CITY COUNCIL
MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Tuesday, August 26, 2025
Closed Session 4:30 pm
Open Session 5:30 pm
Sierra Madre City Council Chambers
232 W. Sierra Madre Boulevard
Sierra Madre, California 91024
Mayor Robert Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tempore Kristine Lowe Council Members: Edward Garcia, Gene Goss, and Kelly Kriebs
PUBLIC COMMENT
The Council will listen to the public on any item on the agenda. Under the Brown Act, the City Council is prohibited from taking action on items not on the agenda, but the matter may be referred to staff or to a subsequent meeting. Each speaker will be limited to three continuous minutes, which may not be delegated. These rules will be enforced but may be changed by appropriate City Council action.
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA:
Persons wishing to speak on closed session items have a choice of doing so either immediately prior to the closed session or at the time for comments on items at the open session.
CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Mayor Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Lowe, Council Member Garcia, Council Member Goss, and Council Member Kriebs
PUBLIC COMMENT Regarding Closed Session Items
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION REGARDING:
1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Gov. Code § 54957.6)
City Negotiator: City Manager Michael Bruckner and Assistant City Manager Miguel Hernandez
Employee Organization: Sierra Madre Professional Firefighters’ Association
2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Gov. Code § 54957.6)
City Negotiator: City Manager Michael Bruckner and Assistant City Manager Miguel Hernandez
Employee Organization: Sierra Madre Classified Employees’ Association
3. Conference with Legal Counsel; Existing Litigation
(Gov. Code 54956.9(d)(1))
Name of Case: Protect Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra Madre et al.
Name of Petitioners: Protect Sierra Madre
Case No.: 24STCP01652
AGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING
SIERRA MADRE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 26, 2025
Closed Session 4:30 pm
City Hall Council Chambers
232 W. Sierra Madre Boulevard
Sierra Madre, California 91024
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer
ACTION ITEMS
Regardless of staff recommendation on any agenda item, the City Council will consider such matters, including action to approve, conditionally approve, reject, or continue such item.
MEETING ASSISTANCE
If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s Office at (626) 355-7135 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
SIERRA MADRE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 26, 2025
5:30 pm
City of Sierra Madre
City Council Chambers
232 W. Sierra Madre Boulevard
Sierra Madre, California 91024
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer
The Brown Act provides the public with an opportunity to make public comments at any public meeting; as an alternative, public comment may be made by e-mail to [email protected] by 3:00PM on the day of the meeting. Emails will be acknowledged at the City Council meeting, filed into public record, and scanned onto the City website for public review.
The meeting will be streamed live on the City’s website at sierramadreca.gov , on Foothills Media website at http://www.foothillsmedia.org/sierramadre and broadcast on Government Access Channel 3 (Spectrum)
CODE OF CONDUCT
The purpose of a City Council meeting is to conduct City business. Members of the public that behave in a manner that interrupts or obstructs the City Council’s ability to conduct City business may be asked to leave the meeting. Any and all demonstrations which disrupt, interrupt, or obstruct the City Council’s ability to conduct City business are prohibited. No signs, posters, or other large objects shall be brought into the Council Chambers or other meeting place if doing so would disrupt, disturb, or otherwise impede the orderly course of the meeting.
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Lowe, Council Member Garcia, Council Member Goss, Council Member Kriebs
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INSPIRATION
Council Member Kriebs
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Vote of the City Council to proceed with City business.
REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney report from the August 26, 2025 Closed Session.
1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Gov. Code § 54957.6)
City Negotiator: City Manager Michael Bruckner and Assistant City Manager Miguel Hernandez Employee Organization: Sierra Madre Professional Firefighters’ Association
2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Gov. Code § 54957.6)
City Negotiator: City Manager Michael Bruckner and Assistant City Manager Miguel Hernandez Employee Organization: Sierra Madre Classified Employees’ Association
3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; ECXISTING LITIGATION
(Gov. Code 54956.9(d)(1))
Name of Case: Protect Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra Madre et al.
Name of Petitioners: Protect Sierra Madre
Case No.: 24STCP01652APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
Approval of July 8, 2025 City Council Special Meeting minutes.
Approval of July 8, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting minutes.
APPROVAL FOR READING RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Vote of the City Council to read all Ordinances and Resolutions by title only and waive reading in full.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reporting of Council Members' activities related to City business.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION CODE OF CONDUCT
The City Council requests that participants refrain from making personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive remarks. A person who continues to disrupt the orderly conduct of the meeting after being warned by the Mayor or designee to cease the disruption may be precluded from further participation in the meeting. No signs, posters, or other large objects shall be brought into official meeting places if doing so would disrupt, disturb, or otherwise impede the orderly course of the meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT
The City Council will listen to the public on any item on the agenda. In addition, the City Council will devote time for public comment on items not on the agenda. Addressing the City Council from the audience is not permitted; all comments addressing the Council must be made from the podium. Only public comment made from the podium will be recognized by the City Council and entered into public record.
Providing Public Comment for Items on the Meeting Agenda Persons wishing to speak on any item on the agenda will be called during the comment period at the time the agenda item is brought forward. Persons wishing to speak on closed session items have a choice of doing so either immediately prior to the closed session or at the time for comments on items at the open session.
Provide Public Comment for Topics not on the Meeting Agenda Time shall be devoted to provide public comments for items not on the agenda. Under the Brown Act, the City Council is prohibited from taking action on items not on the agenda.
Providing Public Comment
1. Any person wishing to provide public comment is asked to complete a comment card. Each speaker will be limited to up to three continuous minutes, which may not be delegated or deferred.
2. Comments addressed to the City Council shall occur during the appropriate time on the agenda and should not be construed as an opportunity for dialogue.
PRESENTATION
1. PRESENTATION BY THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
2. SIERRA MADRE POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTED BEAR ACTIVITY UPDATE
3. LIBRARY SERVICES ANNUAL REPORT
ACTION ITEMS
Regardless of staff recommendation on any agenda item, the City Council will consider such matters, including action to approve, conditionally approve, reject, or continue such item.
CONSENT
a) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-46 APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution 25-46 ratifying payment of City Warrants in the aggregate amount of $439,443.93, Sierra Madre Library Warrants in the aggregate amount of $3,968.36, and Payroll Transfer in the aggregate amount of $1,096,492.94, for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2026. b) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-47 APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution 25-47 ratifying payment of City Warrants in the aggregate amount of $923,197.96, Sierra Madre Library Warrants in the aggregate amount of $613,734.50, and Payroll Transfer in the aggregate amount of $552,436.85, for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2026. c) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-48 APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution 25-48 approving payment of City Warrants in the aggregate amount of $1,591,996.89, Sierra Madre Library Warrants in the aggregate amount of $841,975.37, and Payroll Transfer in the aggregate amount of $561,553.78, for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2026. d) AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES TO MARIPOSA LANDSCAPE, INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $169,512.00 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026.
It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract for professional landscape services to Mariposa Landscape, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $169,512.00 e) FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PARCEL MAP No. 83897, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION AT 182 W. HIGHLAND AVENUE
It is recommended that the City Council approve the final subdivision map for Parcel Map No. 83897 and authorize the City Clerk to certify the map.
f) SECOND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE No. 1467 AMENDING CHAPTER 9.32 (NOISE) OF TITLE 9 (PUBLIC, PEACE, MORALS, AND WELFARE) AND CHAPTER 8.40 (LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT) OF TITLE 8 (HEALTH AND SAFETY) OF THE SIERRA MADRE MUNICIPAL CODE It is recommended that the City Council conduct their second first reading of Ordinance No. 1467, by title only, and approve first reading.
g) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION No. 25-49 REGARDING THE NEW NATIONAL OPIOIDS
SETTLEMENT
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 25-49 authorizing the City Attorney and/or City Manager to accept and participate in the new National Opioids Settlement Agreement with Purdue and the Sackler family.
h) CONSIDERATION OF A LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION FOR THE SIERRA MADRE LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR A $50,000 T-MOBILE HOMETOWN GRANT FOR LIBRARY MEANINGFUL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FURNITURE, FIXTURES, AND EQUIMENT (FF&E) It is recommended that the City Council approve and sign the proposed recommendation letter to T-Mobile for the Sierra Madre Library Foundation application for the Hometown Grant.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE No. 1484 AMENDING SECTION 17.60.056 (“DISCRETIONARY DEMOLITION PERMIT”) OF CHAPTER 17.60 (“VARIANCES AND DISCRETIONARY PERMITS”) OF TITLE 17 (“ZONING”) OF THE SIERRA MADRE MUNICIPAL CODE It is recommended that the City Council open a public hearing and conduct its first reading of Ordinance No. 1484, by title only.
DISCUSSION
1. CONSIDERATION OF THREE APPOINTMENTS TO THE SENIOR COMMUNITY
COMMISSION TO FILL VACANT SEATS
It is recommended that the City Council consider a partial-term appointment to fill an unscheduled vacancy ending June 30, 2026; and appoint two commissioners for full-term vacancies concluding June 30, 2029.
2. TRAFFIC SURVEYS AND TRAFFIC STUDIES REPORTS
It is recommended that the City Council approve recommendations in the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report, with the exception of raising the speed limit on E. Sierra Madre Blvd. and the Traffic Study and On-Street Parking Management Plan on W. Grand View Ave.
3. CONSIDERTION OF ALTERNATIVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE It is recommended that the City Council cancel the November 11, 2025, November 25, 2025, and December 23, 2025 City Council meetings, and authorize staff to pay all necessary expenses during that time. It is also recommended that the City Council schedule a Special Meeting during November to conduct City business.
AVAILABILITY OF AGENDA MATERIALS
Materials related to items on this agenda are available for public inspection on the City’s website at sierramadreca.gov.
LIVE BROADCASTS
Regular City Council meetings are broadcast live on Cable Channel 3 and rebroadcast on Wednesday and Saturday at 5:30 p.m.
MEETING ASSISTANCE
If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s office at (626) 355-7135 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will adjourn to its Regular Meeting on Tuesday, September 9, 2025.
PUBLIC COMMENT
The Council will listen to the public on any item on the agenda. Under the Brown Act, Council is prohibited from taking action on items not on the agenda, but the matter may be referred to staff or to a subsequent meeting. Each speaker will be limited to three continuous minutes, which may not be delegated. These rules will be enforced but may be changed by appropriate City Council action.
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA:
Persons wishing to speak on closed session items have a choice of doing so either immediately prior to the closed session or at the time for comments on items at the open session.
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Parkhurst called the meeting to order at 5:25 p.m. City Clerk Aguilar called the roll.
Present: Mayor Robert Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Kristine Lowe, Council Member Gene Goss, and Council Member Kelly Kriebs
Absent: Council Member Garcia.
Also Present: Julia A. Homaechevarria, Deputy City Attorney Miguel Hernandez, Assistant City Manager
Laura Aguilar, City Clerk
Gustavo Barrientos, Chief of Police
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Vote of the City Council to proceed with City business.
Council Member Kriebs made a motion to approve the agenda as presented.
Council Member Goss seconded the motion.
Mayor Parkhurst called for a vote of the Council:
Ayes: Mayor Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Lowe, Council Members Goss and Kriebs Noes: None.
Absent: Council Member Garcia.
Abstain: None.
The motion to approve the agenda as presented was approved by a unanimous voice vote by all Members present.
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
SIERRA MADRE CITY COUNCIL,
Tuesday, July 8, 2025
5:25 pm
City Hall Council Chambers
232 W. Sierra Madre Boulevard
Sierra Madre, California 91024
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer
PUBLIC COMMENT
The Council will listen to the public on any item on the agenda. Addressing the City Council from the audience is not permitted; all comments addressing the Council must be made from the podium. Only public comment made from the podium will be recognized by the City Council and entered into public record. Comments addressed to the Council shall occur during the appropriate time on the agenda and should not be construed as an opportunity for dialogue.
Each speaker will be limited to three continuous minutes, which may not be delegated or deferred.
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA
Persons wishing to speak on any item on the agenda will be called during the comment period at the time the agenda item is brought forward.
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
This meeting is a Special meeting. The City Council will only hear public comment for items on the agenda.
DISCUSSION
Update from Sierra Madre Police Department regarding interactions/incidents involving bears and people, pets, property.
It is recommended that the City Council provide staff with direction.
Police Chief Barrientos provided statistics and data on monthly bear call trends, bear categories, and Sierra Madre Police Department bear response protocols.
After Council discussion, Mayor Parkhurst opened the podium to receive public comment.
Seeing no one come forward, the Mayor closed public comment. The City Council continued their discussion and directed staff to provide updates at all upcoming City Council meetings.
The City Council adjourned their Special Meeting to a Regular Meeting.
Approved by Council Action:
________________________________
Mayor Robert Parkhurst
Minutes taken and typed by:
________________________________
Laura M. Aguilar
City Clerk
ACTION ITEMS
Regardless of staff recommendation on any agenda item, the City Council will consider such matters, including action to approve, conditionally approve, reject, or continue such item.
MEETING ASSISTANCE
If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s Office at (626) 355-7135 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
SIERRA MADRE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, July 8, 2025
5:30 pm
City of Sierra Madre
City Council Chambers
232 W. Sierra Madre Boulevard
Sierra Madre, California 91024
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer
The Brown Act provides the public with an opportunity to make public comments at any public meeting; as an alternative, public comment may be made by e-mail to [email protected] by 3:00PM on the day of the meeting. Emails will be acknowledged at the Council meeting, filed into public record, and scanned onto the City website for public review.
The meeting will be streamed live on the City’s website at www.cityofsierramadre.com, on Foothills Media website at http://www.foothillsmedia.org/sierramadre and broadcast on Government Access Channel 3 (Spectrum)
CODE OF CONDUCT
The purpose of a City Council meeting is to conduct City business. Members of the public that behave in a manner that interrupts or obstructs the Council’s ability to conduct City business may be asked to leave the meeting. Any and all demonstrations which disrupt, interrupt, or obstruct the Council’s ability to conduct City business are prohibited. No signs, posters or other large objects shall be brought into the Council Chambers or other meeting place if doing so would disrupt, disturb or otherwise impede the orderly course of the meeting.
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Parkhurst called the meeting to order at 6:14 p.m. City Clerk Aguilar called the roll.
Present: Mayor Robert Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Kristine Lowe, Council Member Gene Goss, and Council Member Kelly Kriebs
Absent: Council Member Garcia.
Also Present: Julia A. Homaechevarria, Deputy City Attorney Miguel Hernandez, Assistant City Manager
Laura Aguilar, City Clerk
Clare Lin, Director of Planning & Community Preservation Katelyn Huang, Assistant Planner
Leila Regan, City Librarian
Arnulfo Yanez, Director of Public Works
James Carlson, Senior Analyst
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INSPIRATION
Council Member Goss led the audience in the pledge of allegiance then shared inspirational messages by several notable figures.
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Vote of the City Council to proceed with City business.
Council Member Goss made a motion to approve the agenda as presented.
Council Member Kriebs seconded the motion.
Mayor Parkhurst called for a vote of the Council:
Ayes: Mayor Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Lowe, Council Members Goss and Kriebs Noes: None.
Absent: Council Member Garcia.
Abstain: None.
The motion to approve the agenda as presented was approved by a unanimous voice vote by all Members present.
REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION
The City Council met in Closed Session on July 8, 2025 to discuss:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(2) and Gov. Code § 54956.9(e)(1))
A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council on the advice of the City Attorney, based on the existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City. Facts and circumstances that might result in litigation but which the City believes are not yet known to potential plaintiff or plaintiffs.
Deputy City Attorney Julia A. Homaechevarria reported that the City Council met in closed session to discuss recent bear incidents; no reportable action was taken.
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
Approval of June 24, 2025 City Council meeting minutes.
Mayor Parkhurst asked Council for suggestions to amend the minutes; and also asked City Clerk Aguilar if any edits had been submitted by the City Council. City Clerk Aguilar stated that no suggestions for edits were submitted to the City Clerk’s Office in advance of the meeting.
Council Member Kriebs made a motion to approve the June 24, 2025 City Council meeting minutes as presented.
Mayor Pro Tem Lowe seconded the motion.
Mayor Parkhurst called for a vote of the Council:
Ayes: Mayor Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Lowe, Council Members Goss and Kriebs Noes: None.
Absent: Council Member Garcia.
Abstain: None.
The motion to approve the June 24, 2025 meeting minutes as presented was approved by a unanimous voice vote by all Members present.
APPROVAL FOR READING RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Vote of the City Council to read all Ordinances and Resolutions by title only and waive reading in full.
Mayor Parkhurst asked for a motion.
Council Member Goss made a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions by title only and waive the reading in full.
Council Member Kriebs seconded the motion.
Mayor Parkhurst called for a vote of the Council:
Ayes: Mayor Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Lowe, Council Members Goss and Kriebs Noes: None.
Absent: Council Member Garcia.
Abstain: None.
The motion was approved by a unanimous voice vote by all Members present.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reporting of Council Members' activities related to City business.
Mayor Pro Tem Lowe:
Attended SCAG’s Safe and Active Streets working group on June 25. Mayor Pro Tem Lowe shared that there will be a free helmet distribution opportunity, as well as grant opportunities.
Attended the SGV Council of Governments’ reception and Board installation on June 26 in Monrovia.
Attended July 3rd festivities at Memorial Park and participated in the community photo.
She also attended the July 4th parade.
On July 7, she attended the Governor’s press conference, marking the 6-month anniversary of the Eaton and Palisades Fires. She reported that 96% of all properties have been cleared of debris.
