Cities Index.
Att C - Exhibit A: Final Draft MND

Signal Hill City Council
November 12, 2024

Document
Att C - Exhibit A: Final Draft MND
Meeting
November 12, 2024
Body
Signal Hill City Council
Pages
5
Original file
35.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cityofsignalhill.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

LANE NO

PARKING
20'W FIRE LANE

NO PARKING
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:44:16 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
2 GUEST

PARKING
SPACE

FIRE ACCESS
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:44:21 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:44:26 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:44:31 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
DU 8R
ENTRY TYPE DU'S 4 & 5R DU 8R
DU'S 2R, 6, 8R
2ND FLR OVERHANG
DU'S 3R, 4 ,7
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:44:36 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
DU'S 3R, 4, 7.

BALCONY DU'S: 3R, 6.

DU'S 2R, 4, 5R, 7.

DU'S: 2R, 4, 5R, 7.

DU'S 2R, 5R, 6, 8R DU 8R
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:44:41 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
GABLE ROOF AT OVERHANG DU'S 3R, 4, 7.

HIP ROOF AT BALCONY DU'S 3R, 8R
GABLE ROOF AT BALCONY DU 6
-
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:49:07 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
DU 1 MODIFIED DU 1 MODIFIED
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:44:51 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
DU 1 MODIFIED
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:44:56 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
DU-1
DU 8
FOOTING DEPTH VARIES.

FOR FOOTING DEPTH SEE GRADING
AND STRUCTURAL PLANS.

ELEVATIONS KEY NOTES
DU-1, DU-2, DU-3
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:45:01 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
DU-3R
DU's: 4, 5R, 6, 7
FOOTING DEPTH VARIES.

FOR FOOTING DEPTH SEE GRADING
AND STRUCTURAL PLANS.

ELEVATIONS KEY NOTES
DU2 NO AWNINGS ON FIRST FLOOR,
DU8 MODIFIED ROOF
DU'S 5R, 6
DU-8R MODIFIED ROOF
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:45:06 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
FOOTING DEPTH VARIES.

FOR FOOTING DEPTH SEE GRADING
AND STRUCTURAL PLANS.

ELEVATIONS KEY NOTES
DU-1
DU-1 DU-1
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:45:11 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
DU's: 4, 7
DU's: 3R WITH MAIN HIP ROOF
DU's: 5R, 8R NO GABLE OVERHANG
FOOTING DEPTH VARIES.

FOR FOOTING DEPTH SEE GRADING
AND STRUCTURAL PLANS.

ELEVATIONS KEY NOTES

DESIGN MATRIX

COLOR AND MATERIAL SCHEDULE
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:45:16 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:45:21 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EIGHT

DWELLING
UNITS
1933-1947 TEMPLE
AVENUE

SIGNAL HILL, CA
DCS

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES INC.
2201 E. Willow, Suite D, #319
Signal Hill, CA 90755
657-203-1583
OWNER
SIGNAL

VENTURES LLC
9 LYRA WAY,

COTO DE CASA,
CA 92679
PROJECT #4913
G:\Home Projects\4730 1933 Temple 2 -DCS\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod_032824\4730 1933 Temple 2 DU_1 Mod.dwg, 5/31/2024 4:45:26 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 September 20, 2024
Appendix D
CalEEMod Calculations
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
1 / 50
Courtyard Development Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
2 / 50

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.11. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated

3.13. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

3.15. Landscaping (2025) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
3 / 50

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
4 / 50

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
5 / 50

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
6 / 50

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
7 / 50

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Courtyard Development
Construction Start Date 10/1/2024
Operational Year 2026
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.30
Precipitation (days) 18.4
Location 1933 Temple Ave, Signal Hill, CA 90755, USA
County Los Angeles-South Coast
City Signal Hill
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 4737
EDFZ 7
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Long Beach Gas & Oil
App Version 2022.1.1.22

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
8 / 50
Single Family
Housing

8.00 Dwelling Unit 0.42 20,728 7,369 0.00 24.0 —
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.17 Acre 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.64 0.53 5.18 7.15 0.01 0.22 0.04 0.26 0.20 0.01 0.21 — 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.22 1,378 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.67 26.2 15.2 12.6 0.03 0.57 2.94 3.51 0.53 1.23 1.76 — 4,705 4,705 0.23 0.48 0.18 4,855 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.40 0.69 3.21 4.43 0.01 0.13 0.07 0.17 0.12 0.02 0.13 — 847 847 0.03 0.01 0.08 851 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.07 0.13 0.59 0.81 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 — 140 140 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 141

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
9 / 50
Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.64 0.53 5.18 7.15 0.01 0.22 0.04 0.26 0.20 0.01 0.21 — 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.22 1,378 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 1.67 1.28 15.2 12.6 0.03 0.57 2.94 3.51 0.53 1.23 1.76 — 4,705 4,705 0.23 0.48 0.18 4,855 2025 0.69 26.2 5.19 7.12 0.01 0.22 0.23 0.42 0.20 0.05 0.23 — 1,370 1,370 0.06 0.02 0.02 1,376 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.14 0.11 1.14 1.35 < 0.005 0.05 0.07 0.12 0.05 0.02 0.07 — 296 296 0.01 0.01 0.08 300 2025 0.40 0.69 3.21 4.43 0.01 0.13 0.03 0.17 0.12 0.01 0.13 — 847 847 0.03 0.01 0.06 851 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.02 0.02 0.21 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 49.0 49.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 49.6 2025 0.07 0.13 0.59 0.81 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 — 140 140 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 141

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.64 2.86 0.42 6.51 0.02 0.58 0.42 1.00 0.57 0.11 0.68 79.0 801 880 0.61 0.02 1.70 904 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.59 2.82 0.43 5.92 0.02 0.58 0.42 1.00 0.57 0.11 0.68 79.0 781 860 0.61 0.02 0.19 883 Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
10 / 50
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
(Max)
Unmit. 0.45 0.89 0.28 2.44 0.01 0.05 0.40 0.45 0.05 0.10 0.15 9.20 643 653 0.40 0.02 0.80 670 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.08 0.16 0.05 0.45 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.03 1.52 107 108 0.07 < 0.005 0.13 111

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.27 0.24 0.17 1.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 0.11 0.11 — 463 463 0.02 0.02 1.56 470 Area 2.36 2.61 0.17 4.52 0.01 0.57 — 0.57 0.56 — 0.56 74.9 144 219 0.22 < 0.005 — 226 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 179 179 0.01 < 0.005 — 179 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.64 15.4 16.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.43 0.00 3.43 0.34 0.00 — 12.0 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.15 0.15
Total 2.64 2.86 0.42 6.51 0.02 0.58 0.42 1.00 0.57 0.11 0.68 79.0 801 880 0.61 0.02 1.70 904 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.26 0.24 0.19 1.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 0.11 0.11 — 444 444 0.02 0.02 0.04 450 Area 2.32 2.57 0.17 4.07 0.01 0.57 — 0.57 0.56 — 0.56 74.9 143 218 0.22 < 0.005 — 225 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 179 179 0.01 < 0.005 — 179 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.64 15.4 16.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.43 0.00 3.43 0.34 0.00 — 12.0 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.15 0.15
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
11 / 50
Total 2.59 2.82 0.43 5.92 0.02 0.58 0.42 1.00 0.57 0.11 0.68 79.0 781 860 0.61 0.02 0.19 883 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.26 0.23 0.18 1.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.40 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 — 439 439 0.02 0.02 0.66 446 Area 0.19 0.65 0.01 0.59 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 5.13 10.6 15.8 0.02 < 0.005 — 16.2 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 179 179 0.01 < 0.005 — 179 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.64 15.4 16.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.43 0.00 3.43 0.34 0.00 — 12.0 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.15 0.15
Total 0.45 0.89 0.28 2.44 0.01 0.05 0.40 0.45 0.05 0.10 0.15 9.20 643 653 0.40 0.02 0.80 670 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 72.6 72.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 73.8 Area 0.03 0.12 < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.85 1.76 2.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.68 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 29.6 29.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 29.7 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.11 2.55 2.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.74 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.06 0.00 — 1.99 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.08 0.16 0.05 0.45 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.03 1.52 107 108 0.07 < 0.005 0.13 111

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
12 / 50
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 0.51 4.69 5.79 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.17 — 0.17 — 852 852 0.03 0.01 — 855 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 1.28 1.28 — 0.19 0.19 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.7 11.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.7 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.93 1.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.94 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 135 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
13 / 50
Hauling 0.08 0.02 1.37 0.51 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.29 0.01 0.08 0.09 — 1,058 1,058 0.06 0.17 0.06 1,110 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.86 1.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.89 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.5 14.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.2 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.31 0.31 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.40 2.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.52

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.60 0.50 4.60 5.56 0.01 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 858 858 0.03 0.01 — 861 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.21 0.21 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
14 / 50
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.8 11.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.8 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.95 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.95 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 66.9 66.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 67.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.93 0.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.94 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
15 / 50
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.15 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.41 1.19 11.4 10.7 0.02 0.53 — 0.53 0.49 — 0.49 — 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01 — 1,719 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.08 2.08 — 1.00 1.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.16 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 23.5 23.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 23.5 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
16 / 50
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.89 3.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.90 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 100 100 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 102 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.22 0.06 3.75 1.39 0.02 0.04 0.76 0.80 0.04 0.21 0.24 — 2,892 2,892 0.16 0.46 0.17 3,034 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.40 1.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.41 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.6 39.6 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 41.6 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.23 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.23 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.56 6.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.89

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
17 / 50
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.08 0.78 0.97 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 181 181 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.14 0.18 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 30.0 30.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.1 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 38.5 38.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 39.0 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.6 27.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 28.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
18 / 50
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.43 5.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.51 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.83 3.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.90 0.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.91 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.66 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.62 0.52 5.14 6.94 0.01 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.62 0.52 5.14 6.94 0.01 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
19 / 50
Off-Road 0.37 0.31 3.09 4.17 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 784 784 0.03 0.01 — 787 Equipment
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.56 0.76 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 130 130 0.01 < 0.005 — 130 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 39.8 39.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 40.4 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.1 27.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 28.4 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 37.7 37.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 38.2 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.1 27.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 28.3 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.0 23.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 23.3 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.3 16.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.81 3.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.86 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.70 2.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.82 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
20 / 50

3.11. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 0.51 4.37 5.31 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.18 — 0.18 — 823 823 0.03 0.01 — 826 Paving — 0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.3 11.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.3 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.87 1.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.87 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
21 / 50
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 229 229 0.01 0.01 0.02 232 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.19 3.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.23 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.53 0.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.53 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 25.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
22 / 50
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.84 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.55 7.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.64 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
23 / 50
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Landscaping (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.06 0.86 1.51 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 245 245 0.01 < 0.005 — 246 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.71 6.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.73 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.11 1.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.11 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
24 / 50
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 32.8 32.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 33.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.91 0.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.92 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.15 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
25 / 50
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Single
Family
Housing

0.27 0.24 0.17 1.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 0.11 0.11 — 463 463 0.02 0.02 1.56 470 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.27 0.24 0.17 1.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 0.11 0.11 — 463 463 0.02 0.02 1.56 470 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.26 0.24 0.19 1.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 0.11 0.11 — 444 444 0.02 0.02 0.04 450 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.26 0.24 0.19 1.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 0.11 0.11 — 444 444 0.02 0.02 0.04 450 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.05 0.04 0.03 0.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 72.6 72.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 73.8 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 72.6 72.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 73.8

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
26 / 50
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 80.4 80.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 80.7 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 80.4 80.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 80.7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 80.4 80.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 80.7 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 80.4 80.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 80.7 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
27 / 50
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 98.3 98.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 98.6 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 98.3 98.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 98.6 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 98.3 98.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 98.6 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 98.3 98.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 98.6 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 16.3 16.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.3 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 16.3 16.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.3

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
28 / 50
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 2.32 2.09 0.17 4.07 0.01 0.57 — 0.57 0.56 — 0.56 74.9 143 218 0.22 < 0.005 — 225 Consum
er
Products
— 0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.21 1.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.22 Total 2.36 2.61 0.17 4.52 0.01 0.57 — 0.57 0.56 — 0.56 74.9 144 219 0.22 < 0.005 — 226 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 2.32 2.09 0.17 4.07 0.01 0.57 — 0.57 0.56 — 0.56 74.9 143 218 0.22 < 0.005 — 225 Consum
er
Products
— 0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 2.32 2.57 0.17 4.07 0.01 0.57 — 0.57 0.56 — 0.56 74.9 143 218 0.22 < 0.005 — 225 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.85 1.62 2.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.55 Consum
er
Products
— 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
29 / 50
Architect — 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ural
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.14 Total 0.03 0.12 < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.85 1.76 2.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.68

