City of Simi Valley
Staff Report
J
une 22, 2026
T
o: City Council
Fr
om: Police Department
Steve Shorts, Chief of Police
S
ubject: Approval of the 2025 Military Equipment Annual Report and Continued Approval of the Military Equipment Funding, Acquisition, and Use Policy S
taff Recommendation
I
t is recommended that the City Council:
1. Appr
ove the Police Department’s 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report as required by Government Code section 7072 (Assembly Bill 481); and
2. A
pprove the continued funding, acquisition, and use of military equipment in accordance with the adopted Military Equipment Use Policy.
B
ackground
O
n September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) into law, requiring law enforcement agencies to obtain approval from their governing body before acquiring or using military equipment. The law also requires the adoption of a Military Equipment Use Policy (Attachment A).
O
n June 13, 2022, the City Council adopted the Police Department’s Military Equipment Use Policy and approved Ordinance No. 1342, which became effective on July 13, 2022.
A
B 481 requires that the City Council review the policy annually to ensure compliance with legal standards. The annual review must include information on equipment use, complaints or concerns, audit results, annual costs, inventory, and any plans to acquire additional equipment. The law also requires a publicly noticed community engagement meeting to occur within 30 days of the report’s release.
T
he purpose of this report is to provide the required annual update and allow the City Council to review and determine whether the Department remains in compliance with AB 481.
T
he required publicly noticed community engagement meeting was conducted by the Police Department on June 15, 2026, following the public release of the Department’s annual military equipment report and in compliance with the requirements of AB 481. One member of the public was in attendance and provided no comments regarding the report.
Agenda Item No.
Consent (4)
Discussion
AB 481 id
entifies 15 categories of military equipment subject to reporting and oversight.
The Police Department currently possesses equipment within several of these categories, including unmanned aerial systems, armored vehicles, breaching tools, speciali zed firearms, and less-lethal munitions (Attachment B).
The 2025 Annu
al Military Equipment Report, provides detailed information required by law, including (Attachment C):
• A summ
ary of how the equipment was used and the purpose of its use; • Any complaints or public concerns received;
• Results of internal audits and any policy violations; • Total annual costs, including acquisition, training, maintenance, and storage; • The quantity of each type of equipment currently possessed; and • Any anticipated acquisitions for the upcoming year.
The Poli
ce Department remains compliant with the requirements of AB 481. The equipment identified in the report continues to be used for legitimate law enforcement purposes, including officer safety, public safety response, and critical incident management.
Financia
l Impact
The costs
associated with the military equipment program are included in the Police Department’s adopted budget. No additional appropriation is required. This action has no impact on the City’s General Fund.
City Co
uncil Priority
This it
em supports the Public Safety Pillar of Excellence.
Suggeste
d Motion
I move that
the City Council approve the Police Department’s 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report as required by Government Code section 7072; and approve the continued funding, acquisition, and use of military equipment in accordance with the adopted Military Equipment Use Policy.
Summary
The Polic
e Department's 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report demonstrates continued compliance with the requirements of Assembly Bill 481. The report outlines the Department's inventory of approved military equipment, summarizes equipment deployments during the reporting period, identifies associated program costs, and documents the results of internal audits and community engagement effort s. No policy violations or substantiated complaints were identified during the reporting period, and the 2 Department is requesting continued authorization to fund, possess, and use the approved equipment inventory in support of officer safety, critical incident response, and public safety operations.
Prepared by: Travis Coffey, Police Sergeant
Attachments
Atta
chment A – Military Equipment Use Policy
Attachment B – Military Equipment Inventory List 2025
Attachment C – AB 481 Annual Report 2025
Attachment D – Ordinance No. 1342
3 Policy
707
Simi Valley Police Department
POLICY MANUAL
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/06/21, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Simi Valley Police Department Military Equipment - 1
Military Equipment
707.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
707.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):
Governing body
– The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.
Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
• Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).
• Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
4 Attachment A
Simi Valley Police Department
POLICY MANUAL
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/06/21, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Simi Valley Police Department Military Equipment - 2
707.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Simi Valley Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. 707.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Simi Valley Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:
1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.
2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department’s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
707.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Department:
[See attachment: MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY]
707.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
5 Simi Valley Police Department
POLICY MANUAL
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/06/21, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Simi Valley Police Department Military Equipment - 3
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above, with the exception of the purchase of consumable items, which have been previously approved.
707.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
This policy recognizes the need for agencies to provide assistance to each other, whether in ongoing combined or regional operations, occasional planned operations, or in exigent circumstances. Where applicable to the provisions of Government Code § 7070 through § 7075, such assisting agencies must comply with their respective military equipment use policies when rendering assistance.
707.6 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory. 707.7 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
6 Simi Valley Police Department
POLICY MANUAL
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/06/21, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Simi Valley Police Department Military Equipment - 4
707.9 EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES
This policy also recognizes that there may be very limited or extreme instances where incidents of extraordinary nature could demand the need for incident commanders to authorize Department personnel to use equipment not specified in this policy. This decision must be influenced by the totality of the circumstances, including due regard for the public's safety, officer safety, respecting civil rights, the seriousness of the situation, and other information available at that time. Should such extreme instances occur that call for members of this Department to use equipment not specified in this policy, the incident commander shall, if practical, notify the Chief of Police via the chain of command prior to deploying such equipment. Should such circumstances occur, the Chief of Police or his/her designee, shall notify the City Council as soon as practical, and indicate any such uses in the required annual report.
7 Simi Valley Police Department
Military Equipment List
2025
1. Unmanned, Remotely Operated Ground Vehicle (Category 1) a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
One (1) iRobot 110 - Portable remote-controlled, battery operated, robot equipped with video cameras. Operational range of approximately 300 yards, battery life 6-8 hours. Cost: $18,845.50.
b. Purpose:
Provides officers the ability to visually inspect hazardous environments. The robot can be utilized during high -risk tactical situations such as barricaded subjects and hostage rescues. The robot may also be used to inspect hazardous materials, possible ex plosive devices , and other hazardous situations.
c. Authorized Use:
Absent exigent circumstances, a search warrant must be obtained prior to entering a private dwelling. All search and seizure laws shall be adhered to. d. Expected Lifespan:
Approximately 10 years.
e. Fiscal Impact:
The ongoing costs for maintenance and batteries will vary. Approximately $0 to $500 annually.
2. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Category 1)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
Five (5) DJI Mavic III, two (2) DJI Avata II, one (1) DJI Matrice 30-T. The UAV’s offer high-resolution imaging, precise GPS/sensor navigation, autonomous flight, and extended operational range for effective surveillance and reconnaissance. Cost: $51,921.65
8 Attachment B
b. Purpose:
Monitor high-risk areas and evolving incidents. Provide aerial support during emergency response and to locate individuals. Offer detailed aerial perspectives for forensic analysis.
c. Authorized Use:
User’s must have an appropriate license from the FAA as well as Department training to operate the UAV.
d. Expected Lifespan:
10 years
e. Fiscal Impact:
The ongoing costs for maintenance and batteries will vary. Approximately $0 to $500 annually.
3. Armored Rescue Vehicle, Lenco BearCat (Category 2)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
One (1) “Lenco BearCat” armored personnel carrier. The “BearCat” is an armored vehicle that seats 10 -12 personnel with open floor plan that allows for rescue of down personnel. It can stop various projectiles, which provides greater safety to citizens and officers beyond the protection level of shield and personal body armor. Cost: $263,439.
b. Purpose:
To be used in critical incidents to enhance officer and community safety, improve scene con tainment and stabilization, assist in resolving critical incidents, or display at a community event.
c. Authorized Use:
The use of armored vehicles shall only be authorized by a Watch Commander or SWAT Commander, based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. Armored vehicles shall be used only by officers trained in their deployment and in a manner consistent with department policy and training. d. Expected Lifespan:
25 years.
e. Fiscal Impact:
Annual maintenance cost estimated between $0 and $1,100 annually.
