Agenda packet — Shasta Lake City Council, May 16, 2023

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 16, 2023

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers
4488 Red Bluff Street
Shasta Lake. CA 96019
Tuesday, May 16, at 6:00 PM
Mayor: Greg Watkins
Vice Mayor: Janice Powell
Council Members: Tena Eisenbeisz, Justin Jones, Pamelyn Morgan

OTHER WAYS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING
• Watch a livestream of the meeting online or view the recording any time after the meeting concludes at the following: cityofshastalake.org/meetings
• Submit public comment by mail or email addressed to City Clerk, City of Shasta Lake, PO Box 777, Shasta Lake, CA 96019 or [email protected]. Mailed and emailed comments must be received one day prior to the meeting to be included.
6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER – REGULAR MEETING:

Call to order (please place electronic devices on silent) Statement for the record of Council Members present or absent Pledge of Allegiance
Invocation
AWARDS & RECOGNITIONS:

PRESENTATIONS:

Durriya Syed, Outreach Analyst, California Department of Insurance Presentation.

The Brown Act prohibits the Council from taking action on any item not placed on the Agenda in most cases. The Brown Act requires any non-confidential documents or writings distributed to a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours before a regular meeting to be made available to members of the public at the same time they are distributed.

Should supplemental materials to be evaluated in the decision-making process be made available to the members of the legislative body at the meeting, seven (7) copies must be provided to the City Clerk who will distribute them.

Councilmembers are encouraged to contact the City Manager prior to the meeting with questions or concerns regarding any item on the Agenda so that their questions and concerns can be adequately addressed at the meeting.

Agenda packets are available for public review at City Hall, 4477 Main Street, Shasta Lake, CA during normal business hours of 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. weekdays, excluding holidays.

In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call (530) 275-7407. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting is requested to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 16, 2023
James Takehara, Electric Utility Director – follow up on Wildland Fire Protection Agreement.

COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, AND OUTSIDE AGENCY REPORTS:

Outside Agency Funding Reports:

Shasta Lake Chamber of Commerce
Shasta County Chemical People
Shasta Damboree
CVHS Sober Grad
PUBLIC COMMENT:

This time is set aside for citizens to address the City Council on matters listed on the Consent Agenda as well as other items not included on the Regular Agenda. If your comments concern an item noted on the regular agenda, please address the Council when that item is open for public comment. Each speaker is allocated three (3) minutes to speak. Speakers may not cede their time. Comments should be limited to matters within the jurisdiction of the City. Council discussion or action cannot be taken on items not listed on the agenda other than to receive comments. Speaker forms are available from the City Clerk, 4477 Main Street, Shasta Lake, on the City’s website, or at the back of the meeting hall. If you have documents to present to members of Council, please provide a minimum of seven copies.

CONSENT AGENDA:

The items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine business and will be voted on together by one motion unless a Council Member requests a specific item to be removed and discussed separately.

1. Acceptance of the Minutes of the April 18, 2023, regular meeting. (page 5)

2. Resolution to declare J.F. Shea Construction the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, award a construction contract in the amount of $1,151,542.00 to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. for the construction of the Street Improvements 2023 Project, and approve total expenditure for construction not to exceed $1,275,000.00. (Page 8)

3. Resolution to extend the previously adopted 2016 Engineering and Traffic Survey Final Report and retain the speed limit recommendations contained therein. (Page 12) PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
REGULAR AGENDA: None

4. STAFF COMMENTS:

5. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REPORTS:

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 16, 2023

This is the time set aside for Council Members, who may so desire, to give brief comments or reports concerning City matters. The City Council may not enter into discussion on matters reported.

Statements made by individual Council Members should not be interpreted as a statement of the City Council. The City Council only takes action by majority vote. • Brief reports by members of the Council regarding correspondence, events and/or meetings attended, and upcoming meetings/events.
• Suggestions/motions for future agenda items.
• In compliance with Assembly Bill 1234, Council will report on attendance at conferences/meetings/events where expenses are reimbursed by the City.

ADJOURNMENT:

Meetings are broadcast on the Wednesday following the meeting at 6:00 PM and the following Friday at 2:00 PM on Charter Channel 181. Videos of meetings are also available through the City website: www.cityofshastalake.org 800-927-4357 insurance.ca.gov California Department of Insurance - September 2022 California progress report
on wildfires and insurance
The California Department of Insurance reports the first positive movement in several years on addressing the impact of wildfires on the state’s homeowners insurance market — despite continuing challenges ahead.

As the Sacramento Bee reported in November, “Despite the ever-increasing risk of wildfires from climate change and other factors, California has lately become a better place to do business” (“California’s wildfire insurance crisis is easing,” Nov. 9, 2021).

Key findings from our annual report on non-renewals and the FAIR Plan (released December 20, 2021) indicate:

Insurance company non-renewals decreased in 2020: The number of homeowners non-renewed by insurance companies fell by 10 percent statewide compared to the previous year — a decrease of 22,870 policies.

Mandatory moratoriums helped contribute to overall decrease in non-renewals: Areas under mandatory moratoriums as authorized by Senate Bill 824 (Lara, 2018) made up more than 80 percent of the statewide reduction in non-renewals. More than 4 million policyholders have been protected under this law over the past three years.

FAIR Plan coverage continues to grow: FAIR Plan policies increased for the second year to 241,466 – while still only representing less than 3 percent of the overall statewide residential market of

8.7 million policies today. Our data underscores the need for continued actions Commissioner Lara has taken to strengthen FAIR Plan coverage for consumers and businesses.

Commissioner Lara and Department of Insurance staff met with California Farm Bureau Federation President Jamie Johansson and residents of Paradise in summer 2021 to announce support of Senate Bill 11 (Rubio), which expanded the FAIR Plan to cover agricultural risks.
1 800-927-4357 insurance.ca.gov California Department of Insurance - September 2022 Under the direction of Insurance Commissioner Ricardo
Lara, the Department of Insurance has undertaken the
following comprehensive actions to secure a competitive market and protect consumers:

Increasing availability of insurance: Farmers,
Allstate, and CSAA – #2, 3, and 4 in the state for
market share – among other insurance companies have
committed to the Department of Insurance that they
will increase the number of new homeowners policies
written in the state and cease or limit non-renewals.

Engaging with communities and consumers
statewide: Since 2019, Commissioner Lara and
Department staff have participated in over 60 town
halls and community events, many in partnership with
members of the State Legislature, listening to tens of
thousands of homeowners and business owners about
the growing threat of wildfires to lives and property.

Increasing home safety incentives: At Commissioner
Lara’s urging, insurance companies have significantly
expanded premium discounts now available to 2
out of every 5 consumers, providing up to 20 percent
discounts for wildfire-hardened homes.

Making us Safer from Wildfires: Commissioner Lara
initiated a first-ever partnership with the emergency
preparedness and response agencies in Governor
Newsom’s Administration to create consistent and
achievable wildfire safety measures for homes and
communities with input from consumer groups, fire
chiefs, and researchers. Launched in January 2022.

Expanding FAIR Plan’s coverage for homeowners:

Commissioner Lara ordered the FAIR Plan – California’s
insurance safety net – to raise homeowners coverage
limits, and to offer a comprehensive homeowners’
insurance coverage option in addition to its current
limited coverage. A judge ruled the Commissioner has
the existing authority to order the FAIR Plan
to provide enhanced coverage options benefiting
consumers.

Creating additional consumer protections postwildfire: Commissioner Lara partnered with the State Legislature on laws increasing payouts and
evacuation benefits for wildfire survivors (SB 872, Dodd, 2020) and creating new disclosures and coverage to
meet upgraded building codes (AB 2756, Limón and
Bloom, 2020)
Expanding agricultural and commercial
insurance: Commissioner Lara supported and is
implementing SB 11 (Rubio, 2021) to expand the FAIR
Plan for agricultural and farm risks. He ordered the
FAIR Plan to increase its commercial coverage limits,
which have not been raised in at least 24 years. The
Department is taking additional steps to secure a
competitive commercial insurance market for family
farmers, vintners, ranchers, and other outdoor and rural businesses.

Implementing first-of-its-kind Climate Insurance
Report: Commissioner Lara convened the Climate
Insurance Working Group under SB 30 (Lara, 2018),
issuing 40 state and local policy recommendations
focused on reducing damage and improving recovery for
vulnerable communities following a wildfire, extreme heat wave, or flood.

Comprehensive insurance solutions
to protect all Californians
Wildfire safety regulations: Commissioner
Lara proposed regulations requiring insurance
companies to factor consumers’ and businesses’
wildfire safety actions into their pricing of
residential and commercial coverage. The
new regulations also provide consumers with
transparency about their “wildfire risk score”
that insurance companies assign to properties.
2 Safer from Wildres is an interagency partnership between Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara and the emergency response and readiness agencies in Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration to protect lives, homes, and businesses by reducing wildre risk.

With California experiencing devastating, climate change-intensied wildres, homes and businesses need insurance they can rely on.

Commissioner Lara is using every tool available to improve insurance for our communities. Drawing on the direct experience of rst responders and the latest research on wildres, the partnership created a consistent approach to reducing risk with a list of achievable and e ective actions
to help make existing homes and businesses safer from wildres. The ultimate goal is protecting consumers by reducing wildre risk in their communities, making insurance available and a
ordable for all Californians.

This “ground up” approach for wildre resilience has three layers of protection — for the structure, the immediate surroundings, and the community — to prevent wildres from catching and spreading to other homes and businesses in the neighborhood. • Class-A Fire rated roof
• Maintain a 5 foot ember-resistant zone around a home
(including fencing within 5 feet)
• Noncombustible 6 inches at the bottom of exterior walls • Ember and re-resistant vents (See Low-Cost Retrot List, and Chapter 7A)
• Upgraded windows (Double paned or added shutters)
• Enclosed eaves
Protecting the 1 structure Working together as a 3 community • The Partnership recognized the benet of community-wide mitigation plans where the community has a clearly
dened boundary, a local risk assessment in consultation with the local re district or state re agency, and clear funding sources to implement community mitigation
activities and meet risk reduction goals.
• Current examples include Fire Risk Reduction Communities designated by the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection and Firewise USA communities in good standing.

Commissioner Lara is working to increase available
incentives for wildre safety. To view the list of insurance companies currently o
ering discounts visit
insurance.ca.gov.

Safer from Wildres in 1 2 3
• Cleared vegetation and debris from under decks
• Removal of combustible sheds and other outbuildings
from the immediate surroundings of the home, to at least a distance of 30 feet
• Defensible space compliance (including trimming trees, removal of brush and debris from yard, and compliance
with state law and local ordinances)
Protecting the immediate 2 surroundings
3 Top Ten Tips forFinding Residential Insurance
Weareawaretherehasbeen an increase in nonrenewalsandunderstandthat residential insurance is gettingharderto find in anyareathatinsurersidentify as having a higherthanaverageriskof wildfire. While theDepartmentofInsurance doesn’thavethe legal authoritytotellinsurerswhatlevelofrisktheymustwriteorwheretheymustwriteinsurance,we can monitorthatthey are consistent in theirdecisions andthattheirdecisions arebasedonconsiderationsofrisk,not other biases. Weare here to help youand have a numberoftipstohelp youthrough this process.

If you get a nonrenewal notice, contact yourinsurer and ask if there are any specific actions youcould take to mitigateyourriskandretainyourcoverage.

If you think your nonrenewal was unfair, you may file a complaint with us.

Don’tlet these actions delay starting yoursearchfor a newinsurer.Make sureyou havedone everything youcan doat yourpropertytomitigatefireriskthenstartshoppingforcoverage.

Inaddition tocontacting local agentsorbrokersin the vicinity ofyourhome,youmaywish touse ourResidential Insurance Company Contact List that provides toll free numbers for over 50 insurers that are licensed to sell homeownersinsurance. Youcan contact each ofthemto find the closest agent or brokeror,in some cases, get a quotefromthemdirectly.

If you need help from an agentthatspeaks a specific language, you can use our Find an Agent or Brokertool to find onenearyou.

Youcan also utilize ourHomeowner PremiumComparisonTool and Homeowner Coverage ComparisonTool to compare premiums and coverages.

If your agent cannot help you find coverage with an insurer other than the FAIR Plan, you or your agent should contact other agents and brokers who represent other insurers. Our Home Insurance Finder tool can help you find other agents in your region or beyond and tells you which insurers they represent.

Understand that the California FAIR Plan is available to every homeowner as a last option for coverage. The maximum limit written by the FAIR Plan on a residential property for all coverages combined is $3,000,000.

Because the coverage provided by a FAIR Plan policy is very limited, it is recommended that you supplement the FAIR Plan policy with a Difference in Conditions policy.

If none oftheseoptionswork foryou, youmaytryobtaining coveragein the“surpluslines”market.Ask your agent orbrokerifthey are able to obtain coveragewith a surpluslinesinsurerorobtain coverage through a surpluslines broker(note,surpluslinesinsurers arenotbackedbytheCalifornia InsuranceGuaranteeAssociation).

If you prefer to speak live with our staff, you are always welcome to call the Department of Insurance toll free at 1-800-927-4357.
insurance.ca.gov 800.927.4357
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 9
10 8
4 MEETING OF THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE CITY COUNCIL

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
HELD TUESDAY, MAY 2, 2023 AT THE
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 4488 RED BLUFF ST, SHASTA LAKE, CALIFORNIA

6 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER - Regular Session
Mayor Watkins convened the regular meeting at 6:00 PM
Council Members present: Eisenbeisz, Jones, Morgan, Powell, Watkins Council Members absent: none
Pledge & invocation

AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS
Proclamation for Community Action Month, May 2023.

PRESENTATIONS:

Will Bond, City Engineer - Pine Grove Avenue & Ashby Road Intersection Modifications.

Public Comment: Katie Brisbon, Sara Humphrey and Cheryle Yednak spoke in favor of the 4-way stop.

Ann Morningstar spoke in favor of increasing sight distance. Jim Mark spoke in favor of a stop light.

Lieutenant Caleb MacGregor – 2022 Part 1 Crimes Overview Steve Ayers, Building Official – to congratulate Code Enforcement Officer Bryan Trudeau on obtaining the required Building Inspector Certifications.

James Takehara, Electric Utility Director – Legislative and Regulatory Update.

COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, AND OUTSIDE AGENCY REPORTS
Outside Agency Funding Reports:

Shasta Lake Garden Project
United Way of Shasta County

Public Comment:

Jim Mark spoke about body-cams.

CONSENT AGENDA

1. Acceptance of the Minutes of the April 18, 2023 regular meeting.

2. Acceptance of the Minutes of the April 18, 2023, special meeting.

3. Resolution CC-2023-29 accepting the Quarterly Cash and Investment Report for the period ending March 31, 2023.

4. Resolution CC-2023-30 re-appointing Tony Thomasy as a member of the Association of California Water Agencies Region 2 Board.
5 Minutes – May 2, 2023

5. Resolution CC-2023-31 authorizing the City Manager to execute the Wildland Fire Protection Agreement to provide supplemental fire protection services within the City. Pulled for discussion.

6. Resolution CC-2023-32 approving and adopting the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Payrate Schedule for regular full-time and regular part-time position titles and classifications. Pulled for discussion.

7. Information Item:

Checks, E-Payments & Wires
3/16/2023 $306,912.47
3/22/2023 $641,130.43
3/30/2023 $414,792.82
4/06/2023 $1,709,543.71
Payroll:
4/05/2023 $184,463.23
4/21/2023 $182,431.03
Motion/Vote:

By motion made/seconded (Morgan/Eisenbeisz), and carried, the consent agenda was approved.

At the request of Council, James Takehara, Electric Utility Director, spoke regarding the Wildland Fire Protection Agreement item #5.

Motion/Vote:

By motion made/seconded (Powell/Eisenbeisz), and carried as amended, Resolution CC-2023-31 was approved.

At the request of Council, Wendy Howard, Finance Director, responded to questions about item #6.