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.64 15.4 16.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.64 15.4 16.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.64 15.4 16.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.64 15.4 16.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
30 / 50
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.11 2.55 2.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.74 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.11 2.55 2.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.74

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.43 0.00 3.43 0.34 0.00 — 12.0
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.43 0.00 3.43 0.34 0.00 — 12.0 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.43 0.00 3.43 0.34 0.00 — 12.0
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
31 / 50
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.43 0.00 3.43 0.34 0.00 — 12.0 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.06 0.00 — 1.99
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.06 0.00 — 1.99

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.15 0.15
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.15 0.15
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.15 0.15
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.15 0.15
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
32 / 50
Single — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Family
Housing
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
33 / 50
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
34 / 50

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
35 / 50

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
36 / 50
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 10/1/2024 10/7/2024 5.00 5.00 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/8/2024 10/14/2024 5.00 5.00 — Grading Grading 10/15/2024 10/21/2024 5.00 5.00 —
Building Construction Building Construction 10/22/2024 11/3/2025 5.00 270 — Paving Paving 11/4/2025 11/10/2025 5.00 5.00 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/11/2025 11/17/2025 5.00 5.00 — Landscaping Trenching 11/11/2025 11/24/2025 5.00 10.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
37 / 50
Site Preparation Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Landscaping Skid Steer Loaders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 71.0 0.37

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 10.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 15.0 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
38 / 50
Site Preparation————
Site Preparation Worker 5.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck—— HHDT
Grading————
Grading Worker 7.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 41.0 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck—— HHDT
Building Construction————
Building Construction Worker 2.88 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 0.86 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck—— HHDT
Paving————
Paving Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck—— HHDT
Architectural Coating————
Architectural Coating Worker 0.58 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck—— HHDT
Landscaping————
Landscaping Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
39 / 50
Landscaping Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Landscaping Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Landscaping Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 41,974 13,991 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Yards) Material Exported (Cubic Yards) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Building Square Footage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,500 —
Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 —
Grading 0.00 1,633 3.75 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
40 / 50

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Single Family Housing 0.17 100%
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.17 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Single Family
Housing

75.5 76.3 68.4 27,235 580 586 525 209,013
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Single Family Housing —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
41 / 50
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 7
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 1
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
41974.2 13,991 0.00 0.00 457

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Single Family Housing 55,161 532 0.0330 0.0040 306,683
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
42 / 50

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 298,190 1,606,178
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 6.37 —
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Single Family Housing Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
43 / 50

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
44 / 50
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 6.82 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 4.00 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events.

Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
45 / 50
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 1 1 2
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
46 / 50
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 22.2
AQ-PM 65.3
AQ-DPM 82.8
Drinking Water 25.8
Lead Risk Housing 64.4
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 99.6
Traffic 75.1
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 77.0
Groundwater 97.5
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 88.4
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 93.7
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 48.0
Cardio-vascular 54.7
Low Birth Weights 84.3
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 58.1
Housing 45.6
Linguistic 43.3
Poverty 58.5
Unemployment 47.0
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
47 / 50

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 32.15706403
Employed 52.68831002
Median HI 32.92698576
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 51.02014629
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 11.52316181
Transportation —
Auto Access 46.70858463
Active commuting 52.52149365
Social —
2-parent households 20.03079687
Voting 65.61016297
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 26.84460413
Park access 81.35506224
Retail density 88.87463108
Supermarket access 51.14846657
Tree canopy 47.51700244
Housing —
Homeownership 22.86667522
Housing habitability 27.5888618
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 86.05158476 Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
48 / 50
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 31.04067753
Uncrowded housing 19.18388297
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 10.6249198
Arthritis 0.0
Asthma ER Admissions 54.9
High Blood Pressure 0.0
Cancer (excluding skin) 0.0
Asthma 0.0
Coronary Heart Disease 0.0
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 25.3
Cognitively Disabled 13.7
Physically Disabled 55.6
Heart Attack ER Admissions 51.6
Mental Health Not Good 0.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.0
Obesity 0.0
Pedestrian Injuries 64.7
Physical Health Not Good 0.0
Stroke 0.0
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 0.0
Current Smoker 0.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 0.0
Climate Change Exposures —
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
49 / 50
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 40.5
Elderly 86.8
English Speaking 57.4
Foreign-born 57.8
Outdoor Workers 50.5
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 14.3
Traffic Density 78.6
Traffic Access 49.9
Other Indices —
Hardship 69.5
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 13.5

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 79.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 34.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
Courtyard Development Detailed Report, 3/15/2024
50 / 50
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Development of eight two-story single-family residential units (4 bedrooms, 4 baths, inclusive of 432 sqft garage), paved area is approximately 7621 sqft, landscaped area is per LID report 7369 sqft.

Construction: Construction Phases Phase duration per applicant provided 11/26/2023 Construction: Off-Road Equipment All equipment per CalEEMod defaults with exception of Lanscaping equipment per applicant inclusive of one skidsteer, 8 hours/day
Construction: Paving For conservative emissions estimates, driveway is assumed to be 100 asphalt, although permeable pavers may actually be used.

Operations: Water and Waste Water 100% Aerobic wastewater treatment at Long Beach Water Reclamation Plan September 20, 2024
Appendix E
Low Impact Development
Report
Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244

LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT STUDY
(LID)
Project Location:
1933 Temple Ave,
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Prepared for:

SIGNAL VENTURES LLC
821 W TAFT AVE,
ORANGE, CA 92865
Preparation Date
April 04, 2023
Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244 I. Introduction
The project consists of the design and construction of eight new single family houses for BHT Temple Venture, LLC at 2671 Bayshore Dr, Newport Beach, CA 91384. No Infrastructure will be transferred to Public Agencies. No known Significant Ecological Area (SEA).

A. Project Description
The proposed development will drain to underground Cudo to infiltrate.

The proposed project site is approximately 0.598-acres without dedication, with 0.197 acres of impervious area, and 0.401 acres of pervious area.

Total Area = 26,061 SF = 0.598 acres
Building Area = 10,448 SF
Hardscape Area = 1,134 SF
Gravel Driveway = 6,840 SF
Landscape Area = 7,639 SF
This project is a Large-Scale Designated Project, as defined by the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works low Impact Development Standards Manual, dated February 2014 for the following reasons:

Large-Scale Non-Designated Projects – all residential development and redevelopment of five units or greater and all non-residential development or redevelopment. • Where 50 percent or more of the impervious surface of a previously developed site is proposed to be altered and the previous development project was not subject to post-construction stormwater quality control measures, the entire development site (e.g., both the existing development and the proposed alteration) must meet the requirements of the LID Standards Manual.
• Where less than 50 percent of the impervious surface of a previously developed site is proposed to be altered and the previous development project was not subject to post-construction stormwater quality control measures, only the proposed alteration must meet the requirements of the LID Standards Manual.

B. Drainage Characteristics
The drainage area of the project site is approximately 0.598 acres. The area is on a sloped ground. The area is sloping from north toward the south direction. The drainage area is composed of building, driveway, parking and Landscaping. The existing run off is draining towards to south direction from north direction.

With the construction of building & driveway, the proposed drainage system of the area is described as follows:

All of storm water at the front yard, back yard, side yard and driveway will be collected by area drains. All storm water will go through the drain in the landscaping and then through the CUDO system. If the CUDO system is full, stromwater will overflow from the southeast corner catch basin to the street via parkway drain.

Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244 C. Pollutants of Concerns
Pollutants of concern include trash and dried leaves, twigs from the trees and shrubs, silt, pesticides and fertilizers in the planter areas.

II. Best Management Practices (BMPs)
The following is a list of all BMPs to be implemented on site:

A. Structural BMPs

1. Kristar FloGard Catch Basin Filter Insert
Kristar Trench Dain Filter Insert, by Kristar Enterprises, Inc. which will be installed in trench drain, are being proposed as structural BMPs for the removal of silt and debris in storm water runoff.

The filter inserts have been selected to accommodate, up to and including, the 85th percentile storm event.

2. Cudo System
The project will propose to install a cudo system to treat stromwater.

B. Non-structural BMPs
1 Open paved areas and planter areas
a. Regular sweeping of all open and planter areas, at a minimum, on a weekly basis in order to prevent dispersal of pollutants that may collect those surfaces. b. Regular pruning of trees and shrubs in the planter areas to avoid formation of dried leaves and twigs, which are normally blown by the wind during windy days. These dried leaves are likely to clog the surface inlets of the drainage system when rain comes, which would result to flooding of the surrounding area due to reduced flow capacities of the inlets. c. Trash and recycling containers shall be used such that, If they are to be located outside or apart from the principal structure, are fully enclosed and watertight in order to prevent contact of storm water with waste matter, which can be a potential source of bacteria and other pollutants in runoff. These containers shall be emptied and wastes disposed of properly on a regular basis.

2. Education and Training
The owner shall be made aware of the structural BMPs installed in the project. Information materials, such as brochures, shall also be provided for their complete information. The Owner shall also be briefed about chemical management and proper methods of handling and disposal of wastes and should understand the on-site BMPs and their maintenance requirements.

3. Landscaping
Minimize the use of pesticides and fertilizers to the maximum extent practical.

4. Monitoring and Maintenance
a. All BMPs shall be operated, monitored, and maintained for the life of the project and at a minimum, all structural BMPs shall be inspected, cleaned-out, and where necessary, repaired, at Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244 the following minimum frequencies: 1) prior to October 15th each year; 2) during each month between October 15th and April 15th of each year and, 3) at least twice during the dry season (between April 16 and October 14 of each year).
b. Debris and other water pollutants removed from structural BMPs during cleanout shall be contained and disposed of in a proper manner
c. The drainage system and associated structures and BMPs shall be maintained according to manufacturer’s specification to ensure maximum pollutant removal efficiencies.

EXHIBITS
Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244 EXHIBIT 1: GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244

