Agenda packet — Solana Beach City Council, April 13, 2022

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 13, 2022 Page 1 of 7 AGENDA
Joint REGULAR Meeting
Wednesday, April 13, 2022 * 6:00 p.m.

City Hall / Council Chambers, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, California  City Council meetings are video recorded and archived as a permanent record. The video recording captures the complete proceedings of the meeting and is available for viewing on the City's website.  Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time prior to meetings for processing new submittals. Complete records containing meeting handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request.

PUBLIC MEETING ACCESS
The Regular Meetings of the City Council are scheduled for the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays and are broadcast live. The video taping of meetings are maintained as a permanent record and contain a detailed account of the proceedings. Council meeting tapings are archived and available for viewing on the City’s Public Meetings webpage.

WATCH THE MEETING
• Live web-streaming: Meetings web-stream live on the City’s website on the City’s Public Meetings webpage.

Find the large Live Meeting button.
• Live Broadcast on Local Govt. Channel: Meetings are broadcast live on Cox Communications - Channel 19 / Spectrum (Time Warner)-Channel 24 / AT&T U-verse Channel 99. • Archived videos online: The video taping of meetings are maintained as a permanent record and contain a detailed account of the proceedings. Council meeting tapings are archived and available for viewing on the City’s Public Meetings webpage.

AGENDA MATERIALS
A full City Council agenda packet including relative supporting documentation is available at City Hall, the Solana Beach Branch Library (157 Stevens Ave.), La Colonia Community Ctr., and online www.cityofsolanabeach.org. Agendas are posted at least 72 hours prior to regular meetings and at least 24 hours prior to special meetings. Writings and documents regarding an agenda of an open session meeting, received after the official posting, and distributed to the Council for consideration, will be made available for public viewing at the same time. In addition, items received at least 1 hour 30 minutes prior to the meeting time will be uploaded online with the agenda posting. Materials submitted for consideration should be forwarded to the City Clerk’s department 858-720-2400. The designated location for viewing of hard copies is the City Clerk’s office at City Hall during normal business hours.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Written correspondence (supplemental items) regarding an agenda item at an open session meeting should be submitted to the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected] with a) Subject line to include the meeting date b) Include the Agenda Item # as listed on the Agenda. o Correspondence received after the official posting of the agenda, but two hours prior to the meeting start time, on the meeting day, will be distributed to Council and made available online along with the agenda posting. All submittals received before the start of the meeting will be made part of the record. o Written submittals will be added to the record and not read out loud.

And/Or
Verbal Comment Participation:

Please submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk prior to the meeting, or the announcement of the Section/Item, to provide public comment. Allotted times for speaking are outlined on the speaker’s slip for each agenda section: Oral Communications, Consent, Public Hearings and Staff Reports.

Public speakers have 3 minutes each to speak on each topic. Time may be donated by another individual

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

SOLANA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, & HOUSING AUTHORITY
Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 13, 2022 Page 2 of 7 who is present at the meeting to allow an individual up to 6 minutes to speak. Group: Time may be donated by two individuals who are present at the meeting allowing an individual up to 10 minutes to speak. Group Hearings: For public hearings only, time may be donated by two individuals who are present at the meeting allowing an individual up to 15 minutes to speak.

SPECIAL ASSISTANCE NEEDED
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, persons with a disability may request an agenda in appropriate alternative formats as required by Section 202. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s office (858) 720-2400 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

As a courtesy to all meeting attendees, please set cellular phones and pagers to silent mode and engage in conversations outside the Council Chambers.

CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
Lesa Heebner, Mayor
Kelly Harless, Deputy Mayor David A. Zito, Councilmember Jewel Edson, Councilmember Kristi Becker, Councilmember Gregory Wade
City Manager
Johanna Canlas
City Attorney
Angela Ivey
City Clerk
SPEAKERS:

Please submit your speaker slip to the City Clerk prior to the meeting or the announcement of the Item. Allotted times for speaking are outlined on the speaker’s slip for Oral Communications, Consent, Public Hearings and Staff Reports.

READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS:

Pursuant to Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 2.04.460, at the time of introduction or adoption of an ordinance or adoption of a resolution, the same shall not be read in full unless after the reading of the title, further reading is requested by a member of the Council. If any Councilmember so requests, the ordinance or resolution shall be read in full. In the absence of such a request, this section shall constitute a waiver by the council of such reading.

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:

FLAG SALUTE:

APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

PROCLAMATIONS/CERTIFICATES: Ceremonial
None at the posting of this agenda
PRESENTATIONS: Ceremonial items that do not contain in-depth discussion and no action/direction.

None at the posting of this agenda
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:

Comments relating to items on this evening’s agenda are taken at the time the items are heard. This portion of the agenda provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items relating to City business and not appearing on today’s agenda by submitting a speaker slip (located on the back table) to the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action shall be taken by the City Council on public comment items. Council may refer items to the City Manager for placement on a future agenda. The maximum time allotted for each presentation is THREE MINUTES. No Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 7 donations of time are permitted (SBMC 2.04.190). Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

COUNCIL COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENTARY:

An opportunity for City Council to make brief announcements or report on their activities. These items are not agendized for official City business with no action or substantive discussion.

A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Action Items) (A.1. - A.8.)
Items listed on the Consent Calendar are to be acted in a single action of the City Council unless pulled for discussion. Any member of the public may address the City Council on an item of concern by submitting to the City Clerk a speaker slip (located on the back table) before the Consent Calendar is addressed. Those items removed from the Consent Calendar by a member of the Council will be trailed to the end of the agenda, while Consent Calendar items removed by the public will be heard immediately after approval of the Consent Calendar to hear the public speaker.

All speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for details.

Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

A.1. AB 1690 Support. (File 0480-070)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Consider the adoption of Resolution 2022-035 expressing support of AB 1690 and authorize the City Manager to send a letter to the appropriate legislative committee(s) in support of AB 1690.

Item A.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.2. Register Of Demands. (File 0300-30)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Ratify the list of demands for March 05, 2022 – March 25, 2022.

Item A.2. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.3. General Fund Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Changes. (File 0330-30) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Receive the report listing changes made to the Fiscal Year 2021/2022 General Fund Adopted Budget.

Item A.3. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 13, 2022 Page 4 of 7 A.4. Americans with Disability Act (ADA) Pedestrian Ramps. (File 0820-20) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-029:
a. Awarding a construction contract to Miramar General Engineering in the amount of $51,700 for the ADA Pedestrian Ramps, Bid No. 2022-04. b. Approving an amount of $8,000 for construction contingency. c. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the construction contract on behalf of the City.
d. Authorizing the City Manager to approve cumulative change orders up to the construction contingency amount.
e. Appropriating $59,700 to the Federal Grants revenue account and to the ADA Pedestrian Ramps CIP project, both in the CDBG fund.
f. Authorizing the City Treasurer to amend the FY 2021/22 Adopted Budget accordingly.

Item A.4. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.5. Economic Consulting Services – Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (File 0150-85) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-034 authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement, in an amount not to exceed $55,000, with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. for economic consulting services.

2. Authorize an appropriation of $30,000 from the Professional Services account in the City Manager’s department.

3. Authorize the City Treasurer to amend the FY 2021/2022 and FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget accordingly.

Item A.5. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.6. Temporary Staff Funding. (File 0560-40)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Approve Resolution 2022-036 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Robert Half Inc for Temporary Staffing Services for a not-to-exceed amount of $45,000.

2. Approve Resolution 2022-033 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Kforce Staffing Inc for Temporary Staffing Services for a not-to-exceed amount of $60,000.

Item A.6. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 13, 2022 Page 5 of 7 A.7. Utility Box Wrapping Project. (File 0910-41)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-032 authorizing the locations and artist stipend for the Utility Box Wrapping Project.

2. Authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $10,000 from the Public Arts Reserve in the TOT Coastal Visitors Fund.

Item A.7. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

NOTE: The City Council shall not begin a new agenda item after 10:30 p.m. unless approved by a unanimous vote of all members present. (SBMC 2.04.070) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (B.1)
This portion of the agenda provides citizens an opportunity to express their views on a specific issue as required by law after proper noticing by submitting a speaker slip (located on the back table) to the City Clerk. After considering all of the evidence, including written materials and oral testimony, the City Council must make a decision supported by findings and the findings must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. An applicant or designee(s) for a private development/business project, for which the public hearing is being held, is allotted a total of fifteen minutes to speak, as per SBMC 2.04.210. A portion of the fifteen minutes may be saved to respond to those who speak in opposition. All other speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for time allotment. Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

B.1. Public Hearing: 525 Ford Ave., Applicant: Cove Capital Properties, Case: DRP20- 006/SDP20-010 (File 0600-40)
The proposed project meets the minimum zoning requirements under the SBMC, may be found to be consistent with the General Plan and may be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings required as discussed in this report to approve a DRP.

Therefore, should the City Council be able to make the findings to approve the SDP, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2022-030 conditionally approving a DRP and SDP to demolish a singlefamily residence, construct a replacement 4,017 square-foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 525 Ford Avenue, Solana Beach.

Item B.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 13, 2022 Page 6 of 7 C. STAFF REPORTS: (C.1. – C.2.)
Submit speaker slips to the City Clerk.

All speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for time allotments. Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

C.1. Introduce (1st Reading) Ordinance 522 Regulating Non-Serialized Untraceable Ghost Guns. (File 0250-70)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Introduce Ordinance 522 amending Chapter 7.20 and adding Chapter 7.20.040 to the Solana Beach Municipal Code to address non-serialized untraceable ghost guns.

Item C.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

C.2. Climate Action Commission Appointment. (File 0120-06) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Consider the applications submitted for appointments to two vacancies on the Climate Action Commission with a term ending January 2023.

Item C.2. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

WORK PLAN COMMENTS:

Adopted June 23, 2021
COMPENSATION & REIMBURSEMENT DISCLOSURE:

GC: Article 2.3. Compensation: 53232.3. (a) Reimbursable expenses shall include, but not be limited to, meals, lodging, and travel. 53232.3 (d) Members of a legislative body shall provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency “City” at the next regular meeting of the legislative body.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS: Council Committees
REGIONAL COMMITTEES: (outside agencies, appointed by this Council) a. City Selection Committee (meets twice a year) Primary-Heebner, Alternate-Edson b. Clean Energy Alliance (CEA) JPA: Primary-Becker, Alternate-Zito c. County Service Area 17: Primary- Harless, Alternate-Edson d. Escondido Creek Watershed Authority: Becker /Staff (no alternate). e. League of Ca. Cities’ San Diego County Executive Committee: Primary-Becker, Alternate- Harless. Subcommittees determined by its members. f. League of Ca. Cities’ Local Legislative Committee: Primary-Harless, Alternate-Becker g. League of Ca. Cities’ Coastal Cities Issues Group (CCIG): Primary-Becker, AlternateHarless h. North County Dispatch JPA: Primary-Harless, Alternate-Becker i. North County Transit District: Primary-Edson, Alternate-Harless j. Regional Solid Waste Association (RSWA): Primary-Harless, Alternate-Zito Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 13, 2022 Page 7 of 7 k. SANDAG: Primary-Heebner, 1st Alternate-Zito, 2nd Alternate-Edson. Subcommittees determined by its members.
l. SANDAG Shoreline Preservation Committee: Primary-Becker, Alternate-Zito m. San Dieguito River Valley JPA: Primary-Harless, Alternate-Becker n. San Elijo JPA: Primary-Zito, Primary-Becker, Alternate-City Manager o. 22nd Agricultural District Association Community Relations Committee: Primary-Edson, Primary-Heebner
STANDING COMMITTEES: (All Primary Members) (Permanent Committees) a. Business Liaison Committee – Zito, Edson.
b. Fire Dept. Management Governance & Organizational Evaluation – Harless, Edson c. Highway 101 / Cedros Ave. Development Committee – Edson, Heebner d. Parks and Recreation Committee – Zito, Harless
e. Public Arts Committee – Edson, Heebner
f. School Relations Committee – Becker, Harless
g. Solana Beach-Del Mar Relations Committee – Heebner, Edson

CITIZEN COMMISSION(S)
a. Climate Action Commission: Primary-Zito, Alternate-Becker ADJOURN:

Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting is April 27, 2022
Always refer to the City’s website Event Calendar for an updated schedule or contact City Hall. www.cityofsolanabeach.org 858-720-2400

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
§
I, Angela Ivey, City Clerk of the City of Solana Beach, do hereby certify that this Agenda for the April 13, 2022 Council Meeting was called by City Council, Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency, Public Financing Authority, and the Housing Authority of the City of Solana Beach, California, was provided and posted on April 06, 2022 at 6:20 p.m. on the City Bulletin Board at the entrance to the City Council Chambers. Said meeting is held at 6:00 p.m. on April 13, 2022, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, California.

Angela Ivey, City Clerk
City of Solana Beach, CA
UPCOMING CITIZEN CITY COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS:

Regularly Scheduled, or Special Meetings that have been announced, are posted on each Citizen Commission’s Agenda webpage. See the Citizen Commission’s Agenda webpages or the City’s Events Calendar for updates. o Budget & Finance Commission
o Climate Action Commission
o Parks & Recreation Commission
o Public Arts Commission
o View Assessment Commission
}
COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager’s Department
SUBJECT: Council Consideration of Resolution 2022-035 in Support of AB 1690
BACKGROUND:

At the March 23, 2022 City Council meeting, the City Council was asked to lend its support for AB 1690 by members of the community during oral communications. AB 1690, co-authored by Assembly Member Boerner Horvath, prohibits the sale of a cigarette utilizing a single-use filter made of any material, an attachable and single-use plastic device meant to facilitate manual manipulation or filtration of a tobacco product, or a single-use electronic cigarette or vaporizer device.

The action before the City Council is whether to adopt Resolution 2022-035 and authorize the City Manager to send a letter to the appropriate legislative committee(s) in support of AB 1690.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed legislation, if enacted, would transition the sale of single-use cigarette and cigar, and all-in-one disposable vapes, including single-use integrated cannabis vaporizers to rechargeable and reusable smoking products. Additionally, violations of the sales ban can result in civil penalties of $500 per violation and are enforced by local prosecutorial authorities such as county or city attorneys.

The bill attempts to address the pervasive impacts that these single-use products have on our health and environment. Additionally, it would assist jurisdictions in their efforts to reduce quantities of cigarette butts littered into local waterways. The City of Solana Beach has long been a leader in environmental sustainability and tobacco reduction efforts April 13, 2021
Support AB 1690

Page 2 of 2 ends

including being the first city in the continental United States to ban smoking in our parks and on our beaches and banning the sale or distribution of flavored tobacco products.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The proposed City Council action does not constitute a “project” under the definition set forth in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 because it will not have a potential to result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment and is, therefore, not subject to CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact related to the adoption of this Resolution.

WORKPLAN:

N/A
OPTIONS:
• Adopt Resolution 2022- 035.
• Adopt Resolution 2022-035 with specific modifications. • Do not adopt Resolution 2022-035.
• Provide direction / feedback.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council consider the adoption of Resolution 2022-035 expressing support of AB 1690 and authorize the City Manager to send a letter to the appropriate legislative committee(s) in support of AB 1690.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager

1. Resolution 2022-035.

2. AB 1690 Letter of Support.

RESOLUTION 2022-035

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT
FOR AB 1690 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

SEND LETTER OF SUPPORT TO THE APPROPRIATE

LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES
WHEREAS, the City of Solana Beach has long been a leader in environmental sustainability and tobacco reduction efforts including being the first city in the continental United States to ban smoking in its beaches;
WHEREAS, AB 1690, if enacted, would prohibit the sale the sale of a cigarette utilizing a single-use filter made of any material, an attachable and single-use plastic device meant to facilitate manual manipulation or filtration of a tobacco product, or a single-use electronic cigarette or vaporizer device;
WHEREAS, the pervasive impacts of tobacco products and single-use products on public health and the environment must be addressed; and WHEREAS, passage of AB 1690 would assist jurisdictions in their efforts to reduce quantities of cigarette butts littered into local waterways.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the foregoing recitals are true and correct;

2. The City of Solana Beach calls on the state legislature to support and pass AB 1690; and

3. The City Manager is authorized to send a letter in support of AB 1690 to the appropriate legislative committee(s).

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April 2022, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________________ ______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk CITY OF SOLANA BEACH www.cityofsolanabeach.org
635 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075(858) 720-2400Fax (858) 720-2455 April 13, 2022
The Honorable Mark Stone,
Chair Assembly Judiciary
Committee
1020 N Street, Suite 104
Sacramento, CA 95814
SUBJECT: SUPPORT ASSEMBLY BILL 1690 (LUZ RIVAS, PETRIE-NORRIS, AND STONE) AS AMENDED ON MARCH 1, 2022 – TOBACCO AND CANNABIS PRODUCTS: SINGLE-USE COMPONENTS
Dear Assembly Member Wood:

The City of Solana Beach respectfully submits this letter of support for Assembly Bill 1690 (AB 1960), as introduced on January 24, 2022. The proposed legislation, if enacted, would transition the sale of single-use cigarette and cigar, and all-in-one disposable vapes, including single-use integrated cannabis vaporizers to rechargeable and reusable smoking products.

Additionally, violations of the sales ban can result in civil penalties of $500 per violation and are enforced by local prosecutorial authorities such as county or city attorneys.

Based on the foregoing, the City of Solana Beach supports AB 1690. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Gregory Wade, City Manager, at [email protected] or at (858) 720-2431.

Sincerely,
Lesa Heebner, Mayor
cc: Toni Atkins, Senate President Pro Tempore
Chris Ward, Assemblymember
Each Member and staff of Assembly Judiciary Committee
California State Association of Counties
League of California Cities – San Diego County Division CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.2.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance
SUBJECT: Register of Demands
BACKGROUND:

Section 3.04.020 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code requires that the City Council ratify a register of demands which represents all financial demands made upon the City for the applicable period.

DISCUSSION:

Staff certifies that the register of demands has been reviewed for accuracy, that funds are available to pay the above demands, and that the demands comply with the adopted budget.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Not a project as defined by CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The register of demands for March 5, 2022 through March 25, 2022 reflects total expenditures of $1,432,124.57 from various City sources.

WORK PLAN:

N/A
Register of Demands- 03/05/22 through 03/25/22
Check Register-Disbursement Fund (Attachment 1) $ 1,211,732.26 Retirement Payroll March 10, 2022 4,192.00
Council Payroll March 16, 2022 9,600.00
Net Payroll M19 March 18, 2022 206,600.31
TOTAL $ 1,432,124.57
April 13, 2022
Register of Demands

