CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA October 17, 2023
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers
4488 Red Bluff Street
Shasta Lake. CA 96019
Tuesday, October 17, 2023, at 6:00 PM
Mayor: Greg Watkins
Vice Mayor: Janice Powell
Council Members: Tena Eisenbeisz, Justin Jones, Pamelyn Morgan
OTHER WAYS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING
• Watch a livestream of the meeting online or view the recording any time after the meeting concludes at the following: cityofshastalake.org/meetings • Submit public comment by mail or email addressed to City Clerk, City of Shasta Lake, PO Box 777, Shasta Lake, CA 96019 or [email protected]. Mailed and emailed comments must be received one day prior to the meeting to be included. 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER – REGULAR MEETING:
Call to order (please place electronic devices on silent) Statement for the record of Council Members present or absent Pledge of Allegiance
Invocation
AWARDS & RECOGNITIONS:
Proclamation for October 2023 Global Youth Justice Month.
The Brown Act prohibits the Council from taking action on any item not placed on the Agenda in most cases. The Brown Act requires any non-confidential documents or writings distributed to a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours before a regular meeting to be made available to members of the public at the same time they are distributed.
Should supplemental materials to be evaluated in the decision-making process be made available to the members of the legislative body at the meeting, seven (7) copies must be provided to the City Clerk who will distribute them.
Councilmembers are encouraged to contact the City Manager prior to the meeting with questions or concerns regarding any item on the Agenda so that their questions and concerns can be adequately addressed at the meeting.
Agenda packets are available for public review at City Hall, 4477 Main Street, Shasta Lake, CA during normal business hours of 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. weekdays, excluding holidays.
In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call (530) 275-7407. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting is requested to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA October 17, 2023
PRESENTATIONS:
Devin Owens, Shasta Lake Fire Protection Officer – quarterly report.
Presentation by Leslie Morgan, Shasta County Assessor Recorder – Annual Report 2023-2024.
Presentation by Peter Bonkrude, District Manager of Shasta County Mosquito and Vector Control – Annual Report.
COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, AND OUTSIDE AGENCY REPORTS:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
This time is set aside for citizens to address the City Council on matters listed on the Consent Agenda as well as other items not included on the Regular Agenda. If your comments concern an item noted on the regular agenda, please address the Council when that item is open for public comment. Each speaker is allocated three (3) minutes to speak. Speakers may not cede their time. Comments should be limited to matters within the jurisdiction of the City. Council discussion or action cannot be taken on items not listed on the agenda other than to receive comments. Speaker forms are available from the City Clerk, 4477 Main Street, Shasta Lake, on the City’s website, or at the back of the meeting hall. If you have documents to present to members of Council, please provide a minimum of seven copies.
CONSENT AGENDA: None
The items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine business and will be voted on together by one motion unless a Council Member requests a specific item to be removed and discussed separately.
1. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023.
2. Resolution to accept the Street Improvements 2023 Project and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion.
3. Resolution to accept the Ranchera Rd. Water Main Replacement Project as complete and authorize the filing of a notice of completion.
PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
REGULAR AGENDA:
4. Discussion and possible action to approve a supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $510, 000.00 to award the Commercial Center Safe Routes to School Engineering and Planning Services Professional Services Contract to SDS, In. of Redding, CA in the amount of $498,810.00 with $20,190.00 to allow for a contract contingency.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA October 17, 2023
5. Discussion and possible action on a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements with the California Department of Transportation for the City of Shasta Lake’s Community Parks Revitalization Project.
STAFF COMMENTS:
City Manager Jessaca Lugo – information item on letter to the Governor regarding AB 1594.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REPORTS:
This is the time set aside for Council Members, who may so desire, to give brief comments or reports concerning City matters. The City Council may not enter into discussion on matters reported. Statements made by individual Council Members should not be interpreted as a statement of the City Council. The City Council only takes action by majority vote. • Brief reports by members of the Council regarding correspondence, events and/or meetings attended, and upcoming meetings/events.
• Suggestions/motions for future agenda items.
• In compliance with Assembly Bill 1234, Council will report on attendance at conferences/meetings/events where expenses are reimbursed by the City.
ADJOURNMENT:
Meetings are broadcast on the Wednesday following the meeting at 6:00 PM and the following Friday at 2:00 PM on Charter Channel 181. Videos of meetings are also available through the City website: www.cityofshastalake.org CITY OF SHASTA LAKE CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION FOR OCTOBER 2023
GLOBAL YOUTH JUSTICE MONTH
WHEREAS, throughout October, more than 2,000 youth court programs operating in our nation’s juvenile justice systems, schools, and community-based organizations will celebrate Global Youth Justice Month. Peer Courts are youth-led and volunteer driven diversion programs and the Shasta County Youth Peer Court has been in operation for twenty years; and WHEREAS, youth peer courts are effective crime prevention and early intervention programs in the nation; and
WHEREAS, for over forty years they have offered innovative solutions to prevent juvenile crime and educate our young people; and
WHEREAS, youth peer courts emphasize the importance of being involved in one’s community, and they provide our nation’s youth with an opportunity to learn about government and take an active role in upholding our democratic principles; and WHEREAS, youth peer courts empower youth through involvement in community solutions by developing skills in leadership, decision-making, and problem solving; youth learn the appropriate use of peer pressure, and are given opportunities to mentor and instill integrity in their peers; and gain a clearer understanding of our nation’s judicial system; and WHEREAS, youth peer court volunteers play a pivotal role in making the goal of reducing juvenile crime in this country a reality and teach our youth about accountability and the consequences of making poor choices; they also reward responsible behavior; and WHEREAS, the Shasta Lake City Council strongly supports youth court programs because they help build healthier and safer communities in which we live, raise families, and work; and it commends the youth and adult volunteers who support the Shasta County Youth Peer Court and our juvenile justice system.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Shasta Lake City Council hereby proclaims October 2023 as Global Youth Justice Month in the City of Shasta Lake, California to be celebrated in conjunction with Shasta Youth Peer Court.
Dated this 17th day of October, 2023
GREG WATKINS, Mayor
1 PREVENTION OFFICER REPORT
Over the last four months I have been continuing to focus on weed abatement and outreach efforts to mitigate fire hazards on private property that are potential fire threats throughout the City.
Also, I have been working on business inspections throughout the City as well. Weed Abatement: June-September 2023 - 33 notices have been sent out. Youth Program: Nothing to Report.
Business Inspections: June-September 2023 - 67 business inspections have been completed. 31 of these business inspections had violations that warranted corrections. Once corrected, the District will re-inspect for compliance.
Fires: The District has responded to 11 fires from June – September 2023. • 4 Vegetation Fires
• 4 Structure Fires
• 1 Vehicle Fires
• 2 Illegal Burn Piles
Respectfully Submitted,
Devin Owens
Devin M. Owens
Fire Marshal/ Prevention Officer
2 ANNUAL REPORT
2023 – 2024
OFFICE OF
SHASTA COUNTY
ASSESSOR-RECORDER
LESLIE MORGAN
SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR-RECORDER
3 What’s inside the 2023 Annual Report?
The Assessor-Recorder’s Annual Report offers a detailed statistical analysis of the Assessor’s local assessment roll which is the official list of all the assessed property within the County as of the January 1st Lien Date, and a review of the Recorder’s statistics for documents recorded and funds collected for various local agencies and the State of California.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
MESSAGE FROM THE ASSESSOR-RECORDER ................................................................................. 1 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ASSESSOR-RECORDER ....................................................................... 2 ASSESSOR-RECORDER ORGAZATIONAL CHART ...................................................................... 3 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR TAXABLE VALUES ....................................................................... 4 LOCAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CHANGE .......................................................................................................................4 BY CITY / UNINCORPORATED .................................................................................................................................5 BY SCHOOL DISTRICT ..............................................................................................................................................7 PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS..................................................................................................................................8 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT HISTORY .............................................................. 9 PROPOSITION 13 - ASSESSMENT ROLL GROWTH...................................................................................................9 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS........................................................................................................................... 10 SECTION 51 VALUE REVIEWS (PROP 8)................................................................................................................ 11 OTHER ASSESSMENTS.......................................................................................................................................... 12 ASSESSMENT TEAM............................................................................................................................................. 13 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS ....................................... 14 COST PER ASSESSMENT....................................................................................................................................... 14 ASSESSMENT APPEALS ........................................................................................................................................ 15 SHASTA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXES ........................................................................................... 16 General Revenue By Source / Percentage of Each Tax Dollar............................................................................. 16 CALIFORNIA STATE (BOE) ROLL vs LOCAL ASSESSOR’S ROLL............................................................................... 17 SHASTA COUNTY RECORDER ........................................................................................................ 18 DOCUMENTS RECORDED AND FILED................................................................................................................... 18 OTHER AGENCY FEES ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT) .................................................................................................................... 19 Building Homes & Jobs Act (SB2)..................................................................................................................... 19 District Attorney Fraud Fee ............................................................................................................................. 19 HISTORICAL DOCUMENT STATISTICS................................................................................................................... 20 VITAL RECORDS.................................................................................................................................................... 21 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT MODIFICATIONS (AB1466).......................................................................................... 21 4 SHASTA COUNTY OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR-RECORDER
LESLIE MORGAN, ASSESSOR-RECORDER 1450 Court Street, Ste 208-A Intra-County toll free: 1-800-479-8009 Redding, CA 96001-1667 County website: www.shastacounty.gov Voice - (530) 225-3600 Calif. Relay Service @711 or 800-735-2922 Fax - (530) 225-5673 June 30, 2023
MESSAGE FROM THE ASSESSOR-RECORDER
The attached report contains a detailed analysis of all taxable property values in Shasta County as of the Lien Date, January 1, 2023, including exemptions granted by this office pursuant to California State Law. This report does not include the taxable value of properties assessed by the California State Board of Equalization.
A proactive approach continues to be taken to initiate Section 51 (Prop 8) reviews in order to appropriately value properties and provide an accurate tax roll. As a result, 3,407 property owners were notified that their taxable value has been enrolled at a reduced current market value. These reductions were based on a comparison of the current market value of their property as of January 1, 2023, to the factored base year value (Prop 13 value) of their property in accordance with State law.
This report also contains Recorder statistics that are kept on a calendar year basis. For 2022 the number of recorded deeds decreased 21.4% from calendar year 2021 while the total number of recorded documents decreased 32.0%. Total Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT) decreased 12.3% over the prior year and was distributed to the County of Shasta $1,413,609, the City of Redding $516,230, the City of Anderson $52,335 for, and the City of Shasta Lake $36,242. Additional fees of $1,564,282 were collected and distributed to the State for the Building Homes and Jobs Act, as well as $43,546 collected on behalf of the District Attorney.
It is through the hard work, dedication, and professionalism of the employees in the Assessor-Recorder’s Office that this year’s work was completed. I want to thank them for their exceptional effort and dedicated public service.
Thank you for the privilege of serving as your Assessor-Recorder.
Leslie Morgan, Assessor-Recorder
At a basic tax rate of 1%, the assessment roll will fund schools and local government with over $232 million in revenue!
The Recorder collected DTT for 2022 of over $2 million dollars! 5 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ASSESSOR-RECORDER
The Assessor, a locally elected official, is responsible for locating, identifying the ownership, and determining the value of all assessable real and personal property within the County of Shasta. The Assessor must complete an annual assessment roll containing the assessed values for all properties subject to local assessment. The assessment roll must be submitted to the County Auditor by July 1st of each year.
The Assessor’s staff determines whether property that has changed ownership is subject to reappraisal under the provisions of Proposition 13. In addition, all new construction must be appraised in accordance with the law.
The Assessor’s staff maintains about 5,000 Assessor Parcel Maps as well as creates new maps based on cadastral data found on recorded surveys and maps. Assessor maps are also the base map for the County’s Geographic Information System (GIS). In addition, the Assessor’s cadastral mapping specialists keep track of all Tax Rate Area geographic boundaries to make sure the tax revenue goes to the correct entity. All this is done electronically allowing the Assessor’s Parcel Maps to be accessed by computer terminals.
Other functions of the Assessor include the granting of all legal exemptions, the defending of assessment appeals before the Assessment Appeals Board, the annual valuation of all business personal property and other taxable personal property such as boats and aircraft, and the Assessor’s staff must perform all mandatory property tax audits on business properties as defined by law.
The Recorder is responsible to examine, index, and electronically image all recordable documents submitted that meet statutory recording requirements. All vital records (births, deaths, and marriages) are filed with the Recorder. The Recorder must collect and account for all fees and transfer tax related to the recording of documents according to the law. In addition, the Recorder must preserve maps and other land records important to the history of Shasta County by using appropriate technology and by adopting proper storage methods.
The Recorder provides electronic access to recordings for the public in the Recorder’s lobby. The Recorder also has online access to recorded documents, available by paid subscription to title companies and other businesses, which streamlines the recording process in Shasta County.
The Assessor-Recorder’s Office maintains a web site (see below) with assessment and recording information available to download free. In addition, the Assessor’s Maps and assessment roll information may be viewed and printed. The Recorder’s Index of recorded documents may also be viewed on this site and vital records may be ordered on-line.
ASSESSOR-RECORDER CONTACTS
Assessor Website: https://www.shastacounty.gov/assessor Real Property: (530) 225-3600; [email protected] Personal Property: (530) 225-3640 [email protected] Exemptions: (530) 225-3636 [email protected]
Transfers: (530) 225-3600 [email protected]
Recorder Website: https://www.shastacounty.gov/recorder Recordings: (530) 225-5671 [email protected]
Vital Records: (530) 225-5678 [email protected] 6 ASSESSOR-RECORDER ORGAZATIONAL CHART
Shasta County
Assessor-Recorder
Leslie Morgan
Deputy Assessor-Recorder
Valuation
Appraisal Manager -
Audit
Auditor Appraiser III
Auditor Appraiser II
Auditor Appraiser II
Appraisal Manager -
Real Property
Senior Specialist
Real Property
Appraiser
Real Property
Appraiser III
Real Property
Appraiser III
Real Property
Appraiser II
Real Property
Appraiser II
Real Property
Appraiser I
Real Property
Appraiser Aide
Appraisal Manager -
Real Property
Senior Specialist
Real Property
Appraiser
Real Property
Appraiser III
Real Property
Appraiser III
Real Property
Appraiser II
Real Property
Appraiser II
Real Property
Appraiser I
VACANT
Real Property
Appraiser I
Real Property
Appraiser Aide
Inter-Deptartmental
Systems Coordinator
Agency Staff Services
Analyst II
Deputy Assessor-Recorder
Administration
Program Manager -
Roll Production
Supervising
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist III
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist II
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist II
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist II
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist II
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist I
Senior AssessorRecorder Specialist
UNDERFILLED
Senior AssessorRecorder Specialist
Program Manager -
Mapping &
Transfers
Mapping
Specialist II
Mapping
Specialist I
Senior AssessorRecorder Specialist
Senior AssessorRecorder Specialist
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist I
Program Manager -
Recorder
Supervising
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist III
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist III
VACANT
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist I/II/II
VACANT
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist I/II/II
VACANT
Assessor-Recorder
Specialist I/II/III
Senior AssessorRecorder Specialist
Senior AssessorRecorder Specialist
7 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR TAXABLE VALUES
LOCAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CHANGE
THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
The annual assessment roll is based on the value of all property as of the January 1 Lien Date.
Assessment roll growth is determined by the combined net annual assessment of transfers of ownership, new construction, the annual statutory increase, business and personal property, and exemptions.
What’s behind the changes?
This chart displays the year-to-year
changes in values which effect of
assessed values.