APPENDIX A

LID CALCULATIONS
PRECISE GRADING PLAN FOR THE COURTYARD 1933 TEMPLE AVENUE, SIGNAL HILL, CA 90755 SHEET INDEX TITLE SHEET C-1 PRECISE GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C-2 SECTIONS & DETAILS C-3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-4 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C-5 OWNER SIGNAL VENTURES LLC 821 W TAFT AVE, ORANGE, CA 92865 DESIGN ARCHITECT DCS DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, 2201 E. WILLOW ST, STE D#319 SIGNAL HILL, CA 90755 SOIL ENGINEER R MCCARTHY CONSULTING, INC. 23 CORPORATE PLAZA, SUITE 150 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 949.629.2539 OFFICE CIVIL ENGINEER CORE STRUCTURE, INC. 23172 PLAZA POINTE DRIVE, SUITE #145 LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 (949) 954-7244 BASIS OF BEARING THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE BEARING SOUTH OF A COURSE IN THE STREET CENTERLINE OF TEMPLE AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF THE PRICE & PETERSON TRACT , M.B. 12, PAGE 85. APN: 7216-020-011 APN: 7216-021-002 BENCH MARK CITY OF SIGNAL HILL BENCH MARK NO 055 LOCATION: PACIFIC COAST HWY. & TEMPLE AVE. DESCRIPTION: SE COR. BRASS CAP MON IN WELL 57' S & 22' E/O C.L INT. (3.5' E/O C.F. & 7' S/O B.C.R.) C.L.B. NO. 104 ELEVATION = 77.441' (1985) SURVEY PROVIDED BY GM SURVEYING, SURVEYOR NAME: GEORGE BAJARAS, LIC# PLS 8399 EARTH WORK QUANTITY CUT 1,802 C.Y. FILL 118 C.Y. EXPORT 1,633 C.Y. LOT SIZE: 26,061 SQ-FT TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 8,605 SQ-FT NOTE: QUANTITIES SHOWN HERE ON ARE FOR PERMIT AND/OR BONDING PURPOSE ONLY. SECTION 4216 / 4217 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A DIGALERT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A "PERMIT TO EXCAVATE" WILL BE VALID. FOR YOU DIGALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TOW WORKING DAY BEFORE YOU DIG. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE GENERAL NOTES SITE 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIAL REQUIRED BY THESE PLANS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION," LATEST EDITION, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTS THERETO AS PROMULGATED BY A.G.C. AND A.P.W.A., THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 33 (EXCAVATION AND GRADING) AND ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL. 2. APPLICABLE GEOLOGIC AND/OR SOIL REPORTS WHICH HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL INCLUDING ALL SUPPLEMENTS, ADDENDA, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO ARE INCLUDED AS PART OF THEIR PLANS BY REFERENCE. COPIES OF THESE REPORTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICES OF _________________(CIVIL ENGINEER) AND CITY OF SIGNAL HILL BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT ALL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN MUST BE FOLLOWED. 3. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE PLANS, THE SOIL AND/OR GEOLOGIC REPORTS, CONDITIONS OF THE GRADING PERMIT AND THE SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 2:1 OR FLATTER AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER. 4. PROPOSED STARTING DATE ___________; PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE ____________. 5. ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF CUT _______ CU. YDS. ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF FILL ________ CU. YDS. 6. NO WORK WHATSOEVER SHALL BE STARTED IN OR ABOUT A GRADING PROJECT WITHOUT FIRST GIVING AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING DAYS NOTICE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND THE CIVIL ENGINEER. 7. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES, CONDUITS, OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF THE AVAILABLE RECORDS. TO THE BEST KNOWLEDGE OF THE CIVIL ENGINEER THERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THESE PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER LINES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR FURTHER ASSUMES ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UTILITY PIPES, CONDUITS, OR STRUCTURES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. THE CIVIL ENGINEER TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES AND LINES NO SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 8. THE OWNERS OF POLE LINES, PIPELINES, AND OTHER SUBSTRUCTURES IN THE AREA COVERED BY THESE PLANS SHALL BE NOTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT LEAST TWO (2) WORDING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 9. SECURE PERMISSION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER OF CONSTRUCTION, GRADING AND/OR DISCHARGE OF DRAINAGE WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. 10. THE HOURS OF OPERATION FOR GRADING AND MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PER CITY CODE. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE CONSTRUCTION AREA SUFFICIENTLY DAMPENED TO CONTROL DUST CAUSED BY GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES PROVIDE REASONABLE CONTROL OF DUST CAUSED BY WIND. 12. ALL DEBRIS, EXCAVATED VEGETATION, AND/OR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ARE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ALL EXCAVATED EARTH AND ROCK, REGARDLESS OF ITS SOURCE, NOT USED IN THE PLANNED FILLS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. DEBRIS OR EARTH MUST BE REMOVED TO AN APPROVED FILL SITE, COUNTY DUMP, OR OTHER AUTHORIZED DUMPING LOCATION. 13. THE APPROVED SET OF PLANS, INCLUDING ALL APPROVED REVISIONS THERETO, SHALL BE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL UPON DISCOVERING ANY DISCREPANCIES, ERRORS, OR OMISSIONS IN THE PLANS AND SHALL RECEIVE CLARIFICATION OF THOSE ITEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. 15. NO CHANGES IN THE PLANS WILL BE MADE AND NO EXTRA WORD PERFORMED UNLESS SO APPROVED BY THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND BUILDING OFFICIAL. 16. WHEN EXPANSIVE SOILS AR ENCOUNTERED ON THE SITE, THE SOIL ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSULTED FOR RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO ITS SUITABILITY TO ACCEPT FILL OR TO BE USED AS FILL, OR POSSIBLE REMOVAL FROM BENEATH BUILDING SITES. 17. EXISTING GROUND TO BE FILLED SHALL FIRST BE STRIPPED OF VEGETATION, NONCOMPLYING FILL, OR OTHER INCOMPETENT MATERIAL. NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED UNLESS THE UNDERLYING SOIL OR BEDROCK HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED AND APPROVED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER AND/OR GEOLOGIST. SUBDRAINS WILL BE REQUIRED IN ALL NATURAL DRAINAGE COURSES OR SEEPAGE AREAS TO BE COVERED BY THE FILL, EXCEPT WHERE RECOMMENDED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER OR GEOLOGIST AS NOT BEING NECESSARY. THE LOCATION OF SUBDRAINS MUST BE RECORDED IN PLAN AND ELEVATION AND SHOWN ON "AS BUILT" PLANS. 18. NO ROCK OR SIMILAR MATERIAL GREATER THAN 12" IN DIAMETER WILL BE PLACED IN THE FILL UNLESS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUCH PLACEMENT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER IN ADVANCE AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 19. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE CIVIL ENGINEER, SOIL ENGINEER, ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST, AND BUILDING OFFICIAL AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF ANY REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND/OR TESTS. 20. CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER OR HIS RESPONSIBLE REPRESENTATIVE FOR ALL FILLS THAT WILL EXCEED A VERTICAL HEIGHT OR DEPTH OF THIRTY (30) FEET. 21. FILL IS TO BE COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 90% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY TESTING. (FILL TO BE PLACED IN LEVEL LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING 6" IN DEPTH AND MECHANICALLY COMPACTED WITH SHEEPSFOOT ROLLER, CRAWLER TRACTOR, AND WATER.) 22. TESTS TO DETERMINE FIELD DENSITY OF THE COMPACTED FILL SOILS SHALL BE MADE ON THE BASIS OF NOT LESS THAN ONE TEST FOR EACH 2-FOOT VERTICAL LIFT OF THE FILL BUT NOT LESS THAN ONE TEST FOR EACH 500 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL PLACED. AT LEAST ONE-HALF OF THE REQUIRED TESTS SHALL BE MADE AT THE LOCATION OF THE FINAL FILL SLOPE, EXCEPT THAT NOT MORE THAN ONE SUCH TEST NEED BE MADE FOR EACH 50 HORIZONTAL FEET OF SLOPE IN EACH 2- FOOT VERTICAL LIFT. ADDITIONAL TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED WHERE DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE SOIL ENGINEER OR THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. ALL SUCH DENSITY TEST SHALL BE REASONABLY UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED WITHIN THE FILL OR FILL SLOPE SURFACE. RESULTS OF SUCH TESTING AND LOCATION OF TEST SHALL BE PRESENTED IN THE SOIL ENGINEER'S REPORT. 23. FIELD DENSITY WILL BE DETERMINED AS RECOMMEMDED BY SOIL ENGINEER AND APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 24. SUFFICIENT TESTS OF SOIL PROPERTIES, INCLUDING SOIL TYPES AND SHEAR STRENGTH, SHALL BE MADE DURING GRADING OPERATIONS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH DESIGN CRITERIA. THE RESULTS OF SUCH TESTING SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL UPON THE COMPLETION OF GRADING OPERATION OR WHEN NECESSITATED BY VARYING FIELD CONDITIONS, UPON REQUEST BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 25. GRADING SHALL NOT VARY MORE THAN 0.02 FEET UNDER AREAS TO BE PAVED FOR WALKS, DRIVEWAYS, CURB AND GUTTER, AND BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SLABS. 26. ENGINEER MUST SET GRADE STAKES FOR ALL DRAINAGE DEVICES AND CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN INSPECTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL BEFORE POURING. 27. PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE FOR CONTRIBUTORY DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES. 28. SEPARATE PLANS FOR TEMPORARY DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE USED DURING THE RAINY SEASON WILL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVAL OBTAINED PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1. THE CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON SAID PLANS WILL BE INSTALLED BY NOT LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1, AND MAINTAINED IN OPERABLE CONDITION UNTIL APRIL 15TH. (PLANS ARE TO BE PREPARED BY THE CIVIL ENGINEER.) 29. FINISHED GRADING WILL BE COMPLETED AND APPROVED AND SLOPE PLANTING AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS INSTALLED BEFORE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS. 30. INSPECTION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLS. THE PERMITTEE OR HIS AGENT SHALL NOTIFY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL A MINIMUM OF TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS BEFORE THE GRADING OPERATION IS READY FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS: A. INITIAL INSPECTION: WHEN THE PERMITTEE IS READY TO BEGIN WORK, BUT BEFORE ANY GRADING OR BRUSHING IS STARTED. B. TOE INSPECTION: AFTER THE NATURAL GROUND IS EXPOSED AND PREPARED TO RECEIVE, FILL OUT BEFORE ANY FILL IS PLACED. C. EXCAVATION INSPECTION: AFTER THE EXCAVATION EMPLACEMENT IS STARTED, BUT BEFORE THE VERTICAL DEPTH OF THE EXCAVATION EXCEEDS TEN FEET. D. FILL INSPECTION: AFTER THE FILL EMPLACEMENT IS STARTED, BUT BEFORE THE VERTICAL HEIGHT OF THE LIFTS EXCEEDS TEN FEET. E. DRAINAGE DEVICE INSPECTION: AFTER FORMS AND PIPES ARE IN PLACE, BUT BEFORE ANY CONCRETE IS PLACED. F. ROUGH GRADING: THE SITE WILL BE CONSIDERED READY FOR ROUGH GRADING CERTIFICATION WHEN THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE COMPLETE: a. GRADING TO APPROPRIATE FINAL ELEVATIONS. (+0.10 FT.) b. STAKING OF PROPERTY LINES. c. LOCATION AND GRADIENT OF CUT AND FILL SLOPES. d. LOCATION, CROSS-SECTIONAL CONFIGURATION AND FLOW-LINE GRADIENT OF DRAINAGE SWALES AND TERRACES (GRADING READY FOR PAVING). e. BERMS INSTALLED WHERE INDICATED. f. REQUIRED DRAINAGE SLOPES PROVIDED ON BUILDING PADS. g. APPROVED IRRIGATION SYSTEM PLANS (WHERE REQUIRED). h. RECEIPT OF GRADING INSPECTION CERTIFICATE (ROUGH GRADING). G. FINAL GRADING: THE SITE WILL BE CONSIDERED READY FOR FINAL GRADING CERTIFICATION WHEN THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE COMPLETE: a. ALL REQUIRED DEVICES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. b. SLOPE PLANTING ESTABLISHED AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS PROVIDED c. (WHERE REQUIRED) d. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE FOR DRAINAGE OF SURFACE e. WATERS FOR EACH BUILDING SITE. f. AS GRADED PLAN AND REQUIRED REPORTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. g. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A STATEMENT IN WRITING THAT THE WORK UNDER HIS DIRECTION WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CODE OR WHEREIN SUCH WORK WAS NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUCH PLANS AND CODE (GRADING CONTRACTOR'S STATEMENT). 31. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WILL APPROVE THE WORK INSPECTED OR WILL NOTIFY THE PERMITTEE OR HIS AGENT WHEREIN IF IT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE CODES. 32. ALL EXISTING WATER WELLS SHALL BE CAPPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORDINANCES AND STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL. 33. ALL CISTERNS, CESSPOOLS, SEPTIC TANKS, UNDERGROUND VAULTS, BURIED TANKS, PIPELINES OR SIMILAR UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES FOUND TO EXIST DURING GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR FILLED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 34. ALL ELEVATIONS, CONTOURS, CULTURAL FEATURES AND STRUCTURES SHOWN AS EXISTING ARE SHOWN ACCURATELY AS THEY EXISTED ON (DATE)_____________ AS DETERMINED BY A SURVEY PERFORMED BY _______________________ DATED _____________. 35. THE STOCKPILING OF EXCESS MATERIAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 36. ALL OIL WELLS SHALL BE ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAWS AND THE APPROVALS OF THE DIVISION OF OIL AND GAS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 37. PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL, THE DESIGN CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL CERTIFY TO THE GRADING OPERATION. 38. DIRT ACCESS RAMPS OVER CURB AND GUTTER TO CONSTRUCTION SITES ARE NOT ALLOWED. WHEN NECESSARY FOR ENTRANCE TO SUCH CONSTRUCTION SITES, ASPHALT RAMPS WITH A MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER PIPE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. SEE STANDARD PLAN NO. 234. ALL BASE, GRAVEL, SOIL OR OTHER MATERIAL CARRIED INTO THE ROADWAY BY CONTRACTOR'S PERSONNEL OR EQUIPMENT WILL BE CLEANED AS NECESSARY AND NO LESS THAN ONCE A DAY. TRUCK HAULING, BASE, GRAVEL, FILL OR EXPORT MATERIAL WITHIN CITY LIMITS WILL BE TARPED AS NECESSARY TO PERMIT MATERIALS FROM SPILLING INTO THE ROADWAY. 39. IF AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING ANY PREVIOUSLY UNKNOWN WELLS OR PIPELINES ARE ENCOUNTERED ALL WORK WILL IMMEDIATELY CEASE UNTIL CLEARANCE IS RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT OF OIL AND GAS TO CONTINUE. 40. THE CITY ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE OF APPROVAL ON THESE PLANS SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE DESIGN CIVIL ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR AND OWNER FROM THE COMPLIANCE WITH STATE, COUNTY AND CITY CODES. THE DESIGN CIVIL ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR: CONFIRMING AND CORRELATING ALL DESIGN FEATURES, SPECIFICATIONS, QUANTITIES, DIMENSIONS AND PERMITS, AND PERFORMING THE WORK IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER. THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN CHECKED BY THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL ONLY FOR CONFORMANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS, AND FOR GENERAL CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN SHOWN THEREON. NO DETAILED MATHEMATICAL CHECK WAS MADE FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE EXISTING OF PROPOSED DIMENSIONS, LINES OR GRADES SHOWN INCLUDING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN. THE CITY ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE OF APPROVAL IS BASED ON CONFORMANCE OF THE PREVIOUS STATEMENTS. 41. CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT. 42. RETAINING WALLS ARE NOT A PART OF THE GRADING PERMIT. A SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED. 43. NOT WITH STANDING ANY OF THE ABOVE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE "CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN" FOR THIS PROJECT INCLUDING ANY MODIFICATIONS MADE FROM THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN. MINIMUM BMP REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS · ERODED SEDIMENTS AND OTHER POLLUTANTS MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE AND MAY NOT BE TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE VIA SHEETFLOW, SWALES AREA DRAINS, NATURAL DRAINAGE COURSES OR WIND. · STOCKPILES OR EARTH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS MUST BE PROTECTED FROM BEING TRANSPORTED FROMT HE SITE BY THE FORCE OF WIND AND WATER. · FUELS, OILS, SOLVENTS AND OTHER TOXIC MATERIALS MUST BE STORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LISTING AND ARE NOT TO CONTAMINATE THE SOIL AND SURFACE WATERS. ALL APPROVED STORAGE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROMT HE WEATHER. SPILLS MUST BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED OF IN A PROPER MANNER. SPILLS MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. · NON-STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE WASHING AND ANY OTHER ACTIVITY SHALL BE CONTAINED AT THE PROJECT SITE. · EXCESS OR WASTE CONCRETE MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY OR ANY OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE TO RETAIN CONCRETE WASTES ON SITE UNTIL THEY CAN BE DISPOSED OF AS SOLID WASTE. · TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED SOLID WASTES MUST BE DEPOSITED INTO A COVERED RECEPTACLE TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF RAINWATER AND DISPERSAL BY WIND. · SEDIMENTS AND OTHER MATERIALS MAY NOT BE TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY VEHICLE TRAFFIC. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE RAODWAYS MUST BE STABILIZED SO AS TO INHIBIT SEDIMENTS FROM BEING DEPOSITED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY. ACCIDENTAL DEPOSITIONS MUST BE SWEPT UP IMMEDIATELY AND MAY NOT BE WASHED DOWN BY RAIN OR OTHER MEANS. · ANY SLOPE WITH DISTURBED SOILS OR DENUDED OF VEGETATION MUST BE STABILIZED SO AS TO INHIBIT EROSION BY WIND OR WATER. · ADDITIONAL BMPs WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY CITY INSPECTORS. WM-1 MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE PROVIDE A MATERIAL SOTRAGE AREA WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AND/OR WEATHER PROTETION. NOTE THE MAINTENANCE PRACTICES AND SCHEDULE PROPOSED FOR THIS AREA. WM-2 MATERIAL USE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, FERTILIZERS, PESTICIDES, PLASTERS, SOVENTS, PAINTS, AND OTHER COMPOUNDS MUST BE PROPERLY HANDLED IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE RISK OF POLLUTION OR CONTAMINATION. TRAINING AND INFORMATION ON PROCEDURES FOR THE PROPER USE OF ALL MATERIALS MUST BE AVAILABLE TO THE EMPLOYEES THAT APPLY SUCH MATERIALS. WM-4 SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL IDENTIFY SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL MEASURES THAT WILL BE TAKEN FOR ALL PROPOSED MATERIALS.IDENTIFY THE METHODS, BY WHICH ACCIDENTAL SPILLS WILL BE CLEANED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. WM-5 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROVIDE DESIGNATED WASTE COLLECTION AREAS AND CONTAINERS. ARRANGE FOR REGULAR DISPOSAL. PROVIDE COVERED STORAGE WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. CONTAINERS ARE REQUIRED TO PROTECT WASTE FROM RAIN TO PREVENT WATER POLLUTION AND PREVENT WIND DISPERSAL. WM-6 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED METHODS OF DISPOSAL AND ANY SPECIAL HANDLING CONTRACTS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE. WM-7 CONTAMINATED SOIL MANAGEMENT PREVENT OR REDUCE THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO STORMWATER FROM CONTAMINATED SOIL AND HIGHLY ACIDIC OR ALKALINE SOILS BY CONDUCTING PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS, INSPECTING EXCAVATIONS REGULARLY, AND REMEDIATING CONTAMINATED SOIL PROMPTLY. WM-8 CONCRETE WASTE MANAGEMENT STORE DRY AND WET MATERIALS UNDER COVER. AVOID ON-SITE WASHOUT EXCEPT IN DESIGNATED AREAS AWAY FROM DRAINS, DITCHES, STREETS, AND STREAMS. CONCRETE WASTE DEPOSITED ON SITE SHALL SET-UP, BE BROKEN APART, AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY. CONTAINMENT AND PROPER DISPOSAL IS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONCRETE WASTE. WM-9 SANITARY / SEPTIC WASTE MANAGEMENT UNTREATED RAW WASTEWATER IS NOT TO BE IDSCHARGED OR BURIED. SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES ON SITE ARE REQUIRED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL HEALTH AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. SANITARY OR SEPTIC WASTES MUST BE TREATED OR DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. TC-1 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE A STABILIZED ENTRANCE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION SITES TO ENSURE THAT DIRT AND DEBRIS ARE NOT TRACKED ONTO THE ROAD OR ADJACENT PROPERTY. MAINTENANCE OF SUCH A SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. SUCH STABILIZATION MAY BE OF ROCK OR PAVED. SE-1 SILT FENCE ERODED SEDIMENTS MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE AND NOT SE-3 SEDIMENT TRAP PERMITTED TO ENTER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. MAY BE SE-8 SAND BAGS WAIVED AT THE SOLE DISCRETION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR IF OTHER EROSION CONTROL BMPs ARE DEEMED SUFFICIENT. STORM WATER NOTES: 1. AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE ONLY, AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 200-2 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. PLACEMENT SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 301-2 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND AT THE DEPTH AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 2. A TACK COAT SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL CONTACT SURFACES, INCLUDING ALL AREAS COLD PLANED OR SAWCUT, AND BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE COURSES AT A RATE OF 0.05 GALLON PER SQUARE YARD. TACK COAT SHALL BE AR-1000 PAVING ASPHALT. 3. REMOVE ALL ABANDONED PIPE LINES AND RELOCATE ALL ACTIVE PIPELINES WITHIN 12 INCHES OF BOTTOM OF THE CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE AT NO COST TO THE CITY. 4. THE ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE SHALL BE CLASS B WITH PG 64-10 PAVING ASPHALT. THE ASPHALT CONCRETE FOR THE SURFACE COURSE, ASPHALT CONCRETE TRANSITIONS, LEVELING COURSE AND OVERLAYS SHALL BE CLASS C2 OR D2 WITH PG 64-10 PAVING ASPHALT. 5. a. MINIMUM STRUCTURAL SECTION FOR ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION IS 3' AC/4" CAB. STRUCTURAL SECTION SHALL BE BASED ON THE 'R' VALUE STATED IN THE SOIL REPORT AND A MINIMUM TI = 4.0 b. OFF-SITE (PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) : STREET (LOCAL) MINIMUM - 4" AC/6" CAB, TI = 6.0 ALLEY MINIMUM - 6" PCC/4" CAB, TI = 6.0 SPECIAL DESIGN REQUIRED FOR OTHER STREETS. 6. SPECIAL DESIGN IS REQUIRED WHERE SITE IS USED BY OIL COMPANIES TO SERVICE THEIR FACILITIES AND REQUIRES APPROVAL OF THE OIL COMPANY WITH SIGNATURE ON THE PLANS. PAVING NOTES C-1 NO. DATE INITIAL DESCRIPTION APP. REVISIONS REFERENCES CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SHEET PLAN NUMBER SCALE: DATE APPROVED REVIEWED BY DESIGNED BY R.C.E. NO. 78194 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AS SHOWNEXP 9/30/2025 CITY ENGINEER AMIR DEIHIMI A.L. A.L. 05/23/2024 1933 & 1939 TEMPLE AVENUE THE COURTYARD 22035 OF 5 SHEETS TITLE SHEET 1 EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING N82°48'00"W 56.07' WEST 235.88' NORTH 110.48'
SOUTH 110.48' WEST 235.88'
SOUTH 660.04' 12 THE PRICE & PETERSON TRACT, M.R. 12 - 85 APN: 7216-020-011