Page 2 of 2 ends

OPTIONS:
• Ratify the register of demands.
• Do not ratify and provide direction.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the above register of demands.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Check Register – Disbursement Fund
Page: 1 of 13
City of Solana Beach
Register of Demands
3/5/2022 - 3/25/2022
Department
Vendor Description Date
Check/EFT
Number Amount
100 - GENERAL FUND
ICMA PLAN 302817 MC9 031022 ICMA 03/10/2022 9000445 $5,344.82 ICMA PLAN 302817 Payroll Run 1 - Warrant M19 03/17/2022 9000449 $18,245.12 SOLANA BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC Payroll Run 1 - Warrant M19 03/17/2022 9000451 $850.00 US BANK JS-PURCHASE ERROR 03/25/2022 101595 $4.99
ICMA RHS 801939 Payroll Run 1 - Warrant M19 03/17/2022 9000450 $1,953.96 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL FEB 22 LIFE&ADD INS 03/17/2022 9000452 $1,321.58 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL FEB 22 SUPP LIFE INS 03/17/2022 9000452 $270.20 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL FEB 22 LTD 03/17/2022 9000452 $1,615.96 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES VISION-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 $495.93 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES COBRA-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 $20.33 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 ($6.79) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 ($41.54) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 $4.40 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 $4.40 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 $8.92 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 ($4.41) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 $4.30 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES COBRA-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 $11.29 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES COBRA-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 $11.29 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES OBRA-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 $11.29 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING-DEC 21 03/23/2022 3222201 $16.93 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING-DEC 21 03/23/2022 3222201 $5.64 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMIMG-DEC 21 03/23/2022 3222201 $5.64 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES VISION FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 $536.50 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES COBRA FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 $20.33 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 ($11.29) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 $41.53 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 ($4.40) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 ($4.40) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 ($8.92) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 $4.41 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 ($4.31) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES COBRA FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 $11.29 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES COBRA FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 $11.29 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES OBRA FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 $11.29 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 ($5.65) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 ($5.65) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES TIMING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 ($5.65) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES VISION-MAR 22 03/23/2022 3222203 $514.78 Page: 2 of 13
MEDICAL EYE SERVICES COBRA-MAR 22 03/23/2022 3222203 $20.33 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES COBRA-MAR 22 03/23/2022 3222203 $11.29 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES COBRA-MAR 22 03/23/2022 3222203 $11.29 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES OBRA-MAR 22 03/23/2022 3222203 $11.29 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES COBRA-MAR 22 03/23/2022 3222203 $19.91 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC Crossing Guard-02/06/22-02/19/22 03/10/2022 9000443 $6,076.98 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC CROSSING GUARDS-02/20/22-03/05/22 03/25/2022 9000453 $3,376.10 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC CROSSING GUARDS-01/23/22-02/05/22 03/25/2022 9000453 $6,650.91 CALPERS PERS HEALTH MARCH PREMIUM 03/08/2022 3232202 $50,631.15 EVAN L COOPER / AFSANEH COOPER RFND-SBGR-399/GRD20-0023-336 S NARDO 03/10/2022 101527 ($73,557.80) EVAN L COOPER / AFSANEH COOPER RFND-SBGR-399/GRD20-0023-336 S NARDO 03/10/2022 101527 $73,557.80 EVAN L COOPER / AFSANEH COOPER RFND-SBGR-399/GRD20-0023-336 S NARDO 03/10/2022 101527 $3,640.20 EVAN L COOPER / AFSANEH COOPER RFND-SBGR-399/GRD20-0023-336 S NARDO 03/10/2022 101527 $8,578.00 LAND HOLDINGS, LLC RFND-SBGR-400/GRD20-0028-516 FORD AVE 03/10/2022 101530 $63,547.00 WILLIAM FARLOW REFUND 03/25/2022 101620 $2,544.98
WILLIAM FARLOW REFUND 03/25/2022 101620 $18.08
STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. M18 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/10/2022 101549 $1,343.75 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. M18 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/10/2022 101549 $439.77 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. MC9 FSA CONTRIBUTION 03/25/2022 9000457 $237.50 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. M19 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTION 03/25/2022 9000457 $439.77 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. M19 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTION 03/25/2022 9000457 $1,343.75 SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY DENTAL MARCH 22 03/25/2022 9000454 $3,075.80 SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY DENTAL MARCH 22 03/25/2022 9000454 $89.20 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $183,362.45
1005100 - CITY COUNCIL
US BANK KM-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/25/2022 101594 $40.90
TOTAL CITY COUNCIL $40.90
1005150 - CITY CLERK
DFM ASSOCIATES INC 2022 CA ELECTION CODE BOOKS 03/25/2022 101600 $131.45 US BANK GA-SELF INKING STAMP 03/25/2022 101595 $18.95
US BANK GA-VIDEO TRANSLATION 03/25/2022 101594 $41.00
US BANK AI-FLOPPY READER/DVD RDR 03/25/2022 101594 $72.16 US BANK AI-RE-DISTRICTING INTRPTN 03/25/2022 101594 $240.00 US BANK AI-PLAN STORAGE BOXES 03/25/2022 101594 $189.58 US BANK MB-TRANSLATION SERVICE 03/25/2022 101594 $270.00 US BANK AI-2020 OUTGOING MAYOR 03/25/2022 101594 $254.89 US BANK MB-TRANSLATION SERVICE 03/25/2022 101594 $447.71 US BANK GA-VIDEO TRANSLATION 03/25/2022 101594 $121.50
US BANK GA-VIDEO TRANSLATION 03/25/2022 101594 $25.25
US BANK AI-NEW LAW CONF DEC 2022 03/25/2022 101594 $300.00 US BANK AI-GOOGLE STORAGE 03/25/2022 101594 $99.99
ROBERT HALF FRONT DESK-02/25/22 03/10/2022 101540 $1,280.92 FEDEX SHIPPING-01/28/22 03/10/2022 101528 $35.14
CAL EXPRESS COURIER RETRV RECORDS FOR EMPLY HOME 03/25/2022 101596 $41.00 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY INC MUNI CODE/WEB UPDATE 03/10/2022 101521 $419.25 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY INC WEB UPDATE 03/10/2022 101521 $667.50 TOTAL CITY CLERK $4,656.29
Page: 3 of 13
1005200 - CITY MANAGER
US BANK KM-STORAGE CONTAINERS 03/25/2022 101594 $50.59
US BANK KM-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/25/2022 101594 $51.69
US BANK KM-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/25/2022 101594 $25.80
US BANK DK-HOL TREE EDEN GARDENS 03/25/2022 101594 $859.12 US BANK DK-HOL DECORATIONS 03/25/2022 101594 $298.00
US BANK DK-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/25/2022 101595 $15.07
US BANK DK-HOL LIGHTS 03/25/2022 101594 $76.03
US BANK DK-EXTENSION CORDS 03/25/2022 101594 $26.92
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC PROF SVC-JAN 22 03/25/2022 101605 $8,729.38 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC PROF SVC-FEB 03/25/2022 101605 $4,228.75 EMANUELS JONES AND ASSOCIATES PROF SVC-JAN 22 03/17/2022 101569 $2,500.00 EMANUELS JONES AND ASSOCIATES PROF SVC-FEB 22 03/17/2022 101569 $2,500.00 EMANUELS JONES AND ASSOCIATES PROF SVC-MAR 22/FPPC QTR4 FILED 2022 03/17/2022 101569 $2,575.00 TOTAL CITY MANAGER $21,936.35
1005250 - LEGAL SERVICES
HOGAN LAW APC GENERAL LEGAL-OCT 03/25/2022 101604 $227.50 NIELSEN MERKSAMER REDISTRICT PROF SVC-FEB 03/17/2022 101578 $12,371.00 NIELSEN MERKSAMER REDISTRICT PROF SVC-JAN 03/17/2022 101578 $6,438.50 TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES $19,037.00
1005300 - FINANCE
US BANK RS-CSMFO CON 02/16-02/18 03/25/2022 101594 $470.00 US BANK RS-CSMFO ANNUAL MMBRSHIP 03/25/2022 101594 $110.00 US BANK RS-CAPITAL ASSET TAGS 03/25/2022 101594 $247.83 US BANK RS-TRAKIT TEST PAYMENT 03/25/2022 101595 $4.12
US BANK RS-TRAKIT TEST PAYMENT 03/25/2022 101595 $4.12
XEROX CORPORATION XEROX-CLERK-FEB 03/25/2022 101621 $77.63 TOTAL FINANCE $913.70
1005350 - SUPPORT SERVICES
XEROX CORPORATION XEROX-CLERK-FEB 03/25/2022 101621 $271.68 XEROX CORPORATION XEROX-PLANNING-FEB 03/25/2022 101621 $276.54 XEROX CORPORATION XEROX-PLANNING-FEB 03/25/2022 101621 $546.78 XEROX CORPORATION XEROX-UPSTAIRS-FEB 03/25/2022 101621 $63.25 XEROX CORPORATION XEROX-UPSTAIRS-FEB 03/25/2022 101621 $298.25 XEROX CORPORATION XEROX-FIERY-CLRK-FEB 03/25/2022 101621 $132.61 XEROX CORPORATION XEROX-FIERY-UPSTAIRS-FEB 03/25/2022 101621 $132.61 XEROX CORPORATION XEROX-FIERY-PLN-FEB 03/25/2022 101621 $122.84 TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICES $1,844.56
1005400 - HUMAN RESOURCES
US BANK PS-EMPOLYEE APPRECIATION 03/25/2022 101594 $100.00 US BANK Employee Appreciation Luncheon Catering 03/25/2022 101594 $2,297.23 US BANK PS-EMPOLYEE APPRECIATION 03/25/2022 101594 $1,798.50 LIEBERT CASSIDY INC PROF SVC-JAN 03/17/2022 101575 $848.00 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES ROUNDING-JAN 22 03/23/2022 3222201 ($0.17) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES ROUNDING FEB 22 03/23/2022 3222202 ($0.17) MEDICAL EYE SERVICES ROUNDING-MAR 22 03/23/2022 3222203 ($0.21) CALPERS PERS HEALTH MARCH ADMIN FEE 03/08/2022 3232202 $126.58 Page: 4 of 13
COASTAL LIVE SCAN AND INSURANCE LIVESCAN FINGERPRINT-02/28/22 03/17/2022 101565 $132.00 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES $5,301.76
1005450 - INFORMATION SERVICES
COX COMMUNICATIONS INC 0013410116811601-02/06-03/05 03/10/2022 101523 $67.39 COX COMMUNICATIONS INC 0013410116811601-03/06-04/05 03/25/2022 101599 $67.39 CDW GOVERNMENT INC Adobe Licenses 03/10/2022 9000444 $3,621.08 US BANK AT&T 03/25/2022 101594 $68.83
US BANK MM-WEB CAM LIGHT (COVID) 03/25/2022 101595 $20.46 US BANK MM-WEB CAMS (COVID) 03/25/2022 101594 $258.56
US BANK MM-PRINTER 03/25/2022 101594 $129.25
US BANK MM-3 YR PROTECTION PLAN 03/25/2022 101594 $21.99 US BANK DK-CONSTANT CONTACT 03/25/2022 101594 $55.00
US BANK DK-HOSTING DOMAINS 03/25/2022 101595 $9.95
US BANK MM-4 YR PROTECTION PLAN 03/25/2022 101594 $29.99 US BANK MM-COMPUTER POWER CORD 03/25/2022 101594 $30.71 US BANK MM-PRINTER 03/25/2022 101594 $177.78
US BANK AT&T 03/25/2022 101594 $53.50
US BANK MM-WEB CAMS (COVID) 03/25/2022 101594 $575.02
US BANK MM-POWER STRIPS (8) 03/25/2022 101594 $267.12
US BANK MM-VELCRO STRIPS 03/25/2022 101594 $31.50
US BANK MM-ADOBE LICENCES 03/25/2022 101594 $213.93
US BANK MM-SECURE E-WASTE DSTRCTN 03/25/2022 101594 $466.25 US BANK MM-MEMORY/HARD DRIVE 03/25/2022 101594 $179.92
US BANK MM-ERGONOMIC MOUSE 03/25/2022 101594 $43.09
US BANK AP-CITY HALL DATA 03/25/2022 101594 $264.85
US BANK DK-CONSTANT CONTACT 03/25/2022 101594 $55.00
US BANK DK-HOSTING DOMAINS 03/25/2022 101595 $9.95
VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 670601022-1-01/24-02/23/22 03/25/2022 101616 $152.04 WESTERN AUDIO VISUAL Western AV - AV Maintenance-MAR 22 03/10/2022 101554 $499.00 WESTERN AUDIO VISUAL CHAMBERS TECH-MAR 03/25/2022 101618 $499.00 AT&T CALNET 3 9391012282-01/24-02/23/22 03/25/2022 101592 $21.32 AT&T CALNET 3 9391053641-01/24-02/23/22 03/25/2022 101592 $167.08 TING FIBER INC. FIBER INTERNET CITY WIDE 03/25/2022 9000459 $3,249.00 TOTAL INFORMATION SERVICES $11,305.95
1005550 - PLANNING
UT SAN DIEGO - NRTH COUNTY PUB HRNG-DRP 21-012/SDP 21-014 03/10/2022 101552 $268.02 UT SAN DIEGO - NRTH COUNTY DRP21-024 03/25/2022 101615 $333.61 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ASSESOR/RECORDR MAP FEE 02/03/22 03/17/2022 101566 $2.00 TOTAL PLANNING $603.63
1005560 - BUILDING SERVICES
ESGIL CORPORATION BUILDING-JAN 22 03/10/2022 101526 $32,155.32 TOTAL BUILDING SERVICES $32,155.32
1005590 - PARKING ENFORCEMENT
US BANK DG-TIRES CODE FORD ESCAPE 03/25/2022 101594 $801.84 US BANK JL-BUSINESS CARDS/STMP 03/25/2022 101594 $51.71 EMBROIDERY IMAGE SOLANA BEACH OFFICER PATCH 03/17/2022 101570 $289.57 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL AUTO FUEL-01/08-02/07/22 03/10/2022 101555 $95.35 Page: 5 of 13
DANIEL WELTE RIEMB-TRAFFIC VESTS 03/17/2022 101568 $59.46 DIAMOND MMP, INC. STVR RENEWALS 03/10/2022 101533 $360.43 TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT $1,658.36
1006110 - LAW ENFORCEMENT
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. FY22 CAL ID Q3 & Q4 03/17/2022 101584 $1,262.00 TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT $1,262.00
1006120 - FIRE DEPARTMENT
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005512-000-JAN-MAR 03/25/2022 101611 $572.57 US BANK RP-GALVNZD NPPL/THRD TAPE 03/25/2022 101595 $12.65 US BANK CH-GRILL 03/25/2022 101594 $893.25
US BANK JM-COSTCO ANNUAL MEMBRSHP 03/25/2022 101594 $60.00 US BANK JM-GRILL COVER 03/25/2022 101595 $9.93
US BANK CH-PENS/BTTRY CHGR/EXTN CRD 03/25/2022 101594 $110.94 US BANK CH-FLAG 03/25/2022 101594 $91.36
US BANK CH-E230 TRAFFIC CONES 03/25/2022 101594 $74.39
US BANK CH-ROAD FLARES 03/25/2022 101594 $322.07
US BANK CH-RFND E237 HEAD LIGHT 03/25/2022 101594 ($279.95) US BANK CH-NOTE PADS 03/25/2022 101595 $8.01
US BANK JM-CLEANING SUPPLIES 03/25/2022 101594 $93.51
US BANK JM-CLEANING SUPPLIES 03/25/2022 101594 $384.27
US BANK JM-CLEANING SUPPLIES 03/25/2022 101594 $21.56
US BANK CH-E237 CRCT HEADLIGHT 03/25/2022 101594 $280.47 US BANK CH-E237 HEADLIGHT RETURN 03/25/2022 101595 $11.37 US BANK RP-US/CA FLAGS 03/25/2022 101594 $94.52
US BANK CH-E237 RPCMNT HEADLIGHT 03/25/2022 101594 $279.95 US BANK CH-E237 SAW BLADE 03/25/2022 101595 $21.54
US BANK JM-PRIME MEMBERSHIP 03/25/2022 101594 $128.22
US BANK JM-CLEANING SUPPLIES 03/25/2022 101594 $410.69
US BANK RF-REFUND 03/25/2022 101594 ($32.33)
PALOMAR COLLEGE FALL CLASS 2021-C#72442-SB 03/10/2022 101537 $1,136.00 PALOMAR COLLEGE FALL CLASS 2021-C#72442-DM 03/10/2022 101537 $568.00 PALOMAR COLLEGE SPRING CLASS 2022_2223/11 SB@71 03/17/2022 101580 $781.00 PALOMAR COLLEGE SPRING CLASS 2022_2223/2 DM@71 03/17/2022 101580 $142.00 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 962428212-1-01/29-02/28/22 03/25/2022 101616 $561.21 CITY OF ENCINITAS FIRE SHARED RESOURCE-FY21/22-06/22-12/06 03/10/2022 101520 $3,109.60 FIRE ETC. BOOTS-HANCOCK 03/17/2022 101571 $544.14
REGIONAL COMMS SYS, MS 056 - RCS CAP CODE-FEB 03/17/2022 101583 $32.50 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES, INC SCBA FLOW TEST 03/17/2022 101577 $867.56 AT&T CALNET 3 9391059865-01/01-01/31/22 03/25/2022 101592 $392.75 AT&T CALNET 3 9391059865-12/01-12/31/21 03/25/2022 101592 $395.63 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL AUTO FUEL-01/08-02/07/22 03/10/2022 101555 $203.40 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT $12,302.78
1006130 - ANIMAL CONTROL
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY & S.P.C.A. FY ANIMAL SVC-MAR 03/17/2022 101585 $7,228.00 TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL $7,228.00
1006150 - CIVIL DEFENSE
AT&T CALNET 3 9391012275-12/24/21-01/23/22 03/17/2022 101560 $166.16 Page: 6 of 13
AT&T CALNET 3 9391012275-01/24/22-02/23/22 03/17/2022 101560 $167.08 MAX THREADS LLC City Face Masks-DEPOSIT 03/09/2022 101432 $2,930.60 MAX THREADS LLC City Face Masks BALANCE DUE 03/09/2022 101432 $2,574.76 TOTAL CIVIL DEFENSE $5,838.60
1006170 - MARINE SAFETY
US BANK JS-UT SUBSCRIPTION 03/25/2022 101594 $481.14
US BANK JS-EMT CE COURSE 03/25/2022 101594 $62.25
US BANK JP-SMALL TOOLS 03/25/2022 101594 $96.88
US BANK JP-UBUBURU BLS/CPR RECERT 03/25/2022 101594 $23.00 US BANK RM-WIRE LOCK PINS FOR PWC 03/25/2022 101595 $15.07 US BANK RM-SILICONE LUBRICANT 03/25/2022 101595 $6.29
US BANK GU-WTR PRF COVER 03/25/2022 101594 $45.24
US BANK GU-O-RING/66' SPOOL 03/25/2022 101594 $30.92
US BANK GU-EMT REFRESHER COURSE 03/25/2022 101594 $124.20 US BANK GU-PROTOCOL BOOK 03/25/2022 101594 $24.84
US BANK GU-EMT CERT RENEWAL 03/25/2022 101594 $145.50
US BANK RM-FLASHLIGHTS 03/25/2022 101594 $32.95
US BANK JS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/25/2022 101594 $65.94
US BANK JS-BATTERIES 03/25/2022 101594 $44.20
US BANK GU-REG FOR EMT 03/25/2022 101594 $30.00
US BANK JP-HQ EQPMNT-SMALL TOOLS 03/25/2022 101594 $26.12 US BANK EM-E-BIKE TUNEUP/THROTTLE 03/25/2022 101594 $294.14 US BANK EM-REPLCMNT DIVE GLVS/MSK 03/25/2022 101594 $215.45 US BANK EM-EMT RENEWAL 03/25/2022 101594 $145.50
US BANK JP-CERT FEE-ST FIRE INSTRUC 03/25/2022 101594 $190.00 US BANK GU-PENCIL SHARPNR/PWR STRP 03/25/2022 101594 $59.24 US BANK GU-RESCUE BRD RCK-DMS/TWR 03/25/2022 101594 $27.96 US BANK GU-RESCUE BRD RCK-DMS/TWR 03/25/2022 101594 $40.14 US BANK GU-LOG BOOK (2022) 03/25/2022 101594 $50.43
US BANK JS-HOSE CNCTR & WASHERS 03/25/2022 101595 $8.47 US BANK JS-HOSE CART 03/25/2022 101594 $118.50
US BANK GU-BATHROOM CLEANER 03/25/2022 101595 $11.17
CULLIGAN OF SAN DIEGO DRINKING WATER SVC-MAR 03/17/2022 101567 $52.83 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 962428212-1-01/29-02/28/22 03/25/2022 101616 $152.04 AT&T CALNET 3 9391012281-08/25/21-09/24/21 03/17/2022 101560 $80.36 AT&T CALNET 3 9391019469-08/20/21-09/19/21 03/17/2022 101560 $26.06 AT&T CALNET 3 9391019469-09/20/21-10/19/21 03/17/2022 101560 $22.58 AT&T CALNET 3 9391019469-11/20/21-12/19/21 03/17/2022 101560 $22.21 AT&T CALNET 3 9391019469-12/20/21-01/19/22 03/17/2022 101560 $21.74 SHULTZ AUDIO VIDEO HEADPHONE CABLE/INSTAL 03/10/2022 101545 $386.16 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL AUTO FUEL-01/08-02/07/22 03/10/2022 101555 $620.58 TOTAL MARINE SAFETY $3,800.10
1006510 - ENGINEERING

STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL STENO PADS/CLIPBOARD/REPORT COVERS/FILE

POCKETS
03/10/2022 101548 $183.22
NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT ANNUAL LICENSE FEE-02/03/22-02/02/23 03/10/2022 101536 $299.49 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1-02/02-03/01/22 03/25/2022 101616 $71.74 BUSINESS PRINTING COMPANY INC BUSINESS CARDS-FORTIER 03/25/2022 101593 $103.18 Page: 7 of 13
UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SOCAL INC DIG ALERT-FEB 03/17/2022 101589 $100.75 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL AUTO FUEL-01/08-02/07/22 03/10/2022 101555 $140.66 TOTAL ENGINEERING $899.04
1006520 - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/10/2022 101534 $129.28 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/10/2022 101534 $13.62 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/10/2022 101534 $13.62 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PUBLIC WORKS 03/17/2022 101576 $19.55 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/25/2022 101608 $15.30 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC H-STORM DRAIN MAINT AND VIDEO INSPECTIONS 03/10/2022 101516 $1,140.00 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-014 03/25/2022 101611 $264.83 US BANK DG-DOG WASTE BAGS 03/25/2022 101594 $1,448.21
MIKHAIL OGAWA ENGINEERING STORMWATER PRK MNGMT-FEB 03/25/2022 101607 $6,427.38 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1-02/02-03/01/22 03/25/2022 101616 $71.74 SAN ELIJO JPA SAN ELIJO JPA-Q4/BECKER-PER DIEM-NOV/DEC 03/10/2022 101542 $2,676.00 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL AUTO FUEL-01/08-02/07/22 03/10/2022 101555 $409.19 HARMONY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SHERIFF-DECONTAMINATE/REMEDIATE BIOHAZARDS 03/17/2022 101572 $480.38 TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $13,109.10
1006530 - STREET MAINTENANCE
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/10/2022 101534 $23.35 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/10/2022 101534 $23.35 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PUBLIC WORKS 03/17/2022 101576 $33.50 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/25/2022 101608 $26.21 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC INDUSTRIAL TOTE/SPRAY PAINT 03/10/2022 101524 $79.61 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 011695-000 03/25/2022 101611 $124.27 SDG&E CO INC UTILITES-01/07-02/08 03/10/2022 101544 $930.42 SDG&E CO INC UTILITIES-01/01-02/08 03/10/2022 101544 $631.28 US BANK AP-MESSAGE BOARD 03/25/2022 101595 $4.36
SHURLOCK FENCE COMPANY CHAIN LINK MAINT 03/10/2022 101546 $320.00 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1-02/02-03/01/22 03/25/2022 101616 $71.74 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-JAN 03/10/2022 101535 $1,827.01 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 03/10/2022 101535 $409.74

NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-NOV 21 03/10/2022 101535 $1,827.01
NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA STREET LNDSCP SVC-OCT 03/17/2022 101579 $703.66 TRAFFIC SUPPLY, INC SIGNAGE/POSTS 03/10/2022 101551 $783.90 TRAFFIC SUPPLY, INC NO PRKNG SIGN 03/10/2022 101551 $182.25 JOSE GARCIA MILEAGE-03/03/22 03/17/2022 101574 $35.10
THE HOME DEPOT PRO LINERS 03/10/2022 101550 $266.33
WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL AUTO FUEL-01/08-02/07/22 03/10/2022 101555 $370.84 TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE $8,673.93
1006540 - TRAFFIC SAFETY
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC LED SCHOOL CROSSING SIGNS 03/25/2022 101622 $3,036.54 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC CREDIT FOR INV-95999 03/08/22 03/25/2022 101622 ($808.13) SDG&E CO INC UTILITES-01/07-02/08 03/10/2022 101544 $1,254.86 SDG&E CO INC UTILITIES-01/01-02/08 03/10/2022 101544 $569.73 US BANK DG-BIKE FRNDLY CTY SGNS (20) 03/25/2022 101594 $550.00 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC RED LIGHT CAMERA ENFORCEMENT 03/10/2022 9000447 $7,158.00 Page: 8 of 13
REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC RED LIGHT CAMERA -JAN 03/25/2022 9000456 $7,158.00 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1-02/02-03/01/22 03/25/2022 101616 $51.24 AT&T CALNET 3 9391012279-01/24/22-02/23/22 03/10/2022 101517 $47.37 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC Crossing Guard-02/06/22-02/19/22 03/10/2022 9000443 $3,272.22 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC CROSSING GUARDS-02/20/22-03/05/22 03/25/2022 9000453 $1,817.90 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC CROSSING GUARDS-01/23/22-02/05/22 03/25/2022 9000453 $3,581.27 AVONDALE INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS SOLAR SLOW SIGN 03/10/2022 101518 $2,070.00 TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY $29,759.00
1006550 - STREET CLEANING
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 011695-000 03/25/2022 101611 $72.99 CLEAN STREET STREET SWEEPING-FEB 03/17/2022 101564 $3,871.45 PRIDE INDUSTRIES TRASH ABATEMENT SERVICES-FEB 03/17/2022 101581 $541.03 TOTAL STREET CLEANING $4,485.47
1006560 - PARK MAINTENANCE
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/10/2022 101534 $129.28 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/10/2022 101534 $16.54 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/10/2022 101534 $16.54 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PUBLIC WORKS 03/17/2022 101576 $23.73 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/25/2022 101608 $18.56 RANCHO SANTA FE SECURITY SYS INC ALARM MONITORING-FEB 03/25/2022 101610 $942.30

RANCHO SANTA FE SECURITY SYS INC SECURITY PATROL, RESTROOM LOCKUP, ALARM

MONITORING
03/25/2022 101610 $611.58
DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC BLACK SPRAY 03/10/2022 101524 $15.06 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC TAPE/SCOCKET/GLOVES 03/25/2022 101601 $53.77 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC FIXTURE SOCKETS 03/25/2022 101601 $62.94 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-015 03/25/2022 101611 $152.76 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-016 03/25/2022 101611 $523.87 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-003 03/25/2022 101611 $495.33 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-000 03/25/2022 101611 $80.53 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-001 03/25/2022 101611 $74.42 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-002 03/25/2022 101611 $339.77 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 012448-000 03/25/2022 101611 $130.83 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 012448-001 03/25/2022 101611 $82.85 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-010 03/25/2022 101611 $121.65 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-011 03/25/2022 101611 $296.12 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-012 03/25/2022 101611 $941.17 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-013 03/25/2022 101611 $126.50 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-001 03/25/2022 101611 $108.39 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-004 03/25/2022 101611 $74.42 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-005 03/25/2022 101611 $184.55 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-006 03/25/2022 101611 $117.34 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-007 03/25/2022 101611 $92.55 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-008 03/25/2022 101611 $402.82 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-009 03/25/2022 101611 $74.42 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-019 03/25/2022 101611 $752.48 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-018 03/25/2022 101611 $408.40 GRAINGER INC SERVOMOTOR 03/10/2022 101529 $261.35
US BANK DG-MILKWEED CRT-FS 03/25/2022 101594 $572.42
Page: 9 of 13
US BANK DH-F150 TIRES 03/25/2022 101594 $450.49
US BANK DH-SHOVELS 03/25/2022 101594 $98.48
AA FARNSWORTH'S BACKFLOW SERVICES ANNUAL BACKFLOW TEST 03/10/2022 101515 $369.25 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1-02/02-03/01/22 03/25/2022 101616 $102.48 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-JAN 03/10/2022 101535 $17,586.13

NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-NOV 21 03/10/2022 101535 $16,071.47
NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-FEB 03/25/2022 101609 $2,248.59 DOG WASTE DEPOT MUTT-MITT CARTONS 03/10/2022 101525 $2,316.63 THE HOME DEPOT PRO LINERS 03/10/2022 101550 $266.32
STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY COMPANY LCCC-BUBBLER 03/25/2022 101612 $146.99 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL AUTO FUEL-01/08-02/07/22 03/10/2022 101555 $76.73 WESTERN MOTOR & ENGINE ROTO TILLER 03/25/2022 101619 $506.41 WESTERN MOTOR & ENGINE MAINT-02/08/22 03/25/2022 101619 $45.00 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE $48,590.21
1006570 - PUBLIC FACILITIES
RANCHO SANTA FE SECURITY SYS INC KEYPAD CLEANED AND CLEARED 03/25/2022 101610 $140.00 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC DROP CLOTH/LED DIMMER 03/10/2022 101524 $70.55 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC NUTS/SCREWS/CORNER BRACE 03/10/2022 101524 $21.32 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC LED DIMMER/OUTLET BOX 03/10/2022 101524 $61.61 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC CRIMPER/CONNECTOR 03/10/2022 101524 $46.13 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC FLAT COVER/OUTLET BOX/ARMORED CABLE 03/10/2022 101524 $318.90 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC PVC THREADED CAP 03/25/2022 101601 $2.41 SDG&E CO INC UTILITES-01/07-02/08 03/10/2022 101544 $6,474.88 SDG&E CO INC UTILITIES-01/01-02/08 03/10/2022 101544 $1,870.63 LEE'S LOCK & SAFE INC CABINET LOCK & KEYS 03/10/2022 101531 $147.59 GRAINGER INC CLOSET AUGER KIT 03/10/2022 101529 $234.44 GRAINGER INC LED BULB 03/10/2022 101529 $32.84
GRAINGER INC LED BULBS 03/25/2022 101603 $32.84
US BANK DG-KNOX BOX INSTALL-FC/LC 03/25/2022 101594 $642.20 US BANK AP-MINI FRIGERATOR 03/25/2022 101594 $418.06
US BANK DG-ROLLING PART/HEPA FLTR 03/25/2022 101594 $1,705.40 US BANK AP-BATTERIES(COVID) 03/25/2022 101594 $27.31
US BANK AP-ROBERTS RM MICROWAVE 03/25/2022 101594 $150.84 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST INC WIRE 03/10/2022 101522 $178.87 SAN ELIJO JPA SAN ELIJO JPA-Q4/BECKER-PER DIEM-NOV/DEC 03/10/2022 101542 $3,527.00 SAN ELIJO JPA SAN ELIJO JPA FY 20/21 CLOSE OUT BALANCE 03/10/2022 101542 ($4,269.00) NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-JAN 03/10/2022 101535 $2,848.75

NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-NOV 21 03/10/2022 101535 $2,509.06
24 HOUR ELEVATOR, INC 21/22 ELEVATOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT/REPAIR-MAR 03/25/2022 101590 $176.40 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 FIRST AID SUPPLIES-CH 03/17/2022 101562 $206.52 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 FIRST AID SUPPLIES-PW 03/25/2022 101598 $96.98 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST/RODENT CONTROL SVC-FEB-FS 03/10/2022 101539 $40.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST/RODENT CONTROL SVC-FEB-MS 03/10/2022 101539 $34.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST/RODENT CONTROL SVC-FEB-FCCC 03/10/2022 101539 $34.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST/RODENT CONTROL SVC-FEB-CH 03/10/2022 101539 $53.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST/RODENT CONTROL SVC-FEB-LC 03/10/2022 101539 $35.00 Page: 10 of 13
HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST/RODENT CONTROL SVC-FEB-PW 03/10/2022 101539 $34.00 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY COMPANY FLUSH VALVE 03/10/2022 101547 $121.52 CALIFORNIA OFFICE CLEANING, INC JANITORIAL/CUSTODIAL SVC AT CITY FACILITIES-FEB 03/25/2022 101597 $8,600.00 CALIFORNIA OFFICE CLEANING, INC JANITORIAL/CUSTODIAL SVC AT CITY FACILITIES-FEB 03/25/2022 101597 $150.00 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL AUTO FUEL-01/08-02/07/22 03/10/2022 101555 $127.87 READY REFRESH BY NESTLE DRINKING WATER-PW-FEB 03/17/2022 101582 $5.93 READY REFRESH BY NESTLE DRINKING WATER-CH-FEB 03/17/2022 101582 $185.89 READY REFRESH BY NESTLE DRINKING WATER-LC-FEB 03/17/2022 101582 $58.94 PRIDE INDUSTRIES TRASH ABATEMENT SERVICES-FEB 03/17/2022 101581 $541.03 TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES $27,693.71
1007100 - COMMUNITY SERVICES
ABLE PATROL & GUARD, INC DIA DE LOS MUERTOS-10/24/21 03/17/2022 101556 $375.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES $375.00
1007110 - GF-RECREATION
US BANK KW-CONFRENCE TRAVEL 03/25/2022 101594 $137.97
US BANK KW-TREE LIGHTING EVENT VAR 03/25/2022 101594 $1,671.86 US BANK KW-VETERANS DAY EVENT 03/25/2022 101594 $423.14 ABLE PATROL & GUARD, INC FCCC SECURITY-09/25/21 03/17/2022 101556 $150.00 ABLE PATROL & GUARD, INC FCCC SECURITY-11/20/21 03/17/2022 101556 $125.00 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS SANTA SLEIGH BANNERS 03/17/2022 101558 $205.64 SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. MAN LIFT-XMAS TREE DISMANTLE 03/17/2022 101588 $655.91 TOTAL GF-RECREATION $3,369.52
1205460 - SELF INSURANCE RETENTION
EBIX INC. QTRLY FEE NOV 21-JAN 22 03/25/2022 9000455 $482.73 TOTAL SELF INSURANCE RETENTION $482.73
1355200 - ASSET REPLACEMENT-CTY MNGR
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 50/50 WORK SPLIT-MAR 03/25/2022 101614 $224.94 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 50/50 WORK SPLIT-FEB 03/25/2022 101614 $1,799.49 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 50/50 WORK SPLIT-MAR 03/25/2022 101614 $899.75 TOTAL ASSET REPLACEMENT-CTY MNGR $2,924.18
1355300 - ASSET REPLACEMENT-FINANCE
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 50/50 WORK SPLIT-MAR 03/25/2022 101614 $475.06 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 50/50 WORK SPLIT-FEB 03/25/2022 101614 $3,800.51 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 50/50 WORK SPLIT-MAR 03/25/2022 101614 $1,900.25 TOTAL ASSET REPLACEMENT-FINANCE $6,175.82
1356120 - ASSET REPLACEMENT-FIRE
US BANK EP-MATTRESS (2) 03/25/2022 101594 $990.73
TOTAL ASSET REPLACEMENT-FIRE $990.73
1356170 - ASSET REPLACEMENT-MARN SFTY
ARANCIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED INFLATABLE RESCUE BOAT- PART 2 03/23/2022 3232201 $8,744.17 TOTAL ASSET REPLACEMENT-MARN SFTY $8,744.17
1605360 - OPEB OBLIGATION
MIDAMERICA CITYSOLANAG5-MAR 22 03/10/2022 9000446 $6,450.00 CALPERS PERS HEALTH MARCH ADMIN FEE 03/08/2022 3232202 $60.95 CALPERS PERS HEALTH MARCH RETIREE 03/08/2022 3232202 $4,470.00 TOTAL OPEB OBLIGATION $10,980.95
Page: 11 of 13
2037510 - HIGHWAY 101 LANDSC #33
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-004 03/25/2022 101611 $171.63 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 007732-000 03/25/2022 101611 $260.07 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-000 03/25/2022 101611 $166.22 SDG&E CO INC UTILITES-01/07-02/08 03/10/2022 101544 $3,102.15 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-JAN 03/10/2022 101535 $2,323.20

NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-NOV 21 03/10/2022 101535 $2,079.50
TOTAL HIGHWAY 101 LANDSC #33 $8,102.77
2047520 - MID 9C SANTA FE HILLS
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-029-12/16/21-02/15/22 03/10/2022 101543 $322.32 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-022 03/25/2022 101611 $388.85 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-023 03/25/2022 101611 $529.61 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-024 03/25/2022 101611 $404.49 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-025 03/25/2022 101611 $643.00 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-026 03/25/2022 101611 $897.15 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-016 03/25/2022 101611 $873.69 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-017 03/25/2022 101611 $61.56 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-018 03/25/2022 101611 $81.11 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-019 03/25/2022 101611 $417.37 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-020 03/25/2022 101611 $705.56 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-021 03/25/2022 101611 $490.51 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-014 03/25/2022 101611 $803.31 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-015 03/25/2022 101611 $521.79 SANTA FE HILLS HOA MONTHLY SFH MID PAYMENT 03/10/2022 9000448 $18,333.33 TOTAL MID 9C SANTA FE HILLS $25,473.65
2077550 - MID 9H SAN ELIJO #2
SAN ELIJO HILLS II HOA FY22 MID PAYMENTS-JAN 2022 03/10/2022 101541 $6,550.00 SAN ELIJO HILLS II HOA FY22 MID PAYMENTS-FEB 2022 03/10/2022 101541 $6,550.00 TOTAL MID 9H SAN ELIJO #2 $13,100.00
2087580 - COASTAL RAIL TRAIL MAINT
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-003 03/25/2022 101611 $117.34 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-020 03/25/2022 101611 $960.47 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-JAN 03/10/2022 101535 $4,973.58

NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES-NOV 21 03/10/2022 101535 $7,692.53
TOTAL COASTAL RAIL TRAIL MAINT $13,743.92
2117600 - STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT
SDG&E CO INC UTILITIES-01/01-02/08 03/10/2022 101544 $8,793.92 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1-02/02-03/01/22 03/25/2022 101616 $20.49 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT $8,814.41
2135550 - DEVELOPER PASS-THRU- PLANNING
PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1718.10/215-225 BARABRA AVE 03/10/2022 101538 $300.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DRP22002/661 SOLANA CIRCLE 03/10/2022 101538 $450.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DRP22003/718-726 STEVENS 03/10/2022 101538 $600.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DRP22005/1466 SANTA LUISA AVE 03/10/2022 101538 $450.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1717.20/729 BARABRA AVE 03/10/2022 101538 $300.00 Page: 12 of 13
PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DRP21014/418 GLENCREST 03/10/2022 101538 $300.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1719.03/640 VIA DE LA VALLE 03/10/2022 101538 $300.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DRP22004/722 W SOLANA CIRCLE 03/10/2022 101538 $450.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1714.08/329-343 COAST HWY 03/10/2022 101538 $450.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DRP21022/237 N ACACIA AVE 03/10/2022 101538 $300.00 SUMMIT ENVIROMENTAL GROUP, INC. 1714.29-SOLANA HIGHLANDS 03/25/2022 9000458 $1,380.00 TOTAL DEVELOPER PASS-THRU- PLANNING $5,280.00
2286510 - TRANSNET EXTENSION-CIP
CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES 9538 SAFE RT SCH 03/10/2022 101519 $1,058.44 TOTAL TRANSNET EXTENSION-CIP $1,058.44
2466510 - PER CAPITA GRANT FUND-CIP
CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES 9538 SAFE RT SCH 03/10/2022 101519 $3,175.31 TOTAL PER CAPITA GRANT FUND-CIP $3,175.31
2505570 - COASTAL BUSINESS/VISITORS
SOLANA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Q4 VISITOR CENTER 03/17/2022 101587 $7,500.00 ASCAP CONCERT LICENSE 2022 03/17/2022 101559 $390.00
BMI GENERAL LICENSING INC CONCERT LICENSE-2022 03/17/2022 101561 $391.00 HOLIDAY GOO EGGS FOR EGG HUNT 03/17/2022 101573 $388.51 SESAC, INC MUSIC RIGHTS LIC 2022 03/17/2022 101586 $1,003.25 TOTAL COASTAL BUSINESS/VISITORS $9,672.76
2706120 - PUBLIC SAFETY- FIRE
VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 962428212-1-01/29-02/28/22 03/25/2022 101616 $114.03 CITY OF ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT CSA17-DINNER/FORMS-SPAULDING 03/17/2022 101563 $59.73 L. N. CURTIS & SONS INC Curtis - Vortex-REMAINING BALANCE 03/10/2022 101532 $443.09 L. N. CURTIS & SONS INC WINCH LOKHEAD KIT 03/25/2022 101606 $3,477.17 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY- FIRE $4,094.02
2706170 - PUBLIC SAFETY- MARINE SAFETY
US BANK JS-FACE MASKS (CSA17) 03/25/2022 101594 $307.63 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY- MARINE SAFETY $307.63
4506190 - SAND REPLNSHMNT/RETENTION
WARWICK GROUP CONSULTANTS, LLC 9923.21 PROF SVC-FEB 03/25/2022 101617 $4,945.00 TING FIBER INC. FIBER INTERNET-MS-MAR 03/25/2022 9000459 $450.00 TING FIBER INC. FIBER INTERNET-MS-MAR 03/25/2022 9000459 $450.00 TOTAL SAND REPLNSHMNT/RETENTION $5,845.00
4506510 - SANDREPLNSHMNT/RETNTN-CIP
DOMUSSTUDIO ARCHITECTURE 19-144 9449 MS CENTR-FEB 03/25/2022 101602 $1,537.50 TOTAL SANDREPLNSHMNT/RETNTN-CIP $1,537.50
4596510 - MISC.CAPITALPROJECTS-ENG
VAN DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 9438 FC PRK DSN-JAN 03/10/2022 101553 $665.00 VAN DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 9438 FC PRK DSN-JAN 03/10/2022 101553 $745.00 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA 9530 TREE PLANTING-FEB 03/25/2022 101609 $373.42 TOTAL MISC.CAPITALPROJECTS-ENG $1,783.42
5097700 - SANITATION
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/10/2022 101534 $9.73 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/10/2022 101534 $9.73 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PUBLIC WORKS 03/17/2022 101576 $13.96 Page: 13 of 13
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/25/2022 101608 $10.92 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC I-DRAIN CLEANING 03/10/2022 101516 $425.00 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC I-SEWER CLEANING 03/17/2022 101557 $425.00 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC C-SEWER CLEANING-35,694 03/25/2022 101591 $17,847.00 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC B SEWER CLEANING-18,013 03/25/2022 101591 $12,068.71 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-014 03/25/2022 101611 $794.51 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1-02/02-03/01/22 03/25/2022 101616 $20.49 SAN ELIJO JPA SAN ELIJO JPA-Q4/BECKER-PER DIEM-NOV/DEC 03/10/2022 101542 $685,889.00 SAN ELIJO JPA SAN ELIJO JPA-Q4/BECKER-PER DIEM-NOV/DEC 03/10/2022 101542 $320.00 SAN ELIJO JPA SAN ELIJO JPA FY 20/21 CLOSE OUT BALANCE 03/10/2022 101542 ($88,761.00) AT&T CALNET 3 9391012277-01/24/22-02/23/22 03/10/2022 101517 $15.63 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL AUTO FUEL-01/08-02/07/22 03/10/2022 101555 $153.44 TOTAL SANITATION $629,242.12
REPORT TOTAL: $1,211,732.26
COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.3.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance
SUBJECT: Report on Changes Made to the General Fund Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22
BACKGROUND:

Staff provides a report at each Council meeting that lists changes made to the current Fiscal Year (FY) General Fund Adopted Budget. The information provided in this Staff Report lists the changes made through March 23, 2022.

DISCUSSION:

The following table on the next page reports the revenue, expenditures, and transfers for 1) the Adopted General Fund Budget approved by Council on June 23, 2021 (Resolution 2021- 092) and 2) any resolutions passed by Council that amended the Adopted General Fund Budget.

Action Description Revenues Expenditures
Transfers
from GF Net Surplus
Reso 2021-092 Adopted Budget 22,694,100 (20,222,560) (916,100) (1)/(2) $ 1,555,440 Reso 2021-086 Crossing Guards 121,540 (48,984) - 1,627,996 Reso 2021-096 FY22 MOU - (950) - 1,627,046
Reso 2021-103 Landscaping Maintenance Services - (40,000) - 1,587,046 Reso 2021-125 Street Maintenance and Repairs Project - - (200,000) (2) 1,387,046 Reso 2022-019 Street Maintenance and Repairs Project - - (17,500) (2) 1,369,546 Reso 2022-017 La Colonia Master Plan Update - - (32,140) (2) 1,337,406 Reso 2022-025 FY22 Mid-Year Budget Update 365,000 (358,000) - 1,344,406 Action Description Revenues Expenditures
Transfers
from GF Net
Reso 2021-124 FY21 Surplus- PARS Contribution - (455,000) (455,000)

GENERAL FUND - ADOPTED BUDGET PLUS CHANGES
As of March 23, 2022
General Fund Operations
General Fund Unreserved Balance
,.
,.
,.

April 13, 2022
General Fund Budget Changes -FY 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Not a project as defined by CEQA
FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
WORK PLAN:

N/A
OPTIONS:
∙ Receive the report.
∙ Do not accept the report
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive the report listing changes made to the FY 2021-2022 General Fund Adopted Budget.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation
_________________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.4.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Engineering Department
SUBJECT: City Council Consideration of Resolution 2022-029 Awarding a Construction Contract for Americans with
Disability Act (ADA) Pedestrian Ramps
BACKGROUND:

At the November 18, 2020 City Council meeting, the City Council authorized a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funding application for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) pedestrian ramp improvements at various public street intersections. The County of San Diego approved funding for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021/22 CDBG improvement project and issued a notice to proceed on December 7, 2021.

This item is before the City Council to consider approving Resolution 2022-029 (Attachment 1) awarding a construction contract to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, Miramar General Engineering, for the construction of ADA pedestrian ramps at various locations throughout the City.

DISCUSSION:

Staff prepared the construction documents for the installation of several pedestrian ramps and advertised the project for competitive bidding. The locations for pedestrian ramps included in the bid are listed in Attachment 2.

On March 15, 2022, five bids for ADA Pedestrian Ramps, Bid No. 2022-04, were received and publicly opened by the City Clerk. The bid results are listed on the table on the following page.

April 13, 2022
Award ADA Pedestrian Ramps

Page 2 of 3 ends

Bid Results
Contractors Base Bid
Miramar General Engineering $51,700.00
HSCC, Inc. $77,840.00
Just Construction, Inc. $79,120.00
A B Hashmi, Inc. $82,000.00
LC Paving & Sealing $101,473.36
The lowest bid submitted by Miramar General Engineering was found to be complete and responsive to the bid specifications. Miramar General Engineering has successfully completed previous street improvements for the City. Staff is recommending that Miramar General Engineering be awarded the construction contract. The contract duration is 15 working days (three weeks). Staff anticipates the project to be completed in June 2022.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City received County approval for $63,418 in CDBG funds for FY 2021/22. The total project budget is $59,700, which would be appropriated with the attached resolution. In addition to the $51,700 contract amount, Staff is recommending a construction contingency of $8,000 (approximately 15%) for unforeseen conditions and unanticipated changes, for a total construction budget of $59,700. The City will request that unexpended CDBG funds be carried over to a future year.

WORK PLAN:

This project is not identified in the FY 2021/22 Work Plan.

OPTIONS:
• Adopt Staff recommendations and award construction contract. • Postpone contract award and provide direction to Staff. • Reject construction bids and provide alternative direction to Staff.

April 13, 2022
Award ADA Pedestrian Ramps

Page 3 of 3 ends

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 2022-029:

1. Awarding a construction contract to Miramar General Engineering in the amount of $51,700 for the ADA Pedestrian Ramps, Bid No. 2022-04.

2. Approving an amount of $8,000 for construction contingency.

3. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the construction contract on behalf of the City.

4. Authorizing the City Manager to approve cumulative change orders up to the construction contingency amount.

5. Appropriating $59,700 to the Federal Grants revenue account and to the ADA Pedestrian Ramps CIP project, both in the CDBG fund.

6. Authorizing the City Treasurer to amend the FY 2021/22 Adopted Budget accordingly.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2022-029

2. List of ADA Ramp Locations
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2022 - 029

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING A

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO MIRAMAR GENERAL

ENGINEERING FOR AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES

ACT (ADA) PEDESTRIAN RAMPS
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2020, the City Council authorized a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) pedestrian ramp improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Solana Beach has received approval from the County of San Diego Department of Housing and Community Development for a CDBG improvement project in the amount of $63,418; and
WHEREAS, on March 15, 2022, five bids for ADA Pedestrian Ramps, Bid No. 2022-04, were received and publicly opened by the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, Miramar General Engineering was the lowest responsible bidder with a construction estimate of $51,700, and Miramar General Engineering’s bid was complete and responsive to the bid specifications; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommends a contingency of $8,000 for unforeseen changes.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Council awards the construction contract to Miramar General Engineering in the amount of $51,700 for the ADA Pedestrian Ramps, Bid No. 2022-04.

3. That the City Council approves an amount of $8,000 for construction contingency.

4. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute the construction contract on behalf of the City.

5. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to approve cumulative change orders up to the construction contingency amount.

Resolution 2022-029
Award ADA Pedestrian Ramps

Page 2 of 2 ends

6. That the City Council appropriates $59,700 to the Federal Grants revenue account and to the ADA Pedestrian Ramps CIP project, both in the CDBG fund.

7. That the City Council authorizes the City Treasurer to amend the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Adopted Budget accordingly.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April 2022 at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 2
List of ADA Ramp Locations
FY 2021-22
No. Cross Streets Corner
1 Lomas Santa Fe Dr Highland Drive NE
2 503 South Sierra Ave mid-block crossing east side
3 West Cliff St Acacia Ave NW
4 West Cliff St Acacia Ave NE
5 West Cliff St Alley east of Acacia NW
6 West Cliff St North Sierra Ave SE
7 Santa Victoria Santa Alicia NW
8 Santa Victoria Santa Alicia NE
9 Santa Victoria San Patricio NE
10 Santa Victoria San Patricio SE
11 Santa Rufina San Patricio NW
12 Santa Rufina San Patricio SW
13 Santa Petra San Mario NW
14 Santa Petra San Mario SW
All locations listed above have no ramps or non-standard ramps to be removed and replaced with current ADA ramp standards.

CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.5.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2022-034 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the
Professional Services Agreement with Keyser Marston
Associates, Inc. to Provide Economic Consulting
Services
BACKGROUND:

From time to time, the City of Solana Beach (City) requires detailed and highly technical economic analyses to be performed in support of City operations, real property negotiations and project evaluation. Because of the unique nature of these services, and pursuant to Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) Section 3.08.140, it is in the best interest of the public, as allowed by state law, that contracts for professional services such as these can be selected on the basis of demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required, negotiated between parties rather than on the basis of cost alone. Therefore, the City Manager is not limited to awarding professional services contracts to the lowest responsible bidder, but rather on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications for the types of service to be performed at a fair and reasonable price.

This item is before the City Council to consider adoption of Resolution 2022-034 (Attachment 1) authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Professional Service Agreement (PSA) with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (KMA) to provide as-needed economic consulting services.

DISCUSSION:

The City is engaged with KMA to provide highly technical economic consulting services.

The current agreement with KMA is for one year from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 and includes a not-to-exceed amount of $24,999. Since the services needed at this time April 13, 2022

KMA PSA

Page 2 of 3 ends

require demonstrated competence, qualifications and specific knowledge of the subject matter for which the services are requested, Staff recommends that the PSA with KMA be extended for an additional year for these as-needed economic consultant services.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Approval of the PSA with KMA is not a project as defined by CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The current fiscal year 2021/22 adopted budget includes $25,000 for services provided by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. The proposed amendment to the PSA would add an additional $30,000 to the agreement and extend the term for an additional year to June 30th , 2023. Staff is recommending adding appropriations of $30,000 from General Fund unreserved fund balance to the City Manager’s Professional Services account.

WORK PLAN:

This project is consistent with Items B.3 of the Community Character Priorities and A.1 of the Fiscal Sustainability Priorities of the FY 2021/22 Work Plan.

OPTIONS:
• Approve Staff recommendation.
• Approve Staff recommendation with modifications.
• Provide direction.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

2. Authorize an appropriation of $30,000 from the Professional Services account in the City Manager’s department.

3. Authorize the City Treasurer to amend the FY 2021/2022 and FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget accordingly.

April 13, 2022

KMA PSA

Page 3 of 3 ends

CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2022-034
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2022-034

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVES A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KEYSER
MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ECONOMIC

CONSULTING SERVICES
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to employ Keyser Marston Associates, Inc, (CONSULTANT) to furnish economic consulting services (“PROFESSIONAL SERVICES”) to the City of Solana Beach (CITY); and
WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that CONSULTANT is qualified by experience and its ability to perform the services desired by CITY, and CONSULTANT is willing to perform such services; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT will conduct all the work as described and detailed in this AGREEMENT to be provided to the CITY.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement, in an amount not to exceed $55,000, with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. to provide economic consulting services.

3. That the City Council appropriates of $30,000 from the Professional Services account in the City Manager’s department.

4. That the City Council authorizes the City Treasurer to amend the FY 2021/2022 and FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget accordingly.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April 2022, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO:

FROM:

MEETING DATE:

ORIGINATING DEPT:

SUBJECT:

Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Gregory Wade, City Manager
April 13, 2022
City Clerk
Council Consideration of Resolutions 2022-036 and
2022-033 Authorizing Professional Service Agreements
for Temporary Staffing Services
BACKGROUND:

The City Clerk’s Department has had a vacancy in the front desk Management Assistant position since November 2021. Temporary staffing has been utilized to backfill the position. Temporary services were obtained by Robert Half for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021/2022.

The Finance Department and Engineering Department also have vacancies that require temporary staffing to backfill the positions until they are permanently filled. Temporary staffing services are being obtained through Kforce Staffing for these two positions.

This item is before City Council (Council) to consider adoption of Resolution 2022-036 (Attachment 1) and Resolution 2022-033 (Attachment 2) authorizing the City Manager to execute Professional Services Agreements to provide necessary temporary staffing for coverage in the City Clerk’s Office, the Finance Department, and the Engineering Department.

DISCUSSION:

Temporary Staffing Costs – Management Assistant Vacancy Temporary staffing services have continued to be used to provide coverage for the vacant Management Assistant position in the City Clerk’s Department. Throughout FY 2021/22, Robert Half has been utilized for these services. Council approval for continued use of April 13, 2022
Temporary Staff Funding

Page 2 of 3 ends

these services is required as the total cost for Robert Half will soon exceed the City Manager’s approval authority.

To date, total funds spent with Robert Half, with a few payments pending, has totaled just under $24,999. Forecasted costs, until a permanent hire has been made, are estimated to be an additional $20,000. The hiring process for a full-time permanent employee began in January 2022 and is expected to be completed by the end of April or beginning of May.

Staff is requesting that Council approve the additional $20,000 expenditure, for a total of $45,000, with Robert Half.

Temporary Staffing Costs – Finance Department
The Finance Department obtained temporary staffing services from Kforce Staffing in February 2022 to assist with processing of the annual Business Certificate renewals and Short Term Vacation Rental permit renewals. These services were expected to last through April 15th. However, a vacancy has opened up in the department and Staff is requesting to extend the appointment through the end of May. Staff has estimated that these services will cost $20,000.

Temporary Staffing Costs – Engineering Department
The Engineering Department recently experienced a vacancy and would also like to obtain temporary staffing services from Kforce Staffing. This temporary appointment is expected to last between 2 to 4 months. Staff has estimated that the total cost of services will be $40,000.

Staff is requesting a combined total of $60,0000 for temporary staffing services with Kforce Staffing for the Finance Department and Engineering Department.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

The total costs for temporary staffing services are anticipated to not exceed $105,000.

These positions are budgeted full-time for base salary and benefits. There are sufficient savings in salaries and benefits, due to the vacancies, to cover the cost of the temporary services. Currently, staffing coverage is provided by Robert Half and Kforce Staffing; however, until the positions are filled, they could be provided by another agency, if necessary.

WORK PLAN: N/A

OPTIONS
∙ Approve Staff recommendation.

April 13, 2022
Temporary Staff Funding

Page 3 of 3 ends

∙ Approve Staff recommendation with alternative amendments / modifications.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve Resolution 2022-036 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Robert Half Inc for Temporary Staffing Services for a not-to-exceed amount of $45,000.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2022-036

2. Resolution 2022-033
RESOLUTION 2022-036

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH

ROBERT HALF, INC
WHEREAS, the City Clerk’s Department Administrative Assistant position has been vacant since November, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the vacancy within the City Clerk’s Department has required the assistance of temporary help from temporary staffing agencies to cover the position; and WHEREAS, temporary staffing coverage for the department position for Fiscal Year 2021/22, until an estimated hire date in May, 2022, is an estimated cost of $45,000; and
WHEREAS, the total cost exceeds the City Manager’s purchasing authority.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Robert Half, Inc to provide temporary staffing services for an amount not to exceed $45,000.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April, 2022, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH

KFORCE STAFFING, INC
WHEREAS, the Finance Department and Engineering Department have vacant positions; and
WHEREAS, the vacancies within the Finance Department and Engineering Department require the assistance of temporary help from temporary staffing agencies to cover the positions; and
WHEREAS, temporary staffing coverage for the vacant positions have an estimated cost of $60,000; and
WHEREAS, the total cost exceeds the City Manager’s purchasing authority.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Kforce Staffing, Inc to provide temporary staffing services for an amount not to exceed $60,000.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April, 2022, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LISA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_______________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.7.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager’s
SUBJECT: City Council Consideration of Resolution 2022-032 Approving the Utility Box Wrapping Project
BACKGROUND:

On September 19, 2007, the City Council adopted Council Policy No. 17 - Master Art Policy (MAP). The MAP aspires to enhance the aesthetic qualities of Solana Beach while creating an atmosphere that nurtures, enhances, and encourages art. The MAP aims to develop public art programs and projects that represents a wide range of artistic styles through a process that encourages community dialogue and involvement. All these actions will help identify Solana Beach as a community committed to art and culture.

Due to the success and popularity of the Temporary Public Arts Program, members of the Public Arts Commission (PAC) and members of the community have requested a public arts program that involves wrapping utility boxes with a variety of artistic designs.

In alignment with the MAP, this Utility Box Wrapping Project (Project) will result in a mixture of enriching opportunities and a visual art collection that reflects the local environment, cultural values, and artistic vitality of the community.

The annual Work Plan is a guiding document that includes all City Council’s priority projects for the fiscal year. Periodically, the Council directs Staff to explore significant items that are not listed in the adopted Work Plan. On March 23, 2022, the Council approved the addition of the Utility Box Wrapping Project as a Priority Item for this fiscal year and directed Staff to bring this Project to the City Council for review and approval.

This item is before City Council to consider approving Resolution 2022-032 (Attachment 1) authorizing the locations and artist stipends for the Utility Box Wrapping Project.

DISCUSSION:

At the regular PAC meeting on June 22, 2021, the PAC formed a Utility Box SubCommittee for the purposes of developing this Project. The sub-committee explored the April 13, 2022
Utility Box Wrap Project

Page 2 of 4 ends

City to locate suitable utility boxes for the Project and initially selected 23 sites in the public right-of-way. On September 27, 2021, the sub-committee and Staff held a meeting with San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) Public Affairs Manager Joe Gabaldon to discuss wrapping SDG&E utility boxes. At this meeting, SDG&E informed the City that they no longer allow wrapping of their utility boxes and only allow their boxes to be painted.

The sub-committee then requested that the Engineering Department review the initial 23 locations to provide comments and to identify the utility companies that correspond with each utility box and to provide additional comments. Staff presented the Engineering Department’s comments to the PAC at the October 26, 2021 meeting, where the PAC unanimously approved recommending nine locations for City Council consideration. Due to wrapping concerns, three of the recommended locations have been removed from the list. Now, the following six locations, with a total of seven utility boxes, are being recommended for City Council consideration (see map in Attachment 2).

1. Adjacent to HomeGoods on Lomas Santa Fe Drive

2. Intersection of Solana Hills and Lomas Santa Fe Drive

3. Intersection of Lomas Santa Fe Drive and Stevens Ave

4. The Fire Station (two boxes located here)

5. Intersection of S. Cedros Ave and Lomas Santa Fe

6. Coastal Rail Trail across from the Holiday Inn
At the regular PAC meeting on January 25, 2022, Staff presented a comprehensive report on other similar city operated utility box wrapping programs with their approved artist stipend. Based on this report, the PAC unanimously approved recommending a $450 artist stipend for each utility box for City Council consideration. If approved, Staff will send out a call-to-artists soliciting qualified artists to submit a conceptualized design proposal.

The PAC will review and select from the submitted art proposals.

Public Arts Reserve and Funding
As stated in the MAP, in order to sustain annual funding for the Public Art Programs, the City has implemented a combination of funding options that enables the City to coordinate a consistent and enriching public art program. The primary funding sources, as described below, are allocated to the City's Public Art Account Reserve to cover shortterm and long-term capital, operations, and maintenance costs. These funds can only be used in accordance with the MAP.

1. Transient Occupancy Tax - In 2006, Solana Beach voters approved an increase in the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), the tax that is charged for hotel and motel room nights, which increased TOT by one percent per year to a maximum of 13% starting January 1, 2007. One third of the increase, up to a maximum one percent, is collected in a fund entitled Coastal Area Business/Visitor Assistance and Enhancement Fund (CABVAE Fund). Annually, April 13, 2022
Utility Box Wrap Project

Page 3 of 4 ends

30% of the revenues from the CABVAE Fund is designated to support public art in Solana Beach. Another 20% of the revenues from the CABVAE Fund is allocated for communications and outreach efforts to support cultural tourism and marketing of the City.

2. Public Art Fee - One-half Percent (0.5%) - A Public Art Fee program for development of public art in accordance with the MAP, sets aside a small percentage, one-half percent (0.5%), of the total construction budget of covered private development projects initiated in the City of Solana Beach. This fee can be paid into the City-controlled Public Art Account Reserve or used by the developer to incorporate or purchase City-approved public art for their project. a. Covered Private Development Projects - The Public Art Fee, equivalent to 0.5% of the total building permit valuation, shall be applied to all covered private development projects as described below. Total building valuation is computed by using the latest Council-approved Building Valuation Data as set forth by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and applied by the City's Building Services Division. This fee must be paid at the start of the project and is be placed in the Reserve Public Art Account. The following types of private development projects are required to pay the Public Art Fee:
i. Commercial and Industrial Development Projects with a building permit valuation of $500,000 or more. This includes all new construction and all remodels/reconstruction projects.
ii. Residential Projects with a building permit valuation of $500,000 or more and five (5) or more dwelling units. Single family residential projects of four (4) dwelling units or less are exempt from the Public Art Fee regardless of building permit valuation.

As a result of these funding sources, as of January 2022, there is a total of $215,903 in the Public Art Account Reserve, which consists of $26,728 in the General Fund and $189,175 in the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - Coastal/Visitors Fund.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The MAP established the Public Art Account Reserve “to be used to provide Solana Beach a rich artistic environment" and allows the City to use the Reserve Public Art Account funds for public art installations and maintenance. The estimated cost for wrapping utility boxes is $15 per square foot, which is approximately $6,000 for all six April 13, 2022
Utility Box Wrap Project

Page 4 of 4 ends

locations. If City Council approves the recommended $450 artist stipend, the total artist compensation for seven utility boxes will be $3,150.

Staff recommends appropriating $10,000 from available funds in the City’s Public Art Account Reserve for this Project. As of January 2022, there is a total of $215,903 in the Public Art Account Reserve, which consists of $26,728 in the General Fund and $189,175 in the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - Coastal/Visitors Fund WORK PLAN:

Although not in the current FY 2021/22 Work Plan, the Council directed Staff at the March 23, 2022 City Council meeting to prioritize this Project for implementation prior to July 1, 2022.

OPTIONS:
• Approve Resolution 2022-032 authorizing the locations and artist stipends for the Utility Box Wrapping Project.
• Do not approve Resolution 2022-032 authorizing the locations and artist stipends for the Utility Box Wrapping Project and provide direction.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-032 authorizing the locations and artist stipend for the Utility Box Wrapping Project.

2. Authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $10,000 from the Public Arts Reserve in the TOT Coastal Visitors Fund.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2022-032

2. Utility Box Map
RESOLUTION 2022-032

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING

THE LOCATIONS AND ARTIST STIPENDS FOR THE

UTILITY BOX WRAPPING PROJECT
WHEREAS, On September 19, 2007, the City Council adopted Council Policy No. 17 - Master Art Policy (MAP) to enhance the aesthetic qualities of Solana Beach with a wide range of artistic styles through a process that will help identify Solana Beach as a community committed to art and culture; and
WHEREAS, the success and popularity of the Temporary Public Arts Program, members of the Public Arts Commission (PAC) and members of the community have requested a public arts program that involves wrapping utility boxes with a variety of artistic designs; and
WHEREAS, on March 23, 2022, the Council approved the addition of the Utility Box Wrapping Project as a Priority Item for this fiscal year and directed Staff to bring this Project to the City Council for review and approval; and WHEREAS, the MAP established the Public Art Account Reserve "to be used to provide Solana Beach a rich artistic environment" and designates that the City can use the Public Art Account Reserve funds to develop public art programs and projects.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true andcorrect.

2. That the City Council authorizes the locations and artist stipend for the Utility Box Wrapping Project.

3. That the City Council authorizes the Finance Director/City Treasurer to appropriate $10,000 from the Public Arts Reserve in the TOT Coastal Visitors Fund.

Resolution 2022-032
Utility Box Wrapping Project

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April 2022, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers -
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk The Fire Station
(two boxes)
Adjacent to HomeGoods
on Lomas Santa Fe Drive
Intersection of Solana Hills
and Lomas Santa Fe Drive
Intersection of S. Cedros
Ave and Lomas Santa Fe
1 2 3
4 5 6
intersection Stevens Ave
and Lomas Santa Fe Drive
Costal Rail Trail across
from the Holiday Inn
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # B.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Request for a DRP/SDP to Demolish and Single-Family Residence, Construct a Replacement SingleFamily Residence with an Attached Garage, and Perform Associated Site Improvements at 525 Ford Avenue.
(Applicant: Cove Capital Properties; Application: DRP20- 006/SDP20-010; APN: 263-191-09; Resolution No. 2022-
030)
BACKGROUND:

The Applicant, Cove Capital Properties (care of Troy Foss), is requesting City Council approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SDP) to demolish a single-story single-family residence, construct a replacement 3,912 square-foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached 505 square-foot two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 525 Ford Avenue. The 11,856 square-foot lot is located within the Low Residential (LR) Zone, Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ), and the Very High Fire Severity Zone.

The project proposes grading in the amounts of approximately 200 cubic yards of cut, 70 cubic yards of fill, 230 cubic yards of removal and recompaction, an aggregate grading quantity of 511 cubic yards, and 130 cubic yards of export off site. The maximum building height is proposed at 24.08 feet above the proposed grade with the highest point of the residence at 320.00 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL). The project meets three thresholds for the requirement of a DRP, including: 1) grading in excess of 100 cubic yards; 2) construction in excess of 60 percent of the maximum allowable floor area; and 3) construction of a second story that exceeds 35 percent of the floor area of the first floor.

The project requires a SDP because the proposed development exceeds 16 feet in height above the existing grade.

The issue before the Council is whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Applicant’s request as contained in Resolution 2022-030 (Attachment 1).

April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 2 of 13 ends

DISCUSSION:

The 11.856 square-foot lot is located on the north side of Ford Avenue, three properties east of the intersection of Ford Avenue and Marview Drive. The property is relatively flat but slopes up approximately four feet from the improved street to the buildable area.

There is a 10-foot wide water easement located along the rear (north) property line. The property is currently developed with a single-story single-family residence and a detached two car garage that is accessed from Ford Avenue by a gravel driveway on the west side of the property. There is also a second paved driveway on the east side of the residence.

The Applicant is requesting approval of a DRP and SDP to demolish all existing improvements on site and construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage and perform associated site improvements including grading, a pool and spa, hardscape, fencing, and landscaping. The project plans are provided in Attachment 2.

Table 1 (below) provides a comparison of the SBMC applicable zoning regulations with the Applicant’s proposed design.

Table 1

LOT INFORMATION
Property Address:

Lot Size:

Max. Allowable Floor Area:

Proposed Floor Area:

Below Max. Floor Area by:

Max. Allowable Height:

Max. Proposed Height:

Highest Point/Ridge:

Overlay Zone(s):
525 Ford Ave.
11,856 sf
4,025 sf
4,017 sf
8 sf
25 ft

24.08 ft
320.00 MSL
SROZ
Very High Fire
Zoning Designation:
# of Units Allowed:
# of Units Requested:

LR (3 du/ac)
1 Dwelling Unit
1 Dwelling Unit
Setbacks: Required Proposed
Front (S) 20 ft.* 20 ft.

Interior Side (W) 5 ft. 13 ft.

Interior Side (E) 5 ft. 5 ft.

Rear (N) 25 ft. 25 ft.
* The front yard setback can be reduced to 20 feet as
Ford Avenue is 60 ft. in width.

PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION
Proposed Floor Area Breakdown: Required Permits:

DRP: A DRP is required for grading in excess of
100 cubic yards, construction that exceeds 60%
of the maximum allowable floor area, and
construction of a second story that exceeds
35% of the first floor.

SDP: A SDP is required for a new structure that
exceeds 16 feet in height from the existing grade.

First Floor Living Area
Second Floor Living Area
Attached Garage
Exterior Covered Areas
2,354 sf
1,542 sf
505 sf
16 sf
Subtotal
Off-Street Parking Exemption
4,417 sf
- 400 sf
Total Proposed Floor Area: 4,017 sf
Proposed Grading: 200 yd3 cut, 70 yd3 of fill, 230 yd3 of removal and recompaction, an aggregate grading quantity of 511 yd3, and 130 yd3 of export
Proposed Parking: 2 Garage, 1 Exterior
Proposed Fences and Walls: Yes
Proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit: No
Proposed Accessory Structure: No
Existing Development:

Single-story, single-family residence with
detached garage to be demolished
April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 3 of 13 ends

Staff has prepared draft findings for approval of the DRP in the attached Resolution 2022- 030 for Council’s consideration based upon the information in this report. The applicable SBMC sections are provided in italicized text and conditions from the Community Development, Engineering, and Fire Departments are incorporated in the Resolution of Approval. The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the Public Hearing process. If the Council determines the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.

The following is a discussion of the findings for a DRP as each applies to the proposed project as well as references to recommended conditions of approval contained in Resolution 2022-030.

Development Review Permit Compliance (SBMC Section 17.68.40):

A DRP is required because the proposed development includes grading in excess of 100 cubic yards, construction of a residence in excess of 60 percent of the maximum allowable floor area for the property, and construction of a second story that exceeds 35 percent of the first floor. In addition to meeting zoning requirements, the project must also be found in compliance with development review criteria. The following is a list of the development review criteria topics:

1. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses

2. Building and Structure Placement

3. Landscaping

4. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking, and Storage Areas

5. Grading

6. Lighting

7. Usable Open Space
The Council may approve, or conditionally approve, a DRP only if all of the findings listed below can be made. Resolution 2022-030 provides the full discussion of the findings.

1. The proposed development is consistent with the general plan and all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance including special regulations, overlay zones, and specific plans.

2. The proposed development complies with the development review criteria.

3. All required permits and approvals issued by the city, including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

4. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicants obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 4 of 13 ends

If the above findings cannot be made, the Council shall deny the DRP. The following is a discussion of the applicable development review criteria as they relate to the proposed project.

Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses:

The property is located within the LR Zone. Surrounding properties are also located within the LR Zone and are developed with a mixture of one- and two-story single-family residences. The project, as designed, is consistent with the permitted uses for the LR Zone as described in SBMC Sections 17.20.010 and 17.12.020. The property is designated Low Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for single-family residences developed at a maximum density of three dwelling units per acre. The proposed development could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the SROZ. The project has been evaluated and could be found to be in conformance with the regulations of the SROZ. The property is located in the Very High Fire Severity Zone, which requires additional development and construction regulations. The project is also located within the Coastal Zone. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant will be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver, or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of building or grading permits.

Building and Structure Placement:

The Applicant is proposing to demolish the existing residence and construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated improvements. The project would be located in the buildable area of the lot and the driveway access would be taken from Ford Avenue at the southwest corner of the front (south) property line.

The 2,354 square-foot first floor of the proposed residence would consist of the main entry, an open-concept living room, dining room, and kitchen with a pantry, and family room that wrap around an outdoor area and extend to a covered outdoor living room and kitchen that would be exempt from floor area. The first floor would also include a powder room and a bedroom with an ensuite bathroom. A mudroom on the first floor would also access a laundry room and bathroom as well as an attached 505 square-foot, two-car garage. The proposed 1,542 square-foot second floor would consist of the primary bedroom suite with a covered deck and two additional bedrooms each with ensuite bathrooms. There would also be 16 square feet of exterior covered area counting toward the gross floor area. There would be a pool and spa located in the northwest corner of the buildable area of the lot with pool equipment located on the west side of the rear yard.

April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 5 of 13 ends

The SBMC parking regulations require two off-street parking spaces per single-family residence. When required spaces are provided in a garage, 200 square feet of floor area is exempted for each required space. The proposed 505 square-foot attached garage would provide two unobstructed parking spaces; therefore, 400 square feet of the garage is exempt from the calculation of floor area. With the exemption, the total proposed floor area would be 4,017 square feet, which is 17 square feet below the maximum allowable floor area for the 11,854 square-foot lot located in the SROZ. The maximum allowable floor area calculation for this project, pursuant to the provisions of the SROZ, is as follows:

0.50 for first 6,000 ft2

0.175 for 6,000 to 15,000 ft2
3,000 ft2
1,025 ft2
Maximum Allowable Floor Area: 4,025 ft2
As designed, the project complies with all required setbacks. The residence would be setback 20 feet from the front (south) property line, 13 feet from the western side property line, 25 feet from the rear (north) property line, and 5 feet from the eastern side property line. The maximum building height for the LR Zone is 25 feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence would be 24.08 feet above the proposed grade with the highest portion of the structure to be at 320.00 feet above MSL. As designed, the project will comply with the required parking, maximum floor area, required setbacks, and maximum building height.

Neighborhood Comparison:

Staff compared the proposed project to 29 other properties within the surrounding area.

This area includes properties on the north and south sides of Ford Avenue, the south side of Canyon Drive, and the east and west sides of Marview Drive as shown on the map on the following page.

April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 6 of 13 ends

The properties evaluated in this comparison are also located in the LR Zone. The existing homes range in size from 1,488 square feet to 5,358 square feet, according to the County Assessor records. It should be noted that the County Assessor does not include the garage, covered porch area, unfinished basement, or non-habitable accessory building area in the total square footage. Accordingly, the building area of the proposed project has been calculated for comparison purposes by deleting the area of the proposed garage and the outdoor covered area:

Project Gross Building Area: 4,417 ft2
Delete Attached Garage: - 550 ft2
Delete Covered Patio: - 16 ft2
Project Area for Comparison to Assessor’s Data: 3,896 ft2 Table 2 is based upon the County Assessor’s data and SanGIS data. It contains neighboring lot sizes, the square footage of existing development and the maximum allowable square footage for potential development on each lot.

Table 2
# Property Address
Lot Size in
ft2
(GIS)
Existing ft2
Onsite
(Assessor’s)
Proposed /
Recently
Approved ft2
Max.

Allowable ,ft2 Zone
1 516 Ford Avenue 13,919 Vacant 3,863 4,386 LR
2 524 Ford Avenue 28,750 3,501 5,513 LR
3 536 Ford Avenue 23,958 2,311 5,273 LR
4 540 Ford Avenue 22,651 2,772 5,208 LR
5 548 Ford Avenue 21,800 3,573 5,165 LR
6 554 Ford Avenue 20,000 1,663 5,075 LR
7 558 Ford Avenue 17,800 2,194 3,855 LR
8 570 Ford Avenue 19,900 3,267 5,065 LR
9 505 Ford Avenue 13,000 4,550 4,225 LR
10 517 Ford Avenue N/A N/A N/A LR
11 525 Ford Avenue 11,854 1,612 3,896 4,025 LR
12 535 Ford Avenue 10,800 3,211 3,840 LR
13 545 Ford Avenue 12,500 1,934 4,138 LR
14 559 Ford Avenue 19,000 2,255 4,975 LR
15 501 Marview Drive 10,600 3,083 3,805 LR
16 521 Marview Drive 14,200 5,358 4,435 LR
17 525 Marview Drive 15,600 2,186 4,635 LR
18 469 Canyon Drive 16,100 3,912 4,685 LR
19 546 Marview Drive 13,700 1,606 3,348 LR
20 528 Marview Drive 15,700 2,180 4,645 LR
21 513 Canyon Drive 16,800 1,923 4,755 LR
22 521 Canyon Drive 14,170 N/A 4,264 4,430 LR
April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 7 of 13 ends

23 533 Canyon Drive 14,500 2,749 4,488 LR
24 477 Marview Drive 12,100 3,341 4,068 LR
25 459 Marview Drive 10,900 4,489 3,858 LR
26 445 Marview Drive 11,100 3,932 3,893 LR
27 476 Marview Drive 9,700 2,124 3,564 3,648 LR
28 464 Marview Drive 28,314 1,488 5,491 LR
29 452 Marview Drive 28,314 2,633 5,491 LR
30 448 Marview Drive 32,670 2,067 5,709 LR
Fences, Walls and Retaining Walls:

Within the front yard setback, the SBMC Section 17.20.040(O) allows fences and walls, or any combination thereof, to be no higher than 42 inches in height as measured from existing grade, except for an additional 2 feet that is at least 80% open to light. Fences, walls and retaining walls located within the rear and interior side yards are allowed to be up to 6 feet in height with an additional 2 feet that is 50% open to light and air.

The Applicant is proposing to construct a 3.5-foot high solid stucco wall with an additional 24-inch wrought iron top that would be 80 percent open to light located in the front-yard setback. A similar designed six-foot high perimeter fence would secure the rear yard.

Currently, the plans show fences and walls that comply with the requirements of SBMC

17.20.040(O) and 17.60.070(C). If the Applicant decides to modify any of the proposed fences and walls or construct additional fences and walls on the project site, a condition of project approval indicates that they would be required to be in compliance with the Municipal Code.

Landscape:

The project is subject to the current water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter 17.56. A Landscape Documentation Package is required for new development projects with an aggregate landscape equal to or greater than 500 square feet requiring a building permit, plan check or development review. The Applicant provided a conceptual landscape plan that has been reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect, who has recommended approval. The Applicant will be required to submit detailed construction landscape drawings that will be reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect for conformance with the conceptual plan. In addition, the City’s third-party landscape architect will perform an inspection during the construction phase of the project. A separate condition has been added to require that native or drought-tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water-conserving irrigation systems are required to be incorporated into the landscaping to the extent feasible.

Parking:

SBMC Section 17.52.040 and the Off-Street Parking Design Manual (OSPDM) require two (2) parking spaces for a single-family residence. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 505 square-foot attached garage in the southwest corner of the proposed April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 8 of 13 ends

residence with a third exterior parking space located immediately west of the garage and partially within the interior side-yard setback. The garage and exterior parking space would be accessed by a driveway on the southwest corner of the property from Ford Avenue. SBMC Section 17.08.030 indicates that required parking up to 200 square feet per parking space provided in a garage is exempt from the floor area calculation. The proposed garage will provide two 9-foot by 19-foot parking spaces that are clear of obstruction. Therefore, 400 square feet of garage area is exempt from the project’s total floor area calculation.

Grading:

Lighting:

A condition of project approval requires that all new exterior lighting fixtures comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.

Usable Open Space:

The project consists of the construction of a replacement single-family residence with an attached garage and associated site improvements on a developed residential lot, therefore, usable open space and recreational facilities are neither proposed nor required according to SBMC Section 17.20.040. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant will be required to pay the applicable Park Development Fee Structure Development Permit Compliance:

The proposed structure exceeds 16 feet in height above the existing grade, therefore, the project must comply with all of the View Assessment requirements of SBMC Chapter

17.63 and the Applicants were required to complete the SDP process. The original Story Pole Height Certification was certified by a licensed land surveyor on May 21, 2021, showing a maximum building height of 24.23 feet (320.33 feet above MSL) above the proposed grade. Notices were mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site establishing a deadline to file for View Assessment by July 19, 2021.

The City received one application for View Assessment (Attachment 3) from the property owner (Walt and Kris Edwards; “Claimant”) of 535 Ford Avenue, which is located immediately east of the subject property.

The project was presented to the View Assessment Commission (VAC) on September 19, 2021. The majority of the VAC members found the deck off of the master bedroom to be the primary viewing area and were unable to make findings 3, 4, and 5. Approved April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 9 of 13 ends

minutes from the September 19, 2021 meeting are included in Attachment 4. Table 3 below includes the disclosures and findings from the September 19, 2021 meeting.

Table 3
Cove Capital Properties
c/o Troy Foss Coad Bishop Cohen Moldenhauer Najjar Zajac Stribling Date
Visited
Claimant 9/15 & 9/20 9/18 9/19 9/18 9/18 9/18
Applicant 9/15 & 9/20 9/18 9/19 9/18 9/18 9/18
Primary
Viewing Area Deck Deck Bedroom Balcony
(Deck) Deck Deck
#1. Communication
Taken Place Y Y Y Y Y Y
#2. No Public View
Impairment Y Y Y Y Y Y
#3. Designed to
Minimize View
Impairment

N N N N N N
#4. No Cumulative View
Impairment N N N N N Y
#5. Neighborhood
Compatibility N Y N N Y N
The Applicant requested the VAC hearing to be continued until December 21, 2021. The December 21, 2021 meeting was cancelled due to a lack of quorum. The revised project plans were not submitted to Staff in time to be heard at the January 18, 2022 VAC meeting, therefore, it was continued again to the February 15, 2022 VAC meeting.

The Applicant reduced the overall size of the second floor by reducing the proposed living area by approximately 35 square feet and the deck area by approximately 195 square feet and by modifying the roof design thereby by lowering the maximum building height by 0.33 feet.

Updated story poles were installed and certified to reflect the revised design. The story poles were certified on February 7, 2022 and include a maximum building height of 24.08 feet (320.00 feet above MSL) above proposed grade. It should be noted that the original design presented to the VAC included errors in the measurements and calculation of floor area. The original design would have exceeded the maximum allowable floor area by approximately 34 square feet. The currently proposed design (also presented to the VAC on February 15, 2022) would be 8 square feet below the maximum allowable floor area for the property.

The VAC was unable to make the required findings to approve the revised project. The minutes for the February 15, 2022 have yet to be approved by the VAC. Table 4, on the following page, includes a draft of the disclosures and findings from the February 15, 2022 meeting.

April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 10 of 13 ends

Table 4
Cove Capital Properties
c/o Troy Foss Coad Bishop Cohen Moldenhauer Najjar Zajac Stribling Date
Visited
Claimant 2/11 ? 2/11 2/11 9/18
Applicant 9/18 9/18 9/18
Primary
Viewing Area
Master
Bedroom
Deck
Master
Bedroom
Deck
Master
Bedroom
Deck
Mater
Bedroom
Deck
Master
Bedroom
Deck
#1. Communication Taken
Place Y Y Y Y Y
#2. No Public View
Impairment Y Y Y Y Y
#3. Designed to Minimize
View Impairment Y N N N Y
#4. No Cumulative View
Impairment Y N N N Y
#5. Neighborhood
Compatibility Y Y N Y N
The majority of the VAC were unable to make findings 3 and 4. When offered a continuance, the Applicant did not consent and instead requested that the VAC make a recommendation.

Commissioner Zajac made a motion to recommend denial of the project; seconded by Commissioner Coad. Motion passed 4/1/1/1 Ayes: Bishop, Coad, Moldenhauer, Zajac. Noes:

Stribling. Absent: Cohen. Recused: Najjar due to living withing 500-feet of the property. The Notice of Recommendation is included in Attachment 5.

The project has not been modified since the February 15, 2022 VAC meeting. Project Plans dated February 3, 2022 are included in Attachment 2. The Applicant provided a request for approval of the DRP and SDP in Attachment 6.

The City Council should consider the recommendation from VAC, the information provided by the Applicants and Claimant, and the View Assessment Ordinance (SBMC

17.63) including the definition of a “Viewing Area” and the five required findings, which are provided below:

SBMC Section 17.63.020(I): “Viewing area” shall be that area of the structure (excluding bathrooms, hallways, garages or closets) or lot (excluding the building setback areas) where the view assessment committee, or the city council on appeal, determines the best and most important view exists. The finished floor elevation of any viewing area must be at or above existing grade adjacent to the exterior wall of the part of the building nearest to that viewing area. The determination shall be made by balancing the nature of the view to be protected and the importance of the area of the structure or lot from where the view is taken.

April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 11 of 13 ends

SBMC Section 17.63.040(F): Findings. In making a decision on a matter for which view assessment has been requested, the view assessment committee shall be required to make the following findings:

1. The applicant for the structure development permit has made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the person(s) requesting view assessment. Written evidence of a good faith voluntary offer to meet and discuss view issues, or of a good faith voluntary offer to submit the matter to mediation, is hereby deemed to be a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues.

2. The proposed structure does not significantly impair a view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bike ways, walkways, equestrian trails) which has been identified in the city’s general plan, local coastal program, or city designated viewing areas.

3. The structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

4. There is no significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application. Cumulative view impairment shall be determined by: (a) Considering the amount of view impairment caused by the proposed structure; and (b) considering the amount of view impairment that would be caused by the construction on other parcels of structures similar to the proposed structure.

5. The proposed structure is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

A condition of approval has been added to the Draft Resolution of Approval (Attachment 1) to require that the Applicants submit a height certification prepared by a licensed land surveyor prior to the framing inspection certifying that the maximum height of the proposed addition will not exceed 24.08 feet above the proposed grade or 320.00 feet above MSL, which is the maximum proposed structure height reflected on the project plans.

The Draft Resolution of Approval (Attachment 1) reflects the Applicant’s request that the City Council consider the findings of the SDP and includes findings in support of the DRP.

The Draft Resolution of Approval includes the applicable SBMC sections in italicized text and the recommended conditions of approval from the Community Development, Engineering, and Fire Departments. An additional condition of approval requires that the Applicants obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of Building or Grading Permits. The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the public hearing process. If the Council determines the project April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 12 of 13 ends

is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.

Property Frontage and Public Right-of-Way Improvements
The existing property frontage is unimproved. Currently, the area between the edge of pavement and property line consists of a gravel area. If approved, the Applicant will be required to replace the gravel area with a ten-foot wide decomposed granite (D.G.) pathway and a concrete mountable curb along the entire property frontage. The Applicant will also be required to construct a new driveway approach.

Public Hearing Notice:

Notice of the City Council Public Hearing for the project was published in the Union Tribune more than 10 days prior to the public hearing. The same public notice was mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project site on March 31, 2022. The two adjacent neighbors have raised concerns with the proposed project.

The Edwards filed for View Assessment on the project and live immediately to the east at 535 Ford Avenue. Their correspondence is included in Attachment 7. The Kings live immediately to the west at 517 Ford Avenue and provided feedback at the first VAC meeting. Their correspondence is included in Attachment 8.

In conclusion, the proposed project, as conditioned, could be found to be consistent with the Zoning regulations and the General Plan. Staff has prepared draft findings for approval of the project in the attached Resolution 2022-030 for Council’s consideration based upon the information in this report. Conditions from the Community Development, Engineering, and Fire Departments are incorporated in the Resolution of Approval.

The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the Public Hearing process. If the Council determines the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Examples of this exemption include one single-family residence or second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three-single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:

April 13 2022
DRP20-006/SDP20-010
525 Ford Ave – Cove Capital Properties

Page 13 of 13 ends

∙ Approve Staff recommendation adopting the attached Resolution 2022-030. ∙ Approve Staff recommendation subject to additional specific conditions necessary for the City Council to make all required findings for the approval of a DRP. ∙ Deny the project if all required findings for the DRP and cannot be made.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

The proposed project meets the minimum zoning requirements under the SBMC, may be found to be consistent with the General Plan and may be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings required as discussed in this report to approve a DRP.

Therefore, should the City Council be able to make the findings to approve the SDP, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2022-030 conditionally approving a DRP and SDP to demolish a singlefamily residence, construct a replacement 4,017 square-foot, two-story singlefamily residence with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 525 Ford Avenue, Solana Beach.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2022-030

2. Project Plans

3. Edwards Application for View Assessment

4. VAC Minutes from September 19, 2021 Meeting

5. NOR from February 15, 2022 VAC Meeting

6. Applicant’s Request for Approval

7. Correspondence – Edwards at 535 Ford

8. Correspondence – Kings at 517 Ford
RESOLUTION 2020-030

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT AND

STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEMOLISH A

SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE, CONSTRUCT A

REPLACEMENT TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE

WITH AN ATTACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE, AND PERFORM
ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT 525 FORD AVENUE,

SOLANA BEACH
APPLICANT: Cove Capital Properties
CASE NO.: DRP20-006/SDP20-010
WHEREAS, Cove Capital Properties (care of Troy Foss) (hereinafter referred to as “Applicant”), has submitted an application for a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SDP) pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and
WHEREAS, the View Assessment Committee recommended denial of the project on February 15, 2022 based on an Application for View Assessment from 535 Ford Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on April 13, 2022, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application; and WHEREAS, the City Council determined the primary viewing area to be ____________; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found the application request exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

I. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

II. That the request for a DRP and SDP to demolish a single-story single-family residence, construct a replacement 3,912 square-foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached 505 square-foot two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 525 Ford Avenue is conditionally approved based upon the following Findings and subject to the following Conditions:

Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 2 of 14 ends

III. FINDINGS
A. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permit) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

I. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of SBMC Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance), including special regulations, overlay zones and specific plans.

General Plan Consistency: The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City’s General Plan designation of Low Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for single-family residential development with a maximum density of three dwelling units per acre. The development is also consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

Zoning Ordinance Consistency: The project is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) (SBMC 17.20.030 and

17.48.040), which delineates maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR), Permitted Uses and Structures (SBMC Section 17.20.020) which provides for uses of the property for a single-family residence. Further, the project adheres to all property development regulations established for the Low Residential (LR) Zone and cited by SBMC Section 17.020.030.

The project is meets the minimum number of off-street parking spaces and the required front-, side- and rear-yard setbacks and is below the maximum allowable structure height and gross floor area for the property.

II. The proposed development complies with the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section

17.68.040.F:
a. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses: The development shall be designed in a manner compatible with and complementary to existing development in the immediate vicinity of the project site and the surrounding neighborhood. The development as
proposed shall also be compatible in scale, apparent bulk, and massing with such existing development in the surrounding neighborhood. Site planning on or near the perimeter of the development shall give consideration to the protection of surrounding areas from potential adverse effects.

The subject site is located within the Low Residential (LR) Zone.

The surrounding neighborhood consists of a mix of one-and twostory single-family residences. The project site is currently Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 3 of 14 ends

developed with a single-story, single-family residence and a detached garage. The Applicant proposes to demolish the existing residence and site improvements and construct a replacement two-story single-family residence with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements.

As designed, the project is consistent with the permitted uses for the LR Zone as described in Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) Sections 17.20.010 and 17.12.020, which permits one single-family residence. The property is designated Low Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for single-family residences developed at a maximum density of three dwelling units per acre. The proposed development could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy
residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated
neighborhoods.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the SROZ and within the Coastal Zone. The project has been evaluated, and is in conformance with, the regulations of the SROZ. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant is required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
b. Building and Structure Placement: Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed to minimize adverse impacts on the surrounding properties and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhance their intended use and complement existing site topography. Multi-family residential buildings shall be sited to avoid crowding and to allow for a functional use of the space between buildings.

The Applicant is proposing to demolish the existing residence and construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated improvements. The project will be located in the buildable area of the lot and the driveway access would be taken from Ford Avenue at the southwest corner of the front (south) property line.