• New Construction
• Changes in Ownership
• Prop 13 – Base Year Value
adjustments for CPI
• Prop 8 – Market Value
reviews 0
200,000,000
400,000,000
600,000,000
800,000,000
1,000,000,000
1,200,000,000
1,400,000,000
1,600,000,000
2017
to
2018
2018
to
2019
2019
to
2020
2020
to
2021
2021
to
2022
2022
to
2023
Roll Growth by Type
Prop 8 increases New Construc�on Prop 13 Change in Ownership 8 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR TAXABLE VALUES
BY CITY / UNINCORPORATED
CITY OF ANDERSON
CITY OF REDDING
No. ASMTS LAND IMPR/FIXT PERS PROP GROSS EXEMPTIONS NET Anderson 4,393 Sec 271,657,517 811,856,568 11,383,043 1,094,897,128 (90,267,044) 1,004,630,084 565 UnSec 2,660,238 17,896,411 45,518,292 66,074,941 (6,566,268) 59,508,673 4,958 Total 274,317,755 829,752,979 56,901,335 1,160,972,069 (96,833,312) 1,064,138,757 2022 Asmt Roll 4,929 Total 263,138,582 761,733,814 45,552,168 1,070,424,564 (104,794,948) 965,629,616 % Change 0.59% 4.25% 8.93% 24.91% 8.46% -7.60% 10.20%
2023 TAXABLE VALUES
9 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR TAXABLE VALUES
BY CITY / UNINCORPORATED
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE
UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF SHASTA COUNTY
10 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR TAXABLE VALUES
BY SCHOOL DISTRICT
11 CEMETERY
0.21%
CHURCH
0.22%
COLLEGE
3.53%
DISABLED
VETERANS
13.61%
HISTORICAL AIRCRAFT
HOMEOWNERS 0.02%
18.72%
HOSPITAL
12.46%
LIBRARY /
MUSEUM
0.13%
LOW VALUE
0.05%
PRIVATE SCHOOL
0.32%
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
RELIGIOUS 0.43%
10.39%
WELFARE
39.91%
Other
1.37%
SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR TAXABLE VALUES
PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS
PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS
The California Constitution states that all property is taxable unless there is an exemption granted. * These exemptions are codified in the California Constitution and the Revenue and Taxation Code.
Exemptions granted to organizations formed and operated exclusively for qualifying purposes (religious, scientific, hospital or charitable) must meet specific organizational and property use requirements for the exemption to be granted.
Homeowners and disabled veterans may also qualify for an exemption on their principal place of residence. The Homeowners’ Exemption lowers your assessed value by $7,000 for a property tax savings of approximately $70 to $80 annually and is an important designation for intergenerational base year transfer claims. The Disabled Veterans’ Exemption value is based on qualifying factors.
12 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT HISTORY
PROPOSITION 13 - ASSESSMENT ROLL GROWTH
PROPOSITION 13
Passed by the voters in June 1978, Proposition 13 (Prop. 13) amended the California Constitution, limiting the assessment and taxation of property in California. It restricts both the tax rate and the annual increase of assessed value as follows:
• The property tax cannot exceed one percent of a property’s taxable value (plus service fees, improvement bonds and special assessments, many of which require voter approval). • A property’s original base value is its 1975–76 market value. A new base year value is established by reappraisal whenever there is a change in ownership or new construction. An increase in the assessed value of real property is limited to no more than two percent per year. • The adjusted (factored) base year value of real property is the upper limit of value for property tax purposes.
• Business property, boats, airplanes, and certain restricted properties are subject to annual reappraisal and assessment.
Proposition 13 generally limits assessed value growth to two percent annually, except for the reassessment of transfers of ownership or new construction. The limit is tied to the California Consumer Price Index (CCPI). In 2021–2022, the CCPI was just 1.036 percent for properties not affected by transfers of ownership or new construction, creating a loss in anticipated property tax revenue for schools and local government.
Who Benefits from Prop. 13?
Every property owner benefits from Prop. 13. However, the longer a property is owned, the greater the property tax benefit. Some change in ownership transactions qualify for an “exclusion” from reassessment. Examples of change in ownership exclusions include interspousal (marriage, death, divorce) and intergenerational (parent/child and grandparent/grandchild) transfers. $0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
1978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023 Billions
$ 24,524,661,673
$1,778,046,200
TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE HAS INCREASED 1379% IN 45 YEARS
13 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT HISTORY
SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS
SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS
Supplemental assessments were created by Senate Bill 813 in 1983 to close inequities in Proposition
13. Whenever there is a reappraisal due to a change in ownership (e.g., property bought or sold) or due to the completion of new construction, State law requires the County Assessor to determine a new base year value for the property.
A notice of Supplemental Assessment is then issued by the Assessor’s Office and sent to the owner at the address of record. Following this notice, a Supplemental Tax Bill is issued by the Tax Collector’s office.
The Supplemental Tax Bill is based on the difference between the prior value and the new reappraisal. This value is prorated for the number of months remaining in the fiscal year (July 1 to June 30). Usually, it is not prorated in escrow during purchase, nor is it paid by the lender through an impound account. Unlike the secured tax bill, lending agencies do not receive a copy of the Supplemental Tax Bill.
Supplemental tax is not reported in the annual assessment roll. The Assessor’s Office produces a supplemental roll that generates significant additional revenue. The entire new assessed value is then reflected on the tax roll the following fiscal year.
What about Prop. 19?
On November 3, 2020, voters approved the Home Protection for Seniors, Severely Disabled, Families and Victims of Wildfire or Natural Disasters Act, commonly known as Proposition 19. Prop. 19 made sweeping changes to a property owner’s ability to transfer their Prop. 13 assessed values by adjusting the value comparisons and adding the ability to transfer assessed values between counties. Prop 19 also narrowed property tax benefits for intergenerational transfers and added new transfer provisions for victims of disasters and the severely handicapped. 14 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT HISTORY
SECTION 51 VALUE REVIEWS (PROP 8)
PROPOSITION 8
Revenue & Taxation (R&T) Code Section 51 known as Prop 8 was passed by California voters in November 1978 and states that the taxable value of real property shall be the lesser of factored Base Year Value or Full Cash Value. The factored base year value is the assessed value as determined at the time of purchase or construction, increased each year by no more than two percent, or the CCPI, whichever is lower.
When the market value of a property declines below the factored base year value, the Assessor enrolls the lower fair market value of their property. Properties where the market value exceeds the assessed value as of lien date, are not eligible for an adjustment.
TEMPORARY DECLINES IN ASSESSED VALUE
The Base Year & Prop 8
Value History from 2008
through the current
assessment roll can be
seen in this chart. Leslie
Morgan and her team at
the Shasta County
Assessor’s Office
proactively reviewed nearly
half of the properties
during the peak of the
decline resulting in the
reduction of 30.56% of the
secured parcels.
1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 -10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
$-
$5,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000
$15,000,000,000
$20,000,000,000
19741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023 LAND IMPROVEMENTS PERSONALTY % CHANGE CPI
Prop 13 took effect in 1978
0 2,500,000,000
5,000,000,000
7,500,000,000
10,000,000,000
Year - Count
Value Reduc�on Base Year Value Prop 8-Market Value
15 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT HISTORY
OTHER ASSESSMENTS
BUSINESS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
All business and personal property is assessed annually at market value as of the January 1 Lien Date. Examples include computers, machinery, equipment, boats, airplanes, tractors, fixtures and furniture.
The assessed value of business and personal property is included on both the secured and unsecured roll and is derived from business property statements filed by taxpayers annually.
SECTION 170 – DISASTER RELIEF REVIEW OF CARR FIRE RESTORATIONS Revenue and Taxation Code section 170 provides that if a calamity such as fire, earthquake, or flooding damages or destroys property, the taxpayer may be eligible for property tax relief. In such cases, the assessor reappraises the property to reflect its damaged condition. In addition, when it is rebuilt in a like or similar manner, the property will retain its prior value (Proposition 13) for tax purposes.
In July 2018 Shasta County residents suffered greatly from the Carr fire. As a result, the Assessor’s staff enrolled 1,225 reductions which included 1,123 secured parcels. A review of the restorations and transfers for secured parcels enrolled is as follows:
COUNT VALUE
Secured Calamity Reductions Enrolled 1,123 $183,784,080
BASE YEAR VALUE RESTORATIONS ENROLLED
Assessment Roll Year 2019 21 $761,020
Assessment Roll Year 2020 129 $16,883,417
Assessment Roll Year 2021 135 $25,662,830
Assessment Roll Year 2022 40 $7,353,270
Assessment Roll Year 2023 15 $2,627,707
*Note - Values represent base year values restored. This does not include added new construction.
OTHER TRANSFERS
Change in Ownerships 358
Base Year Transfers to New Home 114
REMAINING CARR FIRE CLAIMS 315
OPEN PERMITS (CIP) - As of Jan 1, 2023 99
Beyond the Numbers - Customer Relations!
The most critical part of our services is assisting property owners as the navigate the complex laws of property tax assessment. Each encounter is an opportunity for our office to prove that we are here to help through our informative and professional interactions. The staff interactions inspire positive feedback from our customers through verbal and written communications. We are advocates for the taxpayers of Shasta County ensuring that assessed values are fair and equitable. 16 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT HISTORY
ASSESSMENT TEAM
THE ASSESSOR’S TEAM
The Assessor’s office has various sections within the department which specialize in each area and is overseen by the Assessor and two Deputy Assessor-Recorders.
Transfers and Mapping Staff works the documents coming from the Recorder’s office to set up appraisable events as well as initiating communications needed for any exclusions that may apply. In addition, the mapping specialists map new parcels, keep track Tax Rate Areas, and maintain the base map for GIS.
Valuation Specialized Support Staff process applications for many of the exemptions and exclusions that may apply to a properties assessment, input and track values associated with intergenerational and base year transfers, and input values and corrections processed by Real Property Appraisers.
Business and Personal Property Specialized Support Staff analyze discovery sources associated with businesses and other personal property such as boats and aircraft. Staff intakes annual filings for valuation, and input values and corrections processed by Auditor Appraisers.
Appraisal Staff includes Auditor Appraisers, Real Property Appraisers, Senior Specialist Real Property Appraisers, and Appraisal Managers. Over 50 percent of staff are professionally certified by the State of California. Appraisers provide assessment-related information to the public and interact with property owners or agents regarding property assessment appeals.
Other Specialized Staff focus on assessment topics such as exemptions, discovery, value processing, technology, and much more.
17 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS
COST PER ASSESSMENT
PERFORMANCE MEASURES – COST PER ASSESSMENT
Led by County Assessor Leslie Morgan, the Assessor’s Office has created Management Team approach to performance measurements. Through reporting qualitative data that tracks the timeliness of product delivery, accuracy of assessments and overall efficiency, these measures allow the Assessor to identify and record service levels from year to year, designed to achieve specific continuous improvement objectives. The data is compiled from the results of similar, more detailed measures in each Division of the Assessor’s Office. The performance measures were developed in collaboration with both line staff and managers.
What is an Assessment Practices Survey?
The State Board of Equalization (BOE) acts in an oversight capacity to ensure compliance by county assessors with property tax laws, regulations, and assessment issues. The BOE conducts periodic compliance audits (surveys) of the county assessors' programs and develops property tax assessment policies and informational materials to guide county assessors and local assessment appeals boards.
The Government Code mandates and outlines the assessment practices survey program. The purpose of the survey is to determine the adequacy of the procedures and practices the county assessor uses in valuing property and to evaluate the assessor's performance of mandated duties.
The survey concentrates on statutory mandates and revenue-related issues.
The BOE also compiles data to be used for comparing administrative and assessment operations with those of other Assessors. See State Average * in the below chart. 18 SHASTA COUNTY ASSESSOR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS
ASSESSMENT APPEALS
PERFORMANCE MEASURES – ASSESSMENT APPEALS
Property owners are encouraged to review their assessments relative to the market value of their property as of January 1. Owners should contact the Assessor’s Office for an informal review if they believe their assessment is greater than the market value of the property as of the lien date. If, during the informal review, analysis of new information results in a revised determination of market value, the Assessor will change the assessment before the end of the formal filing period.
Shasta County Sample Results!
The BOE staff also performs appraisal samples of five county assessment rolls as a component of the survey or as a stand-alone report. These samples are used by Assessors to ensure that their values being enrolled are accurate and certifies the eligibility of the county to continue to recover costs associated with administering supplemental assessments.
Shasta County was sampled in March 2023 with
an indicated average assessment ratio of
99.76%
19 SHASTA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXES
General Revenue By Source / Percentage of Each Tax Dollar
PROPERTY TAXES AND GENERAL REVENUE
This tax is of major importance as the largest single revenue source for the support of municipal and school district services. Property tax is a local tax to finance local governments and public schools.
The Assessor’s job is to accurately assess all property in Shasta County in accordance with the California Revenue and Taxation Code; therefore, as homeowners benefit from the difference between assessed values and market values, it comes with an offset to schools and local governments dependent on property tax revenue to provide quality education and public services.
PROPERTY TAX is the largest source of
discretionary revenue available to the
County.
Shasta County 2021-22 Actuals from the
2023-24 Recommended Budget
Where Do My Property Taxes Go?
A portion of the property tax you pay remains in the local community for services. The beneficiaries of property tax revenue are public schools, community colleges, the
County and our three cities. More than 50 percent of local property tax revenue generated in Shasta County goes to fund public education.
Counties, cities, towns, school districts and special
districts use property taxes to fund schools, police and fire protection, road maintenance and many other municipal
services.
20 SHASTA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXES
CALIFORNIA STATE (BOE) ROLL vs LOCAL ASSESSOR’S ROLL
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION (BOE) ROLL VS LOCAL ASSESSOR’S ROLL The BOE is responsible for assessing property owned or used by certain public utilities and other specified companies operating in California, enabling counties to use those values to collect local property taxes.
The BOE’s State-Assessed Properties Division (SAPD) is responsible for annually preparing value recommendations for each state assessee. These indicators and recommendations, which are developed annually from information provided by state assessees, are used by the elected Board to determine the fair market value of the assessee’s unitary property. State-assessed property is not subject to the provisions of Proposition 13 and is assessed at its fair market value as of 12:01 a.m. each January 1.
How does Shasta County
get values allocated from
the State?
The Property values on the stateassessed roll are allocated by the BOE to the counties where the
properties are located. Each
county levies, bills, and collects
the tax directly from state
assessees, based upon the
allocated values. The taxes are
levied at the same rate that is
applied to locally assessed
property.
21 SHASTA COUNTY RECORDER
DOCUMENTS RECORDED AND FILED
RECORDED DOCUMENTS
The Recorder, upon payment of the proper fees and taxes, accepts for recordation any instrument, paper, or notice which is authorized or required by law to be recorded. Prior to recordation, these documents must contain sufficient information to be indexed as required by statute and be photographically reproducible.
Why Public Records?
The Office of the County Recorder is extremely important in the legal structure of our society. The right to own property under our system of government is a part of the freedoms we enjoy. Without the ability to prove property ownership rights, individuals would be unable to protect their land or maintain land rights as an asset. Early in history the United States created a recording system and Shasta County’s documents date back to its origins in 1850.