Motion/Vote:

By motion made/seconded (Morgan/Eisenbeisz), and carried, Resolution CC-2023-32 was approved.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

8. Public Hearing and possible action to approve the following:
a) Resolution approving the Engineer’s Report for Deer Creek Manor Landscaping and Lighting District and the levy and collection of assessments within such district for fiscal year 2023/2024 and confirming diagrams and assessments pursuant to the provisions of Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code and as provided by Article XII D of the California Constitution. b) Resolution approving the Engineer’s Report for Deer Creek Manor Drainage Maintenance District and the levy and collection of assessments within such district for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 and confirming diagrams and assessments pursuant to the benefit assessment act of 1982.

Motion/Vote:

By motion made/seconded (/Eisenbeisz/Powell), and carried, Resolution CC-2023-33 and CC-2023-34 were approved.

REGULAR AGENDA None

COMMUNICATIONS
Staff Comments
6 Minutes – May 2, 2023
City Council Comments

ADJOURNMENT
With no further business, Mayor Watkins adjourned the meeting at 8:25 pm.

_____________________________
TONI M. COATES, CMC, City Clerk
7 Report and Recommendations 2
Reviewed and Approved

City Manager

AGENDA ITEM
City Council
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Will Bond, City Engineer

DATE: May 16, 2023
SUBJECT: Construction Contract Award
Street Improvements 2023 – Bid No. 2023-12
FILE NO.: New
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff requests that the City Council consider awarding the Street Improvements 2023 project to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. of Redding, CA in the amount of $1,151,542.00 and approve a total of $1,275,000.00 to allow for a contract contingency.

BACKGROUND:

The Street Improvements 2023 project is being constructed to overlay various streets directly west of the UPRR tracks per the attached project exhibit.

The City advertised the project for bid on March 27, 2023 and two (2) bids were received on April 27, 2023. Both bids were deemed to be responsive. The bids ranged from a low bid of $1,151,542.00 (2% above the Engineer’s Estimate of $1,128,292.50) to a high bid of $1,174,064.00 (4% above the Engineer’s Estimate). A Bid Summary is attached.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

This project is funded through currently budgeted SB1 RMRA and Gas Tax funds.

ATTACHMENTS:

Project Exhibit, Resolution, and Bid Summary
DISTRIBUTION:

City Council
8 9
RESOLUTION CC 23-xx
________________________________________________________________________________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE CITY COUNCIL TO DECLARE J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC. THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE, RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,151,542.00 TO J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2023

PROJECT, AND APPROVE TOTAL EXPENDITURE FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT TO EXCEED $1,275,000.00
________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, The City advertised for competitive bids to construct the above project starting on March 27, 2023; and
WHEREAS, The City opened two competitive bids on April 27, 2023; and WHEREAS, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder was J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. of Redding, CA with a bid of $1,151,542.00; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the construction contract funds, contingency funds need to be allocated, creating a construction budget of $1,275,000.00.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Shasta Lake City Council hereby:

Declares J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, awards a construction contract in the amount of $1,151,542.00 to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc.for the construction of the Street Improvements 2023 project, and approves total expenditure for construction not to exceed $1,275,000.00.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

GREG WATKINS, MAYOR
ATTEST:

TONI M. COATES, CMC
City Clerk
10 Engineer's Estimate J.F. Shea Construction, Inc.

License No. 769989 License No. 295418DIR No. 1000001536 DIR No. 1000002402 Item # Description Est. Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total 1 Traffic Control 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $137,950.00 $137,950.00 $105,000.00 $105,000.002 Erosion and Sediment Control 1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.003 Pavement Grinding and Patching (0.17' Depth) 9,935 SY $20.00 $198,700.00 $19.00 $188,765.00 $21.60 $214,596.004 Transition Taper Grinding (0.0' to 0.17' Depth) 600 LF $5.00 $3,000.00 $16.00 $9,600.00 $20.00 $12,000.005 Edge Taper Grinding (0.0 to 0.17' Depth) 3,000 LF $5.00 $15,000.00 $3.15 $9,450.00 $7.00 $21,000.006 Pavement Reinforcing Fabric 40,700 SY $2.50 $101,750.00 $2.31 $94,017.00 $2.09 $85,063.007 Type 'A' Hot Mix Asphalt (0.085' Leveling Course and 0.17' Overlay) 5,150 Ton $100.00 $515,000.00 $109.00 $561,350.00 $113.00 $581,950.00 8 Shoulder Backing (2.0' Width) 27,250 LF $2.25 $61,312.50 $1.22 $33,245.00 $2.00 $54,500.009 Adjust (E) Manhole Frames and Lids to Grade 26 EA $1,000.00 $26,000.00 $1,045.00 $27,170.00 $1,000.00 $26,000.00 10 Replace and Adjust Traffic Boxes to Grade 57 EA $1,200.00 $68,400.00 $770.00 $43,890.00 $700.00 $39,900.0011 Adjust (E) Rod Hole Boxes to Grade 11 EA $1,200.00 $13,200.00 $1,161.00 $12,771.00 $675.00 $7,425.0012 Remove (E) Abandoned Valve Box 1 EA $500.00 $500.00 $4,036.00 $4,036.00 $900.00 $900.0013 Adjust (E) Water Meter / Electrical Box to Grade 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,256.00 $3,768.00 $900.00 $2,700.0014 Adjust (E) Area Drain Frame and Grate to Grade 2 EA $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.0015 Thermoplastic Pavement Stripe (4" Wide Yellow) 400 LF $2.00 $800.00 $12.00 $4,800.00 $12.00 $4,800.0016 Thermoplastic Pavement Markings (White) 662 SF $15.00 $9,930.00 $15.00 $9,930.00 $15.00 $9,930.0017 Blue Retroreflective Marker 24 EA $50.00 $1,200.00 $75.00 $1,800.00 $75.00 $1,800.00 Total: $1,128,292.50 $1,151,542.00 $1,174,064.00
Tullis, Inc.

Street Improvements 2023
Bid No. 2023-12
Bid Opening Date: April 27, 2023
11 Report and Recommendations 3
Reviewed and Approved

City Manager

AGENDA ITEM
City Council
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Shelby Millingar, Associate Civil Engineer

DATE: May 16, 2023
SUBJECT: 2016 Engineering & Traffic Survey Extension
FILE NO.: T-150-104-770
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff requests that the City Council consider extending the previously adopted 2016 Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) an additional seven (7) years and retain the speed limit recommendations contained therein.

BACKGROUND:

The 2016 E&TS (Resolution CC-16-53, adopted June 9, 2016) established speed limits on fiftytwo (52) street segments within the City of Shasta Lake. Speed zones that are justified by an ET&S allow the Shasta County Sheriff’s Office to enforce the limits using radar or laser technology (in accordance with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 40802).

The methodology for an ET&S is provided in CVC Section 627 and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CaMUTCD), and requires local authorities to consider the following data when setting speed limits:
• Prevailing speeds
• Accident records
• Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to a driver • Residential density
• Pedestrian and bicyclist safety
The CaMUTCD requires that speed limits normally be set at, or to the nearest 5-mph increment of, the 85th percentile speed, or critical speed, which is defined as the speed in which 85 percent of the traffic is at or below. In other words, this is the speed that the majority of drivers consider to be reasonable and prudent. The CaMUTCD goes on to state that speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low because they:
• Create violators of the majority of drivers
• Require constant enforcement
• Would not command the respect of the public
12 • Generally result in an increase in collision rates According to CVC 40802, the E&TS must be reevaluated every seven years if local law enforcement officers are trained in the use of radar or laser equipment. A valid E&TS may be extended to fourteen (14) years if, in addition to the radar training requirements, there are no significant changes in the roadway or traffic conditions.

Due to lack of significant changes in traffic volumes within the City and no significant changes in roadway geometry, staff has determined that a seven (7) year time extension would be appropriate, as opposed to an update. No changes are proposed to the existing speed limits within the 2016 E&TS.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with extending the adopted E&TS. Future costs associated with speed limit sign placement on streets with new or modified speed limits are included in the Public Works department budget.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution, 2016 Engineering and Traffic Survey
13 RESOLUTION CC-2023-xx
________________________________________________________________________________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE CITY COUNCIL TO EXTEND THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED 2016 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FINAL REPORT AND RETAIN THE SPEED LIMIT RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. ________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the existing 2016 Engineering and Traffic Survey that set speed limits on various city streets is expiring; and
WHEREAS, the existing 2016 Engineering and Traffic Survey was adopted on June 9, 2016 by City Council resolution CC-16-53; and
WHEREAS, the City may extend the 2016 Engineering and Traffic Survey an additional seven years (PER CVC 40802).

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Shasta Lake City Council hereby extends the adopted the 2016 Engineering and Traffic Survey and directs staff to retain the speed limit recommendations contained therein.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

GREG WATKINS, Mayor
ATTEST:

TONI M. COATES, CMC
City Clerk
14 15
Traffic Works, LLC ● 2240 St. George Lane ● Chico, CA 95926 ● 530.897.0199● www.Traffic-Works.com

FINAL REPORT
2016 Engineering & Traffic Survey
June 22, 2016
Prepared for:

City of Shasta Lake
1650 Stanton Drive
Shasta Lake, CA 96019
Prepared by:

Matthew D. Manjarrez, PE
Principal
16 Traffic Works, LLC ● 2240 St. George Lane ● Chico, CA 95926 ● 530.897.0199● www.Traffic-Works.com Table of Contents
ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEYS – AN INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY …. 3 Prima Facie Speed Limit ……………………………………………………………………….. 3 Engineering & Traffic Survey ………………………………………………………………… 3 Speed Traps …………………………………………………………………………………………. 6
ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY LOCATIONS ……………………………………………….. 7 Table 1 – Engineering & Traffic Survey Locations ………………………………….. 7 Figure 1 – Engineering & Traffic Survey Locations …………………………………. 9 LIST OF LOCAL ROADWAYS ……………………………………………………………………………. 10 Table 2 – Study Locations that are Local Roadways ………………………………. 10 ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY SUMMARY SHEETS & RECOMMENDATIONS 11 Table 3 – Recommended Speed Limits …………………………………………………. 12 17

Page 3 of 13 ends

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEYS – AN INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY Prima Facie Speed Limit
The State of California Vehicle Code (CVC) contains laws applicable to speed limits and their enforcement within the State of California. The CVC defines the prima facie speed limits for residence1 and business2 district streets to be 25 mph (CVC §22352). Most other roads have a prima facie speed limit of 65 mph with the caveat that a maximum prima facie speed limit of 55 mph is established fortwo-lane undivided highways(CVC §22349). These prima facie speed limits can be overridden, and a revised prima facie speed limit may, by ordinance or resolution, be declared by a local agency and posted at a higher or lower speed limit when justified by an Engineering & Traffic Survey (CVC §22357, CVC §22358, CVC §22358.3, CVC §22358.4, CVC §22360).

The CVC (§22357 and §22358) further defines the rationale in declaring speed limits other than the statutory prima facie speed limits. When an Engineering & Traffic Survey is conducted, a local agency may determine either: 1) “that a speed greater than 25 mph would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe … ;” or 2) “that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe … .” When this occurs, the CVC (§22357 and §22358) allows a local agency, by ordinance, to determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, or 65 mph, “whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe.” The CVC (§22358.3) also allows a local agency, by ordinance or resolution on the basis of an Engineering & Traffic Survey, to determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 mph in business or residence districts on roadways not exceeding 25 feet in width.

Engineering & Traffic Survey
The requirements for an Engineering & Traffic Survey are defined in CVC §627. Three elements are required for consideration in an Engineering & Traffic Survey: 1) prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) accident records; and 3) highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. When local authorities conduct an Engineering & Traffic Survey, residential density and pedestrian and bicycle safety may also be considered. The methods used in conducting an Engineering & Traffic Survey must be consistent with the methods determined by the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans), which are

1 CVC §515 - A “residence district” is defined when within ¼ mile there are 13 or more separate dwellings or business structures upon one side of a highway or 16 or more separate dwellings or business structures upon both sides of a highway. A residence district may be longer than ¼ mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists. CVC §240 provides the following limitations: 1) the entrance of any building included must face the highway, and the front of the building must be within 75 feet of the roadway; 2) all churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling units, clubs, and public buildings other than schools, shall be deemed business structures; 3) buildings considered must have rights of access to the highway. 2 CVC §235 – A “business district” is defined when 50% or more of a highway is fronted by buildings in use for business within 600 feet on one side of a highway, or 300 feet on both sides of a highway. See Footnote 1 for limitations provided by CVC §240.
18

Page 4 of 13 ends

contained in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), Section 2B.13. The following methods are set forth in this section of the CA MUTCD:
 When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as described in the two options below:

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.  If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then the Engineering & Traffic Survey must be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer, and it shall document, in writing, the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.5, meaning that the justification must be based primarily on conditions that are not readily apparent to the driver in addition to residential density and pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
 Other factors that may be considered in the Engineering & Traffic Survey include:

1. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance

2. The pace

3. Roadside development and environment

4. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and

5. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period.  In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.
 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th speed should be done with great care.
 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surfaces in collision histories.
 When roadside development results in conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicted in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.

This 2016 Engineering & Traffic Survey conducted by Traffic Works for the City of Shasta Lake, as documented in this report fully complies with the methodology contained in Section 2B.13 of the 19

Page 5 of 13 ends

CA MUTCD as required by CVC §627. As such, this document allows the City of Shasta Lake to modify or install speed limit signage, and have these speed limits enforced by law enforcement.

Specifically, the following methodology and parameters were used:

1. During the months of January and February 2016 radar speed surveys were conducted at each study location listed in Table 1 and shown in Figure 1. All data collection and procedures were overseen by a licensed Traffic Engineer registered in the State of California. Speed measurements were obtained using a new Phantom Radar gun calibrated for each use using the supplied tuning fork. Each data collection survey was taken while in an inconspicuously parked vehicle. Care was taken to only survey cars that were traveling in free flow conditions during non-peak hour time periods. Only lead vehicles in a group of cars were measured, or those traveling alone. We measured both directions of travel in collecting the speed data, and summarized a composite of data collected in both directions of travel.

2. Ideally the speed of 100 vehicles was recorded at each study location; however, at some study locations, it was not possible to record the speed of 100 vehicles due to low traffic volume. At such locations, as many vehicle speeds as could be collected in a two-hour period were recorded.

3. Each radar sample was recorded in the field and later transferred to computer software for analysis. Based on this data, we determined the following regarding prevailing vehicle speeds at each study location.
a. The 85th Percentile Speed (Critical Speed). This is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the observed vehicles were traveling.
b. The Average Speed. This is the mean speed of the sample, or the total of all the vehicle speeds divided by the number of vehicles in the sample. c. The 10 mph Pace Speed. This is the 10 mile per hour range that contains the greatest number of observed vehicle speeds. Also provided is the percentage of vehicles traveling at or below the lower limit of the pace, the percentage of vehicles traveling within the pace, and the percentage of vehicles traveling above the upper limit of the pace. The number of vehicles within the pace is an indication of the uniformity of vehicular speeds for vehicles traveling on the given roadway.

4. Traffic Works staff visited each study location, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions that are not readily apparent to the driver were identified and recorded.

5. Accident records were obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). The data was reviewed for collisions within the City of Shasta Lake to identify accidents that occurred on each study location.

6. Additional data collected for each study location included:
a. Existing posted speed limit, if any
b. Weather condition
20

Page 6 of 13 ends

c. Time and date
d. HD photo in both directions of roadway surveyed (includes GPS data) e. Number of travel lanes
f. Direction of travel for surveyed vehicles
g. Classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Maps that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation (http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/crs_maps/).

The City of Shasta Lake is found on Maps 5D21, 5D22, 5D31, and 5D32. h. Type of area: Residence or Business District.

