Signal Hill City Council
November 12, 2024

AGENDA ITEM
TO:

HONORABLE CHAIR

AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:

COLLEEN T. DOAN

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT:
..titl e

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A PROPOSAL TO DEMOLISH
THREE EXISTING STORAGE STRUCTURES AT 1933 THROUGH 1939
TEMPLE AVENUE AND CONSTRUCT EIGHT DETACHED SINGLEFAMILY DWELLINGS WITH RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ..summ ary
Summary:

Form of Notice: Notice was published in the Signal Tribune newspaper per Government Code §65091(a)(4) on October 4, 2024; and was posted in accordance with Signal Hill Municipal Code Section 1.08.010 on October 4, 2024.

The applicant, Guy Alexander as agent for Signal Ventures, LLC, is requesting to demolish three existing garage/storage structures at a site known as 1933 through 1939 Temple Avenue and construct eight detached single-family dwellings on eight small single-family lots on an approximate 0.59-acre site located on the west side of Temple Avenue between East 19th and East 20th Streets. The proposal includes:
• Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SCH #2024100062 • Zoning Ordinance Amendment 24-01, to rezone the site and create the Courtyard Specific Plan (SP-21)
• Tentative Tract Map 74232, to create nine lots (eight numbered lots for dwellings and one lettered lot for common area and private driveway) • Site Plan and Design Review 24-01, for the site plan and architectural designs, and project identification wall sign
Strategic Plan Goal(s):

Goal No. 3 Increase the local housing supply to support current and potential Residents.

Continue efforts to support housing development projects through rezoning. ..recommendation
Recommendation:
1) Adopt the following resolution, entitled:

Attachment A

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL

ADOPTION OF INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SCH 2024100062, RELATIVE TO ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
24-01, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 74232, AND SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW 24-01, FOR THE COURTYARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-21)
2) Adopt the following resolution, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 24-01, AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO CHANGE AN APPROXIMATE 0.59-
ACRE SITE AT 1933 THROUGH 1939 TEMPLE AVENUE FROM

RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (RH) TO THE COURTYARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-21) AND ADDING CHAPTER 20.28, THE COURTYARD
SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-21) TO THE SIGNAL HILL MUNICIPAL CODE AND

ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE SITE
3) Adopt the following resolution, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
74232, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE AN APPROXIMATE 0.59-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 1933 THROUGH 1939 TEMPLE AVENUE FOR A TOTAL

OF NINE LOTS - EIGHT NUMBERED LOTS FOR DWELLINGS AND ONE

LETTERED LOT FOR COMMON AREA AND A PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
4) Adopt the following resolution, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW 24-01, A REQUEST TO DEMOLISH THREE EXISTING
GARAGE/STORAGE STRUCTURES AT 1933 THROUGH 1939 TEMPLE

AVENUE AND CONSTRUCT EIGHT DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY

DWELLINGS WITH RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON AN
APPROXIMATE 0.59-ACRE SITE
..body
Background:

In 2014, the City received an application for the development of ten townhome-style condominiums which after preliminary review and a determination of a complete application was later assigned Site Plan and Design Review 16-02 , a Tentative Tract Map 74232 for the Courtyard Residential Development, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment 16-03 to create a specific plan allowing deviations from the RH zoning standards. The deviations included:
• Six three-story dwellings, 32 feet in height.
• Reduced front yard setbacks.
• Reduced building separation for two buildings.
• Reduced open space.

On January 10, 2017, after an extensive planning process that included community outreach, two Planning Commission workshops, a Planning Commission public hearing, a neighborhood meeting, City Council public hearings and a study session, the City Council conducted a final public hearing on the project and determined they could not support the combination of deviations in the specific plan due to view impacts associated with the height of the three-story dwellings and the reduced northerly front setback on Temple Avene. The Council denied without prejudice Zoning Ordinance Amendment 16-

03. In August 2022, the property was sold to the current applicant Signal Ventures LLC who submitted plans for a preliminary design review proposing a new design in response to prior community feedback and City Council public hearings as follows:
• A reduced number of condominium units from 10 to 8 dwellings. • An increased northerly front setback on Temple Avenue to meet the 20-foot minimum.
• A reduction in the height of all units to two stories and the introduction of a flat roof design to further reduce building heights to below the allowed maximum height of 25 feet.

On May 26, 2023, after collaboration with planning staff, the applicant’s new architect, Bozena Jaworski, of Design Construction Services (DCS) submitted a revised proposal with a new design and a different product type, as follows:
• A revised site plan and new floor plans, which enabled the applicant to increase the number of parking spaces. As a result, an additional eight surface parking spaces, one for each dwelling unit and two guest parking spaces were provided. • Flat roofs were replaced with low slope tile roofs which provided adjacent homeowners to the north improved view and ventilation corridors. • A new architectural design to provide diversity and address the neighbors’ concerns.

View Policy
Due to the extensive history of previous proposals on the project site, the typical outreach process was slightly modified to accommodate community concerns. Typically, the story poles are installed and a view analysis is conducted after the developer outreach process.

However, in this instance, the view notices were mailed and the existing story poles from the previous project were revised prior to the developer outreach being conducted (Attachment A).

On October 9, 2023, consistent with the City’s View Policy, view notices were mailed to property owners and residents within a 500’ radius of the site informing them that story poles for the Courtyard project would be installed consistent with the project modifications the following week. Recipients of the notices were given until November 13, 2023, to request a view analysis for their property. Three residents north of the project site provided feedback. Two residents from the Temple View Condominiums (1957 Temple Avenue) expressed concerns that the development’s height obstructed views from their units and one resident from East 20th Street simply noted that two stories was too tall. A view analysis was requested by the two residents at 1957 Temple Avenue.

Developer Outreach
In addition to the View Notices mailed in October 2023, the applicant, in collaboration with DCS, initiated developer outreach efforts on November 30, 2023. A total of 16 outreach letters were sent to adjacent HOAs, homeowners, and two property management companies.

The purpose of the new Outreach was twofold:
• To inform the neighbors through the available Homeowners Association contacts about the change of the ownership of the property.
• To offer a presentation of the extensively redesigned 2023 project and gather any additional comments.

In January 2024, two residents responded to the outreach letter. One resident, from 1903 Temple Avenue (Unit 125), located west of the project site, expressed concerns about potential noise from heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units and the placement of windows affecting privacy. The second response came from a resident at 1903 Temple Avenue (Unit 225), who was concerned about privacy due to potential views into their existing unit. In response, the applicant confirmed that the HVAC units would be located in the side yard between buildings and shielded from nearby land uses by buildings, walls, and privacy fences. Additionally, the proposed six-foot-tall solid fence along the shared boundary line, along with existing 40-foot-tall trees on the adjacent Hillbrook Condominium’s property, would provide privacy screening and further reduce ambient noise concerns. No view analysis was requested.

In February 2024, a third response was received from a resident at 1957 Temple Avenue, Unit 104. This resident requested that no windows be placed on the building’s northern façade and that any windows facing their property be fixed, soundproof, and frosted or distorted for privacy. In response, the applicant confirmed that the first story windows and patio doors would face a ten-foot-high retaining wall and are situated approximately 18 feet below the neighboring units’ decks. Additionally, all windows will be double paned in accordance with Cal Green, and the second story windows of Unit 2, which face Unit 104 of the Temple View condominiums, are positioned below the balcony floor elevation of 135 feet and include obscured decorative glass and Bermuda style awnings to enhance the privacy of the proposed home. The second story windows are fixed, except the toilet compartment window and the bedroom window, which need to be operable to comply with egress requirements under the Uniform Building Code. Regarding concerns about the roofing material creating heat toward the balcony of Unit 104, the applicant explained that the concrete roof tiles would reflect some solar energy. However, due to the low slope of the new roofs, the reflection would primarily be directed away from existing structures.

No view analysis was requested.

View Analysis #1
On January 24, 2024, the applicant took photographs as requested from units 101 and 102 of the Temple View condominiums to demonstrate view impacts. A View Analysis report dated January 2024 was prepared and submitted to staff (Attachment B). It was determined that the view impacts for both units were neither primary nor secondary and therefore were unprotected views of non-eligible street and sky vistas. Since these views are neither the only views, nor of a unique landmark, the report concluded that there was no significant impact. Additionally, after two unsuccessful attempts to schedule a view analysis and no response received from the resident on East 20th Street, photos were taken from the ground level outside of the two-story condominium unit. The report concluded that the story poles were not visible and therefore, there was no impact on views.

Neighborhood Meeting
On March 21, 2024, a duly noticed neighborhood meeting was held in the City Council Chamber of City Hall. Two individuals from the neighboring northern property were in attendance. During the meeting, staff provided an overview of the planning process, the applicant presented preliminary plans, and the community members offered feedback.

The primary concerns raised included the following aesthetic/view issues:
• The close distance of the proposed Dwelling Unit 1 second-story roofs from the neighboring northern property’s patios (Units 101 and 102 Temple View condominiums).
• The height of the proposed Dwelling Unit 1 second story and roof blocking the view of Temple Avenue from both property’s patios (Units 101 and 102 Temple View condominiums).

It is important to note that the City’s View Policy is implemented when primary or secondary view impacts occur. Based on the View Policy, view subjects that are not eligible for analysis or preservation include:
• Buildings on neighboring lots.
• The sky.
• Vacant land that is developable under City code.
• Alleys or streets.

Applicant’s Response
In response to view concerns voiced at the Neighborhood meeting, the applicant voluntarily modified the project design, for Dwelling Unit 1 located on the northeast portion of the project site. This effort was aimed to further reduce project impacts by preserving the non-eligible street and sky views for Units 101 and 102 of the Temple View condominiums. Modifications included:
• Two-Story Revision: Unit 1 was changed from a two-story structure to a partial single- and partial two-story design. The volume of the second story roof and the area of the second story floor was reduced by 404 square feet. The ridgeline of the roof ridge was also lowered by approximately6 inches.
• Increased 2
nd Floor Setbacks: The second-floor elevations of Unit 1 were stepped back on the easterly and northerly sides. The easterly elevation was stepped back from Temple Avenue an additional 6’-11”. The north elevation of the second floor was designed with three step backs, resulting in increased building distances of 23’-1”, 17’-2”, and 13’-10” from units 101 and 102 of the Temple View condominiums rather than the initially proposed 8’-6” (see graphic below). • Footprint Adjustment: To maintain the same overall square footage, the footprint of the single-story portion of Dwelling Unit 1 was increased 410 square feet, resulting in a reduced front yard setback on the northeastern property boundary from the underlying zoning requirement of 20 feet to 13’-7”. • Elevations: New architectural elevations for Dwelling Unit 1 were provided due to the floor plan redesign, and the front elevation of Dwelling Unit 8 was modified to harmonize with the architectural style.

View Analysis #2
On June 27, 2024, consistent with the City’s View Policy, view notices were again mailed to affected property owners and residents notifying them that the story poles reflecting the additional changes for Unit 1 would be installed the week of July 9, 2024. Recipients of the notices were given until August 5, 2024, to notify the City whether they would like to have a view analysis prepared for their property. Only the story poles for Dwelling Unit 1 were updated to depict the changed elevation height and location. The other units’ height and location remained the same. The owner of Unit 101 of the Temple View condominiums informed the City in writing that there was no need for any further view analysis. The owner of Unit 102 of the Temple View condominiums requested an updated view analysis.

On August 9, 2024, the applicant took photographs from Unit 102 to demonstrate view impacts. A View Analysis report, dated August 2024, was prepared and submitted to staff (Attachment C). In accordance with the City’s view policy, the view impacts from Unit 102 of the Temple View condominiums consist of non-eligible street and sky vistas, which are classified as unprotected views. Since these views do not qualify as a primary or secondary view and are neither the only view nor of a unique landmark, the report concluded that there is no significant impact.

On the same day, the applicant met with the property owner of Unit 102 of the Temple View condominiums to discuss the development’s impacts. The owner was generally satisfied with the current design, except for the front roof ridgeline of Unit 1. Specifically, the owner requested that the front roof ridge at elevation point #6 be lowered by three inches to provide additional street views along Temple Avenue. Various options were presented and discussed, with the preferred solution being to change the front roof ridge from a Gable roof to a Hip roof.

Applicant’s Response
In response to the property owner’s request, the applicant again voluntarily modified the roof ridge design of Dwelling Unit 1 exceeding the City’s view policy requirements. This adjustment increased the non-eligible street view along Temple Avenue by approximately 27 inches for Unit 102, while also benefiting the adjacent views of Unit 101 of the Temple View condominiums. The modification included:
• Roof Ridge: The front roof ridge of Unit 1 was changed from a Gable roof to a Hip roof reducing the length of the roof ridge by approximately 10’-6” and thereby increasing the street visibility along Temple Avenue.

After conducting further outreach to those with concerns, the applicant revised the plans and on August 19, 2024, adjusted the story poles for Dwelling Unit 1 accordingly to reflect the revised ridgeline and reduced view impact.

Post View Analysis #2 Adjustment
On August 21, 2024, the resident of Unit 102 provided photographs that reflected the reduced length of the roof ridge to demonstrate view impacts. An updated View Analysis report, dated September 3, 2024, was prepared showing the new ridgeline in turquoise flags and was submitted to staff (Attachment D). This change satisfied the owner's concern, and no further issues have been raised.

In accordance with the Signal Hill View Policy, the developer has preserved, to the extent possible, all neighbor’s views through design considerations and neighbor input regardless of view designation or eligibility.

Planning Commission Public Hearing
On October 4, 2024, notices for a Planning Commission public hearing were mailed to property owners and residents within a 500’ radius of the site and MND SCH #20244100062 was filed with the State Clearinghouse and was made available on the City website.

Analysis:

Site Description
The project site is an infill parcel on the west side of Temple Avenue between East 19th and East 20th Streets within the Hilltop Neighborhood and Residential High Density (RH), zoning district. Condominium complexes surround the site on three sides. The surrounding developments were built in the 1980’s under the R-4 development standards, which allowed for denser, taller projects with reduced setbacks compared to current development standards.

Hillbrook Condominiums
• 82 dwelling units
• 3-stories, 35’ height
• 10’ Temple Ave. setback
Temple View Condominiums
• 16 dwelling units
• 3-stories, 35’ height
• 8’-6” Temple Ave.
setback
Project Site
• 8 dwelling units
• 2-stories, 23’ height
• 13’-7” and 26’-9”
Temple Ave. setback

VICINITY MAP
The existing zoning designations and land uses for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows:

Direction Zoning Designation Existing Land Use
Project Site Residential High Density (RH) Garage/storage structure and two non-residential building structures,
Northeast Residential High Density (RH) Temple View Condos Northwest Residential High Density (RH) Single-family dwelling (Smart Homes) South Residential High Density (RH) Hillbrook Condos -82 units West Residential High Density (RH) Hillbrook Condos -82 units East (Across
Temple Ave.)
California Crown Specific Plan
(SP-5) Single-family dwellings
Site Plan
The proposed site plan consists of eight detached single-family townhomes arranged in a U-shaped configuration. Vehicle and pedestrian access to the project site is provided on Temple Avenue via a two-way, 20-foot-wide private driveway in the center of the lot.

The site circulation features a hammerhead at the western end, providing access to dwelling units 4 and 5, surface parking spaces, and facilitating emergency turnaround.

The private driveway and surface parking spaces will include permeable decorative pavers for added aesthetics. To clearly delineate the pedestrian walkway within the private driveway, the decorative pavers will include two color variations.

The required lot area per unit of the underlying RH zone is 2,100 square feet. However, due to the site's long and narrow configuration, as well as the presence of two abandoned oil wells on the southeast and southwest portions of the site, Lot 7 falls short of this requirement by 61.33 square feet. These constraints make it impractical to fully meet the minimum lot area requirement of the underlying RH zoning; however, Section 20.66.060 of the Municipal Code allows a tolerance of up to a ten percent (210 square feet) deviation. In addition, Lot 7 is designed in harmony with the surrounding lots and will not negatively impact the overall design, layout, or development of the project.

The other lots range in size from 2,108 to 2,563 square feet, all of which exceed the minimum RH standard.

The underlying RH zoning district requires a 20-foot front yard setback on Temple Avenue. The proposed Temple Avenue setbacks which are not technically front setbacks, for Units 1 and 8 are 13’-7” and 26’-9”, respectively, averaging approximately 20 feet.

Parking
Onsite parking for the project complies with the multi-family parking standard even though the residential product type being proposed is single-family. The project provides two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and one designated surface parking space for each dwelling unit. Each garage provides 72 cubic feet of shelves for accessory storage.

Additionally, two guest parking spaces are located at the west end of the project site, positioned on each end of the hammerhead. All eight designated homeowner surface parking spaces and the two designated guest parking spaces will be clearly marked with appropriate signage.

Notably, on-street parking is allowed on both sides of Temple Avenue.

Site Plan
Floor Plan
The floor plans include four bedrooms and four bathrooms with approximately 2,122 to 2,144 square feet of living space and an attached two-car garage. See table below.

Dwelling Unit
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 st floor sf 1,261 851 851 851 851 851 851 851
2 nd floor sf 883 1271 1,287 1,287 1271 1271 1,287 1271 Total
Living sf 2,144 2,122 2,138 2,138 2,122 2,122 2,138 2,122 Garage sf 469 455 455 455 455 455 455 455
Dwelling Unit 1, unlike the other units, was redesigned from a two-story unit to a partial single-story design, resulting in a different floor plan compared to the two-story design of the remaining units.

Dwelling Unit 1 First Floor
Dwelling Unit 1 Second Floor
Dwelling units 2 through 8 feature a distinct two-story floor plan design that is reversible, with partial interior and exterior modifications to ensure that no two units are exactly the same.

Dwelling Units 2-8 First Floor Plan
Dwelling Units 2-8 Second Floor Plan
Elevations
The project's architectural theme is modern, simplified Spanish style, as depicted in the renderings below. The development incorporates architectural diversity by providing three exterior elevation designs and two different color schemes. There are four variations of entry porches, four entry door designs, three garage door styles, and several overhang roof style and rooftop configurations, all featuring photovoltaic solar structures. Each home will have a roof-mounted photovoltaic panel system compliant with current codes.

Design Element Number of Variations
Elevations 3
Color schemes 2
Garage door style 3
Entry porch style 4
Entry door style 4
Roof style 7
Exterior building materials include the following design elements:
• Fine textured stucco finish.
• Decorative Bermuda style awnings.
• Arto Tile Arabesque accent tiles.
• Iron cross bars.
• Forged steel baluster railings.
• Trellis’ (Unit 1 only).
• Metal window flower shelves.
• Concrete roof tiles.

The different colors schemes and elevation designs create architectural variation and articulation that is visually pleasing and is smaller in mass, scale, and density than the surrounding high density condominium structures.

Birdseye view looking northeast
Landscaping
The project proposes approximately 3,017 square feet (11%) of landscaped area, featuring drought-tolerant plants and water-conserving automatic irrigation systems in compliance with the City of Signal Hill Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance Section (13.10.010). The homeowner’s association will be responsible for maintaining all landscaping along the dwelling units’ frontages and the Temple Avenue frontage, while individual homeowners will maintain the landscaping within their private fenced yards.

In consideration of stormwater compliance and methane mitigation, Section 20.10.072 of the Municipal Code encourages permeable materials to hardscape by limiting hardscape within the front setback to a maximum of 25%. Lot 1 complies with this requirement by providing 24% hardscape. Lot 8, however, exceeds this limit, proposing 30% hardscape primarily due to the parking spaces provided for Dwelling Units 1 and 8. This additional hardscape is positioned behind a proposed wall with black metal picket fencing and is therefore obscured from the public right-of-way. The frontage beyond the retaining wall is fully landscaped with no hardscape material. In addition, the project has a compliant stormwater Low Impact Development plan and a methane mitigation plan that includes vent boxes in hardscape areas, effectively meeting the intent of the development standard.

Landscape Plan
Grading
The project site slopes from north to south. The grading plan proposes over-excavation for foundations of proposed buildings, walkways and driveways, compaction, and precise grading for construction of the residential buildings. Anticipated soil disturbance to balance the site is as follows:
• Cut - 1,802 cubic yards.
• Fill - 118 cubic yards.
• Export - 1,633 cubic yards.

Walls and Fences
Given the cut and fill required to level the site due to the natural slope, the project proposes several key fencing and retaining wall features.

1. South and West Property Lines:

A six-foot-tall solid vinyl perimeter fence is planned along the south and west property lines. The fence height deviates from the maximum allowed by the underlying zone in two areas. On the southern boundary, a 10-foot section of this fence will encroach within the 20-foot Temple Avenue setback for security purposes. It should be noted that this section of fence is technically in the rear yard of Lot 1 which allows a maximum six-foot fence height but appears to function as a front yard setback since it faces Temple Avenue. The Municipal Code limits fences in front yard setbacks to four feet. On the western boundary, a portion of fence will be erected above an existing retaining wall on Lot 4, exceeding the allowed six-foot height by approximately five inches.

The adjacent Hillbrook Condominium site, located to the south and west, has a wood fence approximately two feet from the project's south and west property lines. The proposed fencing would create a gap between the two fence structures. The Hillbrook Homeowners Association has the responsibility to maintain this area to prevent the accumulation of weeds and trash. To avoid this, staff and the applicant will reach out to the HOA to suggest removal of their fencing once the new fencing from the project is installed.

2. North Property Line
Due to the grade difference between the subject site and the properties to the north, retaining walls are proposed along the entire northerly property line. The portion of the wall parallel to the Temple View Condominium’s existing retaining wall will be 11 feet in height. The remaining portion of the northern property line will have a 10-foot wall which will be constructed by the pending Smart Homes development, adjacent to the north. A condition of approval has been added, requiring the project applicant to construct this portion of the wall if the Smart Homes development is unable to fulfill its obligation (Condition 3). Retaining walls are only limited in height by engineering, allowing as tall a wall as is necessary to sufficiently retain.

