Cities Index.
Agenda packet, regular meeting

Sierra Madre City Council
March 24, 2026

Document
Agenda packet, regular meeting
Meeting
March 24, 2026
Body
Sierra Madre City Council
Pages
15
Original file
55.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on s3.us-west-004.backblazeb2.com. That file is the official record.

SUMMARY
Following the iniital traffic study presentaiton to the City Council on August 26, 2025, the City Council directed staff to reevaluate specific intersecitons for potenital stop sign installaitons to enhance community safety and traffic management. In December 2025, Willdan Engineering was engaged to perform this re-evaluaiton and deliver a revised Traffic Study along with an On-Street Parking Management Plan. This report provides acitonable recommendaitons for these intersecitons and addresses geometric constraints and parking-induced congesiton along West Grand View Avenue.

DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

1. Interseciton Traffic Control Studies
The December 2025 Revised Traffic Study evaluated peak-hour vehicle turning movements, pedestrian counts, bicycle counts, and collision history (May 2020 to January 2025) to ascertain whether the requested intersecitons meet the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) warrants for all-way stops. Recognizing that low traffic volume does not inherently imply the absence of risk, the revised study predominantly relied on "Warrant E" (Engineering Judgment) to recommend proacitve safety measures.

Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue: Data indicated minimal mulitmodal traffic volumes and no reported collisions. The study effecitvely implemented Warrant E, noitng that achieving complete control will miitgate sight distance issues and enhance operaitonal performance.

Recommendaiton: Implement an All-Way Stop
South Sunnyside Avenue & Mariposa Avenue: Data showed very low mulitmodal volumes and zero reported collisions.

Uitlizing Warrant E, engineering judgment concluded an all-way stop will improve traffic operaitonal predictability and assist pedestrians.

Recommendaiton: Install All-Way Stop
North Michillinda Avenue & W. Grand View Avenue: Jurisdiciton is shared with Pasadena. Despite low volumes, the study applied Warrant E.

Recommendaiton: Install All-Way Stop (coordinated with Pasadena) East Grand View Avenue & N. Canon Avenue: This interseciton is located near Sierra Madre Middle School. The study recorded low volumes and one correctable collision. The interseciton did not meet the rigid CA MUTCD warrants for an all-way stop, and Willdan recommended only upgrading the exisitng crosswalk and ADA ramps. However, to address the Council's explicit safety direcitves for this school corridor, staff recommends that the Council exercise its administraitve authority to override the study's stop-sign findings.

Recommendaiton: Install All-Way Stop and maintain the high visibility crosswalk with ADA-compliant ramps West Grand View Avenue & Wilson Street / Michillinda Avenue & Valley View Street: Neither interseciton met quanittaitve warrants, nor did they exhibit qualitaitve factors sufficient to invoke Warrant E.

Recommendaiton: No changes at this itme

2. West Grand View Avenue On-Street Parking Management Plan West Grand View Avenue possesses a structural width of approximately 36 feet. With parallel parking allowed on both the northern and southern sides, the remaining space allocated for acitve travel lanes is markedly constrained (around 10 feet per direciton), resulitng in considerable congesiton during peak commuitng and school hours.

Willdan conducted a Parking Occupancy Survey, which empirically demonstrated that vehicle storage uitlizaiton is consistently lower on the south side of the street. To dynamically restore safe travel lane widths without permanently removing community parking, the study recommends targeted, temporal restricitons. Establishing "No Parking" zones on the south side from N. Baldwin Ave to N. Michillinda Ave exclusively during peak weekday periods (7:00 AM to 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM to 5:00 PM) will alleviate the circulaiton bottleneck. Outside of these six hours, and throughout the weekend, the curb space will revert to residenital parking.

3. Mulitmodal Circulaiton Planning and Grant Funding
The immediate interseciton controls and parking restricitons recommended in this report address pressing, localized neighborhood requests. While these targeted intervenitons are necessary, achieving the City's long-term mobility and safety goals requires a comprehensive planning framework. To advance this citywide strategy, the City has applied for a $262,000 Caltrans Sustainable Communiites Compeititve grant for the FY 2026-27 cycle. This grant, supported by a $33,945 in-kind local match composed of staff itme and labor, will fund the development of the Sierra Madre Mulitmodal Safe Transportaiton and Circulaiton Plan Update.

If awarded, this grant will yield specific, acitonable deliverables that directly build upon and expand the site-specific recommendaitons presented today. The project is designed to inform complete street policies for the circulaiton element and expand acitve transportaiton opitons for all users. Key deliverables include:

Formaiton of a Local Transportaiton Advisory Committee: The project will fund formal community engagement and establish an advisory committee. This effort will involve strategic partnerships with the Pasadena Unified School District, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportaiton Authority, Southern California Council of Governments, Caltrans, and local civic groups. This collaboraitve framework ensures that future neighborhood safety concerns are evaluated comprehensively alongside regional transit objecitves.

Comprehensive Transportaiton Analysis and Infrastructure Upgrades: The grant will finance a citywide Transportaiton Analysis aimed at idenitfying and addressing potenital barriers within the grid network that impact mobility. This analysis will specifically assess and develop adaptable policies to enhance sidewalk infrastructure, on-street bicycle faciliites, bicycle parking, and pedestrian crossings. The resulitng infrastructure strategies will prioriitze ADA compliance and accessible linkages, with paritcular atteniton to the safety of vulnerable populaitons, including seniors, youth, and individuals with disabiliites.

Prioriitzaiton of Implementaiton Strategies: A significant deliverable of the grant involves the development of an updated citywide Comprehensive Mulitmodal Transportaiton and Circulaiton Plan that explicitly prioriitzes short- and long-term projects for implementaiton. This formalized list will furnish the City Council with a vetted, strategic roadmap to systemaitcally enhance network safety, thereby obviaitng the need to evaluate individual interseciton controls in isolaiton. Addiitonally, idenitfying these projects within an adopted plan ensures compliance with state mandates concerning Vehicle Miles Traveled (SB743) and Greenhouse Gas reduciton (AB32), thereby posiitoning the City favorably for future state and federal funding.

STRATEGIC PLAN RELATIONSHIP
The holisitc implementaiton of the E&TS speed limits, the proacitve installaiton of All-Way Stops under CA MUTCD Warrant E, and the deployment of targeted parking management strongly reinforce the City's long-term planning framework. This report and the associated staff recommendaitons are directly consistent with the following Sierra Madre Strategic Plan efforts:

Objecitve 2.4: "Develop and Implement a Safe Streets Iniitaitve." Iniitaitve PS 2.4.1: "Opitmize Traffic Flow and Management." Project PS 2.4.1 A: "Development of Circulaiton Plan."
Project PS 2.4.1 B: "Traffic Survey for Major Streets." Project PS 2.4.1 C: "Traffic Study for Selected Intersecitons." Furthermore, the integraiton of these traffic strategies with downtown economic objecitves correlates directly to Strategic Plan Goal 4 - Community Enrichment, Objecitve 4.2, which emphasizes fostering collaboraiton between residents and business enitites to enhance community vitality. By uitlizing empirical data to reallocate curb space and applying progressive engineering judgment to prioriitze vulnerable road users, these iniitaitves systemaitcally and comprehensively advance the City's overarching Safe Streets paradigm.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed acitons, encompassing the formal modificaiton of posted speed limits, the installaiton of traffic control signage (stop signs), the repainitng of crosswalks, the pouring of ADA-compliant concrete pedestrian ramps, and the establishment of temporary parking restricitons, consittute administraitve acitons and minor physical alteraitons to exisitng public right-of-way infrastructure. Accordingly, these minor traffic control adjustments are generally exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under seciton 14, CCR 15061(b)(3). It can be determined that these localized operaitonal acitviites will have no significant adverse impact on the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT
Following a compeititve Request for Proposals (RFP) process iniitated in March 2025, three bids were formally received and evaluated (Willdan Engineering: $40,100; Transtech Engineers: $61,800; Fehr & Peers: $65,840). The contract was successfully awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Willdan Engineering, for a total cost of $40,100. Willdan produced the requisite empirical data to perform the CA MUTCD warrant analyses, and generate the definiitve 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report, the localized Traffic Studies, and the On-Street Parking Management Plan using Measure R funds.

Sufficient funding is available in the FY 2025-26 Public Works Department Operaitng Bubdget to install stop signs, "No Parking" signage, stripe high-visibility crosswalks, and pour ADA-compliant ramps.

Approved by:
___________________________
Michael Bruckner
City Manager
Attachments

1. Sierra Madre Traffic Parking Management Study_Final Revised.pdf

2. Traffic Survey and Traffic Studies Reports.pdf
1 City of Sierra Madre
Traffic Study and On-Street
Parking Management Plan on
West Grand View Avenue
December 2025 (Revised)
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 2 Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue ...................................................................... 4 Mariposa Avenue and South Sunnyside Avenue..................................................................... 9 Michillinda Avenue and West Grand Avenue ....................................................................... 14 East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue.............................................................. 19 West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street........................................................................ 24 Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue............................................ 29 West Grand View Avenue Parking Analysis.......................................................................... 34 Tables
Table 1 (Existing Parking Restrictions).................................................................................. 34 Table 2 (Average Occupancy)............................................................................................... 35 Attachments
Attachment A – 24 Hour Vehicle Counts (ADT)
Attachment B – Peak Hour Turning Movement, Bike, and Pedestrian Counts Attachment C – All-Way Stop Warrant Sheets
Attachment D – Parking Occupancy Survey
Page | 2
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Executive Summary
Willdan Engineering was asked to conduct studies on six intersections and evaluate the need for all-way stop control and pedestrian and bicycle safety enhancements. The analysis was based on the applicable California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices’ (CA MUTCD) warrants, observations of data and engineering judgement.

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and peak hour vehicle turning movement, pedestrian, and bike counts were taken at all six intersections for the study. Additionally, the collision history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 was reviewed for each intersection to determine the crash history.

The following pages of the report represent the detailed analysis of each intersection and the parking analysis of West Grand View Avenue. A summary of the findings is presented below.

Intersection Analysis
The findings for each intersection are summarized as follows:

1. Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue - The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show very low volumes at this intersection. Additionally, a review of the collision history indicated that there have not been any collisions at the intersection. Based on engineering judgement, the intersection met Warrant E for an all-way stop. Therefore, it is recommended that an all-way stop be installed at the intersection.

2. South Sunnyside Avenue and Mariposa Avenue - The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show very low volumes at this intersection. Additionally, a review of the collision history indicated that there have not been any collisions at the intersection. Based on engineering judgement, the intersection met Warrant E for an all-way stop. Therefore, it is recommended that an all-way stop be installed at the intersection.

3. North Michillinda Avenue and West Grand View Avenue (shared with the City of Pasadena) - The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection. Additionally, a review of the collision history indicated that there have not been any collisions at the intersection that would be corrected by all-way stop. Based on engineering judgement, the intersection met Warrant E for an all-way stop. Therefore, it is recommended that an all-way stop be installed at the intersection.

4. East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue - The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection. Additionally, a review of the collision history indicated that there has been one collision at the intersection that would be corrected by all-way stop. The intersection did not meet the warrants for an all-way stop. The number of school aged pedestrians recorded in the counts Page | 3
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
did not meet the generally accepted warrants for Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs), despite the existing school south of the intersection. However, since the existing crosswalk is being used by school children, it is recommended that the existing painted crosswalk be converted to a high-visibility crosswalk and that the pedestrian ramps be upgraded to current Americans with Disabilities (ADA) standards.

5. West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street - The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection. Additionally, a review of the collision history indicated that there have not been any collisions at the intersection that would be corrected by all-way stop. The intersection did not meet the warrants for an all-way stop. Although there is a private school located adjacent to the intersection, the data does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). Therefore, it is recommended that the intersection remain as is and that no further traffic controls be implemented.

6. Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue (shared with the City of Pasadena) - The vehicle volumes on Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue and the pedestrian and bicycle data for the intersection are low.

Additionally, there have been no collisions at the intersection in the records since May 5, 2020 that would be corrected by the installation of an all-way stopcontrolled intersection. The intersection did not meet the warrants for an all-way stop. The data also does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). Therefore, it is recommended that the intersection remain as is and that no further traffic controls be implemented.

West Grand View Avenue Parking Analysis
The parking demand on West Grand View Avenue between Michillinda Avenue and North Baldwin Avenue was analyzed to determine the feasibility of installing “No Parking” along one side of the street on this segment. Data was collected to determine the parking occupancy along West Grand View Avenue during the peak hours on a typical weekday and weekend. The result of calculating the average parking occupancy for the north and south sides of the street segment for both the weekday and weekend indicated that there is less parking demand on the south side of the street. It was determined in the study that parking restrictions should be implemented during peak traffic periods only.

Therefore, it is recommended that parking restrictions be implemented for peak traffic hours along the south side of West Grand Avenue between Michillinda Avenue and North Baldwin Avenue on Monday through Friday to address circulation issues.

Page | 4
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue
The intersection of Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue has stop controls for eastbound and westbound Fairview Avenue. North Sunnyside Avenue has no controls.

There are also no marked crosswalks. An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an all-way stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

North Sunnyside Avenue is
designated as a Major Collector in the
Sierra Madre General Plan. North
Sunnyside Avenue is approximately
40 feet wide, and parking is
unrestricted on either side. The
posted speed limit is 30 mph.

Fairview Avenue is a Local Street and
is approximately 36 feet. Parking is
unrestricted on either side and there
is no posted speed limit.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there were no collisions at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12- month period.

Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on Sunnyside Avenue at Fairview Avenue. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025. The following tables summarize the data collected:

Fairview Ave
N
Sunnyside Ave
N
Page | 5
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Sunnyside Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
North Approach
(Southbound)
183 14 (9:15) 20 (2:15)
South Approach
(Northbound)
238 22 (11:00) 25 (12:00)
Fairview Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 322 44 (7:15) 24 (4:45)
West Approach (Eastbound) 372 27 (10:45) 33 (12:15)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of Sunnyside Avenue and Fairview Avenue. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the pedestrian and bike data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (Fairview) 8:15 AM 7
West Leg (Fairview) 6:00 PM 6
North Leg
(Sunnyside)
6:00 PM 4
South Leg
(Sunnyside)
8:15 AM 2
Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Bike Volume
Northbound
(Sunnyside)
8:15 AM 1
Southbound
(Sunnyside)
6:00 PM 1
Eastbound (Fairview) 6:00 PM 1
Westbound (Fairview) 8:15 AM 1
Page | 6
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is not met for this location.

B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

Not
Satisfied
There were no reported collisions in a recent 12-month time period.

C. Minimum Volume and Delay Not
Satisfied
Page | 7
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Street
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
11 AM
12 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5PM
Major 300 168 51 58 61 50 46 50 49 44 51
Minor 200 112 31 24 31 25 33 42 36 22 36
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averages 51 vph and 31 vph respectively, on an average day. The major street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 210 vph and the minor street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 140 vph for the eight highest hours. For these reasons, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Warrant D is not satisfied.

E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics Satisfied
Page | 8
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

This criterion is satisfied using the following special conditions at the study intersection.

1. Left turns will be assisted by an all-way stop.

2. All-way stop will assist pedestrians in the area.

3. There are sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. Operational characteristics will be improved with an all-way stop.

Based on the data collected and field observations, Warrant E is satisfied for the intersection of Fairview Avenue and Sunnyside Avenue.

Recommendations
The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show very low volumes at this intersection.

Additionally, there have not been any collisions at the intersection in the records from May 5, 2020. However, a review of other warrant criteria for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is warranted.

Page | 9
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Mariposa Avenue and South Sunnyside Avenue
The intersection of Mariposa Avenue and South Sunnyside Avenue has stop controls for northbound and northbound South Sunnyside Avenue. Mariposa Avenue has no controls. There are also no marked crosswalks. An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an all-way stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

North Sunnyside Avenue is
designated as a Major Collector in the
Sierra Madre General Plan. South
Sunnyside Avenue is approximately
36 feet wide, and parking is
unrestricted on either side. The
posted speed limit is 30 mph.

Fairview Avenue is a Local Street and
is approximately 36 feet. Parking is
unrestricted on either side and there
is no posted speed limit.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there were no collisions at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12- month period.

Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on Sunnyside Avenue at Mariposa Avenue. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025. The following tables summarize the data collected: Sunnyside Ave
N
Mariposa Ave
N
Page | 10
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Sunnyside Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
North Approach
(Southbound)
488 44 (7:15) 47 (3:00)
South Approach
(Northbound)
641 91 (7:45) 72 (3:00)
Mariposa Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 370 25 (9:45) 38 (4:00)
West Approach (Eastbound) 353 47 (7:15) 28 (12:15)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of Sunnyside Avenue and Mariposa Avenue. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the pedestrian and bike data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (Mariposa) 8:30 AM 3
West Leg (Mariposa) 8:30 PM 1
North Leg (Sunnyside) 5:00 PM 2
South Leg (Sunnyside) 8:30 AM 5
Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Bike Volume
Northbound
(Sunnyside)
N/A 0
Southbound
(Sunnyside)
5:00 PM 1
Eastbound (Mariposa) N/A 0
Westbound (Mariposa) 8:30 AM 1
Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

Page | 11
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of Sunnyside Avenue and Mariposa Avenue were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is not met for this location.

B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. Not
Satisfied
There were no reported collisions in a recent 12-month.

Page | 12
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM
8 AM
11 AM
12 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5PM
Major 300 168 91 70 116 74 93 79 119 90 83
Minor 200 112 54 55 53 42 45 60 63 60 52
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averages to 91 vph and 54 vph respectively, on an average day.

The major street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 210 vph and the minor street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 140 vph for the eight highest hours. For these reasons, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Warrant D is not satisfied.

Page | 13
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the study intersection.

1. Left turns will be assisted by an all-way stop.

2. All-way stop will assist pedestrians in the area.

3. There are sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. Operational characteristics will be improved with an all-way stop.

Based on the data collected and field observations, Warrant E is satisfied for the intersection of Mariposa Avenue and Sunnyside Avenue.

Recommendations
The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show very low volumes at this intersection.

Additionally, there have not been any collisions at the intersection in the records from May 5, 2020. However, a review of other warrant criteria for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is warranted.

Page | 14
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Michillinda Avenue and West Grand View Avenue
The intersection of Michillinda Avenue and West Grand View Avenue is a “T” Intersection that has shared jurisdiction with the City of Pasadena (west of the centerline of Michillinda Avenue). The intersection has stop controls for westbound West Grand View Avenue.

Michillinda Avenue has no controls. The Alverno Heights Academy, a private Kindergarten through 8th grade school, is located on the southeast corner of the intersection. There are also no marked crosswalks. An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an all-way stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

Michillinda Avenue is
designated as a Minor Arterial
in the Sierra Madre General
Plan. South Sunnyside
Avenue is approximately 46
feet wide, and parking is
unrestricted on either side.

The posted speed limit is 35
mph.

West Grand View Avenue is
also designated a Minor
Arterial and is approximately
36 feet wide. Parking is
unrestricted on either side and
the posted speed limit is 30
mph.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there was one collision at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12- month period.

Michillinda Ave
N
W. Grand View Ave
Page | 15
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Date Time Location Primary
Collision
Factor
Collision Type
1/3/23 8:43 pm 10’ North of
Intersection
Right-of-Way Sideswipe
Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on Michillinda Avenue at West Grand View Avenue. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025. The following tables summarize the data collected:

Michillinda Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
North Approach
(Southbound)
3,297 239 (7:15) 296 (3:15)
South Approach
(Northbound)
1,925 205 (7:45) 194 (2:30)
West Grand View Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 1,764 300 (7:45) 196 (2:30)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of Michillinda Avenue and West Grand View Avenue. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (W. Grand View) 8:45 AM 2
West Leg (W. Grand
View)
N/A 0
North Leg (Michillinda) N/A 0
South Leg (Michillinda) 8:45 AM 2
Page | 16
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Bike Volume
Northbound (Michillinda) 6:00 PM 2
Southbound (Michillinda) 8:45 AM 2
Eastbound (W. Grand
View)
6:00 PM 1
Westbound (W. Grand
View)
6:00 PM 3
Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of Michillinda Avenue at West Grand View Avenue were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is not met for this location.

Page | 17
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

Not
Satisfied
There were no reported collisions in a recent 12-month period that would be corrected by an all-way stop.

C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM
8 AM
12 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6PM
Major 300 168 394 371 395 387 412 460 400 412 311
Minor 200 112 145 178 245 87 140 179 122 117 90
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averages 394 vph and 145 vph respectively, on an average day.

The major street satisfies the minimum average volume of 300 vph, but the minor street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 200 vph for the eight highest hours. For these reasons, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Page | 18
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
Warrant D is not satisfied.

E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Not
Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the study intersection.

1. Left turns will be assisted by an all-way stop.

2. All-way stop will assist pedestrians in the area.

3. There are sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. Operational characteristics will be improved with all-way stop.

Based on the data collected and field observations, Warrant E for an all-way stop is satisfied for the intersection of Michillinda Avenue and West Grand View Avenue.

Recommendations
The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection.

Additionally, there have not been any collisions at the intersection in the records from May 5, 2020 that would be corrected by the installation of an all-way stop-controlled intersection. However, a review of other warrant criteria for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is warranted. The City of Sierra Madre should work with the City of Pasadena, which shares jurisdiction within this intersection, on the installation of the all-way stop control.

Page | 19
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue
The intersection of East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue has stop controls for northbound and southbound North Canon Avenue. East Grand View Avenue has no controls. Sierra Madre Middle School is located less than a quarter of a mile (approximately 700 feet) south of the intersection. There is a yellow marked crosswalk on the east leg of the intersection. An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an allway stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

East Grand View Avenue is
designated as a Minor Arterial
in the Sierra Madre General
Plan. South Sunnyside
Avenue is approximately 36
feet wide, and parking is
unrestricted on either side.

The posted speed limit is 30
mph.

North Canon Avenue is
designated a Local Street and
is approximately 36 feet wide.

Parking is unrestricted on
either side. There is no posted
speed limit is 30 mph.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there was one collision at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12- month period.

N. Canon Ave
N
E. Grand View Ave
Page | 20
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Date Time Location Primary
Collision
Factor
Collision Type
12/10/24 8:07 am At Intersection Right-of-Way Broadside Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025. The following tables summarize the data collected:

North Canon Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
North Approach
(Southbound)
319 33 (10:15) 34 (6:00)
South Approach
(Northbound)
417 90 (7:30) 65 (3:00)
East Grand View Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 1,628 221 (7:30) 124 (2:30)
West Approach (Eastbound) 1,613 148 (7:30) 193 (2:45)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (E. Grand View) 8:30 AM 9
West Leg (E. Grand View) 8:30 AM 4
North Leg (N. Canon) 8:30 AM 7
South Leg (N. Canon) 8:30 AM 6
Page | 21
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Bike Volume
Northbound (N. Canon) 5:00 PM 1
Southbound (N. Canon) 5:00 PM 1
Eastbound (E. Grand View) 8:30 AM 3
Westbound (E. Grand
View)
8:30 AM 2
Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is not met for this location.

Page | 22
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

Not
Satisfied
There was one reported collision in a recent 12-month period that would be corrected by an all way stop.

C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6PM
Major 300 168 255 294 269 229 240 303 258 238 212
Minor 200 112 53 58 92 31 36 34 96 48 31
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averages 255 vph and 53 vph respectively, on an average day.

Neither the major street satisfies the minimum average volume of 300 vph nor the minor street satisfies the minimum average volume of 200 vph for the eight highest hours. For these reasons, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Page | 23
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
Warrant D is not satisfied.

E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Not
Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the study intersection.

1. The peak hour left-turn volumes are low and there were no observed leftturn conflicts.

2. There pedestrian volumes are low and there are no conflicts.

3. There are no sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. The two roadways are not collector through streets and all-way stop will not improve the operational characteristics.

Based on the data collected, none of the warrants for an all-way stop are satisfied for the intersection of East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue.

Recommendations
The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection.

Additionally, there was only one collision at the intersection in the records since May 5, 2020 that would be corrected by the installation of an all-way stop-controlled intersection.

A review of the warrants for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is not warranted. Considering the close proximity of a school south of the intersection, the data was analyzed to see if it met the generally accepted warrants for Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). The number of school aged pedestrians recorded in the counts did not meet the warrant. However, since the existing crosswalk is being used by school children, it is recommended that the existing painted crosswalk be converted to a high-visibility crosswalk and that the pedestrian ramps be upgraded to current standards as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Page | 24
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street
The intersection of West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street is a “T” intersection with stop controls for northbound Wilson Street. West Grand View Avenue has no controls.

The Alverno Heights Academy, a private Kindergarten through 8th grade school, is located on the southwest corner of the intersection. An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an all-way stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

West Grand View Avenue is
designated as a Minor Arterial
in the Sierra Madre General
Plan and is approximately 36
feet wide. Parking is
unrestricted on either side and
the posted speed limit is 30
mph.

Wilson Street is designated a
Local Street and is
approximately 36 feet wide.

Parking is unrestricted on
either side. There is no posted
speed limit.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there were no collisions at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12- month period.

N
W. Grand View Ave
Wilson St
N
Page | 25
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025. The following tables summarize the data collected:

Wilson Street Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
South Approach
(Northbound)
74 15 (7:15) 21 (2:30)
West Grand View Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 1,760 298 (7:45) 196 (2:30)
West Approach (Eastbound) 1,822 163 (7:15) 214 (3:30)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (W. Grand View) 5:00 PM 2
West Leg (W. Grand
View)
6:00 PM 2
North Leg (Wilson) N/A 0
South Leg (Wilson) 8:30 AM 14
Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Bike Volume
Northbound (Wilson St) N/A 0
Eastbound (W. Grand
View)
8:30 AM 2
Westbound (W. Grand
View)
8:30 AM 3
Page | 26
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is not met for this location.

B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

Not
Satisfied
There was no reported collisions in a recent 12-month period that would be corrected by an all-way stop.

Page | 27
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6PM
Major 300 168 299 318 333 222 297 363 319 307 231
Minor 200 112 7 11 7 2 3 21 5 3 4
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averaged 299 vph and 7 vph respectively, on an average day.

Neither the major street satisfies the minimum average volume of 300 vph nor the minor street satisfies the minimum average volume of 200 vph for the eight highest hours. For these reasons, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Warrant D is not satisfied.

Page | 28
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Not
Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the study intersection.

1. The peak hour left-turn volumes are low and there were no observed leftturn conflicts.

2. There pedestrian volumes are low and there are no conflicts.

3. There are no sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. The two roadways are not collector through streets and all-way stop will not improve the operational characteristics.

Based on the data collected, none of the warrants for an all-way stop are satisfied for the intersection of West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street.

Recommendations
The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection.

Additionally, there were no collisions at the intersection in the records since May 5, 2020 that would be corrected by the installation of an all-way stop-controlled intersection. A review of the warrants for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is not warranted. Although there is an existing school on the southwest corner, the data did not meet the generally accepted warrants for a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs) installation.

Page | 29
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue The intersection of Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue has stop controls for eastbound Valley View Avenue and westbound Montecito Avenue. The intersection has shared jurisdiction with the City of Pasadena (west of the centerline of Michillinda Avenue). An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an all-way stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

Michillinda Avenue is
designated as a Minor Arterial
in the Sierra Madre General
Plan and is approximately 46
feet wide. Parking is
unrestricted on either side and
the posted speed limit is 35
mph.

Valley View Avenue (west of
Michillinda Avenue) is located
within the jurisdiction of
Pasadena. The roadway is
approximately 56 feet wide.

Parking is unrestricted on
either side. The posted speed
limit is 25 mph.

Montecito Street (east of
Michillinda Avenue) is
designated a Local Street and
is approximately 30 feet wide.

Parking is unrestricted on
either side and there is no
posted speed limit.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there were no collisions at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12- month period.

Michillinda Ave
N
Valley View Ave Montecito Ave
Page | 30
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025.

The following tables summarize the data collected:

Michillinda Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
South Approach
(Northbound)
4,751 381 (7:15) 447 (4:30)
North Approach
(Southbound)
4,415 613 (7:45) 445 (2:30)
Valley View Street/Montecito
Avenue
Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 476 56 (7:30) 27 (3:00)
West Approach (Eastbound) 281 34 (7:00) 55 (5:30)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (Valley View) 5:15 PM 9
West Leg (Montecito) 5:15 PM 8
North Leg (Michillinda) 8:30 AM 4
South Leg (Michillinda) N/A 0
Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Bike Volume
Northbound (Michillinda) 8:30 AM 2
Southbound (Michillinda) 5:15 PM 2
Westbound (Montecito) 8:30 AM 1
Eastbound (Valley View) 5:15 PM 2
Page | 31
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is not met for this location.

B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

Not
Satisfied
There were no reported collisions in a recent 12-month period that would be corrected by an all-way stop.

Page | 32
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM
8 AM
12 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6PM
Major 300 168 714 727 842 575 694 854 744 731 543
Minor 200 112 58 68 66 44 42 68 66 56 57
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averaged 714 vph and 58 vph respectively, on an average day. The major street satisfies the minimum average volume of 300 vph but the minor street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 200 vph for the eight highest hours. Therefore, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Warrant D is not satisfied.

Page | 33
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Not
Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the study intersection.

1. The peak hour left-turn volumes are low and there were no observed leftturn conflicts.

2. There pedestrian volumes are low and there are no conflicts.

3. There are no sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. The two roadways are not collector through streets and all-way stop will not improve the operational characteristics.

Based on the data collected, none of the warrants for an all-way stop are satisfied for the intersection of Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue.

Recommendations
The vehicle volumes on Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue and the pedestrian and bicycle data for the intersection show are low. Additionally, there have been no collisions at the intersection in the records since May 5, 2020 that would be corrected by the installation of an all-way stop-controlled intersection. A review of the warrants for an allway stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is not warranted. The data also does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). Therefore, it is recommended that the intersection remain as is and that no further traffic controls be implemented.

Page | 34
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
West Grand View Avenue Parking Analysis
Willdan has evaluated the parking demand on West Grand View Avenue between Michillinda Avenue and North Baldwin Avenue to determine the feasibility of installing “No Parking” along one side of the street on this segment. This segment is displayed below.

West Grand View Avenue is classified as a Minor Arterial in the Sierra Madre General Plan. The street is 36 feet wide, and parking is allowed on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.

Parking Inventory
An inventory of the existing number of parking spaces and the parking restrictions for West Grand View Avenue was taken for this analysis. Table 1, below, indicates the number of spaces between segments and the existing parking restrictions (if any). The parking spaces were estimated by the length of the available parking area. The data sheets from the parking occupancy survey can be found in Attachment D.

Table 1
Existing Parking Restrictions
Street From To Side of the
Street
Restriction Approximate
Spaces
W Grand View Ave Michillinda Ave Wilson St S No Parking on City Streets 2am – 5am
28 W Grand View Ave Wilson St Jameson Ct S No Restrictions 39 W Grand View Ave Jameson Ct N. Lima St S No Restrictions 23 W Grand View Ave N. Lima St Auburn Ave S No Restrictions 53 W Grand View Ave Auburn Av N. Baldwin Ave S No Restrictions 25 W Grand View Ave N. Baldwin Ave Auburn Ave N No Restrictions 23 W Grand View Ave Auburn Ave N. Lima St N No Restrictions 53 W Grand View Ave N. Lima St Sunnyside Ave N No Restrictions 50 W Grand View Ave Sunnyside Ave Michillinda Ave N No Restrictions 36 West Grand View Ave
Michillinda Ave
N. Baldwin Ave
N
Page | 35
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Parking Occupancy
To assess the current usage of the on-street parking along West Grand View Avenue, a count of the cars parked in the available spaces was taken every hour for six hours on a weekday (Wednesday) and a weekend (Saturday). The number of cars parked along the segment were counted on Wednesday, May 28, 2025, and Saturday, May 31, 2025.

Different hours for the count were chosen on the weekday versus the weekend to reflect the peak traffic times for the segment. The hourly turnover counts were counted during the following hours for each day:
• Wednesday – 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM, 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM
• Saturday – 12:00 PM to 5:00 PM
The parking occupancy per hour was calculated from the count data received. Table 2, below, indicates the average occupancy for the north and south segments of West Grand View Avenue between Michillinda Avenue and North Baldwin Avenue. The occupancy count on Wednesday included three hours during the AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hours.

The table shows the averages for all six hours and for the three peak hours. The analysis indicates that the parking occupancy minimal and that the south side of West Grand View Avenue has a lower parking occupancy.

Table 2
Average Occupancy
Street
Side of
the
Street
Average Occupancy
Wednesday – May 28, 2025
W Grand View Ave N Overall = 8% (AM=6%, PM=8%)
W Grand View Ave S Overall = 5% (AM=4%, PM=7%)
Saturday – May 31, 2025
W Grand View Ave N 8%
W Grand View Ave S 5%
Recommendations
West Grand View Avenue is approximately 36 feet wide and with parking on either side that leaves approximately 10 feet for the westbound and eastbound traffic lanes, which has led to concerns during the busier traffic times. Therefore, the parking occupancy was studied to determine if restricting parking along the north or south sides of the street could be implemented to assist in traffic circulation. The parking study determined that the south side of West Grand View Avenue generally has the lower parking occupancy and would be the best choice for installing parking restrictions. The vehicular volume data indicates that along West Grand Avenue the highest peak hours are 7 AM to 10 AM and PM to 5 PM. It is recommended that peak hour parking restrictions be implemented for these peak hours along the south side of West Grand Avenue between Michillinda Avenue and North Baldwin Avenue on Monday through Friday to address circulation issues.

TO: Honorable Mayor Parkhurst and Members of the City Council FROM: James Carlson, Senior Analyst
Eric Lozick, Management Analyst
REVIEWED BY: Michael Bruckner, City Manager
Arnulfo Yanez, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 26, 2025
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SURVEYS AND TRAFFIC STUDIES REPORTS

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve recommendations contained within the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report (“Traffic Surveys”) with the exception of raising the speed limit on E. Sierra Madre Blvd. and the Traffic Study and On-Street Parking Management Plan on West Grand View Avenue (“Traffic Studies”).

ALTERNATIVES

1. The City Council provide additional recommendations to the Traffic Surveys and/or Traffic Studies.

2. The City Council direct staff to provide additional information.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City has contracted with Willdan Services to conduct two traffic related analysis. The Traffic Surveys are required to be done every 7 years for speed enforcement. The Traffic Studies have been conducted at the request of the City Council.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the recommendations of the Traffic Surveys, with the exception of raising the speed limit on E. Sierra Madre Blvd from 25 mph to 30 mph, and direct staff to enact the associated traffic control measures.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the recommendations of the Traffic Studies and direct staff to enact the associated traffic control measures.

City of Sierra Madre

AGENDA REPORT
Robert Parkhurst, Mayor
Kristine Lowe, Mayor Pro Tem
Edward Garcia, Council Member
Gene Goss, Council Member
Kelly Kriebs, Council Member
Sue Spears, City Treasurer

ANALYSIS
In March of 2025, the City of Sierra Madre issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Traffic Surveys and Traffic Studies. Three proposals were received as follows:

1. Willdan Engineering - $40,100

2. Transtech Engineers - $61,800

3. Fehr & Peers - $65,840
Each of the proposals were responsive and complete and the contract was awarded to the lowest bidder, Willdan Engineering. The Final 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report with associated 2025 ADT Data is attached to this report. The Final Traffic Study and On-Street Parking Management Plan on West Grand View Avenue are also attached.

TRAFFIC SURVEYS
The following locations were included in the surveys. They represent the same locations as previous studies (Woodland Drive was added most recently).

ID STREET SEGMENT
1 N. Baldwin Ave Highland Ave to Carter Ave
2 N. Baldwin Ave Sierra Madre Blvd to Highland Ave
3 S. Baldwin Ave Sierra Madre Blvd to Orange Grove Ave
4 E. Grand View Ave N. Baldwin Ave to Santa Anita Ave
5 W. Grand View Ave N. Baldwin Ave to Michillinda Ave
6 E. Highland Ave N. Baldwin Ave to N. Canon Ave
7 W. Highland Ave N. Baldwin Ave to Michillinda Ave
8 N. Lima St W. Sierra Madre Blvd to W. Carter Ave
9 S. Lima St W. Sierra Madre Blvd to W. Orange Grove Ave 10 S. Michillinda Ave W. Orange Grove Ave to W. Sierra Madre Blvd 11 N. Michillinda Ave W. Sierra Madre Blvd to North City Limit 12 N. Mountain Trail Ave E. Sierra Madre Blvd to E. Mira Monte Ave 13 S. Mountain Trail Ave E. Sierra Madre Blvd to E. Orange Grove Ave 14 E. Orange Grove Ave S. Baldwin Ave to East City Limit 15 W. Orange Grove Ave S. Baldwin Ave to S. Michillinda Ave 16 Santa Anita Ave E. Grandview Ave to Arno Dry
17 W. Sierra Madre Blvd Baldwin Ave to Lima St
18 E. Sierra Madre Blvd Baldwin Ave to East City Limit
19 W. Sierra Madre Blvd Lima St to Michillinda Ave
20 N. Sunnyside Ave W. Sierra Madre Blvd to North City Limit 21 S. Sunnyside Ave W. Sierra Madre Blvd to W. Orange Grove Ave 22 Woodland Drive Sturtevant Drive to North City Limit
Recommendations from these studies include the following:

E. Highland Ave. (entirety) – Reduce posted speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph W. Highland Ave. (entirety) – Reduce posted speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph W. Sierra Madre Blvd. (Lima St. to Baldwin Ave) – Reduce posted speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph E. Sierra Madre Blvd. (entirety) – Raise posted speed limit from 25 mph to 30 mph Staff is recommending that the City Council decline to enact the recommendation to raise the posted speed limit on E. Sierra Madre Blvd. Staff recognizes the community concern for school pedestrian traffic at E. Sierra Madre Blvd and N. Canon Ave and youth pedestrian traffic at Sierra Vista Park. A formal designation of a “Safety Corridor” may be required in the future for this section and may be brought back to City Council, as necessary.

