Agenda packet — Solana Beach City Council, January 12, 2022 (part 2 of 3)

WHEREAS, a formal resolution of support from the City Council is a required component of the State Parks, Shoreline Erosion Protection Grant application submittal package indicating that the City authorizes the submittal of a grant application; and WHEREAS, City Staff has prepared a joint application with the City of Encinitas for the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Shoreline Erosion Protection Grant for construction funding support in the amount of $12,120,915, which will represent 85% of the non-federal share of construction costs for the Coastal Storm Damage Reduction Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to sign and submit a Shoreline Erosion Protection Grant Application to the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways to obtain funding to support the construction of shoreline protection to protect critical public infrastructure along the Solana Beach coastline.

3. That the City Council of the City of Solana Beach hereby directs the City Manager to accept any and all grant funding that is successfully obtained through the grant application authorized to be submitted by this Resolution to the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January 2022 at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.9.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: January 12, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager Department/City Attorney’s Office SUBJECT: City Council Consideration and Potential Adoption of Resolution 2022-008 Authorizing Continued Remote
Teleconference Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City for the Period of January 12, 2022 through February 11, 2022 Pursuant to the Brown Act and Continuing
Emergency
BACKGROUND:

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19, the illness caused by the novel coronavirus, a pandemic, pointing at that time to over 118,000 cases of COVID-19 in over 110 countries and territories around the world and the sustained risk of further global spread. This was preceded by declarations of emergency by both the County of San Diego and State of California on February 14, 2020, and March 4, 2020, respectively, followed by a federal emergency declaration on March 13, 2020, as a result of the threat posed by COVID-19. On March 16, 2020, pursuant to Section 2.28.060(A)(1) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC), the Director of Emergency Services/City Manager proclaimed a state of local emergency in the City of Solana Beach due to COVID-19, which was ratified by the City Council through adoption of Resolution 2020-036.

Since that time, there have been numerous Orders and Guidance by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and the Health Officer of the County of San Diego to curtail the spread of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order No. N-29-20, suspending the Ralph M. Brown Act’s requirements for teleconferencing during the COVID-19 pandemic provided that notice and accessibility requirements are met, the public members are allowed to observe and address the legislative body at the meeting, and that a legislative body of a local agency has a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable accommodation January 12, 2022
Continued Emergency Teleconferencing

Page 2 of 5 ends

for individuals with disabilities, as specified. Pursuant to Executive Order No. N-29-20, the City Council and City Commissions have meet by remote teleconferencing following applicable requirements, preserving and nurturing public access and participation in meetings while preserving public health and safety.

On June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21 to roll back certain provisions of his COVID-19-related Executive Orders and to clarify that other provisions remained necessary to help California respond to, recover from and mitigate the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Paragraph 42 of Executive Order N-08-21 waived and set forth certain requirements related to public meetings of local legislative bodies and specified that it would be valid through September 30, 2021.

On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361), which pertains to the same subject matter as Paragraph 42 of Executive Order N08-21, which took effect immediately pursuant to an urgency clause, and which amended the Brown Act, in Government Code section 54953(e)(1)(B), to allow local legislative bodies to continue meeting by teleconference during a gubernatorial proclaimed state of emergency if the local legislative body determines, by majority vote, that as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

On October 13, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-120 authorizing remote teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City for the period of October 13, 2021 through November 12, 2021 pursuant to the new provisions of the Brown Act.

If the state of emergency remains active, or state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, in order to continue to remote teleconference, Government Code section 54953(e)(3) requires that every thirty (30) days, the City Council make the following findings by majority vote:
(A) The legislative body has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency.
(B) Any of the following circumstances exist:
(i) The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person.
(ii) State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.

On November 10, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-127 authorizing continued teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City for the period of November 10, 2021 through December 10, 2021 pursuant to the new provisions of the Brown Act. On December 8, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-137 authorizing continued teleconference meetings through January 7, 2022. On December 15, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-141 authorizing continued teleconference meetings through January 14, 2022.

January 12, 2022
Continued Emergency Teleconferencing

Page 3 of 5 ends

This item is before the City Council is to consider and adopt Resolution 2022-008 (Attachment 1), reconsidering the circumstances of the state of local emergency and authorizing remote teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City for the period of January 12, 2022 through February 11, 2022 pursuant to the new provisions of the Brown Act and in light of the continuing direct impact on the ability of the members to meet safely in person.

DISCUSSION:

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread rapidly throughout the State and County and is impacting the health and welfare of the City of Solana Beach. Updated as of August 13, 2021, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention still recommends staying at least six (6) feet from other people. The California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety and Health’s COVID-19 Prevention Emergency Temporary Standards were updated on June 17, 2021 and are still in effect.

Those workplace standards place an ongoing requirement on employers to assess workplace hazards and implement controls to prevent transmission of disease, noting that there may be circumstances in which employers determine that physical distancing is necessary in their workplace.

A strain of COVID-19, known as SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant (Delta Variant), which is 70% more likely to be spread, has also been identified in the County of San Diego. This strain was originally identified in the United Kingdom. Since persons contracting this strain in the County have had no history of travel, this highly contagious strain is community based. The Delta Variant is highly transmissible in indoor settings, breakthrough cases are becoming more common and hospitalizations have increased throughout San Diego County. On July 28, 2021, the California Department of Public Health issued guidance for the use of face coverings stating that the Delta Variant is two times as contagious as early COVID-19 variants, leading to increasing infections, the Delta Variant accounts for over 80% of cases sequenced, and cases and hospitalizations of COVID-19 are rising throughout the state. In short, COVID-19 continues to threaten the health and lives of City residents.

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), an even newer strain of COVID-19, known as Omicron, has emerged. On November 24, 2021, this new variant B.1.1.529, was reported to the World Health Organization (WHO). On November 26, 2021, WHO named B.1.1.529 Omicron and classified it as a Variant of Concern (VOC). On November 30, 2021, the United States designated Omicron as a Variant of Concern. On December 1, 2021, the first confirmed U.S. case of Omicron was identified.1
On December 13, 2021, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) issued updated Guidance for the Use of Face Coverings requiring masks to be worn by all individuals in all indoor public settings, irrespective of vaccine status, for the period of December 15, 2021 through January 15, 2022, and recommending surgical masks or higher-level respirators. CDPH issued this new measure to bring an added layer of

1 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/omicron-variant.html January 12, 2022
Continued Emergency Teleconferencing

Page 4 of 5 ends

mitigation as the Omicron variant is detected across California, the United States, and the world and is likely to spread more easily than the original SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Delta variant. CDPH additionally found this new measure would bring additional protection to individuals, families and communities during the holidays when more travel occurs, and time is spent indoors.

CDPH reported that since Thanksgiving, the statewide seven-day average case rate has increased by 47% and hospitalizations have increased by 14%. While the percentage of Californians fully vaccinated and boosted continues to increase, we continue to have areas of the state where vaccine coverage is low, putting individuals and communities at greater risk for COVID-19. Given the current hospital census, which is at or over capacity, even a moderate surge in cases and hospitalizations could materially impact California's health care delivery system within certain regions of the state. Other states and countries with similar vaccination rates that have relaxed masking requirements are seeing surges in COVID-19 cases and increasing stress in their healthcare systems.

The holiday season, with attendant increases in indoor gatherings, travel and exposure to COVID-19, is just starting to come to an end and increased cases as a result of the holiday season are likely be time delayed. The Omicron and Delta variants have caused, and will continue to cause, conditions of imminent peril to the health safety of persons within the City that are likely beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment and facilities of the City. On December 9, 2021, the CDC reported that we do not yet know how easily Omicron spreads, the severity of illness it causes, or how well available vaccines and medications work against it. More recently, COVID-19 case numbers and hospitalizations in San Diego County have gone up significantly during the last two weeks of 2021 with an increase in weekly cases of 135% between December 18 th and December 25th alone. In other words, the local emergency continues and as a result, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

All meetings of the City’s legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Brown Act (California Government Code §§54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend, participate and watch the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business. The recently amended Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e)(1)(B), allows local legislative bodies to continue meeting by teleconference during a gubernatorial proclaimed state of emergency if the local legislative body determines, by majority vote, that as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees and every thirty (30) days thereafter finds by a majority vote under Government Code section 54953(e)(3) that after reconsidering the circumstances of the state of emergency, it continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person.

Resolution 2022-008 (Attachment 1) would make the necessary findings under Government Code section 54953(e)(3) and authorize the City’s legislative bodies to meet by remote teleconferencing within the requirements of applicable law. To continue to meet by remote teleconference, Council will be required to revisit the Resolution within thirty (30) days and find that the state of emergency continues to directly impact January 12, 2022
Continued Emergency Teleconferencing

Page 5 of 5 ends

the ability of the members to meet safely in person pursuant to Government Code section 54953(e)(3).

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The proposed City Council action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections: 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment); 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378); and 15061(b)(3), because the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Because there is no possibility that the Resolution may have a significant adverse effect on the environment, the action is exempt from CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There are no direct fiscal impacts related to the adoption of the Resolution.

WORKPLAN:

N/A
OPTIONS:
• Approve Staff recommendation.
• Approve Staff recommendation with modifications consistent with the Brown Act. • Do not approve Staff recommendations and resume in person meetings. • Provide direction / feedback.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 2022-008 authorizing remote teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City for the period of January 12, 2022 through February 11, 2022 pursuant to the new provisions of the Brown Act.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager/Director of Emergency Services

1. Resolution No. 2022-008
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2022-008

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING

CONTINUED REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS

OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF SOLANA
BEACH FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 12, 2022
THROUGH FEBRUARY 11, 2022 PURSUANT TO THE

BROWN ACT AND CONTINUING EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, the City of Solana Beach (“City”) is committed to preserving and nurturing public access and participation in meetings of the City Council and the City’s commissions; and
WHEREAS, all meetings of the City’s legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code §§54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend, participate and watch the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business; and
WHEREAS, the Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e), makes provisions for remote teleconferencing participation in meetings by members of a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and WHEREAS, the recently amended Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e)(1)(B), allows local legislative bodies to continue meeting by teleconference during a gubernatorial proclaimed state of emergency if the local legislative body determines, by majority vote, that as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; if the state of emergency remains active; and if every thirty (30) days, the local legislative body finds by a majority vote under Government Code section 54953(e)(3) that after reconsidering the circumstances of the state of emergency, it continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency due to the Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, which remains in effect; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, the City Manager, acting as the Director of Emergency Services, did proclaim the existence of a local state of emergency within the City, pursuant to Section 2.28.060(A)(1) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code and Section 8625 of the California Emergency Services Act (California Government Code §§8550 et. seq.), as a result of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, which was ratified by the City Council on March 19, 2020 through the adoption of Resolution 2020-036; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 2020-036, the local emergency was deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council of the City of Resolution 2022-008
Continued Emergency Teleconferencing

Page 2 of 5 ends

Solana Beach and the local emergency does continue to exist; and WHEREAS, COVID-19 continues to threaten the health and lives of City residents; and
WHEREAS, the SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant (Delta Variant) is highly transmissible in indoor settings, breakthrough cases are becoming more common and hospitalizations have increased throughout San Diego County; and
WHEREAS, on July 28, 2021, the California Department of Public Health issued guidance for the use of face coverings stating that the Delta Variant is two times as contagious as early COVID-19 variants, leading to increasing infections, the Delta Variant accounts for over 80% of cases sequenced, and cases and hospitalizations of COVID-19 are rising throughout the state; and
WHEREAS, updated as of August 13, 2021, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommends staying at least six (6) feet from other people; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety and Health’s COVID-19 Prevention Emergency Temporary Standards were updated on June 17, 2021, are still in effect and place an ongoing requirement on employers to assess workplace hazards and implement controls to prevent transmission of disease, which may include circumstances in which employers determine that physical distancing is necessary in their workplace; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2021, the City Council held a regular meeting for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees, made such a determination and adopted Resolution 2021-120 authorizing remote teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City for the period of October 13, 2021 through November 12, 2021 pursuant to the new provisions of the Brown Act; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2021, the City Council reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and adopted Resolution 2021-127 authorizing continued teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City for the period of November 10, 2021 through December 10, 2021 pursuant to the new provisions of the Brown Act; and
WHEREAS, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a new strain of COVID-19, known as Omicron, has emerged; and WHEREAS, on November 24, 2021, this new variant B.1.1.529, was reported to the World Health Organization (WHO); and
WHEREAS, on November 26, 2021, WHO named B.1.1.529 Omicron and classified it as a Variant of Concern (VOC); and
Resolution 2022-008
Continued Emergency Teleconferencing

Page 3 of 5 ends

WHEREAS, on November 30, 2021, the United States designated Omicron as a Variant of Concern; and
WHEREAS, on December 1, 2021, the first confirmed U.S. case of Omicron was identified; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-137 authorizing continued teleconference meetings through January 7, 2022; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 2021, the CDC reported that we do not yet know how easily Omicron spreads, the severity of illness it causes, or how well available vaccines and medications work against it; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2021, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) issued updated Guidance for the Use of Face Coverings requiring masks to be worn by all individuals in all indoor public settings, irrespective of vaccine status, for the period of December 15, 2021 through January 15, 2022, and recommending surgical masks or higher-level respirators. CDPH issued this new measure to bring an added layer of mitigation as the Omicron variant, is detected across California, the United States, and the world and is likely to spread more easily than the original SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Delta variant. CDPH additionally found this new measure would bring additional protection to individuals, families and communities during the holidays when more travel occurs, and time is spent indoors; and
WHEREAS, CDPH reported that since Thanksgiving, the statewide seven-day average case rate has increased by 47% and hospitalizations have increased by 14%.

While the percentage of Californians fully vaccinated and boosted continues to increase, we continue to have areas of the state where vaccine coverage is low, putting individuals and communities at greater risk for COVID-19. Given the current hospital census, which is at or over capacity, even a moderate surge in cases and hospitalizations could materially impact California's health care delivery system within certain regions of the state. Other states and countries with similar vaccination rates that have relaxed masking requirements are seeing surges in COVID-19 cases and increasing stress in their healthcare systems; and
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021- 141 authorizing continued teleconference meetings through January 14, 2022; and WHEREAS, the holiday season, with attendant increases in indoor gatherings, travel and exposure to COVID-19, is just starting to come to an end and increased cases as a result of the holiday season are likely be time delayed; and WHEREAS, between December 15, 2021, and December 25, 2021, 12,078 COVID-19 cases were recorded by the San Diego County Department of Health and Human Services, marking a 135.5% increase in the weekly total from the prior week; and Resolution 2022-008
Continued Emergency Teleconferencing

Page 4 of 5 ends

WHEREAS, the Omicron and Delta variants have caused, and will continue to cause, conditions of imminent peril to the health safety of persons within the City that are likely beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment and facilities of the City; and WHEREAS, the state of emergency remains active.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does find and resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true and correct and incorporated herein as findings.

2. That the City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency.

3. That the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members of the City’s legislative bodies and the public to meet safely in person.

4. That the meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of Solana Beach, including the City Council, standing committees and citizen commissions, shall continue to meet by remote teleconferencing in compliance with applicable law.

5. That the City Manager and Staff are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, conducting open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

6. That this Resolution shall take effect on January 12, 2022, and shall be effective until the earlier of (a) February 11, 2022 or (b) such time as the City Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the legislative bodies of the City may continue to teleconference without compliance with Government Code section 54953(b)(3).

Resolution 2022-008
Continued Emergency Teleconferencing

Page 5 of 5 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 2022, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers -
NOES: Councilmembers -
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers -
ABSENT: Councilmembers -
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_______________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # B.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: January 12, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing: Request for DRP and SDP to Demolish a Single-Family Residence, Construct a
Replacement Two-Story, Single-Family Residence with an
Attached Two-Car Garage, and Perform Associated Site
Improvements at 211 Ocean St. (DRP21-004/SDP21-004;
Applicants: Ford and Cassie Blakely; APN: 263-042-05;
Resolution 2021-128)
BACKGROUND:

The Applicants, Ford and Cassie Blakely, are requesting City Council approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SDP) to demolish a single-family residence, construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 211 Ocean Street. The 8,360 square-foot lot is located within the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and the Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ).

The project was originally heard at the November 10, 2021 City Council meeting.

Concerns were raised by members of the City Council and the public regarding the project’s conformance with the development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) Section 17.68.040.F, specifically with respect to adverse impacts on the privacy of a neighboring property due to a proposed second story deck. After receiving public testimony and evidence concerning the project, the Council voted, by consensus, to continue the application, date-certain, to the January 12, 2022 Council meeting to allow the Applicants the opportunity to address the noted concerns.

The issue before the Council is whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Applicants’ revised request as contained in Resolution 2021-128 (Attachment 1).

January 12, 2022
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely Residence

Page 2 of 4 ends

DISCUSSION:

At the November 10, 2021 Council meeting, the Applicants’ representatives indicated that they were willing to address concerns raised during the Public Hearing; therefore, the hearing was continued, to January 12, 2022. The Applicants submitted revised plans to the Community Development Department on December 17, 2021, which are provided in Attachment 2. The November 10, 2021 Staff Report is included in Attachment 3 for reference.

The Applicants propose to pull back the east side of the second story deck by approximately 6.8 feet to be in line with the east exterior wall of Bedroom #2. The Applicants also propose to modify the second-story floor plan by expanding the deck to the west where an interior lounge and second deck was previously proposed. The exhibit below includes the previous design on the left and the revised design on the right.

Conditions from the Planning, Engineering, and Fire Departments have been incorporated into the updated Resolution of Approval (Attachment 1). !:!fil
Nov 2021 Design
BEDROOM II ----....-...---
LOUNGE
....,.,..,,....

Jan 2022 Design
January 12, 2022
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely Residence

Page 3 of 4 ends

In conclusion, the proposed project, as conditioned, could be found to be consistent with the Zoning regulations and the General Plan. Should the Council determine that the findings can be made to approve the project, the SDP will be approved concurrently with the DRP.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Examples of this exemption include one single-family residence or second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three-single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
∙ Approve Staff recommendation adopting the attached Resolution 2021-128. ∙ Approve Staff recommendation subject to additional specific conditions necessary for the City Council to make all required findings for the approval of a SDP and DRP. ∙ Deny the project if all required findings for the DRP cannot be made.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

The proposed project meets the minimum zoning requirements under the SBMC, may be found to be consistent with the General Plan and may be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings required as discussed in this report to approve a DRP and SDP.

Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the continued Public Hearing: Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2021-128 conditionally approving a DRP and SDP to demolish a singlefamily residence, construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 211 Ocean Street, Solana Beach.

January 12, 2022
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely Residence

Page 4 of 4 ends

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Updated Resolution 2021-128

2. Revised Project Plans Dated January 4, 2022

3. November 10, 2021 Staff Report
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2021-128

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLANA

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT AND STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

PERMIT TO DEMOLISH A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE, CONSTRUCT

A REPLACEMENT TWO-STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH

AN ATTACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE, AND PERFORM ASSOCIATED
SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT 211 OCEAN STREET, SOLANA BEACH
APPLICANTS: FORD AND CASSIE BLAKELY
APPLICATION: DRP21-004/SDP21-004
WHEREAS, Ford and Cassie Blakely (hereinafter referred to as “Applicants”), have submitted an application for a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SDP) pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and
WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on November 10, 2021, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach continued the project to a date certain, January 12, 2022, so that the Applicants could revise the project to address comments made at the November 10, 2021 Council meeting.

WHEREAS, at the public hearing on January 12, 2021, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application as revised; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found the application request exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

I. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

II. That the request for a DRP and SDP to demolish a single-family residence, construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached twocar garage, and perform associated site improvements at 211 Ocean Street, Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 2 of 15 ends

Solana Beach, is conditionally approved based upon the following Findings and subject to the following Conditions:

III. FINDINGS
A. The proposed structure exceeds 16 feet in height above the existing grade, therefore, the project must comply with all of the View Assessment requirements of SBMC Chapter 17.63 and the Applicant was required to complete the SDP process. The Story Pole Height Certification was certified by a licensed land surveyor on June 18, 2021 showing a maximum building height of 25.00 feet (100.75 MSL) above the existing grade. Notices were mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site establishing a deadline to file for View Assessment by August 12, 2021. The City received one application for View Assessment from the property owner (Asli Carome c/o Julie Hamilton, Law Office of Julie Hamilton; “Claimant”) of 201 Ocean Street, which is located immediately east of the subject property.

The project was presented to the View Assessment Commission (VAC) on October 19, 2021, and the VAC made a unanimous recommendation of approval with conditions. The recommended conditions included reduction in height of the proposed chimney by 9 feet (14 feet above grade) and reduction of the vertical height up from the sill of the east-facing window above the main bedroom bathtub to 2 feet, 4 inches.

The Applicants reflected the recommended conditions of approval in the project plans presented to the City Council on November 10, 2021. An additional change provided by the Applicants since the VAC hearing was a 12-15 foot tall hedge (Pittosporum “Silver Sheen”) located along the eastern side of the proposed second-floor covered deck in an effort to address privacy concerns raised by the Claimant. The story pole string lines between poles 16 and 17 were lowered after the VAC hearing to reflect the reduction in chimney height. The change was within the envelope of the originally noticed story poles, therefore, a second noticing period was not required.

Following the VAC hearing, the Claimant’s representative indicated disagreement with the VAC’s recommendation and requested that the City Council consider the View Claim.

As a condition of approval, a height certification prepared by a licensed land surveyor will be required prior to the framing inspection certifying that the maximum height of the proposed addition will not exceed 25.00 feet above the proposed grade or 100.75 feet above MSL, which is the maximum proposed structure height reflected on the project plans.

In accordance with Chapter 17.63 (Structure Development Permit) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 3 of 15 ends

I. The Applicant for the Structure Development Permit has made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the person(s) requesting view assessment. Written evidence of a good faith voluntary offer to meet and discuss view issues, or of a good faith voluntary offer to submit the matter to mediation, is hereby deemed to be a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues.

Written accounts and oral testimony at the public meeting showed that there had been communication between the Applicants and the Claimant.

II. The proposed structure does not significantly impair a view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bike ways, walkways, equestrian trails) which has been identified in the city’s general plan, local coastal program, or city designated viewing areas.

The subject property is not located within designated public viewing areas; therefore, the proposed structure does not significantly impair views from public property.

III. The structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

The Claimant’s primary view is toward the northeast. The proposed structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

IV. There is no significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application. Cumulative view impairment shall be determined by: (a) Considering the amount of view impairment caused by the proposed structure; and (b) considering the amount of view impairment that would be caused by the construction on other parcels of structures similar to the proposed structure.

The VAC members found that there would not be significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application if adjacent lots were allowed to construct a development of a similar size and height.

V. The proposed structure is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

The proposed development is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character, including design, bulk, scale, height, and size.

B. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permit) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 4 of 15 ends

I. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of SBMC Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance), including special regulations, overlay zones and specific plans.

General Plan Consistency: The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City’s General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential, which allows for a maximum of five to seven dwelling units per acre. The development is also consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

Zoning Ordinance Consistency: The project is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) (SBMC 17.20.030 and

17.48.040), which delineates maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR), Permitted Uses and Structures (SBMC Section 17.20.020) which provides for uses of the property for a single-family residence. Further, the project adheres to all property development regulations established for the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and cited by SBMC Section 17.020.030.

The project is consistent with the provisions for minimum yard dimensions (i.e., setbacks) and the maximum allowable Floor area (FAR), maximum building height, and parking requirements.

II. The proposed development complies with the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section

17.68.040.F:
a. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses: The development shall be designed in a manner compatible with and where feasible, complimentary to existing and potential development in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Site planning on the perimeter of the development shall give consideration to the protection of surrounding areas from potential adverse effects, as well as protection of the property from adverse surrounding influences.

The property is located within the MR Zone. The surrounding neighborhood is also located in the MR Zone and consists of a mix of properties that are one- and two-story, single-family residences. The project site is currently developed with a singlestory, single-family residence with an attached garage.

The project, as designed, is consistent with the permitted uses for the MR Zone as described in SBMC Sections 17.20.010 and

17.12.020, which permits one single-family residence and one Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) per lot. The property is
designated Medium Density Residential in the General Plan and Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 5 of 15 ends

intended for single- and multi-family residential development with a maximum density of five to seven dwelling units per acre.

The proposed development is found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the SROZ and within the Coastal Zone. The project has been evaluated, and found to be in conformance with, the regulations of the SROZ. As a condition of project approval, the Applicants shall obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of Building or Grading Permits.
b. Building and Structure Placement: Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhances their intended use.

The Applicants are proposing to construct a replacement twostory, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage.

The location of the existing driveway will be maintained along the western side of the property with access from Ocean Street to the proposed 485 square-foot two-car garage. A screened trash enclosure will be located on the west side of the driveway.

A gated walkway will provide pedestrian access from Ocean Street through the center of the property to the main entrance.

The southern portion of the front yard will include an uncovered patio and a vegetated biofiltration area to support onside drainage. Private walkways will be provided along both the western and eastern sides of the residence to access the rear yard.

The replacement residence will be located in the western portion of the buildable area with portions of the second floor stepped back from the eastern side of the property by varying
dimensions. The 1,713 square-foot first floor living area will include an open-concept kitchen, living, and dining room, an office (bedroom) with a private bathroom, a pantry, a powder room, and a utility room with access to the garage. The first floor will open to both an uncovered courtyard, a covered patio, and the rear yard. The 1,613 square-foot second floor living area will include a main bedroom suite with a partially covered deck located on the north (front) side of the residence and two bedrooms with private bathrooms and decks on the south (rear) side of the residence. The deck located off of Bedroom #2 on the Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 6 of 15 ends

southeastern side of the residence will be covered and also have access from the internal hallway. The deck located off of Bedroom #1 on the southwestern side of the residence will be uncovered. All designed exterior areas, including the courtyard, patio, and decks are exempt from floor area.

Exterior improvements proposed on the south (rear) side of the residence include a barbeque counter and bar seating, a pool and spa, and landscape and hardscape areas. The Applicants are also proposing a detached single-story ADU of 450 square feet located in the southwest corner of the property and partially within the rear yard setback. It should be noted that the detached ADU is not subject to discretionary review, pursuant to SBMC Section 17.20.040(D), and has been shown voluntarily on the project plans. The surrounding yard improvements, however, will be accessible by the tenants of both the ADU and primary residence and, therefore, are subject to the discretionary review.

The total proposed floor area is 3,411 square feet, which is 2 square feet below the maximum allowable floor area for the 8,360 square-foot lot. The maximum floor area calculation for this project is as follows:

0.500 for first 6,000 ft2 3,000 ft2

0.175 for 6,001 to 15,000 ft2 413 ft2
Total Allowable Floor Area: 3,411 ft2
The proposed project, as designed, would meet the minimum required setbacks, provide the required off-street parking, and would be below the maximum allowable floor area for the property.
c. Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area. Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.

Page 7 of 15 ends

landscape architect for substantial conformance with the conceptual plan and compliance with SBMC Chapter 17.56. In addition, the City’s third-party landscape architect will perform an inspection during the construction phase of the project. A separate condition has been added to require that native or drought-tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and waterconserving irrigation systems are required to be incorporated into the landscaping to the extent feasible.
d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas: Any development involving more than one building or structure shall provide common access roads and pedestrian walkways.

Parking and outside storage areas, where permitted, shall be screened from view, to the extent feasible, by existing topography, by the placement of buildings and structures, or by landscaping and plantings.

SBMC Section 17.52.040 and the Off-Street Parking Design Manual (OSPDM) require two (2) parking spaces for a singlefamily residence. ADU’s are not required to provide an additional parking space if the site is located within one-half mile of a transit stop. The subject site is within one-half mile of multiple bus stops on Highway 101; therefore, an additional parking space is not required. The Applicants are proposing to construct a 485 square-foot attached garage in the northwest corner of the proposed residence. The garage will be accessed by a driveway on the northwest corner of the property from Ocean Street.

SBMC Section 17.08.030 indicates that required parking up to 200 square feet per parking space provided in a garage is exempt from the floor area calculation. The proposed garage will provide two 9-foot by 19-foot parking spaces that are clear of obstruction. Therefore, 400 square feet of garage area is exempt from the project’s total floor area calculation.
e. Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving operations in connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.

Page 8 of 15 ends

building pad and consistent grade throughout the yard areas and construct drainage improvements including a bio retention basin located in the northeast portion of the front yard.
f. Lighting: Light fixtures for walkways, parking areas, driveways, and other facilities shall be provided in sufficient number and at proper locations to assure safe and convenient nighttime use.

All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding areas per SBMC 17.60.060 (Exterior Lighting Regulations).

A condition of project approval includes that all new exterior lighting fixtures comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.
g. Usable Open Space: Recreational facilities proposed within required usable open space shall be located and designed to maintain essential open space values.

The project consists of a replacement single-family residence on a developed residential lot; therefore, usable open space and recreational facilities are neither proposed nor required according to SBMC Section 17.20.040.

III. All required permits and approvals including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

All required permits, including a Structure Development Permit, are being processed concurrently with the Development Review Permit.

IV. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicant obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

The Applicants are required to obtain approval from the California Coastal Commission prior to issuance of Building and Grading Permits.

IV. CONDITIONS
Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicants shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 9 of 15 ends

A. Community Development Department Conditions:

I. The Applicants shall pay required Fire Mitigation, Park Development, Public Use Facilities, and Public Facilities Impact Fees set by the 2021 adopted Fee Schedule.

II. Building Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the architectural plans presented to the City Council on January 12, 2021, and located in the project file with a submittal date of January 4, 2022.

III. Prior to requesting a framing inspection, the Applicants shall submit a height certificate prepared by a licensed land surveyor prior to the framing inspection certifying that the tallest point of the proposed residence will not exceed 25.00 feet above the proposed grade or 100.75 feet above the Mean Sea Level (MSL) in conformance with the plans as approved by the City Council on November 10, 2021.

IV. Any proposed onsite fences, walls and retaining walls and any proposed railing located on top, or any combination thereof, shall comply with applicable regulations of SBMC Section 17.20.040 and

17.60.070 (Fences and Walls).

V. The Applicants shall obtain required California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval of a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption as determined necessary by the CCC, prior to the issuance of Building and Grading Permits.

VI. The Applicants shall provide a full Landscape Documentation Package in compliance with SBMC Chapter 17.56 and in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan included in the project plans presented to the City Council on January 12, 2022 prior to Building Permit issuance, which will be reviewed and inspected by the City’s third party landscape professional.

VII. Native or drought tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water conserving irrigation systems shall be incorporated into any proposed landscaping and compatible with the surrounding area to the extent feasible.

VIII. All new exterior lighting fixtures shall be in conformance with the Citywide lighting regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060).

All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.

IX. Construction vehicles shall be parked on the subject property at all Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 10 of 15 ends

times feasible. If construction activity prohibits parking on the subject property, the Applicants shall ensure construction vehicles are parked in such a way to allow sufficient vehicular access on the street and minimize impact to the surrounding neighbors.

X. The Applicants shall connect to temporary electrical service as soon as feasible to the satisfaction of the City. The use of gas-powered generator(s) during construction activity is discouraged and shall be limited only to selective use at the discretion of the City.

XI. The east-facing windows located in the bathroom of the main bedroom shall have a minimum sill height of 4.5 feet.

B. Fire Department Conditions:

I. ACCESS ROAD MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed improved width of not less than 20 feet; curb line to curb line, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Exception: Single-Family residential driveways; serving no more than two single-family dwellings, shall have minimum of 16 feet, curb line to curb line, of unobstructed improved width. Access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of not less than 75,000 pounds and shall be provided with an approved paved surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities.

II. OBSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION: All
roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width during construction and maintained free and clear, including the parking of vehicles, in accordance with the California Fire Code and the Solana Beach Fire Department.

III. ADDRESS NUMBERS: STREET NUMBERS: Approved numbers
and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate additional locations as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from either direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background, and shall meet the following minimum standards as to size: 4” high with a ½” inch stroke width for residential buildings, 8” high with a ½” stroke for commercial and multi-family residential buildings, 12” high with a 1” stroke for industrial buildings. Additional numbers shall be required where deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear access doors, building corners, and entrances to commercial centers.

Page 11 of 15 ends

Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Sprinklers shall be installed in the new residence and ADU.

V. CLASS “A” ROOF: All structures shall be provided with a Class “A” Roof covering to the satisfaction of the Solana Beach Fire Department.

C. Engineering Department Conditions:

I. The Applicants are required to obtain an Encroachment Permit in accordance with SBMC Section 11.20 for the frontage improvements being done in the public right-of-way. The frontage improvements shall be done to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the proposed project:
a. Construction of any damaged sidewalk panels or curb/gutter as directed by the City Inspector.
b. Construction of the sidewalk underdrain.
c. Widening of the existing four feet wide sidewalk to six feet wide sidewalk with appropriate transitional sections to match the proposed driveway to the west and the existing sidewalk to the east as well as construction of landscaping between the back of the proposed sidewalk and the new retaining, wall which will be constructed on the property line.
d. Construction of the SDRSD driveway approach with 2:1 transitions to the existing concrete sidewalk.
e. Construction of the concrete walkway from the proposed sidewalk to the front pedestrian gate.
f. Removal of the existing retaining walls.

II. The Applicants shall record the Encroachment Maintenance Removal Agreement (EMRA) with the County of San Diego prior to the release of the Grading Bond and Security Deposit. The EMRA shall be recorded against this property for all private improvements in the public right-of-way including, but not limited to:
a. Walkway steps.
b. Sidewalk underdrain pipe.

III. The Applicants shall pay in full the one-time Sewer Capacity Fee of $4,500.00 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) prior to Building Permit issuance. The EDU assignment is determined by SBMC 14.08.060.

The proposed residential unit would increase the property’s EDU Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 12 of 15 ends

assignment by 0.8 EDU. The cost the Applicants are responsible for is $3,600.00 prior to Building Permit Issuance (0.8 EDU multiplied by $4,500.00).

IV. All construction demolition materials shall be recycled according to the City’s Construction and Demolition recycling program and an approved Waste Management Plan shall be submitted.

V. Construction fencing shall be located on the subject property unless the Applicants have obtained an Encroachment Permit in accordance with chapter 11.20 of the SBMC which allows otherwise.

Grading:

VI. The Applicants shall obtain a Grading Permit in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code. Conditions prior to the issuance of a grading permit shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. The Applicants shall obtain a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer.

On-site grading design and construction shall be in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code.
b. The Applicants shall obtain a Soils Report prepared by a Registered Soils Engineer and approved by the City Engineer.

All necessary measures shall be taken and implemented to assure slope stability, erosion control and soil integrity. The grading plan shall incorporate all recommendations contained in the soils report.
c. The Applicants shall provide a Drainage Report prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. This report shall address the design for detention basin and corresponding outflow system to ensure the rate of runoff for the proposed development is at or below that of pre-existing condition. All recommendations of this report shall be incorporated into the Preliminary Grading Plan. A detention basin easement(s) shall be recorded for maintenance of the detention basins by the property owner(s) in perpetuity, prior to Final Inspection of the Building Permit.
d. The Applicants shall show all retaining walls and drainage structures. Retaining walls shown on the grading plan shall conform to the San Diego Regional Standards or be designed by a licensed civil engineer. Engineering calculations for all designed walls with a surcharge and nonstandard walls shall be submitted at grading plan check. Retaining walls may not exceed the allowable height within the property line setback as Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 13 of 15 ends

determined by the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code.

Contact the Community Development department for further information.
e. The Applicants are responsible to protect the adjacent properties during construction. If any grading, construction activity, access or potential construction-related impacts are anticipated beyond the property lines, as determined by the City Engineer, the Applicants shall obtain a letter of permission from the adjoining property owners. All required letters of permission shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the Grading Permit.
f. The Applicants shall pay a grading plan check fee in accordance with the current Engineering Fee Schedule at initial grading plan submittal. Inspection fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the Grading Permit.
g. The Applicants shall obtain and submit grading security in a form prescribed by the City Engineer.
h. The Applicants shall obtain haul permit for import / export of soil.

The Applicants shall transport all excavated material to a legal disposal site.
i. The Applicants shall submit certification from the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer that all public or private drainage facilities and finished grades are functioning and are installed in accordance with the approved plans. This shall be
accomplished by the Engineer of Record incorporating as-built conditions on the Mylar grading plans and obtaining signatures of the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer certifying the as-built conditions.
j. An Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan shall be prepared by the Applicants. Best management practices shall be developed and implemented to manage storm water and
non-storm water discharges from the site at all times during excavation and grading activities. Erosion prevention shall be emphasized as the most important measure for keeping
sediment on site during excavation and grading activities.

Sediment controls shall be used as a supplement to erosion prevention for keeping sediment on site.
k. The Applicants shall show all proposed on-site private drainage facilities intended to discharge water run-off. Elements of this design shall include a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis verifying the adequacy of the facilities and identify any easements or structures required to properly convey the Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 14 of 15 ends

drainage. The construction of drainage structures shall comply with the standards set forth by the San Diego Regional
Standard Drawings.
l. Post Construction Best Management Practices meeting City and RWQCB Order No. R9-2013-001 requirements shall be
implemented in the drainage design.
m. No increase in cross-lot drainage shall be allowed.
n. Prior to obtaining a Building Permit, submit a building pad certification statement from a soils engineer and an engineer or land surveyor licensed in Land Surveying per SBMC

15.40.230E.
o. The Applicants shall obtain the Grading Permit prior or concurrently to Building Permit issuance.