3. Front Yard Walls
Two retaining walls, positioned north and south of the entry driveway, are proposed within the front yard setback along Temple Avenue. Per the standards of the City’s Municipal Code, the maximum wall height within the front yard setback for non-retaining walls is four feet. The proposed walls exceed this standard, with the wall north of the driveway surpassing it by 1’-6” and the wall south of the driveway by eight inches.

The retaining wall north of the driveway is designed to protect the cut below the natural grade. This wall will range from 4’ to 5’-6” above finished grade, featuring stucco finish with Arto accent tiles and black metal picket fencing, with approximately 31% of the wall being open and transparent.

The retaining wall south of the driveway stabilizes two feet of fill above the natural grade and is topped with a segment of stucco wall approximately 4’-8” in height and also features the Arto accent tiles to coordinate with the design on the north side. Additionally, it will include approximately 32 linear feet of four-foot-tall black metal picket fencing, which is removable to provide access to the adjacent abandoned oil well.

Decorative Front Wall
The project design was reviewed by the Signal Hill police staff who inquired whether the driveway would be gated. No gate is proposed at this time. Should a gate be requested at a future time, a key code for the gate will be shared with the Signal Hill Police Department and with Los Angeles County Fire. There was also an inquiry regarding lighting which has two associated conditions of approval (.Condition Nos. 42 and 43)..

4. Privacy Fencing and Entry Gates
Private yards will be screened with six-foot-tall vinyl fencing with solid vinyl gates screening the trash and utility areas. The applicant has received confirmation from EDCO on the placing of carts on Temple Avenue for weekly pickups.

Signage
A 14.7-square-foot project identification sign, approximately 2’-8” in height is proposed on the front property wall north of the private driveway. The sign will feature the project name in individual bronze cast metal flush-mounted letters.

In accordance with the City’s municipal code, the project is permitted to have one wall sign with a maximum area of 20 square feet and a height of three feet, therefore the sign meets the City standards.

Entry Wall Identification Sign
Stormwater Compliance
The project site currently receives stormwater runoff from the adjacent Smart Homes property to the northwest, which drains into the municipal storm drain system. The Smart Homes property was recently entitled for the development of three detached residential condominiums. As part of this project, the Smart Homes applicant reached out to the Courtyard applicant to secure an agreement for shared sewer and stormwater facilities.

The stormwater and sewer from the Smart Homes property will be collected via separate stormwater and sewer lines in compliance with the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works and discharged toward Temple Avenue within a six-foot-wide public service easement. This easement between the two parties, which runs southeast from the northern portion of the hammerhead and extends east along the private driveway, has been approved by the City Engineer and was recently recorded for the purpose of installing, maintaining, repairing, renewing, and replacing an underground sanitary sewer line, sump pump, and stormwater drain line (Attachment E). The easement is shown on the Tentative Parcel Map and will be part of the recorded Final Parcel Map.

Additionally, the proposed project includes a stormwater drainage and erosion control system designed to manage stormwater runoff from both sites. The system features a series of inlet drains, catch basins, a trench drain, and permeable pavement that directs water into a modular stormwater infiltration system located beneath the permeable driveway pavers. The infiltration system captures stormwater runoff, stores it, and allows it to percolate into the ground.

Waste Management
As requested by staff, the applicant shared their proposed method for waste removal with the local trash hauling company, EDCO. The proposed number and location for waste containers is as follows:
• Each house has space for three waste containers.
• In accordance with EDCO’s established procedures, on the waste collection day the carts will be placed by homeowners in the designated area along the Temple Avenue curb.
• The containers will have a designated house number painted with 6” high numbers. • The Tentative Tract Map conditions of approval require that the CC&Rs include the required pickup procedures and additionally require that the containers shall not be placed on the curb any sooner than the afternoon of the day before pickup or remain in the street longer than the evening of the pickup service.

The representative from EDCO reviewed and approved the proposed placement of containers with a few additional placement directions (Attachment F). It is important to note that the total number of containers (24 total) would become an aesthetic and street parking nuisance if they were not to be removed promptly as required in the conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CC&Rs). In this case, the responsible homeowner would be in violation of their CC&Rs and the City Municipal Code and an enforcement case, including citations could be the result.

Regional Housing Needs Assessment
The Regional Housing Needs Assessment allocation (RHNA) is the target number of homes across income levels each city and county must zone for as part of their Housing Element. Signal Hill’s share of the regional housing needs allocation for the 2021-2029 Housing Element is 517 housing units (October 2021-present) as follows:

Table 1: Regional Housing Needs Assessment Allocation
Income Level RHNA Allocation
2021-2029
# of Permits
Issued
2021-present
Project Site
Extremely Low 80 _
Very Low 81 _
Low 78 _
Moderate 90 2 JADUs
Above Moderate 188 8 SFDs
19 ADUs 8 SFDs
Combined 517 29
The table above includes production numbers based on permits issued during this period, including Accessory Dwelling Units. It is anticipated that the proposed project, if approved and constructed, would be counted in the above-moderate income category.

Zoning Ordinance Amendment for a New Specific Plan
The applicant is proposing a Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) to incorporate a new specific plan. This amendment would allow for a single-family development format in place of the multi-family format currently permitted under the RH standards.

There are 14 residential specific plans in the City. These plans establish development standards that are specific to each development, taking into account site constraints and aiming to achieve broader City goals as stated in the City’s Strategic Plan and Land Use Element of the General Plan such as:
• Increase the local housing supply to support current and potential residents. • Encourage high-quality housing.
• Encourage ownership opportunities.
• Continue to use Specific Plans to improve on the quality of new development.

The development constraints at the subject site include:
• Long and narrow site configuration.
• Two abandoned oil wells.
• Grade/slope of site.
• Infill parcel surrounded by three-story, high density residential developments. • View Impacts.

The proposed ZOA would change the official zoning designation from the current RH classification to SP-21, the Courtyard Specific Plan and create development standards for a single-family format exclusive to the project site. The specific plan would permit the following deviations:

Development Standard RH Zoning District Proposed SP-21
Unit per square feet 2,100 sf. Lot 7: 2,038.67 sf
Min. front setback 20 ft DU 1: 13’-7”
Max. side yard projections 18” Privacy Awnings 22”
Max. hardscape material within
front setback 25% Lot 8: 30%
Patio Covers-Open Trellis
Open trellis shall not
be constructed in
front yards.
18” encroachment on Lot 1
(not technically a front yard)
Parking for SF w/4 bedrooms 3 garage spaces
2 garage spaces and 1
surface space per unit plus
2 guest parking stalls.

Min. parking stall size 10 ’x 20’ 9’ x 20’
Fence and wall heights in front
yard setback 4 ft
5’-6” with a minimum 30%
open/transparent along the
street frontage
(not technically a front yard)
Fence and wall height on side and
rear yard property line 6 ft 6’-6”
Consideration of Proposed Deviations from Current Standards

1. Minimum Separation between Main Buildings
In the RH zoning district, a minimum separation of 10 feet is required between main buildings on a single lot. This standard is intended for multi-family developments and historically has not been applied to single-family projects. Therefore, no separation requirement is proposed for this project.

2. Open Space Requirements
The RH zoning district requires that a minimum of 25% of the lot, after right-of-way dedications, be dedicated to open space. This standard is intended for multi-family development and historically has not been applied to single-family projects. Accordingly, no open space requirement is proposed for this development.

3. Maximum lot coverage
The RH zoning district permits a maximum lot coverage of 50%. While the project complies with this standard at 41.7%, it is important to note that this requirement is not intended for single-family projects.

4. Floor Area Ratio
The maximum permitted floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.50 includes the first story and any additional stories, including garages. This development standard is required in singlefamily zones (RL, RLM-1 and RLM-2). Although the project is located in the RH zoning district, where FAR is not required, staff analyzed the FAR in accordance with the singlefamily requirements. Lots 1 through 8 exceed the FAR limit by 28% to 55%, with the project’s average FAR at 0.65%.

5. Parking
In the RH zoning district, two garage spaces plus one additional space per bedroom beyond two are required, either within a garage or as assigned surface parking on the project site. This typically means a total of four parking spaces per dwelling unit.

For single-family developments in the RH zoning district, a three-car garage would be required for four- and five-bedroom units. The proposed parking plan partially complies, providing a two-car garage, with the third space designated as surface parking.

Additionally, while the zoning code requires one guest parking space per four units in multi-family developments, guest parking is not required for single-family projects.

However, this project exceeds the standard requirements by providing two guest parking spaces, fully complying with multi-family guest parking standards.

6. Density
A maximum of 12 units is allowed on this site per the existing RH zoning standards. Based on the developer’s understanding of site project history and the surrounding neighborhoods concerns, the applicant is proposing eight single-family units, which is 15% fewer units than the maximum allowed.

7. Setback from Temple Avenue
As previously discussed, Unit 1 was redesigned from a two-story unit to a partial singlestory design to preserve street and sky views along Temple Avenue for the adjacent residents in the Temple View condominiums. As a result, the second story was significantly reduced in size, and the first-floor footprint was equally expanded to maintain the same overall square footage as the other proposed units. Consequently, the front setback for Unit 1 was changed from 26’-9” to 13’-7”, deviating from the RH zoning district’s front yard setback requirement.

In comparison to the adjacent condominiums, Unit 1 is setback five feet more than the Temple View condominiums to the north, and Unit 8 is setback 16’-9” more than Hillbrook Condos to the south, resulting in the proposed project being positioned, on average, approximately 11 feet farther from Temple Avenue than the neighboring developments.

The zoning ordinance amendment from RH to SP-21 would modify the setbacks on the project site while maintaining general consistency with the surrounding neighborhood residential uses.

Temple Avenue Setbacks
Tentative Tract Map
The applicant is proposing Tentative Tract Map 74232 to subdivide the project site into nine lots - eight numbered lots for detached single-family townhomes and one lettered lot for common areas including landscaping, two designated guests and two designated homeowner parking spaces, and a private 20-foot-wide T-shaped driveway. Tentative Tract Map 74232 has been reviewed and deemed sufficient by the City Engineer. The document has been transmitted to the appropriate agencies for formal review. As of the publish date of this agenda item, formal comments from the Los Angeles County Sanitation District have been received-no issues listed, and the Los Angeles County Fire has preliminarily approved the hammerhead circulation design. Any additional comments received will be applied to the construction drawings during the plan check phase of the project.

The project requires implementation of CC&Rs, which generally cover architectural control and exterior modifications, use of properties, maintenance, common areas, etc.

CC&Rs are enforced exclusively by the HOA and not by the City. The CC&Rs are recorded with the Final Map. No CC&Rs have been provided for review at this time; however, a condition of approval has been provided regarding submittal and approval of CC&Rs prior to issuance of a building permit.

The tentative tract map requires approval from the City of Signal Hill Planning Commission, and the final tract map requires approval from Los Angeles County and the City of Signal Hill City Council.

Oil Code Compliance
Two abandoned oil wells are present on the project site – Dabney-Johnston Oil Corporation Well #79 known as “estate of Louise E. Dabney” (API No. 037-09476) located in southwest corner of the site, and the Termo Company Well #3 (API No. 037-11166) located near the southeast corner. In compliance with the City’s Oil and Gas Code regarding development on properties with abandoned oil wells, both wells were located, excavated, and tested for methane leaking, then surveyed and a vent cone installed.

In 2021, a Well Abandonment Report was prepared by the applicant and approved by the City’s Oil Services Coordinator. However, in accordance with Section 16.24.040 of the City’s Oil and Gas Code, the 24-month validation period has expired, and a new investigation permit and clearance will be required prior to issuance of demolition, building, or grading permits as noted in the Conditions of Approval.

The project has been designed to ensure both abandoned wells are accessible in an emergency capacity and that no habitable structures will be placed on top of or within close proximity to them, as defined in the City of Signal Hill Code (Section 16.24.050).

Well #79 is located near proposed open parking spaces, providing a 10-foot unobstructed radius from the nearest structure and more than 10 feet of clearance from the nearest property lines, allowing for unobstructed access to the wellhead if needed. Similarly, Well #3 is located near proposed open parking spaces, providing a 10-foot radius that is partially unobstructed by a four-foot-tall removable metal picket fence. The fence is designed and installed to be easily removed, ensuring full access to the adjacent wellhead, when necessary, with more than 10 feet of clearance from the nearest property lines.

Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA)
Phase I and a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Reports were prepared in 2008 and 2021, respectively.

In February 2022, a Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) was prepared to assess risks to residents, construction workers, and builders based on the site’s materials and intended uses (Attachment G). The HHRA evaluated potential health risks to human receptors from detected constituents in the soil and soil vapor and concluded that the estimated risks were “safe and protective of public health” (Federal Register 56(20):3535, 1991) and within the acceptable risk range for the Department of Toxic Substance Control.

Due to the presence of the two abandoned oil wells within 100 feet of the proposed development, the investigative findings, and the City’s methane mitigation requirements include a Modified Active Methane Mitigation System pursuant to the City’s Oil and Gas Code Methane mitigation measures have been included as conditions of approval within the SPDR 24-01 resolution (Exhibit A, Condition No. 61).

The HHRA was reviewed by the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) (Attachment H), who agreed with the findings presented in the HHRA report. The inference is the property can be redeveloped for the proposed future use.

Green Energy Design Features
The project incorporates several green and energy-efficient features, including compliance with the California Green Building Standards (CalGreen), the California Energy Code, Low Impact Development (LID) requirements, and landscape and water efficiency measures (Attachment I).

Environmental Review
An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared for the Site Plan and Design review, Zoning Ordinance Amendment, and Tentative Tract Map and found potentially significant environmental impacts unless mitigated. Mitigation measures have been included to address Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Geology and Soils. The City Council will be the approving authority of the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

The City of Signal Hill is required to certify this IS/MND and consider the recommended mitigation measures and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for adoption as a condition of approval in the land use decision (i.e., SP-21).

Conclusion
The proposed project has undergone a comprehensive review, addressing community feedback, view impacts, planning requirements, and environmental considerations. Staff has prepared four resolutions for approval. The adoption of the Specific Plan and Final Tract Map will require review and approval by the City Council.

Attachments:

A. Neighborhood Outreach Report dated October 2, 2024
B. View Analysis #1 dated January 2024
C. View Analysis #2 dated August 2024
D. View Analysis #2 updated September 3, 2024
E. Grant of Easement Recorded on July 26, 2024
F. Waste Management Review by EDCO
G. Mearns Consulting LLC., HHRA dated February 16, 2022.

H. State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Memorandum I. Green Features
Planning Commission Resolution: IS/MND, SCH #2024100062 Planning Commission Resolution: Zoning Ordinance Amendment 24-01 Planning Commission Resolution: Tentative Tract Map 74232 Planning Commission Resolution: Site Plan and Design Review 24-01 The Courtyard
at Signal Hill
Neighborhood Outreach Report
Update October 2, 2024
The Courtyard property has a long history, starting in 2016, when the previous owner submitted a planning application for a 10 condominiums subdivision with a mix of two- and three- story townhomes. The project’s 3-story height was challenged by the neighbors, and finally denied by the City Council. The project was redesigned to nine -2 story units, then reduced to eight units in late 2020.

In 2022 the 1933 Temple Avenue property was acquired by the new owner, Signal Ventures LLC, represented by Mr. Vineet Sharma.

The old plans were discarded and new preliminary plans for eight detached, two-story, single-family homes prepared by Bozena Jaworski, new project architect, considering the neighborhood input after 2016 plans submittal and comments gathered from a View Analysis in July 2020.

Mrs. Colleen Doan, Community Development Director/Project Planner advised Mr.

Sharma to reach out to the adjacent condominium associations, to provide an update on the change of ownership and pending preliminary project review.

The suggested Outreach was in addition to the View Notice mailed on October 9, 2023, to the property owners within a 500 foot radius of the proposed project. The View Notice provided a short description of the revised project, explained the procedures of the View Policy, and informed about upcoming neighborhood meeting and public hearings.

The architect approached Community Development to obtain the HOA contacts, however the updated list of Homeowners Associations was not available. The Outreach list was completed based on the other projects’ available contacts.

The purpose of the new Outreach was twofold:
• to inform the neighbors through the available Homeowners Association contacts about the change of the ownership of the property and, • to offer a presentation of the extensively redesigned project directly to the associations and its members and gather any additional comments that may not have been made previously.

The Outreach letters were sent on November 30, 2023, to a total of 16 adjacent HOA or homeowners and two property management companies (see attached). Two letters were returned. We have not received any response to the Outreach letters.

Attachment A
Signal Ventures LLC, 9 Lyra Way, Coto De Caza, CA 92679  Tel: (310) 987-1204  February 28th Update:

On January 23 and 24, Mrs. Colleen Doan, Community Department Director forwarded the Outreach letter to two of the neighbors, active in the previous project’s reviews.

Two neighbors responded to the Outreach letter.

Mr. David Fukumoto, 1903 Temple Avenue, Unit 125, located on the west side of Courtyard.

Mrs. Veronica Giese, 1903 Temple Avenue, Unit # (not provided).

The following is a short memo of abbreviated communications between Mr. Fukumoto and Architect, Bozena Jaworski.

Jan. 24th Mr. David Fukumoto emailed following concerns:

Noise and privacy - placement of the windows and AC unit, Jan. 25th Architect response:

Please provide unit number.

Jan 25th – Mr. David Fukumoto emailed following concerns:

Location of the unit – west side, mentioned location of his unit provides only for 30 to 75 minutes of sunlight, Repeated concern about the noisy AC unit.

Jan. 26th Architect response:

Applicant offers outreach meeting with interested homeowners. We would like to meet with you and verify the project location in relation to your unit. Additional planting areas can mitigate the sound. Location of AC unit is flexible. We can discuss the mitigation measures when we meet on site.

Jan. 27th – Mr. David Fukumoto emailed following concerns:

Suggesting location of the AC unit in a side yard or top of roof, and Ficus hedge 7 to 8’ high as sound mitigation.

Jan. 31st – Architect Response
Requesting a 1903 Temple Avenue Site visitation and site meeting with the interested and affected neighbors before the neighborhood meeting.

It would allow to evaluate the location of the Mr. Fukumoto’s and Mr. & Mrs. Giese’s units and consider the best mitigation measures.

Jan, 31st- Mr. David Fukumoto email
Suggesting sound deadening, freeway style fence. Requested floor and backyard plan.

Feb.1st – Architect Response
Please allow me to enter the back yard to evaluate the impact and mitigation measures.

Feb. 1st – Mr. David Fukumoto email
No meeting, please email plans.

Feb 13th – Architect response:

Plans emailed with color sketch of existing approx. 40’ tall trees in the Hillbrook’s side yard.

Trees are located between Mr. Fukumoto's unit and Courtyard homes.

Signal Ventures LLC, 9 Lyra Way, Coto De Caza, CA 92679  Tel: (310) 987-1204  AC units will be placed in the side yards of new homes. Units are low sound, very quiet, below 56 DB. The fence will be built of solid vinyl panels.

Estimated distance from homes to Mr. Fukumoto's unit approx. 50’.

Please note, Architect was denied the site access to measure and evaluate.

Feb. 14
th – Mr. David Fukumoto's email stated the distance to property line is 10 feet.

Feb 15th – Architect response:

The best solution would be to visit your backyard and measure the distance for our records.

Otherwise see you at the Neighborhood meeting.

Update 03/19/2024
March 7th- Mr. Fukumoto provided access to the 1903 Temple Avenue backyard. Architect measured distance from the building and balcony to the existing fence. The plans were updated with verified information.

The following is a short memo of abbreviated communications between Mrs. Veronica Giese and Architect, Bozena Jaworski.

Jan. 25th - Mrs. Veronica Giese emailed the following concerns:

They believe the project will impact view and light. Would like to see the presentation.

Jan. 26th Architect response:

We will gladly provide a presentation, please let us know the most convenient time for you and Jason. Please request View Analysis to address your view concerns.

Jan. 30th –
- Mrs. Veronica Giese Email
No need for View Analysis
Privacy concern – proposed homes windows will be looking into Giese’s bathroom window.

Can privacy shutters alleviate the issue?
Regarding presentation – yes, they would like to have a presentation event set up for the neighbors, to have opportunity to ask questions and receive more information.

Jan. 31st – Architect Response:

Provided information about presentation of new project to be scheduled soon at the Neighborhood Meeting. Emphasized benefits of the 1903 Temple Avenue Site visitation with the interested and affected neighbors before the neighborhood meeting.

It would allow to evaluate the location of the Mr. Fukumoto’s and Mr. & Mrs. Giese’s units And best mitigation measures.

No further communication at the current date.

Signal Ventures LLC, 9 Lyra Way, Coto De Caza, CA 92679  Tel: (310) 987-1204  The following is a short memo of abbreviated communications between Mr. Alin Chitanu and Guy Alexander III, Signal Ventures partner.

Alin Chitanu address: 1957 Temple Avenu, Unit 104
Original message --------
From: Alin Chitanu <[email protected]>
Date: 2/27/24 6:27 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: [email protected]
Cc: Vineet Sharma <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: 1933 Temple - The Courtyard - View Analysis Hi,
If the height and the distance from my balcony remains where it is now, than it’s OK with me.
* I will take pictures for reference as in the past, we were told that they will lower it with the next story poles, but the next time put story poles they were in fact higher not lower ! The only remaining issue to clear are:
- there should be no windows on the wall facing our property, Applicant’s Response:

The 2nd story windows of the proposed homes face the 1957 Temple Avenue property line block wall and blank, solid wall of the parking garage. The Bermuda awnings will protect the privacy of the new homes. The bathroom window will be fixed, decorative, obscure glass. The toilet compartment will have openable, obscure glass window. The master bedroom requires openable egress window per California Building Code.