TRAFFIC STUDIES
The City Council provided the following intersections for specific traffic studies:

ID SEGMENT RECOMMENDATION
1 Fairview Ave and N. Sunnyside Ave No change
2 S. Sunnyside Ave and Mariposa Ave
Move the stop signs from S. Sunnyside Ave.,
to Mariposa Ave.
3 N. Michillinda Ave and W. Grand View Ave No Change
4 E. Grand View Ave and N. Canon Ave.

Improve visibility of existing crosswalk and
bring corners up to current ADA standards.
5 W. Grand View Ave and Wilson St No Change
6 W. Highland Ave and N. Michillinda Ave No Change
The City Council also provided an additional request to study the parking situation on W. Grand View Ave. which was included in the study. The report recommends implementing peak hour parking restrictions, specifically “No Parking” on the south side of W. Grand View from N. Baldwin Ave to N.

Michillinda Ave. The “No Parking” would be in effect during the hours of 7:00am to 10:00am and 2:00pm to 5:00pm.

ENVIRONMENTAL(CEQA)
Minor traffic control adjustments are generally exempt from CEQA under section 14 CCR 15061(b)(3).

STRATEGIC PLAN CORRELATION
This report and staff recommendation is consistent with the following Sierra Madre Strategic Plan efforts:

Objective 2.4: “Develop and Implement a Safe Streets Initiative”.

Initiative PS 2.4.1: “Optimize Traffic Flow and Management” Project PS 2.4.1 A: “Development of Circulation Plan
Project PS 2.4.1 B: Traffic Survey for Major Streets
Project PS 2.4.1 C: Traffic Study for Selected Intersections

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of preparing the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report and the associated Traffic Studies, including the On-Street Parking Management Plan, is $40,100. This expense will be funded through the City’s allocation of Measure R Local Return. Specifically, the appropriation will be charged to Fund 38007 – Measure R, Segment 83500 – Street Maintenance, Object of Expenditure 56010 – Improvements Other Than Buildings (38007.83500.56010). No General Fund resources are required for this item.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies of this report can be accessed on the City’s website at www.sierramadre.ca.gov ATTACHMENTS:

1. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

2. 2025 ADT Data

3. Traffic Study and On-Street Parking Management Plan on West Grand View Ave. 2025 Engineering and
Traffic Survey Report
August 2025
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
August 6, 2025
James Carlson
Senior Analyst
City of Sierra Madre
232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd
Sierra Madre, CA 91024
Subject: Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) - 2025
Dear Mr. Carlson:

As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) to justify and update the posted speed limits along 22 street segments in the City of Sierra Madre. These segments were last surveyed in 2016 and require an update to comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&TS procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City’s arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices.

The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Revision 8 (California MUTCD) dated January 2024, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement.

We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Sierra Madre and the assistance, cooperation, and guidance afforded to us during the course of this study.

Very truly yours,

WILLDAN
Nicolle Spann, P.E., T.E.

Traffic Engineer
Enclosure
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Table of Contents
Introduction........................................................................................................3 Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey.......................................................................................4 Speed Sampling......................................................................................................................................4 Crash History..........................................................................................................................................6 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists......................................................................................6 Survey Conditions...............................................................................................6 Survey Locations........................................................................................................................................6 Data Collection ..........................................................................................................................................6 Speed Data.............................................................................................................................................6 Field Review Data ..................................................................................................................................7 Crash Data .............................................................................................................................................7 Analysis ..............................................................................................................7 Criteria.......................................................................................................................................................7 Results and Engineering and Traffic Survey Recommendations...............................................................8 Speed Limit Recommendations...........................................................................8 Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits...............................................................................9 Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes..........................................................12 Segments with Special Conditions.....................................................................13

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms

APPENDIX C
Survey Equipment

APPENDIX D
Legislative References
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
3 Introduction
This E&TS is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Sierra Madre. This E&TS presents recommended speed limits for 22 street segments in the City of Sierra Madre. E&T Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local, major, secondary, collector, and arterial streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. Historically, these surveys must be updated every 7 to 14 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions, and can be enforced per CVC Section 40802.

E&T Surveys are prepared under the direction of CVC Sections 627,22350-22359, and 40801-40803. The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by the California MUTCD Revision 8 (California MUTCD) dated January 2024.

Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43), signed in October 2021, has given local agencies more leeway in lowering and maintaining speed limits aimed at enhancing traffic safety. The California Vehicle Code was amended in 2022 and the California MUTCD was amended in March 2023 to implement laws and guidelines with the changes set forth in AB 43. There were three major changes to how speed limits can be recommended under AB 43 as follows:

1. An E&T Survey conducted more than 7 years ago may be extended to 14 years (previously to 10 years) if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)].

2. A local authority may establish and designate safety corridors throughout their jurisdiction. The local authority may recommend a speed limit with an additional five mile per hour reduction on segments designated as safety corridors. Local authorities may not lower a speed limit under this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide, whichever is sooner. Since the E&TS was completed in March 2025, this report reflects lowering speeds on these designating the roadway segments.

3. If a local authority, after completing an E&T Survey, finds that the speed limit is still reasonable or safe, the local authority may retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

This E&TS was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Police Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require E&T Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City’s Police Department(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)].

Posted speed limits are primarily established to protect the public by mitigating the risks posed by reckless and unpredictable driving behavior. The posted speed limits provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
4 reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually conducted to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.

The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California MUTCD and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes three elements of an E&T Survey:

1. Measurement of prevailing speed based on the 85th percentile rule

2. Accident history on the roadway

3. Roadway conditions and other relevant factors that are not readily apparent to the motorist.

Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey
The California MUTCD specifies the methodology to be used for completing E&T Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the E&TS are discussed in more detail as follows:

Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. A speed limit is established in the three options below.

Options:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed – A speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
5 ▪ California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by an additional 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. ▪ California MUTCD Option 2 - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85thpercentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b).

If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&T Survey shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, the 3 options may be applied as follows:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed - The 85th percentile speed would round up to the nearest 5- mph increment. The speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed.
▪ California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - The first step is to round up, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&T Survey. However, it is best to apply MUTCD Option 2 in these scenarios as it will not require documentation of conditions and justification to lower the speed limit.
▪ California MUTCD Option 2 - Instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied.

If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, the 3 options may be applied as follows:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed - The 85th percentile speed would round down to the nearest 5- mph increment. The speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed.
▪ California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - The first step is to round down, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&T Survey.
▪ California MUTCD Option 2 – This option is not applicable to 85th percentile speeds that already round down to the nearest 5-mph increment using the “Closest to 85th Percentile Speed” option. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
6 Crash History
Reported crashes reviewed from California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than expected average rate of crashes. A segment that has an above-average crash rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph below the basic speed limit.

The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning.

Conditions not readily apparent to motorists include the considerations of crash history, poor visibility, and the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians.

Survey Conditions
Survey Locations
The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Sierra Madre. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following:

1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.

2. Minimum visibility restrictions.

3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.

4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.

Data Collection
Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic crashes, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. ADT and field reviews were conducted at 22 locations during the month of May 2025.

Speed Data
Radar speed measurements were conducted at 22 locations during the month of May 2025. The radar speed distribution forms are in Appendix B. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
7 Field Review Data
A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors:

1. Street width and alignment;

2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics;

3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;

4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;

5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;

6. Visibility obstructions;

7. Land use and proximity to schools;

8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage;

9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and

10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.

Crash Data
Crash data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database. For this study, crash data was used from the latest 2 years of reported accidents from April 1, 2021 to March 31, 2024. The crash rates for the 22 segments are expressed in crashes per million vehicle miles (C/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the crash rate:

𝑹 =
𝑪 × 𝟏, 𝟎𝟎𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝒕 × 𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔
𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓
× 𝒍 × 𝒗
C = Number of midblock crashes over time period
R = Crash Rate (crashes/million vehicle miles)
t = Time Period Covered (in years)
l = Length of Segment (miles)
v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
The segment crash rate was then compared to the average statewide crash rate of similar roadways.

The average statewide crash rates were obtained from 2022 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans.

Analysis
Criteria
Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California MUTCD. Some of the criteria used are:
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
8 A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The “basic speed limit” is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed.

B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed.

C. The crash rate for each street segment is compared to average crash rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average crash rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Pinole.

Results and Engineering and Traffic Survey Recommendations The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed based on the guidelines for an Engineering and Traffic Survey set forth by the California MUTCD and the CVC. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 1. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements.

Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a crash rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report.

The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions.

Speed Limit Recommendations
The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.

Table 1 summarizes the data collected and recommended speed limit for each segment in this E&T Survey.

Table 2 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limit.

Table 1 - Summary of Recommendations
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate*
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
No. Limit Comments

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
1 Baldwin Ave Carter Ave Highland Ave 0.43 2,095 1.68 0.00 30** 31 23-32 80 % 30** Closest to 85th Speed Baldwin Ave Highland Ave Sierra Madre
Blvd
2 0.15 6,114 1.68 0.00 25** 27 19-28 83 % 25** Closest to 85th Speed 3 Grand View Ave Michillinda Ave Baldwin Ave 0.89 4,217 1.68 0.00 30** 34 24-33 65 % 30** California MUTCD Option 2 4 Grand View Ave Baldwin Ave Santa Anita Ave 1.16 3,774 1.68 0.13 30** 32 23-32 72 % 30** Closest to 85th Speed Baldwin Ave Sierra Madre Blvd Orange Grove
Ave
5 0.32 9,334 1.68 0.00 35 36 29-38 79 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed 6 Highland Ave Michillinda Ave Baldwin Ave 0.89 2,576 1.68 0.00 30** 28 19-28 79 % 25** California MUTCD Option 2 7 Highland Ave Baldwin Ave Canon Ave 0.42 880 1.68 0.00 30** 29 20-29 80 % 25** California MUTCD Option 2 Lima St Carter Ave Sierra Madre
Blvd
8 0.6 1,541 1.68 0.00 30 30 22-31 74 % 30 Closest to 85th Speed Lima St Sierra Madre Blvd Orange Grove
Ave
9 0.33 2,554 1.68 0.00 30 34 24-33 72 % 30 California MUTCD Option 2 Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate Act.: Actual Collision Rate
*Collision rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 9
Table 1 - Summary of Recommendations
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate*
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
No. Limit Comments

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Michillinda Ave North City Limit Sierra Madre
Blvd
10 0.76 5,303 1.68 0.00 35** 36 27-36 67 % 35** Closest to 85th Speed Michillinda Ave Sierra Madre Blvd Orange Grove
Ave
11 0.32 14,622 1.68 0.00 35** 36 27-36 70 % 35** Closest to 85th Speed Mountain Trail
Ave
Mira Monte Ave Sierra Madre
Blvd
12 0.5 2,681 1.68 0.00 30 31 21-30 70 % 30 Closest to 85th Speed Mountain Trail
Ave
Sierra Madre Blvd Orange Grove
Ave
13 0.32 4,349 1.68 0.00 30 32 23-32 74 % 30 Closest to 85th Speed Orange Grove
Ave
14 Machillinda Ave Baldwin Ave 0.85 8,214 1.68 0.08 35 37 26-35 71 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed Orange Grove
Ave
15 Baldwin Ave East City Limit 0.83 5,763 1.68 0.00 35 39 29-38 71 % 35 California MUTCD Option 2 16 Santa Anita Ave Arno Dr Grand View Ave 0.3 1,115 1.68 0.00 30 34 26-35 63 % 30 California MUTCD Option 2 Sierra Madre
Blvd
17 Michillinda Ave Lima St 0.81 8,686 1.68 0.00 30 33 24-33 76 % 30 California MUTCD Option 2 Sierra Madre
Blvd
18 Lima St Baldwin Ave 0.46 8,843 1.68 0.00 30 27 18-27 82 % 25 Closest to 85th Speed Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate Act.: Actual Collision Rate
*Collision rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 10
Table 1 - Summary of Recommendations
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate*
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
No. Limit Comments

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Sierra Madre
Blvd
19 Baldwin Ave East City Limit 0.39 6,689 1.68 0.21 25 34 26-35 74 % 30 California MUTCD Option 2 Sunnyside Ave North City Limit Sierra Madre
Blvd
20 0.61 959 1.68 0.00 30 30 20-29 74 % 30 Closest to 85th Speed Sunnyside Ave Sierra Madre Blvd Orange Grove
Ave
21 0.33 1,139 1.68 0.00 30 29 19-28 75 % 30 Closest to 85th Speed Woodland Dr North City Limit Sturtevant Dr 0.43 739 1.68 0.00 22 15-24 56 Residential Density, Hidden Driveways
22 15 % 15
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate Act.: Actual Collision Rate
*Collision rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 11
Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes No. Street From To Existing New Change

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
6 Highland Ave Michillinda Ave Baldwin Ave 30 25 - 5
7 Highland Ave Baldwin Ave Canon Ave 30 25 - 5
18 Sierra Madre Blvd Lima St Baldwin Ave 30 25 - 5
19 Sierra Madre Blvd Baldwin Ave East City Limit 25 30 + 5 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 12
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
13 Segments with Special Conditions
This section is meant to further explain the use of special conditions to lower the recommended speed limit lower than the 85th Percentile speed. These special conditions include the following:
▪ Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
▪ Residential Districts
▪ Land or Facilities that Generate High Concentrations of Pedestrians Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more above or below the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Each segment is discussed below.

Segment 22 – Woodland Drive – North City Limit to Sturtevant Drive This segment is currently posted at 15 mph and has one lane in each direction with an ADT of 739 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.43-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 22 mph and would normally justify a 20 mph posted speed limit. However, due to residential density with hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 15 mph for the above reason. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 1

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:14 AM
85th Percentile Speed 31
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.43
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, Church
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 2095
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Highland, Grand View, Uncontrolled @ Laurel, Algeria Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Baldwin Ave
FROM Carter Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Highland Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Carter, Grand View, Highland
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 1582
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 2

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:24 AM
85th Percentile Speed 27
50th Percentile Speed 23
10 mph Pace 19-28
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.15
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 25
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 6114
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lanes
Marked X-Walks @ Sierra Madre, Highland, Uncontrolled @ Montecito, Kersting Ct Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Baldwin Ave
FROM Highland Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sierra Madre Blvd
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre, Highland
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 5086
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 3

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/22/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:57 PM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 29
10 mph Pace 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.89
Sidewalks South Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 34
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 4217
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Baldwin, Auburn, Lima, Uncontrolled @ Olive Tree Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Grand View Ave
FROM Michillinda Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Baldwin Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting North Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Baldwin, Auburn, Lima, Sunnyside, Michillinda Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 2410
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 4

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/22/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:55 PM
85th Percentile Speed 32
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.13
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 1.16
Sidewalks South Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, Church
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 3774
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Mountain Trail, Baldwin, Uncontrolled @ Canon Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Grand View Ave
FROM Baldwin Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Santa Anita Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Great
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Santa Anita, Mountain Trail, Baldwin Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 2416
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 5

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.32
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 9334
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lanes
Marked X-Walks @ Sierra Madre, Uncontrolled @ Mariposa
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Baldwin Ave
FROM Sierra Madre Blvd

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Orange Grove Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre Blvd, Orange Grove Ave Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 8363
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 6

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:26 PM
85th Percentile Speed 28
50th Percentile Speed 24
10 mph Pace 19-28
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.89
Sidewalks South Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 38
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 25
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 2576
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Baldwin, Auburn, Uncontrolled @ Hermosa Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Highland Ave
FROM Michillinda Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Baldwin Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides, Few
Traffic Control Stop @ Baldwin, Auburn, Lima, Sunnyside, Michillinda Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 1561
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 7

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:23 AM
85th Percentile Speed 29
50th Percentile Speed 26
10 mph Pace 20-29
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.42
Sidewalks South Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 37
Adjacent Land Use School, Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 25
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 149
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 880
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Baldwin, Canon, Uncontrolled @ Hermosa Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Highland Ave
FROM Baldwin Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Canon Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting North Side, Few
Traffic Control Stop @ Baldwin, Mountain Trail, Canon
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 251
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 8

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/20/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:51 PM
85th Percentile Speed 30
50th Percentile Speed 26
10 mph Pace 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.60
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Trailhead, Church
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 1541
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Highland, Sierra Madre
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Lima St
FROM Carter Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sierra Madre Blvd
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Carter, Grand View, Highland, Sierra Madre Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 1132
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 9

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:01 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 28
10 mph Pace 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.33
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 2554
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Sierra Madre
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Lima St
FROM Sierra Madre Blvd

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Orange Grove Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre, Orange Grove
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 1947
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 10

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/22/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:35 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.76
Sidewalks Both Sides, West Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 48
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 5303
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ TS
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Michillinda Ave
FROM North City Limit

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sierra Madre Blvd
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control TS @ Sierra Madre
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 3996
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 11

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/22/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:02 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.32
Sidewalks West Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 48
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 14622
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ TS
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Michillinda Ave
FROM Sierra Madre Blvd

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Orange Grove Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control TS @ Sierra Madre, Orange Grove
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 10853
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 12

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 3:16 PM
85th Percentile Speed 31
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 21-30
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.50
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 2681
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Stop
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Mountain Trail Ave
FROM Mira Monte Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sierra Madre Blvd
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre, Highland, Grand View Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 2219
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 13

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:00 PM
85th Percentile Speed 32
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.32
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 45
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 4349
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Sierra Madre
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Mountain Trail Ave
FROM Sierra Madre Blvd

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Orange Grove Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre, Orange Grove
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 3394
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 14

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:32 PM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.08
On-Street Parking None
Segment Length 0.85
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 34
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 8214
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @TS
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Orange Grove Ave
FROM Machillinda Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Baldwin Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting South Side, Few
Traffic Control Stop @ Baldwin, TS @ Michillinda
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 3443
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 15

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:21 PM
85th Percentile Speed 39
50th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.83
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 35-38
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 5763
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks None
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Orange Grove Ave
FROM Baldwin Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
East City Limit
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting None
Traffic Control Stop @ Orange Grove Ave, Michillinda Ave Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 5557
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 16

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/19/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:43 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 28
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking West Side
Segment Length 0.30
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 78
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 99
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 1115
Number of Lanes 2, Raised Median Separating Grade
Marked X-Walks None
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Santa Anita Ave
FROM Arno Dr

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Grand View Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Grand View
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 1978
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 17

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:20 AM
85th Percentile Speed 33
50th Percentile Speed 28
10 mph Pace 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.81
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 45
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 8686
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @Stop, Uncontrolled @ Canon, Coburn
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Sierra Madre Blvd
FROM Michillinda Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Lima St
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Lima, Sunnyside, Michillinda
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 6491
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 18

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:40 AM
85th Percentile Speed 27
50th Percentile Speed 23
10 mph Pace 18-27
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.46
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Library, Commercial
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 25
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 8843
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lanes
Marked X-Walks @ TS, Sunnyside, Uncontrolled @ Park
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Sierra Madre Blvd
FROM Lima St

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Baldwin Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Modreate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control TS @ Michillinda, Stop @ Sunnyside, Lima Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 6652
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 19

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/21/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.21
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.39
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Fire Station
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 6689
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Stop, Uncontrolled @ Hermosa, Auburn, Windsor, Kersting Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Sierra Madre Blvd
FROM Baldwin Ave

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
East City Limit
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
Traffic Control Stop @ Lima, Baldwin
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 4754
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 20

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/19/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:51 PM
85th Percentile Speed 30
50th Percentile Speed 25
10 mph Pace 20-29
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.61
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 116
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 959
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks @ Sierra Madre
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Sunnyside Ave
FROM North City Limit

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sierra Madre Blvd
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Sierra Madre, Highland, Grand View Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 528
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 21

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/22/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:53 AM
85th Percentile Speed 29
50th Percentile Speed 23
10 mph Pace 19-28
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.33
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 35
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 120
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 1139
Number of Lanes 2
Marked X-Walks None
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Sunnyside Ave
FROM Sierra Madre Blvd

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Orange Grove Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side
Traffic Control Stop @ Orange Grove, Mariposa, Sierra Madre Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 747
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 22

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Date of Speed Survey 5/19/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:31 AM
85th Percentile Speed 22
50th Percentile Speed 20
10 mph Pace 15-24
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 56
Posted Speed Limit 15
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68
Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Segment Length 0.43
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 18-20
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By DK Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within The City of Sierra Madre was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
crashes/MVM
miles feet
Speed Limit 15
Residential Density, Hidden Driveways
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 61
Average Daily Traffic Weekday (ADT) 739
Number of Lanes 1-2
Marked X-Walks None
Date of Weekday ADT 5/15/2025
Date Range 1/1/2022-12/31/2024
%
STREET Woodland Dr
FROM North City Limit

CERTIFICATION DATE TO
Sturtevant Dr
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting None
Traffic Control Stop @ Sturtevant
Average Daily Traffic Weekend (ADT) 596
Date of Weekend ADT 5/17/2025
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:14AM 11:17AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HIGHLAND AVE AND CARTER AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 257 BALDWIN AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 30 31 31 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 27 27 27 M.P.H.
37 X 1 0 1
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 22 23 23 M.P.H.
35 X 0 1 1 *
34 X X X X 1 3 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 20 - 29 23 - 32 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 P % IN PACE: 81% 81% 80%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 C % OVER PACE: 4% 18% 6% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 1% 14% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12 25 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 27 27 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 14 14 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12
22 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X 2 7 9
20 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.15 0.07 19 X X 2 0 2
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.39 0.26 M.P.H.
17 X 0 1 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

BALDWIN AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:24AM 10:11AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND HIGHLAND AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 94 BALDWIN AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 27 27 27 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 23 24 23 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 19 20 20 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 X 0 1 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 19 - 28 20 - 29 19 - 28 M.P.H. 33 X 0 1 1 *
32 X X X X 1 3 4 P % IN PACE: 80% 86% 83%
31 X X X 2 1 3 A
30 X X X X 0 4 4 C % OVER PACE: 9% 6% 10%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 E
28 X X X X X X 4 2 6 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 7% 7%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 24 24 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9 21 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 13 13 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 13 23 22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15
20 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.13 0.07 19 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14
18 X X X X X X 4 2 6 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.36 0.26 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X X 5 1 6
16 X X 2 0 2
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

BALDWIN AVENUE
DATE: 05/22/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 12:57PM 1:50PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND MICHILLINDA AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 520 GRANDVIEW AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 1 0 1
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 X 0 1 1
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 33 35 34 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 X X 1 1 2 50TH %: 27 29 29 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 1 3 4
36 X X X 0 3 3 15TH %: 22 23 23 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 P % IN PACE: 70% 62% 65%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 C % OVER PACE: 21% 23% 18% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 15% 17% 27 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 3 13 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 29 28 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 31 29 23 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
22 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X 2 1 3
20 X X X X X 4 1 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.33 0.14 19 X 0 1 1
18 X X X X X 3 2 5 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.58 0.38 M.P.H. 17 X X X 0 3 3
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

GRANDVIEW AVENUE
DATE: 05/22/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 1:55PM 3:11PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND SANTA ANITA AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 92 GRANDVIEW AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X 1 0 1
40 X X 1 1 2 85TH %: 33 32 32 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 X X 2 0 2 50TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X X X 2 1 3 15TH %: 23 21 22 M.P.H.
35 X X X 3 0 3 *
34 X X X X 2 2 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 20 - 29 23 - 32 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 P % IN PACE: 70% 76% 72% 31 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 C % OVER PACE: 16% 16% 12% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 8% 16% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 13 19 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 26 27 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14
24 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 30 21 26
23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
22 X X X X X 2 3 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
20 X X X X X 2 3 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.30 0.23 0.13 19 X X X X 1 3 4
18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.48 0.36 M.P.H. 17 X X 1 1 2
16 X X 2 0 2
15 X X X X X 2 3 5
100 100 200

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

GRANDVIEW AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:21AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 182 BALDWIN AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X X 2 0 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X 1 0 1
41 0 0 0
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 37 36 36 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 X X X X X X X 6 1 7 50TH %: 33 32 32 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 15TH %: 29 27 27 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 17 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 28 - 37 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 P % IN PACE: 83% 79% 79% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 C % OVER PACE: 4% 2% 3% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 E
28 X X X X X 1 4 5 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 19% 18%
27 X X X X X X X X X 2 7 9 *
26 X X X X 3 1 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 32 32 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9
24 X X X X 2 2 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 17 18
23 X X 1 1 2
22 X 1 0 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.18 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.42 0.42 0.30 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

BALDWIN AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 1:26PM 2:46PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND MICHILLINDA AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF ADAMS AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 29 27 28 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 26 23 24 M.P.H.
37 X 1 0 1
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 21 19 20 M.P.H.
35 X 1 0 1 *
34 0 0 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 19 - 28 19 - 28 M.P.H.
33 X 1 0 1 *
32 X X 1 1 2 P % IN PACE: 82% 81% 79%
31 X X X 2 1 3 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 C % OVER PACE: 6% 6% 12%
29 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 2 12 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 13% 9% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10 24 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 25 23 24 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 13 17 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 16 17 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 11 16 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16
20 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.16 0.16 0.09 19 X X X X X X X X X 2 7 9
18 X X 0 2 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.40 0.30 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
16 X X X 1 2 3
15 X X X X X 1 4 5
100 100 200
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

HIGHLAND AVENUE
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 11:23AM 1:23PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND CANON AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF MERRILL AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 29 31 29 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 26 25 26 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X 1 0 1 15TH %: 21 21 21 M.P.H.
35 X 0 1 1 *
34 X X X 0 3 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 20 - 29 20 - 29 M.P.H. 33 X X X 2 1 3 *
32 X X X X X X 3 3 6 P % IN PACE: 84% 76% 80%
31 X X X X 2 2 4 A
30 X X X 3 0 3 C % OVER PACE: 10% 16% 15%
29 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14 * % UNDER PACE: 6% 7% 5% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 25 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14
24 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 22 18
23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13
22 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13
20 X X X X X X 2 4 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.32 0.12 19 X X 0 2 2
18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.42 0.57 0.34 M.P.H. 17 X X 1 1 2
16 X X X 1 2 3
15 0 0 0
81 68 149

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

HIGHLAND AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/20/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:51PM 4:38PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND CARTER AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 212 LIMA ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 31 29 30 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 26 25 26 M.P.H.
37 X 0 1 1
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 21 20 21 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 X X X 2 1 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 20 - 29 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 X X X X 3 1 4 *
32 X X X X X 5 0 5 P % IN PACE: 76% 80% 74%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 5 15 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 C % OVER PACE: 6% 8% 7%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 11% 19% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 25 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 19 20 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19
22 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10
20 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.19 0.10 19 X X X X X X 4 2 6
18 X X X 1 2 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.44 0.32 M.P.H. 17 X X 1 1 2
16 X X X X X 2 3 5
15 X X X X 1 3 4
100 100 200

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

LIMA STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 11:01AM 12:27PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 40 LIMA ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X X 2 0 2
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 0 0 0
40 X X 2 0 2 85TH %: 36 33 34 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 X X X X X 4 1 5 50TH %: 29 27 28 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X 5 1 6
36 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 15TH %: 26 23 24 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *
34 X X X 1 2 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 20 - 29 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 P % IN PACE: 73% 76% 72%
31 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 C % OVER PACE: 23% 23% 17% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 1% 10% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 27 29 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 11 18
24 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 20 24 23 X X X X X X 1 5 6
22 X X X X X X 2 4 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X 1 2 3
20 X X X X 0 4 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.22 0.12
19 X 0 1 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.47 0.35 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

LIMA STREET
DATE: 05/22/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:35AM 10:19AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND NORTH CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1056 MICHILLINDA AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 0 0 0
40 X X X X X 1 4 5 85TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 3 3 6
38 X X X X X X 2 4 6 50TH %: 32 29 31 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 3 2 5
36 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 15TH %: 27 23 25 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 3 13 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 P % IN PACE: 78% 55% 67% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 C % OVER PACE: 10% 15% 12% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 30% 21% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 *
26 X X X X X 2 3 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 30 31 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9
24 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 34 26 23 X X X 0 3 3
22 X X X X X X X 1 6 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 6 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X 0 3 3
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.37 0.13
19 X 0 1 1
18 X X 0 2 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.43 0.60 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

MICHILLINDA AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/22/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:02AM 9:31AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF CANFIELD AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X X 2 0 2
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X 2 0 2
41 X X X X X 5 0 5
40 X X 0 2 2 85TH %: 38 35 36 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
38 X X X X X 5 0 5 50TH %: 33 32 32 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 2 2 4
36 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 15TH %: 26 25 26 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 13 22 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 P % IN PACE: 65% 75% 70%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 12 14 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 C % OVER PACE: 19% 9% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 * % UNDER PACE: 16% 16% 16% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 *
26 X X X X 4 0 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 31 32 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X 3 3 6
24 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 29 24 27
23 X X X X X X 2 4 6
22 X X X 1 2 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X 0 3 3
20 X X 1 1 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.26 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.51 0.37 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

MICHILLINDA AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 3:16PM 4:21PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND MIRA MONTE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 53 MOUNTAIN TRAIL AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 32 31 31 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X X 1 1 2 50TH %: 27 26 27 M.P.H.
37 X X X 2 1 3
36 X X X X 3 1 4 15TH %: 21 22 21 M.P.H.
35 X X X 1 2 3 *
34 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 20 - 29 21 - 30 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
32 X X X 2 1 3 P % IN PACE: 67% 78% 70%
31 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 C % OVER PACE: 21% 16% 19% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 5% 11% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 13 23 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 26 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 12 18
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 21 24 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12
22 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10
20 X X X X X X 2 4 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.23 0.12 19 X X X X X 2 3 5
18 X X X X X X 4 2 6 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.48 0.34 M.P.H. 17 X X X 3 0 3
16 X 1 0 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

MOUNTAIN TRAIL AVENUE
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 2:00PM 3:12PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 70 MOUNTAIN TRAIL AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X X 1 1 2
40 X X X X 1 3 4 85TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.
39 X X 1 1 2
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H.
37 X X 1 1 2
36 X X X X 2 2 4 15TH %: 24 23 23 M.P.H.
35 X X X X 3 1 4 *
34 X X X 2 1 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 20 - 29 23 - 32 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 P % IN PACE: 75% 77% 74%
31 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 C % OVER PACE: 11% 21% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7 19 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 2% 12% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 27 28 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 13 22
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 27 24 23 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10
22 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X 1 1 2
20 X X X X X 2 3 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.30 0.12 19 X X X X 3 1 4
18 X X 2 0 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.54 0.35 M.P.H. 17 X 1 0 1
16 X 0 1 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

MOUNTAIN TRAIL AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 12:32PM 1:17PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND MICHILLINDA AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: EAST OF SUNNYSIDE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 0 0 0
45 X X 2 0 2
44 X 0 1 1
43 X X X X 2 2 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X 1 2 3
41 X X X X 3 1 4
40 X X X 2 1 3 85TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
38 X X X 2 1 3 50TH %: 29 33 31 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 1 4 5
36 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 15TH %: 26 28 26 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 11 13 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 12 18 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 28 - 37 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 12 16 P % IN PACE: 75% 73% 71% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 C % OVER PACE: 21% 14% 21% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4 18 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 13% 8% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 2 15 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 33 32 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
24 X X X 2 1 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 29 24 28
23 X X 1 1 2
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.26 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.51 0.37 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

ORANGE GROVE AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 1:21PM 1:52PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND EAST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 61 ORANGE GROVE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 1 0 1
48 X 1 0 1
47 X X 1 1 2
46 X X X X X 3 2 5
45 X X X 2 1 3
44 X X X 1 2 3
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X 1 2 3
41 X X X X 2 2 4
40 X X X X 1 3 4 85TH %: 39 39 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X 5 2 7
38 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 50TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 15TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 13 21 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 P % IN PACE: 68% 73% 71% 31 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 A
30 X X X X X X 3 3 6 C % OVER PACE: 18% 16% 17%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 E
28 X X X X X 4 1 5 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 10% 12%
27 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *
26 X X X 2 1 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 34 34 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X 3 2 5
24 X X 1 1 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31 26 28
23 X 1 0 1
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.31 0.26 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.51 0.38 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

ORANGE GROVE AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/19/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 11:43AM 1:43PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GRANDVIEW AVE AND ARNO DR 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF OAKWOOD PLACE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X 0 1 1
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 32 35 34 M.P.H.
39 X X 0 2 2
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 27 31 28 M.P.H.
37 X X 1 1 2
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 22 21 22 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
34 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 X X X X 2 2 4 *
32 X X X X X 2 3 5 P % IN PACE: 75% 63% 63%
31 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 A
30 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 C % OVER PACE: 19% 12% 6%
29 X X X X X X 4 2 6 E
28 X X X X X 3 2 5 * % UNDER PACE: 6% 24% 30%
27 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 *
26 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 30 28 M.P.H. 25 X X X X 3 1 4
24 X X X X X 3 2 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 37 29
23 X X X X 3 1 4
22 X X X X X X 6 0 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 6 5 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 X X X X 1 3 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.91 0.29
19 X X X 1 2 3
18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.96 0.54 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
52 47 99
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

SANTA ANITA AVENUE
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 10:20AM 10:56AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LIMA ST AND MICHILLINDA AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 425 SIERRA MADRE BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X 0 1 1
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 31 35 33 M.P.H.
39 X X 0 2 2
38 X X X 2 1 3 50TH %: 28 29 28 M.P.H.
37 X 0 1 1
36 X X X X X 1 4 5 15TH %: 23 26 25 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X 0 7 7 *
34 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 26 - 35 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14 P % IN PACE: 83% 77% 76% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 C % OVER PACE: 8% 10% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7 20 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 13% 11% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 30 29 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4 16
24 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 20 19
23 X X X X X X X X 7 1 8
22 X X X 2 1 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X X X X 3 1 4
20 X X X X X 3 2 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.21 0.09 19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.46 0.30 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 9:40AM 10:16AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND LIMA ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 161 SIERRA MADRE BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 24 23 23 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 19 18 18 M.P.H.
35 X 1 0 1 *
34 X 0 1 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 18 - 27 17 - 26 18 - 27 M.P.H. 33 X X 1 1 2 *
32 X 0 1 1 P % IN PACE: 81% 86% 82%
31 X 1 0 1 A
30 X X X X X 3 2 5 C % OVER PACE: 16% 10% 11%
29 X X X X X 4 1 5 E
28 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 4% 7%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 22 23 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 13 25 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 14 15 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11
20 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.15 0.07 19 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
18 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.38 0.27 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10
16 X X X X 0 4 4
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD
DATE: 05/21/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:35AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN AVE AND EAST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 361 SIERRA MADRE BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 0 0 0
40 X X X 3 0 3 85TH %: 35 34 34 M.P.H.
39 X X 0 2 2
38 X X X 2 1 3 50TH %: 30 31 31 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 3 2 5
36 X X X X X 1 4 5 15TH %: 26 24 25 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 14 22 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6 18 P % IN PACE: 79% 69% 74% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 C % OVER PACE: 10% 11% 10% 29 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 20% 16% 27 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 30 30 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
24 X X X X X X X 0 7 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 24 22
23 X X X X X X 2 4 6
22 X X X X X X 4 2 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X 1 2 3
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.20 0.26 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.51 0.33 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD
DATE: 05/19/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 1:51PM 3:51PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND NORTH CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 126 SUNNYSIDE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 29 31 30 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 24 25 25 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X 0 1 1 15TH %: 20 20 20 M.P.H.
35 X 1 0 1 *
34 X X 1 1 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 20 - 29 20 - 29 20 - 29 M.P.H. 33 X X 1 1 2 *
32 X X X X 1 3 4 P % IN PACE: 76% 72% 74%
31 X X X X X 3 2 5 A
30 X X X X X 1 4 5 C % OVER PACE: 13% 16% 14%
29 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 E
28 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 12% 12%
27 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 *
26 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 25 25 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
24 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 22 21 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13
22 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X 5 1 6
20 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.43 0.18 19 X X X 0 3 3
18 X X X X 3 1 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.57 0.66 0.42 M.P.H. 17 X X 1 1 2
16 X X X 2 1 3
15 X 1 0 1
62 54 116

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/22/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 10:53AM 12:53PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SIERRA MADRE BLVD AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 35 SUNNYSIDE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 29 28 29 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 22 24 23 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 19 19 19 M.P.H.
35 X X 2 0 2 *
34 0 0 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 18 - 27 20 - 29 19 - 28 M.P.H.
33 X X 1 1 2 *
32 X 0 1 1 P % IN PACE: 75% 77% 75%
31 X X X X X X 4 2 6 A
30 X X X 0 3 3 C % OVER PACE: 20% 6% 15%
29 X X X X X X 2 4 6 E
28 X X X X X 2 3 5 * % UNDER PACE: 5% 16% 10%
27 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
26 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 24 23 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 10 13 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 17 19 23 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
22 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
20 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.27 0.16 19 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
18 X X X 3 0 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.64 0.52 0.40 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X 2 3 5
16 X X X 1 2 3
15 X 0 1 1
55 65 120

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 05/19/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 9:31AM 11:31AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): STURTEVANT DR AND NORTH CITY LIMIT 60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 561 WOODLAND DR 58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0
56 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 15 MPH OBSERVER: 55 0 0 0
54 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER: 53 0 0 0
52 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0
35 0 0 0 85TH %: 22 23 22 M.P.H. 34 0 0 0
33 0 0 0 50TH %: 20 20 20 M.P.H. 32 0 0 0
31 0 0 0 15TH %: 16 16 16 M.P.H. 30 0 0 0 * 29 0 0 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 15 - 24 15 - 24 15 - 24 M.P.H. 28 0 0 0 * 27 0 0 0 P % IN PACE: 52% 59% 56% 26 0 0 0 A 25 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE: 0% 0% 0% 24 0 0 0 E 23 0 0 0 * % UNDER PACE: 48% 41% 44% 22 0 0 0 * 21 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 19 19 19 M.P.H. 20 0 0 0 19 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 7 7 7 18 X X X X X X 2 4 6
17 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3 3 3 M.P.H. 16 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 15 X X X X X X X X X X X 2 9 11 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.18 0.11 14 X X X X X 2 3 5 13 X X X X 2 2 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.43 0.33 M.P.H. 12 X X X X X X 5 1 6 11 X X X X X X 3 3 6 10 X X X X X X 2 4 6
29 32 61
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
TO

WOODLAND DRIVE
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE

APPENDIX C
Survey Equipment
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Survey Equipment Used
The radar equipment used by City Traffic Counters to collect speed measurements for this survey was a Stalker-II SDR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar and a Stalker-ATR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar both manufactured by Applied Concepts of Plano, Texas. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the units were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Stalker-II SDR Hand-Held Traffic Radar and Stalker-ATR Model HandHeld Traffic Radar were last calibrated on January 16, 2023 by Southern California Radar/Laser Certification Laboratory.