D. City Council Conditions:

VII. N/A
I. ENFORCEMENT
Pursuant to SBMC 17.72.120(B) failure to satisfy any and all of the abovementioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SBMC Chapters 1.1.6 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.

II. EXPIRATION
The Development Review Permit and Structure Development Permit for the project will expire 24 months from the date of this Resolution, unless the Applicants have obtained building permits and has commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the application may be granted by the City Council according to SBMC 17.72.110.

III. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
The Applicants shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney’s fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicants of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification.

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely – 211 Ocean St.

Page 15 of 15 ends

In the event of such election, the Applicants shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicants regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the Applicants shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicants.

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 12th day of January, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
______________________________

LESA HEBNER, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk l EXISTING SITE w TOBE REMOVE
t.½
i
i
3TJNG CONC S!DEV/ tfY DAMAGED/ BROK
iy,IElS TO BE REPAIR ' PER SDRSO
1-
w
w
0::

I- f CJ)
z
<l'.
w .U
J, 0

75.7 FENCE
~\ 72-2BW
EXISTING R TAIN!NG WALL

OREMAIN
'27"W 186 50'

HIGH FENCE & GATE

NEW SITE RETAINING WALL

TO REPLACE EXISTING
Non-landscaoed Areaa
NOtMITI(tated LandscanP.t,
lrrl(rnled landscaoo
Water Featuresc
Decorative Hordscaf)P,.(!
Total Lot Area
I lrnqated Landscaoo
,I Water Featuresc
I Oecomt!VB' Hardscane-==
Em;tmg
!SF,
Area of Wa.J<l:e l (SF)
1,625 I
492 I
560 I
zsn I
Proposed
Tola! rSFJ
5,683
0 1,625
492
560
8,360
LINE OF SITE WALL RAISED BOND LINE OF EXISTING 0 REMAIN BEAM BEHfNO POOL SHED TO BE REMOVED CONG. SQUARES W/ JOINTS FILLED W/ROC~
;i=:::;::;;:==~1 ~~~-·-~.:.-=·-:--~-"·-- =~ ;~:;2;:..c.;=.:.::::.-':c:...:..:.:;;;:.:_ ___ ~- P.A.
'" \ -ire "-5RAtN (TYPICAL)
PA
' -/
/
,, /
/1
,r
/
v ,/I
,-
1 ~ ✓ L.f!:t
L_J[___JL__JL~i,c..:...J. /
"' '>~
,r::' (- -({/ CONC. SQUARES W/ //J JO!NTS FlLLED WIAOCK !TE WALL
,// , 0 BE REMOVED
£:(/re"''"?"'>,;,~_;
.,1.f/ .,,. .'"!, ~
,,., -v '\ ro°' ✓/ -:,"' ..
,,f' </
'
FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES 1, OBSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION:

All roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width
~uring_ constructio!1 and maintained free and clear, mcludmg the parking of vehicles, in accordance with the California Fire Code and the Solana Beach Fire
Department.

2. ADDRESS NUMBERS: STREET NUMBERS:

Approved numbe~s ~nd/or. a~dresses shall be placed
on ~I! new and ~x1stmg buildtngs and at appropriate
additional locations as to be plainly visible and legible fr~m th~ str~et or roadway fronting the property from
either dJrect1on of approach. Said numbers shall
contrast with their background, and shall meet the
following minimum standards as to size: 4" high with a 1/2 "stroke for residential buildings, 8" high with a ½" stroke for commercial and multi-residential
buildings, 12" high with a 1" stroke for industrial
buildings. Additional numbers shall be required where
deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear
access doors, building corners, and entrances to
commercial centers.

3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS: Structures shall be prot.ected by a.n automatic fire sprinkler system
designed and installed to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department Plans for the au1omatic fire sprinkler
system shall be approved by the Fire Department
prior to installation.

4. SMOKE DETECTORS/CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS/FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM; Smoke detector~ I carbon monoxide alarms / fire sprinklers
shall be mspected by the Solana Beach Fire
Department.

5. CLASS "A" ROOF: All Structures shall be provided
with a Class "A~ Roof covering to the satisfaction of
the Solana Beach Fire Department
ATTACHMENT 2

PROJECT INFORMATION
APN: 263-042-05·00
SITE ADDRESS: 211 OCEAN STREET SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

LOT 14, IN BLOCK 3 OF SOLANA BEACH VISTA, IN THE

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE
OF CA., ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL MAP THEREOF NO,
2143, FILED IN THE OFFIC OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY
RECORDER ON DECEMBER 17, 192B
ZONE: MRd
SPECIAL ZONE OVERLAY:

OCCUPANCY:

Scaled Residential Overlay
R-3/U-1
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VS
SPRINKLERS:

EXISTING LOT USE:

NFPA 13D SPRINKLERS REQ.

EXISTING SFR
PROPOSEO USE:

LOT COVERAGE:

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
N/A
OFF STREET PARKING: 2 SPACES REQUIRED
FRONT SETBACK:

SIDE SETBACK:
20'-0" (ROW 5S'·O")
5'-0"
STREET SIDE SETBACK:

REAR SETBACK:

MAX BLDG HEIGHT:

PROPOSED BLDG HGT:

LOT AREA: GROSS
LOT AREA: NET
10'-0"
25'-0"
25'·0"
24'-10"
8,360 SF
B,360 SF
FLOOR TO AREA RATIO ALLOWABLE:

Q.50 X 6,000 = 0,175 X 2 360 = 3,000 s.f.
413 s.f.

Maximum F!oor Area Allowed
PROPOSED BUILDING AREA:
3,413 s.f.

NEW FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA :

NEW SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA:

NEW GARAGE:

SUBTOTAL OF FLOOR AREA:
1,713 SF
1,60B SF
4BS SF
3,806 SF
OFF STREET PARKING EXEMPTION (2 SPACES)
TOT Al PROPOSED FLOOR AREA
-400.0 SF

3.406 SF
COV, DECKS:

COV. PATIO:
435 SF
245 SF
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT: 451 SF
PARKING:
2 PARKING SPACES IN GARAGE.

EARTHWORK QUANTITIES:

SITE GRAOING:
30 CY-CUT)
80 CY· FILL)
5 CY- EXCAVATION FOOTINGS
100 CY- REMOVAL & RECOMPACTION
215 CY· TOTAL GRAOING

SO CY- TOTAL IMPORT
OWNER/ APPLICANT:

FORD AND CASSIE BLAKELY
211 OCEAN STREET
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
858-213-6562
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE:

CRAIG FRIEHAUF

FRIEHAUF ARCHITECTS INC,
85B.792.6116
friehaufinc@sbcg!obat.net
ADU EARTHWORK QUANTITIES:

SITE GRADING:
5 CY· CUT)
0 CY· FILL)
0 CY· EXCAVATION FOOTINGS
16 CY- REMOVAL & RECOMPACT!ON
21 CY- TOTAL GRADING
5 CY· TOTAL EXPORT
@

RRCHITECTS
□
DATE:

MAR 18, 2021 MAY 6, 2021 JUNE 18, 2021 OCT 21, 2021 DEC 17, 2021 ai
c;
ro
.0
0 0)
(.)
.0
©)
"'
(.)
:§
::,
(1l
.c
E
SHEET NO.
-
...,. ___ 0
%
CLS#1625
5 * I<;
ENCUMBRANCES:

EXISTING ENCUMBRANCES LJS1ED BELOW ARE PER A PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY TITLE 365 DA1ED JULY 24, 2016
AS ORDER NO 410-1402082-40.

COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS AS SET FORTH IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 7, 1941 IN BOOK 1163 AND PAGE 2D9. OF omcIAL RECORDS,

BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANT, CONDITION OR RESTRICTION, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS • OR NATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND ONLY TO THE EX1ENT THAT THE COVENANT, CONDITION OR RESTRICTION (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER TITLE 42 OF THE UNl1ED STA1ES CODE. OR (8) RELA1ES TO HANDICAP, BUT DOES NOT DISCRIMINA1E AGAINST HANDICAPPED PERSONS.

SAID COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS PROVIDE THAT A VIOLATION

THEREOF SHALL NOT DEFEAT OR RENDER INVALID THE LIEN OF ANY MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST MADE IN GOOD FAITH AND FOR VALUE.

AN EASEMENT FOR RIGHT OF WAY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 2367 OF DEEDS. PAGE 207.

SAID EASEMENT ROU1E ADJACENT TO EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 14. NO EASEMENT LIMITS PROVIDED.
1111
\ \\ \ ifl RIM-=76,29
~IE IN=?0.34
SRAPriIC SCALE
\\ ~ \
\ .f,
10 20
\
\ \
u;
\
\ ,T7 9cCINl S1lEET OCINITAS. CA 92024 PH 1760lal-6025 FAXl760}231H025

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
11@'ii'~li5
\
\
\
\
\
\

EXISTING

BUILDING
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
11,@'jj'~:ll
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
11,@'jj'~(!l
11,@'jj'@'
11@'ii'l!l
!'---.

EXISTING

BUILDING
l1@'ii' ~Ill
OWNER:

FORD AND CASSIE BLAKELY
ADDRESS:
211 OCEAN STREET

SOLANA BEACH, CA
APN:
263-042-05
BENCHMARK:

3.5" 0/AME1ER NATIONAL GEOOEO/C SURVEY DISC
MARKED "Jl415, 1987" LOCATED IN THE TOP OF
THE HEADWALL THAT IS 0.2 MILES NORTH OF SOLANA VISTA DRIVE ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTHBOUND HIGHWAY 101, 3 FET OFF OF THE

SHOULDER ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF SOLANA
BEACH SURVEY CONTROL RECORD OF SURVEY NO.
18971.

ELEVATION = 34.670'
DATUM = NAVO 88
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

LOT 14, IN BLOCK 3 OF SOLANA BEACH VISTA, IN

THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO, STA1E OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE
omCIAL MAP THEREOF NO. 2143, FILED IN THE
omcE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON
DECEMBER 17, 1928.

NOTES:

I. BEARINGS ANO DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE DERIVED
FROM AN Ev10ENCE BASED BOUNDARY SURVEY PERFORMED
ON JUNE 18, 2019.

2. PLEASE N01E THAT THIS SURVEY HAS NOT IDENTIFIED ANY
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES THAT MAY EXIST UNLESS OTHERl'.lSE SHOWN.

3. TREES THAT ARE LESS THAN 6" IN OIAME1ER HAVE NOT BEEN LOCA 1EO, UNLESS OTHERl\lSE SHOWN.

LEGEND:

EC IND/CA 1ES EDGE OF CONCRE1E
EP IND/CA 1ES EDGE OF PAVEMENT
FFE IND/CA 1ES FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
FL IND/CA 1ES FLOW UNE
FS INOICA1ES FINISHED SURFACE
G IND/CA 1ES GROUND
TW IND/CA 1ES TOP OF WALL
WALL
SEl\£R MAIN ---s------

OVER HEAD LINE

CHAIN LINK FENCE

WOOD FENCE
ME1ER 0
SANITARY SEl\£R MANHOLE @
POl\£R POLE ,u,
PREPARED BY: COASTAL LAND SOLUTIONS, INC.
577 SECOND STRffT
ENCINITAS, CA 92D24 760-230-6025
DATE OF SURVEY: JUNE-JULY 2019
7-17-2019
DATE
fOVOECK
I
I
FIRST FLR PLAN SCALE:118" - 1'·0"
~!IIAC>(UM:o
ITT ourooon
-..,,-- -
' '
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
,------+------~~~---+--..fr==,;...,_----+-----------------------------------------~ /
/
/
SECOND FLR PLAN scALE:11s· = 1•.oH
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
ra

ARCHITECTS
□
DATE:

MAR 18, 2021
MAY 6, 2021 JUNE 18, 2021
OCT 21, 2021
DEC 17, 2021
SHEET NO.
ra

ARCHITECTS
Main Flo scAL ,,, •• = , •• ~r AREA
□
STAIR SE SCALE,118" = 1·-0· CTION DATE:
2nd FloorAR scALE:1ts· = 1•.o~ EA
SHEET NO.
8 ~~;:.:~
i~i,w'~;HT/
, I ! r
i
i
\-aittRMJ
!-wy
!
SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"
SOUTH ELEVATION - STORY POLE SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"
EAST ELEVATION SCALE:1/8" - 1'-0"
i r~TYUMo
!
!
!
!
i
I
I
I
I
I
!
!
EAST ELEVATION - STORY POLE SCALE:1/8" - 1'-0"
WEST ELEVATION SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"
WEST ELEVATION - STORY POLE SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"
i
PRCWtRTYU,4-.---i
!
!
!
!
!
!
i
!
!
!
I"'
NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/8" - 1'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION - STORY POLE SCALE:1I8" = 1'-0"
~
ta

HRCHITECTS
□
DATE:

MAR 18, 2021
MAY 6, 2021 JUNE 18, 2021
OCT 21, 2021
DEC 17, 2021
SHEET NO.
' ' I

I --,,'---- ,,
' I
!
I ~ I -
I
~! ;I
"' ~· ----- !'_ F
4'
~~Of :.--------
>STFL:!.=,
mo FLOOR ruoae
-- ~ - ..;_-_ --- ~?1'~#33 - ------ ,.~ SUPPORT POLE
N09'08'13'W 14613' - - - __,;; --- - - -
r-~ttlOW¾OfffitllTfl.OCrn
I
Roof Plan SCAL :118" = 1'·0~

STORY PO
scALE1ia· = ,·.o· LE PLAN
/10LE#25

87.91'ROOF

75.GS'EG
757S'FG
@

ARCHITECTS
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
□ :~:~
7583'EG \
7S.75'FG \
DATE:
~~KTING RESIDEN~ RAILING ST CE V RISING STRING RING LINE FLAT STRING Ll~~NE

TRELLIS STRING LINE
SHEET NO.
~

GENERAL NOTES

1. APPROVAf.. OF THIS GRADING Pl.AN VOES NOT CONSTTTUT£ APPROVAf. OF ',,£R71CAL OR HORIZONTAL AUGNMENT OF ANY PRfVA TE ROAO SHO'ltN HEREJN FOR PUBUC ROAD PURPOS£S.

2. FINAL APPROVAL OF THESE GRADING PLANS /S SUB,£CT TO FINAL APPROVAL OF TH£ ASSOCIATED IMPROISIENT PLANS l\fiffif: APPUCABL£. FINAL CURB GR AOC £L£VA nc;,s MA y RE OU/RE CHANG£$ IN THESE PLANS.

3. IMPORT MATERIALS SHALL BE LEGALLY OBTA!NED.

4. A SEPARATE PERUIT FROM THE CITY ENGtNffR lffll. B£ RE()UIRED FOR ANY iIDRK IN THE PUBLJC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

5. ALL SLOPES 01£/? THREE (3) FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL 8£ LANDSCAPED AND IRRIGATED.

6. TH£ CON1RACTOR SHALL lf:RIFY TH£ £XJST£NCE AND LOCA no;, OF ALL unun£s BEFORE COIIMENCING WORK. NOTICE OF PROPOS£D WORK SHALL 8£ GIVEN TO 1H£ FaLOVtfNG AG£NCIES:

UNDERGROUND S.A. (800)-227-2600

7. A SOILS REPORT SHALL 8£ PRO\IDED AS R£0UIR£D BY TH£ CITY OF SOLANA BEACH PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING P£RJJIT.

8. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY ENGINEER DOCS NOT AUTHORIZE ANY troRK OR GRADING TO B£ PERFORMED UNTIL TH£ PROPERTY 0111/ER'S PERMISSION HAS BEEN OBTA!NED AND A VAUD GRADING PERI/IT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

9. THE CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS D0£S NOT CON5111UTE TH£ BUILDING OFF1C/AL'S APPROVAL OF ANY FOUNDATIW FOR S1RUC11JR£S TO BE PLACED c;, TH£ AREA CO\£RED BY THESE PLANS. NO WA11£R OF TH£ GRADING ORDINANCE R[OU/REIIENTS CONCERNING J.IINIIIUII CO\£R 01£1? EXPANSI\£ SOILS IS MAO£ OR IMPUED.

10. ALL OP£RA110NS CONDUCTED ON THE PR9,IISES, INCLUDING THE WARMING UP, REPAIR, ARRIVAL. D£PARTUR£ OR RUNNING OF 111/JCKS, EARTHMO\ING £0UIPM£NT, CONS1RUCTIW £0/JIPMENT AND ANY OTHER ASSOC/A TED GRADING EOUfPMENT SHALL BE UM/TED TO THE PERIOD 8£TVtE£N 7: 00 o.m. AND 6: 00 p.m. EACH DAY.

MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, AND ND tARTHMOWNG OR GRADING OPERA 710NS SHAU. 8£ CONDUCTED ON TH£ PREMISES ON SA 1URDA Y.S, SUNDAYS OR HOUDA YS YrfTHOUT TH£ VIRITTEN PERMISSION OF TH£ CITY ENGtNffR.

11. ALL MAJOR SLCff:S SHALL 8£ ROUNDED INTO EXISTING TERRAJN TO PRODUCE A CONTOURED TRANSITION FROM CUT OR ALL FAC£S TO NA1URAL GROUND AND ABUTnNG CUT OR ALL FACES.

12. NOTt\lTHSTANDING TH£ MINIMUM STANDARDS SET FORTH IN TH£ GRADING OROINANCf. AND NOTt\lTHSTAND/NG TH£ APPROVAL OF THESE GRADING PLANS. TH£ PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREl1:NTIW OF DAMAGE TO 11-1£ ADJACENT PROPERTY. NO PERSON SHALL £XCAVA 1E: ON LAND SO CLOS£ 10 TH£ PROPERTY UN£ AS TO ENDANGER ANY ADJOINING PUBUC S111£ET, SIDEWALK, ALLEY, FUNCTION OF ANY SEWAGE DISPOSAL Sl'SJEll, OR ANY OTHER PUBUC OR PRIVA1c PROPERTY "'THOUT SUPPORTING AND PR01cCTING SUCH PROPERTY FROM SETTUNG, CRACKING, £ROS/ON, SILTING SCOUR OR 01H£R DAMAGE VIH/CH MIGHT RESULT FROM TH£ GRADING DESCRIBED ON THIS PW-I. TH£ CITY ltl'LL H(Xf) 1H£ P£RMIT1E:£ RESPONSIBLE FOR CORR£C110N ON NC,,-0£0/CA TED IMPROISIENTS I\HICH DAMAGE ADJACENT PROPERTY

13. SLOPE RATIOSc CUT 1,2 FILL 1,2
CUT: 30 CY FILL: 80 CY IMPORT: 50 CY
(NOIE: A SEPARA1c VAUD PERMIT MUST £X/5T FOR OFl'S/Ic IMPORT OR EXPORT AREAS.) •• TH£ OUANT/11£5 EST/MA TED ABO\£ AR£ FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR CON51RUCTION BIDS. CON1RACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THfJR 01111 EARTHWORK OUANTITIES. 14-. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: IF ANY ARCHAELOGICAL RESOURCES ARE DISCOVERED ON THE SITE OF THIS GRADING DURING GRADING OPERATIONS, SUCH OPERA nc;,s "'LL CEASE IMMEDIA 1E. Y. AND TH£ PERM/TT££ "'LL NOTIFY TH£ CITY ENGINEER OF TH£ DISCO\£RY. GRADING OPERA TIWS "'LL NOT COIIM£NCE UNTIL TH£ PERM/TT££ HAS RcCEJVED ~TTEN AUTHORITY FROM TH£ CITY £NGfNITR 10 DO SO.

15. ALL GRADING SHOlm ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE COMPl.£TE:D AS A SINGULAR UNIT YrfTH NO PROWS/ON FOR PARTIAL REL£ASES. SHOULD IT 8£ ANTICIPA1cD THAT A PORTION OF THIS PRO.£CT 8£ COMPL£1ED SEPARA1E:LY. A SEPARATE PLAN AND PERMIT APPUCA110N SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL

16. TH£ CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY TH£ CITY OF SOLANA BEACH 858.720.24-70 24- HOURS BEFORE GRADING OPERA TIWS BEGIN.

17. FINISHED GRADING ANO PLANTING SHALL B£ ACCOUPLJSHED ON ALL SLOP£$ PRIOR TO OCT08ER 1, OR /MMEDIAfilY UPON COMPLETION OF ANY SLOPES GRADED BE:TK£EN OCTOBER 1 AND APRIL 1. PRIOR TO ANY PLANTING, ALL LANDSCAPING SHAU. BE APPROW BY TH£ PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT TH£ DEV£l.OPU£NT R£\1EW STAG£, OR BY SEPARATE: LANDCSAPE PLAN.

18. ALL OFF-Sl1c HAUL ROUTES SHALL 8£ SUBMITTED BY THE CON1RACTOR TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL 72 HOURS PRIOR 1V TH£ BEGINNING OF MJRK.

19. UPON ANAL COMPL£110N OF TH£ IKlRK UNDER THE GRADING PERMIT, BUT PRIOR TO ANAL GRADING APPROVAL AND/OR FINAL REL£ASE OF SECURITY, AN AS-GRADED CERTIFICA1c SHALL BE PRO\IOED STATING, "'TH£ GRADING UNDfR PERMIT No. SBGR-216 HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE KITH TH£ APPROW GRADING PLAN OR AS SHOl\fi ON TH£ ATTACHED AS-GRADED PLAN". THIS STATDJENT SHALL BE FOLLOIIED BY THE DA 7c AND SIGNA TUR£ OF THE C/\!L ENGINEER WHO CERTIFIES SUCH A GRADING OPERA no;,.

20. THE CONTRACTOR SHAU. DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, AND MAINTAJN ALL SAFETY DE\1C£S INCLUDING SHORING. AND SHALL 8£ R£SPON518L£ FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL STA Jf, AND FEDfRAL SAFETY A.ND HEAL 1H STANDARDS, LAWS AND REGULA11i5.

I
' I n
I
i
,J':ll._,
E-,
~-'""
~l
t:l".ll
~I
gJ
! AV'fEXJSOOORSNI) _/. " i,
I --GUTTERIH4TIS - -4' l o.w<Gl:l)S/'"1.B£-leiswi
55' REPA!REDPER~(;.2 '
-----------!
~-----~-~------· 1-,s---':

EROSION CONTROL NOTES PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 1. STORM WATER AND NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGE CONTROL: BEST J.IANAGEMENT PRAC11CES SHALL 8£ DEVE1.0P£D ANO /MPLEl,i£NTED TO J.IANAG£ STORM WATER AND NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM TH£ SITE: AT ALL TIMES DURING EXCAVATION AND GRADING AC1M11ES.

2. EROS/OIi ANO SEDIMENT CON11IOl.c EROSION PR£V0010N SHAJ.L 8£ £1/PHASIZED AS TH£ MOST IMPORTANT MEASURE FOR KEEPING SE:DIMENT ON SnE DURING EXCAVATION AND GRADING ACTM11£S.

SED/1/ENT CON1ROLS SHAJ.L 8£ USED AS A SUPPLEMENT TO EROSION PRE\£NTION FOR K£EP/NG SED/MENT ON SITE:.

J. EROSION CONTROL ON SLOPES SHALL BE MmGAT£D BY JNSTAWNG LANDSCAPING AS PER APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS AS REOU/RED BY THE D£V£!.OPMENT RE\IEW COND/110N5, OR BY JEl/PORARY EROSION CON1ROL CONFORMING TO TH£ FOLLOWING, ~
20 50
8 6
L
91 NOO-IRRIGATFQ tiYQROSEED WIX Wl1H
A fl8fR MATRIX Af'Pl /ED AT i: 000 LB/ACRE % Pi/RUY/ACRE 70% PLUS

SCARIFIED
50% PLUS
A1RIPL£X
~
GLAUCA

PWITAGE INSULARIS
ENCEl/5 FARINOSA

LOTUS SCOPAR/US
EXCHSCHOL7Zl< CALIF.
4-. TH£ TOPS OF ALL SLOPES TALLER THAN 5' SHALJ. 8£ DIKED OR TRENCHED TO PR£\IENT WATER Fl.OWING Ol£R CRESTS OF SLOPES.

S. CATCH BASINS, D£SILTING BASINS, AND STORM ORAJN S\'SIDIS SHALL 8£ INSTALLED TO TH£ SA71SFACT10N OF 1H£ CfTY ENGINITR.

6. SNID BAG CHECK DAJ./5, SILT FENCES, FIBER ROLLS OR OTHER APPROl£D BMP'S SHALL 8£ PLACED IN UNPAVED AAF.AS Vr'fTH GRADIENTS IN EXCESS OF 2:f, AS WEIL AS AT OR NEAR £vfRY POINT WHERE CONC£N1RATED Fl.OW LEA\£ TH£ Sl1E

7. SNID BAGS SHALL BE PLACED ON TH£ UPS111£AM SIDE OF ALL ORAJNAGE INL£TS TO MINIMIZE SILT BUILDUP IN THE INLETS mD PIPES.

8. THE CONlRACTOR SHALL REPA!R ANY ERODED SLOPES AS DIR£CT£D BY THE omCE OF TH£ C/1Y ENGINEER.

9. TH£ CON1RACTOR SHAJ.L 5WW' RO<DWAYS AND £N1RANCES TO AND FROM THE SITE ON A REGULAR BASIS TO KEEP THEIi FREE OF SOIL ACCUMULATION AND AT ALL OTHER TIMES DIRECTED BY TH£ CITY ENGINEER.

10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER SITE: ON A CONTINIJOUS BASIS TO MIN/ll/Z£ A!R BORN£ DUST CREATED FIIOII GRADING AND HAUUNG OPERATIONS OR EXCESSIVE WIND COND/110N5, AND AT ALL TIMES DIRECTED BY TH£ CITY ENGINEER.

11. IN TH£ EVENT SILT DOES ENTER TH£ EXISTING PUBLIC STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, REJ.IOVAL OF THE SILT FROM TH£ TH£ SYSTEM WILL BE DON£ AT TH£ 0£\lfLOPER'S EXPENSE

ABBREVIATIONS
CENTER UN£ CL
PROPERTY UN£ PL IN\1:RT El.EVA TION /£ FINS/HED Fl.DOR FF FINISHED GRAD£ FG FINISHED SURFACE FS Fl.OW UN£ Fl. PROPOSED El.EVA 1/0N XXX.X 1fflt7!St-G lf/j,VA 1/0N (fsXX.X)
BOTTO/J OF SJEP es PLANTER AREA P.A. TOP OF CURB TC TOP OF GRAT£ TG TOP OF WALL 1W FRONT YARD S£7BACK FYSB REAR YARD SETBACK RYSB SID£ YARD S£7BACK SYSB TOP OF WALL AT FINISHED GRAD£ TWOF'G BOTTOM OF WALL AT FINISHED GRAD£ BWOf'G ROOF DOl\ti SPOUT DS EXISTING CONDITION IMPERVIOUS, 4,000 SF
PERVIOUS: 4-,360 SF
PROPOSED CONDITION IMPERV10US: 4,34-2 SF
HARDSCAPE:, 1,683 SF
BUILDING, 2,208 SF
ADU, 451
PERY10US: 4-.018SF
l).NOSCAPE: 1,•U9 SF
PER\IOUS, 1,889 SF
l'OOLc 645 SF
BMP: 65 SF

PL TOP OF WALL

FINISHED GRADE
(TW@FG)
TOP OF
WN.J.(TW)
TYPICAL WALL CROSS SECTION.

ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN
NOT 1V SCA!£
VOID FILL£R " TO j" (N0.8)
AGGREGA1c IN VO/OS
B£DDING COURSE-2"' THICK
OF j' TO j" (N0.8) AGGREGA7c
PER\IOUS PA\£RS W/ MIN. j" VOID
6" X 16" PCC Fl.USH CURB
OR DEEPENED G-1 CURB + PA.
~ s 5JDEW,\LK D.G.

MIN. 6"' THICK
OF ¾" CRUSHED ROCK

SOIL SUBGRADE
N01c, NOTTO SCALE
-ALL AGGREGA1c MUST 8£ CL£AN/WASHED AND FIi££ OF FINES (SNID, SILT. ETC.) -THE PAl£R5 SHALL NOT 8£ SFJ,;£[) ONCE THE VOID FILL£R HAS BEEN AD0£D -EACH COURSE SHALL BE V1BRATORY COUPACTED BEFORE PLACEMENT OF NEXT COURSE -ND /1/PER\IOUS UNER OR FILTER FABRIC IS TO 8£ USED -SPECIAL APPROVAL R£0UIR£D FOR USE IN HIGHLY EXPANS/1£ SDIL - SUBORAJN /JAY 8£

REOUIRED
•~ONSTRUC110N NOTE: -PAl£R5 TO BE CO\£R£D AND PROicCTED DURING CONS1RUCTION LOT15
'--EX1S1111GRESWICE
TOE!Ere.tJJSIE/J

PROPOSED RESIDENCE
F.F. 76.42
PAD75.75
CURBOUT1.ET
FER 5DRSD 0.27
Fl. 72.0
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN SOJE, 1· = 10'
D.G.@2%
EX.SJDEWALK
BASIN DETAIL NOT TO SCAl£
7 --- - 0 10

ENGINEER OF WORK CITY APPROVED CHANGES APP'D DATE RECOMMENDEDFORAPPROVAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION ~
Drawn By
y: ""-Ore OA.·~oate: ___ f-------------t--"t---1By: -------------- By:-------------- amc:j'>-) BRIAN ARQO{ INQ 1-------------+--+--J Review Engineer 1------CityEngin~ R.C.E. 71651 Exp, l2LJJL2.! 1-------------t--+--J D,t,c ---- Date: ___ _ VICINITY MAP 1/0TTOSOJE
SCALE: 1~ = 10'
I 20 30
1W75,8
R
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 14, IN BLOCK 3 OF SOI.AM BEACH VISTA, IN THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, COUNTY OF SN/ DIEGO, STA1c OF CAUFORN/A, ACCORDING TO TH£ OFFICIAL WP THEREOF NO. 2143, FILED IN TH£ OFFICE OF THE SN/ DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON DEC£1/8£R 17, 1928.

A.P.N.: 263-042-05
SITE ADDRESS :

OWNERIPERMITTEE:

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY :

WORK TO BE DONE
211 OCEAJI S111£E SDI.ANA BFACH, CA 92075
FORO AND CASSI£ BLAKELY 211 OCEAJI S1R£ET
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
COASTAL LAND SOLU110NS
(760)2J0-6025
THE IMPROIS/ENTS CONSIST OF THE FOLLOl!1NG WORK TO 8£ DONE ACCORDING TO THESE PLANS AND THE LATEST EDmON5 OF,
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (1) STANDARD SP£C/FICATION5 FOR PUBUC WORKS CONS1RUC110N INCLUDING TH£ REGIOOIL SUPPLEMENTAL AMENDMENTS. (2) CAUFORNIA DEP.wMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "MANI./AL OF TRAFFIC CON1ROLS FOR CONS1RUC110N ANO WJNT£NANCE WORK ZONES"
(J) STA7c OF CAUFORN/A, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

STANDARD DRAWINGS
(I) SN/ DIEGO REG/0/IAL STANDARD DRA•1NGS
(2) STA1c OF CAUFORN/A, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD PLANS LEGEND
~P710N
PROP£l/1Y UN£
CEJITERUN£ OF ROAD
PROPOSED S£TllACI($

PROPOSED HARDSCAPE PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLANS
PROPOSED CONTOUR UN£
EXJSTING CONTOUR UN£

PROPOSED /MSONRY RETNNING WALL PER PLAN

EXISTING /MSONRY RETAINING WALL
PROPOSED D£COIIPOSED GRANITE (D.G.)
PROPOSED 4-/IIC// ST0/111 DRIJII
PROPOSED ROOF DOWN 5PO/!T

OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
1:- ,-, ... .-..: . .-1 -----i51-----
== === == a:::: === .
/, ===-c==-====== AS OWNER/DEVELOPER OF TH£ PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN ACKNOWLEDGE THESE PLANS H4V£ 8££N PREPARED AT MY DIRECTION WITH MY FULL CONSENT. I FULLY UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT THE TERMS AND CONDmo/15 CONTA!NED H£R£/N AND AS ATTACHED BY REFERENCE ON THIS GRADING PLAN. fT IS AGREED THAT F1ELD CONDmONS .IMY R£QUIR£ CHANGES TO THESE PLANS.

IT /S FURTHER AGREED THAT TH£ OWNER (D£V£!.OPER) SHAJ.L HA\£ A REG/51ERED CML ENGINEER MAK£ SUCH CHANGES, ALTERATIONS OR A00/1/0/IS TO THESE PLANS WHICH THE CITY ENGINEER DETERMINES ARE NECESSARY AND DESIRABLE FOR THE PROPER COIIPL£TION OF TH£ IMPROVEMENTS.

I FURTHER AGREE TO COJ.IIIENCE WORK ON ANY 11/PROIS/ENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WITHIN EXISTING CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY WfTHIN 60 /l,\YS OF TH£ CONS1RUCTION PERMIT AND TO PURSUE SUCH WORK AC11V£LY ON £YERY NORW.I.. WORKING DAY UNTIL COUPLETED, IRRESPEC71VE AND INDEPENDENT OF ANY OTHER WORK ASSOCL>ITED WITH THIS PROJECT OR UNDER MY CON1ROL
FORO AND CASS/£ BLAKELY
211 OCEAJI S111£E SOI.AM BEACH, CA 92075

DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
DATE
I, 8RWI M. ARDOUNO, HEREBY DECLARE 11-IAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR THIS PROJECT. THAT I HA\£ EXCERCISED RESPO/ISIBLE CHARGE Ol£R TH£ DESIGN OF TH£ PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE B1JS/IIESS AND PROFESSIONS COO£, AND

THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS AND THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH RESOLU110N No. 2007-170.

I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHECK OF PROJECT ORA1!1NG5 AND SPECIFICATIONS BY THE CITY OF Sot»IA BFACH IS CONFINED 1D A REVIEW ONLY AND DOES NOT RE.UM ME OF R£SPONSf8JLm£S FOR PROJECT DESIGN,
BY,, _______________ _
BRL>IN ARDOUNO RC£ No. 71551 EXP 12/J 1/2021 PASCO LARET SUTIER & ASSOCIATES ADU EARTHWORK QUANTITIES : EARTHWORK QUANTITIES :

SITE GRADING,
CUT: 5 CY
F1LL: 0 CY
EXCAVATION FOR F0071NG5: 0 CY
SITE GRADING (OUTSIDE OF S1RUCTUR£),
cur, JO CY
ALL: 80 CY
EXCAVATION FOR FOOTINGS: 5 CY
REMOVAL d: R£COMPACOON (UNDER S1RUCTUR£): 16 CY REI/OVAL & RECOMPACOON (UNDER S1RUCTUR£), 100 CY TOTAL GRADING : 21 CY
TOTAL EXPORT: 5 CY
TOTAL GRADING (CUT AND FILL OUTSIDE & BELOW 51RUCTUR£) , 215 CY TOTAL IMPORT: SO CY
EARTHWORK QIJAN1111£S AR£ £SITUATED FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY AND R£PRES£NT COMPACTED (IN PLACE) VOLUI/ES ONLY. THESE VALUES AR£ CALCULATED ON A TH£0R£11CAL BASIS. ACTUAL OUANTTTJES MAY VARY DU£ TO OBS£R\1'£D SHRINKAGE AND/OR swaL FACTORS.

COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO.

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH PRELJMINARY GRADING PLAN FOR:
211 OCEAN STREET
DRAWlNGNO.

DRP21-004
SDPll-004
SHEET 1 OF J
0 NORTH
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'

BIOFILTRATION
AREA

DECOMPOSED

GRANITE
0 ~-- 16 24
FEET
DOUBLE--_,~-
GATE
42" HIGH
PROVIDE HANDRAIL---+-+-/
42" HIGH FENCE ---H---

CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
APRON IN RlGHT-OF•WAY
!

LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING
<[ SPOTLIGHT UPLIGHTING TREE FX LUMINAIRE VS UPLIGHT • 6 LEOS {WITH GROUND SPIKE) 10 WATT • NATURAL BRASS/COPPER FINISH
◊ ~RN\~t~tL~t~E~~1NJi~~TLEt( LUMINAIRE HC

PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL
.0
~ ©
w
~
®

DESCRIPTION

ACCA (FEIJOA) SELLOWIANA - PINEAPPLE GUAVA

AEONIUM 'SUNBURST' - SUNBURST AEONIUM

ALOE STRIATA - GHOST ALOE

CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM - CAPE RUSH

DIANELLA 'LITTLE REV'

DIETES BICOLOR - FORTNIGHT LILY

LIMONIUM PEREZII - STATICE

MUHLENBERGIA RIG ENS - DEER GRASS

RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'MINOR' - DWARF YEDDO

WESTRINGIA 'GRAY BOX' - COAST ROSEMARY

BOUGAINVILLEA BARBARA KARST'

ESPALLIER ONTO WALUFENCE

OLEA 'SWANN HILL' - FRUITLESS OLIVE

FRUIT TREE - DWARF MEYER LEMON

BEARRS LIME NAVEL ORANGE

PITTOSPORUM 'SILVER SHEEN'
KOHUHU

MULCHED SHRUB AREA
BARK OR ROCK MULCH - 3" DEPTH
BIOBASIN:

CAREX TUMILICOLA - BERKELEY SEDGE

WITH REINFORCED RICE STRAW MATTING ON SIDES

PLANTING AND REINFORCED STRAW MATTING
MATURE
HEIGHT
18'-25'
2'
2'
3'
2'
2'
2'
3'
4'
2'-3'
30'
20'-35'
8'-10'
12'-15'
SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL SIDE SLOPES OF THE BIO-BASIN.