YEAR DEEDS DEEDS OF TRUSTEE'S RECONS NOTICE OF LIENS & MAPS MISC TOTAL * TRUST DEEDS DEFAULTS ABST JDGS DOCS
1997 8,254 8,028 377 6,373 775 4,279 175 15,251 43,512
1998 9,154 10,365 404 8,851 833 5,558 121 17,199 52,485 1999 9,450 9,865 361 9,569 719 3,476 114 16,247 49,801
2000 9,923 8,830 355 7,382 767 5,672 136 14,738 47,803
2001 11,035 12,717 303 10,980 656 5,074 133 15,292 56,190 2002 12,969 17,030 198 16,136 586 5,623 142 15,825 68,509 2003 13,922 23,089 115 23,884 487 5,849 150 17,979 85,475 2004 13,893 19,879 73 17,408 390 5,842 135 16,959 74,579 2005 14,466 20,979 26 19,542 410 5,140 165 17,181 77,909 2006 11,338 16,659 76 15,455 606 4,806 176 16,746 65,862 2007 9,615 12,518 361 12,149 1,104 4,995 167 16,638 57,547 2008 7,279 6,989 732 7,223 1,529 5,079 130 15,058 44,019 2009 6,908 6,601 978 7,211 1,897 5,162 82 15,154 43,993 2010 6,557 5,388 1,107 5,781 1,765 4,770 77 15,860 41,305 2011 6,952 4,901 1,214 5,391 1,679 4,666 47 19,724 44,574 2012 8,530 7,511 962 7,822 1,371 3,678 54 22,452 52,380 2013 8,786 7,788 451 9,134 681 3,045 64 21,903 51,852
2014 7,813 5,344 400 5,894 622 3,005 64 16,672 39,814
2015 8,181 6,699 333 7,364 511 2,702 65 18,299 44,154
2016 8,863 7,331 287 7,747 489 3,121 57 19,029 46,924
2017 9,079 6,869 219 7,612 399 3,200 62 18,510 45,950
2018 8,322 6,174 197 6,733 333 4,031 39 16,692 42,521
2019 8,555 7,491 160 7,335 371 4,458 62 18,393 46,825
2020 9,440 11,138 68 11,338 144 3,816 54 20,874 56,872
2021 11,113 12,226 48 12,777 106 4,156 49 23,457 63,932 2022 8,730 6,654 73 6,400 261 4,382 52 16,914 43,466
*Calendar year
The Recorder maintains a permanent public record of documents related to the ownership and encumbrance of real property located in Shasta County. 22 SHASTA COUNTY RECORDER
OTHER AGENCY FEES
OTHER FEES COLLECTED AT RECORDING
In addition to recording fees, the recorder collects and distributes other fees that have been set by statute to be collected at the time of recording and allocated to the appropriate agency.
Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT)
Revenue and Taxation Code section
11911 establishes that each deed,
instrument, or writing which conveys a
property interest shall pay DTT at the
rate of fifty-five cents ($0.55) for each
five hundred dollars ($500) or fractional
part thereof.
Building Homes & Jobs Act (SB2)
Effective January 1, 2018, Government Code section
27388.1 requires that documents accepted for recording be charged an additional seventy-five dollars ($75) fee unless a valid exemption applies and has been declared on the
document prior to recording.
District Attorney Fraud Fee
Government Code section 27388 allows the District Attorney of the county to establish a fee of up to ten dollars ($10) to fund programs to enhance the capacity of local police and prosecutors to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud crimes. Shasta County collects $3 under GC§27388. $15,204
$11,834
$9,385
$7,123
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
2022 by Quarter
23 SHASTA COUNTY RECORDER
HISTORICAL DOCUMENT STATISTICS
PUBLIC RECORDS FOR TITLE SEARCHES
This office contains records relating to real estate from 1851 to present. All records are truly public in nature (with the exception of birth, death, and marriage records) and are, by law, available for your inspection. The original documents are never kept by this office, but are copied by Recorder’s personnel, at first by hand (years 1851 to 1907), then by typing (years 1908 to 1952), then by photography (years 1952 to 1982) by micrographics (years 1982 to 1998), and finally by electronic imaging starting in 1999.
A property title search examines public records on the property to confirm the property’s rightful legal owner. The title search should also reveal if there are any claims or liens on the property that could affect your purchase. Our staff is available to show you where the indexes and the books to which they refer are located, but we cannot give legal advice nor do a search for you. You may search the Official Records Index for documents that have been recorded.
Deeds are a written instrument which, when properly executed and delivered, transfers title to real estate.
24 SHASTA COUNTY RECORDER
VITAL RECORDS AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
VITAL RECORDS
The Recorder maintains vital records such as Birth, Death, and Marriage certificates. Only certain individuals are allowed to receive an authorized certified copy of a birth, death, or marriage record. An authorized certified copy of a birth record is required to obtain a driver's license, passport, social security card and other services related to an individual's identity.
Informational Certified Copies
Those who are not authorized or do not wish to submit the notarized Certificate of Identity may receive an Informational Certified Copy. Informational Certified Copies have the words "INFORMATIONAL, NOT A VALID DOCUMENT TO ESTABLISH IDENTITY," imprinted across the face of the copy.
Authorized vs. Informational Certified Copies
Authorized copies are used for legal purposes.
Informational copies are used for mostly non-legal purposes and ancestry.
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT MODIFICATIONS (AB1466)
Current law prohibits public documents from being recorded with discriminatory or restrictive covenant language (i.e., age, race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, veteran or military status, genetic information, or national origin). The recent passing of Assembly Bill 1466 (AB 1466) aims to remove any discriminatory or restrictive covenant language on historical public records.
The Recorder has implemented a comprehensive search and review of documents recorded in Shasta County. Historical recorded documents found that contain unlawful discriminatory or restrictive covenant language are redacted and re-recorded. The full scope of the implementation can be viewed on the Recorder’s website.
286 Restrictive Covenant Modifications
Recorded to Date!
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 MARRIAGES 1,049 1,204 1,035 1,086 1,084 1,117 1,117 1,166 1,069 1,031 1,025 994 974 854 988 956 DEATHS 2,188 2,275 2,070 2,230 2,241 2,243 2,341 2,315 2,466 2,471 2,510 2,539 2436 2690 3030 2769 BIRTHS 2,389 2,287 2,243 2,259 2,189 2,113 2,172 2,125 2,196 2,170 2,134 2,072 1965 1795 1864 1814
CALENDAR YEAR
0 500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 25 Protecting public health since 1919
ANNUAL REPORT
2022
26 On behalf of the Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District (SMVCD) Board of Trustees and staff, I am pleased to present the 2022 Annual Report. The SMVCD annual report is a testament to our organization’s unyielding dedication to public health and our commitment to excellence. It highlights the progress made in expanding our knowledge base through research and innovation, adopting advanced technologies, and embracing sustainable practices that ensure the preservation of our environment.
This year we experienced an unprecedented drought resulting in something we’ve never witnessed in our 103 years as an agency, the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District canal remained dry throughout the entire season and had no irrigation allocations throughout the District area. This development provided the District with a strange season with minimal activity in areas where agricultural operations often keep our staff busy throughout the mosquito months.
In addition to the unusual year, we continued to see increases in both abundance and distribution of our invasive species, Aedes aegypti, and to a lesser degree, Aedes albopictus. The District continues to be challenged, redirecting resources to the invasive species prevention program in an effort to eliminate these non-native populations. In 2023 we will reassess the invasive species program providing new direction to better manage potential risks associated with this increase in abundance.
In the pages that follow, you will find a detailed account of the initiatives, strategies, and outcomes that have defined our endeavors over the past year. Our dedicated staff, equipped with their expertise and relentless commitment, have implemented robust surveillance programs to monitor vector populations, identify potential breeding sites, and implement targeted control measures. I extend my deepest appreciation to the staff of the Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District for their tireless dedication, as well as to our partners and the residents of Shasta County for their ongoing cooperation. Together, we will continue to safeguard the health and well-being of our community.
Finally, we must highlight the career and contributions of John Albright, our retiring Scientific Operations Manager. John started with the District in 1997, taking on the role of Biologist and Public Information Specialist. Over time his role and responsibilities evolved to his final title of Scientific Operations Manager. John brought a philosophy of innovation, dedication and consistency that moved our surveillance and research department to new heights. Thanks to his efforts, SMVCD is well known throughout California as a top-rated mosquito district. Thank you, John, for over 25 years of service. Enjoy your next adventure!
Sincerely,
Peter Bonkrude
District Manager
Philip Cramer
President
FOREWORD
Our Mission:
“To protect the
public’s health from
vector-borne disease
and nuisance, through
a comprehensive
mosquito and vector
control program
focused on innovation,
experience and
efficiency.”
27 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD
Message from the District Manager
DISTRICT OVERVIEW
Board & Staff
District History
Integrated Vector Management
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Service Requests
IMMATURE MOSQUITO CONTROL
Physical Control
Biological Control
Chemical Control
Catch Basin Program
Swimming Pool Program
ADULT MOSQUITO CONTROL
Chemical Control
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
New Information & Development
VECTOR SURVEILLANCE
Tick Surveillance
Mosqiuto Surveillance
DISEASE SURVEILLANCE
Local Disease Surveillance
Invasive Aedes
State Disease Surveillance
OUTREACH
Public Education
FINANCIALS
Finance Report Breakdown
John’s Retirement
2 4
6 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
16 17
18 20
21 22
23 24
This Annual Report was made as an interdepartmental
collaboration. Special thanks to Jenna Ingebretsen,
Peter Bonkrude, Darcy Buckalew, Kendra AngelAdkinson, Garrett Hawkinson, and Mike Alexander for their many contributions.
28 DISTRICT
HEADQUARTERS
Dave Maron
Vice President
Shasta County
Philip Cramer
President
City of Redding
Benjamin Hanna
Shasta County
Ann Morningstar
Secretary
City of Shasta Lake
BOARD OF
TRUSTEES
DISTRICT STAFF
Monty Currier
Operations Manager
Kelly Cleland
Mike Alexander
Field Supervisors
Al Shabazian
Brady Benton
Corey Boyer
Darrell Bible
Haley Bastien
Reid Sheeks
Robert Ault
Vector Technicians
OPERATIONS STAFF
Melissa Hunt
City of Anderson
4 29
LABORATORY STAFF
John Albright
Scientific Operations Manager
Kendra Angel-Adkinson
Vector Biologist
Garrett Hawkinson
Vector Biologist
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
Peter Bonkrude, MS
District Manager
Darcy Buckalew
Administrative Manager
Jenna Ingebretsen
Administrative Analyst II
STAFF
HIGHLIGHTS
TOTAL YEARS
OF SERVICE
191
EMPLOYEES WITH
10-19 YEARS OF SERVICE
8 EMPLOYEES WITH
20+ YEARS OF SERVICE
3 16
FULL-TIME
STAFF
AVERAGE
YEARS OF SERVICE
12 30
5 INTEGRATED VECTOR
MANAGEMENT
Integrated Vector Management
(IVM) is an evidence-based, datadriven decision-making process used to help protect the citizens
of Shasta County. This strategy
attempts to suppress vectorborne diseases. This approach prioritizes surveillance of mosquito
populations, mosquito-borne
disease testing, removal of
breeding sites, public outreach
and education, and research and
quality control. IVM incorporates
various tools to target mosquitoes
at different life stages which can
include physical control, biological
control, and chemical control.
These applications rely on a range
of control interventions, separately
or in combinations, with the goal of
balancing cost and effectiveness.
Celebration of Shasta
Mosquito & Vector
Control District’s
100 years protecting
public health
DISTRICT HISTORY
Protecting public health since 1919
6 31
January February March April May June July August September October November December 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
Count of servicereq
SRsbyMonth/Year
YEAR
2021
2018
2019
2020
2022
The trend of count of servicereq for Servicereqdatetime Month. Color shows details about Servicereqdatetime Year. The view is filtered on Servicereqdatetime Year, which keeps 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.
SERVICE REQUESTS
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
1 Map based on Longitude (generated) and Latitude (generated). Color shows count of servicereq. Details are shown for Zip. The data is filtered on Servicereqdatetime, which ranges from 1/1/2022 12 00 00 AM to 12/31/2022 3 41 00 PM. 1 101
SRbyZIP
Service Requests by Zipcode
60.73%
32.49%
5.37% 1.41%
60.73%
32.49%
5.37%
1.41%
SR Reason
Adult Mosquito Issues
Neglected Swimming Pool
Neglected Pools and Mosquito Issues
Mosquito Issues and Mosquitofish
hows details about Chkdeadbird, Chkmosfish, Chknegpool and 1 more (Combined). Size shows % of Total Count of servicereq. Details are shown for ges from 1/1/2022 9 55 00 AM to 12/31/2022 12 00 00 AM. The view is filtered on Exclusions (Chkdeadbird,Chkmosfish,Chknegpool,Chkservicereq) . The Exclusions (Chkdeadbird,Chkmosfish,Chknegpool,Chkservicereq) filter keeps 11 members. The Chkdeadbird, Chkmosfish, Chknegpool and 1 more le table.
Service Requests by Type
As part of our public health
mission, District staff value and
prioritize providing responsive
and professional service to
our District residents. Service
requests serve as the first step
for some of our surveillance
efforts. During these service
requests, we can learn from
the public and hear their issues,
while sharing our knowledge
and expertise. We respond to a
variety of requests for service
including biting mosquitoes,
mosquitofish requests, neglected
swimming pool reports and
insect identification inquiries.
These requests help focus our
efforts and provide information
that is essential to our IVM
response. This year we received
405 requests for service. On
our website, the public can
issue a service request 24/7,
find information about our
current mosquito conditions
and response, and even find out
where we are performing our
adult mosquito control activities.
Grand Total 405
Anderson 63
Palo Cedro 30
Shingletown 28
City of Shasta Lake 28
Cottonwood 19
Lakehead 6
Bella Vista 6
Igo & Ono 5
Castella 4
Millville 3
Shasta 2
yCity
2 211
Service Requests
1 Redding 211
Service Requests by Community
January February March April May June July August September October November December 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
Count of servicereq
SRsbyMonth/Year
YEAR
2021
2018
2019
2020
2022
The trend of count of servicereq for Servicereqdatetime Month. Color shows details about Servicereqdatetime Year. The view is filtered on Servicereqdatetime Year, which keeps 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.
Service Requests by Month, 2018-2022
32 7
IMMATURE MOSQUITO
CONTROL
Immature mosquito control
begins with the elimination of
mosquito larvae and pupae before
development progresses and the
mosquitoes emerge as breeding
adults. This involves physical,
biological, and chemical controls.
Sources for these efforts typically
include neglected swimming pools,
untreated water catch basins, tree
holes, seasonal creeks, residential,
agriculture, and industrial areas.
Swimming Pools
Residential
Natural
Invasive Aedes
Industrial
Agricultural Catch Basins
Vernal Pools
Inspection by Site Type
Site Type
Agricu
Catch
Indust
Invasi
Natur
Reside
Swimm
Verna
Site Type (group). Color shows details about Site Type (group). Size shows count of source_activity. The marks are labeled by Site Type (group). The data is filtered on Inspection and Material Name (group) 1. The Inspection filter ranges from 1/1/2022 3 27 00 PM to 12/31/2022 12 00 00 AM. The Material Name (group) 1 filter keeps Null, BioControl and Larval Control. The view is filtered on Site Type (group), which excludes Herbicide, Inspected 5 years ago, Treated 5 or more yrs ago, Treated Last Year and Zones.
Inspections
By Type
PHYSICAL
CONTROL
The most effective and long-lasting
approach to control mosquitoes is
the reduction of mosquito habitat.
Modification or elimination of these
habitats reduces sources that can
be exploited by mosquitoes for
production. These techniques vary
from clearing dense vegetation,
to burning cleared debris piles,
and modifying landscapes with
heavy equipment. A big part of
mosquito reduction involves the
use of heavy equipment as well as
hand dug trenches. These physical
control projects re-direct standing
water, leading to easier biological
and chemical controls by District
technicians.
Mosquito larvae, pupae, and
adults in a hatching container.
8 33
BIOLOGICAL
CONTROL
Biological control at the District
consists of the release of
mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis).
These fish are introduced into
waters pre or post discovery
of mosquito larvae living in a
body of water. Mosquitofish are
a useful tool that is proven to
reduce or eliminate mosquitoes
from aquatic spaces. These
small-bodied, live-bearing fish
have the strong ability to live in
confined small spaces such as
animal watering troughs. These
adaptive fish benefit the District
since they can live in various water
conditions, reproduce frequently,
and produce many young. The
usual life span for mosquitofish
is relatively short and does not
cause substantial competition for
native fishes or aquatic life when
planted in appropriate habitats. The
District made 586 mosquito fish
applications in 2022.
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
FishMap
February October 2022
MONTH
Map based on average of Lat Lng - Split 1 and average of Lat Lng - Split 2. Color shows details about Treatment Month. Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Material Name, Treatment and Material Name (group). The Material Name filter excludes Null. The Treatment filter ranges from 1/1/2022 12 00 00 AM to 12/31/2022 2 03 00 PM. The Material Name (group) filter keeps Mosquito Fish.