The 1st story windows, and patio doors of the proposed homes face a 10 feet high retaining wall. The new homes patios are located approx. 18 feet below Mr. Chitanu's deck level.
-*and if there are any windows that can see on our property or balcony, -they should not have the choice to be open, they should be just like a skylight -they should be double pane or even triple pane (sound proof in both directions) for privacy and silence
-they should be matted or distorted, not see through for privacy.

Applicant’s Response: No windows facing Mr. Chitanu’s balcony. All windows of the first and second story will be double pane in compliance with CalGreen regulations. -the material used for roofing should not be the kind that will focus all the heat onto our balconies l.

Signal Ventures LLC, 9 Lyra Way, Coto De Caza, CA 92679  Tel: (310) 987-1204  Applicant’s Response:

The concrete roof tiles will reflect a portion of the solar energy, however due to the low slope of the new roofs the reflection will be mostly directed away from the existing structures.

Thank you
Regards
Alin Chitanu
1957 Temple Ave. Unit 104
9492834372
Sent from IPhone
Summary of concerns:

AC Units location - Condensing units are to be located in the side yards of all homes.

Noise and privacy:

West side - existing trees on the West side provide a privacy screen and mitigate the standard medium density residential ambient noise of approx. 40 to 60 dB.

North side – the proposed homes 2nd floor windows are located below the 1957 Temple Avenue decks and balconies.

Proposed Patios face the retaining wall and are located approx. 18 feet below neighboring units decks.

Bozena Jaworski, Architect
DCS Design Construction Services, Inc.

Attachment: List of contacts, project location map.

PRESENTED BY:

SIGNAL VENTURES LLC

THE COURTYARD

VIEW ANALYSIS
January 2024
Attachment B
January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 2 -of 17
This report summarizes the visual impacts of the proposed project located at 1933 Temple Ave. and the views of two neighbors located at 1957 Temple Ave, respectively Units 101, 102, and one neighbor located at 2744 E. 20th St.

On the request of Collen Doan, we also reached out to the resident at 1957 Temple, Unit 104, Alin Chitanu.

In an email response, Mr. Chitanu stated, “If the height and the distance from my balcony remains where it is now, then it’s OK with me.”
Mr. Chitanu had other concerns regarding privacy that we will address at the Neighborhood Outreach Meeting which is scheduled for March 21, 2024.

Overview of Participants’ Locations
The Courtyard
1957 Temple
Unit 101
Unit 102
2744 E. 20th
St.

January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 3 -of 17
The Courtyard – View Analysis
Individual Narrative Report
Resident: Stephanie Summerville Address: 1957 Temple, Unit 101 Setting:

Stephanie’s unit is a single-level condo located on the first floor above the parking structure of the Temple View complex. View planes face South from Balcony, South from Screen Door, and South from Living Room.

Documentation of second view analysis is attached.

View Description View Policy (Section 3.D) View Designation 1 Facing South / Outside Lefthand View from BalconyOnly View in Structure No Secondary. While this is the most important view of the unit, it is neither the only view nor is
it of a unique landmark. Per the Signal Hill view
policy; a viewing area shall be designated a
“primary view area” if two or more conditions
exist. NO IMPACT
Most Important View Yes
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
2 Facing South & Southeast /
Doorway at Right-hand View
from Balcony
Only View in Structure No Secondary. NO IMPACT
Most Important View No
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
3 Facing South / Inside of Living
Room looking South
Only View in Structure No Secondary. NO IMPACT
Most Important View No
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
Conclusion:

In accordance with the Signal Hill View Policy, the developer has tried to preserve, to the extent possible, all neighbor’s views through design considerations and neighbor input regardless of view designation.

As designed, The Courtyard project protects the expansive sky view which is the primary attribute of the unit while partially obscuring the view of the condominium and trees across the site.

January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 4 -of 17
Current Plan - Resident: Stephanie Summerville Address: 1957 Temple, Unit 101 Living Room
Balcony (middle)
January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 5 -of 17
Balcony (middle)
(Balcony – corner – closest to Temple Ave.)
January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 6 -of 17
(Balcony – corner – furthest away from Temple Ave.)
(Balcony – corner – furthest away from Temple Ave. – laying down on lounge chair) January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 7 -of 17
Living Room
Living Room – sitting down
January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 8 -of 17
Living Room – sitting down
Dining Room – sitting down
January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 9 -of 17
Living Room – sitting down
Dining Room – sitting down
January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 10 -of 17
The Courtyard – View Analysis
Individual Narrative Report
Resident: Steven Flores Address: 1957 Temple, Unit 102
Setting:

Steven’s unit is a single-level condo located on the first level above the parking garage of the Temple View complex.

Photos were taken from Steven’s balcony. As we entered the house, we asked him where he would like the photos to be taken and he stated outside would be most ideal. He pointed out that his main view was of the palm trees in the distance.

View Description View Policy (Section 3.D) View Designation 1 Facing Southeast from Western Edge of
Balcony
Only View in Structure No Secondary. NO IMPACT
Most Important View No
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
2 Facing Southeast from Middle of
Balcony
Only View in Structure No Secondary. While this is the most important view of the unit, it is neither
the only view nor is it of a unique
landmark. Per the Signal Hill view
policy; a viewing area shall be
designated a “primary view area” if two
or more conditions exist. NO IMPACT
Most Important View Yes
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
3 Facing South from middle of of Balcony Only View in Structure No Secondary. NO IMPACT Most Important View No
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
Conclusion:

In accordance with the Signal Hill View Policy, the developer has tried to preserve, to the extent possible, all neighbor’s views through design considerations and neighbor input regardless of view designation.

As designed, The Courtyard project protects the expansive sky view which is the primary attribute of the unit while partially obscuring the view of the condominium and trees across the site.

January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 11 -of 17
2024 Current Plan - Resident: Steven Flores Address: 1957 Temple, Unit 102 Living Room
Balcony
January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 12 -of 17
Balcony
Living Room
January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 13 -of 17
Living Room (Sitting down)
Bedroom Standing
January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 14 -of 17
Bedroom Sitting on Bed
January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 15 -of 17
The Courtyard – View Analysis
Individual Narrative Report
Resident: Diana Gillis Address: 2744 E. 20th St
Setting:

Diana’s unit is a two-story condo located at 2744 E. 20th St A phone call and message were left for Diana on December 07, 2023, to schedule a view analysis. To date, nobody has responded to the message. Photos were taken from the front and garage side of Diana’s unit at ground level.

View Description View Policy (Section 3.D) View Designation 1 Facing South from ground level in front
of unit.

Only View in Structure No NO IMPACT
Most Important View No
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
Conclusion:

In accordance with the Signal Hill View Policy, the developer has tried to preserve, to the extent possible, all neighbor’s views through design considerations and neighbor input regardless of view designation.

As designed, The Courtyard project protects the expansive sky view which is the primary attribute of the unit.

January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 16 -of 17
2024 Current Plan - Resident: Diana Gillis Address: 2744 E. 20th Street January 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 17 -of 17

THE COURTYARD

VIEW ANALYSIS
August 2024
Attachment C
August 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 2 -of 5
This report summarizes the visual impacts of the proposed project located at 1933 Temple Ave. and the views of two neighbors located at 1957 Temple Ave, respectively Units 102 located at 2744 E. 20th St.

On the request of Colleen Doan, we also reached out to the residents at 1957 Temple, Unit 101 and Unit 102.

In an email response on 08/07/2024, Ms. Stephanie Summerville stated, “I have no need for any further view analyses. Changes are noted and appreciated”.

Mr. Stephen Flores from Unit 102 requested view analysis. On 08/09/2024, we visited Unit 102 and performed the view analysis.

Overview of Participants’ Locations
The Courtyard
1957 Temple
Unit 101
Unit 102
August 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 3 -of 5
The Courtyard – View Analysis
Individual Narrative Report
Resident: Steven Flores Address: 1957 Temple, Unit 102
Setting:

Steven’s unit is a single-level condo located on the first level above the parking garage of the Temple View complex.

Photos were taken from Steven’s balcony. As we entered the house, we asked him where he would like the photos to be taken and he stated outside would be most ideal. He pointed out that his main view was of the palm trees in the distance.

View Description View Policy (Section 3.D) View Designation 1 Facing Southeast from Western Edge of
Balcony
Only View in Structure No Secondary. NO IMPACT
Most Important View No
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
2 Facing Southeast from Middle of
Balcony
Only View in Structure No Secondary. While this is the most important view of the unit, it is neither
the only view nor is it of a unique
landmark. Per the Signal Hill view
policy; a viewing area shall be
designated a “primary view area” if two
or more conditions exist. NO IMPACT
Most Important View Yes
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
3 Facing South from middle of Balcony Only View in Structure No Secondary. NO IMPACT Most Important View No
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
Conclusion:

In accordance with Signal Hills View policy, Mr. Flores unit does not qualify for view protection. The unit does not have any primary views. However, we went above and beyond the view polity requirements and modified the front dwelling design to expand the sky and distant views for both units. In an effort to open the views, the development made the following modifications:

1. Reduced the square footage on the 2nd floor.

2. Increased 2nd floor setback to create more distance between our front unit and balconies of Mr. Flores (UNIT 102) and Ms.

Summerville (UNIT 101).

3. Revised the 2nd floor roofline.

As designed, The Courtyard project protects the expansive sky view which is the primary attribute of the unit while partially obscuring the view of the condominium and trees across the site.

August 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 4 -of 5
Living Room (standing up)
Living Room (sitting down)
August 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 5 -of 5
Balcony (sitting down)
Balcony (sitting down)

THE COURTYARD

VIEW ANALYSIS
UPDATED: SEPTEMBER 3, 2024
Attachment D
September 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 2 -of 6
This report summarizes the visual impacts of the proposed project located at 1933 Temple Ave. and the views of two neighbors located at 1957 Temple Ave, respectively Units 102 located at 2744 E. 20th St.

On the request of Colleen Doan, we also reached out to the residents at 1957 Temple, Unit 101 and Unit 102.

In an email response on 08/07/2024, Ms. Stephanie Summerville stated, “I have no need for any further view analyses. Changes are noted and appreciated”.

Mr. Stephen Flores from Unit 102 requested view analysis. On 08/09/2024, we visited Unit 102 and performed the view analysis.

We performed our view analysis on 08/09/2024, Mr. Flores mentioned that he would be very happy if we can lower the Gable roof on the 2nd floor (facing Temple Ave) by 3”. In response to Mr. Flores’ request, we have changed the Gable roof to a Hip roof, lowering the Gable end by 27”.

Below is the email from Steven Flores providing feedback Overview of Participants’ Locations
The Courtyard
1957 Temple
Unit 101
Unit 102
September 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 3 -of 6
The Courtyard – View Analysis
Individual Narrative Report
Resident: Steven Flores Address: 1957 Temple, Unit 102
Setting:

Steven’s unit is a single-level condo located on the first level above the parking garage of the Temple View complex.

Photos were taken from Steven’s balcony. As we entered the house, we asked him where he would like the photos to be taken and he stated outside would be most ideal. He pointed out that his main view was of the palm trees in the distance.

View Description View Policy (Section 3.D) View Designation 1 Facing Southeast from Western Edge of
Balcony
Only View in Structure No Secondary. NO IMPACT
Most Important View No
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
2 Facing Southeast from Middle of
Balcony
Only View in Structure No Secondary. While this is the most important view of the unit, it is neither
the only view nor is it of a unique
landmark. Per the Signal Hill view
policy; a viewing area shall be
designated a “primary view area” if two
or more conditions exist. NO IMPACT
Most Important View Yes
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
3 Facing South from middle of Balcony Only View in Structure No Secondary. NO IMPACT Most Important View No
Subject of View is Unique Landmark No
Conclusion:

In accordance with Signal Hills View policy, Mr. Flores unit does not qualify for view protection. The unit does not have any primary views. However, we went above and beyond the view policy requirements and modified the front dwelling design to expand the sky and distant views for both units. In an effort to open the views, the development made the following modifications:

1. Reduced the square footage on the 2nd floor.

2. Increased 2nd floor setback to create more distance between our front unit and balconies of Mr. Flores (UNIT 102) and Ms.

Summerville (UNIT 101).

3. Revised the 2nd floor roofline.

As designed, The Courtyard project protects the expansive sky view which is the primary attribute of the unit while partially obscuring the view of the condominium and trees across the site.

September 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 4 -of 6
Living Room (standing up)
Living Room (sitting down)
September 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 5 -of 6
Balcony (sitting down)
Balcony (sitting down)
September 2024 Courtyard View Analysis - 6 -of 6
Post- view-analysis Adjustments:

Steven asked us to try and lower the roofline (shown in the image below in pink).

In response, we changed the requested Gable roof to a Hip roof. Architectural plans were updated and On Monday, August 19, 2024, the storypoles were adjusted.

Steven asked us to try and lower this roof. In
response, we changed this Gable roof to a Hip
roof. The storypoles were adjusted to show the
new Hip roof.

Attachment E

10/8/2024
1933 Temple Avenue
Waste Management :

Each house has a proposed space for three waste carts. On the waste collection day the carts will be placed by homeowners in the designated area along the street curb.

At the present time waste collection is provided by Edco. This is an established procedure.

The Builder and Architect requested Edco review of the proposed waste can’s location on the pick-up day. Mr. Sanchez reviewed the proposed location. The proposed placement of carts on the collection day appears to be adequate.

The containers will have designated house number painted with 6” high numbers.

RE: 1933 - 1947 Temple Ave, Signal Hill New project
Carlos Sanchez<@edcodisposal.com>
Wed, May 10, 2023 9:05 AM
to me, Guy Alexander III <[email protected]>
Vineet Sharma <[email protected]>
Option #2 will work placing the carts on Temple Ave.
• Please set out trash containers in your designated collection area on the street with the wheels against the curb or the edge of the roadway. Arrows on the lid should point toward the street.
• Automated carts should be placed at least 2 feet away from each other and obstructions such as parked cars, trees, telephone poles and mailboxes. • Please be careful not to place carts in areas of traffic, such as bike lanes, in order to avoid blocking paths of travel.

Thank you
Attachment F

MEARNS CONSULTING LLC

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

RISK ASSESSORS
738 Ashland Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90405
Cell 310.403.1921
Tel 310.396.9606 Fax310.396.6878
[email protected]
www.MearnsConsulting.com
Human Health Risk Assessment
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022
Prepared for:

DL Science, Inc.
532 W. Maple Avenue
El Segundo, California 90245
Prepared by:

Mearns Consulting LLC
738 Ashland Avenue
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attachment G
78 MEARNS CONSULTING LLC

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

RISK ASSESSORS
738 Ashland Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90405
Cell 310.403.1921
Tel 310.396.9606 Fax 310.396.6878
[email protected]
www.MearnsConsulting.com
___________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 February 16, 2022
via email
Mr. David L. Lucero
DL Science, Inc.
532 W. Maple Avenue
El Segundo, California 90245
RE: Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment
1933 Temple Avenue, Signal Hill, California 90755
Dear Mr. Lucero:

I am pleased to present this Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) for the 0.55–acre site located at 1933 Temple Avenue in Signal Hill, Los Angeles County, California 90755 (the site) pursuant to the contract executed on January 25, 2022.

The historical use of the site is an oil field. Two previously abandoned oil wells, associated piping and oil well sumps are located onsite.

The objectives of this baseline human health risk assessment are to evaluate potential health risks to human receptors posed by concentrations of constituents detected at least one time in the soil matrix and soil vapor underlying the

0.55-acre property, and (2) to determine mitigation measures protective of human health for the proposed residential development.

This baseline human health risk assessment followed the guidance in the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) guidance manual (DTSC 2015), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual (RAGs) (USEPA 2004), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part F, Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment) (USEPA 2009), the DTSC Guidance for the Evaluation and Mitigation of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air (DTSC, October 2011), the DRAFT DTSC Supplemental Guidance: Screening and Evaluating Vapor Intrusion (DTSC, February 2020), the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB) Environmental Screening Levels (ESL) model and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Virginia Unified Risk Assessment Model (VURAM) version 3.2.

The results of the baseline human health risk assessment indicate the summed risk of the carcinogenic constituents did exceed the target threshold of 1x10-6 for the residential occupants and did exceed the target threshold of 1x10-5 for construction workers. However, these estimated risks are between 10-6 and one in 10,000 (10-4) which are "safe and protective of public health" (Federal Register 56(20):3535, 1991) within a risk range acceptable to DTSC (February 2020).

The estimated risk for the commercial worker scenario did not exceed the target threshold of 1x10-5.

The results of the human health risk assessment indicate that the estimated summed hazard index of the noncarcinogenic constituents did exceed the target hazard threshold of 1 for the construction worker scenario. 79 80

HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 i Mearns Consulting LLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3

2.0 SITE BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 4

3.0 SUMMARY OF FIELD ACTIVITIES ......................................................................... 5

3.1 Site Geology ........................................................................................................... 6

3.2 Soil Matrix Analytical Results ................................................................................ 6

3.3 Soil Vapor Analytical Results................................................................................. 6

3.4 Conclusions and Recommendations ....................................................................... 6

4.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL .................................................................................... 7

5.0 IDENTIFYING CHEMICALS OF CONCERN ........................................................... 8

6.0 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................... 9

7.0 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 10

7.1 Average and Reasonable Maximum Exposures.................................................... 10

8.0 RISK CHARACTERIZATION .................................................................................. 11

8.1 Ingestion and Dermal Contact Exposure Pathways .............................................. 11

8.2 Inhalation Pathway Soil Matrix ............................................................................ 12

8.3 SFRWQCB ESL Model ........................................................................................ 13

8.4 VURAM Model .................................................................................................... 13

8.5 Noncancer Adverse Health Effects ....................................................................... 14

8.6 Lifetime Excess Cancer Risk ................................................................................ 14

8.7 Multipathway Cancer Risk ................................................................................... 14

8.8 Estimation of Risks and Hazards .......................................................................... 15

9.0 MITIGATION MEASURES ....................................................................................... 17

10.0 UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 18

10.1 Data Collection and Evaluation .......................................................................... 18

10.2 Exposure Assessment ......................................................................................... 18

10.2.1 Exposure Pathways .......................................................................................... 18

10.3 Toxicity Assessment ........................................................................................... 19

10.4 Risk Characterization .......................................................................................... 19

10.5 Summary of Risk Assessment Uncertainties ...................................................... 19

11.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 20 81 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 ii Mearns Consulting LLC
TABLES
Table 1 - Metals and Carbon Chains Analytical Results in Soil Matrix Table 2 - Background Metals Analytical Results in Soil Matrix Table 3 - VOCs Analytical Results in Soil Matrix
Table 4 - Soil Vapor Analytical Results
Table 5 - EPCs, Slope Factors, Reference Doses
Table 6 - Exposure Parameters
Table 7 - Estimated Risks and Hazards - Residential Scenario Table 8 - Estimated Risks and Hazards - Commercial Scenario Table 9 - Estimated Risks and Hazards - Construction Scenario Table 10 - Summed Estimated Risks and Hazards

FIGURES
Figure 1 - Site Location
Figure 2 - Site Map
Figure 3 – Soil Sampling Locations
Figure 4 – Step-out Sampling Locations
Figure 5 – Proposed Excavation
Figure 6 – Site Plan
Figure 7 – Location of Oil Wells
Figure 8 - Conceptual Site Model

APPENDICES
Appendix A – Jones Environmental, Inc. 2021 Soil Matrix Analytical Data Appendix B - Sierra Analytical Labs, Inc. April 2005 & July 2021 Background Metals Analytical Data
Appendix C - Jones Environmental, Inc. 2021 Soil Vapor Data Appendix D- Boring Logs
Appendix E - Metals Statistical Analyses
Appendix F - ProUCL Statistical Analyses
Appendix G - ESL Model Results Soil Vapor - Residential Appendix H - ESL Model Results Soil Vapor - Commercial
Appendix I - VURAM
82 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 1 Mearns Consulting LLC

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The 0.55–acre site located at 1933 Temple Avenue in Signal Hill, Los Angeles County, California 90755 has two previously abandoned oil wells, historic sumps and inoperable pipelines associated with these oil wells in addition to historic automotive repair. Currently the site has a garage and two metal structures onsite. Portions of the site are paved and portions are unpaved. The proposed redevelopment is eight single family residences.

The objectives of this baseline human health risk assessment are: (1) to evaluate potential health risks to human receptors posed by concentrations of constituents detected at least one time in the soil matrix and soil vapor underlying the 0.55-acre property, and (2) to determine mitigation measures protective of human health for the proposed residential development.

This baseline human health risk assessment followed the guidance in the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) guidance manual (DTSC 2015), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual (RAGs) (USEPA 2004), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part F, Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment) (USEPA 2009), the DTSC Guidance for the Evaluation and Mitigation of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air (DTSC, October 2011), the DRAFT DTSC Supplemental Guidance: Screening and Evaluating Vapor Intrusion (DTSC, February 2020), the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB) Environmental Screening Levels (ESL) model and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Virginia Unified Risk Assessment Model version 3.2 (VURAM).

The results of the human health risk assessment indicate the summed risk of the carcinogenic constituents exceeded the target threshold of 1x10-6 for the residential occupants and exceeded the target threshold of 1x10-5 for the construction worker scenario. However, these estimated risks are between 10-6 and one in 10,000 (10-4) which are "safe and protective of public health" (Federal Register 56(20):3535, 1991) and within a risk range acceptable to DTSC (February 2020).

The results of the human health risk assessment indicate that the estimated summed hazard index of the noncarcinogenic constituents exceeded the target hazard threshold of 1 for the construction worker scenarios.

The estimated risk for the commercial worker scenario did not exceed the target threshold of 1x10-5 .