WATER MIN.

USE SIZE
LOW 5 GAL.

LOW 1 GAL.

LOW 5GAL.

LOW 5 GAL.

LOW 1 GAL.

LOW 5GAL.

LOW 1 GAL.

LOW 5GAL.

LOW 5 GAL.

LOW 5GAL.

TRASH ENCLOSURE
4' HIGH SOLID BOARD

FENCE AND GATES

QUANTITY
10 44
29 8
17 3
23 15
54 6
9 LOW 36"BOX
MULTI
SLA 15GAL. 3
MOD 15GAL. 7
1 GAL. 16" O.C.
5' HIGH FENCE AND

GATE PEA POOL BARRIER REQUIREMENT

CONCRETE STEPPING

STONES SET IN

GRAVEL OR OG
(PERMEABLE)

ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) WORKSHEET
fhc pruj::ct·~ !\1inw.h:d lot.ii Water L~ i~ lakulatc<l u~ini,:tl~ folkw,inµ formula:

ETWU =(Ero)(0.62{ t!'._.:_~!!_~ +SIA~
\ 1£
ETWI l = htini;lle<.l hl1a! \\.111.'f u,,.; per ;>cJr (gallrnh per ~<;<In Elo = l:\Jf,<)l.r.ur-.pirati1>1l rmc1inclv..". per :,'l:ar) 1'1· ""l'!am I-actor frum \Vl!COIS{....:c Ddiniti,m,1
HA = H:Um-miw An-J (¼JUJrc fct.·tr lkfinc- h!Um-11n11..., h) \\il!l.'r u\C: ,er) In\\. lo,\. mo,.kr.itc .mJ hifh ~LA = Sp,;,-.:ial l;m,h..,--ape Arca ('¼JU,1n: fcctL r'Al1hlc rkinh, 1rriga1~-.J 1\ith rcc~d~-d \\Ulcr.&. !urt lh1.-<l for acme pin~
0,62 ec{'t1mcr"ion l-:11.i,lf(log.!llon, pcr~4uarc f1"'Jt' ___ ~t~- __ :- lmg.i_l1_~m El!!~i~-1~\

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) WORKSHEET Evapotranspirat1on Rate (ETo)
See "A' below
ConverstCn Factor. 62
(lme 1 x Lme 2)
Plant Factor (PF)
§ee ~-s· ~i_ov.,
(line 4 x lme 5)
lingil1ion Efficiency (IEl
See ·c· below
I {line 6 - Lme 7)
, TOT AL of al! Line 8 boxes + SLA
Lme3xlme9
Esllmated Tota! Water Use • ETWU
(gaMons per year}
Total shall not exceed MAWA below
' A I 1:f,../.""f""'nm;,,m:,,,nra:~~
41 rnc~1 <'f k'•
.f7tca"1of I.:\)
("
MAXIMliM APPLIED WATER APPLICA TIOJ'\ cMAWA) calculation:

25.42 ((ETAh 2.152
25A2i>r29.l.J l1tlJ!l..i1JJ~pcArc-..i
MAWA
)+(I-ET'-1·~."'~;".! >1= 33;t07galloris

ACCESSORY
_DWELLING UNIT

FRUITLESS OLIVE
FRUIT
TREE
(TYP)

HYDROZONES
SYMBOL

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF WORK
AREA
ZONE VEG. TYPE
WATER

USE PLANT FACTOR

0.3 SO. FT. IRRIGATION TYPE IRRIGN. EFFIC.
#1
#2
#3
#4

TREES/SHRUBS LOW
SHRUBS
POOL
CITRUS
TOTAL:

MOD 0.6
WATER FEATURE 1.0

SLA SLA

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATION
1,361
35 492
264
2,152
I am familiar with the requirements for landscape and irrigation plans contained in the City's Water Efficient Landscape Regulations.

I have prepared this plan in compliance with those regulations and the Landscape Design ManuaL I certify that the plan implements those regulations to provide efficient use of water.
( ~, M.0rc,/ OR MERCER ALA #4055
10/20/21
DATE
DRIP 0.81
DRIP 0.81
FILLER PIPE 1.00

DRIP SLA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 990 SEACOAST DRIVE. STE 20
IMPERIAL BEACH. CA 91932
(619) 882-2499
E·mai! [email protected]
COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO X-XX-XXXX·X GMA # 21-003

LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR
APN. 263-191-09·00

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

BLAKELY RESIDENCE
211 OCEAN STREET
DRAWING NO.

SBGR-XXXL
SHEET 1 OF 1
TO:

FROM:

MEETING DATE:

ORIGINATING DEPT:

SUBJECT:

BACKGROUND:

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Gregory Wade, City Manager
November 10, 2021
Community Development Department
Public Hearing: Request for a DRP and SDP to Demolish a Single-Family Residence, Construct a Replacement TwoStory, Single-Family Residence with an Attached Two-Car Garage, and Perform Associated Site Improvements at 211 Ocean St. (DRP21-004/SDP21-004; Applicants: Ford and
Cassie Blakely; APN: 263-042-05; Resolution 2021-128)
The Applicants, Ford and Cassie Blakely, are requesting City Council approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SOP) to demolish a single-family residence, construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 211 Ocean Street. The 8,360 square-foot lot is located within the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and the Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ).

The project proposes grading in the amounts of 30 cubic yards of cut for footings, 80 cubic yards of fill, 5 cubic yards of excavation for footings, 100 cubic yards of removal and recompaction, for an aggregate of 215 cubic yards of grading, and 50 cubic yards of import. The maximum building height is proposed at 25.00 feet above the existing grade with the highest point of the residence at 100.75 MSL. The project meets two thresholds for the requirement of a DRP, including: 1) construction in excess of 60 percent of the maximum allowable floor area and 2) construction of a second story that exceeds 35% of the floor area of the first floor. The project requires a SOP because the proposed development exceeds 16 feet in height above the existing grade.

The issue before the Council is whether to approve , approve with conditions, or deny the Applicants' request as contained in Resolution 2021-128 (Attachment 1 ).

DISCUSSION:

The subject property fronts the south side of Ocean Street and is located one property to CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Approved 5/0 to continue hearing until 01 /12/2022 AGENDA ITEM # B.1 .

November 10, 2021
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 2 of 12 ends

the west of the southwest corner of the North Acacia Avenue and Ocean Street intersection. Ocean Street inclines steeply from the North Acacia Avenue intersection westward to Pacific Avenue at the top of the coastal bluff. The properties along Ocean Street step with the grade. The topography of the subject property is relatively flat; however, there are existing retaining walls along the side property lines. The building pad of the subject property is approximately 10 feet higher than the property located immediately to the east and approximately two feet lower than the lower building pad of the recently developed split-level property located immediately to the west.

The subject lot is surrounded on all sides by residential properties that are located within the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and are developed with one- and two-story homes.

The lot is currently developed with a single-story, single-family residence with an attached garage. The Applicants propose to demolish the existing residence to construct a 3,410 square-foot replacement two-story, single-family residence, and perform associated site improvements including grading, a pool and spa, hardscape, fencing, and landscaping.

The project plans are provided in Attachment 2.

Table 1 (below) provides a comparison of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) applicable zoning regulations with the Applicant's proposed design.

Table 1

LOT INFORMATION
Property Address: 211 Ocean Street Zoning Designation: MR (5-7 du/ac) Lot Size (Net): 8,360 sf. # of Units Allowed: 1 SFR, 1 ADU, 1 JADU Max. Allowable Floor Area: 3,413 sf. # of Units Requested: 1 SFR, 1 ADU Proposed Floor Area: 3,411 sf.

Below Max. Floor Area by: 2 sf. Setbacks: Required Proposed Max. Allowable Height: 25 ft. Front (N) 20 ft. 22 ft.

Max. Proposed Height: 25.00 ft. Interior Side (W) 5 ft. 5 ft.

Highest Point/Ridge: 100.75 MSL Interior Side (E) 5 ft. 5 ft.

Overlay Zone(s): SROZ Rear (S) 25 ft. 58 ft.

PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION
Floor Area Breakdown: Required Permits:

Proposed First Floor 1,713 sf.

Proposed Second Floor 1,613 sf. DRP: A DRP is required for a structure that exceeds Proposed First Floor Garaqe 485 sf. 60% of the maximum allowable floor area and a Subtotal: 3,811 sf. second story that exceeds 40% of the first floor.

Required Parkin!=! Exemption: - 400 sf. SDP: A SOP is required for a new structure that Total Floor Area: 3,411 sf. exceeds 16 feet in height from the existing grade.

Proposed Grading: 30 CY of cut and 80 CY of fill, 5 CY of excavation for footings, 100 CY of removal and recompaction, an aggregate of 215 CY of grading, and 50 CY of import Proposed Parking: Attached 2-Car Garage Existing Development:

Proposed Fences and Walls: Yes Single-story, single-family residence with an Proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit: Yes; not attached garage to be demolished subject to discretionary review
Proposed Accessory Structure: No
November 10, 2021
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 3 of 12 ends

Development Review Permit Compliance (SBMC Section 17.68.40):

The following is a discussion of the findings for a DRP as each applies to the proposed project as well as references to recommended conditions of approval contained in Resolution 2021-128. The Council may approve, or conditionally approve, a DRP only if all of the findings listed below can be made:

1. The proposed development is consistent with the general plan and all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance including special regulations, overlay zones, and specific plans.

2. The proposed development complies with the development review criteria.

3. All required permits and approvals issued by the city, including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

4. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicants obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

If the above findings cannot be made, the Council shall deny the DRP.

In addition to meeting zoning requirements, the project must also be found in compliance with development review criteria. The following is a discussion of the applicable development review criteria as they relate to the proposed project.

Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses:

The property is located within the MR Zone. The surrounding neighborhood is also located in the MR Zone and consists of a mix of properties that are one- and two-story, single-family residences. The project site is currently developed with a single-story, single-family residence with an attached garage.

The project, as designed, is consistent with the permitted uses for the MR Zone as described in SBMC Sections 17.20.010 and 17.12.020, which permits one single-family residence and one Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) per lot. The property is designated Medium Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for single- and multi-family residential development with a maximum density of five to seven dwelling units per acre.

The proposed development could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

November 10, 2021
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 4 of 12 ends

The property is not located within any of the City's Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the SROZ and within the Coastal Zone. The project has been evaluated, and could be found to be in conformance with, the regulations of the SROZ. As a condition of project approval, the Applicants would be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of Building or Grading Permits.

Building and Structure Placement:

The Applicants are proposing to construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage. The location of the existing driveway would be maintained along the western side of the property with access from Ocean Street to the proposed 485 square-foot two-car garage. A screened trash enclosure would be located on the west side of the driveway. A gated walkway would provide pedestrian access from Ocean Street through the center of the property to the main entrance. The southern portion of the front yard would include an uncovered patio and a vegetated biofiltration area to support onside drainage. Private walkways would be provided along both the western and eastern sides of the residence to access the rear yard.

The replacement residence would be located in the western portion of the buildable area with portions of the second floor stepped back from the eastern side of the property by varying dimensions. The 1,713 square-foot first floor living area would include an openconcept kitchen, living, and dining room, an office (bedroom) with a private bathroom, a pantry, a powder room, and a utility room with access to the garage. The first floor would open to both an uncovered courtyard, a covered patio , and the rear yard. The 1,613 square-foot second floor living area would include a main bedroom suite with a partially covered deck located on the north (front) side of the residence and two bedrooms with private bathrooms and decks on the south (rear) side of the residence. The deck located off of Bedroom #2 on the southeastern side of the residence would be covered and also have access from the internal hallway. The deck located off of Bedroom #1 on the southwestern side of the residence would be uncovered. All proposed exterior areas, including the courtyard, patio, and decks would be exempt from floor area.

Exterior improvements proposed on the south (rear) side of the residence include a barbeque counter and bar seating, a pool and spa, and landscape and hardscape areas.

The Applicants are also proposing a detached single-story ADU of 450 square feet located in the southwest corner of the property and partially within the rear yard setback.

It should be noted that the detached ADU is not subject to discretionary review, pursuant to SBMC Section 17.20.040(0), and has been shown voluntarily on the project plans. The surrounding yard improvements, however, would be accessible by the tenants of both the ADU and primary residence and, therefore, are subject to the discretionary review.

The total proposed floor area would be 3,411 square feet, which is 2 square feet below the maximum allowable floor area for the 8,360 square-foot lot. The maximum floor area calculation for this project is as follows:

0.500 for first 6,000 112

0.175 for 6 001 to 15 000 ft2
Total Allowable Floor Area:

No\@mber10.2021
ORP21-0041SOP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 5 of 12 ends

3,000 SF
413 SF
3,413 SF
The proposed project, as designed, would meet the minimum required setbacks, provide the required off-street parking, and would be belowthe maximum allowable floor area for the property.

Neighborhood Comparison:

Staff compared the proposed project to 27 other properties wthin the surrounding area.

This area includes properties along PacWic Avenue, Ocean Street and Circle Drive as shown on the following map:
\ ... \
\
I
The properties evaluated in this comparison are located in the MR Zone. The existing homes range in size from 561 square feet to 5,000 square feet, according to the County Assessor records. It should be noted that the County Assessor does not include the garage, covered patio area, or accessory building area in the total square footage.

However, the County Assessor does include finished basements, which the City does not. Accordingly, the building area of the proposed project has been calculated for comparison purposes try deleting the area of the existing and proposed garages as follows:

Project Gross Building Area:

Delete Garage:

Project Area for Comparison to Assesror's Data:
3,811 SF
- 485 SF
3,326 SF
November 10, 2021
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 6 of 12 ends

Table 2 (on the following page) is based upon the County Assessor's data and SanGIS data. It contains neighboring lot sizes, the square footage of existing development, and the maximum allowable square footage for potential development on each lot.

Table 2
Lot Size in Existing ft2 Proposed / Max. # Property Address ft2 Onsite Recently Allowable ft2 Zone (GIS) (Assessor's) Approved ft2
1 620 E CIRCLE DR 8,000 1,602 3,350 MR
2 604 E CIRCLE DR 6,500 1,498 3,088 MR
3 616 W CIRCLE DR 14,900 2,409 4,558 MR
4 606 W CIRCLE DR 7,100 2,924 3,193 MR
5 230 OCEAN ST 7,100 3,161 3,193 MR
6 222 OCEAN ST 6,700 3,141 3,123 MR
7 216 OCEAN ST 5,800 4,0891 2,900 MR
8 212 OCEAN ST 6,600 1,452 3,105 MR
9 202 OCEAN ST 10,900 2,016 3,858 MR
10 615 E CIRCLE DR 12,000 2,913 4,050 MR
11 528 PACIFIC AVE 5,963 2,647 2,982 MR
12 524 PACIFIC AVE 6,800 4,8972 3,140 MR
13 520 PACIFIC AVE 6,800 4,4812 3,140 MR
14 223 OCEAN ST 12,679 4,036 4,169 MR
15 211 OCEAN ST 8,300 1,259 3,326 3,403 MR
16 201 OCEAN ST 6,600 1,897 3,217 3,105 MR
17 527 N ACACIA AVE 6,700 884 3,123 MR
18 523 N ACACIA AVE 6,750 1,016 3,131 MR
19 519 N ACACIA AVE 6,400 2,145 3,070 MR
20 515 N ACACIA AVE 6,200 3,866 3,035 MR
21 510 PACIFIC AVE 6,600 2,447 3,105 MR
22 512 PACIFIC AVE 6,700 1,414 3,123 MR
23 514 PACIFIC AVE 6,600 1,542 3,105 MR
24 516 PACIFIC AVE 6,700 1,827 3,123 MR
25 199 OCEAN ST 6,700 2,733 3,123 MR
26 514 N ACACIA AVE 5,000 3,0462 2,500 MR
27 516 N ACACIA AVE 4,900 1,230 2,450 MR
28 518 N ACACIA AVE 4,900 2,730 2,450 MR
1 This structure exceeds the maximum allowable floor area for the lot because the square footage provided by the Assessor includes a basement, which is exempted in the City's maximum floor area calculation.
2 These structures exceed the maximum allowable floor area for the lot because they were constructed prior to the adoption of the SROZ, which reduced the maximum allowable floor area.

Fences, Walls and Retaining Walls:

November 10, 2021
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 7 of 12 ends

Within the front yard setback area, SBMC Section 17.20.040(0) allows fences and walls, or any combination thereof, to be no higher than 42 inches in height as measured from existing grade, except for an additional two feet of fence that is at least 80% open to light.

However, one walkway feature up to a maximum height of 6 feet provided 50% of the area is open to light and air and one driveway architectural feature up to a maximum height of 1 O feet provided at least 50% of the area is open to light and air are permitted for each lot. Fences, walls and retaining walls located within the rear and interior side yards are allowed to be up to six feet in height with an additional 2 feet that is 50% open to light and air.

Existing perimeter retaining walls and fencing along the east and west property lines would be maintained with the project. New fencing and gates would be constructed to secure access to the rear yard. An existing perimeter wall adjacent to the sidewalk along the property frontage ranges in height from approximately 3 feet at the eastern property line to 3 inches at the western property line and is located within the public right-of-way.

It will be removed and relocated to the front property line with construction of this project.

Currently, the plans show existing fences and walls to remain and proposed walls that comply with the requirements of SBMC 17 .20.040(0) and 17.60.070(C). If the Applicants decide to modify any of the proposed fences and walls or construct additional fences and walls on the project site, a condition of project approval indicates that they would be required to be in compliance with the Municipal Code.

Landscape:

The project is subject to the current water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter 17.56. A Landscape Documentation Package is required for new development projects with an aggregate landscape equal to or greater than 500 square feet requiring a building permit, plan check or development review. The Applicants provided a conceptual landscape plan that has been reviewed by the City's third-party landscape architect, who has recommended approval. The Applicants will be required to submit a detailed construction landscape plan that will be reviewed by the City's third-party landscape architect for substantial conformance with the conceptual plan and compliance with SBMC Chapter 17.56. In addition, the City's third-party landscape architect will perform an inspection during the construction phase of the project. A separate condition has been added to require that native or drought-tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water-conserving irrigation systems are required to be incorporated into the landscaping to the extent feasible.

Parking:

SBMC Section 17.52.040 and the Off-Street Parking Design Manual (OSPDM) require two (2) parking spaces for a single-family residence. ADU's are not required to provide an additional parking space if the site is located within one-half mile of a transit stop. The subject site is within one-half mile of multiple bus stops on Highway 101 ; therefore, an November 10, 2021
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 8 of 12 ends

additional parking space is not required. The Applicants are proposing to construct a 485 square-foot attached garage in the northwest corner of the proposed residence. The garage would be accessed by a driveway on the northwest corner of the property from Ocean Street. SBMC Section 17.08.030 indicates that required parking up to 200 square feet per parking space provided in a garage is exempt from the floor area calculation. The proposed garage will provide two 9-foot by 19-foot parking spaces that are clear of obstruction. Therefore, 400 square feet of garage area is exempt from the project's total floor area calculation.

Grading:

Lighting:

A condition of project approval is that all new exterior lighting fixtures comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.

Usable Open Space:

Structure Development Permit Compliance:

The proposed structure exceeds 16 feet in height above the existing grade, therefore, the project must comply with all of the View Assessment requirements of SBMC Chapter

17.63 and the Applicants were required to complete the SOP process. The Story Pole Height Certification was certified by a licensed land surveyor on June 18, 2021, showing a maximum building height of 25.00 feet (100.75 feet above MSL) above the proposed grade. Notices were mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site establishing a deadline to file for View Assessment by August 12, 2021. The City received one application for View Assessment (Attachment 3) from the property owner (Asli Carome c/o Julie Hamilton, Law Office of Julie Hamilton; "Claimant") of 201 Ocean Street, which is located immediately east of the subject property.

The project was presented to the View Assessment Commission (VAC) on October 19, 2021 , and the VAC made a unanimous recommendation of approval with conditions. The notice of recommendation is provided in Attachment 4. The recommended conditions November 10, 2021
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 9 of 12 ends

included reduction in height of the proposed chimney by 9 feet (14 feet above grade) and reduction of the vertical height up from the sill of the east-facing window above the main bedroom bathtub to 2 feet, 4 inches.

The Applicants have included the VAC's recommended conditions of approval in the project plans provided in Attachment 2. An additional change provided by the Applicants since the VAC hearing is a 12-15 foot tall hedge (Pittosporum "Silver Sheen") located along the eastern side of the proposed second-floor covered deck in an effort to address privacy concerns raised by the Claimant. The story pole string lines between poles 16 and 17 were lowered after the VAC hearing to reflect the reduction in chimney height. The change was within the envelope of the originally noticed story poles, therefore, a second noticing period was not required.

Following the VAC hearing, the Claimant's representative indicated disagreement with the VAC's recommendation and requested that the City Council consider the View Claim.

The City Council should consider the recommendation from VAC, the information provided by the Applicants and Claimant, and the View Assessment Ordinance (SBMC

17.63) including the definition of a "Viewing Area" and the five required findings, which are provided below:

SBMC Section 17.63.020(1): "Viewing area" shall be that area of the structure (excluding bathrooms, hallways, garages or closets) or lot (excluding the building setback areas) where the view assessment committee, or the city council on appeal, determines the best and most important view exists. The finished floor elevation of any viewing area must be at or above existing grade adjacent to the exterior wall of the part of the building nearest to that viewing area. The determination shall be made by balancing the nature of the view to be protected and the importance of the area of the structure or lot from where the view is taken.

SBMC Section 17.63.040(F): Findings. In making a decision on a matter for which view assessment has been requested, the view assessment committee shall be required to make the following findings:

1. The applicant for the structure development permit has made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the person(s) requesting view assessment. Written evidence of a good faith voluntary offer to meet and discuss view issues, or of a good faith voluntary offer to submit the matter to mediation, is hereby deemed to be a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues.

2. The proposed structure does not significantly impair a view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bike ways, walkways, equestrian trails) which has been identified in the city's general plan, local coastal program, or city designated viewing areas.

November 10, 2021
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 10 of 12 ends

3. The structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

4. There is no signiffcant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application. Cumulative view impairment shall be determined by: (a) Considering the amount of view impairment caused by the proposed structure; and (b) considering the amount of view impairment that would be caused by the construction on other parcels of structures similar to the proposed structure.

5. The proposed structure is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

A condition of approval has been added to the Draft Resolution of Approval (Attachment 1) to require that the Applicants submit a height certification prepared by a licensed land surveyor prior to the framing inspection certifying that the maximum height of the proposed addition will not exceed 25.00 feet above the proposed grade or 100.75 feet above MSL, which is the maximum proposed structure height reflected on the project plans.

The Draft Resolution of Approval (Attachment 1) reflects the Claimant's request that the City Council consider the findings of the SOP in addition to the DRP. The Draft Resolution of Approval includes the applicable SBMC sections in italicized text and the recommended conditions of approval from the Community Development, Engineering, and Fire Departments. An additional condition of approval requires that the Applicants obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of Building or Grading Permits. The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the public hearing process. If the Council determines the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.

Property Frontage and Public Right-of-Way Improvements
The existing property frontage is improved with concrete curb, gutter and four-foot wide sidewalk. At the back of the sidewalk is a low concrete wall that decreases in height from approximately 3 feet in height at the eastern property line to approximately 3 inches in height at the western property line. If approved, the Applicants will be required to remove the existing wall and construct a 6-foot wide Decomposed Granite (DG) pathway graded at 2 percent slope. The driveway approach will also be reconstructed as a condition of approval to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards.

In conclusion, the proposed project, as conditioned, could be found to be consistent with the Zoning regulations and the General Plan. The City Council should consider the findings to approve or deny the SOP and DRP.

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:

November 10, 2021
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 11 of 12 ends

Notice of the City Council Public Hearing for the project was published in the Union Tribune more than 10 days prior to the public hearing. The same public notice was mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project site on October 28, 2021 . As of the date of preparation of this Staff Report, Staff has not received any additional correspondence from neighbors or interested parties in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed project except for the referenced correspondence from the Claimant.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Examples of this exemption include one single-family residence or second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three-single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
• Approve the project as recommended by the VAC and adopt the attached Resolution 2021-128.
• Approve the project subject to additional specific conditions necessary for the City Council to make all required findings for the approval of a SOP and DRP, including a different determination regarding the VAC recommendation. • Deny the project if all required findings for the DRP and SOP cannot be made.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

To clarify the intent of the VA C's recommended condition of approval to preserve privacy from the east-facing window, Staff would recommend that the City Council consider the following special condition language should the project be approved:

The east-facing windows located in the bathroom of the main bedroom shall have a minimum sill height of 4.5 feet.

The proposed project meets the minimum objective requirements under the SBMC, may be found to be consistent with the General Plan and may be found , as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings required as discussed in this report to approve a DRP and SOP. Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council:

November 10, 2021
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely
211 Ocean Street

Page 12 of 12 ends

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2021-128 conditionally approving a DRP and SOP to demolish a singlefamily residence, construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 211 Ocean Street, Solana Beach.

CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.

Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2021-128

2. Project Plans Dated 10-26-2021

3. Carome Application for View Assessment

4. NOR from October 19, 2021 VAC Meeting
RESOLUTION 2021-128

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLANA

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT AND STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

PERMIT TO DEMOLISH A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE, CONSTRUCT

A REPLACEMENT TWO-STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH

AN ATTACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE, AND PERFORM ASSOCIATED
SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT 211 OCEAN STREET, SOLANA BEACH
APPLICANTS: FORD AND CASSIE BLAKELY
APPLICATION: DRP21-004/SDP21-004
WHEREAS, Ford and Cassie Blakely (hereinafter referred to as "Applicants"), have submitted an application for a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SOP) pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and
WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on November 10, 2021, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found the application request exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

I. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

II. That the request for a DRP and SOP to demolish a single-family residence, construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached twocar garage, and perform associated site improvements at 211 Ocean Street, Solana Beach, is conditionally approved based upon the following Findings and subject to the following Conditions:

Ill. FINDINGS
A. The proposed structure exceeds 16 feet in height above the existing grade, therefore, the project must comply with all of the View Assessment requirements of SBMC Chapter 17.63 and the Applicant was required to ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 2 of 15 ends

complete the SDP process. The Story Pole Height Certification was certified by a licensed land surveyor on June 18, 2021 showing a maximum building height of 25.00 feet (100.75 MSL) above the existing grade. Notices were mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site establishing a deadline to file for View Assessment by August 12, 2021. The City received one application for View Assessment from the property owner (Asli Carome c/o Julie Hamilton, Law Office of Julie Hamilton; "Claimant") of 201 Ocean Street, which is located immediately east of the subject property.

The Applicants reflected the recommended conditions of approval in the project plans presented to the City Council on November 10, 2021 . An additional change provided by the Applicants since the VAC hearing was a 12-15 foot tall hedge (Pittosporum "Silver Sheen") located along the eastern side of the proposed second-floor covered deck in an effort to address privacy concerns raised by the Claimant. The story pole string lines between poles 16 and 17 were lowered after the VAC hearing to reflect the reduction in chimney height. The change was within the envelope of the originally noticed story poles, therefore, a second noticing period was not required.

Following the VAC hearing, the Claimant's representative indicated disagreement with the VAC's recommendation and requested that the City Council consider the View Claim.

In accordance with Chapter 17.63 (Structure Development Permit) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

Written accounts and oral testimony at the public meeting showed that there had been communication between the Applicants and the Claimant.

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 3 of 15 ends

II. The proposed structure does not significantly impair a view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bike ways, walkways, equestrian trails) which has been identified in the city's general plan, local coastal program, or city designated viewing areas.

The subject property is not located within designated public viewing areas; therefore, the proposed structure does not significantly impair views from public property.

Ill. The structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

The Claimant's primary view is toward the northeast. The proposed structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

V. The proposed structure is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

The proposed development is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character, including design, bulk, scale, height, and size.

B. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permit) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

I. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of SBMC Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance), including special regulations, overlay zones and specific plans.

General Plan Consistency: The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential, which allows for a maximum of five to seven dwelling units per acre. The development is also consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 4 of 15 ends

Zoning Ordinance Consistency: The project is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) (SBMC 17.20.030 and

The project is consistent with the provisions for minimum yard dimensions (i.e., setbacks) and the maximum allowable Floor area (FAR), maximum building height, and parking requirements.

II. The proposed development complies with the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section

The project, as designed, is consistent with the permitted uses for the MR Zone as described in SBMC Sections 17.20.010 and

17.12.020, which permits one single-family residence and one Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) per lot. The property is
designated Medium Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for single- and multi-family residential development with a maximum density of five to seven dwelling units per acre.

Page 5 of 15 ends

SROZ. As a condition of project approval, the Applicants shall obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of Building or Grading Permits.
b. Building and Structure Placement: Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhances their intended use.

The Applicants are proposing to construct a replacement twostory, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage.

A gated walkway will provide pedestrian access from Ocean Street through the center of the property to the main entrance.

The replacement residence will be located in the western portion of the buildable area with portions of the second floor stepped back from the eastern side of the property by varying
dimensions. The 1,713 square-foot first floor living area will include an open-concept kitchen, living, and dining room, an office (bedroom) with a private bathroom, a pantry, a powder room, and a utility room with access to the garage. The first floor will open to both an uncovered courtyard, a covered patio, and the rear yard. The 1,613 square-foot second floor living area will include a main bedroom suite with a partially covered deck located on the north (front) side of the residence and two bedrooms with private bathrooms and decks on the south (rear) side of the residence. The deck located off of Bedroom #2 on the southeastern side of the residence will be covered and also have access from the internal hallway. The deck located off of Bedroom #1 on the southwestern side of the residence will be uncovered. All designed exterior areas, including the courtyard, patio, and decks are exempt from floor area.

Page 6 of 15 ends

ADU is not subject to discretionary review, pursuant to SBMC Section 17.20.040(0), and has been shown voluntarily on the project plans. The surrounding yard improvements, however, will be accessible by the tenants of both the ADU and primary residence and, therefore, are subject to the discretionary review.

0.500 for first 6,000 ft2

0.175 for 6,001 to 15,000 ft 2
Total Allowable Floor Area:
3,000 ft 2
413 ft 2
3,411 ft 2
The proposed project, as designed, would meet the minimum required setbacks, provide the required off-street parking, and would be below the maximum allowable floor area for the property.
c. Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area. Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.

The project is subject to the current water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter 17.56. A Landscape
Documentation Package is required for new development
projects with an aggregate landscape equal to or greater than 500 square feet requiring a building permit, plan check or development review. The Applicants provided a conceptual landscape plan that has been reviewed by the City's third-party landscape architect, who has recommended approval. The
Applicants will be required to submit a detailed construction landscape plan that will be reviewed by the City's third-party landscape architect for substantial conformance with the conceptual plan and compliance with SBMC Chapter 17.56. In addition, the City's third-party landscape architect will perform an inspection during the construction phase of the project. A separate condition has been added to require that native or drought-tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and waterconserving irrigation systems are required to be incorporated into the landscaping to the extent feasible.
d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas: Any development involving more than one building or structure shall provide common access roads and pedestrian walkways.

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 7 of 15 ends

SBMC Section 17.52.040 and the Off-Street Parking Design Manual (OSPDM) require two (2) parking spaces for a singlefamily residence. ADU's are not required to provide an additional parking space if the site is located within one-half mile of a transit stop. The subject site is within one-half mile of multiple bus stops on Highway 101; therefore, an additional parking space is not required. The Applicants are proposing to construct a 485 square-foot attached garage in the northwest corner of the proposed residence. The garage will be accessed by a driveway on the northwest corner of the property from Ocean Street.

SBMC Section 17.08.030 indicates that required parking up to 200 square feet per parking space provided in a garage is exempt from the floor area calculation. The proposed garage will provide two 9-foot by 19-foot parking spaces that are clear of obstruction. Therefore, 400 square feet of garage area is exempt from the project's total floor area calculation.
e. Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving operations in connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.

The project proposes grading in the amounts of 30 cubic yards of cut for footings, 80 cubic yards of fill, 5 cubic yards of excavation for footings, 100 cubic yards of removal and recompaction, for an aggregate of 215 cubic yards of grading, and 50 cubic yards of import in order to create an increased building pad and consistent grade throughout the yard areas and construct drainage improvements including a bio retention basin located in the northeast portion of the front yard.
f Lighting: Light fixtures for walkways, parking areas, driveways, and other facilities shall be provided in sufficient number and at proper locations to assure safe and convenient nighttime use.

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 8 of 15 ends

Ill. All required permits and approvals including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

All required permits, including a Structure Development Permit, are being processed concurrently with the Development Review Permit.

IV. If the development project a/so requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicant obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

The Applicants are required to obtain approval from the California Coastal Commission prior to issuance of Building and Grading Permits.

IV. CONDITIONS
Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicants shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

A. Community Development Department Conditions:

I. The Applicants shall pay required Fire Mitigation, Park Development, Public Use Facilities, and Public Facilities Impact Fees.

II. Building Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the architectural plans presented to the City Council on November 10, 2021, and located in the project file with a submittal date of October 26, 2021.

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 9 of 15 ends

Ill. Prior to requesting a framing inspection, the Applicants shall submit a height certificate prepared by a licensed land surveyor prior to the framing inspection certifying that the tallest point of the proposed residence will not exceed 25.00 feet above the proposed grade or 100.75 feet above the Mean Sea Level (MSL) in conformance with the plans as approved by the City Council on November 10, 2021.

IV. Any proposed onsite fences, walls and retaining walls and any proposed railing located on top, or any combination thereof, shall comply with applicable regulations of SBMC Section 17.20.040 and

17.60.070 (Fences and Walls).

VI. The Applicants shall provide a full Landscape Documentation Package in compliance with SBMC Chapter 17.56 and in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan included in the project plans presented to the City Council on November 10, 2021 prior to Building Permit issuance, which will be reviewed and inspected by the City's third party landscape professional.

VI I. Native or drought tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water conserving irrigation systems shall be incorporated into any proposed landscaping and compatible with the surrounding area to the extent feasible.

VIII. All new exterior lighting fixtures shall be in conformance with the Citywide lighting regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060).

All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.

IX. Construction vehicles shall be parked on the subject property at all times feasible . If construction activity prohibits parking on the subject property, the Applicants shall ensure construction vehicles are parked in such a way to allow sufficient vehicular access on the street and minimize impact to the surrounding neighbors.

XI. The east-facing windows located in the bathroom of the main bedroom Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 10 of 15 ends

shall have a minimum sill height of 4.5 feet.

B. Fire Department Conditions:

Ill. ADDRESS NUMBERS: STREET NUMBERS: Approved numbers
and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate additional locations as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from either direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background, and shall meet the following minimum standards as to size: 4" high with a ½" inch stroke width for residential buildings, 8" high with a ½" stroke for commercial and multi-family residential buildings, 12" high with a 1" stroke for industrial buildings. Additional numbers shall be required where deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear access doors, building corners, and entrances to commercial centers.

IV. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM-ONE AND TWO FAMILY
DWELLINGS: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system designed and installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Sprinklers shall be installed in the new residence and ADU.

V. CLASS "A" ROOF: All structures shall be provided with a Class "A" Roof covering to the satisfaction of the Solana Beach Fire Department.

C. Engineering Department Conditions:

Page 11 of 15 ends

shall be done to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the proposed project:
a. Construction of any damaged sidewalk panels or curb/gutter as directed by the City Inspector.
b. Construction of the sidewalk underdrain.
c. Widening of the existing four feet wide sidewalk to six feet wide sidewalk with appropriate transitional sections to match the proposed driveway to the west and the existing sidewalk to the east.
d. Construction of the SDRSD driveway approach with 2:1 transitions to the existing concrete sidewalk.
e. Construction of the concrete walkway from the proposed sidewalk to the front pedestrian gate.
f. Removal of the existing retaining walls.

Ill. The Applicants shall pay in full the one-time Sewer Capacity Fee of $4,500.00 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) prior to Building Permit issuance. The EDU assignment is determined by SBMC 14.08.060.

The proposed residential unit would increase the property's EDU assignment by 0.8 EDU. The cost the Applicants are responsible for is $3,600.00 prior to Building Permit Issuance (0.8 EDU multiplied by $4,500.00).

IV. All construction demolition materials shall be recycled according to the City's Construction and Demolition recycling program and an approved Waste Management Plan shall be submitted.

V. Construction fencing shall be located on the subject property unless the Applicants have obtained an Encroachment Permit in accordance with chapter 11.20 of the SBMC which allows otherwise.

Grading:

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 12 of 15 ends

All necessary measures shall be taken and implemented to assure slope stability, erosion control and soil integrity. The grading plan shall incorporate all recommendations contained in the soils report.
c. The Applicants shall provide a Drainage Report prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. This report shall address the design for detention basin and corresponding outflow system to ensure the rate of runoff for the proposed development is at or below that of pre-existing condition. All recommendations of this report shall be incorporated into the Preliminary Grading Plan. A detention basin easement(s) shall be recorded for maintenance of the detention basins by the property owner(s) in perpetuity, prior to Final Inspection of the Building Permit.
d. The Applicants shall show all retaining walls and drainage structures. Retaining walls shown on the grading plan shall conform to the San Diego Regional Standards or be designed by a licensed civil engineer. Engineering calculations for all designed walls with a surcharge and nonstandard walls shall be submitted at grading plan check. Retaining walls may not exceed the allowable height within the property line setback as determined by the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code.

