Cities Index.
Staff Report

Simi Valley City Council
November 17, 2025

Document
Staff Report
Meeting
November 17, 2025
Body
Simi Valley City Council
Original file
2.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on simivalley.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

CITY OF

SIMI VALLEY

STAFF REPORT
November 1
7, 2025
To: City Coun
cil
From: Publ
ic Works Department
Ron Fuchiwaki, Director of Public Works
Subject: A dop
t a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute and file the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Transportation Development Act claim to receive the funding allocation and authorize the City Manager to approve any future budget amendments
Staff Recommendation
It is rec
ommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolut
ion No. 2025-37 (Attachment A) authorizing the City Manager to execute and file the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Transportation Development Act claim to receive the funding allocation; and

2. Authoriz
e the City Manager to approve any future budget amendments.

Background
The Transpor
tation Development Act (TDA) claim consists of three main components:

1. The Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Article 4;

2. State Transit Assistance Fund (STA); and

3. State of Good Repair Fund (SGR).

The Califor
nia State legislature enacted the TDA in 1971, also known as the Mills-Alquist- Deddeh Act (Public Utilities Code Section 99200 et seq. ), to establish the LTF for each county in California. The City must spend allocated LTF exclusively for the operation of the public transportation system under California Senate Bills 716 and 203. The Legislature added the STA in 1979 to provide a second source of TDA funding for transportation planning and established the SGR in 2017 to provide ongoing transportation revenues for eligible transit maintenance, rehabilitation, and capital projects. Together these funds sustain Simi Valley Transit’s annual operations and fleet improvements for transit.

AGENDA I

TEM NO.

Consent (12)

Discussion

Each year , the City must submit a LTF claim to the V entura County Transportation Commission (County Commission) to receive these allocations, including certifying the assurance statement on Attachment B. Attachment C shows the final FY 2025-26 LTF apportionments to unincorporated Ventura County and its ten cities, in which Simi Valley will receive $ 5,822,399. The California State Controller’s Office’s (State Controller) estimates the City’s FY 2025-26 allocation is $81,507 and $14,136 for the STA and SGR, respectively (Attachment D).

Because these figures remain subject to final adjustment , Simi Valley Transit modestly increased the claim to ensure the City can draw the final allocation once final State Controller figures are confirmed. Therefore, the final proposed claim is $83,507 for STA, an increase of $2,000, and $14,636 for SGR, an increase of $500 above the SCO estimates. Resolution No. 2025- 37 would allow the City Manager to file the claim promptly and execute any necessary adjustments so the City can receive and use TDA funds without delay.

Financial Impact

The cost of this action was included in the FY 2025-26 adopted budget to fund transit operating expenses with LTF funds and capital project CP75000006 using the STA and SGRs funds.

City Council Priority

This item advances the City Council’s Pillars of Excellence – Fiscal Stability by maximizing state funding and ensuring timely reimbursement for transit operations and infrastructure.

Suggested Motion

I move to adopt Resolution No. 2025-37, authorizing the City Manager to execute and file the Fiscal Year FY2025-26 TDA claim to receive the funding allocation, and to authorize the City Manager to approve any future budget amendments.

Summary

Simi Valley Transit relies on TDA funds to operate and improve the City’s public transit system. The proposed resolution authorizes the City Manager to file the FY 2025-26 claim and make any needed budget adjustments to accept final allocations from the County Commission and the State Controller. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-37, authorizing the City Manager to execute and file the fiscal year FY2025-26 TDA claim to receive the funding allocation, and to authorize the City Manager to approve any future budget amendments.