A methane assessment of the 0.55-acre site was performed in August 2021 in accordance with the City of Signal Hill Oil and Gas Code §16.24.080, City of Signal Hill Project Development Guide (June 20, 2017), the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) published, Site Testing Standards for Methane (Reference No. 91.7104.1, Document No. P/BC 2002- 101), effective 11/30/04, and the DTSC Methane Advisories (2005 and 2012). Methane was not detected in the field in soil vapor probes at 5-ft, 10-ft, 15-ft and 20-ft bgs.

Methane was detected in one of two soil vapor samples collected from 20-ft bgs and submitted to the Eurofins stationary laboratory at a concentration of 3.1 parts per million by volume (ppmv) at B10. 83 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 2 Mearns Consulting LLC
Methane mitigation subslab of proposed buildings is recommended (DL Science, Inc. August 26, 2021).

The methane mitigation system should consist of a subslab impervious membrane placed inbetween geotextile or geocloth to protect it from sand above and the 4” thick gravel blanket below in conformance with the City of Signal Hill Oil and Gas Code §16.24.080 and City of Signal Hill Project Development Guide (June 20, 2017). Perforated horizontal vent pipes should be placed in the 4” thick gravel blanket and tied into vertical vent risers (typically cast iron) placed inbetween the interior and exterior walls, less than 100-feet apart, extending a minimum of 3-feet above the roof line and should not terminate less than 100- feet from any opening (City of Signal Hill June 2020).

Although designed to capture and vent methane to the atmosphere, other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface (both in the soil matrix and soil vapor) also will be captured and vented by this system.

Conclusions and Recommendations – A potential future use of the site is residential. The residual concentrations of tetrachloroethene detected in the soil vapor and hexavalent chromium in the soil matrix pose an adverse impact to future residential occupants due to inhalation routes of exposure. The residual concentration of carbon chains C13-C22, cadmium and hexavalent chromium in the soil matrix poses an adverse impact to construction workers due to the inhalation route of exposure to particulates.

The previously abandoned oil wells should be located, daylighted and methane gas leak tested prior to the installation of vent cones and vent risers pursuant to the City of Signal Hill’s Oil and Gas Code §16.24.030 and §16.24.040.

Institutional controls, i.e., a methane mitigation system to be installed subslab of any proposed buildings, pursuant to the City of Signal Hill’s Oil and Gas Code §16.24.080 will effectively mitigate risks and hazards due to vapor intrusion to negligible conditions ensuring the site is safe for any future intended use including as a residential property. A redeveloped property precludes exposure to site soils by future residential occupants.

A soil management plan should be prepared prior to any grading activities to be conducted onsite. This soil management plan should provide instructions for the contractor to implement in the event discolored or odiferous soils are discovered during any grading operations. A R1166 permit should be obtained from the AQMD due to the presence of volatiles onsite prior to the start of grading operations.

Additionally, construction workers are advised to practice good hygiene and wash their hands prior to smoking or eating or drinking pursuant to 29CFR 1926.1910, 8CCR 4 and 22CCR 2.4 to mitigate contact with soils containing residual concentrations of constituents assessed. 84 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 3 Mearns Consulting LLC

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a baseline Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) for the 0.55–acre site located at 1933 Temple Avenue, in Signal Hill, Los Angeles County, California 90755 (the site) (Figures 1 and 2).

The purpose of this human health risk assessment is to evaluate the potential adverse health impacts due to exposure to concentrations of constituents detected in the soil matrix and soil vapor underlying the site. If a constituent was detected one time in soil sampled at 5-ft, 10-ft, 15-ft, or the boring terminus, and/or one time in soil vapor at 5-ft, 10-ft or 15-ft bgs it was retained and quantitatively assessed in this human health risk assessment.

This baseline human health risk assessment followed the guidance in the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) guidance manual (DTSC 2015), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual (RAGs) (USEPA 2004), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part F, Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment) (USEPA 2009), the DTSC Guidance for the Evaluation and Mitigation of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air (DTSC, October 2011), the DRAFT DTSC Supplemental Guidance: Screening and Evaluating Vapor Intrusion (DTSC, February 2020), the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB) Environmental Screening Levels (ESL) model and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Virginia Unified Risk Assessment Model version 3.2 (VURAM).
85 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 4 Mearns Consulting LLC

2.0 SITE BACKGROUND
The 0.55-acre site has been an oil field since at least 1928. Historically, the site had oil derricks, sumps and pipelines.

The site is bounded to north, south and west by apartments and condominiums in Signal Hill, California 90755 (Figures 1 and 2). The Los Angeles County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers for the site are 7216-021- 002 and 7216-021-011.

Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in 2015.

The Phase I ESA had the following conclusions:
x The historical use of the site is an oil field. There are 2 previously abandoned oil wells onsite.

Various automobile repair, boat servicing, cabinet shops and small commercial/industrial businesses occupied the site from the 1940’s through the 1950’s. x Recognized Environmental Conditions onsite include: (1) the previously abandoned oil wells, (2) historic sumps associated with the previously abandoned oil wells, (3) historic pipelines associated with the previously abandoned oil wells, and (4) potential residual contamination from the automotive repairs are Recognized Environmental Conditions. x The adjacent properties include an oilfield and multifamily residences. The adjacent oilfield and operating units are Potential Recognized Environmental Conditions that may impact the site. 86 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 5 Mearns Consulting LLC

3.0 SUMMARY OF FIELD ACTIVITIES
Pursuant to the City of Signal Hill Project Development Guide (2020) DL Science, Inc. performed a Subsurface Soil and Methane/Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Soil Gas Investigation, in essence a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Phase II ESA) for the site in August 2021.

Soil matrix samples were collected at 5-ft, 10-ft and 15-ft bgs from 8 locations (Figure 3). A truck mounted direct push rig was used to collect the soil samples. The sampling system was appropriately cleaned between each borehole; rinsate from cleaning was appropriately disposed. Soil was collected in acetate sleeves with Teflon liners and end caps with minimal headspace.

Thirty-two soil samples were logged onto a chain-of-custody form and stored in a cooler at 4oC until delivered to Jones Environmental, Inc (Jones). Analyses requested were carbon chain ranges C4-C12, C13-C23, C23-C40 via USEPA method 8015M, total threshold limit concentration (TTLC) metals and hexavalent chromium via USEPA methods 6010B/7471, volatile organic compounds via USEPA 8260B, collected via USEPA 5035B in the field using Terra Core sample containers and semi-volatile organic compounds via USEPA 8270C. Jones subcontracted the hexavalent chromium analyses to SunStar Laboratories, Inc. Soil matrix analytical results are included as Appendix A.

These soil borings were then developed as triple-nested soil vapor probes at 5-feet, 10-feet and 15-feet bgs. Soil gas samples were collected in general accordance with the July 2015 DTSC and LARWQCB “Advisory – Active Soil Gas Investigations.”
Twenty-two soil vapor samples, including two duplicates, were collected from these soil vapor probes by a Jones Environmental, Inc. (ELAP 2882) chemist and analyzed in mobile and stationary laboratories in August 2021. Soil vapor analytical results are included as Appendix B.

Due to an elevated concentration of mercury at B10 at 5-feet bgs, DL Science, Inc. performed step-out soil matrix sampling in October 2021. Soil matrix samples were collected from 5-feet, 10-feet, 15-feet and 20-feet bgs from four locations (Figure 4) and submitted for mercury analysis to Jones. DL Science concluded the vertical and lateral extent of soil matrix impacts due to mercury were delineated and recommended a hot spot excavation and offsite disposal.

DL Science, Inc. oversaw a hotspot remedial effort in December 2021 at B10 (Figure 5). Confirmation soil matrix samples were collected from the base and sidewalls at 5-feet bgs. An additional 9 cubic yards of soil was excavated from the base, north and south sidewalls for offsite disposal based on the confirmation analytical results. New confirmation soil matrix samples were collected and analyzed. Based on these results an additional 9 cubic yards of soil was excavated from the south sidewall of the excavation, for a total of 44 cubic yards. The final confirmation soil matrix samples indicate residual concentrations of mercury of 0.935 mg/kg.

Soil matrix samples were collected from Spud Field, 1905 East 21st Street, in Signal Hill, California in April 2005 and July 2021 and analyzed for TTLC metals including hexavalent chromium. The analytical data was used as Signal Hill specific background metal concentrations in two-way statistical analyses to prove the Null Hypothesis, i.e., the sample population of metals concentrations onsite is less than or equal to the sample population representative of background. These background metals analytical results are included as Appendix C.
87 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 6 Mearns Consulting LLC

3.1 Site Geology – DL Science, Inc. reported soil was very fine grained, sand or sandy silt with no discoloration or staining. No groundwater was detected in any soil boring. Boring logs are included as Appendix D.

3.2 Soil Matrix Analytical Results – Carbon chains C13-C22 were detected 3 times and the greatest detected concentration was 282 mg/kg. Carbon chains C23-C40 were detected 5 times and the greatest detected concentration was 920 mg/kg (Table 1).

The following metals were detected in concentrations greater than their respective reporting limits: barium, cadmium, cobalt, trivalent chromium, hexavalent chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium and zinc (Table 1).

The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) benzene and toluene were detected in concentrations greater than their respective reporting limits (Table 3).

Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) were not detected in concentrations greater than the reporting limit.

3.3 Soil Vapor Analytical Results – The VOCs, tetrachloroethene, toluene and total xylenes were detected in concentrations greater than their respective reporting limits in the vapor phase (Table 4).

Tetrachloroethene was detected at concentrations that exceeded the screening threshold.

3.4 Conclusions and Recommendations
Carbon chains, C13-C22 and C23-C40, metals and VOCs were detected in the soil matrix. Three volatile organic compounds were detected in the vapor phase in soil vapor underlying the site. Tetrachloroethene in the vapor phase was detected at concentrations that exceeded the screening threshold.

As the proposed future development for the site is residential, a baseline human health risk assessment is warranted based on the results of this Phase II ESA. The human health risk assessment should include an evaluation of potential health impacts to future residential, commercial and construction workers. 88 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 7 Mearns Consulting LLC

4.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
A conceptual site model was developed to identify the potential complete exposure pathways by which constituents detected in soil could impact human health (Figure 8).

The conceptual site model identifies potential sources, environmental release mechanisms, potential migration pathways, potential exposure pathways, potential exposure routes and potential human receptors onsite.

The conceptual site model identified the following potential complete exposure pathways:
x Future onsite resident

1. ingestion/dermal contact with surface soil

2. inhalation of constituents from surface soil entrained in dust

3. inhalation of VOCs from soil vapor in surface and subsurface soil that have migrated to indoor air
x Future commercial building occupant

1. ingestion/dermal contact with surface soil

2. inhalation of constituents from surface soil entrained in dust

3. inhalation of VOCs from soil vapor in surface and subsurface soil that have migrated to indoor air
x Future construction worker

1. ingestion/dermal contact with surface soil

2. inhalation of constituents from surface and subsurface soil entrained in dust

3. inhalation of VOCs from soil vapor in surface and subsurface soil that have migrated to outdoor air, including trenches
Consumption of fruit or vegetables grown in soil is not considered to be a complete potential exposure pathway under future site conditions.

Potential direct exposures (ingestion and dermal contact) to groundwater are not complete pathways as drinking water is provided by a remote municipal water supply, so there is little chance of incidental exposure. Discharge of groundwater to surface water also is not considered to be a complete migration pathway since there are no surface water bodies that are recharged by artesian flow or groundwater seepage in the vicinity of the site.

The potential for chemicals in soil to leach to underlying groundwater used as a drinking water source is considered very low as several aquitards or aquicludes exist below the maximum depth of impacted soils and groundwater used as a drinking water source.

There is very limited ecological habitat at and near the site. Wetlands were not observed onsite or at adjacent sites. There are no natural or undisturbed areas onsite. Based on the lack of viable ecological habitat at and near the site, there are no complete ecological pathways onsite. 89 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 8 Mearns Consulting LLC

5.0 IDENTIFYING CHEMICALS OF CONCERN
All constituents detected at least one time in the soil matrix and in soil vapor underlying the site were quantitatively assessed using the appropriate exposure pathway in this risk assessment.

Pursuant to the following guidance documents, Selecting Inorganic Constituents as Chemicals of Concern for Risk Assessments at Hazardous Waste Sites and Permitted Facilities (DTSC 1997), Background Metals at Los Angeles Unified School Sites – Arsenic (DTSC 2005) and Arsenic Strategies, Determination of Arsenic Remediation, Development of Arsenic Cleanup Goals (DTSC 2009) the following statistical tests:
(a) Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, (b) Gehan, (c) Tarone-Ware, (d) Multiple Box Plots, (e) Multiple Histograms and (f) Q-Q Plots, were used to determine whether detected concentrations of metals in the soil matrix onsite were within background concentrations. The results of these statistical analyses are included as Appendix E.

These two sample hypotheses tests with non-detects are based on the null hypothesis. The Null hypothesis tests whether the mean and median of the concentrations of each metal detected in onsite soils are less than or equal to the mean and median concentrations of the concentrations of the same metal detected in offsite or background soil samples.

The alternative hypothesis tested was whether the mean and median of the concentrations of detected metals in soils onsite are greater than the mean and median concentrations of the concentrations of the same metals in offsite or background soil samples.

The graphs (1) Multiple Box Plots, (2) Multiple Histograms and (3) Q-Q Plots with non-detects visually indicate whether the detected concentrations of metals in onsite soils are within the population of background metals.

The conclusion based on these quantitative statistical tests was all detected concentrations of metals onsite were within the background population. Cadmium, hexavalent chromium and mercury were not detected in the background samples; therefore, these metals were quantitatively assessed in the human health risk assessment via the ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation routes of exposure.

The maximum concentration of lead in the soil matrix, 57.8 mg/kg, is less than the threshold of 80 mg/kg; therefore, lead was not quantitatively assessed using the LeadSpread 8.0 model.

Chemicals of concern quantitatively assessed in the risk assessment include: C13-C22, C23- C40, benzene, toluene, cadmium, hexavalent chromium and mercury in the soil matrix; tetrachloroethylene (PCE), toluene and total xylenes in the vapor phase via either or both the SFRWQCB ESL model or the Virginia DEQ VURAM model version 3.2.
90 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 9 Mearns Consulting LLC

6.0 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT
Toxicity values are combined with exposure factors to estimate noncancer adverse health effects and cancer risks. Toxicity values include reference doses (RfDs), reference concentrations (RfCs), unit risk factors (URFs) and slope factors (SFs) that are used to evaluate noncancer adverse health effects and cancer risks.

The State of California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Office of Human and Ecological Risk (HERO) have developed URFs SFs, RfCs and RfDs. Pursuant to regulatory agency guidance OEHHA's and HERO’s values are preferentially used instead of USEPA's when available, as OEHHA’s and HERO’s values are generally more conservative than USEPA’s (DTSC 2015, USEPA 2004).

If a constituent had both a risk factor and a reference concentration it was assessed as a carcinogen and as a noncarcinogen. The unit risk factors and reference concentrations were obtained from DTSC HERO (DTSC 2020), ATSDR, IRIS, OEHHA, PPRTV as listed in USEPA’s Regional Screening Levels (November 2021) and DTSC’s HERO Note 10 (February 2019).

The exposure point concentrations, the slope factors and reference doses for the constituents detected in the soil matrix and quantitatively assessed are presented in Table 5. 91 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 10 Mearns Consulting LLC

7.0 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
The exposure assessment provides a scientifically defensible basis for the identification of potentially exposed human receptors and the most likely ways they might be exposed to chemicals of concern at the site. As defined by USEPA (1989), the following four components are necessary for chemical exposure to occur:
x A chemical source and a mechanism of chemical release to the environment x An environmental transport medium (e.g., soil) for the released chemical x A point of contact between the contaminated medium and the receptor (i.e., the exposure point)
x An exposure route (e.g., ingesting chemically-impacted soil) at the exposure point All four of these elements must be present for an exposure pathway to be considered complete and for chemical exposure to occur (USEPA 1989).

This HHRA evaluated the potential for receptors to be exposed to the maximum detected concentrations of the constituents detected in the top 15-ft of soil. The ProUCL model output is included as Appendix F.

The maximum concentrations of the VOCs detected in soil vapor at 5-ft or 15-ft underlying the site were used as the exposure point concentrations in the SFRWQCB ESL vapor intrusion model. Data collected from the soil matrix and soil vapor investigation in 2021 were used in the risk assessment. Exposure point concentrations are presented in Table 6.

7.1 Average and Reasonable Maximum Exposures - Typically two types of exposure scenarios are evaluated in a risk assessment; an average exposure scenario, and a reasonable maximum exposure (RME) scenario. The average exposure scenario represents a more typical exposure, believed to be most likely to occur, while the reasonable maximum exposure scenario represents a plausible worst case situation - one that is not very likely to occur. USEPA guidance (1989) recommends evaluating a reasonable maximum exposure scenario. The reasonable maximum exposure scenario estimates the exposure a receptor might receive using highly conservative intake assumptions (e.g., 90th or 95th percentile for most intake assumptions) and the upper confidence limit (UCL) on the mean of the chemical concentrations. It is assumed that by evaluating a reasonable maximum exposure scenario potential health risks to extremely sensitive individuals within a particular receptor population will be adequately addressed. As an added measure of conservatism, only a reasonable maximum exposure scenario was evaluated in this HHRA.

The DTSC PEA and USEPA guidance contain formulae that incorporate default values which were selected to be health protective. Some of these default values, such as, the exposure frequency, exposure time and exposure duration, were modified when evaluating the commercial worker and construction worker scenarios (DTSC 2015, USEPA 2004).
92 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 11 Mearns Consulting LLC

8.0 RISK CHARACTERIZATION
The risk characterization process incorporates data from the exposure and toxicity assessments. The exposure assessment information necessary to estimate risks and hazards includes the estimated chemical intakes, exposure modeling assumptions, and the exposure pathways assumed to contribute to the majority of exposure for each receptor over a given time period (USEPA 1989a). The exposure parameters for assessing the constituents detected in the soil matrix are included as Table 6.

The method by which chemicals with carcinogenic and/or noncarcinogenic effects are evaluated to determine whether they pose a risk or an adverse impact to human health is discussed below, relative to the exposure pathways by which the receptors may be exposed to the exposure point concentrations of the chemicals of concern.

8.1 Ingestion and Dermal Contact Pathways - To provide an evaluation of chronic risk along the ingestion and dermal contact pathways the following equations for risk and hazard were used consistent with PEA guidance (DTSC 2015).

Risksoil = SFo x Cs x IRs, adult x EF x EDadult x 10-6 kg/mg BWadult x AT x EF
+ SFo x Cs x SAadult x AF x ABS x EF x EDadult x 10-6 kg/mg BWadult x AT x EF
+ SFo x Cs x IRs, child x EF x EDchild x 10-6 kg/mg
BWchild x AT x EF
+ SFo x Cs x SAchild x AF x ABS x EF x EDchild x 10-6 kg/mg BWchild x AT x EF
Hazardsoil = (1/RfDo) x Cs x IRs,child x EF x EDchild x 10-6 kg/mg BWchild x AT
+ (1/RfDo) x Cs x SAchild x AF x ABS x EFchild x EDchild x 10-6 kg/mg BWchild x AT
+ (1/RfDo) x Cs x IRs,adult x EF x EDadult x 10-6 kg/mg BWadult x AT
+ (1/RfDo) x Cs x SAadult x AF x ABS x EFadult x EDadult x 10-6 kg/mg BWadult x AT
Where:

SFo = cancer slope factor (mg/kg-day) -1
Cs = concentration in soil (mg/kg)
RfDo = oral reference dose (mg/kg-day)
93 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 12 Mearns Consulting LLC
ABS = absorption fraction (dimensionless)
ED = exposure duration (years)
EF = exposure frequency (days/year)
BW = body weight (kg)
IRs = incidental soil ingestion rate (mg/day)
SA = skin surface area (cm2
/event)
AF = soil to skin adherence factor (mg/cm2
)
AT = averaging time (days)
Chemical specific values for the absorption fractions (ABS) parameter were obtained from USEPA and DTSC (USEPA November 2021; DTSC May 2020). Toxicity and exposure point concentrations are found in Table 5. Exposure parameters for assessing constituents detected in the soil matrix are presented in Table 6. The maximum concentration of the constituents detected in the top 15-ft of soils were evaluated in this risk assessment for the residential, commercial worker and construction worker scenarios.

The exposure factors presented in Tables 5 and 6 provide a conservative estimate of chronic risk and hazard to human health due to exposure to the chemicals of concern detected in the soil matrix via the ingestion and dermal contact routes of exposure. The calculated estimates of risk and hazard due to exposure to constituents detected in the soil matrix are provided in Tables 7-10.

8.2 Inhalation Pathway Soil Matrix - To provide an evaluation of chronic risk along the inhalation pathway the following equations (DTSC 2015, USEPA 2009) for estimating risk and hazard due to exposure to constituents of concern detected in the soil matrix were used consistent with PEA guidance (DTSC 2015, USEPA 2009).

Semi-volatile organic compounds and metals in soil are evaluated in outdoor air using particulate emission factors (PEFs) to obtain concentrations of chemicals in dust. PEFs are used to develop an estimate of the concentration of a chemical in dust based on its concentration in soil. It assumes that the dust from the site is caused by the wind and not created by mechanical means (e.g. construction activities, tilling, automobile traffic, etc.) (DTSC 2015).

A default PEF of 1.36E+09 (m3
/kg) is used for the residential and commercial worker scenarios, and a PEF of 1.00E+06 is used for the construction worker scenario (DTSC 2015, USEPA 2009). It assumes an infinite source of chemicals, a vegetative cover of 50%, and a mean annual wind speed of 4.69 m/s. This is equivalent to a dust concentration of 0.76 g/m3 at the receptor. The default dispersion term (Q/C) of

90.80 (g/m2-s per kg/m3) is based on a site of 0.5 acres and dispersion modeling runs of 29 sites across the United States. The default Q/C provides a conservative estimate of the long-term exposure to dust (DTSC 2015).

