. Du
Multiple Staff
Actual
Hourly
Hours Rate
4 @ $101.67
$84.06
$73.91
$70.53
$45.00
$3s.22
$31"00
$3L??
4 $30.1 6
Total
407
168
443
846
1,800
1,409
496
524
121
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
2 6
2 40
40 6
6 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
LABOR COSTS (a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
(b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculations) (c) Total Direct Labor Costs l(a) + (b)l
$ 6,214
$o
$ 6,214
INDIRECT LABOR COSTS
(d) Fringe Benefits Rate:
(f) Overhead Rate:
(h) Gen & Admin Rate:
Total Overhead Rate:
70.36 yo
zzn N
ssn y,
(e) Total Fringe Benefits l(c) * (d)l
(g) Overhead [(c) * (f)]
(i) Gen & Admin [(c) * (h)l
s 4,372
$ 2,008
$ 2,182
137.80 o/o
fi) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (C) + (Ðl
(k) Total Fixed Fee l((c) + (j)) x fixed fee 10.5 o l
$
$
8,563
1,552
OTHER DTRECT COSTS (ODC)
L Reproduction and Overnight Shipment/Delivery
2. Copying
3. Laboratory Testing
4. Transportation / Travel & Per Diem
$ 200.00
$
$
$ 300.00
(I) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 500
SUBCONSULTANTS'COSTS WITH NO OPTIONAL TASKS (detailed cost estimates attached) (m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS 0
(n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] (o) TorAL COST (No OPTIONAL TASKS) l(c) + (i) + (k) + (n)Ì (p) OPTIONAL TASKS COST
(q) TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
$
$
$
s
s00
16,829
16,829
Local Assistance Proædures Manual EXHIBIT IO-H1
Cost Proposal for WRECO (Subconsultant)
CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
l. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for I st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) (a) from page I
Total Hours from page I
Average Hourly Rate
Year 1
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Average Hourly Rate
$
$
$
$
$
6,214.38
140
44.39 2. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for all years (lncrease the Average Hourly Rate for ayear by proposed escalation %)
44.39 46.61
48.94 5
5 o/o
%
$
$
46.61 Yr 2 Ave Rate
Year 2 48.94 Yr 3 Ave Rate
Year 3
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (multiply estimated %o each year by total hours) Estimated % Complete eayear
Year I
Year 2
Year 3
Average Hourly Rate
$
$
$
100 o/o
0 o/o
0 o/o
Total Hours ea year
140
0 0
4. Calculate Total Costs Including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Estimated Hours
44.39 x 140
46.61 x 0
48.94 x 0
Cost per Year
$ 6,214.38
$
$
6,214.38
6,214.38
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $
Direcf Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $
Estimate of Direct Labor Salary Increase (transfer to page 1) = $ NOTES:
l. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the oá increase, the # ofyears ofthe contract, and a breakdown ofthe labor to be performed each year.
2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable.
(i.e. $250,000 x2o/ox 5 yrs: $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
3. This assumes that one year will be wroked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
Local Assistance Proædures Manual
Certification of Direct Costs:
I, the undersigned, certi$ to the best ofmy knowledge and beliefthat all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
l. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract.
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code ofFederal Reeulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Reeulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services
6.48 Code ofFederal Requlations Part 9904 - Cost Accontine Standards Board (when applicable) Al1 costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contacts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the proejct files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
Name: Han-Bin Liang, Ph.D., P.E. Title*: President
EXHIBIT IO-H1
Cost Proposal for WRECO (Subconsultant)
Date of Cert: 41212020
Email: hanbin [email protected] Phone No.: (925\ 941-0017 x201 Address: 1243 Alpine Road, Suite 108, Walnut Creek,CA94596 *An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract.
Signature: q1^&(
Draft Stormwater Data Report
Preliminary Drainage Report
CITY OF SHAFTER
7TH STANDARD ROAD WDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
LEVEL OF EFFORT BACKUP
Cct PropoÉl for WRECO (SubôoEultànt)
urneut COST PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERII/ICES (PROJECT APPROVAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATON PHASE} WRECO Manhours
Subtotãl
s7.762
$9.068
sl6-e29
Tolal
HÕuß
318322â¿o
oDc
$250$2501500
I
Clèricâl /
Tech Editor
s79.25
22I
I
Senior
Techn¡c¡ân
$86.1 1
II
l6
7 Stãfi Env.
Scient¡st
't6
l6
R
$92.\
t6
24 4I)
7\
Date:
Proi:
oqoazg
tf
\ 10
7 v5
Associate
Enq¡neèr
$1 18.25
-^.