Contact the Community Development department for further information.
e. The Applicants are responsible to protect the adjacent properties during construction. If any grading, construction activity, access or potential construction-related impacts are anticipated beyond the property lines, as determined by the City Engineer, the Applicants shall obtain a letter of permission from the adjoining property owners. All required letters of permission shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the Grading Permit.
f. The Applicants shall pay a grading plan check fee in accordance with the current Engineering Fee Schedule at initial Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 13 of 15 ends

grading plan submittal. Inspection fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the Grading Permit.
g. The Applicants shall obtain and submit grading security in a form prescribed by the City Engineer.
h. The Applicants shall obtain haul permit for import/ export of soil.

Sediment controls shall be used as a supplement to erosion prevention for keeping sediment on site.
k. The Applicants shall show all proposed on-site private drainage facilities intended to discharge water run-off. Elements of this design shall include a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis verifying the adequacy of the facilities and identify any easements or structures required to properly convey the drainage. The construction of drainage structures shall comply with the standards set forth by the San Diego Regional
Standard Drawings.

I. Post Construction Best Management Practices meeting City and RWQCB Order No. R9-2013-001 requirements shall be
implemented in the drainage design.
m. No increase in cross-lot drainage shall be allowed.
n. Prior to obtaining a Building Permit, submit a building pad certification statement from a soils engineer and an engineer or land surveyor licensed in Land Surveying per SBMC

15.40.230E.

Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 14 of 15 ends

o. The Applicants shall obtain the Grading Permit prior or concurrently to Building Permit issuance.

D. City Council Conditions:

VII. N/A
I. ENFORCEMENT
Pursuant to SBMC 17.72.120(8) failure to satisfy any and all of the abovementioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SBMC Chapters 1.1.6 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.

Ill. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
The Applicants shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicants of any claim, action , or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification.

In the event of such election, the Applicants shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicants regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the Applicants shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicants.

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the resolution is effective Resolution 2021-128
DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Carome - 211 Ocean St

Page 15 of 15 ends

upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 10th day of November, 2021, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmembers -
Councilmembers -
Councilmembers -
Councilmembers -
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney

LESA HEBNER, MAYOR
ATTEST:

ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk
' j
i
I
l ' , ,
"I =XIS:::~:::~ TO BE REMOVED
w
I

ING, CONC SIDEWALK
Y DAMAGED I BAOKEN NELS TO BE REPAIRED PEA SDASD G•7
I
I~
u
~
ING CURB.GUTTER
A.MAGED / BROKEN

OR GUTTER TO BE
ED PER SORSD G-2
l------
l
,-----""'-----
1 i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
...... -~.
~-~~~NC\E 'I,
722SN
. ' . '
I

75.8P.l)
-~~=-~--= l=c!L . I I
,.;;=or-~~
, 11
~~
1-J1~_
7S O&N \
t.•, ::.
1 1------------ CD SITE SECTION SCALE:1/8" = 1·-0··
~~u•
I
!
I
i
i
I
i
I FUTUl'i£ADU
LOT15
LOT17 LOT 18
I
Y. ~FF
I

EXISH'IG RETAINING WALL
E.l<IS-l"-i'.::. r o R:CMAlN OOWNSPO'JT (OS) TYP\
OU LD'r- ~ / CONC STEP?lNG STONE ,u SET IN GRAVEL
P.A. 7575
r~~SffiG

TO IE REMOVED
PROPOSED 2 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE F F7642
PAO75.75
l
II PA I
CQt,/C SQUARES \'II
JOINTS FILLED W:R'.JCK___,\
I
:::TJ[I] PA. - □ - --
/ !
76 0 EG
1 755 ~
COt1IC STEPPING STONE
SET INGRA.VEL

LINE OF SITE WALL RAISED BOND
f TO ~EMAIN BEAM BEHIND PCO.. \ -I . \ I
:OVrooc») COUNT~RS
I . '
I r,

GRAVEL PATHWAY
NEY/ POOl

UNE OF SITE WALL
00 9E REMOVED (TYP) "-
/ccESSORY
JJWE~L~ ~f4~ NIT
/ PAD 75.75
251'
I NEWSITEAETAINlfl.'GWALL / 4 / \ 7g1 rw TO AEPI.ACE EXISTING ~ ~~=l~=.~~~~~=o·_N ___ ,--,.Ne FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES 1. OBSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION •
Ex1!:;l1r,g Proposed
f$F I TotaffSFJ
Non-landscaoed Area• S,683
Non-1 nv,ated Landscaoe" 0
lrnQated Landscape 1,625
Water Featuresc 492
Oecoret1ve Hardsco oe11 560
Total Lot Area 8,360
A,eoofWor~
/SF)
1rrlnated Landscaoe 1.625
Water Featuresc 492
Decorative Hardscooe11 560
Aggregate Landscape Area• 2,677
PROPOSEDREsa:nc:::

VICINITY MAP
Al! roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width
during construction and maintained free and clear.
including the parking of vehicles. in accordance with
the Califomra Fire Code and the Solana Beach Fire
Department.
2 ADDRESS NU MBERS• STREET NUMBERS·
Approved numbers and/or addresses shall be placed
on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate
additional locations as to be plainly visible and legible fr!Jm the street or roadway fronting the property from
either direction of approach. Said numbers shall
contrast with their background, and shall meet the
following minimum standards as to size 4" high with
a 1/2 " stroke for residential buildings, 8" high with a ¼'' stroke for commercial and multi-residential buildings, 12" high with a 1" stroke for induslnal
buildings Additional numbers shall be required where
deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear
access doors, building corners, and entrances to commercial centers. 3 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM• ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS• Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system
deSlgned and installed to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department. Plans for the automallc fire sprinkler
system shall be approved by the Fire Department
prior to mstallat1on

4. SMOKE DETECTORS/CARBON MONOXIDE
ALARMS/FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM; Smoke
detectors/ carbon monoxide alarms I fire sprinklers
shall be inspected by the Solana Beach Fire
Department

5. CLASS MA R ROOF: All Structures shall be provided
with a Class "A" Roof covering to the satisfaction of
the Solana Beach Fire Department
' l'l'Ol"[q-.u,,t------....., i
'~
I
i
\ --E
~IN
(TYPK;;AL)
P.A
CONC' SQUARES WI JOINTS'f;{..LEO W.flCX::K
S~~:~~~\OVE~' ,

PROJECT INFORMATION
APN• 263·042-05-00
SITE ADDRESS• 211 OCEAN STREET SOLANA BEACH, CA 9207S
LEGAL DESCRIPTION•
/
LOT7
LOT 14, IN BLOCK 3 OF SOLANA BEACH VISTA, IN THE

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE
OF CA., ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL MAP THEREOF NO.
2143, FILED IN THE OFFIC OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY
RECORDER ON DECEMBER 17, 1928
ZONE• MRd

SPECIAL ZONE OVERLAY,
OCCUPANCY:

CONSTRUCTION TYPE:

SPRINKLERS•
EXISTING LOT USE•
PROPOSED USE•
LOT COVERAGE:

OFF STREET PARKING•
FRONT SETBACK•
SIDE SETBACK•
STREET SIDE SETBACK•

REAR SETBACK,
MAX BLDG HEIGHT•
PROPOSED BLDG HGT•
LOT AREA•
LOT AREA•
GROSS
NET
Seated Residential Overlay
R-3 / U·l
ve
NFPA 13D SPRINKLERS REQ.

EXISTING SFR
SINGLE F AM!LY RESIDENCE
N/ A
2 SPACES REQUIRED
20'-0" (ROW SS'-0")
S'-0"
10'-0"
25'-0"
25'-0"
24'-10"
8,360 SF
8,360 SF
FLOOR TO AREA RATIO ALLOWABLE•
a.so x 6,000.

Q.175 X 2,360 •
Maximum Floor Area Allowed
PROPOSED BUILDING AREA•
3,000 s.f.
413 s.f.
3,413 s.f.

NEW FIRST FLOOR UVING AREA •
NEW SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA:

NEW GARAGE•
SU8TOT AL OF FLOOR AREA.
1,713 SF
1,613 SF
485 SF
3,810 SF
/
OFF STREET PARKING EXEMPTION (2 SPACES)

TOT AL PROPOSED FU)OR AREA
-400.0 SF
3,410 SF
DECKS•
COV. PATIO•
166 SF
478 SF
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 451 SF
PARKING•
2 PARKING SPACES IN GARAGE.
/
EARTHWORK QUANTITIES:

SITE GRADING•
30 CY· CUT)
80 CY- FILL)
ADU EARTHWORK QUANTITIES•
SITE GRADING:
5 CY- EXCAVATION FOOTINGS
100 CY- REMOVAL & RECOMPACTION
21 5 CY- TOTAL GRADING
50 CY- TOT AL IMPORT
OWNER/ APPLICANT•

FORD AND CASSIE BLAKELY
211 OCEAN STREET
SOLANA BEACH, CA 9207 5
858·2 1 3-6562
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE•

CRAIG FRIEHAUF
FRIEHAUF ARCHITECTS INC.
858.792.6116
[email protected]
S CY· CUT)
0 CY- FILL)
0 CY- EXCAVATION FOOTINGS
16 CY- REMOVAL & RECOMPACTION
21 CY- TOTAL GRADING
5 CY- TOTAL EXPORT

FRIEHAUF
@

ARCHITECTS
□
DATE:

MAR 18, 2021 MAY 6. 2021 JUNE 18, 2021 OCT 21 , 2021
SHEET NO.
5 0
CLS#1625
ENCUMBRANCES:

EXISTING ENCUMBRANCES LISTED BELOW ARE PER A PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY TITLE 365 DATED JULY 24, 2015 AS ORDER NO 410-1402082-.0.

COVENANTS, CONDlllONS, AND RESTRICTIONS AS SET FORTH IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 7, 1941 IN BOCK 1163 AND PAGE 209, Of OfFICIAL RECORDS, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANT, CONDlllON OR RESTRICTION, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE. COLOR RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STAl\JS , OR NATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT THE COVENANT, CONDlllON OR RESTRICTION (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER TITLE 42 Of 11-IE UNITED STATES CODE, OR (B) RELATES TO HANDICAP, BUT DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST HANDICAPPED PERSONS.

SAID COVENANTS, CONOlllONS ANO RESTRICTIONS PROVIDE THAT A VIOLATION

THEREOF SHALL NOT DEFEAT OR RENDER INVALID THE LIEN OF ANY MORTGAGE OR DEED Of TRUST MADE IN GOOD FAITH ANO FOR VALUE.

AN EASEMENT FOR RIGHT Of WAY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCU'-!ENT RECORDED IN BOCK 2357 Of DEEDS. PAGE 207.

SAID EASEMENT ROUTE ADJACIENT TO EASTERLY LINE Of LOT 14. NO EASE"4ENT LIMITS PR0"1DEO.

I
\ \

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
\
\
l!.@!l''lllll
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
1!.@!1'11<1!
~ s
MJ!l 00@. !11~
1!.@!1''113
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
ll.lQ/ll''IJIS \
\ \r~l:I:
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
IJJIW'II?
\
\
\
\ l!.@!l''ill \
\
\
\
\
OWNER:

FORD AND CASSIE BLAKELY
ADDRESS:
211 OCEAN STREET
SOI.ANA BEACH, CA
APN:
263-042-05
BENCHMARK.:

3.5" DIAMETER NATIONAL GEODEOJC SURVEY DISC
MARKED "J1415, 1987" LOCATED IN THE TOP OF
THE HEADWALL THAT JS 0.2 MILES NORTH OF
SOI.ANA "1STA DRIVE ON TliE EAST SIDE OF NORTliBOUND HIGHWAY 1D1, 3 FIT OFF OF THE SHOULDER ACCORDING TO TliE CITY OF SOLANA
BEACH SURVEY CONTROL RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 18971.

ELEVATION = 34.67D'
DAl\JM = NA\ID 88
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

LOT 14, IN BLOCK .3 OF SOLANA BEACH "1STA, IN

THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO, STA TE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OfFICIAL MAP THEREOF NO. 214.3, FJLED IN THE OfFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON DECEMBER 17, 1928.

NOTES:

1. BEARINGS ANO DISTANCES SHOl'rN HEREON ARE DERIVED FROM AN EI/IDENCE BASED BOUNDARY SURVEY PERFORMED ON JUNE 18, 2019.

2. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS SURVEY HAS NOT /OENTIFJED ANY
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES THAT MAY EXIST UNLESS OTHERll!SE
SHOl'rN.

3. TREES THAT ARE LESS THAN s• IN DIAMETER HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED, UNLESS OTHERl\!SE SH0\\!'-1.

LEGEND:

EC IND/CA TES EDGE OF CONCRETE

EP IND/CA TES EDGE OF PAVEMENT
m IND/CA TES FlNISHED FLOOR ELEVATION

FL IND/CA TES FLOW UNE

FS IND/CA TES FJNISHED SURF ACE

G IND/CA TES GROUND

TW IND/CA TES TOP OF WALL
WALL
SEWER MAIN ---s------

OVER HEAD LINE

CHAIN UNK FENCE

WOOD FENCE
METER

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

POWER POLE
PREPARED BY: COASTAL LAND SOLUTIONS, INC. 577 SECOND STREET ENCINITAS, CA 92024 760-230-6025 DA TE OF SURVEY: JUNE-JULY 2019
7-17-2019
DATE
Ill
®
I
I
I
FIRST FLR PLAN SCALE'1/8" "' 1•-0~
I
I
I
SECON(? FLR PLAN SCALE:1/8" = 1 -0
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
/
/
/
I
/
I
I
I
"'=' "'') / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
@

RRGHITECTS
□
SHEET NO.
~
GA~AGEAREA-·
4€5Jsqft
2nd Floor AREA SCALE:1/8" = 1 ·O
STAIR SECTION SCALE 1/8" "' 1 .Q
@

ARCHITECTS
□
DATE:

SHEET NO.
8 ''lJTIJRf:AfJ/.J
SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE.1/Sw - 1 '-0"
SOUTH ELEVATION - STORY POLE SCALE:118" - 1'-0~

EAST ELEVATION
i v"C~~-~a:
i
!
EAST ELEVATION - STORY POLE SCALE 118" ::: 1'·0"

NORTH ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION SCALE. lW "' 1',-0"

NORTH ELEVATION - STORY POLE
WEST ELEVATION - STORY POLE SCALE. 1/8~ = 1'-0"
ra

RRCHITECTS
□
DATE:

MAR i8, 2021 MAY6, 2021
JUNE 18, 2021 OCT 21, 2021
SHEET NO.

Roof Plan SCALE·1f8" "' 1'-0~
STORY POLE PLAN SCA! .. .E 118P = 1'-0"
/
/ :c'i; / "'7i
7 /
@

ARCHITECTS
□
DATE:

MAR 18, 'i?N MAY6,2 O?l
JUNE 18, 202" OCT21.2 I
SHEET NO.
~
Gl:NERAL NOTES
I. N'l'R<NN.. Of THIS GRAD/HG Pl.AH DOES HCJT COI/ST11lJTc N'PR<NN. Of \£Rl1CAL OR HORIZONTN.

ALJGNIENT OF ANY PRJVAT£ RO>JJ SIIOllfl I/E1IEIH FOO PU8UC R<MD PURPOSES. 2. FIW,J.. APPROVN. OF mESE: GRADING PLANS IS SIJB,£CT ll) RNN. APPROVN. Of TH£ ASSOCIA lED IW'RO\DIENT PLANS IIIIERE iJ'P1.JCA8I.E. F>W,J.. CURil GRAD£ El£VATIONS .11,\Y REQU/11£ CHAHGES Ill mESE:

PWIS. J. II/PORT .11,\lrRIALS SHAU. BE LEG.</.LY OBTA/HED. ~- A SEPARAT£ PfJIIIIT FRO/,/ 1H£ arr EHCIH£E/I MIU. BE R£Q(JIR£!) FOR ANY MQ;K Ill TH£ PU8UC R/GIIT-Of-WAY.

S. ALL SlOPES 0\£11 1HR£E (J) FEET Ill HE/GHT SHAf.L BE LAIIOSCAP£D A/ID IRR1GA IE!),

6. 111£ COIITRAC700 SHAU. l£R1FY 111£ EXISTENCE A/ID 1.0CA1KlH OF ALL UTIU11£S B£F0R£ caJJENaNG lltVIK.

HOTlCE OF PROPOSED MQ1I( SHALL BE Gl\£11 ro Tl£ /00.OIIWG AG€Na£S:

UHOE1ICROOND S.A. (800)-227-2600
7, A Sat.S RfPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS R£Q(JIR£!) 8Y 111£ aTY OF SCUHA BEACH PRIOR ro /SSIJAHCE OF A GRADING PfRU/t
a APPROVN. OF J1i£Sc PLANS BY Tl£ arr ENGINEER DCB HOT AU'/HORIZE ANY MQ;K OR GRADING ro BE l'£RfOIIIED UHl1L Tl£ PROPERTY OIINf/1'5 P£Rl/lSSIOH HAS BEEH OBTAINED A/ID A VAUD GIIADING PfRUIT HAS BEEH ISSUED.

9. 111£ QTY ENGIIIEBl'S APPROVN. OF mESE: PLANS DOES HOT COIIS11llJT£ 1H£ BUii.DiNG OfflCIAL 'S APPROVI.J. OF ANY FOOH!M1KlH FOO S1RUCTIJR£S ll) BE PU.CED OIi 111£ AREA COl£R£D BY mESE: Pt.AH5. HO IIW\£R OF 111£ GRADING OIIDIIINIC£ REQU/REJIENTS COIIC£RNlHG - C0\£11 01£R EXl'A/151\IE sms IS MAOC OR UIPUED.
m ALL 0P£RA 1IONS COIIDUClED al 111£ PR£JI/SES, /NGWO/HG Tl£ WN111/J/G UP, REPNR. ARRJVI.J.. DEP>RTIJRE OR RfJNNIIIG OF 111UCKS. £AR1HUOYIHG EOU/PIIEJIT. CONS1RUC11(W EOUIPIIEJIT A/ID ANY OmER ASSOOAlE'D GIIADING ECMPIIENT SHALL BE UlolllE'D ro 111£ PfR100 8£TEN 7:00 c.m. AHO 6: 00 p.m. EAal 0A Y, IIOIIOAY THROUGH F11JDAY, A/ID HO £AR1HUOYIHG al GRADING OP£RATIONS SHALL BE COIIDUClE'D al 11£ PR9IIS£S al ~11/ROAYS, SUNDAYS M 1/Cll/MYS llll!IOVT 111£ llllJTml PfJIIIISSIOII OF 111£ QTY ENGIH£ER. 11, ALL IIAJOR Sl.OPES SHALL BE ROIJHDED 111ro EXISTING '/ERIWH ll) PR00UC£ A COIITOORfJJ lllA/1517KlH FRO/,/ CUT al F1I.L FACES ro 1/AllJRI.J. GRWNO A/ID ABUTTING CUT M F1I.L FACES.

12. 1/0TIIITIISTNIDIIIG 1H£ MIIIIIIUII STAIIONIDS SET FORTH Ill 111£ GIIADING ORDIHANC£. AHO 1/0TIIITHSTAIID/NG THE APPROVI.J. Of mESE: GRADING PWl5. THE PfJIIIIT/EE IS RESPOIIS/Bt£ FOR THE PRE',£H1K)H OF OA.ll,IG£ ro 111£ ADJACENT PROPfRTY. HO PERSON SHAU. £XC.\VAT£ al LA//0 so a.OSE ro 111£ PROPERTY LINE AS 7l) ENDAIIG£R ANY /o.Dx»IIIIG PU8UC STR£IT, SID£ll',W(, ALLEY, FUHCT10N OF ANY SEWAGE DISPOSI.J. SYSIDI, M ANY OmER PU8UC al PR1VAT£ PROPERTY IIITHOUT SUPPORTING A/ID PROlECTIIIG SUCH PROPERTY FRO/,/ SET1UNG. CRA00HG. EROS1011. SILTING SCOUR M OmER OAIIAGE IIHICH J.IIGHT RESULT FRO/,/ THE GRADING OCSCR/BED al THIS PW/. THE QTY MIU. IIOUJ THE PfJIIIITIEE R£SPOll5IBt£ FOR CORRECT10N al 11011-CJEDICA JED /11PRO\fl1£NTS IIHICH DA.ll,IGE ADJACENT PROPfRTY.

13. Sl.OPE RA!IOS: CUT 1:2 F1I.L 1:2 cur: JO er F1U., 80 er All'tXIT: 50 er (HOT£: A SEPARAT£ VALID PfJIIIIT I/UST EXJST FOR OFFSIT£ II/PORT OR EXl'ORT AREAS.) • THE OUAHT111ES ESTMIA.TED ABO',£ ARE FCR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOJW HOT BE USED FOR CQ'IS1RUCT10II BIDS. COIIIRACTORS AR£ R£SPOll5IBt£ FOR THEIR OliN ENITHIIQ<K QUANTITIES.

H. SP£al.J. CONDIT10NS: IF ANY ARCHAElOGICIL RESQUIICES ARE DISCOl£R£D al 111£ ST£ OF THIS GIIADING DUR1NG GIIADING OP£RAT10IIS. SUCH Cf'ERATIONS MIU. CEASE IIMIEDIATELY, AHO THE PfJIIIITIEE MIU. NOTIFY THE QTY EHCIH£E/I OF THE DISCOl£'RY, GRADING 0P£RA 1IONS MIU. HOT C0UU£HC£ I/Hilt 111£ PfJIIIITIEE HAS R£CEJ\£D 1111/Tml AUTHORITY FRO/,/ THE QTY ENGINEER ro 00 SO.

IS. ALL GRADIHG SHOIIN al THIS PU.II SHALL BE CCNPt£1ED AS A SIHGUU,R UNIT 111TH HO PRO\!SlON FOR PNITII.J. R£J£ASES. SIIIJULD IT BE AIITIOPAJED TIIAT A Pal110N OF THIS PRO.ECT BE COUPl.£TED SEPN!AIRY, A SEPARAT£ PWI A/ID PfJIIIIT APl'UCA1KlH SHALL BE SUBIJITJED FOR APPROVI.J..

16. 111£ COIIIRAC700 SHALL NOTIFY 111£ QTY OF SCUHA SD.CH 858.720.2470 24 I/OURS BEFORE GIIAD/1/G OP£RA1IONS BEGIN.

17. FINISHED GIIADING AHO PU.HT/HG SHAf.L BE ACCOUPUSHED al ALL Sl.OPES PRIOR ro OCTOBER 1, M IWED/ATELY 1/POO IXMP1.E110N OF ANY SlOPES GRADED B£TEN OCTOBER 1 A/ID APR1L 1. PRJ0R ro ANY PWITIHG. ALL LAIIOSCAPIIIG SHALL BE APPRO\£D 8Y TIIE PWIHIIIG DEPNITM£HT AT THE DE>£1.a'I.IENJ' RE'.1£11' STAGE, OR BY SEPNIAT£ I.AI/OCSAPE Pt.AH. ta AU. CH-91'£ HAUL ROUTES SHALL BE SUBIJITJED BY 111£ COlllllAC700 7l) THE QTY EHCIH£ER FOO APPROVI.J. 72 HOURS PRJOR ro THE BEGIIINIHG OF IIOOK.

19. 1/POO FIW,J.. IXMP1.E110N OF 1H£ IIOOK UNDER 11£ GRADIHG PfJIIIIT. BUT PRJOR 10 RNI.J. GIIAD/1/G APPROVI.J. AHO/OR F11/I.J. REI.EASE OF S£CURITY, All AS-GRADED CERTIFICI\T£ SHALL BE PROWJED STATING:
•THE GRADING UNDER PfJIIIIT Ho. SBGR-216 HAS BEEH l'£RfOIIIED Ill SUBSTAIIIIAL CONFORI.WICE IIITII THE APPROlfJJ GRADING PU.II OR AS SHOIIN al 111£ A TTAOIED AS-GRADED PWI". THIS STA T£llEIIT SHAf.L BE FOLLOllED BY THE DAT£ NID SIGtlA1URE Of THE Q\IL fJIGIIIEER IIHO CER11F1ES SUCH A GIIADIIIG Cf'ERATIO'I.

20. THE COIIIRAC700 SHALL DES1GN. CO'IS1RUCT. A/ID IIAJNTA/11 ALL SAFFTY OE,ICES IHCWDIIIG SHOR/HG. NID SHALL BE R£SPOll5IBt£ FOR CONFORMIHG ro ALL LOCAL. STAJE; AHO FED£RI.J. 5.'fl:TY A/ID HEI.J.TH STAI/DAROS, !.AIIS A/ID REGU!.ATIOtlS.

N('!EYJSOOC!llSl/iJ_/ =..:r:-1:,, t55'iP£!Wllf.DlfllS!.llSD(J; ----------PHI >-----:,er-------,
f---1s-j
!:ROS/ON CONTROL NOTES PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 1. STORJI ll'Aml NlD IIOH-STORJI 1111ml 0/SCIWIGE COHTROI.; BEST IINll&EJl£NT PRAC1ICE5 SIW.L BE DE'lfl.OP£D AHO IIIPLEllENT£D 10 -.;c STORJI 1111ml A/ID IIOH-STOR>I 1111ml DISCfW1GfS FROM TH£ SITE AT ALL T1UES DURING .EXCAVATION NiD GRADfHG ICTMT1£S.

2. EROSKJH NID SEDIWENT COHTROI.; EROSJOH PR£l£H110!I s;wL 8E EMPHASIZED AS 1H£ IIOST AIPtXITAHr IF...ASURE FOR KED'ING SEDIWENT OH SIT£ DUR1NG fl<CA\!ATIOH A/ID GRolDtNG AC1M1IES. S£Dlll£NT COH1ROLS SIW.L BE USED AS A SUPPf.£JJ£HT 10 ER0SKJH PR£l£H110!I FOIi K£EPINC S£Dlll£NT OIi SIT£.
.3. EROSKJH COll1ROL OH SlOFES SIW.L BE llmGAlE'D BY II/STALLING !..AIIDSCN'fNG AS PER APPROVED t.ANDSCAPE P(AIIS AS REQUtR£D BY 111£ DEVfl.OPIIOO' llO!£W COIIDITlOHS, OR BY lFJJPOfl)R>' EROSKJH COll1ROL COHfORll1HG 10 THE FOU.CWfllG:
~
20 50
8 6
L
91 b'QN-f?RfG.UfD H'(DROSffi} LltX' mZH A FiBfR taTRfX Jffl.ED AT 4 000 l.BIACR£ I PflRJJY/J,CRf" 70% PWS

SCNIIAED
50%PWS

ATR/PW(
~
G!.AUCA PI.AHTIIGf: IHS/JWlfS
EHCEl.lS FAR/1/0SA LOTUS SCOIWllllS EXCHSCHOLmt. CALIF.

4. TIIE TOPS OF ALL SI.OPES TALLER TIIAII 5' SIW.L BE DIKED OR TRENCHED ll) PR£l£HT ll'Aml FI.CWl1NG Ol£R CRESTS OF SI.OPES.

S. CATCH BASIHS, OESII.TIHG BASIHS, A/ID STORII DRJJ/1 SYST!llS s;wL BE II/STAI.LED 10 TIIE ~1/SFAC1KlH Of' TIIE arr ENGll/fIR.

6. SAA'll 8'11 CHECK !WIS, SILT FENCfS, FIBER ROl1.S OR OTli£R APPROVED BIIP'S SIW.L BE Pl,IC£D 111 UHPA\£D ARfAS lllTII GIW)lf}{TS III EXCESS OF 2X, AS ~ AS AT OR lll'NI El£RY POINT IIHERE CONCENT1/A1E'D FLU# LEAVE THE sm:.

7. SAA'll S1GS S1W.L BE Pl,IC£D OH 111£ UPSll1EAII SIDE Of' All. DRAJHAGE lNl£TS 7l) IIIHMIJZE SILT BUILDUP Ill THE llll.£TS AHO PffS.

8. 1H£ COll11IACTOR SHALL REPNR ANY ERODED SLDPfS AS DIR£ClED BY TIIE OFllCE Of' TIIE arr EHGlll£ER.

9. TIIE COll11IACTOR SIW.L 511W' RQ4DIIIIYS AHO EHW,HCES ll) NID FRO/,/ 1H£ SIT£ al A REGULIR BASIS ro KEEP 111£11 FREE OF SOIL ACCUW!.ATIO'I NII) AT ALL OTli£R llll£S DIR£ClED BY 1H£ arr EHGll/£ER.

10. 1H£ COll11IACTOR SIW.L 1111ml SIT£ OIi A COHT1NUOUS BASIS 70 IIIHMIJZE NII BORHE OUST CREAJED FRO/,/ Gf1ADIIIG A/ID IW.JUNG OPERATIOHS OR EXCESSNE WINO CONDiTIOH5. A/ID AT ALL TlllfS /J/R£CJED BY TIIE arr EHGll/£ER.

11. 111 THE EVENT SILT DOES fHTER 1H£ EX1SntlG PUBUC STOR>I DRAIN SYST£II, REllOVI.J. OF TIIE SILT FRO/,/ TIIE Tl£ SYSIDI WU. BE DOH£ AT TIIE DEV£UJPER'S EXPfJIS£.

BED/JING COURS£-2• THICK
Of' a• 70 j" (HO.B) AGGREG4T£
UIN. s• 1HICK 3,,-- 0f i• CRUSHED ROCK ~.\,""'r'o, _, _ SOIL 5UBGIWJE PAVER SECTION
HOT£: NOT TO SCALE
-AIL AGGREG4T£ l/UST BE CJDH/flASHED AHO FREE Of 1'111£5 (SNID. SILT, ETC.) -THE: PA\IEJ!S S1W.L HCJT BE SfJ,UJ) a/CE THE \O'D F1UEI ™5 BE£H ADDED -E:AC/1 COURS£ SIW.L BE Y/BRAroRY COIIPAClE'D BEFORE PUCnlENT OF I/EXT COURSE -HO IIIP£1MDUS UHER OR FU.ml FNJRJC IS 10 BE USED -SPECW. N'PR<NN. REQ(JIR£I) FOIi USE JI/ HIGHLY fXAWSNE SOIL - SWDRNN ~y BE REQUtR£D '*COHSll1UCOOH HOT£: -PA\IEJ!S 70 BE COl£R£D NID PROT£C1E'D DUR/HG COIISTRUCTJON '-EXISTIIG- 10 BE IBUfiJED

PROPOSED RESIDENCE
F.F. 76.42
PAD75.75
CURBOU11ET PERSDRSD/J.N
FL720
CL
PL
l[
Fr
FG
FS
FL OH XXX.X rgx.x)
BS
P.A.

TC
TG
TW
FYSB
RYSB
SYS8
Tll'CIFG
BWO<'"G
OS
1:XISTING CONDfiON
IIIP£1MDUS: 4,000 SF Pf.RV/OUS; 4,3/!0 SF
PROPOSl:D CONDITION
lllPE1MOUS: 4,M2 SF HAilDSCAP& 1,683 SF
BUIU1IHG: 2,208 SF N)j): -151 Pf.RV/OUS; 4,018 SF WIDSCAPE, 1,419 SF PfJMOUS: 1,889 SF P<XX: ~5 SF BIJP: 65 SF

TOP OF WALL

FINISHED GRADE
(1W@FG)
Pl.

TOPOF

WALL(TW)

TYPICAL WALL CROSS SECTION,

ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN
HrJTll) SCll£
·+-a· PA. I ~ oa
EX~
BASIN DETAIL 1/rJT TO SCll£
PRl:LIMINARY GRADING PLAN SCN.E: 1· • 10' 0 10
ENGINEER OF WORK CITY APPROVED CHANGES I APP'D DATE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL l-----------------------+,---,-------------1------------r---t---1 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION I_SEL y: ""'-o, OA•=n,,e, ___ t:===========+==+=~By, ------------ 1 DrawnBy R.~~'. ~ 7?~'!,N ARD~p'.Nb f--------------+--+-----1 o..., --___ _ By:--------------
Date: ___ _
VICINITY MAP NOT10SCN.E
SIJBDRAIN PfPE
SCALE, 1" = 10'
I 20 30

BENCHMARK
1W75.8
Ll:GAL DESCRIPTION LOT 14, Ill BUJCK 3 Of' saw.I IJE.IDI l'ISTA. 1H THE arr OF saw.I IJE.ID/, COUNTY Of' SAIi o,u;o, STAT£ OF ~ ACCORD/HG TO TIIE OfFICIN. 11N' mER£0F HO. 21"3, FILED 1H 1H£ OFllCE OF 1H£ SAIi o,u;o COUNTY RECORDER OH OECEllBER 17, 192a A.P.N.: 263-1>42-05
SITE ADDRl:SS :

OWNERIPl:RMITTEI::

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY :

WORK TO Bl: DONE:
21 1 ~ STREET
sow.I IJE.IDI, CA 92075
FORD NID CASSIE BW<£l.Y
211 OCENI STRf£f
sow.I IJE.IDI, CA 92075

COISTAL WID SDLUTJDNS
(760)230-6025
'tHt lllPR!MJlfN1S CONS/ST Of TII£ FOU.OW/NG ll'ORK ro BE DOH£ ACCORDIHG ro THESE PW/S A/ID Tl£ V.TEST £DITIOHS OF:

STANDARD SPl:C/FICATIONS
(1} STAll!WIO SPfX/FICATIOHS FDR PUBUC ll'OR1(S COIIS11IUC11DH /IICI.UIJIIIG TII£ IIEGIONoll. SUPPl.fMENfN. NENOM£HTS. (2) CAt.lFORHIA DEPNITM£HT Of TRAIISPORTATIOH 'IWIUIL Of' 1lWflC COH1ROLS FOR COIIS11IUCTION AHO AWN1E1IAIIC£ WORK ZOHES" (J) STAT£ Of' ~ DEPARTIIENr Of' TRAIISPORTATIOH STNIDIIID SP£ctl'lCATIO'IS

STANDARD DRAVVINGS
( 1) SAIi DIEGO IIEGIONoll. STNIDNID DRAWJHGS
(2) S);IT£ Of ~ DEPARTIIENr OF TRAIISPORTAT10N STAll!WIO PW/S LEGEND
~TIOH
Pl10l'f1ITI' UN£
CEN/ERUHE OF ROil/
PROFOSE1/ smw:KS
I: PROFOSED HIJ/DSCN'E PfR I..WJSCIPE NlC/1/TECT PUNS
PROFOSE1/ CONTOUR UN£ -----51----- EXISTING CONTOUR UN£ PROFOSE1/ ll,ISQ//KY REfM/11/C lll4l1. PfR PW/
EXISTII/Gll,ISQ//KYREJNIIII/Glll4ll.

PROFOSED llECOIIFOSED GIWli1t (D.G.)
PROFOSE1/ 4-INCH S10RII DRAIN

PROFOSED ROOF WIIN SPOUT
OWNl:R'S Cl:RTIFICATI:
-I
== == == a::: .
( -=-=-====== AS OIINfl1/0EVELOP Of' Tl£ PROP£RTY OCSCRJBED f/£RfJH J.CKHOWl£DGt mESE: PWiS ™\IE BEEN PREPARED AT llY DIREC110H ll1TII IIY ft/IL COi/SENT. I ft/lLY UNDERSTAl/0 AHO ACCEPT TIIE TERt.15 A/ID COIIDITlOHS COHl'AJ//£0 f/£RfJH A/ID AS ATTACHED BY REFER£NCE OIi TII/S GRADING Pl.AH. rr IS AGR£ED J'H.IT 001) COIIDITlOHS ~y REOUIRf: CIWIGES ro mESE: PWIS ~FURTl~l~ ==~ =~~rb"iii&~WIIICHCMLTHE
arr ENC1HEER DET£RIIIH£S ARE ll£CESSIRY A/ID DES1l1ABL£ FOR TIIE PROPER COlolPLETIOH Of'Tf£1UP11(M},/£1/'/ I FUl1TIIER AGRE£ ll) COIIIIE1ICE WORK OIi ANY lllPRO\IEIIENTS SHOWN al 71/ESE PW/S 'M1HIH EX/S11NG QTY RIGIIT-DF-IIIIY WITHIN 60 !llYS OF 1H£ CONS111UCTIOH PERMIT AHO ro PURSUE: SUCH WORK AC1Jl'EI.Y OIi El£RY HORM<L WORKING lllY UNTIL COlll'l£TED, IRRESPEC11\IE AHO II/DEPEHD£HT OF ANY OmER WORK ASSOC/AlID l'flTII THIS PROJ(CT OR UNDER llY COIITROL
FORD A/ID CASSIE BIM£L Y 211 OCENI S111E!'T
SOUJ.I IJE.IDI, CA 92075
Dl:CLARATION OF Rl:SPONSIBLE CHARGE
/, BRIA/I II. NIOOUNO, HEREBY DEC1.ARE J'H.IT I NJ TIIE ENC1HEER OF WORK FOR THIS PROJECT, J'H.IT I ™VE EXCERC/SED R£SPOHSIBI.£ CIWIG£ Ol£R TIIE 0ESJGH Of' TIIE PROJECT AS /JEF1H£D Ill SEC1KlH 6703 OF 1H£ 8USlHESS AHO PROF£SSIOIIS CODE. AHO THE DESIGII IS COHSISTENr wrTH CURR£Nr STAHCWIDS A/ID TIIE arr OF 50U.™ BEACH R£SOUJT/OH Ho. 2007-170.