2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE

APPENDIX D
Legislative References
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code
The following sections of the CVC are from the most recently published CVC as of August 2023 and contain new sections pertaining to AB 43.

Engineering and Traffic Surveys
Section 627.
(a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses of business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Basic Speed Law
Section 22350.

No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations
Section 22351.
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22352.

The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. (2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.

Section 22357.1.

Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children’s 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 mile per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted.

Section 22358.4
(a)
(1) Wherever a local authority determines upon the basis on an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is more than reasonable or safe, the local authority my, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected up on the highway.
(b)
(1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior and after the school zone.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5)
(A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) For the purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at a distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from school grounds.

Residence Districts
Section 515.

A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district,
(a)
upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or
(b)
within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Business Activity Districts
Section 22358.9.
(c)
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the flowing conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (d) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that a portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (e) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (f) A local authority shall issue only warning citation for violation of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Minimum and Maximum Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22357.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.

Section 22358.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 45, 40, 35, 30, 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Section 22358.3.

Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Section 22360.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the speed limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a highway other than a state highway for a distance of not exceeding 2,000 feet in length between district, either business or residence, the local authority may determine and declare a reasonable and safe prima facie limit thereon lower than 65 mile per hour, but not less than 25 miles per hour, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street or highway.

Downward Speed Zoning
Section 22358.5.

It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Safety Corridors (Added code from AB 43)
Section 22358.7.
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) A portion of the highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(3) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government code, whichever is sooner.
(4) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Maintaining Posted Speeds (Added code from AB 43)
Section 22358.8.
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Boundary Line Streets
Section 22359.

With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Speed Trap Prohibition
Section 40801.

No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

Speed Trap
Section 40802.
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
(2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
(b)
(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
(3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour of 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (c)
(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
(C)
(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B)
(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

Speed Trap Evidence
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Section 40803.
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.

When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
2025 ADT Data
Weekday & Weekend Data 2025
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200

Page 1 ends

Baldwin Avenue Btwn
Highland Avenue & Carter Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 3 24 0 10
12:15 1 24 1 16
12:30 0 25 0 20
12:45 1 11 5 84 1 14 2 60 7 144
01:00 1 16 0 13
01:15 0 28 0 15
01:30 0 26 0 12
01:45 0 19 1 89 0 12 0 52 1 141
02:00 0 21 0 12
02:15 0 22 0 11
02:30 0 19 0 20
02:45 0 31 0 93 0 11 0 54 0 147
03:00 1 31 0 52
03:15 1 17 0 16
03:30 0 18 1 14
03:45 0 17 2 83 0 20 1 102 3 185
04:00 0 18 3 17
04:15 0 13 0 22
04:30 0 22 1 29
04:45 0 15 0 68 0 11 4 79 4 147
05:00 1 20 2 8
05:15 1 8 3 17
05:30 0 11 3 13
05:45 2 12 4 51 3 14 11 52 15 103
06:00 4 12 12 10
06:15 4 16 8 15
06:30 6 12 7 5
06:45 11 21 25 61 10 13 37 43 62 104
07:00 11 23 3 7
07:15 19 20 13 9
07:30 30 13 27 14
07:45 33 12 93 68 62 6 105 36 198 104
08:00 22 13 42 6
08:15 14 12 10 3
08:30 15 11 19 3
08:45 17 18 68 54 24 5 95 17 163 71
09:00 30 13 19 2
09:15 12 8 16 5
09:30 18 10 13 3
09:45 20 8 80 39 8 6 56 16 136 55
10:00 23 5 14 5
10:15 16 7 5 7
10:30 19 3 20 1
10:45 30 5 88 20 11 5 50 18 138 38
11:00 15 1 14 0
11:15 26 3 11 1
11:30 16 0 14 1
11:45 13 1 70 5 12 1 51 3 121 8
Total 436 715 412 532 848 1247
Percent 37.9% 62.1% 43.6% 56.4% 40.5% 59.5%
Grand
Total 436 715 412 532 848 1247
Percent 37.9% 62.1% 43.6% 56.4% 40.5% 59.5%
ADT ADT 2,095 AADT 2,095

Page 1 ends

Baldwin Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Boulevard & Highland Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 6 67 0 59
12:15 1 53 1 54
12:30 1 55 2 56
12:45 3 60 11 235 1 36 4 205 15 440
01:00 4 50 0 53
01:15 0 55 0 54
01:30 1 57 0 40
01:45 1 55 6 217 1 34 1 181 7 398
02:00 0 65 0 51
02:15 1 56 0 86
02:30 1 66 0 59
02:45 2 85 4 272 1 56 1 252 5 524
03:00 1 64 1 103
03:15 1 64 0 60
03:30 0 58 1 55
03:45 3 63 5 249 2 49 4 267 9 516
04:00 1 57 7 55
04:15 0 61 6 53
04:30 1 62 3 44
04:45 2 74 4 254 6 58 22 210 26 464
05:00 5 58 9 53
05:15 8 52 7 37
05:30 3 58 12 28
05:45 7 54 23 222 11 48 39 166 62 388
06:00 9 47 18 40
06:15 9 61 13 28
06:30 23 58 30 27
06:45 40 56 81 222 26 43 87 138 168 360
07:00 29 60 32 45
07:15 38 48 36 22
07:30 78 41 55 31
07:45 85 37 230 186 105 25 228 123 458 309
08:00 69 24 99 30
08:15 54 32 47 17
08:30 52 30 50 22
08:45 46 22 221 108 46 20 242 89 463 197
09:00 40 25 50 12
09:15 42 21 38 20
09:30 37 25 44 17
09:45 47 15 166 86 34 19 166 68 332 154
10:00 36 16 46 21
10:15 31 13 32 16
10:30 49 8 47 9
10:45 48 5 164 42 35 9 160 55 324 97
11:00 48 6 50 7
11:15 40 6 33 6
11:30 48 3 45 6
11:45 49 7 185 22 43 1 171 20 356 42
Total 1100 2115 1125 1774 2225 3889
Percent 34.2% 65.8% 38.8% 61.2% 36.4% 63.6%
Grand
Total 1100 2115 1125 1774 2225 3889
Percent 34.2% 65.8% 38.8% 61.2% 36.4% 63.6%
ADT ADT 6,114 AADT 6,114

Page 1 ends

Grand View Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Michillinda Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 1 33 0 42
12:15 0 63 1 32
12:30 1 33 4 23
12:45 1 19 3 148 0 21 5 118 8 266
01:00 0 35 0 31
01:15 0 38 0 20
01:30 2 42 0 23
01:45 0 41 2 156 0 28 0 102 2 258
02:00 0 52 0 33
02:15 0 38 0 40
02:30 0 31 2 36
02:45 0 56 0 177 0 34 2 143 2 320
03:00 0 73 0 58
03:15 0 54 0 48
03:30 0 51 1 38
03:45 0 39 0 217 0 25 1 169 1 386
04:00 0 50 0 32
04:15 1 45 0 31
04:30 0 50 1 33
04:45 0 44 1 189 2 29 3 125 4 314
05:00 3 54 2 35
05:15 0 60 1 32
05:30 1 48 3 28
05:45 3 42 7 204 3 17 9 112 16 316
06:00 1 46 5 28
06:15 2 41 7 20
06:30 4 36 10 26
06:45 8 34 15 157 20 20 42 94 57 251
07:00 11 32 19 19
07:15 19 28 21 15
07:30 66 9 59 15
07:45 142 20 238 89 99 6 198 55 436 144
08:00 69 15 138 10
08:15 24 21 79 13
08:30 32 11 47 15
08:45 36 6 161 53 45 7 309 45 470 98
09:00 34 9 45 3
09:15 11 9 48 10
09:30 35 12 43 7
09:45 21 7 101 37 22 5 158 25 259 62
10:00 36 3 24 4
10:15 25 5 49 1
10:30 50 7 27 6
10:45 32 4 143 19 22 1 122 12 265 31
11:00 22 3 41 2
11:15 20 4 32 1
11:30 29 1 29 2
11:45 38 1 109 9 26 0 128 5 237 14
Total 780 1455 977 1005 1757 2460
Percent 34.9% 65.1% 49.3% 50.7% 41.7% 58.3%
Grand
Total 780 1455 977 1005 1757 2460
Percent 34.9% 65.1% 49.3% 50.7% 41.7% 58.3%
ADT ADT 4,217 AADT 4,217

Page 1 ends

Grand View Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Santa Anita Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 1 29 3 30
12:15 1 33 0 42
12:30 0 35 2 23
12:45 1 49 3 146 0 39 5 134 8 280
01:00 0 49 0 34
01:15 1 47 0 37
01:30 0 54 1 29
01:45 0 19 1 169 0 22 1 122 2 291
02:00 1 31 1 20
02:15 0 42 1 22
02:30 0 26 3 25
02:45 1 33 2 132 0 46 5 113 7 245
03:00 0 61 0 28
03:15 0 37 0 26
03:30 0 48 0 23
03:45 0 38 0 184 0 23 0 100 0 284
04:00 0 38 0 24
04:15 0 36 0 27
04:30 1 41 1 17
04:45 1 46 2 161 2 22 3 90 5 251
05:00 2 30 0 34
05:15 3 50 2 18
05:30 1 37 2 20
05:45 4 38 10 155 1 18 5 90 15 245
06:00 3 29 1 20
06:15 7 33 8 25
06:30 8 31 10 17
06:45 8 28 26 121 18 14 37 76 63 197
07:00 10 16 12 18
07:15 7 17 34 10
07:30 32 26 57 16
07:45 55 13 104 72 73 17 176 61 280 133
08:00 55 10 35 14
08:15 24 11 55 24
08:30 36 14 33 8
08:45 46 6 161 41 42 13 165 59 326 100
09:00 50 11 48 9
09:15 22 3 55 12
09:30 23 6 57 11
09:45 31 7 126 27 44 11 204 43 330 70
10:00 47 0 46 6
10:15 16 5 58 7
10:30 61 6 32 6
10:45 48 5 172 16 31 4 167 23 339 39
11:00 29 2 38 3
11:15 40 0 43 3
11:30 28 2 28 1
11:45 25 1 122 5 20 1 129 8 251 13
Total 729 1229 897 919 1626 2148
Percent 37.2% 62.8% 49.4% 50.6% 43.1% 56.9%
Grand
Total 729 1229 897 919 1626 2148
Percent 37.2% 62.8% 49.4% 50.6% 43.1% 56.9%
ADT ADT 3,774 AADT 3,774

Page 1 ends

Baldwin Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Orange Grove Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 10 90 0 105
12:15 5 78 6 100
12:30 6 66 1 93
12:45 6 89 27 323 6 74 13 372 40 695
01:00 6 72 2 79
01:15 0 58 1 79
01:30 3 65 2 63
01:45 3 67 12 262 0 82 5 303 17 565
02:00 2 73 2 92
02:15 1 77 0 111
02:30 4 71 1 108
02:45 3 88 10 309 1 103 4 414 14 723
03:00 1 60 2 111
03:15 2 83 1 87
03:30 0 69 3 83
03:45 4 79 7 291 1 82 7 363 14 654
04:00 2 71 8 76
04:15 2 69 12 82
04:30 5 65 11 86
04:45 3 76 12 281 7 87 38 331 50 612
05:00 6 56 19 88
05:15 10 75 17 83
05:30 10 74 24 50
05:45 15 66 41 271 29 67 89 288 130 559
06:00 15 59 30 66
06:15 24 65 41 68
06:30 30 62 45 78
06:45 49 72 118 258 53 84 169 296 287 554
07:00 46 62 59 75
07:15 59 52 53 53
07:30 94 50 76 63
07:45 113 50 312 214 119 52 307 243 619 457
08:00 97 39 127 41
08:15 92 39 102 32
08:30 77 41 93 43
08:45 76 32 342 151 85 37 407 153 749 304
09:00 83 38 64 38
09:15 67 38 66 55
09:30 64 35 83 35
09:45 66 26 280 137 62 29 275 157 555 294
10:00 66 30 72 32
10:15 65 20 67 30
10:30 78 22 95 15
10:45 77 14 286 86 75 20 309 97 595 183
11:00 65 12 79 29
11:15 61 7 79 18
11:30 66 8 83 11
11:45 67 9 259 36 67 3 308 61 567 97
Total 1706 2619 1931 3078 3637 5697
Percent 39.4% 60.6% 38.6% 61.4% 39.0% 61.0%
Grand
Total 1706 2619 1931 3078 3637 5697
Percent 39.4% 60.6% 38.6% 61.4% 39.0% 61.0%
ADT ADT 9,334 AADT 9,334

Page 1 ends

Highland Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Michillinda Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 42 0 41
12:15 1 21 2 28
12:30 0 17 1 15
12:45 0 20 3 100 0 13 3 97 6 197
01:00 0 25 0 15
01:15 0 20 1 7
01:30 0 11 0 7
01:45 0 29 0 85 0 16 1 45 1 130
02:00 0 53 0 27
02:15 0 21 0 53
02:30 0 14 0 27
02:45 0 40 0 128 0 35 0 142 0 270
03:00 0 29 0 33
03:15 0 39 0 21
03:30 0 34 0 22
03:45 0 24 0 126 0 22 0 98 0 224
04:00 0 28 0 22
04:15 0 29 0 21
04:30 0 28 1 22
04:45 0 43 0 128 0 15 1 80 1 208
05:00 0 38 1 23
05:15 3 25 1 20
05:30 1 29 2 20
05:45 2 36 6 128 4 36 8 99 14 227
06:00 1 25 0 22
06:15 6 17 7 27
06:30 1 10 9 11
06:45 8 19 16 71 11 15 27 75 43 146
07:00 2 11 13 15
07:15 8 9 17 8
07:30 34 17 46 12
07:45 54 14 98 51 83 9 159 44 257 95
08:00 46 8 106 3
08:15 13 5 62 7
08:30 19 8 24 4
08:45 16 4 94 25 21 8 213 22 307 47
09:00 6 5 15 7
09:15 11 2 11 2
09:30 8 3 15 7
09:45 14 4 39 14 7 7 48 23 87 37
10:00 9 4 19 4
10:15 21 1 10 3
10:30 5 3 19 3
10:45 9 1 44 9 12 0 60 10 104 19
11:00 9 2 13 2
11:15 17 1 13 1
11:30 17 1 21 1
11:45 37 0 80 4 21 0 68 4 148 8
Total 380 869 588 739 968 1608
Percent 30.4% 69.6% 44.3% 55.7% 37.6% 62.4%
Grand
Total 380 869 588 739 968 1608
Percent 30.4% 69.6% 44.3% 55.7% 37.6% 62.4%
ADT ADT 2,576 AADT 2,576

Page 1 ends

Highland Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Canon Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 47 0 34
12:15 0 9 2 16
12:30 0 4 0 12
12:45 0 3 0 63 0 2 2 64 2 127
01:00 0 4 0 2
01:15 0 4 0 1
01:30 0 3 0 0
01:45 0 3 0 14 0 0 0 3 0 17
02:00 0 4 0 2
02:15 0 4 0 1
02:30 0 5 0 2
02:45 0 8 0 21 0 4 0 9 0 30
03:00 0 10 0 3
03:15 0 6 0 8
03:30 0 5 0 1
03:45 0 2 0 23 0 1 0 13 0 36
04:00 0 6 0 4
04:15 0 5 0 1
04:30 0 5 0 3
04:45 1 14 1 30 0 2 0 10 1 40
05:00 0 13 0 3
05:15 0 20 0 3
05:30 2 8 0 26
05:45 1 0 3 41 0 36 0 68 3 109
06:00 1 4 2 28
06:15 0 9 1 8
06:30 2 6 2 15
06:45 2 11 5 30 0 12 5 63 10 93
07:00 2 2 1 8
07:15 4 0 6 4
07:30 4 4 9 1
07:45 36 1 46 7 20 0 36 13 82 20
08:00 107 1 41 0
08:15 13 1 17 1
08:30 2 0 5 0
08:45 5 3 127 5 6 2 69 3 196 8
09:00 1 0 1 1
09:15 2 1 2 1
09:30 3 0 3 1
09:45 2 0 8 1 1 0 7 3 15 4
10:00 2 2 5 0
10:15 3 0 4 0
10:30 2 0 4 0
10:45 7 1 14 3 3 1 16 1 30 4
11:00 3 0 2 0
11:15 6 0 5 0
11:30 5 0 4 0
11:45 20 0 34 0 8 0 19 0 53 0
Total 238 238 154 250 392 488
Percent 50.0% 50.0% 38.1% 61.9% 44.5% 55.5%
Grand
Total 238 238 154 250 392 488
Percent 50.0% 50.0% 38.1% 61.9% 44.5% 55.5%
ADT ADT 880 AADT 880

Page 1 ends

Lima Street Btwn
Sierra Madre Boulevard & Carter Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 3 19 1 11
12:15 2 27 1 20
12:30 0 13 2 10
12:45 0 10 5 69 0 13 4 54 9 123
01:00 0 15 0 16
01:15 0 7 0 12
01:30 1 10 0 9
01:45 0 20 1 52 0 7 0 44 1 96
02:00 0 30 0 15
02:15 0 18 0 17
02:30 0 21 0 8
02:45 0 18 0 87 0 13 0 53 0 140
03:00 0 22 0 24
03:15 0 25 0 12
03:30 0 16 0 15
03:45 0 14 0 77 0 5 0 56 0 133
04:00 1 14 0 10
04:15 0 14 2 9
04:30 0 13 3 8
04:45 0 24 1 65 0 11 5 38 6 103
05:00 0 19 3 10
05:15 1 18 3 7
05:30 3 18 0 7
05:45 2 10 6 65 4 8 10 32 16 97
06:00 0 16 2 10
06:15 4 8 2 4
06:30 9 11 5 6
06:45 8 8 21 43 10 5 19 25 40 68
07:00 7 14 12 4
07:15 7 10 15 6
07:30 28 7 13 3
07:45 29 12 71 43 28 5 68 18 139 61
08:00 10 9 27 3
08:15 9 7 11 3
08:30 16 7 14 4
08:45 12 6 47 29 26 4 78 14 125 43
09:00 12 2 15 3
09:15 10 10 14 2
09:30 8 5 9 3
09:45 5 2 35 19 6 0 44 8 79 27
10:00 10 2 13 0
10:15 12 3 15 0
10:30 17 2 13 0
10:45 13 2 52 9 14 1 55 1 107 10
11:00 6 3 14 1
11:15 13 0 13 1
11:30 17 0 9 1
11:45 21 0 57 3 18 1 54 4 111 7
Total 296 561 337 347 633 908
Percent 34.5% 65.5% 49.3% 50.7% 41.1% 58.9%
Grand
Total 296 561 337 347 633 908
Percent 34.5% 65.5% 49.3% 50.7% 41.1% 58.9%
ADT ADT 1,541 AADT 1,541

Page 1 ends

Lima Street Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Orange Grove Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 27 0 25
12:15 0 29 0 27
12:30 0 22 2 17
12:45 0 21 2 99 1 23 3 92 5 191
01:00 0 23 3 30
01:15 1 14 0 35
01:30 1 19 0 19
01:45 0 27 2 83 1 9 4 93 6 176
02:00 1 29 1 17
02:15 1 19 0 34
02:30 1 24 0 25
02:45 0 28 3 100 0 15 1 91 4 191
03:00 0 30 0 34
03:15 2 33 0 17
03:30 0 25 0 28
03:45 0 23 2 111 1 14 1 93 3 204
04:00 2 22 0 16
04:15 0 31 3 15
04:30 0 24 3 16
04:45 1 25 3 102 2 25 8 72 11 174
05:00 2 24 1 23
05:15 3 27 5 11
05:30 4 23 5 17
05:45 5 20 14 94 2 12 13 63 27 157
06:00 1 17 8 19
06:15 3 19 5 15
06:30 8 22 11 13
06:45 8 19 20 77 10 17 34 64 54 141
07:00 16 16 12 16
07:15 14 18 22 17
07:30 41 18 21 14
07:45 27 15 98 67 48 11 103 58 201 125
08:00 27 11 45 12
08:15 26 13 25 10
08:30 28 9 17 9
08:45 27 9 108 42 28 9 115 40 223 82
09:00 28 7 11 8
09:15 16 8 17 7
09:30 18 12 20 2
09:45 21 7 83 34 17 3 65 20 148 54
10:00 23 4 23 3
10:15 28 7 26 2
10:30 16 4 24 3
10:45 14 4 81 19 21 1 94 9 175 28
11:00 15 6 25 2
11:15 23 1 23 1
11:30 19 0 18 1
11:45 24 1 81 8 14 1 80 5 161 13
Total 497 836 521 700 1018 1536
Percent 37.3% 62.7% 42.7% 57.3% 39.9% 60.1%
Grand
Total 497 836 521 700 1018 1536
Percent 37.3% 62.7% 42.7% 57.3% 39.9% 60.1%
ADT ADT 2,554 AADT 2,554

Page 1 ends

Michillinda Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & North City Limit

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 3 34 3 66
12:15 2 14 2 53
12:30 2 8 3 49
12:45 1 6 8 62 1 65 9 233 17 295
01:00 2 14 2 52
01:15 0 39 0 43
01:30 1 43 2 39
01:45 0 46 3 142 0 77 4 211 7 353
02:00 0 52 1 51
02:15 1 60 0 80
02:30 0 48 0 64
02:45 0 34 1 194 0 69 1 264 2 458
03:00 1 43 0 81
03:15 0 39 0 91
03:30 1 30 1 62
03:45 0 36 2 148 1 62 2 296 4 444
04:00 0 38 0 63
04:15 0 32 2 36
04:30 1 42 2 47
04:45 1 36 2 148 3 29 7 175 9 323
05:00 0 32 3 52
05:15 1 52 6 63
05:30 4 29 12 42
05:45 5 38 10 151 13 49 34 206 44 357
06:00 3 39 15 39
06:15 12 32 21 29
06:30 7 26 27 38
06:45 13 43 35 140 32 38 95 144 130 284
07:00 20 23 41 28
07:15 22 22 48 27
07:30 28 22 62 18
07:45 53 15 123 82 102 27 253 100 376 182
08:00 52 22 107 18
08:15 61 15 87 25
08:30 56 14 89 15
08:45 55 20 224 71 69 13 352 71 576 142
09:00 43 21 57 33
09:15 40 11 56 16
09:30 31 11 44 13
09:45 46 20 160 63 44 7 201 69 361 132
10:00 42 16 52 7
10:15 40 7 42 6
10:30 32 6 35 3
10:45 45 12 159 41 53 3 182 19 341 60
11:00 36 6 45 3
11:15 47 9 55 5
11:30 39 4 55 2
11:45 39 3 161 22 57 1 212 11 373 33
Total 888 1264 1352 1799 2240 3063
Percent 41.3% 58.7% 42.9% 57.1% 42.2% 57.8%
Grand
Total 888 1264 1352 1799 2240 3063
Percent 41.3% 58.7% 42.9% 57.1% 42.2% 57.8%
ADT ADT 5,303 AADT 5,303

Page 1 ends

Michillinda Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Orange Grove Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 9 124 8 127
12:15 4 130 6 113
12:30 5 84 3 102
12:45 4 92 22 430 3 107 20 449 42 879
01:00 4 80 1 99
01:15 1 79 2 101
01:30 4 57 2 116
01:45 3 82 12 298 1 106 6 422 18 720
02:00 0 76 0 122
02:15 0 104 0 164
02:30 0 133 0 160
02:45 1 146 1 459 1 230 1 676 2 1135
03:00 0 129 1 298
03:15 3 118 0 248
03:30 2 102 2 265
03:45 2 137 7 486 3 292 6 1103 13 1589
04:00 2 114 1 286
04:15 2 109 2 235
04:30 3 121 5 220
04:45 4 121 11 465 6 192 14 933 25 1398
05:00 4 97 9 235
05:15 3 101 10 220
05:30 12 93 12 206
05:45 23 100 42 391 27 214 58 875 100 1266
06:00 24 112 22 248
06:15 36 86 27 179
06:30 54 70 44 150
06:45 68 77 182 345 41 137 134 714 316 1059
07:00 86 59 58 109
07:15 105 69 91 97
07:30 141 58 117 73
07:45 197 62 529 248 137 69 403 348 932 596
08:00 177 67 212 58
08:15 131 56 164 104
08:30 136 55 138 117
08:45 109 37 553 215 128 78 642 357 1195 572
09:00 107 48 101 45
09:15 84 42 82 31
09:30 89 35 92 35
09:45 86 42 366 167 74 32 349 143 715 310
10:00 92 28 77 22
10:15 79 25 84 24
10:30 91 27 106 25
10:45 73 26 335 106 93 10 360 81 695 187
11:00 71 13 113 20
11:15 89 17 112 12
11:30 95 10 111 12
11:45 85 4 340 44 86 8 422 52 762 96
Total 2400 3654 2415 6153 4815 9807
Percent 39.6% 60.4% 28.2% 71.8% 32.9% 67.1%
Grand
Total 2400 3654 2415 6153 4815 9807
Percent 39.6% 60.4% 28.2% 71.8% 32.9% 67.1%
ADT ADT 14,622 AADT 14,622

Page 1 ends

Mountain Trail Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Mira Monte Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 3 28 1 31
12:15 3 32 0 31
12:30 2 22 1 24
12:45 2 20 10 102 0 27 2 113 12 215
01:00 0 19 0 19
01:15 2 22 0 28
01:30 1 23 0 18
01:45 1 24 4 88 0 27 0 92 4 180
02:00 0 23 0 28
02:15 2 21 0 16
02:30 0 27 0 20
02:45 0 38 2 109 1 21 1 85 3 194
03:00 1 15 0 42
03:15 0 24 0 22
03:30 0 17 1 17
03:45 0 16 1 72 0 20 1 101 2 173
04:00 1 18 0 27
04:15 0 14 1 14
04:30 2 14 2 22
04:45 0 18 3 64 3 28 6 91 9 155
05:00 0 27 6 19
05:15 0 16 7 27
05:30 2 31 5 22
05:45 1 26 3 100 7 18 25 86 28 186
06:00 3 32 16 12
06:15 3 24 10 17
06:30 8 29 13 18
06:45 8 18 22 103 18 11 57 58 79 161
07:00 3 21 21 16
07:15 8 21 19 16
07:30 30 18 39 6
07:45 32 13 73 73 54 7 133 45 206 118
08:00 35 15 38 11
08:15 20 13 25 9
08:30 29 13 26 5
08:45 23 19 107 60 19 3 108 28 215 88
09:00 21 11 22 12
09:15 16 16 25 6
09:30 15 13 25 4
09:45 21 8 73 48 26 2 98 24 171 72
10:00 23 7 19 3
10:15 16 6 20 6
10:30 16 7 21 2
10:45 22 4 77 24 27 3 87 14 164 38
11:00 20 8 27 2
11:15 13 4 19 3
11:30 17 6 26 0
11:45 21 6 71 24 35 1 107 6 178 30
Total 446 867 625 743 1071 1610
Percent 34.0% 66.0% 45.7% 54.3% 39.9% 60.1%
Grand
Total 446 867 625 743 1071 1610
Percent 34.0% 66.0% 45.7% 54.3% 39.9% 60.1%
ADT ADT 2,681 AADT 2,681

Page 1 ends

Mountain Trail Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Orange Grove Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 46 1 70
12:15 6 45 1 43
12:30 4 29 2 33
12:45 2 28 16 148 0 49 4 195 20 343
01:00 1 23 0 27
01:15 3 30 0 36
01:30 1 33 0 30
01:45 1 38 6 124 0 45 0 138 6 262
02:00 1 33 1 36
02:15 0 30 0 40
02:30 0 56 0 36
02:45 0 70 1 189 1 47 2 159 3 348
03:00 1 40 2 71
03:15 0 33 0 43
03:30 0 27 1 38
03:45 0 24 1 124 0 40 3 192 4 316
04:00 1 32 0 44
04:15 0 23 1 48
04:30 2 22 2 34
04:45 1 38 4 115 6 43 9 169 13 284
05:00 0 31 7 45
05:15 1 32 13 39
05:30 5 48 8 41
05:45 5 31 11 142 8 29 36 154 47 296
06:00 2 33 21 20
06:15 7 26 10 39
06:30 16 36 23 37
06:45 19 24 44 119 27 22 81 118 125 237
07:00 14 25 25 31
07:15 22 28 26 29
07:30 65 26 52 16
07:45 101 15 202 94 80 11 183 87 385 181
08:00 88 24 73 17
08:15 47 19 42 14
08:30 49 20 31 8
08:45 37 19 221 82 29 8 175 47 396 129
09:00 34 10 31 17
09:15 17 20 40 14
09:30 22 18 31 5
09:45 29 10 102 58 34 4 136 40 238 98
10:00 37 11 42 6
10:15 23 7 27 7
10:30 24 10 34 6
10:45 40 7 124 35 39 3 142 22 266 57
11:00 31 7 36 1
11:15 25 6 32 3
11:30 26 6 28 1
11:45 46 6 128 25 39 2 135 7 263 32
Total 860 1255 906 1328 1766 2583
Percent 40.7% 59.3% 40.6% 59.4% 40.6% 59.4%
Grand
Total 860 1255 906 1328 1766 2583
Percent 40.7% 59.3% 40.6% 59.4% 40.6% 59.4%
ADT ADT 4,349 AADT 4,349

Page 1 ends

Orange Grove Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Michillinda Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 3 67 1 87
12:15 2 54 1 79
12:30 2 50 1 47
12:45 1 57 8 228 2 49 5 262 13 490
01:00 1 49 0 45
01:15 1 49 0 54
01:30 1 59 1 50
01:45 2 60 5 217 1 43 2 192 7 409
02:00 1 57 0 60
02:15 1 62 1 65
02:30 0 74 0 64
02:45 0 92 2 285 0 68 1 257 3 542
03:00 0 134 0 74
03:15 2 118 0 75
03:30 0 125 0 77
03:45 0 130 2 507 0 90 0 316 2 823
04:00 1 160 0 66
04:15 0 118 0 63
04:30 2 133 4 70
04:45 1 121 4 532 3 69 7 268 11 800
05:00 1 153 2 80
05:15 3 159 3 63
05:30 4 136 5 57
05:45 9 128 17 576 3 78 13 278 30 854
06:00 4 114 10 73
06:15 5 128 13 70
06:30 9 92 22 66
06:45 14 78 32 412 20 60 65 269 97 681
07:00 11 56 41 49
07:15 26 42 63 34
07:30 40 56 127 44
07:45 67 38 144 192 184 40 415 167 559 359
08:00 86 35 200 23
08:15 48 25 146 24
08:30 44 22 151 24
08:45 56 24 234 106 150 22 647 93 881 199
09:00 49 25 111 23
09:15 34 14 63 20
09:30 40 19 46 7
09:45 32 13 155 71 55 11 275 61 430 132
10:00 32 14 54 12
10:15 49 9 52 3
10:30 30 8 48 6
10:45 49 5 160 36 51 6 205 27 365 63
11:00 41 6 62 6
11:15 42 2 44 2
11:30 54 7 66 0
11:45 55 4 192 19 72 1 244 9 436 28
Total 955 3181 1879 2199 2834 5380
Percent 23.1% 76.9% 46.1% 53.9% 34.5% 65.5%
Grand
Total 955 3181 1879 2199 2834 5380
Percent 23.1% 76.9% 46.1% 53.9% 34.5% 65.5%
ADT ADT 8,214 AADT 8,214

Page 1 ends

Orange Grove Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & East City Limit

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 42 0 34
12:15 3 35 2 28
12:30 2 33 1 26
12:45 2 45 9 155 0 21 3 109 12 264
01:00 1 36 1 25
01:15 2 40 0 27
01:30 0 29 0 25
01:45 1 46 4 151 4 23 5 100 9 251
02:00 1 49 0 38
02:15 0 55 0 30
02:30 0 81 0 51
02:45 0 73 1 258 0 58 0 177 1 435
03:00 1 104 0 38
03:15 0 124 0 41
03:30 0 118 1 48
03:45 0 115 1 461 0 48 1 175 2 636
04:00 1 134 2 34
04:15 1 139 0 32
04:30 0 128 1 23
04:45 4 99 6 500 1 28 4 117 10 617
05:00 1 138 1 39
05:15 3 158 1 33
05:30 5 153 5 38
05:45 7 123 16 572 11 28 18 138 34 710
06:00 3 101 3 21
06:15 4 124 14 32
06:30 4 84 18 19
06:45 19 62 30 371 26 33 61 105 91 476
07:00 11 62 28 20
07:15 10 22 55 22
07:30 22 21 92 10
07:45 47 24 90 129 96 17 271 69 361 198
08:00 49 22 73 15
08:15 29 15 116 13
08:30 32 11 159 13
08:45 27 9 137 57 96 7 444 48 581 105
09:00 31 15 65 18
09:15 24 14 41 9
09:30 28 5 41 8
09:45 29 6 112 40 31 7 178 42 290 82
10:00 37 10 29 4
10:15 31 10 31 4
10:30 38 3 29 5
10:45 44 4 150 27 34 3 123 16 273 43
11:00 42 1 36 5
11:15 23 1 39 1
11:30 32 7 25 2
11:45 27 3 124 12 35 3 135 11 259 23
Total 680 2733 1243 1107 1923 3840
Percent 19.9% 80.1% 52.9% 47.1% 33.4% 66.6%
Grand
Total 680 2733 1243 1107 1923 3840
Percent 19.9% 80.1% 52.9% 47.1% 33.4% 66.6%
ADT ADT 5,763 AADT 5,763

Page 1 ends

Santa Anita Avenue Btwn
Grand View Avenue & Arno Drive

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 6 0 15
12:15 2 15 0 8
12:30 0 5 0 17
12:45 0 9 2 35 0 6 0 46 2 81
01:00 0 9 0 8
01:15 0 15 0 7
01:30 0 12 0 15
01:45 0 12 0 48 0 11 0 41 0 89
02:00 1 15 0 16
02:15 0 5 0 7
02:30 0 13 0 18
02:45 0 8 1 41 0 10 0 51 1 92
03:00 0 10 0 16
03:15 0 8 0 7
03:30 0 13 2 6
03:45 0 9 0 40 0 8 2 37 2 77
04:00 0 7 0 6
04:15 1 4 1 6
04:30 0 9 0 11
04:45 0 15 1 35 1 12 2 35 3 70
05:00 0 13 0 7
05:15 1 4 1 8
05:30 3 7 1 7
05:45 3 5 7 29 1 10 3 32 10 61
06:00 3 8 3 15
06:15 6 8 3 8
06:30 3 4 2 5
06:45 8 3 20 23 3 7 11 35 31 58
07:00 9 9 2 7
07:15 16 4 13 13
07:30 8 10 5 10
07:45 11 1 44 24 8 11 28 41 72 65
08:00 21 5 13 12
08:15 5 10 4 5
08:30 12 1 7 0
08:45 20 3 58 19 4 2 28 19 86 38
09:00 13 5 4 4
09:15 14 5 4 0
09:30 12 1 10 0
09:45 14 5 53 16 8 0 26 4 79 20
10:00 6 2 7 2
10:15 14 0 3 2
10:30 10 2 20 0
10:45 6 2 36 6 13 3 43 7 79 13
11:00 9 1 15 0
11:15 5 2 9 1
11:30 14 0 11 1
11:45 9 1 37 4 8 0 43 2 80 6
Total 259 320 186 350 445 670
Percent 44.7% 55.3% 34.7% 65.3% 39.9% 60.1%
Grand
Total 259 320 186 350 445 670
Percent 44.7% 55.3% 34.7% 65.3% 39.9% 60.1%
ADT ADT 1,115 AADT 1,115