The 2,354 square-foot first floor of the proposed residence will consist of the main entry, an open-concept living room, dining room, and kitchen with a pantry, and family room that wrap around an outdoor area and extend to a covered outdoor living room and kitchen that will be exempt from floor area. The first Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 4 of 14 ends

floor will also include a powder room and a bedroom with an ensuite bathroom. A mudroom on the first floor will also access a laundry room and bathroom as well as an attached 505
square-foot, two-car garage. The proposed 1,542 square-foot second floor will consist of the primary bedroom suite with a covered deck and two additional bedrooms each with ensuite bathrooms. There will also be 16 square feet of exterior covered area counting toward the gross floor area. There will be a pool and spa located in the northwest corner of the buildable area of the lot with pool equipment located on the west side of the rear yard.

The SBMC parking regulations require two off-street parking spaces per single-family residence. When required spaces are provided in a garage, 200 square feet of floor area is exempted for each required space. The proposed 505 square-foot attached garage will provide two unobstructed parking spaces; therefore, 400 square feet of the garage is exempt from the calculation of floor area. With the exemption, the total proposed floor area is 4,017 square feet, which is 17 square feet below the maximum allowable floor area for the 11,854 square-foot lot located in the SROZ. The maximum allowable floor area calculation for this project, pursuant to the provisions of the SROZ, is as follows:

0.500 for first 6,000 ft2 3,000 ft2

0.175 for 6,001 – 15,000 ft2 1,025 ft2
Total Allowable Floor Area: 4,025 ft2
As designed, the project complies with all required setbacks. The residence will be setback 20 feet from the front (south) property line, 13 feet from the western side property line, 25 feet from the rear (north) property line, and 5 feet from the eastern side property line. The maximum building height for the LR Zone is 25 feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence would be 24.08 feet above the proposed grade with the highest portion of the structure to be at 320.00 feet above MSL. As designed, the project will comply with the required parking, maximum floor area, required setbacks, and maximum building height.
c. Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area. To the maximum extent practicable, landscaping and plantings shall be used to screen parking areas, storage areas, access roads, and other service uses of the site. Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.

Drought tolerant plant materials and water conserving irrigation systems shall be incorporated into all landscaping plans.

Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 5 of 14 ends

The project is subject to the current water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter 17.56. According to SBMC
Section 17.56.040, the regulations apply to modified irrigated landscape areas that exceed 500 square feet. The Applicant proposes to modify 2,270 square feet of irrigated landscape area.

The Applicant provided a conceptual landscape plan that has been reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect, who has recommended approval. The Applicant will be required to submit detailed construction landscape drawings that will be reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect for conformance with the conceptual plan. In addition, the City’s third-party landscape architect will perform inspections during the construction phase of the project. A separate condition has been added to require that native or drought-tolerant and noninvasive plant materials and water-conserving irrigation systems are required to be incorporated into the landscaping to the extent feasible.
d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas: Any development involving more than one building or structure shall provide common access roads and pedestrian walkways. Parking and outside storage areas, where permitted, shall be screened from view, to the extent feasible, by existing topography, by the placement of buildings and structures, or by landscaping and plantings.

SBMC Section 17.52.040 and the Off-Street Parking Design Manual (OSPDM) require two (2) parking spaces for a singlefamily residence. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 505 square foot attached garage in the southwest corner of the proposed residence with a third exterior parking space located immediately west of the garage and partially within the interior side-yard setback. The garage and exterior parking space would be accessed by a driveway on the southwest corner of the property from Ford Avenue. SBMC Section 17.08.030 indicates that required parking up to 200 square feet per parking space provided in a garage is exempt from the floor area calculation.

The proposed garage will provide two 9-foot by 19-foot parking spaces that are clear of obstruction. Therefore, 400 square feet of garage area is exempt from the project’s total floor area calculation.
e. Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving operations Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 6 of 14 ends

in connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.

The proposed grading quantities include 200 cubic yards of cut, 70 cubic yards of fill, 230 cubic yards of removal and
recompaction, an aggregate grading quantity of 511 cubic yards, and 130 cubic yards of export off site. The proposed grading would create a flat building pad at 296.33 feet above MSL and construct drainage improvements including a bio retention basin located in the southeast portion of the front yard.
f. Lighting: Light fixtures for walkways, parking areas, driveways, and other facilities shall be provided in sufficient number and at proper locations to assure safe and convenient nighttime use.

All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding areas per SBMC 17.60.060 (Exterior Lighting Regulations).

All new exterior lighting fixtures shall comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC

17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area. g. Usable Open Space: Recreational facilities proposed within required usable open space shall be located and designed to maintain essential open space values.

The project consists of the construction of a replacement singlefamily residence with an attached garage and associated site improvements on a developed residential lot, therefore, usable open space and recreational facilities are neither proposed nor required according to SBMC Section 17.20.040.

III. All required permits and approvals including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

All required permits are being processed concurrently with the Development Review Permit.

IV. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 7 of 14 ends

approve the development review permit upon the Applicants obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

The Applicant shall obtain approval from the California Coastal Commission prior to issuance of Building or Grading Permits.

B. In accordance with Chapter 17.63 (Structure Development Permit) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

I. The Applicant for the Structure Development Permit has made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the person(s) requesting view assessment. Written evidence of a good faith voluntary offer to meet and discuss view issues, or of a good faith voluntary offer to submit the matter to mediation, is hereby deemed to be a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues.

To be completed based on Council findings.

II. The proposed structure does not significantly impair a view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bike ways, walkways, equestrian trails) which has been identified in the city’s general plan, local coastal program, or city designated viewing areas.

To be completed based on Council findings.

III. The structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

To be completed based on Council findings.

IV. There is no significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application. Cumulative view impairment shall be determined by: (a) Considering the amount of view impairment caused by the proposed structure; and (b) considering the amount of view impairment that would be caused by the construction on other parcels of structures similar to the proposed structure.

To be completed based on Council findings.

V. The proposed structure is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

To be completed based on Council findings.

IV. CONDITIONS
Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicant shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 8 of 14 ends

A. Community Development Department Conditions:

I. The Applicant shall pay required Fire Mitigation, Park Development and Public Use Facilities Impact Fees, as established by SBMC Chapter 15.60, Chapter 15.65, Chapter 15.66, and Resolution 2018- 147.

II. Building Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the architectural plans presented to the City Council on April 13, 2022, and located in the project file with a submittal date of February 3, 2022.

III. Prior to requesting a framing inspection, the Applicant shall be required to submit a height certification, signed by a licensed land surveyor, certifying that the building envelope is in conformance with City Council approval on April 13, 2022, and that the maximum height of the proposed addition will not exceed 24.08 feet above the proposed grade or 320.00 feet above MSL, which is the maximum proposed structure height reflected on the project plans.

IV. Any proposed onsite fences, walls and retaining walls and any proposed railing located on top, or any combination thereof, shall comply with applicable regulations of SBMC Section 17.20.040 and

17.60.070 (Fences and Walls).

V. The Applicant shall obtain required California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval of a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption as determined necessary by the CCC, prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.

VI. Native or drought tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water conserving irrigation systems shall be incorporated into any proposed landscaping and compatible with the surrounding area to the extent feasible.

VII. Any new exterior lighting fixtures shall be in conformance with the CityWide Lighting Regulations of SBMC 17.60.060.

VIII. All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities that render them detrimental to the surrounding area.

IX. Construction vehicles shall be parked on the subject property at all times when feasible. If construction activity prohibits parking on the subject property, the Applicant shall ensure construction vehicles are parked in such a way to allow sufficient vehicular access on Marview Drive and Ford Ave and minimize impact to the surrounding neighbors.

X. The Applicant shall connect to temporary electrical service as soon as Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 9 of 14 ends

feasible to the satisfaction of the City.

B. Fire Department Conditions:

I. ACCESS ROAD MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed improved width of not less than 20 feet; curb line to curb line, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Exception: Single-Family residential driveways; serving no more than two single-family dwellings, shall have minimum of 16 feet, curb line to curb line, of unobstructed improved width. Access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of not less than 75,000 pounds and shall be provided with an approved paved surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities.

II. GATES: All gates or other structures or devices, which could obstruct fire access roadways or otherwise hinder emergency operations, are prohibited unless they meet standards approved by the Fire Department. An approved emergency key-operated switch and/or an approved emergency traffic control-activating strobe light sensor shall be installed per Solana Beach Fire Department standards.

III. OBSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION: All
roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width during construction and maintained free and clear, including the parking of vehicles, in accordance with the California Fire Code and the Solana Beach Fire Department.

IV. FIRE HYDRANTS AND FIRE FLOWS: The applicant shall provide fire hydrants of a type, number, and location satisfactory to the Solana Beach Fire Department. A letter from the water agency serving the area shall be provided that states the required fire flow is available.

Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type. Multi-family residential or industrial fire hydrants shall have two (2) 4” inch and two (2) 2 ½” inch NST outlets. Residential fire hydrants shall have one (1) 4” inch NST outlet, and one (1) 2 ½” inch NST outlets.

V. FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES/FIRE BREAKS: The applicant shall provide and maintain fire/fuel breaks to the satisfaction of the Solana Beach Fire Department. Fire/fuel breaks size and composition shall be determined by the Fire Department and shown on the improvement /grading plans and final map and building plans.

VI. ADDRESS NUMBERS: STREET NUMBERS: Approved numbers
and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate additional locations as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from either direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background and shall Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 10 of 14 ends

meet the following minimum standards as to size: 4 inches high with a ½ inch stroke width for residential buildings, 8 inches high with a ½ inch stroke for commercial and multi-family residential buildings, and 12 inches high with a 1 inch stroke for industrial buildings. Additional numbers shall be required where deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear access doors, building corners, and entrances to commercial centers.

VII. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS SYSTEM-ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS: Structures shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system designed and installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.

VIII. FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR
WILDLAND/URBAN INTERFACE AREAS: Structures shall meet all wildland/urban interface standards to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Structures shall comply with current California Building Code Chapter 7A.

IX. CLASS “A” ROOF: All structures shall be provided with a Class “A” Roof covering to the satisfaction of the Solana Beach Fire Department.

C. Engineering Department Conditions:

I. The Applicant is required to obtain an Encroachment Permit in accordance with SBMC Section 11.20 for the below frontage improvements being done in the public right-of-way. The frontage improvements shall be done to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the proposed project:
a. Construction of a 9” X 9” X 12” concrete curb along the property frontage with transitions to the existing improvements on both ends to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
b. Construction of the overflow drains discharging from the detention basin to street.
c. Installation of a 10-foot wide D.G area compacted and graded at 2% towards the flow line for walking and parking purposes. d. Construction of a San Diego Regional Standard Drawing (SDRSD) driveway approach.
e. Construction of approximately 7.25-foot wide landscaping area.

II. The Applicant shall record the Encroachment Maintenance Removal Agreement (EMRA) with the County of San Diego prior to the release of the Grading Bond and Security Deposit. The EMRA shall be Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 11 of 14 ends

recorded against this property for all private improvements in the Public Right-Of-Way including but not limited to:
a. Overflow drains discharging from the detention basin to street. b. Pervious paver driveway approach.

III. All construction demolition materials shall be recycled according to the City’s Construction and Demolition recycling program and an approved Waste Management Plan shall be submitted.

IV. Construction fencing shall be located on the subject property unless the Applicant has obtained an Encroachment Permit in accordance with chapter 11.20 of the SBMC which allows otherwise.

GRADING:

I. Obtain a Grading Permit in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code. Conditions prior to the issuance of a grading permit shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. The grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. On-site grading design and construction shall be in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code.
b. The Applicant shall obtain a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. On-site grading design and construction shall be in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code.
c. The Applicant shall obtain a Soils Report prepared by a Registered Soils Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. All necessary measures shall be taken and implemented to assure slope stability, erosion control and soil integrity. The grading plan shall incorporate all recommendations contained in the soils report. d. The Applicant shall provide a Drainage Report prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. This report shall address the design for detention basin and corresponding outflow system to ensure the rate of runoff for the proposed development is at or below that of pre-existing condition. All recommendations of this report shall be incorporated into the Preliminary Grading Plan. A detention basin easement(s) shall be recorded for maintenance of the detention basins by the property owner(s) in perpetuity, prior to Final Inspection of the Building Permit.
e. The Applicant shall show all retaining walls and drainage structures. Retaining walls shown on the grading plan shall Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 12 of 14 ends

conform to the San Diego Regional Standards or be designed by a licensed civil engineer. Engineering calculations for all designed walls with a surcharge and nonstandard walls shall be submitted at grading plan check. Retaining walls may not exceed the allowable height within the property line setback as determined by the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code. Contact the Community
Development department for further information.
f. The Applicant is responsible to protect the adjacent properties during construction. If any grading, construction activity, access or potential construction-related impacts are anticipated beyond the property lines, as determined by the City Engineer, the Applicant shall obtain a letter of permission from the adjoining property owners. All required letters of permission shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the grading permit. g. The Applicant shall pay a grading plan check fee in accordance with the current Engineering Fee Schedule at initial grading plan submittal. Inspection fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the grading permit.
h. The Applicant shall obtain and submit grading security in a form prescribed by the City Engineer.
i. The Applicant shall obtain haul permit for import / export of soil.

The Applicant shall transport all excavated material to a legal disposal site.
j. The Applicant shall submit certification from the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer that all public or private drainage facilities and finished grades are functioning and are installed in accordance with the approved plans. This shall be accomplished by the Engineer of Record incorporating as-built conditions on the Mylar grading plans and obtaining signatures of the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer certifying the as-built conditions. k. An Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan shall be prepared by the Applicant. Best management practices shall be developed and implemented to manage storm water and non-storm water discharges from the site at all times during excavation and grading activities. Erosion prevention shall be emphasized as the most important measure for keeping sediment on site during excavation and grading activities. Sediment controls shall be used as a supplement to erosion prevention for keeping sediment on site.
l. The Applicant shall show all proposed on-site private drainage facilities intended to discharge water run-off. Elements of this design shall include a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis verifying Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 13 of 14 ends

the adequacy of the facilities and identify any easements or structures required to properly convey the drainage. The construction of drainage structures shall comply with the standards set forth by the San Diego Regional Standard Drawings.
m. Post Construction Best Management Practices meeting City and RWQCB Order No. R9-2013-001 requirements shall be
implemented in the drainage design.
n. Prior to obtaining a building permit, submit a building pad certification statement from a soils engineer and an engineer or land surveyor licensed in Land Surveying per SBMC 15.40.230E. o. No increased cross lot drainage shall be allowed.

D. COUNCIL CONDITIONS
I. N/A
V. ENFORCEMENT
Pursuant to SBMC 17.72.120(B) failure to satisfy any and all of the abovementioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SBMC Chapters 1.1.6 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.

VI. EXPIRATION
The Development Review Permit for the project shall expire 24 months from the date of this Resolution, unless the Applicant has obtained building permits and has commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the application may be granted by the City Council according to SBMC 17.72.110.

VII. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney’s fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification.

In the event of such election, the Applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event of a Resolution 2022-030
DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties – 525 Ford Ave.

Page 14 of 14 ends

disagreement between the City and Applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter.

However, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicant.

NOTICE TO APPLICANT: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 13th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:

Site Grading - Cut 200 yd3
Site Grading-Fill 70 yd3
Excavation for Footings 11 yd3
Removal & Recompaction 230 yd3
Aggregate Total Grading- 511yd3
1 ·
Export- 130 yd3 I ;.- l
i
I
I --·
,I
:I
-·. ~, ' cc
~- . "
0wtl,\l'\irlC
_fr,:.11-
.. c:=. ' I ~ I
I "f,\
- ~---_·--=...,.=-~=r.i=::...==..."'=..':..'=-"=-1"-':'..~"'S.'.!tl I
I .
- -- . ' .... ···
I I
i
·I
I
' I\
'\Li i~j 5r 'Z
~ ",.._Q,f.

N-s;
~
~ fL
IL
-M,oDf-,. /,.,,P..'i:A o,ALGUl/1 r 1:;;...j ·. +=-= ----···--··· - ..... - =4 ..
7rlP<,'.;,T f\-Xf'- LIYIHc- A F,Ei,
'9W<1NP FW(71>-. L!\/liJ1 A~ . tj,',,f4<_0f:
i:x11;cti;1::;:r,,_ <::o-..JE--F-E'r,- AP.M
-:'1{~
1E FAP.ILIN<'.:, E)(.Ec//,f'flON •
=,- .:.f<JfA\.. f'RO!"D.'-EiP ~\,CO~ t\RS-h: -- . - . -- . . ~KP ft..cOf, P,-:;::;jfL- APt:;,{.'c.,.,
"h<(C,
-tttl MN\/('"i' Of ~ if:~1:
'2,=3 <,+, DO <ff,
1i-;4;t.C'.X7 #
i;;o~.QO tpFt
lai,oo 1'I'
- 400, O(? 'i?l'l
4,C?i],W'i'F
've-MO li=-Xl{;T[>--JG JC, IZ: ';'.'F. f(~iPE:N'-':::- l CGN?--T!'<i.\OT A N";;'y,./ rwo:·""'wr'i" ~<c1~r1ce w/ ,z erAF- a.,_\AA'.~:=-, re:::!"-- Ar=--,,'6, e., -r,.Je ",;'.e:&CHI? F~f.. ,-Je'Y-i foot.. t -&fl'. - Exist. S.F. Proposed S.F.

Non-Landscaped Area 3,057 6,850
Non-Irrigated landscape 1,320 0
Irrigated landscape 7,458 2,730
Water features 0 595
Decorative hardscape 0 1,670 (Art ificial turf)
TOTAL LOT AREA 11,845 11,845
Area of work
S.F
Irrigated landscane 2730
Water features 595
Decorative Hardscape 1,670 {Artificial turf)
Aggregate Landscape Area 4,995
~ ....
0 0 Ol N Q) 0) ,·
C O}
0 ll)
~
u, ~')('
C m Q,) ...J LL·
+" . .J ......,
~~l?-\,-.COJ . co ·o ..., 11114--Z.. ~~ ,·a <t C. 0 .J
(/) Q
<( "' UJ
I06 U)
. L.. c:i . (I) ~ 0 a;
C
(I) (,/)
IU 0. z
,00 it ~ . ~ co
<( co a: 1
~ a: m0 g 'SI'
'.M o.
-(0,
;i
..... ~
~----· - ..._ _.,____
.
0 '
~
j <
l
---·-----
::::r:~ -CO'JF;f'J=-.J:2 Aff::A
~~;i=r. ·::..:. -.::-·
a_ n --P 11------ : . ~~i-. I Ir
1 I i
j I
I :
1F
I l
0o'•(pll
I '·'i'.?"
\
-
Q
'
- -· - ~,~ ,, .. ',, :~, -~~ 11
~~!:'!='1=1:!~-IL-· 1) ~ I
- , I
1'J
c"- , . --~~~".~ '~"" <
!~~-===¼::::=t~=-~~;.=:~=E::£~E~~~~~ +----'--,.

Q
w
ln
cS
g
a:

UJ
w
z
s:, ~
> co w co a: I
a: O)_
~ ~
oi
~ e
[----; _------7
I"~ I .1 _~ -~
I '. ~ (\\
I
·--··-·------------------------~
I
I
l---------
7 l
.1
\
I
-l- \
\
\
;
=
r-----. ""
!<ev(';71~
ffi NO-,J •., I ,ZOZj
,.,~ OJI EP.
·- I C':l ....
~i
< cir1
o~·
(/) 5i· s ..I u..
o- (tl .., ,·a :3 o·
UJ , C u, . "<( /JJ
10CS ti; '
"M
L.. a
Q)
I 0' ~ g;;
z;~ c· en
.8. w z
·(/): a:.~
. tfl. Cai' l8 a: I
~ t:C OIi
~ ~- .g - (/) '.I""-
=··fir ;ee,
~!:cf:T
JAt§J ...

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
. I
-t-----·--_·-----_. ___ ··_··_·--_··-____ -!5..___!,-+ . ! -- -- . 320,00
I ·-scoff A. Sj)enqer ·g·Assqciates · . '
\ ' \
,110 TORREY PINES ROAD, STE· Di LA JOLLA, CA 92037
(858):459 ~ 8898 . · . (Fax:)459, - 8901
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 I
I
l
l
I
l
l
l
~R ;§~ ~ 71.
j~ f_J ~ ;z.1:\. -,,,
! '~ i~
ff-
"ii
-·
LIN1= Of £:XWT!N0
4"Jr-il e, T ll r--f.,
fHt Of !::Al
I,. . "'o!'I.,~
~or-'2"1€.oo
~">)
\ \ v, 1 Fl \1• ' G i'-M_;f
~UN2 at l'd-l~)!"Jf-!C,,
".::'1' ftUc11Jf".l;,
- 't/9.Jv ,:;t,1 p - WJNvJW,· trf. _ _:,_
1 !:NCP-CA,HIAE:N'T
~~s,=:-=-f-=._=::_~-=-=_-_-=_.:."""'t-----1 bt!l::=~~~~~ft~:l+j- -Ai::t. wo=:;r:> TFlll,\ 1v.-L.ll/A11v _ !,:TC. vt1Ti\.-1Nt Of !:'.Xl'i'llN&
~crur--1;
'310,0,
-'2.'°l(io/lo
n~otff · <bOUTf-\ l::lJ;V,b. TION
INE OF E:Xl,;:11\N&
L-IN!?' ~ EXl0T\N0
"'?TR!CjUF-l:
_17, . t:J ?t:JS, "" ~rz-i,,,i;.;,
I
--+-I-=-,/,._...:,+- ?>11,0'7
'
..:_,s-,1._;,\l2Tf;L <?TArlPJli&
~AM r:<a:'f-•
' E\,l:V, ;- 90;.;.C:O
Rl:N\";:'l~?rj-,,
f1N,J,2C7:!.j
t'F-" ~ OvJ N'/:R
Pl:i'.;. lh'Z0-21
lt&rE'?-o«rlicfl-
~ .... , Si i1 I I
< cnt
(.) ~·
CJ) ex".
s :I&..
oco -,
:a :s ou,. ' Q u,
:·<(_ LLI
.... ( -
0() CJ> •J
-~ L- aa, g I(.)! a:

C (J)
-~
w
z
Cl) ii'.~
. >--· I <( ~-II
~ ~, ·s t- ·----
8-,;, - "' ,..._
=
l"'l/o<., 12'1
lcNCR 00!-l·
~tr .o~
~1,00--
-l. I
I
~
1'2. lQ< l?Ol,00
, •1!,--,, 10
\tz
l!lL'-"L:~ .• "'f~'f -~1~~;,.i
, 1~t.:f COMfDe,lT ION
<;,f4I r-l&ic:0
--------WOv', ct.,1,.r?
W)..}Oov-l?.e'
~ ,op . .,,oe,.oo
f.JO'T",'Z":X,,1&
UHE, ()F, ~""T'IN(; ~ue,rLlJ'l.ii:
·-:=--'!';A0T 01'1; EL.EVATION
TO. °?0~,0 eor. ':2%:i,-:,::i
y./OC(? .,;1r,i, &
i-¼ftPI· P-(~~
Cl)
(I)
.....
. ca
:•c3
-oCl)
Cl)
<(
oes
· 1...

Cl)
(.)
C
(I)
a.
;Cl)
<i:
iQ =
! (.)
::en
""' .... . (')
0 ~- CII CX)
O> I
< C)
0 I.I)
'ii'
< x . ..J 8!_. I 5 __. -,
<
..J.
a
w
Iu, (
'---'
ci
g
a;;
UJ
w
z
it. ~ ·► CX)
LU. co
a: I
.a: ~- ~ """
0 --
CX)
... LC)
;: e
/ ~ ~ ~~ ~
---~ra::Ir:~ ~'4"- -'rJ;:\';:;' .. -- ~,.' '1.,1.;{)'j"c,.·.~'2.Qo,Q'.? ! i11 .-:2~1.nr r j;()'f,-..0)7/ ~"'1'. i",i,",1- ' ~· ~~ 1-1. 'I I ~- "2~:,..c,o I ____ ___, __ __,. ---3_io, :.
··' -----=·c--•· _ ___=::~~~:-;;==_-~--=---=---:-=-- .. -:.~----~ .. -. ,-~~/LT•"°Mf. -'Jlcop Fl.FT, TAIL".,
()'E,/1-.,/E:~.
- TEii\ r, CJJV;C,,
c,,LJAF--DFVIII..
-
, ~F="\/1-!:>1t?l'IC:, ! . ' . -m,-]Sl:~7.::-t'.[ov~--;?ZO~ ~-~.:._~OWt!~=-
6 ;~,14-,'Ulo:!I
LU IN? ff;F-,0,'/l{eF.
n
__ _ F'R'7P, LIN/;;_~~-..---
oJ
A'IIE
~,,1~
-IL
]i1
~!!~
'I~
111
I.

I~
I
J' "'
!b
lq
;!
,. ~ £ .\
~11 \j I
. i
i=
ifi
C)
T<
.j II!
~
i 1W- .
~ ~l~- rm

1.,, '71!
.-=1
1 :, ~l
,"" ,,.. I • - r
JtlLI: 1 ·-o'ff •.ol-'z'.'
~ z+ .. s-o1
~
~
-4-
--n
y
.,.
~I
i -J. fORJ:? /.\VEtlJ)r;
i
~
I,.
' 111t:
i
I
I
i
.. S_¢6tt A. Spenqec&.Associates
--z.·?·:, 1 •• ,_:ji1
-·z,i;,,d_
10 1-oY-:i' I ,•1, \ '-o~,,
~.)'i.48.
$~K.-
..II llll 0 - ;--1 I~
Zi\ l:i ~
l j
~
- 4- /'
~71'
i!;l,·!1:,. I···:

R . ll
1~-
"')
rh·
--<-:i, ~ ' nl 871
,..,,
s
8 '
·- Lt. -
11 ll·j~,~ i 1,- . . I~ -
~
,,..
!i
~ --J
2 2::
..,, ,,
~ ~n-~.i;.
>.It
~
w
)\
~ I·
t s)t_ .
()""-;
~~, ~ r;
() . :1110 TORREY PINES ROAD, STE· D . LA JOLLA, CA 92037 .1858))4~-~ 8898 (Fax)45$,- 8901
~
;i~2
l ~ I -~G
~<'I :z:.
)l ~ ~
:~
LOT 11 /
LOT 7
/ u/1.ISS
(WW,£ 291.lt
LOT 9 / 293,01
PA\1HG ,c/ 1(293.51
m10 /
/•292.62
/
2:91.56 '7 Ii PAw;/;
x:!92.32
/
/
1 INCH - 10 ff.H

GRAPHIC SCALE

LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS
---- Pl?OP£RTY LIN<
• FOUND 1/2" REBAR AND CAP "LS 8785" PfJI MAP NO. 2132g ~ --29&-~ EXISTING CONTOURS AT 1' INTERVALS
~ EDGE: OF ASPHALT PAVING

AC ASPHALT

EIRK BRICK CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE
CONC CONCRE:TE DWY DFllll£WAY FF FINISH FLOOR
LS LANDSCAPEI! ARF:A
TFI TRff TW TOP OF WALL llf" WOOD FENCE 11+.1 WA 1E'R 1.1rrrn BENCH MARK CITY OF SOLANA B£ACH CONIROL POINT NO. 2010 PER ROS NO. 18971. 2.5" CITY OF ENCINITAS BRASS DISK ST.AMPED ·mc-4S !. s. 7J22" IN THE NORTH\IEST
CORNER OF CONCRE"TE D.~OP /1/LE:T 111 1HE' NOR'THV£<;T
QUADRANT Of THE INTERSECTION OF SAN TA Hf.J.£NA AND SANTA ROSA S71?EETS. l'UVA TION; 170,24-1 Ferr (NAW 86)

GENERAL NOTES

1.) BOUNDARY SHOIIN HEREON IS 8A5m ON A FIE:LD SURVEY AND RE:CORO DA TA PER IJAP NO. 2829. 2,) ASS!'.SSOR'S PA~CEL NUI./Bffi: 253-191-09.