February October 2022
MONTH
tment Month. Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Material Name, Treatment and Material 00 AM to 12/31/2022 2 03 00 PM. The Material Name (group) filter keeps Mosquito Fish.
Fish Planted
by Month
34 9
The District uses a variety of
target-specific chemical products
to reduce the number of adult
mosquitoes. The term larvicide
p
Immature Control Products
Microbials
Spinosad
Surface Oils
Juvenile Growth Inhibitor
- Split 1 and average of Lat Lng - Split 2. Color shows details about Material Name (group). Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Material Name and Treatment. The . The Treatment filter ranges from 1/1/2022 12 00 00 AM to 12/31/2022 7 33 00 AM. The view is filtered on Material Name (group), which excludes 36 members.
Immature Control Products
Microbials
Spinosad
Surface Oils
Juvenile Growth Inhibitor
ils are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Material Name and Treatment. The ew is filtered on Material Name (group), which excludes 36 members.
CHEMICAL
CONTROL
refers to any product that
specifically targets mosquitoes in
their larval stage. This is the most
common control used by District
staff. These larval chemicals target
young mosquitoes before emerging
into adulthood. Control products
include microbial products,
natural toxins, growth inhibitors
and surface oils. Having a variety
of chemical products to choose
allows technicians to treat any
habitat from large areas to small
containers. In addition, the rotation
of different chemical classes makes
larval control more efficaceous.
Before treatment, staff calculate
surface area/ volume with precisely
the right type and prescribed
amounts of material needed to
eliminate vector promoting insects.
In 2022, District staff made
2,775 applications to immature
mosquitoes. Sources treated with
chemical control products often
need to be re-inspected regularly to
ensure the product is still producing
the level of control sufficient to
prevent emerging adults.
10 35
CATCH BASIN
PROGRAM
Catch basins, the underground
section of storm drain systems
in neighborhoods, streets, and
parking lots, are an important
habitat for the immature stages of
disease mosquitoes, Culex tarsalis
and Culex pipiens. The District has
added about 10,000 catch basins
to its records, and spends time
each season inspecting and treating
these areas. In May, our focus
was specific to catch basins that
have only been treated once in the
previous 5 years, with the more
problematic basins being treated in
August and September. A total of
nearly 1,500 basins were inspected;
of those inspected, 1,027 needed
treatments. Most of the treatments
this year were with a mosquito
growth regulator. Some catch
basins were treated with a new
product containing an extended
release pouch with the same active
ingredient which showed very
promising results, lasting from
three to five months, even in basins
where other larvicides typically
work for only 4-8 weeks.
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Catchbasin
Map based on average of Lat Lng - Split 1 and average of Lat Lng - Split 2. Color shows details about Material Name (group) 2. Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Treatment Month, No Treat Treatment Year. The Treatment Month filter keeps 13 of 13 members. The No Treat Flag filter keeps Treated. The Site Type (group) filter keeps Catch Basins. The Treatment Year filter keeps 2022.
Material Name
Surface Oils
Growth Regulator
Microbials
Lng - Split 2. Color shows details about Material Name (group) 2. Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Treatment Month, No Treat Flag, Site Type (group) and members. The No Treat Flag filter keeps Treated. The Site Type (group) filter keeps Catch Basins. The Treatment Year filter keeps 2022.
Catch Basins Treated
By Product
36 11
SWIMMING POOL
PROGRAM
When a swimming pool is
unmaintained it becomes a perfect
place for mosquitoes to breed.
One pool can breed millions of
mosquitoes over the course of
a summer, if left untreated. Our
District identifies neglected
swimming pools by using public
reports, aerial imaging, and
technician inspections.
Each year, the staff inspects 100’s
of pools and treats those that have
mosquito breeding potential.
During the winter and early spring
of 2022, staff treated 79 pools.
During the summer, our District
contracted an aerial service
provider to detect neglected
swimming pools. A total of 91 pools
were treated by staff with chemical
control products and mosquito fish.
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Swimmingpools
Material Name
Growth Regulator
Mosquito Fish
Spinosad
Surface Oils
Map based on average of Lat Lng - Split 1 and average of Lat Lng - Split 2. Color shows details about Material Name (group). Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Site Type, Treatment and No Treat Flag. The Site Type filter keeps 6 of 37 members. The Treatment filter ranges from 1/1/2022 12 00 00 AM to 12/31/2022 12 00 00 AM. The No Treat Flag filter keeps Not Treated2 and Treated.
Material Name
Growth Regulator
Mosquito Fish
Spinosad
Surface Oils
tails about Material Name (group). Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Site Type, Treatment and No Treat Flag. The Site Type filter 31/2022 12 00 00 AM. The No Treat Flag filter keeps Not Treated2 and Treated.
Pools Treated By Product
12 37
ADULT MOSQUITO
CONTROL
Controlling adult mosquitoes is
one of the most important tools to
reduce disease transmission when
active outbreaks are occurring.
These applications can immediately
reduce the number of biting
mosquitoes in an area thereby
lowering the risk of mosquitoborne disease transmission.
This becomes essential when
adult mosquito numbers reach
high enough levels to jeopardize
residents’ health and quality of
life. Although adult mosquito
control has its limitations, it is
still an important tool in disease
prevention. These limitations
mean the District must apply the
adult mosquito control operations
with several other IVM tools
including an aggressive immature
control program, increased
community outreach for bite
prevention, and as much mosquito
source reduction as is feasible.
No additional precautions are
required for our residents during
these control operations because
of the low application rates,
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
AppMap-Adult
Map based on average of Lat Lng - Split 1 and average of Lat Lng - Split 2. Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Material Name and Treatment. The Material Name filter keeps 15 of 75 members. The Treatment filter ranges from 1/1/2022 12 00 00 AM to 12/31/2022 12 59 00 PM.
1 1
Adult Mosquito Control Routes
Staff perform whole
neighborhood routes in response
to adult mosquito populations
and/or disease incidents.
typically less than 3 ounces per
acre. Additionally, the size of the
droplet, the time of application
(dusk/dawn), and the knowledge
of critical habitats mitigate nontarget impacts. Our applications are made dynamically, in response
to our adult surveillance. This
could mean applications are made
the same night or next day, as
the trap data is processed. This
level of responsiveness ensures
we can move fast enough to
prevent human disease. This
year due to the drought we only
made 262 adult control routes
covering over 49,000 acres, a 33%
reduction. Residents can visit our
website: www.shastamosquito.
org to review where and when
our adult mosquito control will be
conducted, or to subscribe to our
spray notifications via email or text
message.
1 101
SRbyZIP
1 24
38 13
The CDC bottle bioassay allows the
District to determine if resistence
is present in a population before
the efficacy of field applications
are affected, allowing management
decisions to be made in a timely
enough manner to preserve
susceptibility to that chemical.
Bottle bioassays were developed as
a rapid, simple, and economical way
to determine if a particular adult
control active ingredient is effective
on local field collected mosquitoes.
During the bioassay, a bottle is
coated with a known amount of
insecticide called the diagnostic
dose. Mosquitoes are then placed
into the bottle and observed for a
period of time. The potential for
resistance is determined by the
percentage of mosquitoes that die.
The time that it takes for the wild
mosquitoes to die is compared to
the susceptible mosquitoes.
In 2022, the District ran
mosquitoes from two separate
locations, analyzing three different
adult control products, pyrethrum,
BOTTLE BIOASSAYS
permethrin and malathion. Samples
of Culex pipiens mosquitoes
were tested. The largest level of
potential tolerance occurred in
the pyrethrum product. However,
when cage trials are implemented
with the synergized product, we
still see adequate performance.
To effectively assess whether
resistance is impacting efficacy
of adult mosquito control, actual
formulated mosquito control
products must be also tested under
field conditions.
RESEARCH &
DEVELOPMENT
14 39
Cage trials are used to evaluate
not only susceptibility in a wild
mosquito population but also
product efficacy under field
conditions. Wild type mosquitoes
and lab reared mosquitoes are each
placed in separate mesh cages
which are suspended on tripod
stands. These tripods are placed
on a predetermined grid, so each
is a precise distance from the truck
and each other. After evaluating
CAGE TRIALS the weather conditions, the truck
mounted ultra-low volume fogger
applies an adulticide just as it does
during control operations. The
caged mosquitoes are exposed to
the application, and then returned
to the district grounds for staff to
monitor and assess mortality. These
trials take place over one to several
evenings every year for comparison
over time. In conjunction with
bottle bioassays, the results provide
insight into potential resistance in
local mosquito populations.
The Biogents Counter (BGC) is
an accessory device compatible
with several Biogents (BG) traps
commonly used by District staff.
The advantage of the BGC is that it
counts the number of mosquitoes
entering the trap and reports the
sum in 15-minute intervals. This
provides an incredibly precise
record of mosquito abundance at
a fine temporal scale. The common
BIOGENTS COUNTER
refrain of mosquito activity is that
they are most active ‘at dusk and
dawn’. The BGC shows activity
peaks whenever they occur- with
occasionally surprising results. From
March through October 2022, the
BGC was affixed atop a BG trap
where it monitored and reported
the trap counts to a website.
7 8 9
1 2 3
4 6
CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild
300ft
100ft
TRUCK ROUTE
Merus
100% 42%
100% 21% 100%
0% 8%
88% 56%
73% 100% 100% 100%
38% 100% 6%
100% 17%
7 8 9
1 2 3
6 CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild
TRUCK ROUTE
Perm-X 3030
100% 92%
100% 68% 100%
100% 93%
100% 90%
100% 100% 100% 100%
100% 100% 62%
100% 90%
7 8 9
1 2 3
4 6
CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild
300ft
100ft
TRUCK ROUTE
Fyfanon
7 8 9
1 2 3
4 6
CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild
300ft
100ft
TRUCK ROUTE
Merus
100% 42%
100% 21% 100%
0% 8%
88% 56%
73% 100% 100% 100%
38% 100% 6%
100% 100% 17%
81% 67% 100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 5%
100%
8%
95%
90%
0% 4% 85%
17% 0%
7 8 9
1 2 3
4 6
CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild
300ft
100ft
TRUCK ROUTE
100% 92%
100% 68% 100%
100% 93%
100% 90%
100% 100% 100% 100%
100% 100% 62%
100% 90%
Fyfanon
40 15
TICK
SURVEILLANCE
The District monitors tick
abundance and tick-borne
pathogens within their
populations. The western black
legged tick (Ixodes pacificus)
vectors Borrelia burgdorferi and
Borrelia miyamotoi which can
cause Lyme disease and relapsing
fever in humans. These ticks
are sampled regularly between
October and March for these
pathogens.
Ticks are collected from the
environment using a one-by-one
meter cloth attached to a dowel,
colloquially called a tick ‘flag’ due
to this construction. The cloth is
dragged over microhabitats where
ticks are likely to be, such as leaf
litter and vegetation along trails.
The flag picks up the ticks much
like a passing animal would. From
there, ticks are processed in the
District lab and submitted for
testing.
0.00 2.00
4.00 6.00
8.00 10.00
12.00 14.00
16.00 October November December January February March
2020-2022 Ticks per Hour vs Seasonal Average*
*23 Sites -- Mean Count November 2009 - March 2021
1,258
TICKS
TESTED
8 POSITIVE
SAMPLES
281
TICK
SAMPLES
TESTED
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 October November December January February March
2020-2022 Ticks per Hour vs Seasonal Average*
2020-2021
2021-2022
Mean
*23 Sites -- Mean Count November 2009 - March 2021
16 41
Month of Collection Date
0K
1K
2K
3K
4K
5K
6K
7K
8K
9K
10K
11K
12K
13K
14K
15K
16K
17K
18K
Num Count
Mosquitoes by week (total collected/all trap types)
Specie
Aedes aegypt
Aedes albopic
Aedes sierren
Aedes spp.
Anopheles sp
Coquillettidia
Culex pipiens
Culex spp.
Culex tarsalis
Culiseta spp.
January February March April May June July August September October November December Month of Collection DateSpecies
Aedes aegypti
Aedes albopictus
Aedes sierrensis
Aedes spp.
Anopheles spp.
Coquillettidia perturbans
Culex pipiens
Culex spp.
Culex tarsalis
Culiseta spp.
MOSQUITO
SURVEILLANCE
ADULT MOSQUITO
SURVEILLANCE
Adult surveillance is achieved by
utilizing a variety of mosquito
traps at dozens of different
locations throughout the district.
Staff identify every mosquito
captured to sex and species to
gain insight into the abundance
and composition of the mosquito
population throughout the district.
Each collection is a snapshot of
the mosquito population, and
together the collections show how
the population changes over time.
LARVAL MOSQUITO
SURVEILLANCE
Larval or immature mosquito
surveillance is always a precursor
to treatment of the source to
eliminate the mosquitoes before
they can cause harm. Immature
mosquitoes can develop in an
astonishing variety of natural
and artificial water sources. As
such, technicians must both
inspect sources which habitually
hold water and hunt for new or
temporary sources that contain
mosquitoes. This equates to
hundreds, even thousands of
individual inspections performed
by each technician each year.
Reducing mosquito populations
in their immature stages before
they emerge as adults allows
the District to be more efficient
and effective in our control
interventions. This control reduces
mosquito bites and prevents
human disease. Additionally, this
allows the technician to choose
from a greater variety of treatment
options from our Integrated Vector
Management toolbox. In 2022,
technicians made inspections to
over 19,000 potential mosquito
breeding habitats; of those, almost
3,500 sources were treated for
mosquito breeding.
Nuisance mosquito situations can
arise any time of year. Treehole
mosquitoes (Aedes sierrensis)
emerge between March and
June, vexing residents with their
abundance and persistent biting
behavior. This species drives
the majority of all requests for
service received by the District.
As the summer progresses,
large populations of Culex spp
mosquitoes emerge increasing the
risk for West Nile virus.
Invasive Aedes aegypti and Aedes
albopictus are also detected in
mid-summer and continue to be
found through early fall.
42 17
The District utilized
three flocks of eight sentinel
chickens each to monitor virus
transmission this year. The
sentinel chickens are confined
to their locations and blood
samples are tested twice
monthly for this purpose. This
arrangement yields a more
precise understanding of when
and where transmission occurs.
Three sentinel chickens became
infected during the surveillance
period in 2022; all positive
chickens were located in the
southern area of the District
boundaries.
Wild birds and mosquitoes
maintain West Nile virus in the
environment, passing it from
infected bird to mosquito to a
new bird in a cycle that ensures
the virus persists in the bird
population. The District monitors
this cycle to evaluate the risk
of transmission to humans.
Mosquito samples, dead birds
and sentinel chickens can all
be sampled for the presence
of West Nile and other viruses.
A positive detection in any of
these can indicate elevated
risk to the public and prompt
enhanced surveillance and
control in the area.
In 2022, the District tested
15,891 mosquitoes, submitting
582 samples for mosquito-borne
diseases. These were collected
from six different trap types
between March 8th and Oct
27th. The 582 mosquito samples
suitable for virus testing were
collected from 66 different sites
within the District’s service area.
There were 39 samples which
were positive for West Nile
virus sourced from 16 unique
locations. The earliest detection
was from a sample gathered
on June 28th and the last
September 26th.
MOSQUITO TRAP
SURVEILLANCE
POSITIVE 3 CHICKENS
Bird species react differently
to infection. Some do not
experience any poor health
effects, such as our sentinel
chickens, while others will
succumb to the virus. West
Nile virus is especially lethal
to Corvids such as crows
and magpies. Residents can
report recently dead Corvids
found around their homes and
neighborhoods. District staff
retrieve and take a sample from
the bird which is then sent to
a regional lab for testing. The
California Dead Bird Hotline
received 28 reports of dead
birds within the District’s service
area. Six of these reports were
suitable for West Nile virus
testing and one western scrub
jay collected August 28th was
positive for West Nile virus.