2 Prepared by: Tan Koehler, Senior Management Analyst

Attachments

Attachment A – Resolution No. 2025-37
Attachment B – FY 2025-26 TDA Claim and Assurances
Attachment C – FY 2025-26 TDA LTF Apportionment Schedule Attachment D – FY 2025-26 STA/SGR Allocation Estimates
3 Attachment A

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-37

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SIMI VALLEY AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND FILING

OF A CLAIM WITH THE VENTURA COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (VCTC) FOR ALLOCATION

OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

WHEREAS, the Transportation Development Act (TDA) , as amended (Public Utilities Code, § 99200 et seq.), provides for the allocation of funds from the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and the State Transit Assistance (STA) Fund for use by eligible claimants for various transportation and transit purposes as allowed by TDA; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the TDA, as amended, and pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations hereunder (Cal . Code Regs., § 6600 et seq.), a prospective claimant wishing to receive an allocation from the LTF and the STA fund must file its claim with VCTC; and

WHEREAS, the City of Simi Valley (City) is eligible to receive TDA funds allocated from the LTF fund and STA fund; and

WHEREAS, the City is desirous of utilizing these funds for Transit activities within the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1 . The City Manager is authorized to execute and file an appropriate claim and further execute any amendments thereto necessary to ensure the most effective allocation of funds pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations promulgated hereunder, together with all necessary supporting documents, with VCTC for an allocation of TDA funds in Fiscal Year 2025-26.

SECTION 2. The authorized claim pursuant to Section 1 above for Article 4 public transportation purposes (Pub. Util. Code, § 99260) of $5,822,399 must be allocated to the City’s Transit Fund for public transit expenditures , including administrative, operations, and capital costs , but not limited to rolling stock, equipment , facility modifications such as upgrades and improvements.

4 RES. NO. 2025-37

SECTION 3. The authorized claim, pursuant to Section 1 above, includes 100% of available STA funds according to the allocations published by the State Controller’s Office for local transporta tion planning and mass transportation purposes (Pub. Util. Code, § 99301).

SECTION 4. The authorized claim , pursuant to Section 1 above, includes 100% of available State of Good Repair funds according to the amounts published by the State Controller’s Office (Pub. Util. Code, §§ 99313, 99314).

SECTION 5. A copy of this resolution will be transmitted to the VCTC in conjunction with the filing of the claim.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk must certify to the adoption of this resolution and must cause a certified resolution to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk.

PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of November 2025.

Attest:

Lucy Blanco, City Clerk Dee Dee Cavanaugh, Mayor of the City of Simi Valley, California

Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content:

Algeria R. Ford, City Attorney Samantha C. Argabrite, City Manager

Ronald K. Fuchiwaki
Public Works Director

5 Transportation Development Act
Form A - Claim Form
Line
1 Fiscal Year 2025/2026
2 Claimant City of Simi Valley
3 Address 490 W Los Angeles Ave
Simi Valley CA
4 Name of Contact Person Tan Koehler
5 Title of Contact Person Senior Management Analyst
6 Telephone Number of Contact Person 805-583-6483
7 Email Address of Contact Person [email protected] Purpose Claimed
Local Transportation Fund
8 Article 3, Pedestrian and Bicycles (PUC § 99234) -$
9 Article 4, Transit 5,822,399.00$
10 Article 4.5, Community Transit (PUC §99233.7 & § 99275) -$ 11 Article 8(a), Streets & Roads/Pedestrians & Bicycles (PUC § 99400(a)) -$ 12 Article 8(b), Passenger Rail (PUC § 99400(b)) -$
13 Article 8(c), Transit (PUC § 99400(c)) -$
14 Article 8(d), Transit Admin. and Planning (PUC § 99400(d)) -$ 15 Article 8(e), Transit Capital (PUC § 99400(e)) -$
16 Article 8(f), Commuter Vanpool (PUC § 99400(f)) -$
17 Article 8, Other -$
18 Total LTF Claimed 5,822,399.00$
19 Less funds released to
20 for Article
21 for purpose of
22 in the amount of -$
23 Amount of LTF to be sent to Claimant (Line 17 minus Line 21) 5,822,399.00$ Purpose Claimed
State Transit Assistance
24 STA Transportation and Rail 83,507.00$
25 SGR State of Good Repair 14,636.00$
26 Total STA & SGR Claimed 98,143.00$
27 Authorizing Signature
28 Name of Authorizing Agent Samantha Argabrite
29 Title of Authorizing Agent City Manager
30 Date
(Updated 07/07/20)
Claimant acknowledges that payment by the County Auditor-Controller of an allocation made by the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution and to the provision that such monies are used only in accordance with the terms of the allocation instruction issued by the VCTC. Claimant also certifies that the information on the claim forms are true and accurate to the best of their knowledge and that the claimant is eligible for the funds claimed and will use them for eligible expenditures per the TDA regulations. If the STA and SGR funds claimed are based on the estimates provided by the State of California, the funds paid to the local agency will be the actual amount received and may vary from the amounts claimed.