I UNDERST,W! TH-IT TIIE CHECK Of' PROJECT DRAIIINGS NID SPECJflCATIOHS BY THE arr OF S01.,W. BEACH IS COHF1HEO ro A R£'.l£W OHLY A/ID DOES HCJT RE1JE\IE !IE Of RESPOHSIBIUTl£S FOR PROJ£CT DESIGI/.
/J'(-• ----------------
BRWi ARDOLJl/0 RC£ No. 71651 EXP 12/31/2021
PASCO !.ARET SUTIER .t: ASSOCIATES
ADU EARTHWORK QUANT/TIES : l:ARTHWORK QUANTITIES :

SIT£ GRADING:

CUT: 5 CY F1U., o er
fl<CAVAT10N FOR FOOTINGS: 0 CY
SIT£ GRADING (OUTSJD£ OF STRUC1UR£): CUT: .lD er
F1LL: BO CY
fl<CAVATIOH FOIi l'OOTINGS; 5 CY
REllOVN. ,t RECOIIPACTIOH (UNDER STRUCTURE): 16 CY REMOVI.J. ,t RECOIIPAC1KlH (UHOER STRUC1UR£): 100 CY TOTI.J. GRADING: 21 er rorAL GRAD/HG (CUT AHO F1I.L OUTSIDE ,t BEWW STIIUCllJR[) : 215 er roTJ.J. IIIPORT: 50 CY ll)TN. EXPORT: 5 CY
£NITHWORI( Q'..wmnES NIE ESTl1/AJED FDR PfJIIIIT PURPOSES OHLY A/ID REPRE:sEHT COIIPACT£D (Ill P!AC£) \OWi/ES OHLY. 71/ESE VALU£S ARE CALCV'..AlE'D OH A TH!:ORETICI.J. BASIS. AC1l/AL QUANT111£S ~y ~ OUE ro 08S£lr{f[) S/IR1IIY,,l,GE AND/OR sm.L FACTORS.

COASTAL COIII.IISSJON PERMIT HO.

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
211 OCEAN STREET
DRAWING NO.

DRP21-004
SDP21-004
SHEET l OF!
Pi.5A 3566
0 NORTH
SCALE 1/8" = 1'
~L■ 0 8 16
FEET
24 BIOFILTRATlON
AREA
DEC0\1POSED

GRANITE
PAOl/tDE HANDRAIL ---+-+-~
42" HIGH FENCE --tf--i)::;~t.,4!,;;:;;;jf8,;:~-,,-
CONCRETE OAl½;:WAY

APRON IN RIGHT-OF-WAY
I

LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING ,J
<f SPOTLIGHT UPUGHTING TREE
F~ol~~~,~~~u~~t'g~L;;m~~J;~~~OUND SPIKE)
◊ ~RNAA\tiftt_Lg;;E~~~0~TLE6X LUMINAIRE HC

PLANT LEGEND MATURE WATER

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION HEIGHT USE
0 ACCA (FEIJOA) SELLOWIANA • PINEAPPLE GUAVA 18'-25' LOW • AEONIUM 'SUNBURST· SUNBURST AEONIUM 2' LOW
• ALOE STRIATA • GHOST ALOE 2' LOW
@ CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM • CAPE RUSH 3' LOW
.,., DIANELLA 'LITTLE REV' 2' LOW
~ 2' LOW ® DIETES BICOLOR · FORTNIGHT LILY
© LIMONIUM PEREZII • STATICE 2' LOW
t,:t MUHLENBERG IA RIGENS · DEER GRASS 3' LOW
"' e RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'MINOR'· DWARF YEDDO 4' LOW s WESTRI NGIA 'GRAY BOX'· COAST ROSEMARY 2'-3' LOW
@ BOUGAINVILLEA BARBARA KARST 30' LOW

ESPALLIER ONTO WALL/FENCE
OLEA 'SWANN HILL' · FRUITLESS OLIVE 20'-35' LOW
FRUIT TREE · DWARF 8'-10' SLA

MEYER LEMON BEARRS LI ME

NAVEL ORANGE
(§) PITTOSPORUM 'SI LVER SHEEN' 12'·15' MOD
KOHUHU
MULCHED SHRUB AREA BARK OR ROCK MULCH · 3" DEPTH
BIOBASIN:

CAREX TUMILICOLA • BERKELEY SEDGE WITH REINFORCED RICE STRAW MATTING ON SIDES

PLANTING AND REINFORCED STRAW MATTING
SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL SIDE SLOPES OF THE BIO-BASIN.

MIN.

SIZE
5GAL.
1 GAL.
5GAL.
5GAL.
1 GAL.
5GAL.
1 GAL.
5GAL.
5 GAL.
5GAL.
5GAL.

TRASH ENCLOSURE
4' HIGH SOLID BOARD

FENCE AND GATES

QUANTITY
10 44
29 8
17 3
23 15
54 6
9 36" BOX MULTI
15GAL. 3
15GAL. 7
1 GAL. 16"O.C.
5' HIGH FENCE/>.ND GATE PER POOL BARRIER REQUIREMENT

CONCRETE STEPPING
STONES SET IN GRAI/EL OA OG i?ERMEABLE)
OSED 2 STOR Y

AMILY RESIDEN
CONCRETE STEP? ING

STONES SET IN
GRA\t'EL ORD G (PERMEP..BLE)
F.F 76.67 PAD 76.0
/

ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) WORKSHEET
The l'f'1UOCl'• l~Toul Wattt Use: is cakulatd uJin& the foU(minc fonnul:r· { PF , /IA ) Enl'U ={EToX0.62 ---+SL.A /£
ITTWI 1 • bathi,aicd kll:II \\oller u,c ~ r )1::ar {pUoa.s pa )"Qr) 8To • I ,~r,i1c,nr.atr ftnd,es JV)'e:Y)
Pl- • Plant r-ac10r from WUCOI {'KC Odinitions)
HA • H)dro-7.:0l'IC' Arc.t (1qWR' fN'I): Ddineh)(lro-7JMC!li b) • in.er 1$:'' '"Cf) ~-~-moden.1eand hi~ SI.A •Special l..armc:8rcAn2 l,;qu:wt:frct): F.dibkpP~irripled •ilh rcc)dcd w111n-.&. 1urfu'ted for 11C1i,cf1b)
Q.62 aCon\cnloohrraol"Oopllons-per~fooO
IF. • lm-...t..... Elilcic.nc\

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) WORKSHEET Line Hydro-zone Numbcr {1 - 4 Bolow - usc as many tables as neceUolN 10 .........,.....,.,e all hvdrozonesl
1 ~- 3 • SLA
EYapotr111spnnoo Rate (ETo) See ~ 1 u5'" <-st ot 1-5~ 7 <•••• or l-5J .... below Conversion Factor - .62 2 ..., ---062
(Line 1 ,c Lloe2) 3 ! 25 2 (west of 1-5): / 29 14 (east of 1-5) Plant Factor (PF) • 0.3 0.6 1.0 s.e·e' be«>w
Hydrozone Area (HA) - in square feet 5 1,361 35 492 264 (Line 4 x l ine 5) 6 408.3 21 492
lrrig3bon Effoency (IE) 7 0.81 0.81 1.00 See ·c· below
(Line 6 - Lone 7) 8 504 26 492
TOT AL of aU Uoe 8 boxes + SLA 9 1,286
Line 3 x Une 9
Esbmoted Tot.II Water Use · ETWU
(gallons per,...-) 10 32,690 gallons per year
Total shall not exceed MAWA bek>w
• I ,r_,...,.,,. _ _ ,,,:,..rc,,,_,,.,_M C LT-- 1.r.-,.•~,.,..• 11:- ,m~ r..J]kH--, -41 (\\'t"Mot I SJ ---11,e~.,_...,..,,.,_. .... __ .,, 17 (C3UOI 1-51 TIH'-,tK•-•u-rr ....... w...,._ ,ro,,v .. j(j _ ,...., _rF.,,.,,,,,.,,., ... ,.~. ll#l,lwr .. 71
,,,.,....,., ... ~-J 0r,, I. l.,__ 'f'N'I ., J!I
U.l•L1'1 La ll__,.LIIC'"l'Wi
,,,,.,,. ,~,-·-·~-· ~~:: -~ ~ :,:.,:- ".-,, . .-.wttWlf..,,,_..,"'.,.~ .. .....,..._, ,.._.,,,_,...r.,,.,,.._ MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER APPLICATION (MAWA-'J_c_a_lc_u_la_ti_o_n: ____ ~

25.42 l[ETAF x 2 152
2S~2or19 I~ TOQJ Ulntbeaf'IC"Arc:I
,\1AWA
) + ( I-ETAF ~o,/~1 )I = 33,107 gallons
F.l-:tpotr.1Mpira110,, ;lf.lj u~mcni facsor (H AF1 uf .~ i~ ~ ,-15 non- ~identml G'1
Drawn By

GRAVELORDG
(PERMEABLE)
/

CO'IICRETE SQUARES
WITH JOINTS Fill.ED

WITH GRAVEL ROCK
OR ARn:::1s1AL TURF (PERM E~BLE)

SWIMMING POOL

ACCESSORY
):lWELLING UNIT
# , <~: ~
FR -
.,

FRUITLESS OLIVE

HYDROZONES

SYMBOL ZONE
-:1 #1
112
#3
#4
L.'INDSC.-.PE ARCHITECT OF v\OOK

WATER AREA
VEG. TYPE USE PLANT FACTOR SO. FT. IRRIGATION TYPE IRRIGN. EFFIC.

TREES/SHRUBS LOW 0.3 1,361
SHRUBS MOD 0.6 35
POOL
CITRUS
TOTAL:

WATER FEATURE 1.0 492
SLA SLA 264
2,152

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CERTIFICATION
I am fa miliar with the requirements for landscape and irrigation plans contained in the City's water Efficient Landscape Regula tions.

I have prepared this plan in compliance whh those regulations and the Landscape Design Manual. I certify that the plan implements those regulations to provide efficient use of water.

C~ ,, M.0[W". ,012ot2·
GEOR MERCER RLA #4055 DATE
DRIP 0.81
DRIP 0.81
FILLER PIPE 1.00

DRIP SLA
LANDSCAP!: ARCHl~CTIJR! 990 S::ACOAST DRI\/E, STE 20
IMPERIAL BEACH CA 91932
(619) 682-2499
COASTAL COMMISSION PEAMli NO X-XX-XXXX-X GMA ;' 21-003

LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

BLAKELY RESIDENCE
211 OCEAN STREET
DRAWING NO.

SBGR-XXXL
SHEET 1 OF 1

APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSME T
(Structure Development Permit)
Project No.: DPR21- 04/SDP2 l-004

RECEIVED
AUG 11 2021
Community Development Dept.

City of Solana Bea

1. Address of prop rty for which the structure development permit has been requested:

2. Provide th ion for the individual filing this Application for Assessment:

Name: A of Julie M. Hamilton
Address: ch
PhoneN
Email: -JJ,l.ilS<l~wµ!lil.W=Ufl.Xl'...l,(.!.lllJ... · · ___ ___________________ _

3. Description of he viewing area as defined in Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance, Section 17 .63.020(D and extent of impainnent: Dining Room Master Bedroom Outdoor Living Acea

4. Identify the porti n of the proposed structure which is the most objectionable and suggestions to minimize the vie · airrnent: ~~~=~~~ ........ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-

5. Description ofth Claimants attempt(s) to resolve this issue with the owner/representative of the property for which a Structure Development Permit has been requested:...L.,U;l,c...Qj.LWJ.W.W..J.1.¥L.l.Ll'..~"4'-w.u.~.J.W,u.LL--..\L.L.Z...lW.l,.L~l,4...J..L~~...xu.u.w.L..LW!.\...l,J,jl,Lµ\J~~+U,l,~'1..I.I....L-- . ng.
on. I believe e time woul .

Cu.Id
Signature of App icant for Assessment Date Submitted
STAFF USE ONLY:

Application for Asse sment fee paid?
6-2019
ATTACHMENT 3
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH www.cityofsolanabeach.org
635 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101 ° SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 • (858) 720-2400 • Fax (858) 720-2455

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
View Assessment Commission Notice of Recommendation
Tuesday, October 19, 2021 - 6:00 P.M. Regular Mtg via Teleconference PROJECT CASE NO: DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely Residence
PROJECT LOCATION: 211 Ocean Street, Solana Beach
APPLICANTS: Ford and Cassie Blakely
REPRESENTATIVE: Craig Friehauf, Friehauf Architects
PRESENT VAC MEMBERS: Matt Cohen, Paul Bishop, Pat Coad, Robert Moldenhauer, Linda Najjar, and Robert Zajac
STAFF MEMBERS: Joseph Lim, Community Development Director, Katie Benson, Senior Planner; John Delmer, Junior Planner;
Elizabeth Mitchell, Assistant City Attorney
ABSENT: Frank Stribling (Recused)
ASSESSMENT FILED BY:

Name:

Address:

Asli Carome c/o Julie Hamilton, Law Office of Julie Hamilton 201 Ocean Street
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The Applicants are requesting the approval of a Structure Development Permit (SOP) to demolish a single-story single-family residence and construct a replacement two-story single-family residence with an attached two-car garage. The 8,360 square-foot lot is located within the Medium Residential (MR) Zone, and the Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ). The following is a breakdown of the existing floor area Proposed First Floor
Proposed Second Floor
Proposed First Floor Garage
Subtotal
Required Parking Exemption
Total Floor Area Proposed
1,713 SF
1,613 SF
485SF
3,811 SF
-400 SF
Maximum Allowable Floor Area (SROZ)
3,411 SF
3,413 SF
ATTACHMENT 4
October 19, 2021 VAC NOR

Page 2 of 3 ends

The maximum building height is proposed at 25.00 feet above the proposed grade with the highest pole at 100.75 feet above mean sea level (MSL).

DATE OF VAC MEETING: October 19, 2021
The project was heard at the October 19, 2021 regular meeting, which was conducted via teleconference in accordance with Government Code sections 54953(e) and 54954.3 and other applicable law.

FINDINGS:

1. The Applicants for the Structure Development Permit have made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the Claimants requesting view assessment. Written evidence of a good faith voluntary effort to meet and discuss view issues, or of a good faith voluntary offer to submit the matter to mediation, is hereby deemed to be a reasonable attempt to resolve view impairment issues.

Written accounts and oral testimony at the public meeting showed that there had been communication between the Applicants and the Claimant.

2. The proposed structure does not significantly impair any view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bikeways, walkways, equestrian trails), which has been identified in the City's General Plan or City designated viewing areas.

The subject property is not located within designated public viewing areas; therefore, the proposed structure does not significantly impair views from public property.

3. The proposed structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

The majority of the VAC members found the Claimant's primary view to be toward the northeast. By consensus, the VAC members found that the proposed structure, with two conditions, is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

4. There is significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application as proposed.

5. The proposed structure in general is not compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

The VAC members found that the proposed development is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character, including design, bulk, scale, height, and size.

VAC RECOMMENDATION:

VACVOTE:

Approve with Conditions.

October 19, 2021 VAC NOR

Page 3 of 3 ends

After discussion between the Commission, the Applicants and the Claimants, Commissioner Bishop moved to recommend approval of the project subject to the following conditions:
lowering the chimney height to 9 feet (14 feet above grade) and reducing the east-facing window above the master bath tub to 2 feet, 4 inches. Motion seconded by Commissioner Zajac. Passed 6/0/1 (Stribling Absent/Recused).

ISSUE DATE OF VAC RECOMMENDATION: October 19, 2021
r
Joseph~- , Com unity Development Director
Staff Liais n, View Assessment Committee t Committee
TO:

FROM:

MEETING DATE:

ORIGINATING DEPT:

SUBJECT:

DISCUSSION:
11-10-21 Mtg Item 8.1.

Updated Report #1

STAFF REPORT

STAFF REPORT UPDATE
Item# 8.1
The Staff Report includes incorrect lot size and maximum allowable floor area for the property located at 201 Ocean Street. 201 Ocean Street received City Council approval of a DRP/SDP and the associated Staff Report dated August 26, 2020 included the accurate lot size (7,817 square feet) and associated maximum floor area (3,318 square feet) for the property. Table 2 should be revised to reflect the following information for property #16; 201 Ocean Street, which shows that the approved square footage would not exceed the maximum allowable for the property:

Table 2
Lot Size in Existing ft2 Proposed/ Max. # Property Address ft2 Onsite Recently Allowable ft2 Zone (GIS) (Assessor's) Approved ft2
16 201 OCEAN ST 7,817 1,897 3,217 3,318 MR
The Staff Report incorrectly explains the required improvements within the public rightof-way (page 10 of 12). If approved, the Applicants will be required to remove the existing wall and widen the existing four-foot-wide sidewalk to six feet wide. The Applicants will also be required to provide landscaping between the back of the proposed sidewalk and the new retaining, wall which will be constructed on the property line. The revised Preliminary Grading Plan, which includes the six-foot-wide sidewalk and landscape area, is included in Attachment 1.

November 10, 2021
Blakely - 211 Ocean Street

Page 2 of 2 ends

Engineering Condition C.l.c. of Resolution 2021-128 shall be modified to read as follows:

Widening of the existing four feet wide sidewalk to six feet wide sidewalk with appropriate transitional sections to match the proposed driveway to the west and the existing sidewalk to the east as well as construction of landscaping between the back of the proposed sidewalk and the new retaining wall, which will be constructed on the property line.

GENERAL NOTES
I. N'f'ROVI,/._ OF THIS GRAOIHG PW/ 00£5 HOT COHSTmJTE: N'f'ROVI,/._ OF 16111CAl. OR HORJZONTAL N.JC11JifNT OF NIY PRJVATf RONJ SHO'flN HERfJN FOR PUBLJC R0NJ Pf/!IPOSES.

2. F1NAL APPROVAL OF 11/ESE GRADING PU.NS IS sue.ECT TO FINAL APPROVAL OF 1H£ ASSoaATED NPROYalENT PU.NS IIHERE APPUCABL£. F1NAL CURB GRADE: El.EVA TJ0NS MAY REQUIRE aw«;E5 IN 11/ESE PU.NS. J. llll'alT WAIDifA!.S SHAU. BE L£G.filY OOTAJNED. 4. A SEPARATf PiRII/T FRGII 1H£ CITY EHGIHWI lllll BE REQUIRED FOR NIY MOIIC IN 1H£ PUBLJC RIGHT--0'-WAY.

S. ALL SI.OPES 0161 1HREE (J) FEET IN HEIGHT SHAU. 8£ UJIIISCJ.Pf1) NID /RR/GA TED. 6. 1!1E CONT11ACTOR 9/ALL lmFY 1H£ EXIS1EJICE NID LOCATJON OF ALL UmmES BEFORE COllllEIIOHG MlRK. HOl!CE OF PROPOSED llOlK SHAU. BE CI\IEII TO 1H£ ro..LOMING ACENaE5' UND£RGIIOUNDS.A (B00)-227-2500

7. A 500.S llfl'()'IT SHAU. 8£ PROWlfD AS REQUIRED BY 1H£ CITY OF SOI.ANA BEACH PRIOR TO ISSVAHCE OF A GRADING PiRIIIT.

8. N'PROVAL OF TH£SE PU.NS BY 1H£ CITY EHGIHWI 00£5 HOT AU1HORIZE NIY llOlK OR GRADING TO BE F'Elll'ORUED UH111. 1H£ PRCPERTY OlHR'5 P£flW/SSlON HAS Bm1 OOTAJNED NID A VAUD GRADING PfRJ,//T HAS Bml /SSUED.

9. 1!1E CITY E1ICIHWl'S APPROVAL OF 11/ESE PU.NS 00£5 HOT CONS111UTE 1H£ 8U/LDIHG omctAL 's N'PROVAL OF N/Y FOUNDA 110N FOR SIRUCTURES TO BE Fu.CED OH 1H£ AREA C0\£1IED BY 11-IES£ PW/S. HO WA/161 OF 1HE GRADING ORD/NA/IC£ REQUIROIEHTS COHCERHIHG IJIMWl,t C0\61 0161 EXl'AHSf\£ SOOS IS WADE OR IIIPU£1J.

10. ALL OPEll),TJONS C0H0UCTED OH THE PREIIISE5. 11/CWD/NG THE WARIIIIIIG UP, REPAJR, ,IRRIVA(. DEPA/Ill/RE OR ~ OF !RUCKS, 001!/IIOWiG EQU/PllDIT. CONS1RUCTJON EQU/PllDIT NID NIY 01HER ASSoaA TED GRNJtHG EQU/PllDIT 9/ALL BE I..IIIITED TO THE Pf1l100 8ETMfDI 7:00 o.m. NID 6:00 p.m. c,ICH OAY.

IIOHOAY 1HROUQI F11/DA Y, NID HO £AR1HIJOWIG OR GRADING OPERATJONS SHAL1. BE COHOUCTED OH THE PREii/SES OH SAlllRDAlS, Sl/NOAYS OR HCUMYS IIIIHOUT 1H£ llll1TIEN P£flW/SSlON OF THE CITY EHGIHWI.

11. ALL JIAJOR SI.OPES 9/ALL BE ROOND£D INTO EXISTIHG lERRA/H ro PIWOUCE A CONTOORfJ) TRNISITJON FRGII CUT OR FlU. FACES ro IWIJIIAL GROOHO NID ABUTJlNG CUT OR FlU. FAC!'SC

12. HOTlll1HSTNIOING 1H£ 111M11W STAI/OARDS S£T FORTH IN THE GRNJING ORDINANC£, NID HOTIIITHSTN/0/NG 71£ APPROVAL OF 11/ESE GRADING PUNS, 1H£ P£RIIITIFI IS RESPOHSIBI£ FOR 71£ PR£\£NTJON OF OIJ.IAG£ TO 1H£ ADJACENT PRCPERTY. HO P£RSOH SHAL1. EXCAVATf OH LNID SO a.OSE TO THE PRCPERTY UHE AS TO Dll)N/GER N/Y A/JJCXN1NG PUBLJC STREIT. SIDEWA!X, AL1LY. FUHC110N OF NIY 5£WAG£ DISPOSAL SYSIDI, OR NIY 01HER PUBLJC OR F!11VA Tf PROPEIITY IIIIHOUT SUPPO/ITJHG NID PROTf:CTJHG sua< PRCPERTY FRGII SET1UHG. CRACKING, fJIOSIOH. Sil. T1HG SCOUR OR 01HER OIJ.IAG£ 1111/ai II/GIT RESULT FRGII 1H£ GRNJING D£SClllllED OH THIS PW/. 1H£ CITY lllll HOCll 71£ Pf:RMITIFI R£SPOHSl8I.£ FOR CORRECTJON OH HOIHIEDICATED IIIPROIOIEHTS 1111/ai OIJ.IAG£ ADJACENT PROPEIITY.

13. SUJP£ RA110S: CUT 1:2 Fili 1:2 CUT: JO CY FlU.: 80 CY llll'alT: 50 CY (NOTE:: A SEPARATf VAUD PfRJI/T IIUST EXIST FOR OFFS/Tf: llll'alT OR EXPORT AREAS.) u 1H£ DtJAHn11£S £5TIIJATED ABOVE ARE FOR PfRJ,//T PURPOS£5 OHL Y NID 9100/..D NOT 8£ USED FOR CONS1RUCnOH BIDS. CONIRACTORS ARE. R£SPOHSl8I.£ FOR 1HfJR Ol!N cARIHllOlK QUNlnnES.

14. S1'EctAL COHO/llOHS, IF NIY ARCHAEI.OGICAL RESOURCES ARE. DISC01£11£D OH 1H£ SIT£ OF THIS GRADING DURING GRAIJli/G OPEll),nOHS, sua, OPERATJONS IIILL CEASE u.tllEDIATfLY, AND 1H£ PfRJI/TIFI lllll HOnFY THE CITY EHGIHWI OF 1H£ DISC0161Y. GRADING OPERATJONS lllll HOT C0W£HCE UH111. THE Pf:RM/TIFI HAS REW\ED !lll1TIEN AUIHGRJTY FRGII THE CITY EHC/NEE11 ro 00 SO.

15. ALL GRADING 9/0MN OIi 1H/S PUN 9/ALL 8£ COIIPt£TED AS A SIHGUWI UNIT 111TH HO PROOSIOH FOR PA/111,IL R£!EASES. 9/00f..D IT BE NlnctPATED 11-IAT A PORnOH OF 1HIS PRO.ECT BE COIIPt£TED SEPARATf:LY, A SEPARATf: PUN NID Pf/11,//T N'f'UCAnOH SHAL1. BE 5UBIIITTED FOR APPROVAL.

16. 1H£ COl/1RACTal SHAU. HOnFY THE CITY OF SOI.ANA BEACH 858. 720.2470 24 HOURS BEFORE GRADING OPEii), TJONS BEGIN.

17. F1NISHED GRADING AND PUNTJHG SHAU. 8£ ACCOIIPUSIIED OH ALL SlQOES PRIOR ltl DCT06£R 1, OR IIIIIEDIATfLY UPON COIIPl..EnOH OF NIY SI.OPES CRADW 8E1Yf£EN DCT06£R I NID AF!11L 1. PRIOR TO NIY PUN11HG, ALL LNIOSCAPIHG 9/ALL 8£ APPROW 8Y 1H£ PLANN1HG DEPARTWEHT AT 1H£ D€\£LOPIIEHT ~ STAGE; OR SY SEPARATf LNIDCSAPE PW/.

18. ALL OFF-SIT£ HAUL ROUTES SHAU. BE 5UBIIITTED BY THE CONIRACTOR ltl 1H£ CITY EHCIN£E1I FOR APPROVAL 72 HOURS PRIOR TO TH£ 8EG/NNIHG OF MOIIC.

19. UPON FINAL COlll'l..ETIOII OF THE llOlK UHDER 1H£ GRADING Pf/11,//T, BUT PRIOR TO F1NAL GRADING APPROVAL AHO/OR FINAL R£J.EASE OF SEctJR/TY, NI AS-GRADED CEJ111flCATf: SHAL1. 8£ PROWlfD STATJHG:
"11£ GRADING UHD£R PfRJI/T No. SBGll-216 HAS BEEN PERFDRllED IN SIJBSTN/11,IL COIIFORIJAIIC£ 1111H 11-1£ APPROW GRADING PUN OR AS SHO'flN OIi THE A TTACHEO As-GRADED PLAN". THIS STA T£11EHT 9/ALL BE ro.J.OllED BY 1H£ OAT£ N1D SIGNAll/RE OF 1H£ CIW. EHCIN£E1I 111iO CEJl11F1ES SUCH A GRADING OPfRA110N. 2D. 1H£ CON111ACTOR SHAU. D£S/GN, CONS1RUCT. AHO UA/NTAJN ALL SN'FTY DE\ICES /Na.UDINC SHOR/NC, AHO 9/ALL BE R£SPOHSlill.£ FOR COHfORU/NG ro ALL LOCAL. STAIE AHO FEDERAi. SN'FTY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS AND REGUl.AnOHS.

EX/RiWL
101/EROOl!'!J
EROSION CONTROL NOTES PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I. SltlRII WAl!Jl AHO HON-SltlRII WAl!R DISctWIGE CONTROL: BEST IIAHNiOl£NT PRACT1CES SHN.I. 8£ DEVEl.OPfD AHO IIIP!DIEH1fJ) TO lolW4GE SltlRII WAl!R NID HON-SltlRII WAl!R Dt5CIWIGfS FRO/I 71£ Sill: AT ALL TIIJES OI.JRINC EXCAl!lnOH AHO GRADING AC1Mll£S.

2. EROS/OH AHO SED/IIEHT CONTROL: EROS/OH PRE\IEll1IOtl SHN.I. BE EUPHl,SIZD) AS 1!1E IIOST IUPORf.wT MEASURE FOR KID'fHG SEDtU£HT OH sm: OI.IRINC .EXCAIIIJJOH N/D GIIADING ACTMnfS.

SEDIIIDIT CDtmlOL5 SHN.I. BE USED AS A 5UPPt£IIEHT TO EROS/OH PR£VENIJON FOR KID'fHG SEDIIIDITOIIS/Tf.

J. EROS/OH CON11IOl OH St.OPES SHALL BE IIJT1GATfD BY INSTALLING WIDSCN'IIIG AS PER N'PR(J'1ED I.NIOSCAP£ PUNS AS REOUIRfD BY TH£ DEVELOPIIEHT Rf\l£W COHDl110ll5, OR BY TfUPOR.'l(r EROS/OH CON11IOl COHfORU/NG TO 11-1£ FOU.01IING:

J.SS/la1£. 2D
50 8
6 L
91 HQN-fRfflGATrn tfYQRQSW) w mm A flRffl MW1X AfflfD AT :f QOO I 6/ACRf I PlJR1TYIACR£
-PLUS
500fFE)
50% PLUS
ATRIPtEX
~
GUJJCA
PIN/Tl« IN5UWI/S EHCElJS FARfHOSA LOl\15 SCOPAR1US D/CHSCHDt..TZIA CALIF.

4. 11-1£ TOPS OF ALL St.OPES TAU£11 11WI 5' SHN.I. 8£ DIKED OR TRENCHED TO PRfl£NT WAl!Jl FI.OWWG 0\61 CRESTS OF St.OPES.

S. CATCH - 0£SILTIHG BASINS. NID STORII DRAIN SYST!l/S SHN.I. BE INSTALLED ro THE SATISFJCOON OF 11-IE CITY ENGINEER.

6. SAND &IC CH£CK lWIS, SILT FENCES. FIBER ROLLS OR 01H£R N'PR(J'1ED 8IIP'S SHN.I. 8£ P!ACED IN UHPA'/Ell ARtAS 111TH GRADtEHIS IN EXCESS OF 2X. AS llllL AS AT OR /£AR fl£l!Y PO/HT ll!iD1£ COIICEHTPJ,.Tf:D F1.Cllf LEAVE 11-1£ Sill:.

7. SAND IMGS SHN.I. 8£ P!ACED OH 1H£ UPS11lf'AU 5« OF ALL DtWHAGE: IM£TS TO ll1NIIIIZf: SILT 8/JltDUP IN 1H£ IM£TS NID PfffS.

8. 1!1E COHTTW:TOR SW.U RfJWR NIY ERODED SLOPES AS DIRECTED BY 11-IE oma; OF 11-IE CITY f:NGIH!IR.

9. THE C0HTTW:T0R SHN.I. 5WW' ROO>!l'AYS NID ENTRANCES TO NID FRGII 71-1£ Sill: OH A RfGU!AR 8'S/S TO l<UP lll£II FR££ OF SOIi. ACCUUUIAT10H NID AT ALL 01H£R TIIJ£S DIRECTED BY 1H£ CITY EHCtN£ER.

ID. 11-1£ COHTTW:TOR SHN.1. WAl!R Sill: OH A COHT1HUQU5 B4SIS ro UINIUlZ1': NR BORN£ DUST CREATED FRO/I GIW)ING AHO HAIJLIHC OPERA110NS OR EXCESSIVE IIINl) COI/DITJONS, AND AT ALL 1111£5 DIRECTED BY 1H£ CITY ENG/NEER.

11. IN 11-IE £\£NT 511.T 00£5 f:NTER THE EX/S11HG PUBLIC SltlRII DRAIN Sl'SIDI. REIIOVAL OF 11-IE SILT FRO/I 11-1£ 11-1£ SY5TOI IIIU. BE DOH£ AT 11-IE D£YELOPER's EXP9/Sf:.

B£DDINC COURSE-2" 1H/CX
OF t TO i" (NO.ll) AGGR£GATf
CL
PL
IE
FF
FG
FS
Fl. TlON XXX.X
EjfJ7?j,Gl'M;'A JKX, wx,x)
BOTTOIJ OF STEP BS PLANTER AREA P.A. TOP OF C1J11B TC TOP OF GRA Tf n; TOP OF WALL 1W FRCWT YARO SITBACK FYS8 REAR YARO SfTBACI( RYSB SID£ YARO SfTBACI( SYSB TOP OF WALL AT FlNISHED GRADE 1WOfC BOTTOIJ OF WALL AT Fl/'IISH£D GRADE BWO'G ROOF 001\N SPOUT OS EXIS17NG CONDmON IIIPfJMOUS: 4,000 SF
P£RYKJUS: 4,360 SF
PROPOSED CONDmON IIIPE1MOIJS:4,342SF HNID5CN'E: 1,663 SF BU/1.D/HG: 2,208 SF ADU: 451 P£RYKJUS: 4,018 SF lNIDSCAPE:. 1,419 sr P£RYKJUS: 1,889 SF POOL: 645 SF BUP: 65 SF
8'

SIDEWALK
/IOTf: NOT TO SCALE
CURB OU1l.ET
PERSDRS00.27
R.72.0
SIDfWALJ(
-ALL AGGR£GATf: IIUST BE CIDII/IIIISHED NID FRff OF F1N£5 (SAND, 511.T. £TC.) -TH£ MVERS SHN.I. HOT BE SE:AlEJ ONCE 1H£ \0/0 FIU.ER ™5 8E£H ADDfD -f:ACH COURSE SHN.I. BE -= COIIPACTED 8£FOl1( PUCEUEN1" OF llfXf COURSE -HO /IIPEJMOUS UIIEII OR Fll.l!R FASRJC IS ro BE USED -SPECW. --.J. REQUIRED FOR USE IN HIGHLY EXP.wsM SOIL - SU80flAJN UIY 8£ REQUIRED UCOIIS11IUC110NHOTE::
-MVERS TO 8£ COl£R£D AHO PROTfCTED DUR/NC COHS11IUC1IOH '-EXISTHJ/1£Sma
10/lE!SWS/fD

PROPOSED RESIDENCE
F.F. 76.42
PAD75.75

TYPICAL WALL CROSS SECTION,

ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN
I/OT ro SCAt£
BASIN DETAIL ll0TltlSOll.f
0 10

ENGINEER OF WORK CITY APPROVED CHANGES APP'D DATE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION _§fil:__~y: f'::>c,, r1c=oaie: __ 4============t==t==1 By:,,,-,:-;::-,---------- By: ____________ _ DnlwnBy !Name: BRIAN ARDOLINO ___ , -------------+--+---l ReviewEngineer 1------CityEngincer R.C.E. ___ _ jR.C.E. 71651 Exp: tW1L2J r D,i,,____ o,i,,____ Exp: __ _

VICINITY MAP NOTTO SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 10'
I 20 30
TW75.8
LEGAL DESCR/P170N LOT 14, II 81.0CK J OF SOIA"4 B£ACf/ VISTA IN 1H£ CITY OF SOIA"4 B£ACH, COUNTY OF SN/ DIEGO, STAT£ OF CN..IFORHIA ltCCORDIHG TO 1H£ omc1A/. 11N' Tl£REOF NO. 2143. f11.£D IN 1H£ OFFlC£ OF 1H£ SN/ 1Jl£GO COUNTY RECORD£11 OH DECEIIBER 17, 1926.

AP.N.: 26J-o<2-os
SITE ADDRESS :

OvVNERIPERM/TTEE:

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY :

WORK TO BE DONE
211 OCENI STR££r SOIA"4 B£ACf/, CA 92075
roRlJ AND CASSIE BIAK!:l.Y 211 DC&J/5111£ET SO!A"48£ACH, CA92D75 COISTAL LAND SOt.VTJOIIS
(760}2:Jo-6025
'/Rt fllPR(M.JIEHTS COIIS/ST OF THE ro..LOWING IKl'1K ro 8£ DONE ACCORDING ro 11-IES£ Pf.ANS AND 1H£ LATEST EDIT/OHS OF:

STANDARD SPECIF/CA17ONS
(I) STNIDNID SPWF/CA110NS FOR PU8UC lK1RKS COIIS11IUC1lON INCLUDING TH£ REGIONAL SUPPt£JIEHT>L AllalDll£HTS. (2) CA/.JfOlltM DE:1Wffll£Nf OF TRNISPORTATIOII "IWAAL OF ITWFlC CDtmlOL5 FOR CONSTRUCT10H AHO ~ IKl'1K ZOIIES" (J) STAT£ OF CAI.IFORN/,I, DE:1Wffll£Nf OF TRNISPORTATlOH STNIDNID SPWFICA110NS

STANDARD DRAWINGS
(I) SN/ 1Jl£GO REGIONAL STNl{WII) DRAWINGS
(2) STAT!: OF CAI.IFORN/,I, DE:1Wffll£Nf OF TRNISPORTAT10H STNIDNID PUNS LEGEND
~nc.w
PROPEi/TY I.II£

CENTERUIIE OF RGIJJ
PROPOSED 5E1!llCKS
PROPOSED HN1DSCN'£ PER WIOSCN'£ NIC/NTECT PWIS
PROPOSEDCOl{TDt}RI.I/£
I: .. ,, ,. .• -. , : . :- . -1 ------151-----
fXISrlNG COl{TDtJR I.II£
PROPOSED IIASl)Nfr( R£fNHIOO Ml4l1. PER PUii
fXISrlNG IIASl)Nfr( RETNIIINC Ml4l1.