TEMPLE AVENUE
219.56' 30' 30' 6 0' 13Por. 11 22Por. THE ALAMITOS TRACT, M.M. BK. 36, PG. 37 EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES REC'D IN BOOK 15730, PAGE 302, O.R. EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES REC'D JANUARY 8, 1931, IN BOOK 10629, PAGE 3, O.R. APN: 7216-021-002 20TH STREET CL 557.8700 SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD ⅊ N89°59'17" E 235.88' ⅊ N00°00'25" E 110.48' ⅊ N00°00'25" E 110.49' ⅊ N89°59'06" E 235.88' 10' 20' 30' SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD 2% 3% SD SD
2%
2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
2%
2% 2%
2% 2% 5% 2% SD SD PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING UNIT-A3 FF=117.00 PAD=116.25 PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING UNIT-A2 FF=116.75 PAD=116.00 PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING UNIT-A1 FF=116.75 PAD=116.00 PROPOSED GARAGE FF=116.50 PROPOSED GARAGE FF=116.25 PROPOSED GARAGE FF=116.25 PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING UNIT- A4 FF = 117.50 PAD=116.75 PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING UNIT-A5 FF=117.50 PAD=116.75 PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING UNIT-A6 FF=117.00 PAD=116.25 PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING UNIT-A7 FF=116.75 PAD=116.00 PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING UNIT-A8 FF=116.75 PAD=116.00 PROPOSED GARAGE FF = 117.00 PROPOSED GARAGE FF=117.00 PROPOSED GARAGE FF=116.50 PROPOSED GARAGE FF=116.25 PROPOSED GARAGE FF=116.25 20% 2% 2% 8% 7% 5%15% 2.3% 2%
2% 5%
1% 2% 2% 2% 12% 7.6%
1% 2%
5% 1% 2% 12.5% 12.5% 5%
1% 3% 2%
1% 9%
1%
1% 2%
5% 3.7%
5%
5% 116.46 FS @ WELL HEAD 118.00 TC 117.50 FS 116.83 FG 118.00 TC 117.50 FS 116.33 FG 116.52 FL 117.32 TC 116.82 FS 116.70 FL 116.33 FG 116.33 FG 116.33 FG 116.08 FG 116.37 FS 116.08 FG 116.08 FG 116.08 FG 115.83 FL-HP 116.08 FG 116.50 FS 116.33 FG 116.25 FS 116.08 FG 116.25 FS 116.08 FG 116.83 FG 116.83 FG 116.68 FL-HP 116.83 FG 116.83 FG 116.08 FG 115.86 FL-HP 116.08 FG 116.08 FG 116.33 FG 116.33 FG 116.08 FG 116.50FS @ WELL HEAD 116.83 FG 115.47 FG 115.53 FG 117.56 FG 116.83 FG (117.50) FS JOINT EXISTING (114.55) FS JOINT EXISTING 116.83 FG 116.83 FG 116.40 FG 116.83 FS 118.00 TC 117.50 FS 116.05 FG 118.00 TC 117.50 FS 116.10 FG 117.92 FG 116.68 FL-HP 116.83 FG 117.33 FS 117.50 TC 117.00 FS 116.08 FG 116.70 FL-HP 116.83 FG 116.83 FG 117.50 TC 117.00 FS 117.50 TC 117.00 FS 117.33 FS 116.68 FL-HP 116.73 FG 117.50 TC 117.00 FS 116.00 FG 116.59 FS 116.36 FG 116.59 FS 116.36 FG 115.90 HP 116.08 FL-HP 117.00 FS 116.83 FG 117.50 TC 116.83 FG 117.50 TC 117.16 FS 117.00 FS 116.83 FG 116.58 FS 116.41 FS 116.24 FG 116.41 FS 116.24 FG 115.66 HP 115.83 FL-HP 5% 12.7% 117.12 HP 2%
2% 117.12 HP 2% 2% 116.92 FL
2% 2% 118.00 TC 117.50 FS5% 2% 117.32 TC 116.82 FS 117.10 FS 117.10 FS 117.10 FS 118.00 TC 117.50 FS 2%

1.5%

0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 116.36 FL

0.5%

2.5% 1% 12% 7.7% 12% 116.91 TC 116.41 FS 116.66 TC 116.16 FS 116.58 FS 116.16 FS 116.66 TC 116.16 FS 116.43 FS 116.18 FS 2% 2%
2% 116.25 FS 116.08 FG 116.68 TC 116.18 FS
2% 116.83 HP 2% 2% 0.5%1% 2% 116.83 FG 118.93 FG 121.10 TC 120.60 FG 2%
2% 1% 10' 10' 6.33'