Council Member Kriebs:
Attended Fourth of July festivities and thanked the Sierra Madre Special Events Committee for organizing all the events.
On July 8 took a tour of the Library to see the progress of construction on the Meaningful Improvement Project.
Council Member Goss:
Attended the SGV Council of Governments reception on June 26.
Also attended the events on the third and Fourth of July.
Also took a tour of the Library. He reported on the progress of the project.
Mayor Parkhurst:
Reported that he attended a meeting of the Clean Power Alliance on June 25, 2025, no reportable action was taken.
The Mayor also attended the Los Angeles County Sanitation meeting on June 25.
Attended the reception at the SGV Council of Governments on June 26.
Reported that he also participated in the July 3rd and 4th festivities.
He also attended the July 8 tour of the Library construction site and thanked staff and everyone involved in this project.
At the conclusion of Council’s reports, Mayor Parkhurst opened the forum for public comment on items not on the agenda. City Clerk Aguilar announced that no speaker cards or e-mails had been submitted for items not on the agenda.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION CODE OF CONDUCT
The Council requests that participants refrain from making personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive remarks. A person who continues to disrupt the orderly conduct of the meeting after being warned by the Mayor or designee to cease the disruption may be precluded from further participation in the meeting. No signs, posters, or other large objects shall be brought into official meeting places if doing so would disrupt, disturb, or otherwise impede the orderly course of the meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT
The Council will listen to the public on any item on the agenda. In addition, the Council will devote time for public comment on items not on the agenda. Addressing the City Council from the audience is not permitted; all comments addressing the Council must be made from the podium. Only public comment made from the podium will be recognized by the City Council and entered into public record.
Providing Public Comment For Items on the Meeting Agenda Persons wishing to speak on any item on the agenda will be called during the comment period at the time the agenda item is brought forward. Persons wishing to speak on closed session items have a choice of doing so either immediately prior to the closed session or at the time for comments on items at the open session.
Provide Public Comment for Topics not on the Meeting Agenda Time shall be devoted to provide public comments for items not on the agenda. Under the Brown Act, Council is prohibited from taking action on items not on the agenda.
Providing Public Comment
1. Any person wishing to provide public comment is asked to complete a comment card. Each speaker will be limited to up to three continuous minutes, which may not be delegated or deferred.
2. Comments addressed to the Council shall occur during the appropriate time on the agenda and should not be construed as an opportunity for dialogue.
Seeing no one come forward, Mayor Parkhurst closed public comment and moved on to presentations.
PRESENTATIONS
1. PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH Mayor Parkhurst presented a proclamation to Community Services Supervisor Ted Tegart and Recreation Coordinator Brandon Wilson in recognition of July being Parks and Recreation Month.
ACTION ITEMS
Regardless of staff recommendation on any agenda item, the City Council will consider such matters, including action to approve, conditionally approve, reject, or continue such item.
CONSENT
City Clerk Aguilar presented the following reports:
a) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-43 APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution 25-43 approving payment of City Warrants in the aggregate amount of $308,954.91, Sierra Madre Library Warrants in the aggregate amount of $5,244.22, and Payroll Transfer in the aggregate amount of $627,214.37, for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2025.
b) CONSIDERATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS (CC&RS) FOR HIGHLAND GARDENS HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION CONDOMINIUM PROJECT (PARCEL MAP 83897) – 182 W. HIGHLAND AVENUE
It is recommended that the City Council approve the CC&Rs associated with Parcel Map 83897 at 182 West Highland Avenue, pursuant to City Council Resolution 25-44. c) FACILITATING RECOVERY AFTER THE EATON FIRE: SURVEY OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES
It is recommended the City Council accept the services offered by the coordinated efforts of the U.S. Department of the Interior working with the National Park Service and the City of Sierra Madre to complete a reconnaissance level survey of historic properties within the City of Sierra Madre.
d) APPROVAL OF THE FY 2025-2026 STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 25-45, approving the Statement of Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, consistent with California Government Code and best practices recommended by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). e) CONSIDERATION OF USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT AND CITY OF SIERRA MADRE REGARDING BAILEY CANYON
WILDERNESS PARK
It is recommended that the City Council approve a use agreement between the Los Angeles County Flood Control District and the City of Sierra Madre for the use of Bailey Canyon Wilderness Park.
At the conclusion of City Clerk Aguilar’s report, Mayor Parkhurst brought the matter to the City Council for questions.
Mayor Parkhurst opened the item for public comment. Seeing no one come forward, Mayor Parkhurst closed public comment and brought the matter back to Council for further discussion or a motion.
The City Council held extensive discussion on Consent E. Mayor Pro Tem Lowe made a motion to move Consent E to Discussion. Council Member Goss seconded the motion. The motion to move Consent E to Discussion was approved by voice vote, as follows:
Ayes: Mayor Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Lowe, Council Members Goss and Kriebs Noes: None.
Absent: Council Member Garcia.
Abstain: None.
Council Member Kriebs made a motion to approve Consent Items A through D.
Mayor Pro Tem Lowe seconded the motion to approve Consent Items A through D.
Mayor Parkhurst called for a vote of the Council:
Ayes: Mayor Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Lowe, Council Members Goss and Kriebs Noes: None.
Absent: Council Member Garcia.
Abstain: None.
The motion to approve Consent Items A-D was approved by a unanimous voice vote by all Members present.
Following the Council’s vote, Mayor Parkhurst continued the meeting onto the sole Public Hearing.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1467 AMENDING CHAPTER 9.32 (NOISE) OF TITLE 9 (PUBLIC PEACE, MORALS AND WELFARE) AND CHAPTER 8.40 (LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT) OF TITLE 8 (HEALTH AND SAFETY) OF THE SIERRA
MADRE MUNICIPAL CODE
It is recommended the City Council conduct its first reading of Ordinance No. 1467 amending Chapter 9.32 (Noise) of Title 9 (Public Peace, Morals and Welfare) and Chapter 8.40 (Landscaping Equipment) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Sierra Madre Municipal Code.
Assistant Planner Huang presented the report on this Public Hearing. Assistant City Manager Hernandez advised the Council that the Consultant was tele-conferencing into the meeting and available for any questions from the Council.
Once the report was completed, Mayor Parkhurst brought the matter to the City Council for questions.
Mayor Parkhurst opened the item for public comment. City Clerk Aguilar advised that Allen Ma sent a public comment e-mail for this Public Hearing.
Seeing no one come forward, Mayor Parkhurst closed the public hearing and brought the matter back to Council for further discussion.
The City Council discussed how this ordinance would apply to public schools, and if the City has jurisdiction to enforce noise levels at public schools.
Council Member Kriebs asked that any changes consider a method to measure and enforce the standards; and keep the time from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm.
Mayor Pro Tem Lowe asked to reword section A, B, and D in section 8.40.010 to clarify that “or any other machinery…” refers to landscape machinery.
Council directed staff to make changes to the Ordinance. Mayor Parkhurst directed staff to bring the updated ordinance back at a future meeting for a second first reading on the consent calendar.
At 7:57 Mayor Parkhurst called for a brief recess.
8:09 The City Council reconvened their meeting.
DISCUSSION
1. PERMITTING FOR FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTED ASSEMBLIES
It is recommended that the City Council provide staff with direction.
Deputy City Attorney Homaechevarria presented the report to Council and summarized SMMC Chapter 12.34.
At the conclusion of her report, Mayor Parkhurst brought the matter to the City Council for questions.
Mayor Parkhurst opened the item for public comment. Seeing no one come forward, Mayor Parkhurst closed public comment and brought the matter back to Council for further discussion.
2. CONSIDERATION OF STUDENT COMMISSIONER PROGRAM
It is recommended that the City Council provide staff with direction.
City Clerk Aguilar presented this report to the City Council.
At the conclusion of City Clerk Aguilar’s report, Mayor Parkhurst brought the matter to the City Council for questions.
Mayor Parkhurst opened the item for public comment. Seeing no one come forward, Mayor Parkhurst closed public comment and brought the matter back to Council for further discussion or a motion.
Council directed staff to create a Student Commissioner program for students ages 13-21; up to two non-voting commissioners may serve on each respective commission; Sierra Madre residency is not required; terms are one-year and may be re-appointed by the commission, must attend at least 75% of meetings, and must include two references along with their application. e) Consent Item ‘e’ was moved to Discussion by Council action.
CONSIDERATION OF USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT AND CITY OF SIERRA MADRE REGARDING BAILEY CANYON
WILDERNESS PARK
It is recommended that the City Council approve a use agreement between the Los Angeles County Flood Control District and the City of Sierra Madre for the use of Bailey Canyon Wilderness Park.
The City Council continued their discussion on Consent E. Senior Analyst Carlson reported on this item to the City Council.
Mayor Pro Tem shared her concerns about liability to the City if the agreement was approved. The City Council continued their discussion before Mayor Parkhurst opened the podium for public comment. Seeing no one come forward, Mayor Parkhurst closed public comment and brought the matter back to Council for further discussion or a vote.
Council Member Kriebs made a motion to approve the agreement between Los Angeles County Flood Control District and the City of Sierra Madre regarding Bailey Canyon Wilderness Park.
Council Member Goss seconded the motion.
The motion to move Consent ‘e’ was approved by voice vote, as follows:
Ayes: Mayor Parkhurst, and Council Members Goss and Kriebs Noes: Mayor Pro Tem Lowe.
Absent: Council Member Garcia.
Abstain: None.
The motion to approve the agreement between Los Angeles County Flood Control District and the City of Sierra Madre regarding Bailey Canyon Wilderness Park was approved by a vote of 3-1-1-0.
FUTURE ITEMS
Mayor Parkhurst asked if the Council had any suggestions for future agenda items.
Council Member Kriebs: ask Clean Power Alliance to report on the effect of the new federal budget to be on clean power and energy, generally.
Hearing no other requests from Council, Mayor Parkhurst moved to adjourn the meeting.
Council Member Kriebs seconded the motion to adjourn.
Mayor Parkhurst called for a vote of the Council:
Ayes: Mayor Parkhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Lowe, Council Members Goss and Kriebs Noes: None.
Absent: Council Member Garcia
Abstain: None.
The motion to adjourn the meeting to the next Regular meeting on August 26, 2025 at this same location was approved at 9:28 pm.
Minutes taken and typed by: Approved by Council Action:
_____________________ _______________________________
Laura M. Aguilar Robert Parkhurst
City Clerk Mayor
AVAILABILITY OF AGENDA MATERIALS
Materials related to items on this agenda are available for public inspection on the City’s website at www.cityofsierramadre.com.
LIVE BROADCASTS
Regular City Council meetings are broadcast live on Cable Channel 3 and rebroadcast on Wednesday and Saturday at 5:30 p.m.
MEETING ASSISTANCE
If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s office at (626) 355-7135 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will adjourn to a meeting to take place on August 26, 2025.
City of Sierra Madre
Agenda Report
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Anthony Rainey, Finance Director
REVIEWED BY: Michael Bruckner, City Manager
DATE: August 26, 2025
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FOR PAYMENT
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council approve payment of the following:
x Outstanding Obligated City Warrants: $923,197.96
x Outstanding Obligated Sierra Madre Library Warrants: $613,734.50 x Payroll Transfer: $552,436.85
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve the requested ratifications.
2. Direct staff to return with additional information.
SUMMARY
To ratify means to formally approve or confirm a decision or action, making it officially valid. In this context, it ensures that the City Council affirms the payment of public funds after a thorough review process. The City Council is requested to ratify warrants and approve checks issued for payment, as certified by the Director of Finance. These payments have been reviewed for compliance with the City’s approved budget, financial policies, and authorized spending limits.
Ratification by the City Council formally authorizes the disbursement of public funds, ensuring transparency, accountability, and adherence to sound fiscal management practices.
Attachment 1A – Warrant Register Post Date 8/12/25 - provides an aggregated breakdown of the warrants, including descriptions (e.g. categories of payments), amounts, and corresponding fiscal year allocations. Note that the last page It serves as a reference document to support the warrant approvals requested in this report, ensuring transparency and accountability in financial transactions. The attachment includes details on general warrants, utility bills, library warrants, and payroll transfers.
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer
Following Attachment 1A, the Check Approval Register provides a comprehensive record of financial disbursements by the City of Sierra Madre, detailing payment transactions, vendor information, and check dates to ensure transparency and accountability. Additionally, the Payroll Summary Register outlines payroll disbursements, including total earnings, employer expenses, and overall payroll costs for each pay period. The total payroll expenditure for the most recent pay period (PR #16) for Date 7/31/25:
Total Earnings (Salaries) @ $435,290.72 plus Employer Benefits1 @$117,146.13 = Total @ $552,436.85, This aligns with the payroll transfer amount listed in Attachment 1A. These records collectively support the accuracy and legitimacy of the financial transactions presented for approval.
ANALYSIS
State and City Requirements: The approval of warrants for payment by the City Council is a procedural requirement established under the California Government Code (§ 37208) and the Sierra Madre Municipal Code (§ 3.04.010). The City utilizes resolutions to approve warrants in accordance with Chapter 3.04 - Administration of Fiscal Matters under Title 3 - Finance of the Sierra Madre Municipal Code. These provisions outline the procedures and regulations governing the issuance and management of payment warrants, ensuring transparency, accountability, and compliance in financial transactions involving public funds.
Warrant: A "warrant" is a written authorization directing the payment of money to vendors, contractors, or service providers for goods or services rendered to City departments. These measures ensure that public funds are used appropriately and in alignment with City policies and legal requirements.
Purpose of the Process: The primary purpose of this process is to confirm that all payments align with the City’s budgetary allocations, procurement policies, and service agreements.
Approval by the City Council serves as a critical management control, ensuring that expenditures are lawful, necessary, and consistent with City priorities. Department Heads review and verify invoices, while City staff maintain robust internal controls through proper documentation, authorization workflows, and reconciliation procedures.
Warrant for Payment Report: This attached report, commonly referred to as the Check Approval Register, provides a detailed account of payees, payment amounts, and purposes.
This tool allows the City Council and staff to actively monitor expenditures, ensuring financial oversight, fostering public trust, and reinforcing fiscal responsibility. Failure to adhere to these practices could expose the City to financial risks, compliance issues, and diminished public confidence.
Check Approval Register Overview: The Check Approval Register is generated using the City's Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, Tyler Technologies Pro 10. This report offers a comprehensive overview of financial disbursements, including payee names, payment amounts, dates, and purposes. By providing a clear and detailed record of financial transactions, the register promotes transparency and ensures public funds are utilized effectively. This level of detail allows City Council members and residents to track municipal expenditures and reinforces accountability in financial management. The following are key fields from the Check Approval Register and their definitions:
1. Packet: Refers to a batch of payment transactions processed together, often linked to a specific date or approval cycle.
2. Vendor Set: Identifies the category or group of vendors (e.g., utilities, general, or project-specific).
3. Vendor Number: A unique identifier assigned to each vendor for tracking and referencing purposes.
4. Vendor Name: The name of the individual or organization receiving the payment.
5. Bank Code: A code representing the bank account from which the payment is drawn.
6. Payment Type: Specifies the method of payment, such as check, electronic funds transfer (EFT), or wire transfer.
7. Invoice #: The unique number associated with the vendor's invoice, serving as a reference for the payment.
8. Invoice Description: A brief summary of the goods or services rendered, as described on the invoice.
9. Account Number: The City’s general ledger account charged for the payment, structured as follows:
a. Fund Code: (e.g., 10000) Identifies the fund, such as the General Fund. b. Department Code: (e.g., 81200) Indicates the responsible department, such as Public Works.
c. Object Code: (e.g., 52200) Specifies the type of expenditure, such as contractual services.
10. Distribution Amount: The amount allocated to a specific account, showing how the payment is distributed across budget line items.
These fields ensure accuracy, transparency, and accountability in financial reporting and expenditure tracking, aligning with the City’s commitment to sound fiscal management practices. This process not only fulfills legal and procedural requirements but also underscores the City's dedication to effective governance and responsible stewardship of public funds.
CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN
Not applicable.
FINANCIAL REVIEW/SOURCE OF FUNDING
The payments presented for ratification have been made in accordance with the City’s approved budget for the fiscal year. All expenditures are charged to their respective funds and accounts as outlined in the City’s financial plan. The warrants, library payments, and payroll transfers were funded from the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, and other designated
funding sources, ensuring compliance with budgetary allocations and authorized spending limits. No unbudgeted or unauthorized expenses are included in this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA)
Not applicable.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies of this report can be accessed on the City’s website at www.cityofsierramadre.com.
Attachments
Resolution 25-47
1 These typically include: Payroll Taxes – Employer-paid portions of Social Security, Medicare (FICA), and state/federal unemployment taxes (FUTA/SUTA). Retirement Contributions – Employer contributions to pension plans or retirement accounts, such as CalPERS (California Public Employees' Retirement System). Health and Benefits Costs – Employer-provided health insurance, dental, vision, life insurance, or other employee benefits. Workers’ Compensation Insurance – Employer-paid premiums for workers' compensation coverage. Other Employer Liabilities – Any additional costs required by employment agreements, union contracts, or city policies.