J.) LOT AREA: 11,856 SQUARE FEET / 0.27 ACRE
~
0 N 0
iol Iii ~ r~ I~ "'o 15"' 50
LO
>- I'-
w 0
> wN
er: ::) (J)
::::> z<
if) ~o
u <(
I
:r:: 00
(l_ O:'.: <(
<( ow
er: LL>
0 LO <(
0 Nz
(l_ LO <(
0 _J
I- 0
~ (f)
t;
~ i "'
SrID NO.
1 1
GENERAL NOTES J. AWAOY.AL OF THIS GRADING PU..H DOE'S NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF \IEIITICAI. OR HCJIIIZONTAL ALIGNIIENT OF ANY PRIVATE ROAD S!lllltll /£REIN FOR PUBI.IC ROAD PlHIPOSES. 2. FJNAL APPROVAL OF TIESE GRADING PLAHS IS SUBJECT TD FINAL APPROVAL OF TIE ASSOCIAJED IUPRtlV£JENT Pt.I.NS ltlERli: APPUCA!ll.E. FlNAL CURS 6RADE ELEYAnCNIS HAY RElliilRE CHANril:S IN 11ES£ PU.HS.

3. tHPORT J.IATEFIIALS SHALL SE LEGALLY OBTAitEO.
,t. A SEPARATE PElll/IT FROII TIE CITY ENGIHEER WILL 8E REQUIRED FOR ANY IIORIC IN THE PUBLIC Rl6HT-GF-IIAY. 5, ALL SLOPES OVl:II THRE'E (3} FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL SE LAl«lSCAPED AND IRIIIGATEO. • S. T1E COl/11!.4CTOR SHAU YrnIFY THE EXIsrrNCE AMJ LOCATION OF ALL IITII.ITIES BEFORE C~IN!i IIOFIX. NOTICE OF PROPOSED lttlllK SHALL BE 6IVEN TO THE FIILLDIIING ASEHClES:

IJNDE/lSROUNO S. ,C 8 H
7, TIE SOILS RtiPOl!TS SHI.LL BE PROVI{)f[) AS ~IRED BY THE CITY OF SOI.ANA BEACH PRIIIII TO ISSUANCE OF A GIIADING PERHIT

8. APPROVAL OF THfS.: Pl.ANS 8Y THE CITY c'1SIN<'..Ell DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY 110/IC DR GRAOI/16 TO BE PERFOIIHED UNTIL THE PflDPERTY OIINER'6 P/ERlfISSIOII HAS 8Effl OBTAINED AND A VAtlD GRADI/19 PERIIIT HAS llEEN ISSI.IB)

9. THE CI THE

10. EG'ur
GRADI
AND 6;
OF!

SATUROA
OF Tl£ CITY
H,ALL MAJOR SLOPES SHALL BE ROUNDED INTO EXISTING TERRAIN TO PilOIJIJCE A CD/ITCUIEO TR.l!ISITION FRD/4 CUT DR Flil SUIFACES TO NATlliAL oRDUNO AND ABIJTTINS CVT OR FILL SIR'ACES. < DA#AGf'

13.SLOPE W. TIQS: CUT 2: 1 FILL a: 1
~ ~~ ~J~k,7Sv;YJ~~Agf1DN
t
i (NDIE: A SEPARATE VALID PERNIT NUST fXIST FOR DFFSITE IHPORT DR • EXPORT AREAS.} t
J •• THE GLIANTlTIES ESTIMATED ABOYE AR£ FOR PERHIT PLflPOSES ONLY AIIIJ SHOILD NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION ams. CONTllAC:TOM ARE c RESPDHSIBLE FOR THEIR r»tN EAR1HIIOOK OOAIITITIES. u. N9
D
Dl
T
PIJ./1

PARTIAL DH DF THIS

PLAN AIIIJ
JS. THE CDNTRACTOR SHAU. NOTIFY TIE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH 85B. 720.2470 24 IIO(l?S llcFI/RE GIIADI/16 OPERATIONS BEi/Iii. j7. M«J PLANTING SH.A.LL BE ACCOltfPLISIECJ ON .A.LL. SL0?ES 1, OR IIIIEDIATELY 1./PON CfllfP!.EiTIDN CiF ANY stOPcS OCTOBER 1 ANO APRIL 1. PRIIIII TO ANY Pl.Al/TING, ALL L BE APPROVED BY THE Pt.ANNING DEPARTHENT AT THE: !Ell STA.E. DR BY SEPARA 1E LJJIDCSAPf PLAN. 18,AU !JFF-SITE HAUL RO!lreS SH/ILL 8E SlSllTTED BY THE COtml,lCTDR TO THE CITY EN6IIEER FOR APPROVAL 72 HOURS PRIOR TO mE BEGI/'11/ING OF IIOl1K.

20. TIE CONTRACTIIR SHALL OESIGN. CONSTRUCT, AMI HAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES INCL UfJlNG SHORING, AND SlfALL BE RESPONSIBLE FDR CTJIIFDm/11/G ro ALL LOCAL. STATE. AND FEDERAL SAFETY ANO HEALTH STANDARDS. LA/ts ANO llffil.l.A TI!INS.

EROSION CONTROL NOTES
J.

2. 3. EROSION CONTROL ON SLOPES SH,U.L BE HITIGATED BY INSTAl.l.ING LANDSCAPIIIG AS PER APRlOVEll t.All!JliCAP= Pl.ANS AS REGUIIIED Bf TIE DtcVELDPIENT REVIEII COIIIJITIONS, 0A BY TEHPOIIARY EROSION CONTROL CONFORNING TO THE FOLLO>t'ING:
_ L.llS/ACRE i!O __ _
50 a
11 7
91 1/0N-IRRIBATEO HYOROSEED HIX 111TH A FIBER NAmrx APPLIED AT'· 000.b§L!~ S: PI/JIITY/ACRE SEED SPECIES 7011 PLUS ATRIPL ___ _

SCARIFIED
50S PLUS
PUNTA
El/CELIS
LOTUS

EXCHSCH

4. THE TOPS OF ALL SLOPES TALLE11 THAN 5' SHALL BE Dil<ED OR TRE.NCf-ED TO PREVEIIT IIA TER FLOlllNG OVER C/lESTS OF SI.OPl:S,
~. CATCH BASINS, DcSILTIIIG BASINS, A/ID STOFl!I DRAIN SYSTEHS SHALL BE INSTALL£!] TO THE SAT!SFACT!ON OF THE CITY ENGINEER. t;, SAND BAS CHECK OAHS, SILT FENCES; FIBER ROLLS OR OTHER APPOOIIEiD SMP 'S SHALL BE PLACEV IH UNPAVEIJ AREAS IIITH GRADif'IITS IN EXCESS OF 2.t. AS I/EU. AS AT OR /!EAR EVERY POINT HHEllE COHCE!ITRATEIJ FLO~ LEAVE THE SITE,

7. SAND BAGS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREA/tl SIDE OF ALL DRAINAGE: IM.ETS TO UINIHIZE SILT BUILDUP Ill TIE INLETS AND PlPE:S.

B. TIIE COi/TRACTOR SHALL rl!EPAill ANY ER0Dm SL!!PES AS DIRECTED Bf TIE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGIIEER.

S. THE CCINTW.CTDR SHALL SNfflJ ROADIIAYS AND ENffiANCES TO ANO FRON THE SI1E ON A REGULAR BASIS TO KEEP rHEI/ FR££ OF SOIL ACC!MULATIDII ANIJ AT ALL OTHER TINES DI&:CTE:D BY TIE CITY EIIGDEER.

10. TtE CONTRACTIJR SffJ,LL I/ATER SITE: DI/ A COIITIMJOI/S BASIS TO HINIHIZE AIR BORNE DUST CREATED FRO,~ GRADING AND HAULING OPERATIONS OR E:XCESSIVE III/ID CCl/11JITIOIIS, AND AT ALL T!Hl:S DlRECTEO BY Tl£ CITY o/lGIIIEER.

11. Ill THE EVENT SILT DOES r;JITER THE EXISTING PIIBLTC STORN DRAIN SYSTEH. RENCVAL OF THE !IIH FROII THE THE SYS19f lllLL BE DONE AT TIE IJEVELOPfR'S EXPENSE.

GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20 30
_ TRG
Drawn&(
EARTHWORK QUANTITIES:
11: Em!YA11111 Fl1l Fl11rI1m U er,
X: FEKNIJ./ffilDPJCTID/ Fill 9JB!1: 230 er;,
~ GIWJIH., A.'arrAlHl IIITH ~ 2W r:r a.Jr & 70 CY F1l.L 1: roTAt. 6lWllNS: 1111 CY
·-fH.Y NV 11£!'£ VAU.ES JCTU.<LQJ.WTIT
JJD/00 5IIEll FACrrRS.

Tfll FCJi ff1flIT RIR>5ES CIH /ll.JClil ¥lllfES CN.r. Cl/ A 1l£IHT1I:AL !l4.!lIS. /XE TO CBSEJ1\£D 9l'lill(,IO! " alT WMmTY aD IDT 1Hllfil EXO. VATml FIil roa.,t,PA.

IMPERVIOUS AREA TABUIATION TDTAL EX.lS11Ni DRllVltUi AF£A U/-5I/E; 2.fl8 liF TOTAL /HRl5!il1 DA!IIVlllB N£A t1HiIIE -(734 !F /ET 00£4S£ I/1 llftR'r'lWi N£A; W!5 liF
REFERENCE MAPS WP 2B2B - IWN1BI IEI/!HT5 !u;ll54!i
--
A.'DIMATIDE -T C!10'ETE ,IA'Rl(l)MTF N:
-
Bllll'li AT FIHI916FWE a.
(1,(
£!i
a.

EX
FS
FIi
Fl'5ll
Fl.

If'
IE
IF
NIK
HIN
OC8I
R.

FfU'
PUl
Pfl
R1N
RY!B
SJ
StR.!
S"
ss
SISll
n:
lflJil1UI
rll IDl7BI E.4DI ltAY FflPEf/1Y UJE
-
PlBJC
Rl!VAIE
RJJi B.EVATllJI cc7lMl1<
STMIWDIJ,001,II
LEGAL DESCRJPTION LOT B 1N a.Dal K CF H4'1VlBI t£lll1TS INI1 IO. ,( 1N 1IE IDlfTY IF SN/ O.!l$11 sr;,n; (F CALlFll'MA. M:tUlJNJ TO HIP 1lB£{F /0. am FII.Jil) IN 71£ Cl'F.IC£ CF 11f w..tlTY /EaHcll IF SN/ D1&/ w..1/TY, CE/Bf£R Zl, S,1, A.P.N.

SITE ADDRESS

OWNER/PERMITTEE

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY

LOT INFORMATION
253-191-00
lli!5Faf/A~
s:LAII< BEADI QI Sll075
ctM/ CN'ITAt. A'IJERTlE!!. LLC m,4 Alfl<ID4 IE. US FECAS LA ..ail Cl !12037 (6J!l/i564-!Bl3
CJR:!B..c.5tlMYI.lll]N;,
JIU S. ESDtCJIIXJ ll.Vll, EllC!NJJTD CA !r'(3
(750)--.zti
·\!)!; ;:'
SEC~O~~,A
I/IS
1F
711
111
r TfP(FFEJa'
7D' CF !RIii; 11P (F ltALL TrP (F liW. AT Fil/lSH £i'lllE m>EAI. 3•~/~7,_r~➔-~~
4" TllitX waErE: PA£-··· ·• ·· · · ·. ' . #I - Ffi1I :: __ .:. .. _.:.: ,;:,. HIN ilUffD llCOC 10·
EE!ITEIJ1 JEIJfEIG4T.ll16 - - l/4. tJI LARBI
tlGN>/JJINT' IE1lEEN PA\l!RS 9MU. IE 3'. A .Dl1" 9l4I.I. IE JNiTAUHJ AT TIE a/lER -CF 71EPAl!,II,

PAVER PATIO DETAIL I/TS
A
Al'Nlllll-1111-llt!
CITY APPROVED CHANGl18 I >WD I 1:1\TE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION ~-----·---~-- ---- By: ____ _ Nlll!O: l(Ill,IAlf J. Sl/IIER__ 1----------------i----+----t -~ R.C E. __ 158964 E,p: 12LJ.J/ej By:~- --- ------- QHAHIWISAIIHAK,CtyB,gJnoer R.C.E......Jl.~ °""'' --- Elq>: _§fJp.m_ ma F£11 IJNJ$N£
l!l' CF /llll fl.EVAT.lil\51 ASliHJHNCIIFt.NiS
1·3...•
WORK TO BE DONE THE IIIPROVEKENTS CONSIST fJF THE FDLi.GliIN6 I/ORK TD BE 00/E ACCORDING TO THESE PLANS AMI THE LA TEST EDITIONS OF:

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
(1/ SP6 IONS FOR PUBUC t«lf!KS CONSTRUCTION T AHENOHEHTS. (2) H ION "HA/IIML OF TRAFFIC HA /ICE lrORK ZOIIES• (3) T liSPORTATIDN STAIIIA.'10 9'
1 LEGEND
I11ill t:ESCRIPTifll
/ilBJMSml llVlJNf(
.AD.JN:ENT _,-y L1IE
Fmro'lED !xTBNJ<S
CENISI.N: rF Rl/lfT-IF-HAY
EXISTNJEJSEJ£Nr
&ISr1/l,!J'OTSUVAT.ll11
EXIlilllfi Cil/TCUI
easT1Nl IIATBl HUN
EXIST1NJ lBEll MAJN
EXISTI16 9>:JT El.EYATJm
l'lDQEI ff/OT B.EVATirll
flUIOSEDl%MTUI
- llUll.llJMil FOOlR'l11/T 3" PVC o.<JNA!c P!re
4' PIC Cll41N.46c PZFF
IR4.l™G£ DIFEI:TIJR
-.;-:av. o
---.100----
---W---
---s---
(FS JOO(XX)
FS >:xx.XX
---ioo---

MOUNTABLE CURB DETAIL
CRA1JW£ SI&£ (IS HIN/
lfJ.N[.18£ QR)
I/TS
UTILITY NOTE:

PCC PAVI/E
!tR\'llUI PAVER ml OTlBlS
~ BASJN
5ITE ltALL PER 01IERS
ARTIFICIAL. Tiff ffJ1 OllfllS
00 PAVJN;
S4IICIJT
f£/'AJ/11Nj li4LJ. ffJl 01l£RS
llHUIID'-fW'
. l
I -I
'-. = 11£ - ro = 1N TIE KEA. 7)£ a1i1RACTCfl JS EEW11ED ro TN:E <Ali '--,"-._~ IE)SR1S l1l PrmB:I' ANY fXISIJH'; LIT.IUT.!ES Ol S1IIUOTflES UlllmJ AT Tl£ . La:A
l'l'™L.$£
-
ID ~ EVI11i/a a' EEi& Ul!IML l.DC4T1t11 RX.NI. CDITRICT(1I Tll _,- UJCATilli NfJ l1NIITI/lf IF P11'E NlJ QlH11H\1E llflH CIV1l. EHWB!1I NO CITY ENJIIEER IF FEPUDiJefr IS ~-

OWNER'S CERTIACATE
~ESCRIB£D Hi'REIN ACKNOi/lEDG/t TH~~~~~~llF'~~~~~r DIRECTION kITH HY Fl.ti COIISEIIT. I FULLY IJ/llRSTAW Al«J ACCEPT THE TERl<S AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN AIIIJ AS ATTACIED BY REFE:Re1CE ON THIS GRADI/19 PLAN.

IT IS AGREEll TlfAT FIELD CONDITIONS #A Y REIIUIRE CHMIEIES TO Tl/ESE PU.NS.

GREED THAT THE O>llEF! /DEVELOPER) SWJ.L HAVE A REGISTEREO Txh-~I~ER~~w:fi~Sri'CE~.w~
COl4PLETION OF THE I/tlfPROVE1'EHTS, ~I~
Z FURTHER AGREE TO COHH/iNCE ~
THESE PLANS HITHIN EXISTING CaNSTRUCTICl/1 PERI/IT AND T/J NORHAL lfDRJCZNG DAY IINTIL C OF ANY OT/Ell HOAK ASSOCIATE WT!: \ TROY FOSS FOR COVE CAPITAL P~RTIES, LLC DATE
t3 ' ~;~1Jo~s PESCAS
';:Q ',
"'~' 0 \ PECLARATION OF RES~J!~'iicf!~~ I AH THE E:1/GIIEER OF i ~{T\ ', 'f!!tc:!:Jn: ~JsPf'Ilo'tJ~k'f!~~RC,Jlff/l,ffi/f;':!/f:-ETHE~N~r,;R , AND PRDFESSICll/S CODE, AHO THE DESIGN JS CDIISISlB/1 WITH CURR/:1/T STANDM!llS ANO THE crTY OF' SOLANA BEACH RESDLUTZOII No. 2016-043.

I IJHDERSTA/ifJ THAT THE CHECK OF PROJECT lJRAHrNSS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY THE CITY OF" SOLANA BEACH IS COflFIIIED TD A REVIEH CH. Y AICI DOES I/OT ,£. /lfLIE'VE HE: OF RESPONSIBILITIES FOR POOJECT OE:S \
"
i~
:,:
\
BY: _____________ _
WILLZAH J. SUITER RCE Ho, 68964 EXP fZ/Jf/202f PASCO LARET SU TIER & ASSOCIATES

PASCO LAREY SUITER
& ASSOCIATES I.ML ENGINE.RING+ WiQ PIAliNIN8 + LANO SURYl:YINli 53S North Highway lOl, Ste A, Sola:nt Bcub, CA 92075
ph 85S.l59.B:ll2 j f.-.:858,259.4612 f pluengiru,erl.n1,com COASTAi. COMMISS/0/I PERMIT NO.

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH OAAW!NGNO.
525 FORD AVENUE SHEET1 Ol=I
-u:,'
~-
ml
1 1 -N
I m
r;,,,:i!
'
~ l .[ j ii>
t== 1"1'•(./ ll"i'·C.' -ti 1
r 2
t f1"110H vf)(r:J= i::,\.J:. ATic;iJ po\..E: 1-l-T,
-iuT c-::--::'Z"1[; 'J-Z:- .. ... 30!:7, r:70 .. ~- , .... 10:0~ :...1. :.:..:5 '""'· c.o · ·-'!J~ir., oo_-: r-:·:· 1,z, Ip=- ~ ~ -- '1.';lt,,00 ;cn,.oo _1'3,0C .,
C..4 "Z"'Jv;"f:x; . -::Ob,00 ·-· IZ.oo
t:i!~ . . ,:!11)(;?,,Z,d. . ---~ -• . "X)f!,,c;;_q - _-:_rJ;_-;.c, - ~ - "2__d")r,;;0:7 ~051,, Ct'? -i'?",00 -
c;, --,z.,,.,,.,C' '310.0Q. ,.:...--1.f, Jc'?
. ut) - ,Z1~,r;,C, '31"2..00 ! c,, 'l.'7 -- (;"I ,z~c,. "2C::, '310,00 l"?,f;,O .10 ~".Jf!.?/:? ·--.,.,,,o;oo··~ ···:~J:i,7C
11 '.ZO)(o,':X-L - :':Q f.,, ex:, 11-~
:7Z =. '?.il':Tcr- -'3ae;;oo· - iC??)E? -.
:v ,zo;,c,, -;:::;, '30:;?,C::7 .. _1i:.1 4·
14- 1.,0:,C,. i;; 4- ~Ob,o-:? 11, 4-v
1'7 ,Z,")C,,,,(? ".>O'b,OO !i,'?O

2. I (./
-
1-----...cr-1------.@----lt-
")1 '2':)'-C, ,,
F- ktJ
----¥--------- ,-----
lF rit-11111-1 6f/\Pr: --~-YA11o--l ro1.t:-::-.m::=. jl F INWl-l 61Wt' &LNA110r4 f'tlt.e I-IT· 1& ___ '2">1,";>"2 . ~o~.,_qQ __ ___ IO,C?!';, __ _ .. "2¾:"ot?~~ ::__-::~l1ccO __ 1 ____ 'tTq.::>--=
.:t7 .. 'l~v.,o '¾'?,<X' ·· ::_ J-:?;70·· ·- ? I -z.2.~.:-t.'2.. -· 'B>l1.~0 _ - · ~P:t1'C:- 11:"J .• -:-'Zo/r. ")O -:;_,-:,ti,oo_ _ 11.:1rc_ '2.t.ic, ,1c, _--~..:::::::_:::,O;SIC} __ 10) ,zo;,~, O .. "-;)l:?~,_i;v.__ 11, v.9 -
\'.O ~--~a,I '4.
e>I ,Z"),, C:,'2. 1"),00
81A ,Z~,:;. ?:O
/!(Z.. ·_.2,«:,t;-,'c()'" ·--;11:-00-·· -·p,;(,-,\.'7 .. 8":> .. ,-'1-~v,o:>_ · ~11,c,o_ - .2./.Ci'O
li4- :.: .. -,z~1,1._'!l_c:,·_ ----~,rr.oo-:= .. :.:=~1:1c,_-:-_·.:.. ! En __ 'Z.O'J&."LQ._ ·:3'JJ,.QO___ _ ___ ·:".2.t?.SO
11'- Fir-JIW c,RAO.::- J:-'..E;-Vt,r,ON : ftit.S. 1-tT
10: ==:'.J!):1.,-:::,.,-,,.-,--,;,;-,,o.c::_• - u .o&
lo' .. :::::?2-TT;;;rz::.. = "?>\ "), C.o :::-- -Z. 1.14, '1t!i ..:::...::..-'2'>-:1; ,:,:z:- ::, I <;:,, G,o - '2. I , 7"c;. - IC>': .... ,z-,1,"5'2. . -~1'5. C:O -,z1, O"e-, -
HO =".Z':/1,'J.'.1-_ -- ?lf.), QC) •.. 1'I, Ob.

II I ::: i~--r. "2. :: '::i: 1:,: co_ ··::: -zo. C?EJ
llli · :Z:,1;,;,,z-· "?; '7,.c~ .:-zo.. :?r;, -
II"; '20)-r.O;t -~1-r,: !'5 · --·-zo.-z.,
114 '2":li,"?'Z -~31&,\17' ... Z(.?.t.=,:, . -
i
UJ
.!
tt'J
·a
o·
th.
-~-
oa
L..
a.,
;o~
C:
.[
(/);
<
-~
:g
~
~m
~-1
0) I I
<C df:
o~·
ii·
..I u.. o-
-,
<C
..I
0 w
. I-
(/)
ci
~-
(/)
w
z
a:~'
►-~
8! I 'i a: 0)
g ~-
g.; -
,- -
or-
QS)
NORTH
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'
~L■ 0 16 24
FEET

PLANT LEG END MATURE

SYMBOL DESCR IPTION HEIGHT
@) CHONOAOPETALUM TECTORUM • CAPE RUSH 3'
$ DIANELLA TA$. VARIEGATA 3'
@ GREWIA CAFFRA • LAVENDER STAR FLOWER 6'

ESPALIER ON FENCE
(0 LANTANA CONFETTI - LANTANA 2'
l'.i) LAVANOULA 'GROSSO' - LAVENDER 3'
© LIMONIUM PEREZII • STATICE 2'
® PITTOSPOAUM 'MARJORIE CHANNON' • KOHUHU 8'-12'
0 ROSA 'ICEBERG' · ICEBERG ROSES 4'
@ AHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'MINOA' · DWARF YEDDO 5'
SALVIA 'SANTA BARBARA'· MEX. BUSH SAGE 4'
u TIBOUCHINA UAVILLEANA - PRINCESS FLOWER 0@ 10'
@ TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES - STAR JASMINE 18 INCHES
WESIBINGIA FRUTlCOSUM- COAST ROSEMARY 6'
OLEA 'SKY LARK' - DWARF FRUITLESS OLIVE 10'
BIORETENTION AREA: 12"

CAR EX TUMIUCOLA - BEAKELY SEOOE

MULCHED SHRUB AREA
BARK O R ROCK MULCH - 3• DEPTH
NOTE: PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL NOT EXCEED 12' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE.

LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING
<[ SPOTLIGHT UPLIGHTING TREE
FX LUMINAIRE VS UPLIGHT • 6 LEDS (WITH GROUND SPIKE) 10 WATT - NATURAL BAASS,COPPER FINISH ◊ ~'::A~t~~L~itie~1NJ;~~TLEtix LUMINAIRE HG
6' HIGH ----"IIIA''-..1

PERIMETER FENCE
TREE REMOVAL NOTE:

ALL EXISTING TREES ON THE SITE

ARE TO BE REMOVED
WATER
USE
LOW
MOD.

MOO.

LOW
LOW
LOW
MOD.

MOD
LOW
LOW
MOD
MOD
LOW
LOW
LOW

LAWN AND GRAVEL
EDGING: 1/◄" STEEL OURAEDGE BY JD
RUSSELL CO.

BLACK PAINT
FINISH
MIN,

SIZE QUANTITY
SGAL. 15
5 GAL. 23
5 GAL. 14
1 GAL. 23
1 GAL.
1 GAL 37
5 GAL 23
SGAL 11
SGAL. 17
S GAL.
15GAL
1 GAL. 32
5 GAL.
24" BOX
1 GAL. 1-4"0.C,
25'-<1'
REAR -YARD SETI!ACK
RAY CO ETE WlTH
r EDIUM TOPCAST FINIS

I FIRE LACE

SWIMMING POOL

ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) WORKSHEET
Tlu: 1m.:ije-ct'~ fa1im1tH .. "t.l To1al Wat\:r U~ i) cah:ul.111 .. -d using th,: followin~ formuhi .

EllVU ~ (E/'oX0.62{ PF x HA + SLA) IE
E:TWtJ = Estimated lotal water use per )CO! (gallons 1x:r year) ETo = fa'l.lpotn.nspir.'llion ratt Cinches per yc:ir)
PF "'Plant factor from WUCOLS (~ce Dcfinitkiru)
HA = H}dro-::r.ooc .'\re.a (,cquarc foci): Ddinc h~dm-lJlflCS t>} w:itcr u.,;c: \'c l') low. low. moder.tic and hip;h SL.A "'Speci..J L:111dsape Are.i (square fttt)· Edible pl:ints, irrip:cd with recycled w;i.t~r. & turf usrd for ;x.theplay

0.62 ~ Con, crsion F:ictor {lo gallon~ per sqwrr foot)
IE = lrri.:atiun Efficicnc

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWUJ WORKSHEET Line Hydro-zone Number (1 • ◄ Below - use as many tables as neeessarv to oomolete all h11drozonesl
I 3 ,_I Evapotranspirabon Rat~ {ETo)
See "A' b@low Use i (west of 1-5(, 7 (east of 1-5>)
Convers10n Factor - .52 0 62
{Lme 1 x Line 2) 3 I 25.42 (west of 1-51 129.14 (east or 1-5) :

Plant Factor (PF)
See ·e· below
Hydrozone Area (HA) - m square feet
(Line ◄ x Line 5)
lrrig:allOn Efficiency (IE)
See ·c· below
(Line 6 - Line 7)
TOTAL of all Line 8 boxes + SLA
Line 3 x L•ne 9
6 I 0.6
1,242
I 745

0.81 920
' 2,743 '

0.3 0.3
1,078 1,670
323 501

0.81 1.00
399 501
Esbmated Total Water Use · ETWU
(ga llons per year) 10 79,931 gallons per year
Total shall not exceed MAWA be ow
A r;r ... ,:~.,..-
.. 1 ('-·t'S1of 1-5)
-17(C3SI0f 1-5)
B I C rF -ri.,.,rac1,zr-u"'w1·cm.s .,...,, 1o 1r. - 1m,:111io11 r,lfirit11cy ,kf;,..;,_.11w~~'7fi"'.-A ,~, • .-J. ¥n"•.SS Thli ip!, ,r-u,.i,f'Fllf111tk•Hi•·lll11 1/,.,,.,.,. ;,, \/f111Hit'll•.'i'S
II I r I I.II' . ~•, n U>I< Lfo:.-r l•r ;•1;.,.,, U.-,p J A11,•r,;,y,m1 ,. Ji/ 11J=LW 1.,,..,11·u,1'1'Uu fifti:1,

0.6 410
246

0.75 328

1.0 595
595

1.00 595
,..,.,.,~.,..,,,.Fi,•li-in<1liJ',.,=..,.,. I R.,1,N,..,,.,;s /l/1 ~ \l\l' . -.lvflrruk' l\#!rrL'ul'l,1,.1, 1,U,fl=,., l £""1\ ,-,,,,,.N f{W(lf'~,..,h ,J.xHitm1to1/iooJ,J1/>Jr 1 1/1-11\L' II, ,'i l\\11,·rUv f'l,u,i, 1,,,,,,.,,.,,.,,r,,, 1lor-C<11"PHl,i,,.-r MAXIMUM APPLIBD WATER APPLICA TI01' (MA WA'")_c_al_cu_l_at_io_n_: ---~ ~l(ETAr-x 4,995 25.42or29.I-I Tot:.l l...:rndsa1peArc<i l + (l·ETAI' x_0 ___ ll =
Tut:.iJ SL.A
MAWA
80,055 gallons
E\apo1r.inspira1ion adjuslm~nt factor(ETAFJ us G.~i~iJ.4~ non- residential

PROPOSED SINGLE

FAMILY RESIDENCE

HYDROZONES
SYMBOL ZONE VEG. TYPE WATER

USE PLANT FACTOR
r,-,---,-,-,fl 1 1 TREES/SHRUBS MOD
~ #2 TREES/SHRUBS LOW
113 ARTIF. TURF LOW
~ #4 LAWN MOD
#5 POOL WATER FEATURE
TOTAL:

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATION
I am familiar with the requirements for landscape and irrigation plans contained in the City's Water Efficient Landscape Regulations. l have prepared this plan in compliance with those regulations and the Landscape Design Manual. I certify that the plan implements those regulations to provide efficient use of water.