l6
24 L^¿r\,:Ð
-
u
\-6 I
3 Superv¡s¡ng
Eno¡neer
$194.21
./
I
24 2
ng
Eno¡néer
$220.88
1 -1
I
L
1 Principal
Eno¡neer
$267.10
I
3 4
No of
Sheets
CLIENT: GITY OF SHAFTER
ELEMENT: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICETS
CONS¡ULTANT STAFFCONSULTANT RATE
Tesk 1
4.4 Draft StorÍrEter Dala Report4.5 Prelim¡nary Drainaqe Report TOTAL T¡I'ITH NO OPTIONAL TASI(S
OPÎONAL TASKS
Pqe4oî4
Loæl Assistanæ Procedures Manual EXHIBIT,IO-HI
Cost Proposal for BSK Assoc¡ates (Submnsu¡tant)
CITY OF'SHAFTER
7TH STANDARD ROAD \üIDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
COST PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES ßA&ED) Note: Mârk-ups are Not Allowed ACTUAL COST PLUS FIXED FEE Contract No. Date: llll2/2021
DIRECT LABOR
Consultant BSK Associates (Subconsultant)
Classification
Principal Geotech Engineer
Senior Geotech Engineer
Senior Geologist
Proj ect Professional II
StaffEngineer II
Staff Engineer II
Group 3 Soils Journeyman
Drafting
Administrative Assistant
Name
On Man Lau
Neva Popenoe
Tony Martin
Kevin Grove
Amy Xu
Visente Simental
Tiffani Gonzalez
Carmen Chacon
Hours
Actual
Hourly
Rate
$70.00
Total
420
1,295
1,212
823
7,440
0 2,819
288
240
6 @
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@,
6 22 $58.8s
$7s.72
$43.40
$30.00
$30.00
$54.21
$24.00
$24.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
ô
ù
42 48
0 52
2 0
LABOR COSTS (a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $
(b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculations) $ (c) Total Direct Labor Costs [(a) + (b)] $
9,536
0 9,536
INDIRECT LABOR COSTS
(d) Fringe Benefits Rate
(f) Overhead Rate:
(h) Gen & Admin Rate:
Total Overhead Rate:
55.38 Yo
147.93 Yo
0.00 o/o
(e) Total Fringe Benefits l(c) * (d)ì
(g) Overhead I(c) * (Dl
(i) Gen & Admin [(c) * (h)l
$ 5,281
$ 14,107
$0
203.32 o/o
fi) Total lndirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (Ðl
(k) Total Fixed Fee I((c) + CI)) x fixed fee 10.5 Vol
$
$
190388
3,037
OTHER DTRECT COSTS (ODC)
1. EDR Report ($400.00 per report)
2. Laboratory Testing
3. Drill Rig
4. Mileage ($0.575 per mile)
$ 400.00
$ 4,900.00
$
$ 143.75
TOTALOTHERDIRECTCOSTS $ 5,444
SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS \üITH NO OPTIONAL TASKS (detailed cost estimates attached)
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS
(n) TOTAL OTHERDIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] 5,444 (o) roTAL COST (No OPTIONAL TASKS) [(c) + fi) + (k) + (n)l (p) OPTIONAL TASKS COST
(q) TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
37,405
37,405
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
s
s
0
Loæ¡ Ass¡stanæ Proædures Manual EXHIBIT IO.HI
Cost Proposal for BSK Associates (Subconsultant)
CALCULATIONS F'OR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
I . Calculate Average Hourly Rate for I st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) (a) from page 1
Total Hours from page 1
Average Hourly Rate
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year I
Year 2
Year 3
Average Hourly Rate
$
$
$
Average Hourly Rate
$
$
$
$
$
9,535.94
208
45.85 2. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %o)
45.85 48.14
50.55 5
5 o/o
o/o
$
$
48.14 Yr 2 Ave Rate
50.55 Yr 3 Ave Rate
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (multiply estimated o/o each year by total hours) Estimated % Complete eayear
Year I
Year 2
Year 3
4. Calculate Total Costs Including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 700 o/o
0 o/o
0Yo
Total Hours eayear
208
0 0
Estimated Hours
45.85 x 208
48.14 x 0
50.55 x 0
Cost per Year
9,535.94
9,535.94
9,535.94
$
$
$
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $
Estimate of Direct Labor Salary Increase (transfer to page l) = $ NOTES:
1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the %o increase, the # ofyears ofthe contract, and a breakdown ofthe labor to be performed each year.