RESOLUTION NUMBER 25-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS
WHEREAS, Government Code sections 37208-37209 authorize the City Council to ratify and approve warrants or checks drawn in payment of demands certified or approved by the Director of Finance as conforming to the budget; and, WHEREAS, the following demands have been reviewed and approved by the Finance Director; and,
WHEREAS, the Finance Director has verified that appropriated funds are available for payment thereof; and,
WHEREAS, the audited August 12, 2025 demands were released to vendors in accordance with City Council action item 1 on the May 13, 2025 Council meeting; and WHEREAS, City Warrants are the payment of bills, invoices and contractual obligations incurred by the City of Sierra Madre during the period enumerated therein, based on the approved fiscal year budget and existing budgetary authority, Municipal Code authority, or prior policy direction by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Payroll Transfer is the transfer of funds to cover the payroll costs for all City employees for the period enumerated therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Sierra Madre does hereby approve payment of City Warrants in the aggregate amount of $923,197.96; Sierra Madre Library Warrants in the aggregate amount of $613,734.50; and Payroll Transfer in the aggregate amount of $552,436.85 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025 and 2026.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August 2025.
_____________________________________
Mayor, City of Sierra Madre, California
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number 25-47 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Sierra Madre at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of August 2025.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_____________________________________
City Clerk, City of Sierra Madre, California
City of Sierra Madre
Department of Finance
Warrant Register Recap
City Council Meeting of August 26, 2025
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE AND SIERRA MADRE LIBRARY
City of Sierra Madre Warrants …..……….………….…….……..……….……..$923,197.96 Sierra Madre Library Warrants……...…..……..…………...…………..…….….$613,734.50 Payroll Transfer……..…..............………..……………………………………….$552,436.85
City of Sierra Madre
Agenda Report
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Anthony Rainey, Finance Director
REVIEWED BY: Michael Bruckner, City Manager
DATE: August 26, 2025
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FOR PAYMENT
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council approve payment of the following:
x Outstanding Obligated City Warrants: $1,591,996.89
x Outstanding Obligated Sierra Madre Library Warrants: $841,975.37 x Payroll Transfer: $561,553.78
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve the requested ratifications.
2. Direct staff to return with additional information.
SUMMARY
To ratify means to formally approve or confirm a decision or action, making it officially valid. In this context, it ensures that the City Council affirms the payment of public funds after a thorough review process. The City Council is requested to ratify warrants and approve checks issued for payment, as certified by the Director of Finance. These payments have been reviewed for compliance with the City’s approved budget, financial policies, and authorized spending limits.
Ratification by the City Council formally authorizes the disbursement of public funds, ensuring transparency, accountability, and adherence to sound fiscal management practices.
Attachment 1A – Warrant Register Post Date 8/26/25 - provides an aggregated breakdown of the warrants, including descriptions (e.g. categories of payments), amounts, and corresponding fiscal year allocations. Note that the last page It serves as a reference document to support the warrant approvals requested in this report, ensuring transparency and accountability in financial transactions. The attachment includes details on general warrants, utility bills, library warrants, and payroll transfers.
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer
Following Attachment 1A, the Check Approval Register provides a comprehensive record of financial disbursements by the City of Sierra Madre, detailing payment transactions, vendor information, and check dates to ensure transparency and accountability. Additionally, the Payroll Summary Register outlines payroll disbursements, including total earnings, employer expenses, and overall payroll costs for each pay period. The total payroll expenditure for the most recent pay period (PR #17) for Date 8/14/25:
Total Earnings (Salaries) @ $409,235.78 plus Employer Benefits1 @$152,318.00 = Total @ $561,553.78, This aligns with the payroll transfer amount listed in Attachment 1A. These records collectively support the accuracy and legitimacy of the financial transactions presented for approval.
ANALYSIS
State and City Requirements: The approval of warrants for payment by the City Council is a procedural requirement established under the California Government Code (§ 37208) and the Sierra Madre Municipal Code (§ 3.04.010). The City utilizes resolutions to approve warrants in accordance with Chapter 3.04 - Administration of Fiscal Matters under Title 3 - Finance of the Sierra Madre Municipal Code. These provisions outline the procedures and regulations governing the issuance and management of payment warrants, ensuring transparency, accountability, and compliance in financial transactions involving public funds.
Warrant: A "warrant" is a written authorization directing the payment of money to vendors, contractors, or service providers for goods or services rendered to City departments. These measures ensure that public funds are used appropriately and in alignment with City policies and legal requirements.
Purpose of the Process: The primary purpose of this process is to confirm that all payments align with the City’s budgetary allocations, procurement policies, and service agreements.
Approval by the City Council serves as a critical management control, ensuring that expenditures are lawful, necessary, and consistent with City priorities. Department Heads review and verify invoices, while City staff maintain robust internal controls through proper documentation, authorization workflows, and reconciliation procedures.
Warrant for Payment Report: This attached report, commonly referred to as the Check Approval Register, provides a detailed account of payees, payment amounts, and purposes.
This tool allows the City Council and staff to actively monitor expenditures, ensuring financial oversight, fostering public trust, and reinforcing fiscal responsibility. Failure to adhere to these practices could expose the City to financial risks, compliance issues, and diminished public confidence.
Check Approval Register Overview: The Check Approval Register is generated using the City's Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, Tyler Technologies Pro 10. This report offers a comprehensive overview of financial disbursements, including payee names, payment amounts, dates, and purposes. By providing a clear and detailed record of financial transactions, the register promotes transparency and ensures public funds are utilized effectively. This level of detail allows City Council members and residents to track municipal expenditures and reinforces accountability in financial management. The following are key fields from the Check Approval Register and their definitions:
1. Packet: Refers to a batch of payment transactions processed together, often linked to a specific date or approval cycle.
2. Vendor Set: Identifies the category or group of vendors (e.g., utilities, general, or project-specific).
3. Vendor Number: A unique identifier assigned to each vendor for tracking and referencing purposes.
4. Vendor Name: The name of the individual or organization receiving the payment.
5. Bank Code: A code representing the bank account from which the payment is drawn.
6. Payment Type: Specifies the method of payment, such as check, electronic funds transfer (EFT), or wire transfer.
7. Invoice #: The unique number associated with the vendor's invoice, serving as a reference for the payment.
8. Invoice Description: A brief summary of the goods or services rendered, as described on the invoice.
9. Account Number: The City’s general ledger account charged for the payment, structured as follows:
a. Fund Code: (e.g., 10000) Identifies the fund, such as the General Fund. b. Department Code: (e.g., 81200) Indicates the responsible department, such as Public Works.
c. Object Code: (e.g., 52200) Specifies the type of expenditure, such as contractual services.
10. Distribution Amount: The amount allocated to a specific account, showing how the payment is distributed across budget line items.
These fields ensure accuracy, transparency, and accountability in financial reporting and expenditure tracking, aligning with the City’s commitment to sound fiscal management practices. This process not only fulfills legal and procedural requirements but also underscores the City's dedication to effective governance and responsible stewardship of public funds.
CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN
Not applicable.
FINANCIAL REVIEW/SOURCE OF FUNDING
The payments presented for ratification have been made in accordance with the City’s approved budget for the fiscal year. All expenditures are charged to their respective funds and accounts as outlined in the City’s financial plan. The warrants, library payments, and payroll transfers were funded from the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, and other designated
funding sources, ensuring compliance with budgetary allocations and authorized spending limits. No unbudgeted or unauthorized expenses are included in this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA)
Not applicable.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies of this report can be accessed on the City’s website at www.cityofsierramadre.com.
Attachments
Resolution 25-48
1 These typically include: Payroll Taxes – Employer-paid portions of Social Security, Medicare (FICA), and state/federal unemployment taxes (FUTA/SUTA). Retirement Contributions – Employer contributions to pension plans or retirement accounts, such as CalPERS (California Public Employees' Retirement System). Health and Benefits Costs – Employer-provided health insurance, dental, vision, life insurance, or other employee benefits. Workers’ Compensation Insurance – Employer-paid premiums for workers' compensation coverage. Other Employer Liabilities – Any additional costs required by employment agreements, union contracts, or city policies.
RESOLUTION NUMBER 25-48
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS
WHEREAS, Government Code sections 37208-37209 authorize the City Council to ratify and approve warrants or checks drawn in payment of demands certified or approved by the Director of Finance as conforming to the budget; and, WHEREAS, the following demands have been reviewed and approved by the Finance Director; and,
WHEREAS, the Finance Director has verified that appropriated funds are available for payment thereof; and,
WHEREAS, the register of audited demands has been submitted to the City Council for approval; and
WHEREAS, City Warrants are the payment of bills, invoices and contractual obligations incurred by the City of Sierra Madre during the period enumerated therein, based on the approved fiscal year budget and existing budgetary authority, Municipal Code authority, or prior policy direction by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Payroll Transfer is the transfer of funds to cover the payroll costs for all City employees for the period enumerated therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Sierra Madre does hereby approve payment of City Warrants in the aggregate amount of $1,591,996.89; Sierra Madre Library Warrants in the aggregate amount of $841,975.37; and Payroll Transfer in the aggregate amount of $561,553.78 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025 and 2026.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August 2025.
_____________________________________
Mayor, City of Sierra Madre, California
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number 25-48 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Sierra Madre at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of August 2025.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_____________________________________
City Clerk, City of Sierra Madre, California
City of Sierra Madre
Department of Finance
Warrant Register Recap
City Council Meeting of August 26, 2025
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE AND SIERRA MADRE LIBRARY
City of Sierra Madre Warrants …..……….………….…….……..…….……..$1,591,996.89 Sierra Madre Library Warrants……...…..……..…………...…………….…..….$841,975.37 Payroll Transfer……..…..............………..……………………………………….$561,553.78
City of Sierra Madre
Agenda Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Clare Lin, Director of Planning & Community Preservation REVIEWED BY: Michael Bruckner, City Manager
DATE: August 26, 2025
SUBJECT: FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 83897, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION AT 182 WEST
HIGHLAND AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council is requested to:
1. Review and approve the final subdivision map for Parcel Map No. 83897 (Attachment A); and,
2. Authorize the City Clerk to certify Parcel Map No. 83897.
BACKGROUND
x On June 28, 2022, the City received a tentative parcel map proposing a subdivision for the property located at 182 West Highland Avenue. The tentative map was then forwarded to the Fire Department, Public Works Department, and Building and Engineering Services for review and comment.
x On May 4, 2023, at a noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended that the City Council approve the tentative parcel map. x On May 23, 2023, at a noticed public hearing, the City Council reviewed and approved the tentative parcel map pursuant to Resolution 23-31. This approval is valid for two (2) years, expiring on May 23, 2025.
x On July 27, 2023, a permit was issued for the demolition of existing structures on site and for the construction of the residential project. Demolition of the existing structures has since been completed. The demolition, Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), and public and site improvements are conditions of approval required prior to final map approval.
x On March 14, 2025, a final map application was submitted to the City for review and determination of completeness.
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer
Final Parcel Map No. 83897
x On July 8, 2025, the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) were approved by the City Council.
ANALYSIS
The project was approved based on findings that the proposed subdivision complies with the General Plan designation and the development standards of the Zoning Code. Following approval of the tentative map, the applicant prepared the final map and obtained necessary approvals through the City’s Engineering Services. The applicant also completed demolition of existing structures, site grading and excavation activities, and construction of a three-unit condominium development.
The applicant has secured the requisite approvals to proceed through the subdivision process.
Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council approve the final map pursuant to SMMC
16.16.040. The action requested of the City Council is among the final steps toward completing the subdivision and creating three (3) condominium units. The owners of these airspace units will hold an undivided interest in the common area of the lot which measures 11,916 square feet.
All conditions of approval associated with the tentative parcel map have been substantially satisfied. Remaining public improvements, including right-of-way improvements such as sidewalk installation, curb and gutter replacement, and driveway approach, will be completed during the final stage of development prior to the issuance of final building occupancy approval.
Additionally, the subject property is not located within the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, as designated by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE).
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Before the City Treasurer may sign the final subdivision map, the applicant must submit proof from the Los Angeles County Assessor confirming that all outstanding property taxes for the subject property have been paid in full. Once the map is signed, the applicant will submit it to Los Angeles County for recordation, which will officially finalize the subdivision.
Approval of the final subdivision map for Parcel Map No. 83897 will result in the creation of two additional residential parcels. The Los Angeles County Assessor will assign a separate land value to each parcel. Combined with the value of the completed improvements, this will increase the overall assessed valuation of the property. This increase will generate additional property tax revenue, a portion of which will be allocated to the City of Sierra Madre.
STRATEGIC PLAN CORRELATION
Approval of a subdivision is not specifically addressed within the City of Sierra Madre Strategic Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA)
On May 23, 2023, pursuant to Resolution 23-31, the City Council declared that the project is exempt from environmental review. Pursuant to section 15315 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this project qualifies for Class 3 and Class 15 categorical exemption from environmental review because the project consists of multifamily subdivision of property located in an urbanized area zoned for residential use into four or fewer parcels. Because the division Final Parcel Map No. 83897
is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available. The parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies of this report are available at the City Hall public counter, the Temporary Sierra Madre Public Library, and can be accessed on the City’s website at sierramadreca.gov.
Attachments
Attachment A – Parcel Map No. 83897
Attachment A
408284.3 1
RESOLUTION NO. 25-49
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SIERRA MADRE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY
TO PARTICIPATE IN THE NATIONAL OPIOIDS
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PURDUE AND THE
SACKLER FAMILY
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on November 9, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21- 66, approving participation in a national opioid settlement with the three largest opioid distributors — McKesson, Cardinal Health, and Amerisource Bergen — and the opioid manufacturer Janssen (owned by Johnson & Johnson).
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-26, approving participation in another national opioid settlement with opioid manufacturers — Allergan Finance, LLC/Allergan Limited and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. - and the major chain pharmacies - Walmart Inc., CVS Health Corporation/CVS Pharmacy, Inc., and Walgreen Co.;
WHEREAS, in 2025, a new proposed national opioids settlement was reached with Purdue and the Sackler family, to resolve direct claims against the Sacklers held by states, local governments and other creditors (“Settlement Agreement”); WHEREAS, to participate in the Settlement Agreement, the City Council must adopt this Resolution to authorize the City Attorney and/or City Manager to execute the Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement by September 30, 2025; WHEREAS, the number of government agencies that participate in the Settlement Agreement will determine whether participation is sufficient for the settlement to move forward and whether a state earns its maximum potential payment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to participate in the Settlement Agreement to maximize the share of settlement funds distributed to the City and the State.
THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIERRA MADRE, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The Recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 2. Approval. The City Attorney and/or City Manager are hereby authorized to participate in the national opioids settlement agreement with Purdue and the Sackler Attachment A
408284.3 2
family. Any other actions taken or to be taken with respect to the matters contemplated under this Resolution are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. Pursuant to Government Code Section 36932, the City Clerk shall certify the passage, approval, and adoption of this Resolution by the City Council.
SECTION 4. Certification. The Sierra Madre City Clerk shall attest to the passage and adoption of this Resolution by the City Council and shall cause the same to be listed in the records of the City.
SECTION 5. Severability. If any sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution or any part hereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraph, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August, 2025. __________________________
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
I HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing Resolution 25-49 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Sierra Madre, California, at a meeting held on the 26th day of August, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
___________________________
Laura Aguilar, City Clerk
!"#$%$!
&
&
&
'
(
&)
* +&
&
,
, *
+&
-
&
.
)
-
- & & -
.
- &)
&
'
&
/
0
1(
- &)
&
-,
&
'
,
&/
2
1
-&&&0
&/
1(*+&
2
-,
&
3,
0
&&
2
- *
4, -&
-
-
- &
2
*
+&
,
+&
&
2
-
5
+&
!
"
#
'/
$%&&-, &
&
*
!"!#! $ %&'!(
!
" #$
%
&
'
$%"
$
% %' (%' )
' *+"
,+,-"$%''(%'.%
'
$/$
$%
%!%
$'(%'$$
$&)'
$!$)
$%
!&!
&
$%
).
&$0$$&$
.
'
'
$'!
&
6
,
,
#$
7$78 &
,
&&
Attachment B
&
,
&&
9
&
2
*
&
,
-
,
,*
&
,
&
,*
, &
&
2
& &
2
,
&
, &
-
& - &
2
*
, &
&
-
&
*
,
,
-5
&
&
:
- *
4 -
&
&
&
3
.
& & *
+&
-&-
-
&
&&-, &
&
* +&
&
&
&&,:';8<(
9
-
-, *
-
-&
-
&3,
0
&&
2
-
&
-
&
&
&
&
==
*=
)
=*+&
*
%#
%'
'
$0(%'
1 +& & &
- & 9
-
&
'!(&
!
09 - &
&-& 2-
&-
- &
- &
, .
*
0 - &
&
-&
-
&
&-&
&&
&
-
-
*
'7('
!
2-
-
&
2-
&
*
* &
- -
-
,2-
-
- &
, .
*
'#('
,
9
-2- &-
,
>
**
&
2
, &
&
&
:
?@A
,
, B@
A
2B*
2
&-
&
-& - -&&C
-
&
==
*=
)
=*4
>
**
2
3
3
4 25
5
2
3
3
&
%
$
$
%&$!$
$%%''6
(%'
$/$
$%
%
$
/%
%
'
7'
)
!.)&$
&
)!70%&.
)'
$
%!$
$%
%)'
$!$)
$
'
$'!
&
(.%
'!$/ )!70
% /%
%
)& .%
%
& (%&&%#
))&$!&
$
'
!
$%
(%' /%
$0
5
3
$04%)'$%(%'
$/$
$%
%)
'*+",+,-
&, D
9 -&
&
>
*(&
3
.
-, >
:**-,*
+& )
&
2
)* +
*
,
-*
!
*
*
!
!
"
#
$
%
&'
(*!
%
%
+
,
&
'(*
!
!
%
!
%
-!
-
.
. $
-
-
!
%
/
#
0
1!
%
#
%
.
. $
, !
2!
-
3
0
0
.
4
0
0
!
,5
6.
789!
#
:
/
/
%
,
-
#3
%
..