Ca = (Cs/PEF) x 1000µg/mg
Where:

Ca = concentration in air, µg/m3
Cs = concentration in soil, mg/kg
PEF = particulate emission factor
94 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 13 Mearns Consulting LLC
Riskair = IUR x Ca x ET x EF x ED
AT
Hazardair = (1/RfC) x Ca x ET x EF x ED
AT
Where:

IUR = inhalation unit risk factor (µg/m3
)
-1
RfC = reference concentration (µg/m3)
Ca = contaminant concentration in air (µg/m3
)
ET = exposure time (hours/day)
EF = exposure frequency (days/year)
ED = exposure duration (years)
AT = averaging time (hours)
The risk and hazard for the air pathway are based on either the exposure to volatile emissions for VOCs or the exposure to fugitive dust emissions for non-VOCs. The Office of Scientific Affairs defines a VOC as a chemical with a vapor pressure of 0.001 mm mercury or higher and a Henry’s Law Constant of 1 x 10-5 or higher. Exposure to a chemical via the air pathway can be adequately performed using either volatilization or fugitive dust scenarios; it is not necessary to do both (DTSC 2015).

For this risk assessment exposure to non-VOCs detected in the soil matrix via the inhalation pathway was performed using the fugitive dust scenario.

8.3 SFRWQCB ESL Vapor Intrusion Model - The SFRWQCB Environmental Screening Levels vapor intrusion model (2019, Rev. 2) was used to estimate potential risk and hazard due to exposure to volatiles in soil vapor in shallow soil (10-feet bgs or less) and in deeper soil (greater than 10-feet bgs).

The maximum detected concentration was used as the exposure point concentration in this vapor intrusion model. Those chemicals of concern that had both reference doses and slope factors available were assessed as both noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic compounds.

The results of the vapor intrusion risk assessment due to exposure to carcinogenic VOCs in both shallow and deep soil are:

Residential Commercial
Ø5LVN 2.10E-06 4.80E-07
Hazard Index 0.04 0.008
The model results are included on Tables 7 and 8 and in Appendices G and H.

8.4 VURAM - The Virginia Unified Risk Assessment Model version 3.2 (VURAM) was used to estimate the potential risks and hazards due to inhalation of VOCs by construction workers while working in a trench. The maximum detected concentrations of the volatiles detected in soil vapor were used as the exposure point concentrations in VURAM.

The results of the vapor intrusion risk assessment due to exposure to volatiles in soil vapor for construction workers exposed in a trench are presented below:
95 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 14 Mearns Consulting LLC
Construction Worker
Ø5LVN 6.86E-11
Hazard Index 0.0006
The VURAM results are included in Table 9 and as Appendix I.

8.5 Noncancer Adverse Health Effects- Noncarcinogenic effects or hazards are typically evaluated by comparing an exposure level over a specified time period (e.g., a lifetime or 25 years), with a reference dose based on a similar time period. Hazard quotient values less than 1 indicate that potential exposures to noncarcinogenic COCs are not expected to result in toxicity (USEPA 1989). Summing the hazard quotient values to derive a hazard index (HI) provides an estimation of the total potential hazard due to a simultaneous exposure to all the noncarcinogenic COCs. However, summing hazard quotient values is not necessary when the chemicals of concern target different organs within the body (USEPA 1989, DTSC 2015). Although the noncarcinogenic chemicals of concern quantitatively assessed in this risk assessment target different organs within the body, the estimated hazard quotients were summed to derive a HI.

8.6 Lifetime Excess Cancer Risk - Slope factors are used to estimate the potential risk associated with exposure to individual COCs. The slope factor is multiplied by the chronic daily intake averaged over 70 years to estimate lifetime excess cancer risk. "Excess" or "incremental" cancer risk represents the probability of an individual developing cancer over a lifetime as a result of chemical exposure, over and above the baseline or "background" cancer risk in the general population. Cancer risks and noncancer health hazards estimated in the HHRA are regarded as estimated or theoretical results developed on the basis of the toxicity factors, chemical fate and transport, exposure assumption, and other inputs previously described. Cancer risks do not represent actual cancer cases in actual people. Rather, risks are calculated on the basis of an entirely hypothetical set of conditions. This assumed "exposure scenario" is developed to protect human health, and is based on standard USEPA and Cal-EPA methods and assumptions.

USEPA characterizes theoretical excess lifetime cancer risks below one in one million (10-6) as not of concern and has stated that risks between 10-6 and one in 10,000 (10-4) are "safe and protective of public health" (Federal Register 56(20):3535, 1991). Remedial action is not generally required by USEPA for sites with a theoretical lifetime excess risk of less than 10-4; whereas the State of California uses a riskmanagement approach (DTSC 2011). The DRAFT guidance indicates DTSC considers the risk range between 10-4 and 10-6 in risk management decisions (DTSC February 2020).

The more stringent target risk of 10-6 is typically applied to residential receptors. To provide perspective, a total theoretical lifetime excess cancer risk of one in 100,000 (10-5) is frequently accepted by Cal-EPA for worker receptors at California sites, and the target risk for chemicals evaluated under State Proposition 65 regulations is 10-5 (22CCR 12703).

8.7 Multipathway Cancer Risk - Based on regulatory guidelines, it is appropriate to combine risk estimates across exposure pathways for a given receptor. At the same time, exposure to multiple carcinogenic COCs is also typically considered to be additive. For exposures to multiple pathways and chemicals, the following equation was used to estimate total theoretical lifetime excess carcinogenic risks:
96 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 15 Mearns Consulting LLC
m n
Total Risk =   CR i,p
p=1 i=1
Where:

Total Risk = Excess cancer risk from exposure to n chemicals via m pathways m = Number of exposure pathways
n = Number of chemicals
CR i,p = Potential cancer risk from exposure to chemical i via pathway p This equation was used to estimate the total potential cancer risks due to exposure to the carcinogenic COCs via the ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation routes of exposure. The estimated risks, total risk, estimated hazards and hazard index are presented in Tables 7-10.

8.8 Estimation of Risks and Hazards
Residential Scenario
ANALYTE RISKo RISKi HAZARDo HAZARDi
Soil
C13-C22 3.31E-01 6.62E-02
C23-C40 1.08E-01
Benzene 1.83E-09 6.82E-12 4.58E-06 9.16E-07
Toluene 7.64E-08 3.05E-09
Cadmium 6.58E-07 9.17E-03 1.83E-01
Chromium+6 2.91E-07 1.45E-06 1.94E-04 1.13E-03
Mercury 2.12E-02 2.20E-02
Soil vapor
Tetrachloroethene 2.10E-06 2.30E-02
Toluene 2.20E-03
Total xylenes 1.10E-02
Sum 2.93E-07 4.21E-06 0.47 0.31
Ø5LVN = 4.56E-06
HI = 0.78
These estimated risk and hazards values are presented in Tables 7 and 10. 97 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 16 Mearns Consulting LLC
Commercial Worker Scenario
ANALYTE RISKo RISKi HAZARDo HAZARDi
Soil
C13-C22 1.11E-01 1.18E-02
C23-C40 3.62E-02
Benzene 6.14E-10 6.74E-12 1.53E-06 1.63E-07
Toluene 2.56E-08 5.45E-10
Cadmium 6.50E-07 1.88E-03 3.27E-02
Chromium+6 6.40E-08 1.43E-06 4.26E-05 2.01E-04
Mercury 4.67E-03 3.92E-03
Soil vapor
Tetrachloroethene 4.80E-07 5.50E-03
Toluene 5.30E-04
Total xylenes 2.60E-03
Sum 6.46E-08 2.56E-06 0.15 0.06
Ø5LVN (-06
HI = 0.21
These estimated risk and hazards values are presented in Tables 8 and 10.

Construction Worker Scenario
ANALYTE RISKo RISKi HAZARDo HAZARDi
Soil
C13-C22 1.63E-02 3.21E+01
C23-C40 5.33E-03
Benzene 9.04E-11 4.52E-10 2.26E-07 4.45E-04
Toluene 3.77E-09 1.48E-06
Cadmium 4.37E-05 2.48E-04 8.89E+01
Chromium+6 8.64E-09 9.60E-05 5.76E-06 5.47E-01
Mercury 6.31E-04 1.07E+01
Soil vapor
Tetrachloroethene 6.86E-11 4.73E-04
Toluene 4.76E-06
Total xylenes 7.76E-05
Sum 8.73E-09 1.40E-04 0.02 0.06
Ø5LVN (-04
HI = 132
These estimated risk and hazards values are presented in Tables 9 and 10. 98 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 17 Mearns Consulting LLC

9.0 MITIGATION MEASURES
Institutional controls, i.e., the required methane mitigation system to be installed subslab of the proposed buildings and paving of surface soils for parking effectively mitigates the risks and hazards to negligible conditions ensuring the site is safe for the future intended use as a residential property.

Methane mitigation subslab of proposed buildings is recommended based on the Methane Assessment (DL Science, Inc. August 26, 2021). The methane mitigation system should consist of a subslab impervious membrane placed inbetween geotextile or geocloth to protect it from sand above and the 4” thick gravel blanket below in conformance with the City of Signal Hill Oil and Gas Code §16.24.080 and City of Signal Hill Project Development Guide (June 2020). Perforated horizontal vent pipes should be placed in the 4” thick gravel blanket and tied into vertical vent risers (typically cast iron) placed inbetween the interior and exterior walls, less than 100-feet apart, extending a minimum of 3-feet above the roof line and should not terminate less than 100-feet from any opening (City of Signal Hill June 2020).

Although designed to capture and vent methane to the atmosphere, other volatile organic compounds in the subsurface (both in the soil matrix and soil vapor) also will be captured and vented by this system.

If an impervious surface paving area is 5,000 square feet or greater and contiguous to the proposed buildings, the paving should have vents spaced less than 100-ft apart consisting of four sided concrete boxes with traffic rated grates and 4” thick gravel blanket at the base. The vents should be designed to prevent surface water infiltration.

A soil management plan should be prepared to provide guidance to building contractors in the event discolored or odiferous soils or soils with elevated VOCs are discovered during onsite excavation and grading activities.

Additionally, construction workers are advised to practice good hygiene and wash their hands prior to smoking or eating or drinking pursuant to 29CFR 1926.1910, 8CCR 4 and 22CCR 2.4 to mitigate contact with soils containing petroleum hydrocarbons.

A Rule 1166 Permit/Compliance Plan should be obtained from the South Coast Air Quality Management District prior to site grading. VOC monitoring under an Air Quality Management District R1166 Permit ensures construction workers are protected from VOCs during earthwork. 99 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 18 Mearns Consulting LLC

10.0 UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS
The uncertainty analysis characterizes the propagated uncertainty in health risk assessments. These uncertainties are driven by variability in:
x The chemical data selection and assumptions used in the models with which concentrations at receptor locations were estimated.
x The variability of receptor intake parameters.
x The accuracy of toxicity values used to characterize exposure, hazards and cancer risks.

Additionally, uncertainties are introduced in the risk assessment when exposures to several substances across multiple pathways are summed.

Quantifying uncertainty is an essential element of the risk assessment process. According to USEPA's Guidance on Risk Characterization for Risk Managers and Risk Assessors, point estimates of risk "do not fully convey the range of information considered and used in developing the assessment" (USEPA 1992).

The following components of the risk assessment process can introduce uncertainties:
x Data Collection and Evaluation
x Exposure Assessment
x Toxicity Assessment
x Risk Characterization

10.1 Data Collection and Evaluation - The techniques used for data sampling and analysis and the methods used for identifying chemicals for evaluation in this risk assessment, may result in a number of uncertainties. These uncertainties are itemized below in the form of assumptions. x It was assumed that the nature and extent of chemical impacts on and near the site have been adequately characterized. If this assumption is not valid, then potential health impacts may be over- or underestimated.
x Systematic or random errors in the chemical analyses may yield erroneous data. These types of errors may result in a slight over- or underestimation of risk.

10.2 Exposure Assessment - A number of uncertainties are associated with the exposure assessment, including estimation of exposure point concentrations and assumptions used to estimate chemical intakes.

Key uncertainties associated with these components of the HHRA are summarized below.

10.2.1 Exposure Pathways - The exposure pathways evaluated in this HHRA are expected to represent the primary pathways of exposure, based on the results of the chemical analyses, and the expected fate and transport of these chemicals in the environment. Minor or secondary pathways may also exist, but often cannot be identified or evaluated using the available data. The contribution of secondary pathways to the overall risk from the site is not likely to be significant. In addition, intake assumptions are reflective of trends (usually for the most sensitive individual within an entire population), and as such are subject to intrinsic variability. In both cases, their presence introduces a level of uncertainty to this risk assessment process.
100

HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 19 Mearns Consulting LLC

10.3 Toxicity Assessment - Toxicity information for many chemicals is often limited. Consequently, there are varying degrees of uncertainty with the calculated toxicity values. Sources of uncertainty associated with toxicity values include:
x Using dose-response information from effects observed at high doses to predict the adverse health effects that may occur following exposure to the low levels expected from human contact with the agent in the environment.
x Using dose-response information from short-term exposures to predict the effects of longterm exposures. x Using dose-response information from animal studies to predict effects in humans. x Using dose-response information from homogeneous animal populations or human populations to predict the effects likely to be observed in the general population consisting of individuals with a wide range of sensitivities.

To compensate for these uncertainties, USEPA typically applies a margin of safety when promulgating human toxicity values. Therefore, use of USEPA toxicity values likely results in an overestimation of potential hazard and risk.

10.4 Risk Characterization - The reasonable maximum exposure scenario risk characterization represents an over-estimation of risk. Site-specific information regarding depth below ground at which the constituents of concern were detected was not used in the equations. The reasonable maximum exposure scenario estimated the risk to the receptors based on the maximum detected concentrations for the constituents quantitatively assessed in this risk assessment.

10.5 Summary of Risk Assessment Uncertainties - The analysis of the uncertainties associated with this risk assessment indicates that the estimated risks and hazards derived from the equations in the PEA Manual (DTSC 2015), the RAGs Manual (USEPA 2009), the LeadSpread Model (DTSC) and the ESL and VURAM vapor intrusion models for the reasonable maximum exposure scenario represent an overestimation of risk. Although as outlined in the sections above, many factors can contribute to the over- or underestimation of risk, in general, a mixture of conservative and upper-bound input values were identified to estimate potential exposures. Compounding conservative and upper-bound input values in the risk assessment process are intended to lead to reasonable, maximum, health-conservative estimates.

The actual impacts to human health are most likely less than those estimated in this HHRA for the evaluated receptors and pathways.
101

HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 20 Mearns Consulting LLC

11.0 REFERENCES
California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal-EPA). 1992. Supplemental Guidance for Human Health Multimedia Risk Assessments of Hazardous Waste Sites and Permitted Facilities.

California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal-EPA) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 1997. Selecting Inorganic Constituents as Chemicals of Potential Concern at Risk Assessments at Hazardous Waste Sites and Permitted Facilities. February 1997.

California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal-EPA) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2005. Final Report, Background Metals at Los Angeles Unified School Sites – Arsenic. June 6, 2005.

California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal-EPA) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2007. Arsenic Strategies, Determination of Arsenic Remediation, Development of Arsenic Cleanup Goals for Proposed and Existing School Sites. March 21, 2007.

California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal-EPA) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2011. Guidance for the Evaluation and Mitigation of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air October 2011.

California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal-EPA) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2015. Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual.

Chernoff, G., W. Bosan and D. Oudiz. Determination of a Southern California Regional Background Arsenic Concentration in Soil.

DL Science, Inc. August 26, 2021. Summary Report for Subsurface Soil and Methane/Volatile Organic Compounds Soil Gas Investigation at Proposed New Multi-Unit Residential Site, 1933 Temple Ave., Signal Hill, California (90755).

DL Science, Inc. October 30, 2021. Summary Report for Additional Soil Investigation Services at Proposed New Multi-Unit Residential Site, 1933 Temple Ave., Signal Hill, California (90755).

DL Science, Inc. January 2, 2022. Summary Report for Consulting Services, Remedial Soil Excavation for Mercury-Impacted Soil at 1933 Temple Ave., Signal Hill, California (90755).

DTSC Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) Note Number

3. June 2020.

DTSC HERO Human Health Risk Assessment Note Number 10. February 2019. DTSC’s LeadSpread 8.0 Model.

Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. December 22, 2015. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, 1933 Temple Ave., Signal Hill, CA. 90755.

USEPA. November 2021. Regional Screening Levels.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). July, 1996. Soil Screening Guidance: User's Guide. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Publication 9355.4-23. 102

HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, California 90755
February 16, 2022 21 Mearns Consulting LLC
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). December, 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGs), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA/540/1-9/002.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I - Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B, Development of Risk-Based Preliminary Remediation Goals). Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Publication 9285.7-01B.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2009. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I - Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part F, Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment).

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). April, 2004.

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Virginia Unified Risk Assessment Model (VURAM), version 3.2, January 2022.

ProUCL Guidance. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ProUCL version 5.1.02 103
7$%/(6
104
7DEOH0HWDOVDQG&DUERQ&KDLQV$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWVLQ6RLO0DWUL[ 6$03/(
,'
'$7(
6$03/('
$V
PJNJ
%D
PJNJ
&G
PJNJ
&R
PJNJ
&U
PJNJ
&U
PJNJ
&X
PJNJ
+J
PJNJ
1L
PJNJ
3E
PJNJ
9 PJNJ
=Q
PJNJ
&&
PJNJ
&&
PJNJ
&&
PJNJ
56/r          
  
 
'76&6/r        

 
56/i               '76&6/i           (6/7LHU  
 
        
%                 %       
 
      %                 %   
              %    
 
 
       %            
    
%       
  

 
   
%     
     
    %                 %     
 
        
%         

   
  %   
 
  
    
  
%   
             %   
  
  
   
    %     
       
  
%               


%       
  
      %                 %      
         
%       
        %                 %                 %       
     
   %      
  
  
   
%
  
        
    
%
                %       
      
  %
     

          %          
  
   

%    
   
   
   %                %      
      

  
1VLGHZDOO  
6VLGHZDOO                
(6LGHZDOO  

:6LGHZDOO  
%RWWRP  
1RWHV
PJNJ PLOOLJUDPSHUNLORJUDP
$V DUVHQLF%D EDULXP&G FDGPLXP&R FREDOW&U WULYDOHQWFKURPLXP&U KH[DYDOHQWFKURPLXP&X FRSSHU+J PHUFXU\1L QLFNHO3E OHDG9 YDQDGLXP=Q ]LQFx  FRQFHQWUDWLRQLVOHVVWKDQWKH5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW x 
LHQRWGHWHFWHG
1'
6% 6RLO%RULQJIHHWEHORZJURXQGVXUIDFH
EJV
%2/' YDOXHH[FHHGVWKH'76&RU86(3$VFUHHQLQJOHYHO$QDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVDUHLQFOXGHGDV$SSHQGL[$6RLOZDVFROOHFWHGIURPIHHWIHHWEJVDQGIHHWEJVIURPWKHVDPHERULQJ%RULQJV DQGZHUHH[WHQGHGWRIHHWEJV
2QO\GHWHFWHGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVRIPHWDOVDUHSUHVHQWHGLQWKLVWDEOH$OORWKHUPHWDOVZHUH1'(6/7LHU 6DQ)UDQFLVFR%D\5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\&RQWURO%RDUG(QYLURQPHQWDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOV 
5HY

56/r 86(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRUUHVLGHQWLDOVRLOV56/i 86(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOVIRULQGXVWULDOVRLOV 1RYHPEHU
'76&6/r &DO(3$'76&6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRUUHVLGHQWLDOVRLOV'76&6/i  &DO(3$'76&6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRULQGXVWULDOVRLOV -XQH

)HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//&
105
7DEOH0HWDOVDQG&DUERQ&KDLQV$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWVLQ6RLO0DWUL[ 6$03/(
,'
'$7(
6$03/('
$V
PJNJ
%D
PJNJ
&G
PJNJ
&R
PJNJ
&U
PJNJ
&U
PJNJ
&X
PJNJ
+J
PJNJ
1L
PJNJ
3E
PJNJ
9 PJNJ
=Q
PJNJ
&&
PJNJ
&&
PJNJ
&&
PJNJ
56/r          
  
 
'76&6/r        

 
56/i               '76&6/i           (6/7LHU  
 
        
FDUFLQRJHQLFYDOXHVZHUHSUHIHUHQWLDOO\XVHGIRUDOOVFUHHQLQJOHYHOVH[FHSWFDGPLXPQLFNHODQG73+'76&6/&&DURPDWLFKLJKDQG86(3$DURPDWLFKLJKYDOXHVZHUHXVHGIRU&&'76&6/& &DURPDWLFPHGLXPDQG86(3$DURPDWLFPHGLXPYDOXHVZHUHXVHGIRU&&%ZDVH[FDYDWHGWRDSSUR[LPDWHO\IHHWEJVDQGWKHVRLODSSURSULDWHO\GLVSRVHGGXHWRWKHHOHYDWHGFRQFHQWUDWLRQRIPHUFXU\VLGHZDOODQGERWWRPVDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHG )HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//&
106
7DEOH%DFNJURXQG0HWDOV$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWVLQ6RLO0DWUL[ 6$03/(
,'
'$7(
6$03/('
$V
PJNJ
%D
PJNJ
&G
PJNJ
&R
PJNJ
&U
PJNJ
&U
PJNJ
&X
PJNJ
+J
PJNJ
1L
PJNJ
3E
PJNJ
9 PJNJ
=Q
PJNJ
56/r          
 
'76&6/r        

56/i            '76&6/i        
(6/7LHU  
 
        
2IIVLWH  
         
2IIVLWH           

2IIVLWH             2IIVLWH            
6%         
   
6%   

    
   