1 POSITIVE
DEAD BIRD
DEAD BIRD
SURVEILLANCE SENTINEL
CHICKEN
SURVEILLANCE
LOCAL
DISEASE
SURVEILLANCE
Surveillance
How is disease
detected?
18 43
15,891
MOSQUITOES TESTED
39 POSITIVE
SAMPLES
582
MOSQUITOES SAMPLES
TESTED
© 2022 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Fm mosq heat map (2)
Specie
Cu
Cu
Numbe
Map based on average of Longitude and average of Latitude. For marks layer Latitude: Color shows Females caught per trap night. Details are shown for Site Name and Site Code. For marks layer Latitude (2): Color shows details about Species. Size shows sum of Number of Records. Details are shown for Site Name and Collection Date Year. The data is filtered on Collection Date Year, Sex Condition, Trap Type, Test Status and Species. The Collection Date Year filter keeps 2022. The Sex Condition filter keeps Null, females - gravid and females - mixed. The Trap Type filter keeps CO2 and GRVD. The Test Status filter keeps Confirmed. The Species filter keeps Culex erythrothorax, Culex pipiens, Culex stigmatosoma, Culex tarsalis and Culex thriambus. The view is filtered on Females caught per trap night and Collection Date Year. The Females caught per trap night filter includes everything. The Collection Date Year filter keeps 2022.
Heatmap showing the number of mosquitoes trapped in red, layered with map of positive sample by species in blue and green. © 2022 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Fm mosq heat map (2)
Species
Culex pipiens
Culex tarsalis
Number of Records
1 4
Map based on average of Longitude and average of Latitude. For marks layer Latitude: Color shows Females caught per trap night. Details are shown for Site Name and Site Code. For marks layer Latitude (2): Color shows details about Species. Size shows sum of Number of Records. Details are shown for Site Name and Collection Date Year. The data is filtered on Collection Date Year, Sex Condition, Trap Type, Test Status and Species. The Collection Date Year filter keeps 2022. The Sex Condition filter keeps Null, females - gravid and females - mixed. The Trap Type filter keeps CO2 and GRVD. The Test Status filter keeps Confirmed. The Species filter keeps Culex erythrothorax, Culex pipiens, Culex stigmatosoma, Culex tarsalis and Culex thriambus. The view is filtered on Females caught per trap night and Collection Date Year. The Females caught per trap night filter includes everything. The Collection Date Year filter keeps 2022. 44 19
INVASIVE
MOSQUITOES
Invasive Aedes mosquitoes
have continued to expand their
distribution across the District
in 2022. As we settle into the
reality that Aedes aegypti and
Aedes albopictus mosquitoes are
a permanent part of our local
ecosystem, ongoing surveillance
and treatment continue. Currently,
the viruses transmitted by these
mosquitoes such as dengue fever,
chikungunya and Zika were not
reported in our District for 2022.
As we continue to collect data
on our local invasive Aedes
mosquitoes, we’re better able to
tailor and refine our surveillance
and control program. Traps
designed to target invasive
Aedes mosquitoes are deployed
throughout the district on a weekly
basis. Our wide array of control
options include deployment of
autodissemination ovitraps, the
application of larval control product
through our wide area larviciding
(WALS) technology, as well as Ultra
Low Volume (ULV) fogging.
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Invasive Aedes Collections
Map based on average of Longitude and average of Latitude. Color shows details about Collection Date Year. Size shows sum of Num Count. Details are shown for Sit Num Count
1 50
100
150
179
Year of Collection Date
2022
2021
2020
Adult Invasive Mosquitoes Found
By Year
Collection Date / Month of Collection Date
2020 2021 2022
August
2020
September
2020
October
2020
November
2020
June 2021 July 2021 August
2021
September
2021
October
2021
November
2021
June 2022 July 2022 August
2022
September
2022
October
2022
November
2022
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
Num Count
Trap Type
BGGAT
BGPRO-SENT
BGSENT
CDCAGO
CO2
GRVD
REST
SWEEPNET
Sum of Num Count for each Collection Date Month broken down by Collection Date Year. Color shows details about Trap Type. The data is filtered on Species, which keeps Aedes aegypti. The view is filtered on Collection Date Year, which keeps 2020, 2021 and 2022.
OctoberNovember
Trap Type
BGGAT
BGPRO-SENT
BGSENT
CDCAGO
CO2
GRVD
REST
SWEEPNET
Adult Invasive Mosquitoes Found By Trap Type
Ae.albopictu
In 2022, detections occurred s
from Lake Blvd. in Redding to Ox
Yoke Rd. in Anderson and were
exclusively to the west of
Interstate 5.
Ae. aegypt
Staff placing an autodissemination
ovitrap in a resident’s yard
20 45
STATE-WIDE
DISEASE
SURVEILLANCE
St. Louis encephalitis virus
West Nile virus
Other Mosquito-borne Diseases
Most mosquito districts throughout
California utilize a statewide
database to collect, store and
analyze vector population and West
Nile virus data. In 2022, all disease
indicators except positive dead
birds and positive counties showed
a noticeable increase over 2021.
Notably, almost 30% more positive
mosquito samples were collected.
This is likely attributed to the
theory that in years that are
warmer and drier, we often
see an increase in West
Nile virus activity.
Matching the increase in West
Nile virus, St. Louis encephalitis
virus (SLEV) also saw an increase
in mosquito samples with a 71%
increase in positive samples.
These positives were relegated to
Southern California and Central
California. SLEV was detected in
2015 after several years without
any detection of virus. Since
its reemergence, it has been
isolated at relatively low levels in
mosquitoes.
Some mosquito-borne illnesses
that have been historically recorded
in California, such as western
equine encephalomyelitis virus
(WEEV) and malaria, are reported
and monitored by the California
Department of Public Health
(CDPH). Other emerging vectorborne viruses, such as dengue, Zika, chikungunya and yellow fever,
which could become emerging
disease issues in the future are
also tracked by CDPH. Although
we experience occasional travel
associated cases of these diseases
in California, no evidence of local
transmission was detected in 2022.
Total WNV+ Mosquito Samples in
California 2022
West Nile Virus Activity in
California Counties 2022
Year-to-date
Some Larval Sources Where
Invasive Mosquitoes Were Found
46 21
OUTREACH &
PUBLIC EDUCATION
As a key pillar in the District’s
Integrated Vector Management
approach, the District’s outreach
and public education efforts have
continued to develop, and this
year is no exception. To improve
awareness, we continue to
maintain and update our deviceresponsive District website and social media platforms, to reach our
community on a digital level. Our
seasonally designated local radio
and television PSAs continued to
roll this year, including spots geotargeted through OTT (Over-thetop) media streaming services to air our video PSAs via Roku, Amazon
Fire TV, Samsung TV, and other
streaming services.
In addition to digital outreach,
we also participated in several
community events, providing
informational booths manned
by our District staff, where we
distributed a wide variety of
educational materials. These events
also provide opportunities for
our constituents to have one-onone conversations with staff and learn about our District programs.
Some community events, such
as the STEM Career Fair, was
both a virtual format as well as
an in-person event at the Shasta
Fairgrounds. District staff produced
a STEM Career themed video and
participated in the live event with a
booth. Students got the experience
of exploring the District’s Argo
amphibious vehicle.
A member of the public wearing one of our 3D printed headbands with glowstick antennae at the Lighting of the Bridge event while the sun sets over the Sacramento River.
A puppy as a mosquito
larva about to be eaten by a
mosquitofish at our outreach
booth at the Palo Cedro
Honeybee Festival.
Our Argo amphibious vehicle
interactive display at the STEM
Career Fair 2022.
Our mascot, Missy Keeto, at a
National Night Out event
with members of the Redding
Fire Department present.
This year also marked the first
annual Lighting of the Bridge
event held at the Sundial Bridge in
Redding, where we had an event
for California Mosquito Awareness
Week and lit the bridge green!
Additional pictures can be found
on the cover and table of contents
pages. Big thanks to the Shasta
Public Libraries for partnering
with us on that event to share
our programs and engage with
residents.
22 47
FINANCIAL REPORT
Statement of Financial Position:
FY 2021-2022 (June 30, 2022)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $3,262,576
Due from other governments 5,954
Inventories 163,939
Non-depreciable capital assets 51,273
Depreciable capital assets, net 1,060,335
TOTAL ASSETS $4,544,077
Long-Term Liabilities
Note payable $107,979
Net pension liability 1,489,948
OPEB 15,518
Compensated Absences 117,693
TOTAL LIABILITIES $1,731,138
2021-2022 REVENUES
Property Taxes 1,639,614 50.91%
Assessments 1,562,854 48.52%
Interest & Miscellaneous 18,421 0.57%
TOTAL REVENUE 3,220,889 100%
2021-2022 EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 2,239,617 77.47%
Service and Supplies 604,473 20.91%
Utility Expense 46,907 1.62%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,890,997 100%
The Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District
depends on property tax revenues and benefit
assessments to fund its operations. The District’s
objective is to be fiscally responsible in accordance
with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP), Governmental Accounting, Auditing and
Financial Reporting (GAAFR), as well as State
Controller reporting guidelines.
During the year, the District successfully used a
cloud-based system for many aspects of day-to-day
operations. This gives us the flexibility of working
remotely, without impeding business practices. As a
District we are always committed to the responsible
management of public funds. We continue to utilize
a transparent approach in our finances as well as all
aspects of District operations. We continue to have
successful filings of clean annual audits.
Staff is currently working on a Capital Improvements
Plan which will take us into the next 5 years. In the
past this was a successful experience and will continue to support planning for the future growth of the
district.
Property Taxes
51%
Assessments
48%
Other Revenues
1%
Property Taxes
Assessments
Other Revenues
REVENUES
Salaries and
Benefits
77%
Service and
Supplies
21%
Utility Expense
2%
Salaries and
Benefits
Service and
Supplies
Utility Expense
EXPENDITURES
48 23
And that about covers it.
19200 Latona Road, Anderson, CA 96007
P: 530-365-3768 F: 530-365-0305
www.shastamosquito.org
Thank you
to John Albright
who shared over 25 years
of his career dedicating himself
to Shasta MVCD residents.
John loved to teach, learn,
and innovate - a set of values
our agency holds dear.
Happy retirement,
John!
49 MEETING OF THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
HELD TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2023, AT THE
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 4488 RED BLUFF ST, SHASTA LAKE, CALIFORNIA
66:00 PM CALL TO ORDER - Regular Session
Mayor Watkins convened the regular meeting at 6:00 PM
Council Members present: Eisenbeisz, Jones, Morgan, Powell, Watkins Council Members absent: None
Pledge & invocation
AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS
Proclamation declaring October 3, 2023, National Night Out 2023.
PRESENTATIONS
John Andoh, Transit General Manager of Redding Area Bus Authority (RABA) Presentation.
COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, AND OUTSIDE AGENCY REPORTS
Ann Morningstar – reported on Shasta Lake Fire Protection District activity and the refurbishing of the 911 monument.
Public Comment:
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Resolution CC-2023-60 attesting to the veracity of the submission of the Power Source Disclosure Report and the Power Content Label for calendar year 2022.
2. Resolution CC-2023-61 to declare ERS Industrial Services Inc. the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, award a construction contract in the amount of $31,100.00 to ERS Industrial Services Inc. for the construction of the WTP Filter No. 2 Rehabilitation Project, and approve a total expenditure for construction not to exceed $40,000.00.
3. Information Item – Checks, E-Payments, and Wires: Checks, Wires, E-payments:
8/17/2023 $344,300.35
8/24/2023 $1,218,477.03
Payroll: 9/8/2023 $196,374.31
Motion/Vote:
By motion made/seconded (Morgan/Eisenbeisz), and carried, the consent agenda was approved.
50 PUBLIC HEARINGS None
REGULAR AGENDA
4. Discussion and possible action on a Resolution directing the City Manager to commence the Comprehensive Update of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances of the City to implement the 2040 General Plan.
Motion/Vote: By motion made/seconded (Eisenbeisz/Morgan), and carried, Resolution CC2023-63 was approved.
5. Discussion and possible action on a Resolution to rescind the use of the City of Redding Construction Standards and Construction Standard Exceptions and adopt the updated City of Shasta Lake Construction Standards. (Page 36) Construction Standards are online at the link listed in the staff report.
Motion/Vote:
By motion made/seconded (Jones/Eisenbeisz), and carried, Resolution CC-2023-64 was approved.
6. Discussion and possible action on a Resolution approving the Multifamily Solar Program.
Motion/Vote:
By motion made/seconded (Eisenbeisz/Jones), and carried, Resolution CC-2023-65 was approved.
7. Discussion and possible direction on Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission Stipend Compensation Rates.
Motion/Vote:
Direction was provided to have staff bring back a proposal after researching local jurisdictions practices.
COMMUNICATIONS
Staff Comments
Jessaca Lugo, City Manager – Discussion and direction regarding cancellation of the October 3, 2023, meeting due to National Night Out Event.
City Council Comments
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business, Mayor Watkins adjourned the meeting at 8:30 pm. _____________________________
TONI M. COATES, CMC, City Clerk
51 Report and Recommendations 2 Reviewed and Approved
City Manager
AGENDA ITEM
City Council
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Will Bond, City Engineer/Public Works Director
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: Authorization to file a Notice of Completion
Street Improvements 2023 – Bid No. 2023-12
FILE NO.: New
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests that the City Council consider accepting the Street Improvements 2023 project as complete and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion.
BACKGROUND:
On May 16, 2023, the City Council approved resolution CC-2023-35 authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. for the purposes of performing the above project.
Staff has determined that the work specified in the contract has been completed and is in substantial conformance with the Plans and Specifications. Therefore, staff recommends that the Council accept the Project and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion at the Shasta County Recorder’s Office.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
Awarded construction contract: $ 1,151,542.00
Approved expenditure not to exceed: $ 1,275,000.00
Total project construction cost: $ 1,192,882.64
This project was funded through budgeted SB1 RMRA and Gas Tax funds.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
DISTRIBUTION:
City Council
52 RESOLUTION CC 2023-xx
________________________________________________________________________________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE CITY COUNCIL TO ACCEPT THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2023 PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the City entered into a contract with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. for the performance of the Street Improvements 2023 project (Bid No. 2023-12); and WHEREAS, J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. has completed the project to the satisfaction of City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Shasta Lake City Council hereby accepts the Street Improvements 2023 project as complete and authorizes staff to file a Notice of Completion with the Shasta County Recorder’s Office.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
GREG WATKINS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
TONI M. COATES, CMC
City Clerk
53 Report and Recommendations 3 Reviewed and Approved
City Manager
AGENDA ITEM
City Council
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Shelby Millingar, Associate Civil Engineer
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: Authorization to file a Notice of Completion
FILE NO.: Ranchera Rd. Water Main Replacement Project – Bid No. 2023-05 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests that the City Council consider accepting the project as complete and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion (NOC) for the Ranchera Rd. Water Main Replacement Project – Bid No. 2023-05.
BACKGROUND:
On April 18, 2023, the City Council approved resolution CC-2023-17 authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract with Sunrise Excavating for the purposes of performing the above project.
Staff has determined that the work specified in the contract has been completed and is in substantial conformance with the Plans and Specifications. Therefore, staff recommends that the Council accept the Project and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion at the Shasta County Recorder’s Office.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
Awarded construction contract: $ 1,814,227.20
Approved expenditure not to exceed: $ 2,177,072.64
Total project construction cost: $ 1,858,704.80
This project is funded through currently budgeted water utility funds (510-340-6237) and trafficway funds (250-340).