5.50'

21.17' 7' 18' 9' 2' 7' 18' 9' 2'
20'

5.52'
1%
5% SD
5%
5%
2%
1% 115.64 FG
2% 2% SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD S=0.16 5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5% 116.33 FG 1.5% 116.15 FG 12% 5% 116.08 FG 2% 116.08 FG 6.33' 6.33'

8.50' 116.93 TC 116.43 FS 116.41 FS 116.16 FS 117.68 TC 116.18 FS

8.50' SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD
13% 117.33 FS 2%
5%
5%
1% 1% 117.50 TC 116.83 FG1% 116.53 HP

0.5% 116.33 FG 116.37 FS 116.08 FG 116.50 FS 116.33 FG 116.25 FS 116.08 FG 116.25 FS 116.08 FG 116.83 FS 116.08 FG 116.58 FS 116.91 TC 116.41 FS 116.66 TC 116.16 FS 116.58 FS 116.16 FS 116.66 TC 116.16 FS 116.43 FS 116.18 FS 116.25 FS 116.08 FG 116.68 TC 116.18 FS 5%
5%
5%
5% 116.93 TC 116.43 FS 116.41 FS 116.16 FS 117.68 TC 116.18 FS 5% 5% 5% 6.33'

8.50'
5%
1%

5.17'
5%12.7%
2% 5%5% 116.68 FL-HP
2% 3% 10% 20% 20% 117.92 FG 116.83 FG 116.28 FL 20% 7% 11% 116.50 FL 116.83 FG 116.67 HP 116.83 FG 5%

3.7% 116.67 HP 116.83 FG 5%3.5% SD SD SD
5%SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD 116.59 FS 116.26 FG 116.59 FS 116.26 FG 115.87 HP 3% 116.41 FS 116.08 FG 116.41 FS 116.08 FG 115.68 HP
2% 116.11 FL-HP 116.33 FG 116.16 FG 14%
5%115.86 FL-HP 116.08 FG
5% 115.78 FG 116.08 FG
5% 5% 116.00 FG
5% 2% 116.35 TC 115.98 FS
2% S=0.06 26.76' 116.53 HP 3.7%
2% 115.87 HP 5% 115.68 HP
3% 5% 115.90 HP 5%

2.5%
3% 5% 115.66 HP PRIVATE DRIVEWAY AND FIRE LANE PRIVATE DRIVEWAY AND FIRE LANE 115.87 HP 1% 1% S=0.04 115.98 FS 115.81 FG
2% 0.5% 116.27 FG 5% 4.4%
2% 119.23 HP
7% 119.50 FG 116.12 FG 5% 116.00 FG 115.68 TG 113.43 INV 1 115.37 TG 114.03 INV 1 115.62 TG 114.49 INV 1 2 2 2 115.68 TG 114.93 INV 1 5 116.20 TG 115.15 INV 1 116.10 TG 115.35 INV 5 5 116.23 TG 114.10 INV 1 2 115.70 TG 113.40 INV 1 2 115.65 TG 112.98 INV 1 115.40 TG 112.50 INV 1 115.36 TG 112.00 INV 1 2 116.19 TG 111.31 INV 16 116.08 TG 114.63 INV 1 2 2 2 116.10 TG 115.35 INV 1 116.32 TG 115.20 INV 1 116.32 TG 115.58 INV 1 5 5 5 5 6 2 2 2 8 8 6 11 10 9 2 5 115.84 TG 112.75 INV 7 116.52 TG 112.51 INV 7 115.69 TG 111.83 INV 12 112.30 INV 111.37 INV 13 14 116.30 TG 113.72 INV 1 1 116.20 TG 115.35 INV 115.92 TG 114.64 INV 1 115.85 TG 115.00 INV 2 1 115.92 TG 114.84 INV 1 115.85 TG 114.21 INV 21 115.92 TG 114.37 INV 115.92 TG 114.56 INV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 115.77 TG 112.80 INV 116.20 TG 115.15 INV 1 116.20 TG 115.35 INV 115.92 TG 114.64 INV 1 115.85 TG 115.00 INV 1 115.92 TG 114.84 INV 1 115.85 TG 114.21 INV 1 115.92 TG 114.37 INV 115.92 TG 114.56 INV 2 2 116.53 TG 114.90 INV 1 15 15 116.08 TG 114.63 INV 1 115.65 TG 112.96 INV 1 115.40 TG 112.52 INV 1 115.62 TG 114.51 INV 1 115.37 TG 114.05 INV 1 115.64 TG 111.62 INV 1 (114.07) TC 113.63 INV (113.59) FL S S S S S S S S 2 17 CONSTRUCTION NOTE 1 INSTALL 9" CATCH BASIN WITH 9" SQUARE GRATE NUMBER 980. 2 INSTALL 6" DIA. PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR SDR 35 PIPE DRAIN SYSTEM PER DETAIL ON SHEET C-3. 3 INSTALL 24" x 24" BOTTOMLESS CATCH BASIN PER DETAIL 3 ON SHEET C-3. 4 INSTALL 18" DIA. PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN SYSTEM. 5 CONSTRUCT NEW BUILDING PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN. 6 EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN. 7 INSTALL TRENCH DRAIN. 8 CONSTRUCT NEW WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN. 9 CONSTRUCT NEW DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER SPPWC STD. PLAN 110-2. 10 INSTALL PERMEABLE PAVER ON DRIVEWAY. 11 CONSTRUCT ONE (1) 1'-0" PARKWAY DRAIN PER SPPWC STD 151-2. 12 INSTALL 6" DIA. PVC SCHEDULE 80 PIPE DRAIN SYSTEM. 13 INSTALL CUDO WATER STORAGE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE ACCESS. 14 INSTALL 80 UNIT CUDO STORMWATER INFILTRATION SYSTEM DETAIL SEE SHEET C-3. 15 EXISTING WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED. 16 INSTALL SUMP PUMP AND SUMP PIT WITH ALHAMBRA GRATE. 17 INSTALL NEW SEWER LINE AND CLEANOUTS. LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED CONCRETE AREA PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED PLANTER PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED STORM DRAIN FLOW LINE PROPERTY LINE SEWER LINE SURFACE SLOPE STORM DRAIN SLOPE PAD PROPOSED PAD ELEVATION FS PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE FG PROPOSED FINISHED GROUND FF PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR INV INVERT OF PIPE TG TOP OF GRATE PL PROPERTY LINE TW TOP OF WALL HP HIGH POINT EXIST EXISTING 100 100 100FS SDS X.X% S=X.X SCALE 1"= 10' 20 10 0 10 20 PRECISE GRADING PLAN SCALE 1"=10' NO. DATE INITIAL DESCRIPTION APP. REVISIONS REFERENCES CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SHEET PLAN NUMBER SCALE: DATE APPROVED REVIEWED BY DESIGNED BY R.C.E. NO. 78194 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AS SHOWNEXP 9/30/2025 CITY ENGINEER AMIR DEIHIMI A.L. A.L. 05/23/2024 1933 & 1939 TEMPLE AVENUE THE COURTYARD 22035 OF 5 SHEETS PRECISE GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN PROPOSED EASEMENT NOTES C-2 2 TOP OF GRATE ELEV. PER PLAN SEE NOTES FOR GRATE TYPE FINISH GRADE ADAPTOR 6" PVC RISER (IF NEEDED) 90° PVC ELL. 6" PVC SDR 35 9" MIN. INV. PER PLAN PER PLAN 6" MIN PVC MAIN W/ TEE OR WYE NOTE: 1. ALL FITTINGS BY: NDS, INC. (OR EQUAL) PHONE: 1-800-726-1994 2. REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR FINISH GRADING. 3. DO NOT GLUE GRATE OR RISER TO PIPE. 4. GLUE "I.P.S. WELD ON" #773 SOLVENT (MEDIUM BODIED FAST SET) FOR PIPE THRU 6" Ø. 5. ALL PIPES TO BE 6" Ø PVC SDR 35 . PER PLAN 6" PVC SDR 35 6" PVC RISER (IF NEEDED) OR TOP OF GRATE ELEV. PER PLAN 9" MIN. NDS 6P01 TEE SEE NOTES FOR GRATE TYPE FINISH GRADE PER PLAN INV. PER PLAN INLET DRAIN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 6" PVC SDR 35 2 105 110 115 120 125 110 105 115 120 125 ⅊ EXIST RETAINING WALL ⅊ EXIST SURFACE FF = 117.50' PAD = 116.75' FF = 117.00' PAD = 116.25' ℄ TEMPLE AVENUE 5% EXIST SURFACE OVER-EXCAVATION 8.3% 100 100 2% 9% 9% 17.8% 2% 5% 5% FF = 116.75' PAD = 116.00' FLOW LINE FLOW LINE 3'
3'
3'
3' FLOW LINE FF = 116.75' PAD = 116.00' ⅊ ⅊ ⅊ ⅊ ⅊ 105 110 115 120 125 105 110 115 120 125 ⅊ ⅊ EXIST SURFACE OVER-EXCAVATION 7.5% 5% 5% 7.5% 5% FF = 116.75' PAD = 116.00' FF = 116.75' PAD = 116.00' 3' 5% OVER-EXCAVATION 100 100 0.5% 0.5% 3' FLOW LINE FLOW LINE 6" DIA. PVC RETAINING WALL PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 6" DIA. PVC ⅊ ⅊ ⅊ 100 ⅊ 105 110 115 120 125 105 110 115 120 125 ⅊ ⅊ EXIST SURFACE OVER-EXCAVATION ℄ TEMPLE AVENUE 100 100 EXIST SURFACE 3.7% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% OVER-EXCAVATION 8% FLOW LINE FLOW LINE 1% 1' 18" PERFORATED PIPE
2' 5' 8' 2'-8" 2'
10"
3'-5" 9" PVC DRAIN PIPE BEYOND
1' 18" PERFORATED PIPE 0.5% SLOPE
2'
5' 2'-8" 2'
10" 3'-5" 9" PVC DRAIN PIPE INFILTRATION TRENCH INFILTRATION TRENCH AASTO No 3 8' BOTTOMLESS CATCH BASIN DETAIL 1/4"=1'-0" 3 PEDESTRIAN RATED GRATE PEDESTRIAN RATED GRATE 2" TYP. PERMEABLE PAVEMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PER PLAN SPACING PER MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS (MIN. 10% OPEN SURFACE AREA) OPENING SHALL BE LEFT OPEN OR FILLED WITH 38" WASHED GRAVEL CONCRETE MOW STRIP (PER PROJECT PLANS) ADJACENT PAVEMENT 3' MIN. FROM PUBLIC ROW 4" 2" 12" TO 24" GEOTEXTILE ON BOTTOM AND SIDES TO TOP OF PAVER (SEE NOTE 3) 38" WASHED GRAVEL/ WASH SAND 12" TO 1 12" WASHED GRAVEL 1 12" TO 3" WASHED GRAVEL 2% 4 NO. DATE INITIAL DESCRIPTION APP. REVISIONS REFERENCES CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SHEET PLAN NUMBER SCALE: DATE APPROVED REVIEWED BY DESIGNED BY R.C.E. NO. 78194 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AS SHOWNEXP 9/30/2025 CITY ENGINEER AMIR DEIHIMI A.L. A.L. 05/23/2024 1933 & 1939 TEMPLE AVENUE THE COURTYARD 22035 OF 5 SHEETS SECTION A-A SCALE 1"=10' SECTION B-B SCALE 1"=10' SECTION C-C SCALE 1"=10' SECTIONS & DETAILS CUDO-IN-0001 VARIABLE 3.0000' [36.00"] MINIMUM GEOGRID Ø24.00" MAINTENANCE/INSPECTION ACCESS COVERS TYPICAL. MATERIAL FROM EDGES OF TANK. FIELD POURED CONCRETE COLLAR REQUIRED, BY OTHERS. PERMEABLE PAVER AND GRAVEL PER DETAIL 4 ON SHEET C-3 PERMEABLE PAVERS WRAP ENTIRE SYSTEM WITH PERMEABLE LINER. SEE NOTE 2. TYPICAL CATCH BASIN OR OTHER INLET STRUCTURE PER PLAN. INLET PIPE, Ø8.00" FOR CONNECTION CONFIGURATION REFERENCE CUDO-0008 & CUDO-PIPE-0001. INV. 139.72 NOTES: 1. INSTALL GEOGRID LAYER, (TENSARf SECTION / CUTAWAY VIEW PLAN VIEW CLEAN-OUT ACCESS . 96' 10' INLET INLET CATCH BASIN, PER PLAN. SHEET 1 OF 1 DRAWING NO. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. IT IS SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY INJURIOUS TO THE INTERESTS OF SAID COMPANY. COPYRIGHT © 2018 OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 7921 Southpark Plaza, Suite 200 | Littleton, CO | 80120 | Ph: 800.579.8819 | oldcastlestormwater.com Stormwater Solutionsd DRAWING NO. DATE CUDO-IN-0001 JPR 7/21/08 REV ECO C ECO-0154 ZHD 2/6/18 CUDOd Stormwater Infiltration System - Typical Installation Detail Impermeable Pavement Area Detention/ Infiltration F I D S A U XXXX USA DFI 1154 0010 STORMWATER - 5 7 08 9 - 19 8 F I D S A U XXXX USA DFI 1154 0010 STORMWATER - 5 7 08 9 - 19 8 BACKFILL, 12.00" MINIMUM ABOVE CUDOf SYSTEM, COMPACTED AS REQUIRED BY PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. BACKFILL MATERIAL PER CUSTOMER BEDDING/BACKFILL SPECIFICATION. OPTIONAL GEOGRID BI-AXLE ON GRAVEL OR SAND. (TENSARf BX1200 OR EQUIVALENT) 12.00" MAXIMUM BELOW FINISHED GRADE AT SHALLOWEST POINT. SEE NOTE 1. 12" 12" 12.0000" MINIMUM 2' 4.00" ONE CUDOf MODULE 24" F I D S A U XXXX USA DFI 1154 0010 STORMWATER - 5 7 08 9 - 19 8 1% 3% TG 142.10 HIGH FLOW BYPASS PIPE, Ø12.00" INV. 140.79 RIM ELEV. PER PLAN FS ±142.72 BOTTOM INV.138.72 3/4" CRUSHED DRAIN ROCK OPEN TO DRAIN DRAIN ROCK TO BE LINED WITH 20-MIL HDPE WATER BARRIER ALONG VERTICAL EDGE WITH A 2" WRAP 12" INV.140.35 CONTRACTOR TO DRILL 2 ROWS OF (2) 2" DIA. WEEPHOLES C-3 3 4' EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING N82°48'00"W 56.07' WEST 235.88' NORTH 110.48'
SOUTH 110.48' WEST 235.88'
SOUTH 660.04' 12 THE PRICE & PETERSON TRACT, M.R. 12 - 85 APN: 7216-020-011