6%     
  
   

6%         

  
6%  
      
   
6%         
   6%          
  6%             
6%
         

 
6%  
      
   

6%    
    
  

1RWHV
PJNJ PLOOLJUDPSHUNLORJUDP
$V DUVHQLF%D EDULXP&G FDGPLXP&R FREDOW&U WULYDOHQWFKURPLXP&U KH[DYDOHQWFKURPLXP&X FRSSHU+J PHUFXU\1L QLFNHO3E OHDG9 YDQDGLXP=Q ]LQFx  FRQFHQWUDWLRQLVOHVVWKDQWKH5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW x
LHQRWGHWHFWHG
1'
6% 6RLO%RULQJIHHWEHORZJURXQGVXUIDFH
EJV
$QDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVDUHLQFOXGHGDV$SSHQGL[%(6/7LHU 6DQ)UDQFLVFR%D\5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\&RQWURO%RDUG(QYLURQPHQWDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOV 
5HY
56/U 86(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRUUHVLGHQWLDOVRLOV56/L 86(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOVIRULQGXVWULDOVRLOV 1RYHPEHU
'76&6/U &DO(3$'76&6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRUUHVLGHQWLDOVRLOV'76&6/L &DO(3$'76&6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRULQGXVWULDOVRLOV -XQH
FDUFLQRJHQLFYDOXHVZHUHSUHIHUHQWLDOO\XVHGIRUDOOVFUHHQLQJOHYHOVH[FHSWQLFNHOKH[DYDOHQWFKURPLXPZDVQRWDQDQDO\WHLQ )HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//&
107
7DEOH92&V$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWVLQ6RLO0DWUL[
6$03/(
,'
'$7(
6$03/('
%HQ]HQH
PJNJ
7ROXHQH
PJNJ
56/r  

'76&6/r  
56/i  
'76&6/i  
(6/7LHU  
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%   
%  

%   
%   
%
   
%
   
%
   
%
   
%   
%   
%   
%   
1RWHV

PJNJ PLOOLJUDPSHUNLORJUDP
x  FRQFHQWUDWLRQLVOHVVWKDQWKH5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW
x 
LHQRWGHWHFWHG
1'

6% 6RLO%RULQJIHHWEHORZJURXQGVXUIDFH
EJV

%2/' YDOXHH[FHHGVWKH'76&RU86(3$VFUHHQLQJOHYHO
$QDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVDUHLQFOXGHGDV$SSHQGL[$
6RLOZDVFROOHFWHGIURPIHHWIHHWEJVDQGIHHWEJVIURPWKHVDPHERULQJ 2QO\GHWHFWHGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVRI92&VDUHSUHVHQWHGLQWKLVWDEOH$OORWKHU92&VZHUH1' (6/7LHU 6DQ)UDQFLVFR%D\5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\&RQWURO%RDUG(QYLURQPHQWDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOV 
5HY

56/r 86(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRUUHVLGHQWLDOVRLOV56/i  86(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOVIRULQGXVWULDOVRLOV

1RYHPEHU

)HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//& 108
7DEOH92&V$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWVLQ6RLO0DWUL[
'76&6/r &DO(3$'76&6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRUUHVLGHQWLDOVRLOV'76&6/i  &DO(3$'76&6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRULQGXVWULDOVRLOV

-XQH

FDUFLQRJHQLFYDOXHVZHUHSUHIHUHQWLDOO\XVHGIRUDOOVFUHHQLQJOHYHOV )HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//& 109
7DEOH6RLO9DSRU$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV
6$03/(
,'
'$7(
6$03/('
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQHóJP

7ROXHQHóJP

PS;\OHQHVóJP

R;\OHQHóJP

56/r    
'76&6/r  
56/i    
'76&6/i  
(6/7LHU    
%     
%     
%     
%     
%     
% 
  
%     
%     
%     
%     
%     
%5(3     
%     
%     
%     
%     
%5(3     
%     
%
     
%
     
%     
%     
1RWHV

JP PLFURJUDPVSHUFXELFPHWHU
x  FRQFHQWUDWLRQLVOHVVWKDQWKH5HSRUWLQJ/LPLWLHQRWGHWHFWHG %2/'H[FHHGVWKHVFUHHQLQJOHYHO
%ODQNFHOOVFUHHQLQJWKUHVKROGQRWDYDLODEOH
$QDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVDUHLQFOXGHGDV$SSHQGL[&
2QO\GHWHFWHGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVRIYRODWLOHVLQWKHYDSRUSKDVHDUHSUHVHQWHGLQWKLVWDEOH 6RLOYDSRUZDVFROOHFWHGIURPGXDOQHVWHGVRLOYDSRUSUREHVLQVWDOOHGDWIHHWEJVDQGIHHWEJV (6/7LHU 6DQ)UDQFLVFR%D\5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\&RQWURO%RDUG(QYLURQPHQWDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOV 
5HY

56/r 86(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRUUHVLGHQWLDODLU56/i  86(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOVIRULQGXVWULDODLU 1RYHPEHU

'76&6/r &DO(3$'76&6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRUUHVLGHQWLDODLU'76&6/i  &DO(3$'76&6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRULQGXVWULDODLU -XQH

)HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//& 110
7DEOH([SRVXUH3RLQW&RQFHQWUDWLRQV6ORSH)DFWRUVDQG5HIHUHQFH'RVHV 62,/0$75,;$1$/<7( 0$;PJNJ
8&/PJNJ 6)R ,85 5I'R 5I&L
&&  (E
(E
&&
  (E
EHQ]HQH 
(D

(D(D(D
WROXHQH  (D
(D
FDGPLXP   (D
(D(D
KH[DYDOHQWFKURPLXP   (D
(D(D(D
PHUFXU\ 
  (D
(D
62,/9$325$1$/<7( 0$;óJP

8&/óJP
WHWUDFKORURHWKHQH  (6/ 985$0PRGHOV (6/ 985$0PRGHOV WROXHQH  (6/ 985$0PRGHOV
PS[\OHQHV  (6/ 985$0PRGHOV
R[\OHQH  (6/ 985$0PRGHOV
1RWHV

8&/FDOFXODWHGXVLQJ3UR8&/YHUVLRQ
(3&VDUHKLJKOLJKWHG
6)R 6ORSH)DFWRURUDOURXWHRIH[SRVXUH
PJNJGD\

,85 LQKDODWLRQXQLWULVNIDFWRULQKDODWLRQURXWHRIH[SRVXUH

JP


5I'R 5HIHUHQFH'RVHRUDOURXWHRIH[SRVXUH
PJNJGD\

5I&L 5HIHUHQFH&RQFHQWUDWLRQLQKDODWLRQURXWHRIH[SRVXUH

JP

D'76&+(521RWH
)HEUXDU\

E86(3$56/WDEOHV
1RYHPEHU

DURPDWLFYDOXHVZHUHXVHGIRUFDUERQFKDLQV
86(3$56/1RYHPEHU

)HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//& 111
7DEOH([SRVXUH3DUDPHWHUV
5HFHSWRU3RSXODWLRQV
&RPPHUFLDO &RQVWUXFWLRQ 5HVLGHQWLDO 8VHU
([SRVXUH3DUDPHWHU 1RWDWLRQ :RUNHU :RUNHU $GXOW &KLOG 8QLWV 5HIHUHQFH *HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV%RG\:HLJKW %:     NJ '76&([SRVXUH'XUDWLRQ ('     \HDUV '76&([SRVXUH)UHTXHQF\ ()     GD\V\HDU '76& ([SRVXUH7LPH (7     KRXUVGD\ '76&
6RLO,QJHVWLRQ3DWKZD\6RLO,QJHVWLRQ5DWH ,5     PJGD\ '76&$YHUDJLQJ7LPHFDUFLQRJHQVG[G\U $WF     GD\V '76& $YHUDJLQJ7LPHQRQFDUFLQRJHQV('[G\U $WQF
   
 GD\V '76&
'HUPDO&RQWDFWZLWK6RLO6NLQ6XUIDFH$UHD 6$      FPHYHQW 2(++$
6RLOWR6NLQ$GKHUHQFHIDFWRU $)     PJFP 2(++$)UDFWLRQRI&KHPLFDO'HUPDOO\$EVRUEHG $%6 FKHPVSHFLILF FKHPVSHFLILF FKVS FKVS XQLWOHVV '76& $YHUDJLQJ7LPHFDUFLQRJHQVG[G\U $WF     GD\V '76& $YHUDJLQJ7LPHQRQFDUFLQRJHQV('[G\U $WQF
   
 GD\V '76&
,QKDODWLRQRI2XWGRRU$LU3DUWLFXODWH(PLVVLRQ)DFWRU 3() ( ( (
(
PNJ '76&
([SRVXUH7LPH
VLWHYLVLWGXUDWLRQ
(7     KRXUVGD\ 86(3$$YHUDJLQJ7LPHFDUFLQRJHQVG[G\U[KUG $WF     KRXUV '76& $YHUDJLQJ7LPHQRQFDUFLQRJHQV('[G\U[KG $WQF 
    KRXUV '76&
1RWHV
$%6 IRU92&VIRUQDSKWKDOHQHIRUPRVWPHWDOV '76&-XQH
86(3$56/1RYHPEHU

)HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//&
112
7DEOH
(VWLPDWHG5LVNVDQG+D]DUGV5HVLGHQWLDO
$1$/<7( 5,6.R 5,6.L +$=$5'R +$=$5'L
VRLO
&& ( (
&& (
EHQ]HQH (
( (
(
WROXHQH ( (

FDGPLXP (
( (
KH[DYDOHQWFKURPLXP 
( ( 
( (
PHUFXU\ ( (
VRLOYDSRU
WHWUDFKORURHWKHQH ( (
WROXHQH (
[\OHQHV (
6XP 
( (  
7RWDO5LVN (
7RWDO+D]DUG 
)HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//& 113
7DEOH
(VWLPDWHG5LVNVDQG+D]DUGV&RPPHUFLDO
$1$/<7( 5,6.R 5,6.L +$=$5'R +$=$5'L
VRLO
&& ( (
&& (
EHQ]HQH ( ( ( (
WROXHQH ( (
FDGPLXP ( ( (
KH[DYDOHQWFKURPLXP ( ( ( ( PHUFXU\ ( 
(
VRLOYDSRU
WHWUDFKORURHWKHQH ( (
WROXHQH (
[\OHQHV (
6XP ( (  
7RWDO5LVN (
7RWDO+D]DUG 
)HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//& 114
7DEOH

(VWLPDWHG5LVNVDQG+D]DUGV&RQVWUXFWLRQ
$1$/<7( 5,6.R 5,6.L +$=$5'R +$=$5'L
VRLO
&& ( (
&& (
EHQ]HQH
( ( ( (
WROXHQH (
(
FDGPLXP ( ( 
(
KH[DYDOHQWFKURPLXP (

( ( (
PHUFXU\ ( (
VRLOYDSRU
WHWUDFKORURHWKHQH ( (
WROXHQH (
[\OHQHV (
6XP (
(  
7RWDO5LVN (
7RWDO+D]DUG 
)HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//& 115
7DEOH
6XPPDU\RI(VWLPDWHG5LVNVDQG+D]DUGV
5HFHSWRU3RSXODWLRQ
5HVLGHQWLDO &RQVWUXFWLRQ &RPPHUFLDO
ô5LVN ( ( (
+D]DUG,QGH[   
1RWHV

5LVN (VWLPDWHGULVNVGXHWRLQJHVWLRQDQGGHUPDOFRQWDFWDQGLQKDODWLRQRIFRQVWLWXHQWVLQVRLODQGVRLOYDSRU +D]DUG,QGH[ (VWLPDWHGKD]DUGVGXHWRLQJHVWLRQDQGGHUPDOFRQWDFWDQGLQKDODWLRQRIFRQVWLWXHQWVLQVRLODQGVRLOYDSRU )HEUXDU\ 0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//& 116
),*85(6
117
118
119
0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//&
)LJXUH
6RLO6DPSOLQJ/RFDWLRQV

7HPSOH$YHQXH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
1  IHHW
%DVHPDS
$QDFDO(QJLQHHULQJ&RPSDQ\
B-2
B-6
B-3 B-4
B-7 B-8 B-10
B-5
B-1 B-9
(;3/$1$7,216RLOVDPSOH
120
121
122
0HDUQV&RQVXOWLQJ//&
)LJXUH
6LWH3ODQ

7HPSOH$YHQXH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
1  IHHW
%DVHPDS
$QDFDO(QJLQHHULQJ&RPSDQ\
123
124
Mearns Consulting LLC
Figure 8: Conceptual Site Model
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, CA
Primary
Sources
Primary
Release
Mechanisms
Secondary
Sources
Transport
Mechanisms
Exposure
Media
Exposure
Routes
Potential Receptors
Residential
Occupational
Construction
and Excavation
Ecological Receptors
• Oil field
• Inoperable pipelines
• Previously
abandoned oil wells
• Historic sumps
• Historic automotive
repair
Surface
soils
Subsurface
soils
Outdoor air
Indoor air
Outdoor air
Indoor air
InhalationInhalationInhalationInhalation
9 9 9
9 9 9
Inhalation
particulates 9 9 9
Volatilization and
migration in soil
gas
Soil
Ingestion 9 9 9
Contact Dermal contact 9 9 9
Volatilization and
migration in soil
gas
Disposal
practices
leaking
125
$33(1',;$
-RQHV(QYLURQPHQWDO/DEV,QF
6XQ6WDU/DERUDWRULHV,QF
6RLO0DWUL['DWD
126
127
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG


3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
&DUERQ&KDLQ5DQJH
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

+H[DFRVDQH     
%DWFK
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
6LJQDO+LOO&$
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
'DYLG//XFHUR
'/6FLHQFH,QF
/$%25$725<5(68/76

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
(3$0([WHQGHG5DQJH+\GURFDUERQV
4&/LPLWV

2 128
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG


3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
&DUERQ&KDLQ5DQJH
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

+H[DFRVDQH    

%DWFK
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$0([WHQGHG5DQJH+\GURFDUERQV

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
'DYLG//XFHUR
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
4&/LPLWV

3 129
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG


3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
&DUERQ&KDLQ5DQJH
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

+H[DFRVDQH 
    
%DWFK
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$0([WHQGHG5DQJH+\GURFDUERQV
'DYLG//XFHUR
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
4&/LPLWV

4 130
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG


3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
&DUERQ&KDLQ5DQJH
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 2.1 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 6.8 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&

16.0 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 72.3 1' 1' 24.7 1'  PJNJ
&& 137 1' 1' 42.0 1'  PJNJ
&& 254 1' 1' 64.1 1'  PJNJ
&& 221 1' 1' 67.4 1'  PJNJ
&&
224 1' 1' 71.4 1'  PJNJ
&& 188 1' 1' 71.1 1'  PJNJ
&& 72.9 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 920 1' 1' 271 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

+H[DFRVDQH 
    
%DWFK
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
B
B
),'
BB
),'
BB
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$0([WHQGHG5DQJH+\GURFDUERQV
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
4&/LPLWV

5 131
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG


3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%
#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
&DUERQ&KDLQ5DQJH
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1.2 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 2.8 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 6.1 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 10.4 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 33.0 1' 1' 11.9  PJNJ
&& 1' 50.5 1' 1' 19.9  PJNJ
&& 1' 78.0 1' 1' 32.4  PJNJ
&& 1' 73.7 1' 1' 32.0  PJNJ
&&
1' 75.4 1' 1' 35.2  PJNJ
&& 1' 72.6 1' 1' 35.7  PJNJ
&& 1' 42.8 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 307 1' 1' 132  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

+H[DFRVDQH    

%DWFK
),'
BB
),'
BB
),'
BB
),'
BB
),'
BB
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$0([WHQGHG5DQJH+\GURFDUERQV
4&/LPLWV

6 132
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG


3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%
#
%
#
%
#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
&DUERQ&KDLQ5DQJH
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 6.5 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 10.8 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 16.5 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 16.3 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1' 1' 18.5 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 19.6 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1' 1' 69.1 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

+H[DFRVDQH 
   

%DWFK
),'
BB
),'
BB
),'
BB
),'
BB
),'
BB
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$0([WHQGHG5DQJH+\GURFDUERQV
4&/LPLWV

7 133
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG


3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
&DUERQ&KDLQ5DQJH
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU  
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

+H[DFRVDQH
 
%DWFK
),'
BB
),'
BB
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
4&/LPLWV

(3$0([WHQGHG5DQJH+\GURFDUERQV
8 134
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG


3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
0(7+2'
%/$1.
0(7+2'
%/$1.
-RQHV,'
0%

),'
0%
),'
&DUERQ&KDLQ5DQJH
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&&
1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
&& 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU  
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

+H[DFRVDQH  
%DWFK
),'
B
B
),'
BB
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
4&/LPLWV

-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
8QLWV
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$0([WHQGHG5DQJH+\GURFDUERQV
9 135
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG


3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
%$7&+
3UHSDUHG

 $QDO\]HG


5HVXOW 6SLNH/HYHO 5HFRYHU\ 53' 5HFRYHU\
/LPLWV 8QLWV
/&6
/&6
),' 6$03/(63,.('
&/($162,/
$QDO\WH

'LHVHO
&&
    PJNJ
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

+H[DFRVDQH  
/&6'
/&6'
),' 6$03/(63,.('
&/($162,/
$QDO\WH

'LHVHO
&&
     PJNJ
+H[DFRVDQH  
&&9
&&9
),'
$QDO\WH

'LHVHO
&&
    PJNJ
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHULHV

(3$0([WHQGHG5DQJH+\GURFDUERQV
-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
),'B
B
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
10 136
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG


3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
%$7&+
3UHSDUHG
 $QDO\]HG

5HVXOW 6SLNH/HYHO 5HFRYHU\ 53' 5HFRYHU\
/LPLWV 8QLWV
/&6
/&6 6$03/(63,.('
&/($162,/
$QDO\WH

'LHVHO
&&
    PJNJ
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

+H[DFRVDQH 
 
/&6'
/&6' 6$03/(63,.('
&/($162,/
$QDO\WH

'LHVHO
&&
     PJNJ
+H[DFRVDQH  
&&9
&&9
$QDO\WH

'LHVHO
&&

 
  PJNJ
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
),'BB
(3$0([WHQGHG5DQJH+\GURFDUERQV
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHULHV

11 137
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

%HQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
VHF%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRHWKDQH
('%
 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 6LJQDO+LOO&$
-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
'DYLG//XFHUR
'/6FLHQFH,QF
12 138
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67

$QDO\WHV

WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OHQHFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
1DSKWKDOHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q3URS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
6W\UHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
9LQ\OFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
PS;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
R;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LLVRSURS\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUWDP\OPHWK\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\ODOFRKRO 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHULHV

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH     
7ROXHQHG}     
%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH
 
 

%DWFK
92&

92&

92&

92&

92&

1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV -21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76

4&/LPLWV


13 139
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

%HQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
VHF%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRHWKDQH
('%
 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'DYLG//XFHUR
-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 
17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
14 140
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67

$QDO\WHV

WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OHQHFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
1DSKWKDOHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q3URS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
6W\UHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
9LQ\OFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
PS;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
R;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LLVRSURS\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUWDP\OPHWK\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\ODOFRKRO 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHULHV

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH     
7ROXHQHG} 
    
%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH 
  
 

%DWFK
92&

92&

92&

92&

92&

1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW



4&/LPLWV
5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV -21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
15 141
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

%HQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
VHF%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRHWKDQH
('%
 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'DYLG//XFHUR
-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 
17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
16 142
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67

$QDO\WHV

WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OHQHFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
1DSKWKDOHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q3URS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
6W\UHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
9LQ\OFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
PS;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
R;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LLVRSURS\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUWDP\OPHWK\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\ODOFRKRO 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHULHV

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH     
7ROXHQHG}
  


%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH
  


%DWFK
92&

92&

92&

92&

92&

1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
4&/LPLWV



-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
17 143
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

%HQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
VHF%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRHWKDQH
('%
 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 18 144
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67

$QDO\WHV

WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OWROXHQH  1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OHQHFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
1DSKWKDOHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q3URS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
6W\UHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
9LQ\OFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
PS;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
R;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LLVRSURS\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUWDP\OPHWK\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\ODOFRKRO 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHULHV

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH     
7ROXHQHG} 




%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH






%DWFK
92&

92&

92&

92&

92&

1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
4&/LPLWV



-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
19 145
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%
#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

%HQ]HQH 1' 
1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
VHF%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRHWKDQH
('%
 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 
17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$

17HPSOH$YH
'DYLG//XFHUR
'/6FLHQFH,QF
-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
20 146
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%
#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67

$QDO\WHV

WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OHQHFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
1DSKWKDOHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q3URS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
6W\UHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ROXHQH 1'  1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
9LQ\OFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
PS;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
R;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LLVRSURS\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUWDP\OPHWK\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\ODOFRKRO 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHULHV

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH     
7ROXHQHG}





%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH

  

%DWFK
92&

92&

92&

92&

92&

1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
4&/LPLWV



-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
21 147
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%
#
%
#
%
#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

%HQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
VHF%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRHWKDQH
('%
 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 
17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$

17HPSOH$YH
'DYLG//XFHUR
'/6FLHQFH,QF
-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
22 148
6DPSOH,'
%
#
%
#
%
#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67

$QDO\WHV

WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OHQHFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
1DSKWKDOHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q3URS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
6W\UHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
9LQ\OFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
PS;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
R;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LLVRSURS\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUWDP\OPHWK\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\ODOFRKRO 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHULHV

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH     
7ROXHQHG} 
 
 

%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH


 

%DWFK
92&

92&

92&

92&

92&

1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
4&/LPLWV



23 149
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

%HQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
VHF%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRHWKDQH
('%
 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 
17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$