2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable.
(i.e. $250,000 x2%ox 5 yrs: $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
3. This assumes that one year will be wroked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
Local Assistance Proædures Manual EXHIBIT IO-H1
Cost Proposal for BSK Associates (Subconsultanl)
following requirements
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract.
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Resulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services
6. 48 Code ofFederal Resulations Part 9904 - Cost Accontins Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contacts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the proejct files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certi$ing:
Name**. Richard E John T'itle*t PresidenlCFO
Signature: 12t3t2021
Email** ohnson@ BSKAssociates. com
Address: 550 W. Locust Avenue
Date of Ceft ification (nr nr/dd/yyyy)
phone Nurnbsr**. 91 6-853-9293
Fresno l-A Q?Á5O
*An individual executive or financial officer ofthe consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract.
Geotechnical field exploration and laboratory testing
Geotechnical design report preparation
Phase t hazardous materials site assessment
CITY OF SHAFTER
7TH STANDARD ROAD WIDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
COST PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PROJECT APPROVAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTANON PHASE) BSK ASSOCIATES Manhoure
LEVEL OF EFFORÍ BACKUP
Cost Proposâl lo¡ BSK Associates (Subconsultent)
Eë¡-{ ASSOCIATES
CLIENT: CITY OF SHAFTER Date:
P roi:
11t't2t21
ELEMENT: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PA&ED)
Subtotal
$2,5s9
$9.592$5,294$4,930$4.139
$1 0,892
s37.405
1 2 J 4
Project
Professional ll
5 6 7 I
Admin
Assislant
Princ¡pal Sen¡or Sen¡or Staff Staff Group 3Geotech Geotech il oDc Hours 22 Ê1
2 383262
20a
$144
$4 900
$400
s5.444
$80.44
2224
10 $80.44
I
4 12
$181 .69
5252
s1 00.55 $100.55
16 1616
48 $1 45.46
4242
$253.79
16 16
$197.25
42II
22 s234.62
4 26
CONSULTANT STAFFCONSULTANT RATE
TASKS / SUBTASKS
Task 3 Prelimi narv Soils I nvesf¡oafion
Desktop Study/Project Setup
3.2 F¡eld Exploration3.3 Laboratorv Testinq3.4 Soils Analysis / Evaluation3.5 Geolechnical Report3.6 Phase I ln¡t¡al S¡te Assessment (lSA)
TOTAL WITH NO OPTONAL TASKS
OPTIONAL TASKS
Local Assistanæ Proædures l\¡anual EXHIBIT IO-H1
Cost Proposal for Mclntosh Associates (Subconsultant)
CITY OF SHAFTER
7TH STANDARD ROAD WIDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
COST PROPOSAL F'OR ADDITIONAL SIIRVEYING - SR43 & 7th STD.
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed ACTUAL COST PLUS FIXED FEE Contract No. Date: 12/812021
DIRECT LABOR
Classification
Sr. Land Surveyor
Office Engineer
1 Man Crew
2 Man Crew
3 Man Crew
2-Man Crew Travel
1 Man Travel
Consultant MCINTOSH & ASSOCIATES (Subconsultant)
Name
Don Britton
Mark Nistor
James'Watson
'Watson & Henneberry
Watson, Henneberry, VanCuren
Vy'atson & Henneberry
James Watson
Hours Total
3,141
Actual
Hourly
Rate
$98. I 5
$65.85
s68.72
$138.11
$206.1 0
$51 .08
$37.08
7,902
r00
)L 1))
0 1,175
74 0
0 16
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
32 20
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
79 0
23 2
0 0
LABOR COSTS (a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $
(b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculations) $ (c) Total Direct Labor Costs [(a) + (b)] $
38,1 13
1,453
39,566
INDIRECT LABOR COSTS
(d) Fringe Benefits Rate:
(f) Overhead Rate:
(h) Gen & Admin Rate:
Total Overhead Rate:
36.03 o/o
94.20 o/o
0.00 o/o
(e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) * (d)ì
(g) Overhead [(c) * (Ðl
(i) Gen & Admin [(c) * (h)ì
s 14,2s6
s 37,271
s0
130.23 Yo
fi) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)ì
(k) Total Fixed Fee t((c) + (i)) x fixed fee 10.5 Vol
$
$
51,527
9,565
OTHER DTRECT COSTS (ODC)
1. BV/ Print ($3.00 per sheet)
2. Title Reports (previously obtained)
3. Materials ($0.50 per unit)
4. Mileage ($0.575 per mile)
$
$
$
$
$
2,177.00
6.00 I 1 5.00
(r) TOTAL OTHER DTRECT COSTS 2,298
SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS WITH NO OPTIONAL TASKS (detailed cost estimates attached) (m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS 0
(n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] (o) ToTAL CoSr (No OPTIONAL TASKS) t(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)l (p) OPTIONAL TASKS COST
(q) TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
$
$
$
$
2,298
102,956
102,956
Local Ass¡stance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT IO-HI