Speed Traps
The preparation and periodic update of Engineering & Traffic Surveys are needed to set and enforce prima facie speed limits that are legally enforceable with electronic enforcement tools such as radar. When justified by an Engineering & Traffic Survey, a local agency may, by ordinance or resolution, declare and enforce the prima facie speed limit. However, there are limitations to such enforcement.

CVC §40801 prohibits the use of a “speed trap” in the enforcement of speed limits. CVC §40802 defines “speed trap” as the enforcement, through the use of any electronic device such as radar, of any prima facie speed limit that is not justified by an Engineering & Traffic Survey prepared within five years prior to the speed violation. Two extensions to the five year period are permitted by CVC §40802: 1) to seven years when the citing officer has completed applicable training courses and the electronic device meets operational standards and has been calibrated within three years prior; and 2) to ten years when the above conditions are satisfied and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume.

According to CVC §40802, the requirement for an Engineering & Traffic Survey within the five, seven, or ten-year time period does not apply to school zones or roads that are functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Maps that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation (http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/crs_maps/). As such, there is no requirement to periodically update the Engineering & Traffic Survey for local roadways to enable the continued use of radar or other electronic means of enforcement. Further, no Engineering & Traffic Survey is required for school zones or local roadways within a residence or business district that have a statutory prima facie speed limit of 25 mph; the 25 mph speed limit on such roads may be posted and enforced through the use of radar or other electronic means without the preparation of an Engineering & Traffic Survey.
21

Page 7 of 13 ends

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY LOCATIONS
Fifty-two (52) locations were selected by the City of Shasta Lake for inclusion in this Engineering & Traffic Survey. Each study location was evaluated using the methodology and parameters described above, and a speed limit was recommend based on the results of the evaluation. The 52 locations are listed in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1.

Table 1 – Engineering & Traffic Survey Locations
NO. SURVEY STREET SEGMENT START SEGMENT END LENGTH
1 Akrich Street Virginia Avenue 100' w/o Akrich Park Ave 1300 2 Akrich Street 100' w/o Akrich Park Redding City limit 900 3 Ashby Road South End Pine Grove Avenue 3500
4 Ashby Road Pine Grove Avenue Arlene Court 2350
5 Ashby Road Arlene Court Woodley Avenue 2600
6 Ashby Road Woodley Avenue El Cajon Avenue 1200
7 Ashby Road El Cajon Avenue Shasta Dam Boulevard 1800
8 Autumn Harvest Drive Stafford Drive Sioux Drive 1750
9 Autumn Harvest Drive Sioux Drive Cascade Boulevard 1160 10 Avington Way South End Stafford Drive North 2035
11 Avington Way Stafford Drive North Chaucer Way 2100
12 Black Canyon Road Pensacola Street Walker Lane 1970
13 Cabello Vallecito Street Shasta Dam Boulevard 2132
14 Cascade Boulevard the South City Limit Pine Grove Avenue 3000 15 Cascade Boulevard Pine Grove Avenue Grand Coulee Boulevard 3400 16 Cascade Boulevard Grand Coulee Boulevard Shasta Dam Boulevard 3000 17 Coeur D Alene Avenue Ashby Road Pine Grove Avenue 3520 18 Deer Creek West End Ivy Avenue 1960
19 El Cajon West End Ashby Road 2207
20 Flanagan Road West City Limits North Beltline Road 1196 21 Flanagan Road North Beltline Road Lake Boulevard 1900 22 Grand Coulee Blvd Cascade Boulevard Shasta Street 1175 23 Grand Coulee Blvd Shasta Street Shasta Dam Boulevard 1826 24 Hill Boulevard Lake Boulevard Spruce Avenue 1520
25 Hill Boulevard Spruce Avenue Toyon Avenue 1800
26 Kokanee Ranchera Road Ranchera Road 1749
27 Lake Boulevard the South City Limit Hill Street 2100 22

Page 8 of 13 ends

TABLE 1, CONTINUED…
NO. SURVEY STREET SEGMENT START SEGMENT END LENGTH
28 Lake Boulevard Hill Street Toyon Avenue 3100
29 Lake Boulevard Toyon Avenue Shasta Dam Boulevard 1175 30 Lake Boulevard Shasta Dam Boulevard the North City Limit 5280 31 Montana Avenue Vallecito Street Allred Street 1653
32 Mussel Shoals Red Bluff Street Koch Street 2643
33 North Boulevard Shasta Dam Boulevard Pensacola Street 1441 34 Pine Grove Avenue the West City Limit Ashby Road 1700 35 Pine Grove Avenue Ashby Road Coeur D’Alene Avenue 3300 36 Pine Grove Avenue Coeur D’Alene Avenue Smith Avenue 3300 37 Pine Grove Avenue Smith Road Twin View Boulevard 1350 38 Ranchera Hill Boulevard Moccasin Lane 2500
39 Risstay Way West End Smith Avenue 2195
40 Shasta North Grand Avenue North End 1767
41 Shasta Park Shasta Dam Boulevard White Way 1500
42 Shasta Park White Way Pickard Street 1762
43 Shasta South Grand Coulee Boulevard Shasta Dam Boulevard 2074 44 Sioux Drive Autumn Harvest Drive Trinity Street 1484 45 Smith Avenue Trinity Street Risstay Way 1997
46 Trinity Street West End Buckingham Drive 1500
47 Trinity Street Buckingham Drive Smith Avenue 1700
48 Trinity Street Smith Avenue Cascade Boulevard 888
49 Twin View Boulevard the South City Limit Poppy Lane 2000 50 Twin View Boulevard Poppy Lane Shasta Dam Boulevard 1020 51 Virginia Avenue South End Twin View Boulevard 1462
52 Wadsworth Drive Autumn Harvest Drive Trinity Street 2021 Source: City of Shasta Lake and Traffic Works LLC
23

Page 9 of 13 ends

Figure 1 – Engineering & Traffic Survey Locations (blue lines)

Page 10 of 13 ends

LIST OF LOCAL ROADWAYS
The study locations listed in Table 2 are classified as local roadways on the California Road System Maps. As such, the City of Shasta Lake may use this Engineering & Traffic Survey at these locations beyond the typical five, seven, or ten-year period without update at these locations. Further, several of these study locations satisfy the criteria as a residence or business district, which would allow the City to post and enforce a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph without an Engineering & Traffic Survey; however, the City has chosen to include these roadways at their discretion.

Table 2 – Study Locations that are Local Roadways
NO. SURVEY STREET SEGMENT START SEGMENT END BUS OR RES
1 Akrich Street Virginia Avenue 100' w/o Akrich Park Ave RES 2 Akrich Street 100' w/o Akrich Park Redding City limit - 8 Autumn Harvest Drive Stafford Drive Sioux Drive RES
9 Autumn Harvest Drive Sioux Drive Cascade Boulevard RES 10 Avington Way South End Stafford Drive North RES
11 Avington Way Stafford Drive North Chaucer Way RES
12 Black Canyon Road Pensacola Street Walker Lane -
13 Cabello Vallecito Street Shasta Dam Boulevard RES
17 Coeur D Alene Avenue Ashby Road Pine Grove Avenue RES 18 Deer Creek West End Ivy Avenue -
19 El Cajon West End Ashby Road RES
20 Flanagan Road West City Limits North Beltline Road - 21 Flanagan Road North Beltline Road Lake Boulevard -
24 Hill Boulevard Lake Boulevard Spruce Avenue -
25 Hill Boulevard Spruce Avenue Toyon Avenue RES
26 Kokanee Ranchera Road Ranchera Road -
31 Montana Avenue Vallecito Street Allred Street RES
33 North Boulevard Shasta Dam Blvd. Pensacola Street RES 38 Ranchera Hill Boulevard Moccasin Lane RES
39 Risstay Way West End Smith Avenue RES (Future)
40 Shasta North Grand Avenue North End RES
41 Shasta Park Shasta Dam Blvd. White Way RES
42 Shasta Park White Way Pickard Street RES
43 Shasta South Grand Coulee Blvd. Shasta Dam Boulevard RES 44 Sioux Drive Autumn Harvest Dr. Trinity Street RES
25

Page 11 of 13 ends

TABLE 2, CONTINUED…
NO. SURVEY STREET SEGMENT START SEGMENT END BUS OR RES
45 Smith Avenue Trinity Street Risstay Way RES
46 Trinity Street West End Buckingham Drive RES
47 Trinity Street Buckingham Drive Smith Avenue RES
48 Trinity Street Smith Avenue Cascade Boulevard -
51 Virginia Avenue South End Twin View Boulevard RES
52 Wadsworth Drive Autumn Harvest Dr. Trinity Street RES Source: Traffic Works LLC

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY SUMMARY SHEETS & RECOMMENDATIONS The following pages contain a Summary Sheet for each study location that documents the Engineering & Traffic Survey results and recommendations. The summary sheets satisfy the requirements of CVC §627 that the Engineering & Traffic Survey include prevailing speeds, accidents records, and highway/traffic/roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Summary Sheets. The results of the Engineering & Traffic Survey for each location is summarized in one sheet containing Date, Weather, Time, Existing Posted Speed Limit, Roadway Direction, Number of Lanes, Determination of Residence or Business District, and Identification Local Road Classification. In addition, each sheet contains HD photographs for each direction of the road segment, a chart of radar speed samples plotted for each direction of travel, and a statistical calculation of 85th percentile speed, average speed, and 10 MPH pace speed range. Further, a description of conditions not readily apparent and collision history is provided. Lastly, a recommendation is provided for the posted speed limit along with a discussion of deciding factors and considerations in determining the recommended speed limit.

Recommendations. Table 3 summarizes the speed limit recommendations for each of the 52 locations included in this Engineering & Traffic Survey. It is recommended that the City of Shasta Lake adopt the recommended speed limits shown in Table 3 by ordinance or resolution as required in the CVC. In addition, the City should post all speed limit signs according to the standards and guidelines found in the CA MUTCD. It important to note that according to the sections of the California Vehicle Code referenced in this report, that any speed zone ordinance adopted by Shasta Lake will only become effective after “appropriate signs giving notice therefore are erected upon the street.”
Once signs are installed, the City staff should verify that the installations are appropriate, and have general acceptance by the motoring public. This is especially true for new speed zone installations, and where a revised speed limit was recommended. These locations would have a colored background cell in Table 3.
26 STUDY SEGMENT and LENGTH
POSTED
SPEED

AVERAGE
SPEED

CRITICAL
SPEED

RECOMMENDED

SPEED MPH
#1 -- Akrich Street from Virginia Avenue to 100' w/o Akrich Park Ave. Length=1300 ft. Not Posted 31 36 27 to 36 25#2 -- Akrich Street from 100' w/o Akrich Park to Redding City limit. Length=900 ft. 35 mph 34 38 30 to 39 35#3 -- Ashby Road from South End to Pine Grove Avenue. Length=3500 ft. Not Posted 40 46 37 to 46 45#4 -- Ashby Road from Pine Grove Avenue to Arlene Court. Length=2350 ft. 50 mph 47 52 42 to 51 50#5 -- Ashby Road from Arlene Court to Woodley Avenue. Length=2600 ft. 45 mph 42 46 37 to 46 45#6 -- Ashby Road from Woodley Avenue to El Cajon Avenue. Length=1200 ft. 35 mph 37 42 32 to 41 40#7 -- Ashby Road from El Cajon Avenue to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=1800 ft. 25 mph 29 33 25 to 34 25#8 -- Autumn Harvest Drive from Stafford Drive to Sioux Drive. Length=1750 ft. Not Posted 28 31 22 to 31 25#9 -- Autumn Harvest Drive from Sioux Drive to Cascada Boulevard. Length=1160 ft. 25 mph 30 34 24 to 33 25#10 -- Avington Way from South End to Stafford Drive North. Length=2035 ft. Not Posted 19 23 14 to 23 25#11 -- Avington Way from Stafford Drive North to Chaucer Way. Length=2100 ft. Not Posted 22 28 17 to 26 25#12 -- Black Canyon Road from Pensacola Street to Walker Lane. Length=1970 ft. Not Posted 23 29 22 to 31 25#13 -- Cabello from Vallecito Street to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=2132 ft. Not Posted 28 33 23 to 32 25#14 -- Cascade Boulevard from the South City Limit to Pine Grove Avenue. Length=3000 ft. 40 mph 37 43 35 to 44 40#15 -- Cascade Boulevard from Pine Grove Avenue to Grand Coulee Boulevard. Length=3400 ft. 40 mph 41 45 35 to 44 40#16 -- Cascade Boulevard from Grand Coulee Boulevard to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=3000 ft. 40 mph 35 40 29 to 38 40#17 -- Coeur D Alene Avenue from Ashby Road to Pine Grove Avenue . Length=3520 ft. 25 mph 30 33 24 to 33 25#18 -- Deer Creek from West End to Ivy Avenue . Length=1960 ft. Not Posted 20 24 16 to 25 25#19 -- El Cajon from West End to Ashby Road . Length=2207 ft. 25 mph 28 31 23 to 32 25#20 -- Flanagan Road from West City Limits to North Beltline Road. Length=1196 ft. Not Posted 28 33 24 to 33 30#21 -- Flanagan Road from North Beltline Road to Lake Boulevard. Length=1900 ft. 25 mph 31 36 27 to 36 35#22 -- Grand Coulee Blvd from Cascade Boulevard to Shasta Street. Length=1175 ft. 40 mph 35 40 30 to 39 40#23 -- Grand Coulee Blvd from Shasta Street to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=1826 ft. 40 mph 34 40 29 to 38 35#24 -- Hill Boulevard from Lake Boulevard to Spruce Avenue. Length=1520 ft. 25 mph 34 39 30 to 39 35#25 -- Hill Boulevard from Spruce Avenue to Toyon Avenue. Length=1800 ft. 25 mph 33 39 27 to 36 35LEGEND: add new increase decrease no change Continued, next page...