PROPOSED Pl.ANTER N1£I t•:•:•:•···•:•:•·•:•:•1 PROPOSED 4-INCH S11JRII 0/INN PROPOSED ROiif OOll!I SPOUT
OvVNER'S CERTIFICATE
0:::: == == ==
•
=
~-ICKHCW,!£DG£ 1H£5E ~~~11-lfr~ 111TH IIY Fl/LL COHSENr. I FVLLY I.INDERSTNID AND ACCEPT 11-1£ TEl1U5 AHO CtJNDmONS CONTAINED HERfJN NID AS ATTACHED BY REFEREHCC OH 1H/S GRJDIHG Pl.NI.

IT IS l{;RffI) TW.T Fl£l.D COHDIT10N5 UIY REQUIRE CIWIGES TO 11-IES£ Pf.ANS.

IT IS FUR7ll£R lalfEJ m4T 11-IE OW/l£R (D£Yll.OP£R) SHN.I. HAVE A REGISTERED CML EHGIN£ER M.IKE: sua< CIW/GES, ALTERATJONS OR AODl110IIS ltl 11-IES£ Pf.ANS WHICH 11-IE CITY EHGIHWI OCfERIIIHE5 ARE. N£:c£5SARY AHO D£SIIW1I£ FOR THE PROPfJI CCIIPtETION OF1H£fllPR(M.JIEHTS.

I FURTHER AGRE£ TO COUIIEHCE IKl'1K OIi NIY IUPR<NEIIEHTS SHOWN OH 11-IES£ PUNS W11HIN EX/S11HG CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY W11HIN 60 DAYS OF 11-IE CONSTRUCT10H Pf/11,//T AHO TO PUIISOC SUCH IKl'1K AC1Ml.Y OH fl£l!Y NORIIAL WORKING DAY UH11I. COIIPIETED, IRR£SP£CTNE AND INDEPENDENT OF ANY CJ1H£R lmRK' ~TED WITH THIS PROJECT OR UHD£R IIY COll11IOL. roRlJ AND CASSIE BVJ<£LY 211 OCEAN ST1l£ET SOIA"4 B£ACH. CA 92075

DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
DA1E
I, BRWI II. ARDOLINO, H£REBY DECLARE TW.T I NJ 1H£ EHGIN£ER OF IKl'1K FOR 1H/S PROJECT, TW.T I HAVE EXCERCISED R£SPOIISIBtE CHMGC OVER THE D£5ICN OF 11-IE PROJECT AS W1Nfll IN SECT/OH 6703 OF 1H£ 8I/SIN£SS AND PROFrSSIOIIS COD£, NID TH£ D£51GN IS CONSISTEHT 111TH CURR£Hr STANOARDS AHO 11-IE CITY OF SOIA"4 8EACH R£SO/.UnOH Ho. 2007-170.

I UNDERSTAND TW.T 1H£ CH£CK OF PROJECT 0/l,ltll/lGS AHO SPWF/CATJONS BY THE CITY OF SOl,W, B£ACH IS COHf1tlED TO A REl'l£ll' ONLY NID 00£5 HOT R£U£YE lie OF RESPOIISIBIUT1f FOR PROJECT DESIGN.

BY·---------------- BRIAN ARDOLJNO RC£ No. 71651 £XP 12/31/2021 PASCO LARIT sunra d: ASSOCIATES ADU EARTHWORK QUANT/17ES : EARTHWORK QUAN17TIES :
sm: GIIADING:

CUT: S CY FlU.: 0 CY
.EXCAVAT10H FOR FOOTINGS: 0 CY
Sill: GIW)ING (OUTSIOC OF STRUCTURE): CUT: JD CY FlU.: 80 CY .EXCAVAnOH FOR FOOTlll(;S: 5 CY
REIIOVAL k RECOIIPACTIOH (UHDER STRUCTURE): 16 CY R£1/0VAL k RECOIIPAC1IOII (UHD£R S111UCTURE): 100 CY TOTAL GRltDtHG : 21 CY
TOTAL EXPORT: 5 CY
ltlTAL GIW1ING (CUT NID FILJ. OUTSlOC d: BELOW STRUC11JR£) : 215 CY TOTAL IUPORT: 50 CY
• rARllft,{)111( Ol.Wm11£S AR£ E:STIUATED FOR Pf/11,//T PURPOS£5 OHLY AHO REPR'£SEHT C01'PACTED (IN PLACE) VOWll£5 ONLY. 1H£Sf:

VAW£S AR£ CALCULATED OH A 7HEORE11CAI. BASJS. AC1U<L QUAHTl1lES lolAY VARY DU£ 70 OBSERVED SHRllll(AGE AND/OR S\l£LL FACTORS.

COASTAL COIIUISS/ON PERIIIT NO.

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH PRELJUINARY GRAIJli/G PUN FOR:

DRAWING NO.

DRP21-004
SDP21-004
SHEET 1 OF 1
Pl.SA 3566
Blakely Residence
DRP21-004 / SDP21-016
City Council Meeting
State Marine ...

Annie's Canyon Trail Q
G') Zco
G') :::,
..... 3
Cl 0 :::, ::J Cl) ....
c.. 0 0 .... en
~ (I)
(/)
z.
ti)
a. Solana Beach ~ ;.:
(I)
Via De La Valle
~aV\ctoria
Lomas Santa Fe or
V
m
El
11-10-21 Mtg Item B.1.

Presented by Staff
Zoning Designation
Medium Residential (MR) - 5-7 Dwelling Units per Acre
2 Note: The outline shown is approximate and is not intended to show the actual property lines.

Aerial Photo
3 Note: The outline shown is approximate and is not intended to show the actual property lines. 4 Zoning Regulations
and Permit Threshold
• DRP Required per SBMC §17.68.040(B)(l):
d: Grading in excess of 100 cubic yards
n: i. Construction in excess of 60% of the
maximum allowable floor area.
ii. Construction of a second level that
exceeds 35% of the main level floor
area.
• SOP Required per SBMC §17.63.040:

Construction of an addition in excess of
16 feet in height above pre-existing grade
5 Project Descri~tion
Lot Size: 8,360 ft 2
Maximum Allowable Floor Area: 8,413 ft 2
Proposed Floor Area:

Proposed First Floor
Proposed Second Floor
Proposed First Floor Garage
Subtotal
Off-Street Parking Exemption
Total Proposed Floor Area
1,713 ft2
1,613 ft2
485 ft2
3,811 ft2
- 400 ft2
3,411 ft2
Maximum Height Proposed: 25.00 ft above existing grade, 100.75 MSL Grading: 30 yd3 of cut, 80 yd3 of fill, 5 yd3 of excavation for footings, 100 yd3 of removal/recompaction, and 50 yd3 of export (215 yd3 of aggregate grading) Setbacks: Required Proposed Residence
Front (N)* 201 221
Interior Side (E) 51 5 1
Interior Side (W) 51 5 1
Rear (S) 251 581
View of the Site from Ocean Street
6 12
Table 2
#
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Neighborhood Compatibility
Lot Size in Existing ft2
Property Address ft2 Onsite
(GIS) (Assessor's)
620 E CIRCLE DR 8 000 1602
604 E CIRCLE DR 6 500 1498
616 W CIRCLE DR 14 900 2 409
606 W Cl RCLE DR 7 100 2 924
230 OCEAN ST 7 100 3 161
222 OCEAN ST 6 700 3 141
216 OCEAN ST 5 800 4 0891
212 OCEAN ST 6 600 1452
202 OCEAN ST 10 900 2 016
615 E CIRCLE DR 12 000 2 913
528 PACIFIC AVE 5 963 2 647
524 PACIFIC AVE 6 800 4 8972
520 PACIFIC AVE 6 800 4 4812
223 OCEAN ST 12 679 4 036
2110CEAN ST 8 300 1259
201 OCEAN ST 7 817 1897
527 N ACACIA AVE 6 700 884
523 N ACACIA AVE 6 750 1 016
519 NACACIAAVE 6 400 2 145
515 NACACIAAVE 6 200 3 866
510 PACIFIC AVE 6 600 2 447
512 PACIFIC AVE 6 700 1414
514 PACIFIC AVE 6 600 1542
516 PACIFIC AVE 6 700 1827
199 OCEAN ST 6 700 2 733
514 NACACIAAVE 5 000 3 0462
516 NACACIAAVE 4 900 1230
518 NACACIAAVE 4,900 2,730
Proposed/
Recently
App roved ft2
3 326
3 2 17
Max.

Al Iowa ble ft2
3 350
3 088
4 558
3 193
3 193
3 123
2 900
3 105
3 858
4 050
2 982
3 140
3 140
4 169
3 403
3 318
3 123
3 131
3 070
3 035
3 105
3 123
3 105
3 123
3 123
2 500
2 450
2 450
Zan
e
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
NOTE: The square footage information
referenced above has been obtained from the
City's Beach Database and the San Diego County
Assessor's Office. The County Assessor's Office
does not assume liability for the accuracy of the
above information. Square footages of existing
structures detailed above only include
habitable living area (not gross floor area as
defined by the City of Solana Beach). Square
footages for existing structures do not include
out-building, accessory structure, garage and/or
basement.

Table revised from Staff Report based on Blue Folder information.

...
w
w
a:
...
"'
~ - w
0 0
~01 r~
10 I..OT15
I
I
I
)' ~,
I
I
I
I
Site Plan
,, LOT11
~. \ ,) ,. . -- - -- t
-~ ··---
•, . Lo-, 7
~ .. .
~
_-, ..
=I ..... '.· ~~~~L..J~ .~ :,'.:

PROPOSED 2 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE J:~78.A.2
MOi~i~
FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES i. 08!.IROCIION of ROADWAYS DUAJHG CONSTAUCTlON:

Al~UlalC.,itM!llrn.lfflOC20JMCln"'<IJ'I
PROJECT INFORMA T10N
AF*- 2UOl2-00-00
Sl'Tf ADDfl£SS.;
211 OCf.ANSTilfET SCl»IA lfAOt, CA 12075
LfGAL DE50tPT10N;
LO't ◄, NkCXX 3C,. SOI...ANABEAOf\1$TA..1HnE arv o, S0lANA IEAOt. OOUNTY OF SAN CEGO, sr,,n OF CA., ~ TO THE OfflCW. MAP THEftf0f NO. 21 , Fl.ED IN THE CFAC fY. THE SAN DIEGOC0..NT'I'
RECORCERONDE<Dl3Ell 17, 1!128
11 I
I
I
I
I
f !!e.

I
I
' '
! !---------- '
-------------
~~-
First Floor Plan ··-·--··-··-··-··--·-··-··--·-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··--·-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··, -- ------+-..,.,.... _.)
.....
---------- ,7 ,/
,/I I ./ ' / /_/
.-,-~ // /
/) _., •• ✓-
/ / / ///
n1--------,L-----~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/ / I ,,
-·~ _/,/
//'
/ ..

Second Floor Plan
U_Jb1---&--====-a::1!=::::!!!!!!!:,ii,;;;o!::1!=--:::!!!:i-a:!!!!-===-----==:6.--------=L..l..l-----------~ 12 11---..:....11111--'--__J
Roof Plan
/
/
/
- - - - - - - - - l=I l=dbdbdld~ i=ll=dbd, / •:.
~.F.1=-=-=-~-~=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-~~":!1 IMOI' -•-"--eut \=. - - - - -- - -==~ ~ I , -------r-=-------------------------------~------------------ --------------------------------------L-/ /
/
/
/
/
/
North (Front} Elevation
. ~ROPERTY LINE ~f ,SETBACKLl~E- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - I:1~X~U~ D~<:_HEIG~~ ~TANDING SEAM METALROOF - 100.7i MAXROOFHGT - - -M~AL CLAD ~ -- ~ : - 99.85'1RIDGE
WOOD WINDOWS ~ r---: r---::::: I I
I :;:..- r--::--.:: I I
I ~~"" r :::::-- -,.::-..:: PAINTED 12'' SQ I c ::::::::----- ...:~ .- :;:..- c .-- .._ v -WOOD POST c :::::-- rs • I "'-""i~~~iill -- 0 0ARD!& BATTEN SIDING I r ~~ --~~ v - I ~ / I
I ✓ I
- - t----1,------1 .. ET AL M ILi NG /
_ • 91.08' ~LING
- - - - I- - llfHfl HIH I llillW - - - - - 88.'!l3' RIDGEHGT.J'- , ~ I II~ - 87.~3'__ ~ ~ I
LINE Of' EX STRUCT
v~--+•1 0 BE REMOVED
9 I
i j - I -
VERTICAL -lvooD SIDING-=
I ~ I .., I .. 5'-0" - I ;:,c l of\1.-r.. ~
I
I - I .,. - 1sp:3r- .,
l ,---- -.-
'- I
"I I

I -- --
1 re - 87 63'bECK
~?=!:: =1 ,. - .... .......... '- I 11===::!';ll;:::::::::!';;:II ==:!';;::::::::!';;llll::::i...,,_~l...-==l --:....;,... 11 ---,,----,,--..,,............-------,,---,,---,,----,,--.-------,,---,,-II ~ I i II II II I'---...PAINTEP 2X_ FASCIA i I I I I I I I I I I I ~ WOOD L.GE DOOR
I I i V ;:,c 50" I of\1.-r.. J, j
: --,~ii ,.., ',i.FI GRADE
I
I
I I II ir\_-T [Fl~SH GRADE~

METAL CLAD

EXISTING GRADE OOD DOORS
13 South (Rear} Elevation
• .,....,.-------PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE~ I
V 100 75' ,cSETBACK LINE _ 100.75' MAX ROOF HT ,-MAX BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACK LINE-=:\... -t ~ :::~ -ll I ~~~~~~;, ~ 1 ~ _,,!,.

ROOI ~ 11 111--::.--'SI:~;..,, ~'' II I II I II I~ ::, , 1 --::;:.- - in;:=$::;'rr:~~ ::, I :

I I PAINTED 12" SQ L---r- : vvOOD POST
I I ... ETAL RAILING
......,....,.'rri''r'i'nFllll---r-~ : LINE OF EX STRUCT _ n 1 ---~ as'-19· 1 0 BE REMOVED
J---T p::;:::c_;t. 11:r- ~ :
-- --
-- - -
ffl
-- --
-- --
fl "' I, I I . J.._. "'S? I , ~ 3• DEC ..-,
i ~·_.!:1= ,..,===========~ =:!....-----=::...-.-----------..:JI·~ ;:'~ i :

87.2T TRELLI- ~
_. I .... ....
• r---.. t I
: 5'-0" - - - - - - - t '--..__ '----- i
11 r u .... .... .., II II II II II II II
• SETBACK -- rt "---J__pAINTED 2X_ FASCIA
• ;.i : I
I
I
1!1 - - -- -------- .. I ~ [ !-0" I
L - I
I
I
I
•
~ t . t1 7 76.42 F.F. -- --
1 \_~XISTING W~ll TO\ ~ INISH GRADE
REMAIN J ~ XISTING GRADE
14 ~ - I
I
I
I
[ St. BACK ,
... ! ~- I
I
j;. I
- - 76142' F.F. l'I
I I I 7 FIN GRADE
\ " ETAL CL.AO ~ OODDOORS
.

I
East (Side} Elevation
:---------------------------------·~..,.......,.,....,.......,..,...,......,.rrr.--r,---rrm-.--.rrrm---rrm-.--.rrrm---rr']:,..""T"T""">rr-r-m"T"T"T-,--y-~ ' ' I
NTMCS~
15 i
West (Side} Elevation
--- SUHlM:ia.-..tia.t.111..7:\.. IIIIPS ....il.MICr"' r --------- ---~ 1 I I I I I I I
-·-~w ~ .. j "' 18 ~ ~,ic,.r I
~- - ,_,.. I "' ' "' >--
- - - - - -- - - - --- - - - --- - -,-• - - - -- - - --- n n n n n n n l,~J ' -
l ~ ...,,., ... , '
~ =~ ~ ' ' ' I ' ' T ' { ~ IT ' ' J ' '
' .... 1, ~,~...::. I• ,- 1,
1: .. ,., - 1: '
II ' - ------ ' UCOl>US1'1UC1 ,o. =~ -~= -- \...--- --
n
~
' - --
..__, .....
---
1 ---aStl i roSE
I
16 • Prelim 1nary
t'OT13
'-._ EXISTtlGIIESW<E
rotErows>ED
PROPOSED RF.SIOO\JCE F.F. 76.42
l'AD 75.75
Grading Pia n

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
Public Right-of-Way improvements revised per Blue Folder information -- SCALE 1-• 10

DECOMPOSED

GRANITE

PROVIDE HANO
42"H,GH F
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APflON IN RG-IT-OF-WAY
17 Conceptual Landscape Plan
F·''<;? iji FR '-
Jt- SPA \ iP --,,,,
SEO 2 STORY •;fl-a-,,J-,--!:,,_.+• _-.;,,~ :::,;:::.,:;:::;;;::;;:;;:;;:;:;;,;;;:;;;~ ,;::;;:;;;:,;;;::+-.=J...-6~~~~ AMILY RESIDEN FF76 67 ., PA0 76.0 ~'-~'-
= -'-'all\::,~~~~ ~~j--
.,,ll/'
/

A'CCESSORY
/ / )W ELLING UNIT
_/'
PLANT LEGEND SY~180l DESCRJPTION
0 ACC.A (FBJOA) SEU.OWIANA - PINEAPPLE GUAVA
• AEONIUM 'SUNBURSr • SUNBURST AEONIUM
.. AtOE STRlATA • GHOST ALOE
@ CHONOROPETALUM TECTORUM • CAPE RUSH
e OIANELLA l.lTTI.E REV•
~ DIETES BlCOLOR - FORTNIGHT UlY
© UMONIUM PEREZII - STATICE
~ MUHLEN6ERGIA RIGENS - DEER GRASS
@ RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'MINOR'· O'NARF YEDDO
e WESTRINGIA 'GRAY BOX' - COAST ROSEMARY
@ 60UGAINVILLEA 8ARBARA KARST'

ESPALUER ONTO WALUFENCE

OLEA 'SWANN HILL' - FRUITLESS OLIVE
0 FRUIT TREE - DWARF

MEYER LEMON

BEARRSLIME

NAVEL ORANGE
8 PITTOSPORUM 'SILVER SHEEN' KOHUHU
MATURE
HEIGHT
18'·25'
2'
2'
3'
2'
2'
2'
3'
4'
2'-3'
30'
20'-35'
8'-10'
12'-15'
FRUIT
TREE {TYP.)
FRUIT\.£SS OLIVE
WATER MIN.

USE SIZE QUANTITY
LOW 5GAL 10
LOW lGAL 44
LOW 5GAL 29
LOW 5GAL
LOW lGAL 17
LOW 5GAL
LOW 1 GAL 23
LOW >GAL. ., LOW >GAL. '4
LOW >GAL
LOW >GAL.

LOW 36"BOX
MULTI
$LA 15GAL
MOO 15GAL
18 Structure Development Permit
• Story poles installed/certified on June 18, 2021.
• Notices were mailed establishing a 30-day deadline
to file for View Assessment on August 12, 2021.
• One application for View Assessment was received;
Carome - 201 Ocean Street (Attachment 3).
• VAC made a unanimous recommendation to
approve with conditions on October 19, 2021 :
- Reduction in height of the proposed chimney
- Reduction of the vertical height of an east-facing
window
• VAC Recommendation included in Attachment 4
19 View Claimant Location
Claimant:

Asli Carome
c/o Julie Hamilton
201 Ocean Street
Applicant:

Ford and Cassie Blakely
tii/"j 211 Ocean Street
Carome - 201 Ocean Street
Standing on Patio
20 Carome - 201 Ocean Street
Sitting on Patio
21 Carome - 201 Ocean Street
Standing at Fire Pit
22 Carome - 201 Ocean Street
Sitting at Fire Pit
23 Carome - 201 Ocean Street
Standing at Dinning Room Exterior Door
24 Carome - 201 Ocean Street
Standing in Primary Bedroom
25 Carome - 201 Ocean Street
Standing in Primary Bedroom - Zoom
26 Carome - 201 Ocean Street
Standing in Living Room
27 Carome - 201 Ocean Street
Standing in Living Room - Zoom
28 29
Viewing Area Definition
Subsection 17.63.020(1)
"Viewing area" shall be that area of the structure
(excluding bathrooms, hallways, garages or closets) or lot (excluding the building setback areas) where the view
assessment committee, or the city council on appeal,
determines the best and most important view exists. The finished floor elevation of any viewing area must be at or above existing grade adjacent to the exterior wall of the part of the building nearest to that viewing area. The
determination shall be made by balancing the nature of
the view to be protected and the importance of the area of the structure or lot from where the view is taken.

View Assessment - Decision Making
In deciding on a matter for which view assessment has been requested, the Council must:
■ Provide disclosures;
■ Determine primary viewing area for the Claimant; and
■ Determine if significant view impairment exists from . . . pnmary v1ew1ng area 30 31
Findings - View Assessment
In making a decision on a matter for which view assessment has been requested, the Council is required to make the following five (5) findings:

1. The Applicant for the Structure Development Permit has made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the person(s) requesting View Assessment.

2. The proposed structure does not significantly impair a view from public property.

3. The proposed structure is designed and situated 1n such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

4. There is no significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application.

5. The proposed structure 1s compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.
32 Development Review Permit
Reguired Findings
The City Council may approve or conditionally approve a Development Review Permit only if all of the following findings can be made:

1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of Title 17 (Zoning), including special regulations, overlay zones, and specific plans.

2. The proposed development complies with the development review criteria set forth in SBMC §17.68.040.F:
1) Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses; 2) Building and Structure Placement; 3) Landscaping; 4) Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas; 5) Grading; 6) Lighting; and 7) Usable Open Spaces

3. All required permits and approvals, including the Structure Development Permit have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the DRP.

4. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the applicant obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.
33 DRP21-004 / SDP21-004
211 Ocean Street
Staff Recommendation

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony and Close the Public Hearing;

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2021-128 conditionally approving a DRP and SDP to demolish a single-family residence, construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 211 Ocean Street, Solana Beach.

Home Owner:

Architect:

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Ford & Cassie Blakely
211 Ocean Street
Solana Beach, CA
Craig Friehauf
Structure Development Permit
Development Review Permit
11-10-Mtg Item 8.1.

Presented by Applicant
1 BACKGROUND ON OUR DESIGN
We respect and value the Solana Beach view protection process.

We designed our house to minimize impacts on our neighbors.

We specifically designed our house to minimize the impact on Ms.

Carome's residence (VAC Claimant).

When designing our home, we focused on both view consideration and DRP considerations (scale, mass, bulk and building placement). 2 IMAGE OF PROPOSED HOME
• The elevation of our lot is 9'6" higher
than Ms. Carome's lot and only 50 feet
wide. Anything we build on our lot will
be visible from Ms. Carome's yard.
• We intentionally designed the second
story mass & bulk to be located on the
west side of our lot.
• Our second story is setback 20ft from
our east property line (Ms. Carome's lot).
3 VAC RECOMMENDATION
VAC Commissioners unanimously determined that our proposed house does not impact a protectable view for Ms. Carome based on the following:

1. Ms. Carome's primary view is actually to the Northeast (toward the Rail Trail and Lagoon). Not to the West in the direction of our home.

2. Ms. Carome's claim of a "sky-view11 (i.e., a view of the sky) is not a natural geographic feature as protected under the View Ordinance. (See SBMC 17.63.010, "purpose and intent11)
4 PRIVACY & DAYLIGHT
Although privacy and daylight were not findings for the VAC, we took proactive measures to address Ms. Carome's initial concerns.

1. We situated the two-story element of our house 20+ feet away from our common property line with Ms. Carome.

2. We used a low slope roof of 3:12 to maximize daylight.

3. The window sizes and locations on the east side of our house are designed to minimize privacy concerns for our neighbors and us. 5 DESIGN CHANGES MADE FOR CLAIMANT
In addition to placing the bulk of second story on west side, we have made the following additional changes in response to Ms. Carome's requests:

1. We lowered the chimney by 9 feet. It will now be lower than our second story roof.

2. We raised the bottom level of the window in our bathroom to provide more privacy for us and Ms. Carome.

3. We added new vegetation on our Landscape Plan to screen our southernly second story balcony to provide privacy for Ms. Carome and us.
6 1.) AGREED TO LOWER CHIMNEY
BEFORE
AFTER
7 1.) AGREED TO LOWER CHIMNEY (cont.)

BEFORE AFTER
0 2.) AGREED TO RAISE BATHROOM WINDOW
BEFORE
AFTER
9 3.) AGREED TO ADD VEGETATION IN FRONT OF

SOUTHERNLY BALCONY
BEFORE
AFTER
10 DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT
The scale, mass, bulk and placement of our proposed home on our lot is compatible with other homes in our neighborhood.

The shape and low slope of the roof combined with the one-story and two-story elements of the house, and the articulation of the various facades of the house, reduce the apparent scale of the house.

The architectural design of our house with sloped roofs, varied building shapes and forms, and articulation of the building facades is compatible with the character of our neighborhood.

Our design provides a setback of our second story from the first story on the east side of our home (the common property line with Ms. Carome). This setback placement of our second story minimizes the mass and bulk on the east side. The impact on Ms. Carome is minimal. 11 COMPATIBILITY OF THE DESIGN WITH THE

NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER
223 OCEAN ST.
12 COMPATIBILITY OF SCALE, MASS AND BULK

IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD
13 REQUESTED ACTION
• We designed our home to minimize the impacts to our neighbors. • The VAC Commissioners unanimously determined that our project does not cause a view impairment for Ms. Carome.
• Knowing privacy and daylight are not Findings for the VAC, we proactively re-submitted the plans before you with following the changes:

1. The chimney was lowered 9 feet and will now be lower than second story roof.

2. The bottom of the bathroom window was raised to have a minimum sill height of 4.5 feet; and

3. Our landscape plan now provides for the vegetation adjacent to our southernly second story balcony. • We request your approval of our home.
14 ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED BY VIEW CLAIMANT

ADDITIONAL REQUESTS OUR RESPONSE
Increase the set-back on the east side by 5 feet. Our plan only places the one-story portion of the new home 2.5 ft. closer to the setback on the
east side of our house.

Remove the 2nd Story floor balcony in the
southeast corner.

Reduce slope by using a lower pitch roof.
----~
Reduce overall height by 4-5 feet.

We agreed to add vegetation and updated
landscape plan to provide privacy for Ms.

Carome and us.

We already using a 3:12 roof. We calculated that
if the roof slope is reduced to a 2:12 slope, then
the roof will only be lowered by 10-12 inches.

We located the mass and bulk of the second
story on the west side of the house to reduce
the impact of the second story on Ms. Carome's
property.
18 EASTERN SIDE OF HOME
1 19% -1------81% ----------i
1111111111111 111111111111111 I I I I 111111111111111

II II II II II II I II II II II II I II II II II II II II II , 1
11 i' I I I II
II
I 1111

II I I II I II II
1111 1111
19 /
/
/
/
/
/
5'-0" /
SY SETBACK ( '_/: ~:• - -
Daylight Planes (Front Cross Section)
/
/
r---------------------- ------------
M. BEDROOM

OFFICE ENTRY GARAGE -
20 Daylight Planes (Middle Cross Section)
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/

MAIN BATH
FOYER
STAIRS
21 /
5'-0" \,
SY SETBACK f -/: _ _\:•_ -
I
I
I
I
Daylight Planes (Back Cross Section)
/
/
/
~------------------~~-~-------

BEDROOM BEDROOM

GREAT ROOM
22 EXCERPT FROM MS. CAROME PRESENTATION
Daylight Plane

NORTH ELEVATION
10/18/2021 SCA E:1/8" = I 1''.l{Y f· 16
23 11-10-21 Mtg Item B.1.

Presented by Carome/Hamilton
211 Ocean Street
-I
::r
rt)
r
ll)
~
0 =B
n
rt)
0 ---,.,
LC
ro·
s:

I
ll)
3 ......
0 ::,
The findings
for a
development
review permit
cannot be
made.
• 17.68.040H.1.
• The proposed development is consistent with the
general plan and all applicable requirements of
this title, including special regulations, overlay
zones, and specific plans.
• The project exceeds the allowable FAR by 447 sf
because the applicant failed to include the ADU in
the calculation of gross floor area.
• 17 .68.040 H .2.
• The proposed development complies with the
development review criteria set forth in subsection
F of this section.
• The building is not sited and designed to minimize
adverse impacts on the adjacent property.
11/10/2021 2
• Max. allowable floor area is 3,413 sf.
• The applicant and the City state the project
has a gross floor area of 3,411 sf with tne
parking exemption.
• This floor area fails to include the floor area
of the ADU according to Sheet 4 found on
page 114 of the agenda packet.
• Solana Beach Municipal Code 17.20.040
D.4.c. requires that all accessory dwelling
units shall conform to all property
development regulations of the zone
including floor area ratio (FAR).
• The exception provided in subsection iii.
should only be applied to ADUs where the
existing primary residence would preclude an
ADU. This is a new project, the ADU can be
accommodated within the FAR by reducing
the size of the proposed residence.
• Calling this a future ADU is an "end run11
around the FAR limits.
ffice of Julie M. Hamilton 3
Finding 2
The project does not meet
the Development Review
Criteria.

I
If :l38o .. :,,o I - 810
. e<o .J.
.J!fP_______ <1eo.1so
- - 810'
l!J]- · J~,,
;J· ~~ .. , , !:.' Qi ,)$,*
• I I !.L....,.:Ji. I}
\
()
,/ ,_ d $: \ I- :l5fio ~ i
/}5/J ~
/'J ---,. "'
2 "
~ ... ~, "'£!l
(ff
I
,/'; <> ., ~
I
~
'
(j
l
Development Review Criteria
• Solana Beach Municipal Code 17.68.040 F.2.

Building and Structure Placement. Buildings and
structures shall be sited and designed to minimize
adverse impacts on the surrounding properties and
designed in a manner which visually and functionally
enhance their intended use and complement existing
site topography. Multi-family residential buildings shall be sited to avoid crowding and to allow for a functional use of the space between buildings.

The Law Office of Julie M. Hamilton 5
• As designed the structure will:
• Invade the privacy of Appellant's
bedroom and outdoor living area.
• Have a significant shadowing effect on
Appellant's home and yard.
• Block Appellant's view of the sky and
sunset to the west.
• Height will encroach into the
recommended daylight plane on three
sides
ffice of Julie M. Hamilton 6
View into Appellant's home from proposed
deck.
11/10/2021 The Law Office of Julie M. Hamilton 7
View into Appellant's home from Blakely's
proposed 2nd bedroom.
11/10/2021 The Law Office of Julie M. Hamilton 8
Existing view from Carome's outdoor living area.
11/10/2021 The Law Office of Julie M. Hamilton 9
Blakely's proposed structure as seen from Carome's outdoor living area.
11/10/2021 The Law Office of Julie M. Hamilton 10
View from master bedroom.
11/10/2021 The Law Office of Julie M. Hamilton 11
Shadow Study- Winter and Summer
Solstice
12/21 1 0:00AM 06/21 7:00AM 06/21 4:00PM
12/21 1 :00PM 06/21 10:00AM 06/21 7:00PM
11/10/2021 12/21 4:00PM 12
I Perceived Height
11/10/2021
• The finished floor elevation of 211 Ocean is nearly 10 feet above the finished floor elevation of 201 Ocean, increasing the Applicant's proposed height of 25' to a perceived height of 35'.
211 Ocean F.F. 76.42
201 Ocean F.F. 66.93
The Law Office of Julie M. Hamilton 13
Extends beyond daylight plane on 3 sides
11/10/2021
. ~ROPERlY LINE

V ,SETBACK LINE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - F MAX BUILDING HEIGHT ------- 1
• ---i--------- ~---100.7~ MAX ROOF HGT
--------+----F99.85'f 1DGE
I
.
•
OARD0& BATTEN SIDING
I
•
lllr='il=lll=Hltl--t-H l--t--tt-,1-Tlt--t---t'l't--t--tl-t--t--Hrt--t-,"'l--- -t-METAL ~ILING I
I
CAL i ooo SIDING . I
I
I
I s·-o· SETBACK
- T - -\ - 1

INISH GRADE
~XISTING GRADE

NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE:1/8" = 1 '-0"
The Law Office of Julie M. Hamilton

91.08'~1LING
LINE 01' EX STRUCT .,--+-.,;;..BE~EMOVED
•

7.63'f ECK
• • AINTE~ 2X_ FASCIA
• • I
000 GARAGE DOOR
'
J
1 F::f:JGRADE
• •
14 Extends beyond daylight plane on 3 sides.
11/10/2021
~

PROPERTY LINE
~ETBACK LINE . 100.75'
MAX ROOF Hf
I
~I ~~: ~~~ ~
II
-- -- ->- ->-
~RAILI
~ -=3'DEC "'' I
I 5'-0"

I SETBACK
I

PROPERTY LINE
100 75' MAX ROOF HT
0:::::: "'
-~ · ~ ~~~::c.: ~ I
L MAX BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACK LINE ~
-- -- i-,_ I
I
I
I
- 97'.24' I
I
I
_l_PA JNTED 12" SO
00D POST
111 r ~ ~ i ~ Il l - - - -II I
- ~ --- I IJ I~ u - -, II II II
~- -- -- ~- -- ,_ _
Ill I 1 -~ II II II II II
- I "
;--- I
......... 1 M ETAL RAILING
--- _!_LJ I
~ --: ------SP'ssi7s·

NE OF EX STRUCT QBE REMOVED
iii I ~ I ~ c
~
i I
' ---c;:::: I
rs- I
"- I
~ PA I INTED 2X_ FASCIA
I
I -0" I

SE BACK
I
~ ~ ~ :~ ~ I
i• l ....,IM2: F.F.

I
-~ -~ I --76
1 42' F.F I I
1 7[ Fl
' \_EXISTING W~LL TO\_~INISH GRADE ~~TAL CLAD I REMAIN EXISTING GRADE OODDOORS

N GRADE

SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1 '-0"
The Law Office of Julie M. Hamilton 15
Extends beyond daylight plane on 3 sides
20'-0"
~ ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1007SMAXROOFKT i,,,,,i-- -
SETBACKLINE~ 11 1111 I _LJ...i,,,,, __ .. iSTANDING SEAM METAL ROOF I
--- D IW w l[ffi1rn11 I PAINTED 12" SQ I
--- WOOD POST "1 -~ ~=
METAL RAIUN I -~ I 1,---METI
mm 11111111 IJ
--= '=- '=---='=- -- ~ ill fil ill m m - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 --- --- - - ;() -- -- ----------,

1.,. I - - -- n - I
I - ~ LJLJ: ll ~
PAINTED 2X_ FASCI I ~=-~ ~-- I
I -- I
I I
I - - ,.._ - -- I •
v ~
11 111

I IIIICJI I
I I I
I Vi ,.._ - ..,,.. I I
I I I
I I I \ I I
I I r_ I I
- - - -
LINE OF EX STRUCT METALCLAD _ _j 4~TAL CLAD \_FINISH GRADE ~XISTING GRADE TO BE REMOVED WOOD DOORS 00D WINDOWS

WEST ELEVATION
SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"
11/10/2021 The Law Office of Julie M. Hamilton 16
-I
::r
rt)
r
ll)
~
0 =B
n
rt)
0 ---,.,
LC
ro·
s:

I
ll)
3 ......
0 ::, Changes
requested
from
Applicant:
• Increase the 2nd floor setback on the east side by 5 feet. • Remove the 2nd floor balcony in the southeast corner. • Modify the 2nd floor windows on the east elevation to eliminate views into the Carome property.
• Stay within the daylight plane on the east side of the proposed residence.
• Reduce the gross floor area by 400 sf to accommodate
the ADU.
11/10/2021 17
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # B.2.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: January 12, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Request for DRP and SDP to Add an Elevator to an Existing Condominium Development at 135
S. Sierra Avenue (Case #: DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Applicant: Las Brisas Homeowners Association;
Resolution No. 2022-007)
BACKGROUND:

The Applicant, Las Brisas HOA, is requesting City Council approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SDP) to add an elevator to an existing condominium development at 135 S. Sierra Avenue. The property is located within the High Residential (HR) Zone.

The Applicant is requesting the approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SDP) to install an elevator for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access to existing condominium units. The maximum building height of the structure is proposed at 28.75 feet above the existing/proposed grade with the highest pole at 113.10’ MSL. A project in the HR Zone may increase the maximum building height to 30 feet pursuant to a DRP.

The issue before the Council is whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Applicant’s request as contained in Resolution 2022-007 (Attachment 1).

DISCUSSION:

The subject property is located on the west side of S. Sierra Avenue, south of Plaza Street and west of Sierra Avenue. The property is currently developed with a multi-family condominium development. The existing topography is moderately sloped upward from east to west. The proposed elevator project is proposed to improve resident, ADA and emergency access and is proposed to be located between existing Buildings 2 and 3 as shown on the following page.

January 12, 2022
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas Elevator

Page 2 of 6 ends

There will be approximately 45 cubic yards of cut and export for the proposed project.

The Applicant is also completing other façade/maintenance improvements that are not subject to discretionary review. The project plans are provided in Attachment 2.

Staff has prepared draft findings for approval of the project in the attached Resolution 2022-007 for Council’s consideration based upon the information in this report. The applicable SBMC sections are provided in italicized text and conditions from the Community Development, Engineering, and Fire Department are incorporated in the Resolution of Approval. The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the Public Hearing process.