4. Command and Control Vehicles (Category 5)
9 a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
One (1) Model Farber Mobile Command Center vehicle. The Mobile Command Center is a mobile command post. Desk with radios for dispatch on the interior. Several storage areas for the different equipment used by department members. Water, generator, tables, chairs and television. Cost:
$106,504.
b. Purpose:
Provides incident managers and dispatchers the ability to coordinate and manage police resources during incidents.
c. Authorized Use:
Drivers must possess a valid California Class C driver’s license. Take a familiarization and driver orientation course.
d. Expected Lifespan:
80,000 to 100,000 miles
e. Fiscal Impact:
Annual maintenance cost estimated between $0 and $1,000 annually.
5. Command and Control Vehicles (Category 5)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
Three (3) Ford Explorer patrol vehicles equipped with radios, a mobile data computer, whiteboards and storage cabinets . Mid-size modular command post designed to meet the most demanding operational needs of the mobile field commander. The vehicle range is approximately 300 miles on one tank of gas. Cost: $57,000 per vehicle / $2,500 per modular command center. b. Purpose:
Provides incident managers the ability to coordinate and manage police resources during incidents.
c. Authorized Use:
Drivers must possess a valid California Class C driver’s license. Utilized by sworn personnel of the rank of Sergeant or higher. Does not require additional training.
d. Expected Lifespan:
80,000 to 100,000 miles
e. Fiscal Impact:
Annual maintenance cost estimated between $0 and $1,000 annually. 10 6. Frangible Breaching Shotgun (Category 7)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
One (1) Frangible Breaching Shotgun. The modified 12-gauge Remington 870 shotgun is designed to fire a copper or clay compressed frangible projectile through door locking mechanisms and hinges. After defeating the hardware of a door, the projectile disintegrates, mitigating the risk for potential injury to bystanders. Cost: Approximately $800.
b. Purpose:
Allows SWAT officers to safely and effectively breach doors and gates during high-risk search warrant services and hostage rescues.
c. Authorized Use:
Absent exigent circumstances, a search warrant must be obtained prior to entering a private dwelling. All search and seizure laws shall be adhered to.
SWAT Team personnel are authorized to use the breaching shotgun after receiving the required training and having shown the ability to utilize the tool safely and competently.
d. Expected Lifespan:
25 years
e. Fiscal Impact:
The ongoing cost for ammunition will vary. Approximately $0 to $50 annually.
7. Specialized Firearms and Ammunition (Category 9)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
One Hundred Thirty-Seven (137) AR -15 and M4 Carbine rifles of various makes and models. Various makers of ammunition for 223 caliber rifles. Cost:
Approximately $1,100 to $2,000 per unit.
I. Thirty Four (38) - Colts
II. Twelve (16) - Daniel Defense
III. Twelve (12) – POF
IV. Seventy One (71) – Smith & Wesson
b. Purpose:
To be used as precision weapons to address a threat with more precision and/or at greater distances than a h andgun, if present and feasible within department policy and applicable law.
11 c. Authorized Use:
Officers must successfully complete a CA POST certified 24-hour patrol rifle course as well as regular department firearms training and qualifications as required by law and policy.
d. Expected Lifespan:
Approximately 20 years or longer.
e. Fiscal Impact:
The ongoing costs for ammunition will vary and maintenance is conducted by department staff. Approximately $0 to $50 per rifle annually.
8. Specialized Firearms and Ammunition (Category 9)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
Four (4) FN Herstal Police Special Long Rifles. Bolt Action rifle that fires .308 caliber projectiles. Cost: Approximately $1,500 per unit. b. Purpose:
To be used as precision weapons to address a threat with more precision and/or at greater distances than a handgun, if present and feasible within department policy and applicable law.
c. Authorized Use:
Officers must successfully complete a CA POST certified sniper rifle course as well as regular department firearms training and qualifications as required by law and policy.
d. Expected Lifespan:
Approximately 20 years or longer.
e. Fiscal Impact:
The ongoing costs for ammunition will vary and maintenance is conducted by department staff. Approximately $0 to $50 per rifle annually.