TEMPLE AVENUE
219.56' 30' 6 0' 13Por. 11 22Por. THE ALAMITOS TRACT, M.M. BK. 36, PG. 37 EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES REC'D IN BOOK 15730, PAGE 302, O.R. EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES REC'D JANUARY 8, 1931, IN BOOK 10629, PAGE 3, O.R. APN: 7216-021-002 20TH STREET LC 557.8700 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 WM-1
WM-2
WM-3
WM-4
WM-5
WM-8
WM-9 TC-1 SE-10 SE-5 SE-5 SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD ⅊ N89°59'17" E 235.88' ⅊ N00°00'25" E 110.48' ⅊ N00°00'25" E 110.49' ⅊ N89°59'06" E 235.88' 10' 20' 30' SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SE-10 SD SD SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SE-5 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 SE-10 S S S S S S S S SCALE 1"= 10' 20 10 0 10 20 EROSION CONTROL PLAN SCALE 1"=10' NO. DATE INITIAL DESCRIPTION APP. REVISIONS REFERENCES CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SHEET PLAN NUMBER SCALE: DATE APPROVED REVIEWED BY DESIGNED BY R.C.E. NO. 78194 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AS SHOWNEXP 9/30/2025 CITY ENGINEER AMIR DEIHIMI A.L. A.L. 05/23/2024 1933 & 1939 TEMPLE AVENUE THE COURTYARD 22035 OF 5 SHEETS EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-4 4 SECTION A-A A A GRAVEL BAGS (TYP.) MIN. 5" THICK 4" TYP. 2 BAGS MIN GRAVEL BAGS GRAVEL BAG FOR INLETS DETAIL NOT TO SCALE FIBER ROLLS INSTALL A FIBER ROLL NEAR SLOPE WHERE IT TRANSITIONS INTO A STEEPER SLOPE NOTE: INSTALL FIBER ROLL ALONG A LEVEL CONTOUR. VERTICAL SPACING MEASURED ALONG THE FACE OF THE SLOPE VARIES BETWEEN 10' AND 20' FIBER ROLL 8" MIN SLOPE VARIES 34" X 34" WOOD STAKES 12" MIN MAX 4' SPACING
2" MIN
4" MAX FIBER ROLLS DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 4' MAX 4' MAX
4' MAX
4' MAX STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE HARD SURFACE PUBLIC ROAD 30' MIN 6"
MIN 12' MIN FILTER FABRIC 6" THICK 34" AGGREGATE BASE INSTALL TWO TRACK OUT PLATES R20" EROSION CONTROL BMPS EC-1 SCHEDULING SCHEDULE PREPARED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE ON-SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL SE-5 FIBER ROLLS INSTALL WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN. SE-7 STREET SWEEPING AND VACUUMING STREET SHALL BE SWEEPED, SEDIMENT COLLECTED, AND DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE ON A DAILY BASIS. SE-10 STORM WATER INLET PROTECTION ONCE INLET RISERS ARE CONSTRUCTED, SURROUND RISERS WITH GRAVEL BAGS OR CAP THE RISER TO REDUCE SEDIMENT INTRODUCTION TO THE AREA DRAIN SYSTEM. WIND EROSION CONTROL BMPS WE-1 WIND EROSION CONTROL WATER OR COVER MATERIAL SHALL BE USED TO ALLEVIATE DUST NUISANCE ON THE ROUGH GRADED PADS AND ANY STOCKPILE AREAS. TRACKING CONTROL TC-1 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT RUMBLE RACK SHALL BE PLACED ON THE DRIVEWAY TO ENSURE THAT ALL VEHICLES LEAVING THE SITE PASS OVER THE DEVICES BEFORE ENTERING THE PUBLIC STREET. NON-STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NS-6 ILLICIT CONNECTION / ILLEGAL DISCHARGE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ILLICIT CONNECTIONS OR ILLEGALLY DUMPED MATERIALS ON SITE TO THE RESIDENT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY AND CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NO FURTHER ACTION UNTIL THE RESIDENT ENGINEER PROVIDE A RESPONSE/ NS-7 POTABLE WATER / IRRIGATION EXCISE CARE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES. NS-8 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT CLEANING NS-9 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT FUELING NS-3 PAVING AND GRADING OPERATIONS APPLY PARAMETER CONTROLS AND VACUUMING TO PREVENT NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGE. NS-10 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ALL VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT WILL BE MAINTAINED OFF-SITE. NS-12 CONCRETE CURING APPLIES TO ALL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION. NS-13 CONCRETE FINISHING APPLIES TO ALL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION. ALL VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT WILL BE FUELED OFF-SITE. ALL VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT WILL BE CLEANED OFF-SITE. NS-1 WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES MAINTAIN WATER EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES. WASTE MANAGEMENT AND MATERIALS POLLUTION CONTROL WM-3 STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT MATERIALS STOCKPILES SHALL BE SURROUNDED BY A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BARRIER AND COVERED TO MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL. WM-4 SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL AMPLE CLEAN-UP SUPPLIES FOR STORED MATERIALS SHALL BE KEPT ON-SITE. EMPLOYEE SHALL BE EDUCATED ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF SPILLS AND APPROPRIATE RESPONSES. WM-5 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT WM-8 CONCRETE WASTE MANAGEMENT WM-2 MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE MATERIALS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRODUCT DIRECTION. WM-9 SANITARY / SEPTIC WASTE MANAGEMENT ON-SITE FACILITY SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. AN ON-SITE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, USED, AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER WHICH MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE CITY. SOLID WASTE FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STORED IN APPROPRIATE CONTAINERS. FULL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY. WM-1 MATERIAL USE MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE IN ORIGINAL MARKED CONTAINERS AND COVERED FROM RAIN AND WIND. MATERIAL INVENTORY SHALL CONSIST OF SUPPLY REQUIRED FOR A FEW DAYS. NO. DATE INITIAL DESCRIPTION APP. REVISIONS REFERENCES CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SHEET PLAN NUMBER SCALE: DATE APPROVED REVIEWED BY DESIGNED BY R.C.E. NO. 78194 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AS SHOWNEXP 9/30/2025 CITY ENGINEER AMIR DEIHIMI A.L. A.L. 05/23/2024 1933 & 1939 TEMPLE AVENUE THE COURTYARD 22035 OF 5 SHEETS EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C-5 5 Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244 Cudo Calculation
Total Area 0.598 acres
Soil Type 14
Impervious Area 0.2659 acres
Pervious Area 0.3324 acres
Percent Impervious 73.04%
Length of Flow Path 426
85th Percentile 0.6 inch
Q = 0.0338 cfs
V = 583.856 CF
Use 60 unit cudo system.

Total capacity: V-design = 80 x 7.6 CF = 608 CF > 583.856 CF, OK Storage Capacity
2 x 2 x 2 x 95 = 7.6 ft3 (Storage Capacity)
(80 x 3) = 240 CUDO
Infiltration Rate = 0.3 inch. / hr.
= 0.025 ft. / hr.

Drain in 96 hrs. = 0.025 ft. / hr. x 96 hr.
= 2.4 ft.

Area (infiltration) = V / 4.08 ft.
= 583.856 ft3 / 4.08 ft.
= 143.10 ft2
Area proposed > Area required
240 ft2 > 143.10 ft2
Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244

APPENDIX B

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan
for
1933 Temple Avenue
Signal Hills, CA 90755
Tract No. 29304
APN: 7216-020-011
Owner:

Signal Venture, LLC
821 W Taft Ave
Orange, CA 92865
Operations and Maintenance Plan
BMP
Applicable?
Yes/No
BMP Name
and BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance,
and Inspection Frequency
and Schedule
Person or Entity with
Operation & Maintenance
Responsibility
Non-Structural Source Control BMPs
Yes Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Practical information material will be provided to the owner on general good housekeeping practices for each type of site occupancy that contributes to protection of storm water quality.

Before Occupancy Owners
Yes Activity Restriction
No car washing will be permitted on the premises. No changing of oil or other auto repairs will be permitted on the premises. Do not sweep grass clippings, dead leaves into catch basins, or other landscaping related debris into catch basins.

Do not perform paint cleanup activities in paved areas or allow rinse water from these activities to enter the storm drain system. Clean brushes containing water-based paint in a sink that is connected to the sanitary sewer system. Do not use detergents or other chemical additives when washing concrete sidewalks or building exteriors, use potable water only and collect wash water runoff using a vacuum truck, for proper offsite disposal. Keep premises, as well as trash container areas, free of litter.

When buy the property Owners
Yes Common Area Landscape Management
Management of landscaped areas shall be performed consistent with the following: “Management Guidelines for Use of Fertilizers and Pesticides” ongoing Owners
Yes BMP Maintenance
The responsible party (owner, agency name, phone number, and address) for implementation of each non-structural BMP and scheduled cleaning of all structural BMP controls shall be identified in this LID During Original installation and yearly
Owners
Operations and Maintenance Plan
BMP
Applicable?
Yes/No
BMP Name
and BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance,
and Inspection Frequency
and Schedule
Person or Entity with
Operation & Maintenance
Responsibility
No Title 22 CCR Compliance
Insert BMP narrative.

No Spill Contingency Plan
Insert BMP narrative.

No Underground Storage Tank Compliance
Insert BMP narrative.

No Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance
Insert BMP narrative.

No Uniform Fire Code Implementation
Insert BMP narrative.

No Common Area Litter Control
Insert BMP narrative.

No Employee Training
Insert BMP narrative.

No Housekeeping of Loading Docks
Insert BMP narrative.

Yes Common Area Catch Basin Inspection
owner to have privately owned catch basins cleaned and maintained, as frequently as necessary, to prevent sediment, garden waste, and trash, or other pollutants from entering the public streets and storm drain systems
yearly Owners
Yes Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots
Drive aisles and parking lots shall be swept on a regular basis using a vacuum sweeper to reduce the discharge of pollutants into the storm drain system from paved surfaces.
ongoing Owners
No Retail Gasoline Outlets
Insert BMP narrative.

Operations and Maintenance Plan
BMP
Applicable?
Yes/No
BMP Name
and BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance,
and Inspection Frequency
and Schedule
Person or Entity with
Operation & Maintenance
Responsibility
Structural Source Control BMPs
No Provide Storm Drain System Stenciling and Signage
Insert BMP narrative.