Page 1 ends

Sierra Madre Boulevard Btwn
Lima Street & Michillinda Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 3 97 2 87
12:15 1 81 4 90
12:30 1 76 3 81
12:45 2 65 7 319 1 64 10 322 17 641
01:00 1 87 2 67
01:15 0 71 1 52
01:30 1 75 2 47
01:45 1 96 3 329 0 56 5 222 8 551
02:00 1 96 1 69
02:15 0 92 1 80
02:30 0 89 0 79
02:45 0 125 1 402 1 75 3 303 4 705
03:00 1 110 2 91
03:15 1 114 0 84
03:30 1 116 1 79
03:45 0 143 3 483 0 72 3 326 6 809
04:00 2 131 0 69
04:15 1 121 2 56
04:30 1 106 3 70
04:45 2 128 6 486 1 62 6 257 12 743
05:00 5 116 3 73
05:15 4 125 6 62
05:30 5 155 4 50
05:45 16 135 30 531 10 52 23 237 53 768
06:00 8 100 3 59
06:15 11 114 11 51
06:30 17 79 16 54
06:45 32 74 68 367 28 62 58 226 126 593
07:00 20 51 42 64
07:15 40 58 45 34
07:30 62 41 80 44
07:45 83 38 205 188 120 29 287 171 492 359
08:00 93 27 109 27
08:15 73 41 111 38
08:30 62 43 101 19
08:45 66 24 294 135 80 28 401 112 695 247
09:00 57 35 68 20
09:15 53 29 56 20
09:30 63 31 51 17
09:45 72 19 245 114 55 20 230 77 475 191
10:00 49 25 75 18
10:15 59 14 51 14
10:30 52 13 48 7
10:45 74 16 234 68 43 7 217 46 451 114
11:00 75 7 58 5
11:15 84 9 62 1
11:30 89 5 64 6
11:45 94 3 342 24 57 7 241 19 583 43
Total 1438 3446 1484 2318 2922 5764
Percent 29.4% 70.6% 39.0% 61.0% 33.6% 66.4%
Grand
Total 1438 3446 1484 2318 2922 5764
Percent 29.4% 70.6% 39.0% 61.0% 33.6% 66.4%
ADT ADT 8,686 AADT 8,686

Page 1 ends

Sierra Madre Boulevard Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Lima Street

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 89 1 100
12:15 0 80 1 95
12:30 0 86 1 76
12:45 2 67 2 322 2 53 5 324 7 646
01:00 0 86 2 56
01:15 0 75 0 38
01:30 0 65 2 51
01:45 0 99 0 325 0 64 4 209 4 534
02:00 0 102 0 68
02:15 0 86 1 96
02:30 0 107 1 74
02:45 0 100 0 395 0 70 2 308 2 703
03:00 0 111 0 92
03:15 0 115 0 86
03:30 2 116 1 70
03:45 0 128 2 470 0 79 1 327 3 797
04:00 0 130 1 74
04:15 1 129 1 71
04:30 1 103 1 74
04:45 0 144 2 506 3 71 6 290 8 796
05:00 7 113 2 67
05:15 7 142 4 54
05:30 5 147 5 55
05:45 11 139 30 541 7 60 18 236 48 777
06:00 12 107 9 65
06:15 10 123 16 61
06:30 10 86 20 57
06:45 24 67 56 383 27 67 72 250 128 633
07:00 19 49 37 62
07:15 34 60 39 42
07:30 62 48 82 32
07:45 118 42 233 199 119 21 277 157 510 356
08:00 107 29 118 34
08:15 67 38 105 25
08:30 55 34 108 24
08:45 72 27 301 128 91 24 422 107 723 235
09:00 54 32 78 28
09:15 60 31 61 25
09:30 59 30 65 17
09:45 65 21 238 114 46 22 250 92 488 206
10:00 55 21 72 16
10:15 57 17 54 6
10:30 57 7 56 11
10:45 75 11 244 56 54 10 236 43 480 99
11:00 72 11 65 7
11:15 92 5 74 3
11:30 83 4 68 1
11:45 112 6 359 26 56 1 263 12 622 38
Total 1467 3465 1556 2355 3023 5820
Percent 29.7% 70.3% 39.8% 60.2% 34.2% 65.8%
Grand
Total 1467 3465 1556 2355 3023 5820
Percent 29.7% 70.3% 39.8% 60.2% 34.2% 65.8%
ADT ADT 8,843 AADT 8,843

Page 1 ends

Sierra Madre Boulevard Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & East City Limit

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 76 4 152
12:15 2 60 2 81
12:30 1 46 2 43
12:45 1 35 4 217 0 43 8 319 12 536
01:00 0 39 0 32
01:15 1 40 0 34
01:30 0 31 0 31
01:45 1 45 2 155 0 37 0 134 2 289
02:00 0 51 0 37
02:15 0 64 1 41
02:30 0 59 0 54
02:45 0 50 0 224 0 64 1 196 1 420
03:00 1 64 0 49
03:15 1 73 0 56
03:30 0 69 0 56
03:45 0 63 2 269 0 62 0 223 2 492
04:00 0 74 1 65
04:15 0 91 0 63
04:30 0 88 1 49
04:45 1 81 1 334 5 63 7 240 8 574
05:00 4 99 3 70
05:15 6 97 6 72
05:30 6 121 8 82
05:45 4 114 20 431 8 72 25 296 45 727
06:00 7 71 15 70
06:15 5 85 21 79
06:30 8 49 25 61
06:45 11 41 31 246 24 64 85 274 116 520
07:00 18 31 42 70
07:15 19 29 47 37
07:30 43 25 87 40
07:45 93 22 173 107 137 40 313 187 486 294
08:00 142 18 162 20
08:15 63 25 118 19
08:30 44 28 109 11
08:45 40 25 289 96 84 19 473 69 762 165
09:00 26 17 57 18
09:15 18 16 34 11
09:30 37 9 48 14
09:45 28 22 109 64 49 10 188 53 297 117
10:00 39 12 61 13
10:15 28 9 61 6
10:30 41 2 40 7
10:45 24 4 132 27 49 5 211 31 343 58
11:00 37 3 40 3
11:15 52 6 36 5
11:30 59 2 49 3
11:45 76 1 224 12 48 3 173 14 397 26
Total 987 2182 1484 2036 2471 4218
Percent 31.1% 68.9% 42.2% 57.8% 36.9% 63.1%
Grand
Total 987 2182 1484 2036 2471 4218
Percent 31.1% 68.9% 42.2% 57.8% 36.9% 63.1%
ADT ADT 6,689 AADT 6,689

Page 1 ends

Sunnyside Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & North City Limit

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 20 0 12
12:15 0 13 0 11
12:30 1 21 0 8
12:45 0 7 1 61 0 11 0 42 1 103
01:00 0 15 0 6
01:15 1 6 0 6
01:30 1 11 0 4
01:45 0 11 2 43 0 8 0 24 2 67
02:00 0 11 0 9
02:15 0 27 0 10
02:30 0 5 0 21
02:45 0 22 0 65 0 4 0 44 0 109
03:00 0 20 0 9
03:15 0 13 1 17
03:30 1 13 1 4
03:45 0 9 1 55 0 5 2 35 3 90
04:00 0 10 0 6
04:15 0 6 0 9
04:30 0 5 0 4
04:45 1 8 1 29 1 5 1 24 2 53
05:00 0 12 0 2
05:15 0 16 0 0
05:30 0 11 1 4
05:45 2 8 2 47 2 1 3 7 5 54
06:00 1 6 0 2
06:15 2 13 0 1
06:30 2 3 0 7
06:45 1 5 6 27 5 4 5 14 11 41
07:00 1 3 3 1
07:15 4 6 2 1
07:30 19 3 8 3
07:45 32 2 56 14 13 1 26 6 82 20
08:00 17 0 16 5
08:15 10 6 7 4
08:30 11 5 9 2
08:45 10 3 48 14 6 3 38 14 86 28
09:00 5 9 6 3
09:15 3 1 6 1
09:30 4 5 3 1
09:45 3 0 15 15 6 2 21 7 36 22
10:00 4 1 6 0
10:15 8 2 7 1
10:30 5 2 4 1
10:45 5 2 22 7 2 0 19 2 41 9
11:00 7 1 2 1
11:15 9 1 5 0
11:30 10 0 9 0
11:45 25 1 51 3 23 0 39 1 90 4
Total 205 380 154 220 359 600
Percent 35.0% 65.0% 41.2% 58.8% 37.4% 62.6%
Grand
Total 205 380 154 220 359 600
Percent 35.0% 65.0% 41.2% 58.8% 37.4% 62.6%
ADT ADT 959 AADT 959

Page 1 ends

Sunnyside Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Orange Grove Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 8 1 14
12:15 0 5 0 15
12:30 1 5 0 7
12:45 0 5 3 23 0 8 1 44 4 67
01:00 0 11 0 10
01:15 1 12 0 7
01:30 0 10 0 12
01:45 0 11 1 44 0 6 0 35 1 79
02:00 0 7 0 9
02:15 0 19 0 12
02:30 0 13 0 10
02:45 0 12 0 51 0 23 0 54 0 105
03:00 0 11 0 35
03:15 0 8 0 15
03:30 0 7 0 10
03:45 0 12 0 38 0 13 0 73 0 111
04:00 0 8 0 18
04:15 0 11 0 12
04:30 0 5 1 10
04:45 0 11 0 35 2 12 3 52 3 87
05:00 0 10 0 7
05:15 0 15 0 9
05:30 0 4 1 10
05:45 0 14 0 43 1 10 2 36 2 79
06:00 2 12 0 12
06:15 2 9 2 8
06:30 2 3 5 8
06:45 1 7 7 31 3 2 10 30 17 61
07:00 4 8 5 9
07:15 7 4 8 6
07:30 9 9 19 3
07:45 14 3 34 24 33 6 65 24 99 48
08:00 12 9 40 7
08:15 7 6 16 3
08:30 8 2 18 1
08:45 9 4 36 21 15 1 89 12 125 33
09:00 7 5 6 2
09:15 5 7 9 2
09:30 14 7 7 4
09:45 4 3 30 22 5 1 27 9 57 31
10:00 5 1 6 3
10:15 9 2 11 3
10:30 8 0 3 1
10:45 3 1 25 4 11 0 31 7 56 11
11:00 5 3 4 0
11:15 8 0 4 1
11:30 7 0 12 3
11:45 7 0 27 3 7 2 27 6 54 9
Total 163 339 255 382 418 721
Percent 32.5% 67.5% 40.0% 60.0% 36.7% 63.3%
Grand
Total 163 339 255 382 418 721
Percent 32.5% 67.5% 40.0% 60.0% 36.7% 63.3%
ADT ADT 1,139 AADT 1,139

Page 1 ends

Woodland Drive Btwn
Sturtevant Drive & North City Limit

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/15/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 8 0 4
12:15 0 8 0 6
12:30 0 3 0 4
12:45 2 6 2 25 0 4 0 18 2 43
01:00 1 5 0 8
01:15 0 7 0 7
01:30 0 10 0 5
01:45 0 4 1 26 0 6 0 26 1 52
02:00 0 5 0 4
02:15 0 7 0 8
02:30 0 7 0 5
02:45 0 8 0 27 0 10 0 27 0 54
03:00 0 6 1 9
03:15 0 5 0 10
03:30 0 9 0 3
03:45 0 8 0 28 0 9 1 31 1 59
04:00 0 3 0 8
04:15 0 4 1 7
04:30 0 7 1 5
04:45 0 11 0 25 1 1 3 21 3 46
05:00 0 12 0 7
05:15 0 9 2 5
05:30 1 8 4 6
05:45 1 7 2 36 3 5 9 23 11 59
06:00 0 10 4 5
06:15 1 12 2 3
06:30 1 7 4 5
06:45 1 9 3 38 8 6 18 19 21 57
07:00 2 6 10 2
07:15 2 10 10 5
07:30 3 8 13 4
07:45 4 4 11 28 13 1 46 12 57 40
08:00 2 5 10 3
08:15 3 4 4 1
08:30 4 5 11 0
08:45 1 3 10 17 8 1 33 5 43 22
09:00 4 6 10 2
09:15 2 5 7 0
09:30 4 4 4 0
09:45 8 2 18 17 9 0 30 2 48 19
10:00 6 3 8 5
10:15 8 3 6 4
10:30 2 0 5 2
10:45 6 0 22 6 5 0 24 11 46 17
11:00 3 1 9 0
11:15 1 0 4 0
11:30 5 0 4 0
11:45 3 2 12 3 5 1 22 1 34 4
Total 81 276 186 196 267 472
Percent 22.7% 77.3% 48.7% 51.3% 36.1% 63.9%
Grand
Total 81 276 186 196 267 472
Percent 22.7% 77.3% 48.7% 51.3% 36.1% 63.9%
ADT ADT 739 AADT 739

Page 1 ends

Baldwin Avenue Btwn
Highland Avenue & Carter Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 14 3 13
12:15 3 9 2 13
12:30 2 12 4 10
12:45 1 21 6 56 0 15 9 51 15 107
01:00 1 13 1 12
01:15 0 12 1 18
01:30 3 16 1 19
01:45 3 16 7 57 1 12 4 61 11 118
02:00 1 15 2 15
02:15 0 13 0 18
02:30 2 9 1 17
02:45 0 22 3 59 0 16 3 66 6 125
03:00 0 19 0 21
03:15 0 13 1 9
03:30 0 9 0 10
03:45 0 15 0 56 0 6 1 46 1 102
04:00 0 15 1 11
04:15 0 15 1 7
04:30 0 21 0 19
04:45 0 19 0 70 1 10 3 47 3 117
05:00 0 7 0 9
05:15 1 12 2 10
05:30 0 14 3 11
05:45 2 12 3 45 1 12 6 42 9 87
06:00 2 24 2 8
06:15 4 8 6 12
06:30 6 10 4 8
06:45 1 21 13 63 3 12 15 40 28 103
07:00 4 14 5 11
07:15 5 9 3 11
07:30 9 14 7 9
07:45 7 21 25 58 12 9 27 40 52 98
08:00 10 16 10 7
08:15 3 14 12 8
08:30 9 13 12 11
08:45 7 9 29 52 8 6 42 32 71 84
09:00 9 7 15 8
09:15 22 13 8 2
09:30 8 6 9 2
09:45 15 13 54 39 17 5 49 17 103 56
10:00 10 12 14 1
10:15 11 9 9 4
10:30 15 3 17 3
10:45 11 4 47 28 14 1 54 9 101 37
11:00 9 5 12 8
11:15 10 8 15 3
11:30 9 7 10 7
11:45 18 7 46 27 15 5 52 23 98 50
Total 233 610 265 474 498 1084
Percent 27.6% 72.4% 35.9% 64.1% 31.5% 68.5%
Grand
Total 233 610 265 474 498 1084
Percent 27.6% 72.4% 35.9% 64.1% 31.5% 68.5%
ADT ADT 1,582 AADT 1,582

Page 1 ends

Baldwin Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Boulevard & Highland Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 52 5 50
12:15 5 42 4 41
12:30 10 46 2 57
12:45 3 58 22 198 0 55 11 203 33 401
01:00 4 59 3 55
01:15 1 51 1 61
01:30 6 53 1 47
01:45 3 49 14 212 2 46 7 209 21 421
02:00 2 44 2 39
02:15 0 45 0 48
02:30 2 56 1 41
02:45 1 52 5 197 1 45 4 173 9 370
03:00 2 60 2 52
03:15 1 49 2 33
03:30 0 39 0 42
03:45 0 42 3 190 1 23 5 150 8 340
04:00 3 52 3 45
04:15 2 48 6 41
04:30 2 55 5 43
04:45 2 55 9 210 1 34 15 163 24 373
05:00 2 43 1 45
05:15 2 48 3 28
05:30 4 41 6 39
05:45 6 25 14 157 8 32 18 144 32 301
06:00 6 46 6 47
06:15 7 40 13 45
06:30 12 43 9 32
06:45 16 34 41 163 13 36 41 160 82 323
07:00 26 50 10 33
07:15 19 27 20 28
07:30 24 25 19 25
07:45 40 37 109 139 28 24 77 110 186 249
08:00 22 24 32 23
08:15 30 35 37 22
08:30 30 28 33 16
08:45 54 22 136 109 40 13 142 74 278 183
09:00 33 24 37 23
09:15 50 16 38 12
09:30 43 15 38 11
09:45 38 26 164 81 53 15 166 61 330 142
10:00 52 29 43 15
10:15 62 20 33 12
10:30 50 13 57 4
10:45 41 15 205 77 40 6 173 37 378 114
11:00 47 6 44 12
11:15 60 11 51 2
11:30 47 16 65 10
11:45 51 12 205 45 47 7 207 31 412 76
Total 927 1778 866 1515 1793 3293
Percent 34.3% 65.7% 36.4% 63.6% 35.3% 64.7%
Grand
Total 927 1778 866 1515 1793 3293
Percent 34.3% 65.7% 36.4% 63.6% 35.3% 64.7%
ADT ADT 5,086 AADT 5,086

Page 1 ends

Grand View Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Michillinda Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 18 3 36
12:15 3 25 1 27
12:30 4 27 2 30
12:45 2 35 11 105 0 26 6 119 17 224
01:00 1 23 0 30
01:15 0 18 1 29
01:30 1 23 1 21
01:45 1 23 3 87 1 25 3 105 6 192
02:00 0 35 0 20
02:15 3 34 0 29
02:30 0 30 1 27
02:45 0 31 3 130 0 27 1 103 4 233
03:00 0 25 0 21
03:15 0 32 0 24
03:30 0 35 0 22
03:45 0 29 0 121 0 12 0 79 0 200
04:00 0 29 1 21
04:15 1 19 0 16
04:30 0 29 0 30
04:45 1 30 2 107 0 28 1 95 3 202
05:00 1 31 1 22
05:15 0 25 1 27
05:30 2 29 3 33
05:45 1 29 4 114 1 25 6 107 10 221
06:00 2 23 1 32
06:15 4 15 3 21
06:30 2 14 5 13
06:45 2 12 10 64 3 12 12 78 22 142
07:00 5 13 7 6
07:15 5 11 11 10
07:30 6 14 11 14
07:45 8 12 24 50 12 8 41 38 65 88
08:00 10 13 12 7
08:15 10 12 15 5
08:30 10 7 22 10
08:45 11 5 41 37 18 10 67 32 108 69
09:00 14 5 21 8
09:15 16 7 23 3
09:30 16 6 17 8
09:45 25 7 71 25 16 7 77 26 148 51
10:00 15 8 28 4
10:15 21 5 19 9
10:30 14 5 19 3
10:45 18 3 68 21 18 5 84 21 152 42
11:00 26 1 20 1
11:15 23 1 23 5
11:30 19 0 19 2
11:45 35 4 103 6 29 3 91 11 194 17
Total 340 867 389 814 729 1681
Percent 28.2% 71.8% 32.3% 67.7% 30.2% 69.8%
Grand
Total 340 867 389 814 729 1681
Percent 28.2% 71.8% 32.3% 67.7% 30.2% 69.8%
ADT ADT 2,410 AADT 2,410

Page 1 ends

Grand View Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Santa Anita Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 25 3 31
12:15 5 25 3 25
12:30 2 28 0 25
12:45 3 26 14 104 0 31 6 112 20 216
01:00 1 31 1 23
01:15 1 20 0 19
01:30 2 27 3 23
01:45 1 18 5 96 1 27 5 92 10 188
02:00 0 28 0 22
02:15 3 26 0 30
02:30 0 26 4 26
02:45 2 13 5 93 0 25 4 103 9 196
03:00 0 21 1 24
03:15 2 20 0 18
03:30 1 34 0 24
03:45 1 24 4 99 1 24 2 90 6 189
04:00 0 33 0 20
04:15 0 25 1 26
04:30 0 17 1 26
04:45 1 23 1 98 0 35 2 107 3 205
05:00 2 31 1 22
05:15 2 22 2 17
05:30 2 26 2 18
05:45 2 25 8 104 0 26 5 83 13 187
06:00 4 27 1 19
06:15 5 28 4 18
06:30 5 17 3 18
06:45 6 14 20 86 6 13 14 68 34 154
07:00 6 23 9 19
07:15 11 8 10 8
07:30 5 9 6 13
07:45 12 15 34 55 14 14 39 54 73 109
08:00 9 4 8 9
08:15 12 7 17 16
08:30 19 17 17 15
08:45 10 7 50 35 17 10 59 50 109 85
09:00 16 6 12 8
09:15 17 9 18 9
09:30 20 3 19 8
09:45 18 6 71 24 21 9 70 34 141 58
10:00 17 8 22 15
10:15 20 2 26 2
10:30 19 4 19 6
10:45 24 3 80 17 31 14 98 37 178 54
11:00 19 6 9 4
11:15 25 5 16 4
11:30 24 1 19 5
11:45 19 3 87 15 17 3 61 16 148 31
Total 379 826 365 846 744 1672
Percent 31.5% 68.5% 30.1% 69.9% 30.8% 69.2%
Grand
Total 379 826 365 846 744 1672
Percent 31.5% 68.5% 30.1% 69.9% 30.8% 69.2%
ADT ADT 2,416 AADT 2,416

Page 1 ends

Baldwin Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Orange Grove Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 8 65 12 87
12:15 11 57 8 88
12:30 12 66 7 74
12:45 8 83 39 271 7 104 34 353 73 624
01:00 8 50 6 110
01:15 1 63 2 86
01:30 8 78 5 97
01:45 4 68 21 259 8 77 21 370 42 629
02:00 4 65 7 89
02:15 5 66 2 91
02:30 2 74 2 83
02:45 1 60 12 265 0 85 11 348 23 613
03:00 7 86 4 96
03:15 3 55 10 68
03:30 0 64 2 73
03:45 2 67 12 272 1 60 17 297 29 569
04:00 2 65 2 69
04:15 3 52 6 80
04:30 3 62 5 74
04:45 1 67 9 246 3 63 16 286 25 532
05:00 3 51 5 78
05:15 5 59 6 53
05:30 9 37 18 59
05:45 19 58 36 205 14 78 43 268 79 473
06:00 7 42 14 74
06:15 11 60 20 76
06:30 16 49 20 69
06:45 32 47 66 198 31 56 85 275 151 473
07:00 32 42 24 74
07:15 27 52 35 58
07:30 39 48 34 40
07:45 42 46 140 188 39 44 132 216 272 404
08:00 47 41 45 44
08:15 50 48 44 56
08:30 67 48 57 30
08:45 87 27 251 164 61 36 207 166 458 330
09:00 63 34 76 46
09:15 92 26 72 32
09:30 78 26 81 30
09:45 74 35 307 121 87 30 316 138 623 259
10:00 62 35 68 35
10:15 85 31 82 28
10:30 91 23 84 16
10:45 65 27 303 116 89 25 323 104 626 220
11:00 81 9 87 24
11:15 82 23 100 20
11:30 64 18 98 16
11:45 77 30 304 80 91 16 376 76 680 156
Total 1500 2385 1581 2897 3081 5282
Percent 38.6% 61.4% 35.3% 64.7% 36.8% 63.2%
Grand
Total 1500 2385 1581 2897 3081 5282
Percent 38.6% 61.4% 35.3% 64.7% 36.8% 63.2%
ADT ADT 8,363 AADT 8,363

Page 1 ends

Highland Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Michillinda Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 9 0 12
12:15 18 14 0 17
12:30 5 8 0 14
12:45 0 9 23 40 2 11 2 54 25 94
01:00 0 9 0 10
01:15 0 10 0 13
01:30 0 10 0 8
01:45 1 14 1 43 0 9 0 40 1 83
02:00 0 11 1 15
02:15 1 9 0 7
02:30 0 10 0 12
02:45 1 9 2 39 0 9 1 43 3 82
03:00 0 10 0 4
03:15 3 8 2 8
03:30 0 5 0 9
03:45 0 9 3 32 0 6 2 27 5 59
04:00 1 11 0 9
04:15 2 6 0 11
04:30 2 7 0 9
04:45 2 9 7 33 0 7 0 36 7 69
05:00 4 7 0 9
05:15 0 8 0 11
05:30 0 9 0 9
05:45 2 9 6 33 0 4 0 33 6 66
06:00 1 12 0 8
06:15 0 8 0 10
06:30 3 5 2 11
06:45 2 9 6 34 4 10 6 39 12 73
07:00 3 10 1 8
07:15 2 10 0 5
07:30 0 7 4 12
07:45 1 9 6 36 2 5 7 30 13 66
08:00 0 8 5 9
08:15 2 5 6 5
08:30 5 3 8 5
08:45 6 4 13 20 3 3 22 22 35 42
09:00 7 8 6 4
09:15 9 4 6 1
09:30 9 7 9 6
09:45 11 3 36 22 10 3 31 14 67 36
10:00 11 2 12 2
10:15 4 4 10 3
10:30 7 3 13 2
10:45 4 3 26 12 6 3 41 10 67 22
11:00 12 4 13 2
11:15 10 0 13 6
11:30 13 2 19 1
11:45 13 1 48 7 14 1 59 10 107 17
Total 177 351 171 358 348 709
Percent 33.5% 66.5% 32.3% 67.7% 32.9% 67.1%
Grand
Total 177 351 171 358 348 709
Percent 33.5% 66.5% 32.3% 67.7% 32.9% 67.1%
ADT ADT 1,561 AADT 1,561

Page 1 ends

Highland Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Canon Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 3 0 3
12:15 1 2 0 2
12:30 1 6 0 3
12:45 0 2 2 13 0 2 0 10 2 23
01:00 0 3 0 4
01:15 0 4 0 0
01:30 0 4 0 4
01:45 0 4 0 15 0 1 0 9 0 24
02:00 1 3 1 3
02:15 1 5 0 2
02:30 0 3 0 1
02:45 0 4 2 15 0 2 1 8 3 23
03:00 0 5 0 4
03:15 1 0 0 0
03:30 1 2 0 3
03:45 0 7 2 14 0 1 0 8 2 22
04:00 0 3 0 1
04:15 0 6 1 3
04:30 0 0 0 0
04:45 0 5 0 14 0 2 1 6 1 20
05:00 0 3 0 1
05:15 1 4 0 1
05:30 0 2 0 3
05:45 0 3 1 12 0 3 0 8 1 20
06:00 1 2 1 3
06:15 0 3 0 0
06:30 0 1 0 2
06:45 0 0 1 6 2 0 3 5 4 11
07:00 0 2 0 1
07:15 0 3 1 0
07:30 1 1 2 0
07:45 2 1 3 7 1 0 4 1 7 8
08:00 0 0 0 0
08:15 2 2 0 2
08:30 0 2 0 0
08:45 4 4 6 8 1 3 1 5 7 13
09:00 0 0 0 1
09:15 6 2 5 1
09:30 3 1 3 0
09:45 1 0 10 3 0 0 8 2 18 5
10:00 2 0 4 0
10:15 2 0 0 0
10:30 3 0 1 0
10:45 3 2 10 2 2 0 7 0 17 2
11:00 2 0 0 0
11:15 2 0 2 0
11:30 3 1 4 0
11:45 1 0 8 1 3 0 9 0 17 1
Total 45 110 34 62 79 172
Percent 29.0% 71.0% 35.4% 64.6% 31.5% 68.5%
Grand
Total 45 110 34 62 79 172
Percent 29.0% 71.0% 35.4% 64.6% 31.5% 68.5%
ADT ADT 251 AADT 251

Page 1 ends

Lima Street Btwn
Sierra Madre Boulevard & Carter Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 19 2 11
12:15 1 20 0 19
12:30 1 23 0 14
12:45 0 13 2 75 0 8 2 52 4 127
01:00 2 20 2 9
01:15 0 12 0 11
01:30 0 24 0 10
01:45 0 22 2 78 0 10 2 40 4 118
02:00 1 13 0 6
02:15 0 20 0 9
02:30 0 13 1 17
02:45 0 18 1 64 0 11 1 43 2 107
03:00 0 14 0 14
03:15 0 13 1 7
03:30 0 12 0 3
03:45 0 10 0 49 0 13 1 37 1 86
04:00 1 9 0 20
04:15 0 11 0 16
04:30 0 10 1 8
04:45 0 14 1 44 1 13 2 57 3 101
05:00 0 9 0 7
05:15 1 7 1 8
05:30 0 11 1 8
05:45 0 7 1 34 1 5 3 28 4 62
06:00 0 7 1 12
06:15 2 11 4 6
06:30 1 7 4 4
06:45 6 8 9 33 0 4 9 26 18 59
07:00 2 13 2 5
07:15 3 5 4 4
07:30 3 1 3 4
07:45 5 9 13 28 6 7 15 20 28 48
08:00 6 4 5 2
08:15 3 7 4 5
08:30 4 3 12 3
08:45 5 10 18 24 8 3 29 13 47 37
09:00 6 4 10 2
09:15 12 3 11 0
09:30 3 1 8 5
09:45 11 2 32 10 8 2 37 9 69 19
10:00 14 2 9 3
10:15 12 1 10 2
10:30 9 2 6 0
10:45 11 6 46 11 6 0 31 5 77 16
11:00 11 6 10 2
11:15 10 2 9 0
11:30 11 0 10 1
11:45 18 0 50 8 4 1 33 4 83 12
Total 175 458 165 334 340 792
Percent 27.6% 72.4% 33.1% 66.9% 30.0% 70.0%
Grand
Total 175 458 165 334 340 792
Percent 27.6% 72.4% 33.1% 66.9% 30.0% 70.0%
ADT ADT 1,132 AADT 1,132

Page 1 ends

Lima Street Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Orange Grove Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 20 2 22
12:15 1 30 2 24
12:30 3 25 1 26
12:45 0 20 6 95 1 15 6 87 12 182
01:00 1 29 1 16
01:15 1 22 2 18
01:30 2 25 1 37
01:45 1 20 5 96 0 18 4 89 9 185
02:00 0 19 0 18
02:15 0 26 1 23
02:30 3 16 0 12
02:45 0 18 3 79 0 25 1 78 4 157
03:00 1 13 1 16
03:15 0 14 1 16
03:30 3 16 0 14
03:45 1 16 5 59 1 15 3 61 8 120
04:00 1 9 1 21
04:15 0 14 0 10
04:30 2 18 0 17
04:45 0 14 3 55 0 15 1 63 4 118
05:00 0 14 1 16
05:15 2 20 2 9
05:30 3 13 2 20
05:45 3 14 8 61 1 13 6 58 14 119
06:00 0 14 1 14
06:15 3 15 6 10
06:30 4 16 5 13
06:45 9 15 16 60 1 12 13 49 29 109
07:00 9 11 4 15
07:15 7 6 8 8
07:30 6 10 8 7
07:45 7 9 29 36 6 11 26 41 55 77
08:00 12 6 10 6
08:15 11 15 17 5
08:30 15 13 12 6
08:45 17 10 55 44 19 8 58 25 113 69
09:00 23 13 12 8
09:15 25 5 24 4
09:30 13 5 9 8
09:45 22 6 83 29 18 4 63 24 146 53
10:00 29 2 20 2
10:15 24 4 26 4
10:30 8 5 20 2
10:45 13 11 74 22 12 3 78 11 152 33
11:00 22 5 21 2
11:15 21 3 11 2
11:30 19 2 25 0
11:45 19 3 81 13 23 1 80 5 161 18
Total 368 649 339 591 707 1240
Percent 36.2% 63.8% 36.5% 63.5% 36.3% 63.7%
Grand
Total 368 649 339 591 707 1240
Percent 36.2% 63.8% 36.5% 63.5% 36.3% 63.7%
ADT ADT 1,947 AADT 1,947

Page 1 ends

Michillinda Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & North City Limit

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 6 26 7 51
12:15 3 26 0 53
12:30 2 26 1 46
12:45 2 21 13 99 2 40 10 190 23 289
01:00 3 36 3 47
01:15 1 33 4 33
01:30 5 15 4 40
01:45 2 33 11 117 2 51 13 171 24 288
02:00 3 25 3 38
02:15 2 35 1 43
02:30 1 30 1 25
02:45 1 38 7 128 1 42 6 148 13 276
03:00 0 35 1 45
03:15 0 42 4 45
03:30 1 20 1 46
03:45 1 29 2 126 1 44 7 180 9 306
04:00 0 36 0 41
04:15 0 38 0 44
04:30 2 35 3 52
04:45 1 45 3 154 0 45 3 182 6 336
05:00 2 28 2 58
05:15 0 34 2 45
05:30 1 35 4 51
05:45 4 28 7 125 5 47 13 201 20 326
06:00 1 21 7 43
06:15 11 28 4 37
06:30 2 17 7 35
06:45 8 18 22 84 10 44 28 159 50 243
07:00 4 17 11 32
07:15 9 18 16 33
07:30 10 22 16 27
07:45 21 18 44 75 18 30 61 122 105 197
08:00 15 20 20 27
08:15 17 16 29 38
08:30 10 21 35 22
08:45 25 12 67 69 35 24 119 111 186 180
09:00 19 19 38 28
09:15 13 7 45 25
09:30 30 12 45 19
09:45 25 12 87 50 52 14 180 86 267 136
10:00 28 13 39 15
10:15 17 6 37 10
10:30 27 11 50 16
10:45 24 12 96 42 46 10 172 51 268 93
11:00 36 12 41 7
11:15 24 6 54 8
11:30 28 6 39 2
11:45 30 3 118 27 52 7 186 24 304 51
Total 477 1096 798 1625 1275 2721
Percent 30.3% 69.7% 32.9% 67.1% 31.9% 68.1%
Grand
Total 477 1096 798 1625 1275 2721
Percent 30.3% 69.7% 32.9% 67.1% 31.9% 68.1%
ADT ADT 3,996 AADT 3,996

Page 1 ends

Michillinda Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Orange Grove Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 19 76 5 122
12:15 16 72 5 123
12:30 12 88 8 120
12:45 6 75 53 311 0 139 18 504 71 815
01:00 6 76 4 135
01:15 3 99 0 137
01:30 2 94 4 123
01:45 4 97 15 366 4 118 12 513 27 879
02:00 7 100 2 126
02:15 2 79 5 156
02:30 3 88 3 133
02:45 4 106 16 373 2 144 12 559 28 932
03:00 3 96 2 154
03:15 0 89 0 126
03:30 3 71 4 128
03:45 2 70 8 326 1 147 7 555 15 881
04:00 2 95 1 142
04:15 1 73 5 134
04:30 2 96 2 125
04:45 3 106 8 370 2 129 10 530 18 900
05:00 3 102 12 107
05:15 0 92 6 125
05:30 9 114 17 114
05:45 17 93 29 401 17 124 52 470 81 871
06:00 11 79 13 116
06:15 9 76 21 85
06:30 16 53 29 62
06:45 18 58 54 266 31 70 94 333 148 599
07:00 16 65 45 43
07:15 24 55 51 53
07:30 33 51 57 66
07:45 50 46 123 217 50 54 203 216 326 433
08:00 66 38 72 41
08:15 61 53 73 64
08:30 55 34 78 57
08:45 73 27 255 152 95 60 318 222 573 374
09:00 57 44 97 52
09:15 59 46 103 38
09:30 78 44 119 37
09:45 70 35 264 169 110 37 429 164 693 333
10:00 85 36 88 20
10:15 81 37 93 10
10:30 70 27 111 23
10:45 78 35 314 135 99 30 391 83 705 218
11:00 88 24 124 15
11:15 93 22 114 12
11:30 77 24 92 16
11:45 72 22 330 92 138 0 468 43 798 135
Total 1469 3178 2014 4192 3483 7370
Percent 31.6% 68.4% 32.5% 67.5% 32.1% 67.9%
Grand
Total 1469 3178 2014 4192 3483 7370
Percent 31.6% 68.4% 32.5% 67.5% 32.1% 67.9%
ADT ADT 10,853 AADT 10,853

Page 1 ends

Mountain Trail Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Mira Monte Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 19 1 22
12:15 2 26 1 23
12:30 9 20 1 30
12:45 2 28 13 93 1 30 4 105 17 198
01:00 3 25 0 20
01:15 0 18 0 23
01:30 2 16 2 18
01:45 1 21 6 80 1 26 3 87 9 167
02:00 0 13 0 21
02:15 4 31 0 29
02:30 0 16 0 17
02:45 1 17 5 77 0 22 0 89 5 166
03:00 1 17 0 18
03:15 1 16 0 22
03:30 0 21 0 20
03:45 0 15 2 69 2 15 2 75 4 144
04:00 0 13 0 21
04:15 0 12 2 19
04:30 0 18 1 23
04:45 1 27 1 70 0 25 3 88 4 158
05:00 1 14 4 20
05:15 1 14 2 14
05:30 2 22 1 12
05:45 2 23 6 73 2 25 9 71 15 144
06:00 0 16 2 11
06:15 3 21 3 28
06:30 0 17 8 20
06:45 5 15 8 69 10 18 23 77 31 146
07:00 6 13 7 8
07:15 8 19 12 11
07:30 7 8 10 12
07:45 9 14 30 54 16 9 45 40 75 94
08:00 7 10 12 8
08:15 6 12 12 10
08:30 12 9 18 5
08:45 12 13 37 44 26 2 68 25 105 69
09:00 16 11 21 9
09:15 12 10 22 9
09:30 16 4 26 3
09:45 15 14 59 39 40 9 109 30 168 69
10:00 18 5 27 5
10:15 15 8 27 5
10:30 22 13 27 3
10:45 20 4 75 30 28 10 109 23 184 53
11:00 19 4 33 3
11:15 25 5 21 1
11:30 23 4 21 1
11:45 12 2 79 15 20 0 95 5 174 20
Total 321 713 470 715 791 1428
Percent 31.0% 69.0% 39.7% 60.3% 35.6% 64.4%
Grand
Total 321 713 470 715 791 1428
Percent 31.0% 69.0% 39.7% 60.3% 35.6% 64.4%
ADT ADT 2,219 AADT 2,219