9. Specialized Firearms and Ammunition (Category 9)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
Two (2) Sig Sauer 716G2 7.62, AR -10 Semi-Automatic Long Rifles that fire
7.62 NATO caliber projectiles. Utilizing the tried and true Direct Impingement System, an M1913 Mil -Std rail, free -floating barrel, aluminum forend, and telescoping stock, the SIG716 is the rifle of choice when you require the power of a larger caliber carbine. Cost: Approximately $1,600 per unit. 12 b. Purpose:
To be used as precision weapons to address a threat with more precision and/or at greater distances than a handgun, if present and feasible within department policy and applicable law.
c. Authorized Use:
Officers must successfully complete a CA POST certified sniper rifle course as well as regular department firearms training and qualifications as required by law and policy.
d. Expected Lifespan:
Approximately 20 years or longer.
e. Fiscal Impact:
The ongoing costs for ammunition will vary and maintenance is conducted by department staff. Approximately $0 to $50 per rifle annually.
10. Light Sound Diversionary Device (Category 11)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
Forty-Eight (48) CTS Model 7290m, mini light sound diversionary devices (flashbangs). Produce 6-8 million candela of light and 175db of sound. Cost:
$37.65 per unit.
b. Purpose:
The light sound diversionary device (flashbang) is a diversionary device used during high-risk search warrants, arrests of armed and violent suspects , and hostage rescues. An intense bright light and loud noise are created, temporarily overwhelming the suspect.
c. Authorized Use:
SWAT personnel are authorized to carry light sound diversionary devices. All authorized personnel must attend a user's course taught by a POST certified instructor and complete a qualification.
d. Expected Lifespan:
5 years
e. Fiscal Impact:
The ongoing cost will vary each year. Approximately $0 to $1,000 annually. 13 11. Tear Gas (Category 12)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
Various quantities of chemical agent munitions, which are commonly referred to as “tear gas,” are used by the Simi Valley Police Department as a non-lethal tool to disperse rioting suspe cts and on barricaded suspects per department policy and applicable law. The Simi Valley Police Department uses chemical agents which are used by law enforcement across the United States: CS (2 Chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile) and OC (Oleoresin Capsicum) . CS is an irritating agent and lachrymator (irritates the eyes and causes tears to flow).
CS has been medically tested in the UK and US, specifically by the U.S. Army.
There are no known allergic reactions to CS. OC was de -regulated in California in 1996, is endorsed by the FBI, and is available to civilians to legally possess (2.5 oz. or less). OC is an inflammatory agent which causes involuntary closure of eyes (open in 2-5 minutes) and respiratory inflammation (subsides in approximately 2 minutes).
I. CTS 5230 – Non-baffled pyrotechnic canister that emits 95 grams of CS agent. Cost: $31.14 per munition.
II. CTS 6230 – Non-baffled pyrotechnic canister that emits 77 grams of CS agent. Cost: $31.90 per munition.
III. CTS 5230B – Baffled pyrotechnic canister that emits 25 grams of CS agent. It has a low flame potential that is designed for indoor use.
Cost: $40.42 per munition.
IV. CTS 9230 – Jet-Lite Rubber ball pyrotechnic that delivers 40 grams of CS agent. Cost: $32.46 per munition.
V. CTS 4330 – 40mm Liquid CS round that delivers 10 grams of CS agent from a 40mm launcher. Cost: $25.06 per munition.
VI. CTS 9590 – Rubber Stingball munition . Dispersion of stinging .31 caliber rubber pellets. Cost: $52.50 per munition.
b. Purpose:
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less-lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
• Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. • Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
• Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. • Potentially vicious animals.
• Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
c. Authorized Use:
Only officers who have received POST certification or manufacturer-specific training in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. 14 d. Expected Lifespan:
I. CTS 5230 – 5 years
II. CTS 6230 – 5 years
III. CTS 5230B – 5 years
IV. CTS 9230 – 5 years
V. CTS 4330 – 5 years
VI. CTS 9590 – 5 years
e. Fiscal Impact:
I. CTS 5230 – $0 to $300
II. CTS 6230 – $0 to $300
III. CTS 5230B – $0 to $300
IV. CTS 9230 – $0 to $300
V. CTS 4330 – $0 to $300
VI. CTS 9590 – $0 to $300
12. PepperBall Launcher & Projectiles (Category 12)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
Five (5) Launchers that are part of a s ystem that uses high-pressure air to deliver PAVA (pelargonic acid vanillylamide) powder projectiles (similar to a paintball delivery system). System capable of launching projectiles at a subject up to 60 feet away. System capable of area saturation up to 15 0’. Non-lethal option offers law enforcement officers the ability to deliver chemical agents and kinetic energy impacts to subjects in a pot entially violent encounter. De- escalation tool used to avoid further injuries or lethal options on a subject.
Cost: $219.99 per unit.
I. PepperBall LIVE PROJECTILE, The basic P epperBall projectile contains 2.5 grams of PAVA pepper powder, and is designed for direct impact and area saturation, especially in confined, interior spaces.
Discharged from a PepperBall Launcher, the projectile has a velocity of 280-350 FPS. The projectile has a direct impact of 60 feet and an area of saturation of 150+ feet. The projectil e contains 0.5% PAVA powder. Cost: $1,000.
b. Purpose:
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less-lethal weapon systems may include but are not limited to:
• Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. • Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
• Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. • Potentially vicious animals.
• Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
15 c. Authorized Use:
Only those officers who have been trained in the use of PepperBall launchers are authorized to use the PepperBall launchers.
d. Expected Lifespan:
I. PepperBall Launcher – 15 years
II. Live Projectile – 3 years
e. Fiscal Impact:
I. PepperBall Launcher – Estimated between $0 and $1,000 annually.
II. Live Projectile – Estimated between $0 and $1,000 annually.
13. Gas Shotgun (Category 12)
a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
Two (2) Combined Systems LC5 40mm Launching Cup attached to a Remington 870 Shotgun. The LC5 Launching Cups are designed for the 5200 series gas canisters. The cups can be attached to virtually any 12 -gauge shotgun and the munition launched with a model 2600 launching cartridge.
Allows officers to launch canisters of chemical agents or smoke. Cost: $302. b. Purpose:
Allows SWAT officers to safely and effectively launch CS gas canisters from a distance in situations where lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. c. Authorized Use:
SWAT Team personnel are authorized to use the gas shotgun after receiving the required training and having shown the ability to utilize the tool safely and competently.
d. Expected Lifespan:
25 years
e. Fiscal Impact:
The ongoing cost for ammunition will vary. Approximately $0 to $50 annually.
14. Projectile Launch Platforms and Associated Munitions – 37mm (Category 14) a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
Eleven (11 ) 37mm Less Lethal Launchers made by Penn Arms and Sage.
These launchers are not firearms, but a less-lethal launching system that use smokeless powder to deliver 37MM projectiles from a safe distance. They fire rubber-tipped kinetic energy baton rounds from a distance of 1 to 100 yards.
Cost: $1,795 per launcher and $19.75 per baton round.
16 b. Purpose:
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less -lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
• Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. • Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
• Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. • Potentially vicious animals.
• Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
c. Authorized Use:
Only those officers who have been trained in the use of 37mm launchers are authorized to use them.
d. Expected Lifespan:
I. 37mm Launcher-15 years
II. 37mm Rubber Munition – 5 years
e. Fiscal Impact:
Ongoing cost for maintenance and munitions will vary . Approximately $0 to $1,000 annually.