Yes Design and Construct Outdoor Material Storage Areas to Reduce Pollutant Introduction Procedures and practices for the proper handling and storage of materials in a manner that minimizes or eliminates the discharge of these materials to the ground, storm drain system or to watercourses.

During construction Owners
Yes Design and Construct Trash and Waste Storage Areas to Reduce Pollutant Introduction Trash and Waste management procedures and practices are designed to minimize or eliminate the discharge of pollutants offsite, to the ground, drainage systems or watercourses.

During construction Owner
No Use Efficient Irrigation Systems & Landscape Design
Insert BMP narrative.

No Protect Slopes and Channels and Provide Energy Dissipation Insert BMP narrative.

No Loading Docks
Insert BMP narrative.

No Maintenance Bays
Insert BMP narrative.

Yes Vehicle Wash Areas
Vehicle cleaning procedures and practices are used to minimize or eliminate the discharge of pollutants from vehicle and equipment cleaning operations to the ground, storm drain system or to watercourses.

During construction Owners
No Outdoor Processing Areas
Insert BMP narrative.

Operations and Maintenance Plan
BMP
Applicable?
Yes/No
BMP Name
and BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance,
and Inspection Frequency
and Schedule
Person or Entity with
Operation & Maintenance
Responsibility
Yes Equipment Wash Areas
equipment cleaning procedures and practices are used to minimize or eliminate the discharge of pollutants from vehicle and equipment cleaning operations to the ground, storm drain system or to watercourses.

During construction Owners
Yes Fueling Areas
Vehicle and equipment fueling procedures and practices are designed to minimize or eliminate the discharge of fuel spills and leaks onto the ground (impervious or pervious site surfaces) or into storm drain systems or to watercourses.

During construction Owners
No Hillside Landscaping
Insert BMP narrative.

No Wash Water Controls for Food Preparation Areas
Insert BMP narrative.

No Community Car Wash Racks
Insert BMP narrative.

Treatment Control BMPs
Yes Treatment Control BMP # 1
Cudo infiltration system
During Original installation and yearly
Owners
Exhibit A, Operations and Maintenance Plan

Page 5 of 7 ends

Forms to Record BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection The form that will be used to record implementation, maintenance, and inspection of BMPs is attached.

Cudo Operations and Maintenance Manual
See attached.

Operations and Maintenance Manual
(Underground Retention / Detention / Infiltration /
Water Reuse Systems)
CUDO® CUBES
Description / Basic Function
CUDO is a modular stormwater system comprised of a grouping of modular polypropylene or concrete cubes that when constructed form an underground storage area for stormwater. This system can be used for infiltration, retention, detention or water reuse. CUDO can help achieve runoff detainment and storage to help attenuate the peak flow to pre-construction levels and can help conform to current Low Impact Development requirements.

Infiltration
The purpose of a CUDO infiltration system is to capture stormwater runoff, store the runoff, and then allow it to percolate into the ground via the open space area of the cubes and perforations in the side wall. The system is backfilled with a Class I material defined by ASTM D2321 as a cleaned open graded rock or a Class II permeable sand. The rock or sand provide additional storage capacity but also allow for a percolation interface with the native material. The ground water is “recharged” with this type of system.

Detention
The purpose of a CUDO detention system is to capture stormwater runoff, store the runoff, and then allow it to be released at a controlled rate through an appropriately sized orifice control. A detention system helps attenuate the peak flow from the site assuring that pre-development runoff flows are not exceeded as a result of the development. A CUDO detention requires the cubes to be encapsulated with an impermeable liner for the polypropylene system or the seams of the concrete system to be sealed with a water proof mastic.

Retention
A CUDO retention system is a hybrid system. It is a combination of a detention system and an infiltration system. A retention system is utilized to attenuate peak flow as well as promote groundwater re-charge. A retention system is outfitted with an overflow pipe at the top of the system which allows the system to fill for infiltration but also outlet if the ground is saturated.

Water Reuse
The purpose of a water-reuse CUDO system is to capture and store water for future use. The system is constructed in a similar fashion to a detention system but instead of a controlled outlet the system is constructed with an emergency overflow. A water reuse system is a Low-Impact Development (LID) device that helps attenuate peak flows as well as conserve water. Water may be reused through an active pump system or passive irrigation.

Inspection/Cleanout Ports
Inspection and cleanout ports are 18-inch diameter vertical risers connected to the uppermost polypropylene CUDO cubes or up to 30-inch manhole access connected to the concrete CUDO. They are used for entrance into the system, or for access to place vacuum truck hoses or water-jetting devices or CCTV equipment. Ports are strategically located near inlet and outlet pipes and in other areas or probable deposition in the system. It is recommended to keep surface level access lids sealed and bolted at all times when the system is in service.

Inlet Bay
Some systems are configured so that pretreatment of the stormwater occurs within the CUDO system. In this case, the CUDO system will house an inlet bay. The inlet bay is separated from the rest of the CUDO system by sidewall plugs and is intended to separate gross pollutants, trash and debris and floatables from the CUDO system and pretreatment device. The bay contains its own sump area and unique access ports.

CUDO® Stormwater Cube - Modular Stormwater Systems
2 3
Maintenance Overview for CUDO
State and Local regulations require that stormwater storage systems be maintained and serviced on a recurring basis.

The purpose of maintaining a clean and obstruction free CUDO system is to ensure the system performs the intended function of the primary design. Trash and debris, floatables, gross pollutants and sediment can build up in the CUDO leading to clogging of the native soil interface or blockage of the inlet or outlet pipes. This can cause the system to function improperly by limiting storage volume, limiting the design percolation rates or impeding flow in and out of the system. Downstream and upstream, areas could run the risk of flooding and deleterious environmental impact.

Recommended Frequency of Service
It is recommended that the CUDO stormwater systems be serviced on a regularly occurring basis. Ultimately the frequency depends on the amount of runoff, pollutant loading, and interference from trash, debris and gross pollutants as well as proper maintenance of upstream pretreatment devices. However, it is recommended that each installation be inspected at least two times per year to assess service needs.

Recommended Timing of Service
Guidelines for the timing of service are as follows:

1. For areas with a definite rainy season the system should be serviced prior to and following the rainy season.

2. For areas subject to year-round rainfall service should occur on a regularly occurring basis. (A minimum of two times per year.)

3. For areas with winter snow and summer rain the system should be serviced prior to and after the snow season.

4. For installed devices that are subject to dry weather flows only (i.e. wash racks, parking garages, etc…) the unit should be serviced on a regularly occurring basis. (A minimum of two times per year.) Inspection
An inspection should be performed when the system is new. This allows the owner to establish a baseline condition for comparison to future inspections. Sediment build up can typically be monitored without entering the system. (No confined space entry.) Initial and subsequent inspection data should be recorded and filed for reference. Some regulatory agencies require that the results of the inspections be documented and reported. Inspection reports should comply with regulatory requirements and be submitted as required.

Inspection Procedures

5. Locate the inspection, cleanout and access ports. Inspection and cleanout ports are typically 18-inch diameter.

Access ports are typically 24-inch or 30-inch diameter. Pictures should be taken to document the location or a site map should be generated to detail the as-built locations of the ports.

6. Unbolt and remove the access port lids.

7. Insert a measuring device into the opening making note of a point of reference to determine the quantity of sediment and other accumulated material. If access is required to measure, ensure only certified confined space entry personnel having appropriate equipment are allowed to enter the system.

8. In addition, for accessible concrete CUDO systems personnel should utilize appropriate confined space entry procedures to enter the system and photograph its condition.

9. Inspect inlet and outlet locations for obstructions. Obstructions should be removed at this time.

10. Inspect the structural components of the system.

11. Fill in the CUDO Inspection/Maintenance Data Sheet and send a copy to the regulatory agency if necessary.

Disinfection of Water Reuse System
Periodic disinfection of water held for reuse may be required to abate bacteria and algae growth. This may be done using calcium hypochlorite tablets or by the addition of an ozone generator in a small recirculation system. 4 Maintenance
Cleanout of the CUDO system should be considered if there is sediment buildup of two or more inches at over 50% of the inspection ports. Cleaning shall be performed if sediment buildup is two inches or more over 75% of the system floor. In the event of a spill of a foreign substance, cleanout of the system should be considered.

Maintenance Procedures

1. Locate the inspection, cleanout and access ports. Inspection and cleanout ports are typically 18-inch diameter. Access ports are typically 24-inch or 30-inch diameter. Pictures should be taken to document the location or a site map should be generated to detail the as-built locations of the ports.

2. Unbolt and remove the access port lids.

3. Measure the sediment buildup at each port. If access is required to measure ensure only certified confined space entry personnel having appropriate equipment are allowed to enter the system.

4. A thorough cleaning of the system (inlets, outlets, ports, and inlet bays) shall be performed by either a vacuum truck or by manual methods.

5. Inspect inlet and outlet locations for obstructions. Obstructions should be removed at this time.

6. Inspect the structural components of the system.

7. Fill in the CUDO Inspection/Maintenance Data Sheet and send a copy to the regulatory agency if necessary.

Inspection / Maintenance Requirements
Below are some recommendations for equipment and training of personnel to inspect and maintain a CUDO system.

Personnel: OSHA Confined Space Entry Training is a prerequisite for entrance into a system. In the state of California personnel should be CalOSHA certified.

Equipment: Record Taking (pen, paper, voice recorder)
Proper Clothing (appropriate footwear, gloves, hardhat, safety glasses, etc.) Flashlight
Tape Measure
Measuring Stick
Pry Bar
Traffic Control (flagging, barricades, signage, cones, etc.) First Aid Materials
Debris and Contaminant Containers
Vacuum Truck
Disposal of Gross Pollutants, Hydrocarbons, and Sediment The collected gross pollutants, hydrocarbons, and sediment shall be offloaded from the vacuum truck into DOT approved containers for disposal. Once in the container the maintenance contractor has possession and is responsible for disposal in accordance with local, state and federal agency requirements.

Note: As the generator, the landowner is ultimately responsible for the proper disposal of the collected materials.

Because the material likely contains petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and other harmful pollutants, the materials must be treated as EPA class 2 Hazardous Waste. Proper disposal is required. www.oldcastlestormwater.com
800-579-8819

BUILDING

STRUCTURES

OUR MARKETS

TRANSPORTATION
WATER

COMMUNICATIONS ENERGY
CUDO® CUBES

RECORD OF BMP IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE, AND INSPECTION Today’s Date:

Name of Person Performing Activity
(Printed):

Signature:

BMP Name
(As Shown in O&M Plan)
Brief Description of Implementation, Maintenance, and
Inspection Activity Performed
Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244

APPENDIX C

EDUCATION MATERIAL
Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244 Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244 Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244 Core Structure, Inc., 23172 Plaza Pointe Dr., Suite 145, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-954-7244 Attachment A
Response to Comments
Commentor Comment Response Changes made in EIR
Department of Toxic
Substances
Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Soil Management Plan states, “A Soil Management Plan shall be developed in consultation with the appropriate regulatory authorities and the remedial action agreed action shall be completed.” A SMP alone cannot sufficiently identify and document the potential contaminants that may pose a threat to human health and the environment. DTSC recommends that a cleanup plan, a Removal Action Workplan (RAW) or Remedial Action Plan (RAP), be prepared to adequately address all site impacts after complete characterization.

Comments made on Mitigation measures - RAP or RAW to be used instead of SMP. Signal Hill Development plan states that a soil management plan be developed. This soil management plan is a blanket term used to describe actions associated with any potential remediaion. MM HAZ-1 Notes that " A Soil Management Plan shall be developed in consultation with the appropriate regulatory authorities and the remedial action agreed upon shall be completed. Work shall not resume in the affected area until appropriate actions have been implemented in accordance with the remediation plan." The mitigation measure will be futher clarified to include the SMP and RAP process and applicable oversight agency.

3.10.2 - MM HAZ-1: MM HAZ-1: Soil Management Plan and Remedial Action Plan.

Prior to initiating any ground disturbing activities on the Project Site, the project applicant shall prepare a Soil Management Plan (SMP) that is submitted to and reviewed and approved by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB), the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) Site Mitigation Unit (SMU), or other applicable regulatory agency having jurisdiction to review or approve the SMP. The SMP shall be prepared by a Registered Environmental Assessor or other qualified expert, and shall address the findings previous site investigations and radiation actions conducted at the site, and/or subsequent relevant studies. During construction, the contractor shall implement the SMP. If unidentified or suspected contaminated soil or groundwater evidenced by stained soil, noxious odors, or other factors, is encountered during site preparation or construction activities on any portion of the Project Site, work shall stop in the excavation area of potential contamination. Upon discovery of suspect soils or groundwater, the contractor shall notify the applicable regulatory agency, and retain a Registered Environmental Assessor or other qualified professional to collect soil samples to confirm the type and extend of contamination that may be present.