;. $
#
%
.
9. <
%
0
!
%
!
!
%
!
%
-
, .
=. $
.
>. $
%
3
:
-
2
:
/
!
/
!
/
%
?
%
-
/
%
?
!
!
.
?@
.
$
A-
%
%
6
%
#
!
/
-
!
.
B. $
.
7. $
!
#
%
!
%
%
0
!
-
8 &0
*!
-
!
!
!
%
!
!
!
A
!
-
!
!
%
!
%
0
!
/
/
!
%
!
C
-
%
!
0
#
0
#
!
, !
%
%
%
0
!
!
-
!
%
0
-
%
-
&-
*!
-
=9
-
3
!
%
C
&-
%
-
*!
-
/
!
!
&*
%
!
!
-
!
-
!
&
*
,%
!
/
#
, !
!
&
*
!
&
*
!
&
*
&<*
-
!
%
,%
-
&
!
0
#
!
'
0
(!
0
#
0
#
!
'0
(*.
1
%
-
0
0
%
%
0
#
0
#
%
%
0
&-
%
*
!
!
&-
3
!
%
!
*
&*
%
!
!
-
!
-
!
&
*
,%
!
/
#
, !
!
&
*
!
&
*
!
&
*
&<*
-
!
%
,%
-
.
D.
0
!
%
%
!
!
%
%
!
!
!
!
%
%!
!
!
-
A
%
%
0
0
0
#
0
#
-
!
%3
D.8
.
$
&
'
0
?@
(
'0
(*
%
%
0
%
%
%
0
#
0
#
%
%
%
-
0
0
/
/
-
.
$
%
%
0
0
.
8. $
/
/
:
-!
0
#
0
#
!
, !
%
0
0
%
0
.
. $
%
A
%
#
%
.
. E
-
!
/
-
!
!
!
!
%
%
-
F
3
!
-!
-
!
%
!
C
G
=9
!
-
/
A-
/
/
!
A-
%
!
-
-
%
.
0
-
A-
!
%
!
%
-
0
!
%
%
/
-
!
!
!
!
, !
0
/
%
-
0
A-
/
!
-
!
!
!
-
!
-
!
A-!
-
:
.
;. 6
-
!
-
%
.
$
/
#
0
1
!
%
!
%
!
.
9. 6-
!
&/*
&*
/
&<*
%
-
%
#
H
&*
0
%
%3
%
/
D.8
.
?@;
E
-
/
#
0
1
%
.
6
$
,
?@9
!
"
#
$
% &'
()*+'$
,
-
#
$ .
%/0
-
#1 "
/
&
$
$
#$
/
# $
-#2
#$3.
$
4
3
#5
.
43 "$1
1 "$
6
7
8
9&&
.
"$4
7
47 "$#
#$4
. "$
-
#1&
:
$
# #
#;
$
##
9
4
3<:3<:#
'&=$'&=($'&=)3<
7
43
>&'">&'
"
$
/
&
3<
?$+$
43$
@
2
&
"
"
4
4
"
A
"
#
A "%
9
& :
$
3<
<
9
.
"$2$ B 43&
"
9
.
&:
$
9
.
.
C
C
.
-
#
&
:
#$
#
&
&
(
"
$
9
.
$
/
$
$
?
.
?
$(=(=&
"
#
$2&
99
A <
&$C
,2&
B
B
&A2
2&AD
2&
1#
%&D&A
2
$2&AE#
,"2&AF
&$
2
9&$
:
$99
$
9
$
D
C
$
D#$2&$B
&$B
2&$ 6 5
6 $6
$2&$9&&$
C
$2&$
$2&
-
$1F
$.&
7 &
$-
#
$6
$.
$1
$
$2
9
$.&F
$1
.&&
"
/
$
$
#
#
/
##
?
$(=(=&
# $
%
G @
4
. $/
/$4
. #
& /
4
. &
#
G
/
?
7
$<
/
#
>&=(
"
43
+&=
"
"
1&
#
#
#;
$
#
9
4
3<: 3<
:$
/
&
&
:
$>H
"$I=H
:
: "$>H
:
: "&
:
#
G
/
#
?
7
&
)
'
" #
#
G
/
:&
:
/
/
%
?
9
1.9% &
(J=+"$G
#
$
$
&
:
<
9
"&:
$
9
.
/$
$
/
=$===<
"
:&
"
#$
# #$/
9
/
$
/
#
4
.
&
"
#/
9
/
&9
#
/
#
/
#
$
#$
#
A
$
#
#
#
%
?
/
.
$2&
-
"$
C
$2&$1F
.
"$
#;9
/
#
#&9
#
#
@
<
#
#$
/
#;
:$/
/
/
+&-&
,
:"&
"
#/
#
#
##
$
#
#
#
$
/
#$
#
*=#
#.&
" /
9
##
#
#
$
$
#$
&
" :
#
$ <
/
#
/
4
.
+
A
/$
# <
:
# G
#
&
"
:/
?
7
9
?
7
,$/
3<
3
43&
" 2
@
$
>=H
#
:
#
/
/
C
2
K
"
/
-
C
2
A
("
/ <
,.
,. "
A
)"
"
#
#,.A
+"
/
,.
G
#
$
#
# /
/ "
$
$
#
#$
G
$
A
>"
# $
$#
$G
G
# $# <
$ # A
*"
<
<
<
&
"
.
C
.C
"#
"
#
C
2
&.C
/
/
$
$
C
2
&
" :
$
G @
4
.
/$
#
$
/
/
/
$
$$
$
?
7
:&:$
:
?
7
/
4
.
$ #
>
#
//
##
:
$
#
#
#
#
&
(
)
"
>
/$
-
#
#
&.C
#
#
/
#
:
/
4
.
&
" 2
.C
;
:
/
4
.
$
/
/
# $.C
@
/
&
&
" 2
$.C
#
;
:/
#
@
$
#
/
<
&
" 2
$#
/
6
/
@
4
.
&C /$
#
$
$
<
$
#
/
<
/ .C
$
/
&
" % /
$
#
#
#
#
$
$
$
$
$
&
& :
#
G
/
:&
:/
2
&
/
$
G #
#4
.
$
?
7
<$/
#
<
&
*
C /$
>H
>H"
<&
'
?*$(=($6.
,&&.
$% .
?
$
3.
$
3
:.
%
)J+"1.9:? "
%
?
9
1.9% &(J=+"L
M
>H&
#
9
4
3<:
4
. $
$ #::
:
/
?
.
&
#
#
>H
>H"
: #
#
#
-
"$ 3<
7
431.9:?$
K"#$ /
##
#
9
4
3<:
$ <
>H
;
#
A("
##-
/
/
'>H?
@
>&=("
43
+&=
"
"
1&-
<
-
$
#
9
4
3<:
4
. &:$
#
#
#
G&
-
$
<(#
#
$
$
?
#4
&
?
#4
$
@
$<#<
#
<(&
?
#
4
/
@
<
&
:
$
@
@
-
$ -
#
#
#
$
/
#4
&
I
*
" .C
/
/
;
#<
#
&
/
#
.C
/
&
" 3
#
-
#
/
/
#
$
#<
#
& /
-
#
/
4
.
& /
#
#.C
&
#
.C
/
/
&
"
:/
<
& 3
#
:
& #
$
$
:
#
#
/
#
#&,
/
<$
;
<
: #/
G
#<
&
" 3
:/
<
$@
#4
.
&
$
:
@
#?
7
#
$ /
/$
# #;
$
$
&
>&=(
"
43
+&=
"
"
1$
;7
&
" 2#
/
.C
.C
/
?
7
#
&
+ ,
" #
#
/
6
@
&-
/
/
#
G
$
&
J
" 3<
4
. $
###
&2
#
$
#$#
#&
" 3<
$
#
# $
#$
$ #<$
$
$
$
$
/
$/
#$
/
<
#
/&
" 3<
4
. $
#
/
/
&
'
$
1
#$
$
F%?B93.43
7
.
,
:
@
2
3
7
.
,
:
&
2/
#
G#2
# /
8
<
4
3
#&
K
NN
%K NN
K
NN
.K NN
3%.2O
! -!,.K
#
$
$/
$
& /
#
+&
&
7
.
,
:P
$/ /
&
$
#
$
G
&7
$
+&-&&$
/
9
##
:
#
#
$
$
#
:$
&7
$ #
$/
2
$/
2
&7
$
==H
==H"
:
$
+&-&7
$
==H
==H"
:
$
+&
&7
B
$
==H
==H"
/
&
3%.2O
>
// ///0 // ///0 // ///0
1
2
)
#
(&))(H (&J>)H " &"#34*"0
#
=&=*'H / /*3/+"0
#
#
=&=)H / //33+50
# -
#
=&>(H / "&4+*+0
# .
=&=))H =&=+=H / /##55/0
# 3#
=&=()H / /5*3+*0
# :
=&=JH / /555*3+0
# C#/
=&IH / /4++"50
# 9
=&=>+H / /&&+3&/0
# %/
=&=(*H / /"3+"+0
# ?
=&+J*H =&>'>H / */**+/0
#
=&=+H / /&/+&0
#
=&=*IH / /**&*&30
# 9
=&=)'H / /#""+30
# ,
#
=&=+)H / /#*"&5&0
#
=&((*H =&(IIH / "#&455*0
#
- &*>H &'I>H +35#350
#
- =&(*H =&(*+H / ""&+&440
# ?
- =&=I'H / /+&+*4*0
#
=&((*H =&(IIH / "#*+&&0
#
=&=>'H / /&54""H
#
(&=(H (&>IH " 5&&*5*0
#
=&=)IH / /#/5340
# -/
=&=(*H / /"*##40
#
#
=&==(H / //5/+/0
#
=&=>>H / /&*++3+0
# .
=&==H / //5""**0
# 3
=&=()H / /54/"&0
# C
=&==H / //35"3#0
3%.2O
(
>
1
2
)
# 9
#
=&==*H / //&+/#/0
# 1
8
=&=(H / //45*4#0
# 1
=&==+H / //#//30
# ?
#
=&==H / //34&+0
# ?
=&==>H / //#5*30
#
=&=)H / //4/40
#
=&=>)H / /&#+#+40
#
C
=&=)H / //+#/40
# 7
=&+*H / "/&&&0
#
=&=JH / /&55�
# 7
=&=(H / /3+&*40
# B
=&=(*H / /""#"0
#
.
% =&+H =&+=H / 54+/50
#
3 . =&I*JH =&')'H / 345//#&0
#
3
. =&=>H / /"3+&"0
# 9
3
. =&=JH / /++*&*+0
#
: &J'>H (&)JH 4+4#&/0
#
: =&=*>H / /*#+"H
#
: =&=(H / //45**&0
# : : =&)'IH / #"3/+/*0
# F : =&==>H / //&"*#&0
# F
: =&==JH / //+++30
# 1 : =&==(H / //4#530
# ?
: =&==+H / //#*+/30
#
: =&==JH / //+43**0
# 7
# : =&=(H / //455/&0
# : =&=JH / /&+#*0
#
: =&=>H / /"3*#30
#
4 =&=IH =&)H / +4350
#
C
&=)=H &(*=H /3/#5*0
3%.2O
)
>
1
2
)
# C
=&=>+H / /&&3++/0
# 3
C
=&IH =&+)H / "+"5&0
# : C
=&=)(H / /"++5#30
#
2
=&(>JH =&)>H / "+34//+0
# -/
# 2
=&=H / //5345+0
#
<
2
=&='H / /*"3440
# 3
2
=&>JH / #/"*""0
# 2
2
=&==*H / //&5340
#
2# =&=I)H =&=J'H / /3*&�
#
F (&>IH )&=I'H " +*4&*0
#
F =&==*H / //&+&"*0
# -
F =&((H / 3&3450
#
# F =&=='H / //3/5"/0
# .
F =&=)=H / /"&4#+0
# 1:
F =&==)H / //"*+&&0
# 7
F =&=>H / /"/4#50
#
F =&=)H / //#&30
#
F =&=='H / //3#*5/0
# B F =&==JH / //+45+0
#
F
=&(')H / "&#&+40
#
F
=&==IH / //*+##*0
#
F
=&=)H / //3/#"0
# C
F
=&=(IH / /""+/#50
# 9 F
=&=*H / /#4//0
#
9
=&I'>H / +*&*#540
#
9
=&=+H =&=>=H / /&"+"*#0
# 9
9
=&=(H =&=(*H / /"""4+&0
#
9 =&)'H =&)'H / ##"/+/0
#
9 =&=(IH / /"4"4*0
#
9
)&J'*H *&'''H & &**40
3%.2O
+
>
1
2
)
# C
9
=&==>H / //&//"&0
#
9
=&=+(H / /#&##/40
#
9
=&=))H / /"+3350
#
9
=&==H / ///*//0
# 8 9
=&=(*H / /"/5*30
# -
/
9
=&=(IH / /"5*"/0
# -
9
=&==JH / //+535#0
# -
/ 9
=&==(H / //&&5*0
# -
4 9
=&=+H / /&#/0
# -
#C
9
=&=*>H / /*#&5430
# -
9
=&==H / /5"##"0
#
9
=&==*H / //&54&50
#
9
=&='H / /*45/*0
#
9
=&==>H / //#4+5"0
#
9
=&==H / //5"*5&0
#
9
=&===H / ///"430
#
9
=&=++H / /#+55"0
#
9
=&=(JH / /""4"30
#
# 9
=&==H / ///+/"/0
#
# 9
=&=>>H / /&&454&0
# .
- 9
=&==H / ///+44#0
# . /# 9
=&=>(H / /&"444&0
# . 9
=&==)H / //"3"+0
# 3
1 9
=&=)H =&=)JH / /#545*0
# 3
9
=&=))H / /"+5/"/0
# 4 9
=&=)+H / /"35/550
# 4
9
=&**H / #++*5+0
# 4
9
=&=*H / /#&&H
# C/
4 9
=&==>H / //&/*&40
# C/ 9
=&=>=H / /&/35##0
3%.2O
>
>
1
2
)
# C - 9
=&=JH / /&*#/30
# C
9
=&=()H / /4/++30
# 2
/ 9
=&=>'H / /&544*0
# 9
:
9
=&==)H / //"**+*0
# 9
/ 9
=&==>H / //#4430
# 91
9
=&==H / //5*3"0
# 9 9
=&=+>H / /#+4+540
# 9 9
=&==(H / //"4440
# 9D 9
=&=(+H / /4&4/0
# 9/
9
=&==(H / //33#0
# 9
9
=&==+H / //#4&/0
# 9 - 9
=&+)'H / #+&*0
# 9
9
(&I>H )&)(H " 5"550
# 9#/ 9
=&=*H / /#&#&*0
# 1
9
=&==(H / //4"+40
# 1- 9
=&=)(H / /"+/+5+0
# 1#/ 9
=&==+H / //#**"50
# 1
9
=&=)H / /"*&&**0
# 1
9
=&=)=H / /"*/+3/0
# 1 #
9
=&=)H / /"*++330
# % /
9
=&=)H / /"*5""50
#
9
=&=+*H / /#3*5"30
#
D3 9
=&==*H / //*#/"0
# 9
=&=H / //4&5#0
# 9
=&+*H / "//*"&0
#
7
9
=&=((H / /5####0
# 9
=&H / /44##0
# 7
D 9
=&==(H / //"+&*0
# 7 - 9
=&=*(H / /*/+44"0
# 7 9
=&==)H / //"5"+/0
3%.2O
*
>
1
2
)
# .
9
=&==)H / //""/+0
# : 9
=&=)H / //&5#30
# 4
9
=&=JH / /&33"+0
# 1
9
=&=='H / //3#340
#
9
=&=((H / /35+30
# :
9
=&=)H / /"*3*#0
# 1
9
=&>JH / "45*#0
#
1 9
=&==*H / //&5+&+0
#
C
9
=&==H / //5&55&0
# 3
1 9
=&==>H / //#4+/#0
# 4 9
=&=(=H / /++"3"0
# 9
=&=(H / //4*##&0
#
# 9
=&==>H / //#4&450
# 9
=&(H / /445"/0
# B
9
=&==*H / //&3#/*0
# B
9
=&=+'H / /&/&*"0
# BC
#/ 9
=&=)H / //5*30
# B
9
=&=)(H / /"+/*50
#
1 =&)+'H =&+(IH / #+#/++40
#
/
1 =&=(H / //43##"0
# 1 1 =&=)'H / /#5&&0
#
1
=&>*+H =&*'=H / *5+#"*0
# 9
1
=&=>H / /"&+430
# 1
D
# 1
=&=(=H / /+5&/0
# % 1
=&=(JH / /""45"&0
#
1
=&=='H / //35/+"0
# 7
1
=&=J'H / /3"45"#0
#
1
=&=J+H =&=)H / /53+#0
#
!