C~, MRr:w" R MERCER RLA #4055
3/9122
DATE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF \'VORK

0.6 0.3

0.3 0.6

1.0 LANDSCAPE PL.AN FOR: GM
Drawn By
APN: 263-191-09-00
AREA
SQ. FT. IRR IGATION TYPE
1,242 DRIP
1,078 DRIP
1,670 NONE
410 MP ROTATOR
595 FILLER PIPE
4,995
IRRIGN. EFFIC.

0.81 0.81

1.00 0.75

1.00 30• HIGH STONE VENEERED
WALL WlTH 30" HIGH WHITE FENCE ABOVE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITl,ClURE 990 SEACOAST DRIVE, STE. 20
IMPERIAL BEACH. CA 91932 (619) 882-2499
COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO. X-XX-XXXX·X GMA I 20-068

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

FOSS RESIDENCE
525 FORD AVENUE
DRAWING NO.

SBGR-XXXL
SHEET 1 OF 1

APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSMENT RECEIVED
(Structure Development Permit)
JUL O 8 2021
Project No.: DR..fJ...o-oo<c/Svf-0 lO
Community Development Dept.

1. Address of property for which the structure development permit has been r~4\¥~{e?P.1ana Beach ~5 -fc>t!,..D ./rllerJvt:, .s; e::>~r-r-.A. ~ ~ Cri- ·
''7J9?}f:

2. ~=:e th~;~~ filing this Application for Assessment: :::~urn{,?;~; !-i~~,-,A ~~IQ! 'J~°q Email: V\/_L-i-f::~---~.J 9'0.~ Jef..tl.--/L. C,,,....,

3. Description of the viewing area as definep in Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance, Section

17.63.020(l)andextentofimpainnent:
fv\k$k_ C b.c Cef-0:l)IV'.l ,k__
V~~
_<;_(_L+~_y ~
ft~o2L~~,..,. ',,~~ ~d- iitk ~ -£=- \l-5~ ft ?hi2:i:&-=54s- ~ ~ · , ~c!. ltvt

4. Identify the portion of the proposed structure which is the most objectionable and suggestions to · minimize the view impairmept: U . ~ . ie e :if; &./4., .. d e.M'.\A--'lt L_o1

5. Description of the Claimants attempt(s) to resolve this issue with the owner/representative of the property for which a Structure Development Permit has been requested: #: ci . ~ .. 4z U.. ~fli7l---e f., ,,vl /ft L -' Date Submitted
STAFF USE ONLY:

Application for Assessment fee paid?
6-2019
City of Solana Beach
Attn: Katie Benson, Project Planner
635 South Highway 101
Solana Beach, CA 92075
June 21, 2021
RE: DRP20-006/SDP-010 {525 Ford Avenue)
Dear Katie,

RECEIVED
JUN 2 3 2021
Community Development Dept.

City of Solana Beach
We would like to apply for a view assessment by the VAC due to significant impact the subject project will have on the primary ocean view out of our Master Bedroom. The bulk and mass of the project will also reduce the light corridors we currently enjoy from the Master Bedroom.

The applicant initially contacted us in early 2020 and we asked to see elevations and plans prior to making any formal recommendations. We received the requested information in April 2021 and made recommendations that mitigated our incremental and cumulative view impairment, but the Applicant disagreed with our approach.

We have included a check for $600 to cover the expense of our application. Please let us know if you need anything else.

Warm Regards,
~ Walt & Kris Edwards
Owners - 535 Ford Avenue, Solana Beach, CA 92075 / {858) 945-3077 Walt Edwards <[email protected]>
To: Larry Jackel <[email protected]>
FYI
(Quoted text hidden]
On Apr 19, 2021, at 3:13 PM, Walt Edwards <[email protected]> wrote:

Troy - I appreciate your help here and thanks for sending your plans and elevations.

Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:17 PM
After reviewing the elevations along with the story poles, it looks like your current plans are situated in a manner that severely impacts our primary view and creates privacy issues.

As I mentioned in our previous dialogue, over the past 10 years we have had our view diminished by new construction, and all that remains is the view that would be significantly impaired by your current plans.

In an effort to preserve what is remaining of our primary view and still allow you to build a house that will be attractive enough to sell to a new homebuyer, we thought the following would be instructive:

Recommendations: (. ~ '( ~ b-w-Afl--1> sJ
- Use a 8-9' ceiling for the 1st floor that extends into the backyard (I couldn't tell if it's planned for 10'?) - In the same section referenced above, use a flat roof versus the 3-4' pitched roof you proposed. - Remove the chimney at the edge of the backyard. I believe there are electric options that would eliminate the need for a big fire burning chimney.
- Move the 2nd story edge closer to story pole #40 instead of the current edge which is - pole #35 (we'll still lose some o our ocean view in this scenario given we understand the need to compromise) - Move the entire house 6 to 8 feet further West, and away from our house. This would help to give the feeling that your house is not on top of ours, and also create a depth that preserves the current light and view corridors. - Remove the window that faces directly into our bedroom.

Best,
Walt ~VI fr f LwiJ e CA-VI,.. ,4-Jk ~ .{, e {I/\ A-- l L- t-/1'1-S ~e.,rJ'r, l ~~L-"C) T(L.c?'( we bl a~ h./fve
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 11:15 AM Troy Foss <[email protected]> wrote: J HiWalt, -11-<._ Vl'rc (v le_ ~1 ~ ~ ~A-S ~ Try this. Im not sure why it only sent one last time.

Troy 1,✓, ii,-, -k It& r+- ~ 0' =~~
Gmail Walt Edwards <[email protected]>
525 Ford - Response to Recommendations
2 messages
Troy Foss <[email protected]> Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:02 PM To: Walt Edwards <[email protected]>
Cc: Kris Edwards <[email protected]>, Scott Spencer <[email protected]> Hello Walt and Kris,
Thank you for your time on the phone today. As a follow up to our discussion, I wanted to send this email to summarize and illustrate our conversation.

Based on the recommendations and photos that you sent me on April 19th, I understand that the view from your deck, while in a seated position, is impacted by our current design. Thank you for sending me the photos to show this impact.

As I mentioned on the phone and by our communication over the past year, my goal has always been to design and build this house while trying to not only preserve your view, but to improve and expand your view by removing trees in our backyard and creating new ocean views.

In response to your recommendations, I propose that we make the following changes:
- Shift the two upstairs east-side bedrooms and bathrooms 5ft towards the front of the house. This would also move the upstairs bedroom windows 5ft further south. This is illustrated by the red lines on the attached plans and photos that you provided.
- Reduce the slope of the roof on the entire back section of the house, causing the roof ridgeline (the highest spot) to drop by ~1.5 ft. Also illustrated by the red lines on the attached plans and photos. - Remove the chimney on the back patio and turn that fireplace into a direct vent. - Remove all of the trees in the backyard creating new ocean views.

These changes should preserve your current ocean views and expand them to the Northwest.

In regards to shifting the house 6-8 ft away from our shared property line, this would require almost a complete redesign of the house which I feel it is an unreasonable request. The current design is within the required city setbacks and the second story is even further within the setbacks by a few feet. This same setback is observed by almost every house in the neighborhood, including yours. Additionally, the current house has been in this location since it was built in 1953, with the house shifted to the East side of the lot and an additional parking spot on the West.

I would be happy to make these changes right now if it would satisfy all of your concerns, but I understand you would prefer to present all of your recommendations to the View Committee. If your decision changes, please let me know.

Thank you again for your time.

Best,
Troy
-f-re-e >
f Lf ~o~'-S
J l"c s J ,J "-h LI ' ;.,r)
( MA-1 L I+ 11 o Vt\
--1-v t\· ~·-11 d- ~
I~ --f-v1I _

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
View Assessment Commission Action Minutes
Tuesday, September 21, 2021- 6:00 P.M. Regular Mtg.

Teleconference Location Only-City Hall/Council Chambers 635 South Highway 101, Solana Beach, CA 92075
Minutes contain a summary of the discussions and actions taken by the View Assessment Commission during a meeting are video recorded and archived as a permanent record.

The video recording captures the complete proceedings of the meeting and is available for viewing on the City's website.

1. CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL
Chairperson Coad called the View Assessment Commission Meeting to order at 6:00PM on Tuesday, September 21, 2021 in the Council Chambers at 635 South Highway 101, Solana Beach.

Present: VAC Members:

Staff Members:

Absent:

Pat Coad, Paul Bishop, Matt Cohen, Robert
Moldenhauer, Frank Stribling, and Robert Zajac
Joseph Lim Community Development Director; Katie
Benson, Senior Planner; John Delmer, Junior Planner;
Elizabeth Mitchell, Assistant City Attorney;
Linda Najjar

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Speaker time limit: 3 minutes)
There were no speakers.

3. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Chairperson Coad asked for any discussions or nominations for the Chair and Vice Chair of the View Assessment Commission.

Commissioner Bishop nominated Commissioner Cohen for Chair and Commissioner Moldenhauer for Vice Chair.

Chairperson Coad asked for any discussions on the nominations. The Commissioners discussed the nominations.

Chairperson Coad called for a motion to nominate Commissioner Cohen as Chair of the View Assessment Commission. Motion made by Commissioner Bishop, seconded by Commissioner Coad, passed 6/0/1 (Cohen Abstain).

Chairperson Cohen asked for any discussion on the nomination of Commissioner Bishop as Vice Chair of the View Assessment Commission. No discussion was made, passed 6/0/1 (Bishop Abstain).

4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Chairperson Cohen called for a motion to approve the agenda. Motion made by Commissioner Zajac, seconded by Commissioner Moldenhauer, passed 7/0.

VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 21, 2021
Page No. 2
Chairperson Cohen read the preamble.

5. DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Properties - 525 Ford Avenue, Solana Beach Applicant Information:

Name: Cove Capital Properties c/o Troy Foss
Architect/Representative:

Name: Scott Spencer, Scott Spencer & Associates
Claimant Information:

Name:

Address:

Walt Edwards
535 Ford Avenue
Project Description:

The Applicant is requesting the approval of a Structure Development Permit (SOP) to demolish a single-story single-family residence and construct a replacement two-story single-family residence with an attached two-car garage. The 11,856 square-foot lot is located within the Low Residential (LR) Zone, and the Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ). The following is a breakdown of the proposed floor area:

Proposed First Floor Living Area
Proposed Second Floor Living Area
Proposed Garage
Proposed Exterior Covered Area
Subtotal
Required Parking Exemption
Basement Exemption
Total Floor Area Proposed
Maximum Allowable Floor Area (SROZ)
2,397 SF
1,499 SF
500SF
16 SF
4,412 SF
-400 SF
-1,276 SF
4,012 SF
4,025SF
The maximum building height is proposed at 24.23 feet above the proposed grade with the highest pole at 320.33 feet above mean sea level (MSL). A SOP is required for new construction in excess of 16 feet in height.

Commissioner Cohen opened the public hearing on item #5 of the agenda.

Commissioner Najar recused from the meeting.

VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 21, 2021
Page No. 3
Katie Benson, Senior Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation describing the project. A copy of the PowerPoint will be included in the project file.

Troy Foss, applicant, presented a PowerPoint presentation and described their project and the communications they had with the Claimants. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation will be included in the project file.

Walt and Kristin Edwards, Claimants, presented a PowerPoint presentation and described their concerns of view blockage they would have by the proposed project. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation will be included in the file.

Jim King, member of the public, voiced his concerns with the proposed project.

Mr. Foss and his Architect, Scott Spencer, addressed issues that were brought up by the Claimants.

The Commissioners had questions for the Applicant, Claimant, and City Staff.

Chairperson Cohen closed the public meeting.

The Commissioners started stating their disclosures regarding dates they visited the properties.

Chairperson Cohen called for a motion to reopen the public meeting to continue stating the Commissioner's disclosures. Motion made by Commissioner Zajac, seconded by Commissioner Coad, passed 6/0/1 (Najjar absent).

The Commissioners stated their disclosures (as shown on table below) regarding dates they visited the properties.

Chairperson Cohen closed the public meeting.

The Commissioners gave their findings as shown below:

Cove Capital Properties Coad Bishop Cohen Moldenhauer Najjar Zajac Stribling c/o Tro Foss Claimant 9/15 & 9/18 9/19 9/18 9/18 9/18 Date 9/20
Visited Applicant 9/15 & 9/18 9/19 9/18 9/18 9/18 9/20
Primary Deck Deck Bedroom Balcony Deck Deck Viewing Area (Deck) #1. Communication y y y y y y Taken Place
VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 21, 2021
Page No. 4
#2. No Public View y Impairment
#3. Designed to
Minimize View N
Impairment
#4. No Cumulative N View Impairment
#5. Neighborhood N Compatibility
y y y y

N N N N

N N N N
y N N y
Chairperson Cohen called for a motion to reopen the meeting. Motion made by Commissioner Coad seconded by Commissioner Zajac, passed 6/0/1 (Absent- Najjar). y
N
y
N
Commissioner Cohen asked the applicant and claimant if they would be open to continue the meeting to a later date. The applicant and claimant stated they would be open to a continuance until he next regularly scheduled VAC meeting.

Commissioner Bishop made a motion to close the public meeting, seconded by Commissioner Coad. 6/0/1 (Absent- Najjar)
Chairperson Cohen called for a motion to reopen the public meeting. Commissioner Bishop motioned to reopen the public meeting. Motion seconded by Commissioner Moldenhauer, passed 6/0/1 (Absent - Najjar).

Commissioner Bishop motioned to continue the item until November 16, 2021 VAC meeting.

Motion seconded by Commissioner Stribling, passed 6/0/1 (Absent- Najjar).

6. DRP21-004/SDP21-004 Blakely Residence - 211 Ocean Street, Solana Beach Chairperson Cohen called item #6, asked for recusals and called for a motion o continue the item to the October 19, 2021 VAC Meeting.

Commissioner Stribling recused from the October VAC Meeting.

Commissioner Najjar rejoined the VAC meeting.

Commissioner Zajac made a motion to continue item #6 until the October 19, 2021 VAC Meeting. Motion seconded by Commissioner Najjar, passed 6/0/1 (Absent- Stribling) The item was continued until the October 19, 2021 VAC meeting.

7. VAC MEMBER COMMENTS/ DISCUSSION
There were no comments from commissioners
VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 21, 2021
Page No. 5

8. STAFF COMMENTS / DISCUSSION
Staff confirmed that the next VAC meeting will be on 10/19/21 .

9. ADJOURNMENT
The motion made by Commissioner Zajac to close the meeting, seconded by Commissioner Coad, passed 7/0.

Chairperson Cohen declared the meeting adjourned at 9:08 PM .

Minutes as approved by V.A.C. on ,t \S.?] G Z
Respectfully sub · ted,
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH www.cityofsolanabeach.org
635 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075(858) 720-2400Fax (858) 720-2455

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
View Assessment Commission Notice of Recommendation
Tuesday, February 15, 2022 - 6:00 P.M. Regular Mtg.

PROJECT CASE NO: DRP20-006/SDP20-010 Cove Capital Residence PROJECT LOCATION: 525 Ford Avenue, Solana Beach
APPLICANT NAME: Cove Capital Properties c/o Troy Foss
APPLCIANT CONTACT: Troy Foss
PRESENT VAC MEMBERS: Paul Bishop, Pat Coad, Frank Stribling, Robert Moldenhauer, and Robert Zajac,
STAFF MEMBERS: Joseph Lim, Community Development Director, Katie Benson, Senior Planner, Elizabeth Mitchell, Assistant City Attorney, John Delmer, Junior Planner
ABSENT: Matthew Cohen
RECUSED: Linda Najjar
ASSESSMENT FILED BY:

Name: Walt and Kris Edwards
Address: 535 Ford Avenue, Solana Beach
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The Applicant is requesting the approval of a Structure Development Permit (SDP) to demolish a single-story single-family residence and construct a replacement two-story single-family residence with an attached two-car garage. The 11,856 square-foot lot is located within the Low Residential (LR) Zone, and the Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ). The following is a breakdown of the proposed floor area:

Proposed First Floor Living Area
Proposed Second Floor Living Area
Proposed Garage
Proposed Exterior Covered Area
2,354 SF
1,542 SF
505 SF
16 SF
Subtotal 4,417 SF
Required Parking Exemption - 400 SF
Total Floor Area Proposed 4,017 SF
Maximum Allowable Floor Area (SROZ) 4,025 SF
February 15, 2022

VAC NOR

Page 2 of 3 ends

The maximum building height is proposed at 22.08 feet above the existing grade with the highest pole at 320.00 feet above mean sea level (MSL). A SDP is required for new construction in excess of 16 feet in height.

VAC RECOMMENDATION:

The project was originally heard at the September 21, 2021 meeting which was conducted via teleconference in accordance with Government Code sections 54953(e) and 54954.3 and other applicable law.After the Commissioners presented their findings and they discussed their choices, Chairperson Cohen made a motion to reopen the meeting to ask the Applicant if they would consider a continuance, seconded by Chairperson Zajac, passed 6/0/1 (Absent – Najjar). The Applicant consented to continue the meeting. Commissioner Bishop made a motion to continue the public hearing until November 16, 2021, seconded by Commissioner Stribling, passed 6/0/1 (Absent – Najjar).

The Applicant requested the public hearing to be continued until December 21, 2021. The December 21, 2021 meeting was cancelled due to a lack of quorum. The revised project plans were not submitted to Staff in time to be heard at the January 18, 2022 meeting. The public hearing was continued again to the February 15, 2022 meeting which was conducted via teleconference in accordance with Government Code sections 54953(e) and 54954.3 and other applicable law. During the meeting, Mr. Foss did not consent to a continuance and requested that the VAC make a recommendation instead of continuing the project to a later date.

After additional discussion between the Commissioners, Commissioner Zajac made a motion to recommend denial of the project; seconded by Commissioner Coad. Motion passed 4/1/1/1 Ayes: Bishop, Coad, Moldenhauer, Zajac. Noes: Stribling. Absent: Cohen.

Recused: Najjar.

FINDINGS:

1. The Applicants for the Structure Development Permit have made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the Claimants requesting view assessment. Written evidence of a good faith voluntary effort to meet and discuss view issues, or of a good faith voluntary offer to submit the matter to mediation, is hereby deemed to be a reasonable attempt to resolve view impairment issues.

Yes - Written accounts and oral testimony at the public meeting showed that there had been communication between the Applicants and the Claimant.

2. The proposed structure does not significantly impair any view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bikeways, walkways, equestrian trails), which has been identified in the City’s General Plan or City designated viewing areas.

Yes - The subject property is not located within designated public viewing areas; therefore, the proposed structure does not significantly impair views from public property.

February 15, 2022

VAC NOR

Page 3 of 3 ends

3. The proposed structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

No -The majority of the VAC members found that the proposed residence was not designed or situated to minimize impairment of views. The VAC members found that more could be done to minimize the impairment of views from the Edwards Residence.

4. There is no significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application.

Cumulative view impairment shall be determined by: (a) Considering the amount of view impairment caused by the proposed structure; and (b) considering the amount of view impairment that would be caused by the construction on other parcels of structures similar to the proposed structure.

No - The majority of the VAC members found that there would be significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application if adjacent lots were allowed to construct a development of a similar size and height.

5. The proposed structure is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

Yes -The majority of the VAC members found that the proposed development is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character. The development would be compatible with the existing neighboring structures in terms of design, bulk, scale, height and size.

VAC Vote:

Commissioner Zajac made a motion to recommend denial of the project; seconded by Commissioner Coad. Motiorr passed 4/1 /1/1 Ayes: Bishop, Coad, Moldenhauer, Zajac. Noes:

Stribling. Absent: Cohen. Recused: Najjar.

AC Recommendation: February 15, 2022
ews, Princip Planner
iaison, View Assessment Committee
Paul Bishop, Vice-Chair
View Assessment Committee
1140 South Coast
Highway 101
Encinitas, CA 92024
Tel 760-942-8505
Fax 760-942-8515
www.CoastLawGroup.com
March 24, 2022
Via Electronic Mail
[email protected]
Ms. Katie Benson
Senior Planner
City of Solana Beach
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Re: Applicant Comment in Support of Request for SDP
Reconsideration of VAC Recommendation of Denial
525 Ford Avenue, Solana Beach
Dear Ms. Benson:

Coast Law Group LLP represents the interests of Applicant Cove Capital Properties, LLC and Troy Foss (the “Applicant”) regarding the proposed single family residence redevelopment at 525 Ford Avenue in Solana Beach.

On February 15, 2022, the City of Solana Beach View Assessment Commission (“VAC”) was able to make three of the five findings for issuance of a structure development permit required by Solana Beach Municipal Code §17.63.040(F). This letter addresses Findings (F)(3) & (4), the two findings the VAC purportedly could not make and that resulted in its recommendation of SDP denial. We believe the VAC erred and that the Council can in fact make these findings.

Of particular concern to the Applicant regarding the outcome of the VAC hearing was the Commission’s apparent unwillingness to appreciate the overwhelmingly improved view afforded the neighbors as a result of the Applicant’s removal of a longstanding tree that historically blocked a large area blue water on the horizon to the southwest. This effort created a wholly new area of blue water view (arguably better in and of itself than the views historically realized by the neighbors). Though the Applicant offered a covenant to ensure a height limit on potential future vegetation that would block this new view, this was apparently not taken into consideration when the VAC finalized its recommendation of denial. Following the VAC hearing, the Applicant reiterated to the neighbors its willingness to permanently protect this new view, but the neighbors remain unsatisfied. (See Exhibits A and E).

Finding #3: The proposed project is designed and situated to minimize impairment of views.

Finding (F)(3) requires that the Applicant design and situate the structure “in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.” As reflected in Exhibit B, the Applicant’s original proposed building envelope would have significantly impaired the neighbor’s dominant blue water southerly views. However, after multiple discussions with the affected neighbors and staff, the Applicant made a number of meaningful revisions to address concerns. First, the second story of the structure was shifted street-ward such that it eliminated completely any blockage of the COAST LAW GROUP11 r
525 Ford Ave. – Applicant Comment in Support of SDP
March 24, 2022

Page 2 of 4 ends

neighbor’s primary southerly blue water view. In addition, the Applicant lowered the first-floor roof pitch and removed a chimney, thereby eliminating all proposed obstruction of the blue water horizon line. To address neighbors’ privacy concerns, the Applicant moved a nearby second story window 5’ further away from the neighbors’ deck and bedroom doors. (See Exhibit B).

When Neighbors continued to express dissatisfaction with the bulk and mass of the second story as perceived from their bedroom doors and balcony, the Applicant again undertook meaningful revisions, removing 91 sq. ft. of the second floor next to their balcony, minimizing the roof bulk by changing its design to hips instead of gables, eliminating two additional windows, and 112 sq. ft. of master deck. This reduced the second-floor mass by more than 12% and reflected a good faith attempt to further reduce claims of light plane impact. (See Exhibits B, C, and D).

With the changes made to the proposed structure, the Applicant at this point had diligently followed both the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code’s development standards as well as many of the recommendations made in the City’s View Assessment Guidelines and Toolkit:
• The proposed development meets the intent of the code and guidelines: The stated intent of the City’s code and guidelines includes balancing the ability to creatively implement solutions while recognizing there is no guaranteed right to an unobstructed view. The applicant took feedback and implemented meaningful and reasonable steps to protect the neighbors’ view.

Another intent of the guidelines is to preserve the existing scale and character of the neighborhood, which the VAC found the Applicant has done. (See View Assessment Commission Notice of Recommendation, Finding #5).
• The proposed development respects the neighbors’ side yard daylight plane. The Applicant made significant amendments to the roofline and eliminated bulk immediately adjacent to the neighbors’ side yard adjacent to their primary viewing area. (See Guidelines recommendation that “Roof shape and configuration should minimize apparent height and view interference” and “second story bulk should be placed to minimize the impact to the existing views.”) These efforts did more than minimize view impairment, they eliminated it altogether.1
1 To the extent the neighbors claim the minor southerly view of blue water over the top of the Applicant’s current structure is deserving of protection, their position is untenable. There is virtually no second story design that could be undertaken that would have allowed this small sliver of view to be retained. Given the significance of their dominant blue water views to the west of that sliver, coupled with the new view created by vegetation removal, the blockage of the small portion of blue water should not be considered significant. (See red arrow in Exhibit D). 525 Ford Ave. – Applicant Comment in Support of SDP
March 24, 2022

Page 3 of 4 ends

• View quality has been taken into account. The guidelines encourage the VAC to consider “totality of the view, considering not only its size and quality, but how it is utilized from within the home and its importance to the resident.” The guidelines are unequivocal that “the horizon line is the most sensitive part of the view” and that applicants should “if possible, avoid cutting the horizon line of a neighbor’s view.” Views to the Pacific Ocean are specifically called out as “important objects” in a property’s view. As clearly evidenced in Exhibit A, the most sensitive part of the neighbors’ view, the horizon and blue water areas, has been not only protected it has been meaningfully enhanced.

The changes made to the Applicant’s original proposal, particularly including vegetation removal, unquestionably address the quality of views claimed by the neighbors.

Notwithstanding the applicant’s efforts to avoid view blockage, its vegetation removal efforts expressly meet the guidelines suggestion that “in some situations, the loss of a view can be compensated by the opening up on an equal or better view. The removal or trimming of unnecessary vegetation … may provide a cost effective way to accomplish this objective.”
Put simply, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to argue the neighbors are not being given a better view, both in quality and quantity, than they have ever had since purchasing their home.

Finding #4: There is no evidence of significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application.

Solana Beach Municipal Code §17.63.040(F)(4) directs the VAC and Council to consider the possibility of cumulative view impairment based both on the view impairments of the structure currently proposed and the possibility that other parcels would build out in a similar manner.

First, the Council should consider which residences in the vicinity of the Applicant’s have not yet been renovated and are within the pathway of significant private or public views. Notably, the only nearby property that has not been remodeled or developed with a second story element and could implicate the neighbors’ view is the home at 517 Ford Avenue, adjacent to the Applicant’s property, to the south. (See Exhibit F).

Redevelopment of this property is not likely to contribute to a cumulative view impairment for the View Assessment claimants at 535 Ford Ave. As reflected in red on Exhibit F, the 535 Ford Ave. property’s primary view cuts across the back half of 525 Ford Ave. and approximately the back third of 517 Ford Ave. Notably, the view opportunities from a second story at 517 Ford Ave., represented in yellow, would be more westerly, over the top of the lower structures on Marview Dr., and therefore redevelopment of that property with a goal of enhancing its views would not require encroachment of the structure’s footprint meaningfully to the west. 525 Ford Ave. – Applicant Comment in Support of SDP
March 24, 2022

Page 4 of 4 ends

Put another way, if in the future the 517 Ford Ave. property is significantly redeveloped, there is more than sufficient building envelope to accommodate a second story and expanded FAR without expanding much beyond the current structure’s footprint. As noted in Exhibit G, construction of a second story over the existing 517 Ford Ave. structure could be done without negatively impacting 535 Ford Ave.’s expanded views.