The following individual is hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the named entity, and to take any action necessary for the purpose of obtaining Local Transportation Funds and/or State Transit Assistant funds.

The above named claimant hereby applies for allocations of Transportation Development Act funds for the above fiscal year for the purposes and amounts specified below:

Form A - Claim Form
Attachment B
6 Transportation Development Act
Form C - Assurances
Line
1 Fiscal Year 2025/2026
2 Claimant City of Simi Valley
3 Article 4, STA and SGR
Initial Assurance
4 C1 180-Day Certified Fiscal Audit:

If VCTC does NOT have a TDA audit performed on behalf of the claimant , the claimant certifies that it has submitted a satisfactory, independent fiscal audit, with required certification statement, to VCTC and to the State Controller pursuant to PUC § 99245 & CCR § 6664, for the prior year (project year minus two). Claimant assures that this audit requirement will be completed for the current fiscal year (project year minus one).

Applies to All Claims: Article 3, 4, 4.5, 8(a), 8(c), STA and SGR 5 C2 Timely and Reviewed Fiscal Audits:

Claimant staff will make every effort to provide information to the auditors in a timely manner so that the audits can be completed before the 180 day requirement. Audits will be reviewed by claimant/agency staff and are the responsibility of the agency.

Applies to All Claims: Article 3, 4, 4.5, 8(a), 8(c), STA and SGR 6 C3 State Controller Annual Report
Claimant certifies that it has submitted a State Controller's report in conformance with the uniform system of accounts and reports, to VCTC and to the State Controller, pursuant to PUC § 99243, § 99245, CCR § 6637 and/or § 6665 as applicable, for the prior year (project year minus two). Claimant assures that this report will be completed for the current fiscal year (project year minus one) in a timely manner.

Applies to All Claims: Article 3, 4, 4.5, 8(a), 8(c), STA and SGR 7 C4 Passed-through TDA Funds Retain TDA Requirements:

Claimant certifies that any TDA funds received from another agency will remain classified as TDA even when passed-through from another agency. These funds will be classified as TDA in the financial records and reported accordingly. These funds will retain TDA requirements.

Applies to All Claims: Article 3, 4, 4.5, 8(a), 8(c), STA and SGR 8 C5 Interest Accrual:

Claimant will accurately account for TDA revenues and expenses and accrue interest accordingly. Interest will be spent on allowable expenses.

Applies to All Claims: Article 3, 4, 4.5, 8(a), 8(c), STA and SGR 9 C6 Unmet Transit Needs:

Claimant certifies that all reasonable transit needs are satisfied and is eligible to receive Article 8(a) local streets and roads.

Applies to 8(a) (Streets and Roads)
10 C7 Revenue Ratios:

Claimant is responsible for preparing the revenue ratio calculation(s) and certifies that it intends to maintain for the project year a ratio of fare revenues to operating costs of at least (a) 20 percent if the claimant is serving an urbanized area, (b) 10 percent if the claimant is serving a non-urbanized area, or (c) as determined by VCTC pursuant to CCR § 6633.2(c) and PUC § 99268. If the required ratio is not met, the "non-compliance with required revenue ratios" outlined in the TDA regulations will be implemented.

Applies to 4, 4.5, 8 (transit), STA
Claimant Assurances: (Initial Each Section Below OR N/A if not applicable to the claim) Form C - Assurances
7 Transportation Development Act
Form C - Assurances
Line
1 Fiscal Year 2025/2026
2 Claimant City of Simi Valley
3 Article 4, STA and SGR
Initial Assurance
Claimant Assurances: (Initial Each Section Below OR N/A if not applicable to the claim) 11 C8 Revenue Ratios for Exclusive Services to Seniors and Disabled:

Claimant filing a claim pursuant to PUC 99268.5 certifies that, for the purpose of that claim, it provides services using vehicles for the exclusive use of elderly and handicapped persons.