Page 1 ends

Mountain Trail Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Orange Grove Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 30 1 31
12:15 4 38 2 48
12:30 7 30 3 30
12:45 2 39 15 137 2 42 8 151 23 288
01:00 4 35 0 35
01:15 2 30 0 41
01:30 3 27 4 34
01:45 2 33 11 125 0 36 4 146 15 271
02:00 0 26 0 34
02:15 5 36 0 42
02:30 2 25 1 27
02:45 1 40 8 127 1 36 2 139 10 266
03:00 1 30 0 41
03:15 1 17 0 29
03:30 1 32 0 36
03:45 0 27 3 106 1 22 1 128 4 234
04:00 0 27 0 27
04:15 1 19 2 27
04:30 0 23 2 37
04:45 1 33 2 102 1 31 5 122 7 224
05:00 1 26 5 34
05:15 2 24 3 30
05:30 4 26 5 20
05:45 3 30 10 106 4 39 17 123 27 229
06:00 3 27 2 26
06:15 3 26 3 36
06:30 0 19 10 31
06:45 12 24 18 96 11 22 26 115 44 211
07:00 11 18 13 17
07:15 8 22 14 22
07:30 15 11 20 15
07:45 19 23 53 74 25 14 72 68 125 142
08:00 12 13 28 11
08:15 16 18 19 19
08:30 18 16 35 9
08:45 21 19 67 66 35 8 117 47 184 113
09:00 17 15 43 14
09:15 20 17 37 13
09:30 22 10 36 6
09:45 20 15 79 57 55 10 171 43 250 100
10:00 25 7 37 8
10:15 23 13 38 6
10:30 29 17 38 4
10:45 35 5 112 42 39 10 152 28 264 70
11:00 26 8 44 4
11:15 36 10 34 3
11:30 28 5 41 3
11:45 21 5 111 28 25 0 144 10 255 38
Total 489 1066 719 1120 1208 2186
Percent 31.4% 68.6% 39.1% 60.9% 35.6% 64.4%
Grand
Total 489 1066 719 1120 1208 2186
Percent 31.4% 68.6% 39.1% 60.9% 35.6% 64.4%
ADT ADT 3,394 AADT 3,394

Page 1 ends

Orange Grove Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Michillinda Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 1 57 2 64
12:15 5 52 8 49
12:30 6 58 1 68
12:45 2 69 14 236 1 58 12 239 26 475
01:00 4 63 6 83
01:15 3 70 1 68
01:30 0 65 2 78
01:45 1 64 8 262 0 56 9 285 17 547
02:00 2 54 0 72
02:15 2 63 2 75
02:30 2 64 1 58
02:45 0 81 6 262 0 58 3 263 9 525
03:00 3 58 1 54
03:15 0 64 0 58
03:30 1 66 0 69
03:45 0 81 4 269 0 59 1 240 5 509
04:00 0 74 0 74
04:15 0 83 0 72
04:30 1 54 1 65
04:45 4 64 5 275 1 84 2 295 7 570
05:00 1 67 1 84
05:15 2 61 2 51
05:30 3 56 3 48
05:45 4 40 10 224 4 44 10 227 20 451
06:00 2 40 2 53
06:15 4 43 8 41
06:30 3 43 5 42
06:45 7 36 16 162 5 33 20 169 36 331
07:00 11 25 9 46
07:15 15 28 18 25
07:30 12 20 17 27
07:45 16 23 54 96 16 17 60 115 114 211
08:00 22 15 32 17
08:15 19 25 33 21
08:30 32 20 35 16
08:45 27 16 100 76 27 12 127 66 227 142
09:00 33 19 36 15
09:15 39 19 44 13
09:30 26 10 45 16
09:45 44 17 142 65 37 12 162 56 304 121
10:00 42 9 43 12
10:15 36 7 45 12
10:30 43 11 51 11
10:45 46 10 167 37 47 6 186 41 353 78
11:00 48 3 67 4
11:15 44 7 58 3
11:30 48 4 59 4
11:45 54 7 194 21 64 5 248 16 442 37
Total 720 1985 840 2012 1560 3997
Percent 26.6% 73.4% 29.5% 70.5% 28.1% 71.9%
Grand
Total 720 1985 840 2012 1560 3997
Percent 26.6% 73.4% 29.5% 70.5% 28.1% 71.9%
ADT ADT 5,557 AADT 5,557

Page 1 ends

Orange Grove Avenue Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & East City Limit

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 3 46 1 30
12:15 1 39 4 30
12:30 3 40 2 35
12:45 2 32 9 157 3 26 10 121 19 278
01:00 1 35 5 34
01:15 1 41 2 27
01:30 0 30 0 32
01:45 2 50 4 156 2 42 9 135 13 291
02:00 1 52 0 35
02:15 2 55 0 28
02:30 1 53 0 35
02:45 1 67 5 227 0 30 0 128 5 355
03:00 1 49 1 31
03:15 1 53 0 28
03:30 0 53 0 33
03:45 0 52 2 207 0 34 1 126 3 333
04:00 0 49 0 23
04:15 0 66 0 26
04:30 0 50 0 36
04:45 3 53 3 218 0 46 0 131 3 349
05:00 2 48 2 45
05:15 2 56 2 37
05:30 4 45 1 33
05:45 1 53 9 202 5 35 10 150 19 352
06:00 4 25 0 30
06:15 3 24 3 16
06:30 8 23 7 21
06:45 6 13 21 85 12 9 22 76 43 161
07:00 6 17 4 10
07:15 13 12 10 16
07:30 17 9 11 18
07:45 17 11 53 49 11 14 36 58 89 107
08:00 15 8 20 9
08:15 16 12 18 6
08:30 19 5 22 6
08:45 24 6 74 31 20 7 80 28 154 59
09:00 27 8 22 8
09:15 29 7 20 13
09:30 18 6 23 8
09:45 37 7 111 28 28 5 93 34 204 62
10:00 26 4 25 4
10:15 27 5 19 4
10:30 31 6 23 3
10:45 23 1 107 16 20 2 87 13 194 29
11:00 34 7 35 3
11:15 36 4 40 7
11:30 35 3 26 2
11:45 41 7 146 21 35 6 136 18 282 39
Total 544 1397 484 1018 1028 2415
Percent 28.0% 72.0% 32.2% 67.8% 29.9% 70.1%
Grand
Total 544 1397 484 1018 1028 2415
Percent 28.0% 72.0% 32.2% 67.8% 29.9% 70.1%
ADT ADT 3,443 AADT 3,443

Page 1 ends

Santa Anita Avenue Btwn
Grand View Avenue & Arno Drive

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 14 0 20
12:15 0 28 2 27
12:30 0 18 3 20
12:45 0 10 0 70 2 28 7 95 7 165
01:00 0 14 0 22
01:15 0 19 1 20
01:30 0 11 0 30
01:45 4 12 4 56 1 23 2 95 6 151
02:00 0 15 0 25
02:15 3 14 0 28
02:30 0 13 0 22
02:45 0 13 3 55 0 29 0 104 3 159
03:00 0 10 0 19
03:15 0 15 0 19
03:30 0 14 0 22
03:45 0 13 0 52 0 21 0 81 0 133
04:00 0 9 0 29
04:15 0 18 2 24
04:30 0 12 3 23
04:45 3 10 3 49 1 25 6 101 9 150
05:00 9 13 0 18
05:15 7 6 5 21
05:30 13 9 8 14
05:45 30 12 59 40 6 15 19 68 78 108
06:00 20 11 7 12
06:15 20 8 7 24
06:30 22 11 6 20
06:45 28 6 90 36 8 19 28 75 118 111
07:00 27 5 6 16
07:15 24 9 7 9
07:30 31 10 12 6
07:45 27 6 109 30 13 4 38 35 147 65
08:00 14 5 9 6
08:15 21 0 9 8
08:30 11 5 8 2
08:45 20 1 66 11 9 5 35 21 101 32
09:00 11 4 14 3
09:15 9 3 14 2
09:30 12 1 16 1
09:45 18 2 50 10 10 0 54 6 104 16
10:00 24 2 13 1
10:15 18 3 20 2
10:30 28 3 18 2
10:45 18 0 88 8 19 1 70 6 158 14
11:00 7 0 20 1
11:15 20 2 20 1
11:30 17 0 22 0
11:45 19 1 63 3 13 0 75 2 138 5
Total 535 420 334 689 869 1109
Percent 56.0% 44.0% 32.6% 67.4% 43.9% 56.1%
Grand
Total 535 420 334 689 869 1109
Percent 56.0% 44.0% 32.6% 67.4% 43.9% 56.1%
ADT ADT 1,978 AADT 1,978

Page 1 ends

Sierra Madre Boulevard Btwn
Lima Street & Michillinda Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 12 76 3 69
12:15 5 99 4 46
12:30 7 67 5 75
12:45 6 89 30 331 2 59 14 249 44 580
01:00 3 87 2 58
01:15 2 85 2 56
01:30 1 78 1 54
01:45 3 91 9 341 2 50 7 218 16 559
02:00 1 83 2 53
02:15 1 72 0 51
02:30 1 77 1 70
02:45 1 100 4 332 2 53 5 227 9 559
03:00 4 81 0 44
03:15 1 82 0 57
03:30 1 77 2 55
03:45 1 74 7 314 1 47 3 203 10 517
04:00 1 75 0 49
04:15 2 81 0 63
04:30 1 65 2 54
04:45 1 69 5 290 3 61 5 227 10 517
05:00 4 75 1 57
05:15 1 56 3 49
05:30 5 75 4 41
05:45 6 63 16 269 4 52 12 199 28 468
06:00 11 54 5 34
06:15 10 76 5 31
06:30 9 35 7 45
06:45 19 66 49 231 11 26 28 136 77 367
07:00 11 47 10 34
07:15 15 44 16 28
07:30 25 42 20 27
07:45 38 25 89 158 28 17 74 106 163 264
08:00 37 33 25 26
08:15 39 38 28 18
08:30 38 24 34 32
08:45 56 32 170 127 49 30 136 106 306 233
09:00 39 25 36 27
09:15 49 25 46 20
09:30 60 25 52 10
09:45 69 21 217 96 35 15 169 72 386 168
10:00 81 11 49 18
10:15 52 15 50 11
10:30 66 13 50 11
10:45 78 11 277 50 49 9 198 49 475 99
11:00 89 6 37 15
11:15 84 10 67 11
11:30 74 12 48 11
11:45 97 10 344 38 53 12 205 49 549 87
Total 1217 2577 856 1841 2073 4418
Percent 32.1% 67.9% 31.7% 68.3% 31.9% 68.1%
Grand
Total 1217 2577 856 1841 2073 4418
Percent 32.1% 67.9% 31.7% 68.3% 31.9% 68.1%
ADT ADT 6,491 AADT 6,491

Page 1 ends

Sierra Madre Boulevard Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & Lima Street

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 9 75 1 78
12:15 4 97 6 63
12:30 5 83 2 61
12:45 5 108 23 363 0 66 9 268 32 631
01:00 1 86 3 62
01:15 1 90 0 55
01:30 2 76 3 57
01:45 5 97 9 349 0 55 6 229 15 578
02:00 0 81 3 70
02:15 1 68 0 49
02:30 3 82 0 63
02:45 1 84 5 315 2 63 5 245 10 560
03:00 3 82 0 62
03:15 0 78 3 48
03:30 1 79 0 53
03:45 1 72 5 311 0 46 3 209 8 520
04:00 0 73 0 34
04:15 1 76 0 49
04:30 0 68 2 52
04:45 0 66 1 283 1 72 3 207 4 490
05:00 4 69 2 53
05:15 1 60 6 47
05:30 1 58 10 45
05:45 6 53 12 240 8 57 26 202 38 442
06:00 8 41 8 41
06:15 8 60 8 40
06:30 10 52 7 40
06:45 17 48 43 201 13 41 36 162 79 363
07:00 17 52 20 41
07:15 15 45 18 31
07:30 18 46 26 27
07:45 38 29 88 172 31 23 95 122 183 294
08:00 27 32 36 26
08:15 30 37 35 25
08:30 35 31 37 31
08:45 62 28 154 128 44 35 152 117 306 245
09:00 48 28 54 23
09:15 59 24 54 21
09:30 52 21 72 7
09:45 61 24 220 97 55 16 235 67 455 164
10:00 67 28 47 15
10:15 47 8 62 6
10:30 67 20 52 8
10:45 70 11 251 67 50 7 211 36 462 103
11:00 89 11 63 12
11:15 92 12 57 9
11:30 68 9 61 6
11:45 92 11 341 43 70 8 251 35 592 78
Total 1152 2569 1032 1899 2184 4468
Percent 31.0% 69.0% 35.2% 64.8% 32.8% 67.2%
Grand
Total 1152 2569 1032 1899 2184 4468
Percent 31.0% 69.0% 35.2% 64.8% 32.8% 67.2%
ADT ADT 6,652 AADT 6,652

Page 1 ends

Sierra Madre Boulevard Btwn
Baldwin Avenue & East City Limit

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 49 1 60
12:15 8 46 3 59
12:30 3 39 4 44
12:45 2 53 17 187 1 70 9 233 26 420
01:00 0 61 3 80
01:15 0 50 0 50
01:30 0 43 0 61
01:45 4 44 4 198 0 58 3 249 7 447
02:00 0 43 2 60
02:15 1 45 2 57
02:30 0 42 0 61
02:45 0 49 1 179 1 67 5 245 6 424
03:00 1 43 0 66
03:15 0 54 1 64
03:30 0 50 0 52
03:45 0 35 1 182 0 51 1 233 2 415
04:00 0 30 1 46
04:15 0 34 0 39
04:30 0 36 0 36
04:45 0 44 0 144 2 56 3 177 3 321
05:00 2 37 4 39
05:15 2 37 6 42
05:30 2 29 7 44
05:45 2 34 8 137 3 39 20 164 28 301
06:00 4 41 1 33
06:15 5 25 8 33
06:30 5 44 8 26
06:45 15 29 29 139 12 29 29 121 58 260
07:00 8 35 15 29
07:15 8 24 14 24
07:30 11 18 23 15
07:45 26 23 53 100 38 22 90 90 143 190
08:00 27 14 31 12
08:15 19 30 37 13
08:30 21 18 35 14
08:45 36 14 103 76 53 29 156 68 259 144
09:00 31 11 49 20
09:15 31 12 53 13
09:30 36 9 74 8
09:45 47 11 145 43 46 4 222 45 367 88
10:00 39 10 46 6
10:15 35 6 51 4
10:30 35 13 44 10
10:45 45 8 154 37 54 5 195 25 349 62
11:00 41 9 63 9
11:15 38 9 50 5
11:30 37 6 59 4
11:45 38 4 154 28 59 3 231 21 385 49
Total 669 1450 964 1671 1633 3121
Percent 31.6% 68.4% 36.6% 63.4% 34.4% 65.6%
Grand
Total 669 1450 964 1671 1633 3121
Percent 31.6% 68.4% 36.6% 63.4% 34.4% 65.6%
ADT ADT 4,754 AADT 4,754

Page 1 ends

Sunnyside Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & North City Limit

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 1 6 0 8
12:15 0 8 0 5
12:30 0 5 0 2
12:45 1 11 2 30 0 1 0 16 2 46
01:00 1 9 0 8
01:15 0 3 0 7
01:30 0 3 0 4
01:45 0 4 1 19 0 5 0 24 1 43
02:00 0 13 0 3
02:15 1 11 0 4
02:30 0 6 0 4
02:45 0 4 1 34 0 10 0 21 1 55
03:00 0 6 0 5
03:15 0 4 0 2
03:30 0 5 0 5
03:45 1 9 1 24 0 5 0 17 1 41
04:00 1 5 0 3
04:15 0 5 0 5
04:30 0 9 0 6
04:45 0 5 1 24 0 8 0 22 1 46
05:00 0 10 0 4
05:15 1 3 1 3
05:30 0 1 1 6
05:45 2 7 3 21 2 7 4 20 7 41
06:00 0 2 1 7
06:15 2 3 0 6
06:30 2 4 1 4
06:45 0 3 4 12 0 1 2 18 6 30
07:00 1 1 1 2
07:15 0 3 2 1
07:30 1 6 0 2
07:45 2 0 4 10 2 0 5 5 9 15
08:00 6 4 1 2
08:15 2 2 1 0
08:30 2 4 2 3
08:45 6 3 16 13 7 6 11 11 27 24
09:00 4 1 0 2
09:15 8 0 5 1
09:30 4 1 2 3
09:45 3 3 19 5 6 0 13 6 32 11
10:00 2 2 7 1
10:15 3 1 2 1
10:30 6 1 4 2
10:45 2 1 13 5 5 0 18 4 31 9
11:00 6 2 0 1
11:15 13 3 7 0
11:30 4 0 5 0
11:45 6 0 29 5 2 0 14 1 43 6
Total 94 202 67 165 161 367
Percent 31.8% 68.2% 28.9% 71.1% 30.5% 69.5%
Grand
Total 94 202 67 165 161 367
Percent 31.8% 68.2% 28.9% 71.1% 30.5% 69.5%
ADT ADT 528 AADT 528

Page 1 ends

Sunnyside Avenue Btwn
Sierra Madre Blvd & Orange Grove Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 6 0 9
12:15 0 5 1 11
12:30 0 5 0 13
12:45 1 12 1 28 0 6 1 39 2 67
01:00 0 9 0 10
01:15 1 7 0 5
01:30 0 9 0 7
01:45 0 12 1 37 0 10 0 32 1 69
02:00 0 9 0 4
02:15 0 5 0 8
02:30 1 10 0 6
02:45 0 6 1 30 0 12 0 30 1 60
03:00 0 11 0 8
03:15 0 6 0 10
03:30 0 11 0 3
03:45 0 6 0 34 0 10 0 31 0 65
04:00 0 2 0 4
04:15 0 7 0 11
04:30 0 4 0 5
04:45 0 10 0 23 2 11 2 31 2 54
05:00 0 6 0 9
05:15 0 6 1 13
05:30 0 6 3 5
05:45 1 3 1 21 1 12 5 39 6 60
06:00 1 4 0 4
06:15 1 4 2 6
06:30 0 8 2 5
06:45 2 3 4 19 5 1 9 16 13 35
07:00 0 4 2 5
07:15 0 4 3 2
07:30 1 5 1 2
07:45 2 9 3 22 7 6 13 15 16 37
08:00 3 1 2 2
08:15 4 3 2 1
08:30 4 3 5 2
08:45 3 4 14 11 3 3 12 8 26 19
09:00 4 2 4 4
09:15 3 5 3 3
09:30 6 3 7 3
09:45 7 3 20 13 5 2 19 12 39 25
10:00 3 2 7 3
10:15 3 1 6 1
10:30 7 6 9 2
10:45 9 3 22 12 9 2 31 8 53 20
11:00 7 0 11 2
11:15 11 1 8 3
11:30 3 2 9 3
11:45 7 0 28 3 9 1 37 9 65 12
Total 95 253 129 270 224 523
Percent 27.3% 72.7% 32.3% 67.7% 30.0% 70.0%
Grand
Total 95 253 129 270 224 523
Percent 27.3% 72.7% 32.3% 67.7% 30.0% 70.0%
ADT ADT 747 AADT 747

Page 1 ends

Woodland Drive Btwn
Sturtevant Drive & North City Limit

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 5/17/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 3 1 7
12:15 0 8 0 7
12:30 2 8 0 6
12:45 0 3 4 22 1 5 2 25 6 47
01:00 1 5 0 4
01:15 0 6 0 6
01:30 0 1 1 1
01:45 0 4 1 16 0 4 1 15 2 31
02:00 0 5 0 2
02:15 0 3 1 4
02:30 0 2 0 3
02:45 0 3 0 13 0 1 1 10 1 23
03:00 0 2 0 7
03:15 0 3 1 4
03:30 1 4 0 3
03:45 0 1 1 10 1 5 2 19 3 29
04:00 0 4 0 4
04:15 0 3 1 0
04:30 0 1 1 2
04:45 1 3 1 11 1 1 3 7 4 18
05:00 0 2 2 1
05:15 0 4 1 5
05:30 1 7 5 7
05:45 0 3 1 16 3 4 11 17 12 33
06:00 0 10 2 4
06:15 1 6 7 6
06:30 3 5 5 2
06:45 0 7 4 28 4 6 18 18 22 46
07:00 0 6 2 8
07:15 2 6 2 1
07:30 1 6 3 3
07:45 2 7 5 25 6 3 13 15 18 40
08:00 3 5 6 3
08:15 2 5 5 2
08:30 1 7 5 2
08:45 3 7 9 24 6 4 22 11 31 35
09:00 4 2 7 1
09:15 3 4 6 1
09:30 2 4 6 4
09:45 4 6 13 16 7 4 26 10 39 26
10:00 5 5 13 3
10:15 1 4 5 4
10:30 6 5 6 3
10:45 4 4 16 18 5 1 29 11 45 29
11:00 2 0 5 2
11:15 2 2 7 2
11:30 7 4 6 3
11:45 2 2 13 8 9 1 27 8 40 16
Total 68 207 155 166 223 373
Percent 24.7% 75.3% 48.3% 51.7% 37.4% 62.6%
Grand
Total 68 207 155 166 223 373
Percent 24.7% 75.3% 48.3% 51.7% 37.4% 62.6%
ADT ADT 596 AADT 596

MA R C H
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
City of Sierra Madre
Traffic Study and On-Street
Parking Management Plan on
West Grand View Avenue
July 2025
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 2 Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue....................................................................... 4 South Sunnyside Avenue and Mariposa Avenue ..................................................................... 9 North Michillinda Avenue and West Grand Avenue.............................................................. 14 East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue ...............................................................19 West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street.........................................................................24 West Montecito Avenue and North Michillinda Avenue ........................................................29 West Grand View Avenue Parking Analysis............................................................................34 Tables
Table 1 (Existing Parking Restrictions) ...................................................................................34 Table 2 (Average Occupancy) ................................................................................................35 Attachments
Attachment A – 24 Hour Vehicle Counts (ADT)
Attachment B – Peak Hour Turning Movement, Bike, and Pedestrian Counts Attachment C – All-Way Stop Warrant Sheets
Attachment D – Parking Occupancy Survey
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
2 Executive Summary
Willdan Engineering was asked to conduct studies on six intersections and evaluate the need for all-way stop control and pedestrian and bicycle safety enhancements. The analysis was based on the applicable California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices’ warrants, observations of data and engineering judgement. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and peak hour vehicle turning movement, pedestrian, and bike counts were taken at all six intersections for the study. Additionally, the collision history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 was reviewed for each intersection to determine the crash history.

Intersection Analysis
The findings for each intersection are summarized as follows:

1. Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue - The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show very low volumes at this intersection. Additionally, a review of the collision history indicated that there have not been any collisions at the intersection. The intersection did not meet the warrants for an all-way stop. The data also does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). Therefore, it is recommended that the intersection remain as is and that no further traffic controls be implemented.

2. South Sunnyside Avenue and Mariposa Avenue - The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show very low volumes at this intersection. Additionally, a review of the collision history indicated that there have not been any collisions at the intersection. The intersection did not meet the warrants for an all-way stop.

The data also does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). However, the data indicated that Sunnyside Avenue is the higher volume street, and it is stop-controlled. It is recommended that the stop control at the intersection be moved to the east-west street Mariposa Avenue.

3. North Michillinda Avenue and West Grand View Avenue (shared with the City of Pasadena) - The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection. Additionally, a review of the collision history indicated that there have not been any collisions at the intersection that would be corrected by all-way stop.

The intersection did not meet the warrants for an all-way stop. Although there is a private school located adjacent to the intersection, the data does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs).

Therefore, it is recommended that the intersection remain as is and that no further traffic controls be implemented.

4. East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue - The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection. Additionally, a review of the collision history indicated that there has been one collision at the intersection Sierra Madre Traffic Study
3 that would be corrected by all-way stop. The intersection did not meet the warrants for an all-way stop. The number of school aged pedestrians recorded in the counts did not meet the generally accepted warrants for Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs), despite the existing school south of the intersection.

However, since the existing crosswalk is being used by school children, it is recommended that the existing painted crosswalk be converted to a high-visibility crosswalk and that the pedestrian ramps be upgraded to current Americans with Disabilities (ADA) standards.

5. West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street - The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection. Additionally, a review of the collision history indicated that there have not been any collisions at the intersection that would be corrected by all-way stop. The intersection did not meet the warrants for an all-way stop. Although there is a private school located adjacent to the intersection, the data does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). Therefore, it is recommended that the intersection remain as is and that no further traffic controls be implemented.

6. Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue (shared with the City of Pasadena) - The vehicle volumes on Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue and the pedestrian and bicycle data for the intersection are low.

Additionally, there have been no collisions at the intersection in the records since May 5, 2020 that would be corrected by the installation of an all-way stopcontrolled intersection. The intersection did not meet the warrants for an all-way stop. The data also does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). Therefore, it is recommended that the intersection remain as is and that no further traffic controls be implemented.

West Grand View Avenue Parking Analysis
The parking demand on West Grand View Avenue between Michillinda Avenue and North Baldwin Avenue was analyzed to determine the feasibility of installing “No Parking” along one side of the street on this segment. Data was collected to determine the parking occupancy along West Grand View Avenue during the peak hours on a typical weekday and weekend. The result of calculating the average parking occupancy for the north and south sides of the street segment for both the weekday and weekend indicated that there is less parking demand on the south side of the street. It was determined in the study that parking restrictions should be implemented during peak traffic periods only.

Therefore, it is recommended that parking restrictions be implemented for peak traffic hours along the south side of West Grand Avenue between Michillinda Avenue and North Baldwin Avenue on Monday through Friday to address circulation issues.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
4 Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue
The intersection of Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue has stop controls for eastbound and westbound Fairview Avenue. North Sunnyside Avenue has no controls.

There are also no marked crosswalks. An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an all-way stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersectioNn and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

North Sunnyside Avenue is
designated as a Major Collector in the
Sierra Madre General Plan. North
Sunnyside Avenue is approximately
40 feet wide, and parking is
unrestricted on either side. The
posted speed limit is 30 mph.

Fairview Avenue is a Local Street and
is approximately 36 feet. Parking is
unrestricted on either side and there
is no posted speed limit.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there were no collisions at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12 month period.

Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on Sunnyside Avenue at Fairview Avenue. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025. The following tables summarize the data collected:

N
Fairview Ave
Sunnyside Ave
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
5 Sunnyside Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
North Approach (Southbound) 183 14 (9:15) 20 (2:15)
South Approach (Northbound) 238 22 (11:00) 25 (12:00)
Fairview Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 322 44 (7:15) 24 (4:45)
West Approach (Eastbound) 372 27 (10:45) 33 (12:15)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of Sunnyside Avenue and Fairview Avenue. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the pedestrian and bike data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (Fairview) 8:15 AM 7
West Leg (Fairview) 6:00 PM 6
North Leg (Sunnyside) 6:00 PM 4
South Leg (Sunnyside) 8:15 AM 2
Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour Bike Volume
Northbound (Sunnyside) 8:15 AM 1
Southbound (Sunnyside) 6:00 PM 1
Eastbound (Fairview) 6:00 PM 1
Westbound (Fairview) 8:15 AM 1
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
6 Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of Fairview Avenue and North Sunnyside Avenue were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is met for this location.

B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation.

Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. Not
Satisfied
There were no reported collisions in a recent 12-month time period.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
7 CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)
averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minorstreet vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 11 AM 12 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5PM
Major 300 168 51 58 61 50 46 50 49 44 51
Minor 200 112 31 24 31 25 33 42 36 22 36
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averages 51 vph and 31 vph respectively, on an average day. The major street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 210 vph and the minor street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 140 vph for the eight highest hours. For these reasons, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Warrant D is not satisfied.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
8 Based on the data collected, none of the warrants for an all-way stop are satisfied for the intersection of Fairview Avenue and Sunnyside Avenue.

Recommendations
The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show very low volumes at this intersection.

Additionally, there have not been any collisions at the intersection in the records from May 5, 2020. A review of the warrants for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is not warranted. The data also does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). The data indicated that Fairview Avenue, which is stop controlled, has higher traffic volumes than Sunnyside Avenue. Therefore, the stop control could be moved to the north/south approach from the east/west approach. No further traffic controls are recommended.

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the
intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also
required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood
collector (through) streets of similar design and
operating characteristics where all-way stop control
would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Not
Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the
study intersection.

1. The peak hour left-turn volumes on Fairview Avenue are low and there were no observed left-turn conflicts.

2. The pedestrian volumes are low and there are no conflicts.

3. There are no sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. The two roadways are not collector through streets and all-way stop will not improve the operational characteristics.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
9 Mariposa Avenue and South Sunnyside Avenue
The intersection of Mariposa Avenue and South Sunnyside Avenue has stop controls for northbound and northbound South Sunnyside Avenue. Mariposa Avenue has no controls. There are also no marked crosswalks. An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an all-way stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

North Sunnyside Avenue is
designated as a Major Collector in the
Sierra Madre General Plan. South
Sunnyside Avenue is approximately
36 feet wide, and parking is
unrestricted on either side. The
posted speed limit is 30 mph.

Fairview Avenue is a Local Street and
is approximately 36 feet. Parking is
unrestricted on either side and there
is no posted speed limit.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there were no collisions at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12 month period.

Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on Sunnyside Avenue at Mariposa Avenue. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025. The following tables summarize the data collected:

N
Mariposa Ave
Sunnyside Ave
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
10 Sunnyside Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
North Approach (Southbound) 488 44 (7:15) 47 (3:00)
South Approach (Northbound) 641 91 (7:45) 72 (3:00)
Mariposa Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 370 25 (9:45) 38 (4:00)
West Approach (Eastbound) 353 47 (7:15) 28 (12:15)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of Sunnyside Avenue and Mariposa Avenue. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the pedestrian and bike data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (Mariposa) 8:30 AM 3
West Leg (Mariposa) 8:30 PM 1
North Leg (Sunnyside) 5:00 PM 2
South Leg (Sunnyside) 8:30 AM 5
Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour Bike Volume
Northbound (Sunnyside) N/A 0
Southbound (Sunnyside) 5:00 PM 1
Eastbound (Mariposa) N/A 0
Westbound (Mariposa) 8:30 AM 1
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
11 Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of Sunnyside Avenue and Mariposa Avenue were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is met for this location.

B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation.

Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. Not
Satisfied
There were no reported collisions in a recent 12-month.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
12 CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)
averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minorstreet vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 11 AM 12 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5PM
Major 300 168 91 70 116 74 93 79 119 90 83
Minor 200 112 54 55 53 42 45 60 63 60 52
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averages to 91 vph and 54 vph respectively, on an average day. The major street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 210 vph and the minor street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 140 vph for the eight highest hours. For these reasons, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Warrant D is not satisfied.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
13 Based on the data collected, none of the warrants for an all-way stop are satisfied for the intersection of Mariposa Avenue and Sunnyside Avenue.

Recommendations
The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show very low volumes at this intersection.

Additionally, there have not been any collisions at the intersection in the records from May 5, 2020. A review of the warrants for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is not warranted. The data also does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). The data indicates that Sunnyside Avenue is the higher volume street, and it is stop-controlled. It is recommended that the stop control at the intersection be moved to the east-west street Mariposa Avenue. No further traffic controls are recommended.

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the
intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also
required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood
collector (through) streets of similar design and
operating characteristics where all-way stop control
would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Not
Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the
study intersection.

1. The peak hour left-turn volumes on Mariposa Avenue are low and there were no observed left-turn conflicts.

2. The pedestrian volumes are low and there are no conflicts.

3. There are no sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. The two roadways are not collector through streets and all-way stop will not improve the operational characteristics.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
14 Michillinda Avenue and West Grand View Avenue
The intersection of Michillinda Avenue and West Grand View Avenue is a “T” Intersection that has shared jurisdiction with the City of Pasadena (west of the centerline of Michillinda Avenue). The intersection has stop controls for westbound West Grand View Avenue.

Michillinda Avenue has no controls. The Alverno Heights Academy, a private Kindergarten through 8th grade school, is located on the southeast corner of the intersection. There are also no marked crosswalks. An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an all-way stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

Michillinda Avenue is
designated as a Minor Arterial
in the Sierra Madre General
Plan. South Sunnyside
Avenue is approximately 46
feet wide, and parking is
unrestricted on either side.

The posted speed limit is 35
mph.

West Grand View Avenue is
also designated a Minor
Arterial and is approximately
36 feet wide. Parking is
unrestricted on either side and
the posted speed limit is 30
mph.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there was one collision at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12 month period.

N
W. Grand View Ave
Michillinda Ave
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
15 Date Time Location
Primary
Collision
Factor
Collision Type
1/3/23 8:43 pm
10’ North of
Intersection Right-of-Way Sideswipe
Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on Michillinda Avenue at West Grand View Avenue. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025. The following tables summarize the data collected:

Michillinda Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
North Approach (Southbound) 3,297 239 (7:15) 296 (3:15) South Approach (Northbound) 1,925 205 (7:45) 194 (2:30) West Grand View Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 1,764 300 (7:45) 196 (2:30)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of Michillinda Avenue and West Grand View Avenue. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (W. Grand View) 8:45 AM 2
West Leg (W. Grand View) N/A 0
North Leg (Michillinda) N/A 0
South Leg (Michillinda) 8:45 AM 2
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
16 Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour Bike Volume
Northbound (Michillinda) 6:00 PM 2
Southbound (Michillinda) 8:45 AM 2
Eastbound (W. Grand View) 6:00 PM 1
Westbound (W. Grand View) 6:00 PM 3
Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of Michillinda Avenue at West Grand View Avenue were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is met for this location.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
17 CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation.

Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. Not
Satisfied
There were no reported collisions in a recent 12-month period that would be corrected by an all way stop.

C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)
averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minorstreet vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 12 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6PM
Major 300 168 394 371 395 387 412 460 400 412 311
Minor 200 112 145 178 245 87 140 179 122 117 90
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averages 394 vph and 145 vph respectively, on an average day. The major street satisfies the minimum average volume of 300 vph, but the minor street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 200 vph for the eight highest hours. For these reasons, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
18 CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
Warrant D is not satisfied.

E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the
intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating
characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Not
Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the study intersection.

1. The peak hour left-turn volumes on West Grand View Avenue are low and there were no observed left-turn conflicts.

2. The pedestrian volumes are low and there are no conflicts.

3. There are no sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. The two roadways are not collector through streets and all-way stop will not improve the operational characteristics.

Based on the data collected, none of the warrants for an all-way stop are satisfied for the intersection of Michillinda Avenue and West Grand View Avenue.

Recommendations
The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection.

Additionally, there have not been any collisions at the intersection in the records from May 5, 2020 that would be corrected by the installation of an all-way stop-controlled intersection. A review of the warrants for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is not warranted. Although there is a private school located adjacent to the intersection, the data does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs).

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
19 East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue
The intersection of East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue has stop controls for northbound and southbound North Canon Avenue. East Grand View Avenue has no controls. Sierra Madre Middle School is located less than a quarter of a mile (approximately 700 feet) south of the intersection. There is a yellow marked crosswalk on the east leg of the intersection. An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an allway stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

East Grand View Avenue is
designated as a Minor Arterial
in the Sierra Madre General
Plan. South Sunnyside
Avenue is approximately 36
feet wide, and parking is
unrestricted on either side.

The posted speed limit is 30
mph.

North Canon Avenue is
designated a Local Street and
is approximately 36 feet wide.

Parking is unrestricted on
either side. There is no posted
speed limit is 30 mph.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there was one collision at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12 month period.

N
E. Grand View Ave
N. Canon Ave
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
20 Date Time Location
Primary
Collision
Factor
Collision Type
12/10/24 8:07 am At Intersection Right-of-Way Broadside Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025. The following tables summarize the data collected:

North Canon Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
North Approach (Southbound) 319 33 (10:15) 34 (6:00)
South Approach (Northbound) 417 90 (7:30) 65 (3:00)
East Grand View Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 1,628 221 (7:30) 124 (2:30)
West Approach (Eastbound) 1,613 148 (7:30) 193 (2:45)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (E. Grand View) 8:30 AM 9
West Leg (E. Grand View) 8:30 AM 4
North Leg (N. Canon) 8:30 AM 7
South Leg (N. Canon) 8:30 AM 6
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
21 Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour Bike Volume
Northbound (N. Canon) 5:00 PM 1
Southbound (N. Canon) 5:00 PM 1
Eastbound (E. Grand View) 8:30 AM 3
Westbound (E. Grand View) 8:30 AM 2
Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is met for this location.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
22 CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation.

Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. Not
Satisfied
There was one reported collision in a recent 12-month period that would be corrected by an all way stop.

C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)
averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minorstreet vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6PM
Major 300 168 255 294 269 229 240 303 258 238 212
Minor 200 112 53 58 92 31 36 34 96 48 31
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averages 255 vph and 53 vph respectively, on an average day. Neither the major street satisfies the minimum average volume of 300 vph nor the minor street satisfies the minimum average volume of 200 vph for the eight highest hours. For these reasons, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
23 CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
Warrant D is not satisfied.