15. Projectile Launch Platforms and Associated Munitions – 40mm (Category 14) a. Quantity, Description, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
Four (4) 40mm Less Lethal Launchers made by B&T. Designed from the ground up to be lightweight, mission -configurable, and supremely accurate, the GL06 launcher combined with SIR (Safe Impact Round) munitions represents the pinnacle of point-of-aim/point-of-impact less-lethal systems. Its specialized rifled barrel enhances effective range and accuracy, ensuring greater munition accountability during publi c order, law enforcement, and peacekeeping operations. Cost: $1,000 per launcher.
I. Defense Technology (6323) 40mm Direct Impact inert crushable foam round. Cost: $21.38 per round.
b. Purpose:
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less -lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
• Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. • Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
• Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. • Potentially vicious animals.
• Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
17 c. Authorized Use:
Only those officers who have been trained in the use of 40mm launchers are authorized to use them.
d. Expected Lifespan:
I. 40mm launcher-15 years
II. Foam round-5 years
e. Fiscal Impact:
Ongoing cost for maintenance and munitions will vary. Approximately $0 to $1,000 annually.
18 AB 481 Annual Report 2025
Sergeant Travis Coffey
Simi Valley Police Department
April 23, 2026
19 Attachment C
MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE AB 481 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
• Approval of Military Use Policy (Completed 2022, Policy 707) • Publish Policy (Completed 2022)
• Annual Report – As this ordinance was adopted i n July of 2022, this report sha ll cover the period from January 2025 through December 31, 2025.
ANNUAL REPORT DESCRIPTION
Assembly Bill 481 requires the police department to report annually on the inventory, procurement, and use of covered military equipment items. The annual report also includes a description of new military equipment the police department seeks City Council approval for acquisition and funding.
Per AB 481, the annual report must include the following:
(1) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use. (2) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment. (3) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response. (4) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report. (5) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. (6) If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.
CHAPTER 45 – USE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT
SVMC 5-45.01 - Purpose and findings.
(a) The military equipment identified in the Military Equipment Use Policy is necessary because there are no reasonable alternatives that can achieve the same objectives of officer and civilian safety.
(b) The Military Equipment Use Policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
20 (c) The military equipment identified in the Military Equipment Use Policy is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
(d) All prior military equipment use complied with the City's policies that were in effect at the time.
(§ 2, Ord. No. 1342, eff. July 13, 2022)
REPORT
(1) MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE AND PURPOSE
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Category 1)
• The Unmanned Aerial Vehicles were utilized for police activity approximately 882 times. Police activity can include tactical surveillance, search & rescue operations, crime scene documentation, accident & disaster assessment, and traffic monitoring.
Armored Rescue Vehicle (Category 2)
• The Armored Rescue Vehicle was utilized on January 20, 2025 , for an armed barricaded subject.
Command and Control Vehicles (Category 5)
• The Mobile Command Center (MCC) was utilized on April 13, 2025 , for a DUI check point.
• The Mobile Command Center (MCC) was utilized on August 30, 2025, for a DUI check point.
• The Mobile Command Center (MCC) was utilized on November 1, 2025, to serve a risk search warrant.
Light Sound Diversionary Device (Category 11)
• Light Sound Diversionary Devices were utilized on January 20, 2025, for an armed barricaded subject.
21 PepperBall Launcher & Projectiles (Category 12)
• PepperBall Launcher & Projectiles were utilized on June 12, 2025 during a mutual aid request for civil unrest in the Los Angeles area.
Projectile Launch Platforms and Associated Munitions (Category 14) • Projectile Launch Platforms and Associated Munitions were utilized on June 12, 2025 during a mutual aid request for civil unrest in the Los Angeles area. (2) COMPLAINTS OR CONCERNS
There were no complaints or concerns.
(3) INTERNAL AUDITS AND VIO
LATIONS
The Department condu cted an internal audit and determined there were no violations o f the Military Equipment Use Policy.
(4) ANNUAL COST
The estimated annual cost for the maint enance and parts of the Command and Control vehicles and Armored Rescue vehicle was approxim ately $5670 (General Fund).
The estimate d annua l cost fo r .22 3 calibe r an d .30 8 caliber ammun ition was approximately $1503.40 (General Fund).