Applies to 4, 4.5, 8 (transit), STA
12 C9 50-Percent Allocation and Alternative Method Limitation:

The expenditure of the funds received by an operator, city or county may in no year exceed 50 percent of the amount required to meet operating, maintenance, and capital and debt service requirements of the system after deduction therefrom of approved federal grants estimated to be received. Alternatively, the operator may by allocated additional funds that could not be allocated to it because of those requirements, if it maintains, for the fiscal year, a ratio of fare revenues to operating costs as defined by § 99247 (see PUC § 99268.1, § 99268.2 and § 99405 and CCR § 6633.1).

Applies to 4, 4.5, 8 (transit), STA
13 C10 Retirement System or Private Pension Plan:

Claimant filing a claim pursuant to PUC § 99260 certifies that (a) the current cost of its retirement system is fully funded with respect to the officers and employees of its public transportation system (PUC § 99271(a)); or (b) the operator is implementing a plan approved by VCTC which will fully fund the retirement system for such officers and employees within 40 years (PUC § 99271(a)); or (c) the operator has a private pension plan which sets aside and invests, on a current basis, funds sufficient to provide for the payment of future pension benefits and which is fully compliant with the requirements stated in PUC § 99272 and § 99273.

Applies to 4, 4.5, 8 (transit)
14 C11 Use of Federal Funds:

Claimant certifies that it is making full use of federal funds available under the FTA Act in accordance with PUC § 99286.7,CCR § 6754(a)(3) and/or § 6634 as applicable.

Applies to 4, 4.5, 8 (transit), STA
15 C12 Staffing:

Claimant certifies that it is in compliance with PUC § 99264 that it does not routinely staff, with two or more persons, a vehicle for public transportation purposes designed to be operated by one person.

Applies to 4, 4.5, 8 (transit)
16 C13 Reduced Fares:

Claimant certifies that if it offers reduced fares to seniors, the same reduced rate is offered to disabled persons and disabled veterans (PUC § 99155). Claimant further assures that it will honor the federal Medicare identification card or a card issued pursuant to § 22511.55 of the Vehicle Code as sufficient identification to receive reduced fares.

Applies to 4, 4.5, 8 (transit)
17 C14 CHP Certification:

Claimant certifies that, it has on file a California Highway Patrol Certification having been conducted in the last 13 months indicating their compliance with § 1808.1 of the Vehicle Code.

Applies to 4, 4.5, 8 (transit), STA
Form C - Assurances
8 Transportation Development Act
Form C - Assurances
Line
1 Fiscal Year 2025/2026
2 Claimant City of Simi Valley
3 Article 4, STA and SGR
Initial Assurance
Claimant Assurances: (Initial Each Section Below OR N/A if not applicable to the claim) 18 C15 Accessible Vehicles:

Claimant certifies that it is in compliance with PUC § 99155.5 regarding dial-a-ride and paratransit services being accessible to handicapped persons, and that the service be provided to persons without regard to vehicle ownership and place of residence.

Applies to 4, 4.5, 8 (transit)
19 C16 Budget Increase of 15% or more
Claimant certifies that the transit operator's operating budget has not increased more than 15% over the preceding year, and does not include a substantial increase or decrease in the scope of operations or capital budget provisions for major new fixed facilities. If the budget does include such changes, documentation is attached that identifies and substantiates the reason or need for the changes (PUC § 99266, § 99268 and CCR § 6633.1 and § 6632).

Applies to 4, 4.5, 8 (transit)
20 C17 Part-Time Employees
Claimant certifies that in accordance with PUC § 99243 and it is not precluded from employing part-time drivers or contracting with common carriers of persons operating under a franchise or license. Claimant further certifies that no person who was a full-time employee on June 28, 1979, shall have his or her employment terminated or his or her regular hours of employment, excluding overtime, reduced as a result of it employing part-time drivers or contracting with such common carriers.