PACE SPEED
Table 3 - Recommended Speed Limits

Page 12 of 13 ends

27 STUDY SEGMENT and LENGTH
POSTED
SPEED

AVERAGE
SPEED

CRITICAL
SPEED

RECOMMENDED

SPEED MPH
#26 -- Kokanee from Ranchera Road to Ranchera Road. Length=1749 ft. Not Posted 22 25 16 to 25 25 #27 -- Lake Boulevard from the South City Limit to Hill Street. Length=2100 ft. 50 mph 51 58 46 to 55 50 #28 -- Lake Boulevard from Hill Street to Toyon Avenue. Length=3100 ft. 50 mph 48 54 42 to 51 50 #29 -- Lake Boulevard from Toyon Avenue to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=1175 ft. 40 mph 44 51 39 to 48 50 #30 -- Lake Boulevard from Shasta Dam Boulevard to the North City Limit. Length=5280 ft. 25 mph 36 40 31 to 40 40 #31 -- Montana Avenue from Vallecito Street to Allred Street. Length=1653 ft. Not Posted 24 28 18 to 27 25 #32 -- Mussel Shoals from Red Bluff Street to Koch Street. Length=2643 ft. Not Posted 28 34 23 to 32 25 #33 -- North Boulevard from Shasta Dam Boulevard to Pensacola Street. Length=1441 ft. Not Posted 24 28 20 to 29 25 #34 -- Pine Grove Avenue from the West City Limit to Ashby Road. Length=1700 ft. 50 mph 46 51 42 to 51 50 #35 -- Pine Grove Avenue from Ashby Road to Couer D’Alene Avenue. Length=3300 ft. 50 mph 52 56 46 to 55 50 #36 -- Pine Grove Avenue from Couer D’Alene Avenue to Smith Avenue. Length=3300 ft. 50 mph 49 53 44 to 53 50 #37 -- Pine Grove Avenue from Smith Road to Cascade Blvd. Length=1350 ft. 40 mph 43 50 37 to 46 45 #38 -- Ranchera from Hill Boulevard to Moccasin Lane. Length=2500 ft. 25 mph 22 27 18 to 27 25 #39 -- Risstay Way from West End to Smith Avenue. Length=2195 ft. Not Posted 21 N/A N/A to N/A 25 #40 -- Shasta Way North from Grand Avenue to North End. Length=1767 ft. 25 mph 23 28 19 to 28 25 #41 -- Shasta Park from Shasta Dam Boulevard to White Way. Length=1500 ft. 25 mph 19 23 14 to 23 25 #42 -- Shasta Park from White Way to Pickard Street. Length=1762 ft. Not Posted 20 26 17 to 26 25 #43 -- Shasta Street South from Grand Coulee Boulevard to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=2074 ft. 30 mph 29 36 28 to 37 25 #44 -- Sioux Drive from Autumn Harvest Drive to Trinity Street. Length=1484 ft. Not Posted 25 30 21 to 30 25 #45 -- Smith Avenue from Trinity Street to Risstay Way. Length=1997 ft. Not Posted 25 29 19 to 28 25 #46 -- Trinity Street from West End to Buckingham Drive. Length=1500 ft. Not Posted 29 33 24 to 33 25 #47 -- Trinity Street from Buckingham Drive to Smith Avenue. Length=1700 ft. 25 mph 25 29 21 to 30 25 #48 -- Trinity Street from Smith Avenue to Cascade Boulevard. Length=888 ft. 25 mph 28 33 24 to 33 30 #49 -- Twin View Boulevard from the South City Limit to Poppy Lane. Length=2000 ft. 35/40 mph 41 46 37 to 46 45 #50 -- Twin View Boulevard from Poppy Lane to Pine Grove Ave. Length=1020 ft. 35 mph 37 43 34 to 43 40 #51 -- Virginia Avenue from South End to Twin View Boulevard. Length=1462 ft. Not Posted 23 28 16 to 25 25 #52 -- Wadsworth Drive from Autumn Harvest Drive to Trinity Street. Length=2021 ft. Not Posted 24 28 20 to 29 25 LEGEND: add new increase decrease no change

PACE SPEED
Table 3, Continued - Recommended Speed Limits

Page 13 of 13 ends

28 LOCATION: #1 -- Akrich Street from Virginia Avenue to 100' w/o Akrich Park Ave. Length=1300 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 36
Avg. Speed: 31
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 27 to 36
Percent: 18% 87%
% IN Pace: 69%
% BELOW Pace: 18%
% ABOVE Pace: 13%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
50 0 0 0 0% 85 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 85 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 85 100% 0
47 0 0 0 0% 85 100% 0
46 1 0 1 1% 85 100% 46
45 0 0 0 0% 84 99% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 84 99% 0
43 1 0 1 1% 84 99% 43
42 1 0 1 1% 83 98% 42
41 1 0 1 1% 82 96% 41
40 1 1 2 2% 81 95% 80
39 0 3 3 4% 79 93% 117
38 1 0 1 1% 76 89% 38
37 1 0 1 1% 75 88% 37
36 3 0 3 4% 74 87% 108
35 1 4 5 6% 71 84% 175
34 2 0 2 2% 66 78% 68
33 3 4 7 8% 64 75% 231
32 4 2 6 7% 57 67% 192
31 3 3 6 7% 51 60% 186
30 2 7 9 11% 45 53% 270
29 6 4 10 12% 36 42% 290
28 2 5 7 8% 26 31% 196
27 0 4 4 5% 19 22% 108
26 1 0 1 1% 15 18% 26
25 1 1 2 2% 14 16% 50
24 2 2 4 5% 12 14% 96
23 1 1 2 2% 8 9% 46
22 0 1 1 1% 6 7% 22
21 1 0 1 1% 5 6% 21
20 0 2 2 2% 4 5% 40
19 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
18 0 1 1 1% 2 2% 18
17 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 17
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
85 100% 85 100% 2604
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Residential driveways that are partially obscured by vegetation or other obstructions. In addition, a daycare center is located within this segment, which generates pedestrian activity including young children in the area.

Collision History: None
Comments: This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may choose to post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).
40 45
12:00 PM

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
Frequency Cumulative
February 4, 2016 10:00 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
29 LOCATION: #2 -- Akrich Street from 100' w/o Akrich Park to Redding City limit. Length=900 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Light Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 35 mph
85th Percentile: 38
Avg. Speed: 34
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 30 to 39
Percent: 12% 90%
% IN Pace: 78%
% BELOW Pace: 12%
% ABOVE Pace: 10%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
47 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
46 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
45 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
42 1 0 1 2% 50 100% 42
41 2 0 2 4% 49 98% 82
40 2 0 2 4% 47 94% 80
39 1 1 2 4% 45 90% 78
38 1 1 2 4% 43 86% 76
37 2 1 3 6% 41 82% 111
36 2 0 2 4% 38 76% 72
35 4 2 6 12% 36 72% 210
34 2 6 8 16% 30 60% 272
33 3 0 3 6% 22 44% 99
32 1 5 6 12% 19 38% 192
31 2 0 2 4% 13 26% 62
30 4 1 5 10% 11 22% 150
29 0 0 0 0% 6 12% 0
28 1 2 3 6% 6 12% 84
27 2 0 2 4% 3 6% 54
26 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
25 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
24 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
23 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
22 1 0 1 2% 1 2% 22
21 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
50 100% 50 100% 1686
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed; no further reduction is permitted nor used.

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
31 19
January 5, 2016 2:20 PM 4:03 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
30 LOCATION: #3 -- Ashby Road from South End to Pine Grove Avenue. Length=3500 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Light Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 45 mph
85th Percentile: 46
Avg. Speed: 40
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 37 to 46
Percent: 32% 88%
% IN Pace: 56%
% BELOW Pace: 32%
% ABOVE Pace: 12%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 57 100% 0
54 1 0 1 2% 57 100% 54
53 0 0 0 0% 56 98% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 56 98% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 56 98% 0
50 1 0 1 2% 56 98% 50
49 1 0 1 2% 55 96% 49
48 1 0 1 2% 54 95% 48
47 3 0 3 5% 53 93% 141
46 4 0 4 7% 50 88% 184
45 4 0 4 7% 46 81% 180
44 3 0 3 5% 42 74% 132
43 1 1 2 4% 39 68% 86
42 0 1 1 2% 37 65% 42
41 5 0 5 9% 36 63% 205
40 3 0 3 5% 31 54% 120
39 3 0 3 5% 28 49% 117
38 2 1 3 5% 25 44% 114
37 4 0 4 7% 22 39% 148
36 1 0 1 2% 18 32% 36
35 4 2 6 11% 17 30% 210
34 3 0 3 5% 11 19% 102
33 2 0 2 4% 8 14% 66
32 0 0 0 0% 6 11% 0
31 1 0 1 2% 6 11% 31
30 2 0 2 4% 5 9% 60
29 1 0 1 2% 3 5% 29
28 1 0 1 2% 2 4% 28
27 1 0 1 2% 1 2% 27
26 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
25 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
24 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
23 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
21 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
57 100% 57 100% 2259
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
52 5
January 6, 2016 4:24 PM 6:04 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
31 LOCATION: #4 -- Ashby Road from Pine Grove Avenue to Arlene Court. Length=2350 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 50 mph
85th Percentile: 52
Avg. Speed: 47
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 42 to 51
Percent: 13% 79%
% IN Pace: 66%
% BELOW Pace: 13%
% ABOVE Pace: 21%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
65 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
64 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
63 0 1 1 1% 101 100% 63
62 0 0 0 0% 100 99% 0
61 0 0 0 0% 100 99% 0
60 1 0 1 1% 100 99% 60
59 1 1 2 2% 99 98% 118
58 0 1 1 1% 97 96% 58
57 0 0 0 0% 96 95% 0
56 0 3 3 3% 96 95% 168
55 1 2 3 3% 93 92% 165
54 1 1 2 2% 90 89% 108
53 0 2 2 2% 88 87% 106
52 0 6 6 6% 86 85% 312
51 1 4 5 5% 80 79% 255
50 8 4 12 12% 75 74% 600
49 1 4 5 5% 63 62% 245
48 1 4 5 5% 58 57% 240
47 3 2 5 5% 53 52% 235
46 5 3 8 8% 48 48% 368
45 4 1 5 5% 40 40% 225
44 7 4 11 11% 35 35% 484
43 3 2 5 5% 24 24% 215
42 4 2 6 6% 19 19% 252
41 2 1 3 3% 13 13% 123
40 3 0 3 3% 10 10% 120
39 0 1 1 1% 7 7% 39
38 1 1 2 2% 6 6% 76
37 1 0 1 1% 4 4% 37
36 0 1 1 1% 3 3% 36
35 1 0 1 1% 2 2% 35
34 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
33 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 33
32 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
31 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
101 100% 101 100% 4776
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
50 51
January 7, 2016 8:45 AM 9:52 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
32 LOCATION: #5 -- Ashby Road from Arlene Court to Woodley Avenue. Length=2600 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 45 mph
85th Percentile: 46
Avg. Speed: 42
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 37 to 46
Percent: 14% 86%
% IN Pace: 72%
% BELOW Pace: 14%
% ABOVE Pace: 14%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
52 1 0 1 1% 101 100% 52
51 0 1 1 1% 100 99% 51
50 1 3 4 4% 99 98% 200
49 2 2 4 4% 95 94% 196
48 1 2 3 3% 91 90% 144
47 0 1 1 1% 88 87% 47
46 2 2 4 4% 87 86% 184
45 7 5 12 12% 83 82% 540
44 3 3 6 6% 71 70% 264
43 3 2 5 5% 65 64% 215
42 2 7 9 9% 60 59% 378
41 3 4 7 7% 51 50% 287
40 7 6 13 13% 44 44% 520
39 2 5 7 7% 31 31% 273
38 1 6 7 7% 24 24% 266
37 2 1 3 3% 17 17% 111
36 2 1 3 3% 14 14% 108
35 2 3 5 5% 11 11% 175
34 2 1 3 3% 6 6% 102
33 1 0 1 1% 3 3% 33
32 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
31 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
30 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
29 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
28 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
27 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
26 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
25 0 1 1 1% 2 2% 25
24 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 24
23 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
21 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
101 100% 101 100% 4195
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
45 56
January 7, 2016 9:57 AM 10:57 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
33 LOCATION: #6 -- Ashby Road from Woodley Avenue to El Cajon Avenue. Length=1200 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 40 mph
85th Percentile: 42
Avg. Speed: 37
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 32 to 41
Percent: 9% 83%
% IN Pace: 74%
% BELOW Pace: 9%
% ABOVE Pace: 17%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
53 0 1 1 1% 101 100% 53
52 0 0 0 0% 100 99% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 100 99% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 100 99% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 100 99% 0
48 1 0 1 1% 100 99% 48
47 0 0 0 0% 99 98% 0
46 0 0 0 0% 99 98% 0
45 2 3 5 5% 99 98% 225
44 3 1 4 4% 94 93% 176
43 1 1 2 2% 90 89% 86
42 3 1 4 4% 88 87% 168
41 2 2 4 4% 84 83% 164
40 8 2 10 10% 80 79% 400
39 4 5 9 9% 70 69% 351
38 1 7 8 8% 61 60% 304
37 4 4 8 8% 53 52% 296
36 2 6 8 8% 45 45% 288
35 3 8 11 11% 37 37% 385
34 5 4 9 9% 26 26% 306
33 1 3 4 4% 17 17% 132
32 2 2 4 4% 13 13% 128
31 1 1 2 2% 9 9% 62
30 1 0 1 1% 7 7% 30
29 1 1 2 2% 6 6% 58
28 2 0 2 2% 4 4% 56
27 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
26 1 1 2 2% 2 2% 52
25 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
24 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
23 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
21 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
101 100% 101 100% 3768
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13. There is a prima facie school speed limit of 25 mph when children are present in this speed zone, which should remain. All school zone signing should be reviewed by the City for compliance with CA MUTCD Chapter 7.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
48 53
January 7, 2016 12:50 PM 1:35 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
34 LOCATION: #7 -- Ashby Road from El Cajon Avenue to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=1800 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 33
Avg. Speed: 29
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 25 to 34
Percent: 6% 92%
% IN Pace: 86%
% BELOW Pace: 6%
% ABOVE Pace: 8%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
38 0 1 1 1% 102 100% 38
37 1 1 2 2% 101 99% 74
36 0 1 1 1% 99 97% 36
35 3 1 4 4% 98 96% 140
34 2 1 3 3% 94 92% 102
33 2 3 5 5% 91 89% 165
32 4 2 6 6% 86 84% 192
31 3 3 6 6% 80 78% 186
30 7 # 17 17% 74 73% 510
29 5 5 10 10% 57 56% 290
28 4 6 10 10% 47 46% 280
27 5 5 10 10% 37 36% 270
26 5 2 7 7% 27 26% 182
25 8 6 14 14% 20 20% 350
24 2 0 2 2% 6 6% 48
23 1 0 1 1% 4 4% 23
22 1 1 2 2% 3 3% 44
21 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
20 0 1 1 1% 1 1% 20
19 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
18 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
17 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
102 100% 102 100% 2950
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: School pedestrian crossings at various locations. Driveways obscured by parked vehicles. Pedestrians entering and exiting on-street parked vehicles.