E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the
intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating
characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Not
Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the study intersection.

1. The peak hour left-turn volumes are low and there were no observed left-turn conflicts.

2. The pedestrian volumes are low and there are no conflicts.

3. There are no sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. The two roadways are not collector through streets and all-way stop will not improve the operational characteristics.

Based on the data collected, none of the warrants for an all-way stop are satisfied for the intersection of East Grand View Avenue and North Canon Avenue.

Recommendations
The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection.

Additionally, there was only one collision at the intersection in the records since May 5, 2020 that would be corrected by the installation of an all-way stop-controlled intersection. A review of the warrants for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is not warranted. Considering the close proximity of a school south of the intersection, the data was analyzed to see if it met the generally accepted warrants for Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). The number of school aged pedestrians recorded in the counts did not meet the warrant. However, since the existing crosswalk is being used by school children, it is recommended that the existing painted crosswalk be converted to a high-visibility crosswalk and that the pedestrian ramps be upgraded to current standards as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
24 West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street
The intersection of West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street is a “T” intersection with stop controls for northbound Wilson Street. West Grand View Avenue has no controls.

The Alverno Heights Academy, a private Kindergarten through 8th grade school, is located on the southwest corner of the intersection. An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an all-way stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

West Grand View Avenue is
designated as a Minor Arterial
in the Sierra Madre General
Plan and is approximately 36
feet wide. Parking is
unrestricted on either side and
the posted speed limit is 30
mph.

Wilson Street is designated a
Local Street and is
approximately 36 feet wide.

Parking is unrestricted on
either side. There is no posted
speed limit.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there were no collisions at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12- month period.

N
W. Grand View Ave
Wilson St
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
25 Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025. The following tables summarize the data collected:

Wilson Street Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
South Approach (Northbound) 74 15 (7:15) 21 (2:30)
West Grand View Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 1,760 298 (7:45) 196 (2:30)
West Approach (Eastbound) 1,822 163 (7:15) 214 (3:30)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (W. Grand View) 5:00 PM 2
West Leg (W. Grand View) 6:00 PM 2
North Leg (Wilson) N/A 0
South Leg (Wilson) 8:30 AM 14
Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour Bike Volume
Northbound (Wilson St) N/A 0
Eastbound (W. Grand View) 8:30 AM 2
Westbound (W. Grand View) 8:30 AM 3
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
26 Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is met for this location.

B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation.

Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. Not
Satisfied
There was no reported collisions in a recent 12-month period that would be corrected by an all way stop.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
27 CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)
averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minorstreet vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6PM
Major 300 168 299 318 333 222 297 363 319 307 231
Minor 200 112 7 11 7 2 3 21 5 3 4
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averaged 299 vph and 7 vph respectively, on an average day. Neither the major street satisfies the minimum average volume of 300 vph nor the minor street satisfies the minimum average volume of 200 vph for the eight highest hours. For these reasons, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Warrant D is not satisfied.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
28 Based on the data collected, none of the warrants for an all-way stop are satisfied for the intersection of West Grand View Avenue and Wilson Street.

Recommendations
The vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle data show low volumes at this intersection.

Additionally, there were no collisions at the intersection in the records since May 5, 2020 that would be corrected by the installation of an all-way stop-controlled intersection. A review of the warrants for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is not warranted. Although there is an existing school on the southwest corner, the data did not meet the generally accepted warrants for a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs) installation.

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the
intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also
required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood
collector (through) streets of similar design and
operating characteristics where all-way stop control
would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Not
Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the
study intersection.

1. The peak hour left-turn volumes are low and there were no observed left-turn conflicts.

2. The pedestrian volumes are low and there are no conflicts.

3. There are no sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. The two roadways are not collector through streets and all-way stop will not improve the operational characteristics.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
29 Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue The intersection of Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue has stop controls for eastbound Valley View Avenue and westbound Montecito Avenue. The intersection has shared jurisdiction with the City of Pasadena (west of the centerline of Michillinda Avenue). An All-Way Stop Warrant analysis for the intersection was conducted for this study. Additionally, the data was analyzed to see if a marked crosswalk or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RRFB) should be installed if an all-way stop was not warranted. This analysis is based on the combination of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection and on traffic signal guidelines presented in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Revision 9 dated April 1, 2025.

Michillinda Avenue is
designated as a Minor Arterial
in the Sierra Madre General
Plan and is approximately 46
feet wide. Parking is
unrestricted on either side and
the posted speed limit is 35
mph.

Valley View Avenue (west of
Michillinda Avenue) is located
within the jurisdiction of
Pasadena. The roadway is
approximately 56 feet wide.

Parking is unrestricted on
either side. The posted speed
limit is 25 mph.

Montecito Street (east of
Michillinda Avenue) is
designated a Local Street and
is approximately 30 feet wide.

Parking is unrestricted on
either side and there is no
posted speed limit.

Traffic Collision History
A review of reported accident history from California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database from May 5, 2020 through January 28, 2025 indicated there were no collisions at or within 50 feet of the study intersection within a 12- month period.

N
Valley View Ave Montecito Ave Michillinda Ave
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
30 Traffic Volume
Twenty-four (24) hour approach counts were collected on Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue. These counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025.

The following tables summarize the data collected:

Michillinda Avenue Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
South Approach (Northbound) 4,751 381 (7:15) 447 (4:30) North Approach (Southbound) 4,415 613 (7:45) 445 (2:30) Valley View Street/Montecito
Avenue
Approach
Volume
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
East Approach (Westbound) 476 56 (7:30) 27 (3:00)
West Approach (Eastbound) 281 34 (7:00) 55 (5:30)
Attachment A provides the traffic volume data sheets collected for the study intersection Pedestrian Volume
Turning movement counts with pedestrians and bicycles were collected at the intersection of Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue. The counts were taken on Thursday May 22, 2025, between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following table summarizes the data collected:

Pedestrian Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour
Pedestrian
Volume
East Leg (Valley View) 5:15 PM 9
West Leg (Montecito) 5:15 PM 8
North Leg (Michillinda) 8:30 AM 4
South Leg (Michillinda) N/A 0
Bike Volumes
Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour Bike Volume
Northbound (Michillinda) 8:30 AM 2
Southbound (Michillinda) 5:15 PM 2
Westbound (Montecito) 8:30 AM 1
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
31 Intersection Crossing Peak
Hour Bike Volume
Eastbound (Valley View) 5:15 PM 2
Attachment B provides the peak hour pedestrian volume data sheets collected for the study intersection.

All Way Stop Warrant
The installation of multi-way or all-way stop signs is based on guidelines in the CA MUTCD, Chapter 2, Section 2B.07. These guidelines, or warrants, consider the most recent reported collision history and traffic volumes entering the intersection, to justify the installation of “Stop” signs. We will use these CA MUTCD warrants to evaluate the need for “Stop” sign(s) at the respective intersection.
“Stop” control is intended to assign positive right-of-way at intersections. The control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right-of-way assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic on the minor street exceeds 200 vehicles per hour (vph) for any eight hours of an average day. Intersecting streets that have about the same amount of traffic, lend credibility to the higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.

The table below summarizes the CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop guidelines (Attachment C) as applied to the study intersection. The Multi-Way stop control criteria applied to the intersection of Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue were not satisfied as shown below:

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
A. Traffic Signal – Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Not
Satisfied
The peak hour traffic signal warrant is met for this location.

B. Collisions – Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation.

Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

Not
Satisfied
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
32 CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
There were no reported collisions in a recent 12-month period that would be corrected by an all way stop.

C. Minimum Volume and Delay

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)
averages at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) for any 8 hours of an average day;

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minorstreet vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Not
Street Satisfied
Min
Volume 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 12 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6PM
Major 300 168 714 727 842 575 694 854 744 731 543
Minor 200 112 58 68 66 44 42 68 66 56 57
The number of vehicles entering the intersection from both the major and the minor streets averaged 714 vph and 58 vph respectively, on an average day. The major street satisfies the minimum average volume of 300 vph but the minor street does not satisfy the minimum average volume of 200 vph for the eight highest hours. Therefore, the vehicular volume warrant is not satisfied.

D. 80% Volumes, Delays and Crashes if no single warrant is satisfied then:

1. If there are 4 or more reported accidents within 12-months period of a correctable type of stop sign, and

2. Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and

3. Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the hour
Not
Satisfied
Warrant D is not satisfied.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
33 Based on the data collected, none of the warrants for an all-way stop are satisfied for the intersection of Michillinda Avenue and Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue.

Recommendations
The vehicle volumes on Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue and the pedestrian and bicycle data for the intersection show are low. Additionally, there have been no collisions at the intersection in the records since May 5, 2020 that would be corrected by the installation of an all-way stop-controlled intersection. A review of the warrants for an all-way stop-controlled intersection found that an all-way stop is not warranted. The data also does not support the installation of a marked crosswalk or Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs). Therefore, it is recommended that the intersection remain as is and that no further traffic controls be implemented.

CA-MUTCD Guidelines Result
E. Other Criteria such as:

1. The need to control left-turn conflicts;

2. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;

3. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the
intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also
required to stop; and

4. An intersection of two residential neighborhood
collector (through) streets of similar design and
operating characteristics where all-way stop control
would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Not
Satisfied
This criterion is not satisfied using the following special conditions at the
study intersection.

1. The peak hour left-turn volumes are low and there were no observed left-turn conflicts.

2. The pedestrian volumes are low and there are no conflicts.

3. There are no sight distance difficulties at the intersection.

4. The two roadways are not collector through streets and all-way stop will not improve the operational characteristics.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study
34 West Grand View Avenue Parking Analysis
Willdan has evaluated the parking demand on West Grand View Avenue between Michillinda Avenue and North Baldwin Avenue to determine the feasibility of installing “No Parking” along one side of the street on this segment. This segment is displayed below.

West Grand View Avenue is classified as a Minor Arterial in the Sierra Madre General Plan. The street is 36 feet wide, and parking is allowed on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.

Parking Inventory
An inventory of the existing number of parking spaces and the parking restrictions for West Grand View Avenue was taken for this analysis. Table 1, below, indicates the number of spaces between segments and the existing parking restrictions (if any). The parking spaces were estimated by the length of the available parking area. The data sheets from the parking occupancy survey can be found in Attachment D.

Table 1
Existing Parking Restrictions
Street From To Side of the
Street
Restriction Approximate
Spaces
W Grand View Ave Michillinda Ave Wilson St S No Parking on City Streets 2am – 5am 28
W Grand View Ave Wilson St Jameson Ct S No Restrictions 39 W Grand View Ave Jameson Ct N. Lima St S No Restrictions 23 W Grand View Ave N. Lima St Auburn Ave S No Restrictions 53 W Grand View Ave Auburn Av N. Baldwin Ave S No Restrictions 25 W Grand View Ave N. Baldwin Ave Auburn Ave N No Restrictions 23 W Grand View Ave Auburn Ave N. Lima St N No Restrictions 53 W Grand View Ave N. Lima St Sunnyside Ave N No Restrictions 50 W Grand View Ave Sunnyside Ave Michillinda Ave N No Restrictions 36 N
West Grand View Ave
Michillinda Ave
N. Baldwin Ave
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
35 Parking Occupancy
To assess the current usage of the on-street parking along West Grand View Avenue, a count of the cars parked in the available spaces was taken every hour for six hours on a weekday (Wednesday) and a weekend (Saturday). The number of cars parked along the segment were counted on Wednesday, May 28, 2025, and Saturday, May 31, 2025.

Different hours for the count were chosen on the weekday versus the weekend to reflect the peak traffic times for the segment. The hourly turnover counts were counted during the following hours for each day:
• Wednesday – 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM, 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM
• Saturday – 12:00 PM to 5:00 PM
The parking occupancy per hour was calculated from the count data received. Table 2, below, indicates the average occupancy for the north and south segments of West Grand View Avenue between Michillinda Avenue and North Baldwin Avenue. The occupancy count on Wednesday included three hours during the AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hours.

The table shows the averages for all six hours and for the three peak hours. The analysis indicates that the parking occupancy minimal and that the south side of West Grand View Avenue has a lower parking occupancy.

Table 2
Average Occupancy
Street Side of
the
Street
Average Occupancy
Wednesday – May 28, 2025
W Grand View Ave N Overall = 8% (AM=6%, PM=8%)
W Grand View Ave S Overall = 5% (AM=4%, PM=7%)
Saturday – May 31, 2025
W Grand View Ave N 8%
W Grand View Ave S 5%
Recommendations
West Grand View Avenue is approximately 36 feet wide and with parking on either side that leaves approximately 10 feet for the westbound and eastbound traffic lanes, which has led to concerns during the busier traffic times. Therefore, the parking occupancy was studied to determine if restricting parking along the north or south sides of the street could be implemented to assist in traffic circulation. The parking study determined that the south side of West Grand View Avenue generally has the lower parking occupancy and would be the best choice for installing parking restrictions. The vehicular volume data indicates that along West Grand Avenue the highest peak hours are 7 AM to 10 AM and Sierra Madre Traffic Study
36 2 PM to 5 PM. It is recommended that peak hour parking restrictions be implemented for these peak hours along the south side of West Grand Avenue between Michillinda Avenue and North Baldwin Avenue on Monday through Friday to address circulation issues.

Sierra Madre Traffic Study

ATTACHMENT A
24 Hour Vehicle Counts (ADT)
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME

DAILY TOTALS
N Sunnyside Ave & Fairview Ave
Day: Thursday City: Sierra Madre
Date: 5/22/2025 Project #: CA25_020178_001

NB SB EB WB
Total
238 183 372 322 1,115
al
TIME
0:00
0:15
0:30
0:45
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
6:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

NB SB EB WB
0 0 0 0
0 0 2 1
0 0 3 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 1
0 0 2 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
0 1 1 1
0 1 0 1
3 0 0 4
0 0 5 1
2 2 1 1
2 0 4 1
1 1 2 4
2 2 6 11
3 3 7 7
4 2 5 7
5 3 5 10
5 4 9 20
6 2 1 6
5 2 3 8
4 3 9 5
2 2 6 11
3 3 7 9
4 5 4 6
3 3 4 3
5 3 4 3
3 2 3 5
5 3 2 7
4 4 9 6
6 3 7 3
3 2 5 7
7 3 6 4
6 3 4 10
94 62 128 165
21% 14% 29% 37%
TOTAL
0 3
3 1
0 0
0 2
3 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 3
2 7
6 6
7 8
21 20
18 23
38 15
18 21
21 22
19 13
15 13
17 23
19 17
20 23
449
40%
TIME
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

NB SB EB WB
6 5 6 6
8 3 8 4
9 5 8 9
2 4 7 2
1 2 10 2
4 3 3 3
3 4 3 5
3 3 5 5
3 2 4 1
2 3 3 7
6 11 3 1
2 3 8 3
7 3 9 4
5 2 10 5
3 5 3 5
7 4 7 6
6 2 3 2
5 1 6 6
1 3 7 1
3 1 8 11
10 5 10 5
1 4 7 5
5 3 6 3
4 4 8 7
4 5 10 3
4 4 4 1
4 3 4 3
3 3 4 2
4 2 5 6
2 2 7 2
2 3 7 3
2 2 3 3
2 3 3 3
0 2 6 0
4 1 3 0
1 0 6 4
3 2 2 3
1 1 3 5
1 0 6 0
0 0 2 2
1 2 0 2
0 0 5 3
0 0 2 0
0 0 4 0
0 0 0 1
0 1 2 1
0 0 3 1
0 0 1 1
144 121 244 157
22% 18% 37% 24%
TOTAL
23 23
31 15
15 13
15 16
10 15
21 16
23 22
16 24
13 18
12 23
30 17
17 23
22 13
14 12
17 13
15 10
11 8
8 11
10 10
7 4
5 8
2 4
1 4
4 2
666
60%
TIME
00:00 01:00
01:00 02:00
02:00 03:00
03:00 04:00
04:00 05:00
05:00 06:00
06:00 07:00
07:00 08:00
08:00 09:00
09:00 10:00
10:00 11:00
11:00 12:00
12:00 13:00
13:00 14:00
14:00 15:00
15:00 16:00
16:00 17:00
17:00 18:00
18:00 19:00
19:00 20:00
20:00 21:00
21:00 22:00
22:00 23:00
23:00 00:00
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor

NB SB EB WB
1 0 5 1
0 0 1 1
0 0 3 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
3 2 1 7
5 3 12 7
14 10 23 35
20 11 22 39
12 13 21 29
17 12 18 21
22 11 22 24
25 17 29 21
11 12 21 15
13 19 18 12
22 14 29 20
15 7 24 20
20 16 31 20
15 15 22 9
10 9 22 14
7 6 18 7
5 3 13 10
1 2 11 5
0 1 6 4

STATISTICS

NB SB EB WB
00:00 to 12:00
94 62 128 165
11:00 9:15 10:45 7:15
22 14 27 44

0.786 0.700 0.750 0.550
12:00 to 00:00
144 121 244 157
12:00 14:15 12:15 16:45
25 20 33 24

0.694 0.455 0.825 0.545
07:00 to 09:00
34 21 45 74
7:45 7:15 7:15 7:15
21 12 26 44

0.875 0.750 0.722 0.550
16:00 to 18:00
35 23 55 40
17:00 17:00 16:30 16:45
20 16 32 24

0.500 0.800 0.800 0.545
TOTAL
7 2
4 0
0 13
27 82
92 75
68 79
92 59
62 85
66 87
61 55
38 31
19 11
TOTAL
449
7:15
99 0.651
666
12:00
92 0.742
174
7:15
99 0.651
153
16:45
87 0.725
45 40
35 30
25 20
15 10
5 0

NB SB EB WB
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME

DAILY TOTALS
S Sunnyside Ave & Mariposa Ave
Day: Thursday City: Sierra Madre
Date: 5/22/2025 Project #: CA25_020178_005

NB SB EB WB
Total
488 641 370 353 1,852
al
TIME
0:00
0:15
0:30
0:45
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
6:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

NB SB EB WB
2 0 2 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
0 1 1 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 1 1
1 3 0 0
0 2 0 1
0 2 1 0
0 0 0 0
4 0 1 0
1 1 1 1
0 2 0 0
2 3 1 1
2 3 5 4
1 4 3 5
6 9 2 5
9 11 5 9
13 17 7 19
16 42 8 14
6 18 2 5
5 14 5 6
7 8 6 7
7 4 6 4
9 8 1 4
6 7 3 6
9 8 6 6
8 7 7 7
4 6 6 7
6 5 6 3
4 7 2 12
12 14 4 8
6 8 4 2
7 7 3 5
10 10 5 11
165 236 106 155
25% 36% 16% 23%
TOTAL
4 0
0 0
1 0
1 1
1 0
0 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
3 4
3 3
0 5
4 2
7 14
13 22
34 56
80 31
30 28
21 22
22 29
29 23
20 25
38 20
22 36
662
36%
TIME
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

NB SB EB WB
8 20 4 4
15 16 3 9
10 9 5 7
5 10 9 4
6 7 3 8
8 8 8 7
12 8 4 5
10 8 5 8
6 9 11 6
9 16 7 4
6 11 11 6
6 16 7 8
17 27 10 6
10 13 8 6
7 12 7 8
13 20 12 6
9 15 10 6
8 12 7 6
9 12 8 7
11 14 13 3
10 11 5 7
12 9 8 2
9 9 11 7
11 12 11 1
5 10 6 7
12 12 7 7
5 9 4 7
6 2 2 4
10 10 5 4
6 13 2 9
7 4 5 1
7 4 3 1
6 3 1 2
4 2 3 1
3 7 4 2
6 6 8 0
5 2 6 1
3 1 3 2
3 3 3 1
2 2 3 1
2 4 4 2
0 1 1 1
2 2 1 1
1 0 1 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 3 0
0 3 1 3
1 0 1 0
323 405 264 198
27% 34% 22% 17%
TOTAL
36 43
31 28
24 31
29 31
32 36
34 37
60 37
34 51
40 33
36 41
33 31
36 35
28 38
25 14
29 30
17 15
12 10
16 20
14 9
10 8
12 3
6 2
1 3
7 2
1190
64%
TIME
00:00 01:00
01:00 02:00
02:00 03:00
03:00 04:00
04:00 05:00
05:00 06:00
06:00 07:00
07:00 08:00
08:00 09:00
09:00 10:00
10:00 11:00
11:00 12:00
12:00 13:00
13:00 14:00
14:00 15:00
15:00 16:00
16:00 17:00
17:00 18:00
18:00 19:00
19:00 20:00
20:00 21:00
21:00 22:00
22:00 23:00
23:00 00:00
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor

NB SB EB WB
2 0 2 0
1 1 0 1
0 1 1 0
1 1 1 1
1 6 2 1
4 4 2 1
5 9 7 6
29 41 17 38
34 82 21 32
31 27 16 20
22 25 21 29
35 39 16 26
38 55 21 24
36 31 20 28
27 52 36 24
47 72 37 26
37 53 38 22
42 41 35 17
28 33 19 25
30 31 15 15
19 18 16 5
13 8 15 5
5 7 7 4
1 4 5 3

STATISTICS

NB SB EB WB
00:00 to 12:00
165 236 106 155
7:15 7:45 9:45 7:15
44 91 25 47

0.688 0.542 0.893 0.618
12:00 to 00:00
323 405 264 198
15:00 15:00 16:00 12:15
47 72 38 28

0.691 0.667 0.731 0.778
07:00 to 09:00
63 123 38 70
7:15 7:45 7:15 7:15
44 91 22 47

0.688 0.542 0.688 0.618
16:00 to 18:00
79 94 73 39
16:30 16:00 16:00 16:15
42 53 38 23

0.875 0.883 0.731 0.821
TOTAL
4 3
2 4
10 11
27 125
169
94 97
116
138
115
139
182
150
135
105
91 58
41 23
13 TOTAL
662
7:30
201

0.628
1190
15:00
182

0.758
294
7:30
201

0.628
285
16:00
150

0.915
90 80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0

NB SB EB WB
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME

DAILY TOTALS
Michillinda Ave & W Grand View Ave
Day: Thursday City: Sierra Madre
Date: 5/22/2025 Project #: CA25_020178_009

NB SB EB WB
Total
3,297 1,925 0 1,764 6,986
al

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 2 1 1 4 12:00 69 31 22 122 00:00 01:00 16 6 3 25
0:15 4 2 0 6 12:15 61 36 20 117 01:00 02:00 11 2 4 17
0:30 6 0 2 8 12:30 78 30 19 127 02:00 03:00 7 3 0 10
0:45 4 3 0 7 12:45 53 29 26 108 03:00 04:00 1 1 2 4
1:00 3 1 0 4 13:00 48 23 25 96 04:00 05:00 2 3 4 9
1:15 3 1 1 5 13:15 51 26 32 109 05:00 06:00 13 27 13 53 1:30 2 0 1 3 13:30 43 30 25 98 06:00 07:00 62 47 33 142 1:45 3 0 2 5 13:45 53 30 23 106 07:00 08:00 208 163 178 549 2:00 4 2 0 6 14:00 52 37 29 118 08:00 09:00 212 183 245 640 2:15 2 0 0 2 14:15 71 33 34 138 09:00 10:00 148 130 116 394 2:30 1 0 0 1 14:30 57 50 42 149 10:00 11:00 152 117 92 361 2:45 0 1 0 1 14:45 73 39 35 147 11:00 12:00 173 136 95 404 3:00 1 0 0 1 15:00 63 47 58 168 12:00 13:00 261 126 87 474 3:15 0 0 1 1 15:15 76 58 61 195 13:00 14:00 195 109 105 409 3:30 0 1 0 1 15:30 65 33 36 134 14:00 15:00 253 159 140 552 3:45 0 0 1 1 15:45 84 34 24 142 15:00 16:00 288 172 179 639 4:00 1 0 0 1 16:00 71 36 23 130 16:00 17:00 269 131 122 522 4:15 1 0 0 1 16:15 67 39 38 144 17:00 18:00 286 126 117 529 4:30 0 2 0 2 16:30 69 21 33 123 18:00 19:00 227 84 90 401 4:45 0 1 4 5 16:45 62 35 28 125 19:00 20:00 171 79 62 312 5:00 1 6 5 12 17:00 72 35 24 131 20:00 21:00 123 48 42 213 5:15 5 3 2 10 17:15 77 34 33 144 21:00 22:00 123 45 18 186 5:30 4 6 2 12 17:30 67 31 25 123 22:00 23:00 60 15 13 88 5:45 3 12 4 19 17:45 70 26 35 131 23:00 00:00 36 13 4 53 6:00 4 9 6 19 18:00 62 27 29 118 STATISTICS
6:15 17 12 4 33 18:15 67 16 26 109 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 12 7 7 26 18:30 54 21 16 91 Peak Period 00:00 to 12:00 6:45 29 19 16 64 18:45 44 20 19 83 Volume 1005 818 785 2608 7:00 28 30 20 78 19:00 45 19 17 81 Peak Hour 7:15 7:45 7:45 7:30 7:15 54 32 31 117 19:15 45 28 14 87 Peak Volume 239 205 300 722 7:30 72 39 39 150 19:30 49 14 18 81 Peak Hour Factor 0.830 0.827 0.743 0.843 7:45 54 62 88 204 19:45 32 18 13 63
8:00 59 54 101 214 20:00 34 14 10 58 Peak Period 12:00 to 00:00 8:15 46 43 65 154 20:15 28 14 11 53 Volume 2292 1107 979 4378 8:30 58 46 46 150 20:30 32 7 12 51 Peak Hour 15:15 14:30 14:30 14:30 8:45 49 40 33 122 20:45 29 13 9 51 Peak Volume 296 194 196 659 9:00 42 34 29 105 21:00 44 14 4 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.881 0.836 0.803 0.845 9:15 31 29 39 99 21:15 32 17 6 55
9:30 43 37 25 105 21:30 35 7 5 47 Peak Period 07:00 to 09:00 9:45 32 30 23 85 21:45 12 7 3 22 Volume 420 346 423 1189 10:00 46 29 26 101 22:00 14 5 4 23 Peak Hour 7:15 7:45 7:45 7:30 10:15 28 30 22 80 22:15 18 5 2 25 Peak Volume 239 205 300 722 10:30 41 28 23 92 22:30 14 4 4 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.830 0.827 0.743 0.843 10:45 37 30 21 88 22:45 14 1 3 18
11:00 48 35 28 111 23:00 9 3 0 12 Peak Period 16:00 to 18:00 11:15 39 32 20 91 23:15 10 3 2 15 Volume 555 257 239 1051 11:30 34 33 24 91 23:30 13 3 1 17 Peak Hour 17:00 16:45 16:15 17:00 11:45 52 36 23 111 23:45 4 4 1 9 Peak Volume 286 135 123 529 TOTALS 1005 818 0 785 2608 TOTALS 2292 1107 0 979 4378 Peak Hour Factor 0.929 0.964 0.809 0.918 SPLIT % 39% 31% 0% 30% 37% SPLIT % 52% 25% 0% 22% 63%
350
300
250
200
150
100
50 0

NB SB EB WB
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME

DAILY TOTALS
N Canon Ave & E Grand View Ave
Day: Thursday City: Sierra Madre
Date: 5/22/2025 Project #: CA25_020178_012

NB SB EB WB
Total
417 319 1,628 1,613 3,977
al
TIME
0:00
0:15
0:30
0:45
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
6:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

NB SB EB WB
1 0 2 4
0 0 1 1
0 0 1 1
0 0 2 1
0 0 0 1
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
1 0 0 0
1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 1
1 0 2 1
0 0 4 2
0 2 3 2
0 3 4 3
0 1 0 6
2 1 3 6
0 3 1 4
4 1 4 12
1 4 6 20
0 5 7 22
5 4 10 33
5 8 22 63
24 7 59 78
44 6 43 46
17 4 24 34
3 8 22 40
3 7 30 30
5 3 28 25
4 6 29 40
3 4 22 32
3 3 24 29
2 7 20 34
9 7 20 26
5 10 14 15
8 6 24 22
1 10 21 31
2 4 22 23
8 5 26 26
9 4 17 17
172 134 519 736
11% 9% 33% 47%
TOTAL
7 2
2 3
1 1
2 1
2 0
1 2
0 0
1 0
0 0
2 4
6 7
10 7
12 8
21 31
34 52
98 168
139
79 73
70 61
79 61
59 63
62 44
60 63
51 65
47 1561
39%
TIME
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

NB SB EB WB
2 6 27 33
2 9 27 22
10 8 17 19
5 6 14 25
7 6 15 22
5 3 20 23
3 6 26 24
2 4 30 25
2 5 27 27
3 4 30 23
7 3 24 27
4 6 44 38
37 14 66 33
16 7 49 26
6 5 34 27
6 5 37 31
6 6 52 19
11 5 35 27
4 2 37 30
7 7 37 21
4 3 42 23
5 1 33 22
2 3 34 29
5 8 33 22
8 10 36 30
8 9 32 19
4 6 25 20
5 9 21 29
1 3 29 17
7 1 25 18
0 0 12 16
6 2 18 13
4 0 12 16
2 2 10 14
17 2 13 10
1 3 8 6
7 0 12 10
3 1 11 4
3 1 7 5
3 2 11 10
0 1 10 4
0 0 3 2
0 0 4 2
4 0 9 1
0 0 5 5
1 0 1 3
0 1 1 3
0 0 4 2
245 185 1109 877
10% 8% 46% 36%
TOTAL
68 60
54 50
50 51
59 61
61 60
61 92
150
98 72
79 83
78 73
72 72
61 68
68 84
68 55
64 50
51 28
39 32
28 42
18 29
19 16
26 15
5 6
14 10
5 5
6 2416
61%
TIME
00:00 01:00
01:00 02:00
02:00 03:00
03:00 04:00
04:00 05:00
05:00 06:00
06:00 07:00
07:00 08:00
08:00 09:00
09:00 10:00
10:00 11:00
11:00 12:00
12:00 13:00
13:00 14:00
14:00 15:00
15:00 16:00
16:00 17:00
17:00 18:00
18:00 19:00
19:00 20:00
20:00 21:00
21:00 22:00
22:00 23:00
23:00 00:00
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor

NB SB EB WB
1 0 6 7
2 0 0 3
1 0 2 2
0 0 0 1
1 1 2 2
0 6 11 13
7 9 14 42
34 24 98 196
67 25 119 150
15 16 103 126
24 30 78 97
20 23 86 97
19 29 85 99
17 19 91 94
16 18 125 115
65 31 186 117
28 20 161 97
16 15 142 96
25 34 114 98
14 6 84 64
24 7 43 46
16 4 41 29
4 1 26 9
1 1 11 13

STATISTICS

NB SB EB WB
00:00 to 12:00
172 134 519 736
7:30 10:15 7:30 7:30
90 33 148 221

0.511 0.825 0.627 0.708
12:00 to 00:00
245 185 1109 877
15:00 18:00 14:45 14:30
65 34 193 124

0.439 0.850 0.731 0.816
07:00 to 09:00
101 49 217 346
7:30 7:15 7:30 7:30
90 25 148 221

0.511 0.781 0.627 0.708
16:00 to 18:00
44 35 303 193
16:00 16:00 16:00 16:15
28 20 161 101

0.636 0.714 0.774 0.842
TOTAL
14 5
5 1
6 30
72 352
361
260
229
226
232
221
274
399
306
269
271
168
120
90 40
26 TOTAL
1561
7:30
484

0.720
2416
14:45
412

0.687
713
7:30
484

0.720
575
16:00
306

0.922
250
200
150
100
50 0

NB SB EB WB
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME

DAILY TOTALS
Wilson St & W Grand View Ave
Day: Thursday City: Sierra Madre
Date: 5/22/2025 Project #: CA25_020178_016

NB SB EB WB
Total
74 0 1,822 1,760 3,656
l

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 1 0 0 1 12:00 0 38 26 64 00:00 01:00 1 3 2 6
0:15 0 1 0 1 12:15 2 30 21 53 01:00 02:00 0 3 4 7
0:30 0 1 2 3 12:30 0 40 17 57 02:00 03:00 0 3 0 3
0:45 0 1 0 1 12:45 0 24 26 50 03:00 04:00 0 0 2 2
1:00 0 1 0 1 13:00 1 24 24 49 04:00 05:00 0 2 3 5
1:15 0 1 1 2 13:15 1 25 30 56 05:00 06:00 1 6 11 18
1:30 0 0 2 2 13:30 0 20 20 40 06:00 07:00 1 33 33 67
1:45 0 1 1 2 13:45 1 32 26 59 07:00 08:00 11 143 175 329 2:00 0 3 0 3 14:00 0 27 27 54 08:00 09:00 7 93 240 340
2:15 0 0 0 0 14:15 0 41 36 77 09:00 10:00 2 54 117 173
2:30 0 0 0 0 14:30 2 34 41 77 10:00 11:00 1 71 93 165
2:45 0 0 0 0 14:45 1 52 39 92 11:00 12:00 3 78 97 178
3:00 0 0 0 0 15:00 17 42 55 114 12:00 13:00 2 132 90 224 3:15 0 0 1 1 15:15 1 42 61 104 13:00 14:00 3 101 100 204 3:30 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 44 38 82 14:00 15:00 3 154 143 300 3:45 0 0 1 1 15:45 3 59 22 84 15:00 16:00 21 187 176 384 4:00 0 1 0 1 16:00 3 61 26 90 16:00 17:00 5 194 125 324 4:15 0 1 0 1 16:15 0 50 38 88 17:00 18:00 3 191 116 310 4:30 0 0 0 0 16:30 1 43 33 77 18:00 19:00 4 140 91 235
4:45 0 0 3 3 16:45 1 40 28 69 19:00 20:00 1 83 65 149
5:00 0 1 4 5 17:00 1 46 24 71 20:00 21:00 2 54 41 97
5:15 0 3 1 4 17:15 2 54 32 88 21:00 22:00 1 59 18 78
5:30 0 1 2 3 17:30 0 44 24 68 22:00 23:00 1 23 14 38
5:45 1 1 4 6 17:45 0 47 36 83 23:00 00:00 1 15 4 20
6:00 1 2 6 9 18:00 0 43 26 69 STATISTICS
6:15 0 10 5 15 18:15 2 42 28 72 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 0 5 6 11 18:30 1 24 15 40 Peak Period 00:00 to 12:00 6:45 0 16 16 32 18:45 1 31 22 54 Volume 27 489 777 1293 7:00 0 12 20 32 19:00 0 27 18 45 Peak Hour 7:15 7:15 7:45 7:30 7:15 1 35 26 62 19:15 0 21 15 36 Peak Volume 15 163 298 455 7:30 2 49 42 93 19:30 1 21 18 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.469 0.832 0.730 0.801 7:45 8 47 87 142 19:45 0 14 14 28
8:00 4 32 102 138 20:00 0 15 8 23 Peak Period 12:00 to 00:00 8:15 1 18 63 82 20:15 1 11 12 24 Volume 47 1333 983 2363 8:30 0 19 46 65 20:30 1 18 12 31 Peak Hour 14:30 15:30 14:30 14:45 8:45 2 24 29 55 20:45 0 10 9 19 Peak Volume 21 214 196 392 9:00 1 13 29 43 21:00 0 25 4 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.309 0.877 0.803 0.860 9:15 0 14 38 52 21:15 0 11 7 18
9:30 0 21 25 46 21:30 1 12 4 17 Peak Period 07:00 to 09:00 9:45 1 6 25 32 21:45 0 11 3 14 Volume 18 236 415 669
10:00 1 24 27 52 22:00 0 6 4 10 Peak Hour 7:15 7:15 7:45 7:30 10:15 0 15 23 38 22:15 0 5 3 8 Peak Volume 15 163 298 455 10:30 0 19 25 44 22:30 1 9 4 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.469 0.832 0.730 0.801 10:45 0 13 18 31 22:45 0 3 3 6
11:00 2 14 29 45 23:00 0 2 0 2 Peak Period 16:00 to 18:00 11:15 0 22 21 43 23:15 0 4 2 6 Volume 8 385 241 634
11:30 0 18 24 42 23:30 1 8 1 10 Peak Hour 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 11:45 1 24 23 48 23:45 0 1 1 2 Peak Volume 5 194 125 324 TOTALS 27 0 489 777 1293 TOTALS 47 0 1333 983 2363 Peak Hour Factor 0.417 0.795 0.822 0.900 SPLIT % 2% 0% 38% 60% 35% SPLIT % 2% 0% 56% 42% 65%
300
250
200
150
100
50 0

NB SB EB WB
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME

DAILY TOTALS NB SB
4,751 4,415
EB
476
WB
281
Total
9,923 DAILY TOTALS
Michillinda Ave & Valley View Ave
Day: Thursday City: Sierra Madre
Date: 5/22/2025 Project #: CA25_020178_019
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME
0:00
0:15
0:30
0:45
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
6:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

NB SB EB WB
5 3 0 0
4 2 0 0
7 2 0 0
6 4 0 0
3 2 0 0
4 2 0 0
3 1 1 1
3 3 1 0
6 3 0 0
2 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 1 1 0
1 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 1 0 0
0 3 1 0
1 4 3 0
2 11 4 0
10 8 0 1
4 13 2 2
4 20 1 1
5 18 4 3
23 19 5 3
16 20 1 0
41 42 6 4
39 59 8 4
78 78 7 3
106 105 6 10
100 162 13 17
97 200 8 21
64 142 5 8
85 109 7 2
68 77 10 5
59 73 6 2
52 77 8 3
57 72 6 3
47 64 6 3
60 70 6 5
45 73 4 1
54 51 1 2
48 67 7 3
68 67 10 2
53 59 4 2
43 70 8 5
65 67 12 4
1446 1928 172 120
39% 53% 5% 3%
TOTAL
8 6
9 10
5 6
6 7
9 2
2 1
3 2
2 2
1 3
4 8
17 19
21 26
30 50
37 93
110
166
227
292
326
219
203
160
140
140
138
120
141
123
108
125
147
118
126
148
3666
37%
TIME
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