1
=&+)'H =&>)*H / &**5#4&0
# ,
1
=&=)'H / /#3*#0
3%.2O
I
>
1
2
)
# !
1 =&>>H =&*I+H / *3"&"+"0
# / 1 =&=(+H / /4*5&+0
# 9
1 =&==*H / //&*53#0
# 9 - 1 =&=(=H / /+*&"0
# 1 1 =&=*H / /*//3+"0
# !
1 =&=*>H =&=J=H / /+35"*/0
#
1 =&=()H =&=('H / /"&"+/+0
#
1 # =&'=JH &H / 4/5#0
# 4
1 # =&==*H / //*/**"0
# F
# 1 # =&==>H / //#3#**0
# 1
1 # =&=IH / /&&/450
# 1 # 1 # =&=+H / /##+*&/0
#
4 1 # =&=='H / //3&5&"0
#
1 # =&='+H / /33+*3+0
#
1 # =&=()H / /433"0
#
1 # =&==IH / //+/53/0
#
% =&(JJH =&)>(H / "44&#"*0
#
# % =&=IH / /#+5+40
# % % =&=IJH / /+&"35#0
#
% =&++H =&>)'H / &*345"30
# 4D
# % =&=(+H / /435/*0
#
% =&==)H / //"#5�
# "
? +&)*+H >&))'H & *#+#*3+0
#
D
G ? =&=+H / /#5&0
#
? =&>>+H =&*IJH / *3*4"5"0
# - ? =&=J*H / /3/55430
# -
? =&=JIH / /3&#*"0
#
1 ? =&(+H =&>(H / "55#++0
#
# ? =&=))H / /"34#30
# .
? =&==H / ///**+/0
3%.2O
J
>
1
2
)
# :
D
# ? =&=>>H / /&**45/0
# :
? =&)IH =&*JH / &"*3&&0
# 44 ? =&()H / 3*"&5"0
# C
- ? =&(+IH =&)=(H / "*+5&"/0
# 2
? =&)'H =&I=H / &&"#*/0
# 9- ? =&=+IH =&=>JH / /&4#/�
# 9C
? =&=+H / /*&*30
# 9%
? =&==H / ///3/30
# 9B ? =&==H / ///+*&+0
# 9C
? =&=*=H =&=I)H / /+"/&40
# 9
: ? =&=(H / //"&40
# 9
? =&=(H / //4*(
# 9
? =&==JH / //+44/0
# 1
D
G ? =&=+H / /3*+/0
# %/ - ? =&I'H / &3/#&0
# ? ? =&>=H / "##"/0
#
? =&=('H =&=)>H / /"454"0
# 7 1
? =&==H / ///+"4+0
#
? =&==JH =&==H / //5+/5#0
# 6
? =&==JH / //+**/0
# ? =&>=(H =&*+H / *"#5++0
#
- ? =&=(=H / /+*540
# ? =&=)>H / /"44**0
#
? =&=I)H / /+//#&0
# B
? =&=+H =&(IH / /5"3"0
# 0
9
? =&=++H / /#+"""#0
# #!
&=+>H &(IJH /5+//"0
#
=&=IH / /&&0
# 9
=&=)H / /"***440
# 7
=&=I*H / /+"*&5*0
3%.2O
'
>
1
2
)
# 7
=&'*H / ++**40
# #
=&(=>H =&(>H / ""53"40
# $
7
+&>)+H >&>+IH & 3"5"4+0
# -
7
=&=IH / /&50
# - 7
=&=(H / /3#*0
# -
# 7
=&=(H / //4+3&0
#
# 9
7
=&===H / ///3+0
#
# 7
=&=*IH / /**#+&0
#
7
=&=(H / /3#/*&0
#
7
=&+IH / "/3/5#0
# .C
7
=&=(+H / /"//&##0
# 3
7
=&===H / ///"3&30
# C 7
=&=>H / /&"34"0
# 2
7
=&=>*H / /&*334&0
# 6D
# 7
=&==H / ///544H
# 9
3
7
=&=(H / /3"4&40
# 9Q
7
=&=*)H / /*+3#"0
# 1
7
=&=)(H / /"+/4/40
# 1 D
# 7
=&)IH / #/#&50
# 1
7
=&=+JH =&=>'H / /&43&"#0
# % 7
=&=*H / /#&*&"0
#
. 7
=&=J)H / /+5"&+*0
#
7
=&=I*H / /+"45+"0
#
7
=&=='H / //3+33&0
# 7 1
7
=&=>(H / /&#/450
# 7
7
=&(*JH / ""/+"340
# 6
7
=&==H / //5*4#+0
#
7
=&=((H / /5//5+0
# B
7
=&==JH / //+"*//0
# %!
)&I'IH +&*+>H # 4&+*5530
3%.2O
=
>
1
2
)
#
C
=&=>IH / /&+*#"0
# 3
4 =&)=H / /++44&0
# :
=&=JH / /54/5*/0
# 4
=&=IH / //&0
# 7
=&==JH / //+3+340
# =&I(H =&JJ(H / 3&4+*#/0
# %
-
=&=*H =&)=H / /&30
# C
-
=&=(IH / /""*#**0
# %
-
)&(>'H )&'JIH # #535"&0
#
-
=&==JH / //+++&/0
#
D
# -
=&=(>H / /"/3#+/0
# - / -
=&=>H / /""/*+0
#
-
=&=*+H / /*"*54#0
#
C
-
=&==H / ///+#550
#
-
=&=)H / /"*#&�
# : -
=&(H / /4"/*�
# 4 -
=&==*H / //*/*0
# C
-
=&=)>H / /"4*""0
# C
-
=&==+H / //"4/+0
# 9 9
-
=&=='H / //3550
# 1
-
=&=)'H / /#""/50
# ?
-
=&I'H / &3"4#&0
# 7
-
=&=J+H / /+54&#H
# 7
-
=&=>IH / /&+4*/0
# 7
-
=&=I)H / /+/#"/+0
# -
-
=&IJH / &+55/0
# /#
-
=&==(H / //"+/*0
# ,
-
=&=>(H / /&"&&+/0
# D
-
=&=))H / /"+4&//0
# 0
-
=&=*H / /"533"0
3%.2O
>
1
2
)
# 0D
# -
=&==)H / //"""50
# %
.
>&I=*H *&'J=H * 4#/43&50
#
.
=&(JH / /*/&5*0
#
D
.
=&J'H =&()H / 4+&*+0
#
.
=&=++H / /#*4/4*0
# 3
G .
=&)H / /4##*5"0
# 3
.
=&=*H =&=I+H / /+#/"540
# 3
.
=&+>H / 4""/&0
# 2
- .
=&=+H / /5"5#0
# 91 .
=&=>>H =&=*JH / /*3**4#0
# 9 4 .
=&=((H / /5#40
# %
# .
=&=J=H / /+*+5/50
# ?
.
=&()H / 3*#&"50
# /# .
=&=*(H / /*/&/0
# .
.
&'I>H (&+*H " /*#+40
# 1 .
=&=J'H / /3##5430
# .
=&=))H / /"+5&/0
#
- .
=&=IH / /#5*+&0
# D
.
=&=>(H / /&"*&&0
%
!! :
)&=(*H )&I=(H # &*3+40
# %
& '
6 @
&*J=H (&=>>H 3&+/#440
# 9 6 @
=&=='H / //3*#4&0
# 9
6 @
=&=>)H / /&5&0
# 1 6 @
=&=>+H / /&&#&*&0
# 7
6 @
=&=)H / //&"40
#
6 @
=&))H =&)J)H / #"*+3+0
# # 6 @
=&=J+H / /+4"/&30
# %
"
9
?
=&J*H =&'''H / 5&5&"+0
# # 4 9
?
=&=(+H / /44/*#0
# 9
?
=&=('H / /"&/+5/0
3%.2O
(
>
1
2
)
# 3
7
7
" 9
?
=&=+)H / /#*#&*+0
# 4 - 9
?
=&=IH / /#3550
# 1 -# 9
?
=&=(=H / /+/4""0
# 9
?
9
?
=&=IIH / /+#35&H
# %
1 &=I+H &))H *4*440
# -
1 =&=(H / /+45+/0
# -
1 =&='H / /*"*#30
# .
#
# 1 =&=++H / /#+#55/0
# 3
1 =&=)H / //#45"0
# :
# 1 =&=(=H / /++/0
# C
1 -# 1 =&==+H / //#+#50
# C
1 =&=)H / ///"40
# 1
1 =&=>H / /"+"/40
# 1
1 =&=)H / //*5#+0
#
1 =&=*H / /#/+"*0
# 7/
# 1 =&=>*H / /&+#*0
# - 1 =&=(H / /3"+0
#
1 =&=)H / //555*0
# 1 1 =&=>(H / /&"*5&0
# :
1 =&=+)H / /#*#4�
# %
-
&)(H &)J>H 3+54+50
#
-
=&==H / ///54#50
# 4
-
=&==+H / //"54+40
# 9 -
=&=+IH / /#54#340
# -
-
=&((H / //&**40
# 1
-
=&=>JH / /&34340
# %
(&+=+H (&'+H " &453**#0
#
=&=+H / /"*++0
#
=&==JH / //++5"&0
# 4
#
=&=(>H / /"/"540
3%.2O
)
>
1
2
)
# 9
=&=)H / //###50
# 9 4
=&=)H / //#""/0
# 1
=&=)*H / /"45"/0
# 1 C
=&=>H / /"&+40
# 1
D
/
=&=+H / /##&+/50
#
=&=)'H / /#"#/5/0
# 6
=&('+H =&)*=H / #/*&4+/0
#
=&=*IH / /*&43"#0
#
=&==+H / //#&+0
# #
=&=>)H / /&#&/+40
# %
(
8 =&IJ)H =&'>IH / 5#*#4+0
#
8 =&=(=H / /+540
#
8
8 =&+)H / 5/#&50
# D
#
8 =&=>H / /"+*"*0
# B
8 =&=*)H / /*"/#+0
# %)
&='>H &))'H #5/40
# =&=(+H / /4554+0
# 7
=&(J+H / "##&5&H
# 9
=&==+H / //#44#0
# %
# =&((JH =&(I'H / "#3##4#0
# %
=&I*=H / +"+/34*0
# -
=&=)H / /"*#4/#0
# .
<
=&=*H / /#/5&40
# :
=&='H / /543#30
#
#
=&=(H / /3+5#0
# D
=&'H / /43+&430
# D
G
=&*IH / #3#+&&0
# %
&(JH &+'=H "++"4/0
# C
=&=)(H / /"++4"40
#
=&=JH / /++3*/30
3%.2O
+
>
1
2
)
# 7
=&=+H / /#&/3*40
# 7 =&J+H / *4/3/0
# =&=((H / /5#2
# B
=&=*H / /"4"450
# %
&I((H &5""3#0
#
=&=+H / /#&/"+/0
# 1
=&(IH / 3553*40
# %/
=&==*H / //&+4+&0
# ?
=&=JH / /&**#0
#
=&=>H / /"+*4/0
# 7
=&==H / //5*+440
#
=&=*>H / /*#4++0
# %
=&)=*H =&)I+H / #34*&50
# 0
# =&=I+H / /+/+"&"0
# *)
=&()H =&(*H / ""++*&0
# 7-
=&=+H / /3330
# *
# =&=J(H =&=H / /5**&3+0
# *
=&J='H =&''=H / 5&/4&40
# .
=&=+H / /+4"40
# 3<
=&==+H / //#"&340
# :
=&==)H / //"35340
# 9
#
=&==IH / //*30
#
=&=(H / /35&*0
#
=&=)IH / /#/""3#0
# D
=&=**H / /*&*53"0
# *
=&+J*H =&>'+H / */&3+"0
# +
D (&'(H (&*JH " "35"/0
#
D =&==(H / //"5*0
# :
D =&==(H / //"/"4&0
# 1
D =&==JH / //+3##30
3%.2O
>
>
1
2
)
# ?< D =&>*H =&'=H / +3##50
# C D =&=(H / /3&&*0
# -D" D =&=J>H / /3/"50
#
D =&=+H / /4/3"0
#
D
# D =&=*>H / /*##/�
# ?
D =&=((H / /344/"0
# ,
0 =&)>IH =&+)IH / #3##40
# .
0
=&=>>H / /&*3&30
# B 0
=&=**H / /*&&#"0
# B
0
=&=>JH / /&334/&0
# ,
0
=&(+H =&(*(H / """*+340
# 1#
0
=&=+H / /"/340
.6!7"
-!(6!'!8!!(6' 9%($..,.6%
?*$(=($6
,.
% .
?
??"$
)J+$
27%
?
9
$1.9(J=+$
#
/
&
2
?$@
L,-.2D22?%M$L,-.2D22?%M$
L
?,%39M$
#4
$
$
-
-
"&
L,-.2D22?%ML
?,%39M
-
-
?
3<
7 #;
:$3<
"
4
3
#5
43"&
-
$L,-.2D22?%M#$
G
4
.
$/
#
#
/$
:
#
L
?,%39M&##
L,-.2D22?%M L
?,%39M
L,-.2D22?%;M
:
/
<L37
3%43%??3O
33.?%3
C27.?7>H?,?:C3>HM
L,-.2D22?%;M>H
:
A
#$ /
#
#
L
?,%39M#
9
4
3<:$/
<
#
L37
3%43%??3O
33.>HM
L,-.2D22?%;M
#
&L,-.2D22?%M
##
-
/
/
'>H?
@
>&=(
43
+&=
"
"
1
&
L
?,%39M
##
9
4
3<:4
.
#
&L
?,%39M
##
/
#
#
G&
#4
<
#
-
3<
7
4
3
#5
@
/
& %
#4
#
-
$
-
@
#
#
L,-.2D22?%M$L
?,%39M$ # #&
(
L.3M L,-.2D22?%24%,73-9?
FM
L.3M L
?,%3924%,73-9?
FM
L.3M L?7%3043%37924%,73-9?
FM
TO: Honorable Mayor Parkhurst and Members of the City Council FROM: Leila Regan, City Librarian
REVIEWED BY: Michael Bruckner, City Manager
DATE: August 26, 2025
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION
LETTER FOR THE SIERRA MADRE LIBRARY
FOUNDATION FOR A $50,000 T-MOBILE
HOMETOWN GRANT FOR LIBRARY MEANINGFUL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FURNITURE,
FIXTURES, AND EQUIPMENT.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve and sign the proposed recommendation letter for the Sierra Madre Library Foundation for a T-Mobile Hometown Grant.
ALTERNATIVES
1. City Council can edit the attached recommendation letter for the Sierra Madre Library Foundation for a T-Mobile Hometown Grant.
2. City Council can create a new recommendation letter for the Sierra Madre Library Foundation for a T-Mobile Hometown Grant.
3. City Council can opt not to endorse a recommendation letter for the Sierra Madre Library Foundation for a T-Mobile Hometown Grant.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Sierra Madre Library Foundation's mission is to provide resources for the Sierra Madre Public Library through fundraising, relationship development, grantsmanship and corporate sponsorships. The Foundation works with the community and the to develop, City of Sierra Madre
AGENDA REPORT
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer
furnish and equip a library facility that will provide a 21st century community gathering place to house our library collection, preserve and provide access to our extensive historical archives, and continue to provide a vital space for civic engagement for the next 50 years. The Foundation is a teram of volunteers from the Sierra Madre community who wish to raise support for the many resources the library provides to our community.
The Foundation is applying for a T-Mobile Hometown Grant. T-Mobile is committing up to $25 million through 2026 to support small towns, villages, and territories throughout the United States by funding community projects through these grants.
Applying for a $50,000 T-Mobile Hometown Grant will help support furniture, fixtures, and equipment for the renovated library building located at 440 W. Sierra Madre Blvd.
ANALYSIS
The Sierra Madre Public Library has received two state grants to renovate the 1955 Sierra Madre Public Library building. The Targeted State Grant was for $10,000,000 and the Building Froward Infrastructure Grant matched with federal American Rescue Plan Act funds added $669,210 to retrofit the building for seismic, bring the building up to ADA standards, improve resiliency and sustainability, a 5,000 sq.ft. expansion, and improve surrounding green space. The listed state and federal funds cover the structural needs, but do not cover anything for furniture, fixtures, or equipment (FF&E). Items like shelving, desks, chairs, etc. are not included in the aforementioned grants.
The Friends of the Sierra Madre Library and the Sierra Madre Library Foundation have dedicated their non-profit organizations to funding FF&E for the Library Meaningful Improvement Project. The Friends of the Sierra Madre Library have dedicated $695,000 total toward FF&E. The Sierra Madre Library Foundation is trying to match that funding and have experienced success with grant applications in the past. This includes applying for a $50,000 T-Mobile Hometown Grant.
The T-Mobile Hometown Grant application process includes providing:
• Project plan proposal with a detailed budget and timeline • Up to 5 letters of support from stakeholders in the community • Examples of in-kind donation possibilities/additional funding to cover the remainder of the project
• Details on permits needed or already obtained
The recommendation letter is one of the letters of support to be able to apply for this grant.
ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA)
Not Applicable
STRATEGIC PLAN CORRELATION
Strategy IG 1.3 - Library Renovation
- Help furnish the renovated public library.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund or other City resources as a result of approving the recommendation letter. The $50,000 T-Mobile Hometown Grant, if awarded, will be administered by the Sierra Madre Library Foundation and applied exclusively toward furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FF&E) for the renovated Library facility at 440 W. Sierra Madre Blvd.
This grant opportunity supplements the broader funding plan for the Library Meaningful Improvement Project, which has already secured approximately $10.7 million in state and federal funding for structural, seismic, ADA, sustainability, and green space improvements. However, those funds cannot be used for FF&E. Community partners, including the Friends of the Sierra Madre Library ($695,000 committed) and the Library Foundation (active fundraising and grant-seeking), are working to fully fund FF&E needs.
By supporting the Foundation’s application for the T-Mobile Hometown Grant, the City helps leverage outside resources to reduce reliance on local fundraising and ensures the Library project is delivered as a fully functional, modernized community facility.
PUBLIC NOTICE
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies of this report can be accessed on the City’s website at sierramadreca.gov.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. City Council Recommendation Letter for the Sierra Madre Library Foundation for a $50,000 T-Mobile Hometown Grants.
DELIVERY VIA T-MOBILE GRANT PORTAL
August 1, 2025
Dear T-Mobile Hometown Grant Committee,
As members of the City Council for the City of Sierra Madre, we are proud to offer our full support for the Sierra Madre Library Foundation’s application for a $50,000 T-Mobile Hometown Grant.