Collision History: None
Comments: This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). In addition, school pedestrians regularly cross this roadway. In light of these issues, along with conditions not readily apparent, a speed limit of 25 mph is recommended. It is acknowledged that the resulting speed limit will be more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed, and this recommendation is made with great care in accordance with CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
53 49
January 7, 2016 4:22 PM 5:04 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
35 LOCATION: #8 -- Autumn Harvest Drive from Stafford Drive to Sioux Drive. Length=1750 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 31
Avg. Speed: 28
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 22 to 31
Percent: 1% 92%
% IN Pace: 91%
% BELOW Pace: 1%
% ABOVE Pace: 8%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
47 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
46 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
45 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 78 100% 0
40 0 1 1 1% 78 100% 40
39 0 0 0 0% 77 99% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 77 99% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 77 99% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 77 99% 0
35 0 1 1 1% 77 99% 35
34 0 1 1 1% 76 97% 34
33 0 2 2 3% 75 96% 66
32 1 0 1 1% 73 94% 32
31 2 7 9 12% 72 92% 279
30 3 8 11 14% 63 81% 330
29 3 # 13 17% 52 67% 377
28 1 7 8 10% 39 50% 224
27 3 5 8 10% 31 40% 216
26 4 5 9 12% 23 29% 234
25 0 5 5 6% 14 18% 125
24 0 3 3 4% 9 12% 72
23 0 3 3 4% 6 8% 69
22 1 1 2 3% 3 4% 44
21 0 1 1 1% 1 1% 21
78 100% 78 100% 2198
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may choose to post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
18 60
January 5, 2016 4:33 PM 5:35 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
36 LOCATION: #9 -- Autumn Harvest Drive from Sioux Drive to Cascada Boulevard. Length=1160 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 34
Avg. Speed: 30
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 24 to 33
Percent: 7% 82%
% IN Pace: 75%
% BELOW Pace: 7%
% ABOVE Pace: 18%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
47 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
46 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
45 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
41 1 0 1 1% 100 100% 41
40 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
38 1 0 1 1% 99 99% 38
37 5 0 5 5% 98 98% 185
36 3 0 3 3% 93 93% 108
35 4 0 4 4% 90 90% 140
34 3 1 4 4% 86 86% 136
33 7 0 7 7% 82 82% 231
32 4 0 4 4% 75 75% 128
31 6 0 6 6% 71 71% 186
30 # 3 15 15% 65 65% 450
29 8 3 11 11% 50 50% 319
28 6 2 8 8% 39 39% 224
27 4 4 8 8% 31 31% 216
26 0 3 3 3% 23 23% 78
25 5 3 8 8% 20 20% 200
24 4 1 5 5% 12 12% 120
23 1 1 2 2% 7 7% 46
22 1 1 2 2% 5 5% 44
21 1 2 3 3% 3 3% 63
100 100% 100 100% 2953
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may choose to post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
76 24
January 6, 2016 7:30 AM 8:35 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
37 LOCATION: #10 -- Avington Way from South End to Stafford Drive North. Length=2035 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 23
Avg. Speed: 19
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 14 to 23
Percent: 0% 90%
% IN Pace: 90%
% BELOW Pace: 0%
% ABOVE Pace: 10%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
31 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
30 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
29 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
28 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
27 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
26 1 0 1 3% 30 100% 26
25 0 1 1 3% 29 97% 25
24 1 0 1 3% 28 93% 24
23 3 1 4 13% 27 90% 92
22 0 1 1 3% 23 77% 22
21 2 1 3 10% 22 73% 63
20 0 1 1 3% 19 63% 20
19 0 3 3 10% 18 60% 57
18 1 1 2 7% 15 50% 36
17 4 1 5 17% 13 43% 85
16 1 0 1 3% 8 27% 16
15 0 2 2 7% 7 23% 30
14 1 4 5 17% 5 17% 70
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
30 100% 30 100% 566
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13. Further, this roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). In addition, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may choose to post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
14 16
February 3, 2016 7:45 AM 9:45 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
38 LOCATION: #11 -- Avington Way from Stafford Drive North to Chaucer Way. Length=2100 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Clear BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 28
Avg. Speed: 22
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 17 to 26
Percent: 2% 80%
% IN Pace: 78%
% BELOW Pace: 2%
% ABOVE Pace: 20%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
31 0 1 1 2% 50 100% 31
30 1 1 2 4% 49 98% 60
29 2 0 2 4% 47 94% 58
28 1 2 3 6% 45 90% 84
27 2 0 2 4% 42 84% 54
26 0 1 1 2% 40 80% 26
25 4 1 5 10% 39 78% 125
24 2 1 3 6% 34 68% 72
23 1 2 3 6% 31 62% 69
22 1 3 4 8% 28 56% 88
21 2 5 7 14% 24 48% 147
20 4 1 5 10% 17 34% 100
19 1 0 1 2% 12 24% 19
18 5 2 7 14% 11 22% 126
17 1 2 3 6% 4 8% 51
16 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
15 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
13 0 1 1 2% 1 2% 13
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
50 100% 50 100% 1123
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. Further, this roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). In addition, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may choose to post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
27 23
February 5, 2016 8:15 AM 10:03 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
39 LOCATION: #12 -- Black Canyon Road from Pensacola Street to Walker Lane. Length=1970 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Light Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 29
Avg. Speed: 23
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 22 to 31
Percent: 25% 98%
% IN Pace: 73%
% BELOW Pace: 25%
% ABOVE Pace: 2%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 53 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 53 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 53 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 53 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 53 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 53 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 53 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 53 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 53 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 53 100% 0
35 1 0 1 2% 53 100% 35
34 0 0 0 0% 52 98% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 52 98% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 52 98% 0
31 0 1 1 2% 52 98% 31
30 1 2 3 6% 51 96% 90
29 3 0 3 6% 48 91% 87
28 1 1 2 4% 45 85% 56
27 5 0 5 9% 43 81% 135
26 2 2 4 8% 38 72% 104
25 2 1 3 6% 34 64% 75
24 2 2 4 8% 31 58% 96
23 4 3 7 13% 27 51% 161
22 6 1 7 13% 20 38% 154
21 0 0 0 0% 13 25% 0
20 1 0 1 2% 13 25% 20
19 1 0 1 2% 12 23% 19
18 0 3 3 6% 11 21% 54
17 1 4 5 9% 8 15% 85
16 0 0 0 0% 3 6% 0
15 1 1 2 4% 3 6% 30
14 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
11 0 1 1 2% 1 2% 11
53 100% 53 100% 1243
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: 1 collision during the 5-year period from 2010 through 2014; DUI Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed; no further reduction is permitted nor used.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
31 22
February 3, 2016 4:45 PM 6:45 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
40 LOCATION: #13 -- Cabello from Vallecito Street to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=2132 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 33
Avg. Speed: 28
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 23 to 32
Percent: 5% 83%
% IN Pace: 78%
% BELOW Pace: 5%
% ABOVE Pace: 17%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
50 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
47 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
46 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
45 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 59 100% 0
39 0 1 1 2% 59 100% 39
38 0 0 0 0% 58 98% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 58 98% 0
36 0 1 1 2% 58 98% 36
35 0 1 1 2% 57 97% 35
34 1 2 3 5% 56 95% 102
33 1 3 4 7% 53 90% 132
32 1 1 2 3% 49 83% 64
31 1 0 1 2% 47 80% 31
30 2 4 6 10% 46 78% 180
29 1 3 4 4 5 8% 40 68% 145
28 4 2 6 10% 35 59% 168
27 4 0 4 7% 29 49% 108
26 4 3 7 12% 25 42% 182
25 3 1 4 7% 18 31% 100
24 0 5 5 8% 14 24% 120
23 2 4 6 10% 9 15% 138
22 1 0 1 2% 3 5% 22
21 1 0 1 2% 2 3% 21
20 1 0 1 2% 1 2% 20
19 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
18 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
17 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
59 100% 59 100% 1643
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: The presence of side streets and driveways is obscured due to periodic vegetation and vertical dips and crests.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
27 32
February 4, 2016 2:05 PM 2:35 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
41 LOCATION: #14 -- Cascade Boulevard from the South City Limit to Pine Grove Avenue. Length=3000 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 40 mph
85th Percentile: 43
Avg. Speed: 37
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 35 to 44
Percent: 28% 91%
% IN Pace: 63%
% BELOW Pace: 28%
% ABOVE Pace: 9%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
53 0 1 1 1% 102 100% 53
52 0 0 0 0% 101 99% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 101 99% 0
50 0 1 1 1% 101 99% 50
49 0 0 0 0% 100 98% 0
48 0 3 3 3% 100 98% 144
47 0 0 0 0% 97 95% 0
46 1 1 2 2% 97 95% 92
45 0 2 2 2% 95 93% 90
44 2 2 4 4% 93 91% 176
43 1 6 7 7% 89 87% 301
42 3 2 5 5% 82 80% 210
41 1 3 4 4% 77 75% 164
40 5 5 10 10% 73 72% 400
39 4 4 8 8% 63 62% 312
38 4 7 11 11% 55 54% 418
37 3 3 6 6% 44 43% 222
36 4 3 7 7% 38 37% 252
35 0 2 2 2% 31 30% 70
34 3 0 3 3% 29 28% 102
33 0 3 3 3% 26 25% 99
32 0 3 3 3% 23 23% 96
31 1 3 4 4% 20 20% 124
30 2 1 3 3% 16 16% 90
29 0 3 3 3% 13 13% 87
28 2 2 4 4% 10 10% 112
27 1 2 3 3% 6 6% 81
26 0 1 1 1% 3 3% 26
25 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
24 0 2 2 2% 2 2% 48
23 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
21 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
102 100% 102 100% 3819
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Driveways are periodically obscurred by parked vehicles, signs, and vegetation.

Collision History: 5 collisions during the 5-year period from 2010 through 2014.

Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed; no further reduction is permitted nor used.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
37 65
January 6, 2016 8:39 AM 10:07 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
42 LOCATION: #15 -- Cascade Boulevard from Pine Grove Avenue to Grand Coulee Boulevard. Length=3400 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 40 mph
85th Percentile: 45
Avg. Speed: 41
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 35 to 44
Percent: 5% 84%
% IN Pace: 79%
% BELOW Pace: 5%
% ABOVE Pace: 16%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 1 1 1% 100 100% 55
54 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
52 1 0 1 1% 99 99% 52
51 0 0 0 0% 98 98% 0
50 0 1 1 1% 98 98% 50
49 0 0 0 0% 97 97% 0
48 0 3 3 3% 97 97% 144
47 2 1 3 3% 94 94% 141
46 2 2 4 4% 91 91% 184
45 1 2 3 3% 87 87% 135
44 2 2 4 4% 84 84% 176
43 8 6 14 14% 80 80% 602
42 1 1 2 2% 66 66% 84
41 4 3 7 7% 64 64% 287
40 7 7 14 14% 57 57% 560
39 3 3 6 6% 43 43% 234
38 # 2 12 12% 37 37% 456
37 5 4 9 9% 25 25% 333
36 5 2 7 7% 16 16% 252
35 2 2 4 4% 9 9% 140
34 1 1 2 2% 5 5% 68
33 1 0 1 1% 3 3% 33
32 0 2 2 2% 2 2% 64
31 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
30 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
29 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
28 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
27 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
26 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
25 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
24 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
23 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
21 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
100 100% 100 100% 4050
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Sight distance is limited through and approaching roadway curvature.

Collision History: 2 collisions during the 5-year period from 2010 through 2014.

Comments: The recommended speed limit is set 5 mph below the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
55 45
January 6, 2016 10:23 AM 11:15 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
43 LOCATION: #16 -- Cascade Boulevard from Grand Coulee Boulevard to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=3000 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 40 mph
85th Percentile: 40
Avg. Speed: 35
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 29 to 38
Percent: 9% 74%
% IN Pace: 65%
% BELOW Pace: 9%
% ABOVE Pace: 26%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 70 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 70 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 70 100% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 70 100% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 70 100% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 70 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 70 100% 0
48 1 0 1 1% 70 100% 48
47 0 1 1 1% 69 99% 47
46 0 0 0 0% 68 97% 0
45 2 0 2 3% 68 97% 90
44 0 1 1 1% 66 94% 44
43 0 3 3 4% 65 93% 129
42 0 1 1 1% 62 89% 42
41 0 1 1 1% 61 87% 41
40 3 3 6 9% 60 86% 240
39 0 2 2 3% 54 77% 78
38 1 4 5 7% 52 74% 190
37 2 4 6 9% 47 67% 222
36 2 1 3 4% 41 59% 108
35 6 2 8 11% 38 54% 280
34 2 2 4 6% 30 43% 136
33 1 4 5 7% 26 37% 165
32 0 1 1 1% 21 30% 32
31 1 4 5 7% 20 29% 155
30 3 4 7 10% 15 21% 210
29 0 2 2 3% 8 11% 58
28 1 1 2 3% 6 9% 56
27 2 1 3 4% 4 6% 81
26 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
25 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
24 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
23 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
21 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 21
70 100% 70 100% 2473
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
28 42
January 5, 2016 6:37 PM 8:17 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
44 LOCATION: #17 -- Coeur D Alene Avenue from Ashby Road to Pine Grove Avenue . Length=3520 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Clear BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 33
Avg. Speed: 30
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 24 to 33
Percent: 13% 85%
% IN Pace: 72%
% BELOW Pace: 13%
% ABOVE Pace: 15%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 1 1 1% 100 100% 45
44 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
38 1 5 6 6% 99 99% 228
37 0 3 3 3% 93 93% 111
36 0 1 1 1% 90 90% 36
35 0 3 3 3% 89 89% 105
34 0 1 1 1% 86 86% 34
33 4 7 11 11% 85 85% 363
32 1 3 4 4% 74 74% 128
31 0 8 8 8% 70 70% 248
30 4 8 12 12% 62 62% 360
29 4 6 10 10% 50 50% 290
28 4 8 12 12% 40 40% 336
27 0 3 3 3% 28 28% 81
26 1 3 4 4% 25 25% 104
25 1 3 4 4% 21 21% 100
24 1 3 4 4% 17 17% 96
23 1 4 5 5% 13 13% 115
22 3 3 6 6% 8 8% 132
21 0 1 1 1% 2 2% 21
20 0 1 1 1% 1 1% 20
19 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
18 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
17 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
100 100% 100 100% 2953
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Pedestrians and children along and in the roadway. Residential district in which the street as used as the extension of front yards.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
25 75
January 8, 2016 7:50 AM 9:43 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
45 LOCATION: #18 -- Deer Creek from West End to Ivy Avenue . Length=1960 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 24
Avg. Speed: 20
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 16 to 25
Percent: 10% 96%
% IN Pace: 86%
% BELOW Pace: 10%
% ABOVE Pace: 4%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
31 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
30 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
29 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
28 1 0 1 2% 50 100% 28
27 0 0 0 0% 49 98% 0
26 0 1 1 2% 49 98% 26
25 1 3 4 8% 48 96% 100
24 3 0 3 6% 44 88% 72
23 2 1 3 6% 41 82% 69
22 1 1 2 4% 38 76% 44
21 4 3 7 14% 36 72% 147
20 3 7 10 20% 29 58% 200
19 2 2 4 8% 19 38% 76
18 0 0 0 0% 15 30% 0
17 2 5 7 14% 15 30% 119
16 2 1 3 6% 8 16% 48
15 2 1 3 6% 5 10% 45
14 1 0 1 2% 2 4% 14
13 1 0 1 2% 1 2% 13
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
50 100% 50 100% 1001
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
25 25
February 2, 2016 12:21 PM 1:44 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
46 LOCATION: #19 -- El Cajon from West End to Ashby Road . Length=2207 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Partly Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 31
Avg. Speed: 28
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 23 to 32
Percent: 8% 88%
% IN Pace: 80%
% BELOW Pace: 8%
% ABOVE Pace: 12%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
47 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
46 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
45 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
37 1 0 1 2% 51 100% 37
36 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
35 0 1 1 2% 50 98% 35
34 1 0 1 2% 49 96% 34
33 3 0 3 6% 48 94% 99
32 0 1 1 2% 45 88% 32
31 1 3 4 8% 44 86% 124
30 2 2 4 8% 40 78% 120
29 4 3 7 14% 36 71% 203
28 2 5 7 14% 29 57% 196
27 4 0 4 8% 22 43% 108
26 1 1 2 4% 18 35% 52
25 2 3 5 10% 16 31% 125
24 3 1 4 8% 11 22% 96
23 2 1 3 6% 7 14% 69
22 0 0 0 0% 4 8% 0
21 2 2 4 8% 4 8% 84
51 100% 51 100% 1414
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may choose to post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
28 23
February 4, 2016 3:09 PM 4:03 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
47 LOCATION: #20 -- Flanagan Road from West City Limits to North Beltline Road. Length=1196 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 30 mph
85th Percentile: 33
Avg. Speed: 28
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 24 to 33
Percent: 15% 100%
% IN Pace: 85%
% BELOW Pace: 15%
% ABOVE Pace: 0%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
33 1 1 2 15% 13 100% 66
32 0 0 0 0% 11 85% 0
31 2 0 2 15% 11 85% 62
30 1 1 2 15% 9 69% 60
29 0 0 0 0% 7 54% 0
28 0 2 2 15% 7 54% 56
27 1 1 2 15% 5 38% 54
26 0 0 0 0% 3 23% 0
25 0 1 1 8% 3 23% 25
24 0 0 0 0% 2 15% 0
23 0 0 0 0% 2 15% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 2 15% 0
21 0 0 0 0% 2 15% 0
20 0 0 0 0% 2 15% 0
19 0 0 0 0% 2 15% 0
18 1 0 1 8% 2 15% 18
17 1 0 1 8% 1 8% 17
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 100% 13 100% 358
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed; no further reduction is permitted nor used.

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
7 6
January 8, 2016 10:40 AM 12:40 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
48 LOCATION: #21 -- Flanagan Road from North Beltline Road to Lake Boulevard. Length=1900 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Clear BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 35 mph
85th Percentile: 36
Avg. Speed: 31
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 27 to 36
Percent: 24% 88%
% IN Pace: 64%
% BELOW Pace: 24%
% ABOVE Pace: 12%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 34 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 34 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 34 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 34 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 34 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 34 100% 0
39 1 0 1 3% 34 100% 39
38 1 0 1 3% 33 97% 38
37 1 1 2 6% 32 94% 74
36 1 2 3 9% 30 88% 108
35 1 1 2 6% 27 79% 70
34 2 1 3 9% 25 74% 102
33 0 2 2 6% 22 65% 66
32 1 0 1 3% 20 59% 32
31 2 4 6 18% 19 56% 186
30 0 0 0 0% 13 38% 0
29 0 2 2 6% 13 38% 58
28 0 1 1 3% 11 32% 28
27 1 1 2 6% 10 29% 54
26 0 1 1 3% 8 24% 26
25 0 1 1 3% 7 21% 25
24 0 2 2 6% 6 18% 48
23 1 1 2 6% 4 12% 46
22 0 1 1 3% 2 6% 22
21 0 0 0 0% 1 3% 0
20 1 0 1 3% 1 3% 20
19 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
18 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
17 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
34 100% 34 100% 1042
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13. A small radius, tight turn is located approximately 700 feet west of Lake Blvd.; the City should install curve warning signs with a 25 mph advisory speed in both directions at the curve.