17HPSOH$YH
'DYLG//XFHUR
'/6FLHQFH,QF
-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
24 150
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67

$QDO\WHV

WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OHQHFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
1DSKWKDOHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q3URS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
6W\UHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
9LQ\OFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
PS;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
R;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LLVRSURS\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUWDP\OPHWK\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\ODOFRKRO 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHULHV

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH  
7ROXHQHG}  
%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH


%DWFK
92&

92&

1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
4&/LPLWV



-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
25 151
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
0(7+2'
%/$1.
0(7+2'
%/$1.
0(7+2'
%/$1.
0(7+2'
%/$1.
0(7+2'
%/$1.
-RQHV,'

90%

90%

90%

90%
''
,,0%%%
$QDO\WHV

%HQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
%URPRIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
VHF%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURIRUP 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
&KORURWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRHWKDQH
('%
 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LEURPRPHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV -21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
6LJQDO+LOO&$
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
26 152
6DPSOH,'
0(7+2'
%/$1.
0(7+2'
%/$1.
0(7+2'
%/$1.
0(7+2'
%/$1.
0(7+2'
%/$1.
-RQHV,'

90%

90%

90%

90%
''
,,0%%%
$QDO\WHV

WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
)UHRQ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
,VRSURS\OWROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OHQHFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
1DSKWKDOHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
Q3URS\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
6W\UHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ROXHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULFKORURSURSDQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
9LQ\OFKORULGH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
PS;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
R;\OHQH 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
0HWK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
(WK\OWHUWEXW\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
'LLVRSURS\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUWDP\OPHWK\OHWKHU 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
WHUW%XW\ODOFRKRO 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 
JNJ
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&
1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHULHV

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH    
7ROXHQHG}
 

 
%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH




%DWFK
92&

92&

92&

92&
 ,,B''B%%
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
-21(6(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<5(68/76
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
4&/LPLWV



27 153
&OLHQW
 
&OLHQW$GGUHVV
67

$WWQ


3URMHFW

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
6RLO
*&

-RQHV,'
9/&6 9/&6' 9&&9
3DUDPHWHU
/&6
5HFRYHU\


/&6'
5HFRYHU\

53'
$FFHSWDELOLW\
5DQJH

&&9
$FFHSWDELOLW\
5DQJH


9LQ\OFKORULGH      
'LFKORURHWKHQH 
     
&LV'LFKORURHWKHQH       7ULFKORURHWKDQH 
   

 
%HQ]HQH      
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 
  
 
7ROXHQH      
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH

    
&KORUREHQ]HQH

  

 
(WK\OEHQ]HQH      
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH


   
 
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&
   
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH  
 
 
7ROXHQHG} 

 
 
%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH

 

 
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
'/6FLHQFH,QF
6LJQDO+LOO&$
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
$FFHSWDELOLW\UDQJHIRU53'LVî
92&
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 
17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
5HSRUWGDWH

-RQHV5HI1R

'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

'DWH$QDO\]HG

3K\VLFDO6WDWH

-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'DYLG//XFHUR
28 154
&OLHQW
 
&OLHQW$GGUHVV
67

$WWQ


3URMHFW

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
6RLO
*&

-RQHV,'
9/&6 9/&6' 9&&9
3DUDPHWHU
/&6
5HFRYHU\


/&6'
5HFRYHU\

53'
$FFHSWDELOLW\
5DQJH

&&9
$FFHSWDELOLW\
5DQJH


9LQ\OFKORULGH
  
   
'LFKORURHWKHQH


  
 
&LV'LFKORURHWKHQH

  
 
7ULFKORURHWKDQH

  
 
%HQ]HQH     
 
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 
   
 
7ROXHQH      
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH

    
&KORUREHQ]HQH      
(WK\OEHQ]HQH    
 
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH

    
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&


  
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH

  
 
7ROXHQHG}   
 
%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH  
   
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
$FFHSWDELOLW\UDQJHIRU53'LVî
92&
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH
-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 5HSRUWGDWH

-RQHV5HI1R

'/6FLHQFH,QF

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

'DWH$QDO\]HG

3K\VLFDO6WDWH

29 155
&OLHQW
 
&OLHQW$GGUHVV
67

$WWQ


3URMHFW

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
6RLO
*&

-RQHV,'
9/&6 9/&6' 9&&9
3DUDPHWHU
/&6
5HFRYHU\


/&6'
5HFRYHU\

53'
$FFHSWDELOLW\
5DQJH

&&9
$FFHSWDELOLW\
5DQJH


9LQ\OFKORULGH      
'LFKORURHWKHQH       &LV'LFKORURHWKHQH       7ULFKORURHWKDQH   
 

 
%HQ]HQH  
    
7ULFKORURHWKHQH    
 
7ROXHQH   
   
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH 

  
 
&KORUREHQ]HQH 
  
 
(WK\OEHQ]HQH      
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH    

 
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&
 

 
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH

 
 
7ROXHQHG} 

   
%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH

  
 
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
$FFHSWDELOLW\UDQJHIRU53'LVî
92&
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH
-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 5HSRUWGDWH

-RQHV5HI1R

'/6FLHQFH,QF

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

'DWH$QDO\]HG

3K\VLFDO6WDWH

30 156
&OLHQW
 
&OLHQW$GGUHVV
67

$WWQ


3URMHFW

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
6RLO
*&

-RQHV,'
9/&6 9/&6' 9&&9
3DUDPHWHU
/&6
5HFRYHU\


/&6'
5HFRYHU\

53'
$FFHSWDELOLW\
5DQJH

&&9
$FFHSWDELOLW\
5DQJH


9LQ\OFKORULGH
 
  
 
'LFKORURHWKHQH
   
 
&LV'LFKORURHWKHQH
     
7ULFKORURHWKDQH

  
 
%HQ]HQH      
7ULFKORURHWKHQH 
  
 
7ROXHQH  
    
7HWUDFKORURHWKHQH

    
&KORUREHQ]HQH      
(WK\OEHQ]HQH    

 
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH

    
*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV
&&


  
6XUURJDWH5HFRYHU\

'LEURPRIOXRURPHWKDQH

 
 
7ROXHQHG}   
 
%URPRIOXRUREHQ]HQH     
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
$FFHSWDELOLW\UDQJHIRU53'LVî
92&
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH
-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
(3$%E\±9RODWLOH2UJDQLFVE\*&062[\JHQDWHV*DVROLQH5DQJH2UJDQLFV 5HSRUWGDWH

-RQHV5HI1R

'/6FLHQFH,QF

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

'DWH$QDO\]HG

3K\VLFDO6WDWH

31 157
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

6LOYHU$J 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
$UVHQLF$V 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
%DULXP%D 86.2 48.1 37.1 49.3 35.8  PJNJ
%HU\OOLXP%H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&DGPLXP&G 1.6 1.5 1.0 1.3 0.9  PJNJ
&REDOW&R 7.2 5.8 4.8 4.7 4.4  PJNJ
&KURPLXP&U 15.4 13.6 8.5 12.2 7.9  PJNJ
&RSSHU&X 17.5 7.0 3.2 6.3 2.9  PJNJ
0RO\EGHQXP0R 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
1LFNHO1L 11.8 9.7 6.2 8.3 6.1  PJNJ
/HDG3E 12.4 3.0 1.3 2.7 1.2  PJNJ
$QWLPRQ\6E 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
7KDOOLXP7O 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
9DQDGLXP9 28.5 28.7 18.4 25.0 16.4  PJNJ
=LQF=Q 47.0 32.5 24.6 26.8 22.5  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
0HUFXU\+J 0.060 0.031 1' 0.033 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
+ + + + +
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 6LJQDO+LOO&$
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
'DYLG//XFHUR
'/6FLHQFH,QF
/$%25$725<5(68/76
(3$$0HUFXU\E\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ
32 158
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

6LOYHU$J 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
$UVHQLF$V 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
%DULXP%D 31.2 58.0 45.1 28.6 40.1  PJNJ
%HU\OOLXP%H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&DGPLXP&G 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.1 1.0  PJNJ
&REDOW&R 5.0 5.3 4.5 4.5 4.1  PJNJ
&KURPLXP&U 9.1 17.4 9.4 8.7 9.2  PJNJ
&RSSHU&X 3.7 8.7 3.4 3.1 4.8  PJNJ
0RO\EGHQXP0R 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
1LFNHO1L 8.1 9.9 6.8 6.2 5.7  PJNJ
/HDG3E 1.5 5.1 1.9 1.4 2.2  PJNJ
$QWLPRQ\6E 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
7KDOOLXP7O 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
9DQDGLXP9 19.6 28.9 18.8 20.3 18.8  PJNJ
=LQF=Q 28.2 32.4 24.4 23.8 17.7  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
0HUFXU\+J 1' 0.035 0.022 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
+ + + + +
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
'DYLG//XFHUR
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 (3$$0HUFXU\E\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ
33 159
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

6LOYHU$J 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
$UVHQLF$V 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
%DULXP%D 48.3 39.0 55.9 39.4 36.3  PJNJ
%HU\OOLXP%H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&DGPLXP&G 1.5 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.1  PJNJ
&REDOW&R 5.6 4.8 6.6 4.7 4.7  PJNJ
&KURPLXP&U 14.1 9.8 13.7 9.3 9.2  PJNJ
&RSSHU&X 7.4 3.9 7.3 3.9 3.3  PJNJ
0RO\EGHQXP0R 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
1LFNHO1L 9.4 6.6 7.7 7.5 6.3  PJNJ
/HDG3E 2.8 1.5 3.0 1.5 1.5  PJNJ
$QWLPRQ\6E 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
7KDOOLXP7O 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
9DQDGLXP9 27.1 22.6 26.1 19.5 20.6  PJNJ
=LQF=Q 30.9 26.9 27.5 23.2 24.9  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
0HUFXU\+J 0.029 1' 0.027 0.021 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
+ + + + +
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
'DYLG//XFHUR
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 
17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
(3$$0HUFXU\E\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ
34 160
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

6LOYHU$J 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
$UVHQLF$V 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
%DULXP%D 580* 50.0 68.7 88.2 58.8  PJNJ
%HU\OOLXP%H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&DGPLXP&G 2.6 1.3 1.8 1.3 1.2  PJNJ
&REDOW&R 12.0 6.1 7.7 4.5 5.6  PJNJ
&KURPLXP&U 24.4 11.0 17.4 11.9 11.7  PJNJ
&RSSHU&X 26.5 11.4 7.4 7.0 6.4  PJNJ
0RO\EGHQXP0R 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
1LFNHO1L 23.1 9.2 10.1 6.7 7.2  PJNJ
/HDG3E 57.8 7.1 3.7 4.2 3.1  PJNJ
$QWLPRQ\6E 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
7KDOOLXP7O 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
9DQDGLXP9 37.3 20.0 35.0 24.6 22.0  PJNJ
=LQF=Q 105 57.0 35.2 23.4 21.2  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU 
   
%DWFK
,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
0HUFXU\+J 0.101 0.073 0.028 0.043 0.027  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
+ +
 +
 +
 +


'LOXWLRQVIRUWKHVHFRPSRXQG
V

ILUVWQXPEHUIRUDOORWKHUV
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
6LJQDO+LOO&$
(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 (3$$0HUFXU\E\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ
35 161
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%
#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

6LOYHU$J 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
$UVHQLF$V 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
%DULXP%D 43.1 120 117 53.6 96.7  PJNJ
%HU\OOLXP%H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&DGPLXP&G 1.1 1.6 1.3 1.6 1.7  PJNJ
&REDOW&R 5.2 6.0 5.5 6.1 6.6  PJNJ
&KURPLXP&U 11.1 14.2 13.2 13.9 15.6  PJNJ
&RSSHU&X 5.3 23.1 10.1 7.4 20.2  PJNJ
0RO\EGHQXP0R 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
1LFNHO1L 7.4 12.1 7.8 9.3 10.8  PJNJ
/HDG3E 2.5 45.0 13.5 3.1 19.0  PJNJ
$QWLPRQ\6E 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
7KDOOLXP7O 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
9DQDGLXP9 21.5 24.8 23.9 29.0 27.8  PJNJ
=LQF=Q 22.3 118 37.4 32.0 74.7  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

6DPSOH,'
%#
%#
%#
%#
%
#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
0HUFXU\+J 1' 0.187 0.045 0.023 0.085  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
+
 +
 +
 +
 +

1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 
17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$

17HPSOH$YH
'DYLG//XFHUR
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
(3$$0HUFXU\E\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ
36 162
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%
#
%
#
%
#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

6LOYHU$J 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
$UVHQLF$V 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
%DULXP%D 53.4 25.4 54.6 81.0 76.0  PJNJ
%HU\OOLXP%H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
&DGPLXP&G 1.6 0.8 1.6 1.4 0.9  PJNJ
&REDOW&R 5.1 3.5 13.9 5.3 3.5  PJNJ
&KURPLXP&U 15.7 6.9 19.6 21.3 12.8  PJNJ
&RSSHU&X 8.2 2.8 6.8 19.3 4.9  PJNJ
0RO\EGHQXP0R 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
1LFNHO1L 10.1 5.0 12.1 9.2 5.4  PJNJ
/HDG3E 2.8 1.2 2.2 22.4 2.6  PJNJ
$QWLPRQ\6E 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
7KDOOLXP7O 1' 1' 1' 1' 1'  PJNJ
9DQDGLXP9 30.6 17.4 32.0 20.9 18.9  PJNJ
=LQF=Q 31.4 19.0 38.2 66.3 16.4  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

6DPSOH,'
%
#
%
#
%
#
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 67
 67

67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
0HUFXU\+J 0.043 1' 0.023 4.168 0.037  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU     
%DWFK
+
 +
 +
 +
 +

1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 
17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$

17HPSOH$YH
'DYLG//XFHUR
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
(3$$0HUFXU\E\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ
37 163
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

6LOYHU$J 1' 1'  PJNJ
$UVHQLF$V 1' 1'  PJNJ
%DULXP%D 47.7 49.0  PJNJ
%HU\OOLXP%H 1' 1'  PJNJ
&DGPLXP&G 1.2 1.8  PJNJ
&REDOW&R 5.4 8.6  PJNJ
&KURPLXP&U 11.0 19.7  PJNJ
&RSSHU&X 5.1 8.5  PJNJ
0RO\EGHQXP0R 1' 1'  PJNJ
1LFNHO1L 7.0 21.1  PJNJ
/HDG3E 2.0 1.8  PJNJ
$QWLPRQ\6E 1' 1'  PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 1' 1'  PJNJ
7KDOOLXP7O 1' 1'  PJNJ
9DQDGLXP9 23.2 35.9  PJNJ
=LQF=Q 23.8 46.9  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU  
%DWFK
,
 ,

6DPSOH,'
%#
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
0HUFXU\+J 1' 1'  PJNJ
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU  
%DWFK
+
 +

1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW
(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 
17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$

17HPSOH$YH
'DYLG//XFHUR
/$%25$725<5(68/76
'/6FLHQFH,QF
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
(3$$0HUFXU\E\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ
38 164
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
%$7&+
3UHSDUHG

 $QDO\]HG

$QDO\WHV

0(7+2'%/$1.

6LOYHU$J 1'  PJNJ
$UVHQLF$V 1'  PJNJ
%DULXP%D 1'  PJNJ
%HU\OOLXP%H 1'  PJNJ
&DGPLXP&G 1'  PJNJ
&REDOW&R 1'  PJNJ
&KURPLXP&U 1'  PJNJ
&RSSHU&X 1'  PJNJ
0RO\EGHQXP0R 1'  PJNJ
1LFNHO1L 1'  PJNJ
/HDG3E 1'  PJNJ
$QWLPRQ\6E 1'  PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 1'  PJNJ
7KDOOLXP7O 1'  PJNJ
9DQDGLXP9 1'  PJNJ
=LQF=Q 1'  PJNJ
1' 1RW'HWHFWHG
,
0%
(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 5HVXOW 6SLNH/HYHO 5(& 5(&/LPLWV 53' 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV -21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
,

'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
39 165
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
%$7&+
3UHSDUHG

 $QDO\]HG

5HVXOW 6SLNH/HYHO 5(& 53' 5(&/LPLWV
$QDO\WHV

/&6

%DULXP%D     PJNJ
&REDOW&R     PJNJ
/HDG3E     PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 
 
  PJNJ
=LQF=Q  
  PJNJ
/&6'

%DULXP%D   
   PJNJ
&REDOW&R      PJNJ
/HDG3E   
   PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 
 
   PJNJ
=LQF=Q 

   PJNJ
&&9

%DULXP%D   
 PJ/
&REDOW&R   
 PJ/
/HDG3E   
 PJ/
6HOHQLXP6H 
 

 PJ/
=LQF=Q 




 PJ/
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
1' 1RW'HWHFWHG
-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
,

(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 8QLWV
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
$FFHSWDELOLW\UDQJHIRU53'LVî
,
/&6
,
/&6'
,
&&9
40 166
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
%$7&+
3UHSDUHG
 $QDO\]HG

$QDO\WHV

0(7+2'%/$1.

0HUFXU\+J 1'  PJNJ
/&6

0HUFXU\+J 
 
  PJNJ
/&6'

0HUFXU\+J      PJNJ
&&9

0HUFXU\+J   
 µJ/
1' 1RW'HWHFWHG
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
$FFHSWDELOLW\UDQJHIRU53'LVî
+0%
+/&6
+/&6'
+&&9
+
(3$$0HUFXU\E\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ
5HVXOW 6SLNH/HYHO 5(& 53' 5(&/LPLWV 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV 'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
41 167
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
%$7&+
3UHSDUHG

 $QDO\]HG

$QDO\WHV

0(7+2'%/$1.

6LOYHU$J 1'  PJNJ
$UVHQLF$V 1'  PJNJ
%DULXP%D 1'  PJNJ
%HU\OOLXP%H 1'  PJNJ
&DGPLXP&G 1'  PJNJ
&REDOW&R 1'  PJNJ
&KURPLXP&U 1'  PJNJ
&RSSHU&X 1'  PJNJ
0RO\EGHQXP0R 1'  PJNJ
1LFNHO1L 1'  PJNJ
/HDG3E 1'  PJNJ
$QWLPRQ\6E 1'  PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H 1'  PJNJ
7KDOOLXP7O 1'  PJNJ
9DQDGLXP9 1'  PJNJ
=LQF=Q 1'  PJNJ
1' 1RW'HWHFWHG
-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
,

(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 ,
0%
5HVXOW 6SLNH/HYHO 5(& 5(&/LPLWV 53' 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV 42 168
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
%$7&+
3UHSDUHG

 $QDO\]HG

5HVXOW 6SLNH/HYHO 5(& 53' 5(&/LPLWV
$QDO\WHV

/&6

%DULXP%D     PJNJ
&REDOW&R 
   PJNJ
/HDG3E     PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H     PJNJ
=LQF=Q  
  PJNJ
/&6'

%DULXP%D      PJNJ
&REDOW&R      PJNJ
/HDG3E 
    PJNJ
6HOHQLXP6H      PJNJ
=LQF=Q 

    PJNJ
&&9

%DULXP%D   
 PJ/
&REDOW&R   
 PJ/
/HDG3E   
 PJ/
6HOHQLXP6H   
 PJ/
=LQF=Q   
 PJ/
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
1' 1RW'HWHFWHG
-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
,

(3$%E\7LWOH&$07UDFH0HWDOVE\,&32(6 8QLWV
,
/&6
,
/&6'
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
$FFHSWDELOLW\UDQJHIRU53'LVî
,
&&9
43 169
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
%$7&+
3UHSDUHG

 $QDO\]HG

$QDO\WHV

0(7+2'%/$1.