Sierra Madre is a small but vibrant community, nestled at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains. With just over 11,000 residents and covering only 3.01 square miles, we are a close-knit town with deep roots - founded in the late 1800s and proud of our strong tradition of civic engagement, education, and cultural preservation.
At the heart of our town stands the Sierra Madre Public Library - our one and only library, serving not just our residents but also families and students from surrounding communities. Local schools, preschools, and homeschool groups regularly visit for story times, educational programs, research support, and early childhood literacy activities.
Our library is a cornerstone of learning and community connection for people of all ages.
We are in the midst of a transformational renovation and expansion of this treasured institution - one that will signiğcantly enhance the way our community connects, learns, and grows together.
With more than $10 million in state and federal grant funding secured, the project will expand the library by 5,000 square feet, introduce Sierra Madre’s ğrst-ever Community Room, and bring the building up to modern standards for accessibility, safety, and environmental sustainability. It will also include a dedicated, temperature-controlled Historical Archives Room to preserve and showcase Sierra Madre’s extensive collection of archival materials - an invaluable resource for researchers, students, and residents alike.
These upgrades will empower the library to better serve our entire community with more inclusive programming, public gathering space, and cultural enrichment for generations to come.
However, these public funds do not cover Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E) - essential elements like bookshelves, seating, educational technology, and Community Room furnishings. These are the pieces that will bring the new library to life.
The Sierra Madre Library Foundation, in partnership with the Friends of the Library, has already raised over $1 million toward the $1.5 million needed to fully furnish the space.
A $50,000 T-Mobile Hometown Grant would help close this ğnal gap and ensure that when the library reopens in June 2026, it will be ready to welcome and serve generations to come.
Thank you for considering this opportunity to support a truly meaningful project in a small town with a big heart.
Sincerely,
Sierra Madre City Council
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Christine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
TO: Mayor Parkhurst and Members of the City Council
FROM: Laura M. Aguilar, City Clerk
REVIEWED BY: Michael Bruckner, City Manager
DATE: August 26, 2025
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO THE SENIOR
COMMUNITY COMMISSION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council review all applications and consider appointing an applicant to fill the unscheduled vacancy, and two additional applicants to serve a four-year term from July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2029.
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may:
1. Appoint one or two applicants and direct staff to continue soliciting applications to fill the remaining vacant seat; or
2. Appoint three applicants to fill the vacant seats; or
3. Direct staff to continue soliciting applications and return to a future meeting with additional applications.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Senior Community Commission is a five-member body that meets on the first Thursday of each month. Scheduled vacancies occurred when Commissioners Krok and Enmark completed their second full-term on June 30, 2025, leaving two vacancies on the Commission. An unscheduled vacancy occurred with the resignation of Commissioner Pergola on August 8, 2025.
The City Clerk’s Office initially solicited applications for the two seats utilizing several methods and received two applications prior to the end of the fiscal year. At the June 24, 2025, City Council Meeting, the City Council directed staff to continue efforts to collect applications, and return to a future meeting. As result of continued recruitment efforts, the City has received seven (7) applications for the three vacancies.
City of Sierra Madre
AGENDA REPORT
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer
ANALYSIS
The Senior Community Commission is a five-member body that meets the first Thursday of each month. The purpose of the Commission is to advise the City Council on the welfare and well-being of older residents by:
x Assessing and defining their needs;
x Locating and publicizing available resources
x Coordinating and initiating services and opportunities for older residents, such as hot meals;
x Informing the community of the needs of older residents and suggesting ways to participate in creating solutions to those problems; and x Monitoring expenses and revenues directly relating to senior programming and services.
Along with the listed advisory duties, the Commission hosts and organizes several events throughout the year, with assistance from City staff. These events include the Older American, Community Yard Sale, one summer concert, Lunch & Learn workshops, Bingo, recreational classes, and a number of social events intended to promote inclusivity and reduce isolation among our senior population.
The City Council is asked to review the applications and consider filling the seat vacated by Commissioner Pergola, ending June 30, 2026; and the two full-term seats ending June 30, 2029. The following applications were received by the deadline (alphabetical order):
x Teresa Chaure
x Peter Diedrich
x Ellen Fiol
x Eric Friedman
x Andrew Heller
x Mia Khadour
x Rose Marie Toliver
All applicants were notified that the City Council was scheduled to discuss filling the current vacancies at this evening’s meeting. Applicants were encouraged to attend the Council meeting, if able.
ENVIRONMENTAL(CEQA)
The action proposed herein is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 21065 of CEQA and State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15378. The appointment of members to the commission is an organizational and administrative action that would not cause either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.
Therefore, the proposed action is not a "project" subject to CEQA, as defined in Section 21065 of CEQA and Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Since the action is not a project subject to CEQA, no environmental document is required.
STRATEGIC PLAN CORRELATION
The appointment of commissioners and board members aligns with Council’s values for collaboration, and as described in Goal 4 - Community Enrichment of the Strategic Plan. Initiative CE 4.2.3; Foster Collaboration Between Residents and Businesses. - This initiative aims to strengthen partnerships between residents and local businesses to address community challenges, support economic development, and enhance sustainability. Through collaborative efforts, such as joint programs, events, and mutual support, the initiative seeks to create a thriving, interconnected community where both residents and businesses work together for shared success.
FISCAL IMPACT
The appointment of commissioners to the Senior Community Commission will not result in any direct fiscal impact to the City. Commission service is voluntary, and no stipends or additional staffing costs are associated with these appointments; however, failure to appoint commissioners could have indirect financial consequences. Without a quorum, the Commission would be unable to meet, delaying program oversight and potentially impacting planning and delivery of senior services. In such a scenario, staff resources may be required to assume a greater role in coordinating activities traditionally supported by the Commission.
By filling the current vacancies, the City ensures continuity in senior programming and event planning, while maintaining a cost-neutral structure for commission operations.
PUBLIC NOTICE
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies of this report can be accessed on the City’s website at sierramadreca.gov.
TO: Honorable Mayor Parkhurst and Members of the City Council FROM: James Carlson, Senior Analyst
Eric Lozick, Management Analyst
REVIEWED BY: Michael Bruckner, City Manager
Arnulfo Yanez, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 26, 2025
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SURVEYS AND TRAFFIC STUDIES REPORTS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve recommendations contained within the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report (“Traffic Surveys”) with the exception of raising the speed limit on E. Sierra Madre Blvd. and the Traffic Study and On-Street Parking Management Plan on West Grand View Avenue (“Traffic Studies”).
ALTERNATIVES
1. The City Council provide additional recommendations to the Traffic Surveys and/or Traffic Studies.
2. The City Council direct staff to provide additional information.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City has contracted with Willdan Services to conduct two traffic related analysis. The Traffic Surveys are required to be done every 7 years for speed enforcement. The Traffic Studies have been conducted at the request of the City Council.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the recommendations of the Traffic Surveys, with the exception of raising the speed limit on E. Sierra Madre Blvd from 25 mph to 30 mph, and direct staff to enact the associated traffic control measures.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the recommendations of the Traffic Studies and direct staff to enact the associated traffic control measures.
City of Sierra Madre
AGENDA REPORT
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer
ANALYSIS
In March of 2025, the City of Sierra Madre issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Traffic Surveys and Traffic Studies. Three proposals were received as follows:
1. Willdan Engineering - $40,100
2. Transtech Engineers - $61,800
3. Fehr & Peers - $65,840
Each of the proposals were responsive and complete and the contract was awarded to the lowest bidder, Willdan Engineering. The Final 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report with associated 2025 ADT Data is attached to this report. The Final Traffic Study and On-Street Parking Management Plan on West Grand View Avenue are also attached.
TRAFFIC SURVEYS
The following locations were included in the surveys. They represent the same locations as previous studies (Woodland Drive was added most recently).
ID STREET SEGMENT
1 N. Baldwin Ave Highland Ave to Carter Ave
2 N. Baldwin Ave Sierra Madre Blvd to Highland Ave
3 S. Baldwin Ave Sierra Madre Blvd to Orange Grove Ave
4 E. Grand View Ave N. Baldwin Ave to Santa Anita Ave
5 W. Grand View Ave N. Baldwin Ave to Michillinda Ave
6 E. Highland Ave N. Baldwin Ave to N. Canon Ave
7 W. Highland Ave N. Baldwin Ave to Michillinda Ave
8 N. Lima St W. Sierra Madre Blvd to W. Carter Ave
9 S. Lima St W. Sierra Madre Blvd to W. Orange Grove Ave 10 S. Michillinda Ave W. Orange Grove Ave to W. Sierra Madre Blvd 11 N. Michillinda Ave W. Sierra Madre Blvd to North City Limit 12 N. Mountain Trail Ave E. Sierra Madre Blvd to E. Mira Monte Ave 13 S. Mountain Trail Ave E. Sierra Madre Blvd to E. Orange Grove Ave 14 E. Orange Grove Ave S. Baldwin Ave to East City Limit 15 W. Orange Grove Ave S. Baldwin Ave to S. Michillinda Ave 16 Santa Anita Ave E. Grandview Ave to Arno Dry
17 W. Sierra Madre Blvd Baldwin Ave to Lima St
18 E. Sierra Madre Blvd Baldwin Ave to East City Limit
19 W. Sierra Madre Blvd Lima St to Michillinda Ave
20 N. Sunnyside Ave W. Sierra Madre Blvd to North City Limit 21 S. Sunnyside Ave W. Sierra Madre Blvd to W. Orange Grove Ave 22 Woodland Drive Sturtevant Drive to North City Limit
Recommendations from these studies include the following:
E. Highland Ave. (entirety) – Reduce posted speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph W. Highland Ave. (entirety) – Reduce posted speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph W. Sierra Madre Blvd. (Lima St. to Baldwin Ave) – Reduce posted speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph E. Sierra Madre Blvd. (entirety) – Raise posted speed limit from 25 mph to 30 mph Staff is recommending that the City Council decline to enact the recommendation to raise the posted speed limit on E. Sierra Madre Blvd. Staff recognizes the community concern for school pedestrian traffic at E. Sierra Madre Blvd and N. Canon Ave and youth pedestrian traffic at Sierra Vista Park. A formal designation of a “Safety Corridor” may be required in the future for this section and may be brought back to City Council, as necessary.
TRAFFIC STUDIES
The City Council provided the following intersections for specific traffic studies:
ID SEGMENT RECOMMENDATION
1 Fairview Ave and N. Sunnyside Ave No change
2 S. Sunnyside Ave and Mariposa Ave
Move the stop signs from S. Sunnyside Ave.,
to Mariposa Ave.
3 N. Michillinda Ave and W. Grand View Ave No Change
4 E. Grand View Ave and N. Canon Ave.
Improve visibility of existing crosswalk and
bring corners up to current ADA standards.
5 W. Grand View Ave and Wilson St No Change
6 W. Highland Ave and N. Michillinda Ave No Change
The City Council also provided an additional request to study the parking situation on W. Grand View Ave. which was included in the study. The report recommends implementing peak hour parking restrictions, specifically “No Parking” on the south side of W. Grand View from N. Baldwin Ave to N.
Michillinda Ave. The “No Parking” would be in effect during the hours of 7:00am to 10:00am and 2:00pm to 5:00pm.
ENVIRONMENTAL(CEQA)
Minor traffic control adjustments are generally exempt from CEQA under section 14 CCR 15061(b)(3).
STRATEGIC PLAN CORRELATION
This report and staff recommendation is consistent with the following Sierra Madre Strategic Plan efforts:
Objective 2.4: “Develop and Implement a Safe Streets Initiative”.
Initiative PS 2.4.1: “Optimize Traffic Flow and Management” Project PS 2.4.1 A: “Development of Circulation Plan
Project PS 2.4.1 B: Traffic Survey for Major Streets
Project PS 2.4.1 C: Traffic Study for Selected Intersections
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of preparing the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report and the associated Traffic Studies, including the On-Street Parking Management Plan, is $40,100. This expense will be funded through the City’s allocation of Measure R Local Return. Specifically, the appropriation will be charged to Fund 38007 – Measure R, Segment 83500 – Street Maintenance, Object of Expenditure 56010 – Improvements Other Than Buildings (38007.83500.56010). No General Fund resources are required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTICE
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies of this report can be accessed on the City’s website at www.sierramadre.ca.gov ATTACHMENTS:
1. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
2. 2025 ADT Data
3. Traffic Study and On-Street Parking Management Plan on West Grand View Ave. 2025 Engineering and
Traffic Survey Report
August 2025
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
August 6, 2025
James Carlson
Senior Analyst
City of Sierra Madre
232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd
Sierra Madre, CA 91024
Subject: Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) - 2025
Dear Mr. Carlson:
As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) to justify and update the posted speed limits along 22 street segments in the City of Sierra Madre. These segments were last surveyed in 2016 and require an update to comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).
We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&TS procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City’s arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices.
The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Revision 8 (California MUTCD) dated January 2024, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement.
We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Sierra Madre and the assistance, cooperation, and guidance afforded to us during the course of this study.
Very truly yours,
WILLDAN
Nicolle Spann, P.E., T.E.
Traffic Engineer
Enclosure
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Table of Contents
Introduction........................................................................................................3 Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey....................................................................................... 4 Speed Sampling...................................................................................................................................... 4 Crash History.......................................................................................................................................... 6 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists...................................................................................... 6 Survey Conditions ...............................................................................................6 Survey Locations........................................................................................................................................ 6 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Speed Data............................................................................................................................................. 6 Field Review Data .................................................................................................................................. 7 Crash Data ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Analysis ..............................................................................................................7 Criteria....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Results and Engineering and Traffic Survey Recommendations............................................................... 8 Speed Limit Recommendations...........................................................................8 Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits............................................................................... 9 Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes..........................................................12 Segments with Special Conditions.....................................................................13
APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data
APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms
APPENDIX C
Survey Equipment
APPENDIX D
Legislative References
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
3 Introduction
This E&TS is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Sierra Madre. This E&TS presents recommended speed limits for 22 street segments in the City of Sierra Madre. E&T Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local, major, secondary, collector, and arterial streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. Historically, these surveys must be updated every 7 to 14 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions, and can be enforced per CVC Section 40802.
E&T Surveys are prepared under the direction of CVC Sections 627,22350-22359, and 40801-40803. The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by the California MUTCD Revision 8 (California MUTCD) dated January 2024.
Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43), signed in October 2021, has given local agencies more leeway in lowering and maintaining speed limits aimed at enhancing traffic safety. The California Vehicle Code was amended in 2022 and the California MUTCD was amended in March 2023 to implement laws and guidelines with the changes set forth in AB 43. There were three major changes to how speed limits can be recommended under AB 43 as follows:
1. An E&T Survey conducted more than 7 years ago may be extended to 14 years (previously to 10 years) if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)].
2. A local authority may establish and designate safety corridors throughout their jurisdiction. The local authority may recommend a speed limit with an additional five mile per hour reduction on segments designated as safety corridors. Local authorities may not lower a speed limit under this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide, whichever is sooner. Since the E&TS was completed in March 2025, this report reflects lowering speeds on these designating the roadway segments.
3. If a local authority, after completing an E&T Survey, finds that the speed limit is still reasonable or safe, the local authority may retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
This E&TS was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Police Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require E&T Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City’s Police Department(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)].
Posted speed limits are primarily established to protect the public by mitigating the risks posed by reckless and unpredictable driving behavior. The posted speed limits provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
4 reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.
The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually conducted to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.
Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.
The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California MUTCD and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes three elements of an E&T Survey:
1. Measurement of prevailing speed based on the 85th percentile rule
2. Accident history on the roadway
3. Roadway conditions and other relevant factors that are not readily apparent to the motorist.
Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.
Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey
The California MUTCD specifies the methodology to be used for completing E&T Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the E&TS are discussed in more detail as follows:
Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. A speed limit is established in the three options below.
Options:
Closest to 85th Percentile Speed – A speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
5 California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by an additional 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. California MUTCD Option 2 - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85thpercentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b).
If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&T Survey shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:
If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, the 3 options may be applied as follows:
Closest to 85th Percentile Speed - The 85th percentile speed would round up to the nearest 5- mph increment. The speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed.
California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - The first step is to round up, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&T Survey. However, it is best to apply MUTCD Option 2 in these scenarios as it will not require documentation of conditions and justification to lower the speed limit.
California MUTCD Option 2 - Instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied.
If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, the 3 options may be applied as follows:
Closest to 85th Percentile Speed - The 85th percentile speed would round down to the nearest 5- mph increment. The speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed.
California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - The first step is to round down, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&T Survey.
California MUTCD Option 2 – This option is not applicable to 85th percentile speeds that already round down to the nearest 5-mph increment using the “Closest to 85th Percentile Speed” option. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
6 Crash History
Reported crashes reviewed from California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than expected average rate of crashes. A segment that has an above-average crash rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph below the basic speed limit.
The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning.
Conditions not readily apparent to motorists include the considerations of crash history, poor visibility, and the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians.
Survey Conditions
Survey Locations
The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Sierra Madre. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following:
1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.
2. Minimum visibility restrictions.
3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.
4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.
Data Collection
Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic crashes, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. ADT and field reviews were conducted at 22 locations during the month of May 2025.
Speed Data
Radar speed measurements were conducted at 22 locations during the month of May 2025. The radar speed distribution forms are in Appendix B. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
7 Field Review Data
A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors:
1. Street width and alignment;
2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics;
3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;
4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;
5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;
6. Visibility obstructions;
7. Land use and proximity to schools;
8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage;
9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and
10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.