If the Council determines the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.

The following is a discussion of the findings for a DRP and SDP as each applies to the proposed project as well as references to recommended conditions of approval contained in Resolution 2022-007.

Development Review Permit Compliance (SBMC Section 17.68.40):

A DRP is required for the following reason: 1) the maximum building height in the HR Zone is 25 feet, however, pursuant to a development review permit the maximum building height for the (MHR) and (HR) residential zones may be increased to 30 feet.

Building 1
Building 2
Building 3
January 12, 2022
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas Elevator

Page 3 of 6 ends

In addition to meeting zoning requirements, the project must also be found in compliance with development review criteria. The following is a list of the development review criteria topics:

1. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses

2. Building and Structure Placement

3. Landscaping

4. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking, and Storage Areas

5. Grading

6. Lighting

7. Usable Open Space
The Council may approve, or conditionally approve, a DRP only if all of the findings listed below can be made. Resolution 2022-007 provides the full discussion of the findings.

1. The proposed development is consistent with the general plan and all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance including special regulations, overlay zones, and specific plans.

2. The proposed development complies with the development review criteria.

4. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicant obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

If the above findings cannot be made, the Council shall deny the DRP. The following is a discussion of the applicable development review criteria as they relate to the proposed project.

Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses:

The property is located within the HR Zone. Properties to the south are also located within the HR Zone. Properties north of the subject site are located within the PI Zone and properties to the east are within the C Zone. The surrounding properties are developed with one and two-story, commercial and public/civic uses.

The project, as designed, is consistent with the permitted uses for the HR Zone as described in SBMC Sections 17.20.010 and 17.12.020. The property is designated High Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for multi-family residences developed at a maximum density of 20 dwelling units per acre. The proposed January 12, 2022
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas Elevator

Page 4 of 6 ends

development is not increasing the unit density of the site and therefore could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant would be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of Building or Grading Permits. Staff has been advised that the Applicant has already received preliminary approval from Coastal Commission Staff for this project.

Building and Structure Placement:

Landscape:

The project is not subject to the water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter

17.56. According to SBMC Section 17.56.040, the regulations apply to modified irrigated landscaped areas that exceed 500 square feet. The Applicant is not proposing any new irrigated landscaping.

Grading:

The project includes grading in the amount of approximately 45 yd3 cut and export for the proposed elevator and landing areas. The proposed cut will provide greater resident, ADA and emergency access to Building 3 and the partially subterranean garage. Retaining walls are proposed adjacent to the elevator structure.

Lighting:

Usable Open Space:

The proposed project does not propose to change any of the useable open space on site, however, will provide greater resident, ADA and emergency access from Building 3 to the existing club house, pool spa and partially subterranean garage.

January 12, 2022
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas Elevator

Page 5 of 6 ends

Structure Development Permit Compliance:

The proposed structure exceeds 16 feet in height above the pre-existing grade; therefore, the project must comply with all of the View Assessment requirements of SBMC Chapter

17.63 and the Applicant was required to complete the SDP process. The Applicant had story poles erected onsite. A final Story Pole Height Certification was issued by a licensed land surveyor on October 19, 2021, which showed the highest story pole certified at 113.10 MSL and 28.75 feet above the proposed grade. Notices to apply for View Assessment were mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site, which established a deadline to file for View Assessment on December 16, 2021. No view claims were filed for this project. Therefore, if the Council is able to make the required findings to approve the DRP, the SDP would be approved administratively.

As a condition of approval, a height certificate prepared by a licensed land surveyor will be required prior to the framing inspection certifying that the tallest point of the proposed residence will not exceed 28.75 feet above the proposed grade and the highest point of the structure will not exceed 113.10 feet above the Mean Sea Level (MSL).

Public Hearing Notice:

Notice of the City Council Public Hearing for the project was published in the Union Tribune more than 10 days prior to the public hearing. The same public notice was mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project site on December 22, 2021. As of the date of preparation of this Staff Report, Staff has not received any official correspondence.

In conclusion, the proposed project, as conditioned, could be found to be consistent with the Zoning regulations and the General Plan. Staff has prepared draft findings for approval of the project in the attached Resolution 2022-007 for Council’s consideration based upon the information in this report. Conditions from the Community Development, Engineering, and Fire Department are incorporated in the Resolution of Approval.

Should the Council determine that the findings can be made to approve the project; the SDP will be approved concurrently with the DRP. The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the Public Hearing process. If the Council determines the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
January 12, 2022
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas Elevator

Page 6 of 6 ends

WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
∙ Approve Staff recommendation adopting the attached Resolution 2022-007. ∙ Approve Staff recommendation subject to additional specific conditions necessary for the City Council to make all required findings for the approval of a DRP and SDP. ∙ Deny the project if all required findings for the DRP cannot be made.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2022-007 conditionally approving a DRP and SDP to add an elevator to an existing multi-family residential development at 135 S. Sierra Avenue, Solana Beach.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2022-007

2. Project Plans
RESOLUTION 2022-007

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLANA

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT AND STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

PERMIT FOR AN ELEVATOR ADDITION TO AN EXISTING
CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT 135 SOUTH SIERRA AVENUE,

SOLANA BEACH
APPLICANTS: LAS BRISAS HOA
APPLICATION: DRP21-012/SDP21-014
WHEREAS, Las Brisas HOA (hereinafter referred to as “Applicant”) has submitted an application for a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SDP) pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and
WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on January 12, 2022, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found the project requested in the application exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the Public Hearing, and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

I. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

II. That the request for a DRP and SDP to install an elevator for ADA access to existing condominium units at 135 S. Sierra Avenue, is conditionally approved based upon the following Findings and subject to the following Conditions:

III. FINDINGS
A. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permit) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

I. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of SBMC Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance), including special regulations, overlay zones and specific plans.

Resolution 2022-007
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas – 135 S. Sierra

Page 2 of 9 ends

General Plan Consistency: The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City’s General Plan designation of High Density Residential, which allows for a maximum of twenty dwelling units per acre. The development is also consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

Zoning Ordinance Consistency: The project is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) (SBMC 17.20.030 and

17.48.040), which delineates Permitted Uses and Structures (SBMC Section 17.20.020) which provides for uses of the property for multi-family development. Further, the project adheres to all property development regulations established for the High Residential (HR) Zone and cited by SBMC Section 17.020.030.

The project is consistent with the provisions for minimum yard dimensions (i.e., setbacks) and maximum building height with a DRP.

II. The proposed development complies with the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section

The project, as designed, is consistent with the permitted uses for the HR Zone as described in SBMC Sections 17.20.010 and

17.12.020. The property is designated High Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for multi-family residences developed at a maximum density of 20 dwelling units per acre.

The proposed development is not increasing the unit density of the site and therefore could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan.

Resolution 2022-007
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas – 135 S. Sierra

Page 3 of 9 ends

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant would be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of Building or Grading Permits.
b. Building and Structure Placement: Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhances their intended use.

The Applicant is proposing to add an elevator to an existing multi-family development with the intent to improve resident, ADA and emergency access. The proposed additions to the existing structure, as designed, would be located within the buildable area. The proposed elevator structure will be located between Buildings 2 and 3 and will be approximately 19 feet from the southern, side yard property line. The minimum side yard setback is 5 feet and therefore the proposed project, as designed, meets the minimum required setbacks for the
property.
c. Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area. Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.

The project is not subject to the water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter 17.56. According to SBMC
Section 17.56.040, the regulations apply to modified irrigated landscaped areas that exceed 500 square feet. The Applicant is not proposing any new irrigated landscaping.
d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas: Any development involving more than one building or structure shall provide common access roads and pedestrian walkways.

Parking and outside storage areas, where permitted, shall be screened from view to the extent feasible, by existing
topography, by the placement of buildings and structures, or by landscaping and plantings.

Pedestrian, ADA and emergency response access will be
improved with the proposed addition by adding and improving pedestrian walkways. The proposed structure is at or below the existing structure heights and would be screened from view by existing landscaping and existing structures.

Resolution 2022-007
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas – 135 S. Sierra

Page 4 of 9 ends

e. Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving operations in connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.

The project includes grading in the amount of approximately 45 yd3 cut and export for the proposed elevator and landing areas.

The proposed cut will provide greater resident, ADA and emergency access to Building 3 and the partially subterranean garage. Retaining walls are proposed adjacent to the elevator structure.
f. Lighting: Light fixtures for walkways, parking areas, driveways, and other facilities shall be provided in sufficient number and at proper locations to assure safe and convenient nighttime use.

A condition of project approval requires that all new exterior lighting fixtures comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.
g. Usable Open Space: Recreational facilities proposed within required usable open space shall be located and designed to maintain essential open space values.

Resolution 2022-007
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas – 135 S. Sierra

Page 5 of 9 ends

All required permits, including a Structure Development Permit, are being processed concurrently with the Development Review Permit.

The Applicant is required to obtain approval from the California Coastal Commission prior to issuance of Building Permits.

B. In accordance with Section 17.63.040 (Structure Development Permit) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

The proposed structure exceeds 16 feet in height above the pre-existing grade; therefore, the project must comply with all of the View Assessment requirements of SBMC Chapter 17.63 and the Applicant was required to complete the SDP process. The Applicant had story poles erected onsite. A final Story Pole Height Certification was issued by a licensed land surveyor on October 19, 2021, which showed the highest story pole certified at 113.10 MSL and 28.75 feet above the proposed grade. Notices to apply for View Assessment were mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site, which established a deadline to file for View Assessment on December 16, 2021. No view claims were filed for this project. Therefore, if the Council is able to make the required findings to approve the DRP, the SDP would be approved administratively.

IV. CONDITIONS
Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicants shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

A. Community Development Department Conditions:

I. Building Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the architectural plans presented to the City Council on January 12, 2022, and located in the project file with a submittal date of January 3, 2022.

II. Prior to requesting a framing inspection, the Applicant shall submit a height certificate prepared by a licensed land surveyor prior to the framing inspection certifying that the tallest point of the proposed Resolution 2022-007
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas – 135 S. Sierra

Page 6 of 9 ends

residence will not exceed 28.75 feet above the proposed grade on the west elevation and the highest point of the structure will not exceed 113.10 feet above the Mean Sea Level (MSL) in conformance with the plans as approved by the City Council on January 12, 2022.

III. Any proposed onsite fences, walls and retaining walls and any proposed railing located on top, or any combination thereof, shall comply with applicable regulations of SBMC Section 17.20.040 and

17.60.070 (Fences and Walls).

IV. The Applicant shall obtain required California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval of a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption as determined necessary by the CCC, prior to the issuance of Building and Grading Permits.

V. All new exterior lighting fixtures shall be in conformance with the Citywide lighting regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060).

All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.

VI. Construction vehicles shall be parked on the subject property at all times feasible. If construction activity prohibits parking on the subject property, the Applicant shall ensure construction vehicles are parked in such a way to allow sufficient vehicular access on the street and minimize impact to the surrounding neighbors.

B. Fire Department Conditions:

I. OBSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION: All
roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width during construction and maintained free and clear, including the parking of vehicles, in accordance with the California Fire Code and the Solana Beach Fire Department.

II. ADDRESS NUMBERS/STREET NUMBERS: Approved numbers
and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate additional locations as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from either direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background and shall meet the following minimum standards as to size: 4” high with a ½” inch stroke width for residential buildings, 8” high with a ½” stroke for commercial and multi-family residential buildings, 12” high with a 1” stroke for industrial buildings. Additional numbers shall be required where deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear access doors, building corners, and entrances to commercial centers.

Resolution 2022-007
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas – 135 S. Sierra

Page 7 of 9 ends

III. CLASS “A” ROOF: All structures shall be provided with a Class “A” Roof covering to the satisfaction of the Solana Beach Fire Department.

C. Engineering Department Conditions:

I. The Applicant shall submit all applicable sections of a Standard SWQMP (previously known as the Standard Water Quality Technical Report or WQTR). Form is available for download on the City of Solana Beach's website at: https://www.ci.solanabeach.ca.us/index.asp?SEC=8ED8A8CE-3DCB-4D48-AF57- A96C42443CEA&Type=B_BASIC
II. Roof drains need to flow into landscaped areas or Best Management Practices (BMPs) before being collected and draining to the street.

Please show all roof drains (both existing and proposed) of the buildings on the Site Plan. Include locations of downspouts and show the direction of flow.

III. Construction BMPs and the general drainage pattern of the property need to be shown on the Site Plan.

IV. On the Site Plan, please clearly show the calculations for the existing and proposed pervious and impervious areas.

V. On the Site Plan, please provide width dimensions of South Sierra Avenue from face of curb to property line, from centerline of the street to property line, and the full width of the public right-of-way (as measured from property line to property line).

VI. On the Site Plan, please show and label, complete with dimensions as appropriate, all existing street right-of-way features including, but is not limited to, existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk, landscaping, concrete steps, street parking, and any existing utility structures such as street lights, drainage structures (i.e. inlets and outlets) and any utility boxes and pedestals.

VII. On the Site Plan, please provide dimensions of the existing curb cuts and driveway width as access to the property.

V. ENFORCEMENT
Pursuant to SBMC 17.72.120(B) failure to satisfy any and all of the abovementioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SBMC Chapters 1.1.6 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation Resolution 2022-007
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas – 135 S. Sierra

Page 8 of 9 ends

proceedings.

VI. EXPIRATION
The Development Review Permit and Structure Development Permit for the project will expire 24 months from the date of this Resolution, unless the Applicant has obtained building permits and has commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the application may be granted by the City Council according to SBMC 17.72.110.

VII. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney’s fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification.

In the event of such election, the Applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter.

However, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicant.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 12th day of January, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
Resolution 2022-007
DRP21-012/SDP21-014
Las Brisas – 135 S. Sierra

Page 9 of 9 ends

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
______________________________

LESA HEEBNER, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk

GENERAL NOTES

1. THE DRA½iNGS REFLECT GENERAL AHRANGEMENT, DESIGN AND EXTENT OF WORK AND ARE NOT TO BE SCALED FOR MEASUREMENTS, THE DRAWINGS ARE PARTLY 01AGRAMATIC ANO ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE AN EXACT REPRESENTATION OF F!ELD CONDITIO~iS OR TO SERVE AS THE CONTRACTOR'S SHOP DRAW1NGS.

2. AT AfN T!ME SHOULD CONDITIONS ARISE WHEREIN THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS ARE !N DOUBT, OR WHERE THE DRAWlNGS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER, OR \'frlERE THERE !S A DISCREPM'CY BETWEEN THE DRA\';1NGS AND FIELD CONDITIONS, THE AHCH!TECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT ONCE FOR ClAAIFlCATlON. 3 ·rnsrn,::;•. ·.--1-·. "SIZE TO m· AND S!~,IJLA.R P!-t9ASES REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO ~FY ANO COOPil:HATE DIME~IOHS AHO CONDITIONS INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS WliH THE ACTU,l,l FIELD CON9ITIOHS. llSCAEP..W::IES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR DIRECTION ON HJWTO PROCEED.

4. OlMENSl:::JNS SHO'WN ARE TO FACE OF STUD UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL. PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR EOUJPMENT ANCHORAGE, HVAC.

PLUMBING, LIGHTING. COMMUNICATION. AND DATA AND POWER REQUIREMENTS

6. THE ARCHITECT AND OWNERS' CONSULTANTS SHALL HAVE NO RESPONS!S!UTY FOR THE OlSCOVERY. PRESENCE, HANDLING, REMOVAL OR DISPOSAL OF OR 8POSUR£ OF PERSONS TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN AUYFORM AT THE PROJECT S!TE, 11-lCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ASBESTOS, ASBESTOS PRODUCTS, POLYCHLORINATED BlPHEt.rYL {PCB) OR OTHER TOXIC SUBSTANCES.

7. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT OWNER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY RESTRICTION Of 0\1/NER ACCESS OR UTILITY OUT AGES. AUTHOR1ZATION FROM OWNER TO BE RECEIVED !N WRITING

8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY All DlMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. AT Afll TIME SHOULD Afll CONDITIONS ARISE WHEREIN THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS !S IN DOUBT OR \'/HERE THERE !SA DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND FIELD CONDITIONS THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED !MMED!ATELY ltJ ¼'R!T!NG FOR CLARJFfCATION.

9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE FULL RESPONS!BlLITY AND CHARGE OF ANO SHALL SE RESPONS!8LE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES. SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES, FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS !N CONNECTION W!TH THE WORK_ FOR THE ACTS OR OMtSSIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTOR OR ANY OTHER PERSONS PERFORMl~iG Aff( OF THE WORK OR THE FAlLURE OF N4Y OF THEM TO CARRYOUT THE ¼'ORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
10, THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. SAFETY o::: ALL PARTIES PRESENT ON THE JOS SITE IS SOLELY THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. 1 L THESE DAAWINGS AAE FOR PERMIT O~LY. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS AESPONS19L£ FOR All ADDITIONAL OET AILS ANO REQUIRED COORDINATION DUAi~ CONSTRUCTION

FIRE NOTES
1 FIRE OEPAHTMENT FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED. SCHEDULE ALL !NSPECT!ONS 2 DAYS !NAOVN4CE 2 LOCATIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS Of FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN ACCOFOANCE WITH THE CAUFO?i~lA FIRE CODE STANONIO 10•1 JHJ PLACEMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL. Of THE FIRE IPf)PfCTOO 3 STORAGE, DISPENSING OR llSE OF ANY FLAAOMBLE Nm C™BUSTIBLE LIQUIDS, FL.A.1,0.A>ft..E N;O COIAffiESSEO GASES, .-I.NO OTHER HAZAAOOUS MATEAW.S SHN..l C~PlY WITH UtlFOA~ FIRE CODE REGULATIO~- TH:: STORAGE ~DUSE OF 1-WAADOUS MATERIALS SHALL Be. APffiDi'ED BY THE FIRE AUTHORITY PRIOR TO Nff MATERIALS BEl~ STORED OR USED@SITE. A SEPARATE PLAN SUBMITTAL lS REOU!RED PRIOR TO THE STORAGE AND USE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 4 PLN~S OF NEW OR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING RAE PROTECTION, DETECTION, ALNU,4 OR MONITOOltli SVSTEM(S) St-W..l BE .A.PPAOVEO BY THE FIPi OEPAAH,1ENT PRIOR TO INSTAL.LATlot~ ASEPAAATE PLAN SUBMITT A!.. NW APffiOV-'l BY THE FIRE DEPARTMHH lS REQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEII.EN'f OF WORK 5 PRCMDE 2A 10BC MINlMUM RATED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS TO BE LOCATED ON EACH FLOOR WITHIN 75 FEET MAX. OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM ALL AREAS

6. OR.A.PES N-l!) OTHER DECORATIVE MATERIALS SHALL BE FLAME RETAflDM-IT CER.TfACAT!ON THEREOF SHALL 3E PROVIDED EXITS, EXII SIG~S. FIRE At.AflMSTATIONS HOSE CABl~ETS ANO EXTltliU!SHEA LOCATIONS Stw..l ~OT BE CONCEALED SY OECORATNE MATERl-'lS
7 ALL INTERIOR FINISHES SHALL CONFOMM WITH THE TITLE 24. CCR. CHAPTER 42.

PAC.

OCEAN

VICINITY MAP
y
% II j
1 1 J 1(
/(
/i
II I)
J/

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
BUILT

PROJECT

ADDRESS
APNNO.

LEGAL

DESCRIPTION
ZONE

OVERLAY ZONE
USE
# UNITS

LOT SIZE

LOT COVERAGE
F.A.R.

THE PROJECT HAS TWO COMPONENTS·
A. NEW ELEVATOR TO BE INSTALLED FOR AfJA ACCESS TO EXISTING CONDO BU!LDING 3.

1. EXTERIOR STUCCO - TO MATCH EYJSTING EXTERIOR STUCCO.

2. NEW ENTRY TRELUS FOR ELEVATOR ENTRY. EXPOSED MATERIALS FOR TREWS TO SE ROUGH SAWN AND STAINED mo SEALED PER OWNERS SPEC'S.
3_ BUlilNG W>J..KWAYS ANJ TERRACES- RESURFACE THE M:WBT\IOGE AREAS WITH .-1.N AESiH:TIC.

WATERPROOF SURFACE F!HiSH MATERIALS.
( GUARDRAILS - NEW WALKS A."lO CONNECTIO~S TO CONOOl.llHIUM TERAACES WITH GLASS RAIUNGS OR A COMB!HATION OF GLASS PANEL ANO.{IR CABLE A>JL.S.

5. ROOFING - NEW TO MATCH THE EXlSTING COMPOSITION ASPHALT SHINGLES CLASS "A" F.R. WITH NEW FASCIA'S. COPPER FLASHING AND A NEW GUTTER AND

DOWNSPOUT SYSTEM,

6. ELEVATORS - NEW TO MATCH EXlSTING ELEVATION INTERIORS

7. NEW RETA1N!NG WALLS {PER STRUCTURAL DETAILS) TO CREATE THE SPACE FOR THE

ELEVATOR AND ENTRY AREA

8. REMOVAL OF EXlSTING 2 BR!OGES/ACCESS BU!LDING 3.

B. MISCELLANEOUS UPGRADES AfiO M001HCATIONS
THE MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS ARE ANClllARY TO THE MA!N REMDDEL SCOPE AND CAN BE ADDRESSED BY EXISTING VENDORS OR NEW VENDORS. THESE ITEMS ARE: SECURITY AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS. FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM AND SIGNAGE. AND POST REMODEL USE AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL($} A!\'D PROCEDURES
THE PROJECT WAS BUILT !N 1974 {ACCORDING TO ASSOC!Al!ON RECORDS.) 135 S. SIERRA AVENUE
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
298-010•54SUB!D01-36
NOTE: EACH SUB 10 INCLUDES AN UNO 1/36 INT IN COMIJ.ON AREA LOi 1 OF LAS BRISA.$, IMP~- 7~'l IN THE CITY OF SOL,WI. BEACH, COUNTY OF S.-1.N DIEGO, S1 ATE OF CAUFORN!A. ACCORDltli TO THE WP THERECf FILED IN THE OF ACE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. STATE OF CAllFORNlA 00 AUGUST 9, 197_.

H!GH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
HILLS!DE / COASTAL. BLUr'F
FLOODF'lAIN 100 YEAR FLOOD -ZONE\IE
RES IDENTlAL CONDOM!N!UM
36 2-205ACRES
33,913 S.F. / 102,136 S.F 33 2% LOT COVERAGE

0.75 SETBACKS GENERAL SETB"-CKS: OESliNATlON 1)'
FROtH·25'-0"
SIDE:5'-0"
REAR· 0'-0" (FROM TOP EOGE OF CO.-l.STN.. BLUFF)
NUMBER OF 3 STORiES

STORIES
HEIGHT 25'-!J' MAX HEIGHT (30'-0' W/ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT) OCCUPANCY RESIDENTIAL- TYPE R-2
TYPE OF V-B (NaN-SPRINKLERED)

CONSTRUCTION
PARKING SPACES 72 PROVIDED C2 LOADING SPACES 4 GUEST PARKING S~ACES FLOOR AREA EXJST!NG INTERIOR FLOOR AREA TO REMAlN. NO CHANGE. EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS ONLY

GOVERNING
CODES
THESE PL.ANS .A.NO ALL WORKSHN..L CO~PLYWITH SO~A BEACH MUNICi?Al CODE. lHE 2019 E01llOH OF THE CN.IFORNtA BUILDlHG CODE FOUND IN STATE OF CAI...IFOANIA TITLE 2_. CCR AS

WENDED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
lHE 2019 EOl110NS OF THE CALl~ORNiABUlLOING CODES SHALL APPLY •2019 CAUFORN!A BUILDING CODE
•2019 CALIFORNIA GAErn BIJilfl~li CODE
•2019 CAUFORNIA HISTOR:CAL. 8UILOING CODE
•2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC~ CODE
•2,)19 CALIFORNIA MECI-WilCAL COOE
•2019 CAU~O~~!A FlUlilS!NG CODE
•2Qtg CAUFOR~lA TITLE 2-<
•2019 CAUFOAN!A FlRE CODE

ARCHITECTS

PLUMBLINE DESIGN
4615 WINNEBAGO AVE.

SAN DIEGO, CA. 92117
P: 619-884-9229
[email protected]

CTA ARCHITECTS

JAMES CUMMINGS AIA
310 VIA VERA CRUZ #206
SAN MARCOS, CA. 92078

GOVERNING AGENCY
City of Solana Beach
635 S. Hwy 101
Solana Beach, CA 92075
(858) 720-2400
www.ci.solana-beach.ca.us

MEP ENGINEER

JULIAN'S DESIGN

JULIAN OROZCO
925 8 TH SUITE 300
SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

QUALLS ENGINEERING

BRAIN QUALLS

PROJECT INDEX
T1.0 COVER
TOPO MAP 1 OF 2 SHEET
TOTPO MAP 2 OF 2 SHEET
A0.0 SITE PLAN
A1.0 PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A2.0 PROPOSED 1st FLOOR PLAN
A3.0 PROPOSED 2nd FLOOR PLAN
A4.0 PROPOSED 3rd FLOOR PLAN
A5.0 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
A6.0 PROPOSED PERPECTIVES
A7.0 ELEVATIONS
T1 .0 44403 MANCHESTER AVE. #203
ENCINITAS, CA. 92024 ATTACHMENT 2

SITE NOTES

1. SUflfACEWATERSHAU.DR.1,INAWAYFROMnt:BUILD!NG

2. 11-tlSP!\OJECT SHAU. COMPLY'NITHTITlE 24ANO 2019 CBC. UMC,UPCt. CEC

3. NO H.1lNUJOUS MATERIALS SHM.l BE STOA ED N«l/Oil USED IN TI-£ 8U1LDIHG IH EXCESS 0F111EOU~ITESUSTT:Dt1CBCT.IBLES•.O.'«l4B

4. AU EHTRANCES N«l H.1. EXTERIOR GROUNO FLOOR ElOT DOORS TO BILOING ANO FACIUTlES SHAU. BE MADE ACCESSABLE TO PERSONS WITH OIS>&JllfS 5 THERE SHAU. & LEVEL NfJ ctEAA FLOOR OR I.A'()ING OH EACH SOE Of A DOOR. Tl-£ LE\fl AA EA SHALL HAVE ALEHGTH IN THE DF;ECTIOO Of DOOR SWING Of AT LU.ST 60' N(J THE LENGTH Of'POSITE Tl£ DIRECTION OF DOOR S'MNGOF 48' >S ME>SURfDAT RIGHT NlGU TOM f'I.NcE OF Tl£ DOOR IN rrs CLOSED POSrTIOH AT Tl£ BUILDING EliTRYWHERECURBR#APSAAELOCATED

6. VER FY LOCATION OF AU. \JTUTIES AHO STREIT NPR0'¥U,!ENTS PRIOO. TO CONSTRUCTION. 7 ll!ERf ARE NO BUS ORPUWCTRN5PORTATIONSTO?SA[).IAC£NTTOnE SITT POT
e PATHOFTRAVEL
POE PATHOFEGR.ESS
1 AM THE OESIGNER/TEtllNfl/OWN£R IN RESPONSIBLE CHN\GE OF TI-IS REMOO€L. niE FOLLOWING DEFIC\EKT ACCESS FEATURES 'o'iill./'Nll NOT BE MADE FULLY ACCESSIBLE >S PAAT OF llilS PERMIT PER THE N'PAOVED UNREASONABLE HAAOSHP EXE""110N FORM: ' (SEC
11~B.2.1EXCEP110tl1 ) ---
, »It Tr£ DESIGHEA/0\li'NER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF ntS TEN.INT IMPROVEMENT PRO.ECT, I HA\'E IUSPECTRI Tl£ SITE?REMiSES ~ OfTEIIIMHEO THAT EXISTING COtDTIONS 1w. IN Fllll COi.Ri.ANGE l'<'llli CUAAEHT SITT. ACCESSIBIUTY REWll\fMfNTS TO TI£ 00tHT P.EOUIRED BY u.w·
SIG _____ _
NM\E _____ _
'"' ------
, NA TIE OESIGtEPJOWNl:R IN RESPOHSieLE CHAAGE Cf ntS TENNfr IMPROVEJ.£NT PRO.ECT. I HAVE INSPECTRI Tl£ SITEPRfM!SES NlJ OETERMl!EO THAT EXISTING RESffiOOM(S)SERVIHG N\EA(S) OF ALTERATION ARE ACCESSIBLE ACCORDING TO CURRENT REOUIREJ.UfTS • SG. _____ _
NNAE _____ _
DATE _____ _

EXISTING (SF) PROPOSED (SF) FLOOR PLAN/ELEVATION KEY NOTES

NON-LANDSCAPING AREA
NON~RRIGA TED LANDSCAPE

IRRIGATED LANDSCAPE

WATER FEATURES

DECORATIVE HARDSCAPE

TOTAL LOT AREA

IRRIGATED LANDSCAPE

WATER FEATURES

DECORATIVE HARDSCAPE

AGGREGATE LANDSCAPE AREA
EASEMENT FD~ PUBLIC
PEDESTRIAN i ccESS TO PARK
66,053' SF.
10,000' SF.
20,500' SF.
0' SF,
0' SF.
96,053' SF.

AREA OF WORK
0' SF.
0' SF.
0' SF.
0' SF.
999' SF.
405' SF.
0' SF.
0' SF.
0' SF.
1404' SF.
[D (E}ACCESSlel.f,ATHCfT'AAVEI.

OVERHEAD CROSSWALK
TO BE REMOVED.

OVERHANG /
' )
0 1--------+--05•-10"----++--'--1

EXISTING CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX
BUILDING 3
3 STORY
;= >:r \ EASEMENT FOR fll..l BLIC ~ ·. RECREATIONAL USE \._ I
,~
co
,~
0::
l~ 0 Iv
L
-: NEW ELEVATOR PER DETAILS AND SPEC'S.

LINE OF NEIGHBORING
STRUCTUR~
b
0 ci
CY)
THE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK:

A. NEW ELEVATO R TO BE INSTALLED FOR ADA ACCESS TO EXISTING CONDO BUILDING 3.

USE
# UNITS

LOT SIZE

LOT COVERAGE
F.A.R.

SETBACKS

NUMBER OF

STORIES
HEIGHT
(E) OVERHANG

RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM
36 2.205 ACRES
33,913 S.f./ 102,136 SJ. - 33.2% LOT COVERAGE

0.75 GENERAL SETBACKS: DESIGNATION 'D'
FRONT: 25'·0"
SIDE:5'·0'
REAR: 4-0'-0" (FROM TOP EDGE DF COASTAL BLUFF)
3 STORIES
25'·0" MAX HEIGHT (30'·0" W/ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT) -- --
290.00'

EXISTING CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX
BUILDING 1

SOLANA BEACH PARK
-----

EXISTING CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX
BUILDING 2 (E) STAIRCASE--1--~ 1~----+-- (E) ELEVATORS
1,,---,,--- (E) STAIRCASE
5' SIDE YARD SETBACK
248.00'
i .. \ ........... ····· ,., • • •••••• ••• .-· --·····, , , •••••••••••••• j --
\
'
I
'
\
'
\
'
I
'
I
\
'
I ----7 ' L---1------,1
'
I
' I
I
I
\ w
> ' <S:

ICD
I
_J
\~
\ ex: , !=:! I w
' Cl)
\
'
j,
I
'
\
'
\
'
I
'
\
'
\
'
I
'
I
'
I
'
\
'
I
'
\
'
I
'
\
'
\
I
'
I
'
I
'
I
'
1 I
'
I
'
I
'
I
c:::l
_J
o._
:a:
co
(/)
,<(
-,I
~ z !;;,
0 ~
"'
Io
ji
~
0 ~ !;;, cl
i's
~
::,-
~~
. _V> "'7
~gN
00 1-~0 I
0 LJ

SECTION
SCALE-1/8"--Hr
(N) STEP WALL PER STRuCTUIW. PLAN.
[
•
•

IE)STAJRS
iN) iURF AAEA
05'SF.

FC 76.00
(E) ELEVATOR I
T
' 1q Cot. UMN~
~ .'.

IE) WAL'fflAY FF86,08'
(N) CO."IC. (a}1st FLOOR

IN) APPROACH
(N) CONC.

FC 64.1 794 s~
(El WAf.rN/AY
BUILDING #2
BUILDING #3

FOOTPRINT
([)COLUMN~
TYP. 'a
Nf:N ELEVATOR PER DETAILS AND SPEC'S

IN) TRELLIS
PER STRUCTURAL PLAN.

TWBt.00
FC 76.30'
{N\STEPW>l.l
Pi:R STRUCTUAAL PL~.

IN) APPROACH
(NJ CONC.

FC 76.3D'
0 0
•

WALL LEGEND
~ZrlWlL
IIIIIJlIIlIIJ 2ii \'All
~ ~~~sr;r;·~\.AOO-lfOOOCfAA.S
~
Tlt:Pl.'1Al[l,IN.lc~l!ES8'AAAT!Ofl\:J.11H:twE1.L1;,w•Ahtln ATTJ:AllASl'M&.1/~tfAIMal.lMl,'1-f;MlJW!IOl.'CI.V"'HlT0THE"-':- AliEUl"[IIC!CECllCll(.l(l
illlii 12'CM!JWAUl'ERSTfllJCT11?.Af.OESt.iN
z=lZ SOFf!TABO','ff'.EfEilTOflOO'li'WlfOl!HE!GHTAH

GENERAL NOTES
Ffl£9'1'.l!iflli\SY51!MS
Al.lJ(J.l1m:: fll: •l'NlEl snmn 11-W.L& JIM.I.ED fl ACCClll,l,NCE ..-w CIC' crcst:c:n;:m$1CJ1J11:1111•1•
AUTIMI.TJ:FlifSPAIPllll$'rs:rE:W~QW.LlfJIIU.1t.tro•i1.cc(JQl.lu~:«t1:1cw O'CW:CfDIC$11Jl(Tlf\tlt:ll(1
F!REALA?USYSTEMS
~I Gl1ot!? R OMSl-:itt 2 OCCU?AflOfS. THEAUTOII.ATIC FFJ; Ai.AisM Si'STEM SYSTEM sw.lL BE ~lSTAUEOIIIACCOi'.!WlCfWSECHONW72i SMOKEOf!ECTOOS
SMIJP'fDETEO'OURvt.Ll!Em:J.1,I.LEO,i,1,ccani1,HCE'IIIITHc:eCO'C~CllCHi 1071112TH!IJ.12J1l
SWOO OO[Cl(II; l'O'.llll !;QQ; TH! l'IIW;'!' l'OWEI\ IUCE fCII TIIE CVECHIII ~ll!EAlt.lJTtfll~,,wu,1;.M11W.LlffUl'f:O•THMTTEIIYl,l.ll'U" !:MH\GHIC'!'ES"'..A!'fANORESCUt
l.lfAISIYEIIIIEUSI-W.LIEIIACClll)~C1'ill'IHCICllCl"IOi1c,i111,l,[[ID/TO Ttt:WfM'SIY[allllltOIIIIDllrCl!ICCIMEI 1~, l'ICIA:SOISVW.lll!~Hfl EWIIQJICfEst;llt•Dl'l""llli,lCU'lOCOJn.111~11,1,,amflSNOSUEl'lillil

11.COISIELIMTllEFUTH STIJIY AIIMWDEQW.tHAit:-UIDST IXM 'Mt:l:E e,&..tlMOOSCOliMl (II; llll.llJE SlEEl'lolii lOCl,IS, fJ.0'8/Cf[~[,'.ljOIUa.f Cfi: .. !l" Qt,l,l.l IE JIE(J;ll'iD,_. £AO! R.EEP11' II.COi. M 9W.l. HOT ll •a.w!!:D* .r.D.Ql., ... ~s Cfllf. MSEI.IEIIT $00-t Cf'f:•u QV,l.L Cl'IJI Dlllf.CfLYIIT0A M- UC WAY Ill TO A Y,.,O Ill CWIT THAT CfBIS iO THE l'taJ;t,AY SHOWfllSMiDTUBES
TIE ii.All Cll',Ulll RV,tt IE C8,lftil "-AUEi'.. TLE lllM'l"'l.c,.'EO [iJ.1,1,L I.WI n· AIO'i'£Tlf; tfal,,II AT THE SHOlll(U CJll. 'QJU M1H RiOWEI\S l'fl CIC llCT 121t2.l W>.1- El,l,l.S ClH[l TIWI '1U::lJl,l;l Elfl.lE.TS Sl'Wl II( MClff\l!tf-ll~S!STAUf lillJ.'5 ENa.O:.I DCU~N() l',l,HHS loalSl. l,l,lllfD CATE DY 11. CO:.S MUST lw.llQ CJ.R". Wl,ID 1U >lfA IY SHJ'!illll lfCE.l'Tlll TO EJ/Ctll.l~A$SA !l'IWETEl CII.Q.! CtllOO.. 'f,ll','U fCII. ~MIIS ..r•mn.111~0',it[l C01,18/~f0l W:U:.:f!f Pl£SSl.lf. eMJ,!;CEOfl'Qifll,IOSTAl(:UCQ;,vl(•,uroCl'cR:CTDlml
f'ENETAAHOOS
OOVE!/1$ AfiO OOCTS PHifTTll.T"lNG TH:: WAI.LS OR cai.ITTGS st!'AflATING TH£ O'WEUING IJNITFl10Mn!f11J,MG£SHAt.lBf.ZfiGA::11mMETALOROmrnAf'PROVfDAs:;El»'..lY flR£S£PAMTIONII-EASlJR£S
W~U#(J ctUICiS lfl'"'[!Jj IWl'll Nlt 11"-!Llfl\1 RVi..l !!IE CVt.EDlO LUT ~ llD';'[l,l(lfTl'£~A~,11-111l$fCfJ::t1,, 11.I.COOIO!ITOflt::ZPMY.l"Ot 1,1(.1,StlU CCM.f.DL
Q?.CU.:OfLCO'i
fflSlflCO
RCctlOR.Cl)II
ll-itoA.00~
Tl'IWS
TO~Al
COMM!RClAL!iOltS
2es ~on 100:;on
liltlOfT
10HOTT ..,~

USS-OFT
UfO!lflOOftl'.AITANYCOMMHlCALS!'ACtOOORMIJST NOTEXCEE05/'!M-,;)S CBC 116-40~29 ACCfSsa£8illi.llctS
l • aIAA~ltlEi'El. U,/O.,Al l'll.l SO: (J0Ml.£lf» OOCf!:OTOOOU(lf\A.L 'l'IIJTII CF Sfl(JIXl.let£1£1,fOOJ'i,ro•FULLWlllOU0[l'flt
2 •o..fAAAfltlfltlOOtllOltU,/ltW,ATl'LUSU0FS.a[lWOOlllT0OOEUDfll.ll'IIOllt(J srr IY s:milf lUf OOCll 1'1.WSNI AOOTIC,lJ.l 2~ rlO!ES-:tl-.. '(ITH IIEYCl.tl STlltl fDli,{ CF 0CO'i FCIA.l.LIIJIIO-IE$Um1-1r:,L,1J01\1
3 ~ CliAfl Alf.) LH'El E:<ll!OOR WiDlNG Wi'iAUS ti OTTO EX:CHD2 0 rrnw;r SLOi'E INA!fl' 08.ECTIO!i 4 •OOE1.:01.L1.ti.i,iSVlf,',CfSTOl!IEATH"As:TASRJPlfSls::T.I.NTASAM!IIU,IS,1,1,ll:Ofl,SJl 5 • OWllif ll LMl l!IT'lt,W11 l),,l[Jlt,;Al(J OOOI': 111'.!!lG.0 TO UOT 0:ct:ED 1/2 l'ICJU II HH\iil-fi 1IIIITHW:lll(:;f,l.Sll'fAct,1r:i11.1o'lTW.Hn•o-m•11f.1QiT C8Cta1, 11·"-""2~ 111!--lOl £ ~AruwrmooooosmEWO!'ITlOOffMTETI1EDOORSMU~TNOlEXCEtD8Sf'001-iOSfO!lOOH\lOO OOOil5A~D5/'001f.lSf0RmlfRJOfl000RS CSC 1132AS
7 ~ Ai umr TWO 000/l.S Pf\O''ll{)f IB'ER HAROWAF.f CBC 11:m 8 1132A 9

FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES
[TI ~~1~i~iJ5Li!¥ ~l:i~ii:iE~T~!~~~~~~~r~12il-WM£ ™ PATED [I] ~~f;:~~}::::~~~i\!l~~:iri~:~1?c:;i ~~; W"~X
[!Jtl!IEOfFLOORSEWiV
[Dv-1EOFC(O'.AeOVE
[DuuEOffl001A&o'tf.
0 rt~~:~~~i!Wt~ci;tr~M1!l!f •~t~~~irtJ,.m
c::::l
__J
o_
I
LJ
C
®
0 SECTION
SCALE-1/ff'• l-O"
[
.
r.--,
- tIi
[J
m COi.UM~
lYP. \, ·r
LJ I~ ST~RS
(E) Clll.UM~
lYP. :.