Cost Proposal for Mclntosh Associates (Subænsullant)
CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for lst year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) (a) from page I
Total Hours from page I
Average Hourly Rate
Year I
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Average Hourly Rate
$
$
$
$
$
38,113.01
372
102.4s
2. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) 102.45
107.58
112.96
5 5
$
$
ot/o
o/o
107.58 Yr 2 Ave Rate
Year 2 112.96 Yr 3 AveRate
Year 3
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (multiply estimated %o each year by total hours) Estimated o/o Complete ea year
Year I
Year 2
Year 3
Average Hourly Rate
$
$
$
50 o/o
25 o/o
25 Yo
Total Hours ea year
186
93 93
4. Calculate Total Costs Including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Estimated Hours
102.45 x 186
107.58 x 93
112.96 x 93
Cost per Year
$ 19,056.51
$ 10,004.67
$ 10,504.90
39,566.07
38,113.01
1,453.06
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation: $
Estimate of Direct Labor Salary Increase (transfer to page 1) : $ NOTES:
1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the o¿ increase, the # ofyears ofthe contract, and a breakdown ofthe labor to be performed each year.
2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable.
(i.e. $250,000 x2Yox 5 yrs : $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
3. This assumes that one year will be wroked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
Local Assistânc€ Procedures Manual EXHIBIÏ 1O.HI
Cost Proposal for Mclntôsh Assoclatos (Subconsultant)
Certification of Dlrect Costs:
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belíef that all direct costs identifted on the cost proposal(s) itt this conttact are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contlact in acçordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
L Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract.
3, Tjftp. ?J,Uniteel States.-C-,o".4e.Section I 12 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Fedeml Regulations Part 3l - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5.23 Code of Federal Reeulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineeling and Þesign Related Services
6. 48 Cof!.ç_of Federal Resulatlons Pa{t 9904 - Cost Accontins Standafdp l}oard (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contacts. All documentation of conpliance must be retained in the prnejct files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible fol reimbursement, Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agençy approved or Caltrans accepted Indírect Cost Rate(s).
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifoing:
Name Title*: President
Date of Cert: 12108t2021
Email : [email protected] Pho¡re No.: (661) n3-A404 Address: 2001 Wheelan Ct.
Bakersfield. CA 93309
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultanfs or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Offrcer, or equivalent who has authority to tepresent the frnancial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
List services the consultant is ploviding under the proposed contract, Land Survevine
Pag€ 3 of 4
CITY OF SHAFTER
7TH STANDARD ROAD WDENING PROJECT PHASE 2
LEVEL OF EFFORÍ BACKUP
C6t Proposel for Mclnt6h Associâtes (Subconsultânt)
COST PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING
MCINTOSH
SERVICES
& ASSOCIATES
(PROJECTAPPROVAL
Manhours
AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATON PHASÊ) ffir
CLIENT: CITY OF SHAFTER
ELEMENT: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER¡NG SERVICES IPA&ED)
Date:
Proi:
12tO8t2'l
Subtotal
$67,523$32,694
g't00.217
Total
Hours
262
'110
372
oDc
s31 0
$2.946
$3,256
I
M¡leage
7 1 Man Travel
$94.33
2 2
lufs bv (;lass
6 2 Man Travel
$1 29.95
4 19
23 Labor ¡
5 3-Man Crew
$524.33
4 2-Man Crew
$351.36
't 19
60 179
3 'l-Man Crew
$174.83
to
l6
Off Ënqr
$167.53
105
tc
120
1 Sr. LS
$249.70
1814
32 CONSULTANT STAFFCONSULTANT RATE
TASKS / SUBTASKS
T"sk 2 and
2.1 Topographic Surueys2.2 Property Lines and Base Map Preparation
TOTAL WITH NO OPTIONAL TASKS
OPTONAL TASKS
A
11 ,t, or-l
City of Shafter
S}IAFIER COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date:
FROM:
March I,2022
Gabriel A. Gonzalez, City Manager
Prepared By: Michael James, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: STRINGHAM PARK BUS STOP PROJECT FOR FORMAL BIDDING
RECOMMENDATION
Council find the requested action is not a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act; approve the construction plans and contract documents for the Stringham Park Bus Stop-Bus Bay Project; and authorize the release of said project for formal bid purposes.