If contamination is confirmed to be present, any further ground disturbing activities within areas of identified or suspected contamination shall be conducted according to a site-specific Remedial Action Plan (RAP), prepared by a qualified professional. The contractor shall follow all procedural direction given by the applicable regulatory agency, and in accordance with the RAP to ensure that suspect soils are isolated, protected from runoff, and disposed of in accordance with transport laws and the requirements of the licensed receiving facility. If contaminated soil or groundwater is encountered and identified constituents exceed human health risk levels, ground disturbing activities shall not recommence within the contaminated areas until remediation is complete and a “no further action” letter is obtained from the appropriate regulatory agency or direction is otherwise given from the appropriate regulatory agency for a course of action that would allow that construction to recommence within any such areas. The project applicant shall submit the “no further action” letter or notification documenting direction from the regulatory agency to the City prior to resumption of any ground disturbing activity on the relevant portion of the Project Site. If compounds in soil are identified in concentrations that trigger SCAQMD’s Rules 1166 or 1466, the SMP will require compliance with such rules.

Department of Toxic
Substances
The City of Signal Hill and the South Coast Air Quality Management District are indicated as appropriate reporting agencies but are not recognized as appropriate oversight. Consultation should occur with proper oversight therefore, DTSC recommends the City of Signal Hill enter into a voluntary agreement to address contamination at brownfields and other types of properties or receive oversight from a self-certified local agency, DTSC or the Regional Water Quality Control Board. If entering into one of DTSC’s voluntary agreements, please note that DTSC uses a single standard Request for Lead Agency Oversight Application for all agreement types. Please apply for DTSC oversight using this link: Request for Agency Oversight Application. Submittal of the online application includes an agreement to pay costs incurred during agreement preparation. If you have any questions about the application portal, please contact your Regional Brownfield Coordinator.

At this time no remedial action will be required and therefore no oversite will be necessary. In the event of identified soil needing remediation consultation would occur with the DTSC, RWQCB, or a self-certified local agency (Los Angeles County).

Addressed in previous comment, see directly above.

Department of Toxic
Substances
DTSC recommends that all imported soil and fill material should be tested to assess any contaminants of concern meet screening levels as outlined in DTSC's Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) Guidance Manual. Additionally, DTSC advises referencing the DTSC Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material Fact Sheet if importing fill is necessary. To minimize the possibility of introducing contaminated soil and fill material there should be documentation of the origins of the soil or fill material and, if applicable, sampling be conducted to ensure that the imported soil and fill material are suitable for the intended land use. The soil sampling should include analysis based on the source of the fill and knowledge of the prior land use. Additional information can be found by visiting DTSC’s Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) webpage.

No soil will be imported as a result of the project. 1,802 Cubic Yards of material will be cut from the Project Site. All cut soil to be used onsite as fill material shall be tested using screening levels as outlined in DTSC's Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) Guidance Manual before use.

Approximately 1,633 Cubic yards of soil will be exported as a result of grading activities. This clarification will be reflected in the document.

2.2 - Cut material will be stockpiled on site to be used for necessary fill activities, eliminating the need to import soil. All stockpiled soil to be used for “fill” activities shall be tested to assess potential contaminants of concern that meet screening levels as outlined in DTSC's Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) Guidance Manual before use.

Los Anageles County
Sanitation Districts
The wastewater flow originating from the proposed project will discharge directly to the Districts’ Alamitos Pumping Plant Trunk Sewer, located in Temple Avenue north of East 19th Street. The Districts’ 8–inch diameter trunk sewer has a capacity of 1.1 million gallons per day (mgd) and conveyed a peak flow of 0.3 mgd when last measured in 2021. A 6-inch diameter or smaller direct connection to a Districts’ trunk sewer requires a Trunk Sewer Connection Permit issued by the Districts. An 8-inch diameter or larger direct connection to a Districts’ trunk sewer requires submittal of Sewer Plans for review and approval by the Districts. For additional information, please contact the Districts’ Engineering Counter at (562) 908-4288, extension 1205, or [email protected].

Information will be included in the ISMND 1.5.5Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD) Permit Alamitos Pumping Plant Trunk Sewer
Wastewater flow originating from the proposed project will discharge directly to the District’s Alamitos Pumping Plant Trunk Sewer, located in Temple Avenue north of East 19th Street. The District(s) 8–inch diameter trunk sewer has a capacity of 1.1 million gallons per day (mgd) and conveyed a peak flow of 0.3 mgd when last measured in 2021. A 6-inch diameter or smaller direct connection to a District’s trunk sewer requires a Trunk Sewer Connection Permit issued by the District(s). An 8-inch diameter or larger direct connection to a District’s trunk sewer requires submittal of Sewer Plans for review and approval by the District(s).

Los Anageles County
Sanitation Districts
The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be treated at the A.K. Warren Water Resource Facility (formerly known as the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant) located in the City of Carson, which has a capacity of 400 mgd and currently processes an average flow of 247.2 mgd.

The ISMND will be ammended with this updated information Revised 3.20.1.2 to reflect data changes Los Anageles County
Sanitation Districts
The expected increase in average wastewater flow from the project, described in the plan as a subdivision of one lot to nine lots, is 1,728 gallons per day, after all structures on the project site are demolished. For a copy of the Districts’ average wastewater generation factors, go to www.lacsd.org, under Services, then Wastewater Program and Permits and select Will Serve Program, and click on the Table 1, Loadings for Each Class of Land Use link.

The ISMND will be amended with this updated information. There will be a total of eight (8) units as a result fo the Project and therefore the expected increase in average wastewater flow from the project, described in the plan as a subdivision of one lot to eight lots, is 1248 gallons per day using the SDLAC’s wastewater generation factor of 156 gallons per day per residential unit.

Revised 3.20.1.2 and 3.20.2 reflect data changes
Los Anageles County
Sanitation Districts
The Districts are empowered by the California Health and Safety Code to charge a fee to connect facilities (directly or indirectly) to the Districts’ Sewerage System or to increase the strength or quantity of wastewater discharged from connected facilities. This connection fee is used by the Districts for its capital facilities.

Payment of a connection fee may be required before this project is permitted to discharge to the Districts’ Sewerage System. For more information and a copy of the Connection Fee Information Sheet, go to https://www.lacsd.org/services/wastewater-sewage/wastewater-rates. In determining the impact to the Sewerage System and applicable connection fees, the Districts will determine the user category (e.g.

Condominium, Single Family Home, etc.) that best represents the actual or anticipated use of the parcel(or facilities on the parcel(s) in the development. For more specific information regarding the connection fee application procedure and fees, please contact the Districts’ Wastewater Fee Public Counter at [email protected] or (562) 908-4288, extension 2727.

The Applicant has been made aware that a fee may be incurred when connecting faciltiies to the district sewage system or to increase the strength or quantity of wastewater discharged from connected facilities.

No Changes Made.

Los Anageles County
Sanitation Districts
In order for the Districts to conform to the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the capacities of the Districts’ wastewater treatment facilities are based on the regional growth forecast adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Specific policies included in the development of the SCAG regional growth forecast are incorporated into clean air plans, which are prepared by the South Coast and Antelope Valley Air Quality Management Districts in order to improve air quality in the South Coast and Mojave Desert Air Basins as mandated by the CAA. All expansions of Districts’ facilities must be sized and service phased in a manner that will be consistent with the SCAG regional growth forecast for the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, and Imperial. The available capacity of the Districts’ treatment facilities will, therefore, be limited to levels associated with the approved growth identified by SCAG.

As such, this letter does not constitute a guarantee of wastewater service, but is to advise the applicant that the Districts intend to provide this service up to the levels that are legally permitted and to inform the applicant of the currently existing capacity and any proposed expansion of the Districts’ facilities.

It is noted that service will be provided up to the levels that are legally permitted. No Changes Made.

California
Department of
Transportation
The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment. Senate Bill 743 (2013) has codified into CEQA law and mandated that CEQA review of transportation impacts of proposed development be modified by using Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the primary metric in identifying transportation impacts for all future development projects. You may reference the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) for more information:
https://opr.ca.gov/ceqa/#guidelines-updates
As a reminder, VMT is the standard transportation analysis metric in CEQA for land use projects after July 1, 2020, which is the statewide implementation date.

VMT is utilized as the standard transportaton analysis metric for this Project No Changes Made.

California
Department of
Transportation
Caltrans is aware of challenges that the region faces in identifying viable solutions to alleviating congestion on State and Local facilities. With limited room to expand vehicular capacity, this project should incorporate multimodal and complete streets transportation elements that will actively promote alternatives to car use and better manage existing parking assets. Prioritizing and allocating space to efficient modes of travel such as bicycling and public transit can allow streets to transport more people in a fixed amount of right-of-way.

Each residential unit will have a garage in which alternative modes of transportation can be stored.

Several Long Beach Transit routes serve the Project Site, including: Routes 71/72 along Orange Avenue, Routes 21/22 along Cherry Avenue, and Route 102/104 along Willow Street. Per Section

21.48 of the City of Signal Hill Municipal Code, new development projects are required to provide funds for the acquisition, improvement, and expansion of street, parkway, thoroughfare, intersection, and other traffic and circulation improvements. This ordinance is intended to authorize reasonable fees to be collected related to new development so that the burdens of installing public improvements, the need for which is created by certain new development projects and which will benefit certain land in addition to such development projects. In addition to this, measures for construction traffic control must be met to ensure safety during work hours, stating that all work areas, lane closures, and all warning lights, flashers and devices used shall be protected, installed and provided in accordance with the current Caltrans Manual of Traffic Controls and/or Work Area Traffic Control Handbook.

No Changes Made.

California
Department of
Transportation
Caltrans encourages city planning that promotes complete streets and pedestrian safety through measures like road diets, recognized for enhancing safety and being cost-effective when combined with street resurfacing. City planning should focus on reducing single-occupancy vehicle trips, improving safety, lowering vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

It is noted that CalTrans encourages cities to reduce single-occupancy vehicle trips, improving safety, lowering vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

No Changes Made.

California
Department of
Transportation
The project’s construction activities are expected to generate a maximum of 60 additional daily vehicle trips (30 round trips) and around 1,163.2 VMT per day, due to the movement of workers and heavy-duty trucks to and from the site. These trips are temporary and will cease once construction ends, without impacting operational traffic. As stated in the OPR Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018), projects generating fewer than 110 daily trips typically result in less-than-significant transportation impacts; therefore, the project’s impact would be minimal.

This data is consistent with the ISMND as written. It is noted that this is consistent with a less-thansignificant transportation impact.No Changes Made.

California
Department of
Transportation
Once constructed, the project is expected to generate a maximum of 76.32 trips per day, resulting in approximately 585.71 VMT per day. Per OPR's Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018), projects generating fewer than 110 daily trips typically pose a less-than-significant transportation impact unless substantial evidence indicates otherwise. Since the project falls well below this threshold, it is anticipated to have minimal long-term impacts on transportation and circulation.

This data is consistent with the ISMND as written. It is noted that this is consistent with a less-thansignificant transportation impact.No Changes Made.

California
Department of
Transportation
As a reminder, any transportation of heavy construction equipment and/or materials which require use of oversized transport vehicles on State highways will need a Caltrans transportation permit. We recommend largesize truck trips be limited to off-peak commute periods. Truck drivers should cover construction trucks with tarpaulin to avoid debris spillage onto the State Highway.

Discussion of an oversized/overweight vehicles permit is added in the 1.5 Required Permits/Approvals and Responsible Agencies.

1.5.6 California Department of Transportation: Oversize/overweight vehicles The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has discretionary authority with respect to highways under its jurisdiction and may, upon application and if good cause appears, issue a special permit to operate or move a vehicle or combination of vehicles or special mobile equipment of a size or weight of vehicle or load exceeding the maximum limitations specified in the California Vehicle Code. The Caltrans Office of Commercial Vehicle Operations is responsible for the issuance of these special transportation permits for oversize/overweight vehicles on the State Highway System.

California
Department of
Transportation
We recommend large-size truck trips be limited to off-peak commute periods. Per City of Signal Hill Municipal Code Section 9.15.050, construction activities are restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays. Additional reccommendations for truck trips associated with hauling of construction debris and cut material during off-peak hours to the extent feasible are added in Section 2.2 Project Construction.

2.2 Project Construction: Truck trips associated with hauling construction debris and cut material will be scheduled for off-peak hours to the extent feasible.

California
Department of
Transportation
Truck drivers should cover construction trucks with tarpaulin to avoid debris spillage onto the State Highway. Notes on transportation of debris are added in Section 2.2 Project Construction. 2.2 Project Constructution: Transportation of debris materials on highways will be covered with Tarpaulin or similar material to reduce debris spillage.

Courtyard ISMND - Responses to Comments

← All documents from this meeting