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
13 21
February 2, 2016 4:30 PM 6:20 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
49 LOCATION: #22 -- Grand Coulee Blvd from Cascade Boulevard to Shasta Street. Length=1175 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 40 mph
85th Percentile: 40
Avg. Speed: 35
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 30 to 39
Percent: 10% 83%
% IN Pace: 73%
% BELOW Pace: 10%
% ABOVE Pace: 17%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 102 100% 0
47 0 1 1 1% 102 100% 47
46 0 0 0 0% 101 99% 0
45 1 1 2 2% 101 99% 90
44 1 1 2 2% 99 97% 88
43 0 1 1 1% 97 95% 43
42 2 2 4 4% 96 94% 168
41 2 0 2 2% 92 90% 82
40 2 3 5 5% 90 88% 200
39 4 4 8 8% 85 83% 312
38 2 2 4 4% 77 75% 152
37 3 5 8 8% 73 72% 296
36 3 0 3 3% 65 64% 108
35 4 3 7 7% 62 61% 245
34 8 4 12 12% 55 54% 408
33 7 3 10 10% 43 42% 330
32 6 3 9 9% 33 32% 288
31 4 2 6 6% 24 24% 186
30 5 3 8 8% 18 18% 240
29 3 0 3 3% 10 10% 87
28 3 2 5 5% 7 7% 140
27 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
26 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
25 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
24 1 0 1 1% 2 2% 24
23 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
21 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 21
102 100% 102 100% 3555
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
62 40
January 7, 2016 11:30 AM 12:35 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
50 LOCATION: #23 -- Grand Coulee Blvd from Shasta Street to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=1826 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 35 mph
85th Percentile: 40
Avg. Speed: 34
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 29 to 38
Percent: 14% 77%
% IN Pace: 63%
% BELOW Pace: 14%
% ABOVE Pace: 23%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
48 1 0 1 1% 101 100% 48
47 0 1 1 1% 100 99% 47
46 0 0 0 0% 99 98% 0
45 0 3 3 3% 99 98% 135
44 1 1 2 2% 96 95% 88
43 0 1 1 1% 94 93% 43
42 1 3 4 4% 93 92% 168
41 0 0 0 0% 89 88% 0
40 1 3 4 4% 89 88% 160
39 1 6 7 7% 85 84% 273
38 4 1 5 5% 78 77% 190
37 3 3 6 6% 73 72% 222
36 4 3 7 7% 67 66% 252
35 2 7 9 9% 60 59% 315
34 2 3 5 5% 51 50% 170
33 3 1 4 4% 46 46% 132
32 3 3 6 6% 42 42% 192
31 3 3 6 6% 36 36% 186
30 6 2 8 8% 30 30% 240
29 6 2 8 8% 22 22% 232
28 1 0 1 1% 14 14% 28
27 3 2 5 5% 13 13% 135
26 0 1 1 1% 8 8% 26
25 0 1 1 1% 7 7% 25
24 3 0 3 3% 6 6% 72
23 1 1 2 2% 3 3% 46
22 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
21 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 21
101 100% 101 100% 3446
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Pedestrians walking on roadway due to narrow/no shoulders. Bicyclists using roadway, which is posted as a bike route. Hidden driveways.

Collision History: None
Comments: This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). In addition, pedestrians and bicyclists are regularly on the roadway. The recommended speed limit is set 5 mph below the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
50 51
February 3, 2016 2:47 PM 4:35 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
51 LOCATION: #24 -- Hill Boulevard from Lake Boulevard to Spruce Avenue. Length=1520 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 35 mph
85th Percentile: 39
Avg. Speed: 34
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 30 to 39
Percent: 18% 90%
% IN Pace: 72%
% BELOW Pace: 18%
% ABOVE Pace: 10%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
47 0 1 1 1% 100 100% 47
46 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
45 0 1 1 1% 99 99% 45
44 0 0 0 0% 98 98% 0
43 0 3 3 3% 98 98% 129
42 0 0 0 0% 95 95% 0
41 0 1 1 1% 95 95% 41
40 2 2 4 4% 94 94% 160
39 2 4 6 6% 90 90% 234
38 2 3 5 5% 84 84% 190
37 4 4 8 8% 79 79% 296
36 3 3 6 6% 71 71% 216
35 4 3 7 7% 65 65% 245
34 4 1 5 5% 58 58% 170
33 7 3 10 10% 53 53% 330
32 4 3 7 7% 43 43% 224
31 5 2 7 7% 36 36% 217
30 9 2 11 11% 29 29% 330
29 3 0 3 3% 18 18% 87
28 4 0 4 4% 15 15% 112
27 3 0 3 3% 11 11% 81
26 5 0 5 5% 8 8% 130
25 1 1 2 2% 3 3% 50
24 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 24
23 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
21 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
100 100% 100 100% 3358
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed; no further reduction is permitted nor used.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
63 37
January 8, 2016 1:50 PM 3:18 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
52 LOCATION: #25 -- Hill Boulevard from Spruce Avenue to Toyon Avenue. Length=1800 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Partly Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 35 mph
85th Percentile: 39
Avg. Speed: 33
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 27 to 36
Percent: 9% 75%
% IN Pace: 66%
% BELOW Pace: 9%
% ABOVE Pace: 25%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
50 0 0 0 0% 76 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 76 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 76 100% 0
47 0 1 1 1% 76 100% 47
46 0 0 0 0% 75 99% 0
45 0 0 0 0% 75 99% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 75 99% 0
43 0 3 3 4% 75 99% 129
42 0 0 0 0% 72 95% 0
41 1 1 2 3% 72 95% 82
40 1 2 3 4% 70 92% 120
39 2 1 3 4% 67 88% 117
38 1 3 4 5% 64 84% 152
37 2 1 3 4% 60 79% 111
36 5 6 11 14% 57 75% 396
35 1 4 5 7% 46 61% 175
34 1 3 4 5% 41 54% 136
33 1 3 4 5% 37 49% 132
32 3 3 6 8% 33 43% 192
31 4 2 6 8% 27 36% 186
30 3 1 4 5% 21 28% 120
29 1 2 3 4% 17 22% 87
28 1 2 3 4% 14 18% 84
27 3 1 4 5% 11 14% 108
26 0 0 0 0% 7 9% 0
25 0 0 0 0% 7 9% 0
24 3 1 4 5% 7 9% 96
23 0 1 1 1% 3 4% 23
22 0 0 0 0% 2 3% 0
21 0 0 0 0% 2 3% 0
20 2 0 2 3% 2 3% 40
19 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
18 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
17 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
76 100% 76 100% 2533
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Driveways obstructed by vegetation. Pedestrians periodically on the roadway due to lack of sidwalk or shoulder. Bicyclists on roadway, which is a posted bike route.

Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed; no further reduction is permitted nor used.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
35 41
February 2, 2016 11:43 AM 1:43 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
53 LOCATION: #26 -- Kokanee from Ranchera Road to Ranchera Road. Length=1749 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Partly Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 25
Avg. Speed: 22
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 16 to 25
Percent: 0% 100%
% IN Pace: 100%
% BELOW Pace: 0%
% ABOVE Pace: 0%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
31 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
30 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
29 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
28 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
27 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
26 0 0 0 0% 13 100% 0
25 3 0 3 23% 13 100% 75
24 1 1 2 15% 10 77% 48
23 0 2 2 15% 8 62% 46
22 0 1 1 8% 6 46% 22
21 1 0 1 8% 5 38% 21
20 1 0 1 8% 4 31% 20
19 0 1 1 8% 3 23% 19
18 1 0 1 8% 2 15% 18
17 1 0 1 8% 1 8% 17
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 100% 13 100% 286
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
8 5
February 5, 2016 4:45 PM 6:30 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
54 LOCATION: #27 -- Lake Boulevard from the South City Limit to Hill Street. Length=2100 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 50 mph
85th Percentile: 58
Avg. Speed: 51
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 46 to 55
Percent: 11% 80%
% IN Pace: 69%
% BELOW Pace: 11%
% ABOVE Pace: 20%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
70 0 0 0 0% 95 100% 0
69 0 0 0 0% 95 100% 0
68 0 0 0 0% 95 100% 0
67 0 0 0 0% 95 100% 0
66 0 1 1 1% 95 100% 66
65 0 0 0 0% 94 99% 0
64 0 0 0 0% 94 99% 0
63 0 1 1 1% 94 99% 63
62 2 0 2 2% 93 98% 124
61 0 2 2 2% 91 96% 122
60 2 1 3 3% 89 94% 180
59 1 3 4 4% 86 91% 236
58 2 0 2 2% 82 86% 116
57 0 2 2 2% 80 84% 114
56 1 1 2 2% 78 82% 112
55 2 4 6 6% 76 80% 330
54 1 3 4 4% 70 74% 216
53 3 2 5 5% 66 69% 265
52 4 2 6 6% 61 64% 312
51 2 8 10 11% 55 58% 510
50 5 3 8 8% 45 47% 400
49 2 7 9 9% 37 39% 441
48 3 6 9 9% 28 29% 432
47 5 1 6 6% 19 20% 282
46 1 2 3 3% 13 14% 138
45 3 0 3 3% 10 11% 135
44 1 1 2 2% 7 7% 88
43 0 1 1 1% 5 5% 43
42 1 1 2 2% 4 4% 84
41 1 0 1 1% 2 2% 41
40 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
36 0 1 1 1% 1 1% 36
95 100% 95 100% 4886
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: 1 collision during the 5-year period from 2010 through 2014.

Comments: This speed zone represents a 0.4 mile segment between two 50 mph speed zones both north and south of this segment. CA MUTCD Section 2B.13 discourages speed zones of less than 0.5 miles and short transition zones. A speed limit of 50 mph is recommended to avoid creating a short transition zone.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
42 53
January 6, 2016 11:40 AM 12:17 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
55 LOCATION: #28 -- Lake Boulevard from Hill Street to Toyon Avenue. Length=3100 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Heavy Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 50 mph
85th Percentile: 54
Avg. Speed: 48
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 42 to 51
Percent: 7% 80%
% IN Pace: 73%
% BELOW Pace: 7%
% ABOVE Pace: 20%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
65 0 0 0 0% 104 100% 0
64 0 1 1 1% 104 100% 64
63 0 0 0 0% 103 99% 0
62 1 0 1 1% 103 99% 62
61 0 1 1 1% 102 98% 61
60 0 1 1 1% 101 97% 60
59 0 1 1 1% 100 96% 59
58 0 2 2 2% 99 95% 116
57 1 1 2 2% 97 93% 114
56 0 1 1 1% 95 91% 56
55 0 1 1 1% 94 90% 55
54 2 3 5 5% 93 89% 270
53 2 1 3 3% 88 85% 159
52 2 0 2 2% 85 82% 104
51 3 3 6 6% 83 80% 306
50 3 5 8 8% 77 74% 400
49 5 2 7 7% 69 66% 343
48 6 3 9 9% 62 60% 432
47 4 8 12 12% 53 51% 564
46 2 4 6 6% 41 39% 276
45 5 5 10 10% 35 34% 450
44 3 3 6 6% 25 24% 264
43 3 6 9 9% 19 18% 387
42 2 1 3 3% 10 10% 126
41 1 2 3 3% 7 7% 123
40 0 1 1 1% 4 4% 40
39 1 0 1 1% 3 3% 39
38 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
34 1 0 1 1% 2 2% 34
33 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
31 0 1 1 1% 1 1% 31
104 100% 104 100% 4995
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed; no further reduction is permitted nor used.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
47 57
January 6, 2016 12:22 PM 1:10 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
56 LOCATION: #29 -- Lake Boulevard from Toyon Avenue to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=1175 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Heavy Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 4 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 50 mph
85th Percentile: 51
Avg. Speed: 44
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 39 to 48
Percent: 22% 75%
% IN Pace: 53%
% BELOW Pace: 22%
% ABOVE Pace: 25%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
67 0 1 1 1% 105 100% 67
62 0 2 2 2% 104 99% 124
58 0 1 1 1% 102 97% 58
57 1 1 2 2% 101 96% 114
56 0 1 1 1% 99 94% 56
55 1 0 1 1% 98 93% 55
54 0 2 2 2% 97 92% 108
53 1 3 4 4% 95 90% 212
52 0 1 1 1% 91 87% 52
51 0 3 3 3% 90 86% 153
50 3 2 5 5% 87 83% 250
49 3 0 3 3% 82 78% 147
48 1 4 5 5% 79 75% 240
47 2 4 6 6% 74 70% 282
46 2 5 7 7% 68 65% 322
45 2 3 5 5% 61 58% 225
44 1 5 6 6% 56 53% 264
43 6 1 7 7% 50 48% 301
42 1 2 3 3% 43 41% 126
41 2 3 5 5% 40 38% 205
40 3 2 5 5% 35 33% 200
39 6 1 7 7% 30 29% 273
38 0 1 1 1% 23 22% 38
37 1 3 4 4% 22 21% 148
36 1 0 1 1% 18 17% 36
35 4 0 4 4% 17 16% 140
34 4 0 4 4% 13 12% 136
33 0 1 1 1% 9 9% 33
32 1 0 1 1% 8 8% 32
31 1 0 1 1% 7 7% 31
30 0 0 0 0% 6 6% 0
28 3 0 3 3% 6 6% 84
25 1 0 1 1% 3 3% 25
24 1 0 1 1% 2 2% 24
22 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 22
105 100% 105 100% 4583
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
53 52
January 6, 2016 1:19 PM 2:44 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
57 LOCATION: #30 -- Lake Boulevard from Shasta Dam Boulevard to the North City Limit. Length=5280 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 40 mph
85th Percentile: 40
Avg. Speed: 36
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 31 to 40
Percent: 14% 88%
% IN Pace: 74%
% BELOW Pace: 14%
% ABOVE Pace: 12%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
48 0 1 1 1% 100 100% 48
47 0 1 1 1% 99 99% 47
46 0 1 1 1% 98 98% 46
45 0 0 0 0% 97 97% 0
44 0 1 1 1% 97 97% 44
43 1 1 2 2% 96 96% 86
42 1 2 3 3% 94 94% 126
41 2 1 3 3% 91 91% 123
40 5 4 9 9% 88 88% 360
39 3 3 6 6% 79 79% 234
38 3 3 6 6% 73 73% 228
37 7 4 11 11% 67 67% 407
36 4 4 8 8% 56 56% 288
35 9 6 15 15% 48 48% 525
34 2 3 5 5% 33 33% 170
33 1 4 5 5% 28 28% 165
32 3 1 4 4% 23 23% 128
31 2 3 5 5% 19 19% 155
30 1 4 5 5% 14 14% 150
29 1 1 2 2% 9 9% 58
28 0 0 0 0% 7 7% 0
27 1 1 2 2% 7 7% 54
26 1 1 2 2% 5 5% 52
25 0 1 1 1% 3 3% 25
24 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
23 0 1 1 1% 2 2% 23
22 0 1 1 1% 1 1% 22
21 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
100 100% 100 100% 3564
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13. The existing school speed zone of 25 mph when children are present should remain in place between Shasta Dam Boulevard and 500 feet north of Duval Drive.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
47 53
January 7, 2016 2:42 PM 3:53 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
58 LOCATION: #31 -- Montana Avenue from Vallecito Street to Allred Street. Length=1653 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
4 3
February 6, 2016 10:40 AM 11:40 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
59 LOCATION: #32 -- Mussel Shoals from Red Bluff Street to Koch Street. Length=2643 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 34
Avg. Speed: 28
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 23 to 32
Percent: 12% 84%
% IN Pace: 72%
% BELOW Pace: 12%
% ABOVE Pace: 16%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 1 0 1 2% 51 100% 55
51 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
47 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
46 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
45 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
43 0 1 1 2% 50 98% 43
42 0 0 0 0% 49 96% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 49 96% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 49 96% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 49 96% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 49 96% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 49 96% 0
36 1 1 2 4% 49 96% 72
35 1 2 3 6% 47 92% 105
34 1 0 1 2% 44 86% 34
33 0 0 0 0% 43 84% 0
32 1 1 2 4% 43 84% 64
31 2 0 2 4% 41 80% 62
30 1 3 4 8% 39 76% 120
29 3 1 4 8% 35 69% 116
28 1 0 1 2% 31 61% 28
27 7 2 9 18% 30 59% 243
26 2 1 3 6% 21 41% 78
25 2 3 5 10% 18 35% 125
24 0 4 4 8% 13 25% 96
23 1 2 3 6% 9 18% 69
22 0 1 1 2% 6 12% 22
21 1 0 1 2% 5 10% 21
20 1 1 2 4% 4 8% 40
19 0 1 1 2% 2 4% 19
11 1 0 1 2% 1 2% 11
51 100% 51 100% 1423
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Sight distance obstructions due to vegetation. The combination of a narrow road and sight obstructions may result in unexpected conflicts.