Applies to STA (transit)
21 C18 Operator's Qualifying Criteria
Claimant certifies that it meets and will maintain the efficiency standards pursuant to PUC § 99314.6 when claiming State Transit Assistance funds for transit operations.

Applies to STA (transit)
The undersigned herby certifies that the above statements are true and correct. 22 Authorizing Signature:
23 Print Name and Title: Samantha Argabrite
24 Date: November 17, 2025
(updated June 2019)
Form C - Assurances
9 Item #
9D
June 6, 2025
MEMO
TO: VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
FROM: T

HAO LE, ACCOUNTING PROGRAM MANAGER

LUPE ACERO, FINANCE DIRECTOR

SUBJECT
: TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA)

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF)
FINAL APPORTIONMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026
RECOMM
ENDATION:
• Approve
the Local Transportation Fund Final Apportionment for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, apportioning $51.8 million as shown in Attachment A.

BACKGROUND:

Each y
ear the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) is responsible for apportioning the quarter cent statewide sales tax funds that accrue to Ventura County under the State Transportation Development Act (TDA) Local Transportation Fund (LTF). Current eligible uses of LTF revenues include funds for VCTC administration (amount determined by the Commission), County administration fees, VCTC planning activities (capped at 2% of revenues), bicycle and pedestrian projects (capped at 2% after administrative and planning costs are deducted), rail passenger service operations/capital improvements with the remainder going to fund transit and if all transit needs are met, to street and road projects in cities with populations under 100,000 if eligible. The City of Thousand Oaks is exempt from the 100,000-population rule and is eligible to spend funds on Article 4 or 8 per Senate Bill (SB) 848 June 2018.

The Count
y Auditor-Controller works with staff to determine the projected LTF sales tax revenue for the upcoming fiscal year. In developing the LTF apportionment, the current year is also evaluated to determine if the LTF revenue projection needs to be adjusted, and if so, either up or down depending on the direction of sales tax receipts. VCTC staff reviews the information to decide whether to revise the current apportionment or whether to incorporate the adjustment into the upcoming fiscal year. The beginning fund balance is estimated at this time based on projections. Then the apportionment is prepared according to LTF regulations and submitted to the Commission for approval. A draft apportionment is submitted to the Commission in February and a final apportionment is submitted in June for the upcoming fiscal year. The apportionment is allocated throughout the fiscal year after the local agency files a claim and sales tax receipts are received.

In recogn
ition of the volatility of sales tax revenue, the VCTC adopted two policies to help smooth out the year-to-year flow of funds to LTF recipients. In 2011, the VCTC adopted a policy to maintain a reserve of approximately 10% of funds apportioned for Articles 4 (public 25 Attachment C
10 transportation) and 8 (other allocations, currently transit and local streets and roads) . Should LTF revenues received be lower than estimated, VCTC would be able to draw from the contingency reserve to keep local jurisdictions whole for the fiscal year and to smooth out sales tax fluctuations. The second policy, adopted by VCTC in 2013, established a funding policy to support Rail Passenger Service/Commuter Rail (Metrolink). The policy requires that each time there is an increase in estimated LTF sales tax receipts, the increase will be allocated one-third to Rail Passenger Service/Commuter Rail and two-thirds to bus transit.

DIS
CUSSION:

Thi
s year while working through the LTF projection process with the County Auditor -Controller, it was found that the revenues for the current fiscal year were exceeding the initial projections. The County is now projecting that the current fiscal year’s LTF revenue will increase by $.9 million to $49.2 million. The County Auditor-Controller also estimates that Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Local Transportation Fund sales tax receipts will be at $49.2 million (see attachment B). In the County Auditor-Controller’s projection, the Auditor-Controller cautioned that “Projections are very uncertain given the current economic climate.”
The be
ginning balance for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 is estimated to be $6.5 million comprised of $.9 million estimated additional receipts and $0.4 million interest for the current fiscal year (2024/2025), an additional $1.36 million in actual receipts from Fiscal Year 2023/2024, and the unused budgeted contingency reserve of $3.87 million in the current fiscal year’s apportionment.