BACKGROUND
Construction plans and contract documents for bidding have been prepared for a project to construct a new transit bus stop at Stringham Park. Before preparing the bid package, City staff mutually agreed with Kern County staff to collaboratively work towards relocating the County regional transit stop from the City Hall parking lot to improve bus access and safety for the passengers.
As designed, the new bay for a bus stop consists of widening a portion of James Street to allow buses to pull off the southbound travel lanes to drop off and pick up passengers. Constructing the bay requires of relocation of an existing ADA-rated ramp. All work items combined are estimated to cost $72,000, requiring the Council to approve plans and contract documents for bid pu{poses.
Combined, $191,260 in State of Good Repair (SGR) Program funds have been allocated to the project.
This project is the first phase of transit-related improvements at Stringham Park. The next phase will be purchasing and installing a bus shelter for passengers. In addition, a parking lot has been designed for development at the south end of the park to facilitate park-and-ride transit passengers and potential electric vehicle charging stations for the public. Last month, the shelter and parking lot phases were proposed for grant funding through the Clean California Grant Program.
FISCAL IMPACT
No budget action is required at this time. The City's Engineering operational budgets can fund costs related to project bidding. Once project bids are opened, staff will likely present budget outlooks and amendments to cover the construction costs at a future meeting.
MANAGEMENT REPORT nb
Stringham Park Bus Stop Project for Formal Bidding
CEQA ANALYSIS
The proposed activity is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not defined as a "Project" pursuant to Section 15378(bX5) of the CEQA Guidelines. The action is organization or administrative activities of governments that does not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.
ALTERNATIVES
Reasons to reject the staff recommendations could include retaining the County regional bus stop at City Hall or focusing on recreational improvement at Stringham Park rather than transit-related improvements. However, the current City Hall stop has minimal seating and street access, plus it is immediately next to a State Highway. As recently as 2018, a vehicular accident resulted in the bus shelter being damaged from an oncoming car. Secondly, the design of future improvements at Stringham Park preserves and enhances visual appeal and recreational opportunities pursued if properly funded. Therefore, alternative action is not recommended.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Bid Plan Set for Stringham Park Bus Stop - Bus Bay Project Pùonu{661)7tr-t002 ¡Àr(661)746-912,
trGNßruNG SERVICES DEPÆTWNT
CITY OF STIAFTER
STRINGTIAM PARK BUS STOP
BUSTURNOW
Ct I
o
-\fl 1l -l ñ
äEllö
=i
llg
Ët F
ãl
[E
ll.r
lll.
tslt
l=f,
-pÊc
e p r ro o6.
Ëã48ãHã
EËqËtãi
ÊË " E
õÈ
s
qsa85qzEq*:+T
-----+.1
l¡
ãE
'Eã*
þE
!6
a
8n
àt
dd
;E
äñH
qI
süIa
(t) m
c)Ioz.
9EPE
d-
¡ì
ÈçãH
ãËËE
¡;iã Iå7
flðHgg=H
aãðq
ã9Cè
tss3=
P=lÞ
99=-
Ã46¿
';Êrs
STATE AVEgÉr= I= gé ñfI
Iilooez{
:0maozÍ@cø
It{ot
c3møø+
ñg
1t
Ëi
E3
åðEfq
sqì I E
É88
=3s
Fq
áñ
Eq
qâcE
é9
5*
Eñ
dË
e;
\
Ë$
s:
ÈÞ s
Ìc{cFm!vãzoro
-{
3*Ë
td
lÕ
lm
lmEoJuØ--{ v
z.
6J-=!7x6c
cn
cn
--{ oT
¡äËs
;9çE
fihÍ*
3ad¡
i4¡g
fiñtE
azrz
i¡àë¿
ã2ü)E
ãðãñ
õ142
\F ¿<
Ëiäë
Aí" a
ãE i
gn
¡
äååËËgËËãEiËËã
åËärËi¡ffiäËËËË
IËäEåäËËääEiãi
E#gã;ËiËËc!iE¡
ä¡Ë 9iïËõ$:Íës
EäãËfËËã'ägäË
ooI
ll
lo
lz
lo
t;p I3¿
frIdÈ\zÈ
TMuz
oô
0mmm
oI
@2
lo
rHz=
i*!ã mouT
oo3I
> >-õi
3ñF;
tro€o,oL=oz
€
.l
å*
IE
TI F
+
ìg
('
ri,,
$flI
FOR BID PURP()SES
ENGIMERNG SIRVICES DEPÆTMM
116PrÊificArñue sfrânù cÄ 91261
Phonet66l)7ft.5002 F.\(66ì746-9¡2'
CITY OF SI{AFTER
STRING¡TAM PARK BUS STOP
STANDARDS & DETNIS
çN)
N
U)
I
m
m
I
.q
:BgËãËËåEãråå¡ËEË¡å!