Crash Data
Crash data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database. For this study, crash data was used from the latest 2 years of reported accidents from April 1, 2021 to March 31, 2024. The crash rates for the 22 segments are expressed in crashes per million vehicle miles (C/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the crash rate:
ࡾൌ ൈ ǡ ǡ
࢙࢟ࢇࢊ ൈ ࢚
࢜ൈൈ ࢘ࢇࢋ࢟
= Number of midblock crashes over time period
= Crash Rate (crashes/million vehicle miles)
= Time Period Covered (in years)
= Length of Segment (miles)
= Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
The segment crash rate was then compared to the average statewide crash rate of similar roadways.
The average statewide crash rates were obtained from 2022 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans.
Analysis
Criteria
Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California MUTCD. Some of the criteria used are:
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
8 A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The “basic speed limit” is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed.
B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed.
C. The crash rate for each street segment is compared to average crash rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average crash rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Pinole.
Results and Engineering and Traffic Survey Recommendations The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed based on the guidelines for an Engineering and Traffic Survey set forth by the California MUTCD and the CVC. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 1. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements.
Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a crash rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report.
The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions.
Speed Limit Recommendations
The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.
Table 1 summarizes the data collected and recommended speed limit for each segment in this E&T Survey.
Table 2 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limit.
Table 1 - Summary of Recommendations
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate*
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
Pace Act.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit Comments No.
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Baldwin Ave Carter Ave Highland Ave 2,095 31 1.68 23-32 0.00 0.43 80 Closest to 85th Speed 30** 30** 1 %Baldwin Ave Highland Ave Sierra Madre Blvd
6,114 27 1.68 19-28 0.00 0.15 83 Closest to 85th Speed 25** 25** 2 % Grand View Ave Michillinda Ave Baldwin Ave 4,217 34 1.68 24-33 0.00 0.89 65 California MUTCD Option 2 30** 30** 3 %Grand View Ave Baldwin Ave Santa Anita Ave 3,774 32 1.68 23-32 0.13 1.16 72 Closest to 85th Speed 30** 30** 4 %Baldwin Ave Sierra Madre Blvd Orange Grove Ave
9,334 36 1.68 29-38 0.00 0.32 79 Closest to 85th Speed 35 35 5 % Highland Ave Michillinda Ave Baldwin Ave 2,576 28 1.68 19-28 0.00 0.89 79 California MUTCD Option 2 25** 30** 6 %Highland Ave Baldwin Ave Canon Ave 880 29 1.68 20-29 0.00 0.42 80 California MUTCD Option 2 25** 30** 7 %Lima St Carter Ave Sierra Madre Blvd
1,541 30 1.68 22-31 0.00 0.6 74 Closest to 85th Speed 30 30 8 % Lima St Sierra Madre Blvd Orange Grove
Ave
2,554 34 1.68 24-33 0.00 0.33 72 California MUTCD Option 2 30 30 9 % *Collision rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle MilesAct.: Actual Collision RateExp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate 9 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report Table 1 - Summary of Recommendations
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate*
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
Pace Act.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit Comments No.
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Michillinda Ave North City Limit Sierra Madre
Blvd
5,303 36 1.68 27-36 0.00 0.76 67 Closest to 85th Speed 35** 35** 10 % Michillinda Ave Sierra Madre Blvd Orange Grove
Ave
14,622 36 1.68 27-36 0.00 0.32 70 Closest to 85th Speed 35** 35** 11 % Mountain Trail Ave
Mira Monte Ave Sierra Madre
Blvd
2,681 31 1.68 21-30 0.00 0.5 70 Closest to 85th Speed 30 30 12 % Mountain Trail Ave
Sierra Madre Blvd Orange Grove
Ave
4,349 32 1.68 23-32 0.00 0.32 74 Closest to 85th Speed 30 30 13 % Orange Grove Ave
Machillinda Ave Baldwin Ave 8,214 37 1.68 26-35 0.08 0.85 71 Closest to 85th Speed 35 35 14 % Orange Grove Ave
Baldwin Ave East City Limit 5,763 39 1.68 29-38 0.00 0.83 71 California MUTCD Option 2 35 35 15 % Santa Anita Ave Arno Dr Grand View Ave 1,115 34 1.68 26-35 0.00 0.3 63 California MUTCD Option 2 30 30 16 %Sierra Madre Blvd Michillinda Ave Lima St 8,686 33 1.68 24-33 0.00 0.81 76 California MUTCD Option 2 30 30 17 % Sierra Madre Blvd
Lima St Baldwin Ave 8,843 27 1.68 18-27 0.00 0.46 82 Closest to 85th Speed 25 30 18 % *Collision rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle MilesAct.: Actual Collision RateExp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate 10 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report Table 1 - Summary of Recommendations
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate*
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
Pace Act.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit Comments No.
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Sierra Madre Blvd
Baldwin Ave East City Limit 6,689 34 1.68 26-35 0.21 0.39 74 California MUTCD Option 2 30 25 19 % Sunnyside Ave North City Limit Sierra Madre
Blvd
959 30 1.68 20-29 0.00 0.61 74 Closest to 85th Speed 30 30 20 % Sunnyside Ave Sierra Madre Blvd Orange Grove
Ave
1,139 29 1.68 19-28 0.00 0.33 75 Closest to 85th Speed 30 30 21 % Woodland Dr North City Limit Sturtevant Dr 739 22 1.68 15-24 0.00 0.43 56 Residential Density, Hidden Driveways
15 15 22 %
*Collision rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle MilesAct.: Actual Collision RateExp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate 11 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes No. Street From To Existing New Change
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
6 Highland Ave Michillinda Ave Baldwin Ave 30 25 - 5
7 Highland Ave Baldwin Ave Canon Ave 30 25 - 5
18 Sierra Madre Blvd Lima St Baldwin Ave 30 25 - 5
19 Sierra Madre Blvd Baldwin Ave East City Limit 25 30 + 5 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 12
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
13 Segments with Special Conditions
This section is meant to further explain the use of special conditions to lower the recommended speed limit lower than the 85th Percentile speed. These special conditions include the following:
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Residential Districts
Land or Facilities that Generate High Concentrations of Pedestrians Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more above or below the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
Each segment is discussed below.
Segment 22 – Woodland Drive – North City Limit to Sturtevant Drive This segment is currently posted at 15 mph and has one lane in each direction with an ADT of 739 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.43-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 22 mph and would normally justify a 20 mph posted speed limit. However, due to residential density with hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 15 mph for the above reason. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 1
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:14 AM
85th Percentile Speed 31
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.43
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, Church
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 2095
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Highland, Grand View, Uncontrolled @ Laurel, Algeria Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Baldwin Ave
FROM Carter Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Highland Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Carter, Grand View, Highland
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 1582
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 2
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:24 AM
85th Percentile Speed 27
50th Percentile Speed 23
10 mph Pace 19-28
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.15
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 25
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 6114
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lanes
Marked X-Walks @ Sierra Madre, Highland, Uncontrolled @ Montecito, Kersting Ct Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Baldwin Ave
FROM Highland Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sierra Madre Blvd
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre, Highland
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 5086
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 3
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/22/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:57 PM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 29
10 mph Pace 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.89
Sidewalks South Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 34
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 4217
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Baldwin, Auburn, Lima, Uncontrolled @ Olive Tree Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Grand View Ave
FROM Michillinda Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Baldwin Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting North Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Baldwin, Auburn, Lima, Sunnyside, Michillinda Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 2410
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 4
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/22/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:55 PM
85th Percentile Speed 32
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.13
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 1.16
Sidewalks South Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, Church
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 3774
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Mountain Trail, Baldwin, Uncontrolled @ Canon Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Grand View Ave
FROM Baldwin Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Santa Anita Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Great
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Santa Anita, Mountain Trail, Baldwin Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 2416
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 5
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.32
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 9334
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lanes
Marked X-Walks @ Sierra Madre, Uncontrolled @ Mariposa
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Baldwin Ave
FROM Sierra Madre Blvd
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Orange Grove Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre Blvd, Orange Grove Ave Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 8363
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 6
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:26 PM
85th Percentile Speed 28
50th Percentile Speed 24
10 mph Pace 19-28
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.89
Sidewalks South Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 38
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 25
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 2576
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Baldwin, Auburn, Uncontrolled @ Hermosa Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Highland Ave
FROM Michillinda Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Baldwin Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides, Few
Traffic Control Stop @ Baldwin, Auburn, Lima, Sunnyside, Michillinda Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 1561
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 7
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:23 AM
85th Percentile Speed 29
50th Percentile Speed 26
10 mph Pace 20-29
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.42
Sidewalks South Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 37
Adjacent Land Use School, Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 25
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 149
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 880
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Baldwin, Canon, Uncontrolled @ Hermosa Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Highland Ave
FROM Baldwin Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Canon Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting North Side, Few
Traffic Control Stop @ Baldwin, Mountain Trail, Canon
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 251
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 8
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:51 PM
85th Percentile Speed 30
50th Percentile Speed 26
10 mph Pace 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.60
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Trailhead, Church
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 1541
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Highland, Sierra Madre
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Lima St
FROM Carter Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sierra Madre Blvd
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Carter, Grand View, Highland, Sierra Madre Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 1132
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 9
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:01 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 28
10 mph Pace 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.33
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 2554
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Sierra Madre
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Lima St
FROM Sierra Madre Blvd
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Orange Grove Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre, Orange Grove
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 1947
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 10
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/22/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:35 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.76
Sidewalks Both Sides, West Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 48
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 5303
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ TS
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Michillinda Ave
FROM North City Limit
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sierra Madre Blvd
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control TS @ Sierra Madre
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 3996
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 11
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/22/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:02 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.32
Sidewalks West Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 48
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 14622
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ TS
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Michillinda Ave
FROM Sierra Madre Blvd
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Orange Grove Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control TS @ Sierra Madre, Orange Grove
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 10853
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 12
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 3:16 PM
85th Percentile Speed 31
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 21-30
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.50
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 2681
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Stop
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Mountain Trail Ave
FROM Mira Monte Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sierra Madre Blvd
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre, Highland, Grand View Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 2219
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 13
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:00 PM
85th Percentile Speed 32
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.32
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 45
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 4349
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Sierra Madre
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Mountain Trail Ave
FROM Sierra Madre Blvd
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Orange Grove Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre, Orange Grove
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 3394
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 14
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:32 PM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.08
On-Street Parking None
Segment Length 0.85
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 34
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 8214
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @TS
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Orange Grove Ave
FROM Machillinda Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Baldwin Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting South Side, Few
Traffic Control Stop @ Baldwin, TS @ Michillinda
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 3443
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 15
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:21 PM
85th Percentile Speed 39
50th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.83
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 35-38
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 5763
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks None
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Orange Grove Ave
FROM Baldwin Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
East City Limit
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting None
Traffic Control Stop @ Orange Grove Ave, Michillinda Ave Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 5557
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 16
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/19/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:43 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 28
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking West Side
Segment Length 0.30
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 78
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 99
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 1115
Number of Lanes 2, Raised Median Separating Grade
Marked X-Walks None
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Santa Anita Ave
FROM Arno Dr
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Grand View Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Grand View
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 1978
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 17
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:20 AM
85th Percentile Speed 33
50th Percentile Speed 28
10 mph Pace 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.81
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 45
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 8686
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @Stop, Uncontrolled @ Canon, Coburn
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Sierra Madre Blvd
FROM Michillinda Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Lima St
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Lima, Sunnyside, Michillinda
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 6491
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 18
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:40 AM
85th Percentile Speed 27
50th Percentile Speed 23
10 mph Pace 18-27
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.46
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Library, Commercial
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 25
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 8843
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lanes
Marked X-Walks @ TS, Sunnyside, Uncontrolled @ Park
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Sierra Madre Blvd
FROM Lima St
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Baldwin Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Modreate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control TS @ Michillinda, Stop @ Sunnyside, Lima Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 6652
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 19
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.21
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.39
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Fire Station
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 6689
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Stop, Uncontrolled @ Hermosa, Auburn, Windsor, Kersting Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Sierra Madre Blvd
FROM Baldwin Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
East City Limit
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Lima, Baldwin
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 4754
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 20
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/19/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:51 PM
85th Percentile Speed 30
50th Percentile Speed 25
10 mph Pace 20-29
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.61
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 116
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 959
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Sierra Madre
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Sunnyside Ave
FROM North City Limit
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sierra Madre Blvd
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre, Highland, Grand View Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 528
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 21
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/22/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:53 AM
85th Percentile Speed 29
50th Percentile Speed 23
10 mph Pace 19-28
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.33
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 35
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 120
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 1139
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks None
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Sunnyside Ave
FROM Sierra Madre Blvd
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Orange Grove Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Orange Grove, Mariposa, Sierra Madre Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 747
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 22
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/19/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:31 AM
85th Percentile Speed 22
50th Percentile Speed 20
10 mph Pace 15-24
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 56
Posted Speed Limit 15
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.43
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 18-20
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By DK Checked By NS
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph
CRASH HISTORY
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 15
Residential Density, Hidden Driveways
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 61
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 739
Number of Lanes 1-2
Marked X-Walks None
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Woodland Dr
FROM North City Limit
CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sturtevant Dr
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting None
Traffic Control Stop @ Sturtevant
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 596
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:14AM 11:17AM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HIGHLAND AVE AND CARTER AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 257 BALDWIN AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 30 31 31 M.P.H.39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 27 27 27 M.P.H.37 X 10 136 00 0 15TH %: 22 23 23 M.P.H.35 X 01 1 *34 X X X X 13 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 20 - 29 23 - 32 M.P.H.33 X X X X X 23 5 *32 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 P % IN PACE: 81% 81% 80%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 C % OVER PACE: 4% 18% 6%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 1% 14%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12 25 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 27 27 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 1324 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 14 1423 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 1222 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X X X 27 920 X X X X X X X 43 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.15 0.0719 X X 20 218 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.39 0.26 M.P.H.17 X 01 116 00 015 00 0 100 100 200
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
BALDWIN AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:24AM 10:11AM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND HIGHLAND AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 94 BALDWIN AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 27 27 27 M.P.H.39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 23 24 23 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 19 20 20 M.P.H.35 00 0 *34 X 01 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 19 - 28 20 - 29 19 - 28 M.P.H.33 X 01 1 *32 X X X X 13 4 P % IN PACE: 80% 86% 83%31 X X X 21 3 A30 X X X X 04 4 C % OVER PACE: 9% 6% 10%29 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 E28 X X X X X X 42 6 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 7% 7%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 *26 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 24 24 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 2124 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9 21 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 13 1323 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 13 2322 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 1520 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.13 0.0719 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 1418 X X X X X X 42 6 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.36 0.26 M.P.H.17 X X X X X X 51 616 X X 20 215 00 0 100 100 200
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
BALDWIN AVENUE
DATE: 05/22/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 12:57PM 1:50PM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND MICHILLINDA AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 520 GRANDVIEW AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 X 10 146 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND42 X 10 141 X 01 140 X 01 1 85TH %: 33 35 34 M.P.H.39 X 01 138 X X 11 2 50TH %: 27 29 29 M.P.H.37 X X X X 13 436 X X X 03 3 15TH %: 22 23 23 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 *34 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 *32 X X X X X X X X X 36 9 P % IN PACE: 70% 62% 65%31 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 C % OVER PACE: 21% 23% 18%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 15% 17%27 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 3 13 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 29 28 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 1324 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 31 2923 X X X X X X X 34 722 X X X X X X X X 62 8 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.21 X X X 21 320 X X X X X 41 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.33 0.1419 X 01 118 X X X X X 32 5 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.58 0.38 M.P.H.17 X X X 03 316 00 015 00 0 100 100 200
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
GRANDVIEW AVENUE
DATE: 05/22/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 1:55PM 3:11PM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND SANTA ANITA AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 92 GRANDVIEW AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND42 00 041 X 10 140 X X 11 2 85TH %: 33 32 32 M.P.H.39 X 10 138 X X 20 2 50TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H.37 00 036 X X X 21 3 15TH %: 23 21 22 M.P.H.35 X X X 30 3 *34 X X X X 22 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 20 - 29 23 - 32 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X 43 7 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 P % IN PACE: 70% 76% 72%31 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 C % OVER PACE: 16% 16% 12%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 8% 16%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 13 19 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 26 27 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 1424 X X X X X X X 34 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 30 21 2623 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 1522 X X X X X 23 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X 34 720 X X X X X 23 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.30 0.23 0.1319 X X X X 13 418 X 10 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.48 0.36 M.P.H.17 X X 11 216 X X 20 215 X X X X X 23 5 100 100 200
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
GRANDVIEW AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:21AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 182 BALDWIN AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 X X 20 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X 10 141 00 040 X 01 1 85TH %: 37 36 36 M.P.H.39 X 10 138 X X X X X X X 61 7 50TH %: 33 32 32 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 1836 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 15TH %: 29 27 27 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 17 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 28 - 37 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 P % IN PACE: 83% 79% 79%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 C % OVER PACE: 4% 2% 3%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 E28 X X X X X 14 5 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 19% 18%27 X X X X X X X X X 27 9 *26 X X X X 31 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 32 32 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X 36 924 X X X X 22 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 17 1823 X X 11 222 X 10 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 X 01 120 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.18 0.0919 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.42 0.42 0.30 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
BALDWIN AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 1:26PM 2:46PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND MICHILLINDA AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF ADAMS AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 29 27 28 M.P.H.39 00 038 X 01 1 50TH %: 26 23 24 M.P.H.37 X 10 136 00 0 15TH %: 21 19 20 M.P.H.35 X 10 1 *34 00 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 19 - 28 19 - 28 M.P.H.33 X 10 1 *32 X X 11 2 P % IN PACE: 82% 81% 79%31 X X X 21 3 A30 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 C % OVER PACE: 6% 6% 12%29 X X X X X X X 43 7 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 2 12 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 13% 9%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10 24 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 25 23 24 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 1624 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 13 17 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 16 1723 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 2022 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 11 16 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 1620 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.16 0.16 0.0919 X X X X X X X X X 27 918 X X 02 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.40 0.30 M.P.H.17 X X X X X X X 25 716 X X X 12 315 X X X X X 14 5 100 100 200
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
HIGHLAND AVENUE
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 11:23AM 1:23PM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND CANON AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF MERRILL AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 29 31 29 M.P.H.