Conclusion
In light of the foregoing, coupled with the positive findings of the VAC, the Council can make all of the Municipal Code’s required SDP findings for the proposed redevelopment of 525 Ford Ave.

Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or concerns. We respectfully request that you make this correspondence available to the Mayor and Councilmembers before the matter is brought before them.

Sincerely,
Coast Law Group LLP
Marco A. Gonzalez
cc: Cove Capital Properties, LLC
Joseph Lim ([email protected])
Community Development Director
City of Solana Beach
Exhibit A – The removal of vegetation significantly enhances the southwesterly view across the applicant’s property.

A covenant ensuring protection of this view has been proposed to the view claimant.

The red dashed line marks the approximate location of prior view blockage due to vegetation growth.

Before After
New View
Exhibit B
Original Proposed
Plan would have
blocked the majority
of the neighbor’s
blue water views.
1st Revision - Slide upstairs 5’ South - Lowered roof pitch on 1st floor - Removed Chimney - Moved upstairs side windows 5’ South 2nd Revision - Removed 91 sqft of upstairs NE corner near Edwards deck. - Changed roofs to be hips instead of gable. - Eliminated 2 upstairs windows on East side. - Removed 229 sqft of master deck, 112 sqft from North side. - Removed all trees and bushes from backyard. - Reduced overall upstairs mass by over 12% Changes made throughout VAC
process were meaningful.

Original Plan
Exhibit C
I
~
I ,o:,
""'· """
-~~
Exhibit D
Shows the protected
primary southerly
blue water view with
second story
significantly pulled
back.

Exhibit E
Shows southwesterly view
largely blocked by vegetation
and relatively narrow blue
water view prior to
vegetation removal
Exhibit F – Primary Views for 517 Ford Ave and 535 Ford Ave. 525 Ford Ave 535 Ford Ave
Exhibit G – Possible
Cumulative Impact of
Additional Redevelopment
Possible 517 Ford Ave. Second Story
Solana Beach City Council Meeting
Case # DRP20-006/SDP20-010
RE: 525 Ford Avenue Project
Claimant: Walt & Kristin Edwards
535 Ford Avenue
April 13, 2021
West views from 535 Ford Avenue Deck
Ocean view dependent on 525 Ford
Ave 10 ft Vegetation Easement
Ocean view dependent on 528 Marview Drive AND
525 Ford Ave 10 ft Vegetation Easement
Ocean view lost in 2010
due to 505 Ford Ave
Development is not designed in a manner
compatible with neighboring properties
1) 521 Marview Dr (5,358 sq ft): Bulk & mass below street level 2) 505 Ford Ave (4,550 sq ft): Used basement to mitigate view impact 3) 501 Marview Dr (3,083 sq ft): West of 505 Ford. Unseen because it is only one story 4) 516 Ford Ave (4,383 sq ft): One story above street level. Bulk & mass below street level 5) 476 Marview Dr (3,542 sq ft): Two story home but doesn’t block any views from the East 521 Marview Dr 505 Ford Ave
501 Marview Dr
516 Ford Ave
476 Marview Dr
Subject property has shifted much more bulk and mass onto the 2nd floor relative to neighboring properties where views were impacted Building and Structure Placement
- Building is not sited and designed to minimize adverse impacts on surrounding properties - Siting is placed very close to our property line (~ 7ft vs 18ft on the other side) adversely affecting our view and light corridors
- Size of 3 bedrooms, 3 baths, closets and covered deck adversely affect our views POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS:
1) No change to proposed plans / Provided applicant can get the owner of 528 Marview to agree to a 10ft
Vegetation Easement preserving the recently opened
ocean view corridor (see slide #2)
2) Reduce size of rooms on 2nd story. Move the two beds on the 2nd story onto the same side of the hallway with a jack and jill bath, while flipping the stairs onto the other side of the house (see sketch). With a 10ft Vegetation
Easement over 525 Ford preserving ocean views
3) Move two of the bedrooms and baths to the 1st floor
or use a basement like the homes in the immediate
vicinity. With a 10ft Vegetation Easement over 525 Ford preserving ocean views
4) Move the entire structure ~5 ft further away from our property line so it is equidistant (12.5/12.5) from both neighboring homes vs the current 7ft/18ft asymmetry .

With a 10ft Vegetation Easement over 525 Ford
preserving ocean views
1 Katie Benson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 7:26 AM
To: Katie Benson
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 525 Ford Ave - City Council April 13th
Thank you again Katie for letting us look the new plans over with you, and for your explanations. I am sorry I won’t be able to attend the April 13 hearing.

There are at least 4 points I would like to bring up as they relate to the proposed development at 525 Ford Ave., which is next door to our family home at 517 Ford Ave.

A large portion of the eastern sky would be cut out of our view from our backyard and side yard, based on the current story poles.

The second floor of the proposed development, although approximately 12 to 13 feet from our property line, is an imposing wall. The western bedroom and bathroom windows and western terrace look directly down into our father’s bedroom and bathroom windows. This is a serious privacy issue. A “six plus two foot” fence along that property line will not remedy this. Nor would a row of trees tall enough to provide privacy, without making the proposed west side parking driveway unusable. Clerestory windows on the west wall of the second floor could mitigate the privacy issue somewhat however. Substantially reducing the square footage of the second floor is the only way to lessen the impact on 517 Ford. By substantially, we suggest halving the current top floor square footage.

Compatibility with the neighborhood is questionable. A person building the house with the sole purpose of selling it and never living in it would have a different opinion on this than long time Ford Avenue residents. Please take a slow walk from one end of Ford to the other end, and then stand in front of the story poles at 525 and truthfully answer the compatibility question.

Our parents have had to experience approximately two and a half years of almost constant construction traffic, congested parking on the street, large trucks and equipment rolling down Ford Ave many times per day, six days per week. Building these big spec homes takes quite a bite out of the quality of life for residents in the immediate vicinity.

Our father now hopes to live the rest of his life in the home he built 68 years ago at 517 Ford Ave. The street is finally quiet again.

We would like to invite anyone from the Solana Beach planning department or city council to please come onto our property at 517 Ford anytime to see what we are talking about. Call the house or check at the front door, but even if no one is home feel free to walk into the side and back yards through the gate. There are no dogs on the property.

Thank you for taking these comments Katie.

Jim King
858-755-2458 Home
760-937-3588 Cell
1111
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager’s Department/City Attorney’s Office SUBJECT: Introduce (1st Reading) Ordinance 522 – Amending Chapter 7.20 and Adding Chapter 7.20.040 to the Solana
Beach Municipal Code to Regulate Non-Serialized
Untraceable Ghost Guns
BACKGROUND:

There is a loophole in California resulting in the sale and use of unregulated, nonserialized and untraceable firearms. These firearms are built from unregulated firearm parts, components and/or gun build kits known to be used to help create do-it-yourself “ghost guns.” The ghost gun loophole allows people to buy and build firearms without passing a background check or complying with other laws that regulate the sale of firearms in California and the United States.

According to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, 30 percent of all guns seized in California in 2019 were ghost guns. The California Bureau of Firearms reported seizing 512% more ghost guns in 2019 than in 2018 and those numbers are on the rise.

In the year 2021, two ghost guns were seized in Solana Beach during two separate incidents:
• A domestic violence incident in May 2021 - male suspect fled the scene but was contacted/arrested by deputies the following day. A ghost gun was located in his vehicle.
• In October 2021, Deputies arrested a female who committed a robbery against an elderly male. The previous day, she was involved in a hit and run while driving a stolen vehicle. When deputies recovered the vehicle, a ghost gun was located inside.

April 13, 2022
Ordinance 522 – Non-Serialized Untraceable Ghost Guns

Page 2 of 4 ends

To date, there are no incidents where a ghost gun was used in a commission of a crime within the City’s boundaries.

In 2018, California effectuated a law that requires ghost gun builders to apply for a unique serial number from the Department of Justice within ten days of purchase (Cal.

Penal Code 29180), but the requirement does not apply to sellers, leaving it legal to sell kits and parts without a serial number. California has also passed a new state law that will require retailers to pass background checks and have a license. The legislation goes into effect in July 2022.

The County of San Diego adopted a similar law on January 25, 2022 (effective Feb. 24, 2022) which will prohibit possessing, purchasing, selling, offering to sell, transferring, offering to transfer, receiving and transporting non-serialized unfinished frames and receivers and non-serialized firearms, including those created by 3D printing, within all districts in the unincorporated areas of the County of San Diego. The City of San Diego adopted a similar ordinance in September 2021.

The State of California is taking additional action to ban ghost guns. On Feb. 18, 2022, Senate Majority Leader Emeritus Bob Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, joined the governor to announce the new legislation intended to limit the spread of ghost guns (AB 1621). AB 1621 by Assemblymember Gipson aims to further restrict ghost guns in California by bringing the state into compliance with a proposed new federal rule that would cause many gun kits and “80 percent receivers” to be regulated the same as fully functional firearms and finished receivers. Under the legislation, these kits cannot be sold without a serial number or without the buyer undergoing a background check. Companion legislation would allow private citizens to sue anyone who manufactures, distributes, transports, imports into the state or sells assault weapons, .50 BMG rifles, ghost guns, or ghost gun kits. This legislation is projected to be adopted in the current legislative session (e.g. no later than August 2022).

The action before the City Council is to consider introducing Ordinance 522 amending Chapter 7.20 and adding 7.20.040 to the Solana Beach Municipal Code to regulate nonserialized untraceable ghost guns.

DISCUSSION:

Ghost guns have proven to be a loophole in the regulations designed to make safer the sale and use of firearms. Due to the nature of how ghost guns are created through doit-yourself at-home kits, these firearms are not sold with unique serial numbers or identifying characteristics that would allow them to be traced. Further, because ghost guns are not regulated like other commercially manufactured firearms there are no background checks, waiting periods or age restrictions on their purchase. This loophole allows those who are underage to purchase ghost guns as well as criminals or others who would otherwise be barred from owning such weapons.

April 13, 2022
Ordinance 522 – Non-Serialized Untraceable Ghost Guns

Page 3 of 4 ends

The City of Solana Beach has previously taken action to address the regulation of firearms and ghost guns in the City:
• On September 25, 2019, the City of Solana Beach adopted Ordinance 505, adding Section 7.20.030 to the Solana Beach Municipal Code requiring the safe residential storage of firearms in the City.
• In March 2020, the City of Solana Beach passed Resolution 2020-032 requesting that the 22nd District Agricultural Association to Prohibit the Sale of Unregulated Firearm Parts, Components and/or Gun Build Kits, known to be used to help create “ghost guns,” at the Del Mar Fairgrounds.
• On April 14, 2021, the City of Solana Beach passed Resolution 2021-046 expressing support for SB 264 (proposed state laws that would “prohibit a state or county officer or employee, or operator, lessee, or licensee of any state-owned or county-owned property, from contracting for, authorizing, or allowing the sale of any firearm, firearm precursor part, or ammunition on state or county property”) and AB 452 (requiring schools to notify parents about the safe storage of firearms).

This proposed ordinance has been drafted in consideration of State and Federal laws and strikes a balance to be consistent with these laws and to help address the frightening loophole created by the proliferation of ghost guns in our community. This ordinance will prohibit the possession, purchase and sale of non-serialized untraceable firearms in the City of Solana Beach and will help close the loophole that has allowed ghost guns to proliferate in our community.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact as a result of this item. However, implementation and enforcement of Ordinance 522, if adopted, would be the responsibility of City Staff and the San Diego Sheriff’s Department.

WORK PLAN:

Although not in the current FY 2021/22 Work Plan, the Council directed Staff at the March 23, 2022 City Council meeting to prioritize this ordinance for implementation prior to July 1, 2022.

April 13, 2022
Ordinance 522 – Non-Serialized Untraceable Ghost Guns

Page 4 of 4 ends

OPTIONS:
 Introduce Ordinance 522 amending Chapter 7.20 and adding Chapter 7.20.040 to the Solana Beach Municipal Code to address non-serialized untraceable ghost guns.
 Do not introduce Ordinance 522 and provide direction/feedback.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council introduce Ordinance 522 amending Chapter 7.20 and adding Chapter 7.20.040 to the Solana Beach Municipal Code to address nonserialized untraceable ghost guns.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Ordinance 522
ORDINANCE 522
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7.20 AND ADDING
CHAPTER 7.20.040 OF THE SOLANA BEACH MUNICIPAL

CODE RELATING TO NON-SERIALIZED, UNFINISHED

FIREARM FRAMES OR RECEIVERS AND NON-SERIALIZED

FIREARMS
WHEREAS, there is a massive loophole in California resulting in the sale and use of unregulated, non-serialized and untraceable firearms. These firearms are built from unregulated firearm parts, components and/or gun build kits known to be used to help create do-it-yourself “ghost guns;” and
WHEREAS, the ghost gun loophole allows people to buy and build firearms without passing a background check or complying with other laws that regulate the sale of firearms in California and the United States; and
WHEREAS, due to the nature of how ghost guns are created through do-ityourself at-home kits, these firearms are not sold with unique serial numbers or identifying characteristics that would allow them to be traced; and WHEREAS, because ghost guns are not regulated like other commercially manufactured firearms there are no background checks, waiting periods or age restrictions on their purchase. This loophole allows those who are underage to purchase ghost guns as well as criminals or others who would otherwise be barred from owning such weapons; and
WHEREAS, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, 30 percent of all guns seized in California in 2019 were ghost guns. The California Bureau of Firearms reported seizing 512% more ghost guns in 2019 than in 2018 and those numbers are on the rise; and
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2019, the City adopted Ordinance 505, adding Section 7.20.030 to the Solana Beach Municipal Code requiring the safe residential storage of firearms in the City; and
WHEREAS, in 2018 the California legislature effectuated a law that requires ghost gun builders to apply for a unique serial number from the Department of Justice within ten days of purchase (Cal. Penal Code 29180), but the requirement does not apply to sellers, leaving it legal to sell kits and parts without a serial number; and WHEREAS, the California legislature passed a new state law that will require retailers to pass background checks and have a license, but the legislation does not go into effect until July 2022; and
Ordinance 522
Ghost Guns

Page 2 of 6 ends

WHEREAS, in March 2020, the City of Solana Beach passed Resolution 2020- 032 requesting that the 22nd District Agricultural Association to Prohibit the Sale of Unregulated Firearm Parts, Components and/or Gun Build Kits, known to be used to help create ghost guns, at the Del Mar Fairgrounds; and WHEREAS, this proposed ordinance has been drafted in consideration of State and Federal laws and remains consistent with these laws to help address the frightening loophole created by the proliferation of ghost guns in our community; and WHEREAS, this proposed ordinance will prohibit the possession, purchase and sale of non-serialized untraceable firearms in the City of Solana Beach and will help close the loophole that has allowed ghost guns to proliferate in our community; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach finds it is within its police power to implement and enforce the provisions of this Ordinance.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does ordain as follows:

Chapter 7.20 is hereby amended and Chapter 7.20.040 is hereby added to the City of Solana Beach municipal code, to read as follows:

7.20.040 Prohibition of Possession or Sale of Non-Serialized, Unfinished Firearm Frames or Receivers and Non-Serialized Firearms.

A. Purpose and Intent. It is the purpose and intent of this section that possession, purchase, sale, receipt, and transportation of non-serialized, unfinished frames and unfinished receivers, and non-serialized firearms within the City of Solana Beach be prohibited for the protection, health and welfare of the public, to further effective law enforcement, and to provide the City with reasonable measures to address the dangers to the community posed by non-serialized firearms, commonly known as “ghost guns.” This section is intended to be applied and interpreted consistent with state and federal law.

B. Definitions. The following definitions apply in this section:

1. “Federal Firearms Importer” has the same meaning as in 18 U.S.C. section 921(a)(9)(2019), as may be amended.

2. “Federal Firearms Manufacturer” has the same meaning as in 18 U.S.C. section 921(a)(10)(2019), as may be amended.

3. “Firearm” has the same meaning as in California Penal Code section 16520(a), as may be amended. As used in this section, firearm shall include a handgun, rifle, or shotgun.

Ordinance 522
Ghost Guns

Page 3 of 6 ends

4. “Frame” means the primary structural component of a firearm to which the fire control components are attached.

5. “Handgun” has the same meaning as in California Penal Code section 16640, as may be amended.

6. “Non-serialized Firearm” means a firearm that is not either imprinted with a serial number issued to that firearm by a Federal Firearms Importer or Federal Firearms Manufacturer in compliance with federal law or engraved or permanently affixed with a serial number provided by the California Department of Justice for that firearm.

7. “Person” has the same meaning as in SBMC 7.20.030.

8. “Receiver” means the primary structural component of a firearm to which the fire control components are attached.

9. “Rifle” has the same meaning as in California Penal Code section 17090, as may be amended.

10.“Shotgun” has the same meaning as in California Penal Code section 17190, as may be amended.

11.“Unfinished Frame” means a piece of any material that does not constitute the completed frame of a firearm, but that has been shaped or formed in any way for the purpose of becoming the frame of a firearm, and which may be made into a functional frame of a firearm through milling, drilling, or other means.

12.“Unfinished Receiver” means a piece of any material that does not constitute the completed receiver of a firearm, but that has been shaped or formed in any way for the purpose of becoming the receiver of a firearm, and which may be made into a functional receiver of a firearm through milling, drilling, or other means.

C. Prohibition. It is unlawful for any Person to:

1. Possess, purchase, transport, or receive an unfinished frame or unfinished receiver, unless the unfinished frame or unfinished receiver is imprinted with a serial number issued to that unfinished frame or unfinished receiver by a Federal Firearms Importer or Federal Firearms Manufacturer, or engraved or permanently affixed with a serial number provided by the California Department of Justice for that unfinished frame or unfinished receiver. a. This subsection shall not apply to a Federal Firearms Importer or Federal Firearms Manufacturer.

Ordinance 522
Ghost Guns

Page 4 of 6 ends

b. This subsection shall not apply to an employee or sworn peace officer of a local, state, or federal law enforcement agency if the employee or sworn peace officer is acting within the scope of official duties. c. This subsection shall not apply to a common carrier licensed or regulated under state or federal law or an authorized agent of a common carrier when acting in the course and scope of duties incident to the receipt, processing, transportation, or delivery of property.

2. Sell, offer to sell, transfer, or offer to transfer an unfinished frame or unfinished receiver, unless the unfinished frame or unfinished receiver is imprinted with a serial number issued to that unfinished frame or unfinished receiver by a Federal Firearms Importer or Federal Firearms Manufacturer, or engraved or permanently affixed with a serial number provided by the California Department of Justice for that unfinished frame or unfinished receiver.

3. Possess, purchase, transport, or receive a non-serialized firearm. a. This subsection shall not apply to an employee or sworn peace officer of a local, state, or federal law enforcement agency if the employee or sworn peace officer is acting within the scope of official duties. b. This subsection shall not apply to a common carrier licensed or regulated under state or federal law or an authorized agent of a common carrier when acting in the course and scope of duties incident to the receipt, processing, transportation, or delivery of property.
c. This subsection shall not apply to a non-serialized firearm if any of the following conditions apply:
i. The non-serialized firearm has been rendered permanently inoperable.
ii. The non-serialized firearm is an antique firearm as defined in California Penal Code section 16170, as may be amended. iii. The non-serialized firearm was manufactured or assembled prior to 1968.
iv. The non-serialized firearm has been determined to be a collector’s item pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Ch. 53, including section 5845 (2019), as may be amended, or a curio or relic pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Ch. 44, including section 921(a) (2019), as may be amended, and 27 C.

F. R. section 478.11 (2019), as may be amended.

Ordinance 522
Ghost Guns

Page 5 of 6 ends

v. The non-serialized firearm has been entered into the centralized registry set forth in California Penal Code section 11106, as may be amended, prior to July 1, 2018, as being owned by a specific individual or entity if that firearm has assigned to it a distinguishing number or mark of identification.
d. It shall be an affirmative defense to this subsection that the person is in compliance with California Penal Code section 29180, as may be amended.

4. Sell, offer to sell, transfer, or offer to transfer a non-serialized firearm. This subsection shall not apply to a non-serialized firearm if any of the following conditions apply:
a. The non-serialized firearm has been rendered permanently inoperable. b. The non-serialized firearm is an antique firearm as defined in California Penal Code section 16170, as may be amended.
c. The non-serialized firearm was manufactured or assembled prior to 1968. d. The non-serialized firearm has been determined to be a collector’s item pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Ch. 53, including section 5845 (2019), as may be amended, or a curio or relic pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Ch. 44, including section 921(a) (2019), as may be amended, and 27 C. F. R. section 478.11 (2019), as may be amended.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the City Clerk of the City of Solana Beach shall proceed with publication pursuant to the provisions of Government Code section 36933.

INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ this 13th day of April 2022, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California; AND THEREAFTER ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, on the ___ day of __________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
Ordinance 522
Ghost Guns

Page 6 of 6 ends

__________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________________ ___________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.2.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Clerk’s Office
SUBJECT: Climate Action Commission Appointment
BACKGROUND:

All appointments to Citizen Commissions are conducted in accordance with Council Policy No. 5 - Appointment of Citizens to Boards, Commissions, Committees, and Task Forces (Attachment 1) - and all persons interested in serving on the City’s Citizen Commissions are required to “complete and file … a Citizen Interest Form (application),” with the required references, and submit it to the City Clerk for formal application processing. The Application/Citizen Interest Form is available year-round at the City Clerk’s Office and on the City’s website. The Climate Action Commission’s appointments are made by Council-at-large.

A majority vote of the City Council is required for appointment.

Resignations were received from Shawn McGarry on January 27, 2022 and Peter Zahn on January 31, 2022 leaving two vacancies with terms until 2023.

This item is before the City Council to review and consider appointments of citizens to fill two vacancies on the Climate Action.

DISCUSSION:

Noticing
On February 17, 2022, the City Clerk posted a Notice of Vacancy (Attachment 2) for two vacancies on the Climate Action Commission, per California Government Code Section 54974(a), with a deadline of April 05, 2022, in an effort to refill the positions and bring the Commission to full membership. By the April 5th deadline, four applications (Attachment 3) were received. As in the past, if applications are received after the deadline, they will not be forwarded to Council for consideration, as directed by Council in January 2019 to no longer consider late applications.

Recruitment notices were posted on the City’s official bulletin board and the City’s website, eblast notices were emailed three times, and requests were made to the Solana Beach Sun (UT) and the Coast News to highlight the recruitment.

April 13, 2022
Climate Action Citizen Commission Appointment

Page 2 of 2 ends

Member Requirements
SBMC Section 2.72 outlines some of the duties of the Commission. To carry out the Commission’s work, SBMC Section 2.60.010 outlines the requirements of meeting attendance.

As a legislative body, like the City Council, Citizen Commissions are required to fulfill a responsibility of participating in each meeting for all matters brought before the Commission.

In addition, the Commission Handbook, provided to each appointed/re-appointed member, and posted online, provides various other requirements, regulations, guidelines, and procedures for Commission members and meeting protocol.

Member Appointment
The official start date of the appointed Commission members takes effect once the official oath is administered by the City Clerk. The swear-in may take place before or at the first meeting of the Commission. The official oath is required in order to begin participating in Commission business.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORKPLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
 Make appointments to the Climate Action Commission.
 Provide alternative direction.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council consider the applications submitted for appointments to two vacancies on the Climate Action Commission with a term ending January 2023.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department recommendation.
________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Council Policy No. 5

2. Vacancy Notice

3. List of Applicants

4. Applications

Page 1 of 2 ends

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH Policy No. 5

COUNCIL POLICY
Adopted: May 15, 1989
Revised: January 23, 2008 by
Resolution 2008-23
GENERAL SUBJECT: Citizen Boards, Commissions & Committees SPECIFIC SUBJECT: Appointments of Citizens to Boards, Commissions, Committees and Task Forces.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this policy is to establish a consistent process and procedure for appointments to City sponsored Citizen Boards, Commissions, Committees and Task Forces.

POLICY STATEMENT:

Appointments to Citizen Boards, Commissions, Committees and Task Forces are made in accordance with the municipal code and/or specific guideline, as provided, to provide consistency.

POLICY PROCEDURES:

1. All private citizens interested in serving on any Board, Commission, Committee or Task Force or similar group must complete and file with the City Clerk a Citizen Interest Form (application) which may be obtained from the City Clerk’s office.

2. Nominations
Councilmembers may nominate private citizens for appointment subject to ratification by a majority of the City Council. Such ratification shall take place at a regular City Council meeting and a duly docketed agenda item.

3. Appointment Protocol
a. Appointments will be made in accordance with municipal code requirements. For example, the municipal code may require that a Commission have five positions appointed by individual
Councilmembers.
b. Appointments that are not outlined in the municipal code and are at-large appointment positions may be nominated by any
Councilmember. In the event of multiple appointments,
appointments may be divided among individual Councilmembers to share the appointment responsibilities. If the appointments are

Page 2 of 2 ends

shared, it will be for that one time and will not be construed as official individual appointments that would carry forward. c. The decision to proceed with an individual appointment alternative for at-large positions will be subject to majority vote of the City Council with such vote taking place at a regular City Council Meeting.

4. Appointments to Outside Agencies
When the City is asked by an outside agency to recommend a private citizen to serve on a Board, Commission, Committee or Task Force or similar group, such recommendation shall be made by the Council and approved by a majority vote of the City Council.

PUBLIC NOTICE
City of Solana Beach

CITIZEN COMMISSION POSITION VACANCY

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH VOLUNTEERS SERVING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL Applications are currently being accepted through Tuesday, April 5, 2022, 5:30 p.m.

City Council is scheduled to make appointments at the April 13, 2022 City Council Meeting.

CLIMATE ACTION COMMISSION
Two Citizen/Resident Position Vacancies
terms will expire January 2023
At the expiration of the term, the appointed member may submit the short form resubmittal application, for consideration by Council to be re-appointed.

Regular Meetings: 3
rd Wednesday of each month at 5:30 p.m.

Position Requirement:

These vacancies must be filled with a Citizen/Resident: at least 18 years old and a city resident within the City of Solana Beach.

Current Composition:

Nine members total: 7 appointed by Council At-Large, 2 Councilmembers - 5 Members – Citizen/Resident: At least 18 years old and a city resident within the City of Solana Beach.
- 2 Members - Scientific/Environmental Community Professionals: Must be from the environmental or scientific community. Resident or Non-resident. - 2 Councilmembers
Staff Liaison: Rimga Viskanta 858-720-2467
❖ Attend a Citizen Commission Meeting. It is recommended that new applicants attend a Commission meeting prior to being considered for an appointment. Agendas are posted on the City’s website. See the City’s website for members, expiring positions, and further information.

Citizen Interest Forms (Applications) and additional information on the Commissions can be found on the City’s website at www.cityofsolanabeach.org (Left tabs: City Government, City Clerk, Citizen Committees) OR at City Hall, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, (858) 720-2400. Please contact the City Clerk with any questions regarding the recruitment/appointment process.

The Climate Action Commission participates in reviewing certain matters regarding reducing the City’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and implementing the Climate Action Plan.

Under Council’s direction, the Climate Action Commission will focus on specific issues surrounding the implementation of a Climate Action Plan including updating the City's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, setting reduction targets, implementing mitigation measures and performing periodic monitoring, verification and evaluations.
2-17-2022 Megan Bavin, Deputy, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 3
City of Solana Beach
Citizen Commission Member
Appointment by City Council
Application Status
Deadline April 5th 5:30 p.m.

List of Applicants

CLIMATE ACTION COMMISSION
Applicant Application
Received
John Kellogg 2-15-22
Dick Bratcher 4-4-22
Mika Nagamine 4-4-22
Ken Flagg 4-4-22

I
ATTACHMENT 4

APPLICATIONS
This Attachment is not posted online but is
available by contacting the City Clerk’s Office.

Solana Beach City CouncilApril 13, 2022

Solana Beach City Council
April 13, 2022