Accounting for personnel training costs is fluid, as personnel, their ranks, assignments, and status change throughout the year. The estimated annual cost for specialized firearms and drone training was approximately $324,000. This included training for any other equipment designated as military equipment per AB 481 and staff time for maintenance and repair of associated equipment (General Fund). (5) QUANTITY
See attached Military Equipment Inventory list.
(6) INTENTION TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT
The Department intends to acquire one additional drone identified as the DJI Matrice 4TD Standalone Combo aircraft. This item will come with additional flight batteries, an intelligent battery, spotlight, speaker system, and associated components necessary for field deployment. The cost of this item is approximately $14,000 and will be funded through the Simi Valley Police Foundation.
22 ORDINANCE NO. 1342
AN O
RDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SIMI VALLEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER
45 (“MILITARY EQUIPMENT POLICY”) TO TITLE 5 OF THE
CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE GOVERNING
THE USE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT BY THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT
THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES
HEREBY FIND AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WH
EREAS, on September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481, relating to the use of military equipment by law enforcement agencies; and
WH
EREAS, Assembly Bill No. 481 (“AB 481”), codified as Government Code Section 7070, et seq., requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body, by an ordinance adopting a “military equipment” use policy, at a regular meeting held pursuant to open meeting laws, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment. The term “military equipment” is defined in California Government Code Section 7070; and WH
EREAS, AB 481 allows the governing body of a city to approve the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it makes specified determinations; and
WH
EREAS, the Military Equipment Use Policy was published on the Simi Valley Police Depa rtment’s website 30 days before the Military Equipment Use Policy was considered at a public hearing before the City Council; and WH
EREAS, the Military Equipment Use Policy meets the requirements of California Government Code section 7071, subdivision (d)(1).
NOW
, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SE
CTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are hereby declared to be true and correct and represent the findings of the City Council made in exercise of its independent judgement.
SE
CTION 2. Determinations. Based on the findings above, in addition to information provided to the City Council at the public meeting, the City Council approves and adopts the Military Equipment Use Policy, based on the following findings:
a) The military equipment identified in the Military Equipment Use Policy is necessary because there are no reasonable alternatives that can achieve the same objectives of officer and civilian safety. b) The Military Equipment Use Policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F2377BC-1D75-4F99-BC8E-C0D55C505302 23 Attachment D
c) The military equipment identified in the Military Equipment Use Policy is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. d) All prior military equipment use complied with the City’s policies that were in effect at the time.
SECT
ION 3. Compliance with CEQA. Adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15 061(b)(3) (General Rule) of the CEQA Guidelines because it is not a “project” and because it can be seen in certainty that there is no possibility that the passage of this Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment.
SECT
ION 4. Inconsistencies. Any provision of the Simi Valley Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance.
SECT
ION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance of any part thereof is for any reason held to the unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance of any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional.
SECT
ION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days following adoption.
SECT
ION 7. Certification. The City Cler k shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted or published in the manner as required by law.
PASSED a
nd ADOPTED this 13th day of June 2022.
Atte
st:
Lucy Blanco, City Clerk Keith L. Mashburn, Mayor of the City of Simi Valley, California
Appr
oved as to Form: Approved as to Content:
David Caceres, City Attorney Brian Paul Gabler, City Manager David Li vingstone, Chief of Police
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F2377BC-1D75-4F99-BC8E-C0D55C505302 24 ORD. NO. 1342
CERTIFICATION
I, City C
lerk of the City of Simi Valley, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 1342 which was adopted by the City Council of the City of Simi Valley, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of June 2022 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES: Council M
embers Cavanaugh Judge, Mayor Pro Tem Litster
and Mayor Mashburn
NAYS: Council M
ember Luevanos
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Simi Valley, California, dated _______________.
Lucy Blanco, CMC
City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F2377BC-1D75-4F99-BC8E-C0D55C505302 June 21, 2022
25