39 00 038 X 01 1 50TH %: 26 25 26 M.P.H.37 00 036 X 10 1 15TH %: 21 21 21 M.P.H.35 X 01 1 *34 X X X 03 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 20 - 29 20 - 29 M.P.H.33 X X X 21 3 *32 X X X X X X 33 6 P % IN PACE: 84% 76% 80%31 X X X X 22 4 A30 X X X 30 3 C % OVER PACE: 10% 16% 15%29 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14 * % UNDER PACE: 6% 7% 5%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 25 26 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 1424 X X X X X X X X 53 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 22 1823 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 1322 X X X X X X X X X 36 9 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 4 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 1320 X X X X X X 24 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.32 0.1219 X X 02 218 X 10 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.42 0.57 0.34 M.P.H.17 X X 11 216 X X X 12 315 00 0 81 68 149
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
HIGHLAND AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:51PM 4:38PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND CARTER AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 212 LIMA ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 31 29 30 M.P.H.
39 00 038 X 10 1 50TH %: 26 25 26 M.P.H.37 X 01 136 00 0 15TH %: 21 20 21 M.P.H.35 00 0 *34 X X X 21 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 20 - 29 22 - 31 M.P.H.33 X X X X 31 4 *32 X X X X X 50 5 P % IN PACE: 76% 80% 74%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 5 15 A30 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 C % OVER PACE: 6% 8% 7%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 11% 19%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 25 26 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 1924 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 19 2023 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 1922 X X X X X X X 25 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 5 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 1020 X X X X X X X 34 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.19 0.1019 X X X X X X 42 618 X X X 12 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.44 0.32 M.P.H.17 X X 11 216 X X X X X 23 515 X X X X 13 4 100 100 200
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
LIMA STREET
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 11:01AM 12:27PM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 40 LIMA ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 X X 20 243 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X 10 141 00 040 X X 20 2 85TH %: 36 33 34 M.P.H.39 X 01 138 X X X X X 41 5 50TH %: 29 27 28 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X 51 636 X X X X X X X 52 7 15TH %: 26 23 24 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X 33 6 *34 X X X 12 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 20 - 29 24 - 33 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 *32 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 P % IN PACE: 73% 76% 72%31 X X X X X X X X 53 8 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 C % OVER PACE: 23% 23% 17%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 1% 10%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 27 29 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 11 1824 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 20 2423 X X X X X X 15 622 X X X X X X 24 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 5 M.P.H.21 X X X 12 320 X X X X 04 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.22 0.1219 X 01 118 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.47 0.35 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
LIMA STREET
DATE: 05/22/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:35AM 10:19AM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND NORTH CITY LIMIT 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1056 MICHILLINDA AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 X 10 143 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X 01 141 00 040 X X X X X 14 5 85TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X 33 638 X X X X X X 24 6 50TH %: 32 29 31 M.P.H.37 X X X X X 32 536 X X X X X X X X X 63 9 15TH %: 27 23 25 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 3 13 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 P % IN PACE: 78% 55% 67%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 C % OVER PACE: 10% 15% 12%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 30% 21%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 *26 X X X X X 23 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 30 31 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X 36 924 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 34 2623 X X X 03 322 X X X X X X X 16 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 6 5 M.P.H.21 X X X 03 320 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.37 0.1319 X 01 118 X X 02 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.43 0.60 0.36 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
MICHILLINDA AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/22/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:02AM 9:31AM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF CANFIELD AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 X X 20 244 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X 20 241 X X X X X 50 540 X X 02 2 85TH %: 38 35 36 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X X 34 738 X X X X X 50 5 50TH %: 33 32 32 M.P.H.37 X X X X 22 436 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 15TH %: 26 25 26 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 13 22 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 *32 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 P % IN PACE: 65% 75% 70%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 12 14 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 C % OVER PACE: 19% 9% 14%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 E28 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 * % UNDER PACE: 16% 16% 16%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 *26 X X X X 40 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 31 32 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X 33 624 X X X X X X X 52 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 29 24 2723 X X X X X X 24 622 X X X 12 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 X X X 03 320 X X 11 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.26 0.1319 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.51 0.37 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
MICHILLINDA AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 3:16PM 4:21PM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND MIRA MONTE AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 53 MOUNTAIN TRAIL AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 X 01 1 85TH %: 32 31 31 M.P.H.39 00 038 X X 11 2 50TH %: 27 26 27 M.P.H.37 X X X 21 336 X X X X 31 4 15TH %: 21 22 21 M.P.H.35 X X X 12 3 *34 X X X X X X X 43 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 20 - 29 21 - 30 M.P.H.33 X X X X X 32 5 *32 X X X 21 3 P % IN PACE: 67% 78% 70%31 X X X X X X X X 53 8 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 C % OVER PACE: 21% 16% 19%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 5% 11%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 13 23 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 26 26 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 12 1824 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 21 2423 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 1222 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 1020 X X X X X X 24 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.23 0.1219 X X X X X 23 518 X X X X X X 42 6 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.48 0.34 M.P.H.17 X X X 30 316 X 10 115 00 0 100 100 200
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
MOUNTAIN TRAIL AVENUE
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 2:00PM 3:12PM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 70 MOUNTAIN TRAIL AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X 01 141 X X 11 240 X X X X 13 4 85TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.39 X X 11 238 00 0 50TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H.37 X X 11 236 X X X X 22 4 15TH %: 24 23 23 M.P.H.35 X X X X 31 4 *34 X X X 21 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 20 - 29 23 - 32 M.P.H.33 X X X X X 32 5 *32 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 P % IN PACE: 75% 77% 74%31 X X X X X X X 52 7 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 C % OVER PACE: 11% 21% 14%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7 19 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 2% 12%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 27 28 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 13 2224 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 27 2423 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 1022 X X X X X X X 25 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 X X 11 220 X X X X X 23 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.30 0.1219 X X X X 31 418 X X 20 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.54 0.35 M.P.H.17 X 10 116 X 01 115 00 0 100 100 200
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
MOUNTAIN TRAIL AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 12:32PM 1:17PM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND MICHILLINDA AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: EAST OF SUNNYSIDE AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 X 01 146 00 045 X X 20 244 X 01 143 X X X X 22 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND42 X X X 12 341 X X X X 31 440 X X X 21 3 85TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X X 34 738 X X X 21 3 50TH %: 29 33 31 M.P.H.37 X X X X X 14 536 X X X X X X X 34 7 15TH %: 26 28 26 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 11 13 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 12 18 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 28 - 37 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X 17 8 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 12 16 P % IN PACE: 75% 73% 71%31 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 C % OVER PACE: 21% 14% 21%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4 18 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 13% 8%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 2 15 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 33 32 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X 62 824 X X X 21 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 29 24 2823 X X 11 222 X 01 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 X 10 120 X 01 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.26 0.1419 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.51 0.37 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
ORANGE GROVE AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 1:21PM 1:52PM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND EAST CITY LIMIT 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 61 ORANGE GROVE AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 X 10 148 X 10 147 X X 11 246 X X X X X 32 545 X X X 21 344 X X X 12 343 X 01 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND42 X X X 12 341 X X X X 22 440 X X X X 13 4 85TH %: 39 39 39 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X X 52 738 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 50TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 1336 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 15TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 13 21 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 P % IN PACE: 68% 73% 71%31 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 A30 X X X X X X 33 6 C % OVER PACE: 18% 16% 17%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 E28 X X X X X 41 5 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 10% 12%27 X X X X X X 33 6 *26 X X X 21 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 34 34 M.P.H.25 X X X X X 32 524 X X 11 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31 26 2823 X 10 122 X 01 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.21 X 01 120 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.31 0.26 0.1419 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.51 0.38 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
ORANGE GROVE AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/19/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 11:43AM 1:43PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GRANDVIEW AVE AND ARNO DR 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF OAKWOOD PLACE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X 01 141 X 01 140 00 0 85TH %: 32 35 34 M.P.H.39 X X 02 238 00 0 50TH %: 27 31 28 M.P.H.37 X X 11 236 00 0 15TH %: 22 21 22 M.P.H.35 X X X X X 23 5 *34 X X X X X X X 34 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X X X X 22 4 *32 X X X X X 23 5 P % IN PACE: 75% 63% 63%31 X X X X X X X 34 7 A30 X X X X X X X X 26 8 C % OVER PACE: 19% 12% 6%29 X X X X X X 42 6 E28 X X X X X 32 5 * % UNDER PACE: 6% 24% 30%27 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 *26 X X X X X X X X 53 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 30 28 M.P.H.25 X X X X 31 424 X X X X X 32 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 37 2923 X X X X 31 422 X X X X X X 60 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 6 5 M.P.H.21 X 01 120 X X X X 13 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.91 0.2919 X X X 12 318 X 10 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.96 0.54 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 52 47 99
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
SANTA ANITA AVENUE
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 10:20AM 10:56AM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LIMA ST AND MICHILLINDA AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 425 SIERRA MADRE BLVD63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND42 00 041 X 01 140 00 0 85TH %: 31 35 33 M.P.H.39 X X 02 238 X X X 21 3 50TH %: 28 29 28 M.P.H.37 X 01 136 X X X X X 14 5 15TH %: 23 26 25 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X 07 7 *34 X X X X X X X 25 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 26 - 35 24 - 33 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14 P % IN PACE: 83% 77% 76%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 C % OVER PACE: 8% 10% 14%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7 20 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 13% 11%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 30 29 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4 1624 X X X X X X X X 53 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 20 1923 X X X X X X X X 71 822 X X X 21 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 X X X X 31 420 X X X X X 32 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.21 0.0919 X 10 118 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.46 0.30 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 9:40AM 10:16AM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND LIMA ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 161 SIERRA MADRE BLVD63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H.39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 24 23 23 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 19 18 18 M.P.H.35 X 10 1 *34 X 01 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 18 - 27 17 - 26 18 - 27 M.P.H.33 X X 11 2 *32 X 01 1 P % IN PACE: 81% 86% 82%31 X 10 1 A30 X X X X X 32 5 C % OVER PACE: 16% 10% 11%29 X X X X X 41 5 E28 X X X X X X X X 62 8 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 4% 7%27 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 22 23 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 2024 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 13 25 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 14 1523 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 2122 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 1120 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.15 0.0719 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 1018 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.38 0.27 M.P.H.17 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 1016 X X X X 04 415 00 0 100 100 200
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:35AM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND EAST CITY LIMIT 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 361 SIERRA MADRE BLVD63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 X 01 145 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND42 X 10 141 00 040 X X X 30 3 85TH %: 35 34 34 M.P.H.39 X X 02 238 X X X 21 3 50TH %: 30 31 31 M.P.H.37 X X X X X 32 536 X X X X X 14 5 15TH %: 26 24 25 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 14 22 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6 18 P % IN PACE: 79% 69% 74%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 C % OVER PACE: 10% 11% 10%29 X X X X X X X X X 63 9 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 20% 16%27 X X X X X X X X X 63 9 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 30 30 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X 34 724 X X X X X X X 07 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 24 2223 X X X X X X 24 622 X X X X X X 42 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.21 X X X 12 320 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.20 0.26 0.1119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.51 0.33 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD
DATE: 05/19/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 1:51PM 3:51PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND NORTH CITY LIMIT 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 126 SUNNYSIDE AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 29 31 30 M.P.H.39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 24 25 25 M.P.H.37 00 036 X 01 1 15TH %: 20 20 20 M.P.H.35 X 10 1 *34 X X 11 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 20 - 29 20 - 29 20 - 29 M.P.H.33 X X 11 2 *32 X X X X 13 4 P % IN PACE: 76% 72% 74%31 X X X X X 32 5 A30 X X X X X 14 5 C % OVER PACE: 13% 16% 14%29 X X X X X X X 43 7 E28 X X X X X X X 25 7 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 12% 12%27 X X X X X X X 52 7 *26 X X X X X X X X 26 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 25 25 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 1124 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 22 2123 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 1322 X X X X X X X 52 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X 51 620 X X X X X X X 34 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.43 0.1819 X X X 03 318 X X X X 31 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.57 0.66 0.42 M.P.H.17 X X 11 216 X X X 21 315 X 10 1 62 54 116
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/22/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 10:53AM 12:53PM FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 35 SUNNYSIDE AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 29 28 29 M.P.H.39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 22 24 23 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 19 19 19 M.P.H.35 X X 20 2 *34 00 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 18 - 27 20 - 29 19 - 28 M.P.H.33 X X 11 2 *32 X 01 1 P % IN PACE: 75% 77% 75%31 X X X X X X 42 6 A30 X X X 03 3 C % OVER PACE: 20% 6% 15%29 X X X X X X 24 6 E28 X X X X X 23 5 * % UNDER PACE: 5% 16% 10%27 X X X X X 32 5 *26 X X X X X X X X 26 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 24 23 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X 17 824 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 10 13 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 17 1923 X X X X X X X X 62 822 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X X 44 820 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.27 0.1619 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 1118 X X X 30 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.64 0.52 0.40 M.P.H.17 X X X X X 23 516 X X X 12 315 X 01 1 55 65 120
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
DATE: 05/19/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 9:31AM 11:31AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): STURTEVANT DR AND NORTH CITY LIMIT 60 00 059 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 561 WOODLAND DR58 00 057 00 056 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 15 MPH OBSERVER:55 00 054 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:53 00 052 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:51 00 050 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:49 00 048 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:47 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 042 00 041 00 040 00 039 00 038 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND37 00 036 00 035 00 0 85TH %: 22 23 22 M.P.H.34 00 033 00 0 50TH %: 20 20 20 M.P.H.32 00 031 00 0 15TH %: 16 16 16 M.P.H.30 00 0 *29 00 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 15 - 24 15 - 24 15 - 24 M.P.H.28 00 0 *27 00 0 P % IN PACE: 52% 59% 56%26 00 0 A25 00 0 C % OVER PACE: 0% 0% 0%24 00 0 E23 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 48% 41% 44%22 00 0 *21 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 19 19 19 M.P.H.20 00 019 X 10 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 77 718 XXXXXX 24 617 XXXXXXX 43 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3 3 3 M.P.H.16 XXXXXXXXX 63 915 XXXXXXXXXXX 2 9 11 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.18 0.1114 XXXXX 23 513 XXXX 22 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.43 0.33 M.P.H.12 XXXXXX 51 611 XXXXXX 33 610 XXXXXX 24 6 29 32 61
CARLOSSUNNYDRYFAIRRADAR
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO
WOODLAND DRIVE
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
APPENDIX C
Survey Equipment
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Survey Equipment Used
The radar equipment used by City Traffic Counters to collect speed measurements for this survey was a Stalker-II SDR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar and a Stalker-ATR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar both manufactured by Applied Concepts of Plano, Texas. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the units were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Stalker-II SDR Hand-Held Traffic Radar and Stalker-ATR Model HandHeld Traffic Radar were last calibrated on January 16, 2023 by Southern California Radar/Laser Certification Laboratory.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
APPENDIX D
Legislative References
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code
The following sections of the CVC are from the most recently published CVC as of August 2023 and contain new sections pertaining to AB 43.
Engineering and Traffic Surveys
Section 627.
(a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses of business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Basic Speed Law
Section 22350.
No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
Speed Law Violations
Section 22351.
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22352.
The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. (2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.
Section 22357.1.
Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children’s 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 mile per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted.
Section 22358.4
(a)
(1) Wherever a local authority determines upon the basis on an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is more than reasonable or safe, the local authority my, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected up on the highway.
(b)
(1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior and after the school zone.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5)
(A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) For the purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at a distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from school grounds.
Residence Districts
Section 515.
A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district,
(a)
upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or
(b)
within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.
Business Activity Districts
Section 22358.9.
(c)
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the flowing conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (d) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that a portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (e) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (f) A local authority shall issue only warning citation for violation of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Minimum and Maximum Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22357.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
Section 22358.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 45, 40, 35, 30, 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
Section 22358.3.
Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
Section 22360.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the speed limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a highway other than a state highway for a distance of not exceeding 2,000 feet in length between district, either business or residence, the local authority may determine and declare a reasonable and safe prima facie limit thereon lower than 65 mile per hour, but not less than 25 miles per hour, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street or highway.
Downward Speed Zoning
Section 22358.5.
It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.
Safety Corridors (Added code from AB 43)
Section 22358.7.
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) A portion of the highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(3) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government code, whichever is sooner.
(4) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Maintaining Posted Speeds (Added code from AB 43)
Section 22358.8.
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Boundary Line Streets
Section 22359.
With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.
Speed Trap Prohibition
Section 40801.
No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.
Speed Trap
Section 40802.
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
(2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
(b)
(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
(3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour of 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (c)
(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
(C)
(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B)
(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.
Speed Trap Evidence
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Section 40803.
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
2025 ADT Data
Weekday & Weekend Data 2025
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200