NB SB EB WB
80 69 8 4
80 63 6 2
91 53 4 8
74 65 9 3
56 49 5 4
67 68 5 5
63 57 10 3
69 55 14 5
94 67 4 2
103 83 7 7
82 98 6 3
97 70 8 5
115 129 16 6
98 148 9 5
102 86 10 10
101 75 6 6
100 81 10 2
99 93 6 8
114 81 16 5
100 76 13 6
118 70 7 5
115 81 4 2
95 69 14 5
99 84 15 4
88 60 16 6
96 48 10 9
79 56 3 4
72 44 6 3
63 38 13 5
73 42 2 1
64 35 2 1
46 42 6 1
57 34 2 3
45 30 6 1
58 30 8 3
49 31 2 3
52 19 3 0
47 24 2 0
43 13 0 1
24 12 2 2
24 13 0 1
27 8 4 1
17 12 1 1
16 7 3 0
15 3 0 0
15 6 1 0
13 5 0 0
10 5 0 0
3305 2487 304 161
53% 40% 5% 3%
TOTAL
161
151
156
151
114
145
133
143
167
200
189
180
266
260
208
188
193
206
216
195
200
202
183
202
170
163
142
125
119
118
102
95 96
82 99
85 74
73 57
40 38
40 31
26 18
22 18
15 6257
63%
TIME
00:00 01:00
01:00 02:00
02:00 03:00
03:00 04:00
04:00 05:00
05:00 06:00
06:00 07:00
07:00 08:00
08:00 09:00
09:00 10:00
10:00 11:00
11:00 12:00
12:00 13:00
13:00 14:00
14:00 15:00
15:00 16:00
16:00 17:00
17:00 18:00
18:00 19:00
19:00 20:00
20:00 21:00
21:00 22:00
22:00 23:00
23:00 00:00
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor

NB SB EB WB
22 11 0 0
13 8 2 1
11 3 0 0
3 5 1 0
4 8 4 0
20 52 7 4
85 99 16 10
323 404 34 34
314 528 30 36
215 286 26 11
207 261 18 11
229 263 34 13
325 250 27 17
255 229 34 17
376 318 25 17
416 438 41 27
413 331 45 21
427 304 40 16
335 208 35 22
246 157 23 8
209 125 18 10
166 68 7 3
84 40 8 3
53 19 1 0

STATISTICS

NB SB EB WB
00:00 to 12:00
1446 1928 172 120
7:15 7:45 7:00 7:30
381 613 34 56

0.899 0.766 0.654 0.667
12:00 to 00:00
3305 2487 304 161
16:30 14:30 17:30 15:00
447 445 55 27

0.947 0.752 0.859 0.675
07:00 to 09:00
637 932 64 70
7:15 7:45 7:00 7:30
381 613 34 56

0.899 0.766 0.654 0.667
16:00 to 18:00
840 635 85 37
16:30 16:00 16:00 16:15
447 331 45 24

0.947 0.890 0.703 0.750
TOTAL
33 24
14 9
16 83
210
795
908
538
497
539
619
535
736
922
810
787
600
434
362
244
135
73 TOTAL
3666
7:30
1064

0.816
6257
15:00
922

0.867
1703
7:30
1064

0.816
1597
16:15
817

0.946
600
500
400
300
200
100
0 NB SB EB WB
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

ATTACHMENT B
Peak Hour Turning Movement, Bike and
Pedestrian Counts
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: N Sunnyside Ave & Fairview Ave
City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-001
Control: 2-Way Stop(EB/WB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Totals
NS/EW Streets: N Sunnyside Ave N Sunnyside Ave Fairview Ave Fairview Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
1 1 0 0
0 1 2 0
3 0 1 0
2 2 1 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 1 1 0
2 2 2 0
0 5 2 0
0 2 2 1
0 3 2 0
3 8 0 0
1 6 0 0
0 7 0 0
3 7 0 0
21 20
18 23
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
4 0 1 0
1 2 3 0
1 1 3 0
1 1 2 0
0 0 4 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 2 0
0 2 1 0
2 6 1 0
0 1 0 0
1 2 0 0
3 6 0 0
2 17 1 0
0 6 0 0
2 6 0 0
1 4 0 0
38 15
18 21
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
13 8 13 0

38.24% 23.53% 38.24% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
1 12 8 0

4.76% 57.14% 38.10% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
8 27 9 1

17.78% 60.00% 20.00% 2.22%

WL WT WR WU
12 61 1 0

16.22% 82.43% 1.35% 0.00%
TOTAL
174
PEAK HR : 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
1 6 5 0

0.250 0.500 0.313 0.000
2 16 7 1

0.250 0.667 0.875 0.250
6 37 1 0

0.500 0.544 0.250 0.000

0.550
TOTAL
99 0.651
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
9 3 5 0

0.563 0.375 0.625 0.000

0.850 0.750 0.722
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
2 3 1 0
2 2 1 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 2 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 1 0
0 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
4 3 1 0
1 1 0 0
1 4 1 0
0 1 0 0
1 9 1 0
13 18
12 23
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
1 6 3 0
0 1 0 0
2 3 0 0
3 0 1 0
1 3 1 0
1 1 2 0
0 2 1 0
2 1 1 0
1 7 2 0
0 5 2 0
2 3 1 0
0 8 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 4 1 0
2 1 0 0
0 5 2 0
30 17
17 23
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
11 16 8 0

31.43% 45.71% 22.86% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
5 13 5 0

21.74% 56.52% 21.74% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
9 39 7 0

16.36% 70.91% 12.73% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
5 30 5 0

12.50% 75.00% 12.50% 0.00%
TOTAL
153
PEAK HR : 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
4 7 5 0

0.500 0.583 0.625 0.000
3 23 5 0

0.375 0.719 0.625 0.000

0.775
2 15 3 0

0.250 0.750 0.375 0.000

0.714
TOTAL
87 0.725
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
6 10 4 0

0.500 0.417 0.333 0.000

0.500 0.800
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: N Sunnyside Ave & Fairview Ave
City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-001
Control: 2-Way Stop(EB/WB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Bikes
NS/EW Streets: N Sunnyside Ave N Sunnyside Ave Fairview Ave Fairview Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0 1 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1
0 0
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
1 0 1 0

50.00% 0.00% 50.00% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU
0 0 0 0

WL WT WR WU
0 1 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
3 PEAK HR : 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 1 0 0

0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000

0.250
TOTAL
2 0.500
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
1 0 0 0

0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.250
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0
1 1
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 2
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
0 1 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
1 0 0 0
100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
0 2 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
0 2 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
6 PEAK HR : 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
1 0 0 0

0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 1 0 0

0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000

0.250
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL
3 0.375
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 1 0 0

0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000

0.250 0.250
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: N Sunnyside Ave & Fairview Ave Project ID: 25-020177-001 City: Sierra Madre Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
NS/EW Streets: N Sunnyside Ave N Sunnyside Ave Fairview Ave Fairview Ave

AM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 3
4 2
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
1 1
2 0
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
2 0
1 0
1 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 4
3 3
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
6 2

75.00% 25.00%
EB WB
2 2

50.00% 50.00%
NB SB
8 3

72.73% 27.27%
NB SB
0 1

0.00% 100.00%
TOTAL
24 PEAK HR : 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
2 0

0.500

0.500
5 2

0.625 0.250

0.583
0 1

0.250

0.250
TOTAL
13 0.813
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
2 1

0.500 0.250

0.375

PM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 1
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
1 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
2 3
0 0
2 2
9 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
2 4

33.33% 66.67%
EB WB
1 3

25.00% 75.00%
NB SB
1 0
100.00% 0.00%
NB SB
3 3

50.00% 50.00%
TOTAL
17 PEAK HR : 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
1 1

0.250 0.250

0.500
1 0

0.250

0.250
3 3

0.375 0.250

0.300
TOTAL
13 0.361
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
1 3

0.250 0.250

0.333
ID: 25-020177-001
City: Sierra Madre
N Sunnyside Ave

SOUTHBOUND
Day: Thursday
Date: 5/22/2025
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM AM 5 6 1 0 6 AM 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM PM 5 7 4 0 16 PM 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1
2 0 3 0 TEV 99
AM

0.65 0
NOON
87 PM

0.73 0 0 0 0
16 0 23 1 PHF
31 0 22
7 0 5 0 0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
Totals (AM) PM 14 0 6 10 4 PM Total Bikes (AM)
NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON
2 16
7 1
37 6
AM 19 0 9 3 5 AM

NORTHBOUND
N Sunnyside Ave
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 23
5 3
15 2
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
N Sunnyside Ave & Fairview Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
52 0 26
CONTROL 1 15 0 37
1 0 0 0 2-Way Stop(EB/WB) 0 2 0 6
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
PM 3
NOON 0
0 PM
0 NOON
Totals (PM) AM 1 2 AM Total Bikes (PM)
AM 0
NOON 0
PM 3
5 AM
0 NOON
1 PM
0 1
0 0
0 0COUNT PERIODS Fairview Ave

WESTBOUND
100
000
010
10200
1 935
000
6104
Fairview Ave PEAK HOURS
574
000
561

EASTBOUND
102103
PM PM

NOON NOON

AM AMAM AM

NOON NOONPM PM
001
000
000
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: S Sunnyside Ave & Mariposa Ave
City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-002
Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Totals
NS/EW Streets: S Sunnyside Ave S Sunnyside Ave Mariposa Ave Mariposa Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0 1 0
0 6 0 0
0 8 1 0
0 13 0 0
1 2 1 0
2 5 2 0
1 9 1 0
2 14 1 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 2 0
3 2 2 0
3 1 1 0
0 3 2 0
1 3 5 0
3 8 8 0
13 22
34 56
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 15 1 0
0 6 0 0
1 4 0 0
0 5 2 0
1 40 1 0
1 15 2 0
2 11 1 0
0 7 1 0
0 7 1 0
0 2 0 0
0 4 1 0
1 3 2 0
1 6 7 0
0 1 4 0
1 1 4 0
1 3 3 0
80 31
30 28
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
1 57 5 0

1.59% 90.48% 7.94% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
10 103 10 0

8.13% 83.74% 8.13% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
4 26 8 0

10.53% 68.42% 21.05% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
10 26 34 0

14.29% 37.14% 48.57% 0.00%
TOTAL
294
PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
5 78 5 0

0.625 0.488 0.625 0.000
3 14 5 0

0.250 0.500 0.625 0.000
5 18 24 0

0.417 0.563 0.750 0.000

0.618
TOTAL
201

0.628
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 42 2 0

0.000 0.700 0.500 0.000

0.688 0.524 0.688
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 6 3 0
1 5 2 0
0 9 0 0
0 11 0 0
4 9 2 0
0 9 3 0
3 6 3 0
2 11 1 0
1 9 0 0
1 4 2 0
3 4 1 0
2 11 0 0
1 3 2 0
0 4 2 0
3 4 0 0
1 1 1 0
40 33
36 41
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 9 1 0
0 10 2 0
0 8 1 0
0 10 1 0
1 10 0 0
3 6 0 0
1 7 1 0
2 7 2 1
0 4 1 0
2 5 1 0
0 11 0 0
2 9 0 0
1 4 2 0
0 2 0 0
1 2 4 0
1 0 0 0
33 31
36 35
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
1 68 10 0

1.27% 86.08% 12.66% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
16 65 12 1

17.02% 69.15% 12.77% 1.06%

EL ET ER EU
11 57 5 0

15.07% 78.08% 6.85% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
8 20 11 0

20.51% 51.28% 28.21% 0.00%
TOTAL
285
PEAK HR : 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
9 35 9 0

0.563 0.795 0.750 0.000
7 28 3 0

0.583 0.636 0.375 0.000

0.731
5 12 5 0

0.417 0.750 0.625 0.000

0.786
TOTAL
150

0.915
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
1 31 5 0

0.250 0.705 0.417 0.000

0.841 0.883
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: S Sunnyside Ave & Mariposa Ave
City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-002
Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Bikes
NS/EW Streets: S Sunnyside Ave S Sunnyside Ave Mariposa Ave Mariposa Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
0 0 0 0

SL ST SR SU
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU
0 0 0 0

WL WT WR WU
0 0 1 0

0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
1 PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 0 1 0

0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000

0.250
TOTAL
1 0.250
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
1 0
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
0 0 0 0

SL ST SR SU
0 1 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
0 0 0 0

WL WT WR WU
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
1 PEAK HR : 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
0 1 0 0

0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL
1 0.250
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.250
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: S Sunnyside Ave & Mariposa Ave Project ID: 25-020177-002 City: Sierra Madre Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
NS/EW Streets: S Sunnyside Ave S Sunnyside Ave Mariposa Ave Mariposa Ave

AM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
2 0
0 2
1 1
2 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 2
3 3
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
3 0
0 2
3 1
4 4
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
1 1

50.00% 50.00%
EB WB
6 5

54.55% 45.45%
NB SB
2 1

66.67% 33.33%
NB SB
3 4

42.86% 57.14%
TOTAL
23 PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
3 2

0.375 0.500

0.625
2 1

0.500 0.250

0.375
0 1

0.250

0.250
TOTAL
10 0.833
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 1

0.250

0.250

PM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 1
1 0
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
1 1
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
2 1

66.67% 33.33%
EB WB
0 0
NB SB
0 0
NB SB
2 1

66.67% 33.33%
TOTAL
6 PEAK HR : 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
0 0 0 0 1 0

0.250

0.250
TOTAL
3 0.750
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
1 1

0.250 0.250

0.500
ID: 25-020177-002
City: Sierra Madre
S Sunnyside Ave

SOUTHBOUND
Day: Thursday
Date: 5/22/2025
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM AM 5 78 5 0 69 AM 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM PM 9 35 9 0 43 PM 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 5 0 24
3 0 7 0 TEV 201
AM

0.63 0
NOON
150
PM

0.91 0 0 0 0
14 0 28 1 PHF
42 0 21
5 0 3 0 0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
Totals (AM) PM 43 0 1 31 5 PM Total Bikes (AM)
NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON
3 14
5 24
18 5
AM 88 0 0 42 2 AM

NORTHBOUND
S Sunnyside Ave
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 28
3 5
12 5
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
S Sunnyside Ave & Mariposa Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
23 0 22
CONTROL 1 12 0 18
0 0 0 0 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) 0 5 0 5
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
PM 0
NOON 0 0 PM
0 NOON
Totals (PM) AM 1 1 AM Total Bikes (PM)
AM 0
NOON 0
PM 1
2 AM
0 NOON
0 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0COUNT PERIODS Mariposa Ave

WESTBOUND
000
000
000
00320
0 0422
000
1315
Mariposa Ave PEAK HOURS
9359
000
5785

EASTBOUND
100101

PM PMNOON NOONAM AMAM AMNOON NOONPM PM
010
000
000
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Michillinda Ave & W Grand View Ave
City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-003
Control: 1-Way Stop(WB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Totals
NS/EW Streets: Michillinda Ave Michillinda Ave W Grand View Ave W Grand View Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 17 11 0
0 21 33 0
0 29 43 0
0 22 32 0
2 28 0 0
1 31 0 0
6 33 0 0
16 46 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
19 0 1 0
30 0 1 0
34 0 5 0
75 0 13 0
78 117
150
205
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 37 22 0
1 27 18 0
0 38 20 0
0 30 19 0
8 45 0 1
1 42 0 0
1 45 0 0
5 35 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
93 0 8 0
58 0 7 0
41 0 5 0
30 0 3 0
214
154
150
122
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
1 221 198 0

0.24% 52.62% 47.14% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
40 305 0 1

11.56% 88.15% 0.00% 0.29%

EL ET ER EU
0 0 1 0

0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
380 0 43 0

89.83% 0.00% 10.17% 0.00%
TOTAL
1190
PEAK HR : 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
26 178 0 1

0.406 0.967 0.000 0.250
0 0 1 0

0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000
267 0 33 0

0.718 0.000 0.635 0.000

0.743
TOTAL
723

0.845
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
1 124 92 0

0.250 0.816 0.719 0.000

0.919 0.827 0.250
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 19 52 0
0 25 42 0
0 32 37 0
0 26 36 0
3 33 0 0
10 29 0 0
5 16 0 0
5 30 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
20 0 3 0
33 0 5 0
30 0 3 0
24 0 4 0
131
144
123
125
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 28 43 1
0 27 50 0
0 25 42 0
0 26 44 0
2 33 0 0
4 30 0 0
3 28 0 0
6 20 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0
30 0 3 0
25 0 0 0
32 0 3 0
131
144
123
131
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
0 208 346 1

0.00% 37.48% 62.34% 0.18%

SL ST SR SU
38 219 0 0

14.79% 85.21% 0.00% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
0 0 1 0

0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
218 0 21 0

91.21% 0.00% 8.79% 0.00%
TOTAL
1052
PEAK HR : 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
15 111 0 0

0.625 0.841 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
111 0 6 0

0.867 0.000 0.500 0.000

0.836
TOTAL
529

0.918
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 106 179 1

0.000 0.946 0.895 0.250

0.929 0.900
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Michillinda Ave & W Grand View Ave
City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-003
Control: 1-Way Stop(WB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Bikes
NS/EW Streets: Michillinda Ave Michillinda Ave W Grand View Ave W Grand View Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
1 0 0 0
0 2
1 3
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0
0 2
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
1 0 1 0

50.00% 0.00% 50.00% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
1 1 0 0

50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
1 0 0 0
100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
2 0 2 0

50.00% 0.00% 50.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
9 PEAK HR : 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
1 1 0 0

0.250 0.250 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1 0 1 0

0.250 0.000 0.250 0.000

0.500
TOTAL
4 0.333
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.250
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 2 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 3
2 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
0 0 2 0

0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
0 0 0 1

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%

EL ET ER EU
0 0 1 0

0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
3 0 0 0
100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
7 PEAK HR : 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
0 0 0 1

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250
0 0 1 0

0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000

0.250
3 0 0 0

0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.750
TOTAL
7 0.583
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0 2 0

0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000

0.250 0.250
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Michillinda Ave & W Grand View Ave Project ID: 25-020177-003 City: Sierra Madre Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
NS/EW Streets: Michillinda Ave Michillinda Ave W Grand View Ave W Grand View Ave

AM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 2
1 1
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
0 0
EB WB
0 2

0.00% 100.00%
NB SB
2 1

66.67% 33.33%
NB SB
0 0
TOTAL
5 PEAK HR : 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
0 2

0.500

0.500
1 1

0.250 0.250

0.500
0 0
TOTAL
4 0.500
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0

PM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
0 0
EB WB
2 1

66.67% 33.33%
NB SB
0 0
NB SB
0 0
TOTAL
3 PEAK HR : 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
0 1

0.250

0.250
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
1 0.250
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0
ID: 25-020177-003
City: Sierra Madre
Michillinda Ave

SOUTHBOUND
Day: Thursday
Date: 5/22/2025
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM AM 0 178 26 1 158 AM 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM PM 0 111 15 0 112 PM 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 6 0 33
194 0 118
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
Totals (AM) PM 223 1 0 106 179 PM Total Bikes (AM)
NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON
0 0
1 33
0 267
AM 446 0 1 124 92 AM

NORTHBOUND
Michillinda Ave
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
0 111
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
Michillinda Ave & W Grand View Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
1 0 0
CONTROL 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1-Way Stop(WB) 0 111 0 267
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TEV 723 0 529

AM NOON PM
PHF 0.84 0.92
0 0 0 0
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
PM 0
NOON 0 0 PM
0 NOON
Totals (PM) AM 0 1 AM Total Bikes (PM)
AM 0
NOON 0
PM 0
1 AM
0 NOON
0 PM
0 0
1 0
0 3COUNT PERIODS
W Grand View Ave

WESTBOUND
000
000
002
00020
1 112492
000
0106179
W Grand View Ave PEAK HOURS
011115
000
017826

EASTBOUND
000000

PM PMNOON NOONAM AMAM AMNOON NOONPM PM
000
000
011
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: N Canon Ave & E Grand View Ave
City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-004
Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Totals
NS/EW Streets: N Canon Ave N Canon Ave E Grand View Ave E Grand View Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
2 1 2 0
3 2 0 0
18 4 2 0
2 1 2 0
3 1 0 0
0 4 4 0
5 1 1 0
0 5 2 0
0 9 1 0
2 15 5 0
1 37 21 0
1 21 0 0
1 29 3 0
3 60 0 0
2 74 2 0
34 52
98 168
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
36 3 5 0
11 3 3 0
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 0
3 2 1 0
2 0 2 0
5 1 2 0
1 1 5 0
0 23 20 0
1 18 5 0
2 20 0 0
3 24 3 0
5 40 1 0
0 32 2 0
3 35 2 0
3 27 0 0
139
79 73
70 TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
72 15 14 0

71.29% 14.85% 13.86% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
21 11 17 0

42.86% 22.45% 34.69% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
9 151 57 0

4.15% 69.59% 26.27% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
18 318 10 0

5.20% 91.91% 2.89% 0.00%
TOTAL
713
PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
10 7 8 0

0.500 0.438 0.500 0.000
4 93 51 0

0.500 0.628 0.607 0.000
10 206 5 0

0.500 0.696 0.625 0.000

0.708
TOTAL
484

0.720
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
68 12 10 0

0.472 0.750 0.500 0.000

0.511 0.781 0.627
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
3 1 2 0
1 2 8 0
3 1 0 0
1 2 4 0
1 4 1 0
4 0 1 0
0 2 0 0
3 2 2 0
1 49 2 0
1 32 2 0
1 34 1 1
1 32 4 0
1 18 0 0
0 23 4 0
1 21 8 0
0 21 0 0
83 78
73 72
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
2 2 0 0
0 1 4 0
1 0 1 0
1 3 1 0
3 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 2 0 0
2 3 3 0
1 37 4 0
0 31 2 0
1 31 2 0
2 26 5 0
1 20 2 0
1 18 3 0
0 26 3 0
1 20 1 0
72 61
68 68
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
12 12 20 0

27.27% 27.27% 45.45% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
15 13 7 0

42.86% 37.14% 20.00% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
8 272 22 1

2.64% 89.77% 7.26% 0.33%

WL WT WR WU
5 167 21 0

2.59% 86.53% 10.88% 0.00%
TOTAL
575
PEAK HR : 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
8 8 4 0

0.500 0.500 0.500 0.000
4 147 9 1

1.000 0.750 0.563 0.250

0.774
2 83 12 0

0.500 0.902 0.375 0.000

0.808
TOTAL
306

0.922
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
8 6 14 0

0.667 0.750 0.438 0.000

0.636 0.714
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: N Canon Ave & E Grand View Ave
City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-004
Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Bikes
NS/EW Streets: N Canon Ave N Canon Ave E Grand View Ave E Grand View Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2
2 2
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0
2 1
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
0 1 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
0 1 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
0 4 1 0

0.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
0 4 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
11 PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0 1 0 0

0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000
0 2 1 0

0.000 0.500 0.250 0.000
0 2 0 0

0.000 0.500 0.000 0.000

0.500
TOTAL
6 0.750
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.250 0.750
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1
0 2
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
1 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 3
2 5
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
3 0 1 0

75.00% 0.00% 25.00% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
4 0 0 0
100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
0 6 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
0 1 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
15 PEAK HR : 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
1 0 0 0

0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 1 0 0

0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000

0.250
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL
3 0.375
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
1 0 0 0

0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.250 0.250
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: N Canon Ave & E Grand View Ave Project ID: 25-020177-004 City: Sierra Madre Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
NS/EW Streets: N Canon Ave N Canon Ave E Grand View Ave E Grand View Ave

AM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 0
1 0
0 2
2 0
1 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
4 5
3 5
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 2
3 0
0 2
0 0
3 0
2 0
0 0
2 0
1 4
0 0
2 1
4 0
0 0
1 2
0 0
2 0
10 8
5 8
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
5 6

45.45% 54.55%
EB WB
8 3

72.73% 27.27%
NB SB
10 10

50.00% 50.00%
NB SB
3 3

50.00% 50.00%
TOTAL
48 PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
6 0

0.500

0.500
2 7

0.500 0.438

0.450
1 3

0.250 0.375

0.333
TOTAL
26 0.650
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
3 4

0.250 0.500

0.583

PM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 1
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
2 2
4 5
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
3 0
100.00% 0.00%
EB WB
2 3

40.00% 60.00%
NB SB
1 3

25.00% 75.00%
NB SB
3 0
100.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
15 PEAK HR : 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
0 1

0.250

0.250
0 0 1 0

0.250

0.250
TOTAL
2 0.500
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0
ID: 25-020177-004
City: Sierra Madre
N Canon Ave

SOUTHBOUND
Day: Thursday
Date: 5/22/2025
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM AM 8 7 10 0 21 AM 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM PM 4 8 8 0 22 PM 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 12 0 5
169 0 113
51 0 9 0 0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
Totals (AM) PM 19 0 8 6 14 PM Total Bikes (AM)
NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON
4 93
51 5
206
10 AM 68 0 68 12 10 AM

NORTHBOUND
N Canon Ave
0 2
1 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 147
9 12
83 2
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
N Canon Ave & E Grand View Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
282 0 96
CONTROL 1 83 0 206
0 0 1 0 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) 0 2 0 10
4 93
0 0
4 147
0 1
TEV 484 0 306

AM NOON PM
PHF 0.72 0.92
0 0 0 0
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
PM 0
NOON 0 0 PM
0 NOON
Totals (PM) AM 3 7 AM Total Bikes (PM)
AM 1
NOON 0
PM 1
2 AM
0 NOON
0 PM
0 1
0 0
0 0COUNT PERIODS E Grand View Ave

WESTBOUND
000
000
100
00600
1 681210
000
86 14
E Grand View Ave PEAK HOURS
488
000
87 10

EASTBOUND
003400

PM PMNOON NOONAM AMAM AMNOON NOONPM PM
001
000
010
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Wilson St & W Grand View Ave
City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-005
Control: 1-Way Stop(NB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Totals
NS/EW Streets: Wilson St Wilson St W Grand View Ave W Grand View Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 0 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
4 0 4 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 12 0 0
0 34 1 0
0 44 5 0
0 41 6 0
1 19 0 0
0 26 0 0
2 40 0 0
5 82 0 0
32 62
93 142
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0 4 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 26 6 0
0 14 4 0
0 18 1 0
0 21 2 1
3 99 0 0
0 63 0 0
0 46 0 0
0 29 0 0
138
82 65
55 TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
9 0 9 0

50.00% 0.00% 50.00% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU
0 210 25 1

0.00% 88.98% 10.59% 0.42%

WL WT WR WU
11 404 0 0

2.65% 97.35% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
669
PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 125 21 0

0.000 0.710 0.875 0.000
10 284 0 0

0.500 0.717 0.000 0.000

0.721
TOTAL
455

0.801
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
7 0 8 0

0.438 0.000 0.500 0.000

0.469 0.745
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 0 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0 3 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 60 1 0
0 47 2 1
0 42 1 0
0 39 1 0
0 26 0 0
0 38 0 0
0 33 0 0
0 28 0 0
90 88
77 69
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
1 0 0 0
0 0 2 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 46 0 0
0 54 0 0
0 44 0 0
0 47 0 0
0 24 0 0
0 32 0 0
0 24 0 0
1 35 0 0
71 88
68 83
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
1 0 7 0

12.50% 0.00% 87.50% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU
0 379 5 1

0.00% 98.44% 1.30% 0.26%

WL WT WR WU
1 240 0 0

0.41% 99.59% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
634
PEAK HR : 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 188 5 1

0.000 0.783 0.625 0.250

0.795
0 125 0 0

0.000 0.822 0.000 0.000

0.822
TOTAL
324

0.900
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0 5 0

0.000 0.000 0.417 0.000

0.417
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Wilson St & W Grand View Ave
City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-005
Control: 1-Way Stop(NB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Bikes
NS/EW Streets: Wilson St Wilson St W Grand View Ave W Grand View Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 0 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0
1 2
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
0 0 0 0

SL ST SR SU
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU
0 1 1 0

0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
0 3 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
5 PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 1 1 0

0.000 0.250 0.250 0.000
0 3 0 0

0.000 0.750 0.000 0.000

0.750
TOTAL
5 0.625
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.500
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 0 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 3
1 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
0 0 0 0

SL ST SR SU
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU
0 2 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
0 3 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
5 PEAK HR : 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0
PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Wilson St & W Grand View Ave Project ID: 25-020177-005 City: Sierra Madre Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
NS/EW Streets: Wilson St Wilson St W Grand View Ave W Grand View Ave

AM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 3
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
4 1
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 5
1 5
4 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 5
6 5
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
0 0
EB WB
7 19

26.92% 73.08%
NB SB
0 0
NB SB
0 0
TOTAL
26 PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
2 12

0.500 0.600

0.700
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
14 0.700
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0

PM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 1
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
1 0
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
1 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
3 2
1 1
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
0 0
EB WB
4 4

50.00% 50.00%
NB SB
0 2

0.00% 100.00%
NB SB
1 1

50.00% 50.00%
TOTAL
12 PEAK HR : 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
1 2

0.250 0.500

0.375
0 2

0.250

0.250
0 0
TOTAL
5 0.625
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 0
ID: 25-020177-005
City: Sierra Madre
Wilson St

SOUTHBOUND
Day: Thursday
Date: 5/22/2025
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM AM 0 0 0 0 0 AM 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM PM 0 0 0 0 0 PM 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
193 0 133
21 0 5 0 0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
Totals (AM) PM 5 0 0 0 5 PM Total Bikes (AM)
NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON
0 125
21 0
284
10 AM 31 0 7 0 8 AM

NORTHBOUND
Wilson St
0 1
1 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 188
5 0
125
0 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
Wilson St & W Grand View Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
291 0 126
CONTROL 1 125 0 284
0 0 1 0 1-Way Stop(NB) 0 0 0 10
0 125
0 0
0 188
0 1
TEV 455 0 324

AM NOON PM
PHF 0.80 0.90
0 0 0 0
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
PM 0
NOON 0 2 PM
0 NOON
Totals (PM) AM 0 0 AM Total Bikes (PM)
AM 0
NOON 0
PM 0
0 AM
0 NOON
0 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0COUNT PERIODS
W Grand View Ave

WESTBOUND
000
000
000
10 2 120
2 708
000
005
W Grand View Ave PEAK HOURS
000
000
000

EASTBOUND
000000

PM PMNOON NOONAM AMAM AMNOON NOONPM PM
000
000
000
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Michillinda Ave & Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-006
Control: 2-Way Stop(EB/WB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Totals
NS/EW Streets: Michillinda Ave Michillinda Ave Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
5 32 2 0
6 70 2 0
2 100 4 0
7 84 9 0
0 58 1 0
0 78 0 0
0 105 0 0
1 161 0 0
0 0 8 0
0 0 7 0
0 1 4 1
1 1 11 0
3 1 0 0
3 0 0 0
8 0 2 0
12 0 5 0
110
166
227
292
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
11 76 6 4
10 52 2 0
14 68 3 0
10 53 5 0
3 190 7 0
1 139 2 0
1 107 1 0
1 76 0 0
1 0 7 0
0 1 4 0
0 0 7 0
1 0 9 0
14 3 4 0
8 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
3 1 1 0
326
219
203
160
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
65 535 33 4

10.20% 83.99% 5.18% 0.63%

SL ST SR SU
7 914 11 0

0.75% 98.07% 1.18% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
3 3 57 1

4.69% 4.69% 89.06% 1.56%

WL WT WR WU
53 5 12 0

75.71% 7.14% 17.14% 0.00%
TOTAL
1703
PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
5 595 9 0

0.417 0.783 0.321 0.000
2 3 26 1

0.500 0.750 0.591 0.250
42 3 11 0

0.750 0.250 0.550 0.000

0.667
TOTAL
1064

0.816
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
30 312 21 4

0.682 0.780 0.583 0.250

0.866 0.761 0.615
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5 88 7 0
9 85 5 0
21 81 11 1
11 79 10 0
0 80 1 0
0 90 3 0
1 78 2 0
3 69 4 0
0 0 10 0
0 0 6 0
3 2 11 0
0 3 10 0
0 1 1 0
6 2 0 0
4 1 0 0
4 1 1 0
193
206
216
195
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
8 101 9 0
6 104 5 0
10 81 4 0
17 76 6 0
0 70 0 0
1 80 0 0
0 67 2 0
2 78 4 0
0 0 7 0
0 1 3 0
1 2 11 0
1 1 13 0
5 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
4 1 0 0
2 1 1 0
200
202
183
202
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
87 695 57 1

10.36% 82.74% 6.79% 0.12%

SL ST SR SU
7 612 16 0

1.10% 96.38% 2.52% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
5 9 71 0

5.88% 10.59% 83.53% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
27 7 3 0

72.97% 18.92% 8.11% 0.00%
TOTAL
1597
PEAK HR : 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM
4 307 9 0

0.333 0.853 0.563 0.000
3 5 34 0

0.250 0.417 0.773 0.000

0.656
19 4 1 0

0.792 0.500 0.250 0.000

0.750
TOTAL
817

0.946
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
49 346 35 1

0.583 0.856 0.795 0.250

0.913 0.860
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Michillinda Ave & Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave City: Sierra Madre Project ID: 25-020177-006
Control: 2-Way Stop(EB/WB) Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Bikes
NS/EW Streets: Michillinda Ave Michillinda Ave Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave AM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 2
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
0 2 0 0

0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
0 0 0 0

EL ET ER EU
0 0 0 0

WL WT WR WU
1 0 0 0
100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
3 PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1 0 0 0

0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.250
TOTAL
3 0.375
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
0 2 0 0

0.000 0.500 0.000 0.000

0.500
PM

NORTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU

SOUTHBOUND
0 1 0 0

SL ST SR SU

EASTBOUND
0 1 0 0

EL ET ER EU

WESTBOUND
0 1 0 0

WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2
1 1
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 3
2 1
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

NL NT NR NU
1 2 0 0

33.33% 66.67% 0.00% 0.00%

SL ST SR SU
4 1 0 0

80.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00%

EL ET ER EU
1 1 0 0

50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00%

WL WT WR WU
1 1 0 0

50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL
12 PEAK HR : 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM
2 0 0 0

0.500 0.000 0.000 0.000
1 1 0 0

0.250 0.250 0.000 0.000

0.500
1 0 0 0

0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.250
TOTAL
6 0.750
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
1 0 0 0

0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.250 0.500
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Michillinda Ave & Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave Project ID: 25-020177-006 City: Sierra Madre Date: 5/22/2025
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
NS/EW Streets: Michillinda Ave Michillinda Ave Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave
Valley View Ave/W
Montecito Ave

AM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 0
2 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 2
1 0
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 5
4 1
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 1
1 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 1
4 1
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
1 4
3 7
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
5 3

62.50% 37.50%
EB WB
0 0
NB SB
5 9

35.71% 64.29%
NB SB
2 2

50.00% 50.00%
TOTAL
26 PEAK HR : 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0 0 1 5

0.250 0.417

0.500
0 0
TOTAL
10 0.625
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
2 2

0.500 0.500

0.500

PM NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0 0
0 0
2 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 2
1 2
0 0
0 1
3 0
0 1
0 3
9 4
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 2
0 0
1 2
3 0
0 0
1 0
1 1
5 2
1 8
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH %'s :

EB WB
4 3

57.14% 42.86%
EB WB
0 0
NB SB
2 12

14.29% 85.71%
NB SB
8 3

72.73% 27.27%
TOTAL
32 PEAK HR : 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM
0 0 1 8

0.250 1.000

0.750
6 2

0.500 0.500

0.667
TOTAL
21 0.583
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
2 2

0.250 0.250

0.250
ID: 25-020177-006
City: Sierra Madre
Michillinda Ave

SOUTHBOUND
Day: Thursday
Date: 5/22/2025
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM AM 9 595 5 0 325 AM 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM PM 9 307 4 0 350 PM 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 11
2 0 3 0 TEV 1064 0 817
PM

0.95 0 0 0 0
3 0 5 1 PHF

AM NOON

0.82 44 0 29
26 0 34 0 0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
Totals (AM) PM 361 1 49 346 35 PM Total Bikes (AM)
NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON
2 3
26 11
3 42
AM 667 4 30 312 21 AM

NORTHBOUND
Michillinda Ave
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 5
34 1
4 19
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
Michillinda Ave & Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
43 0 62
CONTROL 1 4 0 3
1 0 0 0 2-Way Stop(EB/WB) 0 19 0 42
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
PM 2
NOON 0
8 PM
0 NOON
Totals (PM) AM 0 5 AM Total Bikes (PM)
AM 0
NOON 0
PM 6
1 AM
0 NOON
1 PM
1 1
0 0
0 1COUNT PERIODS Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave

WESTBOUND
020
000
100
00000
0 3031221
000
4934635
Valley View Ave/W Montecito Ave PEAK HOURS
93074
000
95955

EASTBOUND
202202
PM PM

NOON NOON

AM AMAM AM

NOON NOONPM PM
002
000
000

ATTACHMENT C
All-Way Stop Warrant Sheets
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
City of Sierra Madre

MULTI-WAY STOP SIGN WORKSHEET
Prepared by Willdan Engineering
MAJOR STREET: Fairview Avenue 85TH SPEED:

OTHER MULTI-WAY STOP CONDITIONS
A. Need to control left turn conflicts

WARRANTED
B. Need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at high ped locations C. Visibility obstruction after stopping on minor street approach D. Two similar neighborhood collector streets that would improve operation YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
MINOR STREET: Sunnyside Avenue DATE: 7/10/2025
NO
If traffic signals are justified, stop signs can be installed as an interim measure.