BUILDING #2
1st FLOOR
BUILDING #3 ----.._ 1st FLOOR
l
•
• •
✓
-r- -.
(~COi.UM~ ~/mcoLUMN TYP. I TYP.
. ------------
G
G

WALL LEGEND
~ b4 WAI.L
ITIIlIIlIIIIl 2l6 WAU
~ :~~::;·~&AO.G4fORCOAlS 1lfl'RNATEGI.AAGtSHAU.&SEP'AAATEOFI\OMTHED'MU.tiGUNITAHOIJS m::a:IIJl:D: ATTC~SYMEAHSOFAMitf.MIJM\J2·GYl'SUM80il.RDAPPL.EDTOTliEGAAAGESl>El'EIIC8CSfCT10NCDU41 ~ 1Z" CMUWAl.ll'EIISTllJcn.w.t.0(Sl6N
··'-•'t'r':''"':v.,r. SOFFlTA&M:: REFERTOFtOOR,~FORHEJGtfTA.f.F

GENERAL NOTES
flflESl'RH'.lERSYSTEMS
AUTIMI.TICFP.f Sl'll:NillASYSTEMS SHAU.&INSTAUEDIHACCOlllll.HCEWIDIC!C' a'CSECTIONSI03-3.1.1THi.1.190l5. AUTOMATIC FP.E S'..wlfR SYSTEMS SHALl. & INSTAI.LW 1M ACCOftll,l,HC£ \llffil C8C/ O'CSECTlONS!i034nl\U903.4 1 fllEM».MSYmMS
IN GRCU'IICt.1SICltl2 OCCUl'ANClS, TllEAUlOMATICfllEAU.AAI SYSTEM SYSTEMSHAU.&E INSTAU.EOINACCONJ,1,HCEW/SECTION907.2.9
SMl'.lKEOETECTORS
SMOKEOfTECTORSSHAU.& INSTALLEDINACCOl'IOANC£Wl'THC&CICFCSECTIOHS 9072.11 .2THNl901.2.1U.

SMOODETECTOR~OWt:IISOURCf.TMEl'!l».WIYNJ'i'r'EIISOUIICf.FORTHEDETECTORS SHAU. & F!IOMllf ButDING~G. L!IJT SHAl.l&E EOl.lll'l'EO'MTh MlTEf!'f!Aet.Lf EMERliOfCYEsr»EANORESCUE
MEAHSOFEGRESSSHAU.8EINACCORONICEl'o1THC8CSECTIOHl0301. INAOO'OOHTO Tl£MEAHSOFEGAESSI\E0IIF.ED8YC&COWTEft 10 rRIMSIONSSIW.L&w.ct:FOII EMER!.EHCY Esr»E AHO RESOJE 1H GIIOLP II OCQ/~AHC(S !ASOIOOS AHO SUEPING I\OOMS9£l.OWTHEfOUIITH STORYA!OVEGAAOE SHAI..LKAVEATLfAST<H 00 'M£IIE !ASEMOOS COHTAH Off: Ofl MORE Sl.fEflHG ROOMS. EMERGENC't ESWE AND P.!:SCUE Of'ENINGSSHAU.!!£1\EtxMEDINEAOiSlEEflHGROCN,WISHAll.HOl!ll:REllll\fDIN AOJOIN INGAIIEASDFTHE!IASEMEHTsuotOl'EH'.HGSSHALLOf'ENDIRECTlYIHTOAl'V!ILICWAY OflTOA YARD OR ctllf!TIBAT Of'EHSTOTHE ,ueuCWAY SHOWl:RSOOT\lefS
Tlf\t,'AllCOl,'EIIINGSHAll& CEMfHTl'IASTER. TlEOflAPl'R!MDEOUAL.MiH n•A· &CM:TlfDAAIIATTHESHO',',OSORTIJ!S'MlHSHQ'l,"ERSmle&cSECT 1210.2.3 W.T• EIIAI.SOTHERTHAH STRUCTl/lW.El.fMfHTSSHAUIIE l.lllSTW..flESISTAHT. Gt.ASS EH· Q.OSUII.EOOOfl.SANOPAHELSMUST!ll:IMEU:OC4TEGOlff11. 000RSMUSlSWIIGOUT- WMO HETAAE>.OfSHO'li'ERJIEWTOflTOEHCOMrASSAlO' DWliTEllaRa..E. a»m!Cl. VALVESfOfl SHOW'ERSAMJ ~<MtJI cou,NAllOH MUST !If l'RESSUIIE IIAI.AHCl:OflTHEIIMOSTAT1ClillQHGYA1.VESl'ERCl'CSECTlON'0U

PENETRATIONS
AlffVEHTSAHO OUCTSl'ENETRATIHGTHEWAU.SORCEJ..lffliSSEl'AIIATIHGTtE ~!HG UHflfROMTHEG.W..GESliALI.IIE26C.,.,.SHEETr.ETA1.0flOTHERN'PRCMDASSEMal.Y f1AESEPAR,'1IOHMEASORES
WAUSAHO(tlJNGS~ENGAAAGfANOCYM:ll.WiGSHAll.!11:SEAUOTOUMITAII MMMEHT l'ERASHRAE 52.2-2013 SECTION 6 S. IH AOOIT10H TO Fl\£ S£PAIIATIOH ..,,..,, """""'" ~OUNDflOOfl. ,,srn00<
SECONOflOOfl..

THIROFLOOR.

TRflUS
TOTAL
COMMERCIAi.NOTES
205SO.n
1otSOR
100SO.FT
100SO.FT
380'SOTT
usso.n
EfFOflT TO OPERATI W COMMtRCW. S,ACE DOlll MUST NOT EXCEED 5 P~S. C9C 11&--404.2 t ACCESSl!UENTWCt'S
1 • QIMANOL.fln LANOOIGAT PUil SIDE OF OOUBI.ELW OOOflS TOOOENOflU WllTH OF SET OF OOU!I.E UAf DOORS FOR AJll iO NOiESOEl'TH
2 • CUARANOLEVEI. EXTEIIICfllAHOIHGAT rut.LSO:OFSW(lELEAfOOOATOEXTEh'OFUll WllTHDF SET OF ~GI.E l£Af DOOR rtUS AH AOOOIONAI. 24 INQiE$.IN.Yt'llJH 8EYONO STIU{E EDGE OF OOOII f(lfl FIA.l Ml INQ!ES WTH OF l.AH!lh'G
3 •o..fMAHOLEVEI.EXTEfllOIIWID!HGSURfAC£SNOTTOElaE020PERC£HTSLOl'EIN>JNOII\ECT10H 4 • EXTEIIIOR w«>ING S1JPiACES TO DEAT HAST AS SUP IIESISTAHT ASA MEOIIJM SAi.TIO FIH!SH 5 • OWIGEIHLEVEL!rn'r'EENLAl():IIGAtllDOOIITII\ESttelD T0NOTEXCEED1/2tll'.lfSIHHEICitT 'MlHWITICAl. SllllfACt'SNOTMOPJ:THAN 1/•IHC!lES INrl:IGtiT CIIC 10051.5, 11+40424, 118-303 6 •ATUNfTTW"OOOORSTHEEffOflTTOOl'ERATETHEDOOIISMUSTNOTEXCEEOISrOUIIDSfOflEXTEIVOFI DOOflSANDS~OJNOSFOIIMEll!OflDOOIIS. C&C1132A.6
7•ATUNITTWOOOORSl'RIMJEU\'UIHAIIOWAAE.C&C1132A.1113ZA.!

FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES
GJ ~~~0~~=~~~"3ti.~~:'{~~20•MiNVTEFI\EMTEO
0 rr:;=g.~:i~:~~\:~sf::~QA~~T~~~::S l/2' 1W:
0 LINEOffLOOll!!ELOW
0UNEOF0£0:AWIE
[DUNEOFFlOORMIM
0 5i=~¥srJsS'i:&~~1HE~~~~JEN
A ffi
NPRsc9c:i/8~?"ED 1st FLOO R PLAN
c:::)
_J

0....
~ ~
0 z !;;, \,I !.' ,. '-' ;:;
0 5
"' -,j_
! !:c
iii
I w~
~~ 00
1-~; 0 I
TOP 111.0'
©
SECTION SCALE-1/8"- 1•{1'
[
I
BUILDING #2
2nd FLOOR
® 0
/
BUILDING #3
2nd FLOOR
1~com.1~ ~/(~COLUMN lYP. 1 lYP.
. -----------
G

WALL LEGEND
2-'WALL
JililIIIIIII] 2i6 V.'All
~ ONE-HOORPA!ITYWAU
REFERTOSHEE'TAD.03 &AO.~fOilDETAl.S
M l'RNAIT lW',,\G£ SHAU & SEPAAATED FROM TliE OWEUIHG UNIT ANO ITS IIIlil:l:IIllI! ATTT;AIV,BYMEANSOfl-.MJ(MUM 1/2' G'l'PSUM 80W>Al'P1.IEDTOTHE 6'11· AGfSO::PERCZICSECTIOH~OS.Hl
~ 12' CMUWALLPERSTFl!CTUIW.DESlGN •
.-?l.-.,~,.-~~...-,t: SOfffTAWJE.P.tfERTOFLOORPWlFORHEIWTA.FJ GENERAL NOTES fllESl'l\iHKI.E11SYST£MS
AUTOMATIC flRE Si'P.H':LEII SYSTEMS SHALL B€ IHSTAl.LED IN ACCOIIDAHCE WITH CBC' CFCSECTIONS903.3.1.1THRU90J.5.

AUTClAATlCFIIESl'ARKI..ERSYSTEMSSKI.Ll.&IHSTALLEOIIIACCOOl,l,HCf'MTHC8C' CFCSECTIOHS90HTHRU903.4.1.

Ff\EAI.ARMSYSTEMS
IN GnOOP R DMSION 2 OCCOPAllCl!:S. lHE AIJTOM,I..TlC FftE ALARM SYSTEM SYSTEM SHAU. & INSTAlLEOINACCOriONICEWJSECT10U907-2.9

SMOKE DETECTORS
SMOKE DETECTORS SHAU. & ~ISTAl.lfD IN Acca:IOANCE 'MTH C8C,'CfC 51:CTIOIIS 9072 11.2HiRU907.211.6 SMOKE DETECT(); POWER SMCE: THE PftMAAY PO'NER SOURCE FOR THE DETECTORS SHAU. & FIIOMTHf81.1!1.00lGWIP.fjG, l!t/T SHAU &EOl.1.Pl'EDWITH U TTDIYU.CIOJP EMff\GEttCYESWEANORESCUE
MtAHSOFEGRfSSSHALl&ltlACCOF.O,IJK:£1'1TIHC8CSECT!Qll10301.IHAODITIOHTO THEr.v.NSOFEGRESSREOUIIIED8YCl!CC!W'TEJl10, PRO'IISIONSSIW.l!IEMAOEFOR EMfflGOICYESWEANORESCUEIUGIIOOl'ROCOJPANCfS.l!A.SEMENl'SM'OSllEPNG ROOMS !!El.O'NIBEFOORTH S10RYAW/E GAAOE stW.1.HAVEATLEASTON::OOT 'n'HE!\E llASO.ffNTS CONTAIN Oflf OR MORE SllEP!NG ROOMS. EMERGalC'I' ESOO'EAHO I\ESCU£ Ol'EHNGSSHAI.Ll!EP.EOUIREOINEAOISI.E'EPIHGROOM.8UTSHAU.NOT&P.EOU'.REDIN AOJOIHINGAIUSOfTHEIIASEME/fl SUOIOPEN'.'lGSSHAI.LOPENDIREC'ILYllll'OAPUBUC WAY OR TOA YARD OR COURT THAT OPENS TO THE Pl/BUC WAY SHO'n'ERS>.HOTU&S
THE WAU COYEJWNG SHALL BE CEME/fl PLASTER. Tl.E OR Af'PRMO EQUAL MJ(, 72 ' A· IIOYETHECJV,IIATTiiESHOY.'ERSORTUBS'M'TliSHOYl'ERSPERC&CS!:CT. 1210.2.3. t.lAT• EIIALS OTiiER THNf STRlJCTUMI. ElfMtNTS SfW.L BE MOISTUP.E-1\ESISTAh'T GLASS EN• Ct.OSUIIEDOORSAIIOPAHElSMt/ST6EI.ABELfDCATEGORY11.000RSMUSTSW.NGOUJ· WARO.HETAREAOfSHO'n'ERll:CEl'TORTOENCOMPASSA30"DIAMmRCIRCt.E.

COIITll<X.VALVESfORSHO'li'ERSAIIOTU!,'SttlMUCOM!IIIATIOOMUST!lf/'RESSUl'.E IIAI..ANCEORTHERMOSTATICM!l(f(GVALVESPERCl'CSEC'IKJl~OU ffilETMTIONS
AIIYVENTS ANO DUCTS f'ENETAATlllG THE WALl.S OR CEUNGS SEPAR.4.TIIIG THE ll'l'r'EUJNG UNITFR<».ITHEGAAAGESHAllBE21i6'.SHEETM..'1AlOROTHEJIAl'PRCMOASS!:M!l.Y FRESEPARATlONMf.ASUAES
WALLSAIIO CEllNGS 6El'n'EEN GAAAGE ANO DWELi.iNG SHALL !IE SfAI.EO TO l.lM(f ,IJfl M0VEM€NT!'fllASHAAE62.2·201JSl:CTI0!/6.5,IHAOOITlllNTOFIRESEPARATION MEASURES.

CO!-J.MERCIAL
GROUHOflOOII
Flf\STFLOOI\
SECONOflOOR
THIROFLOOII:

TIU:WS:

TOTAL

CWME/ICIALNOTES
2tl5SOH
1oo·so.n 1oo·so.n lOOSO.fl
390•so.n
sas·so.FT
EFFORT TO O!'fRAlt:AIIY COMMlRCIAl SPACE COOR MUS1 NOT EXCEEDS POUh'OS. CBC I 1~042.9 ACCESSll!tEENTIWICES.
1 "ct.EAAAIIOLEVEl.LANOINGATPllJ.SIDtOfDOU!ll.flEAFOOORSTOEXTtNOFULLWIDTHOf SET Of OOU&.E l£AF DOORS FOR Nll 60 ~'CHES DffiH
2 "Ct.EA/IANOLEVELOOEIUORl..AOO~'IGATPUllSIDEOfSINQ.ELEAflXIMTOOOEHDfllJ.WIDTHOF SET OfstlGLE LEAF DOORPI.USANAOOOOIAL2~ INCHES-IN-WIDTH BE'l'OHOSTRl!(E EDGE OfDOOII FOflfLll.t601NCHESDEPTHOfl.ANOIHG
J • CI..EARANOLEVELOOflllORI..AHOIHG SURfACESNOTTOEXCEE020~£11CEITT SLOf'E INAHYDIRECTIO!I 4 • EXTENORWK>IHGSURFACES TO BEAT LEAST ASSU~/IJ;SISTANT ASAMEOOA SALTEDFlNISH 5 • CIWiG£WILEVEL8ETWEENI.ANDfl5ANDOOORTHRESliOI.O, TONOTEXCEED1/2NCHESIHHBGHT 'nTTHVEIITIQJ.SU!lfACESNOTMOIIETHAN1/41NCHESINHEKiHT rllClOO&l,5. 11-8-40424, 111!-303 6 • AT UNIT TWO DOORS lliEffFORT TO OPERATE THEOOORSMUSTNOTEXCEEOI 5~01.1NOSFOR EXTER.'O'I DOORSANOSPOU!«JSFORIHTEJl,IOROOClflS, C8C1132A.6
7 • ATUNrTTWOOOORSPfl{M()ELE\-{ftHAJIO'NAAE.C8C11l2A.l.11l2A.9

FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES
~ :~~o1~::~lf~~~ri.~~~~:.~20-MWTEFIIERATEO
OJ [~;:~11~i~:~~E~T~sfo~:~~~~~o:r~;:~~ 112· ~
0 UHE Of FLOOR BELOW
0tNIEOfOECl<iA80'/E
[DLNIEOfflOCIIIABOYE
0 ii;~=™~Jsi;U&~l~~~~~~~~JEN
0 FF 86.0~
©-
SECTION LJ SCALE-1/8" • 1-0'
[
(E)STAJRS
0 -- _ _, ___ ----- ------ -.--- ----
BUILDING #2
3rd FLOOR
BUILDING #3
3rd FLOOR
,0
G

WALL LEGEND
~ 21,(W>,U
IIIIIIIIIIIIl b6 W>.U.
~ ~!~~TY.:~lAD.!MFOFIOfTAlS
TitE l'PIIAT[ GARAGE SHAU. !IE SEl'MATEO FROM THE CMru.lltG UNIT AHO as Il[][][:J[J[I[ Am::AF£ABYMWIS0fA'4'f.MUMl/1' GYPSl/M~A!'PLIDT0IBfla'JI.

AGESClEPfllC!CSECTICtf41)6.3.4.1
~12' CMtJWAI.LP£11STFlJC!'U!W.CESIGI!
.:';\_ .. ~,_. .. ,!',-';(< sa'FITABl1t'E:RffEJITOFLOO'IPLANFOAl!ElGHTA.ff

GENERAL NOTES
FRESPM«I..ERSYSTEMS
AU'TOW.TICflP.ESl'I\INKUIISYSITMSSKAU.SEINSTALL.EOINACCOP.IWiCEV.'llHcaCI CFCSECOONSt03.31.1THIIU903.5. AUTOMATIC FIF\E SPAIUQ.EII SYSIEMS SHAU 8E IISTALUO IN ACCOROOICE 'MTH C&C/ CFCSECTIONS903.4llf\U903.4 1 fll.EALAAMSYSTIMS
II GIIOUI' 11 DM~ 2 OCCIHAHCES. TliEAUTOl,l,\nC Fw: AUJIM SYSTEM SVSTEM SHALl.!E IHSTAUfD IM Acr.oRIWICE w~cncw 907.2.9
SMOOOElECiOAS
SMOO DfTECiOP.S SHAU. et: IISTALUO IN ACCOROAffCE 'MTN C8C/CfC SECTIONS 9072.11.2TlillU9072.11.6
SMOO 0rrECTOII Pl7M:II SOOP.Cf: THE l'IUMARY l'!M'EII SOIMCE FOR lHE DETtCTOP.S SIW.J.SEFIIOMT1£e1A.DING\IMflG,IIUTSHAl.l.!IEEOUffED'MTHSA.TTERYU.tr.UI' EMEIIGEHCYESOOEAHDRfSCIJE
MEAHSOFEGRESS SHAU.& INACCOROANCEWITH C!C SECTION 1030.\ INAODITION TO THE MEANSOFEGll[SSIIEOUM) BYcecOWTER 10, PIICMSIOHSSHA!.L!E MADE FOR EUf!IGO!CYESOOEAND~SQJEINGIIW'IIOCOJPAHct:S IIAS£MOOSANOSUEP'IIG 1100MS9El.(7NlHEFIXMITHSTORYAWIEGAADESHALI.HAVEATID,Sl0tEOO 'NIOE MSEMENTSCOfflAII 011£ ORUORf SlfEl'IHG ROOMS. EMfRGEt.C't'ESCAPEAHDlit:SCIJE DPENINGSSHAll llE llfDlHREOIN EACH SlfEl"ING ROOM, eulsw.LL NOTIIE REOIMEDIN AOJOIHINGAll,l,SDFTHEMSEMtlll SUCHOPEN!NGSSHAUDPEN~CTLYINTDAM- LIC WAY OR TOA YNIO OR COURT T~T DP ENS TO THE PU!UC WAY SHO'll'ERSANDTWS
Tlf WAU CCMFrNG SHALL & CEMEl{J Pl.ASTER, Tlf ORAPPRc,,'ED EOIJAL M;N, n•AWlt THE MUI AT THE SHO'M:RS OR T\/8S \lltnl SHOW'ERS PER C8C SECI 1210.2.31MTEIW.SOTHERTH,1,NSTRUCTUIW.Elfl,lfNlSSHAll&UOISTIJl'lf-PlSISTAHI Gl.ASSEHa.OSUI\EDOORSAHOPAHEl.St.lUSTIIEL.W:U:DCATEGORY11. DOOIISMUSTS'MNGOIJT- WNW HET AIIEA OF Sl:1()\l,{R flECUTOR 10 ENCOMPASS A 30' DLWETER OR0.E.

COffTII.ClVAI.YESFORSHOYltRSANllrue,.,sH(J\l,'EIICOM!IHATIONUUSTIIEl'RfSSORE !WANCEORTHEP,MOSTATlCMOONGVALVESl'ERCPCSECTION4Dl.3
PENEIRATK»fS
AKfYEHTSANO OUCTSl'Eh'fTMrnG Hf WAUS OR CfUlGS SfPWTING Tl-f llMWIG UNllfROMi"HEGAMGESHAU&2'G4..SHE£TMETA1.0ROTltER.YPRc,,'EDASSEMBI.Y nu: SEPAMJlOH MEAstJRES
WAl.lSAND COONGS &TWEEN GA.",AGE AND Dl'ltLUHG SHAU & Sf.Al.ED TO UMlT NA MIMMElll l'ERASHIIAE 62.2-2013 SECTION 6 S. 1H AOOITION !Ofl\E SEP'Al'..\TION ""'"""
"""'""'' WIUffDFlOOII
fllSTFlDOII
SECOHDflOOII
i"HIRDFLOOll
TI<WS
TOTAL
205$0.FT
lO)'SQ_fT
1IXISO.FT
1IXISO.FT
'IO'SOFT
us· so.FT
COMMERCW.NOT'ES
EFFORTTOOl'ERATEAKrCOM.Y€RCW.Sf'ACEDOOIIMUSTNOTEXCHDSPOUNDSC8C118--4042_9 ACCESSl!C.EEHTMHCES
1 • ClfARANJLEVEl I.AIONGAT PW. Sl)f OF DDU&LELEAf DOORS TOEXTENDflA.I. Wlli"H OF SElOFDOU!ll.EtlAFDOORSFORA.IUMIINCH[SDUIH.
2 •QLIJIANJI.FVEl.EXTEltORLAHDIHGATPUl.tSIDEOFSINGtELEAFOOOIITOOOENDfl.lUWl)THOF SElDFSIMGl..ELEAFOOORl'l.USAIIAOOITlONAl.2• IHOiES-IN-\li'l)JHBEYOODSTRlif[DGEOFDDOII fORfl.UMIIHCHESDEl'i"HOF!.,VOHG
3 •ClfARANJI.FVEl.EXTERlORLAHOIHGSOllfACESNOTTOEXCEED2.0PERCEliTSLDPEINAKfOP.ECTION • • EXTERIOl'l WIOIIG SUF.fACES TO llE AT UAST AS SUP RESISTANT ASA MEOOM SALTED FHSH 5 •CHAHGEINlfVEL&TVl{ENIANOIIGANOOOOIITHPlSHOI..O. TONOTEXCHDlflflCIESflHEIQH v.mlVEIITICAI.SUl'.fACESNOTMOJlfTK.I.Hl/•INCHESIHHEIQfTC8C100l1.S. 11~2.4. 118-303 i • AT UNIT TWO DOORS lMEEffORTTOOf'ERAT£THEOOOIISMIISTNOTO:CHDI.SPOUNOSFOI\EXT£NOII DOORSANDSPOONOSFORIHTE!IIOROOOIIS CIC11l2A.i
7 • ATUNITTWODOOl'lSl'IIOVU LEVEIIHAROWAJlf. cac 1132Al 1132AI

FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~20-IMMEFN\ERATED
0 r::~l1:ifu=7~r;:\!r~sf:~~~~~~1;:~s.112·~
0 LINE OF flOOR l!ELOW
0UHECfll:CIIASM
0 UHECfflllORA!!lWE
0 ~~~=~=~i&~~1~~n~~'ki~EH
0:::
f.?D
U)
-<I:
....l
®
® ii
'?
iD
0 '?
~ --------------------- ----:-~ , ------- ----114'-0' --- ---------+---------------------------Jt' ® ~ ¥,---~-------- 38'-0' ------------,,'-------------- 38-0 ' ------ ------;,'-------------- 38'-0" ___________ __,, □ TOP 112.0'
(NJ ROOF AREA----W.,;;.i,-Q-l;i.q
tlEW ROOF~lG MATE ft Al TO

MATCH EXISTING
ELEV. 110.08'
TOP 110.7?
TOP 11W
TOP 110.72'
.....

SIIIGLE Pl Y MEMBRANE AOCf (fLAl) SI.Of'El/-1'/1-0'
----------j---
STUCCO EXTERIOR OVER MEAL LATH AND (2) LAYERS OF GRADE 'O' PAPER OVER STRUCTURAL SHEATHING PER SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE. EACH LAYER TO BE INSTALLED AS INDEPENDENT SEPARATE CONTINUOUS LAYER CBC 2510.6 SHEATHING PER SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE. PROVIDE 26 GA. GSM WEEP SCREED PER DETAIL. (EXPO OR EQUAL. SEE COLOR SCHEMES FOR COLORS) TEXTURE: 16/20 SAND WITH A LIGHT LACE TEXTURE.

EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE
•s• TILE ESR-1475 TO MATCH EXISTING w/ 30# BUILDING FELT OVERf COX PlYWOOOf. SPAN 12' O.C. F.6' O.C. E.

NAILING. A CLASS 'A" FIRE RATED ROOF. GAF SHINGLE
STUCCO EXTERIOR OVER MEAL LATH AND (2) LAYERS OF GRADE 'D' PAPER OVER STRUCTURAL SHEATHING PER SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE. EACH LAYER TO BE INSTALLED AS INDEPENDENT SEPARATE CONTINUOUS LAYER CBC 2510.6 SHEATHING PER SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE. PROVIDE 26 GA. GSM WEEP SCREED PER DETAIL. (EXPO OR EQUAL. SEE COLOR SCHEMES FOR COLORS) TEXTURE: 16/20 SAND WITH A LIGHT LACE TEXTURE.

EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE
"S" TILE ESR-1475 TO MATCH EXISTING w/ 30# BUILDING FELT OVER ~- CDX PLYWOOD ij SPAN 12" O.C. F.6" O.C. E.

NAILING. A CLASS "A" FIRE RATED ROOF. GAF SHINGLE
FG &415

EX GRADE
FGll600'
EX. GRADE

SIDE PERSPECTIVE
SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0"

SIDE PERSPECTIVE
SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0"
D
,r----------------- ------------'---------------- 114'-0"------------------------------------------.r ,r-----------38'-0 --------------,/!~----------- 38'-0 '--------------A~-----------38'-0"----------- --.r

EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1 '-0"

NEW ENTRY ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 00

THIRD FLOOR
PLAN
15' -11"

SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
5' - 11"
-4' -1"
00 ,T----------------------------- 77-10 -----------------------------¥ STUCCO EXTERIOR OVER MEAL LATH AND (2) LAYERS Of GRADE 'O' PAPER OVER STRUCTURAL SHEATHING PER SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE. EACH LAYER TO BE INSTALLED AS INDEPENDENT SEPARATE CONTINUOUS LAYER CBC 2510.6 SHEATHING PER SHEAR WAll SCHEDULE. PROVIDE 26 GA GSM WEEP SCREED PER DET,IJL. (EXPO DR EQUAL SEE COLOR SCHEMES FOR COLORS) TEXTURE: 16/20 SAND WITH A LIGHT LACE TEXTURE.

EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE
'S" TILE ESR-1 75 TO MATCH EJOSTING w/ 3011 BUILDING FELT OVERj· cox PLYW Ooij SPAN 12"0.C. f.6"0.C. E.

N,IJLING. A CLASS "A" FIRE RATED ROOF. GAF SHINGLE TOP 110.72' 7 -6 --f- 6 -0 ----r--- 6 -11 7
- --- - ----+-+-fl---
[iJ
- - ----- --+--+-.;+--
f- 6-11 -----,f- 4-11 ,(
----- ---------- ~+----~- --~,
ROOF PLATECENTER
25' - 11"

THIRD FLOOR
PLAN
15' - 11"

SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
5' - 11"
l
-
-1£...66.£0 Jt------=~~~'~"~"=~~~~~~~~b===========:b!:=====:=:f~=========~~~~~~=-=-=-=- _MAI~ FLQOR PLAN - tFG'600 -4'-1"-..., l!XCIWI£ I
I
I
I
I
I
_ _ _ _________ ,_c_,_"_'~ -------------j

NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/1 6" = 1 '-0"
Cl
_J
o_
A
B
C
D
E
SP#1
EL.I 13.10
PH:26.95
SP#2
EL: 11 1.03
PH:26.79
f
J'
2 St Gl.f"l.'"LIHCIRA'illl00:11UT) SlOrt1·r 1 0
- ..,
u
r
..r
.,=_-_...,_""-LL...._t'-L'-'-,..._'--'~_jj-""' - _,_,-_,_,"''jj:-_u'"'-_,.:t•tl::-.'-''"'--t'bj= ....... ._,_:tl=tl=t"' _,jj=b=t] ~ ; ~
:\: ------- ---~--- ---~""''"· ----- APPROXIMATE

LOCATION OF

SCAFFOLDING
~:-1, 'l:Jr-tl~-•:n,,,._r.
1t.UIIJ!:Xbl!'I:

El:'< '1J08
~"-. SP#4
~ EL:I 13 .07 . ..__ PH:27.42
"'~ '-.....
"'- SPtf3
""'- EL: I I I. I I - PH: 27.79
:.Niltt1t\tJ,'l111Jl: tOHII-L'lh ~1Kt1A Hf
u
"' .....,: J-',..J--,W--W--'~-i-H-H~'-'W-'...1--W--'.

ALL rOLC I ICICI ITC ·r1 I' Anc CCTIMATCD ADOV C CXICTINC GRADE/ROOF. ACTUAL POLE HEIGHT TO BE DETERMIN ED
BY SURVEYOR AT TIME OF s-AKII\G AND VERIFIED BY SURVEYOR AT TIME OF STORY POLE INSTALLATION

INSTALLATION
Pnor to erecting the story po'es, thE applicant and/or
representative must contact the Community Development
Depanment to CISO.Jss tne story polling process ano proceoures, and to review and approve the story pole plot plan pnor to c.onstruction The story -poles must be constructed as per an approved and certified story pole plan. Story poles $hall be erected of Vli41cte PVC pipe in combination with wire or line to show roof lines. A similar ·,vtute materiel mey be approved by lhe Community Development Director and shall be requested before the poles ore erected Small pieces of bnghtly colored cloth or tape should be affixed to the wire or I ne to f::>alit::ito :,ccur::no viowing of tho outlino of tho propccod ctructuro Eaves that extend beyond t'M:> feet should be shov..-n wrth different colored cloth or tape. ~tory poles snail be marked at every Toot .

Eadl story po e shall be numbered and shall correspond with the numbenng on the approved and
certlne<J story pole plot plan. Each nurrber on the story pole must be a minimum s ze of two (2) inches by three (3) inches, must be placed on'=l (1) root below the too and four (4} feel above U1e bottom of the pole, and mu.st remain legible throughout the entire process. The use of black ;,nyt self-sbck numbers 1s h1ghlv recommended CERTIFICATION/INSPECTION Tho oocuroey of tho etn..cturol outlino ootobl10hod by tho otory poles shall be venfilitd by a signlXI ;Uil:tement of a licensed surveyor or avi l engineer on a story pole plot plan. Pnor to the View Asseument Commuosicn·s fl~! duty nohced public heanng Oate, City Staff may make an on-stte inspection to vPnfy m n"()li;\Ot"A with 1hP. ;:i;pproVM story pnlP plem In the event Ihat the required sIory poles are not erected according to the approved story pole plan an appl cation may be w 11 lu1u-::IJ (1 0 111 il::, ~ .. h t:t.Ju lt:,,.J l lt:d!i\l\j Lld tt:: lUct ::.ul.J~Ut:lll meeting for that the .sto') pole.s may be corrected
NOTE: EXISTING SCAFFOLDING IS CURRENTLY INSTALLED ON

SITE AND WILL REMAIN FOR THE DURATION OF THE
INSTALLATION . POLES MAY HAVE TO BE INSTALLED OFFSET

FROM THE SCAFFOLDI NG AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION AN D

WI LL BE NOTED ON THE CERTIFICATION LETTER, AS
REQUIRED.
* POLES HA VE BEEN OFFSET 3' FROM BUILDING TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXISTING SCAFFOLDING. -BPS A.SP
Qt.if: 09•'03,:2021
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: January 12, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Clerk’s Department
SUBJECT: Council Boards, Committees, & Commissions Mid-Term Review
BACKGROUND:

Members of City Council (Council) serve on a variety of outside Boards, Committees and Commissions. City Council Policy No. 2 (Attachment 1) establishes guidelines for the Council to appoint Councilmembers to share in the Council’s representation on these outside agencies. The policy states that appointments will be made for two-year terms, unless otherwise stated by the Boards/Commissions/Committee, resulting in a biennial review to address expiring terms and changes in members due to an election/appointment. However, this policy does not prevent Council from making changes when necessary. Therefore, an annual report is submitted for review in alternate years to perform any desired modifications of appointments as well as to reaffirm all positions for those agencies that request annual confirmation.

This Staff Report is before Council to provide an opportunity to make any desired midterm changes to the Council Boards, Committees & Commissions.

DISCUSSION:

Regional Committee Terms
Regional committee terms may be set pursuant to their respective bylaws. Council Policy No. 2 states that any change of an appointee at mid-term shall complete the existing two-year term for which they are appointed. Therefore, a mid-term change to an existing appointment will result in the appointed Councilmember completing the remainder of the term for which they have been appointed.

January 12, 2022
Council Committees Review

Page 2 of 3 ends

Solana Beach City CouncilJanuary 12, 2022

Solana Beach City Council
January 12, 2022