The LT
F revenues projection for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 of $49.2 million, plus the $6.5 million beginning fund balance less the $3.87 million contingency reserve results in a LTF apportionment for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 at $51.8 million, $.5 million lower than the previous apportionment for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. The Fiscal Year 2025/2026 apportionment shown in Attachment A follows LTF guidelines and past practices and includes the following:
• Ar
ticle 3 funds in the amount of $12,164,476 for VCTC activities as follows:
o Metr
olink commuter rail funds in the amount of $9,113,676 which is $299,970 higher than last fiscal year. The increase follows the Commission’s policy which designates that one-third of the change in estimated LTF sales tax receipts is allocated to passenger rail.
o Pl
anning funds (2% formula) in the amount of $ 1,036,600 which is $11,400 lower than last fiscal year. These funds are for planning activities which include Regional Transportation Planning, Regional Transit Planning, and Transportation Programming.
o Ad
ministrative funds in the amount of $2,014,200 which is $514,200 higher than last fiscal year. These activities include ADA and Senior projects, Regional Transit Technology, Grant Administration, Regional Transit Information Center, TDA Administration, Transportation Programming as well as supporting the VCTC’s administrative and management functions.
• Ar
ticle 3 Administrative funds in the amount of $18,700 which is $4,200 higher than last fiscal year. These funds pay for the County Auditor-Controller’s administrative costs. • Ar
ticle 3 Bicycle and Pedestrian funds (2% formula) in the amount of $975,210 which is $21,540 lower than last fiscal year. These funds are for local agency’s bicycle and pedestrian projects.
26 11
• Articles 4 and 8 funds in the amount of $38,671,614 which is $1,355,430 lower than last fiscal year. These funds are for local agencies as allowed by TDA regulations. The funds are apportioned to each local agency based on population estimates for the cities and c
ounty from the Department of Finance that were released in April 2025.

S
taff’s recommendation is to approve the Final Local Transportation Fund Apportionment for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, apportioning a total of $51.8 million as shown in Attachment A. 27 12
Fina l Fina l Chan ge vs. FY Draft
F Y 2025/2026 F Y 2024/2025 F Y 2024/2025 F Y 2025/2026 Estimated Unapportioned Cash Balance 6,500,000 8,100,000 -1, 600,000 6,500,000 Contingency Reserve -3,870,000 -4,000,000 130,000 -3,920,000 Estimated Annual LTF Receipts 49,200,000 48,300,000 900,000 49,200,000 Total Funds Available 51,830,000 52,400,000 -570,000 51,780,000 Auditor's Administration 18,700 14,500 4,200 18,700
VCTC Administration 2,014,200 1,500,000 514,200 1,500,000 VCTC Planning and Programming 1,036,600 1,048,000 -11,400 1,035,600 Subtotal 48,760,500 49,837,500 -1,077,000 49,225,700
Article 3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities 975,210 996,750 -21,540 984,514 Subtotal 47,785,290 48,840,750 -1,055,460 48,241,186
Article 3 Rail Passenger Service Operations/Capital 9,113,676 8,813,706 299,970 9,113,676 Total to be Apportioned 38,671,614 40,027,044 -1,355,430 39,127,510 Article 4 and Article 8 by Agency Population Pop % F Y 2024/2025 Camarillo 68,927 8.31% 3,215,322 3, 353,017 -137,695 3,277,664 Fillmore 17,035 2.05% 794,653 828,902 -34,249 810,274
Moorpark 34,754 4.19% 1,621,212 1,705,999 -84,787 1,667,660 Santa Paula 31,658 3.82% 1,476,790 1,523,370 -46,580 1,489,135 Simi Valley 124,815 15.06% 5,822,399 6,025,898 -203,499 5,890,477 Thousand Oaks 122,468 14.77% 5,712,915 5,958,559 -245,644 5,824,652 Gold Coast Transit District:

Ojai 7,559 0.91% 352,614 365,988 -13,374 357,763
Oxnard 198,733 23.97% 9,270,542 9,597,205 -326,663 9,381,525 Port Hueneme 20,838 2.51% 972,056 1,016,195 -44,139 993,358 San Buenaventura 108,985 13.15% 5,083,957 5,226,195 -142,238 5,108,746 Ventura County - Unincorporated 93,233 11.25% 4,349,154 4,425,716 -76,562 4,326,256 Total 829,005 100.00% 38,671,614 40,027,044 -1,355,430 39,127,510 Attachment A

VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TDA FINAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND APPORTIONMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026 28 13
Attachment B
29 14
30 15
1 of 1
State Controller's Office blank text blank text blank text blank text Allocation Detail of State Transit Assistance Pursuant to Public Utilities Code (PUC) section 99314. blank text blank text blank text blank text Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Revised Estimate blank text blank text blank text blank text More information at http://www.sco.ca.gov/ard_local_apportionments.html blank text blank text blank text blank text For assistance, please contact Lucas Rasmussen at 916-323-1374 or at [email protected]. blank text blank text blank text blank text Regional Entity and Operator(s) Revenue Basis
PUC Section 99314 Funds
from Revenue and Taxation
Code sections 7102(a)(3),
6051.8(a), and 6201.8(a)
PUC Section 99314 Funds
from Revenue and Taxation
Code sections 6051.8(b),
and 6201.8(b)
PUC section 99314
Total Amount
Ventura County Transportation Commission blank text
City of Camarillo $751,079 $29,016.00 $23,424.00 $52,440.00 Gold Coast Transit District $4,272,461 $165,053.00 $133,247.00 $298,300.00 City of Moorpark $299,991 $11,589.00 $9,356.00 $20,945.00 City of Simi Valley $1,167,392 $45,099.00 $36,408.00 $81,507.00 City of Thousand Oaks $423,749 $16,370.00 $13,216.00 $29,586.00 Regional Entity Subtotals $6,914,672 $267,127.00 $215,651.00 $482,778.00 Ventura County Transportation Commission - Corresponding to SCRRA*** NA $490,471.00 $395,955.00 $886,426.00 Regional Entity Totals $6,914,672 $757,598.00 $611,606.00 $1,369,204.00 blank text blank text
State Totals $5,696,443,829.00 $220,064,500.00 $177,657,000.00 $397,721,500.00 * The amounts allocated to the member agencies of Altamont Corridor Express are included with their corresponding transportation planning agency. blank text blank text ** The amounts for Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, and the City of San Francisco are combined. blank text blank text *** The amounts allocated to the member agencies of Southern California Regional Rail Authority are included with their corresponding transportation planning agency. blank text Attachment D
16 1 of 1
State Controller's Office blank text blank text
Allocation Detail of State of Good Repair Program Allocation Amount Based on Public Utilities Code (PUC) section 99314 Pursuant to PUC section 99312.1(c).

Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Revised Estimate blank text blank text More information at http://www.sco.ca.gov/ard_local_apportionments.html blank text blank text For assistance, please contact Lucas Rasmussen at 916-323-1374 or at [email protected]. blank text blank text Regional Entity and Operator(s) Revenue Basis
Amount Based on PUC section
99314 Amount
Ventura County Transportation Commission blank text blank text City of Camarillo $751,079 $9,095.00
Gold Coast Transit District $4,272,461 $51,734.00
City of Moorpark $299,991 $3,632.00
City of Simi Valley $1,167,392 $14,136.00
City of Thousand Oaks $423,749 $5,131.00
Regional Entity Subtotals $6,914,672 $83,728.00
Ventura County Transportation Commission - Corresponding to SCRRA*** NA $153,732.00 Regional Entity Totals $6,914,672 $237,460.00
blank text blank text blank text
State Totals $5,696,443,829 $68,976,500.00
* The amounts allocated to the member agencies of Altamont Corridor Express are included with their corresponding transportation planning agency. ** The amounts for Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, and the City of San Francisco are combined. *** The amounts allocated to the member agencies of Southgern California Regional Rail Authority are included with their corresponding transportation planning agency. 17

← All documents from this meeting