Collision History: None
Comments: This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). In light of conditions not readily apparent, a speed limit of 25 mph is recommended. It is acknowledged that the resulting speed limit will be more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed, and this recommendation is made with great care in accordance with CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
27 24
February 4, 2016 12:10 PM 2:10 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
60 LOCATION: #33 -- North Boulevard from Shasta Dam Boulevard to Pensacola Street. Length=1441 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Clear BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 28
Avg. Speed: 24
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 20 to 29
Percent: 11% 93%
% IN Pace: 82%
% BELOW Pace: 11%
% ABOVE Pace: 7%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 44 100% 0
32 0 1 1 2% 44 100% 32
31 0 1 1 2% 43 98% 31
30 1 0 1 2% 42 95% 30
29 3 0 3 7% 41 93% 87
28 5 0 5 11% 38 86% 140
27 2 1 3 7% 33 75% 81
26 0 2 2 5% 30 68% 52
25 2 1 3 7% 28 64% 75
24 4 1 5 11% 25 57% 120
23 3 1 4 9% 20 45% 92
22 1 2 3 7% 16 36% 66
21 2 1 3 7% 13 30% 63
20 5 0 5 11% 10 23% 100
19 1 0 1 2% 5 11% 19
18 1 1 2 5% 4 9% 36
17 0 0 0 0% 2 5% 0
16 1 0 1 2% 2 5% 16
15 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
14 1 0 1 2% 1 2% 14
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
44 100% 44 100% 1054
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
32 12
February 4, 2016 6:20 PM 8:17 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
61 LOCATION: #34 -- Pine Grove Avenue from the West City Limit to Ashby Road. Length=1700 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Mild Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 50 mph
85th Percentile: 51
Avg. Speed: 46
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 42 to 51
Percent: 19% 85%
% IN Pace: 66%
% BELOW Pace: 19%
% ABOVE Pace: 15%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
65 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
64 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
63 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
62 0 1 1 1% 100 100% 62
61 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
60 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
59 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
58 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
57 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
56 1 0 1 1% 99 99% 56
55 1 0 1 1% 98 98% 55
54 2 1 3 3% 97 97% 162
53 5 1 6 6% 94 94% 318
52 2 1 3 3% 88 88% 156
51 2 3 5 5% 85 85% 255
50 4 2 6 6% 80 80% 300
49 6 2 8 8% 74 74% 392
48 7 3 10 10% 66 66% 480
47 2 1 3 3% 56 56% 141
46 5 3 8 8% 53 53% 368
45 2 1 3 3% 45 45% 135
44 2 5 7 7% 42 42% 308
43 7 3 10 10% 35 35% 430
42 1 5 6 6% 25 25% 252
41 0 2 2 2% 19 19% 82
40 0 4 4 4% 17 17% 160
39 1 1 2 2% 13 13% 78
38 2 3 5 5% 11 11% 190
37 1 0 1 1% 6 6% 37
36 0 0 0 0% 5 5% 0
35 1 4 5 5% 5 5% 175
34 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
31 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
100 100% 100 100% 4592
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
54 46
January 6, 2016 3:00 PM 3:17 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
62 LOCATION: #35 -- Pine Grove Avenue from Ashby Road to Couer D’Alene Avenue. Length=3300 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 50 mph
85th Percentile: 56
Avg. Speed: 52
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 46 to 55
Percent: 6% 82%
% IN Pace: 76%
% BELOW Pace: 6%
% ABOVE Pace: 18%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
70 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
69 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
68 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
67 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
66 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
65 0 1 1 1% 100 100% 65
64 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
63 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
62 1 0 1 1% 99 99% 62
61 0 0 0 0% 98 98% 0
60 3 1 4 4% 98 98% 240
59 0 0 0 0% 94 94% 0
58 2 4 6 6% 94 94% 348
57 1 1 2 2% 88 88% 114
56 1 3 4 4% 86 86% 224
55 3 6 9 9% 82 82% 495
54 4 2 6 6% 73 73% 324
53 4 7 11 11% 67 67% 583
52 4 2 6 6% 56 56% 312
51 3 4 7 7% 50 50% 357
50 1 8 9 9% 43 43% 450
49 4 5 9 9% 34 34% 441
48 3 3 6 6% 25 25% 288
47 4 5 9 9% 19 19% 423
46 2 2 4 4% 10 10% 184
45 1 0 1 1% 6 6% 45
44 1 0 1 1% 5 5% 44
43 1 1 2 2% 4 4% 86
42 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
41 1 0 1 1% 2 2% 41
40 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 40
39 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
100 100% 100 100% 5166
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Sight distance constraints for drivers on side streets prompt some drivers to move forward onto Pine Grove Avenue before proceding with their turns.

Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set 5 mph below the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
45 55
January 7, 2016 2:00 PM 2:32 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
63 LOCATION: #36 -- Pine Grove Avenue from Couer D’Alene Avenue to Smith Avenue. Length=3300 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Light Showers BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 50 mph
85th Percentile: 53
Avg. Speed: 49
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 44 to 53
Percent: 7% 87%
% IN Pace: 80%
% BELOW Pace: 7%
% ABOVE Pace: 13%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
70 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
69 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
68 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
67 0 1 1 1% 100 100% 67
66 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
65 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
64 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
63 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
62 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
61 0 1 1 1% 99 99% 61
60 0 0 0 0% 98 98% 0
59 0 1 1 1% 98 98% 59
58 2 0 2 2% 97 97% 116
57 2 0 2 2% 95 95% 114
56 1 0 1 1% 93 93% 56
55 0 2 2 2% 92 92% 110
54 2 1 3 3% 90 90% 162
53 3 3 6 6% 87 87% 318
52 2 5 7 7% 81 81% 364
51 8 2 10 10% 74 74% 510
50 3 4 7 7% 64 64% 350
49 5 3 8 8% 57 57% 392
48 7 9 16 16% 49 49% 768
47 2 2 4 4% 33 33% 188
46 4 3 7 7% 29 29% 322
45 5 3 8 8% 22 22% 360
44 3 4 7 7% 14 14% 308
43 0 2 2 2% 7 7% 86
42 0 3 3 3% 5 5% 126
41 2 0 2 2% 2 2% 82
40 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
100 100% 100 100% 4919
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed; no further reduction is permitted nor used.

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
51 49
January 6, 2016 2:20 PM 4:03 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
64 LOCATION: #37 -- Pine Grove Avenue from Smith Road to Cascade Blvd. Length=1350 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 3 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 45 mph
85th Percentile: 50
Avg. Speed: 43
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 37 to 46
Percent: 7% 73%
% IN Pace: 66%
% BELOW Pace: 7%
% ABOVE Pace: 27%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
65 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
64 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
63 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
62 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
61 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
60 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
59 1 0 1 1% 100 100% 59
58 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
57 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
56 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
55 1 0 1 1% 99 99% 55
54 0 0 0 0% 98 98% 0
53 1 0 1 1% 98 98% 53
52 2 0 2 2% 97 97% 104
51 7 0 7 7% 95 95% 357
50 6 0 6 6% 88 88% 300
49 2 1 3 3% 82 82% 147
48 3 0 3 3% 79 79% 144
47 3 0 3 3% 76 76% 141
46 6 1 7 7% 73 73% 322
45 7 1 8 8% 66 66% 360
44 3 4 7 7% 58 58% 308
43 2 1 3 3% 51 51% 129
42 5 5 10 10% 48 48% 420
41 2 2 4 4% 38 38% 164
40 0 7 7 7% 34 34% 280
39 2 5 7 7% 27 27% 273
38 3 5 8 8% 20 20% 304
37 3 2 5 5% 12 12% 185
36 2 2 4 4% 7 7% 144
35 1 0 1 1% 3 3% 35
34 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
33 0 1 1 1% 2 2% 33
32 0 1 1 1% 1 1% 32
31 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
100 100% 100 100% 4349
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: 1 collision during the 5-year period from 2010 through 2014.

Comments: The 85th percentile speed is 50 mph; however, the pace speed range is 37 mph to 46 mph. A speed limit of 45 mph is recommended so that the posted speed limit is within the pace. This recommended speed limit is set within 5 mph below the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
62 38
January 8, 2016 9:48 AM 10:16 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
65 LOCATION: #38 -- Ranchera from Hill Boulevard to Moccasin Lane. Length=2500 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 27
Avg. Speed: 22
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 18 to 27
Percent: 10% 92%
% IN Pace: 82%
% BELOW Pace: 10%
% ABOVE Pace: 8%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 50 100% 0
38 1 0 1 2% 50 100% 38
37 0 0 0 0% 49 98% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 49 98% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 49 98% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 49 98% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 49 98% 0
32 0 1 1 2% 49 98% 32
31 1 0 1 2% 48 96% 31
30 0 0 0 0% 47 94% 0
29 1 0 1 2% 47 94% 29
28 0 0 0 0% 46 92% 0
27 1 3 4 8% 46 92% 108
26 0 1 1 2% 42 84% 26
25 1 0 1 2% 41 82% 25
24 0 2 2 4% 40 80% 48
23 4 2 6 12% 38 76% 138
22 1 2 3 6% 32 64% 66
21 4 2 6 12% 29 58% 126
20 6 2 8 16% 23 46% 160
19 7 2 9 18% 15 30% 171
18 0 1 1 2% 6 12% 18
17 1 0 1 2% 5 10% 17
16 1 1 2 4% 4 8% 32
15 0 0 0 0% 2 4% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 2 4% 0
13 2 0 2 4% 2 4% 26
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
50 100% 50 100% 1091
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
31 19
January 8, 2016 3:21 PM 4:35 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
66 LOCATION: #39 -- Risstay Way from West End to Smith Avenue. Length=2195 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES (Future) DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: N/A
Avg. Speed: 21
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): N/A to N/A
Percent: N/A N/A
% IN Pace: N/A
% BELOW Pace: N/A
% ABOVE Pace: N/A
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
55 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
53 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
52 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
51 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
50 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
47 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
46 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
45 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
31 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
30 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
29 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
28 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
27 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
26 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
25 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
24 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
23 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 2 100% 0
21 1 1 2 100% 2 100% 42
2 100% 2 100% 42
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: Once homes are built, this roadway will be within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may choose to post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
1 1
February 6, 2016 3:05 PM 3:35 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
67 LOCATION: #40 -- Shasta Way North from Grand Avenue to North End. Length=1767 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Partly Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 28
Avg. Speed: 23
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 19 to 28
Percent: 17% 89%
% IN Pace: 72%
% BELOW Pace: 17%
% ABOVE Pace: 11%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 18 100% 0
34 1 0 1 6% 18 100% 34
33 0 0 0 0% 17 94% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 17 94% 0
31 1 0 1 6% 17 94% 31
30 0 0 0 0% 16 89% 0
29 0 0 0 0% 16 89% 0
28 1 0 1 6% 16 89% 28
27 0 1 1 6% 15 83% 27
26 0 1 1 6% 14 78% 26
25 2 1 3 17% 13 72% 75
24 1 1 2 11% 10 56% 48
23 0 0 0 0% 8 44% 0
22 0 2 2 11% 8 44% 44
21 0 1 1 6% 6 33% 21
20 0 1 1 6% 5 28% 20
19 0 1 1 6% 4 22% 19
18 0 0 0 0% 3 17% 0
17 1 0 1 6% 3 17% 17
16 0 1 1 6% 2 11% 16
15 0 1 1 6% 1 6% 15
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
18 100% 18 100% 421
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
7 11
February 6, 2016 2:00 PM 4:03 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
68 LOCATION: #41 -- Shasta Park from Shasta Dam Boulevard to White Way. Length=1500 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Partly Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 23
Avg. Speed: 19
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 14 to 23
Percent: 7% 93%
% IN Pace: 86%
% BELOW Pace: 7%
% ABOVE Pace: 7%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
31 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
30 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
29 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
28 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
27 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
26 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
25 1 0 1 3% 30 100% 25
24 1 0 1 3% 29 97% 24
23 2 3 5 17% 28 93% 115
22 1 1 2 7% 23 77% 44
21 0 1 1 3% 21 70% 21
20 2 2 4 13% 20 67% 80
19 1 0 1 3% 16 53% 19
18 4 1 5 17% 15 50% 90
17 2 1 3 10% 10 33% 51
16 1 0 1 3% 7 23% 16
15 1 2 3 10% 6 20% 45
14 1 0 1 3% 3 10% 14
13 1 0 1 3% 2 7% 13
12 1 0 1 3% 1 3% 12
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
30 100% 30 100% 569
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: 1 collision during the 5-year period from 2010 through 2014.

Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
19 11
February 2, 2016 2:23 PM 4:23 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
69 LOCATION: #42 -- Shasta Park from White Way to Pickard Street. Length=1762 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Partly Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 26
Avg. Speed: 20
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 17 to 26
Percent: 16% 92%
% IN Pace: 76%
% BELOW Pace: 16%
% ABOVE Pace: 8%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
31 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
30 1 0 1 4% 25 100% 30
29 0 0 0 0% 24 96% 0
28 0 1 1 4% 24 96% 28
27 0 0 0 0% 23 92% 0
26 0 2 2 8% 23 92% 52
25 1 0 1 4% 21 84% 25
24 0 0 0 0% 20 80% 0
23 3 0 3 12% 20 80% 69
22 0 0 0 0% 17 68% 0
21 0 2 2 8% 17 68% 42
20 2 3 5 20% 15 60% 100
19 2 1 3 12% 10 40% 57
18 0 1 1 4% 7 28% 18
17 2 0 2 8% 6 24% 34
16 1 0 1 4% 4 16% 16
15 0 0 0 0% 3 12% 0
14 0 1 1 4% 3 12% 14
13 2 0 2 8% 2 8% 26
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
25 100% 25 100% 511
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
14 11
February 6, 2016 11:45 PM 12:45 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
70 LOCATION: #43 -- Shasta Street South from Grand Coulee Boulevard to Shasta Dam Boulevard. Length=2074 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 36
Avg. Speed: 29
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 28 to 37
Percent: 39% 88%
% IN Pace: 49%
% BELOW Pace: 39%
% ABOVE Pace: 12%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 51 100% 0
43 0 1 1 2% 51 100% 43
42 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 50 98% 0
40 0 2 2 4% 50 98% 80
39 1 0 1 2% 48 94% 39
38 1 1 2 4% 47 92% 76
37 1 0 1 2% 45 88% 37
36 2 0 2 4% 44 86% 72
35 2 0 2 4% 42 82% 70
34 2 0 2 4% 40 78% 68
33 2 0 2 4% 38 75% 66
32 2 2 4 8% 36 71% 128
31 1 2 3 6% 32 63% 93
30 2 0 2 4% 29 57% 60
29 5 0 5 10% 27 53% 145
28 1 1 2 4% 22 43% 56
27 0 0 0 0% 20 39% 0
26 1 1 2 4% 20 39% 52
25 0 2 2 4% 18 35% 50
24 0 1 1 2% 16 31% 24
23 2 0 2 4% 15 29% 46
22 0 3 3 6% 13 25% 66
21 1 3 4 8% 10 20% 84
20 0 1 1 2% 6 12% 20
19 0 1 1 2% 5 10% 19
18 0 0 0 0% 4 8% 0
17 1 1 2 4% 4 8% 34
16 0 1 1 2% 2 4% 16
15 0 1 1 2% 1 2% 15
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
51 100% 51 100% 1459
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may choose to post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
27 24
February 6, 2016 1:05 PM 1:55 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
71 LOCATION: #44 -- Sioux Drive from Autumn Harvest Drive to Trinity Street. Length=1484 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Clear BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 30
Avg. Speed: 25
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 21 to 30
Percent: 8% 92%
% IN Pace: 84%
% BELOW Pace: 8%
% ABOVE Pace: 8%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 24 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 24 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 24 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 24 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 24 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 24 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 24 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 24 100% 0
37 1 0 1 4% 24 100% 37
36 0 0 0 0% 23 96% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 23 96% 0
34 0 0 0 0% 23 96% 0
33 0 0 0 0% 23 96% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 23 96% 0
31 0 1 1 4% 23 96% 31
30 0 2 2 8% 22 92% 60
29 0 0 0 0% 20 83% 0
28 2 1 3 13% 20 83% 84
27 0 0 0 0% 17 71% 0
26 0 0 0 0% 17 71% 0
25 0 3 3 13% 17 71% 75
24 1 2 3 13% 14 58% 72
23 0 1 1 4% 11 46% 23
22 2 4 6 25% 10 42% 132
21 1 1 2 8% 4 17% 42
20 0 0 0 0% 2 8% 0
19 0 0 0 0% 2 8% 0
18 1 1 2 8% 2 8% 36
17 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
24 100% 24 100% 592
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may choose to post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
8 16
February 1, 2016 5:40 PM 7:15 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
72 LOCATION: #45 -- Smith Avenue from Trinity Street to Risstay Way. Length=1997 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Partly Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 29
Avg. Speed: 25
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 19 to 28
Percent: 11% 83%
% IN Pace: 72%
% BELOW Pace: 11%
% ABOVE Pace: 17%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 46 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 46 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 46 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 46 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 46 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 46 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 46 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 46 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 46 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 46 100% 0
35 1 0 1 2% 46 100% 35
34 0 0 0 0% 45 98% 0
33 1 0 1 2% 45 98% 33
32 0 0 0 0% 44 96% 0
31 0 1 1 2% 44 96% 31
30 1 2 3 7% 43 93% 90
29 1 1 2 4% 40 87% 58
28 3 2 5 11% 38 83% 140
27 2 0 2 4% 33 72% 54
26 4 2 6 13% 31 67% 156
25 3 2 5 11% 25 54% 125
24 6 1 7 15% 20 43% 168
23 1 0 1 2% 13 28% 23
22 1 0 1 2% 12 26% 22
21 0 0 0 0% 11 24% 0
20 3 1 4 9% 11 24% 80
19 2 0 2 4% 7 15% 38
18 0 0 0 0% 5 11% 0
17 2 0 2 4% 5 11% 34
16 2 0 2 4% 3 7% 32
15 0 0 0 0% 1 2% 0
14 1 0 1 2% 1 2% 14
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
46 100% 46 100% 1133
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
34 12
February 6, 2016 8:35 AM 10:25 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
73 LOCATION: #46 -- Trinity Street from West End to Buckingham Drive. Length=1500 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 33
Avg. Speed: 29
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 24 to 33
Percent: 12% 85%
% IN Pace: 73%
% BELOW Pace: 12%
% ABOVE Pace: 15%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 92 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 92 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 92 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 92 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 92 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 92 100% 0
39 1 0 1 1% 92 100% 39
38 0 0 0 0% 91 99% 0
37 2 1 3 3% 91 99% 111
36 0 1 1 1% 88 96% 36
35 2 6 8 9% 87 95% 280
34 0 1 1 1% 79 86% 34
33 5 3 8 9% 78 85% 264
32 2 4 6 7% 70 76% 192
31 3 2 5 5% 64 70% 155
30 4 7 11 12% 59 64% 330
29 4 3 7 8% 48 52% 203
28 4 2 6 7% 41 45% 168
27 6 1 7 8% 35 38% 189
26 5 3 8 9% 28 30% 208
25 1 5 6 7% 20 22% 150
24 2 1 3 3% 14 15% 72
23 3 0 3 3% 11 12% 69
22 0 1 1 1% 8 9% 22
21 2 0 2 2% 7 8% 42
20 1 1 2 2% 5 5% 40
19 2 0 2 2% 3 3% 38
18 0 1 1 1% 1 1% 18
17 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
92 100% 92 100% 2660
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may choose to post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
49 43
February 3, 2016 9:50 AM 11:50 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
74 LOCATION: #47 -- Trinity Street from Buckingham Drive to Smith Avenue. Length=1700 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 29
Avg. Speed: 25
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 21 to 30
Percent: 6% 90%
% IN Pace: 84%
% BELOW Pace: 6%
% ABOVE Pace: 10%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 100 100% 0
39 1 0 1 1% 100 100% 39
38 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 99 99% 0
36 1 0 1 1% 99 99% 36
35 0 1 1 1% 98 98% 35
34 1 0 1 1% 97 97% 34
33 0 0 0 0% 96 96% 0
32 2 1 3 3% 96 96% 96
31 2 1 3 3% 93 93% 93
30 0 5 5 5% 90 90% 150
29 2 0 2 2% 85 85% 58
28 4 1 5 5% 83 83% 140
27 3 9 12 12% 78 78% 324
26 4 6 10 10% 66 66% 260
25 2 9 11 11% 56 56% 275
24 4 # 14 14% 45 45% 336
23 3 # 13 13% 31 31% 299
22 3 2 5 5% 18 18% 110
21 2 5 7 7% 13 13% 147
20 1 2 3 3% 6 6% 60
19 0 2 2 2% 3 3% 38
18 0 1 1 1% 1 1% 18
17 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
100 100% 100 100% 2548
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: 1 collision during the 5-year period from 2010 through 2014 Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
35 65
January 7, 2016 5:16 PM 6:25 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
75 LOCATION: #48 -- Trinity Street from Smith Avenue to Cascade Boulevard. Length=888 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: EAST and WEST # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 30 mph
85th Percentile: 33
Avg. Speed: 28
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 24 to 33
Percent: 16% 86%
% IN Pace: 70%
% BELOW Pace: 16%
% ABOVE Pace: 14%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
38 0 2 2 2% 101 100% 76
37 0 1 1 1% 99 98% 37
36 0 5 5 5% 98 97% 180
35 1 4 5 5% 93 92% 175
34 1 0 1 1% 88 87% 34
33 5 4 9 9% 87 86% 297
32 6 1 7 7% 78 77% 224
31 4 4 8 8% 71 70% 248
30 5 3 8 8% 63 62% 240
29 6 2 8 8% 55 54% 232
28 5 1 6 6% 47 47% 168
27 3 3 6 6% 41 41% 162
26 2 1 3 3% 35 35% 78
25 5 4 9 9% 32 32% 225
24 4 3 7 7% 23 23% 168
23 1 4 5 5% 16 16% 115
22 1 1 2 2% 11 11% 44
21 0 3 3 3% 9 9% 63
20 1 0 1 1% 6 6% 20
19 2 1 3 3% 5 5% 57
18 0 0 0 0% 2 2% 0
17 0 1 1 1% 2 2% 17
16 0 1 1 1% 1 1% 16
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
101 100% 101 100% 2876
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed; no further reduction is permitted nor used.

EAST DIRECTION WEST DIRECTION
52 49
January 7, 2016 7:35 AM 8:38 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
76 LOCATION: #49 -- Twin View Boulevard from the South City Limit to Poppy Lane. Length=2000 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35/40 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? BUS DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 45 mph
85th Percentile: 46
Avg. Speed: 41
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 37 to 46
Percent: 20% 86%
% IN Pace: 66%
% BELOW Pace: 20%
% ABOVE Pace: 14%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
60 0 0 0 0% 85 100% 0
59 0 0 0 0% 85 100% 0
58 0 0 0 0% 85 100% 0
57 0 1 1 1% 85 100% 57
56 0 0 0 0% 84 99% 0
55 0 0 0 0% 84 99% 0
54 0 0 0 0% 84 99% 0
53 1 0 1 1% 84 99% 53
52 0 2 2 2% 83 98% 104
51 0 0 0 0% 81 95% 0
50 1 0 1 1% 81 95% 50
49 1 1 2 2% 80 94% 98
48 1 1 2 2% 78 92% 96
47 1 2 3 4% 76 89% 141
46 2 4 6 7% 73 86% 276
45 4 0 4 5% 67 79% 180
44 0 2 2 2% 63 74% 88
43 1 6 7 8% 61 72% 301
42 3 2 5 6% 54 64% 210
41 1 3 4 5% 49 58% 164
40 7 4 11 13% 45 53% 440
39 4 2 6 7% 34 40% 234
38 4 1 5 6% 28 33% 190
37 2 4 6 7% 23 27% 222
36 1 1 2 2% 17 20% 72
35 2 2 4 5% 15 18% 140
34 2 0 2 2% 11 13% 68
33 3 1 4 5% 9 11% 132
32 2 0 2 2% 5 6% 64
31 1 0 1 1% 3 4% 31
30 0 1 1 1% 2 2% 30
29 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 29
28 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
27 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
26 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
85 100% 85 100% 3470
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Pedestrian, parking, and vehicular access activities Collision History: 1 collision during the 5-year period from 2010 through 2014.

Comments: The recommended speed limit is set at nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC §627, CVC §22358.5, and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13. A significant portion of this location is within a business district (CVC §235). A posted prima facie speed limit of 25 mph is recommended within the business district (CVC §22352). It is acknowledged that the business district speed limit is not enforceable with electronic enforcement tools such as radar.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
45 40
February 1, 2016 3:33 PM 5:33 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
77 LOCATION: #50 -- Twin View Boulevard from Poppy Lane to Pine Grove Ave. Length=1020 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph BUS OR RES DISTRICT? No DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? No OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 40 mph
85th Percentile: 43
Avg. Speed: 37
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 34 to 43
Percent: 22% 88%
% IN Pace: 66%
% BELOW Pace: 22%
% ABOVE Pace: 12%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
50 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
49 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
48 0 0 0 0% 101 100% 0
47 1 1 2 2% 101 100% 94
46 0 2 2 2% 99 98% 92
45 2 1 3 3% 97 96% 135
44 5 0 5 5% 94 93% 220
43 6 2 8 8% 89 88% 344
42 3 5 8 8% 81 80% 336
41 3 1 4 4% 73 72% 164
40 4 4 8 8% 69 68% 320
39 1 1 2 2% 61 60% 78
38 3 5 8 8% 59 58% 304
37 2 3 5 5% 51 50% 185
36 3 5 8 8% 46 46% 288
35 6 4 10 10% 38 38% 350
34 1 5 6 6% 28 28% 204
33 1 3 4 4% 22 22% 132
32 1 2 3 3% 18 18% 96
31 5 0 5 5% 15 15% 155
30 0 3 3 3% 10 10% 90
29 1 0 1 1% 7 7% 29
28 1 1 2 2% 6 6% 56
27 0 0 0 0% 4 4% 0
26 0 2 2 2% 4 4% 52
25 1 0 1 1% 2 2% 25
24 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
23 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
22 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
21 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
20 0 0 0 0% 1 1% 0
19 1 0 1 1% 1 1% 19
18 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
17 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
101 100% 101 100% 3768
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed; no further reduction is permitted nor used.

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
51 50
February 2, 2016 9:30 AM 11:23 AM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
78 LOCATION: #51 -- Virginia Avenue from South End to Twin View Boulevard. Length=1462 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Sunny BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 28
Avg. Speed: 23
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 16 to 25
Percent: 0% 68%
% IN Pace: 68%
% BELOW Pace: 0%
% ABOVE Pace: 32%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 25 100% 0
34 1 0 1 4% 25 100% 34
33 1 0 1 4% 24 96% 33
32 0 0 0 0% 23 92% 0
31 0 1 1 4% 23 92% 31
30 0 0 0 0% 22 88% 0
29 0 0 0 0% 22 88% 0
28 0 1 1 4% 22 88% 28
27 0 1 1 4% 21 84% 27
26 1 2 3 12% 20 80% 78
25 1 0 1 4% 17 68% 25
24 3 1 4 16% 16 64% 96
23 1 1 2 8% 12 48% 46
22 0 1 1 4% 10 40% 22
21 0 2 2 8% 9 36% 42
20 1 0 1 4% 7 28% 20
19 1 0 1 4% 6 24% 19
18 1 1 2 8% 5 20% 36
17 2 0 2 8% 3 12% 34
16 1 0 1 4% 1 4% 16
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
25 100% 25 100% 587
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: 1 collision during the 5-year period from 2010 through 2014 Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
14 11
February 5, 2016 10:20 AM 12:20 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
79 LOCATION: #52 -- Wadsworth Drive from Autumn Harvest Drive to Trinity Street. Length=2021 ft.

DATE: WEATHER: Partly Cloudy BEGIN TIME: END TIME:

EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: Not Posted BUS OR RES DISTRICT? RES DIRECTION: NORTH and SOUTH # LANES: 2 LOCAL ROAD? Yes OBSERVER: Jose Montenegro Recommended: 25 mph
85th Percentile: 28
Avg. Speed: 24
10 MPH PACE SPEED CALC
Pace (mph): 20 to 29
Percent: 10% 97%
% IN Pace: 87%
% BELOW Pace: 10%
% ABOVE Pace: 3%
Speed Speed
MPH Total % Total % Total
45 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
44 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
43 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
42 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
41 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
40 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
39 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
38 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
37 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
36 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
35 0 0 0 0% 30 100% 0
34 1 0 1 3% 30 100% 34
33 0 0 0 0% 29 97% 0
32 0 0 0 0% 29 97% 0
31 0 0 0 0% 29 97% 0
30 0 0 0 0% 29 97% 0
29 0 3 3 10% 29 97% 87
28 1 0 1 3% 26 87% 28
27 2 0 2 7% 25 83% 54
26 1 1 2 7% 23 77% 52
25 3 1 4 13% 21 70% 100
24 3 2 5 17% 17 57% 120
23 1 1 2 7% 12 40% 46
22 0 1 1 3% 10 33% 22
21 1 1 2 7% 9 30% 42
20 4 0 4 13% 7 23% 80
19 1 0 1 3% 3 10% 19
18 2 0 2 7% 2 7% 36
17 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
16 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
15 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
14 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
13 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
12 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
11 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0
30 100% 30 100% 720
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: None
Collision History: None
Comments: In accordance with CVC §21400(b) and CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit is rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. This roadway is within a residence district (CVC §515). Further, this roadway is functionally classified as a local roadway on the California Road System Map. As such, the City may post this roadway with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, which would be enforceable through the use of radar or other electronic means (CVC §40802).

NORTH DIRECTION SOUTH DIRECTION
20 10
February 4, 2016 4:14 PM 6:14 PM

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Frequency Cumulative
80

Shasta Lake City CouncilMay 16, 2023

Shasta Lake City Council
May 16, 2023