54 ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
DISTRIBUTION:
City Council
55 RESOLUTION CC 2023-xx
__________________________________________________________________________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE CITY COUNCIL TO ACCEPT THE RANCHERA RD. WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
__________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the City entered into a contract with Sunrise Excavating for the performance of the Ranchera Rd. Water Main Replacement Project; and
WHEREAS,
Sunrise Excavating has completed the project to the satisfaction of City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Shasta Lake City Council hereby accepts the Ranchera Rd. Water Main Replacement Project (2023-05) as complete and authorizes staff to file a Notice of Completion with the Shasta County Recorder’s Office.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
GREG WATKINS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
TONI M. COATES, CMC
City Clerk
56 Report and Recommendations 4
Reviewed and Approved
City Manager
AGENDA ITEM
City Council
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Shelby Millingar, Associate Civil Engineer
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: Contract Award
Commercial Center Safe Routes to School Engineering & Planning Services
FILE NO.: New
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests that the City Council consider a supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $510,000.00, awarding the Commercial Center Safe Routes to School Engineering & Planning Professional Services Agreement contract to Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. (SDS) of Redding, CA in the amount of $489,810.00 and approve a contract contingency of $20,190.00 for a total of $510,000.00.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Shasta Lake, and partners; K2 Development (K2), Redding Rancheria and Community Revitalization & Development Corporation (CRDC) prepared and submitted a proposal to the AHSC Program in June 2021 and was notified in February 2022 that the necessary funding for an affordable housing project had been awarded. This project is a component of the AHSC program award.
The project site surrounds the approximately 11-acre commercial center property owned by the Redding Rancheria and its subsidiary; Win-River Hotel Corporation (WRHCO) and is located on Cascade Blvd. approximately 500’ west of the Interstate 5 interchange with Shasta Dam Blvd. (State Route 151).
The project is a complete streets, active transportation, and urban greening infrastructure project. The project will create better active transportation mobility, including closing several pedestrian gaps along Grand Ave, Shasta Way, Shasta Dam Blvd, and Cascade 57 Blvd and will serve the needs of all transportation users including pedestrians, bicyclists, people with disabilities, transit riders, and motorists. Additionally, the project will construct a portion of the planned Wonderland Blvd.
The goals of the project are:
• Make it safer and easier for school children to walk, bicycle, carpool, and/or utilize transit as means of traveling to school or school related activities • Provide safe facilities for all transportation users – pedestrians, bicyclists, people with disabilities, transit users, and motorists
• Decrease traffic congestion around Grand Oaks School by reducing school-related travel emissions, and improving the health, well-being, and safety of students and residents
• Make walking and bicycling safer, more comfortable, and more convenient • Create a natural recreation space to increase opportunities for physical activity and utilize the natural infrastructure of the site in conjunction with green sustainable stormwater infrastructure to maximize stormwater capture and minimize pollution In general, the project improvements include:
• Construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, utilities, drainage infrastructure and lighting improvements to:
o 700± linear feet; Grand Avenue from Shasta Way to Wonderland Blvd o 850± linear feet; Shasta Way from Grand Avenue to Shasta Dam Blvd o 600± linear feet; Cascade Blvd. from Shasta Dam Blvd. to Wonderland Blvd
o 200± linear feet; Shasta Dam Blvd (SR-151) from Shasta way east towards Cascade Blvd
• Construction of 600± linear feet of new Wonderland Blvd. from Cascade Blvd. to Grand Avenue including:
o Street section consistent with an 84-ft right of way per City of Shasta Lake Construction Standards (COSLCS) including landscaped medians. o Complete street design components
o Utility design & coordination (water, wastewater, stormwater, joint utility trench & irrigation)
o Safe crossing infrastructure from Commercial Center site to open space (across Wonderland Blvd.)
• A 2-acre open space adjacent to Moody Creek with the following improvements:
o 1600± linear feet of improved trails
o Pedestrian lighting, seating, picnic benches, a shade structure, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, signage, and a bike rack
o Enhanced water-wise landscaping and shade tree planting consistent with existing and native flora
o Green sustainable stormwater infrastructure including bioretention and bioswales
58 SELECTION PROCESS
On July 10, 2023 a formal RFQ&P outlining the scope of the project was advertised on ciplist.com and on the City’s website. Proposals were required to include services fees for the entire scope of services in a separate envelope to be opened after the proposal ranking and interview process. On August 25, 2023 the proposal period closed with the City receiving one proposal.
Although only one proposal was received, a review and selection committee was formed with City staff members from the Planning and Public Works departments. Upon completion of the review process, the committee found that SDS possessed the necessary technical expertise that would allow the project to be completed successfully.
Staff then reviewed the scope of work and fee submitted with the proposal. Staff worked with SDS to modify their submitted scope and fee based on discussion of various project details. The attached scope of work and fee of $489,810.00 is satisfactory given the project and the coordination efforts with numerous agencies.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
This project is 100% funded on a reimbursable basis through the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities grant, so there will be no fiscal impact to the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
Location Map, Draft Layout Plan, Scope of Work and Fee, SDS DISTRIBUTION:
City Council
59 RESOLUTION CC 2023-xx
__________________________________________________________________________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $510,000.00 TO
AWARD THE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO SDS, INC.
OF REDDING, CA IN THE AMOUNT OF $489,810.00 WITH $20,190.00 TO ALLOW FOR A CONTRACT CONTINGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City and partners applied for and received an Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Grant; and
WHEREAS, a portion of the grant proceeds are for the Commercial Center Safe Routes to School project; and,
WHEREAS, the City has issued a Request for Qualifications and Proposals, received and reviewed said proposal, selected the most qualified firm to provide professional services for the project, and negotiated an acceptable scope of work and fee for said services.
WHERAS, funding for this project is currently not allocated in the 2022-2024 Two-Year Budget.
WHEREAS, this project is funded from the following capital project fund:
Expenditure Account: 270-340-6271 - $510,000.00
Revenue Account: 270-000-4347 - $510,000.00
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. The City Council of the City of Shasta Lake hereby approves a supplemental budget request in the amount of $510,00.00 to be used for the engineering and planning services for the Commercial Center Safe Routes to School project.
2. The City of Shasta Lake City Council authorizes staff to enter into a professional services agreement contract with SDS of Redding, CA for professional services related to the Commercial Center Safe Routes to School project in the amount of $489,810.00 and approve a total of $510,000.00 to allow for a contract contingency of $20,190.00.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October 2023 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
60 GREG WATKINS, Mayor
ATTEST:
TONI M. COATES, CMC
City Clerk
61 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! !
! ! ! !
5 Grand Oaks
Elementary School
CASCADE BLVD
GRAND AVE
NELL ORR ST
SHASTA ST
KENNETT ST
SHASTA DAM BLVD
MAIN ST
BUENA VISTA ST
FORT PECK ST
CASCADE BLVD
SHASTA WAY
FRONT ST
PROJECT AREA
CITY LIMIT
I MAP PRODUCED:
OCTOBER 6, 2023
0 100 200
Feet
LOCATION MAP
COMMERCIAL CENTER
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT
P:\\GIS\Engineering\MapDoc\CommercialCenter_LocMap.mxd
!"^$
62 No. Revisions Date By App.
Designed By:Drawn By:Checked By:
Sheet of
Date:
Scale:CITY OF SHASTA LAKE
Public Works Department
4477 Main Street, Shasta Lake, CA 96019
(530) 275-7400 ph (530) 275-7462 fax
DO NOT COPY
These Plans may not be reproduced unless they are
original copies signed in ink by the Engineer. The Engineer preparing these Plans will not be responsible or liable for unauthorized changes or uses of these Plans. All changes to the Plans must be in writing and must be approved by the Engineer. 7/12/22
WSB
JL
WSB
Approved:City Engineer
1"=40'
LAYOUT PLAN SCALE: 1" = 50'
Shasta Lake Downtown
Revitalization Project
AHSC-Commercial Center SR2S
Layout Plan (Conceptual)
LAYOUT NOTES:
1. Dimensions, property lines, utilities and all other
existing features shown on plans are approximate.
2. This plan is intended to be conceptual.
(E) 50'± R/W
(N) 84' R/W (E) 80'± R/W
(N) 60' R/W (E) 50'± R/W
(N) 80'± R/W
PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY
63 SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
GENERAL
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. is taking the lead on this project due to their lengthy history with this location.
SDS has been involved with three attempts to develop this property and is very familiar with the property and its past. In addition, we have been working on the Mountain Gate at Shasta project north of the commercial center for the past 20 years. The alignment of Wonderland Boulevard was designed by SDS working with the Mountain Gate developers. GHD will be a key collaborator and will be responsible for traffic studies, assistance with developing urban design and complete street concepts, landscape and irrigation design and PS&Es, street lighting design and PS&Es and quality control and peer review services. Gallaway Enterprises also has history with this project site. They prepared the draft wetlands delineation and biological reports utilized in RREDCO’s commercial center planning process.
Project management responsibilities shall include, but not be limited to:
• Utilization of the City’s Virtual Project Manager (VPM) web-based program for all project-related activities
• Coordination of all meetings and preparation of all agendas and minutes.
This scope assumes monthly meetings from the start of work through approval of PS&Es; and assumes monthly meetings during construction for a total of 45 meetings. • Coordination and consultation as needed with all development partners, appropriate utilities, and local, State, and Federal regulatory agencies.
This scope assumes six meetings for coordination with development partners, utilities, and local, state, and federal regulatory agencies. In addition to these, SDS has a standing weekly update meeting with K2 Development, under a separate agreement, where this project will be followed. • Coordination and assistance as needed with AHSC program guidelines, documentation, and submittals. (This is included in the 45 meetings outlined above) • Preparation of schedules and monthly schedule updates • Preparation and submittal of monthly progress reports with monthly progress payment requests.
The monthly progress report shall Include:
þ An overview of work accomplished during the previous month þ A description of current key activities and an updated schedule for each task and subtask þ A list of problem areas, if any, and proposed corrective actions þ A list of tasks for the following month; and
þ A schedule summary indicating whether the project Is on schedule and any schedule concerns or critical path items (a recovery plan/schedule shall be prepared for any activities that fall more than 2 weeks behind schedule)
This scope assumes 12 reports during PS&E and 2 reports during the construction period. 6 64
SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
TASK 1 DELIVERABLES
TASK 1 FEE: $105,444
TASK 2: PRELIMINARY DESIGN & DATA COLLECTION
Provide preliminary design and data collection for the work outlined in the project description.
Coordination with the project team, WRHCO’s project team and City staff is required to achieve a mutually agreeable concept integrating open space, complete streets and WRHCO commercial center’s development vision.
Provide the following preliminary engineering design services including, but not limited to, the following items:
Task 2A - Data Collection & Field Survey
Conduct all data collection, field surveys and other information necessary to establish horizontal and vertical control, utility locations, right-of-way limits, and property boundaries. This shall include, but may not be limited to, the following:
• Boundary, topographic and control surveys to establish elements required for plan preparation and construction (record of survey or other map filing may be necessary to establish property lines and existing right of way)
• Preparation and adherence to the approved Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program.
For consistency for Caltrans and the City, GHD will prepare the draft QA/QC program for SDS. SDS will provide names and contact information for GHD’s use. SDS will submit the QA/QC Program to the City.
GHD will support SDS for design presentation, pay items and special provisions to meet the requirements of the City and Caltrans. GHD will review all SDS plans prior to submittal to City of Shasta Lake. • Maintenance of project files.
• Preparation and conduct of presentations to WRHCO, City Council, City management and/or the public and preparation of presentation materials at the request of the City. Two (2) presentations are anticipated for this project.
• Minutes of all meetings
• Schedules and schedule updates
• Monthly progress reports with monthly progress payment requests The Project Manager shall play an active role in the management and coordination of the project, including coordinating regular meetings with City staff to discuss project status, problems, budgeting, and other areas that impact the work.
Mike Dormer will function as the Principal-in-Charge and will reach out to other responsible personnel as needed. GHD will assist with design presentations.
7 65
SCOPE OF WORK
• Positive utility location information
• Review of existing record/as-built drawings and mapping • Environmental, geotechnical or any other pertinent document review • Review of the Geotechnical Engineering Report(s), see below for description.
We are aware that much of the site once contained residential homes and utilities. SDS has been involved with work on this property for various projects for the past 25 years, and served as part of a development team for one of those projects. SDS is extremely familiar with this property as well as the unrelated large project to the north.
The basis of bearings shall adhere to the same coordinate system and datums found in the City’s Horizontal and Vertical Control Network located here: https://cityofshastalake.org/1105/Documents.
Task 2A-1: Delineation of Aquatic Resources (removed)
Task 2A-2: Biological Resource Assessment (BRA)
Gallaway Enterprises will prepare a Biological Resource Assessment for the site. Gallaway Enterprises will conduct biological surveys per California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), California Native Plant Society (CNPS), and all other appropriate protocols in order to identify the existing biological conditions.
During the field survey, Gallaway Enterprises will make a determination regarding presence/absence of suitable habitat for special-status species based on habitats observed. Gallaway will document all plant species observed on-site and will report any sensitive species to the Client. If any state or federally listed plant or wildlife species are identified the location will be mapped.
While it is not expected that state or federally listed plant or wildlife species are present at the project site, if they are, Gallaway Enterprises will provide guidance and re-scope for additional reporting and permit requirements, as necessary. For the purposes of this survey, special-status species are those that fall into one of the following categories:
• Listed as threatened or endangered, or are proposed or candidates for listing under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA, 14 California Code of Regulations 670.5) or the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA, 50 Code of Federal Regulations 17.12); • Listed as a Species of Special Concern (SSC) by CDFW or protected under the California Fish and Game Code (CFGC) (i.e., Fully Protected species);
• Ranked by the CNPS as 1A, 1B, or 2;
• Protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA); • Protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act; or • Species that are otherwise protected under policies or ordinances at the local or regional level as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, §15380).
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
8 66
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 2A-3: Cultural Resource Assessment
Gallaway Enterprises will contract with Genesis Society to conduct a cultural resource study within the project site to meet the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) will require compliance with federal and state regulations related to the identification and preservation of historical and cultural resources. Gallaway’s sub-contractor will conduct the following:
• Conduct Records Search at Northeast Information Center (NEIC). • Consultation with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for Sacred Lands, and parties listed by the NAHC.
• Pedestrian field survey, complete coverage, intensive-level for c. 11-acre APE. • Prepare site forms for newly identified sites. Present scope does not include evaluation of sub-surface components of prehistoric or historic-era sites, or recovery of any surface occurring artifacts. • Prepare cultural resources inventory report per CEQA and NHPA Section 106. • Transmittal of final inventory survey report to NEIC/client.
TASK 2A DELIVERABLES: One copy of each report in PDF format delivered electronically Task 2B: Preliminary Engineering
Preliminary engineering design services shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
• Preparation of all preliminary hydrological studies and reports to compliment Task 3 (Environmental).
Preliminary hydrologic and hydraulic studies will include pre- and post-development run-off and mitigation measures within the open space area for water quantity mitigation. The open space area will also include bio-swales to mitigate post construction storm water quality impacts. • Preparation of preliminary complete streets and landscaping layout.
SDS and GHD will team to propose alternatives for components of complete streets and landscaping to provide a safe experience for pedestrians and bicyclists in this area. For consistency for Caltrans and the City, GHD will consult with SDS for complete street elements, planting and lighting. In coordination with SDS, GHD will prepare draft exhibits for urban design components that will be used by SDS to secure approvals from the Rancheria, City and Caltrans. Preliminary planting plans will be prepared by SDS and reviewed by GHD for the area between the curbs and sidewalks plus small areas in the vicinity of curb returns. With the exception of all curb returns, the areas on the private side of sidewalks will not be landscaped.
The scope assumes preliminary engineering submittals will be prepared by SDS with ‘subject matter expert’ (SME) reviews and consultations by GHD.
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
9 67
SCOPE OF WORK
• Identification of all utility conflicts & relocation requirements and coordination with the responsible utility. Coordination with WRHCO’s Architect/Engineer to ensure proper sizing of utilities. The utilities include, but are not limited to: PG&E (gas), City of Shasta Lake Electric (electric), City of Shasta Lake Public Works (water, wastewater, stormwater), AT&T (telephone), and Spectrum (cable TV). • Completion of preliminary design calculations, preliminary utility design, preliminary plan preparation, preliminary engineer’s cost estimate, and all other appropriate preliminary engineering work
• Preparation of a preliminary environmental review and identification of areas of potential environmental impact and potential permit requirements. • Preparation of a preliminary right-of-way assessment, right of way dedication needs and identification of any potential right-of-way issues.