NO
Are there five or more reported collisions within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign? No reported collisions in a 12-month period.

NO
If the 85th percentile speed of the major street exceeds 40 MPH, use 70% volume.

Street
Min
Volume 70% 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 11 AM 12 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM
Major 300 210 168 31 58 61 50 46 50 49 44 51
Minor 200 140 118 51 24 31 25 33 42 36 22 36
And, does the minor street have an average delay of at least 30 seconds in the peak hour? NO
Are there four or more reported accidents within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign, and
Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the peak hour? Peak Average Delay NOT EVALUATED
CRITERIA A – Interim Measure WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA B - COLLISION RECORD WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA C - TRAFFIC VOLUMES WARRANTED YES
CRITERIA D - 80% COMBINATION WARRANTED YES
City of Sierra Madre

MULTI-WAY STOP SIGN WORKSHEET
Prepared by Willdan Engineering
MAJOR STREET: S. Sunnyside Avenue 85TH SPEED:

OTHER MULTI-WAY STOP CONDITIONS
A. Need to control left turn conflicts

WARRANTED YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
B. Need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at high ped locations C. Visibility obstruction after stopping on minor street approach D. Two similar neighborhood collector streets that would improve operation MINOR STREET: Mariposa Avenue DATE: 7/10/2025
NO
If traffic signals are justified, stop signs can be installed as an interim measure.

NO
Are there five or more reported collisions within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign? No reported collisions in a 12-month period.

NO
If the 85th percentile speed of the major street exceeds 40 MPH, use 70% volume.

Street
Min
Volume 70% 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 11 AM 12 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM
Major 300 210 168 91 70 116 74 93 79 119 90 83
Minor 200 140 118 54 55 53 42 45 60 63 60 52
And, does the minor street have an average delay of at least 30 seconds in the peak hour? NO
Are there four or more reported accidents within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign, and
Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the peak hour? Peak Average Delay NOT EVALUATED
CRITERIA A – Interim Measure WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA B - COLLISION RECORD WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA C - TRAFFIC VOLUMES WARRANTED YES
CRITERIA D - 80% COMBINATION WARRANTED YES
City of Sierra Madre

MULTI-WAY STOP SIGN WORKSHEET
Prepared by Willdan Engineering
MAJOR STREET: Michillinda Avenue 85TH SPEED:

OTHER MULTI-WAY STOP CONDITIONS
A. Need to control left turn conflicts

WARRANTED YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
B. Need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at high ped locations C. Visibility obstruction after stopping on minor street approach D. Two similar neighborhood collector streets that would improve operation MINOR STREET: W. Grand View Avenue DATE: 7/10/2025
NO
If traffic signals are justified, stop signs can be installed as an interim measure.

NO
Are there five or more reported collisions within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign? No reported collisions in a 12-month period.

NO
If the 85th percentile speed of the major street exceeds 40 MPH, use 70% volume.

Street
Min
Volume 70% 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 12 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM
Major 300 210 168 394 371 395 387 412 460 400 412 311
Minor 200 140 118 145 178 245 87 140 179 122 117 90
And, does the minor street have an average delay of at least 30 seconds in the peak hour? NO
Are there four or more reported accidents within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign, and
Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the peak hour? Peak Average Delay NOT EVALUATED
CRITERIA A – Interim Measure WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA B - COLLISION RECORD WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA C - TRAFFIC VOLUMES WARRANTED YES
CRITERIA D - 80% COMBINATION WARRANTED YES
City of Sierra Madre

MULTI-WAY STOP SIGN WORKSHEET
Prepared by Willdan Engineering
MAJOR STREET: E. Grand View Avenue 85TH SPEED:

OTHER MULTI-WAY STOP CONDITIONS
A. Need to control left turn conflicts

WARRANTED YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
B. Need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at high ped locations C. Visibility obstruction after stopping on minor street approach D. Two similar neighborhood collector streets that would improve operation MINOR STREET: N. Canon Avenue DATE: 7/10/2025
NO
If traffic signals are justified, stop signs can be installed as an interim measure.

NO
Are there five or more reported collisions within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign? There was a single reported collision in a 12-month period.

NO
If the 85th percentile speed of the major street exceeds 40 MPH, use 70% volume.

Street
Min
Volume 70% 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM
Major 300 210 168 255 294 269 229 240 303 258 238 212
Minor 200 140 118 53 58 92 31 36 34 96 48 31
And, does the minor street have an average delay of at least 30 seconds in the peak hour? NO
Are there four or more reported accidents within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign, and
Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the peak hour? Peak Average Delay NOT EVALUATED
CRITERIA A – Interim Measure WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA B - COLLISION RECORD WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA C - TRAFFIC VOLUMES WARRANTED YES
CRITERIA D - 80% COMBINATION WARRANTED YES
City of Sierra Madre

MULTI-WAY STOP SIGN WORKSHEET
Prepared by Willdan Engineering
MAJOR STREET: W. Grand View Avenue 85TH SPEED:

OTHER MULTI-WAY STOP CONDITIONS
A. Need to control left turn conflicts

WARRANTED YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
B. Need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at high ped locations C. Visibility obstruction after stopping on minor street approach D. Two similar neighborhood collector streets that would improve operation MINOR STREET: Wilson Street DATE: 7/10/2025
NO
If traffic signals are justified, stop signs can be installed as an interim measure.

NO
Are there five or more reported collisions within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign? There were no reported collision in a 12-month period.

NO
If the 85th percentile speed of the major street exceeds 40 MPH, use 70% volume.

Street
Min
Volume 70% 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM
Major 300 210 168 299 318 333 222 297 363 319 307 231
Minor 200 140 118 7 11 7 2 3 21 5 3 4
And, does the minor street have an average delay of at least 30 seconds in the peak hour? NO
Are there four or more reported accidents within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign, and
Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the peak hour? Peak Average Delay NOT EVALUATED
CRITERIA A – Interim Measure WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA B - COLLISION RECORD WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA C - TRAFFIC VOLUMES WARRANTED YES
CRITERIA D - 80% COMBINATION WARRANTED YES
City of Sierra Madre

MULTI-WAY STOP SIGN WORKSHEET
Prepared by Willdan Engineering
MAJOR STREET: Michillinda Avenue 85TH SPEED:

OTHER MULTI-WAY STOP CONDITIONS
A. Need to control left turn conflicts

WARRANTED
B. Need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at high ped locations C. Visibility obstruction after stopping on minor street approach D. Two similar neighborhood collector streets that would improve operation YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
MINOR STREET: Valley View Street/Montecito Avenue DATE: 7/10/2025 NO
If traffic signals are justified, stop signs can be installed as an interim measure.

NO
Are there five or more reported collisions within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign? There were no reported collision in a 12-month period.

NO
If the 85th percentile speed of the major street exceeds 40 MPH, use 70% volume.

Street
Min
Volume 70% 80% Avg. Hour / Volume
7 AM 8 AM 12 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM
Major 300 210 168 714 727 842 575 694 854 744 731 543
Minor 200 140 118 58 68 66 44 42 68 66 56 57
And, does the minor street have an average delay of at least 30 seconds in the peak hour? NO
Are there four or more reported accidents within a 12-month period of a type correctable by a multi-way stop sign, and
Average major and minor street volumes are at least 80% of the minimum values, and Minor street has an average delay of at least 24 seconds in the peak hour? Peak Average Delay NOT EVALUATED
CRITERIA A – Interim Measure WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA B - COLLISION RECORD WARRANTED YES

CRITERIA C - TRAFFIC VOLUMES WARRANTED YES
CRITERIA D - 80% COMBINATION WARRANTED YES

ATTACHMENT D
Parking Occupancy Survey
Sierra Madre Traffic Study
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
Parking Study
Project ID: 25-020179 Date: 5/28/2025
City: Sierra Madre, CA Day: Wednesday
Number of spaces provided for " Unmarked " segments are only approximate. Occupancy may exceed inventory.

Segment Street From To Curb Type
Side of
the Street Marked/Unmarked Restriction Measurement (ft.)/# of Spaces (if Marked) Space 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 001 W Grand View Ave Michillinda Ave Wilson St Regular S Unmarked No Parking on City Streets 2am-5am 563' 28 0 0 0 0 0 1 002 W Grand View Ave Wilson St Jameson Ct Regular S Unmarked No Restriction 774' 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 003 W Grand View Ave Jameson Ct N Lima St Regular S Unmarked No Restriction 452' 23 0 1 0 2 3 2 004 W Grand View Ave N Lima St Auburn Ave Regular S Unmarked No Restriction 1060' 53 1 1 3 1 2 0 005 W Grand View Ave Auburn Ave N Baldwin Ave Regular S Unmarked No Restriction 501' 25 4 6 4 7 8 7 006 W Grand View Ave N Baldwin Ave Auburn Ave Regular N Unmarked No Restriction 461' 23 3 4 2 3 3 3 007 W Grand View Ave Auburn Ave N Lima St Regular N Unmarked No Restriction 1052' 53 2 4 7 7 5 6 007 W Grand View Ave Auburn Ave N Lima St Regular N Unmarked Illegal - 0 0 0 0 0 0 008 W Grand View Ave N Lima St Sunnyside Ave Regular N Unmarked No Restriction 995' 50 1 3 3 3 1 0 009 W Grand View Ave Sunnyside Ave Michillinda Ave Regular N Unmarked No Restriction 728' 36 1 1 0 2 2 3 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
Parking Study
Project ID: 25-020179 Date: 5/31/2025
City: Sierra Madre, CA Day: Saturday
Number of spaces provided for " Unmarked " segments are only approximate. Occupancy may exceed inventory.

Segment Street From To Curb Type
Side of
the Street Marked/Unmarked Restriction Measurement (ft.)/# of Spaces (if Marked) Space 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 001 W Grand View Ave Michillinda Ave Wilson St Regular S Unmarked No Parking on City Streets 2am-5am 563' 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 002 W Grand View Ave Wilson St Jameson Ct Regular S Unmarked No Restriction 774' 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 003 W Grand View Ave Jameson Ct N Lima St Regular S Unmarked No Restriction 452' 23 0 0 1 0 0 0 004 W Grand View Ave N Lima St Auburn Ave Regular S Unmarked No Restriction 1060' 53 3 3 3 3 3 3 005 W Grand View Ave Auburn Ave N Baldwin Ave Regular S Unmarked No Restriction 501' 25 5 5 5 5 5 5 006 W Grand View Ave N Baldwin Ave Auburn Ave Regular N Unmarked No Restriction 461' 23 3 3 3 3 3 3 007 W Grand View Ave Auburn Ave N Lima St Regular N Unmarked No Restriction 1052' 53 3 3 3 3 3 3 007 W Grand View Ave Auburn Ave N Lima St Regular N Unmarked Illegal - 0 1 1 0 0 0 008 W Grand View Ave N Lima St Sunnyside Ave Regular N Unmarked No Restriction 995' 50 1 1 1 1 1 1 009 W Grand View Ave Sunnyside Ave Michillinda Ave Regular N Unmarked No Restriction 728' 36 5 5 5 6 3 2 Note: Segment-007 - 1:00pm-2:00pm - There was a vehicle illegally parked in a driveway.

CITY OF

SIERRA MADRE STAFF REPORT

PLANNING & COMMUNITY PRESERVATION
DATE: March 24, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clare Lin, Planning Director
By: Katelyn Huang, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Reports

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the 2025 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Reports and direct staff to submit the reports to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovaiton (LCI) in accordance with Government Code Seciton 65400.

SUMMARY
The City of Sierra Madre is providing an annual report to HCD and LCI on the status and progress made in implemenitng the General Plan (GP) and Housing Element (HE) with focus on the progress made toward meeitng Sierra Madre’s Regional Housing Needs Allocaiton (RHNA). RHNA is the state-mandated process that sets the number of housing units that must be included, at all affordability levels, in each local jurisdiciton’s housing element.

Provided in Attachment 1 is the General Plan 2025 Annual Progress Report and in Attachment 2 is the Housing Element 2025 Annual Progress Report.

On March 19, 2026, under Resoluiton No. 26‑04, the Planning Commission reviewed the 2025 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Reports, authorizing staff to submit them to LCI and HCD.

DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
General Plan Annual Progress Report
Government Code Seciton 65400 subdivision (a)(1) requires the City to prepare an annual report on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementaiton and submit it to the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovaiton (LCI) by April 1 of each year.

The General Plan Annual Progress Reoirt provides for the annual review of the General Plan to assess the level of implementaiton and effecitveness of the General Plan as a guide for orderly growth and development, preservaiton and conservaiton of open space land and natural resources, and the efficient expenditure of public funds. The General Plan Annual Progress Report also provides informaiton regarding the City’s progress in meeitng its share of regional housing needs.

The General Plan is the City’s official policy that guides decisions affecitng future physical development and change within the City. The General Plan was adopted on July 14, 2015. Each element of the General Plan sets forth implementaiton acitons and programs that are intended to carry out a policy and achieve specific objecitves. The General Plan implementaiton acitons and programs provided the basis from which to document the General Plan’s progress. The format and the content of the annual progress report were prepared in accordance with the State’s submittal requirements under the California Government Code Seciton 65400 subdivision (a)(1). The 2025 progress report is organized into three secitons with six appendices and is available online at: sierramadreca.gov/GeneralPlan. A summary of the progress report is provided below:

Seciton 1 Introduciton: This seciton summarizes the purpose and the content of the General Plan, lists important dates, and idenitfies the locaiton of the implementaiton acitons and programs. The introduciton also provides an overview of the General Plan Guidelines, as provided by the LCI, and the degree to which the City’s General Plan complies with LCI.

Seciton 2 General Plan Amendment Status: This seciton reviews the content and status of General Plan Amendments in 2025.

Seciton 3 General Plan Implementaiton Progress: This seciton idenitfies the progress the City has made toward implemenitng the acitons and programs of the General Plan during the reporitng period. Each implementaiton aciton or program is presented in its enitrety, followed by a summary of the related acitvity that occurred.

Appendices: Appendix A) General Plan Goals and Implementaiton acitons; Appendix B) Copy of 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Table submitted to HCD; Appendix C) Presentaiton from the State of the City Address; Appendix D) Annual City Budget report Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and Appendix E) City of Sierra Madre’s Housing Element Compliance Letter from HCD dated August 1, 2022.

Housing Element Annual Progress Report
Pursuant to Government Code Seciton 65400, local governments must provide by April 1 of each year the annual report for the previous calendar year to the legislaitve bodies, the HCD and LCI.

Progress in Meeitng Regional Housing Need Allocaiton
The City of Sierra Madre’s 2021-2029 Housing Element was adopted by City Council on June 6, 2022 and accepted by HCD in full compliance with State Housing Element Law on August 10, 2022. The Housing Element is required to demonstrate an ability to accommodate the RHNA reported in the housing element at the various income levels through vacant or underuitlized land designated to allow residenital development and housing produciton.

The Annual Progress Report is an important tool to facilitate implementaiton of a community’s housing element and in tracking and monitoring progress in addressing housing needs and goals. The Anuall Progress Report includes informaiton on the City’s progress in addressing the regional housing need allocaiton, including the number of housing units permitted by income level, the status of programs in the housing element and efforts to remove governmental constraints.

The RHNA Progress Report – Net units issued with enittlement, building permit, and final construciton by Affordability is provided in Attachment 2 of this report. Ciites that are able to saitsfy their enitre RHNA allocaiton for all income categories are no longer subject to certain State housing laws, including Senate Bill No. 35 and poritons of the Housing Accountability Act.

Ciites and counites with a compliant housing element and up-to-date submissions of APRs gain access to SB 2 Building Homes and Jobs Act funds.

Reporitng requirements have updated with the passage of recent legislaiton (Statutes of 2017: AB 879 and SB 35; Statutes of 2022: SB 6 and AB 2011; Statutes of 2023: SB 423). The report must now indicate whether housing development applicaitons were subject to streamlining pursuant to any statutes.

It is recommended that the City Council accept, receive and file the GP and HE APR and direct staff to file these 2025 APRs with HCD and LCI.

STRATEGIC PLAN RELATIONSHIP
This annual report is not directly correlated to the goals and objecitves in the Strategic Plan, as it fulfills an annual reporitng requirement.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed aciton does not consittute as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), based on Seciton 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as it can be determined with certainty that it will have no impact on the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact related to the preparaiton of the annual report and submission to the California Department of Housing and Community Development. Staff itme was incurred in the preparaiton of the report, whch was being fully budgeted for within the annual budget process.

Approved by:
___________________________
Michael Bruckner
City Manager
Attachments

1. 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report

2. 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Report

3. Planning Commission Resolution 26-04

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE

GENERAL PLAN

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
2025

Prepared by:

City of Sierra Madre
Planning and Community Preservation Department
232 West Sierra Madre Boulevard
Sierra Madre, CA 91024
Contact: Clare Lin, Director of Planning and Community Preservation Joshua Wolf, Senior Planner
Katelyn Huang, Assistant Planner
Sierra Madre 2025 General Plan Progress Report
This page is intentionally left blank.

Sierra Madre 2025 General Plan Progress Report
Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................1

2.0 General Plan Amendment Status ...........................................................................................2

3.0 General Plan Implementation Progress ..................................................................................3

3.1 Housing Element...............................................................................................................3

3.2 Grants ...............................................................................................................................3

3.3 Regional Housing Needs Status .......................................................................................4 Appendices
Appendix A General Plan Goals and Implementation Actions Appendix B Department of Housing and Community Development Annual Housing Element Progress Tables
Appendix C State of the City Address 2025
Appendix D Annual City Budget Fiscal Year 2025-2026
Appendix E City of Sierra Madre’s Housing Element Compliance letter dated August 10, 2022 Sierra Madre 2025 General Plan Progress Report
This page is intentionally left blank.

Sierra Madre 2025 General Plan Progress Report
Page | 1

1.0 Introduction
Government Code Section 65400 and 65700 mandate the City to prepare an annual report on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR), and the Housing and Community Development (HCD) by April 1 of each year.

The General Plan Progress Report provides for the annual review of the General Plan to assess the level of implementation and effectiveness of the General Plan as a guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources, and the efficient expenditure of public funds. The General Plan Progress Report also provides information regarding the City’s progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs.

The General Plan is the City’s official policy that guides decisions affecting future physical development and change within the City. The General Plan was adopted on July 14, 2015, contains the seven State-required Elements as follows: Circulation Element, Conservation Element, Housing Element, Land Use Element, Noise Element, Open Space Element, Safety and Seismic Safety Element.

Each Element of the General Plan, except the Housing Element, concludes with a set of implementation actions and programs that are intended to carry out a policy and achieve specific objectives. The Housing Element combines sub-policies with implementation actions. The General Plan implementation actions and programs provide the basis from which to document General Plan progress. A list of Implementation Actions and Programs are provided in Appendix A of this report.

This General Plan Progress Report summarizes the General Plan implementation progress for 2025. Section 2.0 includes the status of General Plan Amendments. Section 3.0 presents a review of the implementation actions, by General Plan Element. The regional housing needs status update is provided under the Housing Element review in Section 3.3 of this report.

The General Plan was not amended in 2025. Consistent with Government Code Section 65400(a)(2), this General Plan Progress Report must be presented to the City Council for its review and acceptance on a regular meeting agenda.

Sierra Madre 2025 General Plan Progress Report
Page | 2

2.0 General Plan Amendment Status
Local governments are required to keep their General Plans current and internally consistent.

Although General Plans must be kept current, there is no specific requirement that a local government update its General Plan on a particular timeline, with the exception of the Housing Element, which is formally required to be updated every eight years, the Open Space Element, which must be updated by January 1, 2026, per Government Code 65565.5 (Senate Bill No. 1425), the Circulation Element, which must be updated by January 1, 2028, per subdivision (e) of Government Code 65098.1 (Assembly Bill No. 98), and the Conservation Element, which must be updated alongside any other General Plan element updated on or after January 1, 2028, per Government Code section 65302 (Assembly Bill No. 1889). The procedures for the initiation of processing of requests for a General Plan amendment can be referred to the City Council for initiation at a public hearing prior to processing. Once initiated, the General Plan Amendment and related environmental document are considered by the Planning Commission and a recommendation is made to the City Council through resolution. The City Council takes final action at a public hearing.

2.1 Open Space and Conservation Elements
In September of 2025, the City commenced an update to the Open Space Element and Conservation Element of its General Plan, as required by Government Code section 65565.5 and subdivision 65302(d).

The Open Space Element is being updated to address the following:
• Access to open space for all residents in a manner that considers social, economic, and racial equity.
• Climate resilience and other cobenefits of open space, correlated with the safety element. • Rewilding opportunities, correlated with the land use element.

The Conservation Element is being updated to accomplish the following:
• Identify and analyze connectivity areas, permeability, and natural landscape areas within Sierra Madre.
• Identify and analyze existing or planned wildlife passage features, including, but not limited to, wildlife passage features included in the inventory of connectivity needs on the state highway system to ensure that planned development does not undermine the effectiveness of existing and potential wildlife passage features. • Consider the impacts of development and the barriers caused by development to wildlife and habitat connectivity.
• Avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts and barriers to wildlife movement to the extent feasible.
• Analyze and consider opportunities to remediate existing barriers to wildlife connectivity and restore degraded habitat and open space.

Sierra Madre 2025 General Plan Progress Report
Page | 3
Through the end of 2025, the City has worked with consulting services to gather data, conduct public workshops, and coordinate with various City departments in its effort to make necessary updates. These updates are expected to be presented as a General Plan Amendment to be adopted by the Sierra Madre City Council by June 30, 2026.

3.0 General Plan Implementation Progress
The following subsections represent the progress the City has made towards implementing the actions of the General Plan during the 2025 reporting period. Please refer to Appendix A of this report for a checklist of progress by implementation action/program. The following subsections and Appendix A are provided consistent with the requirements of Government Code Section 65400(a)(2)(A).

3.1 Housing Element
July 26, 2022: Sierra Madre’s Housing Plan has been developed in response to community and decision-maker input; identified housing needs, resources and constraints; and experience gained from implementation of the existing Housing Element. The Housing Plan sets forth goals, policies and programs to address the following goals:

Goal 1: Maintain and enhance the quality of existing housing and ensure that new residential development is consistent with the Sierra Madre’s small-town character.

Goal 2: Facilitate the provision of a range of housing types to meet community needs.

Goal 3: Reduce governmental constraints on the maintenance, improvement and development of housing while maintaining community character.

Goal 4: Promote equal housing opportunities for all residents, including Sierra Madre’s special needs populations, so that residents can reside in the housing of their choice.

Goal 5: Promote environmental sustainability through support of existing and new development which minimizes reliance on natural resources.

This final Housing Plan section presents City of Sierra Madre’s goals, policies and programs for the 2021-2029 period and implementation actions. Please refer to Appendix A of this report.

3.2 Grants
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): On September 4, 2024, the Senior Minor Home Rehabilitation Program (MHRP) was established. The City coordinated with the Los Angeles County Community Development Authority and the Federal Government’s Department of Housing and Urban Development for the use of CDBG funding to offer low- and moderate- Sierra Madre 2025 General Plan Progress Report
Page | 4
income seniors in Sierra Madre grants for eligible construction costs not-to-exceed $17,255 per MHRP project. Eligible projects are intended to make mobility easier and may include but are not limited to: wheelchair ramps, handrails, grab bars, tub conversions to roll-in showers, roof repairs, plumbing repairs, and window replacement. Through 2025, the program remained active and was offered to 2 eligible seniors during the last half of fiscal year 24-25 and 6 eligible seniors during the first half of fiscal year 25-26. By December 31, 2025, 14 seniors submitted pre-qualification forms to the City. To determine eligibility, requests for additional information were sent to each applicant who submitted interest forms. Seniors determined eligible were sent a formal MHRP application. By December 31, 2025, 10 formal MHRP applications were received.

3.3 Regional Housing Needs Status
Adopted on July 26, 2022, the 6th Cycle Housing Element identifies the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), assigning the City of Sierra Madre 204 housing units to be created between 2021 and 2029. Of the 204 housing units to be created, RHNA allocates a distribution of housing units at various affordability levels to be created. The table below mirrors Table II-24 of Sierra Madre’s 6th Cycle Housing Element.

Income Level Percent of AMI* RHNA Units Share of Total
Very Low 0-50% 79 38%
Low 51-80% 39 19%
Moderate 81-120% 35 17%
Above Moderate 120%+ 51 26%
Total 204 100%
* AMI – Area Median Income
Sierra Madre 2025 General Plan Progress Report
Page | 5
The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) considers a housing unit created when a building permit has been issued to construct it. The table below represents the progress of housing units created for all years in the 6th Cycle Housing Element.

Income Level Units Created to Date RHNA Units Percent Created Very Low 0 79 0.012%
Low 71 39 100%
Moderate 1 35 2.9%
Above Moderate 31 51 60.8%
The 2025 Annual Housing Element Progress Tables are provided in Appendix C of this report.

Appendix A
General Plan Goals and Implementation Actions

2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT V-33 HOUSING PLAN
Table V-4: Housing Programs Summary 2021-2029
Housing
Program
Program
Goal
2021-2029
Objective
Funding
Source
Responsible
Agency
Time
Frame

PRESERVING HOUSING ASSETS

1. Preservation of
Historic
Structures
Preserve and
maintain historic
structures, and
revitalize older
housing and
neighborhoods.

Continue to
advertise
preservation
incentives and
process Mills Act
applications in a
timely manner.

General;
Federal Tax
Credits
Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
2021-2029

2. Adaptive
Reuse
Restore the
economic
usefulness of
historic buildings.

Provide expanded
opportunities for
housing, including
on properties in the
Religious Housing
Overlay (RHO).

General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
Conduct
workshop with
congregations
and non-profit
developers in
2022.

3. Minor Home
Repair Program
Provide financial
assistance for
home repairs to
lower income
households.

Develop program
guidelines and
conduct outreach
through the Senior
Center, Senior
Commission, City
newsletter and City
website. Seek to
assist 6 households
annually.

CDBG Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department;
Public Works
Department
Initiate
program and
conduct
outreach to
homeowners
by 2022.

Report on
progress
annually to
City Council
and LACDC.

4. Condominium
Conversion
Ordinance
Provide
protections for
tenants in
apartments
proposed for
conversion.

Continue to
implement
condominium
conversion
regulations.

General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
2021-2029

HOUSING DIVERSITY

5. Promote
Accessory
Dwelling Units
(ADUs)
Provide
additional sites
for rental housing
within existing
neighborhoods.

Legalize existing,
non-permitted
ADUs, making
them safe and
sanitary.

Update ADU
ordinance to
incorporate
incentives and
expand to C and M
zone districts.

Initiate amnesty
program. Advertise
in the City
Newsletter and on
the website. Seek to
achieve 12 units
annually, for 98
over the planning
period.

General;
Housing Asset
Fund (for ADU
incentives)
Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
Amend
ordinance in
2022 and reinitiate the
amnesty
program.

Conduct midcycle review
in 2025, and if
production or
affordability
falling short,
ensure
adequate
sites to meet
lower income
RHNA or
commit to
rezoning.

2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT V-34 HOUSING PLAN
Housing
Program
Program
Goal
2021-2029
Objective
Funding
Source
Responsible
Agency
Time
Frame

6. Housing
Opportunity Sites
& Rezone
Program
Provide
adequate sites to
address the
City’s RHNA and
incentivize
production of
affordable units.
1) Adopt new Land
Use designations
with Housing
Element; 2) Est.
and adopt new
multi-family &
Religious Housing
Overlay
designations; 3)
Amend Code for byright approval of
projects with min
20% lower income
units on rezone and
5 th cycle sites
General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
Adopt
Housing
Element in
2021. Adopt
new zoning
and amend
Code for
by-right
approvals in
mid-2022.
6a. Lot
Consolidation
Program
Provide
incentives for the
consolidation of
parcels into
larger
development
sites.

Conduct outreach to
property owners in
the Housing
Element rezone
sites and adopt a
Lot Consolidation
Ordinance to codify
available incentives.

General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
Adopt
Ordinance in
2022.

Conduct a
mid-cycle
review in 2025
and make
modifications
as necessary
to promote
housing on
small sites.
6b. Replacement
Housing Program
Ensure no net
loss of units
affordable to
lower income
households
Update Code to
specify replacement
housing
requirements
consistent with
Government Code
65583.2(g)(3).

General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department;
City Attorney’s
Office
Update Code
within one
year of
Housing
Element
adoption

7. Facilitate
Affordable
Housing on NonVacant Sites
Facilitate
development of
affordable
housing
consistent with
the community’s
needs.

Provide regulatory
and financial
assistance and
outreach to property
owners and the
development
community in
support of
affordable/mixed
income housing on
HE sites.

General;
Housing Asset
Fund; CDBG
Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
Starting in
2022

8. Partnerships
with Affordable
Housing
Developers
Partner with
affordable
housing
developers to
leverage their
expertise and
access to funds.

Continue to partner
with housing
providers through
incentives and/or
direct assistance.

Conduct a follow-up
workshop with
congregations.

General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
Conduct
workshop with
congregations
and non-profit
developers in
2022.

2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT V-35 HOUSING PLAN
Housing
Program
Program
Goal
2021-2029
Objective
Funding
Source
Responsible
Agency
Time
Frame

9. Affordable
Housing Funding
Sources
Leverage local
funds to
maximize
assistance.

Actively pursue a
variety of funding
sources for
affordable housing.

Support developers
in securing outside
funding.

Federal, State,
county and
private
Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
As projects
are proposed.

10. Section 8
Rental
Assistance
Assistance
extremely low
and very low
income
households with
rental payments.

Outreach to
landlords to
encourage their
participation.

Continue to provide
information and a
link to the program
on the City’s
website.

HUD Section 8 Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department;
LA County
Housing
Authority
Landlord
outreach 2022
and 2025

11. Homeowner
Assistance
Expand
homeownership
opportunities to
low and
moderate income
households.

Continue to provide
information on City
website on available
programs. Apply to
State in conjunction
with future projects.

General; State
and County
funds
Planning &
Community
Preservation
Dept; LA
County CDC;
State HCD
2021-2029

REMOVAL OF GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS

12. Reduced
Development
Fees for
Affordable
Housing
Reduce the costs
of developing
affordable
housing.

Provide planning
fee reductions,
deferrals or waivers
for affordable
housing projects.

General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
2021-2029

13. Affordable
Housing Density
Bonus
Provide density
and other
incentives to
facilitate
affordable
housing.

Continue to promote
density bonus
incentives in
conjunction with
discussions with
development
applicants.

General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
2021-2029

14. Alternative
Housing Models
Support the
provision of nontraditional,
innovative
housing types to
meet unique
needs.

Offer flexible zoning
and other incentives
to foster alternative
housing types.

General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
2021-2029

EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND SPECIAL NEEDS

15. Fair Housing/
Affirmatively
Furthering Fair
Housing
Promote fair
housing practices
and prevent
housing
discrimination.

Refer fair housing
complaints to the
Housing Rights
Center. Disseminate
fair housing
information.

General;
CDBG
LA County
CDC; Housing
Rights Center;
City Manager’s
Office
2021-2029

2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT V-36 HOUSING PLAN
Housing
Program
Program
Goal
2014-2021
Objective
Funding
Source
Responsible
Agency
Time
Frame

16. Housing
Opportunities for
Persons Living
with Disabilities
Support a range
of housing
options for
persons with
physical,
developmental
and mental
disabilities.

Provide reduced fees
for ADUs with
accessibility features.

Provide accessibility
grants through Minor
Home Repair
Program. Provide
developers Universal
Design Checklist and
encourage them to
offer features to
buyers. Pursue
State and Federal
funds available for
supportive housing in
future affordable
housing projects.

Expand large
community care
facilities to residential
zone districts.

Housing
Asset Fund;
CDBG; State
and Federal
funds.

Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
Amend ADU
Ordinance in
2022. Adopt
Minor Home
Repair
Program,
provide
Universal
Design
Checklist, and
amend Zoning
Code to
expand large
community
care facilities to
residential
zones in 2022.

17. Homeless
Services Strategy
Assist the
homeless and
persons at-risk of
homelessness in
obtaining shelter
and services.

Continue to:
1) Support the
SGVCOG Housing
and Homelessness
Coordinating Council
2) Provide
homelessness
resources on the City
website. Amend the
Code to increase the
size capacity for
shelters to 30 beds.

Develop processing
procedures for Low
Barrier Navigation
Centers.

General City
Manager’s
Office; Police
Department
Amend the
Code in 2022.

Develop
processing
procedures in
2022

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

18. Sustainable
Energy Programs
Encourage
property owners
to utilize
renewable
energy and
install energy
and water
efficiency
improvements.

Promote State
programs,
programs offered
through local
utilities, and the
Community Choice
program.

General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
Update the
City’s website
in 2021 with
information on
sustainable
energy
programs

2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT V-37 HOUSING PLAN
Housing
Program
Program
Goal
2014-2021
Objective
Funding
Source
Responsible
Agency
Time
Frame

19. Energy,
Environment and
Natural
Resources
Commission
Achieve higher
levels of energy
efficiency and
reduce
greenhouse gas
emissions.

Provide outreach
and education to
the development
community and
residents on how
to incorporate
sustainability in
project design and
existing structures.

General Planning &
Community
Preservation
Department
2021-2029
Appendix B
Department of Housing and Community Development
2025 Annual Housing Element Progress Tables
Jurisdiction Sierra Madre
Reporting Year 2025
Housing Element Planning Period 6th Cycle
Current Year
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 10
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
20 30
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
Single-family Attached 0 0 0
Single-family Detached 42 0 4
2 to 4 units per structure 0 4 0
5+ units per structure 0 0 0
Accessory Dwelling Unit 18 26 11
Mobile/Manufactured Home 0 0 0
Total 60 30 15
Infill Housing Developments and Infill Units Permitted # of Projects Units 26 30
00 16
59 42
0 Data is auto-populated based on data entered in Tables A, A2, C, and D Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Above Moderate
Indicated as Infill
Not Indicated as Infill
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
(Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Acutely Low
Extremely Low
0 0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Acutely Low 00 0
Extremely Low 00 0
Very Low 00 0
Low 00 0
Moderate 00 0
Above Moderate 00 0
Total 0 0 0
Streamlining Provisions Used - Permitted Units # of Projects Units SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone 00
SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split 00
AB 2011 (2022) 00
SB 6 (2022) 00
SMAP 00
Ministerial and Discretionary Applications # of Units
Ministerial 14 15
Discretionary 2 44
Density Bonus Applications and Units Permitted
Number of Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Units in Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0
Number of Units in Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0 Housing Element Programs Implemented and Sites Rezoned Count 5 0
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Use of Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process or SMAP (formerly SB 35 / 423) - Applications Number of SMAP Applications
Programs Implemented
Sites Rezoned to Accommodate the RHNA
Units Constructed - SMAP (formerly SB 35 / 423) - Permits Number of SMAP Applications Approved
Appendix C
State of the City Address 2025
The State of the City Address 2025 Presentation has been made available to view on the City’s Website and a feature video presentation is available to watch on the City’s YouTube page.

State of the City Address Presentation: City Communications | City of Sierra Madre State of the City Address Video Recording: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7n38JqMLv78 Appendix D
Annual City Budget Fiscal Year 2025-2026
Excerpt of the Planning and Community Preservation Department Budget Due to the length of the full Budget Report, the document is available to download on the City’s website at:
https://www.sierramadreca.gov/leadership-transparency/budget-andfinance/budgets/#YearlyBudgets Appendix E
City of Sierra Madre’s 6th Cycle Housing Element Compliance Letter from California State Department of Housing and Community Development dated August 1, 2022.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.gov
August 10, 2022
Jose Reynoso, City Manager
City of Sierra Madre
232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd
Sierra Madre, CA 91024
Dear Jose Reynoso:

RE: City of Sierra Madre’s 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Adopted Housing Element Thank you for submitting the City of Sierra Madre’s (City) housing element adopted on June 6, 2022 and received for review on July 26, 2022. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (h), the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review.

HCD is pleased to find the adopted housing element in full compliance with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Gov. Code). The adopted element, including changes, addresses the statutory requirements described in HCD’s May 27, 2022 review.

Additionally, the City must continue timely and effective implementation of all programs including, but not limited to, the following:
• Program 5 (Promote Accessory Dwelling Units)
• Program 6a (Lot Consolidation Program)
• Program 7 (Facilitate Development of Affordable Housing on Non-Vacant Sites) • Program 15 (Fair Housing/Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing) The City must monitor and report on the results of these and other programs through the annual progress report, required pursuant to Government Code section 65400.

Please be aware, Government Code section 65585, subdivision (i) grants HCD authority to review any action or failure to act by a local government that it determines is inconsistent with an adopted housing element or housing element law. This includes failure to implement program actions included in the housing element. HCD may revoke housing element compliance if the local government’s actions do not comply with state law.

Jose Reynoso, City Manager

Page 2 ends
← All documents from this meeting