ãËå;åÊåËËååËËËå'iåå
åååãåå¡'EË:ËãåË
dp
Ëã
'le3
3s¡
ãd
dex
¡dts
JÈë
lir
E
E
ãÃ
!;
6g
¡F
¡È
!
ã
r
2 !
t
ã:Ë åå :¡ åÊ
;E
;ã; :r Èã
:Ë lË
;-i :: àÈ åã :å
'åiåËË;åsåË
Ë¡ EsË:åsã
;Ê
g
tååãå
EË i i¡Ê Ë
'9 å ËËå ¡
"':ãñÈÞ !e
3iP å;
ìtR Ec
;:r s:
ã!ËËã
:ë ¡¡
!s
gE
õ3 ÃË
ga :e
cãì
à-Ë
ãi ëã
i3 ãå ¡ç
;å å TË:
ãä : lëi
:Ë ËI4
4Ã
c:
t
t
z
ô
F
o
c
q
ç
È
À
å
¡
E
I
fr
ä:
ee
3ã
t1
ãã
l:
Er
äg
2 i
ãåäËåËËåË
åå:5ËËåå
!Eåi'
s¿¡
F¡ds
Hg
ãã;Ë
EãE:
:åEÊ
Ë3i:
2=E¿
ã:Ëå
ðçEë
tcÃi
lË
zÈ
È;
åà
!À
rÉ
Í
ËEEiEE Ëå:å
,:ïE
ËËiåË!ã;
;åÊgË TËË
"""H
ãËåËä åEå
å;ãEå !åË
ËËã:i
:åE
à2éei
"Ti::Ë
;;gäå
s¿;ËçF
Eå¡:i
åås:
å F EFËË
å"'"ËqåËs - *::È ièF,
q
v
,
¡
ååï¡Ëili;!!qg¡
åËãåå
ãågËË
:ð¡:å
!ËqÈ
isãã
ã'ã
åë!
årE
Ëã:
.B:
É:
¡:
Þ
!P
Eå
Ee
z6
Eá
XE
rø
I
igåèg::È
r:ã:;åÈ
ËÉ¡E"'¿i
;åËãåF:
ÊtcËg;:
sËË:E:å
¡ã:Ër6E
ååe!É:ã
;Ê ã"áÈ
;ë
è¡t
e
9å59
qãÀE
flr¡ Ë:r-É
Ã!râ 9Èíã
Ëå:s õdã
Ëâ: !eå
!.i å¡ã
:Eø :óI
ËBH
gü;
Ë¡l at
Jq
lle
lr
I
å
?
ã
Ê
H
åãåå ååååËåãååååãå¡ËËË;åååËåååËåååËååãiËåå Ëåãååå¡Ë¡ÊåËååiååËå ¡
l¡
W
ll¡" it
-K''
r¡
I
li
fll ¡r
llii
lli'u
B_i
ErE
È¡t
8tã
t;l
eÃ!
|,¡
&1,
,Ft-',:]1
d'6-".
:'l {¡¡
@ 6il-
:ñ
;d
I
a
@
@
@@o
¡ii ¡,8
rrËÈÊ"
'åË
É
Er I
ågl
E:!
Bäå
;år
sàä
{å
iI
ì
P
,
É
7.s.,:,
iåt
âã{
sr*
z
¡
:i
9¡
zþ
í;
ri,
o
c
J
d
å;'i:Ëååå'iåuååã
9A
så
:
E
ä
È
Ê
å
3 ëê
IE
€
3;:5È
g;;€¡
ËË¡ãã
g:ã!:
EË89
:
gäs
E:EÈ
:åÞ5
ËsÉå
ç*E
ÈEË
åEË
eiË
:!e
E5È
ËC
:f
ae
ã;
lg
li
Ê
lç
lo
tñ
l:
I
:l
1t
Etl
;l
L
FOR DESIGN PURPOSES