SDS past work on the RREDCO Commercial Development including existing utility research and cooperation with RREDCO and their consultants will be very beneficial in determining the future utility demands, environmental constraints, right-of-way and easement needs. This scope includes minor coordination with proposed project on east side of Cascade Boulevard on APN 007-390-039. • Preliminary construction layout (30%) including plan, profile, typical sections, grading & drainage, and utilities.
• Review of the Geotechnical Engineering Report City of Shasta Lake Commercial Center prepared by Mid Pacific Engineering; dated June 28, 2018, and Supplemental Geotechnical Engineering Findings Letter dated March 31, 2020. Also, a Geotechnical Investigation Report for the Proposed Shasta Lake Shopping Center - Cascade Boulevard, dated March 21, 1996, was prepared by Kleinfelder and is available for review. It is anticipated that the report{s) are adequate for the work described in this RFQ&P. If additional geotechnical analysis is required, the City will evaluate the need and the contract may be amended.
SDS is very familiar with the findings in these geotechnical Reports. We agree that no further Geotechnical Investigation should be necessary. The reports do a good job of defining the soil conditions, including the presence of rock.
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
TASK 2B DELIVERABLES
• Supporting documentation (draft hydrology/hydraulic studies and reports, etc.) • Preliminary plans & estimates including, but not limited to: typical sections, grading, plan, profile, utilities, landscaping including complete street components, green stormwater Infrastructure {bio swale), grading & drainage and street lighting plan. This submittal should equate to a 30% design effort.
10 68
SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 2C DELIVERABLES
Task 2C: Urban Design & Landscape Architecture
For the purpose of providing a scope of services and consultant fee for this task, the following urban design and landscaping documents, studies & plans should include, but not be limited to:
• Coordination with Redding Rancheria & City staff to develop urban design concepts • Complete street design components to satisfy grant requirements • Open space design to satisfy grant requirements
• Coordination of hydrology & hydraulic needs for bio-swale and/or bio-retention infrastructure SDS and GHD will team up to prepare urban design and complete streets components for the project. • Urban Design concept and preliminary landscape & irrigation plans. This submittal should equate to a 30% design effort.
• Formal submittals shall be prepared for review (draft) and distribution (final), with drawings reduced by 50% and printed on 11” x 17” reproducible paper, and estimates printed on 8½” x 11” reproducible paper. Prior to completion of the final submittal, the project team shall respond to and incorporate, if appropriate, any comments received from the City or other interested party. • The various reports or investigation documents sets shall be submitted In Portable Document Format (.pdf). Delivery shall be either via USB flash drive or online file transfer.
TASK 3: ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND PERMITTING
Prepare and submit applications and assist the City with obtaining all required permits and environmental review documentation required by all State and local regulatory and jurisdictional agencies needed to ensure this project is cleared for construction on the anticipated dates outlined in the project schedule and that it can be successfully completed.
Environmental compliance and permitting responsibilities shall include, but shall not be limited to:
• Preparation of the appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental documents and any associated technical studies required to clear the project for construction • Coordination and consultation with all Federal, State, and local regulatory and jurisdictional agencies necessary to obtain required permits and provide environmental clearance • Preparation of all permit schedules, applications, attachments, and exhibits • Review of draft permits and preparation of responses
• Coordination of any and all public meeting preparation, planning, advertising and administration, including comment solicitation and preparation of response to comments for City review.
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
TASK 2 FEE: $97,514
11 69
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 3A: Development of Draft Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Gallaway Enterprises will prepare an administrative draft IS/MND, utilizing a City of Shasta Lake CEQA template or template as provided by the City. Conducting the environmental review of the project will result in the identification of any potentially significant environmental issues and, if necessary, include development of mitigation measures designed to reduce any potential impacts to a less-than-significant level. Though highly unlikely, the identification of substantial evidence of potentially significant unavoidable impacts will be brought to the client’s immediate attention for review and discussion.
Rescoping of the project may be required if new information is presented that results in additional analysis for the preparation of the document. After peer review of the administrative draft document by the project team, Gallaway Enterprises will incorporate comments and develop a draft document for public review.
To address construction related air quality impacts and to inform the CEQA document, Gallaway Enterprises will conduct a review of the proposed project within the CalEEMod online model using input and details about the proposed project from the design team. If necessary, based on the results of the model run, standard minimization measures may be included in the model to reduce potential emissions to a less than significant level.
Task 3B: CEQA Submittal Assistance
Gallaway Enterprises, will assist the client in complying with CEQA submittal and noticing responsibilities, including preparation of CEQA public notices required to be filed with Shasta County Clerk Recorder’s Office and California State Clearinghouse (i.e. NOC, NOD, etc.) and published in newspaper(s) in local general circulation. Payment of all fees (CEQA filing fees, County Clerk fees, CDFW fees and advertisement fees) are the responsibility of the client.
Task 3C: Response to Comments, Errata, MMRP, and Final Document Gallaway Enterprises will prepare written responses to public inquiries/input received during the IS/MND 30-day public comment period or as a result of the public hearing. This task assumes review of general public or public agencies’ CEQA comments, and preparation of corresponding written responses, as well as attendance at one (1) meeting or public hearing related to the project. After the development of responses to comments we will create an errata and mitigation monitoring program (MMRP) and final document. Filing a Notice of Completion is also a component of this task.
Task 3D: Permit Facilitation (removed)
Task 3D-1: Section 404-Nationwide Permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers (removed) Task 3D-2: Section 401 Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (removed) Task 3D-4: Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (removed)
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
12 70
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 3D-5: Response to Agency Request for Information
This task may include activities such as identifying alternative mitigation strategies, and responding to early consultation efforts with State Fish and Wildlife.
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
TASK 3 DELIVERABLES
• Environmental documentation
• Technical studies and surveys
• Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program documents (MMRP) All environmental documents shall be prepared in preliminary and final draft stages for City review, shall incorporate, if appropriate, any public, agency, and City comments made during the preliminary document review, and shall conform to the City requirements. Deliverables shall be transmitted to the City either via USB flash drive or onllne file transfer.
Identify and prepare any and all permit applications and approvals necessary from the regulatory agencies to begin construction and prepare a schedule of permits with the required timelines to ensure each permit is obtained prior to the start of construction. The City will provide payment to the agencies for the cost of permits and will obtain any appropriate City of Shasta Lake permits.
For the purpose of providing a scope of services and consultant fee for this task, the following environmental documents, studies, permits, agreements, and activities may be required:
• Initial Study
• Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Biological Resources Analysis and site surveys
• Cultural Resources Analysis and site survey
• Floodplain evaluation (hydrologic/floodway analysis) review, surveying and mapping • Drainage/Hydrology Study
SDS has mapped the FEMA floodplain on the property, which is a backwater condition starting at the box culvert under I-5. The proposed improvements will not impact the existing FEMA floodplain.
SDS routinely performs hydrology and hydraulic studies on most of our projects. SDS prepared a study for the RREDCO Commercial Center project and will use that information to develop a projectspecific analysis for this project. • Traffic Impact Technical Memo (focused on Cascade Boulevard/Shasta Dam Boulevard). Memo will also include evaluation of the new street pattern (loop) with Wonderland Blvd. • Construction-related traffic and staging impact analysis 13 71
SCOPE OF WORK
In support of the Caltrans encroachment permit and CEQA re-evaluation by the City, GHD will prepare:
• Traffic Impact Technical Memo (For Cascade Boulevard/ Shasta Dam Boulevard) - GHD will:
þ Collect AM and PM peak hour turn movement counts for weekday conditions þ Calculate weekday peak hour LOS and queues
þ Calculate 2045 “Design Year” base volumes, peak hour LOS, and queues þ Identify if any improvements are needed at the intersection for the Design Year of 2045 þ Document the above in a brief technical memo with tables þ Proposed future 7-11 store on APN 007-390-039 will be included in the traffic impact memo. • CEQA VMT Analysis for the Road Project - GHD will:
þ Prepare a qualitative analysis in the form of a technical memorandum þ The analysis will only consider the road improvements þ The analysis will conclude that there is a less than significant VMT impact due to:
» Active Transportation facilities
» Conformance with Complete Street Policies
» Reduced overall trip lengths.
• CEQA Construction-Related Traffic Impact Analysis- GHD will:
þ Prepare a qualitative analysis in the form of a page technical memorandum with suggested text for a CEQA initial study
þ The analysis will only consider the road improvements þ The analysis will seek to conclude that implementation of standard CA MUTCD and Caltrans traffic management techniques will result in a less than significant impact from construction traffic and the impact of the construction on public traffic. • Geotechnical Report - MPE report for Commercial Center, dated June 28, 2018, and Supplemental dated March 31, 2020, cover geotechnical needs for proposed project. • Grading Permit (SDS will prepare a preliminary grading and drainage plan for review by the Development Partners and for use by Gallaway for environmental permitting) • Tribal Consultation by Gallaway Enterprises
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
TASK 4: RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION / RIGHT-OF-ENTRY FOR CONSTRUCTION TASK 3 FEE: $77,390
SDS shall be responsible for coordinating, preparing, and recording all documents needed to obtain the right-of-way (ROW) dedication required to construct the project, as well as any easements, right-of-entry agreements, and encroachment permits from all private landowners and public entities that may be needed to construct the project to ensure this project is cleared for construction on the anticipated dates outlined in the project schedule and that It can be successfully completed. 14 72
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 4 Scope of Services:
Right-of-way acquisition and right-of-entry responsibilities shall Include, but not be limited to:
• Review of existing City of Shasta Lake property and easements and, in coordination with engineering design work and environmental compliance and permitting documents, determine what, if any, additional right-of-way must be obtained
• Coordination of any and all public meeting planning, advertising and administration, including comment solicitation and preparation of response to comments for City review • Coordination·, preparation, and recordation of all documents needed to obtain additional right-ofway, including, but not limited to, legal descriptions, exhibits and recordation forms • Coordination, preparation, submittal, and acquisition of construction right-of-entry agreements and encroachment permits from all private landowners and public entities as needed to allow for all construction activities
• Assume no appraisals are required since all rights of way and easements to be dedicated for roadway and utility purposes are from WRHCO
SDS has prepared and tied many of the existing rights of way along portions of the project site and will utilize our knowledge of the area in preparing existing conditions.
TASK 4 DELIVERABLES
• Final right of way documentation for each parcel, easement, and/or right of entry All right-of-way documents shall be prepared in preliminary and final draft stages for City review, shall incorporate, if appropriate, any public, agency, and City comments made during the previous draft review, and shall conform to the requirements of the City.
The Consultant shall prepare a schedule of right-of-way issues with anticipated timelines to ensure all issues are resolved prior to the start of construction. While SDS shall be responsible for incidental costs related to this task (e.g. title reports, etc.), the City shall provide all escrow services required to obtain required rights-of-way, easements, and rights-of-entry.
If the actual right-of-way requirements are different than those listed above, a modification to the design scope and associated fee for this task will be negotiated.
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
TASK 4 FEE: $26,486
15 73
SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 5: PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES (FINAL DESIGN) SERVICES Provide final engineering design services and prepare ail contract documents (construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates) needed to advertise the projects for public bid. The contract documents shall be prepared in accordance with the City of Shasta Lake Construction Standards.
Task 5 Scope of Services:
PS&E services shall Include, but not be limited to:
• Prepare all final hydrology/hydraulic studies and reports. • Complete all final floodplain engineering, surveying analysis and investigation. • Identify potential conflicts between roadway improvements and existing utilities and coordinate the development of relocation plans with the utility owner. Prepare utility plan sheets depicting existing and relocated utility locations. Coordinate with any and all utilities required to ensure horizontal and vertical conflicts are identified and resolved through design or relocations. • Complete landscape architecture & urban design efforts. • Integrate complete streets design elements with significant emphasis on non-motorized facllltles and safety.
• Coordinate with Redding Rancheria’s design team, the City and other development partners. • Determine construction sequence to demonstrate traffic handling during all construction phases. • Complete all design calculations and prepare plans, technical specifications, engineer’s cost estimates and all other appropriate engineering necessary to provide complete contract documents, ready for bidding. All designs shall comply with appropriate local design codes and guidelines. Prepare all design calculations and complete all plan preparation (60%, 90%, Final), technical specification preparation, special provision preparation, and engineer’s cost estimates, and all other appropriate architectural and engineering services necessary to provide a complete and constructable set of contract documents, ready for public bid. All design work shall comply with any and all appropriate Federal, State and local design codes and guidelines, including ADA, fire protection, and building codes.
• Apply for and secure a Caltrans Encroachment permit (if necessary). • Review final compiled PS&E set (Including City-provided front end contract specifications, general contract provisions, and proposal).
• Finalize all right-of-way dedication documents.
TASK 5 DELIVERABLES
• Supporting documentation (final hydrologic/hydraulic studies and reports, etc.) • Draft and final construction plans
• Prepare all final hydrology/hydraulic studies and reports. • Complete all final floodplain engineering, surveying analysis and investigation. • Draft and final technical specifications and attachments • Draft and final engineer’s estimate
• Additional documentation required from the environmental document. • Plats and legal descriptions and any other right-of-way dedication documents.
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
16 74
SCOPE OF WORK
• SDS and GHD will prepare the following final plans:
þ Cover Sheet
þ General Notes
þ Existing Topographic and Boundary Survey
þ Demolition Plan
þ Street Improvement Plans
þ Typical Sections
þ Intersection Details
þ Street Plan Details
þ Storm Drain Data Tables
þ Striping and Signage Plans
þ Irrigation Plans, Notes & Details
þ Planting Plans & Details
þ Electrical Notes
þ Lighting Plans
þ Lighting Details
Hardscape or amenity items, developed collaboratively in previous tasks, will be included in the SDS PS&E documents.
Formal deliverables for this task (plans, specifications and estimates) shall occur at the 60%, 90%, and 100% completion points for City and project team to review. Submittal formats shall follow the guidelines stated herein. The Consultant shall respond to, and incorporate, if appropriate, any and all comments received from the City or any other regulatory agency or utility. Delivery of all digital formats shall be either via USB flash drive or online file transfer. Formal deliverables shall Include:
• Construction Plans: Construction plan deliverables for review shall be submitted at the 60%, 90%, and 100% design stages, with drawings reduced by 50%. PDF sets shall be submitted at the review stages to allow the City and all other appropriate agencies to provide a thorough review of the project documents. 100% final construction plans shall be delivered in the following formats:
þ Portable Document Format (.PDF) file(s) of final plans complete with final signatures. þ Computed Aided Drafting files (.dwg) of all plans.
• Technical Specifications: Specifications shall be prepared utilizing Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) Masterformat 2004. Deliverables for review shall be submitted at the 90% and 100% design stages, with specifications In PDF form. 100% final specifications shall be delivered in the following formats:
þ 8 ½” x 11” hardcopy, complete with final signatures, ready for reproduction. þ Portable Document Format (.PDF) flle(s) of final specifications
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
17 75
SCOPE OF WORK
• Construction Cost Estimates: Estimates for review shall be submitted at the 60%, 90%, and 100% design stages, with estimates on 8 ½” x 11”, in PDF form. The 100% final estimate shall be delivered In the following formats:.
þ Portable Document Format (.PDF) file(s) of final estimate.
TASK 6: ASSISTANCE DURING BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION
Provide assistance to the City during the bidding and construction phases of the project to ensure the Contractor understands all technical aspects of the design.
NOTE: The City utilizes Virtual Project Manager (VPM) software and most correspondence will occur via VPM.
NOTE: A future RFP will be released for Construction Management and Field Inspection services for the construction phase of this project.