0HUFXU\+J 1'  PJNJ
/&6

0HUFXU\+J     PJNJ
/&6'

0HUFXU\+J      PJNJ
&&9

0HUFXU\+J   
 µJ/
1' 1RW'HWHFWHG
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
-21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
+

(3$$0HUFXU\E\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ
5HVXOW 6SLNH/HYHO 5(& 53' 5(&/LPLWV 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV +
0%
+
/&6
+
/&6'
+
&&9
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
$FFHSWDELOLW\UDQJHIRU53'LVî
44 170
45 171
46 172
47 173
48 174
49 175
176
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#

-RQHV,'
67
 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

/HDG3E 0.13  PJ/
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU 
%DWFK
,
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
67/&:DVWH([WUDFWLRQ7HVWE\,&32(6
6LJQDO+LOO&$
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
'DYLG//XFHUR
'/6FLHQFH,QF
/$%25$725<5(68/76
:0DSOH$YH
(O6HJXQGR&$

2 177
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
%$7&+
3UHSDUHG
 $QDO\]HG

$QDO\WHV

0HWKRG%ODQN

/HDG3E 1'  PJ/
/&6

/HDG3E 
 

  PJ/
/&6'

/HDG3E 
 

  PJ/
&&9

/HDG3E   
 PJ/
1' 1RW'HWHFWHG
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
$FFHSWDELOLW\UDQJHIRU53'LVî
,0%
,/&6
,/&6'
,&&9
67/&:DVWH([WUDFWLRQ7HVWE\,&32(6
5HVXOW 6SLNH/HYHO 5(& 53' 5(&/LPLWV 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV -21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
:0DSOH$YH
(O6HJXQGR&$

,
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
3 178
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
6DPSOH,'
%#

-RQHV,'
67

5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV
$QDO\WHV

0HUFXU\+J 40.06  óJ/
'LOXWLRQ)DFWRU 
%DWFK
+
1' 9DOXHOHVVWKDQUHSRUWLQJOLPLW

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
67/&:DVWH([WUDFWLRQ7HVWE\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ 6LJQDO+LOO&$
-21(6(19,5210(17$/
'DYLG//XFHUR
'/6FLHQFH,QF
/$%25$725<5(68/76
:0DSOH$YH
(O6HJXQGR&$
4 179
&OLHQW
 5HSRUWGDWH

&OLHQW$GGUHVV
-RQHV5HI1R
67

$WWQ
'DWH6DPSOHG

'DWH5HFHLYHG

3URMHFW
'DWH$QDO\]HG

3URMHFW$GGUHVV
3K\VLFDO6WDWH
6RLO
%$7&+
3UHSDUHG
 $QDO\]HG

$QDO\WHV

0HWKRG%ODQN

/HDG3E 1'  óJ/
/&6

/HDG3E     óJ/
/&6'

/HDG3E      óJ/
&&9

/HDG3E   
 óJ/
1' 1RW'HWHFWHG
/&6 /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH
/&6' /DERUDWRU\&RQWURO6DPSOH'XSOLFDWH
&&9 &RQWLQXLQJ&DOLEUDWLRQ9HULILFDWLRQ
53' 5HODWLYH3HUFHQW'LIIHUHQFH
$FFHSWDELOLW\UDQJHIRU53'LVî
+0%
+/&6
+/&6'
+&&9
67/&:DVWH([WUDFWLRQ7HVWE\&ROG9DSRU$WRPLF$EVRUSWLRQ 5HVXOW 6SLNH/HYHO 5(& 53' 5(&/LPLWV 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW 8QLWV -21(6(19,5210(17$/48$/,7<&21752/,1)250$7,21
'/6FLHQFH,QF
:0DSOH$YH
(O6HJXQGR&$
+
'DYLG//XFHUR

17HPSOH$YH

17HPSOH$YH
6LJQDO+LOO&$
5 180
6 181
7 182
8 183
9 184
Jones Environmental
RE: 1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
11007 Forest Place
Colby Wakeman
Mike Jaroudi
Project Manager
Enclosed are the results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on 08/05/21 14:55. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,
12 August 2021
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled

ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES
Date Received
B-1 @ 5' T212463-01 Soil 08/04/21 11:00 08/05/21 14:55
B-1 @ 10' T212463-02 Soil 08/04/21 11:05 08/05/21 14:55 B-1 @ 15' T212463-03 Soil 08/04/21 11:10 08/05/21 14:55 B-2 @ 5' T212463-04 Soil 08/04/21 10:25 08/05/21 14:55
B-2 @ 10' T212463-05 Soil 08/04/21 10:30 08/05/21 14:55 B-2 @ 15' T212463-06 Soil 08/04/21 10:35 08/05/21 14:55 B-3 @ 5' T212463-07 Soil 08/04/21 07:10 08/05/21 14:55
B-3 @ 10' T212463-08 Soil 08/04/21 07:15 08/05/21 14:55 B-3 @ 15' T212463-09 Soil 08/04/21 07:20 08/05/21 14:55 B-4 @ 5' T212463-10 Soil 08/04/21 07:35 08/05/21 14:55
B-4 @ 10' T212463-11 Soil 08/04/21 07:40 08/05/21 14:55 B-4 @ 15' T212463-12 Soil 08/04/21 07:45 08/05/21 14:55 B-5 @ 5' T212463-13 Soil 08/04/21 07:50 08/05/21 14:55
B-5 @ 10' T212463-14 Soil 08/04/21 07:55 08/05/21 14:55 B-5 @ 15' T212463-15 Soil 08/04/21 08:00 08/05/21 14:55 B-6 @ 5' T212463-16 Soil 08/04/21 10:00 08/05/21 14:55
B-6 @ 10' T212463-17 Soil 08/04/21 10:05 08/05/21 14:55 B-6 @ 15' T212463-18 Soil 08/04/21 10:10 08/05/21 14:55 B-7 @ 5' T212463-19 Soil 08/04/21 09:30 08/05/21 14:55
B-7 @ 10' T212463-20 Soil 08/04/21 09:35 08/05/21 14:55 B-7 @ 15' T212463-21 Soil 08/04/21 09:40 08/05/21 14:55 B-8 @ 5' T212463-22 Soil 08/04/21 08:55 08/05/21 14:55
B-8 @ 10' T212463-23 Soil 08/04/21 09:00 08/05/21 14:55 B-8 @ 15' T212463-24 Soil 08/04/21 09:05 08/05/21 14:55 B-9 @ 5' T212463-25 Soil 08/04/21 11:35 08/05/21 14:55
B-9 @ 10' T212463-26 Soil 08/04/21 11:40 08/05/21 14:55 B-9 @ 15' T212463-27 Soil 08/04/21 11:45 08/05/21 14:55 B-9 @ 20' T212463-28 Soil 08/04/21 11:50 08/05/21 14:55 B-10 @ 5' T212463-29 Soil 08/04/21 08:15 08/05/21 14:55

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled

ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES
Date Received
B-10 @ 10' T212463-30 Soil 08/04/21 08:20 08/05/21 14:55 B-10 @ 15' T212463-31 Soil 08/04/21 08:25 08/05/21 14:55 B-10 @ 20' T212463-32 Soil 08/04/21 08:30 08/05/21 14:55

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax

DETECTIONS SUMMARY
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-1 @ 5' T212463-01
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 120 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-1 @ 10' T212463-02
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 69 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-1 @ 15' T212463-03
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 71 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Sample ID: B-2 @ 5' Laboratory ID: T212463-04
No Results Detected
Sample ID: B-2 @ 10' Laboratory ID: T212463-05
No Results Detected
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-2 @ 15' T212463-06
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 83 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-3 @ 5' T212463-07
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 96 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Sample ID: B-3 @ 10' Laboratory ID: T212463-08
No Results Detected
Sample ID: B-3 @ 15' Laboratory ID: T212463-09
No Results Detected
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-4 @ 5' T212463-10
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 90 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Sample ID: B-4 @ 10' Laboratory ID: T212463-11
No Results Detected
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-4 @ 15' T212463-12
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 88 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-5 @ 5' T212463-13
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 55 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
Sample ID: B-5 @ 10' Laboratory ID: T212463-14
No Results Detected
Sample ID: B-5 @ 15' Laboratory ID: T212463-15
No Results Detected
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-6 @ 5' T212463-16
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 130 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-6 @ 10' T212463-17
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 94 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Sample ID: B-6 @ 15' Laboratory ID: T212463-18
No Results Detected
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-7 @ 5' T212463-19
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 81 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-7 @ 10' T212463-20
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 90 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-7 @ 15' T212463-21
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 100 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-8 @ 5' T212463-22
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 76 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-8 @ 10' T212463-23
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 93 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Sample ID: B-8 @ 15' Laboratory ID: T212463-24
No Results Detected
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-9 @ 5' T212463-25
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 160 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-9 @ 10' T212463-26
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 87 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Sample ID: B-9 @ 15' Laboratory ID: T212463-27
No Results Detected

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
Sample ID: B-9 @ 20' Laboratory ID: T212463-28
No Results Detected
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-10 @ 5' T212463-29
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 110 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Laboratory ID:

Analyte Result Limit Units Method
B-10 @ 10' T212463-30
Notes
Reporting
Sample ID:

Hexavalent Chromium 83 1.0 ug/kg EPA 7199
Sample ID: B-10 @ 15' Laboratory ID: T212463-31
No Results Detected
Sample ID: B-10 @ 20' Laboratory ID: T212463-32
No Results Detected

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-1 @ 5'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-01(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Carbazole ND 320 3300 ug/kg 1080542 10 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C R-07 Aniline ND 560 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Phenol ND 500 11000 " " " " " " R-07
2-Chlorophenol ND 470 11000 " " " " " " R-07
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 480 3300 " " " " " " R-07
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 500 3300 " " " " " " R-07
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 590 3300 " " " " " " R-07
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 480 11000 " " " " " " R-07
1-Methylnaphthalene ND 510 3300 " " " " " " R-07
2-Methylnaphthalene ND 580 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Acenaphthene ND 190 3300 " " " " " " R-07
4-Nitrophenol ND 370 11000 " " " " " " R-07
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 400 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Pentachlorophenol ND 870 11000 " " " " " " R-07
Pyrene ND 320 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Acenaphthylene ND 520 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Anthracene ND 330 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Benzo (a) anthracene ND 260 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND 430 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND 570 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene ND 490 11000 " " " " " " R-07
Benzo (a) pyrene ND 420 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Benzyl alcohol ND 580 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 500 3300 " " " " " " R-07 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 500 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND 410 3300 " " " " " " R-07 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 870 3300 " " " " " " R-07 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 430 3300 " " " " " " R-07 Butyl benzyl phthalate ND 890 3300 " " " " " " R-07
4-Chloroaniline ND 490 3300 " " " " " " R-07
2-Chloronaphthalene ND 430 3300 " " " " " " R-07
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 510 3300 " " " " " " R-07 Chrysene ND 290 3300 " " " " " " R-07

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-1 @ 5'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-01(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND 450 3300 ug/kg 1080542 10 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C R-07 Dibenzofuran ND 560 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND 980 3300 " " " " " " R-07
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 450 3300 " " " " " " R-07
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 410 3300 " " " " " " R-07
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND 480 11000 " " " " " " R-07
Diethyl phthalate ND 390 3300 " " " " " " R-07
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 490 11000 " " " " " " R-07
Dimethyl phthalate ND 550 3300 " " " " " " R-07
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND 540 11000 " " " " " " R-07 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 2900 11000 " " " " " " R-07
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 460 11000 " " " " " " R-07
Di-n-octyl phthalate ND 1100 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Fluoranthene ND 250 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Fluorene ND 430 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Hexachlorobenzene ND 610 17000 " " " " " " R-07
Hexachlorobutadiene ND 510 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 450 11000 " " " " " " R-07 Hexachloroethane ND 360 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND 470 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Isophorone ND 450 3300 " " " " " " R-07
2-Methylphenol ND 900 11000 " " " " " " R-07
4-Methylphenol ND 460 11000 " " " " " " R-07
Naphthalene ND 480 3300 " " " " " " R-07
2-Nitroaniline ND 430 3300 " " " " " " R-07
3-Nitroaniline ND 360 3300 " " " " " " R-07
4-Nitroaniline ND 430 3300 " " " " " " R-07
Nitrobenzene ND 510 11000 " " " " " " R-07
2-Nitrophenol ND 480 11000 " " " " " " R-07
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 420 3300 " " " " " " R-07
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 460 3300 " " " " " " R-07
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND 470 3300 " " " " " " R-07
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND 510 3300 " " " " " " R-07

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-1 @ 5'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-01(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Phenanthrene ND 420 3300 ug/kg 1080542 10 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C R-07 Azobenzene ND 570 3300 " " " " " " R-07
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND 410 11000 " " " " " " R-07
Pyridine ND 1200 3300 " " " " " " R-07
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND 410 11000 " " " " " " R-07
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 58.7 % 15-121 " " " " R-07
Surrogate: Phenol-d6 66.4 % 24-113 " " " " R-07
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 61.8 % 21.3-119 " " " " R-07 Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 65.0 % 32.4-102 " " " " R-07 Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 62.6 % 18.1-105 " " " " R-07 Surrogate: Terphenyl-dl4 63.8 % 29.1-130 " " " " R-07
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA/ASTM Methods Hexavalent Chromium 120 0.053 1.0 ug/kg 1 1080543 08/05/21 08/06/21 EPA 7199

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-1 @ 10'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-02(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Carbazole ND 29 300 ug/kg 1080542 1 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C Aniline ND 50 300 " " " " " "
Phenol ND 45 1000 " " " " " "
2-Chlorophenol ND 42 1000 " " " " " "
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 43 300 " " " " " "
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 45 300 " " " " " "
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 53 300 " " " " " "
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 43 1000 " " " " " "
1-Methylnaphthalene ND 46 300 " " " " " "
2-Methylnaphthalene ND 52 300 " " " " " "
Acenaphthene ND 17 300 " " " " " "
4-Nitrophenol ND 33 1000 " " " " " "
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 36 300 " " " " " "
Pentachlorophenol ND 78 1000 " " " " " "
Pyrene ND 29 300 " " " " " "
Acenaphthylene ND 47 300 " " " " " "
Anthracene ND 30 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (a) anthracene ND 23 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND 51 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene ND 44 1000 " " " " " "
Benzo (a) pyrene ND 38 300 " " " " " "
Benzyl alcohol ND 52 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 45 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 45 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND 37 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 78 300 " " " " " "
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Butyl benzyl phthalate ND 80 300 " " " " " "
4-Chloroaniline ND 44 300 " " " " " "
2-Chloronaphthalene ND 39 300 " " " " " "
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 46 300 " " " " " "
Chrysene ND 26 300 " " " " " "

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-1 @ 10'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-02(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND 40 300 ug/kg 1080542 1 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C Dibenzofuran ND 50 300 " " " " " "
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND 88 300 " " " " " "
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 40 300 " " " " " "
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 37 300 " " " " " "
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND 43 1000 " " " " " "
Diethyl phthalate ND 35 300 " " " " " "
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 44 1000 " " " " " "
Dimethyl phthalate ND 49 300 " " " " " "
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND 48 1000 " " " " " "
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 260 1000 " " " " " "
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 41 1000 " " " " " "
Di-n-octyl phthalate ND 100 300 " " " " " "
Fluoranthene ND 22 300 " " " " " "
Fluorene ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Hexachlorobenzene ND 55 1500 " " " " " "
Hexachlorobutadiene ND 46 300 " " " " " "
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 40 1000 " " " " " "
Hexachloroethane ND 32 300 " " " " " "
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND 42 300 " " " " " "
Isophorone ND 40 300 " " " " " "
2-Methylphenol ND 81 1000 " " " " " "
4-Methylphenol ND 41 1000 " " " " " "
Naphthalene ND 43 300 " " " " " "
2-Nitroaniline ND 39 300 " " " " " "
3-Nitroaniline ND 32 300 " " " " " "
4-Nitroaniline ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Nitrobenzene ND 46 1000 " " " " " "
2-Nitrophenol ND 43 1000 " " " " " "
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 38 300 " " " " " "
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 41 300 " " " " " "
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND 42 300 " " " " " "
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND 46 300 " " " " " "

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-1 @ 10'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-02(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Phenanthrene ND 38 300 ug/kg 1080542 1 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C Azobenzene ND 51 300 " " " " " "
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND 37 1000 " " " " " "
Pyridine ND 110 300 " " " " " "
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND 37 1000 " " " " " "
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 65.8 % 15-121 " " " "
Surrogate: Phenol-d6 69.7 % 24-113 " " " "
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 67.7 % 21.3-119 " " " "
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 72.7 % 32.4-102 " " " "
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 84.1 % 18.1-105 " " " " Surrogate: Terphenyl-dl4 73.4 % 29.1-130 " " " "
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA/ASTM Methods Hexavalent Chromium 69 0.053 1.0 ug/kg 1 1080543 08/05/21 08/06/21 EPA 7199

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-1 @ 15'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-03(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Carbazole ND 29 300 ug/kg 1080542 1 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C Aniline ND 50 300 " " " " " "
Phenol ND 45 1000 " " " " " "
2-Chlorophenol ND 42 1000 " " " " " "
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 43 300 " " " " " "
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 45 300 " " " " " "
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 53 300 " " " " " "
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 43 1000 " " " " " "
1-Methylnaphthalene ND 46 300 " " " " " "
2-Methylnaphthalene ND 52 300 " " " " " "
Acenaphthene ND 17 300 " " " " " "
4-Nitrophenol ND 33 1000 " " " " " "
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 36 300 " " " " " "
Pentachlorophenol ND 78 1000 " " " " " "
Pyrene ND 29 300 " " " " " "
Acenaphthylene ND 47 300 " " " " " "
Anthracene ND 30 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (a) anthracene ND 23 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND 51 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene ND 44 1000 " " " " " "
Benzo (a) pyrene ND 38 300 " " " " " "
Benzyl alcohol ND 52 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 45 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 45 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND 37 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 78 300 " " " " " "
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Butyl benzyl phthalate ND 80 300 " " " " " "
4-Chloroaniline ND 44 300 " " " " " "
2-Chloronaphthalene ND 39 300 " " " " " "
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 46 300 " " " " " "
Chrysene ND 26 300 " " " " " "

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-1 @ 15'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-03(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND 40 300 ug/kg 1080542 1 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C Dibenzofuran ND 50 300 " " " " " "
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND 88 300 " " " " " "
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 40 300 " " " " " "
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 37 300 " " " " " "
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND 43 1000 " " " " " "
Diethyl phthalate ND 35 300 " " " " " "
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 44 1000 " " " " " "
Dimethyl phthalate ND 49 300 " " " " " "
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND 48 1000 " " " " " "
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 260 1000 " " " " " "
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 41 1000 " " " " " "
Di-n-octyl phthalate ND 100 300 " " " " " "
Fluoranthene ND 22 300 " " " " " "
Fluorene ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Hexachlorobenzene ND 55 1500 " " " " " "
Hexachlorobutadiene ND 46 300 " " " " " "
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 40 1000 " " " " " "
Hexachloroethane ND 32 300 " " " " " "
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND 42 300 " " " " " "
Isophorone ND 40 300 " " " " " "
2-Methylphenol ND 81 1000 " " " " " "
4-Methylphenol ND 41 1000 " " " " " "
Naphthalene ND 43 300 " " " " " "
2-Nitroaniline ND 39 300 " " " " " "
3-Nitroaniline ND 32 300 " " " " " "
4-Nitroaniline ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Nitrobenzene ND 46 1000 " " " " " "
2-Nitrophenol ND 43 1000 " " " " " "
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 38 300 " " " " " "
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 41 300 " " " " " "
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND 42 300 " " " " " "
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND 46 300 " " " " " "

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-1 @ 15'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-03(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Phenanthrene ND 38 300 ug/kg 1080542 1 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C Azobenzene ND 51 300 " " " " " "
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND 37 1000 " " " " " "
Pyridine ND 110 300 " " " " " "
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND 37 1000 " " " " " "
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 66.1 % 15-121 " " " "
Surrogate: Phenol-d6 69.9 % 24-113 " " " "
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 67.7 % 21.3-119 " " " "
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 71.9 % 32.4-102 " " " "
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 79.3 % 18.1-105 " " " " Surrogate: Terphenyl-dl4 78.1 % 29.1-130 " " " "
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA/ASTM Methods Hexavalent Chromium 71 0.053 1.0 ug/kg 1 1080543 08/05/21 08/06/21 EPA 7199

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-2 @ 5'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-04(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Carbazole ND 29 300 ug/kg 1080542 1 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C Aniline ND 50 300 " " " " " "
Phenol ND 45 1000 " " " " " "
2-Chlorophenol ND 42 1000 " " " " " "
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 43 300 " " " " " "
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 45 300 " " " " " "
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 53 300 " " " " " "
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 43 1000 " " " " " "
1-Methylnaphthalene ND 46 300 " " " " " "
2-Methylnaphthalene ND 52 300 " " " " " "
Acenaphthene ND 17 300 " " " " " "
4-Nitrophenol ND 33 1000 " " " " " "
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 36 300 " " " " " "
Pentachlorophenol ND 78 1000 " " " " " "
Pyrene ND 29 300 " " " " " "
Acenaphthylene ND 47 300 " " " " " "
Anthracene ND 30 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (a) anthracene ND 23 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND 51 300 " " " " " "
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene ND 44 1000 " " " " " "
Benzo (a) pyrene ND 38 300 " " " " " "
Benzyl alcohol ND 52 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 45 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 45 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND 37 300 " " " " " "
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 78 300 " " " " " "
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Butyl benzyl phthalate ND 80 300 " " " " " "
4-Chloroaniline ND 44 300 " " " " " "
2-Chloronaphthalene ND 39 300 " " " " " "
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 46 300 " " " " " "
Chrysene ND 26 300 " " " " " "

SunStar Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Jones Environmental
11007 Forest Place ST-17934
Colby Wakeman
1933 N. Temple Ave.

Santa Fe Springs CA, 90670 08/12/21 13:52
25712 Commercentre Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
949.297.5020 Phone
949.297.5027 Fax
B-2 @ 5'
Analyte Result MDL Limit Units Batch Dilution Prepared Analyzed Method Notes T212463-04(Soil)
Reporting
SunStar Laboratories, Inc.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND 40 300 ug/kg 1080542 1 08/05/21 08/10/21 EPA 8270C Dibenzofuran ND 50 300 " " " " " "
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND 88 300 " " " " " "
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 40 300 " " " " " "
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 37 300 " " " " " "
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND 43 1000 " " " " " "
Diethyl phthalate ND 35 300 " " " " " "
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 44 1000 " " " " " "
Dimethyl phthalate ND 49 300 " " " " " "
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND 48 1000 " " " " " "
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 260 1000 " " " " " "
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 41 1000 " " " " " "
Di-n-octyl phthalate ND 100 300 " " " " " "
Fluoranthene ND 22 300 " " " " " "
Fluorene ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Hexachlorobenzene ND 55 1500 " " " " " "
Hexachlorobutadiene ND 46 300 " " " " " "
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 40 1000 " " " " " "
Hexachloroethane ND 32 300 " " " " " "
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND 42 300 " " " " " "
Isophorone ND 40 300 " " " " " "
2-Methylphenol ND 81 1000 " " " " " "
4-Methylphenol ND 41 1000 " " " " " "
Naphthalene ND 43 300 " " " " " "
2-Nitroaniline ND 39 300 " " " " " "
3-Nitroaniline ND 32 300 " " " " " "
4-Nitroaniline ND 39 300 " " " " " "
Nitrobenzene ND 46 1000 " " " " " "
2-Nitrophenol ND 43 1000 " " " " " "
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 38 300 " " " " " "
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 41 300 " " " " " "
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND 42 300 " " " " " "
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND 46 300 " " " " " "