Task 6 Scope of Services:
Services during construction shall include, but not be limited to:
• Attend one (1) pre-bid conference/site examination, record all questions and requests for additional technical Information, and coordinate with and assist the City as required to issue addenda to be used for bidding purposes.
• Assist the City with responses to all Requests for Information (RFI) during the bid period. • Attend one (1) preconstruction conference/ site examinatlon and answer design-related questions that are raised.
• Respond to (RFls) during construction on technical issues associated with materials, products, design concepts, and design documents raised by the Contractor or City. The Consultant shall log all RFls and responses such that timely response can be assured. • Prepare record drawings reflecting available record information provided by the Construction Manager, Contractor, and equipment suppliers.
• Attend monthly meetings during construction,
• Submittal review as needed, if requested by City or Resident Engineer.
SDS and GHD will:
• Review shop drawings, RFI’s, contractor proposals and change orders as requested • Prepare proposals for changes and interpretations as requested • Prepare record drawings (in City format) for plan sheets identified above SDS and GHD will recommend bid item names, units and costs for the plans listed above.
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
TASK 5 FEE: $138,128
18 76
SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 6 DELIVERABLES
Deliverables, with the exception of record drawings, shall be distributed electronically via Virtual Project Manager.
• All records related to conferences and meetings
• RFI and any technical information backing up decisions • Record drawing deliverables shall be delivered in the following formats:
þ Portable Document Format (.PDF) file(s) of final plans complete with final signatures. þ Computed Aided Drafting flies (.dwg) of record drawings.
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE COMMERCIAL CENTER SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
TASK 6 FEE: $44,848
19 77
MD IS JM TM Tech Survey RW MS Prof Tech KS JS Plan SJ
$268 $231 $245 $286 $165 $337 $313 $237 $200 $220 $200 $150 $120 $175 1 a Coord Mtgs, Prep Agendas, Minutes 40 40
5 3 88 $21,745
b Coord & Consult with Team & Agencies 40 20 10 3 12 20 105 $22,140 c Coord & Assist with AHSC Program 20 10
4 34 $8,470
d Prep of Schedules & Updates 40
2 3 8 8 61 $13,880
e Prep Monthly Progress Reps, Payment Sub 40 5 2 3 8 8 66 $15,065 f Quality Assurance / QC Program 6 24 8 10 48 $11,366
g Maintenance of Project Files 24 24 $3,960
h Prep Presentations (WRHCO, City, Etc.) 12 4 12
6 3 37 $8,818
Total $51,456 $16,170 $0 $1,144 $5,940 $0 $3,756 $8,058 $5,200 $2,200 $3,000 $4,200 $4,320 $0 463 $105,444 2 a Data Collection & Field Survey 8 20 40 40
4 4 12 60 188 $37,428
b Preliminary Engineering 24 60 24 4 6 20 20 158 $35,326 c Urban Design & Landscape Architecture 8 24 16 16 4 12 20 8 108 $24,760 Total $8,576 $21,252 $4,900 $4,576 $13,200 $13,480 $2,504 $4,266 $8,800 $6,160 $800 $1,800 $7,200 $0 454 $97,514 3 a Prep of CEQA Docs / Studies (Gallaway) 10 24 70 20 124 $17,500b Prep of CEQA Docs / Studies (SDS) 4 40 44 $7,672 c Prep of CEQA Docs / Studies (GHD) 11 3 84 32 130 $27,994 d Coordinate & Consult with Agencies 4 16 8 4 32 $4,860 e Prepare Schedules & Applications 4 16 6 2 28 $4,270
f Review Draft Permits / Prepare Responses 4 32 20 2 58 $8,350 g Coordinate Public Mtg, Plan, Advertise 8 8 20 36 $6,744 Total $3,216 $0 $0 $0 $6,600 $0 $3,443 $711 $16,800 $7,040 $6,000 $16,200 $12,480 $4,900 452 $77,390 4 a Rev Existing Esmts / Determine Additional Esmts 16 16 $3,920 b Coordinate Public Mtg, Plan, Advertise, Solicitation
8 8 16 $4,104
c Coordinate, Prep, Record Additional ROW & Esmts 24 30 54 $10,830 d Coorinate, Prep, Record Additional Right of Entry
4 16 16 36 $7,632
Total $3,216 $0 $15,680 $0 $7,590 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 122 $26,486 5 a Prepare H&H Studies & Reports 32 40 72 $13,992b Floodplain Engineering, Survey, Investigation 8 8 12 28 $5,788 c Identify Conflicts, Coordinate & Prepare Plan 4 18
8 30 $6,550
d Landscape Architecture & Urban Design 16
3 16 8 43 $10,475
e Integrate Complete Streets Design 16 16 2 4 38 $8,790 f Coord with Rancheria, City, Other Partners 16 16 32 $7,984 g Determine Cons Sequence for Traffic Handling 24 12 4 10 50 $10,472 h Comp Calcs, Plans, Specs, Cost Estimates (60%) 16 40 16 1 24 10 107 $23,481 i Comp Calcs, Plans, Specs, Cost Estimates (90%) 8 40 12 1 24 10 95 $20,677 j Comp Calcs, Plans, Specs, Cost Estimates (100%) 4 32 12 1 24 10 83 $17,757 k Caltrans Encroachment Permit 14 14 $3,234
l Review Final Compiled PS&E Set 4 16
8 12 2 42 $8,928
Total $13,936 $55,440 $1,960 $9,152 $22,440 $0 $2,504 $1,896 $22,000 $8,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 634 $138,128 Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc.
City of Shasta Lake - Commercial Center Safe Routes to School Engineering & Planning Service
Schedule of Fees
23.0159.000
09/28/2023
Project Management
Preliminary Design & Data Collection
Total
Cost
Gallaway Enterprises Total
Hours
Task No Task Name Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer GHD
Environmental Compliance & Permitting
Right of Way Acquisition / Right of Entry for Construction Final Plans, Specifications, Estimates, Final Design Services 78 MD IS JM TM Tech Survey RW MS Prof Tech KS JS Plan SJ $268 $231 $245 $286 $165 $337 $313 $237 $200 $220 $200 $150 $120 $175 Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc.
City of Shasta Lake - Commercial Center Safe Routes to School Engineering & Planning Service
Schedule of Fees
23.0159.000
09/28/2023
Total
Cost
Gallaway Enterprises Total
Hours
Task No Task Name Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer GHD
6 a One Prebid Conf, Site Exam, Address Questions 4 16
4 1 1 1 27 $6,161
b Assist with Response to RFI 16 1 2 2 21 $4,773
c One Precon Meeting, Address Questions 2 8 1 1 1 13 $3,117 d Resp to RFI from Contractor/City, Log All RFIs 24
8 1 3 3 39 $8,361
e Prepare Record Drawings
4 8 2 2 16 $3,084
f Attend Monthly Meeting During Construction 24 24
2 50 $12,602
g Rev Submit as Needed from City or RE 16
8 2 3 3 32 $6,750
$8,040 $24,948 $0 $0 $4,620 $0 $1,252 $948 $2,400 $2,640 $0 $0 $0 $0 198 $44,848 330 510 92 52 366 40 43 67 276 122 49 148 200 28 2323 - $88,440 $117,810 $22,540 $14,872 $60,390 $13,480 $13,459 $15,879 $55,200 $26,840 $9,800 $22,200 $24,000 $4,900 - $489,810 Total Hours
Total Fees
Total
Assistance During Bid and Construction
79 Report and Recommendations 5
Reviewed and Approved
City Manager
AGENDA ITEM
City Council
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Whitney Zeller, Community and Economic Development Manager
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: Resolution to execute agreements with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for The City of Shasta Lake Community Parks Revitalization Project, funded through the Clean California Local Grant Program
FILE NO.: New
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute necessary agreements pertaining to the California Department of Transportation Clean California Local Grant Program for the Shasta Lake Community Parks Revitalization Project.
BACKGROUND
Caltrans Clean California Local Grant Program:
Caltrans developed the Clean California Local Grant Program through which funds go to local communities to beautify and improve local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, and transit centers. Through the combination of adding beautification measures and art in public spaces along with the removal of litter and debris, this effort intends to enhance communities and improve spaces for walking and recreation. Eligible projects include infrastructure or non-infrastructure projects that reduce litter, beautify public spaces, improve public health, and foster place-making.
The goals of the Clean CA Local Grant Program are to:
80 - Reduce the amount of waste and debris within public rights-of-way, pathways, parks, transit centers, and other public spaces.
- Enhance, rehabilitate, restore, or install measures of beauty and improve public spaces and mitigate the urban heat island effect.
- Enhance public health, cultural connection, and community placemaking by improving public spaces for walking and recreation.
- Advance equity for underserved communities.
The first funding Cycle of the Clean CA Local Grant Program was released in March 2022. 329 applications were submitted and approximately $300 million in funds were awarded to 105 projects (32% of applications). The City of Shasta Lake applied for Cycle 1 but was not selected for funding.
Cycle 2 of the Clean CA Local Grant Program was released in September 2023. 230 applications were submitted and approximately $100 million in funds were awarded to 42 projects (18% of applications). The City of Shasta Lake applied for Cycle 2 and was selected for funding.
City of Shasta Lake Community Parks Revitalization Project:
For Cycle 2 of the Clean CA Local Grant Program, the City of Shasta Lake submitted an application for the “Shasta Lake Community Parks Revitalization Project”. Projects included in this application were identified utilizing feedback from the 2022 Parks Survey, which received over 500 responses, as well as community feedback provided at Parks and Recreation Commission meetings. The project includes revitalization of two park sites in the City of Shasta Lake, creating clean, functional outdoor spaces for the community to gather and access recreation opportunities.
Improvements at the first site, Margaret Polf Park, include a covered picnic pavilion and replacement of the two existing pit toilet restrooms with flush restroom facilities and septic systems. The second project site is the Civic Center Campus which will address roughly 1.3 acres on the east side of campus behind the Larry J. Farr Community Center, and roughly 1.2 acres on the west side of campus along the parking lot. Improvements at this site include a picnic pavilion and restroom in the space behind the community center, and installation of the community spirit parkway on the east side of campus with native plantings, benches to rest and reflect, and art pieces to honor our community and those who have dedicated themselves to serving others. These projects will be completed in tandem with the upcoming skatepark and multi-use path at this site to establish a new space for individuals and families to gather and interact with the community.
In addition to these infrastructure projects, the application also included a volunteer clean-up day with an anticipated 100 volunteers to clean up park spaces, encouraging community stewardship of our local parks.
81 Project Funding and Next Steps
The City requested $1,753,000 through the Clean CA Local Grant Program and was awarded the full amount. The City also leveraged $1,623,000 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for the application which includes completion of the new Skatepark and multi-use walking path at the Civic Center Campus. The total project cost is $3,376,000 and is fully grant funded.
Next steps include approving a Council resolution allowing the City Manager or designee to execute agreements for the Clean CA Local Grant Program and accept funding. Once the required agreements have been executed, the City will begin the required environmental process and project design, followed by bidding and construction.
Projects must be delivered no later than June 30, 2026.
FISCAL IMPACT
A supplemental appropriation to the budget in an amount not to exceed $1,753,000 would be required if the funds are accepted by the City Council.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution CC-2023-XX
DISTRIBUTION
City Council
Finance
82 RESOLUTION NO CC-2023-XX
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE’S
COMMUNITY PARKS REVITALIZATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shasta Lake is eligible to receive State funding for certain transportation related work through the California Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, a Restricted Grant Agreement is needed to be executed with the California Department of Transportation before such funds can be claimed through the Clean California Local Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Shasta Lake wishes to delegated authorization to execute these agreements and any amendments thereto.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shasta Lake, authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all Restricted Grant Agreements and any amendments thereto with the California Department of Transportation.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October 2023 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
GREG WATKINS, Mayor
ATTEST:
TONI M. COATES, CMC
City Clerk
83 September 28, 2023 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ONLY
The Honorable Gavin Newsom
Governor, State of California
1021 O Street, Ste. 9000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: AB 1594 (E. Garcia) Medium- and heavy-duty zero-emission vehicles: public agency utilities –Request for Signature
Dear Governor Newsom,
The City of Shasta Lake (Shasta Lake) respectfully requests your signature on AB 1594 (Garcia).
The legislation offers a limited number of focused, common-sense solutions that help critical infrastructure utility providers, such as Shasta Lake, to maintain or enhance its emergency response capabilities while moving forward on a pathway to procure zero-emission medium- and heavyduty vehicles (ZEVs) everywhere feasible. Without your signature, we’re concerned recent regulations will compromise our emergency response capabilities at the detriment of Californian residents and businesses.
The City of Shasta Lake provides critical infrastructure utility services, including electric, water, and wastewater, to a predominately disadvantaged community of approximately 10,250 Californians in a geographic area of 11 square miles in beautiful Northern California. Despite being relatively small in population and footprint, our community has been exposed to several natural disasters that stretched our emergency response resources. We experienced the Carr Fire in 2018, the “atmospheric river” Winter Storms of 2019, and the “bomb cyclone” winter storm the week of Thanksgiving 2019, among others. The Carr Fire and atmospheric river event gained your support in declaring a state of emergency and were both followed by a Presidential emergency declaration, which unlocked the combined capabilities of Cal-OES and FEMA to help our organization and our community to recover. We thank you for your diligence then, and we ask for your continued diligence to help us retain our emergency response capabilities should such trying times occur again.
The California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) recently adopted Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) rule intends to contain reasonable accommodations for publicly owned utilities where the utility can show with evidence that there is no ZEV commercially available or capable of meeting the utility’s needs.
Unfortunately, these reasonable accommodation provisions are also unreasonably constrained, in our opinion. Publicly owned utilities can only access accommodations for replacement vehicles that are 13 years or older and the “daily usage” test limits the historic lookback period we’re allowed to consider when attempting to claim these reasonable accommodations. This is 84 problematic because due to their high use, many utility vehicles need to be replaced every 7-10 years. Also, the burden we place on our vehicles and equipment is vastly different under emergency situations and such high-intensity periods do not occur with regular frequency. Without providing reasonable flexibility, these rules hamper the ability of publicly owned utilities to reasonably compare the service capabilities of a ZEV to the vehicle being replaced, which impacts a utility’s ability to maintain service, respond to emergencies, and provide mutual aid assistance when needed.
AB 1594 (Garcia) will help the state meet its ZEV goals in a manner that accounts for the essential services agencies like ours provide to our communities. First, the bill requires a state agency to ensure rules applicable to vehicle fleet purchases allow public agency utilities to replace vehicles without regard to model year. Second, and perhaps of greater value to us, is the bill allows us to determine the daily usage of a utility vehicle that does not exclusively rely on the lowest mileage reading, does not exclude the highest usage days, and does not limit how much of our rich history we can incorporate in making this determination.
Bottom line, without your signature on AB 1594 (Garcia), when Shasta Lake begins implementing the CARB’s recently adopted regulations, we are required to pretend as if the Carr Fire, 2019 winter storms, and even the Covid-19 pandemic never happened, as all these events fall outside the historic window we’re allowed to consider when evaluating certain regulatory reasonable accommodations. We’re sorry, but these events did occur, they occurred recently, our staff abused our equipment to respond to these emergencies, and we’re proud of what we accomplished for those Californians we serve. We see no rational reason why we should be compelled to ignore history to shape our capabilities in an ever-changing world, and we hope you agree.
AB 1594 (Garcia) ensures CARB retains authority to develop a mechanism to determine the end of a vehicle’s useful life, and nothing in the legislation alters the CARB Executive Officer’s current authority to approve or deny a request from a public agency utility to use existing mechanisms in the ACF.
Thank you for considering our position on AB 1594 (Garcia). Please contact me at (530) 275-7411 with any questions about our position or our use of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles to uphold service reliability and to respond to emergencies.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF SHASTA LAKE
JESSACA LUGO
City Manager
jt
Cc: The Honorable Eduardo Garcia, Chair, Assembly Committee on Utilities & Energy 85